pymaster commited on
Commit
bb7ee5d
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): cd2ba9f

Add CrawlSinger-OS dataset card

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +184 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,187 @@
1
  ---
 
2
  license: mit
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3
  ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
  ---
2
+ pretty_name: CrawlSinger-OS
3
  license: mit
4
+ language:
5
+ - zh
6
+ task_categories:
7
+ - text-to-speech
8
+ - text-to-audio
9
+ - automatic-speech-recognition
10
+ size_categories:
11
+ - 100K<n<1M
12
+ tags:
13
+ - audio
14
+ - music
15
+ - singing
16
+ - singing-voice-synthesis
17
+ - music-score
18
+ - arxiv:2607.27768
19
  ---
20
+
21
+ # CrawlSinger-OS
22
+
23
+ CrawlSinger-OS is a large-scale, open-source singing corpus constructed for
24
+ score-native singing voice synthesis. It contains more than **2,300 hours** of
25
+ processed singing data from multiple public song and singing collections, with
26
+ a unified annotation scheme for lyrics, MIDI pitches, symbolic note values,
27
+ lyric-to-note alignment, and global tempo.
28
+
29
+ - [VocalRender paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27768)
30
+ - [VocalRender code](https://github.com/pymaster17/VocalRender)
31
+ - [VocalRender checkpoints](https://huggingface.co/pymaster/VocalRender)
32
+
33
+ ## Why CrawlSinger-OS
34
+
35
+ Modern singing synthesizers benefit from large and diverse training corpora,
36
+ but conventional SVS datasets are usually smaller than 100 hours. CrawlSinger-OS
37
+ processes both synthetic and real-world music with the same pipeline and score
38
+ representation, providing the scale and fine-grained lyric--note alignment
39
+ needed to train VocalRender's autoregressive diffusion architecture.
40
+
41
+ The core CrawlSinger-OS release contains:
42
+
43
+ | Source | Processed hours | Segments | Type | Original annotation |
44
+ | --- | ---: | ---: | --- | --- |
45
+ | Muse (Chinese subset) | 2,013 | 601k | Synthetic songs | Time-aligned lyrics |
46
+ | MuChin | 158 | 84k | Real songs | Time-aligned lyrics |
47
+ | SongFormDB (Ext) | 93 | 48k | Real songs | None |
48
+ | OpenSinger | 53 | 43k | Real singing | Lyrics |
49
+ | **Total** | **2,317** | **776k** | Synthetic + real | Unified below |
50
+
51
+ Synthetic and real subsets have different musical and semantic distributions.
52
+ The paper therefore trains on them in two stages instead of treating them as
53
+ interchangeable data.
54
+
55
+ ## Data construction
56
+
57
+ The SingCrawl processing pipeline has four stages:
58
+
59
+ 1. **Vocal extraction.** Cascaded mel-RoFormer models remove accompaniment and
60
+ reverberation from song audio.
61
+ 2. **Slicing and lyric transcription.** Audio is divided into clips shorter
62
+ than 30 seconds. Depending on the source annotations, the pipeline uses a
63
+ direct ASR path, a candidate-lyrics context-biasing path, or a refined
64
+ timestamp path.
65
+ 3. **Forced alignment.** A retrained SOFA aligner with G2PW produces
66
+ fine-grained lyric timing. On held-out GTSinger and M4Singer subsets, the
67
+ aligner reaches a mean IoU of 0.84 and VlabelerEditRatio (50 ms) of 0.092.
68
+ 4. **Pitch transcription.** ROSVOT transcribes note pitches; realized pitch
69
+ durations are quantized into symbolic note values and a global BPM reference.
70
+
71
+ ## Repository contents
72
+
73
+ The repository uses two storage layouts. `folder_based` sources keep per-song
74
+ metadata inside their tar archives; `json_file` sources provide a central
75
+ `annotations.json` plus audio archives.
76
+
77
+ | Path | Role | Layout | Archive size |
78
+ | --- | --- | --- | ---: |
79
+ | `muse/` | CrawlSinger-OS core | folder-based, 3 shards | 51.40 GB |
80
+ | `muchin/` | CrawlSinger-OS core | folder-based | 4.20 GB |
81
+ | `songformdb/` | CrawlSinger-OS core | folder-based | 2.34 GB |
82
+ | `opensinger/` | CrawlSinger-OS core | JSON + audio | 16.74 GB |
83
+ | `m4singer/` | Additional public training corpus | JSON + audio | 11.33 GB |
84
+ | `gtsinger/` | Additional public training corpus | JSON + audio | 19.36 GB |
85
+ | `opencpop/` | Evaluation corpus | JSON + audio | 5.03 GB |
86
+ | `manifest.json` | Layout, byte size, and SHA-256 for every shard | JSON | -- |
87
+
88
+ The complete repository is approximately 110.4 GB. Select only the subsets
89
+ needed for your experiment.
90
+
91
+ ## Annotation format
92
+
93
