TelegramGuard / modules /probe.py
ilang-ai
反spam: 同步私有姊妹版的入口完整性审计成果
e4cf54e
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
5.68 kB
"""
Probe ("check-in") detection.
Spam bots warm a group up with harmless filler — 签到 / 打卡 / 冒泡 — to see whether
anyone is moderating and to build a bit of message history before dropping the
actual ad. This layer is deliberately the gentlest one in the stack:
* every non-admin member is subject to it (not just new joiners)
* it NEVER bans — the worst it does is silently delete
* and it only starts deleting after the same member has been flagged
config.PROBE_FLAG_DELETE times inside a rolling PROBE_WINDOW_HOURS window
Everything else keeps going through the lexicon + AI path.
"""
import logging
import re
import config
from modules.db import shared_db
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# Deliberately narrow — only the check-in family of phrases.
# A wider pattern (哈+ / 好+的? / 收到 / 顶, plus "pure emoji" and "pure punctuation")
# was measured against real Chinese group chat: it hit 59% of ordinary short
# messages. Since this layer applies to every member, that means silently
# deleting real people's "哈哈" and "👍" — worse than missing a probe.
PROBE_PATTERNS = re.compile(
r"^(签到|打卡|报到|新人报道|前来报道|冒泡|水一下|沙发|路过)\s*$"
)
def looks_like_probe(text):
"""Pure check-in filler. Single-message check, no history involved."""
if not text:
return False
t = text.strip()
return len(t) <= 8 and bool(PROBE_PATTERNS.match(t))
# A bare "/start@SomeOtherBot" posted in a group is the classic way to drive
# traffic to another bot — you start a bot in private, not by announcing it in a
# group. The AI judge cannot flag it (there is nothing to judge but a command),
# so it belongs here. Only /start: "/menu@ShopBot" is somebody legitimately
# using another bot in the group and must not be touched.
FOREIGN_START = re.compile(r"^/start@([A-Za-z0-9_]{4,32})\s*$", re.I)
def looks_like_foreign_start(text, my_username=""):
"""True for a bare /start aimed at a bot that is not us."""
if not text:
return False
m = FOREIGN_START.match(text.strip())
if not m:
return False
return m.group(1).lower() != (my_username or "").lower().lstrip("@")
def _window_hours():
try:
return max(1, int(getattr(config, "PROBE_WINDOW_HOURS", 24)))
except (TypeError, ValueError):
return 24
async def add_flag(chat_id, user_id):
"""Add one probe flag for this member and return the running count.
UPSERT, not a bare UPDATE: members have no row until their first probe, and
an UPDATE that matches nothing affects 0 rows and keeps returning 0 — the
delete threshold would never be reached and this whole layer would be dead.
window_start records the START of the current window and is NOT refreshed on
a hit, so the window genuinely expires. Refreshing it every time would let
the count of someone who posts one such message a day ratchet up forever
until they are permanently silenced.
"""
window = "-%d hours" % _window_hours()
async with shared_db() as db:
await db.execute(
"INSERT INTO probe_flags (chat_id, user_id, flags, window_start) "
"VALUES (?, ?, 1, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP) "
"ON CONFLICT(chat_id, user_id) DO UPDATE SET "
"flags = CASE WHEN window_start IS NULL OR window_start < datetime('now', ?) "
" THEN 1 ELSE flags + 1 END, "
"window_start = CASE WHEN window_start IS NULL OR window_start < datetime('now', ?) "
" THEN CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ELSE window_start END",
(chat_id, user_id, window, window)
)
await db.commit()
cur = await db.execute(
"SELECT flags FROM probe_flags WHERE chat_id=? AND user_id=?",
(chat_id, user_id)
)
row = await cur.fetchone()
return row[0] if row else 0
# check() return values. Both are truthy, so "was this a probe?" stays a plain
# boolean test; the caller only needs to tell them apart to decide whether the
# message still exists (DELETED means the rest of the handler chain must not try
# to reply to it).
FLAGGED = "flagged"
DELETED = "deleted"
async def check(msg, chat_id, user_id, my_username=""):
"""Flag a probe message. Returns FLAGGED / DELETED, or None if not a probe.
Judges msg.text only, never captions: a caption hit would delete the photo
along with it, which is a visible accident. Admins never reach this — the
caller returns for them before calling in.
"""
if not msg.text:
return None
is_foreign_start = looks_like_foreign_start(msg.text, my_username)
if not (looks_like_probe(msg.text) or is_foreign_start):
return None
flags = await add_flag(chat_id, user_id)
logger.info("PROBE flag: user=" + str(user_id) + " chat=" + str(chat_id) +
" flags=" + str(flags) + " text=" + msg.text[:20])
# A foreign /start goes on the first hit, not on the threshold. Check-in
# filler earns a free pass because a real member may post it once without
# meaning anything by it; announcing another bot in a group does not happen
# by accident. Observed in the wild: two throwaway accounts posting it once
# each — under a threshold of 2 neither would ever have been touched.
if is_foreign_start or flags >= getattr(config, "PROBE_FLAG_DELETE", 2):
# Mark-only layer: delete quietly, never ban, never warn.
try:
await msg.delete()
return DELETED
except Exception as e:
logger.warning("PROBE delete failed: " + str(e))
return FLAGGED