junidude14 commited on
Commit
d390bed
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 56e4278

Archive 4 checkpoints (1-4)

Browse files
paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261013T072655Z-enriched-140-slide-master/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/data/figure_enrichment_20261013/qa/contact11.png ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: d58a7e5a1a06909988b11146dcd8b0731352600f7b70613a02a902e8e4c1ca53
  • Pointer size: 131 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 626 kB
paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261013T072655Z-enriched-140-slide-master/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/data/figure_enrichment_20261013/qa/contact12.png ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: c950be6a4a9de4b13fcd41e7e11b0fd87713786c20a3d3a29c0af887769594a8
  • Pointer size: 131 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 299 kB
paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261013T072655Z-enriched-140-slide-master/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/data/figure_enrichment_20261013/render.log ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ 7 right fig 9.20x4.86 in Experimental overview
2
+ 8 below fig 12.45x2.62 in Pretraining corpus
3
+ 9 below fig 12.38x5.33 in Corpus scale and generation workflow
4
+ 10 none fig 12.45x4.07 in From Gaussian noise to generated cell states
5
+ 13 none fig 12.45x5.67 in Where context width and trunk width change
6
+ 14 none fig 12.45x5.67 in Predicted and oracle hints: one trained denoiser
7
+ 15 none fig 12.45x5.67 in Architecture: full and late validation progression
8
+ 16 below fig 9.57x4.63 in Width & context ablation: benchmark
9
+ 17 none fig 12.45x5.67 in Architecture arms: dimensions and endpoints
10
+ 18 below fig 9.57x4.63 in Gene context: 2k / 3k / 6k / 15k
11
+ 19 none fig 12.45x5.67 in Gene panels: progression relative to each endpoint
12
+ 20 none fig 12.45x5.67 in Gene-panel arms: exact sizes and training provenance
13
+ 21 none fig 12.45x5.67 in All ablation arms: parameters and training time
14
+ 22 none fig 12.15x5.70 in Real-cell repeat: a sampling reference
15
+ 23 none fig 12.45x5.47 in Native-pseudobulk model comparisons
16
+ 26 none fig 11.76x5.70 in Bulk and pooled cells: different expression values
17
+ 27 none fig 12.45x5.18 in Paired calibration reduces same-donor expression error
18
+ 28 below fig 10.47x4.63 in Consequence: cells off-manifold
19
+ 29 none fig 12.15x5.70 in Healthy paired data: full FT and LoRA
20
+ 30 none fig 12.45x5.40 in Full FT and LoRA ranks: quality and parameters
21
+ 31 right fig 9.20x5.63 in Healthy paired-data budget: n training + 7 validation
22
+ 32 right fig 9.20x5.17 in Five pairs, no extra validation: LoRA vs scSemi
23
+ 33 none fig 12.17x5.70 in Composition: error and donor-level wins
24
+ 36 right fig 9.20x5.18 in Disease signals with five training donors
25
+ 37 right fig 9.20x4.80 in 5-fold CV: disease signal
26
+ 38 below fig 11.93x4.63 in Disease genes at every list length (CAT)
27
+ 39 below fig 10.54x4.63 in Cell-type deconvolution, same pairs: disease signal
28
+ 47 below fig 12.45x4.61 in Backbone: SDD → PBISC-Diffusion
29
+ 48 below fig 12.45x4.61 in Bulk conditioning
30
+ 49 below fig 11.68x5.33 in Denoiser: joint value + support diffusion
31
+ 50 below fig 12.45x4.71 in Fine-tuning with paired bulk + sc
32
+ 51 below fig 12.35x4.63 in Evaluation design
33
+ 52 below fig 11.19x4.63 in How we score generated cells
34
+ 53 none fig 12.45x5.31 in Does the model follow its bulk conditioning?
35
+ 54 below fig 10.30x4.63 in SLE benchmark: PBISC vs scSemiProfiler
36
+ 55 below fig 10.79x4.63 in SLE benchmark: per cell type
37
+ 56 none fig 12.45x5.38 in Disjoint-cell controls test the bulk-broadcast baseline
38
+ 57 none fig 12.45x5.60 in SLE: what is added beyond the bulk broadcast?
