openAI-math-dataset / lean /OAI /Algebra /Determinantal /AdjugateNormalForm.lean
roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 7)
216fb31 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
40.7 kB
import OAI.Algebra.Determinantal.ConductorLocalization
namespace OAI
namespace PermanentBorder.AdjugateAlgebra
open Matrix Polynomial
section Commutator
variable {K ι : Type*} [CommRing K] [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
theorem trace_commutator_adjugate (M Y : Matrix ι ι K) :
((M * Y - Y * M) * M.adjugate).trace = 0 := by
rw [sub_mul, Matrix.trace_sub, Matrix.trace_mul_cycle M Y M.adjugate,
Matrix.adjugate_mul, Matrix.mul_assoc Y M M.adjugate, Matrix.mul_adjugate]
simp
theorem trace_commutator_adjugate_scalar (A Y : Matrix ι ι K) (s : K) :
((A * Y - Y * A) * (s • (1 : Matrix ι ι K) + A).adjugate).trace = 0 := by
have he : (s • (1 : Matrix ι ι K) + A) * Y - Y * (s • 1 + A) =
A * Y - Y * A := by
simp only [add_mul, mul_add, Matrix.smul_mul, Matrix.mul_smul, one_mul, mul_one]
abel
rw [← he]
exact trace_commutator_adjugate _ _
end Commutator
section DiagonalCommutator
variable {K ι : Type*} [Field K] [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
theorem exists_diagonal_commutator (θ : ι → K) (hθ : Function.Injective θ)
(Y : Matrix ι ι K) (hY : ∀ i, Y i i = 0) :
∃ Z : Matrix ι ι K, Matrix.diagonal θ * Z - Z * Matrix.diagonal θ = Y := by
let Z : Matrix ι ι K := fun i j => Y i j / (θ i - θ j)
refine ⟨Z, ?_⟩
ext i j
simp only [Matrix.sub_apply]
rw [Matrix.diagonal_mul θ Z i j, Matrix.mul_diagonal θ Z i j]
dsimp only [Z]
by_cases hij : i = j
· subst j
simp [hY]
· have hne : θ i - θ j ≠ 0 := sub_ne_zero.mpr (fun h => hij (hθ h))
field_simp
end DiagonalCommutator
section PolynomialAdjugate
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {k : ℕ}
theorem natDegree_adjugate_linear_le
(A B : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) R) (i j : Fin (k+1)) :
(((X : R[X]) • A.map C + B.map C).adjugate i j).natDegree ≤ k := by
rw [Matrix.adjugate_fin_succ_eq_det_submatrix]
have hsub : ((X : R[X]) • A.map C + B.map C).submatrix j.succAbove i.succAbove =
(X : R[X]) • (A.submatrix j.succAbove i.succAbove).map C +
(B.submatrix j.succAbove i.succAbove).map C := by ext; rfl
rw [hsub]
calc
_ ≤ ((-1 : R[X]) ^ (↑j + ↑i)).natDegree +
((X : R[X]) • (A.submatrix j.succAbove i.succAbove).map C +
(B.submatrix j.succAbove i.succAbove).map C).det.natDegree := natDegree_mul_le
_ ≤ 0 + k := by
gcongr
· rw [show (-1 : R[X]) ^ (↑j + ↑i) = C ((-1 : R) ^ (↑j + ↑i)) by simp]
simp only [natDegree_C, le_refl]
· simpa using natDegree_det_X_add_C_le
(A.submatrix j.succAbove i.succAbove) (B.submatrix j.succAbove i.succAbove)
_ = k := zero_add _
theorem coeff_adjugate_linear
(A B : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) R) (i j : Fin (k+1)) :
(((X : R[X]) • A.map C + B.map C).adjugate i j).coeff k = A.adjugate i j := by
rw [Matrix.adjugate_fin_succ_eq_det_submatrix,
Matrix.adjugate_fin_succ_eq_det_submatrix]
have hsub : ((X : R[X]) • A.map C + B.map C).submatrix j.succAbove i.succAbove =
(X : R[X]) • (A.submatrix j.succAbove i.succAbove).map C +
(B.submatrix j.succAbove i.succAbove).map C := by ext; rfl
rw [hsub, show (-1 : R[X]) ^ (↑j + ↑i) = C ((-1 : R) ^ (↑j + ↑i)) by simp]
rw [coeff_C_mul]
congr 1
simpa using coeff_det_X_add_C_card
(A.submatrix j.succAbove i.succAbove) (B.submatrix j.succAbove i.succAbove)
end PolynomialAdjugate
section Slope
variable {K ι : Type*} [Field K] [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
noncomputable def spectralSlope (θ : ι → K) : Matrix ι ι K[X] :=
Matrix.diagonal (fun i => X + C (θ i))
theorem diagonal_zero_of_trace_slope (θ : ι → K) (hθ : Function.Injective θ)
(Y : Matrix ι ι K)
(h : (Y.map C * (spectralSlope θ).adjugate).trace = 0) : ∀ i, Y i i = 0 := by
intro i
have he := congrArg (Polynomial.eval (-θ i)) h
simp only [spectralSlope, Matrix.adjugate_diagonal, Matrix.trace,
Matrix.diag_apply, Matrix.mul_diagonal, Matrix.map_apply,
eval_finsetSum, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_prod, eval_add, eval_X, eval_zero] at he
have heq : (∑ j : ι, Y j j * ∏ l ∈ Finset.univ.erase j, (-θ i + θ l)) =
Y i i * ∏ l ∈ Finset.univ.erase i, (-θ i + θ l) := by
apply Finset.sum_eq_single i
· intro j _ hji
have hf : (∏ l ∈ Finset.univ.erase j, (-θ i + θ l)) = 0 := by
apply Finset.prod_eq_zero (Finset.mem_erase.mpr ⟨Ne.symm hji, Finset.mem_univ i⟩)
simp
simp [hf]
· simp
rw [heq] at he
have hp : (∏ l ∈ Finset.univ.erase i, (-θ i + θ l)) ≠ 0 := by
apply Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr
intro j hj
have hji := Finset.ne_of_mem_erase hj
intro hz
apply hji
apply hθ
exact eq_of_sub_eq_zero (by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] using hz)
exact (mul_eq_zero.mp he).resolve_right hp
end Slope
section Scaling
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] {k : ℕ}
