Mohit Gupta commited on
Commit
6d97ea3
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 7b89e7d

Documents how I constructed the three datasets, their differences, inclusion criteria, and intended research applications.

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. 02-Data/03-Analysis_Ready/README.md +424 -0
02-Data/03-Analysis_Ready/README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,424 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Analysis-Ready Datasets — AffLex-Provo
2
+
3
+ ## 1. Overview
4
+
5
+ This directory contains three research datasets constructed
6
+ through the AffLex-Provo computational data preparation and
7
+ triangulation pipeline.
8
+
9
+ The datasets were prepared by Mohit Gupta as part of the
10
+ AffLex-Provo research program at the University of Illinois
11
+ Urbana-Champaign.
12
+
13
+ The construction process integrates three established
14
+ psycholinguistic research resources:
15
+
16
+ 1. Provo Corpus — Eye-tracking and predictability information.
17
+ 2. SUBTLEX-US — Lexical frequency information.
18
+ 3. Warriner et al. (2013) — Valence, arousal, and dominance norms.
19
+
20
+ The resulting datasets support investigations of lexical
21
+ and affective influences on eye-movement behavior during
22
+ natural reading.
23
+
24
+ The three datasets represent different levels of predictor
25
+ availability and analytical eligibility.
26
+
27
+ ---
28
+
29
+ ## 2. Dataset Inventory
30
+
31
+ | Dataset | Description | Intended Research Application |
32
+ |---|---|---|
33
+ | `01-Master_Provo.csv` | Complete triangulated Provo dataset, retaining observations regardless of lexical or affective norm availability. | General corpus research and coverage analyses |
34
+ | `02_Lexical_Provo.csv` | Subset with complete mandatory lexical predictors. | Lexical Provo research program |
35
+ | `03_Affective_Provo.csv` | Subset with complete mandatory lexical and affective predictors. | Affective Provo research program |
36
+
37
+ All three datasets were generated through the
38
+ AffLex-Provo computational preparation workflow.
39
+
40
+ The datasets share a common source corpus but differ
41
+ in their predictor-completeness requirements.
42
+
43
+ ---
44
+
45
+ ## 3. Source Research Datasets
46
+
47
+ ### 3.1 Provo Corpus
48
+
49
+ The Provo Corpus provides eye-tracking observations
50
+ and word predictability information collected during
51
+ natural reading.
52
+
53
+ Original publication:
54
+
55
+ Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2018).
56
+
57
+ The Provo Corpus: A large eye-tracking corpus with
58
+ predictability norms.
59
+
60
+ *Behavior Research Methods, 50*, 826–833.
61
+
62
+ https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0908-4
63
+
64
+ ### 3.2 SUBTLEX-US
65
+
66
+ SUBTLEX-US provides lexical frequency information
67
+ derived from American English subtitles.
68
+
69
+ Original publication:
70
+
71
+ Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009).
72
+
73
+ Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation
74
+ of current word frequency norms and the introduction
75
+ of a new and improved word frequency measure for
76
+ American English.
77
+
78
+ *Behavior Research Methods, 41*, 977–990.
79
+
80
+ https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
81
+
82
+ ### 3.3 Warriner Affective Norms
83
+
84
+ Warriner et al. (2013) provide affective ratings
85
+ for English lemmas across three dimensions:
86
+
87
+ - Valence
88
+ - Arousal
89
+ - Dominance
90
+
91
+ Original publication:
92
+
93
+ Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013).
94
+
95
+ Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for
96
+ 13,915 English lemmas.
97
+
98
+ *Behavior Research Methods, 45*, 1191–1207.
99
+
100
+ https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x
101
+
102
+ ---
103
+
104
+ ## 4. Computational Dataset Construction
105
+
106
+ The datasets were constructed using the AffLex-Provo
107
+ Python preprocessing and triangulation pipeline.
108
+
109
+ The workflow includes:
110
+
111
+ 1. Loading the original research datasets.
112
+ 2. Standardizing lexical identifiers.
113
+ 3. Evaluating vocabulary overlap.
114
+ 4. Identifying missing lexical entries.
115
+ 5. Applying lexical normalization and lemmatization.
116
+ 6. Resolving duplicate lexical entries before merging.
117
+ 7. Integrating SUBTLEX-US frequency information.
118
+ 8. Integrating Warriner affective norms.
119
+ 9. Generating lexical coverage indicators.
120
+ 10. Validating dataset integrity.
121
+ 11. Evaluating predictor completeness.
122
+ 12. Exporting the three research datasets.
123
+
124
+ The corresponding computational notebook is:
125
+
126
+ `02-Build_Master+Lexical+Affective_Provo(2).ipynb`
127
+
128
+ The notebook documents the computational procedures
129
+ used to generate these datasets.
