roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 62)
2f887db verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
22.4 kB
import Mathlib
import OAI.Computability.MinUncut.Games.Target
namespace OAI
section
namespace MinUncutGames.Foundations.PCP
open Target
structure ClauseAnswer where
first : Bool
second : Bool
third : Bool
deriving DecidableEq
inductive Slot where
| first
| second
| third
deriving DecidableEq
def answerAt (answer : ClauseAnswer) : Slot → Bool
| .first => answer.first
| .second => answer.second
| .third => answer.third
def nameAt {n : Nat} (clause : Clause n) : Slot → Fin n
| .first => clause[0].variableIndex
| .second => clause[1].variableIndex
| .third => clause[2].variableIndex
def literalValue (positive value : Bool) : Bool :=
if positive then value else !value
def localSatisfies {n : Nat} (clause : Clause n) (answer : ClauseAnswer) : Bool :=
(literalValue clause[0].positive answer.first ||
literalValue clause[1].positive answer.second) ||
literalValue clause[2].positive answer.third
def honestAnswer {n : Nat} (clause : Clause n) (assignment : Fin n → Bool) : ClauseAnswer :=
⟨assignment clause[0].variableIndex, assignment clause[1].variableIndex,
assignment clause[2].variableIndex⟩
theorem honest_satisfies {n : Nat} (clause : Clause n) (assignment : Fin n → Bool) :
localSatisfies clause (honestAnswer clause assignment) = clause.eval assignment := rfl
theorem honest_answerAt {n : Nat} (clause : Clause n) (assignment : Fin n → Bool)
(slot : Slot) : answerAt (honestAnswer clause assignment) slot =
assignment (nameAt clause slot) := by
cases slot <;> rfl
def matchingSlots (a b : ClauseAnswer) : Nat :=
(if a.first = b.first then 1 else 0) +
(if a.second = b.second then 1 else 0) +
(if a.third = b.third then 1 else 0)
theorem matchingSlots_le (a b : ClauseAnswer) : matchingSlots a b ≤ 3 := by
rcases a with ⟨a₁,a₂,a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨b₁,b₂,b₃⟩
cases a₁ <;> cases a₂ <;> cases a₃ <;> cases b₁ <;> cases b₂ <;> cases b₃ <;> decide
theorem matchingSlots_eq_three (a b : ClauseAnswer) : matchingSlots a b = 3 ↔ a = b := by
rcases a with ⟨a₁,a₂,a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨b₁,b₂,b₃⟩
cases a₁ <;> cases a₂ <;> cases a₃ <;> cases b₁ <;> cases b₂ <;> cases b₃ <;> decide
def acceptedSlots {n : Nat} (clause : Clause n) (alice bob : ClauseAnswer) : Nat :=
if localSatisfies clause alice then matchingSlots alice bob else 0
def clauseFailure {n : Nat} (clause : Clause n) (assignment : Fin n → Bool) : Nat :=
if clause.eval assignment then 0 else 1
theorem local_rejection_bound {n : Nat} (clause : Clause n) (alice : ClauseAnswer)
(bob : Fin n → Bool) :
acceptedSlots clause alice (honestAnswer clause bob) + clauseFailure clause bob ≤ 3 := by
have hle := matchingSlots_le alice (honestAnswer clause bob)
by_cases hb : clause.eval bob = true
· simp only [clauseFailure, hb, ↓reduceIte, Nat.add_zero]
unfold acceptedSlots
split <;> omega
· have hfailure : clauseFailure clause bob = 1 := by simp [clauseFailure, hb]
rw [hfailure]
by_cases ha : localSatisfies clause alice = true
· have hne : alice ≠ honestAnswer clause bob := by
intro h
subst alice
exact hb ((honest_satisfies clause bob).symm.trans ha)
have hlt : matchingSlots alice (honestAnswer clause bob) ≠ 3 := by
intro h
exact hne ((matchingSlots_eq_three _ _).mp h)
simp only [acceptedSlots, ha, ↓reduceIte]
omega
· simp [acceptedSlots, ha]
def clauseAt (formula : Formula) (index : Fin formula.clauses.length) :
Clause formula.«variables» := formula.clauses[index.val]