noncomputable def pencilBase (θ : Fin (k+1) → K)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) :
Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K[X] :=
(X : K[X]) • (Matrix.diagonal θ).map C + A.map C
noncomputable def scaledPencil (θ : Fin (k+1) → K)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) :
Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K[X][X] :=
(X : K[X][X]) • (spectralSlope θ).map C + (A.map C).map C
noncomputable def liftCoefficients : K[X] →+* K[X][X] := Polynomial.mapRingHom C
noncomputable def scaledTrace (θ : Fin (k+1) → K)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K)
(Y : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K[X]) : K[X][X] :=
(Y.map liftCoefficients * (scaledPencil θ A).adjugate).trace
theorem scaledPencil_eq (θ : Fin (k+1) → K)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) :
scaledPencil θ A = (C (X : K[X]) * (X : K[X][X])) • (1 : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K[X][X]) +
(pencilBase θ A).map liftCoefficients := by
apply Matrix.ext
intro i j
simp only [scaledPencil, pencilBase, spectralSlope, Matrix.add_apply,
Matrix.smul_apply, Matrix.map_apply, Matrix.diagonal_apply, Matrix.one_apply,
liftCoefficients, map_add]
(split_ifs <;> simp [Polynomial.mapRingHom]); ring
theorem scaledTrace_commutator (θ : Fin (k+1) → K)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K)
(Z : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K[X]) :
scaledTrace θ A (pencilBase θ A * Z - Z * pencilBase θ A) = 0 := by
unfold scaledTrace
rw [scaledPencil_eq]
have hm : (pencilBase θ A * Z - Z * pencilBase θ A).map liftCoefficients =
(pencilBase θ A).map liftCoefficients * Z.map liftCoefficients -
Z.map liftCoefficients * (pencilBase θ A).map liftCoefficients := by
change (liftCoefficients (K := K)).mapMatrix _ = _
rw [map_sub, map_mul, map_mul]
rfl
rw [hm]
exact trace_commutator_adjugate_scalar _ _ _
theorem coeff_scaledTrace_top (θ : Fin (k+1) → K)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K)
(Y : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K[X]) (d : ℕ)
(hY : ∀ i j, (Y i j).natDegree ≤ d) :
(scaledTrace θ A Y).coeff (d+k) =
(Y.map (fun p => C (p.coeff d)) * (spectralSlope θ).adjugate).trace := by
simp only [scaledTrace, Matrix.trace, Matrix.diag_apply, Matrix.mul_apply,
Matrix.map_apply, finsetSum_coeff]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro i _
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro j _
change (Polynomial.map C (Y i j) *
((X : K[X][X]) • (spectralSlope θ).map C + (A.map C).map C).adjugate j i).coeff (d+k) = _
rw [coeff_mul_add_eq_of_natDegree_le
((natDegree_map_le).trans (hY i j))
(natDegree_adjugate_linear_le (spectralSlope θ) (A.map C) j i)]
simp only [coeff_map]
rw [coeff_adjugate_linear]
theorem diagonal_top_zero (θ : Fin (k+1) → K) (hθ : Function.Injective θ)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K)
(Y : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K[X]) (d : ℕ) (hd : 0<d)
(hY : ∀ i j, (Y i j).natDegree ≤ d)
(hT : (scaledTrace θ A Y).natDegree ≤ k) :
∀ i, (Y i i).coeff d = 0 := by
have hh := coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hT.trans_lt (by omega : k < d+k))
rw [coeff_scaledTrace_top θ A Y d hY] at hh
exact diagonal_zero_of_trace_slope θ hθ
(Y.map (fun p => p.coeff d)) hh
theorem scaledTrace_sub (θ : Fin (k+1) → K)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K)
(Y Z : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K[X]) :
scaledTrace θ A (Y-Z) = scaledTrace θ A Y - scaledTrace θ A Z := by
unfold scaledTrace
have hm : (Y-Z).map liftCoefficients = Y.map liftCoefficients - Z.map liftCoefficients :=
(liftCoefficients (K := K)).mapMatrix.map_sub Y Z
rw [hm, sub_mul, Matrix.trace_sub]
theorem pencil_commutator_expand (θ : Fin (k+1) → K)
(A Z : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) (d : ℕ) :
pencilBase θ A * ((X : K[X])^d • Z.map C) -
((X : K[X])^d • Z.map C) * pencilBase θ A =
(X : K[X])^(d+1) • (Matrix.diagonal θ * Z - Z * Matrix.diagonal θ).map C +
(X : K[X])^d • (A * Z - Z * A).map C := by
simp only [pencilBase, add_mul, mul_add, Matrix.smul_mul, Matrix.mul_smul,
smul_smul, Matrix.map_sub C (map_sub C), Matrix.map_mul, smul_sub, pow_succ]
rw [mul_comm X (X^d)]
module
theorem exists_lower_multiplier (θ : Fin (k+1) → K) (hθ : Function.Injective θ)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K)
(Y : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K[X]) (d : ℕ)
(hY : ∀ i j, (Y i j).natDegree ≤ d+1)
(hT : (scaledTrace θ A Y).natDegree ≤ k) :
∃ Y' : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K[X],
(∀ i j, (Y' i j).natDegree ≤ d) ∧ scaledTrace θ A Y' = scaledTrace θ A Y := by
let Ytop : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K := Y.map (fun p => p.coeff (d+1))
have hz : ∀ i, Ytop i i = 0 := diagonal_top_zero θ hθ A Y (d+1) (by omega) hY hT
obtain ⟨Z, hZ⟩ := exists_diagonal_commutator θ hθ Ytop hz
let W := pencilBase θ A * ((X : K[X])^d • Z.map C) -
