leiqf commited on
Commit
2ee89c8
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): d96eb77

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +59 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,62 @@
1
  ---
2
  license: mit
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3
  ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
  ---
2
  license: mit
3
+ task_categories:
4
+ - question-answering
5
+ - multiple-choice
6
+ language:
7
+ - en
8
+ tags:
9
+ - evaluation
10
+ - responsibleAI
11
+ - utility
12
+ size_categories:
13
+ - 10K<n<100K
14
  ---
15
+
16
+ # UtilityBench: Measuring Language Model Utility When Errors Have Different Costs
17
+
18
+ <p align="left">
19
+ <a href="https://github.com/LQF39466/UtilityBench"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/GitHub-Code-181717?logo=github" alt="GitHub"></a>
20
+ </p>
21
+
22
+ ## Introduction
23
+
24
+ As language models are increasingly deployed in real-world scenarios with important outcomes, their mistakes can have consequences that correctness alone does not capture. A minor error in a low-stakes question and a dangerous error in medical advice should not carry the same practical significance. We therefore propose a utility-based evaluation paradigm that explicitly incorporates the varying consequences of errors, encouraging more responsible model behavior. As an early trial of this paradigm, we construct UtilityBench with continuous, sample-specific consequence annotations and introduce UtilityAUC.
25
+
26
+ ## Usage
27
+
28
+ Import to your project using huggingface dataset, or refer to the [github repository](https://github.com/LQF39466/UtilityBench) for an end-to-end demo.
29
+
30
+ ## Dataset Fields
31
+
32
+ The dataset contains 15,000 records in a single `test` split.
33
+
34
+ | Field | Type | Description |
35
+ |---|---|---|
36
+ | `id` | int64 | Unique record identifier |
37
+ | `input` | string | Full prompt sent to the model |
38
+ | `answerability` | int8 | 1 = answerable; 0 = refusal required |
39
+ | `reference_answer` | string / null | Reference answer; null for refusal-required prompts |
40
+ | `source_id` | string | Source dataset and item identifier |
41
+ | `eta` | float64 | Relative error-consequence score; higher means greater consequences |
42
+ | `L` | float64 | Positive cost of an incorrect answer |
43
+ | `evaluator_id` | string | Evaluation rule or code-test identifier |
44
+
45
+ ## Acknowledgement
46
+
47
+ UtilityBench builds on 18 source datasets. We thank their authors for making these resources publicly available. Record-level provenance is preserved in `source_id`.
48
+
49
+ <!-- ## Citations
50
+
51
+ If you find this work useful, please consider citing:
52
+
53
+ ```bibtex
54
+ @misc{utilitybench,
55
+ title={UtilityBench},
56
+ url={https://github.com/LQF39466/UtilityBench},
57
+ }
58
+ ``` -->
59
+
60
+ ## Contact
61
+
62
+ If you encounter any problems using the dataset or evaluating your models, please [open an issue](https://github.com/LQF39466/UtilityBench/issues) in the github repository.