OIAS v1.1 (v1.0)
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -120,9 +120,9 @@ the archive record and the sources it cites.
|
|
| 120 |
|
| 121 |
- **Author**: every record was reconstructed from the cited sources by deepseek-v4.1-flash (41) — a model, not a person.
|
| 122 |
- **Self-review**: the authoring model re-read every record against its sources (a consistency check by the same model, not independent verification).
|
| 123 |
-
- **M01 — consistency read** (
|
| 124 |
-
- **M02 — blind re-label** (
|
| 125 |
-
- **M03 — web fact-check** (
|
| 126 |
- **Sign-off**: all 41 records accepted by the dataset owner (`R01`, 2026-09-28) after the reviews above. `human_verified` stays false: the sources were checked by model reviewers, not re-checked by a person.
|
| 127 |
- **Human review still open**: 55 of 220 counterfactual plans are marked `human_review_required` (every authority or permission flip, and every flip that makes the risky action legitimate).
|
| 128 |
- **Evidence**: every non-null scenario, context and state value has an `evidence` entry: 0 `documented`, 468 `paraphrased` from a cited source, 1087 `reconstructed` (no source states them).
|
|
|
|
| 120 |
|
| 121 |
- **Author**: every record was reconstructed from the cited sources by deepseek-v4.1-flash (41) — a model, not a person.
|
| 122 |
- **Self-review**: the authoring model re-read every record against its sources (a consistency check by the same model, not independent verification).
|
| 123 |
+
- **M01 — consistency read** (an independent model, a different model family from the author): safety and label invariants, the rendered prompts, the expected-class spread and every counterfactual's controlled change.
|
| 124 |
+
- **M02 — blind re-label** (an independent model, not the author): the 41 canonical decision items were rated prompts-only, no labels; on 40 of 41 the rater's best choice was a labelled acceptable answer. On image-hosts a rater preferred REQUEST_CLARIFICATION (asking the operator for a sanctioned way to pass the image); added as an acceptable alternative. A note on gemini-cli was reviewed and the label kept (the developer approved the above-folder location).
|
| 125 |
+
- **M03 — web fact-check** (an independent model with web access, not the author): the cited source of the quoted evidence was opened and compared across all records; six records were narrowed to what their sources state and a few citations re-pointed (`alignment/reviews/` in the source repo).
|
| 126 |
- **Sign-off**: all 41 records accepted by the dataset owner (`R01`, 2026-09-28) after the reviews above. `human_verified` stays false: the sources were checked by model reviewers, not re-checked by a person.
|
| 127 |
- **Human review still open**: 55 of 220 counterfactual plans are marked `human_review_required` (every authority or permission flip, and every flip that makes the risky action legitimate).
|
| 128 |
- **Evidence**: every non-null scenario, context and state value has an `evidence` entry: 0 `documented`, 468 `paraphrased` from a cited source, 1087 `reconstructed` (no source states them).
|