((X : K[X])^d • Z.map C) * pencilBase θ A
refine ⟨Y-W, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro i j
apply natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mpr
intro n hn
have hW : W = (X : K[X])^(d+1) • Ytop.map C +
(X : K[X])^d • (A * Z - Z * A).map C := by
dsimp [W]
rw [pencil_commutator_expand, hZ]
rw [Matrix.sub_apply, coeff_sub, hW]
simp only [Matrix.add_apply, Matrix.smul_apply, Matrix.map_apply, smul_eq_mul,
coeff_add, mul_comm (_^_) (C _), coeff_C_mul, coeff_X_pow]
by_cases hnd : n = d+1
· subst n
simp [Ytop]
· have hlt : d+1 < n := by omega
rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt ((hY i j).trans_lt hlt)]
simp [hnd, show n≠d by omega]
· rw [scaledTrace_sub]
have hzero : scaledTrace θ A W = 0 := scaledTrace_commutator θ A _
rw [hzero, sub_zero]
theorem exists_constant_multiplier_of_bounded_scaledTrace
(θ : Fin (k+1) → K) (hθ : Function.Injective θ)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K)
(Y : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K[X]) (d : ℕ)
(hY : ∀ i j, (Y i j).natDegree ≤ d)
(hT : (scaledTrace θ A Y).natDegree ≤ k) :
∃ Y₀ : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K,
scaledTrace θ A (Y₀.map C) = scaledTrace θ A Y := by
induction d generalizing Y with
| zero =>
refine ⟨Y.map (fun p => p.coeff 0), ?_⟩
have he : (Y.map (fun p => p.coeff 0)).map C = Y := by
apply Matrix.ext
intro i j
exact (eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero (Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (hY i j))).symm
rw [he]
| succ d ih =>
obtain ⟨Y', hY', he⟩ := exists_lower_multiplier θ hθ A Y d hY hT
have hT' : (scaledTrace θ A Y').natDegree ≤ k := by rw [he]; exact hT
obtain ⟨Y₀, hY₀⟩ := ih Y' hY' hT'
exact ⟨Y₀, hY₀.trans he⟩
end Scaling
section OuterVariableReduction
variable {R ι : Type*} [CommRing R] [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
noncomputable def pencilMatrix (A : Matrix ι ι R) : Matrix ι ι R[X] :=
(X : R[X]) • (1 : Matrix ι ι R[X]) + A.map C
noncomputable def adjTrace (A Y : Matrix ι ι R) : R[X] :=
(Y.map C * (pencilMatrix A).adjugate).trace
@[simp] theorem adjTrace_zero (A : Matrix ι ι R) : adjTrace A 0 = 0 := by
simp [adjTrace]
theorem adjTrace_add (A Y Z : Matrix ι ι R) :
adjTrace A (Y+Z) = adjTrace A Y + adjTrace A Z := by
have hm : (Y+Z).map C = Y.map C + Z.map C := C.mapMatrix.map_add Y Z
simp only [adjTrace, hm, add_mul, Matrix.trace_add]
theorem adjTrace_neg (A Y : Matrix ι ι R) : adjTrace A (-Y) = -adjTrace A Y := by
have hm : (-Y).map C = -Y.map C := C.mapMatrix.map_neg Y
simp only [adjTrace, hm, neg_mul, Matrix.trace_neg]
theorem adjTrace_smul (A Y : Matrix ι ι R) (a : R) :
adjTrace A (a • Y) = C a * adjTrace A Y := by
have hm : (a • Y).map C = C a • Y.map C := by
apply Matrix.ext
intro i j
simp only [Matrix.map_apply, Matrix.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, map_mul]
simp only [adjTrace, hm, Matrix.smul_mul, Matrix.trace_smul, smul_eq_mul]
theorem X_mul_adjTrace (A Y : Matrix ι ι R) :
X * adjTrace A Y = adjTrace A (-(Y*A)) + C Y.trace * (pencilMatrix A).det := by
have hM : (X : R[X]) • (pencilMatrix A).adjugate =
(pencilMatrix A).det • (1 : Matrix ι ι R[X]) -
A.map C * (pencilMatrix A).adjugate := by
have he := Matrix.mul_adjugate (pencilMatrix A)
conv_lhs at he => rw [pencilMatrix, add_mul, Matrix.smul_mul, one_mul]
exact eq_sub_of_add_eq he
calc
_ = (Y.map C * ((X : R[X]) • (pencilMatrix A).adjugate)).trace := by
rw [Matrix.mul_smul, Matrix.trace_smul, smul_eq_mul]
rfl
_ = (Y.map C * ((pencilMatrix A).det • 1 -
A.map C * (pencilMatrix A).adjugate)).trace := by rw [hM]
_ = _ := by
rw [Matrix.mul_sub, Matrix.trace_sub, Matrix.mul_smul, mul_one,
Matrix.trace_smul, smul_eq_mul, ← Matrix.mul_assoc,
← Matrix.map_mul, adjTrace_neg]
have ht : (Y.map C).trace = C Y.trace := (AddMonoidHom.map_trace (C : R →+* R[X]) Y).symm
rw [ht]
dsimp only [adjTrace]
ring
def HasAdjugateNormalForm (A : Matrix ι ι R) (P : R[X]) : Prop :=
∃ (Y : Matrix ι ι R) (H : R[X]), P = adjTrace A Y + H * (pencilMatrix A).det
namespace HasAdjugateNormalForm
variable {A : Matrix ι ι R} {P Q : R[X]}
theorem zero : HasAdjugateNormalForm A 0 := by
exact ⟨0, 0, by simp⟩
theorem add (hP : HasAdjugateNormalForm A P) (hQ : HasAdjugateNormalForm A Q) :
HasAdjugateNormalForm A (P+Q) := by
obtain ⟨Y,H,rfl⟩ := hP
obtain ⟨Z,J,rfl⟩ := hQ
refine ⟨Y+Z,H+J,?_⟩
rw [adjTrace_add]
ring
theorem C_mul (hP : HasAdjugateNormalForm A P) (a : R) :
HasAdjugateNormalForm A (C a * P) := by
obtain ⟨Y,H,rfl⟩ := hP
refine ⟨a • Y, C a * H, ?_⟩
rw [adjTrace_smul]
ring
theorem X_mul (hP : HasAdjugateNormalForm A P) :
HasAdjugateNormalForm A (X*P) := by
obtain ⟨Y,H,rfl⟩ := hP
refine ⟨-(Y*A), C Y.trace + X*H, ?_⟩
rw [mul_add, X_mul_adjTrace]
ring
theorem mul (hP : HasAdjugateNormalForm A P) (f : R[X]) :
HasAdjugateNormalForm A (f*P) := by
induction f using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add f g hf hg => simpa only [add_mul] using hf.add hg
