junidude14 commited on
Commit
b2385ea
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 0493510

Archive 4 checkpoints (1-4)

Browse files
paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261008T060837Z-deck-new-figure-split-time/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/data/fig3_time_days.csv ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ cohort,cv_scsemi_gpu_h,cv_lora_gpu_h,cv_scsemi_running_h,cv_scsemi_gpu_waits_excluded_h,draws_scsemi_gpu_h,draws_lora_gpu_h,cv_ratio
2
+ immicro,23.73,1.225,27.22,20.66,11.72,0.6962,19.38
3
+ ye2026_sepsis,38.47,0.618,40.76,11.43,20.32,0.5589,62.26
4
+ imperial_eskd,30.89,0.5158,33.24,0,19.12,0.8999,59.89
5
+ giroux2022,14.44,0.2961,15.1,38.47,12.97,0.2208,48.77
6
+ ji2025_chili,7.397,0.3697,8.25,0,4.756,0.2829,20.01
paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261008T060837Z-deck-new-figure-split-time/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/data/fig3_time_days_slide_text.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "section": "fig3-time",
3
+ "scripts": [
4
+ "/home/sj_server_1/PBISC/immun-pbmc-fm/model_8_sparse_data_diffusion/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/tools/fig3_time_days.py"
5
+ ],
6
+ "generated_from": "tools/fig3_time_days.py (rerun to refresh; do not edit by hand)",
7
+ "slides": [
8
+ {
9
+ "title": "Time: days for scSemiProfiler, minutes for LoRA",
10
+ "layout": "full",
11
+ "figures": [
12
+ "/home/sj_server_1/PBISC/immun-pbmc-fm/model_8_sparse_data_diffusion/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/figures/fig3_time_days.png"
13
+ ],
14
+ "keywords": [
15
+ "Healthy 5-fold: 1.0 GPU-day vs 1.2 h",
16
+ "Up to 1.6 days per cohort (Sepsis)",
17
+ "All runs: 7.7 days vs 22 h with pretraining"
18
+ ],
19
+ "footnote_short": "One GB10 GPU, job alone on it. GPU time from receipts; waits for the GPU excluded.",
20
+ "footnote": "GPU time on one GB10 GPU with every step alone on the GPU, from each run's receipts. One 5–fold experiment = the five fold models, every usable sample tested once by the model that never trained on it. scSemiProfiler = pretraining of every representative (two stages) + one model per test sample (upstream c2aea02, default settings); PBISC LoRA = fine–tune + sampling 1,500 cells per test sample. Ratio per cohort: 19–62x. scSemiProfiler running time including its CPU steps (waits for the GPU excluded): ImMicro (healthy) 27 h; Sepsis 41 h; Imperial 33 h; Giroux 15 h; Ji (whole blood) 8 h. All runs = 5–fold + the 25 five–donor draws: scSemiProfiler 184 h, LoRA 5.7 h; PBISC's pretraining (15.9 h, 33.1 M cells) is done once and reused by every cohort. Not counted on either side: data preparation and scoring. The equal–pair–budget scSemiProfiler runs are not included (they reuse the 5–fold run's representative models). Sources: data/sec09_same_pairs.csv, data/sec09_time_to_apply.csv, data/sec06_ft_method.csv, scsemi/work/<cohort>/cv/fold<k>/events.jsonl.",
21
+ "numbers": [
22
+ {
23
+ "value": "ImMicro (healthy): 5-fold scSemiProfiler 23.7 GPU h (0.99 days, running 27.2 h) vs LoRA 1.22 h (19x); 5-donor draws 11.7 h vs 0.70 h; Sepsis: 5-fold scSemiProfiler 38.5 GPU h (1.60 days, running 40.8 h) vs LoRA 0.62 h (62x); 5-donor draws 20.3 h vs 0.56 h; Imperial: 5-fold scSemiProfiler 30.9 GPU h (1.29 days, running 33.2 h) vs LoRA 0.52 h (60x); 5-donor draws 19.1 h vs 0.90 h; Giroux: 5-fold scSemiProfiler 14.4 GPU h (0.60 days, running 15.1 h) vs LoRA 0.30 h (49x); 5-donor draws 13.0 h vs 0.22 h; Ji (whole blood): 5-fold scSemiProfiler 7.4 GPU h (0.31 days, running 8.3 h) vs LoRA 0.37 h (20x); 5-donor draws 4.8 h vs 0.28 h",
24
+ "source": "data/fig3_time_days.csv"
25
+ },
26
+ {
27
+ "value": "all runs: scSemiProfiler 183.8 GPU h (7.66 days); PBISC LoRA 5.68 h + pretraining 15.9 h once",
28
+ "source": "data/fig3_time_days.csv"
29
+ }
30
+ ]
31
+ }
32
+ ]
33
+ }
paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261008T060837Z-deck-new-figure-split-time/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/data/figure_plan.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,369 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source": "Nature Style Manuscript Writing.pdf (paper-release-20260928/reference-papers): six main figures, up to 17 supplementary. User decisions of 2026-10-06: no PBISC-VAE; scSemiProfiler, a VAE-based method, is the comparison. User decisions of 2026-10-08 (supersede the earlier figure split): Fig. 2 shows no disease metrics; Fig. 3 compares with scSemiProfiler on healthy samples, with time as a main result; Figs 4-6 use the disease cohorts: Fig. 4 disease benchmarks (PBISC versions, scSemiProfiler, and BayesPrism / CIBERSORTx labelled as cell-type deconvolution), Fig. 5 rare-cell fractions and detection, Fig. 6 new findings from the bulk-only sepsis and COVID samples (K = 1,000 and 4,000).",
3
+ "status_legend": {
4
+ "Ready": "slide exists and fits the panel",
5
+ "Adapt": "slide exists; change its scope or style",
6
+ "Draft": "new draft exists, not yet approved",
7
+ "Build": "results exist; no slide yet",
8
+ "Run": "needs a new analysis or experiment",
9
+ "Plan": "not planned yet"
10
+ },
11
+ "figures": [
12
+ {
13
+ "n": 1,
14
+ "title": "Design and performance of PBISC",
15
+ "claim": "Diffusion on each gene's value and detection, conditioned on bulk, writes realistic blood cells.",
16
+ "panels": [
17
+ {
18
+ "p": "a",
19
+ "content": "Backbones compared: scDiffusion, SDD, PBISC-Diffusion",
20
+ "evidence": [
21
+ "Backbone: SDD → PBISC-Diffusion"
22
+ ],
23
+ "status": "Ready"
24
+ },
25
+ {
26
+ "p": "b",
27
+ "content": "Overview: pretraining, diffusion, generation",
28
+ "evidence": [
29
+ "Overview draft (Nature style)"
30
+ ],
31
+ "status": "Draft"
32
+ },
33
+ {
34
+ "p": "c",
35
+ "content": "What the bulk condition contains",
36
+ "evidence": [
37
+ "Bulk conditioning"
38
+ ],
39
+ "status": "Ready"
40
+ },
41
+ {
42
+ "p": "d",
43
+ "content": "Pretraining corpus: assays, conditions, cell types",
44
+ "evidence": [
45
+ "Pretraining corpus"
46
+ ],
47
+ "status": "Ready"
48
+ },
49
+ {
50
+ "p": "e",
51
+ "content": "Width and context: lower loss, same biology",
52
+ "evidence": [
53
+ "Width & context ablation: loss saturation",
54
+ "Width & context ablation: benchmark"
55
+ ],
56
+ "status": "Ready"
57
+ },
58
+ {
59
+ "p": "f",
60
+ "content": "Gene panel: 2k, 3k, 6k, 15k",
61
+ "evidence": [
62
+ "Gene context: 2k / 3k / 6k / 15k"
63
+ ],
64
+ "status": "Ready"
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "candidates": [],
68
+ "details": [
69
+ "PBISC-Diffusion: bulk in, cells out",
70
+ "Denoiser: joint value + support diffusion"
71
+ ]
72
+ },
73
+ {
74
+ "n": 2,
75
+ "title": "Fine-tuning PBISC with LoRA",
76
+ "claim": "On a healthy cohort, a few pairs and a LoRA of minutes give cells close to the real ones. No disease metrics.",
77
+ "panels": [
78
+ {
79
+ "p": "a",
80
+ "content": "Real bulk differs from the training input",
81
+ "evidence": [
82
+ "Real bulk ≠ pseudobulk (model input)",
83
+ "Same shift in three paired cohorts"
84
+ ],
85
+ "status": "Ready"
86
+ },
87
+ {
88
+ "p": "b",
89
+ "content": "Without fine-tuning, cells fall off the real manifold",
90
+ "evidence": [
91
+ "Consequence: cells off-manifold"
92
+ ],
93
+ "status": "Ready"
94
+ },
95
+ {
96
+ "p": "c",
97
+ "content": "LoRA on paired bulk and cells; how it is tested",
98
+ "evidence": [
99
+ "Fine-tuning with paired bulk + sc",
100
+ "Evaluation design"
101
+ ],
102
+ "status": "Adapt",
103
+ "note": "design example: ImMicro instead of sepsis"
104
+ },
105
+ {
106
+ "p": "d",
107
+ "content": "How generated cells are scored (cells and composition)",
108
+ "evidence": [
109
+ "How we score generated cells"
110
+ ],
111
+ "status": "Adapt",
112
