Download scripts/optimize_container_style_design.py from monish133/subsea-compute-open-artifacts: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 9.48 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/monish133/subsea-compute-open-artifacts/resolve/main/scripts/optimize_container_style_design.py
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/monish133/subsea-compute-open-artifacts/scripts/optimize_container_style_design.py
-
curl -L -o optimize_container_style_design.py https://huggingface.co/datasets/monish133/subsea-compute-open-artifacts/resolve/main/scripts/optimize_container_style_design.py
9.48 kB
| """Optimize viable 40-foot container-style subsea concepts with screening physics. | |
| This script focuses on the most credible container-style concept: | |
| an ISO handling envelope with an internal rounded pressure hull. | |
| It searches for geometries that satisfy a target minimum safety factor at depth, | |
| then ranks them by rough payload efficiency. | |
| """ | |
| from __future__ import annotations | |
| import argparse | |
| import json | |
| import math | |
| from dataclasses import asdict | |
| from pathlib import Path | |
| import pandas as pd | |
| from simulate_subsea_container import ( | |
| G, | |
| RHO_SEAWATER, | |
| InternalHullDesign, | |
| default_hull_design, | |
| default_material, | |
| evaluate_internal_hull, | |
| gross_cylinder_volume, | |
| hydrostatic_pressure, | |
| ) | |
| def shell_mass_kg(design: InternalHullDesign, density_kg_m3: float) -> float: | |
| radius = design.hull_outer_diameter_m / 2.0 | |
| cyl_area = 2.0 * math.pi * radius * design.hull_cyl_length_m | |
| head_area = 4.0 * math.pi * radius**2 | |
| hatch_area = math.pi * (design.hatch_diameter_m / 2.0) ** 2 | |
| return density_kg_m3 * ( | |
| cyl_area * design.shell_thickness_m | |
| + head_area * design.endcap_thickness_m | |
| + hatch_area * design.hatch_thickness_m | |
| ) | |
| def displaced_mass_kg(design: InternalHullDesign) -> float: | |
| return gross_cylinder_volume(design) * RHO_SEAWATER | |
| def broadside_current_drag_n(design: InternalHullDesign, current_speed_m_s: float, cd: float = 0.9) -> float: | |
| projected_area = design.envelope_length_m * design.envelope_height_m | |
| return 0.5 * RHO_SEAWATER * cd * projected_area * current_speed_m_s**2 | |
| def evaluate_design( | |
| design: InternalHullDesign, | |
| target_depth_m: float, | |
| min_sf: float, | |
| current_speed_m_s: float, | |
| ) -> dict | None: | |
| material = default_material() | |
| checks = evaluate_internal_hull(target_depth_m, material, design) | |
| governing = min(checks, key=lambda c: c.governing_safety_factor) | |
| if governing.governing_safety_factor < min_sf: | |
| return None | |
| shell_mass = shell_mass_kg(design, material.density_kg_m3) | |
| displaced_mass = displaced_mass_kg(design) | |
| gross_volume = gross_cylinder_volume(design) | |
| drag = broadside_current_drag_n(design, current_speed_m_s) | |
| # Simple score: maximize usable volume per tonne of shell mass, | |
| # while slightly penalizing thicker shells. | |
| score = gross_volume / max(shell_mass / 1000.0, 1e-6) | |
| return { | |
| "score": score, | |
| "depth_m": target_depth_m, | |
| "min_sf_required": min_sf, | |
| "governing_component": governing.component, | |
| "governing_sf": governing.governing_safety_factor, | |
| "governing_stress_mpa": governing.stress_pa / 1e6, | |
| "hull_outer_diameter_m": design.hull_outer_diameter_m, | |
| "hull_cyl_length_m": design.hull_cyl_length_m, | |
| "shell_thickness_mm": design.shell_thickness_m * 1000.0, | |
| "endcap_thickness_mm": design.endcap_thickness_m * 1000.0, | |
| "hatch_diameter_m": design.hatch_diameter_m, | |
| "hatch_thickness_mm": design.hatch_thickness_m * 1000.0, | |
| "shell_buckling_knockdown": design.shell_buckling_knockdown, | |
| "head_buckling_knockdown": design.head_buckling_knockdown, | |
| "gross_internal_hull_volume_m3": gross_volume, | |
| "shell_mass_tonnes": shell_mass / 1000.0, | |
| "displaced_mass_tonnes": displaced_mass / 1000.0, | |
| "net_buoyancy_shell_only_tonnes": (displaced_mass - shell_mass) / 1000.0, | |
| "broadside_drag_at_current_kn": drag / 1000.0, | |
| } | |
| def optimize(target_depth_m: float, min_sf: float, current_speed_m_s: float) -> pd.DataFrame: | |
| base = default_hull_design() | |
| rows = [] | |
| for diameter in [2.00, 2.05, 2.10, 2.15, 2.20, 2.25]: | |
| # Leave some room in the ISO frame for saddles and service clearance. | |
| if diameter > 2.25: | |
| continue | |
| for cyl_length in [8.8, 9.1, 9.4, 9.7, 10.0]: | |
| if cyl_length + diameter > 12.0: | |
| continue | |
| for shell_mm in [28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40]: | |
| for head_mm in [32, 35, 38, 40, 42]: | |
| for hatch_d in [0.60, 0.70, 0.80]: | |
| for hatch_mm in [50, 60, 70]: | |
| design = InternalHullDesign( | |
| **{ | |
| **asdict(base), | |
| "hull_outer_diameter_m": diameter, | |
| "hull_cyl_length_m": cyl_length, | |
| "shell_thickness_m": shell_mm / 1000.0, | |
| "endcap_thickness_m": head_mm / 1000.0, | |
