v2d / simulation /modules /IsaacLab /docs /source /testing /micro_benchmarks.rst
hk239's picture
Upload v2d project (excluding data and .venv) (part 15)
d6b3397 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
10.2 kB
.. _testing_micro_benchmarks:
Micro-Benchmarks for Performance Testing
========================================
Isaac Lab provides micro-benchmarking tools to measure the performance of asset
setter/writer methods and data property accessors without requiring Isaac Sim.
.. seealso::
For full-simulation benchmarks (environment stepping, RL training), see
:ref:`testing_benchmarks`. This page covers method-level micro-benchmarks
that use mock interfaces.
Overview
--------
The benchmarks use **mock interfaces** to simulate PhysX views, allowing performance
measurement of Python-level overhead in isolation. This is useful for:
- Comparing list vs tensor index performance
- Identifying bottlenecks in hot code paths
- Tracking performance regressions
- Optimizing custom methods
Quick Start
-----------
Run benchmarks using the Isaac Lab launcher:
.. code-block:: bash
# Run Articulation method benchmarks
./isaaclab.sh -p source/isaaclab_physx/benchmark/assets/benchmark_articulation.py
# With custom parameters
./isaaclab.sh -p source/isaaclab_physx/benchmark/assets/benchmark_articulation.py \
--num_iterations 1000 \
--num_instances 64 \
--num_bodies 5 \
--num_joints 4
Available Benchmarks
--------------------
Asset Method Benchmarks
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
These benchmark setter and writer methods on asset classes:
.. list-table::
:header-rows: 1
:widths: 35 25 40
* - Benchmark File
- Asset Class
- Methods Covered
* - ``benchmark_articulation.py``
- ``Articulation``
- 24 methods (root/joint state, mass props, forces)
* - ``benchmark_rigid_object.py``
- ``RigidObject``
- 13 methods (root state, mass props, forces)
* - ``benchmark_rigid_object_collection.py``
- ``RigidObjectCollection``
- 13 methods (body state, mass props, forces)
Data Property Benchmarks
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
These benchmark property accessors on data classes:
.. list-table::
:header-rows: 1
:widths: 40 30 30
* - Benchmark File
- Data Class
- Properties
* - ``benchmark_articulation_data.py``
- ``ArticulationData``
- 59 properties
* - ``benchmark_rigid_object_data.py``
- ``RigidObjectData``
- 40 properties
* - ``benchmark_rigid_object_collection_data.py``
- ``RigidObjectCollectionData``
- 40 properties
All benchmarks are located in ``source/isaaclab_physx/benchmark/assets/``.
Command Line Arguments
----------------------
Common Arguments
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.. list-table::
:header-rows: 1
:widths: 20 15 65
* - Argument
- Default
- Description
* - ``--num_iterations``
- 1000
- Number of timed iterations
* - ``--warmup_steps``
- 10
- Warmup iterations (not timed)
* - ``--num_instances``
- 4096
- Number of asset instances
* - ``--device``
- ``cuda:0``
- Device for tensors
* - ``--mode``
- ``all``
- ``all``, ``torch_list``, or ``torch_tensor``
* - ``--output``
- auto
- Output JSON filename
* - ``--no_csv``
- false
- Disable CSV output
Asset-Specific Arguments
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
**Articulation benchmarks:**
- ``--num_bodies``: Number of links (default: 13)
- ``--num_joints``: Number of DOFs (default: 12)
**RigidObjectCollection benchmarks:**
- ``--num_bodies``: Number of bodies in collection (default: 5)
Benchmark Modes
---------------
Each method is benchmarked under two input scenarios:
**torch_list**
Environment/body IDs passed as Python lists. Measures the overhead of
list-to-tensor conversion, which is common in user code.
**torch_tensor**
Environment/body IDs passed as pre-allocated tensors. Represents the
optimal baseline with minimal overhead.
Example output:
.. code-block:: text
[1/24] [TORCH_LIST] write_root_state_to_sim... 132.02 Β± 6.79 Β΅s
[1/24] [TORCH_TENSOR] write_root_state_to_sim... 65.44 Β± 3.06 Β΅s
The comparison shows tensor indices are ~2x faster than list indices.
Output Format
-------------
Console Output
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.. code-block:: text
Benchmarking Articulation (PhysX) with 64 instances, 5 bodies, 4 joints...
Device: cuda:0
Iterations: 100, Warmup: 10
Benchmarking 24 methods...
[1/24] [TORCH_LIST] write_root_state_to_sim... 132.02 Β± 6.79 Β΅s
[1/24] [TORCH_TENSOR] write_root_state_to_sim... 65.44 Β± 3.06 Β΅s
...
