Download lean/OAI/Combinatorics/Automata/Wiring.lean from roseking/openAI-math-dataset: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 18.8 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/roseking/openAI-math-dataset/resolve/main/lean/OAI/Combinatorics/Automata/Wiring.lean
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/roseking/openAI-math-dataset/lean/OAI/Combinatorics/Automata/Wiring.lean
-
curl -L -o Wiring.lean https://huggingface.co/datasets/roseking/openAI-math-dataset/resolve/main/lean/OAI/Combinatorics/Automata/Wiring.lean
18.8 kB
| import OAI.Combinatorics.Automata.Model | |
| namespace OAI | |
| namespace OneWayLiveness | |
| @[ext] structure Pairing (P : Type*) where | |
| link : P → P → Prop | |
| symm : ∀ {x y}, link x y → link y x | |
| irrefl : ∀ x, ¬ link x x | |
| unique : ∀ x, ∃! y, link x y | |
| namespace Pairing | |
| variable {P : Type*} (a : Pairing P) | |
| noncomputable def mate (x : P) : P := (a.unique x).choose | |
| lemma mate_link (x : P) : a.link x (a.mate x) := (a.unique x).choose_spec.1 | |
| lemma eq_mate {x y : P} (h : a.link x y) : y = a.mate x := | |
| (a.unique x).choose_spec.2 y h | |
| lemma mate_involutive : Function.Involutive a.mate := by | |
| intro x | |
| exact (a.eq_mate (a.symm (a.mate_link x))).symm | |
| lemma mate_ne (x : P) : a.mate x ≠ x := by | |
| intro h | |
| exact a.irrefl x (by simpa only [h] using a.mate_link x) | |
| lemma link_iff (x y : P) : a.link x y ↔ a.mate x = y := | |
| ⟨fun h => (a.eq_mate h).symm, fun h => h ▸ a.mate_link x⟩ | |
| instance [Finite P] : Finite (Pairing P) := | |
| Finite.of_injective Pairing.link (fun _ _ h => Pairing.ext h) | |
| end Pairing | |
| namespace Pairing | |
| variable {P : Type*} (a : Pairing P) | |
| /-- An assignment obeys all wire equalities. -/ | |
| def Compatible {C : Type*} (color : P → C) : Prop := | |
| ∀ x y, a.link x y → color x = color y | |
| /-- The equivalence relation whose classes are the pairs. -/ | |
| def connected (x y : P) : Prop := x = y ∨ a.link x y | |
| lemma connected_refl (x : P) : a.connected x x := Or.inl rfl | |
| lemma connected_symm {x y : P} (h : a.connected x y) : a.connected y x := by | |
| rcases h with h | h | |
| · exact Or.inl h.symm | |
| · exact Or.inr (a.symm h) | |
| lemma connected_trans {x y z : P} (h : a.connected x y) (k : a.connected y z) : | |
| a.connected x z := by | |
| rcases h with rfl | h | |
| · exact k | |
| rcases k with rfl | k | |
| · exact Or.inr h | |
| exact Or.inl ((a.eq_mate (a.symm h)).trans (a.eq_mate k).symm) | |
| noncomputable def testColor (x : P) (y : P) : Bool := by | |
| classical | |
| exact decide (a.connected x y) | |
| @[simp] lemma testColor_self (x : P) : a.testColor x x = true := by | |
| classical | |
| simp [testColor, connected] | |
| lemma compatible_testColor (x : P) : a.Compatible (a.testColor x) := by | |
| classical | |
| intro u v huv | |
| apply Bool.eq_iff_iff.mpr | |
