origindatalab commited on
Commit
b77b4ef
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): f96c89b

Align Field Note 05 dataset card with ODL technical field note style

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +96 -34
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,69 +1,131 @@
1
  ---
2
  license: other
3
  license_name: rights-reserved-evaluation-sample
4
- pretty_name: Origin Data Lab Keystep Annotation Evaluation Samples
 
 
5
  tags:
6
- - egocentric
7
  - robotics
 
 
8
  - imu
 
9
  - annotation
10
  - evaluation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11
  ---
12
 
13
- # Keystep Annotation — Evaluation Samples
 
 
14
 
15
- [![Field Note](https://img.shields.io/badge/Origin_Data_Lab-Field_Note_05-155e75)](https://origindatalab.io/technical-field-notes/keystep-annotation-egocentric-robot-learning.html) ![Physical AI](https://img.shields.io/badge/Physical_AI-Egocentric-334155) ![QA](https://img.shields.io/badge/Structural_QA-0_errors-16a34a) ![Scope](https://img.shields.io/badge/Scope-2_clips_%7C_25_keysteps-475569)
 
 
16
 
17
- **Origin Data Lab · Technical Field Note #05**
18
 
19
- **[Technical field note](https://origindatalab.io/technical-field-notes/keystep-annotation-egocentric-robot-learning.html) · [GitHub](https://github.com/origin-data-lab/egocentric-keystep-annotation) · [Hugging Face](https://huggingface.co/datasets/origin-data-lab/egocentric-keystep-annotation)**
20
 
21
- > **Limited evaluation release:** one documented annotation example and four boundary-test rows. **Not** the complete 25-keystep dataset.
22
 
23
- ## Dataset overview
 
 
24
 
25
  | Metric | Sample A — knife preparation | Sample B — seasonings and stirring |
26
  |---|---:|---:|
27
- | Duration | 66.0 s | 65.967 s |
28
- | Frames | 1,979 | 1,978 |
29
- | Keysteps / phases | 13 / 3 | 12 / 3 |
30
  | Gaps / overlaps | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
31
  | Missing required fields | 0 | 0 |
32
  | Out-of-vocabulary verbs | 0 | 0 |
 
33
 
34
- ### What is included
35
-
36
- | File | Rows / scope | Description |
37
- |---|---|---|
38
- | `annotation_example.jsonl` | 1 example | `ks_A_01`, a documented annotation span |
39
- | `boundary_motion_results.csv` | 4 rows | Observed vs random-boundary motion scores |
40
- | `figures/` | 5 figures | Visualization of samples and evaluation |
41
 
42
- ## Data fields
43
 
44
- **Annotation example:** `id`, `t_start`, `t_end`, `phase`, `verb`, `object`, `tool`, `active_hand`, `support_hand`, `instruction`, `state_before`, `state_after`, `outcome`.
45
 
46
- **Boundary CSV:** `sample`, `boundary_set`, `n`, `labelled_deg_per_s`, `random_mean_deg_per_s`, `random_p95_deg_per_s`, `p_value`. Angular rates are in degrees per second; `p_value` is the fraction of 2,000 random sets scoring at least as high as the observed set.
47
 
48
- ## Evaluation results
49
 
50
- | Boundary set | n | Labelled Δ median (°/s) | Random mean | Random p95 | p |
51
  |---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|
52
- | A · all | 12 | 21.9 | 7.2 | 14.7 | 0.005 |
53
- | B · all | 11 | 29.9 | 10.0 | 20.1 | 0.002 |
54
- | A · task-to-task | 8 | 3.3 | 4.1 | 6.8 | 0.67 |
55
- | B · task-to-task | 7 | 10.2 | 3.9 | 7.5 | 0.003 |
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
56
 
57
- ![Keystep labels aligned with wearer motion](figures/keystep-timeline-gyro.webp)
58
 
59
- ![Boundary-motion comparison](figures/boundary-motion-test.webp)
60
 
61
- ## Intended use and limitations
62
 
63
- Suitable for inspecting a documented annotation format and reviewing a small, published evaluation table. **Not suitable** as a complete video dataset or a statistically representative benchmark.
64
 
65
- The study covers **two clips from one operator**, not a representative population. Structural QA checks formatting and consistency; it does **not** prove boundary accuracy. A body-worn IMU can reveal coarse wearer motion, but cannot reliably validate fine hand actions such as knife manipulation. **No raw videos, raw IMU streams, or complete 25-keystep annotation files are included in this public release.**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
66
 
67
- ## Provenance, rights and citation
68
 
69
- Source: [Origin Data Lab Field Note #05](https://origindatalab.io/technical-field-notes/keystep-annotation-egocentric-robot-learning.html). All rights reserved unless Origin Data Lab grants separate permission. Contact [contact@origindatalab.io](mailto:contact@origindatalab.io) for permitted reuse or a larger evaluation package.
 
