| |
| """Batch 5: more algorithm-shaped repairs across both repos.""" |
| import sys |
| from pathlib import Path |
|
|
| sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).parent)) |
| from make_tasks import make, spec |
|
|
| FLOW = "python/scheduler" |
| ROUTER = "typescript/router" |
|
|
| |
| make(FLOW, "next-open-skips-windows", |
| spec("python", "logic", 4, """ |
| Jobs deferred outside their maintenance window come back at the wrong time. |
| |
| We ask the calendar when a task may next start. With several windows configured |
| and the current time sitting after the first has closed, the answer we get is a |
| time that has already passed, so the caller schedules the work immediately and |
| it runs outside any window at all. |
| |
| Asking for the next permitted time should never hand back a time in the past. |
| """), |
| [("flow/calendar.py", |
| """ if self.is_open(when): |
| return when |
| for window in self.windows: |
| if window.start >= when: |
| return window.start |
| return None""", |
| """ if self.is_open(when): |
| return when |
| return self.windows[0].start""")], |
| {"test_next_open.py": ''' |
| import unittest |
| |
| from flow import Calendar, Window |
| |
| |
| def cal(): |
| return Calendar([Window(10.0, 20.0), Window(30.0, 40.0), Window(50.0, 60.0)]) |
| |
| |
| class TestNextOpenLooksForward(unittest.TestCase): |
| def test_between_windows_finds_the_following_one(self): |
| self.assertEqual(cal().next_open(25.0), 30.0) |
| |
| def test_after_the_second_window_finds_the_third(self): |
| self.assertEqual(cal().next_open(45.0), 50.0) |
| |
| def test_never_returns_a_past_time(self): |
| c = cal() |
| for when in (0.0, 5.0, 21.0, 25.0, 41.0, 45.0, 55.0): |
| result = c.next_open(when) |
| if result is not None: |
| self.assertGreaterEqual(result, when, f"when={when}") |
| |
| def test_after_every_window_returns_none(self): |
| self.assertIsNone(cal().next_open(100.0)) |
| |
| def test_before_all_windows_returns_the_first(self): |
| self.assertEqual(cal().next_open(0.0), 10.0) |
| |
| |
| class TestNextOpenOtherwiseUnchanged(unittest.TestCase): |
| def test_inside_a_window_returns_now(self): |
| self.assertEqual(cal().next_open(15.0), 15.0) |
| |
| def test_exactly_at_a_start_returns_now(self): |
| self.assertEqual(cal().next_open(30.0), 30.0) |
| |
| def test_empty_calendar_returns_now(self): |
| self.assertEqual(Calendar().next_open(7.0), 7.0) |
| |
| def test_window_end_is_not_open(self): |
| self.assertEqual(cal().next_open(20.0), 30.0) |
| '''}) |
|
|
| |
| make(FLOW, "condition-false-never-settles", |
| spec("python", "logic", 4, """ |
| Runs that use conditional tasks hang at the end. |
| |
| Our graph has an optional publish step gated on a condition. On runs where the |
| condition comes out false the step is correctly never started -- but the run |
| then never reports itself complete, because that task sits pending forever and |
| so does everything after it. Runs where the condition is true finish fine. |
| |
| Everything that will never run needs to reach a terminal state. |
| """), |
| [("flow/scheduler.py", |
| """ if not self.upstream_satisfied(task, state): |
| state.set(task_id, st.SKIPPED) |
| skipped.append(task_id) |
| elif not self.condition_holds(task, state): |
| state.set(task_id, st.SKIPPED) |
| skipped.append(task_id)""", |
| """ if not self.upstream_satisfied(task, state): |
| state.set(task_id, st.SKIPPED) |
| skipped.append(task_id)""")], |