39
+ 58 below fig 12.45x5.24 in Same shift in three paired cohorts
40
+ 59 none fig 12.45x5.64 in Input corrections on one real-reference UMAP
41
+ 60 none fig 12.45x4.86 in Where generated-cell density differs from real cells
42
+ 61 none fig 12.45x4.89 in Input calibration changes cell-type composition
43
+ 62 none fig 12.45x5.63 in Same noise, different input: matched-cell shifts
44
+ 63 none fig 12.45x4.76 in Matched noise separates cell state from cell identity
45
+ 64 none fig 12.45x5.63 in Input changes can switch the generated cell label
46
+ 65 none fig 12.45x5.58 in Nearest real cells: distance and label agreement
47
+ 66 none fig 12.45x5.52 in Composition agreement does not ensure state agreement
48
+ 67 none fig 12.45x5.47 in Gene-length effects in the bulk input
49
+ 68 none fig 12.45x5.47 in Gene-length effects within label-stable cells
50
+ 69 none fig 12.45x5.41 in Raw and TPM shifts persist within cell labels
51
+ 70 none fig 12.40x5.70 in Reference calibration leaves specific gene-state shifts
52
+ 71 none fig 12.45x5.45 in Donor trait axes and donor identification differ
53
+ 72 none fig 12.45x4.61 in Reference choice changes different quality endpoints
54
+ 74 none fig 12.45x4.72 in Technical repeats and follow-up are different controls
55
+ 75 none fig 12.45x5.32 in Annotation agreement and difficult categories
56
+ 76 none fig 12.45x5.39 in Depth matching changes precision and coverage
57
+ 77 none fig 12.45x4.87 in Detection and library size are separate diagnostics
58
+ 78 right fig 9.20x5.18 in Healthy cohort: LoRA cells cover the real ones
59
+ 79 right fig 9.20x4.79 in Healthy cohort: realism beyond precision/coverage
60
+ 80 right fig 9.20x5.14 in Healthy cohort: full vs LoRA vs condition encoder
61
+ 81 below fig 9.37x4.63 in Representative-dependent composition
62
+ 82 below fig 11.39x4.63 in Full vs LoRA vs cond.-encoder-only
63
+ 83 right fig 9.20x5.09 in Healthy cohort: LoRA rank and K
64
+ 84 right fig 9.20x5.09 in Healthy paired-data learning curves
65
+ 85 right fig 9.20x4.66 in Time: days for scSemiProfiler, minutes for LoRA
66
+ 86 below fig 10.77x4.63 in 5 donors: time to apply
67
+ 87 below fig 9.99x4.63 in Pairs needed: composition, coverage, training steps
68
+ 88 below fig 10.08x4.63 in LoRA rank: r = 4, 16, 64
69
+ 89 right fig 8.31x5.70 in K diversification: no gain
70
+ 90 below fig 12.45x3.82 in Five paired cohorts
71
+ 91 none fig 12.45x4.70 in Sepsis: exact-five reconstruction across five draws
72
+ 92 none fig 12.45x5.18 in Sepsis: realism beyond precision and coverage
73
+ 93 none fig 12.45x4.70 in Imperial: first completed exact-five comparison
74
+ 94 below fig 10.01x4.63 in 5 donors: LoRA vs scSemiProfiler — cells
75
+ 95 below fig 10.04x4.63 in 5 donors: realism beyond precision/coverage
76
+ 96 below fig 10.02x4.63 in 5 donors: precision/coverage at k = 3, 5, 10
77
+ 97 below fig 10.09x4.63 in 5-fold: realism beyond precision/coverage
78
+ 98 below fig 11.74x4.63 in Same training pairs: LoRA vs scSemiProfiler
79
+ 99 below fig 11.85x4.63 in scSemiProfiler and the representative-copy baseline
80
+ 100 none fig 10.46x5.70 in Sepsis: patient-aware disease-gene agreement
81
+ 101 none fig 10.46x5.70 in Imperial: patient-aware disease-gene agreement
82
+ 102 below fig 10.60x4.63 in Sepsis: fine-tuning variants
83
+ 103 right fig 8.44x5.70 in Pairs needed: donor and disease signal
84
+ 104 below fig 10.53x4.63 in Cell-type deconvolution, same pairs: composition
85
+ 105 none fig 12.45x4.94 in Deconvolution: expression coverage limits the comparison
86
+ 106 none fig 12.45x5.08 in K=4,000 recipe: paired reconstruction quality