| simp only [testColor, decide_eq_true_eq] | |
| constructor | |
| · intro h | |
| exact a.connected_trans h (.inr huv) | |
| · intro h | |
| exact a.connected_trans h (.inr (a.symm huv)) | |
| /-- Two-color constraints remember an entire matching, not just rank or | |
| connectivity among one side of its ports. -/ | |
| lemma eq_of_compatible {b : Pairing P} | |
| (h : ∀ c : P → Bool, a.Compatible c ↔ b.Compatible c) : a = b := by | |
| have sub : ∀ (a b : Pairing P), (∀ c : P → Bool, a.Compatible c → b.Compatible c) → | |
| ∀ x y, b.link x y → a.link x y := by | |
| intro a b hab x y hxy | |
| have he := hab (a.testColor x) (a.compatible_testColor x) x y hxy | |
| rw [a.testColor_self] at he | |
| have hc : a.connected x y := by | |
| simpa only [testColor, decide_eq_true_eq] using he.symm | |
| rcases hc with heq | hc | |
| · subst y | |
| exact (b.irrefl x hxy).elim | |
| · exact hc | |
| apply Pairing.ext | |
| funext x y | |
| apply propext | |
| exact ⟨sub b a (fun c => (h c).mpr) x y, sub a b (fun c => (h c).mp) x y⟩ | |
| end Pairing | |
| namespace FiniteWiring | |
| open SimpleGraph | |
| variable {V : Type*} [Fintype V] (G : SimpleGraph V) | |
| /-- A finite connected graph with degrees at most two has at most two leaves. | |
| The proof uses the degree-sum formula and the edge-count bound for a connected graph. -/ | |
| lemma leaves_card_le_two [DecidableRel G.Adj] (hc : G.Connected) (hd : ∀ v, G.degree v ≤ 2) : | |
| (Finset.univ.filter fun v => G.degree v = 1).card ≤ 2 := by | |
| classical | |
| have hb := hc.card_vert_le_card_edgeSet_add_one | |
| rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, | |
| ← G.edgeFinset_card] at hb | |
| have hs : (∑ v, G.degree v) + (Finset.univ.filter fun v => G.degree v = 1).card ≤ | |
| 2 * Fintype.card V := by | |
| calc | |
| _ = ∑ v, (G.degree v + if G.degree v = 1 then 1 else 0) := by | |
| rw [Finset.sum_add_distrib] | |
| simp | |
| _ ≤ ∑ _v : V, 2 := Finset.sum_le_sum fun v _ => by | |
| have := hd v | |
| split_ifs <;> omega | |
| _ = _ := by simp [Nat.mul_comm] | |
| rw [G.sum_degrees_eq_twice_card_edges] at hs | |
| omega | |
| /-- In a finite connected graph of maximum degree two, a leaf has exactly | |
| one other leaf. -/ | |
| lemma unique_other_leaf [DecidableRel G.Adj] (hc : G.Connected) (hd : ∀ v, G.degree v ≤ 2) (x : V) (hx : G.degree x = 1) : | |
| ∃! y : V, y ≠ x ∧ G.degree y = 1 := by | |
| classical | |
| have ho : Odd (G.degree x) := by simp [hx] | |
| obtain ⟨y, hyx, hyodd⟩ := G.exists_ne_odd_degree_of_exists_odd_degree x ho | |
| have hy : G.degree y = 1 := by | |
| have := hd y | |
| obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hyodd | |
| omega | |
| refine ⟨y, ⟨hyx, hy⟩, ?_⟩ | |
| intro z hz | |
| by_contra hzy | |
| have hsub : ({x, y, z} : Finset V) ⊆ Finset.univ.filter (fun v => G.degree v = 1) := by | |
| intro v hv | |
