Scheduled Commit

Japanese/a0c8af578da34fdba431ea76e5d09788.jsonl

@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@
 {"comparison_id": "allenai/flan_v2_converted_tmp_ids_6092::smith_vs_teacher", "source_id": "allenai/flan_v2_converted_tmp_ids_6092", "language": "Japanese", "seed_prompt": "Given a sentence, generate a new sentence by performing small changes on the sentence. Here, make sure that the changes are semantically related and syntactically similar to the input. And the generated sentence should have high commonsense plausibility, that is to have reasonable probability of it being true.\n\nLet me give you an example: Stimulating the mind helps the brain to grow essential neural cells .\nThe answer to this example can be: Stimulating the learning helps the brain to grow new neural cells .\nHere is why: This is a good example of a change in the input. The created sentence is semantically similar to the input as both are talking about growing essential neural cells and the changes in the sentence follows the commonsense knowledge.\n\nOK. solve this:\nYou can use a sword to raise the wall .\nAnswer:", "pair": "smith_vs_teacher", "system_left": "teacher", "system_right": "smith", "overall": "tie_both_good", "aspects": {"naturalness": "tie_both_good", "cultural_appropriateness": "tie_both_good", "instruction_following": "tie_both_good", "coherence": "tie_both_good"}, "comment": "Both of them are related to the prompt but in a different way, and sound good to me. ", "instance_feedback": "", "winner_system": null, "annotator_id": "tiny_booth", "session_id": "a0c8af578da34fdba431ea76e5d09788", "annotated_at": "2026-09-22T20:04:03", "duration_ms": 771881}
 {"comparison_id": "allenai/flan_v2_converted_tmp_ids_64341::smith_vs_teacher", "source_id": "allenai/flan_v2_converted_tmp_ids_64341", "language": "Japanese", "seed_prompt": "[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.\nPremise: \"This image is of a crying toddler being held by an older gentleman with a camera as a younger male with long red-hair stands beside them.\"\nHypothesis: \"The family is sitting on a train.\"\nIs the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- no\n- it is not possible to tell\nThe first statement describes the younger male standing. The second statement describes the family as sitting.\nThe answer is no.\n\nQ: Given the sentence \"A quad sends dirt flying into the air.\" is it true that \"The four wheeler is stuck in the dirt.\"?\nA: I THE FOUR WHEELER MAY NOT BE STUCK IN THE DIRT JUST BECAUSE IT IS SENDING DIRT FLYING IN THE AIR.\nThe answer is it is not possible to tell.\n\nQUESTION: Premise: \"A small crowd cheers on runners during a race by clapping and cheering.\"\nHypothesis: \"A large crowd cheers on toddlers.\"\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\n\nLet's solve it slowly: Small and large represent two different sizes to quantify. Toddlers do not run to be called as runners.\nThe answer is no.\n\n[QUESTION] Premise: \"A beautiful ballerina with christmas lights wrapped around her body.\"\nHypothesis: \"A pretty dancer has christmas lights adorned around her figure.\"\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nA pretty dancer is another expression for beautiful ballerina and adorned can be exchanged for wrapped in this context.\nThe answer is yes.\n\nQ: Premise: \"The road is paved with grey bricks.\"\nHypothesis: \"A road leading to suburb.\"\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\nA: The road being paved with bricks does not mean it is leading to a suburb.\nThe answer is it is not possible to tell.\n\n[QUESTION] Premise: \"A team of canadian hockey players is sitting together.\"\nHypothesis: \"Sports players on the same team are sitting nearby.\"\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\n", "pair": "smith_vs_teacher", "system_left": "teacher", "system_right": "smith", "overall": "a", "aspects": {"naturalness": "tie_both_good", "cultural_appropriateness": "tie_both_good", "instruction_following": "tie_both_good", "coherence": "tie_both_good"}, "comment": "Both are good and related to the prompt, but A is more coversational taking turns with the prompt. ", "instance_feedback": "", "winner_system": "teacher", "annotator_id": "tiny_booth", "session_id": "a0c8af578da34fdba431ea76e5d09788", "annotated_at": "2026-09-22T20:11:35", "duration_ms": 452338}
 {"comparison_id": "allenai/flan_v2_converted_tmp_ids_68062::smith_vs_teacher", "source_id": "allenai/flan_v2_converted_tmp_ids_68062", "language": "Japanese", "seed_prompt": "Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.\nTurn the given fact into a question by a simple rearrangement of words. This typically involves replacing some part of the given fact with a WH word. For example, replacing the subject of the provided fact with the word \"what\" can form a valid question. Don't be creative! You just need to rearrange the words to turn the fact into a question - easy! Don't just randomly remove a word from the given fact to form a question. Remember that your question must evaluate scientific understanding. Pick a word or a phrase in the given fact to be the correct answer, then make the rest of the question. You can also form a question without any WH words. For example, \"A radio converts electricity into?\"\nExample: Fact: pesticides can harm animals.\nOutput: What can harm animals?\nIt's a good question because it is formed by simply replacing the word \"pesticides\" with \"what\".\n\nNew input case for you: Fact: Geckos go through larval stages while growing.\nOutput:", "pair": "smith_vs_teacher", "system_left": "teacher", "system_right": "smith", "overall": "tie_both_bad", "aspects": {"naturalness": "tie_both_bad", "cultural_appropriateness": "tie_both_bad", "instruction_following": "tie_both_good", "coherence": "tie_both_good"}, "comment": "Both of them have wrong words for geckos baby. ", "instance_feedback": "", "winner_system": null, "annotator_id": "tiny_booth", "session_id": "a0c8af578da34fdba431ea76e5d09788", "annotated_at": "2026-09-22T20:15:19", "duration_ms": 216455}
+{"comparison_id": "allenai/flan_v2_converted_tmp_ids_76411::smith_vs_teacher", "source_id": "allenai/flan_v2_converted_tmp_ids_76411", "language": "Japanese", "seed_prompt": "Reasoning & Answer: Mexican women in decorative white dresses implies they are wearing a dress.\nyes\nQuestion: Premise: \"Mexican women in decorative white dresses perform a dance as part of a parade.\"\nHypothesis: \"A mexican women is wearing a dress.\"\nDo we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?\n\nReasoning & Answer: To jump for a basketball does not imply to try out for the team.\nit is not possible to tell\nQuestion: Given the sentence \"Two men jump for the basketball.\" can we conclude that \"Two men try out for the basketball team.\"?\nOptions:\n- yes\n- it is not possible to tell\n- no\n\nReasoning & Answer: A deer leg is not the same object as a tree limb.\nno\nQuestion:", "pair": "smith_vs_teacher", "system_left": "smith", "system_right": "teacher", "overall": "tie_both_good", "aspects": {"naturalness": "tie_both_good", "cultural_appropriateness": "tie_both_good", "instruction_following": "tie_both_good", "coherence": "tie_both_good"}, "comment": "", "instance_feedback": "", "winner_system": null, "annotator_id": "tiny_booth", "session_id": "a0c8af578da34fdba431ea76e5d09788", "annotated_at": "2026-09-22T20:19:44", "duration_ms": 264167}