abbrev RandomEvent (formula : Formula) := Fin formula.clauses.length × Slot
abbrev AliceStrategy (formula : Formula) := Fin formula.clauses.length → ClauseAnswer
abbrev BobStrategy (formula : Formula) := Fin formula.«variables» → Bool
def accepts (formula : Formula) (alice : AliceStrategy formula) (bob : BobStrategy formula)
(event : RandomEvent formula) : Bool :=
localSatisfies (clauseAt formula event.1) (alice event.1) &&
decide (answerAt (alice event.1) event.2 = bob (nameAt (clauseAt formula event.1) event.2))
def acceptedCount (formula : Formula) (alice : AliceStrategy formula)
(bob : BobStrategy formula) : List (Fin formula.clauses.length) → Nat
| [] => 0
| i :: rest => acceptedSlots (clauseAt formula i) (alice i)
(honestAnswer (clauseAt formula i) bob) + acceptedCount formula alice bob rest
def failureCount (formula : Formula) (bob : BobStrategy formula) :
List (Fin formula.clauses.length) → Nat
| [] => 0
| i :: rest => clauseFailure (clauseAt formula i) bob + failureCount formula bob rest
theorem total_rejection_bound (formula : Formula) (alice : AliceStrategy formula)
(bob : BobStrategy formula) (indices : List (Fin formula.clauses.length)) :
acceptedCount formula alice bob indices + failureCount formula bob indices ≤
3 * indices.length := by
induction indices with
| nil => simp [acceptedCount, failureCount]
| cons i rest ih =>
have h := local_rejection_bound (clauseAt formula i) (alice i) bob
simp only [acceptedCount, failureCount, List.length_cons]
omega
def allIndices (formula : Formula) : List (Fin formula.clauses.length) :=
List.finRange formula.clauses.length
theorem hastad_basic_verifier_soundness (formula : Formula) (a b : Nat)
(sourceGap : ∀ bob : BobStrategy formula,
a * formula.clauses.length ≤ b * failureCount formula bob (allIndices formula))
(alice : AliceStrategy formula) (bob : BobStrategy formula) :
b * acceptedCount formula alice bob (allIndices formula) + a * formula.clauses.length ≤
b * (3 * formula.clauses.length) := by
have ht := Nat.mul_le_mul_left b (total_rejection_bound formula alice bob (allIndices formula))
have hg := sourceGap bob
simp only [allIndices, List.length_finRange, Nat.mul_add] at *
omega
theorem honest_accepts (formula : Formula) (assignment : BobStrategy formula)
(satisfies : ∀ clause ∈ formula.clauses, clause.eval assignment = true)
(event : RandomEvent formula) :
accepts formula (fun i => honestAnswer (clauseAt formula i) assignment) assignment event = true := by
have hc : (clauseAt formula event.1).eval assignment = true :=
satisfies _ (List.getElem_mem _)
simp [accepts, honest_satisfies, honest_answerAt, hc]
theorem verifier_completeness (formula : Formula) (sat : formula.Satisfiable) :
∃ (alice : AliceStrategy formula) (bob : BobStrategy formula),
∀ event : RandomEvent formula, accepts formula alice bob event = true := by
rcases sat with ⟨assignment, hs⟩
exact ⟨fun i => honestAnswer (clauseAt formula i) assignment, assignment,
honest_accepts formula assignment hs⟩
abbrev LeftLabel (formula : Formula) (i : Fin formula.clauses.length) :=
{ answer : ClauseAnswer // localSatisfies (clauseAt formula i) answer = true }
def edgeProjection (formula : Formula) (event : RandomEvent formula)
(label : LeftLabel formula event.1) : Bool := answerAt label.val event.2
theorem verifier_eq_projection (formula : Formula)
(alice : ∀ i, LeftLabel formula i) (bob : BobStrategy formula) (event : RandomEvent formula) :
accepts formula (fun i => (alice i).val) bob event =