| {"test_settle.py": ''' |
| import unittest |
| |
| from flow import ResourcePool, Scheduler, Task, TaskGraph |
| from flow import state as st |
| |
| |
| def build(condition): |
| tasks = [Task("build"), |
| Task("publish", depends_on=frozenset({"build"}), condition=condition), |
| Task("notify", depends_on=frozenset({"publish"}))] |
| return Scheduler(TaskGraph(tasks), ResourcePool({})) |
| |
| |
| class TestFalseConditionSettles(unittest.TestCase): |
| def test_gated_task_is_skipped(self): |
| s = build("build") |
| state = s.new_state() |
| s.start("build", state) |
| s.finish("build", state, False) # condition fact is falsy |
| s.settle_unreachable(state) |
| self.assertEqual(state.get("publish"), st.SKIPPED) |
| |
| def test_downstream_of_a_skip_also_settles(self): |
| s = build("build") |
| state = s.new_state() |
| s.start("build", state) |
| s.finish("build", state, False) |
| for _ in range(3): |
| s.settle_unreachable(state) |
| self.assertEqual(state.get("notify"), st.SKIPPED) |
| |
| def test_run_completes(self): |
| s = build("build") |
| state = s.new_state() |
| s.start("build", state) |
| s.finish("build", state, False) |
| for _ in range(3): |
| s.settle_unreachable(state) |
| self.assertTrue(state.is_complete()) |
| |
| def test_settle_reports_what_it_skipped(self): |
| s = build("build") |
| state = s.new_state() |
| s.start("build", state) |
| s.finish("build", state, False) |
| self.assertIn("publish", s.settle_unreachable(state)) |
| |
| |
| class TestTrueConditionStillRuns(unittest.TestCase): |
| def test_gated_task_runs_when_condition_holds(self): |
| s = build("build") |
| state = s.new_state() |
| s.start("build", state) |
| s.finish("build", state, True) |
| s.settle_unreachable(state) |
| self.assertEqual(state.get("publish"), st.PENDING) |
| self.assertIn("publish", s.next_batch(state)) |
| |
| def test_unconditional_task_is_untouched(self): |
| s = build(None) |
| state = s.new_state() |
| s.start("build", state) |
| s.finish("build", state, False) |
| s.settle_unreachable(state) |
| self.assertEqual(state.get("publish"), st.PENDING) |
| |
| def test_failed_upstream_still_skips(self): |
| s = build(None) |
| state = s.new_state() |
| s.start("build", state) |
| s.fail("build", state) |
| self.assertEqual(state.get("publish"), st.SKIPPED) |
| '''}) |
|
|
| |
| make(ROUTER, "query-repeats-lost", |
| spec("typescript", "logic", 4, """ |
| Multi-select filters only ever apply the last value. |
| |
| Our UI sends `?tag=red&tag=blue&tag=green` when several tags are selected, and |
| the API behaves as though only green were chosen. Single-value parameters are |
| fine. |
| |
| Repeated keys should collect every value, in the order they were sent. |
| """), |
| [("src/query.ts", |
| """ if (out[key]) out[key].push(value); |
| else out[key] = [value];""", |
| """ out[key] = [value];""")], |
| {"query.test.ts": ''' |
| import { test } from 'node:test'; |
| import assert from 'node:assert'; |
| import { parseQuery, first } from '../src/index.ts'; |
| |
| test('repeated keys collect every value', () => { |
| assert.deepStrictEqual(parseQuery('?tag=red&tag=blue&tag=green').tag, |
| ['red', 'blue', 'green']); |
| }); |
| |
| test('order is preserved', () => { |
| assert.deepStrictEqual(parseQuery('a=1&a=2&a=3').a, ['1', '2', '3']); |
| }); |
| |
| test('repeats mixed with singles', () => { |
| const q = parseQuery('tag=a&page=2&tag=b'); |
| assert.deepStrictEqual(q.tag, ['a', 'b']); |
