Question mark \\?\n%% Commercial at \\@ Left bracket \\[ Backslash \\\\\n%% Right bracket \\] Circumflex \\^ Underscore \\_\n%% Grave accent \\` Left brace \\{ Vertical bar \\|\n%% Right brace \\} Tilde \\~}\n%%\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1995/12/01]\n\\ProvidesClass{llncs}[2024/01/29 v2.24\n^^J LaTeX document class for Lecture Notes in Computer Science]\n% Options\n\\let\\if@envcntreset\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{envcountreset}{\\let\\if@envcntreset\\iftrue}\n\\DeclareOption{citeauthoryear}{\\let\\citeauthoryear=Y}\n\\DeclareOption{oribibl}{\\let\\oribibl=Y}\n\\let\\if@custvec\\iftrue\n\\DeclareOption{orivec}{\\let\\if@custvec\\iffalse}\n\\let\\if@envcntsame\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{envcountsame}{\\let\\if@envcntsame\\iftrue}\n\\let\\if@envcntsect\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{envcountsect}{\\let\\if@envcntsect\\iftrue}\n\\let\\if@runhead\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{runningheads}{\\let\\if@runhead\\iftrue}\n\n\\let\\if@openright\\iftrue\n\\let\\if@openbib\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{openbib}{\\let\\if@openbib\\iftrue}\n\n% languages\n\\let\\switcht@@therlang\\relax\n\\def\\ds@deutsch{\\def\\switcht@@therlang{\\switcht@deutsch}}\n\\def\\ds@francais{\\def\\switcht@@therlang{\\switcht@francais}}\n\n\\DeclareOption*{\\PassOptionsToClass{\\CurrentOption}{article}}\n\n\\ProcessOptions\n\n\\LoadClass[twoside]{article}\n\\RequirePackage{multicol} % needed for the list of participants, index\n\\RequirePackage{aliascnt}\n\n\\setlength{\\textwidth}{12.2cm}\n\\setlength{\\textheight}{19.3cm}\n\\renewcommand\\@pnumwidth{2em}\n\\renewcommand\\@tocrmarg{3.5em}\n%\n\\def\\@dottedtocline#1#2#3#4#5{%\n \\ifnum #1>\\c@tocdepth \\else\n \\vskip \\z@ \\@plus.2\\p@\n {\\leftskip #2\\relax \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg \\advance\\rightskip by 0pt plus 2cm\n \\parfillskip -\\rightskip \\pretolerance=10000\n \\parindent #2\\relax\\@afterindenttrue\n \\interlinepenalty\\@M\n \\leavevmode\n \\@tempdima #3\\relax\n \\advance\\leftskip \\@tempdima \\null\\nobreak\\hskip -\\leftskip\n {#4}\\nobreak\n \\leaders\\hbox{$\\m@th\n \\mkern \\@dotsep mu\\hbox{.}\\mkern \\@dotsep\n mu$}\\hfill\n \\nobreak\n \\hb@xt@\\@pnumwidth{\\hfil\\normalfont \\normalcolor #5}%\n \\par}%\n \\fi}\n%\n\\def\\switcht@albion{%\n\\def\\abstractname{Abstract.}\n\\def\\ackname{Acknowledgments.}\n\\def\\andname{and}\n\\def\\lastandname{\\unskip, and}\n\\def\\appendixname{Appendix}\n\\def\\chaptername{Chapter}\n\\def\\claimname{Claim}\n\\def\\conjecturename{Conjecture}\n\\def\\contentsname{Table of Contents}\n\\def\\corollaryname{Corollary}\n\\def\\definitionname{Definition}\n\\def\\discintname{Disclosure of Interests.}\n\\def\\examplename{Example}\n\\def\\exercisename{Exercise}\n\\def\\figurename{Fig.}\n\\def\\keywordname{{\\bf Keywords:}}\n\\def\\indexname{Index}\n\\def\\lemmaname{Lemma}\n\\def\\contriblistname{List of Contributors}\n\\def\\listfigurename{List of Figures}\n\\def\\listtablename{List of Tables}\n\\def\\mailname{{\\it Correspondence to\\/}:}\n\\def\\noteaddname{Note added in proof}\n\\def\\notename{Note}\n\\def\\partname{Part}\n\\def\\problemname{Problem}\n\\def\\proofname{Proof}\n\\def\\propertyname{Property}\n\\def\\propositionname{Proposition}\n\\def\\questionname{Question}\n\\def\\remarkname{Remark}\n\\def\\seename{see}\n\\def\\solutionname{Solution}\n\\def\\subclassname{{\\it Subject Classifications\\/}:}\n\\def\\tablename{Table}\n\\def\\theoremname{Theorem}}\n\\switcht@albion\n% Names of theorem like environments are already defined\n% but must be translated if another language is chosen\n%\n% French section\n\\def\\switcht@francais{%\\typeout{On parle francais.}%\n \\def\\abstractname{R\\'esum\\'e.}%\n \\def\\ackname{Remerciements.}%\n \\def\\andname{et}%\n \\def\\lastandname{ et}%\n \\def\\appendixname{Appendice}%\n \\def\\chaptername{Chapitre}%\n \\def\\claimname{Pr\\'etention}%\n \\def\\conjecturename{Hypoth\\`ese}%\n \\def\\contentsname{Table des mati\\`eres}%\n \\def\\corollaryname{Corollaire}%\n \\def\\definitionname{D\\'efinition}%\n \\def\\discintname{Mention des Int\\'{e}r\\^{e}ts.}\n \\def\\examplename{Exemple}%\n \\def\\exercisename{Exercice}%\n \\def\\figurename{Fig.}%\n \\def\\keywordname{{\\bf Mots-cl\\'e:}}%\n \\def\\indexname{Index}%\n \\def\\lemmaname{Lemme}%\n \\def\\contriblistname{Liste des contributeurs}%\n \\def\\listfigurename{Liste des figures}%\n \\def\\listtablename{Liste des tables}%\n \\def\\mailname{{\\it Correspondence to\\/}:}%\n \\def\\noteaddname{Note ajout\\'ee \\`a l'\\'epreuve}%\n \\def\\notename{Remarque}%\n \\def\\partname{Partie}%\n \\def\\problemname{Probl\\`eme}%\n \\def\\proofname{Preuve}%\n \\def\\propertyname{Caract\\'eristique}%\n%\\def\\propositionname{Proposition}%\n \\def\\questionname{Question}%\n \\def\\remarkname{Remarque}%\n \\def\\seename{voir}%\n \\def\\solutionname{Solution}%\n \\def\\subclassname{{\\it Subject Classifications\\/}:}%\n \\def\\tablename{Tableau}%\n \\def\\theoremname{Th\\'eor\\`eme}%\n}\n%\n% German section\n\\def\\switcht@deutsch{%\\typeout{Man spricht deutsch.}%\n \\def\\abstractname{Zusammenfassung.}%\n \\def\\ackname{Danksagung.}%\n \\def\\andname{und}%\n \\def\\lastandname{ und}%\n \\def\\appendixname{Anhang}%\n \\def\\chaptername{Kapitel}%\n \\def\\claimname{Behauptung}%\n \\def\\conjecturename{Hypothese}%\n \\def\\contentsname{Inhaltsverzeichnis}%\n \\def\\corollaryname{Korollar}%\n%\\def\\definitionname{Definition}%\n \\def\\discintname{Offenlegung von Interessen.}\n \\def\\examplename{Beispiel}%\n \\def\\exercisename{\\\"Ubung}%\n \\def\\figurename{Abb.}%\n \\def\\keywordname{{\\bf Schl\\\"usselw\\\"orter:}}%\n \\def\\indexname{Index}%\n%\\def\\lemmaname{Lemma}%\n \\def\\contriblistname{Mitarbeiter}%\n \\def\\listfigurename{Abbildungsverzeichnis}%\n \\def\\listtablename{Tabellenverzeichnis}%\n \\def\\mailname{{\\it Correspondence to\\/}:}%\n \\def\\noteaddname{Nachtrag}%\n \\def\\notename{Anmerkung}%\n \\def\\partname{Teil}%\n%\\def\\problemname{Problem}%\n \\def\\proofname{Beweis}%\n \\def\\propertyname{Eigenschaft}%\n%\\def\\propositionname{Proposition}%\n \\def\\questionname{Frage}%\n \\def\\remarkname{Anmerkung}%\n \\def\\seename{siehe}%\n \\def\\solutionname{L\\\"osung}%\n \\def\\subclassname{{\\it Subject Classifications\\/}:}%\n \\def\\tablename{Tabelle}%\n%\\def\\theoremname{Theorem}%\n}\n\n% Ragged bottom for the actual page\n\\def\\thisbottomragged{\\def\\@textbottom{\\vskip\\z@ plus.0001fil\n\\global\\let\\@textbottom\\relax}}\n\n\\renewcommand\\small{%\n \\@setfontsize\\small\\@ixpt{11}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 8.5\\p@ \\@plus3\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus2\\p@\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 4\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus2\\p@\n \\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\parsep 0\\p@ \\@plus1\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\topsep 8\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\itemsep0\\p@}%\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n}\n\n% Switch to small font size for the credits at the end of the paper\n% (i.e. Acknowlegments and Disclosure of Interests)\n\\newenvironment{credits}{%\n\\begingroup\\small%\n\\renewcommand\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}%\n {-12\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {-0.5em \\@plus -0.22em \\@minus -0.1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\small\\bfseries\\boldmath}}\n\\renewcommand\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}%\n {-8\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {-0.5em \\@plus -0.22em \\@minus -0.1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\small\\itshape}}%\n}{\\endgroup}\n\n\\frenchspacing\n\\widowpenalty=10000\n\\clubpenalty=10000\n\n\\setlength\\oddsidemargin {63\\p@}\n\\setlength\\evensidemargin {63\\p@}\n\\setlength\\marginparwidth {90\\p@}\n\n\\setlength\\headsep {16\\p@}\n\n\\setlength\\footnotesep{7.7\\p@}\n\\setlength\\textfloatsep{8mm\\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}\n\\setlength\\intextsep {8mm\\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\n\\setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}\n\n\\newcounter {chapter}\n\\renewcommand\\thechapter {\\@arabic\\c@chapter}\n\n\\newif\\if@mainmatter \\@mainmattertrue\n\\newcommand\\frontmatter{\\cleardoublepage\n \\@mainmatterfalse\\pagenumbering{Roman}}\n\\newcommand\\mainmatter{\\cleardoublepage\n \\@mainmattertrue\\pagenumbering{arabic}}\n\\newcommand\\backmatter{\\if@openright\\cleardoublepage\\else\\clearpage\\fi\n \\@mainmatterfalse}\n\n\\renewcommand\\part{\\cleardoublepage\n \\thispagestyle{empty}%\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\onecolumn\n \\@tempswatrue\n \\else\n \\@tempswafalse\n \\fi\n \\null\\vfil\n \\secdef\\@part\\@spart}\n\n\\def\\@part[#1]#2{%\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >-2\\relax\n \\refstepcounter{part}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{part}{\\thepart\\hspace{1em}#1}%\n \\else\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{part}{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\markboth{}{}%\n {\\centering\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M\n \\normalfont\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >-2\\relax\n \\huge\\bfseries \\partname~\\thepart\n \\par\n \\vskip 20\\p@\n \\fi\n \\Huge \\bfseries #2\\par}%\n \\@endpart}\n\\def\\@spart#1{%\n {\\centering\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M\n \\normalfont\n \\Huge \\bfseries #1\\par}%\n \\@endpart}\n\\def\\@endpart{\\vfil\\newpage\n \\if@twoside\n \\null\n \\thispagestyle{empty}%\n \\newpage\n \\fi\n \\if@tempswa\n \\twocolumn\n \\fi}\n\n\\newcommand\\chapter{\\clearpage\n \\thispagestyle{empty}%\n \\global\\@topnum\\z@\n \\@afterindentfalse\n \\secdef\\@chapter\\@schapter}\n\\def\\@chapter[#1]#2{\\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\m@ne\n \\if@mainmatter\n \\refstepcounter{chapter}%\n \\typeout{\\@chapapp\\space\\thechapter.}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}%\n {\\protect\\numberline{\\thechapter}#1}%\n \\else\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\chaptermark{#1}%\n \\addtocontents{lof}{\\protect\\addvspace{10\\p@}}%\n \\addtocontents{lot}{\\protect\\addvspace{10\\p@}}%\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@topnewpage[\\@makechapterhead{#2}]%\n \\else\n \\@makechapterhead{#2}%\n \\@afterheading\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@makechapterhead#1{%\n% \\vspace*{50\\p@}%\n {\\centering\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\m@ne\n \\if@mainmatter\n \\large\\bfseries \\@chapapp{} \\thechapter\n \\par\\nobreak\n \\vskip 20\\p@\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\interlinepenalty\\@M\n \\Large \\bfseries #1\\par\\nobreak\n \\vskip 40\\p@\n }}\n\\def\\@schapter#1{\\if@twocolumn\n \\@topnewpage[\\@makeschapterhead{#1}]%\n \\else\n \\@makeschapterhead{#1}%\n \\@afterheading\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@makeschapterhead#1{%\n% \\vspace*{50\\p@}%\n {\\centering\n \\normalfont\n \\interlinepenalty\\@M\n \\Large \\bfseries #1\\par\\nobreak\n \\vskip 40\\p@\n }}\n\n\\renewcommand\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}%\n {-18\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {12\\p@ \\@plus 4\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}%\n {\\normalfont\\large\\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\rightskip=\\z@ \\@plus 8em\\pretolerance=10000 }}\n\\renewcommand\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}%\n {-18\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {8\\p@ \\@plus 4\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\rightskip=\\z@ \\@plus 8em\\pretolerance=10000 }}\n\\renewcommand\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}%\n {-18\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {-0.5em \\@plus -0.22em \\@minus -0.1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries\\boldmath}}\n\\renewcommand\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}%\n {-12\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {-0.5em \\@plus -0.22em \\@minus -0.1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}\n\\renewcommand\\subparagraph[1]{\\typeout{LLNCS warning: You should not use\n \\string\\subparagraph\\space with this class}\\vskip0.5cm\nYou should not use \\verb|\\subparagraph| with this class.\\vskip0.5cm}\n\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Gamma}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"00}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Delta}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"01}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Theta}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"02}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Lambda}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"03}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Xi}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"04}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Pi}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"05}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Sigma}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"06}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Upsilon}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"07}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Phi}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"08}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Psi}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"09}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Omega}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"0A}\n\n\\let\\footnotesize\\small\n\n\\if@custvec\n\\DeclareRobustCommand\\vec[1]{\\mathchoice{\\mbox{\\boldmath$\\displaystyle#1$}}\n{\\mbox{\\boldmath$\\textstyle#1$}}\n{\\mbox{\\boldmath$\\scriptstyle#1$}}\n{\\mbox{\\boldmath$\\scriptscriptstyle#1$}}}\n\\fi\n\n\\def\\squareforqed{\\hbox{\\rlap{$\\sqcap$}$\\sqcup$}}\n\\def\\qed{\\ifmmode\\squareforqed\\else{\\unskip\\nobreak\\hfil\n\\penalty50\\hskip1em\\null\\nobreak\\hfil\\squareforqed\n\\parfillskip=0pt\\finalhyphendemerits=0\\endgraf}\\fi}\n\n\\def\\getsto{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\n\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\gets\\cr\\to\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\gets\n\\cr\\to\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\gets\n\\cr\\to\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n\\gets\\cr\\to\\cr}}}}}\n\\def\\lid{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n<\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip0.9pt}=\\cr}}}}}\n\\def\\gid{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip0.9pt}=\\cr}}}}}\n\\def\\grole{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\n\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-1pt}<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-1pt}<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-0.8pt}<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-0.3pt}<\\cr}}}}}\n\\def\\bbbr{{\\rm I\\!R}} %reelle Zahlen\n\\def\\bbbm{{\\rm I\\!M}}\n\\def\\bbbn{{\\rm I\\!N}} %natuerliche Zahlen\n\\def\\bbbf{{\\rm I\\!F}}\n\\def\\bbbh{{\\rm I\\!H}}\n\\def\\bbbk{{\\rm I\\!K}}\n\\def\\bbbp{{\\rm I\\!P}}\n\\def\\bbbone{{\\mathchoice {\\rm 1\\mskip-4mu l} {\\rm 1\\mskip-4mu l}\n{\\rm 1\\mskip-4.5mu l} {\\rm 1\\mskip-5mu l}}}\n\\def\\bbbc{{\\mathchoice {\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\rm C$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\textstyle\\rm C$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle\\rm C$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\rm C$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}}}\n\\def\\bbbq{{\\mathchoice {\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\rm\nQ$}\\hbox{\\raise\n0.15\\ht0\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.8\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\textstyle\\rm Q$}\\hbox{\\raise\n0.15\\ht0\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.8\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle\\rm Q$}\\hbox{\\raise\n0.15\\ht0\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.7\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\rm Q$}\\hbox{\\raise\n0.15\\ht0\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.7\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}}}\n\\def\\bbbt{{\\mathchoice {\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\rm\nT$}\\hbox{\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.3\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\textstyle\\rm T$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.3\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle\\rm T$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.3\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\rm T$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.3\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}}}\n\\def\\bbbs{{\\mathchoice\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle \\rm S$}\\hbox{\\raise0.5\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.35\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.55\\wd0\\vrule height0.5\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\textstyle \\rm S$}\\hbox{\\raise0.5\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.35\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.55\\wd0\\vrule height0.5\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle \\rm S$}\\hbox{\\raise0.5\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.35\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\raise0.05\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.5\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\rm S$}\\hbox{\\raise0.5\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\raise0.05\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.55\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}}}\n\\def\\bbbz{{\\mathchoice {\\hbox{$\\mathsf\\textstyle Z\\kern-0.4em Z$}}\n{\\hbox{$\\mathsf\\textstyle Z\\kern-0.4em Z$}}\n{\\hbox{$\\mathsf\\scriptstyle Z\\kern-0.3em Z$}}\n{\\hbox{$\\mathsf\\scriptscriptstyle Z\\kern-0.2em Z$}}}}\n\n\\let\\ts\\,\n\n\\setlength\\leftmargini {17\\p@}\n\\setlength\\leftmargin {\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginii {\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiii {\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiv {\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength \\labelsep {.5em}\n\\setlength \\labelwidth{\\leftmargini}\n\\addtolength\\labelwidth{-\\labelsep}\n\n\\def\\@listI{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\parsep 0\\p@ \\@plus1\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\topsep 8\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\itemsep0\\p@}\n\\let\\@listi\\@listI\n\\@listi\n\\def\\@listii {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 0\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus\\p@}\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 0\\p@ \\@plus\\p@\\@minus\\p@\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\partopsep \\p@ \\@plus\\z@ \\@minus\\p@}\n\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemi{\\normalfont\\bfseries --}\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemii{$\\m@th\\bullet$}\n\n\\setlength\\arraycolsep{1.4\\p@}\n\\setlength\\tabcolsep{1.4\\p@}\n\n\\def\\tableofcontents{\\chapter*{\\contentsname\\@mkboth{{\\contentsname}}%\n {{\\contentsname}}}\n \\def\\authcount##1{\\setcounter{auco}{##1}\\setcounter{@auth}{1}}\n \\def\\lastand{\\ifnum\\value{auco}=2\\relax\n \\unskip{} \\andname\\\n \\else\n \\unskip \\lastandname\\\n \\fi}%\n \\def\\and{\\stepcounter{@auth}\\relax\n \\ifnum\\value{@auth}=\\value{auco}%\n \\lastand\n \\else\n \\unskip,\n \\fi}%\n \\@starttoc{toc}\\if@restonecol\\twocolumn\\fi}\n\n\\def\\l@part#1#2{\\addpenalty{\\@secpenalty}%\n \\addvspace{2em plus\\p@}% % space above part line\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@\n \\rightskip \\z@ plus 5em\n \\hrule\\vskip5pt\n \\large % same size as for a contribution heading\n \\bfseries\\boldmath % set line in boldface\n \\leavevmode % TeX command to enter horizontal mode.\n #1\\par\n \\vskip5pt\n \\hrule\n \\vskip1pt\n \\nobreak % Never break after part entry\n \\endgroup}\n\n\\def\\@dotsep{2}\n\n\\let\\phantomsection=\\relax\n\n\\def\\hyperhrefextend{\\ifx\\hyper@anchor\\@undefined\\else\n{}\\fi}\n\n\\def\\addnumcontentsmark#1#2#3{%\n\\addtocontents{#1}{\\protect\\contentsline{#2}{\\protect\\numberline\n {\\thechapter}#3}{\\thepage}\\hyperhrefextend}}%\n\\def\\addcontentsmark#1#2#3{%\n\\addtocontents{#1}{\\protect\\contentsline{#2}{#3}{\\thepage}\\hyperhrefextend}}%\n\\def\\addcontentsmarkwop#1#2#3{%\n\\addtocontents{#1}{\\protect\\contentsline{#2}{#3}{0}\\hyperhrefextend}}%\n\n\\def\\@adcmk[#1]{\\ifcase #1 \\or\n\\def\\@gtempa{\\addnumcontentsmark}%\n \\or \\def\\@gtempa{\\addcontentsmark}%\n \\or \\def\\@gtempa{\\addcontentsmarkwop}%\n \\fi\\@gtempa{toc}{chapter}%\n}\n\\def\\addtocmark{%\n\\phantomsection\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@adcmk}{\\@adcmk[3]}%\n}\n\n\\def\\l@chapter#1#2{\\addpenalty{-\\@highpenalty}\n \\vskip 1.0em plus 1pt \\@tempdima 1.5em \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@ \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg\n \\advance\\rightskip by 0pt plus 2cm\n \\parfillskip -\\rightskip \\pretolerance=10000\n \\leavevmode \\advance\\leftskip\\@tempdima \\hskip -\\leftskip\n {\\large\\bfseries\\boldmath#1}\\ifx0#2\\hfil\\null\n \\else\n \\nobreak\n \\leaders\\hbox{$\\m@th \\mkern \\@dotsep mu.\\mkern\n \\@dotsep mu$}\\hfill\n \\nobreak\\hbox to\\@pnumwidth{\\hss #2}%\n \\fi\\par\n \\penalty\\@highpenalty \\endgroup}\n\n\\def\\l@title#1#2{\\addpenalty{-\\@highpenalty}\n \\addvspace{8pt plus 1pt}\n \\@tempdima \\z@\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@ \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg\n \\advance\\rightskip by 0pt plus 2cm\n \\parfillskip -\\rightskip \\pretolerance=10000\n \\leavevmode \\advance\\leftskip\\@tempdima \\hskip -\\leftskip\n #1\\nobreak\n \\leaders\\hbox{$\\m@th \\mkern \\@dotsep mu.\\mkern\n \\@dotsep mu$}\\hfill\n \\nobreak\\hbox to\\@pnumwidth{\\hss #2}\\par\n \\penalty\\@highpenalty \\endgroup}\n\n\\def\\l@author#1#2{\\addpenalty{\\@highpenalty}\n \\@tempdima=15\\p@ %\\z@\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@ \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg\n \\advance\\rightskip by 0pt plus 2cm\n \\pretolerance=10000\n \\leavevmode \\advance\\leftskip\\@tempdima %\\hskip -\\leftskip\n \\textit{#1}\\par\n \\penalty\\@highpenalty \\endgroup}\n\n\\setcounter{tocdepth}{0}\n\\newdimen\\tocchpnum\n\\newdimen\\tocsecnum\n\\newdimen\\tocsectotal\n\\newdimen\\tocsubsecnum\n\\newdimen\\tocsubsectotal\n\\newdimen\\tocsubsubsecnum\n\\newdimen\\tocsubsubsectotal\n\\newdimen\\tocparanum\n\\newdimen\\tocparatotal\n\\newdimen\\tocsubparanum\n\\tocchpnum=\\z@ % no chapter numbers\n\\tocsecnum=15\\p@ % section 88. plus 2.222pt\n\\tocsubsecnum=23\\p@ % subsection 88.8 plus 2.222pt\n\\tocsubsubsecnum=27\\p@ % subsubsection 88.8.8 plus 1.444pt\n\\tocparanum=35\\p@ % paragraph 88.8.8.8 plus 1.666pt\n\\tocsubparanum=43\\p@ % subparagraph 88.8.8.8.8 plus 1.888pt\n\\def\\calctocindent{%\n\\tocsectotal=\\tocchpnum\n\\advance\\tocsectotal by\\tocsecnum\n\\tocsubsectotal=\\tocsectotal\n\\advance\\tocsubsectotal by\\tocsubsecnum\n\\tocsubsubsectotal=\\tocsubsectotal\n\\advance\\tocsubsubsectotal by\\tocsubsubsecnum\n\\tocparatotal=\\tocsubsubsectotal\n\\advance\\tocparatotal by\\tocparanum}\n\\calctocindent\n\n\\def\\l@section{\\@dottedtocline{1}{\\tocchpnum}{\\tocsecnum}}\n\\def\\l@subsection{\\@dottedtocline{2}{\\tocsectotal}{\\tocsubsecnum}}\n\\def\\l@subsubsection{\\@dottedtocline{3}{\\tocsubsectotal}{\\tocsubsubsecnum}}\n\\def\\l@paragraph{\\@dottedtocline{4}{\\tocsubsubsectotal}{\\tocparanum}}\n\\def\\l@subparagraph{\\@dottedtocline{5}{\\tocparatotal}{\\tocsubparanum}}\n\n\\def\\listoffigures{\\@restonecolfalse\\if@twocolumn\\@restonecoltrue\\onecolumn\n \\fi\\section*{\\listfigurename\\@mkboth{{\\listfigurename}}{{\\listfigurename}}}\n \\@starttoc{lof}\\if@restonecol\\twocolumn\\fi}\n\\def\\l@figure{\\@dottedtocline{1}{0em}{1.5em}}\n\n\\def\\listoftables{\\@restonecolfalse\\if@twocolumn\\@restonecoltrue\\onecolumn\n \\fi\\section*{\\listtablename\\@mkboth{{\\listtablename}}{{\\listtablename}}}\n \\@starttoc{lot}\\if@restonecol\\twocolumn\\fi}\n\\let\\l@table\\l@figure\n\n\\renewcommand\\listoffigures{%\n \\section*{\\listfigurename\n \\@mkboth{\\listfigurename}{\\listfigurename}}%\n \\@starttoc{lof}%\n }\n\n\\renewcommand\\listoftables{%\n \\section*{\\listtablename\n \\@mkboth{\\listtablename}{\\listtablename}}%\n \\@starttoc{lot}%\n }\n\n\\ifx\\oribibl\\undefined\n\\ifx\\citeauthoryear\\undefined\n\\renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]\n {\\section*{\\refname}\n \\def\\@biblabel##1{##1.}\n \\small\n \\list{\\@biblabel{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n {\\settowidth\\labelwidth{\\@biblabel{#1}}%\n \\leftmargin\\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\labelsep\n \\if@openbib\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\bibindent\n \\itemindent -\\bibindent\n \\listparindent \\itemindent\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\fi\n \\usecounter{enumiv}%\n \\let\\p@enumiv\\@empty\n \\renewcommand\\theenumiv{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n \\if@openbib\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\par}%\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\hskip .11em \\@plus.33em \\@minus.07em}%\n \\fi\n \\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000%\n \\sfcode`\\.=\\@m}\n {\\def\\@noitemerr\n {\\@latex@warning{Empty `thebibliography' environment}}%\n \\endlist}\n\\def\\@lbibitem[#1]#2{\\item[{[#1]}\\hfill]\\if@filesw\n {\\let\\protect\\noexpand\\immediate\n \\write\\@auxout{\\string\\bibcite{#2}{#1}}}\\fi\\ignorespaces}\n\\newcount\\@tempcntc\n\\def\\@citex[#1]#2{\\if@filesw\\immediate\\write\\@auxout{\\string\\citation{#2}}\\fi\n \\@tempcnta\\z@\\@tempcntb\\m@ne\\def\\@citea{}\\@cite{\\@for\\@citeb:=#2\\do\n {\\@ifundefined\n {b@\\@citeb}{\\@citeo\\@tempcntb\\m@ne\\@citea\\def\\@citea{,}{\\bfseries\n ?}\\@warning\n {Citation `\\@citeb' on page \\thepage \\space undefined}}%\n {\\setbox\\z@\\hbox{\\global\\@tempcntc0\\csname b@\\@citeb\\endcsname\\relax}%\n \\ifnum\\@tempcntc=\\z@ \\@citeo\\@tempcntb\\m@ne\n \\@citea\\def\\@citea{,}\\hbox{\\csname b@\\@citeb\\endcsname}%\n \\else\n \\advance\\@tempcntb\\@ne\n \\ifnum\\@tempcntb=\\@tempcntc\n \\else\\advance\\@tempcntb\\m@ne\\@citeo\n \\@tempcnta\\@tempcntc\\@tempcntb\\@tempcntc\\fi\\fi}}\\@citeo}{#1}}\n\\def\\@citeo{\\ifnum\\@tempcnta>\\@tempcntb\\else\n \\@citea\\def\\@citea{,\\,\\hskip\\z@skip}%\n \\ifnum\\@tempcnta=\\@tempcntb\\the\\@tempcnta\\else\n {\\advance\\@tempcnta\\@ne\\ifnum\\@tempcnta=\\@tempcntb \\else\n \\def\\@citea{--}\\fi\n \\advance\\@tempcnta\\m@ne\\the\\@tempcnta\\@citea\\the\\@tempcntb}\\fi\\fi}\n\\else\n\\renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]\n {\\section*{\\refname}\n \\small\n \\list{}%\n {\\settowidth\\labelwidth{}%\n \\leftmargin\\parindent\n \\itemindent=-\\parindent\n \\labelsep=\\z@\n \\if@openbib\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\bibindent\n \\itemindent -\\bibindent\n \\listparindent \\itemindent\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\fi\n \\usecounter{enumiv}%\n \\let\\p@enumiv\\@empty\n \\renewcommand\\theenumiv{}}%\n \\if@openbib\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\par}%\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\hskip .11em \\@plus.33em \\@minus.07em}%\n \\fi\n \\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000%\n \\sfcode`\\.=\\@m}\n {\\def\\@noitemerr\n {\\@latex@warning{Empty `thebibliography' environment}}%\n \\endlist}\n \\def\\@cite#1{#1}%\n \\def\\@lbibitem[#1]#2{\\item[]\\if@filesw\n {\\def\\protect##1{\\string ##1\\space}\\immediate\n \\write\\@auxout{\\string\\bibcite{#2}{#1}}}\\fi\\ignorespaces}\n \\fi\n\\else\n\\@cons\\@openbib@code{\\noexpand\\small}\n\\fi\n\n\\def\\idxquad{\\hskip 10\\p@}% space that divides entry from number\n\n\\def\\@idxitem{\\par\\hangindent 10\\p@}\n\n\\def\\subitem{\\par\\setbox0=\\hbox{--\\enspace}% second order\n \\noindent\\hangindent\\wd0\\box0}% index entry\n\n\\def\\subsubitem{\\par\\setbox0=\\hbox{--\\,--\\enspace}% third\n \\noindent\\hangindent\\wd0\\box0}% order index entry\n\n\\def\\indexspace{\\par \\vskip 10\\p@ plus5\\p@ minus3\\p@\\relax}\n\n\\renewenvironment{theindex}\n {\\@mkboth{\\indexname}{\\indexname}%\n \\thispagestyle{empty}\\parindent\\z@\n \\parskip\\z@ \\@plus .3\\p@\\relax\n \\let\\item\\par\n \\def\\,{\\relax\\ifmmode\\mskip\\thinmuskip\n \\else\\hskip0.2em\\ignorespaces\\fi}%\n \\normalfont\\small\n \\begin{multicols}{2}[\\@makeschapterhead{\\indexname}]%\n }\n {\\end{multicols}}\n\n\\renewcommand\\footnoterule{%\n \\kern-3\\p@\n \\hrule\\@width 2truecm\n \\kern2.6\\p@}\n \\newdimen\\fnindent\n \\fnindent1em\n\\long\\def\\@makefntext#1{%\n \\parindent \\fnindent%\n \\leftskip \\fnindent%\n \\noindent\n \\llap{\\hb@xt@1em{\\hss\\@makefnmark\\ }}\\ignorespaces#1}\n\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{%\n \\small\n \\vskip\\abovecaptionskip\n \\sbox\\@tempboxa{{\\bfseries #1.} #2}%\n \\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize\n {\\bfseries #1.} #2\\par\n \\else\n \\global \\@minipagefalse\n \\hb@xt@\\hsize{\\hfil\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n \\fi\n \\vskip\\belowcaptionskip}\n\n\\def\\fps@figure{htbp}\n\\def\\fnum@figure{\\figurename\\thinspace\\thefigure}\n\\def \\@floatboxreset {%\n \\reset@font\n \\small\n \\@setnobreak\n \\@setminipage\n}\n\\def\\fps@table{htbp}\n\\def\\fnum@table{\\tablename~\\thetable}\n\\renewenvironment{table}\n {\\setlength\\abovecaptionskip{0\\p@}%\n \\setlength\\belowcaptionskip{10\\p@}%\n \\@float{table}}\n {\\end@float}\n\\renewenvironment{table*}\n {\\setlength\\abovecaptionskip{0\\p@}%\n \\setlength\\belowcaptionskip{10\\p@}%\n \\@dblfloat{table}}\n {\\end@dblfloat}\n\n\\long\\def\\@caption#1[#2]#3{\\par\\addcontentsline{\\csname\n ext@#1\\endcsname}{#1}{\\protect\\numberline{\\csname\n the#1\\endcsname}{\\ignorespaces #2}}\\begingroup\n \\@parboxrestore\n \\@makecaption{\\csname fnum@#1\\endcsname}{\\ignorespaces #3}\\par\n \\endgroup}\n\n% LaTeX does not provide a command to enter the authors institute\n% addresses. The \\institute command is defined here.\n\n\\newcounter{@inst}\n\\newcounter{@auth}\n\\newcounter{auco}\n\\newdimen\\instindent\n\\newbox\\authrun\n\\newtoks\\authorrunning\n\\newtoks\\tocauthor\n\\newbox\\titrun\n\\newtoks\\titlerunning\n\\newtoks\\toctitle\n\n\\def\\clearheadinfo{\\gdef\\@author{No Author Given}%\n \\gdef\\@title{No Title Given}%\n \\gdef\\@subtitle{}%\n \\gdef\\@institute{No Institute Given}%\n \\gdef\\@thanks{}%\n \\global\\titlerunning={}\\global\\authorrunning={}%\n \\global\\toctitle={}\\global\\tocauthor={}}\n\n\\def\\institute#1{\\gdef\\@institute{#1}}\n\n\\def\\institutename{\\par\n \\begingroup\n \\parskip=\\z@\n \\parindent=\\z@\n \\setcounter{@inst}{1}%\n \\def\\and{\\par\\stepcounter{@inst}%\n \\noindent$^{\\the@inst}$\\enspace\\ignorespaces}%\n \\setbox0=\\vbox{\\def\\thanks##1{}\\@institute}%\n \\ifnum\\c@@inst=1\\relax\n \\gdef\\fnnstart{0}%\n \\else\n \\xdef\\fnnstart{\\c@@inst}%\n \\setcounter{@inst}{1}%\n \\noindent$^{\\the@inst}$\\enspace\n \\fi\n \\ignorespaces\n \\@institute\\par\n \\endgroup}\n\n\\def\\@fnsymbol#1{\\ensuremath{\\ifcase#1\\or\\star\\or{\\star\\star}\\or\n {\\star\\star\\star}\\or \\dagger\\or \\ddagger\\or\n \\mathchar \"278\\or \\mathchar \"27B\\or \\|\\or **\\or \\dagger\\dagger\n \\or \\ddagger\\ddagger \\else\\@ctrerr\\fi}}\n\n\\def\\inst#1{\\unskip$^{#1}$}\n\\def\\orcidID#1{\\unskip$^{[#1]}$} % added MR 2018-03-10\n\\def\\fnmsep{\\unskip$^,$}\n\\def\\email#1{{\\tt#1}}\n\n\\AtBeginDocument{\\@ifundefined{url}{\\def\\url#1{#1}}{}%\n\\@ifpackageloaded{babel}{%\n\\@ifundefined{extrasenglish}{}{\\addto\\extrasenglish{\\switcht@albion}}%\n\\@ifundefined{extrasfrenchb}{}{\\addto\\extrasfrenchb{\\switcht@francais}}%\n\\@ifundefined{extrasgerman}{}{\\addto\\extrasgerman{\\switcht@deutsch}}%\n\\@ifundefined{extrasngerman}{}{\\addto\\extrasngerman{\\switcht@deutsch}}%\n}{\\switcht@@therlang}%\n\\providecommand{\\keywords}[1]{\\def\\and{{\\textperiodcentered} }%\n\\par\\addvspace\\baselineskip\n\\noindent\\keywordname\\enspace\\ignorespaces#1}%\n\\@ifpackageloaded{hyperref}{%\n\\def\\doi#1{\\href{https://doi.org/\\detokenize{#1}}{\\url{https://doi.org/#1}}}}{\n\\def\\doi#1{https://doi.org/\\detokenize{#1}}}\n}\n\\def\\homedir{\\~{ }}\n\n\\def\\subtitle#1{\\gdef\\@subtitle{#1}}\n\\clearheadinfo\n%\n%%% to avoid hyperref warnings\n\\providecommand*{\\toclevel@author}{999}\n%%% to make title-entry parent of section-entries\n\\providecommand*{\\toclevel@title}{0}\n%\n\\renewcommand\\maketitle{\\newpage\n\\phantomsection\n \\refstepcounter{chapter}%\n \\stepcounter{section}%\n \\setcounter{section}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{figure}{0}\n \\setcounter{table}{0}\n \\setcounter{equation}{0}\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}%\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent=\\z@\n \\renewcommand\\thefootnote{\\@fnsymbol\\c@footnote}%\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\ifnum \\col@number=\\@ne\n \\@maketitle\n \\else\n \\twocolumn[\\@maketitle]%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\newpage\n \\global\\@topnum\\z@ % Prevents figures from going at top of page.\n \\@maketitle\n \\fi\n \\thispagestyle{empty}\\@thanks\n%\n \\def\\\\{\\unskip\\ \\ignorespaces}\\def\\inst##1{\\unskip{}}%\n \\def\\thanks##1{\\unskip{}}\\def\\fnmsep{\\unskip}%\n \\instindent=\\hsize\n \\advance\\instindent by-\\headlineindent\n \\if!\\the\\toctitle!\\addcontentsline{toc}{title}{\\@title}\\else\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{title}{\\the\\toctitle}\\fi\n \\if@runhead\n \\if!\\the\\titlerunning!\\else\n \\edef\\@title{\\the\\titlerunning}%\n \\fi\n \\global\\setbox\\titrun=\\hbox{\\small\\rm\\unboldmath\\ignorespaces\\@title}%\n \\ifdim\\wd\\titrun>\\instindent\n \\typeout{Title too long for running head. Please supply}%\n \\typeout{a shorter form with \\string\\titlerunning\\space prior to\n \\string\\maketitle}%\n \\global\\setbox\\titrun=\\hbox{\\small\\rm\n Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length}%\n \\fi\n \\xdef\\@title{\\copy\\titrun}%\n \\fi\n%\n \\if!\\the\\tocauthor!\\relax\n {\\def\\and{\\noexpand\\protect\\noexpand\\and}%\n \\def\\inst##1{}% added MR 2017-09-20 to remove inst numbers from the TOC\n \\def\\orcidID##1{}% added MR 2017-09-20 to remove ORCID ids from the TOC\n \\protected@xdef\\toc@uthor{\\@author}}%\n \\else\n \\def\\\\{\\noexpand\\protect\\noexpand\\newline}%\n \\protected@xdef\\scratch{\\the\\tocauthor}%\n \\protected@xdef\\toc@uthor{\\scratch}%\n \\fi\n \\addtocontents{toc}{\\noexpand\\protect\\noexpand\\authcount{\\the\\c@auco}}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{author}{\\toc@uthor}%\n \\if@runhead\n \\if!\\the\\authorrunning!\n \\value{@inst}=\\value{@auth}%\n \\setcounter{@auth}{1}%\n \\else\n \\edef\\@author{\\the\\authorrunning}%\n \\fi\n \\global\\setbox\\authrun=\\hbox{\\def\\inst##1{}% added MR 2017-09-20 to remove inst numbers from the runninghead\n \\def\\orcidID##1{}% added MR 2017-09-20 to remove ORCID ids from the runninghead\n \\small\\unboldmath\\@author\\unskip}%\n \\ifdim\\wd\\authrun>\\instindent\n \\typeout{Names of authors too long for running head. Please supply}%\n \\typeout{a shorter form with \\string\\authorrunning\\space prior to\n \\string\\maketitle}%\n \\global\\setbox\\authrun=\\hbox{\\small\\rm\n Authors Suppressed Due to Excessive Length}%\n \\fi\n \\xdef\\@author{\\copy\\authrun}%\n \\markboth{\\@author}{\\@title}%\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\setcounter{footnote}{\\fnnstart}%\n \\clearheadinfo}\n%\n\\def\\@maketitle{\\newpage\n \\markboth{}{}%\n \\def\\lastand{\\ifnum\\value{@inst}=2\\relax\n \\unskip{} \\andname\\\n \\else\n \\unskip \\lastandname\\\n \\fi}%\n \\def\\and{\\stepcounter{@auth}\\relax\n \\ifnum\\value{@auth}=\\value{@inst}%\n \\lastand\n \\else\n \\unskip,\n \\fi}%\n \\begin{center}%\n \\let\\newline\\\\\n {\\Large \\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\pretolerance=10000\n \\@title \\par}\\vskip .8cm\n\\if!\\@subtitle!\\else {\\large \\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\vskip -.65cm\n \\pretolerance=10000\n \\@subtitle \\par}\\vskip .8cm\\fi\n \\setbox0=\\vbox{\\setcounter{@auth}{1}\\def\\and{\\stepcounter{@auth}}%\n \\def\\thanks##1{}\\@author}%\n \\global\\value{@inst}=\\value{@auth}%\n \\global\\value{auco}=\\value{@auth}%\n \\setcounter{@auth}{1}%\n{\\lineskip .5em\n\\noindent\\ignorespaces\n\\@author\\vskip.35cm}\n {\\small\\institutename}\n \\end{center}%\n }\n\n% definition of the \"\\spnewtheorem\" command.\n%\n% Usage:\n%\n% \\spnewtheorem{env_nam}{caption}[within]{cap_font}{body_font}\n% or \\spnewtheorem{env_nam}[numbered_like]{caption}{cap_font}{body_font}\n% or \\spnewtheorem*{env_nam}{caption}{cap_font}{body_font}\n%\n% New is \"cap_font\" and \"body_font\". It stands for\n% fontdefinition of the caption and the text itself.\n%\n% \"\\spnewtheorem*\" gives a theorem without number.\n%\n% A defined spnewthoerem environment is used as described\n% by Lamport.\n%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\edef\\@thmcountersep{}\n\\edef\\@thmcounterend{.}\n\n\\def\\spnewtheorem{\\@ifstar{\\@sthm}{\\@Sthm}}\n\n% definition of \\spnewtheorem with number\n\n\\def\\@spnthm#1#2{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@spxnthm{#1}{#2}}{\\@spynthm{#1}{#2}}}\n\\def\\@Sthm#1{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@spothm{#1}}{\\@spnthm{#1}}}\n\n% theorem-like environment with standard counter\n\\def\\@spynthm#1#2#3#4{\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\@definecounter{#1}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname the#1\\endcsname{\\@thmcounter{#1}}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname #1name\\endcsname{#2}%\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@spthm{#1}{\\csname #1name\\endcsname}{#3}{#4}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}\n\n% theorem-like environment with section-wise counter (envcountsect)\n\\def\\@spxnthm#1#2[#3]#4#5{\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\@definecounter{#1}\\@addtoreset{#1}{#3}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname the#1\\endcsname{\\expandafter\\noexpand\n \\csname the#3\\endcsname \\noexpand\\@thmcountersep \\@thmcounter{#1}}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname #1name\\endcsname{#2}%\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@spthm{#1}{\\csname #1name\\endcsname}{#4}{#5}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}\n\n% theorem-like environment with shared counter (envcountsame)\n\\def\\@spothm#1[#2]#3#4#5{%\n \\@ifundefined{c@#2}{\\@latexerr{No theorem environment `#2' defined}\\@eha}%\n {\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\newaliascnt{#1}{#2}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname #1name\\endcsname{#3}%\n \\if@envcntsect\n % the following line, introduced in v2.24, fixes incorrect hypertexnames\n % when envcountsect is used in combination with envcountsame\n \\@addtoreset{#1}{section}\n \\fi\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@spthm{#1}{\\csname #1name\\endcsname}{#4}{#5}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}}\n\n\n\n\\def\\@spthm#1#2#3#4{\\topsep 7\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n\\refstepcounter{#1}%\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@spythm{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}}{\\@spxthm{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}}}\n\n\\def\\@spxthm#1#2#3#4{\\@spbegintheorem{#2}{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}{#3}{#4}%\n \\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\@spythm#1#2#3#4[#5]{\\@spopargbegintheorem{#2}{\\csname\n the#1\\endcsname}{#5}{#3}{#4}\\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\@spbegintheorem#1#2#3#4{\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{#3#1\\ #2\\@thmcounterend}]#4}\n\n\\def\\@spopargbegintheorem#1#2#3#4#5{\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{#4#1\\ #2}]{#4(#3)\\@thmcounterend\\ }#5}\n\n% definition of \\spnewtheorem* without number\n\n\\def\\@sthm#1#2{\\@Ynthm{#1}{#2}}\n\n\\def\\@Ynthm#1#2#3#4{\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@Thm{\\csname #1name\\endcsname}{#3}{#4}}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname #1name\\endcsname{#2}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}\n\n\\def\\@Thm#1#2#3{\\topsep 7\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@Ythm{#1}{#2}{#3}}{\\@Xthm{#1}{#2}{#3}}}\n\n\\def\\@Xthm#1#2#3{\\@Begintheorem{#1}{#2}{#3}\\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\@Ythm#1#2#3[#4]{\\@Opargbegintheorem{#1}\n {#4}{#2}{#3}\\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\@Begintheorem#1#2#3{#3\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{#2#1\\@thmcounterend}]}\n\n\\def\\@Opargbegintheorem#1#2#3#4{#4\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{#3#1}]{#3(#2)\\@thmcounterend\\ }}\n\n\\if@envcntsect\n \\def\\@thmcountersep{.}\n \\spnewtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\else\n \\spnewtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n \\if@envcntreset\n \\@addtoreset{theorem}{section}\n \\else\n \\@addtoreset{theorem}{chapter}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n%definition of various theorem environments\n\\spnewtheorem*{claim}{Claim}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spnewtheorem*{proof}{Proof}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\if@envcntsame % alle Umgebungen wie Theorem.\n \\def\\spn@wtheorem#1#2#3#4{\\@spothm{#1}[theorem]{#2}{#3}{#4}}\n\\else % alle Umgebungen mit eigenem Zaehler\n \\if@envcntsect % mit section numeriert\n \\def\\spn@wtheorem#1#2#3#4{\\@spxnthm{#1}{#2}[section]{#3}{#4}}\n \\else % nicht mit section numeriert\n \\if@envcntreset\n \\def\\spn@wtheorem#1#2#3#4{\\@spynthm{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}\n \\@addtoreset{#1}{section}}\n \\else\n \\def\\spn@wtheorem#1#2#3#4{\\@spynthm{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}\n \\@addtoreset{#1}{chapter}}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\\spn@wtheorem{case}{Case}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{conjecture}{Conjecture}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{corollary}{Corollary}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\spn@wtheorem{definition}{Definition}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\spn@wtheorem{example}{Example}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{exercise}{Exercise}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\spn@wtheorem{note}{Note}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{problem}{Problem}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{property}{Property}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{proposition}{Proposition}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\spn@wtheorem{question}{Question}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{solution}{Solution}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{remark}{Remark}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\n\\def\\@takefromreset#1#2{%\n \\def\\@tempa{#1}%\n \\let\\@tempd\\@elt\n \\def\\@elt##1{%\n \\def\\@tempb{##1}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\\else\n \\@addtoreset{##1}{#2}%\n \\fi}%\n \\expandafter\\expandafter\\let\\expandafter\\@tempc\\csname cl@#2\\endcsname\n \\expandafter\\def\\csname cl@#2\\endcsname{}%\n \\@tempc\n \\let\\@elt\\@tempd}\n\n\\def\\theopargself{\\def\\@spopargbegintheorem##1##2##3##4##5{\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{##4##1\\ ##2}]{##4##3\\@thmcounterend\\ }##5}\n \\def\\@Opargbegintheorem##1##2##3##4{##4\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{##3##1}]{##3##2\\@thmcounterend\\ }}\n }\n\n\\renewenvironment{abstract}{%\n \\list{}{\\advance\\topsep by0.35cm\\relax\\small\n \\leftmargin=1cm\n \\labelwidth=\\z@\n \\listparindent=\\z@\n \\itemindent\\listparindent\n \\rightmargin\\leftmargin}\\item[\\hskip\\labelsep\n \\bfseries\\abstractname]}\n {\\endlist}\n\n\\newdimen\\headlineindent % dimension for space between\n\\headlineindent=1.166cm % number and text of headings.\n\n\\def\\ps@headings{\\let\\@mkboth\\@gobbletwo\n \\let\\@oddfoot\\@empty\\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n \\def\\@evenhead{\\normalfont\\small\\rlap{\\thepage}\\hspace{\\headlineindent}%\n \\leftmark\\hfil}\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\normalfont\\small\\hfil\\rightmark\\hspace{\\headlineindent}%\n \\llap{\\thepage}}\n \\def\\chaptermark##1{}%\n \\def\\sectionmark##1{}%\n \\def\\subsectionmark##1{}}\n\n\\def\\ps@titlepage{\\let\\@mkboth\\@gobbletwo\n \\let\\@oddfoot\\@empty\\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n \\def\\@evenhead{\\normalfont\\small\\rlap{\\thepage}\\hspace{\\headlineindent}%\n \\hfil}\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\normalfont\\small\\hfil\\hspace{\\headlineindent}%\n \\llap{\\thepage}}\n \\def\\chaptermark##1{}%\n \\def\\sectionmark##1{}%\n \\def\\subsectionmark##1{}}\n\n\\if@runhead\\ps@headings\\else\n\\ps@empty\\fi\n\n\\setlength\\arraycolsep{1.4\\p@}\n\\setlength\\tabcolsep{1.4\\p@}\n\n\\endinput\n%end of file llncs.cls\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[runningheads]{llncs}\n\\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\\usepackage{graphicx} % Required for inserting images\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{listings}\n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\usepackage{enumitem}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{multicol}\n\\usepackage{xurl}\n\\usepackage[htt]{hyphenat}\n\\usepackage{breakcites}\n\\usepackage{tabularx}\n\\usepackage{array}\n\n\n\\definecolor{codegreen}{rgb}{0,0.6,0}\n\\definecolor{codegray}{rgb}{0.5,0.5,0.5}\n\\definecolor{codepurple}{rgb}{0.58,0,0.82}\n\\definecolor{backcolour}{rgb}{0.95,0.95,0.92}\n\n\\newcommand{\\WHO}[1]{\\textbf{\\color{red}WHO: #1}}\n\\newcommand{\\KERN}{{\\sc**kern} }\n\\def \\ie {\\emph{i.e.}, }\n\\def \\eg {\\emph{e.g.}, }\n\\def \\etal {\\emph{et al.}}\n\\def \\wrt {\\emph{w.r.t.}}\n\\def \\etc {\\emph{etc.}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\mzk}{Moravian Library}\n\n\\newcommand{\\tit}[1]{\\smallbreak\\noindent\\textbf{#1.}}\n\n\\lstdefinelanguage{json}{\n basicstyle=\\normalfont\\ttfamily,\n numbers=left,\n numberstyle=\\scriptsize,\n stepnumber=1,\n numbersep=8pt,\n showstringspaces=false,\n breaklines=true,\n frame=lines,\n backgroundcolor=\\color{backcolour},\n literate=\n *{0}{{{\\color{black}0}}}{1}\n {1}{{{\\color{black}1}}}{1}\n {2}{{{\\color{black}2}}}{1}\n {3}{{{\\color{black}3}}}{1}\n {4}{{{\\color{black}4}}}{1}\n {5}{{{\\color{black}5}}}{1}\n {6}{{{\\color{black}6}}}{1}\n {7}{{{\\color{black}7}}}{1}\n {8}{{{\\color{black}8}}}{1}\n {9}{{{\\color{black}9}}}{1}\n {:}{{{\\color{codegreen}{:}}}}{1}\n {,}{{{\\color{codegreen}{,}}}}{1}\n {\\{}{{{\\color{black}{\\{}}}}{1}\n {\\}}{{{\\color{black}{\\}}}}}{1}\n {[}{{{\\color{black}{[}}}}{1}\n {]}{{{\\color{black}{]}}}}{1},\n}\n\n\\lstdefinestyle{mystyle}{\n backgroundcolor=\\color{backcolour},\n commentstyle=\\color{codegreen},\n keywordstyle=\\color{magenta},\n numberstyle=\\tiny\\color{codegray},\n stringstyle=\\color{codepurple},\n basicstyle=\\ttfamily\\footnotesize,\n breakatwhitespace=false,\n breaklines=true,\n captionpos=b,\n keepspaces=true,\n numbers=left,\n numbersep=5pt,\n showspaces=false,\n showstringspaces=false,\n showtabs=false,\n tabsize=2\n}\n\n\\lstset{style=mystyle}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\\title{DEMUN: Fast and accurate discovery \\\\ of music notation in very large collections}\n\\titlerunning{DEMUN}\n\\authorrunning{Dvo\\v{r}\\'{a}k, B\\'{i}m \\etal}\n%\\author{Pau*, Jirka*, Carles, Martina, Marketa, Gerard, Vojta, Samuel, Jan, Alicia}\n\n\\author{Vojt\\v{e}ch Dvo\\v{r}\\'{a}k\\inst{1} \\and Filip B\\'{i}m\\inst{2} \\and Ji\\v{r}\\'{i} Mayer\\inst{1} \\and Martina Dvo\\v{r}\\'{a}kov\\'{a}\\inst{2} \\and Mark\\'{e}ta Herzanov\\'{a} Vlkov\\'{a}\\inst{2} \\and Pavel Pecina\\inst{1} \\and Petr \\v{Z}abi\\v{c}ka\\inst{2} \\and Jan~Haji\\v{c} jr.\\inst{1}}\n%\\authorrunning{P. Torras et al.}\n% First names are abbreviated in the running head.\n% If there are more than two authors, 'et al.' is used.\n%\n\\institute{Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics, Charles University, Prague, Czechia \\\\ \\email{\\{dvorak,hajicj\\}@ufal.mff.cuni.cz}\n\\and Moravian Library, Brno, Czechia%, \\email{xxx} \n}\n\n\\date{May 2026}\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\n\\begin{abstract}\n Much of written musical heritage is preserved and digitised at memory institutions: libraries, museums, and archives. Owing to their collection structures, sheet music tends to be concentrated in large subsets that are defined as collections of music, with corresponding metadata that makes the music findable. However, when studying musical life as opposed to individual works, relevant documents often lie outside of these specialised collections: in textbooks, newspapers, other periodicals, pamphlets, and other documents with extensive circulation. But these documents are typically not catalogued as musical documents, and though there may be a lot of such documents overall, in large library collections, they are still extremely sparse. Manual discovery is thus unfeasible. Automated discovery requires an extremely low false positive rate in order to be useful, and must also operate quickly. We present DEMUN: a two-stage lightweight detector of music notation with a false positive rate of 0.015 \\%. In the test scenario, 4 million images of a national-scale library were processed, out of which 1,500 pages with music notation were discovered, suggesting the entire collection may contain up to 20-30,000 unmarked documents of musical life.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\n\\section{Introduction}\n\nOptical Music Recognition (OMR) systems start from a document containing music notation \\cite{calvo-zaragozaUnderstandingOpticalMusic2021}, and it is the user's responsibility to feed such images to the system. However, an unknown but possibly significant portion of sheet music in archival and library collections is not marked as music notation in its metadata, so it will never be presented to an OMR system, and will remain undiscoverable. \n\nThis probably does not concern important music, in the sense that one would discover new gems of repertoire among such unmarked pages: these would likely have been parts of musical collections before the digitization process started, and therefore would have been a priori marked as sheet music. However, these documents may be spread around textbooks, songbooks, magazines, pamphlets, or newspapers, and they represent an untapped source of insight into musical life outside its formal centres (orchestras or opera houses), especially as the urban and musically literate population grew in the late 18th and throughout the 19th centuries. \n\nFurthermore, fragments of notation from earlier documents are often found as material re-used for bindings of newer books, which has the potential to entirely change perspectives on musical life in earlier periods: for example, a fragment of Notre Dame polyphony was accidentally discovered in a 14th-century book on horticulture from Prague that opens the possibility that this French repertoire was actually known and practised in the eastern reaches of the Holy Roman Empire \\cite{VlhovaWorner2022benedicamus}. A complete medieval chant book from Hungary has been reconstructed this way from fragments found in different book bindings in the library of Zagreb \\cite{szoliva2026breviariumStrigonense}.\n%\nA collection of documents with music notation discovered throughout gathering data for this work is shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:data-examples}.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\linewidth]{fig/examples-detected-small.png}\n \\caption{Examples of music notation found outside of documents with metadata marking them as sheet music.}\n \\label{fig:data-examples}\n\\end{figure}\n\nFrom the point of view of machine learning, discovering such documents is low-hanging fruit. European notations that use the staff are especially visually distinct, but other systems such as jianpu, suzipu, or jeongganbo are rather distinct as well. Document image classification with deep learning is by now an undergraduate-level exercise.\n\nThe challenge, however, is scale and sparsity. By definition, we want to discover sheet music anywhere. In the case of the Moravian Library, this means processing over 70.000.000 images. If thousands of musical documents remain to be discovered, which has the potential to significantly influence the overall picture of musical life, this is still less than 0.1 \\% of the total number of pages: the classification problem is extremely unbalanced. This means that the false positive rate (FPR) must be extremely low, otherwise results will be swamped with false positive results. Each 1 \\% of FPR at $10^7$ pages means 100.000 spurious results: 99 \\% precision is not good enough.\n\nAt the same time, even if the entire pipeline --- from sending a request to the library's image servers to producing a result --- averaged 0.1 s per image, processing the Moravian Library collection would still take 80–90 days. Much could be parallelised, but libraries typically do not have the in-house computing resources with capacity for such a task; therefore, networking introduces an additional potential bottleneck.\n\nIn this work, we present DEMUN: a real-world music notation discovery system that works at library scales. With a two-stage classification architecture that decreases networking load by two orders of magnitude, we increase the concentration of music notation in the system output from an estimated 1:2600 to 3:1, achieving a false positive rate of 0.015 \\%. The false negative rate is hard to quantify, but we estimate it at no more than 10 \\%. Additionally, we contribute the OMRA dataset for classifying music notation. The detection results indicate that more than 20.000 pages with music notation remain to be discovered; processing the entire Moravian Library~collection is ongoing.\n\n\n\\section{Related work}\n\nDocument image classification for digital libraries has long been known as an important task \\cite{Baird2003digitalLibraries}, but it has come to its own primarily with the advent of deep learning \\cite{Kang2014documentImageCNNs}; it was known to be of interest \\cite{Chen2006surveyDocumentImageClassification}, but prior to DL, production-ready results were very difficult to obtain (with the notable exception of invoice region classification by HMMs on XY-trees \\cite{diligenti2003hidden}, illustrating how domain-dependent accuracy has been). Earlier work on document classification in libraries primarily focused on classifying documents into genres based on their text, especially for scientific libraries \\cite{pong2007comparativeClassification,Caragea2016documentTypeClassification,Xu2023semanticClassifiers}, not necessarily what the pages looked like;\ncombination of OCR and image processing for document classification has since also been performed \\cite{Jain2019multimodalDocumentImage,audebert2019multimodal}.\n%\nSpeed has also been a concern: already in 2017, a throughput over 800 images per second at inference time was achieved with a pre-trained CNN \\cite{Kolsch2017realTime}, though only on a GPU and not at the production-level accuracy required by the sparsity of music notation data.\n\nIn the broader cultural heritage domain, image classification has been applied to various materials: architectural images \\cite{llamas2017classification}, archaeological photos \\cite{Bickler2021machineLearningArcheology}, artistic images \\cite{carneiro2012artistic}, or detecting rail and building objects on old maps \\cite{Hosseini2022maps}. Digitised books have been classified by print type classification \\cite{Im2021printingTechnology}. The increased focus on image data rather than texts has been termed the ``visual turn'' in the digital humanities \\cite{Wevers2019visualTurn}.\n\nWe have conspicuously left out images of music notation so far. Why? Because surprisingly little has actually been done on this task. In the context of OMR, it is left out of scope by the seminal Understanding OMR paper \\cite{calvo-zaragozaUnderstandingOpticalMusic2021} by the definition of OMR as ``reading music notation from documents'' provided there: but the document must first be supplied, which is barely mentioned. In library settings, OMR has focused more on application of OMR to known document images and subsequent retrieval \\cite{diet2018innovative,umbreit2024omr,hajic2018current,barahona2026directRetrieval}.\n\n%MUSICONN, our DLfM stuff, ... \n\nLayout analysis \\cite{gallegoStaffLineRemoval2017,dvorakStaffLayoutAnalysis2024} or object detection \\cite{pachaBaselineGeneralMusicObject2018,tuggenerDeepScoresDatasetSegmentation2018} technically could be used to reject pages that contain no staff regions or pixels, but it has not been used that way (and especially object detection systems would be a waste of computational resources).\n\n\nClassifying images by whether they contain music has been done in 2006\n\\cite{bainbridge2006identifyingMusicDocumnets} on internet images, with near-perfect recall but precision worse (slightly above 90 \\%).\nWork has been done on identifying regions of music notation in mixed documents \\cite{Pedersoli2016segmentationMusicText}, and in the context of medieval notation, fragment discovery has been mentioned as motivation for devleoping a neume script classifier \\cite{Bouressa2025pixelsPaleography}.\n\nPerhaps closest to our work are image classification experiments recently performed at the National Library of Norway that included music notation \\cite{roald2024visual}, achieving 99 \\% recall and 96 \\% precision on the music notation category --- almost good enough, though because of the more general-purpose image retrieval setting, it relied on VIT, CLIP and SigLIP features that are much slower to extract. Similar work has also been done in the Moravian Library \\cite{Lehecka2024orbis}, though no experimental results have been reported yet.\n\nOverall, despite being low-hanging fruit from the point of view of machine learning (or perhaps because of it), music notation discovery has received little attention so far. \n% uhhh\n\n\\section{Design constraints and two-stage architecture}\n\nAs indicated above, notation discovery at library scales must operate under two main concerns: speed, and a low enough false positive rate (FPR) so that the results are not cluttered to the point of uselessness. False negative rate (FNR) is a secondary concern, at least as long as it doesn't reach 50 \\% or more: any discovery with sufficiently low FPR that discovers some notation is better than having no such system at all. (This is fortunate, because FNR is also much harder to estimate.)\n\nWe take a literal mining view of the system: treating the library collection as low-grade music notation ore, we are trying to increase the concentration of music notation at the output end of the discovery process to a useful level. A reasonable minimum to make this output useful to library users (especially musicologists) should be a 1:1 mix of notation and non-notation pages, or 50 \\% concentration: at approximately this concentration, manual quality control of the output become worth doing.\n\nWe do not know the grade of the ``ore'' --- the percentage of pages in the Moravian Library~non-music collection that contain undiscovered music notation. However, it can be reasonably assumed that this is not greater than 0.1 \\%. (In fact, this would be lot of undiscovered music: 1 in 1000 pages, or about 70.000 pages with music notation in the Moravian Library~collections!) In order to reach a 50 \\% concentration, the maximum allowable FPR is then 0.1 \\% (precision 99.9 \\%). If the grade is lower, this requirement becomes correspondingly stricter.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\linewidth]{fig/demun-architecture-updated.png}\n \\caption{DEMUN system architecture and its distribution across library servers and remote OMR service servers.}\n \\label{fig:architecture}\n\\end{figure}\n\nAt the same time, this must be done fast. The library does not have the computing infrastructure (neither GPUs, nor a large enough CPU cluster with spare capacity) to run sufficiently accurate models locally. At the same time, networking becomes a concern for off-site computing. At approx. 3 MB per image (reasonable-quality JPEG exports), 210 TB of data would have to be transferred. At ~1 Gbps (the relevant network speed of the trunk to which the Moravian Library~is connected), this is 20 days of just transferring the data (and of course the full capacity of the network would not be available).\n\nTaking further inspiration from mining, this combination of requirements led us to design the discovery system as a two-stage process: on-site pre-filtering to increase the concentration of sheet music in the output with limited computing resources, and then sending this more concentrated material to the more accurate main stage that requires more computing resources per processed image. The pre-filter stage can be parallelised on-site, before the networking bottleneck: if the pre-filter improves concentration to approx. 1 \\%, networking requirements go down by (likely) an order of magnitude or more and the system becomes practical. There will be some waste (false negatives on the pre-filter), but as stated above, this is a secondary concern: detecting some music is better than none.\n\nIdeally, the discovery system would also classify the main expected notation types (CWMN, mensural, and diastematic chant), because each would then be sent to a different OMR model for processing. This is best done in the more accurate second stage, either in a separate step, or jointly with the negative class.\n\nTaken together, we propose the following system architecture (shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:architecture}):\n\n\\begin{itemize}[noitemsep]\n \\item \\textbf{Pre-filter} (stage 1): to be deployed on the library side, not subject to as stringent accuracy requirements, lightweight, cannot require GPU, can be parallelised.\n \\item \\textbf{Main stage} (stage 2): deployed remotely, very stringent FPR requirements, GPU available. \\textbf{Two-step} setting with a binary notation/non-notation step (BiC) and then a separate classifier into modern/chant/mensural notations (MCM). Alternately, a \\textbf{Single-pass} (SiPa) setting with a four-way classifier: nothing-CWMN-mensural-chant.\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\n\\section{Models}\n\n\\textbf{Pre-filter.} To minimise the computing requirements, the pre-filter is an EfficientNet \\cite{tan2019efficientnet}, initialised with pre-trained weights of the EfficientNet b0 model.\n\n\\textbf{Main stage.} For the main stage, we use the YOLO11 model \\cite{yolo11ultralytics} in the classification regime, initialised with the \\texttt{yolo11n-cls.pt} pre-trained weights.\nIn the two-step setting, we train a binary notation/non-notation classifier (BiC), and a separate three-way Mensural-Chant-Modern (MCM) notation type classifier. Given that we care most about FPR, we add the ``nothing'' class also to this step, to have another chance to filter out non-notation images that get to this stage. In the single-pass setting (SiPa), we simply train a four-way YOLO11 classifier for nothing, CWMN, mensural, and chant notation as the output classes.\n\n\\section{Data: bootstrapping from scratch}\n\nThere is no large-scale document classification dataset with music notation images, especially not music notation in non-traditional contexts such as those where we are trying to discover this music. We must build such a dataset first.\n\nWe bootstrap this process by taking advantage of a small balanced proprietary dataset from the Orbis Pictus project of the Moravian Library~for page image classification that includes music notation as one of the categories, together with text, images, maps, tables, and other graphics. This dataset contains only a few hundred examples of the music notation class. We fine-tune the pre-filter EfficientNet b0 on this data.\n\nNext, we run the pre-filter on the Moravian Library~collection until it marks 100.000 images as containing music notation. This was achieved after processing approx. 4.000.000 images. \n\nWe then built a simple annotation interface for binary decisions and had these 100.000 manually annotated for whether they in fact contain music notation or not. Four annotators were able to complete this task in less than two weeks. 1.611 pages had to be discarded from the data because their licencing did not allow sending them over to the remote computing site to process, leaving a total of 98.389 images. Out of these, 1.507 were found to in fact contain music notation.%\\footnote{Due to licencing restrictions for certain images, the dataset unfortunately cannot be released as a whole.}\n\n\\section{Pre-filter results and ``ore grade'' estimate}\n\nThis allows us to finally measure some results. With 4.000.000 images processed, approx. 100.000 tagged as positive, and approx. 1.500 of these in fact positive, the FPR of the pre-filter is approx. 2,5 \\%. (Now it should be clear why the FNR is much harder to compute: one would have to manually annotate all 4.000.000 images to find how many were in fact left out. However, this data will enable us to estimate FNR at least for the main stage.) The concentration of sheet music in the pre-filter output is approx. 1.5 \\%. \n\nThis concentration is much higher than grade of the ``ore'': out of 4.000.000 processed pages, only 1.500 contained music notation, leading to an effective grade of 0.0375 \\%. (We say ``effective grade'' recoverable by the pre-filter because the true grade may be higher by all false negative classifications the pre-filter may have made.) With a 1.5 \\% output concentration, this is a $40\\times$ improvement.\n\nIf these results are extrapolated to the scale of the entire Moravian Library, the pre-filter will send more than 25.000 pages containing sheet music to the main stage (with approx.~1.700.000 pages that it tags as false positive that the main stage must correctly discard). This would already be a significant amount of data on musical life added to the pool of musicological sources.\n\n\\textbf{Estimating false negatives.}\n%Je recall alespoň 0,98? Toto nejde změřit přímo, protože bychom museli ručně procházet 3,9 M stránek, které předfiltr označil jako negativní. Přetrénovali jsme nicméně stejnou architekturu s jinou náhodnou inicializací (seed) a otestovali ji alespoň na 100.000 anotovaných stránkách, abychom získali alespoň částečný odhad recallu. Ukázalo se, že recall je 0,98 až 0,99 (v závislosti na použité páteři EfficientNet – varianta B0 vs. pomalejší a přesnější B4). \n%\nWe can at least estimate the non-systematic component of FNR by re-running the pre-filter fine-tuning with a different random seed, and then evalauted how many of the 1.507 true positive images from the bootstrapped 100.000-image annotated set were missed by the re-finetuned model. Across multiple model runs, this was 1-2 \\%. % (with the b4 variant of the EfficientNet being more stable but slower). \n\nThis is a lower bound on FNR because it cannot include the images that all models would systematically miss because of issues such as insufficient coverage of the seed dataset. \nHowever, according to expert knowledge of the collections in the Moravian Library, there certainly isn't an order of magnitude more music than the estimated 0.0375 \\% (approx. 1 in 2.600 pages).\n\n%Pokud bychom tedy použili předfiltr pro identifikaci knihovních jednotek, ve kterých je šance, že se noty vyskytnou, zvýšíme koncentraci z 0,038 \\% na 1,5 \\%, což je zhruba 39-násobný nárůst, při riziku menším než 2 \\%, že některé noty mineme. \n\n\\textbf{Pre-filter speed.} The EfficientNet b0 throughput on a CPU is over 30 images per second, or 2.5 M images per day. However, in practice, speed limits are imposed by the infrastructure for storing and retrieving the image collection. In case of the Moravian Library, this is implemented by a Solr index and an ImageServer that provide access to the entire 210+ TB collection of digitised images. These must not be over-tasked, so as not to degrade the user experience of the digital library itself. The practical constraint for the pre-filter is thus approx. 1 M images per day, or 12 images per second. Fortunately, for a production run, the ImageServer (which is the narrower bottleneck) can be cloned, so the process can be parallelised up to the limits of the Solr index.\n\n%\\textbf{TODO:TRANSLATE} Oba pracují s rychlostí cca 30 obr./s, tedy teoreticky 2,5 M obrázků za den. Rychlostní limit však představuje index Solr a ImageServer na straně MZK: je třeba je nezahltit, aby byla zachována uživatelská funkčnost digitální knihovny. Výsledná propustnost předfiltru je cca 1 M obrázků za den. Do poloprovozu, kterého se bude předfiltr účastnit, je možné tento proces paralelizovat naklonováním ImageServeru, takže finální propustnost může být výrazně vyšší.\n\n\n\\section{Data for music notation type classification}\n\nAll the data coming from the pre-filter contained only modern notation. \nDocuments containing chant and mensural notation typically are marked as musical sources in their metadata, but still within these sources it is helpful to distinguish pages that actually do not contain notation (title pages, pages that only contain text, especially in liturgical books and hymnals, empty leaves at composition boundaries, etc.). %; here, the postive and negative classes are therefore much more balanced.\n\nWe thus enriched this data with mensural and chant pages from Moravian Library sources known to contain these notation types, and balanced them with negative examples from these source types from the MZKblank dataset used previously for layout detection \\cite{dvorakStaffLayoutAnalysis2024}.\n\nThe total pages available for training the main stage are given in Table~\\ref{tab:data}.\n\n\\begin{table}[ht]\n \\centering\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.2}\n \n \\begin{tabularx}{0.7\\linewidth}{\n >{\\raggedright\\arraybackslash}X\n >{\\centering\\arraybackslash}X\n >{\\centering\\arraybackslash}X\n }\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Class name} & \\textbf{Music} & \\textbf{Background} \\\\\n \\midrule\n Choral & 3 766 & 1 215 \\\\\n Mensural & 1 035 & 2 033 \\\\\n Modern & 1 507 & 96 882 \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabularx}\n \\vspace{6pt}\n \\caption{Dataset sizes. For each of the classes, there is count of pages that contain some music notation (Music) and pages that do not (Background).}\n \\label{tab:data}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\section{Main stage experiments}\n\nFor the main stage, we use YOLO11 in the classification regime, initialised with the \\texttt{yolo11n-cls.pt} pre-trained weights. This model expects images scaled to 512$\\times$512 pixels. During training, evaluation, and inference, each image is resized such that its longer side is scaled to 512 pixels, while the remaining area is padded with black pixels to obtain a square input.\n\nFor training the main stage, we use the bootstrapped dataset produced manually from the pre-filter results, combined with the non-CWMN data. \n%This may not be data representative of the entire collection, but it is representative of the distribution of images that will be coming from the pre-filter.\n\n\\subsection{Two-step process setup}\n\nWe train two classifiers: a binary notation/nothing classifier (BiC), and a subsequent notation type classifier (MCM). \n%\nFor BiC, we found that training with the full class imbalance was counterproductive (already visible in performance on training data); best results were achieved by balancing the data 1:2 in positive:negative examples, undersampling the negative examples. For both the positive and negative examples, we used pages from all types of notation in this ratio (however, for chant notation, it turned out that only 1215 negative pages were available, so we used only this 1:1.215 ratio). For MCM, where we expect a more balanced distribution between positive and negative examples after the BiC stage, we balanced to 1:1:1:1.\n\nIn all experiments, stratified 10 \\% of the subsampled data was used for evaluation. (No hyperparameter tuning was done, so no validation set was needed.)\nAll the CWMN negative examples not used in training can then be used for testing, specifically for measuring the FPR in the representative highly imbalanced situation (1.5 \\% positive vs. 98.5 \\% negative examples).\n\n\\subsection{Single-step process setup}\n\nIn this alternative, we train only one classifier to process the imbalanced inputs from the pre-filter directly into four categories: CWMN, mensural, and chant notation, and nothing. While this introduces more positive classes in a situation where the negative class is the overwhelming majority of inputs, merging different kinds of notation might with distinct visual identities (not just in terms of notation, but also in the style of texts and even the textures of the paper or parchment) may in fact be counterproductive.\n\nAgain, we use the same balancing (or: 1:1:1:6 across the CWMN-mensural-chant-nothing classes).\n\n\\subsection{Main stage results}\n\nBecause datasets for the main stage have fully annotated ground truth, we can directly measure both FPR and FNR. We measure FNR on the balanced 10 \\% stratified evaluation sets, which contain all the positive examples that can be missed and thus contribute to FNR. For measuring FPR, we add all the 96.000+ negative examples that were subsampled out of the training set. %: the ``all negative'' test set.% The FPR results are thus measured on the more than 96.000 false positives of the pre-filter stage.\n\nIn the BiC step of the two-step process, FPR was 0.61 \\% and FNR 1.76 \\%. \nIn the MCM step, classification accuracy was 96.6 \\%, while contributing an additional 1.1 \\% FNR (notation images that were nevertheless discarded), for a combined FNR of 2.86 \\% (FNR over stages is summed: every falsely discarded page contributes to the total false negative page).\n\nIn the single-step process, the SiPA FPR was 0.57 \\%, FNR 2.12 \\%, and notation type classification accuracy was 96.8 \\%. This process is thus recommended.\n\nMost importantly, what is the output concentration from the main stage? With a 1.5 \\% input concentration (15 out of every 1000 input pages to the main stage contain notation), the SiPa model lets through 5,6 negative pages out of the 985, while retaining 14,7 of the 15 pages with notation. The output concentration is thus 72 \\% notation, or nearly three pages actually containing notation for every one false positive. This is comfortably past the 1:1 target. \n\n\\textbf{Speed.}\nInference speed was measured on 100.000 images with the SiPa model, input size of 512 x 512 pixels. The prediction was run on GPU (assumed to be available on the remote site). The test machine CPU Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz, GPU NVIDIA RTX A4000, and 32 GB of RAM.\n\n% \\begin{itemize}[nosep]\n% \\item CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz\n% \\item GPU: NVIDIA RTX A4000\n% \\item RAM: 32 GB\n% \\end{itemize}\n\nPreprocessing took on average 0.5 ms per image, inference 2.8. With all other processes, the average speed is around 4 ms per image, or approx. 250 images per second. (When run for individual images without optimized preprocessing, the predictions take around 300 ms per image, where the largest amount of time is taken up by image loading; this, however, is not the production setup.)\n\n\n\\section{Combined results}\n\nThe combined system (pre-filter and SiPa main stage) concentrates the ``ore'' from 0.0375 \\% to 72 \\%, going from a 1:2600 ratio of sheet music to non-music pages in the Moravian Library collection to nearly 3:1 in the detector's output stream. Out of the approx. 4.000.000 processed images (out of which 1.507 contained music notation), 570 non-notation images were let through the system, for a combined FPR of 0.015 \\%.\n\nThe FNR of the pre-filter stage is difficult to estimate, but at least the component caused by randomness in the fine-tuning process is limited to 1--2 \\% (though the main FNR component is likely to be systematic error). Re-finetuning the pre-filter on the true positive images it already detected is probably not going to help much: these are the notation images it is already able to detect. \n\n\\section{Discussion and Conclusions}\n\nWorking within the constraints of the production environment of the Moravian Library, we fine-tune off-the-shelf image classification models with bootstrapped data to produce a highly accurate tool for discovering music notation at library scale. Preliminarily, it seems there may be tens of thousands of documents of musical life just in the single Moravian Library that can contribute to the knowledge of musical life beyond its most prominent centres that accumulated specifically musical collection. We have already found instances of music in newspapers, magazines, textbooks, and other materials with much wider circulation than musical scores, thus significantly enriching the materials findable by those interested in what musical life looked like. \n\nImportantly, the system works at speeds that make the processing of large collections feasible. The pre-filter is designed to be parallelisable on premises. Furthermore, when a GPU is available, the end-to-end throughput of a single pre-filter instance is more than 500 images per second, meaning that 70.000.000 images can be processed in approx. 36 hours; the main stage has a throughput of approx. 250 images per second, depending on batching strategy.\n\nThe system is now in the middle of its production run. Out of the 70.000.000 images in the Moravian Library, 4.000.000 have passed through the pre-filter and are being processed. (The networking has in fact turned out to be the biggest bottleneck: external access to Moravian Library servers must be rate-limited.) It will be rather exciting to see the resulting batch of new source material that has never been properly findable for musicologists --- and also for those who care for local musical tradition: for instance, we have earlier found a unique arrangement of a Christmas carol from the city of Třebíč that is slated to be performed in the city. We believe that DEMUN has demonstrated the potential to substantially diversify and enrich the selection of musical sources at meaningful scales, and as such it brings an important and somewhat overlooked capability from the realm of OMR research to practice.\n\n\\section*{Acknowledgements}\n\n% (Redacted for peer review.)\nThis work has been supported by the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic (project OmniOMR of the NAKI III programme, no. DH23P03OVV008). The computing infrastructure was provided by the LINDAT/CLARIAH-CZ Research Infrastructure,\\footnote{\\url{https://lindat.cz}} supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (project no. LM2023062).\n\n% \\section{Author Contributions}\n\n% (Redacted for peer review.)\n\n% \\noindent\n% \\textbf{Vojtěch Dvořák:} Formal analysis, Investigation, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review \\& editing.\n\n% \\noindent\n% \\textbf{Filip B\\v{i}m:} Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Writing – review \\& editing.\n\n% \\noindent\n% \\textbf{Ji\\v{r}\\'{i} Mayer:} Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review \\& editing.\n\n% \\noindent\n% \\textbf{Martina Dvo\\v{r}\\'{a}kov\\'{a}:} Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Writing – review \\& editing.\n\n% \\noindent\n% \\textbf{Markéta Herzánová Vlková:} Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Writing – review \\& editing.\n\n% \\noindent\n% \\textbf{Petr Žabička:} Data curation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review \\& editing.\n\n% \\noindent\n% \\textbf{Jan Hajič jr.:} Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review \\& editing.\n\n% Conceptualization\n% Data curation\n% Formal analysis\n% Funding acquisition\n% Investigation\n% Methodology\n% Project administration\n% Resources\n% Software\n% Supervision\n% Validation\n% Visualization\n% Writing – original draft\n% Writing – review & editing\n\n\n\\bibliography{bibliography}\n\\bibliographystyle{ieeetr}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091157,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31957"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31957"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Mikael Kuusela"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Thea Sukianto, Mikael Kuusela, Donata Giglio, Anirban Mondal, Pulong Ma, Douglas W. Nychka"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Locally stationary Argo ocean heat content estimates: Modeling, validation and uncertainty quantification"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"52 pages, 27 figures"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"stat.AP physics.ao-ph stat.ME"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Argo profiling floats measure seawater temperature and salinity in the upper 2000 meters of the ocean. These floats are uniquely capable of measuring the global Ocean Heat Content (OHC), a quantity that is of central importance for understanding Earth Energy Imbalance. Yet, producing Argo-based OHC estimates with reliable uncertainties is statistically challenging due to the complex structure and large size of the Argo dataset. Here we present an end-to-end mapping and uncertainty quantification framework for Argo-based OHC estimation using state-of-the-art methods from spatio-temporal statistics. The framework is based on modeling vertically integrated Argo temperature profiles as a locally stationary Gaussian process defined over space and time. This enables us to produce computationally tractable OHC anomaly maps based on data-driven decorrelation scales estimated from the Argo observations. Our modeling choices are validated using statistical cross-validation, which demonstrates the importance of including a climatological time trend in the mean field and accounting for time in the covariance function. We quantify the uncertainty of these maps using local conditional simulation ensembles, a novel approach that leads to principled spatially and temporally correlated uncertainty quantification. A new paired cross-validation technique is presented to validate these uncertainties. The mapping framework is implemented in an open-source codebase that is designed to be modular, reproducible and extensible. To demonstrate the mapping and uncertainty quantification capabilities of this approach, we present new Argo OHC maps with uncertainties for 2004-2022 and report on various downstream climatological estimates and their uncertainties."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:59:11 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:59:11 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Sukianto","Thea",""],["Kuusela","Mikael",""],["Giglio","Donata",""],["Mondal","Anirban",""],["Ma","Pulong",""],["Nychka","Douglas W.",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Sukianto\",\n \"Thea\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Kuusela\",\n \"Mikael\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Giglio\",\n \"Donata\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Mondal\",\n \"Anirban\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Ma\",\n \"Pulong\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Nychka\",\n \"Douglas W.\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: OHC_paper.bbl\n================================================\n\\begin{thebibliography}{88}\n\\providecommand{\\natexlab}[1]{#1}\n\\providecommand{\\url}[1]{\\texttt{#1}}\n\\renewcommand{\\UrlFont}{\\rmfamily}\n\\providecommand{\\urlprefix}{URL }\n\\expandafter\\ifx\\csname urlstyle\\endcsname\\relax\n \\providecommand{\\doi}[1]{https://doi.org/\\discretionary{}{}{}#1}\\else\n \\providecommand{\\doi}{https://doi.org/\\discretionary{}{}{}\\begingroup\n \\urlstyle{rm}\\Url}\\fi\n\\providecommand{\\eprint}[2][]{\\url{#2}}\n\n\\bibitem[{Allison et~al.(2019)Allison, Roberts, Palmer, Hermanson, Killick,\n Rayner, Smith,, and Andrews}]{Allison2019}\nAllison, L.~C., C.~D. Roberts, M.~D. Palmer, L.~Hermanson, R.~E. Killick, N.~A.\n Rayner, D.~M. Smith, and M.~B. Andrews, 2019: Towards quantifying uncertainty\n in ocean heat content changes using synthetic profiles. \\textit{Environmental\n Research Letters}, \\textbf{14~(8)}, 084\\,037.\n\n\\bibitem[{Argo(2023)}]{ArgoDataJan2023}\nArgo, 2023: {Argo} float data and metadata from {Global Data Assembly Centre\n (Argo GDAC)} - {S}napshot of {Argo} {GDAC} of {J}anuary 10th 2023.\n \\textit{SEANOE}, \\doi{10.17882/42182#98916}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Argo(2025)}]{argo-products}\nArgo, 2025: {Argo} data products.\n \\urlprefix\\url{https://argo.ucsd.edu/data/argo-data-products/}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Bamston et~al.(1997)Bamston, Chelliah,, and Goldenberg}]{ONI}\nBamston, A.~G., M.~Chelliah, and S.~B. Goldenberg, 1997: Documentation of a\n highly {ENSO}‐related {SST} region in the equatorial {P}acific: Research\n note. \\textit{Atmosphere-Ocean}, \\textbf{35~(3)}, 367--383,\n \\doi{10.1080/07055900.1997.9649597}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Barker and McDougall(2020)Barker, and McDougall}]{Barker2020}\nBarker, P.~M., and T.~J. McDougall, 2020: Two interpolation methods using\n multiply-rotated piecewise cubic {H}ermite interpolating polynomials.\n \\textit{Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology}, \\textbf{37~(4)},\n 605--619, \\doi{10.1175/JTECH-D-19-0211.1}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Barnes(1964)}]{Barnes1964}\nBarnes, S.~L., 1964: A technique for maximizing details in numerical weather\n map analysis. \\textit{Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology},\n \\textbf{3~(4)}, 396 -- 409,\n \\doi{10.1175/1520-0450(1964)003<0396:ATFMDI>2.0.CO;2}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Barnes(1973)}]{Barnes1973}\nBarnes, S.~L., 1973: {Mesoscale objective map analysis using weighted\n time-series observations}. Tech. Rep. NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL NSSL 62,\n {National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) / NOAA}.\n \\urlprefix\\url{https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/17647}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Baugh and McKinnon(2022)Baugh, and McKinnon}]{Baugh_and_McKinnon2022}\nBaugh, S., and K.~McKinnon, 2022: Hierarchical {B}ayesian modeling of ocean\n heat content and its uncertainty. \\textit{The Annals of Applied Statistics},\n \\textbf{16~(4)}, 2603--2625.\n\n\\bibitem[{Bond et~al.(2015)Bond, Cronin, Freeland,, and Mantua}]{Bond2015}\nBond, N.~A., M.~F. Cronin, H.~Freeland, and N.~Mantua, 2015: Causes and impacts\n of the 2014 warm anomaly in the {NE Pacific}. \\textit{Geophysical Research\n Letters}, \\textbf{42~(9)}, 3414--3420, \\doi{10.1002/2015GL063306}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Boyer et~al.(2016)}]{boyer_etal2016}\nBoyer, T., and Coauthors, 2016: Sensitivity of global upper-ocean heat content\n estimates to mapping methods, {XBT} bias corrections, and baseline\n climatologies. \\textit{Journal of Climate}, \\textbf{29~(13)}, 4817 -- 4842,\n \\doi{10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0801.1}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Cabanes et~al.(2013)}]{Cabanes2013}\nCabanes, C., and Coauthors, 2013: The {CORA} dataset: validation and\n diagnostics of in-situ ocean temperature and salinity measurements.\n \\textit{Ocean Science}, \\textbf{9~(1)}, 1--18, \\doi{10.5194/os-9-1-2013}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Cheng et~al.(2017)Cheng, Trenberth, Fasullo, Boyer, Abraham,, and\n Zhu}]{Cheng2017}\nCheng, L., K.~E. Trenberth, J.~Fasullo, T.~Boyer, J.~Abraham, and J.~Zhu, 2017:\n Improved estimates of ocean heat content from 1960 to 2015. \\textit{Science\n Advances}, \\textbf{3~(3)}, e1601\\,545, \\doi{10.1126/sciadv.1601545}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Cheng et~al.(2019)Cheng, Trenberth, Fasullo, Mayer, Balmaseda,, and\n Zhu}]{Cheng_etal2019}\nCheng, L., K.~E. Trenberth, J.~T. Fasullo, M.~Mayer, M.~Balmaseda, and J.~Zhu,\n 2019: Evolution of ocean heat content related to {ENSO}. \\textit{Journal of\n Climate}, \\textbf{32~(12)}, 3529--3556, \\doi{10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0607.1}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Cheng and Zhu(2015)Cheng, and Zhu}]{Cheng2015}\nCheng, L., and J.~Zhu, 2015: Influences of the choice of climatology on ocean\n heat content estimation. \\textit{Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic\n Technology}, \\textbf{32~(2)}, 388 -- 394, \\doi{10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00169.1}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Fox-Kemper et~al.(2021)}]{IPCC6-ch9}\nFox-Kemper, B., and Coauthors, 2021: Ocean, cryosphere and sea level change.\n \\textit{Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of\n Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel\n on Climate Change}, 1211–1362, \\doi{10.1017/9781009157896.011}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Fritsch and Carlson(1980)Fritsch, and Carlson}]{Fritsch1980}\nFritsch, F.~N., and R.~E. Carlson, 1980: Monotone piecewise cubic\n interpolation. \\textit{SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis}, \\textbf{17~(2)},\n 238--246, \\doi{10.1137/0717021}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Gaillard et~al.(2016)Gaillard, Reynaud, Thierry, Kolodziejczyk,, and\n von Schuckmann}]{Gaillard2016}\nGaillard, F., T.~Reynaud, V.~Thierry, N.~Kolodziejczyk, and K.~von Schuckmann,\n 2016: In situ–based reanalysis of the global ocean temperature and salinity\n with {ISAS}: Variability of the heat content and steric height.\n \\textit{Journal of Climate}, \\textbf{29~(4)}, 1305 -- 1323,\n \\doi{10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0028.1}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Garcia et~al.(2024)}]{Garcia2024}\nGarcia, H.~E., and Coauthors, 2024: {World Ocean Atlas 2023, volume 3:\n Dissolved} oxygen, apparent oxygen utilization, and dissolved oxygen\n saturation. \\textit{NOAA Atlas NESDIS 91}, \\doi{10.25923/rb67-ns53}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Gerber and Nychka(2021)Gerber, and Nychka}]{Gerber2021}\nGerber, F., and D.~Nychka, 2021: Fast {C}ovariance {P}arameter {E}stimation of\n {S}patial {G}aussian {P}rocess {M}odels using {N}eural {N}etworks.\n \\textit{Stat}, \\textbf{10~(1)}, e382, \\doi{10.1002/sta4.382}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Giglio et~al.(2023)Giglio, Monselesan,, and Palmer}]{ME4OH}\nGiglio, D., D.~Monselesan, and M.~Palmer, 2023: Experimental protocol for\n {MapEval4OceanHeat}, an objective assessment of mapping methods used to\n estimate ocean heat content change. Zenodo, \\doi{10.5281/zenodo.10291852}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Giglio et~al.(2026)Giglio, Sukianto, Kuusela,, and\n Mills}]{Giglio_etal2026_Zenodo}\nGiglio, D., T.~Sukianto, M.~Kuusela, and B.~K.-A. Mills, 2026: Global ocean\n heat content anomalies and ocean heat uptake based on mapping {A}rgo data\n using local {G}aussian processes. Zenodo, \\doi{10.5281/zenodo.18187866}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Gilford et~al.(2024)Gilford, Giguere,, and Pershing}]{Gilford2024}\nGilford, D.~M., J.~Giguere, and A.~J. Pershing, 2024: Human-caused ocean\n warming has intensified recent hurricanes. \\textit{Environmental Research:\n Climate}, \\textbf{3~(4)}, 045\\,019.\n\n\\bibitem[{Good et~al.(2013)Good, Martin,, and Rayner}]{Good2013}\nGood, S.~A., M.~J. Martin, and N.~A. Rayner, 2013: {EN4}: Quality controlled\n ocean temperature and salinity profiles and monthly objective analyses with\n uncertainty estimates. \\textit{Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans},\n \\textbf{118~(12)}, 6704--6716, \\doi{10.1002/2013JC009067}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Gouretski(2018)}]{Gouretski2018}\nGouretski, V., 2018: {World Ocean Circulation Experiment -- Argo Global\n Hydrographic Climatology}. \\textit{Ocean Science}, \\textbf{14~(5)},\n 1127--1146, \\doi{10.5194/os-14-1127-2018}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Hakuba et~al.(2024)}]{Hakuba2024}\nHakuba, M.~Z., and Coauthors, 2024: Trends and variability in {Earth's} energy\n imbalance and ocean heat uptake since 2005. \\textit{Surveys in Geophysics},\n \\textbf{45~(6)}, 1721--1756, \\doi{10.1007/s10712-024-09849-5}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Hermanson et~al.(2024)Hermanson, Dunstone, Eade,, and\n Smith}]{Hermanson_etal2023}\nHermanson, L., N.~Dunstone, R.~Eade, and D.~Smith, 2024: An ensemble\n reconstruction of ocean temperature, salinity, and the {A}tlantic meridional\n overturning circulation 1960–2021. \\textit{Quarterly Journal of the Royal\n Meteorological Society}, \\textbf{150~(758)}, 98--111, \\doi{10.1002/qj.4587}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Higdon(1998)}]{Higdon1998}\nHigdon, D., 1998: A process-convolution approach to modelling temperatures in\n the {N}orth {A}tlantic {O}cean. \\textit{Environmental and Ecological\n Statistics}, \\textbf{5~(2)}, 173--190.\n\n\\bibitem[{Higdon(2002)}]{Higdon2002}\nHigdon, D., 2002: Space and space-time modeling using process convolutions.\n \\textit{Quantitative methods for current environmental issues}, Springer,\n 37--56.\n\n\\bibitem[{Higdon et~al.(1999)Higdon, Swall,, and Kern}]{Higdon1999}\nHigdon, D.~M., J.~Swall, and J.~C. Kern, 1999: Non-stationary spatial modeling.\n \\textit{Bayesian Statistics 6. Proceedings of the Sixth Valencia\n International Meeting}, Oxford University Press, 761--768.\n\n\\bibitem[{Hosoda et~al.(2008)Hosoda, Ohira,, and Nakamura}]{Hosoda2008}\nHosoda, S., T.~Ohira, and T.~Nakamura, 2008: A monthly mean dataset of global\n oceanic temperature and salinity derived from {Argo} float observations.\n \\textit{{JAMSTEC Report on Research and Development}}, \\textbf{8}, 47--59.\n\n\\bibitem[{Hughes et~al.(2017)}]{Hughes2017}\nHughes, T.~P., and Coauthors, 2017: Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching\n of corals. \\textit{Nature}, \\textbf{543~(7645)}, 373--377.\n\n\\bibitem[{IPCC(2023)}]{IPCC6}\nIPCC, 2023: \\textit{Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working\n Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental\n Panel on Climate Change}. Cambridge University Press,\n \\doi{10.1017/9781009157896}.\n\n\\bibitem[{{IPRC}(2008)}]{IPRC}\n{IPRC}, 2008: Documentation for gridded {A}rgo temperature/salinity and\n absolute dynamic height products.\n \\urlprefix\\url{https://apdrc.soest.hawaii.edu/projects/Argo/data/Documentation/gridded-var.pdf},\n technical Documentation for the IPRC Argo gridded data products.\n International Pacific Research Center, University of Hawai'i at M\\={a}noa.\n\n\\bibitem[{Johnson et~al.(2016)Johnson, Lyman,, and Loeb}]{Johnson2016}\nJohnson, G., J.~Lyman, and N.~Loeb, 2016: Improving estimates of {E}arth's\n energy imbalance. \\textit{Nature Climate Change}, \\textbf{6}, 639–640,\n \\doi{10.1038/nclimate3043}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Johnson and Lyman(2020)Johnson, and Lyman}]{Johnson2020}\nJohnson, G.~C., and J.~M. Lyman, 2020: Warming trends increasingly dominate\n global ocean. \\textit{Nature Climate Change}, \\textbf{10}, 757–761,\n \\doi{10.1038/s41558-020-0822-0}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Johnson et~al.(2024)}]{Johnson2024}\nJohnson, G.~C., and Coauthors, 2024: {G}lobal {O}ceans [in ``{S}tate of the\n {C}limate in 2023'']. \\textit{Bulletin of the American Meteorological\n Society}, \\textbf{105~(8)}, S156--S213, \\doi{10.1175/BAMS-D-24-0100.1}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Johnson et~al.(2025)}]{Johnson2025}\nJohnson, G.~C., and Coauthors, 2025: {G}lobal {O}ceans [in ``{S}tate of the\n {C}limate in 2024'']. \\textit{Bulletin of the American Meteorological\n Society}, \\textbf{106~(8)}, S173--S232, \\doi{10.1175/BAMS-D-25-0074.1}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Kato et~al.(2018)}]{Kato2018}\nKato, S., and Coauthors, 2018: Surface irradiances of {Edition 4.0 Clouds and\n the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled\n (EBAF)} data product. \\textit{Journal of Climate}, \\textbf{31~(11)}, 4501 --\n 4527, \\doi{10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0523.1}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Knutson et~al.(2010)}]{Knutson2010}\nKnutson, T.~R., and Coauthors, 2010: Tropical cyclones and climate change.\n \\textit{Nature Geoscience}, \\textbf{3~(3)}, 157--163.\n\n\\bibitem[{Kuusela and Stein(2018)Kuusela, and Stein}]{Kuusela2018}\nKuusela, M., and M.~L. Stein, 2018: Locally stationary spatio-temporal\n interpolation of {Argo} profiling float data. \\textit{Proceedings of the\n Royal Society A}, \\textbf{474}, \\doi{https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0400}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Lenzi et~al.(2023)Lenzi, Bessac, Rudi,, and Stein}]{Lenzi2023}\nLenzi, A., J.~Bessac, J.~Rudi, and M.~L. Stein, 2023: Neural {N}etworks for\n {P}arameter {E}stimation in {I}ntractable {M}odels. \\textit{Computational\n Statistics $\\And$ Data Analysis}, \\textbf{185}, 107\\,762,\n \\doi{10.1016/j.csda.2023.107762}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Li et~al.(2022)Li, Church, McDougall,, and Barker}]{Li2022}\nLi, Y., J.~A. Church, T.~J. McDougall, and P.~M. Barker, 2022: Sensitivity of\n observationally based estimates of ocean heat content and thermal expansion\n to vertical interpolation schemes. \\textit{Geophysical Research Letters},\n \\textbf{49~(24)}, e2022GL101\\,079, \\doi{10.1029/2022GL101079}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Li et~al.(2023)Li, England,, and Groeskamp}]{li_etal2023}\nLi, Z., M.~H. England, and S.~Groeskamp, 2023: Recent acceleration in global\n ocean heat accumulation by mode and intermediate waters. \\textit{Nature\n Communications}, \\textbf{14~(1)}, 6888, \\doi{10.1038/s41467-023-42468-z}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Loeb et~al.(2018)}]{Loeb2018}\nLoeb, N.~G., and Coauthors, 2018: {Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy\n System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA)\n Edition-4.0} data product. \\textit{Journal of Climate}, \\textbf{31~(2)}, 895\n -- 918, \\doi{10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0208.1}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Lu et~al.(2020)Lu, Liu, Li, Li, Wu, Sun,, and Xu}]{Lu2020}\nLu, S., Z.~Liu, H.~Li, Z.~Li, X.~Wu, C.~Sun, and J.~Xu, 2020: \\textit{{Manual\n of Global Ocean Argo} gridded data set {(BOA\\_Argo) (Version 2019)}}.\n Available at:\n \\url{https://argo.ucsd.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/361/2020/07/User_Manual_BOA_Argo-2020.pdf}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Lyman and Johnson(2023)Lyman, and Johnson}]{Lyman2023}\nLyman, J.~M., and G.~C. Johnson, 2023: Global high-resolution random forest\n regression maps of ocean heat content anomalies using in situ and satellite\n data. \\textit{Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology},\n \\textbf{40~(5)}, 575 -- 586, \\doi{10.1175/JTECH-D-22-0058.1}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Ma(2025)}]{ma2025asymmetric}\nMa, P., 2025: Asymmetric space-time covariance functions via hierarchical\n mixtures. arXiv:2511.07959 [stat.ME].\n\n\\bibitem[{Marti et~al.(2022)}]{Marti_etal2022}\nMarti, F., and Coauthors, 2022: Monitoring the ocean heat content change and\n the {E}arth energy imbalance from space altimetry and space gravimetry.\n \\textit{Earth System Science Data}, \\textbf{14~(1)}, 229--249,\n \\doi{10.5194/essd-14-229-2022}.\n\n\\bibitem[{McDougall and Barker(2011)McDougall, and Barker}]{TEOS-10}\nMcDougall, T., and P.~Barker, 2011: Getting started with {TEOS-10} and the\n {Gibbs Seawater (GSW)} oceanographic toolbox. \\textit{SCOR/IAPSO WG},\n \\textbf{127}, 1--28.\n\n\\bibitem[{McPhaden(2012)}]{McPhaden2012}\nMcPhaden, M.~J., 2012: A 21st century shift in the relationship between {ENSO}\n {SST} and warm water volume anomalies. \\textit{Geophysical Research Letters},\n \\textbf{39~(9)}, L09\\,706.\n\n\\bibitem[{Meyssignac et~al.(2019)}]{Meyssignac2019}\nMeyssignac, B., and Coauthors, 2019: Measuring global ocean heat content to\n estimate the {E}arth energy imbalance. \\textit{Frontiers in Marine Science},\n \\textbf{6}, \\doi{10.3389/fmars.2019.00432}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Meyssignac et~al.(2023)}]{meyssignac_etal2023}\nMeyssignac, B., and Coauthors, 2023: How accurate is accurate enough for\n measuring sea-level rise and variability. \\textit{Nature Climate Change},\n \\textbf{13~(8)}, 796--803, \\doi{10.1038/s41558-023-01735-z}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Meyssignac et~al.(2024)}]{Meyssignac2024}\nMeyssignac, B., and Coauthors, 2024: North {A}tlantic heat transport\n convergence derived from a regional energy budget using different ocean heat\n content estimates. \\textit{Surveys in Geophysics}, \\textbf{45~(6)},\n 1855--1874.\n\n\\bibitem[{Mogen et~al.(2022)}]{Mogen2022}\nMogen, S.~C., and Coauthors, 2022: Ocean biogeochemical signatures of the\n {North Pacific Blob}. \\textit{Geophysical Research Letters}, \\textbf{49~(9)},\n e2021GL096\\,938.\n\n\\bibitem[{Nychka et~al.(2018)Nychka, Hammerling, Krock,, and\n Wiens}]{Nychka2018}\nNychka, D., D.~Hammerling, M.~Krock, and A.~Wiens, 2018: Modeling and emulation\n of nonstationary {Gaussian} fields. \\textit{Spatial Statistics}, \\textbf{28},\n 21--38, \\doi{10.1016/j.spasta.2018.08.006}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Park et~al.(2023)Park, Kuusela, Giglio,, and Gray}]{Park2023}\nPark, B., M.~Kuusela, D.~Giglio, and A.~Gray, 2023: {Spatiotemporal local\n interpolation of global ocean heat transport using Argo floats: A debiased\n latent Gaussian process approach}. \\textit{The Annals of Applied Statistics},\n \\textbf{17~(2)}, 1491--1520, \\doi{10.1214/22-AOAS1679}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Porcu et~al.(2021)Porcu, Furrer,, and Nychka}]{Porcu2021}\nPorcu, E., R.~Furrer, and D.~Nychka, 2021: 30 years of space–time covariance\n functions. \\textit{WIREs Computational Statistics}, \\textbf{13}, e1512,\n \\doi{10.1002/wics.1512}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Ridgway et~al.(2002)Ridgway, Dunn,, and Wilkin}]{Ridgway2002}\nRidgway, K.~R., J.~R. Dunn, and J.~L. Wilkin, 2002: Ocean interpolation by\n four-dimensional weighted least squares--{A}pplication to the waters around\n {A}ustralasia. \\textit{Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology},\n \\textbf{19~(9)}, 1357--1375.\n\n\\bibitem[{Riser et~al.(2016)}]{Riser2016}\nRiser, S.~C., and Coauthors, 2016: Fifteen years of ocean observations with the\n global {A}rgo array. \\textit{Nature Climate Change}, \\textbf{6~(2)},\n 145--153.\n\n\\bibitem[{Roemmich et~al.(2015)Roemmich, Church, Gilson, Monselesan, Sutton,,\n and Wijffels}]{Roemmich2015}\nRoemmich, D., J.~Church, J.~Gilson, D.~Monselesan, P.~Sutton, and S.~Wijffels,\n 2015: Unabated planetary warming and its ocean structure since 2006.\n \\textit{Nature Climate Change}, \\textbf{5~(3)}, 240--245.\n\n\\bibitem[{Roemmich and Gilson(2009)Roemmich, and Gilson}]{Roemmich2009}\nRoemmich, D., and J.~Gilson, 2009: The 2004–2008 mean and annual cycle of\n temperature, salinity, and steric height in the global ocean from the {Argo}\n program. \\textit{Progress in Oceanography}, \\textbf{82~(2)}, 81--100,\n \\doi{10.1016/j.pocean.2009.03.004}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Roemmich and Gilson(2020)Roemmich, and Gilson}]{RG2019}\nRoemmich, D., and J.~Gilson, 2020: {R}oemmich--{G}ilson {A}rgo climatology.\n \\urlprefix\\url{https://sio-argo.ucsd.edu/RG_Climatology.html}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Roemmich et~al.(2009)}]{Roemmich2009_ArgoProgram}\nRoemmich, D., and Coauthors, 2009: The {Argo} program: Observing the global\n ocean with profiling floats. \\textit{Oceanography}, \\textbf{22~(2)}, 34--43.\n\n\\bibitem[{Sainsbury-Dale et~al.(2024)Sainsbury-Dale, Zammit-Mangion,, and\n Huser}]{SainsburyDale2024}\nSainsbury-Dale, M., A.~Zammit-Mangion, and R.~Huser, 2024: Likelihood-free\n parameter estimation with neural {B}ayes estimators. \\textit{The American\n Statistician}, \\textbf{78~(1)}, 1--14, \\doi{10.1080/00031305.2023.2249522}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Sainsbury-Dale et~al.(2025)Sainsbury-Dale, Zammit-Mangion, Richards,,\n and Huser}]{SainsburyDale2025}\nSainsbury-Dale, M., A.~Zammit-Mangion, J.~Richards, and R.~Huser, 2025: Neural\n {B}ayes estimators for irregular spatial data using graph neural networks.\n \\textit{Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics}, \\textbf{34~(3)},\n 1153--1168, \\doi{10.1080/10618600.2024.2433671}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Sala et~al.(2025)Sala, Giglio, Capotondi, Sukianto,, and\n Kuusela}]{Sala2025}\nSala, J., D.~Giglio, A.~Capotondi, T.~Sukianto, and M.~Kuusela, 2025: Leading\n dynamical processes of global marine heatwaves in an ocean state estimate.\n \\textit{Ocean Science}, \\textbf{21~(5)}, 2463--2479,\n \\doi{10.5194/os-21-2463-2025}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Savita et~al.(2022)}]{Savita2022}\nSavita, A., and Coauthors, 2022: Quantifying spread in spatiotemporal changes\n of upper-ocean heat content estimates: An internationally coordinated\n comparison. \\textit{Journal of Climate}, \\textbf{35~(2)}, 851 -- 875,\n \\doi{10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0603.1}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Schmidtko et~al.(2013)Schmidtko, Johnson,, and Lyman}]{Schmidtko2013}\nSchmidtko, S., G.~C. Johnson, and J.~M. Lyman, 2013: {MIMOC: A} global monthly\n isopycnal upper-ocean climatology with mixed layers. \\textit{Journal of\n Geophysical Research: Oceans}, \\textbf{118~(4)}, 1658--1672,\n \\doi{10.1002/jgrc.20122}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Seager et~al.(2015)Seager, Hoerling, Schubert, Wang, Lyon, Kumar,\n Nakamura,, and Henderson}]{Seager2015}\nSeager, R., M.~Hoerling, S.~Schubert, H.~Wang, B.~Lyon, A.~Kumar, J.~Nakamura,\n and N.~Henderson, 2015: Causes of the 2011–14 {California} drought.\n \\textit{Journal of Climate}, \\textbf{28~(18)}, 6997 -- 7024,\n \\doi{10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00860.1}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Storto et~al.(2022)Storto, Cheng,, and Yang}]{Storto_etal2022}\nStorto, A., L.~Cheng, and C.~Yang, 2022: Revisiting the 2003–18 deep ocean\n warming through multiplatform analysis of the global energy budget.\n \\textit{Journal of Climate}, \\textbf{35~(14)}, 4701 -- 4717,\n \\doi{10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0726.1}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Storto and Yang(2024)Storto, and Yang}]{Storto_and_Yang2024}\nStorto, A., and C.~Yang, 2024: Acceleration of the ocean warming from 1961 to\n 2022 unveiled by large-ensemble reanalyses. \\textit{Nature Communications},\n \\textbf{15~(1)}, 545, \\doi{10.1038/s41467-024-44749-7}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Szekely et~al.(2026)Szekely, Gourrion, Pouliquen,, and\n Reverdin}]{Szekely2025}\nSzekely, T., J.~Gourrion, S.~Pouliquen, and G.~Reverdin, 2026: {CORA, Coriolis\n Ocean Dataset for Reanalysis}. SEANOE, \\doi{10.17882/46219}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Trenberth and Cheng(2022)Trenberth, and Cheng}]{Trenberth_etal2022}\nTrenberth, K.~E., and L.~Cheng, 2022: A perspective on climate change from\n {E}arth’s energy imbalance. \\textit{Environmental Research: Climate},\n \\textbf{1~(1)}, 013\\,001, \\doi{10.1088/2752-5295/ac6f74}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Trenberth et~al.(2018)Trenberth, Cheng, Jacobs, Zhang,, and\n Fasullo}]{Trenberth2018-jw}\nTrenberth, K.~E., L.~Cheng, P.~Jacobs, Y.~Zhang, and J.~Fasullo, 2018:\n Hurricane {Harvey} links to ocean heat content and climate change adaptation.\n \\textit{Earths Future}, \\textbf{6~(5)}, 730--744.\n\n\\bibitem[{Trenberth et~al.(2025)Trenberth, Cheng, Pan, Fasullo,, and\n Mayer}]{Trenberth2025}\nTrenberth, K.~E., L.~Cheng, Y.~Pan, J.~Fasullo, and M.~Mayer, 2025: Distinctive\n pattern of global warming in ocean heat content. \\textit{Journal of Climate},\n \\textbf{38~(9)}, 2155 -- 2168, \\doi{10.1175/JCLI-D-24-0609.1}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Udaya~Bhaskar et~al.(2007)Udaya~Bhaskar, Ravichandran,, and\n Devender}]{UdayaBhaskar2007}\nUdaya~Bhaskar, T. V.~S., M.~Ravichandran, and R.~Devender, 2007: An operational\n objective analysis system at {INCOIS} for generation of {Argo} value added\n products. Tech. Rep. INCOIS-MOG-ARGO-TR-04-2007, {Indian National Centre for\n Ocean Information Services (INCOIS)}. Version 2.0. Available at:\n \\url{https://argo.ucsd.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/361/2020/05/Incois_Argo_ObjectiveAnalysis_Ver2.0.pdf}.\n\n\\bibitem[{van Oldenborgh et~al.(2017)}]{Van_Oldenborgh2017}\nvan Oldenborgh, G.~J., and Coauthors, 2017: Attribution of extreme rainfall\n from {Hurricane Harvey}, {August} 2017. \\textit{Environmental Research\n Letters}, \\textbf{12~(12)}, 124\\,009.\n\n\\bibitem[{von Schuckmann et~al.(2016)}]{Von_Schuckmann2016-rf}\nvon Schuckmann, K., and Coauthors, 2016: An imperative to monitor {E}arth's\n energy imbalance. \\textit{Nature Climate Change}, \\textbf{6~(2)}, 138--144.\n\n\\bibitem[{von Schuckmann et~al.(2023)}]{von_Schuckmann2023}\nvon Schuckmann, K., and Coauthors, 2023: Heat stored in the {E}arth system\n 1960--2020: where does the energy go? \\textit{Earth System Science Data},\n \\textbf{15~(4)}, 1675--1709, \\doi{10.5194/essd-15-1675-2023}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Walchessen et~al.(2024)Walchessen, Lenzi,, and\n Kuusela}]{Walchessen2024}\nWalchessen, J., A.~Lenzi, and M.~Kuusela, 2024: Neural likelihood surfaces for\n spatial processes with computationally intensive or intractable likelihoods.\n \\textit{Spatial Statistics}, \\textbf{62}, 100\\,848.\n\n\\bibitem[{Walchessen et~al.(2025)Walchessen, Zammit-Mangion, Huser,, and\n Kuusela}]{Walchessen2025}\nWalchessen, J., A.~Zammit-Mangion, R.~Huser, and M.~Kuusela, 2025: Neural\n conditional simulation for complex spatial processes. arXiv:2508.20067\n [stat.ME].\n\n\\bibitem[{Wilson et~al.(2016)Wilson, Hu, Salakhutdinov,, and Xing}]{Wilson2016}\nWilson, A.~G., Z.~Hu, R.~Salakhutdinov, and E.~P. Xing, 2016: Deep kernel\n learning. \\textit{Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on\n Artificial Intelligence and Statistics}, A.~Gretton, and C.~C. Robert, Eds.,\n Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol.~51, 370--378.\n\n\\bibitem[{Wong et~al.(2020)}]{Wong2020}\nWong, A. P.~S., and Coauthors, 2020: {Argo} data 1999–2019: Two million\n temperature-salinity profiles and subsurface velocity observations from a\n global array of profiling floats. \\textit{Frontiers in Marine Science},\n \\textbf{7}, 700, \\doi{10.3389/fmars.2020.00700}.\n\n\\bibitem[{{World Meteorological Organization}(2022)}]{WMO2021}\n{World Meteorological Organization}, 2022: \\textit{State of the Global Climate\n 2021}. WMO-No. 1290, WMO, Geneva,\n \\urlprefix\\url{https://library.wmo.int/idurl/4/56300}.\n\n\\bibitem[{{World Meteorological Organization}(2023)}]{WMO2022}\n{World Meteorological Organization}, 2023: \\textit{State of the Global Climate\n 2022}. WMO-No. 1316, WMO, Geneva,\n \\urlprefix\\url{https://library.wmo.int/idurl/4/66214}.\n\n\\bibitem[{{World Meteorological Organization}(2024)}]{WMO2023}\n{World Meteorological Organization}, 2024: \\textit{State of the Global Climate\n 2023}. WMO-No. 1347, WMO, Geneva,\n \\urlprefix\\url{https://library.wmo.int/idurl/4/68835}.\n\n\\bibitem[{Yarger et~al.(2022)Yarger, Stoev,, and Hsing}]{Yarger2022}\nYarger, D., S.~Stoev, and T.~Hsing, 2022: A functional-data approach to the\n {A}rgo data. \\textit{The Annals of Applied Statistics}, \\textbf{16~(1)},\n 216--246.\n\n\\bibitem[{Zhang et~al.(2022)Zhang, Wang, Liu, Lu, Sun, Wei,, and\n Zhang}]{Zhang2022}\nZhang, C., D.~Wang, Z.~Liu, S.~Lu, C.~Sun, Y.~Wei, and M.~Zhang, 2022: Global\n gridded {Argo} dataset based on gradient-dependent optimal interpolation.\n \\textit{Journal of Marine Science and Engineering}, \\textbf{10~(5)}, 650,\n \\doi{10.3390/jmse10050650}.\n\n\\end{thebibliography}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: OHC_paper.tex\n================================================\n%% Version 6.1, 1 September 2021\n%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% TemplateV6.1.tex -- LaTeX-based blank template for submissions to the \n% American Meteorological Society\n%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% PREAMBLE\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n%% Start with one of the following:\n% 1.5-SPACED VERSION FOR SUBMISSION TO THE AMS\n\\documentclass{ametsocV6.1}\n\n% TWO-COLUMN JOURNAL PAGE LAYOUT---FOR AUTHOR USE ONLY\n% \\documentclass[twocol]{ametsocV6.1}\n\n\\usepackage{subfigure}\n\n\\newcommand{\\OHC}{\\mathrm{OHC}}\n\\newcommand{\\W}{\\mathcal{W}}\n\\newcommand{\\GP}{\\text{GP}}\n\\newcommand{\\s}{\\bm{s}}\n\\renewcommand{\\u}{\\bm{u}}\n\\newcommand{\\iid}{\\overset{\\text{i.i.d.}}{\\sim}}\n\\newcommand{\\Var}{\\text{Var}}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n%%% To be entered by author:\n\n%% May use \\\\ to break lines in title:\n\n\\title{Locally stationary Argo ocean heat content estimates: Modeling, validation and uncertainty quantification}\n\n%% Enter authors' names and affiliations as you see in the examples below.\n%\n%% Use \\correspondingauthor{} and \\thanks{} (\\thanks command to be used for affiliations footnotes, \n%% such as current affiliation, additional affiliation, deceased, co-first authors, etc.)\n%% immediately following the appropriate author.\n%\n%% Note that the \\correspondingauthor{} command is NECESSARY.\n%% The \\thanks{} commands are OPTIONAL.\n%\n%% Enter affiliations within the \\affiliation{} field. Use \\aff{#} to indicate the affiliation letter at both the\n%% affiliation and at each author's name. Use \\\\ to insert line breaks to place each affiliation on its own line.\n\n%\\authors{Author One,\\aff{a}\\correspondingauthor{Author One, email@email.com} \n%Author Two,\\aff{a} \n%Author Three,\\aff{b} \n%Author Four,\\aff{a} \n%Author Five\\thanks{Author Five's current affiliation: NCAR, Boulder, Colorado},\\aff{c} \n%Author Six,\\aff{c} \n%Author Seven,\\aff{d}\n% and Author Eight\\aff{a,d}\n%}\n%\n%\\affiliation{\\aff{a}{First Affiliation}\\\\\n%\\aff{b}{Second Affiliation}\\\\\n%\\aff{c}{Third Affiliation}\\\\\n%\\aff{d}{Fourth Affiliation}\n%}\n\n\\authors{Thea Sukianto,\\aff{a}\\correspondingauthor{Mikael Kuusela, mkuusela@andrew.cmu.edu}\nMikael Kuusela,\\aff{a}$^\\dagger$\\thanks{$^\\dagger$These authors share co-second authorship.}\nDonata Giglio,\\aff{b}$^\\dagger$\nAnirban Mondal,\\aff{c}\nPulong Ma,\\aff{d}\nand Douglas W. Nychka\\aff{e}\n}\n\n\n\n\\affiliation{\\aff{a}{Department of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University}\\\\\n\\aff{b}{Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder}\\\\\n\\aff{c}{Department of Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, and Statistics, Case Western Reserve University}\\\\\n\\aff{d}{Department of Statistics, Iowa State University}\\\\\n\\aff{e}{Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics,\nColorado School of Mines}\n}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% ABSTRACT\n%\n% Enter your abstract here\n% Abstracts should not exceed 250 words in length!\n%\n \n\\abstract{Argo profiling floats measure seawater temperature and salinity in the upper 2000 meters of the ocean. These floats are uniquely capable of measuring the global Ocean Heat Content (OHC), a quantity that is of central importance for understanding Earth Energy Imbalance. Yet, producing Argo-based OHC estimates with reliable uncertainties is statistically challenging due to the complex structure and large size of the Argo dataset. Here we present an end-to-end mapping and uncertainty quantification framework for Argo-based OHC estimation using state-of-the-art methods from spatio-temporal statistics. The framework is based on modeling vertically integrated Argo temperature profiles as a locally stationary Gaussian process defined over space and time. This enables us to produce computationally tractable OHC anomaly maps based on data-driven decorrelation scales estimated from the Argo observations. Our modeling choices are validated using statistical cross-validation, which demonstrates the importance of including a climatological time trend in the mean field and accounting for time in the covariance function. We quantify the uncertainty of these maps using local conditional simulation ensembles, a novel approach that leads to principled spatially and temporally correlated uncertainty quantification. A new paired cross-validation technique is presented to validate these uncertainties. The mapping framework is implemented in an open-source codebase that is designed to be modular, reproducible and extensible. To demonstrate the mapping and uncertainty quantification capabilities of this approach, we present new Argo OHC maps with uncertainties for 2004--2022 and report on various downstream climatological estimates and their uncertainties. \\vfill \\vspace{5cm} {\\small\nThis Work has not yet been peer-reviewed and is provided by the contributing Author(s) as a means to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical Work on a noncommercial basis. Copyright and all rights therein are maintained by the Author(s) or by other copyright owners. It is understood that all persons copying this information will adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each Author's copyright. This Work may not be reposted without explicit permission of the copyright owner.}\n}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n%% Necessary!\n\\maketitle\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT/CAPSULE SUMMARY\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%\n% If you are including an optional significance statement for a journal article or a required capsule summary for BAMS \n% (see www.ametsoc.org/ams/index.cfm/publications/authors/journal-and-bams-authors/formatting-and-manuscript-components for details), \n% please apply the necessary command as shown below:\n%\n% Significance Statement (all journals except BAMS)\n%\n%\\statement\n%\t Enter significance statement here, no more than 120 words. See \\url{www.ametsoc.org/index.cfm/ams/publications/author-information/significance-statements/} for details.\n%\n%% Capsule (BAMS only)\n%%\n%\\capsule\n% Enter BAMS capsule here, no more than 30 words. See \\url{www.ametsoc.org/index.cfm/ams/publications/author-information/formatting-and-manuscript-components/#capsule} for details.\n%\n%% * * If using twocol mode, you will need to use the commands \"twocolsig\" and \"twocolcapsule\" in place of \"sig\" and \"capsule\"\n%% to ensure that the text box correctly spans across both columns.\n%\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% MAIN BODY OF PAPER\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%\n\n%% In all cases, if there is only one entry of this type within\n%% the higher level heading, use the star form: \n%%\n% \\section{Section title}\n% \\subsection*{subsection}\n% text...\n% \\section{Section title}\n\n%vs\n\n% \\section{Section title}\n% \\subsection{subsection one}\n% text...\n% \\subsection{subsection two}\n% \\section{Section title}\n\n%%%\n% \\section{First primary heading}\n\n% \\subsection{First secondary heading}\n\n% \\subsubsection{First tertiary heading}\n\n% \\paragraph{First quaternary heading}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% TABLES---INSERT NEAR IN-TEXT DISCUSSION\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Enter tables near where they are discussed within the document. \n%% Please place tables before/after paragraphs, not within a paragraph.\n%%\n%\n%\\begin{table}[t]\n%\\caption{This is a sample table caption and table layout. Enter as many tables as\n% necessary at the end of your manuscript. Table from Lorenz (1963).}\\label{t1}\n%\\begin{center}\n%\\begin{tabular}{ccccrrcrc}\n%\\hline\\hline\n%$N$ & $X$ & $Y$ & $Z$\\\\\n%\\hline\n% 0000 & 0000 & 0010 & 0000 \\\\\n% 0005 & 0004 & 0012 & 0000 \\\\\n% 0010 & 0009 & 0020 & 0000 \\\\\n% 0015 & 0016 & 0036 & 0002 \\\\\n% 0020 & 0030 & 0066 & 0007 \\\\\n% 0025 & 0054 & 0115 & 0024 \\\\\n%\\hline\n%\\end{tabular}\n%\\end{center}\n%\\end{table}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% FIGURES---INSERT NEAR IN-TEXT DISCUSSION\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Enter figures near where they are discussed within the document.\n%% Please place figures before/after paragraphs, not within a paragraph.\n% %\n%\n%\\begin{figure}[t]\n% \\noindent\\includegraphics[width=19pc,angle=0]{figure01.pdf}\\\\\n% \\caption{Enter the caption for your figure here. Repeat as\n% necessary for each of your figures. Figure from \\protect\\cite{Knutti2008}.}\\label{f1}\n%\\end{figure}\n\n\\section{Introduction}\n\nMonitoring Ocean Heat Content (OHC) is crucial for understanding the state and evolution of the climate system and how changes in the Earth's climate can impact ecosystems and human societies. Since more than 90\\% of the excess heat in the climate system is absorbed by the ocean, monitoring changes in global OHC is to date the most accurate way to estimate the absolute magnitude of the Earth's energy imbalance (EEI) (\\cite{IPCC6}, \\cite{Meyssignac2019}, \\cite{Hakuba2024}) driving the warming of the planet. It is therefore a key observable to quantify the effectiveness of mitigation efforts to reduce EEI. Monitoring OHC changes is also key to our understanding of global and regional sea level changes, as rising ocean temperatures raise sea level through thermal expansion and by accelerating the melt of polar ice sheets (\\cite{IPCC6-ch9}). Furthermore, an increasing OHC (e.g., \\cite{Johnson2025}, \\cite{Trenberth2025}) has been associated with increasing intensity of tropical cyclones (e.g., \\cite{Knutson2010}, \\cite{Gilford2024}, \\cite{Van_Oldenborgh2017}, \\cite{Trenberth2018-jw}) and has already been linked to ecosystem impacts as, e.g., alterations in global biogeochemical cycles, shifts in fish populations, and coral bleaching (\\cite{Hughes2017}).\n\nEstimating OHC requires observing subsurface temperature. Hence, the Argo array of profiling floats (\\cite{Roemmich2009_ArgoProgram}, \\cite{Wong2020}) is key for global estimates of OHC, as it provides unprecedented (near-)global measurements of temperature, salinity and pressure in the upper 2,000~m of the ocean, with no seasonal bias. The program has been collecting data since the early 2000s and has played an essential role in our understanding of OHC and its changes in the past two decades (e.g., \\cite{Roemmich2015}, \\cite{Riser2016}).\n\nEstimating OHC using Argo is not trivial: Most floats collect data every 10 days and the array was designed to achieve a nominal sampling resolution of $3^\\circ \\times 3^\\circ$ in longitude and latitude.\nTo produce an estimate of global or regional OHC, one therefore needs to statistically interpolate these in-situ observations onto a regular grid in space and time. This yields mapped fields which can then be integrated over space to estimate OHC. Producing these gridded maps involves making modeling assumptions about the statistical distribution of the oceanographic fields. Different available products are based on different modeling assumptions, which contributes to the substantial observed spread in OHC estimates (\\cite{Von_Schuckmann2016-rf}, \\cite{von_Schuckmann2023}, \\cite{Savita2022}, \\cite{Hakuba2024}). While some work has been done to analyze the sensitivity to modeling choices (e.g., \\cite{boyer_etal2016}, \\cite{Allison2019}, \\cite{Savita2022}), a comprehensive assessment of the ecosystem of mapping methods is ongoing (\\cite{ME4OH}). Most importantly, open-source code for reproducing the different products is often not available and statistical uncertainties are usually not provided.\n\nIn this work, we introduce a new statistical mapping framework for estimating global and regional OHC from Argo observations. Our framework is based on the locally stationary Gaussian process approach introduced for Argo mapping in \\cite{Kuusela2018}. Here we adapt and extend that methodology to inferring OHC: a key contribution of this work is a novel method for rigorously quantifying the statistical uncertainty of the mapped fields. The uncertainty quantification method is based on producing a conditional simulation ensemble of the locally stationary mapped fields. The ensemble members reflect the variability and spatio-temporal dependence of the maps conditional on the Argo observations. The ensemble can therefore be used to obtain uncertainties on downstream scientific quantities, such as the spatial integral for OHC, by simply processing each ensemble member and looking at the distribution of the resulting values. Crucially, this approach accounts for the spatio-temporal correlation in the conditional distribution of the mapped fields and fully propagates this dependence into the uncertainty of the OHC estimates and their dependence across time. The spatio-temporal dependence encoded by the conditional simulation ensemble is validated using a new paired cross-validation approach.\n\nIn addition to providing statistically rigorous mapping uncertainties, our framework carries over the benefits of the local mapping approach of \\cite{Kuusela2018} into the OHC estimates. Namely, we use flexible, data-driven local models for both the mean field and the anomalies. Specifically, the anomalies are mapped using an anisotropic local covariance function that includes both space and time and whose variance and decorrelation scale parameters are estimated from the data. When compared with a model that does not estimate covariance parameters directly from the input data and does not include time in the covariance function \\citep[e.g.][]{Roemmich2009}, the model used here was shown to yield more accurate estimates of Argo temperature fields in \\cite{Kuusela2018}. In the following, we demonstrate a similar improvement for OHC estimates.\n\nFurthermore, we investigate the sensitivity of our estimates to the inclusion of a climatological time trend in the mean field used to produce the maps. We find that the estimated OHC trend can nearly double depending on this modeling choice (an increase that is consistent with previous studies, e.g., \\cite{Cheng2015}). Using statistical cross-validation, we use Argo data itself to show that the model without the time trend is misspecified which leads to downward biased estimates of the OHC trend. On the other hand, we find that cross-validation does not indicate any obvious misspecification in the model where a local time trend is included in the mean field.\n\nAlongside this paper, we release the full source code of the mapping framework at \\url{https://github.com/ttsukianto/LocalGP_OHC} under a permissive open-source license. The codebase enables reproducing every step of our pipeline, starting from the near-real-time Argo observations available at the Argo Global Data Assembly Centres (GDACs). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first fully reproducible Argo-based end-to-end mapping framework for OHC. The codebase is also designed to be modular and easily extensible to a variety of oceanographic mapping tasks beyond OHC. Our hope is that this codebase will serve as a starting point for community efforts to further study, compare and improve Argo mapping methods toward increasingly accurate estimates of OHC and other oceanographic quantities of interest.\n\nWe demonstrate our mapping framework by creating OHC estimates and associated conditional simulation ensembles for years 2004--2022 on a $1^\\circ \\times 1^\\circ \\times 1 \\text{ month}$ grid. We employ the new OHC estimates and, in particular, the uncertainty quantification capability enabled by the conditional simulations in a number of climatological case studies, each of which demonstrates an uncertainty quantification task that would not have been possible to achieve using existing OHC data products.\n\nA LocalGP data product based on the methodology described here is underway as part of an ongoing effort and some of the estimates from the project \\citep{Giglio_etal2026_Zenodo} have been used in a number of climate assessments (\\cite{WMO2023, WMO2022, WMO2021}, \\cite{Johnson2024, Johnson2025}), oceanographic studies (\\cite{von_Schuckmann2023}, \\cite{Hakuba2024}, \\cite{Meyssignac2024}, \\cite{Sala2025}) and intercomparison efforts \\citep{ME4OH}. This paper serves as a formal description of the mapping and uncertainty quantification methodology underlying the LocalGP product and estimates.\n\nThe rest of the manuscript is structured as follows: In Section~\\ref{sec:background}, we provide a brief description of Argo data, define the OHC mapping problem and briefly review the related literature. Section~\\ref{sec:method} describes in detail each step of our OHC mapping and uncertainty quantification pipeline. We validate our modeling and methodological choices in Section~\\ref{sec:validation}. Section~\\ref{sec:OHC_product} illustrates the resulting OHC estimates and uncertainties in a number of climatological case studies and Section~\\ref{sec:discussion} concludes with a discussion.\n\n\\section{Data description, problem definition and related work} \\label{sec:background}\n\n\\subsection{Argo float data} \\label{sec:Argo_data}\n\nArgo autonomous profiling floats (\\cite{Roemmich2009_ArgoProgram}, \\cite{Riser2016}, \\cite{Wong2020}) have been deployed since 1999, with the array reaching sparse (near-)global coverage of temperature, salinity, and pressure observations in the upper 2000~m of the ocean in the mid-2000s. Many mapped Argo data products therefore start from 2004 or 2005. The $3^\\circ \\times 3^\\circ$ global target coverage was achieved around 2007, although the array has kept expanding since then. For the past decade or so, roughly 4000 floats have been consistently available, surpassing the original target of 3000 active floats.\n\nOf particular relevance to this work is the fact that there is a certain degree of heterogeneity in the vertical sampling of the Argo array (\\cite{Wong2020}). First, the vertical sampling of the early floats is much sparser than that of the more recent floats. This is because the early floats used the Argos satellite system for data transmission which limited the profiles to 50--100 vertical observations, while the more recent floats use the Iridium communication system enabling the profiles to have up to $\\sim$1000 observations. Second, different profiles span the depth range in the upper 2000 dbar to a different extent. For most floats, the shallowest observation is a few meters below the surface, limiting the observations available for the top 10--15 dbar of the vertical column. Similarly, not all profiles actually reach 2000 dbar. As an example, in the early years of Argo, some floats in the tropics did not sample below 1000 dbar due to limitations on buoyancy adjustment. This resulted in, e.g., the Central Atlantic to be poorly sampled below 1000 dbar during those years. Finally, even when the ocean is deep enough and the float is operating as planned, the deepest reported observation is typically tens of meters short of 2000 dbar. Our OHC mapping method needs to take these complexities in Argo's vertical sampling into account, as discussed below in Section~\\ref{sec:background}\\ref{sec:probDef}.\n\nFor the estimates presented in this paper, we use as the input data profiles collected during 2004--2022 and distributed in the January 2023 snapshot of the Argo GDAC (\\cite{ArgoDataJan2023}). The data need to be quality-controlled before being used in the mapping pipeline. In this work, we use the quality control procedure described in \\cite{Kuusela2018} and implemented in the \\texttt{processDACdata.m} script in the codebase accompanying this paper. The procedure is based on the built-in Argo quality control flags and a number of additional filtering steps. We use delayed-mode (D) or adjusted real-time-mode (A) data whenever available but accept unadjusted real-time-mode (R) profiles if D or A mode data are not available. A total of 1,731,330 profiles for 2004--2022 passed the quality control steps. In addition, we exclude profiles at the same spatial location if their timestamp difference is $\\leq$ 15 minutes, which removed an additional 220 profiles.\n\n\\subsection{Problem definition} \\label{sec:probDef}\n\nThe ocean heat content (OHC) at time $t$ between depths $z_u$ and $z_d$ within spatial domain $D$ is the time series defined by the integral\n\\begin{equation}\n\\OHC_{z_u}^{z_d}(t) = \\underset{{(x,y) \\in D}}{\\iint} \\int_{z=z_u}^{z=z_d} \\rho_0 \\, c_{p,0} \\, T(x,y,z,t)\\,\\mathrm{d}z \\,\\mathrm{d}S(x,y). \\label{eq:OHC_def}\n\\end{equation}\nHere $T(x,y,z,t)$ is the potential temperature (computed from temperature, salinity, and pressure in-situ measurements using the TEOS-10 toolbox; \\cite{TEOS-10}) at longitude $x$, latitude $y$, pressure $z$ (a pressure change of 1~dbar corresponds to roughly 1~m) and time $t$; density $\\rho_0$ is 1030 kg/m$^3$; and specific heat capacity $c_{p,0}$ is $3989.244 \\ \\mathrm{J\\cdot kg^{-1} \\cdot K^{-1}}$.\n\nThanks to Argo's fine vertical sampling, the vertical integral in \\eqref{eq:OHC_def} is straightforward to compute accurately (see Section~\\ref{sec:method}\\ref{sec:verticalInt}). Denoting the vertical integral by $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x,y,t)$, we have\n\\begin{equation}\n\\OHC_{z_u}^{z_d}(t) = \\underset{{(x,y) \\in D}}{\\iint} \\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x,y,t) \\,\\mathrm{d}S(x,y) \\approx \\sum_{i} \\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x_{i},y_{i},t) \\cdot S_{i}, \\label{eq:OHC_def_xy}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $(x_{i},y_{i})$ are points on a $1^\\circ \\times 1^\\circ$ grid over $D$ and $S_{i}$ is the area of a $1^\\circ \\times 1^\\circ$ grid element whose center point is $(x_{i},y_{i})$. With a slight abuse of terminology, we will call $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x,y,t)$ regional OHC (it is strictly speaking heat content per unit area with units Jm$^{-2}$).\n\nIn the following, our primary focus is to estimate the time series $\\OHC_{z_u}^{z_d}(t)$ at monthly time intervals. The main challenge in estimating $\\OHC_{z_u}^{z_d}(t)$ from Argo is that $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x,y,t)$ is only known at those spatio-temporal locations where a float collected a vertical profile. So in order to compute the spatial integral over $D$ in Eq.~\\eqref{eq:OHC_def_xy}, we need to interpolate the observed $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}$ values onto a regular $1^\\circ \\times 1^\\circ \\times 1 \\text{ month}$ grid over space and time. Hence, the key task here is to produce accurate interpolations of $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}$ and quantify the associated mapping uncertainties so as to obtain accurate estimates of the integral defined in \\eqref{eq:OHC_def_xy} and its uncertainty.\n\nIn this work, the domain $D$ is either the Argo-sampled part of the global ocean or selected subregions thereof. We use the ocean mask $D_{RG}$ provided with the Roemmich--Gilson 2019 data product (\\cite{RG2019}) to identify locations that are as deep or deeper than $z_d$. The domain includes the majority of all oceanic basins (with the exception of the Arctic ocean), but excludes polar regions, continental shelves, and other shallow areas. Additionally, we intersect $D_{RG}$ with a data availability mask $D_{\\text{data}}$, defined to include only those grid points whose local neighborhood contains enough data to reliably estimate the seasonal cycle. This is needed since the lack of wintertime observations in certain parts of the ocean with seasonal ice cover caused instabilities in estimating the seasonal cycle in those regions. The final domain of integration is then $D = D_s \\cap D_{RG} \\cap D_{\\text{data}}$, where $D_s$ is either the entire ocean or a specific subregion of interest.\n\nSince we can only compute the vertical integral $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x,y,t)$ for profiles ranging at least from $z_u$ to $z_d$, data availability in the vertical direction (see Section~\\ref{sec:background}\\ref{sec:Argo_data}) affects our choice of depth ranges to consider. In this work, we run the mapping pipeline to estimate OHC time series over two disjoint vertical sections. The upper section ranges from 15 dbar to 975 dbar and the lower from 975 dbar to 1850 dbar with the corresponding time series denoted by $\\OHC_{15}^{975}(t)$ and $\\OHC_{975}^{1850}(t)$, respectively. The choice of 15 dbar and 1850 dbar as the endpoints is motivated by the low availability of profiles with observations shallower than 15 dbar or deeper than 1850 dbar. Additionally, as described in Section~\\ref{sec:background}\\ref{sec:Argo_data}, many profiles are cut short near 1000 dbar. This led us to divide the ocean into two vertical sections at 975 dbar in order to include the maximal number of profiles in the analysis. Altogether, 1,540,593 profiles were available for the upper section and 1,128,932 for the lower section. More profiles could be included by further subdividing the sections (e.g., \\cite{Giglio_etal2026_Zenodo}), but these two sections suffice for our purposes of introducing the framework here.\n\n\\subsection{Related work}\n\nThe work presented here builds on a number of efforts that, over time, have advanced mapping methods and highlighted the implications of different assumptions in the statistical model used to fill in observational gaps as well as the need for improved uncertainty estimates in gridded ocean heat content products (e.g., \\cite{boyer_etal2016}, \\cite{Allison2019}, \\cite{Savita2022}, \\cite{von_Schuckmann2023}). Thanks to these efforts, several Argo-based gridded oceanic fields are currently available to the oceanographic community (e.g., \\cite{argo-products}). Methods underlying these estimates include objective analysis (\\cite{Gaillard2016}, \\cite{Cheng2017}, \\cite{Szekely2025}, \\cite{Cabanes2013}, \\cite{Gouretski2018}, \\cite{UdayaBhaskar2007}, \\cite{Hosoda2008}, \\cite{Good2013}, \\cite{Garcia2024}, \\cite{Schmidtko2013}, \\cite{Roemmich2009}, \\cite{Zhang2022}, \\cite{Hermanson_etal2023}), the Barnes successive correction method (\\cite{Lu2020}, \\cite{Barnes1964}, \\cite{Barnes1973}; using weighing functions), a variational analysis approach (\\cite{IPRC}), hierarchical Bayesian modeling (\\cite{Baugh_and_McKinnon2022}), functional data analysis (\\cite{Yarger2022}), and random forest regression (\\cite{Lyman2023}; merging information from in-situ and satellite data). As in many products currently available, the mapping method presented here uses objective mapping (also known as kriging or optimal interpolation) to fill in observational gaps. Yet, we incorporate the advances from \\cite{Kuusela2018} who showed that estimating the variance and spatial/temporal decorrelation scale parameters from the input data in a moving-window fashion allows for an improved representation of the spatial and temporal variability of interest. This enables producing improved maps and is key to rigorous uncertainty quantification, leading to the local conditional simulation algorithm developed in this work.\n\n\\section{Mapping and uncertainty quantification methodology} \\label{sec:method}\n\n\\subsection{Outline}\nOur OHC mapping framework is based on the following statistical model:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x,y,t) = \\mu (x,y,t) + a(x,y,t) + \\varepsilon(x,y,t), \\label{eq:model_def}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mu$ is a climatological mean field, $a$ is a zero-mean anomaly field that reflects transient deviations from the mean field and $\\varepsilon$ is a zero-mean spatially and temporally uncorrelated nugget effect that describes unresolved fine-scale variation (e.g., from mesoscale processes). This section describes the modeling and mapping process, divided into four steps:\n\\begin{enumerate}\n \\item Compute the vertical integral $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x,y,t)$ at the observed profile locations using PCHIP interpolation for the vertical sections defined in Section~\\ref{sec:background}\\ref{sec:probDef}.\n \\item Estimate the mean field $\\mu (x,y,t)$, which includes seasonal harmonics and a climatological time trend, using local polynomial regression.\n \\item Map the anomalies $a(x,y,t)$ using locally stationary Gaussian process regression with data-driven decorrelation scales.\n \\item Quantify the uncertainty of the $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x,y,t)$ field using an ensemble of spatially and temporally correlated local conditional simulations.\n\\end{enumerate}\n\n\\subsection{Vertical integration: PCHIP interpolation} \\label{sec:verticalInt}\nFor each observed Argo profile, we first compute the vertical integrals $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{15}^{975}(x_p,y_p,t_p)$ and $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{975}^{1850}(x_p,y_p,t_p)$ for the upper and lower depth sections defined in Section~\\ref{sec:background}\\ref{sec:probDef}. Here $(x_p,y_p)$ is the location and $t_p$ the timestamp of the $p$th profile. For each profile and vertical section, we perform vertical PCHIP interpolation (\\cite{Fritsch1980}) as implemented in the Matlab \\texttt{interp1} function over a fine grid of $5(z_d - z_u)$ evenly spaced depth points. Then, we numerically integrate the interpolated profile from $z_u$ to $z_d$ using the trapezoidal method to obtain the vertical integral $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x_p,y_p,t_p)$ for each $p$.\n\nPCHIP is well-suited for interpolating Argo profiles due to its shape-preserving property which helps it avoid spurious bumps in the interpolations (\\cite{Barker2020, Li2022}). In practice, the choice of the vertical integration method matters most for the sparser Argos profiles (see Section~\\ref{sec:background}\\ref{sec:Argo_data}); the more recent Iridium profiles are sampled densely enough that there are only small differences between reasonable integration methods. In the early phases of this work, we performed a study where we subsampled Iridium profiles to look like Argos profiles and then compared various integration methods against the Iridium ``ground truth''. The methods compared were a) trapezoidal integration without interpolation, b) Simpson's method without interpolation, c) trapezoidal integration with spline interpolation and d) trapezoidal integration with PCHIP interpolation. Out of the four, we found method d) to be the most accurate in terms of the mean, standard deviation, maximum and minimum of the signed integration error and hence chose to use it throughout the rest of the pipeline.\n\n\\subsection{Mean field: local polynomial regression}\n\\label{sec:mean-field}\n\nNote that the vertical integral $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}$ is only observed at the profile locations, so in order to produce an estimate of $\\OHC_{z_u}^{z_d}(t)$ and other related quantities, we will need to interpolate the above vertically integrated profiles onto a regular grid over the Argo-sampled part of the global ocean. Following the model definition in Eq.~\\eqref{eq:model_def}, we first estimate the mean field $\\mu (x,y,t)$.\n\nLet us define a square spatial window \n\\begin{equation}\n\\mathcal{W}(x^*,y^*)=[x^*-\\lambda, x^*+\\lambda] \\times [y^*-\\lambda, y^*+\\lambda]\n\\end{equation}\ncentered on location $(x^*,y^*)$ on a $1^\\circ \\times 1^\\circ$ grid over the domain $D$ defined in Section \\ref{sec:background}\\ref{sec:probDef}, where $\\lambda$ is a window size parameter in degrees.\n\nFollowing \\cite{Ridgway2002,Roemmich2009}, we estimate a climatological mean for each $(x^*,y^*)$ using a local polynomial regression function within $\\mathcal{W}(x^*,y^*)$:\n{\\allowdisplaybreaks\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{split}\nm_{x^*,y^*}(x,y,t) =&\\beta_0+\\beta_1(x-x^*)+\\beta_2(y-y^*)\\\\\n&+\\beta_3(x-x^*)(y-y^*)+\\beta_4(x-x^*)^2+\\beta_5(y-y^*)^2\\\\\n&+\\sum_{k=1}^6\\gamma_k\\sin\\left(2\\pi k \\frac{\\tau(t)}{365}\\right)+\\sum_{k=1}^6\\delta_k\\cos\\left(2\\pi k \\frac{\\tau(t)}{365}\\right)\\\\\n&+\\nu_1(t-t_D)+\\nu_2(t-t_D)^2, \\quad (x,y) \\in \\mathcal{W}(x^*,y^*),\n\\end{split}\n\\label{eq:mean_field}\n\\end{equation}}where $t$ is the time in Julian days, $\\tau(t) \\in [0,365]$ is the time in yeardays and $t_D$ is the midpoint of the time range of interest in Julian days. In this work, we add the linear and quadratic climatological time trend terms $\\nu_1(t-t_D)+\\nu_2(t-t_D)^2$ to the regression function definition in \\cite{Ridgway2002,Roemmich2009}. We investigate the effect of introducing these terms on the OHC estimates in Section~\\ref{sec:validation}\\ref{sec:val_mean_field}. For each grid point $(x^*,y^*)$, the regression parameters are estimated using least-squares estimates $(\\bm{\\hat\\beta},\\bm{\\hat\\gamma},\\bm{\\hat\\delta},\\bm{\\hat\\nu})$ over all profile locations $(x_p,y_p,t_p)$ within the window $\\mathcal{W}(x^*,y^*)$. The time-dependent mean field estimate at $(x^*,y^*)$ is then given by\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{split} \n \\hat{\\mu}(x^*,y^*,t) & = \\hat{m}_{x^*,y^*}(x^*,y^*,t) \\\\ & = \\hat{\\beta}_0+\\sum_{k=1}^6\\hat{\\gamma}_k\\sin\\left(2\\pi k \\frac{\\tau(t)}{365}\\right)+\\sum_{k=1}^6\\hat{\\delta}_k\\cos\\left(2\\pi k \\frac{\\tau(t)}{365}\\right)\n+\\hat{\\nu}_1(t-t_D)+\\hat{\\nu}_2(t-t_D)^2.\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\n\n\\subsection{Anomalies: locally stationary Gaussian process regression}\n\\label{sec:anom}\nWe next turn our attention to modeling the stochastic terms $a(x,y,t)$ and $\\varepsilon(x,y,t)$ in Eq.~\\eqref{eq:model_def}. Note that\n\\begin{equation}\n r(x,y,t) := \\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x,y,t) - \\mu (x,y,t) = a(x,y,t) + \\varepsilon(x,y,t),\n\\end{equation}\nso we can focus on modeling the zero-mean residual field $r(x,y,t)$ which we approximate by $\\hat{r}(x,y,t) = \\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x,y,t) - \\hat{\\mu} (x,y,t)$. To obtain the observed values of $r$, we compute $\\hat{r}$ at each observed location $(x_p,y_p,t_p)$ by mean-centering each vertically integrated profile, i.e., by subtracting $\\hat{\\mu}(x^*,y^*,t_p)$ from the profile, where $(x^*,y^*)$ is the spatial grid point closest to $(x_p,y_p)$.\n\nWe now interpolate $r$ onto a regular grid over the Argo-sampled global ocean using the locally stationary Gaussian process (GP) regression model from \\cite{Kuusela2018}. Fitting a global nonstationary model would be computationally challenging due to the large number of Argo profiles. Furthermore, it would be challenging to define a sufficiently flexible global covariance function that would accurately describe regional variability. The locally stationary moving-window approach introduced in \\cite{Kuusela2018} yields smoothly varying model parameter estimates and predictions over the global ocean while reducing the computational burden. \n\nLet us first define a spatio-temporal window\n\\begin{equation}\n\\widetilde{W}(x^*,y^*,t^*)=[x^*-\\lambda_G,x^*+\\lambda_G] \\times [y^*-\\lambda_G,y^*+\\lambda_G] \\times [t^*-\\lambda_t,t^*+\\lambda_t]\n\\end{equation}\ncentered on points $(x^*,y^*,t^*)$ on a $1^\\circ \\times 1^\\circ \\times 1$ month grid over $D \\times D_t$, where $D_t$ is the time domain of interest within the Argo sampling period. Now, let us consider the collection of these windows over all years in $D_t$,\n\\begin{equation}\nW(x^*,y^*,\\tau^*)= \\{ \\widetilde{W}(x^*,y^*,t^*) \\::\\: t^* \\in D_t, \\: t^* \\bmod 365 = \\tau^* \\}, \\end{equation}\nwhere $\\tau^* \\in [0,365]$ is a yearday on the same monthly grid as $t^*$.\nThen, within a given $W$, let us assume that the $\\widetilde{\\OHC}$ anomaly process for year $i$ is a zero-mean Gaussian process with the following definition:\n\\begin{equation}\na_i \\iid \\text{GP} (0,k(\\s_1,t_1,\\s_2,t_2;\\boldsymbol{\\theta}_{W})),\n\\label{eq:anomaly_def}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $(\\s,t)=(x,y,t)$ is an $i$th year spatio-temporal location within $W$, $\\boldsymbol{\\theta}_{W}=(\\phi_{W},\\theta_{W,\\text{lon}},\\theta_{W,\\text{lat}},\\theta_{W,t})$ is a vector of covariance parameters for $W$, and the independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) assumption is across the years in $W$. More specifically, $k=\\phi_{W}\\exp(-d(\\s_1,t_1,\\s_2,t_2))$ is an anisotropic exponential space-time covariance function with a distance function defined by\n\\begin{equation}\n d(\\s_1,t_1,\\s_2,t_2) = \\sqrt{\\left(\\frac{x_1-x_2}{\\theta_{W,\\text{lon}}}\\right)^2+\\left(\\frac{y_1-y_2}{\\theta_{W,\\text{lat}}}\\right)^2+\\left(\\frac{t_1-t_2}{\\theta_{W,t}}\\right)^2}, \n \\label{eq:dist_def}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\theta_{W,\\text{lon}}$, $\\theta_{W,\\text{lat}}$ and $\\theta_{W,t}$ are the decorrelation scales within $W$.\n\nFollowing the model definition in \\eqref{eq:model_def}, for a given $W$, we additionally define an additive Gaussian nugget effect $\\varepsilon \\iid N(0,\\sigma^2_W)$, where $\\sigma^2_W$ is the nugget variance for $W$ and the i.i.d.~assumption is over both space and time in $W$. We then numerically find the maximum likelihood estimates of the model parameters for each $W$ using those mean-centered residuals $\\hat{r}$ that fall within $W$. For each model parameter $\\theta^k =\\phi,\\theta_{\\text{lon}},\\theta_{\\text{lat}},\\theta_{t},\\sigma^2$, this produces spatially and seasonally varying parameter estimates $\\hat{\\theta}^k_{W(x^*,y^*,\\tau^*)}$ as a function of $(x^*,y^*,\\tau^*)$. We found empirically that the effect of the seasonal variation in the $\\hat{\\theta}^k$'s is small. To improve robustness, we therefore opt to use the temporal medians of the parameter estimates as the final non-seasonally varying plug-in estimates. That is, for any $\\widetilde{W}$ centered at $(x^*,y^*) \\in D$, the final parameter estimates are given by $\\hat{\\theta}^k_{x^*,y^*} = \\underset{\\tau^*}{\\text{med}}(\\hat{\\theta}^k_{W(x^*,y^*,\\tau^*)})$, where the median is taken over the 1-month grid of $\\tau^*$'s.\n\nSince any finite subset of a Gaussian process follows a multivariate Gaussian distribution, the point prediction of $r(x^*,y^*,t^*)$ at a grid point $(x^*,y^*,t^*)$ is the mean of a Gaussian distribution conditioned on the data within $\\widetilde{W}(x^*,y^*,t^*)$ and with the $\\hat{\\theta}^k_{x^*,y^*}$'s plugged in as the model parameters. The mathematical details are given, for example, in \\citet{Kuusela2018}. It then remains to add the estimated mean field value $\\hat\\mu(x^*,y^*,t^*)$ to obtain the mapped regional OHC estimate $\\widehat{\\widetilde{\\OHC}}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x^*,y^*,t^*)$. \n\n\n\\subsection{Uncertainty quantification: local conditional simulations}\n\\label{sec:uq-condsim}\n\nTo quantify the uncertainty of our OHC estimate for month $t$ defined by Eq.~\\eqref{eq:OHC_def_xy}, we are ultimately interested in the predictive variance:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{split}\n\\Var(\\OHC_{z_u}^{z_d}(t)|\\text{data}) \\approx &\\sum_{i} \\Var(\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x_{i},y_{i},t)|\\text{data}) \\cdot S_{i}^2\\, +\\\\ \n&\\sum_{i,j} \\text{Cov}(\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x_{i},y_{i},t),\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x_{j},y_{j},t)|\\text{data}) \\cdot S_{i}S_{j}.\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nThe predictive variance $\\Var(\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x_{i},y_{i},t)|\\text{data})$ at a grid point $i$ is readily available using the local GP described above. However, the predictive covariance $\\text{Cov}(\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x_{i},y_{i},t),\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x_{j},y_{j},t)|\\text{data})$ does not immediately follow from the above model definition and would in any case be infeasible to compute, store and work with for all pairs of grid points $(i,j)$ over the Argo-sampled global ocean. Instead of attempting to compute the predictive covariance, we propose to simulate an ensemble of realizations from the conditional distribution $p(\\{\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x_{i},y_{i},t_{i})\\}_i|\\text{data})$. If we assume that the true regional OHC field is a Gaussian process, then the field conditional on the observed data is also a GP. Our goal is to simulate from this GP such that the simulations respect the spatio-temporal dependence structure implied by the local GPs within each window $\\widetilde{\\W}(x_i,y_i,t_i)$.\n\nOur local conditional simulation method, which has similarities with the unconditional simulation approach in \\cite{Nychka2018}, is based on the following argument: A broad class of non-stationary zero-mean spatio-temporal Gaussian processes can be expressed as convolutions of Gaussian white noise \\citep{Higdon1998,Higdon1999,Higdon2002}\n\\begin{equation}\n f(\\s,t) = \\int_{D \\times D_t} h_{\\s,t}(\\u,v) w(\\u,v) \\,\\mathrm{d}\\u \\,\\mathrm{d} v, \\quad (\\s,t) \\in D \\times D_t, \\label{eq:kernelConv}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $w(\\u,v)$ is a Gaussian white noise process over the spatio-temporal domain $D \\times D_t$ and the kernel $h_{\\s,t}(\\u,v)$ is localized so that it has most of its mass near $(\\s,t)$. The process $f(\\s,t)$ has covariance function\n\\begin{equation}\n k(\\s_1,t_1,\\s_2,t_2) = \\int_{D \\times D_t} h_{\\s_1,t_1}(\\u,v) h_{\\s_2,t_2}(\\u,v) \\,\\mathrm{d}\\u \\,\\mathrm{d} v. \\label{eq:convCov}\n\\end{equation}\nLet us now focus on a specific window $\\widetilde{\\W} (\\s^*,t^*)$. Within this window, the predictive covariance of the local Gaussian process model provides a reasonable approximation of $k(\\s_1,t_1,\\s_2,t_2)$. We can therefore use Eq.~\\eqref{eq:convCov} restricted to this window to find a kernel $h_{\\s^*,t^*}(\\u,v)$ for the midpoint of the window based on the local predictive covariance function within the window. By repeating this for all windows within $D \\times D_t$, we can find kernels $h_{\\s,t}(\\u,v)$ for all $(\\s,t) \\in D \\times D_t$. Kernels defined this way have bounded support within $\\widetilde{\\W} (\\s,t)$, so Eq.~\\eqref{eq:kernelConv} becomes\n\\begin{equation}\n f(\\s,t) = \\int_{\\widetilde{\\W} (\\s,t)} h_{\\s,t}(\\u,v) w(\\u,v) \\,\\mathrm{d}\\u \\,\\mathrm{d} v, \\quad (\\s,t) \\in D \\times D_t.\n\\end{equation}\nThis shows that to simulate $f(\\s,t)$ under this approach, it suffices to convolve white noise within $\\widetilde{\\W} (\\s,t)$ with the kernel $h_{\\s,t}(\\u,v)$.\n\nWhen discretized to a spatio-temporal grid and applied to the regional OHC fields $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x,y,t)$, this leads to the following local conditional simulation algorithm:\n\\begin{enumerate}\n \\item Simulate Gaussian white noise on the $1^\\circ \\times 1^\\circ \\times 1$ month grid over $D \\times D_t$ and keep fixed.\n \\item Compute the local predictive covariance matrix $\\bm{\\Sigma}_i$ using the local GP model for the window $\\widetilde{\\W}(x_i,y_i,t_i)$ centered on grid point $i$ with the model parameters estimated in Section~\\ref{sec:method}\\ref{sec:anom}.\n \\item Compute the symmetric matrix square root $\\bm{\\Sigma}_i^{1/2} = \\bm{U} \\bm{D}^{1/2} \\bm{U}^T$, where $\\bm{\\Sigma}_i = \\bm{U} \\bm{D} \\bm{U}^T$ is the eigendecomposition of $\\bm{\\Sigma}_i$.\n \\item Multiply $\\bm{\\Sigma}_i^{1/2}$ by the white noise from Step 1 within the window $\\widetilde{\\W}(x_i,y_i,t_i)$. Retain the value $f_i$ at the center point of the window. The conditional simulation ensemble member for grid point $i$ is then $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u,\\text{sim}}^{z_d}(x_{i},y_{i},t_i) = \\widehat{\\widetilde{\\OHC}}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x_i,y_i,t_i) + f_i$, where $\\widehat{\\widetilde{\\OHC}}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x_i,y_i,t_i)$ is the mapped value from Section~\\ref{sec:method}\\ref{sec:anom}.\n \\item Repeat steps 2--4 for all grid points in the domain $D \\times D_t$.\n \\item Repeat all previous steps for the desired number of conditional simulation ensemble members.\n\\end{enumerate}\nFigure~\\ref{fig:condsim-ex} illustrates the approach for a region in the North Atlantic; see also Appendix~\\ref{sec:condSimExamples} for example conditional simulations. These conditional simulation ensemble members reflect the predictive spatio-temporal dependence implied by the local GP model. In addition, the use of moving windows makes this approach computationally efficient. The most expensive operation in this algorithm is the eigendecomposition in Step 3, which needs to be computed only once for each window, irrespective of the number of conditional simulation realizations. The algorithm therefore scales well in the size of the conditional simulation ensemble. In Section \\ref{sec:validation}\\ref{sec:val_UQ}, we perform a cross-validation study to validate the simulated dependence against the observed dependence in the Argo-sampled ocean in 2005.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t] \n \\centering\n \\noindent\\includegraphics[width=15cm,trim = 0 0 0 4cm, clip=true]{./Figures/condsim_example.001.png}\\\\\n \\caption{Illustration of the local conditional simulation algorithm for a region in the North Atlantic (left panel) for $t^* = $ February 2005. The simulated value at the center point $(\\s^*,t^*)$ of the window $\\widetilde{W}(\\s^*,t^*)$ (yellow box, left panel) is obtained by convolving the white noise $w$ (panels (a)--(c)) with the spatio-temporal kernel $h$ (panels (d)--(f), showing $\\text{sign}(h)\\cdot\\sqrt{|h|}$) within the window. To better show the simulated spatial dependence, this figure does not show the conditional mean or the simulated nugget effect; see Appendix~\\ref{sec:condSimExamples} for example conditional simulations with these effects included.}\\label{fig:condsim-ex}\n\\end{figure}\n\nNow, to obtain an estimate of $\\Var(\\OHC_{z_u}^{z_d}(t)|\\text{data})$, we simply substitute $\\{\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u,\\text{sim}}^{z_d}(x_{i},y_{i},t)\\}_i$ into Eq.~\\eqref{eq:OHC_def_xy} for every ensemble member and compute the sample variance. We can similarly obtain uncertainties for other linear transformations of $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x,y,t)$, such as derivatives, fitted trends and temporal averages. We simply transform each ensemble member one at a time and compute the sample variance of the transformed quantities. (Several concrete examples are provided in Section~\\ref{sec:OHC_product}.) We can also use the ensemble to obtain predictions and potentially asymmetric uncertainties for nonlinear transformations of $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x,y,t)$. This is described in more detail in Section~\\ref{sec:OHC_product}\\ref{sec:OHC_ENSO_ccf}.\n\nWe have so far discussed OHC uncertainty quantification for a single vertical section. Recall from Section~\\ref{sec:background}\\ref{sec:probDef} that we estimate $\\OHC(t)$ over two vertical sections due to data availability. In this case, the predictive variance of the total OHC, $\\OHC(t) = \\OHC_{z_{u}}^{z}(t) + \\OHC_{z}^{z_{d}}(t)$, would be expressed as $\\Var(\\OHC(t)|\\text{data})=\\Var(\\OHC_{z_u}^{z}(t)|\\text{data})+\\Var(\\OHC_{z}^{z_d}(t)|\\text{data})+2\\,\\text{Cov}(\\OHC_{z_u}^{z}(t),\\OHC_{z}^{z_d}(t)|\\text{data})$, where $z$ is a cutoff depth between $z_u$ and $z_d$. Our present model does not incorporate the dependence between vertical sections, so we use a conservative upper bound, only requiring the predictive variance estimates for each individual vertical section, instead:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Var(\\OHC(t)|\\text{data})\\leq \\left(\\sqrt{\\Var(\\OHC_{z_u}^{z}(t)|\\text{data})}+\\sqrt{\\Var(\\OHC_{z}^{z_d}(t)|\\text{data})}\\right)^2. \\label{eq:UQ_UB}\n\\end{equation}\nModeling the vertical dependence to improve the mapped anomalies and uncertainty quantification is the subject of an upcoming extension (a brief discussion is provided in Section \\ref{sec:discussion}).\n\n\\subsection{Modular software pipeline}\n\nWe implement the mapping approach in a modular and extensible open-source software pipeline that enables the user to fully reproduce the above methodology from processing the Argo GDAC data to the final uncertainty quantification. We implement the pipeline in MATLAB and the codebase is freely available at \\url{https://github.com/ttsukianto/LocalGP_OHC/}. The preprocessing and postprocessing modules are currently tailored for OHC mapping using Argo temperature profile data, but the scripts are easily extensible to processing other variables of interest (e.g., salinity, steric height, mixed layer depth, etc.; an effort ongoing as part of a different project). The masking and mapping modules are already applicable to other variables of interest. Figure \\ref{fig:uml-diagram} shows the flow of data between each of the four main modules in the software pipeline. A full UML diagram for the mapping pipeline is provided in the above GitHub repository.\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h] \n \\centering\n \\noindent\\includegraphics[width=15cm,angle=0]{./Figures/ocean_variable_modeling_pipeline-condensed.png}\\\\\n \\caption{4-step software pipeline for mapping Argo data.}\\label{fig:uml-diagram}\n\\end{figure}\n\nThe preprocessing module (blue; \\texttt{preProcessing.m}) contains scripts that prepare the input data for mapping. \\texttt{processDACdata.m} implements the quality control method described in \\cite{Kuusela2018} and Section~\\ref{sec:background}\\ref{sec:Argo_data} of this paper on profiles from the Argo GDAC. Next, we vertically integrate these processed profiles (\\texttt{selectionAndVerticalIntegration.m}) as described in Section~\\ref{sec:method}\\ref{sec:verticalInt}. The output of this module is then the vertically integrated temperature profiles grouped into monthly files.\n \nThe masking module (green; \\texttt{masking.m}) filters the preprocessed data in these monthly files according to the domain $D$. In this work, this involves creating the data availability mask $D_{\\text{data}}$ (\\texttt{createDataMask.m}) as described in Section~\\ref{sec:background}\\ref{sec:probDef} and intersecting it with the mask $D_{\\text{RG}}$ from the Roemmich--Gilson 2019 data product (\\cite{RG2019}) (\\texttt{createCombinedMask.m}), but it is possible to extend the latter script to intersect with other custom masks. Since the mapping method relies on moving windows, we additionally create a basin mask (\\texttt{createBasinMask.m}) to ensure that the subsequent mapping steps for grid points in the Pacific Ocean do not use observations from the Atlantic Ocean and vice versa near Central America (other regions could be included in a similar manner). Finally, \\texttt{filterUsingMasks.m} filters out the data outside $D_{\\text{data}} \\cap D_{\\text{RG}}$.\n\nThe mapping module (orange; \\texttt{mapping.m}) produces estimates and conditional simulation ensembles for gridded fields according to the methodology described in Sections \\ref{sec:method}\\ref{sec:mean-field}--\\ref{sec:uq-condsim}. After estimating the mean field parameters (\\texttt{estimateMeanField.m}) using the filtered data and subtracting the mean to obtain the set of observed residuals (\\texttt{subtractMean.m}), we estimate the monthly decorrelation scales and variances (\\texttt{localMLE.m}). We then use the annual median of the monthly maximum likelihood estimates as the final parameter estimates to map the residuals (\\texttt{mapResiduals.m}) and produce the conditional simulation ensembles (\\texttt{localCondSim.m}). To convert from the residuals to the full fields (i.e., $\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{z_u}^{z_d}(x,y,t) = \\mu (x,y,t) + r(x,y,t)$), we use \\texttt{computeFullFields.m}.\n\nFinally, the postprocessing module (red; \\texttt{postProcessing.m}) performs post-mapping transformations for the variable of interest. In this work, this involves substituting the mapped regional OHC values and conditional simulation ensemble members for each grid point into Eq.~\\eqref{eq:OHC_def_xy} (i.e., integrating horizontally) to obtain the monthly estimates of OHC. Here, we implement postprocessing for OHC, but it is our expectation that the framework in this codebase will facilitate mapping and uncertainty quantification for other gridded fields as well. The codebase is designed so that this can simply be done by replacing the pre- and postprocessing modules with versions specific to the particular variable of interest.\n\n\\section{Sensitivity to modeling choices and method validation} \\label{sec:validation}\n\nIn Sections 4 and 5, we illustrate the OHC mapping pipeline using Argo temperature profiles from 2004--2022. As mentioned in Section 2b, we consider two vertical sections: 15--975 dbar (``Upper ocean'') and 975--1850 dbar (``Midocean''). Unless otherwise stated, in obtaining the following results, we set the mean field window size parameter to $\\lambda=5$ degrees, the Gaussian process spatial window size parameter to $\\lambda_G=10$ degrees, time window size parameter to $\\lambda_{t}=1.5$ months, and the number of conditional simulation ensemble members to 500.\n\nSection 4 studies the sensitivity of the OHC estimates to the inclusion of a time trend in the mean field (Section~4a) and temporal dependence in the model definition (Section~4b). In addition, Section~\\ref{sec:validation}\\ref{sec:val_UQ} validates the dependence structure in the conditional simulation ensembles. As in \\citet{Kuusela2018}, we compare the prediction errors for each modeling choice in two cross-validation scenarios: leave-one-observation-out (LOOO) and leave-one-float-out (LOFO) cross-validation. The latter is further extended to paired cross-validation in Section~\\ref{sec:validation}\\ref{sec:val_UQ}. We might imagine predicting OHC at a densely observed location to be the least difficult and predicting in an ocean region with few Argo floats to be the most difficult (if the decorrelation scales and the overall complexity of the ocean dynamics are similar in the two regions). These two cross-validation modes therefore represent approximate lower and upper bounds, respectively, on the difficulty of predicting the OHC at an unobserved location. \n\n\\subsection{Effect of mean field time trend} \\label{sec:val_mean_field}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Upper ocean]{\n \\includegraphics[width=8cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHC_trends/intTempFullField_15_975_2004_2022_Global.png}}\n \\subfigure[Midocean]{\n \\includegraphics[width=8cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHC_trends/intTempFullField_975_1850_2004_2022_Global.png}}\n \\caption{Ocean heat content time series and trends for different modeling choices.}\n \\label{fig:OHC_val_trend}\n\\end{figure}\n\nWe first explore the effect of including a time trend in the climatological mean field definition \\eqref{eq:mean_field} on the global OHC trend estimate. To this end, we produce variants of our OHC maps with $\\nu_1=\\nu_2=0$ (``NoTrend''), $\\nu_1 \\neq 0, \\nu_2=0$ (``Trend'') and $\\nu_1 \\neq 0, \\nu_2 \\neq 0$ (``Trend2''). In addition, we produce variants with a space-only covariance ($\\theta_{W,t} = \\infty$ in Eq.~\\eqref{eq:dist_def}) as well as a reproduction of the \\cite{Roemmich2009} product (``RG-like'') with $\\nu_1=\\nu_2=0$ and the covariance as described for the RG-like model in \\citet{Kuusela2018}. In these latter two cases, we set $\\lambda_{t}=0.5$ months for consistency with the original Roemmich--Gilson maps. (\\cite{Kuusela2018} investigated space-only maps for both $\\lambda_{t}=0.5$ months and $\\lambda_{t}=1.5$ months and found that the two cases have comparable predictive performance in the absence of the temporal decorrelation scale.)\n\nThe results (normalized to the area of the Argo-sampled global ocean) are shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:OHC_val_trend}, where we obtain each trend line by fitting a linear regression model with monthly factors for the seasonal cycle to each OHC time series. Consistent with \\cite{Cheng2015}, the RG-like (black) and models without the mean field time trend (cyan and blue) produce smaller OHC trends. The increase in the estimated upper ocean OHC trend is as large as 87\\% (cyan vs. pink or red) between the no trend and quadratic trend models. This difference is also apparent in the midocean, where the percent increase is as large as 133\\% (cyan vs. pink or red). The results also suggest that including a quadratic time trend in the mean field has minimal effect on the OHC trend estimate for this time period when compared to a linear trend. However, it may still be prudent to eventually include a quadratic time trend in the mean field as the time span of the Argo observations grows in order to capture a potential accelerating or decelerating warming trend.\n\nThe large difference in the estimated OHC trends depending on the mean field modeling choices raises the question of which of these estimates is best supported by the data. We can answer this question by performing a cross-validation study comparing the different models. Figure~\\ref{fig:OHC_val_trend_CV_midocean} shows time series of monthly median cross-validation prediction errors. For brevity, we only show the midocean results; the upper ocean results are shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:OHC_val_trend_CV_upper_ocean} in the appendix and yield similar conclusions as the midocean results. The upper two panels show the LOOO median prediction errors, while the lower two panels show the LOFO median prediction errors. If the model was specified correctly, we would expect the errors to be centered on zero with no obvious patterns. However, we see that when we do not include a trend in the mean field (blue), there is a positive trend in the prediction errors regardless of whether we include time in the covariance function (left vs.~right panels) or perform LOOO or LOFO cross-validation (upper vs.~lower panels). From the sign of the prediction errors, we can conclude that the no-trend model is consistently predicting too large OHC in the early years and too small OHC in the later years, which indicates that it is underestimating the overall trend. Statistically, the no-trend model is misspecified so that the i.i.d. assumption in Eq.~\\eqref{eq:anomaly_def} does not hold and this misspecification causes the early predictions to be warm-biased and the later predictions to be cold-biased. In contrast, the models with linear or quadratic trend (black and red) do not show a trend in the prediction errors, which suggests that any trend in the observations is more adequately captured. We conclude that the models with trend included in the mean field yield more reliable estimates of the final OHC trend.\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Space-only covariance, LOOO]{\n \\includegraphics[width=6cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0cm,clip = true]{./Figures/CV/CVPredsLOOOmedianSpace_975_1850.png}}\n \\subfigure[Space-time covariance, LOOO]{\n \\includegraphics[width=6cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0cm,clip = true]{./Figures/CV/CVPredsLOOOmedianSpaceTime_975_1850.png}}\\\\\n \\subfigure[Space-only covariance, LOFO]{\n \\includegraphics[width=6cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0cm,clip = true]{./Figures/CV/CVPredsLOFOmedianSpace_975_1850.png}}\n \\subfigure[Space-time covariance, LOFO]{\n \\includegraphics[width=6cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0cm,clip = true]{./Figures/CV/CVPredsLOFOmedianSpaceTime_975_1850.png}}\\\\\n \\caption{Cross-validated monthly median prediction errors (midocean) for different modeling choices.}\n \\label{fig:OHC_val_trend_CV_midocean}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\subsection{Effect of anomaly mapping method}\n\\label{sec:val_covariance}\n\nIn this section, we explore the effect of including time in the covariance function on the mapped OHC anomalies using the same model variants as in Section~\\ref{sec:validation}\\ref{sec:val_mean_field}. In that section, we saw that the effect of including time is negligible on the estimated long-term global OHC trend, but we will now see that it makes a big difference on the mapped monthly anomalies. Figure~\\ref{fig:OHC_val_cov_upper_ocean} shows the mapped global OHC anomalies (with trend and seasonal cycle removed; normalized to the area of the Argo-sampled global ocean) for the different mean field trend (no trend, linear, or quadratic) and covariance function (space-time or space only) modeling choices. We see that all the models produce anomaly estimates with similar overall patterns and magnitudes, but the space-time models (blue, green, red) seem to produce smoother estimates across time with fewer spurious fluctuations compared to their space-only counterparts (cyan, yellow-green, pink). The lag-1 autocorrelations (bottom right insets) are also noticeably higher in the space-time models, indicating that the dependence between months may be better resolved. The RG-like model, which is a space-only model, also has lag-1 autocorrelation comparable to our locally stationary space-only models.\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Upper ocean]{\n \\includegraphics[width=8cm, trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0cm, clip = true]{./Figures/OHCA_autocorr/intTempAnomaly_15_975_2004_2022_Global.png}}\n \\subfigure[Midocean]{\n \\includegraphics[width=8cm, trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0cm, clip = true]{./Figures/OHCA_autocorr/intTempAnomaly_975_1850_2004_2022_Global.png}}\n \\caption{OHC anomalies for different modeling choices. The insets show the estimated lag-1 autocorrelations.}\n \\label{fig:OHC_val_cov_upper_ocean}\n\\end{figure}\n\nAs before, we can use cross-validation to study whether the space-time models actually resolve the OHC anomaly signal better than the space-only models. The upper ocean cross-validation results are shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:OHC_val_cov_CV_upper_ocean}, while the midocean results are in Figure~\\ref{fig:OHC_val_cov_CV_midocean} in the appendix. When we examine the LOOO cross-validation results, we see that the space-time models (solid lines) consistently produce smaller median absolute prediction errors than their space-only counterparts (dashed lines) in both the upper ocean and midocean. We observe a similar but less pronounced pattern in the LOFO cross-validation study. These results confirm that the space-time models are indeed able to resolve the OHC anomaly signal better. Given the interpretation for the two cross-validation schemes discussed at the beginning of this section, the difference between the LOOO and LOFO results indicates that the improvement from the space-time model is especially pronounced at smaller spatio-temporal scales.\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Upper ocean, LOOO]{\n \\includegraphics[width=8cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0cm,clip = true]{./Figures/CV/CVPredsLOOOMdAE_15_975.png}}\n \\subfigure[Upper ocean, LOFO]{\n \\includegraphics[width=8cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0cm,clip = true]{./Figures/CV/CVPredsLOFOMdAE_15_975.png}}\n \\caption{Cross-validated monthly median absolute prediction errors (upper ocean) for different modeling choices.}\n \\label{fig:OHC_val_cov_CV_upper_ocean}\n\\end{figure}\n\nOverall, the above OHC trend and anomaly estimates together with the cross-validation results suggest that the best models out of those considered are the models with a trend in the mean field and time in the covariance function. Since we do not observe large differences between the linear and quadratic trend models, we will focus on the linear trend model for simplicity and will use the space-time variant of that model to produce the remaining results discussed in this work. For completeness, the covariance parameter estimates for this model are shown in Appendix~\\ref{sec:covParamPlots}.\n\n\\subsection{Validation of local conditional simulations}\n\\label{sec:val_UQ}\n\nFinally, we perform a cross-validation study to compare the modeled and observed conditional dependencies at different spatial and temporal lags. Since we aim to validate the modeled spatio-temporal dependence, we will perform the cross-validation study by leaving out \\emph{pairs} of floats. Our goal is then to show that across a population of left-out pairs, stratified by spatial and temporal separation, the conditionally simulated dependence matches the observed dependence.\n\nLet us first define a temporal lag $\\Delta t$ in months and a spatial distance bin $\\mathcal{B} = [\\Delta d -0.5,\\Delta d+0.5)$, where $\\Delta d$ is a spatial lag in degrees. For a given year $i$ and for each $\\Delta t$ and $\\mathcal{B}$, we consider up to 120,000 (constraint imposed due to computational limitations) vertically integrated temperature profile pairs $(\\widetilde{\\OHC}(x_1,y_1,t_1),\\widetilde{\\OHC}(x_2,y_2,t_2))$ with temporal lag $|t^*_2-t^*_1|=\\Delta t$, where $t^*_i$ is the closest temporal grid point to $t_i$, and spatial lag $\\sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}$ in $\\mathcal{B}$. For each pair of observations, let $(f_1,f_2)$ be the corresponding float IDs and $(x^*_1,y^*_1)$ and $(x^*_2,y^*_2)$ the closest spatial grid points. We then exclude all profiles with float ID $f_1$ or $f_2$, produce a spatio-temporal conditional simulation realization and extract from it the simulated pair $(\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{\\text{sim}{,-(f_1,f_2)}}(x^*_1,y^*_1,t^*_1),\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{\\text{sim}{,-(f_1,f_2)}}(x^*_2,y^*_2,t^*_2))$. In addition, we store the corresponding Gaussian process predictions $\\widehat{\\widetilde{\\OHC}}_{-(f_1,f_2)}(x^*_1,y^*_1,t^*_1)$ and $\\widehat{\\widetilde{\\OHC}}_{-(f_1,f_2)}(x^*_2,y^*_2,t^*_2)$ and predictive variances $\\sigma^2_{-(f_1,f_2)}(x^*_1,y^*_1,t^*_1)$ and $\\sigma^2_{-(f_1,f_2)}(x^*_2,y^*_2,t^*_2)$. We use these to standardize the marginal distributions, which vary from pair to pair. Then, if the spatio-temporal model is correctly specified, the conditionally simulated standardized pair\n\\begin{small}\n\\begin{equation}\n \\left(\\frac{\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{\\text{sim}{,-(f_1,f_2)}}(x^*_1,y^*_1,t^*_1)-\\widehat{\\widetilde{\\OHC}}_{-(f_1,f_2)}(x^*_1,y^*_1,t^*_1)}{\\sigma_{-(f_1,f_2)}(x^*_1,y^*_1,t^*_1)},\\frac{\\widetilde{\\OHC}_{\\text{sim}{,-(f_1,f_2)}}(x^*_2,y^*_2,t^*_2)-\\widehat{\\widetilde{\\OHC}}_{-(f_1,f_2)}(x^*_2,y^*_2,t^*_2)}{\\sigma_{-(f_1,f_2)}(x^*_2,y^*_2,t^*_2)}\\right)\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{small}\nand the observed standardized pair\n\\begin{small}\n\\begin{equation}\n \\left(\\frac{\\widetilde{\\OHC}(x^*_1,y^*_1,t^*_1)-\\widehat{\\widetilde{\\OHC}}_{-(f_1,f_2)}(x^*_1,y^*_1,t^*_1)}{\\sigma_{-(f_1,f_2)}(x^*_1,y^*_1,t^*_1)},\\frac{\\widetilde{\\OHC}(x^*_2,y^*_2,t^*_2)-\\widehat{\\widetilde{\\OHC}}_{-(f_1,f_2)}(x^*_2,y^*_2,t^*_2)}{\\sigma_{-(f_1,f_2)}(x^*_2,y^*_2,t^*_2)}\\right)\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{small}should both follow the bivariate Gaussian distribution with standard Gaussian margins and common correlation $\\rho_{-(f_1,f_2)}(x^*_1,y^*_1,t^*_1,x^*_2,y^*_2,t^*_2)$. For all pairs\nin $\\mathcal{B}$ with temporal lag $\\Delta t$, we then compute the empirical Pearson correlation coefficient across the standardized conditionally simulated pairs and the standardized observed pairs to validate that the two correlations match in aggregate.\n\nFigure~\\ref{fig:OHC_val_CV_cond_sim} shows the cross-validation results for year 2005, where $\\Delta t=0,1,2$ months and $\\Delta d$ ranges from 0.5 to 4.5 degrees in 1-degree increments. We observe that the modeled correlation is in broad agreement with the observed correlation. Pairs that are close in space and time are more strongly correlated than more distant pairs with remarkably similar magnitude and shape for the modeled and observed correlation curves, especially for the upper ocean section. In a more careful inspection, we observe that the model seems to slightly underestimate the conditional dependence, especially for the midocean and longer time lags (blue and red curves in the right panel). This shows that even though the model seems to broadly capture the conditional dependence structure well, there is room for future improvement in the spatio-temporal structure of the model, perhaps in terms of how space and time interact in the covariance function.\n\nFor completeness, we also provide in Figure~\\ref{fig:OHC_val_cond_sim} in the appendix the non-cross-validated empirical correlations for the conditional simulation ensembles computed using a similar binned spatio-temporal aggregation approach, but with the bins defined by the native spatio-temporal grid of the simulations.\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Upper ocean]{\n \\includegraphics[width=8cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0.5cm,clip = true]{./Figures/CV/intTempCVPredsLocalCondSimCorrLOFOSpaceTimeTrend15_975_2005_2005_2_all.png}}\n \\subfigure[Midocean]{\n \\includegraphics[width=8cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0.5cm,clip = true]{./Figures/CV/intTempCVPredsLocalCondSimCorrLOFOSpaceTimeTrend975_1850_2005_2005_2_all.png}}\n \\caption{Cross-validation for spatio-temporal conditional dependence. The solid lines show the observed correlation while the dashed lines show the conditionally simulated modeled correlation.}\n \\label{fig:OHC_val_CV_cond_sim}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\section{Example applications for ocean heat content estimates with uncertainties}\n\\label{sec:OHC_product}\nIn this section, we use the mapping pipeline described in Section~\\ref{sec:method} to demonstrate novel or improved mapping uncertainty quantification capabilities enabled by conditional simulation. That is, we use the conditional simulation ensembles of the OHC fields as a starting point to obtain uncertainties for other derived quantities, e.g., OHC trend, ocean heat uptake and correlation of the OHC anomalies with ENSO. The common feature of these examples is that rigorous mapping uncertainty quantification for the final quantity of interest requires accounting for the spatial and temporal dependence in the OHC mapping uncertainties, a unique capability enabled by our conditional simulation approach.\n\n\\subsection{Global ocean heat content trend}\nGiven the importance of estimating long-term changes in global OHC for the quantification of the EEI absolute magnitude, the estimate of the trend in global OHC has been the subject of a number of intercomparison studies (e.g., \\cite{Hakuba2024}, \\cite{von_Schuckmann2023}). Here, we estimate that, during 2004--2022, OHC (i.e., $\\OHC_{15}^{975}(t) + \\OHC_{975}^{1850}(t)$) increased at a rate of $1.114$ W/m$^2$ with 95\\% uncertainty interval $[1.066,1.162]$ W/m$^2$ (Figure~\\ref{fig:OHC_trend_sum}; expressed as a flux relative to the area of the Argo-sampled global ocean; with Figures~\\ref{fig:OHC_trend_upper_ocean} and \\ref{fig:OHC_trend_midocean} in the appendix showing the corresponding time series and trends for the individual vertical sections). To obtain the uncertainty on the trend, we first fit a linear regression with monthly factors for the seasonal cycle to each conditional simulation ensemble member in each vertical section. Similar to the conservative estimate in Eq.~\\eqref{eq:UQ_UB}, the conservatively estimated standard error of the total trend is the sum, across the vertical sections, of the sample standard errors of the trend ensemble members. We note that this uncertainty estimate for the global OHC trend would not have been possible to obtain without accounting for the time dependence in the conditional simulation ensembles.\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\noindent\\includegraphics[width=10cm,angle=0]{./Figures/OHC_trends/intTempFullField_Sum_2004_2022_Global_500.png}\\\\\n \\caption{Total global OHC (15--1850 dbar) time series with fitted trend. The shaded regions show 68\\% (dark gray) and 95\\% (light gray) uncertainties obtained using the conditional simulation ensembles. The fitted trend and its 68\\% uncertainty are $1.114 \\pm 0.024$ W/m$^2$. }\\label{fig:OHC_trend_sum}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Global ocean heat content anomalies}\nThe time series of global OHC (deseasonalized, detrended) anomalies with uncertainties shows how uncertainties are overall larger in the earlier years (Figure~\\ref{fig:OHCA_sum}; normalized to the area of the Argo-sampled global ocean), which is expected given the smaller number of floats (the uncertainty reduces in time as more profiles are available and more regions are observed). While most of the monthly anomalies are not significantly different from zero (i.e., the gray shading in Figure~\\ref{fig:OHCA_sum}(a) often intersects zero), a clearer picture of the overall interannual variability emerges when we examine moving averages (i.e., when we create low-pass filtered time series; Figures~\\ref{fig:OHCA_sum}(b)--(d)). In this case, we can confirm that, e.g., the negative anomaly that follows the 2016 El Ni\\~no event (seen previously in, e.g., \\cite{Hakuba2024}) is highly statistically significant. Like the OHC trend uncertainties, we can obtain the OHC anomaly moving average uncertainties by first computing the moving average time series for each conditional simulation ensemble member in each vertical section before summing, across the vertical sections, the monthly standard errors. OHC anomaly time series for the two vertical sections separately are given in Figures~\\ref{fig:OHCA_upper_ocean} and \\ref{fig:OHCA_midocean} in the appendix.\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Monthly]{\n \\includegraphics[width=6cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0.2cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHCA_autocorr/intTempAnomaly_Sum_2004_2022_Global_500.png}}\n \\subfigure[12-month moving average]{\n \\includegraphics[width=6cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0.2cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHCA_autocorr/intTempOHCSpaceTimemovmean12_Sum_2004_2022_Global.png}}\\\\\n \\subfigure[24-month moving average]{\n \\includegraphics[width=6cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0.2cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHCA_autocorr/intTempOHCSpaceTimemovmean24_Sum_2004_2022_Global.png}}\n \\subfigure[36-month moving average]{\n \\includegraphics[width=6cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0.2cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHCA_autocorr/intTempOHCSpaceTimemovmean36_Sum_2004_2022_Global.png}}\\\\\n \\caption{Total global OHC (15--1850 dbar) anomaly time series with 68\\% (dark gray) and 95\\% (light gray) uncertainties obtained using the conditional simulation ensembles.}\n \\label{fig:OHCA_sum}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Ocean heat uptake anomalies}\n\nAnother related quantity of interest is the ocean heat uptake (OHU), which is defined as the time derivative of OHC, $\\text{OHU}(t) = \\mathrm{d}/\\mathrm{d}t \\; \\text{OHC}(t)$, and provides a measure of the rate of change in OHC. Since changes in OHC are ultimately driven by changes in top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative imbalance, OHU is often compared with TOA net flux observations (e.g., \\cite{Johnson2016}). In Figure~\\ref{fig:ohu-vs-ceres}, we plot our OHU anomaly estimates (converted to a flux relative to the area of the Earth and with the intercept and seasonal cycle removed) with uncertainties alongside CERES satellite TOA net flux anomalies from the EBAF-TOA 4.2 data product (\\cite{Loeb2018}, \\cite{Kato2018}). We approximate OHU using the first differences of the monthly OHC time series for 15--1850 dbar and obtain the uncertainties by taking the first differences of the OHC conditional simulation ensemble members for each vertical section and summing the monthly standard errors. While it is hard to discern a signal from the monthly estimates (Figure \\ref{fig:ohu-vs-ceres}(a)) due to noise, we can see slight positive trends in both the OHU estimate and TOA net flux after applying a moving average low-pass filter (Figures~\\ref{fig:ohu-vs-ceres}(b)--(d)). As described by other authors \\citep{Storto_and_Yang2024}, the high-frequency variability in observed TOA fluxes differs from that in OHU-based estimates. As an example the statistically significant drop in the Argo-resolved OHU in 2015--16 does not appear in the CERES observations, as also shown in \\cite{Trenberth_etal2022}. Differences between OHU and CERES observations start decreasing when a 36-month moving average is applied, consistent with the climate community’s increasing focus on comparing these complementary datasets at timescales longer than about three years \\citep{Storto_etal2022,Marti_etal2022,meyssignac_etal2023}.\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Monthly]{\n \\includegraphics[width=6cm,trim = 0.5cm 0.5cm 1cm 0.5cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHU/intTempOHU_Sum_2004_2022_areaEarth_500.png}}\n \\subfigure[12-month moving average]{\n \\includegraphics[width=6cm,trim = 0.5cm 0.5cm 1cm 0.5cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHU/intTempOHUSpaceTimemovmean12_Sum_2004_2022_areaEarth_500.png}}\\\\\n \\subfigure[24-month moving average]{\n \\includegraphics[width=6cm,trim = 0.5cm 0.5cm 1cm 0.5cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHU/intTempOHUSpaceTimemovmean24_Sum_2004_2022_areaEarth_500.png}}\n \\subfigure[36-month moving average]{\n \\includegraphics[width=6cm,trim = 0.5cm 0.5cm 1cm 0.5cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHU/intTempOHUSpaceTimemovmean36_Sum_2004_2022_areaEarth_500.png}}\\\\\n \\caption{Ocean heat uptake (15--1850 dbar) anomalies with 68\\% (dark gray) and 95\\% (light gray) uncertainties compared with CERES TOA radiative net flux anomalies.}\\label{fig:ohu-vs-ceres}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Gridded OHC maps}\n\nSo far, we have only shown estimates and uncertainties for the globally integrated OHC and related quantities. However, our mapping pipeline and conditional simulation algorithm also make it possible to obtain maps and uncertainties at regional scales. This enables inferring more localized climatological signals and ocean dynamics. For example, in Figure~\\ref{fig:ohc-sigprop}, we show regionally the fraction of statistically significant monthly OHC anomalies (15-1850 dbar) at the 5\\% significance level between 2004--2022. We define the uncertainties for each grid point by computing the conservative standard error as in Eq.~\\eqref{eq:UQ_UB} using the conditional simulation ensemble members. Examining the regional variation, we can see that regions near the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) and western boundary currents have the largest number of significant months (e.g., the Kuroshio Current region with more than 60\\% significant months), while the equatorial region has a moderate number of significant months (around 30\\% for the Pacific and less for the Atlantic and Indian Oceans).\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\noindent\\includegraphics[width=10cm, trim=1.5cm 2.5cm 1cm 2cm, clip=true]{./Figures/OHC_trends/intTempPixelAnomaly_Sum_2004_2022_500.png}\\\\\n \\caption{Proportion of statistically significant monthly OHC anomalies (15--1850 dbar; 5\\% level).}\\label{fig:ohc-sigprop}\n\\end{figure}\n\nLikewise, we plot a gridded map of statistically significant OHC linear trends (expressed as a heat flux) in Figure~\\ref{fig:OHC_trend_map}. While the majority of the significant trends are warming trends---we estimate that the Kuroshio Current, Gulf Stream and ACC regions are warming particularly fast (dark red)---there are also sizable cooling trends off the coast of Japan and in the North Atlantic (dark blue). These patterns are broadly consistent with other recent OHC trend maps (e.g., \\cite{Johnson2020,li_etal2023}).\n\nFigure~\\ref{fig:OHC_zonal_trends} shows the contribution to the global OHC trend by latitude with uncertainties (normalized to the Argo-sampled ocean area of each latitude band). Consistent with previous studies \\citep[e.g.,][]{Trenberth2025}, most latitudes are warming on average, with the regions near $40^\\circ$N and $40^\\circ$S making the greatest contribution to the global trend. We also observe that the Southern Hemisphere trend appears to be more uncertain, which might be explained by the greater number of Argo profiles in the Northern Hemisphere. We note that providing a zonally averaged uncertainty requires accounting for the spatial dependence in the mapping uncertainties, which our conditional simulation approach allows us to do.\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Significant trends (5\\% level)]{\\includegraphics[height=5cm,trim = 1.5cm 2.1cm 0.8cm 2cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHC_trends/intTempOHCTrendSum_2004_2022_pixelwise_masked_500.png} \\label{fig:OHC_trend_map}}\n \\subfigure[Zonal trends]{\\includegraphics[height=5cm, trim = 0 0.5cm 0 0.5cm clip = true]{./Figures/OHC_trends/intTempFullField_Sum_2004_2022_zonal_500.png} \\label{fig:OHC_zonal_trends}}\\\\\n \\caption{Regional OHC trends (15--1850 dbar). Figure~\\subref{fig:OHC_trend_map}: Significant OHC linear trends at 5\\% significance level. Figure~\\subref{fig:OHC_zonal_trends}: Zonal OHC trends with 68\\% (dark gray) and 95\\% (light gray) uncertainties.}\\label{fig:ohc-trend-pixelwise}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Regional time series}\n\nIn addition to examining regional patterns through gridded maps, we also plot OHC anomaly time series with uncertainties averaged over a few regions of interest. We first show the OHC anomaly time series (with trend and seasonal cycle removed) for the Ni\\~{n}o~3.4 region ($5^\\circ$N--$5^\\circ$S, $120^\\circ$W--$170^\\circ$W) in Figure~\\ref{fig:ohc-vs-oni}. The Oceanic Ni\\~{n}o Index (ONI) is a measure used for classifying whether the El Ni\\~{n}o Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phenomenon is present in a given month by examining whether the sea surface temperature (SST) exceeds a certain threshold in the Ni\\~{n}o~3.4 region (\\cite{ONI}). We overlay the monthly input to the ONI index (i.e., the monthly ERSST.v5 SST anomalies) in magenta in Figure~\\ref{fig:ohc-vs-oni}. While OHC is a subsurface integral and SST is a surface measurement, the two time series match well, particularly between 2006--2013, reflecting the large contribution of the shallower layers to the OHC anomaly within 15--1850~dbar and giving us further confidence in our mapping pipeline. Overall, the relative size of the uncertainties is smaller than for the global OHC time series (Figure~\\ref{fig:OHCA_sum}), which means that the OHC anomaly time series is resolved well in this particular region, consistent with the large number of Argo observations and long spatial decorrelation scales (Figures~\\ref{fig:length_scales_upper_ocean} \\& \\ref{fig:length_scales_midocean}) in the region.\n\nAs another regional example, the OHC anomaly time series in Figure~\\ref{fig:ohca-blob} for a region in the Northeast Pacific (specifically $40^\\circ$N--$50^\\circ$N, $135^\\circ$W--$150^\\circ$W) shows the signature of an intense marine heatwave event during 2013--2016 (\\cite{Bond2015}; reflected here as the statistically significant positive anomalies during most of those years). This marine heatwave event contributed to drought conditions on the North American West Coast (e.g., \\cite{Seager2015}) and had impacts on the biogeochemistry of the ocean due to both changes in temperature and ocean circulation (\\cite{Mogen2022}). Notice that the time series in the Northeast Pacific has less high-frequency variation than the Ni\\~{n}o 3.4 time series, which is due to the large difference in the estimated temporal decorrelation scales between the two regions (Figures~\\ref{fig:length_scales_upper_ocean} \\& \\ref{fig:length_scales_midocean}).\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Ni\\~{n}o~3.4]{\n \\includegraphics[width=8cm,angle=0]{./Figures/OHCA_autocorr/intTempAnomalyONI3month_Sum_2004_2022_nino34.png}\\label{fig:ohc-vs-oni}}\n \\subfigure[Northeast Pacific]{\n \\includegraphics[width=8cm,angle=0]{./Figures/OHCA_autocorr/intTempAnomaly_Sum_2004_2022_blob_500.png}\\label{fig:ohca-blob}}\n \\caption{Regional monthly OHC (15--1850 dbar) anomaly time series (normalized to the area of each region) with 68\\% (dark gray) and 95\\% (light gray) uncertainties. Figure~\\subref{fig:ohc-vs-oni}: OHC in the Ni\\~{n}o~3.4 region (black) vs.~the monthly SST input to the ONI index (magenta). Figure~\\subref{fig:ohca-blob}: OHC in the Northeast Pacific region ($40^\\circ$N--$50^\\circ$N, $135^\\circ$W--$150^\\circ$W).}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{OHC and ENSO cross-correlation} \\label{sec:OHC_ENSO_ccf}\n\nOur final example application demonstrates that the conditional simulation ensembles can be used to obtain predictions and uncertainties for arbitrarily complex downstream quantities that depend on the OHC estimates. Specifically, we will consider the empirical cross-correlation between the global OHC anomalies (OHCA) and the SST input to the ONI index. The cross-correlation can be understood as a transformation $T$ of the OHCA time series, $\\mathbf{OHCA} = (\\text{OHCA}(t_1),\\ldots,\\text{OHCA}(t_n))$. So far, all the transformations we have considered have been linear, so the conditional expectation satisfies $\\mathbb{E}(T(\\mathbf{OHCA}) | \\mathrm{data}) = T(\\mathbb{E}(\\mathbf{OHCA} | \\mathrm{data}))$. In other words, we can simply transform the GP prediction and this gives us the best prediction of the transformed quantity. However, when $T$ is nonlinear, as is the case for cross-correlation, we need to keep track of the entire predictive distribution $p(T(\\mathbf{OHCA}) | \\mathrm{data})$ and use its expectation and quantiles for inference. This is easy to do using the conditional simulations. As for the other examples before, we apply $T$ on each ensemble member: this gives us a sample from $p(T(\\mathbf{OHCA}) | \\mathrm{data})$, which we can use to estimate the derived quantity of interest (as the mean across ensembles) and related uncertainties (based on quantiles across ensemble members).\n\nIn Figure~\\ref{fig:ohc-vs-oni-ccf}, we show the cross-correlation between the global upper ocean (15--975 dbar) monthly OHC anomalies and the monthly input SST to the ONI index with 68\\% and 95\\% uncertainty intervals. The estimated cross-correlation is obtained as the mean of the cross-correlation predictive distribution and the uncertainties are defined using the appropriate quantiles of the predictive distribution. We also show the naive estimate $T(\\mathbb{E}(\\mathbf{OHCA} | \\mathrm{data}))$ to illustrate that it is markedly different from the best prediction $\\mathbb{E}(T(\\mathbf{OHCA}) | \\mathrm{data})$. The strongest cross-correlation magnitude is found around lags -5 and +10 months, which are both statistically significant. This implies that, with moderate positive correlation, global OHC anomalies, as observed by Argo, lead ENSO by approximately 5 months. This observation is consistent with the accumulation of heat in the Western Pacific in advance of El Ni\\~{n}o events (\\cite{McPhaden2012}, \\cite{Cheng_etal2019}).\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\noindent\\includegraphics[width=10cm, trim = 0.5cm 0 1cm 0.5cm, clip=true]{./Figures/ENSO/intTempONICCF15_975_2004_2022_Global_500.png}\\\\\n \\caption{Cross-correlation between global upper ocean (15--975 dbar) monthly OHC and Ni\\~{n}o 3.4 region SST with 68\\% and 95\\% uncertainties. A naive cross-correlation estimate that ignores nonlinearity is also shown for reference.}\\label{fig:ohc-vs-oni-ccf}\n\\end{figure}\n\nSince in this work we do not model the dependence between the vertical sections, we only report here the cross-correlation and its uncertainties for the upper ocean section. Unlike the previous quantities, the total cross-correlation cannot be expressed as a sum of the two sections, so one cannot directly obtain its best prediction or use the conservative upper bound in Eq.~\\eqref{eq:UQ_UB} for uncertainty quantification. A future improvement will involve modeling the vertical dependence to produce estimates and uncertainties for the cross-correlation between the full 15--1850~dbar OHC anomalies and ENSO.\n\n\\section{Discussion and conclusions}\n\\label{sec:discussion}\n\nWe introduced a new mapping and uncertainty quantification framework for estimating ocean heat content from Argo observations. Based on the mapping foundation in \\cite{Kuusela2018}, we used fully data-driven decorrelation scales and variances in a locally stationary spatio-temporal Gaussian process model to map OHC. We developed a principled and flexible uncertainty quantification method through local conditional simulation ensembles that incorporates dependence in space and time into the uncertainties for not only OHC but also related downstream quantities. We used cross-validation to validate the modeling choices and uncertainties. We implemented this mapping pipeline in an open-source, modular codebase that enables full reproducibility of the results. We used the pipeline to produce OHC maps for 2004--2022 and demonstrated the resulting estimates and uncertainties for the global OHC trend and anomalies, OHU, regional OHC estimates and cross-correlation between OHC anomalies and ENSO. A data product using this pipeline \\citep[LocalGP]{Giglio_etal2026_Zenodo} has already contributed to several climate assessments, oceanographic studies, and OHC intercomparison efforts and will enable new regional analyses and principled uncertainty quantification in future studies of OHC and EEI.\n\nThere are several potential avenues for future improvements to this mapping framework:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item In this work, we used plug-in estimates of the mean field and the GP parameters. Both of these estimates are considered fixed when quantifying the uncertainty of the mapped fields so the final uncertainties do not account for the uncertainty of these estimates. One future direction would be to explore ways of propagating these sources of uncertainty into the final uncertainties.\n \\item Throughout this work, we reported conservative estimates of the uncertainties for quantities involving the sum of the vertical sections. In ongoing follow-up work, we seek to improve the total OHC uncertainties by modeling the dependence between the vertical sections using a bivariate locally stationary Gaussian process, which can also improve the mapped anomalies since the sparsely sampled midocean can borrow strength from the more densely sampled upper ocean.\n \\item We saw in Section~\\ref{sec:validation}\\ref{sec:val_UQ} that in our current model there is some amount of unmodeled conditional dependence at longer time scales. A potential direction for future research could be to change how space and time interact in the covariance function through more general space-time covariance classes \\citep{Porcu2021}, including asymmetric covariances \\citep{ma2025asymmetric} and neural network covariances \\citep{Wilson2016}.\n \\item \\cite{Park2023} introduced a bias correction for the mean field and a way to jointly estimate the mean field and covariance parameters within the locally stationary modeling framework. These are both improvements that could be incorporated into future versions of the OHC mapping pipeline.\n \\item In this work, we divided the ocean into two vertical sections. While this is sufficient to demonstrate our framework for the vertically integrated OHC, it only allows to use profiles that fully cover at least one of the layers considered (e.g., profiles shallower than 975~dbar are not included, which limits our ability to use in-situ observations beyond Argo). Also, understanding the vertical distribution of heat better would require finer vertical resolution in the mapping by either using more vertical layers or switching to full 4D maps by adding the vertical dimension to the covariance model. In addition to the resulting modeling challenges, a major challenge with this extension would be the computational cost associated with producing the maps. Recent advances in amortized neural inference for spatial models \\citep{Gerber2021, Lenzi2023, SainsburyDale2024, SainsburyDale2025, Walchessen2024, Walchessen2025} are likely to provide a path forward in this setting.\n \\item \\cite{Lyman2023} showed that remotely sensed sea surface height (SSH) and sea surface temperature (SST) contain useful information for mapping the subsurface ocean heat content. Their mapping approach is based on a random forest regression method. In future work, it would be interesting to consider how to incorporate SSH/SST observations into a spatio-temporal Gaussian process model, which might provide benefits over random forests in terms of model interpretability and uncertainty quantification. Here again, a major challenge with this extension would be the computational cost, as satellite data are available at a much higher spatio-temporal sampling resolution than in-situ data.\n\\end{itemize}\n\nIn addition to improvements to the mapping methodology, another important direction for future work is to build on previous OHC intercomparison efforts, such as \\cite{von_Schuckmann2023, Hakuba2024}, to better understand how the different modeling and data analysis choices contribute to the differences across OHC products. % \\citep[e.g. within the framework of ][]{ME4OH}\nOur validation studies in Section~\\ref{sec:validation} provide indications that could explain some of the differences. Specifically, consistent with \\cite{Cheng2015}, our results indicate that the handling of the climatological trend in the mean field can have a significant impact on the estimated OHC trend. Additionally, we showed that the details of the spatio-temporal modeling can significantly impact the estimated temporal and spatial variation. While new assessments of mapping methods are ongoing \\citep[][leveraging synthetic profiles from models and the comparison of full field reconstructions with the model truth]{ME4OH}, a major open direction is a comprehensive assessment of OHC uncertainties across products, which is challenging as mapping uncertainty estimates are often not available in existing products.\n\nThe mapping and uncertainty quantification pipeline presented here is not limited to OHC and can be easily deployed to map other oceanographic variables based on Argo data and other in-situ oceanographic observations. The software framework we developed is specifically designed to be easily adaptable to mapping other oceanographic fields with uncertainties, which is a direction that we are currently actively pursuing.\n\n%\\clearpage\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% ACKNOWLEDGMENTS\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\acknowledgments TS and MK were supported by NOAA grant NA21OAR4310258. DG was supported by NOAA grant NA21OAR4310261. We would like to thank members of the CMU STAMPS Research Center and the SAMSI Statistical Oceanography Working Group, as well as participants of the GEWEX Earth Energy Imbalance Assessment Workshops, for helpful comments and feedback on this work. This work used Bridges-2 at Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center through allocation MTH230014 from the Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem: Services \\& Support (ACCESS) program, which is supported by National Science Foundation grants \\#2138259, \\#2138286, \\#2138307, \\#2137603, and \\#2138296.\n\n% Keep acknowledgments (note correct spelling: no ``e'' between the ``g'' and\n% ``m'') as brief as possible. In general, acknowledge only direct help in\n% writing or research. Financial support (e.g., grant numbers) for the work done, \n% for an author, or for the laboratory where the work was performed must be \n% acknowledged here rather than as footnotes to the title or to an author's name.\n% Contribution numbers (if the work has been published by the author's institution \n% or organization) should be placed in the acknowledgments rather than as \n% footnotes to the title or to an author's name.\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% \n%\n\\datastatement\n\nArgo data were collected and made freely available by the international Argo project and the national programs that contribute to it. The Argo Program is part of the Global Ocean Observing System.\nThe codebase for the mapping pipeline and case studies presented in this paper is available at \\url{https://github.com/ttsukianto/LocalGP_OHC}. The preprocessed data files, parameter estimates, OHC maps and conditional simulation ensembles produced as part of this work are available at \\url{https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18273718}.\n\n% The data availability statement is where authors should describe how the data underlying \n% the findings within the article can be accessed and reused. Authors should attempt to \n% provide unrestricted access to all data and materials underlying reported findings. \n% If data access is restricted, authors must mention this in the statement. See\n% {http://www.ametsoc.org/PubsDataPolicy} for more info.\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% APPENDIXES\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%\n%% If only one appendix, use\n\n\\clearpage\n\n\\appendix\n\n%% If more than one appendix, use \\appendix[<letter>], e.g.,\n\n%\\appendix[A] \n\n%% Appendix title is necessary! For appendix title:\n\n%\\appendixtitle{Title of Appendix}\n\n%%% Appendix section numbering (note, skip \\section and begin with \\subsection)\n%\n\\subsection{Estimated covariance parameters} \\label{sec:covParamPlots}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Latitude]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 3cm,clip = true]{./Figures/MLE/SpaceTime_thetaLat_Trend_15_975_.png}}\n \\subfigure[Longitude]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 3cm,clip = true]{./Figures/MLE/SpaceTime_thetaLon_Trend_15_975_.png}}\n \\subfigure[Longitude vs.~latitude]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 3cm,clip = true]{./Figures/MLE/SpaceTime_thetaLonVsThetaLat_Trend_15_975_.png}}\n \\subfigure[Time]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 3cm,clip = true]{./Figures/MLE/thetat_Trend_15_975_.png}}\n \\caption{Space-time model length scale parameter estimates for the upper ocean section.}\n \\label{fig:length_scales_upper_ocean}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\vspace{1cm}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Latitude]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 3cm,clip = true]{./Figures/MLE/SpaceTime_thetaLat_Trend_975_1850_.png}}\n \\subfigure[Longitude]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 3cm,clip = true]{./Figures/MLE/SpaceTime_thetaLon_Trend_975_1850_.png}}\n \\subfigure[Longitude vs.~latitude]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 3cm,clip = true]{./Figures/MLE/SpaceTime_thetaLonVsThetaLat_Trend_975_1850_.png}}\n \\subfigure[Time]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 3cm,clip = true]{./Figures/MLE/thetat_Trend_975_1850_.png}}\n \\caption{Space-time model length scale parameter estimates for the midocean section.}\n \\label{fig:length_scales_midocean}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Log field variance]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 3cm,clip = true]{./Figures/MLE/SpaceTime_thetas_Trend_15_975_.png}}\n \\subfigure[Log nugget variance]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 3cm,clip = true]{./Figures/MLE/SpaceTime_sigma2_Trend_15_975_log.png}}\\\\\n \\subfigure[Log total variance]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 3cm,clip = true]{./Figures/MLE/SpaceTime_thetasPlusSigma2Trend_15_975_.png}}\n \\subfigure[Nugget variance vs.~total variance]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 3cm,clip = true]{./Figures/MLE/SpaceTime_Sigma2VsThetasSigma2_Trend_15_975_.png}}\\\\\n \\caption{Space-time model field and nugget variance estimates for the upper ocean section.}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Log field variance]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 3cm,clip = true]{./Figures/MLE/SpaceTime_thetas_Trend_975_1850_.png}}\n \\subfigure[Log nugget variance]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 3cm,clip = true]{./Figures/MLE/SpaceTime_sigma2_Trend_975_1850_log.png}}\\\\\n \\subfigure[Log total variance]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 3cm,clip = true]{./Figures/MLE/SpaceTime_thetasPlusSigma2Trend_975_1850_.png}}\n \\subfigure[Nugget variance vs.~total variance]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 3cm,clip = true]{./Figures/MLE/SpaceTime_Sigma2VsThetasSigma2_Trend_975_1850_v2.png}}\\\\\n \\caption{Space-time model field and nugget variance estimates for the midocean section.}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\clearpage\n\n\\subsection{Mapped anomalies and conditional simulations} \\label{sec:condSimExamples}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Mapped anomalies]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 2.5cm,clip = true]{./Figures/Anomalies/intTempAnomalySpaceTimeTrend_15_975_02_2010.png}}\n \\subfigure[Conditional simulation realization \\#1]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 2.5cm,clip = true]{./Figures/Conditional_simulations/intTempLocalCondSimCovGPPlusNuggetSpaceTimeTrend_15_975_02_2010_50.png}}\\\\\n \\subfigure[Conditional simulation realization \\#2]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 2.5cm,clip = true]{./Figures/Conditional_simulations/intTempLocalCondSimCovGPPlusNuggetSpaceTimeTrend_15_975_02_2010_100.png}}\n \\subfigure[Conditional simulation realization \\#3]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 2.5cm,clip = true]{./Figures/Conditional_simulations/intTempLocalCondSimCovGPPlusNuggetSpaceTimeTrend_15_975_02_2010_150.png}}\\\\\n \\caption{Mapped upper ocean OHC anomaly and example conditional simulation realizations for February 2010.}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\vspace{1cm}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Mapped anomalies]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 2.5cm,clip = true]{./Figures/Anomalies/intTempAnomalySpaceTimeTrend_975_1850_02_2010.png}}\n \\subfigure[Conditional simulation realization \\#1]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 2.5cm,clip = true]{./Figures/Conditional_simulations/intTempLocalCondSimCovGPPlusNuggetSpaceTimeTrend_975_1850_02_2010_50.png}}\\\\\n \\subfigure[Conditional simulation realization \\#2]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 2.5cm,clip = true]{./Figures/Conditional_simulations/intTempLocalCondSimCovGPPlusNuggetSpaceTimeTrend_975_1850_02_2010_100.png}}\n \\subfigure[Conditional simulation realization \\#3]{\n \\includegraphics[width=7.5cm,trim = 1cm 3.5cm 1cm 2.5cm,clip = true]{./Figures/Conditional_simulations/intTempLocalCondSimCovGPPlusNuggetSpaceTimeTrend_975_1850_02_2010_150.png}}\\\\\n \\caption{Mapped midocean OHC anomaly and example conditional simulation realizations for February 2010.}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\clearpage\n\n\\subsection{Additional validation results}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\setcounter{subfigure}{0}\n \\subfigure[Space-only covariance, LOOO]{\n \\includegraphics[width=6cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0cm,clip = true]{./Figures/CV/CVPredsLOOOmedianSpace_15_975.png}}\n \\subfigure[Space-time covariance, LOOO]{\n \\includegraphics[width=6cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0cm,clip = true]{./Figures/CV/CVPredsLOOOmedianSpaceTime_15_975.png}}\\\\\n \\subfigure[Space-only covariance, LOFO]{\n \\includegraphics[width=6cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0cm,clip = true]{./Figures/CV/CVPredsLOFOmedianSpace_15_975.png}}\n \\subfigure[Space-time covariance, LOFO]{\n \\includegraphics[width=6cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0cm,clip = true]{./Figures/CV/CVPredsLOFOmedianSpaceTime_15_975.png}}\\\\\n \\caption{Cross-validated monthly median prediction errors (upper ocean) for different modeling choices.}\n \\label{fig:OHC_val_trend_CV_upper_ocean}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Midocean, LOOO]{\n \\includegraphics[width=8cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0cm,clip = true]{./Figures/CV/CVPredsLOOOMdAE_975_1850.png}}\n \\subfigure[Midocean, LOFO]{\n \\includegraphics[width=8cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0cm,clip = true]{./Figures/CV/CVPredsLOFOMdAE_975_1850.png}}\n \\caption{Cross-validated monthly median absolute prediction errors (midocean) for different modeling choices.}\n \\label{fig:OHC_val_cov_CV_midocean}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Upper ocean]{\n \\includegraphics[width=8cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0.5cm,clip = true]{./Figures/Conditional_simulations/intTempLocalCondSimCorrSpaceTimeTrend_15_975_2005_500.png}}\n \\subfigure[Midocean]{\n \\includegraphics[width=8cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0.5cm,clip = true]{./Figures/Conditional_simulations/intTempLocalCondSimCorrSpaceTimeTrend_975_1850_2005_500.png}}\n \\caption{Conditional simulation aggregate empirical spatio-temporal correlation functions in 2005.}\n \\label{fig:OHC_val_cond_sim}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\clearpage\n\n\\subsection{Global ocean heat content trend}\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\noindent\\includegraphics[width=10cm,angle=0]{./Figures/OHC_trends/intTempFullField_15_975_2004_2022_Global_500.png}\\\\\n \\caption{Global upper ocean OHC (15--975 dbar) time series with fitted trend. The shaded regions show 68\\% (dark gray) and 95\\% (light gray) uncertainties obtained using the conditional simulation ensemble. The fitted trend and its 68\\% uncertainty are $0.843 \\pm 0.018$ W/m$^2$.}\n \\label{fig:OHC_trend_upper_ocean}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\noindent\\includegraphics[width=10cm,angle=0]{./Figures/OHC_trends/intTempFullField_975_1850_2004_2022_Global_500.png}\\\\\n \\caption{Global midocean OHC (975--1850 dbar) time series with fitted trend. The shaded regions show 68\\% (dark gray) and 95\\% (light gray) uncertainties obtained using the conditional simulation ensemble. The fitted trend and its 68\\% uncertainty are $0.270 \\pm 0.005$ W/m$^2$.}\n \\label{fig:OHC_trend_midocean}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\clearpage\n\n\\subsection{Global ocean heat content anomalies}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Monthly]{\n \\includegraphics[width=5cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0.2cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHCA_autocorr/intTempAnomaly_15_975_2004_2022_Global_500.png}}\n \\subfigure[12-month moving average]{\n \\includegraphics[width=5cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0.2cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHCA_autocorr/intTempOHCSpaceTimemovmean12_15_975_2004_2022_Global.png}}\\\\\n \\subfigure[24-month moving average]{\n \\includegraphics[width=5cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0.2cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHCA_autocorr/intTempOHCSpaceTimemovmean24_15_975_2004_2022_Global.png}}\n \\subfigure[36-month moving average]{\n \\includegraphics[width=5cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0.2cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHCA_autocorr/intTempOHCSpaceTimemovmean36_15_975_2004_2022_Global.png}}\\\\\n \\caption{Global upper ocean OHC (15--975 dbar) anomaly time series with 68\\% (dark gray) and 95\\% (light gray) uncertainties obtained using the conditional simulation ensemble.}\n \\label{fig:OHCA_upper_ocean}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\subfigure[Monthly]{\n \\includegraphics[width=5cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0.2cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHCA_autocorr/intTempAnomaly_975_1850_2004_2022_Global_500.png}}\n \\subfigure[12-month moving average]{\n \\includegraphics[width=5cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0.2cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHCA_autocorr/intTempOHCSpaceTimemovmean12_975_1850_2004_2022_Global.png}}\\\\\n \\subfigure[24-month moving average]{\n \\includegraphics[width=5cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0.2cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHCA_autocorr/intTempOHCSpaceTimemovmean24_975_1850_2004_2022_Global.png}}\n \\subfigure[36-month moving average]{\n \\includegraphics[width=5cm,trim = 0.5cm 0cm 1cm 0.2cm,clip = true]{./Figures/OHCA_autocorr/intTempOHCSpaceTimemovmean36_975_1850_2004_2022_Global.png}}\\\\\n \\caption{Global midocean OHC (975--1850 dbar) anomaly time series with 68\\% (dark gray) and 95\\% (light gray) uncertainties obtained using the conditional simulation ensemble.}\n \\label{fig:OHCA_midocean}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\n\n% \\subsubsection{First secondary heading}\n\n% \\paragraph{First tertiary heading}\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% REFERENCES\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% Make your BibTeX bibliography by using these commands:\n\\bibliographystyle{ametsocV6}\n\\bibliography{references}\n\n\n\\end{document}\n\n================================================\nFILE: ametsocV6.1.cls\n================================================\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% Version 6.1, 1 September 2021\n% ametsocV6.1.cls\n% Article Class for >> AMS Journals <<\n% \n%\n% Copyright 2021, American Meteorological Society\n%\n% This work may be distributed and/or modified under the\n% conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3\n% of this license or (at your option) any later version.\n% The latest version of this license is in\n% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt\n% and version 1.3 or later is part of all distributions of LaTeX\n% version 2005/12/01 or later.\n%\n% This work has the LPPL maintenance status `maintained'.\n% The Current Maintainer of this work is the American Meteorological Society.\n% This work consists of the files ametsocV6.1.cls, ametsocV6.bst, amsdocsV6.1.pdf, and AMS_RefsV6.pdf.\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Options\n\n\\DeclareOption{twoside}{\\@twosidetrue \\@mparswitchtrue}\n\n\\newif\\ifdraft\n\\DeclareOption{draft}{\\global\\drafttrue\n\\renewcommand\\baselinestretch{1.75}\n\\def\\arraystretch{1.5}\n\\@twocolumnfalse\n\\setlength\\overfullrule{5pt}}\n\n\\DeclareOption{twocol}{\\setlength\\overfullrule{0pt}\n\\renewcommand\\baselinestretch{1}\n\\def\\arraystretch{1.15}\n\\brokenpenalty=5000\n\\global\\draftfalse\n\\@twocolumntrue\n}\n\n\\DeclareOption{onecolumn}{\\@twocolumnfalse}\n\\DeclareOption{twocolumn}{\\@twocolumntrue}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n%% default options declared\n\\ExecuteOptions{letterpaper,twoside,onecolumn,draft}\n\n%% This is where options used with \\documentclass[]{},\n%% ie, \\documentclass[draft]{ammetsoc}\n%% are activated:\n\n\\ProcessOptions\n\n%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Standard 10 point default settings:\n\n%% Font family settings\n\\renewcommand\\normalsize{%\n\\ifdraft\n \\@setfontsize\\normalsize{12pt}{12pt}%\n\\else\n \\@setfontsize\\normalsize{9.85pt}{11.5}%\n\\baselineskip=11.5pt plus .1pt\n\\fi\n \\abovedisplayskip 10\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus5\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus3\\p@\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 6\\p@ \\@plus3\\p@ \\@minus3\\p@\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\let\\@listi\\@listI}\n\n\n\\normalsize\n\n\\newcommand\\normaltextsize{%\n \\@setfontsize\\normaltextsize{10.5pt}{12}\n \\abovedisplayskip 10\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus5\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus3\\p@\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 6\\p@ \\@plus3\\p@ \\@minus3\\p@\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\let\\@listi\\@listI}\n\n\\newcommand\\small{%\n \\@setfontsize\\small\\@ixpt{11}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 8.5\\p@ \\@plus3\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus2\\p@\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 4\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus2\\p@\n \\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\topsep 4\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus2\\p@\n \\parsep 2\\p@ \\@plus\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\itemsep \\parsep}%\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n}\n\n\\newcommand\\bigfootnotesize{%\n \\@setfontsize\\bigfootnotesize{8.5pt}{9.5}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 6\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus\\p@\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 3\\p@ \\@plus\\p@ \\@minus2\\p@\n \\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\topsep 3\\p@ \\@plus\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\parsep 2\\p@ \\@plus\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\itemsep \\parsep}%\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n}\n\n\\newcommand\\footnotesize{%\n \\@setfontsize\\footnotesize\\@viiipt{9.5}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 6\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus\\p@\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 3\\p@ \\@plus\\p@ \\@minus2\\p@\n \\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\topsep 3\\p@ \\@plus\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\parsep 2\\p@ \\@plus\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\itemsep \\parsep}%\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n}\n\\newcommand\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize\\scriptsize\\@viipt\\@viiipt}\n\\newcommand\\bigtiny{\\@setfontsize\\bigtiny{5.5pt}\\@vipt}\n\\newcommand\\tiny{\\@setfontsize\\tiny\\@vpt\\@vipt}\n\\newcommand\\large{\\@setfontsize\\large\\@xiipt{14}}\n\\newcommand\\Large{\\@setfontsize\\Large\\@xivpt{18}}\n\\newcommand\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize\\LARGE\\@xviipt{22}}\n\\newcommand\\huge{\\@setfontsize\\huge\\@xxpt{25}}\n\\newcommand\\Huge{\\@setfontsize\\Huge\\@xxvpt{30}}\n\n%% Font commands to accomodate \n%% earlier TeX and LaTeX font conventions:\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\rm}{\\normalfont\\rmfamily}{\\mathrm}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\sf}{\\normalfont\\sffamily}{\\mathsf}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\tt}{\\normalfont\\ttfamily}{\\mathtt}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\bf}{\\normalfont\\bfseries}{\\mathbf}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\it}{\\normalfont\\itshape}{\\mathit}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\sl}{\\normalfont\\slshape}{\\@nomath\\sl}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\sc}{\\normalfont\\scshape}{\\@nomath\\sc}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand*\\cal{\\@fontswitch\\relax\\mathcal}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand*\\mit{\\@fontswitch\\relax\\mathnormal}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%%%%%% Page style settings\n \\parindent = 10pt\n \\parskip = 0\\p@ %\\@plus .0001pt\n \\textheight=9in %%\n\\advance\\textheight-12pt %this works for first page\n\\advance\\textheight-8pt\n\n\\advance\\textheight4pt\n\n\\textwidth= 39pc\n\n\\pdfpagewidth=7.87in\n\\pdfpageheight=10.5in\n\n\\setlength\\lineskip{1\\p@}\n\\setlength\\normallineskip{1\\p@}\n\n\n\\setlength\\headheight{12\\p@}\n\\setlength\\headsep {12\\p@}\n\\setlength\\topskip {10\\p@}\n\\setlength\\footskip{35\\p@}\n\n\n\\setlength\\maxdepth{.5\\topskip} \n\n%%% Running head and foot definition.\n\n\\def\\currvolume{Please supply {\\tt\\string\\volume\\string{<volume number>\\string}}}\n\\def\\currdate{Please supply {\\tt\\string\\issuedate\\string{<issue date>\\string}}}\n\\def\\volume#1{\\def\\currvolume{Volume #1}}\n\\def\\issuedate#1{\\def\\currdate{#1}}\n\\let\\currvolume\\relax\n\\let\\currdate\\relax\n\n\\def\\ps@plain{%\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\vbox{\\ifdraft\\else\\iffirstpage\\global\\firstpagefalse\n\\vtop to0pt{\\vss\n\\rlap{\\hbox to\\textwidth{\\hfill\\color{gray}\\small\nGenerated using the official AMS \\LaTeX\\ template v6.1 two-column layout. This work has been submitted for publication. \n\\\\ Copyright in this work may be transferred without further notice, and this version may no longer be accessible.\\hfill}}\n\\vskip3pt\n\\hrule width \\textwidth\n\\vskip18pt}\n\\fi\\fi\n\\ifdraft\\else\n\\vtop to 0pt{\\vss\n\\rlap{\\hbox to\\textwidth{\\footnotesize\\sc\\rlap{\\currvolume}\\hfill\n%%%\n%\\uppercase{AMS Journal Name}\n%%%\n\\hfill\n\\llap{\\currdate}}}\n\\vss}\\fi}}%\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\hbox to\\textwidth{\\rlap{\\ifdraft\\small\\else\\scriptsize\\fi\n%\\copyright \\theyear\\ \n\\ template}\\hfill\n\\normalsize\\ifdraft\\thepage\\hfill\\else\n\\thepage\\hfill\\fi}}%\n \\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n \\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty}\n\n \\def\\ps@headings{%\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\ifdraft\\centerline{\\thepage}\\else\\hfill\\fi}\n \\let\\@evenfoot\\@oddfoot\n \\def\\@evenhead{{\\ifdraft\\hfill\\else\\normalsize\\thepage\n\\bigfootnotesize\\sc\\hfill \n%\\uppercase{AMS Journal Name}\n\\hfill \\currvolume\\fi}}%\n \\def\\@oddhead{{\\ifdraft\\hfill\\else\\bigfootnotesize\\sc\\currdate\\hfill \\therunningheadauthors\\hfill \\normalsize\\thepage\n%\\currvolume\n\\fi}}%\n}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Names to be used in Bibliography, Figure and Table captions, and\n%% Appendix\n\n\\newcommand\\refname{References}\n\\newcommand\\figurename{{\\sc Fig.}}\n\\newcommand\\tablename{{\\sc Table}}\n%\\newcommand\\appendixname{Appendix}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% margin notes positioning\n\\setlength\\marginparsep {10\\p@}\n\\setlength\\marginparpush{5\\p@}\n\\setlength\\marginparwidth {48\\p@}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% needed by output routine\n\n\\setlength\\oddsidemargin {-19pt}\n\\evensidemargin\\oddsidemargin\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Footnote settings\n\n\\renewcommand\\footnoterule{%\n\\vskip11pt\n \\hrule\\@width.2\\columnwidth\n \\vskip10pt}\n\n\\newcommand\\@makefntext[1]{%\n \\parindent 1em%\n \\noindent\n \\hb@xt@1.8em{\\hss\\@makefnmark}#1}\n\n%% distance between footnotes\n\\setlength\\footnotesep{6.65\\p@}\n\n%% distance between text and baseline of first footnote\n\\setlength{\\skip\\footins}{6\\p@ \\@plus .1\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@\n}\n\n\\skip\\@mpfootins = \\skip\\footins\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% distance between figures and tables and text\n\\setlength\\floatsep {12\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\\setlength\\textfloatsep{20\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}\n\n%% Separation used when you type \\begin{figure}[h]...\\end{figure} or\n%% \\begin{table}[h]...\\end{table}\n\\setlength\\intextsep {12\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\n%% Separation used when you type \\begin{figure*}...\\end{figure*} or\n%% \\begin{table*}...\\end{table*}\n\\setlength\\dblfloatsep {12\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\n%% Separation used when you type \\begin{figure*}[h]...\\end{figure*} or\n%% \\begin{table*}[h]...\\end{table*}\n\\setlength\\dbltextfloatsep{20\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%\n%% float positioning, needed by output routine\n\\setlength\\@fptop{0\\p@ \\@plus 1fil}\n\\setlength\\@fpsep{8\\p@ \\@plus 2fil}\n\\setlength\\@fpbot{0\\p@ \\@plus 1fil}\n\\setlength\\@dblfptop{0\\p@ \\@plus 1fil}\n\\setlength\\@dblfpsep{8\\p@ \\@plus 2fil}\n\\setlength\\@dblfpbot{0\\p@ \\@plus 1fil}\n\n%%%%%%%%%\n%% Listing defaults, \n%% up to six levels of indentation\n\n%% add to top of new list if started in vertical mode\n\\setlength\\partopsep{2\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 1\\p@}\n\n\\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\parsep 4\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\topsep 8\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\itemsep4\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus\\p@}\n\\let\\@listI\\@listi\n\\@listi\n\n\\def\\@listii {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 4\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\parsep 2\\p@ \\@plus\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\itemsep \\parsep}\n\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 2\\p@ \\@plus\\p@\\@minus\\p@\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\partopsep \\p@ \\@plus\\z@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\itemsep \\topsep}\n\n\\def\\@listiv {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiv\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\n\\def\\@listv {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginv\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\n\\def\\@listvi {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginvi\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginvi\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\n\n%% indentation of various levels of listing:\n\\setlength\\leftmargini {2em}\n\\leftmargin \\leftmargini\n\n\\setlength\\leftmarginii {2.2em}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiii {1.87em}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiv {1.7em}\n\n \\setlength\\leftmarginv {.5em}\n \\setlength\\leftmarginvi {.5em}\n\n\\setlength \\labelsep {.5em}\n\\setlength \\labelwidth{\\leftmargini}\n\\addtolength\\labelwidth{-\\labelsep}\n\n\\@beginparpenalty -\\@lowpenalty\n\\@endparpenalty -\\@lowpenalty\n\\@itempenalty -\\@lowpenalty\n\n%% \\begin{enumerate}\\item \\end{enumerate}\n%% will use these defaults:\n\n\\renewcommand\\theenumi{\\@arabic\\c@enumi}\n\\renewcommand\\theenumii{\\@alph\\c@enumii}\n\\renewcommand\\theenumiii{\\@roman\\c@enumiii}\n\\renewcommand\\theenumiv{\\@Alph\\c@enumiv}\n\\newcommand\\labelenumi{\\theenumi.}\n\\newcommand\\labelenumii{(\\theenumii)}\n\\newcommand\\labelenumiii{\\theenumiii.}\n\\newcommand\\labelenumiv{\\theenumiv.}\n\\renewcommand\\p@enumii{\\theenumi}\n\\renewcommand\\p@enumiii{\\theenumi(\\theenumii)}\n\\renewcommand\\p@enumiv{\\p@enumiii\\theenumiii}\n\n%% \\begin{itemize}\\item \\end{itemize}\n%% will use these defaults:\n\n\\newcommand\\labelitemi{\\textbullet}\n\\newcommand\\labelitemii{\\normalfont\\bfseries \\textendash}\n\\newcommand\\labelitemiii{\\textasteriskcentered}\n\\newcommand\\labelitemiv{\\textperiodcentered}\n\n%% \\begin{description}\\item \\end{description}\n%% will use these defaults:\n\n\\newenvironment{description}\n {\\list{}{\\labelwidth\\z@ \\itemindent-\\leftmargin\n \\let\\makelabel\\descriptionlabel}}\n {\\endlist}\n\\newcommand*\\descriptionlabel[1]{\\hspace\\labelsep\n \\normalfont\\bfseries #1}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Used within other commands for influencing\n%% whether to start a new page.\n\\@lowpenalty 51\n\\@medpenalty 151\n\\@highpenalty 301\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Float settings\n\n%% How many figures or tables at the top of page?\n\\setcounter{topnumber}{10}\n%% How much space may be used by figures and tables at the top of page?\n\\renewcommand\\topfraction{.95}\n\n%% Same, at the bottom of the page\n\\setcounter{bottomnumber}{10}\n\\renewcommand\\bottomfraction{.95}\n\n%% How many figures/tables in total on one page?\n\\setcounter{totalnumber}{10}\n\n%% How much of the page should be text?\n\\renewcommand\\textfraction{.01}%% How much of the page must reserved for text?\n\\renewcommand\\floatpagefraction{.95}\n\n%% Similarly, but for double column figures or tables:\n\\setcounter{dbltopnumber}{2}\n\\renewcommand\\dbltopfraction{.95}\n\\renewcommand\\dblfloatpagefraction{.95}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%%%%% Section head definitions\n\\setcounter{secnumdepth}{4}\n\n\\newcounter {section}\n\\newcounter {subsection}[section]\n\\newcounter {subsubsection}[subsection]\n\\newcounter {paragraph}[subsubsection]\n\\newcounter {subparagraph}[paragraph]\n\\renewcommand \\thesection {\\@arabic\\c@section}\n\\renewcommand\\thesubsection {\\@alph\\c@subsection}\n\\renewcommand\\thesubsubsection{\\@arabic\\c@subsubsection}\n\\renewcommand\\theparagraph {(\\@roman\\c@paragraph)}\n\\renewcommand\\thesubparagraph {\\theparagraph.\\@arabic\\c@subparagraph}\n\n%% Innards of \\@startsection, used for section fonts.\n%% The change is to make italic small caps for subsubsection, have\n%% upright section number\n\n\\def\\@sect#1#2#3#4#5#6[#7]#8{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth\n \\let\\@svsec\\@empty\n \\else\n \\refstepcounter{#1}%\n \\protected@edef\\@svsec{\\@seccntformat{#1}\\ifnum#2=4\\else\\ifnum#2=3)\\else.\\fi\\fi\\ \\hskip1pt\\relax}%\n \\fi\n \\@tempskipa #5\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n \\begingroup\n #6{%\n \\@hangfrom{\\hskip #3\\relax\\@svsec}%\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M \n%% the following line is the change from the latex.ltx default:\n\\ifnum#2=3\\let\\dothis\\sc\\else\\let\\dothis\\relax\\fi\\dothis{#8}\n\\@@par}%\n \\endgroup\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}%\n \\fi\n #7}%\n \\else\n \\def\\@svsechd{%\n #6{\\hskip #3\\relax\n \\@svsec #8}%\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}%\n \\fi\n #7}}%\n \\fi\n \\@xsect{#5}}\n\n\\newcommand\\section{\\@startsection {section}{1}{\\z@}%\n {-12pt \\@plus -1ex \\@minus -.2ex}%\n {6pt}%\n {\\ifdraft\\large\\else\\normalsize\\fi\\bfseries}}\n\\newcommand\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}%\n {-12pt \\@plus -1ex \\@minus -.2ex}%\n {6pt}%\n {\\ifdraft\\large\\else\\normalsize\\fi\\it}}\n\\newcommand\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}%\n {-12pt \\@plus -1ex \\@minus -.2ex}%\n {6pt}%\n {\\sc}}%\n\\newcommand\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}%\n {6pt \\@plus1ex \\@minus.2ex}%\n {-1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\ifdraft\\large\\else\\normaltextsize\\fi\\it}}\n\\newcommand\\subparagraph{\\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\\parindent}%\n {3.25ex \\@plus1ex \\@minus .2ex}%\n {-1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\normaltextsize\\bfseries}}\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Quotation, Quote\n\\newenvironment{quotation}\n {\\list{}{\\listparindent 1.5em%\n \\itemindent \\listparindent\n \\rightmargin \\leftmargin\n \\parsep \\z@ \\@plus\\p@}%\n \\item\\relax}\n {\\endlist}\n\n\\newenvironment{quote}\n {\\list{}{\\rightmargin\\leftmargin}%\n \\item\\relax}\n {\\endlist}\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Setting table and array widths\n%% (\\begin{tabular}...\\end{tabular} and\n%% \\begin{array}...\\end{array}\n\n%% white space between columns in array\n\\setlength\\arraycolsep{5\\p@}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% white space between columns in tabular\n\\setlength\\tabcolsep{6\\p@}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Width of ruled lines in array\n\\setlength\\arrayrulewidth{.4\\p@}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Distance between two ruled lines\n\\setlength\\doublerulesep{2\\p@}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\setlength\\tabbingsep{\\labelsep}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%%% \\fbox{} settings\n\n%% determine how much space between ruled lines and text:\n\\setlength\\fboxsep{3\\p@}\n\n%% Width of ruled lines used by \\fbox:\n\\setlength\\fboxrule{.4\\p@}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Declaring counters\n\n%% equations counter:\n\\renewcommand \\theequation {\\@arabic\\c@equation}\n\n%% figure counter:\n\\newcounter{figure}\n\\renewcommand\\thefigure{\\@arabic\\c@figure}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Equation line spacing\n\n\\everydisplay{\\def\\arraystretch{1.0}}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Figures\n\n%% Choices for figure float placement if [] hasn't been\n%% used for \\begin{figure} \n\\def\\fps@figure{tbp}\n\\def\\draftspace{\\renewcommand\\baselinestretch{1.75}}\n\\def\\twocolspace{\\renewcommand\\baselinestretch{1}}\n%\\renewcommand\\baselinestretch{2.25}\n\\ifdraft\\draftspace\\else\\twocolspace\\fi\n\n\n\\def\\ftype@figure{1}\n\\def\\ext@figure{lof} %for List of Figures, which we won't use\n\\def\\fnum@figure{\\figurename~\\thefigure}\n\n\\newenvironment{figure}\n {\\@float{figure}}\n {\\end@float}\n\\newenvironment{figure*}\n {\\@dblfloat{figure}}\n {\\end@dblfloat}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Tables\n\\newcounter{table}\n\n%% Choices for table float placement if [] hasn't been\n%% used for \\begin{table} \n\\def\\fps@table{tbp}\n\n%\\renewcommand\\baselinestretch{2.25}\n\\ifdraft\\draftspace\\else\\twocolspace\\fi\n\n\\def\\ftype@table{2}\n\\def\\ext@table{lot} % for List of Tables, which we won't use\n\\def\\fnum@table{\\tablename~\\thetable}\n\n\\newenvironment{table}\n {\\footnotesize\\@float{table}}\n {\\end@float}\n\n\\newenvironment{table*}\n {\\@dblfloat{table}}\n {\\end@dblfloat}\n\n%%% Figure and Table Captions\n\\newlength\\abovecaptionskip\n\\newlength\\belowcaptionskip\n\\setlength\\abovecaptionskip{10\\p@}\n\\setlength\\belowcaptionskip{5\\p@}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%%% Bibliography\n%%% Customized with natbib package\n\n\\newdimen\\bibindent\n\\setlength\\bibindent{1.5em}\n\\newenvironment{thebibliography}[1]\n {\\section*{\\refname\n \\@mkboth{\\MakeUppercase\\refname}{\\MakeUppercase\\refname}}%\n \\list{\\@biblabel{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n {\\settowidth\\labelwidth{\\@biblabel{#1}}%\n \\leftmargin\\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\labelsep\n \\@openbib@code\n \\usecounter{enumiv}%\n \\let\\p@enumiv\\@empty\n \\renewcommand\\theenumiv{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n \\sloppy\n \\clubpenalty4000\n \\@clubpenalty \\clubpenalty\n \\widowpenalty4000%\n \\sfcode`\\.\\@m}\n {\\def\\@noitemerr\n {\\@latex@warning{Empty `thebibliography' environment}}%\n \\endlist}\n\\newcommand\\newblock{\\hskip .11em\\@plus.33em\\@minus.07em}\n\\let\\@openbib@code\\@empty\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% To get curr month/day/year\n\n\\def\\today{\\ifcase\\month\\or\n January\\or February\\or March\\or April\\or May\\or June\\or\n July\\or August\\or September\\or October\\or November\\or December\\fi\n \\space\\number\\day, \\number\\year}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Two-column defaults\n\n\\setlength\\columnsep{12\\p@}\n\\setlength\\columnseprule{0\\p@}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Default page style: plain\n%% Running heads and feet\n\n\\pagestyle{headings}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Default page numbering\n\n\\pagenumbering{arabic}\n\n%% default page style, some leaway for lines going into\n%% margin, no ragged bottom\n\\ifdraft\\else\n \\twocolumn\\fi\n \\sloppy\n \\flushbottom\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% All the usepackages included in this style %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,amssymb,bm}\n\\usepackage{mathptmx}%{times}\n\\usepackage{newtxtext}\n\\usepackage{newtxmath}\n\\usepackage{epstopdf}\n\\usepackage[scaled=.97]{helvet} %% to get bold helvetica\n\\usepackage{fancyhdr}\n\\usepackage{natbib}\n\\def\\bibfont{\\ifdraft\\normalsize\\else\\footnotesize\\fi}\n\\usepackage{url}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{indentfirst}\n\\usepackage{multicol}\n\\usepackage{ifthen}\n\\usepackage{rotating}\n\\usepackage{appendix}\n%\\usepackage{mdframed}\n%\\usepackage{cuted}\n\\usepackage{setspace}\n\n\n%% Start line numbers immediately if in draft mode\n\\ifdraft\n\\usepackage{lineno}\n%\\linenumbers\n\\fi\n\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%% Setting up title/running head info %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\def\\title#1{\\def\\thetitle{#1}}\n\\def\\received#1{\\ifdraft\\def\\thereceived{}\\else\\def\\thereceived{#1}\\fi}\n\\received{}\n\\def\\authors#1{\\def\\theauthors{#1}}\n\\def\\author#1{\\def\\theauthors{#1}}\n\n%\\newcounter{extraauth}\n\\newcounter{loopnum}\n\n%\\def\\extraauthor#1{\\global\\advance\\c@extraauth by 1\n%\\expandafter\\gdef\\csname extraauthors\\the\\c@extraauth\\endcsname{#1}}\n%\n%\\let\\extraauthors\\extraauthor\n%\n%\\def\\extraaffil#1{\\expandafter\\gdef\\csname extraaffil\\the\\c@extraauth\\endcsname{#1}}\n\\newcommand\\aff[1]{\\textsuperscript{\\rm#1}\\,}\n\\def\\affiliation#1{\\def\\theaffiliation{#1}}\n\n%\\let\\theextraaffil\\relax\n%\\let\\theextraauthor\\relax\n%\\let\\theextraauthors\\relax\n\n\\def\\abstract#1{\\def\\theabstract{%\n\\centerline{\\vtop{\\ifdraft\\normalsize\\else \\bigfootnotesize\\fi\\linewidth 5.25cm\n%\\ifdraft\\internallinenumbers\\fi\n\\noindent{ABSTRACT:}\\;\\;\\relax #1\\vskip1sp}}}}\n\n\\let\\dothanks\\relax\n\n\n\\def\\correspondingauthor#1{%\n%\\thanks{\\ifdraft\\internallinenumbers\\normalsize\\fi\n\\thanks{\\ifdraft\\normalsize\\fi\n \\noindent{{\\it Corresponding author}:}\\ #1\n% \\vskip1pt\n% \\noindent\\theemail\n}}\n\n\\let\\thecorrespondingauthor\\relax\n\n%{\\makeatletter\n%\\gdef\\email{\\bgroup\\makeatletter\\xemail}\n%\\gdef\\xemail#1{\\gdef\\theemail{{\\ifdraft\\normalsize\\else\\footnotesize\\fi E-mail: #1}}\\egroup}\n%}\n\n%\\def\\articledoi#1{\\def\\thedoi{{\\ifdraft\\normalsize\\else\\scriptsize\\fi\\sc DOI: #1}}}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Significance statement/Capsule\n\n\n%\\newenvironment{sig}\n%{\n%%\\begin{strip}\n%\\begin{mdframed}[backgroundcolor=white, linecolor=white]\n%{SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT:}\\;}\n%{\n%\\end{mdframed}\n%%\\end{strip}\n%}\n%\n%\\newenvironment{twocolsig}\n%{\n%\\begin{strip}\n%\\vspace*{-2cm}\n%\\begin{mdframed}[backgroundcolor=white, linecolor=white]\n%{SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT:}\\;}\n%{\n%\\end{mdframed}\n%\\vspace*{-3mm}\n%\\end{strip}\n%}\n%\n%\\newenvironment{capsule}\n%{\n%%\\begin{strip}\n%\\begin{mdframed}[backgroundcolor=white, linecolor=white]\n%{CAPSULE:}\\;}\n%{\n%\\end{mdframed}\n%%\\end{strip}\n%}\n%\\newenvironment{twocolcapsule}\n%{\n%\\begin{strip}\n%\\vspace*{-2cm}\n%\\begin{mdframed}[backgroundcolor=white, linecolor=white]\n%{CAPSULE:}\\;}\n%{\n%\\end{mdframed}\n%\\vspace*{-3mm}\n%\\end{strip}\n%}\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% \\maketitle, \\@maketitle, for beginning of article\n\n%% allows multiple \\thanks in draft mode\n\\newcount\\thanksnum\n\\newcount\\savethanksnum\n\\def\\thanksloop{\\savethanksnum=\\thanksnum\n\\thanksnum=1\\relax\n\\loop\n\\ifnum\\thanksnum<\\savethanksnum\n\\ifx\\expandafter\\csname thanks\\the\\thanksnum\\endcsname\\relax\n\\else\n\\vskip1sp\n\\noindent\\llap{}\\csname thanks\\the\\thanksnum\\endcsname\n\\global\\advance\\thanksnum by 1\\fi\n\\repeat\n\\ifx\\expandafter\\csname thanks\\the\\thanksnum\\endcsname\\relax\n\\else\n\\vskip1sp\n\\noindent\\llap{}\\csname thanks\\the\\thanksnum\\endcsname\\ \\vskip1sp\\fi\n}\n\n\n%% allows multiple \\extraauthor and \\extraaffil\n\n%\\def\\extraloop{\\c@loopnum=\\c@extraauth\n%\\c@extraauth=1\\relax\n%\\loop\n%\\ifnum\\c@extraauth<\\c@loopnum\n%\\ifx\\expandafter\\csname extraauthors\\the\\c@extraauth\\endcsname\\relax\n%\\else\n%\\vskip12pt\n%\\ifdraft\\rm\\else\\sc\\fi\n%\\csname extraauthors\\the\\c@extraauth\\endcsname\n%\\vskip3pt\n%{\\it\n%\\csname extraaffil\\the\\c@extraauth\\endcsname}\n%\\global\\advance\\c@extraauth by 1\\fi\n%\\repeat\n%\\ifx\\expandafter\\csname extraauthors\\the\\c@extraauth\\endcsname\\relax\n%\\else\n%\\vskip12pt\n%\\ifdraft\\rm\\else\\sc\\fi\n%\\csname extraauthors\\the\\c@extraauth\\endcsname\n%\\vskip3pt\n%{\\it \\csname extraaffil\\the\\c@extraauth\\endcsname}\n%\\fi\n%}\n\n%% Makes title on first page of article, \n%% allows switches for draft/twocol mode\n\\newif\\iffirstpage\n\\newcommand\\maketitle{\\par\n\\global\\firstpagetrue\n\\thispagestyle{fancy}\n\\lhead{\\color{gray}Generated using the official AMS \\LaTeX\\ template v6.1 two-column layout. This work has been submitted for publication. Copyright in this work may be transferred without further notice, and this version may no longer be accessible.}\n\\ifdraft\\lhead{\\hfill\\color{gray} Generated using the official AMS \\LaTeX\\ template v6.1 \\hfill} \\fi\n\\chead{}\n\\rhead{}\n\\lfoot{}\n\\cfoot{\\thepage}\n\\rfoot{}\n\\renewcommand{\\headrulewidth}{0pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\footrulewidth}{0pt}\n \\begingroup\n \\renewcommand\\thefootnote{}%\n \\def\\@makefnmark{\\rlap{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont\\@thefnmark}}}%\n \\long\\def\\@makefntext##1{\\parindent 1em\\footnotesize\\noindent\n \\hb@xt@1.8em{%\n \\hss\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont\\@thefnmark}}##1\n \\vskip1sp\n% \\vskip1pt\\footnoterule\n \\small\n \\vskip3pt\n\\ifdraft\\else\\dothanks\\fi\n}%\n\\ifdraft\n \\@maketitle\n\\@thanks \n\\else\n \\twocolumn[\\@maketitle]%\n\\@thanks\n\\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}%\n \\global\\let\\thanks\\relax\n \\global\\let\\maketitle\\relax\n \\global\\let\\@maketitle\\relax\n \\global\\let\\@thanks\\@empty\n \\global\\let\\theauthor\\@empty\n \\global\\let\\@date\\@empty\n \\global\\let\\thetitle\\@empty\n \\global\\let\\title\\relax\n \\global\\let\\author\\relax\n\\normalsize\n}\n\n%% Allows switches for draft/twocol mode\n\\def\\@maketitle{%\n\\vglue61pt\n \\begin{center}%\n\\ifdraft\n\\def\\thanks##1{\\global\\advance\\thanksnum by 1\n\\expandafter\\gdef\\csname thanks\\the\\thanksnum\\endcsname{##1}}\n\\fi%\n {\n\\vglue-4pt\n\\ifdraft\\Large\\else\\large\\fi\\bf \\thetitle \\par}% \n \\vskip 12pt\n {\\normalsize\\ifdraft\\rm\\else\\sc\\fi\\theauthors%\n}\n \\vskip 6pt\n{\\bigfootnotesize\\it\n%\\ifdraft\\internallinenumbers\\normalsize\\fi\n\\ifdraft\\normalsize\\fi\n\\theaffiliation\n\\ifdraft\\normalsize\\fi\n%%\n%{\\normalsize\n%\\extraloop\n%}\\vskip5pt\n%\\fi\n%%\n\\vskip14pt\n\\rm\n\\ifx\\thereceived\\empty\\else\n(\\thereceived)\n\\vskip9pt\n\\fi\n}\n\\end{center}\n\\ifdraft\n\\vfill\n\\thanksloop\n\\dothanks\n\\eject\\fi\n%\\centerline{\\ifdraft\\normalsize\\else\\bigfootnotesize\\fi\\sc ABSTRACT}\n%\\vskip7pt\n\\theabstract\n\\vskip17pt\n\\ifdraft\\newpage\\fi\n}\n\n\n\\advance\\voffset-36pt\n\n\n%% to be used in running heads for [twocol] option:\n\\def\\runningheadauthors#1{%\n\\def\\therunningheadauthors{{\\spaceskip=1pt #1}}}\n\\runningheadauthors{Please use command {\\tt\\string\\runningheadauthors\\string{\\string}}}\n\\runningheadauthors{}\n\n%% to be used in running heads for [twocol] option:\n\\def\\and{\\ \\ \\ A N D\\ \\ \\ }\n\n%% Keeps single line at bottom of previous page or at top of current page\n%% from occurring.\n\\clubpenalty=10000\n\\widowpenalty=10000\n\n%% It would be nice to use this, but it messes up the page makeup.\n%% No hyphenation over page breaks\n%\\brokenpenalty=5000\n\n%% bold helvetica, which will scale according to font family\n%% where it is found:\n\n\\def\\sfbf#1{\\leavevmode\\hbox{\\fontfamily{phv}\\selectfont\\bfseries #1}}\n\n\n%% needed for small caps in italic for subsubsection head\n%% Doing this in tikz saves having to import another font file\n\n\\newcommand{\\textscsl}[1]{%\n \\tikz[baseline=(N.base)]%\n % The transform says:\n % x' = 1x + 0.22y + 0pt\n % y' = 0x + 1y + 0pt\n % This gives a slant - adjust the value for each font!\n \\pgfsys@transformcm{1}{0}{0.22}{1}{0pt}{0pt}%\n \\node[inner sep=0pt] (N) {\\textsc{#1}};%\n}\n\n\\def\\listfigurename{\\uppercase{List of Figures}}\n\\def\\listtablename{\\uppercase{List of Tables}}\n\n%% needed for draft version\n%\\newcommand\\listoffigures{%\n% \\section*{\\listfigurename\n% \\@mkboth{\\MakeUppercase\\listfigurename}%\n% {\\MakeUppercase\\listfigurename}}%\n%\\baselineskip=18pt\n%\\normalsize\n% \\@starttoc{lof}%\n% }\n%\n%\\newcommand\\listoftables{%\n% \\section*{\\listtablename\n% \\@mkboth{\\MakeUppercase\\listtablename}%\n% {\\MakeUppercase\\listtablename}}%\n%\\baselineskip=18pt\n%\\normalsize\n% \\@starttoc{lot}%\n% }\n\n%% Handle table and figure captions somewhat differently; put\n%% in line numbers when in draft mode, change font size for draft mode.\n\n%\\def\\appendcaption#1#2{\\ifdraft\n%\\ifx\\@captype\\xtable \n%\\@makecaption{Table #1}{#2}\n% \\addcontentsline{\\csname ext@table\\endcsname}{table}%\n% {\\protect\\numberline{#1}{\\ignorespaces #2}}%\n%\\else\n%\\@makecaption{Fig. #1}{#2}\n% \\addcontentsline{\\csname ext@figure\\endcsname}{figure}%\n% {\\protect\\numberline{#1}{\\ignorespaces #2}}%\n%\\fi\n%\\else\n%\\caption{#2}\n%\\fi\n%}\n\n\n\\def\\xtable{table}\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{%\n\\ifx\\@captype\\xtable \\vskip4pt\\else \\vskip\\abovecaptionskip\\fi\n \\sbox\\@tempboxa{\\ifdraft\\normaltextsize\\else\\footnotesize\\fi #1. #2}%\n \\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize\n%%\n\\global\\setbox0\\vbox{\n%\\ifdraft\\normaltextsize\\internallinenumbers\\baselineskip=20pt\\else \\footnotesize\\fi\n\\ifdraft\\normaltextsize\\baselineskip=20pt\\else \\footnotesize\\fi\n#1. #2\n}\n\\ifdim\\ht0<24pt\n\\setbox1=\\vbox{\\unvbox0\n\\global\\setbox2=\\lastbox}\n\\copy1\n\\vskip-6pt\n\\centerline{\\hbox{\\unhbox2}}\n\\par\n\\else\n\\ifdraft\\normaltextsize\\else\\footnotesize\\fi\n%\\ifdraft\\internallinenumbers\\baselineskip=20pt\\fi\n\\ifdraft\\baselineskip=20pt\\fi\n\\hskip10pt #1. #2\\par\n\\fi\n \\else\n \\global \\@minipagefalse\n \\hb@xt@\\hsize{\\hfil\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n \\fi\n\\ifx\\@captype\\xtable \n \\vskip\\belowcaptionskip\\fi}\n\n\n\n%% make section heads end with a period.\n\\def\\@seccntformat#1{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}\n\n\\def\\acknowledgments{\\paragraph*{Acknowledgments.}}\n\\def\\acknowledgment{\\paragraph*{Acknowledgment.}}\n\n\\def\\datastatement{\\paragraph*{Data availability statement.}}\n\n\\def\\capsule{\\paragraph*{\\rm CAPSULE:}}\n\\def\\statement{\\paragraph*{\\rm SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT:}}\n\n%% tables, to make correct space around the horizontal lines at the\n%% top, underneath the column headers, and at the bottom of the table.\n\\def\\topline{\\hline\\hline\\vrule height 10pt depth4pt width0pt\\relax}\n\\def\\midline{\\hline\\vrule height 10pt width0pt\\relax}\n\\def\\botline{\\hline}\n\n\n%% Allow two 1 col width tables or 1 col width figures to\n%% be side by side in a two-column width illustration or table.\n\n\\def\\sidebyside#1#2{\\hbox to\\textwidth{%\n\\vbox{\\hsize=.5\\textwidth\\advance\\hsize -6pt #1}\\hfill\n%\\vbox{\\let\\internallinenumbers\\relax\\hsize=.5\\textwidth\\advance\\hsize -6pt #2}}}\n\\vbox{\\let\\relax\\hsize=.5\\textwidth\\advance\\hsize -6pt #2}}}\n\n%% Make tabular default fontsize be footnotesize.\n\\let\\savetabular\\tabular\n\\def\\tabular{\\footnotesize\\baselineskip=12pt\\savetabular}\n\n\\@namedef{tabular*}#1{\\def\\@halignto{to#1}\n\\footnotesize\\baselineskip12pt\\@tabular}\n\n%%% The following commands are used for draft mode when\n%%% figures and tables are sent to the end of the paper.\n%%% These terms help format the list of tables and list of figures nicely.\n\n\n\\def\\fignumberline#1#2{\\bgroup\n\\normaltextsize\\parindent=0pt\\leftskip=42pt\\noindent\\hskip-42pt\\hbox to 42pt{\\bf Fig.~#1.\\hfill}%\n\\advance\\hsize -42pt\n#2\\xdotfill\\currpage\\hbox to -44pt{}\\vskip1sp\\egroup}\n\n\\def\\tabnumberline#1#2{\\bgroup\n\\normaltextsize\\parindent=0pt\\leftskip=50pt\\noindent\\hskip-50pt\\hbox to 50pt{\\bf Table~#1.\\hfill}%\n\\advance\\hsize -88pt\n#2\\xdotfill\\currpage\\hbox to -50pt{}\\vskip1sp\\egroup}\n\n\n\\def\\l@figure#1#2{%\n\\let\\numberline\\fignumberline\n\\def\\currpage{#2}#1\\vskip12pt}\n\n\\def\\l@table#1#2{%\n\\let\\numberline\\tabnumberline\n\\def\\currpage{#2}#1\\vskip12pt}\n\n%% Make meaning different depending on whether in draft or twocol mode.\n\\def\\thanks#1{\n \\protected@xdef\\@thanks{\\@thanks\n \\protect\\footnotetext[\\the\\c@footnote]{%\n%\\ifdraft\\noexpand\\internallinenumbers\\fi#1}}%\n\\ifdraft\\noexpand\\fi#1}}%\n}\n\n%% Wider space between dots than standard \\dotfill\n\\def\\xdotfill{%\n \\leavevmode\n \\cleaders \\hb@xt@ 1.5em{\\hss.\\hss}\\hfill\n \\kern\\z@}\n\n\n\n\\ifdraft\n%%% only needed if line numbers are activated\n\n%%% from Brian Papa, ametsoc.sty\n\n% The following section defines a new command that helps to resolve the issue of missing line numbers preceding some \n% equations when using various math display environments\n%\n\\newcommand*\\patchAmsMathEnvironmentForLineno[1]{%\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname old#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\\csname #1\\endcsname\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname oldend#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\\csname end#1\\endcsname\n \\renewenvironment{#1}%\n {\\linenomath\\csname old#1\\endcsname}%\n {\\csname oldend#1\\endcsname\\endlinenomath}}% \n\\newcommand*\\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno[1]{%\n \\patchAmsMathEnvironmentForLineno{#1}%\n \\patchAmsMathEnvironmentForLineno{#1*}}%\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n\\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{equation}%\n\\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{align}%\n\\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{flalign}%\n\\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{alignat}%\n\\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{gather}%\n\\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{multline}%\n\\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{eqnarray}%\n}\n\\fi\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% Appendix\n\n\\newif\\iffirstappendix\n\\newenvironment{appendix}[1][1]%\n{\\vskip12pt\\goodbreak\n\\ifthenelse{\\equal{#1}{1}}%\n{\\renewcommand\\theequation{A\\arabic{equation}}%\n\\setcounter{equation}{0}% reset counter\n%\\ifdraft\\else\n\\setcounter{figure}{0}% reset counter\n\\setcounter{table}{0}% reset counter\n\\renewcommand\\thefigure{A\\arabic{figure}}\n\\renewcommand\\thetable{A\\arabic{table}}\n%\\fi\n\\setcounter{section}{0}% reset counter\n\\setcounter{subsection}{0}% reset counter\n\\renewcommand\\thesection{A\\arabic{section}}\n\\begin{center}%\n{\\textnormal APPENDIX}%\n\\end{center}}%\n{\\renewcommand\\theequation{{#1}\\arabic{equation}}%\n\\setcounter{equation}{0}% reset counter\n\\setcounter{section}{0}% reset counter\n\\setcounter{subsection}{0}% reset counter\n\\setcounter{figure}{0}% reset counter\n\\setcounter{table}{0}% reset counter\n%\\ifdraft\\else\n\\renewcommand\\thefigure{#1\\arabic{figure}}\n\\renewcommand\\thetable{#1\\arabic{table}}\n%\\fi\n\\renewcommand\\thesection{#1\\arabic{section}}\n\\begin{center}%\n{\\textnormal APPENDIX #1}%\n\\end{center}}\n}%\n\n\n\n\n\\long\\def\\appendixtitle#1{{\\vskip-1pt\\centering\\bf #1\\vskip6pt}}\n\n\\bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}\n\n\\endinput\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091158,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31958"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31958"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Jagdeep Singh Bhatia"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Jagdeep Singh Bhatia, Andrew Wagenmaker, William Chen, Sergey Levine"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Adapting Generalist Robot Policies with Semantic Reinforcement Learning"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"Website: https://semantic-action-rl.github.io/"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.RO"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Generalist robot policies learn a diverse repertoire of behaviors from large-scale pretraining. In principle, this makes them excellent priors for downstream adaptation via reinforcement learning (RL). In practice, however, standard RL methods leveraging this prior optimize directly over robot actions, requiring the base policy's action distribution to be close to that of a performant policy from the start. This assumption breaks down for complex or long-horizon tasks that fall outside the pretraining distribution. Our key insight is that, for sufficiently expressive generalist policies, language prompts are an effective alternative space for learning to solve such tasks: modulating language inputs elicits skills already within the policy's repertoire, which can be composed to solve tasks beyond its zero-shot capabilities. We propose Semantic Action Reinforcement Learning (SARL), which learns to optimize this prompt space through online interaction, treating the generalist policy as a controllable skill prior. Importantly, leveraging pretrained skills rather than learning new ones from scratch yields structured, semantically meaningful exploration and highly efficient online improvement, and learning to modulate prompts through experience grounds them in induced real-world behaviors for robust task-solving. Across real-world settings and simulated benchmarks, we show SARL unlocks fundamentally new capabilities -- adapting VLA behavior to solve complex, long-horizon tasks -- and significantly outperforms existing approaches for improving robot behavior in deployment."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:00:33 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:00:33 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Bhatia","Jagdeep Singh",""],["Wagenmaker","Andrew",""],["Chen","William",""],["Levine","Sergey",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Bhatia\",\n \"Jagdeep Singh\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Wagenmaker\",\n \"Andrew\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Chen\",\n \"William\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Levine\",\n \"Sergey\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: appendix.tex\n================================================\n\\clearpage\n\\section{Experimental Details}\n\\label{app:hyperparams}\n\n\\subsection{\\method: In-practice Optimizations}\nWe make three optimizations to Algorithm~\\ref{alg:main} presented in Section~\\ref{subsec:SARL-algo} to improve learnability and speed.\n\nFirst, as discussed in Section~\\ref{subsec:SARL-algo}, na\\\"{\\i}vely learning over the space of all possible VLA prompts ($\\cAlang$) is intractable. Instead, at every execution step, we use a VLM to produce a set of candidate semantic actions $\\cAlang^t$, which \\method is then run over. However, since the VLM can still, in principle, generate any language prompt, this approach requires a prompt featurization scheme that can both 1) encode the semantic meaning of each prompt 2) generalize the VLA's grounded behavior resulting from each prompt across these features. In practice, we find the latter to be especially difficult with off-the-shelf embeddings. \n\nAs an alternate approach, we cache the first $k$ prompts seen by the algorithm (either generated by the VLM, or provided by a human during demonstrations). After the cache has been filled, the VLM is queried to generate $\\cAlang^t$, but may only choose commands from the size-$k$ cache, rather than generating them open-endedly. This allows for a one-hot prompt featurization which we find enables efficient learning. $|\\cAlang^t|$ and $k$ for each task can be found in Table~\\ref{tab:sarl_hyperparams} as \\texttt{outer\\_policy.max\\_candidates} and \\texttt{outer\\_policy.cache\\_size}, respectively.\n\nWe consider two additional optimizations: First, for each next state $s_{t+1}$ added to the replay buffer in Algorithm~\\ref{alg:main}, we cache the corresponding generated $\\cAlang^{t+1}$, which avoids the need to call the VLM during Temporal-Difference (TD) backups \\cite{barto2021reinforcement}. Second, instead of generating $\\cAlang^t$ for each $t$, we use the same $\\cAlang^t$ for $\\tvlm$ steps before regenerating --- this speeds up the time to collect each episode. A revised Algorithm~\\ref{alg:main} with these optimizations is provided in Algorithm~\\ref{alg:opt}.\n\n\\newcommand{\\cC}{\\mathcal{C}}\n\\newcommand{\\cAlangnew}{\\cAlang^{\\mathrm{new}}}\n\\newcommand{\\cAlangprev}{\\cAlang^{\\mathrm{prev}}}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t!]\n\\vspace{-1.5em}\n \\centering\n \\begin{minipage}{\\linewidth}\n \\begin{algorithm}[H]\n \\caption{\\methodspelledout (\\method) with Optimizations}\n \\begin{algorithmic}[1]\n \\State \\textbf{input}: semantic environment $\\cMsemantic$, semantic action set $\\cAlang$, cache size limit $k$, regeneration period $\\tvlm$, demonstrations $\\frakD$ (optional).\n \\State Initialize $\\Qsem^1$ randomly, replay buffer $\\frakB \\leftarrow \\emptyset$, prompt cache $\\cC \\leftarrow \\emptyset$. If demonstrations $\\frakD$ are provided, update $\\frakB$ and $\\cC$ accordingly. \n \n \\Statex\n \\Function{GetCandidates}{$s, t, \\cC, \\cAlangprev$}\n \\If{$\\mathtt{mod}(t - 1, \\tvlm) == 0$} \n \\Statex \\hspace{2.6em} {\\color{blue} \\texttt{// Refresh candidate actions}}\n \\If{$|\\cC| < k$} \n \\Statex \\hspace{4em} {\\color{blue} \\texttt{// Cache not yet full: generate open-endedly and cache}}\n \\State Query VLM open-endedly for candidate prompts $\\cAlangnew$ given $s$\n \\State $\\cC \\leftarrow \\cC \\cup \\cAlangnew$ \n \\Else \n \\Statex \\hspace{4em} {\\color{blue} \\texttt{// Cache is full: restrict VLM choices to the cache}}\n \\State Query VLM to select candidate prompts $\\cAlangnew \\subseteq \\cC$ given $s$\n \\EndIf\n \\State \\Return $\\cAlangnew$\n \\Else \n \\Statex \\hspace{2.6em} {\\color{blue} \\texttt{// Reuse previous step's candidates}}\n \\State \\Return $\\cAlangprev$\n \\EndIf\n \\EndFunction\n \\Statex\n \n \\State $\\cAlang^1 \\leftarrow \\textsc{GetCandidates}(s_1, 1, \\cC, \\emptyset)$ \n \\For{$t = 1, 2, 3, \\ldots $}\n \\State Set $\\pisemt(\\ell \\mid s_t ; \\cAlang^t) \\propto \\exp(\\Qsem^t(s_t,\\ell))$ for $\\ell \\in \\cAlang^t$\n \\State Sample $\\ell_t \\sim \\pisemt(\\cdot \\mid s_t ; \\cAlang^t)$\n \\Statex \\hspace{1em} {\\color{blue} \\texttt{// Equivalently, execute action $a_t \\sim \\pivla(\\cdot \\mid s_t, \\ell_t)$ in $\\cM$}}\n \\State Execute semantic action $\\ell_t$ in $\\cMsemantic$, observe reward $r_t$ and next state $s_{t+1}$ \n \\State $\\cAlang^{t+1} \\leftarrow \\textsc{GetCandidates}(s_{t+1}, t+1, \\cC, \\cAlang^t)$ \n \\Statex \\hspace{1em} {\\color{blue} \\texttt{// Cache $\\cAlang^{t+1}$ to eliminate VLM calls during TD backups}}\n \\State $\\frakB \\leftarrow \\frakB \\cup \\{ (s_t, \\ell_t, r_t, s_{t+1}, \\cAlang^{t+1}) \\}$ \n\n \\State Set $\\Vbarsem^t(s') \\leftarrow \\mathbb{E}_{\\ell' \\sim \\pisemt(\\cdot \\mid s' ; \\cAlang')} \\big[ \\Qbar_{\\mathrm{sem}}^t(s', \\ell') \\big]$ where $\\pisemt(\\ell' \\mid s'; \\cAlang') \\propto \\exp(\\Qsem^t(s', \\ell'))$ for $\\ell' \\in \\cAlang'$ and\n \\begin{align*}\n \\textstyle\n \\Qsem^{t+1} \\leftarrow \\min_Q \\sum_{(s,\\ell,r,s',\\cAlang') \\in \\frakB} (Q(s,\\ell) - r - \\Vbarsem^t(s'))^2 \n \\end{align*}\n \\EndFor\n \\end{algorithmic}\n \\label{alg:opt}\n\\end{algorithm}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\subsection{MDP Definition}\n\nFor steering methods that make decisions over chunks of low-level actions, it is helpful to distinguish two distinct Markov Decision Processes (MDPs): low-level MDPs and high-level MDPs. In low-level MDPs, each transition corresponds to executing a single action in the underlying environment. By contrast, high-level MDPs operate over a coarser temporal resolution, where each transition corresponds to a ``chunk'' of low-level actions executed entirely open-loop. When converting low-level MDPs into high-level MDPs, we define a \\textit{high-level step size} to be the number of low-level actions executed open-loop in each transition of the high-level MDP. The horizon of a task in a high-level MDP is therefore its horizon in the corresponding low-level MDP divided by the high-level step-size. \n\nThe methods evaluated in this work operate over high-level MDPs, which improves rollout speed (especially when querying a VLM is required at each MDP step) and temporal consistency of actions. As shown in Table~\\ref{tab:mdp-def}, each task's horizon --- defined in terms of low-level environment steps --- remains constant across all compared methods. However, the high-level step size varies across tasks and methods.\n\nFor real-world WidowX experiments, we use a high-level step size of $20$ for the VLM baseline, querying the VLM every $20$ environment steps for a new prompt to issue the VLA. This keeps in line with \\citet{chen2026steerable}, which this baseline is based on. For our method, \\method, we query the VLM at the same rate, every $20$ steps ($\\tvlm=20$), to generate candidate semantic actions $\\cAlang^t$. However, we use a high-level step size of $1$, allowing the RL policy fine-grained control to choose which of these candidates is most relevant at each state. For a fair comparison, we also set the high-level step size of DSRL \\cite{wagenmaker2025steering} and Residual RL baselines \\cite{xiao2025self, ankile2025imitation, xu2026rl} to be $1$, so that they are also able to make reactive, fine-grained adjustments based on the state.\n\nIn simulation, we sweep the VLM's high-level step size over $40$, $80$ and $120$ and find $40$ to be best. We additionally sweep \\method's high-level step size over $40$ and $120$ (keeping $\\tvlm=1$) and find better mode-consistent exploration with $120$. The original DSRL implementation \\cite{wagenmaker2025steering} uses $\\pi_0$ \\cite{black2024pi0} with a high-level step size of $20$. Our work uses $\\pi_{0.5}$ \\cite{intelligence2025pi_} --- for improved language-following capabilities --- with a high-level step size of $10$, as this is the action horizon of $\\pi_{0.5}$. For fairness, we use the same step size for Residual RL. We find our hyperparameter selection for both DSRL and Residual RL to be competitive with the Libero \\cite{liu2023libero} results from \\citet{wagenmaker2025steering}. Further details on hyperparamters for DSRL \\cite{wagenmaker2025steering}, Residual RL \\cite{xiao2025self, ankile2025imitation, xu2026rl}, and \\method can be found in Tables~\\ref{tab:dsrl_hyperparams},~\\ref{tab:residual_rl_hyperparams}, and~\\ref{tab:sarl_hyperparams}, respectively.\n\n\\begin{table*}[h!]\n\\caption{\\textbf{MDP Definition Across Tasks and Methods.} Task horizon is the total number of low-level environment steps allocated per task. The high-level step size defines the conversion between high-level steering steps to low-level environment steps. To get the horizon $H$ of the high-level MDP for each method and task (over which learning happens), divide the task horizon by the high-level step size.}\n\\label{tab:mdp-def}\n\\centering\n\\begin{tabular}{p{4.5cm} cccc cccc}\n\\toprule\n& \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\textbf{\\texttt{Task Horizon}}} & \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\textbf{\\texttt{High-Level Step Size}}} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){2-5} \\cmidrule(lr){6-9}\n\\textbf{Task} & \\small{\\textbf{\\method}} & \\small{\\textbf{DSRL}} & \\small{\\textbf{Residual}} & \\small{\\textbf{VLM}} & \\small{\\textbf{\\method}} & \\small{\\textbf{DSRL}} & \\small{\\textbf{Residual}} & \\small{\\textbf{VLM}} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\textbf{Real Task 1:} Move the hammer to the plate. Then, grasp the mushroom. & 120 & 120 & 120 & 120 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 20 \\\\\n\\addlinespace\n\\textbf{Real Task 2:} Move the banana to the pot on the right and sushi to the bowl. & 160 & 160 & 160 & 160 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 20 \\\\\n\\addlinespace\n\\textbf{Real Task 3:} Move the left stuffed toy to the largest bowl. & 100 & 100 & 100 & 100 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 20 \\\\\n\\addlinespace\n\\textbf{Real Task 4:} Move the pot lid to the towel. & 60 & 60 & 60 & 60 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 20 \\\\\n\\addlinespace\n\\textbf{Libero-10} & 600 & 600 & 600 & 600 & 120 & 10 & 10 & 40 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\subsection{Reset-to-home}\n\nIn simulation, we evaluate \\method along with baselines on the Libero-10 (Libero-long) benchmark \\cite{liu2023libero}. As mentioned in Section~\\ref{subsec:experimental-setup}, we use a VLA based on $\\pi_{0.5}$ \\cite{intelligence2025pi_}, and finetuned on the Libero-90 and DROID datasets \\cite{liu2023libero, khazatsky2024droid}. In addition to the original language prompt space for this VLA, we also introduce a ``reset-to-home'' command that resets the robot arm to its starting state. We find such a command to be necessary to chain individual skills and make progress on the long-horizon tasks of the Libero-10 benchmark. Note that the ``reset-to-home\" functionality is straightforward to implement on both simulated and real robots, since it simply runs a PID controller to match the robot's joint-angles or end-effector pose at its starting configuration. Note that the capacity to seamlessly integrate such auxiliary controllers through language highlights a unique strength of our approach. Both \\method and the VLM baseline may leverage the ``reset-to-home'' command, and it is up to the individual approach how many steps to run this instruction for.\n\n\\subsection{Environment Step Plots}\n\n\\begin{figure*}\n % \\vspace{-1.5em}\n \\centering\n % \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{figs/real_env_steps_cropped.pdf}\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{figsv2/real_env_steps_cropped.pdf}\n \\caption{Across four complex, real-world tasks, learning over semantic actions with \\method enables the best improvement of generalist policy behavior in deployment. \\method enables new capabilities over prior steering methods such as DSRL \\cite{wagenmaker2025steering} and Residual RL \\cite{xiao2025self, ankile2025imitation, xu2026rl}, as these methods are fundamentally constrained by the base policy's performance under the task's original prompt. In particular, both DSRL and Residual RL perform best on Task 4, which has the least complex task goal. \n %These steering methods work best on Task 3, since it has the shortest horizon. \n Finally, our method outperforms an in-context learning VLM baseline (ICL VLM) \\cite{chen2026steerable}, since VLMs struggle to ground semantic actions in physical behaviors. Each data-point represents $10$ evaluations. This plot mirrors Figure~\\ref{fig:real-graphs}, but the x-axis is changed to measure environment steps instead of episodes.} \n \\label{fig:real-graphs-env-steps}\n \\vspace{-0.5em}\n\\end{figure*}\n\nIn the main paper, we provide plots which measure performance against the number of episodes spent training. In Figure~\\ref{fig:real-graphs-env-steps}, we provide the same plot with the x-axis swapped to show the number of environment steps spent training, as this is a standard choice in many prior works.\n\n\\subsection{VLM Prompts}\n\nWe use the Gemini model family \\cite{team2023gemini, team2025gemini} for all VLM calls in \\method and the VLM baseline. All VLM calls use the \\texttt{gemini-3-flash-preview} model and are allocated $1024$ thinking tokens. Our methods use six total prompts (across real and sim experiments, two prompts generate candidate semantic actions $\\cAlang^t$ open-endedly and from a cache, and another is used for the in-context learning VLM baseline). All prompts make minimal modifications to \\citet{chen2026steerable}. Prompts for real are provided in Figures~\\ref{fig:real-open-ended},~\\ref{fig:real-cache}, and ~\\ref{fig:real-sp-baseline} and those for sim are provided in Figures~\\ref{fig:sim-open-ended},~\\ref{fig:sim-cache}, and ~\\ref{fig:sim-sp-baseline}.\n\n\\subsection{Additional Qualitative Examples}\n\nAdditional qualitative examples of catastrophic failures due to the in-context learning VLM baseline's lack of grounding are shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:vlm-vs-sarl-full} (extending Figure~\\ref{fig:vlm-vs-sarl}).\n\n\n\\begin{figure*}[h!]\n \\centering\n % \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\linewidth]{figs/grounding_cropped.pdf}\n \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\linewidth]{figsv2/sarl-vs-vlm-full-v2_cropped.pdf}\n \\caption{Across tasks, an in-context learning VLM \\cite{chen2026steerable} takes semantic actions that are semantically meaningful, but lack grounding in physical behaviors, leading to task failures. By contrast, \\method's learned semantic actions correctly navigate scenarios where choosing the right instruction is critical.}\n %Blue and red boxes indicate commands chosen by VLM and \\method, respectively, and the images show the resulting effect in the environment.\n \\label{fig:vlm-vs-sarl-full}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\n\\begin{table*}[htbp]\n\\caption{\\textbf{DSRL Hyperparameters.} Implementations make minimal modifications to \\citet{wagenmaker2025steering}. \\textit{Real} indicates experiments run on the WidowX while \\textit{Sim} indicates experiments run on Libero-10 \\cite{liu2023libero}.}\n\\label{tab:dsrl_hyperparams}\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\begin{tabular}{llp{5.5cm}}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Hyperparameter} & \\textbf{Value} & \\textbf{Description} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.action\\_dim} & 32 & Action space dimension, which is the same as the latent-noise dim for $\\pi$ series policies \\cite{intelligence2025pi_}. This low-dim action is repeated across the predicted action horizon as done in \\cite{wagenmaker2025steering} \\\\\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.state\\_dim} & 8 & Policy has access to a proprioceptive observation \\\\\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.policy\\_chunk\\_size} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 1 & \\textit{Sim:} 10 \\end{tabular} & Number of actions used from each evaluation of $\\pi$ series policies \\cite{intelligence2025pi_} which generate chunks of actions \\\\\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.image\\_resolution} & [64, 64] & Image resolution \\\\\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.camera\\_names} & [``global\"] & We only use scene cameras for all experiments \\\\\n\\texttt{env.image\\_resolution} & [256, 256] & Image resolution of the base environment's camera \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.batch\\_size} & 256 & Optimization batch size for the replay buffer \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.actor\\_lr} & 0.0001 & Learning rate for the SAC \\cite{haarnoja2018soft} actor network \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.critic\\_lr} & 0.0003 & Learning rate for the SAC critic network \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.temp\\_lr} & 0.0003 & Learning rate for the SAC entropy coefficient ($\\alpha$) \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.hidden\\_dims} & [128, 128, 128] & Hidden dimensions for SAC MLP layers \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.cnn\\_features} & [32, 32, 32, 32] & Feature maps per layer for the CNN encoder \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.cnn\\_strides} & [2, 2, 2, 2] & Strides per layer for the CNN encoder \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.cnn\\_padding} & \\texttt{VALID} & Padding type for the CNN encoder layers \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.cnn\\_latent\\_dim} & 50 & CNN output feature dim \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.tau} & 0.005 & Target network soft-update rate \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.critic\\_reduction} & \\texttt{min} & Ensemble reduction strategy for target Q-values \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.num\\_qs} & 10 & Number of Q-networks in the critic ensemble \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.dropout\\_rate} & 0.0 & Dropout rate applied inside SAC networks \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.init\\_temperature} & 1.0 & Initial value for the SAC entropy coefficient \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.target\\_entropy} & -16.0 & Target entropy \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.action\\_range} & [-1.0, 1.0] & Defines the allowed min/max action. Note: SAC always sees actions in [-1.0, 1.0], but actions are scaled to be within \\texttt{sac.action\\_range} before executing in the environment. \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.discount} & $1 - \\frac{1}{H}$ & Discount is defined based on the task horizon $H$ --- see Table~\\ref{tab:mdp-def}. \\\\\n\\texttt{train.learning\\_starts} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 10 & \\textit{Sim:} 25 \\end{tabular} & Episodes collected via uniformly sampling \\texttt{sac. action\\_range} to seed the replay buffer pre-learning \\\\\n\\texttt{train.multi\\_grad\\_step} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 10 & \\textit{Sim:} 20 \\end{tabular} & Gradient steps per transition added to the buffer \\\\\n\\texttt{train.offline\\_multi\\_grad\\_step} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 0 & \\textit{Sim:} 5 \\end{tabular} & Gradient steps per transition added to the buffer for episodes collected before \\texttt{train. learning\\_starts} \\\\\n\\texttt{eval.eval\\_every} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 30 & \\textit{Sim:} 50 \\end{tabular} & Number of training episodes between evaluations \\\\\n\\texttt{eval.num\\_evaluations} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 10 & \\textit{Sim:} 64 \\end{tabular} & Number of evaluation episodes \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\n\\begin{table*}[htbp]\n\\caption{\\textbf{Residual RL Hyperparameters.