87
+ 107 none fig 12.45x5.08 in K=4,000 recipe: disease signal does not improve uniformly
88
+ 108 none fig 12.45x5.22 in K=4,000 recipe: calibration gains are selective
89
+ 109 none fig 12.45x4.66 in Influenza: response order versus response genes
90
+ 110 none fig 10.30x5.70 in COVID: calibration on a shared real-cell map
91
+ 111 none fig 10.82x5.70 in COVID monocytes: direction after depth matching
92
+ 112 none fig 11.44x5.70 in COVID monocytes: direction, magnitude and null
93
+ 113 none fig 11.44x5.70 in COVID CD14 monocytes: direction, magnitude and null
94
+ 114 none fig 12.45x5.02 in COVID: biological endpoints give a mixed verdict
95
+ 115 none fig 11.83x5.70 in Rare-state frequencies in observed cells
96
+ 116 none fig 11.35x5.70 in Rare-state misses: rules 1–8
97
+ 117 none fig 11.72x5.70 in Rare-state misses: rules 9–15
98
+ 118 none fig 12.06x5.70 in Rare-state fidelity: zero-aware reanalysis
99
+ 119 none fig 10.76x5.70 in Sepsis rare states across paired-data budgets
100
+ 120 none fig 12.45x5.62 in Sepsis rare-state direction across support budgets
101
+ 121 none fig 11.35x5.70 in Rare-state screen in DRESS, Kawasaki and SLE
102
+ 122 right fig 7.24x5.70 in Consequence: disease direction flips
103
+ 123 none fig 12.45x5.18 in C1Q: single-gene detection versus co-detection
104
+ 124 none fig 12.45x4.55 in Behçet: K=4,000 changes direction more than identity
105
+ 125 none fig 12.45x5.59 in Behcet: one-gene and multi-gene C1Q rules
106
+ 126 below fig 9.46x4.63 in Pairs from other cohorts do not transfer
107
+ 127 below fig 9.44x4.63 in Longer training on other cohorts: gap stays
108
+ 128 below fig 10.61x4.63 in No pretraining: same cohort, from scratch
109
+ 129 below fig 10.53x4.63 in No pretraining: other cohorts, from scratch
110
+ 130 below fig 10.20x4.63 in Rare states: from scratch vs pretrained
111
+ 131 below fig 10.12x4.63 in Appendix: scSemiProfiler without output threshold
112
+ 132 none fig 12.45x5.28 in Bulk-only exploration: calibration populations differ
113
+ 134 right fig 9.20x5.19 in Rare-state fractions: original analysis
114
+ 135 right fig 9.20x5.01 in Rare-state ranking: original analysis
115
+ 136 below fig 9.23x4.98 in Rare states: original five-fold analysis
116
+ 137 right fig 8.01x5.70 in Bulk-only cohort plan: original snapshot
117
+ 138 none fig 12.45x4.73 in Historical bulk-only search: no confirmed new finding
118
+ 140 below fig 12.45x4.62 in Next: other tissues from a few dozen pairs
119
+ {"slides": 140, "groups": {"Introduction": [1, 2, 3, 4], "Figure 1": [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10], "Figure 2": [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23], "Figure 3": [24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33], "Figure 4": [34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39], "Figure 5": [40, 41], "Figure 6": [42, 43, 44], "Supplementary": [45, 46], "Supp S01": [47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52], "Supp S02": [53, 54, 55, 56, 57], "Supp S03": [58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72], "Supp S04": [73, 74, 75, 76, 77], "Supp S05": [78, 79, 80, 81, 82], "Supp S06": [83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89], "Supp S07": [90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99], "Supp S08": [100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108], "Supp S09": [109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114], "Supp S10": [115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120], "Supp S11": [121, 122, 123, 124, 125], "Supp S12": [126, 127, 128, 129, 130], "Supp S13": [131], "Supp S14": [132], "Historical archive": [133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138], "Discussion": [139, 140]}, "pptx": "/home/sj_server_1/PBISC/immun-pbmc-fm/model_8_sparse_data_diffusion/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/PBISC-Diffusion_expanded_master_20261013_enriched.pptx"}
