File size: 3,801 Bytes
49665ce 76359b1 49665ce 76359b1 49665ce 76359b1 49665ce | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 | # CodeQL comparison
This track compares CodeQL with the saved Jev run on the same public method
pairs. CodeQL analyzes each repository snapshot. Jev's saved decision for each
method is read from `predictions/current/`.
CodeQL evaluated 682 bug pairs and 305 security pairs. It scanned Python,
JavaScript, TypeScript, C and C++ repositories listed in
[`codeql-cohort.json`](codeql-cohort.json). Each counted pair has both source
versions available, both target files extracted, and method text matching
the benchmark's recorded lines.
Of the 937 eligible bug pairs, 159 lacked recoverable source files, 72 failed
source verification, and 24 had failed CodeQL analysis. Of the 323 eligible
security pairs, 18 had failed analysis. Each database-creation or analysis
stage had a 30-minute timeout. Unscored pairs are excluded from the counts.
The main benchmark tables mark CodeQL's coverage with an asterisk.
[`results.json`](codeql-comparison/results.json) includes the exclusions and
Jev's results on the same successfully scored pairs.
Input revisions for this run: `bug-pairs-public@80cc6cbcf4b44e140706bcef3d40336ae81e7a05`,
`security-pairs-public@0b3312a609892f4383e8252841ea94fdf74b2935`, and
the SWE-rebench V2 Parquet file with SHA-256
`0e0bf9355f892ad74ae98d4e1c404f39fd6654a8e351ee3e6ab162e4a64cd3ad`.
CodeQL CLI 2.27.1 runs the published `security-extended` suite for security
and `security-and-quality` for bugs. The query packs are pinned to
`codeql/python-queries@1.8.11`, `codeql/javascript-queries@2.4.6`, and
`codeql/cpp-queries@1.9.0`. For the bug track, only results tagged
`correctness`, `reliability`, or `security` count; pure maintainability advice
does not represent a bug. A finding counts for a method only when its primary
SARIF location overlaps that method's recorded source lines. A finding
elsewhere in the file is not assigned to the method.
Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, C, and C++ snapshots use CodeQL's no-build
extraction. For [SWE-rebench V2](https://huggingface.co/datasets/nebius/SWE-rebench-V2)
bug pairs, the runner applies the dataset's gold patch to its pinned
`base_commit` to reconstruct the repaired repository. It does not run project
code or tests.
To reproduce, download the public `benchmark.jsonl` files from
[`bug-pairs-public`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/perchscan/bug-pairs-public)
and [`security-pairs-public`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/perchscan/security-pairs-public)
into `public/bug/` and `public/security/`. Download SWE-rebench V2's `train`
Parquet file separately. Install Docker, the CodeQL CLI for your Docker
architecture, its three query packs at the versions above, and DuckDB. Then
run:
```sh
python3 codeql_compare.py scan \
--root /path/to/codeql-work \
--data /path/to/public \
--predictions predictions/current \
--codeql /path/to/codeql \
--rebench-parquet /path/to/swe-rebench-train.parquet \
--all-supported --jobs 4 --scan-timeout 1800
python3 codeql_compare.py score \
--root /path/to/codeql-work \
--data /path/to/public \
--predictions predictions/current \
--all-supported
```
The runner writes per-pair decisions and aggregate counts under the work
directory. It resumes completed databases and SARIF analyses. CodeQL reports
binary findings here, so it has no average-precision score or threshold curve
to compare with Jev's probabilities. The semantic lint track is not included:
stock CodeQL queries do not take the pair's written behavior rule as input.
[GitHub's CodeQL documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/codeql/codeql-query-suites)
describes the built-in suites and their intended coverage. The
[CLI terms](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/codeql/codeql-cli)
cover its use on public repositories.
|