decide (edgeProjection formula event (alice event.1) =
bob (nameAt (clauseAt formula event.1) event.2)) := by
simp [accepts, (alice event.1).property, edgeProjection]
rfl
def eventsAt (formula : Formula) (i : Fin formula.clauses.length) : List (RandomEvent formula) :=
[(i, .first), (i, .second), (i, .third)]
def enumerateEvents (formula : Formula) : List (Fin formula.clauses.length) →
List (RandomEvent formula)
| [] => []
| i :: rest => eventsAt formula i ++ enumerateEvents formula rest
theorem length_enumerateEvents (formula : Formula) (indices : List (Fin formula.clauses.length)) :
(enumerateEvents formula indices).length = 3 * indices.length := by
induction indices with
| nil => simp [enumerateEvents]
| cons i rest ih =>
simp only [enumerateEvents, eventsAt, List.length_append, List.length_cons,
List.length_nil, ih]
omega
theorem accepted_eventsAt (formula : Formula) (alice : AliceStrategy formula)
(bob : BobStrategy formula) (i : Fin formula.clauses.length) :
((eventsAt formula i).filter (accepts formula alice bob)).length =
acceptedSlots (clauseAt formula i) (alice i) (honestAnswer (clauseAt formula i) bob) := by
by_cases hs : localSatisfies (clauseAt formula i) (alice i) = true
· by_cases h₁ : (alice i).first = bob (clauseAt formula i)[0].variableIndex <;>
by_cases h₂ : (alice i).second = bob (clauseAt formula i)[1].variableIndex <;>
by_cases h₃ : (alice i).third = bob (clauseAt formula i)[2].variableIndex <;>
simp [eventsAt, accepts, acceptedSlots, matchingSlots, honestAnswer,
answerAt, nameAt, hs, h₁, h₂, h₃]
· simp [eventsAt, accepts, acceptedSlots, hs]
theorem accepted_enumerateEvents (formula : Formula) (alice : AliceStrategy formula)
(bob : BobStrategy formula) (indices : List (Fin formula.clauses.length)) :
((enumerateEvents formula indices).filter (accepts formula alice bob)).length =
acceptedCount formula alice bob indices := by
induction indices with
| nil => simp [enumerateEvents, acceptedCount]
| cons i rest ih =>
simp only [enumerateEvents, List.filter_append, List.length_append,
accepted_eventsAt, ih, acceptedCount]
def allEvents (formula : Formula) : List (RandomEvent formula) :=
enumerateEvents formula (allIndices formula)
theorem length_allEvents (formula : Formula) :
(allEvents formula).length = 3 * formula.clauses.length := by
simp [allEvents, length_enumerateEvents, allIndices]
theorem allEvents_nonempty (formula : Formula) (hne : formula.clauses ≠ []) :
allEvents formula ≠ [] := by
intro he
have hl := length_allEvents formula
rw [he] at hl
have hpos : 0 < formula.clauses.length := List.length_pos_iff.mpr hne
simp only [List.length_nil] at hl
omega
theorem verifier_event_soundness (formula : Formula) (a b : Nat)
(sourceGap : ∀ bob : BobStrategy formula,
a * formula.clauses.length ≤ b * failureCount formula bob (allIndices formula))
(alice : AliceStrategy formula) (bob : BobStrategy formula) :
b * ((allEvents formula).filter (accepts formula alice bob)).length +
a * formula.clauses.length ≤ b * (allEvents formula).length := by
rw [length_allEvents]
simp only [allEvents, accepted_enumerateEvents]
exact hastad_basic_verifier_soundness formula a b sourceGap alice bob
def occurrencesAt {n : Nat} (clause : Clause n) (v : Fin n) : Nat :=
(if clause[0].variableIndex = v then 1 else 0) +
(if clause[1].variableIndex = v then 1 else 0) +
(if clause[2].variableIndex = v then 1 else 0)
def occurrenceCount (formula : Formula) (v : Fin formula.«variables») :
List (Fin formula.clauses.length) → Nat
| [] => 0
| i :: rest => occurrencesAt (clauseAt formula i) v + occurrenceCount formula v rest