130
+
131
+ ---
132
+
133
+ ## 5. Dataset 1 — Master Provo
134
+
135
+ **Filename:** `01-Master_Provo.csv`
136
+
137
+ ### Purpose
138
+
139
+ The Master Provo dataset provides the complete
140
+ triangulated research resource.
141
+
142
+ It combines Provo eye-tracking observations with
143
+ available lexical frequency and affective norming
144
+ information.
145
+
146
+ ### Construction
147
+
148
+ The master dataset is generated using validated
149
+ many-to-one lexical merges.
150
+
151
+ The primary standardized lexical identifier is:
152
+
153
+ `Word_Norm_lower_lemma`
154
+
155
+ The merge procedure retains the original Provo
156
+ token-level observations.
157
+
158
+ ### Coverage Indicators
159
+
160
+ The dataset includes indicators documenting
161
+ lexical norm availability:
162
+
163
+ | Variable | Meaning |
164
+ |---|---|
165
+ | `Has_SUBTLEX` | Availability of SUBTLEX-US frequency information |
166
+ | `Has_VAD` | Availability of Warriner affective norms |
167
+ | `Has_FULL_NORMS` | Availability of both SUBTLEX-US and VAD information |
168
+
169
+ ### Filtering
170
+
171
+ No analysis-specific filtering is applied.
172
+
173
+ Observations are retained even when lexical
174
+ or affective information is unavailable.
175
+
176
+ This dataset is appropriate for:
177
+
178
+ - Corpus-level descriptive analyses.
179
+ - Vocabulary coverage investigations.
180
+ - Missingness analyses.
181
+ - Alternative preprocessing strategies.
182
+ - Construction of additional analytical subsets.
183
+
184
+ ---
185
+
186
+ ## 6. Dataset 2 — Lexical Provo
187
+
188
+ **Filename:** `02_Lexical_Provo.csv`
189
+
190
+ ### Purpose
191
+
192
+ The Lexical Provo dataset supports investigations
193
+ of conventional lexical predictors of eye movements.
194
+
195
+ ### Mandatory Predictors
196
+
197
+ | Variable | Description |
198
+ |---|---|
199
+ | `Word_Length` | Word length |
200
+ | `Response_Proportion` | Contextual word predictability |
201
+ | `Lg10WF` | Log-transformed lexical frequency |
202
+
203
+ ### Inclusion Criteria
204
+
205
+ Observations must satisfy:
206
+
207
+ 1. `Has_SUBTLEX == True`
208
+ 2. Nonmissing `Word_Length`
209
+ 3. Nonmissing `Response_Proportion`
210
+ 4. Nonmissing `Lg10WF`
211
+
212
+ ### Important Filtering Policy
213
+
214
+ Eye-tracking outcomes are not used to determine
215
+ inclusion in the exported Lexical Provo dataset.
216
+
217
+ The dataset retains:
218
+
219
+ - Skipped observations.
220
+ - Zero-dwell-time observations.
221
+ - Observations with missing eye-tracking outcomes.
222
+
223
+ Outcome-specific filtering must be performed
224
+ during subsequent statistical analysis.
225
+
226
+ ---
227
+
228
+ ## 7. Dataset 3 — Affective Provo
229
+
230
+ **Filename:** `03_Affective_Provo.csv`
231
+
232
+ ### Purpose
233
+
234
+ The Affective Provo dataset supports investigations
235
+ of lexical and affective influences on eye movements.
236
+
237
+ ### Mandatory Lexical Predictors
238
+
239
+ | Variable | Description |
240
+ |---|---|
241
+ | `Word_Length` | Word length |
242
+ | `Response_Proportion` | Contextual word predictability |
243
+ | `Lg10WF` | Log-transformed lexical frequency |
244
+
245
+ ### Mandatory Affective Predictors
246
+
247
+ | Variable | Description |
248
+ |---|---|
249
+ | `V.Mean.Y` | Mean valence rating |
250
+ | `A.Mean.Y` | Mean arousal rating |
251
+ | `D.Mean.Y` | Mean dominance rating |
252
+
253
+ ### Inclusion Criteria
254
+
255
+ Observations must satisfy:
256
+
257
+ 1. `Has_FULL_NORMS == True`
258
+ 2. Complete mandatory lexical predictors.
259
+ 3. Complete mandatory affective predictors.
260
+
261
+ ### Important Filtering Policy
262
+
263
+ The exported dataset retains eye-tracking observations
264
+ regardless of their outcome-specific eligibility.
265
+
266
+ This includes:
267
+
268
+ - Skipped observations.
269
+ - Zero-dwell-time observations.