| simp only [Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton] at hv | |
| rcases hv with rfl | rfl | rfl <;> simp [hx, hy, hz.2] | |
| have hnum := Finset.card_le_card hsub | |
| have hbound := leaves_card_le_two G hc hd | |
| have hthree : ({x, y, z} : Finset V).card = 3 := by | |
| simp [Ne.symm hyx, Ne.symm hz.1, Ne.symm hzy] | |
| omega | |
| /-- Passing to a connected component preserves every vertex degree. -/ | |
| lemma component_degree [DecidableRel G.Adj] | |
| (C : G.ConnectedComponent) [Fintype C] [DecidableRel C.toSimpleGraph.Adj] (v : C) : | |
| C.toSimpleGraph.degree v = G.degree v.val := by | |
| classical | |
| rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree, ← card_neighborSet_eq_degree] | |
| apply Fintype.card_congr | |
| refine { | |
| toFun := fun w => ⟨w.val.val, w.property⟩ | |
| invFun := fun w => ⟨⟨w.val, (C.mem_supp_congr_adj w.property).mp v.property⟩, w.property⟩ | |
| left_inv := ?_ | |
| right_inv := ?_ } | |
| · intro w; rfl | |
| · intro w; rfl | |
| /-- Maximum degree two makes the reachable boundary pairing unique, even | |
| when other connected components are cycles. -/ | |
| lemma unique_reachable_leaf [DecidableRel G.Adj] | |
| (hd : ∀ v, G.degree v ≤ 2) (x : V) (hx : G.degree x = 1) : | |
| ∃! y : V, y ≠ x ∧ G.degree y = 1 ∧ G.Reachable x y := by | |
| classical | |
| let C := G.connectedComponentMk x | |
| let xc : C := ⟨x, rfl⟩ | |
| have hdc : ∀ v : C, C.toSimpleGraph.degree v ≤ 2 := by | |
| intro v | |
| rw [component_degree G C] | |
| exact hd v.val | |
| have hxc : C.toSimpleGraph.degree xc = 1 := by | |
| rw [component_degree G C] | |
| exact hx | |
| obtain ⟨y, hy, hu⟩ := unique_other_leaf C.toSimpleGraph C.connected_toSimpleGraph hdc xc hxc | |
| refine ⟨y.val, ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩ | |
| · intro he | |
| apply hy.1 | |
| exact Subtype.ext he | |
| · rw [component_degree G C] at hy | |
| exact hy.2 | |
| · exact (ConnectedComponent.exact y.property).symm | |
| · intro z hz | |
| let zc : C := ⟨z, ConnectedComponent.sound hz.2.2.symm⟩ | |
| have hzc : zc ≠ xc ∧ C.toSimpleGraph.degree zc = 1 := by | |
| constructor | |
| · intro he; exact hz.1 (congrArg Subtype.val he) | |
| · rw [component_degree G C]; exact hz.2.1 | |
| exact congrArg Subtype.val (hu zc hzc) | |
| /-- Contract all path components onto their boundary. The degree assumptions | |
| are precisely degree one at the exposed ports and degree zero or two | |
| elsewhere. Closed components disappear. -/ | |
| noncomputable def boundaryPairing {P : Type*} (port : P ↪ V) | |
| [DecidableRel G.Adj] (hd : ∀ v, G.degree v ≤ 2) | |
| (hb : ∀ v, G.degree v = 1 ↔ ∃ p, port p = v) : Pairing P where | |
| link x y := x ≠ y ∧ G.Reachable (port x) (port y) | |
| symm h := ⟨Ne.symm h.1, h.2.symm⟩ | |
| irrefl x h := h.1 rfl | |
| unique x := by | |
| classical | |
| obtain ⟨v, hv, hu⟩ := unique_reachable_leaf G hd (port x) ((hb _).mpr ⟨x, rfl⟩) | |
| obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (hb v).mp hv.2.1 | |
| refine ⟨y, ⟨?_, hv.2.2⟩, ?_⟩ | |
| · intro h; exact hv.1 (congrArg port h.symm) | |
| · intro z hz | |
| apply port.injective | |
| apply hu | |
| refine ⟨?_, (hb _).mpr ⟨z, rfl⟩, hz.2⟩ | |
| intro he; exact hz.1 (port.injective he).symm | |
| omit [Fintype V] in | |
| /-- Edge-compatible colors are constant along any finite path. -/ | |
| lemma color_eq_of_reachable {C : Type*} (color : V → C) | |
| (hc : ∀ x y, G.Adj x y → color x = color y) {x y : V} | |
| (h : G.Reachable x y) : color x = color y := by | |
| obtain ⟨p⟩ := h | |
| induction p with | |
| | nil => rfl | |
| | @cons x y z h p ih => exact (hc x y h).trans ih | |
| /-- Every compatible boundary coloring extends through the wiring. This | |
| justifies replacing a cell's wiring by its boundary matching. -/ | |
| lemma coloring_extension {P : Type*} (port : P ↪ V) | |
| [DecidableRel G.Adj] (hd : ∀ v, G.degree v ≤ 2) | |
| (hb : ∀ v, G.degree v = 1 ↔ ∃ p, port p = v) (color : P → Bool) : | |
| (boundaryPairing G port hd hb).Compatible color ↔ | |
| ∃ c : V → Bool, (∀ p, c (port p) = color p) ∧ | |
| ∀ x y, G.Adj x y → c x = c y := by | |
| classical | |
| constructor | |
| · intro hc | |
| have heq {p q : P} (h : G.Reachable (port p) (port q)) : color p = color q := by | |
| by_cases hpq : p = q | |
| · exact congrArg color hpq | |
| · exact hc p q ⟨hpq, h⟩ | |
| let touches (v : V) : Prop := ∃ p, G.Reachable v (port p) | |
| let c : V → Bool := fun v => if h : touches v then color h.choose else false | |
| have hc_at (v : V) (p : P) (hv : G.Reachable v (port p)) : c v = color p := by | |
| have ht : touches v := ⟨p, hv⟩ | |
| dsimp [c] | |
| rw [dite_eq_left ht] | |
| exact heq (ht.choose_spec.symm.trans hv) | |
| refine ⟨c, ?_, ?_⟩ | |
| · intro p | |
| exact hc_at (port p) p (.refl _) | |
| · intro x y hxy | |
| by_cases ht : touches x | |
| · obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := ht | |
| exact (hc_at x p hp).trans (hc_at y p (hxy.reachable.symm.trans hp)).symm | |
| · have hty : ¬ touches y := by | |
| intro hy | |
| obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := hy | |
| exact ht ⟨p, hxy.reachable.trans hp⟩ | |
| simp [c, ht, hty] | |
| · rintro ⟨c, hp, hc⟩ x y hxy | |
| have he := color_eq_of_reachable G c hc hxy.2 | |
| simpa only [hp] using he | |
| end FiniteWiring | |
| namespace Pairing | |
| variable {A B C : Type*} | |
| private def glueAdj (a : Pairing (A ⊕ B)) (b : Pairing (B ⊕ C)) : | |
| ((A ⊕ B) ⊕ (B ⊕ C)) → ((A ⊕ B) ⊕ (B ⊕ C)) → Prop | |
| | .inl x, .inl y => a.link x y | |
| | .inr x, .inr y => b.link x y | |
| | .inl (.inr i), .inr (.inl j) => i = j | |
| | .inr (.inl j), .inl (.inr i) => i = j | |
| | _, _ => False | |
| /-- Keep the two copies of the interface separate and join them by edges. | |
| This subdivision avoids parallel edges without changing boundary paths. -/ | |