} Implementations make minimal modifications to \\citet{wagenmaker2025steering} and following standard Residual RL implementations \\cite{xiao2025self, ankile2025imitation, xu2026rl}. \\textit{Real} indicates experiments run on the WidowX while \\textit{Sim} indicates experiments run on Libero-10 \\cite{liu2023libero}.}\n\\label{tab:residual_rl_hyperparams}\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\begin{tabular}{llp{5.5cm}}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Hyperparameter} & \\textbf{Value} & \\textbf{Description} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.action\\_dim} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 7 & \\textit{Sim:} 70 \\end{tabular} & Action space dimension, which is $7 \\cdot \\text{\\texttt{outer\\_policy.policy\\_chunk\\_size}}$, since Residual RL predicts a correction for each action to be executed \\\\\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.state\\_dim} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 15 & \\textit{Sim:} 78 \\end{tabular} & Policy has access to an 8-dim proprioceptive observation along with knowledge of the base policy's action \\\\\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.policy\\_chunk\\_size} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 1 & \\textit{Sim:} 10 \\end{tabular} & Number of actions used from each evaluation of $\\pi$ series policies \\cite{intelligence2025pi_} which generate chunks of actions \\\\\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.image\\_resolution} & [64, 64] & Image resolution \\\\\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.camera\\_names} & [``global\"] & We only use scene cameras for all experiments \\\\\n\\texttt{env.image\\_resolution} & [256, 256] & Image resolution of the base environment's camera \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.batch\\_size} & 256 & Optimization batch size for the replay buffer \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.actor\\_lr} & 0.0001 & Learning rate for the SAC \\cite{haarnoja2018soft} actor network \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.critic\\_lr} & 0.0003 & Learning rate for the SAC critic network \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.temp\\_lr} & 0.0003 & Learning rate for the SAC entropy coefficient ($\\alpha$) \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.hidden\\_dims} & [128, 128, 128] & Hidden dimensions for SAC MLP layers \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.cnn\\_features} & [32, 32, 32, 32] & Feature maps per layer for the CNN encoder \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.cnn\\_strides} & [2, 2, 2, 2] & Strides per layer for the CNN encoder \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.cnn\\_padding} & \\texttt{VALID} & Padding type for the CNN encoder layers \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.cnn\\_latent\\_dim} & 50 & CNN output feature dim \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.tau} & 0.005 & Target network soft-update rate \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.critic\\_reduction} & \\texttt{min} & Ensemble reduction strategy for target Q-values \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.num\\_qs} & 10 & Number of Q-networks in the critic ensemble \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.dropout\\_rate} & 0.0 & Dropout rate applied inside SAC networks \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.init\\_temperature} & 1.0 & Initial value for the SAC entropy coefficient \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.target\\_entropy} & $-\\text{\\texttt{action\\_dim}} / 2$ & Target entropy \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.action\\_range} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l@{}} \\textit{Real:} [-0.003, 0.003] \\\\ \\textit{Sim:} [-0.1, 0.1] \\end{tabular} & Defines the allowed min/max action. Note: SAC always sees actions in [-1.0, 1.0], but actions are scaled to be within \\texttt{sac.action\\_range} before executing in the environment. \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.discount} & $1 - \\frac{1}{H}$ & Discount is defined based on the task horizon $H$ --- see Table~\\ref{tab:mdp-def}. \\\\\n\\texttt{train.human\\_demos} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 3 & \\textit{Sim:} 0 \\end{tabular} & Human demos collected to seed replay buffer pre-learning \\\\\n\\texttt{train.learning\\_starts} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 5 & \\textit{Sim:} 25 \\end{tabular} & Episodes collected via uniformly sampling \\texttt{sac. action\\_range} to seed the replay buffer pre-learning (this number does not include any human demos) \\\\\n\\texttt{train.multi\\_grad\\_step} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 10 & \\textit{Sim:} 20 \\end{tabular} & Gradient steps per transition added to the buffer \\\\\n\\texttt{train.offline\\_multi\\_grad\\_step} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 0 & \\textit{Sim:} 5 \\end{tabular} & Gradient steps per transition added to the buffer for episodes collected before \\texttt{train. learning\\_starts} \\\\\n\\texttt{eval.eval\\_every} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 30 & \\textit{Sim:} 50 \\end{tabular} & Number of training episodes between evaluations \\\\\n\\texttt{eval.num\\_evaluations} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 10 & \\textit{Sim:} 64 \\end{tabular} & Number of evaluation episodes \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{table*}[htbp]\n\\caption{\\textbf{\\method Hyperparameters.} \\textit{Real} indicates experiments run on the WidowX while \\textit{Sim} indicates experiments run on Libero-10 \\cite{liu2023libero}.}\n\\label{tab:sarl_hyperparams}\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\begin{tabular}{llp{5.5cm}}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Hyperparameter} & \\textbf{Value} & \\textbf{Description} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.max\\_candidates} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 9 & \\textit{Sim:} 4 \\end{tabular} & Max size of $\\cAlang^t$ from Section~\\ref{subsec:SARL-algo} and Algorithm~\\ref{alg:main}. Max number of language prompts the algorithm may choose from at each step \\\\\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.cache\\_size} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l@{}} \\textit{Real:} See Table~\\ref{tab:sarl_task_hyperparams} \\\\ \\textit{Sim:} 32 \\end{tabular} & Max size of $\\cAlang$ from Section~\\ref{subsec:SARL-algo} and Algorithm~\\ref{alg:main}. Total number of unique language prompts the algorithm may learn over \\\\\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.action\\_dim} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l@{}} \\textit{Real:} See Table~\\ref{tab:sarl_task_hyperparams} \\\\ \\textit{Sim:} 32 \\end{tabular} & One-hot encoding over cached language commands \\\\\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.state\\_dim} & 8 & Policy has access to a proprioceptive observation \\\\\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.policy\\_chunk\\_size} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 1 & \\textit{Sim:} 10 \\end{tabular} & Number of actions used from each evaluation of $\\pi$ series policies \\cite{intelligence2025pi_} which generate chunks of actions \\\\\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.image\\_resolution} & [64, 64] & Image resolution \\\\\n\\texttt{outer\\_policy.camera\\_names} & [``global\"] & We only use scene cameras for all experiments \\\\\n\\texttt{env.image\\_resolution} & [256, 256] & Image resolution of the base environment's camera \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.batch\\_size} & 256 & Optimization batch size for the replay buffer \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.critic\\_lr} & 0.0003 & Learning rate for the SAC critic network \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.hidden\\_dims} & [128, 128, 128] & Hidden dimensions for SAC MLP layers \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.cnn\\_features} & [32, 32, 32, 32] & Feature maps per layer for the CNN encoder \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.cnn\\_strides} & [2, 2, 2, 2] & Strides per layer for the CNN encoder \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.cnn\\_padding} & \\texttt{VALID} & Padding type for the CNN encoder layers \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.cnn\\_latent\\_dim} & 50 & CNN output feature dim \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.tau} & 0.005 & Target network soft-update rate \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.critic\\_reduction} & \\texttt{min} & Ensemble reduction strategy for target Q-values \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.num\\_qs} & 10 & Number of Q-networks in the critic ensemble \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.dropout\\_rate} & 0.0 & Dropout rate applied inside SAC networks \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.softmax\\_temp} & See Table~\\ref{tab:sarl_task_hyperparams} & Softmax temp, $T$, $\\pisemt(\\ell \\mid s) \\propto \\exp(\\Qsem^t(s,\\ell)/T)$ from Algorithm~\\ref{alg:main}. \\\\\n\\texttt{sac.discount} & $1 - \\frac{1}{H}$ & Discount is defined based on the task horizon $H$ --- see Table~\\ref{tab:mdp-def}. \\\\\n\\texttt{train.human\\_demos} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 3 & \\textit{Sim:} 0 \\end{tabular} & Human demos collected to seed replay buffer pre-learning \\\\\n\\texttt{train.learning\\_starts} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 5 & \\textit{Sim:} 25 \\end{tabular} & Episodes collected via uniformly sampling \\texttt{sac. action\\_range} to seed the replay buffer pre-learning (this number does not include any human demos) \\\\\n\\texttt{train.multi\\_grad\\_step} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 10 & \\textit{Sim:} 20 \\end{tabular} & Gradient steps per transition added to the buffer \\\\\n\\texttt{train.offline\\_multi\\_grad\\_step} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 0 & \\textit{Sim:} 5 \\end{tabular} & Gradient steps per transition added to the buffer for episodes collected before \\texttt{train. learning\\_starts} \\\\\n\\texttt{eval.eval\\_every} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 30 & \\textit{Sim:} 50 \\end{tabular} & Number of training episodes between evaluations \\\\\n\\texttt{eval.num\\_evaluations} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l|l@{}} \\textit{Real:} 10 & \\textit{Sim:} 64 \\end{tabular} & Number of evaluation episodes \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{table*}[htbp]\n\\caption{\\textbf{\\method Task-Specific Hyperparameters}}\n\\label{tab:sarl_task_hyperparams}\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\begin{tabular}{p{5.5cm}cc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Task} & \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}c@{}} \\textbf{\\texttt{outer\\_policy.cache\\_size}} \\\\ (also \\textbf{\\texttt{outer\\_policy.action\\_dim}}) \\end{tabular} & \\textbf{\\texttt{outer\\_policy.softmax\\_temp}} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\textbf{Real Task 1:} Move the hammer to the plate. Then, grasp the mushroom. & 64 & 0.2 \\\\\n\\addlinespace\n\\textbf{Real Task 2:} Move the banana to the pot on the right and sushi to the bowl. & 100 & 0.5 \\\\\n\\addlinespace\n\\textbf{Real Task 3:} Move the left stuffed toy to the largest bowl. & 32 & 0.1 \\\\\n\\addlinespace\n\\textbf{Real Task 4:} Move the pot lid to the towel. & 32 & 0.2 \\\\\n\\addlinespace\n\\textbf{Libero-10} & 32 & 0.03 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n {\\tiny\\texttt{\\input{prompts/real-gemini-open-ended}}}\n \\caption{\\footnotesize Prompt for open-ended real-world semantic action candidate generation}\n \\label{fig:real-open-ended}\n \\vspace{0.3cm}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n {\\tiny\\texttt{\\input{prompts/real-gemini-cache}}}\n \\caption{\\footnotesize Prompt for real-world semantic action candidate generation from cache}\n \\label{fig:real-cache}\n \\vspace{0.3cm}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n {\\tiny\\texttt{\\input{prompts/real-gemini-sp-baseline}}}\n \\caption{\\footnotesize Prompt for real-world in-context learning VLM baseline}\n \\label{fig:real-sp-baseline}\n \\vspace{0.3cm}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n {\\tiny\\texttt{\\input{prompts/sim-gemini-open-ended}}}\n \\caption{\\footnotesize Prompt for open-ended sim semantic action candidate generation}\n \\label{fig:sim-open-ended}\n \\vspace{0.3cm}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n {\\tiny\\texttt{\\input{prompts/sim-gemini-cache}}}\n \\caption{\\footnotesize Prompt for sim semantic action candidate generation from cache}\n \\label{fig:sim-cache}\n \\vspace{0.3cm}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n {\\tiny\\texttt{\\input{prompts/sim-gemini-sp-baseline}}}\n \\caption{\\footnotesize Prompt for sim in-context learning VLM baseline}\n \\label{fig:sim-sp-baseline}\n \\vspace{0.3cm}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n================================================\nFILE: conclusion.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Discussion and Limitations}\n\nWe proposed \\method, a new method for steering VLAs over their language inputs. Our results illustrate that \\method enables highly efficient learning, particularly excelling at complex, long-horizon tasks where standard steering methods are unsuccessful. We additionally disentangle that \\method's performance comes from both semantically decomposing task goals using a VLM, while also learning to ground those behaviors in the actions they induce through experience. We find \\method to be a powerful yet efficient approach for adapting generalist robot policies online, unlocking new capabilities over prior methods. \n\nThe two main limitations of \\method are speed (due to having a VLM in the loop), and the prerequisite of having VLAs that produce diverse behaviors when prompted with diverse instructions. For the former, an interesting extension of our work is studying whether VLMs are required at deployment time, or if the learned $Q$-function can generalize. For the latter, we believe the community will continue to develop stronger language-conditioned policies, making our work increasingly relevant. We hope that \\method will inspire the training of policies with better language following capabilities, enable the creation of even stronger adaptation methods by combining semantic-action space steering with complementary robot-action space steering, and eventually, in a future world with powerful and general VLAs, be a part of a standard toolkit that enables robots to autonomously adapt and solve problems in open-ended environments. \n\n\n================================================\nFILE: corl_2026.sty\n================================================\n% File: corl_2026.sty \n%\n% Latex templates for the Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL)\n%\n% This template is heavily inspired by the NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR and IEEE Transactions latex templates.\n% Hence we would like to thank: Roman Garnett and the previous mantainers of the NIPS style, Percy Liang and the previous mantainers of the ICML style, Hugo Larochelle for the ICLR style, and Michael Shell for the IEEE Transactions style.\n%\n% History:\n% 2017/04/16 - First revision by Roberto Calandra (roberto.calandra@berkeley.edu).\n%\t Main changes:\n%\t - The abstract is more compact compared to NeurIPS/ICML\n%\t - References are by default using natbib with squared numbers (e.g., [1])\n%\t - DOI fields from the bibtex are automatically converted to hyperlinks \n%\t to the corresponding page\n%\t - acknowledgments are now a command, and the corresponding subsubsection is\n%\t automatically included only in the final version\n% 2017/06/12 - Modified to use corlabbrvnat.bst, which order the reference by order of appearance in the paper\n% 2017/06/13 - fixed typo\n% 2018/05/09 - Slightly modified for CoRL 2018 by Jun Morimoto (xmorimo@atr.jp)\n% 2019/01/28 - Slightly modified for CoRL 2019 by Jun Nakanishi (jnakanis@meijo-u.ac.jp)\n% 2020/02/02 - Slightly modified for CoRL 2020 by Cynthia Matuszek (cmat@umbc.edu)\n% 2020/08/19 - Added preprint option by Roberto Calandra (rcalandra@fb.com)\n% 2021/05/06 - Slightly modified for CoRL 2021 by Gerhard Neumann (gerhard.neumann@kit.edu)\n% 2022/03/09 - Slightly modified for CoRL 2022 by Minas Liarokapis (minas.liarokapis@auckland.ac.nz)\n% 2022/03/06 - Slightly modified for CoRL 2023 by Marc Toussaint (toussaint@tu-berlin.de)\n% 2024/03/26 - Slightly modified for CoRL 2024 by David Held (dheld@andrew.cmu.edu)\n% 2026/01/10 - Slightly modified for CoRL 2026 by Yoonchang Sung (yoonchang.sung@ntu.edu.sg)\n%\n% TODO: nohyperref is not working at the moment\n% \n\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\n% Content to be changed from year to year\n\\ProvidesPackage{corl_2026}[2026/08/15 CORL2026 submission/preprint/camera-ready style file]\n\\newcommand{\\@conferenceordinal}{10th}\n\\newcommand{\\@conferenceyear}{2026}\n\\newcommand{\\@conferencelocation}{Austin TX, USA}\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% Accepted options: [final,preprint,nonatbib,nohyperref]\n\n% Declare the final option, which creates camera-ready copy\n\\newif\\if@conferencefinal\\@conferencefinalfalse\n\\DeclareOption{final}{\n \\@conferencefinaltrue\n}\n\n% Declare the preprint option, which creates a camera-ready copy without the corl footnote\n\\newif\\if@preprinttype\\@preprinttypefalse\n\\DeclareOption{preprint}{\n \\@preprinttypetrue\n}\n\n% The natbib package is loaded by default. Declaring the nonatbib option, does not load natbib in case of package clash (users can pass options to natbib via \\PassOptionsToPackage)\n\\newif\\if@natbib\\@natbibtrue\n\\DeclareOption{nonatbib}{\n \\@natbibfalse\n}\n\n% The hyperref package is loaded by default. Declaring the nohyperref option, does not load the hyperref.\n\\DeclareOption{nohyperref}{%\n \\gdef\\nohyperref{1}\n}\n\n% Activate the options\n\\ProcessOptions\\relax\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% Required packages:\n\n\\RequirePackage{lineno}\n\\RequirePackage{color}\n\n% Load natbib unless told otherwise\n\\if@natbib\n \\RequirePackage[square,numbers,sort&compress]{natbib}\n \\bibliographystyle{corlabbrvnat}\n\\fi\n\n% set page geometry\n\\RequirePackage{hyperref} % hyperlinks\n\\RequirePackage[verbose=true,letterpaper]{geometry}\n\\AtBeginDocument{\n \\newgeometry{\n textheight=9in,\n textwidth=5.5in,\n top=1in,\n headheight=12pt,\n headsep=25pt,\n footskip=30pt\n }\n \\@ifpackageloaded{fullpage}\n {\\PackageWarning{corl_2026}{fullpage package not allowed! Overwriting formatting.}}\n {}\n}\n\n\n\\ifdefined\\nohyperref\\else\\ifdefined\\hypersetup\n \\definecolor{mydarkblue}{rgb}{0,0.08,0.45}\n \\hypersetup{ %\n pdftitle={},\n pdfauthor={},\n pdfsubject={Proceedings of the \\@conferenceordinal\\/ Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL \\@conferenceyear)},\n pdfkeywords={},\n pdfborder=0 0 0,\n pdfpagemode=UseNone,\n colorlinks=true,\n linkcolor=mydarkblue,\n citecolor=mydarkblue,\n filecolor=mydarkblue,\n urlcolor=mydarkblue,\n pdfview=FitH}\n\n \\ifdefined\\isaccepted \\else\n \\hypersetup{pdfauthor={Anonymous Submission}}\n \\fi\n\\fi\\fi\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% \n\n% fonts\n\\renewcommand{\\rmdefault}{ptm}\n\\renewcommand{\\sfdefault}{phv}\n\n% Create acknowledgments -- only if the option 'final' is activated\n\\providecommand{\\acknowledgments}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\acknowledgments}[1]{%\n\\if@conferencefinal% \n\\subsubsection*{Acknowledgments} #1\n\\fi\n\\if@preprinttype% \n\\subsubsection*{Acknowledgments} #1\n\\fi\n}\n\n\n% handle tweaks for camera-ready copy vs. submission copy\n\\if@conferencefinal\n \\newcommand{\\@noticestring}{%\n \\@conferenceordinal\\/ Conference on Robot Learning\n (CoRL \\@conferenceyear), \\@conferencelocation.%\n }\n\\else\n \\if@preprinttype\n \\newcommand{\\@noticestring}{%\n % Nothing here.\n }\n \\else\n \\newcommand{\\@noticestring}{%\n Submitted to the \\@conferenceordinal\\/ Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL \\@conferenceyear). Do not distribute.%\n }\n\n % line numbers for submission\n \\linenumbers\n\n % fix incompatibilities between lineno and amsmath, if required, by\n % transparently wrapping linenomath environments around amsmath\n % environments\n \\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\@ifpackageloaded{amsmath}{%\n \\newcommand*\\patchAmsMathEnvironmentForLineno[1]{%\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname old#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\\csname #1\\endcsname\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname oldend#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\\csname end#1\\endcsname\n \\renewenvironment{#1}%\n {\\linenomath\\csname old#1\\endcsname}%\n {\\csname oldend#1\\endcsname\\endlinenomath}%\n }%\n \\newcommand*\\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno[1]{%\n \\patchAmsMathEnvironmentForLineno{#1}%\n \\patchAmsMathEnvironmentForLineno{#1*}%\n }%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{equation}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{align}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{flalign}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{alignat}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{gather}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{multline}%\n }{}\n }\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% The DOI will now automatically generate a URL link. Pretty cool!\n% + Fix for hyperref and DOI (https://www.tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2012-August/032161.html)\n%-----------------------------\n\\makeatletter\n\\providecommand{\\doi}[1]{%\n \\begingroup\n \\let\\bibinfo\\@secondoftwo\n \\urlstyle{rm}%\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/#1}{%\n doi:\\discretionary{}{}{}%\n \\nolinkurl{#1}%\n }%\n \\endgroup\n}\n% \\makeatother\n% %-----------------------------\n\n\\widowpenalty=10000\n\\clubpenalty=10000\n\\flushbottom\n\\sloppy\n\n% font sizes with reduced leading\n\\renewcommand{\\normalsize}{%\n \\@setfontsize\\normalsize\\@xpt\\@xipt\n \\abovedisplayskip 7\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 5\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus 3\\p@\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 4\\p@ \\@plus 3\\p@ \\@minus 3\\p@\n}\n\\normalsize\n\\renewcommand{\\small}{%\n \\@setfontsize\\small\\@ixpt\\@xpt\n \\abovedisplayskip 6\\p@ \\@plus 1.5\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus 2\\p@\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 3\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@\n}\n\\renewcommand{\\footnotesize}{\\@setfontsize\\footnotesize\\@ixpt\\@xpt}\n\\renewcommand{\\scriptsize}{\\@setfontsize\\scriptsize\\@viipt\\@viiipt}\n\\renewcommand{\\tiny}{\\@setfontsize\\tiny\\@vipt\\@viipt}\n\\renewcommand{\\large}{\\@setfontsize\\large\\@xiipt{14}}\n\\renewcommand{\\Large}{\\@setfontsize\\Large\\@xivpt{16}}\n\\renewcommand{\\LARGE}{\\@setfontsize\\LARGE\\@xviipt{20}}\n\\renewcommand{\\huge}{\\@setfontsize\\huge\\@xxpt{23}}\n\\renewcommand{\\Huge}{\\@setfontsize\\Huge\\@xxvpt{28}}\n\n% sections with less space\n\\providecommand{\\section}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\section}{%\n \\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}%\n {-2.0ex \\@plus -0.5ex \\@minus -0.2ex}%\n { 1.5ex \\@plus 0.3ex \\@minus 0.2ex}%\n {\\large\\bf\\raggedright}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\subsection}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\subsection}{%\n \\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}%\n {-1.8ex \\@plus -0.5ex \\@minus -0.2ex}%\n { 0.8ex \\@plus 0.2ex}%\n {\\normalsize\\bf\\raggedright}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\subsubsection}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\subsubsection}{%\n \\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}%\n {-1.5ex \\@plus -0.5ex \\@minus -0.2ex}%\n { 0.5ex \\@plus 0.2ex}%\n {\\normalsize\\bf\\raggedright}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\paragraph}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\paragraph}{%\n \\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}%\n {1.5ex \\@plus 0.5ex \\@minus 0.2ex}%\n {-1em}%\n {\\normalsize\\bf}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\subparagraph}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\subparagraph}{%\n \\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\\z@}%\n {1.5ex \\@plus 0.5ex \\@minus 0.2ex}%\n {-1em}%\n {\\normalsize\\bf}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\subsubsubsection}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\subsubsubsection}{%\n \\vskip5pt{\\noindent\\normalsize\\rm\\raggedright}%\n}\n\n% float placement\n\\renewcommand{\\topfraction }{0.85}\n\\renewcommand{\\bottomfraction }{0.4}\n\\renewcommand{\\textfraction }{0.1}\n\\renewcommand{\\floatpagefraction}{0.7}\n\n\\newlength{\\@nipsabovecaptionskip}\\setlength{\\@nipsabovecaptionskip}{7\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\@nipsbelowcaptionskip}\\setlength{\\@nipsbelowcaptionskip}{\\z@}\n\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{\\@nipsabovecaptionskip}\n\\setlength{\\belowcaptionskip}{\\@nipsbelowcaptionskip}\n\n% swap above/belowcaptionskip lengths for tables\n\\renewenvironment{table}\n {\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{\\@nipsbelowcaptionskip}%\n \\setlength{\\belowcaptionskip}{\\@nipsabovecaptionskip}%\n \\@float{table}}\n {\\end@float}\n\n% footnote formatting\n\\setlength{\\footnotesep }{6.65\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\skip\\footins}{9\\p@ \\@plus 4\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\\renewcommand{\\footnoterule}{\\kern-3\\p@ \\hrule width 12pc \\kern 2.6\\p@}\n\\setcounter{footnote}{0}\n\n% paragraph formatting\n\\setlength{\\parindent}{\\z@}\n\\setlength{\\parskip }{5.5\\p@}\n\n% list formatting\n\\setlength{\\topsep }{4\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\partopsep }{1\\p@ \\@plus 0.5\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\itemsep }{2\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\parsep }{2\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\leftmargin }{3pc}\n\\setlength{\\leftmargini }{\\leftmargin}\n\\setlength{\\leftmarginii }{2em}\n\\setlength{\\leftmarginiii}{1.5em}\n\\setlength{\\leftmarginiv }{1.0em}\n\\setlength{\\leftmarginv }{0.5em}\n\\def\\@listi {\\leftmargin\\leftmargini}\n\\def\\@listii {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 2\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@\n \\parsep 1\\p@ \\@plus 0.5\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@\n \\itemsep \\parsep}\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 1\\p@ \\@plus 0.5\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\partopsep 0.5\\p@ \\@plus 0\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@\n \\itemsep \\topsep}\n\\def\\@listiv {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiv\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listv {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginv\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listvi {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginvi\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginvi\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\n% create title\n\\providecommand{\\maketitle}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\maketitle}{%\n \\par\n \\begingroup\n \\renewcommand{\\thefootnote}{\\fnsymbol{footnote}}\n % for perfect author name centering\n \\renewcommand{\\@makefnmark}{\\hbox to \\z@{$^{\\@thefnmark}$\\hss}}\n % The footnote-mark was overlapping the footnote-text,\n % added the following to fix this problem (MK)\n \\long\\def\\@makefntext##1{%\n \\parindent 1em\\noindent\n \\hbox to 1.8em{\\hss $\\m@th ^{\\@thefnmark}$}##1\n }\n \\thispagestyle{empty}\n \\@maketitle\n \\@thanks\n \\@notice\n \\endgroup\n \\let\\maketitle\\relax\n \\let\\thanks\\relax\n}\n\n% rules for title box at top of first page\n\\newcommand{\\@toptitlebar}{\n \\hrule height 4\\p@\n \\vskip 0.25in\n \\vskip -\\parskip%\n}\n\\newcommand{\\@bottomtitlebar}{\n \\vskip 0.29in\n \\vskip -\\parskip\n \\hrule height 1\\p@\n \\vskip 0.09in%\n}\n\n%% keywords as first class citizens\n\\def\\keywords#1{%\n% \\ifdefined\\isaccepted \\else\n% \\par {\\bf Keywords:} #1%\n% \\fi\n% \\ifdefined\\nohyperref\\else\\ifdefined\\hypersetup\n% \\hypersetup{pdfkeywords={#1}}\n% \\fi\\fi\n \\ifdefined\\isaccepted \\else\n \\begin{quote}\n \\textbf{Keywords:} #1%\n \\end{quote}\n \\fi\n \\ifdefined\\nohyperref\\else\\ifdefined\\hypersetup\n \\hypersetup{pdfkeywords={#1}}\n \\fi\\fi\n}\n\n\n% create title (includes both anonymized and non-anonymized versions)\n\\providecommand{\\@maketitle}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\@maketitle}{%\n \\vbox{%\n \\hsize\\textwidth\n \\linewidth\\hsize\n \\vskip 0.1in\n% \\@toptitlebar\n \\centering\n {\\LARGE\\bf \\@title\\par}\n% \\@bottomtitlebar\n \\if@conferencefinal\n \\def\\And{%\n \\end{tabular}\\hfil\\linebreak[0]\\hfil%\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\\ignorespaces%\n }\n \\def\\AND{%\n \\end{tabular}\\hfil\\linebreak[4]\\hfil%\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\\ignorespaces%\n }\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\\@author\\end{tabular}%\n \\else\n \\if@preprinttype\n \\def\\And{%\n \\end{tabular}\\hfil\\linebreak[0]\\hfil%\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\\ignorespaces%\n }\n \\def\\AND{%\n \\end{tabular}\\hfil\\linebreak[4]\\hfil%\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\\ignorespaces%\n }\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\\@author\\end{tabular}%\n \\else\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\n Anonymous Author(s) \\\\\n Affiliation \\\\\n Address \\\\\n \\texttt{email} \\\\\n \\end{tabular}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\vskip 0.3in \\@minus 0.1in\n }\n}\n\n% add conference notice to bottom of first page\n\\newcommand{\\ftype@noticebox}{8}\n\\newcommand{\\@notice}{%\n % give a bit of extra room back to authors on first page\n \\enlargethispage{2\\baselineskip}%\n \\@float{noticebox}[b]%\n \\footnotesize\\@noticestring%\n \\end@float%\n}\n\n% abstract styling\n\\renewenvironment{abstract}%\n{%\n% \\vskip 0.075in%\n% \\centerline%\n% {\\large\\bf Abstract}%\n% \\vspace{0.5ex}%\n \\begin{quote}%\n \\textbf{Abstract:}%\n}\n{\n \\par%\n \\vskip 1ex%\n% \\ifdefined\\keywords\n% \\textbf{Keywords:}%\n% \\@keywords%\n% \\else\n% \\fi\n \\end{quote}%\n}\n\n\\endinput\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: experiments.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Experiments}\\label{sec:experiments}\n\n\\begin{figure*}\n \\centering\n \\vspace{-1.5em}\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{figsv2/real-graphs_cropped.pdf}\n \\caption{Across four complex, real-world tasks, learning over semantic actions with \\method enables the best improvement of generalist policy behavior in deployment. In particular, \\method enables new capabilities over prior steering methods such as DSRL \\cite{wagenmaker2025steering} and Residual RL \\cite{xiao2025self, ankile2025imitation, xu2026rl}, as these methods are fundamentally constrained by the base policy's performance under the task's original prompt. \n %In particular, both DSRL and Residual RL perform best on Task 4, which has the least complex task goal. \n In addition, \\method outperforms an in-context learning VLM baseline (ICL VLM) \\cite{chen2026steerable}, since VLMs struggle to ground semantic actions in physical behaviors. Each data-point represents $10$ evaluations.} \n \\label{fig:real-graphs}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure*}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\linewidth]{figs/sim-graphs-compressed-paul_cropped.pdf}\n \\caption{\\method outperforms prior methods for deployment-time adaptation --- DSRL \\cite{wagenmaker2025steering}, Residual RL \\cite{xiao2025self, ankile2025imitation, xu2026rl}, and in-context learning with VLMs \\cite{chen2026steerable} --- on long-horizon Libero-10 tasks \\cite{liu2023libero}. \\method successfully adapts a policy \\cite{jain2025polaris} on five tasks, and matches performance on another already close to solved. Four tasks remain unsolved by any method. \n Each graphed data-point represents $64$ evaluations and standard error over $3$ seeds.\\loose}\n \\label{fig:sim-graphs}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\nOur experiments evaluate \\method both as a sample-efficient algorithm for adapting VLA priors and as a method for steering VLAs through high-level language instructions. We aim to answer three questions. First, can \\method's semantic exploration space efficiently adapt VLAs to solve new tasks? Second, compared to traditional action-space RL methods,\n%(e.g., residual RL \\cite{xiao2025self, ankile2025imitation, xu2026rl} or latent-noise space steering \\cite{wagenmaker2025steering})\ndoes operating in a lifted, semantic prompt space allow \\method to efficiently solve complex, long-horizon tasks where these prior methods may struggle? Finally, does optimizing prompts via online RL outperform non-RL VLA prompting methods (e.g., in-context learning, ICL, with VLMs), by explicitly grounding semantic instructions in the physical behaviors they induce? We investigate these questions across a suite of challenging multi-step tasks within both the Libero simulation benchmark \\cite{liu2023libero} and with a real-world WidowX robot.\\loose\n\n\\subsection{Experimental Setup}\n\\label{subsec:experimental-setup}\n\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\linewidth]{figsv2/task-suite-horizontal_cropped.pdf}\n \\caption{We test our approach on four complex, long-horizon tasks on the WidowX robot, illustrated above, along with ten tasks on the simulated Libero-10 benchmark \\cite{liu2023libero}. \n %These tasks require composing skills seen during pretraining, making them a good evaluation domain for algorithms that aim to adapt pre-trained generalist policies.\n } \n \\label{fig:task-suite}\n \\vspace{-1.5em}\n\\end{figure}\n\nWe evaluate \\method on the simulated Libero-10 benchmark \\cite{liu2023libero} and four challenging real-world WidowX tasks \\cite{walke2023bridgedata} shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:task-suite}. These tasks are specifically designed to be long-horizon, and involve multiple steps. In fact, the base VLA policies we use---based on $\\pi_{0.5}$ \\cite{intelligence2025pi_}, and finetuned on the Libero-90 \\cite{liu2023libero} and Bridge v2 datasets \\cite{walke2023bridgedata}---perform poorly on these tasks, only achieving significant performance on one task in each setting. Consequently, these tasks are a good evaluation domain for RL methods that leverage pre-trained generalist policies: while they contain many atomic behaviors that are well-represented in Libero and Bridge's training sets, they reveal the difficulty of applying these behaviors directly to complex new tasks. \n%This is exactly the challenge that our method aims to solve. \n\nIn addition to the original language prompt space for the VLA, in Libero we also introduce a ``reset-to-home'' command that resets the robot arm to its starting state. Note that this is straightforward to implement on a real robot (e.g. we simply reset the robot's joint positions), and the capacity to seamlessly integrate such auxiliary controllers highlights a unique strength of our approach.\n\n\nWe compare \\method against two classes of baseline approaches. As VLA RL baselines, we consider \\emph{Diffusion Steering via Reinforcement Learning (DSRL)} \\cite{wagenmaker2025steering}, which learns to steer diffusion policies in their latent-noise space, and \\emph{Residual RL} \\cite{xiao2025self, ankile2025imitation, xu2026rl}, which learns a residual policy that predicts small corrective actions which are added to the base policy before execution. For both baselines we rely on standard implementations. To the best of our knowledge, all existing evaluations of DSRL and Residual RL use a \\emph{fixed} VLA prompt. Therefore, for these comparisons, we provide these prior methods with the task prompts indicated in Figure~\\ref{fig:task-suite} for real-world experiments, and the standard Libero task prompts in simulation.\nFor our second class of baselines, we explore approaches that adaptively adjust the VLA's prompt. In particular, we consider an in-context learning-based VLM approach that processes past observations in-context and uses this information to select prompts that steer the VLA to task completion \\cite{chen2026steerable, shah2025learning}. For \\method, we utilize the VLM-based restriction of $\\cAlang$ outlined in Section~\\ref{subsec:SARL-algo}. To simplify the prompt space further, the algorithm caches and reuses the first $N \\in \\{ 32, 64, 100 \\}$ prompts proposed by the VLM. We find this to produce sufficiently expressive behaviors to enable effective learning. \n\nFinally, for real-world WidowX experiments, we collect three full demonstrations per task and seed them into \\method and Residual RL's replay buffers prior to training. Because DSRL inherently cannot ingest such demonstrations---it learns over latent-noise space, rather than robot action space, where the demonstrations are given---it is evaluated without them. To collect these demonstrations, an operator merely provides the VLA with periodic language instructions. Note that the ease of collecting such demonstrations is a core advantage of language-based steering. Further experimental details are provided in Appendix~\\ref{app:hyperparams}.\n\n\\subsection{\\method Enables Efficient Adaptation of Generalist Policies}\n\nWe first evaluate \\method's ability to learn effective task-solving behaviors compared to existing methods for improving VLAs in deployment. As shown in Figures~\\ref{fig:real-graphs} and~\\ref{fig:sim-graphs}, \\method is able to significantly improve the performance of the base VLA across Libero-10 and the four long-horizon real-world tasks we consider---in both settings, \\method is able to improve the VLA's initial success rate of near 0\\% under the task prompt up to 80\\% after only 60-100 online episodes. This suggests that the VLA's prompts are an expressive and high-quality space for exploration and task-learning, and that by modulating the language prompt, we can elicit task-solving behaviors that naive prompting fails to exhibit. \n\nNotably, our approach improves over traditional action-space RL methods, such as DSRL and Residual RL, which are unable to learn at all on several tasks. \\method also significantly outperforms the ICL VLM baseline, which adaptively selects VLA prompts by in-context learning over a history of interactions. These results highlight \\method's effectiveness as a method for adaptation on real-world robots, enabling novel task-solving abilities in VLAs. \n\nWe emphasize that the tasks in our evaluation suite are unique in their complexity and horizon for deployment-time adaptation compared to prior works \\cite{wagenmaker2025steering, xu2026rl, xiao2025self}. Our tasks, which by design have multiple stages and require invoking sequences of skills seen during training on Bridge v2 (real experiments) \\cite{walke2023bridgedata} and Libero (sim experiments) \\cite{liu2023libero}, are not able to be solved by action-space steering methods, such as DSRL and Residual RL. The unique ability of \\method to solve these tasks highlights that it unlocks a completely new capability over these prior steering methods.\n\\vspace{-0.5em}\n\n\\subsection{\\method vs Action-Space RL: Editing Prompts Unlocks Fundamentally New Adaptation Abilities}\n\n\\begin{figure*}\n \\vspace{-1.5em}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\linewidth]{figsv2/sarl-vs-base-v2_cropped.pdf}\n \\caption{On complex, long-horizon tasks, the base policy fails when zero-shot prompted. \\method solves them through learned prompting, sequencing skills covered under the pretraining distribution.}\n \\label{fig:base-vs-sarl}\n \\vspace{-1.0em}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\nAs shown in Figures~\\ref{fig:real-graphs} and~\\ref{fig:sim-graphs}, \\method significantly outperforms standard RL steering methods (DSRL and Residual RL) that operate over robot actions directly. We hypothesize that this is because (1) existing steering methods are constrained to a single task prompt, and (2) the VLA's action distribution under this task prompt does not adequately cover the diversity of actions needed to solve the task, making action-based steering ineffective. \n\nIndeed, when evaluated on our multi-step task suite and prompted zero-shot, the base policy's action distribution tends to collapse into entirely incorrect modes, far from an optimal policy's distribution. A qualitative example is shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:base-vs-sarl}, where a VLA instructed to ``move the hammer to the plate. then, grasp the mushroom'' (Row 1), instead moves the mushroom to the plate and grabs a spoon. \n\nThis is catastrophic for methods that steer over actions directly. For instance, DSRL can filter to find good actions from the base policy's distribution, but cannot synthesize fundamentally new ones. Similarly, residual RL is restricted to exploring a narrow funnel around the base policy's actions. Consequently, these baselines only learn effectively when the base policy already exhibits close to successful behaviors on the underlying task (e.g., Libero Task 5 or real-world Task 4), but cannot recover from the significantly incorrect behavior modes observed when task prompts are out-of-support.\nIn contrast, \\method is not constrained in this way. By modulating prompts, \\method explores regions of the VLA’s behavioral prior that remain entirely inaccessible to action-only steering methods. This capability is critical for solving long-horizon tasks, and \\method uniquely drives significant progress across five Libero-10 tasks, along with all tested WidowX tasks. \n\n\\subsection{\\method vs VLM Prompting: Instruction Grounding is as Important as Decomposition}\n\n\\begin{figure*}\n \\vspace{-1.5em}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\linewidth]{figsv2/sarl-vs-vlm-v2_cropped.pdf}\n \\caption{Across tasks, an in-context learning VLM \\cite{chen2026steerable} selects instructions that are semantically meaningful, but lack grounding in physical behaviors, leading to task failures. By contrast, \\method's learned semantic actions correctly navigate scenarios where choosing the right instruction is critical. Additional examples can be found in Figure~\\ref{fig:vlm-vs-sarl-full}.}\n \\label{fig:vlm-vs-sarl}\n \\vspace{-1.5em}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\nOur results show that \\method enables highly efficient learning of complex, long-horizon tasks even when task-prompts fall outside the base policy's support. To disentangle whether this capability stems from more than just instruction decomposition (ie. breaking down task prompts into sequences of short-horizon commands), we consider a closer comparison of our approach against its VLM baseline \\cite{chen2026steerable}, which selects instructions via in-context learning (ICL) over interaction history. \n\nAs shown in Figures~\\ref{fig:real-graphs} and~\\ref{fig:sim-graphs}, the VLM baseline outperforms the zero-shot base policy, confirming that task decomposition does improve performance. However, across the board, \\method significantly outperforms the VLM. Qualitative examples in Figure~\\ref{fig:vlm-vs-sarl} illustrate why: the VLM frequently selects commands that seem semantically plausible but still cause execution failures. For instance, in Row 1, the VLM is unable to pick the hammer (likely an OOD object): referencing the ``hammer\" by name mistakenly causes the VLA to grasp a spoon, and only spatial commands (e.g., ``move right'') successfully guide the VLA. In another instance (Row 2), the VLM selects an incorrect verb (``drop''), causing the VLA to prematurely release a piece of sushi before reaching the target. While the VLM can learn in-context, it cannot recover from such failures in a single episode. By contrast, through many episodes of experience, \\method is able to learn the grounded behavior induced by each language command, and uses this knowledge to select language commands appropriately. Our results highlight that this ability is critical for performant adaptation.\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: intro.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Introduction}\n\nVision-language-action (VLA) models can learn broad skill repertoires from pretraining~\\citep{lbm, black2024pi0, kim2024openvla, intelligence2025pi_}, providing powerful priors over plausible robot behaviors. However, leveraging VLAs to solve new tasks remains challenging. While we could directly prompt models to carry out new tasks of interest, this strategy requires models to not only have the necessary skills in their repertoire, but to also deploy them correctly. This is especially a challenge for complex and long-horizon tasks --- models must not only break down the semantics of such long-horizon tasks into executable, atomic behaviors, but also \\emph{ground} these behaviors in skills the robot can perform successfully. As such, directly prompting VLAs to carry out novel complex tasks typically fails. How can we better leverage the prior knowledge in general-purpose robot policies to learn to solve these tasks effectively? \n\nOur key insight is that learning to modulate a VLA's prompts through reinforcement learning (RL) is an effective way to probe VLA priors to efficiently learn to solve new tasks. In particular, modulating language inputs elicits skills already within a VLA's repertoire, yielding constrained, high-quality exploration. By grounding each prompt in the behavior it induces through real-world interaction, these skills can be composed to solve tasks beyond a VLA's zero-shot capabilities. Unlike prior robotic RL approaches that operate at the \\emph{robot action} level, we propose learning at the \\emph{semantic} level, enabling a more effective use of the behavioral priors encoded in VLAs. For example, to train an omelet-making robot, we can simply learn semantic language commands to steer the VLA: ``turn on the stove\", ``open the fridge\", ``grab the egg\", and so on, rather than needing to learn the precise low-level robot actions required to execute each of these skills. Reusing pre-trained skills rather than discovering new ones from scratch presents a potentially much easier learning problem, since the search space can be naturally constrained to task-appropriate behaviors using the semantics of the task, but still allows for improvement over the base policy. For VLAs with sufficiently broad language-inducible skill sets, language-based steering produces exactly the kind of exploration RL demands: highly expressive yet always grounded in reasonable actions, enabling efficient learning.\n\nOur proposed approach, \\methodspelledout (\\method), instantiates this capability through an online RL loop that \\emph{treats the VLA's language instructions as an action space}. \\method uses interactions with the world to learn which language prompts will actually lead the VLA to complete the task of interest. By treating the VLA's language prompt as an ``action,'' we can lift the learning problem from low-level robot action space to semantic language space. By grounding prompts in real-world experience, we can efficiently refine which of them actually lead to success.\n\nOur core contribution is an RL method that learns over the \\emph{language inputs} into a VLA, enabling substantially more structured exploration and faster learning. Our results---both in simulation and on real-world robots---highlight that \\method unlocks fundamentally new capabilities, enabling us to efficiently learn to solve complex, long-horizon tasks that are infeasible for 1) existing RL approaches, 2) zero-shot VLA deployment, and 3) VLAs deployed with high-level language steering (e.g., from a VLM with in-context learning). Finally, we investigate why \\method learns effectively, and find that it is not only because \\method decomposes complex goals into achievable skills, but that \\method also learns a grounded mapping between semantic actions and the physical behaviors they induce. \n\n\\begin{figure*}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\linewidth]{figsv2/teaser_cropped.pdf}\n \\caption{\n Steering VLA priors at deployment to solve complex, long-horizon tasks is challenging. To overcome this, we propose optimizing VLA language inputs via RL. The resulting \\emph{semantic} action space probes skills already encoded in VLAs from pretraining, yielding expressive exploration and efficient adaptation. However, not all induced behaviors make task progress: by learning to decompose complex tasks into \\emph{grounded} skills, our method identifies effective task-solving prompts and enables real-robot adaptation in under 100 episodes.\n }\n \\label{fig:teaser}\n \\vspace{-1.0em}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.bib\n================================================\n@article{black2024pi0,\n title={$\\pi_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control},\n author={Black, Kevin and Brown, Noah and Driess, Danny and Esmail, Adnan and Equi, Michael and Finn, Chelsea and Fusai, Niccolo and Groom, Lachy and Hausman, Karol and Ichter, Brian and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24164},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{kim2024openvla,\n title={Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model},\n author={Kim, Moo Jin and Pertsch, Karl and Karamcheti, Siddharth and Xiao, Ted and Balakrishna, Ashwin and Nair, Suraj and Rafailov, Rafael and Foster, Ethan and Lam, Grace and Sanketi, Pannag and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{lbm,\n title={A careful examination of large behavior models for multitask dexterous manipulation},\n author={Barreiros, Jose and Beaulieu, Andrew and Bhat, Aditya and Cory, Rick and Cousineau, Eric and Dai, Hongkai and Fang, Ching-Hsin and Hashimoto, Kunimatsu and Irshad, Muhammad Zubair and Itkina, Masha and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.05331},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{gao2025taxonomy,\n title={A taxonomy for evaluating generalist robot policies},\n author={Gao, Jensen and Belkhale, Suneel and Dasari, Sudeep and Balakrishna, Ashwin and Shah, Dhruv and Sadigh, Dorsa},\n journal={arXiv e-prints},\n pages={arXiv--2503},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{kim2026molmospaces,\n title={Molmospaces: A large-scale open ecosystem for robot navigation and manipulation},\n author={Kim, Yejin and Pumacay, Wilbert and Rayyan, Omar and Argus, Max and Han, Winson and VanderBilt, Eli and Salvador, Jordi and Deshpande, Abhay and Hendrix, Rose and Jauhri, Snehal and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.11337},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{walke2023bridgedata,\n title={Bridgedata v2: A dataset for robot learning at scale},\n author={Walke, Homer Rich and Black, Kevin and Zhao, Tony Z and Vuong, Quan and Zheng, Chongyi and Hansen-Estruch, Philippe and He, Andre Wang and Myers, Vivek and Kim, Moo Jin and Du, Max and others},\n booktitle={Conference on Robot Learning},\n pages={1723--1736},\n year={2023},\n organization={PMLR}\n}\n\n@article{ahn2022can,\n title={Do as i can, not as i say: Grounding language in robotic affordances},\n author={Ahn, Michael and Brohan, Anthony and Brown, Noah and Chebotar, Yevgen and Cortes, Omar and David, Byron and Finn, Chelsea and Fu, Chuyuan and Gopalakrishnan, Keerthana and Hausman, Karol and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.01691},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{kwok2026scalingcover,\n title={Scaling Verification Can Be More Effective than Scaling Policy Learning for Vision-Language-Action Alignment},\n author={Kwok, Jacky and Zhang, Xilun and Xu, Mengdi and Liu, Yuejiang and Mirhoseini, Azalia and Finn, Chelsea and Pavone, Marco},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12281},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{mu2022improvingGrefenstette,\n title={Improving intrinsic exploration with language abstractions},\n author={Mu, Jesse and Zhong, Victor and Raileanu, Roberta and Jiang, Minqi and Goodman, Noah and Rockt{\\\"a}schel, Tim and Grefenstette, Edward},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={35},\n pages={33947--33960},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{bjorck2025gr00t,\n title={Gr00t n1: An open foundation model for generalist humanoid robots},\n author={Bjorck, Johan and Casta{\\~n}eda, Fernando and Cherniadev, Nikita and Da, Xingye and Ding, Runyu and Fan, Linxi and Fang, Yu and Fox, Dieter and Hu, Fengyuan and Huang, Spencer and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14734},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{brohan2022rt,\n title={Rt-1: Robotics transformer for real-world control at scale},\n author={Brohan, Anthony and Brown, Noah and Carbajal, Justice and Chebotar, Yevgen and Dabis, Joseph and Finn, Chelsea and Gopalakrishnan, Keerthana and Hausman, Karol and Herzog, Alex and Hsu, Jasmine and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06817},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{gu2023rt,\n title={Rt-trajectory: Robotic task generalization via hindsight trajectory sketches},\n author={Gu, Jiayuan and Kirmani, Sean and Wohlhart, Paul and Lu, Yao and Arenas, Montserrat Gonzalez and Rao, Kanishka and Yu, Wenhao and Fu, Chuyuan and Gopalakrishnan, Keerthana and Xu, Zhuo and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01977},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{team2024octo,\n title={Octo: An open-source generalist robot policy},\n author={Team, Octo Model and Ghosh, Dibya and Walke, Homer and Pertsch, Karl and Black, Kevin and Mees, Oier and Dasari, Sudeep and Hejna, Joey and Kreiman, Tobias and Xu, Charles and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12213},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{intelligence2025pi_,\n title={$\\pi_{0.5}$: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalization},\n author={{Physical Intelligence} and Black, Kevin and Brown, Noah and Darpinian, James and Dhabalia, Karan and Driess, Danny and Esmail, Adnan and Equi, Michael and Finn, Chelsea and Fusai, Niccolo and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16054},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{narasimhan2018grounding,\n title={Grounding language for transfer in deep reinforcement learning},\n author={Narasimhan, Karthik and Barzilay, Regina and Jaakkola, Tommi},\n journal={Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research},\n volume={63},\n pages={849--874},\n year={2018}\n}\n\n@article{branavan2012learning,\n title={Learning to win by reading manuals in a monte-carlo framework},\n author={Branavan, SRK and Silver, David and Barzilay, Regina},\n journal={Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research},\n volume={43},\n pages={661--704},\n year={2012}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{misra2017mapping,\n title={Mapping instructions and visual observations to actions with reinforcement learning},\n author={Misra, Dipendra and Langford, John and Artzi, Yoav},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 2017 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing},\n pages={1004--1015},\n year={2017}\n}\n\n@article{hermann2017grounded,\n title={Grounded language learning in a simulated 3d world},\n author={Hermann, Karl Moritz and Hill, Felix and Green, Simon and Wang, Fumin and Faulkner, Ryan and Soyer, Hubert and Szepesvari, David and Czarnecki, Wojciech Marian and Jaderberg, Max and Teplyashin, Denis and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.06551},\n year={2017}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{du2023guiding,\n title={Guiding pretraining in reinforcement learning with large language models},\n author={Du, Yuqing and Watkins, Olivia and Wang, Zihan and Colas, C{\\'e}dric and Darrell, Trevor and Abbeel, Pieter and Gupta, Abhishek and Andreas, Jacob},\n booktitle={International Conference on Machine Learning},\n pages={8657--8677},\n year={2023},\n organization={PMLR}\n}\n@article{carta2022eager,\n title={Eager: Asking and answering questions for automatic reward shaping in language-guided rl},\n author={Carta, Thomas and Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves and Sigaud, Olivier and Lamprier, Sylvain},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={35},\n pages={12478--12490},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{tam2022semantic,\n title={Semantic exploration from language abstractions and pretrained representations},\n author={Tam, Allison and Rabinowitz, Neil and Lampinen, Andrew and Roy, Nicholas A and Chan, Stephanie and Strouse, DJ and Wang, Jane and Banino, Andrea and Hill, Felix},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={35},\n pages={25377--25389},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{goyal2019using,\n title={Using natural language for reward shaping in reinforcement learning},\n author={Goyal, Prasoon and Niekum, Scott and Mooney, Raymond J},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.02020},\n year={2019}\n}\n\n@article{mirchandani2021ella,\n title={Ella: Exploration through learned language abstraction},\n author={Mirchandani, Suvir and Karamcheti, Siddharth and Sadigh, Dorsa},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={34},\n pages={29529--29540},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@article{mu2022improving,\n title={Improving intrinsic exploration with language abstractions},\n author={Mu, Jesse and Zhong, Victor and Raileanu, Roberta and Jiang, Minqi and Goodman, Noah and Rockt{\\\"a}schel, Tim and Grefenstette, Edward},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={35},\n pages={33947--33960},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{peng2024learning,\n title={Learning with language-guided state abstractions},\n author={Peng, Andi and Sucholutsky, Ilia and Li, Belinda and Sumers, Theodore and Griffiths, Thomas L and Andreas, Jacob and Shah, Julie},\n booktitle={International Conference on Learning Representations},\n volume={2024},\n pages={38711--38744},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n\n@article{zha2026lap,\n title={Lap: Language-action pre-training enables zero-shot cross-embodiment transfer},\n author={Zha, Lihan and Hancock, Asher J and Zhang, Mingtong and Yin, Tenny and Huang, Yixuan and Shah, Dhruv and Ren, Allen Z and Majumdar, Anirudha},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.10556},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{team2025gemini,\n title={Gemini robotics: Bringing ai into the physical world},\n author={Team, Gemini Robotics and Abeyruwan, Saminda and Ainslie, Joshua and Alayrac, Jean-Baptiste and Arenas, Montserrat Gonzalez and Armstrong, Travis and Balakrishna, Ashwin and Baruch, Robert and Bauza, Maria and Blokzijl, Michiel and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20020},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{liu2025rdt,\n title={Rdt-1b: a diffusion foundation model for bimanual manipulation},\n author={Liu, Songming and Wu, Lingxuan and Li, Bangguo and Tan, Hengkai and Chen, Huayu and Wang, Zhengyi and Xu, Ke and Su, Hang and Zhu, Jun},\n booktitle={International Conference on Learning Representations},\n volume={2025},\n pages={29982--30009},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@misc{johannink2018residual,\n title={Residual Reinforcement Learning for Robot Control}, \n author={Tobias Johannink and Shikhar Bahl and Ashvin Nair and Jianlan Luo and Avinash Kumar and Matthias Loskyll and Juan Aparicio Ojea and Eugen Solowjow and Sergey Levine},\n year={2018},\n eprint={1812.03201},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.RO},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.03201}, \n}\n\n@inproceedings{ankile2025imitation,\n title={From imitation to refinement-residual rl for precise assembly},\n author={Ankile, Lars and Simeonov, Anthony and Shenfeld, Idan and Torne, Marcel and Agrawal, Pulkit},\n booktitle={2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)},\n pages={01--08},\n year={2025},\n organization={IEEE}\n}\n\n@article{yuan2024policy,\n title={Policy Decorator: Model-Agnostic Online Refinement for Large Policy Model},\n author={Yuan, Xiu and Mu, Tongzhou and Tao, Stone and Fang, Yunhao and Zhang, Mengke and Su, Hao},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13630},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{julg2025refined,\n title={Refined Policy Distillation: From VLA Generalists to RL Experts},\n author={J{\\\"u}lg, Tobias and Burgard, Wolfram and Walter, Florian},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05833},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{dong2025expo,\n title={EXPO: Stable Reinforcement Learning with Expressive Policies},\n author={Dong, Perry and Li, Qiyang and Sadigh, Dorsa and Finn, Chelsea},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.07986},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{xiao2025self,\n title={Self-improving vision-language-action models with data generation via residual rl},\n author={Xiao, Wenli and Lin, Haotian and Peng, Andy and Xue, Haoru and He, Tairan and Xie, Yuqi and Hu, Fengyuan and Wu, Jimmy and Luo, Zhengyi and Fan, Linxi and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.00091},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{wagenmaker2025steering,\n author = {Wagenmaker, Andrew and Nakamoto, Mitsuhiko and Zhang, Yunchu and Park, Seohong and Yagoub, Waleed and Nagabandi, Anusha and Gupta, Abhishek and Levine, Sergey},\n title = {Steering Your Diffusion Policy with Latent Space Reinforcement Learning},\n journal = {Conference on Robot Learning},\n year = {2025},\n}\n\n@article{amin2025pi,\n title={$\\pi^*_{0.6}$: a VLA That Learns From Experience},\n author={Amin, Ali and Aniceto, Raichelle and Balakrishna, Ashwin and Black, Kevin and Conley, Ken and Connors, Grace and Darpinian, James and Dhabalia, Karan and DiCarlo, Jared and Driess, Danny and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.14759},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{mark2024policy,\n title={Policy agnostic rl: Offline rl and online rl fine-tuning of any class and backbone},\n author={Mark, Max Sobol and Gao, Tian and Sampaio, Georgia Gabriela and Srirama, Mohan Kumar and Sharma, Archit and Finn, Chelsea and Kumar, Aviral},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06685},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{nakamoto2024steering,\n title={Steering your generalists: Improving robotic foundation models via value guidance},\n author={Nakamoto, Mitsuhiko and Mees, Oier and Kumar, Aviral and Levine, Sergey},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13816},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{chen2025conrft,\n title={Conrft: A reinforced fine-tuning method for vla models via consistency policy},\n author={Chen, Yuhui and Tian, Shuai and Liu, Shugao and Zhou, Yingting and Li, Haoran and Zhao, Dongbin},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.05450},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{hu2025flare,\n title={Flare: Achieving masterful and adaptive robot policies with large-scale reinforcement learning fine-tuning},\n author={Hu, Jiaheng and Hendrix, Rose and Farhadi, Ali and Kembhavi, Aniruddha and Mart{\\'\\i}n-Mart{\\'\\i}n, Roberto and Stone, Peter and Zeng, Kuo-Hao and Ehsani, Kiana},\n booktitle={2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)},\n pages={3617--3624},\n year={2025},\n organization={IEEE}\n}\n\n@article{guo2025improving,\n title={Improving vision-language-action model with online reinforcement learning},\n author={Guo, Yanjiang and Zhang, Jianke and Chen, Xiaoyu and Ji, Xiang and Wang, Yen-Jen and Hu, Yucheng and Chen, Jianyu},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.16664},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{lu2025vla,\n title={Vla-rl: Towards masterful and general robotic manipulation with scalable reinforcement learning},\n author={Lu, Guanxing and Guo, Wenkai and Zhang, Chubin and Zhou, Yuheng and Jiang, Haonan and Gao, Zifeng and Tang, Yansong and Wang, Ziwei},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18719},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{liu2025can,\n title={What can rl bring to vla generalization? an empirical study},\n author={Liu, Jijia and Gao, Feng and Wei, Bingwen and Chen, Xinlei and Liao, Qingmin and Wu, Yi and Yu, Chao and Wang, Yu},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.19789},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n\n@article{nachum2018data,\n title={Data-efficient hierarchical reinforcement learning},\n author={Nachum, Ofir and Gu, Shixiang Shane and Lee, Honglak and Levine, Sergey},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={31},\n year={2018}\n}\n\n@article{kulkarni2016hierarchical,\n title={Hierarchical deep reinforcement learning: Integrating temporal abstraction and intrinsic motivation},\n author={Kulkarni, Tejas D and Narasimhan, Karthik and Saeedi, Ardavan and Tenenbaum, Josh},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={29},\n year={2016}\n}\n\n@article{daniel2016hierarchical,\n title={Hierarchical relative entropy policy search},\n author={Daniel, Christian and Neumann, Gerhard and Kroemer, Oliver and Peters, Jan},\n journal={Journal of Machine Learning Research},\n volume={17},\n number={93},\n pages={1--50},\n year={2016}\n}\n\n@article{gehring2021hierarchical,\n title={Hierarchical skills for efficient exploration},\n author={Gehring, Jonas and Synnaeve, Gabriel and Krause, Andreas and Usunier, Nicolas},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={34},\n pages={11553--11564},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{riedmiller2018learning,\n title={Learning by playing solving sparse reward tasks from scratch},\n author={Riedmiller, Martin and Hafner, Roland and Lampe, Thomas and Neunert, Michael and Degrave, Jonas and Wiele, Tom and Mnih, Vlad and Heess, Nicolas and Springenberg, Jost Tobias},\n booktitle={International conference on machine learning},\n pages={4344--4353},\n year={2018},\n organization={PMLR}\n}\n\n@article{peng2017deeploco,\n title={Deeploco: Dynamic locomotion skills using hierarchical deep reinforcement learning},\n author={Peng, Xue Bin and Berseth, Glen and Yin, KangKang and Van De Panne, Michiel},\n journal={Acm transactions on graphics (tog)},\n volume={36},\n number={4},\n pages={1--13},\n year={2017},\n publisher={ACM New York, NY, USA}\n}\n\n@article{merel2018neural,\n title={Neural probabilistic motor primitives for humanoid control},\n author={Merel, Josh and Hasenclever, Leonard and Galashov, Alexandre and Ahuja, Arun and Pham, Vu and Wayne, Greg and Teh, Yee Whye and Heess, Nicolas},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.11711},\n year={2018}\n}\n\n@article{singh2020parrot,\n title={Parrot: Data-driven behavioral priors for reinforcement learning},\n author={Singh, Avi and Liu, Huihan and Zhou, Gaoyue and Yu, Albert and Rhinehart, Nicholas and Levine, Sergey},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.10024},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@article{nasiriany2022learning,\n title={Learning and retrieval from prior data for skill-based imitation learning},\n author={Nasiriany, Soroush and Gao, Tian and Mandlekar, Ajay and Zhu, Yuke},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.11435},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{shin2020autoprompt,\n title={Autoprompt: Eliciting knowledge from language models with automatically generated prompts},\n author={Shin, Taylor and Razeghi, Yasaman and Iv, Robert L Logan and Wallace, Eric and Singh, Sameer},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 2020 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP)},\n pages={4222--4235},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhou2022large,\n title={Large language models are human-level prompt engineers},\n author={Zhou, Yongchao and Muresanu, Andrei Ioan and Han, Ziwen and Paster, Keiran and Pitis, Silviu and Chan, Harris and Ba, Jimmy},\n booktitle={The eleventh international conference on learning representations},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{pryzant2023automatic,\n title={Automatic prompt optimization with “gradient descent” and beam search},\n author={Pryzant, Reid and Iter, Dan and Li, Jerry and Lee, Yin and Zhu, Chenguang and Zeng, Michael},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 2023 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing},\n pages={7957--7968},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{liang2023code,\n title={Code as policies: Language model programs for embodied control},\n author={Liang, Jacky and Huang, Wenlong and Xia, Fei and Xu, Peng and Hausman, Karol and Ichter, Brian and Florence, Pete and Zeng, Andy},\n booktitle={2023 IEEE International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA)},\n pages={9493--9500},\n year={2023},\n organization={IEEE}\n}\n\n@article{huang2023voxposer,\n title={Voxposer: Composable 3d value maps for robotic manipulation with language models},\n author={Huang, Wenlong and Wang, Chen and Zhang, Ruohan and Li, Yunzhu and Wu, Jiajun and Fei-Fei, Li},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05973},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{zeng2022socratic,\n title={Socratic models: Composing zero-shot multimodal reasoning with language},\n author={Zeng, Andy and Attarian, Maria and Ichter, Brian and Choromanski, Krzysztof and Wong, Adrian and Welker, Stefan and Tombari, Federico and Purohit, Aveek and Ryoo, Michael and Sindhwani, Vikas and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.00598},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{pertsch2021accelerating,\n title={Accelerating reinforcement learning with learned skill priors},\n author={Pertsch, Karl and Lee, Youngwoon and Lim, Joseph},\n booktitle={Conference on robot learning},\n pages={188--204},\n year={2021},\n organization={PMLR}\n}\n\n@article{wilcoxson2024leveraging,\n title={Leveraging skills from unlabeled prior data for efficient online exploration},\n author={Wilcoxson, Max and Li, Qiyang and Frans, Kevin and Levine, Sergey},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.18076},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{ajay2020opal,\n title={Opal: Offline primitive discovery for accelerating offline reinforcement learning},\n author={Ajay, Anurag and Kumar, Aviral and Agrawal, Pulkit and Levine, Sergey and Nachum, Ofir},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.13611},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@article{sun2026prior,\n title={From Prior to Pro: Efficient Skill Mastery via Distribution Contractive RL Finetuning},\n author={Sun, Zhanyi and Song, Shuran},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.10263},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{xu2026rl,\n title={RL Token: Bootstrapping Online RL with Vision-Language-Action Models},\n author={Xu, Charles and Springenberg, Jost Tobias and Equi, Michael and Amin, Ali and Esmail, Adnan and Levine, Sergey and Ke, Liyiming},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.23073},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{chen2026steerable,\n title={Steerable Vision-Language-Action Policies for Embodied Reasoning and Hierarchical Control},\n author={Chen, William and Bhatia, Jagdeep Singh and Glossop, Catherine and Mathihalli, Nikhil and Doshi, Ria and Tang, Andy and Driess, Danny and Pertsch, Karl and Levine, Sergey},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.13193},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{shi2025hi,\n title={Hi robot: Open-ended instruction following with hierarchical vision-language-action models},\n author={Shi, Lucy Xiaoyang and Ichter, Brian and Equi, Michael and Ke, Liyiming and Pertsch, Karl and Vuong, Quan and Tanner, James and Walling, Anna and Wang, Haohuan and Fusai, Niccolo and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19417},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{shi2024yell,\n title={Yell at your robot: Improving on-the-fly from language corrections},\n author={Shi, Lucy Xiaoyang and Hu, Zheyuan and Zhao, Tony Z and Sharma, Archit and Pertsch, Karl and Luo, Jianlan and Levine, Sergey and Finn, Chelsea},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12910},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{li2025hamster,\n title={Hamster: Hierarchical action models for open-world robot manipulation},\n author={Li, Yi and Deng, Yuquan and Zhang, Jesse and Jang, Joel and Memmel, Marius and Garrett, Caelan and Ramos, Fabio and Fox, Dieter and Li, Anqi and Gupta, Abhishek and others},\n booktitle={International Conference on Learning Representations},\n volume={2025},\n pages={24040--24068},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{li2023interactive,\n title={Interactive task planning with language models},\n author={Li, Boyi and Wu, Philipp and Abbeel, Pieter and Malik, Jitendra},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10645},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{huang2022language,\n title={Language models as zero-shot planners: Extracting actionable knowledge for embodied agents},\n author={Huang, Wenlong and Abbeel, Pieter and Pathak, Deepak and Mordatch, Igor},\n booktitle={International conference on machine learning},\n pages={9118--9147},\n year={2022},\n organization={PMLR}\n}\n\n@article{huang2022inner,\n title={Inner monologue: Embodied reasoning through planning with language models},\n author={Huang, Wenlong and Xia, Fei and Xiao, Ted and Chan, Harris and Liang, Jacky and Florence, Pete and Zeng, Andy and Tompson, Jonathan and Mordatch, Igor and Chebotar, Yevgen and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.05608},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{driess2023palm,\n title={Palm-e: An embodied multimodal language model},\n author={Driess, Danny and Xia, Fei and Sajjadi, Mehdi SM and Lynch, Corey and Chowdhery, Aakanksha and Ichter, Brian and Wahid, Ayzaan and Tompson, Jonathan and Vuong, Quan and Yu, Tianhe and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.03378},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{zhang2023bootstrap,\n title={Bootstrap your own skills: Learning to solve new tasks with large language model guidance},\n author={Zhang, Jesse and Zhang, Jiahui and Pertsch, Karl and Liu, Ziyi and Ren, Xiang and Chang, Minsuk and Sun, Shao-Hua and Lim, Joseph J},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10021},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{ha2023scaling,\n title={Scaling up and distilling down: Language-guided robot skill acquisition},\n author={Ha, Huy and Florence, Pete and Song, Shuran},\n booktitle={Conference on Robot Learning},\n pages={3766--3777},\n year={2023},\n organization={PMLR}\n}\n\n@article{zhan2026stable,\n title={Stable Language Guidance for Vision-Language-Action Models},\n author={Zhan, Zhihao and Chen, Yuhao and Zhou, Jiaying and Lv, Qinhan and Liu, Hao and Wang, Keze and Lin, Liang and Wang, Guangrun},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.04052},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{kwok2026scaling,\n title={Scaling Verification Can Be More Effective than Scaling Policy Learning for Vision-Language-Action Alignment},\n author={Kwok, Jacky and Zhang, Xilun and Xu, Mengdi and Liu, Yuejiang and Mirhoseini, Azalia and Finn, Chelsea and Pavone, Marco},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12281},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{shah2025learning,\n title={Learning Affordances at Inference-Time for Vision-Language-Action Models},\n author={Shah, Ameesh and Chen, William and Godbole, Adwait and Mora, Federico and Seshia, Sanjit A and Levine, Sergey},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.19752},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{li2025map,\n title={Map-vla: Memory-augmented prompting for vision-language-action model in robotic manipulation},\n author={Li, Runhao and Guo, Wenkai and Wu, Zhenyu and Wang, Changyuan and Deng, Haoyuan and Weng, Zhenyu and Tan, Yap-Peng and Wang, Ziwei},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.09516},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{liu2023libero,\n title={Libero: Benchmarking knowledge transfer for lifelong robot learning},\n author={Liu, Bo and Zhu, Yifeng and Gao, Chongkai and Feng, Yihao and Liu, Qiang and Zhu, Yuke and Stone, Peter},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={36},\n pages={44776--44791},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{kwon2024stableprompt,\n title={StablePrompt: Automatic prompt tuning using reinforcement learning for large language model},\n author={Kwon, Minchan and Kim, Gaeun and Kim, Jongsuk and Lee, Haeil and Kim, Junmo},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing},\n pages={9868--9884},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{kong2024prewrite,\n title={Prewrite: Prompt rewriting with reinforcement learning},\n author={Kong, Weize and Hombaiah, Spurthi and Zhang, Mingyang and Mei, Qiaozhu and Bendersky, Michael},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers)},\n pages={594--601},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{lu2022dynamic,\n title={Dynamic prompt learning via policy gradient for semi-structured mathematical reasoning},\n author={Lu, Pan and Qiu, Liang and Chang, Kai-Wei and Wu, Ying Nian and Zhu, Song-Chun and Rajpurohit, Tanmay and Clark, Peter and Kalyan, Ashwin},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14610},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{batorski2025prl,\n title={Prl: Prompts from reinforcement learning},\n author={Batorski, Pawe{\\l} and Kosmala, Adrian and Swoboda, Paul},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14412},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{guo2023evoprompt,\n title={Evoprompt: Connecting llms with evolutionary algorithms yields powerful prompt optimizers},\n author={Guo, Qingyan and Wang, Rui and Guo, Junliang and Li, Bei and Song, Kaitao and Tan, Xu and Liu, Guoqing and Bian, Jiang and Yang, Yujiu},\n journal={arXiv e-prints},\n pages={arXiv--2309},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{jafari2024morl,\n title={MORL-prompt: An empirical analysis of multi-objective reinforcement learning for discrete prompt optimization},\n author={Jafari, Yasaman and Mekala, Dheeraj and Yu, Rose and Berg-Kirkpatrick, Taylor},\n booktitle={Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024},\n pages={9878--9889},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{wang2024promptagent,\n title={Promptagent: Strategic planning with language models enables expert-level prompt optimization},\n author={Wang, Xinyuan and Li, Chenxi and Wang, Zhen and Bai, Fan and Luo, Haotian and Zhang, Jiayou and Jojic, Nebojsa and Xing, Eric and Hu, Zhiting},\n booktitle={International Conference on Learning Representations},\n volume={2024},\n pages={23967--24001},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{jung2024discrete,\n title={Discrete prompt compression with reinforcement learning},\n author={Jung, Hoyoun and Kim, Kyung-Joong},\n journal={IEEE Access},\n volume={12},\n pages={72578--72587},\n year={2024},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n\n@article{zhang2022tempera,\n title={Tempera: Test-time prompting via reinforcement learning},\n author={Zhang, Tianjun and Wang, Xuezhi and Zhou, Denny and Schuurmans, Dale and Gonzalez, Joseph E},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.11890},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{deng2022rlprompt,\n title={Rlprompt: Optimizing discrete text prompts with reinforcement learning},\n author={Deng, Mingkai and Wang, Jianyu and Hsieh, Cheng-Ping and Wang, Yihan and Guo, Han and Shu, Tianmin and Song, Meng and Xing, Eric and Hu, Zhiting},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing},\n pages={3369--3391},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{jain2025polaris,\n title={Polaris: Scalable real-to-sim evaluations for generalist robot policies},\n author={Jain, Arhan and Zhang, Mingtong and Arora, Kanav and Chen, William and Torne, Marcel and Irshad, Muhammad Zubair and Zakharov, Sergey and Wang, Yue and Levine, Sergey and Finn, Chelsea and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16881},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{haarnoja2018soft,\n title={Soft actor-critic algorithms and applications},\n author={Haarnoja, Tuomas and Zhou, Aurick and Hartikainen, Kristian and Tucker, George and Ha, Sehoon and Tan, Jie and Kumar, Vikash and Zhu, Henry and Gupta, Abhishek and Abbeel, Pieter and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.05905},\n year={2018}\n}\n\n@article{khazatsky2024droid,\n title={Droid: A large-scale in-the-wild robot manipulation dataset},\n author={Khazatsky, Alexander and Pertsch, Karl and Nair, Suraj and Balakrishna, Ashwin and Dasari, Sudeep and Karamcheti, Siddharth and Nasiriany, Soroush and Srirama, Mohan Kumar and Chen, Lawrence Yunliang and Ellis, Kirsty and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12945},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{o2024open,\n title={Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models: Open x-embodiment collaboration 0},\n author={O’Neill, Abby and Rehman, Abdul and Maddukuri, Abhiram and Gupta, Abhishek and Padalkar, Abhishek and Lee, Abraham and Pooley, Acorn and Gupta, Agrim and Mandlekar, Ajay and Jain, Ajinkya and others},\n booktitle={2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)},\n pages={6892--6903},\n year={2024},\n organization={IEEE}\n}\n\n@article{barto2021reinforcement,\n title={Reinforcement learning: An introduction. by richard’s sutton},\n author={Barto, Andrew G},\n journal={SIAM Rev},\n volume={6},\n number={2},\n pages={423},\n year={2021},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@article{team2023gemini,\n title={Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models},\n author={Team, Gemini and Anil, Rohan and Borgeaud, Sebastian and Alayrac, Jean-Baptiste and Yu, Jiahui and Soricut, Radu and Schalkwyk, Johan and Dai, Andrew M and Hauth, Anja and Millican, Katie and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass{article}\n\n\\usepackage[preprint]{corl_2026} % Use this for the initial submission.\n% \\usepackage[final]{corl_2026} % Uncomment for the camera-ready ``final'' version.\n% \\usepackage[preprint]{corl_2026} % Uncomment for pre-prints (e.g., arxiv); This is like ``final'', but will remove the CORL footnote.\n\\usepackage{xspace}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm}\n\\usepackage{bm}\n\\usepackage{cleveref}\n\\usepackage{color}\n\\usepackage{cleveref}\n\\usepackage{algorithm}\n\\usepackage{algpseudocode}\n\\usepackage{wrapfig}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{subcaption}\n\\usepackage{tabularx}\n\\usepackage{enumitem}\n\\usepackage{upgreek}\n\n\\DeclareMathOperator*{\\argmax}{arg\\,max}\n\n% Feel free to make one for yourself!!\n\\newcommand{\\jbcomment}[1]{\\textcolor{olive}{[JB: #1]}}\n\\newcommand{\\awcomment}[1]{\\textcolor{blue}{[AW: #1]}}\n\\newcommand{\\slcomment}[1]{\\textcolor{violet}{[SL: #1]}}\n\\newcommand{\\wccomment}[1]{\\textcolor{brown}{[WC: #1]}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\method}{{SARL}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\methodspelledout}{{Semantic Action Reinforcement Learning}\\xspace}\n% \\newcommand{\\method}{{\\color{red} SARL}\\xspace}\n% \\newcommand{\\methodspelledout}{{\\color{red} Semantic Action Reinforcement Learning}\\xspace}\n\n\\newcommand{\\loose}{\\looseness=-1}\n\n\\title{Adapting Generalist Robot Policies with\\\\Semantic Reinforcement Learning}\n\n% The \\author macro works with any number of authors. There are two\n% commands used to separate the names and addresses of multiple\n% authors: \\And and \\AND.\n%\n% Using \\And between authors leaves it to LaTeX to determine where to\n% break the lines. Using \\AND forces a line break at that point. So,\n% if LaTeX puts 3 of 4 authors names on the first line, and the last\n% on the second line, try using \\AND instead of \\And before the third\n% author name.\n\n% NOTE: authors will be visible only in the camera-ready and preprint versions (i.e., when using the option 'final' or 'preprint'). \n% \tFor the initial submission the authors will be anonymized.\n\n% \\author{\n% Jagdeep Singh Bhatia\\\\\n% U.C. Berkeley\\\\\n% \\texttt{jagdeep@berkeley.edu} \\\\\n% \\And\n% Andrew Wagenmaker\\\\\n% U.C. Berkeley\\\\\n% \\texttt{ajwagen@berkeley.edu} \\\\\n% \\And\n% William Chen\\\\\n% U.C. Berkeley\\\\\n% \\texttt{verityw@berkeley.edu} \\\\\n% \\And\n% Sergey Levine\\\\\n% U.C. Berkeley\\\\\n% \\texttt{svlevine@eecs.berkeley.edu} \\\\\n% }\n\\author{\n Jagdeep Singh Bhatia, Andrew Wagenmaker, William Chen, Sergey Levine\\\\\n U.C. Berkeley\\\\\n % \\texttt{jagdeep@berkeley.edu} \\\\\n \\href{https://semantic-action-rl.github.io}{\\color{orange}\\texttt{semantic-action-rl.github.io}}\n}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\\newgeometry{margin=1.25in} % Sets 1-inch margins on all sides\n\\maketitle\n\n%===============================================================================\n\n\\begin{abstract}\nGeneralist robot policies learn a diverse repertoire of behaviors from large-scale pretraining. In principle, this makes them excellent priors for downstream adaptation via reinforcement learning (RL). In practice, however, standard RL methods leveraging this prior optimize directly over robot actions, requiring the base policy's action distribution to be close to that of a performant policy from the start. This assumption breaks down for complex or long-horizon tasks that fall outside the pretraining distribution.\nOur key insight is that, for sufficiently expressive generalist policies, language prompts are an effective alternative space for learning to solve such tasks: modulating language inputs elicits skills already within the policy's repertoire, which can be composed to solve tasks beyond its zero-shot capabilities. We propose \\methodspelledout (\\method), which learns to optimize this prompt space through online interaction, treating the generalist policy as a controllable skill prior. \nImportantly, leveraging pretrained skills rather than learning new ones from scratch yields structured, semantically meaningful exploration and highly efficient online improvement, and learning to modulate prompts through experience grounds them in induced real-world behaviors for robust task-solving.\nAcross real-world settings and simulated benchmarks, we show \\method unlocks fundamentally new capabilities---adapting VLA behavior to solve complex, long-horizon tasks---and significantly outperforms existing approaches for improving robot behavior in deployment.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n% Two or three meaningful keywords should be added here\n\\keywords{Language Steering, Real-world RL, Robot Foundation Model} \n\n\\input{intro}\n\\input{related-work}\n\\input{method}\n\\input{experiments}\n\n\\input{conclusion}\n\n% no \\bibliographystyle is required, since the corl style is automatically used.\n\\bibliography{main} % .bib\n\n\\appendix\n\\input{appendix}\n% \\clearpage\n% \\bibliography{example} % .bib\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: method.tex\n================================================\n\n\n\\newcommand{\\cO}{\\mathcal{O}}\n\\newcommand{\\cL}{\\mathcal{L}}\n\\newcommand{\\cM}{\\mathcal{M}}\n\\newcommand{\\cS}{\\mathcal{S}}\n\\newcommand{\\cA}{\\mathcal{A}}\n\\newcommand{\\cArob}{\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathrm{robot}}}\n\\newcommand{\\cAlang}{\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathrm{sem}}}\n\\newcommand{\\lang}{\\ell}\n\\newcommand{\\pivla}{\\pi_{\\mathrm{vla}}}\n\\newcommand{\\pisemt}{\\pi^t_{\\mathrm{sem}}}\n\\newcommand{\\pilang}{\\pi_{\\lang}}\n\\newcommand{\\obs}{o}\n\\newcommand{\\act}{a}\n\\newcommand{\\avla}{a_{\\mathrm{vla}}}\n\\newcommand{\\bell}{\\bm{\\ell}}\n\\newcommand{\\task}{\\tau}\n\\newcommand{\\tvlm}{t_{\\mathrm{vlm}}}\n\\newcommand{\\frakB}{\\mathfrak{B}}\n\\newcommand{\\Qbar}{\\bar{Q}}\n\\newcommand{\\traj}{\\uptau}\n\\newcommand{\\frakD}{\\mathfrak{D}}\n\\newcommand{\\Psemantic}{P_{\\mathrm{sem}}}\n\\newcommand{\\cMsemantic}{\\cM_{\\mathrm{sem}}}\n\\newcommand{\\Qsem}{Q_{\\mathrm{sem}}}\n\\newcommand{\\Qbarsem}{\\bar{Q}_{\\mathrm{sem}}}\n\n\n\\section{Preliminaries}\\label{sec:prelim}\n\\vspace{-0.5em}\n\\textbf{Markov decision processes.} We consider decision-making in Markov decision processes (MDPs), defined by a tuple $\\cM = (\\cS, \\cA, P, P_0, \\gamma, r)$, where $\\cS$ is the set of states, $\\cA$ the set of actions, $P : \\cS \\times \\cA \\rightarrow \\triangle_{\\cS}$ the transition function, $P_0 \\in \\triangle_{\\cS}$ the initial state distribution, $\\gamma \\in [0,1]$ the discount factor, and $r : \\cS \\rightarrow \\mathbb{R}$ the reward function. An episode consists of a sequence of interactions between an agent and the environment. Each episode starts at initial state $s_0 \\sim P_0$, the agent selects action $a_0$, receives reward $r(s_0)$, and transitions to state $s_1 \\sim P(s_0, a_0)$, repeating this process until a terminal state is reached. A policy $\\pi : \\cS \\rightarrow \\triangle_{\\cA}$ is a mapping from states to actions. \nThe goal of RL is to learn a policy that maximizes the expected discounted reward, $V(\\pi) := \\mathbb{E}^\\pi[\\sum_{t} \\gamma^t r(s_t)]$, where the expectation is over trajectories from rolling out $\\pi$ in $\\cM$. \nWe define the $Q$-function as $Q^\\pi(s, a) := \\mathbb{E}^\\pi [ \\sum_{t} \\gamma^t r(s_t) \\,\\Big|\\, s_0 = s, a_0 = a]$, the expected discounted reward of taking action $a$ from state $s$ and then following policy $\\pi$.\n\nWhile usually taken as given, the parameterization of the action space $\\cA$ is often itself a key design decision in RL. In robotic control, $\\cA$ is most commonly the set of continuous robot actions (e.g., joint positions, motor torques, or end-effector deltas), which we generically denote as $\\cArob$. However, as we will discuss in the following, correctly choosing $\\cA$ can often enable much more efficient RL.\n\n\\textbf{Vision-language-action models (VLAs).}\nDiverse large-scale robotic datasets $\\frakD = \\{ (\\traj_t, \\ell_t) \\}_t$ often contain human-teleoperated trajectories, $\\traj_t = (s_0^t, a_0^t, s_1^t, a_1^t, \\ldots, )$ for $s_h^t \\in \\cS$ and $a_h^t \\in \\cArob$, paired with corresponding language commands, $\\ell_t$. Behavioral cloning then trains a language-conditioned policy to produce action $a^t_h$ given state $s^t_h$ and language $\\ell_t$ by ``copying'' the expert behaviors in the dataset $\\frakD$. In principle, the resulting policies, given some task of interest described by a language command $\\ell$, are able to produce actions $a_h \\sim \\pivla(\\cdot \\mid s_h, \\ell)$ that lead the robot to complete the task. Such ``generalist'' policies, including ``vision-language-action'' models (VLAs), have shown significant promise in capturing language-controllable priors on effective robot behaviors, enabling general-purpose robotic task-solving abilities~\\citep{lbm, black2024pi0, kim2024openvla, intelligence2025pi_}. \n\n\\section{Leveraging VLAs as Semantic Action Priors for Efficient RL}\nIn this section, we outline our approach, \\method, which leverages VLAs as controllable action priors that can be steered to enable effective online learning of complex tasks. In particular, we assume access to a VLA $\\pivla$ and are interested in solving some task $\\tau$ corresponding to a reward function $r$. As illustrated in Figure~\\ref{fig:teaser}, \\method treats the language prompt of a VLA as a ``semantic action'', and, through real-world interaction, learns to adaptively control this semantic action to steer the VLA to reliably complete tasks of interest. \n\n\\subsection{VLAs as Semantically Controllable Action Priors}\\label{sec:vla_prior}\n\n\\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{0.4\\textwidth}\n \\vspace{-1.5em}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\linewidth]{figsv2/method-comparison_cropped.pdf}\n \\caption{Adapting VLAs to solve new tasks requires \\emph{decomposing} task-goals into achievable stages, and \\emph{grounding} each stage in behaviors that can be executed successfully in the environment. VLAs prompted zero-shot struggle with both decomposition and grounding, and prompting VLAs with VLMs achieves decomposition but not grounding. Only \\method achieves both by learning to optimize a VLA's prompt inputs with RL.} \n \\label{fig:grounding-and-decomposition}\n \\vspace{-1.0em}\n\\end{wrapfigure}\n\nIn a typical VLA deployment, the user provides a fixed language command $\\lang$ describing the task of interest $\\task$, and then uses a VLA to execute this command. For each observation $s$, the VLA generates action $\\act \\sim \\pivla(\\cdot \\mid s, \\lang)$, which is executed on the robot. While effective in settings where the observation and language command are supported by the VLA's training data $\\frakD$, this approach often fails to enable VLAs to solve new tasks not covered in the task repertoire spanned by $\\frakD$.\\loose\n\nIn this work, we take an alternative view on VLA deployment. While a VLA may fail to execute a complex or out-of-distribution (OOD) command zero-shot, it can often produce reliable behaviors if prompted with simple, physically grounded instructions \\cite{chen2026steerable}. For instance, as illustrated in Figure~\\ref{fig:grounding-and-decomposition}, the VLA fails to execute ``put the hammer on the plate and pick up the mushroom\" because the command is too complex and because the hammer (likely an OOD object) is often confused for other objects. By contrast, ``move down and grasp\" is simple and avoids referring to the hammer by name, successfully steering the robot. While prompting the VLA with the former instruction will fail to result in successful task completion, adaptively controlling the VLA by selecting a sequence of low-level, grounded instructions \\emph{can} steer the robot to solve the overall task $\\tau$. In other words, rather than viewing VLAs simply as policies to be statically prompted, we view them as \\emph{semantically controllable action priors} that can be dynamically guided throughout deployment to accomplish complex tasks of interest.\\loose\n\n\\textbf{Semantic MDPs.} \nThis motivates a natural transformation of our original decision-making setting: rather than learning over the robot action space $\\cArob$ as is typical in RL for robotics, we can learn in a \\emph{semantic} action space---the space of language commands, which we denote as $\\cAlang$---and deploy the VLA as a transformation between the two. Formally, rather than directly specifying action $a \\in \\cArob$, we can specify a ``semantic action'' $\\ell \\in \\cAlang$, generate robot action $\\avla \\sim \\pivla(\\cdot \\mid s, \\ell)$ with our VLA, and transition to $s' \\sim P(\\cdot \\mid s, \\avla)$. We denote this induced transition function as $\\Psemantic : \\cS \\times \\cAlang \\rightarrow \\triangle_{\\cS}$, and the corresponding induced ``semantic MDP'' as $\\cMsemantic := (\\cS, \\cAlang, \\Psemantic, P_0, \\gamma, r)$.\n\nBy considering decision-making in $\\cMsemantic$ instead of $\\cM$, we shift the burden from directly specifying precise robot actions to guiding the robot with semantic language commands, leveraging the VLA's priors to translate between semantic commands and robot actions. As described above, by correctly modulating these semantic actions, we can potentially steer the VLA to solve tasks that initially may appear outside its capabilities. Critically, learning over this semantic space enables efficient \\emph{semantic exploration}---instead of exploring the entirety of $\\cArob$, we can focus our exploration only on the ``semantically meaningful'' behaviors encoded in the VLA's priors and accessed via language prompting. As we will see, this enables highly efficient exploration and online improvement.\n\n\\subsection{\\method: Learning in Semantic Action Spaces}\n\\label{subsec:SARL-algo}\nOur proposed approach, \\method, aims to learn how to correctly select these ``semantic actions'' in order to steer VLAs to task success. While a VLA may act as an effective prior over robot actions, in general we do not know which language commands will effectively steer it to solve tasks of interest, and we must learn this through interaction with both the VLA and the environment. While in principle this can be achieved by applying any RL algorithm to learn in the semantic MDP $\\cMsemantic$, we propose a particular instantiation that seeks to enable efficient real-world learning.\\loose\n\n\\textbf{\\methodspelledout (\\method).}\nAt a high level, \\method operates by selecting a semantic action $\\ell_t \\in \\cAlang$ at each step $t$ and state $s_t$, taking semantic action $\\ell_t$ in $\\cMsemantic$ (or, equivalently, generating action $a_t \\sim \\pivla(\\cdot \\mid s_t, \\ell_t)$ and taking action $a_t$ in $\\cM$), and observing reward $r_t$ and next state $s_{t+1}$. In order to determine which semantic action to take at each step, \\method learns a \\emph{semantic $Q$-function}, $\\Qsem$, trained to estimate the effectiveness of semantic actions at making progress towards completing $\\tau$ from each state $s$ through\ntemporal-difference (TD) backups~\\cite{barto2021reinforcement}. When acting from state $s_t$, \\method samples a semantic action from the softmax distribution induced by their $Q$-values, $\\ell_t \\sim \\pisemt(\\cdot \\mid s)$ for $\\pisemt(\\ell \\mid s) \\propto \\exp(\\Qsem^t(s_t,\\ell))$. A formal description of our approach can be found in Algorithm~\\ref{alg:main}.\n\n\n\\newcommand{\\Vbarsem}{\\bar{V}_{\\mathrm{sem}}}\n\n\\begin{figure}[H]\n\\vspace{-0.5em}\n \\centering\n \\begin{minipage}{\\linewidth}\n \\begin{algorithm}[H]\n \\caption{\\methodspelledout (\\method)}\n \\begin{algorithmic}[1]\n \\State \\textbf{input}: semantic environment $\\cMsemantic$, semantic action space $\\cAlang$\n \\State Initialize $\\Qsem^1$ randomly, replay buffer $\\frakB \\leftarrow \\emptyset$\n \\For{$t = 1, 2, 3, \\ldots $}\n \\State Set $\\pisemt(\\ell \\mid s) \\propto \\exp(\\Qsem^t(s,\\ell))$\n \\State Sample $\\ell_t \\sim \\pisemt(\\cdot \\mid s_t)$\n \\Statex \\hspace{1em} {\\color{blue} \\texttt{// Equivalently, execute action $a_t \\sim \\pivla(\\cdot \\mid s_t, \\ell_t)$ in $\\cM$}}\n \\State Execute semantic action $\\ell_t$ in $\\cMsemantic$, observe reward $r_t$ and next state $s_{t+1}$ \n \\State $\\frakB \\leftarrow \\frakB \\cup \\{ (s_t, \\ell_t, r_t, s_{t+1}) \\}$\n \\State Set $\\Vbarsem^t(s') \\leftarrow \\mathbb{E}_{\\ell' \\sim \\pisemt(\\cdot \\mid s')} \\big[ \\Qbar_{\\mathrm{sem}}^t(s', \\ell') \\big]$ and\n \\begin{align*}\n \\textstyle\n \\Qsem^{t+1} \\leftarrow \\min_Q \\sum_{(s,\\ell,r,s') \\in \\frakB} (Q(s,\\ell) - r - \\Vbarsem^t(s'))^2 \n \\end{align*}\n \\EndFor\n \\end{algorithmic}\n \\label{alg:main}\n\\end{algorithm}\n\\vspace{-2em}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\textbf{Compressing $\\cAlang$ with VLMs.}\nNa\\\"{\\i}vely learning over the space of all possible VLA prompts ($\\cAlang$) is intractable. To mitigate this, \\method refines $\\cAlang$ and reduces the search space by relying on large pretrained models, which can encode powerful semantic priors. In particular, vision-language models (VLMs) have proven effective at proposing semantic commands relevant for robotic control \\cite{ahn2022can, chen2026steerable, shah2025learning}. Instead of searching over all possible prompts, \\method provides a VLM with the current image observation $s_t$ and high-level task $\\tau$, and prompts it to generate a set of \\textit{candidate} semantic actions, $\\cAlang^t$. $\\cAlang^t$ is then used instead of $\\cAlang$ in Algorithm~\\ref{alg:main}, enabling \\method to consider only a small set of candidate actions at each step. \n\nNote that, while VLMs can often generate reasonable candidate VLA prompts, they fundamentally lack grounding for which commands are actually effective. A potential command might appear reasonable to a VLM, yet the VLA's exact response to this command is highly dependent on the deployment setting, the VLA's training data, and other factors the VLM does not have access to. In other words, VLMs alone are not effective at directly controlling VLAs (as shown in \\Cref{sec:experiments}). By interleaving VLM queries with real-world interaction, \\method is able to achieve the best-of-both worlds---effectively leveraging the VLM's semantic priors, while also enabling improvement over these priors by grounding semantic actions in physical VLA behaviors from experience.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: prompts/real-gemini-cache.tex\n================================================\nYou are guiding a robot to complete the task '[self.task\\_instruction]' in its environment by chosing a list of candidate task instructions for the robot to follow given an image of the robot's current observation. There are several kinds of instructions the robot understands, each at a different level of abstraction, detailed below. It is not known apriori which level of abstraction will induce the desired behavior in the robot's low-level language conditioned policy, so your job is to generate candidates that will be processed by a downstream algorithm.\n\nBelow are examples of the kinds of instructions you can generate for the robot.\n \nSome examples of High-level instructions are:\n\n- 'grasp the mushroom in the pot'\n\n- 'wipe the cloth across the table'\n\n- 'move the lid above the pot'\n\n- 'lift the carrot up' \\# Lifting is generallly good post-grasping\n\n- 'move towards the stuffed toy'\n\n- 'move the eggplant to the bowl'\n \nThe robot is generally reliable at following high-level commands, especially when interacting with non-novel objects. They can also be used to better understand the scene and robot state, such as by saying 'lift the object' to ascertain if the robot has actually firmly grasped it. However, these commands may fail when interacting with novel objects, as the robot may not recognize them by name. The robot also may also confuse similar objects with each other (e.g., it may mix up a bowl and pot, or multiple instances of the same kind of object).\n\nSome examples of Atomic Motion instructions are:\n\n- 'move left'\n\n- 'move above the bowl'\n\n- 'move down and close'\n\n- 'open the gripper'\n\n- 'move the cloth left'\n\n- 'pull the drawer handle backward'\n\nMotion commands are good for general positioning, such as moving to a pre-grasp pose above the object the robot must interact with. They can also be used for positional corrections, e.g., 'move up and right above the bowl' if the gripper is too low. These commands are also appropriate when the task involves spatial reasoning (e.g., tasks that reference left or right). However, these commands are often underspecified, so the robot may reach for the wrong object if simply told 'move to the right and grasp.' Note that to go to the back of the table, tell the robot to go 'forwards' (it is forwards from the robot's perspective).\n\nFinally, some examples of Combination instructions are:\n\n- 'move down to the mushroom and grasp it'\n\n- 'grab the mushroom and move it to the plate on the left'\n\n- 'open the gripper and move right'\n\n\nCombination commands are useful for supplementing the weaknesses of other command types, such as saying 'move right to grasp the carrot' rather than just 'move right and grasp' (if there are multiple objects to the right of the robot) or 'grasp the carrot on the right' (if there are multiple carrots in the scene). However, being too specific may result in out-of-distribution commands, which the robot policy fails to follow. Additionally, less specific commands can be useful for positioning the robot in a location where it's more likely to succeed.\n\nYou MUST follow these steps when generating your response: \n\n- Step 1: Briefly (1-2 sentences) describe the scene in the current observation, such as enumerating which objects are present and the robot grippers current state. If the robot's gripper is close to an object, think carefully about whether the object has already been grasped, lifted or neither. Think about whether the gripper is currently open or closed.\n\n- Step 2: Briefly (1-2 sentences) enumerate the robot's full sequence of objectives required to complete the task. IMPORTANT: ONCE A SUBGOAL HAS BEEN COMPLETED, DO NOT KEEP INTERACTING WITH THE OBJECT FOR THAT SUBGOAL. THE DEFINITION OF TASK SUCCESS IS QUITE LOOSE (eg. if the goal is to put an eggplant on the towel, ANY part of the eggplant being on the towel will be considered a success. DO NOT keep interacting with the eggplant).\n\n- Step 3: Briefly (1 sentences) turn the robot's immediate next objective into a subtask statement. A relatively longer-horizon subtask statement is preferred in this step. Eg. \"pick up the egg and move it to the bowl\" rather than \"grasp the egg\" or \"move down\" or \"close the gripper\". The subtask objective should make sense to execute immediately given the current state.\n\n- Step 4: Briefly (1-2 sentences) think about 1) the overall direction the robot should move in (left, right, back of table [\"forwards\"], toward the camera [\"backwards\"], up, down) and 2) obvious verbs that could be used to instruct the robot (use verbs likely present in robot datasets, without being too extravagant and be sure to PRIORITIZE verbs found in the original task description), whether the robot should open/close the gripper. \n\n- Step 5: (1-2 sentences) think about how to avoid these common failure modes: confusing objects with the same name, interacting with the object directly in front of the robot rather than the intended object, and executing parts of the command out of order (eg. dropping object prematurely when the command involves both \"moving\" and \"releasing\").\n\n- Step 6: Output the FINAL MASTER LIST of commands for the robot to choose between. The master list should follow this guidance:\n\n- Output exactly eight commands. Commands MUST BE EXACTLY THE SAME AS THOSE ON THE LIST PROVIDED BELOW. DO NOT OUTPUT ANY OTHER COMMANDS. The list may not be perfect, choose the best fit.\n\n- Output commands most likley to help the robot succeed, while still being diverse.\n\n- Always output EXACTLY TWO SIMPLE atomic motion commands ouptut more combination commands than any other abstraction type. YOU MUST ALWAYS INCLUDE EITHER \"move right\" or \"move left\" in the list.\n\n- Commands should be diverse in horizon: shorter horizon (eg. \"move above the egg\") and longer-horizon behaviors (\"move the egg to the pot\"), but should not exceed the length of the next subtask.\n\n- Use an indicator (left, right, blue) to distinguish objects of the same name ONLY if the robot is near the wrong copy of that object. DO NOT use the indicator if the robot is currently interacting with the correct copy.\n\nThe master list should be numbered (1. 2. 3. ...) but use only the text of the command exactly as presented. DO NOT organize the master list by objective, simply list all the commands together in one numbered list. After the master list, DO NOT OUTPUT ANY OTHER TEXT.\n\nCurrent Observation: [current\\_observation]\n\nYou must choose commands EXACTLY from this list: [cached\\_commands\\_str]\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: prompts/real-gemini-open-ended.tex\n================================================\nYou are guiding a robot to complete the task '[self.task\\_instruction]' in its environment by generating candidate subtask instructions for the robot to follow given an image of the robot's current observation. There are several kinds of instructions the robot understands, each at a different level of abstraction, detailed below. It is not known apriori which level of abstraction will induce the desired behavior in the robot's low-level language conditioned policy, so your job is to generate candidates that will be processed by a downstream algorithm.\n\nBelow are examples of the kinds of instructions you can generate for the robot.\n \nSome examples of High-level instructions are:\n\n- 'grasp the mushroom in the pot'\n\n- 'wipe the cloth across the table'\n\n- 'move the lid above the pot'\n\n- 'lift the carrot up' \\# Lifting is generallly good post-grasping\n\n- 'move towards the stuffed toy'\n\n- 'move the eggplant to the bowl'\n \nThe robot is generally reliable at following high-level commands, especially when interacting with non-novel objects. They can also be used to better understand the scene and robot state, such as by saying 'lift the object' to ascertain if the robot has actually firmly grasped it. However, these commands may fail when interacting with novel objects, as the robot may not recognize them by name. The robot also may also confuse similar objects with each other (e.g., it may mix up a bowl and pot, or multiple instances of the same kind of object).\n\nSome examples of Atomic Motion instructions are:\n\n- 'move left'\n\n- 'move above the bowl'\n\n- 'move down and close'\n\n- 'open the gripper'\n\n- 'move the cloth left'\n\n- 'pull the drawer handle backward'\n\nMotion commands are good for general positioning, such as moving to a pre-grasp pose above the object the robot must interact with. They can also be used for positional corrections, e.g., 'move up and right above the bowl' if the gripper is too low. These commands are also appropriate when the task involves spatial reasoning (e.g., tasks that reference left or right). However, these commands are often underspecified, so the robot may reach for the wrong object if simply told 'move to the right and grasp.' Note that to go to the back of the table, tell the robot to go 'forwards' (it is forwards from the robot's perspective).\n\nFinally, some examples of Combination instructions are:\n\n- 'move down to the mushroom and grasp it'\n\n- 'grab the mushroom and move it to the plate on the left'\n\n- 'open the gripper and move right'\n\nCombination commands are useful for supplementing the weaknesses of other command types, such as saying 'move right to grasp the carrot' rather than just 'move right and grasp' (if there are multiple objects to the right of the robot) or 'grasp the carrot on the right' (if there are multiple carrots in the scene). However, being too specific may result in out-of-distribution commands, which the robot policy fails to follow. Additionally, less specific commands can be useful for positioning the robot in a location where it's more likely to succeed.\n\nYou MUST follow these steps when generating your response: \n\n- Step 1: Briefly (1-2 sentences) describe the scene in the current observation, such as enumerating which objects are present and the robot grippers current state. If the robot's gripper is close to an object, think carefully about whether the object has already been grasped, lifted or neither. Think about whether the gripper is currently open or closed.\n\n- Step 2: Briefly (1-2 sentences) enumerate the robot's full sequence of objectives required to complete the task.\n\n- Step 3: Briefly (1 sentences) turn the robot's immediate next objective into a subtask statement. A relatively longer-horizon subtask statement is preferred in this step. Eg. \"pick up the egg and move it to the bowl\" rather than \"grasp the egg\" or \"move down\" or \"close the gripper\". The subtask objective should make sense to execute immediately given the current state.\n\n- Step 4: Briefly (1-2 sentences) think about 1) the overall direction the robot should move in (left, right, back of table [\"forwards\"], toward the camera [\"backwards\"], up, down) and 2) obvious verbs that could be used to instruct the robot (use verbs likely present in robot datasets, without being too extravagant and be sure to PRIORITIZE verbs found in the original task description), whether the robot should open/close the gripper. \n\n- Step 5: (1-2 sentences) think about how to avoid these common failure modes: confusing objects with the same name, interacting with the object directly in front of the robot rather than the intended object, and executing parts of the command out of order (eg. dropping object prematurely when the command involves both \"moving\" and \"releasing\").\n\n- Step 6: Output the FINAL MASTER LIST of commands for the robot to choose between. The master list should follow this guidance:\n\n- Output commands most likley to help the robot succeed, while still being diverse.\n\n- Output exactly eight commands. Always output EXACTLY TWO SIMPLE atomic motion commands ouptut more combination commands than any other abstraction type.\n\n- Commands should be diverse in horizon: shorter horizon (eg. \"move above the egg\") and longer-horizon behaviors (\"move the egg to the pot\"), but should not exceed the length of the next subtask.\n\n- Use an indicator (left, right, blue) to distinguish objects of the same name ONLY if the robot is near the wrong copy of that object. DO NOT use the indicator if the robot is currently interacting with the correct copy.\n\n- All commands will be executed immediately, so do not output forward-looking commands that do not make sense to run at the robot's current state (eg. \"open the gripper\" does not make sense if the robot is not yet at the correct position to release the object. However, \"move the egg to the plate\" does make sense if consistent with the task).\n\nThe master list should be numbered. DO NOT organize the master list by objective, simply list all the commands together in one numbered list. After the master list, DO NOT OUTPUT ANY OTHER TEXT.\n\nCurrent Obervation: [current\\_observation]\n\n================================================\nFILE: prompts/real-gemini-sp-baseline.tex\n================================================\nYou are guiding a robot to complete a task by generating a subtask instruction for the robot to follow given an image of the robot's current observation, and a history of observations and past commands. The robot is trying to accomplish the overall task: '[self.task\\_description]'. You should keep the rest of the environment unchanged. Note that all objects required for the task are present (no need to search for objects). There are several kinds of instructions the robot understands, each at a different level of abstraction, detailed below. Sometimes, a high-level instruction is sufficient for the robot to make progress towards solving the task, but other times, a more specific command is required.\n\nBelow are examples of the kinds of instructions you can generate for the robot.\n \nSome examples of High-level instructions are:\n\n- 'grasp the mushroom in the pot'\n\n- 'wipe the cloth across the table'\n\n- 'move the lid above the pot'\n\n- 'lift the carrot up'\n\n- 'move towards the stuffed toy'\n\n- 'drop the eggplant in the bowl'\n \nThe robot is generally reliable at following high-level commands, especially when interacting with non-novel objects. They can also be used to better understand the scene and robot state, such as by saying 'lift the object' to ascertain if the robot has actually firmly grasped it. However, these commands may fail when interacting with novel objects, as the robot may not recognize them by name. The robot also may also confuse similar objects with each other (e.g., it may mix up a bowl and pot, or multiple instances of the same kind of object).\n\nSome examples of Atomic Motion instructions are:\n\n- 'move left'\n\n- 'move right and down'\n\n- 'move down and close'\n\n- 'open the gripper'\n\n- 'move the cloth left'\n\n- 'pull the drawer handle backward'\n\nMotion commands are good for general positioning, such as moving to a pre-grasp pose above the object the robot must interact with. They can also be used for more minor corrections, e.g., 'move up and right above the bowl' if the gripper is too low. These commands are also appropriate when the task involves spatial reasoning (e.g., tasks that reference left or right) or moving in unconventional ways (e.g., lifting the arm to grasp something on a high shelf). However, these commands are often underspecified, so the robot may reach for the wrong object if simply told 'move to the right and grasp.'\n\nSome examples of Position-based instructions are:\n\n- 'pick up the object at <mushroom>'\n\n- 'go to <pot>'\n\n- 'grasp at <blue cube>'\n\n- 'move above <plate>'\n\n- 'open gripper at <bowl>'\n\n- 'move towards <towel>'\n\nNote, you simply need to specify the object name within angle brackets, e.g., <mushroom>, and a object detector system will fill in the pixel coordinates for you. If there are multiple instances of the object, provide a unique, specific identifier within the brackets to indicate which instance you are referring to, e.g., <mushroom on the left>.\n\nPosition-based commands are especially helpful for specifying novel objects that the robot fails to recognize by name. They can also be used to clearly specify locations, such as where to place or move objects. However, these commands can be unreliable, as the robot may get confused (e.g., reaching for the wrong object in scenes with clutter or with multiple instances of the same object). The object detector may also fail, especially when objects are occluded.\n\nNext, some examples of Combination instructions are:\n\n- 'move down to the object at <mushroom> and grasp it'\n\n- 'grab the mushroom at <mushroom on the left> and move it to <plate>'\n\n- 'move the stuffed toy toward the box at <box>'\n\nCombination commands are useful for supplementing the weaknesses of other command types, such as saying 'move right to grasp the object at <object description>' rather than just 'move right and grasp' (if there are multiple objects to the right of the robot). However, being too specific may result in out-of-distribution commands, which the robot policy fails to follow. Additionally, less specific commands can be useful for positioning the robot in a location where it's more likely to succeed.\n\nYou MUST follow these steps when generating your response: \n\n- Step 1: Briefly (1-2 sentences) describe the scene in the current observation, and any important differences from past observations (eg. objects moved, picked up, dropped etc).\n\n- Step 2: Briefly (1 sentence) describe what must happen next to make progress towards the overall task.\n\n- Step 3: Briefly reason (2-3 sentences) about which level of abstraction is most appropriate given the current observation and task progress.\n\n- Step 4: Determine the final steerable command (last line) for the robot to execute. Only the LAST line of your output will be interpreted as the subtask command. In the LAST line, answer ONLY with the subtask instruction that the robot should execute, and NOTHING ELSE.\n\nNote: The robot will ask you for a new instruction after executing for a few steps. If you've issued the same type of command more than once without progress, you MUST issue a command at a different level of abstraction. If you previously provided a command with positions <> (without progress), you MAY NOT use positions in the next command. For example:\n\n- If you previously tried to pick up the mushroom by specifying the mushroom's position, but the robot did not reach the mushroom, next time you can explicitly tell the robot to move in a certain direction (eg. move to the right and down).\n\n- If the robot reached for the wrong object when you told it to pick up the mushroom at <mushroom on the left>. This time, you should give a command at a different level of abstraction: move left to the mushroom and grasp it.\n\nHere are the past observations and commands: [history]\n\nCurrent Obervation: [current\\_observation]\n\nBased on this observation, generate the next command. Remember the instructions: describe the scene, determine what must happen next, determine the best level of abstraction, output the final command. Again, the LAST line of your output will be interpreted as the final steerable, subtask command. In the LAST line, answer ONLY with the subtask instruction that the robot should execute, and NOTHING ELSE.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: prompts/sim-gemini-cache.tex\n================================================\nYou are guiding a robot to complete the task '[self.task\\_instruction]' in its environment by chosing a list of candidate task instructions for the robot to follow given an image of the robot's current observation. There are several kinds of instructions the robot understands, each at a different level of abstraction, detailed below. It is not known apriori which level of abstraction will induce the desired behavior in the robot's low-level language conditioned policy, so your job is to generate candidates that will be processed by a downstream algorithm.\n\nBelow are examples of the kinds of instructions you can generate for the robot.\n \nSome examples of High-level instructions are:\n\n- 'grasp the mushroom in the pot'\n\n- 'wipe the cloth across the table'\n\n- 'move the lid above the pot'\n\n- 'lift the carrot up' \\# Lifting is generally good post-grasping\n\n- 'move towards the stuffed toy'\n\n- 'move the eggplant to the bowl'\n \nThe robot is generally reliable at following high-level commands, especially when interacting with non-novel objects. They can also be used to better understand the scene and robot state, such as by saying 'lift the object' to ascertain if the robot has actually firmly grasped it. However, these commands may fail when interacting with novel objects, as the robot may not recognize them by name. The robot also may also confuse similar objects with each other (e.g., it may mix up a bowl and pot, or multiple instances of the same kind of object).\n\nSome examples of Atomic Motion instructions are:\n\n- 'move left'\n\n- 'move above the bowl'\n\n- 'move down and close'\n\n- 'open the gripper'\n\n- 'move the cloth left'\n\n- 'pull the drawer handle backward'\n\nMotion commands are good for general positioning, such as moving to a pre-grasp pose above the object the robot must interact with. They can also be used for positional corrections, e.g., 'move up and right above the bowl' if the gripper is too low. These commands are also appropriate when the task involves spatial reasoning (e.g., tasks that reference left or right). However, these commands are often underspecified, so the robot may reach for the wrong object if simply told 'move to the right and grasp.' Note that to go to the back of the table, tell the robot to go 'forwards' (it is forwards from the robot's perspective).\n\nNext, some examples of Combination instructions are:\n\n- 'move down to the mushroom and grasp it'\n\n- 'grab the mushroom and move it to the plate on the left'\n\n- 'open the gripper and move right'\n\nCombination commands are useful for supplementing the weaknesses of other command types, such as saying 'move right to grasp the carrot' rather than just 'move right and grasp' (if there are multiple objects to the right of the robot) or 'grasp the carrot on the right' (if there are multiple carrots in the scene). However, being too specific may result in out-of-distribution commands, which the robot policy fails to follow. Additionally, less specific commands can be useful for positioning the robot in a location where it's more likely to succeed.\n\nFinally, there is the 'reset to home' command, which can be issued when the robot is stuck. It is useful for repositioning the robot to a known state.\n\nYou MUST follow these steps when generating your response: \n\n- Step 1: Briefly (1-2 sentences) describe the scene in the current observation, such as enumerating which objects are present and the robot grippers current state. If the robot's gripper is close to an object, think carefully about whether the object has already been grasped, lifted or neither. Think about whether the gripper is currently open or closed.\n\n- Step 2: Briefly (1-2 sentences) enumerate the robot's full sequence of objectives required to complete the task.\n\n- Step 3: Briefly (1 sentences) turn the robot's immediate next objective into a subtask statement. A relatively longer-horizon subtask statement is preferred in this step. Eg. \"pick up the egg and move it to the bowl\" rather than \"grasp the egg\" or \"move down\" or \"close the gripper\". The subtask objective should make sense to execute immediately given the current state.\n\n- Step 4: Briefly (1-2 sentences) think about 1) the overall direction the robot should move in (left, right, forwards, backwards, up, down) and 2) obvious verbs that could be used to instruct the robot (use verbs likely present in robot datasets, without being too extravagant and be sure to PRIORITIZE verbs found in the original task description). \n\n- Step 5: (1-2 sentences) think about how to avoid these common failure modes: confusing objects with the same name, interacting with the object directly in front of the robot rather than the intended object, and executing parts of the command out of order (eg. dropping object prematurely when the command involves both \"moving\" and \"releasing\").\n\n- Step 6: Output the FINAL MASTER LIST of commands for the robot to choose between. The master list should follow this guidance:\n\n- Output exactly four commands. Commands MUST BE EXACTLY THE SAME AS THOSE ON THE LIST PROVIDED BELOW. DO NOT OUTPUT ANY OTHER COMMANDS. The list may not be perfect, choose the best fit.\n\n- Output commands most likley to help the robot succeed, while still being diverse.\n\n- Always output a single atomic motion commands ouptut more subtask commands than any other abstraction type.\n\n- Commands should be diverse in horizon: shorter horizon (eg. \"move above the egg\") and longer-horizon behaviors (\"move the egg to the pot\"), but should not exceed the length of the next subtask.\n\n- Use an indicator (left, right, blue) to distinguish objects of the same name ONLY if the robot is near the wrong copy of that object. DO NOT use the indicator if the robot is currently interacting with the correct copy.\n\n- All commands will be executed IMMEDIATELY (THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT), so do not output forward-looking commands that do not make sense to run at the robot's current state (eg. \"open the gripper\" does not make sense if the robot is not yet at the correct position to release the object. However, \"move the egg to the plate\" does make sense if consistent with the task).\nThe master list should be numbered. DO NOT organize the master list by objective, simply list all the commands together in one numbered list. After the master list, DO NOT OUTPUT ANY OTHER TEXT.\n\nCurrent Obervation: [current\\_observation]\n\nYou must choose commands EXACTLY from this list: [cached\\_commands\\_str]\n\n================================================\nFILE: prompts/sim-gemini-open-ended.tex\n================================================\nYou are guiding a robot to complete the task '[self.task\\_instruction]' in its environment by generating candidate subtask instructions for the robot to follow given an image of the robot's current observation. There are several kinds of instructions the robot understands, each at a different level of abstraction, detailed below. It is not known apriori which level of abstraction will induce the desired behavior in the robot's low-level language conditioned policy, so your job is to generate candidates that will be processed by a downstream algorithm.\n\nBelow are examples of the kinds of instructions you can generate for the robot.\n \nSome examples of High-level instructions are:\n\n- 'grasp the mushroom in the pot'\n\n- 'wipe the cloth across the table'\n\n- 'move the lid above the pot'\n\n- 'lift the carrot up' \\# Lifting is generallly good post-grasping\n\n- 'move towards the stuffed toy'\n\n- 'move the eggplant to the bowl'\n \nThe robot is generally reliable at following high-level commands, especially when interacting with non-novel objects. They can also be used to better understand the scene and robot state, such as by saying 'lift the object' to ascertain if the robot has actually firmly grasped it. However, these commands may fail when interacting with novel objects, as the robot may not recognize them by name. The robot also may also confuse similar objects with each other (e.g., it may mix up a bowl and pot, or multiple instances of the same kind of object).\n\nSome examples of Atomic Motion instructions are:\n\n- 'move left'\n\n- 'move above the bowl'\n\n- 'move down and close'\n\n- 'open the gripper'\n\n- 'move the cloth left'\n\n- 'pull the drawer handle backward'\n\nMotion commands are good for general positioning, such as moving to a pre-grasp pose above the object the robot must interact with. They can also be used for positional corrections, e.g., 'move up and right above the bowl' if the gripper is too low. These commands are also appropriate when the task involves spatial reasoning (e.g., tasks that reference left or right). However, these commands are often underspecified, so the robot may reach for the wrong object if simply told 'move to the right and grasp.' Note that to go to the back of the table, tell the robot to go 'forwards' (it is forwards from the robot's perspective).\n\nNext, some examples of Combination instructions are:\n\n- 'move down to the mushroom and grasp it'\n\n- 'grab the mushroom and move it to the plate on the left'\n\n- 'open the gripper and move right'\n\nCombination commands are useful for supplementing the weaknesses of other command types, such as saying 'move right to grasp the carrot' rather than just 'move right and grasp' (if there are multiple objects to the right of the robot) or 'grasp the carrot on the right' (if there are multiple carrots in the scene). However, being too specific may result in out-of-distribution commands, which the robot policy fails to follow. Additionally, less specific commands can be useful for positioning the robot in a location where it's more likely to succeed.\n\nFinally, there is the 'reset to home' command, which can be issued when the robot is stuck. It is useful for repositioning the robot to a known state.\n\nYou MUST follow these steps when generating your response: \n\n- Step 1: Briefly (1-2 sentences) describe the scene in the current observation, such as enumerating which objects are present and the robot grippers current state. If the robot's gripper is close to an object, think carefully about whether the object has already been grasped, lifted or neither. Think about whether the gripper is currently open or closed.\n\n- Step 2: Briefly (1-2 sentences) enumerate the robot's full sequence of objectives required to complete the task.\n\n- Step 3: Briefly (1 sentences) turn the robot's immediate next objective into a subtask statement. A relatively longer-horizon subtask statement is preferred in this step. Eg. \"pick up the egg and move it to the bowl\" rather than \"grasp the egg\" or \"move down\" or \"close the gripper\". The subtask objective should make sense to execute immediately given the current state.\n\n- Step 4: Briefly (1-2 sentences) think about 1) the overall direction the robot should move in (left, right, forwards, backwards, up, down) and 2) obvious verbs that could be used to instruct the robot (use verbs likely present in robot datasets, without being too extravagant and be sure to PRIORITIZE verbs found in the original task description). \n\n- Step 5: (1-2 sentences) think about how to avoid these common failure modes: confusing objects with the same name, interacting with the object directly in front of the robot rather than the intended object, and executing parts of the command out of order (eg. dropping object prematurely when the command involves both \"moving\" and \"releasing\").\n\n- Step 6: Output the FINAL MASTER LIST of commands for the robot to choose between. The master list should follow this guidance:\n\n- Output commands most likley to help the robot succeed, while still being diverse.\n\n- Output exactly four commands. Always output a single atomic motion commands ouptut more subtask commands than any other abstraction type.\n\n- Commands should be diverse in horizon: shorter horizon (eg. \"move above the egg\") and longer-horizon behaviors (\"move the egg to the pot\"), but should not exceed the length of the next subtask.\n\n- Use an indicator (left, right, blue) to distinguish objects of the same name ONLY if the robot is near the wrong copy of that object. DO NOT use the indicator if the robot is currently interacting with the correct copy.\n\n- All commands will be executed immediately, so do not output forward-looking commands that do not make sense to run at the robot's current state (eg. \"open the gripper\" does not make sense if the robot is not yet at the correct position to release the object. However, \"move the egg to the plate\" does make sense if consistent with the task).\n\nThe master list should be numbered. DO NOT organize the master list by objective, simply list all the commands together in one numbered list. After the master list, DO NOT OUTPUT ANY OTHER TEXT.\n\nCurrent Obervation: [current\\_observation]\n\n================================================\nFILE: prompts/sim-gemini-sp-baseline.tex\n================================================\nYou are guiding a robot to complete a task by generating a subtask instruction for the robot to follow given an image of the robot's current observation, and a history of observations and past commands. The robot is trying to accomplish the overall task: '[self.task\\_description]'. You should keep the rest of the environment unchanged. Note that all objects required for the task are present (no need to search for objects). There are several kinds of instructions the robot understands, each at a different level of abstraction, detailed below. Sometimes, a high-level instruction is sufficient for the robot to make progress towards solving the task, but other times, a more specific command is required.\n\nBelow are examples of the kinds of instructions you can generate for the robot.\n \nSome examples of High-level instructions are:\n\n- 'grasp the mushroom in the pot'\n\n- 'wipe the cloth across the table'\n\n- 'move the lid above the pot'\n\n- 'lift the carrot up' \\# IMPORTANT: Lifting is generallly good post-grasping\n\n- 'move towards the stuffed toy'\n\n- 'drop the eggplant in the bowl'\n \nThe robot is generally reliable at following high-level commands, especially when interacting with non-novel objects. They can also be used to better understand the scene and robot state, such as by saying 'lift the object' to ascertain if the robot has actually firmly grasped it. However, these commands may fail when interacting with novel objects, as the robot may not recognize them by name. The robot also may also confuse similar objects with each other (e.g., it may mix up a bowl and pot, or multiple instances of the same kind of object).\n\nSome examples of Atomic Motion instructions are:\n\n- 'move left'\n\n- 'move right and down'\n\n- 'move down and close'\n\n- 'open the gripper'\n\n- 'move the cloth left'\n\n- 'pull the drawer handle backward'\n\nMotion commands are good for general positioning, such as moving to a pre-grasp pose above the object the robot must interact with. They can also be used for more minor corrections, e.g., 'move up and right above the bowl' if the gripper is too low. These commands are also appropriate when the task involves spatial reasoning (e.g., tasks that reference left or right) or moving in unconventional ways (e.g., lifting the arm to grasp something on a high shelf). However, these commands are often underspecified, so the robot may reach for the wrong object if simply told 'move to the right and grasp.'\n\nNext, some examples of Combination instructions are:\n\n- 'move down to the object and grasp it'\n\n- 'grab the mushroom and move it to the plate'\n\n- 'move the stuffed toy toward the box and drop it in'\n\nCombination commands are useful for supplementing the weaknesses of other command types, such as saying 'move right to grasp the object' rather than just 'grasp the object' (if there are multiple objects near the robot). However, being too specific may result in out-of-distribution commands, which the robot policy fails to follow. Additionally, less specific commands can be useful for positioning the robot in a location where it's more likely to succeed.\n\nFinally, there is the 'reset to home' command, which can be issued when the robot is stuck. It is useful for repositioning the robot to a known state. Sometimes, this command needs to be issues multiple times in a row to get the robot unstuck.\n\nYou MUST follow these steps when generating your response: \n\n- Step 1: Briefly (1-2 sentences) describe the scene in the current observation, and any important differences from past observations (eg. objects moved, picked up, dropped etc).\n\n- Step 2: Briefly (1 sentence) describe what must happen next to make progress towards the overall task.\n\n- Step 3: Briefly reason (2-3 sentences) about which level of abstraction is most appropriate given the current observation and task progress.\n\n- Step 4: Determine the final steerable command (last line) for the robot to execute. Only the LAST line of your output will be interpreted as the subtask command. In the LAST line, answer ONLY with the subtask instruction that the robot should execute, and NOTHING ELSE.\n\nNote: The robot will ask you for a new instruction after executing for a few steps. If you've issued the same type of command more than once without progress, you MUST issue a command at a different level of abstraction. For example:\n\n- If you previously tried to pick up the mushroom by specifying the mushroom by name, but the robot did not reach the mushroom, next time, for example, you can explicitly tell the robot to move in a certain direction (eg. move to the right and down).\n\nHere are the past observations and commands: [history]\n\nCurrent Obervation: [current\\_observation]\n\nBased on this observation, generate the next command. Remember the instructions: describe the scene, determine what must happen next, determine the best level of abstraction, output the final command. Again, the LAST line of your output will be interpreted as the final steerable, subtask command. In the LAST line, answer ONLY with the subtask instruction that the robot should execute, and NOTHING ELSE.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: related-work.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Related Work}\n\n\n\\textbf{RL improvement of VLAs.}\nThere has been significant progress in developing general-purpose language-conditioned robot policies, such as vision-language-action models (VLAs) \\cite{brohan2022rt,gu2023rt,team2024octo,kim2024openvla,black2024pi0,bjorck2025gr00t,team2025gemini,liu2025rdt,intelligence2025pi_,zha2026lap}.\nWhile enabling effective task-solving in settings similar to their training data, VLAs often struggle to adapt to new tasks.\nTo address this, a variety of approaches for RL improvement of VLAs have been proposed. These include training a residual policy \\citep{johannink2018residual,ankile2025imitation, yuan2024policy, julg2025refined, dong2025expo, xiao2025self, xu2026rl, sun2026prior}, steering the VLA's denoising process (when the VLA is a flow or diffusion model) \\cite{wagenmaker2025steering}, augmenting the VLA with ``advantage conditioning'' \\cite{amin2025pi}, and others \\citep{mark2024policy, nakamoto2024steering, chen2025conrft, hu2025flare, guo2025improving, lu2025vla, liu2025can}. However, these works all run RL at the level of \\emph{robot actions}, typically fixing the VLA's task prompt. In contrast, we run RL over the \\emph{language prompt itself}, which we show unlocks novel task-solving abilities, enabling VLAs to generalize beyond single-task proficiency to solve novel long-horizon tasks. Our work is also related to hierarchical RL and skill learning \\cite{daniel2016hierarchical,kulkarni2016hierarchical,peng2017deeploco,riedmiller2018learning,nachum2018data,gehring2021hierarchical,merel2018neural,ajay2020opal,singh2020parrot,pertsch2021accelerating,nasiriany2022learning,wilcoxson2024leveraging}, where a high-level policy learns to direct a low-level policy to maximize reward. While conceptually similar, unlike these works we focus on the setting where the ``low-level policy'' is a VLA and the interface between both policies is language.\\loose\n\n\\textbf{Steering robots with language.}\nMany works consider how a language-conditioned policy's prompt should be chosen for successful robot task-solving. Early works in this vein explore using LLMs or VLMs to generate useful instructions for solving real-world tasks\n\\cite{huang2022language, zeng2022socratic, huang2022inner, driess2023palm}, or rely on pre-programmed language-conditioned action primitives or ``skill'' policies as the language-to-robot interface \\cite{huang2023voxposer, liang2023code, li2023interactive, zhang2023bootstrap, ha2023scaling}. More recently, several works have considered combining a VLM or LLM with a VLA or other language-conditioned policy, using the former to select the language prompts for the latter \\cite{ahn2022can,shi2024yell,shi2025hi,chen2026steerable}. Perhaps most similar to our work is \\cite{shah2025learning}---which selects a VLA's language command with a VLM, and utilizes the in-context learning ability of the VLM to adapt and improve the prompt based on past observations---and the work of \\cite{kwok2026scaling}, which trains a prompt-action verifier using offline data, and then selects the prompt to use online from a fixed set of initial prompts based on verifier score. \nHowever, none of these works incorporate RL or other forms of online improvement, which we find to be critical to achieving robust task-solving behavior.\n\n\n\\textbf{Language-based RL outside of robotics.}\nWhile our focus is on robotics, a variety of other domains also seek to integrate RL and language. \nOur approach can be seen as a form of \\emph{prompt optimization}, commonly used to elicit desired capabilities from language models \\cite{shin2020autoprompt,zhou2022large,pryzant2023automatic}, and the most relevant of which are RL-based methods \\cite{deng2022rlprompt,zhang2022tempera,jung2024discrete,wang2024promptagent,guo2023evoprompt,lu2022dynamic,jafari2024morl,batorski2025prl, kong2024prewrite, kwon2024stableprompt}. Outside of language models, language has also been used as a key tool in deep RL, enabling effective exploration \\cite{mirchandani2021ella,mu2022improving,tam2022semantic,du2023guiding}, reward shaping \\cite{carta2022eager,goyal2019using}, state abstraction design \\cite{peng2024learning}, and more \\cite{branavan2012learning,hermann2017grounded,misra2017mapping,narasimhan2018grounding}. Though these works seek to optimize language prompts with RL and use language as an abstraction to enable efficient learning, the specific challenges we face---in particular, the need for high sample-efficiency in real-world robotic deployments---necessitate a very different algorithmic strategy than those proposed here. \\loose\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091159,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31959"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31959"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Xinyu Hou"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Xinyu Hou, Xiaoming Li, Zongsheng Yue, Chen Change Loy"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"AnyBokeh: Physics-Guided Any-to-Any Bokeh Editing with Optical Fingerprint Transfer"},"comments":{"kind":"null"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.CV"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Depth-of-field control is a fundamental tool in photography, yet post-capture bokeh editing from a single image remains challenging. A practical editor should handle images captured under arbitrary focus and aperture settings. Existing methods typically assume an all-in-focus input, or first recover an all-in-focus image before rendering new bokeh. Such pipelines can discard useful blur cues from the source image and propagate reconstruction artifacts into the final edit. We introduce AnyBokeh, a physics-guided framework for any-to-any bokeh editing. Instead of treating source blur merely as a degradation to be removed, AnyBokeh estimates the source blur state with a signed circle-of-confusion map and a disparity map. By modeling the linear relation between signed circle of confusion and disparity difference, AnyBokeh estimates a source-specific optical fingerprint and transfers the source optical characteristics to the desired focus and aperture setting. A generative editor conditioned on both source and target circle-of-confusion maps then performs relative blur synthesis, enabling spatially adaptive deblurring, preservation, and defocus rendering. To support physically supervised learning, we further construct a high-fidelity synthetic dataset with accurate depth, focus distance, and full EXIF metadata. Experiments on real-world benchmarks show that AnyBokeh achieves faithful and controllable editing across any-to-any bokeh editing, all-in-focus-to-bokeh rendering, and defocus deblurring, while avoiding all-in-focus reconstruction and test-time bokeh-level calibration commonly required by existing approaches. The code and dataset will be available at https://github.com/itsmag11/AnyBokeh."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:01:28 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:01:28 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Hou","Xinyu",""],["Li","Xiaoming",""],["Yue","Zongsheng",""],["Loy","Chen Change",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Hou\",\n \"Xinyu\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Li\",\n \"Xiaoming\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Yue\",\n \"Zongsheng\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Loy\",\n \"Chen Change\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: main.bbl\n================================================\n\\begin{thebibliography}{44}\n\\providecommand{\\natexlab}[1]{#1}\n\\providecommand{\\url}[1]{\\texttt{#1}}\n\\expandafter\\ifx\\csname urlstyle\\endcsname\\relax\n \\providecommand{\\doi}[1]{doi: #1}\\else\n \\providecommand{\\doi}{doi: \\begingroup \\urlstyle{rm}\\Url}\\fi\n\n\\bibitem[Abuolaim and Brown(2020)]{abuolaim2020defocus}\nAbdullah Abuolaim and Michael~S Brown.\n\\newblock Defocus deblurring using dual-pixel data.\n\\newblock In \\emph{European conference on computer vision (ECCV)}, 2020.\n\n\\bibitem[Bando and Nishita(2007)]{bando2007towards}\nYosuke Bando and Tomoyuki Nishita.\n\\newblock Towards digital refocusing from a single photograph.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications}, pages 363--372, 2007.\n\n\\bibitem[Barron et~al.(2015)Barron, Adams, Shih, and Hernández]{barron2015fast}\nJonathan~T. Barron, Andrew Adams, YiChang Shih, and Carlos Hernández.\n\\newblock Fast bilateral-space stereo for synthetic defocus.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)}, 2015.\n\n\\bibitem[Bochkovskii et~al.(2025)Bochkovskii, Delaunoy, Germain, Santos, Zhou, Richter, and Koltun]{depthpro}\nAleksei Bochkovskii, Ama\\\"{e}l Delaunoy, Hugo Germain, Marcel Santos, Yichao Zhou, Stephan~R. Richter, and Vladlen Koltun.\n\\newblock {Depth Pro}: Sharp monocular metric depth in less than a second.\n\\newblock In \\emph{International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Busam et~al.(2019)Busam, Hog, McDonagh, and Slabaugh]{busam2019sterefo}\nBenjamin Busam, Matthieu Hog, Steven McDonagh, and Gregory Slabaugh.\n\\newblock {SteReFo}: Efficient image refocusing with stereo vision.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)}, 2019.\n\n\\bibitem[Chen et~al.(2025)Chen, Xie, Peng, Sun, Su, Yang, and Liu]{chen2025quadpixel}\nHang Chen, Yin Xie, Xiaoxiu Peng, Lihu Sun, Wenkai Su, Xiaodong Yang, and Chengming Liu.\n\\newblock Quad-pixel image defocus deblurring: A new benchmark and model.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Ding et~al.(2022)Ding, Ma, Wang, and Simoncelli]{dists}\nKeyan Ding, Kede Ma, Shiqi Wang, and Eero~P. Simoncelli.\n\\newblock Image quality assessment: Unifying structure and texture similarity.\n\\newblock \\emph{IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI)}, 44\\penalty0 (5):\\penalty0 2567--2581, 2022.\n\n\\bibitem[{Epic Games}()]{unrealengine}\n{Epic Games}.\n\\newblock Unreal engine.\n\n\\bibitem[Fortes et~al.(2025)Fortes, Wei, Zhou, and Pan]{fortes2025bokehdiffusion}\nArmando Fortes, Tianyi Wei, Shangchen Zhou, and Xingang Pan.\n\\newblock {Bokeh Diffusion}: Defocus blur control in text-to-image diffusion models.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH Asia 2025 Conference Papers}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Hach et~al.(2015)Hach, Steurer, Amruth, and Pappenheim]{hach2015cinematic}\nThomas Hach, Johannes Steurer, Arvind Amruth, and Artur Pappenheim.\n\\newblock Cinematic bokeh rendering for real scenes.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Visual Media Production}, 2015.\n\n\\bibitem[Haeberli and Akeley(1990)]{haeberli1990accumulation}\nPaul Haeberli and Kurt Akeley.\n\\newblock The accumulation buffer: hardware support for high-quality rendering.\n\\newblock \\emph{International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques}, 1990.\n\n\\bibitem[Heusel et~al.(2017)Heusel, Ramsauer, Unterthiner, Nessler, and Hochreiter]{fid}\nMartin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter.\n\\newblock Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, page 6629–6640, 2017.\n\n\\bibitem[Hu et~al.(2022)Hu, Shen, Wallis, Allen-Zhu, Li, Wang, Wang, and Chen]{hu2022lora}\nEdward~J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen.\n\\newblock Lo{RA}: Low-rank adaptation of large language models.\n\\newblock In \\emph{International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)}, 2022.\n\n\\bibitem[Ignatov et~al.(2020)Ignatov, Patel, and Timofte]{ignatov2020rendering}\nAndrey Ignatov, Jagruti Patel, and Radu Timofte.\n\\newblock Rendering natural camera bokeh effect with deep learning.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops}, 2020.\n\n\\bibitem[Kraus and Strengert(2007)]{kraus2007depth}\nM. Kraus and M. Strengert.\n\\newblock Depth-of-field rendering by pyramidal image processing.\n\\newblock \\emph{Computer Graphics Forum}, 26\\penalty0 (3):\\penalty0 645--654, 2007.\n\n\\bibitem[Labs(2024)]{flux2024}\nBlack~Forest Labs.\n\\newblock Flux.\n\\newblock \\url{https://github.com/black-forest-labs/flux}, 2024.\n\n\\bibitem[Lee et~al.(2021)Lee, Son, Rim, Cho, and Lee]{Lee2021IFAN}\nJunyong Lee, Hyeongseok Son, Jaesung Rim, Sunghyun Cho, and Seungyong Lee.\n\\newblock Iterative filter adaptive network for single image defocus deblurring.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)}, 2021.\n\n\\bibitem[Lee et~al.(2009)Lee, Eisemann, and Seidel]{lee2009depth}\nSungkil Lee, Elmar Eisemann, and Hans-Peter Seidel.\n\\newblock Depth-of-field rendering with multiview synthesis.\n\\newblock \\emph{ACM Transactions on Graphics}, 28\\penalty0 (5):\\penalty0 1–6, 2009.\n\n\\bibitem[Lee et~al.(2010)Lee, Eisemann, and Seidel]{lee2010realtime}\nSungkil Lee, Elmar Eisemann, and Hans-Peter Seidel.\n\\newblock Real-time lens blur effects and focus control.\n\\newblock \\emph{ACM Transactions on Graphics}, 29:\\penalty0 65:1--65:7, 2010.\n\n\\bibitem[Loshchilov and Hutter(2019)]{loshchilov2018adamw}\nIlya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter.\n\\newblock Decoupled weight decay regularization.\n\\newblock In \\emph{International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)}, 2019.\n\n\\bibitem[Pan et~al.(2021)Pan, Chowdhury, Hartley, Liu, Zhang, and Li]{pan2021dual}\nLiyuan Pan, Shah Chowdhury, Richard Hartley, Miaomiao Liu, Hongguang Zhang, and Hongdong Li.\n\\newblock Dual pixel exploration: Simultaneous depth estimation and image restoration.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)}, 2021.\n\n\\bibitem[Peebles and Xie(2023)]{Peebles2023DiT}\nWilliam Peebles and Saining Xie.\n\\newblock Scalable diffusion models with transformers.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)}, 2023.\n\n\\bibitem[Peng et~al.(2021)Peng, Luo, Xian, and Cao]{peng2021interactive}\nJuewen Peng, Xianrui Luo, Ke Xian, and Zhiguo Cao.\n\\newblock Interactive portrait bokeh rendering system.\n\\newblock In \\emph{IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)}, 2021.\n\n\\bibitem[Peng et~al.(2022{\\natexlab{a}})Peng, Cao, Luo, Lu, Xian, and Zhang]{Peng2022BokehMe}\nJuewen Peng, Zhiguo Cao, Xianrui Luo, Hao Lu, Ke Xian, and Jianming Zhang.\n\\newblock {BokehMe}: When neural rendering meets classical rendering.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)}, 2022{\\natexlab{a}}.\n\n\\bibitem[Peng et~al.(2022{\\natexlab{b}})Peng, Zhang, Luo, Lu, Xian, and Cao]{Peng2022MPIB}\nJuewen Peng, Jianming Zhang, Xianrui Luo, Hao Lu, Ke Xian, and Zhiguo Cao.\n\\newblock {MPIB}: An mpi-based bokeh rendering framework for realistic partial occlusion effects.\n\\newblock In \\emph{European conference on computer vision (ECCV)}, 2022{\\natexlab{b}}.\n\n\\bibitem[Peng et~al.(2025)Peng, Cao, Luo, Xian, Tang, Zhang, and Lin]{bokehme++}\nJuewen Peng, Zhiguo Cao, Xianrui Luo, Ke Xian, Wenfeng Tang, Jianming Zhang, and Guosheng Lin.\n\\newblock {BokehMe++}: Harmonious fusion of classical and neural rendering for versatile bokeh creation.\n\\newblock \\emph{IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI)}, 47\\penalty0 (3):\\penalty0 1530--1547, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Potmesil and Chakravarty(1981)]{potmesil1981lens}\nMichael Potmesil and Indranil Chakravarty.\n\\newblock A lens and aperture camera model for synthetic image generation.\n\\newblock In \\emph{International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques}, 1981.\n\n\\bibitem[Quan et~al.(2023)Quan, Yao, and Ji]{quan2023single}\nYuhui Quan, Xin Yao, and Hui Ji.\n\\newblock Single image defocus deblurring via implicit neural inverse kernels.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)}, 2023.\n\n\\bibitem[Ruan et~al.(2022)Ruan, Chen, Li, and Lam]{ruan2022drbnet}\nLingyan Ruan, Bin Chen, Jizhou Li, and Miuling Lam.\n\\newblock Learning to deblur using light field generated and real defocus images.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR)}, 2022.\n\n\\bibitem[Seizinger et~al.(2025)Seizinger, Vasluianu, Conde, Wu, and Timofte]{seizinger2025bokehlicious}\nTim Seizinger, Florin-Alexandru Vasluianu, Marcos Conde, Zongwei Wu, and Radu Timofte.\n\\newblock Bokehlicious: Photorealistic bokeh rendering with controllable apertures.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Sheng et~al.(2024)Sheng, Yu, Ling, Cao, Zhang, Lu, Xian, Lin, and Benes]{sheng2024drbokeh}\nYichen Sheng, Zixun Yu, Lu Ling, Zhiwen Cao, Xuaner Zhang, Xin Lu, Ke Xian, Haiting Lin, and Bedrich Benes.\n\\newblock {Dr. Bokeh}: Differentiable occlusion-aware bokeh rendering.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)}, 2024.\n\n\\bibitem[Tang et~al.(2024)Tang, Xu, Zhou, Wei, Han, Cao, and Lasser]{tang2024prior}\nPeng Tang, Zhiqiang Xu, Chunlai Zhou, Pengfei Wei, Peng Han, Xin Cao, and Tobias Lasser.\n\\newblock Prior and prediction inverse kernel transformer for single image defocus deblurring.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence}, 2024.\n\n\\bibitem[Tuan~Mu et~al.(2025)Tuan~Mu, Huang, and Liu]{Genfocus2025}\nChun-Wei Tuan~Mu, Jia-Bin Huang, and Yu-Lun Liu.\n\\newblock Generative refocusing: Flexible defocus control from a single image.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16923}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Wadhwa et~al.(2018)Wadhwa, Garg, Jacobs, Feldman, Kanazawa, Carroll, Movshovitz-Attias, Barron, Pritch, and Levoy]{scattering}\nNeal Wadhwa, Rahul Garg, David~E. Jacobs, Bryan~E. Feldman, Nori Kanazawa, Robert Carroll, Yair Movshovitz-Attias, Jonathan~T. Barron, Yael Pritch, and Marc Levoy.\n\\newblock Synthetic depth-of-field with a single-camera mobile phone.\n\\newblock \\emph{ACM Transactions on Graphics}, 37\\penalty0 (4):\\penalty0 1–13, 2018.\n\n\\bibitem[Wang et~al.(2025)Wang, Chen, Xu, Liu, and Zhao]{wang2025diffcamera}\nYiyang Wang, Xi Chen, Xiaogang Xu, Yu Liu, and Hengshuang Zhao.\n\\newblock {DiffCamera}: Arbitrary refocusing on images.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH Asia 2025 Conference Papers}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Wu et~al.(2012)Wu, Zheng, Hu, and Xu]{wu2012rendering}\nJiaze Wu, Changwen Zheng, Xiaohui Hu, and Fanjiang Xu.\n\\newblock Rendering realistic spectral bokeh due to lens stops and aberrations.\n\\newblock \\emph{The Visual Computer}, 29, 2012.\n\n\\bibitem[Yang et~al.(2023)Yang, Pan, Liu, and Liu]{yang2023k3dn}\nYan Yang, Liyuan Pan, Liu Liu, and Miaomiao Liu.\n\\newblock {K3DN}: Disparity-aware kernel estimation for dual-pixel defocus deblurring.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)}, 2023.\n\n\\bibitem[Yu et~al.(2010)Yu, Wang, and Yu]{yu2010realtime}\nXuan Yu, Rui Wang, and Jingyi Yu.\n\\newblock Real-time depth of field rendering via dynamic light field generation and filtering.\n\\newblock \\emph{Computer Graphics Forum}, 29\\penalty0 (7):\\penalty0 2099--2107, 2010.\n\n\\bibitem[Yuan et~al.(2024)Yuan, Wang, Sheng, Chennuri, Zhang, and Chan]{Yuan_2024_GenPhoto}\nYu Yuan, Xijun Wang, Yichen Sheng, Prateek Chennuri, Xingguang Zhang, and Stanley Chan.\n\\newblock Generative photography: Scene-consistent camera control for realistic text-to-image synthesis.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv: 2412.02168}, 2024.\n\n\\bibitem[Zamir et~al.(2022)Zamir, Arora, Khan, Hayat, Khan, and Yang]{Zamir2021Restormer}\nSyed~Waqas Zamir, Aditya Arora, Salman Khan, Munawar Hayat, Fahad~Shahbaz Khan, and Ming-Hsuan Yang.\n\\newblock Restormer: Efficient transformer for high-resolution image restoration.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR)}, 2022.\n\n\\bibitem[Zhang et~al.(2018)Zhang, Isola, Efros, Shechtman, and Wang]{lpips}\nRichard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei~A. Efros, Eli Shechtman, and Oliver Wang.\n\\newblock The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)}, 2018.\n\n\\bibitem[Zheng et~al.(2024)Zheng, Gao, Fan, Liu, Laaksonen, Ouyang, and Sebe]{zheng2024birefnet}\nPeng Zheng, Dehong Gao, Deng-Ping Fan, Li Liu, Jorma Laaksonen, Wanli Ouyang, and Nicu Sebe.\n\\newblock Bilateral reference for high-resolution dichotomous image segmentation.\n\\newblock \\emph{CAAI Artificial Intelligence Research}, 3:\\penalty0 9150038, 2024.\n\n\\bibitem[Zhu et~al.(2025)Zhu, Fan, Zhang, Chen, Zhang, Xu, and Shi]{zhu2025bokehdiff}\nChengxuan Zhu, Qingnan Fan, Qi Zhang, Jinwei Chen, Huaqi Zhang, Chao Xu, and Boxin Shi.\n\\newblock {BokehDiff}: Neural lens blur with one-step diffusion.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Zhu et~al.(2013)Zhu, Cohen, Schiller, and Milanfar]{zhu2013estimating}\nXiang Zhu, Scott Cohen, Stephen Schiller, and Peyman Milanfar.\n\\newblock Estimating spatially varying defocus blur from a single image.\n\\newblock \\emph{IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (TIP)}, 22\\penalty0 (12):\\penalty0 4879--4891, 2013.\n\n\\end{thebibliography}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass{article}\n\n% if you need to pass options to natbib, use, e.g.:\n% \\PassOptionsToPackage{numbers, compress}{natbib}\n% before loading neurips_2026\n\\PassOptionsToPackage{numbers, compress}{natbib}\n\n% The authors should use one of these tracks.\n% Before accepting by the NeurIPS conference, select one of the options below.\n% 0. \"default\" for submission\n% \\usepackage{neurips_2026}\n% the \"default\" option is equal to the \"main\" option, which is used for the Main Track with double-blind reviewing.\n% 1. \"main\" option is used for the Main Track\n % \\usepackage[main]{neurips_2026}\n% 2. \"position\" option is used for the Position Paper Track\n% \\usepackage[position]{neurips_2026}\n% 3. \"eandd\" option is used for the Evaluations & Datasets Track\n % \\usepackage[eandd]{neurips_2026}\n % if you need to opt-in for a single-blind submission in the E&D track:\n %\\usepackage[eandd, nonanonymous]{neurips_2026}\n% 4. \"creativeai\" option is used for the Creative AI Track\n% \\usepackage[creativeai]{neurips_2026}\n% 5. \"sglblindworkshop\" option is used for the Workshop with single-blind reviewing\n % \\usepackage[sglblindworkshop]{neurips_2026}\n% 6. \"dblblindworkshop\" option is used for the Workshop with double-blind reviewing\n% \\usepackage[dblblindworkshop]{neurips_2026}\n\n% After being accepted, the authors should add \"final\" behind the track to compile a camera-ready version.\n% 1. Main Track\n % \\usepackage[main, final]{neurips_2026}\n% 2. Position Paper Track\n% \\usepackage[position, final]{neurips_2026}\n% 3. Evaluations & Datasets Track\n % \\usepackage[eandd, final]{neurips_2026}\n% 4. Creative AI Track\n% \\usepackage[creativeai, final]{neurips_2026}\n% 5. Workshop with single-blind reviewing\n% \\usepackage[sglblindworkshop, final]{neurips_2026}\n% 6. Workshop with double-blind reviewing\n% \\usepackage[dblblindworkshop, final]{neurips_2026}\n% Note. For the workshop paper template, both \\title{} and \\workshoptitle{} are required, with the former indicating the paper title shown in the title and the latter indicating the workshop title displayed in the footnote.\n% For workshops (5., 6.), the authors should add the name of the workshop, \"\\workshoptitle\" command is used to set the workshop title.\n% \\workshoptitle{WORKSHOP TITLE}\n\n% \"preprint\" option is used for arXiv or other preprint submissions\n \\usepackage[preprint]{neurips_2026}\n\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % allow utf-8 input\n\\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % use 8-bit T1 fonts\n\\usepackage{hyperref} % hyperlinks\n\\usepackage{url} % simple URL typesetting\n\\usepackage{booktabs} % professional-quality tables\n\\usepackage{amsfonts} % blackboard math symbols\n\\usepackage{nicefrac} % compact symbols for 1/2, etc.\n\\usepackage{microtype} % microtypography\n\\usepackage{xcolor} % colors\n\\definecolor{viridisgreen}{HTML}{5EC962}\n\n% Added packages\n\\usepackage{pifont}% http://ctan.org/pkg/pifont\n\\newcommand{\\cmark}{\\ding{51}}%\n\\newcommand{\\xmark}{\\ding{55}}%\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{multirow}\n\\usepackage{makecell}\n\\usepackage{pifont}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{wrapfig}\n\\usepackage[table]{xcolor}\n\\definecolor{customblue}{HTML}{4C78A8}\n\n\\title{AnyBokeh: Physics-Guided Any-to-Any Bokeh Editing with Optical Fingerprint Transfer}\n\n\\author{%\n Xinyu Hou \\quad Xiaoming Li \\quad Zongsheng Yue \\quad Chen Change Loy \\\\\n S-Lab, College of Computing \\& Data Science \\\\\n Nanyang Technological University \\\\\n Singapore, 639798 \\\\\n \\texttt{\\{xinyu.hou, ccloy\\}@ntu.edu.sg}, \\texttt{\\{csxmli, zsyzam\\}@gmail.com}\n}\n\n\n% \\author{%\n% Xinyu Hou \\\\\n% S-Lab, Nanyang Technological University\\\\\n% \\texttt{xinyu.hou@ntu.edu.sg} \\\\\n% % examples of more authors\n% \\And\n% Xiaoming Li \\\\\n% S-Lab, Nanyang Technological University\\\\\n% \\texttt{csxmli@gmail.com} \\\\\n% \\AND\n% Zongsheng Yue \\\\\n% S-Lab, Nanyang Technological University\\\\\n% \\texttt{zsyzam@gmail.com} \\\\\n% \\And\n% Chen Change Loy \\\\\n% S-Lab, Nanyang Technological University\\\\\n% \\texttt{ccloy@ntu.edu.sg} \\\\\n% }\n\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\\input{sections/0_abstract}\n\\input{sections/1_introduction}\n\\input{sections/2_related_work}\n\\input{sections/3_methodology}\n\\input{sections/4_experiments}\n\\input{sections/5_discussion}\n\\input{sections/6_conclusion}\n\n\n\\newpage\n{\n \\small\n \\bibliographystyle{ieeenat_fullname}\n \\bibliography{main}\n}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n================================================\nFILE: neurips_2026.sty\n================================================\n% partial rewrite of the LaTeX2e package for submissions to the\n% Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS):\n%\n% - uses more LaTeX conventions\n% - line numbers at submission time replaced with aligned numbers from\n% lineno package\n% - \\nipsfinalcopy replaced with [final] package option\n% - automatically loads times package for authors\n% - loads natbib automatically; this can be suppressed with the\n% [nonatbib] package option\n% - adds foot line to first page identifying the conference\n% - adds preprint option for submission to e.g. arXiv\n% - conference acronym modified\n% - update foot line to display the track name\n%\n% Roman Garnett (garnett@wustl.edu) and the many authors of\n% nips15submit_e.sty, including MK and drstrip@sandia\n%\n% last revision: January 2026\n\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesPackage{neurips_2026}[2026-01-29 NeurIPS 2026 submission/camera-ready style file]\n\n% declare final option, which creates camera-ready copy\n\\newif\\if@neuripsfinal\\@neuripsfinalfalse\n\\DeclareOption{final}{\n \\@neuripsfinaltrue\n \\@anonymousfalse\n}\n\n% declare nonatbib option, which does not load natbib in case of\n% package clash (users can pass options to natbib via\n% \\PassOptionsToPackage)\n\\newif\\if@natbib\\@natbibtrue\n\\DeclareOption{nonatbib}{\n \\@natbibfalse\n}\n\n% declare preprint option, which creates a preprint version ready for\n% upload to, e.g., arXiv\n\\newif\\if@preprint\\@preprintfalse\n\\DeclareOption{preprint}{\n \\@preprinttrue\n \\@anonymousfalse\n}\n\n% determine the track of the paper in camera-ready mode\n\\newif\\if@main\\@maintrue\n\\DeclareOption{main}{\n \\@maintrue\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear).}\n}\n\\newif\\if@position\\@positionfalse\n\\DeclareOption{position}{\n \\@positiontrue\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear). Position Paper Track.}\n}\n\\newif\\if@eandd\\@eanddfalse\n\\DeclareOption{eandd}{\n \\@eanddtrue\n\\if@neuripsfinal\\@anonymousfalse\\else\\if@preprint\\@anonymousfalse\\else\\@anonymoustrue\\fi\\fi\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear). Track on Evaluations and Datasets.} \n}\n\\newif\\if@creativeai\\@creativeaifalse\n\\DeclareOption{creativeai}{\n \\@creativeaitrue\n \\@anonymousfalse\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear). Creative AI Track.}\n}\n\n% For anonymous or non-anonymous\n\\newif\\if@anonymous\\@anonymoustrue\n\n% For workshop papers\n\\newcommand{\\@workshoptitle}{}\n\\newcommand{\\workshoptitle}[1]{\\renewcommand{\\@workshoptitle}{#1}}\n\n\\newif\\if@workshop\\@workshopfalse\n\\DeclareOption{sglblindworkshop}{\n \\@workshoptrue\n \\@anonymousfalse\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear). Workshop: \\@workshoptitle.}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{dblblindworkshop}{\n \\@workshoptrue\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear). Workshop: \\@workshoptitle.}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{nonanonymous}{\n \\@anonymousfalse\n}\n\n\\ProcessOptions\\relax\n\n% fonts\n\\renewcommand{\\rmdefault}{ptm}\n\\renewcommand{\\sfdefault}{phv}\n\n% change this every year for notice string at bottom\n\\newcommand{\\@neuripsordinal}{40th}\n\\newcommand{\\@neuripsyear}{2026}\n\\newcommand{\\@neuripslocation}{Sydney}\n\n% acknowledgments\n\\usepackage{environ}\n\\newcommand{\\acksection}{\\section*{Acknowledgments and Disclosure of Funding}}\n\\NewEnviron{ack}{%\n \\acksection\n \\BODY\n}\n\n\n% load natbib unless told otherwise\n\\if@natbib\n \\RequirePackage{natbib}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n\n\n% set page geometry\n\\usepackage[verbose=true,letterpaper]{geometry}\n\\AtBeginDocument{\n \\newgeometry{\n textheight=9in,\n textwidth=5.5in,\n top=1in,\n headheight=12pt,\n headsep=25pt,\n footskip=30pt\n }\n \\@ifpackageloaded{fullpage}\n {\\PackageWarning{neurips_2026}{fullpage package not allowed! Overwriting formatting.}}\n {}\n}\n\n\\widowpenalty=10000\n\\clubpenalty=10000\n\\flushbottom\n\\sloppy\n\n\n% font sizes with reduced leading\n\\renewcommand{\\normalsize}{%\n \\@setfontsize\\normalsize\\@xpt\\@xipt\n \\abovedisplayskip 7\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 5\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus 3\\p@\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 4\\p@ \\@plus 3\\p@ \\@minus 3\\p@\n}\n\\normalsize\n\\renewcommand{\\small}{%\n \\@setfontsize\\small\\@ixpt\\@xpt\n \\abovedisplayskip 6\\p@ \\@plus 1.5\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus 2\\p@\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 3\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@\n}\n\\renewcommand{\\footnotesize}{\\@setfontsize\\footnotesize\\@ixpt\\@xpt}\n\\renewcommand{\\scriptsize}{\\@setfontsize\\scriptsize\\@viipt\\@viiipt}\n\\renewcommand{\\tiny}{\\@setfontsize\\tiny\\@vipt\\@viipt}\n\\renewcommand{\\large}{\\@setfontsize\\large\\@xiipt{14}}\n\\renewcommand{\\Large}{\\@setfontsize\\Large\\@xivpt{16}}\n\\renewcommand{\\LARGE}{\\@setfontsize\\LARGE\\@xviipt{20}}\n\\renewcommand{\\huge}{\\@setfontsize\\huge\\@xxpt{23}}\n\\renewcommand{\\Huge}{\\@setfontsize\\Huge\\@xxvpt{28}}\n\n\n% Force \\tiny to be no smaller than 6pt\n\\renewcommand{\\tiny}{\\fontsize{6pt}{7pt}\\selectfont}\n\n% Force \\scriptsize to be no smaller than 7pt\n\\renewcommand{\\scriptsize}{\\fontsize{7pt}{8pt}\\selectfont}\n\n% Force \\footnotesize to be no smaller than 8pt\n\\renewcommand{\\footnotesize}{\\fontsize{8pt}{9.5pt}\\selectfont}\n\n% sections with less space\n\\providecommand{\\section}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\section}{%\n \\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}%\n {-2.0ex \\@plus -0.5ex \\@minus -0.2ex}%\n { 1.5ex \\@plus 0.3ex \\@minus 0.2ex}%\n {\\large\\bf\\raggedright}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\subsection}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\subsection}{%\n \\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}%\n {-1.8ex \\@plus -0.5ex \\@minus -0.2ex}%\n { 0.8ex \\@plus 0.2ex}%\n {\\normalsize\\bf\\raggedright}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\subsubsection}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\subsubsection}{%\n \\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}%\n {-1.5ex \\@plus -0.5ex \\@minus -0.2ex}%\n { 0.5ex \\@plus 0.2ex}%\n {\\normalsize\\bf\\raggedright}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\paragraph}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\paragraph}{%\n \\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}%\n {1.5ex \\@plus 0.5ex \\@minus 0.2ex}%\n {-1em}%\n {\\normalsize\\bf}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\subparagraph}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\subparagraph}{%\n \\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\\z@}%\n {1.5ex \\@plus 0.5ex \\@minus 0.2ex}%\n {-1em}%\n {\\normalsize\\bf}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\subsubsubsection}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\subsubsubsection}{%\n \\vskip5pt{\\noindent\\normalsize\\rm\\raggedright}%\n}\n\n% float placement\n\\renewcommand{\\topfraction }{0.85}\n\\renewcommand{\\bottomfraction }{0.4}\n\\renewcommand{\\textfraction }{0.1}\n\\renewcommand{\\floatpagefraction}{0.7}\n\n\\newlength{\\@neuripsabovecaptionskip}\\setlength{\\@neuripsabovecaptionskip}{7\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\@neuripsbelowcaptionskip}\\setlength{\\@neuripsbelowcaptionskip}{\\z@}\n\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{\\@neuripsabovecaptionskip}\n\\setlength{\\belowcaptionskip}{\\@neuripsbelowcaptionskip}\n\n% swap above/belowcaptionskip lengths for tables\n\\renewenvironment{table}\n {\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{\\@neuripsbelowcaptionskip}%\n \\setlength{\\belowcaptionskip}{\\@neuripsabovecaptionskip}%\n \\@float{table}}\n {\\end@float}\n\n% footnote formatting\n\\setlength{\\footnotesep }{6.65\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\skip\\footins}{9\\p@ \\@plus 4\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\\renewcommand{\\footnoterule}{\\kern-3\\p@ \\hrule width 12pc \\kern 2.6\\p@}\n\\setcounter{footnote}{0}\n\n% paragraph formatting\n\\setlength{\\parindent}{\\z@}\n\\setlength{\\parskip }{5.5\\p@}\n\n% list formatting\n\\setlength{\\topsep }{4\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\partopsep }{1\\p@ \\@plus 0.5\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\itemsep }{2\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\parsep }{2\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\leftmargin }{3pc}\n\\setlength{\\leftmargini }{\\leftmargin}\n\\setlength{\\leftmarginii }{2em}\n\\setlength{\\leftmarginiii}{1.5em}\n\\setlength{\\leftmarginiv }{1.0em}\n\\setlength{\\leftmarginv }{0.5em}\n\\def\\@listi {\\leftmargin\\leftmargini}\n\\def\\@listii {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 2\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@\n \\parsep 1\\p@ \\@plus 0.5\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@\n \\itemsep \\parsep}\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 1\\p@ \\@plus 0.5\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\partopsep 0.5\\p@ \\@plus 0\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@\n \\itemsep \\topsep}\n\\def\\@listiv {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiv\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listv {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginv\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listvi {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginvi\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginvi\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\n% create title\n\\providecommand{\\maketitle}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\maketitle}{%\n \\par\n \\begingroup\n \\renewcommand{\\thefootnote}{\\fnsymbol{footnote}}\n % for perfect author name centering\n \\renewcommand{\\@makefnmark}{\\hbox to \\z@{$^{\\@thefnmark}$\\hss}}\n % The footnote-mark was overlapping the footnote-text,\n % added the following to fix this problem (MK)\n \\long\\def\\@makefntext##1{%\n \\parindent 1em\\noindent\n \\hbox to 1.8em{\\hss $\\m@th ^{\\@thefnmark}$}##1\n }\n \\thispagestyle{empty}\n \\@maketitle\n \\@thanks\n \\@notice\n \\endgroup\n \\let\\maketitle\\relax\n \\let\\thanks\\relax\n}\n\n% rules for title box at top of first page\n\\newcommand{\\@toptitlebar}{\n \\hrule height 4\\p@\n \\vskip 0.25in\n \\vskip -\\parskip%\n}\n\\newcommand{\\@bottomtitlebar}{\n \\vskip 0.29in\n \\vskip -\\parskip\n \\hrule height 1\\p@\n \\vskip 0.09in%\n}\n\n% create title (includes both anonymized and non-anonymized versions)\n\\providecommand{\\@maketitle}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\@maketitle}{%\n \\vbox{%\n \\hsize\\textwidth\n \\linewidth\\hsize\n \\vskip 0.1in\n \\@toptitlebar\n \\centering\n {\\LARGE\\bf \\@title\\par}\n \\@bottomtitlebar\n \\if@anonymous\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\n Anonymous Author(s) \\\\\n Affiliation \\\\\n Address \\\\\n \\texttt{email} \\\\\n \\end{tabular}%\n \\else\n \\def\\And{%\n \\end{tabular}\\hfil\\linebreak[0]\\hfil%\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\\ignorespaces%\n }\n \\def\\AND{%\n \\end{tabular}\\hfil\\linebreak[4]\\hfil%\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\\ignorespaces%\n }\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\\@author\\end{tabular}%\n \\fi\n \\vskip 0.3in \\@minus 0.1in\n }\n}\n\n% add conference notice to bottom of first page\n\\newcommand{\\ftype@noticebox}{8}\n\\newcommand{\\@notice}{%\n % give a bit of extra room back to authors on first page\n \\enlargethispage{2\\baselineskip}%\n \\@float{noticebox}[b]%\n \\footnotesize\\@noticestring%\n \\end@float%\n}\n\n% abstract styling\n\\renewenvironment{abstract}%\n{%\n \\vskip 0.075in%\n \\centerline%\n {\\large\\bf Abstract}%\n \\vspace{0.5ex}%\n \\begin{quote}%\n}\n{\n \\par%\n \\end{quote}%\n \\vskip 1ex%\n}\n\n% For the paper checklist\n\\newcommand{\\answerYes}[1][]{\\textcolor{blue}{[Yes]#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\answerNo}[1][]{\\textcolor{orange}{[No]#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\answerNA}[1][]{\\textcolor{gray}{[N/A]#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\answerTODO}[1][]{\\textcolor{red}{\\bf [TODO]}}\n\\newcommand{\\justificationTODO}[1][]{\\textcolor{red}{\\bf [TODO]}}\n\n% handle tweaks for camera-ready copy vs. submission copy\n\\if@preprint\n \\newcommand{\\@noticestring}{%\n Preprint.%\n }\n\\else\n \\if@neuripsfinal\n \\newcommand{\\@noticestring}{\n \\@trackname\n }\n \\else\n \\newcommand{\\@noticestring}{%\n Submitted to \\@neuripsordinal\\/ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear). Do not distribute.%\n }\n\n % hide the acknowledgements\n \\NewEnviron{hide}{}\n \\let\\ack\\hide\n \\let\\endack\\endhide\n\n % line numbers for submission\n \\RequirePackage{lineno}\n \\linenumbers\n\n % fix incompatibilities between lineno and amsmath, if required, by\n % transparently wrapping linenomath environments around amsmath\n % environments\n \\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\@ifpackageloaded{amsmath}{%\n \\newcommand*\\patchAmsMathEnvironmentForLineno[1]{%\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname old#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\\csname #1\\endcsname\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname oldend#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\\csname end#1\\endcsname\n \\renewenvironment{#1}%\n {\\linenomath\\csname old#1\\endcsname}%\n {\\csname oldend#1\\endcsname\\endlinenomath}%\n }%\n \\newcommand*\\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno[1]{%\n \\patchAmsMathEnvironmentForLineno{#1}%\n \\patchAmsMathEnvironmentForLineno{#1*}%\n }%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{equation}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{align}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{flalign}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{alignat}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{gather}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{multline}%\n }\n {}\n }\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\n\\endinput\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/0_abstract.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{abstract}\n Depth-of-field control is a fundamental tool in photography, yet post-capture bokeh editing from a single image remains challenging. A practical editor should handle images captured under arbitrary focus and aperture settings. Existing methods typically assume an all-in-focus input, or first recover an all-in-focus image before rendering new bokeh. Such pipelines can discard useful blur cues from the source image and propagate reconstruction artifacts into the final edit.\n % \n We introduce \\textbf{AnyBokeh}, a physics-guided framework for \\textbf{any-to-any bokeh editing}. Instead of treating source blur merely as a degradation to be removed, AnyBokeh estimates the \\textbf{source blur state} with a signed circle-of-confusion map and a disparity map. By modeling the linear relation between signed circle of confusion and disparity difference, AnyBokeh estimates a source-specific \\textbf{optical fingerprint} and transfers the source optical characteristics to the desired focus and aperture setting. A generative editor conditioned on both source and target circle-of-confusion maps then performs relative blur synthesis, enabling spatially adaptive deblurring, preservation, and defocus rendering.\n % \n To support physically supervised learning, we further construct a high-fidelity synthetic dataset with accurate depth, focus distance, and full EXIF metadata. Experiments on real-world benchmarks show that AnyBokeh achieves faithful and controllable editing across any-to-any bokeh editing, all-in-focus-to-bokeh rendering, and defocus deblurring, while avoiding all-in-focus reconstruction and test-time bokeh-level calibration commonly required by existing approaches.\n % \n The code and dataset will be available at \\url{https://github.com/itsmag11/AnyBokeh}.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/1_introduction.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Introduction}\n\nDepth-of-field (DoF) control is an essential aesthetic tool in photography, guiding visual attention and conveying scene structure through selective focus and optical defocus, commonly perceived as bokeh. The strength and spatial distribution of bokeh are governed by the image formation process: scene points away from the focal plane are projected as circles of confusion (CoC) whose size depends on aperture, focus distance, focal length, and scene depth. In practice, a large physical aperture, corresponding to a small f-number such as $f/2.0$, produces a shallow DoF and strong blur in out-of-focus regions, while a small physical aperture like $f/22.0$ increases the DoF and makes a wider depth range appear sharp. Although these optical effects can be controlled during capture, post-capture DoF manipulation from a single in-the-wild photograph remains highly challenging.\n\nThe difficulty mainly comes from two unknowns. First, the input may already contain spatially varying defocus blur: some regions are sharp, while others are mildly or severely out of focus. A practical editor must understand this source blur state to decide which regions should be sharpened, preserved, or further defocused. Second, the camera parameters that determine the absolute blur scale, such as focus distance, aperture, focal length, sensor size, and image resolution, are often incomplete or unavailable for in-the-wild images. Together, these two unknowns make any-to-any bokeh editing fundamentally different from standard bokeh rendering: the editor must infer the current blur state of the source image while also determining the target blur scale under the desired optical setting.\n\nExisting methods address these two ambiguities only partially. Many bokeh rendering methods assume an all-in-focus (AIF) input~\\cite{ignatov2020rendering,sheng2024drbokeh,Peng2022MPIB,Peng2022BokehMe,zhu2025bokehdiff,seizinger2025bokehlicious}, where the source blur state is trivial and only the target bokeh needs to be synthesized. This assumption simplifies the problem, but restricts these methods to already sharp inputs. \n% \nRecent refocusing pipelines~\\cite{Genfocus2025} relax the input constraint by first reconstructing an AIF image from an arbitrary input and then rendering new bokeh. We refer to this forced AIF reconstruction as an \\emph{AIF bottleneck}: the input is projected into a sharp intermediate representation, which removes the observable source blur pattern and makes source-specific optical cues unavailable for subsequent target bokeh synthesis. Moreover, severe defocus deblurring is inherently ambiguous and can introduce unnecessary hallucinated details or structural errors that propagate into the final edit. \n% \nIn addition, because complete optical metadata is usually unavailable, existing pipelines often require \\emph{bokeh-level calibration}~\\cite{Peng2022BokehMe,zhu2025bokehdiff,Genfocus2025}, i.e., adjusting a renderer-specific blur scale to match the desired bokeh strength, through per-image ground-truth-guided search.\n\nTo address these limitations, we propose \\textbf{AnyBokeh}, a physics-guided framework for any-to-any bokeh editing. Instead of treating source blur merely as a degradation to be removed, AnyBokeh explicitly estimates the source blur state as a signed source CoC map, together with a disparity map. By modeling the linear relation between signed CoC diameter and disparity difference, we estimate a source-specific CoC--disparity slope, which absorbs the global optical and scaling factors that map disparity differences to image-space defocus. We call this slope an \\emph{optical fingerprint}. This quantity is physically equivalent to the bokeh-level parameter $K$ used in prior rendering methods~\\cite{Peng2022BokehMe,zhu2025bokehdiff,Genfocus2025}, as both control how disparity differences are converted into CoC magnitude. In our formulation, we denote it by $\\kappa_{src}$ to emphasize that this CoC scale is estimated directly from the observed source blur state and disparity, rather than specified externally. We then transfer this optical fingerprint to the desired focus and aperture setting to obtain the target CoC map, avoiding AIF reconstruction and test-time bokeh-level calibration.\n\nAnyBokeh synthesizes the target image with a generative editor conditioned on the source image, source CoC, and target CoC. We refer to this design as \\emph{dual-CoC conditioning}: both the current and desired blur states are provided to the model, turning any-to-any bokeh editing into relative blur synthesis. This allows the editor to explicitly model the transition from source blur to target blur and perform spatially adaptive bokeh synthesis. To train the CoC and disparity estimator under accurate physical supervision, we further construct \\textbf{UnrealBokeh}, a high-fidelity synthetic dataset rendered with ground-truth depth, focus distance, aperture, and focal length.\n% \nThe contributions of AnyBokeh are summarized as follows:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item We propose a CoC-mediated optical fingerprint transfer framework for any-to-any bokeh editing. By estimating source CoC and disparity, our method extracts a source-specific CoC--disparity slope $\\kappa_{src}$ and analytically transfers it to the target focus and aperture setting, avoiding AIF reconstruction and test-time bokeh-level calibration.\n \\item We introduce dual-CoC conditioning for relative blur synthesis. By conditioning the editor on both source and target CoC, our model explicitly observes the input blur state and the desired output blur state, enabling spatially selective deblurring, preservation, and defocus synthesis.\n \\item We build a high-fidelity synthetic dataset for physically supervised CoC learning. Using Unreal Engine, we render diverse scenes with ground-truth depth, focus distance, aperture, and focal length across multiple optical configurations, enabling robust learning of source CoC and disparity estimation.\n\\end{itemize}\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/2_related_work.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Related Work}\n\\label{sec:related}\n% \\vspace{-9pt}\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Bokeh Rendering.}\nClassical depth-of-field rendering traditionally relies on physically based simulations, which produce realistic bokeh but are computationally expensive and demand complete 3D geometry~\\cite{potmesil1981lens,haeberli1990accumulation}. To improve efficiency, image-space post-filtering methods have been widely adopted~\\cite{kraus2007depth,lee2010realtime,scattering,barron2015fast,peng2021interactive}. However, they inherently struggle with depth discontinuities, causing severe color bleeding and partial occlusion artifacts~\\cite{busam2019sterefo,sheng2024drbokeh}. While subsequent approaches attempted to mitigate these issues via physical lens models, optical aberrations, or multiview and light-field synthesis~\\cite{hach2015cinematic,wu2012rendering,lee2009depth,yu2010realtime}, handling complex occlusions remains a persistent challenge. To fundamentally resolve these geometric artifacts, recent research has shifted towards layered and neural rendering paradigms.\n% \nEarly deep models and benchmarks study natural camera bokeh rendering from all-in-focus images~\\cite{ignatov2020rendering}, while later methods combine depth estimation, layered scene representations, differentiable rendering, or neural priors to improve photorealism and boundary handling. MPIB~\\cite{Peng2022MPIB} leverages multiplane images and background inpainting to address high-resolution occlusions. BokehMe~\\cite{Peng2022BokehMe} and BokehMe++~\\cite{bokehme++} combine classical filtering with neural refinement to reduce boundary artifacts. Dr.~Bokeh~\\cite{sheng2024drbokeh} introduces a differentiable occlusion-aware renderer, and Bokehlicious~\\cite{seizinger2025bokehlicious} removes the need for explicit depth estimation by learning aperture-aware attention. More recently, the generative priors of diffusion models have been leveraged to overcome the limitations of traditional neural networks. Methods like Bokeh Diffusion~\\citep{fortes2025bokehdiffusion} and Generative Photography~\\cite{Yuan_2024_GenPhoto} explicitly inject bokeh conditions into text-to-image synthesis, while BokehDiff~\\citep{zhu2025bokehdiff} adapts a one-step diffusion scheme for high-fidelity neural lens blur.\n% \nDespite significant advancements in synthesis quality and computational efficiency, these rendering-based architectures strictly demand AIF images as inputs. \n\nTo break the AIF input limitation and achieve arbitrary refocusing, recent frameworks like DiffCamera~\\citep{wang2025diffcamera} propose a DiT-based~\\cite{Peebles2023DiT} framework trained on large-scale simulated depth-of-field image pairs. It introduces a physics-inspired stacking constraint and a depth dropout mechanism to enable flexible control over arbitrary focal points and bokeh levels. However, we argue that their method may establish potential exposure bias, such that the defocus maps used in bokeh-to-clear rendering are from clear images, leading to information leak. Genfocus~\\cite{Genfocus2025}, on the other hand, adopts a cascaded two-stage pipeline. It first employs a DeblurNet to force the recovery of an AIF image from an arbitrary input, and subsequently utilizes a BokehNet trained via semi-supervised learning on both synthetic and real-world data to render the target bokeh with controllable focus and blur intensity. However, by strictly decoupling the process into isolated deblurring and re-blurring stages, Genfocus prematurely discards the original optical context and introduces unnecessary hallucination.\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Defocus Deblurring}\n% \nThe core objective of defocus deblurring is to recover a sharp AIF image from inputs degraded by spatially varying depth-of-field blur. Unlike uniform motion blur, defocus blur is tightly coupled with scene depth and camera aperture, and its magnitude can change abruptly across depth discontinuities and occlusion boundaries. Early methods typically formulated the problem as spatially varying deconvolution with estimated defocus maps or blur kernels~\\cite{bando2007towards,zhu2013estimating}, but such pipelines are sensitive to inaccurate blur estimation and often introduce artifacts around complex depth transitions. \n% \nRecent learning-based methods improve robustness by introducing stronger image priors and defocus-specific cues. Some methods exploit dual-pixel~\\citep{abuolaim2020defocus, pan2021dual} or quad-pixel~\\cite{chen2025quadpixel} sensors to obtain aperture-dependent sub-view information, while others model defocus through adaptive filters~\\cite{Lee2021IFAN}, disparity-aware kernels~\\cite{yang2023k3dn}, or implicit inverse kernels~\\cite{quan2023single,tang2024prior}. These works show that effective defocus deblurring requires not only generic image restoration capacity, but also an understanding of the relationship between blur magnitude and scene geometry.\n% \nFollowing this observation, we compare against two representative baselines. DRBNet~\\citep{ruan2022drbnet} learns the deblurring mapping by jointly leveraging light-field-generated bokeh and real defocus images. However, when applied to highly challenging, in-the-wild photographs with severe blur, it frequently fails to recover the underlying geometric structures, leading to significant structural distortions in the output. Conversely, Restormer~\\citep{Zamir2021Restormer} is a highly efficient Transformer architecture tailored for high-resolution image restoration. Despite its strong general performance in denoising and deblurring, its inherently regressive objective struggles with the severely ill-posed nature of extreme defocus, often yielding overly smoothed, averaged textures rather than authentic high-frequency details. Furthermore, it is prone to introducing unnatural artifacts in background regions with complex depth variations.\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/3_methodology.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Methodology}\n\\label{sec:method}\n\n\\subsection{Preliminary}\n\\label{sec:background}\n\n\\textbf{Circle-of-Confusion.}\nUnder the thin-lens model with a circular aperture, a scene point away from the focal plane is imaged as a defocus disk, commonly referred to as the circle of confusion (CoC). Let $N$ denote the f-number, $f$ the focal length, $S_1$ the focus distance, and $S_2$ the scene-point distance. All distances are measured in millimeters, while $N$ is dimensionless. The signed physical CoC diameter is given by\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n CoC^{mm} = \\frac{f^2}{N(S_1 - f)} \\frac{(S_2 - S_1)}{S_2}\\,,\n \\label{equ:1}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nThe sign indicates whether the scene point lies in front of or behind the focal plane, while the magnitude gives the blur diameter. Throughout the paper, we use $CoC$ to denote signed CoC diameter unless otherwise specified.\n\nTo express the CoC in image pixels ($px$), the physical blur diameter is converted according to the sensor size and image resolution:\n\\begin{equation}\n CoC^{px} = CoC^{mm} \\cdot \\frac{W_{res}}{W_{sensor}}\\,,\n \\label{equ:2}\n\\end{equation} \n%\nwhere $W_{res}$ is the image width in $px$ and $W_{sensor}$ is the physical sensor width in $mm$. Note that any image resizing changes the CoC magnitude in pixel units.\n% \nIn our Unreal Engine~\\cite{unrealengine} synthetic dataset (Sec.~\\ref{sec:unrealbokeh}), the per-pixel scene depth, focus distance, focal length, f-number, sensor size, and image resolution are all available. We therefore compute dense ground-truth signed CoC maps paired with each rendered RGB image, providing direct supervision for learning CoC estimation.\n\n\\textbf{Optical Fingerprint.}\nEq.~\\ref{equ:1} shows that the CoC is determined by both scene geometry and camera optics. In typical non-macro photography, the focus distance is much larger than the focal length, i.e., $S1 \\gg f$. Thus, $S_1 - f \\approx S_1$, and the signed CoC in physical unit can be approximated as\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{split}\n CoC^{mm} & \\approx \\frac{f^2}{N \\cdot S_1} \\frac{(S_2 - S_1)}{S_2} = \\frac{f^2}{N}\\cdot(\\frac{1}{S_1}-\\frac{1}{S_2})\\,,\n \\label{equ:3}\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nLet $D = 1/S_2$ denote the disparity of a scene point and $D_{focus} = 1/S_1$ denote the focus disparity. Substituting the above approximation into Eq.~\\ref{equ:2}, the pixel-space CoC becomes\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n CoC^{px} = \\underbrace{\n \\left(\n \\frac{f^2 \\cdot W_{res}}{N \\cdot W_{sensor}}\n \\right)\n }_{\\kappa}\n \\cdot (D_{focus} - D) \\,.\n\\label{equ:slope}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nThis formulation reveals a linear relationship between signed CoC and disparity difference, where the slope $\\kappa$ is shared by all pixels of the same source image. Therefore, even when EXIF metadata is unavailable or incomplete, the slope of this relationship can be estimated from the predicted source CoC and disparity. It absorbs the global factors that determine the CoC scale, including aperture, focal length, sensor size, image resolution, and the scale convention of the estimated disparity. We refer to this source-specific slope as the \\textit{optical fingerprint}, since it characterizes how the camera configuration and depth representation convert disparity differences into image-space defocus.\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/framework.pdf}\n \\caption{Overview of the AnyBokeh framework. (1) Stage~1 predicts the signed source CoC map $CoC_{src}$ and disparity map $D$ from the source image to recover the source blur state and geometry. (2) The target CoC is analytically computed by transferring the source optical fingerprint $\\kappa_{src}$ to the desired focus and aperture setting. (3) Stage~2 performs CoC-conditioned bokeh editing using the source image, $CoC_{src}$, and $CoC_{tgt}$ to synthesize the final target image.}\n \\label{fig:framework}\n % \\vspace{-4mm}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Stage 1: CoC and Disparity Estimation}\n\\label{sec:stage1}\n\nStage~1 of our method estimates the source blur state and geometry from a single input image. Given the source image $I_{src}$, it jointly predicts two dense maps: the signed source CoC map $CoC_{src}$ and the disparity map $D$. The source CoC describes the defocus already present in the input image, while disparity provides the geometric coordinate needed to transfer the optical fingerprint to a new focus setting. Predicting these two quantities together encourages the model to reason about defocus and geometry in a coupled manner: $CoC_{src}$ provides direct evidence of the observed blur state, while $D$ explains the scene geometry underlying that blur. \n\nEstimating $CoC_{src}$ and $D$ from defocused inputs is inherently ambiguous, especially around depth discontinuities and severely blurred structures where high-frequency evidence has been weakened. We therefore rely on a generative prediction model with a strong image prior, which can infer plausible scene boundaries and coherent geometry from degraded visual clues. This prior is particularly useful for producing sharp and spatially consistent dense maps, rather than overly smooth estimates that would lead to inaccurate CoC--disparity slopes. The CoC map is normalized as detailed in Sec.~\\ref{sec:exp}.\n\nWe predict $CoC_{src}$ and $D$ on the full resized image rather than using tiled inference. This is important because disparity is defined up to a global scale convention, and independently predicting different tiles may lead to inconsistent disparity scales or discontinuities across tile boundaries. Such inconsistencies would directly affect the estimated CoC--disparity slope and therefore the optical fingerprint. Instead, Stage~1 predicts globally consistent low-resolution maps from the complete image context, which are then de-padded and upsampled to the original resolution.\n% \nThis formulation is agnostic to the unknown camera metadata or prior image transformations of an in-the-wild photo. Stage~1 does not require knowing how the image was captured or resized before being observed. It simply estimates the signed CoC diameter visible on the current input canvas. As a result, the predicted $CoC_{src}$ and $D$ provide a consistent basis for estimating the source optical fingerprint. The framework of Stage~1 is shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:framework}~(1).\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Target CoC Calculation.}\nGiven the source CoC and disparity from Stage~1, our goal is to construct a target CoC map that specifies the desired blur state for Stage~2. We primarily consider the relative editing setting, where the source image provides observable defocus cues and the user specifies the desired change in focus and aperture. This setting is suitable for in-the-wild bokeh editing, since complete EXIF metadata is often unavailable, but the source blur pattern still carries information about the underlying optical scale. \n\nAs derived in Eq.~\\ref{equ:slope}, the signed CoC is approximately linear with respect to the disparity difference $(D_{focus}^{src} - D)$. $D_{focus}^{src}$ can be directly obtained as the disparity at $CoC_{src}=0$. For a given source image, the slope $\\kappa_{src}$ captures the source-specific CoC scale and serves as the optical fingerprint that both source and target images share. Once $\\kappa_{src}$ is estimated from the predicted $CoC_{src}$ and $D$, we transfer it to the target setting by scaling it according to the desired aperture change. Let $r_a$ denote the aperture ratio from the source to the target setting, e.g., $r_a = N_{src} / N_{tgt}$ when the focal length and sensor scale are fixed. The target CoC--disparity slope and target CoC are computed as\n\\begin{equation}\n \\kappa_{tgt} = r_a \\kappa_{src}\\,, \\qquad\n CoC_{tgt} = \\kappa_{tgt}\\left(D^{tgt}_{focus} - D\\right)\\,,\n\\label{equ:target_coc}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $D^{tgt}_{focus}$ is the user-specified target focus disparity. An illustration can be found in Fig.~\\ref{fig:framework}~(2). This formulation transfers the optical scale observed in the source image to the desired focus and aperture setting without requiring complete camera metadata. Unlike previous methods~\\cite{Peng2022BokehMe, zhu2025bokehdiff,Genfocus2025}, the target CoC is obtained directly from the source optical fingerprint and user control, avoiding test-time bokeh-level calibration. Moreover, since the target CoC is derived by scaling the source optical fingerprint, the predicted blur strength remains consistent with the defocus scale observed in the input image, rather than being determined by an independently searched parameter.\n\nThe proposed AnyBokeh also supports absolute CoC control by directly specifying $\\kappa_{abs}$, which recovers the standard bokeh rendering form:\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n CoC_{tgt} = \\kappa_{abs} \\left(D^{tgt}_{focus} - D\\right).\n\\end{equation}\n% \nThis setting is consistent with conventional bokeh rendering pipelines, which synthesize target defocus from an AIF input using an externally specified blur strength. \nSince such methods do not preserve or estimate the source optical fingerprint, absolute control is their primary way to determine the target CoC scale, often requiring manual tuning or test-time search in practice. \n% \nIn contrast, AnyBokeh uses absolute control only as an optional interface, e.g., when users want to impose a specific absolute target blur scale or when the source defocus cues are too weak to yield a reliable fingerprint. However, an ideal all-in-focus image with exactly zero CoC is rare in practice, and the predicted source CoC typically provides a usable, though sometimes weak, slope for relative transfer.\n\n\n\\subsection{Stage 2: CoC-Conditioned Bokeh Editing}\n\nGiven the source image $I_{src}$, $CoC_{src}$, and $CoC_{tgt}$, Stage~2 learns the mapping $(I_{src}, CoC_{src}, CoC_{tgt}) \\rightarrow I_{tgt}$. Unlike conventional AIF-to-bokeh rendering~\\cite{ignatov2020rendering,sheng2024drbokeh,Peng2022MPIB,Peng2022BokehMe,zhu2025bokehdiff,seizinger2025bokehlicious}, our setting handles inputs that may already contain defocus blur. Therefore, the model needs to determine not only where to add blur, but also where to preserve existing content or recover sharper structures.\n% \nTo this end, we use \\emph{dual-CoC conditioning}: both $CoC_{src}$ and $CoC_{tgt}$ are provided to the editor as explicit blur-state guidance. The source CoC describes the blur already present in the input image, while the target CoC specifies the desired blur distribution after editing. Together, they define a relative blur transition, allowing the editor to reason about whether each region should be deblurred, preserved, or further defocused. Both CoC maps are normalized as detailed in Sec.~\\ref{sec:exp}.\n% \nThis design is important for any-to-any editing because the target CoC alone does not reveal the source blur state. If $CoC_{src}$ is omitted, the model must infer the existing defocus solely from image appearance, which is ambiguous and can lead to inaccurate bokeh synthesis (see Sec.~\\ref{sec:ablation}).\n% \nCombined with the target CoC calculation in Sec.~\\ref{sec:stage1}, Stage~2 completes the any-to-any editing pipeline by turning the transferred optical fingerprint into the final refocused image. The framework is shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:framework}~(3).\n\n\\subsection{UnrealBokeh Synthetic Dataset}\n\\label{sec:unrealbokeh}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/ub.pdf}\n % \\vspace{-7mm}\n \\caption{Samples from UnrealBokeh. For the same (environment, camera, focal length) scene, images with various apertures and focus distances are captured. Sharp ground truth CoC maps derived from accurate depth maps are provided, as demonstrated in the bottom left corner of each image.}\n \\label{fig:ub}\n\\end{figure}\n\nTraining Stage~1 requires dense supervision for both source CoC and disparity estimation. Accurate CoC supervision depends not only on scene depth, but also on optical parameters such as focus distance, focal length, aperture, sensor size, and image resolution. Such annotations are difficult to obtain from real photographs, especially for in-the-wild images where complete metadata, depth, and focus annotations are typically unavailable.\n% \nExisting bokeh datasets are not sufficient for this purpose. Real datasets such as EBB!~\\cite{ignatov2020rendering} and RealBokeh~\\cite{seizinger2025bokehlicious} provide paired images captured under different camera settings, but do not include the dense geometry and complete optical metadata needed to compute ground-truth CoC maps. Synthetic datasets generated by classical ray-tracing~\\cite{Peng2022BokehMe,zhu2025bokehdiff} provide scalable training data, but often rely on simplified layer-based geometry that cannot fully represent complex scene depth.\n\nTo enable physically supervised CoC learning, we construct \\textbf{UnrealBokeh}, a high-fidelity synthetic dataset rendered in Unreal Engine~\\cite{unrealengine}. For each image, we record RGB, dense depth, focus distance, aperture, focal length, sensor size, and image resolution, allowing us to compute dense signed CoC maps from the thin-lens model. Sample images with corresponding CoC maps from UnrealBokeh are shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:ub}. We render diverse indoor and outdoor scenes under controlled optical variations and form source--target editing pairs by varying focus distance and aperture while keeping scene geometry and camera viewpoint fixed. The resulting dataset contains 11{,}477 images and 382{,}888 editing pairs. Comparisons with existing datasets are listed in Tab.~\\ref{tab:dataset_comparison}. We split the data by environment--camera group to avoid scene and viewpoint leakage across training and validation. UnrealBokeh provides physically grounded supervision for Stage~1 and aligned source--target pairs for training Stage~2. Additional dataset construction details are provided below.\n\n\\textbf{Scene Collection.}\nUnrealBokeh is rendered using Unreal Engine with diverse indoor and outdoor 3D scenes. We download 3D environments from the Fab marketplace of Unreal Engine~\\citep{unrealengine} and obtain authentication from the authors for photo rendering in their 3D assets for image-level research use. These environments provide realistic geometry, materials, and lighting, enabling more faithful optical supervision than simplified layer-based synthetic data.\n\n\\textbf{Rendering Setup.}\nWe instantiate 71 unique camera setups across the collected environments. For each camera setup, we render images under multiple focal lengths selected from $\\{11, 24, 35, 55, 85, 135\\}$ mm with a small random perturbation of $\\pm 10$ mm. For each focal length, we vary the f-number from $f/1.4$ to $f/22.0$ and render images with different focus distances. For every rendered image, we store the RGB image, dense depth map, focus distance, aperture, focal length, sensor size, and image resolution.\n\n\\textbf{Ground-truth CoC Computation.}\nUsing the stored depth and camera parameters, we compute dense signed CoC maps following the thin-lens formulation in Sec.~\\ref{sec:background}. The sign of CoC indicates whether a scene point lies in front of or behind the focal plane, and the magnitude denotes the image-space blur diameter. These dense signed CoC maps provide direct supervision for Stage~1 source CoC prediction.\n\n\\textbf{Pair Construction.}\nTo construct source--target editing pairs, we group rendered images by environment, camera, and focal length. Within each group, images share the same scene geometry and viewpoint but differ in focus distance and aperture. We pair images from the same group to form aligned bokeh editing pair examples. Pairs with overly similar source and target appearances are removed to improve training diversity. This process results in 11{,}477 rendered images and 382{,}888 unique source--target editing pairs.\n\n\\textbf{Data Split.}\nWe split UnrealBokeh into training and validation sets by environment--camera group, resulting in 340{,}796 editing pairs in the train set and 42{,}092 pairs in the validation. This ensures that images from the same scene and viewpoint do not appear across different splits, preventing leakage between training and validation. \nWe use UnrealBokeh to train Stage~1 with physically accurate CoC and disparity supervision, and to train Stage~2 with aligned source--target editing pairs.\n\n\\begin{table}[htbp!]\n \\centering\n % \\footnotesize\n \\caption{Dataset comparison. UnrealBokeh provides complete optical supervision and dense geometry, enabling ground-truth CoC computation for Stage~1 training. \n *Actual downloadable resolution of RealBokeh is different from $6000{\\times}4000$ stated in the paper~\\cite{seizinger2025bokehlicious}.\n }\n \\label{tab:dataset_comparison}\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{5pt}\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{0.95}\n \\begin{tabular}{lccc}\n \\toprule\n Dataset & \\textbf{UnrealBokeh} & RealBokeh~\\cite{seizinger2025bokehlicious} & EBB!~\\cite{ignatov2020rendering} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\# Images & 11,477 & 27,451 & 9,774 \\\\\n \\# Editing Pairs & 382,888 & 224,750 & 9,774 \\\\\n Resolution & $2016{\\times}1120$ & $2000{\\times}1500$* & $\\approx1550{\\times}1024$ \\\\\n Aperture Range & $f/22$--$f/1.4$ & $f/20$--$f/2$ & $f/16$,$f/1.8$ \\\\\n \\midrule\n Multiple Focus Distances & \\cmark & \\xmark & \\xmark \\\\\n Complete EXIF Metadata & \\cmark & \\xmark & \\xmark \\\\\n Dense GT Depth & \\cmark & \\xmark & \\xmark \\\\\n Computable Dense GT CoC & \\cmark & \\xmark & \\xmark \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n % \\vspace{-17pt}\n\\end{table}\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/4_experiments.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Experiments}\n\\label{sec:exp}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\linewidth]{figures/stage1.pdf}\n \\caption{Qualitative Stage~1 predictions on EBB! and RealBokeh. Each row shows the same scene under two aperture settings, with stronger defocus on the left and weaker defocus on the right. Stage~1 predicts larger CoC magnitudes for stronger bokeh while producing consistent disparity maps across aperture changes, indicating that it can separate source blur state from scene geometry.}\n \\label{fig:stage1}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/any2any.pdf}\n % \\vspace{-5mm}\n \\caption{Qualitative comparison on any-to-any bokeh editing. Aperture values are shown for the input and ground-truth target images. The top row of each dataset shows bokeh removal, and the bottom row shows bokeh enhancement. Compared with deblur-then-render baselines, AnyBokeh performs spatially appropriate deblurring or defocus synthesis more effectively, adjusting bokeh balls faithfully by enlarging or shrinking them according to the aperture changes.}\n \\label{fig:any2any}\n % \\vspace{-5mm}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\textbf{Implementation Details.}\nFor both Stage~1 and Stage~2, we use FLUX.1-Fill-dev\\footnote{black-forest-labs/FLUX.1-Fill-dev}~\\cite{flux2024} as the generative backbone and fine-tune it with LoRA~\\citep{hu2022lora}. We set the LoRA rank to 32 and train each stage for approximately 30K iterations with a per-GPU batch size of 1. Learning rate is fixed at $1e-4$ with AdamW optimizer~\\cite{loshchilov2018adamw}. Training of both stages is done on 4 NVIDIA A100 80 GB GPUs. Offset noise is applied during fine-tuning of both stages.\n\nFor Stage~1, we first resize the longer side of the source image to the model input resolution and apply reflection padding to obtain a square input. The raw CoC map is normalized to $[0,1]$ by logarithmic normalization. We formulate the prediction as an inpainting task on a horizontal triptych canvas, where the left panel contains the source image $I_{src}$, the middle panel corresponds to the source CoC map $CoC_{src}$, and the right panel corresponds to the disparity map $D$. During inference, the source image panel is kept visible, while the CoC and disparity panels are masked as the inpainting regions, as illustrated in Fig.~\\ref{fig:framework}. \nThe model then fills the two masked panels to produce image-like predictions of $CoC_{src}$ and $D$.\n% \nAfter prediction, we extract the CoC and disparity panels, remove the padding, and upsample both maps back to the original image resolution. Since CoC is defined as an image-space blur diameter in pixels, its magnitude must be rescaled consistently with the image resizing factor. Specifically, if the source image is resized by a factor $s$ before Stage~1 prediction, the recovered CoC map is scaled by $1/s$ when mapped back to the original resolution. The CoC map is also denormalized to its original raw value range. The disparity map is spatially resized, but its values are left unchanged, since it serves as a relative geometric coordinate. Target CoC is calculated in raw value range.\n\nFor Stage~2, we use signed $\\tanh$ normalization for $CoC_{src}$ and $CoC_{tgt}$ to represent arbitrary raw CoC values in a bounded image-like form. The input is arranged as a $2\\times2$ grid as shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:framework}: the top-left cell contains $CoC_{src}$, the top-right cell contains the source image $I_{src}$, the bottom-left cell contains $CoC_{tgt}$, and the bottom-right cell is the target image slot $I_{tgt}$. During training, we sample aligned image patches and construct one such grid for each patch. The target image slot is masked, and the model learns to synthesize $I_{tgt}$ conditioned on the other three cells. During inference, we apply the same grid formulation to overlapping tiles of the full-resolution image. The predicted target tiles are merged using Hann-windowed overlap-add stitching with a window overlap of $0.2$, preserving the original resolution and aspect ratio.\n\n\\textbf{CoC Map Normalization.}\nWe use different CoC normalization strategies for Stage~1 and Stage~2 since CoC plays different roles in the two stages. In Stage~1, CoC is a regression target and must be predicted accurately. In Stage~2, CoC is used as a conditioning signal for image generation and mainly needs to provide stable blur-state guidance.\n\nFor Stage~1, directly regressing raw pixel-space CoC values is suboptimal because CoC maps have a large dynamic range. Large out-of-focus regions can dominate the regression target, while small CoC errors near the focal plane are often more important for refocusing control, since they can shift the perceived focus boundary. We therefore use a signed logarithmic normalization:\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n CoC_{signed}^{log}\n =\n \\operatorname{sign}(CoC)\n \\frac{\n \\log(1 + |CoC|)\n }{\n \\log(1 + CoC_{max})\n },\n \\qquad\n CoC_{norm}^{log}\n =\n \\operatorname{clip}\n \\left(\n \\frac{CoC_{signed}^{log} + 1}{2},\n 0, 1\n \\right).\n\\end{equation}\n\nThis transformation maps the raw CoC range $[-CoC_{max}, CoC_{max}]$ to $[0,1]$, with zero CoC mapped to $0.5$. It allocates more representational value range to near-focus regions, where accurate CoC prediction is most critical, while still preserving distinctions among large CoC values. This is important for Stage~1 because the model is explicitly supervised to predict CoC values, and over-saturating large CoC regions would weaken the learning signal for heavily defocused areas. \n\nFor Stage~2, CoC maps are not regression targets but conditioning inputs. The editor only needs them to describe the source and target blur states in a stable and bounded form. We therefore use a signed $\\tanh$ normalization:\n% \n\\begin{equation}\n CoC_{signed}^{tanh}\n =\n \\tanh\n \\left(\n \\frac{CoC}{S}\n \\right),\n \\qquad\n CoC_{norm}^{tanh}\n =\n \\frac{CoC_{signed}^{tanh} + 1}{2}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nwhere $S$ controls the saturation scale and is set as $S=0.1\\times\\max(H,W)$. This maps raw CoC values from $(-\\infty,\\infty)$ to a bounded range $[0,1]$ while preserving the CoC sign. Unlike Stage~1, saturation is acceptable here because CoC is used as guidance rather than a supervised output. The bounded representation improves numerical stability and allows the editor to handle arbitrary target CoC magnitudes, while still preserving sufficient information for the model to distinguish relative blur states.\n\nWe avoid using a $\\tanh$ normalization for Stage~1 regression because it quickly saturates for large raw CoC values. Once saturated, different large CoC magnitudes become nearly indistinguishable in the normalized space, giving the model little incentive to predict large blur values accurately. This can lead to systematically underestimated CoC in strongly defocused regions.\n\n\n\n\\textbf{Evaluation Setup.}\nWe evaluate AnyBokeh under three settings: any-to-any bokeh editing, AIF-to-bokeh rendering, and defocus deblurring (bokeh-to-AIF). In the any-to-any setting, the source and target images are captured from the same scene and viewpoint but under different focus distances and aperture values; the source image may therefore already contain spatially varying defocus. In the AIF-to-bokeh setting, the source image is all-in-focus, and the target image contains stronger defocus, corresponding to the conventional bokeh rendering task. In the defocus deblurring setting, the source image is defocused, and the target image is all-in-focus. \nFollowing prior bokeh rendering methods~\\citep{Peng2022BokehMe,zhu2025bokehdiff,seizinger2025bokehlicious,Genfocus2025}, we use LPIPS~\\citep{lpips} and DISTS~\\citep{dists} to measure reference-based perceptual similarity, and FID~\\cite{fid} for distribution-level realism.\n\n\\textbf{Datasets.}\nAlthough AnyBokeh is trained only on the synthetic UnrealBokeh dataset, we evaluate it on real-world bokeh datasets to assess zero-shot generalization. We use EBB!~\\cite{ignatov2020rendering} and RealBokeh~\\cite{seizinger2025bokehlicious} following \\cite{Peng2022BokehMe,zhu2025bokehdiff,seizinger2025bokehlicious}. For EBB!, we use the Val294 split and construct evaluation pairs for all three tasks. For RealBokeh, we randomly sampled 300 pairs from the entire test set for any-to-any evaluation. For both AIF-to-bokeh and bokeh-to-AIF tasks, we use valid pairs from the first 50 test IDs. For all settings, source--target pairs are selected from the same scene and viewpoint to ensure that the evaluation focuses on blur editing rather than geometric misalignment.\n\n\\textbf{Baselines.} \nWe compare AnyBokeh with representative open-source methods for bokeh rendering and defocus deblurring. For bokeh rendering from AIF inputs, we evaluate BokehMe~\\citep{Peng2022BokehMe} and BokehDiff~\\citep{zhu2025bokehdiff}, as both methods provide controllable defocus synthesis from AIF images and are trained with synthetic bokeh supervision. Depth maps required by both methods are generated by Depth-Pro~\\cite{depthpro}. Focus points estimated by foreground masks~\\cite{zheng2024birefnet} or edge difference are shared by all methods, including ours.\n% \nFor defocus deblurring, we implement Restormer~\\citep{Zamir2021Restormer} with its single-image defocus deblurring weights for the specific task, and DRBNet~\\citep{ruan2022drbnet}. \n% \nSince existing bokeh rendering methods do not natively support arbitrary defocused inputs, we construct deblur-then-render baselines for any-to-any editing by pairing an AIF estimator with a bokeh module. The AIF estimator first predicts an all-in-focus image from the source input, and the bokeh module then renders the target defocus effect. This evaluation protocol represents the natural way to extend AIF-based bokeh rendering methods to any-to-any editing, and directly contrasts with AnyBokeh's CoC-conditioned relative editing formulation. We exclude Genfocus~\\cite{Genfocus2025} from quantitative comparison because its released weights are trained on our evaluation benchmarks, and its training code is unavailable. Using the released model would make the pure zero-shot comparison unfair, while retraining it using our synthetic dataset is not feasible. We therefore discuss it only qualitatively in the related work.\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n \\small\n \\centering\n \\caption{Quantitative comparison on any-to-any bokeh editing. Existing bokeh rendering methods cannot directly handle defocused inputs, so we evaluate them with deblur-then-render pipelines. Bokeh Calibration required by baselines is described in Sec.~\\ref{sec:any2any}.\n Best results are marked in \\colorbox{cyan!20}{\\textbf{bold}}.}\n \\hspace{0.5pt}\n \\label{tab:any2any}\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3.6pt}\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.0}\n \\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{\n \\begin{tabular}{llccccc ccc}\n \\toprule\n \\multirow{2.7}{*}{AIF Estimator} & \\multirow{2.7}{*}{Bokeh Module} \n & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{Editing Protocol} \n & \\multicolumn{3}{c}{EBB!} & \\multicolumn{3}{c}{RealBokeh} \\\\\n \\cmidrule(lr){3-4}\\cmidrule(lr){5-7}\\cmidrule(lr){8-10}\n & & Direct Edit & No Calib. & LPIPS$\\downarrow$ & DISTS$\\downarrow$ & FID$\\downarrow$ & LPIPS$\\downarrow$ & DISTS$\\downarrow$ & FID$\\downarrow$ \\\\\n \\midrule\n Restormer & BokehMe & \\xmark & \\xmark & 0.4451 & 0.2634 & 38.2801 & 0.3190 & 0.1399 & 48.2732 \\\\\n Restormer & BokehDiff & \\xmark & \\xmark & 0.4449 & 0.2663 & 42.5686 & 0.3360 & 0.1505 & 61.6716 \\\\\n DRBNet & BokehMe & \\xmark & \\xmark & 0.4424 & 0.2588 & 36.8142 & 0.3211 & 0.1415 & 48.6855 \\\\\n DRBNet & BokehDiff & \\xmark & \\xmark & 0.4444 & 0.2634 & 42.1294 & 0.3424 & 0.1557 & 63.3783 \\\\\n \\midrule\n -- & \\textbf{AnyBokeh (Ours)} & \\cmark & \\cmark & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{0.4010} & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{0.1426} & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{24.6042} & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{0.3033} & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{0.0944} & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{33.6655} \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}}\n % \\vspace{-5mm}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\n\n\n\n\\subsection{Source CoC and Disparity Map Estimation}\n\\label{app:stage1qual}\n\nFig.~\\ref{fig:stage1} shows qualitative predictions of the Stage~1 estimator on EBB! and RealBokeh images. Each row contains the same scene captured with different aperture settings: the left example has a smaller f-number and stronger defocus, while the right example has a larger f-number and weaker defocus. The predicted CoC maps correctly reflect this change in bokeh strength. Specifically, inputs with stronger defocus produce larger CoC magnitudes, whereas inputs with weaker defocus yield CoC values closer to the focus value of $0.5$ in the normalized visualization. Here, $0.5$ denotes zero raw CoC, while values close to $0$ or $1$ indicate large signed defocus (as described in Sec.~\\ref{sec:exp}).\n\nThe predicted disparity maps remain largely consistent across different aperture settings of the same scene, since scene geometry should be independent of the amount of optical blur. This consistency suggests that Stage~1 learns to separate geometric structure from defocus magnitude, which is essential for estimating a reliable optical fingerprint. Some ambiguity remains in regions where severe defocus removes most geometric evidence, such as background leaves in the third row, but the overall scene layout and major depth discontinuities are still recovered. These results demonstrate that Stage~1 can effectively infer both source CoC and disparity from inputs with varying bokeh levels, providing stable guidance for subsequent target CoC computation and CoC-conditioned editing.\n\n\n\n\\subsection{Any-to-Any Bokeh Editing}\n\\label{sec:any2any}\n\nAny-to-any bokeh editing is the main setting of our work. As discussed above, existing AIF-to-bokeh rendering methods cannot be directly applied to defocused inputs, so we evaluate them through deblur-then-render pipelines by pairing an AIF estimator with a bokeh renderer. A remaining challenge is how to set the bokeh-level parameter used by the renderer. Since these pipelines do not estimate a source-specific optical fingerprint, their target blur scale must be provided externally.\n% \nA common strategy in prior work is to perform per-image search over the bokeh-level parameter $K$ using the ground-truth target image as guidance~\\cite{Peng2022BokehMe,zhu2025bokehdiff,Genfocus2025}. However, such target-guided search is unavailable in blind post-capture editing and would make the comparison overly optimistic. Instead, we estimate a metadata-derived pseudo CoC-diameter scale following Bokeh Diffusion~\\cite{fortes2025bokehdiffusion}:\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n K_{pseudo} \\approx \\frac{f^2 S_1}{N(S_1 - f)} \\cdot \\frac{W_{res}}{W_{sensor}}\\,,\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhere the notation follows Sec.~\\ref{sec:background}. In practice, $K_{pseudo}$ may still differ from the effective bokeh-level parameter required by each renderer due to inaccurate depth estimation, missing or imprecise metadata, image resizing, and renderer-specific blur conventions. We therefore introduce a single global calibration scale $\\gamma$ and set\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n K_{calib} = \\gamma K_{pseudo}\\,.\n\\end{equation}\n%\n$K_{calib}$ corresponds to the bokeh-level parameter that prior methods search for. For each method--dataset combination, we search per-image $\\gamma$ once on a subset of 100 sampled image pairs and then fix the average as the optimal global scale for all test images. This protocol avoids per-image target-guided search while still allowing each baseline to use a reasonable global bokeh-level calibration.\n\nAnyBokeh does not require this calibration. Its target CoC is computed by transferring the source optical fingerprint estimated from $CoC_{src}$ and $D$ (visual examples shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:stage1}), so the target blur scale is derived from the input image and the user-specified focus/aperture change. As shown in Tab.~\\ref{tab:any2any}, AnyBokeh outperforms the deblur-then-render baselines across both EBB! and RealBokeh. These results suggest that directly modeling the source and target blur states is more effective than first converting the input into an AIF image. Moreover, AnyBokeh achieves this without any test-time bokeh-level calibration, demonstrating the benefit of CoC-mediated optical fingerprint transfer for blind any-to-any editing. Visual results are showcased in Fig.~\\ref{fig:any2any} and \\ref{fig:demo}.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\linewidth]{figures/demo.pdf}\n \\caption{Qualitative results for arbitrary aperture and focus changes. Given a single input image, AnyBokeh supports user-specified aperture rendering and focus relocation without ground-truth target images. In aperture-control examples, the focus point is fixed (marked in the input), and the target f-number is varied. In focus-control examples, the aperture is fixed, and the focus point is moved to different scene locations (marked in each result image), causing the sharp region to shift accordingly.}\n \\label{fig:demo}\n % \\vspace{-12mm}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\textbf{Arbitrary Aperture and Focus Changes.}\nWe further demonstrate the controllability of AnyBokeh under user-specified aperture and focus changes. Unlike paired benchmark evaluation, this setting does not have ground-truth target images, since the requested focus point and aperture value may correspond to a capture configuration that was never observed. We therefore provide qualitative examples to illustrate whether the model can respond to arbitrary user controls from a single input image.\n% \nFig.~\\ref{fig:demo} shows two types of edits. In the aperture-control examples, the focus point is kept fixed while the target aperture is varied. AnyBokeh consistently weakens or strengthens the defocus effect according to the specified aperture, even with existing bokeh in the input. In the focus-control examples, the aperture is kept fixed while the target focus point is moved to different scene locations. The model correspondingly shifts the sharp region to the selected focus point and adjusts foreground/background blur in a spatially coherent manner.\n\nThese examples show that AnyBokeh is not limited to reconstructing predefined source--target pairs. By combining the predicted source CoC and disparity with user-specified focus and aperture controls, our method can synthesize diverse post-capture bokeh edits from arbitrary inputs, supporting both aperture adjustment and focus relocation in a unified framework.\n\n\n\\subsection{Bokeh Rendering from AIF Inputs}\n\nWe further evaluate the conventional AIF-to-bokeh rendering setting to test whether AnyBokeh remains effective when the source blur signal is weak. For BokehMe and BokehDiff, we use the same global bokeh-level calibration protocol as in Sec.~\\ref{sec:any2any}. For AnyBokeh, we run the full pipeline and compute the target CoC using relative optical fingerprint transfer. \n% \nAs shown in Tab.~\\ref{tab:bokeh_rendering}, AnyBokeh achieves the best performance across all metrics on both datasets. This shows that, although AnyBokeh is designed for the more general any-to-any setting, it also performs strongly under the standard AIF-to-bokeh task. The results further indicate that the predicted source CoC and disparity provide sufficient guidance for relative target CoC computation even when the input is near all-in-focus. The second and fourth rows of Fig.~\\ref{fig:any2any} showcase AIF-to-bokeh examples.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n \\centering\n \\footnotesize\n % \\vspace{-2mm}\n \\caption{Bokeh rendering from all-in-focus inputs. \n % We evaluate the AIF-to-bokeh setting on EBB! and RealBokeh. \n The same bokeh-level calibration protocol as the any-to-any setting is applied. AnyBokeh uses the full Stage~1+Stage~2 pipeline with relative target CoC transfer and requires no bokeh-level calibration. Best results are marked in \\colorbox{cyan!20}{\\textbf{bold}}.}\n \\label{tab:bokeh_rendering}\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{5.2pt}\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.0}\n \\begin{tabular}{lccccccc}\n \\toprule\n \\multirow{2.5}{*}{Method} & \\multirow{2}{*}{\\makecell{No\\\\Calib.}} & \\multicolumn{3}{c}{EBB!} & \\multicolumn{3}{c}{RealBokeh} \\\\\n \\cmidrule(lr){3-5}\\cmidrule(lr){6-8}\n & & LPIPS$\\downarrow$ & DISTS$\\downarrow$ & FID$\\downarrow$ & LPIPS$\\downarrow$ & DISTS$\\downarrow$ & FID$\\downarrow$ \\\\\n \\midrule\n BokehMe & \\xmark & 0.3682 & 0.1780 & 38.6188 & 0.3166 & 0.1439 & 59.8446 \\\\\n BokehDiff & \\xmark & 0.4016 & 0.2411 & 58.0800 & 0.3309 & 0.1520 & 71.3716 \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\textbf{AnyBokeh (Ours)} & \\cmark & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{0.3615} & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{0.1475} & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{36.0778} & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{0.3016} & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{0.1125} & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{45.8692} \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n \\centering\n \\footnotesize\n \\caption{Defocus deblurring (bokeh-to-AIF) results. \n % We evaluate the bokeh-to-clear setting on EBB! and RealBokeh, where the target image is all-in-focus. \n No calibration is needed for all methods in this setting.\n Best results are marked in \\colorbox{cyan!20}{\\textbf{bold}}.}\n \\label{tab:defocus_deblurring}\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{6pt}\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.0}\n \\begin{tabular}{lcccccc}\n \\toprule\n \\multirow{2.5}{*}{Method} & \\multicolumn{3}{c}{EBB!} & \\multicolumn{3}{c}{RealBokeh} \\\\\n \\cmidrule(lr){2-4}\\cmidrule(lr){5-7}\n & LPIPS$\\downarrow$ & DISTS$\\downarrow$ & FID$\\downarrow$\n & LPIPS$\\downarrow$ & DISTS$\\downarrow$ & FID$\\downarrow$ \\\\\n \\midrule\n Restormer & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{0.4308} & 0.1943 & 56.5597 & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{0.3125} & 0.1352 & 57.1709 \\\\\n DRBNet & 0.4320 & 0.1775 & 50.4203 & 0.3237 & 0.1302 & 51.3630 \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\textbf{AnyBokeh (Ours)} & 0.4406 & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{0.1378} & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{38.5373} & 0.3423 & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{0.1033} & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{44.1042} \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n % \\vspace{-5mm}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{figure}[h]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\linewidth]{figures/lpips.pdf}\n \\caption{Qualitative examples illustrating the gap between LPIPS~\\cite{lpips} and visual quality in defocus deblurring. Although AnyBokeh may obtain higher LPIPS than baselines, it often recovers sharper structures and more realistic local details in severely defocused regions. Restoration baselines can achieve lower LPIPS by producing smoother outputs, but they tend to preserve residual blur and under-recover fine structures.}\n\\label{fig:defocus_lpips}\n \\label{fig:lpips}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Defocus Deblurring}\n\\label{sec:defocus_deblurring}\n\nWe evaluate defocus deblurring to examine whether AnyBokeh can effectively recover sharp structures when the target blur state requires removing existing defocus. We compare with Restormer~\\cite{Zamir2021Restormer} and DRBNet~\\cite{ruan2022drbnet}. As shown in Tab.~\\ref{tab:defocus_deblurring}, AnyBokeh achieves the best DISTS and FID on both EBB! and RealBokeh, indicating improved perceptual structure and distribution-level realism.\n\nAnyBokeh obtains slightly worse LPIPS than the restoration baselines. This discrepancy reflects a limitation of full-reference metrics for highly ill-posed generative restoration tasks. When an input region is severely defocused, the original high-frequency details are missing. A generative editor may recover sharper structures and synthesize visually plausible textures, but these details do not necessarily match the exact reference image at the pixel or feature level. As a result, LPIPS can penalize perceptually valid high-frequency recovery if the synthesized details differ from the ground truth.\n% \nFig.~\\ref{fig:lpips} illustrates this behavior. Compared with Restormer~\\cite{Zamir2021Restormer} and DRBNet~\\cite{ruan2022drbnet}, AnyBokeh often restores clearer object boundaries and more detailed local structures, especially in heavily blurred regions highlighted by the zoomed crops. However, because the recovered details are not guaranteed to be identical to the reference, the LPIPS score can be worse even when the visual result appears sharper and more realistic. In contrast, the restoration baselines tend to produce smoother outputs with residual defocus blur. Such outputs may remain closer to the reference in the LPIPS feature space, but they often under-recover fine structures and appear less visually sharp.\n% \nTherefore, LPIPS should be interpreted with caution in this setting. It remains useful for measuring reference similarity, but it does not fully capture the perceptual quality of plausible detail recovery under severe defocus.\n\n\\subsection{Ablation Studies}\n\\label{sec:ablation}\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n \\centering\n \\footnotesize\n \\caption{Ablation studies. We evaluate the effect of the two-stage design and source CoC conditioning. For both ablations, no tiling is used. All inputs are resized by the short edge and center-cropped. Best results are marked in \\colorbox{cyan!20}{\\textbf{bold}}.}\n \\label{tab:ablation}\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{6pt}\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.0}\n \\begin{tabular}{llcccc}\n \\toprule\n Ablation & Method & No Calib. & LPIPS$\\downarrow$ & DISTS$\\downarrow$ & FID$\\downarrow$ \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\multirow{2}{*}{Pipeline}\n & Single-stage & \\xmark & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{0.3058} & 0.1425 & 77.8112 \\\\\n & \\textbf{Two-stage (Ours)} & \\cmark & 0.3110 & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{0.1363} & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{76.8071} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\multirow{2}{*}{Source CoC}\n & w/o Source CoC & \\cmark & 0.3118 & 0.1413 & 81.0614 \\\\\n & \\textbf{w. Source CoC (Ours)} & \\cmark & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{0.3110} & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{0.1363} & \\cellcolor{cyan!20}\\textbf{76.8071} \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n % \\vspace{-5mm}\n\\end{table}\n\n\n\\textbf{One-stage vs. Two-stage.}\nWe ablate the necessity of our two-stage design by comparing it against a single-stage alternative that follows a more conventional depth-based pipeline. This variant first estimates monocular depth from the source image, then computes both source and target CoC maps from the estimated depth and EXIF metadata, and finally feeds these maps together with the source image into Stage~2. For target CoC computation, we use the source depth with the target optical settings, since the target image is unavailable during inference, and using target depth would introduce exposure bias. We use Depth-Pro~\\cite{depthpro} for high-quality monocular depth estimation. We evaluate this variant on 100 challenging RealBokeh pairs with strong source defocus, where the source f-number $<f/4.0$. Because the single-stage variant does not recover a source-specific optical fingerprint from the observed blur--disparity relation, we apply the same global bokeh-level calibration protocol as in Sec.~\\ref{sec:any2any}.\n% \nAs shown in Tab.~\\ref{tab:ablation}, the two-stage design improves DISTS and FID over the single-stage baseline, indicating better perceptual structure and realism. The single-stage variant obtains slightly better LPIPS, likely due to the same reason discussed in Sec.~\\ref{sec:defocus_deblurring}. The single-stage variant relies on depth estimated directly from severely defocused inputs, leading to inaccurate scene geometry understanding and suboptimal editing. In contrast, our Stage~1 jointly predicts $CoC_{src}$ and disparity from the defocused input, allowing the model to learn blur-aware geometry and estimate a transferable optical fingerprint. See Fig.~\\ref{fig:ablation}~(1) for visual comparison.\n\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.8\\linewidth]{figures/ablation.pdf}\n \\caption{Visual comparisons for ablation studies. We evaluate the effect of the two-stage design and source CoC conditioning. For both ablations, no tiling is used. All inputs are resized by the short edge and center-cropped.}\n \\label{fig:ablation}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\textbf{With vs. Without Source CoC.}\nWe further ablate dual-CoC conditioning in Stage~2 by removing $CoC_{src}$ from the input while keeping $CoC_{tgt}$ unchanged. This variant tests whether the target blur specification alone is sufficient for bokeh synthesis.\n% \nAs shown in Tab.~\\ref{tab:ablation}, using $CoC_{src}$ improves all metrics. Without $CoC_{src}$, the editor must infer the input blur state only from image appearance, which is ambiguous in regions with spatially varying or severe defocus. Providing both $CoC_{src}$ and $CoC_{tgt}$ explicitly specifies the blur-state transition, giving the model stronger guidance for more accurate editing, as shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:ablation}~(2).\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/5_discussion.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Discussion and Limitations}\n\\label{app:limitation}\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\linewidth]{figures/failure.pdf}\n \\caption{Failure cases under extreme source blur. (1) When the input is severely defocused (first row), missing high-frequency details limit a fully sharp reconstruction, although AnyBokeh improves as the source blur decreases (second and third rows) and remains clearer than the baseline. (2) When very large bokeh balls must be substantially reduced, AnyBokeh may leave residual or hollow bokeh artifacts, while the baseline often fails under such severe defocus. For both cases, the baseline with best quantitative results is used for comparison.}\n \\label{fig:failure}\n\\end{figure}\n\nAnyBokeh is built on the observation that the blur already present in a source image is not merely a degradation to be removed, but also carries useful optical information. By estimating the source CoC and disparity, our method transfers this source-specific optical fingerprint to the desired target setting and performs editing relative to the input blur state. This formulation avoids the need to canonicalize arbitrary inputs into an all-in-focus image, and our experiments show that explicitly conditioning on both source and target CoC provides effective guidance for spatially adaptive deblurring, preservation, and defocus synthesis.\n\nDespite these advantages, AnyBokeh still has limitations.\n% \nFirst, the method is bound by the amount of visual evidence preserved in the source image. When the input is extremely defocused, high-frequency textures and fine geometric structures are missing, making faithful reconstruction inherently ambiguous. As shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:failure}~(1), AnyBokeh may not fully recover sharp details from severely blurred inputs, although the reconstruction improves as the source blur becomes weaker and remains clearer than the baseline. \nA related failure mode occurs for extremely large bokeh balls, especially when the target setting requires a much larger f-number and therefore a substantial reduction of the bokeh size. In such cases, shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:failure}~(2), the model may leave residual bokeh artifacts or produce hollow structures. This is partly because such extreme bokeh balls are rare in our training data, and partly because the underlying scene content is heavily occluded by the large defocus disk. The limited coverage of such extreme bokeh balls in our training data can also affect the reverse direction: when the target setting requires enlarging small highlights into very large bokeh balls, the generated bokeh size may be slightly underestimated. However, this case usually results in less pronounced bokeh rather than structural artifacts. Nevertheless, AnyBokeh remains more stable than the deblur-then-render baseline, which often fails under these severe blur conditions.\n% \nSecond, our high-resolution inference relies on a tiling-and-stitching strategy to preserve the native aspect ratio and resolution of arbitrary input images. While this improves output quality and avoids resizing the whole image to a fixed resolution, it increases runtime compared with single-pass inference. Future work could improve efficiency with more compact backbones, better tile fusion strategies, or native high-resolution generative architectures. \n \nOverall, these limitations arise mainly in extreme blur or high-resolution settings, while AnyBokeh remains effective for a wide range of practical post-capture bokeh editing scenarios.\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/6_conclusion.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Conclusion}\n\\label{sec:conclusion}\n\nWe introduced \\textbf{AnyBokeh}, a physics-guided framework for any-to-any bokeh editing. Rather than forcing arbitrary inputs through an all-in-focus intermediate, AnyBokeh treats the source blur state as useful optical context and transfers its CoC-based optical fingerprint to the desired target focus and aperture setting. With dual-CoC conditioning, the editor explicitly models the relative transition between source and target blur states, enabling spatially adaptive bokeh editing without per-image bokeh-level calibration.\n% \nExperiments across any-to-any editing, AIF-to-bokeh rendering, and bokeh-to-AIF deblurring demonstrate the effectiveness of this formulation. Our ablations further show that both source CoC estimation and dual-CoC conditioning are important for faithful relative bokeh editing. \n% \nTogether with the proposed \\textbf{UnrealBokeh} dataset, which provides per-pixel depth and complete EXIF metadata for computing ground-truth signed CoC maps, our work offers a practical step toward physically grounded post-capture DoF editing from in-the-wild images.\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091160,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31960"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31960"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Saili Keshri"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Saili Keshri, Sudhanshu Barway, Mousumi Das and Abhishek Paswan"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Caught in the act: interaction-driven evolution in the nearby compact galaxy group Roberts Quartet (SCG0018-4854)"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"18 pages, 18 figures, accepted for publication in A&A (comments are welcome)"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"astro-ph.GA"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"We present a spatially resolved multiwavelength study of the compact galaxy group Roberts Quartet (RQ, SCG0018-4854), aimed at understanding interaction-driven galaxy evolution in a dense environment. RQ comprises of four galaxies (NGC 87, NGC 88, NGC 89, and NGC 92) that span a range of masses and evolutionary states. Using UV-to-IR data from GALEX, DECaLS, MUSE/VLT (IFU), VISTA/VIRCAM, 2MASS, and WISE, we investigate the interplay between kinematics, star formation, and stellar populations across the group. The spatially resolved analysis reveals disturbed stellar and gas kinematics, enhanced turbulence, and asymmetric structures in all members, consistent with repeated gravitational interactions. The most massive galaxy, NGC 92, exhibits prominent tidal features, a bar, and ring-like star-forming structures, indicative of interaction-driven gas inflows. Another massive member, NGC 89, shows suppressed star formation and signatures of AGN-driven feedback, while the lower-mass galaxies NGC 88 and the dwarf galaxy NGC 87 display enhanced star formation and kinematic decoupling between stellar and gas component consistent with recent gas accretion. Combining UV age estimates with non-parametric star formation histories, we constrain the recent interaction timescale of the group to <= 500 Myr, whereas the crossing timescale is 424 Myr. These results indicate that RQ is a dynamically young system undergoing ongoing assembly, where interactions, gas exchange, and feedback processes are actively shaping galaxy evolution. The dynamical complexity of the group further suggests that its present configuration may involve more than four progenitor components. In this context, RQ provides a nearby analogue of compact, rapidly evolving groups observed at high redshift by recent JWST observations, offering a resolved view of the physical processes governing galaxy assembly in the early Universe."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:01:41 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:01:41 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Keshri","Saili",""],["Barway","Sudhanshu",""],["Das","Mousumi",""],["Paswan","Abhishek",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Keshri\",\n \"Saili\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Barway\",\n \"Sudhanshu\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Das\",\n \"Mousumi\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Paswan\",\n \"Abhishek\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: Reference.bib\n================================================\n@article{Bacon2010,\n author = {Bacon, R. and Accardo, M. and Adjali, L. and Anwand, H. and Bauer, S. M. and Biswas, I. and Blaizot, J. and Boudon, D. and Brau-Nogue, S. and Caillier, P. and others},\n title = {The MUSE second-generation VLT instrument},\n journal = {Proc. SPIE},\n year = {2010},\n volume = {7735},\n pages = {773508},\n doi = {10.1117/12.856027}\n}\n\n@article{Schlafly2011,\n author = {Schlafly, E. F. and Finkbeiner, D. P.},\n title = {Measuring Reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stellar Spectra and Recalibrating SFD},\n journal = {ApJ},\n year = {2011},\n volume = {737},\n pages = {103},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103}\n}\n\n@article{Schlegel1998,\n author = {Schlegel, D. J. and Finkbeiner, D. P. and Davis, M.},\n title = {Maps of Dust Infrared Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Foregrounds},\n journal = {ApJ},\n year = {1998},\n volume = {500},\n pages = {525--553},\n doi = {10.1086/305772}\n}\n\n@article{Hickson1982,\n author = {Hickson, P.},\n title = {Systematic properties of compact groups of galaxies},\n journal = {ApJ},\n year = {1982},\n volume = {255},\n pages = {382--391},\n doi = {10.1086/159838}\n}\n\n@article{Hickson1992,\n author = {Hickson, P. and Mendes de Oliveira, C. and Huchra, J. P. and Palumbo, G. G.},\n title = {A photometric catalog of compact groups of galaxies},\n journal = {ApJ},\n year = {1992},\n volume = {399},\n pages = {353--377},\n doi = {10.1086/171934}\n}\n\n@article{Barnes1992,\n author = {Barnes, J. E. and Hernquist, L.},\n title = {Dynamics of interacting galaxies},\n journal = {Nature},\n year = {1992},\n volume = {360},\n pages = {715--718},\n doi = {10.1038/360715a0}\n}\n\n@article{Springel2005,\n author = {Springel, V. and Di Matteo, T. and Hernquist, L.},\n title = {Modelling feedback from stars and black holes in galaxy mergers},\n journal = {MNRAS},\n year = {2005},\n volume = {361},\n pages = {776--794},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09238.x}\n}\n\n@article{DiMatteo2007,\n author = {Di Matteo, P. and Combes, F. and Melchior, A. L. and Semelin, B.},\n title = {Star formation efficiency in galaxy interactions and mergers: a statistical study},\n journal = {A\\&A},\n year = {2007},\n volume = {468},\n pages = {61--81},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20066712}\n}\n\n@article{DiMatteo2008,\n author = {Di Matteo, P. and Bournaud, F. and Martig, M. and Combes, F. and Melchior, A. L. and Semelin, B.},\n title = {The many routes to star formation in galaxy interactions and mergers},\n journal = {A\\&A},\n year = {2008},\n volume = {492},\n pages = {31--47},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:200810521}\n}\n\n@article{Bekki2011,\n author = {Bekki, K. and Couch, W. J.},\n title = {Environmental effects on the evolution of galaxies in compact groups},\n journal = {MNRAS},\n year = {2011},\n volume = {415},\n pages = {1783--1796},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18813.x}\n}\n\n@article{Scott2014,\n author = {Scott, C. and Kaviraj, S.},\n title = {Galaxy mergers, starbursts and the growth of spheroids in a $\\Lambda$CDM Universe},\n journal = {MNRAS},\n year = {2014},\n volume = {437},\n pages = {2137--2148},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt2032}\n}\n\n@article{Bitsakis2011,\n author = {Bitsakis, T. and Charmandaris, V. and da Cunha, E. and D{\\'{\\i}}az-Santos, T. and Le Floc’h, E. and Magdis, G.},\n title = {Compact groups of galaxies as laboratories of galaxy evolution},\n journal = {A\\&A},\n year = {2011},\n volume = {533},\n pages = {A142},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201117330}\n}\n\n@article{Weigel2018,\n author = {Weigel, A. K. and Schawinski, K. and Treister, E. and Trakhtenbrot, B. and Sanders, D. B.},\n title = {AGN triggering in galaxy mergers and interactions},\n journal = {MNRAS},\n year = {2018},\n volume = {476},\n pages = {2308--2323},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty337}\n}\n\n@article{VerdesMontenegro2001,\n author = {Verdes-Montenegro, L. and Yun, M. S. and Williams, B. A. and Huchtmeier, W. K. and Del Olmo, A. and Perea, J.},\n title = {Where is the neutral gas in Hickson compact groups?},\n journal = {A\\&A},\n year = {2001},\n volume = {377},\n pages = {812--826},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20011131}\n}\n\n@article{RodriguezBaras2014,\n author = {Rodríguez-Baras, M. and Rosales-Ortega, F. F. and Díaz, A. I. and Sánchez, S. F. and Pasquali, A.},\n title = {The role of environment in shaping the star formation histories of galaxies},\n journal = {MNRAS},\n year = {2014},\n volume = {442},\n pages = {495--514},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu872}\n}\n\n@article{Bitsakis2014,\n author = {Bitsakis, T. and D{\\'{\\i}}az-Santos, T. and Charmandaris, V. and Le Floc’h, E. and Magdis, G. and da Cunha, E. and Leiton, R. and Smith Castelli, A. and Plana, H.},\n title = {The mid-infrared view of compact groups of galaxies: evidence for accelerated evolution},\n journal = {A\\&A},\n year = {2014},\n volume = {565},\n pages = {A25},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201322773}\n}\n\n@article{Walker2010,\n author = {Walker, L. M. and Johnson, K. E. and Gallagher, S. C. and Hibbard, J. E. and Hornschemeier, A. E. and Charlton, J. C. and Jarrett, T. H. and Reines, A. E.},\n title = {Star Formation in Compact Group Galaxies: Spitzer and GALEX Observations of the Interacting Galaxy Group HCG 31},\n journal = {AJ},\n year = {2010},\n volume = {140},\n pages = {1254--1264},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1254}\n}\n\n@article{deMello2008,\n author = {de Mello, D. F. and Smith, L. J. and Sabbi, E. and Gallagher, J. S. and Mountain, M. and Harbeck, D. R.},\n title = {The Evolutionary Status of Compact Groups of Galaxies: Clues from UV Observations},\n journal = {AJ},\n year = {2008},\n volume = {135},\n pages = {319--332},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-6256/135/1/319}\n}\n\n@article{Tzanavaris2010,\n author = {Tzanavaris, P. and Gallagher, S. C. and Hornschemeier, A. E. and Fedotov, K. and Basu-Zych, A. R. and Charlton, J. C.},\n title = {Star Formation and Galaxy Evolution in Compact Groups of Galaxies. II. UV Properties},\n journal = {ApJ},\n year = {2010},\n volume = {716},\n pages = {556--573},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/556}\n}\n\n@article{Gallagher2008,\n author = {Gallagher, S. C. and Johnson, K. E. and Hornschemeier, A. E. and Charlton, J. C. and Hibbard, J. E. and Bastian, N.},\n title = {Spitzer Observations of Compact Group Galaxies: Star Formation and the Warm Dust Component},\n journal = {ApJ},\n year = {2008},\n volume = {673},\n pages = {730--745},\n doi = {10.1086/524931}\n}\n\n@article{TorresFlores2014,\n author = {Torres-Flores, S. and Mendes de Oliveira, C. and Amram, P. and Plana, H. and Epinat, B. and Carignan, C.},\n title = {Ionized gas kinematics of compact group galaxies: tracing interaction signatures with Fabry–Perot data},\n journal = {MNRAS},\n year = {2014},\n volume = {439},\n pages = {1313--1328},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu039}\n}\n\n@article{Plana2020,\n author = {Plana, H. and Amram, P. and Mendes de Oliveira, C. and Torres-Flores, S. and Iglesias-Páramo, J.},\n title = {Galaxy kinematics and star formation in compact groups: evidence of interaction-driven evolution},\n journal = {MNRAS},\n year = {2020},\n volume = {494},\n pages = {2761--2777},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa927}\n}\n\n@article{Coziol1998,\n author = {Coziol, R. and Ribeiro, A. L. B. and de Carvalho, R. R. and Capelato, H. V.},\n title = {Activity in compact groups of galaxies. I. H$\\alpha$ observations of Hickson compact groups},\n journal = {ApJ},\n year = {1998},\n volume = {493},\n pages = {563--573},\n doi = {10.1086/305147}\n}\n\n@article{Martinez2010,\n author = {Martínez, M. A. and Del Olmo, A. and Coziol, R. and Perea, J. and Sulentic, J. W. and Verdes-Montenegro, L.},\n title = {Nuclear activity in compact groups of galaxies},\n journal = {AJ},\n year = {2010},\n volume = {139},\n pages = {1199--1210},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-6256/139/3/1199}\n}\n\n@article{Sohn2013,\n author = {Sohn, J. and Hwang, H. S. and Lee, M. G. and Lee, G.-H. and Lee, J. C. and Lee, S.-K.},\n title = {AGN Activity in Compact Groups of Galaxies},\n journal = {ApJ},\n year = {2013},\n volume = {771},\n pages = {106},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/771/2/106}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Morrissey07,\n author = {{Morrissey}, Patrick and {Conrow}, Tim and {Barlow}, Tom A. and {Small}, Todd and {Seibert}, Mark and {Wyder}, Ted K. and {Budav{\\'a}ri}, Tam{\\'a}s and {Arnouts}, Stephane and {Friedman}, Peter G. and {Forster}, Karl and {Martin}, D. Christopher and {Neff}, Susan G. and {Schiminovich}, David and {Bianchi}, Luciana and {Donas}, Jos{\\'e} and {Heckman}, Timothy M. and {Lee}, Young-Wook and {Madore}, Barry F. and {Milliard}, Bruno and {Rich}, R. Michael and {Szalay}, Alex S. and {Welsh}, Barry Y. and {Yi}, Sukyoung K.},\n title = \"{The Calibration and Data Products of GALEX}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Space Vehicles, Surveys, Telescopes, Ultraviolet: General, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = dec,\n volume = {173},\n number = {2},\n pages = {682-697},\n doi = {10.1086/520512},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0706.0755},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..173..682M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Martin05,\n author = {{Martin}, D. Christopher and {Fanson}, James and {Schiminovich}, David and {Morrissey}, Patrick and {Friedman}, Peter G. and {Barlow}, Tom A. and {Conrow}, Tim and {Grange}, Robert and {Jelinsky}, Patrick N. and {Milliard}, Bruno and {Siegmund}, Oswald H.~W. and {Bianchi}, Luciana and {Byun}, Yong-Ik and {Donas}, Jose and {Forster}, Karl and {Heckman}, Timothy M. and {Lee}, Young-Wook and {Madore}, Barry F. and {Malina}, Roger F. and {Neff}, Susan G. and {Rich}, R. Michael and {Small}, Todd and {Surber}, Frank and {Szalay}, Alex S. and {Welsh}, Barry and {Wyder}, Ted K.},\n title = \"{The Galaxy Evolution Explorer: A Space Ultraviolet Survey Mission}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: General, Space Vehicles: Instruments, Surveys, Ultraviolet: Galaxies, Ultraviolet: General, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = jan,\n volume = {619},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L1-L6},\n doi = {10.1086/426387},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0411302},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...619L...1M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Dey19,\n author = {{Dey}, Arjun and {Schlegel}, David J. and {Lang}, Dustin and {Blum}, Robert and {Burleigh}, Kaylan and {Fan}, Xiaohui and {Findlay}, Joseph R. and {Finkbeiner}, Doug and {Herrera}, David and {Juneau}, St{\\'e}phanie and {Landriau}, Martin and {Levi}, Michael and {McGreer}, Ian and {Meisner}, Aaron and {Myers}, Adam D. and {Moustakas}, John and {Nugent}, Peter and {Patej}, Anna and {Schlafly}, Edward F. and {Walker}, Alistair R. and {Valdes}, Francisco and {Weaver}, Benjamin A. and {Y{\\`e}che}, Christophe and {Zou}, Hu and {Zhou}, Xu and {Abareshi}, Behzad and {Abbott}, T.~M.~C. and {Abolfathi}, Bela and {Aguilera}, C. and {Alam}, Shadab and {Allen}, Lori and {Alvarez}, A. and {Annis}, James and {Ansarinejad}, Behzad and {Aubert}, Marie and {Beechert}, Jacqueline and {Bell}, Eric F. and {BenZvi}, Segev Y. and {Beutler}, Florian and {Bielby}, Richard M. and {Bolton}, Adam S. and {Brice{\\~n}o}, C{\\'e}sar and {Buckley-Geer}, Elizabeth J. and {Butler}, Karen and {Calamida}, Annalisa and {Carlberg}, Raymond G. and {Carter}, Paul and {Casas}, Ricard and {Castander}, Francisco J. and {Choi}, Yumi and {Comparat}, Johan and {Cukanovaite}, Elena and {Delubac}, Timoth{\\'e}e and {DeVries}, Kaitlin and {Dey}, Sharmila and {Dhungana}, Govinda and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Ding}, Zhejie and {Donaldson}, John B. and {Duan}, Yutong and {Duckworth}, Christopher J. and {Eftekharzadeh}, Sarah and {Eisenstein}, Daniel J. and {Etourneau}, Thomas and {Fagrelius}, Parker A. and {Farihi}, Jay and {Fitzpatrick}, Mike and {Font-Ribera}, Andreu and {Fulmer}, Leah and {G{\\\"a}nsicke}, Boris T. and {Gaztanaga}, Enrique and {George}, Koshy and {Gerdes}, David W. and {Gontcho}, Satya Gontcho A. and {Gorgoni}, Claudio and {Green}, Gregory and {Guy}, Julien and {Harmer}, Diane and {Hernandez}, M. and {Honscheid}, Klaus and {Huang}, Lijuan Wendy and {James}, David J. and {Jannuzi}, Buell T. and {Jiang}, Linhua and {Joyce}, Richard and {Karcher}, Armin and {Karkar}, Sonia and {Kehoe}, Robert and {Kneib}, Jean-Paul and {Kueter-Young}, Andrea and {Lan}, Ting-Wen and {Lauer}, Tod R. and {Le Guillou}, Laurent and {Le Van Suu}, Auguste and {Lee}, Jae Hyeon and {Lesser}, Michael and {Perreault Levasseur}, Laurence and {Li}, Ting S. and {Mann}, Justin L. and {Marshall}, Robert and {Mart{\\'\\i}nez-V{\\'a}zquez}, C.~E. and {Martini}, Paul and {du Mas des Bourboux}, H{\\'e}lion and {McManus}, Sean and {Meier}, Tobias Gabriel and {M{\\'e}nard}, Brice and {Metcalfe}, Nigel and {Mu{\\~n}oz-Guti{\\'e}rrez}, Andrea and {Najita}, Joan and {Napier}, Kevin and {Narayan}, Gautham and {Newman}, Jeffrey A. and {Nie}, Jundan and {Nord}, Brian and {Norman}, Dara J. and {Olsen}, Knut A.~G. and {Paat}, Anthony and {Palanque-Delabrouille}, Nathalie and {Peng}, Xiyan and {Poppett}, Claire L. and {Poremba}, Megan R. and {Prakash}, Abhishek and {Rabinowitz}, David and {Raichoor}, Anand and {Rezaie}, Mehdi and {Robertson}, A.~N. and {Roe}, Natalie A. and {Ross}, Ashley J. and {Ross}, Nicholas P. and {Rudnick}, Gregory and {Safonova}, Sasha and {Saha}, Abhijit and {S{\\'a}nchez}, F. Javier and {Savary}, Elodie and {Schweiker}, Heidi and {Scott}, Adam and {Seo}, Hee-Jong and {Shan}, Huanyuan and {Silva}, David R. and {Slepian}, Zachary and {Soto}, Christian and {Sprayberry}, David and {Staten}, Ryan and {Stillman}, Coley M. and {Stupak}, Robert J. and {Summers}, David L. and {Sien Tie}, Suk and {Tirado}, H. and {Vargas-Maga{\\~n}a}, Mariana and {Vivas}, A. Katherina and {Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Williams}, Doug and {Yang}, Jinyi and {Yang}, Qian and {Yapici}, Tolga and {Zaritsky}, Dennis and {Zenteno}, A. and {Zhang}, Kai and {Zhang}, Tianmeng and {Zhou}, Rongpu and {Zhou}, Zhimin},\n title = \"{Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {catalogs, surveys, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2019,\n month = may,\n volume = {157},\n number = {5},\n eid = {168},\n pages = {168},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1804.08657},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....157..168D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{Bacon10,\n author = {{Bacon}, R. and {Accardo}, M. and {Adjali}, L. and {Anwand}, H. and {Bauer}, S. and {Biswas}, I. and {Blaizot}, J. and {Boudon}, D. and {Brau-Nogue}, S. and {Brinchmann}, J. and {Caillier}, P. and {Capoani}, L. and {Carollo}, C.~M. and {Contini}, T. and {Couderc}, P. and {Daguis{\\'e}}, E. and {Deiries}, S. and {Delabre}, B. and {Dreizler}, S. and {Dubois}, J. and {Dupieux}, M. and {Dupuy}, C. and {Emsellem}, E. and {Fechner}, T. and {Fleischmann}, A. and {Fran{\\c{c}}ois}, M. and {Gallou}, G. and {Gharsa}, T. and {Glindemann}, A. and {Gojak}, D. and {Guiderdoni}, B. and {Hansali}, G. and {Hahn}, T. and {Jarno}, A. and {Kelz}, A. and {Koehler}, C. and {Kosmalski}, J. and {Laurent}, F. and {Le Floch}, M. and {Lilly}, S.~J. and {Lizon}, J. -L. and {Loupias}, M. and {Manescau}, A. and {Monstein}, C. and {Nicklas}, H. and {Olaya}, J. -C. and {Pares}, L. and {Pasquini}, L. and {P{\\'e}contal-Rousset}, A. and {Pell{\\'o}}, R. and {Petit}, C. and {Popow}, E. and {Reiss}, R. and {Remillieux}, A. and {Renault}, E. and {Roth}, M. and {Rupprecht}, G. and {Serre}, D. and {Schaye}, J. and {Soucail}, G. and {Steinmetz}, M. and {Streicher}, O. and {Stuik}, R. and {Valentin}, H. and {Vernet}, J. and {Weilbacher}, P. and {Wisotzki}, L. and {Yerle}, N.},\n title = \"{The MUSE second-generation VLT instrument}\",\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n booktitle = {Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III},\n year = 2010,\n editor = {{McLean}, Ian S. and {Ramsay}, Suzanne K. and {Takami}, Hideki},\n series = {Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series},\n volume = {7735},\n month = jul,\n eid = {773508},\n pages = {773508},\n doi = {10.1117/12.856027},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2211.16795},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010SPIE.7735E..08B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Skrutskie06,\n author = {{Skrutskie}, M.~F. and {Cutri}, R.~M. and {Stiening}, R. and {Weinberg}, M.~D. and {Schneider}, S. and {Carpenter}, J.~M. and {Beichman}, C. and {Capps}, R. and {Chester}, T. and {Elias}, J. and {Huchra}, J. and {Liebert}, J. and {Lonsdale}, C. and {Monet}, D.~G. and {Price}, S. and {Seitzer}, P. and {Jarrett}, T. and {Kirkpatrick}, J.~D. and {Gizis}, J.~E. and {Howard}, E. and {Evans}, T. and {Fowler}, J. and {Fullmer}, L. and {Hurt}, R. and {Light}, R. and {Kopan}, E.~L. and {Marsh}, K.~A. and {McCallon}, H.~L. and {Tam}, R. and {Van Dyk}, S. and {Wheelock}, S.},\n title = \"{The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS)}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Catalogs, Infrared: General, Surveys},\n year = 2006,\n month = feb,\n volume = {131},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1163-1183},\n doi = {10.1086/498708},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Wright10,\n author = {{Wright}, Edward L. and {Eisenhardt}, Peter R.~M. and {Mainzer}, Amy K. and {Ressler}, Michael E. and {Cutri}, Roc M. and {Jarrett}, Thomas and {Kirkpatrick}, J. Davy and {Padgett}, Deborah and {McMillan}, Robert S. and {Skrutskie}, Michael and {Stanford}, S.~A. and {Cohen}, Martin and {Walker}, Russell G. and {Mather}, John C. and {Leisawitz}, David and {Gautier}, III, Thomas N. and {McLean}, Ian and {Benford}, Dominic and {Lonsdale}, Carol J. and {Blain}, Andrew and {Mendez}, Bryan and {Irace}, William R. and {Duval}, Valerie and {Liu}, Fengchuan and {Royer}, Don and {Heinrichsen}, Ingolf and {Howard}, Joan and {Shannon}, Mark and {Kendall}, Martha and {Walsh}, Amy L. and {Larsen}, Mark and {Cardon}, Joel G. and {Schick}, Scott and {Schwalm}, Mark and {Abid}, Mohamed and {Fabinsky}, Beth and {Naes}, Larry and {Tsai}, Chao-Wei},\n title = \"{The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {infrared: general, space vehicles, surveys, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = dec,\n volume = {140},\n number = {6},\n pages = {1868-1881},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1008.0031},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140.1868W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Boquien19,\n author = {{Boquien}, M. and {Burgarella}, D. and {Roehlly}, Y. and {Buat}, V. and {Ciesla}, L. and {Corre}, D. and {Inoue}, A.~K. and {Salas}, H.},\n title = \"{CIGALE: a python Code Investigating GALaxy Emission}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {methods: data analysis, methods: numerical, methods: statistical, galaxies: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2019,\n month = feb,\n volume = {622},\n eid = {A103},\n pages = {A103},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201834156},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1811.03094},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A.103B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Bruzual03,\n author = {{Bruzual}, G. and {Charlot}, S.},\n title = \"{Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {stars: evolution, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = oct,\n volume = {344},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1000-1028},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0309134},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.344.1000B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Salpeter55,\n author = {{Salpeter}, Edwin E.},\n title = \"{The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1955,\n month = jan,\n volume = {121},\n pages = {161},\n doi = {10.1086/145971},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1955ApJ...121..161S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Draine07,\n author = {{Draine}, B.~T. and {Dale}, D.~A. and {Bendo}, G. and {Gordon}, K.~D. and {Smith}, J.~D.~T. and {Armus}, L. and {Engelbracht}, C.~W. and {Helou}, G. and {Kennicutt}, Jr., R.~C. and {Li}, A. and {Roussel}, H. and {Walter}, F. and {Calzetti}, D. and {Moustakas}, J. and {Murphy}, E.~J. and {Rieke}, G.~H. and {Bot}, C. and {Hollenbach}, D.~J. and {Sheth}, K. and {Teplitz}, H.~I.},\n title = \"{Dust Masses, PAH Abundances, and Starlight Intensities in the SINGS Galaxy Sample}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {ISM: Dust, Extinction, Galaxies: Abundances, Galaxies: General, Galaxies: ISM, Infrared: Galaxies, ISM: General, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = jul,\n volume = {663},\n number = {2},\n pages = {866-894},\n doi = {10.1086/518306},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0703213},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...663..866D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Draine14,\n author = {{Draine}, B.~T. and {Aniano}, G. and {Krause}, Oliver and {Groves}, Brent and {Sandstrom}, Karin and {Braun}, Robert and {Leroy}, Adam and {Klaas}, Ulrich and {Linz}, Hendrik and {Rix}, Hans-Walter and {Schinnerer}, Eva and {Schmiedeke}, Anika and {Walter}, Fabian},\n title = \"{Andromeda's Dust}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dust, extinction, infrared: galaxies, infrared: ISM, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2014,\n month = jan,\n volume = {780},\n number = {2},\n eid = {172},\n pages = {172},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/172},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1306.2304},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...780..172D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Stalevski16,\n author = {{Stalevski}, Marko and {Ricci}, Claudio and {Ueda}, Yoshihiro and {Lira}, Paulina and {Fritz}, Jacopo and {Baes}, Maarten},\n title = \"{The dust covering factor in active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {radiative transfer, galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = may,\n volume = {458},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2288-2302},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw444},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1602.06954},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.2288S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Calzetti00,\n author = {{Calzetti}, Daniela and {Armus}, Lee and {Bohlin}, Ralph C. and {Kinney}, Anne L. and {Koornneef}, Jan and {Storchi-Bergmann}, Thaisa},\n title = \"{The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: STARBURST, INFRARED: GALAXIES, INFRARED: ISM: CONTINUUM, ISM: DUST, EXTINCTION, Astrophysics},\n year = 2000,\n month = apr,\n volume = {533},\n number = {2},\n pages = {682-695},\n doi = {10.1086/308692},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9911459},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...533..682C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Bittner19,\n author = {{Bittner}, A. and {Falc{\\'o}n-Barroso}, J. and {Nedelchev}, B. and {Dorta}, A. and {Gadotti}, D.~A. and {Sarzi}, M. and {Molaeinezhad}, A. and {Iodice}, E. and {Rosado-Belza}, D. and {de Lorenzo-C{\\'a}ceres}, A. and {Fragkoudi}, F. and {Gal{\\'a}n-de Anta}, P.~M. and {Husemann}, B. and {M{\\'e}ndez-Abreu}, J. and {Neumann}, J. and {Pinna}, F. and {Querejeta}, M. and {S{\\'a}nchez-Bl{\\'a}zquez}, P. and {Seidel}, M.~K.},\n title = \"{The GIST pipeline: A multi-purpose tool for the analysis and visualisation of (integral-field) spectroscopic data}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {methods: data analysis, techniques: spectroscopic, galaxies: individual: NGC 1433, galaxies: stellar content, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = \"2019\",\n month = \"Aug\",\n volume = {628},\n eid = {A117},\n pages = {A117},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201935829},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1906.04746},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...628A.117B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Cappellari2022,\n author = {{Cappellari}, M.},\n title = \"{Full spectrum fitting with photometry in ppxf: non-parametric\n star formation history, metallicity and the quenching boundary from\n 3200 LEGA-C galaxies at redshift $z\\approx0.8$}\",\n journal = {MNRAS submitted},\n eprint = {2208.14974},\n year = 2022,\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2208.14974}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Cappellari04,\n author = {{Cappellari}, Michele and {Emsellem}, Eric},\n title = \"{Parametric Recovery of Line-of-Sight Velocity Distributions from Absorption-Line Spectra of Galaxies via Penalized Likelihood}\",\n journal = {\\pasp},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 3384, Galaxies: Kinematics and Dynamics, line: profiles, Methods: Numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = feb,\n volume = {116},\n number = {816},\n pages = {138-147},\n doi = {10.1086/381875},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0312201},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004PASP..116..138C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Cappellari17,\n author = {{Cappellari}, Michele},\n title = \"{Improving the full spectrum fitting method: accurate convolution with Gauss-Hermite functions}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {techniques: radial velocities, techniques: spectroscopic, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = apr,\n volume = {466},\n number = {1},\n pages = {798-811},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw3020},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1607.08538},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466..798C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Cappellari03,\n author = {{Cappellari}, Michele and {Copin}, Yannick},\n title = \"{Adaptive spatial binning of integral-field spectroscopic data using Voronoi tessellations}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: data analysis, techniques: photometric, techniques: spectroscopic, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = jun,\n volume = {342},\n number = {2},\n pages = {345-354},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06541.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0302262},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.342..345C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Sarzi06,\n author = {{Sarzi}, Marc and {Falc{\\'o}n-Barroso}, Jes{\\'u}s and {Davies}, Roger L. and {Bacon}, Roland and {Bureau}, Martin and {Cappellari}, Michele and {de Zeeuw}, P. Tim and {Emsellem}, Eric and {Fathi}, Kambiz and {Krajnovi{\\'c}}, Davor and {Kuntschner}, Harald and {McDermid}, Richard M. and {Peletier}, Reynier F.},\n title = \"{The SAURON project - V. Integral-field emission-line kinematics of 48 elliptical and lenticular galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: ISM, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = mar,\n volume = {366},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1151-1200},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09839.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0511307},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.366.1151S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Falcon06,\n author = {{Falc{\\'o}n-Barroso}, Jes{\\'u}s and {Bacon}, Roland and {Bureau}, Martin and {Cappellari}, Michele and {Davies}, Roger L. and {de Zeeuw}, P.~T. and {Emsellem}, Eric and {Fathi}, Kambiz and {Krajnovi{\\'c}}, Davor and {Kuntschner}, Harald and {McDermid}, Richard M. and {Peletier}, Reynier F. and {Sarzi}, Marc},\n title = \"{The SAURON project - VII. Integral-field absorption and emission-line kinematics of 24 spiral galaxy bulges}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: bulges: galaxies: evolution: galaxies: formation: galaxies: kinematics and dynamics: galaxies: ISM: galaxies: spiral, galaxies: bulges, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: ISM, galaxies: spiral, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = jun,\n volume = {369},\n number = {2},\n pages = {529-566},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10261.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0603161},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.369..529F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Bittner21,\n author = {{Bittner}, Adrian and {de Lorenzo-C{\\'a}ceres}, Adriana and {Gadotti}, Dimitri A. and {S{\\'a}nchez-Bl{\\'a}zquez}, Patricia and {Neumann}, Justus and {Coelho}, Paula and {Falc{\\'o}n-Barroso}, Jes{\\'u}s and {Fragkoudi}, Francesca and {Kim}, Taehyun and {Mart{\\'\\i}n-Navarro}, Ignacio and {M{\\'e}ndez-Abreu}, Jairo and {P{\\'e}rez}, Isabel and {Querejeta}, Miguel and {van de Ven}, Glenn},\n title = \"{Galaxies within galaxies in the TIMER survey: stellar populations of inner bars are scaled replicas of main bars}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: structure, galaxies: spiral, galaxies: stellar content, galaxies: groups: individual: NGC 1291, galaxies: individual: NGC 1433, galaxies: individual: NGC 5850, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = feb,\n volume = {646},\n eid = {A42},\n pages = {A42},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202039505},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2012.04661},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...646A..42B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Hickson97,\n author = {{Hickson}, Paul},\n title = \"{Compact Groups of Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n year = 1997,\n month = jan,\n volume = {35},\n pages = {357-388},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.357},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9710289},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ARA&A..35..357H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Hickson92,\n author = {{Hickson}, Paul and {Mendes de Oliveira}, Claudia and {Huchra}, John P. and {Palumbo}, Giorgio G.