270
+ - Missing eye-tracking measurements.
271
+
272
+ The appropriate filtering procedures are applied
273
+ separately for each statistical outcome.
274
+
275
+ ---
276
+
277
+ ## 8. Eye-Tracking Analysis Considerations
278
+
279
+ The exported datasets are predictor-complete
280
+ research resources.
281
+
282
+ They are not automatically the final datasets
283
+ used in every statistical model.
284
+
285
+ ### Fixation Duration Analyses
286
+
287
+ Duration analyses may require:
288
+
289
+ - Valid outcome measurements.
290
+ - Positive fixation or dwell-time values.
291
+ - Complete model predictors.
292
+ - Appropriate grouping identifiers.
293
+
294
+ ### Skipping Analyses
295
+
296
+ Skipping analyses must preserve both skipped
297
+ and non-skipped observations.
298
+
299
+ Filtering the dataset to positive dwell times
300
+ before modeling skipping behavior would remove
301
+ important observations.
302
+
303
+ ### Regression Analyses
304
+
305
+ Regression-related analyses require eligibility
306
+ criteria appropriate to the specific regression
307
+ outcome and statistical model.
308
+
309
+ ### Reporting Requirements
310
+
311
+ Researchers should report the actual number of
312
+ observations included in each statistical model.
313
+
314
+ The total number of rows in an exported dataset
315
+ should not automatically be reported as the
316
+ sample size for every analysis.
317
+
318
+ ---
319
+
320
+ ## 9. Dataset Integrity and Validation
321
+
322
+ The construction pipeline includes procedures
323
+ designed to preserve structural integrity.
324
+
325
+ These include:
326
+
327
+ - Standardized lexical matching.
328
+ - Duplicate resolution.
329
+ - Validated many-to-one merges.
330
+ - Row-count verification.
331
+ - Lexical coverage diagnostics.
332
+ - Predictor completeness checks.
333
+ - Missingness evaluation.
334
+ - Final column standardization.
335
+
336
+ The master dataset retains the original
337
+ token-level structure during lexical integration.
338
+
339
+ The Lexical Provo and Affective Provo datasets
340
+ apply additional predictor-completeness criteria.
341
+
342
+ ---
343
+
344
+ ## 10. Reproducibility
345
+
346
+ The three datasets were generated using the
347
+ AffLex-Provo data preparation pipeline.
348
+
349
+ Researchers seeking to reproduce their construction
350
+ should consult the corresponding preprocessing
351
+ notebooks and source documentation.
352
+
353
+ Reproduction requires access to the applicable
354
+ original research datasets and compatible
355
+ computational dependencies.
356
+
357
+ The preparation workflow was executed using
358
+ personally owned computing resources.
359
+
360
+ Subsequent statistical analyses used a combination
361
+ of personal computing resources and Illinois Computes.
362
+
363
+ Those statistical computing environments are
364
+ documented separately.
365
+
366
+ ---
367
+
368
+ ## 11. Licensing and Attribution
369
+
370
+ The datasets contain information originating from
371
+ previously published research resources.
372
+
373
+ The AffLex-Provo project contributes computational
374
+ preprocessing, integration, validation, and
375
+ dataset construction procedures.
376
+
377
+ Original contributions may be licensed separately
378
+ where the contributors possess the necessary rights.
379
+
380
+ Underlying third-party data remain subject to
381
+ their applicable original licenses and
382
+ redistribution permissions.
383
+
384
+ See:
385
+
386
+ [Analysis-Ready Dataset Licensing](AnalysisReadyDataLicense.md)
387
+
388
+ [Original Dataset Citations](../01-Raw/MandatoryCitations.md)
389
+
390
+ ---
391
+
392
+ ## 12. Scholarly Citation
393
+
394
+ Researchers using original AffLex-Provo contributions
395
+ are encouraged to cite the corresponding publication.
396
+
397
+ Gupta, M., & Christianson, K. (in press).
398
+
399
+ Beyond word length, frequency, and predictability:
400
+ Affective properties predict eye movement in reading.
401
+
402
+ *Reading Research Quarterly.*
403
+
404
+ DOI: Pending assignment.
405
+
406
+ Researchers should additionally cite the original
407
+ data sources relevant to their analyses.
408
+
409
+ ---
410
+
411
+ ## 13. Repository Information
412
+
413
+ **Repository:** AffLex-Provo
414
+
415
+ **Dataset Preparation:** Mohit Gupta
416
+
417
+ **Institution:** University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
418
+
419
+ **Repository URL:**
420
+ https://huggingface.co/datasets/mohitg2/AffLex-Provo
421
+
422
+ **Documentation Version:** 1.0
423
+
424
+ **Last Updated:** October 2026