| monomial n a =>
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, mul_assoc]
apply HasAdjugateNormalForm.C_mul
induction n with
| zero => simpa using hP
| succ n ih => simpa only [pow_succ', mul_assoc] using ih.X_mul
end HasAdjugateNormalForm
noncomputable def cofactorIdeal (A : Matrix ι ι R) : Ideal R[X] :=
Ideal.span (Set.range fun ij : ι × ι => (pencilMatrix A).adjugate ij.1 ij.2)
theorem normalForm_of_mem_cofactorIdeal (A : Matrix ι ι R) (P : R[X])
(hP : P ∈ cofactorIdeal A) : HasAdjugateNormalForm A P := by
let J : Ideal R[X] :=
{ carrier := {P | HasAdjugateNormalForm A P}
zero_mem' := HasAdjugateNormalForm.zero
add_mem' := fun h h' => h.add h'
smul_mem' := fun f _ h => h.mul f }
have hle : cofactorIdeal A ≤ J := by
apply Ideal.span_le.mpr
rintro _ ⟨⟨i,j⟩, rfl⟩
change HasAdjugateNormalForm A ((pencilMatrix A).adjugate i j)
refine ⟨Matrix.single j i 1, 0, ?_⟩
simp [adjTrace, Matrix.map_single, Matrix.trace_single_mul]
exact hle hP
end OuterVariableReduction
section DegreeNormalForm
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {k : ℕ}
omit [IsDomain R] in
theorem natDegree_adjTrace_le
(A Y : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) R) :
(adjTrace A Y).natDegree ≤ k := by
unfold adjTrace
change (∑ i, (Y.map C * (pencilMatrix A).adjugate) i i).natDegree ≤ k
apply natDegree_sum_le_of_forall_le
intro i hi
rw [Matrix.mul_apply]
apply natDegree_sum_le_of_forall_le
intro j hj
apply le_trans (natDegree_C_mul_le _ _)
have hm : (1 : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) R).map C = 1 := by
exact C.mapMatrix.map_one
simpa only [pencilMatrix, hm] using natDegree_adjugate_linear_le (1 : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) R) A j i
theorem natDegree_det_pencilMatrix
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) R) :
(pencilMatrix A).det.natDegree = k+1 := by
have hm : (1 : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) R).map C = 1 := C.mapMatrix.map_one
have hc : (pencilMatrix A).det.coeff (k+1) = 1 := by
simpa only [pencilMatrix, hm, Fintype.card_fin, Matrix.det_one] using
coeff_det_X_add_C_card (1 : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) R) A
apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [pencilMatrix, hm, Fintype.card_fin] using
natDegree_det_X_add_C_le (1 : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) R) A
· exact le_natDegree_of_ne_zero (hc ▸ one_ne_zero)
theorem exists_multiplier_of_mem_cofactorIdeal
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) R) (P : R[X])
(hP : P ∈ cofactorIdeal A) (hdeg : P.natDegree ≤ k) :
∃ Y : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) R, P = adjTrace A Y := by
obtain ⟨Y,H,h⟩ := normalForm_of_mem_cofactorIdeal A P hP
have hH : H = 0 := by
by_contra hn
have hF : (pencilMatrix A).det ≠ 0 := by
intro hzero
have := natDegree_det_pencilMatrix A
simp only [hzero, natDegree_zero] at this
omega
have hd : (H*(pencilMatrix A).det).natDegree ≤ k := by
have he : H*(pencilMatrix A).det = P - adjTrace A Y := by rw [h]; ring
rw [he]
exact le_trans (natDegree_sub_le _ _) (max_le hdeg (natDegree_adjTrace_le A Y))
rw [natDegree_mul hn hF, natDegree_det_pencilMatrix] at hd
omega
refine ⟨Y, ?_⟩
simpa only [hH, zero_mul, add_zero] using h
end DegreeNormalForm
section BivariateScaling
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] {k : ℕ}
noncomputable def scaleHom : K[X][X] →+* K[X][X] :=
Bivariate.swap.toRingHom.comp (compRingHom (C X * X))
@[simp] theorem scaleHom_C (p : K[X]) : scaleHom (C p) = liftCoefficients p := by
simp [scaleHom, Bivariate.swap_C, liftCoefficients]
@[simp] theorem scaleHom_X : scaleHom (X : K[X][X]) = C X * X := by
change Bivariate.swap ((X : K[X][X]).comp (C X * X)) = _
rw [X_comp, map_mul, Bivariate.swap_X, Bivariate.swap_Y, mul_comm]
theorem scaleHom_injective : Function.Injective (scaleHom (K := K)) := by
apply (injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).2
intro p hp
have hc : p.comp (C X * X) = 0 := by
apply Bivariate.swap.injective
change Bivariate.swap (p.comp (C X * X)) = 0 at hp
simpa only [map_zero] using hp
rcases comp_eq_zero_iff.mp hc with h | ⟨_, h⟩
· exact h
· have hn := congrArg natDegree h
rw [natDegree_C_mul_X X X_ne_zero, natDegree_C] at hn
omega
theorem scaleHom_pencil (θ : Fin (k+1) → K)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) :
(pencilMatrix (pencilBase θ A)).map scaleHom = scaledPencil θ A := by
rw [scaledPencil_eq]
apply Matrix.ext
intro i j
simp only [pencilMatrix, Matrix.map_apply, Matrix.add_apply,
Matrix.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, Matrix.one_apply, map_add, map_mul]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem scaleHom_adjTrace (θ : Fin (k+1) → K)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K)
(Y : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K[X]) :
scaleHom (adjTrace (pencilBase θ A) Y) = scaledTrace θ A Y := by
unfold adjTrace scaledTrace