},\n title = \"{Dynamical Properties of Compact Groups of Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Compact Galaxies, Mass To Light Ratios, Radial Velocity, Velocity Distribution, Interstellar Matter, Luminosity, Red Shift, Astrophysics, GALAXIES: CLUSTERING, GALAXIES: DISTANCES AND REDSHIFTS, GALAXIES: INTERSTELLAR MATTER, GALAXIES: LUMINOSITY FUNCTION, MASS FUNCTION},\n year = 1992,\n month = nov,\n volume = {399},\n pages = {353},\n doi = {10.1086/171932},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...399..353H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Hickson82,\n author = {{Hickson}, P.},\n title = \"{Systematic properties of compact groups of galaxies.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galactic Clusters, Galactic Structure, Galaxies, Luminosity, Brightness Distribution, Dynamic Response, Spiral Galaxies, Statistical Analysis, Astrophysics},\n year = 1982,\n month = apr,\n volume = {255},\n pages = {382-391},\n doi = {10.1086/159838},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...255..382H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Rodriguez-Gomez15,\n author = {{Rodriguez-Gomez}, Vicente and {Genel}, Shy and {Vogelsberger}, Mark and {Sijacki}, Debora and {Pillepich}, Annalisa and {Sales}, Laura V. and {Torrey}, Paul and {Snyder}, Greg and {Nelson}, Dylan and {Springel}, Volker and {Ma}, Chung-Pei and {Hernquist}, Lars},\n title = \"{The merger rate of galaxies in the Illustris simulation: a comparison with observations and semi-empirical models}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: interactions, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = may,\n volume = {449},\n number = {1},\n pages = {49-64},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv264},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1502.01339},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449...49R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Springel05,\n author = {{Springel}, Volker and {Di Matteo}, Tiziana and {Hernquist}, Lars},\n title = \"{Modelling feedback from stars and black holes in galaxy mergers}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: active, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: starburst, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = aug,\n volume = {361},\n number = {3},\n pages = {776-794},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09238.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0411108},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.361..776S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Scott14,\n author = {{Scott}, Caroline and {Kaviraj}, Sugata},\n title = \"{Star formation and AGN activity in interacting galaxies: a near-UV perspective}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = jan,\n volume = {437},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2137-2145},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt2014},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1310.5148},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.437.2137S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Weigel18,\n author = {{Weigel}, Anna K. and {Schawinski}, Kevin and {Treister}, Ezequiel and {Trakhtenbrot}, Benny and {Sanders}, David B.},\n title = \"{The fraction of AGNs in major merger galaxies and its luminosity dependence}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = may,\n volume = {476},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2308-2317},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty383},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1802.04277},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.2308W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Barnes92,\n author = {{Barnes}, Joshua E. and {Hernquist}, Lars},\n title = \"{Formation of dwarf galaxies in tidal tails}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n keywords = {Disk Galaxies, Dwarf Galaxies, Elliptical Galaxies, Galactic Evolution, Interacting Galaxies, Dark Matter, Digital Simulation, Interstellar Gas, Mass To Light Ratios, Tides, Astrophysics},\n year = 1992,\n month = dec,\n volume = {360},\n number = {6406},\n pages = {715-717},\n doi = {10.1038/360715a0},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992Natur.360..715B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Di-Matteo07,\n author = {{Di Matteo}, P. and {Combes}, F. and {Melchior}, A. -L. and {Semelin}, B.},\n title = \"{Star formation efficiency in galaxy interactions and mergers: a statistical study}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: starburst, methods: numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = jun,\n volume = {468},\n number = {1},\n pages = {61-81},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20066959},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0703212},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...468...61D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Di-Matteo08,\n author = {{Di Matteo}, P. and {Bournaud}, F. and {Martig}, M. and {Combes}, F. and {Melchior}, A. -L. and {Semelin}, B.},\n title = \"{On the frequency, intensity, and duration of starburst episodes triggered by galaxy interactions and mergers}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: starburst, methods: numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = dec,\n volume = {492},\n number = {1},\n pages = {31-49},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:200809480},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0809.2592},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...492...31D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Natale10,\n author = {{Natale}, G. and {Tuffs}, R.~J. and {Xu}, C.~K. and {Popescu}, C.~C. and {Fischera}, J. and {Lisenfeld}, U. and {Lu}, N. and {Appleton}, P. and {Dopita}, M. and {Duc}, P. -A. and {Gao}, Y. and {Reach}, W. and {Sulentic}, J. and {Yun}, M.},\n title = \"{Dust Emission and Star Formation in Stephan's Quintet}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dust, extinction, galaxies: groups: individual: HGC92, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: star formation, infrared: general, intergalactic medium, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = dec,\n volume = {725},\n number = {1},\n pages = {955-984},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/955},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1010.1227},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...725..955N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Baras14,\n author = {{Rodr{\\'\\i}guez-Baras}, M. and {Rosales-Ortega}, F.~F. and {D{\\'\\i}az}, A.~I. and {S{\\'a}nchez}, S.~F. and {Pasquali}, A.},\n title = \"{A study of the ionized gas in Stephan's Quintet from integral field spectroscopy observations★}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: data analysis, techniques: imaging spectroscopy, galaxies: groups: individual: Stephan's Quintet, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: ISM, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2014,\n month = jul,\n volume = {442},\n number = {1},\n pages = {495-508},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu851},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1405.0880},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.442..495R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Lelli22,\n author = {{Lelli}, Federico},\n title = \"{Gas dynamics in dwarf galaxies as testbeds for dark matter and galaxy evolution}\",\n journal = {Nature Astronomy},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology},\n year = 2022,\n month = jan,\n volume = {6},\n pages = {35-47},\n doi = {10.1038/s41550-021-01562-2},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2201.11752},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022NatAs...6...35L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Karachentsev04,\n author = {{Karachentsev}, Igor D. and {Karachentseva}, Valentina E. and {Huchtmeier}, Walter K. and {Makarov}, Dmitry I.},\n title = \"{A Catalog of Neighboring Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Distances and Redshifts, Galaxies: Fundamental Parameters, Galaxies: Luminosity Function, Mass Function},\n year = 2004,\n month = apr,\n volume = {127},\n number = {4},\n pages = {2031-2068},\n doi = {10.1086/382905},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....127.2031K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Bergvall12,\nauthor=\"Bergvall, Nils\",\neditor=\"Papaderos, Polychronis\nand Recchi, Simone\nand Hensler, Gerhard\",\ntitle=\"Star Forming Dwarf Galaxies\",\nbooktitle=\"Dwarf Galaxies: Keys to Galaxy Formation and Evolution\",\nyear=\"2012\",\npublisher=\"Springer Berlin Heidelberg\",\naddress=\"Berlin, Heidelberg\",\npages=\"175--194\",\nisbn=\"978-3-642-22018-0\"\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Weisz14a,\n author = {{Weisz}, Daniel R. and {Dolphin}, Andrew E. and {Skillman}, Evan D. and {Holtzman}, Jon and {Gilbert}, Karoline M. and {Dalcanton}, Julianne J. and {Williams}, Benjamin F.},\n title = \"{The Star Formation Histories of Local Group Dwarf Galaxies. I. Hubble Space Telescope/Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 Observations}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: dwarf, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: stellar content, Local Group, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = jul,\n volume = {789},\n number = {2},\n eid = {147},\n pages = {147},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/147},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1404.7144},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...789..147W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Weisz14b,\n author = {{Weisz}, Daniel R. and {Dolphin}, Andrew E. and {Skillman}, Evan D. and {Holtzman}, Jon and {Gilbert}, Karoline M. and {Dalcanton}, Julianne J. and {Williams}, Benjamin F.},\n title = \"{The Star Formation Histories of Local Group Dwarf Galaxies. II. Searching For Signatures of Reionization}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark ages, reionization, first stars, galaxies: dwarf, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: stellar content, Local Group, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = jul,\n volume = {789},\n number = {2},\n eid = {148},\n pages = {148},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/148},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1405.3281},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...789..148W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Meurer95,\n author = {{Meurer}, G.~R. and {Heckman}, T.~M. and {Leitherer}, C. and {Kinney}, A. and {Robert}, C. and {Garnett}, D.~R.},\n title = \"{Starbursts and Star Clusters in the Ultraviolet}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: STARBURST, ULTRAVIOLET: GALAXIES, GALAXIES: ISM, Astrophysics},\n year = 1995,\n month = dec,\n volume = {110},\n pages = {2665},\n doi = {10.1086/117721},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9509038},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995AJ....110.2665M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Bertin96,\n author = {{Bertin}, E. and {Arnouts}, S.},\n title = \"{SExtractor: Software for source extraction.}\",\n journal = {\\aaps},\n keywords = {METHODS: DATA ANALYSIS, TECHNIQUES: IMAGE PROCESSING, GALAXIES: PHOTOMETRY},\n year = 1996,\n month = jun,\n volume = {117},\n pages = {393-404},\n doi = {10.1051/aas:1996164},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&AS..117..393B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Leitherer99,\n author = {{Leitherer}, Claus and {Schaerer}, Daniel and {Goldader}, Jeffrey D. and {Delgado}, Rosa M. Gonz{\\'a}lez and {Robert}, Carmelle and {Kune}, Denis Foo and {de Mello}, Du{\\'\\i}lia F. and {Devost}, Daniel and {Heckman}, Timothy M.},\n title = \"{Starburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: EVOLUTION, GALAXIES: FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETERS, GALAXIES: STARBURST, GALAXIES: STELLAR CONTENT, METHODS: NUMERICAL, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Fundamental Parameters, Galaxies: Starburst, Galaxies: Stellar Content, Methods: Numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 1999,\n month = jul,\n volume = {123},\n number = {1},\n pages = {3-40},\n doi = {10.1086/313233},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9902334},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..123....3L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Cardelli89,\n author = {{Cardelli}, Jason A. and {Clayton}, Geoffrey C. and {Mathis}, John S.},\n title = \"{The Relationship between Infrared, Optical, and Ultraviolet Extinction}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Infrared Spectra, Interstellar Extinction, Ultraviolet Spectra, Visible Spectrum, Computational Astrophysics, Interstellar Matter, Iue, Astrophysics, INTERSTELLAR: MATTER, ULTRAVIOLET: SPECTRA},\n year = 1989,\n month = oct,\n volume = {345},\n pages = {245},\n doi = {10.1086/167900},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...345..245C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Kennicutt98,\n author = {{Kennicutt}, Robert C., Jr.},\n title = \"{Star Formation in Galaxies Along the Hubble Sequence}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n year = 1998,\n month = jan,\n volume = {36},\n pages = {189-232},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9807187},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ARA&A..36..189K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Leroy08,\n author = {{Leroy}, Adam K. and {Walter}, Fabian and {Brinks}, Elias and {Bigiel}, Frank and {de Blok}, W.~J.~G. and {Madore}, Barry and {Thornley}, M.~D.},\n title = \"{The Star Formation Efficiency in Nearby Galaxies: Measuring Where Gas Forms Stars Effectively}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: ISM, radio lines: galaxies, stars: formation, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = dec,\n volume = {136},\n number = {6},\n pages = {2782-2845},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2782},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0810.2556},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136.2782L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Onodera16,\n author = {{Onodera}, M. and {Carollo}, C.~M. and {Lilly}, S. and {Renzini}, A. and {Arimoto}, N. and {Capak}, P. and {Daddi}, E. and {Scoville}, N. and {Tacchella}, S. and {Tatehora}, S. and {Zamorani}, G.},\n title = \"{ISM Excitation and Metallicity of Star-forming Galaxies at z ≃ 3.3 from Near-IR Spectroscopy}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = may,\n volume = {822},\n number = {1},\n eid = {42},\n pages = {42},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/42},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1602.02779},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...822...42O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Davies16,\n author = {{Davies}, L.~J.~M. and {Driver}, S.~P. and {Robotham}, A.~S.~G. and {Grootes}, M.~W. and {Popescu}, C.~C. and {Tuffs}, R.~J. and {Hopkins}, A. and {Alpaslan}, M. and {Andrews}, S.~K. and {Bland-Hawthorn}, J. and {Bremer}, M.~N. and {Brough}, S. and {Brown}, M.~J.~I. and {Cluver}, M.~E. and {Croom}, S. and {da Cunha}, E. and {Dunne}, L. and {Lara-L{\\'o}pez}, M.~A. and {Liske}, J. and {Loveday}, J. and {Moffett}, A.~J. and {Owers}, M. and {Phillipps}, S. and {Sansom}, A.~E. and {Taylor}, E.~N. and {Michalowski}, M.~J. and {Ibar}, E. and {Smith}, M. and {Bourne}, N.},\n title = \"{GAMA/H-ATLAS: a meta-analysis of SFR indicators - comprehensive measures of the SFR-M$_{*}$ relation and cosmic star formation history at z < 0.4}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = sep,\n volume = {461},\n number = {1},\n pages = {458-485},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw1342},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1606.06299},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461..458D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Kennicutt09,\n author = {{Kennicutt}, Jr., Robert C. and {Hao}, Cai-Na and {Calzetti}, Daniela and {Moustakas}, John and {Dale}, Daniel A. and {Bendo}, George and {Engelbracht}, Charles W. and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Lee}, Janice C.},\n title = \"{Dust-corrected Star Formation Rates of Galaxies. I. Combinations of H{\\ensuremath{\\alpha}} and Infrared Tracers}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dust, extinction, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: ISM, H II regions, stars: formation, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = oct,\n volume = {703},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1672-1695},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/1672},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0908.0203},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...703.1672K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Hao11,\n author = {{Hao}, Cai-Na and {Kennicutt}, Robert C. and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Calzetti}, Daniela and {Dale}, Daniel A. and {Moustakas}, John},\n title = \"{Dust-corrected Star Formation Rates of Galaxies. II. Combinations of Ultraviolet and Infrared Tracers}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dust, extinction, galaxies: ISM, infrared: galaxies, ultraviolet: galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = nov,\n volume = {741},\n number = {2},\n eid = {124},\n pages = {124},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/124},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1108.2837},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...741..124H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Calzetti94,\n author = {{Calzetti}, Daniela and {Kinney}, Anne L. and {Storchi-Bergmann}, Thaisa},\n title = \"{Dust Extinction of the Stellar Continua in Starburst Galaxies: The Ultraviolet and Optical Extinction Law}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Astronomical Models, Continuums, Distribution Functions, Interplanetary Dust, Interstellar Extinction, Metallicity, Spectra, Spectral Energy Distribution, Starburst Galaxies, Ultraviolet Spectra, Analytic Functions, Apertures, Average, Calibrating, Derivation, Extraction, Iue, Numerical Analysis, Optimization, Photometry, Astrophysics, GALAXIES: ISM, GALAXIES: PHOTOMETRY, GALAXIES: STARBURST, ISM: DUST, EXTINCTION, ULTRAVIOLET: GALAXIES},\n year = 1994,\n month = jul,\n volume = {429},\n pages = {582},\n doi = {10.1086/174346},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...429..582C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Reddy18,\n author = {{Reddy}, Naveen A. and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Bouwens}, Rychard J. and {Montes}, Mireia and {Illingworth}, Garth D. and {Steidel}, Charles C. and {van Dokkum}, Pieter G. and {Atek}, Hakim and {Carollo}, Marcella C. and {Cibinel}, Anna and {Holden}, Brad and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Magee}, Dan and {Morselli}, Laura and {Nelson}, Erica J. and {Wilkins}, Steve},\n title = \"{The HDUV Survey: A Revised Assessment of the Relationship between UV Slope and Dust Attenuation for High-redshift Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark ages, reionization, first stars, dust, extinction, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: ISM, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = jan,\n volume = {853},\n number = {1},\n eid = {56},\n pages = {56},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3e7},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1705.09302},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...853...56R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Walker07,\n author = {{Walker}, Matthew G. and {Mateo}, Mario and {Olszewski}, Edward W. and {Gnedin}, Oleg Y. and {Wang}, Xiao and {Sen}, Bodhisattva and {Woodroofe}, Michael},\n title = \"{Velocity Dispersion Profiles of Seven Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Dark Matter, Galaxies: Dwarf, Galaxies: Kinematics and Dynamics, Galaxies: Local Group, Techniques: Radial Velocities, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = sep,\n volume = {667},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L53-L56},\n doi = {10.1086/521998},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0708.0010},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...667L..53W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Pietrinferni04,\n author = {{Pietrinferni}, Adriano and {Cassisi}, Santi and {Salaris}, Maurizio and {Castelli}, Fiorella},\n title = \"{A Large Stellar Evolution Database for Population Synthesis Studies. I. Scaled Solar Models and Isochrones}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Stellar Content, Galaxy: Disk, Galaxy: Open Clusters and Associations: General, Stars: Evolution, Stars: Horizontal-Branch, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = sep,\n volume = {612},\n number = {1},\n pages = {168-190},\n doi = {10.1086/422498},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0405193},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...612..168P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Pietrinferni06,\n author = {{Pietrinferni}, Adriano and {Cassisi}, Santi and {Salaris}, Maurizio and {Castelli}, Fiorella},\n title = \"{A Large Stellar Evolution Database for Population Synthesis Studies. II. Stellar Models and Isochrones for an {\\ensuremath{\\alpha}}-enhanced Metal Distribution}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Stellar Content, Galaxy: Globular Clusters: General, Stars: Evolution, Stars: Horizontal-Branch, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = may,\n volume = {642},\n number = {2},\n pages = {797-812},\n doi = {10.1086/501344},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0603721},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642..797P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Pietrinferni09,\n author = {{Pietrinferni}, Adriano and {Cassisi}, Santi and {Salaris}, Maurizio and {Percival}, Susan and {Ferguson}, Jason W.},\n title = \"{A Large Stellar Evolution Database for Population Synthesis Studies. V. Stellar Models and Isochrones with CNONa Abundance Anticorrelations}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: stellar content, globular clusters: general, stars: abundances, stars: evolution, stars: horizontal-branch, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = may,\n volume = {697},\n number = {1},\n pages = {275-282},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/275},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0903.0825},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.SR},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...697..275P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Pietrinferni13,\n author = {{Pietrinferni}, Adriano and {Cassisi}, Santi and {Salaris}, Maurizio and {Hidalgo}, Sebastian},\n title = \"{The BaSTI Stellar Evolution Database: models for extremely metal-poor and super-metal-rich stellar populations}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {stars: evolution, stars: interiors, stars: late-type, Hertzsprung-Russell and C-M diagrams, stars: low-mass, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = oct,\n volume = {558},\n eid = {A46},\n pages = {A46},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201321950},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1308.3850},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.SR},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...558A..46P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Kroupa01,\n author = {{Kroupa}, Pavel},\n title = \"{On the variation of the initial mass function}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {BINARIES: GENERAL, STARS: FORMATION, STARS: KINEMATICS, STARS: LUMINOSITY FUNCTION, MASS FUNCTION, GLOBULAR CLUSTERS: GENERAL, OPEN CLUSTERS AND ASSOCIATIONS: GENERAL, Astrophysics},\n year = 2001,\n month = apr,\n volume = {322},\n number = {2},\n pages = {231-246},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0009005},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.322..231K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Vazdekis15,\n author = {{Vazdekis}, A. and {Coelho}, P. and {Cassisi}, S. and {Ricciardelli}, E. and {Falc{\\'o}n-Barroso}, J. and {S{\\'a}nchez-Bl{\\'a}zquez}, P. and {La Barbera}, F. and {Beasley}, M.~A. and {Pietrinferni}, A.},\n title = \"{Evolutionary stellar population synthesis with MILES - II. Scaled-solar and {\\ensuremath{\\alpha}}-enhanced models}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {stars: fundamental parameters, globular clusters: general, galaxies: abundances, galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = may,\n volume = {449},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1177-1214},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv151},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1504.08032},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.1177V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Vazdekis10,\n author = {{Vazdekis}, A. and {S{\\'a}nchez-Bl{\\'a}zquez}, P. and {Falc{\\'o}n-Barroso}, J. and {Cenarro}, A.~J. and {Beasley}, M.~A. and {Cardiel}, N. and {Gorgas}, J. and {Peletier}, R.~F.},\n title = \"{Evolutionary stellar population synthesis with MILES - I. The base models and a new line index system}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = jun,\n volume = {404},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1639-1671},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16407.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1004.4439},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.404.1639V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Pettini04,\n author = {{Pettini}, Max and {Pagel}, Bernard E.~J.},\n title = \"{[OIII]/[NII] as an abundance indicator at high redshift}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {ISM: abundances, HII regions, galaxies: abundances, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = mar,\n volume = {348},\n number = {3},\n pages = {L59-L63},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07591.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0401128},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.348L..59P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Asplund06,\n author = {{Asplund}, Martin and {Lambert}, David L. and {Nissen}, Poul Erik and {Primas}, Francesca and {Smith}, Verne V.},\n title = \"{Lithium Isotopic Abundances in Metal-poor Halo Stars}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Early Universe, Galaxy: Evolution, Stars: Abundances, Stars: Atmospheres, Stars: Population II, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = jun,\n volume = {644},\n number = {1},\n pages = {229-259},\n doi = {10.1086/503538},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0510636},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...644..229A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Ellison08,\n author = {{Ellison}, Sara L. and {Patton}, David R. and {Simard}, Luc and {McConnachie}, Alan W.},\n title = \"{Clues to the Origin of the Mass-Metallicity Relation: Dependence on Star Formation Rate and Galaxy Size}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {galaxies: abundances, galaxies: ISM, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = jan,\n volume = {672},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L107},\n doi = {10.1086/527296},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0711.4833},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...672L.107E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Mannucci10,\n author = {{Mannucci}, F. and {Cresci}, G. and {Maiolino}, R. and {Marconi}, A. and {Gnerucci}, A.},\n title = \"{A fundamental relation between mass, star formation rate and metallicity in local and high-redshift galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: abundances, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: starburst, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = nov,\n volume = {408},\n number = {4},\n pages = {2115-2127},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17291.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1005.0006},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408.2115M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Yates12,\n author = {{Yates}, Robert M. and {Kauffmann}, Guinevere and {Guo}, Qi},\n title = \"{The relation between metallicity, stellar mass and star formation in galaxies: an analysis of observational and model data}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {ISM: abundances, galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = may,\n volume = {422},\n number = {1},\n pages = {215-231},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20595.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1107.3145},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.422..215Y},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Cid11,\n author = {{Cid Fernandes}, R. and {Stasi{\\'n}ska}, G. and {Mateus}, A. and {Vale Asari}, N.},\n title = \"{A comprehensive classification of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: how to tell true from fake AGN?}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: statistics, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = may,\n volume = {413},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1687-1699},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18244.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1012.4426},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.413.1687C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@article{Baldwin81,\ndoi = {10.1086/130766},\nurl = {https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/130766},\nyear = {1981},\nmonth = {feb},\npublisher = {The Astronomical Society of the Pacific},\nvolume = {93},\nnumber = {551},\npages = {5},\nauthor = {Baldwin, J. A. and Phillips, M. M. and Terlevich, R.},\ntitle = {CLASSIFICATION PARAMETERS FOR THE EMISSION-LINE SPECTRA OF EXTRAGALACTIC OBJECTS.},\njournal = {Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific},\nabstract = {An investigation is made of the merits of various emission-line intensity ratios for classifying the spectra of extragalactic objects. It is shown empirically that several combinations of easily-measured lines can be used to separate objects into one of four categories according to the principal excitation mechanism: normal H II regions, planetary nebulae, objects photoionized by a power-law continuum, and objects excited by shock-wave heating. A two-dimensional quantitative classification scheme is suggested.}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Kewley01,\n author = {{Kewley}, L.~J. and {Dopita}, M.~A. and {Sutherland}, R.~S. and {Heisler}, C.~A. and {Trevena}, J.},\n title = \"{Theoretical Modeling of Starburst Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Starburst, Radiation Mechanisms: Thermal, Astrophysics},\n year = 2001,\n month = jul,\n volume = {556},\n number = {1},\n pages = {121-140},\n doi = {10.1086/321545},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0106324},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...556..121K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Kauffmann03,\n author = {{Kauffmann}, Guinevere and {Heckman}, Timothy M. and {Tremonti}, Christy and {Brinchmann}, Jarle and {Charlot}, St{\\'e}phane and {White}, Simon D.~M. and {Ridgway}, Susan E. and {Brinkmann}, Jon and {Fukugita}, Masataka and {Hall}, Patrick B. and {Ivezi{\\'c}}, {\\v{Z}}eljko and {Richards}, Gordon T. and {Schneider}, Donald P.},\n title = \"{The host galaxies of active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, galaxies: starburst, galaxies: stellar content, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = dec,\n volume = {346},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1055-1077},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0304239},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.346.1055K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Stasinska08,\n author = {{Stasi{\\'n}ska}, G. and {Vale Asari}, N. and {Cid Fernandes}, R. and {Gomes}, J.~M. and {Schlickmann}, M. and {Mateus}, A. and {Schoenell}, W. and {Sodr{\\'e}}, Jr., L. and {Seagal Collaboration}},\n title = \"{Can retired galaxies mimic active galaxies? Clues from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {stars: AGB and post-AGB, galaxies: active, galaxies: general, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = nov,\n volume = {391},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L29-L33},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00550.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0809.1341},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.391L..29S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Schawinski07,\n author = {{Schawinski}, Kevin and {Thomas}, Daniel and {Sarzi}, Marc and {Maraston}, Claudia and {Kaviraj}, Sugata and {Joo}, Seok-Joo and {Yi}, Sukyoung K. and {Silk}, Joseph},\n title = \"{Observational evidence for AGN feedback in early-type galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = dec,\n volume = {382},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1415-1431},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12487.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0709.3015},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.382.1415S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Mac99,\n author = {{Mac Low}, Mordecai-Mark and {Ferrara}, Andrea},\n title = \"{Starburst-driven Mass Loss from Dwarf Galaxies: Efficiency and Metal Ejection}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: EVOLUTION, GALAXIES: STARBURST, GALAXIES: STELLAR CONTENT, HYDRODYNAMICS, STARS: SUPERNOVAE: GENERAL, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Starburst, Galaxies: Stellar Content, Hydrodynamics, Stars: Supernovae: General, Astrophysics},\n year = 1999,\n month = mar,\n volume = {513},\n number = {1},\n pages = {142-155},\n doi = {10.1086/306832},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9801237},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...513..142M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Toomre72,\n author = {{Toomre}, Alar and {Toomre}, Juri},\n title = \"{Galactic Bridges and Tails}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1972,\n month = dec,\n volume = {178},\n pages = {623-666},\n doi = {10.1086/151823},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972ApJ...178..623T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Mould00,\n author = {{Mould}, Jeremy R. and {Huchra}, John P. and {Freedman}, Wendy L. and {Kennicutt}, Jr., Robert C. and {Ferrarese}, Laura and {Ford}, Holland C. and {Gibson}, Brad K. and {Graham}, John A. and {Hughes}, Shaun M.~G. and {Illingworth}, Garth D. and {Kelson}, Daniel D. and {Macri}, Lucas M. and {Madore}, Barry F. and {Sakai}, Shoko and {Sebo}, Kim M. and {Silbermann}, Nancy A. and {Stetson}, Peter B.},\n title = \"{The Hubble Space Telescope Key Project on the Extragalactic Distance Scale. XXVIII. Combining the Constraints on the Hubble Constant}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {STARS: VARIABLES: CEPHEIDS, COSMOLOGY: OBSERVATIONS, COSMOLOGY: DISTANCE SCALE, GALAXIES: DISTANCES AND REDSHIFTS, Stars: Variables: Cepheids, Cosmology: Observations, Cosmology: Distance Scale, Galaxies: Distances and Redshifts, Astrophysics},\n year = 2000,\n month = feb,\n volume = {529},\n number = {2},\n pages = {786-794},\n doi = {10.1086/308304},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9909260},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...529..786M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Presotto10,\n author = {{Presotto}, V. and {Iovino}, A. and {Pompei}, E. and {Temporin}, S.},\n title = \"{SCG0018-4854: a young and dynamic compact group. I. Kinematical analyses}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: clusters: individual: SCG 0018-4854, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2010,\n month = feb,\n volume = {510},\n eid = {A31},\n pages = {A31},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/200912882},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0910.4978},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...510A..31P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Torres-Flores09,\n author = {{Torres-Flores}, S. and {Mendes de Oliveira}, C. and {de Mello}, D.~F. and {Amram}, P. and {Plana}, H. and {Epinat}, B. and {Iglesias-P{\\'a}ramo}, J.},\n title = \"{Star formation in the intragroup medium and other diagnostics of the evolutionary stages of compact groups of galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: intergalactic medium, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = nov,\n volume = {507},\n number = {2},\n pages = {723-746},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/200911878},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0908.2798},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...507..723T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Pompei07,\n author = {{Pompei}, E. and {Dahlem}, M. and {Iovino}, A.},\n title = \"{Optical and radio survey of southern compact groups of galaxies. I. Pilot study of six groups}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: interactions, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: general, galaxies: intergalactic medium, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = oct,\n volume = {473},\n number = {2},\n pages = {399-409},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20077140},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0708.0076},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...473..399P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Mendes-de-Oliveira94,\n author = {{Mendes de Oliveira}, Claudia and {Hickson}, Paul},\n title = \"{Morphology of Galaxies in Compact Groups}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Astronomical Photometry, Galactic Clusters, Galactic Structure, Interacting Galaxies, Morphology, Collisions, Elliptical Galaxies, Galactic Evolution, Galactic Rotation, Irregular Galaxies, Isophotes, Astrophysics, GALAXIES: CLUSTERING, GALAXIES: INTERACTIONS, GALAXIES: PHOTOMETRY, GALAXIES: STRUCTURE},\n year = 1994,\n month = jun,\n volume = {427},\n pages = {684},\n doi = {10.1086/174175},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...427..684M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Coziol07,\n author = {{Coziol}, R. and {Plauchu-Frayn}, I.},\n title = \"{Evidence for Tidal Interactions and Mergers as the Origin of Galaxy Morphology Evolution in Compact Groups}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: interactions, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = jun,\n volume = {133},\n number = {6},\n pages = {2630-2642},\n doi = {10.1086/513514},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0702287},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AJ....133.2630C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Behroozi13,\n author = {{Behroozi}, Peter S. and {Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Conroy}, Charlie},\n title = \"{The Average Star Formation Histories of Galaxies in Dark Matter Halos from z = 0-8}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark matter, galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = jun,\n volume = {770},\n number = {1},\n eid = {57},\n pages = {57},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/57},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1207.6105},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...770...57B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Madau14,\n author = {{Madau}, Piero and {Dickinson}, Mark},\n title = \"{Cosmic Star-Formation History}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = aug,\n volume = {52},\n pages = {415-486},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1403.0007},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ARA&A..52..415M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Boyett22,\n author = {{Boyett}, Kristan N.~K. and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {Bunker}, Andrew J. and {Tang}, Mengtao and {Maseda}, Michael V.},\n title = \"{The [O III]{\\ensuremath{\\lambda}}5007 equivalent width distribution at z 2: the redshift evolution of the extreme emission line galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = jul,\n volume = {513},\n number = {3},\n pages = {4451-4463},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac1109},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2110.15858},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.4451B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{Temporin05,\n author = {{Temporin}, S. and {Ciroi}, S. and {Iovino}, A. and {Pompei}, E. and {Radovich}, M. and {Rafanelli}, P.},\n title = \"{Star formation in three nearby galaxy systems}\",\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n booktitle = {Starbursts: From 30 Doradus to Lyman Break Galaxies},\n year = 2005,\n editor = {{de Grijs}, R. and {Gonz{\\'a}lez Delgado}, R.~M.},\n series = {Astrophysics and Space Science Library},\n volume = {329},\n month = may,\n pages = {P78},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0411405},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0411405},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ASSL..329P..78T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Trinchieri08,\n author = {{Trinchieri}, G. and {Iovino}, A. and {Pompei}, E. and {Dahlem}, M. and {Reeves}, J. and {Coziol}, R. and {Temporin}, S.},\n title = \"{Detection of a hot intergalactic medium in the spiral-only compact group SCG0018-4854}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: intergalactic medium, X-rays: galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = jun,\n volume = {484},\n number = {1},\n pages = {195-203},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:200809487},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0804.0351},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...484..195T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Danks81,\n author = {{Danks}, A.~C. and {Alcaino}, G.},\n title = \"{Interactions in two contrasting examples of galactic groups.}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {Astronomical Photography, Galactic Clusters, Gravitational Effects, Astronomical Catalogs, Colorimetry, Elliptical Galaxies, Ring Galaxies, Spiral Galaxies, Astronomy},\n year = 1981,\n month = may,\n volume = {98},\n pages = {223-229},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981A&A....98..223D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Keshri25a,\n author = {{Keshri}, Saili and {Barway}, Sudhanshu and {Das}, Mousumi and {Yadav}, Jyoti and {Combes}, Fran{\\c{c}}oise},\n title = \"{Unveiling the kinematics of a central region in the triple-AGN host NGC 7733-7734 interacting group}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: bulges, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: individual: NGC 7733, galaxies: individual: NGC 7734, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = mar,\n volume = {695},\n eid = {A39},\n pages = {A39},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202451373},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2501.08544},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...695A..39K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Keshri25b,\n author = {{Keshri}, Saili and {Barway}, Sudhanshu and {Combes}, Fran{\\c{c}}oise},\n title = \"{Kinematics of the lens host S0 galaxy NGC 1553: Role of secular processes}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: individual: NGC 1553, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = nov,\n volume = {703},\n eid = {A114},\n pages = {A114},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202556344},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2509.09902},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...703A.114K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Peng02,\n author = {{Peng}, Chien Y. and {Ho}, Luis C. and {Impey}, Chris D. and {Rix}, Hans-Walter},\n title = \"{Detailed Structural Decomposition of Galaxy Images}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Bulges, Galaxies: Fundamental Parameters, Galaxies: Nuclei, Galaxies: Structure, Techniques: Image Processing, Techniques: Photometric, Astrophysics},\n year = 2002,\n month = jul,\n volume = {124},\n number = {1},\n pages = {266-293},\n doi = {10.1086/340952},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0204182},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....124..266P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Chayan24,\n author = {{Mondal}, Chayan and {Barway}, Sudhanshu},\n title = \"{Unravelling the post-collision properties of the Cartwheel galaxy: A MUSE exploration of its bar and inner region}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: individual: Cartwheel or ESO 350-G040, galaxies: structure, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jan,\n volume = {681},\n eid = {A53},\n pages = {A53},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202347560},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2310.00584},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681A..53M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Chayan25,\n author = {{Mondal}, Chayan and {Barway}, Sudhanshu},\n title = \"{Discovery of a kinematically distinct component in the central region of the collisional ring galaxy AM0644-741}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: bulges, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = jun,\n volume = {698},\n eid = {L25},\n pages = {L25},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202451984},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2505.21352},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...698L..25M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Sutherland15,\n author = {{Sutherland}, Will and {Emerson}, Jim and {Dalton}, Gavin and {Atad-Ettedgui}, Eli and {Beard}, Steven and {Bennett}, Richard and {Bezawada}, Naidu and {Born}, Andrew and {Caldwell}, Martin and {Clark}, Paul and {Craig}, Simon and {Henry}, David and {Jeffers}, Paul and {Little}, Bryan and {McPherson}, Alistair and {Murray}, John and {Stewart}, Malcolm and {Stobie}, Brian and {Terrett}, David and {Ward}, Kim and {Whalley}, Martin and {Woodhouse}, Guy},\n title = \"{The Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA): Design, technical overview, and performance}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {telescopes, instrumentation: photometers, instrumentation: miscellaneous, instrumentation: detectors, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = mar,\n volume = {575},\n eid = {A25},\n pages = {A25},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201424973},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1409.4780},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...575A..25S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Barnes85,\n author = {{Barnes}, J.},\n title = \"{The dynamical state of groups of galaxies.}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Celestial Mechanics, Galactic Evolution, Astronomical Models, Computational Astrophysics, Trajectories, Virial Theorem, Astrophysics},\n year = 1985,\n month = aug,\n volume = {215},\n pages = {517-536},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/215.3.517},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985MNRAS.215..517B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Governato96,\n author = {{Governato}, F. and {Tozzi}, P. and {Cavaliere}, A.},\n title = \"{Small Groups of Galaxies: A Clue to a Critical Universe}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {COSMOLOGY: THEORY, GALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERAL, GALAXIES: INTERACTIONS, Astrophysics},\n year = 1996,\n month = feb,\n volume = {458},\n pages = {18},\n doi = {10.1086/176789},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9508152},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...458...18G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Torres-Flores14,\n author = {{Torres-Flores}, S. and {Scarano}, S. and {Mendes de Oliveira}, C. and {de Mello}, D.~F. and {Amram}, P. and {Plana}, H.},\n title = \"{Star-forming regions and the metallicity gradients in the tidal tails: the case of NGC 92}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: abundances, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: star clusters: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = feb,\n volume = {438},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1894-1908},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt2340},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1312.0812},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438.1894T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Das06,\n author = {{Das}, V. and {Crenshaw}, D.~M. and {Kraemer}, S.~B. and {Deo}, R.~P.},\n title = \"{Kinematics of the Narrow-Line Region in the Seyfert 2 Galaxy NGC 1068: Dynamical Effects of the Radio Jet}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {galaxies: individual (NGC 1068), Galaxies: Kinematics and Dynamics, Galaxies: Seyfert, Ultraviolet: Galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = aug,\n volume = {132},\n number = {2},\n pages = {620-632},\n doi = {10.1086/504899},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0603803},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....132..620D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{McDermid07,\n author = {{McDermid}, R.~M. and {Emsellem}, E. and {Shapiro}, K.~L. and {Bacon}, R. and {Bureau}, M. and {Cappellari}, M. and {Davies}, R.~L. and {de Zeeuw}, P.~T. and {Falc{\\'o}n-Barroso}, J. and {Krajnovi{\\'c}}, D. and {Kuntschner}, H. and {Peletier}, R.~F. and {Sarzi}, M.},\n title = \"{Young Kinematically Decoupled Components in Early-Type Galaxies}\",\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n booktitle = {Science Perspectives for 3D Spectroscopy},\n year = 2007,\n editor = {{Kissler-Patig}, Markus and {Walsh}, Jeremy R. and {Roth}, Martin M.},\n month = jan,\n pages = {253},\n doi = {10.1007/978-3-540-73491-8_40},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0602318},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007spts.conf..253M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Jin16,\n author = {{Jin}, Yifei and {Chen}, Yanmei and {Shi}, Yong and {Tremonti}, C.~A. and {Bershady}, M.~A. and {Merrifield}, M. and {Emsellem}, E. and {Fu}, Hai and {Wake}, D. and {Bundy}, K. and {Lin}, Lihwai and {Argudo-Fernandez}, M. and {Huang}, Song and {Stark}, D.~V. and {Storchi-Bergmann}, T. and {Bizyaev}, D. and {Brownstein}, J. and {Chisholm}, J. and {Guo}, Qi and {Hao}, Lei and {Hu}, Jian and {Li}, Cheng and {Li}, Ran and {Masters}, K.~L. and {Malanushenko}, E. and {Pan}, Kaike and {Riffel}, R.~A. and {Roman-Lopes}, A. and {Simmons}, A. and {Thomas}, D. and {Wang}, Lan and {Westfall}, K. and {Yan}, Renbin},\n title = \"{SDSS-IV MaNGA: properties of galaxies with kinematically decoupled stellar and gaseous components}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Galaxy: abundances, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: stellar content, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = nov,\n volume = {463},\n number = {1},\n pages = {913-926},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw2055},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1611.00528},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.463..913J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Zhou22,\n author = {{Zhou}, Yuren and {Chen}, Yanmei and {Shi}, Yong and {Bizyaev}, Dmitry and {Guo}, Hong and {Bao}, Min and {Xu}, Haitong and {Yu}, Xiaoling and {Brownstein}, Joel R.},\n title = \"{SDSS-IV MaNGA: global properties of kinematically misaligned galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = oct,\n volume = {515},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5081-5093},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac2016},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2207.07487},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.5081Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{Zinchenko23,\n author = {{Zinchenko}, I.~A.},\n title = \"{Gas and stellar kinematic misalignment in MaNGA galaxies: What is the origin of counter-rotating gas?}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {ISM: abundances, galaxies: evolution, HII regions, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = jun,\n volume = {674},\n eid = {L7},\n pages = {L7},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202346846},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2305.13387},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674L...7Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Bryant19,\n author = {{Bryant}, J.~J. and {Croom}, S.~M. and {van de Sande}, J. and {Scott}, N. and {Fogarty}, L.~M.~R. and {Bland-Hawthorn}, J. and {Bloom}, J.~V. and {Taylor}, E.~N. and {Brough}, S. and {Robotham}, A. and {Cortese}, L. and {Couch}, W. and {Owers}, M.~S. and {Medling}, A.~M. and {Federrath}, C. and {Bekki}, K. and {Richards}, S.~N. and {Lawrence}, J.~S. and {Konstantopoulos}, I.~S.},\n title = \"{The SAMI Galaxy Survey: stellar and gas misalignments and the origin of gas in nearby galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {techniques: imaging spectroscopy, surveys, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = feb,\n volume = {483},\n number = {1},\n pages = {458-479},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty3122},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1811.09298},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483..458B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Ristea22,\n author = {{Ristea}, A. and {Cortese}, L. and {Fraser-McKelvie}, A. and {Brough}, S. and {Bryant}, J.~J. and {Catinella}, B. and {Croom}, S.~M. and {Groves}, B. and {Richards}, S.~N. and {van de Sande}, J. and {Bland-Hawthorn}, J. and {Owers}, M.~S. and {Lawrence}, J.~S.},\n title = \"{The SAMI Galaxy Survey: physical drivers of stellar-gas kinematic misalignments in the nearby Universe}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: general, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = dec,\n volume = {517},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2677-2696},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac2839},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2210.01147},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517.2677R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{van-de-Voort15,\n author = {{van de Voort}, Freeke and {Davis}, Timothy A. and {Kere{\\v{s}}}, Du{\\v{s}}an and {Quataert}, Eliot and {Faucher-Gigu{\\`e}re}, Claude-Andr{\\'e} and {Hopkins}, Philip F.},\n title = \"{The creation and persistence of a misaligned gas disc in a simulated early-type galaxy}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = aug,\n volume = {451},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3269-3277},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv1217},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1504.03685},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.3269V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Lynds76,\n author = {{Lynds}, R. and {Toomre}, A.},\n title = \"{On the interpretation of ring galaxies: the binary ring system II Hz 4.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1976,\n month = oct,\n volume = {209},\n pages = {382-388},\n doi = {10.1086/154730},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...209..382L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{Toomre78,\n author = {{Toomre}, A.},\n title = \"{Interacting Systems}\",\n keywords = {Computerized Simulation, Galactic Clusters, Galactic Structure, Spiral Galaxies, Galactic Rotation, Gravitational Effects, Gravitational Fields, Velocity Distribution, Astrophysics},\n booktitle = {Large Scale Structures in the Universe},\n year = 1978,\n editor = {{Longair}, M.~S. and {Einasto}, J.},\n series = {IAU Symposium},\n volume = {79},\n month = jan,\n pages = {109},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978IAUS...79..109T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Theys76,\n author = {{Theys}, J.~C. and {Spiegel}, E.~A.},\n title = \"{Ring galaxies. I.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Astronomical Models, Elliptical Galaxies, Galactic Structure, Ring Galaxies, Spiral Galaxies, Astronomical Spectroscopy, Classifications, Galactic Nuclei, Radial Velocity, Three Dimensional Models, Ubv Spectra, Visual Photometry, Astrophysics},\n year = 1976,\n month = sep,\n volume = {208},\n pages = {650-661},\n doi = {10.1086/154646},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...208..650T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Boselli96,\n author = {{Boselli}, A. and {Mendes de Oliveira}, C. and {Balkowski}, C. and {Cayatte}, V. and {Casoli}, F.},\n title = \"{The molecular gas content of spiral galaxies in compact groups.}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: EVOLUTION, GALAXIES: INTERACTION, GALAXIES: SPIRAL, GALAXIES: ISM, RADIO LINES: GALAXIES},\n year = 1996,\n month = oct,\n volume = {314},\n pages = {738-744},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&A...314..738B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Bomans97,\n author = {{Bomans}, Dominik J. and {Chu}, You-Hua and {Hopp}, Ulrich},\n title = \"{Hot Interstellar Gas in the Irregular Galaxy NGC 4449}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n year = 1997,\n month = may,\n volume = {113},\n pages = {1678-1690},\n doi = {10.1086/118384},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9702121},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997AJ....113.1678B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Strickland04,\n author = {{Strickland}, David K. and {Heckman}, Timothy M. and {Colbert}, Edward J.~M. and {Hoopes}, Charles G. and {Weaver}, Kimberly A.},\n title = \"{A High Spatial Resolution X-Ray and H{\\ensuremath{\\alpha}} Study of Hot Gas in the Halos of Star-forming Disk Galaxies. I. Spatial and Spectral Properties of the Diffuse X-Ray Emission}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Halos, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 253, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 891, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 1482, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 3034, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 3073, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 3079, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 3628, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 4244, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 4631, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 4945, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 6503, Galaxies: Starburst, ISM: Bubbles, ISM: Jets and Outflows, X-Rays: Galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = apr,\n volume = {151},\n number = {2},\n pages = {193-236},\n doi = {10.1086/382214},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0306592},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJS..151..193S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Zhang24,\n author = {{Zhang}, He-Shou and {Ponti}, Gabriele and {Carretti}, Ettore and {Liu}, Ruo-Yu and {Morris}, Mark R. and {Haverkorn}, Marijke and {Locatelli}, Nicola and {Zheng}, Xueying and {Aharonian}, Felix and {Zhang}, Hai-Ming and {Zhang}, Yi and {Stel}, Giovanni and {Strong}, Andrew and {Yeung}, Michael C.~H. and {Merloni}, Andrea},\n title = \"{A magnetized Galactic halo from inner Galaxy outflows}\",\n journal = {Nature Astronomy},\n keywords = {Astrophysics of Galaxies, High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2024,\n month = nov,\n volume = {8},\n pages = {1416-1428},\n doi = {10.1038/s41550-024-02362-0},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2408.06312},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024NatAs...8.1416Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Bittner2020,\n author = {{Bittner}, Adrian and {S{\\'a}nchez-Bl{\\'a}zquez}, Patricia and {Gadotti}, Dimitri A. and {Neumann}, Justus and {Fragkoudi}, Francesca and {Coelho}, Paula and {de Lorenzo-C{\\'a}ceres}, Adriana and {Falc{\\'o}n-Barroso}, Jes{\\'u}s and {Kim}, Taehyun and {Leaman}, Ryan and {Mart{\\'\\i}n-Navarro}, Ignacio and {M{\\'e}ndez-Abreu}, Jairo and {P{\\'e}rez}, Isabel and {Querejeta}, Miguel and {Seidel}, Marja K. and {van de Ven}, Glenn},\n title = \"{Inside-out formation of nuclear discs and the absence of old central spheroids in barred galaxies of the TIMER survey}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: spiral, galaxies: stellar content, galaxies: structure, galaxies: bulges, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = nov,\n volume = {643},\n eid = {A65},\n pages = {A65},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202038450},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2009.01856},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A..65B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Gadotti19,\n author = {{Gadotti}, Dimitri A. and {S{\\'a}nchez-Bl{\\'a}zquez}, Patricia and {Falc{\\'o}n-Barroso}, Jes{\\'u}s and {Husemann}, Bernd and {Seidel}, Marja K. and {P{\\'e}rez}, Isabel and {de Lorenzo-C{\\'a}ceres}, Adriana and {Martinez-Valpuesta}, Inma and {Fragkoudi}, Francesca and {Leung}, Gigi and {van de Ven}, Glenn and {Leaman}, Ryan and {Coelho}, Paula and {Martig}, Marie and {Kim}, Taehyun and {Neumann}, Justus and {Querejeta}, Miguel},\n title = \"{Time Inference with MUSE in Extragalactic Rings (TIMER): properties of the survey and high-level data products}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: ISM, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: stellar content, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = jan,\n volume = {482},\n number = {1},\n pages = {506-529},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty2666},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1810.01425},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482..506G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Gadotti20,\n author = {{Gadotti}, Dimitri A. and {Bittner}, Adrian and {Falc{\\'o}n-Barroso}, Jes{\\'u}s and {M{\\'e}ndez-Abreu}, Jairo and {Kim}, Taehyun and {Fragkoudi}, Francesca and {de Lorenzo-C{\\'a}ceres}, Adriana and {Leaman}, Ryan and {Neumann}, Justus and {Querejeta}, Miguel and {S{\\'a}nchez-Bl{\\'a}zquez}, Patricia and {Martig}, Marie and {Mart{\\'\\i}n-Navarro}, Ignacio and {P{\\'e}rez}, Isabel and {Seidel}, Marja K. and {van de Ven}, Glenn},\n title = \"{Kinematic signatures of nuclear discs and bar-driven secular evolution in nearby galaxies of the MUSE TIMER project}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: bulges, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: photometry, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = nov,\n volume = {643},\n eid = {A14},\n pages = {A14},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202038448},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2009.01852},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A..14G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Corsini12,\n author = {{Corsini}, E.~M. and {M{\\'e}ndez-Abreu}, J. and {Pastorello}, N. and {Dalla Bont{\\`a}}, E. and {Morelli}, L. and {Beifiori}, A. and {Pizzella}, A. and {Bertola}, F.},\n title = \"{Polar bulges and polar nuclear discs: the case of NGC 4698}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: bulges, galaxies: formation, galaxies: individual: NGC 4698, galaxies: photometry, galaxies: spiral, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = jun,\n volume = {423},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L79-L83},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01261.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1204.2265},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423L..79C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Mayer08,\n author = {{Mayer}, L. and {Kazantzidis}, S. and {Escala}, A.},\n title = \"{Formation of Nuclear Disks and Supermassive Black Hole Binaries in Galaxy Mergers}\",\n journal = {\\memsai},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Mergers, Galaxies: Structure, Black Holes: Evolution, Black Holes: Binaries, Cosmology: Theory, Methods: Numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = jan,\n volume = {79},\n pages = {1284},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.0807.3329},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0807.3329},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MmSAI..79.1284M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Salim18,\n author = {{Salim}, Samir and {Boquien}, M{\\'e}d{\\'e}ric and {Lee}, Janice C.},\n title = \"{Dust Attenuation Curves in the Local Universe: Demographics and New Laws for Star-forming Galaxies and High-redshift Analogs}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dust, extinction, galaxies: fundamental parameters, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = may,\n volume = {859},\n number = {1},\n eid = {11},\n pages = {11},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aabf3c},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1804.05850},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859...11S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Salim16,\n author = {{Salim}, Samir and {Lee}, Janice C. and {Janowiecki}, Steven and {da Cunha}, Elisabete and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Boquien}, M{\\'e}d{\\'e}ric and {Burgarella}, Denis and {Salzer}, John J. and {Charlot}, St{\\'e}phane},\n title = \"{GALEX-SDSS-WISE Legacy Catalog (GSWLC): Star Formation Rates, Stellar Masses, and Dust Attenuations of 700,000 Low-redshift Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = nov,\n volume = {227},\n number = {1},\n eid = {2},\n pages = {2},\n doi = {10.3847/0067-0049/227/1/2},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1610.00712},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..227....2S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Iovino02,\n author = {{Iovino}, Angela},\n title = \"{Detecting Fainter Compact Groups: Results from a New Automated Algorithm}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Clusters: General, Galaxies: Interactions},\n year = 2002,\n month = nov,\n volume = {124},\n number = {5},\n pages = {2471-2489},\n doi = {10.1086/343059},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....124.2471I},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Zheng21,\n author = {{Zheng}, Yun-Liang and {Shen}, Shi-Yin},\n title = \"{Compact Groups of Galaxies in Sloan Digital Sky Survey and LAMOST Spectral Survey. II. Dynamical Properties of Isolated and Embedded Groups}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy groups, Hickson compact group, 597, 729, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = apr,\n volume = {911},\n number = {2},\n eid = {105},\n pages = {105},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/abeaa2},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2102.12804},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...911..105Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Beers90,\n author = {{Beers}, Timothy C. and {Flynn}, Kevin and {Gebhardt}, Karl},\n title = \"{Measures of Location and Scale for Velocities in Clusters of Galaxies---A Robust Approach}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Galactic Clusters, Position (Location), Radial Velocity, Robustness (Mathematics), Astronomical Coordinates, Normal Density Functions, Velocity Distribution, Astrophysics, GALAXIES: CLUSTERING},\n year = 1990,\n month = jul,\n volume = {100},\n pages = {32},\n doi = {10.1086/115487},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990AJ....100...32B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Montaguth25,\n author = {{Montaguth}, Gissel P. and {Monachesi}, Antonela and {Torres-Flores}, Sergio and {G{\\'o}mez}, Facundo A. and {Lima-Dias}, Ciria and {Cortesi}, Arianna and {Mendes de Oliveira}, Claudia and {Telles}, Eduardo and {Panda}, Swayamtrupta and {Grossi}, Marco and {Lopes}, Paulo A.~A. and {O'Mill}, Ana Laura and {Hernandez-Jimenez}, Jose A. and {Olave-Rojas}, Daniela E. and {Demarco}, Ricardo and {Kanaan}, Antonio and {Ribeiro}, Tiago and {Schoenell}, William},\n title = \"{Galaxy evolution in compact groups: II. Witnessing the influence of major structures in their evolution}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: groups: general, galaxies: interactions, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = apr,\n volume = {696},\n eid = {A240},\n pages = {A240},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202451198},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2406.14671},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...696A.240M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Jin23,\n author = {{Jin}, Shuowen and {Sillassen}, Nikolaj B. and {Magdis}, Georgios E. and {Vijayan}, Aswin P. and {Brammer}, Gabriel B. and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Weaver}, John R. and {Gobat}, Raphael and {Gim{\\'e}nez-Arteaga}, Clara and {Valentino}, Francesco and {Brinch}, Malte and {G{\\'o}mez-Guijarro}, Carlos and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Toft}, Sune and {Greve}, Thomas R. and {Blanquez Sese}, David},\n title = \"{Massive galaxy formation caught in action at z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 5 with JWST}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {Galaxy: formation, Galaxy: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, infrared: galaxies, galaxies: groups: individual: CGG-z5, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = feb,\n volume = {670},\n eid = {L11},\n pages = {L11},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202245724},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2212.09372},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...670L..11J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Wei26,\n author = {{Wei}, Xiaoyang and {Cai}, Zheng and {Yu}, Fujiang and {Li}, Mingyu and {Wu}, Yunjing},\n title = \"{Pre-Virialized Assembly at Cosmic Dawn: The Dynamics and Extreme Ionization of Compact Group CGG-z7 at $z\\sim7.04$}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2026,\n month = mar,\n eid = {arXiv:2603.08066},\n pages = {arXiv:2603.08066},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2603.08066},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2603.08066},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260308066W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Jyoti23,\n author = {{Yadav}, Jyoti and {Das}, Mousumi and {Barway}, Sudhanshu and {Combes}, Francoise},\n title = \"{An FUV and optical study of star formation in closely interacting galaxies: star-forming rings, tidal arms, and nuclear outflows}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: formation, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = nov,\n volume = {526},\n number = {1},\n pages = {198-216},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad2672},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2308.16152},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526..198Y},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@article{yang05,\n author = {Yang, Xiaohu and Mo, H. J. and van den Bosch, Frank C. and Jing, Y. P.},\n title = {A halo-based galaxy group finder: calibration and application to the 2dFGRS},\n journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},\n volume = {356},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1293-1307},\n year = {2005},\n month = {02},\n issn = {0035-8711},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08560.x},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08560.x},\n eprint = {https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/356/4/1293/3296536/356-4-1293.pdf},\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Eke04,\n author = {{Eke}, V.~R. and {Baugh}, Carlton M. and {Cole}, Shaun and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {Norberg}, Peder and {Peacock}, John A. and {Baldry}, Ivan K. and {Bland-Hawthorn}, Joss and {Bridges}, Terry and {Cannon}, Russell and {Colless}, Matthew and {Collins}, Chris and {Couch}, Warrick and {Dalton}, Gavin and {de Propris}, Roberto and {Driver}, Simon P. and {Efstathiou}, George and {Ellis}, Richard S. and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Jackson}, Carole and {Lahav}, Ofer and {Lewis}, Ian and {Lumsden}, Stuart and {Maddox}, Steve and {Madgwick}, Darren and {Peterson}, Bruce A. and {Sutherland}, Will and {Taylor}, Keith},\n title = \"{Galaxy groups in the 2dFGRS: the group-finding algorithm and the 2PIGG catalogue}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {catalogues, galaxies: clusters: general, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = mar,\n volume = {348},\n number = {3},\n pages = {866-878},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07408.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0402567},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.348..866E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: aa.cls\n================================================\n%%\n%% This is file `aa.cls',\n%% generated with the docstrip utility.\n%%\n%% The original source files were:\n%%\n%% aa.dtx (with options: `aa')\n%% \n%% aa.dtx\n%% Copyright EDP Sciences, E-press (2016), J.-C. Charpentier (2010), all rights reserved.\n%% Class `aa' to use with LaTeX 2e\n%% \\CharacterTable\n%% {Upper-case \\A\\B\\C\\D\\E\\F\\G\\H\\I\\J\\K\\L\\M\\N\\O\\P\\Q\\R\\S\\T\\U\\V\\W\\X\\Y\\Z\n%% Lower-case \\a\\b\\c\\d\\e\\f\\g\\h\\i\\j\\k\\l\\m\\n\\o\\p\\q\\r\\s\\t\\u\\v\\w\\x\\y\\z\n%% Digits \\0\\1\\2\\3\\4\\5\\6\\7\\8\\9\n%% Exclamation \\! Double quote \\\" Hash (number) \\#\n%% Dollar \\$ Percent \\% Ampersand \\&\n%% Acute accent \\' Left paren \\( Right paren \\)\n%% Asterisk \\* Plus \\+ Comma \\,\n%% Minus \\- Point \\. Solidus \\/\n%% Colon \\: Semicolon \\; Less than \\<\n%% Equals \\= Greater than \\> Question mark \\?\n%% Commercial at \\@ Left bracket \\[ Backslash \\\\\n%% Right bracket \\] Circumflex \\^ Underscore \\_\n%% Grave accent \\` Left brace \\{ Vertical bar \\|\n%% Right brace \\} Tilde \\~}\n%%\n\\def\\filedate{2016/09/01}\n\\let\\aafiledate\\filedate\n\\def\\fileversion{9.1}\n\\let\\aafileversion\\fileversion\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1995/06/01]\n\\ProvidesClass{aa}\n [\\filedate{} v\\fileversion{} Class for AA journal]\n\\LoadClass[fleqn]{article}\n\\newif\\ifaa@letter\n\\DeclareOption{letter}{\\aa@lettertrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@onlletter\n\\DeclareOption{onlletter}{\\aa@onllettertrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@online\n\\DeclareOption{online}{\\aa@onlinetrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@referee\n\\DeclareOption{referee}{\\aa@refereetrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@contents\n\\DeclareOption{contents}{\\aa@contentstrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@contentsAut\n\\DeclareOption{contentsAut}{\\aa@contentsAuttrue}\n\\newlength\\aa@fullwidth\n\\newlength\\aa@fullheight\n\\DeclareOption{a4paper}{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@paper{a4paper}%\n \\setlength\\aa@fullwidth{184mm}%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@leftmarginpaper{(21cm-\\aa@fullwidth)/2}%\n \\setlength\\aa@fullheight{705pt}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{letterpaper}{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@paper{letterpaper}\n \\setlength\\aa@fullwidth{184mm}%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@leftmarginpaper{(8.5in-\\aa@fullwidth)/2}%\n \\setlength\\aa@fullheight{705pt-1.76cm}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{legalpaper}{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@paper{legalpaper}%\n \\setlength\\aa@fullwidth{184mm}%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@leftmarginpaper{(8.5in-\\aa@fullwidth)/2}%\n \\setlength\\aa@fullheight{705pt}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@paper{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@leftmarginpaper{}\n\\newif\\ifaa@twocolumn\n\\DeclareOption{onecolumn}{%\n \\aa@twocolumnfalse\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@column{onecolumn}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{twocolumn}{%\n \\aa@twocolumntrue\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@column{twocolumn}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@column{}\n\\newif\\if@wideboxfn\n\\@wideboxfnfalse\n\\DeclareOption{wideboxfn}{\\@wideboxfntrue}\n%\n\\newif\\ifaa@longfn\n\\DeclareOption{longfn}{\\aa@longfntrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@longauth\n\\DeclareOption{longauth}{\\aa@longauthtrue}\n\\let\\if@myobjects\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{ascii}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[ascii]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{latin1}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[latin1]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{latin9}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[latin9]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{ansinews}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[ansinews]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{applemac}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[applemac]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{utf8}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[utf8]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@font{}\n\\DeclareOption{cm}{%\n \\def\\aa@font{%\n \\RequirePackage{textcomp}%\n }%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{showoverfull}{\\setlength\\overfullrule{5\\p@}}\n\\DeclareOption{hideoverfull}{\\setlength\\overfullrule{\\z@}}\n\\DeclareOption{openbib}{%\n \\AtEndOfPackage{%\n \\renewcommand\\@openbib@code{%\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\bibindent\n \\itemindent -\\bibindent\n \\listparindent \\itemindent\n \\parsep \\z@\n }%\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\par}}%\n}\n\\newif\\ifaa@bibnumber\n\\DeclareOption{bibnumber}{\\aa@bibnumbertrue%\n \\def\\aa@biblio{%\n \\RequirePackage[sort&compress]{natbib}\n \\bibpunct{[}{]}{,}{n}{}{,}%\n \\def\\@biblabel##1{##1.}%\n \\bibliographystyle{plainnat}%\n \\def\\bibfont{\\aa@bibliographyfont}%\n \\setlength{\\bibsep}{\\z@}%\n }\n}\n\\DeclareOption{bibauthoryear}{%\n \\def\\aa@biblio{%\n \\RequirePackage{natbib}\n \\bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}%\n \\def\\bibfont{\\aa@bibliographyfont}%\n \\setlength{\\bibsep}{\\z@}%\n }%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{bibyear}{%\n \\def\\aa@biblio{%\n \\def\\@biblabel##1{}%\n \\def\\@cite##1##2{{##1\\if@tempswa , ##2\\fi}}%\n }\n}\n\\ExecuteOptions{a4paper,twocolumn,utf8,hideoverfull,bibauthoryear}\n\\ProcessOptions\n\\RequirePackage{calc}\n\\RequirePackage{etex}\n\\RequirePackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\\aa@inputenc\n\\aa@font\n\\ifaa@referee\n\\RequirePackage{xcolor}\n\\RequirePackage{marginnote}\n\\AtEndOfClass{\n\\setlength{\\marginparwidth}{50mm}\n\\setlength{\\marginparsep}{5mm}\n}\n%\n\\newcounter{lenote}\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n\\@ifpackageloaded{hyperref}%\n{\\newcommand{\\LEm}[1]{\\texorpdfstring{\\protect\\stepcounter{lenote}{\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}] }}\n\\protect\\marginnote{\\baselineskip3ex{\\normalsize{\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}: #1]}}}}}{}}\n\\newcommand{\\LEt}[1]{\\texorpdfstring{\\protect\\stepcounter{lenote}\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}: #1] }}{}}}%\n{\\newcommand{\\LEm}[1]{\\protect\\stepcounter{lenote}{\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}] }}\n\\protect\\marginnote{\\baselineskip3ex{\\normalsize{\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}: #1]}}}}}\n\\newcommand{\\LEt}[1]{\\protect\\stepcounter{lenote}\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}: #1] }}}%\n}\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@column{onecolumn}\n \\aa@twocolumnfalse\n \\setlength{\\aa@fullwidth}{0.75\\aa@fullwidth}\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@leftmarginpaper{15mm}\n \\if!\\csname appendix\\endcsname!\\AtEndDocument{\\listofobjects}\\fi\n\\fi\n\\ifx\\pdfoutput\\undefined\n \\newcount\\pdfoutput\n\\fi\n\\ifnum\\pdfoutput=\\z@\n \\newcommand\\aa@driver{dvips}\n\\else\n \\newcommand\\aa@driver{pdftex}\n\\fi\n\\RequirePackage[\\aa@driver, \\aa@paper, left=\\aa@leftmarginpaper,\n \\ifaa@twocolumn\\aa@column\\fi, \\ifaa@referee\\else twoside,\\fi\n textheight=\\aa@fullheight,headheight=12pt,headsep=12pt,\n footskip=20pt,\n textwidth=\\aa@fullwidth, columnsep=4mm,\n marginpar=0in, marginparsep=0in]{geometry}\n\\RequirePackage{setspace}\n\\ifaa@referee\n \\doublespacing\n\\fi\n\\RequirePackage{fancyhdr}\n\\RequirePackage{cuted}\n\\RequirePackage[tbtags,fleqn]{amsmath}\n\\RequirePackage{amssymb}\n\\setlength{\\mathindent}{\\z@}\n\\ifaa@letter\n \\RequirePackage{xcolor}\n\\fi\n\\RequirePackage{url, enumerate}\n\\RequirePackage{longtable}\n\\renewcommand*\\LT@makecaption[3]{%\n \\LT@mcol\\LT@cols\n c{\\hbox to\\z@{%\n \\hss\\parbox[t]\\LTcapwidth{%\n \\aa@longtablecaptionfont\n \\sbox\\@tempboxa{%\n #1{{\\aa@longtableheadcaptionfont#2.} }#3%\n }%\n \\ifdim\\wd\\@tempboxa>\\hsize\n #1{{\\aa@longtableheadcaptionfont#2.} }#3%\n \\else\n \\hbox to\\hsize{\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n \\fi\n \\endgraf\\vskip\\baselineskip\n }%\n \\hss\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\aa@biblio\n\\RequirePackage{xspace}\n\\RequirePackage[english]{babel}\n\\def\\aatolm#1{\\gdef\\@aatolm{#1}}\n\\def\\@aatolm{}\n\\renewenvironment{appendix}{\\par\\clearpage\\aatolm{1}\n\\def\\@hangfrom##1{\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{{##1}}%\n \\hangindent \\parindent\\noindent\\box\\@tempboxa}\n\\def\\sectcounterend{:}\n\\def\\@seccntformat##1{\\appendixname\\ \\csname the##1\\endcsname\\sectcounterend%\n \\hskip\\betweenumberspace}\n \\setcounter{section}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{figure}{0}%\n \\setcounter{table}{0}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesection{\\@Alph\\c@section}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesubsection{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\@arabic\\c@subsection}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesubsubsection{\\thesubsection.\\@arabic\\c@subsubsection}%\n \\renewcommand\\theequation{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\@arabic\\c@equation}%\n \\renewcommand\\thefigure{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\@arabic\\c@figure}%\n \\renewcommand\\thetable{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\@arabic\\c@table}%\n \\@addtoreset{equation}{section}%\n \\@addtoreset{figure}{section}%\n \\@addtoreset{table}{section}}\n{\n \\setcounter{section}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{figure}{0}%\n \\setcounter{table}{0}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesection{\\@arabic\\c@section}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesubsection{\\@arabic\\c@subsection}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesubsubsection{\\@arabic\\c@subsubsection}%\n \\renewcommand\\theequation{\\@arabic\\c@equation}%\n \\renewcommand\\thefigure{\\@arabic\\c@figure}%\n \\renewcommand\\thetable{\\@arabic\\c@table}%\n}\n\\RequirePackage[figuresright]{rotating}\n\\newcount\\aa@cnta\n\\newcount\\aa@cntb\n\\newcount\\aa@nbwords\n\\newcount\\aa@nbauthors\n\\newcount\\aa@nbinstitutes\n\\newcommand*\\aa@traditabstractmax{300}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@structabstractmax{300}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywordsmax{6}\n\\newcounter{aa@institutecnt}\n\\newcount\\aa@savecounter\n\\newlength{\\aa@dima}\n\\newlength{\\aa@dimb}\n\\newlength{\\aa@dimc}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@removefootnoteindentspace{-1.5em}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@removefootnotewbindentspace{-2.25em}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logoruleindent{8\\p@}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logoruleraise{4\\p@}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logorulelength{78\\p@}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logorulethick{1\\p@}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logoraise{25\\p@}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logoraiserest{14.5\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTheorem}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTheorem}{8\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceAfterTheorem}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceAfterTheorem}{8\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\HSpaceIndentTheorem}\n\\setlength{\\HSpaceIndentTheorem}{\\z@}\n\\newlength{\\HVSpaceSepTheorem}\n\\setlength{\\HVSpaceSepTheorem}{0.25em}\n\\newlength{\\aa@securityheadmargin}\n\\setlength{\\aa@securityheadmargin}{2cm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@bleedmargin}\n\\setlength{\\aa@bleedmargin}{5mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@voffsetlettername}\n\\setlength{\\aa@voffsetlettername}{2.55cm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@hoffsetlettername}\n\\setlength{\\aa@hoffsetlettername}{2mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@hoffsetgray}\n\\setlength{\\aa@hoffsetgray}{3mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftercontentsnameskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftercontentsnameskip}{12\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftercontentsAutnameskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftercontentsAutnameskip}{12\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforeheadboxskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforeheadboxskip}{-20\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterheadboxskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterheadboxskip}{49\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforetopicsskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforetopicsskip}{18\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftertopicsskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftertopicsskip}{32\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterletternameskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterletternameskip}{6mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforeletternameskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforeletternameskip}{-4.8mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforeheadnoteskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforeheadnoteskip}{-12\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterheadnoteskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterheadnoteskip}{3.5mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftertitleskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftertitleskip}{10\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforesubtitleskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforesubtitleskip}{7\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftersubtitleskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftersubtitleskip}{10\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterauthorskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterauthorskip}{16.5\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforedefaultheadnoteskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforedefaultheadnoteskip}{2pt}\n\\newlength{\\aa@headingleftmargin}\n\\setlength{\\aa@headingleftmargin}{8mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@headingrightmargin}\n\\setlength{\\aa@headingrightmargin}{8mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterinstituteskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterinstituteskip}{8\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@instituteindent}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterdateskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterdateskip}{16.5\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterdedicationskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterdedicationskip}{16.5\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterabstractnameskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterabstractnameskip}{9\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterabstractskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterabstractskip}{6\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}{\\z@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterkeywordsskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterkeywordsskip}{24\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforeacknowledgementsskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforeacknowledgementsskip}{6pt}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afteracknowledgementsskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afteracknowledgementsskip}{6pt}\n\\newlength{\\aa@figgap}\n\\setlength{\\aa@figgap}{12pt}\n\\newlength{\\aa@sidecaptionminwidth}\n\\setlength{\\aa@sidecaptionminwidth}{5cm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@sidecaptionwidth}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceBeforeFigCaption}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceBeforeFigCaption}{5pt}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceAfterTabCaption}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceAfterTabCaption}{10pt}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTabBib}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTabBib}{2ex}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTabFoot}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTabFoot}{2ex}\n\\newlength{\\aftertext}\n\\setlength{\\aftertext}{5pt}\n\\newlength{\\aa@entryboxwidth}\n\\setlength{\\aa@entryboxwidth}{8mm}\n\\newlength{\\betweenumberspace}\n\\setlength{\\betweenumberspace}{3.33pt}\n\\newif\\ifaa@structabstract\n\\newif\\ifaa@numberedtheorem\n\\newif\\ifaa@firstonline\n\\aa@firstonlinetrue\n\\newcommand*\\journalname[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@journalname{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@journalname{Astronomy \\& Astrophysics}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@manuscriptname{%\n manuscript no. \\jobname\n \\hspace{\\stretch{1}}%\n \\copyright ESO \\the\\year\n}\n\\def\\Num{1}\n\\def\\Vol{1}\n\\def\\Month{JANUARY~I}\n\\newcommand*\\AANum[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@numarticle{#1}%\n\\gdef\\@AANum{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\@AANum{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@numarticle{Article number}\n\\newcommand*\\doi[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@doi{DOI: #1}%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@doifig{#1}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@doi{(DOI: will be inserted by hand later)}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@doifig{(to add)}\n\\newcommand*\\AALogo{%\n \\settowidth{\\aa@dima}{\\aa@logo@astrophysicsfont Astrophysics}%\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{%\n \\begin{minipage}{\\aa@dima}\n \\aa@logo@astronomyfont Astronomy\\\\\n \\raisebox{\\aa@logoraise}{%\n \\parbox[c][0pt]{\\z@}{%\n \\rlap{%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@logoruleindent}%\n \\aa@logo@andfont \\&%\n \\rule[\\aa@logoruleraise]{\\aa@logorulelength}{\\aa@logorulethick}%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n \\raisebox{\\aa@logoraiserest}{\\aa@logo@astrophysicsfont Astrophysics}\n \\end{minipage}%\n }%\n \\copy0%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@pageof{, page \\thepage{} of \\pageref{LastPage}}\n\\newcommand*{\\aa@publishlink}{\\hfil%\n Article published by EDP Sciences%\n \\hfil}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@topicsname{Special feature}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@offprintsname{Send offprint requests to\\/}\n\\newcommand*\\listobjectname{List of Objects}\n\\addto\\captionsenglish{\\renewcommand*\\figurename{Fig.}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@figtype{figure}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tabtype{table}\n\\newcommand*\\lettername{Letter to the Editor}\n\\newcommand*\\noteaddname{Note added in proof.}\n\\def\\noteadd{\\par\\addvspace{17pt}\\rm\n\\trivlist\\item[\\hskip\\labelsep\n{\\it\\noteaddname}]}\n\\def\\endnoteadd{\\endtrivlist\\addvspace{6pt}}\n\\newcommand*\\andname{\\unskip, }\n\\newcommand*\\andlastname{\\unskip, and }\n\\newcommand*\\andtwoname{\\unskip\\ and }\n\\newcommand*\\etalname{et al.}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@contentsname{Contents sorted by section}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@contentsAutname{Contents sorted by first author}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@pagename{page}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@AAname{A\\&A}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@copyrightname{\\copyright~ESO}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractiname{Context}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractiiname{Aims}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractiiiname{Methods}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractivname{Results}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractvname{Conclusions}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywordname{Key words}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@acknowledgementsname{Acknowledgements}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@floatcounterend{.~}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablebibname{References}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablefootname{Notes}\n\\renewcommand\\normalsize{%\n \\@setfontsize\\normalsize\\@xpt{11}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 8.55\\p@ \\@plus4\\p@ \\@minus5\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus3\\p@\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 6\\p@ \\@plus3\\p@ \\@minus3\\p@\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\let\\@listi\\@listI}\n\\normalsize\n\\renewcommand\\small{%\n \\@setfontsize\\small\\@ixpt{10}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 8.5\\p@ \\@plus3\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus2\\p@\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 4\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus2\\p@\n \\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\parsep 0\\p@ \\@plus1\\p@ \\@minus1\\p@\n \\topsep 8\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\itemsep0\\p@}%\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n}\n\\let\\footnotesize\\small\n\\renewcommand\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize\\scriptsize\\@viipt\\@viiipt}\n\\renewcommand\\tiny{\\@setfontsize\\tiny\\@viiipt\\@ixpt}\n\\renewcommand\\large{\\@setfontsize\\large\\@xipt{13}}\n\\renewcommand\\Large{\\@setfontsize\\Large\\@xivpt{16}}\n\\renewcommand\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize\\LARGE\\@xviipt{20}}\n\\renewcommand\\huge{\\@setfontsize\\huge\\@xxpt{24}}\n\\renewcommand\\Huge{\\@setfontsize\\Huge\\@xxvpt{30}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@footfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractfont{\\small\\sffamily\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@abstractfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@offprintsnamefont{\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logo@astronomyfont{\\fontsize{18}{21}\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logo@andfont{\\fontsize{16}{12}\\sffamily\\mdseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logo@astrophysicsfont{\\fontsize{18}{21}\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@letternamefont{\\sffamily\\fontsize{19.2\\p@}{21\\p@}\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headletternamefont{\\large\\scshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@contentsnamefont{\\Large\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@contentsAutnamefont{\\Large\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@journalnamefont{\\slshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@manuscriptnamefont{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@todayheadboxfont{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@msnrheadboxfont{\\LARGE\\bfseries\\smash}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@textidlineempty{{\\slshape A\\&A proofs:}\\ manuscript no.~\\jobname}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@idlinefont{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@doifont{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@copyrightfont{\\small}\n\\ifaa@letter\n \\definecolor{aa@colorletter}{gray}{0.6}\n\\fi\n\\newcommand*\\aa@topicsfont{\\fontsize{12}{14}\\sffamily\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@topicsnamefont{\\fontsize{17}{20}\\sffamily}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headnotefont{\\LARGE\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@defaultheadnotefont{\\LARGE\\sffamily\\bfseries\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@titlefont{\\LARGE \\sffamily\\bfseries\\boldmath}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subtitlefont{\\Large \\sffamily\\bfseries\\boldmath}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@authorfont{\\large}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@institutefont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@datefont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@dedicationfont{\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@abstractnamefont{\\small\\sffamily\\bfseries\\MakeUppercase}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywordnamefont{\\small\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywordfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@longauthfont{\\centering\\small\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@longauthname{Affiliations can be found after the references}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@longauthopen{(}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@longauthclose{)}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@acknowledgementsfont{\\tiny}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@acknowledgementsnamefont{\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@bibliographyfont{\\tiny}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@captionfont{\\normalfont\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headcaptionfont{\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablebibfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablebibnamefont{\\small\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablefootfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablefootnamefont{\\small\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@descriptionlabelfont{}\n\\newcommand\\aa@longtablecaptionfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand\\aa@longtableheadcaptionfont{\\small\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@emailfont{\\ttfamily}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@entryifont{\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@entryiifont{\\bfseries}\n\\newtoks\\authorlink\n\\newtoks\\yearCop\n\\newbox\\aa@stripbox\n\\newbox\\aa@outputbox\n\\newenvironment{aa@strip}\n{%\n \\onecolumn\\parindent0mm\n \\setbox\\aa@stripbox=\\vbox\\bgroup\n}\n{%\n \\egroup\n \\aa@@strip\n}\n\\def\\aa@@strip{%\n \\ifdim\\ht\\aa@stripbox>\\textheight\n \\global\\setbox\\aa@outputbox=\\vsplit\\aa@stripbox to \\textheight\n \\dp\\aa@outputbox \\z@\n \\box\\aa@outputbox\\clearpage\n \\expandafter\\aa@@strip\n \\else\n \\dp\\aa@stripbox \\z@\n \\twocolumn[\\box\\aa@stripbox]\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand{\\ErratumOf}[3][]{}\n\\newcommand{\\NoteFor}[3][]{}\n\\renewcommand*\\@fnsymbol[1]{%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\ifcase#1\n \\or\\star\n \\or{\\star}{\\star}\n \\or{\\star}{\\star}{\\star}%\n \\or{\\star}{\\star}{\\star}{\\star}\n \\or \\dagger\n \\or \\ddagger\n \\or \\mathsection\n \\or \\mathparagraph\n \\or \\|\n \\or **\n \\or \\dagger\\dagger\n \\or \\ddagger\\ddagger\n \\else \\@ctrerr\n \\fi\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand\\longempty{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@cntwords[1]{%\n \\protected@edef\\aa@cntwords@arg{#1\\space\\noexpand\\aa@nil\\space}%\n \\aa@nbwords \\z@\n \\let\\@@protect\\protect\n \\let\\protect\\@unexpandable@protect\n \\expandafter\\aa@@cntwords\\aa@cntwords@arg\n \\restore@protect\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@nnil{\\aa@nil}\n\\long\\def\\aa@@cntwords#1 {%\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\aa@nnil\n \\else\n \\advance\\aa@nbwords \\@ne\n \\expandafter\\aa@@cntwords\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@roheadletter{%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dima}\n {1in + \\topmargin + \\headheight - \\dp\\strutbox +\n 2\\aa@bleedmargin}%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dimb}\n {\\paperwidth - (1in + \\oddsidemargin + \\textwidth) +\n \\aa@bleedmargin - \\aa@hoffsetgray}%\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\aa@letternamefont \\lettername}%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dimc}\n {\\paperheight - \\aa@dima - \\wd0 + 2\\aa@bleedmargin}%\n \\addtolength{\\aa@voffsetlettername}{0.5cm}\n \\leavevmode\n \\hbox to0pt{%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@hoffsetgray}%\n \\vbox to0pt{%\n \\hsize=\\aa@dimb\n \\vskip-\\aa@dima\n \\colorbox{aa@colorletter}{%\n \\vtop{%\n \\vspace*{\\aa@voffsetlettername}%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@hoffsetlettername}%\n \\rotatebox{90}{\\aa@letternamefont \\lettername}%\n \\hfill\\null\n \\vspace*{\\aa@dimc}%\n }%\n }%\n \\vss\n }%\n \\hss\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@leheadletter{%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dima}\n {1in + \\topmargin + \\headheight - \\dp\\strutbox +\n 2\\aa@bleedmargin}%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dimb}\n {1in + \\oddsidemargin + \\aa@bleedmargin - \\aa@hoffsetgray}%\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\aa@letternamefont \\lettername}%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dimc}\n {\\paperheight-\\aa@dima-\\wd0+2\\aa@bleedmargin}%\n \\addtolength{\\aa@voffsetlettername}{0.5cm}\n \\leavevmode\n \\hspace*{-2\\fboxsep}%\n \\hbox to0pt{%\n \\hss\n \\vbox to0pt{%\n \\hsize=\\aa@dimb\n \\vskip-\\aa@dima\n \\colorbox{aa@colorletter}{%\n \\vtop{%\n \\vspace*{\\aa@voffsetlettername}%\n \\hfill\n \\rotatebox{90}{\\aa@letternamefont \\lettername}%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@hoffsetlettername}%\n \\vspace*{\\aa@dimc}%\n }%\n }%\n \\vss\n }%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@hoffsetgray}%\n }%\n}\n\\ifaa@online\n \\fancypagestyle{firstpage}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\fancyfoot[RO]{\\aa@footfont\\aa@publishlink\\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof}%\n \\fancyfoot[LE]{\\aa@footfont\\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof\\qquad\\aa@publishlink}%\n }\n\\else\n \\fancypagestyle{firstpage}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\fancyfoot[RO]{\\aa@footfont \\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof}%\n \\fancyfoot[LE]{\\aa@footfont \\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof}%\n }\n\\fi\n\\ifaa@contents\n \\fancypagestyle{otherpage}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\fancyhead[C]{\\aa@AAname}%\n \\fancyfoot[C]{\\aa@contentsname, \\aa@pagename\\space \\thepage}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n }\n\\else\\ifaa@contentsAut\n \\fancypagestyle{otherpage}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\fancyhead[C]{\\aa@AAname}%\n \\fancyfoot[C]{\\aa@contentsAutname, \\aa@pagename\\space \\thepage}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n }\n\\else\n \\fancypagestyle{otherpage}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\fancyhead[CO]{\\aa@headfont \\aa@headings}%\n \\fancyhead[CE]{\\aa@headfont \\ifx\\aa@idline\\empty\\aa@textidlineempty\\else\\aa@idline\\fi}%\n \\fancyfoot[RO]{\\aa@footfont \\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof}%\n \\fancyfoot[LE]{\\aa@footfont \\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n }\n\\fi\\fi\n\\pagestyle{otherpage}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headings{}\n\\renewcommand*\\date[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@date{#1}}%\n\\newcommand*\\aa@date{\\today}\n\\renewcommand*\\title[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@title{#1}}%\n\\newcommand*\\aa@title{}\n\\newcommand*\\subtitle[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@subtitle{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subtitle{}\n\\renewcommand*\\author[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@author{#1}%\n \\begingroup\n \\let\\and\\relax\n \\renewcommand*\\inst[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\thanks[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\email[1]{}%\n \\let\\@@protect\\protect\n \\let\\protect\\@unexpandable@protect\n \\global\\aa@nbauthors \\z@\n \\expandafter\\aa@cntauthors\\aa@author\\and\\aa@nil\\and\n \\restore@protect\n \\endgroup\n}%\n\\newcommand*\\aa@author{}\n\\def\\aa@cntauthors#1\\and{%\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\aa@nnil\n \\else\n \\global\\advance\\aa@nbauthors \\@ne\n \\expandafter\\aa@cntauthors\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\institute[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@institute{#1}\n \\begingroup\n \\let\\and\\relax\n \\renewcommand*\\inst[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\thanks[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\email[1]{}%\n \\let\\@@protect\\protect\n \\let\\protect\\@unexpandable@protect\n \\global\\aa@nbinstitutes \\z@\n \\expandafter\\aa@cntinstitutes\\aa@institute\\and\\aa@nil\\and\n \\restore@protect\n \\endgroup\n}%\n\\newcommand*\\aa@institute{}\n\\def\\aa@cntinstitutes#1\\and{%\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\aa@nnil\n \\else\n \\global\\advance\\aa@nbinstitutes \\@ne\n \\expandafter\\aa@cntinstitutes\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\inst[1]{\\unskip\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont$#1$}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fnmsep{\\unskip\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont,}}}\n\\newcommand*\\email[1]{e-mail: {\\aa@emailfont #1}}\n\\let\\endabstract\\relax\n\\renewcommand\\abstract[1]{%\n \\renewcommand\\aa@abstract@i{#1}%\n \\@ifnextchar\\bgroup{\\aa@abstract@next}{\\aa@abstract@one}\n}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@next[4]{%\n \\aa@structabstracttrue\n \\renewcommand\\aa@abstract@ii{#1}%\n \\renewcommand\\aa@abstract@iii{#2}%\n \\renewcommand\\aa@abstract@iv{#3}%\n \\renewcommand\\aa@abstract@v{#4}%\n \\begingroup\n \\renewcommand\\thanks[1]{}%\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@abstractwords{%\n \\aa@abstract@i \\space\n \\aa@abstract@ii \\space\n \\aa@abstract@iii \\space\n \\aa@abstract@iv \\space\n \\aa@abstract@v \\space\n }%\n \\endgroup\n \\aa@cnta \\z@\n \\aa@cntb \\aa@structabstractmax\n \\aa@abstract@cnt\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@abstract@one{%\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@abstractwords{\\aa@abstract@i}%\n \\aa@cnta \\z@\n \\aa@cntb \\aa@traditabstractmax\n \\aa@abstract@cnt\n}\n\\def\\aa@abstract@cnt{%\n \\aa@cntwords\\aa@abstractwords\n \\advance\\aa@nbwords \\aa@cnta\\relax\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbwords>\\aa@cntb\n \\typeout{^^J^^JIMPORTANT}\n \\ClassWarning{aa}\n {Around \\the\\aa@nbwords\\space words in the abstract instead\n of \\the\\aa@cntb\\space (max). You should rewrite your abstract}\n \\typeout{IMPORTANT\n ^^J}\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@i{}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@ii{}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@iii{}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@iv{}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@v{}\n\\newcommand*\\keywords[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@keywords{#1}%\n \\aa@keywords@cnt\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbwords>\\aa@keywordsmax\n \\ClassWarning{aa}\n {\\the\\aa@nbwords\\space keywords instead of a maximum of\n \\aa@keywordsmax\\space}\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywords{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@doublehyphen{--}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywords@cnt{%\n \\protected@edef\\aa@@keywords{\\aa@keywords--\\noexpand\\aa@nil--}%\n \\aa@nbwords \\z@\n \\let\\@@protect\\protect\n \\let\\protect\\@unexpandable@protect\n \\expandafter\\aa@@keywords@cnt\\aa@@keywords\n \\restore@protect\n}\n\\def\\aa@@keywords@cnt#1--{%\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\aa@nnil\n \\else\n \\advance\\aa@nbwords \\@ne\n \\expandafter\\aa@@keywords@cnt\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\topics[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@topics{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@topics{}\n\\newcommand*\\titlerunning[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@titlerunning{#1}\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@titlerunning{}\n\\newcommand*\\authorrunning[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@authorrunning{#1}\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@authorrunning{}\n\\newcommand*\\offprints[1]{%\n \\protected@edef\\@thanks{%\n \\@thanks\n \\protect\\footnotetext[0]{%\n \\unskip%\n \\if@wideboxfn%\n \\hspace{\\aa@removefootnotewbindentspace}%\n \\else%\n \\hspace{\\aa@removefootnoteindentspace}%\n \\fi\n {%\n \\aa@offprintsnamefont\n \\aa@offprintsname\n }: \\ignorespaces#1%\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\def\\aainstitutename{\\par\n \\begingroup\n \\renewcommand*\\and{%\n \\par\\refstepcounter{aa@institutecnt}%\n \\hangindent\\aa@instituteindent\n \\noindent\n \\hbox to\\aa@instituteindent{%\n \\hss\n \\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont\\theaa@institutecnt}}%\n \\enspace\n }%\n \\ignorespaces\n }%\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbinstitutes>99\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont888}}\\enspace}%\n \\else\\ifnum\\aa@nbinstitutes>9\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont88}}\\enspace}%\n \\else\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont8}}\\enspace}%\n \\fi\\fi\n \\aa@instituteindent \\wd0\n {%\n \\aa@institutefont\n \\par\\refstepcounter{aa@institutecnt}%\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbinstitutes=1\\relax\n \\noindent\\ignorespaces\n \\else\n \\hangindent\\aa@instituteindent\n \\noindent\n \\hbox to\\aa@instituteindent{%\n \\hss\n \\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont\\theaa@institutecnt}}%\n \\enspace\n }\\ignorespaces%\n \\fi%\n \\aa@institute\\par\n }\n \\endgroup}\n\\newcommand*\\mail[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@mail{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@mail{}\n\\newcommand*\\msnr[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@msnr{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@msnr{}\n\\newcommand*\\idline[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@idline{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@idline{}\n\\newcommand*\\headnote[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@headnote{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headnote{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@defaultheadnote{Corrigendum}\n\\newcommand*\\dedication[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@dedication{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@dedication{}\n\\renewcommand*\\maketitle{%\n \\thispagestyle{firstpage}\n\\begingroup\n \\if@wideboxfn\n \\setlength\\bibindent{1.4\\parindent}\n \\else\n \\setlength\\bibindent{\\parindent}\n \\fi\n \\renewcommand*\\thefootnote{\\@fnsymbol\\c@footnote}%\n \\renewcommand\\@makefntext[1]{%\n \\ifaa@longfn\\hsize\\textwidth\\fi\n \\noindent\n \\hb@xt@\\bibindent{\\hss\\@makefnmark\\enspace}##1}\n \\ifaa@twocolumn\n \\begingroup\n \\twocolumn[\\aa@maketitle]\n \\@thanks\n \\endgroup\n \\else\n \\begingroup\n \\let\\thanks\\footnote\n \\aa@maketitle\n \\endgroup\n \\fi\n\\endgroup\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@maketitle{%\n \\ifaa@contents\n {\\aa@contentsnamefont \\aa@contentsname\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftercontentsnameskip}\n \\else\\ifaa@contentsAut\n {\\aa@contentsAutnamefont \\aa@contentsAutname\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftercontentsAutnameskip}\n \\else\n \\vbox to0pt{\\vskip\\aa@beforeheadboxskip\n \\nointerlineskip\n \\ifx\\aa@idline\\empty\n \\noindent\n \\fbox{%\n \\begin{minipage}{\\linewidth-2\\fboxsep-2\\fboxrule}\n \\strut\n {\\aa@journalnamefont \\aa@journalname}\n {\\aa@manuscriptnamefont \\aa@manuscriptname}\\\\\n \\ifx\\aa@msnr\\empty\n {\\strut\\aa@todayheadboxfont \\today}%\n \\else\n \\makebox[0.75\\linewidth][r]{%\n \\strut\n {\\aa@msnrheadboxfont \\aa@msnr}%\n }%\n \\fi\n \\end{minipage}%\n }%\n \\else\n \\begin{tabular}[b]{@{}l@{}}\n \\aa@idlinefont \\aa@idline\\\\\n \\aa@doifont \\aa@doi\\\\\n \\aa@copyrightfont \\aa@copyrightname~\\if!\\the\\yearCop!\\the\\year\\else\\the\\yearCop\\fi\n \\end{tabular}\n \\hfill\\AALogo\n \\fi\\vss}\n \\par\n \\ifx\\aa@topics\\empty%\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afterheadboxskip}\n \\else\n \\addvspace{\\aa@beforetopicsskip}\n {\\noindent\\aa@topicsfont \\aa@topics}%\n \\hfill\n {\\aa@topicsnamefont \\aa@topicsname\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftertopicsskip}\n \\fi\n \\begingroup\n \\centering\n \\ifaa@letter\n \\ifx\\aa@topics\\empty\n \\addvspace{1.8\\aa@beforeletternameskip}\n \\else\n \\addvspace{\\aa@beforeletternameskip}\n \\fi\n {\\aa@headletternamefont \\lettername\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afterletternameskip}\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\aa@headnote\\empty\\else\n \\ifx\\aa@headnote\\aa@defaultheadnote\\else\n {\\aa@headnotefont \\aa@headnote\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afterheadnoteskip}\n \\fi\n \\fi\n {\\aa@titlefont \\aa@title\\par}\n \\ifx\\aa@subtitle\\empty%\n \\ifx\\aa@headnote\\aa@defaultheadnote\n {\\aa@defaultheadnotefont (\\aa@headnote)\\par}\n \\fi\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftertitleskip}\n \\else\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftertitleskip}\n {\\aa@subtitlefont \\aa@subtitle\\par}\n \\ifx\\aa@headnote\\aa@defaultheadnote\n \\addvspace{\\aa@beforedefaultheadnoteskip}\n {\\aa@defaultheadnotefont (\\aa@headnote)\\par}\n \\fi\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftersubtitleskip}\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbauthors=\\tw@\n \\let\\and\\andtwoname\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\and{%\n \\advance\\aa@cnta \\@ne\n \\ifnum\\aa@cnta=\\aa@nbauthors\n \\andlastname\n \\else\n \\andname\n \\fi\n }\n \\fi\n \\aa@cnta \\@ne\n {\\aa@authorfont \\aa@author\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afterauthorskip}\n \\endgroup\n \\begingroup\n \\ifaa@longauth\\addvspace{-10pt}\n {\\noindent\\aa@longauthfont%\n \\aa@longauthopen\\aa@longauthname\\aa@longauthclose\\par}\n \\else\n \\leftskip \\aa@headingleftmargin\n \\rightskip \\aa@headingrightmargin\n \\aainstitutename\n \\fi\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterinstituteskip}\n {\\noindent\\aa@datefont\\ifaa@longauth\\centering\\fi \\aa@date\\par}\n \\ifx\\aa@dedication\\empty\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterdateskip}\n \\else\n \\addvspace\\baselineskip\n {\\noindent\\aa@dedicationfont \\aa@dedication\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterdedicationskip}\n \\fi\n {\\centering\\aa@abstractnamefont \\abstractname\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterabstractnameskip}\n \\ifaa@structabstract\n \\ifx\\aa@abstract@i\\longempty\\else\n {\\noindent\\aa@subabstractfont \\aa@subabstractiname. }%\n {\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@i\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}\n \\fi\n {\\noindent\\aa@subabstractfont \\aa@subabstractiiname. }%\n {\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@ii\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}\n {\\noindent\\aa@subabstractfont \\aa@subabstractiiiname. }%\n {\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@iii\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}\n {\\noindent\\aa@subabstractfont \\aa@subabstractivname. }%\n {\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@iv\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}\n \\ifx\\aa@abstract@v\\longempty\\else\n {\\noindent\\aa@subabstractfont \\aa@subabstractvname. }%\n {\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@v\\par}\n \\fi\n \\else\n {\\noindent\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@i\\par}\n \\fi\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterabstractskip}\n \\ifx\\aa@keywords\\empty\\else\n \\noindent\n {\\aa@keywordnamefont \\aa@keywordname. }\n {\\aa@keywordfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@keywords\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterkeywordsskip}\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\renewcommand*\\thanks[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\inst[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\fnmsep{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\and{, }%\n \\renewcommand*\\\\{ }%\n \\renewcommand*\\vspace[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\offprints[1]{}%\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@PDFauthor{\\if!\\the\\authorlink!\\aa@author\\else\\the\\authorlink\\fi}%\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@PDFtitle{\\noexpand\\protect\\noexpand\\aa@title}%\n \\def\\object##1{##1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@authorrunning\\empty\n \\let\\and\\relax\n \\renewcommand*\\\\{\\unskip\\space\\ignorespaces}%\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbauthors=1\n \\expandafter\\aa@extractoneauthor\\aa@author\\and\\aa@nil\n \\else\\ifnum\\aa@nbauthors=2\n \\expandafter\\aa@extracttwoauthor\\aa@author\\and\\aa@nil\n \\else\n \\expandafter\\aa@extractoneauthor\\aa@author\\and\\aa@nil\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@headings{\\aa@headings\\unskip\\space\\etalname\\space}%\n \\fi\\fi\n \\else\n \\xdef\\aa@headings{\\aa@authorrunning}%\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\aa@titlerunning\\empty\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@headings{\\aa@headings\\unskip: \\aa@title}%\n \\else\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@headings{\\aa@headings\\unskip: \\aa@titlerunning}%\n \\fi\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@securityheadmargin}%\n \\aa@headfont \\aa@headings\n }%\n \\ifdim\\wd0>\\aa@fullwidth\n \\typeout{^^J^^JIMPORTANT}\n \\ClassWarning{aa}\n {The running head built automatically\n from \\string\\author\\space and \\string\\title\n exceeds the pagewidth, please supply a shorter form\n with \\string\\authorrunning\\space and/or\n \\string\\titlerunning\\space prior to \\string\\maketitle}\n {Use \\string\\titlerunning\\space to supply a shorter\n title and/or \\string\\authorrunning\\space to supply a\n shorter list of authors.}%\n \\typeout{IMPORTANT\n ^^J}\n \\fi\n \\fi\\fi\n}\n\\def\\aa@extractoneauthor#1\\and#2\\aa@nil{%\n \\gdef\\aa@headings{#1}%\n}\n\\def\\aa@extracttwoauthor#1\\and#2\\and#3\\aa@nil{%\n \\gdef\\aa@headings{#1\\andtwoname#2}%\n}\n\\def\\sectcounterend{.}\n\\def\\@seccntformat#1{\\csname the#1\\endcsname\\sectcounterend\n\\hskip\\betweenumberspace}\n\\def\\@sect#1#2#3#4#5#6[#7]#8{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth\n \\let\\@svsec\\@empty\n \\else\n \\refstepcounter{#1}%\n \\protected@edef\\@svsec{\\@seccntformat{#1}\\relax}%\n \\fi\n \\@tempskipa #5\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n \\begingroup\n #6{%\n \\@hangfrom{\\hskip #3\\relax\\@svsec}%\n \\raggedright\n \\hyphenpenalty \\@M%\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M #8\\@@par}%\n \\endgroup\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}%\n \\fi\n #7}%\n \\else\n \\def\\@svsechd{%\n #6{\\hskip #3\\relax\n \\@svsec #8\\hskip\\aftertext}%\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}%\n \\fi\n #7}}%\n \\fi\n \\@xsect{#5}}\n\\ifaa@contentsAut\n \\renewcommand\\section{%\n \\@startsection{section}\n {1}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd \\@plus-4\\p@ \\@minus-4\\p@}\n {6dd}\n {\\large\\bfseries\\boldmath\\MakeUppercase}%\n }\n\\else\\ifaa@contents\n \\renewcommand\\section{%\n \\@startsection{section}\n {1}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd \\@plus-4\\p@ \\@minus-4\\p@}\n {6dd}\n {\\large\\bfseries\\boldmath\\MakeUppercase}%\n }\n\\else\n \\renewcommand\\section{%\n \\@startsection{section}\n {1}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd\\@plus-4\\p@ \\@minus-4\\p@}\n {6dd}\n {\\large\\sffamily\\bfseries\\boldmath}%\n }\n\\fi\\fi\n\\renewcommand\\subsection{%\n \\@startsection{subsection}\n {2}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd}\n {6dd}\n {\\normalsize\\sffamily\\itshape}%\n}\n\\renewcommand\\subsubsection{%\n \\@startsection{subsubsection}\n {3}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd}\n {6dd}\n {\\normalsize\\sffamily}%\n}\n\\renewcommand\\paragraph{%\n \\@startsection{paragraph}\n {4}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd}\n {-\\fontdimen2\\font\n \\@plus-\\fontdimen3\\font\n \\@minus-\\fontdimen4\\font}\n {\\normalsize\\sffamily}%\n}\n\\renewcommand\\subparagraph{%\n \\ClassError{aa}{Command \\string\\subparagrap\\space isn't allowed}\n {Only commands from \\string\\section\\space to\n \\string\\paragraph\\space are allowed.}\n}\n\\renewcommand\\part{%\n \\ClassError{aa}{Command \\string\\part\\space isn't allowed}\n {Only commands from \\string\\section\\space to\n \\string\\paragraph\\space are allowed.}\n}\n\\frenchspacing\n\\clubpenalty=10000\n\\widowpenalty=10000\n\\flushbottom\n\\ifaa@twocolumn\n \\sloppy\n\\fi\n\\newenvironment{nopar}\n {\\let\\par\\relax%\n \\aa@acknowledgementsfont\n {%\n \\noindent\\aa@acknowledgementsnamefont\n \\aa@acknowledgementsname.%\n }%\n \\hskip.5em\n }{}\n\\newenvironment{acknowledgements}\n {%\n \\par\\addvspace{\\aa@beforeacknowledgementsskip}\n \\begin{spacing}{0.81}\n \\begin{nopar}\n }\n {%\n \\end{nopar}\n \\end{spacing}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afteracknowledgementsskip}\n }\n\\let\\acknowledgement\\acknowledgements\n\\let\\endacknowledgement\\endacknowledgements\n\\renewcommand\\@makefntext[1]{%\n \\noindent\n \\hb@xt@\\bibindent{\\hss\\@makefnmark\\enspace}#1}\n\\newcommand\\listofobjects{\\if@myobjects%\n \\section*{\\listobjectname}\n \\@starttoc{obj}\\fi%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\l@obj[2]{\\noindent`#1' on page #2\\par}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand{\\object}[1]{%\n #1\\global\\let\\if@myobjects\\iftrue%\n \\addcontentsline{obj}{obj}{#1}%\n}\n\\newcommand\\longtab[2][]{%\n\\if!\\@aatolm!\n \\aalongfloat{table}{#2}%\n\\else\n \\aalongfloat[#1]{section}{#2}%\n\\fi\n}\n\\newcommand\\aalongfloat[3][]{%\n \\AtEndDocument{%\n \\aa@savecounter \\csname c@#2\\endcsname \\relax\n \\csname c@#2\\endcsname\n }%\n \\edef\\aa@nombre{\\number\\csname c@#2\\endcsname}%\n\\if!\\@aatolm!\n \\expandafter\\AtEndDocument\\expandafter{%\n \\aa@nombre\\relax\n \\setlength{\\LTcapwidth}{\\textwidth}\n \\onecolumn\n #3%\n \\twocolumn\n \\csname c@#2\\endcsname \\aa@savecounter \\relax\n }%\n \\stepcounter{#2}%\n\\else\n \\expandafter\\AtEndDocument\\expandafter{%\n \\aa@nombre\\relax\n \\setlength{\\LTcapwidth}{\\textwidth}\n \\onecolumn\n\\setcounter{table}{#1}\\addtocounter{table}{-1}\n\\renewcommand\\thesection{\\Alph{section}}%\n\\renewcommand\\thetable{\\thesection.\\arabic{table}}\n #3%\n \\twocolumn\n \\csname c@#2\\endcsname \\aa@savecounter \\relax\n }%\n \\setcounter{table}{#1}\n\\fi\n}\n\\renewcommand*\\enddocument{%\n \\let\\AtEndDocument\\@firstofone\n \\@enddocumenthook\n \\clearpage\n \\advance\\c@page \\m@ne\n \\immediate\\write\\@auxout{\\string\\newlabel{LastPage}{{\\thepage}{\\thepage}{}{}{}}}\n \\@checkend{document}%\n \\clearpage\n \\begingroup\n \\if@filesw\n \\immediate\\closeout\\@mainaux\n \\let\\@setckpt\\@gobbletwo\n \\let\\@newl@bel\\@testdef\n \\@tempswafalse\n \\makeatletter \\input\\jobname.aux\n \\fi\n \\@dofilelist\n \\ifdim \\font@submax >\\fontsubfuzz\\relax\n \\@font@warning{Size substitutions with differences\\MessageBreak\n up to \\font@submax\\space have occurred.\\@gobbletwo}%\n \\fi\n \\@defaultsubs\n \\@refundefined\n \\if@filesw\n \\ifx \\@multiplelabels \\relax\n \\if@tempswa\n \\@latex@warning@no@line{Label(s) may have changed.\n Rerun to get cross-references right}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\@multiplelabels\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\deadcycles\\z@\\@@end}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@defineentry{%\n \\newcommand{\\entry}[3]{%\n \\par\\noindent\n {\\aa@entryiifont ##2}%\n \\par\n {%\n \\noindent\n \\raggedright\n {\\aa@entryifont ##1}%\n \\hfill\n \\rlap{\\makebox[\\aa@entryboxwidth][l]{\\hfill##3}}%\n \\par\n }%\n \\vspace{\\aftertext}\n }\n}\n\\ifaa@contents \\aa@defineentry \\fi\n\\ifaa@contentsAut \\aa@defineentry \\fi\n\\renewcommand\\@listi{%\n \\leftmargin \\leftmargini\n \\parsep \\z@ \\@plus\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\topsep 8\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\itemsep \\parsep\n}\n\\let\\listI\\@listi\n\\@listi\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\let\\@listi\\listI\n \\@listi\n}\n\\renewcommand\\@listii{%\n \\leftmargin \\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth \\leftmarginii\n \\advance\\labelwidth -\\labelsep\n \\topsep \\z@\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\itemsep \\z@\n}\n\\renewcommand\\@listiii{%\n \\leftmargin \\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth \\leftmarginiii\n \\advance\\labelwidth -\\labelsep\n \\topsep \\z@\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\itemsep \\z@\n \\partopsep \\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n }\n\\newcommand*\\aa@setitemindent[1]{%\n \\settowidth{\\labelwidth}{\\aa@descriptionlabelfont #1}%\n \\leftmargini \\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmargini \\labelsep\n \\renewcommand*\\@listi{%\n \\leftmargin \\leftmargini\n \\labelwidth \\leftmargini\n \\advance\\labelwidth -\\labelsep\n \\parsep \\parskip\n \\topsep \\medskipamount\n \\itemsep \\parskip\n \\advance\\itemsep -\\parsep\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@setitemitemindent[1]{%\n \\settowidth{\\labelwidth}{\\aa@descriptionlabelfont #1}%\n \\leftmarginii \\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmarginii \\labelsep\n \\renewcommand*\\@listii{%\n \\leftmargin \\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth \\leftmarginii\n \\advance\\labelwidth -\\labelsep\n \\parsep \\parskip\n \\topsep \\z@\n \\itemsep \\parskip\n \\advance\\itemsep -\\parsep\n }%\n}\n\\renewcommand*\\descriptionlabel[1]{\\hspace\\labelsep #1\\hfil}\n\\renewcommand*\\description{%\n \\@ifnextchar[{\\aa@description} % ] (pour Emacs)\n {%\n \\list{}{%\n \\labelwidth\\z@\n \\itemindent -\\leftmargin\n \\let\\makelabel\\descriptionlabel\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand\\aa@description[1][]{%\n \\relax\\ifnum\\@listdepth=0\n \\aa@setitemindent{#1}%\n \\else\\ifnum\\@listdepth=1\n \\aa@setitemitemindent{#1}%\n \\fi\\fi\n \\list{--}{\\let\\makelabel\\aa@descriptionlabel}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@descriptionlabel[1]{%\n \\aa@descriptionlabelfont\n #1%\n \\hfil\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@theorem@aftercount{.}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@theorem@aftertitle{.}\n\\renewcommand*\\newtheorem{%\n \\@ifstar{\\aa@theorem@withstar}{\\aa@theorem@nostar}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@theorem@nostar{%\n \\aa@numberedtheoremtrue\n \\aa@newtheorem\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@theorem@withstar{%\n \\aa@numberedtheoremfalse\n \\aa@newtheorem\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@newtheorem[1]{%\n \\def\\aa@theorem@name{#1}%\n \\expandafter\\newif\\csname ifaa@theorem@#1@numbered\\endcsname\n \\ifaa@numberedtheorem\n \\csname aa@theorem@#1@numberedtrue\\endcsname\n \\fi\n \\aa@@newtheorem\n}\n\\newif\\ifaa@newcounter\n\\newcommand*\\aa@@newtheorem[2][]{%\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\empty\n \\expandafter\\edef\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname\n {AA\\aa@theorem@name}%\n \\aa@newcountertrue\n \\else\n \\expandafter\\ifx\n \\csname aa@theorem@#1@title\\endcsname\n \\relax\n \\ClassError{aa}\n {#1 isn't a theorem-like environment}\n {You have to create #1 with \\string\\newtheorem\\space\n before use its counter.}%\n \\expandafter\\edef\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname\n {AA\\aa@theorem@name}%\n \\aa@newcountertrue\n \\else\n \\expandafter\\def\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname\n {AA#1}%\n \\aa@newcounterfalse\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\expandafter\\newcommand\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @title\\endcsname\n {#2}%\n \\aa@@@newtheorem\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@@@newtheorem[3][]{%\n \\ifaa@newcounter\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\empty\n \\newcounter{\\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname}%\n \\else\n \\newcounter{\\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname}[#1]%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\n \\csname theaa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname{%\n \\expandafter\\noexpand\\csname the#1\\endcsname.%\n \\noexpand\\arabic{aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter}%\n }%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\expandafter\\newcommand\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @titlefont\\endcsname{#2}%\n \\expandafter\\newcommand\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @bodyfont\\endcsname{#3}%\n \\newenvironment{\\aa@theorem@name}[1][]{%\n \\def\\aa@theorem@optionnal{##1}%\n \\par\\addvspace{\\VSpaceBeforeTheorem}%\n \\noindent\\hspace*{\\HSpaceIndentTheorem}%\n \\begingroup\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\@currenvir @titlefont\\endcsname\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\@currenvir @title\\endcsname\n \\csname ifaa@theorem@\\@currenvir @numbered\\endcsname\n \\refstepcounter{\\csname aa@theorem@\\@currenvir @counter\\endcsname}%\n \\space\n \\csname the\\csname aa@theorem@\\@currenvir @counter\\endcsname\\endcsname\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\aa@theorem@optionnal\\empty\n \\aa@theorem@aftercount\n \\else\n \\space(\\aa@theorem@optionnal)%\n \\aa@theorem@aftertitle\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\ifdim\\HVSpaceSepTheorem<\\z@\n \\par\\nobreak\n \\vspace{-\\HVSpaceSepTheorem}%\n \\noindent\\hspace*{\\HSpaceIndentTheorem}%\n \\else\n \\hspace*{\\HVSpaceSepTheorem}%\n \\fi\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\@currenvir @bodyfont\\endcsname\n }%\n {%\n \\par\\addvspace{\\VSpaceAfterTheorem}\n }%\n}\n\\newtheorem*{proof}{Proof}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}{\\bfseries}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{exercise}[theorem]{Exercise}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\newtheorem{note}[theorem]{Note}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{problem}[theorem]{Problem}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\newtheorem{question}[theorem]{Question}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{solution}[theorem]{Solution}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\setlength{\\textfloatsep}{18\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\dbltextfloatsep}{18\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\@fptop}{\\z@}\n\\setlength{\\@fpsep}{12\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\@dblfptop}{\\z@}\n\\setlength{\\@dblfpsep}{12\\p@}\n\\setcounter{topnumber}{4}\n\\renewcommand*\\topfraction{.9}\n\\setcounter{bottomnumber}{2}\n\\renewcommand*\\bottomfraction{.5}\n\\setcounter{totalnumber}{6}\n\\renewcommand*\\textfraction{.05}\n\\renewcommand*\\floatpagefraction{.95}\n\\setcounter{dbltopnumber}{3}\n\\renewcommand*\\dbltopfraction{.9}\n\\renewcommand*\\dblfloatpagefraction{.95}\n\\renewcommand*\\fps@figure{tbp}\n\\renewcommand*\\fps@table{tbp}\n\\def\\sidecaption#1\\caption{%\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\ignorespaces#1\\unskip}%\n \\aa@sidecaptionwidth=\\linewidth\n \\advance\\aa@sidecaptionwidth -\\wd0\n \\advance\\aa@sidecaptionwidth -\\aa@figgap\n \\ifdim\\aa@sidecaptionwidth<\\aa@sidecaptionminwidth\n \\ClassWarning{aa}{%\n No sufficient room for the legend;\n using normal \\string\\caption.%\n }%\n \\let\\aa@caption\\@caption\n \\unhbox0\n \\else\n \\let\\aa@caption\\aa@sidecaption\n \\dimen0 \\dp0\n \\advance\\dimen0 \\ht0\n \\dp0 \\dp\\strutbox\n \\advance\\dimen0-\\dp0\n \\ht0 \\dimen0\n \\unhbox0\\hspace{\\aa@figgap}%\n \\fi\n \\refstepcounter\\@captype\n \\@dblarg{\\aa@caption\\@captype}%\n}\n\\long\\def\\aa@sidecaption#1[#2]#3{%\n \\addcontentsline\n {\\csname ext@#1\\endcsname}\n {#1}\n {\\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}{\\ignorespaces #2}}%\n \\begingroup\n \\@parboxrestore\n \\aa@makesidecaption{\\csname fnum@#1\\endcsname}{\\ignorespaces #3}%\n \\par\n \\endgroup\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@capstrut{%\n \\leavevmode\n \\vrule \\@width\\z@ \\@height\\ht\\strutbox \\@depth\\z@\n}\n\\def\\aa@@makecaption#1{%\n {\\aa@headcaptionfont #1\\aa@floatcounterend}%\n}\n\\long\\def\\aa@makesidecaption#1#2{%\n \\parbox[b]{\\aa@sidecaptionwidth}{%\n \\aa@captionfont\n \\aa@@makecaption{#1}\n \\aa@capstrut\n #2%\n }%\n}\n\\renewcommand\\@makecaption[2]{%\n \\aa@captionfont\n \\ifx\\@captype\\aa@figtype\n \\par\\vskip\\VSpaceBeforeFigCaption\n \\aa@@makecaption{#1}%\n \\aa@capstrut%\n #2%\n \\par\n \\else\n {\\aa@headcaptionfont #1\\aa@floatcounterend}%\n \\aa@capstrut\n #2%\n \\par\n \\vskip\\VSpaceAfterTabCaption\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand\\tablebib[1]{\\VSpaceBeforeTabFoot=1ex%\n \\par\\vspace{\\VSpaceBeforeTabBib}\n \\noindent\n \\begin{minipage}{\\linewidth}\n {\\aa@tablebibnamefont\\aa@tablebibname.}~%\n \\aa@tablebibfont\n \\ignorespaces\n #1%\n \\end{minipage}%\n}\n\\newcommand\\tablefoot[1]{\\VSpaceBeforeTabBib=1ex%\n \\par\\vspace{\\VSpaceBeforeTabFoot}\n \\noindent\n \\begin{minipage}{\\linewidth}\n {\\aa@tablefootnamefont\\aa@tablefootname.}~%\n \\aa@tablefootfont\n \\ignorespaces\n #1%\n \\end{minipage}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\tablefootmark[1]{%\n \\unskip\n \\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont\\itshape\\ignorespaces#1}}%\n \\,%\n \\ignorespaces\n}\n\\newcommand\\tablefoottext[2]{%\n \\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont({\\itshape\\ignorespaces#1})}}%\n ~%\n \\ignorespaces\n #2\\ \\ignorespaces%\n}\n\\setlength\\bibindent{1em}\n\\renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]{%\n \\begingroup\n \\section*{\\refname}%\n \\@mkboth{\\refname}{\\refname}%\n \\aa@bibliographyfont\n \\list{\\@biblabel{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n {%\n \\settowidth\\labelwidth{\\@biblabel{#1}}%\n \\ifaa@bibnumber\n \\leftmargin\\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\labelsep\n \\else\n \\leftmargin\\bibindent\n \\setlength{\\itemindent}{-\\leftmargin}\n \\fi\n \\@openbib@code\n \\usecounter{enumiv}%\n \\let\\p@enumiv\\@empty\n \\renewcommand\\theenumiv{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}%\n }%\n \\sloppy\n \\clubpenalty4000\n \\@clubpenalty \\clubpenalty\n \\widowpenalty4000%\n \\sfcode`\\.\\@m\n}{%\n \\endlist\\par\\endgroup%\n \\ifaa@longauth\\kern6pt\\hrule\\kern6pt\\aainstitutename\\aa@longauthfalse\\fi%\n \\ifaa@referee\\if!\\csname appendix\\endcsname!\\relax\\else\\listofobjects\\fi\\fi\n \\def\\@noitemerr{\\ClassWarning{aa}{Empty `thebibliography' environment}}%\n}\n\\def \\@floatboxreset {%\n \\reset@font\n \\ifx\\@captype\\aa@tabtype\n \\small\n \\spacetab\n \\fi\n \\@setnobreak\n \\@setminipage\n}\n\\def\\spacetab{%\n\\abovedisplayshortskip-10pt%\n\\belowdisplayshortskip0pt%\n}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand{\\ion}[2]{\\textup{#1\\,\\textsc{\\lowercase{#2}}}}\n\\newcommand*\\element[1][]{%\n \\def\\aa@element@tr{#1}%\n \\aa@element\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@element[1][]{%\n \\def\\aa@element@tl{#1}%\n \\aa@@element\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@@element[1][]{%\n \\def\\aa@element@bl{#1}%\n \\aa@@@element\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@@@element[2][]{%\n \\def\\aa@element@br{#1}%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\vphantom{x}^{\\aa@element@tl}_{\\aa@element@bl}\n \\mathrm{#2}\n \\vphantom{x}^{\\aa@element@tr}_{\\aa@element@br}\n }%\n}\n\\renewcommand*\\vec[1]{\\ensuremath{\\boldsymbol{#1}}}\n\\newcommand*\\tens[1]{\\ensuremath{\\mathsf{#1}}}\n\\newcommand*\\sq{%\n \\ifmmode\n \\Box\n \\else\n \\begingroup\n \\unskip\\nobreak\n \\hfil\n \\penalty50\n \\hskip1em\n \\null\\nobreak\\hfil$\\Box$%\n \\parfillskip=0pt\n \\finalhyphendemerits=0\n \\endgraf\n \\endgroup\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\sun{\\ensuremath{\\odot}}\n\\newcommand*\\degr{\\ensuremath{^\\circ}}\n\\newcommand*\\arcmin{\\ensuremath{^\\prime}}\n\\newcommand*\\arcsec{\\ensuremath{^{\\prime\\prime}}}\n\\def\\utw{\\ensuremath{\\smash{\\rlap{\\lower5pt\\hbox{$\\sim$}}}}}\n\\def\\udtw{\\ensuremath{\\smash{\\rlap{\\lower6pt\\hbox{$\\approx$}}}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fd{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\text{d}}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fh{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\text{h}}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fm{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\text{m}}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fs{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\text{s}}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fdg{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\circ}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\farcm{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\prime}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\farcs{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\prime\\prime}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fp{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\scriptscriptstyle\\text{p}}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\cor{\\ensuremath{\\mathrel{\\widehat{=}}}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@centerstack[2]{%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\mathrel{%\n \\mathchoice{%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr#1\\cr#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr#1\\cr#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr#1\\cr#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr#1\\cr#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\la{\\aa@centerstack{<}{\\sim}}\n\\newcommand*\\ga{\\aa@centerstack{>}{\\sim}}\n\\newcommand*\\sol{\\aa@centerstack{\\sim}{<}}\n\\newcommand*\\sog{\\aa@centerstack{\\sim}{>}}\n\\newcommand*\\lse{\\aa@centerstack{<}{\\simeq}}\n\\newcommand*\\gse{\\aa@centerstack{>}{\\simeq}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@centerstackskip[6]{%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\mathrel{%\n \\mathchoice{%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n #1\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip#3}#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n #1\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip#4}#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n #1\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip#5}#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n #1\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip#6}#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\grole{\\aa@centerstackskip{>}{<}{-1.5\\p@}{-1.5\\p@}{-1\\p@}{-.5\\p@}}\n\\newcommand*\\leogr{\\aa@centerstackskip{<}{>}{-1.5\\p@}{-1.5\\p@}{-1\\p@}{-.5\\p@}}\n\\newcommand*\\loa{\\aa@centerstack{<}{\\approx}}\n\\newcommand*\\goa{\\aa@centerstack{>}{\\approx}}\n\\newcommand*\\diameter{%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\mathchoice{%\n \\ooalign{%\n \\hfil\\hbox{$\\displaystyle/$}\\hfil\\crcr\n {\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\mathchar\"20D$}}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\ooalign{%\n \\hfil\\hbox{$\\textstyle/$}\\hfil\\crcr\n {\\hbox{$\\textstyle\\mathchar\"20D$}}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\ooalign{%\n \\hfil\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle/$}\\hfil\\crcr\n {\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle\\mathchar\"20D$}}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\ooalign{%\n \\hfil\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle/$}\\hfil\\crcr\n {\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\mathchar\"20D$}}%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\let\\olddiameter\\diameter\n\\newcommand*\\getsto{\\aa@centerstack{\\gets}{\\to}}\n\\newcommand*\\lid{\\aa@centerstackskip{<}{=}{1.2\\p@}{1.2\\p@}{1\\p@}{0.9\\p@}}\n\\newcommand*\\gid{\\aa@centerstackskip{>}{=}{1.2\\p@}{1.2\\p@}{1\\p@}{0.9\\p@}}\n\\newcommand*\\bbbone{%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\mathchoice{\\mathrm 1\\mskip-4mu l}\n {\\mathrm 1\\mskip-4mu l}\n {\\mathrm 1\\mskip-4.5mu l}\n {\\mathrm 1\\mskip-5mu l}%\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aap{A\\&A}\n\\let\\astap=\\aap\n\\newcommand*\\aapr{A\\&A~Rev.}\n\\newcommand*\\aaps{A\\&AS}\n\\newcommand*\\actaa{Acta Astron.}\n\\newcommand*\\aj{AJ}\n\\newcommand*\\ao{Appl.~Opt.}\n\\let\\applopt\\ao\n\\newcommand*\\apj{ApJ}\n\\newcommand*\\apjl{ApJ}\n\\let\\apjlett\\apjl\n\\newcommand*\\apjs{ApJS}\n\\let\\apjsupp\\apjs\n\\newcommand*\\aplett{Astrophys.~Lett.}\n\\newcommand*\\apspr{Astrophys.~Space~Phys.~Res.}\n\\newcommand*\\apss{Ap\\&SS}\n\\newcommand*\\araa{ARA\\&A}\n\\newcommand*\\azh{AZh}\n\\newcommand*\\baas{BAAS}\n\\newcommand*\\bac{Bull. astr. Inst. Czechosl.}\n\\newcommand*\\bain{Bull.~Astron.~Inst.~Netherlands}\n\\newcommand*\\caa{Chinese Astron. Astrophys.}\n\\newcommand*\\cjaa{Chinese J. Astron. Astrophys.}\n\\newcommand*\\fcp{Fund.~Cosmic~Phys.}\n\\newcommand*\\gca{Geochim.~Cosmochim.~Acta}\n\\newcommand*\\grl{Geophys.~Res.~Lett.}\n\\newcommand*\\iaucirc{IAU~Circ.}\n\\newcommand*\\icarus{Icarus}\n\\newcommand*\\jcap{J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.}\n\\newcommand*\\jcp{J.~Chem.~Phys.}\n\\newcommand*\\jgr{J.~Geophys.~Res.}\n\\newcommand*\\jqsrt{J.~Quant.~Spectr.~Rad.~Transf.}\n\\newcommand*\\jrasc{JRASC}\n\\newcommand*\\memras{MmRAS}\n\\newcommand*\\memsai{Mem.~Soc.~Astron.~Italiana}\n\\newcommand*\\mnras{MNRAS}\n\\newcommand*\\na{New A}\n\\newcommand*\\nar{New A Rev.}\n\\newcommand*\\nat{Nature}\n\\newcommand*\\nphysa{Nucl.~Phys.~A}\n\\newcommand*\\pasa{PASA}\n\\newcommand*\\pasj{PASJ}\n\\newcommand*\\pasp{PASP}\n\\newcommand*\\physrep{Phys.~Rep.}\n\\newcommand*\\physscr{Phys.~Scr}\n\\newcommand*\\planss{Planet.~Space~Sci.}\n\\newcommand*\\pra{Phys.~Rev.~A}\n\\newcommand*\\prb{Phys.~Rev.~B}\n\\newcommand*\\prc{Phys.~Rev.~C}\n\\newcommand*\\prd{Phys.~Rev.~D}\n\\newcommand*\\pre{Phys.~Rev.~E}\n\\newcommand*\\prl{Phys.~Rev.~Lett.}\n\\newcommand*\\procspie{Proc.~SPIE}\n\\newcommand*\\qjras{QJRAS}\n\\newcommand*\\rmxaa{Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis.}\n\\newcommand*\\skytel{S\\&T}\n\\newcommand*\\solphys{Sol.~Phys.}\n\\newcommand*\\sovast{Soviet~Ast.}\n\\newcommand*\\ssr{Space~Sci.~Rev.}\n\\newcommand*\\zap{ZAp}\n\\DeclareMathAlphabet{\\mathsfsl}{OT1}{txss}{m}{sl}\n\\g@addto@macro{\\endlongtable}{\\addvspace{-3.5mm}}\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n\\@ifpackageloaded{lscape}{%\n\\g@addto@macro{\\landscape}{\\centering\\setlength{\\LTcapwidth}{\\aa@fullheight}}}{}\n\\@ifpackageloaded{pdflscape}{%\n\\g@addto@macro{\\landscape}{\\centering\\setlength{\\LTcapwidth}{\\aa@fullheight}}}{}\n\\@ifpackageloaded{aalongtable}%\n{\\def\\LS@rot{%\n \\setbox\\@outputbox\\vbox\n to\\aa@fullheight{\\vfill\\centerline{\\rotatebox{90}{\\box\\@outputbox}}\\vfill}}}{}\n\\@ifpackageloaded{subfigure}%\n{\\renewcommand*{\\thesubfigure}{\\alph{subfigure}}\n\\renewcommand*{\\@thesubfigure}{(\\thesubfigure)\\hskip\\subfiglabelskip}\n\\renewcommand*{\\@@thesubfigure}{(\\thesubfigure)}%\n\\renewcommand*{\\thesubtable}{\\alph{subtable}}\n\\renewcommand*{\\@thesubtable}{(\\thesubtable)\\hskip\\subfiglabelskip}\n\\renewcommand*{\\@@thesubtable}{(\\thesubtable)}}{}\n\\@ifpackageloaded{wasysym}%\n{\\let\\diameter\\olddiameter}{}\n\\@ifpackageloaded{txfonts}%\n{%\n \\newcommand*\\bbba{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{A}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbb{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{B}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbc{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{C}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbd{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{D}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbe{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{E}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbf{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{F}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbg{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{G}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbh{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{H}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbi{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{I}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbj{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{J}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbk{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{K}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbl{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{L}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbm{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{M}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbn{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{N}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbo{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{O}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbp{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{P}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbq{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{Q}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbr{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{R}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbs{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{S}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbt{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{T}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbu{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{U}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbv{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{V}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbw{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{W}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbx{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{X}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbby{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{Y}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbz{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{Z}}}}%\n{%\n \\newcommand*\\bbba{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{A}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbb{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{B}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbc{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{C}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbd{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{D}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbe{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{E}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbf{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{F}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbg{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{G}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbh{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{H}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbi{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{I}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbj{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{J}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbk{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{K}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbl{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{L}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbm{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{M}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbn{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{N}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbo{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{O}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbp{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{P}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbq{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{Q}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbr{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{R}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbs{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{S}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbt{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{T}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbu{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{U}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbv{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{V}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbw{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{W}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbx{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{X}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbby{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{Y}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbz{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{Z}}}}\n}\n\\setlength\\leftmargini {\\parindent}\n\\leftmargin \\leftmargini\n\\setlength\\leftmarginii {\\parindent}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiii {1.87em}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiv {1.7em}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginv {.5em}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginvi {.5em}\n\\setlength \\labelsep {.5em}\n\\setlength \\labelwidth{\\leftmargini}\n\\addtolength\\labelwidth{-\\labelsep}\n\\renewcommand\\theenumi{\\@arabic\\c@enumi}\n\\renewcommand\\theenumii{\\@alph\\c@enumii}\n\\renewcommand\\theenumiii{\\@roman\\c@enumiii}\n\\renewcommand\\theenumiv{\\@Alph\\c@enumiv}\n\\renewcommand\\labelenumi{\\theenumi.}\n\\renewcommand\\labelenumii{(\\theenumii)}\n\\renewcommand\\labelenumiii{\\theenumiii.}\n\\renewcommand\\labelenumiv{\\theenumiv.}\n\\renewcommand\\p@enumii{\\theenumi}\n\\renewcommand\\p@enumiii{\\theenumi(\\theenumii)}\n\\renewcommand\\p@enumiv{\\p@enumiii\\theenumiii}\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemi{\\normalfont\\bfseries --}\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemii{\\normalfont\\bfseries --}\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemiii{$\\m@th\\bullet$}\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemiv{$\\m@th\\cdot$}\n\\def\\arxivprefixe{arXiv}\n\\def\\arxivprefixesep{:}\n\\def\\arxiv#1{%\n{\\tt \\arxivprefixe\\arxivprefixesep\\ignorespaces#1}%\n}\n\\newcommand{\\eprint}[2][]{%\n{\\tt\\if!#1!#2\\else#1\\arxivprefixesep\\ignorespaces#2\\fi}%\n}\n\\endinput\n%%\n%% End of file `aa.cls'.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: paper.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass{aa}\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\usepackage{txfonts}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{amssymb}\n\\usepackage{textcomp}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{url}\n\\usepackage{lineno}\n\\usepackage{tabularx}\n\\usepackage{gensymb}\n\\usepackage{placeins}\n\n\\newcommand{\\AP}{\\color{blue}}\n\n\\begin{document} \n\\title{Caught in the act: interaction-driven evolution in the nearby compact galaxy group Roberts Quartet (SCG0018-4854)}\n\n\\titlerunning{A Compact Quartet in Turmoil}\n\n\n \\author{Saili Keshri\n \\inst{1}\\fnmsep\\inst{2} \n \\and\n Sudhanshu Barway\n \\inst{1}\\fnmsep\\inst{2} \n \\and\n Mousumi Das\n \\inst{1}\n \\and\n Abhishek Paswan\n \\inst{3}\n }\n\n \\institute{Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Kormangala II Block, Bengaluru, India, 560034\\\\\n \\email{saili.keshri@iiap.res.in}\n \\and\n Department of Physics, Pondicherry University, R.V.Nagar, Kalapet, Puducherry, India, 605014\\\\\n \\and\n Department of Physics, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj 211002, Uttar Pradesh, India\n }\n\n\\abstract {We present a spatially resolved multiwavelength study of the compact galaxy group Roberts Quartet (SCG0018-4854), aimed at understanding interaction-driven galaxy evolution in dense environments. The system comprises four galaxies (NGC~87, NGC~88, NGC~89, and NGC~92) that span a range of masses and evolutionary states. Using GALEX ultraviolet imaging, DECaLS optical data, VLT/MUSE integral-field spectroscopy, and infrared observations from VISTA/VIRCAM, 2MASS, and WISE, we investigate the interplay between kinematics, star formation, and stellar populations across the group. The spatially resolved analysis reveals disturbed stellar and gas kinematics, enhanced turbulence, and asymmetric structures in all members, consistent with repeated gravitational interactions. The most massive galaxy, NGC~92, exhibits prominent tidal features, a bar, and ring-like star-forming structures, indicative of interaction-driven gas inflows. Another massive member, NGC~89, shows suppressed star formation and signatures of AGN-driven feedback, while the lower-mass galaxies NGC~88 and the dwarf galaxy NGC~87 display enhanced star formation and, in one case, kinematic decoupling between stellar and gaseous components consistent with recent gas accretion. Combining ultraviolet-based age estimates with non-parametric star formation histories, we constrain the recent interaction timescale of the group to $\\lesssim$500 Myr, whereas the crossing timescale is 424 Myr. These results indicate that Roberts Quartet is a dynamically young system undergoing ongoing assembly, where interactions, gas exchange, and feedback processes are actively shaping galaxy evolution. The dynamical complexity of the group further suggests that its present configuration may involve more than four progenitor components. In this context, the Roberts Quartet provides a valuable nearby analogue of compact, rapidly evolving groups observed at high redshift by recent JWST observations, offering a resolved view of the physical processes governing galaxy assembly in the early Universe.} \n\n\\keywords{\ngalaxies: evolution --\ngalaxies: interactions --\ngalaxies: star formation --\ngalaxies: active galactic nuclei --\ngalaxies: groups: individual: SCG0018-4854 (NGC 87, NGC 88, NGC 89, NGC 92) --\ntechniques: imaging spectroscopy\n}\n \n\\maketitle\n\\nolinenumbers \n\n\\section{Introduction}\\label{sec:Sec_1}\n\nThe processes of galaxy formation and transformation are crucial to their evolution. According to the hierarchical galaxy formation model, interactions between small galaxies at high redshift form the basis for the formation of present-day galaxies \\citep{Toomre72}. Thus, detailed studies of local interacting and merging systems offer valuable insights into phenomena prevalent in the distant universe. Multiple studies have compared properties (for example, gas mass and star formation rate) of galaxies in the local and distant universe and found they evolved with redshift \\citep{Mannucci10, Behroozi13, Madau14, Boyett22}. Thus, it is more relevant to compare the physical processes and phenomena than the comparison of the absolute values. Interacting and merging systems are unique laboratories to understand the galaxy transformation; however, to have a complete picture, it is imperative to combine observational results with simulations. \\citet{Barnes1992} and subsequent numerical studies \\citep[e.g.,][]{Springel2005, DiMatteo2007, DiMatteo2008, Bekki2011} have shown that repeated interactions and mergers in dense environments can trigger a chain of evolutionary transformations. Tidal forces redistribute angular momentum, drive gas inflows toward galactic centres, and compress the interstellar medium, inducing circumnuclear starbursts \\citep{Scott2014, Bitsakis2011, Jyoti23}. These inflows can also feed central supermassive black holes, igniting active galactic nuclei (AGN) and potentially initiating feedback that quenches further star formation \\citep{Weigel2018}. Over time, the depletion of cold gas and tidal heating transform gas-rich, late-type galaxies into red, quiescent early-type systems \\citep{VerdesMontenegro2001}. Compact groups (CGs), therefore, serve as nearby analogues of the high-redshift universe, where interactions were more frequent \\citep{RodriguezBaras2014}.\n\nCGs of galaxies consist of a small number of galaxies, typically four to seven, separated by projected distances of only a few tens of kiloparsecs and have low velocity dispersions of $\\approx$200 km/s \\citep{Hickson1982, Hickson1992}. Such proximity leads to strong gravitational interactions, frequent encounters, and a high probability of mergers occurring over relatively short timescales. As a result, they play an important role in the environment-driven evolution of galaxies \\citep{Mendes-de-Oliveira94, Coziol07}. Observationally, CGs show remarkable diversity in morphology and activity, from irregular and spiral systems with intense star formation to lenticular and elliptical galaxies that are dynamically relaxed and quiescent \\citep[][and references therein]{Hickson97}. Multiwavelength studies reveal that many CGs contain both gas-rich and gas-poor members within the same environment \\citep{Bitsakis2014, Walker2010}. Star formation frequently occurs in tidal bridges, producing patchy UV and H$\\alpha$ emission \\citep{deMello2008, Tzanavaris2010}. Some galaxies display rejuvenated star formation from fresh gas accretion or interaction-induced inflows \\citep{Gallagher2008, TorresFlores2014}, while others exhibit AGN-driven suppression or morphological quenching \\citep{Plana2020}. A higher incidence of AGN has been reported in CGs relative to field galaxies \\citep{Coziol1998, Martinez2010, Sohn2013}, with the prevalence of nuclear activity often correlating with signs of tidal perturbation. This mixture of morphologies and activity levels reflects different evolutionary stages within a single gravitationally bound system, demonstrating how CGs evolve through cycles of star formation, merger-induced transformation, and feedback. \n\nDynamical models predict that galaxies in groups undergo strong interactions and merge on a dynamical time scale \\citep{Barnes85, Governato96}. However, major mergers are rare in CGs \\citep{Mendes-de-Oliveira94}. CG galaxies preferentially merge in a dry condition, after losing most of their gas through interactions \\citep{Coziol07}. This scenario is supported by HI observations showing disturbed distributions in CGs \\citep{VerdesMontenegro2001}, implying that their evolution is driven primarily by galaxy interactions and tidal stripping. Thus, it is important to reconstruct the evolutionary and interaction history of CGs by examining the properties of their member galaxies and relating them to the global properties of the group. An integral-field spectroscopy study will help us to reveal complex velocity fields and ionisation structures consistent with recent interactions. Such evidence supports the view that compact configurations accelerate both star formation and black-hole growth.\n\nIn this work, we present a detailed multiwavelength analysis of the Southern Compact Group SCG0018-4854 \\citep{Iovino02} or Robert’s Quartet (RQ hereafter), combining UV, optical (including imaging and integral-field spectroscopy), and IR data. RQ is a CG of galaxies located at a distance of $\\sim$44.7 Mpc \\citep{Mould00} (At the distance of RQ, 1\\arcsec = 0.217 kpc). It comprises four morphologically diverse galaxies: NGC 87, NGC 88, NGC 89 and NGC 92 \\citep{Presotto10} and details of each galaxy are given in Table~\\ref{tab:morp}. Prominent tidal tails, disturbed morphologies, and extended UV and H$\\alpha$ emission across the group indicate signatures of both ongoing and past interactions. The group is also found to have a common envelope of HI gas around the galaxies \\citep{Pompei07}. All four galaxies are embedded in a hot intergalactic medium (KT $\\approx$ 0.2 keV) as detected by X-ray observation \\citep{Trinchieri08}. The diversity of morphologies and activity within this compact system provides an ideal opportunity to understand how tidal interactions, gas inflows, and AGN feedback collectively shape galaxy evolution in a dense, low-velocity dispersion environment. We aim to investigate the spatially resolved kinematics, star formation and stellar populations of its member galaxies and to explore how interaction-driven processes influence their current evolutionary states. \n\nThe paper is organised as follows: Sect. ~\\ref{sec:data} describes the datasets, Sect. ~\\ref{sec:analysis} explains the methods used for our analysis. The results are presented in Sect. ~\\ref{sec:result} followed by a discussion in Sect. \\ref{sec:Disc}. Our main conclusions are presented in Sect. \\ref{sec:Conc}. We adopt a flat $\\Lambda$CDM cosmology with $\\Omega_M=0.3$, $\\Omega_\\Lambda=0.7$, and $H_0=70$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ throughout this study.\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.8\\linewidth]{fig/IMAGE.pdf}\n \\caption{Optical image of RQ. The blue squares show the locations of the MUSE-DEEP IFU datacube footprints. The optical image is taken from the DECaLS \\citep{Dey19}. North is up, and east is towards the left.}\n \\label{fig:group}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n \\centering\n \\caption{Details of the galaxies of RQ group.}\n \\begin{tabular}{lcccr}\n \\hline\n \\textbf{Source} & \\textbf{R.A} & \\textbf{Dec} & \\textbf{Velocity} \\\\\n & (hh mm ss) & (dd mm ss) & (km/s)\\\\\n \\hline\n NGC 87 & 00 21 14.21 & -48 37 42.81 & 3426 $\\pm$ 2.5 \\\\\n NGC 88 & 00 21 22.06 & -48 38 25.21 & 3409 $\\pm$ 3.9 \\\\ \n NGC 89 & 00 21 24.36 & -48 39 54.88 & 3295 $\\pm$ 2.9 \\\\\n NGC 92 & 00 21 31.66 & -48 37 28.82 & 3362 $\\pm$ 14 \\\\\n \\hline\n \\end{tabular}\n \\begin{flushleft}\n \\footnotesize\n \\textbf{Description:} {Columns 2 and 3 are the coordinates of galaxies in J2000. The radial velocity is tabulated in column 4. The coordinates are listed from NED, and the velocity is estimated from MUSE data cubes.}\n \\end{flushleft}\n \\label{tab:morp}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\caption{Details of the archival imaging data used in this work.}\n\\resizebox{\\columnwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{lcccr}\n\\hline\n\\textbf{Telescope/} & \\textbf{Filter} & \\textbf{Spatial sampling} & \\textbf{FWHM} & \\textbf{Point-source limit}\\\\\n\\textbf{Survey} & & (arcsec/pixel) & (arcsec) & ($5\\sigma^{*}$/$10\\sigma^{**}$, AB mag)\\\\\n\\hline\nGALEX & FUV & 1.50 & 4.20 & 22.60$^{*}$ \\\\\nGALEX & NUV & 1.50 & 5.30 & 22.70$^{*}$ \\\\\nDECaLS & g & 0.26 & 0.97 & 23.95$^{*}$ \\\\\nDECaLS & r & 0.26 & 0.83 & 23.54$^{*}$ \\\\\nDECaLS & i & 0.26 & 0.77 & 23.80$^{*}$ \\\\\nDECaLS & z & 0.26 & 0.87 & 22.50$^{*}$ \\\\\n2MASS & J & 1.0 & 2.89 & 16.71$^{**}$ \\\\\n2MASS & H & 1.0 & 2.83 & 16.49$^{**}$ \\\\\n2MASS & Ks & 1.0 & 2.98 & 16.15$^{**}$ \\\\\nVISTA & Ks & 0.34 & 1.12 & 20.36$^{*}$ \\\\\nWISE & W1 & 1.38 & 6.08 & 19.20$^{*}$ \\\\\nWISE & W2 & 1.38 & 6.84 & 18.84$^{*}$ \\\\\nWISE & W3 & 1.38 & 7.36 & 16.37$^{*}$\\\\\nWISE & W4 & 1.38 & 11.99 & 14.52$^{*}$ \\\\\n\\hline\n\\end{tabular}\n}\n\\begin{flushleft}\n\\footnotesize\n\\textbf{References.} GALEX: \\citet{Morrissey07};\nDECaLS: \\citet{Dey19};\n2MASS: \\citet{Skrutskie06};\nVISTA: \\citet{Sutherland15};\nWISE: \\citet{Wright10}.\n\\end{flushleft}\n\\label{tab:data}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{figure*}\n\\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=12cm]{fig/g-band_with_contour.pdf}\n \\caption{Multi-wavelength view of the RQ galaxies. DECaLS g-band images of (a) NGC 92, (b) NGC 89, (c) NGC 88, and (d) NGC 87 are presented with MUSE H$\\alpha$ (black) and GALEX FUV (white) contours overlaid.}\n \\label{fig:group_ind}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\section{Data} \\label{sec:data}\nTo investigate the stellar and ionised gas properties of the galaxies in RQ, we combined ultraviolet, optical, and infrared data from multiple archives, each probing a complementary aspect of the system’s evolution. The datasets are briefly described below.\n\\paragraph{Ultraviolet imaging:}\nThe far- and near-ultraviolet (FUV, NUV) images were obtained from the \\textit{Galaxy Evolution Explorer} (\\textit{GALEX}) archive, which is a NASA UV space telescope that works in imaging and spectroscopy modes. It has two imaging filters, FUV (1344-1786 Å) and NUV (1771-2831 Å) \\citep{Morrissey07}. GALEX observed RQ on 2005-09-09 and 2005-09-25 in NUV and FUV filters, with exposure times of 7419 and 4060 seconds, respectively. We accessed the science-ready data through the MAST portal \\footnote{https://mast.stsci.edu/portal/Mashup/Clients/Mast/Portal.html}. The UV emission traces recent star formation (up to 300 Myr), enabling us to identify young stellar complexes and tidal star-forming regions within the group. \n\\paragraph{Optical imaging:}\nDeep $g$, $r$, $i$, and $z$-band optical images were taken from the Dark Energy Camera Legacy Survey (DECaLS; \\citealt{Dey19}) Data Release 10 (DR10). The data reach an approximate 5$\\sigma$ depth of $g = 23.72$, $r = 23.27$, $i = 23.50$ and $z = 22.22$ AB mag for a galaxy with an exponential disc profile and a half-light radius of 0.45 arcsec. The high surface-brightness ($\\mu_{r} \\approx 29$ $mag/arcse^{2}$) sensitivity of DECaLS enables the detection of faint tidal features and low-surface-brightness structures, providing constraints on morphological disturbances and stellar mass distributions.\n\\paragraph{Optical integral-field spectroscopy:}\nOptical integral-field spectroscopic data were obtained from the Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE; \\citealt{Bacon2010}) at the ESO Very Large Telescope (VLT). MUSE datacube covers 4750–9350 \\AA~range with a mean spectral resolution of R$\\sim3000$ and spatial sampling of 0.2\\arcsec/pixel over a 1\\arcmin$\\times$1\\arcmin field of view. The science-ready MUSE-DEEP data cube of the galaxy group was retrieved from the ESO science archive portal \\footnote{https://archive.eso.org/scienceportal/home}. The galaxy group was observed from 2018-05-09 to 2018-07-20, and the program ID is 0101.C-0329. The MUSE-DEEP datacube footprint of the galaxy group is shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:group}, where the optical image is taken from DECaLS \\citep{Dey19}. In this work, we utilise datacube 2 of the four available datacubes covering NGC 92 to investigate the stellar and gas kinematics along with stellar population properties of the central region of NGC 92. Additionally, we have utilised datacube 3 to constrain the gas-phase metallicity of the tail. We have also used all four datacubes to produce an H$\\alpha$ image of NGC 92.\n\\paragraph{Infrared imaging:}\nNear-infrared ($J$, $H$, $Ks$) images were retrieved from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS, \\citet{Skrutskie06}) Extended Source Catalogue and mid-infrared (W1 (3.4 $\\mu$m), W2 (4.6 $\\mu$m), W3 (12 $\\mu$m), and W4 (24 $\\mu$m)) data were taken from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE, \\citet{Wright10}). The measurements obtained from the 2MASS images were converted to flux units using scaling factors given in the respective image headers. For WISE, we used the scaling factors available in its documentation. We have also utilised high resolution $Ks$-band images from VISTA InfraRed CAMera (VIRCAM) with a 1.65$\\degree$ field of view at Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA) \\citep{Sutherland15}. Detailed information on the data used in this work is given in Table~\\ref{tab:data}.\n\n\\section{Analysis} \\label{sec:analysis}\nThe analysis combines morphological, photometric, and spectroscopic diagnostics to characterise the stellar and gas kinematics and stellar populations of the RQ member galaxies. It allows us to construct a coherent view of how tidal interactions, gas flows, and feedback shape their current evolutionary state.\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=9cm, height = 7.5cm]{fig/MUSE92_kinematics.jpeg}\n \\caption{Spatially resolved maps of the stellar and gas kinematics of NGC 92 derived from MUSE observations. Top row: (a) Stellar velocity, (b) Velocity dispersion ($\\sigma_{*}$), Bottom row: (c) Ionised gas (H$\\alpha$) velocity, (d) Gas velocity dispersion ($\\sigma_{H\\alpha}$). In each panel, north is up and east is towards the left.}\n \\label{fig:NGC92_kin}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure*}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=18cm, height =8cm]{fig/NGC92_spectra.pdf}\n \\caption{Left: DECaLS g-band image of NGC 92. Right: The MUSE spectra for nuclei 1 (blue) and nuclei 2 (orange) from the left panel, with zoomed-in views highlighting the H$\\alpha$ and [NII] emission lines. Gaussian profiles are used to model these lines to calculate the redshifts for both nuclei.}\n \\label{fig:92_spectra}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\subsection{Global Properties using SED modelling}\\label{sec:sed}\nTo characterise the global properties of NGC 87, NGC 88, NGC 89, and NGC 92, we performed broadband spectral energy distribution (SED) modelling. The analysis required multi-band photometry, which was obtained by convolving all images to match the \\textit{WISE} W4 point-spread function (PSF). Source detection and segmentation maps were generated using the \\texttt{SExtractor} software \\citep{Bertin96}, adopting a detection threshold of 3$\\sigma$ on the \\textit{DECaLS} $g$-band image of each galaxy. The resulting segmentation maps were applied uniformly across all other bands to extract consistent flux measurements. Photometry was obtained in 13 bands spanning from the UV to the mid-IR: \\textit{GALEX} (FUV, NUV), \\textit{DECaLS} ($g$, $r$, $i$, $z$), 2MASS ($J$, $H$, $Ks$), and \\textit{WISE} (W1, W2, W3, W4). In addition, VISTA $Ks$-band imaging was only used for the structural decomposition and GALFIT modelling owing to its higher spatial resolution.\n\nThe observed UV–optical–IR SEDs were modelled using the \\texttt{Code Investigating GALaxy Emission} (\\texttt{CIGALE}; \\citealt{Boquien19}), which implements the energy-balance principle for SED fitting to derive key physical properties such as the star formation rate (SFR), stellar mass ($M_{\\star}$), stellar population age, dust attenuation, and star formation history (SFH) parameters. \\texttt{CIGALE} constructs model spectra through a Bayesian analysis framework by combining multiple physical modules. We adopted a delayed SFH with an optional burst/quench component (\\texttt{sfhdelayeddbq}), coupled with \\citet{Bruzual03} single stellar population (SSP) models assuming a Salpeter initial mass function (IMF; \\citealt{Salpeter55}) with mass limits of 0.1–100 $M_{\\odot}$. The nebular emission from the interstellar medium was modelled using the \\texttt{nebular} module, and dust attenuation was treated using the modified starburst law of \\citet{Calzetti00} with zero UV bump amplitude. Infrared emission from dust heated by stellar radiation was modelled using the dust emission models of \\citet{Draine07, Draine14}. To account for the contribution from an active galactic nucleus (AGN), we included the \\texttt{SKIRTOR} models of \\citet{Stalevski16}. A summary of the \\texttt{CIGALE} modules and their corresponding input parameters is presented in Table~\\ref{tab:sed}. The derived stellar masses and global star formation rates for all four member galaxies are summarised in Table~\\ref{tab:sed_out}.\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n \\centering\n \\caption{Stellar mass (M$_{*}$) and SFR derived from broad-band SED analysis.}\n \\begin{tabular}{lcr}\n \\hline\n Source & Stellar mass & SFR \\\\\n & ($M_{\\odot}$) & ($M_{\\odot}$yr$^{-1}$)\\\\\n \\hline\n NGC 87 & 1.87 $\\times$ 10$^{9}$ & 1.57 $\\pm$ 0.19 \\\\\n NGC 88 & 6.26 $\\times$ 10$^{9}$ & 0.39 $\\pm$ 0.05 \\\\ \n NGC 89 & 2.70 $\\times$ 10$^{10}$ & 0.16 $\\pm$ 0.03 \\\\\n NGC 92 & 5.61 $\\times$ 10$^{10}$ & 1.08 $\\pm$ 0.14\\\\\n \\hline\n \\end{tabular}\n \\label{tab:sed_out}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\subsection{MUSE data cube analysis}\\label{sec:MUSE}\nWe utilised the MUSE WFM-NOAO (Wide Field Mode, no adaptive optics) science-ready data cube of the RQ for the spectroscopic analysis. The data were processed using version 3.1.0 of the \\texttt{Galaxy IFU Spectroscopy Tool} (\\texttt{GIST}; \\citealt{Bittner19}), a comprehensive framework designed for analysing fully reduced integral-field spectroscopic observations. The \\texttt{GIST} pipeline employs the penalised pixel-fitting code (\\texttt{pPXF}; \\citealt{Cappellari04, Cappellari17, Cappellari2022}) to derive the stellar line-of-sight velocity distribution (LOSVD) and associated stellar kinematics, while the Gas and Absorption Line Fitting (\\texttt{GandALF}) module \\citep{Sarzi06, Falcon06} is used to fit emission lines and extract gaseous kinematics and line fluxes. Spatial binning was performed using the Voronoi tessellation method \\citep{Cappellari03} within the wavelength range 480–700 nm to achieve a target signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of 40 per bin. The S/N is computed for each unbinned spaxel per spectral pixel ($\\approx$ per \\AA) within the selected wavelength range. Spaxels with S/N $<$ 3 are excluded from the binning process to minimise the contribution of noisy data before binning. The remaining spaxels are then adaptively combined until the target S/N of 40 per bin is reached, whereas individual spaxels with S/N $>$ 40 were left unbinned. All spectra were subsequently corrected for galactic extinction in the direction of the target. A detailed discussion on MUSE analysis is presented in \\citet{Keshri25b, Keshri25a}. \n\n\\subsubsection{Non-parametric Star Formation History}\nWe derived global properties for each member of the group using SED modelling of multi-band images, which is discussed in detail in Sec~\\ref{sec:sed}. Here we utilised MUSE cube to derive spatially resolved mass-weighted stellar populations and star formation histories (SFHs) of each galaxy in RQ using the SFH module of the \\texttt{GIST} pipeline. This module employs the \\texttt{pPXF} algorithm to perform a regularised full spectral fit, enabling the recovery of non-parametric SFHs and stellar population properties. The analysis was carried out on emission-line-subtracted spectra to ensure a robust continuum fit. Fitting was performed over the wavelength range 480–550 nm, incorporating an eighth-order multiplicative Legendre polynomial to correct for residual continuum mismatches between the observed and template spectra. The spectral modelling used a linear combination of templates from the MILES library \\citep{Vazdekis10}, which spans stellar ages from 0.03 to 14 Gyr and metallicities ([M/H]) in the range of -2.27 to +0.40. The models are based on the BaSTI isochrones \\citep{Pietrinferni04, Pietrinferni06, Pietrinferni09, Pietrinferni13} and assume a revised Kroupa initial mass function (IMF; \\citealt{Kroupa01}).\n\n\\subsubsection{Gas-Phase Metallicity Analysis}\nTo estimate the spatially resolved oxygen abundance across all galaxies, we derived the gas-phase metallicity ($Z_{\\mathrm{gas}}$) using the N2 diagnostic of \\citet{Pettini04}, expressed as\n\n\\begin{equation}\n12 + \\log(\\mathrm{O/H}) = 8.9 + 0.57 \\times \\log(\\mathrm{N2}),\n\\label{eq:gas-phase}\n\\end{equation}\n\nwhere N2 represents the flux ratio of the [NII] $\\lambda6583$ to H$\\alpha$ emission lines. For reference, the solar metallicity corresponds to $12 + \\log(\\mathrm{O/H}) = 8.66$ \\citep{Asplund06}.\n\nThe N2 index is highly sensitive to the gas-phase oxygen abundance, responding to both ionisation and chemical effects. When (O/H) falls below the solar value, the ionisation parameter and/or hardness of the ionising radiation typically increase, leading to a decrease in the [NII]/[NIII] ratio. Conversely, at higher abundances, the secondary nature of nitrogen causes the (N/O) ratio to decline. These dependencies make N2 an efficient proxy for tracing metallicity variations. Using the resulting $Z_{\\mathrm{gas}}$ maps, we investigated the radial and spatial metallicity gradients across each member of RQ, as discussed in the following sections.\n\n\\begin{figure*}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=18cm, height = 4.5cm]{fig/SB_92.pdf}\n \\caption{Output of the GALFIT model along with the azimuthally averaged surface brightness profile of NGC 92. (a) $Ks$-band image of the galaxy, (b) corresponding best-fit model, (c) residual image and (d) azimuthally averaged surface brightness of the best-fitting ellipses are plotted as a function of the semi-major axis (solid points), with the error bars representing the rms uncertainty of the intensity measured along each fitted isophote. The surface brightness profiles are decomposed into two Sérsic components and one exponential component, corresponding to a bulge (red dashed line), a bar (magenta dashed line), and a disc (blue dashed line). The black solid line shows the combined contribution of all three components.}\n \\label{fig:SB}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=9cm, height = 8cm]{fig/MUSE92_SFH.jpeg}\n \\caption{Spatially resolved maps of stellar population properties of NGC 92 derived from MUSE observations. (a) Mass-weighted stellar age, (b) Stellar metallicity ([M/H]), (c) Gas-phase metallicity (12 + log(O/H)), (d) Average mass-weighted star formation history (SFH) of the galaxy as a function of lookback time is presented. The red curve shows the mean SFH, while the shaded region represents the 16th–84th percentile range, indicating the spatial variation in SFH across the galaxy. The SFH is normalised to its peak value.}\n\\label{fig:NGC92_sfh}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsubsection{BPT and WHAN classification}\nUnderstanding the relative contributions of star formation and AGN activity in interacting systems is essential for disentangling the physical processes governing galaxy evolution. Interactions can compress the interstellar medium, triggering enhanced star formation, while also driving gas inflows that feed central supermassive black holes. To examine the dominant ionisation mechanisms within the galaxies of RQ, we employed spatially resolved emission-line diagnostics derived from the MUSE IFU data. Emission-line fluxes extracted from the MUSE cube were used to construct Baldwin–Phillips–Terlevich (BPT; \\citealt{Baldwin81}) diagrams, which classify the ionisation sources based on characteristic nebular emission-line ratios. We used [OIII]$\\lambda5007$/H$\\beta$ versus [NII] $\\lambda6583$/H$\\alpha$ flux ratios, measured for each Voronoi bin across the MUSE field of view. These ratios separate regions ionised by hot, young stars in HII regions from those excited by harder radiation fields typically associated with AGN. The theoretical upper limit for pure star-forming regions was defined by \\citet{Kewley01} using stellar population synthesis and photoionisation models. Galaxies located above this curve cannot be explained by star formation alone and are attributed to AGN-dominated ionisation. Large spectroscopic surveys, such as the SDSS, have shown that galaxies populate the BPT plane in a characteristic “seagull-shaped” distribution \\citep{Kauffmann03}. The left branch corresponds to ionisation due to star formation, the right to AGN-dominated systems, and the intermediate “composite” region represents mixed ionisation from both mechanisms. The AGN branch itself bifurcates into a high-ionisation Seyfert sequence and a low-ionisation LINER sequence \\citep{Schawinski07}, reflecting different physical excitation processes such as low-luminosity AGN, shock heating, or ionisation by evolved stars. We derived spatially resolved BPT classifications for the RQ galaxies. This approach enables us to map the spatial variation of ionisation mechanisms, identifying regions dominated by star formation, AGN activity, or a composite of both across the group members.\n\nAn important caveat in interpreting BPT diagnostics concerns the origin of emission-line ratios traditionally classified as LINER-like. \\citet{Stasinska08} demonstrated that “retired galaxies (RG)”, which have ceased star formation, can occupy the same region of the BPT diagram as LINERs. In these systems, the ionising photons are not necessarily produced by accretion onto a supermassive black hole but may instead arise from hot, low-mass evolved stars, such as post-asymptotic giant branch (post-AGB) stars or white dwarfs, that can ionise the surrounding interstellar medium and produce optical line ratios similar to those of LINERs. Consequently, a significant fraction of galaxies located along the LINER branch of the BPT “right wing” may represent retired systems rather than genuine AGN. To mitigate this ambiguity, \\citet{Cid11} introduced the WHAN diagram, which combines the [NII]/H$\\alpha$ flux ratio with the equivalent width (EW) of H$\\alpha$. This approach provides a more robust separation between true AGN and ionisation from evolved stellar populations. The inclusion of H$\\alpha$ EW effectively distinguishes weak AGN (wAGN) from RGs (galaxies that have stopped forming stars and whose residual gas is ionised by their low-mass hot evolved stars) and passive galaxies (galaxies with no emission lines), thereby refining the classification of low-ionisation spectra beyond the limits of the traditional BPT framework.\n\n\\subsection{Dynamical state of RQ}\\label{sec:dynamics}\nThe convenient way of estimating the dynamical state of a group is to measure the dimensionless crossing time, $H_{0}t_{c}$, where $H_{0}$ is the Hubble-Lemaitre constant. It measures the time taken by a galaxy to pass through the group and is estimated using the relation given by \\citet{Hickson1992} as follows:\n\n\\begin{equation}\n t_{c} = \\frac{4R}{\\pi \\sigma_{3D}}\n \\label{eq:time}\n\\end{equation}\n\nwhere R represents the median of the 2D galaxy-galaxy separation vector in kpc. We measured it by estimating the separation between each galaxy in arcsec, then determined the median of these separations in arcsec and converted it to the linear distance in kpc using the distance of RQ. $\\sigma_{3D}$ is the 3D velocity dispersion and is defined as $\\sigma_{3D} = \\left[3\\left(\\langle v^2 \\rangle - \\langle v \\rangle^2 - \\langle \\delta v^2 \\rangle\\right)\\right]^{1/2}$, where $<v>$ is the average of the radial velocities of each galaxy in the group and $<\\delta v^{2}>$ is the average of velocity errors squared. We utilised velocity and error as given in Table~\\ref{tab:morp}.\n\nWe also estimated the LOS velocity dispersion ($\\sigma_{G}$) of the group using a variant of the gapper estimator as described by \\citet{Beers90}, since it is less biased for groups with a small number of members compared to the standard deviation. The method involves sorting the velocities ($v_{i}$) of each galaxy in ascending order and defining the gap as\n\\begin{equation}\n g_{i} = v_{i+1} - v{i},\\qquad i = 1,2,...N-1\n \\label{eq:gap}\n\\end{equation}\nThen, the rest-frame LOS $\\sigma_{G}$ is estimated using the relation given by \\citet{yang05, Zheng21}\n\\begin{equation}\n \\sigma_{G} = \\frac{\\sqrt{\\pi}}{(1+z)N(N-1)}\\sum_{i=1}^{N-1} w_{i}g_{i}\n \\label{eq:dispersion}\n\\end{equation}\nHere $z$ is the CG redshift, and $w_{i}$ is the weight defined as $w{i}$ = $i(N-i)$, where N represents the number of members in CG.\n\nUnder the assumption that one of the galaxies is moving at the centre-of-mass velocity of the group, $\\sigma_{G}$ should be corrected by a factor of $N(N-1)$ \\citep{Eke04}. Also, redshift measurement errors increase the estimate of $\\sigma_{LOS}$; thus, it should be removed in quadrature. The $\\sigma_{LOS}$ of each group is given by\n\\begin{equation}\n \\sigma_{LOS} = \\sqrt{max \\left( 0, \\frac{N\\sigma_{G}^{2}}{N-1} - <\\delta v^{2}> \\right)}\n \\label{eq:dispersion_los}\n\\end{equation}\nOur estimates of group crossing time and velocity dispersion suggest that RQ is a dynamically young CG with a crossing time ($t_{c}$) of $\\sim$ 424 Myr ($log(H_{0}t_{c}) \\sim -1.52$) and a velocity dispersion of $\\sim$74 km/s.\n\n\\section{Results} \\label{sec:result}\n\nRQ provides an excellent nearby laboratory for investigating the impact of galaxy interactions on star formation, stellar populations, and gas dynamics in compact-group environments. Although the member galaxies reside within the same gravitational potential, they exhibit a wide diversity in morphology, stellar mass, star formation activity, and evolutionary state. This diversity highlights the complex and asynchronous nature of galaxy evolution in compact groups. In the following sections, we analyse each galaxy individually, focusing on its structural properties, stellar populations, ionised-gas distribution, and kinematic signatures. Together, these properties trace different stages of interaction-driven evolution and transformation within the group environment.\n\n\\begin{table}\n\t\\centering\n \\caption{Output of three-component (bulge, bar and disc) GALFIT modelling of NGC 92 in VIRCAM/VISTA $Ks$-band image.}\n\t\\begin{tabular}{lccccr}\n\t\t\\hline\n \\hline\n Bulge & R$_{e}$ (kpc) & 0.28 \\\\\n & n & 0.65\\\\\n \\hline\n Bar & R$_{e}$ (kpc) & 1.23 \\\\\n & n & 0.62 \\\\\n \\hline\n Disc & R$_{s}$ (kpc) & 2.31 \\\\ \n \\hline\t\t\n\t\\end{tabular}\n \\begin{flushleft}\n \\footnotesize\n \\textbf{Description:} {R$_e$ is the effective radius in kpc for the bulge and bar, R$_s$ is the disc scale length in kpc, and n is the Sersic index.}\n \\end{flushleft}\n\t\\label{tab:galfit}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=9cm, height = 8cm]{fig/gas_phase_metallicity_tail.jpeg}\n \\caption{Spatially resolved gas-phase metallicity (12 + log(O/H)) of NGC 92 tail (cube 3 of Fig.~\\ref{fig:group}).}\n\\label{fig:NGC92_tail}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{NGC 92}\nNGC~92 is the most massive and actively star-forming member of RQ, with a stellar mass of $\\sim5.6\\times10^{10}~M_{\\odot}$ and a total SFR of $\\sim$1.1 $M_{\\odot}~{\\rm yr^{-1}}$, as derived from SED modelling. The \\textit{GALEX} FUV imaging reveals six prominent star-forming clumps in the galaxy, including the tidal tail, which is extending up to $\\sim$30 kpc \\citep{Temporin05}. The derived ages of these clumps range from 27 to 204 Myr, with the central clump having an age of $\\sim$204 Myr (Fig.~\\ref{fig:age_NGC92}). The tidal tail has also been detected in X-ray observations of the group \\citep{Trinchieri08}.\n\nIn optical images, NGC~92 exhibits a morphology reminiscent of a ring structure. Interactions are known to produce ring-like morphologies when an intruder passes close to a massive gas-rich disc galaxy \\citep{Lynds76, Theys76}. Such encounters can additionally generate one-armed or asymmetric tidal structures, as demonstrated in the simulations of \\citet{Toomre78}, whose final configurations closely resemble the morphology of NGC~92. The galaxy also hosts a candidate tidal dwarf galaxy within the tidal tail \\citep{Torres-Flores09}, a double nucleus \\citep{Danks81}, and a prominent dust lane. These features collectively indicate that NGC~92 is undergoing strong interaction-driven evolution and likely plays a central role in shaping the dynamical state of the group.\n\nTo investigate the nature of the central structure in NGC~92, we examine the stellar and ionised-gas kinematics derived from the MUSE data. The stellar line-of-sight velocity field within the central $36\\arcsec \\times 36\\arcsec$ region (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC92_kin}a) exhibits a well-ordered rotational pattern with amplitudes reaching $\\pm$150 km/s. While the velocity field is broadly regular at intermediate radii, the innermost region shows subtle twists in the zero-velocity curve and isophotal asymmetries, suggesting the presence of non-axisymmetric structures such as a bar or perturbations induced by recent tidal interactions.\n\nThe H$\\alpha$ velocity field (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC92_kin}c) broadly follows the stellar rotation pattern, although stronger asymmetries are observed in the central region. Within this region, we identify two high surface-brightness components (hereafter nuclei~1 and nuclei~2), marked in the left panel of Fig.~\\ref{fig:92_spectra}. The right panel of Fig.~\\ref{fig:92_spectra} shows the integrated spectra extracted from these nuclei, together with a zoomed-in view of the H$\\alpha$ $\\lambda6563$\\AA\\ and [NII] $\\lambda\\lambda6548,6583$\\AA\\ emission lines used for the redshift measurements. Gaussian fitting yields systemic redshifts of $z_{\\rm nuclei1}=0.011352\\pm0.00006$ and $z_{\\rm nuclei2}=0.010879\\pm0.00004$, corresponding to a velocity offset of $\\sim$140 km/s. Although this offset could initially suggest dynamically distinct components, both nuclei lie along the same large-scale rotational gradient in the stellar and gas velocity fields (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC92_kin}a,c), with no clear evidence for kinematic decoupling. This indicates that the observed velocity difference is consistent with internal motions within the rotating disc rather than two separate galaxies.\n\nTo further investigate the central structure of NGC~92, we analysed the near-infrared morphology using the VIRCAM/VISTA $Ks$-band image. We performed a two-dimensional photometric decomposition with GALFIT \\citep{Peng02}. A detailed description of the decomposition methodology is provided in \\citet{Keshri25a}, and the same procedure was adopted here to model the bulge, bar, and disc components. The bulge and bar were fitted with Sérsic profiles, while the disc was modelled with an exponential profile. The resulting structural parameters are listed in Table~\\ref{tab:galfit}. The observed $Ks$-band image, best-fit model, residual map, and one-dimensional surface-brightness profiles are presented in Fig.~\\ref{fig:SB}.\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=9cm, height = 7.2cm]{fig/MUSE89_kinematics.jpeg}\n \\caption{Spatially resolved maps of stellar and gas kinematics of NGC 89 derived from MUSE observations. All the panels are the same as in Figure \\ref{fig:NGC92_kin}.}\n \\label{fig:NGC89_kin}\n\\end{figure}\n\nPrevious work by \\citet{Presotto10} inferred the presence of a bar in NGC~92 based on long-slit kinematic analysis and visual inspection of $Ks$-band NIR image, although no photometric decomposition was performed. Our two-dimensional decomposition clearly reveals a prominent stellar bar with a length of 1.232 kpc. Combining the photometric and kinematic results, we find that the second \"nucleus\" does not correspond to a dynamically distinct component. Instead, it is associated with the inner spiral-arm structure, where enhanced surface brightness and projection effects likely mimic a secondary nucleus. This interpretation removes the need for a recent merger and suggests that the central morphology and kinematics of NGC~92 are primarily shaped by bar-driven dynamics and interaction-induced perturbations.\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=9cm, height = 7.5cm]{fig/MUSE89_SFH.jpeg}\n \\caption{Spatially resolved maps of stellar population properties of NGC 89 derived from MUSE observations. All the panels are the same as in Figure \\ref{fig:NGC92_sfh}.}\n \\label{fig:NGC89_sfh}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[h]\n\\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=12cm]{fig/BPT_WHAN.jpeg}\n \\caption{Ionisation diagnostic diagram of NGC 89. Top row: (left) BPT diagnostic diagram, classifying emission-line spaxels into star-forming (blue), composite (orange), LINER (green), and Seyfert (red) regions. (right) Spatial BPT map of the galaxy, showing a Seyfert-like nucleus surrounded by composite and LINER regions. Bottom row: (left) WHAN diagram plotting log([NII]/H$\\alpha$) versus H$\\alpha$ equivalent width, separating AGN, retired galaxies (RG), and star-forming regions. (right) Spatial WHAN map confirming a central strong AGN (sAGN) region surrounded by weak AGN (wAGN), RG, and SF ring-like ionisation in the disc. Contours in all spatial panels trace the white light continuum isophotes.}\n \\label{fig:BPT_WHAN_NGC89}\n\\end{figure*}\n\nThe stellar velocity dispersion map ($\\sigma_{*}$, Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC92_kin}b) further characterises the internal structure of NGC~92. Values exceeding $\\sim$120 km/s are confined to the central kiloparsec, indicating the presence of a dynamically hot central component or enhanced mass concentration. The pronounced central increase in $\\sigma_{*}$, together with the twisting of the inner velocity field, is consistent with bar-driven secular evolution that has funnelled gas toward the centre and contributed to the growth of a disc-like pseudobulge. The H$\\alpha$ velocity dispersion map ($\\sigma_{H\\alpha}$, Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC92_kin}d) reaches values above 120 km/s in the circumnuclear region, indicating strong gas turbulence. The enhanced $\\sigma_{H\\alpha}$ also traces the prominent dust lane visible in the optical image. Such dynamical disturbances are likely associated with ongoing star formation and gas inflow driven by interactions within the group.\n\nStellar population diagnostics provide further evidence for the complex evolutionary history of NGC~92. The mass-weighted age map (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC92_sfh}a) reveals an old stellar population (10-12 Gyr) concentrated in the central region, while significantly younger populations dominate the outer disc. These younger outer-disc populations are likely associated with tidally induced star formation, consistent with UV and optical imaging studies that show extended tidal features, disturbed spiral arms, and dust lanes \\citep{Torres-Flores09, Torres-Flores14}.\n\nThe stellar metallicity map (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC92_sfh}b) exhibits a pronounced radial gradient, indicating more efficient chemical enrichment in the central regions and comparatively lower metallicities in the outer disc. The gas-phase metallicity map (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC92_sfh}c) shows oxygen abundances spanning $\\sim$8.5-8.9, with localised enhancements across the disc. In contrast to the stellar component, the gas-phase metallicity distribution does not exhibit a radial gradient, suggesting efficient mixing of the ionised gas or recent inflows of lower-metallicity material that have flattened the abundance profile. The elevated gas-phase metallicities in the circumnuclear region ($\\sim$8.8--8.9) coincide with regions of enhanced $\\sigma_{H\\alpha}$, supporting a scenario in which bar-driven inflows or interaction-induced shocks concentrate enriched gas near the centre, potentially sustaining recurrent circumnuclear star formation.\n\nWe further investigated the gas-phase metallicity along the tidal tail using a modified analysis of cube~3 of NGC~92, as indicated in Fig.~\\ref{fig:group}. Voronoi binning was performed over the wavelength range 650-660 nm to achieve a target S/N of 20, while the remainder of the analysis followed the procedure described in Sec.~\\ref{sec:MUSE}. The resulting spatially resolved metallicity map is shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC92_tail}. The derived oxygen abundances span $\\sim$8.5-9.1 dex, comparable to those measured in the galaxy's central regions.\n\nPrevious slit-spectroscopy measurements of star-forming regions along the tail by \\citet{Torres-Flores14} reported slightly lower metallicities (8.45-8.67 dex). Nevertheless, both studies indicate that the disc and tidal tail share similar metallicities, implying a relatively flat abundance profile with no strong radial gradient. This suggests that enriched gas has been redistributed from the inner regions toward the outskirts, likely through recent interactions. The presence of a common HI envelope \\citep{Pompei07}, together with the stellar mass ratios of NGC~88 to NGC~92 (1:8.8) and NGC~89 to NGC~92 (1:2.2), suggests that NGC~88 is the primary interacting companion, although the possibility of contribution from NGC~89 cannot be excluded.\n\nThese interactions appear to have strongly perturbed the outer disc while largely preserving the inner structure. The presence of a stellar bar in NGC~92 is consistent with this picture and resembles systems such as the Cartwheel galaxy, where head-on collisions disrupt the outer regions while leaving the inner structure comparatively intact \\citep{Chayan24}. The combination of a stellar bar, enhanced central velocity dispersion, flattened gas-phase metallicity gradients, and young stellar populations indicates efficient gas mixing and interaction-driven gas redistribution sustaining recent star formation activity.\n\nWe also reconstructed the median SFH (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC92_sfh}d) from the full spectral fitting, providing an understanding of the mass assembly history of NGC~92. The SFH reveals two dominant phases. The first corresponds to a major early episode around $\\sim$10 Gyr ago, during which most of the stellar mass was assembled, consistent with the presence of an old population in the central region. The second component is significantly younger ($\\sim$500 Myr) and is primarily associated with the disc and ring. This recent star formation episode is likely linked to tidally induced star formation triggered by the ongoing interaction with NGC~88.\n\n\\subsection{NGC 89}\nNGC~89 is an SB0/a pec galaxy characterised by a relatively low SFR ($\\sim$0.16 $M_{\\odot}~{\\rm yr^{-1}}$) and a high stellar mass ($M_{*}\\sim2.7\\times10^{10}~M_{\\odot}$), as derived from the SED modelling. Its low SFR suggests that the galaxy is undergoing, or has recently undergone quenching, possibly driven by environmental processes such as gas stripping or internal feedback mechanisms. NGC~89 hosts a Seyfert~2 nucleus and H$\\alpha$ emitting extraplanar filamentary structures on both sides of the disc, including a $\\sim$4 kpc jet-like filament extending toward the NE \\citep{Temporin05}. The SED fitting with \\texttt{CIGALE} additionally requires an AGN component modelled using the \\texttt{SKIRTOR} template, indicating a significant contribution of nuclear activity to the infrared emission. These properties support a scenario in which AGN feedback suppresses star formation in the galaxy. Gas inflow triggered during a previous interaction with other group members may have fuelled the AGN, while the resulting feedback contributed to the decline of star formation activity. \\citet{Presotto10} estimated an interaction timescale of $\\sim$200-700 Myr between NGC~89 and NGC~92, suggesting that gas exchange between the two galaxies may be linked to both the AGN activity and the extraplanar emission. In the sSFR-M$_{*}$ plane (Fig.~\\ref{fig:ssfr-mass}), NGC~89 lies in the green-valley region, consistent with a transition or post-starburst evolutionary phase. It is also the only galaxy in the group with no HI detection \\citep{Pompei07}.\n\nThe stellar velocity field (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC89_kin}a) exhibits a regular and symmetric rotation pattern with amplitudes reaching $\\pm$150 km/s. The stellar velocity dispersion ($\\sigma_{*}$, Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC89_kin}b), shows a pronounced central peak, with values of $\\sim$80-100 km/s in the inner few arcseconds, declining to $\\sim$20-30 km/s toward the outskirts. Such elevated central $\\sigma_{*}$ values are characteristic of a dynamically hot bulge or inner spheroidal component commonly associated with AGN-host galaxies. The H$\\alpha$ velocity field (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC89_kin}c) broadly follows the stellar rotation pattern. In contrast, the gas velocity dispersion ($\\sigma_{H\\alpha}$, Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC89_kin}d), exhibits widespread enhancements, particularly in the NE and SW regions, where values rise to $\\sim$80-100 km/s. These elevated dispersions are indicative of turbulent gas motions, possibly associated with shocks or AGN-driven outflows.\n\nThe mass-weighted stellar age distribution (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC89_sfh}a) reveals an old stellar population (10-12 Gyr) concentrated in the central region, while the disc is dominated by intermediate-age stellar populations($\\lesssim$4 Gyr). This suggests that the central mass concentration was assembled at early epochs, while the disc experienced more extended or episodic star formation. The stellar metallicity distribution ([M/H]; Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC89_sfh}b) exhibits a pronounced radial gradient. The central few arcseconds are comparatively metal-poor, while metallicity reaches nearly solar values in a ring-like structure located at $\\sim$8-10 arcsec from the centre, followed by a negative gradient at larger radii.\n\nThe gas-phase metallicity map (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC89_sfh}c) spans $\\sim$8.5-8.95 dex, with the highest values observed in the NE, south, and SW regions of the disc, possibly tracing localised enrichment or outflows of metal-rich gas. The SFH (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC89_sfh}d) indicates an extended period of star formation over several Gyr, with comparatively little evidence for very recent star formation (within the last 1 Gyr) relative to the other galaxies in our sample. The lack of significant contributions from young stellar populations ($<100$ Myr) further supports the interpretation of NGC~89 as a quenched or post-starburst galaxy.\n\nThe ionisation diagnostics provide the clearest evidence for nuclear activity in NGC~89. The BPT diagram (Fig.~\\ref{fig:BPT_WHAN_NGC89}, top left) classifies the emission-line spaxels using the [OIII]/H$\\beta$ and [NII]/H$\\alpha$ line ratios. The spaxels populate all four classical regimes: star-forming (blue), composite (yellow), LINER (lime), and Seyfert (red). The spatially resolved BPT map (Fig.~\\ref{fig:BPT_WHAN_NGC89}, top right) confirms the presence of a Seyfert~2 nucleus surrounded by a star-forming ring, together with extended Seyfert-like emission.\n\nThe WHAN diagram (Fig.~\\ref{fig:BPT_WHAN_NGC89}, bottom left) provides complementary constraints on the dominant ionisation sources by separating strong and weak AGN (sAGN and wAGN) from retired galaxies (RGs) and passive regions using both emission-line ratios and H$\\alpha$ equivalent width. NGC~89 spans a broad range in the WHAN plane, with a substantial fraction of spaxels occupying the sAGN and wAGN regions, while others lie in the RG regime. The spatially resolved WHAN map (Fig.~\\ref{fig:BPT_WHAN_NGC89}, bottom right) broadly mirrors the BPT classification, revealing a prominent sAGN nucleus surrounded by wAGN- and RG-like regions, along with a central star-forming ring. Extended sAGN emission toward the NE direction suggests the presence of a galaxy-scale outflow, consistent with the extraplanar emission reported by \\citet{Presotto10}. However, no associated X-ray emission from the extended narrow-line region has been detected \\citep{Trinchieri08}, despite the commonly observed correlation between H$\\alpha$ outflows and X-ray features \\citep{Bomans97, Strickland04, Zhang24}.\n\nIn addition to the Seyfert nucleus, NGC~89 hosts a young and metal-rich circumnuclear star-forming ring. The origin of both the nuclear ring and the outflow may be linked either to bar-driven gas inflow or to interaction-driven fuelling of the central black hole. Nuclear rings and discs are commonly observed in barred galaxies \\citep{Gadotti19, Gadotti20, Keshri25a}, although merger-driven origins have also been proposed for unbarred systems \\citep{Mayer08, Corsini12}. In merger-driven scenarios, nuclear discs are generally not expected to show strong radial gradients in stellar age and metallicity, unlike the well-defined gradients observed in barred galaxies \\citep{Bittner2020}. Although the disturbed morphology of NGC~89 makes it difficult to constrain the presence of a bar photometrically, the clear stellar population gradients across the nuclear disc favour a bar-driven origin. These results suggest that bar-driven gas inflow is the most likely mechanism responsible for fuelling the AGN, driving the galactic-scale outflow, and sustaining the circumnuclear star-forming ring.\n\n\\begin{figure}[h]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=9cm, height = 8cm]{fig/MUSE88_kinematics.jpeg}\n \\caption{Spatially resolved maps of stellar and gas kinematics of NGC 88 derived from MUSE observations. All the panels are same as in Figure\\ref{fig:NGC92_kin}.}\n \\label{fig:NGC88_kin}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{NGC 88}\nNGC~88 is a peculiar S0 galaxy within RQ, exhibiting ongoing star formation, tidal features, and kinematically disturbed structures. SED modelling with \\texttt{CIGALE} yields a stellar mass of $\\sim6.26\\times10^{9}M_{\\odot}$, placing it among the low- to intermediate-mass systems in the group. The total SFR derived from the SED fit is ($\\sim$0.4~$M_{\\odot}~{\\rm yr^{-1}}$), and in the sSFR–$M_{*}$ plane (Fig.~\\ref{fig:ssfr-mass}), NGC 88 lies within the star-forming sequence. The FUV-based SFR is $\\sim$0.44 $M_{\\odot}~{\\rm yr^{-1}}$, and the UV-derived age is $\\sim$128 Myr. \\citet{Pompei07} reported a common HI envelope between NGC~88 and NGC~92, suggesting that recent star formation may be triggered or sustained by ongoing gravitational interactions within the group.\n\nThe stellar velocity map (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC88_kin}a) reveals a rotating disc with velocities reaching $\\pm$50 km/s. The stellar velocity dispersion ($\\sigma_{*}$, Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC88_kin}b) is generally low ($\\sigma_{*} < 30$km/s), with localised enhancements up to $\\sim$50 km/s in the outer regions. In contrast, the H$\\alpha$ velocity field (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC88_kin}c) is more irregular, with the core and outer disc exhibiting distinct rotation patterns. The outer gas disc is misaligned with respect to the stellar rotation axis, indicating kinematic decoupling and supporting a recent gas accretion scenario, while the central gas kinematics are broadly consistent with the stellar component. Such kinematic misalignments are commonly observed in S0 galaxies undergoing morphological transformation and are often attributed to minor mergers or external gas accretion \\citep{McDermid07, Jin16, Bryant19, Zhou22, Ristea22, Zinchenko23}. Simulations show that misalignments between stellar and gas discs can persist for $\\sim$2 Gyr, with the central regions realigning more rapidly than the outskirts \\citep{van-de-Voort15}. The gas velocity dispersion ($\\sigma_{H\\alpha}$, Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC88_kin}d) is elevated in the outer regions and exhibits significant spatial variation, indicating turbulent gas dynamics, possibly driven by tidal heating.\n\nThe mass-weighted stellar age (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC88_sfh}a) is dominated by an intermediate-age population ($\\sim$1-3 Gyr). The stellar metallicity distribution ([M/H]; Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC88_sfh}b) spans $\\sim$ -1.5 to -0.3 dex across the disc, with the highest values in the NW region. In contrast, the SE disc is comparatively metal-poor, indicating younger, less-evolved stellar populations, possibly associated with the inflow of metal-poor gas from NGC 92. The gas-phase metallicity (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC88_sfh}c) ranges from $\\sim$8.4 to 8.8 dex, with slightly lower values in the central regions than in the outskirts, and is broadly consistent with that of NGC~92. The average SFH distribution (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC88_sfh}d) shows a prominent peak at $\\sim$1 Gyr, indicating that a significant fraction of the stellar mass was assembled during this epoch.\n\nThe combined kinematic and stellar population properties of NGC 88 indicate ongoing gas transfer between NGC 88 and NGC 92, as evidenced by the observed kinematic misalignment between the stellar and gaseous discs. The stellar and gas-phase metallicity distributions further support this scenario.\n\n\\begin{figure}[h]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=9cm, height = 9cm]{fig/MUSE88_SFH.jpeg}\n \\caption{Spatially resolved maps of stellar population properties of NGC 88 derived from MUSE observations. All the panels are same as in Figure\\ref{fig:NGC92_sfh}.}\n \\label{fig:NGC88_sfh}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{NGC 87}\nNGC 87 is morphologically classified as an irregular and peculiar system. SED modelling with CIGALE yields a stellar mass of $M_{*}\\sim 1.87\\times 10^{9} M_{\\odot}$ (Table~\\ref{tab:sed_out}), placing it in the dwarf-galaxy regime. Dwarf galaxies typically have lower stellar masses ($M_{*}\\le 10^{10} M_{\\odot}$) and smaller physical sizes than galaxies along the Hubble sequence \\citep{Lelli22}. \\textit{GALEX} UV imaging reveals an extended UV disc, with an FUV-derived star formation rate (SFR) of 1.14 $M_{\\odot} {\\rm yr^{-1}}$ and a corresponding UV age of $\\sim$32 Myr (Table~\\ref{tab:sfr_age}). The combination of low stellar mass and elevated SFR classifies NGC 87 as a star-forming dwarf galaxy (SFDG). Approximately 70\\% of dwarf galaxies are actively forming stars and are classified as SFDGs \\citep{Karachentsev04}. Their compact sizes, low rotational velocities ($V_{rot} \\le 100$ km/s), high gas fractions, and subsolar metallicities lead to star formation processes that differ from those in massive disc galaxies \\citep{Bergvall12}. Stellar feedback and environmental effects further regulate their star formation activity \\citep{Meurer95}. Although SFDGs are most commonly found in low-density environments with few massive neighbours \\citep{Weisz14a, Weisz14b}, the presence of NGC 87 within RQ shows that such systems can also sustain active star formation in dense environments.\n\nMUSE kinematic and stellar population maps of NGC 87 are shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC87_kin} and Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC87_sfh}, respectively. Its stellar velocity field (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC87_kin}a) exhibits a well-ordered rotation spanning $-50$ to $+50$ km/s, indicating the presence of a rotating disc despite the galaxy’s irregular morphology. The H$\\alpha$ velocity field (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC87_kin}c) closely follows the stellar kinematics, suggesting co-rotation of stars and gas. The velocity dispersion provides further insight into the dynamical state of the group. The stellar velocity dispersion ($\\sigma_{*}$, Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC87_kin}b), remains low ($\\sim$10-20 km/s) across most of the disc, consistent with a dynamically cold stellar component typical of dwarf galaxies \\citep{Walker07}. In contrast, the gas velocity dispersion ($\\sigma_{H\\alpha}$, Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC87_kin}d), reaches values up to $\\sim$70 km/s in the outer regions, indicating enhanced turbulence in the ionised gas component.\n\nThe mass-weighted stellar age map (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC87_sfh}a) shows younger stellar populations ($\\sim$0.5 Gyr) dominating the outer disc, while relatively older populations ($\\sim$2--3 Gyr) are concentrated toward the centre. The stellar metallicity, [M/H] (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC87_sfh}b), is subsolar across the galaxy, ranging from $-0.5$ to $-1.0$ dex, consistent with the low chemical enrichment expected in low-mass systems. The gas-phase metallicity (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC87_sfh}c) is relatively uniform across the disc, with $12+\\log({\\rm O/H}) \\sim$ 8.3-8.5. Low-mass galaxies with elevated star formation rates are known to exhibit lower metallicities \\citep{Ellison08, Mannucci10, Yates12}, likely due to the removal of enriched material through stellar winds and supernova-driven outflows \\citep{Mac99}. The reconstructed average SFH (Fig.~\\ref{fig:NGC87_sfh}d) shows enhanced activity in recent epochs (100 Myr-1 Gyr), indicative of a bursty SFH.\n\nNGC 87, despite its irregular morphology, exhibits ordered rotation. The low stellar and gas velocity dispersions ($\\sigma_{*}$ and $\\sigma_{H\\alpha}$), together with a recent SFH and extended UV emission relative to the optical light, indicate the presence of young, massive stellar populations distributed across the galaxy. The subsolar stellar metallicity and relatively flat gas-phase metallicity gradient further suggest efficient mixing of metals throughout the disc. These results show that low-mass galaxies can sustain significant star formation even within a compact, interaction-dominated environment.\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=9cm, height = 8cm]{fig/MUSE87_kinematics.jpeg}\n \\caption{Spatially resolved maps of stellar and gas kinematics of NGC 87 derived from MUSE observations. All the panels are the same as in Figure\\ref{fig:NGC92_kin}.}\n \\label{fig:NGC87_kin}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\section{Discussions}\\label{sec:Disc}\n\nThe compact group Roberts Quartet (RQ) consists of four morphologically distinct galaxies in close proximity, spanning a stellar mass range of $9.2 < \\log_{10}(M_{*}/M_{\\odot}) < 10.8$. Despite sharing a common environment, the group exhibits a striking diversity in evolutionary states: three members are actively forming stars, while one galaxy is relatively quenched and appears to be transitioning toward a passive phase, likely driven by AGN activity and gas depletion within the group environment. Such coexistence of star-forming and quenched systems is a characteristic feature of compact groups, reflecting asynchronous galaxy evolution driven by repeated gravitational interactions, and RQ does represent a laboratory for studying CG evolution.\n\nThe interaction history of the RQ further supports this picture. Previous estimates suggest a recent encounter between NGC 92 and NGC 89 on timescales of $\\sim$200–700 Myr \\citep{Presotto10}, while our UV-based age estimates and non-parametric star formation histories indicate a similarly recent interaction epoch ($\\lesssim$500 Myr) across all group members. This implies that the system is currently in an active phase of dynamical evolution, in which tidal interactions and gas exchange simultaneously trigger star formation and fuel nuclear activity. In this context, RQ can be regarded as a southern analogue of HCG~16, a well-studied compact group exhibiting strong kinematic disturbances and enhanced star formation. The presence of disturbed morphologies, asymmetric velocity fields, and widespread star formation in RQ reinforces the interpretation that tidal forces and repeated close encounters are efficiently redistributing angular momentum and funnelling gas toward galaxy centres, thereby sustaining both starburst and AGN phases. More broadly, this suggests that RQ represents a dynamically young compact group in which interaction-driven transformation is currently ongoing.\n\nTo further assess the dynamical state of RQ, we estimated the group crossing time and velocity dispersion (Sect.~\\ref{sec:dynamics}). We derive a crossing time of $\\sim$424 Myr ($log(H_{0}t_{c}) \\sim -1.52$) and velocity dispersion of $\\sim$74 km/s, placing the system in the early (stage 1) phase of compact group evolution as defined by \\citet{Montaguth25}. Our estimate of crossing time differs from previous estimates \\citep[e.g.,][]{Pompei07}, who treated RQ as a quintet by including an additional member. Their larger group membership led to a higher estimate of velocity dispersion. Our analysis considers only the four spectroscopically confirmed members of RQ, consistent with the current group definition. The presence of only one passive galaxy in the group further supports this early-stage classification, where most members are still actively forming stars.\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=9cm, height = 8cm]{fig/MUSE87_SFH.jpeg}\n \\caption{Spatially resolved maps of stellar population properties of NGC 87 derived from MUSE observations. All the panels are the same as in Figure\\ref{fig:NGC92_sfh}.}\n \\label{fig:NGC87_sfh}\n\\end{figure}\n\nThe combination of short crossing time and low velocity dispersion indicates that RQ is a dynamically young system that has not yet reached virial equilibrium. Such conditions imply that the member galaxies are undergoing repeated close encounters on relatively short timescales, consistent with the interaction epoch inferred from UV ages and star formation histories ($\\lesssim$500 Myr). The close agreement between the crossing time and the recent interaction timescale suggests that the current phase of enhanced star formation and AGN activity is directly linked to ongoing group assembly. Moreover, the observed kinematic disturbances and localised star-forming regions are characteristic of systems in which gravitational interactions are still actively redistributing mass and angular momentum. Taken together, these results support a scenario in which RQ is in the early stages of hierarchical assembly, where dynamical evolution, gas inflow, and star formation are tightly coupled.\n\nThe metallicity distribution of the group members provides additional insight into the assembly history of RQ. The predominantly sub-solar metallicities and relatively weak radial gradients are consistent with a scenario in which the system has been assembled through successive interactions and mergers involving low-mass, metal-poor progenitors. Such properties are commonly observed in dynamically young compact groups, where repeated encounters and gas mixing act to homogenise the chemical composition. In this context, RQ can be regarded as a nearby example of compact group formation driven by hierarchical assembly.\n\nAn important implication of our analysis emerges from the dynamical and structural complexity of NGC 92. The presence of kinematically distinct components, together with prominent tidal features and enhanced star formation, suggests that this system may be the remnant of a recent merger event rather than a single undisturbed spiral galaxy. If confirmed, this interpretation implies that the RQ may not represent a strictly four-member system, but rather the outcome of interactions involving additional progenitor galaxies, effectively making it a dynamically evolving group. This highlights the transient nature of compact groups, where ongoing mergers and accretion can modify both the internal structure of galaxies and the apparent group membership.\n\nA similar picture is emerging from recent high-redshift observations with the \\textit{James Webb Space Telescope} (JWST). Compact group-like systems identified at $z \\sim 5$ \\citep{Jin23} and $z \\sim 7$ \\citep{Wei26} exhibit dynamically young, non-virialised structures characterised by strong interactions, elevated star formation rates, and extreme ionisation conditions. These systems show clear signatures of rapid gas accretion, mergers, and efficient feedback operating on short dynamical timescales. The close resemblance between these properties and those observed in RQ suggests that the latter may represent a low-redshift analogue of such pre-virialised systems. In addition, recent JWST observations of Stephan’s Quintet have revealed the complex interplay between galaxy interactions, shocks, and the multiphase interstellar medium in compact environments, further reinforcing the connection between local and distant systems. As such, RQ provides a valuable nearby laboratory in which the physical processes governing galaxy assembly, gas accretion, and feedback have been studied in spatial detail, thereby offering a practical framework for interpreting JWST observations of galaxy evolution in the early Universe.\n\n\\section{Conclusions}\\label{sec:Conc}\nWe have presented a multiwavelength analysis of the compact galaxy group Roberts Quartet (SCG0018-4854) using UV, optical, near-IR imaging, and spatially resolved MUSE IFU data. Our results indicate that the system is dynamically young and currently undergoing active interaction-driven evolution. The relatively low crossing time ($\\sim$424 Myr), low velocity dispersion, and consistent interaction timescales ($\\lesssim$500 Myr) derived from UV ages and star formation histories suggest that the group is in an early stage of assembly.\n\nThe member galaxies exhibit a diverse range of evolutionary states, including ongoing star formation, recent gas accretion, and AGN-driven quenching, highlighting the coexistence of multiple transformation pathways within a single galaxy group. The disturbed kinematics, enhanced star formation, and relatively uniform metallicity distributions further support a scenario in which repeated interactions and gas exchange are actively redistributing mass and angular momentum across the system.\n\nA key result of this study is the dynamical and structural complexity of NGC~92, which shows evidence for a recent merger event. This suggests that RQ may not represent a strictly four-member system, but rather a dynamically evolving configuration involving additional progenitor galaxies. This highlights the transient nature of compact groups and the importance of hierarchical assembly in shaping their observed properties.\n\nFinally, the physical conditions observed in RQ, characterised by strong interactions, enhanced star formation, and short dynamical timescales, closely resemble those seen in high-redshift galaxies. In this context, the system provides a valuable nearby analogue for compact, rapidly assembling structures now being probed with the \\textit{JWST}. Our results demonstrate that detailed studies of local compact groups can offer important insights into the processes governing galaxy assembly, gas accretion, and feedback in the early Universe. Also, observations with ALMA could trace the molecular gas reservoirs and resolve the interplay between dense gas, star formation, and feedback processes, particularly in the ring-like structure of NGC 92. Complementary hydrodynamical simulations constrained by the specific mass distribution, orbital configuration, and gas content of RQ would allow a quantitative reconstruction of its interaction history and future evolution. Such models would be essential for testing the proposed origins of the ring structure, AGN fuelling, and gas mixing and for predicting the eventual fate of the group.\n\n\\begin{acknowledgement}\nWe are grateful to the anonymous referee for the thorough review and constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript. MD and SB gratefully acknowledge the support of the Department of Science and Technology (DST) grant DST/WIDUSHI-A/PM/2023/25(G) for this research, and the support of the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB) Core Research Grant CRG/2022/004531 for this study. SK thanks Dr Ramya Sethuram for long discussions. This paper has used the observations collected at the European Southern Observatory under ESO program 0101.C-0329. This research has also used UV data from GALEX, optical images from the Dark Energy Camera (DECam), which was constructed by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) collaboration. This work is based on observations made with VIRCAM/VISTA and WISE. This research has made use of NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology (Caltech) under contract with NASA. \n\\end{acknowledgement}\n\\bibliographystyle{aa}\n\\bibliography{Reference}\n\n\\begin{appendix}\n\n\\section{Detection of SFCs and SFR estimation}\nStar-forming (SF) regions appear as bright clumps in the background-subtracted \\textit{GALEX} FUV and NUV images. To systematically detect these regions across all galaxies of RQ, we used the \\texttt{SExtractor} software \\citep{Bertin96}. Source detection was performed on the \\textit{GALEX} NUV images with the following configuration: \\texttt{DETECT\\_THRESH}=5$\\sigma$ (where $\\sigma$ is the global background noise), \\texttt{DETECT\\_MINAREA}=10 pixels, \\texttt{DEBLEND\\_NTHRESH}=16, and \\texttt{DEBLEND\\_MINCONT}=0.0005. For NGC 87, NGC 88, and NGC 89, one prominent SF region was detected in each galaxy, which covers the light from the entire galaxy, whereas we were able to detect six regions in NGC 92, consistent with the spatial resolution of the \\textit{GALEX} data. Aperture photometry of the detected regions was performed using the \\texttt{Photutils} package\\footnote{\\url{https://photutils.readthedocs.io/en/stable/aperture.html}}, yielding FUV and NUV fluxes for each source.\n\nThese UV-bright regions trace populations of young, massive stars, whose observed magnitudes are affected by both Galactic and internal extinction. Galactic extinction in the FUV and NUV bands was corrected using the extinction law of \\citet{Cardelli89}, expressed as\n\\begin{equation}\n <\\frac{A(\\lambda)}{A(V)}> = a(x)+\\frac{b(x)}{R_{v}}\n \\label{eq:1}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $x$ is the wavenumber and the functions $a(x)$ and $b(x)$ are defined in \\citet{Cardelli89}. We adopted $R_V = 3.1$ for the Milky Way and used $A(V) = 0.054$ for NGC 87 and $A(V) = 0.053$ for NGC 88, NGC 89, and NGC 92.\n\nIn addition to Galactic extinction, it is crucial to correct for internal extinction, which arises from dust within the star-forming regions themselves. It was corrected using the UV spectral slope ($\\beta$), defined by $f_{\\lambda} \\propto \\lambda^{\\beta}$, which quantifies dust attenuation in the UV continuum after Galactic correction and is applicable over the wavelength range 1250–2600$\\AA$ \\citep{Calzetti94}. For the \\textit{GALEX} filters, $\\beta$ was computed as\n\\begin{equation}\n \\beta = -0.4 \\frac{m_{FUV} - m_{NUV}}{log(\\lambda_{FUV}/\\lambda_{NUV})} - 2.0\n \\label{eq:2}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $m_{\\mathrm{FUV}}$ and $m_{\\mathrm{NUV}}$ are the Milky Way extinction-corrected magnitudes, and $\\lambda_{\\mathrm{FUV}}$ and $\\lambda_{\\mathrm{NUV}}$ are the central wavelengths of the respective filters. The colour excess was then derived following \\citet{Calzetti00}:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\beta = -2.616 + 4.684E(B-V)\n \\label{eq:3}\n\\end{equation}\nFrom E(B-V), the internal extinction at a given wavelength was calculated using the \\citep{Calzetti00} relation: \n\n\\begin{equation}\n A_{\\lambda} = k^{'}(\\lambda)E_{s}(B-V)\n \\label{eq:4}\n\\end{equation}\nWhere $E_{s}(B-V)$ is the colour excess applicable to the stellar continuum, and $k^{'}(\\lambda)$ is the attenuation curve defined as:\n\\begin{equation}\n k^{'}(\\lambda) = -2.659(-2.15 + \\frac{1.509}{\\lambda} - \\frac{0.198}{\\lambda^{2}} + \\frac{0.011}{\\lambda^{3}}) + R^{'}_{V}\n \\label{eq:5}\n\\end{equation}\nHere, $R^{'}_{V}$ = 4.05 $\\pm$ 0.80 and $\\lambda$ $\\in$ [1200\\AA, 6300\\AA] \\citep{Calzetti00}. \n\nThe stellar colour excess is related to the total colour excess by:\n\\begin{equation}\n E_{s}(B-V) = (0.44\\pm0.03)E(B-V)\n \\label{eq:6}\n\\end{equation}\nUsing the estimated extinction, we calculate the extinction-corrected luminosity as:\n\\begin{equation}\n L_{corr} = L_{obs} \\times 10^{0.4 E_{\\lambda}(B-V)K^{'}(\\lambda)}\n \\label{eq:7}\n\\end{equation}\nHere $L_{obs}$ denotes the luminosity measured before correcting for dust extinction.\n\nTo investigate star formation activity in galaxies, it is essential to examine SF regions across multiple wavelengths, as different populations of stars emit at different wavelengths. Ultraviolet (UV) emission serves as an effective tracer of recent star formation (up to $\\sim$300 Myr), as it predominantly originates from young high mass O, B-type stars \\citep{Davies16}.\n\nWe estimated the star formation rates (SFRs) using the GALEX FUV band, following the calibrations provided by \\citet{Kennicutt09}. The extinction-corrected luminosities were used to derive the SFRs according to the following relation:\n\\begin{equation}\n SFR_{FUV}(M_\\odot\\ yr^{-1}) = 4.6\\times10^{-44}L_{corr}(FUV).\n\t\\label{eq:8}\n\\end{equation}\nHere, $L_{corr}$ denotes the extinction-corrected luminosity in units of erg s$^{-1}$. The derived SFRs for each galaxy are presented in Table~\\ref{tab:sfr_age}. \\\\\n\n\\section{Age of the SF regions}\n\\begin{table}\n\t\\centering\n \\caption{Starburst99 model parameters used in this work.}\n\t\\begin{tabular}{lccccr} % four columns, alignment for each\n\t\t\\hline\n\t\t Parameter & Value\\\\\n \\hline\n\t\tStar Formation & Instantaneous \\\\\n\t\tCluster mass range & $10^{7} M_{\\odot}- 10^{9} M_{\\odot}$\\\\\n Stellar IMF & Kroupa (1.3,2.3)\\\\\n Mass Boundaries for IMF & $0.1M_{\\odot}$, $0.5M_{\\odot}$, $100M_{\\odot}$ \\\\\n\t\tStellar evolution track & Geneva (high mass loss)\\\\\n \t\tMetallicity & Solar (Z =0.02)\\\\\n Age range & 1-900 Myr\\\\\n Supernova cut-off mass & 8 $M_{\\odot}$ \\\\\n Black hole cut-off mass & 120 $M_{\\odot}$ \\\\\n \\hline\n\t\\end{tabular}\n\t\\label{tab:starburst}\n\\end{table}\n\nTo estimate the ages of the star-forming regions, we employed the \\texttt{Starburst99} stellar population synthesis code \\citep{Leitherer99}, widely used for modelling actively star-forming galaxies. \\texttt{Starburst99} provides spectrophotometric predictions for simple stellar populations (SSPs) based on evolutionary tracks and various stellar atmosphere models. Synthetic stellar spectra were generated using the input parameters listed in Table~\\ref{tab:starburst}. The model spectra were convolved with the effective area curves of the \\textit{GALEX} FUV and NUV filters to compute the model-predicted fluxes in each band, using\n\n \\begin{equation}\n F_{\\mathrm{cal}}(\\lambda) = \\frac{\\int F(\\lambda) , EA(\\lambda) , d\\lambda}{\\int EA(\\lambda) , d\\lambda},\n \\label{eq:10}\n \\end{equation}\n \nWhere $F_{\\mathrm{cal}}(\\lambda)$ is the calibrated flux, $F(\\lambda)$ is the model flux and $EA(\\lambda)$ denote the effective area of the corresponding \\textit{GALEX} filter. All fluxes are expressed in units of erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \\AA$^{-1}$. The resulting fluxes were converted to AB magnitudes to compute theoretical FUV–NUV colors. By comparing these with the extinction-corrected observed FUV–NUV colors, we estimated the ages of the star-forming clumps in each galaxy. The derived ages are summarised in Table~\\ref{tab:sfr_age}. Fig.~\\ref{fig:age_NGC92} presents the age distribution of star-forming regions in NGC 92, based on their UV colours (left panel) and their corresponding spatial distribution within the galaxy (right panel).\n\n\\begin{table}\n\t\\centering\n \\caption{SFR and Age of the regions identified in each galaxy.}\n\t\\begin{tabular}{lccccr}\n\t\t\\hline\n\t\t Name & $SFR_{FUV}$ & Age\\\\\n & $(M_\\odot\\ yr^{-1})$ & (Myr)\\\\\n \\hline\n \\\\\n\t\tNGC 87 & 1.142 $\\pm$ 0.037 & 31.97 \\\\\n NGC 88 & 0.444 $\\pm$ 0.007 & 127.57 \\\\\n\t\tNGC 89 & 0.586 $\\pm$ 0.017 & 275.54 \\\\\n NGC 92 & 0.018 $\\pm$ 0.002 & 61.90 (1)\\\\\n & 0.942 $\\pm$ 0.029 & 204.13 (2)\\\\\n & 0.015 $\\pm$ 0.002 & 46.10 (3)\\\\\n & 0.044 $\\pm$ 0.006 & 44.70 (4)\\\\\n & 0.022 $\\pm$ 0.003 & 40.63 (5)\\\\\n & 0.072 $\\pm$ 0.008 & 27.18 (6)\\\\ \n \\hline\n\t\\end{tabular}\n \\begin{flushleft}\n \\footnotesize\n \\textbf{Description:} {For NGC 87, NGC 88, and NGC 89, one prominent SF region was detected, which covers the light from the entire galaxy, whereas we were able to detect six regions in NGC 92.}\n \\end{flushleft}\n\t\\label{tab:sfr_age}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{figure*}\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{fig/age_92.pdf}\n\\caption{\\textbf{Left:} Extinction-corrected observed (FUV-NUV) colors of star-forming regions in NGC 92 (red circles) plotted as a function of age. The black dashed line represents the theoretical color–age relation obtained from a Starburst99 model. \\textbf{Right:} Spatial distribution of star-forming regions in NGC 92, color-coded by their derived ages.}\n\\label{fig:age_NGC92}\n\\end{figure*} \n\n\\section{BPT classification of galaxies}\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{fig/BPT.pdf}\n \\caption{BPT classification of NGC 92 (top), NGC 88 (middle) and NGC 87(bottom).}\n \\label{fig:BPT}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\section{Input and output parameters of CIGALE modelling}\n\n\\begin{figure*}\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=0.92\\textwidth]{fig/SED.pdf}\n\\caption{CIGALE SED fits for the RQ quartet: NGC 87 (top-left), NGC 88 (top-right), NGC 89 (bottom-left), and NGC 92 (bottom-right). The best-fitting models are overlaid on observed photometric data in each panel.}\n\\label{fig:sed}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{table*}\n \\centering\n \\caption{Input Parameters for SED Fitting with CIGALE.}\n \\begin{tabularx}{\\textwidth}{lX}\n \\hline\n \\textbf{Parameter} & \\textbf{Value} \\\\\n \\hline\n \\textbf{Star formation history (sfhdelayedbq)} & \\\\\n e-folding time of the main stellar population & 200.0, 500.0, 700.0, 1000.0, 2000.0, 3000.0, 4000.0, 5000.0 \\\\\n Age of the main stellar population & 1000, 2000, 3500, 5000, 6500, 8000, 10500 \\\\\n Age of the late burst/quench episode & 100.0, 200.0, 300.0, 400.0, 500.0 \\\\\n Ratio of the SFR after/before burst/quench & 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.7, 1.0, 5.0, 10.0, 100.0 \\\\\n Instance without any burst & 1.0 \\\\\n \\hline\n \\textbf{Stellar population synthesis (bc03)} \\\\\n \\\\\n IMF & Salpeter \\\\\n Metallicity & 0.004, 0.008, 0.02, 0.05 \\\\\n Separation between the young and the old stellar populations & 10 Myr \\\\\n \\hline \n \\textbf{Nebular emission (nebular)} \\\\\n \\\\\n Ionization parameter & -2.0 \\\\\n Gas metallicity & 0.004, 0.008, 0.012, 0.02, 0.033 \\\\\n Electron density & 100 $cm^{-3}$ \\\\\n \\hline\n \\textbf{Dust attenuation (dustatt \\_ modified \\_ starburst)} \\\\\n \\\\\n Colour excess of the nebular lines light for both the young and old population & 0.3 \\\\\n Reduction factor to apply on E\\_BV\\_lines to compute E(B-V)s & 0.44 \\\\\n Central wavelength of the UV bump in nm & 217.5 \\\\\n Width (FWHM) of the UV bump in nm & 35.0 \\\\\n UV bump amplitude & 0.0 \\\\\n Slope delta of the power law & 0.0 \\\\\n Filters for which the attenuation will be computed and added & FUV and NUV \\\\\n \\hline \n \\textbf{Dust emission (dl2014)} \\\\\n \\\\\n Mass fraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) & 0.5, 1.12, 2.5, 3.19, 5.26 \\\\\n Minimum radiation field & 0.5, 1.0, 5, 10, 15, 25 \\\\\n Power-law slope & 1.5, 2.0 \\\\\n Fraction illuminated from Umin to Umax & 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 0.5 \\\\\n \\hline \n \\textbf{AGN module (skirtor2016)} \\textbf{(NGC 89)}\\\\\n \\\\ \n Average edge-on optical depth at 9.7 $\\mu m$ & 3, 7 \\\\\n Power-law exponent that sets the radial gradient with the polar angle & 1.0 \\\\\n Index that sets the dust density gradient with the polar angle & 1.0 \\\\\n Inclination, i.e., viewing angle, position of the instrument w.r.t. the AGN axis & 30, 70 \\\\\n Disk spectrum & Schartmann spectrum \\\\\n AGN fraction & 0.0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.8 \\\\\n Wavelength range in microns used to compute the AGN fraction & 0/0 \\\\\n Extinction law of the polar dust & SMC \\\\\n E(B-V ) for the extinction in the polar direction in magnitudes & 0.0, 0.03, 0.2, 0.4 \\\\\n Temperature of the polar dust & 100.0 K \\\\\n Emissivity index of the polar dust & 1.6 \\\\ \n \\hline\n \\end{tabularx}\n \\label{tab:sed}\n \\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{fig/sSFR_vs_Mass.jpeg}\n \\caption{The star-forming main sequence of galaxies. Here, the red symbols represent the galaxies of RQ. The contour shows the density map of the data points from the GSLWC-X2 catalogue \\citep{Salim16, Salim18}}.\n \\label{fig:ssfr-mass}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\end{appendix}\n\\end{document}\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091161,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31961"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31961"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Haonan Zhang"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Paata Ivanisvili, Xinyuan Xie, Haonan Zhang"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"A Beckmann boundary form of Talagrand's conjecture on the discrete cube"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"35 pages, 1 figure"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"math.CA math.FA math.PR"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"We introduce the Beckmann boundary of a Boolean function \\[\n \\mathsf{B}(f)=\\inf_{\\operatorname{div} V=Lf}\\mathbb E\\|V(x)\\|_2. \\] Here \\[\n L=\\sum_iD_i,\\qquad D_i f(x)=\\frac{f(x)-f(x^{\\oplus i})}{2}, \\] and $\\operatorname{div} V(x)=\\sum_i (V_{i}(x)-V_{i}(x^{\\oplus i}))$. This nonlocal quantity is no larger than the usual two-sided, one-sided, colored, optimized colored, or optimized fractional colored boundaries. Nevertheless, every nonconstant Boolean $f$ satisfies \\[\n \\mathsf{B}(f)\\gtrsim \\operatorname{Var}(f)\n \\sqrt{\\log\\!\\left(1+\\frac{1}{\\sum_i\\operatorname{Inf}_i(f)^2}\\right)}. \\] We also prove strong one-sided fractional spectral estimates. If $A\\subset\\{-1,1\\}^n$ and \\[\n h_{A}(x)=\\#\\{i:x\\in A,\\ x^{\\oplus i}\\notin A\\}, \\] then, for $0<\\alpha<1$, \\[\n \\sum_{S\\ne\\varnothing}|S|^\\alpha\\widehat{\\mathbf 1_{A}}(S)^2\n \\lesssim_\\alpha \\mathbb E\\omega_\\alpha(h_{A}), \\] where $\\omega_\\alpha(m)=\\sqrt m$ for $\\alpha<1/2$, $\\omega_{1/2}(m)=\\sqrt m\\log(e+m)$, and $\\omega_\\alpha(m)=m^\\alpha$ for $\\alpha>1/2$. These profiles are sharp, up to $\\alpha$-dependent constants, for majority. We also show that the comparison is genuinely nonreversible: an explicit quotient-cube family makes the optimized fractional, and hence optimized colored, boundary exceed $\\mathsf{B}$ by a factor $\\gtrsim\\sqrt{\\log n}$. We further obtain a driftless Bernstein-multiplier inequality."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:02:21 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:02:21 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Ivanisvili","Paata",""],["Xie","Xinyuan",""],["Zhang","Haonan",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Ivanisvili\",\n \"Paata\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Xie\",\n \"Xinyuan\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Zhang\",\n \"Haonan\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: beckmann_arxiv_v1.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[11pt]{amsart}\n\n\\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}\n\\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm,mathtools}\n\\usepackage{enumitem}\n\\usepackage{microtype}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage[colorlinks=true,linkcolor=blue,citecolor=blue,urlcolor=blue]{hyperref}\n\n\\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]\n\\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}\n\\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}\n\\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}\n\\newtheorem{question}[theorem]{Question}\n\\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}\n\\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}\n\n\\newcommand{\\E}{\\mathbb E}\n\\newcommand{\\R}{\\mathbb R}\n\\newcommand{\\Var}{\\operatorname{Var}}\n\\newcommand{\\Inf}{\\operatorname{Inf}}\n\\newcommand{\\1}{\\mathbf 1}\n\\newcommand{\\Om}{\\Omega_n}\n\\newcommand{\\ip}[2]{\\langle #1,#2\\rangle}\n\\newcommand{\\Tcol}{\\mathsf T_{\\rm col}}\n\\newcommand{\\Ccol}{\\mathsf T_{\\rm col}}\n\\newcommand{\\Tfrac}{\\mathsf T_{\\rm frac}}\n\\newcommand{\\Ttheta}{\\mathsf T_{\\theta}}\n\\newcommand{\\B}{\\mathsf B}\n\\newcommand{\\divg}{\\operatorname{div}}\n\\DeclareMathOperator{\\dist}{dist}\n\\newcommand{\\dd}{\\textnormal{d}}\n\\newcommand{\\A}{A}\n\\newcommand{\\V}{V}\n\\newcommand{\\Stab}{\\operatorname{Stab}}\n\n\\title[A Beckmann boundary form of Talagrand's conjecture]{A Beckmann boundary form of Talagrand's conjecture on the discrete cube}\n\n\\author[P. Ivanisvili]{Paata Ivanisvili}\n\\address{Department of Mathematics, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA}\n\\email{pivanisv@uci.edu}\n\n\\author[X. Xie]{Xinyuan Xie}\n\\address{Department of Mathematics, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA}\n\\email{xinyuax7@uci.edu}\n\n\\author[H. Zhang]{Haonan Zhang}\n\\address{Department of Mathematics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA}\n\\email{haonanzhangmath@gmail.com}\n\n\\date{\\today}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\\begin{abstract}\nWe introduce the Beckmann boundary of a Boolean function\n\\[\n \\mathsf{B}(f)=\\inf_{\\operatorname{div} V=Lf}\\mathbb E\\|V(x)\\|_2.\n\\]\nHere\n\\[\n L=\\sum_iD_i,\\qquad D_i f(x)=\\frac{f(x)-f(x^{\\oplus i})}{2},\n\\]\nand $\\operatorname{div} V(x)=\\sum_i (V_{i}(x)-V_{i}(x^{\\oplus i}))$.\nThis nonlocal quantity is no larger than the usual two-sided, one-sided,\ncolored, optimized colored, or optimized fractional colored boundaries.\nNevertheless, every nonconstant Boolean $f$ satisfies\n\\[\n \\mathsf{B}(f)\\gtrsim \\operatorname{Var}(f)\n \\sqrt{\\log\\!\\left(1+\\frac{1}{\\sum_i\\operatorname{Inf}_i(f)^2}\\right)}.\n\\]\nWe also prove strong one-sided fractional spectral estimates. If\n$A\\subset\\{-1,1\\}^n$ and\n\\[\n h_{A}(x)=\\#\\{i:x\\in A,\\ x^{\\oplus i}\\notin A\\},\n\\]\nthen, for $0<\\alpha<1$,\n\\[\n \\sum_{S\\ne\\varnothing}|S|^\\alpha\\widehat{\\mathbf 1_{A}}(S)^2\n \\lesssim_\\alpha \\mathbb E\\omega_\\alpha(h_{A}),\n\\]\nwhere $\\omega_\\alpha(m)=\\sqrt m$ for $\\alpha<1/2$,\n$\\omega_{1/2}(m)=\\sqrt m\\log(e+m)$, and\n$\\omega_\\alpha(m)=m^\\alpha$ for $\\alpha>1/2$.\nThese profiles are sharp, up to $\\alpha$-dependent constants, for majority.\nWe also show that the comparison is genuinely nonreversible: an explicit\nquotient-cube family makes the optimized fractional, and hence optimized\ncolored, boundary exceed $\\mathsf{B}$ by a factor $\\gtrsim\\sqrt{\\log n}$. We\nfurther obtain a driftless Bernstein-multiplier inequality.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\\section{Introduction}\n\nLet $\\Omega_n=\\{-1,1\\}^n$ with the uniform probability measure. For a Boolean function\n$f:\\Omega_n\\to\\{-1,1\\}$, put $\\A:=\\{x:f(x)=1\\}$. Its one-sided boundary degree is\n\\[\n h_{\\A}(x):=\\#\\{i:x\\in\\A,\\ x^{\\oplus i}\\notin\\A\\},\n\\]\nwhere $x^{\\oplus i}$ denotes the point obtained by flipping the $i$th coordinate of $x$. The full, two-sided sensitivity is\n\\[\n s_f(x)=\\#\\{i\\in[n]:f(x)\\ne f(x^{\\oplus i})\\},\n \\qquad [n]:=\\{1,\\dots,n\\}.\n\\]\nTalagrand's classical theorem, in its original one-sided form, gives \\cite{Talagrand1993}\n\\[\n \\E\\sqrt{h_{\\A}(x)}\n \\gtrsim \\Var(f)\\sqrt{\\log(e/\\Var(f))}.\n\\]\nTalagrand later asked for a strengthening that also captures the KKL theorem, again formulated using the one-sided boundary \\cite{KKL,Talagrand1997}. In the uniform setting and normalization considered here, the conjectured estimate is\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Talagrand-intro}\n \\E\\sqrt{h_{\\A}(x)}\n \\ge c\\,\\Var(f)\n \\sqrt{\\log\\!\\left(1+\\frac{1}{\\sum_{i=1}^n\\Inf_i(f)^2}\\right)} .\n\\end{equation}\nHere $\\Inf_i(f)=\\Pr[f(x)\\ne f(x^{\\oplus i})]$ is the influence of the $i$th variable for $f$. \n\nEldan and Gross proved the related two-sided inequality \\cite[Theorem~1.4]{EldanGross}\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:EG-intro}\n \\E\\sqrt{s_f(x)}\n \\ge c\\,\\Var(f)\n \\sqrt{\\log\\!\\left(1+\\frac{1}{\\sum_{i=1}^n\\Inf_i(f)^2}\\right)} .\n\\end{equation}\nIndeed,\n\\[\n s_f=h_{\\A}+h_{\\A^c},\n \\qquad\n \\sqrt{s_f}=\\sqrt{h_{\\A}}+\\sqrt{h_{\\A^c}},\n\\]\nbecause $h_{\\A}$ and $h_{\\A^c}$ have disjoint supports. Consequently, Talagrand's one-sided conjecture implies \\eqref{eq:EG-intro}, but the converse does not follow. The two quantities can differ by an unbounded factor: if\n$f=2\\1_{\\{(1,\\ldots,1)\\}}-1$, then\n\\[\n \\E\\sqrt{h_{\\A}}=\\frac{\\sqrt n}{2^n},\n \\qquad\n \\E\\sqrt{s_f}=\\frac{n+\\sqrt n}{2^n}\\geq \\sqrt{n}\\; \\E\\sqrt{h_{\\A}}.\n\\]\nThis distinction is also emphasized in \\cite{IvanisviliZhang}. The stochastic argument in \\cite{EldanGross} controls the full squared gradient, or equivalently the two-sided sensitivity, through quadratic variation. In particular, the one-sided estimate \\eqref{eq:Talagrand-intro} does not follow from their published argument as written. Several alternative proofs of the two-sided inequality \\eqref{eq:EG-intro} are now known; see van Handel's argument as recorded in \\cite{RosenthalVanHandel}, \\cite[Remark~2]{BIM}, and \\cite{IvanisviliZhang}. The last reference also treats biased discrete cubes and Markov spaces with positive Bakry--\\'Emery curvature.\n\nTalagrand's one-sided conjecture follows from the robust colored theorem of Eldan--Kindler--Lifshitz--Minzer \\cite[Theorems~1.2 and~1.3, and Section~3.4]{EKLM}. Color every sensitive edge red or blue and write $\\chi$ for the coloring. Define $s_{f,{\\rm red}}(x)$ as the number of red sensitive edges adjacent to $x$ when $f(x)=1$, and set $s_{f,{\\rm red}}(x)=0$ when $f(x)=-1$. Similarly, define $s_{f,{\\rm blue}}(x)$ as the number of blue sensitive edges adjacent to $x$ when $f(x)=-1$, and set $s_{f,{\\rm blue}}(x)=0$ when $f(x)=1$. The associated colored boundary is\n\\[\n \\Tcol^\\chi(f)=\n \\E\\sqrt{s_{f,{\\rm red}}(x)}+\n \\E\\sqrt{s_{f,{\\rm blue}}(x)}.\n\\]\nThe all-red coloring gives $\\Tcol^\\chi(f)=\\E\\sqrt{h_{\\A}}$, while the all-blue coloring gives $\\Tcol^\\chi(f)=\\E\\sqrt{h_{\\A^c}}$. We write\n\\[\n \\Ccol(f)=\\inf_\\chi \\Tcol^\\chi(f)\n\\]\nfor the optimized colored boundary. Eldan--Kindler--Lifshitz--Minzer proved the Talagrand lower bound for $\\Tcol^\\chi(f)$ for every coloring $\\chi$, and hence also for $\\Ccol(f)$. Taking the all-red coloring yields \\eqref{eq:Talagrand-intro}; thus their colored theorem directly settles Talagrand's original one-sided formulation and, in particular, implies the two-sided inequality \\eqref{eq:EG-intro}.\n\nThe main point of this paper is that the semigroup method proves a still stronger statement. The colored quantity is edge-local: every sensitive edge is assigned to one of its two endpoints. We instead allow the boundary charge to flow through the whole cube. Define a vector field\n$\\V=(\\V_1,\\ldots,\\V_n)$ on the cube and set\n\\[\n \\divg \\V(x)=\\sum_{i=1}^n(\\V_i(x)-\\V_i(x^{\\oplus i})).\n\\]\nWith\n\\[\n D_i g(x)=\\frac{g(x)-g(x^{\\oplus i})}{2},\n \\qquad L=\\sum_iD_i,\n\\]\nthe Beckmann boundary is\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:B-intro}\n \\B(f)=\\inf\\left\\{\n \\E\\|\\V(x)\\|_2:\\ \\divg \\V=Lf\n \\right\\}.\n\\end{equation}\nThe terminology is motivated by the Beckmann formulation of optimal transport \\cite{Beckmann}: one minimizes an $L^1$ norm of a vector field subject to a prescribed divergence. Here the local norm is the Euclidean norm in the coordinate directions of the cube.\n\nThis functional is no larger than any colored boundary. Indeed, a red edge is represented by putting unit field at the $f=1$ endpoint, while a blue edge is represented by putting unit field with the opposite sign at the $f=-1$ endpoint. It is also no larger than the optimized {\\em fractional} colored boundary $\\Tfrac(f)$ (see the next section for the definition), where each sensitive edge may be split fractionally between its two endpoints. More precisely,\n\\[\n \\B(f)\\le \\Tfrac(f)\\le \\Ccol(f)\\le \\Tcol^\\chi(f)\n\\]\nfor every coloring $\\chi$. Thus a lower bound for $\\B(f)$ implies all of the colored, fractional colored, one-sided and two-sided inequalities.\n\nOur main theorem is the following.\n\n\\begin{theorem}[Beckmann--Talagrand inequality]\\label{thm:main}\nThere is a universal constant $c>0$ such that for every $n$ and every nonconstant Boolean function $f:\\{-1,1\\}^n\\to\\{-1,1\\}$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:main}\n \\B(f)\n \\ge\n c\\,\\Var(f)\n \\sqrt{\\log\\!\\left(1+\\frac{1}{M(f)}\\right)},\n \\qquad\n M(f)=\\sum_{i=1}^n\\Inf_i(f)^2 .\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{theorem}\n\nThe proof is short. For any admissible $\\V$ satisfying $\\divg \\V=Lf$, the heat semigroup identity gives\n\\[\n \\ip{f}{(I-P_t)f}\n =\\int_0^t\\ip{Lf}{P_s f}\\,\\dd s\n =\\int_0^t\\ip{\\divg \\V}{P_s f}\\,\\dd s.\n\\]\nIntegration by parts on the cube turns the last inner product into\n\\[\n 2\\sum_i\\ip{\\V_i}{D_iP_s f}.\n\\]\nCauchy--Schwarz and the standard pointwise reverse Poincar\\'e estimate, which follows from the heat-kernel identity \\cite[Lemma~2.1]{IVHV},\n\\[\n \\|DP_s f(x)\\|_2\\le \\frac{\\|f\\|_\\infty}{\\sqrt{e^{2s}-1}}\n\\]\nthen imply\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:intro-Beckmann-Poincar\\'e}\n \\ip{f}{(I-P_t)f}\n \\le\n 2\\arctan\\sqrt{e^{2t}-1}\\,\\E\\|\\V\\|_2 .\n\\end{equation}\nTaking the infimum over $\\V$ and setting $t=1/d$ yields\n\\[\n \\B(f)\\gtrsim \\sqrt d\\,W_{\\ge d}[f]\n\\]\nwith details presented in Section~\\ref{sec:Poincar\\'e}. The theorem follows by combining this high-degree estimate with the usual hypercontractive low-degree estimate \\cite{Bonami,Beckner} and the Keller--Kindler Fourier-tail theorem \\cite{KellerKindler}; see also \\cite[Theorem~3.4]{EKLM} for the precise form used here. The proof of the main theorem is completed in Section~\\ref{sec:main-proof}. In Section~\\ref{sec:Poincar\\'e}, we also prove that $\\B(f) \\leq \\Tfrac(f)\\lesssim \\B(f)\\log(en)$.\n\nThe beckman boundary is a genuine strengthening of the colored theorem of Eldan--Kindler--Lifshitz--Minzer \\cite[Section~3.4]{EKLM}. The quantity $\\B(f)$ may use nonsensitive edges and global cancellations, whereas colorings and fractional colorings are supported on the sensitivity graph. In Section \\ref{sec:examples} we give explicit examples showing that the reverse comparisons fail and summarize the comparisons. A singleton shows that a fixed coloring, a fixed fractional coloring, or a one-sided boundary can exceed $\\B(f)$ by a factor of $\\sqrt n$. More decisively, an explicit quotient-cube family satisfies\n\\[\n \\frac{\\Tfrac(f)}{\\B(f)}\\gtrsim \\sqrt{\\log n}\n \\qquad\\text{and hence}\\qquad\n \\frac{\\Ccol(f)}{\\B(f)}\\gtrsim \\sqrt{\\log n},\n\\]\nso the universal comparison from $\\B$ to optimized fractional or integral colorings has no dimension-free converse. This quantitatively confirms that Theorem \\ref{thm:main} is strictly stronger than the optimized colored-boundary theorem.\n\n\nThe second part of the paper uses more of the heat-kernel identity of Ivanisvili--van Handel--Volberg \\cite[Lemma~2.1]{IVHV}. The Beckmann--Poincar\\'e argument above only uses the rough estimate $\\|DP_tf\\|_2\\lesssim t^{-1/2}$. If one keeps the exact biased Rademacher variables that appear when differentiating the heat kernel, one obtains strong spectral estimates. The most transparent endpoint is the following inequality: for every $\\A\\subset\\Omega_n$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:intro-strong-endpoint}\n \\sum_{S\\ne\\varnothing}\\sqrt{|S|}\\,\\widehat{\\1_{\\A}}(S)^2\n \\lesssim\n \\E\\big[\\sqrt{h_{\\A}(x)}\\log(e+h_{\\A}(x))\\big].\n\\end{equation}\nThe left-hand side is the strong half-moment of the Fourier spectral degree. It is stronger than the weak quantity $\\sup_d\\sqrt d\\,W_{\\ge d}[\\1_{\\A}]$: the weak estimate sees the largest Fourier scale, while \\eqref{eq:intro-strong-endpoint} sums over all scales. Equivalently, \\eqref{eq:intro-strong-endpoint} is an integrated noise-sensitivity estimate for $\\1_{\\A}$.\n\nThe logarithm in \\eqref{eq:intro-strong-endpoint} is a local endpoint correction. It should be distinguished from the global $L_2/L_1$ logarithms in Talagrand's influence inequality \\cite{Talagrand1994}, as revisited in \\cite{CorderoEskenazis}. It is not an artifact of the proof. For majority, the one-sided boundary is supported on the critical layer; there $h_{\\A}\\asymp n$ and the layer has measure $\\asymp n^{-1/2}$, so the right-hand side of \\eqref{eq:intro-strong-endpoint} is $\\asymp\\log n$. The standard Fourier asymptotics of majority \\cite[Section~5.3]{ODonnell} give $W_{=k}(\\mathrm{Maj}_n)\\asymp k^{-3/2}$ over the relevant odd levels, and therefore the left-hand side is also $\\asymp\\log n$. Thus the endpoint is sharp up to constants.\n\nMore generally, we prove a complete first-order spectral moment scale. For $0<\\alpha<1$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:intro-alpha-scale}\n \\sum_{S\\ne\\varnothing}|S|^\\alpha\\widehat{\\1_{\\A}}(S)^2\n \\lesssim_\\alpha\n \\E\\omega_\\alpha(h_{\\A}(x)),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere\n\\[\n \\omega_\\alpha(m)=\n \\begin{cases}\n \\sqrt m, & 0<\\alpha<1/2,\\\\\n \\sqrt m\\log(e+m), & \\alpha=1/2,\\\\\n m^\\alpha, & 1/2<\\alpha<1.\n \\end{cases}\n\\]\n\n\n\\subsection*{Acknowledgments}\nP.I. acknowledges partial support from NSF CAREER grant DMS-2152401, NSF grant DMS-2554183, a Simons Fellowship, and a Humboldt Research Fellowship for Experienced Researchers. H.Z. is supported by NSF DMS-2453408. The authors acknowledge the use of AI tools. All mathematical arguments and proofs in the final manuscript were checked and written by the authors.\n\n\\section{Notation and edge-local boundary functionals}\\label{sec:notation}\n\nThroughout the paper, $\\Omega_n=\\{-1,1\\}^n$ is equipped with the uniform probability measure, and\n\\[\n \\ip{g}{h}:=\\E[g(x)h(x)].\n\\]\nFor $x\\in\\Omega_n$, $x^{\\oplus i}$ denotes the point obtained by flipping the $i$th coordinate. Let\n\\[\n D_i g(x)=\\frac{g(x)-g(x^{\\oplus i})}{2},\n \\qquad\n Lg=\\sum_{i=1}^nD_i g.\n\\]\nThen $D_i$ is a self-adjoint projection on $L^2(\\Omega_n)$ and the Walsh character\n$\\chi_S(x)=\\prod_{i\\in S}x_i$ satisfies\n\\[\n D_i\\chi_S=\\1_{i\\in S}\\chi_S,\n \\qquad\n L\\chi_S=|S|\\chi_S.\n\\]\nThe heat semigroup is $P_t=e^{-tL}$, so\n\\[\n P_t\\chi_S=e^{-t|S|}\\chi_S.\n\\]\nFor any function $\\phi$ on $\\{0,1,\\ldots,n\\}$, the spectral multiplier $\\phi(L)$ is defined by\n\\[\n \\phi(L)\\chi_S=\\phi(|S|)\\chi_S.\n\\]\nFor $f=\\sum_S\\widehat f(S)\\chi_S$, put\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n W_{=d}[f]&=\\sum_{|S|=d}\\widehat f(S)^2,\n &\\qquad\n W_{\\ge d}[f]&=\\sum_{|S|\\ge d}\\widehat f(S)^2,\\\\\n W_{>d}[f]&=\\sum_{|S|>d}\\widehat f(S)^2,\n &\\qquad\n W_{\\le d}[f]&=\\sum_{1\\le |S|\\le d}\\widehat f(S)^2.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nThus $W_{\\le d}$ always denotes the nonconstant Fourier mass up to degree $d$, and\n\\[\n \\Var(f)=\\sum_{S\\ne\\varnothing}\\widehat f(S)^2.\n\\]\nWe write $a\\lesssim b$ if $a\\le Cb$ for a universal constant $C$, and $a\\gtrsim b$ if $b\\lesssim a$.\n\nFor Boolean $f:\\Omega_n\\to\\{-1,1\\}$, define\n\\[\n \\Inf_i(f)=\\E|D_i f|=\\Pr[f(x)\\ne f(x^{\\oplus i})].\n\\]\nThe equality follows from our normalization: on a sensitive edge, $|D_i f|=1$.\n\n\\subsection{Colored and fractional boundaries}\nLet $E_f$ be the set of sensitive edges of $f$. A red--blue coloring $\\chi$ of $E_f$ defines\n\\[\n s_{f,{\\rm red}}(x)\n =\\#\\{i: f(x)=1,\\ f(x^{\\oplus i})=-1,\n \\{x,x^{\\oplus i}\\}\\text{ is red}\\},\n\\]\n\\[\n s_{f,{\\rm blue}}(x)\n =\\#\\{i: f(x)=-1,\\ f(x^{\\oplus i})=1,\n \\{x,x^{\\oplus i}\\}\\text{ is blue}\\}.\n\\]\nThen\n\\[\n \\Tcol^\\chi(f)=\n \\E\\sqrt{s_{f,{\\rm red}}(x)}+\\E\\sqrt{s_{f,{\\rm blue}}(x)}.\n\\]\nThe all-red coloring is the one-sided boundary of $\\A=\\{f=1\\}$, and the all-blue coloring is the one-sided boundary of $\\A^c$. The optimized colored boundary is\n\\[\n \\Ccol(f)=\\inf_\\chi \\Tcol^\\chi(f),\n\\]\nwhere the infimum ranges over all red--blue colorings of $E_f$.\n\nOne may wonder what happens if the coloring assignment were allowed to be fractional. This motivates the following definition. A fractional coloring \\(\\theta:E_f\\to[0,1]\\) assigns a number $\\theta_e\\in[0,1]$ to each sensitive edge $e$. If $e=\\{x,x^{\\oplus i}\\}$ and $f(x)=1$, $f(x^{\\oplus i})=-1$, then $\\theta_e$ is the fraction assigned to the positive endpoint and $1-\\theta_e$ is the fraction assigned to the negative endpoint. Define\n\\[\n \\Ttheta(f)=\\E_x\\left(\n \\sum_{\\substack{i:\\, f(x)=1\\\\ f(x^{\\oplus i})=-1}}\n \\theta_{\\{x,x^{\\oplus i}\\}}^2\n +\n \\sum_{\\substack{i:\\, f(x)=-1\\\\ f(x^{\\oplus i})=1}}\n (1-\\theta_{\\{x,x^{\\oplus i}\\}})^2\n \\right)^{1/2}.\n\\]\nThe optimized fractional colored boundary is\n\\[\n \\Tfrac(f)=\\inf_{\\theta:E_f\\to[0,1]}\\Ttheta(f).\n\\]\n\n\n\\begin{proposition}[Fractional and integral colorings are comparable]\n\\label{prop:fractional-integral-comparable}\nFor every Boolean function \\(f:\\Omega_n\\to\\{-1,1\\}\\),\n\\[\n \\Tfrac(f) \\leq \\Ccol(f)\\le \\sqrt{2}\\,\\Tfrac(f).\n\\]\n\\end{proposition}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nThe first inequality follows directly from the definition, so it remains to prove the second inequality. Fix a fractional coloring \\(\\theta:E_f\\to[0,1]\\). If\n\\(e=\\{x,y\\}\\in E_f\\) with \\(f(x)=1\\) and \\(f(y)=-1\\), then \\(\\theta_e\\)\nis the fraction assigned to the positive endpoint \\(x\\), while \\(1-\\theta_e\\)\nis the fraction assigned to the negative endpoint \\(y\\).\n\nWe randomly round each sensitive edge independently. For\n\\(e=\\{x,y\\}\\in E_f\\), with \\(f(x)=1\\) and \\(f(y)=-1\\), color \\(e\\) red with\nprobability\n\\[\n p_e\n :=\n \\frac{\\theta_e^2}{\\theta_e^2+(1-\\theta_e)^2},\n\\]\nand blue with the complementary probability \\(1-p_e\\). Let \\(\\chi\\) denote\nthe resulting random coloring.\n\nIf \\(f(x)=1\\), then by concavity of the square root,\n\\[\n \\E_\\chi\\sqrt{s_{f,{\\rm red}}(x)}\n \\le\n \\left(\\E_\\chi s_{f,{\\rm red}}(x)\\right)^{1/2}\n =\n \\left(\n \\sum_{\\substack{i:\\,f(x)=1\\\\ f(x^{\\oplus i})=-1}}\n p_{\\{x,x^{\\oplus i}\\}}\n \\right)^{1/2}.\n\\]\nSince\n\\[\n \\theta_e^2+(1-\\theta_e)^2\\ge \\frac12,\n\\]\nwe have\n\\[\n p_e\n =\n \\frac{\\theta_e^2}{\\theta_e^2+(1-\\theta_e)^2}\n \\le\n 2\\theta_e^2.\n\\]\nTherefore\n\\[\n \\E_\\chi\\sqrt{s_{f,{\\rm red}}(x)}\n \\le\n \\sqrt{2}\n \\left(\n \\sum_{\\substack{i:\\,f(x)=1\\\\ f(x^{\\oplus i})=-1}}\n \\theta_{\\{x,x^{\\oplus i}\\}}^2\n \\right)^{1/2}.\n\\]\n\nSimilarly, if \\(f(x)=-1\\), then\n\\[\n 1-p_e\n =\n \\frac{(1-\\theta_e)^2}{\\theta_e^2+(1-\\theta_e)^2}\n \\le\n 2(1-\\theta_e)^2,\n\\]\nand hence\n\\[\n \\E_\\chi\\sqrt{s_{f,{\\rm blue}}(x)}\n \\le\n \\sqrt{2}\n \\left(\n \\sum_{\\substack{i:\\,f(x)=-1\\\\ f(x^{\\oplus i})=1}}\n \\bigl(1-\\theta_{\\{x,x^{\\oplus i}\\}}\\bigr)^2\n \\right)^{1/2}.\n\\]\n\nAveraging over \\(x\\), we obtain\n\\[\n \\E_\\chi \\Tcol^\\chi(f)\n \\le\n \\sqrt{2}\\,\\Ttheta(f).\n\\]\nThus \n\\[\n \\Ccol(f)\\le \\sqrt{2}\\,\\Ttheta(f).\n\\]\nFinally, taking the infimum over all fractional colorings \\(\\theta\\) yields\n\\[\n \\Ccol(f)\\le \\sqrt{2}\\,\\Tfrac(f).\n\\]\n\\end{proof}\n\\begin{remark}\nIn addition to being a natural extension of \\(\\Ccol(f)\\), \\(\\Tfrac(f)\\) coincides, up to a normalization factor of 4, with the row--column norm considered by Ben Efraim and Lust-Piquard in \\cite{BenEfraimLustPiquard} for Boolean-valued functions.\n\\end{remark}\n\n\n\n\n\\subsection{The Beckmann boundary}\nA vector field on the cube is a function\n\\[\n \\V:\\Omega_n\\to\\R^n,\n \\qquad\n \\V(x)=(\\V_1(x),\\ldots,\\V_n(x)).\n\\]\nWe define its divergence by\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:div-def}\n \\divg \\V(x)=\\sum_{i=1}^n\\big(\\V_i(x)-\\V_i(x^{\\oplus i})\\big).\n\\end{equation}\nThe Beckmann boundary of $f$ is\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:B-def}\n \\B(f)=\\inf\\left\\{\n \\E\\|\\V(x)\\|_2:\n \\divg \\V=Lf\n \\right\\}.\n\\end{equation}\nThe feasible set is nonempty. For example, $\\V_i=f/2$ satisfies $\\divg \\V=Lf$.\n\n{\\begin{remark}\\label{rem:endpoint-fields}\nIf $\\V_0$ is a vector field on $\\{-1,1\\}^n$ with $\\divg\\V_0=Lf$, then\n\\[\n \\B(f)\n =\n \\inf_{\\divg H=0}\\E\\|\\V_0(x)+H(x)\\|_2,\n\\]\ni.e., the Beckmann boundary is a quotient norm: adding a divergence-free field\nmay change the representative. This freedom allows nonsensitive edges and\ncancellations, as exploited in the quotient-cube construction of\nTheorem~\\ref{thm:unbounded-separation}.\n\\end{remark}}\n\n\\begin{proposition}[Hierarchy]\\label{prop:hierarchy}\nFor every Boolean function $f$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:hierarchy}\n \\B(f)\\le \\Tfrac(f)\\le \\Ccol(f)\\le \\Tcol^\\chi(f)\n\\end{equation}\nfor every red--blue coloring $\\chi$. In particular,\n\\[\n \\B(f)\\le \\Tcol^\\chi(f)\n\\]\nfor every red--blue coloring $\\chi$, and\n\\[\n \\B(f)\\le \\E\\sqrt{h_{\\{f=1\\}}},\n \\qquad\n \\B(f)\\le \\E\\sqrt{h_{\\{f=-1\\}}}.\n\\]\n\\end{proposition}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nFix a fractional coloring $\\theta$. We build a field $\\V^\\theta$. If $e=\\{x,x^{\\oplus i}\\}$ is sensitive, $f(x)=1$ and $f(x^{\\oplus i})=-1$, set\n\\[\n \\V_i^\\theta(x)=\\theta_e,\n \\qquad\n \\V_i^\\theta(x^{\\oplus i})=\\theta_e-1.\n\\]\nOn nonsensitive edges set the corresponding component equal to $0$. Then on each sensitive edge\n\\[\n \\V_i^\\theta(x)-\\V_i^\\theta(x^{\\oplus i})=1=D_i f(x)\n\\]\nat the positive endpoint, and the same identity with both sides negated holds at the negative endpoint. On nonsensitive edges both sides vanish. Hence\n\\[\n \\divg \\V^\\theta=Lf.\n\\]\nMoreover,\n\\[\n \\E\\|\\V^\\theta(x)\\|_2=\\Ttheta(f).\n\\]\nTaking the infimum over all feasible vector fields gives $\\B(f)\\le\\Ttheta(f)$, and taking the infimum over $\\theta$ gives $\\B(f)\\le\\Tfrac(f)$. Since integral colorings form a subclass of fractional colorings, $\\Tfrac(f)\\le\\Ccol(f)$, while the definition of $\\Ccol$ gives $\\Ccol(f)\\le\\Tcol^\\chi(f)$ for every $\\chi$. The one-sided assertions follow from the all-red and all-blue colorings.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\n\\section{The Beckmann Poincar\\'e inequality}\\label{sec:Poincar\\'e}\n\nWe first recall the standard pointwise reverse Poincar\\'e estimate, which follows from the heat-kernel representation in \\cite[Lemma~2.1]{IVHV}; see also \\cite[Section 6]{ILvHV} for a semigroup argument. Write $Dg:=(D_i g)_{i\\in[n]}$.\n\n\\begin{lemma}[Reverse Poincar\\'e]\\label{lem:reverse-Poincar\\'e}\nFor every $g:\\Omega_n\\to\\R$, every $t>0$ and every $x\\in\\Omega_n$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:reverse-Poincar\\'e}\n \\|DP_tg(x)\\|_2^2\n \\le\n \\frac{P_tg^2(x)-(P_tg(x))^2}{e^{2t}-1}.\n\\end{equation}\nIn particular, if $\\|g\\|_\\infty\\le1$, then\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:reverse-Poincar\\'e-infty}\n \\|DP_tg(x)\\|_2\\le\\frac{1}{\\sqrt{e^{2t}-1}}.\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{lemma}\n\nOne proof is recalled in Appendix \\ref{app:heat-kernel}.\n\n\n\\begin{theorem}[Beckmann--Poincar\\'e inequality]\\label{thm:beckmann-Poincar\\'e}\nLet $f:\\Omega_n\\to\\R$ with $\\|f\\|_\\infty\\le1$. If $\\V$ is a vector field satisfying\n$\\divg \\V=Lf$, then for every $t>0$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:beckmann-Poincar\\'e}\n \\ip{f}{(I-P_t)f}\n \\le\n 2\\arctan\\sqrt{e^{2t}-1}\\,\\E\\|\\V(x)\\|_2.\n\\end{equation}\nConsequently, for $t>0$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:beckmann-Poincar\\'e-small-t}\n \\ip{f}{(I-P_t)f}\n \\lesssim\n \\sqrt t\\,\\B(f).\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{theorem}\n\n\n\\begin{proof}\nSince $P_t=e^{-tL}$,\n\\[\n \\ip{f}{(I-P_t)f}\n =\\int_0^t\\ip{Lf}{P_s f}\\,\\dd s.\n\\]\nUsing $Lf=\\divg \\V$ and the definition \\eqref{eq:div-def},\n\\[\n \\ip{\\divg \\V}{P_s f}\n =\\sum_{i=1}^n\\E\\big[(\\V_i(x)-\\V_i(x^{\\oplus i}))P_s f(x)\\big].\n\\]\nChanging variables $x\\mapsto x^{\\oplus i}$ in the second term gives\n\\[\n \\ip{\\divg \\V}{P_s f}\n =\\sum_{i=1}^n\\E \\V_i(x)\\big(P_s f(x)-P_s f(x^{\\oplus i})\\big)\n =2\\sum_{i=1}^n\\ip{\\V_i}{D_iP_s f}.\n\\]\nTherefore\n\\[\n \\ip{f}{(I-P_t)f}\n =2\\int_0^t\\E\\sum_i \\V_i(x)D_iP_s f(x)\\,\\dd s.\n\\]\nBy Cauchy--Schwarz in the coordinate index and Lemma \\ref{lem:reverse-Poincar\\'e},\n\\[\n \\left| \\E\\sum_i \\V_iD_iP_s f\\right|\n \\le\n \\E\\big[\\|\\V(x)\\|_2\\|DP_s f(x)\\|_2\\big]\n \\le\n \\frac{\\E\\|\\V(x)\\|_2}{\\sqrt{e^{2s}-1}}.\n\\]\nThus\n\\[\n \\ip{f}{(I-P_t)f}\n \\le\n 2\\E\\|\\V\\|_2\\int_0^t\\frac{\\dd s}{\\sqrt{e^{2s}-1}}.\n\\]\nThe integral is explicit:\n\\[\n \\int_0^t\\frac{\\dd s}{\\sqrt{e^{2s}-1}}\n =\\arctan\\sqrt{e^{2t}-1}.\n\\]\nThis gives \\eqref{eq:beckmann-Poincar\\'e}. Taking the infimum over all admissible $\\V$ gives the same estimate with $\\B(f)$ in place of $\\E\\|\\V\\|_2$. Finally,\n\\[\n \\arctan\\sqrt{e^{2t}-1}\\lesssim \\sqrt t\n\\]\nfor $t>0$.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\begin{corollary}[High-degree estimate]\\label{cor:high-degree}\nFor every Boolean $f:\\Omega_n\\to\\{-1,1\\}$ and every $d\\ge1$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:high-degree}\n \\B(f)\\gtrsim \\sqrt d\\,W_{\\ge d}[f].\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{corollary}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nTaking Fourier expansions,\n\\[\n \\ip{f}{(I-P_t)f}\n =\\sum_{S\\ne\\varnothing}(1-e^{-t|S|})\\widehat f(S)^2.\n\\]\nWith $t=1/d$, the terms with $|S|\\ge d$ contribute at least $(1-e^{-1})W_{\\ge d}[f]$. Theorem \\ref{thm:beckmann-Poincar\\'e} gives\n\\[\n W_{\\ge d}[f]\n \\lesssim\n d^{-1/2}\\B(f),\n\\]\nwhich is \\eqref{eq:high-degree}.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\n\\begin{proposition}[Variational formula and strong spectral upper bound]\\label{prop:strong-spectral-upper}\nFor every function $\\rho:\\Omega_n\\to(0,\\infty)$ with $\\E\\rho=1$, define\n\\[\n L_\\rho g(x)\n :=\\sum_{i=1}^n\n \\frac{D_i g(x)}{\\rho(x)+\\rho(x^{\\oplus i})}.\n\\]\nThen $L_\\rho$ is positive and self-adjoint, and every Boolean $f$ satisfies\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Tfrac-variational}\n \\Tfrac(f)^2\n =\\frac12\\inf_{\\substack{\\rho>0\\\\ \\E\\rho=1}}\n \\ip{f}{L_\\rho f}\n =\\frac12\\inf_{\\substack{\\rho>0\\\\ \\E\\rho=1}}\n \\E\\sum_{i=1}^n\n \\frac{(D_i f(x))^2}{\\rho(x)+\\rho(x^{\\oplus i})}.\n\\end{equation}\nConsequently,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:strong-spectral-upper}\n \\B(f)\\le \\Tfrac(f)\n \\le \\frac12\\ip{f}{L^{1/2}f}\n =\\frac12\\sum_{k=1}^n\\sqrt{k}\\,W_{=k}[f].\n\\end{equation}\nIn particular, Corollary \\ref{cor:high-degree} and summation by parts give\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:weak-strong-sandwich}\n \\sup_{1\\le d\\le n}\\sqrt d\\,W_{\\ge d}[f]\n \\lesssim \\B(f)\n \\le \\frac12\\sum_{d=1}^n\n (\\sqrt d-\\sqrt{d-1})W_{\\ge d}[f].\n\\end{equation}\nThe factor $1/2$ in \\eqref{eq:strong-spectral-upper} is sharp.\n\\end{proposition}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nPut $N=2^n$. For every incidence of a sensitive edge $e$ at a vertex\n$x$, let $a_{x,e}$ be the fraction of $e$ assigned to $x$. Thus\n$a_{x,e}\\in[0,1]$ and $a_{x,e}+a_{y,e}=1$ whenever\n$e=\\{x,y\\}\\in E_f$, and\n\\[\n N\\Tfrac(f)\n =\\inf_a\\sum_{x\\in\\Omega_n}\n \\left(\\sum_{\\substack{e\\in E_f\\\\e\\ni x}}a_{x,e}^2\\right)^{1/2}.\n\\]\nUsing\n\\[\n \\|u\\|_2\n =\\inf_{r>0}\\frac12\\left(r+\\frac{\\|u\\|_2^2}{r}\\right)\n\\]\nat each vertex gives\n\\[\n N\\Tfrac(f)\n =\\frac12\\inf_{\\substack{r_x>0\\\\a_{x,e}+a_{y,e}=1}}\n \\left[\n \\sum_x r_x+\n \\sum_x\\sum_{e\\ni x}\\frac{a_{x,e}^2}{r_x}\n \\right].\n\\]\nFor fixed $r$, the minimization separates over the sensitive edges. On\n$e=\\{x,y\\}$,\n\\[\n \\inf_{a+b=1}\\left(\\frac{a^2}{r_x}+\\frac{b^2}{r_y}\\right)\n =\\frac1{r_x+r_y},\n\\]\nwith minimizer\n\\[\n a=\\frac{r_x}{r_x+r_y},\n \\qquad\n b=\\frac{r_y}{r_x+r_y}.\n\\]\nHence\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Tfrac-r-variational}\n N\\Tfrac(f)\n =\\frac12\\inf_{r_x>0}\n \\left[\n \\sum_x r_x+\n \\sum_{\\{x,y\\}\\in E_f}\\frac1{r_x+r_y}\n \\right].\n\\end{equation}\nSince each undirected sensitive edge is counted at both endpoints,\n\\eqref{eq:Tfrac-r-variational} is equivalently\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Tfrac-r-normalized}\n \\Tfrac(f)\n =\\inf_{r>0}\\left\\{\n \\frac12\\E r+\n \\frac14\\E\\sum_{i=1}^n\n \\frac{(D_i f(x))^2}{r(x)+r(x^{\\oplus i})}\n \\right\\}.\n\\end{equation}\nWrite $r=c\\rho$, where $c>0$ and $\\E\\rho=1$. For fixed $\\rho$, the\nright-hand side of \\eqref{eq:Tfrac-r-normalized} becomes\n\\[\n \\frac c2+\\frac1{4c}\n \\E\\sum_{i=1}^n\n \\frac{(D_i f(x))^2}{\\rho(x)+\\rho(x^{\\oplus i})}.\n\\]\nMinimizing over $c>0$ proves \\eqref{eq:Tfrac-variational}. Indeed, if\n$w_i(x)=(\\rho(x)+\\rho(x^{\\oplus i}))^{-1}$, then\n$w_i(x)=w_i(x^{\\oplus i})$, so multiplication by $w_i$ commutes with\n$D_i$. It follows that $L_\\rho=\\sum_iM_{w_i}D_i$ is positive and\nself-adjoint and that\n\\[\n \\ip{f}{L_\\rho f}\n =\\E\\sum_iw_i(x)(D_i f(x))^2.\n\\]\n\nIt remains to prove the upper bound in \\eqref{eq:strong-spectral-upper}.\nThe assertion is trivial when $f$ is constant, so assume that $f$ is\nnonconstant and put\n\\[\n H:=\\ip{f}{L^{1/2}f}>0,\n \\qquad Q_t:=e^{-tL^{1/2}}.\n\\]\nChoose the density\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Poisson-rho}\n \\rho(x):=\\frac2H\\int_0^\\infty\n \\left|\\partial_tQ_tf(x)\\right|^2\\,\\dd t.\n\\end{equation}\nSince $Q_t f\\to\\E f$ as $t\\to\\infty$ and $f(x)\\ne\\E f$ at every\n$x$, this density is strictly positive. Moreover,\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n \\E\\rho\n =\\frac2H\\int_0^\\infty\n \\|\\partial_tQ_tf\\|_2^2\\,\\dd t\n =\\frac2H\\int_0^\\infty\n \\ip{Q_tf}{LQ_tf}\\,\\dd t\n =1,\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nbecause the spectral decomposition of $L$ gives\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Poisson-energy}\n \\int_0^\\infty\\ip{Q_tf}{LQ_tf}\\,\\dd t\n =\\frac12\\ip{f}{L^{1/2}f}\n =\\frac H2.\n\\end{equation}\n\nLet $y=x^{\\oplus i}$ be a sensitive neighbor of $x$, and set\n\\[\n h(t):=Q_tf(x)-Q_tf(y).\n\\]\nThen $h(0)^2=4$ and $h(t)\\to0$. Integration by parts followed by\nCauchy--Schwarz yields\n\\[\n 4=-\\int_0^\\infty (h(t)^2)'\\,\\dd t\n \\le2\\left(\\int_0^\\infty h(t)^2\\,\\dd t\\right)^{1/2}\n \\left(\\int_0^\\infty h'(t)^2\\,\\dd t\\right)^{1/2}.\n\\]\nOn the other hand,\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n \\int_0^\\infty h'(t)^2\\,\\dd t\n \\le2\\int_0^\\infty\\left(\n |\\partial_tQ_tf(x)|^2+|\\partial_tQ_tf(y)|^2\n \\right)\\,\\dd t\n =H\\bigl(\\rho(x)+\\rho(y)\\bigr).\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nWriting $A=\\int_0^\\infty h(t)^2\\,\\dd t$ and\n$B=\\int_0^\\infty h'(t)^2\\,\\dd t$, the preceding two estimates give\n$AB\\ge4$ and $B\\le H(\\rho(x)+\\rho(y))$. Therefore\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:rho-edge-bound}\n \\frac1{\\rho(x)+\\rho(y)}\n \\le\\frac H4\\int_0^\\infty\n \\bigl(Q_tf(x)-Q_tf(y)\\bigr)^2\\,\\dd t\n\\end{equation}\nfor every sensitive edge $\\{x,y\\}$.\n\nInsert \\eqref{eq:Poisson-rho} into \\eqref{eq:Tfrac-variational}. Since\n$(D_i f)^2$ is the indicator that the $i$th edge at $x$ is sensitive,\n\\eqref{eq:rho-edge-bound} and $(D_i f)^2\\le1$ give\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n 2\\Tfrac(f)^2\n &\\le\\E\\sum_{i=1}^n\n \\frac{(D_i f(x))^2}{\\rho(x)+\\rho(x^{\\oplus i})}\\\\\n &\\le\\frac H4\\int_0^\\infty\n \\E\\sum_{i=1}^n\n \\bigl(Q_tf(x)-Q_tf(x^{\\oplus i})\\bigr)^2\\,\\dd t\\\\\n &=H\\int_0^\\infty\\ip{Q_tf}{LQ_tf}\\,\\dd t\n =\\frac{H^2}{2},\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nwhere the last equality is \\eqref{eq:Poisson-energy}. Thus\n$\\Tfrac(f)\\le H/2$. Proposition \\ref{prop:hierarchy} gives\n$\\B(f)\\le\\Tfrac(f)$, and the Fourier identity in\n\\eqref{eq:strong-spectral-upper} follows from the spectral decomposition\nof $L$. Summation by parts gives \\eqref{eq:weak-strong-sandwich}.\n\nFinally, let $f=\\chi_S$ with $|S|=d\\ge1$. The choice $\\rho\\equiv1$ in\n\\eqref{eq:Tfrac-variational} gives $\\Tfrac(f)\\le\\sqrt d/2$. Conversely,\nfor every admissible $\\rho$, Jensen's inequality gives\n\\[\n \\E\\frac1{\\rho(x)+\\rho(x^{\\oplus i})}\n \\ge\\frac1{\\E\\rho(x)+\\E\\rho(x^{\\oplus i})}\n =\\frac12\n\\]\nfor each $i\\in S$. Hence \\eqref{eq:Tfrac-variational} gives\n$\\Tfrac(f)\\ge\\sqrt d/2$, proving sharpness.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\n\\begin{corollary}[Logarithmic reverse Beckmann--fractional comparison]\n\\label{log-reverse-beckmann-fractional}\nFor every Boolean function \\(f:\\Omega_n\\to\\{-1,1\\}\\),\n\\[\n \\Tfrac(f)\\lesssim \\B(f)\\log(en).\n\\]\n\\end{corollary}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nBy \\eqref{eq:strong-spectral-upper} and the summation-by-parts identity\nused in \\eqref{eq:weak-strong-sandwich},\n\\[\n \\Tfrac(f)\n \\le\n \\frac12\\sum_{d=1}^n\n \\bigl(\\sqrt d-\\sqrt{d-1}\\bigr)W_{\\ge d}[f].\n\\]\nOn the other hand, the left inequality in \\eqref{eq:weak-strong-sandwich}\nimplies, for every \\(1\\le d\\le n\\),\n\\[\n W_{\\ge d}[f]\\lesssim \\frac{\\B(f)}{\\sqrt d}.\n\\]\nTherefore\n\\[\n \\Tfrac(f)\n \\lesssim\n \\B(f)\n \\sum_{d=1}^n\n \\frac{\\sqrt d-\\sqrt{d-1}}{\\sqrt d}.\n\\]\nFinally,\n\\[\n \\frac{\\sqrt d-\\sqrt{d-1}}{\\sqrt d}\n =\n \\frac{1}{\\sqrt d(\\sqrt d+\\sqrt{d-1})}\n \\le \\frac1d,\n\\]\nand hence\n\\[\n \\sum_{d=1}^n\n \\frac{\\sqrt d-\\sqrt{d-1}}{\\sqrt d}\n \\le\n \\sum_{d=1}^n\\frac1d\n \\le\n \\log(en).\n\\]\nThe claim follows.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\n\\section{Proof of the Beckmann--Talagrand inequality}\\label{sec:main-proof}\n\nWe need two standard Fourier ingredients. The first is a standard consequence of Bonami--Beckner hypercontractivity \\cite{Bonami,Beckner}, equivalently of the usual small-set/level-$d$\nFourier estimates; see \\cite[Chapter 9.5]{ODonnell}.\n\n\n\\begin{lemma}[Low-degree mass from hypercontractivity]\\label{lem:low-degree-var}\nThere are universal constants $c_0,c_1,c_2>0$ such that for every nonconstant Boolean $f:\\Omega_n\\to\\{-1,1\\}$ there is an integer\n\\[\n c_0\\log(e/\\Var(f)) \\le d\\le c_1 \\log(e/\\Var(f))\n\\]\nfor which\n\\[\n W_{\\ge d}[f]\\ge c_2\\Var(f).\n\\]\nConsequently,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:B-classical}\n \\B(f)\\gtrsim \\Var(f)\\sqrt{\\log(e/\\Var(f))}.\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{lemma}\n\nThe second ingredient is the Keller--Kindler quantitative Fourier-tail theorem \\cite{KellerKindler}, in the form recorded in \\cite[Theorem~3.4]{EKLM}.\n\n\\begin{theorem}[Keller--Kindler Fourier tail]\\label{thm:KK}\nThere exist constants $a_1,a_2>0$ such that for every Boolean function $f$ with\n$M(f)=\\sum_i\\Inf_i(f)^2$ sufficiently small,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:KK-tail}\n W_{\\le a_1\\log(1/M(f))}[f]\n \\le\n M(f)^{a_2}.\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{theorem}\n\nThe cited formulation is commonly stated for a function $g:\\Omega_n\\to\\{0,1\\}$ using the flip-probability influence\n\\[\n I_i(g):=\\Pr[g(x)\\ne g(x^{\\oplus i})].\n\\]\nTo pass to our convention, set $g=(1+f)/2$. Then\n\\[\n I_i(g)=\\Inf_i(f).\n\\]\nNotice that this is not the same as $\\E|D_i g|$: with our difference operator, $D_i g=D_i f/2$ and hence $\\E|D_i g|=\\Inf_i(f)/2$. For every nonempty $S$,\n\\[\n \\widehat g(S)=\\frac12\\widehat f(S),\n\\]\nso\n\\[\n W_{\\le d}[g]=\\frac14W_{\\le d}[f].\n\\]\nThus the cited theorem first gives $W_{\\le d}[f]\\le4M(f)^c$ for some universal $c>0$. Replacing $c$ by $a_2=c/2$ and decreasing the smallness threshold for $M$ so that $4M^c\\le M^{c/2}$ yields Theorem \\ref{thm:KK} exactly as stated.\n\nWe now prove Theorem \\ref{thm:main}.\n\n\\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \\ref{thm:main}]\nLet $v=\\Var(f)$ and $M=M(f)$. Fix the smallness threshold in Theorem \\ref{thm:KK} sufficiently small that, whenever it applies,\n\\[\n d=\\lfloor a_1\\log(1/M)\\rfloor\\ge1\n \\qquad\\text{and}\\qquad\n d\\asymp \\log(1/M).\n\\]\nIf $M$ is bounded below by that absolute threshold, then\n\\[\n v\\sqrt{\\log(1+1/M)}\\lesssim v,\n\\]\nand Lemma \\ref{lem:low-degree-var} gives $\\B(f)\\gtrsim v$. Thus we may assume that $M$ is small enough for Theorem \\ref{thm:KK} and, in particular, $M\\le1/2$.\n\nThere are two cases. First suppose\n\\[\n M^{a_2}>\\frac12v.\n\\]\nThen $M>(v/2)^{1/a_2}$, and therefore\n\\[\n \\frac1M<\\left(\\frac2v\\right)^{1/a_2}.\n\\]\nIt follows that\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n \\log(1+1/M)\n \\le \\log\\left(1+(2/v)^{1/a_2}\\right)\n \\le C_{a_2}\\log(e/v).\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nLemma \\ref{lem:low-degree-var} consequently gives\n\\[\n \\B(f)\n \\gtrsim\n v\\sqrt{\\log(e/v)}\n \\gtrsim\n v\\sqrt{\\log(1+1/M)}.\n\\]\n\nNow suppose\n\\[\n M^{a_2}\\le \\frac12v.\n\\]\nSet\n\\[\n d=\\lfloor a_1\\log(1/M)\\rfloor.\n\\]\nBy Theorem \\ref{thm:KK},\n\\[\n W_{\\le d}[f]\\le\\frac12v.\n\\]\nSince the total nonconstant Fourier mass is $v$,\n\\[\n W_{>d}[f]\\ge\\frac12v.\n\\]\nBecause $W_{>d}[f]=W_{\\ge d+1}[f]$, Corollary \\ref{cor:high-degree} yields\n\\[\n \\B(f)\n \\gtrsim\n \\sqrt{d+1}\\,W_{>d}[f]\n \\gtrsim\n v\\sqrt{\\log(1/M)}.\n\\]\nFinally, when $0<M\\le1/2$,\n\\[\n \\log(1/M)\\le\\log(1+1/M)\\le\\log(2/M)\\le2\\log(1/M),\n\\]\nso $\\log(1+1/M)\\asymp\\log(1/M)$. This gives \\eqref{eq:main} in the second case and completes the proof.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\begin{corollary}[Colored, fractional and one-sided consequences]\\label{cor:consequences}\nFor every nonconstant Boolean $f:\\Omega_n\\to\\{-1,1\\}$,\n\\[\n \\Tfrac(f)\n \\ge\n c\\,\\Var(f)\n \\sqrt{\\log\\!\\left(1+\\frac{1}{M(f)}\\right)}.\n\\]\nThe same lower bound holds for $\\Ccol(f)$ and for $\\Tcol^\\chi(f)$ for every red--blue coloring $\\chi$. In particular, if $\\A=\\{f=1\\}$, then\n\\[\n \\E\\sqrt{h_{\\A}}\n \\ge\n c\\,\\Var(f)\n \\sqrt{\\log\\!\\left(1+\\frac{1}{M(f)}\\right)}.\n\\]\n\\end{corollary}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nThis is immediate from Theorem \\ref{thm:main} and Proposition \\ref{prop:hierarchy}.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\section{Duality and comparison examples}\\label{sec:examples}\n\nThis section records concrete examples showing that $\\B(f)$ is a genuinely smaller object than edge-local colorings.\n\n\\subsection{Dual formulation}\nThe following dual form is useful for exact computations.\n\n\\begin{proposition}[Dual Beckmann formulation]\\label{prop:dual}\nFor every Boolean $f$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:dual}\n \\B(f)=\n \\sup\\left\\{\n \\E\\phi(x)Lf(x):\n 2\\|D\\phi(x)\\|_2\\le1\\ \\text{for all }x\n \\right\\}.