120
+ convert /home/sj_server_1/PBISC/immun-pbmc-fm/model_8_sparse_data_diffusion/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/PBISC-Diffusion_expanded_master_20261013_enriched.pptx as a Impress document -> /home/sj_server_1/PBISC/immun-pbmc-fm/model_8_sparse_data_diffusion/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/PBISC-Diffusion_expanded_master_20261013_enriched.pdf using filter : impress_pdf_Export:{"UseTaggedPDF":{"type":"boolean","value":"false"},"PDFUACompliance":{"type":"boolean","value":"false"}}
121
+ Overwriting: /home/sj_server_1/PBISC/immun-pbmc-fm/model_8_sparse_data_diffusion/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/PBISC-Diffusion_expanded_master_20261013_enriched.pdf
122
+ {"pass": true, "counts": {"spec": 140, "pptx": 140, "pdf": 140}, "failures": [], "contacts": 12}
123
+ 7 right fig 9.20x4.86 in Experimental overview
124
+ 8 below fig 12.45x2.62 in Pretraining corpus
125
+ 9 below fig 12.38x5.33 in Corpus scale and generation workflow
126
+ 10 none fig 12.45x4.07 in From Gaussian noise to generated cell states
127
+ 13 none fig 12.45x5.67 in Where context width and trunk width change
128
+ 14 none fig 12.45x5.67 in Predicted and oracle hints: one trained denoiser
129
+ 15 none fig 12.45x5.67 in Architecture: full and late validation progression
130
+ 16 below fig 9.57x4.63 in Width & context ablation: benchmark
131
+ 17 none fig 12.45x5.67 in Architecture arms: dimensions and endpoints
132
+ 18 below fig 9.57x4.63 in Gene context: 2k / 3k / 6k / 15k
133
+ 19 none fig 12.45x5.67 in Gene panels: progression relative to each endpoint
134
+ 20 none fig 12.45x5.67 in Gene-panel arms: exact sizes and training provenance
135
+ 21 none fig 12.45x5.67 in All ablation arms: parameters and training time
136
+ 22 none fig 12.15x5.70 in Real-cell repeat: a sampling reference
137
+ 23 none fig 12.45x5.47 in Native-pseudobulk model comparisons
138
+ 26 none fig 11.76x5.70 in Bulk and pooled cells: different expression values
139
+ 27 none fig 12.45x5.18 in Paired calibration reduces same-donor expression error
140
+ 28 below fig 10.47x4.63 in Consequence: cells off-manifold
141
+ 29 none fig 12.15x5.70 in Healthy paired data: full FT and LoRA
142
+ 30 none fig 12.45x5.40 in Full FT and LoRA ranks: quality and parameters
143
+ 31 right fig 9.20x5.63 in Healthy paired-data budget: n training + 7 validation
144
+ 32 right fig 9.20x5.17 in Five pairs, no extra validation: LoRA vs scSemi
145
+ 33 none fig 12.17x5.70 in Composition: error and donor-level wins
146
+ 36 right fig 9.20x5.18 in Disease signals with five training donors
147
+ 37 right fig 9.20x4.80 in 5-fold CV: disease signal
148
+ 38 below fig 11.93x4.63 in Disease genes at every list length (CAT)
149
+ 39 below fig 10.54x4.63 in Cell-type deconvolution, same pairs: disease signal
150
+ 47 below fig 12.45x4.61 in Backbone: SDD → PBISC-Diffusion
151
+ 48 below fig 12.45x4.61 in Bulk conditioning
152
+ 49 below fig 11.68x5.33 in Denoiser: joint value + support diffusion
153
+ 50 below fig 12.45x4.71 in Fine-tuning with paired bulk + sc
154
+ 51 below fig 12.35x4.63 in Evaluation design
155
+ 52 below fig 11.19x4.63 in How we score generated cells
156
+ 53 none fig 12.45x5.31 in Does the model follow its bulk conditioning?