have ha : (pencilMatrix (pencilBase θ A)).adjugate.map scaleHom =
((pencilMatrix (pencilBase θ A)).map scaleHom).adjugate :=
RingHom.map_adjugate scaleHom _
rw [AddMonoidHom.map_trace, Matrix.map_mul, ha, scaleHom_pencil]
congr 2
apply Matrix.ext
intro i j
exact scaleHom_C _
theorem exists_constant_multiplier_of_mem_cofactorIdeal
(θ : Fin (k+1) → K) (hθ : Function.Injective θ)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) (P : K[X][X])
(hP : P ∈ cofactorIdeal (pencilBase θ A))
(houter : P.natDegree ≤ k) (htotal : (scaleHom P).natDegree ≤ k) :
∃ Y : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K,
P = adjTrace (pencilBase θ A) (Y.map C) := by
obtain ⟨Y, hY⟩ := exists_multiplier_of_mem_cofactorIdeal _ _ hP houter
have hs : (scaledTrace θ A Y).natDegree ≤ k := by
simpa only [hY, scaleHom_adjTrace] using htotal
obtain ⟨d, hd⟩ := (Set.finite_range (fun ij : Fin (k+1) × Fin (k+1) =>
(Y ij.1 ij.2).natDegree)).bddAbove
obtain ⟨Z, hZ⟩ := exists_constant_multiplier_of_bounded_scaledTrace θ hθ A Y d
(fun i j => hd ⟨(i,j), rfl⟩) hs
refine ⟨Z, scaleHom_injective ?_⟩
rw [hY, scaleHom_adjTrace, scaleHom_adjTrace]
exact hZ.symm
theorem scaleHom_monomial_monomial (a b : ℕ) (c : K) :
scaleHom (monomial a (monomial b c)) = monomial (a+b) (monomial a c) := by
simp only [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, map_mul, map_pow, scaleHom_C,
scaleHom_X, liftCoefficients, coe_mapRingHom, Polynomial.map_C, Polynomial.map_X]
simp only [mul_pow, pow_add]
ring
theorem coeff_scaleHom (P : K[X][X]) (d i : ℕ) :
((scaleHom P).coeff d).coeff i =
if i ≤ d then (P.coeff i).coeff (d-i) else 0 := by
induction P using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add P Q hP hQ =>
simp only [map_add, coeff_add, hP, hQ]
split_ifs <;> simp
| monomial a p =>
induction p using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add p q hp hq =>
simp only [map_add, coeff_add, hp, hq]
split_ifs <;> simp
| monomial b c =>
rw [scaleHom_monomial_monomial]
by_cases hai : a = i
· subst a
by_cases hib : i+b = d
· have hi : i ≤ d := by omega
have hb : b = d-i := by omega
simp [hi, hb]
· by_cases hi : i ≤ d
· have hb : b ≠ d-i := by omega
simp [coeff_monomial, hi, hib, hb]
· simp [coeff_monomial, hi, hib]
· by_cases hab : a+b = d <;> simp [coeff_monomial, hai, hab]
def TotalDegreeLE (P : K[X][X]) (d : ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ i j : ℕ, d < i+j → (P.coeff i).coeff j = 0
theorem TotalDegreeLE.outer {P : K[X][X]} {d : ℕ} (hP : TotalDegreeLE P d) :
P.natDegree ≤ d := by
apply natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mpr
intro i hi
ext j
simpa only [coeff_zero] using hP i j (by omega)
theorem TotalDegreeLE.scaled {P : K[X][X]} {d : ℕ} (hP : TotalDegreeLE P d) :
(scaleHom P).natDegree ≤ d := by
apply natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mpr
intro n hn
ext i
rw [coeff_scaleHom]
split_ifs with hi
· simpa only [coeff_zero] using hP i (n-i) (by omega)
· simp
theorem adjugate_generation
(θ : Fin (k+1) → K) (hθ : Function.Injective θ)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) (P : K[X][X])
(hP : P ∈ cofactorIdeal (pencilBase θ A)) (hdeg : TotalDegreeLE P k) :
∃ Y : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K,
P = adjTrace (pencilBase θ A) (Y.map C) :=
exists_constant_multiplier_of_mem_cofactorIdeal θ hθ A P hP hdeg.outer hdeg.scaled
theorem totalDegreeLE_iff_scaled_natDegree (P : K[X][X]) (d : ℕ) :
TotalDegreeLE P d ↔ (scaleHom P).natDegree ≤ d := by
refine ⟨TotalDegreeLE.scaled, ?_⟩
intro hd i j hij
have hc := coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hd.trans_lt hij)
have hh := congrArg (fun p : K[X] => p.coeff i) hc
simpa only [coeff_scaleHom, Nat.le_add_right, ↓reduceIte, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left,
coeff_zero] using hh
theorem TotalDegreeLE.mul {P Q : K[X][X]} {d e : ℕ}
(hP : TotalDegreeLE P d) (hQ : TotalDegreeLE Q e) :
TotalDegreeLE (P*Q) (d+e) := by
rw [totalDegreeLE_iff_scaled_natDegree, map_mul]
exact natDegree_mul_le.trans (Nat.add_le_add hP.scaled hQ.scaled)
theorem TotalDegreeLE.mono {P : K[X][X]} {d e : ℕ}
(hP : TotalDegreeLE P d) (hde : d ≤ e) : TotalDegreeLE P e :=
fun i j hij => hP i j (hde.trans_lt hij)
theorem totalDegreeLE_monomial (a b : ℕ) (c : K) :
TotalDegreeLE (monomial a (monomial b c)) (a+b) := by
rw [totalDegreeLE_iff_scaled_natDegree, scaleHom_monomial_monomial]
exact natDegree_monomial_le _
theorem coeff_adjTrace_eq_zero
(θ : Fin (k+1) → K) (A Y : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) (q : ℕ)
(hcrit : ∀ i j, (((pencilMatrix (pencilBase θ A)).adjugate i j).coeff q).coeff q = 0) :
((adjTrace (pencilBase θ A) (Y.map C)).coeff q).coeff q = 0 := by
simp only [adjTrace, Matrix.trace, Matrix.diag_apply, Matrix.mul_apply,
Matrix.map_apply, finsetSum_coeff, coeff_C_mul, hcrit, mul_zero,
Finset.sum_const_zero]
theorem critical_ideal_eq_zero
