IdeaLens and ProseLens scores from the paper's final run (34/50 rewrites, 48/50 originals flagged by IdeaLens)

README.md

@@ -49,13 +49,11 @@ Writers are identified only by pseudonymous ids (`W01`-`W17`). No other informat
 | `generation_prompt` | the prompt that produced the original AI story |
 | `writer_outline` | the outline the writer worked from, one `[Role] content` line per item |
 | `words`, `text` | the story |
-| `idealens_p_ai`, `proselens_p_ai` | IdeaLens and ProseLens P(AI), from one extraction run |
+| `idealens_p_ai`, `proselens_p_ai` | IdeaLens and ProseLens P(AI), as reported in the paper |
 | `editlens_score`, `pangram4_p_ai` | EditLens-3B score; Pangram 4 weighted P(AI), its AI fraction plus half its AI-assisted fraction (flagged as AI at 0.5 or above) |
 
 ## Caveats
 
-- The IdeaLens scores here come from one outline extraction. The counts in the paper come from a separate
-  extraction, so they can differ by a few stories.
 - Fifty stories in one domain (short fiction) is a small evaluation set.
 
 ## Scoring

data/twicetold.parquet

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:8a728130f6a49a176b83d9fd70f4b09f8d9dced640d244bedc9529024a0f16eb
-size 334787
+oid sha256:dfd80be0a1903bbde15e745dac0a17d46f5d114142ecfe1bd692b0e787d7f8ae
+size 334808