\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{proposition}\n\nThe proof is recalled in Appendix \\ref{app:duality}.\n\n\\subsection{A fixed coloring or one-sided boundary can be larger by \\texorpdfstring{$\\sqrt n$}{sqrt(n)}}\nLet $o=(-1,\\ldots,-1)$ and define\n\\[\n f_n(o)=-1,\n \\qquad\n f_n(x)=1\\quad\\text{for }x\\ne o.\n\\]\nThen the sensitivity graph consists of the $n$ edges adjacent to $o$.\n\n\\begin{proposition}\\label{prop:singleton}\nFor the above function,\n\\[\n \\B(f_n)=\\frac{\\sqrt n}{2^n}.\n\\]\nOn the other hand, for the one-sided boundary of $\\{f_n=1\\}$, equivalently for the all-red coloring,\n\\[\n \\E\\sqrt{h_{\\{f_n=1\\}}}=\\frac{n}{2^n}.\n\\]\nThus\n\\[\n \\frac{\\E\\sqrt{h_{\\{f_n=1\\}}}}{\\B(f_n)}=\\sqrt n.\n\\]\nThe same example also gives a fixed fractional coloring $\\theta\\equiv1$ for which\n$\\Ttheta(f_n)/\\B(f_n)=\\sqrt n$.\n\\end{proposition}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nFor the upper bound on $\\B(f_n)$, define $\\V_i(o)=-1$ for every $i$ and set all other components equal to $0$. Then $\\divg \\V=Lf_n$. Indeed, $Lf_n(o)=-n$, each neighbor of $o$ has $Lf_n=1$, and all other vertices have $Lf_n=0$. The cost is\n\\[\n \\E\\|\\V\\|_2=\\frac{\\sqrt n}{2^n}.\n\\]\n\nFor the matching lower bound, use the dual formulation. Let\n\\[\n \\phi(x)=\\frac{\\dist(x,o)}{\\sqrt n}.\n\\]\nFlipping one coordinate changes $\\phi$ by $1/\\sqrt n$, hence\n\\[\n 2\\|D\\phi(x)\\|_2\\le1\n\\]\nfor every $x$. Therefore $\\phi$ is dual-admissible. Since $Lf_n(o)=-n$, $Lf_n=1$ on the $n$ neighbors of $o$, and $\\phi(o)=0$, $\\phi=1/\\sqrt n$ on those neighbors,\n\\[\n \\E\\phi Lf_n=\\frac{\\sqrt n}{2^n}.\n\\]\nThis proves $\\B(f_n)=\\sqrt n/2^n$.\n\nThe one-sided boundary of $\\{f_n=1\\}$ consists of the $n$ neighbors of $o$, each with one outgoing edge. Hence\n\\[\n \\E\\sqrt{h_{\\{f_n=1\\}}}=\\frac{n}{2^n}.\n\\]\nThe all-red coloring and the fixed fractional coloring $\\theta\\equiv1$ give the same cost.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\begin{remark}\nReplacing $f_n$ by $-f_n$ reverses the roles of the two sides of the cut. Thus the two one-sided boundaries are not comparable to each other by dimension-free constants. The Beckmann boundary is below both.\n\\end{remark}\n\n\\subsection{A fractional packing lower bound}\nThe next elementary dual bound for fractional endpoint assignments will be used in the quotient-cube construction.\n\n\\begin{lemma}[Fractional packing]\\label{lem:fractional-packing}\nSuppose nonnegative numbers $(\\lambda_e)_{e\\in E_f}$ satisfy\n\\[\n \\sum_{e\\ni x}\\lambda_e^2\\le1\n \\qquad\\text{for every }x\\in\\Omega_n.\n\\]\nThen\n\\[\n \\Tfrac(f)\\ge 2^{-n}\\sum_{e\\in E_f}\\lambda_e.\n\\]\n\\end{lemma}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nFor a fractional coloring, write $a_{x,e}\\ge0$ for the weight assigned to endpoint $x$ of a sensitive edge $e=\\{x,y\\}$, so $a_{x,e}+a_{y,e}=1$. Then\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n \\sum_{e\\in E_f}\\lambda_e\n &=\\sum_{x\\in\\Omega_n}\\sum_{e\\ni x}\\lambda_ea_{x,e}\\\\\n &\\le\\sum_{x\\in\\Omega_n}\n \\left(\\sum_{e\\ni x}\\lambda_e^2\\right)^{1/2}\n \\left(\\sum_{e\\ni x}a_{x,e}^2\\right)^{1/2}\\\\\n &\\le\\sum_{x\\in\\Omega_n}\n \\left(\\sum_{e\\ni x}a_{x,e}^2\\right)^{1/2}.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nDivide by $2^n$ and take the infimum over all fractional colorings.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\subsection{An unbounded separation from optimized colorings}\nWe now give a sequence for which even the optimized colored boundary is larger than the Beckmann boundary by an unbounded factor.\n\n\\begin{theorem}[Unbounded reverse separation]\\label{thm:unbounded-separation}\nFor every $k\\ge1$ there is a Boolean function $f_k$ on a cube of dimension\n\\[\n n_k=\\frac{2^{k+2}(4^k-1)}{3}\n\\]\nsuch that\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:unbounded-ratio}\n \\frac{\\Tfrac(f_k)}{\\B(f_k)}\n \\ge \\frac{3}{4\\sqrt6}\\sqrt{k}.\n\\end{equation}\nConsequently,\n\\[\n \\frac{\\Ccol(f_k)}{\\B(f_k)}\n \\ge \\frac{3}{4\\sqrt6}\\sqrt{k}\n \\gtrsim \\sqrt{\\log n_k}\\longrightarrow\\infty.\n\\]\nIn particular, there is no dimension-free constant $C$ such that\n$\\Ccol(f)\\le C\\B(f)$ for every Boolean function $f$.\n\\end{theorem}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nWe identify a discrete cube with a vector space over $\\mathbb F_2$. Let\n\\[\n G_k=\\mathbb F_2^k.\n\\]\nFor $z\\ne0$, define\n\\[\n \\ell(z)=\\min\\{r:z_r=1\\},\n \\qquad \\ell(0)=k+1,\n\\]\nand put\n\\[\n E_r=\\{z\\in G_k:\\ell(z)=r\\},\n \\qquad m_r=|E_r|.\n\\]\nThus\n\\[\n m_r=2^{k-r}\\quad(1\\le r\\le k),\n \\qquad m_{k+1}=1.\n\\]\nDefine the alternating-level function\n\\[\n g_k(z)=(-1)^{\\ell(z)}.\n\\]\nFor $1\\le r\\le k$, let\n\\[\n w_r=8^r=2^{3r}.\n\\]\nFor every $a\\in G_k\\setminus\\{0\\}$, introduce $w_{\\ell(a)}$ cube coordinates carrying the label $a$. More precisely, set\n\\[\n I_k=\\{(a,s):a\\ne0,\\ 1\\le s\\le w_{\\ell(a)}\\}\n\\]\nand define the surjective linear map\n\\[\n \\pi_k:\\mathbb F_2^{I_k}\\longrightarrow G_k,\n \\qquad\n \\pi_k(x)=\\sum_{(a,s)\\in I_k}x_{a,s}a.\n\\]\nSurjectivity follows because every standard basis vector of $G_k$ occurs as a label. Finally, set\n\\[\n f_k=g_k\\circ\\pi_k.\n\\]\nThe dimension of its cube is\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:nk-dimension}\n n_k=|I_k|\n =\\sum_{r=1}^k m_rw_r\n =\\sum_{r=1}^k2^{k-r}8^r\n =\\frac{2^{k+2}(4^k-1)}3.\n\\end{equation}\n\n\nFigure \\ref{fig:quotient-cube-four-layers} records the local geometry of this lift. If\n$\\pi_k(x)=y\\in E_r$ and $z\\in E_{r+1}$, then the unique quotient label joining\nthem is $a=y+z\\in E_r$. For every $1\\le s\\le w_r$, the coordinate flip\n$x'=x+e_{(a,s)}$ is a distinct cube neighbor of $x$ satisfying\n$\\pi_k(x')=z$.\n\n\\begin{figure}[htbp]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.98\\textwidth]{quotient-cube-four-layers.png}\n \\caption{The four layers in the quotient-cube construction. The vertical\n arrows show the projections $x\\mapsto y=\\pi_k(x)$ and\n $x'\\mapsto z=\\pi_k(x')$. For fixed $y\\in E_r$ and $z\\in E_{r+1}$,\n the label $a=y+z\\in E_r$ has multiplicity $w_r$, producing the neighbors\n $x'=x+e_{(a,s)}$, $1\\le s\\le w_r$.}\n \\label{fig:quotient-cube-four-layers}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\smallskip\n\\noindent\\emph{Lower bound for the optimized fractional boundary.}\nFor $1\\le r\\le k$, assign the weight\n\\[\n \\lambda_r=\\frac1{\\sqrt{3m_{r+1}w_r}}\n\\]\nto every sensitive cube edge whose quotient endpoints lie in $E_r$ and $E_{r+1}$, and assign weight $0$ to all other sensitive edges. Consecutive levels have opposite signs, so every selected edge is sensitive.\n\nWe verify the relevant degree counts. Fix $z\\in E_r$ and $y\\in E_{r+1}$. The unique quotient label that sends $z$ to $y$ is $a=z+y$. Its first nonzero coordinate is $r$, so $a\\in E_r$ and it occurs among the cube coordinates with multiplicity $w_r$. Hence every quotient point in $E_r$ has exactly $m_{r+1}w_r$ selected coordinate directions to $E_{r+1}$. Similarly, for $r\\ge2$, every point in $E_r$ has exactly $m_{r-1}w_{r-1}$ selected directions to $E_{r-1}$.\n\nAt a vertex whose quotient lies in $E_r$, the selected edges going to $E_{r+1}$ contribute\n\\[\n m_{r+1}w_r\\lambda_r^2=\\frac13\n\\]\nto the sum of squared incident weights. For $2\\le r\\le k$, the selected edges going to $E_{r-1}$ contribute\n\\[\n m_{r-1}w_{r-1}\\lambda_{r-1}^2\n =\\frac{m_{r-1}}{3m_r}\n =\\frac23.\n\\]\nAt the first level only the first contribution is present. At the zero quotient $E_{k+1}=\\{0\\}$, the selected edges to $E_k$ contribute\n\\[\n m_kw_k\\lambda_k^2=\\frac13.\n\\]\nHence the hypothesis of Lemma \\ref{lem:fractional-packing} is satisfied at every cube vertex.\n\nEvery fiber of $\\pi_k$ has size $2^{n_k-k}$. Counting each selected edge from its endpoint over $E_r$, the number of selected cube edges between the fibers over $E_r$ and $E_{r+1}$ is\n\\[\n 2^{n_k-k}m_rm_{r+1}w_r.\n\\]\nLemma \\ref{lem:fractional-packing} therefore yields\n\\begin{align}\n \\Tfrac(f_k)\n \\ge \\frac1{2^k}\\sum_{r=1}^k\n m_rm_{r+1}w_r\\lambda_r \\notag\n =\\frac1{2^k\\sqrt3}\\sum_{r=1}^k\n m_r\\sqrt{m_{r+1}w_r}.\n \\label{eq:Tfrac-quotient-lower}\n\\end{align}\nFor $r<k$,\n\\[\n m_r\\sqrt{m_{r+1}w_r}\n =2^{k-r}\\sqrt{2^{k-r-1}2^{3r}}\n =2^{(3k-1)/2},\n\\]\nand for $r=k$ the term equals $2^{3k/2}$, which is larger. Therefore\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Tfrac-quotient-final}\n \\Tfrac(f_k)\\ge \\frac{k}{\\sqrt6}\\,2^{k/2}.\n\\end{equation}\n\n\n\\smallskip\n\\noindent\\emph{Upper bound for the Beckmann boundary.}\nWe construct an admissible vector field directly. Define the quotient charge\n$q:G_k\\to\\mathbb R$ by\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:quotient-charge}\n q(z)=\\frac12\\sum_{a\\ne0}w_{\\ell(a)}\n \\bigl(g_k(z)-g_k(z+a)\\bigr).\n\\end{equation}\nSince each label $a$ occurs among the cube coordinates with multiplicity\n$w_{\\ell(a)}$, we have\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Lf-quotient-charge}\n Lf_k(x)=q(\\pi_k(x)).\n\\end{equation}\nMoreover,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:quotient-charge-zero-sum}\n \\sum_{z\\in G_k}q(z)=0,\n\\end{equation}\nbecause for every fixed $a$, translation by $a$ permutes $G_k$.\n\nFor $1\\le r\\le k$, let $d_r$ be the number of sensitive coordinate directions\nat a quotient point $z\\in E_r$, counted with label multiplicity. This number\ndepends only on $r$. Indeed, a label in $E_j$ with $j<r$ sends $z$ to $E_j$,\nand the direction is sensitive exactly when $j\\not\\equiv r\\pmod2$; a label in\n$E_j$ with $j>r$ leaves the quotient in $E_r$ and is not sensitive. Finally,\nlabels in $E_r$ send $z$ to the levels $E_s$, $s>r$, with exactly $m_s$ labels\nleading to $E_s$, each occurring with multiplicity $w_r$. Consequently,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:dr-formula}\n d_r=\n \\sum_{\\substack{j<r\\\\ j\\not\\equiv r\\ ({\\rm mod}\\ 2)}}m_jw_j\n +w_r\\sum_{\\substack{s>r\\\\ s\\not\\equiv r\\ ({\\rm mod}\\ 2)}}m_s,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere the second sum includes $s=k+1$. The two unrestricted sums satisfy\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n \\sum_{j<r}m_jw_j\n &=2^k\\sum_{j=1}^{r-1}4^j\n <\\frac13\\,2^{k+2r}\n =\\frac13m_rw_r,\\\\\n \\sum_{s=r+1}^{k+1}m_s\n &=\\sum_{s=r+1}^{k}2^{k-s}+1\n =2^{k-r}=m_r.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nTherefore\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:dr-upper}\n d_r\\le\\frac43m_rw_r.\n\\end{equation}\nEvery sensitive direction at a point over $E_r$ contributes $(-1)^r$ to\n$Lf_k$, and hence\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:q-on-level}\n q(z)=(-1)^rd_r\n \\qquad(z\\in E_r).\n\\end{equation}\n\nFor a cube coordinate $(a,s)\\in I_k$, define\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:direct-vector-field}\n \\V_{(a,s)}(x)\n =-\\frac{q(a)}{w_{\\ell(a)}}\\,\n \\1_{\\{\\pi_k(x)=0\\}}.\n\\end{equation}\nWe check its divergence. Suppose first that $\\pi_k(x)=z\\ne0$. Then\n$\\V_{(a,s)}(x)=0$ for every $(a,s)$, and the neighbor\n$x+e_{(a,s)}$ lies in the zero fiber exactly when $a=z$. Hence\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n \\divg\\V(x)\n &=-\\sum_{s=1}^{w_{\\ell(z)}}\n \\V_{(z,s)}(x+e_{(z,s)})\n =q(z).\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nIf $\\pi_k(x)=0$, every neighbor $x+e_{(a,s)}$ has nonzero quotient $a$, so\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n \\divg\\V(x)\n &=\\sum_{a\\ne0}\\sum_{s=1}^{w_{\\ell(a)}}\n \\V_{(a,s)}(x)\n =-\\sum_{a\\ne0}q(a)\n =q(0),\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nwhere the last equality follows from \\eqref{eq:quotient-charge-zero-sum}.\nTogether with \\eqref{eq:Lf-quotient-charge}, this proves\n$\\divg\\V=Lf_k$.\n\nThe field is supported on the zero fiber. At every point in that fiber,\n\\begin{align*}\n \\|\\V(x)\\|_2^2\n =\\sum_{a\\ne0}\\sum_{s=1}^{w_{\\ell(a)}}\n \\frac{q(a)^2}{w_{\\ell(a)}^2}\n =\\sum_{r=1}^k\\frac{m_rd_r^2}{w_r},\n\\end{align*}\nwhere we used \\eqref{eq:q-on-level}. Since $\\pi_k$ is surjective, a uniform\ncube point lies in the zero fiber with probability $2^{-k}$. Thus, by the\ndefinition of $\\B$ and \\eqref{eq:dr-upper},\n\\begin{align*}\n \\B(f_k)\n \\le \\E\\|\\V(x)\\|_2\n =2^{-k}\\left(\\sum_{r=1}^k\\frac{m_rd_r^2}{w_r}\\right)^{1/2}\n \\le\\frac43\\,2^{-k}\n \\left(\\sum_{r=1}^k m_r^3w_r\\right)^{1/2}.\n\\end{align*}\nSince\n\\[\n m_r^3w_r=2^{3(k-r)}2^{3r}=2^{3k}\n\\]\nfor every $1\\le r\\le k$, we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:B-quotient-upper}\n \\B(f_k)\\le\\frac43\\sqrt{k}\\,2^{k/2}.\n\\end{equation}\nCombining \\eqref{eq:Tfrac-quotient-final} and \\eqref{eq:B-quotient-upper} proves \\eqref{eq:unbounded-ratio}. Finally, $\\Tfrac(f_k)\\le\\Ccol(f_k)$, while\n\\[\n 2^{3k}\\le n_k\\le\\frac43\\,2^{3k}\n\\]\nby \\eqref{eq:nk-dimension}. Thus $k\\asymp\\log n_k$, which proves the remaining assertions.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\begin{remark}\\label{rem:unbounded-mechanism}\nThe mechanism is genuinely nonlocal. Fractional and integral colorings must pay for sensitive edges at their endpoints. By contrast, the Beckmann boundary prescribes only the divergence and may route the resulting charge through nonsensitive edges. The quotient construction creates $k$ edge scales that add linearly in the fractional packing lower bound, while the direct Beckmann construction combines them in an $\\ell_2$ fashion. This produces the factor $\\sqrt{k}$.\n\\end{remark}\n\n\\subsection{Summary of comparisons}\\label{summary}\nFor every $f$, every fixed coloring $\\chi$, and every fixed fractional coloring $\\theta$,\n\\[\n\\begin{gathered}\n \\B(f)\\le\\Tfrac(f)\\le\\Ccol(f)\\le\\Tcol^\\chi(f),\n \\qquad \\Tfrac(f)\\le\\Ttheta(f),\\\\\n \\B(f)\\le\\E\\sqrt{h_{\\{f=1\\}}}.\n\\end{gathered}\n\\]\nThe reverse inequalities fail quantitatively. Proposition \\ref{prop:singleton} shows that fixed colorings, fixed fractional colorings and one-sided boundaries may be larger than $\\B(f)$ by $\\sqrt n$. Theorem \\ref{thm:unbounded-separation} shows that even the optimized fractional and integral colored boundaries satisfy\n\\[\n \\sup_{\\substack{f:\\Omega_{n_k}\\to\\{-1,1\\}\\\\ f\\ \\mathrm{nonconstant}}}\n \\frac{\\Tfrac(f)}{\\B(f)}\\gtrsim\\sqrt{\\log n_k},\n \\qquad\n \\sup_{\\substack{f:\\Omega_{n_k}\\to\\{-1,1\\}\\\\ f\\ \\mathrm{nonconstant}}}\n \\frac{\\Ccol(f)}{\\B(f)}\\gtrsim\\sqrt{\\log n_k}\n\\]\nalong the explicit sequence of dimensions $(n_k)$. Thus no dimension-free reverse comparison is possible, and the Beckmann--Talagrand theorem is genuinely stronger than the optimized colored-boundary inequality. As a complement to these lower bounds, Corollary \\ref{log-reverse-beckmann-fractional} proved that for every Boolean function \\(f:\\Omega_n\\to\\{-1,1\\}\\),\n\\[\n \\Tfrac(f)\\lesssim \\B(f)\\log(en),\n\\]\nand \n\\[\n\\Tfrac(f)\\asymp\\Ccol(f)\n\\]\nwas established in Proposition \\ref{prop:fractional-integral-comparable}.\n\\section{The IVHV identity and strong spectral endpoints}\\label{sec:ivhv-spectral}\n\nThe proof of Theorem \\ref{thm:beckmann-Poincar\\'e} used the derivative identity of Ivanisvili--van Handel--Volberg \\cite[Lemma~2.1]{IVHV}, which lies behind the reverse Poincar\\'e estimate, only through Cauchy--Schwarz. In this section we keep the exact kernel. This gives strong spectral moment inequalities, including the endpoint estimate \\eqref{eq:intro-strong-endpoint}.\n\nFor $t>0$, put $\\rho=e^{-t}$ and let $\\varepsilon_i(t)$ be independent random signs with\n\\[\n \\E\\varepsilon_i(t)=\\rho.\n\\]\nDefine the standardized biased Rademacher variables\n\\[\n \\delta_i(t)=\\frac{\\varepsilon_i(t)-\\rho}{\\sqrt{1-\\rho^2}}.\n\\]\nFor $a=(a_1,\\ldots,a_n)\\in\\R^n$ define the IVHV local gauge\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Psi-def}\n \\Psi_t(a)=\n \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{e^{2t}-1}}\n \\E\\left|\\sum_{i=1}^n a_i\\delta_i(t)\\right|.\n\\end{equation}\n\n\\begin{lemma}[Heat-kernel derivative identity]\\label{lem:ivhv-identity}\nFor every $g:\\Omega_n\\to\\R$, every $t>0$, every $x\\in\\Omega_n$ and every coordinate $i$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:ivhv-identity}\n D_iP_tg(x)=\n \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{e^{2t}-1}}\n \\E\\big[\\delta_i(t)g(x\\varepsilon(t))\\big].\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{lemma}\n\nThe identity is \\cite[Lemma~2.1]{IVHV}. A verification is recalled in Appendix \\ref{app:heat-kernel}.\n\nWe first state the multiplier form for driftless Bernstein functions. Thus $\\phi(0)=0$, the linear drift coefficient vanishes, and the L\\'evy--Khintchine representation \\cite[Theorem~3.2]{SchillingSongVondracek} is\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:bernstein-rep}\n \\phi(\\lambda)=\\int_0^\\infty (1-e^{-t\\lambda})\\,\\nu(\\dd t),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\nu$ is a positive measure satisfying\n\\[\n \\int_0^\\infty (1\\wedge t)\\,\\nu(\\dd t)<\\infty.\n\\]\nA general Bernstein function with $\\phi(0)=0$ may additionally contain a drift term $b\\lambda$; that term is not included in the statement below. Put\n\\[\n \\eta_\\phi(s)=\\nu([s,\\infty))\n\\]\nand define\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Gamma-phi-def}\n \\Gamma_\\phi(a)=2\\int_0^\\infty \\eta_\\phi(s)\\Psi_s(a)\\,\\dd s,\n\\end{equation}\nwith the convention that the value may be $+\\infty$.\n\n\\begin{theorem}[Driftless Beckmann multiplier inequality]\\label{thm:bernstein-multiplier}\nLet $f:\\Omega_n\\to[-1,1]$. If $\\V$ is a vector field satisfying $\\divg \\V=Lf$, then\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:bernstein-multiplier}\n \\ip{f}{\\phi(L)f}\n \\le\n \\E_x\\Gamma_\\phi(\\V(x)).\n\\end{equation}\nConsequently,\n\\[\n \\ip{f}{\\phi(L)f}\n \\le\n \\inf_{\\divg \\V=Lf}\\E_x\\Gamma_\\phi(\\V(x)).\n\\]\n\\end{theorem}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nFor $t>0$ set\n\\[\n \\operatorname{NS}_t(f)=\\ip{f}{(I-P_t)f}.\n\\]\nLet $\\V$ be admissible. As in the proof of Theorem \\ref{thm:beckmann-Poincar\\'e},\n\\[\n \\operatorname{NS}_t(f)\n =2\\int_0^t\\E_x\\sum_{i=1}^n \\V_i(x)D_iP_sf(x)\\,\\dd s.\n\\]\nUsing Lemma \\ref{lem:ivhv-identity} and $|f|\\le1$,\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n \\left|\\E_x\\sum_i \\V_i(x)D_iP_sf(x)\\right|\n &\\le\n \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{e^{2s}-1}}\n \\E_{x,\\varepsilon}\\left|\\sum_i\\V_i(x)\\delta_i(s)f(x\\varepsilon(s))\\right| \\\\\n &\\le\n \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{e^{2s}-1}}\n \\E_{x,\\varepsilon}\\left|\\sum_i\\V_i(x)\\delta_i(s)\\right| \\\\\n &=\\E_x\\Psi_s(\\V(x)).\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nTherefore\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:NS-Psi}\n \\operatorname{NS}_t(f)\n \\le\n 2\\E_x\\int_0^t\\Psi_s(\\V(x))\\,\\dd s.\n\\end{equation}\nBy the spectral theorem and \\eqref{eq:bernstein-rep},\n\\[\n \\ip{f}{\\phi(L)f}\n =\\int_0^\\infty \\operatorname{NS}_t(f)\\,\\nu(\\dd t).\n\\]\nThe integrand on the right-hand side of \\eqref{eq:NS-Psi} is nonnegative. Hence Tonelli's theorem gives\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n \\ip{f}{\\phi(L)f}\n &\\le\n 2\\E_x\\int_0^\\infty\\int_0^t\\Psi_s(\\V(x))\\,\\dd s\\,\\nu(\\dd t) \\\\\n &=\n 2\\E_x\\int_0^\\infty\\nu([s,\\infty))\\Psi_s(\\V(x))\\,\\dd s \\\\\n &=\n \\E_x\\Gamma_\\phi(\\V(x)).\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nThis proves the theorem.\n\\end{proof}\n\nWe now specialize to fractional powers. For $0<\\alpha<1$, the standard Bernstein representation \\cite[Chapter~3]{SchillingSongVondracek} gives\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:power function rep}\n \\lambda^\\alpha=c_\\alpha\\int_0^\\infty(1-e^{-t\\lambda})t^{-1-\\alpha}\\,\\dd t.\n\\end{equation}\nThus Theorem \\ref{thm:bernstein-multiplier} gives the following.\n\n\\begin{corollary}[Fractional spectral moments]\\label{cor:fractional-multiplier}\nLet $0<\\alpha<1$ and define\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Gamma-alpha-def}\n \\Gamma_\\alpha(a)=\\int_0^\\infty s^{-\\alpha}\\Psi_s(a)\\,\\dd s.\n\\end{equation}\nThen for every $f:\\Omega_n\\to[-1,1]$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:fractional-general}\n \\sum_{S\\ne\\varnothing}|S|^\\alpha\\widehat f(S)^2\n =\\ip{f}{L^\\alpha f}\n \\lesssim_\\alpha\n \\inf_{\\divg \\V=Lf}\\E\\Gamma_\\alpha(\\V(x)).\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{corollary}\n\nFor completeness, we record the exact identity behind \\eqref{eq:fractional-general}. Let $\\V$ be any field satisfying $\\divg\\V=Lf$ and put\n\\[\n c_\\alpha=\\frac{\\alpha}{\\Gamma(1-\\alpha)}.\n\\]\nUsing \\eqref{eq:power function rep} and the identity\n\\[\n \\ip{f}{(I-P_t)f}\n =2\\int_0^t\\E_x\\sum_i\\V_i(x)D_iP_sf(x)\\,\\dd s,\n\\]\nwe obtain\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n \\ip{f}{L^\\alpha f}\n &=2c_\\alpha\\int_0^\\infty\\int_0^t\n \\E_x\\sum_i\\V_i(x)D_iP_sf(x)\\,\\dd s\\,t^{-1-\\alpha}\\,\\dd t\\\\\n &=\\frac{2}{\\Gamma(1-\\alpha)}\n \\int_0^\\infty s^{-\\alpha}\n \\E_x\\sum_i\\V_i(x)D_iP_sf(x)\\,\\dd s\\\\\n &=\\frac{2}{\\Gamma(1-\\alpha)}\n \\int_0^\\infty\n \\E_{x,\\varepsilon}\n \\left[\n f(x\\varepsilon(s))\n \\sum_{i=1}^n \\V_i(x)\\delta_i(s)\n \\right]\n \\frac{s^{-\\alpha}}{\\sqrt{e^{2s}-1}}\\,\\dd s.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nHere the interchange of the $s$- and $t$-integrals is justified absolutely. Indeed, the finite Walsh expansion gives\n\\[\n D_iP_sf=\\sum_{S\\ni i}e^{-s|S|}\\widehat f(S)\\chi_S.\n\\]\nConsequently $D_iP_sf=O(1)$ as $s\\downarrow0$ and $D_iP_sf=O(e^{-s})$ as $s\\to\\infty$, with constants depending only on the fixed functions $f$ and $\\V$. Thus\n\\[\n s^{-\\alpha}\\left|\\E_x\\sum_i\\V_iD_iP_sf\\right|\n\\]\nis integrable on $(0,\\infty)$ because $0<\\alpha<1$. Taking absolute values in the exact identity and using $|f|\\le1$ recovers Corollary \\ref{cor:fractional-multiplier}.\n\nThe next elementary estimate converts the exact IVHV gauge into local boundary moments.\n\n\\begin{lemma}[Flat-vector estimate]\\label{lem:flat-vector}\nLet $u_m=(1,\\ldots,1,0,\\ldots,0)\\in\\R^n$ have $m$ nonzero coordinates. For $0<\\alpha<1$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:flat-Gamma-bound}\n \\Gamma_\\alpha(u_m)\n \\lesssim_\\alpha\n \\omega_\\alpha(m),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\omega_\\alpha(0)=0$ and, for $m\\ge1$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:omega-alpha-def}\n \\omega_\\alpha(m)=\n \\begin{cases}\n \\sqrt m, & 0<\\alpha<1/2,\\\\[3pt]\n \\sqrt m\\log(e+m), & \\alpha=1/2,\\\\[3pt]\n m^\\alpha, & 1/2<\\alpha<1.\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nThe same bound holds for every vector $a$ with at most $m$ nonzero coordinates and $|a_i|\\le1$.\n\\end{lemma}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nIt suffices to prove the estimate for such a vector $a$. If $m=0$, then $a=0$, so $\\Psi_t(a)=\\Gamma_\\alpha(a)=0$, and the assertion is immediate. Assume henceforth that $m\\ge1$.\n\nFirst suppose $0<t\\le1$. The variables $\\delta_i(t)$ are centered and have variance one. Hence Cauchy--Schwarz gives\n\\[\n \\E\\left|\\sum_i a_i\\delta_i(t)\\right|\n \\le \\left(\\sum_i a_i^2\\right)^{1/2}\n \\le \\sqrt m.\n\\]\nSince $e^{2t}-1\\asymp t$ on $(0,1]$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Psi-L2-small}\n \\Psi_t(a)\\lesssim \\sqrt{m/t}.\n\\end{equation}\nWe also need an $\\ell_1$-type bound. By the triangle inequality and $|a_i|\\le1$, it is enough to estimate $\\Psi_t(e_i)$. If $\\rho=e^{-t}$, then\n\\[\n \\E|\\delta_i(t)|=\\sqrt{1-\\rho^2},\n \\qquad\n \\Psi_t(e_i)=\\frac{\\sqrt{1-\\rho^2}}{\\sqrt{e^{2t}-1}}=\\rho\\le1.\n\\]\nTherefore\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Psi-L1-small}\n \\Psi_t(a)\\le m,\n \\qquad 0<t\\le1.\n\\end{equation}\nCombining \\eqref{eq:Psi-L2-small} and \\eqref{eq:Psi-L1-small},\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Psi-min}\n \\Psi_t(a)\n \\lesssim\n \\min\\left\\{m,\\sqrt{m/t}\\right\\},\n \\qquad 0<t\\le1.\n\\end{equation}\nFor $t\\ge1$, the prefactor in \\eqref{eq:Psi-def} is $O(e^{-t})$, while the centered sum has $L^1$ norm at most its $L^2$ norm, which is at most $\\sqrt m$. Hence\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Psi-large}\n \\Psi_t(a)\\lesssim e^{-t}\\sqrt m,\n \\qquad t\\ge1.\n\\end{equation}\nThe contribution of $t\\ge1$ to $\\Gamma_\\alpha(a)$ is therefore $O_\\alpha(\\sqrt m)$.\n\nFor $0<t\\le1$, split at $t=1/m$. By \\eqref{eq:Psi-min},\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n \\int_0^1 t^{-\\alpha}\\Psi_t(a)\\,\\dd t\n &\\lesssim\n m\\int_0^{1/m}t^{-\\alpha}\\,\\dd t\n +\\sqrt m\\int_{1/m}^1t^{-\\alpha-1/2}\\,\\dd t\\\\\n &=\\frac{m^\\alpha}{1-\\alpha}\n +\\sqrt m\\int_{1/m}^1t^{-\\alpha-1/2}\\,\\dd t.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nThe second term equals, up to a constant depending only on $\\alpha$,\n\\[\n \\begin{cases}\n \\sqrt m\\bigl(1-m^{\\alpha-1/2}\\bigr), & 0<\\alpha<1/2,\\\\\n \\sqrt m\\log m, & \\alpha=1/2,\\\\\n \\sqrt m\\bigl(m^{\\alpha-1/2}-1\\bigr), & 1/2<\\alpha<1.\n \\end{cases}\n\\]\nThus it is bounded respectively by $C_\\alpha\\sqrt m$, $\\sqrt m\\log(e+m)$, and $C_\\alpha m^\\alpha$. The first integral has size $C_\\alpha m^\\alpha$; here $m^\\alpha\\le\\sqrt m$ when $\\alpha<1/2$, while $\\sqrt m\\le m^\\alpha$ when $\\alpha>1/2$. Combining these estimates with the $t\\ge1$ contribution proves \\eqref{eq:flat-Gamma-bound} in all three regimes.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\begin{theorem}[One-sided spectral moment scale]\\label{thm:one-sided-moment-scale}\nLet $\\A\\subset\\Omega_n$ and\n\\[\n h_{\\A}(x)=\\#\\{i:x\\in\\A,\\ x^{\\oplus i}\\notin\\A\\}.\n\\]\nThen for every $0<\\alpha<1$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:one-sided-alpha}\n \\sum_{S\\ne\\varnothing}|S|^\\alpha\\widehat{\\1_{\\A}}(S)^2\n \\lesssim_\\alpha\n \\E\\omega_\\alpha(h_{\\A}(x)).\n\\end{equation}\nIn particular, at the critical endpoint $\\alpha=1/2$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:one-sided-half}\n \\sum_{S\\ne\\varnothing}\\sqrt{|S|}\\,\\widehat{\\1_{\\A}}(S)^2\n \\lesssim\n \\E\\big[\\sqrt{h_{\\A}(x)}\\log(e+h_{\\A}(x))\\big].\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{theorem}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nApply Corollary \\ref{cor:fractional-multiplier} to $g=\\1_{\\A}$. Define a vector field $\\V^+$ by\n\\[\n \\V_i^+(x)=\\frac12\\,\\1_{\\{x\\in\\A,\\ x^{\\oplus i}\\notin\\A\\}}.\n\\]\nThen $\\divg \\V^+=L\\1_{\\A}$. Indeed, on a boundary edge from $\\A$ to $\\A^c$, the difference $\\V_i^+(x)-\\V_i^+(x^{\\oplus i})$ equals $1/2$ at the point in $\\A$ and $-1/2$ at the point in $\\A^c$, exactly matching $D_i\\1_{\\A}$. On non-boundary edges both sides vanish.\n\nAt a point $x\\in\\A$, the vector $\\V^+(x)$ has $h_{\\A}(x)$ nonzero coordinates, all equal to $1/2$; at a point $x\\notin\\A$ it is zero. By homogeneity of $\\Gamma_\\alpha$ and Lemma \\ref{lem:flat-vector},\n\\[\n \\Gamma_\\alpha(\\V^+(x))\n \\lesssim_\\alpha\n \\omega_\\alpha(h_{\\A}(x)).\n\\]\nSubstituting this admissible field into \\eqref{eq:fractional-general} proves \\eqref{eq:one-sided-alpha}, and \\eqref{eq:one-sided-half} is the case $\\alpha=1/2$.\n\\end{proof}\n\nThe same argument gives a colored version.\n\n\\begin{corollary}[Colored strong spectral moments]\\label{cor:colored-moment-scale}\nLet $f:\\Omega_n\\to\\{-1,1\\}$ and color every sensitive edge red or blue. Then for every $0<\\alpha<1$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:colored-alpha}\n \\sum_{S\\ne\\varnothing}|S|^\\alpha\\widehat f(S)^2\n \\lesssim_\\alpha\n \\E\\left[\\omega_\\alpha(s_{f,{\\rm red}}(x))+\\omega_\\alpha(s_{f,{\\rm blue}}(x))\\right].\n\\end{equation}\nIn particular,\n\\begin{align*}\n \\sum_{S\\ne\\varnothing}\\sqrt{|S|}\\,\\widehat f(S)^2\n &\\lesssim\n \\E\\Big[\n \\sqrt{s_{f,{\\rm red}}(x)}\\log(e+s_{f,{\\rm red}}(x)) \\\\\n &\\hspace{3.2cm}+\n \\sqrt{s_{f,{\\rm blue}}(x)}\\log(e+s_{f,{\\rm blue}}(x))\n \\Big].\n\\end{align*}\n\\end{corollary}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nFor every sensitive edge $e=\\{x,x^{\\oplus i}\\}$, orient the notation so that $f(x)=1$ and $f(x^{\\oplus i})=-1$. Define the two endpoint values of the $i$th field component by\n\\[\n\\begin{array}{c|cc}\n &x\\text{, the }f=1\\text{ endpoint}&x^{\\oplus i}\\text{, the }f=-1\\text{ endpoint}\\\\ \\hline\n e\\text{ red}&1&0\\\\\n e\\text{ blue}&0&-1.\n\\end{array}\n\\]\nOn nonsensitive edges set both endpoint values equal to zero. In either color case,\n\\[\n \\V_i(x)-\\V_i(x^{\\oplus i})=1=D_i f(x),\n\\]\nand at the opposite endpoint the same identity holds with both sides negated. Summing over $i$ therefore gives $\\divg\\V=Lf$.\n\nIf $f(x)=1$, the nonzero coordinates of $\\V(x)$ are precisely the red sensitive edges charged at $x$, and all those entries equal $1$. If $f(x)=-1$, the nonzero coordinates are precisely the blue sensitive edges charged at $x$, and all those entries equal $-1$. Lemma \\ref{lem:flat-vector} applies to the absolute values of these vectors, and Corollary \\ref{cor:fractional-multiplier} gives \\eqref{eq:colored-alpha}.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\begin{lemma}[Uniform binomial ratio]\\label{lem:uniform-binomial-ratio}\nThere are universal constants $c,C>0$ such that for every integer $m\\ge0$ and every $0\\le j\\le m$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:uniform-binomial-ratio}\n c\\sqrt{\\frac{m+1}{(j+1)(m-j+1)}}\n \\le\n \\frac{\\binom mj^2}{\\binom{2m}{2j}}\n \\le\n C\\sqrt{\\frac{m+1}{(j+1)(m-j+1)}}.\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{lemma}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nThe exact identity\n\\[\n \\frac{\\binom mj^2}{\\binom{2m}{2j}}\n =\\frac{\\binom{2j}{j}\\binom{2(m-j)}{m-j}}{\\binom{2m}{m}}\n\\]\nfollows by expanding the three binomial coefficients into factorials. Two-sided Stirling estimates imply that there are universal constants $c_0,C_0>0$ such that, for every integer $q\\ge1$,\n\\[\n c_0\\frac{4^q}{\\sqrt q}\n \\le \\binom{2q}{q}\n \\le C_0\\frac{4^q}{\\sqrt q}.\n\\]\nAfter changing the constants, the same statement holds for all $q\\ge0$ with $\\sqrt q$ replaced by $\\sqrt{q+1}$; the case $q=0$ is immediate. Applying these bounds to $q=j$, $q=m-j$, and $q=m$, the powers of $4$ cancel and yield \\eqref{eq:uniform-binomial-ratio}, including the endpoint cases $j=0$ and $j=m$.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\begin{proposition}[Sharpness for majority]\\label{prop:majority-sharp}\nLet $n\\ge3$ be odd and let $\\A_n=\\{x\\in\\Omega_n:\\sum_i x_i>0\\}$. Then, for $0<\\alpha<1$,\n\\[\n \\sum_{S\\ne\\varnothing}|S|^\\alpha\\widehat{\\1_{\\A_n}}(S)^2\n \\asymp_\\alpha\n \\E\\omega_\\alpha(h_{\\A_n}(x)).\n\\]\nConsequently the logarithmic endpoint \\eqref{eq:one-sided-half} is sharp up to universal constants.\n\\end{proposition}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nThe boundary of $\\A_n$ is supported on the positive critical layer\n\\[\n \\#\\{i:x_i=1\\}=\\frac{n+1}{2}.\n\\]\nOn this layer,\n\\[\n h_{\\A_n}(x)=\\frac{n+1}{2},\n\\]\nand the layer has measure comparable to $n^{-1/2}$ by the standard central-binomial estimates. Hence\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:majority-boundary-scale}\n \\E\\omega_\\alpha(h_{\\A_n})\n \\asymp_\\alpha\n \\begin{cases}\n 1, & 0<\\alpha<1/2,\\\\\n \\log n, & \\alpha=1/2,\\\\\n n^{\\alpha-1/2}, & 1/2<\\alpha<1.\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\n\nIt remains to obtain a finite-dimensional lower bound for the Fourier moment. Write $n=2m+1$. Majority is odd under the global sign change $x\\mapsto-x$; since $\\chi_S(-x)=(-1)^{|S|}\\chi_S(x)$, every positive even Fourier level of majority vanishes. By permutation symmetry, all Fourier coefficients on a fixed odd level agree. For $|S|=2j+1$, the exact majority formula is \\cite[Section~5.3]{ODonnell}\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:majority-exact-coefficient}\n \\widehat{\\mathrm{Maj}_n}(S)\n =(-1)^j\n \\frac{\\binom{2m}{m}}{2^{2m}}\n \\frac{\\binom{m}{j}}{\\binom{2m}{2j}},\n \\qquad 0\\le j\\le m.\n\\end{equation}\nConsequently,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:majority-level-formula}\n\\begin{aligned}\n W_{=2j+1}[\\mathrm{Maj}_n]\n &=\\binom{2m+1}{2j+1}\n \\left(\\frac{\\binom{2m}{m}}{2^{2m}}\n \\frac{\\binom{m}{j}}{\\binom{2m}{2j}}\\right)^2\\\\\n &=\\frac{2m+1}{2j+1}\n \\left(\\frac{\\binom{2m}{m}}{2^{2m}}\\right)^2\n \\frac{\\binom{m}{j}^2}{\\binom{2m}{2j}}.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\end{equation}\nThe central-binomial estimate used in Lemma \\ref{lem:uniform-binomial-ratio} gives\n\\[\n \\left(\\frac{\\binom{2m}{m}}{2^{2m}}\\right)^2\n \\gtrsim \\frac1{m+1}.\n\\]\nCombining this with Lemma \\ref{lem:uniform-binomial-ratio} in \\eqref{eq:majority-level-formula},\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n W_{=2j+1}[\\mathrm{Maj}_n]\n &\\gtrsim\n \\frac{2m+1}{(2j+1)(m+1)}\n \\sqrt{\\frac{m+1}{(j+1)(m-j+1)}}\\\\\n &\\gtrsim\n \\frac1{(2j+1)\\sqrt{j+1}}\n \\gtrsim (2j+1)^{-3/2}.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nThus\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:majority-uniform-lower}\n W_{=k}[\\mathrm{Maj}_n]\\gtrsim k^{-3/2}\n \\qquad\\text{for every odd }1\\le k\\le n.\n\\end{equation}\nSince $\\1_{\\A_n}=(1+\\mathrm{Maj}_n)/2$, its nonconstant level weights are one quarter of those of $\\mathrm{Maj}_n$. Summing \\eqref{eq:majority-uniform-lower} over odd $k\\le n/2$ yields\n\\[\n \\sum_{S\\ne\\varnothing}|S|^\\alpha\n \\widehat{\\1_{\\A_n}}(S)^2\n \\gtrsim_\\alpha\n \\begin{cases}\n 1, & 0<\\alpha<1/2,\\\\\n \\log n, & \\alpha=1/2,\\\\\n n^{\\alpha-1/2}, & 1/2<\\alpha<1.\n \\end{cases}\n\\]\nThe reverse inequality follows directly from Theorem \\ref{thm:one-sided-moment-scale} and \\eqref{eq:majority-boundary-scale}. This proves the proposition.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\begin{remark}[Relation to Majority Is Stablest]\\label{rem:majority-is-stablest}\nFor a balanced function $g:\\Omega_n\\to\\{-1,1\\}$, write\n\\[\n \\Stab_\\rho(g)=\\sum_{S\\subseteq[n]}\\rho^{|S|}\\widehat g(S)^2.\n\\]\nBy \\eqref{eq:power function rep}, after the change of variables $\\rho=e^{-t}$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:fractional-stability-integral}\n \\sum_{S\\ne\\varnothing}|S|^\\alpha\\widehat g(S)^2\n =c_\\alpha\\int_0^1\n \\frac{1-\\Stab_\\rho(g)}{\\rho(-\\log\\rho)^{1+\\alpha}}\\,\\dd\\rho,\n \\qquad\n c_\\alpha=\\frac{\\alpha}{\\Gamma(1-\\alpha)}.\n\\end{equation}\nMajority Is Stablest \\cite[Theorem~4.4]{MOO} says that, for every fixed\n$0<\\rho<1$, balanced Boolean functions with vanishing maximal influence have\nnoise stability at most\n\\[\n \\frac{2}{\\pi}\\arcsin\\rho+o(1),\n\\]\nthe limiting stability of majority. Since\n\\[\n 1-\\frac{2}{\\pi}\\arcsin\\rho\\asymp\\sqrt{1-\\rho}\n \\qquad(\\rho\\uparrow1),\n\\]\nthe Gaussian expression obtained by inserting this bound into\n\\eqref{eq:fractional-stability-integral} is finite exactly when\n$\\alpha<1/2$. Thus, after truncating the integral away from $\\rho=1$ and\npassing to the low-influence limit, Majority Is Stablest explains the\nconstant-order obstruction, and hence the $\\sqrt m$ branch of\n$\\omega_\\alpha$, for $\\alpha<1/2$. At and above the critical exponent it\ndetects divergence, but the usual fixed-$\\rho$ theorem does not by itself\nsupply the sharp finite-dimensional rates $\\log n$ and\n$n^{\\alpha-1/2}$; those require control down to the scale\n$1-\\rho\\asymp n^{-1}$, as in Proposition \\ref{prop:majority-sharp}.\n\\end{remark}\n\n\n\\section{Relation to random restrictions}\\label{sec:random-restrictions}\n\nThe proof of Eldan--Kindler--Lifshitz--Minzer \\cite[Sections~2.2 and~3.4]{EKLM} is based on random restrictions. Their method first proves a level-one estimate for a boundary functional and then shows that random restrictions turn high-degree Fourier mass into level-one Fourier mass. For edge-local quantities, the boundary of a restriction is obtained by deleting frozen coordinates, and this gives the required contraction.\n\nFor the Beckmann boundary, the level-one estimate is immediate. If $\\divg \\V=Lf$, then, for every $i$,\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n \\widehat f(\\{i\\})\n &=\\ip{f}{\\chi_i}\n =\\ip{Lf}{\\chi_i}\n =\\ip{\\divg \\V}{\\chi_i} \\\\\n &=2\\sum_{j=1}^n\\ip{\\V_j}{D_j\\chi_i}\n =2\\ip{\\V_i}{\\chi_i}.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nHere we used $L\\chi_i=\\chi_i$ and $D_j\\chi_i=\\1_{\\{i=j\\}}\\chi_i$. Therefore, by the vector-valued Jensen inequality,\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n \\sqrt{W_{=1}[f]}\n &=2\\left\\|\\E_x\\big(\\V_i(x)\\chi_i(x)\\big)_{i=1}^n\\right\\|_2\\\\\n &\\le2\\E_x\\left\\|\\big(\\V_i(x)\\chi_i(x)\\big)_{i=1}^n\\right\\|_2\n =2\\E\\|\\V(x)\\|_2.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nTaking the infimum over all admissible fields gives\n\\[\n \\B(f)\\ge\\frac12\\sqrt{W_{=1}[f]}.\n\\]\n\nThe missing random-restriction step would be a Hodge-type contraction estimate of the form\n\\[\n \\E_R\\B(f_R)\\lesssim \\sqrt p\\,\\B(f).\n\\]\nHere $R=(J,z)$ is sampled as follows. Each coordinate is retained in $J\\subseteq[n]$ independently with probability $p$, and, conditionally on $J$, the vector $z\\in\\{-1,1\\}^{[n]\\setminus J}$ is uniform and independent. The restricted function $f_R$ is the Boolean function on $\\Omega_J=\\{-1,1\\}^J$ obtained by setting the coordinates outside $J$ equal to $z$, and $\\E_R$ denotes expectation over both $J$ and $z$.\n\nUnlike the corresponding estimate for edge-local colored boundaries, the displayed contraction does not follow by deleting coordinates from an optimal field. Indeed, if $\\V$ satisfies $\\divg \\V=Lf$ and one restricts to a slice, then the divergence of the components in the alive directions equals the restricted alive-coordinate Laplacian only after subtracting the divergence contributed by the frozen directions. That latter term is generally nonzero and becomes an additional source on the slice. Thus the alive part of $\\V$ need not be feasible for $f_R$. The semigroup proof avoids this obstruction: it tests the full divergence equation directly against $P_s f$ and never restricts the vector field.\n\nThis is the sense in which Theorem \\ref{thm:main} strengthens the robust theorem of Eldan--Kindler--Lifshitz--Minzer by a semigroup method. Their colored boundary is edge-local; the Beckmann boundary is nonlocal and smaller, yet it satisfies the same Talagrand-type lower bound.\n\n\\appendix\n\n\\section{Standard analytic and duality ingredients}\\label{app:standard}\n\n\\subsection{Heat-kernel identities and reverse Poincar\\'e}\\label{app:heat-kernel}\n\n\\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma \\ref{lem:ivhv-identity}]\nWrite $\\rho=e^{-t}$ and fix $x$. In the noise representation\n\\[\n P_tg(x)=\\E_\\varepsilon g(x\\varepsilon),\n\\]\nthe coordinates of $\\varepsilon$ are independent and satisfy\n\\[\n \\Pr[\\varepsilon_i=1]=\\frac{1+\\rho}{2},\n \\qquad\n \\Pr[\\varepsilon_i=-1]=\\frac{1-\\rho}{2}.\n\\]\nFix all noise variables except $\\varepsilon_i$, and abbreviate\n\\[\n a=g(x_1\\varepsilon_1,\\ldots,x_i,\\ldots,x_n\\varepsilon_n),\n \\qquad\n b=g(x_1\\varepsilon_1,\\ldots,-x_i,\\ldots,x_n\\varepsilon_n).\n\\]\nConditioning on $\\varepsilon_{\\ne i}$ gives\n\\[\n P_tg(x)-P_tg(x^{\\oplus i})\n =\\rho\\,\\E_{\\varepsilon_{\\ne i}}(a-b),\n\\]\nand hence\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:appendix-DPt-first}\n D_iP_tg(x)=\\frac\\rho2\\E_{\\varepsilon_{\\ne i}}(a-b).\n\\end{equation}\nOn the other hand, a direct two-point computation gives\n\\[\n \\E_{\\varepsilon_i}\\big[g(x\\varepsilon)(\\varepsilon_i-\\rho)\\big]\n =\\frac{1-\\rho^2}{2}(a-b).\n\\]\nSince $\\delta_i(t)=(\\varepsilon_i-\\rho)/\\sqrt{1-\\rho^2}$,\n\\[\n \\E_\\varepsilon[\\delta_i(t)g(x\\varepsilon)]\n =\\frac{\\sqrt{1-\\rho^2}}2\n \\E_{\\varepsilon_{\\ne i}}(a-b).\n\\]\nCombining this with \\eqref{eq:appendix-DPt-first} and using\n\\[\n \\frac\\rho{\\sqrt{1-\\rho^2}}\n =\\frac1{\\sqrt{e^{2t}-1}}\n\\]\nproves \\eqref{eq:ivhv-identity}.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\nWe next give a proof of Lemma \\ref{lem:reverse-Poincar\\'e}. Another semigroup proof can be found in \\cite[Section 6]{ILvHV}.\n\n\n\n\n\\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma \\ref{lem:reverse-Poincar\\'e}]\nWrite $\\rho=e^{-t}$ and use the same noise representation as above. Fix $x$ and set\n\\[\n G(\\varepsilon)=g(x\\varepsilon),\n \\qquad\n \\delta_i=\\frac{\\varepsilon_i-\\rho}{\\sqrt{1-\\rho^2}}.\n\\]\nThe variables $\\delta_1,\\ldots,\\delta_n$ are orthonormal in the noise\n$L^2$ space and are all orthogonal to constants. The calculation in the proof of Lemma \\ref{lem:ivhv-identity} gives\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:coef-id}\n D_iP_tg(x)=\\frac\\rho{\\sqrt{1-\\rho^2}}\\E[G\\delta_i].\n\\end{equation}\nBecause $\\E\\delta_i=0$,\n\\[\n \\E[G\\delta_i]=\\E[(G-\\E G)\\delta_i].\n\\]\nApplying Bessel's inequality to $G-\\E G$ and the orthonormal system\n$\\delta_1,\\ldots,\\delta_n$ therefore gives\n\\[\n \\sum_{i=1}^n(\\E[G\\delta_i])^2\n \\le\\E[(G-\\E G)^2]\n =P_t(g^2)(x)-(P_tg(x))^2.\n\\]\nUsing \\eqref{eq:coef-id} and\n$\\rho^2/(1-\\rho^2)=1/(e^{2t}-1)$ proves\n\\eqref{eq:reverse-Poincar\\'e}. The $L^\\infty$ consequence follows as in the first proof.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\\subsection{Finite-dimensional Beckmann duality}\\label{app:duality}\n\n\\begin{proof}[Proof of Proposition \\ref{prop:dual}]\nLet $X$ be the finite-dimensional space of vector fields on $\\Omega_n$, equipped with\n\\[\n \\ip{\\V}{W}_X=\\E\\sum_{i=1}^n\\V_i(x)W_i(x),\n\\]\nand let $Y$ be the space of real-valued functions on $\\Omega_n$, equipped with\n$\\ip{g}{h}_Y=\\E[gh]$. Let $A:X\\to Y$ be the divergence map. For every\n$\\V\\in X$ and $\\phi\\in Y$, changing variables $x\\mapsto x^{\\oplus i}$ gives\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n \\ip{A\\V}{\\phi}_Y\n &=\\sum_{i=1}^n\\E[(\\V_i(x)-\\V_i(x^{\\oplus i}))\\phi(x)]\\\\\n &=\\sum_{i=1}^n\\E[\\V_i(x)(\\phi(x)-\\phi(x^{\\oplus i}))]\\\\\n &=2\\E\\sum_{i=1}^n\\V_i(x)D_i\\phi(x).\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nThus the adjoint of $A$ is\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:divergence-adjoint}\n A^*\\phi=2D\\phi.\n\\end{equation}\n\nDefine\n\\[\n J(\\V)=\\E\\|\\V(x)\\|_2.\n\\]\nThe primal problem is\n\\[\n \\inf\\{J(\\V):A\\V=Lf\\}.\n\\]\nThe functional $J$ is finite and continuous on all of the finite-dimensional\nspace $X$, and the affine constraint is feasible; for example,\n$\\V_i=f/2$ satisfies $A\\V=Lf$. This is the standard continuity qualification in the finite-dimensional Fenchel--Rockafellar theorem~\\cite[Theorem~31.2]{Rockafellar}, so there is no duality gap.\n\nFor completeness, introduce a multiplier $\\phi\\in Y$ and form the Lagrangian\n\\[\n J(\\V)+\\ip{\\phi}{Lf-A\\V}_Y.\n\\]\nUsing \\eqref{eq:divergence-adjoint}, the infimum over $\\V$ separates over vertices. At a fixed $x$ it is, up to the common positive factor $2^{-n}$,\n\\[\n \\inf_{v\\in\\R^n}\\big\\{\\|v\\|_2-2v\\cdot D\\phi(x)\\big\\}.\n\\]\nBy the duality between the Euclidean norm and itself, this infimum is $0$ if\n$2\\|D\\phi(x)\\|_2\\le1$ and is $-\\infty$ otherwise. Hence the dual problem is\n\\[\n \\sup\\left\\{\n \\E[\\phi Lf]:2\\|D\\phi(x)\\|_2\\le1\n \\text{ for every }x\\in\\Omega_n\n \\right\\}.\n\\]\nStrong duality identifies this supremum with the primal value $\\B(f)$, proving\n\\eqref{eq:dual}.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\begin{thebibliography}{21}\n\n\\bibitem{Beckmann}\nM. Beckmann,\nA continuous model of transportation,\n\\emph{Econometrica} 20 (1952), no. 4, 643--660.\n\n\\bibitem{Beckner}\nW. Beckner,\nInequalities in Fourier analysis,\n\\emph{Ann. of Math. (2)} 102 (1975), no. 1, 159--182.\n\n\\bibitem{BIM}\nD. Beltran, P. Ivanisvili, and J. Madrid,\nOn sharp isoperimetric inequalities on the hypercube,\narXiv:2303.06738, 2023.\n\n\\bibitem{BenEfraimLustPiquard}\nL. Ben Efraim and F. Lust-Piquard,\nPoincaré type inequalities on the discrete cube and in the CAR algebra,\n\\emph{Probab. Theory Related Fields} 141 (2008), no. 3--4, 569--602.\n\n\\bibitem{Bonami}\nA. Bonami,\nÉtude des coefficients de Fourier des fonctions de \\(L^p(G)\\),\n\\emph{Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)} 20 (1970), no. 2, 335--402.\n\n\\bibitem{CorderoEskenazis}\nD. Cordero-Erausquin and A. Eskenazis,\nTalagrand's influence inequality revisited,\n\\emph{Anal. PDE} 16 (2023), no. 2, 571--612.\n\n\\bibitem{EldanGross}\nR. Eldan and R. Gross,\nConcentration on the Boolean hypercube via pathwise stochastic analysis,\n\\emph{Invent. Math.} 230 (2022), no. 3, 935--994.\n\n\\bibitem{EKLM}\nR. Eldan, G. Kindler, N. Lifshitz, and D. Minzer,\nIsoperimetric inequalities made simpler,\n\\emph{Discrete Anal.} 2025, Paper No. 7, 23 pp.; arXiv:2204.06686.\n\n\\bibitem{ILvHV}\nP. Ivanisvili, D. Li, R. van Handel, and A. Volberg,\nImproving constant in end-point Poincaré inequality on Hamming cube,\narXiv:1811.05584, 2018.\n\n\\bibitem{IVHV}\nP. Ivanisvili, R. van Handel, and A. Volberg,\nRademacher type and Enflo type coincide,\n\\emph{Ann. of Math. (2)} 192 (2020), no. 2, 665--678.\n\n\\bibitem{IvanisviliZhang}\nP. Ivanisvili and H. Zhang,\nOn the Eldan--Gross inequality,\n\\emph{J. Funct. Anal.} 290 (2026), no. 4, Paper No. 111255.\n\n\n\\bibitem{KKL}\nJ. Kahn, G. Kalai, and N. Linial,\nThe influence of variables on Boolean functions,\nin \\emph{Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science}\n(FOCS 1988), 68--80.\n\n\\bibitem{KellerKindler}\nN. Keller and G. Kindler,\nQuantitative relation between noise sensitivity and influences,\n\\emph{Combinatorica} 33 (2013), no. 1, 45--71.\n\n\\bibitem{MOO}\nE. Mossel, R. O'Donnell, and K. Oleszkiewicz,\nNoise stability of functions with low influences: invariance and optimality,\n\\emph{Ann. of Math. (2)} 171 (2010), no. 1, 295--341.\n\n\\bibitem{ODonnell}\nR. O'Donnell,\n\\emph{Analysis of Boolean Functions},\nCambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014.\n\n\\bibitem{Rockafellar}\nR. T. Rockafellar,\n\\emph{Convex Analysis},\nPrinceton Mathematical Series, vol. 28,\nPrinceton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970.\n\n\\bibitem{RosenthalVanHandel}\nG. Rosenthal,\nRamon van Handel's Remarks on the Discrete Cube,\nlecture notes, 2020.\nAvailable at \\url{https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~rosenthal/RvH_discrete_cube.pdf}.\n\n\\bibitem{SchillingSongVondracek}\nR. L. Schilling, R. Song, and Z. Vondraček,\n\\emph{Bernstein Functions: Theory and Applications},\n2nd ed., De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, vol. 37,\nWalter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2012.\n\n\\bibitem{Talagrand1993}\nM. Talagrand,\nIsoperimetry, logarithmic Sobolev inequalities on the discrete cube, and\nMargulis' graph connectivity theorem,\n\\emph{Geom. Funct. Anal.} 3 (1993), no. 3, 295--314.\n\n\\bibitem{Talagrand1994}\nM. Talagrand,\nOn Russo's approximate zero-one law,\n\\emph{Ann. Probab.} 22 (1994), no. 3, 1576--1587.\n\n\\bibitem{Talagrand1997}\nM. Talagrand,\nOn boundaries and influences,\n\\emph{Combinatorica} 17 (1997), no. 2, 275--285.\n\n\\end{thebibliography}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091162,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31962"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31962"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Ziqi Ye"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Ziqi Ye, Yinghui He, Weiwei Chen, Guanding Yu, Rui Zhang"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Toward Efficient Sensing in Multi-Device ISCC by Removing Frequency Domain Redundancy"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"6 pages, 9 figures"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"eess.SP"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Integrated sensing, communication, and computation (ISCC) is envisioned as a key enabler for intelligent services in future wireless networks. However, in multi-device ISCC systems, directly offloading full orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) sensing data to the edge may incur excessive overhead, thereby limiting sensing performance under practical resource constraints. In this paper, we propose a subcarrier selection-based sensing framework for multi-device ISCC systems, where frequency-domain redundancy in OFDM sensing data is removed during local preprocessing to reduce sensing data transmission and processing overhead. Based on the proposed framework, we establish analytical models for sensing accuracy, delay, and energy consumption, and formulate a sensing accuracy maximization problem under practical resource constraints. To solve this problem, we develop an alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM)-based algorithm. Experiments on commodity wireless devices validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework and show that it consistently outperforms three baseline schemes under various resource constraints."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:02:32 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:02:32 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Ye","Ziqi",""],["He","Yinghui",""],["Chen","Weiwei",""],["Yu","Guanding",""],["Zhang","Rui",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Ye\",\n \"Ziqi\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"He\",\n \"Yinghui\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Chen\",\n \"Weiwei\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Yu\",\n \"Guanding\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Zhang\",\n \"Rui\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: IEEEtran.cls\n================================================\n%%\n%% IEEEtran.cls 2015/08/26 version V1.8b\n%% \n%% This is the IEEEtran LaTeX class for authors of the Institute of \n%% Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Transactions journals and\n%% conferences.\n%% \n%% Support sites:\n%% http://www.michaelshell.org/tex/ieeetran/\n%% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/ieeetran\n%% and\n%% http://www.ieee.org/\n%%\n%% Based on the original 1993 IEEEtran.cls, but with many bug fixes\n%% and enhancements (from both JVH and MDS) over the 1996/7 version.\n%%\n%%\n%% Contributors:\n%% Gerry Murray (1993), Silvano Balemi (1993),\n%% Jon Dixon (1996), Peter N\"uchter (1996),\n%% Juergen von Hagen (2000), and Michael Shell (2001-2014)\n%% \n%% \n%% Copyright (c) 1993-2000 by Gerry Murray, Silvano Balemi, \n%% Jon Dixon, Peter N\"uchter,\n%% Juergen von Hagen\n%% and\n%% Copyright (c) 2001-2015 by Michael Shell\n%%\n%% Current maintainer (V1.3 to V1.8b): Michael Shell\n%% See:\n%% http://www.michaelshell.org/\n%% for current contact information.\n%%\n%% Special thanks to Peter Wilson (CUA) and Donald Arseneau\n%% for allowing the inclusion of the \\@ifmtarg command \n%% from their ifmtarg LaTeX package. \n%% \n%%*************************************************************************\n%% Legal Notice:\n%% This code is offered as-is without any warranty either expressed or\n%% implied; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or\n%% FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE! \n%% User assumes all risk.\n%% In no event shall the IEEE or any contributor to this code be liable for\n%% any damages or losses, including, but not limited to, incidental,\n%% consequential, or any other damages, resulting from the use or misuse\n%% of any information contained here.\n%%\n%% All comments are the opinions of their respective authors and are not\n%% necessarily endorsed by the IEEE.\n%%\n%% This work is distributed under the LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL)\n%% ( http://www.latex-project.org/ ) version 1.3, and may be freely used,\n%% distributed and modified. A copy of the LPPL, version 1.3, is included\n%% in the base LaTeX documentation of all distributions of LaTeX released\n%% 2003/12/01 or later.\n%% Retain all contribution notices and credits.\n%% ** Modified files should be clearly indicated as such, including **\n%% ** renaming them and changing author support contact information. **\n%%\n%% File list of work: IEEEtran.cls, IEEEtran_HOWTO.pdf, bare_adv.tex,\n%% bare_conf.tex, bare_jrnl.tex, bare_conf_compsoc.tex,\n%% bare_jrnl_compsoc.tex\n%% \n%% Major changes to the user interface should be indicated by an \n%% increase in the version numbers. If a version is a beta, it will \n%% be indicated with a BETA suffix, i.e., 1.4 BETA.\n%% Small changes can be indicated by appending letters to the version\n%% such as \"IEEEtran_v14a.cls\".\n%% In all cases, \\Providesclass, any \\typeout messages to the user,\n%% \\IEEEtransversionmajor and \\IEEEtransversionminor must reflect the\n%% correct version information.\n%% The changes should also be documented via source comments.\n%%*************************************************************************\n%%\n%\n% Available class options \n% e.g., \\documentclass[10pt,conference]{IEEEtran} \n% \n% *** choose only one from each category ***\n%\n% 9pt, 10pt, 11pt, 12pt\n% Sets normal font size. The default is 10pt.\n% \n% conference, journal, technote, peerreview, peerreviewca\n% determines format mode - conference papers, journal papers,\n% correspondence papers (technotes), or peer review papers. The user\n% should also select 9pt when using technote. peerreview is like\n% journal mode, but provides for a single-column \"cover\" title page for\n% anonymous peer review. The paper title (without the author names) is\n% repeated at the top of the page after the cover page. For peer review\n% papers, the \\IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle command must be executed (will\n% automatically be ignored for non-peerreview modes) at the place the\n% cover page is to end, usually just after the abstract (keywords are\n% not normally used with peer review papers). peerreviewca is like\n% peerreview, but allows the author names to be entered and formatted\n% as with conference mode so that author affiliation and contact\n% information can be easily seen on the cover page.\n% The default is journal.\n%\n% draft, draftcls, draftclsnofoot, final\n% determines if paper is formatted as a widely spaced draft (for\n% handwritten editor comments) or as a properly typeset final version.\n% draftcls restricts draft mode to the class file while all other LaTeX\n% packages (i.e., \\usepackage{graphicx}) will behave as final - allows\n% for a draft paper with visible figures, etc. draftclsnofoot is like\n% draftcls, but does not display the date and the word \"DRAFT\" at the foot\n% of the pages. If using one of the draft modes, the user will probably\n% also want to select onecolumn.\n% The default is final.\n%\n% letterpaper, a4paper, cspaper\n% determines paper size: 8.5in X 11in, 210mm X 297mm or 7.875in X 10.75in.\n% Changing the paper size in the standard journal and conference modes\n% will not alter the typesetting of the document - only the margins will\n% be affected. In particular, documents using the a4paper option will\n% have reduced side margins (A4 is narrower than US letter) and a longer\n% bottom margin (A4 is longer than US letter). For both cases, the top\n% margins will be the same and the text will be horizontally centered.\n% For the compsoc conference and draft modes, it is the margins that will\n% remain constant, and thus the text area size will vary, with changes in\n% the paper size.\n% The cspaper option is the special ``trim'' paper size (7.875in x 10.75in)\n% used in the actual publication of Computer Society journals. Under\n% compsoc journal mode, this option does not alter the typesetting of the\n% document. Authors should invoke the cspaper option only if requested to\n% do so by the editors of the specific journal they are submitting to.\n% For final submission to the IEEE, authors should generally use US letter \n% (8.5 X 11in) paper unless otherwise instructed. Note that authors should\n% ensure that all post-processing (ps, pdf, etc.) uses the same paper\n% specificiation as the .tex document. Problems here are by far the number\n% one reason for incorrect margins. IEEEtran will automatically set the\n% default paper size under pdflatex (without requiring any change to\n% pdftex.cfg), so this issue is more important to dvips users. Fix\n% config.ps, config.pdf, or ~/.dvipsrc for dvips, or use the\n% dvips -t papersize option instead as needed. For the cspaper option,\n% the corresponding dvips paper name is \"ieeecs\".\n% See the testflow documentation\n% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/IEEEtran/testflow\n% for more details on dvips paper size configuration.\n% The default is letterpaper.\n%\n% oneside, twoside\n% determines if layout follows single sided or two sided (duplex)\n% printing. The only notable change is with the headings at the top of\n% the pages.\n% The default is oneside.\n%\n% onecolumn, twocolumn\n% determines if text is organized into one or two columns per page. One\n% column mode is usually used only with draft papers.\n% The default is twocolumn.\n%\n% comsoc, compsoc, transmag\n% Use the format of the IEEE Communications Society, IEEE Computer Society\n% or IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, respectively.\n%\n% romanappendices\n% Use the \"Appendix I\" convention when numbering appendices. IEEEtran.cls\n% now defaults to Alpha \"Appendix A\" convention - the opposite of what\n% v1.6b and earlier did.\n%\n% captionsoff\n% disables the display of the figure/table captions. Some IEEE journals\n% request that captions be removed and figures/tables be put on pages\n% of their own at the end of an initial paper submission. The endfloat\n% package can be used with this class option to achieve this format.\n%\n% nofonttune\n% turns off tuning of the font interword spacing. Maybe useful to those\n% not using the standard Times fonts or for those who have already \"tuned\"\n% their fonts.\n% The default is to enable IEEEtran to tune font parameters.\n%\n%\n%----------\n% Available CLASSINPUTs provided (all are macros unless otherwise noted):\n% \\CLASSINPUTbaselinestretch\n% \\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin\n% \\CLASSINPUToutersidemargin\n% \\CLASSINPUTtoptextmargin\n% \\CLASSINPUTbottomtextmargin\n%\n% Available CLASSINFOs provided:\n% \\ifCLASSINFOpdf (TeX if conditional)\n% \\CLASSINFOpaperwidth (macro)\n% \\CLASSINFOpaperheight (macro)\n% \\CLASSINFOnormalsizebaselineskip (length)\n% \\CLASSINFOnormalsizeunitybaselineskip (length)\n%\n% Available CLASSOPTIONs provided:\n% all class option flags (TeX if conditionals) unless otherwise noted,\n% e.g., \\ifCLASSOPTIONcaptionsoff\n% point size options provided as a single macro:\n% \\CLASSOPTIONpt\n% which will be defined as 9, 10, 11, or 12 depending on the document's\n% normalsize point size.\n% also, class option peerreviewca implies the use of class option peerreview\n% and classoption draft implies the use of class option draftcls\n\n\n\n\n\n\\ProvidesClass{IEEEtran}[2015/08/26 V1.8b by Michael Shell]\n\\typeout{-- See the \"IEEEtran_HOWTO\" manual for usage information.}\n\\typeout{-- http://www.michaelshell.org/tex/ieeetran/}\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\n% IEEEtran.cls version numbers, provided as of V1.3\n% These values serve as a way a .tex file can\n% determine if the new features are provided.\n% The version number of this IEEEtrans.cls can be obtained from \n% these values. i.e., V1.4\n% KEEP THESE AS INTEGERS! i.e., NO {4a} or anything like that-\n% (no need to enumerate \"a\" minor changes here)\n\\def\\IEEEtransversionmajor{1}\n\\def\\IEEEtransversionminor{8}\n\n\n% hook to allow easy changeover to IEEEtran.cls/tools.sty error reporting\n\\def\\@IEEEclspkgerror{\\ClassError{IEEEtran}}\n\n\n% These do nothing, but provide them like in article.cls\n\\newif\\if@restonecol\n\\newif\\if@titlepage\n\n\n% class option conditionals\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONonecolumn \\CLASSOPTIONonecolumnfalse\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONtwocolumn \\CLASSOPTIONtwocolumntrue\n\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONoneside \\CLASSOPTIONonesidetrue\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONtwoside \\CLASSOPTIONtwosidefalse\n\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONfinal \\CLASSOPTIONfinaltrue\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraft \\CLASSOPTIONdraftfalse\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls \\CLASSOPTIONdraftclsfalse\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofoot \\CLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofootfalse\n\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview \\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewfalse\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreviewca \\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewcafalse\n\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONjournal \\CLASSOPTIONjournaltrue\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference \\CLASSOPTIONconferencefalse\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote \\CLASSOPTIONtechnotefalse\n\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONnofonttune \\CLASSOPTIONnofonttunefalse\n\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONcaptionsoff \\CLASSOPTIONcaptionsofffalse\n\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONcomsoc \\CLASSOPTIONcomsocfalse\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc \\CLASSOPTIONcompsocfalse\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag \\CLASSOPTIONtransmagfalse\n\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONromanappendices \\CLASSOPTIONromanappendicesfalse\n\n\n% class info conditionals\n\n% indicates if pdf (via pdflatex) output\n\\newif\\ifCLASSINFOpdf \\CLASSINFOpdffalse\n\n\n% V1.6b internal flag to show if using a4paper\n\\newif\\if@IEEEusingAfourpaper \\@IEEEusingAfourpaperfalse\n% V1.6b internal flag to show if using cspaper\n\\newif\\if@IEEEusingcspaper \\@IEEEusingcspaperfalse\n\n\n% IEEEtran class scratch pad registers\n% dimen\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n% count\n\\newcount\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA\n\\newcount\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB\n\\newcount\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC\n% token list\n\\newtoks\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA\n\n% we use \\CLASSOPTIONpt so that we can ID the point size (even for 9pt docs)\n% as well as LaTeX's \\@ptsize to retain some compatability with some\n% external packages\n\\def\\@ptsize{0}\n% LaTeX does not support 9pt, so we set \\@ptsize to 0 - same as that of 10pt\n\\DeclareOption{9pt}{\\def\\CLASSOPTIONpt{9}\\def\\@ptsize{0}}\n\\DeclareOption{10pt}{\\def\\CLASSOPTIONpt{10}\\def\\@ptsize{0}}\n\\DeclareOption{11pt}{\\def\\CLASSOPTIONpt{11}\\def\\@ptsize{1}}\n\\DeclareOption{12pt}{\\def\\CLASSOPTIONpt{12}\\def\\@ptsize{2}}\n\n\n\n\\DeclareOption{letterpaper}{\\setlength{\\paperwidth}{8.5in}%\n \\setlength{\\paperheight}{11in}%\n \\@IEEEusingAfourpaperfalse\n \\@IEEEusingcspaperfalse\n \\def\\CLASSOPTIONpaper{letter}%\n \\def\\CLASSINFOpaperwidth{8.5in}%\n \\def\\CLASSINFOpaperheight{11in}}\n\n\n\\DeclareOption{a4paper}{\\setlength{\\paperwidth}{210mm}%\n \\setlength{\\paperheight}{297mm}%\n \\@IEEEusingAfourpapertrue\n \\@IEEEusingcspaperfalse\n \\def\\CLASSOPTIONpaper{a4}%\n \\def\\CLASSINFOpaperwidth{210mm}%\n \\def\\CLASSINFOpaperheight{297mm}}\n\n% special paper option for compsoc journals\n\\DeclareOption{cspaper}{\\setlength{\\paperwidth}{7.875in}%\n \\setlength{\\paperheight}{10.75in}%\n \\@IEEEusingcspapertrue\n \\@IEEEusingAfourpaperfalse\n \\def\\CLASSOPTIONpaper{ieeecs}%\n \\def\\CLASSINFOpaperwidth{7.875in}%\n \\def\\CLASSINFOpaperheight{10.75in}}\n\n\\DeclareOption{oneside}{\\@twosidefalse\\@mparswitchfalse\n \\CLASSOPTIONonesidetrue\\CLASSOPTIONtwosidefalse}\n\\DeclareOption{twoside}{\\@twosidetrue\\@mparswitchtrue\n \\CLASSOPTIONtwosidetrue\\CLASSOPTIONonesidefalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{onecolumn}{\\CLASSOPTIONonecolumntrue\\CLASSOPTIONtwocolumnfalse}\n\\DeclareOption{twocolumn}{\\CLASSOPTIONtwocolumntrue\\CLASSOPTIONonecolumnfalse}\n\n% If the user selects draft, then this class AND any packages\n% will go into draft mode.\n\\DeclareOption{draft}{\\CLASSOPTIONdrafttrue\\CLASSOPTIONdraftclstrue\n \\CLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofootfalse} \n% draftcls is for a draft mode which will not affect any packages\n% used by the document.\n\\DeclareOption{draftcls}{\\CLASSOPTIONdraftfalse\\CLASSOPTIONdraftclstrue\n \\CLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofootfalse} \n% draftclsnofoot is like draftcls, but without the footer.\n\\DeclareOption{draftclsnofoot}{\\CLASSOPTIONdraftfalse\\CLASSOPTIONdraftclstrue\n \\CLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofoottrue} \n\\DeclareOption{final}{\\CLASSOPTIONdraftfalse\\CLASSOPTIONdraftclsfalse\n \\CLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofootfalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{journal}{\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewfalse\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewcafalse\n \\CLASSOPTIONjournaltrue\\CLASSOPTIONconferencefalse\\CLASSOPTIONtechnotefalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{conference}{\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewfalse\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewcafalse\n \\CLASSOPTIONjournalfalse\\CLASSOPTIONconferencetrue\\CLASSOPTIONtechnotefalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{technote}{\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewfalse\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewcafalse\n \\CLASSOPTIONjournalfalse\\CLASSOPTIONconferencefalse\\CLASSOPTIONtechnotetrue}\n\n\\DeclareOption{peerreview}{\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewtrue\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewcafalse\n \\CLASSOPTIONjournalfalse\\CLASSOPTIONconferencefalse\\CLASSOPTIONtechnotefalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{peerreviewca}{\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewtrue\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewcatrue\n \\CLASSOPTIONjournalfalse\\CLASSOPTIONconferencefalse\\CLASSOPTIONtechnotefalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{nofonttune}{\\CLASSOPTIONnofonttunetrue}\n\n\\DeclareOption{captionsoff}{\\CLASSOPTIONcaptionsofftrue}\n\n\\DeclareOption{comsoc}{\\CLASSOPTIONcomsoctrue\\CLASSOPTIONcompsocfalse\\CLASSOPTIONtransmagfalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{compsoc}{\\CLASSOPTIONcomsocfalse\\CLASSOPTIONcompsoctrue\\CLASSOPTIONtransmagfalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{transmag}{\\CLASSOPTIONtransmagtrue\\CLASSOPTIONcomsocfalse\\CLASSOPTIONcompsocfalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{romanappendices}{\\CLASSOPTIONromanappendicestrue}\n\n\n% default to US letter paper, 10pt, twocolumn, one sided, final, journal\n\\ExecuteOptions{letterpaper,10pt,twocolumn,oneside,final,journal}\n% overrride these defaults per user requests\n\\ProcessOptions\n\n\n\n%% -- Command Argument Scanning Support Functions --\n\n% Sets the category codes for punctuation to their normal values.\n% For local use with argument scanning.\n\\def\\IEEEnormalcatcodespunct{\\catcode`\\!=12 \\catcode`\\,=12 \\catcode`\\:=12\n\\catcode`\\;=12 \\catcode`\\`=12 \\catcode`\\'=12 \\catcode`\\\"=12 \\catcode`\\.=12\n\\catcode`\\/=12 \\catcode`\\?=12 \\catcode`\\*=12 \\catcode`\\+=12 \\catcode`\\-=12\n\\catcode`\\<=12 \\catcode`\\>=12 \\catcode`\\(=12 \\catcode`\\)=12 \\catcode`\\[=12\n\\catcode`\\]=12 \\catcode`\\==12 \\catcode`\\|=12}\n% Sets the category codes for numbers to their normal values.\n% For local use with argument scanning.\n\\def\\IEEEnormalcatcodesnum{\\catcode`\\0=12 \\catcode`\\1=12 \\catcode`\\2=12\n\\catcode`\\3=12 \\catcode`\\4=12 \\catcode`\\5=12 \\catcode`\\6=12 \\catcode`\\7=12\n\\catcode`\\8=12 \\catcode`\\9=12}\n% combined action of \\IEEEnormalcatcodespunct and \\IEEEnormalcatcodesnum\n\\def\\IEEEnormalcatcodes{\\IEEEnormalcatcodespunct\\IEEEnormalcatcodesnum}\n\n\n% usage: \\@IEEEextracttoken*{}\n% \\@IEEEextracttoken fully expands its argument (which it then stores in\n% \\@IEEEextracttokenarg) via \\edef and then the meaning of the first\n% nonbrace (but including the empty group) token found is assigned via \\let\n% to \\@IEEEextractedtoken as well as stored in the macro\n% \\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro. Tokens that would otherwise be discarded during\n% the acquisition of the first are stored in \\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded,\n% however their original relative brace nesting depths are not guaranteed to\n% be preserved.\n% If the argument is empty, or if a first nonbrace token does not exist (or\n% is an empty group), \\@IEEEextractedtoken will be \\relax and\n% \\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro and \\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded will be empty.\n%\n% For example:\n% \\@IEEEextracttoken{{{ab}{cd}}{{ef}g}}\n% results in:\n%\n% \\@IEEEextracttokenarg ==> a macro containing {{ab}{cd}}{{ef}g}\n% \\@IEEEextractedtoken ==> the letter a\n% \\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro ==> a macro containing a\n% \\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded ==> a macro containing bcd{ef}g\n%\n% the *-star form, \\@IEEEextracttoken*, does not expand its argument\n% contents during processing.\n\\def\\@IEEEextracttoken{\\@ifstar{\\let\\@IEEEextracttokendef=\\def\\@@IEEEextracttoken}{\\let\\@IEEEextracttokendef=\\edef\\@@IEEEextracttoken}}\n\n\\def\\@@IEEEextracttoken#1{\\@IEEEextracttokendef\\@IEEEextracttokenarg{#1}\\relax\n\\def\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded{}\\relax % initialize to empty\n% if the macro is unchanged after being acquired as a single undelimited argument\n% with anything after it being stripped off as a delimited argument\n% we know we have one token without any enclosing braces. loop until this is true.\n\\let\\@IEEEextracttokencurgroup\\@IEEEextracttokenarg\n\\loop\n % trap case of an empty argument as this would cause a problem with\n % \\@@@IEEEextracttoken's first (nondelimited) argument acquisition\n \\ifx\\@IEEEextracttokencurgroup\\@empty\n \\def\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro{}\\relax\n \\else\n \\expandafter\\@@@IEEEextracttoken\\@IEEEextracttokencurgroup\\@IEEEgeneralsequenceDELIMITER\\relax\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\\@IEEEextracttokencurgroup\n \\else\n \\let\\@IEEEextracttokencurgroup=\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\n\\repeat\n% we can safely do a \\let= here because there should be at most one token\n% the relax is needed to handle the case of no token found\n\\expandafter\\let\\expandafter\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\\relax}\n\n\\def\\@@@IEEEextracttoken#1#2\\@IEEEgeneralsequenceDELIMITER{\\def\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro{#1}\\relax\n\\def\\@@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded{#2}\\expandafter\\expandafter\\expandafter\\def\\expandafter\\expandafter\\expandafter\n\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\expandafter\\expandafter\\expandafter\n{\\expandafter\\@@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded}}\n%%\n%% -- End of Command Argument Scanning Support Functions --\n\n\n\n% Computer Society conditional execution command\n\\long\\def\\@IEEEcompsoconly#1{\\relax\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\\relax#1\\relax\\fi\\relax}\n% inverse\n\\long\\def\\@IEEEnotcompsoconly#1{\\relax\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\\else\\relax#1\\relax\\fi\\relax}\n% compsoc conference\n\\long\\def\\@IEEEcompsocconfonly#1{\\relax\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\\relax#1\\relax\\fi\\fi\\relax}\n% compsoc not conference\n\\long\\def\\@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly#1{\\relax\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\\else\\relax#1\\relax\\fi\\fi\\relax}\n\n\n% comsoc verify that newtxmath, mtpro2, mt11p or mathtime has been loaded\n\\def\\@IEEEcomsocverifymathfont{\\typeout{-- Verifying Times compatible math font.}\\relax\n \\@ifpackageloaded{newtxmath}{\\typeout{-- newtxmath loaded, OK.}}{\\@@IEEEcomsocverifymathfont}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEcomsocverifymathfont{\\@ifpackageloaded{mtpro2}{\\typeout{-- mtpro2 loaded, OK.}}{\\@@@IEEEcomsocverifymathfont}}\n\\def\\@@@IEEEcomsocverifymathfont{\\@ifpackageloaded{mt11p}{\\typeout{-- mt11p2 loaded, OK.}}{\\@@@@IEEEcomsocverifymathfont}}\n\\def\\@@@@IEEEcomsocverifymathfont{\\@ifpackageloaded{mathtime}{\\typeout{-- mathtime loaded, OK.}}{\\@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont}}\n\n% comsoc, if a Times math font was not loaded by user, enforce it\n\\def\\@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont{\\typeout{** Times compatible math font not found, forcing.}\\relax\n\\IfFileExists{newtxmath.sty}{\\typeout{-- Found newtxmath, loading.}\\RequirePackage{newtxmath}}{\\@@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont{\\IfFileExists{mtpro2.sty}{\\typeout{-- Found mtpro2, loading.}\\RequirePackage{mtpro2}}{\\@@@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont}}\n\\def\\@@@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont{\\IfFileExists{mt11p.sty}{\\typeout{-- Found mt11p, loading.}\\RequirePackage{mt11p}}{\\@@@@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont}}\n\\def\\@@@@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont{\\IfFileExists{mathtime.sty}{\\typeout{-- Found mathtime, loading.}\\RequirePackage{mathtime}}{\\@@@@@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont}}\n% if no acceptable Times math font package found, error with newtxmath requirement\n\\def\\@@@@@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont{\\typeout{** No Times compatible math font package found. newtxmath is required.}\\RequirePackage{newtxmath}}\n\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcomsoc\n % ensure that if newtxmath is used, the cmintegrals option is also invoked\n \\PassOptionsToPackage{cmintegrals}{newtxmath}\n % comsoc requires a Times like math font\n % ensure this requirement is satisfied at document start\n \\AtBeginDocument{\\@IEEEcomsocverifymathfont}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% The IEEE uses Times Roman font, so we'll default to Times.\n% These three commands make up the entire times.sty package.\n\\renewcommand{\\sfdefault}{phv}\n\\renewcommand{\\rmdefault}{ptm}\n\\renewcommand{\\ttdefault}{pcr}\n\n% V1.7 compsoc nonconference papers, use Palatino/Palladio as the main text font,\n% not Times Roman.\n\\@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly{\\renewcommand{\\rmdefault}{ppl}}\n\n% enable the selected main text font\n\\normalfont\\selectfont\n\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcomsoc\n \\typeout{-- Using IEEE Communications Society mode.}\n\\fi\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\typeout{-- Using IEEE Computer Society mode.}\n\\fi\n\n\n% V1.7 conference notice message hook\n\\def\\@IEEEconsolenoticeconference{\\typeout{}%\n\\typeout{** Conference Paper **}%\n\\typeout{Before submitting the final camera ready copy, remember to:}%\n\\typeout{}%\n\\typeout{ 1. Manually equalize the lengths of two columns on the last page}%\n\\typeout{ of your paper;}%\n\\typeout{}%\n\\typeout{ 2. Ensure that any PostScript and/or PDF output post-processing}%\n\\typeout{ uses only Type 1 fonts and that every step in the generation}%\n\\typeout{ process uses the appropriate paper size.}%\n\\typeout{}}\n\n\n% we can send console reminder messages to the user here\n\\AtEndDocument{\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\\@IEEEconsolenoticeconference\\fi}\n\n\n% warn about the use of single column other than for draft mode\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtwocolumn\\else%\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls\\else%\n \\typeout{** ATTENTION: Single column mode is not typically used with IEEE publications.}%\n \\fi%\n\\fi\n\n\n% V1.7 improved paper size setting code.\n% Set pdfpage and dvips paper sizes. Conditional tests are similar to that\n% of ifpdf.sty. Retain within {} to ensure tested macros are never altered,\n% even if only effect is to set them to \\relax.\n% if \\pdfoutput is undefined or equal to relax, output a dvips special\n{\\@ifundefined{pdfoutput}{\\AtBeginDvi{\\special{papersize=\\CLASSINFOpaperwidth,\\CLASSINFOpaperheight}}}{%\n% pdfoutput is defined and not equal to \\relax\n% check for pdfpageheight existence just in case someone sets pdfoutput\n% under non-pdflatex. If exists, set them regardless of value of \\pdfoutput.\n\\@ifundefined{pdfpageheight}{\\relax}{\\global\\pdfpagewidth\\paperwidth\n\\global\\pdfpageheight\\paperheight}%\n% if using \\pdfoutput=0 under pdflatex, send dvips papersize special\n\\ifcase\\pdfoutput\n\\AtBeginDvi{\\special{papersize=\\CLASSINFOpaperwidth,\\CLASSINFOpaperheight}}%\n\\else\n% we are using pdf output, set CLASSINFOpdf flag\n\\global\\CLASSINFOpdftrue\n\\fi}}\n\n% let the user know the selected papersize\n\\typeout{-- Using \\CLASSINFOpaperwidth\\space x \\CLASSINFOpaperheight\\space\n(\\CLASSOPTIONpaper)\\space paper.}\n\n\\ifCLASSINFOpdf\n\\typeout{-- Using PDF output.}\n\\else\n\\typeout{-- Using DVI output.}\n\\fi\n\n\n% The idea hinted here is for LaTeX to generate markleft{} and markright{}\n% automatically for you after you enter \\author{}, \\journal{},\n% \\journaldate{}, journalvol{}, \\journalnum{}, etc.\n% However, there may be some backward compatibility issues here as\n% well as some special applications for IEEEtran.cls and special issues\n% that may require the flexible \\markleft{}, \\markright{} and/or \\markboth{}.\n% We'll leave this as an open future suggestion.\n%\\newcommand{\\journal}[1]{\\def\\@journal{#1}}\n%\\def\\@journal{}\n\n\n\n% pointsize values\n% used with ifx to determine the document's normal size\n\\def\\@IEEEptsizenine{9}\n\\def\\@IEEEptsizeten{10}\n\\def\\@IEEEptsizeeleven{11}\n\\def\\@IEEEptsizetwelve{12}\n\n\n\n% FONT DEFINITIONS (No sizexx.clo file needed) \n% V1.6 revised font sizes, displayskip values and\n% revised normalsize baselineskip to reduce underfull vbox problems\n% on the 58pc = 696pt = 9.5in text height we want\n% normalsize #lines/column baselineskip (aka leading)\n% 9pt 63 11.0476pt (truncated down)\n% 10pt 58 12pt (exact)\n% 11pt 52 13.3846pt (truncated down)\n% 12pt 50 13.92pt (exact)\n%\n\n% we need to store the nominal baselineskip for the given font size\n% in case baselinestretch ever changes.\n% this is a dimen, so it will not hold stretch or shrink\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\n\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\\baselineskip\n\n\n\n%% ******* WARNING! *******\n%%\n%% Authors should not alter font sizes, baselineskip (\"leading\"),\n%% margins or other spacing values in an attempt to squeeze more\n%% material on each page.\n%%\n%% The IEEE's own typesetting software will restore the correct\n%% values when re-typesetting/proofing the submitted document,\n%% possibly resulting in unexpected article over length charges.\n%%\n%% ******* WARNING! *******\n\n\n% 9pt option defaults\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizenine\n\\typeout{-- This is a 9 point document.}\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{9}{11.0476pt}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{11.0476pt}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 3pt minus 1pt\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 3pt\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 3pt minus 1pt\n\\def\\small{\\@setfontsize{\\small}{8.5}{10pt}}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize{\\footnotesize}{8}{9pt}}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize{\\scriptsize}{7}{8pt}}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setfontsize{\\tiny}{5}{6pt}}\n% sublargesize is the same as large - 10pt\n\\def\\sublargesize{\\@setfontsize{\\sublargesize}{10}{12pt}}\n\\def\\large{\\@setfontsize{\\large}{10}{12pt}}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setfontsize{\\Large}{12}{14pt}}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize{\\LARGE}{14}{17pt}}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setfontsize{\\huge}{17}{20pt}}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setfontsize{\\Huge}{20}{24pt}}\n\\fi\n%\n% 10pt option defaults\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizeten\n\\typeout{-- This is a 10 point document.}\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{10}{12.00pt}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{12pt}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 4pt minus 2pt\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 4pt\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 4pt minus 2pt\n\\def\\small{\\@setfontsize{\\small}{9}{10pt}}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize{\\footnotesize}{8}{9pt}}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize{\\scriptsize}{7}{8pt}}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setfontsize{\\tiny}{5}{6pt}}\n% sublargesize is a tad smaller than large - 11pt\n\\def\\sublargesize{\\@setfontsize{\\sublargesize}{11}{13.4pt}}\n\\def\\large{\\@setfontsize{\\large}{12}{14pt}}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setfontsize{\\Large}{14}{17pt}}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize{\\LARGE}{17}{20pt}}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setfontsize{\\huge}{20}{24pt}}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setfontsize{\\Huge}{24}{28pt}}\n\\fi\n%\n% 11pt option defaults\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizeeleven\n\\typeout{-- This is an 11 point document.}\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{11}{13.3846pt}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{13.3846pt}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 5pt minus 3pt\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 5pt\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 5pt minus 3pt\n\\def\\small{\\@setfontsize{\\small}{10}{12pt}}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize{\\footnotesize}{9}{10.5pt}}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize{\\scriptsize}{8}{9pt}}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setfontsize{\\tiny}{6}{7pt}}\n% sublargesize is the same as large - 12pt\n\\def\\sublargesize{\\@setfontsize{\\sublargesize}{12}{14pt}}\n\\def\\large{\\@setfontsize{\\large}{12}{14pt}}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setfontsize{\\Large}{14}{17pt}}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize{\\LARGE}{17}{20pt}}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setfontsize{\\huge}{20}{24pt}}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setfontsize{\\Huge}{24}{28pt}}\n\\fi\n%\n% 12pt option defaults\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizetwelve\n\\typeout{-- This is a 12 point document.}\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{12}{13.92pt}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{13.92pt}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 6pt minus 4pt\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 6pt\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 6pt minus 4pt\n\\def\\small{\\@setfontsize{\\small}{10}{12pt}}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize{\\footnotesize}{9}{10.5pt}}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize{\\scriptsize}{8}{9pt}}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setfontsize{\\tiny}{6}{7pt}}\n% sublargesize is the same as large - 14pt\n\\def\\sublargesize{\\@setfontsize{\\sublargesize}{14}{17pt}}\n\\def\\large{\\@setfontsize{\\large}{14}{17pt}}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setfontsize{\\Large}{17}{20pt}}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize{\\LARGE}{20}{24pt}}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setfontsize{\\huge}{22}{26pt}}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setfontsize{\\Huge}{24}{28pt}}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% V1.8a compsoc font sizes\n% compsoc font sizes use bp \"Postscript\" point units (1/72in) \n% rather than the traditional pt (1/72.27)\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n% -- compsoc defaults --\n% ** will override some of these values later **\n% 9pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizenine\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{9bp}{11bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{11bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 3bp minus 1bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0bp plus 3bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 3bp minus 1bp\n\\def\\small{\\@setfontsize{\\small}{8.5bp}{10bp}}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize{\\footnotesize}{8bp}{9bp}}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize{\\scriptsize}{7bp}{8bp}}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setfontsize{\\tiny}{5bp}{6bp}}\n% sublargesize is the same as large - 10bp\n\\def\\sublargesize{\\@setfontsize{\\sublargesize}{10bp}{12bp}}\n\\def\\large{\\@setfontsize{\\large}{10bp}{12bp}}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setfontsize{\\Large}{12bp}{14bp}}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize{\\LARGE}{14bp}{17bp}}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setfontsize{\\huge}{17bp}{20bp}}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setfontsize{\\Huge}{20bp}{24bp}}\n\\fi\n%\n% 10pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizeten\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{10bp}{12bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{12bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 4bp minus 2bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 4bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 4bp minus 2bp\n\\def\\small{\\@setfontsize{\\small}{9bp}{10bp}}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize{\\footnotesize}{8bp}{9bp}}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize{\\scriptsize}{7bp}{8bp}}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setfontsize{\\tiny}{5bp}{6bp}}\n% sublargesize is a tad smaller than large - 11bp\n\\def\\sublargesize{\\@setfontsize{\\sublargesize}{11bp}{13.5bp}}\n\\def\\large{\\@setfontsize{\\large}{12bp}{14bp}}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setfontsize{\\Large}{14bp}{17bp}}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize{\\LARGE}{17bp}{20bp}}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setfontsize{\\huge}{20bp}{24bp}}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setfontsize{\\Huge}{24bp}{28bp}}\n\\fi\n%\n% 11pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizeeleven\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{11bp}{13.5bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{13.5bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 5bp minus 3bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 5bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 5bp minus 3bp\n\\def\\small{\\@setfontsize{\\small}{10bp}{12bp}}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize{\\footnotesize}{9bp}{10.5bp}}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize{\\scriptsize}{8bp}{9bp}}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setfontsize{\\tiny}{6bp}{7bp}}\n% sublargesize is the same as large - 12bp\n\\def\\sublargesize{\\@setfontsize{\\sublargesize}{12bp}{14bp}}\n\\def\\large{\\@setfontsize{\\large}{12bp}{14bp}}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setfontsize{\\Large}{14bp}{17bp}}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize{\\LARGE}{17bp}{20bp}}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setfontsize{\\huge}{20bp}{24bp}}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setfontsize{\\Huge}{24bp}{28bp}}\n\\fi\n%\n% 12pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizetwelve\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{12bp}{14bp}}%\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{14bp}%\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 6bp minus 4bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 6bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 6bp minus 4bp\n\\def\\small{\\@setfontsize{\\small}{10bp}{12bp}}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize{\\footnotesize}{9bp}{10.5bp}}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize{\\scriptsize}{8bp}{9bp}}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setfontsize{\\tiny}{6bp}{7bp}}\n% sublargesize is the same as large - 14bp\n\\def\\sublargesize{\\@setfontsize{\\sublargesize}{14bp}{17bp}}\n\\def\\large{\\@setfontsize{\\large}{14bp}{17bp}}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setfontsize{\\Large}{17bp}{20bp}}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize{\\LARGE}{20bp}{24bp}}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setfontsize{\\huge}{22bp}{26bp}}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setfontsize{\\Huge}{24bp}{28bp}}\n\\fi\n%\n% -- override defaults: compsoc journals use special normalsizes --\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n% \n% compsoc conferences\n% 9pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizenine\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{9bp}{10.8bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{10.8bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 3bp minus 1bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0bp plus 3bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 3bp minus 1bp\n\\fi\n% 10pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizeten\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{10bp}{11.2bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{11.2bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 4bp minus 2bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 4bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 4bp minus 2bp\n\\fi\n% 11pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizeeleven\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{11bp}{13.2bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{13.2bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 5bp minus 3bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 5bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 5bp minus 3bp\n\\fi\n% 12pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizetwelve\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{12bp}{14.4bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{14.4bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 6bp minus 4bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 6bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 6bp minus 4bp\n\\fi\n% \n% compsoc nonconferences\n\\else\n% 9pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizenine\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{9bp}{10.8bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{10.8bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 3bp minus 1bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0bp plus 3bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 3bp minus 1bp\n\\fi\n% 10pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizeten\n% the official spec is 9.5bp with 11.4bp leading for 10pt,\n% but measurements of proofs suggest upto 11.723bp leading\n% here we'll use 11.54bp which gives 61 lines per column\n% with the standard compsoc margins\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{9.5bp}{11.54bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{11.54bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 4bp minus 2bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 4bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 4bp minus 2bp\n\\fi\n% 11pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizeeleven\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{11bp}{13.2bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{13.2bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 5bp minus 3bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 5bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 5bp minus 3bp\n\\fi\n% 12pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizetwelve\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{12bp}{14.4bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{14.4bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 6bp minus 4bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 6bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 6bp minus 4bp\n\\fi\n\\fi\\fi\n\n\n\n\n% V1.6 The Computer Modern Fonts will issue a substitution warning for\n% 24pt titles (24.88pt is used instead, but the default and correct\n% Times font will scale exactly as needed) increase the substitution\n% tolerance to turn off this warning.\n% \n% V1.8a, the compsoc bp font sizes can also cause bogus font substitution\n% warnings with footnote or scriptsize math and the $\\bullet$ itemized\n% list of \\IEEEcompsocitemizethanks. So, increase this to 1.5pt or more.\n\\def\\fontsubfuzz{1.7bp}\n\n\n% warn the user in case they forget to use the 9pt option with\n% technote\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote%\n \\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizenine\\else%\n \\typeout{** ATTENTION: Technotes are normally 9pt documents.}%\n \\fi%\n\\fi\n\n\n% V1.7\n% Improved \\textunderscore to provide a much better fake _ when used with\n% OT1 encoding. Under OT1, detect use of pcr or cmtt \\ttfamily and use\n% available true _ glyph for those two typewriter fonts.\n\\def\\@IEEEstringptm{ptm} % Times Roman family\n\\def\\@IEEEstringppl{ppl} % Palatino Roman family\n\\def\\@IEEEstringphv{phv} % Helvetica Sans Serif family\n\\def\\@IEEEstringpcr{pcr} % Courier typewriter family\n\\def\\@IEEEstringcmtt{cmtt} % Computer Modern typewriter family\n\\DeclareTextCommandDefault{\\textunderscore}{\\leavevmode\n\\ifx\\f@family\\@IEEEstringpcr\\string_\\else\n\\ifx\\f@family\\@IEEEstringcmtt\\string_\\else\n\\ifx\\f@family\\@IEEEstringptm\\kern 0em\\vbox{\\hrule\\@width 0.5em\\@height 0.5pt\\kern -0.3ex}\\else\n\\ifx\\f@family\\@IEEEstringppl\\kern 0em\\vbox{\\hrule\\@width 0.5em\\@height 0.5pt\\kern -0.3ex}\\else\n\\ifx\\f@family\\@IEEEstringphv\\kern -0.03em\\vbox{\\hrule\\@width 0.62em\\@height 0.52pt\\kern -0.33ex}\\kern -0.03em\\else\n\\kern 0.09em\\vbox{\\hrule\\@width 0.6em\\@height 0.44pt\\kern -0.63pt\\kern -0.42ex}\\kern 0.09em\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\relax}\n\n\n\n\n% set the default \\baselinestretch\n\\def\\baselinestretch{1}\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls\n \\def\\baselinestretch{1.5}% default baselinestretch for draft modes\n\\fi \n\n\n% process CLASSINPUT baselinestretch\n\\ifx\\CLASSINPUTbaselinestretch\\@IEEEundefined\n\\else\n \\edef\\baselinestretch{\\CLASSINPUTbaselinestretch} % user CLASSINPUT override\n \\typeout{** ATTENTION: Overriding \\string\\baselinestretch\\space to\n \\baselinestretch\\space via \\string\\CLASSINPUT.}\n\\fi\n\n\\small\\normalsize % make \\baselinestretch take affect\n\n\n\n\n% store the normalsize baselineskip\n\\newdimen\\CLASSINFOnormalsizebaselineskip\n\\CLASSINFOnormalsizebaselineskip=\\baselineskip\\relax\n% and the normalsize unity (baselinestretch=1) baselineskip\n% we could save a register by giving the user access to\n% \\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip. However, let's protect\n% its read only internal status\n\\newdimen\\CLASSINFOnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\n\\CLASSINFOnormalsizeunitybaselineskip=\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\\relax\n% store the nominal value of jot\n\\newdimen\\IEEEnormaljot\n\\IEEEnormaljot=0.25\\baselineskip\\relax\n\n% set \\jot\n\\jot=\\IEEEnormaljot\\relax\n\n\n\n\n% V1.6, we are now going to fine tune the interword spacing\n% The default interword glue for Times under TeX appears to use a\n% nominal interword spacing of 25% (relative to the font size, i.e., 1em)\n% a maximum of 40% and a minimum of 19%.\n% For example, 10pt text uses an interword glue of:\n% \n% 2.5pt plus 1.49998pt minus 0.59998pt\n% \n% However, the IEEE allows for a more generous range which reduces the need\n% for hyphenation, especially for two column text. Furthermore, the IEEE\n% tends to use a little bit more nominal space between the words.\n% The IEEE's interword spacing percentages appear to be:\n% 35% nominal\n% 23% minimum\n% 50% maximum\n% (They may even be using a tad more for the largest fonts such as 24pt.)\n% \n% for bold text, the IEEE increases the spacing a little more:\n% 37.5% nominal\n% 23% minimum\n% 55% maximum\n\n% here are the interword spacing ratios we'll use\n% for medium (normal weight)\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceratioM{0.35}\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceMINratioM{0.23}\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceMAXratioM{0.50}\n\n% for bold\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceratioB{0.375}\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceMINratioB{0.23}\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceMAXratioB{0.55}\n\n\n% compsoc nonconference papers use Palatino,\n% tweak settings to better match the proofs\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\\else\n% for medium (normal weight)\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceratioM{0.28}\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceMINratioM{0.21}\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceMAXratioM{0.47}\n% for bold\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceratioB{0.305}\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceMINratioB{0.21}\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceMAXratioB{0.52}\n\\fi\\fi\n\n\n% command to revise the interword spacing for the current font under TeX:\n% \\fontdimen2 = nominal interword space\n% \\fontdimen3 = interword stretch\n% \\fontdimen4 = interword shrink\n% since all changes to the \\fontdimen are global, we can enclose these commands\n% in braces to confine any font attribute or length changes\n\\def\\@@@IEEEsetfontdimens#1#2#3{{%\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}{\\f@size pt}% grab the font size in pt, could use 1em instead.\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{#1\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}%\n\\fontdimen2\\font=\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\addtolength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{-#2\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}%\n\\fontdimen3\\font=-\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{#1\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}%\n\\addtolength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{-#3\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}%\n\\fontdimen4\\font=\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax}}\n\n% revise the interword spacing for each font weight\n\\def\\@@IEEEsetfontdimens{{%\n\\mdseries\n\\@@@IEEEsetfontdimens{\\@IEEEinterspaceratioM}{\\@IEEEinterspaceMAXratioM}{\\@IEEEinterspaceMINratioM}%\n\\bfseries\n\\@@@IEEEsetfontdimens{\\@IEEEinterspaceratioB}{\\@IEEEinterspaceMAXratioB}{\\@IEEEinterspaceMINratioB}%\n}}\n\n% revise the interword spacing for each font shape\n% \\slshape is not often used for IEEE work and is not altered here. The \\scshape caps are\n% already a tad too large in the free LaTeX fonts (as compared to what the IEEE uses) so we\n% won't alter these either.\n\\def\\@IEEEsetfontdimens{{%\n\\normalfont\n\\@@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\normalfont\\itshape\n\\@@IEEEsetfontdimens\n}}\n\n% command to revise the interword spacing for each font size (and shape\n% and weight). Only the \\rmfamily is done here as \\ttfamily uses a \n% fixed spacing and \\sffamily is not used as the main text of IEEE papers.\n\\def\\@IEEEtunefonts{{\\selectfont\\rmfamily\n\\tiny\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\scriptsize\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\footnotesize\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\small\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\normalsize\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\sublargesize\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\large\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\LARGE\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\huge\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\Huge\\@IEEEsetfontdimens}}\n\n% if the nofonttune class option is not given, revise the interword spacing\n% now - in case IEEEtran makes any default length measurements, and make\n% sure all the default fonts are loaded\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONnofonttune\\else\n\\@IEEEtunefonts\n\\fi\n\n% and again at the start of the document in case the user loaded different fonts\n\\AtBeginDocument{\\ifCLASSOPTIONnofonttune\\else\\@IEEEtunefonts\\fi}\n\n\n\n\n\n% -- V1.8a page setup commands --\n\n% The default sample text for calculating margins\n% Note that IEEE publications use \\scriptsize for headers and footers.\n\\def\\IEEEdefaultsampletext{\\normalfont\\normalsize gT}\n\\def\\IEEEdefaultheadersampletext{\\normalfont\\scriptsize T}% IEEE headers default to uppercase\n\\def\\IEEEdefaultfootersampletext{\\normalfont\\scriptsize gT}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\IEEEsettextwidth{inner margin}{outer margin}\n% Sets \\textwidth to allow the specified inner and outer margins\n% for the current \\paperwidth.\n\\def\\IEEEsettextwidth#1#2{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\paperwidth\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB#1\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB#2\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\textwidth\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\IEEEsetsidemargin{mode: i, o, c, a}{margin/offset}\n% Sets \\oddsidemargin and \\evensidemargin to yield the specified margin\n% of the given mode.\n% The available modes are:\n% i = inner margin\n% o = outer margin\n% c = centered, with the given offset\n% a = adjust the margins using the given offset\n% For the offsets, positive values increase the inner margin.\n% \\textwidth should be set properly for the given margins before calling this\n% function.\n\\def\\IEEEsetsidemargin#1#2{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA #2\\relax\n\\@IEEEextracttoken{#1}\\relax\n% check for mode errors\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\\@empty\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Empty mode type in \\string\\IEEEsetsidemargin\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `i'}{Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEsetsidemargin\\space are: i, o, c and a.}\\relax\n \\let\\@IEEEextractedtoken=i\\relax\n \\def\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro{i}\\relax\n\\else\n \\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\@empty\\else\n \\typeout{** WARNING: \\string\\IEEEsetsidemargin\\space mode specifiers after the first in `\\@IEEEextracttokenarg' ignored (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\relax\n \\fi\n\\fi\n% handle each mode\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken a\\relax\n \\advance\\oddsidemargin by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken c\\relax\n \\oddsidemargin\\paperwidth\n \\advance\\oddsidemargin by -\\textwidth\n \\divide\\oddsidemargin by 2\\relax\n \\advance\\oddsidemargin by -1in\\relax\n \\advance\\oddsidemargin by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken o\\relax\n \\oddsidemargin\\paperwidth\n \\advance\\oddsidemargin by -\\textwidth\n \\advance\\oddsidemargin by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n \\advance\\oddsidemargin by -1in\\relax\n\\else\n \\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken i\\relax\n \\else\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Unknown mode type `\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro' in \\string\\IEEEsetsidemargin\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `i'}%\n {Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEsetsidemargin\\space are: i, o, c and a.}%\n \\fi\n \\oddsidemargin\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n \\advance\\oddsidemargin by -1in\\relax\n\\fi\\fi\\fi\n% odd and even side margins both mean \"inner\" for single sided pages\n\\evensidemargin\\oddsidemargin\n% but are mirrors of each other when twosided is in effect\n\\if@twoside\n \\evensidemargin\\paperwidth\n \\advance\\evensidemargin by -\\textwidth\n \\advance\\evensidemargin by -\\oddsidemargin\n % have to compensate for both the builtin 1in LaTex offset\n % and the fact we already subtracted this offset from \\oddsidemargin\n \\advance\\evensidemargin -2in\\relax\n\\fi}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\IEEEsettextheight[sample text]{top text margin}{bottom text margin}\n% Sets \\textheight based on the specified top margin and bottom margin.\n% Takes into consideration \\paperheight, \\topskip, and (by default) the\n% the actual height and depth of the \\IEEEdefaultsampletext text. \n\\def\\IEEEsettextheight{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@IEEEsettextheight}{\\@IEEEsettextheight[\\IEEEdefaultsampletext]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEsettextheight[#1]#2#3{\\textheight\\paperheight\\relax\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA #2\\relax\n \\advance \\textheight by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA% subtract top margin\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA #3\\relax\n \\advance \\textheight by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA% subtract bottom margin\n \\advance \\textheight by \\topskip% add \\topskip\n % subtract off everything above the top, and below the bottom, baselines\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance \\textheight by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance \\textheight by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\n\n\n\n\\newdimen\\IEEEquantizedlength\n\\IEEEquantizedlength 0sp\\relax\n\\newdimen\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff\n\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff 0sp\\relax\n\\def\\IEEEquantizedlengthint{0}\n\n% usage: \\IEEEquantizelength{mode: d, c, i}{base unit}{length}\n% Sets the length \\IEEEquantizedlength to be an integer multiple of the given\n% (nonzero) base unit such that \\IEEEquantizedlength approximates the given\n% length.\n% \\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff is a length equal to the difference between the\n% \\IEEEquantizedlength and the given length.\n% \\IEEEquantizedlengthint is a macro containing the integer number of base units\n% in \\IEEEquantizedlength.\n% i.e., \\IEEEquantizedlength = \\IEEEquantizedlengthint * base unit\n% The mode determines how \\IEEEquantizedlength is quantized:\n% d = always decrease (always round down \\IEEEquantizeint)\n% c = use the closest match\n% i = always increase (always round up \\IEEEquantizeint)\n% In anycase, if the given length is already quantized,\n% \\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff will be set to zero.\n\\def\\IEEEquantizelength#1#2#3{\\begingroup\n% work in isolation so as not to externally disturb the \\@IEEEtrantmp\n% variables\n% load the argument values indirectly via \\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff\n% in case the user refers to our \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenX, \\IEEEquantizedlength,\n% etc. in the arguments. we also will work with these as counters,\n% i.e., in sp units\n% A has the base unit\n\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff #2\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff\n% B has the input length\n\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff #3\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA sp\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB sp\\relax\n% \\@IEEEtrantmpcountC will have the quantized int\n% \\IEEEquantizedlength will have the quantized length\n% \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC will have the quantized diff\n% initialize them to zero as this is what will be\n% exported if an error occurs\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC 0\\relax\n\\IEEEquantizedlength 0sp\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC 0sp\\relax\n% extract mode\n\\@IEEEextracttoken{#1}\\relax\n% check for mode errors\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\\@empty\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Empty mode type in \\string\\IEEEquantizelength\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `d'}{Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEquantizelength\\space are: d, c and i.}\\relax\n \\let\\@IEEEextractedtoken=d\\relax\n \\def\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro{d}\\relax\n\\else\n \\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\@empty\\else\n \\typeout{** WARNING: \\string\\IEEEquantizelength\\space mode specifiers after the first in `\\@IEEEextracttokenarg' ignored (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\relax\n \\fi\n\\fi\n% check for base unit is zero error\n\\ifnum\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA=0\\relax\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Base unit is zero in \\string\\IEEEquantizelength\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n \\string\\IEEEquantizedlength\\space and \\string\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff\\space are set to zero}{Division by zero is not allowed.}\\relax\n\\else% base unit is nonzero\n % \\@IEEEtrantmpcountC carries the number of integer units\n % in the quantized length (integer length \\ base)\n \\@IEEEtrantmpcountC\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB\\relax\n \\divide\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC by \\@IEEEtrantmpcountA\\relax\n % \\IEEEquantizedlength has the (rounded down) quantized length\n % = base * int\n \\IEEEquantizedlength\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n \\multiply\\IEEEquantizedlength by \\@IEEEtrantmpcountC\\relax\n % \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC has the difference\n % = quantized length - length\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\\IEEEquantizedlength\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax\n % trap special case of length being already quantized\n % to avoid a roundup under i option\n \\ifdim\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC=0sp\\relax\n \\else % length not is already quantized\n % set dimenA to carry the upper quantized (absolute value) difference:\n % quantizedlength + base - length\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by \\IEEEquantizedlength\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax\n % set dimenB to carry the lower quantized (absolute value) difference:\n % length - quantizedlength\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\IEEEquantizedlength\\relax\n % handle each mode\n \\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken c\\relax\n % compare upper and lower amounts, select upper if lower > upper\n \\ifdim\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB>\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n % use upper\n \\advance\\IEEEquantizedlength by \\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA sp\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC by 1\\relax\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n \\else% <=. uselower\n % no need to do anything for lower, use output values already setup\n \\fi\n \\else% not mode c\n \\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken i\\relax\n % always round up under i mode\n \\advance\\IEEEquantizedlength by \\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA sp\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC by 1\\relax\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n \\else\n \\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken d\\relax\n \\else\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Unknown mode type `\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro' in \\string\\IEEEquantizelength\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `d'}%\n {Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEquantizelength\\space are: d, c, and i.}\\relax\n \\fi % if d\n % no need to do anything for d, use output values already setup\n \\fi\\fi % if i, c\n \\fi % if length is already quantized\n\\fi% if base unit is zero\n% globally assign the results to macros we use here to escape the enclosing\n% group without needing to call \\global on any of the \\@IEEEtrantmp variables.\n% \\@IEEEtrantmpcountC has the quantized int\n% \\IEEEquantizedlength has the quantized length\n% \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC has the quantized diff\n\\xdef\\@IEEEquantizedlengthintmacro{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC}\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC\\IEEEquantizedlength\\relax\n\\xdef\\@IEEEquantizedlengthmacro{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC}\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\\relax\n\\xdef\\@IEEEquantizedlengthdiffmacro{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC}\\relax\n\\endgroup\n% locally assign the outputs here from the macros\n\\expandafter\\IEEEquantizedlength\\@IEEEquantizedlengthmacro sp\\relax\n\\expandafter\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff\\@IEEEquantizedlengthdiffmacro sp\\relax\n\\edef\\IEEEquantizedlengthint{\\@IEEEquantizedlengthintmacro}\\relax}\n\n\n\n\\newdimen\\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff\n\\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff 0sp\\relax\n\n% usage: \\IEEEquantizetextheight[base unit]{mode: d, c, i}\n% Sets \\textheight to be an integer multiple of the current \\baselineskip\n% (or the optionally specified base unit) plus the first (\\topskip) line.\n% \\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff is a length equal to the difference between\n% the new quantized and original \\textheight.\n% \\IEEEquantizedtextheightlpc is a macro containing the integer number of\n% lines per column under the quantized \\textheight. i.e.,\n% \\textheight = \\IEEEquantizedtextheightlpc * \\baselineskip + \\topskip\n% The mode determines how \\textheight is quantized:\n% d = always decrease (always round down the number of lines per column)\n% c = use the closest match\n% i = always increase (always round up the number of lines per column)\n% In anycase, if \\textheight is already quantized, it will remain unchanged,\n% and \\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff will be set to zero.\n% Depends on: \\IEEEquantizelength\n\\def\\IEEEquantizetextheight{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@IEEEquantizetextheight}{\\@IEEEquantizetextheight[\\baselineskip]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEquantizetextheight[#1]#2{\\begingroup\n% use our \\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff as a scratch pad\n% we need to subtract off \\topskip before quantization\n\\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff\\textheight\n\\advance\\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff by -\\topskip\\relax\n\\IEEEquantizelength{#2}{#1}{\\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff}\n% add back \\topskip line\n\\advance\\IEEEquantizedlength by \\topskip\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC\\IEEEquantizedlengthint\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC by 1\\relax\n% globally assign the results to macros we use here to escape the enclosing\n% group without needing to call \\global on any of the \\@IEEEtrantmp variables.\n\\xdef\\@IEEEquantizedtextheightlpcmacro{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC}\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC\\IEEEquantizedlength\\relax\n\\xdef\\@IEEEquantizedtextheightmacro{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC}\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff\\relax\n\\xdef\\@IEEEquantizedtextheightdiffmacro{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC}\\relax\n\\endgroup\n% locally assign the outputs here from the macros\n\\textheight\\@IEEEquantizedtextheightmacro sp\\relax\n\\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff\\@IEEEquantizedtextheightdiffmacro sp\\relax\n\\edef\\IEEEquantizedtextheightlpc{\\@IEEEquantizedtextheightlpcmacro}}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\IEEEsettopmargin[sample text]{mode: t, b, c, a, q}{margin/offset}\n% Sets \\topmargin based on the specified vertical margin.\n% Takes into consideration the base 1in offset, \\headheight, \\headsep,\n% \\topskip, and (by default) the the actual height (or, for the bottom, depth)\n% of the \\IEEEdefaultsampletext text.\n% The available modes are:\n% t = top margin\n% b = bottom margin\n% c = vertically centered, with the given offset\n% a = adjust the vertical margins using the given offset\n% q = adjust the margins using \\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff and the given offset\n% For the offsets, positive values increase the top margin.\n% \\headheight, \\headsep, \\topskip and \\textheight should be set properly for the\n% given margins before calling this function.\n\\def\\IEEEsettopmargin{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@IEEEsettopmargin}{\\@IEEEsettopmargin[\\IEEEdefaultsampletext]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEsettopmargin[#1]#2#3{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA #3\\relax\n\\@IEEEextracttoken{#2}\\relax\n% check for mode errors\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\\@empty\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Empty mode type in \\string\\IEEEsettopmargin\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `t'}{Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEsettopmargin\\space are: t, b, c, a and q.}\\relax\n \\let\\@IEEEextractedtoken=t\\relax\n \\def\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro{t}\\relax\n\\else\n \\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\@empty\\else\n \\typeout{** WARNING: \\string\\IEEEsettopmargin\\space mode specifiers after the first in `\\@IEEEextracttokenarg' ignored (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\relax\n \\fi\n\\fi\n% handle each mode\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken a\\relax\n \\advance\\topmargin by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken q\\relax\n % we need to adjust by half the \\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff value\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff\\relax\n \\divide\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by 2\\relax\n % a positive \\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff means we need to reduce \\topmargin\n % because \\textheight has been lenghtened\n \\advance\\topmargin by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax\n \\advance\\topmargin by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken c\\relax\n \\topmargin\\paperheight\n \\advance\\topmargin by -\\textheight\n % \\textheight includes \\topskip, but we should not count topskip whitespace here, backout\n \\advance \\topmargin by \\topskip\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\topmargin by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\topmargin by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax\n \\divide\\topmargin by 2\\relax\n \\advance\\topmargin by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken b\\relax\n \\topmargin\\paperheight\n \\advance\\topmargin by -\\textheight\n % \\textheight includes \\topskip, but we should not count topskip whitespace here, backout\n \\advance \\topmargin by \\topskip\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\topmargin by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax\n \\advance\\topmargin by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\else\n \\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken t\\relax\n \\else\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Unknown mode type `\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro' in \\string\\IEEEsettopmargin\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `t'}%\n {Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEsettopmargin\\space are: t, b, c, a and q.}\\relax\n \\fi\n \\topmargin\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\topmargin by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax\n\\fi\\fi % if t, b, c\n% convert desired top margin into actual \\topmargin\n% this is not done for the q or a modes because they are only adjustments\n\\advance \\topmargin by -\\topskip\n\\advance \\topmargin by -1in\n\\advance \\topmargin by -\\headheight\n\\advance \\topmargin by -\\headsep\n\\fi\\fi % if q, a\n}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\IEEEsetheadermargin[header sample][text sample]{mode: t, b, c, a}{margin/offset}\n% Differentially adjusts \\topmargin and \\headsep (such that their sum is unchanged)\n% based on the specified header margin.\n% Takes into consideration the base 1in offset, \\headheight, \\topskip, and (by default)\n% the actual height (or depth) of the \\IEEEdefaultheadersampletext and\n% \\IEEEdefaultsampletext text.\n% The available modes are:\n% t = top margin (top of the header text to the top of the page)\n% b = bottom margin (bottom of the header text to the top of the main text)\n% c = vertically centered between the main text and the top of the page,\n% with the given offset\n% a = adjust the vertical position using the given offset\n% For the offsets, positive values move the header downward.\n% \\headheight, \\headsep, \\topskip and \\topmargin should be set properly before\n% calling this function.\n\\def\\IEEEsetheadermargin{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@IEEEsetheadermargin}{\\@IEEEsetheadermargin[\\IEEEdefaultheadersampletext]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEsetheadermargin[#1]{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@@IEEEsetheadermargin[#1]}{\\@@IEEEsetheadermargin[#1][\\IEEEdefaultsampletext]}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEsetheadermargin[#1][#2]#3#4{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA #4\\relax\n\\@IEEEextracttoken{#3}\\relax\n% check for mode errors\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\\@empty\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Empty mode type in \\string\\IEEEsetheadermargin\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `t'}{Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEsetheadermargin\\space are: t, b, c, and a.}\\relax\n \\let\\@IEEEextractedtoken=t\\relax\n \\def\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro{t}\\relax\n\\else\n \\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\@empty\\else\n \\typeout{** WARNING: \\string\\IEEEsetheadermargin\\space mode specifiers after the first in `\\@IEEEextracttokenarg' ignored (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\relax\n \\fi\n\\fi\n% handle each mode\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken a\\relax\n % No need to do anything here and can pass through the adjustment\n % value as is. The end adjustment of \\topmargin and \\headsep will\n % do all that is needed\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken c\\relax\n % get the bottom margin\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\headsep\\relax\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by \\topskip\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #2\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n % at this point \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB has the actual header bottom margin\n % subtract from it the top header margin\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB -1in\\relax % take into consideration the system 1in offset of the top margin\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\topmargin\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\headheight\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n % at this point \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB has the difference between the bottom and top margins\n % we need to adjust by half this amount to center the header\n \\divide\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by 2\\relax\n % and add to offset\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken b\\relax\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\headsep\\relax\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by \\topskip\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #2\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n % at this point \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB has the actual header bottom margin\n % get the difference between the actual and the desired\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\else\n \\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken t\\relax\n \\else\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Unknown mode type `\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro' in \\string\\IEEEsetheadermargin\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `t'}%\n {Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEsetheadermargin\\space are: t, b, c and a.}\\relax\n \\fi\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB 1in\\relax % take into consideration the system 1in offset of the top margin\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by \\topmargin\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by \\headheight\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n % at this point \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB has the actual header top margin\n % get the difference between the desired and the actual\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\fi\\fi % if t, b, c\n\\fi % if a\n% advance \\topmargin by the needed amount and reduce \\headsep by the same\n% so as not to disturb the location of the main text\n\\advance\\topmargin by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\advance\\headsep by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\IEEEsetfootermargin[footer sample][text sample]{mode: t, b, c, a}{margin/offset}\n% Adjusts \\footskip based on the specified footer margin.\n% Takes into consideration the base 1in offset, \\paperheight, \\headheight,\n% \\headsep, \\textheight and (by default) the actual height (or depth) of the\n% \\IEEEdefaultfootersampletext and \\IEEEdefaultsampletext text.\n% The available modes are:\n% t = top margin (top of the footer text to the bottom of the main text)\n% b = bottom margin (bottom of the footer text to the bottom of page)\n% c = vertically centered between the main text and the bottom of the page,\n% with the given offset\n% a = adjust the vertical position using the given offset\n% For the offsets, positive values move the footer downward.\n% \\headheight, \\headsep, \\topskip, \\topmargin, and \\textheight should be set\n% properly before calling this function.\n\\def\\IEEEsetfootermargin{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@IEEEsetfootermargin}{\\@IEEEsetfootermargin[\\IEEEdefaultfootersampletext]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEsetfootermargin[#1]{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@@IEEEsetfootermargin[#1]}{\\@@IEEEsetfootermargin[#1][\\IEEEdefaultsampletext]}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEsetfootermargin[#1][#2]#3#4{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA #4\\relax\n\\@IEEEextracttoken{#3}\\relax\n% check for mode errors\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\\@empty\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Empty mode type in \\string\\IEEEsetfootermargin\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `t'}{Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEsetfootermargin\\space are: t, b, c, and a.}\\relax\n \\let\\@IEEEextractedtoken=t\\relax\n \\def\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro{t}\\relax\n\\else\n \\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\@empty\\else\n \\typeout{** WARNING: \\string\\IEEEsetfootermargin\\space mode specifiers after the first in `\\@IEEEextracttokenarg' ignored (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\relax\n \\fi\n\\fi\n% handle each mode\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken a\\relax\n % No need to do anything here and can pass through the adjustment\n % value as is. The end adjustment of \\footskip will do all that\n % is needed\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken c\\relax\n % calculate the bottom margin\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB 1in\\relax % system 1in offset\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\topmargin\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\headheight\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\headsep\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\textheight\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\footskip\\relax\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\paperheight\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n % at this point \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB has the actual footer bottom margin\n % now subtract off the footer top margin\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB -\\footskip\\relax\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #2\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n % at this point \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB has the difference between the bottom\n % and top footer margins\n % our adjustment must be half this value to center the footer\n \\divide\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by 2\\relax\n % add to the offset\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken b\\relax\n % calculate the bottom margin\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB 1in\\relax % system 1in offset\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\topmargin\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\headheight\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\headsep\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\textheight\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\footskip\\relax\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\paperheight\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n % at this point \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB has the actual footer bottom margin\n % get the difference between the actual and the desired\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\else\n \\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken t\\relax\n \\else\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Unknown mode type `\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro' in \\string\\IEEEsetfootermargin\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `t'}%\n {Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEsetfootermargin\\space are: t, b, c and a.}\\relax\n \\fi\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\footskip\\relax\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #2\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n % at this point \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB has the actual footer top margin\n % get the difference between the desired and the actual\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\fi\\fi % if t, b, c\n\\fi % if a\n% advance \\footskip by the needed amount\n\\advance\\footskip by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n}\n\n% -- End V1.8a page setup commands --\n\n\n\n\n\n% V1.6\n% LaTeX is a little to quick to use hyphenations\n% So, we increase the penalty for their use and raise\n% the badness level that triggers an underfull hbox\n% warning. The author may still have to tweak things,\n% but the appearance will be much better \"right out\n% of the box\" than that under V1.5 and prior.\n% TeX default is 50\n\\hyphenpenalty=750\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\hyphenpenalty 500\n\\fi\n% If we didn't adjust the interword spacing, 2200 might be better.\n% The TeX default is 1000\n\\hbadness=1350\n% The IEEE does not use extra spacing after punctuation\n\\frenchspacing\n\n% V1.7 increase this a tad to discourage equation breaks\n\\binoppenalty=1000 % default 700\n\\relpenalty=800 % default 500\n\n% v1.8a increase these to discourage widows and orphans\n\\clubpenalty=1000 % default 150\n\\widowpenalty=1000 % default 150\n\\displaywidowpenalty=1000 % default 50\n\n\n% margin note stuff\n\\marginparsep 10pt\n\\marginparwidth 20pt\n\\marginparpush 25pt\n\n\n% if things get too close, go ahead and let them touch\n\\lineskip 0pt\n\\normallineskip 0pt\n\\lineskiplimit 0pt\n\\normallineskiplimit 0pt\n\n% The distance from the lower edge of the text body to the\n% footline\n\\footskip 0.4in\n\n% normally zero, should be relative to font height.\n% put in a little rubber to help stop some bad breaks (underfull vboxes)\n\\parskip 0ex plus 0.2ex minus 0.1ex\n\n\\parindent 1.0em\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\parindent 1.5em\n\\fi\n\n\\headheight 12pt\n\\headsep 18pt\n% use the normal font baselineskip\n% so that \\topskip is unaffected by changes in \\baselinestretch\n\\topskip=\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\n\n\n% V1.8 \\maxdepth defaults to 4pt, but should be font size dependent\n\\maxdepth=0.5\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\n\\textheight 58pc % 9.63in, 696pt\n\n% set the default top margin to 58pt\n% which results in a \\topmargin of -49.59pt for 10pt documents\n\\IEEEsettopmargin{t}{58pt}\n% tweak textheight to a perfect integer number of lines/column.\n% standard is: 9pt/63 lpc; 10pt/58 lpc; 11pt/52 lpc; 12pt/50 lpc\n\\IEEEquantizetextheight{c}\n% tweak top margin so that the error is shared equally at the top and bottom\n\\IEEEsettopmargin{q}{0sp}\n\n\n\\columnsep 1pc\n\\textwidth 43pc % 2 x 21pc + 1pc = 43pc\n\n% set the default side margins to center the text\n\\IEEEsetsidemargin{c}{0pt}\n\n\n% adjust margins for default conference mode\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n \\textheight 9.25in % The standard for conferences (668.4975pt)\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{t}{0.75in}\n % tweak textheight to a perfect integer number of lines/page.\n % standard is: 9pt/61 lpc; 10pt/56 lpc; 11pt/50 lpc; 12pt/48 lpc\n \\IEEEquantizetextheight{c}\n % tweak top margin so that the error is shared equally at the top and bottom\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{q}{0sp}\n\\fi\n\n\n% compsoc text sizes, margins and spacings\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\columnsep 12bp\n % CS specs for \\textwdith are 6.875in\n % \\textwidth 6.875in\n % however, measurements from proofs show they are using 3.5in columns\n \\textwidth 7in\n \\advance\\textwidth by \\columnsep\n % set the side margins to center the text\n \\IEEEsetsidemargin{c}{0pt}\n % top/bottom margins to center\n % could just set \\textheight to 9.75in for all the different paper sizes\n % and then quantize, but we'll do it the long way here to allow for easy\n % future per-paper size adjustments\n \\IEEEsettextheight{0.625in}{0.625in}% 11in - 2 * 0.625in = 9.75in is the standard text height for compsoc journals\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{t}{0.625in}\n \\if@IEEEusingcspaper\n \\IEEEsettextheight{0.5in}{0.5in}% 10.75in - 2 * 0.5in = 9.75in\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{t}{0.5in}\n \\fi\n \\if@IEEEusingAfourpaper\n \\IEEEsettextheight{24.675mm}{24.675mm}% 297mm - 2 * 24.675mm = 247.650mm (9.75in)\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{t}{24.675mm}\n \\fi\n % tweak textheight to a perfect integer number of lines/page.\n % standard is: 9pt/65 lpc; 10pt/61 lpc; 11pt/53 lpc; 12pt/49 lpc\n \\IEEEquantizetextheight{c}\n % tweak top margin so that the error is shared equally at the top and bottom\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{q}{0sp}\n\n% compsoc conference\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n % compsoc conference use a larger value for columnsep\n \\columnsep 0.25in\n \\IEEEsettextwidth{0.75in}{0.75in}\n % set the side margins to center the text (0.75in for letterpaper)\n \\IEEEsetsidemargin{c}{0pt}\n % compsoc conferences want 1in top and bottom margin\n \\IEEEsettextheight{1in}{1in}\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{t}{1in}\n % tweak textheight to a perfect integer number of lines/page.\n % standard is: 9pt/58 lpc; 10pt/53 lpc; 11pt/48 lpc; 12pt/46 lpc\n \\IEEEquantizetextheight{c}\n % tweak top margin so that the error is shared equally at the top and bottom\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{q}{0sp}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% draft mode settings override that of all other modes\n% provides a nice 1in margin all around the paper and extra\n% space between the lines for editor's comments\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls\n % we want 1in side margins regardless of paper type\n \\IEEEsettextwidth{1in}{1in}\n \\IEEEsetsidemargin{c}{0pt}\n % want 1in top and bottom margins\n \\IEEEsettextheight{1in}{1in}\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{t}{1in}\n % digitize textheight to be an integer number of lines.\n % this may cause the top and bottom margins to be off a tad\n \\IEEEquantizetextheight{c}\n % tweak top margin so that the error is shared equally at the top and bottom\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{q}{0sp}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% process CLASSINPUT inner/outer margin\n% if inner margin defined, but outer margin not, set outer to inner.\n\\ifx\\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin\\@IEEEundefined\n\\else\n \\ifx\\CLASSINPUToutersidemargin\\@IEEEundefined\n \\edef\\CLASSINPUToutersidemargin{\\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\\ifx\\CLASSINPUToutersidemargin\\@IEEEundefined\n\\else\n % if outer margin defined, but inner margin not, set inner to outer.\n \\ifx\\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin\\@IEEEundefined\n \\edef\\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin{\\CLASSINPUToutersidemargin}\n \\fi\n \\IEEEsettextwidth{\\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin}{\\CLASSINPUToutersidemargin}\n \\IEEEsetsidemargin{i}{\\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin}\n \\typeout{** ATTENTION: Overriding inner side margin to \\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin\\space and \n outer side margin to \\CLASSINPUToutersidemargin\\space via \\string\\CLASSINPUT.}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% process CLASSINPUT top/bottom text margin\n% if toptext margin defined, but bottomtext margin not, set bottomtext to toptext margin\n\\ifx\\CLASSINPUTtoptextmargin\\@IEEEundefined\n\\else\n \\ifx\\CLASSINPUTbottomtextmargin\\@IEEEundefined\n \\edef\\CLASSINPUTbottomtextmargin{\\CLASSINPUTtoptextmargin}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\\ifx\\CLASSINPUTbottomtextmargin\\@IEEEundefined\n\\else\n % if bottomtext margin defined, but toptext margin not, set toptext to bottomtext margin\n \\ifx\\CLASSINPUTtoptextmargin\\@IEEEundefined\n \\edef\\CLASSINPUTtoptextmargin{\\CLASSINPUTbottomtextmargin}\n \\fi\n \\IEEEsettextheight{\\CLASSINPUTtoptextmargin}{\\CLASSINPUTbottomtextmargin}\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{t}{\\CLASSINPUTtoptextmargin}\n \\typeout{** ATTENTION: Overriding top text margin to \\CLASSINPUTtoptextmargin\\space and \n bottom text margin to \\CLASSINPUTbottomtextmargin\\space via \\string\\CLASSINPUT.}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% default to center header and footer text in the margins\n\\IEEEsetheadermargin{c}{0pt}\n\\IEEEsetfootermargin{c}{0pt}\n\n% adjust header and footer positions for compsoc journals\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONjournal\n \\IEEEsetheadermargin{b}{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}\n \\IEEEsetfootermargin{t}{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\n% V1.8a display lines per column info message on user's console\n\\def\\IEEEdisplayinfolinespercolumn{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=\\textheight\n% topskip represents only one line even if > baselineskip\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by -1\\topskip\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA=\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB=\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n\\divide\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB by \\baselineskip\n% need to add one line to include topskip (first) line\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB by 1\n% save lines per column value as text\n\\edef\\@IEEEnumlinespercolumninfotxt{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB}\n% backout topskip advance to allow direct \\@IEEEtrantmpcountA comparison\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB by -1\n% restore value as text height (without topskip) rather than just as number of lines\n\\multiply\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB by \\baselineskip\n% is the column height an integer number of lines per column?\n\\ifnum\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA=\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB\n\\edef\\@IEEEnumlinespercolumnexactinfotxt{exact}\n\\else\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA sp\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by -\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB sp\\relax\n\\edef\\@IEEEnumlinespercolumnexactinfotxt{approximate, difference = \\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\n\\fi\n\\typeout{-- Lines per column: \\@IEEEnumlinespercolumninfotxt\\space (\\@IEEEnumlinespercolumnexactinfotxt).}}\n% delay execution till start of document to allow for user changes\n\\AtBeginDocument{\\IEEEdisplayinfolinespercolumn}\n\n\n\n% LIST SPACING CONTROLS\n\n% Controls the amount of EXTRA spacing\n% above and below \\trivlist \n% Both \\list and IED lists override this.\n% However, \\trivlist will use this as will most\n% things built from \\trivlist like the \\center\n% environment.\n\\topsep 0.5\\baselineskip\n\n% Controls the additional spacing around lists preceded\n% or followed by blank lines. the IEEE does not increase\n% spacing before or after paragraphs so it is set to zero.\n% \\z@ is the same as zero, but faster.\n\\partopsep \\z@\n\n% Controls the spacing between paragraphs in lists. \n% The IEEE does not increase spacing before or after paragraphs\n% so this is also zero. \n% With IEEEtran.cls, global changes to\n% this value DO affect lists (but not IED lists).\n\\parsep \\z@\n\n% Controls the extra spacing between list items. \n% The IEEE does not put extra spacing between items.\n% With IEEEtran.cls, global changes to this value DO affect\n% lists (but not IED lists).\n\\itemsep \\z@\n\n% \\itemindent is the amount to indent the FIRST line of a list\n% item. It is auto set to zero within the \\list environment. To alter\n% it, you have to do so when you call the \\list.\n% However, the IEEE uses this for the theorem environment\n% There is an alternative value for this near \\leftmargini below\n\\itemindent -1em\n\n% \\leftmargin, the spacing from the left margin of the main text to\n% the left of the main body of a list item is set by \\list.\n% Hence this statement does nothing for lists.\n% But, quote and verse do use it for indention.\n\\leftmargin 2em\n\n% we retain this stuff from the older IEEEtran.cls so that \\list\n% will work the same way as before. However, itemize, enumerate and\n% description (IED) could care less about what these are as they\n% all are overridden.\n\\leftmargini 2em\n%\\itemindent 2em % Alternative values: sometimes used.\n%\\leftmargini 0em\n\\leftmarginii 1em\n\\leftmarginiii 1.5em\n\\leftmarginiv 1.5em\n\\leftmarginv 1.0em\n\\leftmarginvi 1.0em\n\\labelsep 0.5em \n\\labelwidth \\z@\n\n\n% The old IEEEtran.cls behavior of \\list is retained.\n% However, the new V1.3 IED list environments override all the\n% @list stuff (\\@listX is called within \\list for the\n% appropriate level just before the user's list_decl is called). \n% \\topsep is now 2pt as the IEEE puts a little extra space around\n% lists - used by those non-IED macros that depend on \\list.\n% Note that \\parsep and \\itemsep are not redefined as in \n% the sizexx.clo \\@listX (which article.cls uses) so global changes\n% of these values DO affect \\list\n% \n\\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini \\topsep 2pt plus 1pt minus 1pt}\n\\let\\@listI\\@listi\n\\def\\@listii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\\labelwidth\\leftmarginii%\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep \\topsep 2pt}\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\\labelwidth\\leftmarginiii%\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep \\topsep 2pt}\n\\def\\@listiv{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiv\\labelwidth\\leftmarginiv%\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep \\topsep 2pt}\n\\def\\@listv{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginv\\labelwidth\\leftmarginv%\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep \\topsep 2pt}\n\\def\\@listvi{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginvi\\labelwidth\\leftmarginvi%\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep \\topsep 2pt}\n\n\n% The IEEE uses 5) not 5.\n\\def\\labelenumi{\\theenumi)} \\def\\theenumi{\\arabic{enumi}}\n\n% The IEEE uses a) not (a)\n\\def\\labelenumii{\\theenumii)} \\def\\theenumii{\\alph{enumii}}\n\n% The IEEE uses iii) not iii.\n\\def\\labelenumiii{\\theenumiii)} \\def\\theenumiii{\\roman{enumiii}}\n\n% The IEEE uses A) not A.\n\\def\\labelenumiv{\\theenumiv)} \\def\\theenumiv{\\Alph{enumiv}}\n\n% exactly the same as in article.cls\n\\def\\p@enumii{\\theenumi}\n\\def\\p@enumiii{\\theenumi(\\theenumii)}\n\\def\\p@enumiv{\\p@enumiii\\theenumiii}\n\n% itemized list label styles\n\\def\\labelitemi{$\\scriptstyle\\bullet$}\n\\def\\labelitemii{\\textbf{--}}\n\\def\\labelitemiii{$\\ast$}\n\\def\\labelitemiv{$\\cdot$}\n\n\n\n% **** V1.3 ENHANCEMENTS ****\n% Itemize, Enumerate and Description (IED) List Controls\n% ***************************\n% \n% \n% The IEEE seems to use at least two different values by\n% which ITEMIZED list labels are indented to the right\n% For The Journal of Lightwave Technology (JLT) and The Journal\n% on Selected Areas in Communications (JSAC), they tend to use\n% an indention equal to \\parindent. For Transactions on Communications\n% they tend to indent ITEMIZED lists a little more--- 1.3\\parindent.\n% We'll provide both values here for you so that you can choose \n% which one you like in your document using a command such as:\n% setlength{\\IEEEilabelindent}{\\IEEEilabelindentB}\n\\newdimen\\IEEEilabelindentA\n\\IEEEilabelindentA \\parindent\n\n\\newdimen\\IEEEilabelindentB\n\\IEEEilabelindentB 1.3\\parindent\n% However, we'll default to using \\parindent\n% which makes more sense to me\n\\newdimen\\IEEEilabelindent\n\\IEEEilabelindent \\IEEEilabelindentA\n\n\n% This controls the default amount the enumerated list labels\n% are indented to the right.\n% Normally, this is the same as the paragraph indention\n\\newdimen\\IEEEelabelindent\n\\IEEEelabelindent \\parindent\n\n% This controls the default amount the description list labels\n% are indented to the right.\n% Normally, this is the same as the paragraph indention\n\\newdimen\\IEEEdlabelindent\n\\IEEEdlabelindent \\parindent\n\n% This is the value actually used within the IED lists.\n% The IED environments automatically set its value to\n% one of the three values above, so global changes do \n% not have any effect\n\\newdimen\\IEEElabelindent\n\\IEEElabelindent \\parindent\n\n% The actual amount labels will be indented is\n% \\IEEElabelindent multiplied by the factor below\n% corresponding to the level of nesting depth\n% This provides a means by which the user can\n% alter the effective \\IEEElabelindent for deeper\n% levels\n% There may not be such a thing as correct \"standard IEEE\"\n% values. What the IEEE actually does may depend on the specific\n% circumstances.\n% The first list level almost always has full indention.\n% The second levels I've seen have only 75% of the normal indentation\n% Three level or greater nestings are very rare. I am guessing\n% that they don't use any indentation.\n\\def\\IEEElabelindentfactori{1.0} % almost always one\n\\def\\IEEElabelindentfactorii{0.75} % 0.0 or 1.0 may be used in some cases\n\\def\\IEEElabelindentfactoriii{0.0} % 0.75? 0.5? 0.0?\n\\def\\IEEElabelindentfactoriv{0.0}\n\\def\\IEEElabelindentfactorv{0.0}\n\\def\\IEEElabelindentfactorvi{0.0}\n\n% value actually used within IED lists, it is auto\n% set to one of the 6 values above\n% global changes here have no effect\n\\def\\IEEElabelindentfactor{1.0}\n\n% This controls the default spacing between the end of the IED\n% list labels and the list text, when normal text is used for\n% the labels.\n% compsoc uses a larger value here, but we'll set that later\n% in the class so that this code block area can be extracted\n% as-is for IEEEtrantools.sty\n\\newdimen\\IEEEiednormlabelsep\n\\IEEEiednormlabelsep 0.6em\n\n% This controls the default spacing between the end of the IED\n% list labels and the list text, when math symbols are used for\n% the labels (nomenclature lists). The IEEE usually increases the \n% spacing in these cases\n\\newdimen\\IEEEiedmathlabelsep\n\\IEEEiedmathlabelsep 1.2em\n\n% This controls the extra vertical separation put above and\n% below each IED list. the IEEE usually puts a little extra spacing\n% around each list. However, this spacing is barely noticeable.\n% compsoc uses a larger value here, but we'll set that later\n% in the class so that this code block area can be extracted\n% as-is for IEEEtrantools.sty\n\\newskip\\IEEEiedtopsep\n\\IEEEiedtopsep 2pt plus 1pt minus 1pt\n\n\n% This command is executed within each IED list environment\n% at the beginning of the list. You can use this to set the \n% parameters for some/all your IED list(s) without disturbing \n% global parameters that affect things other than lists.\n% i.e., renewcommand{\\IEEEiedlistdecl}{\\setlength{\\labelsep}{5em}}\n% will alter the \\labelsep for the next list(s) until \n% \\IEEEiedlistdecl is redefined. \n\\def\\IEEEiedlistdecl{\\relax}\n\n% This command provides an easy way to set \\leftmargin based\n% on the \\labelwidth, \\labelsep and the argument \\IEEElabelindent\n% Usage: \\IEEEcalcleftmargin{width-to-indent-the-label}\n% output is in the \\leftmargin variable, i.e., effectively:\n% \\leftmargin = argument + \\labelwidth + \\labelsep\n% Note controlled spacing here, shield end of lines with %\n\\def\\IEEEcalcleftmargin#1{\\setlength{\\leftmargin}{#1}%\n\\addtolength{\\leftmargin}{\\labelwidth}%\n\\addtolength{\\leftmargin}{\\labelsep}}\n\n% This command provides an easy way to set \\labelwidth to the\n% width of the given text. It is the same as\n% \\settowidth{\\labelwidth}{label-text}\n% and useful as a shorter alternative.\n% Typically used to set \\labelwidth to be the width\n% of the longest label in the list\n\\def\\IEEEsetlabelwidth#1{\\settowidth{\\labelwidth}{#1}}\n\n% When this command is executed, IED lists will use the \n% IEEEiedmathlabelsep label separation rather than the normal\n% spacing. To have an effect, this command must be executed via\n% the \\IEEEiedlistdecl or within the option of the IED list\n% environments.\n\\def\\IEEEusemathlabelsep{\\setlength{\\labelsep}{\\IEEEiedmathlabelsep}}\n\n% A flag which controls whether the IED lists automatically\n% calculate \\leftmargin from \\IEEElabelindent, \\labelwidth and \\labelsep\n% Useful if you want to specify your own \\leftmargin\n% This flag must be set (\\IEEEnocalcleftmargintrue or \\IEEEnocalcleftmarginfalse) \n% via the \\IEEEiedlistdecl or within the option of the IED list\n% environments to have an effect.\n\\newif\\ifIEEEnocalcleftmargin\n\\IEEEnocalcleftmarginfalse\n\n% A flag which controls whether \\IEEElabelindent is multiplied by\n% the \\IEEElabelindentfactor for each list level.\n% This flag must be set via the \\IEEEiedlistdecl or within the option \n% of the IED list environments to have an effect.\n\\newif\\ifIEEEnolabelindentfactor\n\\IEEEnolabelindentfactorfalse\n\n\n% internal variable to indicate type of IED label\n% justification\n% 0 - left; 1 - center; 2 - right\n\\def\\@IEEEiedjustify{0}\n\n\n% commands to allow the user to control IED\n% label justifications. Use these commands within\n% the IED environment option or in the \\IEEEiedlistdecl\n% Note that changing the normal list justifications\n% is nonstandard and the IEEE may not like it if you do so!\n% I include these commands as they may be helpful to\n% those who are using these enhanced list controls for\n% other non-IEEE related LaTeX work.\n% itemize and enumerate automatically default to right\n% justification, description defaults to left.\n\\def\\IEEEiedlabeljustifyl{\\def\\@IEEEiedjustify{0}}%left\n\\def\\IEEEiedlabeljustifyc{\\def\\@IEEEiedjustify{1}}%center\n\\def\\IEEEiedlabeljustifyr{\\def\\@IEEEiedjustify{2}}%right\n\n\n\n\n% commands to save to and restore from the list parameter copies\n% this allows us to set all the list parameters within\n% the list_decl and prevent \\list (and its \\@list) \n% from overriding any of our parameters\n% V1.6 use \\edefs instead of dimen's to conserve dimen registers\n% Note controlled spacing here, shield end of lines with %\n\\def\\@IEEEsavelistparams{\\edef\\@IEEEiedtopsep{\\the\\topsep}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEiedlabelwidth{\\the\\labelwidth}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEiedlabelsep{\\the\\labelsep}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEiedleftmargin{\\the\\leftmargin}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEiedpartopsep{\\the\\partopsep}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEiedparsep{\\the\\parsep}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEieditemsep{\\the\\itemsep}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEiedrightmargin{\\the\\rightmargin}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEiedlistparindent{\\the\\listparindent}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEieditemindent{\\the\\itemindent}}\n\n% Note controlled spacing here\n\\def\\@IEEErestorelistparams{\\topsep\\@IEEEiedtopsep\\relax%\n\\labelwidth\\@IEEEiedlabelwidth\\relax%\n\\labelsep\\@IEEEiedlabelsep\\relax%\n\\leftmargin\\@IEEEiedleftmargin\\relax%\n\\partopsep\\@IEEEiedpartopsep\\relax%\n\\parsep\\@IEEEiedparsep\\relax%\n\\itemsep\\@IEEEieditemsep\\relax%\n\\rightmargin\\@IEEEiedrightmargin\\relax%\n\\listparindent\\@IEEEiedlistparindent\\relax%\n\\itemindent\\@IEEEieditemindent\\relax}\n\n\n% v1.6b provide original LaTeX IED list environments\n% note that latex.ltx defines \\itemize and \\enumerate, but not \\description\n% which must be created by the base classes\n% save original LaTeX itemize and enumerate\n\\let\\LaTeXitemize\\itemize\n\\let\\endLaTeXitemize\\enditemize\n\\let\\LaTeXenumerate\\enumerate\n\\let\\endLaTeXenumerate\\endenumerate\n\n% provide original LaTeX description environment from article.cls\n\\newenvironment{LaTeXdescription}\n {\\list{}{\\labelwidth\\z@ \\itemindent-\\leftmargin\n \\let\\makelabel\\descriptionlabel}}\n {\\endlist}\n\\newcommand*\\descriptionlabel[1]{\\hspace\\labelsep\n \\normalfont\\bfseries #1}\n\n\n% override LaTeX's default IED lists\n\\def\\itemize{\\@IEEEitemize}\n\\def\\enditemize{\\@endIEEEitemize}\n\\def\\enumerate{\\@IEEEenumerate}\n\\def\\endenumerate{\\@endIEEEenumerate}\n\\def\\description{\\@IEEEdescription}\n\\def\\enddescription{\\@endIEEEdescription}\n\n% provide the user with aliases - may help those using packages that\n% override itemize, enumerate, or description\n\\def\\IEEEitemize{\\@IEEEitemize}\n\\def\\endIEEEitemize{\\@endIEEEitemize}\n\\def\\IEEEenumerate{\\@IEEEenumerate}\n\\def\\endIEEEenumerate{\\@endIEEEenumerate}\n\\def\\IEEEdescription{\\@IEEEdescription}\n\\def\\endIEEEdescription{\\@endIEEEdescription}\n\n\n% V1.6 we want to keep the IEEEtran IED list definitions as our own internal\n% commands so they are protected against redefinition\n\\def\\@IEEEitemize{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEitemize}{\\@@IEEEitemize[\\relax]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEenumerate{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEenumerate}{\\@@IEEEenumerate[\\relax]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEdescription{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEdescription}{\\@@IEEEdescription[\\relax]}}\n\\def\\@endIEEEitemize{\\endlist}\n\\def\\@endIEEEenumerate{\\endlist}\n\\def\\@endIEEEdescription{\\endlist}\n\n\n% DO NOT ALLOW BLANK LINES TO BE IN THESE IED ENVIRONMENTS\n% AS THIS WILL FORCE NEW PARAGRAPHS AFTER THE IED LISTS\n% IEEEtran itemized list MDS 1/2001\n% Note controlled spacing here, shield end of lines with %\n\\def\\@@IEEEitemize[#1]{%\n \\ifnum\\@itemdepth>3\\relax\\@toodeep\\else%\n \\ifnum\\@listdepth>5\\relax\\@toodeep\\else%\n \\advance\\@itemdepth\\@ne%\n \\edef\\@itemitem{labelitem\\romannumeral\\the\\@itemdepth}%\n % get the IEEElabelindentfactor for this level\n \\advance\\@listdepth\\@ne% we need to know what the level WILL be\n \\edef\\IEEElabelindentfactor{\\csname IEEElabelindentfactor\\romannumeral\\the\\@listdepth\\endcsname}%\n \\advance\\@listdepth-\\@ne% undo our increment\n \\def\\@IEEEiedjustify{2}% right justified labels are default\n % set other defaults\n \\IEEEnocalcleftmarginfalse%\n \\IEEEnolabelindentfactorfalse%\n \\topsep\\IEEEiedtopsep%\n \\IEEElabelindent\\IEEEilabelindent%\n \\labelsep\\IEEEiednormlabelsep%\n \\partopsep 0ex%\n \\parsep 0ex%\n \\itemsep 0ex%\n \\rightmargin 0em%\n \\listparindent 0em%\n \\itemindent 0em%\n % calculate the label width\n % the user can override this later if\n % they specified a \\labelwidth\n \\settowidth{\\labelwidth}{\\csname labelitem\\romannumeral\\the\\@itemdepth\\endcsname}%\n \\@IEEEsavelistparams% save our list parameters\n \\list{\\csname\\@itemitem\\endcsname}{%\n \\@IEEErestorelistparams% override any list{} changes\n % to our globals\n \\let\\makelabel\\@IEEEiedmakelabel% v1.6b setup \\makelabel\n \\IEEEiedlistdecl% let user alter parameters\n #1\\relax%\n % If the user has requested not to use the\n % IEEElabelindent factor, don't revise \\IEEElabelindent\n \\ifIEEEnolabelindentfactor\\relax%\n \\else\\IEEElabelindent=\\IEEElabelindentfactor\\IEEElabelindent%\n \\fi%\n % Unless the user has requested otherwise,\n % calculate our left margin based\n % on \\IEEElabelindent, \\labelwidth and\n % \\labelsep\n \\ifIEEEnocalcleftmargin\\relax%\n \\else\\IEEEcalcleftmargin{\\IEEElabelindent}%\n \\fi}\\fi\\fi}%\n\n\n% DO NOT ALLOW BLANK LINES TO BE IN THESE IED ENVIRONMENTS\n% AS THIS WILL FORCE NEW PARAGRAPHS AFTER THE IED LISTS\n% IEEEtran enumerate list MDS 1/2001\n% Note controlled spacing here, shield end of lines with %\n\\def\\@@IEEEenumerate[#1]{%\n \\ifnum\\@enumdepth>3\\relax\\@toodeep\\else%\n \\ifnum\\@listdepth>5\\relax\\@toodeep\\else%\n \\advance\\@enumdepth\\@ne%\n \\edef\\@enumctr{enum\\romannumeral\\the\\@enumdepth}%\n % get the IEEElabelindentfactor for this level\n \\advance\\@listdepth\\@ne% we need to know what the level WILL be\n \\edef\\IEEElabelindentfactor{\\csname IEEElabelindentfactor\\romannumeral\\the\\@listdepth\\endcsname}%\n \\advance\\@listdepth-\\@ne% undo our increment\n \\def\\@IEEEiedjustify{2}% right justified labels are default\n % set other defaults\n \\IEEEnocalcleftmarginfalse%\n \\IEEEnolabelindentfactorfalse%\n \\topsep\\IEEEiedtopsep%\n \\IEEElabelindent\\IEEEelabelindent%\n \\labelsep\\IEEEiednormlabelsep%\n \\partopsep 0ex%\n \\parsep 0ex%\n \\itemsep 0ex%\n \\rightmargin 0em%\n \\listparindent 0em%\n \\itemindent 0em%\n % calculate the label width\n % We'll set it to the width suitable for all labels using\n % normalfont 1) to 9)\n % The user can override this later\n \\settowidth{\\labelwidth}{9)}%\n \\@IEEEsavelistparams% save our list parameters\n \\list{\\csname label\\@enumctr\\endcsname}{\\usecounter{\\@enumctr}%\n \\@IEEErestorelistparams% override any list{} changes\n % to our globals\n \\let\\makelabel\\@IEEEiedmakelabel% v1.6b setup \\makelabel\n \\IEEEiedlistdecl% let user alter parameters \n #1\\relax%\n % If the user has requested not to use the\n % IEEElabelindent factor, don't revise \\IEEElabelindent\n \\ifIEEEnolabelindentfactor\\relax%\n \\else\\IEEElabelindent=\\IEEElabelindentfactor\\IEEElabelindent%\n \\fi%\n % Unless the user has requested otherwise,\n % calculate our left margin based\n % on \\IEEElabelindent, \\labelwidth and\n % \\labelsep\n \\ifIEEEnocalcleftmargin\\relax%\n \\else\\IEEEcalcleftmargin{\\IEEElabelindent}%\n \\fi}\\fi\\fi}%\n\n\n% DO NOT ALLOW BLANK LINES TO BE IN THESE IED ENVIRONMENTS\n% AS THIS WILL FORCE NEW PARAGRAPHS AFTER THE IED LISTS\n% IEEEtran description list MDS 1/2001\n% Note controlled spacing here, shield end of lines with %\n\\def\\@@IEEEdescription[#1]{%\n \\ifnum\\@listdepth>5\\relax\\@toodeep\\else%\n % get the IEEElabelindentfactor for this level\n \\advance\\@listdepth\\@ne% we need to know what the level WILL be\n \\edef\\IEEElabelindentfactor{\\csname IEEElabelindentfactor\\romannumeral\\the\\@listdepth\\endcsname}%\n \\advance\\@listdepth-\\@ne% undo our increment\n \\def\\@IEEEiedjustify{0}% left justified labels are default\n % set other defaults\n \\IEEEnocalcleftmarginfalse%\n \\IEEEnolabelindentfactorfalse%\n \\topsep\\IEEEiedtopsep% \n \\IEEElabelindent\\IEEEdlabelindent%\n % assume normal labelsep\n \\labelsep\\IEEEiednormlabelsep%\n \\partopsep 0ex%\n \\parsep 0ex%\n \\itemsep 0ex%\n \\rightmargin 0em%\n \\listparindent 0em%\n \\itemindent 0em%\n % Bogus label width in case the user forgets\n % to set it.\n % TIP: If you want to see what a variable's width is you\n % can use the TeX command \\showthe\\width-variable to \n % display it on the screen during compilation \n % (This might be helpful to know when you need to find out\n % which label is the widest)\n \\settowidth{\\labelwidth}{Hello}%\n \\@IEEEsavelistparams% save our list parameters\n \\list{}{\\@IEEErestorelistparams% override any list{} changes\n % to our globals\n \\let\\makelabel\\@IEEEiedmakelabel% v1.6b setup \\makelabel\n \\IEEEiedlistdecl% let user alter parameters \n #1\\relax%\n % If the user has requested not to use the\n % labelindent factor, don't revise \\IEEElabelindent\n \\ifIEEEnolabelindentfactor\\relax%\n \\else\\IEEElabelindent=\\IEEElabelindentfactor\\IEEElabelindent%\n \\fi%\n % Unless the user has requested otherwise,\n % calculate our left margin based\n % on \\IEEElabelindent, \\labelwidth and\n % \\labelsep\n \\ifIEEEnocalcleftmargin\\relax%\n \\else\\IEEEcalcleftmargin{\\IEEElabelindent}\\relax%\n \\fi}\\fi}\n\n% v1.6b we use one makelabel that does justification as needed.\n\\def\\@IEEEiedmakelabel#1{\\relax\\if\\@IEEEiedjustify 0\\relax\n\\makebox[\\labelwidth][l]{\\normalfont #1}\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEiedjustify 1\\relax\n\\makebox[\\labelwidth][c]{\\normalfont #1}\\else\n\\makebox[\\labelwidth][r]{\\normalfont #1}\\fi\\fi}\n\n\n% compsoc uses a larger value for the normal labelsep\n% and also extra spacing above and below each list\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\IEEEiednormlabelsep 1.2em\n \\IEEEiedtopsep 6pt plus 3pt minus 3pt\n\\fi\n\n\n% VERSE and QUOTE\n% V1.7 define environments with newenvironment\n\\newenvironment{verse}{\\let\\\\=\\@centercr\n \\list{}{\\itemsep\\z@ \\itemindent -1.5em \\listparindent \\itemindent\n \\rightmargin\\leftmargin\\advance\\leftmargin 1.5em}\\item\\relax}\n {\\endlist}\n\\newenvironment{quotation}{\\list{}{\\listparindent 1.5em \\itemindent\\listparindent\n \\rightmargin\\leftmargin \\parsep 0pt plus 1pt}\\item\\relax}\n {\\endlist}\n\\newenvironment{quote}{\\list{}{\\rightmargin\\leftmargin}\\item\\relax}\n {\\endlist}\n\n\n% \\titlepage\n% provided only for backward compatibility. \\maketitle is the correct\n% way to create the title page. \n\\def\\titlepage{\\@restonecolfalse\\if@twocolumn\\@restonecoltrue\\onecolumn\n \\else \\newpage \\fi \\thispagestyle{empty}\\c@page\\z@}\n\\def\\endtitlepage{\\if@restonecol\\twocolumn \\else \\newpage \\fi}\n\n% standard values from article.cls\n\\arraycolsep 5pt\n\\arrayrulewidth .4pt\n\\doublerulesep 2pt\n\n\\tabcolsep 6pt\n\\tabbingsep 0.5em\n\n\n%% FOOTNOTES\n%\n%\\skip\\footins 10pt plus 4pt minus 2pt\n% V1.6 respond to changes in font size\n% space added above the footnotes (if present)\n\\skip\\footins 0.9\\baselineskip plus 0.4\\baselineskip minus 0.2\\baselineskip\n\n% V1.6, we need to make \\footnotesep responsive to changes\n% in \\baselineskip or strange spacings will result when in\n% draft mode. Here is a little LaTeX secret - \\footnotesep\n% determines the height of an invisible strut that is placed\n% *above* the baseline of footnotes after the first. Since\n% LaTeX considers the space for characters to be 0.7\\baselineskip\n% above the baseline and 0.3\\baselineskip below it, we need to\n% use 0.7\\baselineskip as a \\footnotesep to maintain equal spacing\n% between all the lines of the footnotes. The IEEE often uses a tad\n% more, so use 0.8\\baselineskip. This slightly larger value also helps\n% the text to clear the footnote marks. Note that \\thanks in IEEEtran\n% uses its own value of \\footnotesep which is set in \\maketitle.\n{\\footnotesize\n\\global\\footnotesep 0.8\\baselineskip}\n\n\n\\skip\\@mpfootins = \\skip\\footins\n\\fboxsep = 3pt\n\\fboxrule = .4pt\n% V1.6 use 1em, then use LaTeX2e's \\@makefnmark\n% Note that the IEEE normally *left* aligns the footnote marks, so we don't need\n% box resizing tricks here.\n\\long\\def\\@makefntext#1{\\parindent 1em\\indent\\hbox{\\@makefnmark}#1}% V1.6 use 1em\n% V1.7 compsoc does not use superscipts for footnote marks\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\def\\@IEEEcompsocmakefnmark{\\hbox{\\normalfont\\@thefnmark.\\ }}\n\\long\\def\\@makefntext#1{\\parindent 1em\\indent\\hbox{\\@IEEEcompsocmakefnmark}#1}\n\\fi\n\n% The IEEE does not use footnote rules\n\\def\\footnoterule{}\n\n% V1.7 for compsoc, the IEEE uses a footnote rule only for \\thanks. We devise a \"one-shot\"\n% system to implement this.\n\\newif\\if@IEEEenableoneshotfootnoterule\n\\@IEEEenableoneshotfootnoterulefalse\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\def\\footnoterule{\\relax\\if@IEEEenableoneshotfootnoterule\n\\kern-5pt\n\\hbox to \\columnwidth{\\hfill\\vrule width 0.5\\columnwidth height 0.4pt\\hfill}\n\\kern4.6pt\n\\global\\@IEEEenableoneshotfootnoterulefalse\n\\else\n\\relax\n\\fi}\n\\fi\n\n% V1.6 do not allow LaTeX to break a footnote across multiple pages\n\\interfootnotelinepenalty=10000\n\n% V1.6 discourage breaks within equations\n% Note that amsmath normally sets this to 10000,\n% but LaTeX2e normally uses 100.\n\\interdisplaylinepenalty=2500\n\n% default allows section depth up to /paragraph\n\\setcounter{secnumdepth}{4}\n\n% technotes do not allow /paragraph\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote\n \\setcounter{secnumdepth}{3}\n\\fi\n% neither do compsoc conferences\n\\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\setcounter{secnumdepth}{3}}\n\n\n\\newcounter{section}\n\\newcounter{subsection}[section]\n\\newcounter{subsubsection}[subsection]\n\\newcounter{paragraph}[subsubsection]\n\n% used only by IEEEtran's IEEEeqnarray as other packages may\n% have their own, different, implementations\n\\newcounter{IEEEsubequation}[equation]\n\n% as shown when called by user from \\ref, \\label and in table of contents\n\\def\\theequation{\\arabic{equation}} % 1\n\\def\\theIEEEsubequation{\\theequation\\alph{IEEEsubequation}} % 1a (used only by IEEEtran's IEEEeqnarray)\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n% compsoc is all arabic\n\\def\\thesection{\\arabic{section}} \n\\def\\thesubsection{\\thesection.\\arabic{subsection}}\n\\def\\thesubsubsection{\\thesubsection.\\arabic{subsubsection}}\n\\def\\theparagraph{\\thesubsubsection.\\arabic{paragraph}}\n\\else\n\\def\\thesection{\\Roman{section}} % I\n% V1.7, \\mbox prevents breaks around - \n\\def\\thesubsection{\\mbox{\\thesection-\\Alph{subsection}}} % I-A\n% V1.7 use I-A1 format used by the IEEE rather than I-A.1\n\\def\\thesubsubsection{\\thesubsection\\arabic{subsubsection}} % I-A1\n\\def\\theparagraph{\\thesubsubsection\\alph{paragraph}} % I-A1a\n\\fi\n\n% From Heiko Oberdiek. Because of the \\mbox in \\thesubsection, we need to\n% tell hyperref to disable the \\mbox command when making PDF bookmarks.\n% This done already with hyperref.sty version 6.74o and later, but\n% it will not hurt to do it here again for users of older versions.\n\\@ifundefined{pdfstringdefPreHook}{\\let\\pdfstringdefPreHook\\@empty}{}%\n\\g@addto@macro\\pdfstringdefPreHook{\\let\\mbox\\relax}\n\n\n% Main text forms (how shown in main text headings)\n% V1.6, using \\thesection in \\thesectiondis allows changes\n% in the former to automatically appear in the latter\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONconference% compsoc conference\n \\def\\thesectiondis{\\thesection.}\n \\def\\thesubsectiondis{\\thesectiondis\\arabic{subsection}.}\n \\def\\thesubsubsectiondis{\\thesubsectiondis\\arabic{subsubsection}.}\n \\def\\theparagraphdis{\\thesubsubsectiondis\\arabic{paragraph}.}\n \\else% compsoc not conferencs\n \\def\\thesectiondis{\\thesection}\n \\def\\thesubsectiondis{\\thesectiondis.\\arabic{subsection}}\n \\def\\thesubsubsectiondis{\\thesubsectiondis.\\arabic{subsubsection}}\n \\def\\theparagraphdis{\\thesubsubsectiondis.\\arabic{paragraph}}\n \\fi\n\\else% not compsoc\n \\def\\thesectiondis{\\thesection.} % I.\n \\def\\thesubsectiondis{\\Alph{subsection}.} % B.\n \\def\\thesubsubsectiondis{\\arabic{subsubsection})} % 3)\n \\def\\theparagraphdis{\\alph{paragraph})} % d)\n\\fi\n\n% just like LaTeX2e's \\@eqnnum\n\\def\\theequationdis{{\\normalfont \\normalcolor (\\theequation)}}% (1)\n% IEEEsubequation used only by IEEEtran's IEEEeqnarray\n\\def\\theIEEEsubequationdis{{\\normalfont \\normalcolor (\\theIEEEsubequation)}}% (1a)\n% redirect LaTeX2e's equation number display and all that depend on\n% it, through IEEEtran's \\theequationdis\n\\def\\@eqnnum{\\theequationdis}\n\n\n\n% V1.7 provide string macros as article.cls does\n\\def\\contentsname{Contents}\n\\def\\listfigurename{List of Figures}\n\\def\\listtablename{List of Tables}\n\\def\\refname{References}\n\\def\\indexname{Index}\n\\def\\figurename{Fig.}\n\\def\\tablename{TABLE}\n\\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\def\\figurename{Figure}}\n\\def\\partname{Part}\n\\def\\appendixname{Appendix}\n\\def\\abstractname{Abstract}\n% IEEE specific names\n\\def\\IEEEkeywordsname{Index Terms}\n\\def\\IEEEproofname{Proof}\n\n\n% LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES AND TABLE OF CONTENTS\n%\n\\def\\@pnumwidth{1.55em}\n\\def\\@tocrmarg{2.55em}\n\\def\\@dotsep{4.5}\n\\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}\n\n% adjusted some spacings here so that section numbers will not easily \n% collide with the section titles. \n% VIII; VIII-A; and VIII-A.1 are usually the worst offenders.\n% MDS 1/2001\n\\def\\tableofcontents{\\section*{\\contentsname}\\@starttoc{toc}}\n\\def\\l@section#1#2{\\addpenalty{\\@secpenalty}\\addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}%\n \\@tempdima 2.75em \\begingroup \\parindent \\z@ \\rightskip \\@pnumwidth%\n \\parfillskip-\\@pnumwidth {\\bfseries\\leavevmode #1}\\hfil\\hbox to\\@pnumwidth{\\hss #2}\\par%\n \\endgroup}\n% argument format #1:level, #2:labelindent,#3:labelsep\n\\def\\l@subsection{\\@dottedtocline{2}{2.75em}{3.75em}}\n\\def\\l@subsubsection{\\@dottedtocline{3}{6.5em}{4.5em}}\n% must provide \\l@ defs for ALL sublevels EVEN if tocdepth\n% is such as they will not appear in the table of contents\n% these defs are how TOC knows what level these things are!\n\\def\\l@paragraph{\\@dottedtocline{4}{6.5em}{5.5em}}\n\\def\\l@subparagraph{\\@dottedtocline{5}{6.5em}{6.5em}}\n\\def\\listoffigures{\\section*{\\listfigurename}\\@starttoc{lof}}\n\\def\\l@figure{\\@dottedtocline{1}{0em}{2.75em}}\n\\def\\listoftables{\\section*{\\listtablename}\\@starttoc{lot}}\n\\let\\l@table\\l@figure\n\n\n% Definitions for floats\n%\n% Normal Floats\n% V1.8 floatsep et al. revised down by 0.15\\baselineskip\n% to account for the sideeffects of \\topskip compensation\n\\floatsep 0.85\\baselineskip plus 0.2\\baselineskip minus 0.2\\baselineskip\n\\textfloatsep 1.55\\baselineskip plus 0.2\\baselineskip minus 0.4\\baselineskip\n\\@fptop 0pt plus 1fil\n\\@fpsep 0.75\\baselineskip plus 2fil\n\\@fpbot 0pt plus 1fil\n\\def\\topfraction{0.9}\n\\def\\bottomfraction{0.4}\n\\def\\floatpagefraction{0.8}\n% V1.7, let top floats approach 90% of page\n\\def\\textfraction{0.1}\n\n% Double Column Floats\n\\dblfloatsep 0.85\\baselineskip plus 0.2\\baselineskip minus 0.2\\baselineskip\n\n\\dbltextfloatsep 1.55\\baselineskip plus 0.2\\baselineskip minus 0.4\\baselineskip\n% Note that it would be nice if the rubber here actually worked in LaTeX2e.\n% There is a long standing limitation in LaTeX, first discovered (to the best\n% of my knowledge) by Alan Jeffrey in 1992. LaTeX ignores the stretchable\n% portion of \\dbltextfloatsep, and as a result, double column figures can and\n% do result in an non-integer number of lines in the main text columns with\n% underfull vbox errors as a consequence. A post to comp.text.tex\n% by Donald Arseneau confirms that this had not yet been fixed in 1998.\n% IEEEtran V1.6 will fix this problem for you in the titles, but it doesn't\n% protect you from other double floats. Happy vspace'ing.\n\n\\@dblfptop 0pt plus 1fil\n\\@dblfpsep 0.75\\baselineskip plus 2fil\n\\@dblfpbot 0pt plus 1fil\n\\def\\dbltopfraction{0.8}\n\\def\\dblfloatpagefraction{0.8}\n\\setcounter{dbltopnumber}{4}\n\n\\intextsep 0.85\\baselineskip plus 0.2\\baselineskip minus 0.2\\baselineskip\n\\setcounter{topnumber}{2}\n\\setcounter{bottomnumber}{2}\n\\setcounter{totalnumber}{4}\n\n\n\n% article class provides these, we should too.\n\\newlength\\abovecaptionskip\n\\newlength\\belowcaptionskip\n% but only \\abovecaptionskip is used above figure captions and *below* table\n% captions\n\\setlength\\abovecaptionskip{0.5\\baselineskip}\n% compsoc journals are a little more generous\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\\ifCLASSOPTIONjournal\n \\setlength\\abovecaptionskip{0.75\\baselineskip}\n\\fi\\fi\n\\setlength\\belowcaptionskip{0pt}\n% V1.6 create hooks in case the caption spacing ever needs to be\n% overridden by a user\n\\def\\@IEEEfigurecaptionsepspace{\\vskip\\abovecaptionskip\\relax}%\n\\def\\@IEEEtablecaptionsepspace{\\vskip\\abovecaptionskip\\relax}%\n\n\n% 1.6b revise caption system so that \\@makecaption uses two arguments\n% as with LaTeX2e. Otherwise, there will be problems when using hyperref.\n\\def\\@IEEEtablestring{table}\n\n\n% V1.8 compensate for \\topskip so top of top figures align with tops of the first lines of main text\n% here we calculate a space equal to the amount \\topskip exceeds the main text height\n% we hook in at \\@floatboxreset\n\\def\\@IEEEfiguretopskipspace{\\ifdim\\prevdepth=-1000pt\\relax\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{1\\topskip}\\relax\n\\addtolength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{-0.7\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}\\relax\n\\vspace*{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\fi}\n% V1.8 compensate for \\topskip at the top of top tables so caption text is on main text baseline\n% use a strut set on the caption baseline within \\@makecaption\n\\def\\@IEEEtabletopskipstrut{\\ifdim\\prevdepth=-1000pt\\rule{0pt}{\\topskip}\\fi}\n% the \\ifdim\\prevdepth checks are always expected to be true for IEEE style float caption ordering\n% because top of figure content and top of captions in tables is the first thing on the vertical\n% list of these floats\n% thanks to Donald Arseneau for his 2000/11/11 post \"Re: caption hacking\" with info on this topic.\n\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n% V1.7 compsoc \\@makecaption\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference% compsoc conference\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{%\n% test if is a for a figure or table\n\\ifx\\@captype\\@IEEEtablestring%\n% if a table, do table caption\n\\footnotesize\\bgroup\\par\\centering\\@IEEEtabletopskipstrut{\\normalfont\\footnotesize {#1.}\\nobreakspace\\scshape #2}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup%\n\\@IEEEtablecaptionsepspace\n% if not a table, format it as a figure\n\\else\n\\@IEEEfigurecaptionsepspace\n\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{\\normalfont\\footnotesize {#1.}\\nobreakspace #2}%\n\\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize%\n% if caption is longer than a line, let it wrap around\n\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{\\normalfont\\footnotesize {#1.}\\nobreakspace}%\n\\parbox[t]{\\hsize}{\\normalfont\\footnotesize \\noindent\\unhbox\\@tempboxa#2}%\n% if caption is shorter than a line, center\n\\else%\n\\hbox to\\hsize{\\normalfont\\footnotesize\\hfil\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n\\fi\\fi}\n%\n\\else% nonconference compsoc\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{%\n% test if is a for a figure or table\n\\ifx\\@captype\\@IEEEtablestring%\n% if a table, do table caption\n\\footnotesize\\bgroup\\par\\centering\\@IEEEtabletopskipstrut{\\normalfont\\sffamily\\footnotesize #1}\\\\{\\normalfont\\sffamily\\footnotesize #2}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup%\n\\@IEEEtablecaptionsepspace\n% if not a table, format it as a figure\n\\else\n\\@IEEEfigurecaptionsepspace\n\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{\\normalfont\\sffamily\\footnotesize {#1.}\\nobreakspace #2}%\n\\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize%\n% if caption is longer than a line, let it wrap around\n\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{\\normalfont\\sffamily\\footnotesize {#1.}\\nobreakspace}%\n\\parbox[t]{\\hsize}{\\normalfont\\sffamily\\footnotesize \\noindent\\unhbox\\@tempboxa#2}%\n% if caption is shorter than a line, left justify\n\\else%\n\\hbox to\\hsize{\\normalfont\\sffamily\\footnotesize\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n\\fi\\fi}\n\\fi\n%\n\\else% traditional noncompsoc \\@makecaption\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{%\n% test if is a for a figure or table\n\\ifx\\@captype\\@IEEEtablestring%\n% if a table, do table caption\n\\footnotesize\\bgroup\\par\\centering\\@IEEEtabletopskipstrut{\\normalfont\\footnotesize #1}\\\\{\\normalfont\\footnotesize\\scshape #2}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup%\n\\@IEEEtablecaptionsepspace\n% if not a table, format it as a figure\n\\else\n\\@IEEEfigurecaptionsepspace\n% 3/2001 use footnotesize, not small; use two nonbreaking spaces, not one\n\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{\\normalfont\\footnotesize {#1.}\\nobreakspace\\nobreakspace #2}%\n\\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize%\n% if caption is longer than a line, let it wrap around\n\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{\\normalfont\\footnotesize {#1.}\\nobreakspace\\nobreakspace}%\n\\parbox[t]{\\hsize}{\\normalfont\\footnotesize\\noindent\\unhbox\\@tempboxa#2}%\n% if caption is shorter than a line, center if conference, left justify otherwise\n\\else%\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference \\hbox to\\hsize{\\normalfont\\footnotesize\\hfil\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n\\else \\hbox to\\hsize{\\normalfont\\footnotesize\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n\\fi\\fi\\fi}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% V1.7 disable captions class option, do so in a way that retains operation of \\label\n% within \\caption\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcaptionsoff\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{\\vspace*{2em}\\footnotesize\\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering{\\footnotesize #1}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup%\n\\let\\@IEEEtemporiglabeldefsave\\label\n\\let\\@IEEEtemplabelargsave\\relax\n\\def\\label##1{\\gdef\\@IEEEtemplabelargsave{##1}}%\n\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{#2}%\n\\let\\label\\@IEEEtemporiglabeldefsave\n\\ifx\\@IEEEtemplabelargsave\\relax\\else\\label{\\@IEEEtemplabelargsave}\\fi}\n\\fi\n\n\n% V1.7 define end environments with \\def not \\let so as to work OK with\n% preview-latex\n\\newcounter{figure}\n\\def\\thefigure{\\@arabic\\c@figure}\n\\def\\fps@figure{tbp}\n\\def\\ftype@figure{1}\n\\def\\ext@figure{lof}\n\\def\\fnum@figure{\\figurename\\nobreakspace\\thefigure}\n% V1.8 within figures add \\@IEEEfiguretopskipspace compensation to LaTeX2e's \\@floatboxreset\n\\def\\figure{\\def\\@floatboxreset{\\reset@font\\normalsize\\@setminipage\\@IEEEfiguretopskipspace}\\@float{figure}}\n\\def\\endfigure{\\end@float}\n% V1.8 also add \\@IEEEfiguretopskipspace compensation to \\figure*\n\\@namedef{figure*}{\\def\\@floatboxreset{\\reset@font\\normalsize\\@setminipage\\@IEEEfiguretopskipspace}\\@dblfloat{figure}}\n\\@namedef{endfigure*}{\\end@dblfloat}\n\n\\newcounter{table}\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\def\\thetable{\\arabic{table}}\n\\else\n\\def\\thetable{\\@Roman\\c@table}\n\\fi\n\\def\\fps@table{tbp}\n\\def\\ftype@table{2}\n\\def\\ext@table{lot}\n\\def\\fnum@table{\\tablename\\nobreakspace\\thetable}\n% V1.6 The IEEE uses 8pt text for tables\n% within tables alter LaTeX2e's \\@floatboxreset to use \\footnotesize\n\\def\\table{\\def\\@floatboxreset{\\reset@font\\footnotesize\\@setminipage}\\@float{table}}\n\\def\\endtable{\\end@float}\n% v1.6b double column tables need to default to footnotesize as well.\n\\@namedef{table*}{\\def\\@floatboxreset{\\reset@font\\footnotesize\\@setminipage}\\@dblfloat{table}}\n\\@namedef{endtable*}{\\end@dblfloat}\n\n\n\n\n%% -- Command Argument Scanning Support Functions --\n%% V1.8a \n\n% usage: \\@IEEEstripouterbraces*{}\n% \\@IEEEstripouterbraces fully expands its argument (which it then stores\n% in \\@IEEEstripouterbracesarg) via \\edef, then removes any outer enclosing\n% braces, and finally stores the result in the macro\n% \\@IEEEstrippedouterbraces.\n%\n% For example:\n% \\@IEEEstripouterbraces{{{{ab}c}}}\n% results in:\n%\n% \\@IEEEstripouterbracesarg ==> a macro containing {{{ab}c}}\n% \\@IEEEstrippedouterbraces ==> a macro containing {ab}c\n%\n% the *-star form,\\@IEEEstripouterbraces*, does not expand the argument\n% contents during processing\n\\def\\@IEEEstripouterbraces{\\@ifstar{\\let\\@IEEEstripouterbracesdef=\\def\\@@IEEEstripouterbraces}{\\let\\@IEEEstripouterbracesdef=\\edef\\@@IEEEstripouterbraces}}\n\n\\def\\@@IEEEstripouterbraces#1{\\@IEEEstripouterbracesdef\\@IEEEstripouterbracesarg{#1}\\relax\n% If the macro is unchanged after being acquired as a single delimited\n% argument, we know we have one sequence of tokens without any enclosing\n% braces. Loop until this is true.\n\\loop\n \\expandafter\\@@@IEEEstripouterbraces\\@IEEEstripouterbracesarg\\@IEEEgeneralsequenceDELIMITER\n\\ifx\\@IEEEstrippedouterbraces\\@IEEEstripouterbracesarg\n\\else\n \\let\\@IEEEstripouterbracesarg\\@IEEEstrippedouterbraces\n\\repeat}\n\n\\def\\@@@IEEEstripouterbraces#1\\@IEEEgeneralsequenceDELIMITER{\\def\\@IEEEstrippedouterbraces{#1}}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\@IEEEextractgroup*{}\n% \\@IEEEextractgroup fully expands its argument (which it then stores in\n% \\@IEEEextractgrouparg) via \\edef and then assigns the first \"brace group\"\n% of tokens to the macro \\@IEEEextractedgroup.\n% The remaining groups, if any, are stored in the macro\n% \\@IEEEextractedgroupremain. If the argument does not contain the requisite\n% groups, the respective macros will be defined to be empty.\n% There is an asymmetry in that \\@IEEEextractedgroup is stripped of its first\n% outer grouping while \\@IEEEextractedgroupremain retains even the outer\n% grouping (if present) that originally identified it as a group.\n%\n% For example:\n% \\@IEEEextractgroup{{{ab}}{c{de}}}\n% results in:\n%\n% \\@IEEEextractgrouparg ==> a macro containing {{ab}}{c{de}}\n% \\@IEEEextractedgroup ==> a macro containing {ab}\n% \\@IEEEextractedgroupremain ==> a macro containing {c{de}}\n%\n% The *-star form, \\@IEEEextractgroup*, does not expand its argument\n% contents during processing.\n\\def\\@IEEEextractgroup{\\@ifstar{\\let\\@IEEEextractgroupdef=\\def\\@@IEEEextractgroup}{\\let\\@IEEEextractgroupdef=\\edef\\@@IEEEextractgroup}}\n\n\\def\\@@IEEEextractgroup#1{\\@IEEEextractgroupdef\\@IEEEextractgrouparg{#1}\\relax\n% trap the case of an empty extracted group as this would cause problems with\n% \\@IEEEextractgroupremain's argument acquisition\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractgrouparg\\@empty\n \\def\\@IEEEextractedgroup{}\\relax\n \\def\\@IEEEextractedgroupremain{}\\relax\n\\else\n % We have to use some dirty tricks here. We want to insert {} around\n % whatever remains after the first group so that TeX's argument scanner\n % will preserve any originally enclosing braces as well as provide an\n % empty argument to acquire even if there isn't a second group.\n % In this first of two dirty tricks, we put a } at the end of the structure\n % we are going to extract from. The \\ifnum0=`{\\fi keeps TeX happy to allow\n % what would otherwise be an unbalanced macro definition for\n % \\@@IEEEextractgroup to be acceptable to it.\n \\ifnum0=`{\\fi\\expandafter\\@IEEEextractgroupremain\\@IEEEextractgrouparg}\\relax\n\\fi}\n\n% In the second part of the dirty tricks, we insert a leading { right after\n% the first group is acquired, but before the remainder is. Again, the\n% \\ifnum0=`}\\fi keeps TeX happy during definition time, but will disappear\n% during run time.\n\\def\\@IEEEextractgroupremain#1{\\def\\@IEEEextractedgroup{#1}\\expandafter\\@@IEEEextractgroupremain\\expandafter{\\ifnum0=`}\\fi}\n\n\\def\\@@IEEEextractgroupremain#1{\\def\\@IEEEextractedgroupremain{#1}}\n\n\n\n% \\@IEEEextracttoken relocated at top because margin setting commands rely on it\n\n\n\n% usage: \\@IEEEextracttokengroups*{}\n% \\@IEEEextracttokengroups fully expands its argument (which it then stores\n% in \\@IEEEextracttokengroupsarg) and then assigns the first \"brace group\" of\n% tokens (with the outermost braces removed) to the macro\n% \\@IEEEextractedfirstgroup.\n% The meaning of the first nonbrace (but including the empty group) token\n% within this first group is assigned via \\let to \\@IEEEextractedfirsttoken\n% as well as stored in the macro \\@IEEEextractedfirsttokenmacro. If a first\n% nonbrace token does not exist (or is an empty group), these will be \\relax\n% and empty, respectively. Tokens that would otherwise be discarded during\n% the acquisition of the first token in the first group are stored in\n% \\@IEEEextractedfirsttokensdiscarded, however their original relative brace\n% nesting depths are not guaranteed to be preserved.\n% The first group within this first group is stored in the macro\n% \\@IEEEextractedfirstfirstgroup.\n% Likewise for the next group after the first: \\@IEEEextractednextgroup,\n% \\@IEEEextractednextfirstgroup, \\@IEEEextractednextgroupfirsttoken,\n% \\@IEEEextractednextgroupfirsttokenmacro, and \n% \\@IEEEextractednextfirsttokensdiscarded.\n% All tokens/groups after the first group, including any enclosing braces,\n% are stored in the macro \\@IEEEextractedafterfirstgroupremain which will\n% be empty if none exist.\n%\n% For example:\n% \\@IEEEextracttokengroups{{{ab}{cd}}{{ef}g}}\n% will result in:\n%\n% \\@IEEEextracttokengroupsarg ==> a macro containing {{ab}{cd}}{{ef}g}\n% \\@IEEEextractedfirstgroup ==> a macro containing {ab}{cd}\n% \\@IEEEextractedafterfirstgroupremain ==> a macro containing {{ef}g}\n% \\@IEEEextractedfirsttoken ==> the letter a\n% \\@IEEEextractedfirsttokenmacro ==> a macro containing a\n% \\@IEEEextractedfirsttokensdiscarded ==> a macro containing bcd\n% \\@IEEEextractedfirstfirstgroup ==> a macro containing ab\n% \\@IEEEextractednextgroup ==> a macro containing {ef}g\n% \\@IEEEextractednextfirsttoken ==> the letter e\n% \\@IEEEextractednextfirsttokenmacro ==> a macro containing e\n% \\@IEEEextractednextfirsttokensdiscarded ==> a macro containing fg\n% \\@IEEEextractednextfirstgroup ==> a macro containing ef\n%\n% If given an empty argument, \\@IEEEextractedfirsttoken and\n% \\@IEEEextractednextfirsttoken will be set to \\relax\n% and all the macros will be empty.\n% the *-star form, \\@IEEEextracttokengroups*, does not expand its argument\n% contents during processing.\n%\n% Depends on: \\@IEEEextractgroup, \\@IEEEextracttoken\n\\def\\@IEEEextracttokengroups{\\@ifstar{\\let\\@IEEEextracttokengroupsdef=\\def\\@@IEEEextracttokengroups}{\\let\\@IEEEextracttokengroupsdef=\\edef\\@@IEEEextracttokengroups}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEextracttokengroups#1{\\@IEEEextracttokengroupsdef\\@IEEEextracttokengroupsarg{#1}\\relax\n% begin extraction, these functions are safe with empty arguments\n% first group\n\\expandafter\\@IEEEextractgroup\\expandafter*\\expandafter{\\@IEEEextracttokengroupsarg}\\relax\n\\let\\@IEEEextractedfirstgroup\\@IEEEextractedgroup\n\\let\\@IEEEextractedafterfirstgroupremain\\@IEEEextractedgroupremain\n\\expandafter\\@IEEEextracttoken\\expandafter*\\expandafter{\\@IEEEextractedfirstgroup}\\relax\n\\let\\@IEEEextractedfirsttoken\\@IEEEextractedtoken\n\\let\\@IEEEextractedfirsttokenmacro\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\n\\let\\@IEEEextractedfirsttokensdiscarded\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\n% first first group\n\\expandafter\\@IEEEextractgroup\\expandafter*\\expandafter{\\@IEEEextractedfirstgroup}\\relax\n\\let\\@IEEEextractedfirstfirstgroup\\@IEEEextractedgroup\n% next group\n\\expandafter\\@IEEEextractgroup\\expandafter*\\expandafter{\\@IEEEextractedafterfirstgroupremain}\\relax\n\\let\\@IEEEextractednextgroup\\@IEEEextractedgroup\n\\expandafter\\@IEEEextracttoken\\expandafter*\\expandafter{\\@IEEEextractednextgroup}\\relax\n\\let\\@IEEEextractednextfirsttoken\\@IEEEextractedtoken\n\\let\\@IEEEextractednextfirsttokenmacro\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\n\\let\\@IEEEextractednextfirsttokensdiscarded\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\n% next first group\n\\expandafter\\@IEEEextractgroup\\expandafter*\\expandafter{\\@IEEEextractednextgroup}\\relax\n\\let\\@IEEEextractednextfirstgroup\\@IEEEextractedgroup}\n\n\n%% -- End of Command Argument Scanning Support Functions --\n\n\n\n\n%%\n%% START OF IEEEeqnarray DEFINITIONS\n%%\n%% Inspired by the concepts, examples, and previous works of LaTeX \n%% coders and developers such as Donald Arseneau, Fred Bartlett, \n%% David Carlisle, Tony Liu, Frank Mittelbach, Piet van Oostrum, \n%% Roland Winkler and Mark Wooding.\n%% I don't make the claim that my work here is even near their calibre. ;)\n\n\n\\newif\\if@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojot% flag to indicate if the environment was called as the star form\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojotfalse\n\n\\newif\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt% tracks if the environment should advance the col counter\n% allows a way to make an \\IEEEeqnarraybox that can be used within an \\IEEEeqnarray\n% used by IEEEeqnarraymulticol so that it can work properly in both\n\\@advanceIEEEeqncolcnttrue\n\n\\newcount\\@IEEEeqnnumcols % tracks how many IEEEeqnarray cols are defined\n\\newcount\\@IEEEeqncolcnt % tracks how many IEEEeqnarray cols the user actually used\n\n\n% The default math style used by the columns\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraymathstyle{\\displaystyle}\n% The default text style used by the columns\n% default to using the current font\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraytextstyle{\\relax}\n\n% like the iedlistdecl but for \\IEEEeqnarray\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraydecl{\\relax}\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarrayboxdecl{\\relax}\n\n\n\n% V1.8 flags to indicate that equation numbering is to persist\n\\newif\\if@IEEEeqnumpersist%\n\\@IEEEeqnumpersistfalse\n\\newif\\if@IEEEsubeqnumpersist%\n\\@IEEEsubeqnumpersistfalse\n%\n% V1.8 flags to indicate if (sub)equation number of last line was preadvanced\n\\newif\\if@IEEEeqnumpreadv%\n\\@IEEEeqnumpreadvfalse\n\\newif\\if@IEEEsubeqnumpreadv%\n\\@IEEEsubeqnumpreadvfalse\n\n\\newcount\\@IEEEsubeqnnumrollback% saves previous value of IEEEsubequation number in case we need to restore it\n\n% \\yesnumber is the opposite of \\nonumber\n% a novel concept with the same def as the equationarray package\n% However, we give IEEE versions too since some LaTeX packages such as \n% the MDWtools mathenv.sty redefine \\nonumber to something else.\n% This command is intended for use in non-IEEEeqnarray math environments\n\\providecommand{\\yesnumber}{\\global\\@eqnswtrue}\n\n\n% IEEEyes/nonumber \n% V1.8 add persistant * forms\n% These commands can alter the type of equation an IEEEeqnarray line is.\n\\def\\IEEEyesnumber{\\@ifstar{\\global\\@IEEEeqnumpersisttrue\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpersistfalse\\@IEEEyesnumber}{\\@IEEEyesnumber}}\n\n\\def\\@IEEEyesnumber{\\global\\@eqnswtrue\n\\if@IEEEeqnarrayISinner% alter counters and label only inside an IEEEeqnarray\n\\ifnum\\c@IEEEsubequation>0\\relax\n \\stepcounter{equation}\\setcounter{IEEEsubequation}{0}\\gdef\\@currentlabel{\\p@equation\\theequation}\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentHref{\\@IEEEtheHrefequation}% setup hyperref label\n\\fi\n% even if we reached this eqn num via a preadv, it is legit now\n\\global\\@IEEEeqnumpreadvfalse\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpreadvfalse\n\\fi}\n\n\\def\\IEEEnonumber{\\@ifstar{\\global\\@IEEEeqnumpersistfalse\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpersistfalse\\global\\@eqnswfalse}{\\global\\@eqnswfalse}}\n\n\n\\def\\IEEEyessubnumber{\\@ifstar{\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpersisttrue\\@IEEEyessubnumber}{\\@IEEEyessubnumber}}\n%\n\\def\\@IEEEyessubnumber{\\if@IEEEeqnarrayISinner% alter counters and label only inside an IEEEeqnarray\n \\ifnum\\c@IEEEsubequation>0\\relax% if it already is a subequation, we are good to go as-is\n \\else% if we are a regular equation we have to watch out for two cases\n \\if@IEEEeqnumpreadv% if this equation is the result of a preadvance, backout and bump the sub eqnnum\n \\global\\advance\\c@equation\\m@ne\\global\\c@IEEEsubequation=\\@IEEEsubeqnnumrollback\\addtocounter{IEEEsubequation}{1}\\relax\n \\else% non-preadvanced equations just need initialization of their sub eqnnum\n \\setcounter{IEEEsubequation}{1}\\relax\n \\fi\n \\fi% fi already is subequation\n \\gdef\\@currentlabel{\\p@IEEEsubequation\\theIEEEsubequation}\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentHref{\\@IEEEtheHrefsubequation}% setup hyperref label\n \\global\\@IEEEeqnumpreadvfalse\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpreadvfalse% no longer a preadv anymore\n \\global\\@eqnswtrue\n\\fi}\n\n\n\\def\\IEEEnosubnumber{\\@ifstar{\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpersistfalse\\@IEEEnosubnumber}{\\@IEEEnosubnumber}}\n%\n\\def\\@IEEEnosubnumber{\\if@IEEEeqnarrayISinner% alter counters and label only inside an IEEEeqnarray\n \\if@eqnsw % we do nothing unless we know we will display because we play with the counters here\n % if it currently is a subequation, bump up to the next equation number and turn off the subequation\n \\ifnum\\c@IEEEsubequation>0\\relax\\addtocounter{equation}{1}\\setcounter{IEEEsubequation}{0}\\relax\n \\fi\n \\global\\@IEEEeqnumpreadvfalse\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpreadvfalse% no longer a preadv anymore\n \\gdef\\@currentlabel{\\p@equation\\theequation}\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentHref{\\@IEEEtheHrefequation}% setup hyperref label\n \\fi\n\\fi}\n\n\n\n% allows users to \"push away\" equations that get too close to the equation numbers\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraynumspace{\\hphantom{\\ifnum\\c@IEEEsubequation>0\\relax\\theIEEEsubequationdis\\else\\theequationdis\\fi}}\n\n% provides a way to span multiple columns within IEEEeqnarray environments\n% will consider \\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt before globally advancing the\n% column counter - so as to work within \\IEEEeqnarraybox\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarraymulticol{number cols. to span}{col type}{cell text}\n\\long\\def\\IEEEeqnarraymulticol#1#2#3{\\multispan{#1}\\relax\n% check if column is defined for the precolumn definition\n% We have to be careful here because TeX scans for & even within an \\iffalse\n% where it does not expand macros. So, if we used only one \\ifx and a #3\n% appeared in the false branch and the user inserted another alignment\n% structure that uses & in the \\IEEEeqnarraymulticol{}, TeX will not see that\n% there is an inner alignment in the false branch yet still will see any &\n% there and will think that they apply to the outer alignment resulting in an\n% incomplete \\ifx error.\n% So, here we use separate checks for the pre and post parts in order to keep\n% the #3 outside of all conditionals.\n\\relax\\expandafter\\ifx\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolDEF#2\\endcsname\\@IEEEeqnarraycolisdefined\\relax\n\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPRE#2\\endcsname\n\\else% if not, error and use default type\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Invalid column type \"#2\" in \\string\\IEEEeqnarraymulticol.\\MessageBreak\nUsing a default centering column instead}%\n{You must define IEEEeqnarray column types before use.}%\n\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPRE@IEEEdefault\\endcsname\n\\fi\n% The ten \\relax are to help prevent misleading error messages in case a user\n% accidently inserted a macro that tries to acquire additional arguments.\n#3\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\n% check if column is defined for the postcolumn definition\n\\expandafter\\ifx\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolDEF#2\\endcsname\\@IEEEeqnarraycolisdefined\\relax\n\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPOST#2\\endcsname\n\\else% if not, use the default type\n\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPOST@IEEEdefault\\endcsname\n\\fi\n% advance column counter only if the IEEEeqnarray environment wants it\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by #1\\relax\\fi}\n\n% like \\omit, but maintains track of the column counter for \\IEEEeqnarray\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarrayomit{\\omit\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by 1\\relax\\fi}\n\n\n% provides a way to define a letter referenced column type\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{col. type letter/name}{pre insertion text}{post insertion text}\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol#1#2#3{\\expandafter\\def\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPRE#1\\endcsname{#2}%\n\\expandafter\\def\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPOST#1\\endcsname{#3}%\n\\expandafter\\def\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolDEF#1\\endcsname{1}}\n\n\n% provides a way to define a numerically referenced inter-column glue types\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarraydefcolsep{col. glue number}{glue definition}\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraydefcolsep#1#2{\\expandafter\\def\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolSEP\\romannumeral #1\\endcsname{#2}%\n\\expandafter\\def\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolSEPDEF\\romannumeral #1\\endcsname{1}}\n\n\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraycolisdefined{1}% just a macro for 1, used for checking undefined column types\n\n\n% expands and appends the given argument to the \\@IEEEtrantmptoksA token list\n% used to build up the \\halign preamble\n\\def\\@IEEEappendtoksA#1{\\edef\\@@IEEEappendtoksA{\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA={\\the\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA #1}}%\n\\@@IEEEappendtoksA}\n\n% also appends to \\@IEEEtrantmptoksA, but does not expand the argument\n% uses \\toks8 as a scratchpad register\n\\def\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA#1{\\toks8={#1}%\n\\edef\\@@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA={\\the\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA\\the\\toks8}}%\n\\@@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA}\n\n% define some common column types for the user\n% math\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{l}{$\\IEEEeqnarraymathstyle}{$\\hfil}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{c}{\\hfil$\\IEEEeqnarraymathstyle}{$\\hfil}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{r}{\\hfil$\\IEEEeqnarraymathstyle}{$}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{L}{$\\IEEEeqnarraymathstyle{}}{{}$\\hfil}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{C}{\\hfil$\\IEEEeqnarraymathstyle{}}{{}$\\hfil}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{R}{\\hfil$\\IEEEeqnarraymathstyle{}}{{}$}\n% text\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{s}{\\IEEEeqnarraytextstyle}{\\hfil}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{t}{\\hfil\\IEEEeqnarraytextstyle}{\\hfil}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{u}{\\hfil\\IEEEeqnarraytextstyle}{}\n\n% vertical rules\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{v}{}{\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{vv}{\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth\\hfil}{\\hfil\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{V}{}{\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth\\hskip\\doublerulesep\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{VV}{\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth\\hskip\\doublerulesep\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth\\hfil}%\n{\\hfil\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth\\hskip\\doublerulesep\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth}\n\n% horizontal rules\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{h}{}{\\leaders\\hrule height\\arrayrulewidth\\hfil}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{H}{}{\\leaders\\vbox{\\hrule width\\arrayrulewidth\\vskip\\doublerulesep\\hrule width\\arrayrulewidth}\\hfil}\n\n% plain\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{x}{}{}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{X}{$}{$}\n\n% the default column type to use in the event a column type is not defined\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{@IEEEdefault}{\\hfil$\\IEEEeqnarraymathstyle}{$\\hfil}\n\n\n% a zero tabskip (used for \"-\" col types)\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero{0pt plus 0pt minus 0pt}\n% a centering tabskip (used for \"+\" col types)\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPcenter{1000pt plus 0pt minus 1000pt}\n\n% top level default tabskip glues for the start, end, and inter-column\n% may be reset within environments not always at the top level, e.g., \\IEEEeqnarraybox\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultstart{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPcenter}% default start glue\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultend{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPcenter}% default end glue\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultmid{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero}% default inter-column glue\n\n\n\n% creates a vertical rule that extends from the bottom to the top a a cell\n% Provided in case other packages redefine \\vline some other way.\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarrayvrule[rule thickness]\n% If no argument is provided, \\arrayrulewidth will be used for the rule thickness. \n\\newcommand\\IEEEeqnarrayvrule[1][\\arrayrulewidth]{\\vrule\\@width#1\\relax}\n\n% creates a blank separator row\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarrayseprow[separation length][font size commands]\n% default is \\IEEEeqnarrayseprow[0.25\\normalbaselineskip][\\relax]\n% blank arguments inherit the default values\n% uses \\skip5 as a scratch register - calls \\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsize which uses more scratch registers\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarrayseprow{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprow}{\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprow[0.25\\normalbaselineskip]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprow[#1]{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEeqnarrayseprow[#1]}{\\@@IEEEeqnarrayseprow[#1][\\relax]}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEeqnarrayseprow[#1][#2]{\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprowARGONE{#1}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprowARGONE\\@empty%\n% get the skip value, based on the font commands\n% use skip5 because \\IEEEeqnarraystrutsize uses \\skip0, \\skip2, \\skip3\n% assign within a bogus box to confine the font changes\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#2\\relax\\global\\skip5=0.25\\normalbaselineskip}}%\n\\else%\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#2\\relax\\global\\skip5=#1}}%\n\\fi%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayhoptolastcolumn\\IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{\\skip5}{0pt}[\\relax]\\relax}\n\n% creates a blank separator row, but omits all the column templates\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[separation length][font size commands]\n% default is \\IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[0.25\\normalbaselineskip][\\relax]\n% blank arguments inherit the default values\n% uses \\skip5 as a scratch register - calls \\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsize which uses more scratch registers\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut{\\multispan{\\@IEEEeqnnumcols}\\relax% span all the cols\n% advance column counter only if the IEEEeqnarray environment wants it\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by \\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax\\fi%\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut}{\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[0.25\\normalbaselineskip]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[#1]{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[#1]}{\\@@IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[#1][\\relax]}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[#1][#2]{\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprowARGONE{#1}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprowARGONE\\@empty%\n% get the skip value, based on the font commands\n% use skip5 because \\IEEEeqnarraystrutsize uses \\skip0, \\skip2, \\skip3\n% assign within a bogus box to confine the font changes\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#2\\relax\\global\\skip5=0.25\\normalbaselineskip}}%\n\\else%\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#2\\relax\\global\\skip5=#1}}%\n\\fi%\n\\IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{\\skip5}{0pt}[\\relax]\\relax}\n\n\n\n% draws a single rule across all the columns optional\n% argument determines the rule width, \\arrayrulewidth is the default\n% updates column counter as needed and turns off struts\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[rule line thickness]\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarrayrulerow{\\multispan{\\@IEEEeqnnumcols}\\relax% span all the cols\n% advance column counter only if the IEEEeqnarray environment wants it\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by \\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax\\fi%\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow}{\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[\\arrayrulewidth]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[#1]{\\leaders\\hrule height#1\\hfil\\relax% put in our rule \n% turn off any struts\n\\IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{0pt}{0pt}[\\relax]\\relax}\n\n\n% draws a double rule by using a single rule row, a separator row, and then\n% another single rule row \n% first optional argument determines the rule thicknesses, \\arrayrulewidth is the default\n% second optional argument determines the rule spacing, \\doublerulesep is the default\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[rule line thickness][rule spacing]\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow{\\multispan{\\@IEEEeqnnumcols}\\relax% span all the cols\n% advance column counter only if the IEEEeqnarray environment wants it\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by \\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax\\fi%\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow}{\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[\\arrayrulewidth]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[#1]{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[#1]}%\n{\\@@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[#1][\\doublerulesep]}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[#1][#2]{\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG{#1}%\n% we allow the user to say \\IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[][]\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG\\@empty%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[\\arrayrulewidth]%\n\\else%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[#1]\\relax%\n\\fi%\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG{#2}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG\\@empty%\n\\\\\\IEEEeqnarrayseprow[\\doublerulesep][\\relax]%\n\\else%\n\\\\\\IEEEeqnarrayseprow[#2][\\relax]%\n\\fi%\n\\\\\\multispan{\\@IEEEeqnnumcols}%\n% advance column counter only if the IEEEeqnarray environment wants it\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by \\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax\\fi%\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG{#1}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG\\@empty%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[\\arrayrulewidth]%\n\\else%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[#1]%\n\\fi%\n}\n\n% draws a double rule by using a single rule row, a separator (cutting) row, and then\n% another single rule row \n% first optional argument determines the rule thicknesses, \\arrayrulewidth is the default\n% second optional argument determines the rule spacing, \\doublerulesep is the default\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[rule line thickness][rule spacing]\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowcut{\\multispan{\\@IEEEeqnnumcols}\\relax% span all the cols\n% advance column counter only if the IEEEeqnarray environment wants it\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by \\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax\\fi%\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowcut}{\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowcut[\\arrayrulewidth]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowcut[#1]{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowcut[#1]}%\n{\\@@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowcut[#1][\\doublerulesep]}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowcut[#1][#2]{\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG{#1}%\n% we allow the user to say \\IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[][]\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG\\@empty%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[\\arrayrulewidth]%\n\\else%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[#1]%\n\\fi%\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG{#2}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG\\@empty%\n\\\\\\IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[\\doublerulesep][\\relax]%\n\\else%\n\\\\\\IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[#2][\\relax]%\n\\fi%\n\\\\\\multispan{\\@IEEEeqnnumcols}%\n% advance column counter only if the IEEEeqnarray environment wants it\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by \\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax\\fi%\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG{#1}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG\\@empty%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[\\arrayrulewidth]%\n\\else%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[#1]%\n\\fi%\n}\n\n\n\n% inserts a full row's worth of &'s\n% relies on \\@IEEEeqnnumcols to provide the correct number of columns\n% uses \\@IEEEtrantmptoksA, \\count0 as scratch registers\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayhoptolastcolumn{\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA={}\\count0=1\\relax%\n\\loop% add cols if the user did not use them all\n\\ifnum\\count0<\\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax%\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{&}%\n\\advance\\count0 by 1\\relax% update the col count\n\\repeat%\n\\the\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA%execute the &'s\n}\n\n\n\n\\newif\\if@IEEEeqnarrayISinner % flag to indicate if we are within the lines\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayISinnerfalse % of an IEEEeqnarray - after the IEEEeqnarraydecl\n\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight{0pt} % height and depth of IEEEeqnarray struts\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth{0pt}\n\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutheight{0pt} % default height and depth of\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutdepth{0pt} % struts within an IEEEeqnarray\n\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutHSAVE{0pt} % saved master strut height\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutDSAVE{0pt} % and depth\n\n\\newif\\if@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstrut % flag to indicate that the master strut value\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstruttrue % is to be used\n\n\n\n% saves the strut height and depth of the master strut\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraymasterstrutsave{\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip0=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutheight\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip2=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutdepth\\relax%\n% remove stretchability\n\\dimen0\\skip0\\relax%\n\\dimen2\\skip2\\relax%\n% save values\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutHSAVE{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutDSAVE{\\the\\dimen2}}\n\n% restores the strut height and depth of the master strut\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraymasterstrutrestore{\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip0=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutHSAVE\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip2=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutDSAVE\\relax%\n% remove stretchability\n\\dimen0\\skip0\\relax%\n\\dimen2\\skip2\\relax%\n% restore values\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutheight{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutdepth{\\the\\dimen2}}\n\n\n% globally restores the strut height and depth to the \n% master values and sets the master strut flag to true\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutreset{\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip0=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutheight\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip2=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutdepth\\relax%\n% remove stretchability\n\\dimen0\\skip0\\relax%\n\\dimen2\\skip2\\relax%\n% restore values\n\\xdef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\xdef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth{\\the\\dimen2}%\n\\global\\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstruttrue}\n\n\n% if the master strut is not to be used, make the current\n% values of \\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight, \\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth\n% and the use master strut flag, global\n% this allows user strut commands issued in the last column to be carried\n% into the isolation/strut column\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayglobalizestrutstatus{\\relax%\n\\if@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstrut\\else%\n\\xdef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight{\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight}%\n\\xdef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth{\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth}%\n\\global\\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstrutfalse%\n\\fi}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{height}{depth}[font size commands]\n% If called outside the lines of an IEEEeqnarray, sets the height\n% and depth of both the master and local struts. If called inside\n% an IEEEeqnarray line, sets the height and depth of the local strut\n% only and sets the flag to indicate the use of the local strut\n% values. If the height or depth is left blank, 0.7\\normalbaselineskip\n% and 0.3\\normalbaselineskip will be used, respectively.\n% The optional argument can be used to evaluate the lengths under\n% a different font size and styles. If none is specified, the current\n% font is used.\n% uses scratch registers \\skip0, \\skip2, \\skip3, \\dimen0, \\dimen2\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraystrutsize#1#2{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{#1}{#2}}{\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{#1}{#2}[\\relax]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsize#1#2[#3]{\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeARG{#1}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeARG\\@empty%\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#3\\relax\\global\\skip3=0.7\\normalbaselineskip}}%\n\\skip0=\\skip3\\relax%\n\\else% arg one present\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#3\\relax\\global\\skip3=#1\\relax}}%\n\\skip0=\\skip3\\relax%\n\\fi% if null arg\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeARG{#2}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeARG\\@empty%\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#3\\relax\\global\\skip3=0.3\\normalbaselineskip}}%\n\\skip2=\\skip3\\relax%\n\\else% arg two present\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#3\\relax\\global\\skip3=#2\\relax}}%\n\\skip2=\\skip3\\relax%\n\\fi% if null arg\n% remove stretchability, just to be safe\n\\dimen0\\skip0\\relax%\n\\dimen2\\skip2\\relax%\n% dimen0 = height, dimen2 = depth\n\\if@IEEEeqnarrayISinner% inner does not touch master strut size\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth{\\the\\dimen2}%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstrutfalse% do not use master\n\\else% outer, have to set master strut too\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutheight{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutdepth{\\the\\dimen2}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth{\\the\\dimen2}%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstruttrue% use master strut\n\\fi}\n\n\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeadd{added height}{added depth}[font size commands]\n% If called outside the lines of an IEEEeqnarray, adds the given height\n% and depth to both the master and local struts.\n% If called inside an IEEEeqnarray line, adds the given height and depth\n% to the local strut only and sets the flag to indicate the use \n% of the local strut values.\n% In both cases, if a height or depth is left blank, 0pt is used instead.\n% The optional argument can be used to evaluate the lengths under\n% a different font size and styles. If none is specified, the current\n% font is used.\n% uses scratch registers \\skip0, \\skip2, \\skip3, \\dimen0, \\dimen2\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeadd#1#2{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeadd{#1}{#2}}{\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeadd{#1}{#2}[\\relax]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeadd#1#2[#3]{\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizearg{#1}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizearg\\@empty%\n\\skip0=0pt\\relax%\n\\else% arg one present\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#3\\relax\\global\\skip3=#1}}%\n\\skip0=\\skip3\\relax%\n\\fi% if null arg\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizearg{#2}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizearg\\@empty%\n\\skip2=0pt\\relax%\n\\else% arg two present\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#3\\relax\\global\\skip3=#2}}%\n\\skip2=\\skip3\\relax%\n\\fi% if null arg\n% remove stretchability, just to be safe\n\\dimen0\\skip0\\relax%\n\\dimen2\\skip2\\relax%\n% dimen0 = height, dimen2 = depth\n\\if@IEEEeqnarrayISinner% inner does not touch master strut size\n% get local strut size\n\\expandafter\\skip0=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip2=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth\\relax%\n% add it to the user supplied values\n\\advance\\dimen0 by \\skip0\\relax%\n\\advance\\dimen2 by \\skip2\\relax%\n% update the local strut size\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth{\\the\\dimen2}%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstrutfalse% do not use master\n\\else% outer, have to set master strut too\n% get master strut size\n\\expandafter\\skip0=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutheight\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip2=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutdepth\\relax%\n% add it to the user supplied values\n\\advance\\dimen0 by \\skip0\\relax%\n\\advance\\dimen2 by \\skip2\\relax%\n% update the local and master strut sizes\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutheight{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutdepth{\\the\\dimen2}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth{\\the\\dimen2}%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstruttrue% use master strut\n\\fi}\n\n\n% allow user a way to see the struts\n\\newif\\ifIEEEvisiblestruts\n\\IEEEvisiblestrutsfalse\n\n% inserts an invisible strut using the master or local strut values\n% uses scratch registers \\skip0, \\skip2, \\dimen0, \\dimen2\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayinsertstrut{\\relax%\n\\if@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstrut\n% get master strut size\n\\expandafter\\skip0=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutheight\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip2=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutdepth\\relax%\n\\else%\n% get local strut size\n\\expandafter\\skip0=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip2=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth\\relax%\n\\fi%\n% remove stretchability, probably not needed\n\\dimen0\\skip0\\relax%\n\\dimen2\\skip2\\relax%\n% dimen0 = height, dimen2 = depth\n% allow user to see struts if desired\n\\ifIEEEvisiblestruts%\n\\vrule width0.2pt height\\dimen0 depth\\dimen2\\relax%\n\\else%\n\\vrule width0pt height\\dimen0 depth\\dimen2\\relax\\fi}\n\n\n% creates an invisible strut, useable even outside \\IEEEeqnarray\n% if \\IEEEvisiblestrutstrue, the strut will be visible and 0.2pt wide. \n% usage: \\IEEEstrut[height][depth][font size commands]\n% default is \\IEEEstrut[0.7\\normalbaselineskip][0.3\\normalbaselineskip][\\relax]\n% blank arguments inherit the default values\n% uses \\dimen0, \\dimen2, \\skip0, \\skip2\n\\def\\IEEEstrut{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEstrut}{\\@IEEEstrut[0.7\\normalbaselineskip]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEstrut[#1]{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEstrut[#1]}{\\@@IEEEstrut[#1][0.3\\normalbaselineskip]}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEstrut[#1][#2]{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@@IEEEstrut[#1][#2]}{\\@@@IEEEstrut[#1][#2][\\relax]}}\n\\def\\@@@IEEEstrut[#1][#2][#3]{\\mbox{#3\\relax%\n\\def\\@IEEEstrutARG{#1}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEstrutARG\\@empty%\n\\skip0=0.7\\normalbaselineskip\\relax%\n\\else%\n\\skip0=#1\\relax%\n\\fi%\n\\def\\@IEEEstrutARG{#2}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEstrutARG\\@empty%\n\\skip2=0.3\\normalbaselineskip\\relax%\n\\else%\n\\skip2=#2\\relax%\n\\fi%\n% remove stretchability, probably not needed\n\\dimen0\\skip0\\relax%\n\\dimen2\\skip2\\relax%\n\\ifIEEEvisiblestruts%\n\\vrule width0.2pt height\\dimen0 depth\\dimen2\\relax%\n\\else%\n\\vrule width0.0pt height\\dimen0 depth\\dimen2\\relax\\fi}}\n\n\n% enables strut mode by setting a default strut size and then zeroing the\n% \\baselineskip, \\lineskip, \\lineskiplimit and \\jot\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraystrutmode{\\IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{0.7\\normalbaselineskip}{0.3\\normalbaselineskip}[\\relax]%\n\\baselineskip=0pt\\lineskip=0pt\\lineskiplimit=0pt\\jot=0pt}\n\n\n% equation and subequation forms to use to setup hyperref's \\@currentHref\n\\def\\@IEEEtheHrefequation{equation.\\theHequation}\n\\def\\@IEEEtheHrefsubequation{equation.\\theHequation\\alph{IEEEsubequation}}\n\n\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarray{\\@IEEEeqnumpersisttrue\\@IEEEsubeqnumpersistfalse\\@IEEEeqnarray}\n\\def\\endIEEEeqnarray{\\end@IEEEeqnarray}\n\n\\@namedef{IEEEeqnarray*}{\\@IEEEeqnumpersistfalse\\@IEEEsubeqnumpersistfalse\\@IEEEeqnarray}\n\\@namedef{endIEEEeqnarray*}{\\end@IEEEeqnarray}\n\n\n% \\IEEEeqnarray is an enhanced \\eqnarray. \n% The star form defaults to not putting equation numbers at the end of each row.\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarray[decl]{cols}\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarray{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEeqnarray}{\\@@IEEEeqnarray[\\relax]}}\n% We have to be careful here to normalize catcodes just before acquiring the\n% cols as that specification may contain punctuation which could be subject\n% to document catcode changes.\n\\def\\@@IEEEeqnarray[#1]{\\begingroup\\IEEEnormalcatcodes\\@@@IEEEeqnarray[#1]}\n\\def\\@@@IEEEeqnarray[#1]#2{\\endgroup\n % default to showing the equation number or not based on whether or not\n % the star form was involked\n \\if@IEEEeqnumpersist\\global\\@eqnswtrue\n \\else% not the star form\n \\global\\@eqnswfalse\n \\fi% if star form\n % provide a basic hyperref \\theHequation if this has not already been setup (hyperref not loaded, or no section counter)\n \\@ifundefined{theHequation}{\\def\\theHequation{\\arabic{equation}}}{}\\relax\n % provide dummy hyperref commands in case hyperref is not loaded\n \\providecommand{\\Hy@raisedlink}[1]{}\\relax\n \\providecommand{\\hyper@anchorstart}[1]{}\\relax\n \\providecommand{\\hyper@anchorend}{}\\relax\n \\providecommand{\\@currentHref}{}\\relax\n \\@IEEEeqnumpreadvfalse% reset eqnpreadv flag\n \\@IEEEsubeqnumpreadvfalse% reset subeqnpreadv flag\n \\@IEEEeqnarrayISinnerfalse% not yet within the lines of the halign\n \\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{0pt}{0pt}[\\relax]% turn off struts by default\n \\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstruttrue% use master strut till user asks otherwise\n \\IEEEvisiblestrutsfalse% diagnostic mode defaults to off\n % no extra space unless the user specifically requests it\n \\lineskip=0pt\\relax\n \\lineskiplimit=0pt\\relax\n \\baselineskip=\\normalbaselineskip\\relax%\n \\jot=\\IEEEnormaljot\\relax%\n \\mathsurround\\z@\\relax% no extra spacing around math\n \\@advanceIEEEeqncolcnttrue% advance the col counter for each col the user uses, \n % used in \\IEEEeqnarraymulticol and in the preamble build\n %V1.8 Here we preadvance to the next equation number.\n % If the user later wants a continued subequation, we can roll back.\n \\global\\@IEEEsubeqnnumrollback=\\c@IEEEsubequation%\n \\stepcounter{equation}\\@IEEEeqnumpreadvtrue% advance equation counter before first line\n \\setcounter{IEEEsubequation}{0}% no subequation yet\n \\let\\@IEEEcurrentlabelsave\\@currentlabel% save current label as we later change it globally\n \\let\\@IEEEcurrentHrefsave\\@currentHref% save current href label as we later change it globally\n \\def\\@currentlabel{\\p@equation\\theequation}% redefine the ref label\n \\def\\@currentHref{\\@IEEEtheHrefequation}% setup hyperref label\n \\IEEEeqnarraydecl\\relax% allow a way for the user to make global overrides\n #1\\relax% allow user to override defaults\n \\let\\\\\\@IEEEeqnarraycr% replace newline with one that can put in eqn. numbers\n \\global\\@IEEEeqncolcnt\\z@% col. count = 0 for first line\n \\@IEEEbuildpreamble{#2}\\relax% build the preamble and put it into \\@IEEEtrantmptoksA \n % put in the column for the equation number\n \\ifnum\\@IEEEeqnnumcols>0\\relax\\@IEEEappendtoksA{&}\\fi% col separator for those after the first\n \\toks0={##}%\n % advance the \\@IEEEeqncolcnt for the isolation col, this helps with error checking\n \\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by 1\\relax}%\n % add the isolation column\n \\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\tabskip\\z@skip\\bgroup\\the\\toks0\\egroup}%\n % advance the \\@IEEEeqncolcnt for the equation number col, this helps with error checking\n \\@IEEEappendtoksA{&\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by 1\\relax}%\n % add the equation number col to the preamble\n \\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\tabskip\\z@skip\\hb@xt@\\z@\\bgroup\\hss\\the\\toks0\\egroup}%\n % note \\@IEEEeqnnumcols does not count the equation col or isolation col\n % set the starting tabskip glue as determined by the preamble build\n \\tabskip=\\@IEEEBPstartglue\\relax\n % begin the display alignment\n \\@IEEEeqnarrayISinnertrue% commands are now within the lines\n $$\\everycr{}\\halign to\\displaywidth\\bgroup\n % \"exspand\" the preamble\n \\span\\the\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA\\cr}\n\n% enter isolation/strut column (or the next column if the user did not use\n% every column), record the strut status, complete the columns, do the strut if needed,\n% restore counters (to backout any equation setup for a next line that was never used)\n% to their correct values and exit\n\\def\\end@IEEEeqnarray{\\@IEEEeqnarrayglobalizestrutstatus&\\@@IEEEeqnarraycr\\egroup\n\\if@IEEEsubeqnumpreadv\\global\\advance\\c@IEEEsubequation\\m@ne\\fi\n\\if@IEEEeqnumpreadv\\global\\advance\\c@equation\\m@ne\\global\\c@IEEEsubequation=\\@IEEEsubeqnnumrollback\\fi\n\\global\\let\\@currentlabel\\@IEEEcurrentlabelsave% restore current label\n\\global\\let\\@currentHref\\@IEEEcurrentHrefsave% restore current href label\n$$\\@ignoretrue}\n\n\n% IEEEeqnarray uses a modifed \\\\ instead of the plain \\cr to\n% end rows. This allows for things like \\\\*[vskip amount]\n% These \"cr\" macros are modified versions of those for LaTeX2e's eqnarray\n% the {\\ifnum0=`} braces must be kept away from the last column to avoid\n% altering spacing of its math, so we use & to advance to the next column\n% as there is an isolation/strut column after the user's columns\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraycr{\\@IEEEeqnarrayglobalizestrutstatus&% save strut status and advance to next column\n {\\ifnum0=`}\\fi\n \\@ifstar{%\n \\global\\@eqpen\\@M\\@IEEEeqnarrayYCR\n }{%\n \\global\\@eqpen\\interdisplaylinepenalty \\@IEEEeqnarrayYCR\n }%\n}\n\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayYCR{\\@testopt\\@IEEEeqnarrayXCR\\z@skip}\n\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayXCR[#1]{%\n \\ifnum0=`{\\fi}%\n \\@@IEEEeqnarraycr\n \\noalign{\\penalty\\@eqpen\\vskip\\jot\\vskip #1\\relax}}%\n\n\\def\\@@IEEEeqnarraycr{\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA={}% clear token register\n \\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by -1\\relax% adjust col count because of the isolation column\n \\ifnum\\@IEEEeqncolcnt>\\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Too many columns within the IEEEeqnarray\\MessageBreak\n environment}%\n {Use fewer \\string &'s or put more columns in the IEEEeqnarray column\\MessageBreak \n specifications.}\\relax%\n \\else\n \\loop% add cols if the user did not use them all\n \\ifnum\\@IEEEeqncolcnt<\\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax\n \\@IEEEappendtoksA{&}%\n \\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by 1\\relax% update the col count\n \\repeat\n % this number of &'s will take us the the isolation column\n \\fi\n % execute the &'s\n \\the\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA%\n % handle the strut/isolation column\n \\@IEEEeqnarrayinsertstrut% do the strut if needed\n \\@IEEEeqnarraystrutreset% reset the strut system for next line or IEEEeqnarray\n &% and enter the equation number column\n \\if@eqnsw% only if we display something\n \\Hy@raisedlink{\\hyper@anchorstart{\\@currentHref}}% start a hyperref anchor\n \\global\\@IEEEeqnumpreadvfalse\\relax% displaying an equation number means\n \\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpreadvfalse\\relax% the equation counters point to valid equations\n % V1.8 Here we setup the counters, currentlabel and status for what would be the *next*\n % equation line as would be the case under the current settings. However, there are two problems.\n % One problem is that there might not ever be a next line. The second problem is that the user\n % may later alter the meaning of a line with commands such as \\IEEEyessubnumber. So, to handle\n % these cases we have to record the current values of the (sub)equation counters and revert back\n % to them if the next line is changed or never comes. The \\if@IEEEeqnumpreadv, \\if@IEEEsubeqnumpreadv\n % and \\@IEEEsubeqnnumrollback stuff tracks this.\n % The logic to handle all this is surprisingly complex, but a nice feature of the approach here is\n % that the equation counters and labels remain valid for what the line would be unless a\n % \\IEEEyessubnumber et al. later changes it. So, any hyperref links are always correct.\n \\ifnum\\c@IEEEsubequation>0\\relax% handle subequation\n \\theIEEEsubequationdis\\relax\n \\if@IEEEsubeqnumpersist% setup for default type of next line\n \\stepcounter{IEEEsubequation}\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpreadvtrue\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentlabel{\\p@IEEEsubequation\\theIEEEsubequation}\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentHref{\\@IEEEtheHrefsubequation}% setup hyperref label\n \\else\n % if no subeqnum persist, go ahead and setup for a new equation number\n \\global\\@IEEEsubeqnnumrollback=\\c@IEEEsubequation\n \\stepcounter{equation}\\global\\@IEEEeqnumpreadvtrue\\relax\n \\setcounter{IEEEsubequation}{0}\\gdef\\@currentlabel{\\p@equation\\theequation}\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentHref{\\@IEEEtheHrefequation}% setup hyperref label\n \\fi\n \\else% display a standard equation number\n \\theequationdis\\relax\n \\setcounter{IEEEsubequation}{0}\\relax% not really needed\n \\if@IEEEsubeqnumpersist% setup for default type of next line\n % subequations that follow plain equations carry the same equation number e.g, 5, 5a rather than 5, 6a\n \\stepcounter{IEEEsubequation}\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpreadvtrue\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentlabel{\\p@IEEEsubequation\\theIEEEsubequation}\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentHref{\\@IEEEtheHrefsubequation}% setup hyperref label\n \\else\n % if no subeqnum persist, go ahead and setup for a new equation number\n \\global\\@IEEEsubeqnnumrollback=\\c@IEEEsubequation\n \\stepcounter{equation}\\global\\@IEEEeqnumpreadvtrue\\relax\n \\setcounter{IEEEsubequation}{0}\\gdef\\@currentlabel{\\p@equation\\theequation}\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentHref{\\@IEEEtheHrefequation}% setup hyperref label\n \\fi\n \\fi%\n \\Hy@raisedlink{\\hyper@anchorend}% end hyperref anchor\n \\fi% fi only if we display something\n % reset the flags to indicate the default preferences of the display of equation numbers\n \\if@IEEEeqnumpersist\\global\\@eqnswtrue\\else\\global\\@eqnswfalse\\fi\n \\if@IEEEsubeqnumpersist\\global\\@eqnswtrue\\fi% ditto for the subequation flag\n % reset the number of columns the user actually used\n \\global\\@IEEEeqncolcnt\\z@\\relax\n % the real end of the line\n \\cr}\n\n\n\n\n\n% \\IEEEeqnarraybox is like \\IEEEeqnarray except the box form puts everything\n% inside a vtop, vbox, or vcenter box depending on the letter in the second\n% optional argument (t,b,c). Vbox is the default. Unlike \\IEEEeqnarray,\n% equation numbers are not displayed and \\IEEEeqnarraybox can be nested.\n% \\IEEEeqnarrayboxm is for math mode (like \\array) and does not put the vbox\n% within an hbox.\n% \\IEEEeqnarrayboxt is for text mode (like \\tabular) and puts the vbox within\n% a \\hbox{$ $} construct.\n% \\IEEEeqnarraybox will auto detect whether to use \\IEEEeqnarrayboxm or \n% \\IEEEeqnarrayboxt depending on the math mode.\n% The third optional argument specifies the width this box is to be set to -\n% natural width is the default.\n% The * forms do not add \\jot line spacing\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarraybox[decl][pos][width]{cols}\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarrayboxm{\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojotfalse\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWfalse\\@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\\def\\endIEEEeqnarrayboxm{\\end@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\\@namedef{IEEEeqnarrayboxm*}{\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojottrue\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWfalse\\@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\\@namedef{endIEEEeqnarrayboxm*}{\\end@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarrayboxt{\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojotfalse\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWtrue\\@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\\def\\endIEEEeqnarrayboxt{\\end@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\\@namedef{IEEEeqnarrayboxt*}{\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojottrue\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWtrue\\@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\\@namedef{endIEEEeqnarrayboxt*}{\\end@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraybox{\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojotfalse\\ifmmode\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWfalse\\else\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWtrue\\fi%\n\\@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\\def\\endIEEEeqnarraybox{\\end@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\n\\@namedef{IEEEeqnarraybox*}{\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojottrue\\ifmmode\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWfalse\\else\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWtrue\\fi%\n\\@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\\@namedef{endIEEEeqnarraybox*}{\\end@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\n% flag to indicate if the \\IEEEeqnarraybox needs to put things into an hbox{$ $} \n% for \\vcenter in non-math mode\n\\newif\\if@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSW%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWfalse\n\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraybox{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEeqnarraybox}{\\@@IEEEeqnarraybox[\\relax]}}\n% We have to be careful here to normalize catcodes just before acquiring the\n% cols as that specification may contain punctuation which could be subject\n% to document catcode changes.\n\\def\\@@IEEEeqnarraybox[#1]{\\relax\\begingroup\\IEEEnormalcatcodes\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@@IEEEeqnarraybox[#1]}{\\@@@IEEEeqnarraybox[#1][b]}}\n\\def\\@@@IEEEeqnarraybox[#1][#2]{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@@@IEEEeqnarraybox[#1][#2]}{\\@@@@IEEEeqnarraybox[#1][#2][\\relax]}}\n\n% #1 = decl; #2 = t,b,c; #3 = width, #4 = col specs\n\\def\\@@@@IEEEeqnarraybox[#1][#2][#3]#4{\\endgroup\\@IEEEeqnarrayISinnerfalse % not yet within the lines of the halign\n \\@IEEEeqnarraymasterstrutsave% save current master strut values\n \\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{0pt}{0pt}[\\relax]% turn off struts by default\n \\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstruttrue% use master strut till user asks otherwise\n \\IEEEvisiblestrutsfalse% diagnostic mode defaults to off\n % no extra space unless the user specifically requests it\n \\lineskip=0pt\\relax%\n \\lineskiplimit=0pt\\relax%\n \\baselineskip=\\normalbaselineskip\\relax%\n \\jot=\\IEEEnormaljot\\relax%\n \\mathsurround\\z@\\relax% no extra spacing around math\n % the default end glues are zero for an \\IEEEeqnarraybox\n \\edef\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultstart{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero}% default start glue\n \\edef\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultend{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero}% default end glue\n \\edef\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultmid{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero}% default inter-column glue\n \\@advanceIEEEeqncolcntfalse% do not advance the col counter for each col the user uses, \n % used in \\IEEEeqnarraymulticol and in the preamble build\n \\IEEEeqnarrayboxdecl\\relax% allow a way for the user to make global overrides\n #1\\relax% allow user to override defaults\n \\let\\\\\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxcr% replace newline with one that allows optional spacing\n \\@IEEEbuildpreamble{#4}\\relax% build the preamble and put it into \\@IEEEtrantmptoksA\n % add an isolation column to the preamble to stop \\\\'s {} from getting into the last col\n \\ifnum\\@IEEEeqnnumcols>0\\relax\\@IEEEappendtoksA{&}\\fi% col separator for those after the first\n \\toks0={##}%\n % add the isolation column to the preamble\n \\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\tabskip\\z@skip\\bgroup\\the\\toks0\\egroup}% \n % set the starting tabskip glue as determined by the preamble build\n \\tabskip=\\@IEEEBPstartglue\\relax\n % begin the alignment\n \\everycr{}%\n % use only the very first token to determine the positioning\n \\@IEEEextracttoken{#2}\\relax\n \\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\@empty\\else\n \\typeout{** WARNING: IEEEeqnarraybox position specifiers after the first in `\\@IEEEextracttokenarg' ignored (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\relax\n \\fi\n % \\@IEEEextractedtoken has the first token, the rest are ignored\n % if we need to put things into and hbox and go into math mode, do so now\n \\if@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSW \\leavevmode \\hbox \\bgroup $\\fi%\n % use the appropriate vbox type\n \\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken t\\relax\\vtop\\else\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken c\\relax%\n \\vcenter\\else\\vbox\\fi\\fi\\bgroup%\n \\@IEEEeqnarrayISinnertrue% commands are now within the lines\n \\ifx#3\\relax\\halign\\else\\halign to #3\\relax\\fi%\n \\bgroup\n % \"exspand\" the preamble\n \\span\\the\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA\\cr}\n\n% carry strut status and enter the isolation/strut column, \n% exit from math mode if needed, and exit\n\\def\\end@IEEEeqnarraybox{\\@IEEEeqnarrayglobalizestrutstatus% carry strut status\n&% enter isolation/strut column\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayinsertstrut% do strut if needed\n\\@IEEEeqnarraymasterstrutrestore% restore the previous master strut values\n% reset the strut system for next IEEEeqnarray\n% (sets local strut values back to previous master strut values)\n\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutreset%\n% ensure last line, exit from halign, close vbox\n\\crcr\\egroup\\egroup%\n% exit from math mode and close hbox if needed\n\\if@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSW $\\egroup\\fi}\n\n\n\n% IEEEeqnarraybox uses a modifed \\\\ instead of the plain \\cr to\n% end rows. This allows for things like \\\\[vskip amount]\n% This \"cr\" macros are modified versions those for LaTeX2e's eqnarray\n% For IEEEeqnarraybox, \\\\* is the same as \\\\\n% the {\\ifnum0=`} braces must be kept away from the last column to avoid\n% altering spacing of its math, so we use & to advance to the isolation/strut column\n% carry strut status into isolation/strut column\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxcr{\\@IEEEeqnarrayglobalizestrutstatus% carry strut status\n&% enter isolation/strut column\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayinsertstrut% do strut if needed\n% reset the strut system for next line or IEEEeqnarray\n\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutreset%\n{\\ifnum0=`}\\fi%\n\\@ifstar{\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxYCR}{\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxYCR}}\n\n% test and setup the optional argument to \\\\[]\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxYCR{\\@testopt\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxXCR\\z@skip}\n\n% IEEEeqnarraybox does not automatically increase line spacing by \\jot\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxXCR[#1]{\\ifnum0=`{\\fi}%\n\\cr\\noalign{\\if@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojot\\else\\vskip\\jot\\fi\\vskip#1\\relax}}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\@IEEEbuildpreamble{column specifiers}\n% starts the halign preamble build \n% the assembled preamble is put in \\@IEEEtrantmptoksA\n\\def\\@IEEEbuildpreamble#1{\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA={}% clear token register\n\\let\\@IEEEBPcurtype=u%current column type is not yet known\n\\let\\@IEEEBPprevtype=s%the previous column type was the start\n\\let\\@IEEEBPnexttype=u%next column type is not yet known\n% ensure these are valid\n\\def\\@IEEEBPcurglue={0pt plus 0pt minus 0pt}%\n\\def\\@IEEEBPcurcolname{@IEEEdefault}% name of current column definition\n% currently acquired numerically referenced glue\n% use a name that is easier to remember\n\\let\\@IEEEBPcurnum=\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA%\n\\@IEEEBPcurnum=0%\n% tracks number of columns in the preamble\n\\@IEEEeqnnumcols=0%\n% record the default end glues\n\\edef\\@IEEEBPstartglue{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultstart}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEBPendglue{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultend}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEedefMACRO{#1}\\relax% fully expand the preamble to support macro containers\n% now parse the user's column specifications\n% \\ignorespaces is used as a delimiter, need at least one trailing \\relax because\n% \\@@IEEEbuildpreamble looks into the future \n\\expandafter\\@@IEEEbuildpreamble\\@IEEEedefMACRO\\ignorespaces\\relax\\relax}\n\n\n% usage: \\@@IEEEbuildpreamble{current column}{next column}\n% parses and builds the halign preamble\n\\def\\@@IEEEbuildpreamble#1#2{\\let\\@@nextIEEEbuildpreamble=\\@@IEEEbuildpreamble%\n% use only the very first token to check the end\n\\@IEEEextracttokengroups{#1}\\relax\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractedfirsttoken\\ignorespaces\\let\\@@nextIEEEbuildpreamble=\\@@IEEEfinishpreamble\\else%\n% identify current and next token type\n\\@IEEEgetcoltype{#1}{\\@IEEEBPcurtype}{1}% current, error on invalid\n\\@IEEEgetcoltype{#2}{\\@IEEEBPnexttype}{0}% next, no error on invalid next\n% if curtype is a glue, get the glue def\n\\if\\@IEEEBPcurtype g\\@IEEEgetcurglue{#1}{\\@IEEEBPcurglue}\\fi%\n% if curtype is a column, get the column def and set the current column name\n\\if\\@IEEEBPcurtype c\\@IEEEgetcurcol{#1}\\fi%\n% if curtype is a numeral, acquire the user defined glue\n\\if\\@IEEEBPcurtype n\\@IEEEprocessNcol{#1}\\fi%\n% process the acquired glue \n\\if\\@IEEEBPcurtype g\\@IEEEprocessGcol\\fi%\n% process the acquired col \n\\if\\@IEEEBPcurtype c\\@IEEEprocessCcol\\fi%\n% ready prevtype for next col spec.\n\\let\\@IEEEBPprevtype=\\@IEEEBPcurtype%\n% be sure and put back the future token(s) as a group\n\\fi\\@@nextIEEEbuildpreamble{#2}}\n\n\n% usage: \\@@IEEEfinishpreamble{discarded}\n% executed just after preamble build is completed\n% warn about zero cols, and if prevtype type = u, put in end tabskip glue\n% argument is not used\n\\def\\@@IEEEfinishpreamble#1{\\ifnum\\@IEEEeqnnumcols<1\\relax\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{No column specifiers declared for IEEEeqnarray}%\n{At least one column type must be declared for each IEEEeqnarray.}%\n\\fi%num cols less than 1\n%if last type undefined, set default end tabskip glue\n\\if\\@IEEEBPprevtype u\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\tabskip=\\@IEEEBPendglue}\\fi}\n\n\n% usage: \\@IEEEgetcoltype{col specifier}{\\output}{error more}\n% Identify and return the column specifier's type code in the given\n% \\output macro:\n% n = number\n% g = glue (any other char in catagory 12)\n% c = letter\n% e = \\ignorespaces (end of sequence)\n% u = undefined\n% error mode: 0 = no error message, 1 = error on invalid char\n\\def\\@IEEEgetcoltype#1#2#3{%\n% use only the very first token to determine the type\n\\@IEEEextracttoken{#1}\\relax\n% \\@IEEEextractedtoken has the first token, the rest are discarded\n\\let#2=u\\relax% assume invalid until know otherwise\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\ignorespaces\\let#2=e\\else\n\\ifcat\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\relax\\else% screen out control sequences\n\\if0\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if1\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if2\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if3\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if4\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if5\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if6\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if7\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if8\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if9\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\ifcat,\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=g\\relax\n\\else\\ifcat a\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=c\\relax\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\n\\if#2u\\relax\n\\if0\\noexpand#3\\relax\\else\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Invalid character in column specifications}%\n{Only letters, numerals and certain other symbols are allowed \\MessageBreak\nas IEEEeqnarray column specifiers.}\\fi\\fi}\n\n\n% usage: \\@IEEEgetcurcol{col specifier}\n% verify the letter referenced column exists\n% and return its name in \\@IEEEBPcurcolname\n% if column specifier is invalid, use the default column @IEEEdefault\n\\def\\@IEEEgetcurcol#1{\\expandafter\\ifx\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolDEF#1\\endcsname\\@IEEEeqnarraycolisdefined%\n\\def\\@IEEEBPcurcolname{#1}\\else% invalid column name\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Invalid column type \"#1\" in column specifications.\\MessageBreak\nUsing a default centering column instead}%\n{You must define IEEEeqnarray column types before use.}%\n\\def\\@IEEEBPcurcolname{@IEEEdefault}\\fi}\n\n\n% usage: \\@IEEEgetcurglue{glue specifier}{\\output}\n% identify the predefined (punctuation) glue value\n% and return it in the given output macro\n\\def\\@IEEEgetcurglue#1#2{%\n% ! = \\! (neg small) -0.16667em (-3/18 em)\n% , = \\, (small) 0.16667em ( 3/18 em)\n% : = \\: (med) 0.22222em ( 4/18 em)\n% ; = \\; (large) 0.27778em ( 5/18 em)\n% ' = \\quad 1em\n% \" = \\qquad 2em\n% . = 0.5\\arraycolsep\n% / = \\arraycolsep\n% ? = 2\\arraycolsep\n% * = 1fil\n% + = \\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPcenter\n% - = \\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero\n% Note that all em values are referenced to the math font (textfont2) fontdimen6\n% value for 1em.\n% \n% use only the very first token to determine the type\n\\@IEEEextracttoken{#1}\\relax\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\@empty\\else\n \\typeout{** WARNING: IEEEeqnarray predefined inter-column glue type specifiers after the first in `\\@IEEEextracttokenarg' ignored (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\relax\n\\fi\n% get the math font 1em value\n% LaTeX2e's NFSS2 does not preload the fonts, but \\IEEEeqnarray needs\n% to gain access to the math (\\textfont2) font's spacing parameters.\n% So we create a bogus box here that uses the math font to ensure\n% that \\textfont2 is loaded and ready. If this is not done,\n% the \\textfont2 stuff here may not work.\n% Thanks to Bernd Raichle for his 1997 post on this topic.\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\relax$}}%\n% fontdimen6 has the width of 1em (a quad).\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=\\fontdimen6\\textfont2\\relax%\n% identify the glue value based on the first token\n% we discard anything after the first\n\\if!\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=-0.16667\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\edef#2{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\else\n\\if,\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=0.16667\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\edef#2{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\else\n\\if:\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=0.22222\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\edef#2{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\else\n\\if;\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=0.27778\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\edef#2{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\else\n\\if'\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=1\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\edef#2{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\else\n\\if\"\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=2\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\edef#2{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\else\n\\if.\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=0.5\\arraycolsep\\edef#2{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\else\n\\if/\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\edef#2{\\the\\arraycolsep}\\else\n\\if?\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=2\\arraycolsep\\edef#2{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\else\n\\if *\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\edef#2{0pt plus 1fil minus 0pt}\\else\n\\if+\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\edef#2{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPcenter}\\else\n\\if-\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\edef#2{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero}\\else\n\\edef#2{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero}%\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Invalid predefined inter-column glue type \"#1\" in\\MessageBreak\ncolumn specifications. Using a default value of\\MessageBreak\n0pt instead}%\n{Only !,:;'\"./?*+ and - are valid predefined glue types in the\\MessageBreak \nIEEEeqnarray column specifications.}\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi}\n\n\n% usage: \\@IEEEprocessNcol{digit}\n% process a numerical digit from the column specification\n% and look up the corresponding user defined glue value\n% can transform current type from n to g or a as the user defined glue is acquired\n\\def\\@IEEEprocessNcol#1{\\if\\@IEEEBPprevtype g%\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Back-to-back inter-column glue specifiers in column\\MessageBreak\nspecifications. Ignoring consecutive glue specifiers\\MessageBreak\nafter the first}%\n{You cannot have two or more glue types next to each other\\MessageBreak \nin the IEEEeqnarray column specifications.}%\n\\let\\@IEEEBPcurtype=a% abort this glue, future digits will be discarded\n\\@IEEEBPcurnum=0\\relax%\n\\else% if we previously aborted a glue\n\\if\\@IEEEBPprevtype a\\@IEEEBPcurnum=0\\let\\@IEEEBPcurtype=a%maintain digit abortion\n\\else%acquire this number\n% save the previous type before the numerical digits started\n\\if\\@IEEEBPprevtype n\\else\\let\\@IEEEBPprevsavedtype=\\@IEEEBPprevtype\\fi%\n\\multiply\\@IEEEBPcurnum by 10\\relax%\n\\advance\\@IEEEBPcurnum by #1\\relax% add in number, \\relax is needed to stop TeX's number scan\n\\if\\@IEEEBPnexttype n\\else%close acquisition\n\\expandafter\\ifx\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolSEPDEF\\expandafter\\romannumeral\\number\\@IEEEBPcurnum\\endcsname\\@IEEEeqnarraycolisdefined%\n\\edef\\@IEEEBPcurglue{\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolSEP\\expandafter\\romannumeral\\number\\@IEEEBPcurnum\\endcsname}%\n\\else%user glue not defined\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Invalid user defined inter-column glue type \"\\number\\@IEEEBPcurnum\" in\\MessageBreak\ncolumn specifications. Using a default value of\\MessageBreak\n0pt instead}%\n{You must define all IEEEeqnarray numerical inter-column glue types via\\MessageBreak\n\\string\\IEEEeqnarraydefcolsep \\space before they are used in column specifications.}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEBPcurglue{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero}%\n\\fi% glue defined or not\n\\let\\@IEEEBPcurtype=g% change the type to reflect the acquired glue\n\\let\\@IEEEBPprevtype=\\@IEEEBPprevsavedtype% restore the prev type before this number glue\n\\@IEEEBPcurnum=0\\relax%ready for next acquisition\n\\fi%close acquisition, get glue\n\\fi%discard or acquire number\n\\fi%prevtype glue or not\n}\n\n\n% process an acquired glue\n% add any acquired column/glue pair to the preamble\n\\def\\@IEEEprocessGcol{\\if\\@IEEEBPprevtype a\\let\\@IEEEBPcurtype=a%maintain previous glue abortions\n\\else\n% if this is the start glue, save it, but do nothing else \n% as this is not used in the preamble, but before\n\\if\\@IEEEBPprevtype s\\edef\\@IEEEBPstartglue{\\@IEEEBPcurglue}%\n\\else%not the start glue\n\\if\\@IEEEBPprevtype g%ignore if back to back glues\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Back-to-back inter-column glue specifiers in column\\MessageBreak\nspecifications. Ignoring consecutive glue specifiers\\MessageBreak\nafter the first}%\n{You cannot have two or more glue types next to each other\\MessageBreak \nin the IEEEeqnarray column specifications.}%\n\\let\\@IEEEBPcurtype=a% abort this glue\n\\else% not a back to back glue\n\\if\\@IEEEBPprevtype c\\relax% if the previoustype was a col, add column/glue pair to preamble\n\\ifnum\\@IEEEeqnnumcols>0\\relax\\@IEEEappendtoksA{&}\\fi\n\\toks0={##}%\n% make preamble advance col counter if this environment needs this\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by 1\\relax}\\fi\n% insert the column defintion into the preamble, being careful not to expand\n% the column definition\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\tabskip=\\@IEEEBPcurglue}%\n\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\begingroup\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPRE}%\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\@IEEEBPcurcolname}%\n\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\endcsname}%\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\the\\toks0}%\n\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax%\n\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPOST}%\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\@IEEEBPcurcolname}%\n\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\endcsname\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax%\n\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}%\n\\advance\\@IEEEeqnnumcols by 1\\relax%one more column in the preamble\n\\else% error: non-start glue with no pending column\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Inter-column glue specifier without a prior column\\MessageBreak\ntype in the column specifications. Ignoring this glue\\MessageBreak \nspecifier}%\n{Except for the first and last positions, glue can be placed only\\MessageBreak\nbetween column types.}%\n\\let\\@IEEEBPcurtype=a% abort this glue\n\\fi% previous was a column\n\\fi% back-to-back glues\n\\fi% is start column glue\n\\fi% prev type not a\n}\n\n\n% process an acquired letter referenced column and, if necessary, add it to the preamble\n\\def\\@IEEEprocessCcol{\\if\\@IEEEBPnexttype g\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEBPnexttype n\\else\n% we have a column followed by something other than a glue (or numeral glue)\n% so we must add this column to the preamble now\n\\ifnum\\@IEEEeqnnumcols>0\\relax\\@IEEEappendtoksA{&}\\fi%col separator for those after the first\n\\if\\@IEEEBPnexttype e\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\tabskip=\\@IEEEBPendglue\\relax}\\else%put in end glue\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\tabskip=\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultmid\\relax}\\fi% or default mid glue\n\\toks0={##}%\n% make preamble advance col counter if this environment needs this\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by 1\\relax}\\fi\n% insert the column definition into the preamble, being careful not to expand\n% the column definition\n\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\begingroup\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPRE}%\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\@IEEEBPcurcolname}%\n\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\endcsname}%\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\the\\toks0}%\n\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax%\n\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPOST}%\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\@IEEEBPcurcolname}%\n\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\endcsname\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax%\n\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}%\n\\advance\\@IEEEeqnnumcols by 1\\relax%one more column in the preamble\n\\fi%next type not numeral\n\\fi%next type not glue\n}\n\n\n%%\n%% END OF IEEEeqnarray DEFINITIONS\n%%\n\n\n\n\n\n% set up the running headers and footers\n%\n% header and footer font and size specifications\n\\def\\@IEEEheaderstyle{\\normalfont\\scriptsize}\n\\def\\@IEEEfooterstyle{\\normalfont\\scriptsize}\n%\n% compsoc uses sans-serif headers and footers\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\def\\@IEEEheaderstyle{\\normalfont\\sffamily\\scriptsize}\n \\def\\@IEEEfooterstyle{\\normalfont\\sffamily\\scriptsize}\n\\fi\n\n\n% standard page style, ps@headings\n\\def\\ps@headings{% default to standard twoside headers, no footers\n% will change later if the mode requires otherwise\n\\def\\@oddhead{\\hbox{}\\@IEEEheaderstyle\\rightmark\\hfil\\thepage}\\relax\n\\def\\@evenhead{\\@IEEEheaderstyle\\thepage\\hfil\\leftmark\\hbox{}}\\relax\n\\let\\@oddfoot\\@empty\n\\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote\n % technote twoside\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\hbox{}\\@IEEEheaderstyle\\leftmark\\hfil\\thepage}\\relax\n \\def\\@evenhead{\\@IEEEheaderstyle\\thepage\\hfil\\leftmark\\hbox{}}\\relax\n\\fi\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls\n % draft footers\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\@date\\hfil DRAFT}\\relax\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\@IEEEfooterstyle DRAFT\\hfil\\@date}\\relax\n\\fi\n% oneside\n\\if@twoside\\else\n % standard one side headers\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\hbox{}\\@IEEEheaderstyle\\leftmark\\hfil\\thepage}\\relax\n \\let\\@evenhead\\@empty\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls\n % oneside draft footers\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\@date\\hfil DRAFT}\\relax\n \\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n \\fi\n\\fi\n% turn off headers for conferences\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n \\let\\@oddhead\\@empty\n \\let\\@evenhead\\@empty\n\\fi\n% turn off footers for draftclsnofoot\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofoot\n \\let\\@oddfoot\\@empty\n \\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n\\fi}\n\n\n% title page style, ps@IEEEtitlepagestyle\n\\def\\ps@IEEEtitlepagestyle{% default title page headers, no footers\n\\def\\@oddhead{\\hbox{}\\@IEEEheaderstyle\\leftmark\\hfil\\thepage}\\relax\n\\def\\@evenhead{\\@IEEEheaderstyle\\thepage\\hfil\\leftmark\\hbox{}}\\relax\n\\let\\@oddfoot\\@empty\n\\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n% will change later if the mode requires otherwise\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls\n % draft footers\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofoot\\else\n % but only if not draftclsnofoot\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\@date\\hfil DRAFT}\\relax\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\@IEEEfooterstyle DRAFT\\hfil\\@date}\\relax\n \\fi\n\\else\n % all nondraft mode footers\n \\if@IEEEusingpubid\n % for title pages that are using a pubid\n % do not repeat pubid on the title page if using a peer review cover page\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview\\else\n % for noncompsoc papers, the pubid uses footnotesize and\n % is at the same vertical position as where the last baseline would normally be\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\hbox{}\\hss\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\footnotesize\\raisebox{\\footskip}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEpubid}\\hss\\hbox{}}\\relax\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\hbox{}\\hss\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\footnotesize\\raisebox{\\footskip}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEpubid}\\hss\\hbox{}}\\relax\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n % for compsoc papers, the pubid is at the same vertical position as the normal footer\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\hbox{}\\hss\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\raisebox{0pt}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEpubid}\\hss\\hbox{}}\\relax\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\hbox{}\\hss\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\raisebox{0pt}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEpubid}\\hss\\hbox{}}\\relax\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi\n% turn off headers for conferences\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n \\let\\@oddhead\\@empty\n \\let\\@evenhead\\@empty\n\\fi}\n\n\n% peer review cover page style, ps@IEEEpeerreviewcoverpagestyle\n\\def\\ps@IEEEpeerreviewcoverpagestyle{% default peer review cover no headers, no footers\n\\let\\@oddhead\\@empty\n\\let\\@evenhead\\@empty\n\\let\\@oddfoot\\@empty\n\\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n% will change later if the mode requires otherwise\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls\n % draft footers\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofoot\\else\n % but only if not draftclsnofoot\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\@date\\hfil DRAFT}\\relax\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\@IEEEfooterstyle DRAFT\\hfil\\@date}\\relax\n \\fi\n\\else\n % all nondraft mode footers\n \\if@IEEEusingpubid\n % for peer review cover pages that are using a pubid\n % for noncompsoc papers, the pubid uses footnotesize and\n % is at the same vertical position as where the last baseline would normally be\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\hbox{}\\hss\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\footnotesize\\raisebox{\\footskip}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEpubid}\\hss\\hbox{}}\\relax\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\hbox{}\\hss\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\footnotesize\\raisebox{\\footskip}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEpubid}\\hss\\hbox{}}\\relax\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n % for compsoc papers, the pubid is at the same vertical position as the normal footer\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\hbox{}\\hss\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\raisebox{0pt}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEpubid}\\hss\\hbox{}}\\relax\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\hbox{}\\hss\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\raisebox{0pt}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEpubid}\\hss\\hbox{}}\\relax\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi}\n\n\n\n%% Defines the command for putting the header.\n%% Note that all the text is forced into uppercase, if you have some text\n%% that needs to be in lower case, for instance et. al., then either manually\n%% set \\leftmark and \\rightmark or use \\MakeLowercase{et. al.} within the\n%% arguments to \\markboth.\n%% V1.7b add \\protect to work with Babel\n\\def\\markboth#1#2{\\def\\leftmark{\\MakeUppercase{\\protect#1}}%\n\\def\\rightmark{\\MakeUppercase{\\protect#2}}}\n\n\\def\\today{\\ifcase\\month\\or\n January\\or February\\or March\\or April\\or May\\or June\\or\n July\\or August\\or September\\or October\\or November\\or December\\fi\n \\space\\number\\day, \\number\\year}\n\n\n\n\n%% CITATION AND BIBLIOGRAPHY COMMANDS\n%% \n%% V1.6 no longer supports the older, nonstandard \\shortcite and \\citename setup stuff\n% \n% \n% Modify Latex2e \\@citex to separate citations with \"], [\"\n\\def\\@citex[#1]#2{%\n \\let\\@citea\\@empty\n \\@cite{\\@for\\@citeb:=#2\\do\n {\\@citea\\def\\@citea{], [}%\n \\edef\\@citeb{\\expandafter\\@firstofone\\@citeb\\@empty}%\n \\if@filesw\\immediate\\write\\@auxout{\\string\\citation{\\@citeb}}\\fi\n \\@ifundefined{b@\\@citeb}{\\mbox{\\reset@font\\bfseries ?}%\n \\G@refundefinedtrue\n \\@latex@warning\n {Citation `\\@citeb' on page \\thepage \\space undefined}}%\n {\\hbox{\\csname b@\\@citeb\\endcsname}}}}{#1}}\n\n% V1.6 we create hooks for the optional use of Donald Arseneau's\n% cite.sty package. cite.sty is \"smart\" and will notice that the\n% following format controls are already defined and will not\n% redefine them. The result will be the proper sorting of the\n% citation numbers and auto detection of 3 or more entry \"ranges\" -\n% all in IEEE style: [1], [2], [5]--[7], [12]\n% This also allows for an optional note, i.e., \\cite[mynote]{..}.\n% If the \\cite with note has more than one reference, the note will\n% be applied to the last of the listed references. It is generally\n% desired that if a note is given, only one reference is listed in\n% that \\cite.\n% Thanks to Mr. Arseneau for providing the required format arguments\n% to produce the IEEE style.\n\\def\\citepunct{], [}\n\\def\\citedash{]--[}\n\n% V1.7 default to using same font for urls made by url.sty\n\\AtBeginDocument{\\csname url@samestyle\\endcsname}\n\n% V1.6 class files should always provide these\n\\def\\newblock{\\hskip .11em\\@plus.33em\\@minus.07em}\n\\let\\@openbib@code\\@empty\n% V1.8b article.cls is now providing these too\n% we do not use \\@mkboth, nor alter the page style\n\\newenvironment{theindex}\n {\\if@twocolumn\n \\@restonecolfalse\n \\else\n \\@restonecoltrue\n \\fi\n \\twocolumn[\\section*{\\indexname}]%\n \\parindent\\z@\n \\parskip\\z@ \\@plus .3\\p@\\relax\n \\columnseprule \\z@\n \\columnsep 35\\p@\n \\let\\item\\@idxitem}\n {\\if@restonecol\\onecolumn\\else\\clearpage\\fi}\n\\newcommand\\@idxitem{\\par\\hangindent 40\\p@}\n\\newcommand\\subitem{\\@idxitem \\hspace*{20\\p@}}\n\\newcommand\\subsubitem{\\@idxitem \\hspace*{30\\p@}}\n\\newcommand\\indexspace{\\par \\vskip 10\\p@ \\@plus5\\p@ \\@minus3\\p@\\relax}\n\n\n\n% Provide support for the control entries of IEEEtran.bst V1.00 and later.\n% V1.7 optional argument allows for a different aux file to be specified in\n% order to handle multiple bibliographies. For example, with multibib.sty:\n% \\newcites{sec}{Secondary Literature}\n% \\bstctlcite[@auxoutsec]{BSTcontrolhak}\n\\def\\bstctlcite{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@bstctlcite}{\\@bstctlcite[@auxout]}}\n\\def\\@bstctlcite[#1]#2{\\@bsphack\n \\@for\\@citeb:=#2\\do{%\n \\edef\\@citeb{\\expandafter\\@firstofone\\@citeb}%\n \\if@filesw\\immediate\\write\\csname #1\\endcsname{\\string\\citation{\\@citeb}}\\fi}%\n \\@esphack}\n\n% \\IEEEnoauxwrite{} allows for citations that do not add to or affect\n% the order of the existing citation list. Can be useful for \\cite\n% within \\thanks{}.\n\\DeclareRobustCommand{\\IEEEnoauxwrite}[1]{\\relax\n\\if@filesw\n\\@fileswfalse\n#1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\n\\@fileswtrue\n\\else\n#1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\n\\fi}\n\n% V1.6 provide a way for a user to execute a command just before \n% a given reference number - used to insert a \\newpage to balance\n% the columns on the last page\n\\edef\\@IEEEtriggerrefnum{0} % the default of zero means that\n % the command is not executed\n\\def\\@IEEEtriggercmd{\\newpage}\n\n% allow the user to alter the triggered command\n\\long\\def\\IEEEtriggercmd#1{\\long\\def\\@IEEEtriggercmd{#1}}\n\n% allow user a way to specify the reference number just before the\n% command is executed\n\\def\\IEEEtriggeratref#1{\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA=#1%\n\\edef\\@IEEEtriggerrefnum{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA}}%\n\n% trigger command at the given reference\n\\def\\@IEEEbibitemprefix{\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA=\\@IEEEtriggerrefnum\\relax%\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA by -1\\relax%\n\\ifnum\\c@enumiv=\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA\\relax\\@IEEEtriggercmd\\relax\\fi}\n\n\n\\def\\@biblabel#1{[#1]}\n\n% compsoc journals and conferences left align the reference numbers\n\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\def\\@biblabel#1{[#1]\\hfill}}\n\n% controls bib item spacing\n\\def\\IEEEbibitemsep{0pt plus .5pt}\n\n\\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\def\\IEEEbibitemsep{0.5\\baselineskip plus 0.25\\baselineskip minus 0.25\\baselineskip}}\n\n\n\\def\\thebibliography#1{\\section*{\\refname}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\\refname}%\n % V1.6 add some rubber space here and provide a command trigger\n \\footnotesize\\vskip 0.3\\baselineskip plus 0.1\\baselineskip minus 0.1\\baselineskip%\n \\list{\\@biblabel{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n {\\settowidth\\labelwidth{\\@biblabel{#1}}%\n \\leftmargin\\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\labelsep\\relax\n \\itemsep \\IEEEbibitemsep\\relax\n \\usecounter{enumiv}%\n \\let\\p@enumiv\\@empty\n \\renewcommand\\theenumiv{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n \\let\\@IEEElatexbibitem\\bibitem%\n \\def\\bibitem{\\@IEEEbibitemprefix\\@IEEElatexbibitem}%\n\\def\\newblock{\\hskip .11em plus .33em minus .07em}%\n% originally:\n% \\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000%\n% by adding the \\interlinepenalty here, we make it more\n% difficult, but not impossible, for LaTeX to break within a reference.\n% The IEEE almost never breaks a reference (but they do it more often with\n% technotes). You may get an underfull vbox warning around the bibliography, \n% but the final result will be much more like what the IEEE will publish. \n% MDS 11/2000\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote\\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000\\interlinepenalty100%\n\\else\\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000\\interlinepenalty500\\fi%\n \\sfcode`\\.=1000\\relax}\n\\let\\endthebibliography=\\endlist\n\n\n\n\n% TITLE PAGE COMMANDS\n% \n% \n% \\IEEEmembership is used to produce the sublargesize italic font used to indicate author \n% IEEE membership. compsoc uses a large size sans slant font\n\\def\\IEEEmembership#1{{\\@IEEEnotcompsoconly{\\sublargesize}\\normalfont\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\sffamily}\\textit{#1}}}\n \n\n% \\IEEEauthorrefmark{} produces a footnote type symbol to indicate author affiliation.\n% When given an argument of 1 to 9, \\IEEEauthorrefmark{} follows the standard LaTeX footnote\n% symbol sequence convention. However, for arguments 10 and above, \\IEEEauthorrefmark{} \n% reverts to using lower case roman numerals, so it cannot overflow. Do note that you \n% cannot use \\footnotemark[] in place of \\IEEEauthorrefmark{} within \\author as the footnote\n% symbols will have been turned off to prevent \\thanks from creating footnote marks.\n% \\IEEEauthorrefmark{} produces a symbol that appears to LaTeX as having zero vertical\n% height - this allows for a more compact line packing, but the user must ensure that\n% the interline spacing is large enough to prevent \\IEEEauthorrefmark{} from colliding\n% with the text above.\n% V1.7 make this a robust command\n% V1.8 transmag uses an arabic author affiliation symbol\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\n\\DeclareRobustCommand*{\\IEEEauthorrefmark}[1]{\\raisebox{0pt}[0pt][0pt]{\\textsuperscript{\\footnotesize #1}}}\n\\else\n\\DeclareRobustCommand*{\\IEEEauthorrefmark}[1]{\\raisebox{0pt}[0pt][0pt]{\\textsuperscript{\\footnotesize\\ensuremath{\\ifcase#1\\or *\\or \\dagger\\or \\ddagger\\or%\n \\mathsection\\or \\mathparagraph\\or \\|\\or **\\or \\dagger\\dagger%\n \\or \\ddagger\\ddagger \\else\\textsuperscript{\\expandafter\\romannumeral#1}\\fi}}}}\n\\fi\n\n\n% FONT CONTROLS AND SPACINGS FOR CONFERENCE MODE AUTHOR NAME AND AFFILIATION BLOCKS\n% \n% The default font styles for the author name and affiliation blocks (confmode)\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockNstyle{\\normalfont\\@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly{\\sffamily}\\sublargesize}\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockAstyle{\\normalfont\\@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly{\\sffamily}\\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\itshape}\\normalsize}\n% The default if the user does not use an author block\n\\def\\@IEEEauthordefaulttextstyle{\\normalfont\\@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly{\\sffamily}\\sublargesize}\n\n% adjustment spacing from title (or special paper notice) to author name blocks (confmode)\n% can be negative\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockconfadjspace{-0.25em}\n% compsoc conferences need more space here\n\\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockconfadjspace{0.75\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}}\n\n% spacing between name and affiliation blocks (confmode)\n% This can be negative.\n% The IEEE doesn't want any added spacing here, but I will leave these\n% controls in place in case they ever change their mind.\n% Personally, I like 0.75ex.\n%\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockNtopspace{0.75ex}\n%\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockAtopspace{0.75ex}\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockNtopspace{0.0ex}\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockAtopspace{0.0ex}\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\n% transmag uses one line of space above first affiliation block\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockAtopspace{1\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}\n\\fi\n\n% baseline spacing within name and affiliation blocks (confmode)\n% must be positive, spacings below certain values will make \n% the position of line of text sensitive to the contents of the\n% line above it i.e., whether or not the prior line has descenders, \n% subscripts, etc. For this reason it is a good idea to keep\n% these above 2.6ex\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockNinterlinespace{2.6ex}\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockAinterlinespace{2.75ex}\n\n% This tracks the required strut size.\n% See the \\@IEEEauthorhalign command for the actual default value used.