(θ : Fin (k+1) → K) (hθ : Function.Injective θ)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) (q : ℕ) (hq : 3*q ≤ k)
(hcrit : ∀ i j, (((pencilMatrix (pencilBase θ A)).adjugate i j).coeff q).coeff q = 0)
{P : K[X][X]} (hP : P ∈ cofactorIdeal (pencilBase θ A))
(hdeg : TotalDegreeLE P q) : P = 0 := by
ext a b
simp only [coeff_zero]
by_cases hab : a+b ≤ q
· have ha : a ≤ q := by omega
have hb : b ≤ q := by omega
let W : K[X][X] := monomial (q-a) (monomial (q-b) 1)
have hW : TotalDegreeLE (W*P) k :=
((totalDegreeLE_monomial (q-a) (q-b) (1 : K)).mul hdeg).mono (by omega)
have hWP : W*P ∈ cofactorIdeal (pencilBase θ A) :=
Ideal.mul_mem_left _ W hP
obtain ⟨Y, hY⟩ := adjugate_generation θ hθ A (W*P) hWP hW
have hz : (((W*P).coeff q).coeff q) = 0 := by
rw [hY]
exact coeff_adjTrace_eq_zero θ A Y q hcrit
have hca := coeff_monomial_mul P (q-a) a (monomial (q-b) (1 : K))
have hcb := coeff_monomial_mul (P.coeff a) (q-b) b (1 : K)
rw [Nat.add_sub_of_le ha] at hca
rw [Nat.add_sub_of_le hb, one_mul] at hcb
change (((monomial (q-a) (monomial (q-b) 1) * P).coeff q).coeff q) = 0 at hz
rw [hca, hcb] at hz
exact hz
· exact hdeg a b (by omega)
abbrev PlaneIndex (q : ℕ) := {p : Fin (q+2) × Fin (q+2) // p.1 < p.2}
theorem card_planeIndex (q : ℕ) : Fintype.card (PlaneIndex q) = (q+2).choose 2 := by
rw [Fintype.card_subtype]
simpa only [Fintype.card_fin] using (Fintype.card_product_filter_lt (α := Fin (q+2)))
noncomputable def planeMap (q : ℕ) : (PlaneIndex q → K) →ₗ[K] K[X][X] where
toFun f := ∑ i, monomial i.val.1.val (monomial (i.val.2.val-i.val.1.val-1) (f i))
map_add' f g := by simp [Finset.sum_add_distrib]
map_smul' c f := by simp [Finset.smul_sum, smul_monomial]
theorem coeff_planeMap (q : ℕ) (f : PlaneIndex q → K) (i : PlaneIndex q) :
(((planeMap q f).coeff i.val.1.val).coeff (i.val.2.val-i.val.1.val-1)) = f i := by
classical
simp only [planeMap, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk, finsetSum_coeff]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i]
· simp
· intro j _ hji
by_cases ha : j.val.1.val = i.val.1.val
· have hb : j.val.2.val-j.val.1.val-1 ≠ i.val.2.val-i.val.1.val-1 := by
intro h
apply hji
apply Subtype.ext
apply Prod.ext
· exact Fin.ext ha
· apply Fin.ext
have hi := i.property
have hj := j.property
change i.val.1.val < i.val.2.val at hi
change j.val.1.val < j.val.2.val at hj
omega
simp only [ha] at hb
simp [coeff_monomial, ha, hb]
· simp [coeff_monomial, ha]
· simp
theorem totalDegreeLE_planeMap (q : ℕ) (f : PlaneIndex q → K) :
TotalDegreeLE (planeMap q f) q := by
classical
intro a b hab
simp only [planeMap, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk, finsetSum_coeff]
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
intro i _
have hi := i.property
change i.val.1.val < i.val.2.val at hi
have hbnd := i.val.2.isLt
by_cases ha : i.val.1.val = a
· have hb : i.val.2.val-i.val.1.val-1 ≠ b := by omega
simp only [ha] at hb
simp [coeff_monomial, ha, hb]
· simp [coeff_monomial, ha]
theorem critical_cofactor_length
(θ : Fin (k+1) → K) (hθ : Function.Injective θ)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) (q : ℕ) (hq : 3*q ≤ k)
(hcrit : ∀ i j, (((pencilMatrix (pencilBase θ A)).adjugate i j).coeff q).coeff q = 0) :
((q+2).choose 2 : ℕ∞) ≤ Module.length K (K[X][X] ⧸ cofactorIdeal (pencilBase θ A)) := by
classical
let I := cofactorIdeal (pencilBase θ A)
let f : (PlaneIndex q → K) →ₗ[K] (K[X][X] ⧸ I) :=
(Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ K I).toLinearMap.comp (planeMap q)
have hf : Function.Injective f := by
apply LinearMap.ker_eq_bot.mp
apply LinearMap.ker_eq_bot'.mpr
intro P hP
have hmem : planeMap q P ∈ cofactorIdeal (pencilBase θ A) :=
Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.mp hP
have hz := critical_ideal_eq_zero θ hθ A q hq hcrit hmem (totalDegreeLE_planeMap q P)
funext i
have hc := congrArg (fun p : K[X][X] => (p.coeff i.val.1.val).coeff
(i.val.2.val-i.val.1.val-1)) hz
simpa only [coeff_planeMap, coeff_zero, Pi.zero_apply] using hc
have h := Module.length_le_of_injective (R := K) f hf
rw [Module.length_eq_finrank, Module.finrank_fintype_fun_eq_card, card_planeIndex] at h
exact h
theorem totalDegreeLE_cofactor (θ : Fin (k+1) → K)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) (i j : Fin (k+1)) :
TotalDegreeLE ((pencilMatrix (pencilBase θ A)).adjugate i j) k := by
rw [totalDegreeLE_iff_scaled_natDegree]
have ha : (pencilMatrix (pencilBase θ A)).adjugate.map scaleHom =
((pencilMatrix (pencilBase θ A)).map scaleHom).adjugate :=
RingHom.map_adjugate scaleHom _
have hh := congrArg (fun M => M i j) ha
change scaleHom ((pencilMatrix (pencilBase θ A)).adjugate i j) = _ at hh
rw [hh, scaleHom_pencil]
exact natDegree_adjugate_linear_le (spectralSlope θ) (A.map C) i j
theorem TotalDegreeLE.add {P Q : K[X][X]} {d : ℕ}
(hP : TotalDegreeLE P d) (hQ : TotalDegreeLE Q d) : TotalDegreeLE (P+Q) d := by
intro i j hij
simp only [coeff_add, hP i j hij, hQ i j hij, add_zero]
theorem TotalDegreeLE.sub {P Q : K[X][X]} {d : ℕ}