1
  ---
2
  license: other
3
  license_name: rights-reserved-evaluation-sample
4
+ language:
5
+ - en
6
+ pretty_name: "Keystep Annotation and IMU Boundary Evaluation (Field Note #05)"
7
  tags:
 
8
  - robotics
9
+ - physical-ai
10
+ - egocentric
11
  - imu
12
+ - action-segmentation
13
  - annotation
14
  - evaluation
15
+ size_categories:
16
+ - n<1K
17
+ configs:
18
+ - config_name: default
19
+ data_files:
20
+ - split: train
21
+ path: boundary_motion_results.csv
22
  ---
23
 
24
+ # Keystep Annotation and IMU Boundary Evaluation
25
+
26
+ **Origin Data Lab · Technical Field Note #05 · 24 October 2026**
27
 
28
+ [![Field Note](https://img.shields.io/badge/Field_Note-%2305-0B1220?style=for-the-badge)](https://origindatalab.io/technical-field-notes/keystep-annotation-egocentric-robot-learning.html)
29
+ ![Evaluation](https://img.shields.io/badge/Boundary-Evaluation-3776AB?style=for-the-badge)
30
+ ![Scope](https://img.shields.io/badge/2_Clips-25_Keysteps-16A34A?style=for-the-badge)
31
 
32
+ > **Short answer.** Structural checks found **zero reported gaps, overlaps, missing required fields or out-of-vocabulary verbs** across 25 human-labelled keysteps in two egocentric cooking clips. A body-worn IMU showed measurable motion changes at some boundaries, but **not all task-to-task boundaries were distinguishable from random positions**. IMU motion is a useful review signal, **not proof of fine hand-action boundary accuracy**.
33
 
34
+ **Full article:** [Technical Field Note #05 — Keystep Annotation for Egocentric Robot-Learning Data](https://origindatalab.io/technical-field-notes/keystep-annotation-egocentric-robot-learning.html)
35
 
36
+ **Code and supporting evidence:** [GitHub — origin-data-lab/egocentric-keystep-annotation](https://github.com/origin-data-lab/egocentric-keystep-annotation) · [Hugging Face files](https://huggingface.co/datasets/origin-data-lab/egocentric-keystep-annotation/tree/main)
37
 
38
+ ---
39
+
40
+ ## Key results
41
 
42
  | Metric | Sample A — knife preparation | Sample B — seasonings and stirring |
43
  |---|---:|---:|
44
+ | Clip duration | 66.0 s | 65.967 s |
45
+ | Frames (30 fps) | 1,979 | 1,978 |
46
+ | Human-labelled keysteps / phases | **13 / 3** | **12 / 3** |
47
  | Gaps / overlaps | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |
48
  | Missing required fields | 0 | 0 |
49
  | Out-of-vocabulary verbs | 0 | 0 |
50
+ | Reported IMU-to-video alignment offset | 188 ms | 200 ms |
51
 
52
+ **Native IMU sampling rate:** 410.6 Hz. All findings are from two clips from one operator, not a population-level benchmark.
 
 
 
 
 
 
53
 
54
+ ![Keystep-labelled gyroscope timeline for the two evaluated clips](figures/keystep-timeline-gyro.webp)
55
 
56
+ *Human-labelled spans alongside the measured gyroscope signal; labels and motion do not always align one-to-one.*
57
 
58
+ ## What the boundary test shows
59
 
60
+ The test compares motion changes around labelled keystep boundaries against **2,000 random boundary sets** per comparison. The motion score uses gyroscope magnitude in windows around each boundary. Two comparisons include all boundaries; two exclude transitions involving non-task segments.
61
 