| def glueGraph (a : Pairing (A ⊕ B)) (b : Pairing (B ⊕ C)) : SimpleGraph ((A ⊕ B) ⊕ (B ⊕ C)) where | |
| Adj := glueAdj a b | |
| symm := ⟨by | |
| intro v w h | |
| rcases v with (v | v) | (v | v) <;> | |
| rcases w with (w | w) | (w | w) <;> | |
| simp only [glueAdj] at h ⊢ | |
| all_goals first | exact a.symm h | exact b.symm h | exact h⟩ | |
| loopless := ⟨by | |
| intro v | |
| rcases v with (v | v) | (v | v) <;> | |
| simp only [glueAdj] | |
| all_goals first | exact a.irrefl _ | exact b.irrefl _⟩ | |
| def outer : (A ⊕ C) ↪ ((A ⊕ B) ⊕ (B ⊕ C)) where | |
| toFun | |
| | .inl i => .inl (.inl i) | |
| | .inr i => .inr (.inr i) | |
| inj' := by | |
| intro v w h | |
| rcases v with v | v <;> rcases w with w | w <;> simp_all | |
| noncomputable instance glueDec (a : Pairing (A ⊕ B)) (b : Pairing (B ⊕ C)) : | |
| DecidableRel (glueGraph a b).Adj := Classical.decRel _ | |
| variable [Fintype A] [Fintype B] [Fintype C] (a : Pairing (A ⊕ B)) (b : Pairing (B ⊕ C)) | |
| lemma glue_degree_LL (i : A) : (glueGraph a b).degree (.inl (.inl i)) = 1 := by | |
| classical | |
| have hn : (glueGraph a b).neighborFinset (.inl (.inl i)) = | |
| {Sum.inl (a.mate (.inl i))} := by | |
| ext w | |
| rw [SimpleGraph.mem_neighborFinset] | |
| change glueAdj a b _ w ↔ _ | |
| rcases w with (w | w) | (w | w) <;> | |
| simp [glueAdj, link_iff, eq_comm] | |
| simp only [SimpleGraph.degree, hn, Finset.card_singleton] | |
| lemma glue_degree_RR (i : C) : (glueGraph a b).degree (.inr (.inr i)) = 1 := by | |
| classical | |
| have hn : (glueGraph a b).neighborFinset (.inr (.inr i)) = | |
| {Sum.inr (b.mate (.inr i))} := by | |
| ext w | |
| rw [SimpleGraph.mem_neighborFinset] | |
| change glueAdj a b _ w ↔ _ | |
| rcases w with (w | w) | (w | w) <;> | |
| simp [glueAdj, link_iff, eq_comm] | |
| simp only [SimpleGraph.degree, hn, Finset.card_singleton] | |
| lemma glue_degree_LR (i : B) : (glueGraph a b).degree (.inl (.inr i)) = 2 := by | |
| classical | |
| have hn : (glueGraph a b).neighborFinset (.inl (.inr i)) = | |
| {Sum.inl (a.mate (.inr i)), Sum.inr (Sum.inl i)} := by | |
| ext w | |
| rw [SimpleGraph.mem_neighborFinset] | |
| change glueAdj a b _ w ↔ _ | |
| rcases w with (w | w) | (w | w) <;> | |
| simp [glueAdj, link_iff, eq_comm] | |
| simp [SimpleGraph.degree, hn] | |
| lemma glue_degree_RL (i : B) : (glueGraph a b).degree (.inr (.inl i)) = 2 := by | |
| classical | |
| have hn : (glueGraph a b).neighborFinset (.inr (.inl i)) = | |
| {Sum.inr (b.mate (.inl i)), Sum.inl (Sum.inr i)} := by | |
| ext w | |
| rw [SimpleGraph.mem_neighborFinset] | |
| change glueAdj a b _ w ↔ _ | |
| rcases w with (w | w) | (w | w) <;> | |
| simp [glueAdj, link_iff, eq_comm] | |
| simp [SimpleGraph.degree, hn] | |
| lemma glue_degree_le_two (v) : (glueGraph a b).degree v ≤ 2 := by | |
| classical | |
| rcases v with (v | v) | (v | v) | |
| · simp [glue_degree_LL] | |
| · simp [glue_degree_LR] | |
