domizzz2025's picture
Upload statLens evaluation inputs (57 tasks)
83a2c59 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
1.44 kB
We compared A375 human melanoma cells carrying a CRISPR/Cas9 knock-down of SIRT6 with wild-type A375 cells. The genotype is recorded in the `group` column, which holds our groups (`genotype` repeats it): SIRT6KD is a SIRT6 knock-down clone, picked by limiting dilution from a CRISPR/Cas9-edited pool, and WT is the wild-type parental A375 line (S6KO and WT in the sample names). There are three cultures of each, six samples in all, collected at a single time point during exponential growth, without any drug treatment.
Each sample is one independent cell culture, made into its own library and sequenced once, so there are no technical replicates. No knock-down culture is matched to a particular wild-type culture: the numbers in the sample names (S6KO_1 to S6KO_3, WT_2 to WT_4) only count the cultures within each group. All six samples carry the same GEO batch date (`src_batch` is 11/1/2023 for every sample), so we have no batch differences, and we know of no other variable that matters; the remaining columns are GEO annotations.
The data are bulk RNA-seq from total RNA (NEBNext Ultra II libraries), given as gene-level RSEM expected counts from the nf-core/rnaseq pipeline (STAR + RSEM), rounded to whole numbers; the features are NCBI gene symbols.
Our question is which genes are differentially expressed in SIRT6 knock-down A375 cells (SIRT6KD) compared with wild-type cells (WT). All six samples are part of this question.