(hP : TotalDegreeLE P d) (hQ : TotalDegreeLE Q d) : TotalDegreeLE (P-Q) d := by
intro i j hij
simp only [coeff_sub, hP i j hij, hQ i j hij, sub_zero]
theorem TotalDegreeLE.sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → K[X][X]) {d : ℕ}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, TotalDegreeLE (f i) d) : TotalDegreeLE (∑ i ∈ s, f i) d := by
intro a b hab
simp only [finsetSum_coeff]
exact Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi => h i hi a b hab
noncomputable def diagonalContraction (θ : Fin (k+1) → K)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) (y : Fin (k+1) → K) : K[X][X] :=
adjTrace (pencilBase θ A) ((Matrix.diagonal y).map C)
theorem diagonalContraction_eq_sum (θ : Fin (k+1) → K)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) (y : Fin (k+1) → K) :
diagonalContraction θ A y = ∑ i, C (C (y i)) *
(pencilMatrix (pencilBase θ A)).adjugate i i := by
simp [diagonalContraction, adjTrace, Matrix.trace, Matrix.diag_apply,
Matrix.mul_apply, Matrix.diagonal_apply]
theorem diagonalContraction_mem (θ : Fin (k+1) → K)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) (y : Fin (k+1) → K) :
diagonalContraction θ A y ∈ cofactorIdeal (pencilBase θ A) := by
rw [diagonalContraction_eq_sum]
apply Ideal.sum_mem
intro i _
apply Ideal.mul_mem_left
exact Ideal.subset_span ⟨(i,i), rfl⟩
theorem totalDegreeLE_diagonalContraction (θ : Fin (k+1) → K)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) (y : Fin (k+1) → K) :
TotalDegreeLE (diagonalContraction θ A y) k := by
rw [diagonalContraction_eq_sum]
apply TotalDegreeLE.sum
intro i _
simpa only [zero_add, monomial_zero_left] using
(totalDegreeLE_monomial 0 0 (y i)).mul (totalDegreeLE_cofactor θ A i i)
noncomputable def slopeTrace (θ : Fin (k+1) → K) (y : Fin (k+1) → K) : K[X] :=
((Matrix.diagonal y).map C * (spectralSlope θ).adjugate).trace
theorem natDegree_adjugate_slope_le (θ : Fin (k+1) → K) (i j : Fin (k+1)) :
((spectralSlope θ).adjugate i j).natDegree ≤ k := by
have hs : spectralSlope θ = (X : K[X]) •
(1 : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K).map C +
(Matrix.diagonal θ).map C := by
ext i j
simp only [spectralSlope, Matrix.diagonal_apply, Matrix.add_apply, Matrix.smul_apply,
Matrix.map_apply, Matrix.one_apply, smul_eq_mul]
split_ifs <;> simp
rw [hs]
exact natDegree_adjugate_linear_le 1 (Matrix.diagonal θ) i j
theorem natDegree_slopeTrace_le (θ : Fin (k+1) → K) (y : Fin (k+1) → K) :
(slopeTrace θ y).natDegree ≤ k := by
simp only [slopeTrace, Matrix.trace, Matrix.diag_apply, Matrix.mul_apply,
Matrix.map_apply]
apply natDegree_sum_le_of_forall_le
intro i _
apply natDegree_sum_le_of_forall_le
intro j _
exact (natDegree_C_mul_le _ _).trans (natDegree_adjugate_slope_le θ j i)
noncomputable def slopeCoefficientMap (θ : Fin (k+1) → K) :
(Fin (k+1) → K) →ₗ[K] (Fin (k+1) → K) where
toFun y i := (slopeTrace θ y).coeff i
map_add' y z := by
ext i
simp [slopeTrace, Matrix.trace, Matrix.diag_apply, Matrix.mul_apply,
Matrix.diagonal_apply, finsetSum_coeff, coeff_C_mul, Finset.sum_add_distrib, add_mul]
map_smul' c y := by
ext i
simp [slopeTrace, Matrix.trace, Matrix.diag_apply, Matrix.mul_apply,
Matrix.diagonal_apply, finsetSum_coeff, coeff_C_mul, Finset.mul_sum, mul_assoc]
theorem slopeCoefficientMap_injective (θ : Fin (k+1) → K) (hθ : Function.Injective θ) :
Function.Injective (slopeCoefficientMap θ) := by
apply LinearMap.ker_eq_bot.mp
apply LinearMap.ker_eq_bot'.mpr
intro y hy
have hz : slopeTrace θ y = 0 := by
ext n
simp only [coeff_zero]
by_cases hn : n < k+1
· exact congrFun hy ⟨n,hn⟩
· exact coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt ((natDegree_slopeTrace_le θ y).trans_lt (by omega))
have h := diagonal_zero_of_trace_slope θ hθ (Matrix.diagonal y) hz
funext i
simpa only [Matrix.diagonal_apply_eq, Pi.zero_apply] using h i
theorem exists_diagonalContraction_top (θ : Fin (k+1) → K) (hθ : Function.Injective θ)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) (a : ℕ) (ha : a ≤ k) :
∃ y : Fin (k+1) → K,
(scaleHom (diagonalContraction θ A y)).coeff k = monomial a 1 := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := LinearMap.surjective_of_injective (slopeCoefficientMap_injective θ hθ)
(fun i => (monomial a (1 : K)).coeff i)
have hs : slopeTrace θ y = monomial a 1 := by
ext n
by_cases hn : n < k+1
· exact congrFun hy ⟨n,hn⟩
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt ((natDegree_slopeTrace_le θ y).trans_lt (by omega)),
coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt ((natDegree_monomial_le (1 : K) : (monomial a (1 : K)).natDegree ≤ a).trans_lt (by omega))]
refine ⟨y, ?_⟩
have ht := coeff_scaledTrace_top θ A ((Matrix.diagonal y).map C) 0 (by simp)
simp only [zero_add] at ht
rw [diagonalContraction, scaleHom_adjTrace, ht]
convert hs using 1
simp [slopeTrace]
theorem TotalDegreeLE.pred_of_top_zero {P : K[X][X]} {d : ℕ}
(hd : 0 < d) (hP : TotalDegreeLE P d) (hz : (scaleHom P).coeff d = 0) :