\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockXinterlinespace{2.7ex}\n\n% variables to retain font size and style across groups\n% values given here have no effect as they will be overwritten later\n\\gdef\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontsize{10}\n\\gdef\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontbaselineskip{12}\n\\gdef\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontencoding{OT1}\n\\gdef\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontfamily{ptm}\n\\gdef\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontseries{m}\n\\gdef\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontshape{n}\n\n% saves the current font attributes\n\\def\\@IEEEcurfontSAVE{\\global\\let\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontsize\\f@size%\n\\global\\let\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontbaselineskip\\f@baselineskip%\n\\global\\let\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontencoding\\f@encoding%\n\\global\\let\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontfamily\\f@family%\n\\global\\let\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontseries\\f@series%\n\\global\\let\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontshape\\f@shape}\n\n% restores the saved font attributes\n\\def\\@IEEEcurfontRESTORE{\\fontsize{\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontsize}{\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontbaselineskip}%\n\\fontencoding{\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontencoding}%\n\\fontfamily{\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontfamily}%\n\\fontseries{\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontseries}%\n\\fontshape{\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontshape}%\n\\selectfont}\n\n\n% variable to indicate if the current block is the first block in the column\n\\newif\\if@IEEEprevauthorblockincol \\@IEEEprevauthorblockincolfalse\n\n\n% the command places a strut with height and depth = \\@IEEEauthorblockXinterlinespace\n% we use this technique to have complete manual control over the spacing of the lines\n% within the halign environment.\n% We set the below baseline portion at 30%, the above\n% baseline portion at 70% of the total length.\n% Responds to changes in the document's \\baselinestretch\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorstrutrule{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\@IEEEauthorblockXinterlinespace%\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=\\baselinestretch\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA%\n\\rule[-0.3\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA]{0pt}{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}}\n\n\n% blocks to hold the authors' names and affilations. \n% Makes formatting easy for conferences\n%\n% use real definitions in conference mode\n% name block\n\\def\\IEEEauthorblockN#1{\\relax\\@IEEEauthorblockNstyle% set the default text style\n\\gdef\\@IEEEauthorblockXinterlinespace{0pt}% disable strut for spacer row\n% the \\expandafter hides the \\cr in conditional tex, see the array.sty docs\n% for details, probably not needed here as the \\cr is in a macro\n% do a spacer row if needed\n\\if@IEEEprevauthorblockincol\\expandafter\\@IEEEauthorblockNtopspaceline\\fi\n\\global\\@IEEEprevauthorblockincoltrue% we now have a block in this column\n%restore the correct strut value\n\\gdef\\@IEEEauthorblockXinterlinespace{\\@IEEEauthorblockNinterlinespace}%\n% input the author names\n#1%\n% end the row if the user did not already\n\\crcr}\n% spacer row for names\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockNtopspaceline{\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip\\@IEEEauthorblockNtopspace}}\n%\n% affiliation block\n\\def\\IEEEauthorblockA#1{\\relax\\@IEEEauthorblockAstyle% set the default text style\n\\gdef\\@IEEEauthorblockXinterlinespace{0pt}%disable strut for spacer row\n% the \\expandafter hides the \\cr in conditional tex, see the array.sty docs\n% for details, probably not needed here as the \\cr is in a macro\n% do a spacer row if needed\n\\if@IEEEprevauthorblockincol\\expandafter\\@IEEEauthorblockAtopspaceline\\fi\n\\global\\@IEEEprevauthorblockincoltrue% we now have a block in this column\n%restore the correct strut value\n\\gdef\\@IEEEauthorblockXinterlinespace{\\@IEEEauthorblockAinterlinespace}%\n% input the author affiliations\n#1%\n% end the row if the user did not already\n\\crcr\n% V1.8 transmag does not use any additional affiliation spacing after the first author\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\\gdef\\@IEEEauthorblockAtopspace{0pt}\\fi}\n\n% spacer row for affiliations\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockAtopspaceline{\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip\\@IEEEauthorblockAtopspace}}\n\n\n% allow papers to compile even if author blocks are used in modes other\n% than conference or peerreviewca. For such cases, we provide dummy blocks.\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n\\else\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreviewca\\else\n % not conference, peerreviewca or transmag mode\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\\else\n \\def\\IEEEauthorblockN#1{#1}%\n \\def\\IEEEauthorblockA#1{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% we provide our own halign so as not to have to depend on tabular\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorhalign{\\@IEEEauthordefaulttextstyle% default text style\n \\lineskip=0pt\\relax% disable line spacing\n \\lineskiplimit=0pt\\relax%\n \\baselineskip=0pt\\relax%\n \\@IEEEcurfontSAVE% save the current font\n \\mathsurround\\z@\\relax% no extra spacing around math\n \\let\\\\\\@IEEEauthorhaligncr% replace newline with halign friendly one\n \\tabskip=0pt\\relax% no column spacing\n \\everycr{}% ensure no problems here\n \\@IEEEprevauthorblockincolfalse% no author blocks yet\n \\def\\@IEEEauthorblockXinterlinespace{2.7ex}% default interline space\n \\vtop\\bgroup%vtop box\n \\halign\\bgroup&\\relax\\hfil\\@IEEEcurfontRESTORE\\relax ##\\relax\n \\hfil\\@IEEEcurfontSAVE\\@IEEEauthorstrutrule\\cr}\n\n% ensure last line, exit from halign, close vbox\n\\def\\end@IEEEauthorhalign{\\crcr\\egroup\\egroup}\n\n% handle bogus star form\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorhaligncr{{\\ifnum0=`}\\fi\\@ifstar{\\@@IEEEauthorhaligncr}{\\@@IEEEauthorhaligncr}}\n\n% test and setup the optional argument to \\\\[]\n\\def\\@@IEEEauthorhaligncr{\\@testopt\\@@@IEEEauthorhaligncr\\z@skip}\n\n% end the line and do the optional spacer\n\\def\\@@@IEEEauthorhaligncr[#1]{\\ifnum0=`{\\fi}\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip#1\\relax}}\n\n\n\n% flag to prevent multiple \\and warning messages\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNand\n\\@IEEEWARNandtrue\n\n% if in conference or peerreviewca modes, we support the use of \\and as \\author is a\n% tabular environment, otherwise we warn the user that \\and is invalid\n% outside of conference or peerreviewca modes.\n\\def\\and{\\relax} % provide a bogus \\and that we will then override\n\n\\renewcommand{\\and}[1][\\relax]{\\if@IEEEWARNand\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\and is valid only\n when in conference or peerreviewca}\\typeout{modes (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNandfalse}\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference%\n\\renewcommand{\\and}[1][\\hfill]{\\end{@IEEEauthorhalign}#1\\begin{@IEEEauthorhalign}}%\n\\fi\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreviewca\n\\renewcommand{\\and}[1][\\hfill]{\\end{@IEEEauthorhalign}#1\\begin{@IEEEauthorhalign}}%\n\\fi\n% V1.8 transmag uses conference author format\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\n\\renewcommand{\\and}[1][\\hfill]{\\end{@IEEEauthorhalign}#1\\begin{@IEEEauthorhalign}}%\n\\fi\n\n% page clearing command\n% based on LaTeX2e's \\cleardoublepage, but allows different page styles\n% for the inserted blank pages\n\\def\\@IEEEcleardoublepage#1{\\clearpage\\if@twoside\\ifodd\\c@page\\else\n\\hbox{}\\thispagestyle{#1}\\newpage\\if@twocolumn\\hbox{}\\thispagestyle{#1}\\newpage\\fi\\fi\\fi}\n\n% V1.8b hooks to allow adjustment of space above title\n\\def\\IEEEtitletopspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\n% an added extra amount to allow for adjustment/offset\n\\def\\IEEEtitletopspaceextra{0pt}\n\n% user command to invoke the title page\n\\def\\maketitle{\\par%\n \\begingroup%\n \\normalfont%\n \\def\\thefootnote{}% the \\thanks{} mark type is empty\n \\def\\footnotemark{}% and kill space from \\thanks within author\n \\let\\@makefnmark\\relax% V1.7, must *really* kill footnotemark to remove all \\textsuperscript spacing as well.\n \\footnotesize% equal spacing between thanks lines\n \\footnotesep 0.7\\baselineskip%see global setting of \\footnotesep for more info\n % V1.7 disable \\thanks note indention for compsoc\n \\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\long\\def\\@makefntext##1{\\parindent 1em\\noindent\\hbox{\\@makefnmark}##1}}%\n \\normalsize%\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview\n \\newpage\\global\\@topnum\\z@ \\@maketitle\\@IEEEstatictitlevskip\\@IEEEaftertitletext%\n \\thispagestyle{IEEEpeerreviewcoverpagestyle}\\@thanks%\n \\else\n \\if@twocolumn%\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote%\n \\newpage\\global\\@topnum\\z@ \\@maketitle\\@IEEEstatictitlevskip\\@IEEEaftertitletext%\n \\else\n \\twocolumn[{\\IEEEquantizevspace{\\@maketitle}[\\IEEEquantizedisabletitlecmds]{0pt}[-\\topskip]{\\baselineskip}{\\@IEEENORMtitlevspace}{\\@IEEEMINtitlevspace}\\@IEEEaftertitletext}]%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\newpage\\global\\@topnum\\z@ \\@maketitle\\@IEEEstatictitlevskip\\@IEEEaftertitletext%\n \\fi\n \\thispagestyle{IEEEtitlepagestyle}\\@thanks%\n \\fi\n % pullup page for pubid if used.\n \\if@IEEEusingpubid\n \\enlargethispage{-\\@IEEEpubidpullup}%\n \\fi \n \\endgroup\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}\\let\\maketitle\\relax\\let\\@maketitle\\relax\n \\gdef\\@thanks{}%\n % v1.6b do not clear these as we will need the title again for peer review papers\n % \\gdef\\@author{}\\gdef\\@title{}%\n \\let\\thanks\\relax}\n\n\n% V1.8 parbox to format \\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext\n\\long\\def\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextextbox#1{\\parbox{1\\textwidth}{#1}}\n% V1.8 compsoc is partial width\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n% comparison with proofs suggests it's in the range of 92.1-92.3%\n\\long\\def\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextextbox#1{\\parbox{0.922\\textwidth}{\\@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly{\\rightskip\\@flushglue\\leftskip\\z@skip}#1}}\n\\fi\n\n% formats the Title, authors names, affiliations and special paper notice\n% THIS IS A CONTROLLED SPACING COMMAND! Do not allow blank lines or unintentional\n% spaces to enter the definition - use % at the end of each line\n\\def\\@maketitle{\\newpage\n\\bgroup\\par\\vskip\\IEEEtitletopspace\\vskip\\IEEEtitletopspaceextra\\centering%\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote% technotes, V1.8a abstract and index terms are not treated differently for compsoc technotes\n {\\bfseries\\large\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\Large\\sffamily}\\@title\\par}\\vskip 1.3em{\\lineskip .5em\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\large\\sffamily}\\@author\n \\@IEEEspecialpapernotice\\par}\\relax\n\\else% not a technote\n \\vskip0.2em{\\Huge\\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\\bfseries\\LARGE\\fi\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\sffamily}\\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\vskip 2\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\n \\bfseries\\Large}\\@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly{\\vskip 0.75\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}\\@title\\par}\\relax\n \\@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly{\\vskip 0.5\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}\\vskip1.0em\\par%\n % V1.6 handle \\author differently if in conference mode\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONconference%\n {\\@IEEEspecialpapernotice\\mbox{}\\vskip\\@IEEEauthorblockconfadjspace%\n \\mbox{}\\hfill\\begin{@IEEEauthorhalign}\\@author\\end{@IEEEauthorhalign}\\hfill\\mbox{}\\par}\\relax\n \\else% peerreviewca, peerreview or journal\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreviewca\n % peerreviewca handles author names just like conference mode\n {\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\sffamily}\\@IEEEspecialpapernotice\\mbox{}\\vskip\\@IEEEauthorblockconfadjspace%\n \\mbox{}\\hfill\\begin{@IEEEauthorhalign}\\@author\\end{@IEEEauthorhalign}\\hfill\\mbox{}\\par\n {\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\vskip 1.5em\\relax\n \\@IEEEtitleabstractindextextbox{\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext}\\par\\noindent\\hfill\n \\IEEEcompsocdiamondline\\hfill\\hbox{}\\par}}}\\relax\n \\else% journal, peerreview or transmag\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\n % transmag also handles author names just like conference mode\n % it also uses \\@IEEEtitleabstractindextex, but with one line less\n % space above, and one more below\n {\\@IEEEspecialpapernotice\\mbox{}\\vskip\\@IEEEauthorblockconfadjspace%\n \\mbox{}\\hfill\\begin{@IEEEauthorhalign}\\@author\\end{@IEEEauthorhalign}\\hfill\\mbox{}\\par\n {\\vspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\relax\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextextbox{\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext}\\vspace{-1\\baselineskip}\\par}}\\relax\n \\else% journal or peerreview\n {\\lineskip.5em\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\sffamily}\\sublargesize\\@author\\@IEEEspecialpapernotice\\par\n {\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\vskip 1.5em\\relax\n \\@IEEEtitleabstractindextextbox{\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext}\\par\\noindent\\hfill\n \\IEEEcompsocdiamondline\\hfill\\hbox{}\\par}}}\\relax\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup}\n\n\n% V1.7 Computer Society \"diamond line\" which follows index terms for nonconference papers\n% V1.8a full width diamond line for single column use\n\\def\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlinei{\\vrule depth 0pt height 0.5pt width 4cm\\nobreak\\hspace{7.5pt}\\nobreak\n\\raisebox{-3.5pt}{\\fontfamily{pzd}\\fontencoding{U}\\fontseries{m}\\fontshape{n}\\fontsize{11}{12}\\selectfont\\char70}\\nobreak\n\\hspace{7.5pt}\\nobreak\\vrule depth 0pt height 0.5pt width 4cm\\relax}\n% V1.8a narrower width diamond line for double column use\n\\def\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlineii{\\vrule depth 0pt height 0.5pt width 2.5cm\\nobreak\\hspace{7.5pt}\\nobreak\n\\raisebox{-3.5pt}{\\fontfamily{pzd}\\fontencoding{U}\\fontseries{m}\\fontshape{n}\\fontsize{11}{12}\\selectfont\\char70}\\nobreak\n\\hspace{7.5pt}\\nobreak\\vrule depth 0pt height 0.5pt width 2.5cm\\relax}\n% V1.8a bare core without rules to base a last resort on for very narrow linewidths\n\\def\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlineiii{\\mbox{}\\nobreak\\hspace{7.5pt}\\nobreak\n\\raisebox{-3.5pt}{\\fontfamily{pzd}\\fontencoding{U}\\fontseries{m}\\fontshape{n}\\fontsize{11}{12}\\selectfont\\char70}\\nobreak\n\\hspace{7.5pt}\\nobreak\\mbox{}\\relax}\n\n% V1.8a allow \\IEEEcompsocdiamondline to adjust for different linewidths.\n% Use \\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlinei if its width is less than 0.66\\linewidth (0.487 nominal for single column)\n% if not, fall back to \\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlineii if its width is less than 0.75\\linewidth (0.659 nominal for double column)\n% if all else fails, try to make a custom diamondline based on the abnormally narrow linewidth\n\\def\\IEEEcompsocdiamondline{\\settowidth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlinei}\\relax\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA<0.66\\linewidth\\relax\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlinei\\relax\n\\else\n\\settowidth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlineii}\\relax\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA<0.75\\linewidth\\relax\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlineii\\relax\n\\else\n\\settowidth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlineiii}\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB=\\linewidth\\relax\n\\addtolength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}{-1\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\relax\n\\vrule depth 0pt height 0.5pt width 0.33\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlineiii\\vrule depth 0pt height 0.5pt width 0.33\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax\n\\fi\\fi}\n\n\n% V1.7 standard LateX2e \\thanks, but with \\itshape under compsoc. Also make it a \\long\\def\n% We also need to trigger the one-shot footnote rule\n\\def\\@IEEEtriggeroneshotfootnoterule{\\global\\@IEEEenableoneshotfootnoteruletrue}\n\n\n\\long\\def\\thanks#1{\\footnotemark\n \\protected@xdef\\@thanks{\\@thanks\n \\protect\\footnotetext[\\the\\c@footnote]{\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\itshape\n \\protect\\@IEEEtriggeroneshotfootnoterule\\relax}\\ignorespaces#1}}}\n\\let\\@thanks\\@empty\n\n\n% V1.7 allow \\author to contain \\par's. This is needed to allow \\thanks to contain \\par.\n\\long\\def\\author#1{\\gdef\\@author{#1}}\n\n\n% in addition to setting up IEEEitemize, we need to remove a baselineskip space above and\n% below it because \\list's \\pars introduce blank lines because of the footnote struts.\n\\def\\@IEEEsetupcompsocitemizelist{\\def\\labelitemi{$\\bullet$}%\n\\setlength{\\IEEElabelindent}{0pt}\\setlength{\\labelsep}{1.2em}\\setlength{\\parskip}{0pt}%\n\\setlength{\\partopsep}{0pt}\\setlength{\\topsep}{0.5\\baselineskip}\\vspace{-1\\baselineskip}\\relax}\n\n\n% flag for fake non-compsoc \\IEEEcompsocthanksitem - prevents line break on very first item\n\\newif\\if@IEEEbreakcompsocthanksitem \\@IEEEbreakcompsocthanksitemfalse\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n% V1.7 compsoc bullet item \\thanks\n% also, we need to redefine this to destroy the argument in \\IEEEquantizevspace\n\\long\\def\\IEEEcompsocitemizethanks#1{\\relax\\@IEEEbreakcompsocthanksitemfalse\\footnotemark\n \\protected@xdef\\@thanks{\\@thanks\n \\protect\\footnotetext[\\the\\c@footnote]{\\itshape\\protect\\@IEEEtriggeroneshotfootnoterule\n {\\let\\IEEEiedlistdecl\\relax\\protect\\begin{IEEEitemize}[\\protect\\@IEEEsetupcompsocitemizelist]\\ignorespaces#1\\relax\n \\protect\\end{IEEEitemize}}\\protect\\vspace{-1\\baselineskip}}}}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand*{\\IEEEcompsocthanksitem}{\\item}\n\\else\n% non-compsoc, allow for dual compilation via rerouting to normal \\thanks\n\\long\\def\\IEEEcompsocitemizethanks#1{\\thanks{#1}}\n% redirect to \"pseudo-par\" \\hfil\\break\\indent after swallowing [] from \\IEEEcompsocthanksitem[]\n\\DeclareRobustCommand{\\IEEEcompsocthanksitem}{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@IEEEthanksswallowoptionalarg}%\n{\\@IEEEthanksswallowoptionalarg[\\relax]}}\n% be sure and break only after first item, be sure and ignore spaces after optional argument\n\\def\\@IEEEthanksswallowoptionalarg[#1]{\\relax\\if@IEEEbreakcompsocthanksitem\\hfil\\break\n\\indent\\fi\\@IEEEbreakcompsocthanksitemtrue\\ignorespaces}\n\\fi\n\n\n% V1.6b define the \\IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle as needed\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview\n\\def\\IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle{\\@IEEEcleardoublepage{empty}%\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtwocolumn\n\\twocolumn[{\\IEEEquantizevspace{\\@IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle}[\\IEEEquantizedisabletitlecmds]{0pt}[-\\topskip]{\\baselineskip}{\\@IEEENORMtitlevspace}{\\@IEEEMINtitlevspace}}]\n\\else\n\\newpage\\@IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle\\@IEEEstatictitlevskip\n\\fi\n\\thispagestyle{IEEEtitlepagestyle}}\n\\else\n% \\IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle does nothing if peer review option has not been selected\n\\def\\IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle{\\relax}\n\\fi\n\n% peerreview formats the repeated title like the title in journal papers.\n\\def\\@IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle{\\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\sffamily}%\n\\normalfont\\normalsize\\vskip0.2em{\\Huge\\@title\\par}\\vskip1.0em\\par\n\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup}\n\n\n\n% V1.6 \n% this is a static rubber spacer between the title/authors and the main text\n% used for single column text, or when the title appears in the first column\n% of two column text (technotes). \n\\def\\@IEEEstatictitlevskip{{\\normalfont\\normalsize\n% adjust spacing to next text\n% v1.6b handle peer review papers\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview\n% for peer review papers, the same value is used for both title pages\n% regardless of the other paper modes\n \\vskip 1\\baselineskip plus 0.375\\baselineskip minus 0.1875\\baselineskip\n\\else\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONconference% conference\n \\vskip 1\\baselineskip plus 0.375\\baselineskip minus 0.1875\\baselineskip%\n \\else%\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote% technote\n \\vskip 1\\baselineskip plus 0.375\\baselineskip minus 0.1875\\baselineskip%\n \\else% journal uses more space\n \\vskip 2.5\\baselineskip plus 0.75\\baselineskip minus 0.375\\baselineskip%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi}}\n\n\n% set the nominal and minimum values for the quantized title spacer\n% the quantization algorithm will not allow the spacer size to\n% become less than \\@IEEEMINtitlevspace - instead it will be lengthened\n% default to journal values\n\\def\\@IEEENORMtitlevspace{2.5\\baselineskip}\n\\def\\@IEEEMINtitlevspace{2\\baselineskip}\n% conferences and technotes need tighter spacing\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference% conference\n \\def\\@IEEENORMtitlevspace{1\\baselineskip}\n \\def\\@IEEEMINtitlevspace{0.75\\baselineskip}\n\\fi\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote% technote\n \\def\\@IEEENORMtitlevspace{1\\baselineskip}\n \\def\\@IEEEMINtitlevspace{0.75\\baselineskip}\n\\fi\n\n\n% V1.8a\n\\def\\IEEEquantizevspace{\\begingroup\\@ifstar{\\@IEEEquantizevspacestarformtrue\\@IEEEquantizevspace}{\\@IEEEquantizevspacestarformfalse\\@IEEEquantizevspace}}\n% \\IEEEquantizevspace[output dimen register]{object}[object decl]\n% {top baselineskip}\n% [offset][prevdepth][lineskip limit][lineskip]\n% {unit height}{nominal vspace}{minimum vspace}\n%\n% Calculates and creates the vspace needed to make the combined height with\n% the given object an integer multiple of the given unit height. This command\n% is more general than the older \\@IEEEdynamictitlevspace it replaces.\n%\n% The star form has no effect at present, but is reserved for future use.\n%\n% If the optional argument [output dimen register] is given, the calculated\n% vspace height is stored in the given output dimen (or skip) register\n% and no other action is taken, otherwise the object followed by a vspace*\n% of the appropriate height is evaluated/output.\n%\n% The optional object decl (declarations) is code that is evaluated just\n% before the object's height is evaluated. Its intented purpose is to allow\n% for the alteration or disabling of code within the object during internal\n% height evaluation (e.g., \\long\\def\\thanks#1{\\relax} ).\n% This special code is not invoked if/when the object is rendered at the end.\n%\n% The nominal vspace is the target value of the added vspace and the minimum\n% vspace is the lower allowed limit. The vspacer will be the value that achieves\n% integral overall height, in terms of the given unit height, that is closest\n% to the nominal vspace and that is not less than the specified minimum vspace.\n%\n% The line spacing algorithm of TeX is somewhat involved and requires special\n% care with regard to the first line of a vertical list (which is indicated\n% when \\prevdepth is -1000pt or less). top baselineskip specifies the\n% baselineskip or topskip used prior to the object. If the height of the\n% first line of the object is greater than the given top baselineskip, then\n% the top baselineskip is subtracted from the height of the first line and\n% that difference is considered along with the rest of the object height\n% (because the object will be shifted down by an amount = \n% top line height - top baselineskip). Otherwise, the height of the first line\n% of the object is ignored as far as the calculations are concerned.\n% This algorithm is adequate for objects that appear at the top of a page\n% (e.g., titles) where \\topskip spacing is used.\n%\n% However, as explained on page 78 of the TeXbook, interline spacing is more\n% complex when \\baselineskip is being used (indicated by \\prevdepth > \n% -1000pt). The four optional parameters offset, prevdepth, lineskip limit and\n% lineskip are assumed to be equal to be 0pt, \\prevdepth, \\lineskiplimit and\n% \\lineskip, respectively, if they are omitted.\n%\n% The prevdepth is the depth of the line before the object, the lineskip limit\n% specifies how close the top of the object can come to the bottom of the\n% previous line before \\baselineskip is ignored and \\lineskip is inserted\n% between the object and the line above it. Lineskip does not come into\n% play unless the first line of the object is high enough to \"get too close\"\n% (as specified by lineskiplimit) to the line before it. The the prevdepth,\n% lineskip limit, and lineskip optional parameters are not needed for the\n% first object/line on a page (i.e., prevdepth <= -1000pt) where the simplier\n% \\topskip spacing rules are in effect.\n%\n% Offset is a manual adjustment that is added to the height calculations of\n% object irrespective of the value of \\prevdepth. It is useful when the top\n% baselineskip will result in a noninteger unit height object placement even\n% if the object itself has integral height. e.g., a footnotesize baselineskip\n% is used before the object, thus an offset of, say -3pt, can be given as a\n% correction.\n\n% Common combinations of these parameters include:\n%\n% top baselineskip: (and default values for offset, prevdepth, etc.)\n% \\topskip % for objects that appear at the top of a page\n% \\maxdimen % always ignore the height of the top line\n% 0pt % always consider any positive height of the top line\n%\n% for objects to appear inline in normal text:\n% top baselineskip = \\baselineskip\n%\n% set prevdepth = -1000pt and top baselineskip = 0pt to consider the\n% overall height of the object without any other external skip\n% consideration\n\n\\newif\\if@IEEEquantizevspacestarform % flag to indicate star form\n\\newif\\if@IEEEquantizevspaceuseoutdimenreg % flag to indicate output dimen register is to be used\n% Use our own private registers because the object could contain a\n% structure that uses the existing tmp scratch pad registers\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEquantizeprevdepth % need to save this early as can change\n\\newcount\\@IEEEquantizemultiple\n\\newbox\\@IEEEquantizeboxA\n\n\n\\def\\@IEEEquantizevspace{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@IEEEquantizevspaceuseoutdimenregtrue\\@@IEEEquantizevspace}{\\@IEEEquantizevspaceuseoutdimenregfalse\\@@IEEEquantizevspace[]}}\n\n\n\\long\\def\\@@IEEEquantizevspace[#1]#2{\\relax\n% acquire and store\n% #1 optional output dimen register\n% #2 object\n\\edef\\@IEEEquantizeoutdimenreg{#1}\\relax\n% allow for object specifications that contain parameters\n\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA={#2}\\relax\n\\long\\edef\\@IEEEquantizeobject{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA}\\relax\n\\@ifnextchar [{\\@@@IEEEquantizevspace}{\\@@@IEEEquantizevspace[\\relax]}}\n\n\\long\\def\\@@@IEEEquantizevspace[#1]#2{\\relax\n% acquire and store\n% [#1] optional object decl, is \\relax if not given by user\n% #2 top baselineskip\n% allow for object decl specifications that have parameters\n\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA={#1}\\relax\n\\long\\edef\\@IEEEquantizeobjectdecl{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA}\\relax\n\\edef\\@IEEEquantizetopbaselineskip{#2}\\ivIEEEquantizevspace}\n\n% acquire optional argument set and store\n% [offset][prevdepth][lineskip limit][lineskip]\n\\def\\ivIEEEquantizevspace{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@vIEEEquantizevspace}{\\@vIEEEquantizevspace[0pt]}}\n\\def\\@vIEEEquantizevspace[#1]{\\edef\\@IEEEquantizeoffset{#1}\\@ifnextchar [{\\@viIEEEquantizevspace}{\\@viIEEEquantizevspace[\\prevdepth]}}\n\\def\\@viIEEEquantizevspace[#1]{\\@IEEEquantizeprevdepth=#1\\relax\\@ifnextchar [{\\@viiIEEEquantizevspace}{\\@viiIEEEquantizevspace[\\lineskiplimit]}}\n\\def\\@viiIEEEquantizevspace[#1]{\\edef\\@IEEEquantizelineskiplimit{#1}\\@ifnextchar [{\\@viiiIEEEquantizevspace}{\\@viiiIEEEquantizevspace[\\lineskip]}}\n\\def\\@viiiIEEEquantizevspace[#1]{\\edef\\@IEEEquantizelineskip{#1}\\@ixIEEEquantizevspace}\n\n% main routine\n\\def\\@ixIEEEquantizevspace#1#2#3{\\relax\n\\edef\\@IEEEquantizeunitheight{#1}\\relax\n\\edef\\@IEEEquantizenomvspace{#2}\\relax\n\\edef\\@IEEEquantizeminvspace{#3}\\relax\n% \\@IEEEquantizeoutdimenreg\n% \\@IEEEquantizeobject\n% \\@IEEEquantizeobjectdecl\n% \\@IEEEquantizetopbaselineskip\n% \\@IEEEquantizeoffset\n% \\@IEEEquantizeprevdepth\n% \\@IEEEquantizelineskiplimit\n% \\@IEEEquantizelineskip\n% \\@IEEEquantizeunitheight\n% \\@IEEEquantizenomvspace\n% \\@IEEEquantizeminvspace\n% get overall height of object\n\\setbox\\@IEEEquantizeboxA\\vbox{\\begingroup\\@IEEEquantizeobjectdecl\\@IEEEquantizeobject\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\ht\\@IEEEquantizeboxA\\relax\n% get height of first line of object\n\\setbox\\@IEEEquantizeboxA\\vtop{\\begingroup\\@IEEEquantizeobjectdecl\\@IEEEquantizeobject\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\\ht\\@IEEEquantizeboxA\\relax\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEquantizeprevdepth>-1000pt\\relax % prevdepth > -1000pf means full baselineskip\\lineskip rules in effect\n% lineskip spacing rule takes effect if height of top line > baselineskip - prevdepth - lineskiplimit, \n% otherwise the baselineskip rule is in effect and the height of the first line does not matter at all.\n\\@IEEEquantizeheightC=\\@IEEEquantizetopbaselineskip\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightC-\\@IEEEquantizeprevdepth\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightC-\\@IEEEquantizelineskiplimit\\relax % this works even though \\@IEEEquantizelineskiplimit is a macro because TeX allows --10pt notation\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEquantizeheightB>\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\relax\n% lineskip spacing rule is in effect i.e., the object is going to be shifted down relative to the\n% baselineskip set position by its top line height (already a part of the total height) + prevdepth + lineskip - baselineskip\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\@IEEEquantizeprevdepth\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\@IEEEquantizelineskip\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA-\\@IEEEquantizetopbaselineskip\\relax\n\\else\n% height of first line <= \\@IEEEquantizetopbaselineskip - \\@IEEEquantizeprevdepth - \\@IEEEquantizelineskiplimit\n% standard baselineskip rules are in effect, so don't consider height of first line\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA-\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\\relax\n\\fi\n%\n\\else % prevdepth <= -1000pt, simplier \\topskip type rules in effect\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEquantizeheightB>\\@IEEEquantizetopbaselineskip\n% height of top line (already included in the total height) in excess of\n% baselineskip is the amount it will be downshifted\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA-\\@IEEEquantizetopbaselineskip\\relax\n\\else\n% height of first line is irrelevant, remove it\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA-\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\\relax\n\\fi\n\\fi % prevdepth <= -1000pt\n%\n% adjust height for any manual offset\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\@IEEEquantizeoffset\\relax\n% add in nominal spacer\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\@IEEEquantizenomvspace\\relax\n% check for nonzero unitheight\n\\@IEEEquantizeheightB=\\@IEEEquantizeunitheight\\relax\n\\ifnum\\@IEEEquantizeheightB=0\\relax\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{IEEEquantizevspace unit height cannot be zero. Assuming 10pt.}%\n{Division by zero is not allowed.}\n\\@IEEEquantizeheightB=10pt\\relax\n\\fi\n% get integer number of lines\n\\@IEEEquantizemultiple=\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\relax\n\\divide\\@IEEEquantizemultiple\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\\relax\n% set A to contain the excess height over the \\@IEEEquantizemultiple of lines\n% A = height - multiple*unitheight\n\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\\relax\n\\multiply\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\@IEEEquantizemultiple\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA-\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\relax\n% set B to contain the height short of \\@IEEEquantizemultiple+1 of lines\n% B = unitheight - A\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightB-\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\relax\n% choose A or B based on which is closer\n\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\@IEEEquantizenomvspace\\relax\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEquantizeheightA<\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\\relax\n% C = nomvspace - A, go with lower\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightC-\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\relax\n\\else\n% C = nomvspace + B, go with upper\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\\relax\n\\fi\n% if violate lower bound, use next integer bound\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEquantizeheightC<\\@IEEEquantizeminvspace\\relax\n% A + B = unitheight\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\\relax\n\\fi\n% export object and spacer outside of group\n\\global\\let\\@IEEEquantizeobjectout\\@IEEEquantizeobject\\relax\n\\global\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\relax\n\\endgroup\n\\if@IEEEquantizevspaceuseoutdimenreg\n\\@IEEEquantizeoutdimenreg=\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\relax\n\\else\n\\@IEEEquantizeobjectout\\relax\n\\vskip\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\relax\n\\fi}\n\n\n% user command to disable all global assignments, possible use within object decl\n\\def\\IEEEquantizedisableglobal{\\let\\global\\relax\n\\let\\gdef\\def\n\\let\\xdef\\edef}\n% user command to allow for the disabling of \\thanks and other commands, possible use within object decl\n\\def\\IEEEquantizedisabletitlecmds{\\long\\def\\thanks##1{\\relax}\\relax\n\\long\\def\\IEEEcompsocitemizethanks##1{\\relax}\\def\\newpage{\\relax}}\n\n\n\n\n\n% V1.6\n% we allow the user access to the last part of the title area\n% useful in emergencies such as when a different spacing is needed\n% This text is NOT compensated for in the dynamic sizer.\n\\let\\@IEEEaftertitletext=\\relax\n\\long\\def\\IEEEaftertitletext#1{\\def\\@IEEEaftertitletext{#1}}\n\n\n% V1.7 provide a way for users to enter abstract and keywords\n% into the onecolumn title are. This text is compensated for\n% in the dynamic sizer.\n\\let\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext=\\relax\n\\long\\def\\IEEEtitleabstractindextext#1{\\def\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext{#1}}\n\n% V1.7 provide a way for users to get the \\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext if\n% not in compsoc or transmag journal mode - this way abstract and keywords\n% can still be placed in their conventional position if not in those modes.\n\\def\\IEEEdisplaynontitleabstractindextext{%\n% display for all conference formats\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext\\relax\n\\else% non-conferences\n % V1.8a display for all technotes\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext\\relax\n % V1.8a add diamond line after abstract and index terms for compsoc technotes\n \\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\noindent\\hfill\\IEEEcompsocdiamondline\\hfill\\hbox{}\\par}\\relax\n \\else % non-conferences and non-technotes\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc% display if not compsoc and not transmag\n \\else\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\n \\else% not compsoc journal nor transmag journal\n \\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext\\relax\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi}\n\n\n% command to allow alteration of baselinestretch, but only if the current\n% baselineskip is unity. Used to tweak the compsoc abstract and keywords line spacing.\n\\def\\@IEEEtweakunitybaselinestretch#1{{\\def\\baselinestretch{1}\\selectfont\n\\global\\@tempskipa\\baselineskip}\\ifnum\\@tempskipa=\\baselineskip%\n\\def\\baselinestretch{#1}\\selectfont\\fi\\relax}\n\n\n% abstract and keywords are in \\small, except \n% for 9pt docs in which they are in \\footnotesize\n% Because 9pt docs use an 8pt footnotesize, \\small\n% becomes a rather awkward 8.5pt\n\\def\\@IEEEabskeysecsize{\\small}\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizenine\n \\def\\@IEEEabskeysecsize{\\footnotesize}\n\\fi\n\n% compsoc journals use \\footnotesize, compsoc conferences use normalsize\n\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\def\\@IEEEabskeysecsize{\\footnotesize}}\n\\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\def\\@IEEEabskeysecsize{\\small}}\n\n\n% V1.6 have abstract and keywords strip leading spaces, pars and newlines\n% so that spacing is more tightly controlled.\n\\def\\abstract{\\normalfont\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\bfseries\\textit{\\abstractname}---\\relax\n \\else\n \\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering\\vspace{-1.78ex}\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\textbf{\\abstractname}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup\\quotation\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\n \\fi\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}\n% V1.6 The IEEE wants only 1 pica from end of abstract to introduction heading when in \n% conference mode (the heading already has this much above it)\n\\def\\endabstract{\\relax\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\\vspace{0ex}\\else\\vspace{1.34ex}\\fi\\par\\if@twocolumn\\else\\endquotation\\fi\n \\normalfont\\normalsize}\n\n\\def\\IEEEkeywords{\\normalfont\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\bfseries\\textit{\\IEEEkeywordsname}---\\relax\n \\else\n \\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\textbf{\\IEEEkeywordsname}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup\\quotation\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\n \\fi\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}\n\\def\\endIEEEkeywords{\\relax\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote\\vspace{1.34ex}\\else\\vspace{0.67ex}\\fi\n \\par\\if@twocolumn\\else\\endquotation\\fi%\n \\normalfont\\normalsize}\n\n% V1.7 compsoc keywords index terms\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONconference% compsoc conference\n\\def\\abstract{\\normalfont\\@IEEEtweakunitybaselinestretch{1.15}\\bfseries\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\noindent\\textit{\\abstractname}---\\relax\n \\else\n \\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering\\vspace{-1.78ex}\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\textbf{\\abstractname}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup\\quotation\\@IEEEabskeysecsize%\n \\fi\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}\n\\def\\IEEEkeywords{\\normalfont\\@IEEEtweakunitybaselinestretch{1.15}\\bfseries\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\vskip 0.5\\baselineskip plus 0.25\\baselineskip minus 0.25\\baselineskip\\noindent\n \\textit{\\IEEEkeywordsname}---\\relax\n \\else\n \\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\textbf{\\IEEEkeywordsname}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup\\quotation\\@IEEEabskeysecsize%\n \\fi\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}\n \\else% compsoc not conference\n\\def\\abstract{\\normalfont\\@IEEEtweakunitybaselinestretch{1.15}\\sffamily\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\noindent\\textbf{\\abstractname}---\\relax\n \\else\n \\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering\\vspace{-1.78ex}\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\textbf{\\abstractname}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup\\quotation\\@IEEEabskeysecsize%\n \\fi\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}\n\\def\\IEEEkeywords{\\normalfont\\@IEEEtweakunitybaselinestretch{1.15}\\sffamily\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\vskip 0.5\\baselineskip plus 0.25\\baselineskip minus 0.25\\baselineskip\\noindent\n \\textbf{\\IEEEkeywordsname}---\\relax\n \\else\n \\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\textbf{\\IEEEkeywordsname}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup\\quotation\\@IEEEabskeysecsize%\n \\fi\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n% V1.8 transmag keywords index terms\n% no abstract name, use indentation\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\n\\def\\abstract{\\normalfont\\parindent 1em\\relax\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\bfseries\\indent\n \\else\n \\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering\\vspace{-1.78ex}\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\n \\textbf{\\abstractname}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup\\quotation\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\n \\fi\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}\n\n\\def\\IEEEkeywords{\\normalfont\\parindent 1em\\relax\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\vspace{1\\baselineskip}\\bfseries\\indent\\textit{\\IEEEkeywordsname}---\\relax\n \\else\n \\bgroup\\par\\vspace{1\\baselineskip}\\centering\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\n \\textbf{\\IEEEkeywordsname}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup\\quotation\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\n \\fi\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% gobbles all leading \\, \\\\ and \\par, upon finding first token that\n% is not a \\ , \\\\ or a \\par, it ceases and returns that token\n% \n% used to strip leading \\, \\\\ and \\par from the input\n% so that such things in the beginning of an environment will not\n% affect the formatting of the text\n\\long\\def\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP#1{\\let\\@IEEEswallowthistoken=0%\n\\let\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSPtoken#1%\n\\let\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARtoken=\\par%\n\\let\\@IEEEgobbleleadNLtoken=\\\\%\n\\let\\@IEEEgobbleleadSPtoken=\\ %\n\\def\\@IEEEgobbleleadSPMACRO{\\ }%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSPtoken\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARtoken%\n\\let\\@IEEEswallowthistoken=1%\n\\fi%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSPtoken\\@IEEEgobbleleadNLtoken%\n\\let\\@IEEEswallowthistoken=1%\n\\fi%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSPtoken\\@IEEEgobbleleadSPtoken%\n\\let\\@IEEEswallowthistoken=1%\n\\fi%\n% a control space will come in as a macro\n% when it is the last one on a line\n\\ifx\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSPtoken\\@IEEEgobbleleadSPMACRO%\n\\let\\@IEEEswallowthistoken=1%\n\\fi%\n% if we have to swallow this token, do so and taste the next one\n% else spit it out and stop gobbling\n\\ifx\\@IEEEswallowthistoken 1\\let\\@IEEEnextgobbleleadPARNLSP=\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP\\else%\n\\let\\@IEEEnextgobbleleadPARNLSP=#1\\fi%\n\\@IEEEnextgobbleleadPARNLSP}%\n\n\n\n\n% TITLING OF SECTIONS\n\\def\\@IEEEsectpunct{:\\ \\,} % Punctuation after run-in section heading (headings which are\n % part of the paragraphs), need little bit more than a single space\n % spacing from section number to title\n% compsoc conferences use regular period/space punctuation\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n\\def\\@IEEEsectpunct{.\\ }\n\\fi\\fi\n\n\n\\def\\@seccntformat#1{\\csname the#1dis\\endcsname\\hskip 0.5em\\relax}\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n% compsoc journals need extra spacing\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\\else\n\\def\\@seccntformat#1{\\csname the#1dis\\endcsname\\hskip 1em\\relax}\n\\fi\\fi\n\n%v1.7 put {} after #6 to allow for some types of user font control\n%and use \\@@par rather than \\par\n\\def\\@sect#1#2#3#4#5#6[#7]#8{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth\n \\let\\@svsec\\@empty\n \\else\n \\refstepcounter{#1}%\n % load section label and spacer into \\@svsec\n \\protected@edef\\@svsec{\\@seccntformat{#1}\\relax}%\n \\fi%\n \\@tempskipa #5\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@% tempskipa determines whether is treated as a high\n \\begingroup #6{\\relax% or low level heading\n \\noindent % subsections are NOT indented\n % print top level headings. \\@svsec is label, #8 is heading title\n % The IEEE does not block indent the section title text, it flows like normal\n {\\hskip #3\\relax\\@svsec}{\\interlinepenalty \\@M #8\\@@par}}%\n \\endgroup\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{\\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth\\relax\\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}\\fi#7}%\n \\else % printout low level headings\n % svsechd seems to swallow the trailing space, protect it with \\mbox{}\n % got rid of sectionmark stuff\n \\def\\@svsechd{#6{\\hskip #3\\relax\\@svsec #8\\@IEEEsectpunct\\mbox{}}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{\\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth\\relax\\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}\\fi#7}}%\n \\fi%skip down\n \\@xsect{#5}}\n\n\n% section* handler\n%v1.7 put {} after #4 to allow for some types of user font control\n%and use \\@@par rather than \\par\n\\def\\@ssect#1#2#3#4#5{\\@tempskipa #3\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n %\\begingroup #4\\@hangfrom{\\hskip #1}{\\interlinepenalty \\@M #5\\par}\\endgroup\n % The IEEE does not block indent the section title text, it flows like normal\n \\begingroup \\noindent #4{\\relax{\\hskip #1}{\\interlinepenalty \\@M #5\\@@par}}\\endgroup\n % svsechd swallows the trailing space, protect it with \\mbox{}\n \\else \\def\\@svsechd{#4{\\hskip #1\\relax #5\\@IEEEsectpunct\\mbox{}}}\\fi\n \\@xsect{#3}}\n\n\n%% SECTION heading spacing and font\n%%\n% arguments are: #1 - sectiontype name\n% (for \\@sect) #2 - section level\n% #3 - section heading indent\n% #4 - top separation (absolute value used, neg indicates not to indent main text)\n% If negative, make stretch parts negative too!\n% #5 - (absolute value used) positive: bottom separation after heading,\n% negative: amount to indent main text after heading\n% Both #4 and #5 negative means to indent main text and use negative top separation\n% #6 - font control\n% You've got to have \\normalfont\\normalsize in the font specs below to prevent\n% trouble when you do something like:\n% \\section{Note}{\\ttfamily TT-TEXT} is known to ... \n% The IEEE sometimes REALLY stretches the area before a section\n% heading by up to about 0.5in. However, it may not be a good\n% idea to let LaTeX have quite this much rubber.\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference%\n% The IEEE wants section heading spacing to decrease for conference mode\n\\def\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}{1.5ex plus 1.5ex minus 0.5ex}%\n{0.7ex plus 1ex minus 0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\centering\\scshape}}%\n\\def\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}{1.5ex plus 1.5ex minus 0.5ex}%\n{0.7ex plus .5ex minus 0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}%\n\\else % for journals\n\\def\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}{3.0ex plus 1.5ex minus 1.5ex}% V1.6 3.0ex from 3.5ex\n{0.7ex plus 1ex minus 0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\centering\\scshape}}%\n\\def\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}{3.5ex plus 1.5ex minus 1.5ex}%\n{0.7ex plus .5ex minus 0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}%\n\\fi\n\n% for both journals and conferences\n% decided to put in a little rubber above the section, might help somebody\n\\def\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\parindent}{0ex plus 0.1ex minus 0.1ex}%\n{0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}%\n\\def\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{2\\parindent}{0ex plus 0.1ex minus 0.1ex}%\n{0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}%\n\n\n% compsoc\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n% compsoc conference\n\\def\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}{1\\baselineskip plus 0.25\\baselineskip minus 0.25\\baselineskip}%\n{1\\baselineskip plus 0.25\\baselineskip minus 0.25\\baselineskip}{\\normalfont\\large\\bfseries}}%\n\\def\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}{1\\baselineskip plus 0.25\\baselineskip minus 0.25\\baselineskip}%\n{1\\baselineskip plus 0.25\\baselineskip minus 0.25\\baselineskip}{\\normalfont\\sublargesize\\bfseries}}%\n\\def\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}{1\\baselineskip plus 0.25\\baselineskip minus 0.25\\baselineskip}%\n{0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries}}%\n\\def\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{2\\parindent}{0ex plus 0.1ex minus 0.1ex}%\n{0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize}}%\n\\else% compsoc journals\n% use negative top separation as compsoc journals do not indent paragraphs after section titles\n\\def\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}{-3.5ex plus -2ex minus -1.5ex}%\n{0.7ex plus 1ex minus 0ex}{\\normalfont\\sublargesize\\sffamily\\bfseries\\scshape}}%\n% Note that subsection and smaller may not be correct for the Computer Society,\n% I have to look up an example.\n\\def\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}{-3.5ex plus -1.5ex minus -1.5ex}%\n{0.7ex plus .5ex minus 0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\sffamily\\bfseries}}%\n\\def\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}{-2.5ex plus -1ex minus -1ex}%\n{0.5ex plus 0.5ex minus 0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\sffamily\\itshape}}%\n\\def\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{2\\parindent}{-0ex plus -0.1ex minus -0.1ex}%\n{0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize}}%\n\\fi\\fi\n\n% transmag\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\n\\def\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{0.75\\parindent}{3.5ex plus 1.5ex minus 1.5ex}%\n{0.7ex plus .5ex minus 0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}%\n\\def\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{1.25\\parindent}{0.1ex plus 0.1ex minus 0.1ex}%\n{0.1ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}%\n\\fi\n\n\n% V1.8a provide for a raised line Introduction section for use with Computer\n% Society papers. We have to remove any spacing glue after the section\n% heading and then remove the blank line for the new paragraph after it.\n% LaTeX's section handler alters \\everypar and we need to propogate those\n% changes outside of the \\parbox lest there be spacing problems at the top\n% of the next section.\n\\def\\IEEEraisesectionheading#1{\\noindent\\raisebox{1.5\\baselineskip}[0pt][0pt]{\\parbox[b]{\\columnwidth}{#1\\unskip\\global\\everypar=\\everypar}}\\vspace{-1\\baselineskip}\\vspace{-\\parskip}\\par}\n\n\n\n%% ENVIRONMENTS\n% \"box\" symbols at end of proofs\n\\def\\IEEEQEDclosed{\\mbox{\\rule[0pt]{1.3ex}{1.3ex}}} % for a filled box\n% V1.6 some journals use an open box instead that will just fit around a closed one\n\\def\\IEEEQEDopen{{\\setlength{\\fboxsep}{0pt}\\setlength{\\fboxrule}{0.2pt}\\fbox{\\rule[0pt]{0pt}{1.3ex}\\rule[0pt]{1.3ex}{0pt}}}}\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\def\\IEEEQED{\\IEEEQEDopen} % default to open for compsoc\n\\else\n\\def\\IEEEQED{\\IEEEQEDclosed} % otherwise default to closed\n\\fi\n\n%V1.8 flag to indicate if QED symbol is to be shown\n\\newif\\if@IEEEQEDshow \\@IEEEQEDshowtrue\n\\def\\IEEEproofindentspace{2\\parindent}% V1.8 allow user to change indentation amount if desired\n% v1.7 name change to avoid namespace collision with amsthm. Also add support\n% for an optional argument.\n\\def\\IEEEproof{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEproof}{\\@IEEEproof[\\IEEEproofname]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEproof[#1]{\\@IEEEQEDshowtrue\\par\\noindent\\hspace{\\IEEEproofindentspace}{\\itshape #1: }}\n\\def\\endIEEEproof{\\if@IEEEQEDshow\\hspace*{\\fill}\\nobreakspace\\IEEEQED\\fi\\par}\n% qedhere for equation environments, similar to AMS \\qedhere\n\\def\\IEEEQEDhereeqn{\\global\\@IEEEQEDshowfalse\\eqno\\let\\eqno\\relax\\let\\leqno\\relax\n \\let\\veqno\\relax\\hbox{\\IEEEQED}}\n% IEEE style qedhere for IEEEeqnarray and other environments\n\\def\\IEEEQEDhere{\\global\\@IEEEQEDshowfalse\\IEEEQED}\n% command to disable QED at end of IEEEproof\n\\def\\IEEEQEDoff{\\global\\@IEEEQEDshowfalse}\n\n\n%\\itemindent is set to \\z@ by list, so define new temporary variable\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n% V1.8a compsoc uses bold theorem titles, a period instead of a colon, vertical spacing, and hanging indentation\n% V1.8 allow long theorem names to break across lines.\n% Thanks to Miquel Payaro for reporting this.\n\\def\\@begintheorem#1#2{\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\\itemindent\\relax\n \\topsep 0.2\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip plus 0.26\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip minus 0.05\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\n \\rmfamily\\trivlist\\hangindent\\parindent%\n \\item[]\\textit{\\bfseries\\noindent #1\\ #2.} \\itemindent\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\\relax}\n\\def\\@opargbegintheorem#1#2#3{\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\\itemindent\\relax\n\\topsep 0.2\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip plus 0.26\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip minus 0.05\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\n\\rmfamily\\trivlist\\hangindent\\parindent%\n% V1.6 The IEEE is back to using () around theorem names which are also in italics\n% Thanks to Christian Peel for reporting this.\n \\item[]\\textit{\\bfseries\\noindent #1\\ #2\\ (#3).} \\itemindent\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\\relax}\n% V1.7 remove bogus \\unskip that caused equations in theorems to collide with\n% lines below.\n\\def\\@endtheorem{\\endtrivlist\\vskip 0.25\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip plus 0.26\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip minus 0.05\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}\n\\else\n%\n% noncompsoc\n% \n% V1.8 allow long theorem names to break across lines.\n% Thanks to Miquel Payaro for reporting this.\n\\def\\@begintheorem#1#2{\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\\itemindent\\relax\\topsep 0pt\\rmfamily\\trivlist%\n \\item[]\\textit{\\indent #1\\ #2:} \\itemindent\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\\relax}\n\\def\\@opargbegintheorem#1#2#3{\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\\itemindent\\relax\\topsep 0pt\\rmfamily \\trivlist%\n% V1.6 The IEEE is back to using () around theorem names which are also in italics\n% Thanks to Christian Peel for reporting this.\n \\item[]\\textit{\\indent #1\\ #2\\ (#3):} \\itemindent\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\\relax}\n% V1.7 remove bogus \\unskip that caused equations in theorems to collide with\n% lines below.\n\\def\\@endtheorem{\\endtrivlist}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% V1.6\n% display command for the section the theorem is in - so that \\thesection\n% is not used as this will be in Roman numerals when we want arabic.\n% LaTeX2e uses \\def\\@thmcounter#1{\\noexpand\\arabic{#1}} for the theorem number\n% (second part) display and \\def\\@thmcountersep{.} as a separator.\n% V1.7 intercept calls to the section counter and reroute to \\@IEEEthmcounterinsection\n% to allow \\appendix(ices} to override as needed.\n%\n% special handler for sections, allows appendix(ices) to override\n\\gdef\\@IEEEthmcounterinsection#1{\\arabic{#1}}\n% string macro\n\\edef\\@IEEEstringsection{section}\n\n% redefine the #1#2[#3] form of newtheorem to use a hook to \\@IEEEthmcounterinsection\n% if section in_counter is used\n\\def\\@xnthm#1#2[#3]{%\n \\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\@definecounter{#1}\\@newctr{#1}[#3]%\n \\edef\\@IEEEstringtmp{#3}\n \\ifx\\@IEEEstringtmp\\@IEEEstringsection\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname the#1\\endcsname{%\n \\noexpand\\@IEEEthmcounterinsection{#3}\\@thmcountersep\n \\@thmcounter{#1}}%\n \\else\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname the#1\\endcsname{%\n \\expandafter\\noexpand\\csname the#3\\endcsname \\@thmcountersep\n \\@thmcounter{#1}}%\n \\fi\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@thm{#1}{#2}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}\n\n\n\n%% SET UP THE DEFAULT PAGESTYLE\n\\pagestyle{headings}\n\\pagenumbering{arabic}\n\n% normally the page counter starts at 1\n\\setcounter{page}{1}\n% however, for peerreview the cover sheet is page 0 or page -1\n% (for duplex printing)\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview\n \\if@twoside\n \\setcounter{page}{-1}\n \\else\n \\setcounter{page}{0}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n% standard book class behavior - let bottom line float up and down as\n% needed when single sided\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtwoside\\else\\raggedbottom\\fi\n% if two column - turn on twocolumn, allow word spacings to stretch more and\n% enforce a rigid position for the last lines\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtwocolumn\n% the peer review option delays invoking twocolumn\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview\\else\n \\twocolumn\n \\fi\n\\sloppy \n\\flushbottom\n\\fi\n\n\n\n\n% \\APPENDIX and \\APPENDICES definitions\n\n% This is the \\@ifmtarg command from the LaTeX ifmtarg package\n% by Peter Wilson (CUA) and Donald Arseneau\n% \\@ifmtarg is used to determine if an argument to a command\n% is present or not.\n% For instance:\n% \\@ifmtarg{#1}{\\typeout{empty}}{\\typeout{has something}}\n% \\@ifmtarg is used with our redefined \\section command if\n% \\appendices is invoked.\n% The command \\section will behave slightly differently depending\n% on whether the user specifies a title: \n% \\section{My appendix title}\n% or not:\n% \\section{}\n% This way, we can eliminate the blank lines where the title\n% would be, and the unneeded : after Appendix in the table of\n% contents \n\\begingroup\n\\catcode`\\Q=3\n\\long\\gdef\\@ifmtarg#1{\\@xifmtarg#1QQ\\@secondoftwo\\@firstoftwo\\@nil}\n\\long\\gdef\\@xifmtarg#1#2Q#3#4#5\\@nil{#4}\n\\endgroup\n% end of \\@ifmtarg defs\n\n\n% V1.7\n% command that allows the one time saving of the original definition\n% of section to \\@IEEEappendixsavesection for \\appendix or \\appendices \n% we don't save \\section here as it may be redefined later by other\n% packages (hyperref.sty, etc.)\n\\def\\@IEEEsaveoriginalsectiononce{\\let\\@IEEEappendixsavesection\\section\n\\let\\@IEEEsaveoriginalsectiononce\\relax}\n\n% neat trick to grab and process the argument from \\section{argument}\n% we process differently if the user invoked \\section{} with no\n% argument (title)\n% note we reroute the call to the old \\section*\n\\def\\@IEEEprocessthesectionargument#1{%\n\\@ifmtarg{#1}{%\n\\@IEEEappendixsavesection*{\\appendixname\\nobreakspace\\thesectiondis}%\n\\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\\appendixname\\nobreakspace\\thesection}}{%\n\\@IEEEappendixsavesection*{\\appendixname\\nobreakspace\\thesectiondis\\\\* #1}%\n\\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\\appendixname\\nobreakspace\\thesection: #1}}}\n\n% we use this if the user calls \\section{} after\n% \\appendix-- which has no meaning. So, we ignore the\n% command and its argument. Then, warn the user.\n\\def\\@IEEEdestroythesectionargument#1{\\typeout{** WARNING: Ignoring useless\n\\protect\\section\\space in Appendix (line \\the\\inputlineno).}}\n\n\n% remember \\thesection forms will be displayed in \\ref calls\n% and in the Table of Contents.\n% The \\sectiondis form is used in the actual heading itself\n\n% appendix command for one single appendix\n% normally has no heading. However, if you want a \n% heading, you can do so via the optional argument:\n% \\appendix[Optional Heading]\n\\def\\appendix{\\relax}\n\\renewcommand{\\appendix}[1][]{\\@IEEEsaveoriginalsectiononce\\par\n % v1.6 keep hyperref's identifiers unique\n \\gdef\\theHsection{Appendix.A}%\n % v1.6 adjust hyperref's string name for the section\n \\xdef\\Hy@chapapp{appendix}%\n \\setcounter{section}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsubsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{paragraph}{0}%\n \\gdef\\thesection{A}%\n \\gdef\\thesectiondis{}% \n \\gdef\\thesubsection{\\Alph{subsection}}%\n \\gdef\\@IEEEthmcounterinsection##1{A}\n \\refstepcounter{section}% update the \\ref counter\n \\@ifmtarg{#1}{\\@IEEEappendixsavesection*{\\appendixname}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\\appendixname}}{%\n \\@IEEEappendixsavesection*{\\appendixname\\nobreakspace\\\\* #1}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\\appendixname: #1}}%\n % redefine \\section command for appendix\n % leave \\section* as is\n \\def\\section{\\@ifstar{\\@IEEEappendixsavesection*}{%\n \\@IEEEdestroythesectionargument}}% throw out the argument\n % of the normal form\n}\n\n\n\n% appendices command for multiple appendices\n% user then calls \\section with an argument (possibly empty) to\n% declare the individual appendices\n\\def\\appendices{\\@IEEEsaveoriginalsectiononce\\par\n % v1.6 keep hyperref's identifiers unique\n \\gdef\\theHsection{Appendix.\\Alph{section}}%\n % v1.6 adjust hyperref's string name for the section\n \\xdef\\Hy@chapapp{appendix}%\n \\setcounter{section}{-1}% we want \\refstepcounter to use section 0\n \\setcounter{subsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsubsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{paragraph}{0}%\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONromanappendices%\n \\gdef\\thesection{\\Roman{section}}%\n \\gdef\\thesectiondis{\\Roman{section}}%\n \\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\gdef\\thesectiondis{\\Roman{section}.}}%\n \\gdef\\@IEEEthmcounterinsection##1{A\\arabic{##1}}\n \\else%\n \\gdef\\thesection{\\Alph{section}}%\n \\gdef\\thesectiondis{\\Alph{section}}%\n \\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\gdef\\thesectiondis{\\Alph{section}.}}%\n \\gdef\\@IEEEthmcounterinsection##1{\\Alph{##1}}\n \\fi%\n \\refstepcounter{section}% update the \\ref counter\n \\setcounter{section}{0}% NEXT \\section will be the FIRST appendix\n % redefine \\section command for appendices\n % leave \\section* as is\n \\def\\section{\\@ifstar{\\@IEEEappendixsavesection*}{% process the *-form\n \\refstepcounter{section}% or is a new section so,\n \\@IEEEprocessthesectionargument}}% process the argument \n % of the normal form\n}\n\n\n\n% V1.7 compoc uses nonbold drop cap and small caps word style\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\def\\IEEEPARstartFONTSTYLE{\\mdseries}\n \\def\\IEEEPARstartWORDFONTSTYLE{\\scshape}\n \\def\\IEEEPARstartWORDCAPSTYLE{\\relax}\n\\fi\n%\n%\n% \\IEEEPARstart\n% Definition for the big two line drop cap letter at the beginning of the\n% first paragraph of journal papers. The first argument is the first letter\n% of the first word, the second argument is the remaining letters of the\n% first word which will be rendered in upper case.\n% In V1.6 this has been completely rewritten to:\n% \n% 1. no longer have problems when the user begins an environment\n% within the paragraph that uses \\IEEEPARstart.\n% 2. auto-detect and use the current font family\n% 3. revise handling of the space at the end of the first word so that\n% interword glue will now work as normal.\n% 4. produce correctly aligned edges for the (two) indented lines.\n% \n% We generalize things via control macros - playing with these is fun too.\n% \n% V1.7 added more control macros to make it easy for IEEEtrantools.sty users\n% to change the font style.\n% \n% the number of lines that are indented to clear it\n% may need to increase if using decenders\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartDROPLINES}{2}\n% minimum number of lines left on a page to allow a \\@IEEEPARstart\n% Does not take into consideration rubber shrink, so it tends to\n% be overly cautious\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartMINPAGELINES}{2}\n% V1.7 the height of the drop cap is adjusted to match the height of this text\n% in the current font (when \\IEEEPARstart is called).\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartHEIGHTTEXT}{T}\n% the depth the letter is lowered below the baseline\n% the height (and size) of the letter is determined by the sum\n% of this value and the height of the \\IEEEPARstartHEIGHTTEXT in the current\n% font. It is a good idea to set this value in terms of the baselineskip\n% so that it can respond to changes therein.\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartDROPDEPTH}{1.1\\baselineskip}\n% V1.7 the font the drop cap will be rendered in,\n% can take zero or one argument.\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartFONTSTYLE}{\\bfseries}\n% V1.7 any additional, non-font related commands needed to modify\n% the drop cap letter, can take zero or one argument.\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartCAPSTYLE}{\\MakeUppercase}\n% V1.7 the font that will be used to render the rest of the word,\n% can take zero or one argument.\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartWORDFONTSTYLE}{\\relax}\n% V1.7 any additional, non-font related commands needed to modify\n% the rest of the word, can take zero or one argument.\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartWORDCAPSTYLE}{\\MakeUppercase}\n% This is the horizontal separation distance from the drop letter to the main text.\n% Lengths that depend on the font (e.g., ex, em, etc.) will be referenced\n% to the font that is active when \\IEEEPARstart is called. \n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartSEP}{0.15em}\n% V1.7 horizontal offset applied to the left of the drop cap.\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartHOFFSET}{0em}\n% V1.7 Italic correction command applied at the end of the drop cap.\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartITLCORRECT}{\\/}\n\n% width of the letter output, set globally. Can be used in \\IEEEPARstartSEP\n% or \\IEEEPARstartHOFFSET, but not the height lengths.\n\\newdimen\\IEEEPARstartletwidth\n\\IEEEPARstartletwidth 0pt\\relax\n\n% definition of \\IEEEPARstart\n% THIS IS A CONTROLLED SPACING AREA, DO NOT ALLOW SPACES WITHIN THESE LINES\n% \n% The token \\@IEEEPARstartfont will be globally defined after the first use\n% of \\IEEEPARstart and will be a font command which creates the big letter\n% The first argument is the first letter of the first word and the second\n% argument is the rest of the first word(s).\n\\def\\IEEEPARstart#1#2{\\par{%\n% if this page does not have enough space, break it and lets start\n% on a new one\n\\@IEEEtranneedspace{\\IEEEPARstartMINPAGELINES\\baselineskip}{\\relax}%\n% V1.7 move this up here in case user uses \\textbf for \\IEEEPARstartFONTSTYLE\n% which uses command \\leavevmode which causes an unwanted \\indent to be issued\n\\noindent\n% calculate the desired height of the big letter\n% it extends from the top of \\IEEEPARstartHEIGHTTEXT in the current font\n% down to \\IEEEPARstartDROPDEPTH below the current baseline\n\\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\IEEEPARstartHEIGHTTEXT}%\n\\addtolength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\IEEEPARstartDROPDEPTH}%\n% extract the name of the current font in bold\n% and place it in \\@IEEEPARstartFONTNAME\n\\def\\@IEEEPARstartGETFIRSTWORD##1 ##2\\relax{##1}%\n{\\IEEEPARstartFONTSTYLE{\\selectfont\\edef\\@IEEEPARstartFONTNAMESPACE{\\fontname\\font\\space}%\n\\xdef\\@IEEEPARstartFONTNAME{\\expandafter\\@IEEEPARstartGETFIRSTWORD\\@IEEEPARstartFONTNAMESPACE\\relax}}}%\n% define a font based on this name with a point size equal to the desired\n% height of the drop letter\n\\font\\@IEEEPARstartsubfont\\@IEEEPARstartFONTNAME\\space at \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax%\n% save this value as a counter (integer) value (sp points)\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA=\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA%\n% now get the height of the actual letter produced by this font size\n\\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}{\\@IEEEPARstartsubfont\\IEEEPARstartCAPSTYLE{#1}}%\n% If something bogus happens like the first argument is empty or the\n% current font is strange, do not allow a zero height.\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB=0pt\\relax%\n\\typeout{** WARNING: IEEEPARstart drop letter has zero height! (line \\the\\inputlineno)}%\n\\typeout{ Forcing the drop letter font size to 10pt.}%\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB=10pt%\n\\fi%\n% and store it as a counter\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB=\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB%\n% Since a font size doesn't exactly correspond to the height of the capital\n% letters in that font, the actual height of the letter, \\@IEEEtrantmpcountB,\n% will be less than that desired, \\@IEEEtrantmpcountA\n% we need to raise the font size, \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA \n% by \\@IEEEtrantmpcountA / \\@IEEEtrantmpcountB\n% But, TeX doesn't have floating point division, so we have to use integer\n% division. Hence the use of the counters.\n% We need to reduce the denominator so that the loss of the remainder will\n% have minimal affect on the accuracy of the result\n\\divide\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB by 200%\n\\divide\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA by \\@IEEEtrantmpcountB%\n% Then reequalize things when we use TeX's ability to multiply by\n% floating point values\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB=0.005\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA%\n\\multiply\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by \\@IEEEtrantmpcountA%\n% \\@IEEEPARstartfont is globaly set to the calculated font of the big letter\n% We need to carry this out of the local calculation area to to create the\n% big letter.\n\\global\\font\\@IEEEPARstartfont\\@IEEEPARstartFONTNAME\\space at \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB%\n% Now set \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA to the width of the big letter\n% We need to carry this out of the local calculation area to set the\n% hanging indent\n\\settowidth{\\global\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\@IEEEPARstartfont\n\\IEEEPARstartCAPSTYLE{#1\\IEEEPARstartITLCORRECT}}}%\n% end of the isolated calculation environment\n\\global\\IEEEPARstartletwidth\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax%\n% add in the extra clearance we want\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by \\IEEEPARstartSEP\\relax%\n% add in the optional offset\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by \\IEEEPARstartHOFFSET\\relax%\n% V1.7 don't allow negative offsets to produce negative hanging indents\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n\\ifnum\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB < 0 \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB 0pt\\fi\n% \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA has the width of the big letter plus the\n% separation space and \\@IEEEPARstartfont is the font we need to use\n% Now, we make the letter and issue the hanging indent command\n% The letter is placed in a box of zero width and height so that other\n% text won't be displaced by it.\n\\hangindent\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\hangafter=-\\IEEEPARstartDROPLINES%\n\\makebox[0pt][l]{\\hspace{-\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}%\n\\raisebox{-\\IEEEPARstartDROPDEPTH}[0pt][0pt]{\\hspace{\\IEEEPARstartHOFFSET}%\n\\@IEEEPARstartfont\\IEEEPARstartCAPSTYLE{#1\\IEEEPARstartITLCORRECT}%\n\\hspace{\\IEEEPARstartSEP}}}%\n{\\IEEEPARstartWORDFONTSTYLE{\\IEEEPARstartWORDCAPSTYLE{\\selectfont#2}}}}\n\n\n\n\n% determines if the space remaining on a given page is equal to or greater\n% than the specified space of argument one\n% if not, execute argument two (only if the remaining space is greater than zero)\n% and issue a \\newpage\n% \n% example: \\@IEEEtranneedspace{2in}{\\vfill}\n% \n% Does not take into consideration rubber shrinkage, so it tends to\n% be overly cautious\n% Based on an example posted by Donald Arseneau\n% Note this macro uses \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB internally for calculations,\n% so DO NOT PASS \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB to this routine\n% if you need a dimen register, import with \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA instead\n\\def\\@IEEEtranneedspace#1#2{\\penalty-100\\begingroup%shield temp variable\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\pagegoal\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB-\\pagetotal% space left\n\\ifdim #1>\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax% not enough space left\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB>\\z@\\relax #2\\fi%\n\\newpage%\n\\fi\\endgroup}\n\n\n\n% IEEEbiography ENVIRONMENT\n% Allows user to enter biography leaving place for picture (adapts to font size)\n% As of V1.5, a new optional argument allows you to have a real graphic!\n% V1.5 and later also fixes the \"colliding biographies\" which could happen when a \n% biography's text was shorter than the space for the photo.\n% MDS 7/2001\n% V1.6 prevent multiple biographies from making multiple TOC entries\n\\newif\\if@IEEEbiographyTOCentrynotmade\n\\global\\@IEEEbiographyTOCentrynotmadetrue\n\n% biography counter so hyperref can jump directly to the biographies\n% and not just the previous section\n\\newcounter{IEEEbiography}\n\\setcounter{IEEEbiography}{0}\n\n% photo area size\n\\def\\@IEEEBIOphotowidth{1.0in} % width of the biography photo area\n\\def\\@IEEEBIOphotodepth{1.25in} % depth (height) of the biography photo area\n% area cleared for photo\n\\def\\@IEEEBIOhangwidth{1.14in} % width cleared for the biography photo area\n\\def\\@IEEEBIOhangdepth{1.25in} % depth cleared for the biography photo area\n % actual depth will be a multiple of \n % \\baselineskip, rounded up\n\\def\\@IEEEBIOskipN{4\\baselineskip}% nominal value of the vskip above the biography\n\n\\newenvironment{IEEEbiography}[2][]{\\normalfont\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\sffamily}\\footnotesize%\n\\unitlength 1in\\parskip=0pt\\par\\parindent 1em\\interlinepenalty500%\n% we need enough space to support the hanging indent\n% the nominal value of the spacer\n% and one extra line for good measure\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=\\@IEEEBIOhangdepth%\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by \\@IEEEBIOskipN%\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by 1\\baselineskip%\n% if this page does not have enough space, break it and lets start\n% with a new one\n\\@IEEEtranneedspace{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\relax}%\n% nominal spacer can strech, not shrink use 1fil so user can out stretch with \\vfill\n\\vskip \\@IEEEBIOskipN plus 1fil minus 0\\baselineskip%\n% the default box for where the photo goes\n\\def\\@IEEEtempbiographybox{{\\setlength{\\fboxsep}{0pt}\\framebox{%\n\\begin{minipage}[b][\\@IEEEBIOphotodepth][c]{\\@IEEEBIOphotowidth}\\centering PLACE\\\\ PHOTO\\\\ HERE \\end{minipage}}}}%\n%\n% detect if the optional argument was supplied, this requires the\n% \\@ifmtarg command as defined in the appendix section above\n% and if so, override the default box with what they want\n\\@ifmtarg{#1}{\\relax}{\\def\\@IEEEtempbiographybox{\\mbox{\\begin{minipage}[b][\\@IEEEBIOphotodepth][c]{\\@IEEEBIOphotowidth}%\n\\centering%\n#1%\n\\end{minipage}}}}% end if optional argument supplied\n% Make an entry into the table of contents only if we have not done so before\n\\if@IEEEbiographyTOCentrynotmade%\n% link labels to the biography counter so hyperref will jump\n% to the biography, not the previous section\n\\setcounter{IEEEbiography}{-1}%\n\\refstepcounter{IEEEbiography}%\n\\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Biographies}%\n\\global\\@IEEEbiographyTOCentrynotmadefalse%\n\\fi%\n% one more biography\n\\refstepcounter{IEEEbiography}%\n% Make an entry for this name into the table of contents \n\\addcontentsline{toc}{subsection}{#2}%\n% V1.6 properly handle if a new paragraph should occur while the\n% hanging indent is still active. Do this by redefining \\par so\n% that it will not start a new paragraph. (But it will appear to the\n% user as if it did.) Also, strip any leading pars, newlines, or spaces.\n\\let\\@IEEEBIOORGparCMD=\\par% save the original \\par command\n\\edef\\par{\\hfil\\break\\indent}% the new \\par will not be a \"real\" \\par\n\\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\@IEEEtempbiographybox}% get height of biography box\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB=\\@IEEEBIOhangdepth%\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA=\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB% countA has the hang depth\n\\divide\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA by \\baselineskip% calculates lines needed to produce the hang depth\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA by 1% ensure we overestimate\n% set the hanging indent\n\\hangindent\\@IEEEBIOhangwidth%\n\\hangafter-\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA%\n% reference the top of the photo area to the top of a capital T\n\\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}{\\mbox{T}}%\n% set the photo box, give it zero width and height so as not to disturb anything\n\\noindent\\makebox[0pt][l]{\\hspace{-\\@IEEEBIOhangwidth}\\raisebox{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}[0pt][0pt]{%\n\\raisebox{-\\@IEEEBIOphotodepth}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEtempbiographybox}}}%\n% now place the author name and begin the bio text\n\\noindent\\textbf{#2\\ }\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}{\\relax\\let\\par=\\@IEEEBIOORGparCMD\\par%\n% 7/2001 V1.5 detect when the biography text is shorter than the photo area\n% and pad the unused area - preventing a collision from the next biography entry\n% MDS\n\\ifnum \\prevgraf <\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA\\relax% detect when the biography text is shorter than the photo\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA by -\\prevgraf% calculate how many lines we need to pad\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA by -1\\relax% we compensate for the fact that we indented an extra line\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=\\baselineskip% calculate the length of the padding\n \\multiply\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by \\@IEEEtrantmpcountA%\n \\noindent\\rule{0pt}{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}% insert an invisible support strut\n\\fi%\n\\par\\normalfont}\n\n\n\n% V1.6\n% added biography without a photo environment\n\\newenvironment{IEEEbiographynophoto}[1]{%\n% Make an entry into the table of contents only if we have not done so before\n\\if@IEEEbiographyTOCentrynotmade%\n% link labels to the biography counter so hyperref will jump\n% to the biography, not the previous section\n\\setcounter{IEEEbiography}{-1}%\n\\refstepcounter{IEEEbiography}%\n\\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Biographies}%\n\\global\\@IEEEbiographyTOCentrynotmadefalse%\n\\fi%\n% one more biography\n\\refstepcounter{IEEEbiography}%\n% Make an entry for this name into the table of contents \n\\addcontentsline{toc}{subsection}{#1}%\n\\normalfont\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\sffamily}\\footnotesize\\interlinepenalty500%\n\\vskip 4\\baselineskip plus 1fil minus 0\\baselineskip%\n\\parskip=0pt\\par%\n\\noindent\\textbf{#1\\ }\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}{\\relax\\par\\normalfont}\n\n\n% provide the user with some old font commands\n% got this from article.cls\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\rm}{\\normalfont\\rmfamily}{\\mathrm}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\sf}{\\normalfont\\sffamily}{\\mathsf}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\tt}{\\normalfont\\ttfamily}{\\mathtt}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\bf}{\\normalfont\\bfseries}{\\mathbf}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\it}{\\normalfont\\itshape}{\\mathit}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\sl}{\\normalfont\\slshape}{\\@nomath\\sl}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\sc}{\\normalfont\\scshape}{\\@nomath\\sc}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand*\\cal{\\@fontswitch\\relax\\mathcal}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand*\\mit{\\@fontswitch\\relax\\mathnormal}\n\n\n% SPECIAL PAPER NOTICE COMMANDS\n% \n% holds the special notice text\n\\def\\@IEEEspecialpapernotice{\\relax}\n \n% for special papers, like invited papers, the user can do:\n% \\IEEEspecialpapernotice{(Invited Paper)} before \\maketitle\n\\def\\IEEEspecialpapernotice#1{\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference%\n\\def\\@IEEEspecialpapernotice{{\\sublargesize\\textit{#1}\\vspace*{1em}}}%\n\\else%\n\\def\\@IEEEspecialpapernotice{{\\\\*[1.5ex]\\sublargesize\\textit{#1}}\\vspace*{-2ex}}%\n\\fi}\n\n\n\n\n% PUBLISHER ID COMMANDS\n% to insert a publisher's ID footer\n% V1.6 \\IEEEpubid has been changed so that the change in page size and style\n% occurs in \\maketitle. \\IEEEpubid must now be issued prior to \\maketitle\n% use \\IEEEpubidadjcol as before - in the second column of the title page\n% These changes allow \\maketitle to take the reduced page height into\n% consideration when dynamically setting the space between the author \n% names and the maintext.\n%\n% the amount the main text is pulled up to make room for the\n% publisher's ID footer\n% The IEEE uses about 1.3\\baselineskip for journals, \n% dynamic title spacing will clean up the fraction\n\\def\\@IEEEpubidpullup{1.3\\baselineskip}\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote\n% for technotes it must be an integer of baselineskip as there can be no\n% dynamic title spacing for two column mode technotes (the title is in the\n% in first column) and we should maintain an integer number of lines in the\n% second column\n% There are some examples (such as older issues of \"Transactions on\n% Information Theory\") in which the IEEE really pulls the text off the ID for\n% technotes - about 0.55in (or 4\\baselineskip). We'll use 2\\baselineskip\n% and call it even.\n\\def\\@IEEEpubidpullup{2\\baselineskip}\n\\fi\n\n% V1.7 compsoc does not use a pullup\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\def\\@IEEEpubidpullup{0pt}\n\\fi\n\n% holds the ID text\n\\def\\@IEEEpubid{\\relax}\n\n% flag so \\maketitle can tell if \\IEEEpubid was called\n\\newif\\if@IEEEusingpubid\n\\global\\@IEEEusingpubidfalse\n% issue this command in the page to have the ID at the bottom\n% V1.6 use before \\maketitle\n\\def\\IEEEpubid#1{\\def\\@IEEEpubid{#1}\\global\\@IEEEusingpubidtrue}\n\n\n% command which will pull up (shorten) the column it is executed in\n% to make room for the publisher ID. Place in the second column of\n% the title page when using \\IEEEpubid\n% Is smart enough not to do anything when in single column text or\n% if the user hasn't called \\IEEEpubid\n% currently needed in for the second column of a page with the\n% publisher ID. If not needed in future releases, please provide this\n% command and define it as \\relax for backward compatibility\n% v1.6b do not allow command to operate if the peer review option has been \n% selected because \\IEEEpubidadjcol will not be on the cover page.\n% V1.7 do nothing if compsoc\n\\def\\IEEEpubidadjcol{\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\\else\\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview\\else\n\\if@twocolumn\\if@IEEEusingpubid\\enlargethispage{-\\@IEEEpubidpullup}\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi}\n\n% Special thanks to Peter Wilson, Daniel Luecking, and the other\n% gurus at comp.text.tex, for helping me to understand how best to\n% implement the IEEEpubid command in LaTeX.\n\n\n\n%% Lockout some commands under various conditions\n\n% general purpose bit bucket\n\\newsavebox{\\@IEEEtranrubishbin}\n\n% flags to prevent multiple warning messages\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNthanks\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEPARstart\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEbiography\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEbiographynophoto\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEpubid\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEpubidadjcol\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEmembership\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEaftertitletext\n\\@IEEEWARNthankstrue\n\\@IEEEWARNIEEEPARstarttrue\n\\@IEEEWARNIEEEbiographytrue\n\\@IEEEWARNIEEEbiographynophototrue\n\\@IEEEWARNIEEEpubidtrue\n\\@IEEEWARNIEEEpubidadjcoltrue\n\\@IEEEWARNIEEEmembershiptrue\n\\@IEEEWARNIEEEaftertitletexttrue\n\n\n%% Lockout some commands when in various modes, but allow them to be restored if needed\n%%\n% save commands which might be locked out\n% so that the user can later restore them if needed\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDthanks\\thanks\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEPARstart\\IEEEPARstart\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEbiography\\IEEEbiography\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDendIEEEbiography\\endIEEEbiography\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEbiographynophoto\\IEEEbiographynophoto\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDendIEEEbiographynophoto\\endIEEEbiographynophoto\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEpubid\\IEEEpubid\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEpubidadjcol\\IEEEpubidadjcol\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEmembership\\IEEEmembership\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEaftertitletext\\IEEEaftertitletext\n\n\n% disable \\IEEEPARstart when in draft mode\n% This may have originally been done because the pre-V1.6 drop letter\n% algorithm had problems with a non-unity baselinestretch\n% At any rate, it seems too formal to have a drop letter in a draft\n% paper.\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls\n\\def\\IEEEPARstart#1#2{#1#2\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEPARstart\\typeout{** ATTENTION: \\noexpand\\IEEEPARstart\n is disabled in draft mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEPARstartfalse}\n\\fi\n% and for technotes\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote\n\\def\\IEEEPARstart#1#2{#1#2\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEPARstart\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\IEEEPARstart\n is locked out for technotes (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEPARstartfalse}\n\\fi\n\n\n% lockout unneeded commands when in conference mode\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n% when locked out, \\thanks, \\IEEEbiography, \\IEEEbiographynophoto, \\IEEEpubid,\n% \\IEEEmembership and \\IEEEaftertitletext will all swallow their given text. \n% \\IEEEPARstart will output a normal character instead\n% warn the user about these commands only once to prevent the console screen\n% from filling up with redundant messages\n\\def\\thanks#1{\\if@IEEEWARNthanks\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\thanks\n is locked out when in conference mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNthanksfalse}\n\\def\\IEEEPARstart#1#2{#1#2\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEPARstart\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\IEEEPARstart\n is locked out when in conference mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEPARstartfalse}\n\n\n% LaTeX treats environments and commands with optional arguments differently.\n% the actual (\"internal\") command is stored as \\\\commandname \n% (accessed via \\csname\\string\\commandname\\endcsname )\n% the \"external\" command \\commandname is a macro with code to determine\n% whether or not the optional argument is presented and to provide the \n% default if it is absent. So, in order to save and restore such a command\n% we would have to save and restore \\\\commandname as well. But, if LaTeX\n% ever changes the way it names the internal names, the trick would break.\n% Instead let us just define a new environment so that the internal\n% name can be left undisturbed.\n\\newenvironment{@IEEEbogusbiography}[2][]{\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEbiography\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\IEEEbiography\n is locked out when in conference mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEbiographyfalse%\n\\setbox\\@IEEEtranrubishbin\\vbox\\bgroup}{\\egroup\\relax}\n% and make biography point to our bogus biography\n\\let\\IEEEbiography=\\@IEEEbogusbiography\n\\let\\endIEEEbiography=\\end@IEEEbogusbiography\n\n\\renewenvironment{IEEEbiographynophoto}[1]{\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEbiographynophoto\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\IEEEbiographynophoto\n is locked out when in conference mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEbiographynophotofalse%\n\\setbox\\@IEEEtranrubishbin\\vbox\\bgroup}{\\egroup\\relax}\n\n\\def\\IEEEpubid#1{\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEpubid\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\IEEEpubid \n is locked out when in conference mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEpubidfalse}\n\\def\\IEEEpubidadjcol{\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEpubidadjcol\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\IEEEpubidadjcol\n is locked out when in conference mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEpubidadjcolfalse}\n\\def\\IEEEmembership#1{\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEmembership\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\IEEEmembership\n is locked out when in conference mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEmembershipfalse}\n\\def\\IEEEaftertitletext#1{\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEaftertitletext\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\IEEEaftertitletext\n is locked out when in conference mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEaftertitletextfalse}\n\\fi\n\n\n% provide a way to restore the commands that are locked out\n\\def\\IEEEoverridecommandlockouts{%\n\\typeout{** ATTENTION: Overriding command lockouts (line \\the\\inputlineno).}%\n\\let\\thanks\\@IEEESAVECMDthanks%\n\\let\\IEEEPARstart\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEPARstart%\n\\let\\IEEEbiography\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEbiography%\n\\let\\endIEEEbiography\\@IEEESAVECMDendIEEEbiography%\n\\let\\IEEEbiographynophoto\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEbiographynophoto%\n\\let\\endIEEEbiographynophoto\\@IEEESAVECMDendIEEEbiographynophoto%\n\\let\\IEEEpubid\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEpubid%\n\\let\\IEEEpubidadjcol\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEpubidadjcol%\n\\let\\IEEEmembership\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEmembership%\n\\let\\IEEEaftertitletext\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEaftertitletext}\n\n\n\n% need a backslash character for typeout output\n{\\catcode`\\|=0 \\catcode`\\\\=12\n|xdef|@IEEEbackslash{\\}}\n\n\n% hook to allow easy disabling of all legacy warnings\n\\def\\@IEEElegacywarn#1#2{\\typeout{** ATTENTION: \\@IEEEbackslash #1 is deprecated (line \\the\\inputlineno).\nUse \\@IEEEbackslash #2 instead.}}\n\n\n% provide some legacy IEEEtran commands\n\\def\\IEEEcompsoctitleabstractindextext{\\@IEEElegacywarn{IEEEcompsoctitleabstractindextext}{IEEEtitleabstractindextext}\\IEEEtitleabstractindextext}\n\\def\\IEEEdisplaynotcompsoctitleabstractindextext{\\@IEEElegacywarn{IEEEdisplaynotcompsoctitleabstractindextext}{IEEEdisplaynontitleabstractindextext}\\IEEEdisplaynontitleabstractindextext}\n% provide some legacy IEEEtran environments\n\n\n% V1.8a no more support for these legacy commands\n%\\def\\authorblockA{\\@IEEElegacywarn{authorblockA}{IEEEauthorblockA}\\IEEEauthorblockA}\n%\\def\\authorblockN{\\@IEEElegacywarn{authorblockN}{IEEEauthorblockN}\\IEEEauthorblockN}\n%\\def\\authorrefmark{\\@IEEElegacywarn{authorrefmark}{IEEEauthorrefmark}\\IEEEauthorrefmark}\n%\\def\\PARstart{\\@IEEElegacywarn{PARstart}{IEEEPARstart}\\IEEEPARstart}\n%\\def\\pubid{\\@IEEElegacywarn{pubid}{IEEEpubid}\\IEEEpubid}\n%\\def\\pubidadjcol{\\@IEEElegacywarn{pubidadjcol}{IEEEpubidadjcol}\\IEEEpubidadjcol}\n%\\def\\specialpapernotice{\\@IEEElegacywarn{specialpapernotice}{IEEEspecialpapernotice}\\IEEEspecialpapernotice}\n% and environments\n%\\def\\keywords{\\@IEEElegacywarn{keywords}{IEEEkeywords}\\IEEEkeywords}\n%\\def\\endkeywords{\\endIEEEkeywords}\n% V1.8 no more support for legacy IED list commands\n%\\let\\labelindent\\IEEElabelindent\n%\\def\\calcleftmargin{\\@IEEElegacywarn{calcleftmargin}{IEEEcalcleftmargin}\\IEEEcalcleftmargin}\n%\\def\\setlabelwidth{\\@IEEElegacywarn{setlabelwidth}{IEEEsetlabelwidth}\\IEEEsetlabelwidth}\n%\\def\\usemathlabelsep{\\@IEEElegacywarn{usemathlabelsep}{IEEEusemathlabelsep}\\IEEEusemathlabelsep}\n%\\def\\iedlabeljustifyc{\\@IEEElegacywarn{iedlabeljustifyc}{IEEEiedlabeljustifyc}\\IEEEiedlabeljustifyc}\n%\\def\\iedlabeljustifyl{\\@IEEElegacywarn{iedlabeljustifyl}{IEEEiedlabeljustifyl}\\IEEEiedlabeljustifyl}\n%\\def\\iedlabeljustifyr{\\@IEEElegacywarn{iedlabeljustifyr}{IEEEiedlabeljustifyr}\\IEEEiedlabeljustifyr}\n% V1.8 no more support for QED and proof stuff\n%\\def\\QED{\\@IEEElegacywarn{QED}{IEEEQED}\\IEEEQED}\n%\\def\\QEDclosed{\\@IEEElegacywarn{QEDclosed}{IEEEQEDclosed}\\IEEEQEDclosed}\n%\\def\\QEDopen{\\@IEEElegacywarn{QEDopen}{IEEEQEDopen}\\IEEEQEDopen}\n%\\AtBeginDocument{\\def\\proof{\\@IEEElegacywarn{proof}{IEEEproof}\\IEEEproof}\\def\\endproof{\\endIEEEproof}}\n% V1.8 no longer support biography or biographynophoto\n%\\def\\biography{\\@IEEElegacywarn{biography}{IEEEbiography}\\IEEEbiography}\n%\\def\\biographynophoto{\\@IEEElegacywarn{biographynophoto}{IEEEbiographynophoto}\\IEEEbiographynophoto}\n%\\def\\endbiography{\\endIEEEbiography}\n%\\def\\endbiographynophoto{\\endIEEEbiographynophoto}\n% V1.7 and later no longer supports \\overrideIEEEmargins\n%\\def\\overrideIEEEmargins{%\n%\\typeout{** WARNING: \\string\\overrideIEEEmargins \\space no longer supported (line \\the\\inputlineno).}%\n%\\typeout{** Use the \\string\\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin, \\string\\CLASSINPUToutersidemargin \\space controls instead.}}\n\n\\endinput\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% End of IEEEtran.cls %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% That's all folks!\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main_pimrc.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[10pt, conference]{IEEEtran}\n\\IEEEoverridecommandlockouts\n\n\n\\setlength{\\columnsep}{0.25in}\n\\addtolength{\\topmargin}{0.07in}\n\\addtolength{\\textheight}{-0.07in}\n\n\\usepackage{cite}\n\\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts}\n\n\\usepackage{amsthm}\n\\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}\n\\newtheorem{lem}{Lemma}\n\\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}\n\n\\usepackage[linesnumbered, ruled]{algorithm2e}\n\\setlength{\\algomargin}{2em} \n\\SetNlSty{}{}{:} \n\\let\\oldnl\\nl\n\\newcommand{\\nlnonumber}{\\renewcommand{\\nl}{\\let\\nl\\oldnl}}\n\n\\usepackage{url}\n\\def\\UrlBreaks{\\do\\A\\do\\B\\do\\C\\do\\D\\do\\E\\do\\F\\do\\G\\do\\H\\do\\I\\do\\J\n\\do\\K\\do\\L\\do\\M\\do\\N\\do\\O\\do\\P\\do\\Q\\do\\R\\do\\S\\do\\T\\do\\U\\do\\V\n\\do\\W\\do\\X\\do\\Y\\do\\Z\\do\\[\\do\\\\\\do\\]\\do\\^\\do\\_\\do\\`\\do\\a\\do\\b\n\\do\\c\\do\\d\\do\\e\\do\\f\\do\\g\\do\\h\\do\\i\\do\\j\\do\\k\\do\\l\\do\\m\\do\\n\n\\do\\o\\do\\p\\do\\q\\do\\r\\do\\s\\do\\t\\do\\u\\do\\v\\do\\w\\do\\x\\do\\y\\do\\z\n\\do\\.\\do\\@\\do\\\\\\do\\/\\do\\!\\do\\_\\do\\-\\do\\|\\do\\;\\do\\>\\do\\]\\do\\)\\do\\,\n\\do\\?\\do\\'\\do+\\do\\=\\do\\#\\do\\1\\do\\2\\do\\3\\do\\4\\do\\5\\do\\6\\do\\7\\do\\8\\do\\9\\do\\0} \n\n\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{textcomp}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{xspace}\n\\usepackage{tabularx}\n\\usepackage{wrapfig}\n\\usepackage{pbox}\n\\usepackage{bbding}\n\\usepackage{textcomp}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\n\\usepackage[linesnumbered, ruled]{algorithm2e}\n\n\\usepackage{bbm}\n\\usepackage{dblfloatfix}\n\\usepackage{pifont}\n\\usepackage{bm}\n\\usepackage{enumitem}\n\\usepackage{svg}\n\\usepackage{comment}\n\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{diagbox}\n\n\\usepackage{rotating}\n\\usepackage{tabularray}\n\n\n\\def\\BibTeX{{\\rm B\\kern-.05em{\\sc i\\kern-.025em b}\\kern-.08em\n T\\kern-.1667em\\lower.7ex\\hbox{E}\\kern-.125emX}} \n\n\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\n\\title{Toward Efficient Sensing in Multi-Device ISCC by Removing Frequency Domain Redundancy}\n\n\n\\author{\n\\IEEEauthorblockN{Ziqi Ye$^{1}$, Yinghui He$^{1\\dagger}$, Weiwei Chen$^{1}$, Guanding Yu$^{1}$, \\IEEEmembership{Senior Member,~IEEE}, and Rui Zhang$^{2}$, \\IEEEmembership{Fellow,~IEEE}}\n\\IEEEauthorblockA{$^{1}$College of Information Science and Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China}\n\\IEEEauthorblockA{$^{2}$Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore}\n\\IEEEauthorblockA{Email: \\{yeziqi, 2014hyh, 22331145, yuguanding\\}@zju.edu.cn, elezhang@nus.edu.sg, $\\dagger$~Corresponding author}\n}\n\n\n\n\\maketitle\n\\begin{abstract}\nIntegrated sensing, communication, and computation (ISCC) is envisioned as a key enabler for intelligent services in future wireless networks. However, in multi-device ISCC systems, directly offloading full orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) sensing data to the edge may incur excessive overhead, thereby limiting sensing performance under practical resource constraints. In this paper, we propose a subcarrier selection-based sensing framework for multi-device ISCC systems, where frequency-domain redundancy in OFDM sensing data is removed during local preprocessing to reduce sensing data transmission and processing overhead. Based on the proposed framework, we establish analytical models for sensing accuracy, delay, and energy consumption, and formulate a sensing accuracy maximization problem under practical resource constraints. To solve this problem, we develop an alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM)-based algorithm. Experiments on commodity wireless devices validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework and show that it consistently outperforms three baseline schemes under various resource constraints.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\n\\section{Introduction}\nAs 6G networks evolve toward greater intelligence and ubiquitous connectivity, wireless systems are expected to support not only reliable communications but also human activity sensing~\\cite{liu2022integrated}. In this context, integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) enables applications such as human detection, localization, and activity recognition by jointly supporting sensing and communication~\\cite{wei2023integrated, ye2026practical, zhang2025intelligent, he2025task}. Many emerging applications further require timely processing of sensed information for intelligent decision making, which drives the evolution from ISAC to integrated sensing, communication, and computation (ISCC)~\\cite{wen2023taskair, yang2020federated}. As a promising architecture for edge intelligence, ISCC further integrates sensing, wireless transmission, and computation in a unified framework~\\cite{wen2024survey}. In multi-device scenarios, however, each Internet of Things (IoT) device continuously collects a large volume of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) sensing data over multiple frequency subcarriers and offloads them to the edge for inference. Directly transmitting full sensing data from all devices may incur excessive communication and computation overhead, thereby limiting sensing performance under practical latency, device energy, and edge computing resource constraints~\\cite{li2022joint}. Therefore, efficient local preprocessing is needed to reduce unnecessary sensing overhead while preserving critical sensing information.\n\nExisting studies have shown that local preprocessing before edge offloading is an effective way to improve sensing efficiency. For example, schemes based on action detection can avoid unnecessary transmission for static windows~\\cite{he2024integrated}, while recent studies have further exploited temporal characteristics to reduce the upload of less informative sensing windows~\\cite{chen2025sensing}. These studies demonstrate that reducing redundant sensing data before transmission is important for improving the overall efficiency of ISCC systems. However, existing efforts mainly focus on how to reduce temporal redundancy. In OFDM-based wireless sensing, adjacent subcarriers are close in frequency and thus often carry highly correlated activity-related information, which implies that substantial redundancy may also exist in the frequency domain. Once a sensing window is selected for transmission, directly offloading OFDM sensing data from all subcarriers may incur considerable overhead without providing commensurate sensing gains. Therefore, how to remove redundancy across subcarriers remains an important yet underexplored problem in multi-device ISCC systems.\n\nMotivated by the above, in this paper, we propose a subcarrier selection-based sensing framework for multi-device ISCC systems. In the proposed framework, each device first performs lightweight local preprocessing and then retains only representative subcarriers before offloading sensing data to the edge, thereby effectively reducing frequency-domain redundancy in multi-subcarrier OFDM sensing data. Based on this framework, we establish analytical models for sensing accuracy, delay, and energy consumption, and formulate a sensing accuracy maximization problem under practical constraints on delay, energy, and edge computing. To solve the optimization problem, we further develop an alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM)-based algorithm to jointly optimize local sensing parameters and global resource allocation. Experiment results on commodity wireless devices validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. In particular, they show that the proposed subcarrier selection mechanism can substantially reduce sensing overhead with limited accuracy loss, while the overall scheme consistently outperforms three baseline schemes under different constraints.\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.4\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[height=3.6cm,keepaspectratio]{fig_pimrc/system.pdf}\n \\vspace{-4ex}\n \\caption{The considered ISCC system and the proposed sensing framework.}\n \\label{fig:system}\n \\end{minipage}\\hfill\n \\addtocounter{figure}{1}\n \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.25\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[height=3.4cm,keepaspectratio]{fig_pimrc/Autocorrelation.pdf}\n \\vspace{-4ex}\n \\caption{$A_k(\\Delta n_k)$ vs. $\\Delta n_k$ for five IoT devices.}\n \\label{fig:Autocorrelation}\n \\end{minipage}\\hfill\n \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.25\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[height=3.6cm,keepaspectratio]{fig_pimrc/acc_F_Delta_n.pdf}\n \\vspace{-4ex}\n \\caption{Sensing accuracy vs. sampling rate and subcarrier selection interval.}\n \\label{fig:acc_F_Delta_n}\n \\end{minipage}\n \\vspace{-2.5ex}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\setcounter{figure}{1}\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.8\\linewidth]{fig_pimrc/time_frequency_resource.pdf}\n \\vspace{-2ex}\n \\caption{Time-frequency resource allocation for the considered ISCC system.}\n \\vspace{-3ex}\n \\label{fig:time_frequency_resource}\n\\end{figure}\n\\setcounter{figure}{4}\n\nThe rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section~\\ref{sec:sys} introduces the system model and the proposed sensing framework. Section~\\ref{sec:per_ana} presents the performance analysis and formulates the sensing accuracy maximization problem. Section~\\ref{sec:algorithm} develops the ADMM-based algorithm. Section~\\ref{sec:evalation} provides the evaluation results. Finally, Section~\\ref{sec:con} concludes this paper.\n\n\n\n\\section{System Model and Sensing Framework}\n\\label{sec:sys}\n\\subsection{ISCC System}\n\\label{sec:iscc_sys}\n\nWe consider a multi-device ISCC system consisting of one base station (BS) equipped with an edge server and $K$ IoT devices, where each device is equipped with a dual-functional OFDM transceiver. As shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:system}, each IoT device continuously senses its local environment, performs lightweight local preprocessing, and then offloads the resulting OFDM sensing data to the BS for edge-side activity recognition. In this work, we propose a device-side subcarrier selection module to remove redundancy across subcarriers before data offloading, thereby reducing transmission and processing overhead. This module constitutes the key new design in the proposed sensing framework.\n\nTo support multi-device sensing and communication, the BS adopts time division multiple access (TDMA) for device access. As illustrated in Fig.~\\ref{fig:time_frequency_resource}, during its allocated time, each IoT device alternates between sensing and uplink transmission while occupying the full system bandwidth $B$. This design enables seamless integration of sensing, communication, and edge intelligence under practical resource constraints.\n\n\n\\subsection{Sensing Procedure with Subcarrier Selection}\n\\label{sec:device_edge_procedure}\n\nFor the $n$-th subcarrier of device $k$, let $x_{k,n}$ and $y_{k,n}$ denote the transmitted signal and the corresponding echo, respectively. The OFDM sensing signal is then defined as $h_{k,n}={y_{k,n}}/{x_{k,n}}$. Over a sensing window of duration $T^{\\mathrm{s}}$ and sensing sampling rate $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$, device $k$ collects $T^{\\mathrm{s}}F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$ samples on each subcarrier and forms the sensing data matrix $\\bm{H}_k=[\\bm{h}_{k,1},\\bm{h}_{k,2},\\ldots,\\bm{h}_{k,N}]^T\n\\in \\mathbb{C}^{N\\times (T^{\\mathrm{s}}F_k^{\\mathrm{s}})}$,\nwhere $\\bm{h}_{k,n}$ denotes the data sequence of the $n$-th subcarrier. Let $\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$ denote the time required for one sensing cycle. Then, the sensing operation of device $k$ occupies a time fraction $\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{s}}F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$ within unit time.\n\nDirectly offloading $\\bm{H}_k$ to the BS would incur substantial transmission and computation overhead. To address this issue, each device performs local preprocessing before data transmission, including the action detection module~\\cite{he2024integrated} and, more importantly, the proposed subcarrier selection module. The latter is designed to remove redundant sensing information across subcarriers before offloading.\n\nAt the beginning of local preprocessing, the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) of $\\bm{h}_{k,n}$ is computed as\n$w_{k,n}[f]\n=\n({1}/{\\sqrt{T^{\\mathrm{s}}F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}}})\n\\sum_{m=1}^{T^{\\mathrm{s}}F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}}\nh_{k,n}[m]\n\\exp\\!\\left(\n-{j2\\pi fm}/({T^{\\mathrm{s}}F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}})\n\\right)$,\nwhere $f=0,\\ldots,T^{\\mathrm{s}}F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}\\!-\\!1$. Focusing on the activity-related high-frequency range $[f^{\\mathrm{L}},f^{\\mathrm{U}}]$, the corresponding power spectrum is\n$e_{k,n}[f]=|w_{k,n}[f]|^2, f\\in [f^{\\mathrm{L}},f^{\\mathrm{U}}]$.\nFor the action detection module, according to~\\cite{he2024integrated}, device $k$ computes the average high-frequency power on the first subcarrier as\n$P_k=(1/{T^{\\mathrm{s}}F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}})\n\\sum_{f=f^{\\mathrm{L}}}^{f^{\\mathrm{U}}} e_{k,1}[f]$.\nIf $P_k<\\delta_k$, the target is regarded as static and no sensing data are offloaded. Otherwise, the target is regarded as dynamic, and the proposed subcarrier selection module is activated.\n\nThe subcarrier selection module extracts a reduced sensing data matrix $\\tilde{\\bm{H}}_k$ from $\\bm{H}_k$ by removing redundant subcarriers. The key idea behind our design is that adjacent subcarriers often carry correlated sensing information, so retaining only representative subcarriers can significantly reduce overhead with limited information loss. To this end, we characterize the redundancy among subcarriers through the activity-related high-frequency power spectrum. Specifically, we define\n$\\bm{e}_{k,n}\n=\n[e_{k,n}[f^{\\mathrm{L}}],\\ldots,e_{k,n}[f^{\\mathrm{U}}]]^H\n\\in \\mathbb{R}^{(f^{\\mathrm{U}}-f^{\\mathrm{L}}+1)\\times 1}$,\nand the subcarrier similarity function\n\\begin{equation}\nA_k(\\Delta n_k)\n=\n\\frac{1}{N-\\Delta n_k}\n\\sum_{n=1}^{N-\\Delta n_k}\n\\frac{\\bm{e}_{k,n}\\cdot \\bm{e}_{k,n+\\Delta n_k}}\n{\\|\\bm{e}_{k,n}\\|\\,\\|\\bm{e}_{k,n+\\Delta n_k}\\|},\n\\end{equation}\nwhich measures the average cosine similarity between subcarriers separated by $\\Delta n_k$ over the entire bandwidth. Fig.~\\ref{fig:Autocorrelation} shows that $A_k(\\Delta n_k)$ typically decreases monotonically with $\\Delta n_k$. This monotonicity indicates that, as the subcarrier spacing increases, the average similarity between subcarriers gradually decreases, and thus the redundancy among them becomes weaker. Therefore, $A_k(\\Delta n_k)$ can be used as a proxy for the amount of preserved sensing information when one subcarrier is retained every $\\Delta n_k+1$ subcarriers. Given a similarity threshold $\\eta_k$, only subcarrier intervals satisfying $A_k(\\Delta n_k)\\ge \\eta_k$ are admissible. In this way, $\\eta_k$ excludes overly aggressive selection intervals and defines a low-information-loss region for subcarrier selection, while the final $\\Delta n_k$ will be jointly optimized later together with the other system parameters. Under a given admissible interval $\\Delta n_k$, one subcarrier is retained every $\\Delta n_k+1$ subcarriers, and the reduced sensing data matrix is given by $\\tilde{\\bm{H}}_k\\in \\mathbb{C}^{\\tilde N_k\\times (T^{\\mathrm{s}}F_k^{\\mathrm{s}})}$, where\n$\\tilde N_k=\\left\\lceil {N}/({\\Delta n_k+1})\\right\\rceil$.\n\nAfter local preprocessing, device $k$ offloads $\\tilde{\\bm{H}}_k$ to the BS for edge-side recognition. The instantaneous uplink transmission rate of device $k$ is\n$R_k\n=\n({B}/{N})\n\\sum_{n=1}^{N}\n\\log_2\n(\n1+{|h_{k,n}^{\\mathrm{c}}|^2 P_k^{\\mathrm{t}}}/({N\\sigma^2})\n)$,\nwhere $P_k^{\\mathrm{t}}/N$ is the transmit power allocated to each subcarrier, $h_{k,n}^{\\mathrm{c}}$ is the uplink channel gain on the $n$-th subcarrier, and $\\sigma^2$ is the noise power. Since TDMA is adopted, let $\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}}$ denote the communication time fraction allocated to device $k$ within unit time. Then, the average uplink data rate of device $k$ within unit time is $\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}} R_k$. After receiving all $\\tilde{\\bm{H}}_k$, the edge server performs convolutional neural network (CNN)-based activity recognition.\n\n\\section{Performance Analysis and Problem Formulation}\n\\label{sec:per_ana}\nIn this section, we characterize the sensing accuracy, sensing delay, and energy consumption, and then formulate the sensing accuracy maximization problem.\n\n\\subsection{Sensing Accuracy}\n\\label{sec:sen_acc}\nWe consider an $I$-class activity recognition task, where the first class ($i=1$) represents the static type and the remaining classes correspond to dynamic activity types. The sensing performance is affected by the device-side action detection and subcarrier selection modules, as well as the edge-side activity recognition module. Specifically, action detection first distinguishes static and dynamic sensing windows, while for the detected dynamic windows, the proposed subcarrier selection module and the edge-side CNN further determine the final recognition performance.\n\nFollowing~\\cite{he2024integrated}, the performance of action detection is characterized by the miss rate $p_{k,i}^{\\mathrm{o}}$ and the false positive rate $p_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{l}}$. Specifically, $p_{k,i}^{\\mathrm{o}}$ denotes the probability that an instance of the $i$-th dynamic type is incorrectly recognized as static, while $p_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{l}}$ denotes the probability that a static instance is incorrectly recognized as dynamic. These two probabilities are determined by $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$ and the detection threshold $\\delta_k$. To ensure reliable action detection, they are required to satisfy $p_{k,i}^{\\mathrm{o}} \\le p^{\\max}, i=2,\\ldots,I$ and $p_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{l}} \\le p^{\\max}$, where $p^{\\max}$ is a predefined reliability threshold. Under these constraints, the errors introduced by action detection are sufficiently small and are thus neglected in the sensing accuracy model. Accordingly, we use the edge-side recognition accuracy for the retained dynamic sensing data to approximate the overall sensing accuracy. Let $\\alpha_k(F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}, \\Delta n_k)$ denote the recognition accuracy when device $k$ adopts sensing sampling rate $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$ and subcarrier selection interval $\\Delta n_k$. As shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:acc_F_Delta_n}, experiment results show that $\\alpha_k(F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}, \\Delta n_k)$ increases with $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$ and decreases with $\\Delta n_k$. Then, the sensing accuracy metric of device $k$ is given by\n$A_k^{\\mathrm{s}}\n=\np_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{m}}\n+\n\\sum_{i=2}^{I} p_{k,i}^{\\mathrm{m}} \\alpha_k(F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}, \\Delta n_k)$,\nwhere $p_{k,i}^{\\mathrm{m}}$ denotes the occurrence probability of the $i$-th activity type and satisfies $\\sum_{i=1}^{I} p_{k,i}^{\\mathrm{m}}=1$.\n\n\\subsection{Delay and Energy Consumption}\n\\label{sec:delay_energy}\nFor device $k$, the sensing delay consists of sensing, local preprocessing, transmission, and edge recognition. The sensing delay is $T_k^{\\mathrm{sen}} = T^{\\mathrm{s}}$. Using a standard analysis based on operation counts, the local preprocessing delay is approximated by\n$T_k^{\\mathrm{comp}}\n=\n\\gamma_k^{\\mathrm{c,1}} T^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}\n\\log(T^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}})\n+\n(\n\\gamma_k^{\\mathrm{c,2}} N T^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}\n\\log(T^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}})\n+\n\\gamma_k^{\\mathrm{c,3}} N^2\n)\n(1-p_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{m}}),$\nwhere $\\gamma_k^{\\mathrm{c,1}}$, $\\gamma_k^{\\mathrm{c,2}}$, and $\\gamma_k^{\\mathrm{c,3}}$ are delay parameters.\nThen, let $V^{\\mathrm{L}}$ denote the number of bits per matrix element and $\\tilde N_k=\\lceil N/(\\Delta n_k+1)\\rceil$ denote the number of retained subcarriers after selection. The transmission delay is\n$T_k^{\\mathrm{trans}}\n=\n{\n\\tilde N_k T^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}} V^{\\mathrm{L}} (1-p_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{m}})\n}/({\n\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}} R_k\n}),$\nand the edge recognition delay is\n$T_k^{\\mathrm{CNN}}\n=\n{\n\\tilde N_k T^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}} C^{\\mathrm{e}} (1-p_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{m}})\n}/{\nf_k^{\\mathrm{e}}\n}$,\nwhere $f_k^{\\mathrm{e}}$ denotes the edge computing resource allocated to device $k$ and $C^{\\mathrm{e}}$ is the computational cost per matrix element. Hence, the overall sensing delay is\n$T_k^{\\mathrm{over}}\n=\nT_k^{\\mathrm{sen}} + T_k^{\\mathrm{comp}} + T_k^{\\mathrm{trans}} + T_k^{\\mathrm{CNN}}$.\n\nSince the BS is externally powered, we only consider the energy consumption of IoT devices. The sensing, local computation, and communication energy consumption are respectively given by $E_k^{\\mathrm{sen}} = P_k^{\\mathrm{sen}} T^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$, $E_k^{\\mathrm{comp}} = P_k^{\\mathrm{comp}} T_k^{\\mathrm{comp}}$, and\n$E_k^{\\mathrm{trans}}\n=\n\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}} P_k^{\\mathrm{t}} T_k^{\\mathrm{trans}}\n=\n{\nP_k^{\\mathrm{t}} \\tilde N_k T^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}} V^{\\mathrm{L}} (1-p_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{m}})\n}/{\nR_k\n}$.\nTherefore, the total energy consumption of device $k$ is $E_k^{\\mathrm{over}} = E_k^{\\mathrm{sen}} + E_k^{\\mathrm{comp}} + E_k^{\\mathrm{trans}}$.\n\n\\subsection{Problem Formulation}\nOur objective is to maximize the average sensing accuracy of all IoT devices under delay, energy, and edge computing resource constraints. The resulting problem is formulated as\n\\begin{subequations}\n\\label{eq:obj_fun}\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\n\\max\\limits_{\\left\\{\\!\\substack{F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}, \\Delta n_k, \\\\\n\\delta_k, \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}}, {f_k^{\\mathrm{e}}}}\\!\\right\\}}\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\n\\frac{1}{K}\\!\\! \\sum_{k=1}^{K} \\!A_k^{\\mathrm{s}} \\!\\!=\\!\\! \\frac{1}{K}\\!\\! \\sum_{k=1}^{K} (p_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{m}}\\!\\!+\\!\\!\\!\\sum_{i=2}^{I} p_{k,i}^{\\mathrm{m}} \\alpha_k(F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}, \\Delta n_k)),\n~~~~~~\\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\text{s.t.} &\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\np_{k,i}^{\\mathrm{o}} \\le p^{\\max},\\ i=2,\\dots,I,\n\\label{eq:c1} \\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\np_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{l}} \\le p^{\\max},\n\\label{eq:c2} \\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\nA_k(\\Delta n_k) \\ge \\eta_k,\n\\label{eq:c3} \\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\nT_k^{\\mathrm{over}} \\!\\!= \\! T_k^{\\mathrm{sen}} \\!+ \\!T_k^{\\mathrm{comp}} \\!+ \\!T_k^{\\mathrm{trans}} \\!+ \\!T_k^{\\mathrm{CNN}} \\!\\le\\! T_k^{\\max},\n\\label{eq:c4} \\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\nE_k^{\\mathrm{over}} \\! = \\! E_k^{\\mathrm{sen}} + E_k^{\\mathrm{comp}} + E_k^{\\mathrm{trans}} \\le E_k^{\\max},\n\\label{eq:c5} \\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\n\\sum_{k=1}^{K} (\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}} + \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}}) \\le 1,\n\\label{eq:c6} \\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\n\\sum_{k=1}^{K} f_k^{\\mathrm{e}} \\le f^{\\mathrm{e}},\n\\label{eq:c7} \\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\nF_k^{\\mathrm{s}} \\in \\mathbb{Z}^{+},\n\\label{eq:c8} \\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\n\\Delta n_k \\in \\mathbb{Z},~ 0 \\le \\Delta n_k \\le N-1,\n\\label{eq:c9} \\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\n\\delta_k, \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}}, f_k^{\\mathrm{e}} \\ge 0,\n\\label{eq:c10}\n\\end{eqnarray}\n\\end{subequations}\nwhere $T_k^{\\max}$ denotes the maximum allowable sensing delay of device $k$, $E_k^{\\max}$ denotes the energy budget of device $k$, and $f^{\\mathrm{e}}$ denotes the total available edge computing resource. Problem~\\eqref{eq:obj_fun} is difficult to solve directly due to the coupling among sensing, communication, and computing variables. In the next section, we decompose it into tractable subproblems and develop an efficient algorithm.\n\n\n\\section{Sensing Accuracy Maximization}\n\\label{sec:algorithm}\n\nIn this section, we decompose problem~\\eqref{eq:obj_fun} into two subproblems and then develop an ADMM-based algorithm.\n\n\\subsection{Problem Decomposition}\n\nTo solve problem~\\eqref{eq:obj_fun}, we adopt the ADMM method~\\cite{wang2019global}. We first introduce a global auxiliary variable $\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{sum}}$ and a local auxiliary variable $\\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e}}$, satisfying $\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{sum}} = \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}} + \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}}$ and $\\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e}} = f_k^{\\mathrm{e}}$ for $k=1,\\ldots,K$. Then, constraint~\\eqref{eq:c4} can be rewritten as\n\\begin{equation}\nT_k^{\\mathrm{sen}} \\!+\\! T_k^{\\mathrm{comp}} \\!+\\! T_k^{\\mathrm{trans}} \\!+\\! {\\tilde{N}_k T_k^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}} C^{\\mathrm{e}} ( 1 \\!-\\! p_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{m}} )}/{\\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e}}} \\!\\leq\\! T_k^{\\max}.\n\\label{eq:c4_new}\n\\end{equation}\nMoreover, constraint~\\eqref{eq:c6} becomes $\\sum_{k=1}^{K} \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{sum}} \\le 1$.\n\nBy dualizing the above two coupling equalities, problem~\\eqref{eq:obj_fun} is decomposed into a device-side accuracy maximization subproblem and a global resource allocation subproblem. For device $k$, the subproblem is\n\\begin{subequations}\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\n\\max\\limits_{\\left\\{\\!\\substack{F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}, \\Delta n_k, \\\\\n\\delta_k, \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}}, \\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e}}}\\!\\right\\}}\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\np_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{m}} \\!\\!+\\!\\! \\sum_{i=2}^{I} p_{k,i}^{\\mathrm{m}} \\alpha_k (F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}, \\Delta n_k)\n\\!-\\! \\frac{\\rho_2}{2} \\Big\\| f_k^{\\mathrm{e}} \\!\\!-\\!\\! \\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e}} \\!\\!+\\!\\! \\frac{\\beta_{2,k}}{\\rho_2} \\Big\\|^2\n\\nonumber \\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\n- \\frac{\\rho_1}{2} \\Big\\|\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{sum}} - (\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}} + \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}}) + \\frac{\\beta_{1,k}}{\\rho_1} \\Big\\|^2,\n\\label{eq:subproblem_1}\n~~~~~~\\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\text{s.t.} &\\!\\!\\!\\!\n\\eqref{eq:c1}\\text{--}\\eqref{eq:c3},\n\\eqref{eq:c5},\n\\eqref{eq:c8}\\text{--}\\eqref{eq:c10},\n\\text{and}\\,\\eqref{eq:c4_new}.\n\\nonumber\n\\end{eqnarray}\n\\end{subequations}\nThe corresponding global resource allocation subproblem is\n\\begin{subequations}\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\n\\min\\limits_{\\left\\{\\substack{\\tau_1^{\\mathrm{sum}},\\ldots,\\tau_K^{\\mathrm{sum}}, \\\\\nf_1^{\\mathrm{e}},\\ldots, f_K^{\\mathrm{e}}}\\right\\}}\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\n\\frac{1}{K} \\sum_{k=1}^{K} \\frac{\\rho_1}{2} \\Big\\| \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{sum}} - (\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}} + \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}}) + \\frac{\\beta_{1,k}}{\\rho_1} \\Big\\|^2\n\\nonumber \\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\n+ \\frac{1}{K} \\sum_{k=1}^{K} \\frac{\\rho_2}{2} \\Big\\| f_k^{\\mathrm{e}} - \\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e}} + \\frac{\\beta_{2,k}}{\\rho_2} \\Big\\|^2 ,\n\\label{eq:subproblem_2}\n~~~~~~\\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\text{s.t.} &\\!\\!\\!\\!\n\\eqref{eq:c7},\n\\eqref{eq:c10},\n\\text{and } \\sum_{k=1}^{K} \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{sum}} \\le 1.\n\\nonumber\n\\end{eqnarray}\n\\end{subequations}\nThe dual variables are updated as\n\\begin{align}\n\\beta_{1,k}^{(i+1)}\n&=\n\\beta_{1,k}^{(i)} \\!+\\! \\rho_1 (\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{sum}} \\!-\\! (\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}} \\!+\\! \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}}) ), k = 1, \\cdots, K,\n\\label{eq:beta_1_update}\n\\\\\n\\beta_{2,k}^{(i+1)}\n&=\n\\beta_{2,k}^{(i)} \\!+\\! \\rho_2 (f_k^{\\mathrm{e}} \\!-\\! \\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e}}), k = 1, \\cdots, K.\n\\label{eq:beta_2_update}\n\\end{align}\n\n\\subsection{Sensing Accuracy Maximization for Each Device}\n\nWe next simplify problem~\\eqref{eq:subproblem_1} by transforming several coupled constraints. Since constraints~\\eqref{eq:c1} and~\\eqref{eq:c2} depend on both $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$ and $\\delta_k$, while $\\delta_k$ only appears in these two constraints, they can be converted into an equivalent lower bound on $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$. Specifically, for a given $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$, the feasibility of constraints~\\eqref{eq:c1} and~\\eqref{eq:c2} can be checked by properly choosing $\\delta_k$, which determines the tradeoff between the miss rate and the false positive rate. Following~\\cite{he2024integrated}, increasing $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$ improves this feasibility. Therefore, there exists a minimum feasible sampling rate, denoted by $F_k^{\\mathrm{s,min}}$, which can be obtained offline by bisection search. As a result, constraints~\\eqref{eq:c1} and~\\eqref{eq:c2} are equivalently replaced by $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}} \\ge F_k^{\\mathrm{s,min}}$.\n\nSimilarly, since $A_k(\\Delta n_k)$ is monotonically decreasing with $\\Delta n_k$, constraint~\\eqref{eq:c3} is equivalent to $\\Delta n_k \\le \\Delta n_k^{\\max}$. Moreover, constraint~\\eqref{eq:c5} can be equivalently transformed into $\\Delta n_k \\ge u(F_k^{\\mathrm{s}})$, where $u(F_k^{\\mathrm{s}})$ denotes the minimum subcarrier selection interval that satisfies the energy budget for a given $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$. Its explicit form is omitted here due to the complexity of the expression. Then, problem~\\eqref{eq:subproblem_1} can be reformulated as\n\\begin{subequations}\n\\label{pb:sp_1_new}\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\n\\max\\limits_{\\left\\{\\!\\substack{F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}, \\Delta n_k, \\\\\n\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}}, \\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e}} }\\!\\right\\}} \n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\np_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{m}} \\!+\\! \\sum_{i=2}^{I} p_{k,i}^{\\mathrm{m}} \\alpha_k (F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}, \\Delta n_k ) \\!- \\! \\frac{\\rho_2}{2} \\!\\| f_k^{\\mathrm{e}} \\!\\!-\\!\\! \\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e}} \\!\\!+\\!\\! \\frac{\\beta_{2,k}}{\\rho_2} \\!\\|^2 \\nonumber \\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\n- \\frac{\\rho_1}{2} \\!\\| \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{sum}}\\!\\! \\!-\\!\\! (\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}} \\!+\\! \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}}) \\!\\!+\\!\\! \\frac{\\beta_{1,k}}{\\rho_1} \\|^2\n\\!\\!\\!,\n\\label{eq:subproblem_1_new_1}\n~~~~~~\\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\text{s.t.} &\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\n\\eqref{eq:c4_new}, \nF_k^{\\mathrm{s}} \\!\\ge\\! F_k^{\\mathrm{s,min}}, F_k^{\\mathrm{s}} \\!\\in\\! \\mathbb{Z}^{+}, \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}}, \\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e}} \\!\\ge\\! 0, \\Delta n_k \\!\\in\\! \\mathbb{Z},\n\\nonumber \\\\\n&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!&\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\\!\nu(F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}) \\!\\le\\! \\Delta n_k \\!\\le\\! \\min(N\\!-\\!1,\\Delta n_k^{\\max}).\n\\end{eqnarray}\n\\end{subequations}\n\nTo solve~\\eqref{pb:sp_1_new}, we relax $\\Delta n_k$ to a continuous variable and simplify the ceiling operation in $\\tilde N_k$ in~\\eqref{eq:c4_new}. For a given $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$, it is easy to prove that the resulting problem is convex with respect to $\\Delta n_k$, $\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}}$, and $\\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e}}$. However, since $\\alpha_k(F_k^{\\mathrm{s}},\\Delta n_k)$ does not admit an explicit gradient, the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions cannot be directly applied. Therefore, we adopt a two-layer search procedure. In the outer layer, $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$ is enumerated over $[F_k^{\\mathrm{s,min}}, F_k^{\\mathrm{s,max}}]$, where $F_k^{\\mathrm{s,max}}$ is determined by the delay, energy, and time allocation constraints. In the inner layer, $\\Delta n_k$ is optimized by golden-section search over $[u(F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}), \\Delta n_k^{\\max}]$.\n\nFor each candidate pair $(F_k^{\\mathrm{s}},\\Delta n_k)$, the remaining variables $\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}}$ and $\\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e}}$ are updated from the KKT conditions. If constraint~\\eqref{eq:c4_new} is inactive, the optimal update is directly given by $\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c},*} \\!=\\! \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{sum}} \\!-\\! \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}} \\!+\\! {\\beta_{1,k}}/{\\rho_1}$ and $\\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e},*} \\!=\\! f_k^{\\mathrm{e}} \\!+\\! {\\beta_{2,k}}/{\\rho_2}$. Otherwise, $\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c},*}$ and $\\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e},*}$ are determined by a one-dimensional bisection search over the associated dual variable until~\\eqref{eq:c4_new} holds with equality. After the continuous solution is obtained, $\\Delta n_k$ is rounded up to the nearest feasible integer satisfying~\\eqref{eq:c4_new}, and the best objective value over all candidate $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$ is selected.\n\n\\subsection{Edge Resource Allocation}\n\nIt is easy to prove that Problem~\\eqref{eq:subproblem_2} is convex. Applying the KKT conditions yields\n\\begin{align}\n&\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{sum},*}\n=\n(\n(\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}} + \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}})\n- \\frac{\\beta_{1,k}}{\\rho_1}\n- \\frac{K\\mu_1^*}{\\rho_1}\n)^+,\n\\label{eq:tau_k_sum_*}\n\\\\\n&f_k^{\\mathrm{e},*}\n=\n(\n\\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e}}\n- \\frac{\\beta_{2,k}}{\\rho_2}\n- \\frac{K\\mu_2^*}{\\rho_2}\n)^+,\n\\nonumber\n\\end{align}\nwhere $(x)^+=\\max(x,0)$, and $\\mu_1^*$ and $\\mu_2^*$ are chosen to satisfy $\\sum_{k=1}^{K}\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{sum},*}\\le 1$ and $\\sum_{k=1}^{K}f_k^{\\mathrm{e},*}\\le f^{\\mathrm{e}}$, respectively.\n\nThe update can be implemented as follows. We first set $\\mu_1^*=\\mu_2^*=0$. If the resulting $\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{sum},*}$ and $f_k^{\\mathrm{e},*}$ already satisfy the two resource constraints, the update is completed. Otherwise, $\\mu_1^*$ and $\\mu_2^*$ are obtained by one-dimensional bisection search, with search intervals $0 \\le \\mu_1^* \\le \\frac{\\rho_1}{K}\\max_k\\{(\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}} + \\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}})-\\beta_{1,k}/\\rho_1\\}$ and $0 \\le \\mu_2^* \\le \\frac{\\rho_2}{K}\\max_k\\{\\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e}}-\\beta_{2,k}/\\rho_2\\}$. This yields the global time and computing resource allocation in each ADMM iteration.\n\n\\subsection{Overall Algorithm}\n\nAlgorithm~\\ref{alg:admm} summarizes the overall ADMM-based procedure. In each iteration, each IoT device first solves~\\eqref{eq:subproblem_1} using the above device-side search and update procedure. After that the edge server solves~\\eqref{eq:subproblem_2} using the updates in~\\eqref{eq:tau_k_sum_*} and the associated bisection search. The dual variables are then updated according to~\\eqref{eq:beta_1_update} and~\\eqref{eq:beta_2_update}. The iterations stop when the primal residuals fall below the threshold or the maximum iteration number is reached.\n\n\n\\begin{algorithm}[t]\n\\caption{ADMM-based Algorithm for Solving Problem~\\eqref{eq:obj_fun}.}\n\\label{alg:admm}\n\\DontPrintSemicolon\n\n\\nlnonumber\n\\hspace*{-1em}\\textbf{Initialize:} Set $\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{sum}}$, $f_k^{\\mathrm{e}}$, $\\beta_{1,k}$, $\\beta_{2,k}$, $\\rho_1$, $\\rho_2$, primal residual tolerance $\\varepsilon>0$, current iteration number $i=0$, and maximum iteration number $I_{\\max}$;\\;\n\n\\Repeat{$\\|\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{sum},*}\\!\\!-\\!(\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{s}} F_k^{\\mathrm{s}} \\!+ \\!\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}})\\|_2\\le\\varepsilon$, $\\|f_k^{\\mathrm{e},*}\\!-\\!\\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e}}\\|_2\\!\\le\\!\\varepsilon$, \\textnormal{or} $i\\!>\\!I_{\\max}$}{\n \\% Accuracy maximization at the IoT devices;\\;\n \\For{$k=1,\\ldots,K$}{\n Solve problem~\\eqref{eq:subproblem_1} according to the above device-side procedure and obtain $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$, $\\Delta n_k$, $\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{c}}$, and $\\hat{f}_k^{\\mathrm{e}}$;\\;\n }\n \\% Resource allocation at the edge server;\\;\n Solve problem~\\eqref{eq:subproblem_2} according to the above edge-side update and obtain $\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{sum},*}$ and $f_k^{\\mathrm{e},*}$;\\;\n \n Update $\\beta_{1,k}$ and $\\beta_{2,k}$ according to \\eqref{eq:beta_1_update} and \\eqref{eq:beta_2_update};\\;\n \n $i=i+1$;\\;\n}\n\nOutput the final solution to problem~\\eqref{eq:obj_fun}.\\;\n\\end{algorithm}\n\n\n\n\\section{Evaluation Results}\n\\label{sec:evalation}\n\nIn this section, we evaluate the proposed framework and algorithm through comprehensive experiments.\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.98\\linewidth]{fig_pimrc/single_device.pdf}\n \\vspace{-2.5ex}\n \\caption{Impact of $\\Delta n_k$ selected by the subcarrier similarity function on sensing accuracy, energy consumption, and delay.}\n \\vspace{-2.5ex}\n \\label{fig:single_device}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.23\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{fig_pimrc/Performance_vs_E_max.pdf}\n \\vspace{-4.5ex}\n \\caption{$E_k^{\\max}$ vs. accuracy.}\n \\label{fig:Performance_vs_E_max}\n \\end{minipage}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.23\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{fig_pimrc/Performance_vs_T_max.pdf}\n \\vspace{-4.5ex}\n \\caption{$T_k^{\\max}$ vs. accuracy.}\n \\label{fig:Performance_vs_T_max}\n \\end{minipage}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.22\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{fig_pimrc/Performance_vs_f_e_total.pdf}\n \\vspace{-4.5ex}\n \\caption{$f^{\\mathrm{e}}$ vs. accuracy.}\n \\label{fig:Performance_vs_f_e_total}\n \\end{minipage}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.23\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{fig_pimrc/Performance_vs_p_m_1.pdf}\n \\vspace{-4.5ex}\n \\caption{$p_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{m}}$ vs. accuracy.}\n \\label{fig:Performance_vs_p_m_1}\n \\end{minipage}\n \\vspace{-5ex}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\n\\subsection{Evaluation Setup}\n\\label{sec:eva_set}\nFor evaluation, we use simulation for communication and real experiments for sensing. We consider a BS with an edge server and 12 randomly distributed IoT devices within a coverage radius of 550~\\!m. The communication bandwidth is 20~\\!MHz, with 245 subcarriers. The noise spectral density is -174~\\!dBm/Hz. The communication transmit power, sensing power, and local computation power of each IoT device are set to 24.0~\\!dBm, 20.4~\\!dBm, and 25.4~\\!dBm, respectively. Unless otherwise specified, $E_k^{\\max}=0.03$~\\!J, $T_k^{\\max}=3.4$~\\!s (including $T^{\\mathrm{s}}=3$~\\!s), $p^{\\max}=2~\\!\\%$, $\\eta_k=0.95$, and $f^{\\mathrm{e}}=10$~\\!GHz. For sensing, channel state information (CSI) data are collected in an office using commodity WiFi network interface cards (Intel AX210) under the IEEE 802.11ax standard. In this work, the measured CSI data are used as OFDM sensing data. The carrier frequency is 5~\\!GHz, the bandwidth is 80~\\!MHz, and the sampling rate is 2{,}000~\\!Hz. Ten volunteers perform eight activity types, yielding 9{,}600 CSI time series. For each transmitter--receiver antenna pair, 245 adjacent subcarriers are selected from the measured CSI data to represent the sensing data of one IoT device under a 20~\\!MHz bandwidth. This approximation is adopted because 245 adjacent subcarriers correspond to the subcarrier scale of a 20~\\!MHz OFDM system. Based on these data, we fit $\\lambda_i$, $r_i$, and $\\sigma_\\mathrm{c}^2$, and use a CNN to obtain $\\alpha_k(F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}, \\Delta n_k)$. The probability of the static type is set to 0.1, and each of the other seven types has probability~0.9/7.\n\n\n\\subsection{Validation of the Subcarrier Selection Module}\nBefore evaluating the proposed framework and algorithm, we first validate the proposed subcarrier selection module on a single IoT device. Using the previously collected sensing dataset, we select the data of one IoT device and set $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}=500~\\!$Hz. The results are shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:single_device}, with $\\eta_k=0.95$. As $A_k(\\Delta n_k)$ decreases from one to $\\eta_k$, $\\Delta n_k$ increases accordingly. The sensing accuracy decreases by only 7.3\\%, while the energy consumption and delay are reduced by 63.1\\% and 65.4\\%, respectively. This indicates that the CSI time series across subcarriers contain substantial redundant information, and reducing the number of subcarriers can markedly lower energy consumption and delay with only a minor loss in sensing accuracy. Therefore, the proposed subcarrier selection module is effective in the single-device setting.\n\n\n\\subsection{Performance Comparison}\nTo further evaluate the proposed framework and algorithm, we consider three baselines: 1) \\emph{Conventional scheme}~\\cite{he2024integrated}: no subcarrier selection is applied. 2) \\emph{Fixed $\\Delta n_k$ scheme}: $\\Delta n_k$ is fixed, with $\\Delta n_k \\in \\{5,70\\}$. 3) \\emph{Average resource scheme}: time and edge computing resources are equally allocated among IoT devices, i.e., $(\\tau_k^{\\mathrm{sum}}, f_k^{\\mathrm{e}}) = (1/K,\\, f^{\\mathrm{e}}/K)$.\n\nFirst, we evaluate the impact of different $E_k^{\\max}$ on the four schemes, as shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:Performance_vs_E_max}. As $E_k^{\\max}$ increases, the sensing accuracy of all schemes improves, since a larger energy budget allows a higher $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$ or a smaller $\\Delta n_k$, both of which improve $\\alpha_k(F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}, \\Delta n_k)$. The proposed scheme consistently outperforms the other schemes under different energy budgets, because it can adaptively optimize $\\Delta n_k$ for different IoT devices and allocate resources more efficiently. By contrast, the conventional scheme performs the worst because it offloads complete CSI data and thus supports only a relatively low feasible sampling rate under limited resources. The fixed $\\Delta n_k$ scheme performs better than the conventional one, but remains inferior to the proposed scheme due to its lack of flexibility. In particular, the case $\\Delta n_k=5$ generally outperforms $\\Delta n_k=70$, indicating that an overly large fixed interval may lead to excessive sensing information loss.\n\nFig.~\\ref{fig:Performance_vs_T_max} illustrates the impact of different $T_k^{\\max}$ on the four schemes. Similar to the case with limited energy, the sensing accuracy of all schemes improves as $T_k^{\\max}$ increases, because a looser delay constraint allows a higher $F_k^{\\mathrm{s}}$ or a smaller $\\Delta n_k$. The proposed scheme again consistently achieves the best performance, showing its advantage under different delay budgets. Meanwhile, the performance gains of the conventional scheme and the fixed $\\Delta n_k$ scheme are less significant than those of the proposed scheme and the average resource scheme. This suggests that, under the current evaluation settings, delay is not the primary bottleneck for the conventional and fixed $\\Delta n_k$ schemes.\n\nFig.~\\ref{fig:Performance_vs_f_e_total} shows the impact of the total computation resource $f^{\\mathrm{e}}$ on the four schemes. As $f^{\\mathrm{e}}$ increases, the sensing accuracy of all schemes improves because more edge computing resources reduce the recognition delay and enable more favorable sensing configurations. The proposed scheme consistently outperforms the baselines, further confirming its effectiveness. It is also observed that the performance of all schemes first improves significantly and then gradually saturates as $f^{\\mathrm{e}}$ increases. This is because, once $f^{\\mathrm{e}}$ becomes sufficiently large, edge computing is no longer the dominant factor limiting the sensing accuracy.\n\nFig.~\\ref{fig:Performance_vs_p_m_1} illustrates the impact of the probability of the static type $p_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{m}}$ on the four schemes. As $p_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{m}}$ increases, the sensing accuracy of all schemes improves, and the proposed scheme consistently achieves the best performance. However, the performance gap among the schemes gradually narrows as $p_{k,1}^{\\mathrm{m}}$ increases. This is because the miss rate and false positive rate are constrained to be close to zero, so the static type can be recognized correctly. As a result, when static samples become dominant, the accuracies of all schemes increase and become closer to one another.\n\n\n\\section{Conclusion}\n\\label{sec:con}\n\nIn this paper, we propose a subcarrier selection-based sensing framework for multi-device ISCC systems to reduce sensing overhead by removing frequency-domain redundancy from OFDM sensing data. We establish analytical models for sensing accuracy, delay, and energy consumption, formulate a sensing accuracy maximization problem under practical constraints, and develop an ADMM-based algorithm for joint sensing parameter optimization and resource allocation. Experiment results on commodity wireless devices validate the proposed framework and show that it consistently outperforms three baseline schemes under different resource constraints. This work demonstrates the potential of subcarrier selection for improving sensing efficiency in future ISCC systems.\n\n\n\\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}\n\\bibliography{ref}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: ref.bib\n================================================\n@article{liu2022integrated,\n title={{Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-functional wireless networks for 6G and beyond}},\n author={Liu, Fan and Cui, Yuanhao and Masouros, Christos and Xu, Jie and Han, Tony Xiao and Eldar, Yonina C and Buzzi, Stefano},\n journal={IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.},\n volume={40},\n number={6},\n pages={1728--1767},\n year={2022},\n month={Jun.}\n}\n\n@article{wei2023integrated,\n title={{Integrated sensing and communication signals toward 5G-A and 6G: A survey}},\n author={Wei, Zhiqing and Qu, Hanyang and Wang, Yuan and Yuan, Xin and Wu, Huici and Du, Ying and Han, Kaifeng and Zhang, Ning and Feng, Zhiyong},\n journal={IEEE Internet Things J.},\n volume={10},\n number={13},\n pages={11068--11092},\n year ={2023},\n month={Jul.},\n}\n\n@article{ye2026practical,\n title={{Practical WiFi indoor localization: Unleashing the potential of GNNs for accuracy and robustness}},\n author={Ye, Ziqi and Xiao, Qiqi and Liu, Jianwei and He, Yinghui and Yu, Guanding and Han, Jinsong},\n journal={IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput.},\n year={2026},\n volume={25},\n number={5},\n pages={7131-7148},\n month={May}\n}\n\n@article{zhang2025intelligent,\n title={{Intelligent integrated sensing and communication: A survey}},\n author={Zhang, Jifa and Lu, Weidang and Xing, Chengwen and Zhao, Nan and Al-Dhahir, Naofal and Karagiannidis, George K and Yang, Xiaoniu},\n journal={Sci. China Inf. Sci.},\n volume={68},\n number={3},\n pages={131301},\n year={2025},\n month={Dec.}\n}\n\n@article{he2025task,\n title={Task-Oriented Integrated Sensing and Semantic Communications for Multi-Device Video Analytics},\n author={He, Yinghui and Li, Xin and Luo, Jun},\n journal={IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput.},\n volume={25},\n number={5},\n pages={7323--7337},\n year={2026},\n month={May}\n}\n\n@article{wen2023taskair,\n title={{Task-oriented over-the-air computation for multi-device edge AI}},\n author={Wen, Dingzhu and Jiao, Xiang and Liu, Peixi and Zhu, Guangxu and Shi, Yuanming and Huang, Kaibin},\n journal={IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.},\n volume={23},\n number={3},\n pages={2039--2053},\n year={2024},\n month={Mar.}\n}\n\n@article{yang2020federated,\n title={{Federated learning via over-the-air computation}},\n author={Yang, Kai and Jiang, Tao and Shi, Yuanming and Ding, Zhi},\n journal={IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.},\n volume={19},\n number={3},\n pages={2022--2035},\n year={2020},\n month={Mar.}\n}\n\n@article{wen2024survey,\n title={{A survey on integrated sensing, communication, and computation}},\n author={Wen, Dingzhu and Zhou, Yong and Li, Xiaoyang and Shi, Yuanming and Huang, Kaibin and Letaief, Khaled B},\n journal={IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts.},\n volume={27},\n number={5},\n pages={3058-3098},\n year={2024},\n month={Oct.}\n}\n\n@article{li2022joint,\n title={{Joint sensing, communication, and computation in mobile crowdsensing enabled edge networks}},\n author={Li, Xiaoqian and Feng, Gang and Liu, Yijing and Qin, Shuang and Zhang, Zhongpei},\n journal={IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.},\n volume={22},\n number={4},\n pages={2818--2832},\n year={2023},\n month={Apr.}\n}\n\n@article{he2024integrated,\n title={{Integrated sensing, computation, and communication: System framework and performance optimization}}, \n author={He, Yinghui and Yu, Guanding and Cai, Yunlong and Luo, Haiyan},\n journal={IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.}, \n year={2024},\n volume={23},\n number={2},\n pages={1114-1128},\n month={Feb.}\n}\n\n@article{chen2025sensing,\n title={{Sensing framework design and performance optimization with action detection for ISCC}},\n author={Chen, Weiwei and He, Yinghui and Yu, Guanding and Wang, Jianfeng and Luo, Haiyan},\n journal={IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.},\n year={2025},\n volume={24},\n number={10},\n pages={8361-8375},\n month={Oct.}\n}\n\n@article{wang2019global,\n title={{Global convergence of ADMM in nonconvex nonsmooth optimization}},\n author={Wang, Yu and Yin, Wotao and Zeng, Jinshan},\n journal={J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={78},\n number={1},\n pages={29--63},\n year={2019},\n month={Jan.}\n}\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091163,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31963"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31963"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"John Sweeney"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"John Sweeney"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Signed-Permutation Coordinate Transport for RMSNorm Transformers"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"31 pages, 2 figures, 26 tables"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.LG cs.CL stat.ML"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Modern LLM workflows move coordinate-indexed objects across checkpoints: steering vectors, sparse autoencoders, top-$k$ neuron sets, attribution lists, and merge alignments. This is only well posed after fixing the model's residual-stream gauge, which we show is architecture-dependent: LayerNorm residual charts have permutation gauge $S_d$ (up to a global sign flip), while RMSNorm charts with generic per-channel gain have signed-permutation gauge $B_d = S_d \\ltimes \\{\\pm 1\\}^d$. Permutation-only alignment is therefore symmetry-incomplete for RMSNorm models. We introduce sign-marginalized Hungarian matching and prove a sharp failure mode: with decorrelated coordinates, raw signed-correlation matching has a structural permutation-accuracy ceiling at the positive-sign fraction of the true gauge, which sign-marginalization removes. We then make coordinate-preserving transport, not function-level merging, the primary object: composing saved-checkpoint local $B_d$ gauges along same-base fine-tuning trajectories recovers 91.1% of cross-run coordinates at 1500 steps versus 60.3% for endpoint matching, and the gain is not explained by merely routing through the base. The recovered gauge transfers tools that permutation-only alignment breaks: TinyLlama SAE reconstruction has NMSE 0.004 under $B_d$ versus 1.08 under $S_d$; Qwen sentiment steering preserves 95.8% of its effect versus 17.2%; refusal steering reverses sign under $S_d$; coordinate-preserving merges behave the same way. The same covariance governs stateful training: signed transport of AdamW state preserves the resumed trajectory, while permutation-only state follows a different one from a functionally identical checkpoint. Finally, gauge-sweep audits show index-level interpretability claims are reproducible only relative to an explicit gauge."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:02:33 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:02:33 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Sweeney","John",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Sweeney\",\n \"John\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass{article}\n\n% Official NeurIPS 2026 style. Use preprint for arXiv/non-anonymous public drafts.\n\\usepackage[preprint]{neurips_2026}\n\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}\n\\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\usepackage{url}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{amsfonts}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{amssymb}\n\\usepackage{amsthm}\n\\usepackage{mathtools}\n\\usepackage{microtype}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{subcaption}\n\\usepackage{array}\n\\usepackage{makecell}\n\n% arXiv polish: clean hyperlinks (no draft boxes), Type-1 monospace (avoid Type-3 bitmaps), PDF metadata.\n\\renewcommand{\\ttdefault}{lmtt}\n\\hypersetup{hidelinks, pdftitle={Signed-Permutation Coordinate Transport for RMSNorm Transformers}, pdfauthor={John Sweeney}}\n\n\\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]\n\\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}\n\\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}\n\\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}\n\\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}\n\\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}\n\n\\newcommand{\\R}{\\mathbb{R}}\n\\newcommand{\\Sd}{S_d}\n\\newcommand{\\Bd}{B_d}\n\\newcommand{\\G}{\\mathcal{G}}\n\\newcommand{\\norm}[1]{\\left\\lVert #1 \\right\\rVert}\n\\newcommand{\\inner}[2]{\\left\\langle #1,#2 \\right\\rangle}\n\\newcommand{\\diag}{\\operatorname{diag}}\n\\newcommand{\\tr}{\\operatorname{tr}}\n\\newcommand{\\argmax}{\\operatorname*{arg\\,max}}\n\\newcommand{\\argmin}{\\operatorname*{arg\\,min}}\n\\newcommand{\\RMS}{\\operatorname{RMS}}\n\\newcommand{\\RMSNorm}{\\operatorname{RMSNorm}}\n\\newcommand{\\LayerNorm}{\\operatorname{LayerNorm}}\n\\newcommand{\\CKA}{\\operatorname{CKA}}\n\n\\title{Signed-Permutation Coordinate Transport for RMSNorm Transformers}\n\n\\author{%\n John Sweeney\\\\\n Sideplane AI\\\\\n \\texttt{john.sweeney@sideplane.ai}\\\\\n \\url{https://sideplane.ai}\\\\\n}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\\begin{abstract}\nModern LLM workflows increasingly move coordinate-indexed objects across checkpoints: steering vectors, sparse autoencoders, top-$k$ neuron sets, attribution lists, and merge alignments. This is only well posed after fixing the model's residual-stream gauge. We show that the native discrete gauge is architecture-dependent: LayerNorm residual charts have permutation gauge $\\Sd$, up to a global sign flip, while RMSNorm residual charts with generic per-channel gain have signed-permutation gauge $\\Bd=\\Sd\\ltimes\\{\\pm1\\}^d$. Thus permutation-only alignment is symmetry-incomplete for RMSNorm models. We introduce sign-marginalized Hungarian matching and prove a sharp population failure mode: with decorrelated source coordinates, raw signed-correlation matching has a structural permutation-accuracy ceiling equal to the fraction of positive signs in the true gauge up to $O(d2^{-d})$, whereas sign-marginalized matching removes this obstruction. We then make coordinate-preserving transport, rather than function-level merging, the primary object: composing saved-checkpoint local $\\Bd$ gauges along same-base fine-tuning trajectories recovers 91.1\\% of cross-run coordinates at 1500 steps versus 60.3\\% for endpoint matching, and the gain is not explained by merely routing through the base. The recovered gauge transfers tools that permutation-only alignment breaks: TinyLlama SAE reconstruction has NMSE 0.004 under $\\Bd$ recovery versus 1.08 under $\\Sd$; Qwen sentiment steering preserves 95.8\\% of its effect versus 17.2\\%; refusal steering reverses sign under $\\Sd$. Coordinate-preserving merge tests show the same mechanism. The same covariance governs stateful training: signed transport of AdamW state preserves the resumed trajectory, while permutation-only state transport starts from a functionally identical checkpoint but follows a different trajectory. Finally, we give gauge-sweep audits for index-level interpretability claims: coordinate names are reproducible only relative to an explicit gauge.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\\section{Introduction}\n\\label{sec:intro}\n\nThe question ``which neuron is this?'' is ill-posed without a gauge specification. If a residual coordinate of a transformer is relabeled, the input-output function is unchanged but every index-level object attached to that coordinate moves with the relabeling. This is not merely philosophical: modern workflows publish coordinate-indexed artifacts--ranked neuron or attribution sets, knowledge-neuron edits, SAE dictionaries, steering directions, LoRA updates, and merge alignments. A coordinate-indexed claim should therefore pass a simple audit: exact gauges should preserve behavior, move raw coordinate names, and restore agreement after mapping back.\n\nStandard alignment tools such as Git Re-Basin and weight matching search over permutations [Ainsworth et al., 2023, Entezari et al., 2022]. That is correct for LayerNorm residual streams, but widely used open-weight LLMs such as Llama 2 and Qwen2.5 use RMSNorm [Touvron et al., 2023, Yang et al., 2024a, Zhang and Sennrich, 2019]. RMSNorm lacks mean-centering. Its residual stream therefore admits not only permutations but independent sign flips of every coordinate. The relevant discrete group is the hyperoctahedral group $\\Bd$ of order $2^d d!$, not $\\Sd$ of order $d!$. In a 4096-dimensional residual stream, the omitted sign component fixes only one of $2^{4096}$ gauge cosets and forgoes 4096 binary degrees of freedom; Corollary~\\ref{cor:sign-omission} shows that mis-applying it to a learned weight update introduces squared error of magnitude $2\\norm{\\Delta W}_F^2$ in expectation, the same order as the update's own energy. Many analyses are already gauge-invariant; our target is workflows that explicitly move or publish coordinate-indexed artifacts.\n\nThis paper is about the consequences of using the right group. We first prove that LayerNorm has $\\Sd$, up to a global sign flip, while RMSNorm has full signed-permutation gauge $\\Bd$ for generic gain $\\gamma$, and that $\\Bd$ is the maximal coordinate-preserving subgroup of $O(d)$ in the native $\\gamma$-explicit parameterization. Broader orthogonal freedom returns only after absorbing $\\gamma$ into adjacent weights; this is useful for compression or dense fusion, but it changes the coordinate system and does not preserve sparse coordinate identity.\n\nWe then recover the gauge from activations. The natural algorithm is the activation-matching linear assignment used by earlier neuron-alignment and Git Re-Basin work [Li et al., 2016, Tatro et al., 2020, Ainsworth et al., 2023], solved by Hungarian-style assignment methods [Kuhn, 1955], except that the cost must marginalize over sign: match columns by $|\\inner{h_i}{h'_j}|$, then recover the sign from the matched correlation. The absolute value is required by the $\\Bd$ symmetry: under a negative gauge sign, the correct coordinate is maximally anti-correlated. We prove this ceiling in the decorrelated-coordinate population case: when half the true signs are negative, the correct entries for those coordinates are the most negative entries in their rows, so signed-correlation maximization avoids them even with unlimited probes. Recorded-gauge LLM activations show the same obstruction: signed-cost recovery stays near 50\\%, while sign-marginalized recovery reaches 100\\%.\n\nThe constructive payoff is \\emph{transport} when an atlas exists. Instead of matching only two endpoints, we compose saved-checkpoint local $\\Bd$ gauges along a training trajectory. On a gauge-instrumented Qwen2.5-1.5B fine-tuning benchmark (1500 steps, with a randomly sampled $\\Bd$ gauge applied at step 0 and its induced correspondence recorded as ground truth), endpoint matching recovers 60.3\\% of coordinates while transport-via-base recovers 91.1\\%; endpoint-via-base recovers only 11.4\\%, so the improvement is not a base-reference artifact but comes from many small, high-margin local gauges. The result is $\\Bd$-specific: $\\Sd$-only transport drops signs and reverses transferred tools; continuous-rotation atlases preserve function but lose coordinate identity (Theorem~\\ref{thm:discrete-content}); only $\\Bd$ preserves both, so steering vectors and adapters transfer cleanly under $\\Bd$ recovery.\n\nThe same sign failure mode appears in coordinate-preserving merge tests. In a Llama-2-7B gauge-scramble merge, signed alignment eliminates the peak-above-chord barrier ($6.14\\to0.00$), while exact permutation-only alignment is actively harmful. In independently trained 10M-parameter RMSNorm transformers, sign mismatch appears between seeds without an external basis change, and signed alignment improves the barrier from 0.66 to 0.42 over permutation-only. These merge results are scoped to the coordinate-preserving regime: when coordinate identity is the object, RMSNorm alignment must include signs. The same gauge covariance governs AdamW optimizer state: signed transport preserves the resumed training trajectory, while permutation-only state diverges despite starting from a functionally identical checkpoint.\n\nFinally, we use gauge sweeps as a falsifiable negative control for coordinate-indexed interpretability. Coordinates are not always the right units; directions, subspaces, CKA, and behavior-level interventions are often better and already gauge-invariant [Raghu et al., 2017, Morcos et al., 2018, Kornblith et al., 2019]. But the field still produces coordinate-indexed artifacts--knowledge neurons, top-$k$ steering coordinates, SAE feature dictionaries, sparse ablation sets--and these are reproducible only relative to a gauge. Cross-run reproducibility for such claims requires a gauge anchor (e.g., a same-base atlas), $\\Bd$-correct READ/WRITE rules for any artifact crossing parameterizations, and the audit as a negative control: under an exact random gauge, raw indices should move, mapped indices should agree, and behavior should remain fixed.\n\n\\section{Native residual-stream gauge}\n\\label{sec:gauge}\n\nWe use row-vector notation. A residual activation matrix $H\\in\\R^{n\\times d}$ is gauged by right multiplication $H\\mapsto HG$. A signed permutation $G\\in\\Bd$ has exactly one nonzero entry, $\\pm1$, in each row and column. A permutation is the special case with all signs $+1$. We use ``gauge'' in the reparameterization sense: a choice of coordinates within a function-preserving symmetry orbit. In this paper the relevant group is the global discrete signed-permutation action $\\Bd$ on residual coordinates.\n\n\\begin{theorem}[Maximal native discrete gauge]\n\\label{thm:native-gauge}\nConsider a transformer with residual dimension $d$, tokenwise LayerNorm or RMSNorm, standard affine projections $Y=XW^\\top+b$, and attention/MLP sublayers that interact with residual coordinates only through linear maps, elementwise nonlinearities, and the normalization. Then the following groups act by function-preserving residual-coordinate relabelings:\n\\[\n\\G =\n\\begin{cases}\n\\{\\pm P:P\\in \\Sd\\}\\cong \\Sd\\times C_2, & \\text{LayerNorm},\\\\\n\\Bd, & \\text{RMSNorm with generic per-channel gain }\\gamma.\n\\end{cases}\n\\]\nFor LayerNorm, the $C_2$ factor is one global sign flip with $\\beta\\mapsto-\\beta$, so the per-index content is still $\\Sd$. Moreover, for generic RMSNorm $\\gamma$, $\\Bd$ is the maximal subgroup of $O(d)$ that preserves native coordinate identity without absorbing $\\gamma$ into adjacent weights. Repeated $\\gamma$ values can add rotations inside common equal-$\\gamma$ subspaces across RMSNorms sharing the residual chart; if any relevant gain vector is generic, the native orthogonal gauge reduces to $\\Bd$.\n\\end{theorem}\n\n\\paragraph{Proof sketch.}\nLinear maps admit any orthogonal residual gauge under READ/WRITE weight transforms. A READ map uses $W^G=WG$, giving $HG(W^G)^\\top=HW^\\top$; a WRITE map uses $W^G=G^\\top W$, $b^G=bG$, giving $(XW^\\top+b)G$. $Q,K,V$ projections are invariant; only the output projection writes the gauged contribution. Normalization restricts $G$. RMSNorm is norm-invariant, but its diagonal gain requires $G^\\top\\diag(\\gamma)G$ to remain diagonal; for generic $\\gamma$, the orthogonal solutions are exactly signed permutations. LayerNorm is permutation-invariant but excludes independent coordinate signs; the remaining signed elements are $-P$, with $\\beta\\mapsto-\\beta P$ (Lemma~\\ref{lem:layernorm}). Full module rules and induction over blocks are in Appendices~\\ref{app:proof-gauge} and~\\ref{app:rules}.\n\nThe native-vs.-absorbed distinction is the main boundary with recent orthogonal methods. SliceGPT and QuaRot exploit the identity $\\RMSNorm(XQ)Q^\\top=\\RMSNorm(X)$ after moving gains into neighboring matrices [Ashkboos et al., 2024a,b]; generalized linear mode connectivity and rotation-based fusion use related $O(d)$ structure [Theus et al., 2025, Zhang et al., 2025]. These methods are complementary. They are appropriate when a dense rotated basis is acceptable. Transporting a top-$k$ coordinate set, an SAE dictionary attached to residual coordinates, an AdamW diagonal state, or an index-level claim requires the native coordinate-preserving subgroup, which is $\\Bd$ (Proposition~\\ref{prop:sparse} and Remark~\\ref{rem:adamw}).\n\n\\begin{theorem}[Discrete content of an orthogonal map]\n\\label{thm:discrete-content}\nFor any $Q\\in O(d)$, define\n\\[\nP^\\star = \\argmin_{P\\in\\Bd}\\norm{Q-P}_F .\n\\]\nGenerically (outside a Lebesgue-null set of $Q$ where Hungarian ties or matched zeros occur), $P^\\star$ is obtained by Hungarian assignment on $|Q|$: choose\n\\[\n\\sigma^\\star = \\argmax_{\\sigma\\in\\Sd}\\sum_j |Q_{\\sigma(j),j}|,\n\\]\nthen set the sign of column $j$ to $\\operatorname{sign}(Q_{\\sigma^\\star(j),j})$. The residual $R=Q(P^\\star)^{-1}\\in O(d)$ captures continuous drift, and $\\rho(Q)=d^{-1}\\tr(Q^\\top P^\\star)$ equals one iff $Q\\in\\Bd$.\n\\end{theorem}\n\nTheorem~\\ref{thm:discrete-content} separates the two alignment objects. The $\\Bd$ component is a discrete scaffold that preserves coordinate identity; the residual $R$ is a dense basis change. In limited-data settings this matters: estimating an arbitrary dense $R$ requires paired activation information at scale, while the discrete component of a known orthogonal map is recovered from $|Q|$ alone. Proof is in Appendix~\\ref{app:decomp}.\n\n\\begin{proposition}[Gauge-covariance of learned weight updates]\n\\label{prop:update-covariance}\nLet $\\theta$ be a transformer parameterization satisfying the assumptions of Theorem~\\ref{thm:native-gauge}, and let $G\\in\\G$ be an admissible discrete gauge. Write $T_G$ for the modulewise READ/WRITE/RMSNorm transform of Theorem~\\ref{thm:native-gauge} acting on weights. Then $T_G$ is linear: for any weight delta $\\Delta\\theta$ on the same parameter set, however produced,\n\\[\nT_G(\\theta+\\Delta\\theta)=T_G(\\theta)+T_G^{\\mathrm{lin}}(\\Delta\\theta),\n\\]\nwhere $T_G^{\\mathrm{lin}}$ applies the same modulewise READ/WRITE rules to $\\Delta\\theta$ as a free linear map. In particular, for a low-rank LoRA factor $\\Delta W=BA$ on a residual-stream projection,\n\\[\n\\text{READ: } A^G=AG,\\;B^G=B;\\qquad\n\\text{WRITE: } A^G=A,\\;B^G=G^\\top B.\n\\]\n\\end{proposition}\n\n\\begin{corollary}[Sign-omission destroys learned updates]\n\\label{cor:sign-omission}\nFor an update $\\Delta W$ on a coordinate-indexed module under RMSNorm gauge $G=PS$ with permutation $P$ and signs $S=\\diag(s)$, $s_j\\in\\{\\pm1\\}$, the squared Frobenius update error of $\\Sd$-only transport (correct permutation, signs forced to $+1$) is\n\\[\n\\norm{\\Delta WPS-\\Delta WP}_F^2\n=4\\sum_{j:s_j=-1}\\norm{\\Delta W_{:,P^{-1}(j)}}_2^2,\n\\qquad\n\\mathbb{E}_S[\\cdot]=2\\norm{\\Delta W}_F^2.\n\\]\nFor random signs, the expected error equals twice the update's own energy.\n\\end{corollary}\n\n\\paragraph{Empirical confirmation.}\nIn our Qwen2.5-1.5B SST-2 LoRA experiment (Table~\\ref{tab:artifact-covariance}), $\\Sd$-perm-only transport gives accuracy 0.523 versus the unadapted base 0.525--i.e., a $-0.5\\%$ adapter-gain preservation, consistent with the sign-omission collapse predicted by Corollary~\\ref{cor:sign-omission}. The signed transport recovers 0.944, matching the source adapter (0.945) and the upper-bound reference (0.944).\n\n\\begin{lemma}[Artifact orientation]\n\\label{lem:artifact-orientation}\nLet $G=P\\diag(s)\\in\\Bd$ with $s\\in\\{\\pm1\\}^d$. For any residual-aligned vector artifact $v\\in\\R^d$--a steering vector, cached activation, linear-probe direction, SAE encoder row, or LoRA READ-side row--the correct $\\Bd$ transport is $vG$, while permutation-only ($\\Sd$) transport is $vP$ (WRITE-side matrices and SAE decoder columns transform via $G^\\top$; see Table~\\ref{tab:transport-rules}). These satisfy\n\\[\n\\norm{vG-vP}_2^2\n=4\\sum_{j:s_j=-1}(vP)_j^2,\\qquad\n\\cos\\angle(vG,vP)=\n\\frac{\\sum_j s_j(vP)_j^2}{\\sum_j(vP)_j^2}.\n\\]\nFor balanced signs and a $vP$ not concentrated on a few coordinates, the cosine is near zero: $\\Sd$ preserves the support of $v$ but loses its orientation.\n\\end{lemma}\n\nLemma~\\ref{lem:artifact-orientation} is the vector specialization of Corollary~\\ref{cor:sign-omission} and unifies all $\\Bd$-specific tool-transfer outcomes in this paper: each artifact in Table~\\ref{tab:transport-rules} has a coordinate-indexed orientation that $\\Sd$ alignment cannot represent, and each gauge-covariance row in Table~\\ref{tab:artifact-covariance} is one instance of the same orientation law.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{$\\Bd$ transport rules for coordinate-indexed artifacts. $G\\in\\Bd$ acts on residual coordinates from the right ($H\\mapsto HG$); READ matrices read from the residual, WRITE matrices write into it. In every row, $\\Sd$ preserves the artifact's support but loses orientation by Lemma~\\ref{lem:artifact-orientation}.}\n\\label{tab:transport-rules}\n\\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{lll}\n\\toprule\nArtifact & Correct $\\Bd$ transport & What $\\Sd$ misses\\\\\n\\midrule\nSteering vector $v$ & $v\\mapsto vG$ & sign orientation\\\\\nCached residual/patch $h$ & $h\\mapsto hG$ & cached-state orientation\\\\\nLinear probe direction $w$ & $w\\mapsto wG$ & decision-boundary orientation\\\\\nSAE encoder $W_{\\rm enc}$ & $W_{\\rm enc}\\mapsto W_{\\rm enc}G$ & feature-read orientation\\\\\nSAE decoder $W_{\\rm dec}$ & $W_{\\rm dec}\\mapsto G^\\top W_{\\rm dec}$ & reconstruction orientation\\\\\nLoRA READ $\\Delta W=BA$ & $A\\mapsto AG,\\;B\\mapsto B$ & input-basis signs\\\\\nLoRA WRITE $\\Delta W=BA$ & $A\\mapsto A,\\;B\\mapsto G^\\top B$ & output-basis signs\\\\\nAdamW/SGDm first moment $m_W$ & $m_W$ transforms with $W$ (per role) & first-moment orientation\\\\\nAdamW second moment $v_W$ & $v_W\\mapsto T_{|G|}(v_W)$ (perm only; signs square out) & none---$v$ is sign-blind by construction\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}%\n}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\paragraph{Gauge-invariance validation.}\nWe verify Theorem~\\ref{thm:native-gauge} by applying random gauges and measuring max logit deviation on held-out prompts or images. LayerNorm models pass permutation gauges and fail independent sign-flip gauges; RMSNorm/T5LayerNorm models pass full signed gauges. Biases must transform as WRITE vectors. Table~\\ref{tab:gauge-validation} reports cross-architecture checks; Figure~\\ref{fig:symmetry-boundary} in the appendix gives the corresponding off-group validation cases.\n\nThe audit does not invalidate the behavior-level conclusions of these analyses. It separates invariant claims from coordinate claims: the refusal direction still changes refusal behavior, and the steering vectors still steer, but the coordinate names attached to those objects are not invariant artifacts until a gauge is specified.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Gauge invariance validation. Errors on the order of $10^{-4}$ are numerical tolerance.}\n\\label{tab:gauge-validation}\n\\begin{tabular}{llll}\n\\toprule\nModel & Norm & Gauge & Max logit error\\\\\n\\midrule\nQwen2.5-7B & RMSNorm & $\\Bd$ & $1.1\\times10^{-4}$\\\\\nLlama-3.1-8B & RMSNorm & $\\Bd$ & $3.0\\times10^{-5}$\\\\\nTinyLlama-1.1B & RMSNorm & $\\Bd$ & $8.6\\times10^{-5}$\\\\\nBERT-base & LayerNorm & $\\Sd$ & $2.3\\times10^{-5}$\\\\\nT5-small & T5LayerNorm & $\\Bd$ & $7.6\\times10^{-5}$\\\\\nViT-B/16 & LayerNorm & $\\Sd$ & $4.3\\times10^{-6}$\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\section{Sign-marginalized gauge recovery}\n\\label{sec:recovery}\n\nGiven paired probe activations $H_s,H_t\\in\\R^{n\\times d}$, we want a recovery action matrix $G\\in\\Bd$ such that $H_tG\\approx H_s$. Center columns and set $C=H_s^\\top H_t$. For a correspondence $\\pi$ and signs $s_i$, minimizing\n\\[\n\\sum_i \\norm{H_s[:,i]-s_iH_t[:,\\pi(i)]}_2^2\n\\]\nis equivalent to maximizing $\\sum_i s_i C_{i,\\pi(i)}$. For fixed $\\pi$, the optimal sign is $s_i=\\operatorname{sign}(C_{i,\\pi(i)})$, so the problem reduces to\n\\[\n\\pi^\\star=\\argmax_{\\pi\\in\\Sd}\\sum_i |C_{i,\\pi(i)}|,\n\\qquad\ns_i^\\star=\\operatorname{sign}(C_{i,\\pi^\\star(i)}).\n\\]\nThis is a standard linear assignment on $-|C|$. We solve it with SciPy's \\texttt{linear\\_sum\\_assignment} routine, a modified Jonker-Volgenant implementation; the assignment problem and shortest-augmenting-path algorithms are classical [Kuhn, 1955, Jonker and Volgenant, 1987, Crouse, 2016, Virtanen et al., 2020].\n\n\\paragraph{Permutation/sign convention.}\nWrite $P_\\pi$ for the row-action permutation with $(P_\\pi)_{i,\\pi(i)}=1$, so $(hP_\\pi)_{\\pi(i)}=h_i$. Matching returns source-indexed signs $s_i=\\operatorname{sign}(C_{i,\\pi(i)})$ and $S_s=\\diag(s_i)$. The forward gauge is $G_{\\rm fwd}=S_sP_\\pi$, so $H_t\\approx H_sG_{\\rm fwd}$; the recovery action is $G_{\\rm rec}=P_\\pi^\\top S_s=G_{\\rm fwd}^{-1}$, so $H_tG_{\\rm rec}\\approx H_s$. Equivalently, with target-indexed $S_t=P_\\pi^\\top S_sP_\\pi$, $G_{\\rm fwd}=P_\\pi S_t$; later formulas writing $G=P\\diag(s)$ use target-indexed signs. This section reports recovery matrices; Section~\\ref{sec:transport} switches to forward-direction subscripts.\n\n\\begin{theorem}[Structural ceiling in the decorrelated-coordinate case]\n\\label{thm:ceiling}\nSuppose two activation matrices are related by a true signed permutation $(\\pi^\\star,s^\\star)$, and source coordinates are uncorrelated with positive variances. Let\n\\[\n\\hat\\pi_{\\rm signed}=\\argmax_\\pi\\sum_i C_{i,\\pi(i)},\\qquad\n\\hat\\pi_{\\rm abs}=\\argmax_\\pi\\sum_i |C_{i,\\pi(i)}|.\n\\]\nAs $N\\to\\infty$, $\\hat\\pi_{\\rm signed}$'s accuracy equals the positive-sign fraction except in the one-negative-sign case; under iid signs its expectation is $1/2+O(d2^{-d})$. The sign-marginalized estimator $\\hat\\pi_{\\rm abs}$ converges to the true permutation under the assignment-margin condition of Lemma~\\ref{lem:assignment-margin}.\n\\end{theorem}\n\nThe theorem explains why permutation-only RMSNorm alignment can fail even with unlimited probes. If the true sign is negative, the correct entry is the row's most negative correlation; signed-correlation matching is designed to avoid it. Correlated residual coordinates can change the exact ceiling, but not the sign-marginalization requirement: under a negative gauge sign, the true coordinate is anti-correlated with its source coordinate, so signed-correlation matching is optimizing the wrong objective.\n\nIn recovery experiments where a recorded $\\Bd$ basis change provides the target correspondence, naive Hungarian on signed cost recovers only 49.4\\%--49.9\\% of the permutation and about 50.1\\% of signs on 7B/8B RMSNorm models, matching the predicted sign obstruction; sign-marginalized matching recovers 100\\% on the same rows (Table~\\ref{tab:signed-vs-abs}). The same recovery succeeds with as few as 22 probe tokens on TinyLlama (Appendix~\\ref{app:probe}). Gradient-times-activation attribution is also restored: signs cancel in $(hG)\\odot((\\nabla_h L)G)=(h\\odot\\nabla_h L)P$, so the recovered permutation maps top-$k$ attribution indices back exactly.\n\n\\paragraph{Probe-budget regimes.}\nThe experiments use three regimes, summarized in Table~\\ref{tab:probe-regimes}: settings with a recorded gauge correspondence are probe-robust; same-base fine-tuning trajectory transport works with small local probes because consecutive checkpoints have high assignment margins; natural alignment between independently trained or differently trained models is probe-hungry and is reported as stability against a large-probe reference rather than as exact accuracy.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Probe budget by result family. The $\\sim$500-token protocol is the default unless a larger natural-alignment run is explicitly stated.}\n\\label{tab:probe-regimes}\n\\begin{tabular}{lll}\n\\toprule\nResult family & Probe budget & Setting\\\\\n\\midrule\nGauge-instrumented recovery & 22--500 tokens & known reference basis\\\\\nGauge-scramble merge & $\\sim$500 tokens & basis change + 50-step fine-tune\\\\\nTransport trajectory recovery & $\\sim$500 tokens/local match & same-base fine-tunes\\\\\nQwen $\\Bd$ vs. $\\Sd$ steering & $\\sim$500 tokens & same-base fine-tunes\\\\\nTinyLlama SAE/steering transfer & 11,134 tokens & basis-change tool transfer\\\\\nIndependent-seed RMSNorm merge & $\\sim$500 tokens & same data, different seeds\\\\\nNatural cross-model stability & $\\sim$36K tokens (saturated) & no reference basis\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\section{Parallel transport and tool transfer}\n\\label{sec:transport}\n\nEndpoint matching estimates one gauge; transport composes many local ones. For a trajectory $t_0,t_1,\\ldots,t_T$, estimate $G_{t_k\\to t_{k+1}}$ by sign-marginalized matching with $H_{t_k}G_{t_k\\to t_{k+1}}\\approx H_{t_{k+1}}$, then set\n\\[\nG_{0\\to T}=G_{t_0\\to t_1}G_{t_1\\to t_2}\\cdots G_{t_{T-1}\\to t_T}.\n\\]\nWithin this section we use the forward-direction subscript $G_{a\\to b}$ with $H_aG_{a\\to b}\\approx H_b$; the recovery action of Section~\\ref{sec:recovery} is its transpose. For two runs $a,b$ with a shared base, compose through the base:\n\\[\n\\hat G_{a\\to b}=\\left(G^{(a)}_{0\\to T}\\right)^{-1}G^{(b)}_{0\\to T}.\n\\]\nIf each local match is correct, the $\\Bd$ product is exact.\n\nWe evaluate on a gauge-instrumented Qwen2.5-1.5B fine-tuning benchmark built from real 1500-step trajectories. A randomly sampled $\\Bd$ gauge is applied at step 0, and its induced coordinate correspondence is recorded as ground truth; subsequent checkpoints come from real fine-tuning updates. Checkpoints are spaced every two optimizer steps, so a 1500-step base-to-final map composes 750 local matches; a cross-run transport-via-base map composes two such chains with the same fixed probe set reused on every edge. At 1500 steps, transport-via-base recovers $91.1\\%\\pm8.7\\%$ of residual coordinates across 18 run pairs, versus $60.3\\%\\pm32.6\\%$ for direct endpoint matching (Table~\\ref{tab:cross-run}). The cross-seed subset is hardest: endpoint matching falls to 43.9\\%, while transport recovers 91.0\\%. Cross-dataset pairs are easier for endpoint matching because the seed is shared, but transport still improves the mean.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Cross-run residual-stream recovery on Qwen2.5-1.5B. Numbers are permutation recovery percentages, mean $\\pm$ s.d.; combined permutation+sign accuracy differs by at most 0.13\\%. Transport composes local $\\Bd$ gauges along the trajectory; endpoint is one final-to-final match. Both methods use the same probe set for each estimated edge; transport uses more saved checkpoints, so this is a low-probe local-composition test rather than an equal-total-query comparison.}\n\\label{tab:cross-run}\n\\begin{tabular}{lrrrr}\n\\toprule\n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{200 steps} & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{1500 steps}\\\\\nPair type & Endpoint & Transport & Endpoint & Transport\\\\\n\\midrule\nCross-seed (9 pairs) & $31.7\\pm13.3$ & $96.2\\pm6.6$ & $43.9\\pm18.6$ & $91.0\\pm8.4$\\\\\nCross-dataset (9 pairs) & $90.9\\pm15.7$ & $96.2\\pm6.4$ & $76.8\\pm36.1$ & $91.2\\pm9.6$\\\\\nOverall (18 pairs) & $61.3\\pm33.6$ & $96.2\\pm6.3$ & $60.3\\pm32.6$ & $91.1\\pm8.7$\\\\\n\\midrule\nEndpoint-via-base & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{$17.1\\pm6.0$} & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{$11.4\\pm3.6$}\\\\\nHybrid via base & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{$37.6\\pm11.1$} & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{$26.7\\pm6.0$}\\\\\nTransport-via-base & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{$96.2\\pm6.3$} & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{$91.1\\pm8.7$}\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\nPer-pair results show consistently positive cross-seed gains, while cross-dataset pairs can favor endpoint matching when endpoint matching is already near-ceiling (Figure~\\ref{fig:transport-advantage}). The lower panel answers a key ablation: the transport gain is not obtained by simply referencing the base. Composing two endpoint maps through the base gives 11.4\\% at 1500 steps, worse than direct endpoint matching. The improvement appears only when both base-to-final maps are themselves transported by local composition. Additional Llama-3.2-1B and FFN results are in Appendix~\\ref{app:transport-details}; FFN transport is less stable over long horizons, which we discuss as a limitation.\n\nTwo facts pin down why same-base trajectories are the natural setting.\n\n\\begin{proposition}[No canonical function-level transport between independent endpoints]\n\\label{prop:no-canonical}\nLet $\\G$ be a nontrivial gauge group acting on parameter space $\\Theta$ with $\\theta\\sim\\theta'$ iff $f(\\cdot;\\theta)=f(\\cdot;\\theta')$. No map $A:\\Theta\\times\\Theta\\to\\G$ can simultaneously satisfy (i) function-level factoring, $A(\\theta_1,\\theta_2)=A(\\theta_1,\\theta_2H)$ for all $H\\in\\G$, and (ii) gauge-equivariance, $A(\\theta_1,\\theta_2H)=A(\\theta_1,\\theta_2)H^{-1}$, since the two would force $H=I$ for every $H\\in\\G$. Hence no canonical coordinate transport between independently specified parameterizations exists from function-level information alone.\n\\end{proposition}\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Learned, coordinate-indexed artifacts are gauge-covariant. In same-base and exact basis-change tests on RMSNorm models, $\\Sd$ (permutation-only) transport fails by Corollary~\\ref{cor:sign-omission}; $\\Bd$ (signed-permutation) recovery matches the reference upper bound to within evaluation noise. Qwen steering rows are a single WikiText cross-seed evaluation pair, detailed in Table~\\ref{tab:qwen-steering-bd-sd}.}\n\\label{tab:artifact-covariance}\n\\begin{tabular}{lllll}\n\\toprule\nArtifact & Setting & Raw & $\\Sd$ & $\\Bd$\\\\\n\\midrule\nCoordinate identity & Qwen2.5 same-base & $60.3\\%$ ep. & -- & $91.1\\%$ tr.\\\\\nSteering (sentiment) & Qwen WikiText cross-seed & -- & $17.2\\%$ & $95.8\\%$\\\\\nSteering (refusal) & Qwen WikiText cross-seed & -- & $-32.2\\%$ effect & $+150.5\\%$ effect\\\\\nSAE reconstruction NMSE & TinyLlama $\\Bd$ basis & -- & 1.08 & 0.004\\\\\nLoRA adapter acc. & Qwen SST-2 $\\Bd$ basis & 0.622 & 0.523 & 0.944\\\\\nLoRA gain preserved & Qwen SST-2 $\\Bd$ basis & 23.0\\% & $-0.5\\%$ & 99.7\\%\\\\\nLoRA adapter acc. & TinyLlama $\\Bd$ basis & 0.770 & 0.795 & 0.950\\\\\nLoRA gain preserved & TinyLlama $\\Bd$ basis & 14.3\\% & 26.2\\% & 100.0\\%\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{proposition}[Atlas consistency iff zero holonomy]\n\\label{prop:holonomy}\nLet $V$ be a finite set of model checkpoints and $E$ a connected set of edges, each labeled $\\hat G_{ij}\\in\\Bd$. There exist gauge choices $R_i\\in\\Bd$ such that $\\hat G_{ij}=R_i^{-1}R_j$ for every edge if and only if every cycle has identity holonomy:\n\\[\n\\hat G_{i_1i_2}\\cdots \\hat G_{i_ki_1}=I.\n\\]\n\\end{proposition}\n\nA collection of pairwise gauges $\\{\\hat G_{ij}\\}\\subset\\Bd$ is a transport system only when it factors through per-checkpoint gauges: there must exist $A_i\\in\\Bd$ such that $\\hat G_{ij}=A_i^{-1}A_j$ for every pair, equivalently $\\hat G_{ii}=I$, $\\hat G_{ji}=\\hat G_{ij}^{-1}$, and $\\hat G_{ij}\\hat G_{jk}=\\hat G_{ik}$ on every triple. By Proposition~\\ref{prop:holonomy}, zero cycle holonomy is exactly this cocycle condition. Same-base trajectory transport supplies such an atlas by construction: the shared base is a function-level anchor that breaks the gauge ambiguity in Proposition~\\ref{prop:no-canonical}, and consecutive-checkpoint composition along a trajectory traces a tree, on which the cocycle holds trivially. For independently specified endpoints, no atlas is defined by the function-level data; pairwise high-scoring matches alone are therefore not transport, only candidate pieces of an atlas, and become one only if they pass cycle consistency.\n\n\\subsection{Learned coordinate-indexed artifacts are gauge-covariant}\n\nProposition~\\ref{prop:update-covariance} predicts that any learned weight update--LoRA factors, full task vectors, steering directions, SAE dictionaries--transforms by the same READ/WRITE rules as the base weights. Corollary~\\ref{cor:sign-omission} predicts $\\Sd$-only transport introduces update error of magnitude $2\\norm{\\Delta W}_F^2$ in expectation, collapsing transferred adapters to (or below) the unadapted base. Table~\\ref{tab:artifact-covariance} confirms the unified law across four artifact classes (real same-base trajectories and exact basis-change tests), spanning coordinate transport, steering vectors, SAE dictionaries, and LoRA adapters.\n\nThe Qwen2.5-1.5B LoRA row is the sharpest empirical instance of the corollary: under $\\Sd$ transport the adapter accuracy falls to 0.523, indistinguishable from the unadapted base (0.525) and below the raw transfer baseline (0.622). Under $\\Bd$ recovery the same adapter retains 99.7\\% of its gain, matching the upper-bound reference. All conditions use the same trained adapter precision, so the gap is not a dtype comparison; it is the sign-omission failure predicted by Corollary~\\ref{cor:sign-omission} for a learned coordinate-indexed update under an exact RMSNorm reparameterization.\n\nThe TinyLlama SAE row exhibits the same failure at the level of an entire dictionary: $\\Sd$ recovery yields reconstruction NMSE 1.08, while $\\Bd$ recovery matches the upper-bound reference at 0.004. Across these four artifact-class tests the pattern is identical: $\\Bd$ preserves what $\\Sd$ destroys.\n\n\\subsection{Stateful resumption: optimizer state is gauge-covariant}\n\\label{sec:stateful}\n\nThe same orientation law (Lemma~\\ref{lem:artifact-orientation}) governs stateful training: optimizer state is part of the checkpoint's coordinate-dependent representation. AdamW stores a first moment $m_W$ (an exponential moving average of gradients) and a second moment $v_W$ (an EMA of gradient squares). Under an exact $\\Bd$ reparameterization $G=P\\diag(s)$ of the residual coordinates, the gradient transforms with $W$, so $m_W$ inherits the same READ/WRITE/NORM rules; $v_W$ is the elementwise square of an inherited tensor, so its sign action squares out: $v_W\\mapsto T_{|G|}(v_W)=T_P(v_W)$.\n\n\\begin{remark}[$\\Bd$ is the maximal gauge for native AdamW]\n\\label{rem:adamw}\nAdamW's elementwise update $\\theta\\mapsto \\theta-\\eta m_W/(\\sqrt{v_W}+\\epsilon)$ presupposes \\emph{diagonal} storage of the second moment. For $G\\in\\Bd$, the gauge action preserves diagonality because $G\\diag(v_W)G^\\top=\\diag(v_WP)$, so an elementwise $v_W$ tensor remains a valid representation. For continuous orthogonal $Q\\in O(d)\\setminus\\Bd$, $Q\\diag(v_W)Q^\\top$ is dense; AdamW's diagonal storage cannot represent it without information loss. Hence $\\Bd$ is the maximal subgroup of $O(d)$ under which AdamW state is gauge-covariant given native data structures.\n\\end{remark}\n\nWe test this mechanism by warming AdamW on a real Qwen2.5-0.5B fine-tuning task, saving the model and optimizer state, applying a random $\\Bd$ gauge to the model, and resuming from alternative transported optimizer states. $\\Bd$ transport applies $T_G$ to $m_W$ and $T_{|G|}$ to $v_W$; $\\Sd$-only transport applies the correct permutation but forces all signs to $+1$. Each resumed run is compared to a gauged copy of the reference resume from the original chart. The checkpoint is already gauge-equivalent before resumption, so the post-resume difference isolates optimizer state rather than model mismatch.\n\nTable~\\ref{tab:stateful} reports the long-horizon fp32 run. After 500 warmup steps and 500 resumed steps, $\\Bd$ preserves the reference trajectory to numerical tolerance, whereas $\\Sd$ changes it by a factor of $6.6\\times10^6$ in held-out logit relative MSE. This is a trajectory-identity result, not a loss-improvement claim: the final losses can be similar, but permutation-only optimizer state no longer represents the same point in the stateful training process. Additional AdamW and SGD-momentum resumption variants are reported in Appendix~\\ref{app:optimizer}.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Stateful resumption: optimizer state is gauge-covariant. Held-out logit relative MSE between a gauge-equivalent reference resume and two optimizer-state transports. The pre-resume checkpoint is already gauge-equivalent, so the post-resume gap measures state transport.}\n\\label{tab:stateful}\n\\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{llllll}\n\\toprule\nModel/opt. & Setup & Pre & $\\Bd$ state & $\\Sd$ state & $\\Sd/\\Bd$\\\\\n\\midrule\nQwen2.5-0.5B/AdamW & fp32, $b=32$, 500+500 & $5.24\\times10^{-12}$ & $5.30\\times10^{-10}$ & $3.50\\times10^{-3}$ & $6.6\\times10^6$\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}%\n}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\paragraph{Scope.}\nThe random $\\Bd$ gauge is applied to test the orientation law, and the trainable scope is restricted to keep optimizer state tractable. The result should be read as a stateful transport test: even when two checkpoints are functionally identical, resuming with permutation-only optimizer state changes the fp32 training trajectory.\n\n\\section{Coordinate-preserving merging}\n\\label{sec:merging}\n\nWe evaluate merging in the coordinate-preserving setting: interpolation compares or averages corresponding coordinates, so RMSNorm signs are part of the correspondence. This is the setting where the discrete gauge is the relevant object; arbitrary function-level merging between divergent models can depend on dense changes beyond a signed permutation.\n\nWe use peak-above-chord barriers: for interpolation loss $L(\\alpha)$ with endpoint chord $(1-\\alpha)L(0)+\\alpha L(1)$, the barrier is\n\\[\n\\max_\\alpha L(\\alpha)-[(1-\\alpha)L(0)+\\alpha L(1)].\n\\]\nThis measures interior excess above the endpoint chord, avoiding monotone endpoint-gap artifacts.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Coordinate-preserving merge results. Across all three settings, signs are the variable that permutation-only alignment cannot represent.}\n\\label{tab:merge}\n\\begin{tabular}{lrrr}\n\\toprule\nSetting & Unaligned & $\\Sd$ perm-only & $\\Bd$ signed\\\\\n\\midrule\nLlama-2-7B gauge-scramble, 50-step FT & 6.14 & 7.69 & 0.00\\\\\n10M RMSNorm, independent seeds, same data & 1.68 & 0.66 & 0.42\\\\\nTinyLlama-1.1B, 0-step gauge-equivalent merge & 6.36 & 6.47 & 0.00\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\nIn the Llama-2-7B experiment, we reparameterize the base model by a random $\\Bd$ basis change, fine-tune the rebased copy for 50 steps on code, and interpolate weights between the original base and the aligned endpoint. The basis change is recorded by construction, so the experiment isolates whether the alignment respects the symmetry: a permutation-only alignment applies the correct permutation but forces all signs to $+1$, leaving destructive sign mismatch; signed alignment eliminates the barrier. The 10M row is a small-scale natural independent-seed sanity check; the 7B and 1.1B rows are exact-symmetry tests that isolate the sign variable at production and mid scales. In the 10M independent-seed experiment with no basis change, two RMSNorm transformers trained from different seeds develop about 50\\% sign mismatch without an imposed gauge, and $\\Bd$ alignment gives a 75\\% barrier reduction versus unaligned and a 37\\% relative improvement over $\\Sd$.\n\n\\section{Gauge audits expose coordinate non-reproducibility}\n\\label{sec:audits}\n\nThis section is not a claim that coordinates are always the right units; it is an audit for pipelines that output coordinate names. Index-level interpretability claims name a residual dimension, an MLP hidden unit, a top-$k$ set, or an SAE feature index. Such claims are not wrong, but they are relative to a gauge. The audit is simple: apply an exact gauge from the architecture's symmetry group, check that behavior or invariant quantities are unchanged, and then compare both raw and gauge-mapped coordinate names.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Gauge audits for coordinate-indexed artifacts. Each row applies an exact function-preserving reparameterization in the native gauge for the named coordinate system. Raw coordinate names move; mapped coordinates recover the original object.}\n\\label{tab:audits}\n\\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{llll}\n\\toprule\nPipeline & Invariant check & Raw coordinates & Gauge-fixed\\\\\n\\midrule\nBERT knowledge neurons [Dai et al., 2022] & same FFN function & 0/2 neurons & 2/2 mapped\\\\\nLlama-2 refusal direction [Arditi et al., 2024] & ablation $100\\%\\to15\\%$ & median 0/10 top coords. & 10/10, 100\\% gauge rec.\\\\\nCAA steering vectors [Rimsky et al., 2024] & effect error $<10^{-4}$, CKA=1 & $\\approx$0/10 top coords. & mapped effect preserved\\\\\nGradient$\\times$activation attribution & logits invariant & 0/10 top attributions & 10/10 mapped\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}%\n}\n\\end{table}\n\nThis is a gauge-equivariance test analogous to verifying that a saliency method is not sensitive to arbitrary label choices. Table~\\ref{tab:audits} shows the pattern across existing coordinate-indexed workflows. The represented object is unchanged, but raw coordinate names are not reproducible; once the gauge is applied, the same object is recovered. These audits do not dispute behavior-level conclusions; they separate invariant objects from gauge-relative coordinate names.\n\n\\begin{proposition}[Sparse coordinate interventions force $\\Bd$]\n\\label{prop:sparse}\nFor $Q\\in O(d)$, the following are equivalent: (i) for every coordinate projector $P_S$, $QP_SQ^\\top$ is another coordinate projector; (ii) every fixed-budget sparse coordinate intervention transports to another sparse coordinate intervention with the same budget; (iii) $Q\\in\\Bd$.\n\\end{proposition}\n\n\\paragraph{Proof sketch.}\nSigned permutations relabel coordinate projectors. Conversely, apply the condition to singleton projectors $e_ie_i^\\top$: each $Qe_i$ must be $\\pm e_j$, and orthogonality forces distinct targets, so $Q$ is a signed permutation.\n\nProposition~\\ref{prop:sparse} formalizes why dense orthogonal maps are not substitutes for $\\Bd$ when the object is a sparse coordinate operation: a dense rotation preserves a function after reparameterization but turns a top-$k$ coordinate edit into a dense rank-$k$ projection. Concrete interpretability examples are in Appendix~\\ref{app:related}; limitations and broader impacts are in Appendix~\\ref{app:limitations}.\n\n\\section{Conclusion}\n\nIn the native generic-gain coordinate-preserving setting, RMSNorm transformers are coordinate-identifiable up to signed permutation, not permutation alone (Theorem~\\ref{thm:native-gauge}); the missing sign component is a quantitative prediction (Corollary~\\ref{cor:sign-omission}: squared error $2\\norm{\\Delta W}_F^2$) confirmed on a Qwen2.5-1.5B SST-2 LoRA: $\\Sd$ collapses accuracy to the unadapted base (0.523), $\\Bd$ recovers the source adapter (0.944). Exact gauge audits turn this into a reproducibility test: under random gauge, raw indices move while behavior and mapped coordinates stay fixed. For sparse coordinate-indexed objects--SAEs, steering vectors, neuron sets, attribution indices, LoRA adapters, or coordinate-preserving merges--signs are part of the identity map; ``Which neuron is this?'' is well-posed once $\\Bd$ is named.\n\n\\section*{References}\n\\small\nSamuel K. Ainsworth, Jonathan Hayase, and Siddhartha Srinivasa. Git re-basin: Merging models modulo permutation symmetries. In \\emph{International Conference on Learning Representations}, 2023. URL \\url{https://openreview.net/forum?id=CQsmMYmlP5T}.\n\nAndy Arditi, Oscar Obeso, Aaquib Syed, Daniel Paleka, Nina Panickssery, Wes Gurnee, and Neel Nanda. Refusal in language models is mediated by a single direction, 2024. URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11717}.\n\nSaleh Ashkboos, Maximilian L. Croci, Marcelo Gennari do Nascimento, Torsten Hoefler, and James Hensman. SliceGPT: Compress large language models by deleting rows and columns. In \\emph{International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)}, 2024a. URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.15024}.\n\nSaleh Ashkboos, Amirkeivan Mohtashami, Maximilian L. Croci, Bo Li, Pashmina Cameron, Martin Jaggi, Dan Alistarh, Torsten Hoefler, and James Hensman. QuaRot: Outlier-free 4-bit inference in rotated LLMs. In \\emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, volume 37, 2024b. doi: 10.52202/079017-3180. URL \\url{https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2024/hash/b5b939436789f76f08b9d0da5e81af7c-Abstract-Conference.html}.\n\nJohanni Brea, Berfin Simsek, Bernd Illing, and Wulfram Gerstner. Weight-space symmetry in deep networks gives rise to permutation saddles, connected by equal-loss valleys across the loss landscape. \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.02911}, 2019. URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.02911}.\n\nTrenton Bricken, Adly Templeton, Joshua Batson, Brian Chen, Adam Jermyn, Tom Conerly, Nick Turner, Cem Anil, Carson Denison, Amanda Askell, et al. Towards monosemanticity: Decomposing language models with dictionary learning. \\emph{Transformer Circuits Thread}, 2023. URL \\url{https://transformer-circuits.pub/2023/monosemantic-features/index.html}.\n\nDavid F. Crouse. On implementing 2d rectangular assignment algorithms. \\emph{IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems}, 52(4):1679--1696, 2016. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2016.140952.\n\nDamai Dai, Li Dong, Yaru Hao, Zhifang Sui, Baobao Chang, and Furu Wei. Knowledge neurons in pretrained transformers. In \\emph{Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics}, pages 8493--8502, 2022. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.581. URL \\url{https://aclanthology.org/2022.acl-long.581/}.\n\nFelix Draxler, Kambis Veschgini, Manfred Salmhofer, and Fred A. Hamprecht. Essentially no barriers in neural network energy landscape. In \\emph{Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning}, volume 80 of \\emph{Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, pages 1309--1318, 2018. URL \\url{https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/draxler18a.html}.\n\nYanai Elazar, Nora Kassner, Shauli Ravfogel, Abhilasha Ravichander, Eduard Hovy, Hinrich Sch\\\"utze, and Yoav Goldberg. Measuring and improving consistency in pretrained language models. \\emph{Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics}, 9:1012--1031, 2021. doi: 10.1162/tacl\\_a\\_00410. URL \\url{https://aclanthology.org/2021.tacl-1.60/}.\n\nNelson Elhage, Robert Lasenby, and Christopher Olah. Privileged bases in the transformer residual stream. \\emph{Transformer Circuits Thread}, 2023. URL \\url{https://transformer-circuits.pub/2023/privileged-basis/index.html}.\n\nRahim Entezari, Hanie Sedghi, Olga Saukh, and Behnam Neyshabur. The role of permutation invariance in linear mode connectivity of neural networks. In \\emph{International Conference on Learning Representations}, 2022. URL \\url{https://openreview.net/forum?id=dNigytemkL}.\n\nC. Daniel Freeman and Joan Bruna. Topology and geometry of half-rectified network optimization. In \\emph{International Conference on Learning Representations}, 2017. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1611.01540. URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.01540}.\n\nLeo Gao, Tom Dupr\\'e la Tour, Henk Tillman, Gabriel Goh, Rajan Troll, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, Jan Leike, and Jeffrey Wu. Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders. In \\emph{International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)}, Oral, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.04093. URL \\url{https://openreview.net/forum?id=tcsZt9ZNKD}.\n\nTimur Garipov, Pavel Izmailov, Dmitrii Podoprikhin, Dmitry Vetrov, and Andrew Gordon Wilson. Loss surfaces, mode connectivity, and fast ensembling of DNNs. In \\emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 2018. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1802.10026. URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.10026}.\n\nGabriel Ilharco, Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Mitchell Wortsman, Suchin Gururangan, Ludwig Schmidt, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, and Ali Farhadi. Editing models with task arithmetic. In \\emph{International Conference on Learning Representations}, 2023. URL \\url{https://openreview.net/forum?id=6t0Kwf8-jrj}.\n\nMoritz Imfeld, Jacopo Graldi, Marco Giordano, Thomas Hofmann, Sotiris Anagnostidis, and Sidak Pal Singh. Transformer fusion with optimal transport. In \\emph{International Conference on Learning Representations}, 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.05719. URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.05719}.\n\nRoy Jonker and Anton Volgenant. A shortest augmenting path algorithm for dense and sparse linear assignment problems. \\emph{Computing}, 38(4):325--340, 1987.\n\nSimon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Honglak Lee, and Geoffrey Hinton. Similarity of neural network representations revisited. In \\emph{Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning}, pages 3519--3529, 2019.\n\nHarold W. Kuhn. The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. \\emph{Naval Research Logistics Quarterly}, 2(1--2):83--97, 1955.\n\nYixuan Li, Jason Yosinski, Jeff Clune, Hod Lipson, and John Hopcroft. Convergent learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations? In \\emph{International Conference on Learning Representations}, 2016. URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.07543}.\n\nStephen Merity, Caiming Xiong, James Bradbury, and Richard Socher. Pointer sentinel mixture models. In \\emph{International Conference on Learning Representations}, 2017.\n\nAri Morcos, Maithra Raghu, and Samy Bengio. Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlation. \\emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 31, 2018.\n\nGon\\c{c}alo Paulo and Nora Belrose. Sparse autoencoders trained on the same data learn different features. In \\emph{International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)}, Poster, 2026. URL \\url{https://openreview.net/forum?id=EjInprGpk9}.\n\nMaithra Raghu, Justin Gilmer, Jason Yosinski, and Jascha Sohl-Dickstein. SVCCA: Singular vector canonical correlation analysis for deep learning dynamics and interpretability. \\emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 30, 2017.\n\nNina Rimsky, Nick Gabrieli, Julian Schulz, Meg Tong, Evan Hubinger, and Alexander Turner. Steering llama 2 via contrastive activation addition. In \\emph{Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)}, pages 15504--15522. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024. doi: 10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.828. URL \\url{https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.828/}.\n\nSidak Pal Singh and Martin Jaggi. Model fusion via optimal transport. In \\emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 2020. URL \\url{https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/fb2697869f56484404c8ceee2985b01d-Abstract.html}.\n\nGeorge Stoica, Daniel Bolya, Jakob Bjorner, Pratik Ramesh, Taylor Hearn, and Judy Hoffman. ZipIt! merging models from different tasks without training. In \\emph{International Conference on Learning Representations}, 2024. URL \\url{https://iclr.cc/virtual/2024/poster/18869}.\n\nN. Joseph Tatro, Pin-Yu Chen, Payel Das, Igor Melnyk, Prasanna Sattigeri, and Rongjie Lai. Optimizing mode connectivity via neuron alignment. In \\emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, volume 33, pages 15300--15311, 2020.\n\nAlexander Theus, Alessandro Cabodi, Sotiris Anagnostidis, Antonio Orvieto, Sidak Pal Singh, and Valentina Boeva. Generalized Linear Mode Connectivity for Transformers. In \\emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 2025. URL \\url{https://openreview.net/forum?id=KurYdcCbjv}.\n\nHugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, et al. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288}, 2023. URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.09288}.\n\nNeha Verma and Maha Elbayad. Merging text transformer models from different initializations. \\emph{Transactions on Machine Learning Research}, 2024. URL \\url{https://openreview.net/forum?id=nWnYSLncXa}.\n\nPauli Virtanen, Ralf Gommers, Travis E. Oliphant, Matt Haberland, Tyler Reddy, David Cournapeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, St\\'efan J. van der Walt, Matthew Brett, Joshua Wilson, K. Jarrod Millman, Nikolay Mayorov, Andrew R. J. Nelson, Eric Jones, Robert Kern, Eric Larson, C. J. Carey, \\.Ilhan Polat, Yu Feng, Eric W. Moore, Jake VanderPlas, Denis Laxalde, Josef Perktold, Robert Cimrman, Ian Henriksen, E. A. Quintero, Charles R. Harris, Anne M. Archibald, Ant\\^onio H. Ribeiro, Fabian Pedregosa, Paul van Mulbregt, and SciPy 1.0 Contributors. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. \\emph{Nature Methods}, 17:261--272, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2.\n\nThomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, Remi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, Joe Davison, Sam Shleifer, Patrick von Platen, Clara Ma, Yacine Jernite, Julien Plu, Canwen Xu, Teven Le Scao, Sylvain Gugger, Mariama Drame, Quentin Lhoest, and Alexander Rush. Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. In \\emph{Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations}, pages 38--45, Online, October 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6. URL \\url{https://aclanthology.org/2020.emnlp-demos.6/}.\n\nMitchell Wortsman, Gabriel Ilharco, Samir Y. Gadre, Rebecca Roelofs, Raphael Gontijo-Lopes, Ari S. Morcos, Hongseok Namkoong, Ali Farhadi, Yair Carmon, Simon Kornblith, and Ludwig Schmidt. Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference time. In \\emph{Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning}, volume 162 of \\emph{Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, pages 23965--23998. PMLR, 2022.\n\nPrateek Yadav, Derek Tam, Leshem Choshen, Colin Raffel, and Mohit Bansal. TIES-merging: Resolving interference when merging models. In \\emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2306.01708. URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.01708}.\n\nAn Yang, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, et al. Qwen2.5 technical report, 2024a. URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15115}.\n\nEnneng Yang, Li Shen, Guibing Guo, Xingwei Wang, Xiaochun Cao, Jie Zhang, and Dacheng Tao. Model merging in LLMs, MLLMs, and beyond: Methods, theories, applications and opportunities. \\emph{arXiv preprint}, 2024b. URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07666}.\n\nBiao Zhang and Rico Sennrich. Root mean square layer normalization. \\emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 32, 2019.\n\nBinchi Zhang, Zaiyi Zheng, Zhengzhang Chen, and Jundong Li. Beyond the permutation symmetry of transformers: The role of rotation for model fusion. In \\emph{Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning}, volume 267 of \\emph{Proceedings of Machine Learning Research}, pages 77090--77106. PMLR, 2025. URL \\url{https://proceedings.mlr.press/v267/zhang25dk.html}.\n\n\\normalsize\n\\appendix\n\n\\section{Additional symmetry-boundary figures}\n\\label{app:figures}\n\n\\begin{figure}[h]\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/figure1_symmetry_boundary.png}\n\\caption{Symmetry-boundary validation for the native gauge. LayerNorm models are invariant to permutations but fail under independent sign flips; biases must transform under the residual gauge; RMSNorm models pass full signed-permutation gauges. Dashed lines indicate the $\\sim10^{-4}$ numerical tolerance threshold.}\n\\label{fig:symmetry-boundary}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\section{Proof of Theorem 2.1}\n\\label{app:proof-gauge}\n\nRoadmap: we establish module-level gauge transform rules (norms, linear layers, attention), then compose them via residual addition and a layerwise induction to prove Theorem~\\ref{thm:native-gauge}. We present the decoder-only case for concreteness, using the row-vector convention: residual activations $H\\in\\R^{n\\times d}$ are matrices with tokens as rows, and the gauge acts by right multiplication $H^G=HG$.\n\n\\begin{definition}[Gauge action]\nFor permutation gauge $G=P\\in\\Sd$, $P$ is a permutation matrix with $P_{i,\\pi(i)}=1$. For signed permutation gauge $G=PS\\in\\Bd$, additionally $S=\\diag(s_1,\\ldots,s_d)$ with $s_i\\in\\{-1,+1\\}$. In both cases, the gauge action on residual activations $H\\in\\R^{n\\times d}$ is $H^G:=HG$.\n\\end{definition}\n\n\\begin{lemma}[RMSNorm equivariance]\n\\label{lem:rmsnorm}\nDefine\n\\[\n\\RMSNorm(h;\\gamma)=\\frac{h}{\\sqrt{\\frac1d\\sum_i h_i^2+\\epsilon}}\\odot\\gamma\n\\]\nfor row vector $h$. With $\\gamma^G_j:=\\gamma_{\\pi^{-1}(j)}$ (permute only, no sign), we have\n\\[\n\\RMSNorm(hG;\\gamma^G)=\\RMSNorm(h;\\gamma)\\cdot G.\n\\]\n\\end{lemma}\n\n\\paragraph{Proof.}\nMean square is invariant under signed permutations: $\\frac1d\\sum_i(hG)_i^2=\\frac1d\\sum_i h_i^2$. Thus $\\RMS(hG)=\\RMS(h)$, so $\\RMSNorm(hG;\\gamma^G)=hG/\\RMS(h)\\odot\\gamma^G$. The permuted $\\gamma^G$ aligns elementwise scaling with the permuted coordinates, giving $(h/\\RMS(h)\\odot\\gamma)G$.\n\n\\paragraph{Why $\\gamma$ permutes but does not flip signs.}\nThe sign flip is absorbed into the activation $h$, not $\\gamma$. Specifically, $(hG)_j=s_jh_{\\pi^{-1}(j)}$ carries the sign, while $\\gamma^G_j=\\gamma_{\\pi^{-1}(j)}$ only permutes. The elementwise product $(hG\\odot\\gamma^G)_j=s_jh_{\\pi^{-1}(j)}\\gamma_{\\pi^{-1}(j)}=s_j(h\\odot\\gamma)_{\\pi^{-1}(j)}=((h\\odot\\gamma)G)_j$.\n\n\\begin{lemma}[LayerNorm equivariance]\n\\label{lem:layernorm}\nDefine\n\\[\n\\LayerNorm(h;\\gamma,\\beta)=\\gamma\\odot\\frac{h-\\mu(h)}{\\sigma(h)}+\\beta,\n\\qquad\n\\mu(h)=\\frac1d\\sum_i h_i.\n\\]\nFor permutation $P\\in\\Sd$ with $\\gamma^P_j=\\gamma_{\\pi^{-1}(j)}$ and $\\beta^P_j=\\beta_{\\pi^{-1}(j)}$,\n\\[\n\\LayerNorm(hP;\\gamma^P,\\beta^P)=\\LayerNorm(h;\\gamma,\\beta)\\cdot P.\n\\]\nMore generally, $\\epsilon P$ with $\\epsilon\\in\\{\\pm1\\}$ is equivariant if $\\beta^P$ is replaced by $\\epsilon\\beta^P$. Signed permutations with nonconstant sign pattern are not equivariant in general.\n\\end{lemma}\n\n\\paragraph{Proof.}\nFor permutation $P$, $\\mu(hP)=\\frac1d\\sum_j(hP)_j=\\frac1d\\sum_j h_{\\pi^{-1}(j)}=\\mu(h)$. Thus $(hP-\\mu(hP))=(h-\\mu(h))P$ and LayerNorm is $\\Sd$-equivariant. For $\\epsilon=-1$, $\\mu(-hP)=-\\mu(h)$ and the normalized centered vector changes by the same global sign, giving\n\\[\n\\LayerNorm(-hP;\\gamma^P,-\\beta^P)=\\LayerNorm(h;\\gamma,\\beta)(-P).\n\\]\nFor signed permutation with nonconstant sign flips, $\\mu(hG)=\\frac1d\\sum_j s_jh_{\\pi^{-1}(j)}\\ne \\pm\\mu(h)$ in general. Thus $(hG-\\mu(hG))\\ne(h-\\mu(h))G$, breaking equivariance.\n\n\\begin{lemma}[Post-norm wrapper]\n\\label{lem:postnorm}\nLet $G$ be an admissible gauge. Suppose $\\Delta$ is gauge-equivariant, $\\Delta^G(HG)=\\Delta(H)G$, and $N$ is gauge-equivariant, $N^G(HG)=N(H)G$. Then $\\Phi(H)=N(H+\\Delta(H))$ is gauge-equivariant: $\\Phi^G(HG)=\\Phi(H)G$.\n\\end{lemma}\n\n\\paragraph{Proof.}\n$\\Phi^G(HG)=N^G(HG+\\Delta^G(HG))=N^G((H+\\Delta(H))G)=N(H+\\Delta(H))G$.\n\n\\begin{lemma}[Linear layer transforms under HuggingFace convention]\n\\label{lem:linear}\nHuggingFace Linear computes $Y=XW^\\top+b$ with $W\\in\\R^{d_{\\rm out}\\times d_{\\rm in}}$. Under gauge $X^G=XG$:\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item READ (input from residual, output unchanged): set $W^G=WG$, $b^G=b$. Then $Y^G=X^G(W^G)^\\top+b^G=XGG^\\top W^\\top+b=XW^\\top+b=Y$.\n\\item WRITE (output to residual): set $W^G=G^\\top W$, $b^G=bG$. Then $Y^G=X(W^G)^\\top+b^G=XW^\\top G+bG=(XW^\\top+b)G=YG$.\n\\end{itemize}\n\\end{lemma}\n\n\\begin{lemma}[Attention invariance]\n\\label{lem:attention}\nWith $Q,K,V$ projections as READ layers, the projected queries, keys, and values are unchanged under the gauge reparameterization. Therefore attention weights $\\operatorname{softmax}(QK^\\top/\\sqrt{d_k})$ are identical, and only the output projection (WRITE) produces a gauged residual contribution.\n\\end{lemma}\n\n\\paragraph{Proof.}\nLet $H^G=HG$ be the gauged input to attention. Q-projection is READ: $Q=HW_Q^\\top+b_Q$ becomes\n\\[\nQ^G=H^G(W_Q^G)^\\top+b_Q=HGG^\\top W_Q^\\top+b_Q=HW_Q^\\top+b_Q=Q.\n\\]\nSimilarly $K^G=K$ and $V^G=V$. $Q/K/V$ biases are in head space, not residual space, so they remain unchanged under gauge. Therefore attention weights are unchanged. The O-projection is WRITE, producing $\\Delta^G=\\Delta G$.\n\n\\paragraph{Proof of Theorem~\\ref{thm:native-gauge}.}\nBy induction on layers. Let $H_\\ell^G=H_\\ell G$ at layer $\\ell$. Base case: token embeddings $E=W_{\\rm emb}[\\mathrm{tokens}]$ are row vectors. With $W_{\\rm emb}^G=W_{\\rm emb}G$, we have $E^G=EG=H_0G$. For the inductive step, given $H_\\ell^G=H_\\ell G$, let $\\Delta$ be the attention or MLP update. If the block is pre-norm, $H'=H_\\ell+\\Delta(N(H_\\ell))$; Lemma~\\ref{lem:rmsnorm} or~\\ref{lem:layernorm} and Lemma~\\ref{lem:attention} (or Lemma~\\ref{lem:linear} for MLP) give $H'^G=H'G$. If post-norm, $H'=N(H_\\ell+\\Delta(H_\\ell))$; $\\Delta^G(H_\\ell^G)=\\Delta(H_\\ell)G$ and Lemma~\\ref{lem:postnorm} yields $H'^G=H'G$. Applying this to attention and MLP gives $H_{\\ell+1}^G=H_{\\ell+1}G$.\n\nFor the output, the LM head is READ from the final residual. With $W_{\\rm head}^G=W_{\\rm head}G$,\n\\[\n\\operatorname{logits}^G=H_L^G(W_{\\rm head}^G)^\\top\n=H_LGG^\\top W_{\\rm head}^\\top\n=H_LW_{\\rm head}^\\top\n=\\operatorname{logits}.\n\\]\n\\emph{Tied embeddings:} When $W_{\\rm head}=W_{\\rm emb}$ (weight tying), both transform identically as $W^G=WG$, preserving the tie. This is automatic since both are READ layers from/to the residual stream.\n\nTwo constraints determine the gauge group. For RMSNorm, the diagonal learned gain $\\gamma$ must remain diagonal under gauge. For a generic gain vector, or a jointly generic family of gain vectors sharing a residual chart, the simultaneous stabilizer in $O(d)$ is exactly the signed permutation group $\\Bd$. Exact tied coordinates across all relevant gains can admit block-orthogonal stabilizers, but these do not preserve sparse coordinate identity; all results use the always-present $\\Bd$ subgroup. For LayerNorm, mean-centering breaks independent sign symmetry. For signed permutation $G$ with signs $s_i$, the mean $\\mu(xG)=\\frac1d\\sum_j s_jx_{\\pi^{-1}(j)}$ generally differs from $\\pm\\mu(x)$ unless all signs are equal. Thus generic affine LayerNorm admits $\\{\\pm P:P\\in\\Sd\\}$, where the negative component requires $\\beta\\mapsto-\\beta P$; its per-index relabeling content is $\\Sd$. Both groups are large: $|\\Sd|=d!$ and $|\\Bd|=d!\\cdot 2^d$. The factor of $2^d$ distinguishes the architectures, but both imply neuron indices are non-identifiable without fixing a gauge.\n\n\\begin{remark}[Generic $\\gamma$ and practical degeneracies]\nFor RMSNorm $\\RMSNorm(x)=x/\\norm{x}\\odot\\gamma$, the admissible gauge $G$ must preserve diagonality under conjugation: $G^\\top\\diag(\\gamma)G$ remains diagonal (possibly permuted). For generic $\\gamma$ (distinct entries), the only orthogonal matrices with this property are signed permutations, i.e., $\\Bd$; if $\\gamma_i=\\gamma_j$ for some $i\\ne j$, a single RMSNorm layer also admits rotations within the equal-$\\gamma$ subspace.\n\nExact repeats in learned $\\gamma$ can occur in real checkpoints, especially in low-precision formats such as bf16/fp16, which can enlarge the admissible symmetry beyond $\\Bd$ for a given RMSNorm layer. For a transformer-wide residual chart, the continuous part is the intersection of these per-layer stabilizers across all RMSNorms sharing the chart. We do not rely on this enlargement; all results use the always-present discrete subgroup $\\Bd$.\n\n\\textbf{Algorithm behavior with continuous symmetry:} Our activation-based alignment (\\S\\ref{sec:recovery}) selects one representative from the equivalence class---specifically, the discrete signed permutation that maximizes activation cross-correlation. Within equal-$\\gamma$ subspaces where continuous rotations are valid, this representative is determined by the probe activations and assignment tie-breaking. This choice is reproducible for a fixed probe set even when the underlying symmetry group is larger than $\\Bd$. Similarly, for LayerNorm with repeated $(\\gamma_i,\\beta_i)$ pairs, additional permutations within tied subspaces are valid.\n\\end{remark}\n\n\\section{Proof of atlas consistency}\n\n\\paragraph{Proof of Proposition~\\ref{prop:holonomy}.}\nIf $\\hat G_{ij}=R_i^{-1}R_j$, then every cycle product telescopes:\n\\[\n\\hat G_{i_1i_2}\\hat G_{i_2i_3}\\cdots\\hat G_{i_ki_1}\n=R_{i_1}^{-1}R_{i_2}R_{i_2}^{-1}\\cdots R_{i_k}^{-1}R_{i_1}\n=I.\n\\]\nConversely, fix a root $r$. For any vertex $i$, choose a path from $r$ to $i$ and define $R_i$ as the ordered product of edge labels along that path. Zero holonomy makes $R_i$ path-independent: two paths from $r$ to $i$ form a cycle after reversing one path, so their products agree. For an edge $(i,j)$, the path to $i$ followed by that edge is a path to $j$; path-independence therefore gives $R_j=R_i\\hat G_{ij}$, hence $\\hat G_{ij}=R_i^{-1}R_j$.\n\n\\section{Proofs for artifact covariance}\n\n\\paragraph{Proof of Proposition~\\ref{prop:update-covariance}.}\nThe parameter map $T_G$ is modulewise multiplication by fixed matrices $G$, $G^\\top$, or by the corresponding permutation of norm gains. Hence it is affine in the base parameters and linear on increments:\n\\[\nT_G(\\theta+\\Delta\\theta)-T_G(\\theta)=T_G^{\\rm lin}(\\Delta\\theta).\n\\]\nFor a LoRA update $\\Delta W=BA$, the READ rule is $\\Delta W^G=\\Delta WG=B(AG)$, so $A^G=AG$, $B^G=B$. The WRITE rule is $\\Delta W^G=G^\\top\\Delta W=(G^\\top B)A$, so $A^G=A$, $B^G=G^\\top B$.\n\n\\paragraph{Proof of Corollary~\\ref{cor:sign-omission}.}\nWrite $G=PS$, with $S=\\diag(s)$. Let $M=\\Delta WP$. Then\n\\[\n\\norm{\\Delta WPS-\\Delta WP}_F^2\n=\\norm{MS-M}_F^2\n=\\sum_j(s_j-1)^2\\norm{M_{:,j}}_2^2\n=4\\sum_{j:s_j=-1}\\norm{(\\Delta WP)_{:,j}}_2^2.\n\\]\nSince $P$ is orthogonal, $\\sum_j\\norm{(\\Delta WP)_{:,j}}_2^2=\\norm{\\Delta W}_F^2$. Under iid uniform signs, each column contributes with probability $1/2$, giving $2\\norm{\\Delta W}_F^2$ in expectation.\n\n\\paragraph{Proof of Lemma~\\ref{lem:artifact-orientation}.}\nThe norm identity is the vector version of the preceding proof with $m=vP$:\n\\[\n\\norm{vG-vP}_2^2=\\norm{mS-m}_2^2\n=4\\sum_{j:s_j=-1}m_j^2.\n\\]\nThe cosine follows from $\\inner{vG}{vP}=\\inner{mS}{m}=\\sum_j s_jm_j^2$ and $\\norm{vG}_2=\\norm{vP}_2=\\norm{m}_2$.\n\n\\section{Proofs for decomposition and matching ceiling}\n\\label{app:decomp}\n\n\\paragraph{Proof of Theorem~\\ref{thm:discrete-content}.}\nFor any signed permutation $P\\in\\Bd$,\n\\[\n\\norm{Q-P}_F^2=\\norm{Q}_F^2+\\norm{P}_F^2-2\\tr(Q^\\top P)=2d-2\\tr(Q^\\top P),\n\\]\nso minimizing Frobenius distance is equivalent to maximizing $\\tr(Q^\\top P)$. Write $P$ as a permutation $\\sigma$ plus signs $\\epsilon_j\\in\\{\\pm1\\}$, with column $j$ mapped to row $\\sigma(j)$. Then\n\\[\n\\tr(Q^\\top P)=\\sum_j \\epsilon_jQ_{\\sigma(j),j}.\n\\]\nFor a fixed $\\sigma$, the optimal sign is $\\epsilon_j=\\operatorname{sign}(Q_{\\sigma(j),j})$, giving objective $\\sum_j |Q_{\\sigma(j),j}|$. Maximizing this over permutations is exactly a linear assignment problem on $|Q|$. Generically the assignment has a unique maximizer; ties are the only source of non-uniqueness. Since both $Q$ and $P^\\star$ are orthogonal, $R=Q(P^\\star)^{-1}$ is orthogonal. Finally,\n\\[\n\\norm{R-I}_F=\\norm{Q(P^\\star)^{-1}-I}_F=\\norm{Q-P^\\star}_F\n\\]\nby right-invariance of the Frobenius norm. The scalar $\\rho(Q)=d^{-1}\\tr(Q^\\top P^\\star)$ is one iff $Q=P^\\star\\in\\Bd$ by the distance identity above. For Haar-random $Q$, the largest entry in each column is $O(\\sqrt{\\log d/d})$ in expectation, and assignment can improve constants but not order, giving $\\mathbb{E}\\rho(Q)=O(\\sqrt{\\log d/d})$.\n\n\\paragraph{Proof of Theorem~\\ref{thm:ceiling}.}\nLet the target columns satisfy $v_{\\pi^\\star(i)}=s_i^\\star u_i$ in population, up to sampling noise, and assume $\\mathbb{E}[u_iu_j]=0$ for $i\\ne j$ with variance $\\sigma_i^2>0$ on coordinate $i$. Assignment is unchanged by positive rescaling, so work with the empirical covariance $\\widehat C=N^{-1}H_s^\\top H_t$, which obeys\n\\[\n\\widehat C_{i,j}\\xrightarrow[N\\to\\infty]{}s_i^\\star\\sigma_i^2\\mathbf{1}\\{j=\\pi^\\star(i)\\}.\n\\]\nAll off-diagonal entries vanish in population. If $s_i^\\star=+1$, the correct entry is the unique positive entry in row $i$, so signed-correlation maximization can select it. If $s_i^\\star=-1$, the correct entry is the most negative population entry in its row, while all incorrect entries are zero; a maximizer of $\\sum_i C_{i,\\pi(i)}$ therefore avoids that entry whenever an off-diagonal assignment is available. Hungarian's global one-to-one constraint must displace some other row in exchange: when there are $k\\ge2$ negative signs, swapping any two negative-sign rows yields strict gain $\\sigma_{i_1}^2+\\sigma_{i_2}^2>0$ over the truth, so the maximizer strictly avoids all $k$ negatives. The event $k\\le1$ has probability $O(d2^{-d})$ under iid uniform signs. Hence signed-correlation matching has limiting accuracy equal to the positive-sign fraction except on this event, giving expectation $1/2+O(d2^{-d})$ under independent uniform signs.\n\nBy contrast, $|\\widehat C_{i,\\pi^\\star(i)}|\\to\\sigma_i^2>0$ and $|\\widehat C_{i,j}|\\to0$ for $j\\ne\\pi^\\star(i)$. Under standard sub-Gaussian probe assumptions, concentration plus a union bound gives $\\norm{\\widehat C-C}_\\infty=O(\\sqrt{\\log d/N})$; if this perturbation is smaller than the assignment margin, Lemma~\\ref{lem:assignment-margin} preserves the true assignment. Thus sign-marginalized matching converges to the true permutation.\n\n\\subsection{FFN hidden unit symmetry}\n\nThe residual gauge acts on the $d$-dimensional residual stream. MLP hidden units live in a separate $d_{\\rm ffn}$-dimensional space. We first show that FFN hidden activations are invariant under the residual gauge, then prove they admit their own independent permutation symmetry.\n\n\\begin{lemma}[FFN hidden invariance under residual gauge]\n\\label{lem:ffn-hidden}\nUnder any admissible residual gauge $G$ (i.e., $G\\in\\{\\pm P:P\\in\\Sd\\}$ for LayerNorm models or $G\\in\\Bd$ for RMSNorm models), the FFN hidden-layer activations are invariant, not just equivariant. That is, if $H^G=HG$ and weights transform as READ/WRITE (Table~\\ref{tab:module-rules}), then the $d_{\\rm ffn}$-dimensional hidden activations are identical: $A^G=A$.\n\\end{lemma}\n\n\\paragraph{Proof.}\nFor a plain 2-layer FFN, let $\\Delta_{\\rm MLP}(H)=\\sigma(HW_{\\rm up}^\\top+b_{\\rm up})W_{\\rm down}^\\top+b_{\\rm down}$ under row-vector convention. Under the residual gauge, $W_{\\rm up}$ is READ, $W_{\\rm up}^G=W_{\\rm up}G$, $b_{\\rm up}^G=b_{\\rm up}$; $W_{\\rm down}$ is WRITE, $W_{\\rm down}^G=G^\\top W_{\\rm down}$, $b_{\\rm down}^G=b_{\\rm down}G$. The preactivation into the hidden units is\n\\[\nZ^G=H^G(W_{\\rm up}^G)^\\top+b_{\\rm up}^G\n=(HG)(W_{\\rm up}G)^\\top+b_{\\rm up}\n=HG G^\\top W_{\\rm up}^\\top+b_{\\rm up}\n=HW_{\\rm up}^\\top+b_{\\rm up}=Z.\n\\]\nSince $\\sigma$ is elementwise, $A^G=\\sigma(Z^G)=\\sigma(Z)=A$. The hidden activations are \\emph{literally identical}.\n\n\\emph{Gated MLP (Llama/SwiGLU).} For $\\Delta_{\\rm MLP}(H)=(\\sigma(HW_{\\rm gate}^\\top+b_{\\rm gate})\\odot(HW_{\\rm up}^\\top+b_{\\rm up}))W_{\\rm down}^\\top+b_{\\rm down}$: Both $W_{\\rm gate}$ and $W_{\\rm up}$ are READ layers, so the same $GG^\\top=I$ cancellation applies to both branches. Thus both the gated and linear pre-activations are unchanged, their Hadamard product is unchanged, and the hidden activations are invariant.\n\n\\emph{Output equivariance.} The down-projection is WRITE, so:\n\\[\n\\Delta_{\\rm MLP}^G=A(W_{\\rm down}^G)^\\top+b_{\\rm down}^G\n=A(G^\\top W_{\\rm down})^\\top+b_{\\rm down}G\n=AW_{\\rm down}^\\top G+b_{\\rm down}G\n=\\Delta_{\\rm MLP}\\cdot G.\n\\]\nThe FFN contribution is equivariant (picks up $G$ on output), while internal hidden activations are invariant.\n\n\\begin{corollary}\nMethods that output top-$k$ FFN hidden unit indices (e.g., ``knowledge neurons'') are gauge-variant under the FFN symmetry ($S_{d_{\\rm ffn}}$ for plain FFNs, $B_{d_{\\rm ffn}}$ for gated FFNs), but are not affected by the residual gauge $G$. Thus such methods require gauge-fixing for the FFN symmetry, which is independent of the residual-stream symmetry analyzed in our main theorems.\n\\end{corollary}\n\n\\begin{theorem}[FFN permutation symmetry]\nFor each FFN (MLP) layer with intermediate dimension $d_{\\rm ffn}$ and elementwise activation $\\sigma$, the permutation group $S_{d_{\\rm ffn}}$ acts on the hidden unit indices while leaving the layer output invariant. Specifically, for $P\\in S_{d_{\\rm ffn}}$, define\n\\[\nW'_{\\rm up}=P^\\top W_{\\rm up},\\quad b'_{\\rm up}=b_{\\rm up}P,\\qquad\nW'_{\\rm down}=W_{\\rm down}P,\\quad b'_{\\rm down}=b_{\\rm down}.\n\\]\nThen $\\operatorname{FFN}'(x)=\\operatorname{FFN}(x)$ for all inputs $x$. For gated FFNs (Llama/SwiGLU), the same permutation $P$ applies to both branches: $W'_{\\rm gate}=P^\\top W_{\\rm gate}$ and $b'_{\\rm gate}=b_{\\rm gate}P$. For plain (non-gated) FFNs, sign flips are not a symmetry because common activations (GELU, SiLU, ReLU) are not odd functions. Gated FFNs admit additional sign symmetry; see Proposition~\\ref{prop:gated-signed}.\n\\end{theorem}\n\n\\paragraph{Proof.}\nLet $\\operatorname{FFN}(x)=\\sigma(xW_{\\rm up}^\\top+b_{\\rm up})W_{\\rm down}^\\top+b_{\\rm down}$ (row-vector convention), with $W_{\\rm up}\\in\\R^{d_{\\rm ffn}\\times d_{\\rm model}}$ and $W_{\\rm down}\\in\\R^{d_{\\rm model}\\times d_{\\rm ffn}}$.\n\nDefine the hidden activations $h:=\\sigma(xW_{\\rm up}^\\top+b_{\\rm up})\\in\\R^{1\\times d_{\\rm ffn}}$. With the transformed weights:\n\\[\n(W'_{\\rm up})^\\top=(P^\\top W_{\\rm up})^\\top=W_{\\rm up}^\\top P\n\\]\nso the new preactivation is:\n\\[\nx(W'_{\\rm up})^\\top+b'_{\\rm up}=xW_{\\rm up}^\\top P+b_{\\rm up}P=(xW_{\\rm up}^\\top+b_{\\rm up})P.\n\\]\nSince $\\sigma$ is elementwise, it commutes with coordinate permutations:\n\\[\nh'=\\sigma((xW_{\\rm up}^\\top+b_{\\rm up})P)=\\sigma(xW_{\\rm up}^\\top+b_{\\rm up})P=hP.\n\\]\nFor the output:\n\\[\n(W'_{\\rm down})^\\top=(W_{\\rm down}P)^\\top=P^\\top W_{\\rm down}^\\top\n\\]\nso:\n\\[\ny'=h'(W'_{\\rm down})^\\top+b_{\\rm down}=(hP)(P^\\top W_{\\rm down}^\\top)+b_{\\rm down}=h(PP^\\top)W_{\\rm down}^\\top+b_{\\rm down}.\n\\]\nSince $P$ is a permutation matrix, $PP^\\top=I$, so $y'=hW_{\\rm down}^\\top+b_{\\rm down}=y$.\n\n\\begin{proposition}[Signed-permutation subgroup of gated FFNs]\n\\label{prop:gated-signed}\nFor gated FFNs (SwiGLU/GLU as in Llama/Mistral/Qwen), $B_{d_{\\rm ffn}}$ is an exact orthogonal hidden-coordinate symmetry subgroup, not merely $S_{d_{\\rm ffn}}$.\n\\end{proposition}\n\nFor $P\\in S_{d_{\\rm ffn}}$ and $S=\\diag(s_1,\\ldots,s_{d_{\\rm ffn}})$, define\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n&W'_{\\rm gate}=P^\\top W_{\\rm gate},\\quad b'_{\\rm gate}=b_{\\rm gate}P,\\quad\nW'_{\\rm up}=SP^\\top W_{\\rm up},\\quad b'_{\\rm up}=b_{\\rm up}PS,\\\\\n&W'_{\\rm down}=W_{\\rm down}PS,\\quad b'_{\\rm down}=b_{\\rm down}.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nThen $\\operatorname{FFN}'(x)=\\operatorname{FFN}(x)$ for all $x$, and the post-gating hidden vector transforms as $A'(x)=A(x)PS$.\n\n\\paragraph{Proof.}\nLet $u(x)=xW_{\\rm up}^\\top+b_{\\rm up}$ (linear branch) and $g(x)=xW_{\\rm gate}^\\top+b_{\\rm gate}$ (gate branch). Under the transform:\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\nu'(x)&=x(W'_{\\rm up})^\\top+b'_{\\rm up}\\\\\n&=x(SP^\\top W_{\\rm up})^\\top+b_{\\rm up}PS\\\\\n&=(xW_{\\rm up}^\\top+b_{\\rm up})PS=u(x)PS,\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nand $g'(x)=g(x)P$, hence $\\sigma(g'(x))=\\sigma(g(x))P$ since $\\sigma$ is elementwise. The post-gating hidden vector becomes:\n\\[\nA'(x)=\\sigma(g'(x))\\odot u'(x)=(\\sigma(g(x))P)\\odot(u(x)PS)=(\\sigma(g(x))\\odot u(x))PS=A(x)PS.\n\\]\nFor the output:\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n\\operatorname{FFN}'(x)&=A'(x)(W'_{\\rm down})^\\top+b_{\\rm down}\\\\\n&=A(x)PS(W_{\\rm down}PS)^\\top+b_{\\rm down}\\\\\n&=A(x)W_{\\rm down}^\\top+b_{\\rm down}=\\operatorname{FFN}(x),\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nsince $PS$ is orthogonal and $(PS)(PS)^\\top=I$.\n\n\\begin{remark}[Additional diagonal scaling in gated FFNs]\nThe signed-permutation subgroup is not the full parameter symmetry of a gated FFN. For any invertible diagonal $D$ in hidden space, the transform $W'_{\\rm up}=DW_{\\rm up}$, $b'_{\\rm up}=b_{\\rm up}D$, $W'_{\\rm down}=W_{\\rm down}D^{-1}$, with the gate branch unchanged, also preserves the FFN function. This larger scaling symmetry is non-orthogonal unless $D$ has $\\pm1$ diagonal entries, so it is separate from the residual-stream coordinate-preserving group studied in the main text.\n\\end{remark}\n\n\\begin{remark}[Why Gated FFNs Admit Sign Flips]\nThe key point is that the hidden-unit sign matrix acts on the \\emph{linear} branch $u(x)$ (via $W_{\\rm up}$), not inside the nonlinear gate $\\sigma(g(x))$. Although $\\sigma$ (SiLU/GELU) is not odd, the sign acts on $u(x)$ which is then multiplied by $\\sigma(g(x))$. This is distinct from plain FFNs where the nonlinearity directly acts on the pre-activation.\n\\end{remark}\n\n\\begin{remark}[Independence of Symmetries]\nThe residual gauge $G\\in\\Bd$ and FFN hidden transform act on orthogonal index sets and can be applied simultaneously. The residual gauge acts on the $d_{\\rm model}$ \\textbf{columns} of $W_{\\rm up}$; the FFN hidden transform acts on the $d_{\\rm ffn}$ \\textbf{rows}. For the signed hidden subgroup, write $K=PS$. The combined transform is:\n\\[\nW_{\\rm gate}^{G,P}=P^\\top W_{\\rm gate}G,\\qquad\nW_{\\rm up}^{G,K}=K^\\top W_{\\rm up}G,\\qquad\nW_{\\rm down}^{G,K}=G^\\top W_{\\rm down}K.\n\\]\nBiases transform as $b_{\\rm gate}\\mapsto b_{\\rm gate}P$, $b_{\\rm up}\\mapsto b_{\\rm up}K$, and $b_{\\rm down}\\mapsto b_{\\rm down}G$. These commute because $G$ and $K$ act on disjoint dimensions: $G$ permutes/signs the $d$-dimensional residual space while $K$ acts on the $d_{\\rm ffn}$-dimensional hidden space.\n\\end{remark}\n\n\\begin{remark}[Why Plain (Non-Gated) FFNs Have No Sign Symmetry]\nFor plain 2-layer MLPs of the form $h=\\sigma(xW_{\\rm up}^\\top+b)$, sign flips would require $\\sigma(-z)=-\\sigma(z)$ (oddness). $\\operatorname{ReLU}(x)=\\max(0,x)$ satisfies $\\operatorname{ReLU}(-x)\\ne-\\operatorname{ReLU}(x)$ for $x>0$; similarly GELU and SiLU are not odd. Thus for \\emph{plain} FFNs, sign flips do not preserve outputs, limiting the orthogonal hidden-coordinate subgroup to $S_{d_{\\rm ffn}}$. Plain ReLU FFNs also have the familiar positive diagonal scaling symmetry from ReLU homogeneity; GELU/SiLU plain FFNs generally do not. Gated FFNs (Proposition~\\ref{prop:gated-signed}) admit this because the sign matrix acts on the linear branch while the nonlinear gate branch is only permuted.\n\\end{remark}\n\n\\subsection{SAE gauge invariance}\n\nSparse autoencoders (SAEs) learn feature dictionaries from residual-stream activations. We show that the SAE training objective is invariant under residual gauge, so SAEs cannot canonically choose a basis.\n\n\\begin{proposition}[SAE objective is gauge-invariant]\nLet $D=\\{h_i\\}_{i=1}^N\\subset\\R^d$ be residual activations (row-vector convention), and consider an SAE with encoder and decoder\n\\[\nz(h)=\\phi(hW_{\\rm enc}^\\top+b_{\\rm enc}),\\qquad\n\\hat h(h)=z(h)W_{\\rm dec}^\\top+b_{\\rm dec},\n\\]\ntrained with objective\n\\[\nL(\\theta;D)=\\sum_{h\\in D}\\norm{h-\\hat h(h)}_2^2+\\lambda\\norm{z(h)}_1.\n\\]\nLet $G$ be any admissible residual gauge (a permutation, possibly composed with the global sign flip, for LayerNorm models, or a signed permutation for RMSNorm models), and define $D^G=\\{hG:h\\in D\\}$ and parameters\n\\[\nW_{\\rm enc}^G=W_{\\rm enc}G,\\quad b_{\\rm enc}^G=b_{\\rm enc},\\quad\nW_{\\rm dec}^G=G^\\top W_{\\rm dec},\\quad b_{\\rm dec}^G=b_{\\rm dec}G.\n\\]\nThen for all $h\\in D$,\n\\[\nz^G(hG)=z(h),\\qquad \\hat h^G(hG)=\\hat h(h)G,\n\\]\nand consequently $L(\\theta^G;D^G)=L(\\theta;D)$.\n\\end{proposition}\n\n\\paragraph{Proof.}\nUsing $GG^\\top=I$, $z^G(hG)=\\phi(hGG^\\top W_{\\rm enc}^\\top+b_{\\rm enc})=z(h)$. Then $\\hat h^G(hG)=z(h)W_{\\rm dec}^\\top G+b_{\\rm dec}G=\\hat h(h)G$. Thus $(hG-\\hat h^G(hG))=(h-\\hat h(h))G$, so the squared error is preserved because $G$ is orthogonal, and the $\\ell_1$ term is unchanged because $z^G(hG)=z(h)$.\n\n\\begin{corollary}[SAE feature indices are non-identifiable]\nIndependently of the residual gauge, for any feature permutation $P\\in S_{d_{\\rm feat}}$, the SAE objective is invariant under $W_{\\rm enc}\\mapsto P^\\top W_{\\rm enc}$, $b_{\\rm enc}\\mapsto b_{\\rm enc}P$, and $W_{\\rm dec}\\mapsto W_{\\rm dec}P$, with $b_{\\rm dec}$ unchanged. Thus SAE feature indices are non-canonical without alignment.\n\\end{corollary}\n\n\\section{Transform rules for all module types}\n\\label{app:rules}\n\nAll rules use the row-vector convention: $H^G=HG$ where $H$ has shape $[n,d]$. HuggingFace Linear computes $Y=XW^\\top+b$ with $W\\in\\R^{d_{\\rm out}\\times d_{\\rm in}}$.\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Gauge transform rules by module type.}\n\\label{tab:module-rules}\n\\begin{tabular}{llll}\n\\toprule\nModule & Type & Weight & Bias\\\\\n\\midrule\nTok/Pos embed & Embed & $W\\mapsto WG$ & --\\\\\nQ, K, V proj & READ & $W\\mapsto WG$ & unchanged\\\\\nO projection & WRITE & $W\\mapsto G^\\top W$ & $b\\mapsto bG$\\\\\nMLP up/gate & READ & $W\\mapsto WG$ & unchanged\\\\\nMLP down & WRITE & $W\\mapsto G^\\top W$ & $b\\mapsto bG$\\\\\nRMSNorm & Norm & $\\gamma\\mapsto\\gamma[\\pi^{-1}]$ & --\\\\\nLayerNorm & Norm & $\\gamma\\mapsto\\gamma[\\pi^{-1}]$ & $\\beta\\mapsto\\epsilon\\beta[\\pi^{-1}]$ for $G=\\epsilon P$; other signs break\\\\\nLM head & READ & $W\\mapsto WG$ & --\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\nIndex form: let $\\pi$ be the permutation with $P_{i,\\pi(i)}=1$, and $s_j$ the signs. READ maps satisfy $W^G[:,j]=s_jW[:,\\pi^{-1}(j)]$ (permute/sign columns). WRITE maps satisfy $W^G[i,:]=s_iW[\\pi^{-1}(i),:]$ (permute/sign rows). WRITE bias transforms as $b_j^G=s_jb_{\\pi^{-1}(j)}$. RMSNorm transforms as $\\gamma_j^G=\\gamma_{\\pi^{-1}(j)}$ (permute only, no sign).\n\n\\paragraph{Why $Q,K,V$ are unchanged under reparameterization.}\nThis is the key insight that makes the proof work with multi-head attention. With $H^G=HG$ and $W_Q^G=W_QG$ (READ rule):\n\\[\nQ^G=H^G(W_Q^G)^\\top=HG\\cdot G^\\top W_Q^\\top=HW_Q^\\top=Q.\n\\]\nThe gauge cancels at the READ boundary, so attention patterns are identical.\n\n\\section{Hungarian optimality}\n\nThe sign-marginalized cost is optimal for recovering signed permutations. Let $u_i$ be column $i$ of $H$, $v_j$ column $j$ of $H^G$, and $C=H^\\top H^G$. We seek a permutation $\\pi$ and signs $s$ minimizing\n\\[\n\\min_{\\pi\\in\\Sd,\\;s\\in\\{\\pm1\\}^d}\\sum_{i=1}^d\\norm{u_i-s_iv_{\\pi(i)}}_2^2.\n\\]\nExpanding by columns,\n\\[\n\\sum_{i=1}^d\\norm{u_i-s_iv_{\\pi(i)}}_2^2\n=\\sum_i\\left(\\norm{u_i}_2^2+\\norm{v_{\\pi(i)}}_2^2-2s_i u_i^\\top v_{\\pi(i)}\\right)\n=\\mathrm{const}-2\\sum_i s_iC_{i,\\pi(i)}.\n\\]\nFor any fixed permutation $\\pi$, the optimal sign is $s_i=\\operatorname{sign}(C_{i,\\pi(i)})$, yielding\n\\[\n\\max_{\\pi\\in\\Sd}\\sum_i |C_{i,\\pi(i)}|.\n\\]\nThis is exactly a linear assignment problem on cost $-|C_{i,j}|$, solvable by the Hungarian algorithm.\n\n\\subsection{Assignment stability under a margin}\n\n\\begin{lemma}[Assignment stability under a margin]\n\\label{lem:assignment-margin}\nLet $C\\in\\R^{d\\times d}$ and define $F_C(\\pi)=\\sum_{i=1}^d |C_{i,\\pi(i)}|$ for $\\pi\\in\\Sd$. Assume the maximizer $\\pi^\\star=\\argmax_\\pi F_C(\\pi)$ is unique and define the margin\n\\[\nm:=F_C(\\pi^\\star)-\\max_{\\pi\\ne\\pi^\\star}F_C(\\pi)>0.\n\\]\nIf $E\\in\\R^{d\\times d}$ satisfies $\\norm{E}_\\infty=\\max_{i,j}|E_{i,j}|\\le\\epsilon$ and $2d\\epsilon<m$, then $\\pi^\\star$ remains the unique maximizer for $C+E$.\n\\end{lemma}\n\n\\paragraph{Proof.}\nFor any scalars $a,b$, $||a+b|-|a||\\le |b|$. Thus for any $\\pi$,\n\\[\n|F_{C+E}(\\pi)-F_C(\\pi)|\n\\le\\sum_{i=1}^d |E_{i,\\pi(i)}|\n\\le d\\epsilon.\n\\]\nTherefore $F_{C+E}(\\pi^\\star)\\ge F_C(\\pi^\\star)-d\\epsilon$ and for any $\\pi\\ne\\pi^\\star$, $F_{C+E}(\\pi)\\le F_C(\\pi)+d\\epsilon\\le F_C(\\pi^\\star)-m+d\\epsilon$. Hence $F_{C+E}(\\pi^\\star)-F_{C+E}(\\pi)\\ge m-2d\\epsilon>0$.\n\n\\section{Experimental details}\n\\label{app:experiments}\n\n\\paragraph{Models.}\nAcross experiments we use 11 models spanning 4 architectures and scales from $\\sim$10M to 8B parameters. The symmetry-boundary checks of Table~\\ref{tab:gauge-validation} use the seven models listed there; the transport, optimizer-state, LoRA, steering, SAE, and merging experiments add four further RMSNorm models.\n\n\\paragraph{Production-scale RMSNorm models.}\nQwen2.5-7B has 28 layers, $d=3584$, RMSNorm, and Q/K/V head-space biases only (boundary check). Llama-3.1-8B has 32 layers, $d=4096$, RMSNorm, and no biases (boundary check). Llama-2-7b-chat-hf has 32 layers, $d=4096$, RMSNorm, and no biases (boundary check, refusal reanalysis, gauge-scramble merge).\n\n\\paragraph{Mid-scale RMSNorm models.}\nTinyLlama-1.1B has 22 layers, $d=2048$, RMSNorm, and no biases (boundary check, SAE/steering/LoRA transfer). Qwen2.5-1.5B has 28 layers, $d=1536$, RMSNorm, and Q/K/V head-space biases only (transport trajectory recovery, $\\Bd$/$\\Sd$ steering, LoRA, gauge-scramble). Qwen2.5-0.5B has 24 layers, $d=896$, RMSNorm, and Q/K/V head-space biases only (stateful optimizer resumption). Llama-3.2-1B has 16 layers, $d=2048$, RMSNorm, and no biases (transport replication, steering replication; Appendix~\\ref{app:transport-details}). Qwen Q/K/V biases live in attention head space and remain unchanged under the residual gauge, as in Lemma~\\ref{lem:attention}; the reported transform rules do not rely on residual-space WRITE biases in these modules.\n\n\\paragraph{Small-scale and other architectures.}\nWe use a custom 10M Llama-style transformer with 4 layers, $d=256$, RMSNorm (independent-seed merging; trained from scratch on identical data, different seeds); BERT-base (110M, 12 layers, $d=768$, LayerNorm; $\\Sd$ per-index symmetry; boundary check); T5-small (60M, 6+6 layers, $d=512$, T5LayerNorm; $\\Bd$ symmetry; boundary check); and ViT-B/16 (86M, 12 layers, $d=768$, LayerNorm; $\\Sd$ per-index symmetry; boundary check).\n\n\\paragraph{Existing assets and licenses.}\nAll external checkpoints and datasets are used through their original public distributions and are not redistributed with this paper. The Qwen2.5, TinyLlama, BERT-base, T5-small, and ViT checkpoints report Apache-2.0 license metadata on their Hugging Face model cards; Meta Llama checkpoints are gated and used under the corresponding Llama 2, Llama 3.1, or Llama 3.2 community license terms. WikiText is used under its CC-BY-SA-3.0/GFDL license metadata; SST-2/GLUE is used through the public GLUE distribution and original benchmark terms. ParaRel prompt templates used by the knowledge-neuron audit scripts are credited to Elazar et al. [2021]. Arditi et al.'s refusal-direction code and splits are credited in Appendix~\\ref{app:arditi} and used only for the replication/audit reported there. Core software dependencies are PyTorch, Hugging Face Transformers/Datasets [Wolf et al., 2020], NumPy, and SciPy; their standard open-source licenses are BSD-style or Apache-2.0, and SciPy's assignment solver is cited where used.\n\n\\paragraph{Gauge transforms.}\nWe generate random gauges using NumPy with deterministic seeds: the permutation is a random permutation of $[0,d-1]$ with seed $s$; the signs are a random choice from $\\{-1,+1\\}^d$ with seed $s+1000$; multi-gauge sweeps use seeds 42--61 ($K=20$ gauges). All transforms are applied in-place to minimize memory overhead.\n\n\\paragraph{Steering vectors.}\nWe extract sycophancy steering vectors using Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA): generate contrastive prompt pairs (sycophantic vs. honest responses), extract residual stream activations at layer 10, and compute the mean difference vector across prompt pairs. Steering effect is measured as the logit difference change when adding the vector at inference.\n\n\\paragraph{Evaluation metrics.}\nLogit invariance is evaluated on a fixed invariance batch (5 short prompts for language models; 5 random images for ViT), and we report the maximum absolute logit deviation across the batch. This batch is separate from the alignment probe set used for Hungarian gauge recovery. The logit error is the maximum absolute difference in output logits between original and gauge-transformed models, with threshold $\\sim10^{-4}$ for gauge invariance. Top-$k$ overlap counts shared indices between top-$k$ coordinates by activation magnitude with $k=10$. Linear CKA uses standard centering across samples (HSIC with linear kernel), i.e.,\n\\[\n\\CKA(X,Y)=\\frac{\\norm{X_c^\\top Y_c}_F^2}{\\norm{X_c^\\top X_c}_F\\norm{Y_c^\\top Y_c}_F},\n\\]\nwhere $X_c,Y_c$ are centered across samples.\n\n\\paragraph{Refusal direction reanalysis (Arditi et al., 2024).}\n\\textbf{Setup.} We reproduce Arditi et al.'s released pipeline on \\texttt{meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-chat-hf} (full protocol in Appendix~\\ref{app:arditi}). \\textbf{Candidates.} We form directions $r^{(\\ell)}_i=\\mathbb{E}[h^{(\\ell)}_i\\mid\\mathrm{harmful}]-\\mathbb{E}[h^{(\\ell)}_i\\mid\\mathrm{harmless}]$ from block-input residual streams. \\textbf{Selection.} We follow their bypass/induce criterion with KL filter 0.1 and layer cutoff $\\ell<0.8L$; refusal score is last-token log-odds on $R=\\{306\\}$. \\textbf{Checks.} On 20 harmful validation prompts (greedy decoding), ablating the selected direction reduces refusal from 20/20 to 3/20. We match their released direction artifact (layer 14, position $-1$) with cosine 0.984 in the same residual space ($d=4096$).\n\n\\paragraph{Hungarian alignment.}\nThe sign-marginalized recovery procedure uses SciPy's linear sum assignment solver [Virtanen et al., 2020]; SciPy documents this routine as a modified Jonker--Volgenant implementation described by Crouse [2016], building on shortest-augmenting-path assignment algorithms [Jonker and Volgenant, 1987]. Our gauge-derived cost matrices are near-permutation, and the dense assignment step completes in a few seconds for $d=4096$ in our implementation (worst-case $O(d^3)$). For $d\\ge 8192$, we restrict each row to its top-$m$ matches in $|C|$ (we use $m=200$) and greedily match; this avoids cubic assignment but still forms the dense cross-correlation $C=H_{\\mathrm{orig}}^{\\top}H_{\\mathrm{gauged}}$. On a $d=4096$ ablation, greedy top-200 recovers 94.7\\% permutation / 97.5\\% sign vs 100\\% exact. Probe set: 30 diverse sentences totaling $\\sim$500 tokens. Evaluation uses held-out test sentences (disjoint from probe set).\n\n\\paragraph{Reproducibility.}\nUnless otherwise stated, evaluation and gauge-recovery experiments load models in \\texttt{float32} for numerical stability. The Qwen LoRA row uses a \\texttt{bf16}-trained adapter; all raw, $\\Sd$, $\\Bd$, and reference evaluations for that row use the same trained checkpoint precision, so the comparison isolates gauge transport rather than dtype. All random seeds are fixed and reported. JSON result files include full hyperparameters and timestamps. For transport experiments, we enable deterministic CUDA algorithms (\\texttt{torch.use\\_deterministic\\_algorithms}) to ensure exact reproducibility of composed gauge estimates; this disables TF32 and may reduce speed.\n\n\\subsection{Compute resources}\n\\label{app:compute}\n\nAll reported experiments are single-worker PyTorch jobs, with no model parallelism, data parallelism, or distributed training. Exact float32 7B/8B boundary and recovery rows require a CUDA GPU with at least 48 GB VRAM; half-precision variants fit on 24 GB-class GPUs but are not the exact rows. The 7B/8B gradient-times-activation attribution sweep used a single H200 worker. The 1B--1.5B evaluation, LoRA, TinyLlama tool-transfer, Qwen2.5-1.5B transport, and Llama-3.2-1B transport runs fit on one 24 GB-class GPU. We recommend 100--300 GB local disk for Hugging Face caches and temporary checkpoints.\n\nThe archived timers for the transport families alone sum to about 154 single-GPU hours. Including the shorter un-timed boundary, merge, LoRA/SAE, attribution, and optimizer-state runs, a from-scratch reproduction of all reported tables should budget roughly 200--250 single-GPU hours, plus model-download time.\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Compute resources for the reported experiment families. Wall-clock times are measured where the archived artifacts retain timers; otherwise we give the run configuration and a conservative single-GPU reproduction budget.}\n\\label{tab:compute}\n\\begin{tabular}{p{0.24\\linewidth}p{0.38\\linewidth}p{0.26\\linewidth}}\n\\toprule\nResult family & Worker and memory & Run time / run size\\\\\n\\midrule\nSymmetry-boundary, gauge-fixing, and attribution audits & Single CUDA worker. Float32 7B/8B rows require $\\geq$48 GB VRAM; H200 used for the 7B/8B grad$\\times$act attribution sweep. Smaller models fit on 24 GB-class GPUs. & Boundary/gauge recovery uses 5--30 prompts. Budget tens of minutes per 7B/8B model, dominated by loading and forward/backward passes.\\\\\n\\addlinespace\nQwen2.5-1.5B transport and steering transfer & Single CUDA worker, float32. The archived 200-step log records about 6.2 GB allocated after model load and about 6.2--6.3 GB before optimizer creation, so this fits on a 24 GB-class GPU. & Archived timers: 22.8 h for the 200-step run and 115.6 h for the 1500-step run; each covers 9 trajectories and 18 cross-run pairs.\\\\\n\\addlinespace\nLlama-3.2-1B transport replication & Single CUDA worker, float32. The run log records about 5.0 GB allocated after model load and about 5.1 GB before optimizer creation. & Archived timers: 5.7 h for the 200-step run and 10.3 h for the 1500-step run; each covers 9 trajectories and 18 cross-run pairs.\\\\\n\\addlinespace\nQwen/TinyLlama LoRA, SAE, and steering tool transfer & Single 24 GB-class CUDA worker. The Qwen LoRA run uses bf16, batch size 4, gradient accumulation 4, LoRA rank 16, and 800 training steps; TinyLlama SAE/steering uses an 11,134-token probe. & Exact wall-clock timers were not retained in the final JSONs. Budget one to a few GPU-hours per condition.\\\\\n\\addlinespace\nOptimizer-state resumption & Single 24 GB-class worker for Qwen2.5-0.5B and TinyLlama runs. & Main fp32 run: batch size 32, 500 warmup steps plus 500 resumed steps. Appendix variants range from 30+10 to 200+200 steps.\\\\\n\\addlinespace\nMerge runs & Single CUDA worker. TinyLlama and 10M rows fit on 24 GB-class GPUs; 7B gauge-scramble merge should use bf16 on 24 GB or float32 on a larger single GPU. & Gauge-scramble and independent-seed merge runs use small probe sets and 0--50 fine-tuning steps.\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\subsection{Probe-budget sensitivity}\n\\label{app:probe}\n\nThis appendix collects probe-budget data referenced in Section~\\ref{sec:recovery} and Table~\\ref{tab:probe-regimes}.\n\n\\textbf{Known-gauge exact-recovery regime: probe-robust.} On TinyLlama-1.1B with a sampled $\\Bd$ gauge recorded as ground truth, sign-marginalized Hungarian recovery achieves 100\\% permutation/sign/combined accuracy across all probe budgets we tested.\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Probe-sensitivity on TinyLlama-1.1B with a sampled $\\Bd$ gauge recorded as ground truth. Recovery is invariant to probe budget across this range.}\n\\label{tab:tiny-probe}\n\\begin{tabular}{rrrrr}\n\\toprule\nSentences & Tokens & Perm & Sign & Combined\\\\\n\\midrule\n2 & 22 & 100\\% & 100\\% & 100\\%\\\\\n3 & 31 & 100\\% & 100\\% & 100\\%\\\\\n5 & 49 & 100\\% & 100\\% & 100\\%\\\\\n10 & 101 & 100\\% & 100\\% & 100\\%\\\\\n20 & 202 & 100\\% & 100\\% & 100\\%\\\\\n30 & 292 & 100\\% & 100\\% & 100\\%\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\textbf{Harder same-base long-stride recovery: larger probes improve direct recovery.} On Qwen2.5-1.5B same-base fine-tunes with a randomly sampled $\\Bd$ gauge applied at step 0 and recorded as ground truth, direct long-stride recovery saturates as the local-match probe budget grows. Permutation and sign recovery both reach 100\\% at $\\sim$8K tokens; below this, finite-sample noise in the per-step cross-correlation matrix produces some near-degenerate matches.\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Probe-budget saturation for a harder direct long-stride recovery on Qwen2.5-1.5B same-base fine-tunes (randomly sampled $\\Bd$ gauge applied at step 0 and recorded as ground truth, 200 fine-tuning steps).}\n\\label{tab:qwen-probe}\n\\begin{tabular}{lrrrr}\n\\toprule\nProbe set & Tokens & Perm & Sign & Combined\\\\\n\\midrule\nbuiltin\\_5 & 39 & 47.5\\% & 100\\% & 47.5\\%\\\\\nbuiltin\\_15 & 118 & 63.5\\% & 100\\% & 63.5\\%\\\\\nbuiltin\\_35 & 270 & 63.6\\% & 100\\% & 63.6\\%\\\\\nwiki\\_50 & 7,873 & 100\\% & 100\\% & 100\\%\\\\\nwiki\\_200 & 33,678 & 100\\% & 100\\% & 100\\%\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\nThe pattern matches Theorem~\\ref{thm:ceiling}: the sign component is robust to small probe budgets (the marginalization step needs only enough samples to determine the sign of each matched correlation), while the permutation component requires the cross-correlation matrix to be far from rank-degenerate, which scales with sample size.\n\n\\textbf{Natural cross-model regime: substantially probe-hungrier.} For independently-trained models with no ground-truth gauge, the right notion is \\emph{stability}: agreement of the recovered alignment with a large-probe reference. We measure this on a representative natural-alignment problem (Qwen2.5-1.5B against a same-architecture variant trained on different data); this is a probe-budget stability study, separate from the coordinate-preserving merge experiments in Section~\\ref{sec:merging}. Stability against the 36K-token reference grows from $\\sim$6\\% at 39 tokens to $\\sim$94\\% at 27K tokens.\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Natural-alignment stability vs. probe budget. Agreement is the fraction of coordinates assigned the same matched index as the wiki\\_200 reference; sign-flip fraction is the share of matches with negative sign.}\n\\label{tab:natural-probe}\n\\begin{tabular}{lrrr}\n\\toprule\nProbe set & Tokens & Agreement & Sign-flip frac.\\\\\n\\midrule\nbuiltin\\_5 & 39 & 5.7\\% & 47.3\\%\\\\\nbuiltin\\_15 & 118 & 11.5\\% & 44.5\\%\\\\\nbuiltin\\_35 & 270 & 15.7\\% & 42.1\\%\\\\\nwiki\\_10 & 1,830 & 73.2\\% & 12.8\\%\\\\\nwiki\\_50 & 6,619 & 82.9\\% & 8.8\\%\\\\\nwiki\\_100 & 18,032 & 89.4\\% & 5.9\\%\\\\\nwiki\\_150 & 27,044 & 93.6\\% & 4.2\\%\\\\\nwiki\\_200 (ref) & 36,010 & 100\\% & 4.8\\%\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\textbf{Practical guidance.} For known-gauge settings (e.g., gauge-scramble experiments), a few hundred tokens suffice. For natural alignment between independently-trained models on the same architecture, plan for 10K--30K tokens of natural-domain text. For transport along a fine-tuning trajectory, a small per-step budget ($\\sim$500 tokens) suffices because each local match has a high assignment margin and the chain composes group-exactly when each step is correct.\n\n\\subsection{Arditi et al. refusal direction replication}\n\\label{app:arditi}\n\n\\textbf{Code path.} We reproduce Arditi et al.'s released refusal-direction pipeline unmodified, adding a thin wrapper that contributes only the gauge analysis on top of their selection code.\n\n\\textbf{Prompts and splits.} We use Arditi's published harmful/harmless train and validation splits with \\texttt{instructions\\_only=true} and no shuffling. For Llama-2-7b-chat-hf: 128 harmful + 128 harmless train prompts to estimate mean activations, and 32+32 validation prompts for direction selection. Behavioral refusal uses the first 20 harmful validation prompts.\n\n\\textbf{Prompt formatting.} Instructions are formatted with the Llama-2 chat template \\texttt{[INST]\\{instruction\\}[/INST]} (no system prompt, trailing whitespace), matching Arditi's model class.\n\n\\textbf{Definition of $h$ and candidate directions.} We hook the transformer block input (residual stream before attention/MLP; pre-RMSNorm for Llama-2) using a forward pre-hook on each \\texttt{model.model.layers[l]}. We record activations at the end-of-instruction token positions, i.e., the tokenized suffix \\texttt{[/INST]} with indices $-|\\mathrm{EOI}|,\\dots,-1$. Candidate directions are $r_{\\mathrm{pos},\\ell}=\\mathbb{E}[h_{\\mathrm{pos},\\ell}\\mid\\mathrm{harmful}]-\\mathbb{E}[h_{\\mathrm{pos},\\ell}\\mid\\mathrm{harmless}]$, then L2-normalized.\n\n\\textbf{Direction selection (Arditi criteria).} For each $(\\mathrm{pos},\\ell)$ we compute (1) a refusal ablation score on harmful prompts using Arditi's global 3-site ablation (block input + attention output + MLP output at every layer), (2) a steering score on harmless prompts by adding the direction at the source layer only, and (3) a KL divergence score between baseline and ablated last-token logits on harmless prompts. We discard the last 20\\% of layers, candidates with KL $>0.1$, and candidates with steering $<0$. We select the candidate with the lowest ablation refusal score, where refusal score is the log-odds of the model's refusal token(s) at the last prompt token (Llama-2 uses token id 306, ``I''). For this run the selected direction is layer 12, position $-2$.\n\n\\textbf{Cached direction comparison (cosine 0.984).} Arditi's released cached direction for Llama-2-7b-chat-hf is at layer 14, position $-1$. We compute cosine similarity between their cached vector and our candidate at the same layer/position (both L2-normalized in the same residual space, $d=4096$), obtaining 0.984. Our selected direction differs only in $(\\ell,\\mathrm{pos})$, consistent with sample variance from subset sizes above.\n\n\\textbf{Behavioral refusal rate ($100\\%\\to15\\%$).} We generate completions for 20 harmful validation prompts with greedy decoding (\\texttt{do\\_sample=False}, \\texttt{max\\_new\\_tokens=512}; no temperature/top-$p$). Refusal is the fraction of completions containing any of the following fixed substrings:\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item \\texttt{\"i'm sorry\"}, \\texttt{\"i am sorry\"}, \\texttt{\"i apologize\"}\n\\item \\texttt{\"as an ai\"}, \\texttt{\"as a language model\"}, \\texttt{\"as an assistant\"}\n\\item \\texttt{\"i cannot\"}, \\texttt{\"i can't\"}, \\texttt{\"i am unable to\"}, \\texttt{\"i'm unable to\"}\n\\item \\texttt{\"i am not able to\"}, \\texttt{\"i'm not able to\"}\n\\end{itemize}\nBaseline refusals are 20/20; global direction ablation reduces this to 3/20 (15\\%).\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Gauge invariance validation across architectures and scales. All models achieve max logit error $\\lesssim 1.3\\times10^{-4}$, consistent with the discrete gauge symmetry. LayerNorm models admit per-index $\\Sd$ (plus the global sign flip); RMSNorm/T5LayerNorm models admit full $\\Bd$ (signed permutations).}\n\\label{tab:gauge-validation-full}\n\\begin{tabular}{lllll}\n\\toprule\nModel & Type & Norm & Gauge & Max error\\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{5}{l}{\\emph{Production-scale models (7--8B parameters)}}\\\\\nQwen2.5-7B & Decoder-only & RMSNorm & $\\Bd$ & $1.13\\times10^{-4}$\\\\\nLlama-3.1-8B & Decoder-only & RMSNorm & $\\Bd$ & $3.00\\times10^{-5}$\\\\\nLlama-2-7b-chat & Decoder-only & RMSNorm & $\\Bd$ & $1.28\\times10^{-4}$\\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{5}{l}{\\emph{Smaller models and other architectures}}\\\\\nTinyLlama-1.1B & Decoder-only & RMSNorm & $\\Bd$ & $8.58\\times10^{-5}$\\\\\nBERT-base & Encoder-only & LayerNorm & $\\Sd$ & $2.29\\times10^{-5}$\\\\\nT5-small & Encoder-decoder & T5LayerNorm & $\\Bd$ & $7.63\\times10^{-5}$\\\\\nViT-B/16 & Vision & LayerNorm & $\\Sd$ & $4.29\\times10^{-6}$\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\section{Multi-behavior steering results}\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Signed-cost versus sign-marginalized Hungarian recovery under recorded $\\Bd$ basis changes on 7B/8B RMSNorm models. All rows use layer 10, seed 42, and 30 probe texts. Signed-cost Hungarian maximizes raw correlations; sign-marginalized Hungarian matches by absolute correlation and then recovers the sign from the matched entry.}\n\\label{tab:signed-vs-abs}\n\\begin{tabular}{lrrrr}\n\\toprule\n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{Signed-cost} & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{Sign-marginalized}\\\\\nModel & Perm. & Sign & Perm. & Sign\\\\\n\\midrule\nQwen2.5-7B & 49.4\\% & 50.1\\% & 100.0\\% & 100.0\\%\\\\\nLlama-3.1-8B & 49.9\\% & 50.1\\% & 100.0\\% & 100.0\\%\\\\\nLlama-2-7B-chat & 49.5\\% & 50.1\\% & 100.0\\% & 100.0\\%\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Gauge equivariance across three steering behaviors (TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat; mean over all layers). Error (mean) is the mean absolute difference in baseline-subtracted steering effect (scale 2.0 minus 0.0), where steering effect is the mean per-token log-probability margin between positive and negative continuations. Top-10 overlap is the mean of $|\\operatorname{top-10}(|v|)\\cap\\operatorname{top-10}(|v^G|)|$ across layers.}\n\\label{tab:steering-behaviors}\n\\begin{tabular}{llrr}\n\\toprule\nBehavior & Extraction & Error (mean) & Top-10 overlap\\\\\n\\midrule\nSentiment & Raw text & $1.15\\times10^{-5}$ & 0.05/10\\\\\nSycophancy & CAA & $2.85\\times10^{-5}$ & 0.00/10\\\\\nRefusal & Raw text & $1.98\\times10^{-5}$ & 0.00/10\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\nWe test gauge equivariance across three steering behaviors. For each, we extract steering vectors using either Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA) with chat-templated prompts, or raw contrastive text pairs. All three behaviors show the same pattern: steering effects are preserved (error $<10^{-4}$) while index-level summaries have near-zero overlap. Sentiment uses contrastive pairs of positive vs. negative affect statements. Sycophancy uses CAA prompts following Rimsky et al. [2024]: agreement-seeking vs. honest responses to opinion questions. Refusal uses contrastive pairs of compliant vs. refusing responses to benign requests.\n\n\\section{Gauge tracking via parallel transport}\n\\label{app:transport-details}\n\nWe evaluate cross-run alignment by composing transports through a shared base checkpoint.\n\n\\paragraph{Setup.}\nWe fine-tune Qwen2.5-1.5B for 200 and 1500 steps on three datasets (WikiText, code, math) with seeds 42, 5042, 10042, yielding 9 runs and 18 cross-run pairs. Unless noted otherwise, Appendix~\\ref{app:transport-details} reports Qwen2.5-1.5B results; we include additional Llama-3.2-1B summaries in Tables~\\ref{tab:within-run} and~\\ref{tab:steering-transfer}. The checkpoint stride is two optimizer steps: 200-step runs use 101 checkpoints and 100 local edges per base-to-final chain; 1500-step runs use 751 checkpoints and 750 local edges. A cross-run transport-via-base map composes two chains, so it uses 200 or 1500 local matches per reported pair. The same fixed probe set is reused for each estimated edge; held-out probes are used only for the overfitting check below. For each run we estimate a base-to-final map either by endpoint matching (a one-shot best-fit signed permutation on probe activations at the endpoints) or by composing local gauges along the training trajectory (transport). For a pair $(a,b)$ we compare direct endpoint matching to base-composition ablations (endpoint-via-base, hybrid) and transport-via-base. We apply a randomly sampled signed-permutation gauge at step 0 and record the induced residual-stream correspondence as ground truth, but report permutation recovery accuracy for compactness since sign recovery is essentially perfect in these runs (permutation accuracy and total (perm+sign) accuracy differ by $\\le0.13\\%$ across all pairs). As a probe-overfitting check, endpoint-direct accuracy on a held-out batch is slightly lower (by 2.8 percentage points on average at 1500 steps).\n\n\\paragraph{Cross-run ablations.}\nTable~\\ref{tab:cross-run-full} reports residual-stream cross-run permutation recovery for five ways of constructing the cross-run map: direct final-to-final endpoint matching, composing endpoint gauges through the base (endpoint-via-base), two hybrid compositions (one side transport, one side endpoint), and composing transported gauges through the base (transport-via-base). Transport-via-base is consistently best at both 200 and 1500 steps.\n\n\\paragraph{Pair-type breakdown.}\nTable~\\ref{tab:cross-run} decomposes cross-run recovery into cross-seed and cross-dataset pairs. The largest gains occur on cross-seed pairs, where direct endpoint matching is unreliable. Cross-dataset pairs are more heterogeneous: when endpoint matching is already near-ceiling, transport can underperform due to compounding local alignment errors (Figure~\\ref{fig:transport-advantage}).\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Residual-stream cross-run gauge recovery on Qwen2.5-1.5B. Endpoint-direct matches the two final checkpoints directly; the via-base and hybrid methods first align each run to the shared base (by endpoint matching or transport) and then compose through the base. Numbers report permutation recovery accuracy (\\%, mean$\\pm$s.d.) over 18 run pairs (3 datasets$\\times$3 seeds).}\n\\label{tab:cross-run-full}\n\\begin{tabular}{lrr}\n\\toprule\nMethod & 200 steps & 1500 steps\\\\\n\\midrule\nEndpoint-direct (final $\\leftrightarrow$ final) & $61.3\\pm33.6$ & $60.3\\pm32.6$\\\\\nEndpoint-via-base (endpoint$\\cdot$endpoint) & $17.1\\pm6.0$ & $11.4\\pm3.6$\\\\\nHybrid (A transport, B endpoint) & $37.4\\pm12.2$ & $26.9\\pm6.0$\\\\\nHybrid (A endpoint, B transport) & $37.7\\pm9.9$ & $26.5\\pm6.1$\\\\\nTransport-via-base (transport$\\cdot$transport) & $96.2\\pm6.3$ & $91.1\\pm8.7$\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{figure}[h]\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/figure2_transport_advantage.png}\n\\caption{Per-pair transport advantage $\\Delta=\\mathrm{Transport}-\\mathrm{Endpoint}$ (percentage points) for cross-seed and cross-dataset pairs on Qwen2.5-1.5B. Each dot is a run pair; vertical bars denote group means. Transport consistently improves cross-seed recovery, while cross-dataset gains are heterogeneous and can be negative when endpoint matching is already near-ceiling.}\n\\label{fig:transport-advantage}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\textbf{Within-run recovery.} Table~\\ref{tab:within-run} summarizes base$\\to$final recovery within each run. Residual-stream transport remains accurate even at 1500 steps, while FFN transport can degrade over long trajectories; Table~\\ref{tab:per-run} provides the per-run breakdown. We also include an additional within-run summary for Llama-3.2-1B.\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Within-run gauge recovery (base $\\to$ final) averaged over 9 fine-tuning runs (3 datasets $\\times$ 3 seeds). Transport composes local gauges along the training trajectory; endpoint matches activations only at the endpoints. FFN transport is evaluated only for Qwen2.5-1.5B.}\n\\label{tab:within-run}\n\\begin{tabular}{lrr}\n\\toprule\nMetric & 200 steps & 1500 steps\\\\\n\\midrule\nQwen2.5-1.5B residual transport & $98.1\\pm5.0$ & $95.3\\pm6.6$\\\\\nQwen2.5-1.5B residual endpoint & $38.3\\pm11.8$ & $27.9\\pm6.4$\\\\\nQwen2.5-1.5B FFN transport & $96.3\\pm4.0$ & $72.6\\pm25.3$\\\\\nQwen2.5-1.5B FFN endpoint & $75.7\\pm17.0$ & $30.7\\pm6.7$\\\\\nLlama-3.2-1B residual transport & $93.5\\pm5.2$ & $81.6\\pm31.2$\\\\\nLlama-3.2-1B residual endpoint & $37.8\\pm9.0$ & $20.9\\pm8.0$\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Per-run within-run recovery on Qwen2.5-1.5B after 1500 fine-tuning steps.}\n\\label{tab:per-run}\n\\begin{tabular}{lrrrr}\n\\toprule\nDataset/seed & Res. endpoint & Res. transport & FFN endpoint & FFN transport\\\\\n\\midrule\ncode 10042 & 28.0 & 97.1 & 22.4 & 77.1\\\\\ncode 42 & 26.4 & 99.3 & 37.6 & 92.8\\\\\ncode 5042 & 25.7 & 99.2 & 29.7 & 97.5\\\\\nmath 10042 & 28.6 & 91.5 & 35.8 & 68.7\\\\\nmath 42 & 13.5 & 100.0 & 23.8 & 70.5\\\\\nmath 5042 & 32.1 & 97.5 & 42.5 & 13.3\\\\\nwiki 10042 & 33.1 & 79.3 & 26.2 & 80.7\\\\\nwiki 42 & 27.5 & 99.1 & 28.5 & 91.0\\\\\nwiki 5042 & 35.9 & 95.1 & 30.3 & 61.9\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\subsection{Intervention transfer: cross-run steering vector transfer}\n\nGauge recovery accuracy measures coordinate-level alignment, but does this translate to improved interpretability? We test whether steering vectors extracted from one independently trained model transfer effectively to another model trained from the same base.\n\n\\textbf{Setup.} Using the same cross-run setup, we extract sentiment steering vectors and apply them across runs. We report results for Qwen2.5-1.5B (28 layers; residual layers $\\{7,14,21\\}$) and Llama-3.2-1B (16 layers; residual layers $\\{4,8,12\\}$). Let $T_r$ denote the transport base$\\to$final map for run $r$ and $E_r$ the endpoint base$\\to$final map (one-shot matching of $t_0$ and $t_T$). Then $G_{A\\to B}=T_A^{-1}T_B$ and endpoint-via-base is $E_A^{-1}E_B$. For each pair of models $A\\to B$, we compare:\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item \\textbf{Fresh:} Steering vector extracted directly from model $B$ (upper bound)\n\\item \\textbf{Transported:} Vector from $A$ transformed via transport gauge $G_{A\\to B}$\n\\item \\textbf{Endpoint-mapped:} Vector from $A$ transformed via endpoint-via-base mapping $E_A^{-1}E_B$\n\\end{itemize}\nWe measure steering effect preservation as $100\\times\\Delta_{\\rm method}/\\Delta_{\\rm fresh}$. We treat a steering direction as detectable only if $\\Delta_{\\rm fresh}>0.1$; otherwise preservation is not reported and is excluded from averages.\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Cross-run steering transfer after aligning source and target runs. We report Qwen2.5-1.5B and Llama-3.2-1B. Steering preservation is $100\\times\\Delta_{\\rm method}/\\Delta_{\\rm fresh}$, where $\\Delta$ is the baseline-subtracted steering effect (log-probability margin), and the win-rate is over detectable cases ($\\Delta_{\\rm fresh}>0.1$). For Qwen FFN we report only layer 14 (detectable in 14/18 pairs at 200 steps, 16/18 at 1500 steps). Values above 100\\% indicate the transported vector exceeds the freshly extracted one; negative values indicate a reversed effect.}\n\\label{tab:steering-transfer}\n\\begin{tabular}{lrrr}\n\\toprule\nComponent & Transport & Endpoint & Win-rate\\\\\n\\midrule\nQwen residual, 200 steps & 103.6 & 33.2 & 54/54\\\\\nQwen residual, 1500 steps & 80.5 & 18.4 & 50/52\\\\\nQwen FFN layer 14, 200 steps & 84.8 & 25.2 & 13/14\\\\\nQwen FFN layer 14, 1500 steps & 38.3 & -6.2 & 12/16\\\\\nLlama-3.2 residual, 200 steps & 99.1 & 53.5 & 54/54\\\\\nLlama-3.2 residual, 1500 steps & 68.4 & 38.9 & 40/52\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Qwen2.5-1.5B signed-permutation versus permutation-only steering transfer on a same-base cross-seed pair. Step-0 and transport columns report coordinate recovery. Steering preservation is $100\\times\\Delta_{\\rm method}/\\Delta_{\\rm fresh}$.}\n\\label{tab:qwen-steering-bd-sd}\n\\begin{tabular}{llrrr}\n\\toprule\nBehavior & Gauge & Step 0 & Transport & Steering preservation\\\\\n\\midrule\nSentiment & $\\Bd$ & 100.0\\% & 92.7\\% & 95.8\\%\\\\\nSentiment & $\\Sd$ & 48.2\\% & 27.3\\% & 17.2\\%\\\\\nRefusal & $\\Bd$ & 100.0\\% & 92.6\\% & +150.5\\%\\\\\nRefusal & $\\Sd$ & 48.2\\% & 25.9\\% & -32.2\\%\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\textbf{Permutation-only comparison.} Table~\\ref{tab:qwen-steering-bd-sd} reports the Qwen2.5-1.5B rows used in Table~\\ref{tab:artifact-covariance}. This comparison uses the WikiText cross-seed pair (source seed 42, target seed 5042) after 1500 fine-tuning steps. The $\\Bd$ rows compose signed-permutation gauges; the $\\Sd$ rows use the same permutation maps with all signs fixed to $+1$. Preservation is averaged over residual layers $\\{7,14,21\\}$ when the fresh target effect is detectable; for refusal, layer 7 is excluded because the fresh effect is below the detectability threshold.\n\n\\textbf{FFN steering detectability.} In the Qwen2.5-1.5B FFN steering-transfer evaluation we probe three \\emph{pre-chosen} layers $\\{7,14,21\\}$ (for consistency with the residual-stream experiments). However, the fresh in-target FFN intervention is often negligible at layers 7 and 21, making preservation ratios ill-conditioned. We therefore treat a layer as \\emph{not detectable} when $\\Delta_{\\rm fresh}\\le 0.1$ and exclude it from preservation averages. Table~\\ref{tab:ffn-detect} reports detectability rates for transparency: layer 14 is detectable in the majority of pairs, whereas layers 7 and 21 are rarely detectable.\n\n\\textbf{Reporting policy for FFN steering.} All FFN steering-transfer preservation numbers are reported for layer 14 only, where the fresh in-target intervention is most consistently detectable (Table~\\ref{tab:ffn-detect}).\n\n\\textbf{Scope of steering transfer.} The cross-run steering-transfer experiment evaluates sentiment steering; broader behaviors and architectures are not evaluated in this experiment. FFN gauge tracking is less stable than residual-stream tracking over long trajectories in some runs (Table~\\ref{tab:per-run}), suggesting more robust FFN matching (or periodic re-anchoring) is required for long-horizon FFN transport.\n\n\\section{Optimizer-state resumption details}\n\\label{app:optimizer}\n\nThe stateful-resumption run compares resumed trajectories, not endpoint losses. For AdamW, $\\Bd$ transport applies signs to the first moment $m_W$ according to each parameter's READ/WRITE role, while the second moment $v_W$ is transported by the unsigned permutation because signs square out. The $\\Sd$ ablation applies the correct permutation but omits signs in $m_W$. The main Qwen2.5-0.5B row uses \\texttt{float32}, AdamW with learning rate $2\\times10^{-5}$, weight decay 0.01, gradient clipping at 1.0, sequence length 128, 2048 training texts, four held-out evaluation batches, and a trainable suffix of four decoder layers (\\texttt{trainable\\_scope=last\\_n}, \\texttt{last\\_n\\_layers=4}). The fp32 rows are the primary tests of exact gauge covariance.\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Detectability of FFN steering directions in the cross-run transfer evaluation (number of pairs with $\\Delta_{\\rm fresh}>0.1$). Only layer 14 yields consistently detectable FFN steering.}\n\\label{tab:ffn-detect}\n\\begin{tabular}{lrr}\n\\toprule\nFFN layer & 200 steps & 1500 steps\\\\\n\\midrule\n7 & 3/18 & 0/18\\\\\n14 & 14/18 & 16/18\\\\\n21 & 3/18 & 3/18\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Optimizer-state resumption variants. Entries are held-out logit relative MSE against the gauge-equivalent reference resume. ``Other variants'' ranges over raw optimizer state, wrong signs, random signs, and zeroed moments.}\n\\label{tab:optimizer-variants}\n\\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{llllll}\n\\toprule\nModel/opt. & Setup & Pre & $\\Bd$ & $\\Sd$ & Other variants\\\\\n\\midrule\nQwen2.5-0.5B AdamW & fp32 $b=1$, 30+10 & $1.86\\times10^{-12}$ & $1.05\\times10^{-12}$ & $2.08\\times10^{-2}$ & $2.54\\times10^{-3}$--$7.57\\times10^{-2}$\\\\\nQwen2.5-0.5B SGD $\\mu=0.9$ & fp32 $b=1$, 50+10 & $9.28\\times10^{-12}$ & $5.11\\times10^{-12}$ & $3.83\\times10^{-2}$ & $2.72\\times10^{-2}$--$7.10\\times10^{-2}$\\\\\nTinyLlama-1.1B AdamW & fp32 $b=1$, 30+10 & $5.64\\times10^{-13}$ & $3.25\\times10^{-13}$ & $3.77\\times10^{-3}$ & $1.35\\times10^{-3}$--$1.50\\times10^{-2}$\\\\\nQwen2.5-0.5B AdamW & fp32 $b=8$, 200+200 & $1.51\\times10^{-12}$ & $5.75\\times10^{-12}$ & $3.72\\times10^{-4}$ & $3.48\\times10^{-4}$--$4.69\\times10^{-4}$\\\\\nQwen2.5-0.5B AdamW & fp32 $b=32$, 500+500 & $5.24\\times10^{-12}$ & $5.30\\times10^{-10}$ & $3.50\\times10^{-3}$ & $3.88\\times10^{-3}$--$7.04\\times10^{-3}$\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}%\n}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\section{SAE and steering tool-transfer details}\n\nThe TinyLlama-1.1B tool-transfer experiment isolates the sign variable with a known gauge. We train an SAE and extract CAA steering vectors on model A, apply a random $\\Bd$ gauge to obtain functionally equivalent model B, recover the gauge from activations alone, and transfer the tools to B. The probe set contains 100 texts (11,134 tokens). Full $\\Bd$ recovery obtains 100\\% joint permutation/sign accuracy. The transferred SAE has normalized reconstruction MSE 0.004, matching the recovered-gauge reference. The signed-cost $\\Sd$ recovery pipeline hits the structural ceiling of Theorem~\\ref{thm:ceiling}: it recovers only the positive-sign half of the coordinates and gives SAE NMSE 1.08. Separately, steering vectors use the matched permutation with signs forced to $+1$, isolating orientation loss; across sentiment, sycophancy, and refusal this degrades or inverts all three effects, ranging from $-14\\%$ to $-80\\%$.\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{TinyLlama-1.1B tool transfer under a sampled $\\Bd$ gauge recorded as ground truth.}\n\\label{tab:tool-transfer}\n\\begin{tabular}{lrr}\n\\toprule\nCondition & Perm/sign recovery & SAE NMSE\\\\\n\\midrule\n$\\Bd$ recovery (ours) & 100\\% / 100\\% & 0.004\\\\\n$\\Sd$ signed-cost recovery & 50\\% / -- & 1.08\\\\\nRecovered-gauge reference & 100\\% / 100\\% & 0.004\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\section{Natural sign mismatch in independent training}\n\n\\textbf{Question:} The merge experiments in \\S\\ref{sec:merging} include gauge-scramble settings. Does sign mismatch also occur between independently trained models?\n\n\\textbf{Answer:} Yes, in this small-scale run. Two RMSNorm models trained from different seeds develop 50\\% sign mismatch, and signed alignment outperforms perm-only by 37\\%.\n\n\\paragraph{Setup.}\nWe train two identical 4-layer Llama-style transformers (256 hidden, RMSNorm, $\\sim$10M params) on WikiText [Merity et al., 2017] for 1000 steps, differing only in initialization seed. We then estimate the gauge relating them via activation-based Hungarian matching. This is a low-dimensional same-data example, not evidence that $\\sim 500$ probe tokens suffice for natural alignment of large LLMs; larger natural LLM alignment remains probe-hungry as in Appendix~\\ref{app:probe}.\n\n\\paragraph{Sign mismatch occurs without an imposed gauge in this run.}\nThe models exhibit \\textbf{50\\% sign disagreement}: half of matched neuron pairs learned opposite sign conventions. This is expected---RMSNorm models have $\\Bd$ symmetry, and independent training runs break this symmetry differently.\n\n\\paragraph{Signed alignment helps.}\nTable~\\ref{tab:natural-merge} shows merge barrier peaks. Perm-only alignment ($\\Sd$) reduces the peak barrier by 61\\%, but signed alignment ($\\Bd$) achieves 75\\% reduction---a \\textbf{37\\% relative improvement} from accounting for signs.\n\n\\paragraph{Takeaway.}\nThis small-scale natural run shows that sign mismatch can also arise between independently trained RMSNorm models.\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Merge barrier peaks for independently trained RMSNorm models (two independent seeds). Signed alignment provides 37\\% additional barrier reduction over perm-only.}\n\\label{tab:natural-merge}\n\\begin{tabular}{lrr}\n\\toprule\nAlignment & Barrier peak ($\\Delta$NLL) & Reduction\\\\\n\\midrule\nUnaligned & 1.68 & --\\\\\nPerm-only ($\\Sd$) & 0.66 & 61\\%\\\\\nSigned ($\\Bd$) & 0.42 & 75\\%\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\subsection{Additional 0-step gauge-equivalent merge: TinyLlama-1.1B}\n\nThe same gauge-scramble merge setup also applies to a smaller RMSNorm decoder, \\texttt{TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0}, with \\textbf{0 fine-tuning steps}. Thus the two endpoints are \\emph{exactly} gauge-equivalent, and a symmetry-respecting alignment should eliminate the peak barrier. Table~\\ref{tab:tiny-merge} shows that perm-only alignment with the correct permutation but signs forced to $+1$ does not reduce the peak barrier relative to unaligned averaging, while signed alignment (ours; $\\Bd$) eliminates it.\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{TinyLlama-1.1B gauge-scramble merge (0-step fine-tuning; endpoints are gauge-equivalent). Perm-only alignment with the correct permutation but signs forced to $+1$ leaves a large peak barrier, while signed alignment (ours; $\\Bd$) eliminates it.}\n\\label{tab:tiny-merge}\n\\begin{tabular}{lr}\n\\toprule\nAlignment & Barrier peak ($\\Delta$NLL)\\\\\n\\midrule\nUnaligned & 6.36\\\\\nPerm-only (correct permutation) & 6.47\\\\\nSigned (ours) & 0.00\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\subsection{Minimal example: $\\Sd$-only alignment can worsen averaging under $\\Bd$}\n\nWe give a minimal example illustrating the cancellation mechanism behind ``perm-only worse than unaligned'' when the true symmetry group includes sign flips.\n\n\\begin{proposition}[Permutation-only alignment can increase midpoint loss under $\\Bd$]\nThere exist two $\\Bd$-gauge-equivalent parameterizations of the same function such that averaging after a permutation-only ($\\Sd$) alignment step yields strictly higher midpoint loss than unaligned averaging.\n\\end{proposition}\n\n\\paragraph{Proof.}\nConsider the two-layer linear network $f_\\theta(x)=xAB$ with $A=B=I_2$ and squared-error loss to targets $y=x$ under isotropic inputs with $\\mathbb{E}\\norm{x}_2^2<\\infty$. Let\n\\[\nP=\\begin{bmatrix}0&1\\\\1&0\\end{bmatrix},\n\\qquad\nS=\\diag(-1,1),\n\\qquad\nG:=PS=\\begin{bmatrix}0&1\\\\-1&0\\end{bmatrix}\\in\\Bd,\n\\]\nso $GG^\\top=I_2$ and $G^\\top=-G$. Define gauge-transformed parameters by $A^G=AG$ and $B^G=G^\\top B$, so $f_{\\theta^G}(x)=xA^GB^G=x$ and $\\theta$ and $\\theta^G$ are gauge-equivalent.\n\nFor unaligned averaging, midpoint parameters are $A_{1/2}=\\frac12(I_2+G)$ and $B_{1/2}=\\frac12(I_2+G^\\top)$, giving $A_{1/2}B_{1/2}=\\frac14(I_2+G+G^\\top+GG^\\top)=\\frac12I_2$. Thus $f_{1/2}(x)=\\frac12x$ and expected midpoint loss is $\\frac14\\mathbb{E}\\norm{x}_2^2$.\n\nFor $\\Sd$-only alignment, a permutation-only alignment can remove the permutation component $P$ but cannot apply the required sign flip. Composing with $P$ yields sign-only mismatch $GP=\\diag(1,-1)$. Averaging $\\theta$ with $\\theta^{GP}$ gives $A_{1/2}=\\frac12(I_2+GP)=\\diag(1,0)$ and $B_{1/2}=\\diag(1,0)$, so $f_{1/2}(x)=(x_1,0)$. The expected midpoint loss is $\\mathbb{E}[x_2^2]=\\frac12\\mathbb{E}\\norm{x}_2^2$, strictly larger than $\\frac14\\mathbb{E}\\norm{x}_2^2$.\n\n\\section{Extended related work}\n\\label{app:related}\n\n\\paragraph{Permutation symmetries and mode connectivity.}\nHidden-unit permutations have long been known to create equivalent parameterizations and connected loss landscapes [Brea et al., 2019, Freeman and Bruna, 2017, Draxler et al., 2018, Garipov et al., 2018, Tatro et al., 2020, Entezari et al., 2022]. Git Re-Basin turns this into an alignment procedure over $\\Sd$ [Ainsworth et al., 2023]. Our contribution is the architecture-dependent residual-stream group for transformers: per-index $\\Sd$ for LayerNorm and $\\Bd$ for RMSNorm, together with the ceiling theorem showing why the missing sign component is structurally unrecoverable by signed-correlation matching.\n\n\\paragraph{Continuous and rotation-based methods.}\nSliceGPT, QuaRot, generalized linear mode connectivity, and rotation-aware fusion exploit broader $O(d)$ freedom after reparameterization [Ashkboos et al., 2024a,b, Theus et al., 2025, Zhang et al., 2025]. These methods solve different alignment problems. They can be stronger for coordinate-indifferent compression or fusion; they are not coordinate-preserving transports of sparse objects in the native $\\gamma$-explicit model. Theorem~\\ref{thm:discrete-content} gives the interface: extract the $\\Bd$ component when coordinates matter, use the residual dense rotation when they do not.