+ "note": "disease rows move to Fig. 4"
113
+ },
114
+ {
115
+ "p": "e",
116
+ "content": "Healthy cohort: precision, coverage, composition",
117
+ "evidence": [
118
+ "5-fold CV: train on the other 4 folds"
119
+ ],
120
+ "status": "Adapt",
121
+ "note": "ImMicro only; drop the disease columns"
122
+ },
123
+ {
124
+ "p": "f",
125
+ "content": "Healthy cohort: classifier AUROC, MMD, E_N",
126
+ "evidence": [
127
+ "5-fold: realism beyond precision/coverage"
128
+ ],
129
+ "status": "Adapt",
130
+ "note": "ImMicro only"
131
+ },
132
+ {
133
+ "p": "g",
134
+ "content": "Full, LoRA and condition-encoder fine-tuning",
135
+ "evidence": [
136
+ "Full vs LoRA vs cond.-encoder-only"
137
+ ],
138
+ "status": "Adapt",
139
+ "note": "ImMicro only; no logFC"
140
+ },
141
+ {
142
+ "p": "h",
143
+ "content": "How many pairs are needed",
144
+ "evidence": [
145
+ "Pairs needed: composition, coverage, training steps"
146
+ ],
147
+ "status": "Adapt",
148
+ "note": "ImMicro only; scSemiProfiler diamonds go to Fig. 3"
149
+ },
150
+ {
151
+ "p": "i",
152
+ "content": "LoRA rank and K choices",
153
+ "evidence": [
154
+ "LoRA rank: r = 4, 16, 64",
155
+ "K diversification: no gain"
156
+ ],
157
+ "status": "Adapt",
158
+ "note": "ImMicro only; supplementary candidate"
159
+ }
160
+ ],
161
+ "candidates": [],
162
+ "details": []
163
+ },
164
+ {
165
+ "n": 3,
166
+ "title": "PBISC vs scSemiProfiler on healthy donors",
167
+ "claim": "On healthy donors, LoRA cells are closer to the real ones than scSemiProfiler's, in minutes instead of days.",
168
+ "panels": [
169
+ {
170
+ "p": "a",
171
+ "content": "Five donors: generated cells and realism",
172
+ "evidence": [
173
+ "5 donors: LoRA vs scSemiProfiler — cells",
174
+ "5 donors: realism beyond precision/coverage",
175
+ "5 donors: precision/coverage at k = 3, 5, 10"
176
+ ],
177
+ "status": "Adapt",
178
+ "note": "ImMicro only"
179
+ },
180
+ {
181
+ "p": "b",
182
+ "content": "Same training pairs (5-fold) and equal pair budget (5-40)",
183
+ "evidence": [
184
+ "Same training pairs: LoRA vs scSemiProfiler"
185
+ ],
186
+ "status": "Adapt",
187
+ "note": "ImMicro only; add the n = 5-40 budget runs"
188
+ },
189
+ {
190
+ "p": "c",
191
+ "content": "scSemiProfiler copies its representative",
192
+ "evidence": [
193
+ "scSemiProfiler copies its representative"
194
+ ],
195
+ "status": "Adapt",
196
+ "note": "ImMicro only"
197
+ },
198
+ {
199
+ "p": "d",
200
+ "content": "Time: GPU hours and days per experiment",
201
+ "evidence": [
202
+ "Time: days for scSemiProfiler, minutes for LoRA",
203
+ "5 donors: time to apply"
204
+ ],
205
+ "status": "Ready",
206
+ "note": "all cohorts shown: time is a property of the method"
207
+ }
208
+ ],
209
+ "candidates": [],
210
+ "details": []
211
+ },
212
+ {
213
+ "n": 4,
214
+ "title": "Disease signal on paired cohorts",
215
+ "claim": "LoRA cells recover the paired single cells' disease signal; compared with other PBISC versions, scSemiProfiler and deconvolution.",
216
+ "panels": [
217
+ {
218
+ "p": "a",
219
+ "content": "Five paired cohorts",
220
+ "evidence": [
221
+ "Five paired cohorts"
222
+ ],
223
+ "status": "Ready"
224
+ },
225
+ {
226
+ "p": "b",
227
+ "content": "PBISC versions on the disease benchmarks: LoRA best",
228
+ "evidence": [],
229
+ "status": "Build",
230
+ "note": "zero-shot, calibration, sc-only, full FT, ranks, multi-K; data exist"
231
+ },
232
+ {
233
+ "p": "c",
234
+ "content": "LoRA vs scSemiProfiler: disease logFC, DEG",
235
+ "evidence": [
236
+ "5 donors: LoRA vs scSemiProfiler — disease signal",
237
+ "Pairs needed: donor and disease signal"
238
+ ],
239
+ "status": "Adapt",
240
+ "note": "add the 5-fold same-pairs disease columns"
241
+ },
242
+ {
243
+ "p": "d",
244
+ "content": "Disease genes at every list length (CAT)",
245
+ "evidence": [
246
+ "Disease genes at every list length (CAT)"
247
+ ],
248
+ "status": "Ready"
249
+ },
250
+ {