| · simp [glue_degree_RL] | |
| · simp [glue_degree_RR] | |
| lemma glue_boundary (v) : (glueGraph a b).degree v = 1 ↔ ∃ p, outer p = v := by | |
| classical | |
| rcases v with (v | v) | (v | v) | |
| · simp only [glue_degree_LL, true_iff] | |
| exact ⟨.inl v, rfl⟩ | |
| · simp only [glue_degree_LR, OfNat.ofNat_ne_one, false_iff, not_exists] | |
| intro p | |
| cases p <;> intro h <;> cases h | |
| · simp only [glue_degree_RL, OfNat.ofNat_ne_one, false_iff, not_exists] | |
| intro p | |
| cases p <;> intro h <;> cases h | |
| · simp only [glue_degree_RR, true_iff] | |
| exact ⟨.inr v, rfl⟩ | |
| noncomputable def compose : Pairing (A ⊕ C) := by | |
| classical | |
| exact FiniteWiring.boundaryPairing (glueGraph a b) outer | |
| (glue_degree_le_two a b) (glue_boundary a b) | |
| /-- Boolean boundary behavior composes as ordinary relational composition. -/ | |
| lemma compose_compatible (f : A → Bool) (g : C → Bool) : | |
| (compose a b).Compatible (Sum.elim f g) ↔ | |
| ∃ k : B → Bool, a.Compatible (Sum.elim f k) ∧ b.Compatible (Sum.elim k g) := by | |
| classical | |
| rw [compose, FiniteWiring.coloring_extension] | |
| constructor | |
| · rintro ⟨c, hc, he⟩ | |
| let k : B → Bool := fun i => c (.inl (.inr i)) | |
| have hk (i : B) : c (.inl (.inr i)) = c (.inr (.inl i)) := | |
| he _ _ (show (glueGraph a b).Adj (.inl (.inr i)) (.inr (.inl i)) from rfl) | |
| have hl (i : A) : c (.inl (.inl i)) = f i := hc (.inl i) | |
| have hr (i : C) : c (.inr (.inr i)) = g i := hc (.inr i) | |
| refine ⟨k, ?_, ?_⟩ | |
| · intro x y hxy | |
| have hh := he (.inl x) (.inl y) hxy | |
| rcases x with x | x <;> rcases y with y | y <;> | |
| simpa only [hl, Sum.elim_inl, Sum.elim_inr] using hh | |
| · intro x y hxy | |
| have hh := he (.inr x) (.inr y) hxy | |
| rcases x with x | x <;> rcases y with y | y <;> | |
| simpa only [← hk, hr, Sum.elim_inl, Sum.elim_inr] using hh | |
| · rintro ⟨k, hk₁, hk₂⟩ | |
| refine ⟨Sum.elim (Sum.elim f k) (Sum.elim k g), ?_, ?_⟩ | |
| · intro p; cases p <;> rfl | |
| · intro x y hxy | |
| rcases x with (x | x) | (x | x) <;> | |
| rcases y with (y | y) | (y | y) <;> | |
| simp only [glueGraph, glueAdj] at hxy | |
| all_goals first | |
| | exact hk₁ _ _ hxy | |
| | exact hk₂ _ _ hxy | |
| | exact congrArg k hxy | |
| | exact congrArg k hxy.symm | |
| end Pairing | |
| namespace Pairing | |
| variable {P Q : Type*} | |
| def ofInvolution (f : P → P) (hf : Function.Involutive f) (hn : ∀ p, f p ≠ p) : Pairing P where | |
| link x y := f x = y | |
| symm {x y} h := by rw [← h, hf] | |
| irrefl x := hn x | |
| unique x := ⟨f x, rfl, fun _ h => h.symm⟩ | |
| def transport (a : Pairing P) (e : P ≃ Q) : Pairing Q where | |
| link x y := a.link (e.symm x) (e.symm y) | |
| symm := a.symm | |
| irrefl x := a.irrefl _ | |
| unique x := by | |
| obtain ⟨y, hy, hu⟩ := a.unique (e.symm x) | |
| refine ⟨e y, ?_, ?_⟩ | |
| · simpa using hy | |
| · intro z hz | |