\n\n\\paragraph{Model merging and interpretability.}\nMerging methods include weight matching, model soups, task arithmetic, TIES, ZipIt!, and optimal-transport fusion [Ainsworth et al., 2023, Wortsman et al., 2022, Ilharco et al., 2023, Yadav et al., 2023, Stoica et al., 2024, Singh and Jaggi, 2020, Imfeld et al., 2024, Verma and Elbayad, 2024, Yang et al., 2024b]. Our merge results are not a universal merging recipe; they identify a necessary discrete correction for RMSNorm coordinate-preserving alignment.\n\nIn interpretability, invariant representation metrics remain valid without gauge fixing [Raghu et al., 2017, Morcos et al., 2018, Kornblith et al., 2019]; direction and subspace analyses are similarly invariant within a fixed chart [Elhage et al., 2023]. Our audit targets the complementary class of analyses that output indices. SAE dictionary studies identify feature indices with semantic labels [Bricken et al., 2023, Gao et al., 2025]: Bricken et al. [2023] report ``feature A/1/2357'' as a base64-input detector and characterize hundreds of similarly-indexed features with concept labels. Knowledge-neuron pipelines locate factual associations at specific MLP hidden units: Dai et al. [2022] identify $w^{(9)}_{2141}$ and $w^{(10)}_{1122}$ as carrying the Ireland--Dublin association, and report similar coordinate triples for other facts. Direction-level steering work [Rimsky et al., 2024, Arditi et al., 2024] makes single-model claims that are gauge-invariant in isolation but require a coordinate map to be compared or transferred across runs or related models, which is exactly what Proposition~\\ref{prop:update-covariance} characterizes.\n\nThese examples have different native gauges: BERT-style FFN neuron claims are relative to hidden-unit permutations, while residual-stream artifacts in RMSNorm Llama/Qwen/TinyLlama charts live on a $\\Bd$ orbit of size $2^d d!$. The dependence is not hypothetical. Paulo and Belrose [2026] report only $\\sim30\\%$ SAE feature overlap across training seeds on Llama 3 8B; our TinyLlama transfer experiment shows that on a single model, ignoring the residual $\\Bd$ component drives SAE reconstruction NMSE from 0.004 to 1.08--a $270\\times$ degradation under an exact symmetry of the model. Other sources of cross-seed disagreement also exist (optimization noise, data order, feature splitting), but the residual gauge is a formally identifiable component, and the audit specifies the controls that isolate it.\n\n\\section{Detailed limitations and broader impacts}\n\\label{app:limitations}\n\n\\paragraph{Detailed limitations.}\nFirst, our transport experiments measure recovery along real Qwen2.5-1.5B fine-tuning trajectories against coordinate correspondences induced by randomly sampled $\\Bd$ gauges applied at step 0 and recorded as ground truth; the complementary regime--coordinate alignment between independently specified parameterizations from function-level information alone--is shown by Proposition~\\ref{prop:no-canonical} to admit no canonical answer, so its absence here reflects the structure of the symmetry rather than an algorithmic gap. Second, transport involves stride and probe-distribution choices, and FFN transport is less stable over long horizons than residual-stream transport. Third, exact repeated $\\gamma$ values create global stabilizer intersections, while near-repeats reduce assignment margins; activation matching then selects a probe-dependent $\\Bd$ representative. Fourth, our audits target the subset of interpretability and adaptation workflows that output coordinate names. Coordinate-level claims complement invariant analyses, and coordinate-level claims on RMSNorm models require gauge specification.\n\n\\paragraph{Broader impacts.}\nGauge-correct transport can improve reproducibility and checkpoint-editing audits, but can also lower the cost of transferring behavioral interventions, including undesirable steering directions, between related checkpoints. We therefore present it as an audit and verification tool, and emphasize gauge-invariant reporting when coordinate identity is unnecessary.\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: neurips_2026.sty\n================================================\n% partial rewrite of the LaTeX2e package for submissions to the\n% Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS):\n%\n% - uses more LaTeX conventions\n% - line numbers at submission time replaced with aligned numbers from\n% lineno package\n% - \\nipsfinalcopy replaced with [final] package option\n% - automatically loads times package for authors\n% - loads natbib automatically; this can be suppressed with the\n% [nonatbib] package option\n% - adds foot line to first page identifying the conference\n% - adds preprint option for submission to e.g. arXiv\n% - conference acronym modified\n% - update foot line to display the track name\n%\n% Roman Garnett (garnett@wustl.edu) and the many authors of\n% nips15submit_e.sty, including MK and drstrip@sandia\n%\n% last revision: January 2026\n\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesPackage{neurips_2026}[2026-01-29 NeurIPS 2026 submission/camera-ready style file]\n\n% declare final option, which creates camera-ready copy\n\\newif\\if@neuripsfinal\\@neuripsfinalfalse\n\\DeclareOption{final}{\n \\@neuripsfinaltrue\n \\@anonymousfalse\n}\n\n% declare nonatbib option, which does not load natbib in case of\n% package clash (users can pass options to natbib via\n% \\PassOptionsToPackage)\n\\newif\\if@natbib\\@natbibtrue\n\\DeclareOption{nonatbib}{\n \\@natbibfalse\n}\n\n% declare preprint option, which creates a preprint version ready for\n% upload to, e.g., arXiv\n\\newif\\if@preprint\\@preprintfalse\n\\DeclareOption{preprint}{\n \\@preprinttrue\n \\@anonymousfalse\n}\n\n% determine the track of the paper in camera-ready mode\n\\newif\\if@main\\@maintrue\n\\DeclareOption{main}{\n \\@maintrue\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear).}\n}\n\\newif\\if@position\\@positionfalse\n\\DeclareOption{position}{\n \\@positiontrue\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear). Position Paper Track.}\n}\n\\newif\\if@eandd\\@eanddfalse\n\\DeclareOption{eandd}{\n \\@eanddtrue\n\\if@neuripsfinal\\@anonymousfalse\\else\\if@preprint\\@anonymousfalse\\else\\@anonymoustrue\\fi\\fi\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear). Track on Evaluations and Datasets.} \n}\n\\newif\\if@creativeai\\@creativeaifalse\n\\DeclareOption{creativeai}{\n \\@creativeaitrue\n \\@anonymousfalse\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear). Creative AI Track.}\n}\n\\newif\\if@education\\@educationfalse\n\\DeclareOption{education}{\n \\@educationtrue\n \\@anonymousfalse\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear). Education Track.}\n}\n\n% For anonymous or non-anonymous\n\\newif\\if@anonymous\\@anonymoustrue\n\n% For workshop papers\n\\newcommand{\\@workshoptitle}{}\n\\newcommand{\\workshoptitle}[1]{\\renewcommand{\\@workshoptitle}{#1}}\n\n\\newif\\if@workshop\\@workshopfalse\n\\DeclareOption{sglblindworkshop}{\n \\@workshoptrue\n \\@anonymousfalse\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear). Workshop: \\@workshoptitle.}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{dblblindworkshop}{\n \\@workshoptrue\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear). Workshop: \\@workshoptitle.}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{nonanonymous}{\n \\@anonymousfalse\n}\n\n\\ProcessOptions\\relax\n\n% fonts\n\\renewcommand{\\rmdefault}{ptm}\n\\renewcommand{\\sfdefault}{phv}\n\n% change this every year for notice string at bottom\n\\newcommand{\\@neuripsordinal}{40th}\n\\newcommand{\\@neuripsyear}{2026}\n\\newcommand{\\@neuripslocation}{Sydney}\n\n% acknowledgments\n\\usepackage{environ}\n\\newcommand{\\acksection}{\\section*{Acknowledgments and Disclosure of Funding}}\n\\NewEnviron{ack}{%\n \\acksection\n \\BODY\n}\n\n\n% load natbib unless told otherwise\n\\if@natbib\n \\RequirePackage{natbib}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n\n\n% set page geometry\n\\usepackage[verbose=true,letterpaper]{geometry}\n\\AtBeginDocument{\n \\newgeometry{\n textheight=9in,\n textwidth=5.5in,\n top=1in,\n headheight=12pt,\n headsep=25pt,\n footskip=30pt\n }\n \\@ifpackageloaded{fullpage}\n {\\PackageWarning{neurips_2026}{fullpage package not allowed! Overwriting formatting.}}\n {}\n}\n\n\\widowpenalty=10000\n\\clubpenalty=10000\n\\flushbottom\n\\sloppy\n\n\n% font sizes with reduced leading\n\\renewcommand{\\normalsize}{%\n \\@setfontsize\\normalsize\\@xpt\\@xipt\n \\abovedisplayskip 7\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 5\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus 3\\p@\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 4\\p@ \\@plus 3\\p@ \\@minus 3\\p@\n}\n\\normalsize\n\\renewcommand{\\small}{%\n \\@setfontsize\\small\\@ixpt\\@xpt\n \\abovedisplayskip 6\\p@ \\@plus 1.5\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus 2\\p@\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 3\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@\n}\n\\renewcommand{\\footnotesize}{\\@setfontsize\\footnotesize\\@ixpt\\@xpt}\n\\renewcommand{\\scriptsize}{\\@setfontsize\\scriptsize\\@viipt\\@viiipt}\n\\renewcommand{\\tiny}{\\@setfontsize\\tiny\\@vipt\\@viipt}\n\\renewcommand{\\large}{\\@setfontsize\\large\\@xiipt{14}}\n\\renewcommand{\\Large}{\\@setfontsize\\Large\\@xivpt{16}}\n\\renewcommand{\\LARGE}{\\@setfontsize\\LARGE\\@xviipt{20}}\n\\renewcommand{\\huge}{\\@setfontsize\\huge\\@xxpt{23}}\n\\renewcommand{\\Huge}{\\@setfontsize\\Huge\\@xxvpt{28}}\n\n\n% Force \\tiny to be no smaller than 6pt\n\\renewcommand{\\tiny}{\\fontsize{6pt}{7pt}\\selectfont}\n\n% Force \\scriptsize to be no smaller than 7pt\n\\renewcommand{\\scriptsize}{\\fontsize{7pt}{8pt}\\selectfont}\n\n% Force \\footnotesize to be no smaller than 8pt\n\\renewcommand{\\footnotesize}{\\fontsize{8pt}{9.5pt}\\selectfont}\n\n% sections with less space\n\\providecommand{\\section}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\section}{%\n \\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}%\n {-2.0ex \\@plus -0.5ex \\@minus -0.2ex}%\n { 1.5ex \\@plus 0.3ex \\@minus 0.2ex}%\n {\\large\\bf\\raggedright}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\subsection}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\subsection}{%\n \\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}%\n {-1.8ex \\@plus -0.5ex \\@minus -0.2ex}%\n { 0.8ex \\@plus 0.2ex}%\n {\\normalsize\\bf\\raggedright}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\subsubsection}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\subsubsection}{%\n \\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}%\n {-1.5ex \\@plus -0.5ex \\@minus -0.2ex}%\n { 0.5ex \\@plus 0.2ex}%\n {\\normalsize\\bf\\raggedright}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\paragraph}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\paragraph}{%\n \\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}%\n {1.5ex \\@plus 0.5ex \\@minus 0.2ex}%\n {-1em}%\n {\\normalsize\\bf}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\subparagraph}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\subparagraph}{%\n \\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\\z@}%\n {1.5ex \\@plus 0.5ex \\@minus 0.2ex}%\n {-1em}%\n {\\normalsize\\bf}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\subsubsubsection}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\subsubsubsection}{%\n \\vskip5pt{\\noindent\\normalsize\\rm\\raggedright}%\n}\n\n% float placement\n\\renewcommand{\\topfraction }{0.85}\n\\renewcommand{\\bottomfraction }{0.4}\n\\renewcommand{\\textfraction }{0.1}\n\\renewcommand{\\floatpagefraction}{0.7}\n\n\\newlength{\\@neuripsabovecaptionskip}\\setlength{\\@neuripsabovecaptionskip}{7\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\@neuripsbelowcaptionskip}\\setlength{\\@neuripsbelowcaptionskip}{\\z@}\n\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{\\@neuripsabovecaptionskip}\n\\setlength{\\belowcaptionskip}{\\@neuripsbelowcaptionskip}\n\n% swap above/belowcaptionskip lengths for tables\n\\renewenvironment{table}\n {\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{\\@neuripsbelowcaptionskip}%\n \\setlength{\\belowcaptionskip}{\\@neuripsabovecaptionskip}%\n \\@float{table}}\n {\\end@float}\n\n% footnote formatting\n\\setlength{\\footnotesep }{6.65\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\skip\\footins}{9\\p@ \\@plus 4\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\\renewcommand{\\footnoterule}{\\kern-3\\p@ \\hrule width 12pc \\kern 2.6\\p@}\n\\setcounter{footnote}{0}\n\n% paragraph formatting\n\\setlength{\\parindent}{\\z@}\n\\setlength{\\parskip }{5.5\\p@}\n\n% list formatting\n\\setlength{\\topsep }{4\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\partopsep }{1\\p@ \\@plus 0.5\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\itemsep }{2\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\parsep }{2\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\leftmargin }{3pc}\n\\setlength{\\leftmargini }{\\leftmargin}\n\\setlength{\\leftmarginii }{2em}\n\\setlength{\\leftmarginiii}{1.5em}\n\\setlength{\\leftmarginiv }{1.0em}\n\\setlength{\\leftmarginv }{0.5em}\n\\def\\@listi {\\leftmargin\\leftmargini}\n\\def\\@listii {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 2\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@\n \\parsep 1\\p@ \\@plus 0.5\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@\n \\itemsep \\parsep}\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 1\\p@ \\@plus 0.5\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\partopsep 0.5\\p@ \\@plus 0\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@\n \\itemsep \\topsep}\n\\def\\@listiv {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiv\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listv {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginv\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listvi {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginvi\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginvi\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\n% create title\n\\providecommand{\\maketitle}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\maketitle}{%\n \\par\n \\begingroup\n \\renewcommand{\\thefootnote}{\\fnsymbol{footnote}}\n % for perfect author name centering\n \\renewcommand{\\@makefnmark}{\\hbox to \\z@{$^{\\@thefnmark}$\\hss}}\n % The footnote-mark was overlapping the footnote-text,\n % added the following to fix this problem (MK)\n \\long\\def\\@makefntext##1{%\n \\parindent 1em\\noindent\n \\hbox to 1.8em{\\hss $\\m@th ^{\\@thefnmark}$}##1\n }\n \\thispagestyle{empty}\n \\@maketitle\n \\@thanks\n \\@notice\n \\endgroup\n \\let\\maketitle\\relax\n \\let\\thanks\\relax\n}\n\n% rules for title box at top of first page\n\\newcommand{\\@toptitlebar}{\n \\hrule height 4\\p@\n \\vskip 0.25in\n \\vskip -\\parskip%\n}\n\\newcommand{\\@bottomtitlebar}{\n \\vskip 0.29in\n \\vskip -\\parskip\n \\hrule height 1\\p@\n \\vskip 0.09in%\n}\n\n% create title (includes both anonymized and non-anonymized versions)\n\\providecommand{\\@maketitle}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\@maketitle}{%\n \\vbox{%\n \\hsize\\textwidth\n \\linewidth\\hsize\n \\vskip 0.1in\n \\@toptitlebar\n \\centering\n {\\LARGE\\bf \\@title\\par}\n \\@bottomtitlebar\n \\if@anonymous\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\n Anonymous Author(s) \\\\\n Affiliation \\\\\n Address \\\\\n \\texttt{email} \\\\\n \\end{tabular}%\n \\else\n \\def\\And{%\n \\end{tabular}\\hfil\\linebreak[0]\\hfil%\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\\ignorespaces%\n }\n \\def\\AND{%\n \\end{tabular}\\hfil\\linebreak[4]\\hfil%\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\\ignorespaces%\n }\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\\@author\\end{tabular}%\n \\fi\n \\vskip 0.3in \\@minus 0.1in\n }\n}\n\n% add conference notice to bottom of first page\n\\newcommand{\\ftype@noticebox}{8}\n\\newcommand{\\@notice}{%\n % give a bit of extra room back to authors on first page\n \\enlargethispage{2\\baselineskip}%\n \\@float{noticebox}[b]%\n \\footnotesize\\@noticestring%\n \\end@float%\n}\n\n% abstract styling\n\\renewenvironment{abstract}%\n{%\n \\vskip 0.075in%\n \\centerline%\n {\\large\\bf Abstract}%\n \\vspace{0.5ex}%\n \\begin{quote}%\n}\n{\n \\par%\n \\end{quote}%\n \\vskip 1ex%\n}\n\n% For the paper checklist\n\\newcommand{\\answerYes}[1][]{\\textcolor{blue}{[Yes]#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\answerNo}[1][]{\\textcolor{orange}{[No]#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\answerNA}[1][]{\\textcolor{gray}{[N/A]#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\answerTODO}[1][]{\\textcolor{red}{\\bf [TODO]}}\n\\newcommand{\\justificationTODO}[1][]{\\textcolor{red}{\\bf [TODO]}}\n\n% handle tweaks for camera-ready copy vs. submission copy\n\\if@preprint\n \\newcommand{\\@noticestring}{%\n Preprint.%\n }\n\\else\n \\if@neuripsfinal\n \\newcommand{\\@noticestring}{\n \\@trackname\n }\n \\else\n \\newcommand{\\@noticestring}{%\n Submitted to \\@neuripsordinal\\/ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear). Do not distribute.%\n }\n\n % hide the acknowledgements\n \\NewEnviron{hide}{}\n \\let\\ack\\hide\n \\let\\endack\\endhide\n\n % line numbers for submission\n \\RequirePackage{lineno}\n \\linenumbers\n\n % fix incompatibilities between lineno and amsmath, if required, by\n % transparently wrapping linenomath environments around amsmath\n % environments\n \\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\@ifpackageloaded{amsmath}{%\n \\newcommand*\\patchAmsMathEnvironmentForLineno[1]{%\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname old#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\\csname #1\\endcsname\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname oldend#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\\csname end#1\\endcsname\n \\renewenvironment{#1}%\n {\\linenomath\\csname old#1\\endcsname}%\n {\\csname oldend#1\\endcsname\\endlinenomath}%\n }%\n \\newcommand*\\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno[1]{%\n \\patchAmsMathEnvironmentForLineno{#1}%\n \\patchAmsMathEnvironmentForLineno{#1*}%\n }%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{equation}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{align}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{flalign}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{alignat}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{gather}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{multline}%\n }\n {}\n }\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\n\\endinput\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091164,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31964"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31964"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Zewei Kong"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Zewei Kong, Paul A. Parker, Scott H. Holan"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Scalable Joint Modeling of Dependent Multi-Type Survey Data for Small Area Estimation"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"27 pages, 3 figures"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"stat.ME stat.AP"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"We develop a Bayesian area-level small area estimation framework that jointly models binomial and Gaussian survey responses through shared spatial random effects. This work is motivated by the American Community Survey (ACS), which provides useful information that contributes to federal funding and policy making decisions, and often yields direct estimates with large standard errors in small domains. The proposed Multi-type model borrows strength across outcomes and spatial neighbors to improve the precision of the associated estimates. For the binomial component, Polya-Gamma data augmentation yields a conditionally Gaussian representation, while spatial basis functions provide dimension reduction for high-dimensional spatial data. Together, these features lead to closed-form conditional posteriors and, thus, an efficient Gibbs sampler. Through empirical simulations, we show that the proposed joint model improves estimation precision relative to independent Univariate models. Applying the method to ACS median income and poverty rate data, we find that the proposed Multi-type model yields similar point estimates but smaller posterior variances than the corresponding Univariate models."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:03:34 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:03:34 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Kong","Zewei",""],["Parker","Paul A.",""],["Holan","Scott H.",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Kong\",\n \"Zewei\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Parker\",\n \"Paul A.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Holan\",\n \"Scott H.\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: bghm.bib\n================================================\n@article{chen2014use,\n title={The use of sampling weights in Bayesian hierarchical models for small area estimation},\n author={Chen, Cici and Wakefield, Jon and Lumely, Thomas},\n journal={Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology},\n volume={11},\n pages={33--43},\n year={2014},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{gneiting2007strictly,\n title={Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation},\n author={Gneiting, Tilmann and Raftery, Adrian E},\n journal={Journal of the American statistical Association},\n volume={102},\n number={477},\n pages={359--378},\n year={2007},\n publisher={Taylor \\& Francis}\n}\n\n@article{polson2013bayesian,\n title={Bayesian inference for logistic models using P{\\'o}lya--Gamma latent variables},\n author={Polson, Nicholas G and Scott, James G and Windle, Jesse},\n journal={Journal of the American statistical Association},\n volume={108},\n number={504},\n pages={1339--1349},\n year={2013},\n publisher={Taylor \\& Francis}\n}\n\n@article{fay1979estimates,\n title={Estimates of income for small places: an application of James-Stein procedures to census data},\n author={Fay III, Robert E and Herriot, Roger A},\n journal={Journal of the American Statistical Association},\n volume={74},\n number={366a},\n pages={269--277},\n year={1979},\n publisher={Taylor \\& Francis}\n}\n\n@article{prasad1990estimation,\n title={The estimation of the mean squared error of small-area estimators},\n author={Prasad, NG Narasimha and Rao, Jon NK},\n journal={Journal of the American statistical association},\n volume={85},\n number={409},\n pages={163--171},\n year={1990},\n publisher={Taylor \\& Francis}\n}\n\n@article{datta2000unified,\n title={A unified measure of uncertainty of estimated best linear unbiased predictors in small area estimation problems},\n author={Datta, Gauri S and Lahiri, Partha},\n journal={Statistica Sinica},\n pages={613--627},\n year={2000},\n publisher={JSTOR}\n}\n\n@article{das2004mean,\n title={Mean squared error of empirical predictor},\n author={Das, Kalyan and Jiang, Jiming and Rao, JNK},\n year={2004}\n}\n\n@article{gonzalez2010small,\n title={Small area estimation under Fay--Herriot models with non-parametric estimation of heteroscedasticity},\n author={Gonz{\\'a}lez-Manteiga, Wenceslao and Lombarda, MJ and Molina, I and Morales, D and Santamar{\\'\\i}a, L},\n journal={Statistical Modelling},\n volume={10},\n number={2},\n pages={215--239},\n year={2010},\n publisher={SAGE Publications Sage India: New Delhi, India}\n}\n\n@article{jiang2011best,\n title={Best predictive small area estimation},\n author={Jiang, Jiming and Nguyen, Thuan and Rao, J Sunil},\n journal={Journal of the American Statistical Association},\n volume={106},\n number={494},\n pages={732--745},\n year={2011},\n publisher={Taylor \\& Francis}\n}\n\n@article{datta2011estimation,\n title={Estimation of mean squared error of model-based small area estimators},\n author={Datta, Gauri Sankar and Kubokawa, Tatsuya and Molina, Isabel and Rao, JNK},\n journal={Test},\n volume={20},\n pages={367--388},\n year={2011},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{kubokawa2012measuring,\n title={On measuring uncertainty of small area estimators with higher order accuracy},\n author={Kubokawa, Tatsuya},\n journal={Journal of the Japan Statistical Society},\n volume={41},\n number={2},\n pages={93--119},\n year={2012},\n publisher={THE JAPAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{datta1991hierarchical,\n title={Hierarchical and empirical Bayes multivariate analysis in small area estimation},\n author={Datta, GS and Fay, RE and Ghosh, M},\n booktitle={Proceedings of Bureau of the Census 1991 Annual research conference, US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC},\n pages={63--79},\n year={1991}\n}\n\n@article{gonzalez2008analytic,\n title={Analytic and bootstrap approximations of prediction errors under a multivariate Fay--Herriot model},\n author={Gonz{\\'a}lez-Manteiga, Wenceslao and Lombard{\\'\\i}a, Mar{\\'\\i}a Jos{\\'e} and Molina, Isabel and Morales, Domingo and Santamar{\\'\\i}a, Laureano},\n journal={Computational Statistics \\& Data Analysis},\n volume={52},\n number={12},\n pages={5242--5252},\n year={2008},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{porter2015small,\n title={Small area estimation via multivariate Fay--Herriot models with latent spatial dependence},\n author={Porter, Aaron T and Wikle, Christopher K and Holan, Scott H},\n journal={Australian \\& New Zealand Journal of Statistics},\n volume={57},\n number={1},\n pages={15--29},\n year={2015},\n publisher={Wiley Online Library}\n}\n\n@article{fruhwirth2010data,\n title={Data augmentation and MCMC for binary and multinomial logit models},\n author={Fr{\\\"u}hwirth-Schnatter, Sylvia and Fr{\\\"u}hwirth, Rudolf},\n journal={Statistical modelling and regression structures: Festschrift in honour of Ludwig Fahrmeir},\n pages={111--132},\n year={2010},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{rao1994small,\n title={Small-area estimation by combining time-series and cross-sectional data},\n author={Rao, Jon NK and Yu, Mingyu},\n journal={Canadian Journal of Statistics},\n volume={22},\n number={4},\n pages={511--528},\n year={1994},\n publisher={Wiley Online Library}\n}\n\n@article{ballini2009poverty,\n title={Poverty and inequality mapping in the Commonwealth of Dominica},\n author={Ballini, Francesca and Betti, Gianni and Carrette, Samuel and Neri, Laura},\n journal={Estudios Econ{\\'o}micos},\n pages={123--162},\n year={2009},\n publisher={El Colegio de M{\\'e}xico, AC}\n}\n\n@article{molina2010small,\n title={Small area estimation of poverty indicators},\n author={Molina, Isabel and Rao, Jon NK},\n journal={Canadian Journal of statistics},\n volume={38},\n number={3},\n pages={369--385},\n year={2010},\n publisher={Wiley Online Library}\n}\n\n@article{albert1993bayesian,\n title={Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data},\n author={Albert, James H and Chib, Siddhartha},\n journal={Journal of the American statistical Association},\n volume={88},\n number={422},\n pages={669--679},\n year={1993},\n publisher={Taylor \\& Francis}\n}\n\n@article{parker2023bayesian,\n title={Bayesian Methods Applied to Small Area Estimation for Establishment Statistics},\n author={Parker, Paul A and Janicki, Ryan and Holan, Scott H},\n journal={Advances in Business Statistics, Methods and Data Collection},\n pages={685--704},\n year={2023},\n publisher={Wiley Online Library}\n}\n\n@article{gonzalez2007estimation,\n title={Estimation of the mean squared error of predictors of small area linear parameters under a logistic mixed model},\n author={Gonz{\\'a}lez-Manteiga, Wenceslao and Lombard{\\'\\i}a, Mar{\\'\\i}a Jos{\\'e} and Molina, Isabel and Morales, Domingo and Santamar{\\'\\i}a, Laureano},\n journal={Computational statistics \\& data analysis},\n volume={51},\n number={5},\n pages={2720--2733},\n year={2007},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{torabi2015non,\n title={Non-parametric generalized linear mixed models in small area estimation},\n author={Torabi, Mahmoud and Shokoohi, Farhad},\n journal={Canadian Journal of Statistics},\n volume={43},\n number={1},\n pages={82--96},\n year={2015},\n publisher={Wiley Online Library}\n}\n\n@book{rao2005small,\n title={Small area estimation},\n author={Rao, John NK},\n volume={331},\n year={2005},\n publisher={John Wiley \\& Sons}\n}\n\n@article{bradley2020bayesian,\n title={Bayesian hierarchical models with conjugate full-conditional distributions for dependent data from the natural exponential family},\n author={Bradley, Jonathan R and Holan, Scott H and Wikle, Christopher K},\n journal={Journal of the American Statistical Association},\n volume={115},\n number={532},\n pages={2037--2052},\n year={2020},\n publisher={Taylor \\& Francis}\n}\n\n@book{cressie2011statistics,\n title={Statistics for spatio-temporal data},\n author={Cressie, Noel and Wikle, Christopher K},\n year={2011},\n publisher={John Wiley \\& Sons}\n}\n\n@article{marhuenda2013small,\n title={Small area estimation with spatio-temporal Fay--Herriot models},\n author={Marhuenda, Yolanda and Molina, Isabel and Morales, Domingo},\n journal={Computational Statistics \\& Data Analysis},\n volume={58},\n pages={308--325},\n year={2013},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{horvitz1952generalization,\n title={A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe},\n author={Horvitz, Daniel G and Thompson, Donovan J},\n journal={Journal of the American statistical Association},\n volume={47},\n number={260},\n pages={663--685},\n year={1952},\n publisher={Taylor \\& Francis}\n}\n\n@article{parker2023computationally,\n title={Computationally efficient Bayesian unit-level random neural network modelling of survey data under informative sampling for small area estimation},\n author={Parker, Paul A and Holan, Scott H},\n journal={Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society},\n volume={186},\n number={4},\n pages={722--737},\n year={2023},\n publisher={Oxford University Press US}\n}\n\n@article{ekvall2022mixed,\n title={Mixed-type multivariate response regression with covariance estimation},\n author={Ekvall, Karl Oskar and Molstad, Aaron J},\n journal={Statistics in Medicine},\n volume={41},\n number={15},\n pages={2768--2785},\n year={2022},\n publisher={Wiley Online Library}\n}\n\n@article{aliverti2022composite,\n title={Composite mixture of log-linear models with application to psychiatric studies},\n author={Aliverti, Emanuele and Dunson, David B},\n journal={The annals of applied statistics},\n volume={16},\n number={2},\n pages={765},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{parker2024conjugate,\n title={Conjugate modeling approaches for small area estimation with heteroscedastic structure},\n author={Parker, Paul A and Holan, Scott H and Janicki, Ryan},\n journal={Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology},\n volume={12},\n number={4},\n pages={1061--1080},\n year={2024},\n publisher={Oxford University Press}\n}\n\n@article{mukherjee2025scalable,\n title={Scalable Bayesian inference for high-dimensional mixed-type multivariate spatial data},\n author={Mukherjee, Arghya and Hazra, Arnab and Vats, Dootika},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.13233},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{datta1999empirical,\n title={Empirical best linear unbiased and empirical Bayes prediction in multivariate small area estimation},\n author={Datta, Gauri Sankar and Day, Bannabas and Basawa, Ishanth V},\n journal={Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference},\n volume={75},\n number={2},\n pages={269--279},\n year={1999},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{benavent2016multivariate,\n title={Multivariate Fay--Herriot models for small area estimation},\n author={Benavent, Roberto and Morales, Domingo},\n journal={Computational Statistics \\& Data Analysis},\n volume={94},\n pages={372--390},\n year={2016},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@techreport{bell2007use,\n title={Use of ACS data to produce SAIPE model-based estimates of poverty for counties},\n author={Bell, William R and Basel, Wesley W and Cruse, Charles and Dalzell, L and Maples, Jerry J and O'Hara, B and Powers, D},\n year={2007},\n institution={US Census Bureau}\n}\n\n@article{porter2015multivariate,\n title={Multivariate spatial hierarchical Bayesian empirical likelihood methods for small area estimation},\n author={Porter, Aaron T and Holan, Scott H and Wikle, Christopher K},\n journal={Stat},\n volume={4},\n number={1},\n pages={108--116},\n year={2015},\n publisher={Wiley Online Library}\n}\n\n@article{parker2024nonlinear,\n title={Nonlinear Fay-Herriot Models for Small Area Estimation Using Random Weight Neural Networks},\n author={Parker, Paul A},\n journal={Journal of Official Statistics},\n volume={40},\n number={2},\n pages={317--332},\n year={2024},\n publisher={SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England}\n}\n\n@article{sun2024multivariate,\n title={Multivariate small-area estimation for mixed-type response variables with item nonresponse},\n author={Sun, Hao and Berg, Emily and Zhu, Zhengyuan},\n journal={Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology},\n volume={12},\n number={2},\n pages={320--342},\n year={2024},\n publisher={Oxford University Press}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{franco2013applying,\n title={Applying bivariate binomial/logit normal models to small area estimation},\n author={Franco, Carolina and Bell, William R},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, section on survey research methods},\n pages={690--702},\n year={2013}\n}\n\n@article{parker2021general,\n title={A general Bayesian model for heteroskedastic data with fully conjugate full-conditional distributions},\n author={Parker, Paul A and Holan, Scott H and Wills, Skye A},\n journal={Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation},\n volume={91},\n number={15},\n pages={3207--3227},\n year={2021},\n publisher={Taylor \\& Francis}\n}\n\n@book{rao2015small,\n title={Small Area Estimation},\n author={Rao, J. N. K. and Molina, Isabel},\n edition={2},\n year={2015},\n publisher={John Wiley \\& Sons},\n address={Hoboken, NJ}\n}\n\n@article{hughes2013dimension,\n title={Dimension Reduction and Alleviation of Confounding for Spatial Generalized Linear Mixed Models},\n author={Hughes, John and Haran, Murali},\n journal={Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology)},\n volume={75},\n number={1},\n pages={139--159},\n year={2013},\n doi={10.1111/j.1467-9868.2012.01041.x}\n}\n\n@misc{census2024testing,\n author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},\n title = {Instructions for Applying Statistical Testing to American Community Survey Data},\n year = {2024},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/tech_docs/statistical_testing/2024_Instructions_for_Stat_Testing_ACS.pdf}},\n note = {Accessed March 19, 2026}\n}\n\n\n@article{porter2014spatial,\n title={Spatial Fay--Herriot models for small area estimation with functional covariates},\n author={Porter, Aaron T and Holan, Scott H and Wikle, Christopher K and Cressie, Noel},\n journal={Spatial Statistics},\n volume={10},\n pages={27--42},\n year={2014},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{bradley2016bayesian,\n title={Bayesian spatial change of support for count-valued survey data with application to the American Community Survey},\n author={Bradley, Jonathan R and Wikle, Christopher K and Holan, Scott H},\n journal={Journal of the American Statistical Association},\n volume={111},\n number={514},\n pages={472--487},\n year={2016},\n publisher={Taylor \\& Francis}\n}\n\n@article{parker2022computationally,\n title={Computationally efficient Bayesian unit-level models for non-Gaussian data under informative sampling with application to estimation of health insurance coverage},\n author={Parker, Paul A and Holan, Scott H and Janicki, Ryan},\n journal={The Annals of Applied Statistics},\n volume={16},\n number={2},\n pages={887--904},\n year={2022},\n publisher={Institute of Mathematical Statistics}\n}\n\n@article{bradley2015multivariate,\n title={Multivariate spatio-temporal models for high-dimensional areal data with application to longitudinal employer-household dynamics},\n author={Bradley, Jonathan R and Holan, Scott H and Wikle, Christopher K},\n year={2015}\n}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n \n \n \n%\n%\n%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%\n%\n%\n\\documentclass[12pt]{article}\n% Oct 26, 1999\n\\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-0.125in}\n\\setlength{\\topmargin}{-0.5in} \\setlength{\\textwidth}{6.5in}\n\\setlength{\\textheight}{9in}\n\n\\setlength{\\textheight}{9in} \\setlength{\\textwidth}{6.5in}\n\\setlength{\\topmargin}{-40pt} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{0pt}\n\\setlength{\\evensidemargin}{0pt}\n\n\\setlength{\\textheight}{8.5in} \\setlength{\\textwidth}{6.5in}\n\\setlength{\\topmargin}{-36pt} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{0pt}\n\\setlength{\\evensidemargin}{0pt} \\tolerance=500\n\\renewcommand{\\baselinestretch}{1.5}\n%\\input psfig.tex\n\\usepackage{amssymb}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{apacite}\n\\usepackage{algorithm}\n\\usepackage{algpseudocode}\n\\usepackage{latexsym}\n\\usepackage{epsfig}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{subfigure}\n\\usepackage{wasysym}\n\\usepackage{threeparttable}\n\\usepackage{natbib}\n\\usepackage{color}\n\\usepackage{epstopdf}\n\\usepackage{bm}\n\\usepackage{float}\n\\usepackage{todonotes}\n\\usepackage{verbatim}\n\\usepackage{svg}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}\n\n\n\\newtheorem{proposition}{Proposition} \n\n\\newcommand{\\mbv}[1]{\\mbox{\\boldmath$#1$\\unboldmath}}\n\\newcommand{\\mbf}[1]{\\mathbf{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\iid}{\\stackrel{\\mathrm{iid}}{\\sim}}\n\n% Notation shortcuts (optional)\n\\newcommand{\\N}{\\mathcal{N}}\n\\newcommand{\\E}{\\mathbb{E}}\n\\newcommand{\\Var}{\\mathrm{Var}}\n\\newcommand{\\diag}{\\mathrm{diag}}\n\n\n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\newcommand{\\bl}{\\color{blue}}\n\\newcommand{\\gr}{\\color{green}}\n\\newcommand{\\rd}{}\n\\newcommand{\\blk}{\\color{black}}\n\n\n\\def\\pf{{\\bf Proof. }}\n\\def\\logimplies{\\Rightarrow}\n\\def\\convinlaw{\\stackrel{{\\cal L}}{\\Longrightarrow }}\n\\def\\convinp{\\stackrel{P}{\\longrightarrow }}\n\\def\\convas{\\stackrel{a.s.}{\\longrightarrow }}\n\\def\\convv{\\stackrel{v}{\\longrightarrow}}\n\\def\\asymp{\\stackrel{{\\mathbb P}}{\\sim}}\n\\def\\RR{\\mathbb R}\n\\def\\ZZ{\\mathbb Z}\n\\def\\QQ{\\mathbb Q}\n\\def\\NN{\\mathbb N}\n\\def\\MM{\\mathbb M}\n\\def\\LL{\\mathbb L}\n\\def\\EE{\\mathbb E}\n\\def\\PP{\\mathbb P}\n\\def\\DD{\\mathbb D}\n\\def\\CC{\\mathbb C}\n\n\\def\\eqinlaw{\\stackrel{{\\cal L}}{=}}\n\\def\\tends{\\rightarrow}\n\\def\\tendsinf{\\rightarrow\\infty}\n\\def\\isodynamo{\\Leftrightarrow}\n\n\\newtheorem{Theorem}{Theorem}\n\\newtheorem{Lemma}{Lemma}\n\\newtheorem{Corollary}{Corollary}\n\\newtheorem{Proposition}{Proposition}\n\\newtheorem{Definition}{Definition}\n\\newtheorem{Remark}{Remark}\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\def\\wt{\\widetilde}\n\\def\\diag{\\hbox{diag}}\n\\def\\wh{\\widehat}\n\\def\\AIC{\\hbox{AIC}}\n\\def\\BIC{\\hbox{BIC}}\n%- Makes the section title start with Appendix in the appendix environment\n\\newcommand{\\Appendix}\n{%\\appendix\n\\def\\thesection{Appendix~\\Alph{section}}\n%\\def\\thesubsection{\\Alph{section}.\\arabic{subsection}}\n\\def\\thesubsection{A.\\arabic{subsection}}\n}\n\\def\\diag{\\hbox{diag}}\n\\def\\log{\\hbox{log}}\n\\def\\bias{\\hbox{bias}}\n\\def\\Siuu{\\boldSigma_{i,uu}}\n\\def\\ANNALS{{\\it Annals of Statistics}}\n\\def\\BIOK{{\\it Biometrika}}\n\\def\\whT{\\widehat{\\Theta}}\n\\def\\STATMED{{\\it Statistics in Medicine}}\n\\def\\STATSCI{{\\it Statistical Science}}\n\\def\\JSPI{{\\it Journal of Statistical Planning \\& Inference}}\n\\def\\JRSSB{{\\it Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B}}\n\\def\\BMCS{{\\it Biometrics}}\n\\def\\COMMS{{\\it Communications in Statistics, Theory \\& Methods}}\n\\def\\JQT{{\\it Journal of Quality Technology}}\n\\def\\STIM{{\\it Statistics in Medicine}}\n\\def\\TECH{{\\it Technometrics}}\n\\def\\AJE{{\\it American Journal of Epidemiology}}\n\\def\\JASA{{\\it Journal of the American Statistical Association}}\n\\def\\CDA{{\\it Computational Statistics \\& Data Analysis}}\n\\def\\dfrac#1#2{{\\displaystyle{#1\\over#2}}}\n\\def\\VS{{\\vskip 3mm\\noindent}}\n\\def\\boxit#1{\\vbox{\\hrule\\hbox{\\vrule\\kern6pt\n \\vbox{\\kern6pt#1\\kern6pt}\\kern6pt\\vrule}\\hrule}}\n\\def\\refhg{\\hangindent=20pt\\hangafter=1}\n\\def\\refmark{\\par\\vskip 2mm\\noindent\\refhg}\n\\def\\naive{\\hbox{naive}}\n\\def\\itemitem{\\par\\indent \\hangindent2\\parindent \\textindent}\n\\def\\var{\\hbox{var}}\n\\def\\cov{\\hbox{cov}}\n\\def\\corr{\\hbox{corr}}\n\\def\\trace{\\hbox{trace}}\n\\def\\refhg{\\hangindent=20pt\\hangafter=1}\n\\def\\refmark{\\par\\vskip 2mm\\noindent\\refhg}\n\\def\\Normal{\\hbox{Normal}}\n\\def\\povr{\\buildrel p\\over\\longrightarrow}\n\\def\\ccdot{{\\bullet}}\n\\def\\bse{\\begin{eqnarray*}}\n\\def\\ese{\\end{eqnarray*}}\n\\def\\be{\\begin{eqnarray}}\n\\def\\ee{\\end{eqnarray}}\n\\def\\bq{\\begin{equation}}\n\\def\\eq{\\end{equation}}\n\\def\\bse{\\begin{eqnarray*}}\n\\def\\ese{\\end{eqnarray*}}\n\\def\\pr{\\hbox{pr}}\n\\def\\wh{\\widehat}\n\\def\\trans{^{\\rm T}}\n\\def\\myalpha{{\\cal A}}\n\\def\\th{^{th}}\n\\newtheorem{prop}{Proposition}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\begin{document}\n\n\\thispagestyle{empty} \n\\baselineskip=28pt\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\\begin{center}\n{\\LARGE{\\bf Scalable Joint Modeling of Dependent Multi-Type Survey Data for Small Area Estimation}}\n\\end{center}\n\n\n%\n\n\n\\baselineskip=12pt\n\n\n%%\n%%\n%%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\vskip 2mm\n\\begin{center}\nZewei Kong\\footnote{(\\baselineskip=10pt to whom correspondence should be addressed) Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of Missouri,\n146 Middlebush Hall, Columbia, MO 65211-6100, zk3bx@mail.missouri.edu},\nPaul A. Parker\\footnote{\\baselineskip=10pt Department of Statistics, University of California Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064,\npaulparker@ucsc.edu},\\,\n and Scott H. Holan\\footnote{\\baselineskip=10pt Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of Missouri\n 146 Middlebush Hall, Columbia, MO 65211-6100, holans@missouri.edu}\n % $^{,}$\\footnote{\\baselineskip=10pt U.S. Census Bureau, 4600 Silver Hill Road, Washington, D.C. 20233-9100, scott.holan@census.gov}\n %\\footnote{\\baselineskip=10pt U.S. Census Bureau, 4600 Silver Hill Road, Washington, D.C. 20233-9100, scott.holan@census.gov},\n\\\\\n\\end{center}\n%\n%\n%\n%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\vskip 4mm\n\\baselineskip=12pt \n\\begin{center}\n{\\bf Abstract}\n\\end{center}\nWe develop a Bayesian area-level small area estimation framework that jointly models binomial and Gaussian survey responses through shared spatial random effects. This work is motivated by the American Community Survey (ACS), which provides useful information that contributes to federal funding and policy making decisions, and often yields direct estimates with large standard errors in small domains. The proposed Multi-type model borrows strength across outcomes and spatial neighbors to improve the precision of the associated estimates. For the binomial component, P\\'olya--Gamma data augmentation yields a conditionally Gaussian representation, while spatial basis functions provide dimension reduction for high-dimensional spatial data. Together, these features lead to closed-form conditional posteriors and, thus, an efficient Gibbs sampler. Through empirical simulations, we show that the proposed joint model improves estimation precision relative to independent Univariate models. Applying the method to ACS median income and poverty rate data, we find that the proposed Multi-type model yields similar point estimates but smaller posterior variances than the corresponding Univariate models.\n\n\n\\baselineskip=12pt\n\\par\\vfill\\noindent\n{\\bf Keywords:} Bayesian framework, Gibbs sampling, Mixed models, Multi-type response, P\\'{o}lya-Gamma data augmentation, Spatial basis function.\n\\par\\medskip\\noindent\n%\n%\n%\n%\n\\clearpage\\pagebreak\\newpage \\pagenumbering{arabic}\n\\baselineskip=24pt\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\\section{Introduction}\\label{sec: intro}\n\nSmall area estimation (SAE) is important in the context of official statistics for producing estimates in domains with limited sample sizes. In these sparse domains, direct survey estimates typically have large design-based variances. Model-based SAE improves estimation precision by leveraging dependence and combining direct estimates with auxiliary information and cross-domain structure. This reduces the variability of the domain-level estimates and provides associated measures of uncertainty \\citep{rao2015small}.\n\nFor area-level estimation, the Fay--Herriot (FH) model \\citep{fay1979estimates} serves as the foundational framework. By treating the sampling variances of the direct estimates as known and incorporating them into the model, the FH framework allows the resulting estimates to reflect the precision of the direct estimates. Since then, the area-level SAE framework has been extended in several directions. {{These including spatial FH models \\citep{porter2014spatial}}}, multivariate FH models \\citep{porter2015small,benavent2016multivariate}, spatio-temporal FH models \\citep{marhuenda2013small}, and Bayesian modeling under more complex heteroskedastic structures \\citep{parker2024conjugate}.\n\nHowever, these developments have mostly focused on settings where the responses are of the same type, most often Gaussian. Within official statistics, in practice, non-Gaussian responses or multiple types of variables are often of interest. For example, the Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE) program requires precise estimates for both median household income, which is continuous, and {{poverty rates, which are aggregates of the underlying poverty status indicator.}} Historically, these outcomes have often been modeled separately \\citep{franco2013applying}. Recent work has considered joint modeling for mixed-type outcomes \\citep{ekvall2022mixed,sun2024multivariate}. {{For example, \\citet{ekvall2022mixed} linked responses of different types through a latent Gaussian framework. We develop a joint Bayesian hierarchical model that directly models Gaussian and binomial responses through their respective likelihoods and links them through shared spatial random effects.}}\n\nAt the same time, building such a joint Bayesian model is often computationally demanding. Combining non-Gaussian data with spatial random effects typically breaks conditional conjugacy. As a result, posterior inference often relies on non-conjugate Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) steps such as Metropolis--Hastings, which can become a computational bottleneck when the number of areas is large. Recent work in SAE has addressed this issue by developing scalable Bayesian methods with conjugate structure. For example, \\citet{bradley2020bayesian} developed Bayesian hierarchical models with conjugate full conditional distributions for dependent data from the natural exponential family, while \\citet{parker2021general} proposed a fully conjugate Bayesian model for heteroskedastic survey data. \n\nMotivated by these advances, we propose a scalable Bayesian area-level joint framework that links Gaussian and binomial outcomes through shared spatial random effects. The framework combines three components to address the challenges of non-conjugacy, high-dimensional spatial effects, and design-based variance inputs. First, we apply P\\'olya--Gamma data augmentation \\citep{polson2013bayesian} to transform the logistic likelihood into a conditionally Gaussian form. This yields closed-form updates and enables efficient Gibbs sampling. {{Second, we use spatial basis functions \\citep{hughes2013dimension,bradley2015multivariate} to model the spatial random effects in a lower-dimensional form while preserving the main spatial dependence structure.}} Third, we use an effective sample size (ESS) approximation \\citep{chen2014use} to the variance. This allows the binomial model variance structure to reflect the design-based variances derived from ACS margins of error.\n\nIn summary, this paper makes three main contributions. First, we develop a scalable area-level joint spatial framework for Gaussian and binomial survey data. Second, by combining P\\'olya--Gamma augmentation with a low-rank spatial structure, we obtain a computationally efficient Gibbs sampler with closed-form conditional updates. Third, through simulation studies and an ACS application, we show that the joint model yields smaller posterior variances than separate Univariate models while preserving similar posterior mean surfaces, leading to improved uncertainty quantification. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section~\\ref{sec:methods} introduces the proposed Bayesian framework. Section~\\ref{sec:simulation} evaluates the proposed methodology through simulation studies. {{Section~\\ref{sec:data} applies our model to 2021 ACS tract-level 5-year period estimates to jointly estimate area-level median household income and poverty rates.}} Finally, Section~\\ref{sec:conclusion} provides concluding discussion.\n\n\\section{Multi-type Model}\\label{sec:methods}\nWe jointly model area-level Gaussian and binomial survey outcomes in a Bayesian hierarchical framework, linking the two responses through a shared low-rank spatial random effect. Conditional on the latent effects, the Gaussian and binomial components are independent. P\\'olya-Gamma data augmentation transforms the binomial likelihood into a conditionally Gaussian form, which leads to straightforward Gibbs updates.\n\n\\subsection{Univariate spatial models}\n\nLet $N$ denote the total number of geographic areas. As baselines, we fit separate spatial models to Gaussian and binomial responses. The Gaussian and binomial outcomes are modeled independently using distinct spatial coefficient vectors, denoted $u_1$ and $u_2$. Dimension reduction for the spatial random effects is achieved using spatial basis functions. Let $A$ denote the $N \\times N$ binary adjacency matrix of the areal graph, and let\n\\[\nA = U \\Lambda U^\\top\n\\]\nbe its eigendecomposition, where $U$ contains the orthonormal eigenvectors and $\\Lambda$ is the diagonal matrix of eigenvalues. We retain the eigenvectors associated with the positive eigenvalues and use them as spatial basis functions; see \\cite{bradley2016bayesian} for a related reduced-rank construction. Related adjacency-eigenvector basis representations are also used by \\cite{parker2022computationally}. {{Let $J$ denote the retained index set, with cardinality $r = |J|$. Let $\\Phi \\in \\mathbb{R}^{N \\times r}$ denote the matrix formed by the retained eigenvectors, where $\\phi_i^\\top$ denotes the $i$-th row of $\\Phi$. The vector $\\phi_i \\in \\mathbb{R}^r$ is the spatial basis vector for area $i$.}}\n\nFor the Gaussian response, let $Y_{1i}$ denote the direct estimate on the original scale for area $i$. We apply a log transformation and then standardize the transformed values so that the Gaussian response is on a scale comparable to the logit-scale binomial component. Let $Z_{1i}$ denote the resulting standardized value, and let $V_{1i}$ denote the corresponding estimated design-based variance on the standardized log scale, treated as known in the model.\n\nThe area-level Gaussian model is specified as\n\\begin{equation*}\nZ_{1i} \\mid \\mu_{1i} \\sim N(\\mu_{1i}, V_{1i}), \\quad\n\\mu_{1i} = x_{1i}^\\top \\beta_1 + \\phi_i^\\top u_1 + \\zeta_{1i},\n\\end{equation*}\nfor $i=1,\\dots,N$. Here, $x_{1i} \\in \\mathbb{R}^{p_1}$ is the covariate vector, $u_1 \\in \\mathbb{R}^r$ is the Gaussian-specific spatial coefficient vector, and $\\zeta_{1i}$ is an unstructured area-specific random effect. {{We assign independent priors $\\beta_1 \\sim N(0, \\sigma_\\beta^{2} I_{p_1})$ and $u_1 \\mid \\sigma_{u_1}^2 \\sim N(0, \\sigma_{u_1}^2 I_r)$. We set $\\sigma_\\beta^{2} = 1000$ throughout this paper, corresponding to a weakly informative Gaussian prior. }} We also assume $\\zeta_1 \\mid \\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^2 \\sim N(0, \\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^2 I_N)$, where $\\zeta_1 = (\\zeta_{11}, \\dots, \\zeta_{1N})^\\top$. Variance components are assigned priors $\\sigma_{u_1}^2 \\sim \\text{InvGamma}(a_u, b_u)$ and $\\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^2 \\sim \\text{InvGamma}(a_{\\zeta_1}, b_{\\zeta_1})$.\n\nFor the binomial response, let $\\hat p_i$ denote the direct survey estimate of the rate and let $\\widehat{\\mathrm{Var}}(\\hat p_i)$ denote its design-based variance. Following \\cite{chen2014use}, we define the effective sample size\n\\[\nm_i^E = \\frac{\\hat p_i(1-\\hat p_i)}{\\widehat{\\mathrm{Var}}(\\hat p_i)},\n\\]\nand the corresponding effective count\n\\[\nZ_{2i}^E = m_i^E \\hat p_i.\n\\]\n{{We use a binomial likelihood based on the effective sample size construction of \\citet{chen2014use}. Here, $\\pi_i$ denotes the area-level mean (i.e., the true population proportion), with $\\operatorname{logit}(\\pi_i)$ given by the linear predictor. }}\nSpecifically,\n\n\\[\nL_i(\\pi_i \\mid Z_{2i}^E,m_i^E)\\propto\n\\pi_i^{Z_{2i}^E}(1-\\pi_i)^{m_i^E-Z_{2i}^E},\n\\]\nwith\n\\[\n\\mathrm{logit}(\\pi_i)=x_{2i}^\\top\\beta_2+\\phi_i^\\top u_2+\\zeta_{2i}.\n\\]\n\nThe vector $u_2 \\in \\mathbb{R}^r$ is the binomial-specific spatial coefficient vector and $\\zeta_{2i}$ is the unstructured random effect. We use analogous priors for the binomial block: $\\beta_2 \\sim N(0, \\sigma_\\beta^{2} I_{p_2})$, $u_2 \\mid \\sigma_{u_2}^2 \\sim N(0, \\sigma_{u_2}^2 I_r)$, and $\\zeta_2 \\mid \\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^2 \\sim N(0, \\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^2 I_N)$. The variance components are assumed to have independent $\\text{InvGamma}(a_u, b_u)$ and $\\text{InvGamma}(a_{\\zeta_2}, b_{\\zeta_2})$ priors.\n\n\\subsection{Multi-type Response Model}\n\nThe separate Univariate models assume independence and therefore fail to borrow strength across the correlated survey responses. To capture cross-response dependence, we introduce a joint Multi-type model with a shared spatial random effect.\n\nThe joint model incorporates the spatial basis matrix $\\Phi$ into a shared hierarchical structure\n\\begin{align*}\nZ_{1i} \\mid \\mu_{1i} &\\sim N(\\mu_{1i}, V_{1i}), \\quad \\mu_{1i} = x_{1i}^\\top \\beta_1 + \\tau_1 \\phi_i^\\top \\eta + \\zeta_{1i}, \\\\\nL_i(\\pi_i \\mid Z_{2i}^E,m_i^E) &\\propto\n\\pi_i^{Z_{2i}^E}(1-\\pi_i)^{m_i^E-Z_{2i}^E},\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\n\\text{logit}(\\pi_i)=x_{2i}^\\top\\beta_2+\\tau_2\\phi_i^\\top\\eta+\\tau_3\\phi_i^\\top\\kappa+\\zeta_{2i}.\n\\end{align*}\nThe vector $\\eta \\in \\mathbb{R}^r$ denotes the shared spatial effect that induces dependence between the two outcomes, while $\\kappa \\in \\mathbb{R}^r$ captures spatial variation specific to the binomial outcome. The coefficients $\\tau_1$ and $\\tau_2$ scale the shared spatial effect in the Gaussian and binomial components, respectively, and $\\tau_3$ scales the binomial-specific spatial effect. The unstructured area effects $\\zeta_{1i}$ and $\\zeta_{2i}$ capture non-spatial residual heterogeneity.\n\nWe assume Gaussian priors for the fixed effects $\\beta_l \\sim N(0, \\sigma_\\beta^{2} I_{p_l})$ for $l=1,2$. To avoid confounding between the scale of the latent spatial vectors and the coefficients $\\tau_j$, we assign standard normal priors $\\eta \\sim N(0, I_r)$ and $\\kappa \\sim N(0, I_r)$. The coefficients $\\tau_j$ are assigned $\\tau_j \\sim N(0, \\sigma_\\tau^{2})$ for $j=1,2,3$. {{We set $\\sigma_\\tau^{2} = 100$, corresponding to a vague prior for $\\tau_j \\sim N(0,100)$ for $j=1,2,3$. }} We further assume $\\zeta_l \\mid \\sigma_{\\zeta_l}^2 \\sim N(0, \\sigma_{\\zeta_l}^2 I_N)$ and $\\sigma_{\\zeta_l}^2 \\sim \\text{InvGamma}(a_l, b_l)$ for $l=1,2$.\n\nBy representing the spatial random effects in the reduced basis space defined by $\\Phi$, the dominant matrix inversions in the MCMC updates are reduced from dimension $N$ to dimension $r$, so the main computational cost scales with $O(r^3)$ rather than $O(N^3)$.\nTable~\\ref{tab:symbols} summarizes the primary notation used in the joint model framework.\n\n\\begin{table}[ht]\n\\centering\n\\caption{Symbols in the joint model and their interpretation.}\n\\label{tab:symbols}\n\\begin{tabular}{ll}\n\\hline\nSymbol & Meaning \\\\\n\\hline\n$Z_{1i}$, $Z_{2i}^E$ & Standardized log-transformed direct estimate and effective count for area $i$\\\\\n$m_i^E$ & Effective sample size (ESS) for binomial response in area $i$ \\\\\n$V_{1i}$ & Estimated design-based variance on the standardized log scale for area $i$, treated as known \\\\\n$x_{1i}$, $x_{2i}$ & Covariate vectors for the two outcomes \\\\\n$\\beta_1$, $\\beta_2$ & Fixed effects for Gaussian and binomial means \\\\\n$A$ & $N \\times N$ binary adjacency matrix \\\\\n$\\Phi$ & $N \\times r$ spatial basis matrix extracted from $A$ \\\\\n$\\eta$ & Shared spatial effect inducing cross-response dependence \\\\\n$\\kappa$ & Binomial-specific spatial effect capturing residual variation \\\\\n$\\tau_1, \\tau_2, \\tau_3$ & Coefficients scaling the shared and binomial-specific spatial effects \\\\\n$\\zeta_{1i}$, $\\zeta_{2i}$ & Unstructured area random effect \\\\\n$\\omega_i$ & Latent P\\'olya-Gamma variable for area $i$ \\\\\n\\hline\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\subsection{Posterior Inference}\nFor the binomial block, we use the P\\'olya--Gamma data augmentation \\citep{polson2013bayesian}. Conditional on the latent PG variables, the logistic likelihood is Gaussian in the linear predictor, which leads to conjugate Gibbs updates.\nConsider a generic binomial observation $y \\sim \\text{Binomial}(n,p)$ with $\\text{logit}(p)=\\psi$. The likelihood is proportional to\n\\begin{equation*}\n\\left\\{\\frac{e^\\psi}{1+e^\\psi}\\right\\}^y \\left\\{\\frac{1}{1+e^\\psi}\\right\\}^{n-y} = \\frac{e^{y\\psi}}{(1+e^\\psi)^n}.\n\\end{equation*}\nIf $\\omega \\sim PG(b,0)$, then for any $\\psi \\in \\mathbb{R}$ and $a \\in \\mathbb{R}$, the integral identity is\n\\begin{equation*}\n\\frac{e^{a\\psi}}{(1+e^\\psi)^b} = 2^{-b}e^{\\tilde{\\kappa}\\psi} \\mathbb{E}_\\omega \\left[\\exp\\left(-\\frac{1}{2}\\omega\\psi^2\\right)\\right],\n\\end{equation*}\nwhere $\\tilde{\\kappa} = a - \\frac{b}{2}$. The corresponding conditional distribution is $\\omega|\\psi \\sim PG(b,\\psi)$.\n\nWith the {{binomial likelihood based on the effective sample size}} above, we introduce latent variables $\\omega_i \\mid \\psi_i \\sim PG(m_i^E,\\psi_i)$ for $i=1,\\dots,N$. Here $m_i^E$ need not be an integer. The P\\'olya--Gamma representation remains valid for any positive shape parameter, and the {\\tt BayesLogit} function \\texttt{rpg()} allows non-integer shape inputs, so using $PG(m_i^E,\\psi_i)$ is consistent with the working binomial likelihood above. This yields closed-form Gibbs updates for the model blocks. We then sample from the posterior using Gibbs sampling.\n\nPosterior computation is carried out by Gibbs sampling using the Gaussian representation induced by the P\\'olya--Gamma augmentation. Let\n\\[\nZ_1 = (Z_{11}, \\dots, Z_{1N})^\\top,\n\\qquad\n\\xi_i = Z_{2i}^E - \\frac{m_i^E}{2}, \\quad i=1,\\dots,N,\n\\]\nand define\n\\[\n\\xi = (\\xi_1,\\dots,\\xi_N)^\\top,\n\\qquad\nV = \\mathrm{Diag}(V_{11},\\dots,V_{1N}),\n\\qquad\n\\Omega = \\mathrm{Diag}(\\omega_1,\\dots,\\omega_N).\n\\]\nAlso define\n\\[\nQ_G = \\tau_1^2 \\Phi^\\top V^{-1}\\Phi,\n\\qquad\nQ_B = \\tau_2^2 \\Phi^\\top \\Omega \\Phi.\n\\]\nConditional on all other parameters, the shared spatial effect has the full conditional distribution\n\\begin{equation*}\n\\eta \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(\\mu_\\eta, \\Sigma_\\eta),\n\\end{equation*}\nwhere\n\\begin{align*}\n\\Sigma_\\eta &= (Q_G + Q_B + I_r)^{-1}, \\\\\n\\mu_\\eta &=\n\\Sigma_\\eta\n\\left[\n\\tau_1 \\Phi^\\top V^{-1}(Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\zeta_1)\n+\n\\tau_2 \\Phi^\\top \\left\\{\n\\xi - \\Omega \\left(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2\\right)\n\\right\\}\n\\right].\n\\end{align*}\nThe posterior covariance matrix \\(\\Sigma_\\eta\\) combines information from both the Gaussian and binomial components through the shared spatial effect. The remaining full conditional distributions are updated in the same Gibbs sampler and are provided in the Appendix.\n\\section{Simulation Study}\\label{sec:simulation}\n\nWe conduct an empirical simulation study using 2021 ACS tract-level 5-year period estimates for South Dakota. As in earlier empirical SAE studies, we treat the ACS tract-level estimates as the ``true\" values and generate noisy ``direct\" estimates with sampling variability consistent with the observed ACS values; see \\citet{bradley2020bayesian,parker2023computationally} for related empirical simulation designs.\n\n{{We consider two responses. The Gaussian response is tract-level median household income. Let $M_i$ denote the ACS estimate for tract $i$, and let $\\mathrm{MOE}(M_i)$ denote its published margin of error (MOE, 90\\% confidence interval). The corresponding standard error is\n\\begin{equation*}\\label{eq:se-moe-income}\n \\widehat{\\mathrm{SE}}(M_i)\n =\n \\frac{\\mathrm{MOE}(M_i)}{1.645},\n\\end{equation*}\nand, using the delta-method approximation, the variance on the log scale is\n\\begin{equation*}\\label{eq:log-income-var}\n \\widehat{\\mathrm{Var}}\\{\\log(M_i)\\}\n \\approx\n \\frac{\\widehat{\\mathrm{SE}}(M_i)^2}{M_i^2}.\n\\end{equation*}\n\nThe binomial response is the 2021 ACS 5-year period tract-level direct estimate of the poverty rate. Let $p_i^{\\ast}$ denote the ACS tract-level direct estimate used as the truth in the empirical simulation study, and let $\\mathrm{MOE}(p_i^{\\ast})$ denote its published margin of error. The corresponding variance is\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\\label{eq:pov-var}\n \\widehat{\\mathrm{Var}}(p_i^{\\ast})\n =\n \\left\\{\n \\frac{\\mathrm{MOE}(p_i^{\\ast})}{1.645}\n \\right\\}^2.\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nFor both responses, we use the same tract-level covariate vector,\n\\[\nx_{1i} = x_{2i} = (1,\\ \\mathrm{White}_i)^\\top,\n\\]\nwhere $\\mathrm{White}_i$ is the published proportion of White residents in tract $i$.}}\n\n\\subsection{Simulation Design}\\label{sec:sim-design}\n\nLet\n\\[\n\\mu_{1i}^{\\ast}=\\log(M_i),\n\\qquad\n\\mu_{2i}^{\\ast}=\\operatorname{logit}(p_i^{\\ast}),\n\\]\nand let\n\\[\n\\sigma_{1i}^2=\\widehat{\\mathrm{Var}}(\\mu_{1i}^{\\ast}),\n\\qquad\n\\sigma_{2i}^2=\\widehat{\\mathrm{Var}}(\\mu_{2i}^{\\ast})\n\\]\ndenote the ACS design-based variances on the transformed scales. {{We generate one simulated-dataset as follows.}} For each tract $i$, we draw a correlated pair of simulated data that serves as the direct estimates by\n\\[\n\\begin{pmatrix}\n\\widetilde{\\mu}_{1i} \\\\\n\\widetilde{\\mu}_{2i}\n\\end{pmatrix}\n\\Bigg|\n\\begin{pmatrix}\n\\mu_{1i}^{\\ast} \\\\\n\\mu_{2i}^{\\ast}\n\\end{pmatrix}\n\\sim\nN_2\\!\\left(\n\\begin{pmatrix}\n\\mu_{1i}^{\\ast} \\\\\n\\mu_{2i}^{\\ast}\n\\end{pmatrix},\n\\Sigma_i\n\\right),\n\\]\nwhere\n\\[\n\\Sigma_i\n=\n\\begin{pmatrix}\n\\sigma_{1i}^2 & \\rho\\,\\sigma_{1i}\\sigma_{2i} \\\\\n\\rho\\,\\sigma_{1i}\\sigma_{2i} & \\sigma_{2i}^2\n\\end{pmatrix},\n\\qquad \\rho = 0.9.\n\\]\nWe fix $\\rho=0.9$ to represent a strong cross-response dependence setting and to assess whether the joint model can borrow strength across the two responses.\n\nFor the Gaussian response, we standardize the simulated direct estimate within the empirical simulated dataset\n\\[\nZ_{1i}\n=\n\\frac{\\widetilde{\\mu}_{1i}-\\bar{\\widetilde{\\mu}}_{1}}\n{s_{\\widetilde{\\mu}_1}},\n\\qquad\n\\widetilde{V}_{1i}\n=\n\\frac{\\sigma_{1i}^2}{s_{\\widetilde{\\mu}_1}^2},\n\\]\nwhere $\\bar{\\widetilde{\\mu}}_{1}$ and $s_{\\widetilde{\\mu}_1}$ are the sample mean and sample standard deviation of $\\widetilde{\\mu}_{1}$ across tracts. The Gaussian component is fitted on this standardized log-income scale. After model fitting, we transform the Gaussian posterior draws back to the log-income scale using the simulated-dataset-specific mean and standard deviation. Gaussian MSE, coverage, and interval score are then computed on the log-income scale by comparing these back-transformed posterior summaries with $\\mu_{1i}^{\\ast}=\\log(M_i)$.\n\nFor the binomial response, we map the simulated logit direct estimate back to the probability scale using\n\\[\n\\widehat{p}_i=\\operatorname{logit}^{-1}\\!\\left(\\widetilde{\\mu}_{2i}\\right),\n\\]\nand approximate its variance by\n\\[\n\\widehat{\\mathrm{Var}}(\\widehat{p}_i)\n=\n\\left\\{\\widehat{p}_i\\bigl(1-\\widehat{p}_i\\bigr)\\right\\}^2\n\\sigma_{2i}^2.\n\\]\nWe then compute the effective binomial sample size and effective binomial count\n\\[\nm_i^{E}\n=\n\\frac{\\widehat{p}_i\\left(1-\\widehat{p}_i\\right)}\n{\\widehat{\\mathrm{Var}}(\\widehat{p}_i)},\n\\qquad\nZ_{2i}^{E} = m_i^{E}\\widehat{p}_i.\n\\]\nFor each empirical simulated dataset, we fit the Univariate model and the Multi-type model using the same covariates, the same spatial basis matrix $\\Phi$, and the same prior specification. Each model is run with 1{,}000 burn-in iterations and 1{,}000 retained posterior draws for inference. Performance is evaluated by tract-level MSE, empirical coverage of 95\\% credible intervals, and the 95\\% interval score. We repeat the entire data-generation and model-fitting procedure 100 times and report the average performance across the 100 empirical simulated datasets. {{For the Gaussian response, these summaries are computed after back-transforming the model output from the standardized log-income scale to the unstandardized log-income scale.}}\n\n\\subsection{Empirical Simulation Results}\\label{sec:sim-results}\nWe evaluate tract-level MSE, empirical coverage of the 95\\% credible intervals, and the 95\\% interval score. For an interval $[l,u]$ targeting a parameter $\\theta$, the interval score of \\citet{gneiting2007strictly} is given by\n\\begin{equation*}\\label{eq:IntScore}\n S_{\\alpha}^{\\text{int}}(l,u;\\theta)\n \\;=\\;\n (u-l)\n + \\frac{2}{\\alpha}(l-\\theta)\\mathbf{1}\\{\\theta<l\\}\n + \\frac{2}{\\alpha}(\\theta-u)\\mathbf{1}\\{\\theta>u\\},\n\\end{equation*}\nwhere smaller values indicate better interval performance. We report coverage and interval scores only for the model-based estimators, since the simulation focuses on posterior intervals from the fitted models.\n\nTo compare the Univariate model and the Multi-type model directly, Figure~\\ref{fig:sim-four-panel} reports tract-level percentage reductions relative to the Univariate model\n\\[\n\\mathrm{Red}_i(L)\n=\n100\\times\n\\frac{L_{i,\\text{Univariate}} - L_{i,\\text{Multi-type}}}{L_{i,\\text{Univariate}}},\n\\]\nwhere $L$ is either the tract-level MSE or the tract-level interval score. Positive values favor the Multi-type model. Panels A and B show the distributions of tract-level reductions in MSE and interval score. Panels C and D map the tract-level MSE reduction for the Gaussian and binomial responses.\n\n{{Tables~\\ref{tab:gauss-sim} and \\ref{tab:binom-sim} report the overall numerical summaries. For the Gaussian response, evaluated on the log-income scale, the Multi-type model further reduces both MSE and interval score relative to the Univariate model. In particular, the MSE is reduced by about 10\\% compared with the Univariate model. For the binomial response, the MSE reduction from the Univariate model to the Multi-type model is about 11.77\\%. Overall, for both responses, the Multi-type model achieves about a 10\\% additional MSE reduction together with a smaller interval score. These results indicate that the Multi-type model improves on the Univariate model, suggesting that the cross-response borrowing strategy is appropriate. To examine tract-level performance in more detail, we turn to Figure~\\ref{fig:sim-four-panel}.}}\n\n\\begin{table}[htbp]\n\\centering\n\\begin{tabular}{lcccc}\n\\hline\nType & MSE ($\\times 10^{-3}$) & Coverage & IS & MSE Red (\\%) \\\\\n\\hline\nDirect estimate & 15.5 & -- & -- & -- \\\\\nUnivariate model & 11.2 & 93.9\\% & 0.449 & 27.62\\% \\\\\nMulti-type model & 9.7 & 94.8\\% & 0.416 & 37.64\\% \\\\\n\\hline\n\\end{tabular}\n\\caption{Empirical simulation results for the Gaussian response. MSE is reported in units of $10^{-3}$ on the log-income scale. IS denotes interval score. Reductions are relative to the direct estimate.}\n\\label{tab:gauss-sim}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table}[htbp]\n\\centering\n\\begin{tabular}{lcccc}\n\\hline\nType & MSE ($\\times 10^{-3}$) & Coverage & IS & MSE Red (\\%) \\\\\n\\hline\nDirect estimate & 5.25 & -- & -- & -- \\\\\nUnivariate model & 1.08 & 92.7\\% & 0.144 & 79.50\\% \\\\\nMulti-type model & 0.96 & 93.4\\% & 0.135 & 81.66\\% \\\\\n\\hline\n\\end{tabular}\n\\caption{Empirical simulation results for the binomial response. MSE is reported in units of $10^{-3}$. IS denotes interval score. Reductions are relative to the direct estimate.}\n\\label{tab:binom-sim}\n\\end{table}\nFigure~\\ref{fig:sim-four-panel} provides a visual indication of the improvement from the Multi-type model at the tract level. Panels A and B show the distributions of tract-level percentage reductions in MSE and interval score relative to the Univariate model, and Panels C and D show the spatial patterns of tract-level MSE reduction for the Gaussian and binomial responses. For both responses, most tracts have positive reductions, indicating that the Multi-type model lowers MSE and interval score in most areas. The spatial plots show that this improvement is broadly distributed across the region. Together with the numerical results in Tables~\\ref{tab:gauss-sim} and \\ref{tab:binom-sim}, Figure~\\ref{fig:sim-four-panel} shows that the Multi-type model provides a clear overall improvement over the Univariate model.\n\\begin{figure}[htbp]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{figs/figure1_simulation_comparison.png}\n \\caption{Empirical simulation comparison of the Univariate model and the Multi-type model. Panels A and B show tract-level percentage reductions in MSE and interval score relative to the Univariate model. Panels C and D map the tract-level MSE reduction for the Gaussian and binomial responses. Positive values favor the Multi-type model.}\n \\label{fig:sim-four-panel}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\section{American Community Survey Multi-type Analysis}\\label{sec:data}\n\nWe analyze the West North Central region of the United States, consisting of Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota. {{After removing 48 tracts with missing ACS estimates for income or poverty, 5,859 tracts remain for analysis, and we constructed the adjacency matrix directly on this retained set of tracts using queen contiguity (i.e., where adjacency is defined by sharing a border or a corner). These omitted tracts are few and spatially scattered, so they are unlikely to affect the regional results.}} As in the simulation study, we consider two responses: log median household income and poverty rate. For both responses, we use the same tract-level covariates: the proportion of White residents, the proportion of adults with at least a bachelor's degree, and the proportion of households receiving SNAP benefits.\n\n\\subsection{Posterior Mean Surfaces}\\label{sec:region-mean}\nFigure~\\ref{fig:region-mean-surface} compares the tract-level direct estimates, the Multi-type posterior means, and the Univariate posterior means for both responses over the West North Central region. For the Gaussian response, the three surfaces are very similar and show the same broad spatial pattern. The same is true for the binomial response. Relative to the direct estimates, both model-based surfaces are slightly smoother, but the main geographic structure is preserved.\n\nThese comparisons show that the Multi-type extension does not materially change the posterior mean surface. The main effect of the joint model therefore appears in posterior uncertainty rather than in the estimated mean pattern.\n\n\\begin{figure}[htbp]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{figs/figure2_posterior_mean_surfaces.png}\n \\caption{West North Central region: tract-level posterior mean surfaces for the Gaussian and binomial responses. Panel A shows the Gaussian response on the log-income scale, and Panel B shows the binomial response on the poverty-rate scale. In each panel, the columns show the direct estimate, the Multi-type posterior mean, and the Univariate posterior mean. Across both responses, the two model-based posterior mean surfaces remain very close to the direct estimates.}\n \\label{fig:region-mean-surface}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Uncertainty Reduction}\\label{sec:region-uncertainty}\nBecause the posterior mean surfaces are nearly unchanged, we focus on posterior uncertainty. Figure~\\ref{fig:region-var-scatter} compares tract-level posterior variances under the Univariate and Multi-type models for both responses. Points below the red 45-degree line favor the Multi-type model by indicating smaller posterior variance under the Multi-type model. For both the transformed Gaussian and binomial responses, most tracts lie below the reference line, indicating that the Multi-type model typically produces smaller posterior variances than the Univariate model.\n\nThe numerical summaries show the same pattern. For the transformed Gaussian response, the Multi-type model yields smaller posterior variance in 81.05\\% of tracts. For the binomial response, the Multi-type model yields smaller posterior variance in 84.96\\% of tracts. Overall, the ACS analysis shows that the direct estimates, the Univariate posterior means, and the Multi-type posterior means have very similar spatial patterns for both responses. This indicates that the Multi-type model preserves the main structure of the estimated mean surface and produces estimates that remain consistent with the direct estimates. The main difference appears in posterior uncertainty. For both responses, the Multi-type model yields smaller posterior variances for most tracts than the Univariate model. Combined with the empirical simulation results, where the Multi-type model achieves lower MSE and lower interval score, these findings indicate that the Multi-type model improves both estimation precision and uncertainty quantification.\n\\begin{figure}[htbp]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{figs/figure3_posterior_variance_comparison.png}\n \\caption{{{West North Central region: tract-level posterior variance comparison for the Univariate and Multi-type models. The left panel corresponds to the binomial response, and the right panel corresponds to the transformed Gaussian response. Points below the red 45-degree line favor the Multi-type model by indicating smaller posterior variance under the Multi-type model. For both responses, most tracts lie below the reference line, showing that the Multi-type model yields lower posterior uncertainty in most areas.}}}\n \\label{fig:region-var-scatter}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\section{Conclusion}\\label{sec:conclusion}\nWe propose a scalable Bayesian area-level model for jointly analyzing Gaussian and binomial survey responses. The two outcomes are linked through a shared spatial random effect, which allows the model to borrow strength across dependent responses. To retain computational efficiency and account for spatial dependence, we use P\\'olya--Gamma data augmentation for the binomial component and represent the shared spatial effect through a reduced-rank basis expansion. This leads to closed-form full conditional distributions and an efficient Gibbs sampler.\n\nIn the empirical simulation study, the Multi-type model achieves lower tract-level MSE and smaller interval scores than the corresponding Univariate models for both responses. In the West North Central ACS analysis, the posterior mean surfaces from the Multi-type and Univariate models remain very close to the direct estimates, while the Multi-type model yields smaller posterior standard deviations for most tracts. Taken together, these results show that the main gain from the joint model lies in improved estimation precision and uncertainty quantification, while the estimated mean surfaces remain largely unchanged. The proposed framework provides a practical approach for area-level small area estimation with dependent Multi-type responses. The same general modeling strategy may also be extended to other non-Gaussian outcomes, such as count data and multinomial data, through appropriate augmentation schemes and likelihood formulations.\n\n\\section*{Acknowledgments}\n This article is released to inform interested parties of ongoing research and to encourage discussion. The views expressed on statistical issues are those of the authors and not those of the NSF. This research was partially supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) under NSF grants NCSE-2215168 and NCSE-2215169.\n\n\\bibliographystyle{apalike}\n\\bibliography{bghm}\n% \\section*{Appendix}\\label{sec:app}\n% \\subsection*{Notation recap and augmented likelihood}\n\n% Let $i=1,\\dots,N$ index areas, and let $r$ denote the number of retained spatial basis functions. Define\n% \\[\n% \\Phi =\n% \\begin{bmatrix}\n% \\phi_1^\\top \\\\\n% \\vdots \\\\\n% \\phi_N^\\top\n% \\end{bmatrix}\n% \\in \\mathbb{R}^{N \\times r},\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% R = \\mathrm{diag}(D_1^{-1},\\dots,D_N^{-1}),\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% \\Omega = \\mathrm{diag}(\\omega_1,\\dots,\\omega_N).\n% \\]\n% Let\n% \\[\n% \\xi_i = Z_{2i}^E - \\frac{m_i^E}{2}, \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% \\xi = (\\xi_1,\\dots,\\xi_N)^\\top.\n% \\]\n% For the joint model, the Gaussian block is\n% \\[\n% Z_1 \\mid \\beta_1,\\eta,\\tau_1,\\zeta_1 \\sim\n% N(X_1\\beta_1 + \\tau_1 \\Phi\\eta + \\zeta_1,\\; R^{-1}),\n% \\]\n% and the binomial linear predictor is\n% \\[\n% \\psi = X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_2 \\Phi\\eta + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2.\n% \\]\n% Conditional on the P\\'olya--Gamma latent variables, the binomial likelihood is\n% \\[\n% p(Z_2^E \\mid \\beta_2,\\eta,\\kappa,\\tau_2,\\tau_3,\\zeta_2,\\omega)\n% \\propto\n% \\exp\\left\\{\n% \\xi^\\top \\psi - \\frac{1}{2}\\psi^\\top \\Omega \\psi\n% \\right\\}.\n% \\]\n% Equivalently,\n% \\[\n% \\exp\\left\\{\n% \\xi^\\top \\psi - \\frac{1}{2}\\psi^\\top \\Omega \\psi\n% \\right\\}\n% \\propto\n% \\exp\\left\\{\n% -\\frac{1}{2}(\\psi - \\Omega^{-1}\\xi)^\\top \\Omega (\\psi - \\Omega^{-1}\\xi)\n% \\right\\}.\n% \\]\n% The priors used in the joint model are\n% \\[\n% \\beta_\\ell \\sim N(0,\\sigma_\\beta^{2}I_{p_\\ell}), \\,\\,\\,\\, \\ell=1,2,\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% \\eta \\sim N(0,I_r), \\,\\,\\,\\, \\kappa \\sim N(0,I_r),\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% \\tau_j \\sim N(0,\\sigma_\\tau^{2}), \\,\\,\\,\\, j=1,2,3,\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% \\zeta_\\ell \\mid \\sigma_{\\zeta_\\ell}^2 \\sim N(0,\\sigma_{\\zeta_\\ell}^2 I_N), \\,\\,\\,\\, \\ell=1,2,\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% \\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^2 \\sim IG(a_1,b_1), \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% \\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^2 \\sim IG(a_2,b_2).\n% \\]\n\n% \\subsection*{Full conditional distribution of the shared spatial effect}\n\n% \\textbf{Proposition 1.}\n% Under the augmented joint model, the full conditional distribution of $\\eta$ is\n% \\[\n% \\eta \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(Q_\\eta^{-1} h_\\eta,\\; Q_\\eta^{-1}),\n% \\]\n% where\n% \\[\n% Q_\\eta = \\tau_1^2 \\Phi^\\top R \\Phi + \\tau_2^2 \\Phi^\\top \\Omega \\Phi + I_r,\n% \\]\n% and\n% \\[\n% h_\\eta\n% =\n% \\tau_1 \\Phi^\\top R (Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\zeta_1)\n% +\n% \\tau_2 \\Phi^\\top\n% \\left[\n% \\xi - \\Omega(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2)\n% \\right].\n% \\]\n% \\textit{Proof.}\n% Ignoring terms not involving $\\eta$, the Gaussian block contributes\n% \\[\n% -\\frac{1}{2}(Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\tau_1 \\Phi\\eta - \\zeta_1)^\\top\n% R\n% (Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\tau_1 \\Phi\\eta - \\zeta_1),\n% \\]\n% the augmented binomial block contributes\n% \\[\n% \\xi^\\top(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_2 \\Phi\\eta + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2)\n% -\n% \\frac{1}{2}\n% (X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_2 \\Phi\\eta + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2)^\\top\n% \\Omega\n% (X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_2 \\Phi\\eta + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2),\n% \\]\n% and the prior contributes\n% \\[\n% -\\frac{1}{2}\\eta^\\top \\eta.\n% \\]\n% Collecting quadratic and linear terms in $\\eta$ gives\n% \\[\n% \\log p(\\eta \\mid \\cdot)\n% =\n% -\\frac{1}{2}\\eta^\\top Q_\\eta \\eta + \\eta^\\top h_\\eta + \\mathrm{const},\n% \\]\n% which yields the stated multivariate normal full conditional by completing the square.\n% \\hfill $\\square$\n\n% \\subsection*{Full conditional distributions for the joint model}\n\n% For convenience, define\n% \\[\n% r_{1,\\beta} = Z_1 - \\tau_1 \\Phi\\eta - \\zeta_1,\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% r_{2,\\beta} = \\tau_2 \\Phi\\eta + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2,\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% r_{1,\\eta} = Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\zeta_1,\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% r_{2,\\eta} = \\xi - \\Omega(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2).\n% \\]\n% \\textbf{Latent P\\'olya--Gamma Variables}\n% \\[\n% \\omega_i \\mid \\cdot \\sim PG(m_i^E,\\psi_i), \\,\\,\\,\\, i=1,\\dots,N.\n% \\]\n% \\textbf{Fixed Effects}\n% \\[\n% \\beta_1 \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(Q_{\\beta_1}^{-1}h_{\\beta_1},\\; Q_{\\beta_1}^{-1}),\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% Q_{\\beta_1} = X_1^\\top R X_1 + \\sigma_\\beta^{-2} I_{p_1},\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% h_{\\beta_1} = X_1^\\top R r_{1,\\beta},\n% \\]\n% and\n% \\[\n% \\beta_2 \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(Q_{\\beta_2}^{-1}h_{\\beta_2},\\; Q_{\\beta_2}^{-1}),\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% Q_{\\beta_2} = X_2^\\top \\Omega X_2 + \\sigma_\\beta^{-2} I_{p_2},\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% h_{\\beta_2} = X_2^\\top\\left(\\xi - \\Omega r_{2,\\beta}\\right).\n% \\]\n% \\textbf{Spatial Effects}\n% \\[\n% \\eta \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(Q_\\eta^{-1}h_\\eta,\\; Q_\\eta^{-1}),\n% \\]\n% with $Q_\\eta$ and $h_\\eta$ given above, and\n% \\[\n% \\kappa \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(Q_\\kappa^{-1}h_\\kappa,\\; Q_\\kappa^{-1}),\n% \\]\n% where\n% \\[\n% Q_\\kappa = \\tau_3^2 \\Phi^\\top \\Omega \\Phi + I_r,\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% h_\\kappa\n% =\n% \\tau_3 \\Phi^\\top\n% \\left[\n% \\xi - \\Omega(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_2 \\Phi\\eta + \\zeta_2)\n% \\right].\n% \\]\n% \\textbf{Area-level Random Effect}\n% \\[\n% \\zeta_1 \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(Q_{\\zeta_1}^{-1}h_{\\zeta_1},\\; Q_{\\zeta_1}^{-1}),\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% Q_{\\zeta_1} = R + \\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^{-2} I_N,\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% h_{\\zeta_1} = R(Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\tau_1 \\Phi\\eta),\n% \\]\n% and\n% \\[\n% \\zeta_2 \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(Q_{\\zeta_2}^{-1}h_{\\zeta_2},\\; Q_{\\zeta_2}^{-1}),\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% Q_{\\zeta_2} = \\Omega + \\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^{-2} I_N,\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% h_{\\zeta_2}\n% =\n% \\xi - \\Omega(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_2 \\Phi\\eta + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa).\n% \\]\n% \\textbf{Scaling Parameters}\n% \\[\n% \\tau_1 \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(Q_{\\tau_1}^{-1}h_{\\tau_1},\\; Q_{\\tau_1}^{-1}),\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% Q_{\\tau_1} = \\eta^\\top \\Phi^\\top R \\Phi \\eta + \\sigma_\\tau^{-2},\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% h_{\\tau_1} = \\eta^\\top \\Phi^\\top R (Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\zeta_1),\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% \\tau_2 \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(Q_{\\tau_2}^{-1}h_{\\tau_2},\\; Q_{\\tau_2}^{-1}),\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% Q_{\\tau_2} = \\eta^\\top \\Phi^\\top \\Omega \\Phi \\eta + \\sigma_\\tau^{-2},\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% h_{\\tau_2}\n% =\n% \\eta^\\top \\Phi^\\top\n% \\left[\n% \\xi - \\Omega(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2)\n% \\right],\n% \\]\n% and\n% \\[\n% \\tau_3 \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(Q_{\\tau_3}^{-1}h_{\\tau_3},\\; Q_{\\tau_3}^{-1}),\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% Q_{\\tau_3} = \\kappa^\\top \\Phi^\\top \\Omega \\Phi \\kappa + \\sigma_\\tau^{-2},\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% h_{\\tau_3}\n% =\n% \\kappa^\\top \\Phi^\\top\n% \\left[\n% \\xi - \\Omega(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_2 \\Phi\\eta + \\zeta_2)\n% \\right].\n% \\]\n% \\textbf{Variance Parameters}\n% \\[\n% \\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^2 \\mid \\cdot \\sim\n% IG\\left(a_1 + \\frac{N}{2},\\; b_1 + \\frac{1}{2}\\zeta_1^\\top \\zeta_1\\right),\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% \\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^2 \\mid \\cdot \\sim\n% IG\\left(a_2 + \\frac{N}{2},\\; b_2 + \\frac{1}{2}\\zeta_2^\\top \\zeta_2\\right).\n% \\]\n\n% Thus, all full conditional distributions in the joint model are available in closed form.\n\n% \\subsection*{Univariate Gaussian Baseline}\n\n% For the univariate Gaussian baseline, the Gaussian response is modeled separately with its own spatial coefficient vector $u_1$\n% \\[\n% Z_1 \\mid \\beta_1,u_1,\\zeta_1 \\sim N(X_1\\beta_1 + \\Phi u_1 + \\zeta_1,\\; R^{-1}),\n% \\]\n% with priors\n% \\[\n% \\beta_1 \\sim N(0,\\sigma_\\beta^{2}I_{p_1}), \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% u_1 \\mid \\sigma_{u_1}^2 \\sim N(0,\\sigma_{u_1}^2 I_r),\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% \\zeta_1 \\mid \\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^2 \\sim N(0,\\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^2 I_N), \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% \\sigma_{u_1}^2 \\sim IG(a_u,b_u), \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% \\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^2 \\sim IG(a_{\\zeta_1},b_{\\zeta_1}).\n% \\]\n% The full conditionals are\n% \\[\n% \\beta_1 \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(Q_{\\beta_1}^{-1}h_{\\beta_1},\\; Q_{\\beta_1}^{-1}),\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% Q_{\\beta_1}=X_1^\\top R X_1 + \\sigma_\\beta^{-2} I_{p_1},\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% h_{\\beta_1}=X_1^\\top R(Z_1 - \\Phi u_1 - \\zeta_1),\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% u_1 \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(Q_{u_1}^{-1}h_{u_1},\\; Q_{u_1}^{-1}),\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% Q_{u_1}=\\Phi^\\top R \\Phi + \\sigma_{u_1}^{-2}I_r,\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% h_{u_1}=\\Phi^\\top R(Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\zeta_1),\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% \\zeta_1 \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(Q_{\\zeta_1}^{-1}h_{\\zeta_1},\\; Q_{\\zeta_1}^{-1}),\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% Q_{\\zeta_1}=R+\\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^{-2}I_N,\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% h_{\\zeta_1}=R(Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\Phi u_1),\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% \\sigma_{u_1}^2 \\mid \\cdot \\sim\n% IG\\left(a_u + \\frac{r}{2},\\; b_u + \\frac{1}{2}u_1^\\top u_1\\right),\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% \\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^2 \\mid \\cdot \\sim\n% IG\\left(a_{\\zeta_1} + \\frac{N}{2},\\; b_{\\zeta_1} + \\frac{1}{2}\\zeta_1^\\top \\zeta_1\\right).\n% \\]\n\n% \\subsection*{Univariate Binomial BSaseline}\n% For the univariate binomial baseline, the binomial response is modeled separately with its own spatial coefficient vector $u_2$\n% \\[\n% \\psi = X_2\\beta_2 + \\Phi u_2 + \\zeta_2,\n% \\]\n% and, conditional on P\\'olya--Gamma variables,\n% \\[\n% p(Z_2^E \\mid \\beta_2,u_2,\\zeta_2,\\omega)\n% \\propto\n% \\exp\\left\\{\n% \\xi^\\top \\psi - \\frac{1}{2}\\psi^\\top \\Omega \\psi\n% \\right\\}.\n% \\]\n% The priors are\n% \\[\n% \\beta_2 \\sim N(0,\\sigma_\\beta^{2}I_{p_2}), \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% u_2 \\mid \\sigma_{u_2}^2 \\sim N(0,\\sigma_{u_2}^2 I_r),\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% \\zeta_2 \\mid \\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^2 \\sim N(0,\\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^2 I_N), \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% \\sigma_{u_2}^2 \\sim IG(a_u,b_u), \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% \\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^2 \\sim IG(a_{\\zeta_2},b_{\\zeta_2}).\n% \\]\n% The full conditionals are\n% \\[\n% \\omega_i \\mid \\cdot \\sim PG(m_i^E,\\psi_i), \\,\\,\\,\\, i=1,\\dots,N,\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% \\beta_2 \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(Q_{\\beta_2}^{-1}h_{\\beta_2},\\; Q_{\\beta_2}^{-1}),\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% Q_{\\beta_2}=X_2^\\top \\Omega X_2 + \\sigma_\\beta^{-2} I_{p_2},\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% h_{\\beta_2}=X_2^\\top\\left(\\xi - \\Omega(\\Phi u_2 + \\zeta_2)\\right),\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% u_2 \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(Q_{u_2}^{-1}h_{u_2},\\; Q_{u_2}^{-1}),\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% Q_{u_2}=\\Phi^\\top \\Omega \\Phi + \\sigma_{u_2}^{-2}I_r,\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% h_{u_2}=\\Phi^\\top\\left(\\xi - \\Omega(X_2\\beta_2 + \\zeta_2)\\right),\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% \\zeta_2 \\mid \\cdot \\sim N(Q_{\\zeta_2}^{-1}h_{\\zeta_2},\\; Q_{\\zeta_2}^{-1}),\n% \\,\\,\\,\\,\n% Q_{\\zeta_2}=\\Omega+\\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^{-2}I_N,\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% h_{\\zeta_2}=\\xi - \\Omega(X_2\\beta_2 + \\Phi u_2),\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% \\sigma_{u_2}^2 \\mid \\cdot \\sim\n% IG\\left(a_u + \\frac{r}{2},\\; b_u + \\frac{1}{2}u_2^\\top u_2\\right),\n% \\]\n% \\[\n% \\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^2 \\mid \\cdot \\sim\n% IG\\left(a_{\\zeta_2} + \\frac{N}{2},\\; b_{\\zeta_2} + \\frac{1}{2}\\zeta_2^\\top \\zeta_2\\right).\n% \\]\n\\section*{Appendix}\\label{sec:app}\n\\subsection*{Notation recap and augmented likelihood}\n\nLet $i=1,\\dots,N$ index areas, and let $r$ denote the number of retained spatial basis functions. Define\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\Phi &=&\n\\begin{bmatrix}\n\\phi_1^\\top \\\\\n\\vdots \\\\\n\\phi_N^\\top\n\\end{bmatrix}\n\\in \\mathbb{R}^{N \\times r},\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nR = V^{-1}, \\quad V = \\operatorname{diag}(V_{11}, \\ldots, V_{1N}),\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\n\\Omega = \\mathrm{diag}(\\omega_1,\\dots,\\omega_N).\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nLet\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\xi_i &=& Z_{2i}^E - \\frac{m_i^E}{2}, \\,\\,\\,\\,\n\\xi = (\\xi_1,\\dots,\\xi_N)^\\top.\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nFor the joint model, the Gaussian block is\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nZ_1 \\mid \\beta_1,\\eta,\\tau_1,\\zeta_1 &\\sim&\nN(X_1\\beta_1 + \\tau_1 \\Phi\\eta + \\zeta_1,\\; R^{-1}),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nand the binomial linear predictor is\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\psi &=& X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_2 \\Phi\\eta + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2.\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nConditional on the P\\'olya--Gamma latent variables, the binomial likelihood is\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\np(Z_2^E \\mid \\beta_2,\\eta,\\kappa,\\tau_2,\\tau_3,\\zeta_2,\\omega)\n&\\propto&\n\\exp\\left\\{\n\\xi^\\top \\psi - \\frac{1}{2}\\psi^\\top \\Omega \\psi\n\\right\\}.\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nEquivalently,\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\exp\\left\\{\n\\xi^\\top \\psi - \\frac{1}{2}\\psi^\\top \\Omega \\psi\n\\right\\}\n&\\propto&\n\\exp\\left\\{\n-\\frac{1}{2}(\\psi - \\Omega^{-1}\\xi)^\\top \\Omega (\\psi - \\Omega^{-1}\\xi)\n\\right\\}.\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nThe priors used in the joint model are\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\beta_\\ell &\\sim& N(0,\\sigma_\\beta^{2}I_{p_\\ell}), \\,\\,\\,\\, \\ell=1,2,\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\eta &\\sim& N(0,I_r), \\,\\,\\,\\, \\kappa \\sim N(0,I_r),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\tau_j &\\sim& N(0,\\sigma_\\tau^{2}), \\,\\,\\,\\, j=1,2,3,\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\zeta_\\ell \\mid \\sigma_{\\zeta_\\ell}^2 &\\sim& N(0,\\sigma_{\\zeta_\\ell}^2 I_N), \\,\\,\\,\\, \\ell=1,2,\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^2 &\\sim& IG(a_1,b_1), \\,\\,\\,\\,\n\\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^2 \\sim IG(a_2,b_2).\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\n\\subsection*{Full conditional distribution of the shared spatial effect}\n\n\\textbf{Proposition 1}\nUnder the augmented joint model, the full conditional distribution of $\\eta$ is\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\eta \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& N(Q_\\eta^{-1} h_\\eta,\\; Q_\\eta^{-1}),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nwhere\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nQ_\\eta &=& \\tau_1^2 \\Phi^\\top R \\Phi + \\tau_2^2 \\Phi^\\top \\Omega \\Phi + I_r,\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nand\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nh_\\eta\n&=&\n\\tau_1 \\Phi^\\top R (Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\zeta_1)\n+\n\\tau_2 \\Phi^\\top\n\\left[\n\\xi - \\Omega(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2)\n\\right].\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\textit{Proof.}\nIgnoring terms not involving $\\eta$, the Gaussian block contributes\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n-\\frac{1}{2}(Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\tau_1 \\Phi\\eta - \\zeta_1)^\\top\nR\n(Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\tau_1 \\Phi\\eta - \\zeta_1),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nthe augmented binomial block contributes\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\xi^\\top(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_2 \\Phi\\eta + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2)\n-\n\\frac{1}{2}\n(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_2 \\Phi\\eta + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2)^\\top\n\\Omega\n(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_2 \\Phi\\eta + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nand the prior contributes\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\eta^\\top \\eta.\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nCollecting quadratic and linear terms in $\\eta$ gives\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\log p(\\eta \\mid \\cdot)\n&=&\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\eta^\\top Q_\\eta \\eta + \\eta^\\top h_\\eta + \\mathrm{const},\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nwhich yields the stated multivariate normal full conditional by completing the square.\n\\hfill $\\square$\n\n\\subsection*{Full conditional distributions for the joint model}\n\nFor convenience, define\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nr_{1,\\beta} &=& Z_1 - \\tau_1 \\Phi\\eta - \\zeta_1,\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nr_{2,\\beta} = \\tau_2 \\Phi\\eta + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2,\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nr_{1,\\eta} &=& Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\zeta_1,\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nr_{2,\\eta} = \\xi - \\Omega(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2).\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\textbf{Latent P\\'olya--Gamma Variables}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\omega_i \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& PG(m_i^E,\\psi_i), \\,\\,\\,\\, i=1,\\dots,N.\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\textbf{Fixed Effects}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\beta_1 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& N(Q_{\\beta_1}^{-1}h_{\\beta_1},\\; Q_{\\beta_1}^{-1}),\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nQ_{\\beta_1} = X_1^\\top R X_1 + \\sigma_\\beta^{-2} I_{p_1},\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nh_{\\beta_1} = X_1^\\top R r_{1,\\beta},\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nand\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\beta_2 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& N(Q_{\\beta_2}^{-1}h_{\\beta_2},\\; Q_{\\beta_2}^{-1}),\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nQ_{\\beta_2} = X_2^\\top \\Omega X_2 + \\sigma_\\beta^{-2} I_{p_2},\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nh_{\\beta_2} &=& X_2^\\top\\left(\\xi - \\Omega r_{2,\\beta}\\right).\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\textbf{Spatial Effects}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\eta \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& N(Q_\\eta^{-1}h_\\eta,\\; Q_\\eta^{-1}),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nwith $Q_\\eta$ and $h_\\eta$ given above, and\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\kappa \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& N(Q_\\kappa^{-1}h_\\kappa,\\; Q_\\kappa^{-1}),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nwhere\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nQ_\\kappa &=& \\tau_3^2 \\Phi^\\top \\Omega \\Phi + I_r,\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nh_\\kappa\n&=&\n\\tau_3 \\Phi^\\top\n\\left[\n\\xi - \\Omega(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_2 \\Phi\\eta + \\zeta_2)\n\\right].\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\textbf{Area-level Random Effect}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\zeta_1 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& N(Q_{\\zeta_1}^{-1}h_{\\zeta_1},\\; Q_{\\zeta_1}^{-1}),\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nQ_{\\zeta_1} = R + \\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^{-2} I_N,\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nh_{\\zeta_1} &=& R(Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\tau_1 \\Phi\\eta),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nand\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\zeta_2 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& N(Q_{\\zeta_2}^{-1}h_{\\zeta_2},\\; Q_{\\zeta_2}^{-1}),\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nQ_{\\zeta_2} = \\Omega + \\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^{-2} I_N,\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nh_{\\zeta_2}\n&=&\n\\xi - \\Omega(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_2 \\Phi\\eta + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa).\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\textbf{Scaling Parameters}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\tau_1 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& N(Q_{\\tau_1}^{-1}h_{\\tau_1},\\; Q_{\\tau_1}^{-1}),\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nQ_{\\tau_1} = \\eta^\\top \\Phi^\\top R \\Phi \\eta + \\sigma_\\tau^{-2},\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nh_{\\tau_1} &=& \\eta^\\top \\Phi^\\top R (Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\zeta_1),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\tau_2 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& N(Q_{\\tau_2}^{-1}h_{\\tau_2},\\; Q_{\\tau_2}^{-1}),\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nQ_{\\tau_2} = \\eta^\\top \\Phi^\\top \\Omega \\Phi \\eta + \\sigma_\\tau^{-2},\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nh_{\\tau_2}\n&=&\n\\eta^\\top \\Phi^\\top\n\\left[\n\\xi - \\Omega(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_3 \\Phi\\kappa + \\zeta_2)\n\\right],\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nand\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\tau_3 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& N(Q_{\\tau_3}^{-1}h_{\\tau_3},\\; Q_{\\tau_3}^{-1}),\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nQ_{\\tau_3} = \\kappa^\\top \\Phi^\\top \\Omega \\Phi \\kappa + \\sigma_\\tau^{-2},\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nh_{\\tau_3}\n&=&\n\\kappa^\\top \\Phi^\\top\n\\left[\n\\xi - \\Omega(X_2\\beta_2 + \\tau_2 \\Phi\\eta + \\zeta_2)\n\\right].\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\textbf{Variance Parameters}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^2 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim&\nIG\\left(a_1 + \\frac{N}{2},\\; b_1 + \\frac{1}{2}\\zeta_1^\\top \\zeta_1\\right),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^2 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim&\nIG\\left(a_2 + \\frac{N}{2},\\; b_2 + \\frac{1}{2}\\zeta_2^\\top \\zeta_2\\right).\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\nThus, all full conditional distributions in the joint model are available in closed form.\n\n\\subsection*{Univariate Gaussian Baseline}\n\nFor the univariate Gaussian baseline, the Gaussian response is modeled separately with its own spatial coefficient vector $u_1$\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nZ_1 \\mid \\beta_1,u_1,\\zeta_1 &\\sim& N(X_1\\beta_1 + \\Phi u_1 + \\zeta_1,\\; R^{-1}),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nwith priors\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\beta_1 &\\sim& N(0,\\sigma_\\beta^{2}I_{p_1}), \\,\\,\\,\\,\nu_1 \\mid \\sigma_{u_1}^2 \\sim N(0,\\sigma_{u_1}^2 I_r),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\zeta_1 \\mid \\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^2 &\\sim& N(0,\\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^2 I_N), \\,\\,\\,\\,\n\\sigma_{u_1}^2 \\sim IG(a_u,b_u), \\,\\,\\,\\,\n\\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^2 \\sim IG(a_{\\zeta_1},b_{\\zeta_1}).\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nThe full conditionals are\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\beta_1 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& N(Q_{\\beta_1}^{-1}h_{\\beta_1},\\; Q_{\\beta_1}^{-1}),\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nQ_{\\beta_1}=X_1^\\top R X_1 + \\sigma_\\beta^{-2} I_{p_1},\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nh_{\\beta_1}=X_1^\\top R(Z_1 - \\Phi u_1 - \\zeta_1),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nu_1 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& N(Q_{u_1}^{-1}h_{u_1},\\; Q_{u_1}^{-1}),\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nQ_{u_1}=\\Phi^\\top R \\Phi + \\sigma_{u_1}^{-2}I_r,\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nh_{u_1}=\\Phi^\\top R(Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\zeta_1),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\zeta_1 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& N(Q_{\\zeta_1}^{-1}h_{\\zeta_1},\\; Q_{\\zeta_1}^{-1}),\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nQ_{\\zeta_1}=R+\\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^{-2}I_N,\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nh_{\\zeta_1}=R(Z_1 - X_1\\beta_1 - \\Phi u_1),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\sigma_{u_1}^2 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim&\nIG\\left(a_u + \\frac{r}{2},\\; b_u + \\frac{1}{2}u_1^\\top u_1\\right),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\sigma_{\\zeta_1}^2 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim&\nIG\\left(a_{\\zeta_1} + \\frac{N}{2},\\; b_{\\zeta_1} + \\frac{1}{2}\\zeta_1^\\top \\zeta_1\\right).\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\n\\subsection*{Univariate Binomial Baseline}\nFor the univariate binomial baseline, the binomial response is modeled separately with its own spatial coefficient vector $u_2$\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\psi &=& X_2\\beta_2 + \\Phi u_2 + \\zeta_2,\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nand, conditional on P\\'olya--Gamma variables,\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\np(Z_2^E \\mid \\beta_2,u_2,\\zeta_2,\\omega)\n&\\propto&\n\\exp\\left\\{\n\\xi^\\top \\psi - \\frac{1}{2}\\psi^\\top \\Omega \\psi\n\\right\\}.\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nThe priors are\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\beta_2 &\\sim& N(0,\\sigma_\\beta^{2}I_{p_2}), \\,\\,\\,\\,\nu_2 \\mid \\sigma_{u_2}^2 \\sim N(0,\\sigma_{u_2}^2 I_r),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\zeta_2 \\mid \\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^2 &\\sim& N(0,\\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^2 I_N), \\,\\,\\,\\,\n\\sigma_{u_2}^2 \\sim IG(a_u,b_u), \\,\\,\\,\\,\n\\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^2 \\sim IG(a_{\\zeta_2},b_{\\zeta_2}).\n\\end{eqnarray*}\nThe full conditionals are\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\omega_i \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& PG(m_i^E,\\psi_i), \\,\\,\\,\\, i=1,\\dots,N,\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\beta_2 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& N(Q_{\\beta_2}^{-1}h_{\\beta_2},\\; Q_{\\beta_2}^{-1}),\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nQ_{\\beta_2}=X_2^\\top \\Omega X_2 + \\sigma_\\beta^{-2} I_{p_2},\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nh_{\\beta_2}=X_2^\\top\\left(\\xi - \\Omega(\\Phi u_2 + \\zeta_2)\\right),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nu_2 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& N(Q_{u_2}^{-1}h_{u_2},\\; Q_{u_2}^{-1}),\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nQ_{u_2}=\\Phi^\\top \\Omega \\Phi + \\sigma_{u_2}^{-2}I_r,\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nh_{u_2}=\\Phi^\\top\\left(\\xi - \\Omega(X_2\\beta_2 + \\zeta_2)\\right),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\zeta_2 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim& N(Q_{\\zeta_2}^{-1}h_{\\zeta_2},\\; Q_{\\zeta_2}^{-1}),\n\\,\\,\\,\\,\nQ_{\\zeta_2}=\\Omega+\\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^{-2}I_N,\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\nh_{\\zeta_2}=\\xi - \\Omega(X_2\\beta_2 + \\Phi u_2),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\sigma_{u_2}^2 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim&\nIG\\left(a_u + \\frac{r}{2},\\; b_u + \\frac{1}{2}u_2^\\top u_2\\right),\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\begin{eqnarray*}\n\\sigma_{\\zeta_2}^2 \\mid \\cdot &\\sim&\nIG\\left(a_{\\zeta_2} + \\frac{N}{2},\\; b_{\\zeta_2} + \\frac{1}{2}\\zeta_2^\\top \\zeta_2\\right).\n\\end{eqnarray*}\n\\end{document}\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091165,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31965"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31965"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Colin Alstad"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Colin Alstad, Timothy Duff, Mordechai Katzman"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Segre-Determinantal Loci and the Image Variety for Three Flatland Cameras"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"16 pages"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"math.AG math.AC"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Motivated by applications of algebraic geometry to reconstruction problems in computer vision, we initiate a study of the equations of degeneracy loci associated with linearly dependent points on Segre varieties. When these points are constrained to lie on a common hyperplane, we prove that the vanishing ideals of these loci are prime, Cohen-Macaulay, and generated by the natural maximal minors, and that these minors form a universal Gr\\\"{o}bner basis."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:05:55 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:05:55 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Alstad","Colin",""],["Duff","Timothy",""],["Katzman","Mordechai",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Alstad\",\n \"Colin\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Duff\",\n \"Timothy\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Katzman\",\n \"Mordechai\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: conm-p-l.cls\n================================================\n%%\n%% This is file `conm-p-l.cls',\n%% generated with the docstrip utility.\n%%\n%% The original source files were:\n%%\n%% e-proc.dtx (with options: `cls,conmCls')\n%% This is a generated file.\n%% \n%% Copyright 2011, 2013 American Mathematical Society.\n%% \n%% American Mathematical Society\n%% Technical Support\n%% Publications Technical Group\n%% 201 Charles Street\n%% Providence, RI 02904\n%% USA\n%% tel: (401) 455-4080\n%% (800) 321-4267 (USA and Canada only)\n%% fax: (401) 331-3842\n%% email: tech-support@ams.org\n%% \n%% This work may be distributed and/or modified under the\n%% conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3c\n%% of this license or (at your option) any later version.\n%% The latest version of this license is in\n%% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt\n%% and version 1.3c or later is part of all distributions of LaTeX\n%% version 2005/12/01 or later.\n%% \n%% This work has the LPPL maintenance status `maintained'.\n%% \n%% The Current Maintainer of this work is the American Mathematical\n%% Society.\n%% \n%% ========================================================================\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesClass{conm-p-l}[2014/02/27 v2.04 CONM-P Author Class]\n\\DeclareOption*{\\PassOptionsToClass{\\CurrentOption}{amsproc}}\n\n\\ProcessOptions\\relax\n\\let\\AMS@require@snapshot\\@empty\n\\LoadClass{amsproc}[2011/08/15]\n\\def\\publname{Contemporary Mathematics}\n\\def\\ISSN{0271-4132}\n\\copyrightinfo{}{}\n\\InputIfFileExists{conm-p-l.cfg}{}{}\n\\endinput\n%%\n%% End of file `conm-p-l.cls'.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: paper.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[11pt]{conm-p-l}\n\\usepackage{aliascnt}\n\n\\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{amssymb}\n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\usepackage{amsthm}\n\\usepackage{cleveref}\n\n\\usepackage{amssymb}\n\\newcommand{\\dashedrightarrowhead}{\\mathrel{\\text{\\setbox0\\hbox{$\\twoheadrightarrow$}\\rlap{\\hbox to \\wd0{\\hfil$\\dashrightarrow$}}\\box0}}}\n\n% Authoring packages\n\\usepackage{todonotes}\n\n\\DeclareMathOperator{\\Image}{Im}\n\\DeclareMathOperator{\\height}{ht}\n\\def\\P {\\mathbb{P}}\n\\newcommand{\\CC}{\\mathbb{C}}\n\\newcommand{\\iv}{\\overline{\\operatorname{im}(\\Theta_{n})}}\n\\DeclareMathOperator{\\spr}{spr}\n\n\\theoremstyle{definition}\n\\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]\n\n% 1. Setup Definition\n\\newaliascnt{definition}{theorem}\n\\newtheorem{definition}[definition]{Definition}\n\\aliascntresetthe{definition}\n\\crefname{definition}{definition}{definitions}\n\\Crefname{definition}{Definition}{Definitions}\n\n% 2. Setup Remark\n\\newaliascnt{remark}{theorem}\n\\newtheorem{remark}[remark]{Remark}\n\\aliascntresetthe{remark}\n\\crefname{remark}{remark}{remarks}\n\\Crefname{remark}{Remark}{Remarks}\n\n% 3. Setup Lemma\n\\newaliascnt{lemma}{theorem}\n\\newtheorem{lemma}[lemma]{Lemma}\n\\aliascntresetthe{lemma}\n\\crefname{lemma}{lemma}{lemmas}\n\\Crefname{lemma}{Lemma}{Lemmas}\n\n% 4. Setup Proposition\n\\newaliascnt{proposition}{theorem}\n\\newtheorem{proposition}[proposition]{Proposition}\n\\aliascntresetthe{proposition}\n\\crefname{proposition}{proposition}{propositions}\n\\Crefname{proposition}{Proposition}{Propositions}\n\n% 5. Setup Corollary\n\\newaliascnt{corollary}{theorem}\n\\newtheorem{corollary}[corollary]{Corollary}\n\\aliascntresetthe{corollary}\n\\crefname{corollary}{corollary}{corollaries}\n\\Crefname{corollary}{Corollary}{Corollaries}\n\n% 6. Setup Example\n\\newaliascnt{example}{theorem}\n\\newtheorem{example}[example]{Example}\n\\aliascntresetthe{example}\n\\crefname{example}{example}{examples}\n\\Crefname{example}{Example}{Examples}\n\n% 7. Setup Problem (This fixes your specific issue!)\n\\newaliascnt{problem}{theorem}\n\\newtheorem{problem}[problem]{Problem}\n\\aliascntresetthe{problem}\n\\crefname{problem}{problem}{problems}\n\\Crefname{problem}{Problem}{Problems}\n\n% 8. Setup Solution\n\\newaliascnt{solution}{theorem}\n\\newtheorem{solution}[solution]{Solution}\n\\aliascntresetthe{solution}\n\\crefname{solution}{solution}{solutions}\n\\Crefname{solution}{Solution}{Solutions}\n\\DeclareMathOperator{\\Seg}{Seg}\n\n\\title{Segre-Determinantal Loci and the Image Variety for Three Flatland Cameras}\n\n\\author[Alstad]{Colin Alstad}\n\\email{calstad@clemson.edu}\n\n\\author[Duff]{Timothy Duff}\n\\email{tduff@missouri.edu}\n\n\\author[Katzman]{Mordechai Katzman}\n\\email{m.katzman@sheffield.ac.uk}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\\begin{abstract}\n Motivated by applications of algebraic geometry to reconstruction problems in computer vision, we initiate a study of the equations of degeneracy loci associated with linearly dependent points on Segre varieties. When these points are constrained to lie on a common hyperplane, we prove that the vanishing ideals of these loci are prime, Cohen-Macaulay, and generated by the natural maximal minors, and that these minors form a universal Gr\\\"{o}bner basis.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\\maketitle\n\\section{Introduction} \\label{sec:intro}\n\nThe story of this paper begins with a problem posed at the Fields Institute's Summer 2025 Workshop on Applications of Commutative Algebra.\n\\begin{problem}\\label{problem:flatland}\n\\emph{Given $n$ triples of points on the projective line, \n$$(p_{1j}, p_{2j}, p_{3j}) \\in \\left( \\mathbb{P}^{1}\\right)^{\\times 3} ,\\quad 1\\le j\\le n,$$ \nwhen does there exist a 2-dimensional reconstruction consisting of points $$q_{1},\\dots,q_{n}\\in\\mathbb{P}^{2}$$ and three full-rank linear projections $$A_{i}:\\mathbb{P}^{2}\\dashrightarrow\\mathbb{P}^{1}, \\quad 1\\le i \\le 3,$$\nsuch that $A_i q_j \\sim p_{ij}$ for all $1\\le i\\le 3$ and $1\\le j\\le n$?}\n\\end{problem}\nThe entities $ A_i, q_j$ and $p_{ij}$ appearing in \\Cref{problem:flatland} may be represented by matrices with dimensions $2\\times 3$, $3\\times 1$, and $2\\times 1$, respectively, and the predicate $\\sim $ denotes equality up to scale.\nThe linear projections $A_1, A_2, A_3$ are commonly known as \\emph{flatland cameras}, and play an important role in an emerging interdisciplinary field known as \\emph{algebraic vision}~\\cite{kileel2022snapshot}.\n\n\\Cref{problem:flatland} concerns reconstructing a 2D scene from 1D images.\nHigher-dimensional analogues are naturally also of interest: in particular, reconstructing a 3D scene from 2D images, where as few as two cameras may be used.\nLet us point out, however, that the reconstruction problem for just two flatland cameras is completely trivial!\nThis can be seen through the following construction, adapted from~\\cite{agarwal2026computer}: if we choose coordinates in $\\mathbb{P}^1$ so that\n$$\np_{1j}\\sim \\begin{pmatrix}\na_j\\\\\n 1\n\\end{pmatrix}, \\, \\,\np_{2j} \\sim \n\\begin{pmatrix}\n 1\\\\\n b_j\n\\end{pmatrix} \\in \\mathbb{P}^1,\n\\quad \n1\\le j \\le n,\n$$\nthen one may easily produce a reconstruction by setting\n$$\nA_1 = \\begin{pmatrix}\n1 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n0 & 1 & 0 \n\\end{pmatrix},\n\\quad \nA_2 = \\begin{pmatrix}\n0 & 1 & 0 \\\\\n0 & 0 & 1 \n\\end{pmatrix}, \n\\quad \nq_j =\n\\begin{pmatrix}\na_j\\\\\n1\\\\\nb_j\n\\end{pmatrix},\n\\quad \n1\\le j \\le n.\n$$\nThus, as suggested by the statement of \\Cref{problem:flatland}, three flatland cameras are needed in order to make the flatlander reconstruction problem interesting.\n\nThe main results of this paper imply, as a special case, an \\emph{implicit characterization} of the solutions to \\Cref{problem:flatland}.\nFollowing~\\cite{agarwal2024atlas}, we study the \\emph{flatlander image variety}: letting $\\mathbb{P}^{2\\times 3-1}\\cong \\mathbb{P}^5$ denote the projective space of all $2\\times 3$ matrices, this is the closure of the image of the rational map\n\\begin{align}\n\\Theta_{n} : \\left( \\P^2 \\right)^{\\times n} \\times \\left( \\P^{2\\times 3-1}\\right)^{\\times 3} &\\dashrightarrow \\left( \\P^{1}\\right)^{\\times 3n} \\nonumber \\\\\n(q_1, \\ldots , q_n, A_1, A_2, A_3 ) &\\mapsto \\left(A_i q_j \\mid 1\\le i \\le 3 , 1\\le j \\le n \\right) \\label{eq:flatland-image-map}.\n\\end{align}\n\nHere, and throughout the paper, we work with complex algebraic varieties, so that the closure $\\overline{\\operatorname{im} \\left(\\Theta_n\\right)}$ may be understood in either the Zariski or the analytic topology.\nOur main results imply, as a special case, that the flatlander image variety is a determinantal variety with especially nice equations.\nMore precisely, our results imply for all $n\\ge 1$ that\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:flatland-implicit}\n\\overline{\\operatorname{im} \\left(\\Theta_n\\right)}\n=\n\\left\\{ \n(p_{11}, \\ldots , p_{3n}) \\in \\left(\\mathbb{P}^1 \\right)^{\\times 3n}\n\\, \\, \\Bigg\\vert\n\\, \\, \n\\operatorname{rank} \\left( \n\\begin{array}{ccc}\n\\sigma (p_{11}, p_{21}, p_{31})^T\\\\\n\\hline \n\\vdots \\\\\n\\hline \n\\sigma (p_{1n}, p_{2n}, p_{3n})^T\n\\end{array}\n\\right) < 8\n\\right\\},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere \n\\begin{equation}\\label{flatland:segre}\n\\sigma (p_{1j}, p_{2j}, p_{3j}) = \np_{1j} \\otimes p_{2j} \\otimes p_{3j} \n\\in \\mathbb{P}^7\n\\end{equation}\ndenotes a $8\\times 1$ vector representing the Segre embedding $\\P^1 \\times \\P^1 \\times \\P^1 \\hookrightarrow \\P^7$.\n\nSince the flatlander image variety in~\\Cref{eq:flatland-implicit} is defined by the rank-deficiency of an $n \\times 8$ matrix, we see in particular that \\Cref{problem:flatland} can be solved in the affirmative for almost all choices of $n<8$ point-triples.\nFor $n=8,$ the flatlander image variety is a hypersurface in $\\left( \\mathbb{P}^1 \\right)^{\\times 24}.$\nIts equation is given by the \\emph{Segre determinant} studied extensively in recent work of Pratt~\\cite{pratt2025segre}.\n\nWhile proving~\\Cref{eq:flatland-implicit}, it became natural for us to study not only the left side of this equation, which served as our original motivation, but also a more general class of \\emph{Segre determinantal loci} suggested by the right side.\nIn \\Cref{sec:sdl}, we systematically study the maximal minor ideals of Segre-determinantal matrices, proving that they are prime and Cohen-Macaulay of the expected height (\\Cref{thm:sdl-irreducibility,thm:sdl-prime-cm}).\n\\Cref{sec:ugb} continues this study from a combinatorial angle: we prove \\Cref{thm:ugb}, which states that the maximal Segre-determinantal minors form a \\emph{universal Gr\\\"{o}bner basis}, i.e.~a Gr\\\"{o}bner basis for all possible monomial orders.\nFinally, in \\Cref{sec:sdl-in-cv}, we return to the original motivation from computer vision, presenting our solution for the imaging map in~\\Cref{eq:flatland-image-map} (\\Cref{thm:flatland}), and discussing further connections for future study.\n\n\n\\section{Segre-Determinantal Loci} \\label{sec:sdl}\n\nFor a finite sequence of integers $m_{\\bullet} = (m_1, \\ldots , m_r)$ with $m_i \\ge 1$ for all $i,$ consider the product of projective spaces $\\P^{m_\\bullet} := \\P^{m_1} \\times \\cdots \\times \\P^{m_r}$ under its Segre embedding,\n\\begin{align}\n \\sigma_{m_\\bullet } : \\P^{m_\\bullet} &\\to \\P^{M (m_\\bullet)} \\nonumber \\\\\n \\left( [p_{i, 0} : \\, \\cdots \\, : p_{i, m_i}] \\mid 1\\le i \\le r \\right) &\\mapsto \\left[ \\left(p_{1,0} \\cdots p_{r,0}\\right) : \\, \\cdots \\, : \\left( p_{1,m_1} \\cdots p_{r,m_r}\\right)\\right], \\label{eq:segre-map}\n\\end{align}\nwhere we define\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:M-of-m-bullet}\n M (m_\\bullet) = (m_1 + 1) \\cdots (m_r + 1) - 1.\n\\end{equation}\nFor convenience, we also introduce the notation\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:d-of-m-bullet}\nd (m_\\bullet) = m_1 + \\ldots + m_r,\n\\end{equation}\nthe dimension of the \\emph{Segre variety}, whose points $\\sigma_{m_\\bullet} (P) \\in \\P^{M(m_\\bullet)}$ are naturally identified with their preimages $P = (p_1, \\ldots , p_r) \\in \\P^{m_\\bullet}$ under $\\sigma_{m_\\bullet}.$\n%which in turn we will later think of as a $1 \\times (M (m_\\bullet)+1)$ row vector of homogeneous coordinates.\n\\begin{definition}\\label{def:sdl}\nFor any $m_\\bullet $ and $n \\ge 1,$ we define\nthe \\emph{Segre-determinantal locus} to be the smallest closed subvariety $\\Seg_{m_{\\bullet} , n}\\subset (\\P^{m_\\bullet})^{\\times n} $ containing all $p_\\bullet = (P_1, \\ldots , P_n) \\in (\\P^{m_\\bullet})^{\\times n} $\nwhose Segre images\n$\\sigma_{m_\\bullet } (P_1), \\ldots , \\sigma_{m_\\bullet } (P_n) \\in \\P^{M (m_\\bullet)}$ lie on some common hyperplane.\n\\end{definition}\n\nThe name ``Segre-determinantal locus'' is derived from the case of a hypersurface in a product of $r=2$ projective spaces,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:segre-determinant}\n\\Seg_{(m_1, m_2) , n}\\subseteq \\left( \\P^{m_1} \\times \\P^{m_2} \\right)^{\\times n},\n\\quad\nn = M(m_\\bullet) + 1 = (m_1+1) (m_2+1),\n\\end{equation}\nwhose equation is the \\emph{Segre determinant} recently studied by Pratt~\\cite{pratt2025segre}.\nFor $r>2$ factors, \\Cref{thm:sdl-prime-cm} establishes that the equations of $\\Seg_{m_\\bullet , n}$ are themselves just particular specializations of some Segre determinant in more variables.\nBesides their connection to algebraic vision, discussed further in \\Cref{sec:sdl-in-cv}, we refer to~\\cite{pratt2025segre} for a discussion of how Segre determinants connect to geometric invariant theory and the study of Chow-Lam forms, which arise as irreducible factors of certain specializations of Segre determinants.\n\n\\begin{remark}\\label{rem:higher-codimension}\nFor $1\\le k < M(m_\\bullet ),$ one could of course study an even more general class of Segre-determinantal loci $\\Seg_{m_{\\bullet} , n}^k$, where we instead require that the Segre images of \\Cref{def:sdl} lie on a common subspace of codimension $k$ (hence $\\Seg_{m_{\\bullet} , n}=\\Seg_{m_{\\bullet} , n}^{1}$).\nHowever, besides the further notational complications this introduces, the results we obtain in this work do not easily generalize to this setting. See \\Cref{ex:p111-four-minors-not-prime} for further discussion.\n\\end{remark}\n\nNote that for $n\\le M (m_\\bullet)$ in \\Cref{def:sdl}, we have $\\Seg_{m_{\\bullet}, n}\\ = (\\P^{m_\\bullet})^{\\times n}.$\nThus, the results that follow are mainly interesting when $n > M (m_\\bullet) .$\nWe now state the first of these results.\n\n\\begin{theorem}\n \\label{thm:sdl-irreducibility}\nFor any $m_\\bullet = (m_1, \\ldots ,m_r)$ and any choice of $n > M (m_\\bullet)$, the Segre-determinantal locus $\\Seg_{m_\\bullet , n} \\subset (\\P^{m_\\bullet})^{\\times n}$ is an irreducible subvariety of codimension $n - M (m_\\bullet).$\n\\end{theorem}\n\\begin{proof}\nFor $r=1,$ the equations of $\\Seg_{m_\\bullet , n}$ are those of the classical determinantal varieties, from which the result readily follows.\nThus, we assume $r>1$ for the remainder of the proof.\n\n Consider the incidence variety\n \\[\n W:=\\left\\{((P_1,\\ldots,P_n),H)\\in (\\P^{m_\\bullet})^{\\times n}\\times \\left(\\P^{M(m_\\bullet)}\\right)^*\n \\;\\middle|\\;\n \\sigma_{m_\\bullet}(P_i)\\in H \\text{ for all } i\n \\right\\}.\n \\]\n Here \\(\\left(\\P^{M(m_\\bullet)}\\right)^*\\) denotes the dual projective space parametrizing hyperplanes in \\(\\P^{M(m_\\bullet)}\\). Let\n \\begin{align*}\n \\pi_1&:W\\to (\\P^{m_\\bullet})^{\\times n},\n &\n ((P_1,\\ldots,P_n),H)&\\mapsto (P_1,\\ldots,P_n), \\\\\n \\pi_2&:W\\to \\left(\\P^{M(m_\\bullet)}\\right)^*,\n &\n ((P_1,\\ldots,P_n),H)&\\mapsto H\n \\end{align*}\n be the two coordinate projections of \\(W\\).\n\n Since \\(W\\) is closed in the projective variety \\(\\left(\\P^{m_\\bullet}\\right)^{\\times n}\\times \\left(\\P^{M(m_\\bullet)}\\right)^*\\), the image \\(\\pi_1(W)\\) is closed. By definition, \\(\\pi_1(W)\\) is exactly the Segre-determinantal locus \\(\\Seg_{m_\\bullet,n}\\). Thus, to complete the proof, it will suffice to show that \\(W\\) is irreducible and to compute \\(\\dim \\left(\\pi_1(W)\\right)\\).\n\n Let \\(X:=\\Image(\\sigma_{m_\\bullet})\\subset \\P^{M(m_\\bullet)}\\) be the Segre variety. Since $X$ is a nondegenerate, irreducible, and smooth projective variety of dimension \\(d (m_\\bullet) \\), a generic hyperplane section $X\\cap H$ has pure dimension $d(m_\\bullet ) - 1$. More precisely, by Bertini's theorem \\cite[Théorème~6.3(4)]{jouanolou1983}, there exists a dense open subset $\\mathcal{U} \\subset \\left(\\P^{M(m_\\bullet)}\\right)^*$ such that for all $H\\in \\mathcal{U}$, the hyperplane section $X\\cap H$ is irreducible.\n For such a hyperplane $H \\in \\mathcal{U}$, the fiber of $\\pi_2$ is\n \\[\n \\pi_2^{-1}(H)\n =\n \\{(P_1,\\ldots,P_n)\\in (\\P^{m_\\bullet})^{\\times n} : \\sigma_{m_\\bullet}(P_i)\\in H\n \\text{ for all }i\\}.\n \\]\n The Segre embedding $\\sigma_{m_\\bullet }$ is a (biregular) isomorphism of varieties, so applying \\(\\sigma_{m_\\bullet}\\) in each factor gives an isomorphism\n \\begin{equation}\n \\label{eq:fiberIsoProdIntersections}\n \\pi_2^{-1}(H) \\xrightarrow{\\sim} (X\\cap H)^{\\times n},\\qquad\n (P_1,\\ldots,P_n)\\longmapsto\n \\bigl(\\sigma_{m_\\bullet}(P_1),\\ldots,\\sigma_{m_\\bullet}(P_n)\\bigr).\n \\end{equation}\n Since a finite product of irreducible varieties is irreducible (see \\cite[\\S 3.1, Theorem 3]{Shafarevich94}), it follows that $\\pi_2^{-1}(H)$ is irreducible of dimension \\(n(d(m_\\bullet)-1)\\).\n Since $r>1,$ we have $d(m_\\bullet )\\ge 2,$ and hence \n $$\n\\dim \\left( \\pi_2^{-1}(H) \\right) = n(d(m_\\bullet)-1) > 1.\n $$\n Consider the open subset $W^{\\mathrm{O}} := \\pi_2^{-1}(\\mathcal{U}) \\subset W$.\n Since $\\mathcal{U}$ is irreducible and $\\pi_2$ is a morphism with irreducible fibers of constant dimension over $\\mathcal{U}$, it follows from the dimension estimate above and the irreducibility criterion for fibered varieties \\cite[Ch.~I, \\S6, Theorem 7 (ii)]{Shafarevich94} that $W^{\\mathrm{O}}$ is irreducible of dimension\n \\begin{align*}\n \\dim(W^{\\mathrm{O}}) &= \\dim(\\mathcal{U})+n(d(m_\\bullet)-1) \\\\\n &= M(m_\\bullet)+n(d(m_\\bullet)-1).\n \\end{align*}\n To show that $W$ is irreducible, let \\(W^{\\prime}\\) be an irreducible component of \\(W\\). The ambient variety \\((\\P^{m_\\bullet})^{\\times n}\\times (\\P^{M(m_\\bullet)})^*\\) has dimension \\(nd(m_\\bullet)+M(m_\\bullet)\\), and \\(W\\) is a subvariety satisfying \\(n\\) Zariski-closed conditions \\(\\sigma_{m_\\bullet}(P_i)\\in H\\) (for \\(1\\le i\\le n\\)). \n Hence every irreducible component of \\(W\\) has codimension at most \\(n\\) (see e.g.~\\cite[Ch.~I, \\S6, Corollary 5]{Shafarevich94}), and so\n \\begin{equation}\\label{eq:dimW'-lower}\n \\dim(W^{\\prime}) \\ge nd(m_\\bullet )+M(m_\\bullet)-n = M(m_\\bullet) +n(d(m_\\bullet)-1).\n \\end{equation}\n On the other hand, since \\(X\\) is nondegenerate, \\(\\dim(X \\cap H) \\leq d(m_\\bullet) - 1\\) for any hyperplane \\(H\\). By~\\Cref{eq:fiberIsoProdIntersections}, \\(\\pi_{2}^{-1}(H) \\cong (X \\cap H)^{\\times n}\\) and so\n \\begin{equation}\\label{eq:dim-fiberpi2-upper}\\dim(\\pi_{2}^{-1}(H)) \\leq n(d(m_\\bullet)-1).\\end{equation}\n Combining this last inequality with the fiber-dimension theorem (e.g.~\\cite[Ch.~I, \\S6, Corollary 5]{Shafarevich94}) gives us the bound\n \\begin{equation}\\label{eq:dimW'-upper}\\dim(W^{\\prime}) \\le \\dim\\left(\\overline{\\pi_{2}(W^{\\prime})}\\right) + n(d(m_\\bullet)-1) \\le M(m_\\bullet)+n(d(m_\\bullet) - 1).\n \\end{equation}\n Combining the inequalities in~\\Cref{eq:dimW'-lower} and~\\Cref{eq:dimW'-upper}, we obtain\n \\begin{align*}\n \\dim(W^{\\prime}) &= M(m_\\bullet) +n(d(m_\\bullet)-1),\\\\\n \\dim\\left(\\overline{\\pi_{2}(W^{\\prime})}\\right) &= M(m_\\bullet).\n \\end{align*}\n Thus \\(\\pi_2(W')\\) is dense in \\(\\left(\\P^{M(m_\\bullet)}\\right)^*\\), so \\(W'\\) meets \\(W^{\\mathrm{O}}\\). Since \\(W^{\\mathrm{O}}\\) is open in \\(W\\), the intersection \\(W' \\cap W^{\\mathrm{O}}\\) is a nonempty open subset of the irreducible variety \\(W'\\), and is therefore dense in \\(W'\\). Since $W'$ was an arbitrary irreducible component of $W,$ we have thus shown that every irreducible component of \\(W\\) is contained in \\(\\overline{W^{\\mathrm{O}}}\\), and hence \\(W = \\overline{W^{\\mathrm{O}}}\\) is irreducible.\n\n Finally, it remains to compute the (co)dimension of \\(\\Seg_{m_\\bullet,n}\\). Note that the fiber of \\(\\pi_1\\) over a point \\((P_1,\\ldots,P_n)\\in\\Seg_{m_\\bullet,n}\\) is\n \\[\n \\pi_1^{-1}(P_1,\\ldots,P_n)\n =\n \\bigl\\{H\\in \\left(\\P^{M(m_\\bullet)}\\right)^*:\\sigma_{m_\\bullet}(P_i)\\in H\\text{ for all }i\\bigr\\},\n \\]\n i.e.~the set of all hyperplanes containing the linear space \n $$\n \\langle\\sigma_{m_\\bullet}(P_1),\\ldots,\\sigma_{m_\\bullet}(P_n)\\rangle.\n $$\n Let us choose points \\(P_1,\\ldots,P_{M(m_\\bullet)}\\in \\mathbb{P}^{m_\\bullet}\\) so that their Segre images are in linear general position, and consider the hyperplane that they span,\n $$\nH_0 = \\langle\\sigma_{m_\\bullet}(P_1),\\ldots,\\sigma_{m_\\bullet}(P_{M (m_\\bullet )})\\rangle .\n $$\nChoosing additional points\n $$\n P_{M(m_\\bullet)+1},\\ldots,P_n \\in \\sigma_{m_\\bullet}^{-1}(X\\cap H_0),\n $$\n we obtain a point on the Segre-determinantal locus $$ (P_1, \\ldots , P_n ) \\in \\Seg_{m_\\bullet,n},$$ whose fiber under \\(\\pi_1\\) is the singleton \\(\\{H_0\\}\\). \n Since $\\pi_1$ surjects onto $\\Seg_{m_\\bullet , n}$, the fiber-dimension theorem implies the desired conclusion that\n \\[\n \\dim(\\Seg_{m_\\bullet,n})\n =\n \\dim(W)\n =\n M(m_\\bullet)+n(d(m_\\bullet)-1).\n \\]\n\\end{proof}\n\nTo make the preceding proof more concrete, we consider an example.\n\n\\begin{example}\\label{ex:sdl-flatland-special-case}\nConsider the sequence $m_\\bullet=(1,1,1)$, so that\n\\[\n \\P^{m_\\bullet}=\\P^1\\times\\P^1\\times\\P^1,\n \\qquad\n d(m_\\bullet)=1+1+1=3,\n \\qquad\n M(m_\\bullet)=(1+1)^3-1=7,\n\\]\nand \\(\\sigma_{m_\\bullet } = \\sigma_{(1,1,1)} \\) is the Segre embedding\n\\[\n \\P^1\\times\\P^1\\times\\P^1 \\hookrightarrow \\P^7.\n\\]\nThe Segre-determinantal locus \\(\\Seg_{(1,1,1),\\, n}\\subset \\left(\\P^1\\times\\P^1\\times\\P^1\\right)^{\\times n}\\) parametrizes \\(n\\)-tuples \\(P_1,\\ldots,P_n\\) whose Segre images \\(\\sigma_{(1,1,1)}(P_1),\\ldots,\\sigma_{(1,1,1)}(P_n)\\) lie on a common hyperplane in \\(\\P^7\\).\nAs we will see later in \\Cref{thm:flatland}, this is precisely the Zariski closure of the image of the flatlander imaging map in~\\Cref{eq:flatland-image-map} from the introduction.\n\nThe incidence variety appearing in the proof of \\Cref{thm:sdl-irreducibility} is\n\\[\n \\left\\{\n ((P_1,\\ldots,P_n),H)\\in\n (\\P^1\\times\\P^1\\times\\P^1)^{\\times n}\\times(\\P^7)^*\n \\;\\middle|\\;\n \\sigma_{(1,1,1)}(P_i)\\in H \\text{ for all } i\n \\right\\}.\n\\]\nFor a generic hyperplane \\(H\\), Bertini's theorem implies the intersection\n\\[\n \\Image(\\sigma_{(1,1,1)})\\cap H\n\\]\nis an irreducible surface, and hence $\\pi_2^{-1} (H)$ is irreducible of dimension \\(2n\\).\nTherefore, the proof of \\Cref{thm:sdl-irreducibility} gives the dimension count\n\\[\n \\dim \\Seg_{(1,1,1),n}=2n+7, \n \\quad n\\ge 7.\n\\]\nIn particular, \\(\\Seg_{(1,1,1),8} \\subset (\\P^1\\times\\P^1\\times\\P^1)^{\\times 8}\\) is a hypersurface.\n\\end{example}\n\nHaving shown irreducibility of the Segre-determinantal loci in \\Cref{thm:sdl-irreducibility}, we now concentrate on describing their prime vanishing ideals with our next result, \\Cref{thm:sdl-prime-cm}.\n\nRetaining our previous notation, consider the polynomial ring with complex coefficients in \\( n(d(m_\\bullet)+r) \\) variables defined as \n\\begin{equation}\n \\label{eq:poly-ring}\n R_{m_\\bullet , n} = \\CC \\left[ p_{j,i}^{(k)} \\mid 1\\le k\\le n, 1\\le j\\le r, 0\\le i\\le m_j \\right].\n\\end{equation} \n\n Let \\(\\mathcal{N}_{m_\\bullet,n}(p_\\bullet )\\) be the matrix whose rows are the vectors \\(\\sigma_{m_\\bullet}(P_k)\\), for $k=1, \\ldots , n$, in the standard tensor-product basis, i.e.\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Nmn}\n\\mathcal{N}_{m_\\bullet,n}(p_\\bullet ) =\n\\begin{pmatrix}\n \\sigma_{m_\\bullet } (P_1)^T \\\\\n \\hline \n \\vdots \\\\\n \\hline \n \\sigma_{m_\\bullet } (P_n)^T\n\\end{pmatrix} \\in \n\\left( \nR_{m_\\bullet , n}\n\\right)^{n \\times \\bigl(M(m_\\bullet)+1\\bigr) },\n\\end{equation}\nand let $I_{m_\\bullet , n} \\subset R_{m_\\bullet , n}$ denote the ideal of $\\left( M(m_\\bullet ) + 1\\right) \\times \\left( M(m_\\bullet ) + 1\\right)$ minors of this matrix.\n\n\\begin{theorem}\n \\label{thm:sdl-prime-cm}\n For $n \\ge M(m_\\bullet ) + 1,$ the maximal minor ideal $I_{m_\\bullet , n}$ is prime and of the expected height $n-M(m_\\bullet ),$ and the quotient ring $R_{m_\\bullet , n}/I_{m_\\bullet , n}$ is Cohen-Macaulay.\n Thus, by \\Cref{thm:sdl-irreducibility}, the maximal minors of $\\mathcal{N}_{m_\\bullet,n}(p_\\bullet )$ generate the vanishing ideal of $\\Seg_{m_\\bullet , n}.$\n\\end{theorem}\n\\begin{proof}\nThe multiprojective vanishing locus $\\mathcal{V}(I_{m_\\bullet , n})$ and $\\Seg_{m_\\bullet , n}$ are manifestly equal; in the notation of the proof of \\Cref{thm:sdl-irreducibility}, both varieties are the image of the incidence variety $W$ under $\\pi_1.$\nUsing an incidence-variety argument entirely analogous to that used in the last proof, we may see that the affine variety $\\mathcal{V}_{\\text{aff}} (I_{m_\\bullet , n}) \\subset \\mathbb{C}^{n(d(m_\\bullet)+r)}$ is also irreducible.\n\nTo compute the height of the ideal $I_{m_\\bullet , n}$, we subtract the dimension of the affine cone over $\\Seg_{m_\\bullet , n}$ from the total number of variables in $R_{m_\\bullet , n}$: this gives \n\\begin{align}\\label{eq:height}\n \\height \\left( I_{m_\\bullet , n} \\right) &=\n n(d(m_\\bullet)+r) - \n \\left( \nM(m_\\bullet ) + n (d(m_\\bullet )-1) + nr\n \\right)\\\\\n &=n-M(m_\\bullet). \\nonumber \n \\end{align}\n Since $n \\ge M(m_\\bullet ) + 1,$ this is the expected height for the ideal of maximal minors for a matrix of polynomials with size \\(n\\times(M(m_\\bullet)+1)\\). By the Eagon-Northcott perfection theorem (see e.g.~\\cite[Theorem~2.7]{bruns88_deter_rings}), the ideal \\(I_{m_\\bullet , n}\\) is perfect. Since \\(R_{m_\\bullet , n}\\) is a Cohen-Macaulay ring, it follows that the quotient ring \\(R_{m_\\bullet , n}/I_{m_\\bullet , n}\\) is also Cohen-Macaulay.\n\nIt remains to show that \\(I_{m_\\bullet , n} \\) is prime. \n By the Unmixedness Theorem (\\cite[Theorem 18.14]{eisenbud2013commutative}), all associated primes of $I_{m_\\bullet , n}$ have height $n - M(m_\\bullet ).$ \n Since $\\mathcal{V}_{\\text{aff}} (I_{m_\\bullet , n})$ is irreducible, it will suffice by the Nullstellensatz to show that $I_{m_\\bullet , n}$ is radical.\nWe will prove this via the Jacobian criterion for reducedness of Cohen-Macaulay rings~\\cite[Theorem~18.15(a)]{eisenbud2013commutative}. We index the columns of \\(\\mathcal{N}_{m_\\bullet,n}(p_\\bullet )\\) by exponent vectors \n$$\n\\alpha=(\\alpha^{(1)},\\ldots,\\alpha^{(r)})\\in \\mathbb{Z}_{\\ge 0}^{r} , \\quad 0\\le \\alpha^{(j)}\\le m_j.\n$$\nWe associate to any such exponent vector the point\n$$\nP_{\\alpha }\n=\n(e_{\\alpha^{(1)}}, \\ldots , e_{\\alpha^{(r)}}) \\in \\mathbb{P}^{m_\\bullet },\n$$\nwhere each $e_{\\alpha^{(j)}}$ is a projective standard basis vector of the appropriate size and in the usual ordering.\nLet us enumerate the points $P_\\alpha $ in the lexicographic order, \n\\begin{align*}\n P_{\\alpha_0} &= (e_0, \\ldots , e_0 ),\\\\ \n P_{\\alpha_1} &= (e_0, \\ldots , e_1),\\\\\n &\\, \\, \\, \\vdots \\\\\n P_{\\alpha_{M(m_\\bullet )}} &= (e_{m_1}, \\ldots , e_{m_r}), \n\\end{align*}\nand set \n$$\n\\beta = (1,0,\\ldots , 0) \\in \\mathbb{Z}_{\\ge 0}^r\n\\quad \n\\Rightarrow \n\\quad \nP_\\beta = (e_1, e_0, \\ldots, e_0) \\in \\mathbb{P}^{m_\\bullet } .\n$$\nWe now construct a point $q_\\bullet \\in \\Seg_{m_\\bullet , n}$ by collecting all but the first of these points in order and then repeating $P_{\\beta}$ in the last $n - M(m_\\bullet )$ factors:\n$$\nq_\\bullet = \\left( \nP_{\\alpha_1},\n\\ldots , \nP_{\\alpha_{M(m_\\bullet )}},\nP_{\\beta},\n\\ldots \nP_{\\beta}\n\\right) \\in \\Seg_{m_\\bullet , n} .\n$$\nFor \\(k=M(m_\\bullet)+1,\\ldots,n\\), let \\(f_k\\) be the maximal minor of $\\mathcal{N}_{m_\\bullet , n}(p_\\bullet)$ which uses the first \\(M(m_\\bullet)\\) rows together with row \\(k\\), and consider the Jacobian submatrix at $q_\\bullet$ given by\n$$\nJ_{q_\\bullet} = \\left( \\displaystyle\\frac{\\partial f_k}{\\partial p_{1,0}^{(\\ell )}} (q_\\bullet )\\right)_{\\substack{M(m_\\bullet) < \\ell , k \\le n\\\\}} \\in \\CC^{(n - M(m_\\bullet) ) \\times (n - M(m_\\bullet ))}.\n$$\nIt is easy to see that $J_{q_\\bullet}$ is a diagonal matrix, since the $\\ell $-th row of this matrix does not involve the variables $p_{1,0}^{(\\ell )}$ for $\\ell > M(m_\\bullet)$ with $\\ell \\ne k .$ \nTo complete the proof, it will be enough to show that the diagonal entries of $J_{q_\\bullet}$ are all $\\pm 1.$ \nThis can be seen by computing $f_k$ by cofactor expansion along the $k$-th row: for an appropriate choice of signs, we have\n$$\nf_k (p_\\bullet) = \n\\displaystyle\\sum_{\\alpha } \n\\operatorname{sgn} (\\alpha ) \\cdot \\textrm{cof}_{\\alpha , k} (p_\\bullet ) \\cdot p_{1,\\alpha^{(1)}}^{(k)} \\cdots p_{r,\\alpha^{(r)}}^{(k)}.\n$$\nNote that each cofactor $\\textrm{cof}_{\\alpha , k} (p_\\bullet)$ does not involve any variables of the form $p_{j,i}^{(k)},$ i.e.~those variables appearing in the $k$-th row of $\\mathcal{N}_{m_\\bullet,n}(p_\\bullet)$.\nThus, we may differentiate $f_k$ to obtain\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:partial-derivative}\n\\displaystyle\\frac{\\partial f_k}{\\partial p_{1,0}^{(k)}}\n=\n\\displaystyle\\sum_{\\alpha \\, : \\, \\alpha^{(1)} = 0} \n\\operatorname{sgn} (\\alpha ) \\, \\textrm{cof}_{\\alpha , k} (p_\\bullet)\\, p_{2,\\alpha^{(2)}}^{(k)} \\cdots p_{r,\\alpha^{(r)}}^{(k)}.\n\\end{equation}\nWhen we evaluate the partial derivative in~\\Cref{eq:partial-derivative} at $q_\\bullet,$ all summands with $\\alpha^{(j)} >0 $ for some $2\\le j \\le r$ will vanish, due to the zero-structure of $P_\\beta .$\nHence \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:partial-derivative-eval}\n\\displaystyle\\frac{\\partial f_k}{\\partial p_{1,0}^{(k)}} (q_\\bullet)\n=\n\\pm \\, \\textrm{cof}_{\\alpha_0, k} (q_\\bullet).\n\\end{equation}\nFinally, it remains to observe that $\\textrm{cof}_{\\alpha_0, k} (q_\\bullet) = \\pm 1$.\nTo see this, simply note that by the construction of $P_{\\alpha_1}, \\ldots , P_{\\alpha_{M(m_\\bullet )}},$ the submatrix of $\\mathcal{N}_{m_\\bullet , n}(q_\\bullet)$ indexed by columns $\\alpha_1, \\ldots , \\alpha_{M(m_\\bullet )}$ and rows $1, \\ldots , M(m_\\bullet )$ is simply the $M(m_\\bullet )\\times M(m_\\bullet)$ identity matrix.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\begin{example}\\label{ex:p111-jacobian-point}\n We illustrate the Jacobian calculation above in the case \\(m_\\bullet=(1,1,1)\\) and\n \\(n=9\\). Here \\(d(m_\\bullet)=3\\), \\(r=3\\), \\(M(m_\\bullet)=7\\), \\( \\dim( R_{m_\\bullet , n}) =9(3+3)=54\\), and hence\n \\[\n \\height (I_{m_\\bullet , n}) = n-M(m_\\bullet)=9-7=2.\n \\]\n We order the columns of the matrix $\\mathcal{N}_{m_\n \\bullet , n}(p_\\bullet)$ lexicographically, \n \\begin{align*}\n \\alpha_0 = (0,0,0), \n \\quad \n \\alpha_1 = (0,0,1),\n &\\quad \n \\alpha_2 = (0,1,0), \n \\quad \n \\alpha_3 = (0,1,1),\n \\\\\\ \n \\alpha_4 = (1,0,0), \n \\quad \n \\alpha_5 = (1,0,1),\n &\\quad \n \\alpha_6 = (1,1,0), \n \\quad \n \\alpha_7 = (1,1,1), \n \\end{align*}\nso that\n\\begin{equation}\n\\mathcal{N}_{m_\n \\bullet , n} (p_\\bullet)\n =\n{ \\scriptsize \n \\begin{pmatrix}\n p_{1,0}^{(1)}p_{2,0}^{(1)}p_{3,0}^{(1)}&\n p_{1,0}^{(1)}p_{2,0}^{(1)}p_{3,1}^{(1)}&\n p_{1,0}^{(1)}p_{2,1}^{(1)}p_{3,0}^{(1)}&\n p_{1,0}^{(1)}p_{2,1}^{(1)}p_{3,1}^{(1)}&\n p_{1,1}^{(1)}p_{2,0}^{(1)}p_{3,0}^{(1)}&\n p_{1,1}^{(1)}p_{2,0}^{(1)}p_{3,1}^{(1)}&\n p_{1,1}^{(1)}p_{2,1}^{(1)}p_{3,0}^{(1)}&\n p_{1,1}^{(1)}p_{2,1}^{(1)}p_{3,1}^{(1)}\\\\\n \\vdots & \\vdots & \\vdots & \\vdots & \\vdots & \\vdots & \\vdots & \\vdots \\\\\n p_{1,0}^{(9)}p_{2,0}^{(9)}p_{3,0}^{(9)}&\n p_{1,0}^{(9)}p_{2,0}^{(9)}p_{3,1}^{(9)}&\n p_{1,0}^{(9)}p_{2,1}^{(9)}p_{3,0}^{(9)}&\n p_{1,0}^{(9)}p_{2,1}^{(9)}p_{3,1}^{(9)}&\n p_{1,1}^{(9)}p_{2,0}^{(9)}p_{3,0}^{(9)}&\n p_{1,1}^{(9)}p_{2,0}^{(9)}p_{3,1}^{(9)}&\n p_{1,1}^{(9)}p_{2,1}^{(9)}p_{3,0}^{(9)}&\n p_{1,1}^{(9)}p_{2,1}^{(9)}p_{3,1}^{(9)}\n \\end{pmatrix}\n }.\\label{eq:N-specific}\n\\end{equation}\nIn the notation of the proof, we have $\\beta = \\alpha_4 = (1,0,0),$ and $q_\\bullet \\in \\Seg_{(1,1,1) , 9}$ is given as follows: \n\\begin{align*}\nP_1 = \\left( [1:0], [1:0], [0:1] \\right), &\\quad \nP_2 = \\left( [1:0], [0:1], [1:0] \\right),\n\\quad \nP_3 = \\left( [1:0], [0:1], [0:1] \\right),\\nonumber \\\\\nP_5 = \\left( [0:1], [1:0], [0:1] \\right),\n&\\quad \nP_6 = \\left( [0:1], [0:1], [1:0] \\right),\n\\quad \nP_7 = \\left( [0:1], [0:1], [0:1] \\right), \\nonumber \\\\\nP_4 = P_8 = P_9 = \\left( [0:1], [1:0], [1:0] \\right),\n&\\quad \nq_\\bullet = (P_1, P_2, P_3, P_4, P_5, P_6, P_7, P_4, P_4).\n\\end{align*}\nEvaluating the matrix in~\\Cref{eq:N-specific} at $q_\\bullet$ gives\n\\begin{equation}\n \\label{eq:N-specific-eval}\n \\mathcal{N}_{m_\n \\bullet , n} (q_\\bullet) = \n \\begin{pmatrix}\n 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\\\\n 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\\\\n 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \n \\end{pmatrix}\n\\end{equation}\nFor the maximal minors $f_1, f_2 \\in I_{(1,1,1), 9}$ defined by deleting rows $9$ and $8$ from~\\Cref{eq:N-specific}, respectively,\na straightforward computation gives\n\\begin{equation}\nJ_{q_\\bullet} = \n\\begin{pmatrix}\n \\displaystyle\\frac{\\partial f_1}{\\partial p_{1,0}^{(8)}} (q_\\bullet) & \n \\displaystyle\\frac{\\partial f_2}{\\partial p_{1,0}^{(8)}} (q_\\bullet)\n \\\\\n \\displaystyle\\frac{\\partial f_1}{\\partial p_{1,0}^{(9)}} (q_\\bullet) & \n \\displaystyle\\frac{\\partial f_2}{\\partial p_{1,0}^{(9)}} (q_\\bullet)\n\\end{pmatrix}\n= \\begin{pmatrix}\n -1 & 0 \\\\\n 0 & -1 \n\\end{pmatrix},\n\\end{equation}\nand thus $\\operatorname{rank} (J_{q_\\bullet}) = \\height (I_{m_\\bullet , n})=2.$\n\\end{example}\n\nIn view of \\Cref{rem:higher-codimension}, it is natural to ask to what extent \\Cref{thm:sdl-irreducibility,thm:sdl-prime-cm} can be generalized to non-maximal minor ideals for the Segre-determinantal matrix in~\\Cref{eq:Nmn}.\nWe close this section with an example showing that such a generalization would not be completely straightforward.\n\n\\begin{example}[A non-prime ideal of \\(4\\times 4\\) minors]\n \\label{ex:p111-four-minors-not-prime}\n As before, we take \\(m_\\bullet=(1,1,1)\\), so \\(M(m_\\bullet)=7\\).\nFor $n\\ge 4,$ the $4\\times 4$ minors of the $n\\times 8$ matrix in~\\Cref{eq:Nmn} do not generate a prime ideal.\nTo see this, we consider the \\(4\\times4\\) minor \\(\\Delta\\) that uses the first four rows and the first four columns of $\\mathcal{N}_{m_\\bullet , n}(p_\\bullet)$,\n \\[\n \\Delta=\n \\det\\begin{pmatrix}\n p_{1,0}^{(1)}p_{2,0}^{(1)}p_{3,0}^{(1)} & p_{1,0}^{(1)}p_{2,0}^{(1)}p_{3,1}^{(1)} & p_{1,0}^{(1)}p_{2,1}^{(1)}p_{3,0}^{(1)} & p_{1,0}^{(1)}p_{2,1}^{(1)}p_{3,1}^{(1)} \\\\\n p_{1,0}^{(2)}p_{2,0}^{(2)}p_{3,0}^{(2)} & p_{1,0}^{(2)}p_{2,0}^{(2)}p_{3,1}^{(2)} & p_{1,0}^{(2)}p_{2,1}^{(2)}p_{3,0}^{(2)} & p_{1,0}^{(2)}p_{2,1}^{(2)}p_{3,1}^{(2)} \\\\\n p_{1,0}^{(3)}p_{2,0}^{(3)}p_{3,0}^{(3)} & p_{1,0}^{(3)}p_{2,0}^{(3)}p_{3,1}^{(3)} & p_{1,0}^{(3)}p_{2,1}^{(3)}p_{3,0}^{(3)} & p_{1,0}^{(3)}p_{2,1}^{(3)}p_{3,1}^{(3)} \\\\\n p_{1,0}^{(4)}p_{2,0}^{(4)}p_{3,0}^{(4)} & p_{1,0}^{(4)}p_{2,0}^{(4)}p_{3,1}^{(4)} & p_{1,0}^{(4)}p_{2,1}^{(4)}p_{3,0}^{(4)} & p_{1,0}^{(4)}p_{2,1}^{(4)}p_{3,1}^{(4)}\n \\end{pmatrix}.\n \\]\nUsing multilinearity of the determinant in rows, this factors as \n \\[\n\\Delta = p_{1,0}^{(1)}\\cdot p_{1,0}^{(2)}\\cdot p_{1,0}^{(3)}\\cdot p_{1,0}^{(4)} \n\\cdot \n \\det\\begin{pmatrix}\np_{2,0}^{(1)}p_{3,0}^{(1)} & p_{2,0}^{(1)}p_{3,1}^{(1)} & p_{2,1}^{(1)}p_{3,0}^{(1)} & p_{2,1}^{(1)}p_{3,1}^{(1)} \\\\\np_{2,0}^{(2)}p_{3,0}^{(2)} & p_{2,0}^{(2)}p_{3,1}^{(2)} & p_{2,1}^{(2)}p_{3,0}^{(2)} & p_{2,1}^{(2)}p_{3,1}^{(2)} \\\\\np_{2,0}^{(3)}p_{3,0}^{(3)} & p_{2,0}^{(3)}p_{3,1}^{(3)} & p_{2,1}^{(3)}p_{3,0}^{(3)} & p_{2,1}^{(3)}p_{3,1}^{(3)} \\\\\np_{2,0}^{(4)}p_{3,0}^{(4)} & p_{2,0}^{(4)}p_{3,1}^{(4)} & p_{2,1}^{(4)}p_{3,0}^{(4)} &\np_{2,1}^{(4)}p_{3,1}^{(4)}\n \\end{pmatrix}.\n \\]\n By degree considerations, none of the factors belong to the $4\\times 4$ minor ideal. Hence this ideal is not prime.\n\\end{example}\n\n\n\n\\section{Universal Gr\\\"obner Bases of Segre-Determinantal Loci} \\label{sec:ugb}\n\n\n\nIn this section, we prove that the maximal Segre-determinantal minors form a universal Gr\\\"{o}bner basis. \nRecall that a \\emph{universal Gr\\\"{o}bner basis} for an ideal $I\\subset \\mathbb{C}[x_1,\\ldots , x_n]$ is a Gr\\\"{o}bner basis for all possible monomial orders.\nUniversal Gr\\\"{o}bner bases always exist, but are generally quite difficult to compute---nevertheless, they have been determined for some especially nice determinantal ideals, such as \\Cref{ex:2x2-nonexample,ex:maximal-example} below.\nOur result utilizes a combinatorial criterion for universal Gr\\\"{o}bner bases developed by Huang and Larson, stated as \\Cref{thm:larson-huang} below, whose statement requires some rudiments of simplicial complexes and matroid theory.\n\nAn \\emph{abstract simplicial complex} $\\Delta $ over a finite ground set $S$ is a downward-closed family of subsets of $S$; that is, $\\Delta \\subset 2^S$ such that $A \\in \\Delta $ whenever $A\\subset B$ and $B\\in \\Delta .$\nUsually we simply refer to $\\Delta $ as a \\emph{complex}.\nThe elements of $\\Delta $ are \\emph{faces}, and inclusion-maximal faces are \\emph{facets.}\n\nThe complexes that interest us will mainly be \\emph{matroidal independence complexes}.\nThis means complexes $\\Delta $ which satisfy the \\emph{exchange axiom}, which states that if $A ,B \\in \\Delta $ with $ |A| < |B|,$ then there exists an $a \\in B \\setminus A$ with $A \\cup \\{ a \\} \\in \\Delta .$\nIt is a standard fact of matroid theory that independence complexes are \\emph{pure}, meaning that all facets have the same cardinality.\nThe facets of an independence complex are known as \\emph{bases}.\nA \\emph{matroid} may be defined in several equivalent ways: for instance, via its independence complex, or via its bases, or via its \\emph{circuits}, which may be understood as the minimal non-faces of a matroidal independence complex.\n\nWe now introduce two complexes that play main roles in our results. The first complex is defined via algebraic data. If $f_1, \\ldots , f_k \\in \\mathbb{C} [x_1, \\ldots , x_n]$ are nonzero polynomials whose terms are all squarefree monomials, we say that $F = \\{ f_1, \\ldots , f_k \\}$ is a \\emph{squarefree set of polynomials.} \n\n\\begin{definition}\\label{def:spread-complex}\nThe \\emph{spread complex} $\\Delta (F)$ associated to a squarefree set of polynomials $F = \\{ f_1, \\ldots , f_k \\}$ is the complex on the ground set of variables $S = \\{ x_1, \\ldots , x_n \\}$ whose minimal non-faces are the \\emph{spreads} (aka supports),\n\\begin{equation}\n \\label{eq:spread}\n \\spr (f_i ) = \\{ x_j \\text{ appears in some monomial of } f_i \\} , \\quad 1\\le i \\le k.\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{definition}\n\n\\begin{example}\n \\label{ex:flatland-spreads}\n Take \\(m_\\bullet=(1,1,1)\\). Then \\(M(m_\\bullet)=7\\), so the maximal minors of the matrix \\(\\mathcal{N}_{(1,1,1),n} (p_\\bullet) \\) are \\(8\\times 8\\). The variables in the \\(k\\)th row are\n \\[\n p_{1,0}^{(k)},\\ p_{1,1}^{(k)},\\\n p_{2,0}^{(k)},\\ p_{2,1}^{(k)},\\\n p_{3,0}^{(k)},\\ p_{3,1}^{(k)}.\n \\]\n If \\(K\\subset [n]\\) is a set of eight rows, then the corresponding maximal minor uses only the rows indexed by \\(K\\). Its spread is exactly\n \\[\n \\left\\{\n p_{j,i}^{(k)}\n \\;\\middle|\\;\n k\\in K,\\ 1\\le j\\le 3,\\ 0\\le i\\le 1\n \\right\\},\n \\]\n the set of all six variables from each of the eight selected rows.\n\n For instance, when \\(n=9\\), consider the set \\(U\\) containing all variables from rows \\(1,\\ldots,7\\), all variables from row \\(8\\) except \\(p_{1,0}^{(8)}\\), and all variables from row \\(9\\) except \\(p_{1,0}^{(9)}\\). This set contains no spread of a maximal minor because a spread requires eight complete rows, while \\(U\\) has only seven complete rows. However, adding either omitted variable completes one of rows \\(8\\) or \\(9\\), and then \\(U\\) contains the spread of an \\(8\\times 8\\) minor. Thus \\(U\\) is a facet of the spread complex. Its size is\n \\[\n 7\\cdot 6+2\\cdot 5=52\n =\n M(m_\\bullet)+n\\bigl(d(m_\\bullet)+r-1\\bigr)\n =\n 7+9\\cdot 5.\n \\]\n\\end{example}\n\nThe second complex that interests us is a much more geometric object---the algebraic matroid of an irreducible embedded affine variety. \nIf we are given such a variety $X \\subset \\mathbb{C}^n$, then the field of rational functions on $X$ is an image of the $n$-variable rational function field under a restriction map\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:restriction-to-X}\n\\operatorname{res}_X : \\mathbb{C} (x_1, \\ldots , x_n) \\to \\mathbb{C} (X ).\n\\end{equation}\n\n\\begin{definition}\\label{def:alg-matroid}\nGiven an irreducible subvariety of affine space $X \\subset \\mathbb{C}^n$, we define the \\emph{algebraic matroid} $\\Delta (X )$ to be the matroidal independence complex on the ground set of variables $\\{ x_1, \\ldots , x_n \\} $ whose faces are the subsets of variables whose images under $\\operatorname{res}_X$ are algebraically independent.\n\\end{definition}\n\nThe fact that $\\Delta (X)$ is a matroidal independence complex is a standard algebraic fact. \nMore geometrically, the faces of $\\Delta (X)$ may be characterized in terms of projections as follows: for any subset $U \\subset [n] := \\{ 1, \\ldots , n\\}$, we let \n\\begin{align}\n \\pi_U : X &\\to \\mathbb{C}^{|U|} \\nonumber \\\\\n (x_1, \\ldots , x_n ) &\\mapsto (x_i \\mid i \\in U)\n\\end{align}\ndenote projection onto the coordinates indexed by $U.$ We then have that $U \\in \\Delta (X)$ if and only if $\\pi_U$ is dominant.\n\nThe following result provides sufficient conditions for a squarefree set of polynomials $F$ vanishing on irreducible $X \\subset \\mathbb{C}^n$ to form a \\emph{universal Gr\\\"{o}bner basis} for the vanishing ideal $\\mathcal{I} (X)$---that is, a Gr\\\"{o}bner basis for all possible term orders on the polynomial ring $\\mathbb{C} [x_1, \\ldots , x_n].$ \n\n\\begin{theorem}\\label{thm:larson-huang}\\cite{huang2024fine}\nLet $X \\subset \\mathbb{C}^n$ be an irreducible closed subvariety of affine space, and let $F \\subset \\mathcal{I}(X)$ be a squarefree set of polynomials vanishing on $X.$ If the algebraic matroid of $X$ and the spread complex are equal, i.e. if~$\\Delta (X) = \\Delta (F) $, then $F$ forms a universal Gr\\\"{o}bner basis of $\\mathcal{I}(X).$ \n\\end{theorem}\n\n\\Cref{thm:larson-huang}, as stated above, is a special case of a more general universal Gr\\\"{o}bner basis criterion due to Huang and Larson~\\cite{huang2024fine}, which allows for more general varieties over arbitrary fields.\nThe special case stated above is sufficient for our purposes; a somewhat simpler proof in this case is given in ~\\cite{duff2025universal}.\n\nThe main difficulty in applying \\Cref{thm:larson-huang} is proving that the spread complex is contained in the algebraic matroid,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:hard-inclusion}\n\\Delta (F ) \\subset \\Delta (X).\n\\end{equation}\nsince the reverse containment\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:easy-inclusion}\n\\Delta (X ) \\subset \\Delta (F)\n\\end{equation}\nalways holds when the other hypotheses of \\Cref{thm:larson-huang} are satisfied.\nTo see the inclusion in~\\Cref{eq:easy-inclusion}, it is equivalent to observe that any non-face of the spread complex must also be a non-face of the algebraic matroid.\nIndeed, if $U \\notin \\Delta (F)$, then $U$ contains some spread, $\\spr (f_i) \\subset U.$ Since $f_i\\in \\mathcal{I}(X)$ is a nonzero polynomial vanishing on $X$, the coordinates indexed by $U$ satisfy a nontrivial algebraic relation on $X$, and hence $\\pi_U$ is not a dominant map. Thus $U \\notin \\Delta(X)$.\n\nSince $\\Delta (F)$ and $\\Delta (X)$ are both downward-closed, one can see that establishing the inclusion in~\\Cref{eq:hard-inclusion} on the level of facets is sufficient to show that $F$ is a universal Gr\\\"{o}bner basis.\nThus, we obtain the following simplification of \\Cref{thm:larson-huang}.\n\n\\begin{corollary}\\label[corollary]{cor:thm-restated}\nLet $X \\subset \\mathbb{C}^n$ be an irreducible closed subvariety of affine space, and let $F \\subset \\mathcal{I}(X)$ be a squarefree set of polynomials vanishing on $X.$ If every facet of the spread complex $\\Delta (F) $ is a basis in the algebraic matroid $\\Delta (X)$, then $F$ forms a universal Gr\\\"{o}bner basis of $\\mathcal{I}(X).$ \n\\end{corollary}\n\nTo apply this universal Gr\\\"{o}bner basis criterion, we will determine both the facets in the spread complex associated to the Segre-determinantal minors and the bases in the algebraic matroid of the Segre-determinantal locus.\n\nAs a warm-up, we describe how this criterion may be applied in the context of more classical determinantal ideals.\n\n\\begin{example}\\label{ex:2x2-nonexample}\nSuppose $F$ is the set of $2\\times 2$ minors of a $3\\times 3$ matrix of distinct indeterminates,\n$$\nP = \\begin{bmatrix}\n p_{11} & p_{12} & p_{13}\\\\\n p_{21} & p_{22} & p_{23} \\\\\n p_{31} & p_{32} & p_{33}\n\\end{bmatrix},\n$$\n$$\nF = \\{ \n\\det (P_{ij, k\\ell })\n\\mid \n1\\le i < j \\le 3,\n\\, \n1\\le k < \\ell \\le 3\n\\} .\n$$\nThe spread complex $\\Delta (F)$ contains facets of different sizes.\nFor example, \n$$U = \\{ p_{13}, p_{23}, p_{31}, p_{32}, p_{33} \\} \\in \\Delta (F)$$ \nis a facet of size $5$, complementary to $\\spr \\left( \\det (P_{12, 12}) \\right)$, while \n$$\nU' = \\{ p_{12}, p_{13}, p_{21}, p_{23}, p_{31}, p_{32} \\} \\in \\Delta (F) \n$$\nis a facet of size $6$, obtained by deleting the diagonals of $P.$\nSince all bases of a matroid must have the same size, these observations imply that $\\Delta (F)$ is \\emph{not} the algebraic matroid of the variety $X = \\mathcal{V} (F) \\subset \\mathbb{C}^9$.\nFor the general $2\\times 2$ minor ideal for a matrix of distinct indeterminate entries, \nthere is a well-known construction of a\nuniversal Gr\\\"{o}bner basis \n(see e.g.~\\cite{villarreal2001monomial},~\\cite[Ch.~5]{bruns2022determinants}), which consists of both the original minors and certain degree-$4$ binomials.\nThis construction may also be verified using \\Cref{thm:larson-huang}---see~\\cite{huang2024fine} for details.\n\\end{example}\n\n\\begin{example}\\label{ex:maximal-example}\nThe maximal minors of an $m\\times n$ matrix of distinct indeterminates $P$ are known to form a universal Gr\\\"{o}bner basis.\nThis result dates back to work of Bernstein, Sturmfels, and Zelevinsky~\\cite{BZ93,SZ93}---see also~\\cite[Ch.~5]{bruns2022determinants} for a more recent perspective.\n\\Cref{thm:ugb} below generalizes this result to the maximal minor ideals defining Segre-determinantal loci.\nAs a warm-up, we sketch a short proof of the Bernstein-Sturmfels-Zelevinsky result based on \\Cref{thm:larson-huang}.\n\nAssuming $m\\ge n$, the spreads of maximal minors are simply all $n\\times n$ submatrices of $P$. \nThus, any facet $U$ in the spread complex must be a union built from $n-1$ complete rows of $P$ and $m-n+1$ incomplete rows with a single entry deleted from each.\nGiven $\\tilde{p}\\in \\mathbb{C}^{|U|},$ points in the fiber $P\\in \\pi_U^{-1} (\\tilde{p})$ are solutions to a \\emph{low-rank matrix completion problem}, meaning that $P$ is a matrix of rank less than $n$ with entries partially specified by $\\widetilde{p}.$ \nFor generic $\\widetilde{p},$ the entries deleted to form $U$ can be set so that there is a unique completion $P$ of rank $n-1.$\nThis shows the map $\\pi_U$ is dominant.\nWe conclude, using \\Cref{cor:thm-restated}, that the maximal minors form a universal Gr\\\"{o}bner basis.\n\\end{example}\n\n\\begin{remark}\\label{ugb-remark}\n\\Cref{ex:2x2-nonexample,ex:maximal-example} illustrate two cases where the algebraic matroid of the variety of bounded-rank matrices can be characterized as the spread complex of a set of squarefree polynomials.\nFairly little is known about the algebraic matroid of bounded-rank matrices in general: we refer to~\\cite{tsakiris2024results,nicklasson2025determinantal,bernstein2017completion,brakensiek2026rigidity}, however, for further results on this subject.\nUniversal Gr\\\"{o}bner bases beyond the maximal and $2\\times 2$ cases are also not well-understood.\n\\end{remark}\n\nWe now prove the main theorem of this section.\n\n\\begin{theorem}\\label{thm:ugb}\nFor $n > M(m_\\bullet ),$ the maximal minors of the matrix $\\mathcal{N}_{m_\\bullet , n} (p_\\bullet)$ form a universal Gr\\\"{o}bner basis for the vanishing ideal of $\\Seg_{m_\\bullet , n}.$\n\\end{theorem}\n\\begin{proof}\n We apply~\\Cref{cor:thm-restated} to \\(\\mathcal{V}_{\\mathrm{aff}}(I_{m_\\bullet,n})\\), which is irreducible by~\\Cref{thm:sdl-prime-cm}. Let \\(F\\) be the set of maximal minors of \\(\\mathcal{N}_{m_\\bullet,n}(p_\\bullet)\\). These minors are squarefree because each determinant term uses one squarefree matrix entry from each selected row, and different rows involve disjoint variables.\n\n By~\\Cref{cor:thm-restated}, it is enough to show that every facet \\(U\\) of \\(\\Delta(F)\\) is a basis of \\(\\Delta(\\mathcal{V}_{\\mathrm{aff}}(I_{m_\\bullet,n}))\\). Since \\(\\mathcal{V}_{\\mathrm{aff}}(I_{m_\\bullet,n})\\) is irreducible, the bases of this algebraic matroid all have cardinality\n \\[\n \\dim \\mathcal{V}_{\\mathrm{aff}}(I_{m_\\bullet,n})\n =\n n(d(m_\\bullet)+r)-\\bigl(n-M(m_\\bullet)\\bigr)\n =\n M(m_\\bullet)+n\\bigl(d(m_\\bullet)+r-1\\bigr).\n \\]\n\n A maximal minor using the rows indexed by \\(K\\subset [n]\\), \\(|K|=M(m_\\bullet)+1\\), has spread equal to the full set of variables in those rows. No variable from another row can occur, and any selected-row variable \\(p_{j,a}^{(k)}\\) appears by choosing a column \\(\\alpha\\) with \\(\\alpha^{(j)}=a\\), expanding along row \\(k\\), and evaluating the corresponding cofactor on coordinate Segre rows indexed by \\(\\alpha'\\ne\\alpha\\), where it becomes a nonzero permutation determinant. Thus a facet \\(U\\) of \\(\\Delta(F)\\) is exactly \\(M(m_\\bullet)\\) complete rows together with all but one variable from each remaining row. Since a fixed row contains\n \\[\n \\sum_{j=1}^r(m_j+1)=d(m_\\bullet)+r\n \\]\n variables, every facet \\(U\\) has cardinality\n \\begin{align*}\n |U| &= M(m_\\bullet)\\bigl(d(m_\\bullet)+r\\bigr)\n +\n \\bigl(n-M(m_\\bullet)\\bigr)\\bigl(d(m_\\bullet)+r-1\\bigr)\\\\\n &=\n M(m_\\bullet)+n\\bigl(d(m_\\bullet)+r-1\\bigr)\n =\n \\dim \\mathcal{V}_{\\mathrm{aff}}(I_{m_\\bullet,n}).\n \\end{align*}\n\n It remains to show that the coordinate projection \\(\\pi_U\\) is dominant. Relabel the rows so that \\(U\\) contains all variables in rows \\(1,\\ldots,M(m_\\bullet)\\), and write the unique deleted variable in row \\(k>M(m_\\bullet)\\) as \\(p_{j_k,a_k}^{(k)}\\). For the complete rows, let \\(h_\\alpha(p_\\bullet)\\) be the signed maximal cofactor polynomial obtained by deleting the column indexed by \\(\\alpha\\). By the preceding cofactor argument, each \\(h_\\alpha(p_\\bullet)\\) is nonzero. The condition that an incomplete row \\(k\\) lie on the hyperplane determined by the complete rows is linear in \\(p_{j_k,a_k}^{(k)}\\), with coefficient polynomial\n \\begin{equation}\n C_k(p_\\bullet)=\n \\sum_{\\substack{\\alpha\\\\ \\alpha^{(j_k)}=a_k}}\n h_\\alpha(p_\\bullet)\n \\prod_{\\ell\\ne j_k} p_{\\ell,\\alpha^{(\\ell)}}^{(k)}.\n \\end{equation}\n This coefficient is not identically zero, since after choosing any \\(\\beta\\) with \\(\\beta^{(j_k)}=a_k\\) and specializing the retained variables in row \\(k\\) to \\(p_{\\ell,\\beta^{(\\ell)}}^{(k)}=1\\) for \\(\\ell\\ne j_k\\) and all others to \\(0\\), it reduces to the nonzero polynomial \\(h_\\beta(p_\\bullet)\\). Therefore, on the dense open set where the polynomial evaluations of all \\(h_\\alpha(p_\\bullet)\\) and \\(C_k(p_\\bullet)\\) are nonzero, the missing variables are uniquely determined. For the completed point \\(q_\\bullet\\), every row lies on the hyperplane \\(H(q_\\bullet)=[h_\\alpha(q_\\bullet)]_\\alpha\\). The completed matrix has rank at most \\(M(m_\\bullet)\\), so the image of \\(\\pi_U\\) contains this dense open set. Hence \\(\\pi_U\\) is dominant, and every facet of \\(\\Delta(F)\\) is a basis of \\(\\Delta(\\mathcal{V}_{\\mathrm{aff}}(I_{m_\\bullet,n}))\\).\n\\end{proof}\n\n\n\n\\section{Segre-Determinantal Loci in Computer Vision} \\label{sec:sdl-in-cv}\n\nWe now return to the problem from the introduction, motivated by computer vision.\nOur goal in this section is to introduce the image variety (\\Cref{def:image-variety}) for generalized pinhole cameras and its relationship with the Segre-determinantal locus of the previous two sections.\nIn particular, we will see that $\\Seg_{(1,1,1) , n}$ coincides with the image variety for three flatland cameras.\n\nFor an integer sequence $m_\\bullet = (m_1, \\ldots , m_r)$ as before, suppose now that we have a corresponding sequence $A_\\bullet = (A_1, \\ldots , A_r),$ where each $A_i : \\P^N \\dashrightarrow \\P^{m_i}$ is a projective linear map.\nChoosing standard coordinates on each projective space lets us identify each $A_i$ with a $(m_i +1 ) \\times (N+1)$ matrix, which is well-defined up to scale.\nThus, we may regard the sequence $A_{\\bullet }$ as a point\n\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:matrix-space}\nA_\\bullet \\in \\P^{m_\\bullet \\times N} := \\P \\left( \\CC^{(m_1+1) \\times (N+1)} \\right) \\times \\cdots \\times \\P \\left( \\CC^{(m_r+1) \\times (N+1)} \\right).\n\\end{equation}\n\n(Here, $\\P \\left( \\bullet \\right)$ denotes the projectivization of a complex vector space.)\n\n\\begin{definition}\\label{def:image-variety}\nFor any $n$, $N$, and $m_\\bullet $ as above, we define the associated \\emph{image variety} (c.f.~\\cite{agarwal2024atlas}) to be the closed image of the rational map\n\\begin{align}\n\\Theta_{N, m_\\bullet , n} : \\left( \\P^N \\right)^{\\times n} \\times \\P^{m_\\bullet \\times N} &\\dashrightarrow \\left( \\P^{m_\\bullet}\\right)^{\\times n} \\nonumber \\\\\n(q_\\bullet , A_\\bullet ) &\\mapsto \\left((A_1 q_j,\\ldots,A_rq_j) \\mid 1\\le j \\le n \\right) \\label{eq:general-image-map}.\n\\end{align}\n\\end{definition}\n\nFor $N=2$ and $m_\\bullet = (1,1,1),$ this agrees with the flatlander imaging map in~\\Cref{eq:flatland-image-map}.\n\n\\begin{proposition}\\label{prop:image-contained-segre}\nFor $N< d(m_\\bullet )$, we have\n\\[\n\\overline{\\Image \\left( \\Theta_{N,m_\\bullet , n}\\right)}\n\\subset\n\\Seg_{m_\\bullet , n}.\n\\]\n\\end{proposition}\nOur proof of \\Cref{prop:image-contained-segre} employs a rational map $\\Psi_{N, m_\\bullet }: \\P^{m_\\bullet \\times N} \\dashrightarrow \\mathcal{T}_{N, m_\\bullet } $ which maps the space of $r$-tuples of generalized cameras dominantly onto the associated variety of \\emph{Grassmann tensors.}\nEach point in this variety is a tuple of $r$th-order tensors, each considered up to scale,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:tensor-space}\n\\mathcal{T}_{N, m_\\bullet } \\subseteq \\P \\left(\n\\CC^{m_1+1} \\otimes \\cdots \\otimes \\CC^{m_r + 1}\n\\right)^{\\times B (N, m_\\bullet )},\n\\quad\n\\text{ w/ } B (N, m_\\bullet ) = \\binom{d(m_\\bullet) + r }{N+r+1}.\n\\end{equation}\nTo define the map $\\Psi_{N, m_\\bullet },$ suppose first that we have $\\Theta_{N, m_\\bullet , n} (q_\\bullet , A_\\bullet ) = p_\\bullet $ for some $p_\\bullet \\in \\left(\\P^{m_\\bullet }\\right)^{\\times n}.$\nFixing homogeneous coordinates, this then implies that for all $1\\le i \\le r $ and $1\\le j \\le n$ there exists a nonzero scalar $\\lambda_{ij}$ such that $A_i q_j = \\lambda_{ij} p_{ij}.$\nFor fixed $j,$ we obtain a linear system\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:matrix-focals}\n\\mathcal{M}_{N, m_\\bullet , j} (A_\\bullet, p_\\bullet) \\cdot\n\\begin{pmatrix}\nq_j\\\\\n-\\lambda_{1j}\\\\\n\\vdots \\\\\n-\\lambda_{rj}\n\\end{pmatrix}\n= \\begin{pmatrix}\n 0 \\\\\n \\vdots \\\\\n 0\n\\end{pmatrix},\n\\end{equation}\nwhose coefficient matrix is given in block form as\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:matrix-focals-block}\n\\mathcal{M}_{N, m_\\bullet , j} (A_\\bullet, p_\\bullet) =\n\\begin{pmatrix}\n A_1 & p_{1j}\\\\\n \\vdots & & \\ddots \\\\\n A_r & & & p_{rj}\n\\end{pmatrix} \\in \\CC^{\\left( d(m_\\bullet) + r \\right) \\times \\left( N + r + 1\\right)}.\n\\end{equation}\nSince $N<d(m_\\bullet)$, the maximal minors of the matrix in~\\Cref{eq:matrix-focals} are determinants of $(N+r+1) \\times (N+r+1)$ submatrices. These minors define multihomogeneous forms on $\\P^{m_\\bullet \\times N} \\times \\P^{m_\\bullet} $ which are linear in the $p_{ij}$ variables. Thus, every such minor can be written as\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:grassmann-tensor-linear-forms}\n\\displaystyle\\sum \\Psi_{S, N, m_\\bullet} (A_\\bullet)_{i_1, \\ldots , i_r} \\cdot p_{1j}^{(i_1)} \\cdots p_{rj}^{(i_r)},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $S$ is some set indexing $N+r+1$ rows of the matrix $\\mathcal{M}_{N, m_\\bullet , j} (A_\\bullet, p_\\bullet)$.\nFinally, the rational map $\\Psi_{N, m_\\bullet }$ is defined component-wise by the projective equivalence classes of the coefficient tensors $\\Psi_{S, N, m_\\bullet } (A_\\bullet)$ defining the linear forms in~\\Cref{eq:grassmann-tensor-linear-forms},\n\\begin{align}\\label{eq:grassmann-tensor-map}\n\\Psi_{N, m_\\bullet} : \\P^{m_\\bullet \\times N} &\\dashrightarrow \\mathcal{T}_{N, m_\\bullet } \\\\\nA_\\bullet &\\mapsto \\bigg( [\\Psi_{S, N, m_\\bullet } (A_\\bullet)] \\mid S \\subseteq [m_1+\\ldots + m_r+r] \\text{ w/ } \\# S = N+r+1 \\bigg) \\nonumber\n\\end{align}\n\n\\begin{proof}[Proof of \\Cref{prop:image-contained-segre}]\nIt suffices to prove the claim on the dense open subset of the domain of $\\Theta_{N,m_\\bullet,n}$ where $\\Psi_{N,m_\\bullet}$ is defined, since $\\Seg_{m_\\bullet,n}$ is closed.\nSuppose $p_\\bullet = (P_1, \\ldots , P_n)$ lies in the image of this open subset, so that $p_\\bullet = \\Theta_{N, m_\\bullet , n} (q_\\bullet , A_\\bullet)$ for some point $(q_\\bullet , A_\\bullet)$ with $\\Psi_{N,m_\\bullet}(A_\\bullet)$ defined.\nChoose a subset $S \\subseteq [ m_1+\\ldots + m_r+r]$ of size $N+r+1 $ whose coefficient tensor $\\Psi_{S,N,m_\\bullet}(A_\\bullet)$ is nonzero.\nFor every $1\\le j\\le n$, the linear system in~\\Cref{eq:matrix-focals} has a nonzero solution, so the corresponding maximal minor in~\\Cref{eq:grassmann-tensor-linear-forms} vanishes at $P_j$.\nThus the points $\\sigma_{m_\\bullet} (P_j)$ all lie on the hyperplane in $\\P^{M(m_\\bullet)}$ defined by $\\Psi_{S,N,m_\\bullet}(A_\\bullet)$, and hence $p_\\bullet \\in \\Seg_{m_\\bullet , n}$.\n\\end{proof}\n\nIn general, the inclusion of \\Cref{prop:image-contained-segre} is strict.\nThis may be seen by comparing the dimension of $\\Seg_{m_\\bullet , n}$ provided by \\Cref{thm:sdl-irreducibility} with the \\emph{expected dimension formula} for the image variety\n\\begin{align}\n\\mathbb{E} \\dim \\left(\\Image \\Theta_{N, m_\\bullet, n} \\right) &= \\dim (\\operatorname{Dom} \\Theta_{N, m_\\bullet, n}) - \\dim \\operatorname{PGL}_{N+1} \\nonumber \\\\\n&=\nN ( n + r) + (N+1) d(m_\\bullet ) - (N^2 + 2N)\n,\\label{eq:expected-dim-image-variety}\n\\end{align}\nwhere $n$ (depending on $N$ and $m_\\bullet $ ) is sufficiently large.\nThis formula comes by observing that $\\Theta_{N, m_\\bullet , n}$ is invariant under the natural action of $H \\in \\operatorname{PGL}_{N+1}$, $$H \\cdot (q_\\bullet , A_\\bullet ) = (Hq_1, \\ldots , Hq_n, A_1 H^{-1}, \\ldots , A_r H^{-1}).$$\nFor concrete values of $N$, $m_\\bullet $, and sufficiently large $n,$ we may verify that the expected dimension in~\\Cref{eq:expected-dim-image-variety} equals the true dimension of the image variety by computing tangent spaces.\n\nBelow, we consider several specific instances of the image varieties described above, as well as their corresponding Segre-determinantal loci. \nEach example gives pointers to the algebraic vision literature on which it is based, which may be useful for further study of image varieties.\n\nFirst, we solve the problem stated in the introduction of our paper.\n\n\\begin{example}\\label{ex:flatland-trifocal}\nFor $m_\\bullet = (1,1,1)$, $N=2$, we obtain the image variety associated to \\emph{three flatland cameras.}\nIn this case, the associated Grassmann tensor is the $2\\times 2\\times 2 $ trifocal tensor.\nThe study of this tensor in computer vision was pioneered in work of {\\AA}str{\\\"o}m-Oskarsson~\\cite{aastrom2000solutions} and Quan~\\cite{quan2002two}.\nIn computer vision terminology, the flatlander trifocal tensor has ``no internal constraints'', a designation which is often justified by informal dimension-counting.\n\nWe now offer rigorous justification for such dimension-counting.\nTo ease notation, we write $\\Psi = \\Psi_{[6], 2, (1,1,1) }$ for the flatlander trifocal tensor map constructed in the proof of \\Cref{prop:image-contained-segre}.\n\n\\begin{lemma}\n \\label{lem:flatland-trifocal-dominant}\n The rational map\n $\n \\Psi:\\left(\\P(\\CC^{2\\times 3})\\right)^{\\times 3}\\dashrightarrow \\left(\\P^7\\right)^*\n $\nis dominant.\n\\end{lemma}\n\\begin{proof}\nIt suffices to prove that the corresponding map of affine varieties \n\\[\n\\widehat{\\Psi } : \\left(\\CC^{2\\times 3}\\right)^{\\times 3}\\dashrightarrow \\mathbb{C}^8,\n\\]\nis dominant, which follows upon observing that the \\(8\\times18\\) Jacobian matrix $d \\widehat{\\Psi} (A_\\bullet) $ at the point\n \\[ \n A_\\bullet =\\left( \n \\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 \\\\ 0 & 1 & 0\\end{pmatrix}, \\, \n \\begin{pmatrix}0&1 & 0\\\\ 0 & 0 & 1\\end{pmatrix}, \\, \\begin{pmatrix}0&0&1\\\\ 1 & 0 & 0 \\end{pmatrix}\\right) ,\n \\]\nin an appropriate basis, contains a diagonal $8\\times 8$ matrix with $\\pm 1$ on the diagonal.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\begin{theorem}\\label{thm:flatland}\n For all $n\\ge 1,$ we have\n \\begin{equation}\\label{eq:segre-equals-image-variety}\n \\overline{\\Image \\Theta_{2,(1,1,1), n}}\n =\n \\Seg_{(1,1,1), n} .\n \\end{equation}\n\\end{theorem}\n\\begin{proof}\nIf $1\\le n \\le M(m_\\bullet ) = 7,$ then the equalities $\\Seg_{(1,1,1), n} = \\overline{\\Image \\Theta_{2,(1,1,1), n}}\n =\\left( \\mathbb{P}^1 \\right)^{\\times 3n}$ may be checked directly by computing tangent spaces.\nThus, we assume $n\\ge 8.$ \n\nSince \\(2<d(1,1,1)=3\\), \\Cref{prop:image-contained-segre} gives the inclusion\n \\[\n \\overline{\\Image \\Theta_{2,(1,1,1),n}}\\subseteq \\Seg_{(1,1,1),n}.\n \\]\nThis inclusion and \\Cref{thm:sdl-irreducibility} imply the inequality\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:dim-inequality}\n\\dim \\left( \\overline{\\Image \\Theta_{2,(1,1,1),n}} \\right) \\le \n\\dim \\left( \\Seg_{(1,1,1),n} \\right) = \n(d(m_\\bullet ) - 1) n + M(m_\\bullet ) = \n2n + 7.\n\\end{equation}\nSince both varieties $\\overline{\\Image \\Theta_{2,(1,1,1),n}}$ and \\(\\Seg_{(1,1,1), n}\\) are irreducible, the desired conclusion in~\\Cref{eq:segre-equals-image-variety} will follow if we can prove\nequality throughout~\\Cref{eq:dim-inequality}.\nNote that this agrees with the expected dimension in~\\Cref{eq:expected-dim-image-variety},\n\\[\n\\mathbb{E} \\dim \\left(\\Image \\Theta_{2, (1,1,1), n} \\right) =\n2 ( n + 3) + (2+1) (1+1+1) - (2^2 + 2\\cdot 2) = \n2n + 7.\n\\]\nTo prove the expected dimension is correct, consider the rational map\n\\begin{align*}\n\\rho : \\overline{\\Image \\Theta_{2,(1,1,1),n}} &\\dashrightarrow \\left(\\mathbb{P}^7\\right)^*\\\\\np_\\bullet &\\mapsto \\mathbb{P}\\left(\\ker \\mathcal{N}_{(1,1,1), n} (p_\\bullet )\\right).\n\\end{align*}\nThis is well-defined: if $p_\\bullet =(P_1, \\ldots , P_n)\\in \\Image \\Theta_{2,(1,1,1),n},$ then $\\Theta_{2,(1,1,1),n} (q_\\bullet , A_\\bullet )= p_\\bullet $ implies that the hyperplane in $\\mathbb{P}^7$ defined by the trifocal tensor $\\Psi (A_\\bullet )$ contains $\\sigma_{(1,1,1)}(P_1),\\ldots , \\sigma_{(1,1,1)}(P_n).$\nFurthermore, $\\rho $ is dominant; this follows from \\Cref{lem:flatland-trifocal-dominant}.\nFinally, observe that a generic fiber of $\\rho $ has dimension $2n$: given a generic trifocal tensor $T=\\Psi (A_1, A_2, A_3 )$ and generic points $p_{1j}, p_{2j}\\in \\mathbb{P}^1,$ there are uniquely determined $q_j \\in \\mathbb{P}^2$ with $A_1 q_j \\sim p_{1j}$ and $A_2 q_j \\sim p_{2j},$ and we may define $p_{3j} \\sim A_3 q_j$ for all $j=1,\\ldots , n$ to obtain $p_\\bullet = (p_{11}, \\ldots , p_{3n})\\in \\Image \\Theta_{2,(1,1,1),n}$ with $p_\\bullet \\in \\rho^{-1} (T )$. Thus, \n$$\n\\dim \\left( \\overline{\\Image \\Theta_{2,(1,1,1),n}} \\right) = 2n + 7\n\\quad \n\\Rightarrow \n\\quad \n\\overline{\\Image \\Theta_{2,(1,1,1), n}}\n =\n \\Seg_{(1,1,1), n}.\n$$\n\\end{proof}\n\\end{example}\n\nWe now move from flatland to cases where the Grassmann tensors have nontrivial internal constraints.\n\\Cref{ex:fundamental-matrix,ex:trifocal-tensor,ex:quadrifocal-tensor} focus on classical pinhole cameras, i.e., linear projections $\\mathbb{P}^3 \\dashrightarrow \\mathbb{P}^2$.\n\\Cref{ex:radial-quadrifocal-tensor} concerns projections $\\mathbb{P}^3 \\dashrightarrow \\mathbb{P}^1,$ sometimes known as \\emph{radial cameras}.\n\n\\begin{example}\\label{ex:fundamental-matrix}\n\\cite{pratt2025segre}\nFor $N=3,$ $m_\\bullet = (2,2)$, the inclusion of \\Cref{prop:image-contained-segre} is strict:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:segre-strictly-includes-image-variety}\n\\overline{\\Image \\Theta_{3,(2,2), n}}\n\\subsetneq\n\\Seg_{(2,2), n}\n\\quad \\text{for all } n \\ge 8.\n\\end{equation}\nIn particular, when $n=8,$ \\Cref{thm:sdl-irreducibility} implies that $\\Seg_{(2,2), 8} = \\left( \\P^2 \\times \\P^2 \\right)^{\\times 8} = \\left( \\P^2 \\right)^{\\times 16}$.\nThe image variety in this case, however, is a hypersurface.\nWe briefly recall how the implicit equation of the hypersurface $\\overline{\\Image \\Theta_{3,(2,2), 8}}$ may be derived from the Segre matrix $\\mathcal{N}_{(2,2), 8}(p_\\bullet)$ using a classical construction from computer vision.\nFor any point $p_\\bullet = (P_1, \\ldots , P_8) \\in \\overline{\\Image \\Theta_{3,(2,2), 8}} \\subset \\left( \\mathbb{P}^2 \\times \\mathbb{P}^2 \\right)^{\\times 8}$,\n\\begin{align}\\label{eq:fundamental-constraint}\n \\det( \\mathcal{M}_{3, (2,2) , j}(A_\\bullet, p_\\bullet)) = \n\\det \\begin{pmatrix}\n A_1 & p_{1j} & \\\\\n A_2 & & p_{2j}\n \\end{pmatrix}\n =\n p_{2j}^T F(A_1, A_2) p_{1j} = 0,\n \\quad j=1,\\ldots , 8,\n\\end{align}\nwhere the Grassmann tensor $F(A_1,A_2)$ is a $3\\times 3$ rank-deficient matrix, known as the \\emph{fundamental matrix} associated to the cameras $A_1, A_2.$ \nThe constraints in~\\Cref{eq:fundamental-constraint} have ``vectorized'' forms:\n\\[\n p_{2j}^T F(A_1, A_2) p_{1j} = \n \\left( p_{1j} \\otimes p_{2j} \\right)^T \\textrm{vec} (F(A_1,A_2)), \n \\quad j=1,\\ldots , 8.\n\\]\nIn other words, the vectorized fundamental matrix must lie in the kernel of the $8\\times 9$ Segre matrix.\nUsing Cramer's rule, we may write the kernel as a $9\\times 1$ vector of polynomials in $p_\\bullet $.\nAfter suitably ``matricizing'' this $9\\times 1$ vector into a $3\\times 3$ matrix $F(p_\\bullet ),$ we have\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:8-point-constraint}\n\\overline{\\Image \\Theta_{3,(2,2), 8}}\n= \\mathcal{V} \\left( \\det F(p_\\bullet )\\right) \\subset \\left( \\mathbb{P}^2\\right)^{\\times 16}.\n\\end{equation}\nWe refer to~\\cite{hartley2003multiple} for background on the fundamental matrix, and~\\cite{agarwal2017existence} for more details and applications of this particular construction.\nFor $n>8,$ our Segre-determinantal minors provide additional constraints\nvanishing on $\\overline{\\Image \\Theta_{3,(2,2),n}}$.\nA natural question arises: for $n>8,$ do the $8$-point constraints in~\\Cref{eq:8-point-constraint} and the Segre-determinantal minors suffice to give equations for $\\overline{\\Image \\Theta_{3,(2,2),n}}$?\nTo make this more concrete, we may pose the problem of finding the following descriptions of the ideal of the image variety, in increasing order of difficulty: local equations, set-theoretic equations, scheme-theoretic equations, generators of the vanishing ideal, and/or (universal) Gr\\\"{o}bner bases.\nSimilar, more difficult, problems may be posed for the final three examples.\n\\end{example}\n\n\\begin{example}\\label{ex:trifocal-tensor}\nConsider now the case of three classical pinhole cameras: $N=3,$ $m_\\bullet = (2,2,2)$.\nJust like the case of two pinhole cameras in \\Cref{ex:fundamental-matrix}, the inclusion $\\overline{\\Image \\Theta_{3,(2,2,2),n}} \\subset \\Seg_{(2,2,2),n}$ is strict.\nIn particular, using \\Cref{thm:sdl-irreducibility}, the Segre-determinantal locus is a strict subvariety of its ambient space only for $n \\ge M(m_\\bullet ) + 1 = 27$ points.\nThe image variety, however, is already a strict subvariety for $n \\ge 7$ points.\nThe analogue of the fundamental matrix in this case is the $3\\times 3 \\times 3$ \\emph{trifocal tensor}.\nWhereas fundamental matrices are characterized by a single equation $\\det F = 0,$ the ideal of trifocal tensors is very complicated; a complete description of this ideal is a result of Aholt and Oeding~\\cite{aholt2014ideal}, which relies on sophisticated representation-theoretic machinery.\nAlternatively, one may approach the ideal of $\\overline{\\Theta_{3,(2,2,2),n}}$ via the ideal of \\emph{compatible fundamental matrix triples}, which was recently determined in~\\cite{duff2026multiprojective}.\n\\end{example}\n\n\\begin{example}\\label{ex:quadrifocal-tensor}\nFor four classical cameras---$N=3,$\n$m_\\bullet = (2,2,2,2)$---the Segre-determinantal locus is a strict subvariety of its ambient space only for $n \\ge M(m_\\bullet ) + 1 = 81$ points, whereas the image variety is a strict subvariety for $n \\ge 6$ points.\nThe analogues of fundamental matrices and trifocal tensors are the so-called \\emph{quadrifocal tensors}, whose implicit equations are only partially understood:~\\cite{oeding2017quadrifocal} offers a census of equations in low degrees.\n\\end{example}\n\n\n\n\\begin{example}\\label{ex:radial-quadrifocal-tensor}\nOur final example concerns $N=3,$ $m_\\bullet = (1,1,1,1)$. \nThis is the setting of the so-called \\emph{radial camera model}, concerning linear projections of the form $A:\\mathbb{P}^3 \\dashrightarrow \\mathbb{P}^1$.\nSuch radial cameras have been used to model optical systems with radially symmetric lens distortion such as fisheye cameras. See~\\cite{hruby-quadrifocal} for the implicit equations of radial quadrifocal tensors, and the references therein for more background.\nThe Segre-determinantal locus is a strict subvariety of its ambient space for $n \\ge M(m_\\bullet ) + 1 = 16$ points, whereas the image variety is a strict subvariety for $n \\ge 14$.\n\\end{example}\n\n\\section*{Acknowledgements} \nWe are grateful for the support and stimulating environment provided by the Fields Institute during the 2025 Workshop on Applications of Commutative Algebra, where this project was initiated.\nWe thank the workshop organizers, as well as Leo Jiang for helpful early discussions.\n\n\\bibliographystyle{amsplain}\n\\bibliography{references}\n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: references.bib\n================================================\n@book{Shafarevich94,\n title={Basic algebraic geometry 1: varieties in projective space},\n author={Shafarevich, I.R.},\n edition={Second},\n year={1994},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{tsakiris2024results,\n title={Results on the algebraic matroid of the determinantal variety},\n author={Tsakiris, Manolis},\n journal={Transactions of the American Mathematical Society},\n volume={377},\n number={01},\n pages={731--751},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@book{bruns2022determinants,\n title={{Determinants, Gr{\\\"o}bner bases and cohomology}},\n author={Bruns, Winfried and Conca, Aldo and Raicu, Claudiu and Varbaro, Matteo},\n volume={25},\n year={2022},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n@article{SZ93,\n AUTHOR = {Sturmfels, Bernd and Zelevinsky, Andrei},\n TITLE = {Maximal minors and their leading terms},\n JOURNAL = {Adv. Math.},\n FJOURNAL = {Advances in Mathematics},\n VOLUME = {98},\n YEAR = {1993},\n NUMBER = {1},\n PAGES = {65--112},\n ISSN = {0001-8708},\n MRCLASS = {52B11 (14M12 14M15 14M25 52B12)},\n DOI = {10.1006/aima.1993.1013},\n URL = {https://doi-org.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/10.1006/aima.1993.1013},\n}\n\n@article{BZ93,\n AUTHOR = {Bernstein, David and Zelevinsky, Andrei},\n TITLE = {Combinatorics of maximal minors},\n JOURNAL = {J. Algebraic Combin.},\n FJOURNAL = {Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics. An International Journal},\n VOLUME = {2},\n YEAR = {1993},\n NUMBER = {2},\n PAGES = {111--121},\n ISSN = {0925-9899},\n MRCLASS = {52B20 (13P10)},\n DOI = {10.1023/A:1022492222930},\n URL = {https://doi-org.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/10.1023/A:1022492222930},\n}\n\n@article{aastrom2000solutions,\n title={Solutions and ambiguities of the structure and motion problem for {1D} retinal vision},\n author={{\\AA}str{\\\"o}m, Kalle and Oskarsson, Magnus},\n journal={Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision},\n volume={12},\n number={2},\n pages={121--135},\n year={2000},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{agarwal2024atlas,\n title={An atlas for the pinhole camera},\n author={Agarwal, Sameer and Duff, Timothy and Lieblich, Max and Thomas, Rekha R},\n journal={Foundations of Computational Mathematics},\n volume={24},\n number={1},\n pages={227--277},\n year={2024},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n@article{aholt2014ideal,\n title={The ideal of the trifocal variety},\n author={Aholt, Chris and Oeding, Luke},\n journal={Mathematics of Computation},\n volume={83},\n number={289},\n pages={2553--2574},\n year={2014}\n}\n\n\n@book{bruns88_deter_rings,\n author = {Bruns, Winfried and Vetter, Udo},\n title = {Determinantal Rings},\n year = 1988,\n publisher = {Springer Berlin Heidelberg},\n series = {Lecture Notes in Mathematics},\n}\n\n@article{duff2025universal,\n title={{Universal Gr{\\\"o}bner Bases of (Universal) Multiview Ideals}},\n author={Duff, Timothy and Kendrick, Jack and Thomas, Rekha R},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.12376},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{bernstein2017completion,\n title={Completion of tree metrics and rank 2 matrices},\n author={Bernstein, Daniel Irving},\n journal={Linear Algebra and its Applications},\n volume={533},\n pages={1--13},\n year={2017},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{duff2026multiprojective,\n title={Multiprojective Geometry of Compatible Triples of Fundamental and Essential Matrices},\n author={Duff, Timothy and Korotynskiy, Viktor and Leykin, Anton and Pajdla, Tomas},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.23450},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@book{villarreal2001monomial,\n title={Monomial algebras},\n author={Villarreal, Rafael H},\n volume={238},\n year={2001},\n publisher={Marcel Dekker New York}\n}\n\n@article{brakensiek2026rigidity,\n title={Rigidity matroids and linear algebraic matroids with applications to matrix completion and tensor codes},\n author={Brakensiek, Joshua and Dhar, Manik and Gao, Jiyang and Gopi, Sivakanth and Larson, Matt},\n journal={Combinatorica},\n volume={46},\n number={2},\n pages={15},\n year={2026},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@book{eisenbud2013commutative,\n title={Commutative algebra: with a view toward algebraic geometry},\n author={Eisenbud, David},\n year={2013},\n publisher={Springer Science \\& Business Media}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{hruby-quadrifocal,\n title={Four-view geometry with unknown radial distortion},\n author={Hruby, Petr and Korotynskiy, Viktor and Duff, Timothy and Oeding, Luke and Pollefeys, Marc and Pajdla, Tomas and Larsson, Viktor},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={8990--9000},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{huang2024fine,\n title={{Fine multidegrees, Universal Gr{\\\"o}bner bases, and matrix Schubert varieties}},\n author={Huang, Daoji and Larson, Matt},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02135},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{nicklasson2025determinantal,\n title={The Determinantal Matroid},\n author={Nicklasson, Lisa and Tsakiris, Manolis C},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18222},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@book{jouanolou1983,\n title={Th{\\'e}or{\\`e}mes de {B}ertini et applications},\n author={Jouanolou, J.P.},\n isbn={9783764331641},\n lccn={83015729},\n series={Progress in mathematics (Birkh{\\\"a}user) 42},\n year={1983},\n publisher={Birkh{\\\"a}user}\n}\n\n@article{oeding2017quadrifocal,\n title={The quadrifocal variety},\n author={Oeding, Luke},\n journal={Linear Algebra and Its Applications},\n volume={512},\n pages={306--330},\n year={2017},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{pratt2025segre,\n title={The {S}egre {D}eterminant},\n author={Pratt, Elizabeth},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09204},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{quan2002two,\n title={Two-way ambiguity in 2{D} projective reconstruction from three uncalibrated 1{D} images},\n author={Quan, Long},\n journal={IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence},\n volume={23},\n number={2},\n pages={212--216},\n year={2002},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n\n@incollection{kileel2022snapshot,\n title={Snapshot of algebraic vision},\n author={Kileel, Joe and Kohn, Kathl{\\'e}n},\n booktitle={Combinatorial, Computational, and Applied Algebraic Geometry: A Tribute to Bernd Sturmfels},\n editor={Hoşten, Serkan and Maclagan, Diane and Sottile, Frank},\n volume={111},\n year={2025},\n publisher={American Mathematical Society}\n}\n\n@book{hartley2003multiple,\n title={Multiple view geometry in computer vision},\n author={Hartley, Richard and Zisserman, Andrew},\n year={2003},\n publisher={Cambridge university press}\n}\n\n@article{agarwal2017existence,\n title={On the existence of epipolar matrices},\n author={Agarwal, Sameer and Lee, Hon-Leung and Sturmfels, Bernd and Thomas, Rekha R},\n journal={International Journal of Computer Vision},\n volume={121},\n number={3},\n pages={403--415},\n year={2017},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{agarwal2026computer,\n title={A Computer Vision Problem in Flatland},\n author={Agarwal, Sameer and Connelly, Erin and Crannell, Annalisa and Duff, Timothy and Thomas, Rekha R},\n journal={SIAM Journal on Applied Algebra and Geometry},\n volume={10},\n number={1},\n pages={14--45},\n year={2026},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091166,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31966"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31966"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Qingyun Liu"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Qingyun Liu, Jiwen Zhang, Jingyi Hu, Siyuan Wang, Zhongyu Wei"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"MECoBench: A Systematic Study of Multimodal Agent Collaboration in Embodied Environments"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"Project website: https://q-i-n-g.github.io/MECoBench-Website/"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.MA cs.AI cs.CL cs.CV"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have strong potential as embodied agents, but their ability to collaborate in visually grounded environments remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce MECoBench, a multimodal embodied cooperation benchmark with an evaluation platform spanning diverse real-world tasks, two cooperation structures, and three collaboration modes. Through extensive experiments across various MLLMs, we summarize three key findings: (i) Collaboration generally improves embodied task completion, but its benefits depend on balancing collaborative gains against coordination complexity. (ii) Communication is essential to collaboration gains, while the best collaboration mode depends on team size and model capability. (iii) Moreover, collaboration improves robustness under noisy priors and exploration conditions. Generally, MECoBench provides a systematic testbed for understanding the mechanisms and limits of multimodal embodied collaboration. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/q-i-n-g/MECoBench."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:07:53 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:07:53 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Liu","Qingyun",""],["Zhang","Jiwen",""],["Hu","Jingyi",""],["Wang","Siyuan",""],["Wei","Zhongyu",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Liu\",\n \"Qingyun\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Zhang\",\n \"Jiwen\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Hu\",\n \"Jingyi\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Wang\",\n \"Siyuan\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Wei\",\n \"Zhongyu\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: acl.sty\n================================================\n% This is the LaTex style file for *ACL.\n% The official sources can be found at\n%\n% https://github.com/acl-org/acl-style-files/\n%\n% This package is activated by adding\n%\n% \\usepackage{acl}\n%\n% to your LaTeX file. When submitting your paper for review, add the \"review\" option:\n%\n% \\usepackage[review]{acl}\n\n\\newif\\ifacl@finalcopy\n\\newif\\ifacl@anonymize\n\\newif\\ifacl@linenumbers\n\\newif\\ifacl@pagenumbers\n\\DeclareOption{final}{\\acl@finalcopytrue\\acl@anonymizefalse\\acl@linenumbersfalse\\acl@pagenumbersfalse}\n\\DeclareOption{review}{\\acl@finalcopyfalse\\acl@anonymizetrue\\acl@linenumberstrue\\acl@pagenumberstrue}\n\\DeclareOption{preprint}{\\acl@finalcopytrue\\acl@anonymizefalse\\acl@linenumbersfalse\\acl@pagenumberstrue}\n\\ExecuteOptions{final} % final copy is the default\n\n% include hyperref, unless user specifies nohyperref option like this:\n% \\usepackage[nohyperref]{acl}\n\\newif\\ifacl@hyperref\n\\DeclareOption{hyperref}{\\acl@hyperreftrue}\n\\DeclareOption{nohyperref}{\\acl@hyperreffalse}\n\\ExecuteOptions{hyperref} % default is to use hyperref\n\\ProcessOptions\\relax\n\n\\typeout{Conference Style for ACL}\n\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\n\\ifacl@linenumbers\n % Add draft line numbering via the lineno package\n % https://texblog.org/2012/02/08/adding-line-numbers-to-documents/\n \\usepackage[switch,mathlines]{lineno}\n\n % Line numbers in gray Helvetica 8pt\n \\font\\aclhv = phvb at 8pt\n \\renewcommand\\linenumberfont{\\aclhv\\color{lightgray}}\n\n % Zero-fill line numbers\n % NUMBER with left flushed zeros \\fillzeros[<WIDTH>]<NUMBER>\n \\newcount\\cv@tmpc@ \\newcount\\cv@tmpc\n \\def\\fillzeros[#1]#2{\\cv@tmpc@=#2\\relax\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@<0\\cv@tmpc@=-\\cv@tmpc@\\fi\n \\cv@tmpc=1 %\n \\loop\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@<10 \\else \\divide\\cv@tmpc@ by 10 \\advance\\cv@tmpc by 1 \\fi\n \\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@=10\\relax\\cv@tmpc@=11\\relax\\fi \\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@>10 \\repeat\n \\ifnum#2<0\\advance\\cv@tmpc1\\relax-\\fi\n \\loop\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc<#1\\relax0\\advance\\cv@tmpc1\\relax\\fi \\ifnum\\cv@tmpc<#1 \\repeat\n \\cv@tmpc@=#2\\relax\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@<0\\cv@tmpc@=-\\cv@tmpc@\\fi \\relax\\the\\cv@tmpc@}%\n \\renewcommand\\thelinenumber{\\fillzeros[3]{\\arabic{linenumber}}}\n \\AtBeginDocument{\\linenumbers}\n\n \\setlength{\\linenumbersep}{1.6cm}\n\n % Bug: An equation with $$ ... $$ isn't numbered, nor is the previous line.\n\n % Patch amsmath commands so that the previous line and the equation itself\n % are numbered. Bug: multline has an extra line number.\n % https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/461186/how-to-use-lineno-with-amsmath-align\n \\usepackage{etoolbox} %% <- for \\pretocmd, \\apptocmd and \\patchcmd\n\n \\newcommand*\\linenomathpatch[1]{%\n \\expandafter\\pretocmd\\csname #1\\endcsname {\\linenomath}{}{}%\n \\expandafter\\pretocmd\\csname #1*\\endcsname {\\linenomath}{}{}%\n \\expandafter\\apptocmd\\csname end#1\\endcsname {\\endlinenomath}{}{}%\n \\expandafter\\apptocmd\\csname end#1*\\endcsname {\\endlinenomath}{}{}%\n }\n \\newcommand*\\linenomathpatchAMS[1]{%\n \\expandafter\\pretocmd\\csname #1\\endcsname {\\linenomathAMS}{}{}%\n \\expandafter\\pretocmd\\csname #1*\\endcsname {\\linenomathAMS}{}{}%\n \\expandafter\\apptocmd\\csname end#1\\endcsname {\\endlinenomath}{}{}%\n \\expandafter\\apptocmd\\csname end#1*\\endcsname {\\endlinenomath}{}{}%\n }\n\n %% Definition of \\linenomathAMS depends on whether the mathlines option is provided\n \\expandafter\\ifx\\linenomath\\linenomathWithnumbers\n \\let\\linenomathAMS\\linenomathWithnumbers\n %% The following line gets rid of an extra line numbers at the bottom:\n \\patchcmd\\linenomathAMS{\\advance\\postdisplaypenalty\\linenopenalty}{}{}{}\n \\else\n \\let\\linenomathAMS\\linenomathNonumbers\n \\fi\n\n \\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\linenomathpatch{equation}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{gather}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{multline}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{align}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{alignat}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{flalign}%\n }\n\\else\n % Hack to ignore these commands, which review mode puts into the .aux file.\n \\newcommand{\\@LN@col}[1]{}\n \\newcommand{\\@LN}[2]{}\n \\newcommand{\\nolinenumbers}{}\n\\fi\n\n\\PassOptionsToPackage{a4paper,margin=2.5cm,heightrounded=true}{geometry}\n\\RequirePackage{geometry}\n\n\\setlength\\columnsep{0.6cm}\n\\newlength\\titlebox\n\\setlength\\titlebox{11\\baselineskip}\n% \\titlebox should be a multiple of \\baselineskip so that\n% column height remaining fits an exact number of lines of text\n\n\\flushbottom \\twocolumn \\sloppy\n\n% We're never going to need a table of contents, so just flush it to\n% save space --- suggested by drstrip@sandia-2\n\\def\\addcontentsline#1#2#3{}\n\n\\ifacl@pagenumbers\n \\pagenumbering{arabic}\n\\else\n \\thispagestyle{empty}\n \\pagestyle{empty}\n\\fi\n\n%% Title and Authors %%\n\n\\let\\Thanks\\thanks % \\Thanks and \\thanks used to be different, but keep this for backwards compatibility.\n\n\\newcommand\\outauthor{%\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\n \\ifacl@anonymize\n \\bfseries Anonymous ACL submission\n \\else\n \\bfseries\\@author\n \\fi\n \\end{tabular}}\n\n% Mostly taken from deproc.\n\\AtBeginDocument{\n\\def\\maketitle{\\par\n \\begingroup\n \\def\\thefootnote{\\fnsymbol{footnote}}\n \\twocolumn[\\@maketitle]\n \\@thanks\n \\endgroup\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}\n \\let\\maketitle\\relax\n \\let\\@maketitle\\relax\n \\gdef\\@thanks{}\\gdef\\@author{}\\gdef\\@title{}\\let\\thanks\\relax}\n\\def\\@maketitle{\\vbox to \\titlebox{\\hsize\\textwidth\n \\linewidth\\hsize \\vskip 0.125in minus 0.125in \\centering\n {\\Large\\bfseries \\@title \\par} \\vskip 0.2in plus 1fil minus 0.1in\n {\\def\\and{\\unskip\\enspace{\\rmfamily and}\\enspace}%\n \\def\\And{\\end{tabular}\\hss \\egroup \\hskip 1in plus 2fil\n \\hbox to 0pt\\bgroup\\hss \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bfseries}%\n \\def\\AND{\\end{tabular}\\hss\\egroup \\hfil\\hfil\\egroup\n \\vskip 0.25in plus 1fil minus 0.125in\n \\hbox to \\linewidth\\bgroup\\large \\hfil\\hfil\n \\hbox to 0pt\\bgroup\\hss \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bfseries}\n \\hbox to \\linewidth\\bgroup\\large \\hfil\\hfil\n \\hbox to 0pt\\bgroup\\hss\n \\outauthor\n \\hss\\egroup\n \\hfil\\hfil\\egroup}\n \\vskip 0.3in plus 2fil minus 0.1in\n}}\n}\n\n% margins and font size for abstract\n\\renewenvironment{abstract}%\n {\\begin{center}\\large\\textbf{\\abstractname}\\end{center}%\n \\begin{list}{}%\n {\\setlength{\\rightmargin}{0.6cm}%\n \\setlength{\\leftmargin}{0.6cm}}%\n \\item[]\\ignorespaces%\n \\@setsize\\normalsize{12pt}\\xpt\\@xpt\n }%\n {\\unskip\\end{list}}\n\n% Resizing figure and table captions - SL\n% Support for interacting with the caption, subfigure, and subcaption packages - SL\n\\RequirePackage{caption}\n\\DeclareCaptionFont{10pt}{\\fontsize{10pt}{12pt}\\selectfont}\n\\captionsetup{font=10pt}\n\n\\RequirePackage{natbib}\n% for citation commands in the .tex, authors can use:\n% \\citep, \\citet, and \\citeyearpar for compatibility with natbib, or\n% \\cite, \\newcite, and \\shortcite for compatibility with older ACL .sty files\n\\renewcommand\\cite{\\citep} % to get \"(Author Year)\" with natbib\n\\newcommand\\shortcite{\\citeyearpar}% to get \"(Year)\" with natbib\n\\newcommand\\newcite{\\citet} % to get \"Author (Year)\" with natbib\n\\newcommand{\\citeposs}[1]{\\citeauthor{#1}'s (\\citeyear{#1})} % to get \"Author's (Year)\"\n\n\\bibliographystyle{acl_natbib}\n\n% Bibliography\n\n% Don't put a label in the bibliography at all. Just use the unlabeled format\n% instead.\n\\def\\thebibliography#1{\\vskip\\parskip%\n\\vskip\\baselineskip%\n\\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n\\ifx\\@currsize\\normalsize\\@normalsize\\else\\@currsize\\fi%\n\\vskip-\\parskip%\n\\vskip-\\baselineskip%\n\\section*{References\\@mkboth\n {References}{References}}\\list\n {}{\\setlength{\\labelwidth}{0pt}\\setlength{\\leftmargin}{\\parindent}\n \\setlength{\\itemindent}{-\\parindent}}\n \\def\\newblock{\\hskip .11em plus .33em minus -.07em}\n \\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000\n \\sfcode`\\.=1000\\relax}\n\\let\\endthebibliography=\\endlist\n\n\n% Allow for a bibliography of sources of attested examples\n\\def\\thesourcebibliography#1{\\vskip\\parskip%\n\\vskip\\baselineskip%\n\\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n\\ifx\\@currsize\\normalsize\\@normalsize\\else\\@currsize\\fi%\n\\vskip-\\parskip%\n\\vskip-\\baselineskip%\n\\section*{Sources of Attested Examples\\@mkboth\n {Sources of Attested Examples}{Sources of Attested Examples}}\\list\n {}{\\setlength{\\labelwidth}{0pt}\\setlength{\\leftmargin}{\\parindent}\n \\setlength{\\itemindent}{-\\parindent}}\n \\def\\newblock{\\hskip .11em plus .33em minus -.07em}\n \\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000\n \\sfcode`\\.=1000\\relax}\n\\let\\endthesourcebibliography=\\endlist\n\n% sections with less space\n\\def\\section{\\@startsection {section}{1}{\\z@}{-2.0ex plus\n -0.5ex minus -.2ex}{1.5ex plus 0.3ex minus .2ex}{\\large\\bfseries\\raggedright}}\n\\def\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}{-1.8ex plus\n -0.5ex minus -.2ex}{0.8ex plus .2ex}{\\normalsize\\bfseries\\raggedright}}\n%% changed by KO to - values to get the initial parindent right\n\\def\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}{-1.5ex plus\n -0.5ex minus -.2ex}{0.5ex plus .2ex}{\\normalsize\\bfseries\\raggedright}}\n\\def\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}{1.5ex plus\n 0.5ex minus .2ex}{-1em}{\\normalsize\\bfseries}}\n\\def\\subparagraph{\\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\\parindent}{1.5ex plus\n 0.5ex minus .2ex}{-1em}{\\normalsize\\bfseries}}\n\n% Footnotes\n\\footnotesep 6.65pt %\n\\skip\\footins 9pt plus 4pt minus 2pt\n\\def\\footnoterule{\\kern-3pt \\hrule width 5pc \\kern 2.6pt }\n\\setcounter{footnote}{0}\n\n% Lists and paragraphs\n\\parindent 1em\n\\topsep 4pt plus 1pt minus 2pt\n\\partopsep 1pt plus 0.5pt minus 0.5pt\n\\itemsep 2pt plus 1pt minus 0.5pt\n\\parsep 2pt plus 1pt minus 0.5pt\n\n\\leftmargin 2em \\leftmargini\\leftmargin \\leftmarginii 2em\n\\leftmarginiii 1.5em \\leftmarginiv 1.0em \\leftmarginv .5em \\leftmarginvi .5em\n\\labelwidth\\leftmargini\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep \\labelsep 5pt\n\n\\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini}\n\\def\\@listii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginii\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 2pt plus 1pt minus 0.5pt\n \\parsep 1pt plus 0.5pt minus 0.5pt\n \\itemsep \\parsep}\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiii\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 1pt plus 0.5pt minus 0.5pt\n \\parsep \\z@ \\partopsep 0.5pt plus 0pt minus 0.5pt\n \\itemsep \\topsep}\n\\def\\@listiv{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiv\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listv{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginv\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listvi{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginvi\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginvi\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\n\\abovedisplayskip 7pt plus2pt minus5pt%\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus3pt%\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 4pt plus3pt minus3pt%\n\n% Less leading in most fonts (due to the narrow columns)\n% The choices were between 1-pt and 1.5-pt leading\n\\def\\@normalsize{\\@setsize\\normalsize{11pt}\\xpt\\@xpt}\n\\def\\small{\\@setsize\\small{10pt}\\ixpt\\@ixpt}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setsize\\footnotesize{10pt}\\ixpt\\@ixpt}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setsize\\scriptsize{8pt}\\viipt\\@viipt}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setsize\\tiny{7pt}\\vipt\\@vipt}\n\\def\\large{\\@setsize\\large{14pt}\\xiipt\\@xiipt}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setsize\\Large{16pt}\\xivpt\\@xivpt}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setsize\\LARGE{20pt}\\xviipt\\@xviipt}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setsize\\huge{23pt}\\xxpt\\@xxpt}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setsize\\Huge{28pt}\\xxvpt\\@xxvpt}\n\n% The hyperref manual (section 9) says hyperref should be loaded after natbib\n\\ifacl@hyperref\n \\PassOptionsToPackage{breaklinks}{hyperref}\n \\RequirePackage{hyperref}\n % make links dark blue\n \\definecolor{darkblue}{rgb}{0, 0, 0.5}\n \\hypersetup{colorlinks=true, citecolor=darkblue, linkcolor=darkblue, urlcolor=darkblue}\n\\else\n % This definition is used if the hyperref package is not loaded.\n % It provides a backup, no-op definiton of \\href.\n % This is necessary because \\href command is used in the acl_natbib.bst file.\n \\def\\href#1#2{{#2}}\n \\usepackage{url}\n\\fi\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: acl_latex.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[11pt]{article}\n\\usepackage{makecell}\n\n% Change \"review\" to \"final\" to generate the final (sometimes called camera-ready) version.\n% Change to \"preprint\" to generate a non-anonymous version with page numbers.\n\\usepackage[preprint]{acl}\n\n% Standard package includes\n\\usepackage{times}\n\\usepackage{latexsym}\n\n% For proper rendering and hyphenation of words containing Latin characters (including in bib files)\n\\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}\n% For Vietnamese characters\n% \\usepackage[T5]{fontenc}\n% See https:/www.latex-project.org/help/documentation/encguide.pdf for other character sets\n\n% This assumes your files are encoded as UTF8\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}\n\\usepackage{multirow}\n% This is not strictly necessary, and may be commented out,\n% but it will improve the layout of the manuscript,\n% and will typically save some space.\n\\usepackage{microtype}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{amssymb}\n% This is also not strictly necessary, and may be commented out.\n% However, it will improve the aesthetics of text in\n% the typewriter font.\n\\usepackage{inconsolata}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{tabularx}\n\\usepackage[table]{xcolor}\n\n%Including images in your LaTeX document requires adding\n%additional package(s)\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{enumitem}\n\\usepackage{algorithm}\n\\usepackage{algorithmic}\n\\setlength{\\abovedisplayskip}{2pt} % 公式上方距离\n\\setlength{\\belowdisplayskip}{2pt} % 公式下方距离\n\\setlength{\\abovedisplayshortskip}{2pt} % 如果公式上方是短行，则用此设置\n\\setlength{\\belowdisplayshortskip}{2pt} % 如果公式下方是短行，则用此设置\n\n\\usepackage{soul}\n\\sethlcolor{yellow!30}\n\n\\newcommand{\\behmark}[1]{\\hl{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\exlabel}[1]{%\n \\textcolor{black!65}{\\textsc{\\scriptsize #1}}\\enspace}\n\n% If the title and author information does not fit in the area allocated, uncomment the following\n%\n%\\setlength\\titlebox{<dim>}\n%\n% and set <dim> to something 5cm or larger.\n\n\\title{MECoBench: A Systematic Study of Multimodal Agent Collaboration in Embodied Environments}\n\n% Author information can be set in various styles:\n% For several authors from the same institution:\n% \\author{Author 1 \\and ... \\and Author n \\\\\n% Address line \\\\ ... \\\\ Address line}\n% if the names do not fit well on one line use\n% Author 1 \\\\ {\\bf Author 2} \\\\ ... \\\\ {\\bf Author n} \\\\\n% For authors from different institutions:\n% \\author{Author 1 \\\\ Address line \\\\ ... \\\\ Address line\n% \\And ... \\And\n% Author n \\\\ Address line \\\\ ... \\\\ Address line}\n% To start a separate ``row'' of authors use \\AND, as in\n% \\author{Author 1 \\\\ Address line \\\\ ... \\\\ Address line\n% \\AND\n% Author 2 \\\\ Address line \\\\ ... \\\\ Address line \\And\n% Author 3 \\\\ Address line \\\\ ... \\\\ Address line}\n\n% \\author{First Author \\\\\n% Affiliation / Address line 1 \\\\\n% Affiliation / Address line 2 \\\\\n% Affiliation / Address line 3 \\\\\n% \\texttt{email@domain} \\\\\\And\n% Second Author \\\\\n% Affiliation / Address line 1 \\\\\n% Affiliation / Address line 2 \\\\\n% Affiliation / Address line 3 \\\\\n% \\texttt{email@domain} \\\\}\n\n\\author{\n \\textbf{Qingyun Liu\\textsuperscript{1\\ensuremath{*}}},\n \\textbf{Jiwen Zhang\\textsuperscript{1\\ensuremath{*}}},\n \\textbf{Jingyi Hu\\textsuperscript{1}},\n \\textbf{Siyuan Wang\\textsuperscript{3\\ensuremath{\\dagger}}},\n \\textbf{Zhongyu Wei\\textsuperscript{1,2\\ensuremath{\\dagger}}}\n% \\\\\n% \\textbf{Fifth Author\\textsuperscript{1,2}},\n% \\textbf{Sixth Author\\textsuperscript{1}},\n% \\textbf{Seventh Author\\textsuperscript{1}},\n% \\textbf{Eighth Author \\textsuperscript{1,2,3,4}},\n% \\\\\n% \\textbf{Ninth Author\\textsuperscript{1}},\n% \\textbf{Tenth Author\\textsuperscript{1}},\n% \\textbf{Eleventh E. Author\\textsuperscript{1,2,3,4,5}},\n% \\textbf{Twelfth Author\\textsuperscript{1}},\n% \\\\\n% \\textbf{Thirteenth Author\\textsuperscript{3}},\n% \\textbf{Fourteenth F. Author\\textsuperscript{2,4}},\n% \\textbf{Fifteenth Author\\textsuperscript{1}},\n% \\textbf{Sixteenth Author\\textsuperscript{1}},\n% \\\\\n% \\textbf{Seventeenth S. Author\\textsuperscript{4,5}},\n% \\textbf{Eighteenth Author\\textsuperscript{3,4}},\n% \\textbf{Nineteenth N. Author\\textsuperscript{2,5}},\n% \\textbf{Twentieth Author\\textsuperscript{1}}\n% \\\\\n\\\\\n \\textsuperscript{1}Fudan University,\n \\textsuperscript{2}Shanghai Innovation Institute,\n \\textsuperscript{3}The Chinese University of Hong Kong\n\\\\\n\\normalsize{\\texttt{\\{qyliu25,jiwenzhang21,jyhu25\\}@m.fudan.edu.cn}}\\\\\n \\normalsize{\\texttt{siyuanwang@cuhk.edu.hk, zywei@fudan.edu.cn}}\n % \\small{\n % \\textbf{Correspondence:} \\href{mailto:email@domain}{email@domain}\n % }\n}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\\maketitle\n\\begingroup\n\\renewcommand{\\thefootnote}{\\fnsymbol{footnote}}\n\\footnotetext[1]{Equal contribution.}\n\\footnotetext[2]{Corresponding author.}\n\\endgroup\n\\begin{abstract}\nRecent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have strong potential as embodied agents, but their ability to collaborate in visually grounded environments remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce MECoBench, a multimodal embodied cooperation benchmark with an evaluation platform spanning diverse real-world tasks, two cooperation structures, and three collaboration modes. Through extensive experiments across various MLLMs, we summarize three key findings: (i) Collaboration generally improves embodied task completion, but its benefits depend on balancing collaborative gains against coordination complexity. (ii) Communication is essential to collaboration gains, while the best collaboration mode depends on team size and model capability. (iii) Moreover, collaboration improves robustness under noisy priors and exploration conditions. Generally, MECoBench provides a systematic testbed for understanding the mechanisms and limits of multimodal embodied collaboration. Code and dataset are available at \\url{https:/github.com/q-i-n-g/MECoBench}.\n% (i) Collaboration generally improves embodied task completion, but its benefits follow an inverted-U trend as team size increases.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\\section{Introduction}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{0pt}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.95\\linewidth]{plots/intro.pdf}\n \\caption{\\textbf{An illustration of realistic scenarios}, where cross-modal multi-agent collaboration significantly improves the efficiency compared with single-agent.\n % An comparison of single-agent and multi-agent execution. \n }\n \\label{fig:intro}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{2pt}\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.12}\n\\caption{\\textbf{Comparison with related benchmarks.}\nMultimodal: Whether agents receive multimodal observations rather than\ntext-only observations.\nCollaboration structure (\\textit{Structure}): I and D denote independent\nand interdependent collaboration.\nCollaboration mode (\\textit{Collab.}): I, C, and D denote isolated,\ncentralized, and decentralized collaboration.\nCommunication medium (\\textit{Comm.}): T and V denote textual and visual communication.\n``--'' indicates no explicit inter-agent communication.}\n\\label{tab:benchmark_comparison}\n\n\\begin{tabular}{lccccccc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Benchmark}\n& \\textbf{Env.}\n& \\textbf{Multimodal}\n& \\textbf{Team size}\n& \\textbf{Structure}\n& \\textbf{Collab.}\n& \\textbf{Comm.}\n& \\textbf{\\#Test cases} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\nFurnMove~\\cite{10.1007/978-3-030-58558-7_28}\n& 3D & \\checkmark & Fixed (2) & D & D & -- & 1,000 \\\\\n\nCoELA~\\cite{ICLR2024_54b8b4e0}\n& 3D & \\texttimes & Fixed (2) & I & D & T & 44 \\\\\n\nRoCoBench~\\cite{10610855}\n& 3D & \\texttimes & Fixed (2--3) & I/D & D & T & 6 \\\\\n\nVillagerBench~\\cite{dong-etal-2024-villageragent} & 3D & \\texttimes & Variable (2--3) & I/D & C & -- & 225 \\\\\n\nPARTNR~\\cite{ICLR2025_a3cf318f}\n& 3D & \\texttimes & Fixed (2) & I & C/D & -- & 1,000 \\\\\n\nTeamCraft~\\cite{long2024teamcraftbenchmarkmultimodalmultiagent}\n& 3D & \\checkmark & Variable (2--4) & I/D & C/D & -- & 950 \\\\\n\nCollab-Overcooked~\\cite{sun-etal-2025-collab}\n& 2D & \\texttimes & Fixed (2) & D & D & T & 30 \\\\\n\nMineCollab~\\cite{white2025collaboratingactionactionmultiagent}\n& 3D & \\texttimes & Variable (2--5) & I & D & T & 184 \\\\\n\nCOOP$^2$~\\cite{yang2026coop2definingobservingrepairing}\n& 2D & \\texttimes & Variable (3/6) & I/D & I/C/D & T & 36 \\\\\n\n\\midrule\n\\textbf{MECoBench}\n& \\textbf{3D}\n& \\checkmark\n& \\textbf{Variable (1--5)}\n& \\textbf{I/D}\n& \\textbf{I/C/D}\n& \\textbf{T/V}\n& \\textbf{192} \\\\\n\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\vspace{-4pt}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\nRecent multimodal large language models (MLLMs)~\\cite{anthropic2026claudeopus47systemcard,openai2026gpt54thinking,googledeepmind2026gemini31pro} have demonstrated strong vision-language understanding and reasoning capabilities, making them promising foundations for embodied agents in interactive environments~\\cite{NEURIPS2023_4ec43957, Szot_2025_CVPR}.\n% that must perceive, reason, and act in interactive environments\nWhile most existing MLLM-based studies focus on single-agent embodied intelligence~\\cite{yang2025embodiedbench,liu2025visualagentbench,Zhang_2025_ICCV}, many real-world tasks such as household assistance require multiple agents to cooperate~\\cite{sycara1998multiagent}, as shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:intro}. \nPrevious works on pure language-based multi-agent framework~\\cite{schmidgall-etal-2025-agent,ICLR2024_6507b115} have proved that such cooperation could improve efficiency and overcome individual capability limits. However, the potential of multi-agent collaboration under multimodal embodied settings remains an underexplored area. \n\nAnswering this is non-trivial, because embodied multi-agent collaboration differs fundamentally from text-based collaboration. Existing multi-agent benchmarks rely on textual task descriptions, shared symbolic states, or pre-processed observations, reducing collaboration to plan coordination or dialogue~\\cite{zhu-etal-2025-multiagentbench, sun-etal-2025-collab,ICLR2024_54b8b4e0,yang2026coop2definingobservingrepairing,agashe-etal-2025-llm}. By contrast, embodied agents must coordinate from partial, dynamically changing visual observations while exploring environments, resolving perceptual inconsistencies, avoiding spatial conflicts, and acting under physical constraints~\\cite{Shridhar_2020_CVPR}. This tightly couples perception, exploration, communication, and coordination, leading to failure modes and emergent behaviors that text-based benchmarks cannot capture~\\cite{Feng2026}. Therefore, it is valuable to systematically study MLLM-based multi-agent collaboration in embodied settings, calling for a new benchmark that supports visually grounded interaction and diverse cooperation patterns.\n\nTo address this gap, we introduce MECoBench, a \\textbf{m}ultimodal \\textbf{e}mbodied \\textbf{co}operation benchmark together with an evaluation platform for systematically analyzing visually grounded embodied multi-agent cooperation. \nMECoBench contains diverse embodied tasks covering eight types of common real-world activities, and introduces two cooperation structures to support realistic evaluation. In parallel cooperation, agents can work on different subtasks simultaneously, whereas in space-constrained sequential cooperation, agents must coordinate in a chained manner to complete the task.\nBeyond task construction, our platform supports controlled variation along multiple dimensions, including collaboration mode, team size and exploration difficulty. This design enables fine-grained analysis of not only whether collaboration helps, but also when, why, and through which mechanisms it improves embodied task solving.\n\n\nBased on MECoBench, our work aims to answer three research questions progressively: \n(i) To what extent does multi-agent collaboration benefit MLLMs on embodied tasks, and how does this benefit change as the team size scales? (ii) How do different collaboration modes and communication mechanisms shape collaboration outcomes? (iii) Does collaboration remain effective and robust under challenging information conditions? To answer these questions, we evaluate a wide range of MLLMs across model families and parameter scales, and obtain the following findings:\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{-4pt}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\textwidth]{plots/data-pp.pdf}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Data construction pipeline of MECoBench}. \n Each task is first grounded from a high-level task into a concrete scene, then set collaboration configuration for parallel or sequential execution.}\n \\label{fig:task_generation}\n\\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*,partopsep=0pt,topsep=0pt]\n\\setlength{\\itemsep}{0pt}\n\\setlength{\\parsep}{0pt}\n\\setlength{\\parskip}{0pt}\n \\item \\textbf{Multi-agent collaboration generally improves embodied task completion, but its benefits depend on balancing gains against coordination complexity.} Most MLLMs exhibit basic collaborative capability and benefit from a second agent participation. As the team grows further, however, performance saturates and then degrades, forming an inverted-U trend and indicating that moderate team sizes provide the best trade-off between parallelism and coordination overhead. Encouragingly, larger teams remain more robust as task complexity increases.\n \n \\item \\textbf{Communication is the key driver of collaboration gains, and the best mode is contingent on both team size and model capability.} Removing communication consistently degrades performance, with \n substantially larger drops on sequential tasks and larger teams. Centralized coordination is most effective in small teams but saturates earlier than decentralized coordination as the team scales. Beyond textual messaging, shared memory yields more efficient collaboration and benefits loosely coupled parallel tasks, while vision-augmented leadership improves coordination efficiency---provided the leader model is capable enough to leverage visual input.\n \n \\item \\textbf{Collaboration further enhances robustness under challenging information conditions.} Two-agent collaboration still improves task completion when location priors are removed and agents must explore from scratch, and yields its largest relative gains under noisy priors, showing that multi-agent teams can compensate for misleading information through communication and distributed exploration. Available task information further amplifies the benefits of collaboration.\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\section{MECoBench}\nTo investigate MLLM-based multi-agent collaboration under embodied settings, we propose \\textbf{MECoBench}, a comprehensive benchmark with an interactive evaluation platform. MECoBench is built upon VirtualHome~\\cite{Puig_2018_CVPR}, a realistic household simulator covering a wide range of everyday scenarios, and spans different collaboration structures, variable team sizes, diverse collaboration modes and communication mechanisms. Table~\\ref{tab:benchmark_comparison} compares MECoBench with existing embodied multi-agent collaboration benchmarks.\n\n\n\\subsection{Benchmark Construction}\nTo cover common real-world activities, we define eight semantic task templates (detailed definition in Table~\\ref{tab:task_templates}), including five adapted from WAH~\\cite{puig2021watchandhelp} and three newly designed. Beyond semantic diversity, we introduce two collaboration structure to capture different forms of spatial accessibility in the real world. In the \\textit{\\textbf{parallel}} setting, all agents can freely access all rooms and complete subgoals independently and concurrently, modeling cases where individuals operate in a shared space. In the \\textit{\\textbf{sequential}} setting, agents are assigned to disjoint room zones, making inter-agent object transfers necessary and reflecting situations where individuals have access to different regions and must coordinate across spatial boundaries.\n\nThe final task is constructed through a two-stage pipeline shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:task_generation}. In the scene grounding stage, we firstly sample subgoals from a task template, and then randomly place the selected goal objects at legal initial locations. We define a broad range of surfaces and containers to enable diverse and realistic object distributions (listed in Table~\\ref{tab:legal-placement}). After a task scene is instantiated, we further assign its collaboration structure. Under sequential settings, the apartment is partitioned into disjoint room zones based on the initial locations of task objects and their target goal locations, and different zones are assigned to different agents. \n\nOverall, MECoBench consists of 96 tasks, each evaluated under both parallel and sequential setups, yielding 192 test cases in total. Each task contains 2–7 subgoals. The scenes are uniformly distributed over both the number of subgoals and the eight task templates to ensure balanced task complexity and scenario diversity.\nDetails of construction and statistic are in Appendix~\\ref{app:benchmark}.\n\n\\subsection{Evaluation Platform}\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{0pt}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.8\\linewidth]{plots/comm.pdf}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Illustration of four protocols under three collaboration modes}.}\n \\label{fig:2-1-protocol}\n\\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{figure}\n\\begin{figure*}[!t]\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{0pt}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\textwidth]{plots/eval-pp.pdf}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Overall workflow of evaluation.} Agents receive task goals and prior information, perceive the environment, communicate under different protocols, reason with history and memory, and execute actions with feedback.}\n \\label{fig:workflow}\n\\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{figure*}\n\nThe platform supports a flexible number of agents and provides three collaboration modes with four basic protocols to enable systematic evaluation.\n\n\\paragraph{Collaboration Mode}\nTo analyze how different coordination structures shape multi-agent performance, we design three collaboration modes implemented with four protocols as summarized in Figure~\\ref{fig:2-1-protocol}.\nThe \\textbf{isolated} mode \\textit{disables communication}, requiring agents to act independently. \nThe \\textbf{decentralized} mode enables peer-level coordination through \\textit{broadcast} or \\textit{discussion}. In broadcast, each agent shares one message with all others before action; in discussion, agents communicate sequentially and can continue for another round when consensus is not reached. \nThe \\textbf{centralized} mode assigns one agent as \\textit{leader} to aggregate worker reports and assign actions to the team.\n\n\\paragraph{Evaluation Pipeline}\n\nAs illustrated in Figure~\\ref{fig:workflow}, we formulate the evaluation as an iterative \\emph{observe--communicate--act} workflow. At the beginning of each task,\nthe environment is initialized with the task scene graph and $N$ agents. Each agent is placed in its assigned initial room with the provided task goal $G$, the available prior information $I$, and the shared action space $A$ (see Appendix~\\ref{app:action}).\nAt each timestep $t$, each agent $i$ obtains a panoramic environment observation $O_t^i$ from its first-person view. To support long-horizon execution over dozens of steps, the agent reasons not only over its current observation $O_t^i$, but also over its action history $h_{a,t}^i$, recent dialogue history $h_{d,t}$, self-maintained memory $M_t^i$, and initial information $I$. Depending on the chosen collaboration protocol $P$, each agent $i$ first generates the communication message $c_t^i$ as\n\\begin{equation}\nc_t^i = P_i(O_t^i, h_{a,t}^i, h_{d,t}, M_t^i, G, I).\n\\end{equation}\nThe messages from all agents form the communication context $C_t = \\{c_t^1, c_t^2, \\ldots, c_t^N\\}$.\nAfter communication, each agent generates its next action conditioned on the\ncurrent communication context:\n\\begin{equation}\na_t^i = \\pi_i(O_t^i, C_t, h_{a,t}^i, M_t, G, I, A),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\pi_i$ denotes the action policy of agent $i$. The selected actions are executed in simulator, which returns execution feedback $F_t$ and resulting environment changes. Finally, the feedback is used to update the history and memory. This workflow continues until the task is completed or the maximum number of steps is reached.\n\n\n\\section{Experiment Setup}\n\n\\subsection{Implementation Details} For parallel tasks, we compare single-agent and two-agent execution under the same effective 60-step budget, defined as the total number of steps across all agents. Thus, for an n-agent team, each agent is allocated 60/n steps. \nFor sequential tasks, we use a fixed two-agent setup with an 80-step budget. \nUnless otherwise specified, we use the broadcast collaboration protocol in all multi-agent settings. \n\nBy default, we provide the task object appearance and possible location list to agents as the prior information $I$ at initialization. Since MECoBench focuses on collaboration rather than object search, this prior reduces localization difficulty and better isolates cooperative ability. More detials are in Appendix~\\ref{app:eval-setup}.\n\n\\subsection{Evaluation Metrics}\nWe evaluate multi-agent collaboration from three aspects: \\textbf{(1) Effectiveness}: \\textit{Success Rate (SR)}, defined as the proportion of successful cases, and \\textit{Completion Rate (CR)}, defined as the average fraction of completed subgoals across cases. \\textbf{(2) Efficiency}: \\textit{Step-CR AUC (AUC)}, measuring the area under the completion-rate curve over equivalent steps, and \\textit{Average Token Cost per Step}. \\textbf{(3) Collaboration quality}: \\textit{Division of Labor (DOL)}, \\textit{Conflict Action Rate (CAR)}, and \\textit{Handover Failure Rate (HFR)}. DOL measures the distribution of subgoal completion across agents, calculated as\n\\begin{equation}\ns_i=\\frac{\\mathrm{count}_i}{\\sum_j \\mathrm{count}_j}, \\quad\n\\mathrm{DOL}=\\frac{1-\\sum_i s_i^2}{1-\\frac{1}{n}}.\n\\end{equation}\nwhere \\(n>1\\) is the number of agents, and \\(s_i\\) denotes the fraction of subgoals completed by agent \\(i\\) among all completed subgoals.\nCAR measures the average fraction of conflicting actions between agents, such as grabbing or opening the same object. HFR measures the average fraction of failed handovers in sequential tasks.\n\n\\subsection{Evaluated Models} We evaluate a diverse set of both closed-source and open-source models.\nThe closed-source models include state-of-art model GPT-5.4~\\cite{openai2026gpt54thinking}, Gemini-3.1-Pro~\\cite{googledeepmind2026gemini31pro}, and GPT-5-mini~\\cite{openai2025gpt5mini}\nThe open-source models include Qwen3-VL~\\cite{bai2025qwen3vltechnicalreport}, Qwen3.5~\\cite{qwen3.5}, Gemma4~\\cite{googledeepmind2026gemma4modelcard}, InternVL 3.5~\\cite{wang2025internvl35advancingopensourcemultimodal}, Llama4~\\cite{meta2025llama4modelcard} and GLM 4.6V~\\cite{vteam2025glm45vglm41vthinkingversatilemultimodal}, covering model sizes from 8B to 235B parameters. Appendix~\\ref{app:model} lists all models evaluated.\n\n\n\n\\section{Will Multi-agent Collaboration Benefit Embodied Task Completion?}\n\\label{sec:exp-1}\n\n\\subsection{Do Models Know How To Collaborate? }\n\\begin{figure}[h]\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{0pt}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{exp_fig/scatter_quartile.pdf}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Comparison of model performance between parallel single-agent and sequential two-agent settings.} Dashed lines indicate quartile thresholds.}\n \\label{fig:1-1-overall}\n\\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{figure}\n\\paragraph{Can models collaborate when collaboration is necessary?} We compare the model performance under single- and two-agent settings, using parallel single-agent and sequential two-agent results as proxies for individual and collaborative ability, respectively.\nAs demonstrated in Figure~\\ref{fig:1-1-overall}, single-agent performance on parallel tasks correlates positively with two-agent collaboration performance on sequential tasks, while the sequential success rates are generally lower. This suggests that spatial constraints make collaboration harder than individual execution, while \\textbf{most models still exhibit basic collaborative capability}. Among these models, GPT-5.4 and GPT-5-mini achieve the best overall performance, and Gemma4 series performs particularly well on collaboration tasks. In contrast, InternVL3.5 performs well individually but struggles to cooperate, revealing a gap between individual execution and group collaboration.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{0pt}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{exp_fig/2agent_gain_sr_cr.pdf}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Performance change from 1-agent to 2-agent under parallel settings.} Bars show the absolute change in SR and CR (percentage points)}\n \\label{fig:1-1-gain}\n\\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\paragraph{Can models benefit from collaboration when it is optional?} Compared with single agent, Figure~\\ref{fig:1-1-gain} shows that \\textbf{most models benefit from the participation of a second agent}. \nThe improvement is particularly large for weak and mid-level models, likely because their single-agent baselines leave more room for gains. Notably, InternVL3.5 series exhibits a clear performance drop, further confirming its weakness in multi-agent coordination. Detailed results and analyses are provided in Appendix~\\ref{app:main_results}.\n\n\\subsection{Do More Agents Always Help?}\n\\begin{figure}[h]\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{0pt}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{exp_fig/RQ12/num-agent.pdf}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Team size scaling effect.} (a) Performance curve of different team size. (b) SR of Qwen3-32B-VL versus the \\#objects, with fitted trend lines for different team sizes. }\n \\label{fig:agent-number-complexity}\n\\vspace{-12pt}\n\\end{figure}\n\nTo investigate this, we increase the number of agents from one to five under parallel settings with fixed effective step budget.\nResults are shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:agent-number-complexity}(a), where \\textbf{collaboration performance generally follows an inverted-U-shaped trend}: adding agents initially improves performance, but further scaling leads to saturation and then degradation. \nOverall, moderate team sizes strike the best balance between collaboration benefits and costs.\n\nWe further analyze the effect of task complexity using object count as a proxy. Figure~\\ref{fig:agent-number-complexity}(b) shows that success rates decline with increasing object count, due to longer trajectories and greater planning difficulty (see Appendix~\\ref{app:obj-num} for full results across all models and task conditions). Nevertheless, \\textbf{multi-agent settings maintain more robust performance under high-complexity tasks}, highlighting the value of collaboration in complex embodied scenarios.\n\n\\subsection{How Do Agents Collaborate?}\n\\label{sec:how-agent-collab}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{0pt}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\linewidth]{exp_fig/RQ12/render.pdf}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Comparison of collaboration modes.} (a) Performance profiles in 2-agent setup on parallel and sequential tasks. (b) SR and CR trends with increasing team size under decentralized broadcast and centralized leader-based.}\n \\label{fig:comm-mode-analysis}\n\\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{figure*}\nWe delve deeper into fine-grained collaborative behaviors to understand how agents collaborate in practice. \nThese behaviors are identified from the agents' communication and action trajectories using keyword-based matching rules, and are organized into three categories, as reported in Table~\\ref{tab:micro_behavior}. Examples are provided in Appendix~\\ref{app:4.3}.\n\n\\paragraph{Information Sharing} Agents share their intended plans (\\textit{Info-Plan}), current locations (\\textit{Info-Loc}), and detected task-relevant objects (\\textit{Info-Obj}). \\textbf{Plan and location sharing are frequent and consistently beneficial}, while object discovery reporting shows mixed effects.\n\n\\paragraph{Task Coordination} Action-level delegation (\\textit{Act-Del}) issues concrete executable requests, such as asking another agent to grab, check, or place, and brings the strongest gains in both parallel and sequential tasks. In contrast, task assignment (\\textit{Task-Assign}) provides coarser responsibility divisions, such as assigning rooms, areas, or subtasks, and offers only marginal benefit in parallel tasks while hurting sequential ones. \\textbf{More specific and actionable communication is easier to translate into successful execution.}\n\n\\paragraph{Alignment and Correction} Coordination query (\\textit{Coord-Q.}) refers to questions that synchronize teammates' states or locations. It occurs more often in sequential tasks where object transfer requires repeated position checks and serves as an indicator of task and coordination difficulty. \\textit{Correct.} denotes behavioral correction through self-reflection or peer feedback. Despite its negative SR correlation, it consistently improves CR in both settings, suggesting that \\textbf{correction serves as an error-recovery mechanism that improves task progress even when full success is unrecoverable.}\nMore analysis provided in Appendix~\\ref{app:4.3}.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{2pt}\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3pt}\n\\scriptsize\n\\caption{\\textbf{Fine-grained collaborative behaviors across all models.} Freq. denotes the percentage of cases containing\neach behavior. $\\Delta$SR and $\\Delta$CR are percentage-point differences\nbetween cases with and without the behavior.}\n\\resizebox{\\columnwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{@{}lcccccc@{}}\n\\toprule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Behav.}}\n& \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\textbf{Parallel}}\n& \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\textbf{Sequential}} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){2-4}\\cmidrule(lr){5-7}\n& \\textbf{Freq.} & $\\boldsymbol{\\Delta}$\\textbf{SR}\n& $\\boldsymbol{\\Delta}$\\textbf{CR}\n& \\textbf{Freq.} & $\\boldsymbol{\\Delta}$\\textbf{SR}\n& $\\boldsymbol{\\Delta}$\\textbf{CR} \\\\\n\\midrule\nInfo-Plan\n& 75.6\\% & +4.6$\\uparrow$ & +2.8$\\uparrow$\n& 86.3\\% & +16.9$\\uparrow$ & +18.0$\\uparrow$ \\\\\n\nAct-Del.\n& 57.1\\% & +12.2$\\uparrow$ & +7.7$\\uparrow$\n& 54.3\\% & +13.1$\\uparrow$ & +19.2$\\uparrow$ \\\\\n\nInfo-Loc.\n& 47.3\\% & +9.1$\\uparrow$ & +6.9$\\uparrow$\n& 68.0\\% & +7.6$\\uparrow$ & +13.3$\\uparrow$ \\\\\n\nInfo-Obj.\n& 25.9\\% & +5.0$\\uparrow$ & +3.9$\\uparrow$\n& 16.3\\% & -6.7$\\downarrow$ & -1.6$\\downarrow$ \\\\\n\nCoord-Q.\n& 17.6\\% & -10.1$\\downarrow$ & -1.8$\\downarrow$\n& 48.5\\% & -15.5$\\downarrow$ & -6.7$\\downarrow$ \\\\\n\nCorrect.\n& 16.9\\% & -6.7$\\downarrow$ & +1.6$\\uparrow$\n& 6.9\\% & -11.3$\\downarrow$ & +7.7$\\uparrow$ \\\\\n\nTask-Assign\n& 15.7\\% & +1.9$\\approx$ & +2.9$\\uparrow$\n& 8.5\\% & -11.5$\\downarrow$ & -4.9$\\downarrow$ \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n}\n\\label{tab:micro_behavior}\n\\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\section{What Makes Multi-agent Collaboration Effective?}\n\\label{sec:exp-2}\nWe answer this question along two dimensions: \\textbf{collaboration mode} and \\textbf{communication mechanism}. We first examine which collaboration mode is most effective. We then study the role of communication by testing whether it is necessary and whether alternative mechanisms further improve collaboration.\n\n\\subsection{Which Collaboration Mode Works Best?}\n\\paragraph{Two-Agent Collaboration.} We compare different collaboration modes beyond basic broadcast mechanism. As shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:comm-mode-analysis}(a), leader-based collaboration achieves the best overall performance for most models, suggesting that \\textbf{centralized collaboration helps small teams allocate tasks and avoid spatial conflicts}. However, GPT-5.4 remains competitive with simple broadcast communication, indicating that stronger models may rely less on structured collaboration mode.\n\n\\paragraph{Scaling to Larger Teams.} We further examine how collaboration modes scale with team size on parallel tasks. Figure~\\ref{fig:comm-mode-analysis}(b) illustrates that centralized coordination is effective in small teams but saturates as team size increases, while decentralized coordination becomes more competitive by avoiding the bottleneck of relying on a single leader to aggregate information and assign actions. Moreover, under centralized coordination, model capability matters, as Qwen3-32B-VL benefits from three agents, whereas Qwen3-8B-VL peaks at two agents and then degrades. Therefore, \\textbf{the best collaboration mode depends on both team size and model capability}. Full results across all metrics and team sizes are provided in Appendix~\\ref{app:collab-mode}.\n\n\\subsection{Is Communication Necessary?}\n% \\vspace{-4pt}\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{0pt}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{exp_fig/RQ12/no-comm.pdf}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Ablation study on communication.} (a) Performance change when remove communication. (b) Performance across different team sizes.}\n \\label{fig:role_of_communication}\n\\vspace{-4pt}\n\\end{figure}\nWe ablate communication from the broadcast protocol under both parallel and sequential settings. As shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:role_of_communication}, disabling communication consistently degrades performance across models, with a much larger drop on sequential tasks. When the number of agents grows, the gap between communication and no communication widens. These results indicate that \\textbf{communication is essential for effective collaboration}, especially when tasks require stronger coordination or involve larger teams. More details in Appendix~\\ref{app:comm-role}.\n% \\vspace{-4pt}\n\\subsection{Is Textual Communication Enough?}\n\nWhile explicit textual communication is essential, it may be insufficient for embodied collaboration, where agents must share evolving task states and visually grounded observations. We therefore explore two alternative communication mechanisms: \\textit{shared memory} and \\textit{vision-augmented leadership}.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{0pt}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{exp_fig/shared_memory_and_vision/shared-memory.pdf}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Comparison between broadcast and shared-memory}. \n(a) Relative changes in effectiveness and efficiency over broadcast of Qwen3-VL. \n(b) Average completion progress over steps under broadcast and shared-memory of Qwen3-32B-VL.}\n \\label{fig:3-1-shared-memory}\n\\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\paragraph{Shared memory leads to efficient and effective collaboration.}\nIn shared memory, agents skip explicit message exchange and coordinate through a shared memory block. As shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:3-1-shared-memory}, this mechanism improves the performance and greatly reduces token consumption, indicating more efficient collaboration (absolute results in Figure~\\ref{fig:d4}). It consistently improves success rate on parallel tasks, but degrades on sequential tasks, where precise timing and spatial alignment may still require explicit communication. Nevertheless, shared memory accelerates early progress, reducing more conflicts than broadcast under smaller step budgets.\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[h]\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{0pt}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{exp_fig/shared_memory_and_vision/mm_absolute.pdf}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Comparison in leader-based collaboration with and without visual augmentation.}}\n \\label{fig:3-2-leader-mm}\n\\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\paragraph{Vision-augmented leadership helps when the leader is capable.}\nTo give the leader more grounded context, in vision-augmented leader-worker collaboration, we allow workers to send both textual reports and current visual observations to the leader. As shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:3-2-leader-mm}, additional visual information improves AUC for both models, while its impact on SR and CR varies across models. This difference may stem from models' different abilities to effectively use visual cues. Models with stronger visual capabilities (Gemma4-31B), benefit from the additional visual input, whereas weaker models (Qwen3-32B-VL) drop.\n\n\\section{Is Multi-Agent Collaboration Robust?}\nWe examine robustness from two perspectives: the sensitivity of collaboration to\nimperfect prior information, and the failure modes that arise under collaboration.\nAdditional prior information ablations and mixed-model team experiments are deferred to Appendix~\\ref{app:mix-team} and \\ref{para:info-ablation}.\n\n\\label{sec:exp-3}\n\n\\subsection{Does Collaboration Remain Effective Under Imperfect Information?}\nAt initialization, we provide all task-relevant object locations in the prior information $I$, which is hard to obtain in real scenarios. Therefore, we further investigate the collaboration under two realistic settings: (1) \\textit{Missing location priors}: object locations are removed from the prior information, requiring agents to find targets through visual search. (2) \\textit{Noisy location priors}: an additional 30\\% false object locations are injected into the provided prior information. \nWe extend the effective step budget to 80 steps to allow sufficient search, and apply parallel settings with basic broadcast protocol. \n\\begin{figure}[t]\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{0pt}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{exp_fig/no_loc/2agent_dumbbell.pdf}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Performance change under parallel settings without prior location information.}}\n \\label{fig:4-1-no-loc}\n\\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{0pt}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.95\\linewidth]{exp_fig/no_loc/num-agent-no-loc.pdf}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Team size scaling effect without prior location information.} (a) Performance curve of different team size. (b) SR of Qwen3-32B-VL versus the \\#objects, with fitted trend lines for different team sizes.}\n \\label{fig:noloc-analysis}\n\\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{figure}\n\nAs shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:4-1-no-loc}, two-agent collaboration improves the success rate and reduces the conflicts, indicating that collaboration remains useful when task information is incomplete. \nWhen the number of agents is further increased, a similar inverted-U-shaped trend emerges, as shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:noloc-analysis}(a), while performance remains more stable on complex tasks. Moreover, Table~\\ref{tab:noise_no_location} demonstrates that collaboration achieves the largest relative performance gains when the information contains noise, suggesting that agents can compensate for misleading information through communication and distributed exploration. These results together validate that \\textbf{multi-agent collaboration is robust to insufficient and noisy information}. \n\n\\begin{table}[!t]\n\\centering\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{2pt}\n\\footnotesize\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3pt}\n\\caption{\n\\textbf{Performance under noisy and incomplete task information.}\nWe compare three settings: noisy location priors (\\textbf{W/ Noise}), clean location priors (\\textbf{W/o Noise}), and no location priors (\\textbf{W/o Loc.}). \nEach cell reports relative SR gain on top, with the corresponding 1-agent SR $\\to$ 2-agent SR shown below.\n}\n\\begin{tabular}{lccc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Model} \n& \\textbf{W/ Noise} \n& \\textbf{W/o Noise} \n& \\textbf{W/o Loc.} \\\\\n\\midrule\nGPT-5-mini \n& \\makecell{\\textbf{+8.22\\%}\\\\{\\scriptsize 76.04$\\to$82.29}}\n& \\makecell{\\textbf{+1.16\\%}\\\\{\\scriptsize 90.62$\\to$91.67}}\n& \\makecell{\\textbf{+6.47\\%}\\\\{\\scriptsize 32.29$\\to$34.38}} \\\\\nQwen3-32B\n& \\makecell{\\textbf{+28.83\\%}\\\\{\\scriptsize 54.17$\\to$69.79}}\n& \\makecell{\\textbf{+28.57\\%}\\\\{\\scriptsize 58.33$\\to$75.00}}\n& \\makecell{\\textbf{+18.88\\%}\\\\{\\scriptsize 21.88$\\to$26.04}} \\\\\nQwen3.5-9B \n& \\makecell{\\textbf{+4.01\\%}\\\\{\\scriptsize 78.12$\\to$81.25}}\n& \\makecell{\\textbf{+3.52\\%}\\\\{\\scriptsize 85.42$\\to$88.54}}\n& \\makecell{\\textbf{+0.00\\%}\\\\{\\scriptsize 29.17$\\to$29.17}} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\label{tab:noise_no_location}\n\\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{table}\n\n\n\\subsection{Where Does Collaboration Break Down?}\n\\label{sec:fail}\nWe identify two major failure modes in multi-agent collaboration. These failures suggest that robust multi-agent embodied collaboration requires conflict resolution and belief verification mechanisms. Examples and more statistics in Appendix~\\ref{app:fail}.\n\n\\textbf{Multiple agents can introduce conflicts}, including duplicate grabs, repeated labor, and redundant exploration. Although communication mitigates these conflicts for most models, InternVL3.5-241B still exhibits the highest duplicate-grab rates among 2-agent setup of 21.9\\%, partly explaining its performance drop in Figure~\\ref{fig:1-1-gain}. This also explains why performance drop with large team size: for Qwen3-32B-VL, scaling to five agents increases duplicate grabs to 57.4\\%.\n\n\\textbf{Hallucinated beliefs can propagate across agents.} When one agent falsely believes the task is complete and broadcasts it, the team may stop prematurely. Although rare (1\\%-1.5\\%), such hallucinated completion is highly destructive, causing a 73.7\\% SR drop in parallel tasks and a 40.9\\% drop in sequential tasks. Object confusion can similarly cause agents to skip unfinished subtasks.\n\n\n\\section{Related Work}\n\n\\paragraph{Multi-Agent System}\nInspired by human society, multi-agent systems (MAS) have been studied as a way to improve task efficiency and effectiveness~\\cite{Stone2000}. Recent work has explored LLM-based MAS across diverse domains, including automated research~\\cite{schmidgall-etal-2025-agent,su-etal-2025-many}, programming~\\cite{ICLR2024_6507b115,islam-etal-2025-codesim}, medical decision-making~\\cite{fan-etal-2025-ai,Chen2025MAC}, and social simulation~\\cite{piao2025agentsociety}. \nOther studies further examine their scalability and emergent collaborative behaviors~\\cite{ICLR2025_66a026c0,ICLR2024_578e65cd}. Although recent work has begun to explore embodied multi-agent scenarios~\\cite{ICLR2025_7d03c6bf,10504634}, multimodal embodied collaboration remains underexplored~\\cite{yu2024minelandsimulatinglargescalemultiagent}.\n\n\\paragraph{Embodied Agent}\nRecent studies have explored LLM- or MLLM-based embodied agents for a wide range of tasks, including object manipulation~\\cite{Yang_2024_CVPR,monwilliams2025embodied}, navigation~\\cite{zhang2024navid}, complex perception-interaction tasks~\\cite{szot2024large}, and embodied human-AI collaboration~\\cite{ICLR2025_a3cf318f}. \nSeveral benchmarks have also been proposed to evaluate embodied agents across diverse environments and capabilities~\\cite{NEURIPS2022_27c546ab,Savva_2019_ICCV,yang2025embodiedbench,cheng2025embodiedevalevaluatemultimodalllms}. However, these benchmarks predominantly focus on single-agent settings, providing limited support for studying collaboration among multiple embodied agents.\n\n\\paragraph{Embodied Multi-Agent Collaboration Benchmarks} \nSeveral benchmarks have been proposed to evaluate embodied multi-agent collaboration~\\cite{NEURIPS2025_ab16cc8f,puig2021watchandhelp,10.1007/978-3-030-58558-7_28,NEURIPS2019_f5b1b89d,agashe-etal-2025-llm}. Many are built on 2D games~\\cite{sun-etal-2025-collab,yang2026coop2definingobservingrepairing}, offering limited support for physical interaction and spatial reasoning. Existing 3D benchmarks often convert visual observations into textual descriptions~\\cite{ICLR2024_54b8b4e0,10610855,ICLR2025_a3cf318f,dong-etal-2024-villageragent,white2025collaboratingactionactionmultiagent}, decoupling visual grounding and exploration from collaborative decision-making and overlooking behaviors unique to multimodal embodied interaction. \nSome recent benchmarks support multimodal observations~\\cite{NEURIPS2025_ab16cc8f,NEURIPS2025_6b8cb6b2,zha2026aircopbench}, but mainly evaluate visual question answering or offline reasoning rather than closed-loop interaction. TeamCraft~\\cite{long2024teamcraftbenchmarkmultimodalmultiagent} takes an initial step toward evaluating embodied MLLM collaboration, but does not systematically study how communication mechanisms, coordination modes, and team size shape collaboration.\n\n\\section{Conclusion}\nWe empirically investigate how MLLM-based agents collaborate in embodied environments by constructing MECoBench, a multimodal embodied cooperation benchmark. \nThrough controlled experiments and analyses, our results demonstrate that effective coordination can substantially improve both task performance and efficiency. By systematically examining collaboration modes and communication mechanisms, we reveal how these factors shape collaborative performance. We further evaluate collaboration under noisy and incomplete prior information, demonstrating its robustness in more challenging settings. Beyond aggregate performance, we identify emergent collaborative behaviors and failure patterns, explaining both the benefits of collaboration and the new challenges it introduces. Overall, our study provides a deeper understanding of MLLM-based embodied collaboration and introduces a benchmark for evaluating the collaborative capabilities of future MLLMs.\n\n\n\\section*{Limitations}\nIn this work, we propose MECoBench and conduct systematic experiments to study cooperative behaviors of MLLM-based agents in embodied environments. Our analysis reveals several non-trivial patterns in multi-agent collaboration, but there remain several limitations for future work.\n\n\\paragraph{Expanding tasks and scenarios.} MECoBench and corresponding evaluation platform is currently built on VirtualHome, an indoor simulator focused on household scenarios. As a result, our tasks are mainly limited to everyday indoor activities and object interactions. Future work can extend the benchmark to more diverse environments, such as open-world or outdoor scenes, and incorporate broader task types such as navigation and long-horizon exploration.\n\n\\paragraph{Data scale.} MECoBench contains 96 cases from 8 task types under two major task setups. This scale is sufficient for controlled evaluation and for revealing key collaboration patterns, but it remains relatively small compared with the diversity and complexity of real-world embodied tasks. Future work can expand the number of task instances, object categories, scene layouts, and collaboration requirements.\n\n\\paragraph{Agent scaling.}\nDue to spatial constraints in the environment and the complexity of task execution, our experiments scale the team size up to 5 agents. Larger teams and more complex tasks are therefore left unexplored. \n\n\\bibliography{custom}\n\\begin{table*}[!t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{8pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.15}\n\\caption{Task templates used in our benchmark. Each task is defined by a set of target predicates, where \\texttt{ON(obj, rec)} and \\texttt{IN(obj, rec)} denote placing a surface on or inside a container, respectively.}\n\\begin{tabular}{ll}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Task Name} & \\textbf{Predicate Set} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\nSelf-caring\n& \\makecell[l]{\nON(toothbrush, bathroomcounter), ON(toothpaste, bathroomcounter),\\\\\nON(towel, bathroomcounter), ON(barsoap, bathroomcounter)\n} \\\\\n\n\\midrule\nWork on desk\n& \\makecell[l]{\nON(keyboard, desk), ON(mouse, desk),\\\\\nON(cellphone, desk), ON(mug, desk)\n} \\\\\n\n\\midrule\nGaming setup\n& \\makecell[l]{\nON(boardgame, coffeetable), ON(remotecontrol, coffeetable),\\\\\nON(magazine, coffeetable), ON(toy, coffeetable),\\\\\nON(book, coffeetable)\n} \\\\\n\n\\midrule\nPrepare afternoon tea\n& \\makecell[l]{\nON(cupcake, coffeetable), ON(juice, coffeetable),\\\\\nON(wine, coffeetable), ON(pudding, coffeetable),\\\\\nON(apple, coffeetable)\n} \\\\\n\n\\midrule\nWash dishes\n& \\makecell[l]{\nIN(plate, dishwasher), IN(waterglass, dishwasher),\\\\\nIN(wineglass, dishwasher), IN(cutleryfork, dishwasher)\n} \\\\\n\n\\midrule\nPrepare food\n& \\makecell[l]{\nON(cupcake, kitchentable), ON(juice, kitchentable),\\\\\nON(pancake, kitchentable), ON(poundcake, kitchentable),\\\\\nON(wine, kitchentable), ON(pudding, kitchentable),\\\\\nON(apple, kitchentable), ON(coffeepot, kitchentable)\n} \\\\\n\n\\midrule\nPut food inside fridge\n& \\makecell[l]{\nIN(cupcake, fridge), IN(juice, fridge),\\\\\nIN(pancake, fridge), IN(poundcake, fridge),\\\\\nIN(wine, fridge), IN(pudding, fridge),\\\\\nIN(apple, fridge)\n} \\\\\n\n\\midrule\nSetup dinner table\n& \\makecell[l]{\nON(plate, kitchentable), ON(waterglass, kitchentable),\\\\\nON(wineglass, kitchentable), ON(cutleryfork, kitchentable)\n} \\\\\n\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\label{tab:task_templates}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\newpage\n\\\n\\newpage\n\n\\appendix\n\n\\section{MECoBench}\n\\label{app:benchmark}\nThis section presents detailed information about MECoBench, covering its task definitions, benchmark statistics, and construction details.\n\n\\subsection{Task definition}\nTable~\\ref{tab:task_templates} shows the detailed templates of the eight task types designed for MECoBench. \\textit{Self-caring}, \\textit{work-on-desk}, and \\textit{gaming setup} are three newly introduced types, while \\textit{prepare afternoon tea}, \\textit{wash dishes}, \\textit{prepare food}, \\textit{put food inside the fridge}, and \\textit{setup dinner table} are modified from WAH. Figure~\\ref{fig:task-example} gives an example of final task goal of gaming setup.\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\linewidth]{appendix/task_data/task_example.pdf}\n \\caption{Example of task goal content. The goal specifies target objects, their possible locations highlighted in blue, and appearance descriptions highlighted in orange.}\n \\label{fig:task-example}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Benchmark construction details}\nThe construction of MECoBench tasks follows a two-step pipeline. In step one, task templates are instantiated into concrete scenes with randomized object placement and validated for feasibility.\n\n\\paragraph{Goal Sampling.} \nFor a given task type, we sample subgoals from predefined object-count ranges, specifying the target objects, required counts, and optional room or surface constraints. To mitigate visibility issues such as occlusion, we add 0--2 redundant instances for each target object category during scene instantiation. For large objects that occupy more surface space, such as keyboards, boardgames, and magazines, the redundancy is limited to 0--1 instance.\n\n\\paragraph{Scene Instantiation and Object Placement.} \nOnce a template is sampled, the target objects are assigned to legal initial locations based on the predefined legal placement (Table~\\ref{tab:legal-placement}). Objects are placed randomly while respecting constraints:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item No object is placed on the same surfaces or containers that are reserved for other goal locations.\n \\item Surface space is checked to ensure sufficient area for the object.\n \\item Containers are verified for available slots using their bounding boxes.\n\\end{itemize}\nThis procedure ensures that the initial scene is diverse yet consistent with the task template.\n\n\\label{appendix:data-pp}\n\\begin{table}[ht]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n\\caption{Legal placement locations used for randomized object initialization in MECoBench.}\n\\label{tab:legal-placement}\n\\begin{tabular}{ll}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Type} & \\textbf{Legal Locations} \\\\\n\\midrule\nContainer \n& \\makecell[l]{fridge, stove, dishwasher, microwave,\\\\\ncabinet, bookshelf} \\\\\n\\addlinespace[2pt]\nSurface \n& \\makecell[l]{sofa, cabinet, bathroomcounter, nightstand,\\\\\nbench, bed, desk, tvstand, kitchencounter,\\\\ coffeetable, stove, kitchentable} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\paragraph{Validation and Goal Specification.} \nAfter placement, the VirtualHome environment is used to verify scene feasibility:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item The environment graph is updated to reflect the actual object positions.\n \\item Target object counts are checked to ensure that all task objects exist in the scene.\n \\item Predicates from the template are instantiated with the real node IDs in the scene.\n \\item Tasks failing these checks (e.g., insufficient instances or invalid placements) are discarded, and a new attempt is generated.\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\subsection{Benchmark Statistic}\n\\label{appendix:data}\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.8\\linewidth]{appendix/task_data/task_sunburst.png}\n \\caption{Three-layer sunburst chart illustrating the composition of eight household tasks used in our evaluation. The inner ring represents the eight task types; the middle ring shows the objects involved in each task; the outer ring indicates the object category.}\n \\label{fig:task-type-statistic}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{0pt}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{appendix/task_data/task_item_distribution.png}\n \\caption{Data distribution grouped by task type and number of subgoals.}\n \\label{fig:data-statistic}\n\\end{figure}\n\nMECoBench involves 25 common everyday objects, which are grouped into six categories: food and drinks, tableware, electronics, hygiene items, entertainment items, and office items. Figure~\\ref{fig:task-type-statistic} illustrates the correspondence between the eight task types and their associated object categories.\n\nFigure~\\ref{fig:data-statistic} shows the data distribution of MECoBench across different task types and task complexity levels, where task complexity is measured by the number of involved objects.\n\n\n\\section{Evaluation}\n\n\\subsection{Evaluation Setup}\n\\label{app:eval-setup}\nEach observation view is rendered at $256 \\times 256$ pixels, resulting in a four-view concatenated observation of $256 \\times 1024$. The four views are arranged in the order: front, back, left, and right. Both horizontal and vertical fields of view are set to $90^\\circ$. The agent model height is 1.8\\,m, and the camera is mounted at the same height with a forward offset of 0.15\\,m relative to the agent's position. The camera is pitched downward by $30^\\circ$ to capture more of the nearby surfaces and objects. Figure~\\ref{fig:view-exp} shows an example of the resulting concatenated observation.\n\n\\begin{table*}[!t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{10pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.05}\n\\caption{Full names of MLLMs used in our evaluation.}\n\\label{tab:model_versions}\n\\begin{tabular}{lll}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Model Name} & \\textbf{Creator} & \\textbf{Full Name / Identifier} \\\\\n\\midrule\nGPT-5-mini & OpenAI & \\texttt{gpt-5.4-mini} \\\\\nGPT-5.4 & OpenAI & \\texttt{gpt-5.4} \\\\\nGemini-3.1-Pro & Google & \\texttt{gemini-3.1-pro} \\\\\n\\midrule\nQwen3-8B-VL & Qwen & \\texttt{Qwen/Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct} \\\\\nQwen3-32B-VL & Qwen & \\texttt{Qwen/Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct} \\\\\nQwen3-235B-VL & Qwen & \\texttt{Qwen/Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Instruct} \\\\\nQwen3.5-9B & Qwen & \\texttt{Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B} \\\\\nQwen3.5-27B & Qwen & \\texttt{Qwen/Qwen3.5-27B} \\\\\n\\midrule\nGemma4-26B & Google & \\texttt{google/gemma-4-26b-it} \\\\\nGemma4-31B & Google & \\texttt{google/gemma-4-31b-it} \\\\\n\\midrule\nInternVL-3.5-38B & OpenGVLab & \\texttt{OpenGVLab/InternVL3\\_5-38B} \\\\\nInternVL-3.5-241B & OpenGVLab & \\texttt{OpenGVLab/InternVL3\\_5-241B-A28B} \\\\\n\\midrule\nLlama-4 Scout & Meta & \\texttt{meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct} \\\\\n\\midrule\nGLM-4.6V & Z.ai & \\texttt{zai-org/GLM-4.6V} \\\\\nGLM-4.6V-Flash & Z.ai & \\texttt{zai-org/GLM-4.6V-Flash} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{figure}[ht]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{appendix/eval/view-example.png}\n \\caption{Example observation image.}\n \\label{fig:view-exp}\n\\end{figure}\n\nFor all evaluated models, we adopt the recommended generation configurations whenever available. For closed-source models, we use the official APIs with their default generation settings. For open-source models, we follow the generation configurations specified in the corresponding model cards or vLLM~\\cite{kwon2023efficient} documentation to ensure strong and reliable performance.\n\n\\subsection{Model Versions}\n\\label{app:model}\nTable~\\ref{tab:model_versions} summarizes the model versions and full identifiers used in our experiments. Proprietary models are accessed through their official APIs, while open-source models are locally deployed using vLLM~\\cite{kwon2023efficient}.\n\n\\subsection{Action Space}\n\\label{app:action}\n\\begin{table*}[ht]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Action space for agents in MECoBench. Parallel tasks include basic navigation and object manipulation actions. Sequential tasks introduce cross-room handover actions.}\n\\label{tab:action-space}\n\\begin{tabular}{lll}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Action} & \\textbf{Description} & \\textbf{Parameters} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\textit{Parallel Task Actions}} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\texttt{walk} & Move towards a visible object, furniture, or door & object \\\\\n\\texttt{walk\\_to\\_room} & Move directly to another room & bedroom / livingroom / kitchen / bathroom \\\\\n\\texttt{grab} & Pick up a visible and grabbable object & object \\\\\n\\texttt{open} & Open a container & container \\\\\n\\texttt{put\\_on} & Place the held object on a visible surface & object (holding), surface \\\\\n\\texttt{put\\_in} & Place the held object inside a visible container & object (holding), container \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\textit{Sequential Task Additional Actions}} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\texttt{walk\\_to\\_door} & Move to a specific door in the environment topology & door\\_id \\\\\n\\texttt{handover} & Give a held object to another agent when close (<2m) & object(holding), recipient agent name \\\\\n\\texttt{receive} & Wait to receive an object & none \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table*}\n\nTable~\\ref{tab:action-space} lists the action space for agents when evaluation for both parallel and sequential tasks. Parallel tasks include basic navigation and object manipulation actions, while sequential tasks introduce cross-room handover actions.\n\n\\paragraph{Single-Agent Action Legality}\nEach agent action must satisfy the following legality constraints:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item \\textbf{Hand occupancy:} Each agent can hold at most two objects. When both hands are occupied, the agent cannot execute \\texttt{grab} or \\texttt{open}. For \\texttt{put\\_*} and \\texttt{handover}, the object to be placed or handed over must already be held by the acting agent.\n \n \\item \\textbf{Visibility:} The target objects of \\texttt{walk}, \\texttt{grab}, and \\texttt{put\\_*} actions must be visible in the agent's current observation.\n \n \\item \\textbf{Container state:} An agent cannot execute \\texttt{open} on a container that is already open.\n \n \\item \\textbf{Room accessibility:} For \\texttt{walk\\_*}, \\texttt{grab}, and \\texttt{put\\_*} actions, the target must be located in one of the rooms accessible to the agent.\n \n \\item \\textbf{Invalid actions:} Any action name not listed in Table~\\ref{tab:action-space} is considered invalid.\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\paragraph{Multi-Agent Interaction Constraints}\nWhen multiple agents act simultaneously, additional interaction constraints are applied:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item \\textbf{Conflict resolution:} The conflict set includes \\texttt{grab} and \\texttt{open}. If multiple agents attempt the same conflict action on the same object at the same time, one agent is randomly selected as the \\emph{winner}, while the others remain idle.\n \n \\item \\textbf{Handover distance:} A \\texttt{handover} action is valid only when the giver and receiver are within 2 meters of each other.\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\subsection{Action Decoding and Grounding}\n\\label{sec:action_decoding}\n\\begin{figure}[ht]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\linewidth]{appendix/eval/action.pdf}\n \\caption{Example of action decoding and grounding.}\n \\label{fig:action_decode_example}\n\\end{figure}\nAgents output semantic actions based on their observation rather than executable simulator commands. \nThus, each generated action is decoded and grounded before execution. \nActions that do not require object grounding, such as \\texttt{receive}, \\texttt{walk\\_to\\_room/door}, and \\texttt{handover}, are resolved by rule-based mappings. \nFor object-centric actions, including \\texttt{walk}, \\texttt{grab}, \\texttt{open}, \\texttt{put\\_on}, and \\texttt{put\\_in}, semantic object descriptions are grounded to concrete simulator object identifiers.\n\nAs shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:action_decode_example}, the top panels present the agent's first-person observation and generated semantic action. \nThe decoder then uses visible object candidates, their bounding boxes, and metadata, together with both the original and bbox-annotated views, to select the target simulator ID and produce the final executable action.\n\n\\section{Core Prompt Templates}\n\\label{app:core-prompts}\nThis section presents the core prompt templates designed for agents in the MECoBench evaluation platform.\n\n\\subsection{Communicate Phase}\nBelow we list prompts for broadcast, discuss and leader-based communication protocol (Figure~\\ref{fig:prompt-base},~\\ref{fig:prompt-discussion},~\\ref{fig:prompt-worker},~\\ref{fig:prompt-leader},~\\ref{fig:prompt-input-comm}).\n\\begin{figure}[!ht]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{appendix/prompt/broadcast.pdf}\n \\caption{Broadcast protocol communication prompt. This module asks each agent to decide\n whether to send a concise, useful message before physical action planning.}\n \\label{fig:prompt-base}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{appendix/prompt/discuss.pdf}\n \\caption{Discussion protocol prompt. The first round prompt is highlighted in blue, and the follow-up rounds prompt is highlighted in orange.}\n \\label{fig:prompt-discussion}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{appendix/prompt/worker.pdf}\n \\caption{Centralized mode: worker report prompt.}\n \\label{fig:prompt-worker}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{appendix/prompt/leader.pdf}\n \\caption{Centralized mode: leader assignment prompt. Text-only communication is highlighted in blue, and the vision-augmented is highlighted in orange.}\n \\label{fig:prompt-leader}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{appendix/prompt/input.pdf}\n \\caption{Input block for communicate phase.}\n \\label{fig:prompt-input-comm}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Act Phase}\nThis section presents the prompts used for action decision-making, memory update and action decoding (Figure~\\ref{fig:prompt-action-memory},~\\ref{fig:prompt-action-decode},~\\ref{fig:prompt-action-rule},~\\ref{fig:prompt-input-act},~\\ref{fig:prompt-memory-rule},~\\ref{fig:prompt-shared-memory-rule}).\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{appendix/prompt/act.pdf}\n \\caption{Action and memory update prompt. Normal memory is highlighted in blue and shared memory is highlighted in orange.}\n \\label{fig:prompt-action-memory}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{appendix/prompt/action-decode.pdf}\n \\caption{Prompt for action decoder.}\n \\label{fig:prompt-action-decode}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{appendix/prompt/act-rule.pdf}\n \\caption{Action rules block.}\n \\label{fig:prompt-action-rule}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{appendix/prompt/input-act.pdf}\n \\caption{Input block for the act phase. For sequential tasks, the two additional parts are highlighted in blue.}\n \\label{fig:prompt-input-act}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{appendix/prompt/memory.pdf}\n \\caption{Memory update rules block.}\n \\label{fig:prompt-memory-rule}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!h]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{appendix/prompt/shared-memory.pdf}\n \\caption{Shared memory update rules block.}\n \\label{fig:prompt-shared-memory-rule}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\section{Experiment Results}\nIn this section, we provide detailed results for the experiments in Sections~\\ref{sec:exp-1},~\\ref{sec:exp-2}, and~\\ref{sec:exp-3}, as well as some additional experimental results.\n\\subsection{Performance of Different Models in Parallel and Sequential Tasks}\n\\label{app:main_results}\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\newcommand{\\graycell}[1]{\\cellcolor{gray!10}#1}\n\\caption{Performance comparison under parallel and sequential normal settings. Avg. SR and Avg. CR denote the average SR and CR across parallel and sequential tasks under the 2-agent setup. Best results are shown in bold, and second-best results are underlined, respectively for 2-agent and 1-agent setup.}\n\\label{tab:main-1}\n\\begin{tabular}{lc ccc ccc cc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Model} & \\textbf{\\#Agents}\n& \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\cellcolor{blue!10}\\textbf{Parallel Task}}\n& \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\cellcolor{orange!15}\\textbf{Sequential Task}}\n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{Avg.}} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){3-5} \\cmidrule(lr){6-8} \\cmidrule(lr){9-10}\n& & \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} & \\textbf{AUC}\n& \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} & \\textbf{AUC}\n& \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{10}{c}{\\textit{Closed-source MLLMs}} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{GPT-5-mini}\n& 1 & \\textbf{0.906} & \\textbf{0.974} & \\textbf{0.793} & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n& \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{\\underline{0.917}} & \\graycell{\\underline{0.982}} & \\graycell{\\textbf{0.776}} & \\graycell{0.719} & \\graycell{0.901} & \\graycell{\\underline{0.624}} & \\graycell{0.818} & \\graycell{\\textbf{0.942}} \\\\\n\\multirow{2}{*}{GPT-5.4}\n& 1 & \\underline{0.854} & \\underline{0.960} & \\underline{0.788} & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n& \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{0.896} & \\graycell{0.969} & \\graycell{0.731} & \\graycell{\\underline{0.771}} & \\graycell{\\textbf{0.914}} & \\graycell{\\textbf{0.655}} & \\graycell{\\textbf{0.834}} & \\graycell{\\textbf{0.942}} \\\\\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Gemini-3.1-Pro}\n& 1 & 0.802 & 0.927 & 0.645 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n& \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{0.771} & \\graycell{0.937} & \\graycell{0.606} & \\graycell{0.573} & \\graycell{0.824} & \\graycell{0.472} & \\graycell{0.672} & \\graycell{0.881} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{10}{c}{\\textit{Open-source MLLMs}} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Qwen3-8B-VL}\n& 1 & 0.354 & 0.620 & 0.419 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n& \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{0.458} & \\graycell{0.770} & \\graycell{0.535} & \\graycell{0.073} & \\graycell{0.332} & \\graycell{0.208} & \\graycell{0.266} & \\graycell{0.551} \\\\\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Qwen3-32B-VL}\n& 1 & 0.583 & 0.753 & 0.542 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n& \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{0.802} & \\graycell{0.934} & \\graycell{0.694} & \\graycell{0.365} & \\graycell{0.620} & \\graycell{0.393} & \\graycell{0.584} & \\graycell{0.777} \\\\\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Qwen3-235B-VL}\n& 1 & 0.656 & 0.855 & 0.648 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n& \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{0.667} & \\graycell{0.896} & \\graycell{0.649} & \\graycell{0.354} & \\graycell{0.675} & \\graycell{0.451} & \\graycell{0.511} & \\graycell{0.786} \\\\\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Qwen3.5-9B}\n& 1 & \\underline{0.854} & 0.924 & 0.721 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n& \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{\\textbf{0.938}} & \\graycell{\\textbf{0.985}} & \\graycell{\\underline{0.764}} & \\graycell{0.615} & \\graycell{0.844} & \\graycell{0.558} & \\graycell{0.777} & \\graycell{0.915} \\\\\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Qwen3.5-27B}\n& 1 & 0.844 & 0.950 & 0.760 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n& \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{\\textbf{0.938}} & \\graycell{0.969} & \\graycell{0.726} & \\graycell{0.698} & \\graycell{0.872} & \\graycell{0.587} & \\graycell{0.818} & \\graycell{0.921} \\\\\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Gemma4-26B}\n& 1 & 0.760 & 0.867 & 0.636 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n& \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{0.812} & \\graycell{0.944} & \\graycell{0.644} & \\graycell{0.688} & \\graycell{0.839} & \\graycell{0.556} & \\graycell{0.750} & \\graycell{0.892} \\\\\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Gemma4-31B}\n& 1 & 0.833 & 0.921 & 0.703 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n& \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{0.833} & \\graycell{0.945} & \\graycell{0.688} & \\graycell{\\textbf{0.823}} & \\graycell{\\underline{0.904}} & \\graycell{0.620} & \\graycell{\\underline{0.828}} & \\graycell{\\underline{0.925}} \\\\\n\\multirow{2}{*}{InternVL-3.5-38B}\n& 1 & 0.677 & 0.875 & 0.659 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n& \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{0.594} & \\graycell{0.830} & \\graycell{0.553} & \\graycell{0.135} & \\graycell{0.429} & \\graycell{0.280} & \\graycell{0.365} & \\graycell{0.630} \\\\\n\\multirow{2}{*}{InternVL-3.5-241B}\n& 1 & 0.833 & 0.946 & 0.728 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n& \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{0.719} & \\graycell{0.914} & \\graycell{0.594} & \\graycell{0.031} & \\graycell{0.267} & \\graycell{0.180} & \\graycell{0.375} & \\graycell{0.591} \\\\\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Llama-4}\n& 1 & 0.250 & 0.467 & 0.345 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n& \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{0.250} & \\graycell{0.543} & \\graycell{0.380} & \\graycell{0.042} & \\graycell{0.225} & \\graycell{0.163} & \\graycell{0.146} & \\graycell{0.384} \\\\\n\\multirow{2}{*}{GLM-4.6V}\n& 1 & 0.594 & 0.825 & 0.501 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n& \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{0.719} & \\graycell{0.895} & \\graycell{0.600} & \\graycell{0.010} & \\graycell{0.283} & \\graycell{0.188} & \\graycell{0.365} & \\graycell{0.589} \\\\\n\\multirow{2}{*}{GLM-4.6V-Flash}\n& 1 & 0.094 & 0.351 & 0.271 & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n& \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{0.125} & \\graycell{0.456} & \\graycell{0.316} & \\graycell{0.000} & \\graycell{0.090} & \\graycell{0.060} & \\graycell{0.063} & \\graycell{0.273} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table*}\n\nTable~\\ref{tab:main-1} shows the detailed result of figure~\\ref{fig:1-1-overall} and \\ref{fig:1-1-gain}. Overall, GPT-5.4 achieves the best performance. GPT-5-mini and Gemma4-31B are the second-tier models, showing consistently strong results across the two collaboration structures. In addition, Qwen3.5, Gemma4-26B, and Gemini-3.1-Pro also exhibit relatively strong performance. Qwen3-VL-32B and Qwen3-VL-235B fall into the middle-performance group, with relatively balanced results across parallel and sequential tasks. Qwen3-VL-8B is a relatively weak model, but its performance remains comparatively balanced between the two coordination structures. In contrast, InternVL-3.5 and GLM-4.6V struggle particularly on sequential tasks, where precise collaboration is required. Finally, Llama-4-Scout and GLM-4.6V-Flash perform poorly under both collaboration structures.\n\n\\paragraph{Model scaling effects.} Overall, except for InternVL-3.5, larger models generally perform better within the same family. However, scaling tends to amplify existing task-specific patterns rather than change them. Some families remain balanced across parallel and sequential tasks, while others are consistently stronger in single-agent or parallel settings, or particularly weak on sequential tasks requiring precise coordination. For example, Gemma4 benefits from scaling especially on sequential tasks, whereas InternVL-3.5 achieves stronger single-agent parallel performance at larger scale but degrades in sequential collaboration. This suggests that stronger individual capability does not necessarily translate into better communication and coordination.