theorem variable_eventsAt (formula : Formula) (v : Fin formula.«variables»)
(i : Fin formula.clauses.length) :
((eventsAt formula i).filter (fun event =>
decide (nameAt (clauseAt formula event.1) event.2 = v))).length =
occurrencesAt (clauseAt formula i) v := by
by_cases h₁ : (clauseAt formula i)[0].variableIndex = v <;>
by_cases h₂ : (clauseAt formula i)[1].variableIndex = v <;>
by_cases h₃ : (clauseAt formula i)[2].variableIndex = v <;>
simp [eventsAt, nameAt, occurrencesAt, h₁, h₂, h₃]
theorem variable_enumerateEvents (formula : Formula) (v : Fin formula.«variables»)
(indices : List (Fin formula.clauses.length)) :
((enumerateEvents formula indices).filter (fun event =>
decide (nameAt (clauseAt formula event.1) event.2 = v))).length =
occurrenceCount formula v indices := by
induction indices with
| nil => simp [enumerateEvents, occurrenceCount]
| cons i rest ih =>
simp only [enumerateEvents, List.filter_append, List.length_append,
variable_eventsAt, ih, occurrenceCount]
theorem regular_bob_marginal (formula : Formula) (degree : Nat)
(regular : ∀ v : Fin formula.«variables»,
occurrenceCount formula v (allIndices formula) = degree)
(v : Fin formula.«variables») :
((allEvents formula).filter (fun event =>
decide (nameAt (clauseAt formula event.1) event.2 = v))).length = degree := by
rw [allEvents, variable_enumerateEvents]
exact regular v
end MinUncutGames.Foundations.PCP
end
section
namespace MinUncutGames.Foundations.Hastad.SourceContexts
open Target PCP
def clauseAnswerEquiv : ClauseAnswer ≃ Bool × Bool × Bool where
toFun a := (a.first, a.second, a.third)
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2.1, a.2.2⟩
left_inv a := by cases a; rfl
right_inv a := by rcases a with ⟨a, b, c⟩; rfl
def clauseAnswerFinEquiv : ClauseAnswer ≃ Fin 8 :=
clauseAnswerEquiv.trans
((Equiv.prodCongr finTwoEquiv.symm
(Equiv.prodCongr finTwoEquiv.symm finTwoEquiv.symm)).trans
((Equiv.prodCongr (Equiv.refl (Fin 2)) finProdFinEquiv).trans finProdFinEquiv))
instance clauseAnswerFintype : Fintype ClauseAnswer :=
Fintype.ofEquiv (Bool × Bool × Bool) clauseAnswerEquiv.symm
instance clauseAnswerInhabited : Inhabited ClauseAnswer := ⟨⟨false, false, false⟩⟩
instance slotFintype : Fintype Slot where
elems := {.first, .second, .third}
complete s := by cases s <;> simp
instance slotInhabited : Inhabited Slot := ⟨.first⟩
@[simp] theorem card_clauseAnswer : Fintype.card ClauseAnswer = 8 := by
rw [Fintype.card_congr clauseAnswerFinEquiv]
rfl
@[simp] theorem card_slot : Fintype.card Slot = 3 := by decide
abbrev I (u : ℕ) := Fin u → Bool
abbrev J (u : ℕ) := Fin u → ClauseAnswer
abbrev ClauseContext (F : Formula) (u : ℕ) := Fin u → Fin F.clauses.length
abbrev VariableContext (F : Formula) (u : ℕ) := Fin u → Fin F.«variables»
abbrev SlotContext (u : ℕ) := Fin u → Slot
@[simp] theorem card_I (u : ℕ) : Fintype.card (I u) = 2 ^ u := by simp [I]
@[simp] theorem card_J (u : ℕ) : Fintype.card (J u) = 8 ^ u := by simp [J]
@[simp] theorem card_ClauseContext (F : Formula) (u : ℕ) :
Fintype.card (ClauseContext F u) = F.clauses.length ^ u := by simp [ClauseContext]
@[simp] theorem card_VariableContext (F : Formula) (u : ℕ) :
Fintype.card (VariableContext F u) = F.«variables» ^ u := by simp [VariableContext]
@[simp] theorem card_SlotContext (u : ℕ) :
Fintype.card (SlotContext u) = 3 ^ u := by simp [SlotContext]
def localConsistent {n : ℕ} (clause : Clause n) (answer : ClauseAnswer) : Bool :=
decide (∀ s s' : Slot, nameAt clause s = nameAt clause s' →