62
+ | Boundary set | n | Labelled score (°/s) | Random mean | Random p95 | p |
63
  |---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|
64
+ | A · all | 12 | **21.9** | 7.2 | 14.7 | 0.005 |
65
+ | B · all | 11 | **29.9** | 10.0 | 20.1 | 0.002 |
66
+ | A · task-to-task | 8 | 3.3 | 4.1 | 6.8 | **0.67** |
67
+ | B · task-to-task | 7 | **10.2** | 3.9 | 7.5 | 0.003 |
68
+
69
+ ![Labelled versus random-boundary motion comparison](figures/boundary-motion-test.webp)
70
+
71
+ **Interpretation.** Sample A's task-to-task boundaries were **not distinguished from random positions** by this test (p=0.67), while Sample B's were (p=0.003). Strong coarse-motion changes should not be mistaken for reliable detection of every hand-action transition.
72
+
73
+ ## Evaluation files
74
+
75
+ | Path | Contents |
76
+ |---|---|
77
+ | `boundary_motion_results.csv` | Four observed-versus-random boundary comparisons; suitable for tabular inspection |
78
+ | `annotation_example.jsonl` | **One** documented keystep annotation (`ks_A_01`, 0.0–7.5 s) |
79
+ | `figures/` | Five figures from the technical note, including the timeline and boundary test |
80
+
81
+ The public release is a **limited evaluation sample**. It does **not** contain the original videos, raw IMU signals or complete annotation files for all 25 keysteps.
82
 
83
+ ## Annotation format
84
 
85
+ The JSONL example describes an observed action span using `id`, `t_start`, `t_end`, `phase`, `verb`, `object`, `tool`, `active_hand`, `support_hand`, `instruction`, `state_before`, `state_after` and `outcome`.
86
 
87
+ ![Representative keystep frames for Sample A](figures/keystep-frames-knife.webp)
88
 
89
+ *Representative frames illustrate the action sequence; they are not a replacement for source video or full annotations.*
90
 
91
+ ## What this evaluation does not verify
92
+
93
+ - **Semantic correctness of all labels.** Structural QA verifies completeness and consistency, not whether each action was labelled correctly.
94
+ - **Fine-grained hand-action boundaries.** A wearer-mounted IMU may miss subtle hand manipulations or register unrelated torso/head movement.
95
+ - **Generalization.** Two clips from one operator cannot establish reliability across people, tasks, devices or environments.
96
+ - **A complete training dataset.** This release contains one annotation example and four boundary-test rows, not 25 downloadable keystep records.
97
+
98
+ ## Cite
99
+
100
+ ```bibtex
101
+ @misc{origindatalab2026fieldnote05,
102
+ author = {{Origin Data Lab}},
103
+ title = {Keystep Annotation and IMU Boundary Evaluation},
104
+ howpublished = {Technical Field Note \#05},
105
+ year = {2026},
106
+ url = {https://origindatalab.io/technical-field-notes/keystep-annotation-egocentric-robot-learning.html}
107
+ }
108
+ ```
109
+
110
+ Or:
111
+
112
+ ```text
113
+ Origin Data Lab (2026). Keystep Annotation and IMU Boundary Evaluation. Technical Field Note #05.
114
+ https://origindatalab.io/technical-field-notes/keystep-annotation-egocentric-robot-learning.html
115
+ ```
116
+
117
+ ## License
118
+
119
+ This evaluation package is marked **rights reserved**. It is **not** licensed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 terms used by some earlier field-note repositories. Request permission before redistributing or reusing the text, results or figures beyond applicable exceptions.
120
+
121
+ ## Related
122
+
123
+ - [All Technical Field Notes](https://origindatalab.io/technical-field-notes/)
124
+ - [한국어 — 키스텝 어노테이션 검증 (Field Note #05)](https://origindatalab.io/ko/technical-field-notes/keystep-annotation-egocentric-robot-learning.html)
125
+ - [#04 Stereo Calibration Validation](https://origindatalab.io/technical-field-notes/stereo-calibration-check.html) · [dataset card](https://huggingface.co/datasets/origindatalab/stereo-calibration-validation)
126
+
127
+ ---
128
 
129
+ **Origin Data Lab** — real-world data production for Physical AI and robotics · [origindatalab.io](https://origindatalab.io) · [contact@origindatalab.io](mailto:contact@origindatalab.io)
130
 
131
+ Need evaluation-ready egocentric data with annotation and QC requirements tailored to your project? [Contact us](https://origindatalab.io/contact.html).