\n\nBased on model performance and cost-effectiveness, we select Qwen3-VL-32B and Qwen3-VL-8B as two representative models for studying team-size scaling and related factors in subsequent experiments. For strong models, we conduct most experiments with GPT-5-mini and Gemma4-31B, and include GPT-5.4 when necessary.\n\n\\begin{table}[htbp]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Results on Parallel tasks for Qwen3-VL models with one to five agents. Comparison of performance with (broadcast) and without communication. The best results of both models are shown in bold.}\n\\label{tab:qwen3_parallel_normal_agents}\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n\\begin{tabular}{c ccc ccc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{\\#Ag.}\n& \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\cellcolor{blue!10}\\textbf{With comm.}}\n& \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\cellcolor{orange!15}\\textbf{Without Comm.}} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){2-4} \\cmidrule(lr){5-7}\n& \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} & \\textbf{AUC}\n& \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} & \\textbf{AUC} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{7}{c}{\\textit{Qwen3-VL-8B}} \\\\\n\\midrule\n1 & 0.354 & 0.620 & 0.419 & 0.354 & 0.620 & \\textbf{0.419} \\\\\n2 & 0.458 & 0.770 & 0.535 & 0.271 & 0.546 & 0.339 \\\\\n3 & \\textbf{0.521} & \\textbf{0.837} & \\textbf{0.558} & \\textbf{0.396} & \\textbf{0.655} & 0.411 \\\\\n4 & 0.469 & 0.794 & 0.501 & 0.323 & 0.642 & 0.409 \\\\\n5 & 0.458 & 0.794 & 0.468 & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{7}{c}{\\textit{Qwen3-VL-32B}} \\\\\n\\midrule\n1 & 0.583 & 0.753 & 0.542 & \\textbf{0.583} & 0.753 & 0.542 \\\\\n2 & 0.802 & 0.934 & \\textbf{0.694} & \\textbf{0.583} & \\textbf{0.802} & \\textbf{0.567} \\\\\n3 & 0.833 & 0.943 & 0.656 & 0.500 & 0.705 & 0.481 \\\\\n4 & \\textbf{0.844} & \\textbf{0.954} & 0.658 & 0.469 & 0.720 & 0.468 \\\\\n5 & 0.740 & 0.892 & 0.567 & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table*}[!t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Success rate and completion rate by number of objects for Qwen3-VL models on Parallel tasks. Best results for each model are shown in bold, and second-best results are underlined.}\n\\label{tab:qwen_obj_vs_agents}\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3pt}\n\\begin{tabular}{l c cc cc cc cc cc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Model} & \\textbf{\\#Objects}\n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{1 Agent}}\n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{2 Agents}}\n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{3 Agents}}\n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{4 Agents}}\n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{5 Agents}} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){3-4} \\cmidrule(lr){5-6} \\cmidrule(lr){7-8} \\cmidrule(lr){9-10} \\cmidrule(lr){11-12}\n& & \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR}\n& \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR}\n& \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR}\n& \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR}\n& \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{6}{*}{Qwen3-32B-VL}\n& 2 & 0.875 & 0.938 & 0.875 & 0.938 & \\underline{0.938} & \\underline{0.969} & \\underline{0.938} & \\underline{0.969} & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} \\\\\n& 3 & 0.765 & 0.863 & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} & \\underline{0.941} & \\underline{0.980} & 0.875 & 0.938 \\\\\n& 4 & 0.625 & 0.812 & \\underline{0.938} & \\underline{0.984} & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} & 0.750 & 0.922 \\\\\n& 5 & 0.438 & 0.650 & 0.688 & 0.838 & 0.688 & 0.888 & \\textbf{0.812} & \\textbf{0.938} & \\underline{0.800} & \\underline{0.867} \\\\\n& 6 & 0.389 & 0.630 & \\underline{0.667} & \\underline{0.935} & \\textbf{0.778} & \\textbf{0.944} & \\underline{0.667} & \\underline{0.935} & 0.500 & 0.880 \\\\\n& 7 & 0.385 & 0.604 & 0.615 & 0.901 & 0.583 & 0.905 & \\textbf{0.750} & \\textbf{0.964} & \\underline{0.667} & \\underline{0.917} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{6}{*}{Qwen3-8B-VL}\n& 2 & 0.750 & 0.875 & \\underline{0.875} & \\underline{0.938} & \\textbf{0.938} & \\textbf{0.969} & 0.812 & 0.906 & \\underline{0.875} & \\underline{0.938} \\\\\n& 3 & 0.588 & 0.784 & \\underline{0.824} & \\underline{0.922} & \\textbf{0.882} & \\textbf{0.941} & \\underline{0.824} & \\underline{0.922} & 0.706 & 0.863 \\\\\n& 4 & 0.312 & 0.562 & \\textbf{0.500} & \\textbf{0.828} & \\textbf{0.500} & \\textbf{0.828} & \\textbf{0.500} & \\textbf{0.828} & \\underline{0.438} & \\underline{0.766} \\\\\n& 5 & 0.250 & 0.562 & 0.375 & 0.713 & \\underline{0.438} & \\underline{0.800} & 0.333 & 0.747 & \\textbf{0.500} & \\textbf{0.787} \\\\\n& 6 & 0.111 & 0.444 & 0.056 & 0.685 & \\underline{0.167} & \\underline{0.713} & \\textbf{0.278} & \\textbf{0.741} & 0.111 & 0.704 \\\\\n& 7 & \\underline{0.077} & \\underline{0.472} & \\underline{0.077} & \\underline{0.483} & \\textbf{0.154} & \\textbf{0.769} & 0.000 & 0.637 & \\underline{0.077} & \\underline{0.692} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{table*}[!t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\newcommand{\\graycell}[1]{\\cellcolor{gray!10}#1}\n\\caption{Results for 2-agent broadcast and no-communication protocols on Parallel and Sequential tasks. NA indicates that no handover attempt was made.}\n\\label{tab:coord_base_nocomm_parallel_seq}\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3pt}\n\\begin{tabular}{ll cccc cccc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Model} & \\textbf{Mode}\n& \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\cellcolor{blue!10}\\textbf{Parallel Task}}\n& \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\cellcolor{orange!15}\\textbf{Sequential Task}} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){3-6} \\cmidrule(lr){7-10}\n& & \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} & \\textbf{AUC} & \\textbf{CAR}\n& \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} & \\textbf{AUC} & \\textbf{HFR} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Gemma4-31B}\n& Broadcast & 0.833 & 0.945 & 0.689 & 0.019 & 0.823 & 0.904 & 0.620 & 0.322 \\\\\n& \\graycell{No Comm} & \\graycell{0.719} & \\graycell{0.863} & \\graycell{0.558} & \\graycell{0.023} & \\graycell{0.177} & \\graycell{0.464} & \\graycell{0.308} & \\graycell{0.486} \\\\\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Qwen3-32B-VL}\n& Broadcast & 0.802 & 0.934 & 0.694 & 0.020 & 0.365 & 0.620 & 0.393 & 0.294 \\\\\n& \\graycell{No Comm} & \\graycell{0.583} & \\graycell{0.802} & \\graycell{0.567} & \\graycell{0.028} & \\graycell{0.073} & \\graycell{0.325} & \\graycell{0.232} & \\graycell{0.733} \\\\\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Qwen3.5-9B}\n& Broadcast & 0.938 & 0.985 & 0.764 & 0.008 & 0.615 & 0.844 & 0.558 & 0.400 \\\\\n& \\graycell{No Comm} & \\graycell{0.865} & \\graycell{0.939} & \\graycell{0.680} & \\graycell{0.036} & \\graycell{0.062} & \\graycell{0.325} & \\graycell{0.231} & \\graycell{0.903} \\\\\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Qwen3-8B-VL}\n& Broadcast & 0.458 & 0.770 & 0.535 & 0.010 & 0.073 & 0.332 & 0.208 & 0.662 \\\\\n& \\graycell{No Comm} & \\graycell{0.274} & \\graycell{0.552} & \\graycell{0.342} & \\graycell{0.017} & \\graycell{0.042} & \\graycell{0.182} & \\graycell{0.132} & \\graycell{NA} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\vspace{-12pt}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{appendix/exp/agent_num_curves_qwen32b.pdf}\n \\caption{Task progress over steps for 1 to 5 agents under the broadcast protocol on the parallel task. Results are obtained with Qwen3-VL-32B.}\n \\label{fig:agent-num-curve}\n \\vspace{-12pt}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\paragraph{Team size scaling effects.} Table~\\ref{tab:qwen3_parallel_normal_agents} shows the detailed result for Figure~\\ref{fig:agent-number-complexity} (a) and \\ref{fig:role_of_communication}(b). The results show that: (1) Simply increasing the number of agents does not necessarily improve performance. Without communication, adding more agents can even introduce disorder and redundant actions, leading to lower efficiency and worse task completion. However, when agents are allowed to communicate, multi-agent collaboration becomes more effective in coordinating actions and completing tasks.\n(2) More agents are not always better. Qwen3-VL-32B benefits from additional agents up to four agents, while Qwen3-VL-8B reaches its best performance with three agents and drops afterward. This suggests that weaker models are more affected by coordination overhead. \n(3) Collaboration can partially compensate for limited individual model capability, but cannot fully remove the capability gap. With communication, three Qwen3-VL-8B agents approach the single-agent performance of Qwen3-VL-32B, but the final performance remains constrained by the underlying model capability. Table~\\ref{tab:qwen_obj_vs_agents} shows the detailed results in figure~\\ref{fig:agent-number-complexity}(b). This indicate that multi-agent collaboration is especially helpful for more complex tasks with more target objects. For 7-object tasks, the SR nearly doubles for both models: from 0.385 to 0.750 for Qwen3-VL-32B, and from 0.077 to 0.154 for Qwen3-VL-8B. A task progress comprison of different team size shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:agent-num-curve}.\n\n\\subsection{Role of communication}\n\\label{app:comm-role}\nTable~\\ref{tab:coord_base_nocomm_parallel_seq} shows the detailed results in figure~\\ref{fig:role_of_communication}(a) when ablating communication from collaboration. Removing communication degrades both task performance and collaboration quality. In parallel tasks with a shared workspace, it generally increases CAR, indicating more conflicts actions between agents. In sequential tasks, the impact is more severe, as agents fail to coordinate cross-region handovers, causing HFR to rise substantially.\n\n\\subsection{Comparison of Different Collaboration Modes}\n\\label{app:collab-mode}\n\n\\begin{table*}[ht]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Results of different communication protocol under parallel and sequential tasks across models. \\textit{Spatial Err} denotes the frequency of spatial errors, where an agent attempts to move to a location outside its assigned region. Best results within each model are shown in bold, and cross-model best results are highlighted in yellow.}\n\\label{tab:mode_radar_data}\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3pt}\n\\begin{tabular}{ll cccccc cccccc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Model} & \\textbf{Mode}\n& \\multicolumn{6}{c}{\\cellcolor{blue!10}\\textbf{Parallel}}\n& \\multicolumn{6}{c}{\\cellcolor{orange!15}\\textbf{Sequential}} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){3-8} \\cmidrule(lr){9-14}\n& & \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} & \\textbf{AUC} & \\textbf{DOL} & \\textbf{Tokens} & \\textbf{CAR}\n& \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} & \\textbf{AUC} & \\textbf{Spatial Err} & \\textbf{Tokens} & \\textbf{HFR} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{14}{c}{\\textit{\\textbf{Closed-source MLLMs}}} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{3}{*}{GPT-5.4}\n& Broadcast & \\cellcolor{yellow!25}\\textbf{0.900} & \\textbf{0.961} & 0.700 & 0.773 & \\textbf{4331.9} & 0.015 & \\textbf{0.767} & 0.904 & 0.640 & \\textbf{0.017} & \\textbf{7328.1} & 0.228 \\\\\n& Discuss & 0.767 & 0.932 & 0.730 & 0.717 & 6266.6 & \\cellcolor{yellow!25}\\textbf{0.001} & \\textbf{0.767} & \\textbf{0.911} & \\cellcolor{yellow!25}\\textbf{0.652} & 0.021 & 7619.3 &\\textbf{0.177} \\\\\n& Leader & 0.784 & 0.934 & \\cellcolor{yellow!25}\\textbf{0.752} & \\cellcolor{yellow!25}\\textbf{0.883} & 6558.6 & 0.009 & \\textbf{0.767} & 0.870 & 0.639 & 0.023 & 8085.5 & 0.223 \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{14}{c}{\\textit{\\textbf{Open-source MLLMs}}} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{4}{*}{Gemma4-31B}\n& Broadcast & 0.833 & 0.945 & 0.689 & 0.794 & 5381.8 & 0.019 & 0.823 & 0.904 & 0.620 & 0.038 & 8042.4 & 0.322 \\\\\n& Discuss & 0.802 & 0.855 & 0.638 & 0.731 & 6852.5 & \\cellcolor{yellow!25}\\textbf{0.001} & 0.812 & 0.922 & 0.625 & 0.025 & 8978.3 & 0.224 \\\\\n& Leader & \\textbf{0.865} & \\cellcolor{yellow!25}\\textbf{0.964} & \\textbf{0.736} & \\textbf{0.840} & 6863.0 & 0.003 & \\cellcolor{yellow!25}\\textbf{0.854} & \\cellcolor{yellow!25}\\textbf{0.963} & \\cellcolor{yellow!25}\\textbf{0.652} & \\cellcolor{yellow!25}\\textbf{0.016} & 8723.5 & \\cellcolor{yellow!25}\\textbf{0.138} \\\\\n& No Comm & 0.719 & 0.863 & 0.558 & 0.706 & \\textbf{3577.4} & 0.023 & 0.177 & 0.464 & 0.308 & 0.297 & \\textbf{4539.7} & 0.486 \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{4}{*}{Qwen3-32B-VL}\n& Broadcast & 0.802 & 0.934 & 0.694 & 0.802 & 4682.0 & 0.020 & 0.365 & 0.620 & 0.393 & 0.166 & 6749.4 & \\textbf{0.294} \\\\\n& Discuss & 0.808 & 0.929 & 0.694 & 0.818 & 6351.7 & \\textbf{0.003} & 0.333 & 0.583 & 0.374 & 0.100 & 8324.3 & 0.304 \\\\\n& Leader & \\textbf{0.833} & \\textbf{0.938} & \\textbf{0.706} & \\textbf{0.855} & 5964.7 & 0.012 & \\textbf{0.396} & \\textbf{0.622} & \\textbf{0.408} & \\textbf{0.046} & 7516.5 & 0.378 \\\\\n& No Comm & 0.583 & 0.802 & 0.567 & 0.629 & \\cellcolor{yellow!25}\\textbf{3017.7} & 0.028 & 0.073 & 0.325 & 0.232 & 0.451 & \\textbf{3559.0} & 0.733 \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{4}{*}{Qwen3-8B-VL}\n& Broadcast & 0.458 & 0.770 & 0.535 & 0.676 & 4585.4 & 0.010 & \\textbf{0.073} & \\textbf{0.332} & 0.207 & 0.312 & 6788.2 & 0.662 \\\\\n& Discuss & 0.458 & 0.783 & 0.494 & \\textbf{0.702} & 7206.1 & 0.011 & 0.021 & 0.283 & 0.195 & 0.319 & 8934.5 & \\textbf{0.601} \\\\\n& Leader & \\textbf{0.490} & \\textbf{0.785} & \\textbf{0.548} & 0.642 & 5701.5 & \\textbf{0.005} & 0.052 & \\textbf{0.332} & \\textbf{0.227} & \\textbf{0.223} & 7161.4 & 0.658 \\\\\n& No Comm & 0.274 & 0.552 & 0.342 & 0.357 & \\textbf{3310.1} & 0.017 & 0.042 & 0.182 & 0.132 & 0.613 & \\cellcolor{yellow!25}\\textbf{3475.1} & NA \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.64\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{appendix/exp/shared_memory_gain.pdf}\n \\caption{Comparison of explicit broadcast and implicit shared memory protocol. The models are from the Qwen3-VL family.}\n \\label{fig:d4}\n \\end{minipage}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.34\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{appendix/exp/model_scale.pdf}\n \\caption{Effect of leader capability in centralized collaboration. The models are from the Qwen3-VL family.}\n \\label{fig:strong-leader}\n \\end{minipage}\n \\vspace{-12pt}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.95\\linewidth]{appendix/exp/comm_modes_gemma4-31b.pdf}\n \\caption{Task progress over equivalent steps under different communication protocols on parallel tasks.\nResults are obtained with Gemma4-31B.\nLeader-MM denotes the vision-augmented leadership protocol.}\n \\label{fig:comm-curve}\n \\vspace{-12pt}\n\\end{figure}\n\nTable~\\ref{tab:mode_radar_data} gives the detailed results of Figure~\\ref{fig:comm-mode-analysis}(a). The results show that centralized collaboration generally improves division of labor and task efficiency, reflected by higher DOL and AUC. In contrast, the discuss protocol is more effective at reducing conflicts, leading to lower CAR. For weaker models, centralized collaboration also helps reduce spatial cognition errors in sequential tasks, suggesting that leader-based coordination can provide useful guidance when agents have limited planning or spatial reasoning ability. Figure~\\ref{fig:comm-curve} shows the comparison of task progress under single agent and different communication protocol in two-agent team.\n\n\\paragraph{Shared Memory.} Figure~\\ref{fig:d4} reports the absolute values of success rate, AUC, and token consumption for broadcast and shared memory, providing a more detailed version of Figure~\\ref{fig:3-1-shared-memory}.\n\n\\begin{table*}[!t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Results under different prior-information settings on parallel tasks. Full prior includes both object appearance and location information. Without appearance removes object appearance description, without location removes prior location information, and no prior removes both.}\n\\label{tab:parallel_prior_ablation}\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3pt}\n\\begin{tabular}{l ccc ccc ccc ccc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Model}\n& \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\cellcolor{blue!10}\\textbf{Full Prior}}\n& \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\cellcolor{orange!15}\\textbf{Without Appearance}}\n& \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\cellcolor{green!10}\\textbf{Without Location}}\n& \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\cellcolor{gray!15}\\textbf{No Prior}} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){2-4} \\cmidrule(lr){5-7} \\cmidrule(lr){8-10} \\cmidrule(lr){11-13}\n& \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} & \\textbf{AUC}\n& \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} & \\textbf{AUC}\n& \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} & \\textbf{AUC}\n& \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} & \\textbf{AUC} \\\\\n\\midrule\nGPT-5-mini\n& 0.917 & 0.982 & 0.776\n& 0.865 & 0.955 & 0.730\n& 0.344 & 0.691 & 0.436\n& 0.271 & 0.609 & 0.431 \\\\\nGemma4-31B\n& 0.833 & 0.945 & 0.688\n& 0.833 & 0.937 & 0.662\n& 0.229 & 0.589 & 0.347\n& 0.302 & 0.570 & 0.356 \\\\\nQwen3-32B-VL\n& 0.802 & 0.934 & 0.694\n& 0.802 & 0.923 & 0.655\n& 0.260 & 0.591 & 0.365\n& 0.344 & 0.688 & 0.456 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Results on parallel tasks without location information. Each cell reports SR/CR/AUC. Qwen-* is short for Qwen3-VL, Inter-* is short for InterVL3.5.}\n\\label{tab:parallel_no_location}\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3pt}\n\\begin{tabular}{l cc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Model}\n& \\cellcolor{blue!10}\\textbf{1-Agent}\n& \\cellcolor{orange!15}\\textbf{2-Agent} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\textit{Closed-source MLLMs}} \\\\\n\\midrule\nGPT-5-mini \n& \\textbf{0.323 / 0.630 / 0.436}\n& \\textbf{0.344 / 0.691 / 0.436} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\textit{Open-source MLLMs}} \\\\\n\\midrule\nQwen-8B \n& 0.031 / 0.162 / 0.103\n& 0.021 / 0.199 / 0.101 \\\\\nQwen-32B \n& 0.219 / 0.520 / 0.344\n& 0.260 / 0.591 / 0.365 \\\\\nQwen-235B \n& 0.115 / 0.389 / 0.264\n& 0.271 / 0.581 / 0.332 \\\\\nQwen3.5-9B \n& \\underline{0.292 / 0.582 / 0.389}\n& \\underline{0.292 / 0.649 / 0.435} \\\\\nGemma-31B \n& 0.240 / 0.561 / 0.358\n& 0.229 / 0.589 / 0.347 \\\\\nIntern-38B \n& 0.010 / 0.146 / 0.087\n& 0.073 / 0.253 / 0.144 \\\\\nIntern-241B \n& 0.021 / 0.201 / 0.113\n& 0.062 / 0.217 / 0.114 \\\\\nLlama-4 \n& 0.021 / 0.089 / 0.058\n& 0.000 / 0.107 / 0.056 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\subsection{Mix Team: Strong Model as Leader.}\n\\label{app:mix-team}\nWe further investigate the role of leader in centralized mode. As shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:strong-leader}, using a stronger leader improves the mixed team, but does not make it approach the all-strong setting. The mixed team nearly matches the all-strong team in CR, but its SR is only slightly above the average of the all-weak and all-strong teams, and its AUC is even below this average. This indicates that a strong leader mainly improves task coverage, but efficient and overall success still depends heavily on the worker's capability.\n\n\\subsection{Performance Under Imperfect Information.}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!t]\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{0pt}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{exp_fig/no_loc/num-agent-no-loc.pdf}\n \\caption{Team size scaling effect without location prior. (a) SR and CR change as the number of agents increases. (b) SR versus the number of target objects, with fitted trend lines for different team sizes.}\n \\label{fig:app-noloc-analysis}\n \\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\paragraph{Missing location priors} Table~\\ref{tab:parallel_no_location} reports detailed results under the no-prior-location setting on parallel tasks across different models. Figure~\\ref{fig:app-noloc-analysis} shows the team size scaling effect under stronger exploration demands, where prior location information is removed. Compared with the full-information setting, Qwen3-32B-VL exhibits a similar but weaker inverted-U-shaped trend, suggesting that moderate team scaling remains helpful. For Qwen3-8B-VL, SR remains low across team sizes, indicating a capability bottleneck. Moreover, when grouping cases by object count, larger teams still show a milder performance drop.\nMore detailed results in Table~\\ref{tab:qwen3_parallel_no_location_agents}.\n\n\\begin{table}[!h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Results on Parallel tasks without location prior for Qwen3-VL models with one to four agents, under the broadcast protocol. The best results of each model is highlighted in bold.}\n\\label{tab:qwen3_parallel_no_location_agents}\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n\\begin{tabular}{lcccc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Model} & \\textbf{\\#Agents} & \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} & \\textbf{AUC} \\\\\n\\midrule\nQwen3-8B-VL & 1 & 0.031 & 0.162 & 0.103 \\\\\n & 2 & 0.021 & 0.199 & 0.101 \\\\\n & 3 & \\textbf{0.094} & 0.298 & \\textbf{0.168} \\\\\n & 4 & 0.062 & \\textbf{0.307} & 0.163 \\\\\n\\midrule\nQwen3-32B-VL & 1 & 0.219 & 0.520 & 0.344 \\\\\n & 2 & 0.260 & 0.591 & 0.365 \\\\\n & 3 & \\textbf{0.292} & \\textbf{0.657} & \\textbf{0.404} \\\\\n & 4 & 0.219 & 0.608 & 0.374 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.8\\linewidth]{appendix/exp/prior_cr.pdf}\n \\caption{Completion rate under different prior-information settings on parallel tasks.}\n \\label{fig:info_cr}\n \\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\linewidth]{appendix/exp/combined.pdf}\n \\caption{Performance by number of objects across task conditions and model groups.}\n \\label{fig:all-task-obj}\n \\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\paragraph{Ablation on prior information}\n\\label{para:info-ablation}\nTo investigate how different types of prior information affect agent performance, we conduct an ablation study by removing object appearance descriptions and prior location information. As shown in figure~\\ref{fig:info_cr}, prior location information is critical for task completion, as it helps agents quickly locate target objects and reduces inefficient exploration. Removing location information leads to a substantial performance drop across all models. In contrast, the effect of appearance descriptions is model-dependent: GPT-5-mini benefits from appearance cues, Gemma4-31B shows only minor changes, and Qwen3-32B-VL performs worse with appearance-only priors than with no prior. A possible reason is that models with weaker fine-grained visual grounding are more susceptible to misleading appearance descriptions and may confuse visually similar objects. Detailed results are reported in Table~\\ref{tab:parallel_prior_ablation}.\n\n\\begin{table}[!h]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\caption{Results on Parallel tasks with noise location prior cross models.}\n\\newcommand{\\graycell}[1]{\\cellcolor{gray!10}#1}\n\\label{tab:parallel_noise_agents}\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n\\begin{tabular}{lcccc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Model} & \\textbf{\\#Agents} & \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} & \\textbf{AUC} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{GPT-5-mini}\n & 1 & 0.760 & 0.902 & 0.719 \\\\\n & \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{0.823} & \\graycell{0.950} & \\graycell{0.709} \\\\\n\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Qwen3.5-9B}\n & 1 & 0.781 & 0.911 & 0.665 \\\\\n & \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{0.812} & \\graycell{0.903} & \\graycell{0.663} \\\\\n\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Qwen3-32B-VL}\n & 1 & 0.542 & 0.750 & 0.526 \\\\\n & \\graycell{2} & \\graycell{0.698} & \\graycell{0.878} & \\graycell{0.620} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\paragraph{Noisy location priors.}\nTable~\\ref{tab:parallel_noise_agents} reports detailed results on parallel tasks where 30\\% of the prior location information is noisy, comparing single-agent and two-agent settings.\n\n\\subsection{Additional Performance Analysis}\n\\label{app:obj-num}\nFigure~\\ref{fig:all-task-obj} reports performance by the number of target objects across model groups. As each target object corresponds to a subgoal, a larger number of target objects indicates higher task complexity. Overall, both completion rate and success rate decline as task complexity increases.\n\n\\section{Emergent collaborative behavior}\nBy analyzing the communication and action trajectories under the basic broadcast protocol, we identify several emergent collaborative behavior patterns. In addition to the analysis in Section~\\ref{sec:how-agent-collab}, this section provides representative examples and further details.\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{5pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.15}\n\\caption{Examples of collaborative behaviors emerge in the agent interactions in MECoBench under broadcast protocol.}\n\\label{tab:collab_behavior_examples}\n\\begin{tabularx}{\\textwidth}{@{}p{2.0cm} p{1.9cm} X@{}}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Category} & \\textbf{Behavior} & \\textbf{Example} \\\\\n\\midrule\n% --- Information Sharing ---\n\\multirow{3}{2.0cm}{\\parbox{3.0cm}{\\textit{Information \\\\Sharing}}}\n& \\textit{Info-Plan}\n& ``\\hl{I will grab the two puddings and check the fridge for the wine.}\n Could you go to the living room to find the cupcake?'' \\\\[2pt]\n& \\textit{Info-Loc}\n& ``\\hl{I am in the bathroom} and will head to the kitchen to look for the\n pudding and cupcake.'' \\\\[2pt]\n& \\textit{Info-Obj}\n& ``\\hl{I see the cupcake on the desk.} I will grab it and then head to the\n living room.'' \\\\\n\\cmidrule(l){1-3}\n% --- Task Coordination ---\n\\multirow{2}{2.0cm}{\\textit{Task \\\\Coordination}}\n& \\textit{Act-Del}\n& ``\\hl{Please go to the kitchen to grab the second apple,} and then we can\n meet at the coffee table.'' \\\\[2pt]\n& \\textit{Task-Assign}\n& ``\\hl{I'll handle the kitchen and the bathroom.}'' \\\\\n\\cmidrule(l){1-3}\n% --- Alignment and Correction ---\n\\multirow{4}{2.0cm}{\\textit{Alignment \\&\\\\Correction}}\n& \\textit{Coord-Q.}\n& \\textbf{State confirmation:}\n ``\\hl{Do you have the cupcake and the second apple?} If not, please check\n the fridge.''\\\\[3pt]\n& & \\textbf{Location confirmation:}\n ``I'm at door~287 holding the cupcake. \\hl{Are you at door~287 and ready\n to receive?} Please confirm.'' \\\\[4pt]\n& \\textit{Correct.}\n& \\textbf{Self-correction:}\n ``\\hl{I accidentally grabbed a waterglass instead of the wineglass.}\n I will put it back and then get the wineglass.''\\\\[3pt]\n& & \\textbf{Peer-correction:}\n ``Agent~0, \\hl{I see you're holding milk, but we need the juice.}\n Please drop the milk and grab the correct juice from the kitchen table.'' \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabularx}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\subsection{Examples}\n\\label{app:4.3}\nTable~\\ref{tab:collab_behavior_examples} presents representative examples of collaborative behaviors, with the relevant text spans highlighted in yellow.\n\n\\subsection{Detailed Analysis}\n\\label{app:4.3-1}\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\centering\n\\footnotesize\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3.2pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.12}\n\\caption{Coordination queries are associated with harder coordination\nstates. \\textit{Q.} denotes coordination query.}\n\\label{tab:coord_q_analysis}\n\\begin{tabular}{llccccc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Task} & \\textbf{Group} & \\textbf{\\#Case}\n& \\textbf{Avg.} & \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{Stuck}\n& \\textbf{Neg.} \\\\\n& & & \\textbf{\\#Obj.} & \\textbf{(\\%)}\n& \\textbf{(\\%)} & \\textbf{(\\%)} \\\\\n\\midrule\nParallel\n& w/ Q. & 370 & 4.70 & 64.6 & 8.4 & 11.1 \\\\\n& w/o Q. & 1727 & 4.35 & 74.7 & 2.0 & 4.5 \\\\\n\\midrule\nSequential\n& w/ Q. & 591 & 4.51 & 32.3 & 3.9 & 6.6 \\\\\n& w/o Q. & 627 & 4.30 & 47.8 & 1.6 & 3.2 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table}[!t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3.2pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.08}\n\\caption{Overall and wrong-grab-conditional effects of correction.\n\\textit{Corr.} and \\textit{WG} denote correction and wrong grab.\n\\textit{WG-Cond}. denotes cases where at least one wrong grab happened.}\n\\label{tab:correction_overall}\n\\begin{tabular}{lllrrr}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Task} & \\textbf{Cond.} & \\textbf{Group}\n& \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR} & \\textbf{\\#WG} \\\\\n& & & \\textbf{(\\%)} & \\textbf{(\\%)} & \\\\\n\\midrule\n\n\\multirow{7}{*}{Parallel}\n& \\multirow{3}{*}{Overall}\n& w/ Corr. & 67.3 & 90.1 & 3.05 \\\\\n&& w/o Corr. & 74.1 & 88.5 & 1.37 \\\\\n&& $\\Delta$ & $-6.7$ & $+1.6$ & -- \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){2-6}\n& \\multirow{4}{*}{WG}\n& w/ Corr. & 61.1 & 88.3 & 3.79 \\\\\n&& w/o Corr. & 66.2 & 87.0 & 2.84 \\\\\n&& Raw $\\Delta$ & $-5.1$ & $+1.3$ & -- \\\\\n&& Adj. $\\Delta$ & $\\mathbf{+2.4}$ & $\\mathbf{+3.5}$ & -- \\\\\n\n\\midrule\n\n\\multirow{7}{*}{Sequential}\n& \\multirow{3}{*}{Overall}\n& w/ Corr. & 29.8 & 67.4 & 2.68 \\\\\n&& w/o Corr. & 41.1 & 59.8 & 0.76 \\\\\n&& $\\Delta$ & $-11.3$ & $+7.7$ & -- \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){2-6}\n& \\multirow{4}{*}{WG}\n& w/ Corr. & 26.9 & 67.2 & 4.33 \\\\\n&& w/o Corr. & 21.1 & 53.4 & 3.02 \\\\\n&& Raw $\\Delta$ & $+5.8$ & $+13.8$ & -- \\\\\n&& Adj. $\\Delta$ & $\\mathbf{+11.8}$ & $\\mathbf{+15.4}$ & -- \\\\\n\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\paragraph{Coordination Queries Indicate Collaboration Challenges.}\nIn the main text (Table~\\ref{tab:micro_behavior}), coordination query correlates negatively with SR and CR. To further investigate the underlying cause, we introduce two behavioral indicators of collaboration difficulty: negative report (\\textit{Neg.}), where an agent reports failing to locate a target object at a specific location, and \\textit{stuck}, where an agent reports being stuck in middle.\nAs shown in Table~\\ref{tab:coord_q_analysis}, cases with coordination query involve more objects on average and exhibit substantially higher stuck and negative report rate. This pattern holds across both task types, suggesting that coordination query serves as a reactive signal to genuine collaboration obstacles.\n\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{2.6pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.08}\n\\caption{Correction effects in parallel tasks stratified by the\nnumber of wrong grabs.}\n\\label{tab:parallel_correction_strata}\n\\begin{tabular}{clrrrr}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{\\#WG} & \\textbf{Group} & \\textbf{\\#Case}\n& \\textbf{SR} & \\textbf{CR}\n& \\textbf{$\\Delta$SR/CR} \\\\\n& & & \\textbf{(\\%)} & \\textbf{(\\%)} & \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{1}\n& Corr. & 70 & 82.9 & 95.2 & \\multirow{2}{*}{$+2.2/+3.7$} \\\\\n& No Corr. & 351 & 80.6 & 91.5 & \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{2}\n& Corr. & 53 & 69.8 & 89.3 & \\multirow{2}{*}{$-6.2/-1.5$} \\\\\n& No Corr. & 200 & 76.0 & 90.8 & \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{3}\n& Corr. & 44 & 68.2 & 91.9 & \\multirow{2}{*}{$+6.9/+4.1$} \\\\\n& No Corr. & 80 & 61.3 & 87.8 & \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{$4+$}\n& Corr. & 118 & 41.5 & 82.4 & \\multirow{2}{*}{$+7.4/+6.8$} \\\\\n& No Corr. & 208 & 34.1 & 75.6 & \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{3}{l}{Adjusted effect}\n& \\multicolumn{2}{r}{$\\Delta$SR/CR}\n& $\\mathbf{+2.4/+3.5}$ \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{6pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.3}\n\\caption{Representative examples of multi-agent collaboration failure modes.}\n\\label{tab:failure_mode_examples}\n\\begin{tabularx}{\\textwidth}{p{3.0cm} p{2.5cm} X}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Failure Mode} & \\textbf{Subtype} & \\textbf{Representative Trace Excerpt} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\n\n\\textbf{Agent-induced Conflict}\n & Duplicate Grab\n & \\textbf{Agent~1:} \\textit{``I found the wine on the coffee table.\n I will grab it and bring it to the living room.''}\n \\newline\\smallskip\n \\textbf{Agent~4:} \\textit{``I am grabbing the wine from the coffee table.\n I will take it to the living room.''}\n \\newline\\smallskip\n $\\Rightarrow$ Both agents execute \\texttt{[grab]~<wine>}.\n \\\\[2pt]\n\n\\midrule\n\n\\multirow{2}{3.0cm}{\\raggedright\\textbf{Hallucinated Belief Propagation}}\n & False Completion\n & \\textit{``All items have been successfully placed on the bathroom counter.\n The task is complete.''}\n \\newline\\smallskip\n $\\Rightarrow$ All agents execute \\texttt{[wait]} until the end.\n \\\\[2pt]\n\n\\cmidrule(lr){2-3}\n\n & Object Misidentification\n & \\textbf{Agent~3:} \\textit{``I have found and will now grab\n the \\textbf{wineglass} from the bedroom cabinet.''}\n \\newline\\smallskip\n Agent~3 executes \\texttt{[grab]~<dishbowl>} (misidentifying dishbowl as wineglass),\n then \\texttt{[put]~<dishbowl>} on the kitchentable.\n \\newline\\smallskip\n \\textbf{Agent~0 \\& 2:} \\textit{``Agent~3 has already grabbed the\n wineglass---I will focus on the plate / waterglass.''}\n \\newline\\smallskip\n $\\Rightarrow$ All agents stop searching for the actual wineglass.\n Task ends with \\texttt{wineglass} unsatisfied.\n \\\\\n\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabularx}\n\\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\paragraph{Correction Helps Recover from Errors}\nSection~\\ref{sec:how-agent-collab} shows that correction correlates negatively with SR but positively with CR, suggesting a potential role in error recovery. To examine this effect, we analyze its co-occurrence with wrong grabs (WGs), defined as actions that grasp task-irrelevant objects. Table~\\ref{tab:correction_overall} shows that episodes with correction contain substantially more WGs than those without, indicating that correction is mainly triggered by execution errors. Since WG episodes with correction also exhibit greater error severity, direct comparison may underestimate its recovery benefit. We therefore stratify WG episodes by error count and compute a weighted adjusted effect using shared stratum weights for both groups (Table~\\ref{tab:parallel_correction_strata}). After adjustment, correction consistently improves both SR and CR across task types, confirming its effectiveness in error recovery. Stratum-level results further show larger gains under higher WG counts, suggesting that correction is especially useful when errors are more severe.\n\n\\section{Failure Mode Analysis}\n\\label{app:fail}\nIn this section, we provide additional examples and a more detailed analysis of the multi-agent collaboration failure modes presented in Section~\\ref{sec:fail}.\n\n\\subsection{Examples}\nTable~\\ref{tab:failure_mode_examples} presents representative examples of different failure modes.\n\n\\subsection{Detailed Analysis}\n\n\\begin{table}[!h]\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{2pt}\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.08}\n\\caption{\\textbf{Failure mode in collaboration.} \\emph{Freq.} denotes the fraction of episodes containing the behavior; \\emph{lift} is the ratio of its rate in failed episodes to that in successful episodes.}\n\\label{tab:failure-behaviors}\n\\begin{tabular}{llrrrr}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Behavior} & \\textbf{Task} & \\textbf{Freq.} & \\textbf{Lift} & \\textbf{SR w/} & \\textbf{$\\Delta$SR} \\\\\n\\midrule\nHallucinated & Parallel & 1.0\\% & $\\infty$ & 0.0\\% & $-$73.7 \\\\\ncompletion & Sequential & 1.5\\% & $\\infty$ & 0.0\\% & $-$40.9 \\\\\n\\midrule\nGrab conflict & Parallel & 22.9\\% & 1.5$\\times$ & 71.4\\% & $-$9.0 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\vspace{-8pt}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{figure}[h]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{appendix/exp/dup_grab_rate.pdf}\n \\caption{Duplicate grab rate of different models in parallel task under 2-agent team and broadcast protocol.}\n \\label{fig:2-agent-grab}\n\\end{figure}\nTable~\\ref{tab:failure-behaviors} summarizes the occurrence frequency of different failure modes and their impact on success rate (SR), aggregated over all models and team sizes under the broadcast protocol. Figure~\\ref{fig:2-agent-grab} compares duplicate-grab rates across models in two-agent teams.\n% \\subsection{Error Analysis}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: custom.bib\n================================================\n% Use this file for citations not found in the ACL Anthology (contained in \"anthology.bib\").\n\n@book{Aho:72,\n author = {Alfred V. Aho and Jeffrey D. Ullman},\n title = {The Theory of Parsing, Translation and Compiling},\n year = \"1972\",\n volume = \"1\",\n publisher = {Prentice-Hall},\n address = {Englewood Cliffs, NJ}\n}\n\n@book{APA:83,\n author = {{American Psychological Association}},\n title = {Publications Manual},\n year = \"1983\",\n publisher = {American Psychological Association},\n address = {Washington, DC}\n}\n\n@article{Chandra:81,\n\tauthor = {Ashok K. Chandra and Dexter C. Kozen and Larry J. Stockmeyer},\n\tyear = \"1981\",\n\ttitle = {Alternation},\n\tjournal = {Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery},\n\tvolume = \"28\",\n\tnumber = \"1\",\n\tpages = \"114--133\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1145/322234.322243\",\n}\n\n@inproceedings{andrew2007scalable,\n title={Scalable training of {L1}-regularized log-linear models},\n author={Andrew, Galen and Gao, Jianfeng},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning},\n pages={33--40},\n year={2007},\n}\n\n@book{Gusfield:97,\n author = {Dan Gusfield},\n title = {Algorithms on Strings, Trees and Sequences},\n year = \"1997\",\n publisher = {Cambridge University Press},\n address = {Cambridge, UK}\n}\n\n@article{rasooli-tetrault-2015,\n author = {Mohammad Sadegh Rasooli and Joel R. Tetreault},\n title = {Yara Parser: {A} Fast and Accurate Dependency Parser},\n journal = {Computing Research Repository},\n volume = {arXiv:1503.06733},\n year = {2015},\n url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.06733},\n note = {version 2}\n}\n\n@article{Ando2005,\n\tAcmid = {1194905},\n\tAuthor = {Ando, Rie Kubota and Zhang, Tong},\n\tIssn = {1532-4435},\n\tIssue_Date = {12/1/2005},\n\tJournal = {Journal of Machine Learning Research},\n\tMonth = dec,\n\tNumpages = {37},\n\tPages = {1817--1853},\n\tPublisher = {JMLR.org},\n\tTitle = {A Framework for Learning Predictive Structures from Multiple Tasks and Unlabeled Data},\n\tVolume = {6},\n\tYear = {2005}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{\npuig2021watchandhelp,\ntitle={Watch-And-Help: A Challenge for Social Perception and Human-{\\{}AI{\\}} Collaboration},\nauthor={Xavier Puig and Tianmin Shu and Shuang Li and Zilin Wang and Yuan-Hong Liao and Joshua B. Tenenbaum and Sanja Fidler and Antonio Torralba},\nbooktitle={International Conference on Learning Representations},\nyear={2021},\nurl={https://openreview.net/forum?id=w_7JMpGZRh0}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Puig_2018_CVPR,\nauthor = {Puig, Xavier and Ra, Kevin and Boben, Marko and Li, Jiaman and Wang, Tingwu and Fidler, Sanja and Torralba, Antonio},\ntitle = {VirtualHome: Simulating Household Activities via Programs},\nbooktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\nmonth = {June},\nyear = {2018}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhu-etal-2025-multiagentbench,\n title = \"{M}ulti{A}gent{B}ench : Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of {LLM} agents\",\n author = \"Zhu, Kunlun and\n Du, Hongyi and\n Hong, Zhaochen and\n Yang, Xiaocheng and\n Guo, Shuyi and\n Wang, Zhe and\n Wang, Zhenhailong and\n Qian, Cheng and\n Tang, Xiangru and\n Ji, Heng and\n You, Jiaxuan\",\n editor = \"Che, Wanxiang and\n Nabende, Joyce and\n Shutova, Ekaterina and\n Pilehvar, Mohammad Taher\",\n booktitle = \"Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)\",\n month = jul,\n year = \"2025\",\n address = \"Vienna, Austria\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computational Linguistics\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.421/\",\n doi = \"10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.421\",\n pages = \"8580--8622\",\n ISBN = \"979-8-89176-251-0\",\n abstract = \"Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as autonomous agents; yet existing benchmarks either focus on single-agent tasks or are confined to narrow domains, failing to capture the dynamics of multi-agent coordination and competition. In this paper, we introduce \\textbf{MultiAgentBench}, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate LLM-based multi-agent systems across diverse, interactive scenarios. Our framework measures not only task completion but also the quality of collaboration and competition using novel, milestone-based key performance indicators. Moreover, we evaluate various coordination protocols (including star, chain, tree, and graph topologies) and innovative strategies such as group discussion and cognitive planning. Notably, gpt-4o-mini reaches the average highest task score, graph structure performs the best among coordination protocols in the research scenario,and cognitive planning improves milestone achievement rates by 3{\\%}. Code and datasets are publicavailable at \\url{https://github.com/ulab-uiuc/MARBLE}.\"\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{sun-etal-2025-collab,\n title = \"Collab-Overcooked: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Language Models as Collaborative Agents\",\n author = \"Sun, Haochen and\n Zhang, Shuwen and\n Niu, Lujie and\n Ren, Lei and\n Xu, Hao and\n Fu, Hao and\n Zhao, Fangkun and\n Yuan, Caixia and\n Wang, Xiaojie\",\n editor = \"Christodoulopoulos, Christos and\n Chakraborty, Tanmoy and\n Rose, Carolyn and\n Peng, Violet\",\n booktitle = \"Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing\",\n month = nov,\n year = \"2025\",\n address = \"Suzhou, China\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computational Linguistics\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2025.emnlp-main.249/\",\n doi = \"10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.249\",\n pages = \"4922--4951\",\n ISBN = \"979-8-89176-332-6\",\n abstract = \"Large Language Models (LLMs) based agent systems have made great strides in real-world applications beyond traditional NLP tasks. This paper proposes a new LLM-based Multi-Agent System (LLM-MAS) benchmark, Collab-Overcooked, built on the popular Overcooked-AI game with more applicable and challenging tasks in interactive environments. Collab-Overcooked extends existing benchmarks in two novel ways. First, it provides a multi-agent framework supporting diverse tasks and objectives and encourages collaboration through natural language communication. Second, it introduces a spectrum of process-oriented evaluation metrics to assess the fine-grained collaboration capabilities of different LLM agents, a dimension often overlooked in prior work. We conduct extensive experiments with 13 popular LLMs and show that, while the LLMs exhibit a strong ability in goal interpretation, there are significant shortcomings in active collaboration and continuous adaptation, which are critical for efficiently fulfilling complex tasks. Notably, we highlight the strengths and weaknesses of LLM-MAS and provide insights for improving and evaluating LLM-MAS on a unified and open-source benchmark. The environments, 30 open-ended tasks, and the evaluation package are publicly available at https://github.com/YusaeMeow/Collab-Overcooked.\"\n}\n\n@inproceedings{ICLR2024_578e65cd,\n author = {Chen, Weize and Su, Yusheng and Zuo, Jingwei and Yang, Cheng and Yuan, Chenfei and Chan, Chi-Min and Yu, Heyang and Lu, Yaxi and Hung, Yi-Hsin and Qian, Chen and Qin, Yujia and Cong, Xin and Xie, Ruobing and Liu, Zhiyuan and Sun, Maosong and Zhou, Jie},\n booktitle = {International Conference on Learning Representations},\n editor = {B. Kim and Y. Yue and S. Chaudhuri and K. Fragkiadaki and M. Khan and Y. Sun},\n pages = {20094--20136},\n title = {AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviors},\n url = {https://proceedings.iclr.cc/paper_files/paper/2024/file/578e65cdee35d00c708d4c64bce32971-Paper-Conference.pdf},\n volume = {2024},\n year = {2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{NEURIPS2025_f1320d2e,\n author = {Dang, Yufan and Qian, Chen and Luo, Xueheng and Fan, Jingru and Xie, Zihao and Shi, Ruijie and Chen, Weize and Yang, Cheng and Che, Xiaoyin and Tian, Ye and Xiong, Xuantang and Han, Lei and Liu, Zhiyuan and Sun, Maosong},\n booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n editor = {D. Belgrave and C. Zhang and H. Lin and R. Pascanu and P. Koniusz and M. Ghassemi and N. Chen},\n pages = {165025--165059},\n publisher = {Curran Associates, Inc.},\n title = {Multi-Agent Collaboration via Evolving Orchestration},\n url = {https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2025/file/f1320d2e2842169c6fc89dcbd80e94d0-Paper-Conference.pdf},\n volume = {38},\n year = {2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{\nyang2025embodiedbench,\ntitle={EmbodiedBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for Vision-Driven Embodied Agents},\nauthor={Rui Yang and Hanyang Chen and Junyu Zhang and Mark Zhao and Cheng Qian and Kangrui Wang and Qineng Wang and Teja Venkat Koripella and Marziyeh Movahedi and Manling Li and Heng Ji and Huan Zhang and Tong Zhang},\nbooktitle={Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learning},\nyear={2025},\nurl={https://openreview.net/forum?id=DgGF2LEBPS}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{\nliu2025visualagentbench,\ntitle={VisualAgentBench: Towards Large Multimodal Models as Visual Foundation Agents},\nauthor={Xiao Liu and Tianjie Zhang and Yu Gu and Iat Long Iong and Song XiXuan and Yifan Xu and Shudan Zhang and Hanyu Lai and Jiadai Sun and Xinyue Yang and Yu Yang and Zehan Qi and Shuntian Yao and Xueqiao Sun and Siyi Cheng and Qinkai Zheng and Hao Yu and Hanchen Zhang and Wenyi Hong and Ming Ding and Lihang Pan and Xiaotao Gu and Aohan Zeng and Zhengxiao Du and Chan Hee Song and Yu Su and Yuxiao Dong and Jie Tang},\nbooktitle={The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations},\nyear={2025},\nurl={https://openreview.net/forum?id=2snKOc7TVp}\n}\n\n@misc{openai2026gpt54thinking,\n title = {GPT-5.4 Thinking System Card},\n author = {{OpenAI}},\n year = {2026},\n month = mar,\n howpublished = {\\url{https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-4-thinking-system-card/}},\n note = {Accessed: 2026-05-26}\n}\n@misc{googledeepmind2026gemini31pro,\n title = {{Gemini 3.1 Pro Model Card}},\n author = {{Google DeepMind}},\n year = {2026},\n month = feb,\n howpublished = {\\url{https://deepmind.google/models/model-cards/gemini-3-1-pro/}},\n note = {Published February 2026. Accessed May 23, 2026}\n}\n\n@misc{anthropic2026claudeopus47systemcard,\n title = {{Claude Opus 4.7 System Card}},\n author = {{Anthropic}},\n year = {2026},\n month = apr,\n howpublished = {\\url{https://www.anthropic.com/system-cards}},\n note = {System card PDF available at \\url{https://cdn.sanity.io/files/4zrzovbb/website/037f06850df7fbe871e206dad004c3db5fd50340.pdf}. Accessed May 23, 2026}\n}\n\n@article{sycara1998multiagent,\n title={Multiagent systems},\n author={Sycara, Katia P},\n journal={AI magazine},\n volume={19},\n number={2},\n pages={79--79},\n year={1998}\n}\n\n@article{Stone2000,\n author = {Stone, Peter and Veloso, Manuela},\n title = {Multiagent Systems: A Survey from a Machine Learning Perspective},\n journal = {Autonomous Robots},\n year = {2000},\n volume = {8},\n number = {3},\n pages = {345--383},\n doi = {10.1023/A:1008942012299},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008942012299}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{schmidgall-etal-2025-agent,\n title = \"Agent Laboratory: Using {LLM} Agents as Research Assistants\",\n author = \"Schmidgall, Samuel and\n Su, Yusheng and\n Wang, Ze and\n Sun, Ximeng and\n Wu, Jialian and\n Yu, Xiaodong and\n Liu, Jiang and\n Moor, Michael and\n Liu, Zicheng and\n Barsoum, Emad\",\n editor = \"Christodoulopoulos, Christos and\n Chakraborty, Tanmoy and\n Rose, Carolyn and\n Peng, Violet\",\n booktitle = \"Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025\",\n month = nov,\n year = \"2025\",\n address = \"Suzhou, China\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computational Linguistics\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-emnlp.320/\",\n doi = \"10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.320\",\n pages = \"5977--6043\",\n ISBN = \"979-8-89176-335-7\",\n abstract = \"Historically, scientific discovery has been a lengthy and costly process, demanding substantial time and resources from initial conception to final results. To accelerate scientific discovery, reduce research costs, and improve research quality, we introduce Agent Laboratory, an autonomous LLM-based framework capable of completing the entire research process. This framework accepts a human-provided research idea and progresses through three stages{--}literature review, experimentation, and report writing{--}in order to produce research, including a code repository and a research report, while enabling users to provide feedback and guidance at each stage. We deploy Agent Laboratory with various state-of-the-art LLMs and invite multiple researchers to assess its quality by participating in a survey, providing human feedback to guide the research process, and then evaluate the final paper. We found that: (1) Agent Laboratory driven by o1-preview generates the best research outcomes; (2) The generated machine learning code is able to achieve state-of-the-art performance compared to existing methods; (3) Incorporating human involvement improves the overall quality of research; (4) Agent Laboratory reduces research expenses, achieving an 84{\\%} decrease compared to previous autonomous research methods. We hope Agent Laboratory enables researchers to allocate more effort toward creative ideation rather than low-level coding and writing, ultimately accelerating scientific discovery.\"\n}\n\n@inproceedings{su-etal-2025-many,\n title = \"Many Heads Are Better Than One: Improved Scientific Idea Generation by A {LLM}-Based Multi-Agent System\",\n author = \"Su, Haoyang and\n Chen, Renqi and\n Tang, Shixiang and\n Yin, Zhenfei and\n Zheng, Xinzhe and\n Li, Jinzhe and\n Qi, Biqing and\n Wu, Qi and\n Li, Hui and\n Ouyang, Wanli and\n Torr, Philip and\n Zhou, Bowen and\n Dong, Nanqing\",\n editor = \"Che, Wanxiang and\n Nabende, Joyce and\n Shutova, Ekaterina and\n Pilehvar, Mohammad Taher\",\n booktitle = \"Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)\",\n month = jul,\n year = \"2025\",\n address = \"Vienna, Austria\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computational Linguistics\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.1368/\",\n doi = \"10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1368\",\n pages = \"28201--28240\",\n ISBN = \"979-8-89176-251-0\",\n abstract = \"The rapid advancement of scientific progress requires innovative tools that can accelerate knowledge discovery. Although recent AI methods, particularly large language models (LLMs), have shown promise in tasks such as hypothesis generation and experimental design, they fall short of replicating the collaborative nature of real-world scientific practices, where diverse experts work together in teams to tackle complex problems. To address the limitations, we propose an LLM-based multi-agent system, i.e., Virtual Scientists (VIRSCI), designed to mimic the teamwork inherent in scientific research. VIRSCI organizes a team of agents to collaboratively generate, evaluate, and refine research ideas. Through comprehensive experiments, we demonstrate that this multi-agent approach outperforms the state-of-the-art method in producing novel scientific ideas. We further investigate the collaboration mechanisms that contribute to its tendency to produce ideas with higher novelty, offering valuable insights to guide future research and illuminating pathways toward building a robust system for autonomous scientific discovery. The code is available at https://github.com/open-sciencelab/Virtual-Scientists.\"\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{ICLR2024_6507b115,\n author = {Hong, Sirui and Zhuge, Mingchen and Chen, Jonathan and Zheng, Xiawu and Cheng, Yuheng and Wang, Jinlin and Zhang, Ceyao and wang, zili and Yau, Steven and Lin, Zijuan and Zhou, Liyang and Ran, Chenyu and Xiao, Lingfeng and Wu, Chenglin and Schmidhuber, J\\\"{u}rgen},\n booktitle = {International Conference on Learning Representations},\n editor = {B. Kim and Y. Yue and S. Chaudhuri and K. Fragkiadaki and M. Khan and Y. Sun},\n pages = {23247--23275},\n title = {MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework},\n url = {https://proceedings.iclr.cc/paper_files/paper/2024/file/6507b115562bb0a305f1958ccc87355a-Paper-Conference.pdf},\n volume = {2024},\n year = {2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{islam-etal-2025-codesim,\n title = \"{C}ode{S}im: Multi-Agent Code Generation and Problem Solving through Simulation-Driven Planning and Debugging\",\n author = \"Islam, Md. Ashraful and\n Ali, Mohammed Eunus and\n Parvez, Md Rizwan\",\n editor = \"Chiruzzo, Luis and\n Ritter, Alan and\n Wang, Lu\",\n booktitle = \"Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2025\",\n month = apr,\n year = \"2025\",\n address = \"Albuquerque, New Mexico\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computational Linguistics\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-naacl.285/\",\n doi = \"10.18653/v1/2025.findings-naacl.285\",\n pages = \"5128--5154\",\n ISBN = \"979-8-89176-195-7\"\n}\n\n@inproceedings{fan-etal-2025-ai,\n title = \"{AI} Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulator\",\n author = \"Fan, Zhihao and\n Wei, Lai and\n Tang, Jialong and\n Chen, Wei and\n Siyuan, Wang and\n Wei, Zhongyu and\n Huang, Fei\",\n editor = \"Rambow, Owen and\n Wanner, Leo and\n Apidianaki, Marianna and\n Al-Khalifa, Hend and\n Eugenio, Barbara Di and\n Schockaert, Steven\",\n booktitle = \"Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics\",\n month = jan,\n year = \"2025\",\n address = \"Abu Dhabi, UAE\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computational Linguistics\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2025.coling-main.680/\",\n pages = \"10183--10213\",\n abstract = \"Artificial intelligence has significantly revolutionized healthcare, particularly through large language models (LLMs) that demonstrate superior performance in static medical question answering benchmarks. However, evaluating the potential of LLMs for real-world clinical applications remains challenging due to the intricate nature of doctor-patient interactions. To address this, we introduce AI Hospital, a multi-agent framework emulating dynamic medical interactions between Doctor as player and NPCs including Patient and Examiner. This setup allows for more practical assessments of LLMs in simulated clinical scenarios. We develop the Multi-View Medical Evaluation (MVME) benchmark, utilizing high-quality Chinese medical records and multiple evaluation strategies to quantify the performance of LLM-driven Doctor agents on symptom collection, examination recommendations, and diagnoses. Additionally, a dispute resolution collaborative mechanism is proposed to enhance medical interaction capabilities through iterative discussions. Despite improvements, current LLMs (including GPT-4) still exhibit significant performance gaps in multi-turn interactive scenarios compared to non-interactive scenarios. Our findings highlight the need for further research to bridge these gaps and improve LLMs' clinical decision-making capabilities. Our data, code, and experimental results are all open-sourced at https://github.com/LibertFan/AI{\\_}Hospital.\"\n}\n\n@article{Chen2025MAC,\n author = {Chen, Xi and Yi, Huahui and You, Mingke and Liu, WeiZhi and Wang, Li and Li, Hairui and Zhang, Xue and Guo, Yingman and Fan, Lei and Chen, Gang and Lao, Qicheng and Fu, Weili and Li, Kang and Li, Jian},\n title = {Enhancing Diagnostic Capability with Multi-Agents Conversational Large Language Models},\n journal = {npj Digital Medicine},\n year = {2025},\n volume = {8},\n number = {1},\n pages = {159},\n doi = {10.1038/s41746-025-01550-0},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01550-0},\n issn = {2398-6352}\n}\n\n@misc{piao2025agentsociety,\n title = {AgentSociety: Large-Scale Simulation of LLM-Driven Generative Agents Advances Understanding of Human Behaviors and Society},\n author = {Piao, Jinghua and Yan, Yuwei and Zhang, Jun and Li, Nian and Yan, Junbo and Lan, Xiaochong and Lu, Zhihong and Zheng, Zhiheng and Wang, Jing Yi and Zhou, Di and Gao, Chen and Xu, Fengli and Zhang, Fang and Rong, Ke and Su, Jun and Li, Yong},\n year = {2025},\n howpublished = {Available at SSRN},\n url = {https://ssrn.com/abstract=5954414},\n doi = {10.2139/ssrn.5954414}\n}\n\n@misc{yu2024minelandsimulatinglargescalemultiagent,\n title={MineLand: Simulating Large-Scale Multi-Agent Interactions with Limited Multimodal Senses and Physical Needs}, \n author={Xianhao Yu and Jiaqi Fu and Renjia Deng and Wenjuan Han},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2403.19267},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CL},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.19267}, \n}\n\n@inproceedings{dong-etal-2024-villageragent,\n title = \"{V}illager{A}gent: A Graph-Based Multi-Agent Framework for Coordinating Complex Task Dependencies in {M}inecraft\",\n author = \"Dong, Yubo and\n Zhu, Xukun and\n Pan, Zhengzhe and\n Zhu, Linchao and\n Yang, Yi\",\n editor = \"Ku, Lun-Wei and\n Martins, Andre and\n Srikumar, Vivek\",\n booktitle = \"Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024\",\n month = aug,\n year = \"2024\",\n address = \"Bangkok, Thailand\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computational Linguistics\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-acl.964/\",\n doi = \"10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.964\",\n pages = \"16290--16314\",\n abstract = \"In this paper, we aim to evaluate multi-agent systems against complex dependencies, including spatial, causal, and temporal constraints. First, we construct a new benchmark, named VillagerBench, within the Minecraft environment. VillagerBench comprises diverse tasks crafted to test various aspects of multi-agent collaboration, from workload distribution to dynamic adaptation and synchronized task execution. Second, we introduce a Directed Acyclic Graph Multi-Agent Framework (VillagerAgent) to resolve complex inter-agent dependencies and enhance collaborative efficiency. This solution incorporates a task decomposer that creates a directed acyclic graph (DAG) for structured task management, an agent controller for task distribution, and a state manager for tracking environmental and agent data.Our empirical evaluation on VillagerBench demonstrates that VillagerAgentoutperforms the existing AgentVerse model, reducing hallucinations and improving task decomposition efficacy. The results underscore VillagerAgent{'}s potential in advancing multi-agent collaboration, offering a scalable and generalizable solution in dynamic environments. Source code is open-source on GitHub.\"\n}\n\n@inproceedings{ICLR2025_66a026c0,\n author = {Qian, Chen and Xie, Zihao and Wang, YiFei and Liu, Wei and Zhu, Kunlun and Xia, Hanchen and Dang, Yufan and Du, Zhuoyun and Chen, Weize and Yang, Cheng and Liu, Zhiyuan and Sun, Maosong},\n booktitle = {International Conference on Learning Representations},\n editor = {Y. Yue and A. Garg and N. Peng and F. Sha and R. Yu},\n pages = {41488--41505},\n title = {Scaling Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Collaboration},\n url = {https://proceedings.iclr.cc/paper_files/paper/2025/file/66a026c0d17040889b50f0dfa650e5e0-Paper-Conference.pdf},\n volume = {2025},\n year = {2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{NEURIPS2024_b631da75,\n author = {Li, Manling and Zhao, Shiyu and Wang, Qineng and Wang, Kangrui and Zhou, Yu and Srivastava, Sanjana and Gokmen, Cem and Lee, Tony and Li, Li and Zhang, Ruohan and Liu, Weiyu and Liang, Percy and Fei-Fei, Li and Mao, Jiayuan and Wu, Jiajun},\n booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n doi = {10.52202/079017-3188},\n editor = {A. Globerson and L. Mackey and D. Belgrave and A. Fan and U. Paquet and J. Tomczak and C. Zhang},\n pages = {100428--100534},\n publisher = {Curran Associates, Inc.},\n title = {Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making},\n url = {https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2024/file/b631da756d1573c24c9ba9c702fde5a9-Paper-Datasets_and_Benchmarks_Track.pdf},\n volume = {37},\n year = {2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{NEURIPS2022_27c546ab,\n author = {Deitke, Matt and VanderBilt, Eli and Herrasti, Alvaro and Weihs, Luca and Ehsani, Kiana and Salvador, Jordi and Han, Winson and Kolve, Eric and Kembhavi, Aniruddha and Mottaghi, Roozbeh},\n booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n editor = {S. Koyejo and S. Mohamed and A. Agarwal and D. Belgrave and K. Cho and A. Oh},\n pages = {5982--5994},\n publisher = {Curran Associates, Inc.},\n title = {ProcTHOR: Large-Scale Embodied AI Using Procedural Generation},\n url = {https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/27c546ab1e4f1d7d638e6a8dfbad9a07-Paper-Conference.pdf},\n volume = {35},\n year = {2022}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Savva_2019_ICCV,\nauthor = {Savva, Manolis and Kadian, Abhishek and Maksymets, Oleksandr and Zhao, Yili and Wijmans, Erik and Jain, Bhavana and Straub, Julian and Liu, Jia and Koltun, Vladlen and Malik, Jitendra and Parikh, Devi and Batra, Dhruv},\ntitle = {Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Research},\nbooktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)},\nmonth = {October},\nyear = {2019}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{ICLR2025_a3cf318f,\n author = {Chang, Matthew and Chhablani, Gunjan and Clegg, Alexander and Dallaire Cote, Mikael and Desai, Ruta and Hlavac, Michal and Karashchuk, Vladimir and Krantz, Jacob and Mottaghi, Roozbeh and Parashar, Priyam and Patki, Siddharth and Prasad, Ishita and Puig, Xavier and Rai, Akshara and Ramrakhya, Ram and Tran, Daniel and Truong, Joanne and Turner, John and Undersander, Eric and Yang, Tsung-Yen},\n booktitle = {International Conference on Learning Representations},\n editor = {Y. Yue and A. Garg and N. Peng and F. Sha and R. Yu},\n pages = {65205--65268},\n title = {PARTNR: A Benchmark for Planning and Reasoning in Embodied Multi-agent Tasks},\n url = {https://proceedings.iclr.cc/paper_files/paper/2025/file/a3cf318fbeec1126da21e9185ae9908c-Paper-Conference.pdf},\n volume = {2025},\n year = {2025}\n}\n\n@article{zhang2024navid,\n title={NaVid: Video-based VLM Plans the Next Step for Vision-and-Language Navigation},\n author={Zhang, Jiazhao and Wang, Kunyu and Xu, Rongtao and Zhou, Gengze and Hong, Yicong and Fang, Xiaomeng and Wu, Qi and Zhang, Zhizheng and Wang, He},\n journal={Robotics: Science and Systems},\n year={2024}\n }\n\n\n@InProceedings{Yang_2024_CVPR,\n author = {Yang, Yijun and Zhou, Tianyi and Li, Kanxue and Tao, Dapeng and Li, Lusong and Shen, Li and He, Xiaodong and Jiang, Jing and Shi, Yuhui},\n title = {Embodied Multi-Modal Agent trained by an LLM from a Parallel TextWorld},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2024},\n pages = {26275-26285}\n}\n\n@article{monwilliams2025embodied,\n title = {Embodied large language models enable robots to complete complex tasks in unpredictable environments},\n author = {Mon-Williams, Ruaridh and Li, Gen and Long, Ran and Du, Wenqian and Lucas, Christopher G.},\n journal = {Nature Machine Intelligence},\n volume = {7},\n number = {4},\n pages = {592--601},\n year = {2025},\n doi = {10.1038/s42256-025-01005-x},\n pmid = {40391151},\n pmcid = {PMC12088599}\n}\n\n@misc{cheng2025embodiedevalevaluatemultimodalllms,\n title={EmbodiedEval: Evaluate Multimodal LLMs as Embodied Agents}, \n author={Zhili Cheng and Yuge Tu and Ran Li and Shiqi Dai and Jinyi Hu and Shengding Hu and Jiahao Li and Yang Shi and Tianyu Yu and Weize Chen and Lei Shi and Maosong Sun},\n year={2025},\n eprint={2501.11858},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11858}, \n}\n@inproceedings{\nszot2024large,\ntitle={Large Language Models as Generalizable Policies for Embodied Tasks},\nauthor={Andrew Szot and Max Schwarzer and Harsh Agrawal and Bogdan Mazoure and Rin Metcalf and Walter Talbott and Natalie Mackraz and R Devon Hjelm and Alexander T Toshev},\nbooktitle={The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations},\nyear={2024},\nurl={https://openreview.net/forum?id=u6imHU4Ebu}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{ICLR2025_7d03c6bf,\n author = {Zhang, Hongxin and Wang, Zeyuan and Lyu, Qiushi and Zhang, Zheyuan and Chen, Sunli and Shu, Tianmin and Dariush, Behzad and Lee, Kwonjoon and Du, Yilun and Gan, Chuang},\n booktitle = {International Conference on Learning Representations},\n editor = {Y. Yue and A. Garg and N. Peng and F. Sha and R. Yu},\n pages = {49996--50019},\n title = {COMBO: Compositional World Models for Embodied Multi-Agent Cooperation},\n url = {https://proceedings.iclr.cc/paper_files/paper/2025/file/7d03c6bf9f07acb4038eea96c63db52d-Paper-Conference.pdf},\n volume = {2025},\n year = {2025}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{10504634,\n author={Liu, Xinzhu and Guo, Di and Zhang, Xinyu and Liu, Huaping},\n journal={IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters}, \n title={Heterogeneous Embodied Multi-Agent Collaboration}, \n year={2024},\n volume={9},\n number={6},\n pages={5377-5384},\n keywords={Task analysis;Collaboration;Navigation;Visualization;Planning;Cognition;Benchmark testing;Heterogeneous collaboration;multi-agent collaboration;multi-agent tidying-up task},\n doi={10.1109/LRA.2024.3390588}}\n\n@inproceedings{ICLR2024_54b8b4e0,\n author = {Zhang, Hongxin and Du, Weihua and Shan, Jiaming and Zhou, Qinhong and Du, Yilun and Tenenbaum, Joshua B and Shu, Tianmin and Gan, Chuang},\n booktitle = {International Conference on Learning Representations},\n editor = {B. Kim and Y. Yue and S. Chaudhuri and K. Fragkiadaki and M. Khan and Y. Sun},\n pages = {19373--19401},\n title = {Building Cooperative Embodied Agents Modularly with Large Language Models},\n url = {https://proceedings.iclr.cc/paper_files/paper/2024/file/54b8b4e0b4ba4aad112e84f32e3b5dbb-Paper-Conference.pdf},\n volume = {2024},\n year = {2024}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Shridhar_2020_CVPR,\nauthor = {Shridhar, Mohit and Thomason, Jesse and Gordon, Daniel and Bisk, Yonatan and Han, Winson and Mottaghi, Roozbeh and Zettlemoyer, Luke and Fox, Dieter},\ntitle = {ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Tasks},\nbooktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\nmonth = {June},\nyear = {2020}\n}\n\n@article{Feng2026,\n author = {Feng, Zhaohan and Xue, Ruiqi and Yuan, Lei and Yu, Yang and Ding, Ning and Liu, Meiqin and Gao, Bingzhao and Sun, Jian and Zheng, Xinhu and Wang, Gang},\n title = {Multi-agent embodied AI: advances and future directions},\n journal = {Science China Information Sciences},\n year = {2026},\n volume = {69},\n number = {5},\n pages = {151202},\n doi = {10.1007/s11432-025-4820-4},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-025-4820-4},\n issn = {1869-1919}\n}\n\n@misc{bai2025qwen3vltechnicalreport,\n title={Qwen3-VL Technical Report}, \n author={Shuai Bai and Yuxuan Cai and Ruizhe Chen and Keqin Chen and Xionghui Chen and Zesen Cheng and Lianghao Deng and Wei Ding and Chang Gao and Chunjiang Ge and Wenbin Ge and Zhifang Guo and Qidong Huang and Jie Huang and Fei Huang and Binyuan Hui and Shutong Jiang and Zhaohai Li and Mingsheng Li and Mei Li and Kaixin Li and Zicheng Lin and Junyang Lin and Xuejing Liu and Jiawei Liu and Chenglong Liu and Yang Liu and Dayiheng Liu and Shixuan Liu and Dunjie Lu and Ruilin Luo and Chenxu Lv and Rui Men and Lingchen Meng and Xuancheng Ren and Xingzhang Ren and Sibo Song and Yuchong Sun and Jun Tang and Jianhong Tu and Jianqiang Wan and Peng Wang and Pengfei Wang and Qiuyue Wang and Yuxuan Wang and Tianbao Xie and Yiheng Xu and Haiyang Xu and Jin Xu and Zhibo Yang and Mingkun Yang and Jianxin Yang and An Yang and Bowen Yu and Fei Zhang and Hang Zhang and Xi Zhang and Bo Zheng and Humen Zhong and Jingren Zhou and Fan Zhou and Jing Zhou and Yuanzhi Zhu and Ke Zhu},\n year={2025},\n eprint={2511.21631},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21631}, \n}\n\n@misc{qwen3.5,\n title = {{Qwen3.5}: Towards Native Multimodal Agents},\n author = {{Qwen Team}},\n month = {February},\n year = {2026},\n url = {https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.5}\n}\n\n@misc{googledeepmind2026gemma4modelcard,\n title = {Gemma 4 Model Card},\n author = {{Google DeepMind}},\n year = {2026},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://ai.google.dev/gemma/docs/core/model_card_4}},\n note = {Accessed: 2026-05-26}\n}\n\n@misc{wang2025internvl35advancingopensourcemultimodal,\n title={InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency}, \n author={Weiyun Wang and Zhangwei Gao and Lixin Gu and Hengjun Pu and Long Cui and Xingguang Wei and Zhaoyang Liu and Linglin Jing and Shenglong Ye and Jie Shao and Zhaokai Wang and Zhe Chen and Hongjie Zhang and Ganlin Yang and Haomin Wang and Qi Wei and Jinhui Yin and Wenhao Li and Erfei Cui and Guanzhou Chen and Zichen Ding and Changyao Tian and Zhenyu Wu and Jingjing Xie and Zehao Li and Bowen Yang and Yuchen Duan and Xuehui Wang and Zhi Hou and Haoran Hao and Tianyi Zhang and Songze Li and Xiangyu Zhao and Haodong Duan and Nianchen Deng and Bin Fu and Yinan He and Yi Wang and Conghui He and Botian Shi and Junjun He and Yingtong Xiong and Han Lv and Lijun Wu and Wenqi Shao and Kaipeng Zhang and Huipeng Deng and Biqing Qi and Jiaye Ge and Qipeng Guo and Wenwei Zhang and Songyang Zhang and Maosong Cao and Junyao Lin and Kexian Tang and Jianfei Gao and Haian Huang and Yuzhe Gu and Chengqi Lyu and Huanze Tang and Rui Wang and Haijun Lv and Wanli Ouyang and Limin Wang and Min Dou and Xizhou Zhu and Tong Lu and Dahua Lin and Jifeng Dai and Weijie Su and Bowen Zhou and Kai Chen and Yu Qiao and Wenhai Wang and Gen Luo},\n year={2025},\n eprint={2508.18265},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18265}, \n}\n\n@misc{meta2025llama4modelcard,\n title = {Llama 4: Model Cards and Prompt Formats},\n author = {{Meta AI}},\n year = {2025},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://www.llama.com/docs/model-cards-and-prompt-formats/llama4/}},\n note = {Accessed: 2026-05-26}\n}\n\n@misc{vteam2025glm45vglm41vthinkingversatilemultimodal,\n title={GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learning}, \n author={V Team and Wenyi Hong and Wenmeng Yu and Xiaotao Gu and Guo Wang and Guobing Gan and Haomiao Tang and Jiale Cheng and Ji Qi and Junhui Ji and Lihang Pan and Shuaiqi Duan and Weihan Wang and Yan Wang and Yean Cheng and Zehai He and Zhe Su and Zhen Yang and Ziyang Pan and Aohan Zeng and Baoxu Wang and Bin Chen and Boyan Shi and Changyu Pang and Chenhui Zhang and Da Yin and Fan Yang and Guoqing Chen and Jiazheng Xu and Jiale Zhu and Jiali Chen and Jing Chen and Jinhao Chen and Jinghao Lin and Jinjiang Wang and Junjie Chen and Leqi Lei and Letian Gong and Leyi Pan and Mingdao Liu and Mingde Xu and Mingzhi Zhang and Qinkai Zheng and Sheng Yang and Shi Zhong and Shiyu Huang and Shuyuan Zhao and Siyan Xue and Shangqin Tu and Shengbiao Meng and Tianshu Zhang and Tianwei Luo and Tianxiang Hao and Tianyu Tong and Wenkai Li and Wei Jia and Xiao Liu and Xiaohan Zhang and Xin Lyu and Xinyue Fan and Xuancheng Huang and Yanling Wang and Yadong Xue and Yanfeng Wang and Yanzi Wang and Yifan An and Yifan Du and Yiming Shi and Yiheng Huang and Yilin Niu and Yuan Wang and Yuanchang Yue and Yuchen Li and Yutao Zhang and Yuting Wang and Yu Wang and Yuxuan Zhang and Zhao Xue and Zhenyu Hou and Zhengxiao Du and Zihan Wang and Peng Zhang and Debing Liu and Bin Xu and Juanzi Li and Minlie Huang and Yuxiao Dong and Jie Tang},\n year={2025},\n eprint={2507.01006},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01006}, \n}\n\n@misc{openai2025gpt5mini,\n title = {GPT-5 mini Model},\n author = {{OpenAI}},\n year = {2025},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-5-mini}},\n note = {Accessed: 2026-05-26}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{NEURIPS2023_4ec43957,\n author = {Mu, Yao and Zhang, Qinglong and Hu, Mengkang and Wang, Wenhai and Ding, Mingyu and Jin, Jun and Wang, Bin and Dai, Jifeng and Qiao, Yu and Luo, Ping},\n booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n editor = {A. Oh and T. Naumann and A. Globerson and K. Saenko and M. Hardt and S. Levine},\n pages = {25081--25094},\n publisher = {Curran Associates, Inc.},\n title = {EmbodiedGPT: Vision-Language Pre-Training via Embodied Chain of Thought},\n url = {https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/file/4ec43957eda1126ad4887995d05fae3b-Paper-Conference.pdf},\n volume = {36},\n year = {2023}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Szot_2025_CVPR,\n author = {Szot, Andrew and Mazoure, Bogdan and Attia, Omar and Timofeev, Aleksei and Agrawal, Harsh and Hjelm, Devon and Gan, Zhe and Kira, Zsolt and Toshev, Alexander},\n title = {From Multimodal LLMs to Generalist Embodied Agents: Methods and Lessons},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2025},\n pages = {10644-10655}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{kwon2023efficient,\n title={Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention},\n author={Woosuk Kwon and Zhuohan Li and Siyuan Zhuang and Ying Sheng and Lianmin Zheng and Cody Hao Yu and Joseph E. Gonzalez and Hao Zhang and Ion Stoica},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 29th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{10.1007/978-3-030-58558-7_28,\nauthor=\"Jain, Unnat\nand Weihs, Luca\nand Kolve, Eric\nand Farhadi, Ali\nand Lazebnik, Svetlana\nand Kembhavi, Aniruddha\nand Schwing, Alexander\",\neditor=\"Vedaldi, Andrea\nand Bischof, Horst\nand Brox, Thomas\nand Frahm, Jan-Michael\",\ntitle=\"A Cordial Sync: Going Beyond Marginal Policies for Multi-agent Embodied Tasks\",\nbooktitle=\"Computer Vision -- ECCV 2020\",\nyear=\"2020\",\npublisher=\"Springer International Publishing\",\naddress=\"Cham\",\npages=\"471--490\",\nabstract=\"Autonomous agents must learn to collaborate. It is not scalable to develop a new centralized agent every time a task's difficulty outpaces a single agent's abilities. While multi-agent collaboration research has flourished in gridworld-like environments, relatively little work has considered visually rich domains. Addressing this, we introduce the novel task FurnMove in which agents work together to move a piece of furniture through a living room to a goal. Unlike existing tasks, FurnMove requires agents to coordinate at every timestep. We identify two challenges when training agents to complete FurnMove: existing decentralized action sampling procedures do not permit expressive joint action policies and, in tasks requiring close coordination, the number of failed actions dominates successful actions. To confront these challenges we introduce SYNC-policies (synchronize your actions coherently) and CORDIAL (coordination loss). Using SYNC-policies and CORDIAL, our agents achieve a 58{\\%} completion rate on FurnMove, an impressive absolute gain of 25 {\\%} points over competitive decentralized baselines. Our dataset, code, and pretrained models are available at https://unnat.github.io/cordial-sync.\",\nisbn=\"978-3-030-58558-7\"\n}\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{10610855,\n author={Mandi, Zhao and Jain, Shreeya and Song, Shuran},\n booktitle={2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)}, \n title={RoCo: Dialectic Multi-Robot Collaboration with Large Language Models}, \n year={2024},\n volume={},\n number={},\n pages={286-299},\n keywords={Trajectory planning;Robot kinematics;Large language models;Semantics;Collaboration;Benchmark testing;Human in the loop},\n doi={10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10610855}\n }\n\n@misc{white2025collaboratingactionactionmultiagent,\n title={Collaborating Action by Action: A Multi-agent LLM Framework for Embodied Reasoning}, \n author={Isadora White and Kolby Nottingham and Ayush Maniar and Max Robinson and Hansen Lillemark and Mehul Maheshwari and Lianhui Qin and Prithviraj Ammanabrolu},\n year={2025},\n eprint={2504.17950},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.MA},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17950}, \n}\n\n@misc{long2024teamcraftbenchmarkmultimodalmultiagent,\n title={TeamCraft: A Benchmark for Multi-Modal Multi-Agent Systems in Minecraft}, \n author={Qian Long and Zhi Li and Ran Gong and Ying Nian Wu and Demetri Terzopoulos and Xiaofeng Gao},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2412.05255},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.AI},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.05255}, \n}\n\n@misc{yang2026coop2definingobservingrepairing,\n title={COOP$^2$: Defining, Observing, and Repairing Cooperation in LLM Multi-Agent Systems}, \n author={Hanqing Yang and Narjes Nourzad and Shiyu Chen and Marie Siew and Jingdi Chen and Carlee Joe-Wong},\n year={2026},\n eprint={2603.00349},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.AI},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00349}, \n}\n\n@inproceedings{NEURIPS2025_ab16cc8f,\n author = {Kang, Li and Song, Xiufeng and Zhou, Heng and Qin, Yiran and Yang, Jie and Liu, Xiaohong and Torr, Philip and BAI, LEI and Yin, Zhenfei},\n booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n editor = {D. Belgrave and C. Zhang and H. Lin and R. Pascanu and P. Koniusz and M. Ghassemi and N. Chen},\n pages = {},\n publisher = {Curran Associates, Inc.},\n title = {VIKI‑R: Coordinating Embodied Multi-Agent Cooperation via Reinforcement Learning},\n url = {https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2025/file/ab16cc8f472cf94b282dbff7b99f5f8e-Paper-Datasets_and_Benchmarks_Track.pdf},\n volume = {38},\n year = {2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{NEURIPS2019_f5b1b89d,\n author = {Carroll, Micah and Shah, Rohin and Ho, Mark and Griffiths, Tom and Seshia, Sanjit and Abbeel, Pieter and Dragan, Anca},\n booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n editor = {H. Wallach and H. Larochelle and A. Beygelzimer and F. d\\textquotesingle Alch\\'{e}-Buc and E. Fox and R. Garnett},\n pages = {},\n publisher = {Curran Associates, Inc.},\n title = {On the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordination},\n url = {https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2019/file/f5b1b89d98b7286673128a5fb112cb9a-Paper.pdf},\n volume = {32},\n year = {2019}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{agashe-etal-2025-llm,\n title = \"{LLM}-Coordination: Evaluating and Analyzing Multi-agent Coordination Abilities in Large Language Models\",\n author = \"Agashe, Saaket and\n Fan, Yue and\n Reyna, Anthony and\n Wang, Xin Eric\",\n editor = \"Chiruzzo, Luis and\n Ritter, Alan and\n Wang, Lu\",\n booktitle = \"Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2025\",\n month = apr,\n year = \"2025\",\n address = \"Albuquerque, New Mexico\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computational Linguistics\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-naacl.448/\",\n doi = \"10.18653/v1/2025.findings-naacl.448\",\n pages = \"8053--8072\",\n ISBN = \"979-8-89176-195-7\",\n abstract = \"Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated emergent common-sense reasoning and Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities, making them promising candidates for developing coordination agents. This study introduces the LLM-Coordination Benchmark, a novel benchmark for analyzing LLMs in the context of Pure Coordination Settings, where agents must cooperate to maximize gains. Our benchmark evaluates LLMs through two distinct tasks. The first is Agentic Coordination, where LLMs act as proactive participants in four pure coordination games. The second is Coordination Question Answering (CoordQA), which tests LLMs on 198 multiple-choice questions across these games to evaluate three key abilities: Environment Comprehension, ToM Reasoning, and Joint Planning. Results from Agentic Coordination experiments reveal that LLM-Agents excel in multi-agent coordination settings where decision-making primarily relies on environmental variables but face challenges in scenarios requiring active consideration of partners' beliefs and intentions. The CoordQA experiments further highlight significant room for improvement in LLMs' Theory of Mind reasoning and joint planning capabilities. Zero-Shot Coordination (ZSC) experiments in the Agentic Coordination setting demonstrate that LLM agents, unlike RL methods, exhibit robustness to unseen partners. These findings indicate the potential of LLMs as Agents in pure coordination setups and underscore areas for improvement.\"\n}\n\n@inproceedings{NEURIPS2025_6b8cb6b2,\n author = {Fan, Xianzhe and Zhou, Xuhui and Jin, Chuanyang and Nottingham, Kolby and Zhu, Hao and Sap, Maarten},\n booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n editor = {D. Belgrave and C. Zhang and H. Lin and R. Pascanu and P. Koniusz and M. Ghassemi and N. Chen},\n pages = {},\n publisher = {Curran Associates, Inc.},\n title = {SoMi-ToM: Evaluating Multi-Perspective Theory of Mind in Embodied Social Interactions},\n url = {https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2025/file/6b8cb6b291045e217c3ff3f854f2fd0f-Paper-Datasets_and_Benchmarks_Track.pdf},\n volume = {38},\n year = {2025}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{zha2026aircopbench,\n title = {AirCopBench: A Benchmark for Multi-drone Collaborative Embodied Perception and Reasoning},\n author = {Zha, Jirong and Fan, Yuxuan and Zhang, Tianyu and Chen, Geng and Chen, Yingfeng and Gao, Chen and Chen, Xinlei},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},\n volume = {40},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1507--1515},\n year = {2026},\n doi = {10.1609/aaai.v40i2.37126}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Zhang_2025_ICCV,\n author = {Zhang, Shiduo and Xu, Zhe and Liu, Peiju and Yu, Xiaopeng and Li, Yuan and Gao, Qinghui and Fei, Zhaoye and Yin, Zhangyue and Wu, Zuxuan and Jiang, Yu-Gang and Qiu, Xipeng},\n title = {VLABench: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Language-Conditioned Robotics Manipulation with Long-Horizon Reasoning Tasks},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)},\n month = {October},\n year = {2025},\n pages = {11142-11152}\n}\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091167,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31967"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31967"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Tianhen Wang"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Jie Ma, Tianhen Wang and Tianming Zhu"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"On clique-to-clique densities"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"14 pages, 1 figure"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"math.CO"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Let $k_r(G)$ denote the number of $r$-cliques in a graph $G$ and let $F_r(\\cdot)$ be the Lov\\'asz--Simonovits $r$-clique density function. For any integers $2\\le s<t$, we determine the asymptotically sharp lower bound on $k_t(G)$ in an $n$-vertex graph $G$ with a prescribed number $k_s(G)$, by showing that \\[ \\frac{k_t(G)}{n^t}\\ge F_t\\!\\left(F_s^{-1}\\!\\left(\\frac{k_s(G)}{n^s}\\right)\\right), \\] where $F_s^{-1}$ denotes the generalized inverse. This strengthens Bollob\\'as's piecewise-linear interpolation bound and, in the case $s=2$, recovers Reiher's clique density theorem via a new inductive proof."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:10:55 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:10:55 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Ma","Jie",""],["Wang","Tianhen",""],["Zhu","Tianming",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Ma\",\n \"Jie\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Wang\",\n \"Tianhen\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Zhu\",\n \"Tianming\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[a4paper,10pt]{article}\n\n\\pdfoutput=1 %for arxiv\n\n\\oddsidemargin 0pt\n\\evensidemargin 0pt\n\\marginparwidth 40pt\n\\topmargin 0pt\n\n\\tolerance=1000\n\\usepackage{geometry}\n\\geometry{a4paper, left=2cm, right=2cm, top=2cm, bottom=2cm}\n\\usepackage{empheq}\n\\usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,amssymb,amsthm,mathtools,tikz,enumitem}\n\\usepackage{caption}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{float}\n\\usepackage{subcaption}\n\\usepackage{microtype}\n\\usepackage{url,hyperref}\n\\usepackage{indentfirst}\n\\hypersetup{colorlinks, linkcolor={red}, citecolor={blue}, urlcolor={black}}\n\\usepackage{cleveref}\n\n\\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\\usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathreplacing,calc}\n\n\\allowdisplaybreaks\n\n\\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]\n\\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}\n\\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}\n\\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}\n\\newtheorem{claim}[theorem]{Claim}\n\\newtheorem{problem}[theorem]{Problem}\n\\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}\n\n\\theoremstyle{definition}\n\n\n\\crefname{theorem}{Theorem}{Theorems}\n\\Crefname{theorem}{Theorem}{Theorems}\n\\crefname{lemma}{Lemma}{Lemmas}\n\\Crefname{lemma}{Lemma}{Lemmas}\n\\crefname{corollary}{Corollary}{Corollaries}\n\\Crefname{corollary}{Corollary}{Corollaries}\n\\crefname{claim}{Claim}{Claims}\n\\Crefname{claim}{Claim}{Claims}\n\\Crefname{problem}{Problem}{Problems}\n\n\\newcommand{\\dd}{\\mathrm{d}}\n\\newcommand{\\GG}{\\mathcal{G}}\n\\newcommand{\\bA}{\\mathbf{A}}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\\title{On clique-to-clique densities}\n\\date{}\n\n\\author{\nJie Ma\\thanks{School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China.} \\(^{,}\\)\\thanks{Yau Mathematical Sciences Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.}\n\\and\nTianhen Wang\\footnotemark[1]\n\\and \nTianming Zhu\\footnotemark[1]\n}\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\\begingroup\n\\renewcommand\\thefootnote{}\n\\footnotetext{Emails:~~~\\texttt{jiema@ustc.edu.cn};~~~\\texttt{wth1115060377@mail.ustc.edu.cn};~~~\\texttt{zhutianming@mail.ustc.edu.cn}.}\n\\endgroup\n\n\\begin{abstract}\nLet \\(k_r(G)\\) denote the number of \\(r\\)-cliques in a graph \\(G\\) and let \\(F_r(\\cdot)\\) be the Lov\\'asz--Simonovits \\(r\\)-clique density function. For any integers \\(2\\le s<t\\), we determine the asymptotically sharp lower bound on \\(k_t(G)\\) in an \\(n\\)-vertex graph \\(G\\) with a prescribed number \\(k_s(G)\\), by showing that\n\\[\n\\frac{k_t(G)}{n^t}\\ge F_t\\!\\left(F_s^{-1}\\!\\left(\\frac{k_s(G)}{n^s}\\right)\\right),\n\\]\nwhere \\(F_s^{-1}\\) denotes the generalized inverse.\nThis strengthens Bollob\\'as's piecewise-linear interpolation bound and, in the case \\(s=2\\), recovers Reiher's clique density theorem via a new inductive proof.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\n\n\\section{Introduction}\\label{SEC:Intro}\n\\noindent \nFor an integer \\(r \\ge 2\\) and a graph \\(G\\), let \\(k_r(G)\\) denote the number of copies of the \\(r\\)-clique \\(K_r\\) in \\(G\\). In this paper, we investigate extremal problems concerning the minimization of the \\(r\\)-clique density \\(p_r(G) \\coloneqq k_r(G) / |V(G)|^r\\) over graphs \\(G\\) with prescribed density conditions.\n\nA cornerstone of extremal graph theory is Tur\\'an's theorem~\\cite{turan1941extremal}, which states that for any integers \\(n\\ge r>2\\), the maximum number \\(k_2(G)\\) of edges among all \\(n\\)-vertex \\(K_r\\)-free graphs \\(G\\) (i.e., containing no copy of \\(K_r\\)) is attained by the Tur\\'an graph \\(T_{r-1}(n)\\), the balanced complete \\((r-1)\\)-partite graph on \\(n\\) vertices. Generalizations of this classical result have played a central role in the development of extremal graph theory. In particular, Zykov~\\cite{zykov1949linear} and, independently, Erd\\H{o}s~\\cite{erdos1962number} proved that for any integers \\(n\\ge r>s\\ge2\\), the maximum number \\(k_s(G)\\) among all \\(n\\)-vertex \\(K_r\\)-free graphs \\(G\\) is likewise attained by \\(T_{r-1}(n)\\). This result initiated the study of generalized Tur\\'an numbers (see, e.g., \\cite{alon2016}).\nThese theorems imply that if \\(k_2(G)>k_2(T_{r-1}(n))\\), or more generally if \\(k_s(G)>k_s(T_{r-1}(n))\\), then \\(G\\) necessarily contains a copy of \\(K_r\\). \nThis naturally leads to the corresponding supersaturation problem: given the number of copies of \\(K_s\\) in a graph \\(G\\), what is the minimum possible number of copies of \\(K_r\\)?\n\n\nWe refer to this as the \\(K_s\\to K_r\\) problem. It has been studied extensively in the literature, with particular emphasis on the case \\(s=2\\).\nFor integers \\(p, r\\ge 2\\), we define the \\emph{critical point}\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:theta-intro}\n \\theta_{p,r}\\coloneqq \\frac{\\binom{p+1}{r}}{(p+1)^r}\n =\\lim_{n\\to\\infty}p_r\\big(T_{p+1}(n)\\big),\n\\end{equation}\nwhich is the limiting \\(r\\)-clique density of the Tur\\'an graphs \\(T_{p+1}(n)\\).\nFollowing earlier results on triangles and \\(K_4\\) in~\\cite{goodman1959sets,moon1962problem,nordhaus1963triangles},\nKhad\\v{z}iivanov and Nikiforov~\\cite{Khadzhiivanov1978} proved that for any integer $r\\ge 2$ and any graph \\(G\\) with edge-density \\(\\gamma\\), if \\(\\gamma\\ge \\frac{r-2}{2(r-1)},\\)\nthen the \\(r\\)-clique density of \\(G\\) satisfies\n\\(p_r(G)\\ge \\frac{1}{r!}\\prod_{j=2}^r \\bigl(2(j-1)\\gamma-(j-2)\\bigr).\\)\nAt each critical point \\(\\gamma=\\theta_{p,2}\\) for \\(p\\ge r-2\\), this bound becomes \\(p_r(G)\\ge \\theta_{p,r}\\) and is attained asymptotically by the corresponding Tur\\'an graphs.\nIt is worth noting that the right-hand side is a convex function of \\(\\gamma\\) on \\([\\frac{r-2}{2(r-1)},1/2)\\).\n\nIn~\\cite{bollobas1976complete}, Bollob\\'as used an elegant optimization argument to obtain the following far-reaching strengthening. \nFor any integers $r>s\\ge 2$ and any graph \\(G\\) with \\(p_s(G)=\\gamma\\), \nthe \\(r\\)-clique density of \\(G\\) satisfies \\(p_r(G)\\geq L_{s,r}(\\gamma)\\), where \\(L_{s,r}(\\gamma)\\colon [0,1/s!)\\to[0,1/r!)\\) denotes the unique piecewise-linear function satisfying\n\\(L_{s,r}(0)=0\\) and \\(L_{s,r}(\\theta_{p,s})=\\theta_{p,r}\\)\nfor every integer \\(p\\ge r-2\\).\nEvidently, this bound is optimal whenever \\(\\gamma=\\theta_{p,s}\\) for integers \\(p\\ge r-2\\), and in the case \\(s=2\\), it improves the Khad\\v{z}iivanov--Nikiforov bound at every non-critical point.\n\nIn their seminal work~\\cite{lovasz1983number}, Lov\\'asz and Simonovits formulated the celebrated clique density conjecture for the \\(K_2\\to K_r\\) problem. It asserts that, for every edge density \\(\\gamma\\), the minimum possible \\(r\\)-clique density is asymptotically attained by a complete multipartite graph in which all but at most one vertex class have the same size, while the remaining class may be smaller.\nMore precisely, for each \\(\\gamma\\in(0,1/2)\\), let \\(p\\in\\mathbb{N}_{\\ge1}\\) and \\(\\alpha\\in[0,1/p)\\) be the unique parameters satisfying\n\\(\\gamma=\\frac{p}{2(p+1)}(1-\\alpha^2)\\),\nand let \\(K_{\\gamma,n}\\) denote the \\(n\\)-vertex complete \\((p+1)\\)-partite graph with \\(p\\) vertex classes of size\n\\(\\frac{(1+\\alpha)n}{p+1}\\) and one vertex class of size \\(\\frac{(1-p\\alpha)n}{p+1}\\).\nFor \\(\\gamma=0\\), let \\(K_{0,n}\\) be the empty graph on \\(n\\) vertices. Define\n\\(F_r(\\gamma)\\coloneqq\\lim_{n\\to\\infty}p_r(K_{\\gamma,n})\\) for \\(\\gamma\\in[0,1/2)\\).\nThe clique density conjecture of Lov\\'asz--Simonovits~\\cite{lovasz1983number} then states that for every \\(r\\ge 3\\) and every graph \\(G\\), \\(p_r(G)\\ge F_r\\big(p_2(G)\\big)\\).\n\n\n\nBefore discussing subsequent developments, we pause to examine the function \\(F_r\\colon [0,1/2)\\to[0,1/r!)\\).\nClearly, \\(F_2(\\gamma)=\\gamma\\). Moreover, for every \\(r\\ge3\\), \\(F_r(0)=0\\), and a direct calculation yields\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:F-def}\nF_r(\\gamma)\n=\\frac{\\binom{p+1}{r}}{(p+1)^r}\n(1+\\alpha)^{r-1}\\bigl(1-(r-1)\\alpha\\bigr)\n\\quad \\mbox{for} \\quad \\gamma\\in(0,1/2).\n\\end{equation}\nThe function \\(F_r\\) vanishes identically on \\([0,\\frac{r-2}{2(r-1)}]\\),\\footnote{Indeed, if \\(p\\le r-2\\), then \\(\\binom{p+1}{r}=0\\), and hence \\(F_r(\\gamma)=0\\).} is continuous and strictly increasing on \\([\\frac{r-2}{2(r-1)},1/2)\\), and is piecewise concave on each interval between consecutive critical points \\(\\theta_{p,2}\\) and \\(\\theta_{p+1,2}\\), where \\(p\\ge r-2\\); see Figure~\\ref{fig:Curve} (with \\(s=2\\)).\nFinally, we define the inverse function\n\\(F_r^{-1}\\colon [0,1/r!)\\to[0,1/2)\\)\nby setting\n\\(F_r^{-1}(0)\\coloneqq\\frac{r-2}{2(r-1)}\\),\nand, for \\(y\\in(0,1/r!)\\), letting \\(F_r^{-1}(y)\\) denote the inverse of \\(F_r\\) on its strictly increasing part.\n\n\nRegarded as one of the central problems in extremal graph theory, the clique density conjecture has received considerable attention since its formulation.\nLov\\'asz and Simonovits~\\cite{lovasz1983number} proved it in a small right neighborhood of every critical point: for every fixed integer \\(r\\ge3\\) and every integer \\(p\\ge r-2\\), there exists \\(\\varepsilon_p>0\\) such that the conjectured lower bound holds whenever\n\\(\\theta_{p,2}\\le p_2(G)\\le\\theta_{p,2}+\\varepsilon_p\\). \nThe first non-trivial interval \\(1/4\\le p_2(G)\\le 1/3\\)\nfor the case \\(r=3\\) was established by Fisher~\\cite{fisher1989lower} and later revisited by Razborov~\\cite{razborov2007flag} as one of the first applications of the flag algebra method.\nShortly thereafter, Razborov~\\cite{razborov2008minimal} completely resolved the case \\(r=3\\), again using the flag algebra method.\nNikiforov~\\cite{nikiforov2011number} subsequently introduced a weighted graph analytic approach, which yielded a new proof for the case \\(r=3\\) and established the case \\(r=4\\). Finally, in a major breakthrough, Reiher~\\cite{reiher2016clique} built on this weighted graph framework to prove the clique density conjecture for every \\(r\\ge3\\).\n\n\\begin{theorem}[Reiher~\\cite{reiher2016clique}, The clique density theorem]\\label{THM:Reiher}\nLet \\(r\\ge 3\\) be an integer. Then for every graph \\(G\\),\n\\[\n p_r(G)\\ge F_r(p_2(G)).\n\\]\n\\end{theorem}\n\nIn this paper, we determine the asymptotically sharp lower bound on \\(k_t(G)\\) for graphs \\(G\\) with prescribed \\(k_s(G)\\), thereby resolving the general \\(K_s\\to K_t\\) problem for all integers \\(t>s\\ge2\\). Our main result is as follows.\n\n\\begin{theorem}\\label{THM:ordinary-main}\nLet \\(t>s\\ge 2\\) be integers. Then for every graph \\(G\\),\n\\[\n p_t(G)\\ge F_t\\bigl(F_s^{-1}(p_s(G))\\bigr).\n\\]\n\\end{theorem}\n\nThis bound is sharp at every \\(s\\)-clique density, as witnessed by the complete multipartite graph \\(K_{\\gamma,n}\\) introduced above. For integers \\(t>s\\ge2\\), the composition \\(F_t\\circ F_s^{-1}\\colon [0,1/s!)\\to[0,1/t!)\\) is piecewise concave on each interval between consecutive critical points \\(\\theta_{p,s}\\) and \\(\\theta_{p+1,s}\\), where \\(p\\ge t-2\\); see Figure~\\ref{fig:Curve}. As a consequence, it improves Bollob\\'as's piecewise-linear interpolation bound~\\cite{bollobas1976complete} at every non-critical point. Theorem~\\ref{THM:ordinary-main} also yields the aforementioned theorem of Erd\\H{o}s--Zykov on generalized Tur\\'an numbers. In the case \\(s=2\\), it recovers Reiher's clique density theorem (Theorem~\\ref{THM:Reiher}). Our proof is based on a new inductive argument that is conceptually simple; see Section~\\ref{SEC:Overview} for an overview.\n\nA direct consequence of Theorem~\\ref{THM:ordinary-main} is a hierarchy among all clique densities for every graph. Note that for every integer \\(r \\ge 2\\), the inverse function \\(F_r^{-1}\\) is strictly increasing, and hence preserves the ordering of clique-density parameters. Also note that \\(F_2(\\gamma)=\\gamma\\).\n\n\\begin{corollary}\\label{Coro:density}\n For every graph \\(G\\), it holds that\n \\[\n p_2(G)=F_2^{-1}\\big(p_2(G)\\big) \\le F_3^{-1}\\big(p_3(G)\\big)\\le F_4^{-1}\\big(p_4(G)\\big) \\le \\cdots \\le F_r^{-1}\\big(p_r(G)\\big) \\le F_{r+1}^{-1}\\big(p_{r+1}(G)\\big)\\le \\cdots.\n \\]\n Moreover, each inequality is sharp.\n\\end{corollary}\n\n\n \\begin{figure}[htbp]\n \\begin{minipage}{0.49\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\begin{tikzpicture}[\n xscale=0.64, yscale=0.7,\n >=stealth,\n point/.style={circle,draw=black, fill=white,inner sep=1.5pt},\n proj x/.style={densely dotted, gray, thin},\n proj y/.style={densely dotted, gray, thin},\n label x/.style={font=\\footnotesize, below=2pt},\n label y/.style={font=\\footnotesize, left=2pt},\n ]\n \\draw[->, thick] (1.1,0) -- (11.0,0)\n node[right] {\\(p_3\\)};\n \\draw[->, thick] (1.1,0) -- (1.1,5.0)\n node[above] {\\(p_4\\)};\n\n \\node[below left] at (1.1,0) {\\(0\\)};\n\n \\coordinate (P0) at (2.85, 0); \n \\coordinate (P1) at (4.500, 0.563); \n \\coordinate (P2) at (5.760, 1.152); \n \\coordinate (P3) at (6.667, 1.667); \n \\coordinate (P4) at (7.347, 2.099); \n \\coordinate (P5) at (7.785, 2.401); \n \\coordinate (P6) at (8.287, 2.765); \n \\coordinate (PE) at (10.000, 4.500); \n \\draw[thick, red] (1.1,0) -- (P0);\n\n \\draw[thick, red]\n (P0) .. controls (3.5, 0.40) and (3.8, 0.52) .. (P1);\n\n \\draw[thick, red]\n (P1) .. controls (4.95, 0.95) and (5.2, 1.07) .. (P2);\n\n \\draw[thick, red]\n (P2) .. controls (6.1, 1.52) and (6.3, 1.62) .. (P3);\n\n \\draw[thick, red]\n (P3) .. controls (6.9, 1.93) and (7.0, 2.0) .. (P4);\n\n \\draw[thick, red]\n (P4) .. controls (7.5, 2.30) and (7.6, 2.36) .. (P5);\n\n \\draw[thick, red]\n (P5) .. controls (7.9, 2.50) and (8.0, 2.7) .. (P6);\n\n \\draw[thick, blue] (P0) -- (P1);\n \\draw[thick, blue] (P1) -- (P2);\n \\draw[thick, blue] (P2) -- (P3);\n \\draw[thick, blue] (P3) -- (P4);\n \\draw[thick, blue] (P4) -- (P5);\n \\draw[thick, blue] (P5) -- (P6);\n\n \\draw[thick, gray, dotted] (P6) to[out=36, in=-125] (PE);\n\n \\draw[proj x] (P0) -- (P0 |- 0,0)\n node[label x] {\\(\\frac{1}{27}\\)};\n\n \\draw[proj x] (P1) -- (P1 |- 0,0)\n node[label x] {\\(\\frac{1}{16}\\)};\n \\draw[proj y] (P1) -- (P1 -| 1.1,0)\n node[label y] {\\(1/256\\)};\n\n \\draw[proj x] (P2) -- (P2 |- 0,0)\n node[label x] {\\(\\frac{2}{25}\\)};\n \\draw[proj y] (P2) -- (P2 -| 1.1,0)\n node[label y] {\\(1/125\\)};\n\n \\draw[proj x] (P3) -- (P3 |- 0,0)\n node[label x] {\\(\\frac{10}{108}\\)};\n \\draw[proj y] (P3) -- (P3 -| 1.1,0)\n node[label y] {\\(15/1296\\)};\n\n \\draw[proj x] (P4) -- (P4 |- 0,0)\n node[label x] {\\(\\frac{35}{343}\\)};\n \\draw[proj y] (P4) -- (P4 -| 1.1,0)\n node[label y] {\\(35/2401\\)};\n\n \\draw[proj x] (PE) -- (PE |- 0,0)\n node[label x] {\\(\\frac{1}{6}\\)};\n \\draw[proj y] (PE) -- (PE -| 1.1,0)\n node[label y] {\\(1/24\\)};\n\n \\foreach \\p in {P0,P1,P2,P3,P4,P5,P6,PE} {\n \\node[point] at (\\p) {};\n }\n\n \\end{tikzpicture}\n \\end{minipage}\n \\begin{minipage}{0.49\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\begin{tikzpicture}[\n xscale=0.64, yscale=0.7,\n >=stealth,\n point/.style={circle,draw=black, fill=white,inner sep=1.5pt},\n proj x/.style={densely dotted, gray, thin},\n proj y/.style={densely dotted, gray, thin},\n label x/.style={font=\\footnotesize, below=2pt},\n label y/.style={font=\\footnotesize, left=2pt},\n ]\n\n \\draw[->, thick] (1.1,0) -- (11.0,0)\n node[right] {\\(p_s\\)};\n \\draw[->, thick] (1.1,0) -- (1.1,5.0)\n node[above] {\\(p_t\\)};\n\n \\node[below left] at (1.1,0) {\\(0\\)};\n\n \\coordinate (P0) at (2.85, 0); \n \\coordinate (P1) at (4.500, 0.563); \n \\coordinate (P2) at (5.760, 1.152); \n \\coordinate (P3) at (6.667, 1.667); \n \\coordinate (P4) at (7.347, 2.099);\n \\coordinate (P5) at (7.785, 2.401); \n \\coordinate (P6) at (8.287, 2.765); \n \\coordinate (PE) at (10.000, 4.500); \n\n \\draw[thick, red] (1.1,0) -- (P0);\n\n \\draw[thick, red]\n (P0) .. controls (3.5, 0.40) and (3.8, 0.52) .. (P1);\n\n \\draw[thick, red]\n (P1) .. controls (4.95, 0.95) and (5.2, 1.07) .. (P2);\n\n \\draw[thick, red]\n (P2) .. controls (6.1, 1.52) and (6.3, 1.62) .. (P3);\n\n \\draw[thick, red]\n (P3) .. controls (6.9, 1.93) and (7.0, 2.0) .. (P4);\n\n \\draw[thick, red]\n (P4) .. controls (7.5, 2.30) and (7.6, 2.36) .. (P5);\n\n \\draw[thick, red]\n (P5) .. controls (7.9, 2.50) and (8.0, 2.7) .. (P6);\n\n \\draw[thick, gray, dotted] (P6) to[out=36, in=-125] (PE);\n\n \\draw[proj x] (P0) -- (P0 |- 0,0)\n node[label x] {\\(\\theta_{t-2,s}\\)};\n\n \\draw[proj x] (P1) -- (P1 |- 0,0)\n node[label x] {\\(\\theta_{t-1,s}\\)};\n \\draw[proj y] (P1) -- (P1 -| 1.1,0)\n node[label y] {\\(\\theta_{t-1,t}\\)};\n\n \\draw[proj x] (P2) -- (P2 |- 0,0)\n node[label x] {\\(\\theta_{t,s}\\ \\)};\n \\draw[proj y] (P2) -- (P2 -| 1.1,0)\n node[label y] {\\(\\theta_{t,t}\\)};\n\n \\draw[proj x] (P3) -- (P3 |- 0,0)\n node[label x] {\\(\\ \\theta_{t+1,s}\\)};\n \\draw[proj y] (P3) -- (P3 -| 1.1,0)\n node[label y] {\\(\\theta_{t+1,t}\\)};\n\n \\draw[proj x] (PE) -- (PE |- 0,0)\n node[label x] {\\(\\frac{1}{s!}\\)};\n \\draw[proj y] (PE) -- (PE -| 1.1,0)\n node[label y] {\\(\\frac{1}{t!}\\)};\n\n \\foreach \\p in {P0,P1,P2,P3,P4,P5,P6,PE} {\n \\node[point] at (\\p) {};\n }\n\n \\end{tikzpicture}\n \\end{minipage}\n \\caption{}\n \\caption*{%\n\\textbf{Left:} The red curve shows the bound of Theorem~\\ref{THM:ordinary-main} for \\((s,t)=(3,4)\\), while the blue curve shows Bollob\\'as's corresponding piecewise-linear interpolation bound. \n\\textbf{Right:} A schematic illustration of the curve given by Theorem~\\ref{THM:ordinary-main} for general \\(t>s\\ge 2\\), where the quantities \\(\\theta_{p,r}\\) are defined in~\\eqref{eq:theta-intro}.\nIn both figures, the dotted extensions indicate that infinitely many further pieces accumulate at the point \\((1/s!,\\,1/t!)\\).\n}\n\\label{fig:Curve}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\nThe rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section~\\ref{SEC:WeightedGraphs}, we introduce weighted graphs and reduce the proof of Theorem~\\ref{THM:ordinary-main} to the clique lifting theorem, Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting}. In Section~\\ref{SEC:Overview}, we outline the proof of Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting}. Section~\\ref{SEC:Analytic} collects several auxiliary lemmas, including one on analytic function extension. In Section~\\ref{SEC:MainProof}, we prove Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting} by induction on \\(r\\). In Section~\\ref{SEC:concluding}, we establish a stability result for Theorem~\\ref{THM:ordinary-main} and discuss a related open problem for future work.\nThroughout the paper, we write \\([n]=\\{1,2,\\dots,n\\}\\) for a positive integer \\(n\\), and for a set \\(X\\) we denote by \\(\\binom{X}{r}\\) the family of all \\(r\\)-element subsets of \\(X\\).\n\n\n\\section{Weighted Graphs and Clique Lifting}\\label{SEC:WeightedGraphs}\n\\noindent\nIn this section, we formulate our main result in the setting of weighted graphs and reduce the proof of Theorem~\\ref{THM:ordinary-main} to a weighted graph statement (Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting}).\nA {\\it weighted graph} \\(\\GG(\\vec{\\mathbf{x}}, \\bA)\\) of order \\(n\\) consists of a vector \\(\\vec{\\mathbf{x}} = (x_1, x_2, \\dots, x_n)\\in \\mathbb{R}_{\\ge 0}^{n}\\) with \\(\\sum_{i=1}^n x_i = 1\\) and an \\(n \\times n\\) symmetric matrix \\(\\bA = (a_{ij})_{i,j \\in [n]}\\) such that \\(0\\le a_{ij} \\le 1\\) and \\(a_{ii} = 0\\) for all \\(i, j \\in [n]\\).\nIf \\(e=\\{i,j\\}\\in \\binom{[n]}{2}\\), we write \n\\(a_e\\) instead of \\(a_{ij}\\). \n\nFor a weighted graph \\(\\GG=\\GG(\\vec{\\mathbf{x}}, \\bA)\\) of order \\(n\\) and an integer \\(r\\ge1\\), we define the {\\it \\(r\\)-clique density} of \\(\\GG\\) to be\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:weighted-density}\n \\GG(K_r)\n \\coloneqq\n \\sum_{S\\in\\binom{[n]}{r}}\n \\prod_{e\\in \\binom{S}{2}}a_{e}\n \\prod_{i\\in S}x_i.\n\\end{equation}\nEvery \\(n\\)-vertex graph \\(G\\) can be viewed as a weighted graph \\(\\GG=\\GG(\\vec{\\mathbf{x}},\\bA)\\) of order \\(n\\), where \\(x_i=1/n\\) for each \\(i\\in[n]\\) and \\(\\bA\\) is the adjacency matrix of \\(G\\).\nUnder this correspondence, \\(\\GG(K_r)=p_r(G)\\) for all \\(r\\ge 2\\). \n\nNow we state the weighted version of \\Cref{THM:ordinary-main} as follows.\n\n\\begin{theorem}\\label{THM:Main}\nLet \\(t >s \\ge 2 \\) be integers. Then for every weighted graph \\(\\GG\\),\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:main}\n \\GG(K_t)\\ge F_t\\bigl(F_s^{-1}(\\GG(K_s))\\bigr).\n\\end{equation}\nMoreover, this bound is sharp.\n\\end{theorem}\n\nEquivalently, Theorem~\\ref{THM:Main} can be written in the following explicit form:\nfor any integers \\(t>s\\ge2\\) and every weighted graph \\(\\GG\\) with \\(\\GG(K_s)>0\\), if the integer \\(p\\ge s-1\\) and \\(\\alpha\\in[0,1/p)\\) are (uniquely) determined by\n\\[\n\\GG(K_s)=\\frac{\\binom{p+1}{s}}{(p+1)^s}(1+\\alpha)^{s-1}\\bigl(1-(s-1)\\alpha\\bigr)\n\\implies \n\\GG(K_t)\\ge\\frac{\\binom{p+1}{t}}{(p+1)^t}(1+\\alpha)^{t-1}\\bigl(1-(t-1)\\alpha\\bigr).\n\\]\n\nOur focus, however, is the following special case of Theorem~\\ref{THM:Main}, which we refer to as the \\emph{clique lifting}.\nFor each integer \\(r\\ge2\\), define\n\\(\\Phi_r \\coloneqq F_{r+1}\\circ F_r^{-1}\\)\nas the map from \\([0,1/r!)\\) to \\([0,1/(r+1)!)\\), where \\(F_r^{-1}\\) denotes the generalized inverse introduced earlier. Since both \\(F_r^{-1}\\) and \\(F_{r+1}\\) are continuous and non-decreasing, so is \\(\\Phi_r\\).\n\n\\begin{theorem}[The clique lifting]\\label{THM:clique-lifting}\nLet \\(r\\ge2\\) be an integer. Then for every weighted graph \\(\\GG\\)\n\\begin{equation}\\label{equ:clique-lifting}\n\\GG(K_{r+1})\\ge \\Phi_r\\bigl(\\GG(K_r)\\bigr).\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{theorem}\n\n\nWe remark that Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting} \\(\\implies\\) Theorem~\\ref{THM:Main} \\(\\implies\\) Theorem~\\ref{THM:ordinary-main}.\\footnote{In fact, all three theorems are equivalent. The implication\nTheorem~\\ref{THM:Main} \\(\\implies\\) Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting}\nis immediate, while\nTheorem~\\ref{THM:ordinary-main} \\(\\implies\\) Theorem~\\ref{THM:Main}\nfollows from a standard limiting argument; see~\\cite[Section~2]{reiher2016clique} for details.}\nTo prove the first implication, note that \\eqref{equ:clique-lifting} and the monotonicity of \\(F_{r+1}^{-1}\\) imply that \n\\(F_{r+1}^{-1}\\bigl(\\GG(K_{r+1})\\bigr)\\ge F_r^{-1}\\bigl(\\GG(K_r)\\bigr)\\) for every \\(r\\ge 2\\). Consequently, for all integers \\(t>s\\ge 2\\),\n\\(F_t^{-1}\\bigl(\\GG(K_t)\\bigr)\\ge F_{t-1}^{-1}\\bigl(\\GG(K_{t-1})\\bigr)\\ge\\cdots\\ge F_s^{-1}\\bigl(\\GG(K_s)\\bigr)\\),\nwhich implies \\eqref{eq:main}. \nThe second implication follows immediately from the correspondence between a graph and its associated weighted graph. \n\n\\medskip\n\nBefore proceeding, we briefly review the known results for weighted graphs. The notion of weighted graphs was introduced by Nikiforov~\\cite{nikiforov2011number}, who reformulated the clique density problem in this setting and proposed an analytic approach to its study. He proved the weighted clique density theorem for triangles and \\(K_4\\), and the general case was later established by Reiher~\\cite{reiher2016clique}, thereby resolving the Lov\\'asz--Simonovits conjecture in full.\n\n\\medskip\n\nIn the remainder of the paper, we prove Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting} by induction on \\(r\\ge 2\\). The base case \\(r=2\\) is precisely Nikiforov's theorem for triangles, which we state below. Observe that \\(\\Phi_2=F_3\\).\n\n\\begin{theorem}[Nikiforov~\\cite{nikiforov2011number}]\\label{THM:Nikiforov-weighted}\nFor every weighted graph \\(\\GG\\), it holds that \n\\(\\GG(K_3)\\ge \\Phi_2\\bigl(\\GG(K_2)\\bigr).\\)\n\\end{theorem}\n\n\\section{Proof Overview}\\label{SEC:Overview}\n\\noindent\nIn this section, we outline the proof of Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting}.\n\nWe first introduce the necessary notation, most of which follows that of Reiher~\\cite{reiher2016clique}. Let \\(\\GG=\\GG(\\vec{\\mathbf{x}},\\bA)\\) be a weighted graph of order \\(n\\). For \\(I\\subseteq[n]\\) and \\(r\\ge1\\), define {\\it the rooted \\(r\\)-clique density} of \\(\\GG\\) to be \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:local-density-def}\n \\GG_I(K_r)\n \\coloneqq\n \\sum_{S\\in \\binom{[n]\\setminus I}{r}}\n \\left(\\prod_{u\\in I,\\,v\\in S} a_{uv}\\right)\n \\left(\\prod_{e\\in \\binom{S}{2}} a_{e}\\right)\n \\prod_{v\\in S} x_v.\n\\end{equation}\nWe write \\(\\GG_i(K_r)\\) and \\(\\GG_{ij}(K_r)\\) when \\(I=\\{i\\}\\) and \\(I=\\{i,j\\}\\), respectively. \nWith this notation, it holds that\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:derivative-identities}\n \\frac{\\partial \\GG(K_r)}{\\partial x_i}=\\GG_i(K_{r-1}),\n \\quad\\text{and for \\(r\\ge 2\\)}, \\quad\n \\frac{\\partial \\GG(K_r)}{\\partial a_{ij}}=x_i x_j\\,\\GG_{ij}(K_{r-2}).\n\\end{equation}\nLet \\(\\rho_i\\coloneqq \\GG_i(K_1)\\) denote the {\\it weighted degree} of the vertex \\(i\\in [n]\\). \nIf \\(\\rho_i>0\\), we define {\\it the weighted neighborhood graph}\n\\(\\GG^{(i)}\\coloneqq \\GG^{(i)}(\\vec{\\mathbf{x}}^{(i)},\\bA^{(i)})\\) on the vertex set \\([n]\\setminus\\{i\\}\\) such that its vertex weights and edge weights satisfy\n\\[\n x^{(i)}_j\\coloneqq\\frac{a_{ij}x_j}{\\rho_i} \\quad \\mbox{and} \\quad\n a^{(i)}_{jk}\\coloneqq a_{jk}\n \\quad \\text{for all~} j,k\\in[n]\\setminus\\{i\\}.\n\\]\nSince \\( \\sum_{j\\ne i}x^{(i)}_j\n =\n \\frac{1}{\\rho_i}\\sum_{j\\ne i}a_{ij} x_j\n =\n 1,\\)\nthis defines a weighted graph. \nMoreover, for each \\(i\\in [n]\\) and \\(r\\ge 1\\),\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:neighborhood-graph}\n \\GG^{(i)}(K_r)\n =\n \\sum_{S\\in\\binom{[n]\\setminus\\{i\\}}{r}}\n \\prod_{e\\in\\binom{S}{2}}a_e\n \\prod_{j\\in S}\\frac{a_{ij} x_j}{\\rho_i}\n =\n \\frac{1}{\\rho_i^r}\n \\sum_{S\\in\\binom{[n]\\setminus\\{i\\}}{r}}\n \\prod_{j\\in S}a_{ij}\n \\prod_{e\\in\\binom{S}{2}}a_e\n \\prod_{j\\in S}x_j\n =\n \\frac{\\GG_i(K_r)}{\\rho_i^r}.\n\\end{equation}\nThis identity reveals an exact relationship between the \\(r\\)-clique density in \\(\\GG^{(i)}\\) and the quantities \\(\\GG_i(K_r)\\) and \\(\\rho_i\\), which will play an important role in the subsequent proof.\n\n\\medskip\n\nFor comparison, we briefly recall the main ideas in Reiher's proof of the clique density theorem~\\cite{reiher2016clique}. Since the full argument is technically involved, we only indicate the conceptual framework. \nReiher's proof proceeds by a double induction on the clique size \\(r\\) and on the order \\(n\\) of the weighted graph. Fix \\(r\\), and let \\(\\GG\\) be a counterexample of minimum order \\(n\\); subject to this choice, assume that\n\\(\\GG\\) maximizes the defect \\(F_r(\\GG(K_2))-\\GG(K_r)\\). \nWriting \\(\\gamma=\\GG(K_2)\\) and \\(\\lambda=F_r'(\\gamma)\\), the Lagrange multiplier condition for variations of the vertex weights gives a constant \\(\\mu\\) such that\n\\(\\mu=\\lambda \\GG_i(K_1)-\\GG_i(K_{r-1})\\) for every \\(i\\in[n]\\). Starting from this relation, Reiher used a Razborov-type double-counting argument (i.e., \\cite{razborov2008minimal}) to obtain the key estimate\n\\[\n (r-1)\\GG(K_r)+(r+1)\\GG(K_{r+1})\n \\le \\lambda\\bigl(\\GG(K_2)+3\\GG(K_3)\\bigr) -2\\GG(K_2)\\mu.\n\\]\nNext, for each \\(i\\in[n]\\), consider the weighted neighborhood graph \\(\\GG^{(i)}\\), which has order \\(n-1\\). Applying the double induction to\n\\(\\GG^{(i)}\\) gives lower bounds on both \\(\\GG^{(i)}(K_{r-1})\\) and\n\\(\\GG^{(i)}(K_r)\\). Together with the identity\n\\eqref{eq:neighborhood-graph} and a delicate analytic argument, these local\nbounds yield a second estimate controlling\n\\(3\\lambda\\GG(K_3)-(r+1)\\GG(K_{r+1})\\).\nFinally, adding the two estimates produces substantial cancellations and\nleads to a contradiction.\n\n\\medskip\n\nWhereas Reiher's theorem is an edge-to-clique result, Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting} establishes the clique lifting from the \\(K_r\\)-density to the \\(K_{r+1}\\)-density. Its proof also has a different approach from Reiher's proof~\\cite{reiher2016clique}: it uses a single induction on \\(r\\), rather than a double induction on the clique size and the order of the weighted graph.\nThe base case \\(r=2\\) is provided by Theorem~\\ref{THM:Nikiforov-weighted}. Now fix \\(r\\ge3\\) and let \\(\\GG\\) be a counterexample with minimum order \\(n\\) and, subject to this, maximizing the defect \\(\\Phi_r(\\GG(K_r))-\\GG(K_{r+1})\\). Let \\(\\GG(K_r)=F_r(\\gamma)\\). \nBy the method of Lagrange multipliers, there exists a constant \\(\\mu\\) such that \\(\\mu=\\lambda\\GG_i(K_{r-1})-\\GG_i(K_r)\\) for all \\(i\\in[n]\\), where \\(\\lambda=\\Phi_r'(x_0)\\) with \\(x_0=F_r(\\gamma)\\). Multiplying~\\eqref{eq:vertex-general} by \\(x_i\\) and summing over \\(i\\in[n]\\), we obtain \n\\[\n\\mu=r\\lambda\\GG(K_r)-(r+1)\\GG(K_{r+1}).\n\\]\nLet \\(\\mu_0\\) denote the corresponding extremal value of \\(\\mu\\), namely \\(\\mu_0\\coloneqq r\\lambda F_r(\\gamma)-(r+1)F_{r+1}(\\gamma)\\). By assumption, \\(\\GG(K_{r+1})<\\Phi_r(\\GG(K_r))=\\Phi_r(F_r(\\gamma))=F_{r+1}(\\gamma)\\)\nand thus \\(M\\coloneqq \\mu/\\mu_0>1\\). \nNow fix \\(i\\in [n]\\) and consider the weighted neighborhood graph \\(\\GG^{(i)}\\). Using \\eqref{eq:neighborhood-graph} and applying the induction hypothesis to \\(\\GG^{(i)}\\) (with \\(r-1\\)) yields\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:outline}\n\\frac{\\GG_i(K_r)}{\\rho_i^r}=\\GG^{(i)}(K_r)\\geq \\Phi_{r-1}(\\GG^{(i)}(K_{r-1}))=\\Phi_{r-1}\\left(\\frac{\\GG_i(K_{r-1})}{\\rho_i^{r-1}}\\right).\n\\end{equation}\nOn the other hand, via an analytic extension technique (Lemma~\\ref{LEM:envelope}), the condition \\(M>1\\) implies that \\(\\GG_i(K_r)\\) is too small relative to \\(\\GG_i(K_{r-1})\\). Combined with \\eqref{eq:outline}, this forces \\(\\rho_i\\) to be relatively large; see Claim~\\ref{CLAIM:local-general} for details. Summing over all \\(i\\in[n]\\) then gives a lower bound on \\(\\GG(K_2)\\), while repeated clique lifting in the reverse direction yields the upper bound \\(\\GG(K_2)\\le F_r^{-1}(\\GG(K_r))\\). A straightforward calculation shows that these two bounds are incompatible, thereby completing the proof.\n\n\n\\section{Auxiliary Lemmas}\\label{SEC:Analytic}\n\\noindent In this section we collect several auxiliary lemmas that will be used in the proof of~\\Cref{THM:clique-lifting}. \nRecall \\(\\Phi_r=F_{r+1}\\circ F_r^{-1}\\). \nNote that \\(\\Phi_r(x)>0\\) if and only if \\(x>(1/r)^r\\).\nBy \\eqref{eq:theta-intro}, we have\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:theta}\n \\theta_{p,r}=\\frac{\\binom{p+1}{r}}{(p+1)^r}=F_r\\left(\\frac{p}{2(p+1)}\\right) \\quad \\mbox{for any integers \\(r\\ge 2\\) and \\(p\\ge r-1\\)}.\n\\end{equation} \n\n\\begin{lemma}\\label{LEM:ratio}\nFor every \\(r\\ge3\\), the function\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:ratio-function}\n u\\longmapsto \\frac{\\Phi_{r-1}(u)}{u^{r/(r-1)}}\n\\end{equation}\nis identically zero on \\(\\big(0,1/(r-1)^{r-1}\\big]\\)\nand is strictly increasing on \\(\\big(1/(r-1)^{r-1},1/(r-1)!\\big)\\).\n\\end{lemma}\n\n\n\\begin{proof}\nFirst consider when \\( 0<u\\le 1/(r-1)^{r-1}\\).\nThen \\(F_{r-1}^{-1}(u)\\le (r-2)/(2(r-1))\\), and consequently\n\\(\\Phi_{r-1}(u)=F_r(F_{r-1}^{-1}(u))=0\\). Thus the function in\n\\eqref{eq:ratio-function} is indeed identically zero on this interval.\n \nFor the strictly increasing part, we decompose the interval \\(\\big(1/(r-1)^{r-1},1/(r-1)!\\big)\\) as the union of \\((\\theta_{p-1,r-1},\\theta_{p,r-1}]\\) for \\(p\\ge r-1\\) and verify the monotonicity on each subinterval.\nAssume \\(u\\in (\\theta_{p-1,r-1}, \\theta_{p,r-1}]\\) for some integer \\(p\\ge r-1\\) and let \\(\\gamma\\coloneqq F_{r-1}^{-1}(u)\\). Then \\(\\gamma\\in(\\theta_{p-1,2}, \\theta_{p,2}]\\) and \n\\(\\gamma=\\frac{p}{2(p+1)}(1-\\alpha^2)\\coloneqq \\gamma(\\alpha)\\) for some unique \\(\\alpha\\in [0,1/p\\)). \nThen \n\\[\n F_{r-1}(\\gamma)=\n \\frac{\\binom{p+1}{r-1}}{(p+1)^{r-1}}\n (1+\\alpha)^{r-2}\\bigl(1-(r-2)\\alpha\\bigr)\n \\quad \\mbox{and} \\quad \n F_{r}(\\gamma)=\n \\frac{\\binom{p+1}{r}}{(p+1)^{r}}\n (1+\\alpha)^{r-1}\\bigl(1-(r-1)\\alpha\\bigr). \n\\]\nSince \\(F_r(\\gamma)\\) is differentiable for \\(\\gamma(\\alpha)\\in (\\theta_{p-1,2},\\theta_{p,2})\\), a direct differentiation (see Appendix~\\ref{APP:derivatives} for details) yields \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:log-derivative}\n \\frac{\\dd}{\\dd\\alpha}\n\\log\\left(\\frac{F_r(\\gamma)}{F_{r-1}(\\gamma)^{r/(r-1)}}\\right)\n= -\\frac{r\\alpha}{(1+\\alpha)(1-(r-2)\\alpha)(1-(r-1)\\alpha)}<0.\n\\end{equation}\nSince \\(F_{r-1}(\\gamma)\\) is\nstrictly decreasing as a function of \\(\\alpha\\) on \\([0,1/p)\\),~\\eqref{eq:log-derivative} implies that the\nfunction in~\\eqref{eq:ratio-function} is strictly increasing as a function of\n\\(u=F_{r-1}(\\gamma)\\) on the interval \\((\\theta_{p-1,r-1}, \\theta_{p,r-1})\\). Since \\(\\Phi_{r-1}\\) is continuous, the strict monotonicity holds on the whole interval\n\\(\\big(1/(r-1)^{r-1},1/(r-1)!\\big)\\). This completes the proof.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\nNote that the function \\eqref{eq:F-def} (on its strictly increasing range) can be viewed as a multi-variable function with variables $r-1\\leq p\\in \\mathbb{N}$ and $0\\leq \\alpha \\leq 1/p$.\nAs a key step in the proof of~\\Cref{THM:clique-lifting} (i.e., in Claim~\\ref{CLAIM:local-general}), we need to extend this function to the interval $0\\leq \\alpha\\leq 1/(r-1)$. \nFor this purpose, we define the following extension: for fixed integers \\(q \\ge r\\ge 2\\),\n\\begin{equation}\\label{equ:P_r}\n P_r(q,\\beta)\\coloneqq\n \\frac{\\binom q r}{q^r}(1+\\beta)^{r-1}\n \\bigl(1-(r-1)\\beta\\bigr) \\quad \\mbox{where} \\quad 0\\le\\beta\\le 1/(r-1).\n\\end{equation} \nLet \\(q\\ge r+1\\). It is clear that the parametric curve \\((P_r(q,\\beta), P_{r+1}(q,\\beta))\\) coincides with \\(\\Phi_r\\) for \\(0\\le \\beta \\le 1/(q-1)\\). The next lemma shows that it actually remains below \\(\\Phi_r\\) for all \\(0\\le \\beta \\le 1/r\\).\n\n\\begin{lemma}\\label{LEM:envelope}\nLet \\(r\\ge 2\\) and \\(q\\ge r+1\\). For every \\(\\beta \\in[0,1/r]\\),\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:envelope}\n \\Phi_{r}(P_r(q,\\beta))\n \\ge P_{r+1}(q,\\beta).\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{lemma}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nFix \\(r\\ge 2\\).\nWe use two elementary facts. First, for \\(\\widetilde{q}\\in\\{q-1,q\\}\\) and \\(\\beta \\in[0,1/r]\\),\n\\begin{equation*}\\label{eq:Pr-log-derivative}\n \\frac{\\partial}{\\partial \\beta}\\log P_r(\\widetilde{q},\\beta)\n =-\\frac{r(r-1)\\beta}{(1+\\beta)(1-(r-1)\\beta)}\\le0, \n\\end{equation*}\nwith equality if and only if \\(\\beta=0\\).\nHence, \\(P_r(\\widetilde{q},\\cdot)\\) is strictly decreasing for \\(\\beta\\in [0,1/r]\\). Second, for fixed \\(r\\)\nand \\(\\beta\\), since the factor \\(\\binom{n}{r}/n^r=\\frac1{r!}\\prod_{\\ell=0}^{r-1}\\left(1-\\frac{\\ell}{n}\\right)\\) is strictly increasing in \\(n\\), we have \\(P_r(q-1,\\beta)< P_r(q,\\beta)\\).\n\nNow we prove the result by induction on \\(q\\). If \\(q=r+1\\), then \\(1/r=1/(q-1)\\), so~\\eqref{eq:envelope} holds with equality by the definition of \\(F_r\\) and \\(F_{r+1}\\).\nAssume now \\(q \\geq r+2\\) and that the result holds for \\(q-1\\). If\n\\(0\\le\\beta \\le1/(q-1)\\), then~\\eqref{eq:envelope} is again an equality. Hence we may assume\n\\( 1/(q-1)< \\beta \\le 1/r \\). Let \\(x_{0} \\coloneqq P_r(q-1,0)=P_r\\left(q,1/(q-1)\\right)\\). \n\nWe claim that there exists a unique \\(\\beta'\\in (0,1/r)\\) such that\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:beta-prime}\n \\beta'<\\beta \\quad \\text{and} \\quad x_1 \\coloneqq P_r(q-1,\\beta')=P_r(q,\\beta).\n\\end{equation}\nTo see it, using the above two elementary facts, we have \\(x_{0}=P_r(q,1/(q-1))>P_r(q,\\beta)\\), and further\n\\[\n P_r(q-1,1/r)<P_r(q,1/r)\\le P_r(q,\\beta)<x_{0}=P_r(q-1,0).\n\\]\nBy the intermediate value theorem, there exists \\(\\beta'\\in (0,1/r)\\) such that \\(P_r(q-1,\\beta')=P_r(q,\\beta)\\). \nMoreover, we have \\(P_r(q-1,\\beta)<P_r(q,\\beta)=P_r(q-1,\\beta')\\);\nsince \\(P_r(q-1,\\cdot)\\) is strictly decreasing, we derive \\(\\beta'<\\beta\\), as claimed.\n\nFor \\(\\widetilde{q}\\in \\{q-1,q\\}\\), let \\(Z_{\\widetilde{q}}(x)\\) denote \\(P_{r+1}(\\widetilde{q},\\beta)\\) written as a function of\n\\(x=P_r(\\widetilde{q},\\beta)\\). Then we have\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:slope}\n Z_{\\widetilde{q}}'(x)=\\frac{\\dd P_{r+1}(\\widetilde{q},\\beta)/\\dd \\beta}{\\dd P_r(\\widetilde{q},\\beta )/\\dd \\beta}\n =\\frac{\\widetilde{q}-r}{\\widetilde{q}(r-1)}(1+\\beta).\\footnote{We refer to Appendix~\\ref{APP:derivatives} for a detailed verification.}\n\\end{equation}\nRecall the definition of \\(x_0\\).\nWe first note that \\(Z_q(x_0)=P_{r+1}(q, 1/(q-1))=P_{r+1}(q-1,0)=Z_{q-1}(x_0)\\). \nFor \\(x<x_0\\), define parameters \\(\\beta_0\\) and \\(\\beta'_0\\) so that \\(P_r(q,\\beta_0)=P_r(q-1,\\beta'_0)=x\\).\nSince \\(P_r(q-1,\\beta_0)<P_r(q,\\beta_0)=P_r(q-1,\\beta'_0)\\), we have \\(\\beta_0>\\beta'_0\\). \nThen using~\\eqref{eq:slope}, we see \\(Z_q'(x)>Z_{q-1}'(x)\\ge 0\\) for $x<x_0$. By the Newton--Leibniz formula and the fact \\(Z_q(x_0)=Z_{q-1}(x_0)\\), we have \\(Z_q(x)\\le Z_{q-1}(x)\\) for every \\(x<x_{0}\\). In particular, since \\(x_{1}=P_r(q,\\beta)\\le x_{0}\\),\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:beta-beta'}\n P_{r+1}(q,\\beta)=Z_q(x_{1})\\le Z_{q-1}(x_{1})=P_{r+1}(q-1,\\beta').\n\\end{equation}\nNote that \\(q-1\\geq r+1\\). Using induction on \\(q-1\\), we complete the proof by deriving the desired inequality\n\\[\n \\Phi_{r}(P_r(q,\\beta))\n \\overset{\\eqref{eq:beta-prime}}{=}\\Phi_{r}(P_r(q-1,\\beta'))\n \\ge P_{r+1}(q-1,\\beta')\n \\overset{\\eqref{eq:beta-beta'}}{\\ge} P_{r+1}(q,\\beta). \\qedhere\n\\]\n\\end{proof}\n\nThe next lemma is a weighted graph version of a classic clique density inequality (see~\\cite{lovasz1983number}). \nFor completeness, we include a self-contained proof in Appendix~\\ref{APP:quadratic}. \n\n\\begin{lemma}\\label{LEM:quadratic-MM}\nFor every integer \\(r\\ge2\\) and every weighted graph \\(\\GG\\),\n\\[\n r^2\\GG(K_r)^2\n \\le\n \\GG(K_{r-1})\\Bigl(\\GG(K_r)+(r^2-1)\\GG(K_{r+1})\\Bigr).\n\\]\n\\end{lemma}\n\nIn the following lemma, we prove Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting} for all critical points (i.e., when \\(\\GG(K_r)=\\theta_{p,r}\\) for \\(p\\ge r\\ge 3\\)), assuming that Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting} holds for \\(r-1\\). \n\n\\begin{lemma}\\label{LEM:critical-values}\nLet \\(p\\ge r \\ge 3\\) and assume Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting} holds for \\(r-1\\). If \\(\\GG\\) is a weighted graph with \\(\\GG(K_r)=\\theta_{p,r}\\), then \\(\\GG(K_{r+1})\\ge \\theta_{p,r+1}\\).\n\\end{lemma}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nBy the assumption that Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting} holds for \\(r-1\\), we have \\(\\theta_{p,r}=\\GG(K_r)\\ge \\Phi_{r-1}(\\GG(K_{r-1})).\\)\nSince \\(\\Phi_{r-1}\\) is non-decreasing, we obtain \n\\(\\GG(K_{r-1})\\le \\Phi_{r-1}^{-1}\\left(\\theta_{p,r}\\right)=\\theta_{p,r-1}.\n\\)\nBy Lemma~\\ref{LEM:quadratic-MM}, we have\n\\[\n r^2\\GG(K_r)^2\n \\le\n \\GG(K_{r-1})\\Bigl(\\GG(K_r)+(r^2-1)\\GG(K_{r+1})\\Bigr).\n\\]\nAs \\(\\GG(K_r)=\\theta_{p,r}>0\\) and \\(\\GG(K_{r-1})\\le \\theta_{p,r-1}\\), it follows that\n\\(\nr^2\\theta_{p,r}^2\\le\\theta_{p,r-1}\\bigl(\\theta_{p,r}+(r^2-1)\\GG(K_{r+1})\\bigr).\n\\)\nTherefore,\n\\[\n \\GG(K_{r+1})\n \\ge\n \\frac{r^2\\theta_{p,r}^2/\\theta_{p,r-1}-\\theta_{p,r}}{r^2-1}\n =\n \\frac{\\binom{p+1}{r}}{(p+1)^r}\\cdot\n \\frac{p+1-r}{(p+1)(r+1)}\n =\n \\frac{\\binom{p+1}{r+1}}{(p+1)^{r+1}}\n =\\theta_{p,r+1}. \\qedhere\n\\]\n\\end{proof}\n\nIn the final lemma of this section, we gather several useful properties of a minimal counterexample to Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting}, which will be used later. \n\n\\begin{lemma}\\label{LEM:reduction}\nLet \\(r\\ge3\\) and assume that Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting} holds for \\(r-1\\). Suppose that there is a weighted graph \\(\\GG_0\\) such that \\(\\Phi_r(\\GG_0(K_r))>0\\) and \\(\\GG_0(K_{r+1})<\\Phi_r(\\GG_0(K_r))\\).\nThen there exists a weighted graph \\(\\GG=\\GG(\\vec{\\mathbf{x}}, \\bA)\\) satisfying the two inequalities above and the following properties:\n\\begin{enumerate}[label={\\(\\arabic*\\)}]\n \\item[(1).] All \\(x_i\\)'s are positive;\n \\item[(2).] \\(\\GG(K_r)=F_r(\\gamma)\\) for some $\\gamma=\\frac{p}{2(p+1)}(1-\\alpha^2)$ with $r\\le p\\in\\mathbb{N}$ and $0<\\alpha<1/p$;\n \\item[(3).] \\(\\GG\\) is a local maximizer of \\(\\Phi_r(\\GG(K_r))-\\GG(K_{r+1})\\), subject to the constraints \\(\\sum_i x_i=1\\) and \\(0\\le a_{ij}\\le 1\\).\n\\end{enumerate} \n\\end{lemma}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nFor any weighted graph \\(\\GG\\), let\n\\[\n f(\\GG)\\coloneqq\\Phi_r(\\GG(K_r))-\\GG(K_{r+1}).\n\\]\nAmong all weighted graphs \\(\\GG\\) satisfying \\(\\Phi_r(\\GG(K_r))>0\\) and \\(f(\\GG)>0\\), choose one of minimum order \\(n\\). By compactness, the continuous function \\(f\\) attains its maximum over the space of weighted graphs of order \\(n\\). Let \\(\\GG\\) be such a maximizer and clearly \\(f(\\GG)>0\\).\n\nFirst, if \\(x_i=0\\) for some \\(i\\in [n]\\), deleting the vertex \\(i\\) leaves all clique densities, and hence the value of \\(f\\), unchanged. Thus the resulting weighted graph \\(\\GG'\\) satisfies \\(\\Phi_r(\\GG'(K_r))>0\\) and \\(f(\\GG')>0\\), contradicting the minimal choice of \\(n\\). So every vertex weight of \\(\\GG\\) is positive.\n\nIf \\(\\Phi_r(\\GG(K_r))=0\\), then \\(f(\\GG)=-\\GG(K_{r+1})\\le0 \\),\ncontrary to \\(f(\\GG)>0\\).\nHence we have \\(\\Phi_r(\\GG(K_r))>0\\).\nIf \\(\\GG(K_r)=\\theta_{p,r}\\), then Lemma~\\ref{LEM:critical-values} gives\n\\[\n \\GG(K_{r+1})\\ge \\theta_{p,r+1}\n =\n \\Phi_r(\\theta_{p,r})\n =\n \\Phi_r(\\GG(K_r)),\n\\]\nand hence \\(f(\\GG)\\le 0\\), again a contradiction. So \\(\\GG(K_r)\\) cannot equal \\(\\theta_{p,r}\\) for any \\(p\\ge r\\). \nSo \\( \\gamma\\coloneqq F_r^{-1}(\\GG(K_r))\\in\n \\left(\\frac{r-1}{2r},\\frac12\\right)\n \\setminus\n \\left\\{\\frac{p}{2(p+1)}:p\\ge r\\right\\}.\\)\nEquivalently, \\(\\GG(K_r)=F_r(\\gamma)\\) with \\(\\gamma=\\frac{p}{2(p+1)}(1-\\alpha^2)\\), where \\(r\\leq p\\in \\mathbb{N}\\) and \\(0<\\alpha<1/p\\) are unique.\nTherefore, \\(\\Phi_r\\) is differentiable at \\(\\GG(K_r)\\), and the global maximizer is in particular a local maximum of \\(f\\) subject to the constraint \\(\\sum_i x_i=1\\) and \\(0\\le a_{ij}\\le 1\\). This completes the proof.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\n\\section{Proof of Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting}}\\label{SEC:MainProof}\n\\noindent In this section, we aim to prove Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting} by induction on \\(r\\). That is, \\(\\GG(K_{r+1})\\ge \\Phi_r(\\GG(K_r))\\) holds for every \\(r\\ge2\\) and every weighted graph \\(\\GG\\).\nThe base case \\(r=2\\) is precisely~\\Cref{THM:Nikiforov-weighted}. \nThroughout the remainder of this section, we assume \\(r\\ge3\\) and that the statement holds for all smaller values. \n\nSuppose, for a contradiction, that \\eqref{equ:clique-lifting} fails for some weighted graph. \nBy Lemma~\\ref{LEM:reduction}, there exists a weighted graph \\(\\GG=\\GG(\\vec{\\mathbf{x}}, \\bA)\\) of order \\(n\\), \nwhich attains a local maximum of \\(\\Phi_{r}(\\GG(K_r))-\\GG(K_{r+1})>0\\), has all vertex weights positive, and admits parameters \\(p\\ge r\\) and \\(0<\\alpha<1/p\\) such that, writing \\(\\gamma=\\frac{p}{2(p+1)}(1-\\alpha^2)\\), \nwe have \\(\\GG(K_r)=F_r(\\gamma)\\) and, hence, \\(\\GG(K_{r+1})< \\Phi_r(\\GG(K_r))=\\Phi_r(F_r(\\gamma))=F_{r+1}(\\gamma)\\). \nAt the point \\(x_0\\coloneqq F_r(\\gamma)\\), differentiating \\(\\Phi_r=F_{r+1}\\circ F_r^{-1}\\) via the chain rule and the \\(\\alpha\\)-parametrization (see Appendix~\\ref{APP:derivatives} for details) yields\n\\begin{equation}\n \\lambda=\\Phi_r'(x_0)=\\frac{p-r+1}{(r-1)(p+1)}(1+\\alpha). \\label{eq:value-of-lambda}\n\\end{equation}\n\n\nSince \\(\\GG\\) is a local maximum of \\(\\Phi_r(\\GG(K_r))-\\GG(K_{r+1})\\) under \\(\\sum_i x_i=1\\), Lagrange multipliers, together with the first equation of \\eqref{eq:derivative-identities}, yield that there exists a constant \\(\\mu\\) such that \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:vertex-general}\n \\GG_i(K_{r})=\\lambda \\GG_i(K_{r-1})-\\mu,\n\\end{equation}\nfor all \\(i\\in [n]\\). \nBy multiplying~\\eqref{eq:vertex-general} by \\(x_i\\) and summing over \\(i\\in [n]\\), we derive that\n\\[\n \\mu=r\\lambda \\GG(K_r)-(r+1)\\GG(K_{r+1}).\n\\]\n\\noindent\\text{Now we set}\\hfill\n\\(\\displaystyle\n\\mu_0 \\coloneqq r\\lambda F_r(\\gamma)-(r+1)F_{r+1}(\\gamma)\n= \\frac{r+1}{r-1}\n\\frac{1}{(p+1)^{r+1}}\\binom{p+1}{r+1}(1+\\alpha)^r.\n\\)\\hfill\\null\n\n\\smallskip\n\\noindent Since \\(\\GG(K_r)=F_{r}(\\gamma)\\) and \\(\\GG(K_{r+1})<F_{r+1}(\\gamma)\\), we obtain \\(\\mu>\\mu_{0}>0\\). Define\n\\begin{equation*}\n M\\coloneqq\\frac{\\mu}{\\mu_{0}}>1 \\quad \\text{and}\\quad \\eta_i\\coloneqq \\frac{\\lambda}{\\mu}\\cdot \\GG_i(K_{r-1}).\n\\end{equation*}\n\nWe need a crucial estimate for the weighted degree $\\rho_i\\coloneqq\\GG_i(K_1)$ for every vertex $i\\in [n]$ (see Claim~\\ref{CLAIM:local-general}) for later proofs.\nTo proceed, we first provide the following estimates on the value of \\(\\eta_{i}\\). \n\n\\begin{claim}\\label{CLAIM:range-of-eta}\n For every vertex \\(i\\in [n]\\), we have \\(1\\le\\eta_i\\le r\\).\n\\end{claim}\n\\begin{proof}\n Since \\(\\mu(\\eta_{i}-1)=\\GG_i(K_r)\\ge 0\\) and \\(\\mu>0\\), it follows that \\(\\eta_i\\ge1\\). \n If \\(a_{ij}>0\\), since \\(\\GG\\) is a local maximum, decreasing \\(a_{ij}\\) cannot increase \\(\\Phi_r(\\GG(K_{r}))-\\GG(K_{r+1})\\). \n Using the second equation of \\eqref{eq:derivative-identities}, we obtain \n \\begin{equation}\\label{eq:edge-general}\n \\GG_{ij}(K_{r-1})\\le \\lambda \\GG_{ij}(K_{r-2}) \\quad \\text{for all} \\quad a_{ij}>0.\n \\end{equation}\n By multiplying~\\eqref{eq:edge-general} by \\(x_{j}a_{ij}\\) and summing over all \\(j\\), we derive that\n\\[\n r\\mu (\\eta_{i}-1)=r \\GG_i(K_r)\n =\\sum_{j\\neq i} x_j a_{ij}\\GG_{ij}(K_{r-1})\n \\le \\lambda\\sum_{j\\neq i} x_j a_{ij}\\GG_{ij}(K_{r-2})\n =(r-1)\\lambda \\GG_i(K_{r-1})=(r-1)\\mu \\eta_{i}, \n\\]\nwhich implies \\(\\eta_i\\le r\\). This completes the proof of Claim~\\ref{CLAIM:range-of-eta}. \n\\end{proof}\n\nNow we are ready to prove the following lower bound on the weighted degree \\(\\rho_{i}=\\GG_i(K_1)\\). \n\n\\begin{claim}\\label{CLAIM:local-general}\nFor every vertex \\(i\\in [n]\\), we have\n\\begin{equation}\n \\rho_{i}\\ge\n \\frac{p(1+\\alpha)}{p+1}M^{1/(r-1)}\n \\cdot \\frac{\\eta_i+r(r-2)}{r(r-1)}. \\label{eq:lower-bound-of-degree}\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{claim}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nFix \\(i\\in [n]\\). It suffices to show that \\(\\rho_{i}\\ge \\tau_{i}\\), where we set\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\tau_{i}\\coloneqq\\frac{p(1+\\alpha)}{p+1}M^{1/(r-1)}\\cdot \\frac{\\eta_i+r(r-2)}{r(r-1)}.\n\\end{equation*}\n \nIf \\(\\rho_i=0\\), then \\(\\GG_i(K_{r-1})=\\GG_i(K_r)=0\\), and the equation \\eqref{eq:vertex-general} forces \\(\\mu=0\\), contradicting \\(\\mu>\\mu_0>0\\). \nHence, we may assume \\(\\rho_i>0\\).\nConsider the weighted neighborhood graph \\(\\GG^{(i)}\\). \nApplying the induction hypothesis to \\(\\GG^{(i)}\\) together with~\\eqref{eq:neighborhood-graph}, we obtain \n\\begin{equation}\n \\frac{\\GG_i(K_r)}{\\rho_{i}^r}= \\GG^{(i)}(K_r)\\ge \\Phi_{r-1}(\\GG^{(i)}(K_{r-1})) = \n \\Phi_{r-1}\\left(\\frac{\\GG_i(K_{r-1})}{\\rho_{i}^{r-1}}\\right). \\label{eq:neighborhood-inq}\n\\end{equation}\nNow define\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\beta\\coloneqq\\frac{r-\\eta_{i}}{\\eta_{i}+r(r-2)}.\n\\end{equation*}\nBy Claim~\\ref{CLAIM:range-of-eta},\nwe have \\(1\\le \\eta_{i}\\le r\\), and hence \\(0\\le\\beta\\le1/(r-1)\\). \nThe parameter \\(\\beta\\) is introduced so that the quantities \\(\\tau_i, \\GG_i(K_{r-1}), \\GG_i(K_r)\\) admit closed algebraic expressions in terms of the functions $P_{r-1}(p,\\beta)$ and $P_r(p,\\beta)$ defined in \\eqref{equ:P_r}. \nMore precisely, we have (see Appendix~\\ref{APP:derivatives} for the derivation) \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:key-eq-clique-lifting}\n \\frac{\\GG_i(K_{r-1})}{\\tau_{i}^{r-1}}\n =P_{r-1}(p,\\beta)\n \\quad \\text{and} \\quad \n \\frac{\\GG_i(K_r)}{\\tau_{i}^r}\n =M^{-1/(r-1)}P_r(p,\\beta). \n\\end{equation}\n\nNow we split the remaining proof of this claim into two cases based on the value of \\(\\eta_{i}\\). Note that $\\eta_i\\geq 1$.\n\n\\medskip\n\n\\noindent\\underline{\\textbf{The case when \\(\\eta_{i}>1\\):}} In this case, we have \\(\\GG_i(K_r)=\\mu(\\eta_{i}-1)>0\\). \nBy \\eqref{eq:key-eq-clique-lifting} and Lemma~\\ref{LEM:envelope}, it follows that \n\\begin{equation*}\n \\Phi_{r-1}\\left(\\frac{\\GG_i(K_{r-1})}{\\tau_{i}^{r-1}}\\right)\n =\\Phi_{r-1}(P_{r-1}(p,\\beta))\n \\ge P_r(p,\\beta)= M^{1/(r-1)}\\frac{\\GG_i(K_r)}{\\tau_{i}^r}> \\frac{\\GG_i(K_r)}{\\tau_{i}^r},\n\\end{equation*}\nwhere the last strict inequality holds because $M>1$ and $\\GG_i(K_r)>0$.\nIf \\(\\rho_{i}<\\tau_{i}\\), then \\(\\GG_i(K_{r-1})/\\rho_{i}^{r-1}>\\GG_i(K_{r-1})/\\tau_{i}^{r-1}\\). \nBy Lemma~\\ref{LEM:ratio}, the mapping \\( u\\longmapsto \\frac{\\Phi_{r-1}(u)}{u^{r/(r-1)}}\\) is non-decreasing and thus we have\n\\[\n \\rho_{i}^r\\Phi_{r-1}\\left(\\frac{\\GG_i(K_{r-1})}{\\rho_{i}^{r-1}}\\right)\n =\\GG_i(K_{r-1})^{r/(r-1)}\n \\frac{\\Phi_{r-1}(\\GG_i(K_{r-1})/\\rho_{i}^{r-1})}{(\\GG_i(K_{r-1})/\\rho_{i}^{r-1})^{r/(r-1)}}\n \\geq \n \\tau_{i}^r\\Phi_{r-1}\\left(\\frac{\\GG_i(K_{r-1})}{\\tau_{i}^{r-1}}\\right)> \\GG_i(K_r).\n\\]\nThis contradicts~\\eqref{eq:neighborhood-inq}. Therefore, indeed we have \\(\\rho_{i}\\ge \\tau_{i}\\) when \\(\\eta_{i}>1\\). \n\n\\medskip\n\n\\noindent\\underline{\\textbf{The case when \\(\\eta_{i}=1\\):}} In this case, we have \\(\\GG_i(K_r)=0\\) and \\(\\beta=1/(r-1)\\). If \\(\\rho_{i}<\\tau_{i}\\), then\n\\[\n \\frac{\\GG_i(K_{r-1})}{\\rho_{i}^{r-1}}>\\frac{\\GG_i(K_{r-1})}{\\tau_{i}^{r-1}}\n =P_{r-1}\\left(p,\\frac1{r-1}\\right) \\ge \\frac{1}{(r-1)^{r-1}}, \n\\]\nwhere the equation holds by \\eqref{eq:key-eq-clique-lifting}\nand the last inequality holds since \\(P_{r-1}\\left(p,1/(r-1)\\right)\\) is non-decreasing in \\(p\\in [r,\\infty)\\) and it is equal to \\(1/(r-1)^{r-1}\\) at \\(p=r\\). \nSince $\\Phi_{r-1}(\\cdot)$ is strictly increasing on $\\big[1/(r-1)^{r-1},1/(r-1)!\\big)$, \n\\[\n \\Phi_{r-1}\\left(\\frac{\\GG_i(K_{r-1})}{\\rho_{i}^{r-1}}\\right)>\\Phi_{r-1}\\left(\\frac{1}{(r-1)^{r-1}}\\right)=0 = \\frac{\\GG_i(K_r)}{\\rho_{i}^{r}},\n\\]\nwhich contradicts~\\eqref{eq:neighborhood-inq} again. \nTherefore \\(\\rho_{i}\\ge \\tau_{i}\\) also when \\(\\eta_{i}=1\\). \nThis completes the proof of Claim~\\ref{CLAIM:local-general}.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\medskip\n\nWe now finish the proof. Using the definition of \\(\\eta_{i}, \\GG_i(K_{r-1}), F_{r}(\\gamma), \\mu_{0}\\) and the equation~\\eqref{eq:value-of-lambda}, \n\\begin{align*}\n \\sum_i x_i\\eta_i\n =&\\frac{\\lambda}{\\mu}\\sum_i x_i \\GG_i(K_{r-1})\n =\\frac{r\\lambda \\GG(K_r)}{\\mu}\n =\\frac{r}{M}\\cdot \\lambda\\cdot F_r(\\gamma)\\Big/\\mu_0\\\\\n =& \\frac{r}{M}\\cdot \\frac{(p-r+1)(1+\\alpha)}{(r-1)(p+1)}\\cdot \\frac{\\binom{p+1}{r}}{(p+1)^r}\n (1+\\alpha)^{r-1}\\bigl(1-(r-1)\\alpha\\bigr)\\Big/\\left( \\frac{r+1}{r-1}\n \\frac{\\binom{p+1}{r+1}}{(p+1)^{r+1}}(1+\\alpha)^r \\right) \\\\\n =&\\frac{r(1-(r-1)\\alpha)}{M}, \n\\end{align*}\nwhere the last equation uses the identity \\(\\binom{p+1}{r+1}=\\frac{p-r+1}{r+1}\\binom{p+1}{r}\\).\nMultiplying \\eqref{eq:lower-bound-of-degree} by \\(x_i\\) and summing over all $i\\in [n]$, together with the above equation, we derive \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:K2-lower}\n 2\\GG(K_2)=\\sum_{i}x_{i}\\rho_{i}\\ge\n \\frac{p(1+\\alpha)}{(p+1)(r-1)}\n \\left((r-2)M^{1/(r-1)}+\n \\frac{1-(r-1)\\alpha}{M^{(r-2)/(r-1)}}\\right).\n\\end{equation}\nOn the other hand, using the induction hypothesis repeatedly, we obtain \n\\begin{align*}\n F_{r}^{-1}(\\GG(K_r))\\ge F_{r-1}^{-1}(\\GG(K_{r-1}))\\ge F_{r-2}^{-1}(\\GG(K_{r-2}))\n \\ge\\cdots\\ge F_{2}^{-1}(\\GG(K_{2}))=\\GG(K_2).\n\\end{align*}\nSince \\(\\GG(K_r)=F_r(\\gamma)\\), it follows that \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:k2-upper}\n 2\\GG(K_2)\\le 2\\gamma=\\frac{p}{p+1}(1-\\alpha^2).\n\\end{equation}\nCombining~\\eqref{eq:K2-lower} and~\\eqref{eq:k2-upper} and canceling the positive factor \\(p(1+\\alpha)/(p+1)\\), we obtain that\n\\begin{equation}\\label{equ:h(M)}\n h(M)\\coloneqq (r-2)M^{1/(r-1)}+\n \\frac{1-(r-1)\\alpha}{M^{(r-2)/(r-1)}}\n \\le (r-1)(1-\\alpha). \n\\end{equation}\nNote that $M>1$, and \nthe function $h(M)$ is strictly increasing for any $M>1$, since \n\\[\n \\frac{\\dd h(M)}{\\dd M}=\\frac{r-2}{r-1}M^{-(r-2)/(r-1)}\n \\left(1-\\frac{1-(r-1)\\alpha}{M}\\right)\n >0 \\quad \\text{whenever} \\quad M>1.\n\\]\nHence, we have \\(h(M)>h(1)=(r-1)(1-\\alpha)\\), a contradiction to \\eqref{equ:h(M)}. \nThe proof of~\\Cref{THM:clique-lifting} is complete. \n\\qed\n\n\n\\section{Concluding Remarks}\\label{SEC:concluding}\n\\noindent We determine the asymptotically sharp lower bound on the \\(t\\)-clique density \\(p_t(G)\\) in graphs \\(G\\) with a given \\(s\\)-clique density \\(p_s(G)\\), for all \\(2\\le s<t\\). \nIn the case \\(s=2\\), this provides a new proof of the clique density theorem of Reiher~\\cite{reiher2016clique}. \nWe conclude by showing how the proof of our main result can be adapted to obtain a stability result: if\n\\(\np_t(G)\\le F_t\\bigl(F_s^{-1}(p_s(G))\\bigr)+o(1),\n\\)\nthen \\(G\\) must be close to a family of well-structured graphs.\nWe also discuss a related general problem.\n\n\\subsection{Stability of Theorem~\\ref{THM:ordinary-main}}\n\\noindent\nStability versions of the clique density theorem have been studied extensively; see \\cite{pikhurko2017asymptotic,liu2020exact} for the triangle density case and \\cite{kim2020asymptotic} for the general clique density setting.\nLet \\(t\\ge 3\\) be an integer. \nTo proceed, we need to first describe the family \\(\\mathcal{H}_{t,n}\\) of \\(n\\)-vertex graphs introduced in~\\cite{kim2020asymptotic}.\nFor \\(\\gamma=1/2\\), let\n\\(\\mathcal H_{\\gamma,n}\\coloneqq\\{K_n\\}\\). \nFor \\(0\\le\\gamma<1/2\\), let \\(1\\le p\\in \\mathbb{N}\\) and \\(c\\in(1/(p+1),1/p]\\) be the unique parameters satisfying that\n\\[\n \\gamma=\\frac12\\Big(1-\\big(pc^2+(1-pc)^2\\big)\\Big).\n\\]\nLet \\(V_1,\\ldots,V_{p+1}\\) be a partition of an \\(n\\)-vertex set with \\(|V_1|=\\cdots=|V_p|=\\lfloor cn\\rfloor\\) and \\(|V_{p+1}|=n-p\\lfloor cn\\rfloor\\), and put \\(U\\coloneqq V_p\\cup V_{p+1}\\). Let \\(\\mathcal H_{\\gamma,n}\\) be the family\nof all graphs obtained from the complete \\(p\\)-partite graph with parts\n\\(V_1,\\ldots,V_{p-1},U\\) by adding inside \\(U\\) an arbitrary triangle-free\ngraph with exactly \\(|V_p||V_{p+1}|\\) edges. \nFinally, let \\(\\mathcal H_{t,n}\\) be the union of \\(\\mathcal H_{\\gamma,n}\\) over all \\(0\\le \\gamma\\le 1/2\\) and the family of \\(n\\)-vertex \\(K_t\\)-free graphs. \n\nNow we state and prove a stability version of Theorem~\\ref{THM:ordinary-main}. It characterizes graphs asymptotically minimizing \\(K_t\\) for a given \\(s\\)-clique density: every such graph is close in edit distance to a graph in \\(\\mathcal{H}_{t,n}\\).\n\n\\begin{theorem}\\label{THM:ordinary-stability}\nLet \\(2\\le s<t\\). For every \\(\\varepsilon>0\\), there are \\(\\delta>0\\) and \\(n_0\\) such that the following\nholds for every graph \\(G\\) on \\(n\\ge n_0\\) vertices. If\n\\[\n p_t(G)\\le F_{t} \\big ( F_{s}^{-1}(p_s(G)) \\big ) +\\delta,\n\\]\nthen \\(G\\) can be made isomorphic to some graph in \\(\\mathcal{H}_{t,n}\\) by adding or deleting at most \\(\\varepsilon n^{2}\\) edges. \n\\end{theorem}\n\nIn what follows, we show how the proof of Theorem~\\ref{THM:ordinary-main} can be adapted to establish this result. We work in the language of graphons; for standard terminology, see the monograph of Lov\\'asz~\\cite{lovasz2012large}. Let \\(\\mathcal H_t\\) denote the graphon analogue of \\(\\mathcal{H}_{t,n}\\), viewed as a family of weak isomorphism classes of graphons.\nWe shall use the graphon versions of Theorem~\\ref{THM:Main} (i.e., Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting}) and Lemma~\\ref{LEM:quadratic-MM}. These follow routinely from the standard step-graphon approximation argument, so we omit the details. In particular, every graphon \\(W\\) satisfies\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:graphon-version} \np_t(W)\\ge F_t\\bigl(F_s^{-1}(p_s(W))\\bigr)\\quad \\text{for all} \\quad t>s\\ge 2.\\footnote{Here and throughout, we let \\(p_r(W)\\coloneqq t(K_r,W)/r!\\) for a graphon \\(W\\).}\n\\end{equation}\nWe also need the following lemma, which reduces the general clique-to-clique stability to the edge-to-clique case.\n\n\\begin{lemma}\\label{lem:rigidity}\nLet \\(r\\ge 2\\) and \\(W\\) be a graphon. If \\(p_{r+1}(W)=\\Phi_r(p_r(W))>0\\), then \\(p_r(W)=F_r(p_2(W))\\).\n\\end{lemma}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nThe case \\(r=2\\) is immediate. Assume \\(r\\ge 3\\) and \\(p_{r+1}(W)=\\Phi_r(p_r(W))>0\\). \nIf \\(p_r(W)=\\theta_{p,r}\\) for some $p\\ge r$, then \\(p_{r+1}(W)=\\Phi_r(\\theta_{p,r})=\\theta_{p,r+1}\\). \nUsing the graphon version of Lemma~\\ref{LEM:quadratic-MM}, we obtain \\(p_{r-1}(W)\\ge \\theta_{p,r-1}\\). \nApplying \\eqref{eq:graphon-version} with $(t,s)=(r,r-1)$, we obtain \\(p_{r-1}(W)\\le \\theta_{p,r-1}\\).\nSo \\(p_{r-1}(W)=\\theta_{p,r-1}\\). \nIterating this argument leads to \\(p_2(W)=\\theta_{p,2}\\). Consequently, \\(p_{r}(W)=\\theta_{p,r}=F_r(\\theta_{p,2})=F_r(p_2(W))\\), as desired. \n\nNow suppose that \\(p_r(W)\\in (\\theta_{p-1,r}, \\theta_{p,r})\\) for some integer \\(p\\ge r\\). \nLet \\(\\gamma \\coloneqq F_r^{-1}(p_r(W))\\). Repeating the argument in the proof of Theorem~\\ref{THM:clique-lifting}, with \n\\(\\lambda=\\Phi_r'(p_r(W))\\), gives\n\\[\n\\mu=r\\lambda p_r(W)-(r+1)p_{r+1}(W)\n =r\\lambda F_r(\\gamma)-(r+1)F_{r+1}(\\gamma)=\\mu_0.\n\\]\nThus \\(M=\\mu/\\mu_0=1\\), and the lower bound~\\eqref{eq:K2-lower} yields \\(p_2(W)\\ge \\frac{p}{2(p+1)}(1-\\alpha^2)=\\gamma=F_r^{-1}(p_r(W))\\). So $p_r(W)\\le F_r(p_2(W))$. Applying~\\eqref{eq:graphon-version} with \\((t,s)=(r,2)\\), we have \\(p_r(W)=F_r(p_2(W))\\), completing the proof. \n\\end{proof}\n\n\nWith this lemma in hand, we are ready to present the proof of Theorem~\\ref{THM:ordinary-stability}.\n\n\\begin{proof}[\\bf Proof of Theorem~\\ref{THM:ordinary-stability}.]\nFix \\(t>s\\ge 2\\).\nSuppose this fails. Then there exist \\(\\varepsilon>0\\) and a sequence of graphs \\(G_n\\) with \\(|V(G_n)|\\to\\infty\\) such that\n\\(p_t(G_n) \\le F_t\\bigl(F_s^{-1}(p_s(G_n))\\bigr)+o(1),\n\\)\nyet each \\(G_n\\) is at edit distance at least \\(\\varepsilon|V(G_n)|^2\\) from every graph in \\(\\mathcal H_{t,|V(G_n)|}\\).\nBy passing to a subsequence if necessary, let \\(W\\) be the limit graphon of the sequence of graphs \\(G_{n}\\). Then we have \\(p_t(W) \\le F_t\\bigl(F_s^{-1}(p_s(W))\\bigr)\\).\nTogether with~\\eqref{eq:graphon-version}, we have \n\\begin{equation}\\label{equ:p(W)}\n p_t(W) = F_t\\bigl(F_s^{-1}(p_s(W))\\bigr).\n\\end{equation}\n\nLet \\(\\gamma \\coloneqq F_s^{-1}(p_s(W))\\).\nIf \\(F_t(\\gamma)=0\\), then \\(p_t(W)=0\\), and thus \\(G_n\\) contains \\(o(|V(G_n)|^t)\\) copies of \\(K_t\\). \nBy the Graph Removal Lemma~\\cite{erdos1986asymptotic}, \\(G_n\\) can be made \\(K_t\\)-free after deleting \\(o(|V(G_n)|^2)\\) edges. Since all \\(K_t\\)-free graphs belong to \\(\\mathcal H_{t,|V(G_n)|}\\), this is a contradiction.\n\nNow we may assume that \\(F_t(\\gamma)>0\\). By~\\eqref{eq:graphon-version} and the monotonicity of $F_r$, we have \n\\[\nF_t^{-1}(p_t(W))\\ge F_{t-1}^{-1}(p_{t-1}(W))\\ge\\cdots\\ge F_{s+1}^{-1}(p_{s+1}(W))\\ge F_s^{-1}(p_s(W)).\n\\]\nBy \\eqref{equ:p(W)}, we have \\(F_t^{-1}(p_t(W))=F_s^{-1}(p_s(W))=\\gamma>0\\).\nThus every intermediate inequality above must be an equality. In particular, \\(p_{s+1}(W)=\\Phi_s(p_s(W))>0\\). \nUsing Lemma~\\ref{lem:rigidity}, we have \\(p_s(W)=F_s(p_2(W))\\) and thus \\(p_t(W)=F_t\\bigl(F_s^{-1}(p_s(W))\\bigr)=F_t(p_2(W)).\\)\nWe now use the characterization of extremal graphons for the clique density theorem: \\cite[Theorem~2.1]{pikhurko2017asymptotic} (for \\(t=3\\)) and \\cite[Theorem~1.6]{kim2020asymptotic} (for \\(t\\ge 3\\)) show that\n\\[\np_t(W)=F_t(p_2(W))\n\\iff\n[W]\\in\\mathcal H_t\n\\quad \\text{for~} t\\ge 3,\n\\]\nwhere \\([W]\\) denotes the weak isomorphism class of \\(W\\). It follows from \\([W]\\in \\mathcal{H}_t\\) that there exist graphs \\(H_n\\in\\mathcal H_{t,|V(G_n)|}\\) such that, up to relabeling,\n\\(|E(G_n)\\triangle E(H_n)|=o\\bigl(|V(G_n)|^2\\bigr).\\)\\footnote{For this implication, we refer the reader to the proof of \\cite[Theorem~1.2]{kim2020asymptotic}.}\nThis is a contradiction.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\subsection{A General Problem}\n\n\\noindent\nFor a fixed graph \\(F\\), let \\(k_F(G)\\) denote the number of unlabeled copies of \\(F\\) in a graph \\(G\\), and let $p_F(G)\\coloneqq\\frac{k_F(G)}{|V(G)|^{|V(F)|}}$ denote the {\\it\\(F\\)-density} of \\(G\\).\nFor two fixed graphs \\(F\\) and \\(H\\), define\n\\[\n \\varphi_{F,H}(x)\n \\coloneqq\n \\inf \\left\\{\n \\liminf_{n\\to\\infty} p_H(G_n):\n |V(G_n)|\\to\\infty,\\ \n \\liminf_{n\\to\\infty} p_F(G_n)\\ge x\n \\right\\},\n\\]\nwhenever the set on the right-hand side is non-empty. Thus \\(\\varphi_{F,H}(x)\\) is the asymptotically smallest possible \\(H\\)-density among graphs whose \\(F\\)-density is at least \\(x\\). Evidently, \\(\\varphi_{F,H}\\) is non-decreasing.\n\nIn the case of cliques, Theorem~\\ref{THM:ordinary-main} determines this function explicitly. For \\(2\\le s<t\\), it gives\n\\[\n \\varphi_{K_s,K_t}(x)\n =\n F_t(F_s^{-1}(x)).\n\\]\nThe domain of this function is naturally divided into intervals by the critical points \\(\\theta_{p,s}\\), and on each such interval the function is concave (see Figure~\\ref{fig:Curve}). This suggests the following general problem.\n\n\\begin{problem}\\label{PROB:general-pairs}\n\tDetermine all pairs \\((F,H)\\) of graphs for which the function\n\t\\(\\varphi_{F,H}\\) is piecewise concave.\n\\end{problem}\n\nHere ``piecewise concave'' means that the domain of \\(\\varphi_{F,H}\\) can be divided into finitely or countably many intervals such that the restriction of \\(\\varphi_{F,H}\\) to each interval is concave. The above problem appears to be quite far-reaching. A natural first step is to consider the case \\(F=K_2\\), and to determine for which graphs \\(H\\) the edge-to-\\(H\\) function \\(\\varphi_{K_2,H}\\) is piecewise concave.\n\n\n\n\\section*{Acknowledgments}\n\\noindent J.M. was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFA1010201) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant 12125106.\nT.W. and T.Z. were supported by the Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology (2021ZD0302902).\n\n\n\\section*{Declaration on the Use of AI} \n\\noindent The main result of this paper, namely the sharp \\(K_s\\to K_t\\) statement for all \\(2\\le s<t\\), was conceived and formulated by the authors. During the exploratory stage of this work, AI-assisted tools were used to generate candidate proof ideas and assist with calculations. In particular, these tools helped the authors obtain an initial derivation of the \\(K_3 \\to K_4\\) result on the first non-trivial interval \\(1/27 \\le p_3(G) \\le 1/16\\). \nBuilding on this initial derivation, the authors developed the mathematical framework of the paper and established the results presented herein. \nAI-assisted tools were also used for formula checking and proofreading.\nAll AI-assisted outputs were independently checked and verified by the authors, who take full responsibility for the content of this work.\n\n\\bibliographystyle{plain}\n\\bibliography{references}\n\n\\appendix\n\n\n\\section{Proof of Lemma~\\ref{LEM:quadratic-MM}}\\label{APP:quadratic}\n\\noindent We include a short proof of Lemma~\\ref{LEM:quadratic-MM}, adapted from the proof of Proposition 3.1 in Reiher~\\cite{reiher2016clique}. \nThe argument may be viewed as a weighted double-counting of the pairs $(L,\\{u,v\\})$, where $L\\subseteq V(G)$ has size $r-1$ and $u,v\\in V(G)\\setminus L$ (not necessarily distinct) are such that both $L\\cup \\{u\\}$ and $L\\cup \\{v\\}$ induce copies of $K_r$ in $G$.\n\n\n\\begin{proof}[\\bf Proof of Lemma~\\ref{LEM:quadratic-MM}]\nLet \\(\\GG=\\GG(\\vec{\\mathbf{x}}, \\bA)\\) be a weighted graph of order \\(n\\). For \\(S\\subseteq[n]\\) write\n\\[\n A_S\\coloneqq\\prod_{e\\in \\binom{S}{2}}a_e\n \\quad\\text{and}\\quad\n X_S\\coloneqq\\prod_{i\\in S}x_i.\n\\]\nFix an integer \\(r\\ge2\\). For each \\(M\\in \\binom{[n]}{r+1}\\), define\n\\[\n B_M\\coloneqq\\sum_{e\\in \\binom{M}{2}}\\prod_{f\\in \\binom{M}{2}\\setminus\\{e\\}}a_f,\n \\quad \\text{and}\\quad\n C_M\\coloneqq\\sum_{N\\in \\binom{M}{r}}A_N.\n\\]\nWe first claim that\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:appendix-B-C}\n 2B_M-C_M\\le (r^2-1)A_M.\n\\end{equation}\nBoth sides are multilinear in the variables \\(a_e\\) corresponding to the pairs \\(e\\subseteq M\\). Therefore, it suffices to verify \\eqref{eq:appendix-B-C} when each \\(a_e\\in\\{0,1\\}\\).\nIf at least two pairs in \\(M\\) have weight \\(0\\), then \\(A_M=B_M=0\\) and \\eqref{eq:appendix-B-C} is immediate. If exactly one pair has weight \\(0\\), then \\(A_M=0\\) and \\(B_M=1\\). Moreover, the only \\(r\\)-subsets that form cliques are the two obtained by deleting one of the vertices of that pair; hence \\(C_M=2\\).\nFinally, if no pair has weight \\(0\\), then \\(A_M=1\\), \\(B_M=\\binom{r+1}{2}\\), and \\(C_M=r+1\\). Therefore,\n\\(2B_M-C_M=2\\binom{r+1}{2}-(r+1)=r^2-1.\\)\nThis proves \\eqref{eq:appendix-B-C}. \n \nMultiplying \\eqref{eq:appendix-B-C} by \\(X_M\\) and\nsumming over all \\(M\\in\\binom{[n]}{r+1}\\), we get\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:appendix-sumBC}\n \\sum_{M\\in\\binom{[n]}{r+1}}(2B_M-C_M)X_M\n \\le (r^2-1)\\GG(K_{r+1}).\n\\end{equation}\n\nFor each \\(L\\in\\binom{[n]}{r-1}\\), we define\n\\[\n \\eta_L\\coloneqq\\sum_{i\\in[n]\\setminus L} \\left(x_i\\prod_{\\ell\\in L}a_{i\\ell}\\right)\n \\quad \\text{and} \\quad\n \\Omega\\coloneqq\\sum_{L\\in\\binom{[n]}{r-1}}A_LX_L\\eta_L^2.\n\\]\nExpanding \\(\\eta_L^2\\), we write $\\Omega=\\Omega_{1}+\\Omega_{2}$, where \n\\begin{align*}\n\\Omega_{1}\n&\\coloneqq \\sum_{L\\in \\binom{[n]}{r-1}} A_LX_L \\sum_{i\\neq j, \\{i,j\\}\\cap L=\\emptyset} \\left(x_i\\prod_{\\ell\\in L}a_{i\\ell}\\right) \\left(x_j\\prod_{\\ell\\in L}a_{j\\ell}\\right)= 2\\sum_{M\\in\\binom{[n]}{r+1}}B_MX_M,\\\\\n\\Omega_{2}\n&\\coloneqq\\sum_{L\\in\\binom{[n]}{r-1}}A_LX_L\n \\sum_{i\\in[n]\\setminus L}x_i^2\\prod_{\\ell\\in L}a_{i\\ell}^2 \\le\n \\sum_{L\\in\\binom{[n]}{r-1}}A_LX_L\n \\sum_{i\\in[n]\\setminus L}x_i^2\\prod_{\\ell\\in L}a_{i\\ell} \\\\\n&=\\sum_{Q\\in\\binom{[n]}{r}}A_QX_Q\\sum_{i\\in Q}x_i\n =\\sum_{Q\\in\\binom{[n]}{r}}A_QX_Q\\left(1-\\sum_{i\\notin Q}x_i\\right)\n =\\GG(K_r)-\\sum_{M\\in\\binom{[n]}{r+1}}C_MX_M.\n\\end{align*}\nThen using \\eqref{eq:appendix-sumBC}, we have\n\\[\n \\Omega\n \\le \\GG(K_r)+\\sum_{M\\in\\binom{[n]}{r+1}}(2B_M-C_M)X_M\n \\le \\GG(K_r)+(r^2-1)\\GG(K_{r+1}).\n\\]\nFinally, by Cauchy's inequality, we derive \n\\[\n\\big(r\\GG(K_r)\\big)^2=\\left(\\sum_{L\\in\\binom{[n]}{r-1}}A_LX_L\\eta_L\\right)^2\n\\le\n\\left(\\sum_{L\\in\\binom{[n]}{r-1}}A_LX_L\\right)\n\\left(\\sum_{L\\in\\binom{[n]}{r-1}}A_LX_L\\eta_L^2\\right)=\\GG(K_{r-1})\\cdot \\Omega.\n\\]\nCombining the two inequalities above, we obtain\n\\[\nr^2\\GG(K_r)^2\\le \\GG(K_{r-1})\\cdot \\Omega\\le \\GG(K_{r-1})\\bigl(\\GG(K_r)+(r^2-1)\\GG(K_{r+1})\\bigr).\n\\]\nThis proves the lemma. \n\\end{proof}\n\n\\section{Supplementary Calculations}\\label{APP:derivatives}\n\n\\noindent\nThis appendix supplies the detailed calculations that are stated without proof in the main text. \n\n\\vspace{1em}\n\n\\noindent\n\\textbf{\\underline{Verification for Equation~\\eqref{eq:log-derivative}.}} \nLet $\\widetilde{r}\\in \\{r-1,r\\}$. From the definition of \\(F_{\\widetilde{r}}(\\gamma)\\), taking logarithms leads to\n \\begin{align*}\n \\log F_{\\widetilde{r}}(\\gamma)\n &= ({\\widetilde{r}}-1)\\log(1+\\alpha) + \\log\\bigl(1-({\\widetilde{r}}-1)\\alpha\\bigr) + f(p,{\\widetilde{r}}),\n \\end{align*}\nwhere \\(f(p,{\\widetilde{r}})\\) denotes a function only depending on $p$ and ${\\widetilde{r}}$. \nSince $0<\\alpha<1/p\\leq 1/(r-1)$, we obtain\n\\begin{align*}\n \\frac{\\dd}{\\dd\\alpha}\n \\log\\left(\\frac{F_r(\\gamma)}{F_{r-1}(\\gamma)^{r/(r-1)}}\\right)=\n &\\frac{r-1}{1+\\alpha} - \\frac{r-1}{1-(r-1)\\alpha}\n - \\frac{r}{r-1}\\Bigl(\\frac{r-2}{1+\\alpha} - \\frac{r-2}{1-(r-2)\\alpha}\\Bigr) \\\\\n =&\\ \\frac{1}{1+\\alpha}\\cdot\\frac{1}{r-1}\n - \\frac{r-1}{1-(r-1)\\alpha}\n + \\frac{r(r-2)}{(r-1)(1-(r-2)\\alpha)} \\\\\n =&-\\frac{r\\alpha}{(1+\\alpha)(1-(r-2)\\alpha)(1-(r-1)\\alpha)}<0.\n\\end{align*}\nThis verifies Equation \\eqref{eq:log-derivative}.\\qed\n\n\\vspace{1em}\n\n\\noindent\n\\textbf{\\underline{Verification for Equation~\\eqref{eq:slope}.}} \nLet $\\widetilde{q}\\in \\{q-1,q\\}$.\nRecall that \\(Z_{\\widetilde{q}}(x)\\) is defined by writing \\(P_{r+1}(\\widetilde{q},\\beta)\\) as a function of \\(x = P_r(\\widetilde{q},\\beta)\\). \nFirst, by the definition of \\(P_{r}(\\widetilde{q},\\beta)\\), we have \n \\begin{align*}\n \\frac{\\dd}{\\dd\\beta}P_r(\\widetilde{q},\\beta)\n = \\frac{\\binom{\\widetilde{q}}{r}}{(\\widetilde{q})^r}\n \\Bigl[(r-1)(1+\\beta)^{r-2}\\bigl(1-(r-1)\\beta\\bigr)\n + (1+\\beta)^{r-1}\\bigl(-(r-1)\\bigr)\\Bigr] \n = -\\frac{\\binom{\\widetilde{q}}{r}}{(\\widetilde{q})^r}\n \\cdot r(r-1)\\beta(1+\\beta)^{r-2}.\n \\end{align*}\nSimilarly, we obtain\n\\(\\frac{\\dd}{\\dd\\beta}P_{r+1}(\\widetilde{q},\\beta) = -\\frac{\\binom{\\widetilde{q}}{r+1}}{(\\widetilde{q})^{r+1}}\n \\cdot (r+1)r\\beta(1+\\beta)^{r-1}.\\)\nThen using the chain rule, we have\n \\[\n Z_{\\widetilde{q}}'(x)\n =\\frac{\\dd P_{r+1}(\\widetilde{q},\\beta)}\n {\\dd P_r(\\widetilde{q},\\beta)} =\\frac{\\dd P_{r+1}(\\widetilde{q},\\beta)/\\dd\\beta}\n {\\dd P_r(\\widetilde{q},\\beta)/\\dd\\beta}\n = \\frac{\\binom{\\widetilde{q}}{r+1}}{\\binom{\\widetilde{q}}{r}}\\cdot\\frac{1}{\\widetilde{q}}\\cdot\\frac{r+1}{r-1}\\cdot(1+\\beta)\n = \\frac{\\widetilde{q}-r}{\\widetilde{q}(r-1)}(1+\\beta),\n \\]\n as claimed in Equation~\\eqref{eq:slope}.\n\\qed\n\n\\vspace{1em}\n\n\\noindent\n\\textbf{\\underline{Verification for Equation~\\eqref{eq:value-of-lambda}.}} \nBy the chain rule and the formula for the derivative of an inverse function,\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\lambda=\\Phi_r'(x_0)\n = F_{r+1}'\\bigl(F_r^{-1}(x_0)\\bigr)\\cdot (F_r^{-1})'(x_0)\n = \\frac{F_{r+1}'(\\gamma)}{F_r'(\\gamma)} = \\frac{\\dd F_{r+1}/\\dd\\alpha}{\\dd\\gamma/\\dd\\alpha}\\big/ \\frac{\\dd F_r/\\dd\\alpha}{\\dd\\gamma/\\dd\\alpha}=\\frac{\\dd F_{r+1}/\\dd \\alpha}{\\dd F_{r}/\\dd\\alpha}.\n\\end{equation*}\nFor $\\widetilde{r}\\in \\{r,r+1\\}$, it is straightforward to compute the derivative \n\\(\\frac{\\dd}{\\dd\\alpha}\\Bigl[(1+\\alpha)^{\\widetilde{r}-1}\\bigl(1-(\\widetilde{r}-1)\\alpha\\bigr)\\Bigr]\\) \nas\n\\begin{align*}\n (\\widetilde{r}-1)(1+\\alpha)^{\\widetilde{r}-2}\\bigl(1-(\\widetilde{r}-1)\\alpha\\bigr)\n + (1+\\alpha)^{\\widetilde{r}-1}\\bigl(-(\\widetilde{r}-1)\\bigr) = -\\widetilde{r}(\\widetilde{r}-1)\\alpha(1+\\alpha)^{\\widetilde{r}-2}, \n\\end{align*}\nwhich implies that\n\\[\n \\frac{\\dd F_{\\widetilde{r}}}{\\dd \\alpha}= \\frac{\\binom{p+1}{\\widetilde{r}}}{(p+1)^{\\widetilde{r}}}\n \\cdot \\frac{\\dd}{\\dd \\alpha}\\Bigl[(1+\\alpha)^{\\widetilde{r}-1}\\bigl(1-(\\widetilde{r}-1)\\alpha\\bigr)\\Bigr]\n = -\\frac{\\binom{p+1}{\\widetilde{r}}}{(p+1)^{\\widetilde{r}}}\\cdot \\widetilde{r}(\\widetilde{r}-1)\\alpha(1+\\alpha)^{\\widetilde{r}-2}.\n\\]\nUsing the identity \\(\\binom{p+1}{r+1}/\\binom{p+1}{r} = (p+1-r)/(r+1)\\), we have\n\\begin{align*}\n \\lambda \n = \\frac{\\dd F_{r+1}/\\dd\\alpha}{\\dd F_r/\\dd\\alpha} \n = \\frac{\\binom{p+1}{r+1}}{\\binom{p+1}{r}}\\cdot\\frac{1}{p+1}\\cdot\\frac{r+1}{r-1}\\cdot(1+\\alpha)\n = \\frac{p-r+1}{(r-1)(p+1)}(1+\\alpha).\n\\end{align*}\nThis completes the calculation of \\(\\lambda\\) and verifies Equation~\\eqref{eq:value-of-lambda}.\n\\qed\n\n\\vspace{1em}\n\n\\noindent\n\\textbf{\\underline{Verification for Equation~\\eqref{eq:key-eq-clique-lifting}.}}\nFix \\(i\\in [n]\\). Throughout this proof, we let \n\\[\nL_{i}\\coloneqq \\frac{\\eta_{i}+r(r-2)}{r(r-1)}. \n\\]\nIt follows directly from the definition of \\(\\beta = \\frac{r-\\eta_i}{\\eta_i+r(r-2)}\\) and \\(L_{i}\\) that \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:app-beta-L}\n 1+\\beta = \\frac{1}{L_i}, \\quad\n 1-(r-2)\\beta = \\frac{\\eta_i}{rL_i} \\quad\\text{and}\\quad \n 1-(r-1)\\beta = \\frac{\\eta_i-1}{(r-1)L_i}. \n \\end{equation}\nBefore we verify the desired identities, let us recall all the relevant definitions and formulas as follows:\n \\[\n \\GG_i(K_{r-1}) = \\frac{\\mu\\eta_i}{\\lambda}, \\quad \\GG_i(K_r) = \\mu(\\eta_i-1),\\quad \n \\tau_i = \\frac{p(1+\\alpha)}{p+1}M^{1/(r-1)}\\cdot \\frac{\\eta_{i}+r(r-2)}{r(r-1)}=\\frac{p(1+\\alpha)}{p+1}M^{1/(r-1)}L_i,\n \\]\n \\[\n \\mu = M\\mu_0,\\quad\\mu_0 = \\frac{r+1}{r-1}\\frac{\\binom{p+1}{r+1}}{(p+1)^{r+1}}(1+\\alpha)^r,\n \\quad \\mbox{and} \\quad\n \\lambda = \\frac{p-r+1}{(r-1)(p+1)}(1+\\alpha). \n \\]\n \n Now we verify the first identity.\n We first compute the ratio \\(\\mu_0/\\lambda\\) as\n \\[\n \\frac{\\mu_0}{\\lambda}\n = \\frac{\\frac{r+1}{r-1}\\frac{\\binom{p+1}{r+1}}{(p+1)^{r+1}}(1+\\alpha)^r}\n {\\frac{p-r+1}{(r-1)(p+1)}(1+\\alpha)}\n = \\frac{r+1}{p-r+1}\\cdot\\frac{\\binom{p+1}{r+1}}{(p+1)^r}\\cdot(1+\\alpha)^{r-1}\n = \\frac{\\binom{p+1}{r}}{(p+1)^r}(1+\\alpha)^{r-1}.\n \\]\n Using~\\eqref{eq:app-beta-L}, we obtain\n \\[\n \\frac{\\eta_i}{rL_i^{\\,r-1}}\n = \\frac{\\eta_i}{rL_i}\\cdot\\frac{1}{L_i^{\\,r-2}}\n = \\bigl(1-(r-2)\\beta\\bigr)(1+\\beta)^{r-2}.\n \\]\n Using the above expressions, we derive the first identity as follows:\n \\begin{align*}\n \\frac{\\GG_i(K_{r-1})}{\\tau_i^{r-1}}\n &= \\frac{\\mu\\eta_i/\\lambda}\n {\\bigl(\\frac{p(1+\\alpha)}{p+1}M^{1/(r-1)}L_i\\bigr)^{r-1}}\n = \\frac{\\mu_0}{\\lambda}\\cdot \\frac{\\eta_i}{rL_i^{r-1}}\\cdot\n \\frac{r(p+1)^{r-1}}{p^{r-1}(1+\\alpha)^{r-1}}\\\\\n &= \\frac{\\binom{p+1}{r}}{(p+1)^r}(1+\\alpha)^{r-1}\\cdot \\bigl(1-(r-2)\\beta\\bigr)(1+\\beta)^{r-2}\\cdot \\frac{r(p+1)^{r-1}}{p^{r-1}(1+\\alpha)^{r-1}}\\\\\n &= \\frac{\\binom{p}{r-1}}{p^{r-1}}\n (1+\\beta)^{r-2}\\bigl(1-(r-2)\\beta\\bigr)\n = P_{r-1}(p,\\beta),\n \\end{align*}\n where the second equation follows by $\\mu=M\\mu_0$ and the second last equation holds because \\(r\\binom{p+1}{r}=(p+1)\\binom{p}{r-1}\\). \n\n Next we verify the second identity by similar computations.\n Using~\\eqref{eq:app-beta-L}, \\(\\eta_i-1 = (r-1)L_i\\bigl(1-(r-1)\\beta\\bigr)\\), so\n \\[\n \\frac{\\eta_i-1}{L_i^{\\,r}}\n = \\frac{(r-1)(1-(r-1)\\beta)}{L_i^{\\,r-1}}\n = (r-1)(1-(r-1)\\beta)(1+\\beta)^{r-1}.\n \\]\n This, together with \\(\\GG_i(K_r) = \\mu(\\eta_i-1)=M\\mu_0(\\eta_i-1)\\), implies that\n \\begin{align*}\n \\frac{\\GG_i(K_r)}{\\tau_i^r}\n &= \\frac{M\\mu_0(\\eta_i-1)}\n {\\bigl(\\frac{p(1+\\alpha)}{p+1}M^{1/(r-1)}L_i\\bigr)^r}\n = M^{-1/(r-1)}\\cdot\\mu_0\\cdot \\frac{\\eta_i-1}{L_i^r}\\cdot\n \\frac{(p+1)^r}{p^r(1+\\alpha)^r}\\\\\n &= M^{-1/(r-1)}\\cdot\\frac{r+1}{r-1}\\frac{\\binom{p+1}{r+1}}{(p+1)^{r+1}}(1+\\alpha)^r\n \\cdot (r-1)(1-(r-1)\\beta)(1+\\beta)^{r-1} \\cdot \\frac{(p+1)^r}{p^r(1+\\alpha)^r}\\\\\n & = M^{-1/(r-1)}\\cdot\\frac{\\binom{p}{r}}{p^r}\n (1+\\beta)^{r-1} (1-(r-1)\\beta)\n = M^{-1/(r-1)}\\cdot P_r(p,\\beta),\n \\end{align*}\n where the second last equation holds because \\((r+1)\\binom{p+1}{r+1}=(p+1)\\binom{p}{r}\\).\n This proves the second identity and completes the verification.\n\\qed\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: references.bib\n================================================\n@article{bollobas1976complete,\n author = {Bollob{\\'a}s, B{\\'e}la},\n title = {On complete subgraphs of different orders},\n journal = {Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society},\n volume = {79},\n number = {1},\n pages = {19--24},\n year = {1976},\n doi = {10.1017/S0305004100052063}\n}\n\n@article{erdos1986asymptotic,\n author = {Erd{\\H{o}}s, Paul and Frankl, P{\\'e}ter and R{\\\"o}dl, Vojt{\\v{e}}ch},\n title = {The asymptotic number of graphs not containing a fixed subgraph\n and a problem for hypergraphs having no exponent},\n journal = {Graphs and Combinatorics},\n volume = {2},\n pages = {113--121},\n year = {1986},\n doi = {10.1007/BF01788085}\n}\n\n\n@article{fisher1989lower,\n author = {Fisher, David Charles},\n title = {Lower bounds on the number of triangles in a graph},\n journal = {Journal of Graph Theory},\n volume = {13},\n number = {4},\n pages = {505--512},\n year = {1989},\n doi = {10.1002/jgt.3190130411}\n}\n\n@article{goodman1959sets,\n author = {Goodman, Adolph Winkler},\n title = {On sets of acquaintances and strangers at any party},\n journal = {The American Mathematical Monthly},\n volume = {66},\n number = {9},\n pages = {778--783},\n year = {1959},\n doi = {10.1080/00029890.1959.11989408}\n}\n\n@article{kim2020asymptotic,\n author = {Kim, Jaehoon and Liu, Hong and Pikhurko, Oleg and Sharifzadeh, Maryam},\n title = {Asymptotic structure for the clique density theorem},\n journal = {Discrete Analysis},\n year = {2020},\n pages = {Paper No. 19, 26 pp.},\n doi = {10.19086/da.18559}\n}\n\n@book{lovasz2012large,\n author = {Lov{\\'a}sz, L{\\'a}szl{\\'o}},\n title = {Large Networks and Graph Limits},\n series = {American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications},\n volume = {60},\n publisher = {American Mathematical Society},\n address = {Providence, RI},\n year = {2012},\n isbn = {978-0-8218-9085-1}\n}\n\n@incollection{lovasz1983number,\n author = {Lov{\\'a}sz, L{\\'a}szl{\\'o} and Simonovits, Mikl{\\'o}s},\n title = {On the number of complete subgraphs of a graph. {II}},\n booktitle = {Studies in Pure Mathematics},\n pages = {459--495},\n publisher = {Birkh{\\\"a}user},\n address = {Basel},\n year = {1983}\n}\n\n@article{moon1962problem,\n author = {Moon, John W. and Moser, Leo},\n title = {On a problem of {T}ur{\\'a}n},\n journal = {Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutat{\\'o} Int. K{\\\"o}zl.},\n volume = {7},\n pages = {283--286},\n year = {1962}\n}\n\n@article{nikiforov2011number,\n author = {Nikiforov, Vladimir},\n title = {The number of cliques in graphs of given order and size},\n journal = {Transactions of the American Mathematical Society},\n volume = {363},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1599--1618},\n year = {2011},\n doi = {10.1090/S0002-9947-2010-05189-X}\n}\n\n@article{nordhaus1963triangles,\n author = {Nordhaus, Edward A. and Stewart, Bonnie Madison},\n title = {Triangles in an ordinary graph},\n journal = {Canadian Journal of Mathematics},\n volume = {15},\n pages = {33--41},\n year = {1963},\n doi = {10.4153/CJM-1963-004-7}\n}\n\n@article{pikhurko2017asymptotic,\n author = {Pikhurko, Oleg and Razborov, Alexander A.},\n title = {Asymptotic structure of graphs with the minimum number of triangles},\n journal = {Combinatorics, Probability and Computing},\n volume = {26},\n number = {1},\n pages = {138--160},\n year = {2017},\n doi = {10.1017/S0963548316000110}\n}\n\n@article{razborov2007flag,\n author = {Razborov, Alexander A.},\n title = {Flag algebras},\n journal = {Journal of Symbolic Logic},\n volume = {72},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1239--1282},\n year = {2007},\n doi = {10.2178/jsl/1203350785}\n}\n\n@article{razborov2008minimal,\n author = {Razborov, Alexander A.},\n title = {On the minimal density of triangles in graphs},\n journal = {Combinatorics, Probability and Computing},\n volume = {17},\n number = {4},\n pages = {603--618},\n year = {2008},\n doi = {10.1017/S0963548308009085}\n}\n\n@article{reiher2016clique,\n author = {Reiher, Christian},\n title = {The clique density theorem},\n journal = {Annals of Mathematics},\n series = {2},\n volume = {184},\n number = {3},\n pages = {683--707},\n year = {2016},\n doi = {10.4007/annals.2016.184.3.1}\n}\n\n@article{turan1941extremal,\n author = {Tur{\\'a}n, P{\\'a}l},\n title = {Eine Extremalaufgabe aus der Graphentheorie},\n journal = {Matematikai {\\'e}s Fizikai Lapok},\n volume = {48},\n pages = {436--452},\n year = {1941}\n}\n\n\n@article{erdos1962number,\n author = {Paul Erd\\H{o}s},\n title = {On the Number of Complete Subgraphs Contained in Certain Graphs},\n journal = {Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutat{\\'o} Int. K{\\\"o}zl.},\n volume = {7},\n number = {3},\n pages = {459--464},\n year ={1962} \n}\n\n@article{schelp1998remark,\n author = {Schelp, Richard H. and Thomason, Andrew},\n title = {A remark on the number of complete and empty subgraphs},\n journal = {Combinatorics, Probability and Computing},\n volume = {7},\n number = {2},\n pages = {217--219},\n year = {1998},\n doi = {10.1017/S0963548397003234}\n}\n\n@article{motzkin1965maxima,\n author = {Motzkin, Theodore S. and Straus, Ernst G.},\n title = {Maxima for graphs and a new proof of a theorem of {T}ur{\\'a}n},\n journal = {Canadian Journal of Mathematics},\n volume = {17},\n pages = {533--540},\n year = {1965},\n doi = {10.4153/CJM-1965-053-6}\n}\n\n@book{bollobas1978extremal,\n author = {Bollob{\\'a}s, B{\\'e}la},\n title = {Extremal Graph Theory},\n series = {London Mathematical Society Monographs},\n volume = {11},\n publisher = {Academic Press},\n address = {London},\n year = {1978},\n isbn = {0-12-111750-2}\n}\n\n@article{liu2020exact,\n author = {Liu, Hong and Pikhurko, Oleg and Staden, Katherine},\n title = {The exact minimum number of triangles in graphs with given order and size},\n journal = {Forum of Mathematics, Pi},\n volume = {8},\n pages = {e8},\n year = {2020},\n doi = {10.1017/fmp.2020.7}\n}\n\n@article{alon2016,\n author = {Alon, Noga and Shikhelman, Clara},\n title = {Many {T} copies in {H}-free graphs},\n journal = {Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B},\n volume = {121},\n pages = {146--172},\n year = {2016},\n doi = {10.1016/j.jctb.2016.03.004}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Khadzhiivanov1978,\n author = {Khad\\v{z}iivanov, Nikolai G. and Nikiforov, Vladimir S.},\n title = {The {Nordhaus--Stewart--Moon--Moser} inequality},\n journal = {Serdica},\n volume = {4},\n number = {4},\n pages = {344--350},\n year = {1978},\n note = {In Russian}\n}\n\n@article{zykov1949linear,\n author = {Zykov, Aleksandr A.},\n title = {On some properties of linear complexes},\n journal = {Matematicheskii Sbornik. Novaya Seriya},\n volume = {24(66)},\n number = {2},\n pages = {163--188},\n year = {1949},\n language = {Russian}\n}\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091168,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31968"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31968"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Aman Patel"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Aman Patel, Mohmedmunavvar Mubarak Bapu, and Mrinmay Biswas"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Approximate Controllability of the generalized Burgers-Huxley equation in one dimension"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"48 pages, Comments Welcome!"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"math.OC math.AP"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"The generalized Burgers-Huxley (GBH) equation is a prototype model that describes the interplay among reaction, convection, and diffusion. In this article, we explore the controllability of this model by means of an interior control supported in an arbitrary non-empty open subset of the domain. We establish that the GBH equation is not globally approximately controllable in a given time. However, it is possible to steer the system from any steady state to an arbitrarily small neighborhood of another steady state in some suitable time by means of a localized interior control, provided that both steady states lie in the same connected component of the set of steady states."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:11:08 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:11:08 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Patel","Aman",""],["Bapu","Mohmedmunavvar Mubarak",""],["Biswas","Mrinmay",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Patel\",\n \"Aman\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Bapu\",\n \"Mohmedmunavvar Mubarak\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Biswas\",\n \"Mrinmay\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: V_8_28_06_26.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[11pt]{amsart}\n\\usepackage{amsthm, amsfonts, amsmath, amssymb}\n\\usepackage{dsfont}\n\\allowdisplaybreaks\n\\usepackage[all,cmtip]{xy}\n\\usepackage{tkz-euclide}\n\\usepackage{tikz-cd}\n%\\usepackage{tikz}\n\\usetikzlibrary{arrows}\n\\usepackage{mathtools} % for paired delimiters\\usepackage{comment}\n\\usepackage{mathrsfs} % for script capitals\n\\usepackage[all]{xy}\n\\usepackage{url,enumerate}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{setspace}\n\\usepackage[a4paper, top = 1.2in, bottom = 1.2in, left = 1.2in, right = 1.2in]{geometry}\n\\usepackage{cases}\n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\UseComputerModernTips\n\n%\\usepackage{showkeys}\n% User define Newcommand, Renewcommand\n\\newcommand{\\jcp}{J. Chem. Phys.}\n\n\\DeclareMathOperator{\\Rad}{Rad}\n\n% \\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}[section]\n\\newtheorem{lem}[thm]{Lemma}\n\\newtheorem{prop}[thm]{Proposition}\n\\newtheorem{coro}[thm]{Corollary}\n\\newtheorem*{prof}{Proof}\n\\theoremstyle{definition}\n\\newtheorem*{ques}{Question}\n\\newtheorem*{answer}{Answer}\n\\newtheorem*{prob}{Problem}\n\\newtheorem*{sol}{Solution}\n\\newtheorem{dfn}[thm]{Definition}\n%\\renewcommand{\\baselinestretch}{1.1}\n\\usepackage[OT2,T1]{fontenc}\n\\DeclareSymbolFont{cyrletters}{OT2}{wncyr}{m}{n}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Sha}{\\mathalpha}{cyrletters}{\"58}\n\n\\newtheorem{conj}[thm]{Conjecture}\n\\newtheorem{ass}[thm]{Assumption}\n\\newtheorem{remark}[thm]{Remark}\n\\theoremstyle{plain}\n\\newtheorem{cor}[thm]{Corollary}\n\\numberwithin{equation}{section}\n\\newtheorem{exple}[thm]{Examples}\n\n\n\n\n\\newcommand{\\A}{\\mathbb{A}}\n\\newcommand{\\C}{\\mathbb{C}}\n\\newcommand{\\F}{\\mathbb{F}}\n\\newcommand{\\mbH}{\\mathbb{H}}\n\\newcommand{\\N}{\\mathbb{N}}\n% \\newcommand{\\P}{\\mathbb{P}}\n\\newcommand{\\Q}{\\mathbb{Q}}\n\\newcommand{\\R}{\\mathbb{R}}\n\\newcommand{\\T}{\\mathbb{T}}\n\\newcommand{\\Z}{\\mathbb{Z}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\mfW}{\\mathbf{W}}\n\\newcommand{\\mcA}{\\mathcal{A}}\n\\newcommand{\\mcD}{\\mathcal{D}}\n\\newcommand{\\mcH}{\\mathcal{H}}\n\\newcommand{\\mcF}{\\mathcal{F}}\n\\newcommand{\\mcG}{\\mathcal{G}}\n\\newcommand{\\mcL}{\\mathcal{L}}\n\\newcommand{\\mcM}{\\mathcal{M}}\n\\newcommand{\\mcO}{\\mathcal{O}}\n\\newcommand{\\mcP}{\\mathcal{P}}\n\\newcommand{\\mcR}{\\mathcal{R}}\n\\newcommand{\\mcS}{\\mathcal{S}}\n\\newcommand{\\mcV}{\\mathcal{V}}\n\\newcommand{\\mcW}{\\mathcal{W}}\n\n\n\\newcommand{\\mfa}{\\mathfrak{a}}\n\\newcommand{\\mfb}{\\mathfrak{b}}\n\\newcommand{\\mfH}{\\mathfrak{H}}\n\\newcommand{\\mfh}{\\mathfrak{h}}\n\\newcommand{\\mfm}{\\mathfrak{m}}\n\\newcommand{\\mfn}{\\mathfrak{n}}\n\\newcommand{\\mfp}{\\mathfrak{p}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\mrB}{\\mathrm{B}}\n\\newcommand{\\mrG}{\\mathrm{G}}\n\\newcommand{\\mrH}{\\mathrm{H}}\n\\newcommand{\\mH}{\\mathrm{H}}\n\\newcommand{\\mrZ}{\\mathrm{Z}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\cyc}{\\mathrm{cyc}}\n\\newcommand{\\Fil}{\\mathrm{Fil}}\n\\newcommand{\\Gal}{\\mathrm{Gal}}\n%\\newcommand{\\res}{\\mathrm{Res}}\n\\newcommand{\\GL}{\\mathrm{GL}}\n\\newcommand{\\mo}{\\mathrm{mod\\ }}\n\\newcommand{\\mrp}{\\mathrm{p}}\n\\newcommand{\\SL}{\\mathrm{SL}}\n\n% \\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}\n% \\usepackage{charter}\n% \\usepackage{fullpage}\n\\newcommand{\\rank}{\\textrm{rank}}\n\\newcommand{\\corank}{\\textrm{corank}}\n\\newcommand{\\Sp}{\\textrm{Sp}}\n\\newcommand{\\ab}{\\textrm{ab}}\n\\newcommand{\\ord}{\\mathrm{ord}}\n\\newcommand{\\Hom}{\\mathrm{Hom}}\n\\newcommand{\\im}{\\mathrm{im}}\n\\newcommand{\\res}{\\mathrm{res}}%restriction map%\n\n\\newcommand{\\lra}{\\longrightarrow}\n\\newcommand{\\ra}{\\rightarrow}\n\\newcommand{\\rai}{\\hookrightarrow}\n\\newcommand{\\ras}{\\twoheadrightarrow}\n\n\\newcommand{\\repr}{\\rho_{f,\\wp}|_{G_p}}\n\\newcommand{\\GRF}{{\\rho}_{f,\\wp}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\lan}{\\langle}\n\\newcommand{\\ran}{\\rangle}\n\n\n\\newcommand{\\pmat}[4]{ \\begin{pmatrix} #1 & #2 \\\\ #3 & #4 \\end{pmatrix}}\n\\newcommand{\\cmat}[2]{ \\begin{pmatrix} #1 \\\\ #2 \\end{pmatrix}}\n\\newcommand{\\csmat}[2]{\\big( \\begin{smallmatrix} #1 \\\\ #2 \\end{smallmatrix}\\big)}\n\\newcommand{\\bmat}[4]{ \\begin{bmatrix} #1 & #2 \\\\ #3 & #4 \\end{bmatrix}}\n\\newcommand{\\pbmat}[4]{\\left \\{ \\begin{pmatrix} #1 & #2 \\\\ #3 & #4 \\end{pmatrix} \\right \\}}\n\\newcommand{\\psmat}[4]{\\bigl( \\begin{smallmatrix} #1 & #2 \\\\ #3 & #4 \\end{smallmatrix} \\bigr)}\n\\newcommand{\\bsmat}[4]{\\bigl[ \\begin{smallmatrix} #1 & #2 \\\\ #3 & #4 \\end{smallmatrix} \\bigr]}\n\\newcommand{\\pring}[2]{#1[x_1,\\ldots,x_#2]}\n\\newcommand{\\tuple}[2]{(#1_1, \\ldots, #1_{#2})}\n\\newcommand{\\ptuple}[2]{(#1_1: \\cdots: #1_{#2})}\n\\newcommand{\\mrm}[1]{\\mathrm{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\mb}[1]{\\mathbb{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\mcal}[1]{\\mathcal{#1}}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\t\\title[Approximate controllability of the GBH equation]{Approximate Controllability of the generalized Burgers-Huxley equation in one dimension}\n\n\\author[A. Patel]{Aman Patel}\n\\email{amanpat@iitk.ac.in}\n\\address{\n\tDepartment of Mathematics \\\\\n\tIndian Institute of Technology Kanpur\\\\\n\tKanpur-208016\\\\\n\tINDIA\n}\n\\author[M. M. Bapu]{Mohmedmunavvar Mubarak Bapu}\n\\email{munavvar.bapu87@gmail.com}\n\\address{\n\tDepartment of Mathematics \\\\\n\tIndian Institute of Technology Kanpur\\\\\n\tKanpur-208016\\\\\n\tINDIA\n}\n\\author[M. Biswas]{Mrinmay Biswas}\n\\email{mbiswas@iitk.ac.in}\n\\address{\n\tDepartment of Mathematics \\\\\n\tIndian Institute of Technology Kanpur\\\\\n\tKanpur-208016\\\\\n\tINDIA\n}\n\t\n\t\n\t%\\doublespacing\n\t\n\t\\begin{abstract}\n\t\tThe generalized Burgers-Huxley (GBH) equation is a prototype model that describes the interplay among reaction, convection, and diffusion. In this article, we explore the controllability of this model by means of an interior control supported in an arbitrary non-empty open subset of the domain. We establish that the GBH equation is not globally approximately controllable in a given time. However, it is possible to steer the system from any steady state to an arbitrarily small neighborhood of another steady state in some suitable time by means of a localized interior control, provided that both steady states lie in the same connected component of the set of steady states. \n\t\t \\newline\n\t\t \\newline\n\t\t \\noindent \\textit{Keywords.} Generalized Burgers-Huxley equation; Approximate controllability; Pole shifting; Lyapunov functional \n\t\t \\newline\n\t\t \\noindent \\textit{2020 Mathematics Subject Classification.} 93B05,\t93B52 , 93C20, \t93D15,\t93D05, 35Q92, 35K57\n\t\\end{abstract} \\maketitle\n\t\n\t%\\subjclass[2020]{93Dxx, 93D15, 35Q92, 93Bxx, 35K57}\n\t\n\t\n%\\usepackage[notref]{showkeys} %this_is_for_display_of_cite_name_and_equations\n\n%\\date{}\n\n\n\n%\\author{Patel A, Bapu M, Biswas M}\n%\\onehalfspacing\n\n%\\begin{document}\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\\section{Introduction}\nThe generalized Burgers--Huxley equation is a nonlinear partial differential equation that arises in several areas, including fluid mechanics, transport theory, population dynamics, and nerve signal propagation. It takes the form\n\\begin{equation}\\label{equation_one}\n u_t = u_{xx} - \\alpha u^\\delta u_x\n + \\beta u(1-u^\\delta)(u^\\delta-\\gamma),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\alpha, \\beta, \\gamma$ are positive constants and $\\delta\\in\\mathbb N$. This equation comprises three main components: the diffusion term $ u_{xx} $, which accounts for dissipative effects; the nonlinear convection term $ -\\alpha u^\\delta u_x $, which describes transport phenomena; and the nonlinear reaction term $ \\beta u(1-u^\\delta)(u^\\delta-\\gamma) $, which models growth and damping interactions. The combined presence of these mechanisms makes the mathematical analysis of the equation more involved. Equation~\\eqref{equation_one} generalizes the classical Burgers–Huxley equation, which is recovered by taking $\\delta=1$.\n\nSeveral mathematical properties of Burgers--Huxley type equations such as existence of solutions, stability and wave propagation have been studied by many authors; see for example \\cite{khattak2007,abdou2010} and the references therein. Different analytical aspects of this equation such as existence of solutions, asymptotic behavior, stability and traveling wave solutions have been studied by several authors; see for instance \\cite{mohan2021gbh,khattak2007,abdou2010} and the references therein.\n\nSeveral controllability and stabilization results for semilinear and quasilinear parabolic equations have been established during the last few decades due to their importance in physics, biology and engineering applications; see for instance \\cite{lions1988,fursikov1996,coron2007,fernandez2014,zuazua2005}. In particular, null controllability, approximate controllability and stabilization problems for nonlinear parabolic equations have been extensively investigated by using Carleman estimates, observability inequalities, spectral methods and fixed point techniques. Controllability problems for convection--diffusion equations and Burgers type systems have also attracted considerable attention because of the interaction between nonlinear transport and diffusion effects. From the control theoretic point of view, stabilization and feedback control problems for generalized Burgers--Huxley equations have received attention in recent years. Boundary feedback stabilization results were obtained in \\cite{singh2023boundary}, where the authors proved global existence of strong solutions together with exponential stabilization results under suitable boundary controls. Feedback stabilizability around nonconstant stationary solutions and Burgers--Huxley equations with memory were further investigated in \\cite{akram2025feedback,bag2026boundary}. Motivated by these developments, in the present article we investigate the approximate controllability properties of the generalized Burgers--Huxley equation by means of controls acting on a fixed proper subset of the spatial domain. \n%More precisely, we study whether the solution can be driven arbitrarily close to a desired target state in finite time by using localized controls. In the present work, we establish non-approximate controllability results for both distributed and boundary controlled generalized Burgers--Huxley equations. Motivated by these negative results, we further investigate whether approximate controllability may still hold for some particular classes of initial and target data.\n\n\n\n\nIn the present article, we study the following internally controlled generalized Burgers--Huxley equation with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions\n\\begin{equation}\\label{cntrl_eqn}\n\\begin{cases}\nu_t=u_{xx}-\\alpha u^\\delta u_x+\\beta u(1-u^\\delta)(u^\\delta-\\gamma)+\\chi_\\omega f,\n& \\text{in } (0,T)\\times(0,1),\\\\\nu(t,0)=u(t,1)=0,\n& t\\in(0,T),\\\\\nu(0,x)=u_0(x),\n& x\\in(0,1),\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $ \\alpha,\\beta,\\gamma $ are positive constants, $ \\delta \\in \\mathbb{N} $, $ f \\in L^2((0,T)\\times(0,1)) $ is a distributed control localized in the subdomain $ \\omega: = (b,c) \\subset (0,1) $ with $ 0<b<c<1 $, and $\\chi_\\omega$ denotes the characteristic function of $\\omega$.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThe present work extends the study of approximate controllability to the generalized Burgers–Huxley (GBH) equation in one dimension, which introduces two significant new difficulties beyond what was encountered in the \\cite{Shirshendu20}. The first is the presence of the Burgers-type nonlinear convection term $-\\alpha u^\\delta u_x ,$ which introduces a genuinely nonlinear transport structure. Unlike the purely reactive cubic nonlinearity in the FHN equation, this term couples the spatial derivative of the state variable with the state itself, making the quasi-static deformation argument considerably more delicate. Specifically, when linearizing along a path of steady states, the Burgers term produces a parameter-dependent first-order perturbation in the linearized operator, which must be carefully tracked through the spectral analysis, the construction of the eigenbasis, and the Lyapunov estimate. As a result, the quasi-static deformation framework of Coron–Trélat \\cite{Coron2004}, as adapted in \\cite{Shirshendu20}, does not carry over directly, and new estimates are required to control the remainder terms arising from this convective contribution.\nThe second difficulty lies in the spectral analysis of the associated parameter-dependent linearized operator. The linearized operator for \nthe GBH equation is not in Sturm--Liouville form due to the \npresence of the convection term. To address this, we introduce a suitable transformation and a conjugation by an appropriate weight function to reduce it to a Sturm–Liouville operator, which reduces the eigenvalue problem to an equivalent Sturm–Liouville form (see Subsection~\\ref{Spectral_Analysis_A}). This reduction is essential for obtaining a precise spectral characterization of the system. This necessitates working in weighted Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces equipped with a weighted inner product, and all subsequent estimates, projections, and basis arguments must be carried out in this weighted functional framework. The interplay among the weight function, the Burgers velocity, and the spectral parameter introduces nontrivial adjustments throughout the analysis, from the construction of the orthonormal basis to the design of the Lyapunov functional. These additional analytical difficulties make the controllability study of the generalized Burgers–Huxley equation substantially more delicate than the corresponding problems for standard semilinear heat-type equations.\n\nWe emphasize that our proof does not rely on the uniform boundedness result established in Theorem~3.21 of \\cite{Shirshendu20}. This suggests that the present method may be useful for studying systems that do not satisfy, or for which one cannot verify, such a uniform boundedness condition.\n \nTo the best of our knowledge, the combination of quasi-static deformation techniques with a weighted Sturm--Liouville spectral analysis, carried out entirely in weighted spaces, for a nonlinear convection-reaction-diffusion equation of Burgers--Huxley type has not been addressed in the existing controllability literature, making the present work a novel contribution in this direction.\n\nIn this article, we are interested in the approximate controllability of the system~\\eqref{cntrl_eqn}. We now provide the definition of approximate controllability for the system \\eqref{cntrl_eqn}. \n\n\\begin{dfn}[Approximate controllability]\\label{def:approx_controllability}\nLet $T>0$. The system \\eqref{cntrl_eqn} is said to be approximately controllable in time $T$ in $L^2(0,1)$ if, for every $u_0,u_T\\in L^2(0,1)$ and every $\\epsilon>0$, there exists a control\n$f\\in L^2((0,T)\\times(0,1))$ such that the corresponding solution $u$ of \\eqref{cntrl_eqn} with initial datum $u_0$ satisfies\n\\[\n\\|u(T)-u_T\\|_{L^2(0,1)}\\le \\epsilon.\n\\]\n\\end{dfn}\n\nOur first counter observation regarding approximate controllability via interior control is the following.\n\\begin{thm}\\label{thm1}\n Let $T>0$. Then, the system \\eqref{cntrl_eqn} is not approximate controllable in $L^2(0,1)$ with respect to the set of controls $f\\in L^2((0,T)\\times(0,1)).$\n\\end{thm} \nAnalogous observations hold for the boundary control system. Let us consider the following boundary control system\n\\begin{equation}\\label{bdry_cntrl_eqn}\n \\begin{cases}\n u_t=u_{xx} -\\alpha u^\\delta u_x+\\beta u(1-u^\\delta)(u^\\delta -\\gamma),\\;\\;\\;& {\\text{in}} \\;\\; (0,T)\\times(0,1),\\\\\n u(t,0)=f_1(t),\\;\\;u(t,1)=f_2(t),\\;\\;\\;\\;& t\\in(0,T),\\\\\n u(0,x)=u_0(x)\\;\\; &x\\in (0,1),\\\\\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $f_i\\in L^2(0,T)$ as control for $i=1,2$. In this case, we have the following result.\n\\begin{thm}\\label{thm2}\n Let $T>0$. Then, the system \\eqref{bdry_cntrl_eqn} is not $L^2(0,1)$-approximately controllable with respect to the set of controls $f_i\\in L^2(0,T),\\;i=1,2.$\n\\end{thm}\n\nThe proofs of Theorems~\\ref{thm1} and~\\ref{thm2} are given in Section~\\ref{LOGAC}. The proofs of Theorems \\eqref{thm1} and \\eqref{thm2} are inspired by the approach developed in \\cite{Furshikov_notapprox}, which relies on suitable weighted energy estimates for the system. \n\nBefore stating our next result, we provide the definition of steady states.\n\\begin{dfn}(Steady state).\n A function $u\\in C^2([0,1])$ is called a steady \nstate of the control system \\eqref{cntrl_eqn} if $u$ satisfies\n\\begin{equation}\\label{steady_state}\n \\begin{cases}\n u_{xx} -\\alpha u^\\delta u_x+\\beta u(1-u^\\delta)(u^\\delta -\\gamma) = 0,\\;\\;\\;& {\\text{in}} \\;\\; (0,b)\\cup(c,1),\\\\\n u(0)=u(1)=0.\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{dfn}\n\nLet $\\mcS$ denote the set of all steady states endowed with the $C^2$-topology. \nWe address the following controllability problem: is it possible to steer the system \nfrom any given steady state to another while remaining within the same path connected component of $\\mcS$?\nThe following theorem states the main positive result in this direction.\n\\begin{thm}\\label{Main_thm}\n Let $u_0,u_1 \\in \\mcS$ lie in the same path connected component of $\\mcS$. \nThen, for any given $\\hat{\\delta}>0$, there exists $T_{\\hat{\\delta}}>0$ such that for every $T \\ge T_{\\hat{\\delta}}$, \nthere exists a control $f \\in L^2((0,T)\\times(0,1))$ such that the solution $u$ of \\eqref{cntrl_eqn} satisfies\n\\begin{align}\\label{u_T_minus_u_1_leq_delta}\n \\|u(T, \\cdot)-u_1\\|_{L^2(0,1)} \\le \\hat{\\delta}.\n\\end{align}\n\\end{thm}\n\nTo prove the above Theorem~\\ref{Main_thm}, we adapt the quasi-static \ndeformation method introduced by Coron--Tr\\'elat \\cite{Coron2004}, \n\\cite{Coron06} for semi-linear heat and wave equations (see \nalso~\\cite{Schmidt06}).\n\nThe proof proceeds as follows. We linearize the system along a continuous \npath of steady states connecting the initial state $u_0$ to the target \n$u_1$, yielding a parameter-dependent linear system. To investigate its \nspectral properties, we consider the eigenvalue problem associated with the \nlinearized operator and transform it into an equivalent Sturm--Liouville \neigenvalue problem. The well-established theory of Sturm--Liouville operators \nthen provides a characterization of the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, from \nwhich we deduce that the eigenvalue problem admits an infinite sequence of \nreal eigenvalues tending to $-\\infty$ uniformly with respect to the \nparameter. Consequently, it may have only finitely many positive eigenvalues. \nUsing the eigenfunction expansion, we therefore decompose the system into an \ninfinite-dimensional stable part and a finite-dimensional unstable part. The \nfinite-dimensional unstable part of the non-autonomous linear control system \nis then stabilized via a pole-shifting technique, producing a feedback control \n$f \\in L^2((0,T)\\times(0,1))$. A suitable Lyapunov functional is subsequently \nemployed to establish approximate controllability for the full nonlinear \nsystem.\n\n The main novelty of this work is twofold. First, we show that, for any prescribed time $T>0$, targets lying outside a sufficiently large ball cannot be reached approximately in time $T$. Second, if the initial and target states belong to the same connected component of the set of steady states $\\mcS$, the quasi-static deformation method yields a control steering the solution arbitrarily close to the target. Whether approximate controllability holds for states belonging to different connected components of $\\mcS$, while remaining inside a sufficiently small ball (not exceeding the bound in \\eqref{assumption_uT}; see Section~\\ref{LOGAC}), remains an open problem.\n\n This paper is organized as follows. Section~\\ref{LOGAC} is devoted to global approximate controllability, where the proofs of Theorems~\\ref{thm1} and~\\ref{thm2} are provided. In Section~\\ref{QSD}, we investigate approximate controllability to steady states using the spectral structure of the parameter-dependent linearized operator. Building upon these results, we finally provide the proof of Theorem~\\ref{Main_thm}.\n\\section{Notations and preliminaries}\n\tLet us denote the Euclidean inner product and the norm in $\\mathbb{R}^{n}$ by $\\langle\\cdot,\\cdot\\rangle_2$ and $||\\cdot||_2$, respectively. Let $\\Gamma$ be a set and let $\\Theta:=\\{(\\epsilon, t):\\ 0<\\epsilon\\leq 1,\\ 0\\leq t\\leq 1/{\\epsilon}\\}.$ Let $F_1, F_2$ be two real valued functions defined on $\\Theta\\times \\Gamma$. The notation $F_1\\lesssim F_2$ means that $F_2\\geq 0$ and there exists a constant $C>0$ such that\n $$\\forall\\ (\\epsilon,t)\\in \\Theta,\\ \\forall\\ \\gamma \\in\\Gamma,\\quad F_1(\\epsilon,t,\\gamma)\\leq C F_2(\\epsilon,t,\\gamma)\\ .$$ We say that $F_1\\sim F_2$ if both $F_1\\lesssim F_2$ and $F_2\\lesssim F_1.$ \n \n We denote the Lebesgue function spaces over $\\Omega\\equiv (0,1)$ by $L^p(\\Omega)~(1\\leq p\\leq \\infty)$ with the norm \n\\[\n\\|u\\|_{L^p(\\Omega)} := \\left( \\int_\\Omega |u(x)|^p \\, dx \\right)^{1/p},~ u\\in L^p(\\Omega),~ (1\\leq p<\\infty),\n\\]\n\\[\n\\|u\\|_{L^\\infty(\\Omega)}\n:= \\operatorname*{ess\\,sup}_{x\\in\\Omega} |u(x)|,~ (p=\\infty).\n\\]\nFor an integer $k \\ge 0$ and $1 \\le p \\le \\infty$, we denote the usual Sobolev spaces by $W^{k,p}(\\Omega)$ and is defined by\n\\[\nW^{k,p}(\\Omega)\n:= \\left\\{\nu \\in L^p(\\Omega) \\; : \\;\nD^{\\alpha} u \\in L^p(\\Omega)\n\\ \\text{for all multi-indices } {\\alpha} \\text{ with } |{\\alpha}|\\le k\n\\right\\},\n\\]\n endowed with the norm\n\\[\n\\|u\\|_{W^{k,p}(\\Omega)}\n:= \\sum_{|\\alpha|\\le k} \\|D^\\alpha u\\|_{L^p(\\Omega)},~ (1\\leq p<\\infty),\n\\]\n\\[\n\\|u\\|_{W^{k,\\infty}(\\Omega)}\n:= \\max_{|\\alpha|\\le k} \\|D^\\alpha u\\|_{L^\\infty(\\Omega)},~ (p=\\infty).\n\\]\n We denote\n\\[\nH^k(\\Omega): = W^{k,2}(\\Omega),\n\\]\n which is a Hilbert space, and the norm is induced by the standard inner product\n\\[\n\\langle u,v\\rangle_{H^k(\\Omega)}\n:= \\sum_{|\\alpha|\\le k} \\int_\\Omega D^\\alpha u(x)\\, D^\\alpha v(x)\\, dx.\n\\]\nLet $(X,\\|\\cdot\\|_X)$ be a Banach space, and let $J \\subset [0,\\infty)$ be a time interval \n(possibly finite, $J=[0,T]$, or infinite, $J=[0,\\infty)$). We define the Bochner spaces\n\\[\nL^p(J; X) := \\Big\\{ u : J \\to X \\ \\text{strongly measurable} : \\int_J \\|u(t)\\|_X^p \\, dt < \\infty \\Big\\}\\ \\text{for}\\ 1\\leq p < \\infty;\n\\]\n\\[\nL^{\\infty}(J; X)\n:=\n\\Big\\{\nu:J\\to X \\;\\text{strongly measurable} \\;:\\;\n\\operatorname*{ess\\,sup}_{t\\in J}\\|u(t)\\|_X <\\infty\n\\Big\\},\n\\]\nendowed with the norm\n\\[\n\\|u\\|_{L^p(J; X)} := \\left( \\int_J \\|u(t)\\|_X^p \\, dt \\right)^{1/p},\\ \\text{for}\\ 1\\leq p <\\infty;\n\\]\n\\[\n\\|u\\|_{L^\\infty(J;X)}\n:=\n\\operatorname*{ess\\,sup}_{t\\in J}\\|u(t)\\|_X .\n\\]\nLet $C_0^\\infty(\\Omega)$ be the space of smooth functions with compact support in $\\Omega$. We denote by $H_0^1(\\Omega)$ the closure of $C_0^\\infty(\\Omega)$ in $H^1(\\Omega)$, and by $H^{-1}(\\Omega)$ the dual space of $H_0^1(\\Omega)$. The duality pairing between $H^{-1}(\\Omega)$ and $H_0^1(\\Omega)$ is denoted by $\\langle \\cdot,\\cdot \\rangle$. In one dimension, the following continuous embeddings hold:\n\\[\nH_0^1(\\Omega)\\hookrightarrow C(\\overline{\\Omega})\n\\hookrightarrow L^\\infty(\\Omega)\n\\hookrightarrow L^p(\\Omega),\n\\qquad \\forall\\, p\\in[1,\\infty).\n\\]\n\n\n\\section{Well-Posedness and Regularity}\nIn this section, we study the well-posedness and regularity of solutions to the generalized Burgers--Huxley equation. We first introduce the notions of weak and strong solutions and state the corresponding existence, uniqueness, and regularity results. Finally, in the absence of control, that is, when $(f=0)$, we show that nonnegative initial data give rise to nonnegative solutions.\n\nWe begin by providing the definitions of weak and strong solutions to the system \\ref{cntrl_eqn}\n\\begin{dfn}[Weak solution]\nLet $u_0\\in L^2(0,1)$ and $f\\in L^2(0,T;L^2(0,1)).$\nA function\n\\[\nu\\in L^\\infty(0,T;L^2(0,1))\n\\cap L^2(0,T;H_0^1(0,1))\n\\cap L^{2(\\delta+1)}(0,T;L^{2(\\delta+1)}(0,1))\n\\]\nwith\n\\[\nu_t\\in L^{1+\\frac{1}{2\\delta-1}}(0,T;H^{-1}(0,1))\n\\]\nis called a weak solution of \\eqref{cntrl_eqn} provided\n\\[\nu(0)=u_0 \\qquad \\text{in } L^2(0,1),\n\\]\nand satisfies\n\\begin{align}\n\\begin{cases}\n\\langle u_t(t),\\varphi\\rangle\n+ \\int_0^1 u_x(t,x)\\varphi_x(x)\\,dx\n+ \\alpha\\int_0^1 u^\\delta(t,x)u_x(t,x)\\varphi(x)\\,dx\n\\\\\n\\qquad \\qquad = \\beta\\int_0^1\nu(t,x)\\bigl(1-u^\\delta(t,x)\\bigr)\n\\bigl(u^\\delta(t,x)-\\gamma\\bigr)\\varphi(x)\\,dx\n\\\\\n \\qquad \\qquad \\qquad \\, + \\int_0^1 \\chi_\\omega(x)f(t,x)\\varphi(x)\\,dx, \n\\end{cases}\n\\end{align}\nfor all $\\varphi\\in H_0^1(0,1)$ and for a.e. $t\\in(0,T)$.\n\\end{dfn}\n\n\\begin{remark}\nThe initial condition $u(0)=u_0\\in L^2(0,1)$ in the definition of weak solution is understood with respect to the\nweakly continuous representative of $u$; that is,\n$$\n\\lim_{t\\to0^+}\n\\int_0^1 u(t,x)\\varphi(x)\\,dx\n=\n\\int_0^1 u_0(x)\\varphi(x)\\,dx\n\\qquad\n\\text{for every }\\varphi\\in H_0^1(0,1).\n$$\n\\end{remark}\n\n\\begin{dfn}[Strong solution] Let $u_0\\in H_0^1(0,1),\\\nf\\in L^2(0,T;L^2(0,1)).$\nA function\n$$u\\in C([0,T];H_0^1(0,1))\n\\cap L^2(0,T;H^2(0,1))\\ \\text{with} \\\nu_t\\in L^2(0,T;L^2(0,1))$$\nis called a strong solution of \\eqref{cntrl_eqn} provided $u(0)=u_0$ in $H_0^1(0,1)$,\nand\n$$u_t\n=\nu_{xx}\n-\\alpha u^\\delta u_x\n+\\beta u(1-u^\\delta)(u^\\delta-\\gamma)\n+\\chi_\\omega f$$\nholds in $L^2(0,1)$ for a.e. $t\\in(0,T)$.\n\\end{dfn}\n\nWe now state the existence-uniqueness and regularity results for weak and strong solutions of the system \\eqref{cntrl_eqn}. These results follow from~\\cite{Mohan2021}.\n\\begin{thm}\n Let $ u_0 \\in L^2(0,1) $ and $ f \\in L^2(0,T; L^2(0,1)) $. Then the system \\eqref{cntrl_eqn} admits at least one weak solution. \nMoreover, if $\\beta > (2^\\delta\\alpha)^2$, then the weak solution is unique. In particular, for $1\\le \\delta \\le 2$, uniqueness holds for all positive constants $\\alpha$ and $\\beta$.\n\\end{thm}\n\n\\begin{thm}\n Let $ u_0 \\in H^1_0(0,1) $ and $ f \\in L^2(0,T; L^2(0,1)) $. Then the system \\eqref{cntrl_eqn} admits a unique strong solution.\n\\end{thm}\nIn the absence of control (i.e., when $f \\equiv 0$), the system \\eqref{cntrl_eqn} reduces to\n\\begin{equation}\\label{without_cntrol_eqn}\n \\begin{cases}\n u_t=u_{xx} -\\alpha u^\\delta u_x+\\beta u(1-u^\\delta)(u^\\delta -\\gamma) ,\\;\\;\\;& {\\text{in}} \\;\\; (0,T)\\times(0,1),\\\\\n u(t,0)=u(t,1)=0,\\;\\;\\;\\;& t\\in(0,T),\\\\\n u(0,x)=u_0(x)\\;\\; &x\\in (0,1).\\\\\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nThe following proposition addresses the non-negativity of the solution:\n\\begin{prop} Let $u_0 \\in L^2(0,1)$ with $u_0 \\geq 0$. Then the solution $u$ of \\eqref{without_cntrol_eqn} with initial data $u_0$ satisfies $u \\geq 0$ in $(0,T) \\times (0,1)$. \\end{prop}\n\\begin{proof}\n Multiplying equation \\eqref{without_cntrol_eqn} by $-u^-:= -\\max\\{-u,0\\}$ and performing integration by parts, we obtain foe each $0\\leq t \\leq T$\n \\begin{equation}\\label{first_21}\n \\begin{split}\n \\frac{1}{2}\\frac{d}{dt}\\|u^-(t,\\cdot)\\|_{L^2(0,1)}^2+\\|u_x^-(t,\\cdot)\\|_{L^2(0,1)}^2&=\\int_0^1\\alpha(-u^-(t,x))^{\\delta+1}(u^-(t,x))_x\\;dx \\\\&- \\int_0^1 \\beta (u^-(t,x))^2(1-u^\\delta(t,x))(\\gamma-u^\\delta(t,x))\\;dx\\\\\n &:=I_1+I_2\n \\end{split}\n \\end{equation}\n First, we show that $I_1=0$. For that, we have \n \\begin{equation}\\label{I_1}\n \\begin{split}\n I_1&= \\int_0^1\\alpha(-u^-(t,x))^{\\delta+1}(u^-(t,x))_x\\;dx\\\\\n &= -\\frac{\\alpha}{\\delta+2}\\int_0^1 (-u^-(t,x))^{\\delta+2}_x\\;dx.\n \\end{split}\n \\end{equation}\n Performing integration by parts with the help of $u(t,0)=u(t,1)=0$ we obtain $I_1=0$. Now, we find an estimate for $I_2$. Using Cauchy–Schwarz and Young's inequality, we obtain\n \\begin{equation}\\label{estimate_I_2}\n \\begin{split}\n I_2&= -\\int_0^1 \\beta (u^-(t,x))^2(1-u^\\delta(t,x))(\\gamma-u^\\delta(t,x))\\;dx\\\\\n &=- \\int_0^1 \\beta (u^-(t,x))^2(1-(-u^-(t,x))^\\delta)(\\gamma-(-u^-(t,x))^\\delta)\\;dx\\\\\n &= -\\int_0^1 \\beta (u^-(t,x))^2 \\left(\\gamma-(\\gamma+1) (-u^-(t,x))^\\delta)+ (-u^-(t,x))^{2\\delta})\\right)\\;dx\\\\\n &= -\\beta\\gamma\\int_0^1|u^-(t,x)|^2\\;dx +\\beta (\\gamma+1) \\int_0^1 (-u^-(t,x))^{\\delta+2}\\;dx-\\beta\\int_0^1 |u^-(t,x)|^{2\\delta+2}\\;dx\\\\\n &\\leq -\\beta\\gamma\\int_0^1|u^-(t,x)|^2\\;dx \\frac{\\beta (\\gamma+1)^2}{2} \\int_0^1 |u^-(t,x)|^{2}\\;dx+\\frac{\\beta}{2}\\int_0^1 |u^-(t,x)|^{2\\delta+2}\\;dx\\\\&\\hspace{9cm}-\\beta\\int_0^1 |u^-(t,x)|^{2\\delta+2}\\;dx\\\\\n &\\leq \\frac{\\beta(\\gamma^2+1)}{2} \\int_0^1|u^-(t,x)|^2\\;dx\\\\\n &=\\frac{\\beta(\\gamma^2+1)}{2}\\|u^-(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{L^2(0,1)},\n \\end{split}\n \\end{equation}\nfor all $0\\leq t\\leq T$. Substituting this estimate \\eqref{estimate_I_2} in \\eqref{first_21}, we have \n\\begin{equation*}\n \\frac{1}{2}\\frac{d}{dt}\\|u^-(t,\\cdot)\\|_{L^2(0,1)}^2\\leq \\frac{\\beta(\\gamma^2+1)}{2}\\|u^-(t,\\cdot)\\|^2,\n\\end{equation*}\nfor all $0\\leq t\\leq T$. Finally, using Gr\\\"onwall's inequality, we get \n\\begin{equation}\\label{last_21}\n \\|u^-(t,\\cdot)\\|_{L^2(0,1)}^2 \\leq e^{\\beta(\\gamma^2+1)t }\\|u^-_0(\\cdot)\\|_{L^2(0,1)}^2,\n\\end{equation}\nfor all $0\\leq t\\leq T$. Since $u_0 \\geq 0$, it follows that $u^- = 0$. Therefore, from the estimate in \\eqref{last_21}, we conclude that $u^-(t,x) = 0$ for almost every $(t,x) \\in (0,T) \\times (0,1)$. Hence, $u \\geq 0$ in $(0,T) \\times (0,1)$.\n\\end{proof}\n \n\\section{On the Lack of Global Approximate Controllability}\\label{LOGAC}\nThis section is devoted to the proofs of Theorems~\\ref{thm1} and~\\ref{thm2}. We begin by defining the function $g:[0,b]\\subset [0,1]\\rightarrow \\R$ by $$g(x):= x^N(b-x)^N,\\;\\;\\;\\;\\;\\;\\;\\;\\;\\;\\;\\; x\\in [0,b]\\;\\; with \\;\\;N>4.$$\nNow we deduce the following estimate with the fact that $u,v\\geq 0.$ \n\\begin{lem}\n Let $T>0$. Let $u$ be the solution of the equation \\eqref{cntrl_eqn}. Then we have for $t\\in(0,T),$\n \\begin{equation}\\label{estimt1}\n \\frac{1}{2}\\frac{d}{dt}\\int_0^b g(x)u^2(t,x)\\;dx\\leq L(b,N),\n \\end{equation}\nwhere $L(b,N)$ is given by \n{\\small\\begin{equation*}\n \\begin{split}\n L(b,N):=\\int_0^b &\\Bigg[ \\frac{\\delta}{(1+\\delta)\\left(2^\\frac{\\delta-1}{\\delta}\\beta^{\\frac{1}{\\delta}}(1+\\delta)^{\\frac{1}{\\delta}}\\right)}\\left(\\frac{1}{2}\\big(x(b-x)\\big)^{\\frac{\\delta(N-2)-2}{\\delta}}J^{\\frac{1+\\delta}{\\delta}}\\right)\\\\&\\hspace{2cm}+ \\frac{\\left(N\\alpha/\\delta+2\\right)^\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta}}{\\left(\\frac{\\beta}{4}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{\\delta}\\right)}\\left(\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta+2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{\\delta}\\right)}}\\cdot \\frac{\\delta}{2\\delta+2}(b-2x)^{\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta}}\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^{\\frac{N\\delta-2\\delta-2}{\\delta}} \\\\&\\hspace{3.5cm}+ \\frac{\\left(\\beta(1+\\gamma)\\right)^\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta}}{\\left(\\frac{\\beta}{2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{\\delta}\\right)}\\left(\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta+2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{\\delta}\\right)}}\\cdot \\frac{\\delta}{2\\delta+2}\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^{{N}}\\Bigg]\\; dx.\n \\end{split}\n\\end{equation*}} \n\\end{lem}\n\\begin{proof}\n We'll use the shorthand $E_g$ for \n\\begin{equation}\\label{value_Eg}\n E_g(t,x):= \\frac{1}{2}\\frac{d}{dt}\\Big\\{g(x)u^2(t,x)\\Big\\},\\;\\;\\; (t,x)\\in (0,T)\\times[0,1]. \n\\end{equation}\nUsing equation \\eqref{cntrl_eqn} and Young's inequality, we can deduce\n\\begin{equation}\\label{E_g}\n \\begin{split}\n E_g&= g\\{uu_t\\}\\\\\n &= g\\left\\{u[u_{xx} -\\alpha u^\\delta u_x+\\beta u(1-u^\\delta)(u^\\delta -\\gamma) +\\chi _\\omega f ]\\right\\}\\\\\n &= g\\left\\{uu_{xx} -\\alpha u^{\\delta+1} u_x +\\beta u^2[u^\\delta-\\gamma-u^{2\\delta}+\\gamma u^\\delta]+\\chi _\\omega f u\\right\\}\\\\\n &=g\\left\\{(uu_x)_x-u_{x}^2-\\frac{\\alpha}{\\delta+2}(u^{\\delta+2})_x+\\beta u^{\\delta+2}-\\beta u^{2\\delta+2}-\\beta\\gamma u^2+\\beta\\gamma u^{\\delta+2}\\right\\}+guf\\chi_\\omega\\\\\n &\\leq g(uu_x)_x-\\frac{\\alpha}{\\delta+2}g(u^{\\delta+2})_x+\\beta gu^{\\delta+2}-\\beta gu^{2\\delta+2}+\\beta\\gamma gu^{\\delta+2}+guf\\chi_\\omega\\\\\n &= (guu_x)_x -\\left(\\frac{g^\\prime u^2}{2}\\right)_x +\\frac{g^{\\prime\\prime}u^2}{2}-\\frac{\\alpha}{\\delta+2}\\left(gu^{\\delta+2}\\right)_x+\\frac{\\alpha}{\\delta+2}g^\\prime u^{\\delta+2}\\\\&\\hspace{4cm}+\\beta gu^{\\delta+2}-\\beta gu^{2\\delta+2}+\\beta\\gamma gu^{\\delta+2}+guf\\chi_\\omega.\n \\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nWhen we perform integration over the interval $[0, b]$ and take into account the boundary conditions\n$$g^{\\prime}(0)=g^{\\prime\\prime}(0)=0=g^{\\prime}(b)=g^{\\prime\\prime}(b),$$\nWe can see that\n $$I_g(t):=\\frac{1}{2}\\frac{d}{dt}\\int_0^b g(x)u^2(t,x)\\;dx,$$\nsatisfies, for $t\\in (0,T)$\n\\begin{equation}\\label{I_g}\n I_g(t)\\leq \\int_0^b \\Big ( \\frac{g^{\\prime\\prime}u^2}{2}+\\frac{\\alpha}{\\delta+2}g^\\prime u^{\\delta+2}+\\beta gu^{\\delta+2}-\\beta gu^{2\\delta+2}+\\beta\\gamma gu^{\\delta+2}\\Big)\\;dx\n\\end{equation}\n\nLet us denote, for $(t,x)\\in(0,T)\\times[0,1], $\n\\begin{align*}\nL_1=\\frac{g^{\\prime\\prime}u^2}{2}=\\frac{1}{2}\\big(x(b-x)\\big)^{(N-2)}\\Big\\{N(N-1)(b-x)^2-2N^2x(b-x)+N(N-1)x^2\\Big\\}u^2,\n\\end{align*}\n%$$L_1=\\frac{g^{\\prime\\prime}u^2}{2}=\\frac{1}{2}\\big(x(b-x)\\big)^{(N-2)}\\Big\\{N(N-1)(b-x)^2-2N^2x(b-x)+N(N-1)x^2\\Big\\}u^2,$$\n\\begin{align*}\n L_2=\\frac{\\alpha}{\\delta+2}g^\\prime u^{\\delta+2}=\\frac{\\alpha N}{\\delta+2}\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^{N-1}(b-2x)u^{\\delta+2}\n\\end{align*}\n%$$L_2=\\frac{\\alpha}{\\delta+2}g^\\prime u^{\\delta+2}=\\frac{\\alpha N}{\\delta+2}\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^{N-1}(b-2x)u^{\\delta+2}$$\nand \n\\begin{align*}\nL_3=\\beta(1+\\gamma)gu^{\\delta+2}=\\beta(1+\\gamma)\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^Nu^{\\delta+2}.\n\\end{align*}\n%$$L_3=\\beta(1+\\gamma)gu^{\\delta+2}=\\beta(1+\\gamma)\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^Nu^{\\delta+2}.$$\n%\\begin{comment}\n \n%{\\color{purple}\\begin{equation*}\n%\\begin{aligned}\n%\\frac{g^{\\prime\\prime}u^2}{2}&=\\frac{1}{2}\\frac{d}{dx}\\Bigg(\\frac{d}{dx}(x^N(b-x)^N)\\Bigg)u^2\\\\\n % &=\\frac{1}{2}\\frac{d}{dx}\\Bigg(Nx^{(N-1)}(b-x)^N-Nx^N(b-x)^{(N-1)}\\Bigg)u^2\\\\\n % &= \\frac{1}{2}\\Bigg(N(N-1)x^{(N-2)}(b-x)^{N}-2N^2x^{(N-1)}(b-x)^{(N-1)}+N(N-1)x^N(b-x)^{(N-2)}\\Bigg)u^2\\\\\n % &=\\frac{1}{2}\\big(x(b-x)\\big)^{(N-2)}\\Bigg(N(N-1)(b-x)^2-2N^2x(b-x)+N(N-1)x^2\\Bigg)u^2\n%\\end{aligned}\n%\\end{equation*}}\\end{comment}\nDenote $$J=\\Big\\{N(N-1)(b-x)^2-2N^2x(b-x)+N(N-1)x^2\\Big\\}.$$\n% \\begin{comment}\n \n% {\\small{\\color{purple}\\begin{equation*}\n%\\begin{aligned}\n%%{\\text{First}} \\;\\;L_1&= \\frac{1}{2} \\big(x(b-x)\\big)^{N-2}u^2J\\\\\n% &= \\frac{\\beta^{\\frac{1}{1+\\delta}}(1+\\delta)^{\\frac{1}{1+\\delta}}}{2^\\frac{2}{1+\\delta}} \\big(x(b-x)\\big)^{\\frac{N}{1+\\delta}}u^2\\times\\frac{1}{2^\\frac{\\delta-1}{\\delta+1}\\beta^{\\frac{1}{1+\\delta}}(1+\\delta)^{\\frac{1}{1+\\delta}}}\\big(x(b-x)\\big)^{\\frac{\\delta(N-2)-2}{1+\\delta}}J\\\\\n % & {\\text{taking}} \\;\\;p= 1+\\delta\\; {\\text{and}} \\; q=\\frac{1+\\delta}{\\delta} \\;\\;{\\text{in young's inequality, we get}}\\\\\n% L_1& \\leq \\frac{\\beta}{4}\\Bigg( \\big(x(b-x)\\big)^Nu^{2+2\\delta}\\Bigg)+\\frac{\\delta}{(1+\\delta)\\left(2^\\frac{\\delta-1}{\\delta}\\beta^{\\frac{1}{\\delta}}(1+\\delta)^{\\frac{1}{\\delta}}\\right)}\\left(\\frac{1}{2}\\big(x(b-x)\\big)^{\\frac{\\delta(N-2)-2}{\\delta}}J^{\\frac{1+\\delta}{\\delta}}\\right)\\\\\n%{\\text{Second}}\\;\\; L_2&= \\frac{\\alpha N}{\\delta+2}\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^{N-1}(b-2x)u^{\\delta+2}\\\\\n% &=\\left(\\frac{\\beta}{4}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{2\\delta+2}\\right)}\\left(\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta+2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{2\\delta+2}\\right)}\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^{N\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{2\\delta+2}\\right)}u^{\\delta+2}\\\\&\\hspace{5cm}\\times \\frac{N\\alpha/\\delta+2}{\\left(\\frac{\\beta}{4}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{2\\delta+2}\\right)}\\left(\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta+2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{2\\delta+2}\\right)}}(b-2x)\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^{\\frac{N\\delta-2\\delta-2}{2\\delta+2}}\\\\\n % & {\\text{taking}} \\;\\;p= \\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta+2}\\; {\\text{and}} \\; q=\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta} \\;\\;{\\text{in young's inequality, we get}}\\\\\n % L_2& \\leq \\frac{\\beta}{4}\\Bigg( \\big(x(b-x)\\big)^Nu^{2+2\\delta}\\Bigg)+\\frac{\\left(N\\alpha/\\delta+2\\right)^\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta}}{\\left(\\frac{\\beta}{4}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{\\delta}\\right)}\\left(\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta+2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{\\delta}\\right)}}\\cdot \\frac{\\delta}{2\\delta+2}(b-2x)^{\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta}}\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^{\\frac{N\\delta-2\\delta-2}{\\delta}}\\\\\n % {\\text{Last}}\\;\\; L_3&= \\beta(1+\\gamma)\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^Nu^{\\delta+2}\\\\\n% &=\\left(\\frac{\\beta}{2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{2\\delta+2}\\right)}\\left(\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta+2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{2\\delta+2}\\right)}\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^{N\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{2\\delta+2}\\right)}u^{\\delta+2}\\\\&\\hspace{5cm}\\times \\frac{\\beta(1+\\gamma)}{\\left(\\frac{\\beta}{2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{2\\delta+2}\\right)}\\left(\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta+2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{2\\delta+2}\\right)}}\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^{\\frac{N\\delta}{2\\delta+2}}\\\\\n % & {\\text{taking}} \\;\\;p= \\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta+2}\\; {\\text{and}} \\; q=\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta} \\;\\;{\\text{in young's inequality, we get}}\\\\\n % L_3& \\leq \\frac{\\beta}{2}\\Bigg( \\big(x(b-x)\\big)^Nu^{2+2\\delta}\\Bigg)+\\frac{\\left(\\beta(1+\\gamma)\\right)^\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta}}{\\left(\\frac{\\beta}{2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{\\delta}\\right)}\\left(\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta+2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{\\delta}\\right)}}\\cdot \\frac{\\delta}{2\\delta+2}\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^{{N}}\\\\\n %\\end{aligned}\n%\\end{equation*}}}\\end{comment}\nApplying Young’s inequality, we have\n\\begin{equation}\\label{estimate_Li}\n \\begin{split}\n L_1&\\leq \\frac{\\beta}{4}\\Bigg( \\big(x(b-x)\\big)^Nu^{2+2\\delta}\\Bigg)+\\frac{\\delta}{(1+\\delta)\\left(2^\\frac{\\delta-1}{\\delta}\\beta^{\\frac{1}{\\delta}}(1+\\delta)^{\\frac{1}{\\delta}}\\right)}\\left(\\frac{1}{2}\\big(x(b-x)\\big)^{\\frac{\\delta(N-2)-2}{\\delta}}J^{\\frac{1+\\delta}{\\delta}}\\right),\\\\\n L_2&\\leq \\frac{\\beta}{4}\\Bigg( \\big(x(b-x)\\big)^Nu^{2+2\\delta}\\Bigg)+\\frac{\\left(N\\alpha/\\delta+2\\right)^\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta}}{\\left(\\frac{\\beta}{4}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{\\delta}\\right)}\\left(\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta+2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{\\delta}\\right)}}\\cdot \\frac{\\delta}{2\\delta+2}(b-2x)^{\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta}}\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^{\\frac{N\\delta-2\\delta-2}{\\delta}},\\\\\n L_3&\\leq \\frac{\\beta}{2}\\Bigg( \\big(x(b-x)\\big)^Nu^{2+2\\delta}\\Bigg)+\\frac{\\left(\\beta(1+\\gamma)\\right)^\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta}}{\\left(\\frac{\\beta}{2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{\\delta}\\right)}\\left(\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta+2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{\\delta}\\right)}}\\cdot \\frac{\\delta}{2\\delta+2}\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^{{N}}.\n \\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nUsing this estimates \\eqref{estimate_Li} in \\eqref{I_g}, we obtain\n{\\small\\begin{equation}\n \\begin{split}\n I_g(t)\\leq \\int_0^b &\\Bigg[ \\frac{\\delta}{(1+\\delta)\\left(2^\\frac{\\delta-1}{\\delta}\\beta^{\\frac{1}{\\delta}}(1+\\delta)^{\\frac{1}{\\delta}}\\right)}\\left(\\frac{1}{2}\\big(x(b-x)\\big)^{\\frac{\\delta(N-2)-2}{\\delta}}J^{\\frac{1+\\delta}{\\delta}}\\right)\\\\&\\hspace{2cm}+ \\frac{\\left(N\\alpha/\\delta+2\\right)^\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta}}{\\left(\\frac{\\beta}{4}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{\\delta}\\right)}\\left(\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta+2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{\\delta}\\right)}}\\cdot \\frac{\\delta}{2\\delta+2}(b-2x)^{\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta}}\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^{\\frac{N\\delta-2\\delta-2}{\\delta}} \\\\&\\hspace{3.5cm}+ \\frac{\\left(\\beta(1+\\gamma)\\right)^\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta}}{\\left(\\frac{\\beta}{2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{\\delta}\\right)}\\left(\\frac{2\\delta+2}{\\delta+2}\\right)^{\\left(\\frac{\\delta+2}{\\delta}\\right)}}\\cdot \\frac{\\delta}{2\\delta+2}\\left(x(b-x)\\right)^{{N}}\\Bigg]\\; dx\\\\\n &:= L(b,N).\n \\end{split}\n\\end{equation}}\n\n\n\\end{proof}\nUsing this lemma, we now prove \\ref{thm1}\n\\begin{proof}[\\bf{Proof of theorem \\ref{thm1}.}] Let $u_T\\in L^2(0,1).$ Let $u(t)$ be the solution of the system \\eqref{cntrl_eqn} and $T>0.$ Then, we get\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Y(T)}\n \\begin{split}\n ||u_T-u(T)||_{L^2(0,1)}&=\\Bigg(\\int_0^1 |u_T(x)-u(T,x)|^2\\; dx \\Bigg)^\\frac{1}{2}\\\\\n &\\geq \\Bigg(\\int_{\\frac{b}{4}}^{\\frac{b}{2}} |u_T(x)-u(T,x)|^2\\; dx \\Bigg)^\\frac{1}{2}\\\\\n &\\geq ||u_T||_{L^2\\left(\\frac{b}{4},\\frac{b}{2}\\right)}-||u(T,\\cdot)||_{L^2\\left(\\frac{b}{4},\\frac{b}{2}\\right)}.\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nIn virtue if \\eqref{estimt1} for any $T>0$ we have \n \\begin{equation}\n \\begin{split}\n \\int_0^b \\big(x(b-x)\\big)^N u^2(T,x)\\;dx\\leq \\int_0^b \\big(x(b-x)\\big)^N u_0^2(x)\\;dx+2TL(b,N).\n \\end{split}\n \\end{equation}\nUsing the inequality $$\\frac{3^{-N}b^{-2N}}{2^{-3N}}\\leq \\big(x(b-x)\\big)^{-N}\\leq \\frac{b^{-2N}}{2^{-3N}},\\;\\; {\\text {for}} \\; x\\in [b/4,b/2],$$\nwe obtain that \n\\begin{equation}\\label{estimate_u(T)}\n \\begin{split}\n ||u(T,\\cdot)||^2_{L^2\\left(\\frac{b}{4},\\frac{b}{2}\\right)}&\\leq \\int_\\frac{b}{4}^\\frac{b}{2} \\big(x(b-x)\\big)^{-N}\\big(x(b-x)\\big)^N u^2(T,x)\\;dx\\\\\n &\\leq \\bigg(\\frac{b^2}{8}\\bigg)^{-N}\\int_\\frac{b}{4}^\\frac{b}{2}\\big(x(b-x)\\big)^N u^2(T,x)\\;dx\\\\\n &\\leq \\bigg(\\frac{b^2}{8}\\bigg)^{-N}\\int_0^b \\big(x(b-x)\\big)^N u^2(T,x)\\;dx\\\\\n &\\leq \\bigg(\\frac{b^2}{8}\\bigg)^{-N} \\int_0^b \\big(x(b-x)\\big)^N u_0^2(x)\\;dx+2T\\bigg(\\frac{b^2}{8}\\bigg)^{-N}L(b,N).\n \\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nLet $T>0$ be fixed. Let $\\epsilon_0>0$ be given. Let $u_T\\in L^2(0,1)$ satisfying the condition \n\\begin{equation}\\label{assumption_uT}\n ||u_T||_{L^2\\left(\\frac{b}{4},\\frac{b}{2}\\right)}>\\bigg(\\frac{b^2}{8}\\bigg)^{\\frac{-N}{2} }\\Bigg[ \\int_0^b \\big(x(b-x)\\big)^N u_0^2(x)\\;dx \\;+2TL(b,N)\\Bigg]^{\\frac{1}{2}}+\\epsilon_0.\n\\end{equation}\nEquation \\eqref{assumption_uT} and \\eqref{estimate_u(T)} together gives \n\\begin{equation*}\n ||u_T||_{L^2\\left(\\frac{b}{4},\\frac{b}{2}\\right)}> ||u(T,\\cdot)||_{L^2\\left(\\frac{b}{4},\\frac{b}{2}\\right)}+\\epsilon_0.\n\\end{equation*}\n Using this equation in \\eqref{Y(T)} we obtain\n \\begin{equation*}\n ||u_T-u(T)||_{L^2(0,1)}>\\epsilon_0.\n \\end{equation*}\n This inequality implies that the system \\eqref{cntrl_eqn} is not approximately controllable.\n\n\\end{proof}\n\\begin{proof}[\\bf{Proof of Theorem~\\ref{thm2}}]\nThe proof follows exactly as in the proof of Theorem~\\ref{thm1}.\n\\end{proof}\n\\begin{remark}\n From \\eqref{estimate_u(T)} one can observe that for a given $T>0$ and $u_0\\in L^2(0,1)$, if the target $u_T\\in L^2(0,1)$ lies outside of a large ball i.e, in particular, $u_T$ satisfies \\eqref{assumption_uT} with $\\epsilon_0=0$, then, it is impossible to reach arbitrarily close to the state $u_T$ in time $T.$ \n\\end{remark}\n\n\\section{Steady States and Their Connected Components}\n\\begin{remark}\\label{PAC}\n Based on the work of Coron~\\cite{Coron2004}, one may expect some (partial) approximate controllability result. More precisely, we raise the following question: given any two states $u_0, u_1\\in L^2(0,1)$ and any $\\hat\\delta>0,$ do there exist $T=T(\\Hat\\delta, u_0, u_1)>0$ and $f\\in L^2(0, T; L^2(0, 1))$ such that the solution $u$ to \\eqref{cntrl_eqn} satisfies\n \\begin{align*}\n \\|u(T)-u_1\\| \\le \\hat\\delta .\n\\end{align*}\nAt present, we don't have a complete answer to this question. We have positive results only in the case, where $u_0, u_1$ are steady states lying in the same connected components of the set of steady states endowed with the $C^2$-topology(see section~\\ref{QSD}). We note that this is a weaker notion than approximate controllability, since here the time $T$ is allowed to depend \n on the tolerance $\\hat{\\delta}$, the initial state $u_0$, and \n the target state $u_1$, whereas in approximate controllability \n the time $T$ is prescribed in advance.\nFor further unknown results and open questions in this regard, we refer Section.\n\\end{remark}\n\\subsection{Characterization of steady state}\nThe following lemmas provide families of nontrivial solutions of the\nordinary differential equation in \\eqref{steady_state} on the intervals\n$[0,b]$ and $[c,1]$, satisfying the conditions\n$u(0)=0$ and $u(1)=0$, respectively. By combining a solution on\n$[0,b]$ with a solution on $[c,1]$, one obtains nontrivial functions\n\\[\nu\\in C^2\\bigl([0,b]\\cup[c,1]\\bigr)\n\\]\nthat satisfy \\eqref{steady_state} on $(0,b)\\cup(c,1)$.\n\n\\begin{lem}\\label{lem:left_ivp}\nThere exists $s_0>0$ such that, for each\n$s\\in(-s_0,s_0)$, the initial value problem\n\\begin{equation}\\label{ivp_ss}\n\\begin{cases}\nu_{xx}-\\alpha u^\\delta u_x+\\beta u(1-u^\\delta)(u^\\delta-\\gamma)=0,\n\\\\[1mm]\nu(0)=0,\n\\\\[1mm]\nu_x(0)=s,\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nadmits a unique solution $u\\in C^2([0,b])$.\nMoreover, if $s\\neq 0$, then $u$ is nontrivial.\n\\end{lem}\n\n\\begin{lem}\\label{lem:right_ivp}\n There exists $\\hat{s}_0>0$ such that,\nfor every $\\hat{s}\\in(-\\hat{s}_0, \\hat{s}_0)$, the initial value problem\n\\begin{equation}\\label{ivp_right}\n\\begin{cases}\nu_{xx}-\\alpha u^\\delta u_x\n+\\beta u(1-u^\\delta)(u^\\delta-\\gamma)=0,\n\\\\[1mm]\nu(1)=0,\n\\\\[1mm]\nu_x(1)=\\hat{s},\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nadmits a unique solution $u\\in C^2([c,1])$.\nMoreover, if $\\hat{s}\\neq0$, then $u$ is nontrivial.\n\\end{lem}\nThe proofs of Lemmas~\\ref{lem:left_ivp} and~\\ref{lem:right_ivp} are given in the Appendix.\n\n To study the approximate controllability properties of \\eqref{cntrl_eqn}, it is essential to characterize the set $\\mathcal{S}$ of steady states. To this end, we seek functions $u\\in C^2([0,1])$ satisfying \\eqref{steady_state}. To be more specific, we first seek solutions $u \\in C^2([0,b]\\cup[c,1])$ of \\eqref{steady_state} and subsequently extend them to functions in $C^2([0,1])$. A convenient way to construct a $C^2$-extension of $u$ on $[b,c]$ is through a quintic polynomial. Its coefficients are uniquely determined by the values of $u$, $u'$, and $u''$ at $b$ and $c$. However, this extension is not unique; there exist infinitely many $C^2$-functions on $[b,c]$ satisfying the same matching conditions. Moreover, if $u_1,u_2\\in\\mathcal{S}$ satisfy\n\\[\nu_1(x)=u_2(x), \\qquad x\\in [0,b]\\cup[c,1],\n\\]\nthen $u_1$ and $u_2$ belong to the same connected component of $\\mathcal{S}$. Indeed, since the two steady states coincide outside $[b,c]$, one can continuously deform $u_1$ into $u_2$ by varying only their values on $[b,c]$ while keeping the endpoint matching conditions at $b$ and $c$ unchanged.\n\nThe following lemma characterizes the connected components of $\\mcS$.\n\\begin{lem}[Characterization of connected components of $\\mathcal S$]\n\\label{lem:connected_components_S}\nLet $u_0,u_1\\in\\mathcal S$. Then $u_0$ and $u_1$ belong to the same\nconnected component of $\\mathcal S$ if and only if, for every\n\\[\n(s,\\hat s)\\in\n\\Bigl\\{\n\\tau\\bigl(u_0'(0),u_0'(1)\\bigr)\n+(1-\\tau)\\bigl(u_1'(0),u_1'(1)\\bigr):\n\\tau\\in[0,1]\n\\Bigr\\},\n\\]\nthe maximal solution of\n\\[\n\\begin{cases}\nu_{xx}-\\alpha u^\\delta u_x\n+\\beta u(1-u^\\delta)(u^\\delta-\\gamma)=0,\n\\\\\nu(0)=0,\\qquad u_x(0)=s,\n\\end{cases}\n\\]\nis defined on $[0,b]$, and the maximal solution of\n\\[\n\\begin{cases}\nu_{xx}-\\alpha u^\\delta u_x\n+\\beta u(1-u^\\delta)(u^\\delta-\\gamma)=0,\n\\\\\nu(1)=0,\\qquad u_x(1)=\\hat s,\n\\end{cases}\n\\]\nis defined on $[c,1]$.\n\\end{lem}\nThe proof of Lemma~\\ref{lem:connected_components_S} is similar to that of Lemma~3.1 in \\cite{Shirshendu20} and is therefore omitted.\n\n\\section{Approximate Controllability Between Steady States via Quasi-Static Deformation}\\label{QSD}\n\n\\subsection{Reduction of the problem}\nLet $\\epsilon>0,\\ \\tau\\in [0,1].$ Let $\\tau\\mapsto \\bar u(\\tau)$ be a $C^1$ path in $\\mcS,$ connecting $u_0$ and $u_1.$ Let us define $\\tau\\mapsto \\bar f(\\tau)$ by \n$$\\bar f(\\tau)( x):= \\alpha \\bar{u}^\\delta(\\tau, x) \\bar{u}_x(\\tau, x)-\\beta \\bar{u}(\\tau, x)(1-\\bar{u}^\\delta(\\tau, x))(\\bar{u}^\\delta(\\tau, x) -\\gamma)-\\bar{u}_{xx}(\\tau, x),$$\nfor $\\tau\\in[0,1]$ and $x\\in[0,1].$ Setting $\\tau=\\epsilon t,$ we have $\\tau\\in [0,1]$ if and only if $t\\in[0,1/{\\epsilon}].$ For $t\\in[0,1/{\\epsilon}]$ and $x\\in[0,1],$ let us define\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Intro_z_h}\n \\begin{cases}\n z(t, x) : = u(t, x)- \\bar{u}(\\epsilon t, x),\\\\\n h(t, x) : = f(t, x)- \\bar{f}(\\epsilon t, x). \n \\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nThanks to the time reparametrization introduced above, we can perform a pole-shifting procedure on the finite-dimensional linear system corresponding to the unstable part of the equation. A suitable feedback control, designed via pole placement, then stabilizes the full system.\n\nFor simplicity, we define $F:\\mathbb{R}\\to\\mathbb{R}$ by\n\\begin{align}\\label{Defn_of_F}\n F(v):= \\beta v(1-v^\\delta)(v^\\delta-\\gamma),\\quad v\\in \\mathbb{R}.\n\\end{align}\n Then a straightforward computation gives\n\\begin{align}\\label{Defn_F_prime}\n F^{\\prime}(v)=\\beta\\big[(1-v^{\\delta}) (v^{\\delta} -\\gamma)+\\delta v^{\\delta}(1-2v^{\\delta} +\\gamma)\\big],\\quad v\\in \\mathbb{R}.\n\\end{align}\nMoreover, since $F$ is a polynomial of degree $2\\delta+1$, a Taylor expansion \nwith integral remainder around $\\bar{v} \\in \\mathbb{R}$ yields, for every \n$\\bar{h} \\in \\mathbb{R}$,\n\\begin{align}\\label{Taylor_exp_F}\n F(\\bar{v}+\\bar{h}) - F(\\bar{v}) - F'(\\bar{v})\\bar{h} \n = \\bar{h}^{2}\\int_{0}^{1}(1-s)\\,F''(\\bar{v}+s\\bar{h})\\,ds.\n\\end{align}\nSince $F''$ is a polynomial of degree $2\\delta - 1$, there exists $C>0$, \ndepending only on the coefficients of $F$, such that\n\\begin{align}\\label{Fpp_growth}\n |F''(v)| \\leq C\\big(1+|v|^{2\\delta-1}\\big), \\qquad \\forall\\, v \\in \\mathbb{R}.\n\\end{align}\nHence, using $|\\bar{v}+s\\bar{h}| \\leq |\\bar{v}| + |\\bar{h}|$ for $s\\in[0,1]$ \ntogether with the elementary inequality $(a+b)^{k}\\lesssim a^{k}+b^{k}$ for \n$a,b\\geq 0$, we obtain\n\\begin{align*}\n \\sup_{s\\in[0,1]} \\big|F''(\\bar{v}+s\\bar{h})\\big| \n \\;\\lesssim\\; 1 + |\\bar{v}|^{2\\delta-1} + |\\bar{h}|^{2\\delta-1}.\n\\end{align*}\nCombining this with \\eqref{Taylor_exp_F}, we deduce that\n\\begin{align}\\label{Taylor_remainder_bound}\n \\big|F(\\bar{v}+\\bar{h}) - F(\\bar{v}) - F'(\\bar{v})\\bar{h}\\big| \n \\;\\lesssim\\; \\big(1+|\\bar{v}|^{2\\delta-1}\\big)|\\bar{h}|^{2} + |\\bar{h}|^{2\\delta+1},\n\\end{align}\nwhere the implicit constants depend only on $\\delta$ and on the coefficients of $F$.\n\nFrom \\eqref{cntrl_eqn}, \\eqref{steady_state}, and \\eqref{Intro_z_h}, we obtain \n\\begin{align*}\n z_t +\\epsilon \\bar{u}_{\\tau} & = (z_{xx}+\\bar{u}_{xx})-\\alpha (z+\\bar{u})^{\\delta}( z_x+\\bar{u}_x) + F(z+\\bar{u})\n -(\\bar{u}_{xx}-\\alpha \\bar{u}^{\\delta} \\bar{u}_x + F(\\bar{u})) \n +\\chi_{\\omega} h \\notag \\\\\n & = z_{xx}-\\alpha (z+\\bar{u})^{\\delta} z_x\n -\\alpha \\big((z+\\bar{u})^{\\delta}-\\bar{u}^{\\delta}\\big) \\bar{u}_x + F(z+\\bar{u})-F(\\bar{u}) +\\chi_{\\omega} h. \n\\end{align*}\n Further using the binomial expansion\n\\[\n(z+\\bar{u})^{\\delta}\n= \\bar{u}^{\\delta} +\\delta \\bar{u}^{\\delta-1} z+ \\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\binom{\\delta}{j} z^{j}\\bar{u}^{\\delta-j},\n\\]\n we deduce that:\n\\begin{align*}\n z_t &= z_{xx}-\\alpha\\bigg( \\bar{u}^{\\delta} +\\delta \\bar{u}^{\\delta-1} z+ \\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\binom{\\delta}{j} z^{j}\\bar{u}^{\\delta-j}\\bigg) z_x-\\alpha\\bigg(\\delta \\bar{u}^{\\delta-1} z+ \\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\binom{\\delta}{j} z^{j}\\bar{u}^{\\delta-j}\\bigg)\\bar{u}_x \\\\\n & \\qquad + F(z+\\bar{u})-F(\\bar{u}) +\\chi_{\\omega} h-\\epsilon \\bar{u}_{\\tau} \\\\\n &= z_{xx}-\\alpha \\bar{u}^{\\delta} z_x-\\alpha\\delta \\bar{u}^{\\delta-1}\\bar{u}_x z +F^{\\prime}(\\bar{u})z -\\alpha\\bigg(\\delta \\bar{u}^{\\delta-1} z+ \\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\binom{\\delta}{j} z^{j}\\bar{u}^{\\delta-j}\\bigg) z_x \\\\\n & \\qquad -\\alpha\\bigg(\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\binom{\\delta}{j} z^{j}\\bar{u}^{\\delta-j}\\bigg)\\bar{u}_x + \\big( F(z+\\bar{u})-F(\\bar{u})- F^{\\prime}(\\bar{u})z\\big) +\\chi_{\\omega} h - \\epsilon \\bar{u}_{\\tau}.\n\\end{align*}\n Thus, $z$ satisfies the following equation in $(0,T)\\times (0,1)$ with $T=1/\\epsilon,$\n\\begin{align}\\label{z_eqn}\n \\begin{cases}\n z_t =z_{xx}-\\alpha \\bar{u}^{\\delta} z_x-\\alpha\\delta \\bar{u}^{\\delta-1}\\bar{u}_x z +F^{\\prime}(\\bar{u})z-\\alpha\\big(\\delta \\bar{u}^{\\delta-1} z+ \\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\binom{\\delta}{j} z^{j}\\bar{u}^{\\delta-j}\\big) z_x \\\\\n \\qquad\\qquad-\\alpha\\big(\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\binom{\\delta}{j} z^{j}\\bar{u}^{\\delta-j}\\big)\\bar{u}_x + \\big( F(z+\\bar{u})-F(\\bar{u})- F^{\\prime}(\\bar{u})z\\big) \\\\\n \\qquad\\qquad +\\chi_{\\omega} h- \\epsilon \\bar{u}_{\\tau},\\;\\;\\; {\\text{in}} \\;\\; (0,T)\\times(0,1),\\\\\n z(t,0)=z(t,1)=0,\\;\\;\\;\\; t\\in(0,T),\\\\\n z(0,x)=0,\\;\\;\\;\\; x\\in (0,1).\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{align}\n\nWe introduce an one-parameter family of unbounded linear operators for $0\\leq \\tau \\leq 1$ $\\big(\\mcA(\\tau), \\mcD(\\mcA(\\tau))\\big)$ in $L^2(0,1)$ defined by\n$$ \\mcD(\\mcA(\\tau)):=H^1_0 (0,1)\\cap H^2(0,1),$$\n\\begin{align}\\label{Defn_A_tau}\n \\mcA(\\tau)(z):= z_{xx}+p(\\tau, \\cdot) z_x+q(\\tau, \\cdot)z,\n\\end{align}\nwith \n$$p(\\tau,\\cdot):=-\\alpha \\bar{u}^{\\delta}(\\tau, \\cdot),\\quad q(\\tau,\\cdot):= F^{\\prime}(\\bar{u}(\\tau, \\cdot))-\\alpha\\delta \\bar{u}^{\\delta-1}(\\tau, \\cdot)\\bar{u}_x(\\tau, \\cdot) ,$$\nand\n$$ F^{\\prime}(\\bar{u}(\\tau, \\cdot))= \\beta\\big[\\big(1-\\bar{u}^{\\delta}(\\tau, \\cdot)\\big) \\big(\\bar{u}^{\\delta}(\\tau, \\cdot) -\\gamma\\big)+\\delta \\bar{u}^{\\delta}(\\tau, \\cdot)\\big(1-2\\bar{u}^{\\delta}(\\tau, \\cdot) +\\gamma\\big)\\big].$$\n\n\\begin{remark}\\label{rem:p_q_u_regularity}\nSince $\\bar u\\in C^1\\big([0,1];C^2([0,1])\\big)$\nand $F$ is a polynomial, the coefficients\n\\[\np(\\tau,x)=-\\alpha \\bar u(\\tau,x)^\\delta \\quad \\text{and} \\quad q(\\tau,x)\n=\nF'(\\bar u(\\tau,x))\n-\\alpha\\delta \\bar u(\\tau,x)^{\\delta-1}\\bar u_x(\\tau,x)\n\\]\nsatisfy\n\\[\np\\in C^1\\big([0,1];C^2([0,1])\\big),\n\\qquad\nq\\in C^1\\big([0,1];C^1([0,1])\\big).\n\\]\nIn particular, $\\bar u,\\bar u_x,\\bar u_\\tau,p,q,p_\\tau$, and $q_\\tau$ are uniformly bounded on $[0,1]\\times[0,1]$.\n\\end{remark}\n\nNote that the domain $\\mcD(\\mcA(\\tau))$ of $\\mcA(\\tau)$ are same for all $\\tau \\in[0,1].$ Hence, from onward we denote $\\mcD(\\mcA(\\tau))$ by $\\mcD$ for all $\\tau\\in[0,1].$ Let $\\mathcal{B}:L^2(0,1)\\rightarrow L^2(0,1)$ be defined by $\\mathcal{B}(h):=\\chi_{\\omega}h$.\nThen \\eqref{z_eqn} can be rewritten as\n \\begin{align}\\label{z_eqn_in_operator_form}\n \\begin{cases}\n z_t(t, \\cdot)&=\\mcA(\\epsilon t)z(t, \\cdot)+\\mathcal{B}(h)(t)+\\mcR(\\epsilon, t, \\cdot), \\quad t\\in [0,1/\\epsilon]\\\\\n z(0)&=0,\n \\end{cases}\n \\end{align}\n where\n \\begin{align}\\label{Defn_R}\n \\mcR(\\epsilon, t, \\cdot):=& -\\alpha\\bigg(\\delta \\bar{u}^{\\delta-1} z+ \\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\binom{\\delta}{j} z^{j}\\bar{u}^{\\delta-j}\\bigg) z_x\n -\\alpha\\bigg(\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\binom{\\delta}{j} z^{j}\\bar{u}^{\\delta-j}\\bigg)\\bar{u}_x \\\\ \n & \\quad +\\big( F(z+\\bar{u})-F(\\bar{u})- F^{\\prime}(\\bar{u})z\\big) -\\epsilon \\bar{u}_{\\tau}(\\epsilon t). \\notag\n \\end{align}\n \nTo establish Theorem~\\ref{Main_thm}, it suffices to show that for a given neighborhood $\\mathcal{M}_0$ of $0$ in $L^2(0,1)$ and $\\epsilon>0$ sufficiently small, there exists a control $h\\in L^2(0,T;L^2(0,1))$ such that the corresponding solution $z$ of \\eqref{z_eqn} satisfies $z(T)\\in \\mathcal{M}_0$ with $T=1/\\epsilon$. To this end, we construct a suitable control function and a Lyapunov functional that stabilizes the system \\eqref{z_eqn}. It should be emphasized that the stabilization here is not in the usual sense (see~\\cite{coron2007}, Chapter 7, Section 7.1), since $t\\in [0,1/\\epsilon]$ rather than $t\\in [0,\\infty)$. \n\n\\subsection{Spectral analysis of the operator \\texorpdfstring{$\\mcA(\\tau)$}{A(tau)}}\\label{Spectral_Analysis_A}\nThe proof of Theorem~\\ref{Main_thm} relies on the spectral analysis of the operator defined in \\eqref{Defn_A_tau}. For $\\tau\\in[0,1]$, we study the eigenvalues of the operator $\\mcA(\\tau)$. To this end, we rewrite $\\mcA(\\tau)$ in Sturm--Liouville form as\n\\[\n\\mathcal{A}(\\tau)(z) = \\frac{1}{\\rho(\\tau,\\cdot)}\\big((\\rho(\\tau,\\cdot) z_x)_x + \\rho(\\tau,\\cdot) q(\\tau,\\cdot) z\\big),\n\\]\nwhere\n\\[\n\\rho(\\tau,x):=\\exp\\!\\left(\\int_0^x p(\\tau,s)\\,ds\\right), \\quad x\\in[0,1].\n\\]\nFor each $\\tau \\in [0,1]$, define the Hilbert space $\\mcH(\\tau) := L^2\\bigl( (0,1),\\ \\rho(\\tau,x)\\, dx \\bigr),$ equipped with the inner product\n$$\\langle z, w \\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} = \\int_0^1 z(x) {w(x)}\\, \\rho(\\tau,x)\\, dx$$\nand the corresponding norm\n$$\\|z\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)} = \\left( \\int_0^1 |z(x)|^2 \\rho(\\tau,x)\\, dx \\right)^{1/2}.$$\nWe call $\\mcH(\\tau)$ the weighted $L^2$ space with weight $\\rho(\\tau,\\cdot)$. Similarly, we define the corresponding Sobolev spaces\n$$\\mcH^1_0(\\tau) := H^1_0\\bigl( (0,1),\\ \\rho(\\tau,x)\\, dx \\bigr),$$\n\\[\n\\mcH^2(\\tau) := H^2\\bigl( (0,1),\\ \\rho(\\tau,x)\\, dx \\bigr).\n\\]\nendowed with the weighted norms\n\\[\n\\|z\\|_{\\mcH^1_0(\\tau)} := \\left(\\int_0^1 \\bigl(|z(x)|^2 + |z_x(x)|^2\\bigr)\\rho(\\tau,x)\\,dx\\right)^{1/2},\n\\]\nand\n\\[\n\\|z\\|_{\\mcH^2(\\tau)} := \\left(\\int_0^1 \\bigl(|z(x)|^2 + |z_x(x)|^2 + |z_{xx}(x)|^2\\bigr)\\rho(\\tau,x)\\,dx\\right)^{1/2}.\n\\]\nAs $p\\in C^1\\big([0,1]; C^2[0,1]\\big)$, there exist constants $0 < m_1 \\leq m_2 < \\infty$, such that\n\\[\nm_1 \\leq \\rho(\\tau,x) \\leq m_2 \\quad \\forall\\, \\tau\\in[0,1],\\ \\forall\\, x\\in[0,1].\n\\]\nConsequently, the weighted norms are uniformly equivalent to the standard norms, i.e.,\n\\begin{align}\\label{Norm_Equivalence}\n\\|\\cdot\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\sim \\|\\cdot\\|_{L^2(0,1)}, \\quad\n\\|\\cdot\\|_{\\mcH^1_0(\\tau)} \\sim \\|\\cdot\\|_{H^1_0(0,1)}, \\quad\n\\|\\cdot\\|_{\\mcH^2(\\tau)} \\sim \\|\\cdot\\|_{H^2(0,1)},\n\\end{align}\nuniformly for all $\\tau \\in [0,1]$.\n\n We consider the following eigenvalue problem\n\\begin{align}\\label{Eigenvalue_Problem}\n \\begin{cases}\n \\big(\\rho(\\tau,x)\\phi^{\\prime}(x)\\big)^{\\prime}+\\rho(\\tau,x)q(\\tau, x)\\phi(x)=\\lambda(\\tau)\\rho(\\tau,x) \\phi(x),\\quad \\text{in}\\quad (0,1),\\\\\n \\phi(0)=\\phi(1)=0.\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{align}\nThe following result is a consequence of the Sturm--Liouville theory (see \\cite{Coddington1955}).\n\\begin{thm}\\label{Cons_of_SLT}\nThe eigenvalues and the corresponding eigenfunctions of \n\\eqref{Eigenvalue_Problem} satisfy the following properties:\n\\begin{enumerate}\n\\item[(i)]\\label{First} For each $\\tau\\in[0,1]$, the eigenvalue problem \n\\eqref{Eigenvalue_Problem} has an infinite sequence of real eigenvalues which satisfy\n\\[\n\\lambda_1(\\tau)>\\lambda_2(\\tau)>\\cdots>\\lambda_k(\\tau)>\\lambda_{k+1}(\\tau)>\\cdots \\to -\\infty \\quad \\text{as } k\\to\\infty .\n\\]\n\\item[(ii)] For each $k\\in\\N$ and $\\tau\\in[0,1]$, the eigenvalue \n$\\lambda_k(\\tau)$ is simple and the corresponding eigenfunction \n$\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)$ can be chosen so that $\\{\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\}_{k\\in\\N}$\nforms an orthonormal basis of $\\mcH(\\tau)$. \n\\item[(iii)]\\label{Third} For each $k\\in\\N,$ the map $\\tau\\mapsto \\lambda_k(\\tau)$ is $C^1([0,1]),$ and the map $\\tau\\mapsto\\phi_k(\\tau, \\cdot)$ is $C^1([0,1]; L^2(0,1));$ see, e.g., \\cite{Kato1966}.\n\\item[(iv)] The operator $\\mcA(\\tau)$ is self-adjoint on $\\mcH(\\tau)$.\n\\end{enumerate}\n\\end{thm}\nUsing $(i)$ and $(iii)$, an application of Dini's theorem yields\n\\begin{align}\\label{Dini_yields}\n\\sup_{\\tau\\in[0,1]}\\lambda_k(\\tau)\\to -\\infty \\quad \\text{as } k\\to\\infty.\n\\end{align}\nIn view of \\eqref{Dini_yields}, the set $\\bigg\\{k\\in\\mathbb{N}_0:\\sup_{\\tau\\in[0,1]}\\lambda_k(\\tau)\\ge 0\\bigg\\}$ is finite.\nHence we can define\n\\begin{align}\\label{Defn_of_n}\n n:=\\max\\left\\{k\\in\\mathbb{N}_0:\\sup_{\\tau\\in[0,1]}\\lambda_k(\\tau)\\ge 0\\right\\}. \n\\end{align}\nConsequently, $\\sup_{\\tau\\in[0,1]}\\lambda_{n+1}(\\tau)<0$. Set $\\eta:=-\\sup_{\\tau\\in[0,1]}\\lambda_{n+1}(\\tau)>0$. Then, for every $k>n$, $\\sup_{\\tau\\in[0,1]}\\lambda_k(\\tau)\\le -\\eta<0$. Equivalently, for every $k>n$,\n\\begin{align}\\label{Lambda_k_less_eta}\n\\sup_{t\\in[0,1/\\epsilon]}\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)\\le -\\eta<0.\n\\end{align}\n\\subsection{Decomposition of the system into stable and unstable parts}\nLet $z(t,\\cdot)\\in \\mathcal{D}$ be a solution of \\eqref{z_eqn_in_operator_form}. Then $z(t,\\cdot)$ admits the following eigenfunction expansion:\n\\[\nz(t,\\cdot) = \\sum_{k=1}^\\infty z^{\\epsilon}_k(t)\\,\\phi_k(\\epsilon t, \\cdot),\n\\]\nwhere\n\\[\nz^{\\epsilon}_k(t):= \\int_0^1 z(t,x)\\,\\phi_k(\\epsilon t,x)\\,\\rho(\\epsilon t,x)\\,dx.\n\\]\n For simplicity of notation, we suppress the dependence on $\\epsilon$ and write $z_k^{\\epsilon}(t)\\equiv z_k(t)$. The same convention applies to other functions later on.\n \n Let $\\tau \\mapsto \\Pi(\\tau) \\in \\mathcal{L}(\\mcH(\\tau))$ be defined such that, for each $\\tau\\in[0,1]$, $\\Pi(\\tau)$ denotes the orthogonal projection onto the subspace $\\mathrm{span}\\{\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\}_{k=1}^n$ of $\\mcH(\\tau)$. More precisely, for $\\tau\\in[0,1]$ and $z\\in\\mcH$,\n\\begin{align}\\label{Pi_tau_z}\n \\Pi(\\tau) z=\\sum_{k=1}^n \\big\\langle z, \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\,\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot),\n\\end{align}\nIn the following lemma, we show that $\\Pi(\\tau)$ and $\\mathcal{A}(\\tau)$ commute.\n\\begin{lem}\\label{Commu_of_Pi_A}\n For each $\\tau\\in[0,1]$, the operators $\\Pi(\\tau)$ and $\\mcA(\\tau)$ commute.\n\\end{lem}\n\\begin{proof}\nWe see from \\eqref{Pi_tau_z} that for all $z\\in\\mcH(\\tau)$,\n \\begin{align*}\n \\mcA(\\tau) \\Pi(\\tau)z &= \\sum_{k=1}^n \\big\\langle z, \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\,\\mcA(\\tau)\\phi_k(\\tau, \\cdot) \\\\\n & =\\sum_{k=1}^n \\lambda_k(\\tau)\\big\\langle z, \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\,\\phi_k(\\tau, \\cdot)\\\\\n & =\\sum_{k=1}^n \\big\\langle z, \\lambda_k(\\tau)\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\,\\phi_k(\\tau, \\cdot)\\\\\n & =\\sum_{k=1}^n \\big\\langle z, \\mcA(\\tau)\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\,\\phi_k(\\tau, \\cdot)\\\\\n & =\\sum_{k=1}^n \\big\\langle \\mcA(\\tau)z, \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\,\\phi_k(\\tau, \\cdot)\\\\\n & =\\Pi(\\tau)\\mcA(\\tau)z.\n \\end{align*}\n This completes the proof of the lemma.\n\\end{proof}\nThe mapping $\\tau \\mapsto \\Pi(\\tau)$ is continuously differentiable. More precisely, we have the following result.\n\\begin{lem}\n Let $\\Pi$ be defined in \\eqref{Pi_tau_z}. Then, $\\Pi(\\cdot)\\in C^1\\big([0,1];\\mcL(L^2(0,1))\\big)$ and for each $\\tau\\in[0,1]$ and $z\\in \\mcH(\\tau)$, we have\n \\begin{align}\\label{Pi_prime_tau_z}\n {}\\qquad {}\\Pi^{\\prime}(\\tau)z = \\sum_{k=1}^n \\bigg\\langle z,\\, \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\bigg\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} & \\,\\frac{\\partial\\phi_k} {\\partial\\tau} (\\tau,\\cdot) + \\sum_{k=1}^n \\bigg\\langle z, \\frac{\\partial\\phi_k}{\\partial\\tau}(\\tau,\\cdot)\\bigg\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\,\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot) \\notag \\\\\n & + \\sum_{k=1}^n\n\\bigg\\langle\nz\\left(\\int_0^x p_\\tau(\\tau,s)\\,ds\\right),\n\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\n\\bigg\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\n\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot).\n \\end{align}\n\\end{lem}\n\\begin{proof}\n The proof follows from property~(iii) of Theorem~\\ref{Cons_of_SLT}.\n\\end{proof}\nLet us consider the $n$ dimensional subspace $V^{\\tau}_n=\\mathrm{span}\\{\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\}_{k=1}^n$ of $\\mcH(\\tau)$. We note that the projected component $\\Pi(\\tau)z(t,\\cdot)$ of $z(t,\\cdot)$ belongs to $V^{\\tau}_n$. We now derive the system of equations satisfied by the components\n\\begin{align}\\label{component_z_k}\nz_k(t)= \\big\\langle z(t,\\cdot), \\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}=\\int_0^1 z(t,x)\\,\\phi_k(\\epsilon t,x)\\,\\rho(\\epsilon t,x)\\,dx,\\quad k=1,2,\\ldots,n, \n\\end{align}\nof $\\Pi(\\tau)z(t,\\cdot)$.\n\\begin{lem}\n Let $n$ be as in \\eqref{Lambda_k_less_eta}. Let $\\epsilon>0$. For all $t\\in[0,1/{\\epsilon}]$, let $z(t,\\cdot)$ be the solution of \\eqref{z_eqn_in_operator_form} corresponding to a $h\\in L^2((0,T)\\times(0,1))$ which is of the form\n $$h(t,\\cdot)=\\sum_{k=1}^n h_k(t)\\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot),$$\n with $h_k\\in L^2(0,T)$ and let \n \\begin{align}\\label{Pi_epsilon_t_z}\n \\Pi(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)=\\sum_{k=1}^n z_k(t)\\,\\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot),\n \\end{align}\nwhere $z_k(t)$, $k=1,2,\\dots,n$, are given by \\eqref{component_z_k}. Then $z_k(t)$ satisfy \n \\begin{align}\\label{ODE_satisfied_by_z_k}\n \\frac{dz_k}{dt}(t) = \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t) z_k(t) + \\sum_{j=1}^n h_j(t) b_{j k}(\\epsilon t) + {r}_k(\\epsilon,t),\\quad k=1,\\dots,n,\n \\end{align}\nwhere, for $j,k=1,\\dots,n$, $b_{jk}(\\epsilon t)$ are given by\n $$ b_{jk}(\\epsilon t)= b_{kj}(\\epsilon t) = \\big\\langle \\chi_{\\omega} \\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot), \\phi_j(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} = \\int_{\\omega}\\phi_k(\\epsilon t,x) \\phi_j(\\epsilon t,x)\\rho(\\epsilon t,x) dx,$$\n and\n \\[\n {r}_k(\\epsilon,t) = \\left\\langle \\mathcal{R}^1(\\epsilon,t,\\cdot),\\ \\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) \\right\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}, \\quad k=1,\\dots,n,\n \\]\n and $\\mcR^{1}(\\epsilon, t, \\cdot)$ is given by\n \\begin{align}\\label{Defn_of_R1}\n \\mcR^{1}(\\epsilon, t, \\cdot) = \\Pi(\\epsilon t) \\mcR(\\epsilon, t, \\cdot)\n &+\\epsilon \\sum_{k=1}^n \\bigg\\langle z(t,\\cdot), \\frac{\\partial\\phi_k}{\\partial\\tau}(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\\bigg\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\,\\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) \\notag \\\\\n & +\\epsilon\\sum_{k=1}^n\\bigg\\langle z(t,\\cdot)\n\\left(\\int_0^x p_\\tau(\\epsilon t,s)\\,ds\\right),\n\\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\n\\bigg\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\n\\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot).\n \\end{align} \n\\end{lem}\n\\begin{proof}\n Differentiating \\eqref{Pi_epsilon_t_z} with respect to $t$ and using \\eqref{Pi_prime_tau_z}, \\eqref{z_eqn_in_operator_form} and Lemma~\\ref{Commu_of_Pi_A}, we have\n \\begin{align*}\n \\sum_{k=1}^n \\frac{dz_k}{dt}(t)\\,&\\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)+\\epsilon \\sum_{k=1}^n z_k(t)\\,\\frac{\\partial \\phi_k}{\\partial\\tau}(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) \\\\\n &= \\epsilon \\Pi^{\\prime}(\\epsilon t)z(t,\\cdot)+ \\Pi(\\epsilon t)z_t(t,\\cdot)\\\\\n &=\\epsilon \\sum_{k=1}^n \\big\\langle z(t,\\cdot), \\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\,\\frac{\\partial\\phi_k}{\\partial\\tau}(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) +\\epsilon \\sum_{k=1}^n \\bigg\\langle z(t,\\cdot), \\frac{\\partial\\phi_k}{\\partial\\tau}(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\\bigg\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\,\\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\\\\\n &\\qquad \\qquad \\, +\\sum_{k=1}^n \\bigg\\langle z\\left(\\int_0^x p_\\tau(\\tau,s)\\,ds\\right), \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot) \\bigg\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot) \\\\\n &\\qquad \\qquad \\qquad \\quad + \\mcA(\\epsilon t) \\Pi(\\epsilon t) z(t, \\cdot)+ \\Pi(\\epsilon t) \\mathcal{B}(h)(t)+ \\Pi(\\epsilon t) \\mcR(\\epsilon, t, \\cdot).\n \\end{align*}\n Thus,\n \\begin{align*}\n \\sum_{k=1}^n \\frac{dz_k}{dt}(t)\\,\\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)& = \\mcA(\\epsilon t) \\Pi(\\epsilon t) z(t, \\cdot)+ \\Pi(\\epsilon t) \\mathcal{B}(h)(t)+ \\Pi(\\epsilon t) \\mcR(\\epsilon, t, \\cdot) \\\\\n & \\quad \\qquad +\\epsilon \\sum_{k=1}^n \\bigg\\langle z(t,\\cdot), \\frac{\\partial\\phi_k}{\\partial\\tau}(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\\bigg\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\,\\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) \\\\\n &=\\sum_{k=1}^n \\lambda_k (\\epsilon t) z_k(t) \\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) + \\Pi(\\epsilon t) \\mathcal{B}(h)(t)+ \\Pi(\\epsilon t) \\mcR(\\epsilon, t, \\cdot) \\\\\n & \\quad \\qquad +\\epsilon \\sum_{k=1}^n \\bigg\\langle z(t,\\cdot), \\frac{\\partial\\phi_k}{\\partial\\tau}(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\\bigg\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\,\\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot).\n \\end{align*}\n Further in view of \\eqref{Defn_of_R1}, we can write\n \\begin{align}\\label{dz_k_dt_Phi_k}\n \\sum_{k=1}^n \\frac{dz_k}{dt}(t)\\,\\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) = \\sum_{k=1}^n \\lambda_k (\\epsilon t) z_k(t) \\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) + \\Pi(\\epsilon t) \\mathcal{B}(h)(t) + \\mcR^{1}(\\epsilon, t, \\cdot),\n \\end{align}\n We now compute $\\Pi(\\tau)\\mathcal{B}(h)(t)$:\n \\begin{align*}\n \\Pi(\\tau) \\mathcal{B}(h)(t) & = \\Pi(\\tau)\\chi_{\\omega}h(t,\\cdot) = \\Pi(\\tau)\\sum_{k=1}^n h_k(t) \\chi_{\\omega} \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\\\\n & = \\sum_{k=1}^n h_k(t) \\Pi(\\tau) \\big(\\chi_{\\omega} \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\big) \\\\\n & = \\sum_{k=1}^n h_k(t) \\sum_{j=1}^n \\big\\langle \\chi_{\\omega} \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot), \\phi_j(\\tau,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\,\\phi_j(\\tau,\\cdot) \\\\\n & = \\sum_{k=1}^n \\sum_{j=1}^n h_k(t) \\big\\langle \\chi_{\\omega} \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot), \\phi_j(\\tau,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\,\\phi_j(\\tau,\\cdot) \\\\\n & = \\sum_{k=1}^n \\sum_{j=1}^n h_k(t) b_{kj}(\\tau)\\,\\phi_j(\\tau,\\cdot),\n \\end{align*}\n where, for $k,j=1,2,\\dots,n,$\n $$ b_{kj}(\\tau) := \\big\\langle \\chi_{\\omega} \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot), \\phi_j(\\tau,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} = \\int_{\\omega}\\phi_k(\\tau,x) \\phi_j(\\tau,x)\\rho(\\tau,x) dx = b_{jk}(\\tau).$$\n We introduce an operator $\\mathcal{B}_1\\in\\mcal{L}(\\mathbb{R}^n, V^\\tau_n)$ defined by\n \\begin{align}\\label{B_1_Tau_h}\n \\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)h=\\sum_{k=1}^n \\sum_{j=1}^n h_k(t) b_{kj}(\\tau)\\,\\phi_j(\\tau,\\cdot),\n \\end{align}\n for $h=(h_1,h_2,\\ldots,h_n)^{\\top}\\in \\R^n.$ Therefore, with respect to the basis $\\{\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\}_{k=1}^n$, the operator $\\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)$ can be represented by the symmetric $n\\times n$ matrix \n \\begin{align} \\label{B_1_Matrix} \n \\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)=\n \\begin{pmatrix}\nb_{11}(\\tau) & b_{21}(\\tau) & \\cdots & b_{n1}(\\tau) \\\\\nb_{12}(\\tau) & b_{22}(\\tau) & \\cdots & b_{n2}(\\tau) \\\\\n\\vdots & \\vdots & \\ddots & \\vdots \\\\\nb_{1n}(\\tau) & b_{2n}(\\tau) & \\cdots & b_{nn}(\\tau)\n \\end{pmatrix}.\n \\end{align}\n Substituting \\eqref{B_1_Tau_h} in the equation \\eqref{dz_k_dt_Phi_k}, we have\n\\begin{align*}\n \\sum_{k=1}^n \\frac{dz_k}{dt}(t)\\,\\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) = \\sum_{k=1}^n \\lambda_k (\\epsilon t) z_k(t) \\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) + \\sum_{k=1}^n \\sum_{j=1}^n h_k(t) b_{kj}(\\epsilon t)\\,\\phi_j(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) + \\mcR^{1}(\\epsilon, t, \\cdot).\n \\end{align*}\n Projecting the above system onto each $\\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)$ yields \\eqref{ODE_satisfied_by_z_k}. Thus, the result follows.\n\\end{proof}\n\nLet us denote\n\\[\n\tX_1(t):= \\begin{pmatrix} \n\t\t z_{1}(t)\\\\\n\t\t z_{2}(t)\\\\\n\t\t \\vdots \\\\\n\t\t z_{n}(t) \n\t\\end{pmatrix},\\\n\t\\mcA_{1}(\\tau):= \\begin{pmatrix} \n\t\t \\lambda_{1}(\\tau) & 0 & \\dots & 0\\\\\n\t\t 0 & \\lambda_{2}(\\tau) & \\dots & 0\\\\\n\t\t \\vdots & \\vdots & \\ddots & \\vdots \\\\\n\t\t 0 & 0 & \\dots & \\lambda_{n}(\\tau)\n\t\\end{pmatrix},\\\n \\mathcal{R}_1(\\epsilon,t):= \\begin{pmatrix} \n\t\t r_{1}(\\epsilon,t)\\\\\n\t\t r_{2}(\\epsilon,t)\\\\\n\t\t \\vdots \\\\\n\t\t r_{n}(\\epsilon,t) \n\t\\end{pmatrix}.\n\\]\nTherefore, system \\eqref{ODE_satisfied_by_z_k} can be written as\n\\begin{align}\\label{ODE_X_1}\n \\frac{dX_1}{dt}(t)=\\mcA_{1}(\\epsilon t) X_1(t)+\\mathcal{B}_1(\\epsilon t) h(t)+\\mcR_1(\\epsilon,t).\n\\end{align}\n Let $I_n$ denote the identity matrix of size $n\\times n$. We denote by\n\\[\n\\big[\\lambda I_n-\\mathcal A_1(\\tau)\\;\\;\\mathcal B_1(\\tau)\\big]\n\\]\nthe $n\\times 2n$ matrix\n\\[\n\\left(\n\\begin{array}{cccccccc}\n\\lambda-\\lambda_1(\\tau) & 0 & \\cdots & 0\n& b_{11}(\\tau) & b_{21}(\\tau) & \\cdots & b_{n1}(\\tau) \\\\[1mm]\n\n0 & \\lambda-\\lambda_2(\\tau) & \\cdots & 0\n& b_{12}(\\tau) & b_{22}(\\tau) & \\cdots & b_{n2}(\\tau) \\\\[1mm]\n\n\\vdots & \\vdots & \\ddots & \\vdots\n& \\vdots & \\vdots & \\ddots & \\vdots \\\\[1mm]\n\n0 & 0 & \\cdots & \\lambda-\\lambda_n(\\tau)\n& b_{1n}(\\tau) & b_{2n}(\\tau) & \\cdots & b_{nn}(\\tau)\n\\end{array}\n\\right).\n\\]\nTo study the controllability of the system \\eqref{ODE_X_1}, we recall the following Theorem.\n\n\\begin{thm}[\\cite{Liu10}, Theorem 3.5]{Popov-Belevitch-Hautus test:}\\label{PBH_test}\n\t\tFor each $\\tau\\in[0,1],$ the pair $(\\mcA_1(\\tau),\\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau))$ is controllable if and only if the matrix $\\big[\\lambda I_n - \\mcA_1(\\tau)\\ \\ \\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)\\big]$ has rank $n$ for all complex numbers $\\lambda$. \n\t\\end{thm}\n We denote $\\mathcal{H}(\\tau)(\\omega):=L^2(\\omega,\\rho(\\tau,x)\\,dx)$. The following lemma shows that the matrix $\\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)$ is invertible.\n\\begin{lem}\nFor each $\\tau\\in[0,1],$ the matrix $\\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)$ defined in \\eqref{B_1_Matrix} is invertible.\n\\end{lem}\n\\begin{proof}\n We begin by showing that the family $\\{\\phi_{k}(\\tau,\\cdot)\\}_{k=1}^n$ is linearly independent in $\\mathcal{H}(\\tau)(\\omega)$. To prove this, we give an argument by reduction to absurdity. Suppose that the family $\\{\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\}_{k=1}^n$ is linearly dependent in $\\mathcal{H}(\\tau)(\\omega).$ Hence, without loss of generality we can assume that $$\\phi_n(\\tau,\\cdot)= \\sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \\gamma_k \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot) \\quad \\text{on} ~ \\omega,\\ \\text{where}\\ \\gamma_k \\not=0\\ \\text{for some}\\ k\\in\\{0,1,\\ldots,n-1\\}.$$ Consequently,\n \\begin{align*}\n \\sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \\lambda_n(\\tau)\\gamma_k \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot) = \\lambda_n(\\tau) \\phi_n(\\tau,\\cdot) = \\mcA(\\tau)\\phi_n(\\tau,\\cdot) \n =\\mcA(\\tau) \\sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \\gamma_k \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot) \\\\ \n =\\sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \\gamma_k \\mcA(\\tau) \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)=\\sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \\gamma_k\\lambda_k(\\tau)\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\quad \\text{on} \\ \\omega,\n \\end{align*}\n implying that\n \\begin{align*} \n \\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}\\gamma_k\\big(\\lambda_k(\\tau)-\\lambda_n(\\tau)\\big) \\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot) = 0\\quad \\text{on}\\ \\omega.\n \\end{align*}\t\n\t\t Recalling that $(\\lambda_k-\\lambda_n)>0$ for $k= 1, 2,\\ldots, n-1$. Thus, in this way, we conclude that there is at least one $\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)$ such that $\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)=0$ on $\\omega$. By the unique continuation property of the solutions to elliptic equations, this forces $\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)=0$ on $(0,1),$ which contradicts the nontriviality of eigenfunctions. Hence, the family $\\{\\phi_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\}_{k=1}^n$ is linearly independent in $\\mcH^\\tau(\\omega)$. This yields $\\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)$ is invertible because it is a Gram matrix. \n\\end{proof}\n\nWe now verify the Popov--Belevitch--Hautus criterion stated in Theorem~\\ref{PBH_test}.\n\n\\begin{thm}\nLet $\\tau\\in[0,1]$. Then, for all $\\lambda\\in\\mathbb{C}$, the matrix\n$\\big[\\lambda I_n - \\mcA_1(\\tau)\\ \\ \\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)\\big]$ has rank $n$.\n{}\n\\end{thm}\n\\begin{proof}\nLet $\\tau\\in[0,1]$ and $\\lambda\\in\\mathbb{C}$. Since $\\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)$ is invertible, we have\n\\[\n\\mathrm{rank}\\big(\\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)\\big)=n.\n\\]\nMoreover, the matrix \n\\[\n\\big[\\lambda I_n - \\mathcal{A}_1(\\tau)\\ \\ \\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)\\big]\n\\]\nhas $n$ rows. Hence,\n\\[\nn = \\mathrm{rank}\\big(\\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)\\big) \n\\leq \\mathrm{rank}\\big[\\lambda I_n - \\mathcal{A}_1(\\tau)\\ \\ \\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)\\big] \n\\leq n.\n\\]\nTherefore,\n\\[\n\\mathrm{rank}\\big[\\lambda I_n - \\mathcal{A}_1(\\tau)\\ \\ \\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)\\big] = n,\n\\]\nwhich completes the proof.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\begin{remark}\n For finite-dimensional linear autonomous control systems, stabilizability follows from the Popov-Belevitch-Hautus (PBH) condition, which is equivalent to the controllability. In contrast, this property does not generally hold for non-autonomous linear systems. Nevertheless, the implication remains valid in the class of slowly time-varying systems, where the small parameter $\\epsilon$ plays a crucial role.\n\\end{remark}\n\nAs a result, the system possesses the smoothly varying pole-shifting property.(see~\\cite{khalil02}).\n\n\\begin{cor}\\label{Pole_placement}\nLet $\\tau\\in[0,1]$. Then there exist $k_1(\\tau), k_2(\\tau),\\dots, k_n(\\tau)$ such that the matrix \n$\\mathcal{A}_1(\\tau)+\\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)\\mathcal{K}_1(\\tau)$ admits $-1$ as an eigenvalue of algebraic multiplicity $n$, where $\\mathcal{K}_1(\\tau)$ is the $n\\times n$ diagonal matrix\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mathcal{K}_1(\\tau)=\n\\begin{pmatrix} \nk_{1}(\\tau) & 0 & \\cdots & 0\\\\\n0 & k_{2}(\\tau) & \\cdots & 0\\\\\n\\vdots & \\vdots & \\ddots & \\vdots \\\\\n0 & 0 & \\cdots & k_{n}(\\tau)\n\\end{pmatrix}.\n\\end{align*}\nMoreover, there exists a $C^1$ map $\\tau\\mapsto P(\\tau)$ on $[0,1]$, where $P(\\tau)$ is a real symmetric positive definite $n\\times n$ matrix such that the following identity \n\\begin{align}\\label{Identity_Lyapunov}\n P(\\tau)\\bigg( \\mathcal{A}_1(\\tau)+\\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)\\mathcal{K}_1(\\tau)\\bigg)+ \\bigg(\\mathcal{A}_1(\\tau)+\\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)\\mathcal{K}_1(\\tau)\\bigg)^*P(\\tau)=-I_n,\n\\end{align}\nholds for all $\\tau\\in[0,1].$\n\\end{cor}\n\nThe matrix $\\mathcal{K}_1(\\tau)$, obtained in Corollary~\\ref{Pole_placement}, helps us to construct the state feedback control function $h(t)$ of the form\n\\begin{align}\\label{Feedback_law}\n h(t)=\\mathcal{K}_1(\\epsilon t) X_1(t),\\quad t\\in [0,1/\\epsilon]\n\\end{align}\nand stabilizes the finite dimensional linear control system\n\\begin{align*}\n \\frac{dX_1}{dt}(t)=\\mcA_{1}(\\epsilon t) X_1(t)+\\mathcal{B}_1(\\epsilon t) h(t).\n\\end{align*}\n\nSubsequently, we will show that the same feedback law \\eqref{Feedback_law}, stabilizes the full infinite-dimensional system \\eqref{z_eqn_in_operator_form}, provided $\\epsilon$ is chosen sufficiently small, which will assist us in formulating a suitable Lyapunov functional to achieve stabilization of that system.\n\\subsection{Existence, uniqueness, and regularity}\nLet $T>0$. In this subsection, we study the existence, uniqueness, and regularity of solutions to the closed-loop system \n \\begin{align}\\label{Close_loop_z_eqn}\n \\begin{cases}\n z_t(t, \\cdot)&=\\mcA(\\epsilon t)z(t, \\cdot)+\\mathcal{B}\\mathcal{K}_1(\\epsilon t)\\Pi(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)+\\mcF(z(t,\\cdot)),\\quad \\text{in}\\,\\ (0,T),\\\\\n z(0)&=0,\n \\end{cases}\n \\end{align}\nwhere\n\\begin{align}\n \\mcF(z(t,\\cdot))=& -\\alpha\\bigg(\\delta \\bar{u}^{\\delta-1} z+ \\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\binom{\\delta}{j} z^{j}\\bar{u}^{\\delta-j}\\bigg) z_x\n -\\alpha\\bigg(\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\binom{\\delta}{j} z^{j}\\bar{u}^{\\delta-j}\\bigg)\\bar{u}_x \\\\ \n & \\quad +\\big( F(z+\\bar{u})-F(\\bar{u})- F^{\\prime}(\\bar{u})z\\big) -\\epsilon \\bar{u}_{\\tau}(\\epsilon t). \\notag\n \\end{align}\nThis system~\\eqref{Close_loop_z_eqn} is obtained from \\eqref{z_eqn_in_operator_form} by replacing the control $h(t)$ with the feedback control\n\\begin{align}\\label{Feedback}\nh(t)=\\mathcal{K}_1(\\epsilon t)\\Pi(\\epsilon t)z(t,\\cdot).\n\\end{align}\nThe regularity established here will be used in the next section to construct a suitable Lyapunov functional.\n\nNote that $$\\mathcal{B}\\mathcal{K}_1(\\tau)\\Pi(\\tau) z(t,\\cdot) = \\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)\\mathcal{K}_1(\\tau)\\Pi(\\tau) z(t,\\cdot).$$\nWe now compute the matrix product $\\mathcal{B}_1(\\tau)\\mathcal{K}_1(\\tau)$ explicitly. Since $\\mathcal{K}_1(\\tau)$ is a diagonal matrix, a direct computation yields\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mathcal B_1(\\tau)\\mathcal K_1(\\tau)\n=\n\\begin{pmatrix}\nb_{11}(\\tau)k_1(\\tau) & b_{21}(\\tau)k_2(\\tau) & \\cdots & b_{n1}(\\tau)k_n(\\tau) \\\\\nb_{12}(\\tau)k_1(\\tau) & b_{22}(\\tau)k_2(\\tau) & \\cdots & b_{n2}(\\tau)k_n(\\tau) \\\\\n\\vdots & \\vdots & \\ddots & \\vdots \\\\\nb_{1n}(\\tau)k_1(\\tau) & b_{2n}(\\tau)k_2(\\tau) & \\cdots & b_{nn}(\\tau)k_n(\\tau)\n\\end{pmatrix}.\n\\end{align*}\n Hence, we obtain \n\\begin{align*}\n \\mathcal{B}\\mathcal{K}_1(\\tau)\\Pi(\\tau) z(t,\\cdot)=\\sum_{j=1}^n \\sum_{i=1}^n b_{ji}(\\tau)k_j(\\tau)z_j(t) \\phi_i(\\tau,\\cdot):=\\xi(\\tau)z(t,\\cdot),\n\\end{align*}\nwhere $\\xi(\\tau)$ is defined for $z\\in\\mcH(\\tau)$ by\n\\begin{align}\n \\xi(\\tau)z= \\sum_{j=1}^n\\sum_{i=1}^n b_{ji}(\\tau)k_j(\\tau)z_j(\\tau) \\phi_i(\\tau), \n\\end{align}\nwith $z=\\sum_{j=1}^{\\infty} z_j(\\tau)\\phi_j(\\tau)$. Set\n\\begin{align*}\nd_i(\\tau) := \\sum_{j=1}^n b_{ji}(\\tau)\\,k_j(\\tau)\\,z_j(\\tau).\n\\end{align*}\nThen\n\\begin{align*}\n\\xi(\\tau)z\n&= \\sum_{i=1}^n d_i(\\tau)\\,\\phi_i(\\tau).\n\\end{align*}\nSince $\\{\\phi_i(\\tau)\\}_{i=1}^n$ is an orthonormal family in $\\mcH(\\tau)$, we obtain\n\\begin{align*}\n\\|\\xi(\\tau)z\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\n=\\sum_{i=1}^n |d_i(\\tau)|^2 &=\n\\sum_{i=1}^n \\bigg|\\sum_{j=1}^n b_{ji}(\\tau)\\,k_j(\\tau)\\,z_j(\\tau)\\bigg|^2 \\\\\n&\\leq C \\sum_{j=1}^n |z_j(\\tau)|^2 \\leq C \\|z\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}.\n\\end{align*}\nThus, $\\xi(\\tau)\\in\\mcL\\big(\\mcH(\\tau)\\big).$\n\n\\begin{remark}\nSince the mappings\n$$\n\\tau\\longmapsto \\phi_i(\\tau,\\cdot)\n\\quad\\text{in }H_0^1(0,1),\n\\qquad\n\\tau\\longmapsto b_{ji}(\\tau),\n\\qquad\n\\tau\\longmapsto k_j(\\tau)\n$$\nare of class $C^1$, and the coordinate functionals\n$$\n\\tau\\longmapsto\n\\bigl\\langle\\,\\cdot\\,,\\phi_j(\\tau,\\cdot)\\bigr\\rangle_{\\mathcal H(\\tau)}\n$$\nbelong to\n$$\nC^1\\bigl([0,1];(L^2(0,1))^*\\bigr),\n$$\nthe finite-rank representation\n$$\n\\xi(\\tau)z\n=\n\\sum_{i,j=1}^{n}\nb_{ji}(\\tau)k_j(\\tau)\n\\bigl\\langle z,\\phi_j(\\tau,\\cdot)\\bigr\\rangle_{\\mathcal H(\\tau)}\n\\phi_i(\\tau,\\cdot)\n$$\nimplies that\n$$\n\\xi\\in\nC^1\\left(\n[0,1];\n\\mathcal L\\bigl(L^2(0,1),H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr)\n\\right).\n$$\nConsequently, since $H_0^1(0,1)\\hookrightarrow L^2(0,1)$ continuously,\n$$\n\\xi\\in\nC^1\\left(\n[0,1];\n\\mathcal L\\bigl(L^2(0,1)\\bigr)\n\\right).\n$$\n\\end{remark}\n\n The closed-loop system \\eqref{Close_loop_z_eqn} can be written in terms of $\\xi$ as\n \\begin{align}\\label{Close_loop_z_eqn_in_Xi}\n \\begin{cases}\n z_t(t, \\cdot)&=\\mcA(\\epsilon t)z(t, \\cdot)+\\xi(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)+\\mcF(z(t,\\cdot)),\\quad \\text{in}\\,\\ (0,T),\\\\\n z(0)&=0.\n \\end{cases}\n \\end{align}\n Using \\eqref{Defn_A_tau}, above system \\eqref{Close_loop_z_eqn_in_Xi} can be rewritten as\n \\begin{align}\\label{Close_loop_z_eqn_expanded}\n \\begin{cases}\nz_t\n={}& z_{xx}\n-\\alpha \\bar u^\\delta(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\\,z_x\n+\\Big(\nF'(\\bar u(\\epsilon t,\\cdot))\n-\\alpha\\delta \\bar u^{\\delta-1}(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\n\\bar u_x(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\n+\\xi(\\epsilon t)\n\\Big)z\n\\\\\n&-\\alpha\\Bigg(\n\\delta \\bar u^{\\delta-1} z\n+\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\n\\binom{\\delta}{j}\nz^j\\bar u^{\\delta-j}\n\\Bigg)z_x\n-\\alpha\\Bigg(\n\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\n\\binom{\\delta}{j}\nz^j\\bar u^{\\delta-j}\n\\Bigg)\\bar u_x\n\\\\\n&+\\Big(\nF(z+\\bar u)-F(\\bar u)-F'(\\bar u)z\n\\Big)\n-\\epsilon \\bar u_\\tau(\\epsilon t,\\cdot), \\quad \\text{in}\\quad (0,T)\\times (0,1),\n \\\\\n z(t,0)&=z(t,1)=0, \\qquad t\\in (0,T), \\\\ \n z(0, x)& = 0, \\qquad x\\in (0,1). \n \\end{cases}\n\\end{align}\n\\begin{thm}\\label{Thm_Soln_Trans_sys}\nThe system \\eqref{Close_loop_z_eqn_in_Xi}, equivalently \\eqref{Close_loop_z_eqn}, admits a unique solution\n\n\\[\nz\\in\nL^2\\bigl(0,T;H^2(0,1)\\cap H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr)\n\\cap\nH^1\\bigl(0,T;L^2(0,1)\\bigr)\n\\cap\nC\\bigl([0,T];H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr).\n\\]\n\\end{thm}\nThe proof of Theorem~\\ref{Thm_Soln_Trans_sys} follows a similar strategy to that of Theorem~3.18 in \\cite{Shirshendu20} and is provided in the Appendix.\n\nLet us denote \\[\n\\mathcal{E}\n:=\n\\left\\{\nu\\in H^3(0,1):\nu(0)=u(1)=0,\\;\nu_{xx}(0)=u_{xx}(1)=0\n\\right\\}.\n\\]\nUsing the bootstrap argument, we have the following regularity result.\n\n\\begin{thm}\\label{Regularity_of_soln}\nLet $z(t,\\cdot)$ denote the solution to the closed-loop system \\eqref{Close_loop_z_eqn}. Then\n\\[\nz\\in\nL^2(0,T;\\mathcal{E})\n\\cap\nH^1\\bigl(0,T;H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr)\n\\cap\nC\\bigl([0,T];H^2(0,1)\\cap H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr).\n\\]\nIn particular,\n\\[\nz\\in L^2(0,T;H^3(0,1)),\n\\qquad\nz_t\\in L^2\\bigl(0,T;H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr),\n\\]\nand\n\\[\nz(t)\\in \\mcD(\\mathcal A(\\epsilon t))\n=\nH^2(0,1)\\cap H_0^1(0,1)\n\\]\nfor every $t\\in[0,T]$.\n\\end{thm}\n\nWe defer the proof of Theorem~\\ref{Regularity_of_soln} to the Appendix.\n\n\\begin{remark}\\label{rem:regularity_Lyapunov_functional}\nUnder the regularity established in Theorem~\\ref{Regularity_of_soln}, the Lyapunov functional $V$ defined in \\eqref{Lyapunov_Functional} is well-defined on $[0,T]$. Moreover, $V$ is absolutely continuous on $[0,T]$ and therefore belongs to $W^{1,1}(0,T)$. In particular, $V$ is continuous on $[0,T]$ and differentiable for almost every $t \\in (0,T)$.\n\\end{remark}\n\n\\subsection{Construction of Lyapunov functional}\nIn this subsection, we will construct a Lyapunov functional so that the system \\eqref{z_eqn_in_operator_form} should be stabilizable. Let $c>0$ (will be chosen later). For any $t\\in[0,1/{\\epsilon}]$ and $z(t,\\cdot)\\in \\mcD$ let us define \n\t\\begin{align}\\label{Lyapunov_Functional}\n\t\t V(t,z(t,\\cdot))&:= c\\Big(\\big\\langle P(\\epsilon t) X_1(t), X_1(t)\\big\\rangle_2\\Big)- \\frac{1}{2}\\big\\langle{z}(t,\\cdot), \\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)},\n\t\\end{align}\n where we denote $z_k(t)= \\big\\langle z(t,\\cdot), \\phi_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}$ for $k\\in \\mathbb{N}$ and\n $$ X_1(t):= \\begin{pmatrix} \n\t\t z_{1}(t)\\\\\n\t\t z_{2}(t)\\\\\n\t\t \\vdots \\\\\n\t\t z_{n}(t) \n\t\\end{pmatrix} \\in \\mathbb{R}^n.$$\n In particular we have\n \\begin{align}\\label{2nd_Lyapunov_Functional}\n\t\t V(t,z(t,\\cdot)):= c\\Big(\\big\\langle P(\\epsilon t) X_1(t), X_1(t)\\big\\rangle_2\\Big)- \\frac{1}{2}\\sum_{k=1}^\\infty \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t) z_k(t)^2.\n\t\\end{align}\n As $\\tau\\mapsto P(\\tau)$ is $C^1([0,1],\\mathbb{R}^{n\\times n})$ map and $P(\\tau)$ is real positive definite symmetric matrix, there exist positive constants $c_{11},c_{12}$ independent of $\\tau\\in[0,1]$ such that\n \\begin{align}\\label{c11_P_tau_c22_}\n c_{11}||X||_2^2\\leq \\langle P(\\tau) X, X\\rangle_2 \\leq c_{12}||X||_2^2,\\quad \\forall\\ X\\in \\mathbb{R}^{n}. \n \\end{align}\nThus, $$\\langle P(\\epsilon t) X_1(t), X_1(t)\\rangle_2\\sim ||X_1(t)||_2^2.$$\n By property $(iii)$ of Theorem~\\ref{Cons_of_SLT}, the maps $\\tau\\mapsto\\lambda_1(\\tau),\\ \\tau\\mapsto\\lambda_n(\\tau)$ are continuous. Therefore, they attain their extrema on $[0,1]$, and we set \n\\[\n\\bar{m}:=\\max_{\\tau\\in[0,1]}\\lambda_1(\\tau),\n\\qquad\nm:=\\min_{\\tau\\in[0,1]}\\lambda_n(\\tau).\n\\] \nThen for $t\\in[0,1/\\epsilon]$, we have\n\\begin{align*}\nm \\|X_1(t)\\|^2_2 \\leq \\sum_{k=1}^n \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t) z_k(t)^2 \\leq \\bar{m} \\|X_1(t)\\|^2_2.\n\\end{align*}\n Hence,\n \\begin{align*}\n m\\|X_1(t)\\|^2_2+ \\sum_{k=n+1}^\\infty \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t) z_k(t)^2 \\leq\\sum_{k=1}^\\infty \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t) z_k(t)^2 \\leq \\bar{m} \\|X_1(t)\\|^2_2 + \\sum_{k=n+1}^\\infty \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t) z_k(t)^2,\n\\end{align*}\nand therefore\n\\begin{align*}\n -\\frac{1}{2}\\bar{m} \\|X_1(t)\\|^2_2 - \\frac{1}{2}\\sum_{k=n+1}^\\infty \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t) z_k(t)^2\\leq & -\\frac{1}{2}\\sum_{k=1}^\\infty \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t) z_k(t)^2 \\\\\n \\leq & -\\frac{1}{2}m\\|X_1(t)\\|^2_2 -\\frac{1}{2} \\sum_{k=n+1}^\\infty \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t) z_k(t)^2.\n\\end{align*}\n In view of \\eqref{2nd_Lyapunov_Functional}, \\eqref{c11_P_tau_c22_}, and the above estimates, we obtain\n\\begin{align*}\n\t\t\\Big(c_{11}c-\\frac{1}{2}\\bar{m}\\Big)||X_1(t)||^2_2- \\frac{1}{2}\\sum_{k=n+1}^\\infty \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t) z_k(t)^2 \\leq V(t,z(t,\\cdot)), \n \\end{align*}\n and\n \\begin{align*}\n V(t,z(t,\\cdot)) \\leq \\Big(c_{12}c-\\frac{1}{2}m\\Big)||X_1(t)||^2_2- \\frac{1}{2}\\sum_{k=n+1}^\\infty \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t) z_k(t)^2. \n\t\\end{align*}\nThus, by choosing $c>0$ sufficiently large in the definition of $V$, we ensure that\n\\[\nc_{11}c-\\frac{\\bar{m}}{2}>0,\n\\qquad\nc_{12}c-\\frac{m}{2}>0.\n\\]\nHence\n\\begin{align}\\label{3rd_Lyapunov_functional}\n\t\t V(t,z(t,\\cdot)) \\sim \\|X_1(t)\\|^2_2 - \\sum_{k=n+1}^\\infty \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t) z_k(t)^2.\n\t\\end{align}\nIn particular, since $\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)\\le -\\eta<0$ for all $k>n$, it follows that\n$V(t,z(t,\\cdot))$ is positive definite.\n\\begin{lem}\n Let $V$ be defined by \\eqref{Lyapunov_Functional}. Then, for all $t\\in[0,1/\\epsilon]$ and for $z(t,\\cdot)\\in\\mcD$, one has\n \\begin{align}\\label{V_sim_z_H_1}\n V(t,z(t,\\cdot))\\sim \\|z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH^1_0(\\tau)}.\n\\end{align}\n Moreover,\n \\begin{align}\\label{V_lessim_A_X_1}\n V(t,z(t,\\cdot))\\lesssim \\|X_1(t)\\|^2_2+\\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t)z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}. \n \\end{align}\n\\end{lem}\n\\begin{proof}\nUsing the definition of the operator $\\mcA(\\epsilon t)$, we have\n\\begin{align*}\n\\big\\langle{z}(t,\\cdot),\\, \\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} & = \\bigg\\langle{z}(t,\\cdot),\\, \\frac{1}{\\rho(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)}\\bigg(\\big(\\rho(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) z_x(t,\\cdot)\\big)_x + \\rho(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) q(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) z(t,\\cdot)\\bigg)\\bigg\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\\\\n&= \\int_0^1 \\bigg(z(t,x) \\,\\big(\\rho(\\epsilon t,x) z_x(t,x)\\big)_x + \\rho(\\epsilon t,x) q(\\epsilon t,x) z^2(t,x)\\bigg)\\, dx \\\\\n&= -\\|z_x(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)} + \\int_0^1 q(\\epsilon t,x) \\rho(\\epsilon t,x) z^2(t,x)\\, dx.\n\\end{align*}\nThus, we have\n\\begin{align}\\label{A_tau_Integration_by_Parts}\n -\\big\\langle{z}(t,\\cdot),\\, \\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} = \\|z_x(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)} - \\int_0^1 q(\\epsilon t,x) \\rho(\\epsilon t,x) z^2(t,x)\\, dx.\n\\end{align}\nAs $q(\\tau,\\cdot)$ and $\\rho(\\tau,\\cdot)$ are uniformly bounded with respect to $\\tau$, we obtain\n% Applying the Cauchy--Schwarz inequality, we get\n\\begin{align*}\n -\\big\\langle{z}(t,\\cdot),\\, \\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\lesssim \\|z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH^1_0(\\tau)}. \n\\end{align*}\nHence, we have\n\\begin{align}\\label{V_lessim_z_H}\n\t\t V(t,z(t,\\cdot))&:= c\\Big(\\big\\langle P(\\epsilon t) X_1(t), X_1(t)\\big\\rangle_2\\Big)- \\frac{1}{2}\\big\\langle{z}(t,\\cdot), \\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\lesssim \\|z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH^1_0(\\tau)}.\n\t\\end{align}\nFrom \\eqref{A_tau_Integration_by_Parts}, we have\n\\begin{align*}\n \\|z_x(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)} &= -\\big\\langle{z}(t,\\cdot),\\, \\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} + \\int_0^1 q(\\epsilon t,x) \\rho(\\epsilon t,x) z^2(t,x)\\, dx \\\\ \n &= -\\sum_{k=1}^{\\infty} \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)z_k(t)^2 + \\int_0^1 q(\\epsilon t,x) \\rho(\\epsilon t,x) z^2(t,x)\\, dx \\\\ \n &\\leq -\\sum_{k=1}^{\\infty} \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)z_k(t)^2 + \\|q\\|_{\\infty}\\int_0^1 \\rho(\\epsilon t,x) z^2(t,x)\\, dx. \\\\ \n &=-\\sum_{k=1}^{\\infty} \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)z_k(t)^2 + \\|q\\|_{\\infty}\\|z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\\\ \n &=-\\sum_{k=1}^{\\infty} \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)z_k(t)^2 + \\|q\\|_{\\infty}\\sum_{k=1}^{\\infty}z_k(t)^2 \\\\ \n &=\\bigg(-\\sum_{k=1}^{n} \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)z_k(t)^2 + \\|q\\|_{\\infty}\\sum_{k=1}^{n}z_k(t)^2\\bigg) \\\\ \n &\\qquad \\qquad \\qquad \\qquad + \\bigg(-\\sum_{k=n+1}^{\\infty} \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)z_k(t)^2 + \\|q\\|_{\\infty}\\sum_{k=n+1}^{\\infty}z_k(t)^2\\bigg).\n\\end{align*}\nTherefore, we have\n\\begin{align}\\label{z_x_less_estimate}\n \\|z_x(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}+\\|z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)} &\\leq \\bigg(-\\sum_{k=1}^{n} \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)z_k(t)^2 + (\\|q\\|_{\\infty}+1)\\sum_{k=1}^{n}z_k(t)^2\\bigg) \\\\ \n &\\qquad + \\bigg(-\\sum_{k=n+1}^{\\infty} \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)z_k(t)^2 + (\\|q\\|_{\\infty}+1)\\sum_{k=n+1}^{\\infty}z_k(t)^2\\bigg). \n\\end{align}\nBy continuity of the map $\\tau\\mapsto\\lambda_k(\\tau)$ on the compact interval $[0,1]$, there exists $M>0$ such that \n $$|\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)|\\leq M \\quad \\forall\\ k=1,2,\\dots,n,\\quad \\forall\\ t\\in [0,1/{\\epsilon}].$$\nThus, we have\n\\begin{align}\\label{Finite_part_estimate}\n \\bigg(-\\sum_{k=1}^{n} \\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)z_k(t)^2 + (\\|q\\|_{\\infty}+1)\\sum_{k=1}^{n}z_k(t)^2\\bigg)\\leq (M+\\|q\\|_{\\infty}+1)\\sum_{k=1}^{n}z_k(t)^2. \n\\end{align}\nAs $\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)\\le -\\eta<0$ for all $k>n$ and $t\\in[0,1/\\epsilon]$, it follows that\n\\[\n-\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)\\ge \\eta,\n\\qquad \\forall\\, k>n.\n\\]\nHence,\n\\[\nz_k(t)^2\n\\le\n\\frac{1}{\\eta}\\,\\big(-\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)\\big)\\,z_k(t)^2,\n\\qquad \\forall\\, k>n.\n\\]\nSumming over $k=n+1,\\dots$, we obtain\n\\[\n\\sum_{k=n+1}^{\\infty} z_k(t)^2\n\\le\n\\frac{1}{\\eta}\n\\sum_{k=n+1}^{\\infty}\n\\big(-\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)\\big)\\,z_k(t)^2.\n\\]\nTherefore,\n\\[\n(\\|q\\|_{\\infty}+1)\\sum_{k=n+1}^{\\infty} z_k(t)^2\n\\le\n\\frac{(\\|q\\|_{\\infty}+1)}{\\eta}\n\\sum_{k=n+1}^{\\infty}\n\\big(-\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)\\big)\\,z_k(t)^2.\n\\]\nConsequently,\n\\begin{align}\\label{Infinite_part_estimate}\n\\bigg(-\\sum_{k=n+1}^{\\infty}\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)z_k(t)^2\n+& \\notag\n(\\|q\\|_{\\infty}+1)\\sum_{k=n+1}^{\\infty} z_k(t)^2\\bigg) \\\\\n& \\leq \\bigg(1+\\frac{(\\|q\\|_{\\infty}+1)}{\\eta}\\bigg)\\bigg(-\\sum_{k=n+1}^{\\infty}\n\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)\\,z_k(t)^2\\bigg).\n\\end{align}\nUsing \\eqref{Finite_part_estimate} and \\eqref{Infinite_part_estimate} in \\eqref{z_x_less_estimate}, we obtain\n\\begin{align*}\n \\|z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH^1_0(\\tau)} &\\leq (M+\\|q\\|_{\\infty})\\sum_{k=1}^{n}z_k(t)^2 + \\bigg(1+\\frac{\\|q\\|_{\\infty}}{\\eta}\\bigg)\\bigg(-\\sum_{k=n+1}^{\\infty}\n\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)\\,z_k(t)^2\\bigg) \\\\\n&\\lesssim \\sum_{k=1}^{n}z_k(t)^2 - \\sum_{k=n+1}^{\\infty}\n\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)\\,z_k(t)^2 \\\\\n&= \\|X_1(t)\\|^2_2- \\sum_{k=n+1}^{\\infty}\n\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)\\,z_k(t)^2.\n\\end{align*}\nThus in view of \\eqref{3rd_Lyapunov_functional}, we get\n\\begin{align}\\label{z_H_lessim_V}\n \\|z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH^1_0(\\tau)}\\lesssim V(t,z(t,\\cdot)),\\qquad \\forall\\, t \\in [0,1/\\epsilon]. \n\\end{align}\nCombining \\eqref{V_lessim_z_H} and \\eqref{z_H_lessim_V}, we obtain \\eqref{V_sim_z_H_1}. Next, using the fact that\n\\[\n-\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)\\le \\frac{1}{\\eta}\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)^2,\n\\qquad \\forall\\, k>n,\n\\]\nwe obtain\n\\begin{align}\\label{Eta_A_z}\n-\\sum_{k=n+1}^{\\infty}\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)z_k(t)^2\n\\leq\n\\frac{1}{\\eta}\\sum_{k=n+1}^{\\infty}\\lambda_k(\\epsilon t)^2 z_k(t)^2\n\\leq\n\\frac{1}{\\eta}\\|\\mathcal A(\\epsilon t)z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2.\n\\end{align}\nHence \\eqref{V_lessim_A_X_1} follows from \\eqref{3rd_Lyapunov_functional} and \\eqref{Eta_A_z}.\n\\end{proof}\nLet $z(t,\\cdot)$ denote the solution to the closed-loop system \\eqref{Close_loop_z_eqn} on $[0,1/\\epsilon]$. For simplicity, let us denote\n$$V_1(t):=V(t,z(t,\\cdot)) = c\\Big(\\big\\langle P(\\epsilon t) X_1(t), X_1(t)\\big\\rangle_2\\Big)- \\frac{1}{2}\\big\\langle{z}(t,\\cdot), \\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}.$$\nNext, we compute $\\frac{d}{dt}V_1(t)$ and establish the differential inequality satisfied by $V_1(t)$.\n\\begin{lem}\\label{Diff_ineq_lem}\n Let $z(t,\\cdot)$ denote the solution to the closed-loop system \\eqref{Close_loop_z_eqn} on $[0,1/\\epsilon]$. Then, there exists $\\epsilon_0>0$ such that, for every $0<\\epsilon<\\epsilon_0,$ the functional $V_1(t)$ satisfies the following differential inequality\n \\begin{align}\\label{d_dt_V1_t_lessim_1}\n \\frac{d}{dt}V_1(t) + \\hat{p} V_1(t) \n \\lesssim \\Big(V_1(t)^2&+V_1(t)^{{\\delta+1}} \n + V_1(t)^{{\\delta}} + V_1(t)^{2\\delta+1}\\Big)+\\epsilon^2 \\notag \\\\\n & + \\Big(V_1(t)^{\\frac{3}{2}}+V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta+2}{2}} + V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta+1}{2}} \\Big),\n\\end{align}\nfor some constant $\\hat{p}>0,$ independent of $\\epsilon\\in(0,\\epsilon_0).$\n\\end{lem}\n\\begin{proof}\nIn view of Theorem~\\ref{Regularity_of_soln}, differentiating $V_1(t)$ with respect to $t$ yields\n\\begin{align}\\label{d_dt_V1_t}\n \\frac{d}{dt}V_1(t)= c\\Big(&2\\big\\langle P(\\epsilon t) X_1(t), X^{\\prime}_1(t)\\big\\rangle_2 + \\epsilon\\big\\langle P^{\\prime}(\\epsilon t) X_1(t), X_1(t)\\big\\rangle_2 \\Big) - \\frac{1}{2}\\Lambda(t),\n\\end{align}\nwhere \n\\begin{align*}\n \\Lambda(t):&=\\frac{d}{dt}\\big\\langle{z}(t,\\cdot), \\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\\\ \n &= 2\\big\\langle{z_t}(t,\\cdot), \\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \n +\\epsilon \\big\\langle{z}(t,\\cdot), \\mcA^{\\prime}(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\\\ \n & \\qquad \\qquad +\\epsilon \\int_0^1 z(t,x)\\,[\\mcA(\\epsilon t)z(t,\\cdot)](x)\\,\\rho(\\epsilon t,x)\n\\left(\\int_0^x p_{\\tau}(\\epsilon t,s)\\,ds\\right)\\,dx.\n\\end{align*}\n\nUsing \\eqref{Close_loop_z_eqn}, we obtain\n\\begin{align*}\n\\big\\langle z_t(t,\\cdot),\\mcA(\\epsilon t)z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \n&= \\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}+ \\big\\langle\\mathcal{B} \\mathcal{K}_1(\\epsilon t) X_1(t),\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\\\\n &\\qquad \\qquad + \\big\\langle \\mcR(\\epsilon,t,\\cdot), \\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}.\n\\end{align*}\nFurther in view of \\eqref{Defn_A_tau}, we have\n\\begin{align*}\n \\big\\langle{z}(t,\\cdot), \\mcA^{\\prime}(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} = \\big\\langle{z}(t,\\cdot), p_\\tau(\\epsilon t, \\cdot) z_x(t,\\cdot) +q_\\tau(\\epsilon t, \\cdot)z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}.\n\\end{align*}\nHence,\n\\begin{align}\\label{Defn_Big_Lambda}\n \\Lambda(t)&= 2\\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}+ 2\\big\\langle\\mathcal{B} \\mathcal{K}_1(\\epsilon t) X_1(t),\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\notag \\\\\n &\\quad +2 \\big\\langle \\mcR(\\epsilon,t,\\cdot), \\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \n +\\epsilon \\big\\langle{z}(t,\\cdot), p_\\tau(\\epsilon t, \\cdot) z_x(t,\\cdot) +q_\\tau(\\epsilon t, \\cdot)z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\notag \\\\ \n & \\qquad +\\epsilon \\int_0^1 z(t,x)\\,[\\mcA(\\epsilon t)z(t,\\cdot)](x)\\,\\rho(\\epsilon t,x)\n\\left(\\int_0^x p_{\\tau}(\\epsilon t,s)\\,ds\\right)\\,dx.\n\\end{align}\nFrom \\eqref{ODE_X_1}, \\eqref{Feedback_law}, and \\eqref{Identity_Lyapunov}, we infer\n\\begin{align}\\label{P_X1_X1_prime}\n 2 \\big\\langle P(\\epsilon t) X_1(t), X^{\\prime}_1(t)\\big\\rangle_2 = -\\|X_1(t)\\|^2_2+2\\big\\langle P(\\epsilon t) X_1(t), \\mcR_1(\\epsilon,t)\\big\\rangle_2.\n\\end{align}\nSubstituting \\eqref{Defn_Big_Lambda} and \\eqref{P_X1_X1_prime} into \\eqref{d_dt_V1_t}, we obtain\n\\begin{align}\\label{d_dt_V1_t_equal}\n \\frac{d}{dt}V_1(t) = &-c\\|X_1(t)\\|^2_2-\\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\n - \\big\\langle\\mathcal{B} \\mathcal{K}_1(\\epsilon t) X_1(t),\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\notag \\\\\n &- \\big\\langle \\mcR(\\epsilon,t,\\cdot), \\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} +2c\\big\\langle P(\\epsilon t) X_1(t), \\mcR_1(\\epsilon,t)\\big\\rangle_2 \\notag \\\\ \n &+ c\\epsilon\\big\\langle P^{\\prime}(\\epsilon t) X_1(t), X_1(t)\\big\\rangle_2 \n -\\frac{\\epsilon}{2} \\big\\langle{z}(t,\\cdot), p_\\tau(\\epsilon t, \\cdot) z_x(t,\\cdot) +q_\\tau(\\epsilon t, \\cdot)z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\notag \\\\ \n & -\\frac{\\epsilon}{2} \\int_0^1 z(t,x)\\,[\\mcA(\\epsilon t)z(t,\\cdot)](x)\\,\\rho(\\epsilon t,x)\n\\left(\\int_0^x p_{\\tau}(\\epsilon t,s)\\,ds\\right)\\,dx.\n\\end{align}\nWe now estimate the terms on the right-hand side of \\eqref{d_dt_V1_t_equal} one by one. \nApplying the Cauchy--Schwarz and Young's inequality, we infer that\n\\begin{align}\\label{BK1_X1_Az_estimate}\n \\big|\\big\\langle\\mathcal{B} \\mathcal{K}_1(\\epsilon t) X_1(t),\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\big|&\\leq\\|\\mathcal{B} \\mathcal{K}_1(\\epsilon t) X_1(t)\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\notag \\\\\n &\\leq 2\\|\\mathcal{B} \\mathcal{K}_1(\\epsilon t) X_1(t)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}+\\frac{1}{8} \\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\notag \\\\\n &\\leq M_1\\|X_1(t)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}+\\frac{1}{8} \\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)},\n\\end{align}\nfor some $M_1>0.$ By \\eqref{Defn_R} and the Cauchy--Schwarz inequality, we have\n\\begin{align}\\label{R_A_z_estimate}\n \\Big|\\big\\langle \\mcR(\\epsilon,t,&\\cdot), \\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\Big| \\notag \\\\\n &\\leq \\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\Bigg[\\alpha\\bigg\\|\\bigg(\\delta \\bar{u}^{\\delta-1} z+ \\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\binom{\\delta}{j} z^{j}\\bar{u}^{\\delta-j}\\bigg) z_x\\bigg\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\notag \\\\\n & \\qquad \\qquad \\qquad \\qquad \\quad + \\alpha\\bigg\\|\\bigg(\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\binom{\\delta}{j} z^{j}\\bar{u}^{\\delta-j}\\bigg)\\bar{u}_x\\bigg\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\notag \\\\ \n & \\qquad \\qquad \\qquad \\qquad \\quad +\\big\\|\\big( F(z+\\bar{u})-F(\\bar{u})- F^{\\prime}(\\bar{u})z\\big)\\big\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\Bigg] \\notag \\\\\n &\\qquad \\qquad \\qquad \\qquad \\quad +\\epsilon\\Big|\\big\\langle \\bar{u}_{\\tau}(\\epsilon t), \\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\Big|.