answerAt answer s = answerAt answer s')
@[simp] theorem localConsistent_eq_true_iff {n : ℕ}
(clause : Clause n) (answer : ClauseAnswer) :
localConsistent clause answer = true ↔
∀ s s' : Slot, nameAt clause s = nameAt clause s' →
answerAt answer s = answerAt answer s' := by
simp [localConsistent]
def validJ (F : Formula) {u : ℕ} (c : ClauseContext F u) (j : J u) : Bool :=
decide ((∀ t, localSatisfies (clauseAt F (c t)) (j t) = true) ∧
∀ t t' s s', nameAt (clauseAt F (c t)) s = nameAt (clauseAt F (c t')) s' →
answerAt (j t) s = answerAt (j t') s')
@[simp] theorem validJ_eq_true_iff (F : Formula) {u : ℕ}
(c : ClauseContext F u) (j : J u) :
validJ F c j = true ↔
(∀ t, localSatisfies (clauseAt F (c t)) (j t) = true) ∧
∀ t t' s s', nameAt (clauseAt F (c t)) s = nameAt (clauseAt F (c t')) s' →
answerAt (j t) s = answerAt (j t') s' := by
simp [validJ]
theorem validJ_satisfies (F : Formula) {u : ℕ} (c : ClauseContext F u)
(j : J u) (hj : validJ F c j = true) (t : Fin u) :
localSatisfies (clauseAt F (c t)) (j t) = true :=
((validJ_eq_true_iff F c j).mp hj).1 t
theorem validJ_consistent (F : Formula) {u : ℕ} (c : ClauseContext F u)
(j : J u) (hj : validJ F c j = true) (t : Fin u) (s : Slot)
(t' : Fin u) (s' : Slot)
(hname : nameAt (clauseAt F (c t)) s = nameAt (clauseAt F (c t')) s') :
answerAt (j t) s = answerAt (j t') s' :=
((validJ_eq_true_iff F c j).mp hj).2 t t' s s' hname
theorem validJ_localConsistent (F : Formula) {u : ℕ} (c : ClauseContext F u)
(j : J u) (hj : validJ F c j = true) (t : Fin u) :
localConsistent (clauseAt F (c t)) (j t) = true := by
apply (localConsistent_eq_true_iff _ _).mpr
intro s s' hs
exact validJ_consistent F c j hj t s t s' hs
def canonicalSlot {n : ℕ} (clause : Clause n) (v : Fin n) : Slot :=
if nameAt clause .first = v then .first
else if nameAt clause .second = v then .second else .third
theorem canonicalSlot_name {n : ℕ} (clause : Clause n) (v : Fin n)
(hv : ∃ s, nameAt clause s = v) : nameAt clause (canonicalSlot clause v) = v := by
by_cases hfirst : nameAt clause .first = v
· simp [canonicalSlot, hfirst]
by_cases hsecond : nameAt clause .second = v
· simp [canonicalSlot, hfirst, hsecond]
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := hv
cases s with
| first => exact False.elim (hfirst hs)
| second => exact False.elim (hsecond hs)
| third => simpa [canonicalSlot, hfirst, hsecond] using hs
def pi (F : Formula) {u : ℕ} (c : ClauseContext F u) (v : VariableContext F u)
(j : J u) : I u :=
fun t => answerAt (j t) (canonicalSlot (clauseAt F (c t)) (v t))
def sampledVariables (F : Formula) {u : ℕ} (c : ClauseContext F u)
(s : SlotContext u) : VariableContext F u :=
fun t => nameAt (clauseAt F (c t)) (s t)
theorem sampledVariables_supported (F : Formula) {u : ℕ}
(c : ClauseContext F u) (s : SlotContext u) :
∀ t, ∃ slot, nameAt (clauseAt F (c t)) slot = sampledVariables F c s t :=
fun t => ⟨s t, rfl⟩
theorem sampled_eq_pi (F : Formula) {u : ℕ} (c : ClauseContext F u)
(v : VariableContext F u) (j : J u) (hj : validJ F c j = true)
(t : Fin u) (s : Slot) (hs : nameAt (clauseAt F (c t)) s = v t) :
answerAt (j t) s = pi F c v j t := by
exact validJ_consistent F c j hj t s t
(canonicalSlot (clauseAt F (c t)) (v t))
(hs.trans (canonicalSlot_name _ _ ⟨s, hs⟩).symm)
theorem sampled_answers_eq_of_visible_eq (F : Formula) {u : ℕ}
(c : ClauseContext F u) (s s' : SlotContext u) (j : J u)
(hj : validJ F c j = true)
(hvisible : sampledVariables F c s = sampledVariables F c s') :
(fun t => answerAt (j t) (s t)) = fun t => answerAt (j t) (s' t) := by