| "endcap_radius_m": diameter / 2.0, | |
| "hatch_diameter_m": hatch_d, | |
| "hatch_thickness_m": hatch_mm / 1000.0, | |
| } | |
| ) | |
| result = evaluate_design(design, target_depth_m, min_sf, current_speed_m_s) | |
| if result: | |
| rows.append(result) | |
| df = pd.DataFrame(rows) | |
| if df.empty: | |
| return df | |
| return df.sort_values(["score", "gross_internal_hull_volume_m3", "governing_sf"], ascending=[False, False, False]) | |
| def build_markdown(best: pd.Series, target_depth_m: float, min_sf: float, current_speed_m_s: float) -> str: | |
| pressure_bar = hydrostatic_pressure(target_depth_m) / 1e5 | |
| return f"""# Final Recommended Container-Style Subsea Design | |
| ## Recommendation | |
| The most viable container-style design from the current screening sweep is: | |
| - a `40-foot ISO handling envelope` | |
| - with a `single internal rounded pressure hull` | |
| - `surface-service only` | |
| - `small pressure hatch only` | |
| - no large cargo-door-style openings in the pressure boundary | |
| This is the best compromise between: | |
| - subsea structural efficiency | |
| - manufacturability | |
| - transportability | |
| - future serviceability at the surface | |
| ## Target design point | |
| - Design depth: `{target_depth_m:.0f} m` | |
| - Hydrostatic pressure: `{pressure_bar:.2f} bar(g)` | |
| - Required minimum screening safety factor: `{min_sf:.2f}` | |
| - Reference broadside current for drag check: `{current_speed_m_s:.2f} m/s` | |
| ## Final geometry | |
| - Pressure hull OD: `{best['hull_outer_diameter_m']:.2f} m` | |
| - Cylindrical body length: `{best['hull_cyl_length_m']:.2f} m` | |
| - Shell thickness: `{best['shell_thickness_mm']:.0f} mm` | |
| - Endcap thickness: `{best['endcap_thickness_mm']:.0f} mm` | |
| - Hatch diameter: `{best['hatch_diameter_m']:.2f} m` | |
| - Hatch thickness: `{best['hatch_thickness_mm']:.0f} mm` | |
| ## Performance in the screening model | |
| - Governing component: `{best['governing_component']}` | |
| - Governing safety factor: `{best['governing_sf']:.2f}` | |
| - Governing stress: `{best['governing_stress_mpa']:.1f} MPa` | |
| - Gross internal hull volume: `{best['gross_internal_hull_volume_m3']:.1f} m^3` | |
| - Shell-only mass: `{best['shell_mass_tonnes']:.1f} tonnes` | |
| - Displaced seawater mass: `{best['displaced_mass_tonnes']:.1f} tonnes` | |
| - Net buoyancy with shell only: `{best['net_buoyancy_shell_only_tonnes']:.1f} tonnes` | |
| - Broadside current drag at `{current_speed_m_s:.2f} m/s`: `{best['broadside_drag_at_current_kn']:.1f} kN` | |
| ## Why this wins | |
| This design avoids the main failure mechanisms of flat 40-foot pressure boxes: | |
| - no large flat cargo doors under external pressure | |
| - no large unsupported flat wall panels | |
| - rounded shell carries hydrostatic load more efficiently | |
| - small hatch keeps local pressure-boundary problems manageable | |
| It still preserves the 40-foot logistics advantage: | |
| - ISO-friendly transport envelope | |
| - crane and yard handling compatibility | |
| - modular factory build strategy | |
| ## What this is not | |
| This is not a certified subsea vessel design. | |
| It is a strong first-principles screening result aligned with the logic of real subsea design rules: | |
| - hydrostatic pressure loading | |
| - external-pressure shell buckling | |
| - pressure-hatch penalty | |
| - broadside current load screening | |
| For class or fabrication release, the next step would be: | |
| 1. shell and plate FEA | |
| 2. hatch-ring and penetrator local stress analysis | |
| 3. corrosion allowance and fatigue assessment | |
| 4. support saddle and lifting analysis | |
| 5. thermal / cooling and electrical integration | |
| """ | |
| def parse_args() -> argparse.Namespace: | |
| parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Optimize container-style subsea design.") | |
| parser.add_argument("--target-depth-m", type=float, default=100.0) | |
| parser.add_argument("--min-sf", type=float, default=1.5) | |
| parser.add_argument("--current-speed-m-s", type=float, default=1.5) | |
| parser.add_argument( | |
| "--output-dir", | |
| type=Path, | |
| default=Path("underwater_datacenter_project") / "optimized_container_design", | |
| ) | |
| return parser.parse_args() | |
| def main() -> None: | |
| args = parse_args() | |
| out = args.output_dir | |
| out.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) | |
| df = optimize(args.target_depth_m, args.min_sf, args.current_speed_m_s) | |
| if df.empty: | |
| raise SystemExit("No feasible design found in the search space.") | |
| best = df.iloc[0] | |
| df.to_csv(out / "candidate_designs.csv", index=False) | |
| (out / "best_design.json").write_text(best.to_json(indent=2), encoding="utf-8") | |
| (out / "final_design.md").write_text( | |
| build_markdown(best, args.target_depth_m, args.min_sf, args.current_speed_m_s), | |
| encoding="utf-8", | |
| ) | |
| print(f"Wrote optimized design to {out.resolve()}") | |
| print(f"Best final design: {(out / 'final_design.md').resolve()}") | |
| if __name__ == "__main__": | |
| main() | |