157
+ 54 below fig 10.30x4.63 in SLE benchmark: PBISC vs scSemiProfiler
158
+ 55 below fig 10.79x4.63 in SLE benchmark: per cell type
159
+ 56 none fig 12.45x5.38 in Disjoint-cell controls test the bulk-broadcast baseline
160
+ 57 none fig 12.45x5.60 in SLE: what is added beyond the bulk broadcast?
161
+ 58 below fig 12.45x5.24 in Same shift in three paired cohorts
162
+ 59 none fig 12.45x5.64 in Input corrections on one real-reference UMAP
163
+ 60 none fig 12.45x4.86 in Where generated-cell density differs from real cells
164
+ 61 none fig 12.45x4.89 in Input calibration changes cell-type composition
165
+ 62 none fig 12.45x5.63 in Same noise, different input: matched-cell shifts
166
+ 63 none fig 12.45x4.76 in Matched noise separates cell state from cell identity
167
+ 64 none fig 12.45x5.63 in Input changes can switch the generated cell label
168
+ 65 none fig 12.45x5.58 in Nearest real cells: distance and label agreement
169
+ 66 none fig 12.34x5.70 in Composition agreement does not ensure state agreement
170
+ 67 none fig 12.45x5.47 in Gene-length effects in the bulk input
171
+ 68 none fig 12.45x5.47 in Gene-length effects within label-stable cells
172
+ 69 none fig 12.45x5.41 in Raw and TPM shifts persist within cell labels
173
+ 70 none fig 12.40x5.70 in Reference calibration leaves specific gene-state shifts
174
+ 71 none fig 12.45x5.45 in Donor trait axes and donor identification differ
175
+ 72 none fig 12.45x4.61 in Reference choice changes different quality endpoints
176
+ 74 none fig 12.45x4.72 in Technical repeats and follow-up are different controls
177
+ 75 none fig 12.45x5.32 in Annotation agreement and difficult categories
178
+ 76 none fig 12.45x5.39 in Depth matching changes precision and coverage
179
+ 77 none fig 12.45x4.87 in Detection and library size are separate diagnostics
180
+ 78 right fig 9.20x5.18 in Healthy cohort: LoRA cells cover the real ones
181
+ 79 right fig 9.20x4.79 in Healthy cohort: realism beyond precision/coverage
182
+ 80 right fig 9.20x5.14 in Healthy cohort: full vs LoRA vs condition encoder
183
+ 81 below fig 9.37x4.63 in Representative-dependent composition
184
+ 82 below fig 11.39x4.63 in Full vs LoRA vs cond.-encoder-only
185
+ 83 right fig 9.20x5.09 in Healthy cohort: LoRA rank and K
186
+ 84 right fig 9.20x5.09 in Healthy paired-data learning curves
187
+ 85 right fig 9.20x4.66 in Time: days for scSemiProfiler, minutes for LoRA
188
+ 86 below fig 10.77x4.63 in 5 donors: time to apply
189
+ 87 below fig 9.99x4.63 in Pairs needed: composition, coverage, training steps
190
+ 88 below fig 10.08x4.63 in LoRA rank: r = 4, 16, 64
191
+ 89 right fig 8.31x5.70 in K diversification: no gain
192
+ 90 below fig 12.45x3.82 in Five paired cohorts
193
+ 91 none fig 12.45x4.70 in Sepsis: exact-five reconstruction across five draws
194
+ 92 none fig 12.45x5.18 in Sepsis: realism beyond precision and coverage
195
+ 93 none fig 12.45x4.70 in Imperial: first completed exact-five comparison
196
+ 94 below fig 10.01x4.63 in 5 donors: LoRA vs scSemiProfiler — cells
197
+ 95 below fig 10.04x4.63 in 5 donors: realism beyond precision/coverage
198
+ 96 below fig 10.02x4.63 in 5 donors: precision/coverage at k = 3, 5, 10
199
+ 97 below fig 10.09x4.63 in 5-fold: realism beyond precision/coverage
200
+ 98 below fig 11.74x4.63 in Same training pairs: LoRA vs scSemiProfiler
201
+ 99 below fig 11.85x4.63 in scSemiProfiler and the representative-copy baseline
202
+ 100 none fig 10.46x5.70 in Sepsis: patient-aware disease-gene agreement