+ JSON-based sources contain a list of entries such as:
94
+
95
+ ```json
96
+ {
97
+ "item_name": "2002000039",
98
+ "word": ["你", "是", "我", "SP"],
99
+ "pitch": [50, 62, 60, 0],
100
+ "note": ["<NOTE_16>", "<NOTE_4>", "<NOTE_DOT_8>", "<NOTE_DOT_16>"],
101
+ "pitch2word": [0, 1, 2, 3],
102
+ "bpm": 81,
103
+ "wav_fn": "segments/wavs/2002000039.wav",
104
+ "word_dur": [0.17847, 0.84090, 0.51098, 0.25584],
105
+ "pitch_dur": [0.17847, 0.84090, 0.51098, 0.25584]
106
+ }
107
+ ```
108
+
109
+ | Field | Description |
110
+ | --- | --- |
111
+ | `word` | Lyric syllables; `AP`/`SP` denote non-lyric regions. |
112
+ | `pitch` | MIDI pitch per note segment; `0` denotes a rest. |
113
+ | `note` | Symbolic note-value token per note segment. |
114
+ | `pitch2word` | Maps each note segment to its lyric index and supports melisma. |
115
+ | `bpm` | Global tempo reference. |
116
+ | `wav_fn` | Audio path relative to the extracted source directory. |
117
+ | `word_dur`, `pitch_dur` | Optional realized durations for visualization and evaluation; they are not VocalRender conditioning fields. |
118
+
119
+ ## Download
120
+
121
+ Install the Hugging Face CLI, then download only the desired source:
122
+
123
+ ```bash
124
+ # Inspect the release manifest first
125
+ hf download pymaster/CrawlSinger-OS manifest.json \
126
+ --repo-type dataset \
127
+ --local-dir data/CrawlSinger-OS
128
+
129
+ # Example: download the processed OpenSinger subset
130
+ hf download pymaster/CrawlSinger-OS \
131
+ --repo-type dataset \
132
+ --include "opensinger/*" \
133
+ --local-dir data/CrawlSinger-OS
134
+ ```
135
+
136
+ Extract downloaded audio shards with `tar -xf`. Use the SHA-256 values in
137
+ `manifest.json` to verify large downloads.
138
+
139
+ ## Relationship to VocalRender and VocalRender-Pro
140
+
141
+ The two released models share the same score-native architecture: an
142
+ interleaved lyric--note representation, continuous AudioVAE latents, and an
143
+ autoregressive diffusion model that predicts acoustic patches and termination
144
+ without an explicit duration predictor.
145
+
146
+ | Model | Main training data | Training strategy | Main observed trade-off |
147
+ | --- | --- | --- | --- |
148
+ | **VocalRender** | CrawlSinger-OS (>2,300 h), with additional public singing corpora | 40k-step synthetic pretraining, then 20k-step real-data finetuning | Stronger subjective score following (MS-MOS 2.96). |
149
+ | **VocalRender-Pro** | CrawlSinger (>5,600 h of in-house real singing) | 160k steps with a global batch size of 32,768 continuous tokens | Better intelligibility, speaker similarity, naturalness, and OOD robustness; MS-MOS 2.71. |
150
+
151
+ On Opencpop, VocalRender-Pro reduces WER from 4.44 to 3.88 and improves speaker
152
+ similarity from 0.922 to 0.929. On CrawlSinger-Eval, WER changes from 4.52 to
153
+ 4.45 and similarity from 0.919 to 0.926. The paper attributes these gains to
154
+ the larger amount of real singing and broader singer coverage. Conversely,
155
+ VocalRender's higher score-following rating may result from more reliable and
156
+ precise score annotations in its finetuning subset.
157
+
158
+ Only **CrawlSinger-OS and the accompanying public corpora** are distributed in
159
+ this dataset repository. The in-house CrawlSinger training data used by
160
+ VocalRender-Pro is not included.
161
+
162
+ ## Limitations
163
+
164
+ - Most automatically produced scores are audio-centric transcriptions: they
165
+ describe realized ornaments and note splits rather than a composer's concise
166
+ intent-centric score.
167
+ - Synthetic and real subsets have noticeably different musical, semantic, and
168
+ pitch distributions.
169
+ - Automatically transcribed scores may contain chromatic fluctuations,
170
+ uncommon note values, or overly fragmented note sequences.
171
+ - The release primarily targets Mandarin singing and can contain errors from
172
+ separation, ASR, forced alignment, and pitch transcription.
173
+
174
+ ## Citation
175
+
176
+ ```bibtex
177
+ @article{chen2026vocalrender,
178
+ title = {VocalRender: Score-Native Singing Voice Synthesis for Real-World Composition},
179
+ author = {Chen, Yukun and Wang, Tianrui and Mu, Zhaoxi and Yang, Xinyu and Chng, EngSiong},
180
+ journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.27768},
181
+ year = {2026},
182
+ url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27768}
183
+ }
184
+ ```
185
+
186
+ Please also cite the original source datasets used by the subset(s) in your
187
+ work.