Remove SecureBERT from benchmark rankings (#15)
Browse files- Remove SecureBERT from benchmark rankings (279a525d191066e434ddaeb42796c72c22cacbd9)
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -44,8 +44,7 @@ AP (average precision) measures ranking across score cutoffs. For the other metr
|
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
| Model | AP | Precision at 0.5 | Recall at 0.5 | F1 at 0.5 | TP | FP | FN | Pair order |
|
| 46 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
|
| 47 |
-
| [
|
| 48 |
-
| [CLM-v0.1-8B](https://huggingface.co/Contrastive-LM/CLM-v0.1-8B)† | 44.0% | 43.6% | 64.9% | 52.1% | 741 | 959 | 401 | 41.5% |
|
| 49 |
| [JevK5](https://huggingface.co/alibiserikbay/JevK5) | 44.8% | 46.4% | 12.4% | 19.6% | 142 | 164 | 1000 | 30.6% |
|
| 50 |
| [Jev](https://typesafe.ai/blog/introducing-system-one-models-and-jev) | **49.2%** | **54.4%** | 10.2% | 17.2% | 117 | 98 | 1025 | 40.5% |
|
| 51 |
| [jev-lite](https://huggingface.co/vagmi/jev-lite) | 43.3% | 36.0% | 3.2% | 5.8% | 36 | **64** | 1106 | 22.9% |
|
|
@@ -54,15 +53,12 @@ AP (average precision) measures ranking across score cutoffs. For the other metr
|
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
| Model | AP | Precision at 0.5 | Recall at 0.5 | F1 at 0.5 | TP | FP | FN | Pair order |
|
| 56 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
|
| 57 |
-
| [
|
| 58 |
-
| [CLM-v0.1-8B](https://huggingface.co/Contrastive-LM/CLM-v0.1-8B)† | 47.1% | 46.9% | 67.8% | 55.4% | 270 | 306 | 128 | 52.8% |
|
| 59 |
| [JevK5](https://huggingface.co/alibiserikbay/JevK5) | 47.4% | 45.0% | 4.5% | 8.2% | 18 | 22 | 380 | 37.9% |
|
| 60 |
| [Jev](https://typesafe.ai/blog/introducing-system-one-models-and-jev) | **48.9%** | **52.6%** | 2.5% | 4.8% | 10 | **9** | 388 | 36.2% |
|
| 61 |
| [jev-lite](https://huggingface.co/vagmi/jev-lite) | 47.3% | 43.8% | 1.8% | 3.4% | 7 | **9** | 391 | 29.4% |
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
-
† CLM-v0.1-8B uses its choice head with a 6,144-token encoder
|
| 64 |
-
|
| 65 |
-
At 0.5, SecureBERT2.0 flags nearly every security method. Its high F1 therefore does not indicate useful alerting precision.
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
## Files
|
| 68 |
|
|
|
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
| Model | AP | Precision at 0.5 | Recall at 0.5 | F1 at 0.5 | TP | FP | FN | Pair order |
|
| 46 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
|
| 47 |
+
| [CLM-v0.1-8B](https://huggingface.co/Contrastive-LM/CLM-v0.1-8B)† | 44.0% | 43.6% | **64.9%** | **52.1%** | **741** | 959 | **401** | **41.5%** |
|
|
|
|
| 48 |
| [JevK5](https://huggingface.co/alibiserikbay/JevK5) | 44.8% | 46.4% | 12.4% | 19.6% | 142 | 164 | 1000 | 30.6% |
|
| 49 |
| [Jev](https://typesafe.ai/blog/introducing-system-one-models-and-jev) | **49.2%** | **54.4%** | 10.2% | 17.2% | 117 | 98 | 1025 | 40.5% |
|
| 50 |
| [jev-lite](https://huggingface.co/vagmi/jev-lite) | 43.3% | 36.0% | 3.2% | 5.8% | 36 | **64** | 1106 | 22.9% |
|
|
|
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
| Model | AP | Precision at 0.5 | Recall at 0.5 | F1 at 0.5 | TP | FP | FN | Pair order |
|
| 55 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
|
| 56 |
+
| [CLM-v0.1-8B](https://huggingface.co/Contrastive-LM/CLM-v0.1-8B)† | 47.1% | 46.9% | **67.8%** | **55.4%** | **270** | 306 | **128** | **52.8%** |
|
|
|
|
| 57 |
| [JevK5](https://huggingface.co/alibiserikbay/JevK5) | 47.4% | 45.0% | 4.5% | 8.2% | 18 | 22 | 380 | 37.9% |
|
| 58 |
| [Jev](https://typesafe.ai/blog/introducing-system-one-models-and-jev) | **48.9%** | **52.6%** | 2.5% | 4.8% | 10 | **9** | 388 | 36.2% |
|
| 59 |
| [jev-lite](https://huggingface.co/vagmi/jev-lite) | 47.3% | 43.8% | 1.8% | 3.4% | 7 | **9** | 391 | 29.4% |
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
+
† CLM-v0.1-8B uses its choice head with a 6,144-token encoder. All models are scored on the same method sides and labels within each track.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
## Files
|
| 64 |
|