| exact (e.symm.injective (by simpa using hu (e.symm z) hz)) | |
| variable {A B C D : Type*} | |
| /-- A rectangular permutation diagram; arbitrary equivalences also allow | |
| renumbering finite port sets without changing the underlying diagram. -/ | |
| def bijection (e : A ≃ B) : Pairing (A ⊕ B) := | |
| ofInvolution (Sum.elim (Sum.inr ∘ e) (Sum.inl ∘ e.symm)) | |
| (by intro x; cases x <;> simp) (by intro x; cases x <;> simp) | |
| def identity (A : Type*) : Pairing (A ⊕ A) := bijection (Equiv.refl A) | |
| lemma bijection_compatible (e : A ≃ B) (f : A → Bool) (g : B → Bool) : | |
| (bijection e).Compatible (Sum.elim f g) ↔ ∀ x, f x = g (e x) := by | |
| constructor | |
| · intro h x | |
| exact h (.inl x) (.inr (e x)) rfl | |
| · intro h x y hxy | |
| rcases x with x | x <;> rcases y with y | y | |
| · cases hxy | |
| · change Sum.inr (e x) = Sum.inr y at hxy | |
| cases hxy | |
| exact h x | |
| · change Sum.inl (e.symm x) = Sum.inl y at hxy | |
| cases hxy | |
| simpa using (h (e.symm x)).symm | |
| · cases hxy | |
| lemma identity_compatible (f g : A → Bool) : | |
| (identity A).Compatible (Sum.elim f g) ↔ f = g := by | |
| rw [identity, bijection_compatible] | |
| exact funext_iff.symm | |
| lemma ext_colors {a b : Pairing (A ⊕ B)} | |
| (h : ∀ f : A → Bool, ∀ g : B → Bool, | |
| a.Compatible (Sum.elim f g) ↔ b.Compatible (Sum.elim f g)) : a = b := by | |
| apply a.eq_of_compatible | |
| intro c | |
| have hc : Sum.elim (fun i => c (.inl i)) (fun i => c (.inr i)) = c := by | |
| funext p; cases p <;> rfl | |
| simpa only [hc] using h (fun i => c (.inl i)) (fun i => c (.inr i)) | |
| /-- The Boolean equality semantics is faithful even for a single pair. -/ | |
| lemma connected_of_color_eq (a : Pairing P) (x y : P) | |
| (h : ∀ c : P → Bool, a.Compatible c → c x = c y) : a.connected x y := by | |
| have he := h (a.testColor x) (a.compatible_testColor x) | |
| rw [testColor_self] at he | |
| simpa only [testColor, decide_eq_true_eq] using he.symm | |
| lemma link_of_color_eq (a : Pairing P) {x y : P} (hne : x ≠ y) | |
| (h : ∀ c : P → Bool, a.Compatible c → c x = c y) : a.link x y := | |
| (a.connected_of_color_eq x y h).resolve_left hne | |
| variable [Fintype A] [Fintype B] [Fintype C] [Fintype D] | |
| lemma compose_assoc (a : Pairing (A ⊕ B)) (b : Pairing (B ⊕ C)) | |
| (c : Pairing (C ⊕ D)) : compose (compose a b) c = compose a (compose b c) := by | |
| apply ext_colors | |
| intro f g | |
| simp only [compose_compatible] | |
| aesop | |
| lemma identity_compose (a : Pairing (A ⊕ B)) : compose (identity A) a = a := by | |
| apply ext_colors | |
| intro f g | |
| simp [compose_compatible, identity_compatible] | |
| lemma compose_identity (a : Pairing (A ⊕ B)) : compose a (identity B) = a := by | |
| apply ext_colors | |
| intro f g | |
| simp [compose_compatible, identity_compatible] | |
| end Pairing | |
| end OneWayLiveness | |
| end OAI | |