203
+ 101 none fig 10.46x5.70 in Imperial: patient-aware disease-gene agreement
204
+ 102 below fig 10.60x4.63 in Sepsis: fine-tuning variants
205
+ 103 right fig 8.44x5.70 in Pairs needed: donor and disease signal
206
+ 104 below fig 10.53x4.63 in Cell-type deconvolution, same pairs: composition
207
+ 105 none fig 12.45x4.94 in Deconvolution: expression coverage limits the comparison
208
+ 106 none fig 12.45x5.08 in K=4,000 recipe: paired reconstruction quality
209
+ 107 none fig 12.45x5.08 in K=4,000 recipe: disease signal does not improve uniformly
210
+ 108 none fig 12.45x5.22 in K=4,000 recipe: calibration gains are selective
211
+ 109 none fig 12.45x4.66 in Influenza: response order versus response genes
212
+ 110 none fig 10.30x5.70 in COVID: calibration on a shared real-cell map
213
+ 111 none fig 10.82x5.70 in COVID monocytes: direction after depth matching
214
+ 112 none fig 11.44x5.70 in COVID monocytes: direction, magnitude and null
215
+ 113 none fig 11.44x5.70 in COVID CD14 monocytes: direction, magnitude and null
216
+ 114 none fig 12.45x5.02 in COVID: biological endpoints give a mixed verdict
217
+ 115 none fig 11.83x5.70 in Rare-state frequencies in observed cells
218
+ 116 none fig 11.35x5.70 in Rare-state misses: rules 1–8
219
+ 117 none fig 11.72x5.70 in Rare-state misses: rules 9–15
220
+ 118 none fig 12.06x5.70 in Rare-state fidelity: zero-aware reanalysis
221
+ 119 none fig 10.76x5.70 in Sepsis rare states across paired-data budgets
222
+ 120 none fig 12.45x5.62 in Sepsis rare-state direction across support budgets
223
+ 121 none fig 11.35x5.70 in Rare-state screen in DRESS, Kawasaki and SLE
224
+ 122 right fig 7.24x5.70 in Consequence: disease direction flips
225
+ 123 none fig 12.45x5.18 in C1Q: single-gene detection versus co-detection
226
+ 124 none fig 12.45x4.55 in Behçet: K=4,000 changes direction more than identity
227
+ 125 none fig 12.45x5.59 in Behcet: one-gene and multi-gene C1Q rules
228
+ 126 below fig 9.46x4.63 in Pairs from other cohorts do not transfer
229
+ 127 below fig 9.44x4.63 in Longer training on other cohorts: gap stays
230
+ 128 below fig 10.61x4.63 in No pretraining: same cohort, from scratch
231
+ 129 below fig 10.53x4.63 in No pretraining: other cohorts, from scratch
232
+ 130 below fig 10.20x4.63 in Rare states: from scratch vs pretrained
233
+ 131 below fig 10.12x4.63 in Appendix: scSemiProfiler without output threshold
234
+ 132 none fig 12.45x5.28 in Bulk-only exploration: calibration populations differ
235
+ 134 right fig 9.20x5.19 in Rare-state fractions: original analysis
236
+ 135 right fig 9.20x5.01 in Rare-state ranking: original analysis
237
+ 136 below fig 9.23x4.98 in Rare states: original five-fold analysis
238
+ 137 right fig 8.01x5.70 in Bulk-only cohort plan: original snapshot
239
+ 138 none fig 12.45x4.73 in Historical bulk-only search: no confirmed new finding
240
+ 140 below fig 12.45x4.62 in Next: other tissues from a few dozen pairs
241