================================================================================
COMPARISON: Torch_list vs Torch_tensor
================================================================================
Method Name Torch_list Torch_tensor Speedup
------------------------------------------------------------------------
write_root_state_to_sim 132.02 65.44 2.02x
Export Files
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Results are automatically exported to:
- ``{benchmark_name}_{timestamp}.json`` - Full results with hardware info
- ``{benchmark_name}_{timestamp}.csv`` - Tabular results for analysis
JSON Structure
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.. code-block:: json
{
"config": {
"num_iterations": 100,
"num_instances": 64,
"device": "cuda:0"
},
"hardware": {
"cpu": "Intel Core i9-13950HX",
"gpu": "NVIDIA RTX 5000",
"pytorch": "2.7.0",
"cuda": "12.8"
},
"results": [
{
"name": "write_root_state_to_sim",
"mode": "torch_list",
"mean_us": 132.02,
"std_us": 6.79,
"iterations": 100
}
]
}
Architecture
------------
The benchmarks use mock interfaces to simulate PhysX views without Isaac Sim:
.. code-block:: text
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚ Asset Class │────>β”‚ MockArticulationViewβ”‚
β”‚ (Articulation) β”‚ β”‚ (mock_interfaces) β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
β”‚
v
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚ MethodBenchmarkRunner β”‚
β”‚ (extends BaseIsaacLab- β”‚
β”‚ Benchmark) β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
β”‚
v
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚ Output Backends β”‚
β”‚ (json, osmo, omniperf) β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
Key Components
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1. **Mock Views** (``isaaclab_physx/test/mock_interfaces/``)
- ``MockArticulationView`` - Mimics PhysX ArticulationView
- ``MockRigidBodyView`` - Mimics PhysX RigidBodyView
2. **Benchmark Framework** (``isaaclab/test/benchmark/``)
- :class:`~isaaclab.test.benchmark.MethodBenchmarkRunner` - Runner extending
:class:`~isaaclab.test.benchmark.BaseIsaacLabBenchmark` for method-level benchmarks
- :class:`~isaaclab.test.benchmark.MethodBenchmarkRunnerConfig` - Configuration dataclass
- :class:`~isaaclab.test.benchmark.MethodBenchmarkDefinition` - Benchmark definition
- Multiple output backends (JSON, Osmo, OmniPerf)
3. **Module Mocking**
Each benchmark file mocks Isaac Sim dependencies (``isaacsim``, ``omni``, ``pxr``)
to allow the asset classes to be instantiated without simulation.
Adding New Benchmarks
---------------------
Adding a Method Benchmark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1. Create input generator functions:
.. code-block:: python
from isaaclab.test.benchmark import MethodBenchmarkRunnerConfig
def gen_my_method_torch_list(config: MethodBenchmarkRunnerConfig) -> dict:
return {
"param1": torch.rand(config.num_instances, 3, device=config.device),
"env_ids": list(range(config.num_instances)),
}
def gen_my_method_torch_tensor(config: MethodBenchmarkRunnerConfig) -> dict:
return {
"param1": torch.rand(config.num_instances, 3, device=config.device),
"env_ids": torch.arange(config.num_instances, device=config.device),
}
2. Add to the ``BENCHMARKS`` list:
.. code-block:: python
from isaaclab.test.benchmark import MethodBenchmarkDefinition
MethodBenchmarkDefinition(
name="my_method",
method_name="my_method",
input_generators={
"torch_list": gen_my_method_torch_list,
"torch_tensor": gen_my_method_torch_tensor,
},
category="my_category",
),
Adding a Property Benchmark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For data class properties, add to the ``PROPERTIES`` list:
.. code-block:: python
("my_property", {"derived_from": ["dependency1", "dependency2"]}),
The ``derived_from`` key indicates dependencies that should be pre-computed
before timing the property access.
Performance Tips
----------------
Based on benchmark results:
1. **Use tensor indices** instead of lists for 30-50% speedup
2. **Pre-allocate index tensors** and reuse them across calls
3. **Batch operations** where possible (e.g., set all joint positions at once)
4. **Mass properties are CPU-bound** - PhysX requires CPU tensors for these
Example optimization:
.. code-block:: python
# Slow: Create new list each call
for _ in range(1000):
robot.write_joint_state_to_sim(state, env_ids=list(range(64)))
# Fast: Pre-allocate tensor and reuse
env_ids = torch.arange(64, device="cuda:0")
for _ in range(1000):
robot.write_joint_state_to_sim(state, env_ids=env_ids)
Troubleshooting
---------------
Import Errors
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ensure you're running through ``isaaclab.sh``:
.. code-block:: bash
./isaaclab.sh -p source/isaaclab_physx/benchmark/assets/benchmark_articulation.py
CUDA Out of Memory
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Reduce ``--num_instances``:
.. code-block:: bash
./isaaclab.sh -p ... --num_instances 1024
Slow First Run
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The first run compiles Warp kernels. Subsequent runs will be faster.