| assert.deepStrictEqual(q.page, ['2']); |
| }); |
| |
| test('duplicate identical values are all kept', () => { |
| assert.deepStrictEqual(parseQuery('x=1&x=1').x, ['1', '1']); |
| }); |
| |
| test('single values still work', () => { |
| assert.deepStrictEqual(parseQuery('?page=2'), { page: ['2'] }); |
| }); |
| |
| test('valueless keys are present and empty', () => { |
| assert.deepStrictEqual(parseQuery('?verbose').verbose, ['']); |
| }); |
| |
| test('percent and plus decoding still work', () => { |
| assert.deepStrictEqual(parseQuery('q=a%20b').q, ['a b']); |
| assert.deepStrictEqual(parseQuery('q=a+b').q, ['a b']); |
| }); |
| |
| test('empty query is an empty object', () => { |
| assert.deepStrictEqual(parseQuery(''), {}); |
| assert.deepStrictEqual(parseQuery('?'), {}); |
| }); |
| |
| test('first() returns the leading value', () => { |
| assert.strictEqual(first(parseQuery('tag=a&tag=b'), 'tag'), 'a'); |
| assert.strictEqual(first(parseQuery(''), 'tag'), undefined); |
| }); |
| '''}) |
|
|
| |
| make(ROUTER, "header-case-sensitive", |
| spec("typescript", "logic", 3, """ |
| Header lookups miss depending on which client sent the request. |
| |
| Clients that send `content-type` are handled; clients that send `Content-Type` |
| are treated as though the header were absent, and our content negotiation then |
| falls back to a default. Both spellings mean the same thing over HTTP. |
| """), |
| [("src/headers.ts", |
| """ private static key(name: string): string { |
| return name.toLowerCase(); |
| }""", |
| """ private static key(name: string): string { |
| return name; |
| }""")], |
| {"headers.test.ts": ''' |
| import { test } from 'node:test'; |
| import assert from 'node:assert'; |
| import { Headers } from '../src/index.ts'; |
| |
| test('lookup ignores case', () => { |
| const h = new Headers({ 'Content-Type': 'text/html' }); |
| assert.strictEqual(h.get('content-type'), 'text/html'); |
| assert.strictEqual(h.get('CONTENT-TYPE'), 'text/html'); |
| assert.strictEqual(h.get('Content-Type'), 'text/html'); |
| }); |
| |
| test('has ignores case', () => { |
| const h = new Headers({ 'X-Trace': '1' }); |
| assert.ok(h.has('x-trace')); |
| assert.ok(h.has('X-TRACE')); |
| }); |
| |
| test('setting twice in different cases replaces', () => { |
| const h = new Headers(); |
| h.set('Accept', 'a'); |
| h.set('accept', 'b'); |
| assert.strictEqual(h.get('ACCEPT'), 'b'); |
| assert.deepStrictEqual(h.names(), ['accept']); |
| }); |
| |
| test('append across cases accumulates on one field', () => { |
| const h = new Headers(); |
| h.append('Set-Cookie', 'a=1'); |
| h.append('set-cookie', 'b=2'); |
| assert.deepStrictEqual(h.all('SET-COOKIE'), ['a=1', 'b=2']); |
| }); |
| |
| test('delete ignores case', () => { |
| const h = new Headers({ 'X-A': '1' }); |
| assert.ok(h.delete('x-a')); |
| assert.ok(!h.has('X-A')); |
| }); |
| |
| test('names are normalised', () => { |
| const h = new Headers({ 'Content-Type': 'a', 'X-Trace': 'b' }); |
| assert.deepStrictEqual(h.names(), ['content-type', 'x-trace']); |
| }); |
| |
| test('values keep their own case', () => { |
| const h = new Headers({ 'Content-Type': 'Text/HTML' }); |
| assert.strictEqual(h.get('content-type'), 'Text/HTML'); |
| }); |
| |
| test('all() returns a copy', () => { |
| const h = new Headers({ 'A': '1' }); |
| h.all('a').push('2'); |
| assert.deepStrictEqual(h.all('a'), ['1']); |
| }); |
| '''}) |
|
|
| print("done") |
|
|