1r1w commited on
Commit
7f9f126
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): a2d5802

Add dataset card: AgentNet task source, 81 trajectories, policy branches

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +119 -0
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: apache-2.0
3
+ task_categories:
4
+ - other
5
+ language:
6
+ - en
7
+ tags:
8
+ - gui
9
+ - world-model
10
+ - desktop
11
+ - agent
12
+ - ubuntu
13
+ - branching
14
+ size_categories:
15
+ - 10K<n<100K
16
+ configs:
17
+ - config_name: default
18
+ data_files: data/*.parquet
19
+ ---
20
+
21
+ # GUI World Model — Branch Transitions
22
+
23
+ `(s, a, s')` transitions taken **beside** a walked trajectory rather than along
24
+ it: the same state, a different action, and the screen that actually followed.
25
+ Every state is captured from a running Ubuntu desktop — a screenshot, the
26
+ accessibility tree as XML, and the rendered element table the model reads.
27
+
28
+ A spine records what an agent did. This set records what it did **not** do and
29
+ what would have happened, which is the question an agent asks a world model
30
+ when it plans.
31
+
32
+ ## What is here
33
+
34
+ | | |
35
+ |---|---:|
36
+ | transitions | 57,810 |
37
+ | trajectories branched | 81 |
38
+ | shards | 341 |
39
+ | size | ~32 GB |
40
+
41
+ **All 81 trajectories carry AgentNet instructions**, nine from each of nine
42
+ applications:
43
+
44
+ chrome gimp libreoffice_calc libreoffice_impress libreoffice_writer
45
+ os thunderbird vlc vs_code
46
+
47
+ Nine each is deliberate — the collector takes one task from each application in
48
+ turn, so a run that stops early still covers every application rather than the
49
+ beginning of the alphabet.
50
+
51
+ Several tasks appear more than once under different start states
52
+ (`__cfg0` … `__cfg3`), which is how the same instruction is walked on more than
53
+ one arrangement of the desktop.
54
+
55
+ ## Spine and branch are both present, and are not the same thing
56
+
57
+ Sampled over 250 rows spread through the set:
58
+
59
+ | `origin` | share |
60
+ |---|---:|
61
+ | `branch` | 90% |
62
+ | `spine` | 10% |
63
+
64
+ The spine rows are the walked path the branches hang off. **Do not add the two
65
+ counts into a single figure** — they answer different questions, and a total
66
+ that mixes them cannot be attributed to either.
67
+
68
+ Every branch in this set is `candidate_origin: policy-sampled` at
69
+ `branch_depth: 1`: one step away from a spine state, with the action drawn from
70
+ the policy rather than uniformly from the clickable elements. The uniform arm
71
+ lives elsewhere.
72
+
73
+ ## Columns that say what a row is
74
+
75
+ | column | values |
76
+ |---|---|
77
+ | `origin` | `spine` · `branch` |
78
+ | `candidate_origin` | `policy-sampled` (branch rows) · empty on spine rows |
79
+ | `branch_depth` | `1` on branch rows, empty on spine rows |
80
+ | `trajectory_source` | `replay` throughout |
81
+ | `source_archive` | `walked-spine` — the branches were taken from stored spine states |
82
+ | `task_id` | `agentnet_<application>_<id>[__cfg<n>]` |
83
+
84
+ ### A known gap
85
+
86
+ `instruction_source` is filled on spine rows and **empty on branch rows**. The
87
+ task's origin is still recoverable from the `task_id` prefix, which is
88
+ `agentnet_` for every row here, but a reader filtering on the column alone will
89
+ find the branches unlabelled.
90
+
91
+ ## What this set does not tell you
92
+
93
+ **Whether the branched trajectories succeeded at their tasks.** These were
94
+ collected before `spine` was narrowed to mean *a trajectory a judge called
95
+ successful*, so a branch here is an alternative to an action that was taken,
96
+ not necessarily an alternative to a correct one.
97
+
98
+ That matters for evaluation and not for training. Training on a transition uses
99
+ only the fact that this screen, under this action, became that screen — which is
100
+ observed, and true regardless of how the task ended. Evaluation that asks
101
+ whether a branch was better or worse than the path needs the path to be known
102
+ good, and here it is not recorded.
103
+
104
+ ## How the branch actions were chosen
105
+
106
+ The policy is asked once for the state with `n=32` at temperature 1.0, and the
107
+ completions are grouped by **intention** rather than by string: the verb plus
108
+ the smallest accessibility element containing the point. On one Thunderbird
109
+ state, 24 distinct strings were three intentions, six of them the same button
110
+ five pixels apart. The most common intentions are executed, up to a budget of
111
+ ten, because each execution costs a VM action and a snapshot.
112
+
113
+ `draw_count` — how many of the 32 produced each intention — is computed but not
114
+ stored, so a nine-of-thirty-two action cannot be told from a one-of-thirty-two
115
+ one after the fact.
116
+
117
+ ## Related
118
+
119
+ - `gui-wm/spine` — 154,220 spine-only transitions, no branches