251
+ "p": "e",
252
+ "content": "vs BayesPrism and CIBERSORTx (cell-type deconvolution)",
253
+ "evidence": [
254
+ "Deconvolution with the same pairs: disease signal"
255
+ ],
256
+ "status": "Adapt",
257
+ "note": "label as cell-type deconvolution in the title"
258
+ },
259
+ {
260
+ "p": "f",
261
+ "content": "Lupus benchmark (sc-pseudobulk input) and the bulk broadcast",
262
+ "evidence": [
263
+ "SLE benchmark: PBISC vs scSemiProfiler",
264
+ "SLE benchmark: per cell type",
265
+ "Bulk broadcast baseline"
266
+ ],
267
+ "status": "Ready",
268
+ "note": "moved from Fig. 3"
269
+ }
270
+ ],
271
+ "candidates": [],
272
+ "details": [
273
+ "Deconvolution with the same pairs: composition"
274
+ ]
275
+ },
276
+ {
277
+ "n": 5,
278
+ "title": "Rare cell states in disease cohorts",
279
+ "claim": "LoRA cells carry rare disease states near their observed fractions, in the donors that have them.",
280
+ "panels": [
281
+ {
282
+ "p": "a",
283
+ "content": "Rare-state fractions, generated vs observed, four paired cohorts",
284
+ "evidence": [],
285
+ "status": "Run",
286
+ "note": "LoRA, scSemiProfiler, zero-shot; BayesPrism states where defined"
287
+ },
288
+ {
289
+ "p": "b",
290
+ "content": "Finding rare states: per-donor detection",
291
+ "evidence": [],
292
+ "status": "Run",
293
+ "note": "donors with vs without the state"
294
+ },
295
+ {
296
+ "p": "c",
297
+ "content": "Behçet: C1Q-high monocytes from real bulk",
298
+ "evidence": [
299
+ "Consequence: disease direction flips"
300
+ ],
301
+ "status": "Adapt",
302
+ "note": "add the LoRA-3 result (C1Q-high BD > HC)"
303
+ },
304
+ {
305
+ "p": "d",
306
+ "content": "Diseases absent from the corpus: Kawasaki MS1, SLE ISG-high T",
307
+ "evidence": [],
308
+ "status": "Build",
309
+ "note": "rare_states_screen_20261004 results"
310
+ }
311
+ ],
312
+ "candidates": [],
313
+ "details": []
314
+ },
315
+ {
316
+ "n": 6,
317
+ "title": "Discovery from public bulk-only data",
318
+ "claim": "New findings from LoRA cells of bulk-only sepsis and COVID dialysis samples (K = 1,000 and 4,000).",
319
+ "panels": [
320
+ {
321
+ "p": "a",
322
+ "content": "Bulk-only samples generated: sepsis 122, COVID dialysis 164",
323
+ "evidence": [
324
+ "Next: cohorts with a paired subset (planned)"
325
+ ],
326
+ "status": "Adapt",
327
+ "note": "update: K = 1,000 and 4,000 done"
328
+ },
329
+ {
330
+ "p": "b",
331
+ "content": "New findings",
332
+ "evidence": [],
333
+ "status": "Run",
334
+ "note": "earlier screen: 0 confirmed beyond the bulk"
335
+ }
336
+ ],
337
+ "candidates": [],
338
+ "details": []
339
+ }
340
+ ],
341
+ "supplementary": {
342
+ "slides": [
343
+ "Pairs from other cohorts do not transfer",
344
+ "Longer training on other cohorts: gap stays",
345
+ "No pretraining: same cohort, from scratch",
346
+ "No pretraining: other cohorts, from scratch",
347
+ "Rare states: from scratch vs pretrained"
348
+ ],
349
+ "planned": [
350
+ {
351
+ "p": "S",
352
+ "content": "Influenza exposure from raw clinical bulk (Randolph)",
353
+ "evidence": [],
354
+ "status": "Build",
355
+ "note": "manuscript result; placement open"
356
+ }
357
+ ],
358
+ "notes": {
359
+ "Pairs from other cohorts do not transfer": "moved from Fig. 5; placement open",
360
+ "Longer training on other cohorts: gap stays": "moved from Fig. 5; placement open"
361
+ }
362
+ },
363
+ "appendix": [
364
+ "Appendix: scSemiProfiler without output threshold"
365
+ ],
366
+ "discussion": [
367
+ "Next: other tissues from a few dozen pairs"
368
+ ]
369
+ }
paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261008T060837Z-deck-new-figure-split-time/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/figures/figplan_supp.png ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 519b5ca95c58e6b14e3cf60ea6769ff2eedb14ca5c8196c396751218f68781d1
  • Pointer size: 131 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 234 kB