funext t
exact validJ_consistent F c j hj t (s t) t (s' t) (congrFun hvisible t)
def honestJ (F : Formula) {u : ℕ} (c : ClauseContext F u)
(assignment : Fin F.«variables» → Bool) : J u :=
fun t => honestAnswer (clauseAt F (c t)) assignment
def honestI (F : Formula) {u : ℕ} (v : VariableContext F u)
(assignment : Fin F.«variables» → Bool) : I u :=
fun t => assignment (v t)
theorem honestJ_valid (F : Formula) {u : ℕ} (c : ClauseContext F u)
(assignment : Fin F.«variables» → Bool)
(hs : ∀ clause ∈ F.clauses, clause.eval assignment = true) :
validJ F c (honestJ F c assignment) = true := by
apply (validJ_eq_true_iff F c _).mpr
constructor
· intro t
exact (honest_satisfies _ assignment).trans (hs _ (List.getElem_mem _))
· intro t t' s s' hname
simp only [honestJ, honest_answerAt]
exact congrArg assignment hname
theorem pi_honest (F : Formula) {u : ℕ} (c : ClauseContext F u)
(v : VariableContext F u) (assignment : Fin F.«variables» → Bool)
(hsupport : ∀ t, ∃ s, nameAt (clauseAt F (c t)) s = v t) :
pi F c v (honestJ F c assignment) = honestI F v assignment := by
funext t
exact (honest_answerAt _ assignment _).trans
(congrArg assignment (canonicalSlot_name _ _ (hsupport t)))
theorem pi_honest_sampled (F : Formula) {u : ℕ} (c : ClauseContext F u)
(s : SlotContext u) (assignment : Fin F.«variables» → Bool) :
pi F c (sampledVariables F c s) (honestJ F c assignment) =
honestI F (sampledVariables F c s) assignment :=
pi_honest F c _ assignment (sampledVariables_supported F c s)
def baseAccepts (F : Formula) (v : Fin F.«variables») (c : Fin F.clauses.length)
(i : Bool) (j : ClauseAnswer) : Bool :=
decide (localSatisfies (clauseAt F c) j = true ∧
localConsistent (clauseAt F c) j = true ∧
answerAt j (canonicalSlot (clauseAt F c) v) = i)
@[simp] theorem baseAccepts_eq_true_iff (F : Formula) (v : Fin F.«variables»)
(c : Fin F.clauses.length) (i : Bool) (j : ClauseAnswer) :
baseAccepts F v c i j = true ↔
localSatisfies (clauseAt F c) j = true ∧
localConsistent (clauseAt F c) j = true ∧
answerAt j (canonicalSlot (clauseAt F c) v) = i := by
simp [baseAccepts]
theorem projection_implies_coordinate_accepts (F : Formula) {u : ℕ}
(c : ClauseContext F u) (v : VariableContext F u) (i : I u) (j : J u)
(hj : validJ F c j = true) (hpi : pi F c v j = i) (t : Fin u) :
baseAccepts F (v t) (c t) (i t) (j t) = true := by
exact (baseAccepts_eq_true_iff F _ _ _ _).mpr
⟨validJ_satisfies F c j hj t, validJ_localConsistent F c j hj t, congrFun hpi t⟩
theorem baseAccepts_implies_sampled (F : Formula) (c : Fin F.clauses.length)
(s : Slot) (i : Bool) (j : ClauseAnswer)
(h : baseAccepts F (nameAt (clauseAt F c) s) c i j = true) :
(localSatisfies (clauseAt F c) j && decide (answerAt j s = i)) = true := by
obtain ⟨hsat, hcons, heq⟩ := (baseAccepts_eq_true_iff F _ _ _ _).mp h
have hname := canonicalSlot_name (clauseAt F c) (nameAt (clauseAt F c) s) ⟨s, rfl⟩
have hans := (localConsistent_eq_true_iff _ _).mp hcons s
(canonicalSlot (clauseAt F c) (nameAt (clauseAt F c) s)) hname.symm
simp [hsat, hans.trans heq]
theorem projection_implies_sampled_accepts (F : Formula) {u : ℕ}
(c : ClauseContext F u) (s : SlotContext u) (i : I u) (j : J u)
(hj : validJ F c j = true) (hpi : pi F c (sampledVariables F c s) j = i) :
∀ t, (localSatisfies (clauseAt F (c t)) (j t) &&
decide (answerAt (j t) (s t) = i t)) = true := by
intro t
exact baseAccepts_implies_sampled F (c t) (s t) (i t) (j t)
(projection_implies_coordinate_accepts F c _ i j hj hpi t)
end MinUncutGames.Foundations.Hastad.SourceContexts
end
end OAI