File size: 2,112 Bytes
9b7bd53
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
{
 "what": "paper 2's figures 2, 3 and 4 per Design \u00a75",
 "figure_1_source": "_abl_dl/validation/ablation/FULL_*.json, the 200-mask run, 16 constructs at 3 references. Panel (b) is now in NATS: the carriers' loss rise minus the random sets' MEAN rise, signed, with construct-bootstrap intervals (ABLATION_NATS.json). Control units were dropped from the panel because at 83.9 B and 2,034 B the control SD is ~2.2x its own mean and still rising with the mask count, so the unit's denominator has not converged; they remain in Table D.1 with a per-cell stability flag. The draft's 1.0 / 3.3 / 5.2 control units came from a 20-mask control and fall to 0.79 / 2.27 / 3.97 at 200 masks. No retention ratio is quoted (23 Oct).",
 "figure_4_withdrawn": "the stability-by-band figure plotted the withdrawn fit and is replaced by return (B17b) and convergence (SCOPE_OVERLAP)",
 "figures_5_and_6": "not produced; the Settle chat withdrew them",
 "ceilings": "computed at EACH start point (CEILINGS.json), not once",
 "b11_shape_note": "detection is 0% at 1 T and 1.5 T for the EXPONENTIAL shape only; the step shape is detected at 99.4% there. The draft's \u00a73.2 says 'under both shapes' and is wrong.",
 "files": [
  "FIG1_three_timescales.png",
  "FIG1_three_timescales.svg",
  "FIG2_rate_fit_free.png",
  "FIG2_rate_fit_free.svg",
  "FIG3_power_of_the_null.png",
  "FIG3_power_of_the_null.svg",
  "FIG4_return_and_convergence.png",
  "FIG4_return_and_convergence.svg"
 ],
 "figure_2_source": "RATE_READINGS.json primary (fit-free); B10's fitted curves are deliberately not drawn (negative R^2)",
 "minutes": 0.01603101889292399,
 "provenance": {
  "inputs": [
   "validation/paper2/B10_SPACING_ADJUSTED.json",
   "validation/paper2/B3_ALLPAIRS.json",
   "validation/paper2/B11_POWER.json",
   "validation/paper2/B14_BANDS.json",
   "validation/carriers/*.npz for figure 2(a)'s points"
  ],
  "reference": null,
  "battery_prompt_hash": "570b42db13f8fe5772b8d1a9ad7d55d6fa1279dae5948ad94e8363789bcbc1ad",
  "code_commit": "8ae1dbe",
  "design": "9-Paper-1/2610-18Oct_PAPER-1-Design.md sha256 47f6a664\u2026"
 }
}