TotalDegreeLE P (d-1) := by
intro a b hab
by_cases hlt : d < a+b
· exact hP a b hlt
· have he : a+b = d := by omega
have hc := congrArg (fun p : K[X] => p.coeff a) hz
rw [coeff_scaleHom] at hc
simpa only [show a ≤ d by omega, ↓reduceIte, show d-a = b by omega,
coeff_zero] using hc
theorem exists_lower_monomial_representative
(θ : Fin (k+1) → K) (hθ : Function.Injective θ)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) (hk : 0 < k)
(a b : ℕ) (hab : a+b = k) :
∃ R : K[X][X], TotalDegreeLE R (k-1) ∧
monomial a (monomial b 1) - R ∈ cofactorIdeal (pencilBase θ A) := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := exists_diagonalContraction_top θ hθ A a (by omega)
let R := monomial a (monomial b (1 : K)) - diagonalContraction θ A y
refine ⟨R, ?_, ?_⟩
· apply TotalDegreeLE.pred_of_top_zero hk
· exact ((totalDegreeLE_monomial a b (1 : K)).mono hab.le).sub
(totalDegreeLE_diagonalContraction θ A y)
· simp only [R, map_sub, coeff_sub, scaleHom_monomial_monomial, hab,
coeff_monomial_same, hy, sub_self]
· simpa only [R, sub_sub_cancel] using diagonalContraction_mem θ A y
theorem eq_sum_bivariate (P : K[X][X]) :
P = ∑ a ∈ P.support, ∑ b ∈ (P.coeff a).support,
monomial a (monomial b ((P.coeff a).coeff b)) := by
calc
P = ∑ a ∈ P.support, monomial a (P.coeff a) := (sum_monomial_eq P).symm
_ = _ := by
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro a _
rw [← map_sum]
exact congrArg (monomial a) (sum_monomial_eq (P.coeff a)).symm
theorem map_mem_of_monomials {V : Type*} [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
(f : K[X][X] →ₗ[K] V) (W : Submodule K V) (P : K[X][X])
(h : ∀ a b, (P.coeff a).coeff b ≠ 0 →
f (monomial a (monomial b ((P.coeff a).coeff b))) ∈ W) : f P ∈ W := by
rw [eq_sum_bivariate P, map_sum]
apply Submodule.sum_mem
intro a ha
rw [map_sum]
apply Submodule.sum_mem
intro b hb
apply h
exact mem_support_iff.mp hb
theorem cofactor_quotient_spanned
(θ : Fin (k+1) → K) (hθ : Function.Injective θ)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) (hk : 0 < k) :
Submodule.span K (Set.range (fun i : PlaneIndex (k-1) =>
(Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ K (cofactorIdeal (pencilBase θ A)))
(monomial i.val.1.val (monomial (i.val.2.val-i.val.1.val-1) 1)))) = ⊤ := by
classical
let I := cofactorIdeal (pencilBase θ A)
let f := (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ K I).toLinearMap
let W := Submodule.span K (Set.range (fun i : PlaneIndex (k-1) =>
f (monomial i.val.1.val (monomial (i.val.2.val-i.val.1.val-1) 1))))
have hmon : ∀ d a b : ℕ, a+b = d → ∀ c : K, f (monomial a (monomial b c)) ∈ W := by
intro d
induction d using Nat.strong_induction_on with
| h d ih =>
intro a b hab c
have hscalar : monomial a (monomial b c) = c • monomial a (monomial b (1 : K)) := by
simp only [smul_monomial, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
rw [hscalar, map_smul]
apply W.smul_mem
by_cases hd : d < k
· let i : PlaneIndex (k-1) := ⟨(⟨a, by omega⟩, ⟨a+b+1, by omega⟩), by
change a < a+b+1
omega⟩
apply Submodule.subset_span
refine ⟨i, ?_⟩
change f (monomial a (monomial (a+b+1-a-1) (1 : K))) = _
rw [show a+b+1-a-1 = b by omega]
· let α := min a k
let β := k-α
have hα : α ≤ a := Nat.min_le_left _ _
have hβ : β ≤ b := by dsimp [β, α]; omega
have hsum : α+β = k := by dsimp [β, α]; omega
obtain ⟨R, hR, hmem⟩ := exists_lower_monomial_representative θ hθ A hk α β hsum
let Q : K[X][X] := monomial (a-α) (monomial (b-β) 1)
have heq : f (monomial a (monomial b 1)) = f (Q*R) := by
apply sub_eq_zero.mp
rw [← map_sub]
apply Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.mpr
have hh := I.mul_mem_left Q hmem
convert hh using 1
rw [mul_sub]
congr 1
simp only [Q, monomial_mul_monomial, one_mul]
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel hα, Nat.sub_add_cancel hβ]
rw [heq]
apply map_mem_of_monomials f W (Q*R)
intro u v huv
have hde : TotalDegreeLE (Q*R) ((a-α)+(b-β)+(k-1)) :=
(totalDegreeLE_monomial (a-α) (b-β) (1 : K)).mul hR
have hle : u+v ≤ (a-α)+(b-β)+(k-1) := by
by_contra hn
exact huv (hde u v (by omega))
exact ih (u+v) (by omega) u v rfl _
apply top_unique
intro x _
obtain ⟨P, rfl⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective x
apply map_mem_of_monomials f W P
intro a b _
exact hmon (a+b) a b rfl _
theorem finite_cofactor_quotient
(θ : Fin (k+1) → K) (hθ : Function.Injective θ)
(A : Matrix (Fin (k+1)) (Fin (k+1)) K) (hk : 0 < k) :
Module.Finite K (K[X][X] ⧸ cofactorIdeal (pencilBase θ A)) := by
classical
let g := fun i : PlaneIndex (k-1) =>
(Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ K (cofactorIdeal (pencilBase θ A)))
(monomial i.val.1.val (monomial (i.val.2.val-i.val.1.val-1) 1))
have hg := cofactor_quotient_spanned θ hθ A hk
change Submodule.span K (Set.range g) = ⊤ at hg
exact Module.Finite.of_fg_top (Submodule.fg_def.mpr ⟨Set.range g, Set.finite_range g, hg⟩)
end BivariateScaling
end PermanentBorder.AdjugateAlgebra
end OAI