+ {"slides": 140, "groups": {"Introduction": [1, 2, 3, 4], "Figure 1": [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10], "Figure 2": [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23], "Figure 3": [24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33], "Figure 4": [34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39], "Figure 5": [40, 41], "Figure 6": [42, 43, 44], "Supplementary": [45, 46], "Supp S01": [47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52], "Supp S02": [53, 54, 55, 56, 57], "Supp S03": [58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72], "Supp S04": [73, 74, 75, 76, 77], "Supp S05": [78, 79, 80, 81, 82], "Supp S06": [83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89], "Supp S07": [90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99], "Supp S08": [100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108], "Supp S09": [109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114], "Supp S10": [115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120], "Supp S11": [121, 122, 123, 124, 125], "Supp S12": [126, 127, 128, 129, 130], "Supp S13": [131], "Supp S14": [132], "Historical archive": [133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138], "Discussion": [139, 140]}, "pptx": "/home/sj_server_1/PBISC/immun-pbmc-fm/model_8_sparse_data_diffusion/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/PBISC-Diffusion_expanded_master_20261013_enriched.pptx"}
242
+ convert /home/sj_server_1/PBISC/immun-pbmc-fm/model_8_sparse_data_diffusion/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/PBISC-Diffusion_expanded_master_20261013_enriched.pptx as a Impress document -> /home/sj_server_1/PBISC/immun-pbmc-fm/model_8_sparse_data_diffusion/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/PBISC-Diffusion_expanded_master_20261013_enriched.pdf using filter : impress_pdf_Export:{"UseTaggedPDF":{"type":"boolean","value":"false"},"PDFUACompliance":{"type":"boolean","value":"false"}}
243
+ Overwriting: /home/sj_server_1/PBISC/immun-pbmc-fm/model_8_sparse_data_diffusion/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/PBISC-Diffusion_expanded_master_20261013_enriched.pdf
244
+ {"pass": true, "counts": {"spec": 140, "pptx": 140, "pdf": 140}, "failures": [], "contacts": 12}
paper-releases/pbisc-diffusion/updates/20261013T072655Z-enriched-140-slide-master/diffusion/dataset/server_1/model8/presentations/2026-09-30--paper-summary--r00/data/figure_enrichment_20261013/render.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ """Rebuild from saved enrichment assets, export PDF and validate (CPU only).
2
+
3
+ Invoke within a bounded user-systemd unit with CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES empty.
4
+ This does not execute training, sampling or any scientific figure builder.
5
+ """
6
+ from pathlib import Path
7
+ import os
8
+ import subprocess
9
+ import sys
10
+
11
+ if os.environ.get('CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES')!='':
12
+ raise SystemExit('CPU-only export requires empty CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES')
13
+ A=Path(__file__).resolve().parent
14
+ D=A.parents[1]
15
+ commands=[
16
+ [sys.executable,str(D/'tools/build_enriched_master_20261013.py')],
17
+ ['libreoffice','-env:UserInstallation=file:///tmp/pbisc-enriched-lo-20261013',
18
+ '--headless','--convert-to',
19
+ 'pdf:impress_pdf_Export:{"UseTaggedPDF":{"type":"boolean","value":"false"},"PDFUACompliance":{"type":"boolean","value":"false"}}',
20
+ '--outdir',str(D),str(D/'PBISC-Diffusion_expanded_master_20261013_enriched.pptx')],
21
+ [sys.executable,str(D/'tools/verify_enriched_master_20261013.py')],
22
+ ]
23
+ with (A/'render.log').open('a') as log:
24
+ for command in commands:
25
+ print('Run:',Path(command[0]).name,Path(command[-1]).name,flush=True)
26
+ subprocess.run(command,cwd=D,stdout=log,stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,check=True,timeout=600)
27
+ print('PPTX, PDF and automated validation completed.',flush=True)