\n\\end{align}\nWe further estimate each term on the right-hand side of \\eqref{R_A_z_estimate} separately. \n\nUsing \\eqref{Norm_Equivalence} together with the continuous embedding $H_0^1(0,1)\\hookrightarrow L^\\infty(0,1)$, we obtain that\n\\[\n\\mathcal{H}_0^1(\\tau) \\hookrightarrow L^\\infty(0,1)\n\\]\ncontinuously and uniformly with respect to $\\tau \\in [0,1]$. Therefore, using this embedding and the uniform boundedness of $\\bar{u}$, we get\n\\begin{align*}\n \\bigg\\|\\bigg(\\delta \\bar{u}^{\\delta-1} z+ \\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\binom{\\delta}{j} z^{j}\\bar{u}^{\\delta-j}\\bigg) z_x\\bigg\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)}&\\leq \\bigg\\|\\delta \\bar{u}^{\\delta-1} z+ \\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\binom{\\delta}{j} z^{j}\\bar{u}^{\\delta-j}\\bigg\\|_{L^\\infty} \\big\\| z_x\\big\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\\\\n &\\lesssim \\left(\n\\|z\\|_{L^\\infty}\n+\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\|z\\|_{L^\\infty}^{\\,j}\n\\right)\\|z_x\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\\\\n&\\lesssim \\left(\n\\|z\\|_{\\mcH^1_0(\\tau)}\n+\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\|z\\|_{\\mcH^1_0(\\tau)}^{\\,j}\n\\right)\\|z\\|_{\\mcH^1_0(\\tau)} \\\\\n&=\\|z\\|_{\\mcH_0^1(\\tau)}^2\n\\left(\n1+\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\|z\\|_{\\mcH_0^1(\\tau)}^{\\,j-1}\n\\right) \\\\\n& \\lesssim \\|z\\|_{\\mcH_0^1(\\tau)}^2\n\\Big(1+\\|z\\|_{\\mcH_0^1(\\tau)}^{\\delta-1}\\Big) \\\\\n& \\lesssim V_1(t)\\Big(1+V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta-1}{2}}\\Big).\n\\end{align*}\n\nUsing the uniform boundedness of $\\bar{u}_x$, we have\n\n\\begin{align*}\n\\bigg\\|\n\\bigg(\n\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\\binom{\\delta}{j} z^{j}\\bar{u}^{\\delta-j}\n\\bigg)\\bar{u}_x\n\\bigg\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\n\\lesssim\n\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\n\\|z^j\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \n&\\lesssim\n\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\n\\|z\\|_{L^\\infty}^{j-1}\\|z\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\\\\n&\\lesssim\n\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\n\\|z\\|_{\\mcH_0^1(\\tau)}^{j} \\\\\n&\\lesssim\n\\|z\\|_{\\mcH_0^1(\\tau)}^2\n\\left(\n1+\\|z\\|_{\\mcH_0^1(\\tau)}^{\\delta-2}\n\\right) \\\\\n&\\lesssim\nV_1(t)\\left(\n1+V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta-2}{2}}\n\\right).\n\\end{align*}\n\nFurther, applying \\eqref{Taylor_remainder_bound} pointwise with $\\bar v=\\bar u(\\epsilon t,x)$ and $\\bar h=z(t,x)$, we obtain\n\n\\begin{align*}\n \\big\\|\\big( F(z+\\bar{u})-F(\\bar{u})- F^{\\prime}(\\bar{u})z\\big)\\big\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\lesssim \\|z(t,\\cdot)\\|_\\infty^2 + \\|z(t,\\cdot)\\|_\\infty^{2\\delta+1} \\lesssim V_1(t) + V_1(t)^{\\frac{2\\delta+1}{2}}.\n\\end{align*}\n\nUsing the uniform boundedness of $\\bar{u}_\\tau$, we obtain\n\\begin{align*}\n \\epsilon\\big|\\big\\langle \\bar{u}_{\\tau}(\\epsilon t), \\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\big|\\lesssim \\epsilon \\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)}.\n\\end{align*}\n\nThus, we have\n\\begin{align}\\label{R_A_z_estimate2}\n \\big|\\big\\langle \\mcR(\\epsilon,t,&\\cdot), \\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\big| \\notag \\\\ \n &\\lesssim \\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\bigg( V_1(t)\\Big( 1+V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta-1}{2}} + V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta-2}{2}} + V_1(t)^{\\frac{2\\delta -1}{2}}\\Big)+\\epsilon \\bigg).\n\\end{align}\nIn view of Corollary~\\ref{Pole_placement} and the estimate\n\\[\n\\|X_1(t)\\|_2^2 \\le \\|z(t,\\cdot)\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)}^2 \\lesssim V_1(t),\n\\]\nwe obtain\n\\begin{align}\\label{P_R1_estimate}\n |2c\\big\\langle P(\\epsilon t) X_1(t), & \\mcR_1(\\epsilon,t)\\big\\rangle_2| \\notag \\\\\n &\\lesssim c\\|X_1(t)\\|_2 \\|\\mcR_1(\\epsilon,t)\\|_{2} \\notag \\\\\n &\\lesssim c\\|X_1(t)\\|_2\\Big(\\|\\mcR(\\epsilon,t,\\cdot)\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)}+\\epsilon \\|z(t,\\cdot)\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\Big) \\notag \\\\\n &\\lesssim c\\sqrt{V_1(t)}\n\\bigg[\nV_1(t)\\Big(\n1\n+V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta-1}{2}}\n+V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta-2}{2}}\n+V_1(t)^{\\frac{2\\delta-1}{2}}\n\\Big)\n+\\epsilon\\big(1+V_1(t)^{\\frac12}\\big)\n\\bigg].\n\\end{align}\nBy Corollary~\\ref{Pole_placement}, there exists a constant $C_2>0$ such that\n\\[\n\\|P^{\\prime}(\\epsilon t)\\| \\le C_2, \\qquad \\forall\\, t\\in[0,1/\\epsilon].\n\\]\nHence,\n\\begin{align}\\label{P_prime__X1_estimate}\n \\big|c\\epsilon\\big\\langle P^{\\prime}(\\epsilon t) X_1(t), X_1(t)\\big\\rangle_2\\big|\\lesssim c\\epsilon \\|X_1(t)\\|^2_2\\lesssim c\\epsilon V_1(t).\n\\end{align}\nUsing the fact that $p_\\tau$ and $q_\\tau$ are uniformly bounded, we have\n\\begin{align}\\label{z_p_tau_q_tau_estimate}\n \\Big| \\frac{\\epsilon}{2} \\big\\langle{z}&(t,\\cdot), p_\\tau(\\epsilon t, \\cdot) z_x(t,\\cdot) +q_\\tau(\\epsilon t, \\cdot)z(t,\\cdot)\\big\\rangle_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\Big| \\notag \\\\\n &\\lesssim \\epsilon\\Big(\\|z(t,\\cdot)\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\|z_x(t,\\cdot)\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)}+\\|z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\Big)\n \\lesssim \\epsilon \\|z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH^1_0(\\tau)} \\lesssim \\epsilon V_1(t).\n\\end{align}\nFinally, we estimate the last integral term as follows:\n\\begin{align}\\label{Integral_estimate}\n \\bigg|\\frac{\\epsilon}{2} \\int_0^1 z(t,x)\\,[\\mcA(\\epsilon t)z(t,\\cdot)](x)\\,&\\rho(\\epsilon t,x)\n\\left(\\int_0^x p_{\\tau}(\\epsilon t,s)\\,ds\\right)\\,dx \\bigg| \\notag \\\\\n&\\lesssim \\epsilon \\int_0^1\\big| z(t,x)\\,[\\mcA(\\epsilon t)z(t,\\cdot)](x)\\big|\\,\\rho(\\epsilon t,x)\\, dx \\notag \\\\\n&\\lesssim \\epsilon\\Big(\\|z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}+\\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t)z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\Big) \\notag \\\\\n&\\lesssim \\epsilon\\Big(V_1(t)+\\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t)z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}\\Big).\n\\end{align}\nUsing the estimates \\eqref{BK1_X1_Az_estimate}, \\eqref{R_A_z_estimate2}, \\eqref{P_R1_estimate}, \\eqref{P_prime__X1_estimate}, \\eqref{z_p_tau_q_tau_estimate}, and \\eqref{Integral_estimate} in \\eqref{d_dt_V1_t_equal}, we obtain\n\\begin{align}\\label{d_dt_V1_t_lessim}\n \\frac{d}{dt} & V_1(t) +\\big(c-M_1\\big)\\|X_1(t)\\|^2_2+\\Big(\\frac{7}{8}-C\\epsilon\\Big) \\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\notag \\\\ \n &\\leq C\\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\Big(V_1(t)+V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta+1}{2}} \n + V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta}{2}} + V_1(t)^{\\frac{2\\delta+1}{2}}\\Big)+C\\epsilon \\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\notag \\\\\n &\\qquad \\quad + C c\\Big(\\epsilon\\sqrt{V_1(t)} + V_1(t)^{\\frac{3}{2}}+V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta+2}{2}} + V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta+1}{2}} + V_1(t)^{\\delta+1}\\Big) +2 C(c+1)\\epsilon V_1(t), \n\\end{align}\nwhere $C>0$ is some constant.\nBy Young’s inequality, for any $\\theta>0,$ we have\n\\begin{align*}\n \\epsilon \\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)}&\\leq C_{\\theta}\\epsilon^2 + \\frac{\\theta}{2} \\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}, \\\\\n \\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|_{\\mcH(\\tau)} &\\Big(V_1(t)+V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta+1}{2}} \n + V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta}{2}} + V_1(t)^{\\frac{2\\delta+1}{2}} \\Big) \\\\ \n &\\leq \\frac{\\theta}{2} \\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}+ 4 C_{\\theta}\\Big(V_1(t)^2+V_1(t)^{{\\delta+1}} \n + V_1(t)^{{\\delta}} + V_1(t)^{2\\delta+1}\\Big), \\\\\n \\epsilon\\sqrt{V_1(t)}&\\leq \\frac{\\theta}{2} V_1(t)+C_{\\theta}\\epsilon^2.\n\\end{align*}\nEmploying the above estimates in \\eqref{d_dt_V1_t_lessim} yields\n\\begin{align}\\label{d_dt_V1_t_lessim_}\n \\frac{d}{dt}V_1(t) &+\\big(c-M_1\\big)\\|X_1(t)\\|^2_2+\\Big(\\frac{7}{8}-C\\epsilon-C\\theta \\Big) \\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)} \\notag \\\\ \n &\\leq 4 C C_{\\theta} \\Big(V_1(t)^2+V_1(t)^{{\\delta+1}} \n + V_1(t)^{{\\delta}} +V_1(t)^{2\\delta+1} \\Big)+C C_{\\theta}(1+c)\\epsilon^2+ \\frac{1}{2}C c\\theta V_1(t) \\notag \\\\\n &\\qquad \\quad + C c\\Big(V_1(t)^{\\frac{3}{2}}+V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta+2}{2}} + V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta+1}{2}} + V_1(t)^{\\delta+1} \\Big) + 2C(c+1)\\epsilon V_1(t).\n\\end{align} \nWe choose $c>0$ sufficiently large such that $c - M_1 > \\tfrac{7}{8}$, and $\\theta>0$, $\\epsilon>0$ sufficiently small so that $\\tfrac{7}{8} - C\\epsilon - C\\theta > 0$. Hence, using \\eqref{V_lessim_A_X_1}, we obtain\n\\begin{align*}\n \\Big(\\frac{7}{8}-C\\epsilon-C\\theta \\Big) V_1(t) \\lesssim \\big(c-M_1\\big)\\|X_1(t)\\|^2_2+\\Big(\\frac{7}{8}-C\\epsilon-C\\theta \\Big) \\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}. \n\\end{align*}\nHence, there exists a constant $M_2>0$ such that\n\\begin{align*}\n M_2 \\Big(\\frac{7}{8}-C\\epsilon-C\\theta \\Big) V_1(t) \\leq \\big(c-M_1\\big)\\|X_1(t)\\|^2_2+\\Big(\\frac{7}{8}-C\\epsilon-C\\theta \\Big) \\|\\mcA(\\epsilon t) z(t,\\cdot)\\|^2_{\\mcH(\\tau)}. \n\\end{align*}\nUsing the above inequality in \\eqref{d_dt_V1_t_lessim_}, and moving the terms\n$\\frac12 Cc\\theta V_1(t)$ and $C(c+2)\\epsilon V_1(t)$\nto the left-hand side, we obtain \n\\begin{align}\\label{d_dt_V1_t_lessim_2}\n \\frac{d}{dt}V_1(t) &+\\bigg( M_2 \\Big(\\frac{7}{8}-C\\epsilon-C\\theta \\Big)-\\frac{1}{2}C c\\theta- 2C(c+1)\\epsilon \\bigg) V_1(t) \\\\ \n & \\, \\leq 4C C_{\\theta} \\Big(V_1(t)^2+V_1(t)^{{\\delta+1}} \n + V_1(t)^{{\\delta}} + V_1(t)^{2\\delta+1}\\Big)+C C_{\\theta}(1+c)\\epsilon^2 \\notag \\\\\n &\\qquad \\qquad \\qquad \\,\\, + C c\\Big(V_1(t)^{\\frac{3}{2}}+V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta+2}{2}} + V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta+1}{2}} +V_1(t)^{\\delta+1} \\Big) .\n\\end{align}\nChoose $\\epsilon_0>0$ and $\\theta>0$ sufficiently small such that $$\\hat{p}:= M_2 \\Big(\\frac{7}{8}-C \\epsilon_0-C\\theta \\Big)-\\frac{1}{2}C c\\theta-2C(c+1)\\epsilon_0 >0.$$ \nThen, for every $0<\\epsilon<\\epsilon_0,$ \n$$M_2 \\Big(\\frac{7}{8}-C \\epsilon-C\\theta \\Big)-\\frac{1}{2}C c\\theta-2C(c+1)\\epsilon \\geq \\hat{p}.$$\nHence, \\eqref{d_dt_V1_t_lessim_1} follows. This completes the proof.\n\\end{proof}\n\\begin{lem}\\label{smallness_0f_z}\nLet $\\epsilon \\in (0,\\epsilon_0)$ be sufficiently small as in the proof of Lemma~\\ref{Diff_ineq_lem}, and let $z(t,\\cdot)$ be the solution of \\eqref{z_eqn_in_operator_form}. Then there exists a constant $C_3 > 0$, independent of $\\epsilon$, such that\n\\begin{align}\\label{z_1_by_epsilon}\n\\|z(t)\\|_{H^1_0(0,1)} \\le C_3\\, \\epsilon \\quad \\forall\\, t \\in \\left[0, \\frac{1}{\\epsilon}\\right].\n\\end{align}\n\\end{lem}\n\\begin{proof}\nFrom Lemma~\\ref{Diff_ineq_lem}, there exists a constant $C_4>0$ such that\n\\begin{align}\\label{d_dt_V1_t_leq_C}\n \\frac{d}{dt} & V_1(t) + \\hat{p} V_1(t) \\notag \\\\ \n & \\leq C_4 \\Big(V_1(t)^2+V_1(t)^{{\\delta+1}} \n + V_1(t)^{{\\delta}} +V_1(t)^{\\frac{3}{2}}+V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta+2}{2}} + V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta+1}{2}} +V_1(t)^{2\\delta+1} + \\epsilon^2 \\Big) \\notag \\\\\n\\end{align}\nLet $0<\\nu<\\min \\big\\{1, (\\frac{\\hat{p}}{14C_4})^2\\big\\}$ be a constant. Using $V_1(0)=0$ and the continuity of the map $t \\mapsto V_1(t)$, there exists $t_0\\in(0,1/\\epsilon]$ such that\n\\begin{align} \nV_1(t) < \\nu \\quad \\text{for all } t \\in [0, t_0).\n\\end{align}\nWe claim that \n\\begin{align}\\label{V_1_less_nu}\nV_1(t) < \\nu \\quad \\text{for all } t \\in [0, 1/\\epsilon]\n\\end{align}\n Indeed, if not, since $t\\mapsto V_1(t)$ is continuous, there exists $T^*\\in (0,1/\\epsilon]$ such that\n \\begin{align}\\label{There_exists_T*_positive}\n V_1(t)<\\nu,\\quad \\forall \\ 0 \\leq t < T^*,\\ \\text{and}\\ V_1(T^*) = \\nu.\n \\end{align}\nIn view of \\eqref{There_exists_T*_positive}, it follows that for all $t\\in[0,T^*)$,\n\\begin{align*}\n \\Big(V_1(t)^2+V_1(t)^{{\\delta+1}} \n + V_1(t)^{{\\delta}}\n + V_1(t)^{\\frac{3}{2}}+V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta+2}{2}} + V_1(t)^{\\frac{\\delta+1}{2}} + V_1(t)^{2\\delta+1}\\Big)\\leq 7\\nu^{1/2}V_1(t).\n\\end{align*}\nSubstituting the above estimate into \\eqref{d_dt_V1_t_leq_C}, we obtain\n\\begin{align}\n \\frac{d}{dt}V_1(t) + \\hat{p} V_1(t) \\leq 7 C_{4}\\nu^{1/2}V_1(t)+C_{4}\\epsilon^2.\n\\end{align}\nThe above inequality can be rewritten as\n\\begin{align}\n \\frac{d}{dt}V_1(t) + \\big(\\hat{p}- 7C_{4}\\nu^{1/2}\\big) V_1(t) \\leq C_{4} \\epsilon^2.\n\\end{align}\n As $0<\\nu<\\min \\big\\{1, (\\frac{\\hat{p}}{14C_{4}})^2\\big\\}$, it follows that $7C_{4}\\nu^{1/2} < \\frac{\\hat{p}}{2}$. Then, for all $t \\in [0,T^*)$, we have\n\\begin{align}\\label{Simplified_diff_ineq}\n \\frac{d}{dt}V_1(t) + \\frac{\\hat{p}}{2} V_1(t) \\leq C_{4} \\epsilon^2.\n\\end{align}\n Integrating \\eqref{Simplified_diff_ineq} over $[0,T^*]$ and using $V_1(0)=0$ yields\n \\[\nV_1(T^*)\\leq \\frac{2C_{4}}{\\hat{p}}\\epsilon^2\n\\left(1-e^{-\\frac{\\hat{p}}{2}T^*}\\right) < \\frac{2C_{4}}{\\hat{p}}\\epsilon^2<\\frac{\\epsilon^2}{\\sqrt{\\nu}}.\n\\]\nChoose $\\epsilon>0$ small enough so that $\\epsilon<\\nu^{3/4}.$ Thus, we have\n$$V_1(T^*)<\\nu,$$\nwhich contradicts \\eqref{There_exists_T*_positive}. Therefore \\eqref{V_1_less_nu} holds. Consequently, \\eqref{Simplified_diff_ineq} holds on the whole interval $[0,1/\\epsilon]$. Integrating it over $[0,t]$, we obtain\n\\begin{align}\\label{V_1_less_epsilon2}\n V_1(t) \\le \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{\\nu}}\\epsilon^2, \\quad \\forall\\, t \\in \\left[0, \\frac{1}{\\epsilon}\\right].\n\\end{align}\nThus, \\eqref{z_1_by_epsilon} follows from \\eqref{V_sim_z_H_1}, \\eqref{Norm_Equivalence}, and \\eqref{V_1_less_epsilon2}.\n\\end{proof}\n\nWe are now in a position to prove the main theorem.\n\\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\\ref{Main_thm}]\nLet $\\hat\\delta>0$ be given, as in the statement of Theorem~\\ref{Main_thm}.\nBy Lemma~\\ref{smallness_0f_z}, there exists $\\epsilon_0^*>0$ such that, for every $0<\\epsilon\\le\\epsilon_0^*$, the solution $z$ of \\eqref{Close_loop_z_eqn}, or equivalently of \\eqref{Close_loop_z_eqn_in_Xi}, satisfies\n\\[\n\\|z(t)\\|_{H_0^1(0,1)} \\le C_3\\,\\epsilon \\qquad \\text{for all } t\\in\\Big[0,\\tfrac{1}{\\epsilon}\\Big].\n\\]\n\nSet\n\\[\nT_{\\hat\\delta} := \\max\\left\\{ \\frac{C_3}{\\hat\\delta},\\ \\frac{1}{\\epsilon_0^*} \\right\\}.\n\\]\nLet $T \\ge T_{\\hat\\delta}$ be arbitrary, and set $\\epsilon := \\dfrac1T$. Then\n\\[\n0 < \\epsilon \\le \\epsilon_0^* \\qquad \\text{and} \\qquad C_3\\,\\epsilon = \\frac{C_3}{T} \\le \\frac{C_3}{T_{\\hat\\delta}} \\le \\hat\\delta.\n\\]\nIn particular, since $\\epsilon T = 1$, the time $T$ lies at the right endpoint $\\frac1\\epsilon$ of the validity interval for Lemma~\\ref{smallness_0f_z}, so the lemma gives\n$$\\|z(T)\\|_{H_0^1(0,1)} \\le C_3\\,\\epsilon \\le \\hat\\delta.$$\nRecalling that $z(t) = u(t) - \\bar u(\\epsilon t)$ (see \\eqref{Intro_z_h}) and that $\\bar u(\\epsilon T) = \\bar u(1) = u_1$, we obtain\n$$\\|u(T) - u_1\\|_{L^2(0,1)} \\le \\|u(T) - u_1\\|_{H_0^1(0,1)} = \\|z(T)\\|_{H_0^1(0,1)} \\le \\hat\\delta.$$\nSince $T \\ge T_{\\hat\\delta}$ was arbitrary, this proves the desired conclusion for every $T \\ge T_{\\hat\\delta}$.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\section{Conclusion}\n\n\\begin{itemize} \n \\item In this paper, we have investigated the approximate controllability properties of the Generalized Burgers-Huxley (GBH) equation. We proved that the system is not globally approximately controllable in any prescribed finite time.\n \\item At present, we do not have a complete answer to the problem of partial approximate controllability (see~Remark~\\ref{PAC}), and we leave this question for future investigation. \n \\item Nevertheless, we established that for any two steady states $u_0$ and $u_1$ lying in the same connected component of the set of steady states, it is possible to drive the system from $u_0$ to an arbitrarily small neighborhood of $u_1$ in an appropriate time using a localized interior control. \n \\item It remains unknown how many connected components the set of steady states of the GBH equation possesses. \n \\item The question of whether the system is approximately controllable between steady states belonging to different connected components of the set of steady states remains open. \n \\item It is still unknown whether the system can be driven to the zero state (or to any specific steady state) in finite time from an arbitrary initial state. We intend to address these open problems in future work.\n \\end{itemize}\n\\par\\medskip\n\\hspace{-0.6cm}\\textbf{ Acknowledgements.} The authors thank the Department of Mathematics and Statistics at the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur for providing a conducive research environment. A.~ Patel acknowledges the financial support of the Ministry of Education (MHRD), Government of India, through the GATE fellowship. M. Biswas acknowledges the support of IIT Kanpur.\n\n\\appendix\n\\section{}\n\nThis appendix collects the detailed proofs of Lemma~\\ref{lem:left_ivp}, Lemma~\\ref{lem:right_ivp}, Theorem~\\ref{Thm_Soln_Trans_sys}, and Theorem~\\ref{Regularity_of_soln}. \n\n\\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma~\\ref{lem:left_ivp}]\nSet $y_1 = u$, $y_2 = u_x$, and $Y = (y_1, y_2)^\\top$. The initial-value\nproblem \\eqref{ivp_ss} is then equivalent to the first-order system\n\\begin{equation}\\label{first_order_system}\n\\begin{cases}\nY' = G(Y), \\\\[1mm]\nY(0) = \\begin{pmatrix} 0 \\\\ s \\end{pmatrix},\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $G : \\mathbb{R}^2 \\to \\mathbb{R}^2$ is given by\n\\[\nG(y_1, y_2) :=\n\\begin{pmatrix}\ny_2 \\\\[2mm]\n\\alpha\\, y_1^\\delta\\, y_2\n- \\beta\\, y_1 (1 - y_1^\\delta)(y_1^\\delta - \\gamma)\n\\end{pmatrix}.\n\\]\nSince $G \\in C^1(\\mathbb{R}^2;\\mathbb{R}^2)$, the Picard--Lindel\\\"{o}f theorem\nguarantees that for each $s \\in \\mathbb{R}$ there exists a unique maximal solution\n\\[\nY = (y_1,\\, y_2)^\\top\n\\in C^1\\bigl([0, l_{\\max}(s));\\, \\mathbb{R}^2\\bigr).\n\\]\nIn particular, $u := y_1 \\in C^2\\bigl([0, l_{\\max}(s))\\bigr)$. Fix $r > 0$ and set $B_r(0) := \\{Y \\in \\mathbb{R}^2 : |Y| \\le r\\}$.\nSince $G(0) = 0$ and $G \\in C^1$, the mean value theorem yields\n\\begin{equation}\\label{linear_growth}\n|G(Y)| \\le C_r\\, |Y|, \\qquad \\text{for all } Y \\in B_r(0),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere\n$$C_r := \\sup_{Y \\in B_r(0)} \\|DG(Y)\\| < \\infty.$$\nChoose $s_0 > 0$ such that $s_0 < r\\, e^{-C_r b} < r.$ Fix any $s\\in \\mathbb{R}$ with $|s| < s_0,$ so that $|Y(0)| = |s| < s_0 < r$.\nWe wish to show $l_{\\max}(s) > b$. If $l_{\\max}(s) > b$ already, there is nothing to prove. So assume for contradiction that\n\\begin{equation}\\label{contra_assumption}\nl_{\\max}(s) \\le b.\n\\end{equation}\nDefine $W(x) := |Y(x)|^2, \\quad \\text{for all}\\,\\, x \\in [0, l_{\\max}(s)),$ and $\\mathcal{\\mathcal{G}} := \\Bigl\\{x \\in [0, l_{\\max}(s)): |Y(\\xi)| < r \\ \\text{ for all } \\xi \\in [0, x]\\Bigr\\}.$\nSince $|Y(0)| = |s| < r$, we have $0 \\in \\mathcal{G}$, so \n$\\mathcal{G}$ is nonempty and the supremum $x^* := \\sup \\mathcal{G}$ is well defined. Moreover, by continuity of $Y$, there exists\n$\\tilde{\\varepsilon} > 0$ such that $x^* \\ge \\tilde{\\varepsilon} > 0$,\nand clearly $x^* \\le l_{\\max}(s)$.\n\n\\medskip\n\\noindent\\textit{Claim:}\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Ys_bound}\n|Y(x)| \\le |s|\\, e^{C_r x} < r,\n\\qquad \\text{for all } x \\in [0, x^*).\n\\end{equation}\n\n\\noindent\\textit{Proof of Claim.}\nFix $x \\in [0, x^*)$. By definition of $x^*$, we have $|Y(\\xi)| < r$ for\nall $\\xi \\in [0,x]$, so \\eqref{linear_growth} gives\n$|G(Y(\\xi))| \\le C_r |Y(\\xi)|$ on $[0, x]$.\nDifferentiating $W$ and applying the Cauchy--Schwarz inequality:\n\\[\nW'(\\xi)\n= 2\\langle Y(\\xi),\\, Y'(\\xi)\\rangle\n= 2\\langle Y(\\xi),\\, G(Y(\\xi))\\rangle\n\\le 2|Y(\\xi)|\\,|G(Y(\\xi))|\n\\le 2C_r\\, W(\\xi).\n\\]\nGr\\\"onwall's inequality on $[0,x]$ gives $W(x) \\le W(0)\\,e^{2C_r x}$, so $|Y(x)| \\le |s|\\, e^{C_r x}.$ Since $x < x^* \\le l_{\\max}(s) \\le b$ (using \\eqref{contra_assumption}),\nwe have $e^{C_r x} < e^{C_r b}$, and therefore\n$$|Y(x)| \\le |s|\\, e^{C_r x} < |s|\\, e^{C_r b} < s_0\\, e^{C_r b} < r,$$\nwhere the last inequality uses $s_0 < r\\,e^{-C_r b}$.\nThis proves the claim. \\hfill$\\square_{\\mathrm{claim}}$\n\n\\medskip\nWe now rule out $x^* < l_{\\max}(s)$. Suppose $x^* < l_{\\max}(s)$.\nPassing to the limit $x \\uparrow x^*$ in \\eqref{Ys_bound} and using\ncontinuity of $Y$:\n$$|Y(x^*)| \\le |s|\\, e^{C_r x^*} < r.$$\nHence $Y(x^*) \\in B_r(0)$. By continuity of $Y$, there exists $\\tilde{\\eta} > 0$ such that $|Y(x)| < r$ for all\n$x \\in [0,\\, x^* + \\tilde{\\eta}]$, contradicting the definition of $x^*$ as a supremum.\n\nTherefore $x^* = l_{\\max}(s)$, and \\eqref{Ys_bound} yields\n\\begin{equation}\\label{global_bound}\n|Y(x)| < r \\qquad \\text{for all } x \\in [0, l_{\\max}(s)).\n\\end{equation}\nThe bound \\eqref{global_bound} shows that $Y$ remains in the compact set ${B_r(0)}$ on its entire maximal interval $[0, l_{\\max}(s))$. Since $G \\in C^1(\\mathbb{R}^2;\\mathbb{R}^2)$, the standard continuation theorem for ODEs states that if a maximal solution remains in a compact set, then it can be extended beyond $l_{\\max}(s)$, contradicting maximality.\nTherefore the assumption \\eqref{contra_assumption} is false, and $l_{\\max}(s) > b.$ Consequently, $Y \\in C^1\\bigl([0,b];\\,\\mathbb{R}^2\\bigr), u \\in C^2\\bigl([0,b]\\bigr).$ Finally, for $0 < |s| < s_0$, the initial condition gives $y_2(0) = u_x(0) = s \\neq 0$, \nwhereas the trivial solution $u\\equiv 0$ satisfies $u_x(0)=0$. Hence the solution $u$ is nontrivial.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma~\\ref{lem:right_ivp}]\nThe proof is analogous to that of Lemma~\\ref{lem:left_ivp}. \nIndeed, after setting $y_1 = u$, $y_2 = u_x$, and $Y = (y_1, y_2)^\\top$. The initial-value\nproblem \\eqref{ivp_right} is then equivalent to the first-order system\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{cases}\nY' = G(Y), \\\\[1mm]\nY(1) = \\begin{pmatrix} 0 \\\\ \\hat{s} \\end{pmatrix},\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $G$ is same as in the proof of Lemma~\\ref{lem:left_ivp}. The Picard-Lindel\\\"of theorem gives a unique maximal solution \nstarting from $x=1$. Repeating\nthe continuation argument used in the proof of Lemma~\\ref{lem:left_ivp}, now\nbackward from $x=1$ to $x=c$, gives $\\hat{s}_0>0$ such that, for every $|\\hat{s}|<\\hat{s}_0$, the solution is defined on $[c,1]$. Moreover, if $0<|\\hat{s}|<\\hat{s}_0$, then $u \\not \\equiv0$; otherwise $u\\equiv 0$ would imply\n$u_x(1)=0$, contradicting $u_x(1)=\\hat{s}\\neq0$.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\subsection{Proof of Theorem~\\ref{Thm_Soln_Trans_sys}}\nThe proof of Theorem~\\ref{Thm_Soln_Trans_sys} relies on the Leray-Schauder fixed-point principle.\nLet us denote $Q: = (0,T) \\times (0,1)$ and assume that $ 0 < \\epsilon T \\le 1 $. System \\eqref{Close_loop_z_eqn_expanded} can be rewritten as\n\\begin{align}\n\\begin{cases}\nz_t-z_{xx}= \\mathcal N(t, z),\n& (t,x)\\in Q,\\\\\nz(t,0)=z(t,1)=0,\n& t\\in(0,T),\\\\\nz(0,x)=0,\n& x\\in(0,1),\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{align}\nwhere\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mathcal N(t, z)\n:={}&\n-\\alpha \\bar u^\\delta(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\\, z_x\n+\n\\Big(\nF'(\\bar u(\\epsilon t,\\cdot))\n-\\alpha\\delta \\bar u^{\\delta-1}(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\n\\bar u_x(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\n+\\xi(\\epsilon t)\n\\Big) z\n\\\\\n&-\n\\alpha\\delta\n\\bar u^{\\delta-1}(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) z\\, z_x\n-\n\\alpha\n\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\n\\binom{\\delta}{j}\n\\widetilde z^j\n\\bar u^{\\delta-j}(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) z_x\n\\\\\n&-\n\\alpha\n\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\n\\binom{\\delta}{j}\n\\widetilde z^j\n\\bar u^{\\delta-j}(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\n\\bar u_x(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\n\\\\\n&+\n\\Big(\nF( z+\\bar u(\\epsilon t,\\cdot))\n-F(\\bar u(\\epsilon t,\\cdot))\n-F'(\\bar u(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)) z\n\\Big)\n-\\epsilon \\bar u_\\tau(\\epsilon t,\\cdot).\n\\end{align*}\nIn order to apply the Leray-Schauder fixed-point theorem, we consider the homotopy (auxiliary) equation parameterized by $\\lambda \\in [0,1]$:\n\\begin{align}\n\\begin{cases}\nz_t-z_{xx}= \\mathcal \\lambda N(t, z),\n& (t,x)\\in Q,\\\\\nz(t,0)=z(t,1)=0,\n& t\\in(0,T),\\\\\nz(0,x)=0,\n& x\\in(0,1),\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{align}\nSet $\\hat{q} := 2(2\\delta + 1)$ and define $\\mathcal{X}_T := L^{\\hat{q}}(0,T; H_0^1(0,1)).$ Let us consider the mapping $\\Phi:\\mathcal X_T\\times[0,1]\\to\\mathcal X_T$ such that for $\\widetilde z\\in\\mathcal X_T$ and $\\lambda\\in[0,1]$, \n$z=\\Phi(\\widetilde z,\\lambda)$\nif and only if $z$ is the solution to the linear problem\n\\begin{align}\\label{Phi_linear_problem}\n\\begin{cases}\nz_t-z_{xx}=\\lambda\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z),\n& (t,x)\\in Q,\\\\\nz(t,0)=z(t,1)=0,\n& t\\in(0,T),\\\\\nz(0,x)=0,\n& x\\in(0,1).\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{align}\nSince the mappings $\\tau\\in[0,1]\\mapsto \\bar u(\\tau,\\cdot)$ and $\\tau\\in[0,1]\\mapsto \\xi(\\tau)$ satisfy\n$$\\bar u\\in C^1([0,1];C^2([0,1])),\\quad \\xi\\in C^1([0,1];\\mathcal L(L^2(0,1))).$$\nTherefore, there exist positive constants $M$ and $M_\\xi$ such that\n$$\\sup_{\\tau\\in[0,1]}\\big\\{\n\\|\\bar u(\\tau)\\|_{L^\\infty(0,1)}\n+\n\\|\\bar u_x(\\tau)\\|_{L^\\infty(0,1)}\n+\n\\|\\bar u_\\tau(\\tau)\\|_{L^\\infty(0,1)}\\big\\}\n\\le M,\\ \\text{and}$$\n$$\\sup_{\\tau\\in[0,1]}\n\\|\\xi(\\tau)\\|_{\\mathcal L(L^2(0,1))}\n\\le M_\\xi.$$\nNote that, upon introducing the slow-time variable $\\tau=\\epsilon t$, and whenever no confusion arises, we use the shorthand notation $\\bar u:=\\bar u(\\epsilon t,x)=\\bar u(\\tau,x), \\bar u_x:=\\partial_x\\bar u(\\epsilon t,x), \\bar u_\\tau:=\\partial_\\tau\\bar u(\\epsilon t,x).$ Thus, in the time-dependent problem, $\\bar u$ represents the composed function\n$$(t,x)\\longmapsto \\bar u(\\epsilon t,x).$$\nIn particular, by the chain rule, $\\partial_t\\bigl(\\bar u(\\epsilon t,x)\\bigr)=\\epsilon\\bar u_\\tau(\\epsilon t,x)=\n\\epsilon\\bar u_\\tau,$ whereas\n$$\\partial_x\\bigl(\\bar u(\\epsilon t,x)\\bigr)\n=\n\\bar u_x(\\epsilon t,x)\n=\n\\bar u_x.$$\n\nFirst we prove the following lemma.\n\\begin{lem}\\label{lem:Phi_well_defined_cont_compact}\n\n The mapping $\\Phi:\\mathcal X_T\\times[0,1]\\to\\mathcal X_T$ is well-defined, continuous, and compact.\n\\end{lem}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nWe begin by showing that $\\Phi$ is well-defined. Let $\\widetilde z\\in\\mathcal X_T.$ Set $Z(t):=\\|\\widetilde z(t,\\cdot)\\|_{H_0^1(0,1)}$. Then $Z\\in L^{\\hat q}(0,T)$ with $\\hat q=2(2\\delta+1).$\n\nUsing the continuous embedding: $H_0^1(0,1)\\hookrightarrow L^\\infty(0,1),$ it follows that there exists a constant $C>0$ such that $\\|\\varphi\\|_{L^\\infty(0,1)}\n\\le C\\|\\varphi\\|_{H_0^1(0,1)}$ for all $\\varphi\\in H_0^1(0,1)$. We first show that $\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z)\\in L^2(Q)$.\n\nFor the first term $\\bar u^\\delta(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) \\widetilde z_x(t,\\cdot) $, we have\n$$\\|\\bar u^\\delta(\\epsilon t,\\cdot) \\widetilde z_x(t,\\cdot)\\|_{L^2(0,1)}\n\\le C Z(t).$$\nSince $q\\ge2$ and $T<\\infty$, it follows that $\\bar u^\\delta \\widetilde z_x\\in L^2(Q)$.\n\nNext, the lower-order linear terms satisfy\n$$\\left\\|\n\\left(\nF'(\\bar u)\n-\\alpha\\delta \\bar u^{\\delta-1}\\bar u_x\n\\right)\\widetilde z\n\\right\\|_{L^2(0,1)}\n\\le C Z(t),$$\nand\n$$\\|\\xi(\\epsilon t)\\widetilde z(t,\\cdot)\\|_{L^2(0,1)}\n\\le C\\|\\widetilde z(t,\\cdot)\\|_{L^2(0,1)}\n\\le C Z(t).$$\nTherefore these terms also belong to $L^2(Q)$. We now estimate the derivative nonlinearities. For $1\\le j\\le\\delta$, using the embedding $H_0^1(0,1)\\hookrightarrow L^\\infty(0,1)$, we get\n$$\\|\\widetilde z^j\\widetilde z_x\\|_{L^2(0,1)}\n\\le\n\\|\\widetilde z\\|_{L^\\infty(0,1)}^j\n\\|\\widetilde z_x\\|_{L^2(0,1)}\n\\le\nC Z(t)^{j+1}.$$\nHence\n$$\\int_0^T\n\\|\\widetilde z^j\\widetilde z_x\\|_{L^2(0,1)}^2\\,dt\n\\le\nC\\int_0^T Z(t)^{2(j+1)}\\,dt.$$\nSince $j\\le\\delta$, we have $2(j+1)\\le 2(\\delta+1)\\le 2(2\\delta+1)=q.$ Thus $\\widetilde z^j\\widetilde z_x\\in L^2(Q)$ for $1\\le j\\le\\delta.$ Therefore all derivative nonlinearities in $\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z)$ belong to $L^2(Q)$.\n\nNext, for the lower-order polynomial terms, for $2\\le j\\le\\delta$, we have\n$$\\|\\widetilde z^j\\|_{L^2(0,1)}\n\\le\n\\|\\widetilde z\\|_{L^\\infty(0,1)}^{j-1}\n\\|\\widetilde z\\|_{L^2(0,1)}\n\\le\nC Z(t)^j.$$\nTherefore,\n$$\\int_0^T\n\\|\\widetilde z^j\\|_{L^2(0,1)}^2\\,dt\n\\le\nC\\int_0^T Z(t)^{2j}\\,dt.$$\nSince $2j\\le 2\\delta\\le q,$ these terms also belong to $L^2(Q)$.\n\nIt remains to estimate the term: $F(\\widetilde z+\\bar u)-F(\\bar u)-F'(\\bar u)\\widetilde z$. Using \\eqref{Taylor_remainder_bound} together with the fact that $\\bar u$ is uniformly bounded, there exists a constant $C>0$ such that\n$$|F(\\widetilde z+\\bar u)\n-F(\\bar u)\n-F'(\\bar u)\\widetilde z|\n\\le\nC\\left(|\\widetilde z|^2+|\\widetilde z|^{2\\delta+1}\\right).$$\nHence\n$$\\|F(\\widetilde z+\\bar u)\n-F(\\bar u)\n-F'(\\bar u)\\widetilde z\\|_{L^2(0,1)}\n\\le\nC\\left(Z(t)^2+Z(t)^{2\\delta+1}\\right).$$\nConsequently,\n$$\\int_0^T\n\\|F(\\widetilde z+\\bar u)\n-F(\\bar u)\n-F'(\\bar u)\\widetilde z\\|_{L^2(0,1)}^2\\,dt\n\\le\nC\\int_0^T\n\\left(\nZ(t)^4+Z(t)^{2(2\\delta+1)}\n\\right)dt.$$\nSince $2(2\\delta+1)=\\hat q$ and $\\hat q\\ge4$, the right-hand side is finite. Therefore\n$$F(\\widetilde z+\\bar u)\n-F(\\bar u)\n-F'(\\bar u)\\widetilde z \\in L^2(Q).$$\n%{\\color{red}This is the reason for choosing $\\hat q=2(2\\delta+1).$}\nFinally, $\\|\\epsilon\\bar u_\\tau(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\\|_{L^2(0,1)}\n\\le C\\epsilon.$ Hence $\\epsilon\\bar u_\\tau \\in L^2(Q).$\n\nCombining the above estimates, we obtain $\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z)\\in L^2(Q).$ Therefore, by the $L^2$-regularity theory for the heat equation with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition, problem \\eqref{Phi_linear_problem} admits a unique solution satisfying\n$$z\\in L^2(0,T;H^2(0,1)\\cap H_0^1(0,1))\\cap C([0,T];H_0^1(0,1)),\n\\qquad\nz_t\\in L^2(Q).$$\nIn particular, $z\\in L^\\infty(0,T;H_0^1(0,1)).$ Since $T<\\infty$, this implies $z\\in L^{\\hat q}(0,T;H_0^1(0,1))=\\mathcal X_T$. Thus $\\Phi(\\widetilde z,\\lambda)\\in\\mathcal X_T.$ Hence $\\Phi$ is well-defined.\n\nNext, we prove that $\\Phi$ is continuous. Let\n$$\\widetilde z_n\\to \\widetilde z\n\\quad\\text{in }\\mathcal X_T \\quad \\text{and} \\quad \\lambda_n\\to\\lambda\n\\quad\\text{in }[0,1].$$\nSet $z_n:=\\Phi(\\widetilde z_n,\\lambda_n),$ and $z:=\\Phi(\\widetilde z,\\lambda).$ We prove that $z_n\\to z$ in $\\mathcal X_T$.\n\nFirst, we show that \n$$\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z_n)\n\\to\n\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z)\n\\quad\\text{in }L^2(Q).$$\nDefine \n$$A_n(t):=\\|\\widetilde z_n(t,\\cdot)\\|_{H_0^1(0,1)}, A(t):=\\|\\widetilde z(t,\\cdot)\\|_{H_0^1(0,1)}, \\text{ and }D_n(t):=\\|\\widetilde z_n(t,\\cdot)-\\widetilde z(t,\\cdot)\\|_{H_0^1(0,1)}.$$\nSince\n$\\widetilde z_n\\to\\widetilde z$\nin $L^{\\hat q}(0,T;H_0^1(0,1)),$ we have $D_n\\to0$\nin $L^{\\hat q}(0,T).$ Moreover, $\\{A_n\\}$ is bounded in $L^q(0,T)$, and $A\\in L^{\\hat q}(0,T)$. We shall use the following estimate. Let $0\\le \\ell\\le 2\\delta$. Then\n\\begin{align}\\label{key_holder_estimate}\n\\|(A_n^\\ell+A^\\ell)D_n\\|_{L^2(0,T)}\n\\le\nC_T\n\\left(\n\\|A_n\\|_{L^{\\hat q}(0,T)}^\\ell\n+\n\\|A\\|_{L^{\\hat q}(0,T)}^\\ell\n\\right)\n\\|D_n\\|_{L^{\\hat q}(0,T)}.\n\\end{align}\nIndeed, since $\\hat q=2(2\\delta+1)$, we have\n$$\\frac{\\ell+1}{\\hat q}\\le \\frac{2\\delta+1}{2(2\\delta+1)}=\\frac12.$$\nThus $$\\frac{\\hat q}{\\ell+1}\\ge2.$$\nFor $\\ell>0$, \\text{H\\\"{o}lder's} inequality gives $$\\|A_n^\\ell D_n\\|_{L^{\\hat{q}/(\\ell+1)}(0,T)}\n\\le\n\\|A_n\\|_{L^{\\hat q}(0,T)}^\\ell\n\\|D_n\\|_{L^{\\hat q}(0,T)}.$$\nSince $\\hat q/(\\ell+1)\\ge2$ and $T<\\infty$, we also have $L^{{\\hat q}/(\\ell+1)}(0,T)\\hookrightarrow L^2(0,T)$. Therefore,\n$$\\|A_n^\\ell D_n\\|_{L^2(0,T)}\n\\le\nC_T\n\\|A_n\\|_{L^{\\hat q}(0,T)}^\\ell\n\\|D_n\\|_{L^{\\hat q}(0,T)}.$$\nThe case $\\ell=0$ follows directly from $L^{\\hat q}(0,T)\\hookrightarrow L^2(0,T)$. The same argument applies to $A^\\ell D_n$. Hence \\eqref{key_holder_estimate} follows.\n\nWe now estimate the difference of each term in $\\mathcal N$. The linear terms are immediate. Since the coefficients depending on $\\bar u$ are bounded, we have\n$$\\|\\bar u^\\delta(\\widetilde z_n-\\widetilde z)_x\\|_{L^2(Q)}\n\\le\nC\\|\\widetilde z_n-\\widetilde z\\|_{L^2(0,T;H_0^1)}\n\\to0.$$\nSimilarly,\n$$\\left\\|\n\\left(\nF'(\\bar u)\n-\\alpha\\delta \\bar u^{\\delta-1}(\\bar u)_x\n\\right)\n(\\widetilde z_n-\\widetilde z)\n\\right\\|_{L^2(Q)}\n\\to0.$$\nAlso,\n$$\\|\\xi(\\epsilon t)(\\widetilde z_n-\\widetilde z)\\|_{L^2(Q)}\n\\le\nC\\|\\widetilde z_n-\\widetilde z\\|_{L^2(Q)}\n\\to0.$$\nNext, consider the derivative nonlinearities. For $1\\le j\\le\\delta$,\nwe claim that\n$$\\widetilde z_n^j(\\widetilde z_n)_x\n\\to\n\\widetilde z^j\\widetilde z_x\n\\quad\\text{in }L^2(Q).$$\nIndeed,\n$$\\widetilde z_n^j(\\widetilde z_n)_x\n-\n\\widetilde z^j\\widetilde z_x\n=\n(\\widetilde z_n^j-\\widetilde z^j)(\\widetilde z_n)_x\n+\n\\widetilde z^j\\big((\\widetilde z_n)_x-\\widetilde z_x\\big).$$\nUsing\n$$|a^j-b^j|\\le C_j(|a|^{j-1}+|b|^{j-1})|a-b|$$\nand the embedding\n$$H_0^1(0,1)\\hookrightarrow L^\\infty(0,1),$$\nwe obtain, for a.e. $t\\in(0,T)$,\n\\begin{align*}\n\\|\\widetilde z_n^j(\\widetilde z_n)_x\n-\n\\widetilde z^j\\widetilde z_x\\|_{L^2(0,1)}\n\\le\nC\\left(A_n(t)^j+A(t)^j\\right)D_n(t).\n\\end{align*}\nSince $j\\le\\delta\\le 2\\delta$, applying\n\\eqref{key_holder_estimate} with $\\ell=j$ gives\n$$\\|\\widetilde z_n^j(\\widetilde z_n)_x\n-\n\\widetilde z^j\\widetilde z_x\\|_{L^2(Q)}\n\\le\nC_T\n\\left(\n\\|A_n\\|_{L^q}^j+\\|A\\|_{L^q}^j\n\\right)\n\\|D_n\\|_{L^q},$$\nand since $D_n\\to0\n\\quad\\text{in }L^q(0,T),$ we get $\\widetilde z_n^j(\\widetilde z_n)_x\n\\to\n\\widetilde z^j\\widetilde z_x$ in $L^2(Q)$.\n\nNow consider the lower-order polynomial terms. For $2\\le j\\le\\delta$, we have\n$$|\\widetilde z_n^j-\\widetilde z^j|\n\\le\nC_j\n\\left(\n|\\widetilde z_n|^{j-1}\n+\n|\\widetilde z|^{j-1}\n\\right)\n|\\widetilde z_n-\\widetilde z|.$$\nTherefore,\n$$\\|\\widetilde z_n^j-\\widetilde z^j\\|_{L^2(0,1)}\n\\le\nC\n\\left(\nA_n(t)^{j-1}\n+\nA(t)^{j-1}\n\\right)\nD_n(t).$$\nSince $j-1\\le\\delta-1\\le2\\delta$, using\n\\eqref{key_holder_estimate} with $\\ell=j-1$, we obtain\n$\\|\\widetilde z_n^j-\\widetilde z^j\\|_{L^2(Q)}\n\\to0.$ Since $\\bar u$ and $\\bar u_x$ are bounded, all\nlower-order polynomial terms converge in $L^2(Q)$.\n\nIt remains to consider the reaction remainder\n$$\\hat{\\mathcal{R}}(t,w):=F(w+\\bar u)-F(\\bar u)-F'(\\bar u)w.$$\nSince $F$ is a polynomial of degree $2\\delta+1$ and $\\bar u$ is uniformly bounded, there exists $C>0$ such that, for all $a,b\\in\\mathbb R$,\n$$|\\hat{\\mathcal R}(t,a)-\\hat{\\mathcal R}(t,b)|\n\\le\nC\\sum_{m=2}^{2\\delta+1}\n\\left(\n|a|^{m-1}+|b|^{m-1}\n\\right)|a-b|.$$\nTaking $a=\\widetilde z_n(t,x), b=\\widetilde z(t,x),$ and using again $H_0^1(0,1)\\hookrightarrow L^\\infty(0,1),$ we get\n$$\\|\\hat{\\mathcal R}(t,\\widetilde z_n)-\\hat{\\mathcal R}(t,\\widetilde z)\\|_{L^2(0,1)}\n\\le\nC\\sum_{m=2}^{2\\delta+1}\n\\left(\nA_n(t)^{m-1}\n+\nA(t)^{m-1}\n\\right)\nD_n(t).$$\nHere $m-1\\le 2\\delta.$ Therefore, applying \\eqref{key_holder_estimate} with $\\ell=m-1$, we obtain\n$$\\|\\hat{\\mathcal R}(t,\\widetilde z_n)-\\hat{\\mathcal R}(t,\\widetilde z)\\|_{L^2(Q)}\\to0.$$\nCombining the above estimates, we conclude that\n$$\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z_n)\\to\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z)\\quad\\text{in }L^2(Q).$$\nFurthermore,\n$$\\lambda_n\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z_n)\n-\n\\lambda\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z)\n=\n(\\lambda_n-\\lambda)\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z_n)\n+\n\\lambda\\left(\n\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z_n)\n-\n\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z)\n\\right).$$\nSince $\\{\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z_n)\\}$ is bounded in $L^2(Q)$ and $\\lambda_n\\to\\lambda$, we get\n$$\\lambda_n\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z_n)\\to\n\\lambda\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z)\n\\quad\\text{in }L^2(Q).$$\nNow $z_n-z$ solves\n\\[\n\\begin{cases}\n(z_n-z)_t-(z_n-z)_{xx}\n=\n\\lambda_n\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z_n)\n-\n\\lambda\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z),\n& (t,x)\\in Q,\\\\\nz_n-z=0,\n& t\\in(0,T),\\ x=0,1,\\\\\n(z_n-z)(0,x)=0,\n& x\\in(0,1).\n\\end{cases}\n\\]\nBy the $L^2$-regularity estimate for the heat equation, $$z_n-z\\to0\\ \\text{in}\\ L^2(0,T;H^2(0,1)\\cap H_0^1(0,1))\\cap\nH^1(0,T;L^2(0,1)).$$\nIn particular, $z_n\\to z$ in $C([0,T];H_0^1(0,1))$. Since $T<\\infty$, this implies\n\\[\nz_n\\to z\n\\quad\\text{in }L^{\\hat q}(0,T;H_0^1(0,1)),\n\\]\ni.e., $z_n\\to z$ in $\\mathcal X_T$. Hence $\\Phi$ is continuous.\n\nFinally, we now show that $\\Phi$ is compact. Let $\\{(\\widetilde z_n,\\lambda_n)\\}$ be a bounded sequence in $\\mathcal X_T\\times[0,1].$ Set $z_n:=\\Phi(\\widetilde z_n,\\lambda_n).$ Since $ \\{\\widetilde{z}_n\\} $ is bounded in $\\mathcal{X}_T$, the estimates established earlier (in the proof of well-definedness and continuity) imply that $\\{\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z_n)\\}$ is bounded in $L^2(Q)$. Since $\\lambda_n\\in[0,1]$, it follows that $\\{\\lambda_n\\mathcal N(t,\\widetilde z_n)\\}$ is also bounded in $L^2(Q)$.\n\nBy the $L^2$-regularity estimate for the heat equation, the sequence $\\{z_n\\}$ is bounded in $L^2(0,T;H^2(0,1)\\cap H_0^1(0,1))\\cap H^1(0,T;L^2(0,1))$.\nMoreover, $\\{z_n\\}$ is bounded in $C([0,T];H_0^1(0,1))$.\n\nBy the {Aubin-Lions compactness lemma,} \n$$L^2(0,T;H^2(0,1)\\cap H^1_0 )\n\\cap\nH^1(0,T;L^2(0,1))\n\\hookrightarrow\\hookrightarrow\nL^2(0,T;H_0^1(0,1)).$$\nTherefore, up to a subsequence,\n$$z_n\\to z\n\\quad\\text{strongly in }L^2(0,T;H_0^1(0,1)).$$\nSince $\\{z_n\\}$ is bounded in $C([0,T];H_0^1(0,1))$, there exists $K>0$ such that\n$$\\|z_n(t)\\|_{H_0^1(0,1)}\\le K\n\\qquad\n\\text{for all }t\\in[0,T]$$\nand all $n$. Passing to a subsequence if necessary, we may also assume\nthat\n$$z_n\\rightharpoonup^\\ast z\n\\quad\\text{in }L^\\infty(0,T;H_0^1(0,1)),$$\nand hence\n$$\\|z(t)\\|_{H_0^1(0,1)}\\le K\n\\qquad\n\\text{for a.e. }t\\in(0,T).$$\nConsequently,\n$$\\|z_n(t)-z(t)\\|_{H_0^1(0,1)}\\le 2K\n\\qquad\n\\text{for a.e. }t\\in(0,T).$$\nTherefore,\n\\[\n\\begin{aligned}\n\\|z_n-z\\|_{\\mathcal X_T}^{\\hat q}\n=\n\\int_0^T\n\\|z_n(t)-z(t)\\|_{H_0^1(0,1)}^{\\hat q}\\,dt\n\\le\n(2K)^{\\hat{q}-2}\n\\int_0^T\n\\|z_n(t)-z(t)\\|_{H_0^1(0,1)}^2\\,dt.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\]\nSince $z_n\\to z$ strongly in $L^2(0,T;H_0^1(0,1))$, the right-hand side tends to zero. Hence $z_n\\to z$ strongly in $\\mathcal X_T$. Thus every bounded sequence in the range of $\\Phi$ has a convergent subsequence in $\\mathcal X_T$. Therefore $\\Phi$ is compact.\nConsequently,\n$$\\Phi:\\mathcal X_T\\times[0,1]\\to\\mathcal X_T$$\nis well-defined, continuous, and compact.\n\\end{proof}\nNext, we establish the following lemma.\n\n\\begin{lem}\\label{lem:uniform_bound_fixed_points}\nWe now consider the set of fixed points\n$$\\widetilde{\\Phi} := \\left\\{ z \\in \\mathcal{X}_T : \\, z = \\Phi(z,\\lambda)\\,\\, \\text{ for some } \\lambda \\in [0,1] \\right\\}.$$\nThen there exists a constant $C_T>0$, independent of $\\lambda\\in[0,1]$ and of the corresponding fixed point $z$, such that\n$$\\|z\\|_{L^\\infty(0,T;H_0^1(0,1))}\n+\n\\|z\\|_{L^2(0,T;H^2(0,1))}\n+\n\\|z_t\\|_{L^2(Q)}\n\\le C_T.$$\nConsequently, $\\|z\\|_{\\mathcal X_T}\\le C_T,$ and hence $\\widetilde{\\Phi}$ is bounded in $\\mathcal X_T$.\n\\end{lem}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nLet $\\lambda\\in[0,1]$, and let $z\\in\\mathcal X_T$ satisfy $z=\\Phi(z,\\lambda).$ By the definition of $\\Phi$ and\nLemma~\\ref{lem:Phi_well_defined_cont_compact}, the function $z$ satisfies\n\\begin{equation}\\label{homotopy_fixed_point_equation}\n\\begin{cases}\nz_t-z_{xx}=\\lambda\\mathcal N(t,z),\n& (t,x)\\in Q,\\\\\nz(t,0)=z(t,1)=0,\n& t\\in(0,T),\\\\\nz(0,x)=0,\n& x\\in(0,1),\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nand has the regularity\n\\begin{equation}\\label{fixed_point_regularities}\n\\begin{aligned}\nz\\in{}&\nL^2\\bigl(0,T;H^2(0,1)\\cap H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr)\n\\cap H^1\\bigl(0,T;L^2(0,1)\\bigr)\n\\cap C\\bigl([0,T];H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr).\n\\end{aligned}\n\\end{equation}\nThroughout the proof, $C>0$ denotes a generic constant independent of $\\lambda$ and $z$, which may change from one line to another. The term $\\mathcal{N}(t,z)$ can be written as follows:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{compact_form_nonlin}\n\\mathcal N(t,z)\n=\n\\sum_{j=0}^{\\delta}a_j(t,x)z^jz_x\n+\\xi(\\epsilon t)z\n+P(t,x,z)\n+\\mathcal{Q}(t,x),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere\n\\begin{align*}\na_0(t,x):=-\\alpha\\bar u^\\delta(\\epsilon t,x),\\quad a_1(t,x):=\n-\\alpha\\delta\\bar u^{\\delta-1}(\\epsilon t,x)\n\\end{align*}\nand, for $2\\le j\\le\\delta$,\n$$a_j(t,x):=\n-\\alpha\\binom{\\delta}{j}\n\\bar u^{\\delta-j}(\\epsilon t,x).$$\nAs usual, a sum over an empty index set is understood to be zero. We also set\n$$\\mathcal Q(t,x):=-\\epsilon\\bar u_\\tau(\\epsilon t,x),\\quad \\text{and}$$\n\\begin{align}\\label{definition_P}\nP(t,x,s)\n:={}&\nF(s+\\bar u)-F(\\bar u)\n-\\alpha\\delta\n\\bar u^{\\delta-1}\\bar u_x\\,s-\n\\alpha\n\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\n\\binom{\\delta}{j}\ns^j\\bar u^{\\delta-j}\n\\bar u_x .\n\\end{align}\nSince $F(v)=-\\beta v^{2\\delta+1}+\\beta(1+\\gamma)v^{\\delta+1}-\\beta\\gamma v$,\nthe function $s\\mapsto P(t,x,s)$ is a polynomial of degree\n$2\\delta+1$ whose leading coefficient is $-\\beta$. Thus,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{polynomial_representation_P}\nP(t,x,s)\n=\n-\\beta s^{2\\delta+1}\n+\n\\sum_{k=1}^{2\\delta}P_k(t,x)s^k,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere the coefficients $P_k$ satisfy \n$$\\max_{1\\le k\\le2\\delta}\n\\|P_k\\|_{L^\\infty(Q)}\n\\le C.$$ \nThe regularity of $\\bar u$ and the condition $0<\\epsilon T\\le1$ give\n\\begin{equation}\\label{uniform_coefficient_bounds}\n\\max_{0\\le j\\le\\delta}\n\\left(\n\\|a_j\\|_{L^\\infty(Q)}\n+\n\\|(a_j)_x\\|_{L^\\infty(Q)}\n\\right)\n+\n\\|\\mathcal{Q}\\|_{L^\\infty(Q)}\n\\le C.\n\\end{equation}\nMoreover, since $\\xi$ is continuous on the compact interval $[0,1]$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{uniform_xi_bound}\n\\sup_{\\tau\\in[0,1]}\n\\|\\xi(\\tau)\\|_{\\mathcal L(L^2(0,1))}\n\\le M_\\xi.\n\\end{equation}\nWe first justify the test functions used below. From\n\\eqref{fixed_point_regularities} and the one-dimensional Sobolev embedding $H_0^1(0,1)\\hookrightarrow L^\\infty(0,1),$ we obtain\n$$\\|z\\|_{L^\\infty(Q)}\\le C\\|z\\|_{L^\\infty(0,T;H_0^1(0,1))}<\\infty.$$\nConsequently,\n\\begin{align*}\n |z|^{2\\delta}z\\in L^2(0,T;H_0^1(0,1)),\\quad \\text{and}\\quad \\partial_x\\bigl(|z|^{2\\delta}z\\bigr)\n=\n(2\\delta+1)|z|^{2\\delta}z_x.\n\\end{align*}\nTherefore, $|z|^{2\\delta}z$ is an admissible test function in \\eqref{homotopy_fixed_point_equation}. The Sobolev chain rule gives\n\\begin{equation}\\label{time_chain_rule}\n\\int_0^1z_t|z|^{2\\delta}z\\,dx\n=\n\\frac{1}{2(\\delta+1)}\n\\frac{d}{dt}\n\\|z(t)\\|_{L^{2(\\delta+1)}(0,1)}^{2(\\delta+1)}\n\\end{equation}\nfor almost every $t\\in(0,T)$. Similarly, since $z_{xx},z_t\\in L^2(Q)$, we may test \\eqref{homotopy_fixed_point_equation} by $-z_{xx}$. The\nHilbert-space chain rule yields\n\\begin{equation}\\label{H1_chain_rule}\n\\int_0^1z_t(-z_{xx})\\,dx\n=\n\\frac12\\frac{d}{dt}\\|z_x(t)\\|_{L^2(0,1)}^2\n\\end{equation}\nfor almost every $t\\in(0,T)$.\nWe now establish estimates independent of $\\lambda$.\n\n\\noindent\n\\textbf{Step 1: An $L^{2(\\delta+1)}$-estimate.}\n\nTesting \\eqref{homotopy_fixed_point_equation} by\n$|z|^{2\\delta}z$, and using \\eqref{time_chain_rule}, we obtain\n\\begin{align}\\label{first_energy_identity}\n&\n\\frac{1}{2(\\delta+1)}\n\\frac{d}{dt}\n\\|z(t)\\|_{L^{2(\\delta+1)}}^{2(\\delta+1)}\n+\n(2\\delta+1)\n\\int_0^1|z|^{2\\delta}|z_x|^2\\,dx\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&\\qquad\n=\n\\lambda\\sum_{j=0}^{\\delta}I_j(t)\n+\\lambda I_\\xi(t)\n+\\lambda I_P(t)\n+\\lambda I_\\mathcal{Q}(t),\n\\end{align}\nwhere\n$$I_j(t):=\n\\int_0^1a_j(t,x)z^jz_x|z|^{2\\delta}z\\,dx, \\quad I_\\xi(t)\n:=\n\\int_0^1(\\xi(\\epsilon t)z)|z|^{2\\delta}z\\,dx,$$\n$$I_P(t):=\n\\int_0^1P(t,x,z)|z|^{2\\delta}z\\,dx,\\quad \\text{and} \\quad I_\\mathcal{Q}(t):=\\int_0^1 \\mathcal{Q}|z|^{2\\delta}z\\,dx$$.\nFor $0\\le j\\le\\delta$, define\n$$G_j(s):=\\int_0^s r^j|r|^{2\\delta}r\\,dr.$$\nThen $G_j'(s)=s^j|s|^{2\\delta}s$ and $|G_j(s)|\\le C|s|^{2\\delta+j+2}$. Therefore,\n$$I_j(t)=\\int_0^1a_j(t,x)\\frac{d}{dx}G_j(z)\\,dx.$$\nSince $z(t,0)=z(t,1)=0$, we have $G_j(z(t,0))=G_j(z(t,1))=0$. Integration by parts and \\eqref{uniform_coefficient_bounds} give\n$$I_j(t)=-\\int_0^1(a_j)_x(t,x)G_j(z)\\,dx$$ \nand consequently\n$$|I_j(t)|\\le C\\int_0^1|z|^{2\\delta+j+2}\\,dx.$$\nSince $j\\le\\delta$, we get $2\\delta+j+2\\le3\\delta+2<4\\delta+2$. Thus, for every $\\eta>0$, there exists $C_\\eta>0$ such that $|s|^{2\\delta+j+2}\\le\\eta|s|^{4\\delta+2}+C_\\eta$ for all $s\\in\\mathbb R$. Hence\n\\begin{equation}\\label{first_convection_estimate}\n\\lambda\\sum_{j=0}^{\\delta}|I_j(t)|\n\\le\nC\\lambda\\eta\n\\|z(t)\\|_{L^{4\\delta+2}}^{4\\delta+2}\n+\nC_\\eta\\lambda.\n\\end{equation}\nFrom \\eqref{polynomial_representation_P}, we have\n\\begin{align*}\nI_P(t)\n={}&\n-\\beta\\int_0^1|z|^{4\\delta+2}\\,dx\n+\n\\sum_{k=1}^{2\\delta}\n\\int_0^1p_k(t,x)z^k|z|^{2\\delta}z\\,dx.\n\\end{align*}\nFor $1\\le k\\le2\\delta$, we have $\\bigl|z^k|z|^{2\\delta}z\\bigr|\\le|z|^{2\\delta+k+1},$ and\n$2\\delta+k+1\\le4\\delta+1<4\\delta+2$. Therefore,\n$$|z|^{2\\delta+k+1}\\le\\eta|z|^{4\\delta+2}+C_\\eta.$$\nIt follows that\n\\begin{equation}\\label{first_reaction_estimate}\nI_P(t)\n\\le\n-(\\beta-C\\eta)\n\\|z(t)\\|_{L^{4\\delta+2}}^{4\\delta+2}\n+C_\\eta.\n\\end{equation}\nFor the feedback term, using \\eqref{uniform_xi_bound}, we obtain\n\\begin{align*}\n|I_\\xi(t)|\n\\le\n\\|\\xi(\\epsilon t)z\\|_{L^2}\n\\||z|^{2\\delta}z\\|_{L^2}\n\\le\nM_\\xi\n\\|z\\|_{L^2}\n\\|z\\|_{L^{4\\delta+2}}^{2\\delta+1}.\n\\end{align*}\nYoung's inequality gives\n\\begin{equation}\\label{first_feedback_estimate}\n|I_\\xi(t)|\n\\le\n\\eta\\|z\\|_{L^{4\\delta+2}}^{4\\delta+2}\n+\nC_\\eta\\|z\\|_{L^2}^2.\n\\end{equation}\nSince the interval $(0,1)$ has measure one, $\\|z\\|_{L^2}^2\\le\\|z\\|_{L^{2(\\delta+1)}}^2\\le1+\\|z\\|_{L^{2(\\delta+1)}}^{2(\\delta+1)}$. Thus,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{first_feedback_estimate_two}\n|I_\\xi(t)|\n\\le\n\\eta\\|z\\|_{L^{4\\delta+2}}^{4\\delta+2}\n+\nC_\\eta\n\\left(\n1+\n\\|z\\|_{L^{2(\\delta+1)}}^{2(\\delta+1)}\n\\right).\n\\end{equation}\nSimilarly,\n\\begin{align*}\n|I_\\mathcal{Q}(t)|\n\\le\n\\|\\mathcal{Q}(t)\\|_{L^2}\n\\||z|^{2\\delta}z\\|_{L^2}\n=\n\\|\\mathcal{Q}(t)\\|_{L^2}\n\\|z\\|_{L^{4\\delta+2}}^{2\\delta+1}.\n\\end{align*}\nBy Young's inequality and \\eqref{uniform_coefficient_bounds},\n\\begin{equation}\\label{first_forcing_estimate}\n|I_h(t)|\n\\le\n\\eta\\|z\\|_{L^{4\\delta+2}}^{4\\delta+2}\n+C_\\eta.\n\\end{equation}\nCombining\n\\eqref{first_energy_identity}--\\eqref{first_forcing_estimate}, and\nchoosing $\\eta>0$ sufficiently small, we find constants\n$c_1,c_2,C>0$, independent of $\\lambda$, such that\n\\begin{align}\\label{first_energy_inequality}\n\\frac{d}{dt}\n\\|z(t)\\|_{L^{2(\\delta+1)}}^{2(\\delta+1)}\n+\nc_1\n\\int_0^1|z|^{2\\delta}|z_x|^2\\,dx\n+\nc_2\\lambda\n\\|z(t)\\|_{L^{4\\delta+2}}^{4\\delta+2}\n\\le\nC\\left(\n1+\n\\|z(t)\\|_{L^{2(\\delta+1)}}^{2(\\delta+1)}\n\\right).\n\\end{align}\nSince $z(0)=0$, Gronwall's inequality yields\n\\begin{equation}\\label{first_uniform_bound}\n\\sup_{0\\le t\\le T}\n\\|z(t)\\|_{L^{2(\\delta+1)}}^{2(\\delta+1)}\n\\le C_T.\n\\end{equation}\nIntegrating \\eqref{first_energy_inequality} over $(0,T)$, we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\\label{weighted_gradient_bound}\n\\int_0^T\\int_0^1\n|z|^{2\\delta}|z_x|^2\\,dx\\,dt\n\\le C_T\n\\end{equation}\nand\n\\begin{equation}\\label{high_power_bound}\n\\lambda\n\\int_0^T\n\\|z(t)\\|_{L^{4\\delta+2}}^{4\\delta+2}\\,dt\n\\le C_T.\n\\end{equation}\n\n\\noindent\n\\textbf{Step 2: An $H_0^1$-estimate.}\n\nTesting \\eqref{homotopy_fixed_point_equation} by $-z_{xx}$, and using\n\\eqref{H1_chain_rule}, we obtain\n\\begin{align}\\label{second_energy_identity}\n\\frac12\\frac{d}{dt}\\|z_x(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\n\\|z_{xx}(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n&=\n-\\lambda\n\\sum_{j=0}^{\\delta}\n\\int_0^1a_jz^jz_xz_{xx}\\,dx\n-\\lambda(\\xi(\\epsilon t)z,z_{xx})_{L^2}\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&\\qquad\n-\\lambda(P(t,\\cdot,z),z_{xx})_{L^2}\n-\\lambda(h,z_{xx})_{L^2}.\n\\end{align}\nFor $0\\le j\\le\\delta$, Young's inequality gives\n\\begin{align*}\n\\lambda\n\\left|\n\\int_0^1a_jz^jz_xz_{xx}\\,dx\n\\right|\n&\\le\nC\\lambda\n\\left(\n\\int_0^1|z|^{2j}|z_x|^2\\,dx\n\\right)^{1/2}\n\\|z_{xx}\\|_{L^2}\n\\\\\n&\\le\n\\eta\\|z_{xx}\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\nC_\\eta\\lambda^2\n\\int_0^1|z|^{2j}|z_x|^2\\,dx.\n\\end{align*}\nSince $|z|^{2j}\\le1+|z|^{2\\delta}$ for $0\\le j\\le\\delta$, and $0\\le\\lambda\\le1$, summing over $j$ gives\n\\begin{align}\\label{second_convection_estimate}\n\\lambda\n\\sum_{j=0}^{\\delta}\n\\left|\n\\int_0^1a_jz^jz_xz_{xx}\\,dx\n\\right|\n\\le\n\\eta\\|z_{xx}\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\nC_\\eta\\|z_x\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\nC_\\eta\n\\int_0^1|z|^{2\\delta}|z_x|^2\\,dx.\n\\end{align}\nHere $\\eta>0$ has been adjusted to account for the finite sum. For the feedback term, using \\eqref{uniform_xi_bound}, Young's inequality, $0\\le\\lambda\\le1$, and Poincaré's inequality, we have\n\\begin{align*}\n\\lambda\n\\big|(\\xi(\\epsilon t)z,z_{xx})_{L^2}\\big|\n\\le\nC\\lambda\\|z\\|_{L^2}\\|z_{xx}\\|_{L^2}\n&\\le\n\\eta\\|z_{xx}\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\nC_\\eta\\lambda^2\\|z\\|_{L^2}^2\n\\\\\n&\\le\n\\eta\\|z_{xx}\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\nC_\\eta\\|z_x\\|_{L^2}^2.\n\\end{align*}\nThus,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{second_feedback_estimate}\n\\lambda\n\\big|(\\xi(\\epsilon t)z,z_{xx})_{L^2}\\big|\n\\le\n\\eta\\|z_{xx}\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\nC_\\eta\\|z_x\\|_{L^2}^2.\n\\end{equation}\nFor the polynomial reaction term,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{second_reaction_estimate}\n\\lambda\n\\big|(P(t,\\cdot,z),z_{xx})_{L^2}\\big|\n\\le\n\\eta\\|z_{xx}\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\nC_\\eta\\lambda^2\n\\|P(t,\\cdot,z)\\|_{L^2}^2.\n\\end{equation}\nBy \\eqref{polynomial_representation_P}, we get $|P(t,x,z)|\n\\le C\\left(|z|+|z|^{2\\delta+1}\\right).$ Hence\n\\begin{equation}\\label{P_L2_estimate}\n\\|P(t,\\cdot,z)\\|_{L^2}^2\n\\le\nC\\left(\n\\|z(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\n\\|z(t)\\|_{L^{4\\delta+2}}^{4\\delta+2}\n\\right).\n\\end{equation}\nUsing $\\lambda^2\\le\\lambda$, \\eqref{first_uniform_bound}, and \\eqref{high_power_bound}, we get\n\\begin{align}\n\\lambda^2\n\\int_0^T\n\\|P(t,\\cdot,z)\\|_{L^2}^2\\,dt\n&\\le\nC\\lambda^2\n\\int_0^T\\|z(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\\,dt\n+\nC\\lambda^2\n\\int_0^T\n\\|z(t)\\|_{L^{4\\delta+2}}^{4\\delta+2}\\,dt\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&\\le\nC_T\n+\nC\\lambda\n\\int_0^T\n\\|z(t)\\|_{L^{4\\delta+2}}^{4\\delta+2}\\,dt\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&\\le C_T.\n\\label{P_integral_estimate}\n\\end{align}\nFor the forcing term, Young's inequality and\n\\eqref{uniform_coefficient_bounds} give\n\\begin{align}\\label{second_forcing_estimate}\n\\lambda\\big|(\\mathcal{Q},z_{xx})_{L^2}\\big|\n\\le\n\\eta\\|z_{xx}\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\nC_\\eta\\lambda^2\\|\\mathcal{Q}\\|_{L^2}^2\n\\le\n\\eta\\|z_{xx}\\|_{L^2}^2+C_\\eta.\n\\end{align}\nCombining\n\\eqref{second_energy_identity}--\\eqref{second_forcing_estimate}, and choosing $\\eta>0$ sufficiently small, we obtain\n\\begin{align}\\label{second_energy_inequality}\n\\frac{d}{dt}\\|z_x(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\n\\|z_{xx}(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n\\le{}&\nC\\|z_x(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\nC\\int_0^1|z|^{2\\delta}|z_x|^2\\,dx\n +\nC\\lambda^2\n\\|P(t,\\cdot,z)\\|_{L^2}^2\n+C.\n\\end{align}\nSince $z(0)=0$ in $H_0^1(0,1)$, we have $z_x(0)=0$ in $L^2(0,1)$. Applying Gronwall's inequality to\n\\eqref{second_energy_inequality}, and using\n\\eqref{weighted_gradient_bound} and\n\\eqref{P_integral_estimate}, we conclude that\n\\begin{equation}\\label{H1_H2_uniform_estimate}\n\\sup_{0\\le t\\le T}\n\\|z_x(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\n\\int_0^T\\|z_{xx}(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\\,dt\n\\le C_T.\n\\end{equation}\nBy Poincaré's inequality and the elliptic estimate\n$$\\|v\\|_{H^2(0,1)}\n\\le\nC\\|v_{xx}\\|_{L^2(0,1)},\n\\qquad\nv\\in H^2(0,1)\\cap H_0^1(0,1),$$\nwe obtain\n\\begin{equation}\\label{space_uniform_estimate}\n\\|z\\|_{L^\\infty(0,T;H_0^1(0,1))}\n+\n\\|z\\|_{L^2(0,T;H^2(0,1))}\n\\le C_T.\n\\end{equation}\n\n\\noindent\n\\textbf{Step 3: An estimate for $z_t$.}\n\nFrom \\eqref{homotopy_fixed_point_equation} and\n\\eqref{compact_form_nonlin},\n$$z_t=z_{xx}+\\lambda\n\\left(\n\\sum_{j=0}^{\\delta}a_jz^jz_x\n+\\xi(\\epsilon t)z\n+P(t,x,z)\n+\\mathcal{Q}\n\\right).$$\nUsing the one-dimensional embedding $H_0^1(0,1)\\hookrightarrow L^\\infty(0,1)$ and \\eqref{space_uniform_estimate}, for $0\\le j\\le\\delta$, we have\n\\begin{align*}\n\\int_0^T\n\\|z^jz_x\\|_{L^2}^2\\,dt\n\\le\n\\sup_{0\\le t\\le T}\n\\|z(t)\\|_{L^\\infty}^{2j}\n\\int_0^T\\|z_x(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\\,dt\n\\le C_T.\n\\end{align*}\nConsequently,\n$$\\lambda^2\n\\int_0^T\n\\left\\|\n\\sum_{j=0}^{\\delta}a_jz^jz_x\n\\right\\|_{L^2}^2\\,dt\n\\le C_T.$$\nMoreover, by \\eqref{uniform_xi_bound},\n$$\\lambda^2\n\\int_0^T\n\\|\\xi(\\epsilon t)z(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\\,dt\n\\le\nM_\\xi^2\n\\int_0^T\\|z(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\\,dt\n\\le C_T.$$\nBy \\eqref{P_integral_estimate},\n$$\\lambda^2\n\\int_0^T\n\\|P(t,\\cdot,z)\\|_{L^2}^2\\,dt\n\\le C_T.$$\nFinally, using $0\\le\\lambda\\le1$ and\n\\eqref{uniform_coefficient_bounds},\n$$\\lambda^2\n\\int_0^T\\|h(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\\,dt\n\\le\n\\int_0^T\\|h(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\\,dt\n\\le C_T.$$\nCombining these estimates with\n\\eqref{H1_H2_uniform_estimate}, we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\\label{time_derivative_uniform_estimate}\n\\|z_t\\|_{L^2(Q)}\n\\le C_T.\n\\end{equation}\nIt follows from\n\\eqref{space_uniform_estimate} and\n\\eqref{time_derivative_uniform_estimate} that\n$$\\|z\\|_{L^\\infty(0,T;H_0^1(0,1))}\n+\n\\|z\\|_{L^2(0,T;H^2(0,1))}\n+\n\\|z_t\\|_{L^2(Q)}\n\\le C_T,$$\nwhere $C_T$ is independent of $\\lambda\\in[0,1]$ and of the\ncorresponding fixed point $z$. Finally,\n\\begin{align*}\n\\|z\\|_{\\mathcal X_T}^{\\hat q}\n&=\n\\int_0^T\n\\|z(t)\\|_{H_0^1(0,1)}^{\\hat q}\\,dt\n\\le\nT\n\\left(\n\\sup_{0\\le t\\le T}\n\\|z(t)\\|_{H_0^1(0,1)}\n\\right)^{\\hat q}\n\\le C_T.\n\\end{align*}\nTherefore, $\\|z\\|_{\\mathcal X_T}\\le C_T.$ Thus, $\\widetilde{\\Phi}$ is bounded in $\\mathcal X_T$.\n\\end{proof}\nWe are now in a position to prove Theorem~\\ref{Thm_Soln_Trans_sys}\n\\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\\ref{Thm_Soln_Trans_sys}]\nBy Lemma~\\ref{lem:Phi_well_defined_cont_compact}, the mapping\n$$\\Phi:\\mathcal X_T\\times[0,1]\\longrightarrow\\mathcal X_T$$\nis continuous and compact. Moreover, setting $\\lambda=0$ in \\eqref{Phi_linear_problem} shows that $\\Phi(\\widetilde z,0)$ solves the homogeneous heat equation with zero initial and boundary data, \nso that\n$$\\Phi(\\widetilde z,0)=0\n\\qquad\n\\text{for every }\\widetilde z\\in\\mathcal X_T.$$\nBy Lemma~\\ref{lem:uniform_bound_fixed_points}, the set $\\widetilde{\\Phi}$ is bounded in $\\mathcal X_T$. Hence, by the Leray-Schauder fixed-point theorem, there exists $z\\in\\mathcal X_T$ such that $z=\\Phi(z,1)$. Setting $\\lambda=1$ and $\\widetilde z=z$ in \\eqref{Phi_linear_problem}, this fixed point is a solution of the original nonlinear closed-loop \nproblem \\eqref{Close_loop_z_eqn_expanded}. Furthermore, by the regularity established in Lemma~\\ref{lem:Phi_well_defined_cont_compact},\n$$z\\in\nL^2\\bigl(0,T;H^2(0,1)\\cap H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr)\n\\cap\nH^1\\bigl(0,T;L^2(0,1)\\bigr)\n\\cap\nC\\bigl([0,T];H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr).$$\nIt remains to establish the uniqueness of the solution. Let $z_1,z_2\\in\\mathcal X_T$ be two fixed points of\n$\\Phi(\\cdot,1)$. By the definition of $\\Phi$, both $z_1$ and $z_2$ solve the original nonlinear problem and satisfy\n$$z_i(t,0)=z_i(t,1)=0,\\qquad z_i(0,x)=0,\\qquad i=1,2.$$\nMoreover, by Lemma~\\ref{lem:Phi_well_defined_cont_compact},\n$$z_i\\in\nL^2\\bigl(0,T;H^2(0,1)\\cap H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr)\n\\cap\nH^1\\bigl(0,T;L^2(0,1)\\bigr)\n\\cap\nC\\bigl([0,T];H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr),$$\nfor $i=1,2$. In particular, by the one-dimensional Sobolev embedding, $z_1,z_2\\in L^\\infty(Q)$. Set $w:=z_1-z_2$. Then \n$$w(t,0)=w(t,1)=0,\n\\qquad\nw(0,x)=0,$$\nand $w$ satisfies\n\\begin{equation}\\label{difference_equation}\n\\begin{cases}\nw_t-w_{xx}\n=\n\\displaystyle\n\\sum_{j=0}^{\\delta}\na_j(t,x)\n\\left(\nz_1^j(z_1)_x-z_2^j(z_2)_x\n\\right)\n+\\xi(\\epsilon t)w\n\\\\\n\\hspace{3.6cm}\n+P(t,x,z_1)-P(t,x,z_2),\n& (t,x)\\in Q,\\\\\nw(t,0)=w(t,1)=0,\n& t\\in(0,T),\\\\\nw(0,x)=0,\n& x\\in(0,1).\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nTaking the $L^2(0,1)$-inner product of \\eqref{difference_equation} with $w$, we obtain, for almost every $t\\in(0,T)$,\n\\begin{align}\\label{difference_energy_identity}\n\\frac12\\frac{d}{dt}\\|w(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\n\\|w_x(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n={}&\n\\sum_{j=0}^{\\delta}\n\\int_0^1\na_j\n\\left(\nz_1^j(z_1)_x-z_2^j(z_2)_x\n\\right)w\\,dx\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&+\n(\\xi(\\epsilon t)w,w)_{L^2}\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&+\n(P(t,\\cdot,z_1)-P(t,\\cdot,z_2),w)_{L^2}.\n\\end{align}\nWe first estimate the convection terms. For $0\\le j\\le\\delta$,\n$$z_1^j(z_1)_x-z_2^j(z_2)_x=\\frac{1}{j+1}\n\\partial_x\\left(z_1^{j+1}-z_2^{j+1}\\right).$$\nTherefore, integration by parts gives\n\\begin{align*}\n\\int_0^1\na_j\n\\left(\nz_1^j(z_1)_x-z_2^j(z_2)_x\n\\right)w\\,dx\n=&\n-\\frac{1}{j+1}\n\\int_0^1\n(a_j)_x\n\\left(z_1^{j+1}-z_2^{j+1}\\right)w\\,dx\n\\\\\n&\\qquad \\qquad\n-\\frac{1}{j+1}\n\\int_0^1\na_j\n\\left(z_1^{j+1}-z_2^{j+1}\\right)w_x\\,dx.\n\\end{align*}\nThe boundary terms vanish because $w(t,0)=w(t,1)=0$. Put\n$$M:=\n\\max\\left\\{\n\\|z_1\\|_{L^\\infty(Q)},\n\\|z_2\\|_{L^\\infty(Q)}\n\\right\\}.$$\nUsing\n$$|r^{j+1}-s^{j+1}|\\le C_j\\left(|r|^j+|s|^j\\right)|r-s|,$$\nwe obtain $|z_1^{j+1}-z_2^{j+1}|\\le C_jM^j|w|\\le C_M|w|$. Since $a_j$ and $(a_j)_x$ are bounded in $L^\\infty(Q)$, it follows that\n\\begin{align*}\n\\left|\n\\int_0^1\na_j\n\\left(\nz_1^j(z_1)_x-z_2^j(z_2)_x\n\\right)w\\,dx\n\\right|\n\\le\nC_M\\|w\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\nC_M\\|w\\|_{L^2}\\|w_x\\|_{L^2}.\n\\end{align*}\nBy Young's inequality, for every $\\eta>0$,\n$$\\left|\n\\int_0^1\na_j\n\\left(\nz_1^j(z_1)_x-z_2^j(z_2)_x\n\\right)w\\,dx\n\\right|\n\\le\n\\eta\\|w_x\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\nC_{M,\\eta}\\|w\\|_{L^2}^2.$$\nSumming over $j=0,\\ldots,\\delta$ and choosing $\\eta>0$\nsufficiently small, we obtain\n\\begin{align}\\label{difference_convection_estimate}\n\\left|\n\\sum_{j=0}^{\\delta}\n\\int_0^1\na_j\n\\left(\nz_1^j(z_1)_x-z_2^j(z_2)_x\n\\right)w\\,dx\n\\right|\n\\le\n\\frac12\\|w_x\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\nC_M\\|w\\|_{L^2}^2.\n\\end{align}\nFor the feedback term, the uniform boundedness of $\\xi$ gives\n\\begin{align}\\label{difference_feedback_estimate}\n|(\\xi(\\epsilon t)w,w)_{L^2}|\n\\le\n\\|\\xi(\\epsilon t)w\\|_{L^2}\\|w\\|_{L^2}\n\\le\nM_\\xi\\|w\\|_{L^2}^2.\n\\end{align}\nIt remains to estimate the polynomial term. Recall that\n$$P(t,x,s)=-\\beta s^{2\\delta+1}+ \\sum_{k=1}^{2\\delta}P_k(t,x)s^k,$$\nwhere the coefficients $P_k$ are uniformly bounded in $Q$. Hence\n$$\\partial_sP(t,x,s)\n=\n-(2\\delta+1)\\beta s^{2\\delta}\n+\n\\sum_{k=1}^{2\\delta}\nk\\,P_k(t,x)s^{k-1}.$$\nConsequently,\n$$\\sup_{\\substack{(t,x)\\in Q\\\\ |s|\\le M}}\n|\\partial_sP(t,x,s)|\n\\le\nC\\left(1+M^{2\\delta}\\right)\n=:C_M.$$\nBy the mean value theorem,\n\\[\n|P(t,x,z_1)-P(t,x,z_2)|\n\\le\nC_M|z_1-z_2|\n=\nC_M|w|.\n\\]\nTherefore,\n\\begin{align}\\label{difference_reaction_estimate}\n\\left|\n(P(t,\\cdot,z_1)-P(t,\\cdot,z_2),w)_{L^2}\n\\right|\n\\le\nC_M\\|w\\|_{L^2}^2.\n\\end{align}\nCombining\n\\eqref{difference_energy_identity},\n\\eqref{difference_convection_estimate},\n\\eqref{difference_feedback_estimate}, and\n\\eqref{difference_reaction_estimate}, we obtain\n$$\\frac12\\frac{d}{dt}\\|w(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\n\\frac12\\|w_x(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n\\le\nC_M\\|w(t)\\|_{L^2}^2.$$\nAfter multiplying by $2$ and dropping the nonnegative gradient term, we get\n$$\\frac{d}{dt}\\|w(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n\\le\nC_M\\|w(t)\\|_{L^2}^2.$$\nSince both $z_1$ and $z_2$ are fixed points of $\\Phi(\\cdot,1)$, their initial conditions are zero. Hence $w(0)=z_1(0)-z_2(0)=0$. Gronwall's inequality therefore yields\n$$\\|w(t)\\|_{L^2}^2=0,\n\\qquad t\\in[0,T].$$\nThus $w\\equiv0$ in $Q$ and consequently $z_1=z_2$. This completes the proof of Theorem~\\ref{Thm_Soln_Trans_sys}.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\subsection{Proof of Theorem~\\ref{Regularity_of_soln}}\n\n\\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\\ref{Regularity_of_soln}]\nLet $T>0$, $0<\\epsilon T\\leq 1$, and\n$$\\bar u\\in C^1\\bigl([0,1];C^2([0,1])\\bigr),\n\\qquad\n\\bar u(\\tau,0)=\\bar u(\\tau,1)=0,\n\\quad \\tau\\in[0,1],$$\nand $\\xi\\in C\\left([0,1];\\mathcal L\\bigl(L^2(0,1),H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr)\\right).$\n%Let $T>0$ and let $\\epsilon>0$ be such that $0<\\epsilon T\\leq 1$. Assume that $\\bar u\\in C^1\\bigl([0,1];C^2([0,1])\\bigr), \\bar u(\\tau,0)=\\bar u(\\tau,1)=0$ for all $\\tau\\in[0,1],$ and $\\xi\\in C\\left([0,1];\\mathcal L\\bigl(L^2(0,1),H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr)\\right).$\nLet $z$ be the strong solution of\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Eq_Closed_loop_bootstrap}\n\\begin{cases}\nz_t(t)\n=\n\\mathcal A(\\epsilon t)z(t)\n+\n\\mathcal G_\\epsilon(t,z(t)),\n& t\\in(0,T),\\\\\nz(0)=0,\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nsatisfying\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Eq_Initial_regularities_z}\nz\\in\nL^2\\bigl(0,T;H^2(0,1)\\cap H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr)\n\\cap\nH^1\\bigl(0,T;L^2(0,1)\\bigr)\n\\cap\nC\\bigl([0,T];H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr).\n\\end{equation}\nSet $\\mathcal H:=L^2(0,1),\\mathcal V:=H_0^1(0,1), D:=H^2(0,1)\\cap H_0^1(0,1).$\nFor $\\tau\\in[0,1]$, define \n$$\\mathcal A(\\tau)v:=v_{xx}+p(\\tau,\\cdot)v_x+q(\\tau,\\cdot)v,\\quad \\text{and}\\quad D(\\mathcal A(\\tau))=D,$$\nwhere $p(\\tau,\\cdot):=-\\alpha\\bar u^\\delta(\\tau,\\cdot)$\nand $q(\\tau,\\cdot):=F'\\bigl(\\bar u(\\tau,\\cdot)\\bigr)-\n\\alpha\\delta\\bar u^{\\delta-1}(\\tau,\\cdot)\\bar u_x(\\tau,\\cdot).$ The remaining terms are collected in\n\\begin{align}\\label{Eq_Definition_G_epsilon_bootstrap}\n\\mathcal G_\\epsilon(t,z)\n={}&\n\\xi(\\epsilon t)z\n-\n\\alpha\n\\left(\n\\delta\\bar u^{\\delta-1}(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)z\n+\n\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\n\\binom{\\delta}{j}\nz^j\\bar u^{\\delta-j}(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\n\\right)z_x\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&-\n\\alpha\n\\left(\n\\sum_{j=2}^{\\delta}\n\\binom{\\delta}{j}\nz^j\\bar u^{\\delta-j}(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\n\\right)\n\\bar u_x(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)+\nF\\bigl(z+\\bar u(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\\bigr)\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&-\nF\\bigl(\\bar u(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\\bigr)\n-\nF'\\bigl(\\bar u(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\\bigr)z-\\epsilon\\bar u_\\tau(\\epsilon t,\\cdot).\n\\end{align}\nA sum over an empty index set is understood to be zero.\n\n\\noindent\n\\textbf{Step 1: Realization of $\\mathcal A(\\tau)$ in\n$\\mathcal V$.}\n\nLet $\\mathcal A_{\\mathcal V}(\\tau)$ denote the part of\n$\\mathcal A(\\tau)$ in $\\mathcal V$, namely,\n\\[\nD\\bigl(\\mathcal A_{\\mathcal V}(\\tau)\\bigr)\n:=\n\\left\\{\nv\\in D:\n\\mathcal A(\\tau)v\\in\\mathcal V\n\\right\\},\n\\qquad\n\\mathcal A_{\\mathcal V}(\\tau)v\n:=\n\\mathcal A(\\tau)v.\n\\]\nWe first show that\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Eq_Common_domain_Lambda}\nD\\bigl(\\mathcal A_{\\mathcal V}(\\tau)\\bigr)\n=\n\\Lambda,\n\\qquad\n\\tau\\in[0,1].\n\\end{equation}\n\nLet $v\\in D\\bigl(\\mathcal A_{\\mathcal V}(\\tau)\\bigr)$.\nThen $v\\in H^2(0,1)\\cap H_0^1(0,1)$ and $\\mathcal A(\\tau)v\\in H_0^1(0,1).$ Since $v_{xx}=\\mathcal A(\\tau)v-p(\\tau,\\cdot)v_x-q(\\tau,\\cdot)v$ and $p(\\tau,\\cdot),q(\\tau,\\cdot)\\in W^{1,\\infty}(0,1),$ the right-hand side belongs to $H^1(0,1)$. Consequently, $v_{xx}\\in H^1(0,1),$ and hence $v\\in H^3(0,1).$ Moreover, since $\\mathcal A(\\tau)v\\in H_0^1(0,1),$ we have\n$$\\mathcal A(\\tau)v(0)=\\mathcal A(\\tau)v(1)=0.$$\nThe boundary conditions on $\\bar u$ imply $p(\\tau,0)=p(\\tau,1)=0.$ Since $v(0)=v(1)=0$, the term $q(\\tau,\\cdot)v$ also vanishes at the boundary. Therefore,\n$\\mathcal A(\\tau)v\\big|_{x=0,1}=v_{xx}\\big|_{x=0,1},$\nand thus $v_{xx}(0)=v_{xx}(1)=0$. Hence $v\\in\\Lambda$.\n\nConversely, let $v\\in\\Lambda$. Then $v\\in H^3(0,1)\\cap H_0^1(0,1).$ Since $p(\\tau,\\cdot),q(\\tau,\\cdot)\\in W^{1,\\infty}(0,1),$ we have\n$$\\mathcal A(\\tau)v=v_{xx}+p(\\tau,\\cdot)v_x+q(\\tau,\\cdot)v\n\\in H^1(0,1).$$\nAt $x=0,1$, we have $v=0,v_{xx}=0, p(\\tau,\\cdot)=0.$\nHence\n$$\\mathcal A(\\tau)v(0)=\\mathcal A(\\tau)v(1)=0.$$\nTherefore, $\\mathcal A(\\tau)v\\in H_0^1(0,1),$ and thus $v\\in D\\bigl(\\mathcal A_{\\mathcal V}(\\tau)\\bigr).$ This proves \\eqref{Eq_Common_domain_Lambda}.\n\nWe next verify the regularity and sectoriality of the operator family.\nThe assumption\n$$\\bar u\\in C^1\\bigl([0,1];C^2([0,1])\\bigr)\\quad\\text{implies}\\quad p,q\\in C^1\\bigl([0,1];W^{1,\\infty}(0,1)\\bigr).$$\nConsequently,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Eq_A_C1_Lambda_V}\n\\tau\n\\longmapsto\n\\mathcal A_{\\mathcal V}(\\tau)\n\\in\nC^1\\bigl([0,1];\\mathcal L(\\Lambda,\\mathcal V)\\bigr).\n\\end{equation}\n\nLet $\\mathcal A_{0,\\mathcal V}$ denote the part of the Dirichlet Laplacian in $\\mathcal V$, namely, \n$\\mathcal A_{0,\\mathcal V}v=v_{xx}, D(\\mathcal A_{0,\\mathcal V})=\\Lambda.$\nThe operator $\\mathcal A_{0,\\mathcal V}$ is sectorial on\n$\\mathcal V$ and generates an analytic semigroup. Moreover, its\ngraph norm is equivalent to the $H^3(0,1)$-norm on $\\Lambda$. For $v\\in\\Lambda$,\n$$\\bigl\\|p(\\tau,\\cdot)v_x+q(\\tau,\\cdot)v\\bigr\\|_{H^1}\\leq C\\|v\\|_{H^2},$$\nwhere $C>0$ is independent of $\\tau\\in[0,1]$. Furthermore, for every $\\eta>0$,\n$$\\|v\\|_{H^2}\\leq\\eta\\|v\\|_{H^3}+C_\\eta\\|v\\|_{H^1}.$$\nUsing the equivalence of the graph norm, we obtain\n$$\\bigl\\|p(\\tau,\\cdot)v_x+q(\\tau,\\cdot)v\\bigr\\|_{H^1}\\leq \\eta\\|\\mathcal A_{0,\\mathcal V}v\\|_{H^1}+C_\\eta\\|v\\|_{H^1}.$$\nThus, the lower-order operator\n$$v\\longmapsto p(\\tau,\\cdot)v_x+q(\\tau,\\cdot)v$$\nis relatively $\\mathcal A_{0,\\mathcal V}$-bounded with relative bound zero, uniformly with respect to $\\tau\\in[0,1]$. By the standard perturbation theorem for sectorial operators, the family $\\left\\{\\mathcal A_{\\mathcal V}(\\tau)\\right\\}_{\\tau\\in[0,1]}$\nis uniformly sectorial on $\\mathcal V$.\n\nCombining this fact with \\eqref{Eq_Common_domain_Lambda} and\n\\eqref{Eq_A_C1_Lambda_V}, the standard nonautonomous maximal $L^2$-regularity theorem for uniformly sectorial operators with a common domain applies to\n$$t\\longmapsto\\mathcal A_{\\mathcal V}(\\epsilon t).$$\n\\noindent\n\\textbf{Step 2: Regularity of the nonlinear term.}\n\nFrom \\eqref{Eq_Initial_regularities_z}, $z\\in C\\bigl([0,T];H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr),$ and hence $z\\in L^\\infty\\bigl(0,T;H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr).$ By the one-dimensional Sobolev embedding\n$$H_0^1(0,1)\\hookrightarrow L^\\infty(0,1),$$\nwe obtain\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Eq_z_Linfty_Q}\nz\\in L^\\infty(Q),\n\\qquad\nQ:=(0,T)\\times(0,1).\n\\end{equation}\nFurthermore, $z_x\\in L^\\infty\\bigl(0,T;L^2(0,1)\\bigr)$ and $z_{xx}\\in L^2(Q).$ Expanding $F$ and collecting the coefficients, we can write\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Eq_G_structural_form}\n\\mathcal G_\\epsilon(t,z)\n=\n\\xi(\\epsilon t)z\n+\n\\sum_{j=1}^{\\delta}\nb_j(\\epsilon t,x)z^jz_x\n+\n\\sum_{k=1}^{2\\delta+1}\nc_k(\\epsilon t,x)z^k\n+\nh_\\epsilon(t,x),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $h_\\epsilon(t,x):=-\\epsilon\\bar u_\\tau(\\epsilon t,x).$ The coefficients $b_j$ and $c_k$ are finite sums of products of $\\bar u$ and $\\bar u_x$. Therefore,\n$$\\sup_{\\tau\\in[0,1]}\n\\left(\n\\|b_j(\\tau,\\cdot)\\|_{W^{1,\\infty}}\n+\n\\|c_k(\\tau,\\cdot)\\|_{W^{1,\\infty}}\n\\right)\n\\leq C.$$\nSince\n$\\xi\\in C\\left([0,1]; \\mathcal L\\bigl(L^2(0,1),H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr)\\right)$ and $[0,1]$ is compact, \n$$\\sup_{\\tau\\in[0,1]}\\|\\xi(\\tau)\\|_{\\mathcal L(L^2,H_0^1)}<\\infty.$$\nTherefore,\n$$\\|\\xi(\\epsilon t)z(t)\\|_{H_0^1}\\leq C\\|z(t)\\|_{L^2},$$\nand consequently\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Eq_Feedback_H01}\n\\xi(\\epsilon\\cdot)z\n\\in\nL^2\\bigl(0,T;H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr).\n\\end{equation}\nFor $1\\leq k\\leq 2\\delta+1$, $\\partial_x(c_kz^k)=(\\partial_xc_k)z^k+kc_kz^{k-1}z_x.$ Using \\eqref{Eq_z_Linfty_Q} and $z_x\\in L^\\infty\\bigl(0,T;L^2(0,1)\\bigr),$ we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Eq_Polynomial_H1}\nc_k(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)z^k\n\\in\nL^2\\bigl(0,T;H^1(0,1)\\bigr).\n\\end{equation}\nWe next consider the derivative nonlinearities. For $1\\leq j\\leq\\delta$, $\\partial_x(z^jz_x)=jz^{j-1}z_x^2+z^jz_{xx}.$ By \\eqref{Eq_z_Linfty_Q}, $z^jz_{xx}\\in L^2(Q).$ It remains to prove that $z_x^2\\in L^2(Q).$ For almost every $t\\in(0,T)$, $z_x(t,\\cdot)\\in H^1(0,1).$ No homogeneous boundary condition on $z_x$ is required. The one-dimensional Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality on $H^1(0,1)$ gives\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Eq_GN_zx}\n\\|z_x(t)\\|_{L^4}^4\n\\leq\nC\\|z_x(t)\\|_{L^2}^3\n\\|z_{xx}(t)\\|_{L^2}\n+\nC\\|z_x(t)\\|_{L^2}^4.\n\\end{equation}\nIntegrating \\eqref{Eq_GN_zx} over $(0,T)$ and using the\nCauchy-Schwarz inequality, we obtain\n\\begin{align*}\n\\int_0^T\n\\|z_x(t)\\|_{L^4}^4\\,dt\n&\\leq\nC\n\\|z_x\\|_{L^\\infty(0,T;L^2)}^3\n\\int_0^T\n\\|z_{xx}(t)\\|_{L^2}\\,dt+CT\\|z_x\\|_{L^\\infty(0,T;L^2)}^4\n\\\\\n&\\leq\nC\\sqrt{T}\\,\n\\|z_x\\|_{L^\\infty(0,T;L^2)}^3\n\\|z_{xx}\\|_{L^2(Q)}+CT\\|z_x\\|_{L^\\infty(0,T;L^2)}^4<\\infty.\n\\end{align*}\nHence $z_x\\in L^4(Q),z_x^2\\in L^2(Q).$ It follows that $z^jz_x\\in L^2\\bigl(0,T;H^1(0,1)\\bigr).$\nSince $b_j(\\tau,\\cdot)\\in W^{1,\\infty}(0,1),$\nwe conclude that\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Eq_Derivative_H1}\nb_j(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)z^jz_x\n\\in\nL^2\\bigl(0,T;H^1(0,1)\\bigr).\n\\end{equation}\nFinally, $h_\\epsilon=-\\epsilon\\bar u_\\tau(\\epsilon t,\\cdot)\\in L^\\infty\\bigl(0,T;H^1(0,1)\\bigr).$\nSince $\\bar u(\\tau,0)=\\bar u(\\tau,1)=0$ for every $\\tau\\in[0,1],$ differentiating these identities with respect to $\\tau$ gives\n$$\\bar u_\\tau(\\tau,0)=\\bar u_\\tau(\\tau,1)=0.$$\nConsequently,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Eq_Forcing_H01}\nh_\\epsilon\n\\in\nL^2\\bigl(0,T;H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr).\n\\end{equation}\nThe remaining nonlinear terms also have zero boundary trace. Indeed, $z^jz_x=0$ at $x=0,1,$ because $z=0$ there, and similarly $z^k=0$ at $x=0,1$. Combining\n\\eqref{Eq_Feedback_H01},\n\\eqref{Eq_Polynomial_H1},\n\\eqref{Eq_Derivative_H1}, and\n\\eqref{Eq_Forcing_H01}, we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Eq_G_H01}\n\\mathcal G_\\epsilon(\\cdot,z)\n\\in\nL^2\\bigl(0,T;H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr).\n\\end{equation}\n\\noindent\n\\textbf{Step 3: Maximal $L^2$-regularity and identification of the\nsolution.}\n\nSet $f(t):=\\mathcal G_\\epsilon(t,z(t)).$\nBy \\eqref{Eq_G_H01}, $f\\in L^2(0,T;\\mathcal V).$ Consider the linear nonautonomous problem in $\\mathcal V$:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Eq_Auxiliary_linear_problem}\n\\begin{cases}\nw_t(t)\n=\n\\mathcal A_{\\mathcal V}(\\epsilon t)w(t)\n+\nf(t),\n& t\\in(0,T),\\\\\nw(0)=0.\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nSince $0\\in(\\mathcal V,\\Lambda)_{1/2,2},$ the nonautonomous maximal $L^2$-regularity theorem yields a unique solution satisfying\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Eq_w_maximal_regularity}\nw\\in\nH^1(0,T;\\mathcal V)\n\\cap\nL^2(0,T;\\Lambda).\n\\end{equation}\nSince $\\mathcal V\\hookrightarrow\\mathcal H,\\Lambda\\hookrightarrow D,$ we also have $w\\in\nH^1(0,T;\\mathcal H)\\cap L^2(0,T;D).$ Thus, $w$ is a strong solution in $\\mathcal H$ of\n$$w_t(t)=\\mathcal A(\\epsilon t)w(t)+f(t),\\qquad w(0)=0.$$\nOn the other hand, $z$ is a strong solution in $\\mathcal H$ of the same linear problem because $f(t)=\\mathcal G_\\epsilon(t,z(t)).$ Let $y:=w-z.$ Then $y\\in\nH^1(0,T;\\mathcal H)\\cap L^2(0,T;D)$ and\n\\[\n\\begin{cases}\ny_t(t)\n=\n\\mathcal A(\\epsilon t)y(t),\n& t\\in(0,T),\\\\\ny(0)=0.\n\\end{cases}\n\\]\nTaking the $L^2(0,1)$-inner product with $y(t)$, we obtain, for almost every $t\\in(0,T)$,\n\\begin{align*}\n\\frac12\n\\frac{d}{dt}\n\\|y(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n&=\n-\\|y_x(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\n\\int_0^1\np(\\epsilon t,x)\ny_x(t,x)y(t,x)\\,dx\n\\\\\n&\\quad+\n\\int_0^1\nq(\\epsilon t,x)\n|y(t,x)|^2\\,dx.\n\\end{align*}\nSince $p$ and $q$ are uniformly bounded, Young's inequality gives\n$$\\frac12\n\\frac{d}{dt}\n\\|y(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n\\leq\n-\\frac12\n\\|y_x(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n+\nC\\|y(t)\\|_{L^2}^2.\n$$\nDropping the nonpositive term, we obtain\n$$\\frac{d}{dt}\n\\|y(t)\\|_{L^2}^2\n\\leq\nC\\|y(t)\\|_{L^2}^2.$$\nSince $y(0)=0$, Gronwall's inequality yields $y\\equiv0.$ Therefore, we get $w=z.$\nCombining this identity with \\eqref{Eq_w_maximal_regularity}, we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Eq_z_improved_regularity}\nz\\in\nH^1(0,T;\\mathcal V)\n\\cap\nL^2(0,T;\\Lambda).\n\\end{equation}\nIn particular, $z_t\\in L^2\\bigl(0,T;H_0^1(0,1)\\bigr)$ and $z\\in L^2(0,T;H^3(0,1)).$ Finally, the parabolic trace theorem applied to\n\\eqref{Eq_z_improved_regularity} gives\n$$z\\in\nC\\left(\n[0,T];\n(\\mathcal V,\\Lambda)_{1/2,2}\n\\right).$$\nBy the standard real-interpolation theorem for Sobolev spaces with\nboundary conditions,\n$$\\bigl(H_0^1(0,1),\\Lambda\\bigr)_{1/2,2}\n=\nH^2(0,1)\\cap H_0^1(0,1).$$\nIndeed, the interpolation space has Sobolev order $2$. At this regularity level, the zeroth-order boundary condition is retained, whereas the second-order trace is not defined for general $H^2(0,1)$-functions, and hence the condition $v_{xx}=0$ is not inherited. Therefore,\n$$z\\in\nC\\bigl(\n[0,T];\nH^2(0,1)\\cap H_0^1(0,1)\n\\bigr).$$\nConsequently, $z(t)\\in D(\\mathcal A(\\epsilon t))$ for every $t\\in[0,T].$ This completes the proof.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n %\\bibliographystyle{abbrv}\n %\\bibliography{xyz}\n\n\\begin{thebibliography}{10}\n\n\\bibitem{abdou2010}\nM.~A. Abdou and A.~A. Soliman.\n\\newblock New applications of variational iteration method for generalized\nburgers-huxley equation.\n\\newblock {\\em Physica D}, 239:621--631, 2010.\n\n\\bibitem{akram2025feedback}\nW.~Akram, M.~Bag, and M.~T. Mohan.\n\\newblock Feedback stabilizability of a generalized {B}urgers-{H}uxley\nequation with kernel around a non-constant steady state.\n\\newblock {\\em J. Math. Anal. Appl.}, 556(2):Paper No. 130237, 46, 2026.\n\n\\bibitem{bag2026boundary}\nM.~Bag, W.~Akram, and M.~T. Mohan.\n\\newblock Boundary stabilizability of generalized burgers--huxley equation\nwith memory.\n\\newblock {\\em Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems}, pages 1--45,\n2026.\n\n\\bibitem{Shirshendu20}\nS.~Chowdhury, M.~Biswas, and R.~Dutta.\n\\newblock Approximate controllability of the {F}itz{H}ugh-{N}agumo\nequation in one dimension.\n\\newblock {\\em J. Differential Equations}, 268(7):3497--3563, 2020.\n\n\\bibitem{Coddington1955}\nE.~A. Coddington and N.~Levinson.\n\\newblock {\\em Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations}.\n\\newblock McGraw-Hill, New York, 1955.\n\n\\bibitem{coron2007}\nJ.-M. Coron.\n\\newblock {\\em Control and Nonlinearity}, volume 136 of {\\em Mathematical\nSurveys and Monographs}.\n\\newblock American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2007.\n\n\\bibitem{Coron2004}\nJ.-M. Coron and E.~Tr{\\'e}lat.\n\\newblock Global steady-state controllability of one-dimensional\nsemilinear heat equations.\n\\newblock {\\em SIAM journal on control and optimization}, 43(2):549--569,\n2004.\n\n\\bibitem{Coron06}\nJ.-M. Coron and E.~Tr\\'elat.\n\\newblock Global steady-state stabilization and controllability of 1{D}\nsemilinear wave equations.\n\\newblock {\\em Commun. Contemp. Math.}, 8(4):535--567, 2006.\n\n\\bibitem{fernandez2014}\nE.~Fern{\\'a}ndez-Cara and S.~Guerrero.\n\\newblock Global carleman inequalities for parabolic systems and\napplications to controllability.\n\\newblock {\\em SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization},\n45(4):1395--1446, 2006.\n\n\\bibitem{Furshikov_notapprox}\nA.~V. Fursikov and O.~Y. Imanuvilov.\n\\newblock On controllability of certain systems simulating a fluid flow.\n\\newblock In {\\em Flow control ({M}inneapolis, {MN}, 1992)}, volume~68 of\n{\\em IMA Vol. Math. Appl.}, pages 149--184. Springer, New York, 1995.\n\n\\bibitem{fursikov1996}\nA.~V. Fursikov and O.~Y. Imanuvilov.\n\\newblock {\\em Controllability of Evolution Equations}, volume~34 of {\\em\nLecture Notes Series}.\n\\newblock Seoul National University, 1996.\n\n\\bibitem{Kato1966}\nT.~Kato.\n\\newblock {\\em Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators}, volume 132 of\n{\\em Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften}.\n\\newblock Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1966.\n\n\\bibitem{khalil02}\nH.~K. Khalil.\n\\newblock {\\em Nonlinear Systems}.\n\\newblock Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 3 edition, 2002.\n\n\\bibitem{khattak2007}\nA.~J. Khattak.\n\\newblock A computational meshless method for the generalized\nburgers-huxley equation.\n\\newblock {\\em Applied Mathematics and Computation}, 188:371--378, 2007.\n\n\\bibitem{lions1988}\nJ.-L. Lions.\n\\newblock {\\em Exact Controllability, Stabilization and Perturbations for\nDistributed Systems}.\n\\newblock SIAM, 1988.\n\n\\bibitem{Liu10}\nW.~Liu.\n\\newblock {\\em Elementary feedback stabilization of the linear\nreaction-convection-diffusion equation and the wave equation}, volume~66\nof {\\em Math\\'ematiques \\& Applications (Berlin) [Mathematics \\&\nApplications]}.\n\\newblock Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010.\n\n\\bibitem{mohan2021gbh}\nM.~T. Mohan et~al.\n\\newblock Well-posedness and asymptotic behavior for generalized\nburgers--huxley equations.\n\\newblock {\\em Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - Series B},\n26(7):3651--3680, 2021.\n\n\\bibitem{Mohan2021}\nM.~T. Mohan and A.~Khan.\n\\newblock On the generalized burgers-huxley equation: Existence,\nuniqueness, regularity, global attractors and numerical studies.\n\\newblock {\\em Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B}, 26(7):3943--3988, 2021.\n\n\\bibitem{Schmidt06}\nM.~Schmidt and E.~Tr\\'elat.\n\\newblock Controllability of {C}ouette flows.\n\\newblock {\\em Commun. Pure Appl. Anal.}, 5(1):201--211, 2006.\n\n\\bibitem{singh2023boundary}\nR.~P. Singh and M.~T. Mohan.\n\\newblock Boundary feedback stabilization of generalized burgers--huxley\nequations.\n\\newblock {\\em Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications}, 2023.\n\\newblock to appear.\n\n\\bibitem{zuazua2005}\nE.~Zuazua.\n\\newblock Propagation, observation, and control of waves approximated by\nfinite difference methods.\n\\newblock {\\em SIAM Review}, 47(2):197--243, 2005.\n\n\\end{thebibliography}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\\end{document}\n\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091169,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31969"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31969"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Marco Merkli"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Alain Joye and Marco Merkli"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"The contact temperature of arbitrary quantum states"},"comments":{"kind":"null"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"quant-ph math-ph math.MP"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"An intuitive scheme to assign a temperature to an arbitrary state of a quantum system is to investigate the heat flow resulting from the coupling to a thermometer. We introduce a simple model of a universal thermometer with the following property. When it is prepared in a Gibbs equilibrium state at inverse temperature $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$ and brought into thermal contact with a system in any state, the heat flow between the system and thermometer vanishes for a unique value of $\\beta$. We call this value the contact temperature $\\beta_{\\rm op}\\in\\mathbb R$ of the system state. The thermometer is universal in that it yields a unique contact temperature for arbitrary states of finite dimensional quantum systems."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:11:32 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:11:32 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Joye","Alain",""],["Merkli","Marco",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Joye\",\n \"Alain\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Merkli\",\n \"Marco\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: ThermoPaper-ArXiv-Version1.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[12pt]{article}\n\\setlength{\\textwidth}{16cm}\n\\usepackage[margin=0.9in]{geometry}\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}\n\\usepackage{bm}\n\\usepackage{bbm}\n\\usepackage{stmaryrd}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{amsthm}\n\\usepackage{amssymb}\n\\usepackage[dvipsnames]{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{ulem}\n\\usepackage{url}\n\\usepackage{comment}\n\\usepackage{braket}\n\n\n\n\n\\newcommand{\\s}{{\\rm S}}\n\\newcommand{\\rr}{{\\rm R}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\tr}{\\mathrm{Tr}}\n\\newcommand{\\blue}[1]{{\\color{blue}#1}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\h}{{\\mathcal H}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\ve}{\\varepsilon}\n\n\\newcommand{\\bbbone}{\\mathchoice {\\rm 1\\mskip-4mu l} {\\rm 1\\mskip-4mu l}\n{\\rm 1\\mskip-4.5mu l} {\\rm 1\\mskip-5mu l}}\n\\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}\n\\newtheorem{prop}{Proposition}\n\\newtheorem*{prop*}{Proposition}\n\\newtheorem{lem}{Lemma}\n\\newtheorem{cor}{Corollary}\n\\newtheorem*{rmk}{Remark}\n\\newtheorem*{rmks}{Remarks}\n\n\n\\newcommand{\\av}[1]{\\langle{#1}\\rangle}\n\\renewcommand{\\a}{{\\rm A}}\n\\renewcommand{\\b}{{\\rm B}}\n\\renewcommand{\\ss}{{\\rm S}}\n\\newcommand{\\vve}{{\\vec\\ve}}\n\\newcommand{\\vvp}{{\\vec p}}\n\n\\renewcommand{\\top}{T_{\\rm op}}\n\\newcommand{\\bop}{\\beta_{\\rm c}}\n\n\n\n\n\n\\usepackage{authblk}\n\\title{The contact temperature of \narbitrary quantum states}\n\n\\author[1]{Alain Joye\\footnote{alain.joye@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr}}\n\\author[2]{Marco Merkli\\footnote{merkli@mun.ca}}\n\\affil[1]{Univ.~Grenoble Alpes\n\nCNRS, Institut Fourier\n\nF-38000 Grenoble France\n\\medskip\n}\n\\affil[2]{Department of Mathematics and Statistics\n\nMemorial University of Newfoundland\n\n\nSt.~John’s, NL, Canada A1C 5S7\n}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\n\\begin{abstract} \nAn intuitive scheme to assign a temperature to an arbitrary state of a quantum system is to investigate the heat flow resulting from the coupling to a thermometer. We introduce a simple model of a universal thermometer with the following property. When it is prepared in a Gibbs equilibrium state at inverse temperature $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$ and brought into thermal contact with a system in any state, the heat flow between the system and thermometer vanishes for a unique value of $\\beta$. We call this value the {\\it contact temperature} $\\bop\\in\\mathbb R$ of the system state. The thermometer is universal in that it yields a unique contact temperature for arbitrary states of finite dimensional quantum systems. \n\n\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\n\n\n\n\\section{Introduction}\\label{sec:intro}\n\nThe equilibrium state of a quantum system whose dynamics is generated by a Hamiltonian $H$ is given by the Gibbs density matrix \n$$\n\\gamma_\\beta = \\frac{e^{-\\beta H}}{{\\rm Tr}\\, e^{-\\beta H}}\\, ,\n$$\nwhere $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$ is the (inverse) equilibrium temperature. The Gibbs density matrix is obtained as the maximizer of the entropy under the constraint of a fixed mean energy. Different approaches have been proposed to extend the notion of temperature to general quantum states $\\rho$, see the review \\cite{Casas}. Among them is the effective temperature $\\beta^*$ of $\\rho$ defined as the Gibbs equilibrium temperature resulting in the same average energy, determined by ${\\rm Tr}(H\\rho ) = {\\rm Tr}(H \\gamma_{\\beta^*})$. The effective $\\beta^*$ is the unique minimizer of the function $\\beta\\mapsto S(\\rho | \\gamma_\\beta)$, the von Neumann relative entropy of $\\rho$ with respect to the Gibbs state. An approach parallel to standard (equilibrium) thermodynamics is developed in \\cite{Alipour}, where a non-equilibrium temperature is constructed as the partial derivative of the von Neumann entropy with respect to an internal energy. In the current work we follow a more concrete, operational strategy for defining the temperature, in line with some previous work \\cite{Muschik}. There a contact temperature is defined for classical thermodynamical systems. The idea is to couple the system in a non equilibrium state to a thermostat in equilibrium and to analyze for which thermostat temperature the total heat exchange through the contact boundary vanishes. In the current paper we develop this idea for quantum systems. We assign a temperature to arbitrary states $\\rho$ of any (finite dimensional) quantum system by coupling it to a thermometer or thermostat, an (infinite dimensional) quantum system in thermal equilibrium. The contact with the thermometer is mediated by an interaction producing equal transition probabilities between all system+thermometer states at a fixed total energy. We show that this results in a single value of the thermometer temperature before the coupling, for which the heat flow vanishes. This value is the effective contact temperature of the system. The contact temperature can be positive or negative, as is the case for virtual temperatures in thermal machines \\cite{BLPS} and effective temperatures of a related approach \\cite{LPB}, where the authors introduce two temperatures $\\beta_c$ and $\\beta_h$ (cold and hot) associated to a quantum state $\\rho$, defined by the ability of the system in the state $\\rho$ to either furnish or extract energy when coupled to reservoirs.\n\n\n\n\n\\subsection{Outline of approach and of main results}\n\nWe now explain our main results in a somewhat informal way and we present the rigorous aspects in the coming sections. The system, called $\\a$, is a $d$-level quantum system with a Hamiltonian $H_\\a$ having non-degenerate energies $\\ve_1 <\\cdots <\\ve_d$. The thermometer, or system $\\b$, has Hamiltonian $H_\\b$ with eigenvalues $\\eta_k=k/N$, $k=0,1,\\ldots$ and $N$ large. $\\a$ and $\\b$ are coupled by an energy exchange interaction described by a {\\it thermal process} $U$, a unitary acting on the total complex $\\a+\\b$, having the commutation property\n$$\n[U,H_\\a+H_\\b] =0.\n$$\nAs a consequence of the commutation property, a change in the energy of $\\a$ is entirely due to a change in the energy of $\\b$ and vice versa. Given a state (density matrix) $\\rho$ of $\\a$, our main quantity of interest is the change in the energy of $\\a$ due to the contact with $\\b$ in the Gibbs state\n$$\n\\tau_\\beta=\\frac{e^{-\\beta H_\\b}}{{\\rm Tr}e^{-\\beta H_\\b}},\n$$\nwhich is given by\n$$\nQ_\\a(\\beta) = \\tr_{\\a\\b}{\\big(U(\\rho\\otimes\\tau_{\\beta}) U^* H_\\a\\big)} - \\tr_\\a{(\\rho H_\\a)}.\n$$\nThe state $\\rho\\otimes\\tau_\\beta$ of A+B before the contact is factorized, and so the energy change may be interpreted as heat. We call $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ the energy (or heat) flow resulting from the contact with the thermometer. The thermometer Gibbs state $\\tau_\\beta$ is defined only for $\\beta>0$ as ${\\rm Tr}e^{-\\beta H_\\b}=\\infty$ for $\\beta\\le 0$, because $\\b$ has infinitely many energy levels. Thus in the above definition of $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ we consider $\\beta>0$. As expected, the flow vanishes if $\\a$ is in the Gibbs state at the same temperature as $\\b$: for $\\rho=\\gamma_\\beta$ we have $Q_\\a(\\beta)=0$, which follows from the commutation property $[U,H_\\a+H_\\b]=0$.\n\nIn order to guarantee a good thermal contact between $\\a$ and $\\b$, the two systems should be able to exchange energy. In the theory of open quantum systems, particularly in weak coupling regimes, well-coupledness is often stated as a `Fermi Golden Rule' condition. While the interaction in the present work is not scaled by any coupling constant, our well-coupledness condition shares the same two central physical aspects with the Fermi Golden Rule. Namely, the system and thermometer (reservoir) should have compatible Bohr energies (energy differences) and the interaction should allow energy transitions in tandem, within the system and the reservoir. In the current setup the total energy is conserved by $U$, so that energetic transitions in $\\a$ must be accompanied by equal and opposite energetic transitions in $\\b$, that is, the Bohr energies of $\\a$ should also be Bohr energies of $\\b$. Given that the thermometer spectrum is $k/N$, $k=0,1,\\ldots$ this leads us to the following assumption.\n\\smallskip\n\n(i) For all $\\ell,m$, the difference $|\\ve_\\ell-\\ve_m|$ must be a multiple of $1/N$. \n\\smallskip\n\n\\noindent\nIn order to allow for energy exchange transitions, the unitary $U$ must have non-vanishing matrix elements between energy eigenstates of $H_\\a+H_\\b$. We consider a thermal contact for which all equal energy transitions are {\\it equiprobable}. Namely, we assume that\n\\smallskip\n\n(ii) The transition probabilities induced by $U$, between any two equal energy eigenstates of the uncoupled Hamiltonian $H_\\a+H_\\b$, are the same. \n\\smallskip\n\n\\noindent \nThe equal probability property (ii) is an expression of {\\it randomness}, which we think is natural for complex or `generic' systems. Namely, we show in Section \\ref{sec:model} that for the purpose of the heat flow, the property (ii) is equivalent to taking the unitary $U$ as a random operator, drawn according to the unique, bi-invariant probability measure on the unitary group (the Haar measure). \nBesides its spectrum, the manner how the thermometer couples to systems $\\s$ is an equally important part of its definition. In our model this manner is encoded in the operator $U$ which depends on the spectrum of $\\s$ due to the condition (ii). Part of the definition of the thermometer, therefore, is that it will couple to any system in a fashion which produces equal probability energy transitions, irrespective of the detailed nature of $\\s$. \n\n\n\n\n\nEven a small change in the system energies can alter the Bohr resonance condition (i) and simultaneously the structure of $U$. This may lead to a decreased value of the mathematical expression of the heat flow. For example, take energies $\\ve_\\ell$ such that (i) is satisfied with a resulting $Q_\\a>0$. An infinitesimal change of the energies into new ones with the property that for all $\\ell\\neq m$, the difference $|\\ve'_\\ell-\\ve'_m|$ is not an exact multiple of $1/N$, implies that $U'$ satisfying condition (ii) with the new energies, reduces to (a direct sum of) pure phases and consequently $Q'_\\a=0$. The flow is thus not continuous in the system energies, when one only considers (ii) without (i). Physically, however, a drastic change in the heat flow under infinitesimal alteration of the energy spectrum of $\\s$ is unrealistic. The conditions (i) and (ii) work together on a physical level. Together they eliminate this unnatural instability. Still, given an arbitrary energy spectrum $\\{\\ve_\\ell\\}$ of $\\s$, the rationality condition (i) will not be verified in general. However, for $N$ large enough, the condition is satisfied to an arbitrary degree of precision. It turns out, as we show below, that the heat flow $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ {\\it does not depend on $N$}. Therefore the condition (i) is not a physically relevant restriction on $\\s$. \n\n\n\nIn conlcusion, jointly the assumptions (i) and (ii) give a universal thermometer model, yielding a unique contact temperature associated to any state $\\rho$ of $\\s$, regardless of the physical nature of $\\s$.\n\n\n{\\bf Thermodynamic results.} Our first result is Theorem \\ref{Qunbounded}, in which we obtain the following explicit expression for the heat flow, \n$$\nQ_\\a(\\beta)=\\sum_{1\\leq j < k \\leq d}\\frac{e^{-\\beta (\\ve_k -\\ve_j)}}{k(k-1)}p_j \\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}(\\ve_k-\\ve_l)- \\sum_{k=2}^{d}\\frac{p_k}{k}\\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}(\\ve_k-\\ve_l),\n$$\nwhere the $p_j$ are the ($H_\\a$ energy) populations of the state $\\rho$. The explicit form of the heat flow allows for a direct discussion of its properties (see Section \\ref{sec:model}). Our main question now is whether there is a unique root (zero) $\\bop$ of the function $Q_\\a(\\beta)$. We show that (unless $\\rho$ is the ground state or the top excited state of $H_\\a$), $\\beta\\mapsto Q(\\beta)$ is continuous and strictly decreasing in $\\beta$ (for all $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$) and that $Q(\\beta)<0$ for $\\beta\\rightarrow\\infty$ while\n$$\nQ_\\a(0) :=\\lim_{\\beta\\rightarrow 0_+} Q_\\a(\\beta) = \\sum_{j=1}^d \\ve_j(\\frac1d -p_j).\n$$\nConsequently, if $Q_\\a(0)\\ge 0$, then there exists a unique $\\bop\\ge 0$ which makes the flow vanish. The root $\\bop$ is called the contact temperature of $\\rho$. The existence and uniqueness of $\\bop\\ge 0$ is the content of our Theorem \\ref{thm2}.\n\nAs is readily visible from the explicit expression above, $Q_\\a(0)$ is negative for very legitimate states $\\rho$ (populations $p_j$). In this case the monotonicity implies that the function $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ does not have any non-negative root. How should we assign a temperature to states for which $Q_\\a(0)<0$ ? The physical meaning of this inequality is that the system $\\a$ in the state $\\rho$ will transfer heat to $\\b$ even if $\\b$ is infinitely hot, $\\beta=0_+$ (measured according to the Gibbs equilibrium temperature $T=1/\\beta$). In order to define the contact temperature in the case when $Q_\\a(0)<0$, the first impulse is to use the above explicit formula for $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ for all values of $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$ | even though it was derived for $\\beta>0$. The monotonicity and the boundary values $\\lim_{\\beta\\rightarrow-\\infty}Q_\\a(\\beta)=\\infty$ and $\\lim_{\\beta\\rightarrow\\-\\infty}Q_\\a(\\beta)<0$ would then guarantee the existence of a single root in $(-\\infty,0)$ for $Q_\\a(0)<0$. However, this extension of $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ to negative $\\beta$ is not physical. Indeed, $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ is supposed to represent the energy difference of a finite system before and after the contact with the thermometer; so $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ must be bounded above by $\\ve_d-\\ve_1$ and cannot have the above stated boundary condition at $\\beta=-\\infty$. The origin of this inconsistency is that the Gibbs state $\\tau_\\beta$ is ill defined for $\\beta\\le 0$, and therefore so is the defining expression of $Q_\\a(\\beta)$.\n\n\\begin{figure}[h!]\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=.9\\linewidth]{Figure.pdf}\n\\caption{The energy flow $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ (see also the definition \\eqref{EvarA}), is a strictly decreasing, convex function of $\\beta>0$ and has a well defined limit value $Q_\\a(0)$ as $\\beta\\rightarrow 0_+$. If $Q_\\a(0)>0$ then there is a unique root $\\bop>0$ (blue curve). If $Q_\\a(0)=0$ then the unique root is $\\bop=0$ (green curve). If $Q_\\a(0)<0$ then there is no root in $[0,\\infty)$ (red curve). However, by extending the function $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ to a function $\\bar Q(\\beta)$ also defined for $\\beta<0$, we have a unique root $\\bop<0$ of the extended function $\\bar Q(\\beta)$. This is the (negative) contact temperature associated to the system state. The question mark indicates that one has to decide what the extension should be. We argue it should be the flow resulting from the coupling to a thermometer having finitely many levels, which is in the Gibbs equilibrium state with $\\beta<0$, when the number of levels is taken to infinity.}\n \\label{Fig.1}\n\\end{figure}\n\nThe physically correct approach is to consider first a finite-level thermometer for which the Gibbs state is defined for all $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$, also for $\\beta<0$, and then take the limit of infinitely many levels. The {\\it finite-level} thermometer is defined by the Hamiltonian $H_{\\b,K}$ acting on $\\mathbb C^{K+1}$ with eigenvalues $\\eta_k=k/N$, $k=0,1,\\ldots,K$. The state $\\tau_{\\beta,K}=e^{-\\beta H_{\\b,K}}/{\\tr}e^{-\\beta H_{\\b,K}}$ is a well defined density matrix for all $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$ and determines the heat flow\n$$\nQ_{\\a,K}(\\beta) = \\tr{\\big(U(\\rho\\otimes\\tau_{\\beta,K}) U^* H_\\a\\big)} - \\tr{(\\rho H_\\a)},\n$$\nwhere the trace is over $\\mathbb C^d\\otimes \\mathbb C^{K+1}$ (system plus thermometer Hilbert space) and $U$ depends on $K$, as it implements equiprobable energy transitions of $H_\\a+H_{\\b,K}$. We show in Theorem \\ref{thm:QbetainR} that the $\\infty$-level limit\n$$\n\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta) =\\lim_{K\\rightarrow\\infty} Q_{\\a,K}(\\beta)\n$$\nexists and is given by \n$$\n\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta) = \n\\left\\{\n\\begin{array}{ll}\nQ^+_\\a(\\beta):=\\displaystyle\\sum_{1\\leq j < k \\leq d}\\frac{e^{-\\beta (\\ve_k -\\ve_j)}p_j-p_k}{k(k-1)} \\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}(\\ve_k-\\ve_l), & \\quad \\beta>0,\\\\ [15pt]\nQ^-_\\a(\\beta) := \\displaystyle\\sum_{1\\le k< j\\le d} \\frac{e^{-\\beta(\\ve_k-\\ve_j)}p_j - p_k}{(d-k+1)(d-k)} \\sum_{l=k+1}^d(\\ve_k-\\ve_l), & \\quad \\beta\\leq 0.\n\\end{array}\n\\right.\n$$\nThis is a continuous extension of $Q_\\a(\\beta)$, originally defined for $\\beta>0$, now extended to $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$. The extended function is strictly decreasing (unless $\\rho$ is the ground or top excited state of $H_\\a$) and satisfies $|\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta)|\\leq \\ve_d-\\ve_1$ for all $\\beta\\in \\mathbb R$. It has a unique root $\\bop\\in\\mathbb R$ which coincides with the previous non-negative root of $Q_\\a$ in case $Q_\\a(0)\\ge 0$, and it also yields a unique negative root which is defined to be the contact temperature of states $\\rho$ for which $Q_\\a(0)<0$. \n\\medskip\n\n{\\bf Structural results.} The heat flow $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ is determined by the reduction to the system part alone, of a thermal process ($U$) acting on the system+thermometer complex. We study this structure in a more general setting in Sections \\ref{sec:eflow} and \\ref{secRedQChannels}. In the latter section, we consider a bipartite system with Hilbert space $\\h\\otimes\\h_\\rr$ (`system plus reservoir') with $\\dim\\h=d<\\infty$, $\\dim\\h_\\rr\\le \\infty$, having a non-interacting Hamiltonian $H+H_\\rr$. We take a unitary map $V$ on $\\h\\otimes\\h_\\rr$ such that $[H+H_\\rr, V]=0$ (thermal process). We define the completely positive and trace preserving (CPTP) map acting on operators $X\\in\\mathcal B(\\h)$ on the system, by \n$$\n\\Phi_\\beta(X) = {\\rm Tr}_\\rr\\big(V(X\\otimes\\tau_\\beta)V^*\\big),\n$$\nwhere $\\tau_\\beta\\propto e^{-\\beta H_\\rr}$ is the Gibbs state of $\\rr$ (and $\\beta>0$). Suppose that the eigenvalues $\\ve_j$ of $H$ are simple. Due to the conservation of total energy by $V$, the thermal channel $\\Phi_\\beta$ leaves the subspace $\\mathcal D$ of diagonal operators (in the eigenbasis of $H$) invariant, and it leaves the off-diagonal operators $\\mathcal O$ invariant as well (see Lemma \\ref{phiprop}). $\\Phi_\\beta$ has thus the block decomposition \n$$\n\\Phi_\\beta = \\Phi_\\beta|_{\\mathcal D}\\oplus\\Phi_\\beta|_{\\mathcal O}.\n$$\nDenote by $\\psi_j$ the eigenbasis of the system Hamiltonian $H$. The probability of transition $\\psi_{j'}\\rightarrow \\psi_j$ in the system, due to the contact with $\\rr$ (mediated by $V$), is given by\n$$\nG_{jj'} (\\beta)= {\\rm Tr}\\Big(|\\psi_j\\rangle\\langle\\psi_j| \\Phi_\\beta\\big(|\\psi_{j'}\\rangle\\langle \\psi_{j'}|\\big)\\Big).\n$$\nThis defines a $d\\times d$ matrix $G(\\beta)=(G_{jj'}(\\beta))$ with $G_{jj'}(\\beta)\\ge 0$ and $\\sum_{j=1}^d G_{jj'}(\\beta)=1$ for all $j'$, which represents the restriction $\\Phi_\\beta|_{\\mathcal D}$. So $G(\\beta)$ is a stochastic matrix, called the stochastic matrix associated to the quantum channel $\\Phi_\\beta$. The vector $v_\\beta\\in{\\mathbb R}^d$ with components $\\propto e^{-\\beta\\ve_j}$, $j=1,\\ldots,d$ represents the system equilibrium (Gibbs) density matrix $\\propto e^{-\\beta H}$. It is a fixed point of the stochastic matrix, $G(\\beta)v_\\beta=v_\\beta$. It follows from a Perron-Frobenius argument (see Corollary \\ref{cor1}) that if $G_{jj'}(\\beta)>0$ for all $j,j'$ and if all the Bohr energies $\\ve_j-\\ve_k$ of $H$ are distinct ($j\\neq k$), then the eigenvalue $1$ of $\\Phi_\\beta$ is simple (eigenvector $v_\\beta$) and all other eigenvalues have modulus strictly less than $1$. These general properties hold in particular for the specific model of the thermometer coupled to the system.\n\n\nWe show in Proposition \\ref{gjjp} that for the system-thermometer model, the heat flow and the stochastic matrix are related for $\\beta>0$ as,\n$$\nQ_\\a(\\beta) = \\vve \\cdot G(\\beta) \\vvp -\\vve\\cdot\\vvp, \n$$\nwhere $\\vve=(\\ve_1,\\ldots,\\ve_{d})^T$ and $\\vvp=(p_1,\\ldots,p_d)^T$ are the column vectors in $\\mathbb R^{d}$ whose entries are the energies of $H_\\a$ and populations of $\\rho$, and where $G(\\beta)$ is the $d\\times d$ stochastic matrix associated to $\\Phi_\\beta$. Moreover, the matrix elements of $G(\\beta)$ are given by\n$$\nG_{j j'}(\\beta) =\\sum_{s=\\max\\{j,j'\\}}^{d}\\frac{1}{s}\\big(e^{-\\beta (\\ve_s-\\ve_{j'})}-e^{-\\beta (\\ve_{s+1}-\\ve_{j'})}\\big)\\ \\ \\ \\text{with \\ }\\ e^{-\\beta \\ve_{d+1}}=0,\n$$\nfrom which we see directly that $G_{jj'}(\\beta)>0$, and the eigenvalues of $G(\\beta)$ are strictly positive. The general theory of reduced thermal channels, as outlined above, then implies the following result (Theorem \\ref{applithm}): If all nonzero Bohr energies $\\ve_j-\\ve_k$ of $H_\\a$ are distinct, then $\\Phi_\\beta|_{\\mathcal D}$ has a simple eigenvalue $1$ with associated spectral projection $|v_\\beta\\rangle\\langle v_0|$ ($v_0$ is the vector in $\\mathbb C^d$ with elements all equal to $1$) and all other eigenvalues of $\\Phi_\\beta|_{\\mathcal D}$, as well as all eigenvalues of $\\Phi_\\beta|_{\\mathcal O}$, have modulus strictly less than $1$. The said spectral property implies that the repeated contact of the system with fresh thermometers at temperature $\\beta$, resulting in the repeated application of $\\Phi_\\beta$ to any initial state $\\rho$, will drive the system to the Gibbs state $\\gamma_\\beta=e^{-\\beta H}/{\\rm Tr}e^{-\\beta H}$ at the temperature of the thermometers. This in turn means that the contact temperature $\\bop^{(k)}$ of $\\rho^{(k)}=\\Phi_\\beta^k(\\rho)$ satisfies $\\lim_{k\\rightarrow\\infty}\\bop^{(k)}=\\beta$. We discuss the details of this dynamical process of approach to equilibrium in Section \\ref{sec:appreq}. \n\n\n\n \n\\section{Energy flow between system and thermometer}\n\\label{sec:model}\n\n\nLet $\\a$ be a quantum system defined on the Hilbert space $\\h_\\a=\\mathbb C^{d}$ with Hamiltonian \n\\begin{equation}\nH_\\a = \\sum_{j=1}^{d} \\ve_j |\\psi_j^\\a\\rangle\\langle\\psi_j^\\a|,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere the $\\ve_j$ and $\\psi_j^\\a$ are the energies and energy eigenstates. We assume\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item[{\\bf (ND)}]\nThe energies are ordered, $\\ve_1 < \\ve_2<\\cdots<\\ve_{d}\n$ and non-degenerate. \n\\end{itemize}\nStates of the system $\\a$ are density matrices $\\rho$ on the system Hilbert space $\\h_\\a$ (non-negative operators of unit trace). \nThe equilibrium state at temperature $T=1/\\beta>0$ is given by the Gibbs density matrix\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{AGibbs}\n\\gamma_{\\beta}=\\frac{e^{-\\beta H_\\a}}{Z_{\\a}},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $Z_\\a={\\rm Tr}e^{-\\beta H_\\a}$ is the partition function. We call this $\\beta$ (or $T=1/\\beta$) the {\\it equilibrium temperature}. \n\n\nThe Hamiltonian of the bath $\\b$, also called the thermometer, is given by\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{7}\nH_\\b = \\sum_{k=0}^{\\infty} \\sum_{m=1}^{m_\\b}\\eta_k |\\psi^\\b_{k, m}\\rangle\\langle\\psi^\\b_{k,m}|= \\sum_{k=0}^{\\infty} \\eta_k P_k^\\b,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere the $\\eta_k\\ge0$ are the eigenvalues, all having degeneracy $1\\leq m_\\b <\\infty$ and where $P_k^\\b$ is the (rank $m_\\b$) spectral projection associated to $\\eta_k$. The vectors $\\{\\psi_{k,m}^\\b\\}$ form an orthonormal basis of the (infinite-dimensional) bath Hilbert space $\\h_\\b$, and the domain of $H_\\b$ is the subspace ${\\rm dom}(H_\\b):=\\{\\Psi\\in \\h_\\b \\, :\\, \\sum_{k=0}^{\\infty} \\sum_{m=1}^{m_\\b}|\\langle\\psi_{k,m}^\\b|\\Psi\\rangle|^2\\eta_k^2<\\infty\\}$. We take the spectrum of the bath to be equally spaced, with small gaps,\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item[{\\bf (S)}]\n$\\eta_k=\\frac{k}{N}$, $k\\in \\mathbb N\\cup\\{0\\}$ for an integer $N$. Moreover, the system energies satisfy $\\ve_s = \\ve_1+\\frac{l_s}{N}$ for some integers $l_s$, $s=1,\\ldots,d$, with $0=l_1<l_2<\\cdots<l_d$.\n\\end{itemize}\n\nAs $N(\\ve_s-\\ve_1)=l_s\\ge s-1$ we must have $N\\ge\\max_{2\\le s\\le d}\\frac{s-1}{\\ve_s-\\ve_1}$. In fact, we are interested in taking $N$ very large ($\\rightarrow\\infty$), so that $\\rm B$ has the characteristics of a macroscopic (reservoir) system. The part of condition (S) saying that the Bohr energies $\\ve_s-\\ve_{s'}$ of $\\a$ are multiples of the basic Bohr energy $1/N$ of the thermometer $\\b$ guarantees that $\\a$ and $\\b$ are able to exchange energy which causes an energy flow. The thermal equilibrium state of $\\b$ is given by\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{thermoB}\n\\tau_{\\beta} =\\frac{e^{-\\beta H_\\b}}{Z_{\\b}}, \\ \\ \\beta>0,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $Z_{\\b}=\\tr (e^{-\\beta H_\\b})$ and $\\beta$ is the reservoir equilibrium temperature. The joint system $\\a+\\b$ is described by the Hilbert space $\\h_{\\a\\b}=\\h_\\a\\otimes\\h_\\b$. Its uncoupled Hamiltonian (dropping $\\otimes \\bbbone$ and $\\bbbone\\otimes$ from the notation) is\n$$\nH_{\\a\\b}= H_\\a+H_\\b,\n$$\nwith domain $\\h_\\a\\otimes {\\rm dom}(H_\\b)$. \nThe interaction between $\\a$ and $\\b$ is given by a thermal process (thermal quantum operation) $U$, which is a unitary operator on $\\h_{\\a\\b}$ satisfying\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{m1}\n[U, H_{\\a\\b}]=0.\n\\end{equation}\nThe energy flow $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ is defined as the difference of the energy of $\\a$ after and before the interaction with $\\b$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{EvarA}\nQ_\\a(\\beta) = \\tr{\\big(U(\\rho\\otimes\\tau_{\\beta}) U^* H_\\a\\big)} - \\tr{(\\rho H_\\a)}.\n\\end{equation}\nThe first trace is over $\\h_{\\a\\b}$, the second one over $\\h_\\a$. The flow \\eqref{EvarA} is invariant under translations of $H_\\a$ by $\\alpha \\mathbb I$ for $\\alpha\\in \\mathbb R$. Due to \\eqref{m1} and the invariance of the trace under unitary conjugation, we have $\\tr(U(\\rho\\otimes\\tau_\\beta)U^*(H_\\a+H_\\b))= \\tr(\\rho H_\\a)+\\tr(\\tau_\\beta H_\\b)$. This shows that $U(\\rho\\otimes\\tau_\\beta)U^*H_\\b$ has finite trace and that we have $Q_A(\\beta)+Q_B(\\beta)=0$, where $Q_B(\\beta) = \\tr{(U(\\rho\\otimes\\tau_{\\beta}) U^* H_\\b)} - \\tr{(\\tau_{\\beta} H_\\b)}$. If $Q_\\a(\\beta)>0$ then $\\a$ receives energy due to the interaction with $\\b$. In the opposite case $\\a$ gives energy to $\\b$.\n\n\nWe introduce a genericity assumption on the thermal process $U$ which can be formulated in two equivalent ways: either in terms of uniformity or in terms of randomness. We show in Theorem \\ref{Qunbounded} that they are equivalent, for the purpose of the energy flow. The genericity assumption in terms of uniformity is:\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item[{\\bf (G)}]\nThe transition probability induced by $U$, between any two equal energy eigenstates of the uncoupled Hamiltonian $H_{\\a\\b}$, are the same.\n\\end{itemize}\nDenoting the distinct eigenvalues of $H_{\\a\\b} = H_\\a+H_\\b$ by $E_\\ell$, $\\ell\\in \\mathbb N$ we have the spectral representation\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{m3'}\nH_{\\a\\b} = \\sum_{\\ell=0}^\\infty E_\\ell P_\\ell.\n\\end{equation}\nThe $P_\\ell$ are the eigenprojections with $\\dim P_\\ell=g_\\ell\\ge 1$, where $g_\\ell$ is the (finite) degeneracy of the eigenvalues $E_\\ell$. The Hilbert space is partitioned into spectral subspaces \n$$\n\\h_{\\a\\b} = \\bigoplus_{\\ell=0}^\\infty \\h_{\\a\\b}^{(\\ell)},\\qquad \\h_{\\a\\b}^{(\\ell)} = {\\rm Ran}P_\\ell.\n$$ \nDue to \\eqref{m1} we have \n$U=\\bigoplus_{\\ell =0}^\\infty U^{(\\ell)}$ for unitaries $U^{(\\ell)}$ on $\\h_{\\a\\b}^{(\\ell)}$.\nThe genericity assumption in terms of randomness is the following:\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item[\\bf (R)] The $U^{(\\ell)}$ are independent random unitaries for different $\\ell$. For any fixed $\\ell$, $U^{(\\ell)}$ is distributed according to the Haar measure on the group of unitaries acting on $\\h_{\\a\\b}^{(\\ell)}$. \n\\end{itemize}\nThe Haar measure is the unique probability measure on the unitary group that is invariant under left and right multiplication by any unitary matrix. \n\\medskip\n \n Under the assumption {\\bf (R)} the energy flow \\eqref{EvarA} is a random quantity $Q_A(\\beta)=Q_\\a(\\beta,\\omega)$, where $\\omega$ indicates the randomness parameter. The next result gives an explicit form of the flow and shows that the average (expectation), $\\mathbb E[Q_\\a(\\beta,\\omega)]$ is {\\it the same} as the $Q_\\a(\\beta)$, \\eqref{EvarA} obtained under the genericity assumption {\\bf (G)}. \n\n\n\\begin{thm}[Explicit form of the energy flow]\n\\label{Qunbounded}\nAssume that either {\\bf (G)} or {\\bf (R)} hold. Let $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ denote the flow \\eqref{EvarA} in the former case, and let $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ denote the expectation of the flow \\eqref{EvarA} in the latter case. Then we have for any $\\beta>0$,\n\\begin{align}\\label{qabeta}\nQ_\\a(\\beta)&=\\sum_{1\\leq j < k \\leq d}\\frac{e^{-\\beta (\\ve_k -\\ve_j)}}{k(k-1)}p_j \\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}(\\ve_k-\\ve_l)- \\sum_{k=2}^{d}\\frac{p_k}{k}\\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}(\\ve_k-\\ve_l).\n \\end{align}\nMoreover, \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{qa0}\nQ_\\a(0) :=\\lim_{\\beta\\rightarrow 0_+} Q_\\a(\\beta) = \\sum_{j=1}^d \\ve_j(\\frac1d -p_j).\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{thm}\n\nWe prove Theorem \\ref{Qunbounded} in Section \\ref{sec:proothm1}.\n\\medskip\n\n{\\bf Discussion and remarks.} (i) It is manifest from \\eqref{qabeta} that the flow $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ is independent of the spectral gap $1/N$ of $\\b$ as well as the bath multiplicity $m_\\b$ (see \\eqref{7}). It can be written equivalently as \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{qabeta'}\nQ_\\a(\\beta)=\\sum_{1\\leq j < k \\leq d}\\frac{e^{-\\beta (\\ve_k -\\ve_j)}p_j-p_k}{k(k-1)} \\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}(\\ve_k-\\ve_l).\n\\end{equation}\n \n\n(ii) As the $\\ve_k$ are ordered, \\eqref{qabeta} is the difference of two non-negative terms, one depending on $\\beta$, the other not. The sign of $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ is thus determined by the relative size of these two terms, and $Q_\\a(\\beta)=0$ when the two are equal. \n\n(iii) The first term in \\eqref{qabeta} does not depend on $p_d$, the population of the most excited state. Is is strictly positive unless $p_d=1$, in which case it vanishes. The second term in \\eqref{qabeta} which is subtracted from the first one, does not depend on the ground state population $p_1$. It is strictly positive unless $p_1=1$, in which case it vanishes.\n\n(iv) The expression \\eqref{qabeta'} shows that $Q_A(\\beta)>0$ if $e^{\\beta\\ve_k}p_k$ is decreasing in $k$ and $Q_A(\\beta)<0$ if $e^{\\beta\\ve_k}p_k$ is increasing in $k$. For $e^{\\beta\\ve_k} p_k$ constant in $k$, {\\it i.e.}~$p_k=e^{-\\beta \\ve_k}/Z_\\a$ (Gibbs state) we have $Q_\\a(\\beta)=0$. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\\section{The contact temperature}\n\\label{sec:contt}\n\n\nSuppose the flow $Q_\\a(\\beta)$, given by \\eqref{EvarA} for $\\beta>0$, has a unique root $\\bop>0$. Then this root is the contact temperature of the state $\\rho$ of $\\a$. The function $\\beta\\mapsto Q_\\a(\\beta)$ has the limit \\eqref{qa0} as $\\beta\\rightarrow 0_+$. Physically, $Q_\\a(0)$ is the energy flow of the system $\\a$ (positive for an inflow of energy) caused by the contact with a thermometer $\\b$ which has infinite equilibrium temperature $T=1/\\beta=\\infty$. The second law of thermodynamics says that energy will flow from a hotter body to a colder body | if both bodies are in (or close to) thermal equilibrium. In this situation we must have $Q_\\a(0)>0$. However, if the state $\\rho$ of $\\a$ is {\\it not} close to equilibrium, then there is no reason to expect $Q_\\a(0)>0$ and indeed, \\eqref{qa0} characterizes all $\\rho$ with $Q_\\a(0)<0$. Such $\\rho$ are `far from equilibrium' and they violate the second law of equilibrium thermodynamics | the system $\\a$ in such a state will give energy when coupled to a thermometer in equilibrium at arbitrarily high temperature. This is counterintuitive only if we follow the erroneous instinct to apply the second law of thermodynamics to systems far from equilibrium.\n\\smallskip\n\n{\\bf Two extreme cases:~ground and most excited states.} The energy flow associated to the ground state $\\rho=|\\psi^\\a_1\\rangle\\langle\\psi^\\a_1|$ is \n$$\nQ_\\a(\\beta) = \\sum_{k=2}^d \\frac{e^{-\\beta (\\ve_k-\\ve_1)}}{k(k-1)} \\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}(\\ve_k-\\ve_l)>0, \n$$\nwhich is strictly positive for all $\\beta>0$ and satisfies $\\lim_{\\beta\\rightarrow\\infty}Q_\\a(\\beta)=0$. So it makes sense to associate $\\bop=\\infty$ to the ground state of $\\a$. For the most excited state $\\rho=|\\psi^\\a_d\\rangle\\langle\\psi^\\a_d|$, \\eqref{qabeta} gives \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{extst}\nQ_\\a(\\beta) = -\\frac1d\\sum_{l=1}^{d-1}(\\ve_d-\\ve_l)<0. \n\\end{equation}\nThis is a strictly negative constant, independent of $\\beta$ and it has no root. We will see in Theorem \\ref{thmQbar} that it is natural to assign $\\bop=-\\infty$ to the most excited state.\n\n\n\\medskip\n\nWe show in the next two sections that there is a finite $\\bop\\in\\mathbb R$ for {\\it any} state $\\rho$ other than the ground and top excited states. Moreover, $\\bop>0$ for $Q_\\a(0)>0$ and $\\bop<0$ for $Q_\\a(0)<0$, while $Q_\\a(0)=0$ corresponds to $\\bop=0$.\n\n\n\n\\subsection{Positive contact temperature}\n\nAs discussed above, $Q_\\a(0)\\ge 0$ is a consequence of the second law of thermodynamics {\\rm if} the state $\\rho$ is close to equilibrium. Here we assign a $\\bop\\ge 0$ to any state $\\rho$ with $Q_\\a(0)\\ge 0$.\n\n\n\n\\begin{thm}[Existence and regularity of non-negative contact temperature]\n\\label{thm2} Let $\\rho$ be any state of $\\a$ other than the ground state or the most excited state of $H_\\a$.\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item[{\\rm (i)}] If $Q_\\a(0)>0$ then there exists a unique $\\bop>0$ such that $Q_\\a(\\bop)=0$. \n\nMoreover, $\\bop$ is a real analytic function of the populations of $\\rho$, that is of the probability vector $\\{p_j\\}_{j=1}^d$, on the open simplex ${\\mathcal S}=\\{ (p_1, p_2, \\dots, p_d)\\in (\\mathbb R_+\\backslash\\{0\\})^d\\ | \\sum_{j=1}^dp_j=1 \\}$.\n\n\n\\item[{\\rm (ii)}] If $Q_\\a(0)=0$ then $\\bop=0$ is the unique root of $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ in $[0,\\infty)$.\n\\end{itemize}\n\\end{thm}\n\n{\\bf Passive and active states.} Consider a Hamiltonian $H={\\rm diag}(E_1,\\ldots,E_d)$, with possibly degenerate energies. A state $\\rho$ is called passive if and only if $\\tr(\\rho H)\\le \\tr(V\\rho\\, V^* H)$ for all unitaries $V$. If $\\rho$ is not a passive state, then it is called an active state. One can show that $\\rho$ is passive if and only if $\\rho={\\rm diag}(p_1,\\ldots,p_d)$ is diagonal in the $H$ basis and $E_j\\le E_k\\Rightarrow p_j\\ge p_k$ \\cite{KouKou}. For our model, it follows from \\eqref{qa0} and the fact that the eigenvalues $\\ve_j$ of $H_\\a$ are ordered (see the condition (ND)), that $Q_\\a(0)\\ge 0$ for all passive states, see the Remark (iv) below Theorem \\ref{Qunbounded} for $\\beta=0$.\n\\begin{cor}\n\\label{pass/act:corollary}\nLet $\\rho$ be a passive state other than the ground state of $H_\\a$. Then $\\bop> 0$. There are active states for which $\\bop>0$. \n\\end{cor}\n{\\bf Example.} One may rewrite \\eqref{qa0} as\n$$\nQ_\\a(0) = \\sum_{j=1}^{d-1} \\Big(p_j-\\frac 1d\\Big)(\\ve_d-\\ve_j).\n$$\nFor a qubit ($d=2$) we have $Q_\\a(0)\\ge 0 \\Leftrightarrow p_1\\ge p_2$, with equivalence of the equalities. So $\\bop\\ge 0$ is equivalent with a diagonal $\\rho$ being a passive state. For $d=3$, $Q_\\a(0)=(p_1-\\frac13)(\\ve_3-\\ve_1)+(p_2-\\frac13)(\\ve_3-\\ve_2)$. By choosing $p_2>p_1$ and $\\ve_1<\\ve_2<\\ve_3$ such that $Q_\\a(0)>0$ we obtain an active state $\\rho={\\rm diag}(p_1,p_2,1-p_1-p_2)$ for which $\\bop>0$. In particular, any $p_1,p_2$ with $\\frac13<p_1<p_2$ will give such an active state.\n\n\n\\medskip\n\n{\\bf Proof of Theorem \\ref{thm2}.} The proof of Theorem \\ref{thm2} is simple. Viewing $Q_\\a(\\beta)$, \\eqref{qabeta} as a function of $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$, we have for $p_1\\neq 1$, $p_d\\neq 1$,\n$$\n\\lim_{\\beta\\rightarrow -\\infty} Q_\\a(\\beta) = \\infty,\\qquad \\lim_{\\beta\\rightarrow \\infty} Q_\\a(\\beta) = - \\sum_{k=2}^{d}\\frac{p_k}{k}\\sum_{\\ell=1}^{k-1}(\\ve_k-\\ve_\\ell)<0.\n$$\nConsequently as the function $\\beta\\mapsto Q_\\a(\\beta)$ is continuous it must have at least one root in $\\mathbb R$. This root is actually unique, because the function is strictly decreasing. In fact, it follows directly from \\eqref{qabeta} that for $n=1,2,\\ldots$\n(and $p_1\\neq 1$, $p_d\\neq 1$),\n\\begin{align}\n(-1)^n\\partial_\\beta^n Q_\\a(\\beta)>0.\n\\end{align}\nWe see directly that the unique root satisfies $\\bop>0\\Leftrightarrow Q_\\a(0)>0$ | see also Fig.~\\!\\ref{Fig.1}. \n\nLet us turn to the regularity of $\\bop$ in the probability vector $\\mathbf p:=\\{p_j\\}_{j=1}^d$ for $Q_\\a(0)>0$. We write $Q_\\a(\\mathbf p,\\beta)$ when we consider $\\mathbf p$ as a variable. The expression \\eqref{qabeta} gives the extension of $Q_\\a(\\mathbf p,\\beta)$ to $]0,1[^d\\times \\mathbb R^*_+$ and being linear in $\\mathbf p$, this function admits an analytic extension to $\\mathbb C^d\\times \\mathbb C$. By the argument above, for any $\\mathbf p\\in ]0,1[^d$, there exists a unique $\\beta(\\mathbf p)>0$ such that $Q_\\a(\\mathbf p,\\beta(\\mathbf p))=0$. The analytic implicit function theorem (see {\\it e.g.} \\cite{D}, Chap. X, \\S 2, (10.2.1) and (10.2.4)) implies that the map $]0,1[^d\\ni \\mathbf p\\mapsto \\beta(\\mathbf p)$ is real analytic. Restricting this function $\\beta$ to $\\mathcal S\\subset ]0,1[^d$ by expressing one $p_k$ as a function of the others, we get a real analytic function which coincides with $\\bop(\\mathbf p)$.\n\\hfill \\qed\n\\medskip\n\n{\\it Remark:} As seen in point (iv) after Theorem \\ref{Qunbounded} we have $Q_\\a(\\mathbf p_{\\beta_0},\\beta_0)=0$ for any $\\beta_0>0$, where we use the notation of the proof of Theorem \\ref{thm2}, with $(\\mathbf p_\\beta)_k=e^{-\\beta \\ve_k}/Z_\\a$, $k=1,\\dots, d$ representing the Gibbs thermal distribution. As $\\mathbf p\\mapsto Q_\\a(\\mathbf p,\\beta_0)$ is linear in $\\mathbf p$, the set of all probability distributions $\\mathbf p\\in\\bar{\\mathcal S}$ associated to the same contact temperature $\\beta_0$, $\\bop^{-1}(\\{\\beta_0\\})=\\{\\mathbf p_{\\beta_0}+ \\ker Q_\\a(\\cdot , \\beta_0)\\}\\cap \\bar {\\mathcal{S}}$, is a section of the simplex $\\bar{\\mathcal S}$ of dimension $d-2$.\n\n\n\\subsection{\\bf Negative contact temperature}\n\nWe now consider the situation $Q_\\a(0)<0$ which is complementary to that treated in Theorem \\ref{thm2}. \nTo derive the existence of $\\bop\\ge 0$ in Theorem \\ref{thm2} we argued that we may consider $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ as a function of $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$ | simply extending the expression \\eqref{qabeta} of Theorem \\ref{Qunbounded} to all $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$. For $\\beta>0$ the quantity $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ has a physical meaning (difference of energy of $\\a$ before and after the effect of the thermometer). But for $\\beta<0$ it does not. Even though the expression \\eqref{qabeta} is well defined (even analytic) for all $\\beta$, as discussed above, it is unphysical for $\\beta<0$.\n\n\n\\smallskip\n\nConsider then a truncated version of the thermometer Hamiltonian given in \\eqref{7},\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{f1}\nH_{\\b,K} = \\sum_{k=0}^K \\eta_k |\\psi^\\b_k\\rangle\\langle\\psi_k^\\b|,\\qquad \\eta_k = \\frac kN,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $K\\in\\mathbb N\\cup\\{0\\}$, and which acts on the truncated Hilbert space $\\mathbb C^{K+1}$. We focus on the nondegenerate case ($m_\\b=1$). The thermometer Gibbs state can now be defined for any $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$ as in \\eqref{thermoB},\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{f15}\n\\tau_{\\beta,K}= \\frac{e^{-\\beta H_{\\b,K}}}{Z_{\\b,K}},\\qquad \\text{with}\\qquad Z_{\\b,K} = \\frac{1-e^{-\\frac{\\beta}{N}(K+1)}}{1-e^{-\\frac{\\beta}{N}}}.\n\\end{equation}\n(For $\\beta=0$ the formula for $Z_{\\b,K}$ reduces to $Z_{\\b,K}=K+1$.) The energy flow of $\\a$ is defined as in \\eqref{EvarA} with $\\tau_\\beta$ replaced by $\\tau_{\\beta,K}$,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{EvarAK}\nQ_{\\a,K} = \\tr{\\big(U(\\rho\\otimes\\tau_{\\beta,K}) U^* H_\\a\\big)} - \\tr{(\\rho H_\\a)},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $U$ satisfies \\eqref{m1} with $H_{\\a\\b}=H_\\a+H_{\\b,K}$, and thus depends on $K$. We define the flow in the limit of infinitely many levels of the thermometer,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta) =\\lim_{K\\rightarrow\\infty}Q_{\\a,K}(\\beta).\n\\end{equation}\nThen we have the following result \n\\begin{thm}\n\\label{thmQbar}\n\\ \n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item[\\rm \\bf (1)] Suppose $\\rho$ is neither the ground nor the most excited state of $H_\\a$. Then there exists a unique $\\bop\\in\\mathbb R$ such that $\\bar Q_\\a(\\bop)=0$. Moreover, $\\bop$ has the same sign as $\\bar Q_\\a(0)$ and $\\bop=0$ if and only if $\\bar Q_\\a(0)=0$. \n\nFor $\\bar Q_\\a(0)\\neq 0$, $\\bop$ is a real analytic function of the probability vector $\\mathbf p=\\{p_k\\}_{k=1}^d$ (the popluations of $\\rho$) on the open simplex ${\\mathcal S}=\\{ (p_1, p_2, \\dots, p_d)\\in (\\mathbb R_+\\backslash\\{0\\})^d\\ | \\sum_{j=1}^dp_j=1 \\}$.\n\n\\item[\\rm\\bf (2)] If $\\rho$ is the ground state, then $\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta)>0$ for all $\\beta\\in \\mathbb R,$ and $\\lim_{\\beta\\rightarrow\\infty}\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta)=0$. If $\\rho$ is the most excited state, then $\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta)<0$ for all $\\beta\\in \\mathbb R,$ and $\\lim_{\\beta\\rightarrow-\\infty}\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta)=0$.\n\\end{itemize}\n\\end{thm}\n\nIn accordance with statement (2) of Theorem \\ref{thmQbar} we assign $\\bop=\\infty$ to the ground state and $\\bop=-\\infty$ to the most excited state.\n\\medskip\n\nTheorem \\ref{thmQbar} is a consequence of the following result, proven in Section \\ref{sec:proofthmQbar}. \n\n\\begin{thm}\n\\label{thm:QbetainR}\nLet $0\\neq\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$. Then we have \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{f34}\n\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta) = \n\\left\\{\n\\begin{array}{ll}\nQ^+_\\a(\\beta):=\\displaystyle\\sum_{1\\leq j < k \\leq d}\\frac{e^{-\\beta (\\ve_k -\\ve_j)}p_j-p_k}{k(k-1)} \\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}(\\ve_k-\\ve_l), & \\quad \\beta>0,\\\\ [15pt]\nQ^-_\\a(\\beta) := \\displaystyle\\sum_{1\\le k< j\\le d} \\frac{e^{-\\beta(\\ve_k-\\ve_j)}p_j - p_k}{(d-k+1)(d-k)} \\sum_{l=k+1}^d(\\ve_k-\\ve_l), & \\quad \\beta<0.\n\\end{array}\n\\right.\n\\end{equation}\nBoth $Q^\\pm_\\a(\\beta)$ are defined for $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$ (are in fact analytic entire in $\\beta$) and we have \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{contflowzero'}\nQ^+_\\a(0)=Q^-_\\a(0) = \\sum_{j=1}^d \\ve_j(\\frac1d -p_j),\n\\end{equation}\nwhich also coincides with the limit of $Q_{\\a,K}(0)$ as $K\\rightarrow\\infty$.\n\\end{thm}\n\nThe $\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta)$, $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$ given in \\eqref{f34} is a natural extension of $Q_\\a(\\beta)$, $\\beta>0$ of \\eqref{qabeta}. To derive Theorem \\ref{thmQbar} we note that $\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta)$ is continuous for $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$, even at $\\beta=0$. Moreover, the explicit expressions show that both $Q^-_\\a(\\beta)$ and $Q^+_\\a(\\beta)$ are strictly decreasing in $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$ (unless $\\rho$ is the ground or the top excited state, in which case $Q_\\a^-(\\beta)$ or $Q_\\a^+(\\beta)$ are constant, respectively), and that $Q^-_\\a(\\beta)$ is concave and $Q^+_\\a(\\beta)$ is convex. Moreover,\n\\begin{align}\n\\lim_{\\beta\\rightarrow +\\infty}\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta) &= -\\sum_{1\\leq j < k \\leq d}\\frac{p_k}{k(k-1)} \\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}(\\ve_k-\\ve_l)\\le 0, \\label{18.1}\\\\\n\\lim_{\\beta\\rightarrow -\\infty} \\bar Q_\\a(\\beta) &= -\\sum_{1\\le k< j\\le d} \\frac{p_k}{(d-k+1)(d-k)} \\sum_{l=k+1}^d(\\ve_k-\\ve_l) \\ge 0.\\label{18.2}\n\\end{align}\nThe value of $\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta)$ now stays bounded as $\\beta\\rightarrow-\\infty$, as it is truly an average energy difference of the finite system $\\a$. If $\\rho$ is not the ground state, then the inequality of \\eqref{18.1} is strict (and it is an equality for the ground state). If $\\rho$ is not the most excited state, then the inequality \\eqref{18.2} is strict (and it is an equality for the most excited state). So for $\\rho$ none of these two states, $\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta)$, \\eqref{f34} has a unique root $\\bop\\in\\mathbb R$ whose sign is the same as that of $\\bar Q_\\a(0)$, \\eqref{contflowzero'}. The regularity of $\\bop\\neq 0$ for $\\bar Q_\\a(0)\\neq 0$ as a function of $\\mathbf p\\in \\mathcal{S}$ is proven as in the case of Theorem \\ref{thm2}.\n\\medskip\n\n\n{\\bf Examples.} {\\bf (1)} Consider first the qubit case $d=2$, and $\\rho$ such that $p_1p_2\\neq 0$, to avoid the extreme cases dealt with above. We compute\n$$\nQ^+_\\a(\\beta)= \\frac{\\varepsilon_2-\\varepsilon_1}{2}\\big ( e^{-\\beta (\\varepsilon_2-\\varepsilon_1)}p_1-p_2\\big),\\qquad \n Q^-_\\a(\\beta)= \\frac{\\varepsilon_1-\\varepsilon_2}{2}\\big ( e^{-\\beta (\\varepsilon_1-\\varepsilon_2)}p_2-p_1\\big)\n$$\nand $Q^\\pm_\\a(0)= \\frac{\\varepsilon_2-\\varepsilon_1}{2}(p_1-p_2)$. We point out that $\\partial_\\beta Q_\\a^-(\\beta)|_{\\beta=0}=-\\frac{(\\ve_2-\\ve_1)^2}{2}p_2$ and $\\partial_\\beta Q_\\a^+(\\beta)|_{\\beta=0}=-\\frac{(\\ve_2-\\ve_1)^2}{2}p_1$, which shows that $\\bar Q_\\a$ is not differentiable at $\\beta=0$ unless $p_1=p_2$.\nIn all cases, \n\\begin{equation}\\label{betaqbit}\n\\bop=\\frac{\\ln(p_1)-\\ln(p_2)}{\\varepsilon_2-\\varepsilon_1}.\n\\end{equation}\nNote also that for any fixed $\\beta\\in \\mathbb R$, we have $\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta)=0$ if and only if\n\\begin{equation}\\label{gibbstemp}\n p_j=\\frac{e^{-\\beta \\varepsilon_j}}{e^{-\\beta \\varepsilon_1}+e^{-\\beta \\varepsilon_1}}=\\braket{\\psi_j^\\a|\\gamma_{\\beta}\\, \\psi_j^\\a}, \\quad j=1,2.\n\\end{equation}\nIn the two-dimensional case, the condition $\\bar Q(\\beta)=0$ thus fixes the diagonal of $\\rho$ in the $H_\\a$ basis. This is due to the fact that for qubits, the trace condition and $\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta)=0$ uniquely determine the state, and that the Gibbs state $\\gamma_{\\beta}$ always satisfies both constraints. However, there is a non-uniqueness or indeterminacy of the coherence (off-diagonal density matrix element). Indeed, all qubit density matrices with the given diagonal and varying coherence $z$ satisfying $|z|^2\\le p_1(1-p_1)$ have the {\\it same} associated contact temperature $\\bop$. In higher dimensions $\\bop$ does not fix the diagonal of the state. \nFinally, we remark that the effective temperature $\\beta^*$ defined as the unique zero of\n\\begin{align}\\label{defbeta^*}\n \\beta\\mapsto \\tr (H_\\a \\rho)-\\tr(H_\\a \\gamma_\\beta),\n\\end{align}\nthe minimizer of the relative entropy $S(\\rho|\\gamma_\\beta)$, see Section \\ref{sec:intro}, coincides in the qubit case with $\\bop$ given by \\eqref{betaqbit}.\n\n\\medskip\n\n{\\bf (2)} \nWe now turn to $d=3$ to further illustrate properties of $\\bop$, showing in particular that $\\bop$ and $\\beta^*$ are in general unrelated.\nAssume $p_1, p_3\\neq 1$. In this case, $\\bop$ is determined by the vanishing of $\\bar Q_\\a$ given by \\eqref{f34}\n\\begin{align}\n\\bar Q_\\a^+(\\beta)\n={}&\n\\Bigg[\n\\frac12(\\varepsilon_2-\\varepsilon_1)e^{-\\beta(\\varepsilon_2-\\varepsilon_1)}\n+\n\\frac16\\big(2\\varepsilon_3-\\varepsilon_1-\\varepsilon_2\\big)\ne^{-\\beta(\\varepsilon_3-\\varepsilon_1)}\n\\Bigg]p_1\n\\label{qd=3}\\\\\n&+\n\\Bigg[\n-\\frac12(\\varepsilon_2-\\varepsilon_1)\n+\n\\frac16\\big(2\\varepsilon_3-\\varepsilon_1-\\varepsilon_2\\big)\ne^{-\\beta(\\varepsilon_3-\\varepsilon_2)}\n\\Bigg]p_2\n-\n\\frac13\n\\big(2\\varepsilon_3-\\varepsilon_1-\\varepsilon_2\\big)\n\\,p_3\\qquad \\text{for $\\beta>0$}\n\\nonumber\n\\end{align}\nAccording to \\eqref{defbeta^*}$, \\beta^*$ is characterized by \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{betastar3}\ne^{-\\beta \\varepsilon_1}(\\varepsilon_1-\\tr(\\rho H_\\a))+e^{-\\beta \\varepsilon_2}(\\varepsilon_2-\\tr(\\rho H_\\a))+e^{-\\beta \\varepsilon_3}(\\varepsilon_3-\\tr(\\rho H_\\a))=0.\n\\end{equation}\nConsider states satisfying \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{rest}\n \\varepsilon_2=\\tr(\\rho H_\\a)=p_1\\varepsilon_1+p_2\\varepsilon_2+p_3\\varepsilon_3.\n\\end{equation}\nFrom this and from the trace condition, we deduce that the state can be parameterized by $p_2$,\n\\begin{align}\n\\label{paramp2}\n0&\\leq p_2\\leq 1,\\ \\ \n p_1=(1-p_2)\\frac{\\varepsilon_3-\\varepsilon_2}{\\varepsilon_3-\\varepsilon_1}, \\ \\ \n p_3=(1-p_2)\\frac{\\varepsilon_2-\\varepsilon_1}{\\varepsilon_3-\\varepsilon_1}.\n\\end{align}\n\\begin{figure}[h!]\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=.8\\linewidth]{barQ_plot.png}\n\\caption{The energy flow $\\bar Q_\\a(\\beta)$, \\eqref{f34} for states parameterized by $p_2$ as per \\eqref{paramp2}, at $\\ve_1=0, \\ve_2=1/2, \\ve_3=5/2$, for various values of $0\\leq p_2\\leq 1$.}\n \\label{Fig.2}\n\\end{figure}\nWe deduce from \\eqref{betastar3}, \\eqref{rest} and \\eqref{paramp2} that\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{3levelbetas}\n\\beta^*=\\frac{1}{\\varepsilon_3-\\varepsilon_1}\\ln(\\frac{\\varepsilon_3-\\varepsilon_2}{\\varepsilon_2-\\varepsilon_1})=\\frac{\\ln(p_1)-\\ln(p_3)}{\\varepsilon_3-\\varepsilon_1}.\n\\end{equation}\nWe now consider the situation for large $\\ve_3$. As $\\bar Q_\\a(0)=(\\ve_1+\\ve_3-2\\ve_2)/3$, which is independent of $p_2$, we have $\\bar Q_\\a(0)>0$ and $\\bop>0$ for all $0\\le p_2\\le 1$. From \\eqref{paramp2}, \\eqref{3levelbetas} we have for fixed $0\\le p_2\\le 1$ and large $\\ve_3$,\n\\begin{align}\n\\label{Est1}\np_1\\sim 1-p_2, & \\quad p_3\\sim (1-p_2)\\frac{\\ve_2-\\ve_1}{\\ve_3},\\\\\n\\quad e^{-\\beta^*(\\ve_3-\\ve_1)}\\sim \\frac{\\ve_2-\\ve_1}{\\ve_3},\\quad &e^{-\\beta^*(\\ve_3-\\ve_2)}\\sim \\frac{\\ve_2-\\ve_1}{\\ve_3},\\quad e^{-\\beta^*(\\ve_2-\\ve_1)}\\sim 1.\n\\label{Est1.5}\n\\end{align}\nUsing \\eqref{Est1}, \\eqref{Est1.5} in \\eqref{qd=3} gives,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\bar Q_\\a^+(\\beta^*)\n\\sim \\frac16 (\\ve_2-\\ve_1)(1-2p_2). \n\\label{Est2}\n\\end{equation}\nThe sign of $\\bar Q_\\a^+(\\beta^*)$ depends on $p_2$: $\\bar Q_\\a^+(\\beta^*)\\ge 0 \\Leftrightarrow p_2\\le 1/2$ with equality on the left if and only if equality on the right. For $p_2<1/2$ we have $\\bar Q_\\a^+(\\beta^*)>0$ while (by definition) $\\bar Q_\\a^+(\\bop)=0$. As $\\mathbb R\\ni \\beta\\mapsto \\bar Q_\\a^+(\\beta)$ is strictly decreasing, this implies that $\\beta^*<\\bop$. For the same reason we have $\\beta^*>\\bop$ when $p_2>1/2$. This shows that the two temperatures are not related, generally.\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\\section{Energy flow, thermal channel, stochastic matrix}\n\\label{sec:eflow}\n\nFor $\\beta>0$, we define the quantum channel $\\Phi_\\beta: \\mathcal B(\\h_A)\\rightarrow\\mathcal B(\\h_A)$ by\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{defPhibeta}\n\\Phi_\\beta(X) = {\\rm Tr}_B\\big(U (X\\otimes\n\\tau_\\beta) U^*\\big),\\qquad X\\in\\mathcal B(\\h_A).\n\\end{equation}\nThe CPTP map $\\Phi_\\beta$ is a particular example of a reduced thermal quantum channel. Due to \\eqref{m1} the system Gibbs state \\eqref{AGibbs} is invariant under this channel, \n\\begin{align}\n\\label{invargibbs}\n \\Phi_\\beta(\\gamma_\\beta)=\\gamma_\\beta.\n\\end{align}\nWe derive general properties of those channels in Section \\ref{secRedQChannels}. We associate to $\\Phi_\\beta$ a $d\\times d$ matrix $G$ with matrix elements\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{defGqCh}\nG_{jj'} = \\big\\langle \\psi^\\a_j \\big| \\Phi_\\beta\\big(|\\psi^\\a_{j'}\\rangle\\langle\\psi^\\a_{j'}|\\big)\\big| \\psi^\\a_j\\big\\rangle.\n\\end{equation}\nThe matrix elements have the following interpretation. Given that the system $A$ starts in the energy eigenstate $\\psi^A_{j'}$ before interacting with the thermometer $B$, the probability of finding the system (upon a quantum measurement of the observable $H_A$) in the eigenstate $\\psi^A_j$ after the interaction is just $G_{jj'}$. Therefore we have $G_{jj'}\\ge 0$ and $\\sum_{j=1}^d G_{jj'}=1$ for all $j'$, which means that $G$ is a stochastic matrix, which we call the stochastic matrix associated to the quantum channel $\\Phi_\\beta$. The energy flow $Q_A$ is expressed via the stochastic matrix $G$ as follows. \n\n\n\n\\begin{prop}\n\\label{gjjp}\nWith the notation of Theorem \\ref{Qunbounded} we have for $\\beta>0$\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{flow}\nQ_\\a = \\vve \\cdot G \\vvp -\\vve\\cdot\\vvp, \n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\vve=(\\ve_1,\\ldots,\\ve_{d})^T$ and $\\vvp=(p_1,\\ldots,p_d)^T$ are the column vectors in $\\mathbb R^{d}$ whose entries are the energies of $H_\\a$ and populations of $\\rho$, and where $G$ is the $d\\times d$ stochastic matrix associated to $\\Phi_\\beta$, \\eqref{defGqCh}. Moreover, the matrix elements of $G$ have the following expression,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{33}\n G_{j j'} =\\sum_{s=\\max\\{j,j'\\}}^{d}\\frac{1}{s}\\big(e^{-\\beta (\\ve_s-\\ve_{j'})}-e^{-\\beta (\\ve_{s+1}-\\ve_{j'})}\\big)\\ \\ \\ \\text{with \\ }\\ e^{-\\beta \\ve_{d+1}}=0,\n\\end{equation}\nand the eigenvalues of $G$ belong to $(0,1]$, $1$ being a simple eigenvalue.\n\\end{prop}\n\n\n{\\bf Proof of Proposition \\ref{gjjp}.} \nUsing the orthonormal basis $\\psi^\\a_j\\otimes \\psi^\\b_{km}$ of $\\mathcal H_\\a\\otimes\\mathcal H_\\b$ and writing the corresponding matrix elements of $U$ as $U_{jkm,j'k'm'}$, we obtain \n\\begin{align}\n{\\rm Tr}&\\big(U(\\rho\\otimes\\tau_{\\beta}) U^* H_\\a\\big) =\n\\sum_{jkm}\\, \\ve_j\\big\\langle\\psi_j^\\a\\otimes\\psi^\\b_{km}| U(\\rho\\otimes\\tau_\\beta)U^*|\\psi_j^\\a\\otimes\\psi^\\b_{km}\\big \\rangle\\nonumber\\\\\n&=\\sum_{jkm}\\sum_{j' i'}\\sum_{k'm'} \\ve_j \\langle \\psi_{j'}^\\a|\\rho|\\psi^\\a_{i'}\\rangle \\frac{e^{-\\beta\\eta_{k'}}}{Z_\\b} U_{jkm,j'k'm'}\\overline{U_{jkm,i'k'm'}}.\n\\label{15}\n\\end{align}\nDue to \\eqref{m1} the product of the matrix elements vanishes unless $\\ve_j+\\eta_k=\\ve_{j'}+\\eta_{k'}=\\ve_{i'}+\\eta_{k'}$. The simplicity of the eigenvalues $\\ve_j$ forces $j'=i'$. The expression thus only depends on the diagonal density matrix elements $p_{j'}=\\langle\\psi_{j'}^\\a|\\rho|\\psi_{j'}^\\a\\rangle$,\n\\begin{align}\n\\label{12}\n{\\rm Tr}\\big(U(\\rho\\otimes\\tau_{\\beta}) U^* &H_\\a\\big) =\\sum_{jj'}\\sum_{kk'mm'} \\ve_j p_{j'} \\frac{e^{-\\beta\\eta_{k'}}}{Z_\\b} |U_{jkm,j'k'm'}|^2\\nonumber\\\\\n& = \\sum_\\ell \\sum_{jj'kk'mm'} \\chi\\big(\\ve_j+\\eta_k=\\ve_{j'}+\\eta_{k'}=E_\\ell\\big)\\ve_j p_{j'} \\frac{e^{-\\beta\\eta_{k'}}}{Z_\\b} |U^{(\\ell)}_{jkm,j'k'm'}|^2.\n\\end{align}\nNext we calculate the modulus square of the density matrix elements. Consider first the assumption {\\bf (G)}. For each $\\ell$, the transition probabilities between any eigenstates $\\psi^\\a_j\\otimes \\psi^\\b_{km}$ and $\\psi^\\a_{j'}\\otimes \\psi^\\b_{k'm'}$ satisfy\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{m2}\n\\big|U^{(\\ell)}_{jkm, j'k'm'}\\big|^2\\equiv \\big|\\langle \\psi^\\a_j\\otimes\\psi^\\b_{km}, U^{(\\ell)} \\psi^\\a_{j'}\\otimes \\psi^{\\b}_{k'm'}\\rangle\\big|^2 = 1/g_\\ell,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $g_\\ell=\\dim\\h_{\\a\\b}^{(\\ell)}$ is the size of the matrix. The value of the constant $1/g_\\ell$ is determined by the condition that $U^{(\\ell)}$ is unitary on $\\h_{\\a\\b}^{(\\ell)}$. Indeed, the column $jkm$ must be a vector of norm one, so $\\sum_{j'k'm'} |U^{(\\ell)}_{jkm,j'k'm'}|^2=1$. For constant $|U^{(\\ell)}_{jkm,j'k'm'}|^2=c$ the sum is $c g_\\ell$, so $c=1/g_\\ell$. \n\nConsider now the assumption {\\bf (R)}. For a random $g\\times g$ unitary matrix $M(\\omega)$ distributed according to the Haar measure, one has $\\mathbb E[|M_{kl}(\\omega)|^2]=1/g$. Therefore \n$\\mathbb E[ |U^{(\\ell)}_{jkm, j'k'm'}\\big|^2] = 1/g_\\ell$.\n\nIn either way | understanding that we take the average in the random case | we have from \\eqref{12},\n\\begin{align}\n\\label{14}\n{\\rm Tr}\\big(U(\\rho\\otimes\\tau_{\\beta}) U^* &H_\\a\\big) = \\sum_\\ell \\frac{1}{g_\\ell} \\sum_{jj'kk'} \\chi\\big(\\ve_j+\\eta_k=\\ve_{j'}+\\eta_{k'}=E_\\ell\\big)\\ve_j p_{j'} \\frac{m^2_\\b e^{-\\beta\\eta_{k'}}}{Z_\\b}= \\vec\\ve\\cdot G\\vec p,\n\\end{align}\nwhere the factor $m^2_\\b$ is due to the sums over $m,m'$ and where $G$ is the $d\\times d$ matrix with elements\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{matG}\n{G}_{jj'} = \\sum_\\ell \\frac{1}{g_\\ell} \\sum_{kk'} \\chi\\big(\\ve_j+\\eta_k=\\ve_{j'}+\\eta_{k'}=E_\\ell\\big) \\frac{m_\\b^2e^{-\\beta \\eta_{k'}}}{Z_{\\b}}.\n\\end{equation}\nHere, $\\chi$ is the characteristic function taking the value $1$ if the condition in the argument is satisfied and $0$ else. This shows \\eqref{flow} for $G$ as given in \\eqref{matG}. \n\nIf in the above argument instead of taking the trace over $\\h_\\a$ (which is contained in the full trace $\\rm Tr$) in \\eqref{14} we consider $\\langle \\psi^\\a_j| {\\rm Tr}_\\b\\big(U(\\rho\\otimes\\tau_{\\beta}) U^* \\big)|\\psi^\\a_j\\rangle$, and we take $\\rho=|\\psi^\\a_{j'}\\rangle\\langle\\psi^\\a_{j'}|$, then we obtain precisely that $\\langle\\psi^\\a_j|\\Phi_\\beta(|\\psi^\\a_{j'}\\rangle\\langle \\psi^\\a_{j'})|\\psi^\\a_j\\rangle\n$ is given by \\eqref{matG}, so \\eqref{defGqCh} holds with $G_{jj'}$ given by \\eqref{matG}. \n\n\n\nOur next task is to see that the expressions \\eqref{33} and \\eqref{matG} are the same. We first observe that $G_{jj'}$ in \\eqref{matG} is independent of the degeneracy $m_\\b$: Both $g_\\ell$ and $Z_\\b$ are proportional to $m_\\b$ and so they compensate the $m^2_\\b$ in the numerator of \\eqref{matG}. We conclude that we can set $m_\\b=1$ in the following analysis of $G_{jj'}$. \nIntroducing the integers $\\ell_j$ defined by\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{ellj}\n\\ve_s=\\ve_1+\\frac{\\ell_s}{N},\n\\end{equation}\nwith $\\ell_1=0$ and the convention that $\\ell_{d+1}=\\infty$, we write the sum over $\\ell$ in \\eqref{matG} as $\\sum_\\ell=\\sum_{s=1}^d\\sum_{\\ell_s\\leq \\ell< \\ell_{s+1}}$. Since in this sum (for $j,j'$ fixed) we have the constraint $E_\\ell\\ge \\max\\{\\ve_j,\\ve_{j'}\\}$, we only need to sum over $s\\ge \\max\\{j,j'\\}$. Also, for $\\ell_s\\leq \\ell < \\ell_{s+1}$, we have $g_\\ell=s$, and $k, k'$ are uniquely determined by $E_\\ell=\\ve_j+\\eta_k=\\ve_{j'}+\\eta_{k'}$, so we obtain from \\eqref{matG},\n\\begin{align}\n\\label{21.1}\n G_{j j'}=\\sum_{s=\\max\\{j,j'\\}}^{d}\\sum_{\\ell_s\\leq \\ell < \\ell_{s+1}}\\frac{1}{s}\\frac{e^{-\\beta (E_\\ell-\\ve_{j'})}}{Z_{\\b}}.\n\\end{align}\nNow $E_\\ell = \\ve_1+\\ell/N$ and (with the convention $\\ve_{d+1}=\\infty$)\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{96}\n\\sum_{\\ell_s\\leq \\ell < \\ell_{s+1}} e^{-\\beta E_\\ell} = e^{-\\beta \\ve_1} \\sum_{\\ell_s\\leq \\ell < \\ell_{s+1}} e^{-\\beta\\ell/N} = e^{-\\beta \\ve_1} \\frac{e^{-\\beta\\ell_s/N}-e^{-\\beta \\ell_{s+1}/N}}{1-e^{-\\beta/N}} = \\frac{e^{-\\beta\\ve_s} - e^{-\\beta\\ve_{s+1}}}{1-e^{-\\beta/N}}.\n\\end{equation}\nUsing that $Z_B = (1-e^{-\\beta/N})^{-1}$ and the expression \\eqref{96}, we see that \\eqref{21.1} equals \\eqref{33}. This shows \\eqref{33}. To complete the proof of Proposition \\ref{gjjp} we show that all eigenvalues of $G$ are in $(0,1]$. \n\n\nThe expression \\eqref{33} shows that the stochastic matrix $G$ satisfies\n$G_{jj'} >0$, $\\forall j,j'$. The Perron-Frobenius theorem implies that $G$ admits a unique invariant vector and this vector has strictly positive entries (up to normalization) and moreover, all other eigenvalues (besides the simple eigenvalue $1$) have modulus strictly smaller than $1$. The equation \\eqref{invargibbs} shows the invariant vector is $v_\\beta\\propto (e^{-\\beta\\ve_1},\\ldots,e^{-\\beta\\ve_d})$ (see also Lemma \\ref{c-lem}). Next we show that all eigenvalues of $G$ are strictly positive. \nWe check on \\eqref{33} that $G^*D^{-1}= D^{-1}G$ holds, where $D=\\text{diag}(e^{-\\beta\\ve_1},\\ldots,e^{-\\beta \\ve_d})$. This is known as the detailed balance relation \\cite{N} (see also Lemma \\ref{lem3}(b) below). It follows that $\\langle \\varphi |D^{-1}G\\psi\\rangle=\\langle G\\varphi |D^{-1}\\psi\\rangle$ for all $\\phi,\\psi\\in\\h_A$, that is, $G$ is selfadjoint on $\\h_\\a$ with inner product $\\langle \\varphi|\\psi\\rangle_D:=\\langle \\varphi|D^{-1}\\psi\\rangle$. To show that $G$ has positive spectrum it thus suffices to show that $\\langle\\varphi, D^{-1}G\\varphi\\rangle>0$, $\\forall\\varphi\\in\\h_\\a$. Now \\eqref{33} gives \n\\begin{align}\\label{yyy}\nG = \\Gamma D^{-1},\\qquad \\text{where}\\qquad \\Gamma_{jj'} = \\sum_{s=\\max\\{j,j'\\}}^{d}\\frac{1}{s}\\big(e^{-\\beta \\ve_s}-e^{-\\beta \\ve_{s+1}}\\big)\\ \\ \\ \\text{with \\ }\\ e^{-\\beta \\ve_{d+1}}=0.\n\\end{align}\nThus we have $D^{-1}G=D^{-1}\\Gamma D^{-1}$ and hence the strict positive definiteness of $D^{-1}G$ and $\\Gamma$ are equivalent. For $j=1,\\ldots,d$, set (with $e^{-\\beta \\ve_{d+1}}=0$),\n\\begin{align}\n\\label{petitgj}\ng_j=\\sum_{s=j}^{d}\\frac{1}{s}\\big(e^{-\\beta \\ve_s}-e^{-\\beta \\ve_{s+1}}\\big).\n\\end{align}\nThen we have $g_1>g_2>\\dots >g_d>0$ and\n\\begin{align}\n\\Gamma=\\begin{pmatrix}\ng_1 & g_2& g_3 & \\dots & g_d \\\\\ng_2 & g_2 & g_3 & \\cdots & g_d\\\\\ng_3 & g_3 & g_3 & \\cdots & g_d \\\\\n\\vdots & \\vdots & \\vdots & \\ddots & \\vdots\\\\\ng_d & g_d & g_d & \\dots & g_d\n\\end{pmatrix} = TPT^*, \\qquad T=\\begin{pmatrix}\n1 & 1& 1 & \\dots & 1 \\\\\n0 & 1 & 1 & \\cdots & 1\\\\\n0 & 0 & 1 & \\cdots & 1 \\\\\n\\vdots & \\vdots & \\vdots & \\ddots & \\vdots\\\\\n0 & 0 & 0 & \\dots & 1\n\\end{pmatrix},\n\\end{align}\nand where $P=\\text{diag}(g_1-g_2, g_2-g_3, \\dots, g_{d-1}-g_d, g_d)$ is a strictly positive definite matrix. $T$ is invertible so $\\Gamma$ is a strictly positive definite matrix. This shows that the eigenvalues of $G$ are strictly positive, thus the spectrum of $G$ is contained in $(0,1]$. The proof of Proposition \\ref{gjjp} is complete.\\hfill\\qed\n\n\\bigskip\n\n\nThe stochastic matrix $G$ associated to the quantum channel $\\Phi_\\beta$ depends on the temperature $\\beta$, so we write $G=G(\\beta)$. We note the following properties: \n\\medskip\n\n(i) The matrix $G(\\beta)$ is independent of the inverse gap size $N$ and of the multiplicity $m_\\b\\geq 1$ of the spectrum of $H_\\b$ (so we may take $m_\\b=1$), and is invariant under translations of $H_\\a$ by $\\alpha \\bbbone$.\n\n(ii) The matrix valued function $G(\\beta)$ defined by \\eqref{33}, admits an analytic extension to $\\beta \\in\\mathbb C$, which we denote by the same symbol. \n\n(iii) In particular, $G(0)=\\frac{1}{d}{\\bf 1}{\\bf 1}^T$, where $\\bf 1$ is the vector with all components equal to one. The spectrum of $G(0)$ is thus $\\{0,1\\}$, where the multiplicity of $0$ equals $d-1$. Then we have $G\\vec{p}=\\frac{1}{d}{\\bf 1}$ for any probability vector $\\vec p$. Hence $G(0)\\vec p$ corresponds to the infinite temperature Gibbs state $\\bbbone/d$, for all $\\vec p$. Moreover, for $\\beta\\rightarrow\\infty$ we get\n\\begin{align}\\label{ginfini}\nG(\\infty)=\\begin{pmatrix}\n1 & 1/2 & 1/3 & \\dots & 1/d\\\\\n 0 & 1/2 & 1/3 & \\dots & 1/d\\\\\n 0 & 0 & 1/3 & \\dots & 1/d\\\\\n \\vdots & \\vdots & \\ddots &\\ddots & \\vdots \\\\\n 0 & 0 &\\dots & 0 & 1/d\n\\end{pmatrix},\n\\end{align}\nwith spectrum $\\{1, 1/2, \\dots, 1/d\\}$, and invariant probability vector $\\vec p =(1, 0, \\dots, 0)^T$ corresponding to the ground state of $H_\\a$.\n\n\n(iv) When $\\beta<0$ with $|\\beta|$ large enough, we get that $G_{j j'}(-|\\beta|)<0$, for $\\max\\{j, j'\\}<d$. This shows that if $\\Phi_{-|\\beta|}$ has a well defined extension to $\\beta< 0$, this extension will not be a positive map (recall \\eqref{defGqCh}). In the same vein, for any $\\beta<0$ we have $G_{j\\, d-1}(-|\\beta|)<0$ for $\\ve_d-\\ve_{d-1}$ large enough, which implies that $\\Phi_{-|\\beta|}$, if well defined, is not positive.\n\n\n\n\n\\section{Reduced thermal quantum channels}\n\\label{secRedQChannels}\n\n\nConsider a general bipartite system with Hilbert space $\\h_{\\rm tot}=\\h\\otimes\\h_\\rr$ where $\\dim\\h=d<\\infty$ and $\\dim\\h_\\rr\\le \\infty$. Let $H$ and $H_\\rr$ be self-adjoint, bounded below Hamiltonians on $\\h$ and $\\h_\\rr$, given by\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{hamilts}\nH=\\sum_j \\ve_j|\\psi_j\\rangle\\langle\\psi_j|,\\qquad H_\\rr=\\sum_k \\eta_k |\\chi_k\\rangle \\langle \\chi_k|,\n\\end{equation}\nwith finitely degenerate eigenvalues, and where the eigenvectors are orthonormal bases of the respective spaces. The equilibrium states at inverse temperature $\\beta\\in \\mathbb R$ are \n$$\n\\gamma_\\beta = \\frac{e^{-\\beta H}}{Z_\\beta},\\qquad \\tau_\\beta = \\frac{e^{-\\beta H_\\rr}}{Z_{\\beta, \\rr}}.\n$$\nIn the infinite dimensional case we assume that $e^{-\\beta H_\\rr}$ has a finite trace, which necessitates $\\beta>0$ since $H_\\rr$ is bounded below. Set \n$$\nH_{\\rm tot}=H+H_\\rr\n$$ \nwhere we omit trivial tensor factors in the notation (and don't fret about the simple domain considerations). Let $V$ be a unitary on $\\h_{\\rm tot}$ satisfying\n\\begin{align}\\label{comV}\n [H_{\\rm tot},V]=0.\n\\end{align}\nWe define the reduced thermal quantum channel $\\Phi: \\mathcal B(\\h)\\rightarrow\\mathcal B(\\h)$ by\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{defphibeta'}\n \\Phi (X)=\\tr_\\rr\\big(V(X\\otimes \\tau_\\beta)V^*\\big),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\tr_\\rr$ is the partial trace over $\\h_\\rr$. The map $\\Phi$ is CPTP (completely positive, trace preserving) \\cite{H, EH-K, Kr, S, NMlectnotes} and has $\\gamma_\\beta$ as an invariant vector. Complete positivity implies directly that for all $X\\in\\mathcal B(\\h)$,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{14.1}\n\\Phi(X^*) = \\big[\\Phi(X)\\big]^*.\n\\end{equation}\nThe spectrum of the map $\\Phi$ is thus invariant under complex conjugation: the eigenvalues of $\\Phi$ are either real or they appear in complex conjugate pairs. \nMoreover, again by virtue of $\\Phi$ being CPTP, its spectrum $\\sigma(\\Phi)$ satisfies\n\\begin{align}\n \\sigma(\\Phi)\\subset \\{z\\in \\mathbb C \\ | \\ |z|\\leq 1\\} \\quad \\text{and} \\quad 1\\in \\sigma(\\Phi).\n\\end{align}\n\n\\medskip\n\nDenote the sets of operators on $\\h$ which are diagonal and off diagonal relative to the eigenbasis $\\{\\psi_j\\}_{j=1}^d$ of $H$, by\n\\begin{align}\n\\mathcal D &=\\big\\{X\\in \\mathcal B(\\h) \\ \\text{s.t. $\\langle \\psi_j|X\\psi_k \\rangle =0$ for $j\\neq k$}\\big\\},\\nonumber\\\\\n\\mathcal O &=\\big\\{X\\in \\mathcal B({\\cal H}) \\ \\text{s.t. $\\langle\\psi_j|X\\psi_j\\rangle =0$ for all $j$}\\big\\}.\n\\end{align}\nThese two sets are orthogonal complements of each other when considering $\\mathcal B(\\h)$ as a Hilbert space with inner product $\\langle X|Y\\rangle_{\\mathcal B}=\\tr(X^*Y)$, and we have the orthogonal decomposition\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{bhdec}\n\\mathcal B(\\h) = \\mathcal D\\oplus \\mathcal O.\n\\end{equation}\n\n\n\n\n\\begin{lem}\n\\label{phiprop}\nSuppose that all eigenvalues $\\ve_j$ of $H$ are simple. Then\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item[\\bf (a)] $\\Phi$ leaves both $\\mathcal D$ and $\\mathcal O$ invariant, that is, $\\Phi$ is reduced by (block-diagonal in) the decomposition \\eqref{bhdec}.\n\n\n\\item[\\bf (b)] If all nonzero Bohr energies $\\ve_j-\\ve_k$ of $H$ are distinct, then $|\\psi_j\\rangle\\langle\\psi_k|$ is an eigenvector of $\\Phi$ whenever $j\\neq k$, with eigenvalue $z_{j,k}$ such that $|z_{j,k}|\\le 1$. Moreover, $z_{j,k}=\\overline{z_{k,j}}$.\n\\end{itemize}\n\\end{lem}\n\n\n\n\n\\noindent\n{\\bf Proof of Lemma \\ref{phiprop}.} \nWe start the proof by noticing that the map $\\,{\\cal U}_t:\\rm {\\cal B}({\\cal H})\\rightarrow {\\cal B}({\\cal H})$ given by $\\,{\\cal U}_t(X)=e^{-itH}Xe^{itH}$ satisfies $\\Phi \\circ {\\cal U}_t={\\cal U}_t\\circ \\Phi$ for all $t\\in \\mathbb R$. We provide the argument for the convenience of the reader (see also the review article \\cite{Lo}). For any $X\\in {\\cal B}({\\cal H})$ we have\n\\begin{align}\n\\Phi ({\\cal U}_t(X))&=\\tr_\\rr(V(e^{-itH}Xe^{itH}\\otimes \\tau_\\beta)V^*)\\nonumber\\\\\n&=\\tr_\\rr(V (e^{-itH}Xe^{itH}\\otimes e^{-itH_\\rr}\\tau_\\beta e^{itH_\\rr} )V^*)\\nonumber\\\\\n&=\\tr_\\rr(V e^{-itH_{\\rm tot}}(X\\otimes \\tau_\\beta) e^{itH_{\\rm tot}} V^*)\\nonumber\\\\\n&=\\tr_\\rr(e^{-itH_{\\rm tot}}V (X\\otimes \\tau_\\beta)V^* e^{itH_{\\rm tot}})\\nonumber\\\\\n&=e^{-itH} \\tr_\\rr(e^{-itH_\\rr} V (X\\otimes \\tau_\\beta)V^*e^{itH_\\rr}) e^{itH}\\nonumber\\\\\n&=e^{-itH} \\tr_\\rr( V (X\\otimes \\tau_\\beta)V^*) e^{itH}\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&={\\cal U}_t(\\Phi (X)).\n\\label{16}\n\\end{align}\n$\\mathcal U_t$ is a unitary group on $\\mathcal B$ and its selfadjoint generator $\\mathcal L$ is the commutator $\\mathcal L = [H,\\cdot\\,]$, that is, $\\mathcal U_t=e^{-it\\mathcal L}$. The eigenvalues of $\\mathcal L$ are the Bohr energies $\\Delta=\\ve_i-\\ve_j$. They have multiplicity $m(\\Delta)=|\\{(i,j)\\ :\\ \\ve_i-\\ve_j=\\Delta\\}|$. For every $(i,j)$ the element $X_{ij}:=|\\psi_i\\rangle\\langle\\psi_j|\\in\\mathcal B(\\h_\\a)$ is a normalized eigenvector of $\\mathcal L$ with eigenvalue $\\ve_i-\\ve_j$. The set $\\{X_{ij}\\ : \\ \\ve_i-\\ve_j=\\Delta\\}$ is an orthonormal basis for the eigenspace of $\\mathcal L$ associated to the eigenvalue $\\Delta$. Therefore the eigenprojection of $\\mathcal L$ associated to $\\Delta$ is given by\n$$\n\\Pi_\\Delta = \\sum_{i,j\\, :\\, \\ve_i-\\ve_j=\\Delta} |X_{ij}\\rangle_{\\mathcal B}\\langle X_{ij}|,\n$$\nwhere for $X,Y\\in\\mathcal B(\\h)$ we define $|X\\rangle_{\\mathcal B}\\langle Y| : \\mathcal B(\\h)\\rightarrow\\mathcal B(\\h)$ by the action $|X\\rangle_{\\mathcal B}\\langle Y| (Z)=X\\,\\tr(Y^*Z)$.\nThe spectral decomposition of $\\mathcal L$ is then,\n$$\n\\mathcal L = \\sum_\\Delta \\Delta \\, \\Pi_\\Delta, \n$$\nwhere the sum runs over all (distinct) Bohr energies. By \\eqref{16}, $\\Phi$ and $\\mathcal L$ commute, which is equivalent to saying that $\\Phi$ and $\\Pi_\\Delta$ commute for all $\\Delta$. In other words, $\\Phi$ leaves each eigenspace of $\\mathcal L$ invariant. \n\n\nSo far we did not use that the $\\ve_j$ are all distinct. Now if they are, then the eigenspace associated to $\\Delta=0$ is spanned by $\\{X_{ii}\\}_{i=1}^d$, which is precisely $\\mathcal D$. This shows that $\\Phi$ leaves $\\mathcal D$ invariant. Next set $Q_0=\\sum_{\\Delta \\neq 0}\\Pi_\\Delta$, so that $Q_0=\\bbbone-\\Pi_0=(\\Pi_0)^\\perp$ is the projection onto the orthogonal complement of $\\mathcal D$, which is exactly $\\mathcal O$. As $\\Phi$ commutes with each $\\Pi_\\Delta$ it commutes with $Q_0$. Thus $\\Phi$ leaves $\\mathcal O$ invariant. This shows (a).\n\nNow suppose that the nonzero eigenvalues $\\Delta$ of $\\mathcal L$ are all nondegenerate, then the associated spectral subspaces have dimension one and are spanned by a single $X_{ij}=|\\psi_i\\rangle\\langle\\psi_j|$. Hence $\\Phi$ maps each $|\\psi_i\\rangle\\langle\\psi_j|$ into a multiple of itself ($i\\neq j$).\n\nLet $z_{i,j}$ be the eigenvalue associated to $|\\psi_i\\rangle\\langle\\psi_j|$, that is, $\\Phi(|\\psi_i\\rangle\\langle\\psi_j|) = z_{i,j}|\\psi_i\\rangle\\langle\\psi_j|$. Then $|z_{i,j}|\\leq 1$ and $z_{i,j}=\\overline{z_{j,i}}$ follows from \\eqref{14.1}.\nThis completes the proof of the Lemma \\ref{phiprop}. \\hfill\\qed\n\n\\medskip\n\nThe restriction of the channel $\\Phi$ to diagonal operators has the following physical meaning. If the system starts out in the eigenstate $\\psi_{j'}$ before interacting with $\\rr$, then the probability of finding the system (upon a quantum measurement of the observable $H$) in the eigenstate $\\psi_j$ after the interaction with $\\rr$ is \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{Gabs}\nG_{jj'}=\\big[\\tr_\\rr(V(\\ket{\\psi_{j'}}\\bra{\\psi_{j'}}\\otimes \\tau_{\\beta})V^*)\\big]_{jj} = \\big[\\Phi(\\ket{\\psi_{j'}}\\bra{\\psi_{j'}})\\big]_{jj},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere we use the notation $[\\cdots]_{kl}=\\langle\\psi_k|\\cdots|\\psi_l\\rangle$. The relation \\eqref{Gabs} defines a $d\\times d$ matrix $G$ whose $(j,j')$ entries are probabilities for the transition $\\psi_{j'}\\rightarrow \\psi_j$ induced by the contact with $\\rr$. The matrix represents the action of $\\Phi$ on $\\mathcal D$ which is identified as $\\mathcal D \\simeq \\{ v\\in \\mathbb C^d\\}$. For any given $j'$ the probabilities for the transitions $j'\\rightarrow j$ add up to one when we sum over $j$, so\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{stoch1}\n\\sum_{j=1}^{d}G_{jj'}=1,\\quad \\forall j'.\n\\end{equation}\n$G$ is the transition matrix of a Markov chain, or a stochastic matrix | characterized by having nonnegative entries such that the sum of each column adds up to $1$, see also \\cite{Lo}. The constant vector $v_0=(1,1,\\ldots,1)^T\\in{\\mathbb C}^d$ represents the equilibrium state $\\gamma_\\beta$ at $\\beta=0$. As $(G^*)_{j'j}=G_{jj'}$, \\eqref{stoch1} means that \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{ev0}\nG^*v_0=v_0.\n\\end{equation}\nBy linearity of \\eqref{Gabs} in the system density matrix and the fact that $V$ commutes with $H+H_\\rr$ we obtain\n\\begin{align}\n\\sum_{j'=1}^{d}G_{jj'}\\frac{e^{-\\beta \\ve_{j'}}}{Z_\\beta} & =\\big[ \\tr_\\rr(V(\\gamma_{\\beta}\\otimes \\tau_{\\beta})V^*)\\big]_{jj}=\\frac{1}{Z_\\beta Z_{\\rr,\\beta}}\\big[\\tr_\\rr(V e^{-\\beta (H+H_\\rr)} V^*)\\big]_{jj}\\nonumber\\\\\n&= \\frac{1}{Z_\\beta Z_{\\rr,\\beta}}\\big[\\tr_\\rr(e^{-\\beta (H+H_\\rr)})\\big]_{jj}=\\frac{e^{-\\beta \\ve_{j}}}{Z_\\beta},\n\\end{align}\nwhich means that $G$ leaves the system Gibbs state $\\rho_\\beta$ invariant, in the sense that \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{ev1}\nGv_\\beta=v_\\beta\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $v_\\beta$ is the vector with $j$th entry equal to $Z_\\beta^{-1}e^{-\\beta \\ve_j}$. (This property is well known \\cite{Lo}.) \n\nLet us consider the adjoint $\\Phi^*$ of $\\Phi$, where $\\Phi$ is considered as a linear operator on $\\mathcal B(\\h)$ with inner product $\\langle X,Y\\rangle_{\\mathcal B} = {\\rm Tr}(X^*Y)$. From definition \\eqref{Gabs}, \n\\begin{align}\\label{Gadj}\n (G^*)_{kl} &= \\overline{G_{lk}}= \\overline{\\big\\langle \\ket{\\psi_{l}}\\bra{\\psi_{l}} , \\Phi(\\ket{\\psi_{k}}\\bra{\\psi_{k}})\\big \\rangle_{\\mathcal B}}= \\big\\langle \\ket{\\psi_{k}}\\bra{\\psi_{k}} , \\Phi^*(\\ket{\\psi_{l}}\\bra{\\psi_{l}})\\big \\rangle_{\\mathcal B}\\nonumber\\\\\n &=\\big[\\Phi^*(\\ket{\\psi_{l}}\\bra{\\psi_{l}})\\big]_{kk}.\n\\end{align}\nReplacing $V$ by $V^*$ in the definition of $\\Phi$, \\eqref{defphibeta'}, gives a second CPTP map on $\\Psi$ on $\\mathcal B(\\h)$, defined by \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{defphibeta''}\n \\Psi (X)=\\tr_\\rr\\big(V^*(X\\otimes \\tau_\\beta)V\\big),\n\\end{equation}\nfor which all the above considerations hold ($\\Psi$ leaves $\\gamma_\\beta$ invariant, Lemma \\ref{phiprop} holds for $\\Psi$, etc.). \nWe have for any $X,Y\\in\\mathcal B(\\h)$,\n\\begin{align*}\n\\langle X,\\Phi(Y)\\rangle_{\\mathcal B} &= \\tr_{\\h_{\\rm tot}} \\big[ (X^*\\otimes \\bbbone_\\rr) V(Y\\otimes\\tau_\\beta)V^*\\big]\\nonumber\\\\\n&=\\tr_{\\h_{\\rm tot}} \\big[V^*(X^*\\otimes \\bbbone_\\rr) V (e^{-\\beta H}\\otimes\\tau_\\beta) (e^{\\beta H}Y\\otimes\\bbbone_\\rr)\\big]\\nonumber\\\\\n&=\\tr_{\\h_{\\rm tot}} \\big[V^*((e^{-\\beta H}X)^*\\otimes \\tau_\\beta) V (e^{\\beta H}Y\\otimes\\bbbone_\\rr)\\big]\\nonumber\\\\\n&=\\tr_{\\h} \\big( [\\Psi(e^{-\\beta H}X)]^* e^{\\beta H}Y\\big)\\nonumber\\\\\n&=\\langle e^{\\beta H}\\Psi(e^{-\\beta H}X), Y\\rangle_{\\mathcal B}.\n\\end{align*}\nWe conclude that \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{phistarpsi}\n\\Phi^*(X) = e^{\\beta H}\\Psi\\big(e^{-\\beta H}X\\big),\\qquad \\forall X\\in\\mathcal B(\\h).\n\\end{equation}\nIt is then clear that $\\Phi^*$ and $\\Psi$ have the same spectrum. \nJust as with $\\Phi$ and $G$, associated to the channel $\\Psi$ is the stochastic matrix F with matrix elements ({\\it c.f.}~\\eqref{Gabs}) \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{Gabs''}\nF_{jj'}=\\big[\\tr_\\rr(V^*(\\ket{\\psi_{j'}}\\bra{\\psi_{j'}}\\otimes \\tau_{\\beta})V)\\big]_{jj} = \\big[\\Psi(\\ket{\\psi_{j'}}\\bra{\\psi_{j'}})\\big]_{jj}.\n\\end{equation}\nThen, relations \\eqref{phistarpsi} with $X=\\ket{\\psi_{l}}\\bra{\\psi_{l}}$ and \\eqref{Gadj} yield $e^{-\\beta \\ve_k} (G^*)_{kl} = F_{kl}e^{-\\beta \\ve_l}$, or in matrix form,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{23}\nG^*= D^{-1}F D, \\qquad \\text{where} \\qquad D=\\text{diag}(e^{-\\beta\\ve_1},\\ldots,e^{-\\beta \\ve_d}).\n\\end{equation}\n\n\n\n\nBy Lemma \\ref{phiprop}, $\\Phi$ leaves both $\\mathcal D$ and $\\mathcal O$ invariant. We denote the restrictions by $\\Phi|_{\\mathcal D}$ and $\\Phi|_{\\mathcal O}$. The eigenvector $v_\\beta\\propto (e^{-\\beta\\ve_1},\\ldots,e^{-\\beta\\ve_d})$ of $G$ with eigenvalue $1$ (c.f. \\eqref{ev1}) has strictly positive entries. Thus, if $G_{jj'}>0$ for all $j,j'$, then it follows from the Perron-Frobenius theorem that $v_\\beta$ is the Perron-Frobenius eigenvector (the unique eigenvector with all strictly positive entries) and $1$ is the Perron-Frobenius eigenvalue, having the property that it is a simple eigenvalue and all other eigenvalues have modulus smaller than $1$. The same applies to $\\Psi$ and $F$. This shows the assertion (a) of the following result. \n\n\n\\begin{lem}\n\\label{c-lem}\nSuppose that all eigenvalues $\\ve_j$ of $H$ are simple and that $G_{jj'}>0$ for all $j,j'$ (respectively $F_{jj'}>0$ for all $j,j'$). Then\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item[{\\rm \\bf (a)}]\n$1$ is a simple eigenvalue of $\\Phi|_{\\mathcal D}$ (respectively $\\Psi|_{\\mathcal D}$) with associated eigenvector $v_\\beta$ (representing $\\rho_\\beta$ as a vector in $\\mathbb C^d$). All other eigenvalues have modulus less than $1$. \n\n\\item[{\\rm \\bf (b)}] If in addition all nonzero Bohr energies $\\ve_j-\\ve_k$ of $H$ are distinct, then the spectrum of $\\Phi|_{\\mathcal O}$ (respectively that of $\\Psi|_{\\mathcal O}$) lies in the open complex unit disk.\n\\end{itemize}\n\\end{lem}\n\n\nThe property (b) of Lemma \\ref{c-lem} means that the energy coherences (off-diagonal density matrix elements) of a density matrix $\\rho$ cannot increase when $\\Phi$ is applied. Since $\\Phi=\\Phi|_{\\mathcal D}\\oplus\\Phi|_{\\mathcal O}$, Lemma \\ref{c-lem} immediately implies the following result.\n\n\\begin{cor}\n\\label{cor1}\nSuppose that all eigenvalues $\\ve_j$ of $H$ are simple. If $G_{jj'}>0$ for all $j,j'$ (respectively $F_{jj'}>0$ for all $j,j'$) and the Bohr energies $\\ve_j-\\ve_k$ of $H$ are all distinct, then $\\Phi$ (respectively $\\Psi$) has a simple eigenvalue $1$ with eigenvector $\\rho_\\beta$ and all other eigenvalues have modulus less than $1$. \n\\end{cor}\n\n{\\bf Proof of Lemma \\ref{c-lem}.} (a) was proven before the lemma. To prove (b) we note that by Lemma \\ref{phiprop}(b) the eigenvalues of $\\Phi|_{\\mathcal O}$ are $z_{k,l}=\\big\\langle \\psi_k, \\Phi(|\\psi_k\\rangle\\langle\\psi_l|)\\psi_l\\big\\rangle\n$, for $k\\neq l$, and they are simple. By the definition \\eqref{defphibeta'} of $\\Phi$ and using the basis $|\\chi_k\\rangle$ of $\\h_\\rr$ (see \\eqref{hamilts}), we obtain\n\\begin{equation*}\nz_{k,l} = \\sum_{r,s} \\frac{e^{-\\beta\\eta_r}}{Z_{\\beta,\\rr}} V_{ks,kr} \\overline{V_{ls,lr}},\n\\end{equation*}\nwhere $V_{ks,k's'} = \\langle \\psi_k\\otimes\\chi_s|V\\,\\psi_{k'}\\otimes\\chi_{s'}\\rangle$. It follows from the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality that \n\\begin{equation}\n|z_{k,l}|^2 \\le \\Big( \\sum_{r,s} \\frac{e^{-\\beta\\eta_r}}{Z_{\\beta,\\rr}} |V_{ks,kr}|^2 \\Big) \\Big( \\sum_{r,s} \\frac{e^{-\\beta\\eta_r}}{Z_{\\beta,\\rr}} |V_{ls,lr}|^2\\Big). \n\\label{30}\n\\end{equation}\nAgain by \\eqref{defphibeta'} and using the $|\\chi_k\\rangle$ to express the trace over $\\h_\\rr$ we obtain for the diagonal matrix elements of $G$, \\eqref{Gabs},\n\\begin{equation}\nG_{jj} = \\sum_{r,s}\\frac{e^{-\\beta \\eta_r}}{Z_{\\beta,\\rr}} |V_{js,jr}|^2,\n\\end{equation}\nso that \\eqref{30} becomes $|z_{k,l}|^2\\le G_{kk}G_{ll}$. Now if $|z_{k,l}|=1$ then $G_{kk}=G_{ll}=1$, which means that the $k$th and the $l$th column of the stochastic matrix $G$ are just the $k$th and $l$th canonical basis vector. Hence those vectors are both eigenvectors of $G$ with eigenvalue 1. This contradicts the simplicity of the eigenvalue $1$ of $G$. It follows that $|z_{k,l}|<1$ and the proof of Lemma \\ref{c-lem} is complete.\\hfill\\qed\n\\smallskip\n\n\n{\\bf Remark.} Lemma \\ref{c-lem} holds under the weaker assumption that the stochastic matrix $G$ is irreducible and aperiodic. {For the applications that follow, the property $G_{jj'}>0$ for all $j,j'$ holds naturally, hence our simpler formulation. }\n\n\n\n\n\\medskip\n\nRecall the definitions of the channels $\\Phi$ and $\\Psi$ in \\eqref{14.1} and \\eqref{defphibeta''}. We say that the channel $\\Phi$, \\eqref{14.1} is {\\it homogeneous} if $\\Phi|_{\\cal D}=\\Psi|_{\\cal D}$, that is, \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{homog}\n\\tr_\\rr\\big(V(X\\otimes \\tau_\\beta)V^*\\big) = \\tr_\\rr\\big(V^*(X\\otimes \\tau_\\beta)V\\big),\\qquad \\forall X\\in\\cal D\\subset \\mathcal B(\\h). \n\\end{equation}\nThis relation is equivalent to $G=F$, the equality of the stochastic matrices \\eqref{Gabs}, \\eqref{Gabs''} representing the channels reduced to $\\mathcal D$. \n\n\\begin{lem}\n\\label{lem3}\n\\ \\ \n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item[\\rm (a)] Suppose that $\\Phi$ is a homogeneous channel with associated stochastic matrix $G$ satisfying $G_{jj'}>0$ for all $j,j'$. Then the spectrum of $\\Phi|_{\\cal D}$ is a subset of the interval $(-1,1]$. \n \n\n\\item[\\rm (b)] The channel $\\Phi$ is homogeneous if $V$ only allows energy conserving transitions, and with equal probability at any fixed energy, that is if\n$$\n|V_{jr,j's}|^2 = \\left\\{\n\\begin{array}{cl}\np_E & \\text{if $\\ve_j+\\eta_r = \\ve_{j'}+\\eta_s\\equiv E$}\\\\\n0 & \\text{if $\\ve_j+\\eta_r \\neq \\ve_{j'}+\\eta_s$}\n\\end{array}\n\\right.\n$$\nfor all total energies $E$ and some $p_E$.\n\\end{itemize}\n\\end{lem}\n\n{\\bf Proof of Lemma \\ref{lem3}.} \n(a) For a homogeneous channel we have $G=F$, so \\eqref{23} implies the intertwining relation $D^{-1}G = G^*D^{-1}$, or detailed balance condition, see \\cite{N}. This implies that $G$ is selfadjoint as an operator on the Hilbert space $\\h_D:=(\\mathbb C^d,\\langle \\cdot | \\cdot \\rangle_D)$, were the new inner product is \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{newip}\n\\langle \\varphi|\\psi\\rangle_D:=\\langle \\varphi|D^{-1}\\psi\\rangle.\n\\end{equation}\nIndeed, we have\n\\begin{align*}\n \\langle \\varphi | G \\psi\\rangle_D=\\langle \\varphi |D^{-1}G\\psi\\rangle=\\langle \\varphi |G^*D^{-1}\\psi\\rangle=\\langle G\\varphi |D^{-1}\\psi\\rangle=\\langle G\\varphi | \\psi\\rangle_D.\n\\end{align*}\nHence the spectrum of $G$ is real. \nWe already know from Lemma \\ref{c-lem} that $1$ is a simple eigenvalue of $G$ and all other eigenvalues have modulus strictly less than $1$. \n\n(b) Using the definition of $\\gamma_\\beta$ and expanding the trace over $\\h_\\rr$ in the basis $\\chi_k$ of $H_\\rr$, \\eqref{hamilts}, we obtain for the matrix elements,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{matelGF}\nG_{jj'} = \\sum_{r,s}\\frac{e^{-\\beta \\eta_s}}{Z_{\\beta,\\rr}} |V_{jr,j's}|^2,\\qquad F_{jj'} = \\sum_{r,s}\\frac{e^{-\\beta \\eta_s}}{Z_{\\beta,\\rr}} |V_{j's,jr}|^2,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $V_{ab,cd}=\\langle\\psi_a\\otimes\\chi_b, V\\psi_c\\otimes\\chi_d\\rangle$. Under the condition on $|V_{jr,j's}|^2$ in the Lemma we have $|V_{jr,j's}|^2=|V_{j's,jr}|^2$, so $G=F$. This concludes the proof of Lemma \\ref{lem3}.\\hfill\\qed\n\n\\bigskip\n\n\nWe close this Section with another general structural property of $\\Phi$, the monotony with respect to the free energy functional. For $\\beta\\in \\mathbb R$, let ${\\cal F}_\\beta$ be the real valued continuous map defined on the compact set of density matrices on $\\cal H$ by\n\\begin{align}\n{\\cal F}_\\beta(\\rho)=\\beta \\tr(\\rho H)-S(\\rho),\n\\end{align}\nwhere $S(\\rho)=-\\tr (\\rho\\ln \\rho)$.\nThe functional ${\\cal F}_\\beta$ is the free energy of $\\rho$ multiplied by $\\beta$. The relative entropy of $\\rho$ with respect to $\\sigma$, two density matrices s.t. $\\sigma>0$, is given by $S(\\rho|\\sigma)=\\tr(\\rho \\ln \\rho-\\rho \\ln \\sigma)$. By Klein's inequality, $S(\\rho|\\sigma)\\geq 0$ with equality if and only if $\\rho=\\sigma$ \\cite{C}.\n\n\\begin{lem}\\label{lem4}\nUnder the assumption \\eqref{comV} and for $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$ such that $\\Phi$ given in \\eqref{defphibeta'} is positive, we have for any density matrix $\\rho$, \n\\begin{align}\n\\label{73}\n{\\cal F}_\\beta(\\Phi(\\rho))\\leq {\\cal F}_\\beta(\\rho).\n\\end{align}\n\\end{lem}\n\\begin{proof}\nBy the data processing inequality, valid for positive trace-preserving $\\Phi$, \\cite{Li, U, M-HR}, and using that $\\gamma_\\beta$ is invariant under $\\Phi$ we have,\n\\begin{align}\n\\label{74}\nS(\\Phi(\\rho)|\\Phi(\\gamma_\\beta))=S(\\Phi(\\rho)|\\gamma_\\beta)\\leq S(\\rho | \\gamma_\\beta).\n\\end{align}\nNext, $S(\\rho | \\gamma_\\beta)=-S(\\rho)+\\beta \\tr(\\rho H)+\\ln(Z_\\beta)={\\cal F}_\\beta(\\rho)+\\ln(Z_\\beta)$ and the same holds for $\\rho$ replaced by $\\Phi(\\rho)$, namely $S(\\Phi(\\rho) | \\gamma_\\beta)={\\cal F}_\\beta(\\Phi(\\rho))+\\ln(Z_\\beta)$. Then \\eqref{74} implies \\eqref{73}.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\nLemma \\ref{lem4} provides a link between the energy the entropy variations under the action $\\Phi$, known as Landauer's bound: \n\\begin{align}\\label{lb}\n \\beta\\big[\\tr (\\Phi(\\rho)H)-\\tr(\\rho H)\\big]\\leq S(\\Phi(\\rho))-S(\\rho).\n\\end{align}\n\nComing back to our thermometer model of Section \\ref{sec:model} we recognize the left side of the inequality \\eqref{lb} as the flow $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ (see \\eqref{EvarA}) times $\\beta$, that is we have,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{76}\n\\beta Q_\\a(\\beta) \\le S(\\Phi_\\beta(\\rho))-S(\\rho).\n\\end{equation}\nSuppose $\\rho$ is such that $Q_\\a(0)>0$. Then $\\bop>0$. We know that $\\Phi_\\beta$ is CPTP for $\\beta>0$, so \\eqref{76} holds by Lemma \\ref{lem4}, and it shows that (recall that $Q_\\a(\\beta)$ is monotone decreasing)\n\\begin{align}\n\\label{entrobop}\nS(\\Phi_\\beta(\\rho))\\geq S(\\rho) \\ \\ \\text{for all} \\ \\ 0<\\beta\\leq \\bop.\n\\end{align}\nWe conclude that the von Neumann entropy can only increase under the application of the thermal channel $\\Phi_\\beta$, in the given range of parameters.\n\\medskip\n\n{\\it Remark.} For finite-dimensional $\\h_\\a,\\h_\\b$ a more refined argument shows the following result. For $\\rho$ such that $Q_\\a(0)>0$, we have $S(\\Phi(\\rho))-S(\\rho)>0$ for all $0<\\beta<\\bop$ and $S(\\Phi(\\rho))-S(\\rho)\\geq 0$ if $\\beta=\\bop$. (We do not present the proof here.)\n\n\n\n\\subsection{Application: Approach of equilibrium}\n\\label{sec:appreq}\n\nThe energy flow of the thermometer model of Section \\ref{sec:model} is given by \\eqref{EvarA}, \n\\begin{equation}\nQ_\\a(\\beta) = \\tr\\big(\\Phi_\\beta(\\rho) H_\\a \\big)-\\tr(\\rho H_\\a),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\Phi_\\beta$, defined in \\eqref{defPhibeta}, is a reduced thermal quantum channel. The associated stochastic matrix has the expression \\eqref{33} of Proposition \\ref{gjjp}, from which we see explicitly that $G_{jj'}>0$ for all $j,j'$. Lemma \\ref{lem3}(b) shows that $\\Phi_\\beta$ is a homogeneous channel, because $U$ only allows for energy conserving transitions with equal probability at fixed energy | this is the assumption (G). As a consequence of Lemmas \\ref{phiprop}, \\ref{c-lem} and Corollary \\ref{cor1} we obtain the following result.\n\n\\begin{thm}\n\\label{applithm}\nLet $\\Phi_\\beta$, \\eqref{defPhibeta}, be the reduced thermal quantum channel of the thermometer model of Section \\ref{sec:model}. Then \n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item[{\\rm (a)}] $\\Phi_\\beta$ leaves the space of diagonal matrices (w.r.t. $H_\\a$) invariant, and it leaves the space of off-diagonal matrices invariant: $\\Phi_\\beta=\\Phi_\\beta|_{\\mathcal D}\\oplus\\Phi_\\beta|_{\\mathcal O}$. \n\n\\item[{\\rm (b)}] If all nonzero Bohr energies $\\ve_j-\\ve_k$ of $H_\\a$ are distinct, then $\\Phi_\\beta|_{\\mathcal D}$ has a simple eigenvalue $1$ with associated spectral projection $|v_\\beta\\rangle\\langle v_0|$ (with $\\mathcal D$ identified with $\\mathbb C^d$ | see also \\eqref{ev0}, \\eqref{ev1}) and all other eigenvalues of $\\Phi_\\beta|_{\\mathcal D}$, as well as all eigenvalues of $\\Phi_\\beta|_{\\mathcal O}$, have modulus strictly less than $1$. \n\\end{itemize}\n\\end{thm}\n\nWe may let the system in an initial state $\\rho$ interact with the thermometer, then decouple it, resulting in the state $\\Phi_\\beta(\\rho)$, and letting it subsequently interact with a fresh thermometer (at the same temperature as the previous one). Repeating this process $k$ times gives a discrete dynamics on the system: \n\\begin{equation}\n\\rho\\mapsto \\rho^{(k)}\\equiv \\Phi_\\beta^k(\\rho),\\qquad k=1,2,\\ldots\n\\end{equation}\n(apply $k$ times the map $\\Phi_\\beta$ to $\\rho$). If the nonzero Bohr energies are distinct, then according to Theorem \\ref{applithm}(b), we have for any density matrix $\\rho$,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{rte}\n\\lim_{k\\rightarrow\\infty}\\rho^{(k)} =\\gamma_\\beta,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere the speed of convergence is exponentially fast in $k$. The relation \\eqref{rte} shows that a repeated interaction with fresh thermometers, all at a given temperature $\\beta$, drives the system to the equilibrium state $\\gamma_\\beta$. For $k$ sufficiently large, \\eqref{rte} ensures that $\\rho^{(k)}$ is not the ground nor the most excited state of $H_\\a$. Thus by Theorem \\ref{thm2}, $\\rho^{(k)}$ has a well defined contact temperature $\\bop^{(k)}\\in\\mathbb R$. It satisfies (see \\eqref{flow}),\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{51.1}\nQ_\\a (\\bop^{(k)}) = \\vve \\cdot G \\vec{p}^{\\, (k)} -\\vve\\cdot\\vec{p}^{\\, (k)} =0,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\vec{p}^{\\, (k)} = (p^{(k)}_1,\\ldots,p^{(k)}_d)$ is the vector of the populations of $\\rho^{(k)}$, with $p^{(k)}_j = \\langle\\psi^\\a_j|\\rho^{(k)}\\psi^\\a_j\\rangle$. Of course, $G$ and the $\\vec p^{\\, (k)}$ on the right side of \\eqref{51.1} depend on $\\beta$ and the solution of the equation gives $\\bop^{(k)}$. By \\eqref{rte}, we have $p_j^{(k)}\\rightarrow e^{-\\beta \\ve_j}/Z_\\a$ as $k\\rightarrow\\infty$. \n\nConsider now the flow $Q_\\a$ as a function of two variables, $\\beta>0$ and $R\\in\\mathbb C^{d^2}$ (the matrix elements of an operator acting on $\\mathbb C^d$). An explicit formula is given in \\eqref{qabeta'}, for example. Suppose we have $Q_\\a(\\beta_0,\\rho_0)=0$ for some $\\beta_0\\in\\mathbb R$ and some density matrix $\\rho_0$ (viewed as an element in $\\mathbb C^{d^2}$). Since $\\partial_\\beta Q_\n\\a(\\beta_0,\\rho_0)\\neq 0$ (this function is strictly monotonic, Theorem \\ref{thm2}), the implicit function theorem tells us that there is a unique map $R\\mapsto\\beta(R)$, defined and differentiable in a neighbourhood of $\\rho_0$, with $\\beta(\\rho_0)=\\beta_0$, such that $Q_\\a(\\beta(R),R)=0$. Now let $\\rho_0=\\gamma_\\beta$. We have $Q_\n\\a(\\beta,\\gamma_\\beta)=0$ (see the remarks after Theorem \\ref{thm2}), and for $k$ large, $\\rho^{(k)}$ is close to $\\gamma_\\beta$ due to \\eqref{rte}. By definition, $Q_\\a(\\bop^{(k)},\\rho^{(k)})=0$. Therefore by uniqueness, $\\beta(\\rho^{(k)})=\\bop^{(k)}$ for large $k$ and in particular, \n$$\n\\lim_{k\\rightarrow\\infty} \\bop^{(k)} = \\beta.\n$$\n\n\n\\noindent {\\bf Acknowledegments.} This work (A.J.) is partially supported by the French National Research Agency, grant Dynacqus ANR-24-CE40-5714-02. M.M.~was supported by a Discovery Grant from NSERC, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Reserach Council of Canada. Our thanks go to both our institutions for hosting mutual research visits. We thank D.~Spehner for useful discussions. \n\n\n\n\\appendix\n\n\\section{Proofs \\ref{Qunbounded}}\n\n\n\\subsection{Proof of Theorem \\ref{Qunbounded}}\n\\label{sec:proothm1}\nWe combine \\eqref{flow} with \\eqref{33},\n\\begin{align}\n\\label{38}\n Q_A=\\sum_{j j'=1}^{d}\\ve_j\\sum_{s=\\max\\{j,j'\\}}^{d}\\frac{1}{s}\\big(e^{-\\beta (\\ve_s-\\ve_{j'})}-e^{-\\beta (\\ve_{s+1}-\\ve_{j'})}\\big)p_{j'}-\\sum_{j=1}^{d} \\ve_j p_j.\n\\end{align}\nThe right sides of \\eqref{38} and of \\eqref{qabeta} are entire analytic functions in $\\beta\\in\\mathbb C$, which we call $F_1(\\beta)$ and $F_2(\\beta)$, respectively. To prove Theorem \\ref{Qunbounded} it suffices to show that $\\partial_\\beta^\\nu|_{\\beta=0}F_1(\\beta) =\\partial_\\beta^\\nu|_{\\beta=0}F_2(\\beta)$ for all $\\nu=0,1,2,\\ldots$ We have for $\\nu\\ge 1$\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{013}\n\\partial_\\beta^\\nu|_{\\beta=0}F_1(\\beta) = (-1)^\\nu \\sum_{jj'=1}^d \\ve_j p_{j'} \\sum_{k=M_{jj'}}^d\\frac{(\\ve_k-\\ve_{j'})^\\nu - (\\ve_{k+1}-\\ve_{j'})^\\nu}{k}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $M_{jj'}=\\max\\{j,j'\\}$. Our convention here is that if $k=d$ then $(\\ve_{k+1}-\\ve_{j'})^\\nu=0$. The sum over $k$ is telescopic,\n\\begin{align}\n\\label{014}\n\\sum_{k=M_{jj'}}^d&\\frac{(\\ve_k-\\ve_{j'})^\\nu - (\\ve_{k+1}-\\ve_{j'})^\\nu}{k} = \\frac{(\\ve_{M_{jj'}}-\\ve_{j'})^\\nu}{M_{jj'}} - \\sum_{k=M_{jj'}+1}^d \\frac{(\\ve_k-\\ve_{j'})^\\nu}{k(k-1)}\n\\end{align}\nwhere our convention is that the last sum is equal to zero for $M_{jj'}=d$. The equations \\eqref{013} and \\eqref{014}, together with the fact that $(\\ve_{M_{jj'}}-\\ve_{j'})^\\nu=0$ unless $j'<j$ give, \n\\begin{align}\n\\label{015}\n\\partial_\\beta^\\nu|_{\\beta=0}F_1(\\beta) =& (-1)^\\nu \\sum_{j'<j} \\ve_jp_{j'} \\frac{(\\ve_j-\\ve_{j'})^\\nu}j -(-1)^\\nu\\sum_{jj'k=1}^d\\chi\\big(k>M_{jj'} \\big) \\ve_j p_{j'} \\frac{(\\ve_k-\\ve_{j'})^\\nu}{k(k-1)}.\n\\end{align}\nNext we take the derivative of \\eqref{qabeta}, for $\\nu\\ge 1$, using that $\\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}(\n\\ve_k-\\ve_l) = (k-1)\\ve_k-\\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}\\ve_l$,\n\\begin{align}\n\\partial^\\nu_\\beta|_{\\beta=0} F_2(\\beta) =& \n (-1)^\\nu\\sum_{j<k} \\ve_k p_j \\frac{(\\ve_k-\\ve_j)^\\nu}{k} - (-1)^\\nu \\sum_{jkl=1}^d\\chi(j<k)\\chi(l<k) \\ve_l p_j \\frac{(\\ve_k-\\ve_j)^\\nu}{k(k-1)}.\n\\label{016}\n\\end{align}\nNoting that $\\chi(k>M_{jj'}) = \\chi(j<k)\\chi(j'<k)$ and doing a relabeling of the summation indices one sees that \\eqref{015} equals \\eqref{016}. This shows that the derivatives of all orders $\\nu\\ge1$ at $\\beta=0$ coincide, so that the two entire functions $F_1$ and $F_2$ differ by a constant. From \\eqref{qabeta} and \\eqref{38} we obtain $\\lim_{\\beta\\rightarrow\\infty}F_1(\\beta)=-\\sum_{k=2}^{d}\\frac{p_k}{k}\\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}(\\ve_k-\\ve_l)$ and \n\\begin{align*}\n\\lim_{\\beta\\rightarrow\\infty}F_2(\\beta)&=\\sum_{j\\leq j'}\\ve_j\\frac{p_{j'}}{j'}-\\sum_{j=1}^d\\ve_jp_j=\\sum_{j'=2}^d\\sum_{j=1}^{j'-1}\\ve_j\\frac{p_{j'}}{j'}-\\sum_{j=2}^d \\ve_j p_j(1-\\frac{1}{j})\\nonumber\\\\\n&=\\sum_{k=2}^d\\frac{p_{k}}{k}\\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}\\ve_l-\\sum_{k=2}^d\\frac{p_{k}}{k}\\ve_k (k-1)=\\sum_{k=2}^d\\frac{p_{k}}{k}\\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}(\\ve_l-\\ve_k),\n\\end{align*}\nwhere we used $k-1=\\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}1$. This shows that $F_1=F_2$. \n Finally, we use \\eqref{flow} and the fact that $G(\\beta=0)=\\frac1d \\mathbf 1 \\mathbf 1^T$ to get that $F_1(0)$ is given by \\eqref{qa0}. The proof of Theorem \\ref{Qunbounded} is complete. \\hfill\\qed\n\n\n\n\n\n\\subsection{Proof of Theorem \\ref{thm:QbetainR}}\n\\label{sec:proofthmQbar}\n\nOur first goal is to find an expression for $Q_{\\a,K}$ analogous to \\eqref{flow}, \\eqref{33}. Proceeding as in the proof of Proposition \\ref{gjjp} we have (see \\eqref{14}, \\eqref{matG})\n\\begin{align}\n\\label{12K}\n{\\rm Tr}& \\big(U(\\rho\\otimes\\tau_{\\beta,K}) U^* H_\\a\\big) = \\vec\\ve\\cdot G_K\\vec p,\\nonumber\\\\\n[G_K]_{jj'} &= \\sum_\\ell \\frac{1}{g_\\ell} \\sum_{k,k'=0}^K \\chi\\big(\\ve_j+\\eta_k=\\ve_{j'}+\\eta_{k'}=E_\\ell\\big) \\frac{e^{-\\beta \\eta_{k'}}}{Z_{\\b,K}}.\n\\end{align}\nWe recall the notation $\\eta_k=\\frac{k}{N}$, $E_\\ell=\\ve_1+\\frac{\\ell}{N}$ and $\\ve_j=\\ve_1+\\frac{\\ell_j}{N}$. \nThe constraint $\\chi(\\cdots)$ on the energies in \\eqref{12K} is,\n\\begin{align}\n\\ve_j+\\eta_k=\\ve_{j'}+\\eta_{k'}=E_\\ell &\\Longleftrightarrow \\ve_1+\\frac{\\ell_j}{N}+\\frac kN = \\ve_1+\\frac{\\ell_{j'}}{N}+\\frac{k'}{N} = \\ve_1+\\frac{\\ell}{N}\\nonumber\\\\\n& \\Longleftrightarrow \\ell_j+k=\\ell_{j'}+k'=\\ell.\n\\end{align}\nFor $j,j'$ fixed, the sums over $\\ell, k,k'$ in \\eqref{12K} reduce to the single sum over $\\ell$ in the range $\\max\\{\\ell_j,\\ell_{j'}\\}\\le \\ell\\le \\min\\{\\ell_j,\\ell_{j'}\\}+K$. Therefore, as $\\max\\{\\ell_j,\\ell_{j'}\\} = \\ell_{\\max\\{j,j'\\}}$ (and similar for the $\\min$), and as $\\eta_{k'}=E_\\ell-\\ve_{j'}$ in \\eqref{12K}, we have\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{12KK}\n[G_K]_{jj'} = \\frac{e^{\\beta\\ve_{j'}}}{Z_{\\b,K}} \\sum_{\\ell=\\ell_{\\max\\{j,j'\\}}}^{\\ell_{\\min\\{j,j'\\}}+K} \\frac{1}{g_\\ell} e^{-\\beta E_\\ell}.\n\\end{equation}\nWe assume that $K/N>\\ve_d-\\ve_1$. The lowest energy $E_\\ell$ is $\\ve_1$ and the highest one is $\\ve_d+K/N$. This interval is subdivided as\n$$\n\\ve_1 < \\ve_2 <\\cdots <\\ve_{d-1} <\\ve_d < \\ve_1+\\frac KN < \\ve_2+\\frac KN < \\cdots < \\ve_{d-1}+\\frac KN<\\ve_d +\\frac KN,\n$$\nwhich corresponds to the string of inequalities for the labels of the total energy $E_\\ell=\\ve_1+\\frac{\\ell}{N}$,\n$$\n0=\\ell_1 <\\ell_2<\\cdots <\\ell_{d-1} <\\ell_d < \\ell_1+K<\\ell_2+K<\\cdots< \\ell_{d-1}+K<\\ell_d+K.\n$$\nSet $\\ell_{d+1}=\\ell_1+K,\\, \\ell_{d+2}=\\ell_2+K,\\ldots, \\,\\ell_{2d}=\\ell_d+K$, so that the inequality string is $\\ell_1<\\ell_2<\\cdots<\\ell_{2d-1}<\\ell_{2d}$. The degeneracy $g_\\ell$ is constant in each subinterval: For $\\ell$ in the first to the $d$-th interval, $g_\\ell$ is ascending from $1$ to $d$ and after it is descending from $d-1$ back to $1$. Namely, $g_\\ell=j$ for $\\ell_j\\le \\ell<\\ell_{j+1}$ if $j=1,\\ldots,d-1$, then $g_\\ell=d$ for $\\ell_d\\le\\ell\\le\\ell_{d+1}$ and finally $g_\\ell= 2d-j$ if $\\ell_j< \\ell\\le\\ell_{j+1}$ for $j=d+1,\\ldots,2d-1$. \n\nDenote for a moment $m=\\min\\{j,j'\\}$ and $M=\\max\\{j,j'\\}$ (with $j,j'$ fixed). \nThe degeneracies in \\eqref{12KK} take the values \n\\begin{equation}\ng_\\ell = \\left\\{\n\\begin{array}{cl}\nM & \\text{for $\\ell_M\\le \\ell <\\ell_{M+1}$},\\\\\nM+1 & \\text{for $\\ell_{M+1}\\le \\ell <\\ell_{M+2}$},\\\\\n\\vdots & \\vdots\\\\\nd & \\text{for $\\ell_d\\le\\ell\\le\\ell_{d+1}$},\\\\\nd-1 & \\text{for $\\ell_{d+1}<\\ell\\le\\ell_{d+2}$},\\\\\n\\vdots & \\vdots\\\\\nd-m+1 & \\text{for $\\ell_{d+m-1} < \\ell\\le \\ell_{d+m}$.}\n\\end{array}\n\\right.\n\\end{equation}\nAccordingly, we have \n\\begin{align}\n[G_K]_{jj'} = \\frac{e^{\\beta\\ve_{j'}}}{Z_{\\b,K}} &\\Big[ \\sum_{s=\\max\\{j,j'\\}}^{d -1} \\frac{1}{s} \\sum_{\\ell_s\\le \\ell<\\ell_{s+1}}e^{-\\beta E_\\ell} &\\nonumber\\\\\n&+\\frac1d\\sum_{\\ell_d\\le\\ell\\le\\ell_{d+1}} e^{-\\beta E_\\ell}+ \\sum_{s=1}^{\\min\\{j,j'\\}-1} \\frac{1}{d-s} \\sum_{\\ell_{d+s}< \\ell\\le \\ell_{d+s+1}} e^{-\\beta E_\\ell}\\Big].\n\\label{12s}\n\\end{align}\nWe have $E_\\ell=\\ve_1+\\ell/N$ and the sums over $\\ell$ can be evaluated explicitly,\n$$\n\\sum_{r\\le \\ell\\le s}e^{-\\beta E_\\ell} = e^{-\\beta \\ve_1}\\, \\frac{e^{-\\beta r/N}-e^{-\\beta(s+1)/N}}{1-e^{-\\beta/N}}.\n$$\nThen\n\\begin{align}\n\\sum_{\\ell_s\\le\\ell<\\ell_{s+1}}e^{-\\beta E_\\ell} = \\frac{e^{-\\beta\\ve_s}-e^{-\\beta\\ve_{s+1}}}{1-e^{-\\beta/N}},&\\quad \\sum_{\\ell_d\\le \\ell\\le\\ell_{d+1}}e^{-\\beta E_\\ell} =\\frac{e^{-\\beta\\ve_d} - e^{-\\beta(K+1)/N}e^{-\\beta\\ve_1}}{1-e^{-\\beta/N}}\\nonumber\\\\\n\\sum_{\\ell_{d+s}<\\ell\\le\\ell_{d+s+1}}e^{-\\beta E_\\ell} = & \\ e^{-\\beta(K+1)/N} \\frac{e^{-\\beta\\ve_s}-e^{-\\beta\\ve_{s+1}}}{1-e^{-\\beta/N}}\n\\end{align}\nUsing the last formulas and \\eqref{f15} we obtain from \\eqref{12s},\n\\begin{align}\n\\label{f19}\n[G_K]_{jj'} = &\n\\frac{e^{\\beta\\ve_{j'}}}{1-e^{-\\beta(K+1)/N}}\n\\Big[ \\sum_{s=\\max\\{j,j'\\}}^{d-1}\\frac1s \\big(e^{-\\beta\\ve_s}-e^{-\\beta\\ve_{s+1}}\\big) \\nonumber\\\\\n& + e^{-\\beta(K+1)/N} \\sum_{s=1}^{\\min\\{j,j'\\}-1} \\frac{1}{d-s}\\big(e^{-\\beta\\ve_s}-e^{-\\beta\\ve_{s+1}}\\big) + \\frac1d \\big( e^{-\\beta\\ve_d} - e^{-\\beta(K+1)/N}e^{-\\beta\\ve_1}\\big)\\Big].\n\\end{align}\nFor $\\beta=0$ we have $Z_{\\b,K}=1+K$ (see also \\eqref{f15}), and using that $\\sum_{r\\le \\ell\\le s}1=s-r+1$ in \\eqref{12s} we arrive at\n\\begin{align}\n\\label{beta0}\n[G_K]_{jj'} = & \\frac1{K+1}\\Bigg[\\sum_{s=\\max\\{j,j'\\}}^{d-1}\\frac{(\\ve_{s+1}-\\ve_s)N}{s}+\\frac{K-(\\ve_d-\\ve_1)N}{d}+\\sum_{s=1}^{\\min\\{j,j'\\}-1}\\frac{(\\ve_{s+1}-\\ve_s)N}{d-s}\\Bigg].\n\\end{align}\nWe thus have shown that \n\\begin{align}\nG_{jj'}(\\beta)\\equiv \\lim_{K\\rightarrow\\infty}\n& [G_K]_{jj'}(\\beta)\\nonumber\\\\[10pt]\n = & \n\\left\\{\n\\begin{array}{cl}\ne^{\\beta\\ve_{j'}}\\sum_{s=\\max\\{j,j'\\}}^{d-1}\\frac{1}{s}\\big(e^{-\\beta \\ve_s}-e^{-\\beta \\ve_{s+1}}\\big) + e^{\\beta\\ve_{j'}}\\frac1d e^{-\\beta\\ve_d} & \\text{for $\\beta>0$,}\\\\[15pt]\n-e^{\\beta\\ve_{j'}} \\sum_{s=1}^{\\min\\{j,j'\\}-1}\\frac{1}{d-s} \\big(e^{-\\beta\\ve_s}-e^{-\\beta\\ve_{s+1}}\\big)+ e^{\\beta\\ve_{j'}}\\frac1d e^{-\\beta\\ve_1} & \\text{for $\\beta<0$,}\\\\[15pt]\n\\frac1d & \\text{for $\\beta=0$,}\n\\end{array}\n\\right.\n\\label{f22}\n\\end{align}\nwhere it is understood that the sums yield zero for $\\max\\{j,j'\\}=d$, respectively $\\min\\{j,j'\\}=1$.\nThe expression \\eqref{f22} for $\\beta>0$ coincides with \\eqref{33} and the branches of \\eqref{f22} for $\\beta\\neq 0$ as well as \\eqref{33} equal $1/d$ for $\\beta=0$. So \\eqref{f22} is a continuous extension of \\eqref{33} to $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$. We introduce the two matrices $G^\\pm(\\beta)$, each defined for $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$, by their matrix elements, (for \\eqref{f24} make a change of variables in the second branch of \\eqref{f22})\n\\begin{align}\nG_{jj'}^+(\\beta) & = e^{\\beta\\ve_{j'}}\\sum_{s=\\max\\{j,j'\\}}^{d-1}\\frac{1}{s}\\big(e^{-\\beta \\ve_s}-e^{-\\beta \\ve_{s+1}}\\big) + e^{\\beta\\ve_{j'}}\\frac1d e^{-\\beta\\ve_d},\\label{f23}\\\\[10pt]\nG_{jj'}^-(\\beta) & = -e^{\\beta\\ve_{j'}} \\sum^{d-1}_{s=d-\\min\\{j,j'\\}+1}\\frac{1}{s} \\big(e^{-\\beta\\ve_{d-s}}-e^{-\\beta\\ve_{d-s+1}}\\big)+ e^{\\beta\\ve_{j'}}\\frac1d e^{-\\beta\\ve_1}.\n\\label{f24}\n\\end{align}\nThen by \\eqref{f22}, $G(\\beta)=G^+(\\beta)$ for $\\beta>0$ and $G(\\beta)=G^-(\\beta)$ for $\\beta<0$. When we want to stress that $G^\\pm$ are functions of the energy vector $\\vec{\\ve}=(\\ve_1,\\ldots,\\ve_d)$, then we write $G^\\pm(\\beta,\\vec{\\ve}\\,)$. Consider now the linear map $V$ on $\\mathbb R^d\\rightarrow\\mathbb R^d$ defined on the canonical basis elements $\\vec{e}_j$ by\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{V}\nV\\vec{e}_j = \\vec{e}_{d-j+1},\\qquad j=1,\\ldots,d.\n\\end{equation}\n$V$ simply permutes coordinates of vectors, in particular, $\\ve_j\\leftrightarrow \\ve_{d-j+1}$. $V$ is unitary and $V^2=\\bbbone$. Then we have \n$$\n[G^-(\\beta, V\\vec{\\ve}\\,)]_{jj'} = e^{\\beta\\ve_{d-j'+1}} \\sum^{d-1}_{s=d-\\min\\{j,j'\\}+1}\\frac{1}{s} \\big(e^{-\\beta\\ve_{s}}-e^{-\\beta\\ve_{s+1}}\\big)+ e^{\\beta\\ve_{d-j'+1}}\\frac1d e^{-\\beta\\ve_d}.\n$$\nComparing with \\eqref{f23} we get $[G^+(\\beta,\\vec{\\ve}\\,)]_{d-j+1,d-j'+1} = [G^-(\\beta, V\\vec{\\ve}\\,)]_{jj'}$, and as $V^2=\\bbbone$,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{f28}\n[G^-(\\beta, \\vec{\\ve}\\,)]_{jj'} = [G^+(\\beta,V\\vec{\\ve}\\,)]_{d-j+1,d-j'+1} = \\big[V^*G^+(\\beta,V\\vec{\\ve}\\,) V\\big]_{jj'}.\n\\end{equation}\nNext we define, for $\\beta\\in\\mathbb R$, \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{f25}\nQ_\\a^\\pm(\\beta) = \\vec{\\ve}\\cdot G^\\pm(\\beta)\\vec{p} - \\vec{\\ve}\\cdot\\vec{p}.\n\\end{equation}\nThen as $G^-(\\beta,\\vec{\\ve}\\,)= V^* G^+(\\beta,V\\vec{\\ve}\\,)V$ by \\eqref{f28} and as $V$ is unitary, we obtain\n\\begin{align}\nQ^-_\\a(\\beta) = (V\\vec{\\ve}\\,)\\cdot G^+(\\beta, V\\vec{\\ve}\\,) V\\vec{p} -(V\\vec{\\ve}\\,)\\cdot(V\\vec{p}\\,). \n\\label{f30}\n\\end{align}\nIt follows from \\eqref{f22}, \\eqref{f23}, \\eqref{f24} that $G^\\pm(\\beta=0,\\vec\\ve\\,)=\\frac1d \\mathbf 1\\mathbf 1^T$ regardless of $\\vec\\ve$, so that \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{contflowzero}\nQ^+_\\a(0)=Q^-_\\a(0) = \\sum_{j=1}^d \\ve_j(\\frac1d -p_j).\n\\end{equation}\n\n\n\nThe right side of \\eqref{f30} is given by \\eqref{qabeta} in which $\\vec\\ve$ is replaced by \n$\\vec\\eta\\equiv V\\vec{\\ve}$ and $\\vec p$ is replaced by $\\vec q\\equiv V\\vec p$,\n\\begin{align}\nQ&^-_\\a(\\beta)=\\sum_{1\\leq j < k \\leq d}\\frac{e^{-\\beta (\\eta_k -\\eta_j)}}{k(k-1)}q_j \\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}(\\eta_k-\\eta_l)- \\sum_{k=2}^{d}\\frac{q_k}{k}\\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}(\\eta_k-\\eta_l)\\nonumber\\\\\n&=\\sum_{1\\leq j < k \\leq d}\\frac{e^{-\\beta (\\ve_{d-k+1} -\\ve_{d-j+1})}}{k(k-1)}p_{d-j+1} \\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}(\\ve_{d-k+1}-\\ve_{d-l+1})- \\sum_{k=2}^{d}\\frac{p_{d-k+1}}{k}\\sum_{l=1}^{k-1}(\\ve_{d-k+1}-\\ve_{d-l+1})\\nonumber\\\\\n&=\\sum_{1\\leq k < j \\leq d}\\frac{e^{-\\beta (\\ve_k -\\ve_j)}}{(d-k+1)(d-k)}p_j \\sum_{l=k+1}^{d}(\\ve_k-\\ve_l)- \\sum_{k=1}^{d-1}\\frac{p_k}{d-k+1}\\sum_{l=k+1}^{d}(\\ve_k-\\ve_l).\n\\label{fqabeta}\n\\end{align}\nEquivalently (as in \\eqref{qabeta'}),\n\\begin{align}\nQ^-_\\a(\\beta) = \\sum_{1\\le k< j\\le d} \\frac{e^{-\\beta(\\ve_k-\\ve_j)}p_j - p_k}{(d-k+1)(d-k)} \\sum_{l=k+1}^d(\\ve_k-\\ve_l).\n\\label{f31}\n\\end{align}\nThis concludes the proof of Theorem \\ref{thm:QbetainR}.\\hfill\\qed\n\\medskip\n\nFor $\\beta>0$, the matrix $G^+(\\beta)$ coincides with $G(\\beta)$ defined in \\eqref{33} and we established the spectral properties of the latter in Proposition \\ref{gjjp}. For completeness we address here the properties of $G^-(\\beta)$ for $\\beta < 0$.\n\\begin{lem}\nFor $\\beta<0$ the matrix $G^-(\\beta)$, \\eqref{f24} has a simple eigenvalue $1$, with corresponding eigenvector $v_\\beta$ (defined after \\eqref{ev1}), and its spectrum is a subset of $(0,1]$.\n\\end{lem}\n\\begin{proof}\nFor $K\\in \\mathbb N$ and $\\beta\\in \\mathbb R$ we consider the quantum channel $\\Phi_{\\beta, K}$ on $\\mathcal{B}(\\mathcal{H})$ given by\n\\begin{align}\\label{phiK}\n \\Phi_{\\beta, K}(X)={\\rm Tr} \\big(U(X\\otimes\\tau_{\\beta,K}) U^*\\big).\n\\end{align}\nLet $\\rho$ be a density matrix (with diagonal $\\vec p$\\,). By \\eqref{12K} we have $\\tr (\\Phi_{\\beta,K}(\\rho)H_\\a)=\\vec\\ve\\cdot G_K(\\beta)\\vec p$ with \n\\begin{align}\\label{GKPhiK}\n [G_K(\\beta)]_{jj'}= \\big[\\Phi_{K,\\beta}(\\ket{\\psi_{j'}}\\bra{\\psi_{j'}})\\big]_{jj}.\n\\end{align}\nNote that both $\\Phi_{\\beta, K}$ and $G_K(\\beta)$ are analytic functions of $\\beta\\in \\mathbb C$ for finite $K$.\nAs $\\Phi_{\\beta, K}$ is CPTP and leaves the Gibbs state $\\gamma_\\beta$ invariant, the matrix $G_K(\\beta)$ is stochastic and admits the $K$-independent vector $v_\\beta$ as invariant vector, see \\eqref{ev1}. Therefore, $G(\\beta)=\\lim_{K\\rightarrow\\infty}G_K(\\beta)$ is stochastic for all $\\beta\\in \\mathbb R$ and admits $v_\\beta$ as invariant vector as well. Since the channel $\\Phi_{K,\\beta}$ is homogeneous, the stochastic matrix $G_K(\\beta)$ satisfies the detailed balance relation $D^{-1}G_K(\\beta)=G_K(\\beta)^* D^{-1}$, where $D={\\rm diag}(e^{-\\beta \\ve_1},\\dots, e^{-\\beta \\ve_d})$ is independent of $K$, see \\eqref{23} and Lemma \\ref{lem3}. Hence, the detailed balance condition also holds for the limit stochastic matrix $G(\\beta)$, which implies, as in the proof of Lemma \\ref{lem3}, that the spectrum of $G(\\beta)$ lies in $[-1,1]$. \n\nWe now focus on the branch $G^-(\\beta)$ for $\\beta=-|\\beta|<0$. As $\\ve_{d-s}<\\ve_{d-s+1}$ the formula \\eqref{f24} gives $G^-_{j j'}(-|\\beta|)>e^{|\\beta|(\\ve_1-\\ve_{j'})}/d>0$. The Perron-Frobenius theorem then implies that $1$ is a simple eigenvalue of $G^-(-|\\beta|)$ and $-1$ is not an eigenvalue. Proceeding as in the proof of Proposition \\ref{gjjp}, following \\eqref{yyy}, we introduce the matrix $\\Gamma^-$ by $G^-(\\beta)=\\Gamma^- D^{-1}$ so that\n\\begin{align}\n \\Gamma_{jj'}^- &= \\sum^{d-1}_{s=d-\\min\\{j,j'\\}+1}\\frac{1}{s} \\big(e^{|\\beta|\\ve_{d-s+1}}-e^{|\\beta|\\ve_{d-s}}\\big)+ \\frac1d e^{|\\beta|\\ve_1}.\n\\end{align}\nBy the algebraic arguments in the proof of Proposition \\ref{gjjp}, the matrix $\\Gamma^-$ is positive definite if and only if the spectrum of $G^-(-|\\beta|)$ is strictly positive. \nSetting \n\\begin{align}\\label{gmoins}\n g_j^-=\\begin{cases}\\sum_{s=d-j+1}^{d-1} \\frac{1}{s} \\big(e^{|\\beta|\\ve_{d-s+1}}-e^{|\\beta|\\ve_{d-s}}\\big)+\\frac1d e^{|\\beta|\\ve_1} \\ &\\text{if} \\ j>1 \\\\\n \\frac1d e^{|\\beta|\\ve_1} \\ &\\text{if} \\ j=1,\n \\end{cases} \n\\end{align}\nsuch that $g_d^->g_{d-1}^->\\dots > g_1^->0$, the matrix $\\Gamma^-$ reads\n\\begin{align}\n \\Gamma^-= \\begin{pmatrix}\ng_1^- & g_1^-& g_1^- & \\dots & g_1^- \\\\\ng_1^- & g_2^- & g_2^- & \\cdots & g_2^-\\\\\ng_1^- & g_2^- & g_3^- & \\cdots & g_3^- \\\\\n\\vdots & \\vdots & \\vdots & \\ddots & \\vdots\\\\\ng_1^- & g_2^- & g_3^- & \\dots & g_d^-\n\\end{pmatrix} = T_-P_-T_-^*, \\qquad T_-=\\begin{pmatrix}\n1 & 0& 0 & \\dots & 0 \\\\\n1 & 1 & 0 & \\cdots & 0\\\\\n1 & 1 & 1 & \\cdots & 0 \\\\\n\\vdots & \\vdots & \\vdots & \\ddots & \\vdots\\\\\n1 & 1 & 1 & \\dots & 1\n\\end{pmatrix},\n\\end{align}\nand where $P_-=\\text{diag}(g_1^-, g_2^--g_1^-, \\dots, g_{d-1}^--g_{d-2}^-, g_d^--g_{d-1}^-)$ is a strictly positive definite matrix.\n\\end{proof}\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\\begin{thebibliography}{99}\n\n\n\\bibitem{Alipour}\nS.~Alipour, F.~Benatti, M.~Afsary, F.~Bakhshinezhad, M.~Ramezani, T.~Ala-Nissila, A.T.~Rezakhani: {\\it Temperature\nin nonequilibrium quantum systems}, arXiv:2105.11915\n\n\\bibitem{BLPS}\nN.~Brunner, N.~Linden, S.~Popescu, P.~Skrzypczyk: {\\it Virtual qubits, virtual temperatures, and the foundations of thermodynamics}, Phys.~Rev.~E {\\bf 85}, 051117 (2012)\n\n\\bibitem{C} E.~Carlen: {\\it Trace inequalities and quantum entropy: an introductory course},\nEntropy and the Quantum, Contemporary Mathematics, {\\bf 529}, 73-140 (2010)\n\n\\bibitem{Casas}\nJ. Casas-V\\'azquez, D. Jou: {\\it Temperature in non-equilibrium states: a review of open problems and current proposals}, Rep.~Prog.~Phys.~{\\bf 66} 1937-2023 (2003)\n\n\\bibitem{D} J.~Dieudonn\\'e: {\\it Foundations of Modern Analysis}, Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 10. Academic Press, New York, 1969\n\n\\bibitem{EH-K} D.E.~Evans, R.~Høegh-Krohn: {\\it Spectral\nProperties of Positive Maps on C*-Algebras}, Journal of the London\nMathematical Society, vols. s2-17, p. 345-355, (1978)\n\n\n\\bibitem{H} \nA.~Holevo: {\\it Quantum Systems, channels, Information, a mathematical introduction}, De Gruyter, 2012\n\n\n\\bibitem{KLW} S.~Khatri, L.~Lami, M.M.~Wilde: {\\it Principles of\nQuantum Communication Theory: A Modern Approach}, ArXiv 2011.04672\n\n\\bibitem{KouKou}\nN.~Koukoulekidis, R.~Alexander, T.~Hebdigel, D.~Jennings: {\\it The geometry of passivity for quantum systems and a novel elementary derivation of the Gibbs state}, Quantum {\\bf 5}, 411 (2021)\n\n\n\\bibitem{Kr} K.~Kraus: {\\it States, Effects and Operations: Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory}, Lecture Notes in Physics {\\bf 190}, Springer Verlag (1983)\n\n\n\\bibitem{Li} \nG.~Lindblad: {\\it Completely positive maps and entropy inequalities}, Comm.~Math.~Phys., {\\bf 40}, 147–151 (1975)\n\n\n\\bibitem{Lo} \nM.~Lostaglio: {\\it An introductory review of the resource theory approach to thermodynamics}, \n{\\it Rep. Prog. Phys.} {\\bf 82}, 114001, (2019)\n\n\\bibitem{LAP} \nM.~Lostaglio, A.M.~Alhambra, C.~Perry: {\\it Elementary Thermal Operations}, \n{\\it Quantum}, {\\bf 2}, 52, (2018)\n\n\n\\bibitem{LPB} P.~Lipka-Bartosik, M.~Perarnau-Llobet, N.~Brunner: {\\it Operational Definition of the Temperature of a Quantum State}, Phys.~Rev.~Lett., {\\bf 130}, 040401 (2023)\n\n\n\n\\bibitem{NMlectnotes}\nM.~Merkli, A.~Neira: {\\it Lectures on open quantum systems}, Can.~J.~Phys.~{\\bf 104}, 1-13 (2026)\n\n\\bibitem{M-HR}A.~M\\\"uller-Hermes, D.~Reeb: {\\it Monotonicity of the Quantum Relative Entropy Under Positive Maps}, {\\it Ann. Henri Poincar\\'e}, {\\bf 18}, 1777–1788 (2017).\n\n\\bibitem{Muschik}\nW.~Muschik: {\\it Empirical foundation and axiomatic treatment of non-equilibrium temperature}, Arch.~Ration.~Mech.~Anal.~{\\bf 66} 379-401 (1977)\n\n\\bibitem{N} J.R.~Norris: {\\it Markov chains}, Cambridge University Press (1997)\n\n\\bibitem{S} R.~Schrader: {\\it Perron-Frobenius theory for positive maps on\ntrace ideals}, Fields Inst. Commun., {\\bf 30}, 107–182 (2006)\n\n\n\\bibitem{U} A.~Uhlmann: {\\it Relative entropy and the Wigner-Yanase-Dyson-Lieb concavity in an interpolation theory}, Commun.~Math.~Phys. {\\bf 54}, 21–32 (1977) \n\n\\end{thebibliography}\n\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091170,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31970"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31970"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Martin Bladt"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Martin Bladt and Marcus Christiansen"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Payment Process Estimation in Aggregated Insurance Models"},"comments":{"kind":"null"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"stat.ME math.PR math.ST stat.TH"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Insurance payments may depend on latent micro states although only macro states and realized payments are observed. We study a sojourn-payment model for such aggregated multi-state systems under left-truncation and right-censoring. Starting from a micro-to-macro projection, we establish strong consistency and weak convergence for inverse-probability-weighted estimators of state-specific cumulative payment processes."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:11:55 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:11:55 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Bladt","Martin",""],["Christiansen","Marcus",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Bladt\",\n \"Martin\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Christiansen\",\n \"Marcus\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: final.bbl\n================================================\n\\begin{thebibliography}{}\n\n\\bibitem[Ahmad and Bladt, 2023]{AhmadBladt2023}\nAhmad, J. and Bladt, M. (2023).\n\\newblock Aggregate markov models in life insurance: estimation via the em\n algorithm.\n\n\\bibitem[Ahmad and Bladt, 2024]{AhmadBladt2024}\nAhmad, J. and Bladt, M. (2024).\n\\newblock Aggregate markov models in life insurance: estimation via the em\n algorithm.\n\\newblock {\\em Scandinavian Actuarial Journal}, 2024(6):533--560.\n\n\\bibitem[Ahmad et~al., 2023]{AhmadBladtFurrer2023}\nAhmad, J., Bladt, M., and Furrer, C. (2023).\n\\newblock {Aggregate Markov models in life insurance: Properties and\n valuation}.\n\\newblock {\\em Insurance: Mathematics and Economics}, 113:50--69.\n\n\\bibitem[Andersen and Lollike, 2024]{Andersen2024}\nAndersen, I. and Lollike, A. (2024).\n\\newblock Efficient projections of with-profit life insurance using lumping.\n\\newblock {\\em European Actuarial Journal}, 14:21--61.\n\n\\bibitem[Andersen et~al., 2012]{AndersenBorganGillKeiding2012}\nAndersen, P., Borgan, {\\O}., Gill, R., and Keiding, N. (2012).\n\\newblock {\\em Statistical models based on counting processes}.\n\\newblock Springer Science \\& Business Media.\n\n\\bibitem[Bladt and Furrer, 2025]{BladtFurrer2025}\nBladt, M. and Furrer, C. (2025).\n\\newblock {Conditional Aalen--Johansen estimation}.\n\\newblock {\\em Scandinavian Journal of Statistics}, 52(2):873--902.\n\n\\bibitem[Furrer and Sandqvist, 2025]{FurrerSandqvist2025}\nFurrer, C. and Sandqvist, O. (2025).\n\\newblock Loss of earning capacity in denmark--an actuarial perspective.\n\\newblock {\\em arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.11578}.\n\n\\bibitem[Linton and Nielsen, 1995]{LintonNielsen1995}\nLinton, O. and Nielsen, J.~P. (1995).\n\\newblock A kernel method of estimating structured nonparametric regression\n based on marginal integration.\n\\newblock {\\em Biometrika}, pages 93--100.\n\n\\bibitem[Milbrodt and R{\\\"o}hrs, 2016]{MilbrodtRoehra2016}\nMilbrodt, H. and R{\\\"o}hrs, V. (2016).\n\\newblock {\\em Aktuarielle Methoden der deutschen Privaten\n Krankenversicherung}, volume~34.\n\\newblock VVW GmbH.\n\n\\bibitem[Milhaud and Dutang, 2018]{MilhaudDutang2018}\nMilhaud, X. and Dutang, C. (2018).\n\\newblock Lapse tables for lapse risk management in insurance: a competing risk\n approach.\n\\newblock {\\em European Actuarial Journal}, 8(1):97--126.\n\n\\bibitem[Ramlau-Hansen, 1983]{RamlauHansen1988}\nRamlau-Hansen, H. (1983).\n\\newblock Smoothing counting process intensities by means of kernel functions.\n\\newblock {\\em The Annals of Statistics}, pages 453--466.\n\n\\bibitem[Reck et~al., 2025]{ReckSchuppReuss2025}\nReck, L., Schupp, J., and Reu\\ss, A. (2025).\n\\newblock A multistate analysis of policyholder behaviour in life\n insurance—lasso-based modelling approaches.\n\\newblock {\\em Risks}, 13(4).\n\n\\end{thebibliography}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: final.bib\n================================================\n@book{AalenBorganGjessing2008,\n\tAuthor = {O.O. Aalen and {\\O}. Borgan and H.K. Gjessing},\n\tTitle = {Survival and {E}vent {H}istory {A}nalysis},\n\tPublisher = {Springer-Verlag New York},\n\tSeries = {Statistics for Biology and Health},\n\tdoi\t= {10.1007/978-0-387-68560-1},\n\tYear = {2008}}\n\n@article{AdeChristiansen2017,\nauthor = {F. Ad{\\'e}kambi and M.C. Christiansen},\ntitle = {Integral and differential equations for the moments of multistate models in health insurance},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {2017},\npages = {29-50},\nyear = {2017},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461238.2015.1058854}}\n\n@misc{AhmadBladt2023,\n title={Aggregate Markov models in life insurance: estimation via the EM algorithm}, \n author={Jamaal Ahmad and Mogens Bladt},\n year={2023},\n eprint={2212.10661},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={math.ST},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10661} \n}\n\n@misc{AhmadBuchardtFurrer2021,\n title={Computation of bonus in multi-state life insurance},\n author={J. Ahmad and K. Buchardt and C. Furrer},\n year={2021},\n eprint={2007.04051},\n archivePrefix={arXiv}}\n\n@article{AhmadBladtFurrer2023,\n title={{Aggregate Markov models in life insurance: Properties and valuation}},\n author={Jamaal Ahmad and Martin Bladt and Christian Furrer},\n journal={Insurance: Mathematics and Economics},\n volume={113},\n pages={50-69},\n year={2023},\n doi={10.1016/j.insmatheco.2023.07.006}}\n\n@article{AhmadBladt2024,\nauthor = {Jamaal Ahmad and Mogens Bladt},\ntitle = {Aggregate Markov models in life insurance: estimation via the EM algorithm},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {2024},\nnumber = {6},\npages = {533-560},\nyear = {2024},\npublisher = {Taylor \\& Francis},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461238.2023.2277786}}\n\n@article{AndersenBorganGillKeiding1988,\nauthor = {P.K. Andersen and {\\O}. Borgan and R.D. Gill and N. Keiding},\ntitle = {Censoring, truncation and filtering in statistical models based on counting processes},\njournal = {Contemporary Mathematics},\nvolume = {80},\npages = {19-60},\nyear = {1988},\ndoi = {10.1090/conm/080/999006}}\n\n@book{AndersenBorganGillKeiding1993,\n\tAuthor = {P.K. Andersen and {\\O}. Borgan and R.D. Gill and N. Keiding},\n\tTitle = {Statistical {M}odels {B}ased on {C}ounting {P}rocesses},\n\tPublisher = {Springer, New York},\n\tSeries = {Springer Series in Statistics},\n\tdoi\t= {10.1007/978-1-4612-4348-9},\n\tYear = {1993}}\n\n@book{AndersenBorganGillKeiding2012,\n title={Statistical models based on counting processes},\n Author = {P.K. Andersen and {\\O}. Borgan and R.D. Gill and N. Keiding},\n year={2012},\n publisher={Springer Science \\& Business Media}\n}\n\n\n@article{Andersen2024,\n title={Efficient projections of with-profit life insurance using lumping},\n author={I.E. Andersen and A.S. Lollike},\n journal={European Actuarial Journal},\n volume={14},\n pages={21-61},\n year={2024},\n publisher={Springer}}\n\n@book{AsmussenSteffensen2020,\n\tAuthor = {S. Asmussen and M. Steffensen},\n\tTitle = {Risk and Insurance},\n\tPublisher = {Springer, Cham},\n\tSeries = {Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling},\n\tdoi\t= {10.1007/978-3-030-35176-2},\n\tYear = {2020}}\n\n@article{Bachelier1900,\n author = {L. Bachelier},\n title = {Th\\'eorie de la sp\\'eculation},\n journal = {Annales scientifiques de l'\\'Ecole Normale Sup\\'erieure},\n volume = {Serie 3, Volume 17},\n year = {1900},\n pages = {21-86},\n doi = {10.24033/asens.476}}\n\n@misc{BathkeFurrer2024,\n author = {T. Bathke and C. Furrer},\n title = {{Non-parametric estimators of scaled cash flows}},\n note = {Preprint, arXiv:2408.13176},\n year = {2024}}\n\n\n@article{Battauz2003,\n\ttitle={Quadratic hedging for asset derivatives with discrete stochastic dividends},\n\tvolume={32},\n\tdoi={10.1016/S0167-6687(02)00212-3},\n\tnumber={2},\n\tjournal={Insurance: Mathematics and Economics},\n\tauthor={A. Battauz},\n\tyear={2003},\n\tpages={229-243}\n}\n\n@article{Bauer2012,\n\tAuthor = {D. Bauer and F.E. Benth and R. Kiesel},\n\tJournal = {SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics},\n\tPages = {639–666},\n\tTitle = {Modeling the {F}orward {S}urface of {M}ortality},\n\tVolume = {3},\n\tdoi = {10.1137/100818261},\n\tYear = {2012}}\n\n@article{Biagini2016,\ntitle={Risk {M}inimization for {I}nsurance {P}roducts via {F}-{D}oubly {S}tochastic {M}arkov {C}hains},\nvolume={4},\nDOI={10.3390/risks4030023},\nnumber={3},\njournal={Risks},\nauthor={F. Biagini and A. Groll and J. Widenmann},\nyear={2016},\npages={23}}\n\n@article{BijwaardEtAl2015,\nauthor = {N.L. {Van Der Gaag} and G. Bijwaard and J. {de Beer} and L. Bonneux},\ntitle={A multistate model to project elderly disability in case of limited data},\njournal = {Demographic Research},\nvolume = {32},\nnumber = {3},\npages = {75-106},\ndoi = {10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.3},\nyear = {2015}}\n\n@book{Bjork2009,\n\ttitle={Arbitrage {T}heory in {C}ontinuous {T}ime},\n\tedition={3},\n\tdoi={10.1093/0199271267.001.0001},\n\tauthor={T. Bj{\\\"o}rk},\n\tyear={2009},\n\tseries={Oxford Finance Series},\n\tpublisher={Oxford University Press, Oxford}}\n\n@article{Bladt2020,\nauthor = {M. Bladt and S. Asmussen and M. Steffensen},\ntitle = {Matrix representations of life insurance payments},\njournal = {European Actuarial Journal},\nyear = {2020},\ndoi = {10.1007/s13385-019-00222-0}}\n\n@article{BladtFurrer2025,\n title={{Conditional Aalen--Johansen estimation}},\n author={Bladt, Martin and Furrer, Christian},\n journal={Scandinavian Journal of Statistics},\n volume={52},\n number={2},\n pages={873--902},\n year={2025},\n publisher={Wiley Online Library}\n}\n\n@misc{BladtMincaPeralta2023,\n author = {M. Bladt and A. Minca and O. Peralta},\n title = {{Pathwise and distributional approximations of semi-Markov processes}},\n note = {Preprint, arXiv:2312.06784},\n year = {2023}}\n\n@article{BrennanSchwartz1979a,\n author = {M.J. Brennan and E.S. Schwartz},\n journal = {The Journal of Business},\n volume = {52},\n pages = {63-93},\n doi = {10.1086/296034},\n title = {Alternative {I}nvestment {S}trategies for the {I}ssuers of {E}quity {L}inked {L}ife {I}nsurance {P}olicies with an {A}sset {V}alue {G}uarantee},\n year = {1979}}\n\n@book{BrennanSchwartz1979b,\n\tAuthor = {M.J. Brennan and E.S. Schwartz},\n\tTitle = {Pricing and {I}nvestment {S}trategies for {G}uaranteed {E}quity-{L}inked {L}ife {I}nsurance},\n\tNote = {S.S. Huebner Foundation for Insurance Education, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia},\n\tYear = {1979}}\n\n@article{BruhnLollike2020,\ntitle={Retrospective reserves and bonus},\njournal={Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\ndoi={10.1080/03461238.2020.1809509},\nauthor={K. Bruhn and A.S. Lollike},\nyear={2020},\nnote={to appear}}\n\n@article{Buchardt2014,\n\tAuthor = {K. Buchardt},\n\tJournal = {Insurance: Mathematics and Economics},\n\tPages = {167-179},\n\tTitle = {Dependent interest and transition rates in life insurance},\n\tVolume = {55},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.insmatheco.2014.01.004},\n\tYear = {2014}}\n\n@article{BuchardtMoller2015,\ntitle={Life {I}nsurance {C}ash {F}lows with {P}olicyholder {B}ehavior},\nvolume={3},\nnumber={3},\njournal={Risks},\nauthor={K. Buchardt and T. M{\\o}ller},\nyear={2015},\npages={290–317},\ndoi={10.3390/risks3030290}}\n\n@article{BuchardtMollerSchmidt2015,\ndoi = {10.1080/03461238.2013.879919},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {2015},\nnumber = {8},\nyear = {2015},\npages = {660-688},\ntitle = {Cash flows and policyholder behaviour in the semi-{M}arkov life insurance setup},\nauthor = {K. Buchardt and T. M{\\o}ller and K.B. Schmidt}\n}\n\n@article{Buchardt2016,\n\tAuthor = {K. Buchardt},\n\tJournal = {Advances in Applied Probability},\n\tPages = {423-442},\n\tTitle = {Continuous affine processes: transformations, {M}arkov chains and life insurance},\n\tVolume = {48},\n\tNumber = {2},\n\tdoi = {10.1017/apr.2016.8},\n\tYear = {2016}}\n\n@article{Buchardt2017,\n\tAuthor = {K. Buchardt},\n\tJournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\n\tPages = {377-394},\n\tTitle = {Kolmogorov’s forward {PIDE} and forward transition rates in life insurance},\n\tVolume = {2017},\n\tNumber = {5},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/03461238.2016.1160255},\n\tYear = {2017}}\n\n@article{BuchardtMoller2018,\n\ttitle={Hedging and {C}ash {F}lows in the {P}resence of {T}axes and {E}xpenses in {L}ife and {P}ension {I}nsurance},\n\tvolume={6},\n\tdoi={10.3390/risks6030068},\n\tnumber={3},\n\tjournal={Risks},\n\tauthor={K. Buchardt and T. M{\\o}ller},\n\tyear={2018}}\n\n@article{BuchardtFurrerSteffensen2019,\nauthor = {K. Buchardt and C. Furrer and M. Steffensen},\ntitle = {Forward transition rates},\njournal = {Finance and Stochastics},\nvolume = {23},\nnumber = {4},\npages = {975–999},\nyear = {2019},\ndoi = {10.1007/s00780-012-0182-3}}\n\n@article{BuchardtFurrerMoller2020,\nauthor = {K. Buchardt and C. Furrer and T. M{\\o}ller},\ntitle = {Tax- and expense-modified risk-minimization for insurance payment processes},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nnote = {to appear},\nyear = {2020},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461238.2020.1790413}}\n\n@article{BuhlmannStraub1970,\nauthor={H. B{\\\"u}hlmann and E. Straub},\ntitle={Glaubw{\\\"u}rdigkeit f{\\\"u}r {S}chadens{\\\"a}tze},\njournal={Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Schweizerischer Versicherungsmathematiker},\nvolume={70},\npages={111-133},\nyear={1970}}\n\n@article{Buhlmann1989,\nauthor={H. B{\\\"u}hlmann},\ntitle={Actuaries of the {T}hird {K}ind?},\nvolume={19},\ndoi={10.1017/S0515036100008576},\nnumber={S1},\njournal={ASTIN Bulletin}, \nyear={1989}, \npages={5-6}}\n\n@article{Cantelli1914,\nauthor={F.P. Cantelli},\ntitle={Genesi e costruzione delle tavole di mutualit{\\`a}},\nvolume={3/4},\njournal={Bolletino di Notizie sul Credito e sulla Previdenza}, \nyear={1914}, \npages={247-303}}\n\n@phdthesis{Christiansen2006,\n author = {M.C. Christiansen},\n title = {A joint analysis of financial and biometrical risks in life insurance},\n school = {University of Rostock},\n year = {2006}}\n\n@article{Christiansen2008a,\ntitle = \"A sensitivity analysis concept for life insurance with respect to a valuation basis of infinite dimension\",\njournal = \"Insurance: Mathematics and Economics\",\nvolume = \"42\",\nnumber = \"2\",\npages = \"680-690\",\nyear = \"2008\",\ndoi = \"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.07.005\",\nauthor = \"M.C. Christiansen\"}\n\n@article{Christiansen2008b,\ntitle = \"A sensitivity analysis of typical life insurance contracts with respect to the technical basis\",\njournal = \"Insurance: Mathematics and Economics\",\nvolume = \"42\",\nnumber = \"2\",\npages = \"787-796\",\nyear = \"2008\",\ndoi = \"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.08.005\",\nauthor = \"M.C. Christiansen\"}\n\n@article{Christiansen2012,\nauthor = {M.C. Christiansen},\ntitle = {Multistate models in health insurance},\njournal = {Advances in Statistical Analysis},\nvolume = {96},\npages = {155-186},\nyear = {2012},\ndoi = {10.1007/s10182-012-0189-2}}\n\n@article{ChristiansenNiemeyer2015,\n\tAuthor = {M.C. Christiansen and A. Niemeyer},\n\tJournal = {Finance and Stochastics},\n\tPages = {295-327},\n\tTitle = {On the forward rate concept in multi-state life insurance},\n\tVolume = {19},\n\tNumber = {2},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s00780-014-0244-9},\n\tYear = {2015}}\n\n@article{ChristiansenSchinzinger2016,\nauthor={M.C. Christiansen and E. Schinzinger},\ntitle={A credibility approach for combining likelihood of generalized linear models},\njournal={ASTIN Bulletin},\nvolume={46},\nnumber={3},\npages={531-569},\nyear={2016},\ndoi={10.1017/asb.2016.11}}\n\n@article{ChristiansenDjehiche2020,\n author=\"M.C. Christiansen and B. Djehiche\",\ntitle = \"Nonlinear reserving and multiple contract modifications in life insurance\",\njournal = \"Insurance: Mathematics and Economics\",\nvolume = \"93\",\npages = \"187-195\",\nyear = \"2020\",\ndoi = \"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.05.004\"}\n\n@article{Christiansen2021,\n title={Time-dynamic evaluations under non-monotone information generated by marked point processes},\n author={M.C. Christiansen},\n journal={Finance and Stochastics},\n year={2021},\n doi={10.1007/s00780-021-00456-5},\n note={to appear}}\n\n@article{ChristiansenDenuitDhaene2014,\n title={Reserve-dependent benefits and costs in life and health insurance contracts},\n author={M.C. Christiansen and M.M. Denuit and J. Dhaene},\n journal={Insurance: Mathematics and Economics},\n volume={57},\n pages={132-137},\n year={2014},\n doi={10.1016/j.insmatheco.2014.05.009}}\n\n@article{ChristiansenFurrer2021,\n title={{Dynamics of state-wise prospective reserves in the presence of non-monotone information}},\n author={M.C. Christiansen and C. Furrer},\n journal={Insurance: Mathematics and Economics},\n volume={97},\n pages={81-98},\n doi={10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.01.005},\n year={2021}}\n\n@article{Christiansen2021b,\n title={On the calculation of prospective and retrospective reserves in non-{M}arkov models},\n author={M.C. Christiansen},\n journal={European Actuarial Journal},\n year={2021},\n volume={11},\n number={2},\n pages={441-462},\n doi={10.1007/s13385-021-00277-y}}\n\n@article{CohenElliot2012,\nauthor = \"S.N. Cohen and R.J. Elliott\",\ndoi = \"10.1214/11-AOP679\",\njournal = \"The Annals of Probability\",\nnumber = \"5\",\npages = \"2264-2297\",\ntitle = \"{Existence, uniqueness and comparisons for BSDEs in general spaces}\",\nvolume = \"40\",\nyear = \"2012\"}\n\n@article{Dahl2004,\n\tAuthor = {M. Dahl},\n\tJournal = {Insurance: Mathematics and Economics},\n\tPages = {113-136},\n\tTitle = {Stochastic mortality in life insurance: market reserves and mortality-linked insurance contracts},\n\tVolume = {35},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.insmatheco.2004.05.003},\n\tYear = {2004}}\n\n@article{DahlMoller2006,\n\tAuthor = {M. Dahl and T. M{\\o}ller},\n\tJournal = {Insurance: Mathematics and Economics},\n\tPages = {193-217},\n\tTitle = {Valuation and hedging of life insurance liabilities with systematic mortality risk},\n\tVolume = {39},\n\tNumber\t= {2},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.02.007},\n\tYear = {2006}}\n\n@article{DattaSatten2001,\ntitle = {Validity of the {Aalen}-{Johansen} estimators of stage occupation probabilities and {Nelson}-{Aalen} estimators of integrated transition hazards for non-{Markov} models},\njournal = {Statistics \\& Probability Letters},\nvolume = {55},\nnumber = {4},\npages = {403-411},\nyear = {2001},\ndoi = {10.1016/S0167-7152(01)00155-9},\nauthor = {S. Datta and G.A. Satten}}\n\n@article{DeprezShevchenkoWuthrich2017,\nauthor={P. Deprez and P.V. Shevchenko and M.V. W{\\\"u}thrich},\ntitle={Machine learning techniques for mortality modeling},\njournal={European Actuarial Journal},\nvolume={7},\nnumber={2},\npages={337-352},\nyear={2017},\ndoi={10.1007/s13385-017-0152-4}}\n\n@article{DjehicheLofdahl2016,\ntitle = {Nonlinear reserving in life insurance: Aggregation and mean-field approximation},\nauthor = {B. Djehiche and B. L{\\\"o}fdahl},\nyear = {2016},\njournal = {Insurance: Mathematics and Economics},\nvolume = {69},\nnumber = {3},\npages = {1-13},\ndoi = {10.1016/j.insmatheco.2016.04.002}}\n\n@book{DudleyNorvaisa2011,\n\tAuthor = {R.M. Dudley and R. Norvai$\\check{s}$a},\n\tTitle = {Concrete Functional Calculus},\n\tPublisher = {Springer, New York},\n\tSeries = {Springer Monographs in Mathematics},\n\tdoi\t= {10.1007/978-1-4419-6950-7},\n\tYear = {2011}}\n\n@article{DuffiePanSingleton2000,\n\tAuthor = {D. Duffie and J. Pan and K. Singleton},\n\tJournal = {Econometrica},\n\tPages = {1343–1376},\n\tTitle = {Transform {A}nalysis and {A}sset {P}ricing for {A}ffine {J}ump-{D}iffusions},\n\tVolume = {68},\n\tNumber = {6},\n\tdoi = {10.3386/w7105},\n\tYear = {2000}}\n\n@misc{EIOPA2009,\n\ttitle={{Solvency {II} {D}irective ({D}irective 2009/138/{EC})}},\n\tshortauthor={EIOPA},\n\tauthor={{European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority}},\n\tyear={2009},\n\thowpublished={\\url{https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009L0138-20140523&from=EN}}}\n\n@misc{EIOPA2015,\n\ttitle={{Commission {D}elegated {R}egulation ({EU}) 2015/35 of 10 {O}ctober 2014 supplementing {D}irective 2009/138/{EC} of the {E}uropean {P}arliament and of the {C}ouncil on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of {I}nsurance and {R}einsurance ({S}olvency {II})}},\n\tshortauthor={EIOPA},\n\tauthor={{European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority}},\n\tyear={2015},\n\thowpublished={\\url{https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:2015:012:FULL&from=EN}}}\n\n@article{FaldenNyegaard2021,\ntitle={Retrospective {R}eserves and {B}onus with {P}olicyholder {B}ehavior},\njournal={Risks},\nvolume={9},\nDOI={10.3390/risks9010015},\nauthor={D. Falden and A.K. Nyegaard},\nyear={2021},\npages={28}}\n\n@article{Furrer2019,\nauthor = {C. Furrer},\ntitle = {{Experience rating in the classic Markov chain life insurance setting: An empirical Bayes and multivariate frailty approach}},\njournal = {European Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {9},\npages = {31-58},\nyear = {2019},\ndoi = {10.1007/s13385-019-00190-5}}\n\n@phdthesis{Furrer2020,\n author = {C. Furrer},\n title = {Multi-state modeling in the mathematics of life insurance: meditations and applications},\n school = {University of Copenhagen},\n year = {2020}}\n\n@article{Furrer2022,\n title={Scaled insurance cash flows: representation and computation via change of measure techniques},\n author={C. Furrer},\n journal={Finance and Stochastics},\n volume={26},\n number={2},\n pages={359-382},\n doi={10.1007/s00780-022-00472-z},\n year={2022}}\n\n@article{FurrerSandqvist2025,\n title={Loss of earning capacity in Denmark--an actuarial perspective},\n author={C. Furrer and O.L. Sandqvist},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.11578},\n year={2025}}\n\n\n@inproceedings{FollmerSondermann1986,\n\ttitle={Hedging of {N}on-{R}edundant {C}ontingent {C}laims},\n\tDOI={10.13140/RG.2.1.3298.8322},\n\teditor={W. Hildenbrand and A. Mas-Colell},\n \tbooktitle={Contributions to Mathematical Economics},\n\tpublisher={Elsevier Science, North-Holland},\n\tauthor={H. F{\\\"o}llmer and D. Sondermann},\n\tyear={1986},\n \tpages={205-223}}\n\n@article{GadNielsen2016,\nauthor = {K.S.T. Gad and J.W. Nielsen},\ntitle = {Reserves and cash flows under stochastic retirement},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {2016},\nnumber = {10},\npages = {876-904},\nyear = {2016},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461238.2015.1028432}}\n\n@article{Gatzert2009,\nauthor={N. Gatzert},\ntitle={Implicit options in life insurance: An overview},\njournal={Zeitschrift f{\\\"u}r die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft},\nvolume={98},\nnumber={2},\npages={141-164},\nyear={2009},\ndoi={10.1007/s12297-008-0046-2}}\n\n@article{GerdsSchumacher2006,\nauthor = {T.A. Gerds and M. Schumacher},\ntitle = {Consistent {E}stimation of the {E}xpected {B}rier {S}core in {G}eneral {S}urvival {M}odels with {R}ight-{C}ensored {E}vent {T}imes},\njournal = {Biometrical Journal},\nvolume = {48},\nnumber = {6},\npages = {1029-1040},\ndoi = {10.1002/bimj.200610301},\nyear = {2006}}\n\n@article{GhitanyEtAl2012,\nauthor={M.E. Ghitany and D. Karlis and D.K. Mutairi and F.A. Al-Awadhi},\ntitle={An {EM} algorithm for multivariate mixed {P}oisson regression models and its application},\njournal={Applied Mathematical Sciences},\nvolume={6},\nnumber={137},\npages={6843-6856},\nyear={2012}}\n\n@article{GillJohansen1990,\nauthor = \"R.D. Gill and S. Johansen\",\ndoi = \"10.1214/aos/1176347865\",\njournal = \"Annals of Statistics\",\nnumber = \"4\",\npages = \"1501-1555\",\ntitle = \"A {S}urvey of {P}roduct-{I}ntegration with a {V}iew {T}oward {A}pplication in {S}urvival {A}nalysis\",\nvolume = \"18\",\nyear = \"1990\"}\n\n@article{GschlosslSchoenmaekersDenuit2011,\nauthor = {S. Gschl{\\\"o}ssl and P. Schoenmaekers and M. Denuit},\ntitle = {Risk classification in life insurance: methodology and case study},\njournal = {European Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {1},\npages = {23-41},\nyear = {2011},\ndoi = {10.1007/s13385-011-0028-y}}\n\n@article{Guasoni2002,\n\ttitle={Risk minimization under transaction costs},\n\tvolume={6},\n\tdoi={10.1007/s780-002-8402-0},\n\tjournal={Finance and Stochastics},\n\tauthor={P. Guasoni},\n\tyear={2002},\n\tpages={91-113}}\n\n@article{GuibertPlanchet2018,\n\ttitle={{Non-parametric inference of transition probabilities based on Aalen–Johansen integral estimators for acyclic multi-state models: application to LTC insurance}},\n\tvolume={82},\n\tdoi={10.1016/j.insmatheco.2018.05.004},\n\tjournal={Insurance: Mathematics and Economics},\n\tauthor={Q. Guibert and F. Planchet},\n\tyear={2018},\n\tpages={21-36}}\n\n@article{Haastrup2000,\nauthor = {S. Haastrup},\ntitle = {Comparison of {S}ome {B}ayesian {A}nalyses of {H}eterogeneity in {G}roup {L}ife {I}nsurance},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {2000},\npages = {2-16},\nyear = {2000},\ndoi = {10.1080/034612300750066692}}\n\n@article{HeathJarrowMorton1992,\n\tAuthor = {D. Heath and R. Jarrow and A. Morton},\n\tJournal = {Econometrica},\n\tPages = {77-106},\n\tTitle = {Bond {P}ricing and the {T}erm {S}tructure of {I}nterest {R}ates},\n\tVolume = {60},\n\tdoi = {10.2307/2951677},\n\tYear = {1992}}\n\n@phdthesis{Helwich2008,\n author = {M. Helwich},\n title = {Durational effects and non-smooth semi-{M}arkov models in life insurance},\n school = {University of Rostock},\n year = {2008}}\n\n@article{HenriksenNielsenSteffensenSvensson2014,\nauthor = {L.F.B Henriksen and J.W. Nielsen and M. Steffensen and C. Svensson},\ntitle = {Markov chain modeling of policyholder behavior in life insurance and pension},\njournal = {European Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {4},\npages = {1-29},\nyear = {2014},\ndoi = {10.1007/s13385-014-0091-2}}\n\n@phdthesis{Henriksen2014,\n\tTitle = {Aspects of valuation and optimization in life insurance},\n\tSchool = {University of Copenhagen},\n\tAuthor = {L.F.B. Henriksen},\n\tYear = {2014},\n\turl = {http://web.math.ku.dk/noter/filer/phd14lfbh.pdf}}\n\n@article{Hoem1969,\nauthor = {J.M. Hoem},\ntitle = {Markov Chain Models in Life Insurance},\njournal = {Bl{\\\"a}tter der DGVFM},\nvolume = {9},\npages = {91-107},\nyear = {1969},\ndoi = {10.1007/BF02810082}}\n\n@incollection{Hoem1972,\ntitle = \"Inhomogeneous Semi-Markov Processes, Select Actuarial Tables, and Duration-Dependence in Demography\",\neditor = \"T.N.E. Greville\",\nbooktitle = \"Population Dynamics\",\npublisher = \"Academic Press\",\npages = \"251-296\",\nyear = \"1972\",\ndoi = \"10.1016/B978-1-4832-2868-6.50013-8\",\nauthor = \"J.M. Hoem\"}\n\n@inproceedings{Hoem1988,\nauthor = {J.M. Hoem},\ntitle = {{The versatility of the Markov chain as a tool in the mathematics of life insurance}},\nbooktitle = {Transactions of the 23rd International Congress of Actuaries},\nyear = {1988},\npages = {171-202},\naddress = {Helsinki, Finland}}\n\n@article{HoemAalen1978,\nauthor = {J.M. Hoem and O.O. Aalen},\ntitle = {Actuarial values of payment streams},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {1978},\npages = {38-47},\nyear = {1978},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461238.1978.10414317}}\n\n@book{Hougaard2000,\n\tAuthor = {P. Hougaard},\n\tTitle = {Analysis of {M}ultivariate {S}urvival {D}ata},\n\tPublisher = {Springer, New York},\n\tSeries = {Statistics for Biology and Health},\n\tdoi\t= {10.1007/978-1-4612-1304-8},\n\tYear = {2000}}\n\n@misc{IFRS17,\n\ttitle={{{IFRS} 17 {I}nsurance {C}ontracts}},\n\tshortauthor={IFRS},\n\tauthor={{International Accounting Standards Board}},\n\tyear={2017},\n\thowpublished={\\url{https://www.idc.ac.il/he/specialprograms/accounting/fvf/Documents/IFRS17/WEBSITE155.pdf}}}\n\n@book{Jacobsen1982,\n\tAuthor = {M. Jacobsen},\n\tTitle = {Statistical {A}nalysis of {C}ounting {P}rocesses},\n\tPublisher = {Springer, New York},\n\tSeries = {Lecture Notes in Statistics},\n\tdoi\t= {10.1007/978-1-4684-6275-3},\n\tYear = {1982}}\n\n@book{Jacobsen2006,\n\tAuthor = {M. Jacobsen},\n\tTitle = {Point process theory and applications: {M}arked point and piecewise deterministic processes},\n\tPublisher = {Birkh{\\\"a}user, Boston},\n\tSeries = {Probability and its Applications},\n\tdoi\t= {10.1007/0-8176-4463-6},\n\tYear = {2006}}\n\n@article{Jacod1975,\nauthor = {J. Jacod},\ntitle = {Multivariate point processes: predictable projection, {R}adon-{N}ikodym derivatives, representation of martingales},\njournal = {Zeitschrift f{\\\"u}r {W}ahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und {V}erwandte {G}ebiete},\nvolume = {31},\npages = {235-253},\ndoi = {10.1007/BF00536010},\nyear = {1975}}\n\n@book{JacodShiryaev2003,\n\tAuthor = {J. Jacod and A.N. Shiryaev},\n\tTitle = {Limit {T}heorems for {S}tochastic {P}rocesses},\n\tPublisher = {Springe, Berlin, Heidelberg},\n\tSeries = {Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften},\n\tEdition\t= {2},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/978-3-662-05265-5},\n\tYear = {2003}}\n\n@article{Janssen1966,\nauthor = {J. Janssen},\ntitle = {Application des processus semi-markoviens à un problème d’invaliditè},\njournal = {Bulletin de l’Association Royale des Actuaires Belges},\nvolume = {63},\npages = {35-52},\nyear = {1966}}\n\n@article{JarnerMoller2015,\nauthor = {S.F. Jarner and T. M{\\o}ller},\ntitle = {A partial internal model for longevity risk},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {2015},\nnumber = {4},\npages = {352-382},\nyear = {2015},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461238.2013.836561}}\n\n@article{JensenSchomacker2015,\ntitle={A {T}wo-{A}ccount {L}ife {I}nsurance {M}odel for {S}cenario-{B}ased {V}aluation {I}ncluding {E}vent {R}isk},\nvolume={3},\nDOI={10.3390/risks3020183},\nnumber={2},\njournal={Risks},\nauthor={N. Jensen and K. Schomacker},\nyear={2015},\npages={183-218}}\n\n@article{Jensen2016,\ntitle={Scenario-based life insurance prognoses in a multi-state {M}arkov model},\nvolume={6},\ndoi={10.1007/s13385-016-0137-8},\njournal={European Actuarial Journal},\nauthor={N.R. Jensen},\nyear={2016},\npages={307-330}}\n\n@book{Kallenberg2021,\n\tAuthor = {O. Kallenberg},\n\tTitle = {Foundations of {M}odern {P}robability},\n\tPublisher = {Springer, Cham},\n\tSeries = {Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling},\n\tedition = {3},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/978-3-030-61871-1},\n\tYear = {2021}}\n\n@manual{KlugmanEtAl2009,\n\tAuthor = {S. Klugman and T. Rhodes and M. Purushotham and S. Gill and {MIB Solutions}},\n\tTitle = {Credibility {T}heory {P}ractices},\n\tYear = {2009},\n\tOrganization = {Society of Actuaries}}\n\n@article{KraftSteffensen2007,\n\tAuthor = {H. Kraft and M. Steffensen},\n\tJournal = {Review of Finance},\n\tPages = {209-252},\n\tTitle = {Bankruptcy, {C}ounterparty {R}isk, and {C}ontagion},\n\tVolume = {11},\n\tdoi = {10.1093/rof/rfm002},\n\tYear = {2007}}\n\n@article{LambertonPhamSchweizer1998,\n\ttitle={Local {R}isk-{M}inimization under {T}ransaction {C}osts},\n\tvolume={23},\n\tdoi={10.1287/moor.23.3.585},\n\tnumber={3},\n\tjournal={Mathematics of Operations Research},\n\tauthor={D. Lamberton and H. Pham and M. Schweizer},\n\tyear={1998},\n\tpages={585-612}}\n\n@book{LastBrandt1995,\n\tAuthor = {G. Last and A. Brandt},\n\tTitle = {Marked {P}oint {P}rocesses on the {R}eal {L}ine},\n\tPublisher = {Springer, New York},\n\tSeries = {Probability and Its Applications},\n\tYear = {1995}}\n\n@article{LeeCarter1992,\n URL = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2290201},\n author = {R.D. Lee and L.R. Carter},\n journal = {Journal of the American Statistical Association},\n number = {419},\n pages = {659-671},\n title = {Modeling and {F}orecasting {U.S}. {M}ortality},\n volume = {87},\n doi = {10.2307/2290201},\n year = {1992}}\n\n@article{LeeNelder1996,\n author = {Y. Lee and J.A. Nelder},\n journal = {Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological)},\n number = {4},\n pages = {619-678},\n title = {Hierarchical {G}eneralized {L}inear {M}odels},\n volume = {58},\n year = {1996},\n doi={10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02105.x}}\n\n@article{LewisShedler1979,\nauthor = {P.A. Lewis and G.S. Shedler},\ntitle = {Simulation of nonhomogeneous poisson processes by thinning},\njournal = {Naval Research Logistics Quarterly},\nvolume = {26},\nnumber = {3},\npages = {403-413},\ndoi = {10.1002/nav.3800260304},\nyear = {1979}}\n\n@article{Lidstone1905,\nauthor = {G.J. Lidstone},\ntitle = {Changes in pure premium values consequent upon variations in the rate\nof interest or rate of mortality},\njournal = {Journal of the Institute of Actuaries},\nvolume = {3},\nyear = {1905}}\n\n@article{Linnemann1993,\ntitle = \"On the application of {T}hiele's differential equation in life insurance\",\njournal = \"Insurance: Mathematics and Economics\",\nvolume = \"13\",\npages = \"63-74\",\nyear = \"1993\",\ndoi = \"10.1016/0167-6687(93)90536-X\",\nauthor = \"P. Linnemann\"}\n\n@article{LintonNielsen1995,\n title={A kernel method of estimating structured nonparametric regression based on marginal integration},\n author={Linton, Oliver and Nielsen, Jens Perch},\n journal={Biometrika},\n pages={93--100},\n year={1995},\n publisher={JSTOR}\n}\n\n@article{Maltzahn2021,\nauthor = {N. Maltzhan and R. Hoff and O.O. Aalen and I.S. Mehlum and H. Putter and J.M. Gran},\ntitle = {A hybrid landmark {Aalen}--{Johansen} estimator for transition probabilities in partially non-{Markov} multi-state models},\njournal = {Lifetime Data Analysis},\nvolume = {27},\nnumber = {4},\npages = {737-760},\ndoi = {10.1007/s10985-021-09534-4},\nyear = {2021}}\n\n@book{MilbrodtHelbig2008,\ntitle = {{Mathematische Methoden der Personenversicherung}},\nauthor = {H. Milbrodt and M. Helbig},\npublisher = {De Gruyter},\naddress = {Berlin, New York},\ndoi = {10.1515/9783110197952},\nisbn = {9783110197952},\nyear = {2008}}\n\n@article{MilbrodtStracke1997,\ntitle = \"Markov models and {T}hiele's integral equations for the prospective reserve\",\njournal = \"Insurance: Mathematics and Economics\",\nvolume = \"19\",\nnumber = \"3\",\npages = \"187-235\",\nyear = \"1997\",\ndoi = \"10.1016/S0167-6687(97)00020-6\",\nauthor = \"H. Milbrodt and A. Stracke\"}\n\n@article{MilevskyPromislow2001,\n\tAuthor = {M. Milevsky and D. Promislow},\n\tJournal = {Insurance: Mathematics and Economics},\n\tPages = {299-318},\n\tTitle = {Mortality derivatives and the option to annuitise},\n\tVolume = {29},\n\tNumber = {3},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/S0167-6687(01)00093-2},\n\tYear = {2001}}\n\n@Unpublished{MiltersenPersson2005,\ntitle={Is mortality dead? {S}tochastic forward force of mortality rate determined by no arbitrage},\nauthor={K. Miltersen and S. Persson},\nyear={2005},\nurl={http://www.mathematik.uni-ulm.de/carfi/vortraege/downloads/DeadMort.pdf},\nnote={Working paper, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration}}\n\n@book{MilbrodtRoehra2016,\n title={Aktuarielle Methoden der deutschen Privaten Krankenversicherung},\n author={Hartmut Milbrodt and Volker R{\\\"o}hrs},\n volume={34},\n year={2016},\n publisher={VVW GmbH}}\n\n@article{MilhaudDutang2018,\n\ttitle={Lapse tables for lapse risk management in insurance: a competing risk approach},\n\tauthor={X. Milhaud and C. Dutang},\n\tjournal={European Actuarial Journal},\n\tvolume={8},\n\tnumber={1},\n\tpages={97-126},\n\tyear={2018},\n\tpublisher={Springer}}\n\n@article{Moller1993,\nauthor = {C.M. M{\\o}ller},\ntitle = {A stochastic version of Thiele's differential equation},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {1993},\npages = {1-16},\nyear = {1993},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461238.1993.10413910}}\n\n@article{Moller1998,\n\ttitle={Risk-minimizing hedging strategies for unit-linked life insurance contracts}, \n\tvolume={28},\n\tdoi={10.2143/AST.28.1.519077},\n\tjournal={ASTIN Bulletin},\n\tauthor={T. M{\\o}ller},\n\tyear={1998},\n\tpages={17-47}}\n\n@article{Moller2001,\n\ttitle={Risk-minimizing hedging strategies for insurance payment processes}, \n\tvolume={5},\n\tdoi={10.1007/s007800100041},\n\tjournal={Finance and Stochastics},\n\tnumber={4},\n\tauthor={T. M{\\o}ller},\n\tyear={2001},\n\tpages={419-446}}\n\n@article{Moller2002,\nauthor={T. M{\\o}ller},\ntitle={On {V}aluation and {R}isk {M}anagement at the {I}nterface of {I}nsurance and {F}inance},\nvolume={8},\ndoi={10.1017/S1357321700003913},\nnumber={4},\njournal={British Actuarial Journal},\nyear={2002},\npages={787-827}}\n\n@book{MollerSteffensen2007,\nauthor={T. M{\\o}ller and M. Steffensen},\nseries={International Series on Actuarial Science},\ntitle={Market-{V}aluation {M}ethods in {L}ife and {P}ension {I}nsurance},\ndoi={10.1017/CBO9780511543289},\npublisher={Cambridge University Press, Cambridge},\nyear={2007}}\n\n@book{Neveu1965,\nauthor={J. Neveu},\nseries={Holden-Day Series in Probability and Statistics},\ntitle={{Mathematical Foundations of the Calculus of Probability}},\npublisher={Holden-Day, California},\nyear={1965}}\n\n@article{Niemeyer2015,\n title={{Safety margins for systematic biometric and financial risk in a semi-Markov life insurance framework}},\n author={A. Niemeyer},\n journal={Risks},\n volume={3},\n pages={35-60},\n year={2015},\n doi={10.3390/risks3010035}}\n\n@article{Niessl2023,\n title={{Statistical inference for state occupation and transition probabilities in non-Markov multi-state models subject to both random left-truncation and right-censoring}},\n author={A. Nie{\\ss}l and A. Allignol and J. Beyersmann and C. Mueller},\n journal={Econometrics and Statistics},\n volume={25},\n pages={110-124},\n year={2023},\n doi={10.1016/j.ecosta.2021.09.008}}\n\n@article{Norberg1985,\nauthor = {R. Norberg},\ntitle = {Lidstone in the continuous case},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {1985},\npages = {27-34},\nyear = {1985},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461238.1985.10413775}}\n\n@article{Norberg1989a,\nauthor = {R. Norberg},\ntitle = {A {C}lass of {C}onjugate {H}ierarchical {P}riors for {G}ammoid {L}ikelihoods},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {1989},\nnumber = {4},\npages = {177-193},\nyear = {1989},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461238.1989.10557353}}\n\n@article{Norberg1989b,\nauthor = {R. Norberg},\ntitle = {Experience {R}ating in {G}roup {L}ife {I}nsurance},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {1989},\nnumber = {4},\npages = {194-224},\nyear = {1989},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461238.1989.10557354}}\n\n@article{Norberg1990,\nauthor = {R. Norberg},\ntitle = {Payment {M}easures, {I}nterest, and {D}iscounting},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {1990},\npages = {14-33},\nyear = {1990},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461238.1990.10413870}}\n\n@article{Norberg1991,\nauthor = {R. Norberg},\ntitle = {Reserves in Life and Pension Insurance},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {1991},\npages = {3-24},\nyear = {1991},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461238.1991.10557357}}\n\n@article{Norberg1992,\nauthor = {R. Norberg},\ntitle = {{Hattendorff's theorem and Thiele's differential equation generalized}},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {1992},\npages = {2-14},\nyear = {1992},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461238.1992.10413894}}\n\n@article{Norberg1995,\nauthor = {R. Norberg},\ntitle = {A time-continuous {M}arkov chain interest model with applications to insurance},\njournal = {Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis},\nvolume = {11},\nnumber = {3},\npages = {245-256},\ndoi = {10.1002/asm.3150110306},\nyear = {1995}}\n\n@article{Norberg1996,\nauthor = {R. Norberg},\ntitle = {{Addendum to Hattendorff's Theorem and Thiele's Differential Equation Generalized, SAJ 1992, 2--14}},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {1996},\npages = {50-53},\nyear = {1996},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461238.1996.10413962}}\n\n@article{Norberg1999,\nauthor = {R. Norberg},\ntitle = {A theory of bonus in life insurance},\njournal = {Finance and Stochastics},\nvolume = {3},\npages = {373-390},\nyear = {1999},\ndoi = {10.1007/s007800050067}}\n\n@article{Norberg2001,\nauthor = {R. Norberg},\ntitle = {On Bonus and Bonus Prognoses in Life Insurance},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {2001},\nnumber = {2},\npages = {126-147},\nyear = {2001},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461230152592773}}\n\n@article{Norberg2010,\n\tAuthor = {R. Norberg},\n\tJournal = {Insurance: Mathematics and Economics},\n\tPages = {105-112},\n\tTitle = {Forward mortality and other vital rates -- {A}re they the way forward?},\n\tVolume = {47},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.insmatheco.2010.07.002},\n\tYear = {2010}}\n\n@article{Norberg2013,\nauthor = {R. Norberg},\ntitle = {Optimal hedging of demographic risk in life insurance},\njournal = {Finance and Stochastics},\nvolume = {17},\npages = {197–222},\nyear = {2013},\ndoi = {10.1007/s00780-012-0182-3}}\n\n@misc{OECD2015,\n\ttitle={Stocktaking of the tax treatment of funded private pension plans in {OECD} and {EU} countries {(OECD)}},\n\tshortauthor={OECD},\n\tauthor={{Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development}},\n\tyear={2015},\n\thowpublished={\\url{https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-treatment-funded-private-pension-plans-oecd-eu-countries.htm}}\n}\n\n@misc{Overgaard2019a,\n title={Counting processes in $p$-variation with applications to recurrent events}, \n author={M. Overgaard},\n year={2019},\n note={arXiv:1903.04296}\n}\n\n@article{Overgaard2019b,\nauthor = {M. Overgaard},\ntitle = {State {O}ccupation {P}robabilities in {N}on-{Markov} {M}odels},\njournal = {Mathematical Methods of Statistics},\nvolume = {28},\nnumber = {4},\npages = {279-290},\nyear = {2019},\ndoi = {10.3103/S1066530719040033}}\n\n@article{OtterlooGarcia2022,\nauthor = {S. de Mol van Otterloo and J. Alonso-Garc\\'{i}a},\ntitle = {A multi-state model for sick leave and its impact on partial early retirement incentives: the case of the {N}etherlands},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\npages = {1-25},\nyear = {2022},\nnote = {To appear},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461238.2022.2092891}}\n\n@article{PerkowskiRuf2015,\nauthor = \"N. Perkowski and J. Ruf\",\ndoi = \"10.1214/14-AOP956\",\njournal = \"Annals of Probability\",\nnumber = \"6\",\npages = \"3133-3176\",\ntitle = \"Supermartingales as {R}adon–{N}ikodym densities and related measure extensions\",\nvolume = \"43\",\nyear = \"2015\"}\n\n@article{PutterSpitoni2018,\nauthor = {H. Putter and C. Spitoni},\ntitle ={Non-parametric estimation of transition probabilities in non-{Markov} multi-state models: The landmark {Aalen–Johansen} estimator},\njournal = {Statistical Methods in Medical Research},\nvolume = {27},\nnumber = {7},\npages = {2081-2092},\nyear = {2018},\ndoi = {10.1177/0962280216674497}}\n\n@article{RamlauHansen1988,\n title={Smoothing counting process intensities by means of kernel functions},\n author={Ramlau-Hansen, Henrik},\n journal={The Annals of Statistics},\n pages={453--466},\n year={1983},\n publisher={JSTOR}\n}\n\n\n@article{RamlauHansen1988a,\ntitle = \"The emergence of profit in life insurance\",\njournal = \"Insurance: Mathematics and Economics\",\nvolume = \"7\",\nnumber = \"4\",\npages = \"225-236\",\nyear = \"1988\",\ndoi = \"10.1016/0167-6687(88)90080-7\",\nauthor = \"H. Ramlau-Hansen\"}\n\n@article{Ramlau1991,\ntitle={Distribution of {S}urplus in {L}ife {I}nsurance},\nvolume={21},\ndoi={10.2143/AST.21.1.2005401},\njournal={ASTIN Bulletin},\nauthor={H. Ramlau-Hansen},\nyear={1991},\npages={57–71}}\n\n@Article{ReckSchuppReuss2025,\nAUTHOR = {L. Reck and J. Schupp and A. Reu\\ss},\nTITLE = {A Multistate Analysis of Policyholder Behaviour in Life Insurance—Lasso-Based Modelling Approaches},\nJOURNAL = {Risks},\nVOLUME = {13},\nYEAR = {2025},\nNUMBER = {4},\nARTICLE-NUMBER = {73},\nDOI = {10.3390/risks13040073}}\n\n@article{Schweizer1994,\n\ttitle={Risk-{M}inimizing {H}edging {S}trategies under {R}estricted {I}nformation},\n\tvolume={4},\n\tdoi={10.1111/j.1467-9965.1994.tb00062.x},\n\tjournal={Mathematical Finance},\n\tnumber={4},\n\tauthor={M. Schweizer},\n\tyear={1994},\n\tpages={327-342}}\n\n@Inproceedings{Schweizer2001,\n\ttitle={A {G}uided {T}our through {Q}uadratic {H}edging {A}pproaches},\n\tdoi={10.1017/CBO9780511569708.016},\n\teditor={E. Jouini and J. Cvitani{\\'c} and M. Musiela},\n \tbooktitle={Option Pricing, Interest Rates and Risk Management},\n \taddress={Cambridge University Press},\n\tauthor={M. Schweizer},\n\tyear={2001},\n \tpages={538-574}}\n \t \t\n@article{Schweizer2008,\n\ttitle={Local risk-minimization for multidimensional assets and payment streams},\n\tvolume={83},\n\tdoi={10.4064/bc83-0-13},\n\tjournal={Banach Center Publications},\n\tauthor={M. Schweizer},\n\tyear={2008},\n\tpages={213-229}}\n\n@article{Serfozo1971,\n author = {R.F. Serfozo},\n journal = {SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics},\n number = {3},\n pages = {530-535},\n title = {Functions of Semi-Markov Processes},\n volume = {20},\n year = {1971},\n doi = {10.1137/0120055}}\n\n@misc{Sokol2015,\n title={Revisiting the forward equations for inhomogeneous semi-{M}arkov processes},\n author={A. Sokol},\n year={2015},\n eprint={1504.02955},\n archivePrefix={arXiv}}\n\n@article{Steffensen2000,\ntitle = \"A no arbitrage approach to {T}hiele's differential equation\",\njournal = \"Insurance: Mathematics and Economics\",\nvolume = \"27\",\nnumber = \"2\",\npages = \"201-214\",\nyear = \"2000\",\ndoi = \"10.1016/S0167-6687(00)00048-2\",\nauthor = \"M. Steffensen\"}\n\n@article{Steffensen2006,\nauthor = {M. Steffensen},\ntitle = {Surplus-linked life insurance},\njournal = {Scandinavian Actuarial Journal},\nvolume = {2006},\npages = {1-22},\nyear = {2006},\ndoi = {10.1080/03461230500199533}}\n\n@article{VaupelMantonStallard1979,\nauthor={J.W. Vaupel and K.G. Manton and E. Stallard},\ntitle={ The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality},\njournal={Demography},\nvolume={16},\npages={439-454},\nyear={1979},\ndoi={10.2307/2061224}}\n\n@article{Wong1986,\nauthor = \"W. H. Wong\",\ndoi = \"10.1214/aos/1176349844\",\njournal = \"Annals of Statistics\",\npages = \"88-123\",\ntitle = \"{T}heory of {P}artial {L}ikelihood\",\nvolume = \"14\",\nyear = \"1986\"}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: final.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[11pt]{article}\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}\n\\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\\usepackage{lmodern}\n\\usepackage[margin=1.3in]{geometry}\n\\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm,amsfonts,mathtools}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{tikz}\n\\usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta,positioning,calc}\n\\usepackage{enumitem}\n\\usepackage[colorlinks=true,linkcolor=blue,citecolor=blue,urlcolor=blue]{hyperref}\n\\usepackage{dsfont}\n\\usepackage{natbib}\n\n\\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]\n\\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}\n\\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}\n\\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}\n\\newtheorem{assumption}[theorem]{Assumption}\n\\theoremstyle{definition}\n\\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}\n\\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}\n\\newtheorem{numericexample}[theorem]{Numerical Example}\n\\theoremstyle{remark}\n\\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}\n\n\\newcommand{\\E}{\\mathbb{E}}\n\\newcommand{\\Prob}{\\mathbb{P}}\n\\newcommand{\\1}{{1}}\n\\newcommand{\\dd}{\\mathrm{d}}\n\\newcommand{\\R}{\\mathbb{R}}\n\\newcommand{\\given}{\\,\\vert\\,}\n\\newcommand{\\Z}{\\mathcal{Z}}\n\\newcommand{\\Xset}{\\mathcal{X}}\n\\newcommand{\\Sset}{\\mathcal{S}}\n\\newcommand{\\as}{\\xrightarrow{\\mathrm{a.s.}}}\n\\newcommand{\\pr}{\\xrightarrow{\\Prob}}\n\\newcommand{\\dist}{\\xrightarrow{\\mathcal{D}}}\n\\newcommand{\\indep}{\\mathrel{\\perp\\!\\!\\!\\perp}}\n\n\\title{Payment Process Estimation in Aggregated Insurance Models}\n\n\\author{\nMartin Bladt$^{1}$ \\and\nMarcus Christiansen$^{2}$\n}\n\n\\date{\n\\small\n$^{1}$ Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen \\\\\n$^{2}$ Institute of Mathematics, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg\n}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\\maketitle\n\n\\begin{abstract}\nInsurance payments may depend on latent micro states although only macro states and realized payments are observed. We study a sojourn-payment model for such aggregated multi-state systems under left-truncation and right-censoring. Starting from a micro-to-macro projection, we establish strong consistency and weak convergence for inverse-probability-weighted estimators of state-specific cumulative payment processes. \n\\end{abstract}\n\n%\\tableofcontents\n\\section{Introduction}\\label{sec:intro}\n\nIn life and health insurance, it is common to explain the individual insurance payments from a multistate model for the insured. In simple life insurances, the multistate model can fully explain the insurance benefits, so it suffices to statistically estimate this multistate model only. However, if disability benefits or sickness benefits are covered, or even medical bills are paid by the insurer, then fully explanatory multistate models can be so highly complex that their statistical estimation is unfeasible. In this case, aggregated insurance models are commonly used, which distinguish only a reduced set of macro states and average over the micro states. \n\nFor example, consider German private health insurance policies, which are long-term contracts calculated in a similar way to life insurance policies. The true insurance benefits depend on the huge number of different health states that the insured person may experience, so it is extremely challenging to statistically estimate the micro-level transition rates. Instead, insurers only distinguish the macro states `active', `lapsed', and `dead', cf.~\\citet{MilbrodtRoehra2016}.\n\nA second example is disability protection, which, in many countries, is spread across several layers, including public benefits, occupational pension schemes and private insurance. The interplay between the various levels can be highly complex. This is why actuaries often aggregate different disability statuses into a single macro state, avoiding micro-level modelling. See, for example, \\citet{FurrerSandqvist2025} for the situation in Denmark.\n\nIf the macro-level model does not fully explain the insurance payments process and the micro-level model is inaccessible, the aggregated insurance payment functions must be estimated directly from the data. This paper introduces a general framework for this statistical task and establishes the desirable asymptotic properties of the estimators. The combination of micro-level dependent insurance payments and the unavailability of transition rates at the micro-level has not yet been adequately addressed in the existing literature.\n\n\\citet{AhmadBladtFurrer2023} and \\citet{AhmadBladt2024} examine aggregated life insurance models in terms of the potential loss of the Markov property when switching from the micro- to the macro-level, in situations where the payment process depends solely on the macro states. \\citet{Andersen2024} study payment processes that depend on the micro states, focusing on the computational efficiency of the calculation and assuming that the transition rates at the micro-level are known.\nMicro-level modelling can be driven not only by the insured person’s health conditions, but also by the behaviour of the policyholder, cf.~\\citet{MilhaudDutang2018}. \\citet{ReckSchuppReuss2025} investigate algorithms for the efficient aggregation of behaviour-dependent micro-levels, discussing the transition rates but not the payment processes.\n\nThis paper focuses on payment processes involving sojourn payments only. This reflects the structure of our real-life examples and simplifies the statistical problem. Future research should also consider transition payments. From a mathematical point of view, the empirical process techniques of~\\citet{BladtFurrer2025} are the main tools upon which we base our analysis. Earlier related work in survival analysis is vast, and we confine ourselves to highlight \\citet{RamlauHansen1988} and \\citet{LintonNielsen1995} for intensity estimation, and the general treatment of counting processes in~\\citet{AndersenBorganGillKeiding2012}; the former references offer a promising route when considering the extension to more general payment processes.\n\nThe paper is structured as follows:\nIn Section \\ref{sec:setup}, we introduce the modeling framework for micro-level payment processes and prove the existence of unique projections to the macro-level. Section \\ref{sec:unconditional_framework} adds delayed entry and right-censoring to the payment processes. In Section \\ref{sec:estimators} we introduce estimators for the macro level payment functions. We prove strong consistency in section \\ref{subsec:strong_con} and asymptotic normality in section \\ref{subsec:weak_markov} under reasonable technical assumptions. Section \\ref{sec:numerical_examples} provides a numerical example.\n\n\n\t\n\n\\section{Micro-level payment processes and macro-level projection}\\label{sec:setup}\n\nInsurance payments may depend on features finer than the contractual states used for premium calculation and reporting. \nWe model this by separating latent micro states from observed macro states and then projecting the payment mechanism to macro level.\nThus, consider an individual insurance policy governed by a c\\`adl\\`ag jump process\n\\begin{align*}\nZ=(X,S),\\quad Z(t)\\in\\Z:=\\Xset\\times\\Sset,\n\\end{align*}\non a finite state space. Here $X$ represents macro states and $S$ represents micro states. We assume that $Z(0-)=Z(0)$. \n\nWe consider insurance payment processes on a finite time interval $[0,T]$. \nWe assume that the actual payments between the insurer and the policyholder can be described by a payment process $A$ on $[0,T]$ of the form\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:A_decomp}\nA(t)\n=\n\\sum_{(i,e)\\in\\Z} \\int_{[0,t]} \\1_{\\{Z(s-)=(i,e)\\}}\\,\\dd A_{(i,e)}(s)\n\\end{equation}\nwith right-continuous functions $A_{(i,e)}$ of finite variation. Thus, payments only accumulate while the policy remains in a micro state. This is the setting studied throughout the paper. Our assumptions imply that $A$ has càdlàg paths of finite variation.\n\nSince we focus on applications in which micro-level modeling is not really feasible, we are looking for a suitable projection of $A$ onto a macro-level process $B$ of the form\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:B_decomp}\n B(t)\n=\n\\sum_{i\\in\\Xset}\\int_{[0,t]} \\1_{\\{X(s-)=i\\}}\\,\\dd B_i(s)\n\\end{equation}\nwith right-continuous functions $B_i$ of finite variation. \n\nThe following theorem shows that a suitable projection exists and is almost surely unique. The theorem needs the state-specific mean cumulative payment functions\n\\begin{align}\n\tG_i(t)&:=\\E\\left[\\int_{[0,t]}\\1_{\\{X(s-)=i\\}}\\dd A(s)\\right]\n\t\\label{eq:uncens_payments}\n\\end{align}\nand the state occupation probabilities\n\\begin{align}\n\tW_i(t)&:=\\E\\left[\\1_{\\{X(t)=i\\}}\\right].\n\t\\label{eq:uncens_stateoccupprob}\n\\end{align}\n\n\\begin{theorem}[Projection and uniqueness]\\label{th:projection}\nThe macro-level payment process $B$ defined by \\eqref{eq:B_decomp} and by the right-continuous finite-variation functions\n\\begin{align}\\label{Bi_construction}\n\tB_i(t) = \\int_{[0,t]} \\frac{1}{W_i(s-)} G_i(\\dd s)\n\\end{align}\n satisfies the projection property \n \\begin{equation}\\label{eq:projection_condition}\n \t\\E\\bigg[ \\int_I\\1_{\\{X(s-)=i\\}}\\,\\dd A(s)\\bigg]\n \t=\n \t\\E\\bigg[\\int_I \\1_{\\{X(s-)=i\\}}\\,\\dd B(s)\\bigg]\n \\end{equation}\n for all intervals $I \\subset [0,T]$ and states $i \\in \\mathcal{X}$.\n \nIf $\\widetilde B$ is another macro payment process of the form \\eqref{eq:B_decomp} satisfying \\eqref{eq:projection_condition}, then $\\widetilde B=B$ on $[0,T]$ up to indistinguishability.\n\\end{theorem}\n%\n%\nThe projection property \\eqref{eq:projection_condition} is similar to the projection property of \n\\citet[Theorem 2]{Andersen2024}. We additionally show uniqueness and do not require Markovianity. However, unlike \\citet{Andersen2024}, we do not consider extended filtrations.\nThe nonnegative Lebesgue–Stieltjes integral in \\eqref{Bi_construction} uses the standard convention that $0/0 := 0$. This convention is used throughout the paper.\n\n\\begin{proof}\n\tUsing Fubini's theorem, the definition \\eqref{Bi_construction} can be equivalently written as \n\\begin{align}\\begin{split}\n\t\t\\label{ExplConstrOfB}\n\t\t B_{i}(t) &= \\sum_{e \\in \\mathcal{S}} \\int_{[0,t]} \\frac{ \\mathbb{E}[ \\1_{\\{Z(s-)=(i,e)\\}} ]}{\\sum_{e' \\in \\mathcal{S}} \\mathbb{E}[\\1_{\\{Z(s-)=(i,e')\\}} ]} \\dd A_{(i,e)}(s).\n\\end{split}\\end{align}\n Note that the non-negative numerator is always less than or equal to the non-negative denominator. This means that the functions $B_i$ inherit the finite-variation property of the functions $A_{(i,e)}$. In particular, the numerator is always zero when the denominator is zero, which ensures that the non-negative Lebesgue-Stieltjes integral in \\eqref{Bi_construction} is well-defined even when the denominator is zero.\n \n Applying Fubini's theorem, we get\n\\begin{align}\\begin{split}\\label{EquilityofEdBEdA}\n\t\\mathbb{E}[ \\1_{\\{X(t-)=i\\}} \\dd B (t) ]\n\t&= \\mathbb{E}[ \\1_{\\{X(t-)=i\\}}] \\dd B_i (t) \\\\\n\t& = \\sum_{e \\in \\mathcal{S}} \\mathbb{E}[ \\1_{\\{Z(t-)=(i,e)\\}} ] \\dd A_{(i,e)}(t)\\\\\n\t&=\\mathbb{E}[ \\1_{\\{X(t-)=i\\}} \\dd A (t) ],\n\\end{split}\\end{align}\nwhich confirms that \\eqref{ExplConstrOfB} satisfies the projection property \\eqref{eq:projection_condition}.\n\nSuppose that $\\tilde{B}$ is another macro-level payment process that satisfies \\eqref{eq:projection_condition}. \t \nThen, for \nany random time $\\tau:\\Omega \\rightarrow [0,T]$, it holds that \n\\begin{align*}\n\t\\E[ B(\\tau) ] &= \\E\\bigg[\\sum_{i\\in \\mathcal{X}} \\int_{[0,T]} \\1_{\\{\\tau \\geq t\\}} \\1_{\\{X(t-)=i\\} } \\dd B_i(t) \\bigg]\\\\\n\t&= \\sum_{i\\in \\mathcal{X}} \\int_{[0,T]} \\frac{\\E[ \\1_{\\{\\tau \\geq t\\}} \\1_{\\{X(t-)=i\\} }]}{\\E[ \\1_{\\{X(t-)=i\\} }]} \\E[ \\1_{\\{X(t-)=i\\} } \\dd B(t) ] \\\\\n\t&= \\sum_{i\\in \\mathcal{X}} \\int_{[0,T]} \\frac{\\E[ \\1_{\\{\\tau \\geq t\\}} \\1_{\\{X(t-)=i\\} }]}{\\E[ \\1_{\\{X(t-)=i\\} }]} \\E[ \\1_{\\{X(t-)=i\\} } \\dd \\tilde B(t) ] \\\\\n\t\t&= \\E[ \\tilde B(\\tau) ],\n\\end{align*}\nusing the convention $0/0:=0$.\nThis means that the right-continuous processes $B$ and $\\tilde B$ are almost surely equal.\n\\end{proof}\n%\n\\begin{remark}\n\tDifferent from \\eqref{eq:A_decomp}, \nin the insurance literature we also find sojourn payment processes on $[0,T]$ of the form \n\\begin{equation*}\\dd A(t)\n\t=\n\t\\sum_{(i,e)\\in\\Z}\\1_{\\{Z(t)=(i,e)\\}}\\,\\dd A_{(i,e)}(t).\n\\end{equation*}\nThe difference is here that the payment $\\dd A_{(i,e)}(t)$ is triggered by the event $\\{Z(t)=(i,e)\\}$ instead of $\\{Z(t-)=(i,e)\\}$. All the results in this paper can be transferred to this alternative setting. Throughout the paper, we would we need to replace $t-$ by $t$. \n\\end{remark}\n\nTheorem \\ref{th:projection} fixes the macro target induced by the micro model.\nThe next section adds delayed entry and right-censoring through an observation-window process.\n\n\\section{Limited observation window}\\label{sec:unconditional_framework}\n\n%This section adds delayed entry and right-censoring to the modeling framework. The quantities of interest to be estimated statistically are the state-specific cumulative payment functions $B_i$, $i \\in \\mathcal{X}$.\n\n%\\subsection{Observed paths and censoring}\\label{subsec:observed_paths}\n\n%Unconditional here means that no external covariates or landmark variables are introduced. All quantities are population averages over the full portfolio, and the only incompleteness is temporal.\n\nWe introduce a latent observation window $(L,R)$, where $L$ is a delayed entry time and $R$ represents right-censoring. We do not require direct observation of $R$ itself, it is enough that the observation windows is observed up to $R$ or termination of the insurance contract. \n\nThe following assumption isolates the observation window from the macro-level multistate process and the micro-level payment process. \n\n\\begin{assumption}[Independent observation window]\\label{ass:indep_censoring}\nLet $(L,R)$ be stochastically indepedent of $(X,A)$, and let $\\Prob( L < t \\leq R)>0$ for all $t \\in [0,T]$.\n\\end{assumption}\n\n%\n%\\subsection{Targets}\\label{subsec:targets}\n%\n%We first define the uncensored population targets and then their observed-window analogues.\n%\n%\n%Summing over $i$ yields the overall mean cumulative payment process\n%\\begin{align*}\n%\\sum_{i\\in\\Xset}G_i(t)=\\E[A(t)-A(0)].\n%\\end{align*}\nIn addition to \\eqref{eq:uncens_payments} and \\eqref{eq:uncens_stateoccupprob}, we define the censored means\n\\begin{align}\nG_i^{\\mathrm c}(t)&:=\\E\\left[\\int_{[0,t]}\\1_{\\{L < s \\leq R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(s-)=i\\}}\\dd A(s)\\right]\n\\label{eq:cens_payments}\n\\end{align}\nand\n\\begin{align}\n\tW^{\\mathrm c}_i(t)&:=\\E\\left[\\1_{\\{L \\leq t < R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(t)=i\\}}\\right].\n\t\\label{eq:cens_stateoccupprob}\n\\end{align}\nUnder Assumption~\\ref{ass:indep_censoring}, censored and uncensored payment means differ only by a predictable factor. This allows us to write the target \\eqref{Bi_construction} in terms of the censored means.\n\n\\begin{proposition}[Substitution formula]\\label{prop:alt_rep}\nUnder Assumption~\\ref{ass:indep_censoring}, it holds that\n\\begin{align}\n\\int_{[0,t]}\\frac{1}{W^{\\mathrm c}_i(s-)}G_i^{\\mathrm c}(\\dd s)&=\\int_{[0,t]}\\frac{1}{W_i(s-)}G_i(\\dd s).\n\\label{eq:G_relation}\n\\end{align}\n%\n%Consequently,\n%\\begin{align}\n%G_i(t)&=\\int_{(0,t]}\\frac{1}{W(s-)}\\,G_i^{\\mathrm c}(\\dd s),\n%\\label{eq:G_target_cens}\n%\\end{align}\n\\end{proposition}\n\\begin{proof}\nFix $t\\le T$, and let $\\Phi$ be a nonnegative random measure with $\\sigma(\\Phi)\\subseteq \\sigma(X,A)$ and $\\E[\\Phi([0,t])]<\\infty$. Then\n\\begin{align*}\n\\E\\left[\\int_{[0,t]}\\1_{\\{L < s \\leq R\\}}\\Phi(\\dd s)\\right]\n&=\\E\\left[\\E\\left[\\int_{[0,t]}\\1_{\\{L < s \\leq R\\}}\\Phi(\\dd s)\\bigg|X,A\\right]\\right] \\\\\n&=\n\\E\\left[\\int_{[0,t]}\\E\\left[\\1_{\\{L < s \\leq R\\}}\\given X,A\\right]\\Phi(\\dd s)\\right] \\\\\n&=\n\\E\\left[\\int_{[0,t]}\\E[\\1_{\\{L < s \\leq R\\}}]\\Phi(\\dd s)\\right],\n\\end{align*}\nwhere the second equality uses the conditional Tonelli theorem for nonnegative integrands, and the third uses the stochastic independence of $(L,R)$ and $(X,A)$. \nNow define the mean measure $\\nu_\\Phi(B):=\\E[\\Phi(B)]$. For nonnegative simple functions $f=\\sum_{m=1}^M a_m\\1_{B_m}$,\n\\begin{align*}\n\\E\\left[\\int_{[0,t]}f(s)\\,\\Phi(\\dd s)\\right]\n&=\n\\sum_{m=1}^M a_m\\,\\E[\\Phi(B_m)] \\\\\n&=\n\\sum_{m=1}^M a_m\\,\\nu_\\Phi(B_m) \\\\\n&=\n\\int_{[0,t]}f(s)\\,\\nu_\\Phi(\\dd s).\n\\end{align*}\nBy monotone convergence, this extends to all nonnegative measurable functions $f$. Taking $f(s)=\\E[\\1_{\\{L < s \\leq R\\}}] $ yields\n\\begin{align*}\n\\E\\left[\\int_{(0,t]}\\E[\\1_{\\{L < s \\leq R\\}}]\\Phi(\\dd s)\\right]\n=\n\\int_{(0,t]}\\E[\\1_{\\{L < s \\leq R\\}}]\\,\\nu_\\Phi(\\dd s)\n=\n\\int_{(0,t]}\\E[\\1_{\\{L < s \\leq R\\}}]\\,\\E[\\Phi(\\dd s)].\n\\end{align*}\nWe apply this with $\\Phi(\\dd s)=\\1_{\\{X(s-)=i\\}}\\dd A(s)$ to get\n\\begin{align*}\n\tG_i^{\\mathrm c} (\\dd s) = \\E[\\1_{\\{L < s \\leq R\\}}]\\, G_i (\\dd s).\n\\end{align*}\n The stochastic independence of $(L,R)$ and $(X,A)$ gives\n\\begin{align*}\n\tW_i^{\\mathrm c} (s-) = \\E[\\1_{\\{L < s \\leq R\\}}]\\, W_i(s-).\n\\end{align*}\nThe latter two equations yield \\eqref{eq:G_relation} since $\\E[\\1_{\\{L < s \\leq R\\}}]>0$ by \nAssumption \\ref{ass:indep_censoring}.\n\\end{proof}\n\nProposition~\\ref{prop:alt_rep} is the basis for estimation: the payment functions $B_i$, $i \\in \\mathcal{X}$, can be recovered from observable censored payment sums and censored state occupation counts.\n%\n%\\begin{remark}\n%The state-specific target $G_i$ is already a mean cumulative payment process. In particular, summing \\eqref{eq:G_target_cens} over $i$ yields an uncensored representation of the overall mean cumulative payment process as well.\\hfill\\qed\n%\\end{remark}\n%\nThe next section turns this identity into an estimator and studies its large-sample behavior.\n\n\\section{Estimators}\\label{sec:estimators}\n\n\nWe assume that we have a stochastically independent and identically distributed sample\n\\begin{align*}\n(X^p,A^p,L^p,R^p)_{p=1}^n.\n\\end{align*}\nThis is a probabilistic representation, not an observation requirement. The estimators below only use observable stopped portfolio summaries and state occupation counts. \n\nWe define the empirical analogues of the population objects from Section~\\ref{sec:unconditional_framework}:\n\\begin{align}\n\\mathbb W_i^{(n)}(t)\n&:=\\frac1n\\sum_{p=1}^n\\1_{\\{L^p \\leq t < R^p\\}}\\1_{\\{X^p(t)=i\\}},\n\\label{eq:W_emp}\n\\\\\n\\mathbb G_i^{(n)}(t)\n&:=\\frac1n\\sum_{p=1}^n\\int_{[0,t]}\\1_{\\{L^p < s \\leq R^p\\}}\\1_{\\{X^p(s-)=i\\}}\\dd A^p(s).\n\\label{eq:G_emp}\n\\end{align}\nBased on these, we define the estimator for the target:\n\\begin{align}\n\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}(t)\n&:=\\int_{[0,t]}\\frac{1}{\\mathbb W_i^{(n)}(s-)}\\,\\mathbb G_i^{(n)}(\\dd s).\n\\label{eq:BBhat}\n\\end{align}\n This is the direct empirical analogue of \\eqref{eq:G_relation}.\n%\n\nTo compute $\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}$, one does not need the full collection of individual payment paths or the latent right-censoring times $R^p$ themselves. For each time $t$, one must observe only the sums\n\\begin{align*}\n\\sum_{p=1}^n\\1_{\\{L^p < t \\leq R^p\\}} \\1_{\\{X^p(t-)=i\\}}\n\\end{align*}\nand \n\\begin{align*}\n\\sum_{p=1}^n\\int_{(0,t]}\\1_{\\{L^p < s \\leq R^p\\}}\\1_{\\{X^p(s-)=i\\}}\\dd A^p(s).\n\\end{align*}\nThese quantities are naturally available in insurance data systems. Therefore, the estimator \\eqref{eq:BBhat} is usually computable in insurance practice.\n\n%If only aggregated payments are observed and no corresponding exposure process is recorded, then the inverse-weighted estimator is not computable. For the total mean cumulative payment process, one may sum over $i$, in which case state labels are not needed. \n\nWe now introduce technical assumptions to ensure the estimators have desirable asymptotic properties.\n% To keep things simple, we assume from now on that the payment process $A$ is monotone. In practice, this can be achieved by modeling benefit payments and premium payments as separate processes.\n%\n\n\\begin{assumption}[Moment condition for payment process]\\label{ass:markov_moments}\n\t%The payment path $A$ is c\\`adl\\`ag and nondecreasing on $[0,T]$. \n\tFor some $\\delta>0$, let\n\t\\begin{align*}\n\t\t\\E\\bigg[\\bigg(\\int_{[0,T]} |\\dd A(u)| \\bigg)^{2+\\delta}\\bigg]<\\infty.\n\t\\end{align*}\n\\end{assumption}\n%\nNote that the integral in the latter assumption represents the total variation of $A$ on $[0,T]$. \nIf is $A$ monotone, then we can replace this integral simply by $|A(T)|$. \n\n\nFor all $i,j \\in \\mathcal{X}$ with $i \\neq j$, we define the counting processes\n\\begin{align*}\n\tN_{ij}(t):=\\sharp\\big\\{ s \\in (0,t]: X(s-)=i,\\ X(s)=j\\big\\},\n\\end{align*}\ngiving the number of jumps of $X$ from $i$ to $j$ on the time interval $(0,t]$. \n%\n\\begin{assumption}[Moment condition for macro-level transition counts]\\label{ass:boundforjumpcounter}\nFor all $i,j \\in \\mathcal{X}$ with $i\\neq j$, let\n$$\\E[N_{ij}(T)^2]<\\infty.$$\n\\end{assumption}\nFor the consistency result, first moments would suffice. We impose second moments already here because the same condition is needed for the weak-convergence arguments below.\n\n\n%\n\\begin{assumption}[Positivity]\\label{ass:markov_pos}\n\tFor each $i \\in \\mathcal{X}$, let $[\\alpha_i,\\beta_i]\\subset [0,T]$ be an interval such that\n\t\\begin{align*}\n\t\t\\inf_{t \\in [\\alpha_i,\\beta_i] }W_i^{\\mathrm c}(t)>0.\n\t\\end{align*}\n\\end{assumption}\nThis assumption specifies intervals on which inverse weighting is well-defined.\n\n\n\\section{Strong consistency of estimators}\\label{subsec:strong_con}\n\nWe now show strong consistency of the estimators $\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}$, $i \\in \\mathcal{X}$, on the intervals $[\\alpha_i,\\beta_i]$, $i \\in \\mathcal{X}$, from Assumption \\ref{ass:markov_pos}.\n\n\\begin{theorem}[Strong uniform consistency]\\label{th:strong_cons}\n\tUnder Assumptions~\\ref{ass:indep_censoring}, \\ref{ass:markov_moments}, \\ref{ass:boundforjumpcounter}, and~\\ref{ass:markov_pos},\n\t\\begin{align}\n\t\t\\sup_{t \\in [\\alpha_i,\\beta_i]}\\left|\n\t\t\\big(\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}(t)-\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}(\\alpha_i)\\big)\n\t\t-\\big(B_i(t)-B_i(\\alpha_i)\\big)\\right|\\as0.\n\t\t\\label{eq:cons_BB}\n\t\\end{align}\n\\end{theorem}\n\nBefore we proof this theorem, we show uniform convergence of the emprical processes $ \\mathbb G_i^{(n)}$ and $ \\mathbb W_i^{(n)}$.\n\n\n\\begin{proposition}[Uniform consistency of components]\\label{prop:comp_cons}\nUnder Assumptions~\\ref{ass:indep_censoring}, ~\\ref{ass:markov_moments}, and \\ref{ass:boundforjumpcounter},\n\\begin{align}\n\\sup_{0\\le t\\le T}\\big|\\mathbb G_i^{(n)}(t)-G_i^{\\mathrm c}(t)\\big|&\\as0,\n\\label{eq:G_cons}\n\\\\\n\\sup_{0\\le t\\le T}\\big|\\mathbb W_i^{(n)}(t)-W^{\\mathrm c}_i(t)\\big|&\\as0.\n\\label{eq:W_cons}\n\\end{align}\n\\end{proposition}\n%\n\\begin{proof}\nSince $A$ has càdlàg paths of finite variation, it can be decomposed into the difference of two monotone càdlàg processes. Based on this fact and the triangular inequality, it is sufficient to prove convergence for non-decreasing payment processes $A$ only.\n\n \nThe following key decomposition follows from counting the number of jumps into and out of state $i \\in \\mathcal{X}$ under left truncation and right censoring:\n\\begin{align}\n\\1_{\\{L\\le t< R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(t)=i\\}}\n&=\n\\1_{\\{L\\le t\\}}\\1_{\\{L<R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(L)=i\\}}\n-\\1_{\\{R\\le t\\}}\\1_{\\{L<R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(R\\wedge T)=i\\}}\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&\\quad\n+\\sum_{j:j\\neq i}\\int_{(0,t]}\\1_{\\{L<s\\le R\\}}\\,\\dd N_{ji}(s)\n-\\sum_{j:j\\neq i}\\int_{(0,t]}\\1_{\\{L<s\\le R\\}}\\,\\dd N_{ij}(s).\n\\label{eq:key_decomp}\n\\end{align}\nIndeed, if $t<L$, then both sides are zero. If $L\\le t<R$, then\n\\begin{align*}\n\\1_{\\{X(t)=i\\}}\n=\n\\1_{\\{X(L)=i\\}}\n+\\sum_{j:j\\neq i}\\int_{(L,t]}\\dd N_{ji}(s)\n-\\sum_{j:j\\neq i}\\int_{(L,t]}\\dd N_{ij}(s),\n\\end{align*}\nsince the state indicator can change only through jumps into and out of the state $i$. Multiplying by $\\1_{\\{L<R\\}}$ gives \\eqref{eq:key_decomp} on $[L,R)$. If $t\\ge R$, then the same identity evaluated at time $R\\wedge T$ shows that the right-hand side equals $\\1_{\\{L<R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(R\\wedge T)=i\\}}-\\1_{\\{L<R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(R\\wedge T)=i\\}}=0$, which matches the left-hand side.\n\nDefine the auxiliary empirical processes\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mathbb J_i^{(n)}(t)\n&:=\\frac1n\\sum_{p=1}^n\\1_{\\{L^p\\le t\\}}\\1_{\\{L^p<R^p\\}}\\1_{\\{X^p(L^p)=i\\}},\\\\\n\\mathbb C_i^{(n)}(t)\n&:=\\frac1n\\sum_{p=1}^n\\1_{\\{R^p\\le t\\}}\\1_{\\{L^p<R^p\\}}\\1_{\\{X^p(R^p\\wedge T)=i\\}},\\\\\n\\mathbb N_{ji}^{\\mathrm c,(n)}(t)\n&:=\\frac1n\\sum_{p=1}^n\\int_{(0,t]}\\1_{\\{L^p<s\\le R^p\\}}\\,\\dd N^p_{ji}(s),\n\\qquad j\\neq i,\n\\end{align*}\nand their population counterparts\n\\begin{align*}\nJ_i(t)\n&:=\\Prob(L\\le t,\\ L<R,\\ X(L)=i),\\\\\nC_i(t)\n&:=\\Prob(R\\le t,\\ L<R,\\ X(R\\wedge T)=i),\\\\\nN_{ji}^{\\mathrm c}(t)\n&:=\\E\\left[\\int_{(0,t]}\\1_{\\{L<s\\le R\\}}\\,\\dd N_{ji}(s)\\right],\n\\qquad j\\neq i.\n\\end{align*}\nAveraging \\eqref{eq:key_decomp} empirically and in expectation gives\n\\begin{align}\n\\mathbb W_i^{(n)}(t)\n&=\n\\mathbb J_i^{(n)}(t)-\\mathbb C_i^{(n)}(t)\n+\\sum_{j:j\\neq i}\\Big(\\mathbb N_{ji}^{\\mathrm c,(n)}(t)-\\mathbb N_{ij}^{\\mathrm c,(n)}(t)\\Big),\n\\label{eq:key_decomp_emp}\n\\\\\nW_i^{\\mathrm c}(t)\n&=\nJ_i(t)-C_i(t)\n+\\sum_{j:j\\neq i}\\Big(N_{ji}^{\\mathrm c}(t)-N_{ij}^{\\mathrm c}(t)\\Big).\n\\label{eq:key_decomp_pop}\n\\end{align}\n\nFor fixed $t$, the random variables\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mathbb G_i^{(n)}(t),\\quad \\mathbb J_i^{(n)}(t),\\quad \\mathbb C_i^{(n)}(t),\\quad \\mathbb N_{ji}^{\\mathrm c,(n)}(t),\\quad \\mathbb N_{ij}^{\\mathrm c,(n)}(t)\n\\end{align*}\nare empirical means of iid integrable random variables. Therefore, by the strong law of large numbers,\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mathbb G_i^{(n)}(t)&\\as G_i^{\\mathrm c}(t),\\\\\n\\mathbb J_i^{(n)}(t)&\\as J_i(t),\\\\\n\\mathbb C_i^{(n)}(t)&\\as C_i(t),\\\\\n\\mathbb N_{ji}^{\\mathrm c,(n)}(t)&\\as N_{ji}^{\\mathrm c}(t),\\qquad j\\neq i.\n\\end{align*}\nThe same argument applies to the left limits.\n\nEach map\n\\begin{align*}\nt\\mapsto \\mathbb G_i^{(n)}(t),\\quad\nt\\mapsto \\mathbb J_i^{(n)}(t),\\quad\nt\\mapsto \\mathbb C_i^{(n)}(t),\\quad\nt\\mapsto \\mathbb N_{ji}^{\\mathrm c,(n)}(t)\n\\end{align*}\nis nondecreasing and c\\`adl\\`ag. Each corresponding limit map is a finite-measure cumulative function on $[\\alpha_i,\\beta_i]$. Therefore Theorem~\\ref{th:abstract_gc_cadlag} applies to each component sequence, yielding uniform almost sure convergence. Here, the required integrability is immediate for $\\mathbb J_i^{(n)}$ and $\\mathbb C_i^{(n)}$, while\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mathbb N_{ji}^{\\mathrm c,(n)}(\\theta)\\le \\frac1n\\sum_{p=1}^n N_{ji}^p(T)\n\\end{align*}\nand $N_{ji}(T)\\in L^1(\\Prob)$ by Assumption~\\ref{ass:boundforjumpcounter}.\n\nUsing \\eqref{eq:key_decomp_emp} and \\eqref{eq:key_decomp_pop}, together with the triangle inequality and the uniform convergences above, we obtain\n\\begin{align*}\n\\sup_{0\\le t\\le T}\\big|\\mathbb W_i^{(n)}(t)-W_i^{\\mathrm c}(t)\\big|\n&\\le\n\\sup_{0\\le t\\le T}\\big|\\mathbb J_i^{(n)}(t)-J_i(t)\\big|\n+\\sup_{0\\le t\\le T}\\big|\\mathbb C_i^{(n)}(t)-C_i(t)\\big|\n\\\\\n&\\quad\n+\\sum_{j:j\\neq i}\\sup_{0\\le t\\le T}\\big|\\mathbb N_{ji}^{\\mathrm c,(n)}(t)-N_{ji}^{\\mathrm c}(t)\\big|\n+\\sum_{j:j\\neq i}\\sup_{0\\le t\\le T}\\big|\\mathbb N_{ij}^{\\mathrm c,(n)}(t)-N_{ij}^{\\mathrm c}(t)\\big|\\\\\n& \n\\as0.\n\\end{align*}\nThis proves \\eqref{eq:G_cons} and \\eqref{eq:W_cons}.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\n\n\nWe now transfer the component convergences to the inverse-weighted payment function estimator. Continuity and Hadamard differentiability results for the ratio-integral map are collected in Appendix~\\ref{app:ep_tools}; see Lemma~\\ref{lem:hadamard} and Corollary~\\ref{lem:map_cont}.\n\n\\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \\ref{th:strong_cons}]\nBy Proposition~\\ref{prop:comp_cons},\n\\begin{align*}\n(\\mathbb W_i^{(n)},\\mathbb G_i^{(n)})\\as(W^{\\mathrm c}_i,G_i^{\\mathrm c})\n\\quad\\text{uniformly on }[\\alpha_i,\\beta_i].\n\\end{align*}\nApply Corollary~\\ref{lem:map_cont} with\n\\begin{align*}\n(x_n,y_n)=(\\mathbb W_i^{(n)},\\mathbb G_i^{(n)}),\n\\quad\n(x,y)=(W_i^{\\mathrm c},G_i^{\\mathrm c}).\n\\end{align*}\nThen, using Assumption~\\ref{ass:markov_pos},\n\\begin{align*}\n\\sup_{t \\in [\\alpha_i,\\beta_i]}\\left|\n\\big(\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}(t)-\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}(\\alpha_i)\\big)\n-\\int_{(\\alpha_i,t]}\\frac{1}{W_i^{\\mathrm c}(s-)}\\,G_i^{\\mathrm c}(\\dd s)\\right|\\as0.\n\\end{align*}\nBy Proposition~\\ref{prop:alt_rep}, the limit integral equals $B_i(t)-B_i(\\alpha_i)$.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\n\n\n\\section{Asymptotic normality}\\label{subsec:weak_markov}\n\nWe now show asymptotic normality of the estimators $\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}$, $i \\in \\mathcal{X}$, on the intervals $[\\alpha_i,\\beta_i]$, $i \\in \\mathcal{X}$, from Assumption \\ref{ass:markov_pos}. Before we do that, we derive the Gaussian limits of the empirical components \n\\begin{align*}\n\t\\xi_{i,G}^{(n)}(t)&:=\\sqrt{n}\\big(\\mathbb G_i^{(n)}(t)-G_i^{\\mathrm c}(t)\\big),\n\t\\\\\n\t\\xi_{i,W}^{(n)}(t)&:=\\sqrt{n}\\big(\\mathbb W_i^{(n)}(t)-W_i^{\\mathrm c}(t)\\big).\n\\end{align*}\n\n %\n\\begin{proposition}[Weak convergence of components]\\label{th:weak_comp_markov}\n\tUnder Assumptions~\\ref{ass:indep_censoring}, ~\\ref{ass:markov_moments}, and~\\ref{ass:boundforjumpcounter}, the stacked process\n\t\\begin{align*}\n\t\t\\big(\\xi_{i,G}^{(n)},\\xi_{i,W}^{(n)}\\big)\n\t\\end{align*}\n\tconverges weakly in $\\ell^\\infty([0,\\theta])^2$ to a centered tight Gaussian process\n\t\\begin{align*}\n\t\t\\big(\\xi_{i,G},\\xi_{i,W}\\big),\n\t\\end{align*}\n\twith covariance functions, for $s,t\\in[0,\\theta]$,\n\t\\begin{align*}\n\t\t\\operatorname{Cov}(\\xi_{i,G}(s),\\xi_{i,G}(t))\n\t\t&=\n\t\t\\E\\left[\n\t\t\\left(\\int_{[0,s]}\\1_{\\{L<u\\le R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(u-)=i\\}}\\,\\dd A(u)\\right)\n\t\t\\left(\\int_{[0,t]}\\1_{\\{L<v\\le R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(v-)=i\\}}\\,\\dd A(v)\\right)\n\t\t\\right]\\\\\n\t\t&\\quad-G_i^{\\mathrm c}(s)G_i^{\\mathrm c}(t),\n\t\t\\\\\n\t\t\\operatorname{Cov}(\\xi_{i,G}(s),\\xi_{i,W}(t))\n\t\t&=\n\t\t\\E\\left[\n\t\t\\left(\\int_{[0,s]}\\1_{\\{L<u\\le R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(u-)=i\\}}\\,\\dd A(u)\\right)\n\t\t\\1_{\\{L\\le t<R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(t)=i\\}}\n\t\t\\right]\\\\\n\t\t&\\quad-G_i^{\\mathrm c}(s)W_i^{\\mathrm c}(t),\n\t\t\\\\\n\t\t\\operatorname{Cov}(\\xi_{i,W}(s),\\xi_{i,W}(t))\n\t\t&=\n\t\t\\Prob(L\\le s<R,\\ X(s)=i,\\ L\\le t<R,\\ X(t)=i)\n\t\t\\\\\n\t\t&\\quad -W_i^{\\mathrm c}(s)W_i^{\\mathrm c}(t).\n\t\\end{align*}\n\\end{proposition}\n%\n\\begin{theorem}[Weak convergence of the payment estimator]\\label{th:weak_na_markov}\n\tUnder Assumptions~\\ref{ass:indep_censoring}, \\ref{ass:markov_moments}, \\ref{ass:boundforjumpcounter}, and~\\ref{ass:markov_pos},\n\t\\begin{align*}\n\t\t\\sqrt{n}\\Big((\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}-\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}(\\alpha_i))-(B_i-B_i(\\alpha_i))\\Big)\\dist\\zeta_i\n\t\t\\quad\\text{in }\\ell^\\infty([\\alpha_i,\\beta_i]),\n\t\\end{align*}\n\twhere\n\t\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:weak_B_repr}\n\t\t\\zeta_i(t)\n\t\t=\n\t\t\\int_{(\\alpha_i,t]}\\frac{1}{W_i^{\\mathrm c}(s-)}\\xi_{i,G}(\\dd s)\n\t\t-\n\t\t\\int_{(\\alpha_i,t]}\\frac{\\xi_{i,W}(s-)}{\\big(W_i^{\\mathrm c}(s-)\\big)^2}\\,G_i^{\\mathrm c}(\\dd s).\n\t\\end{equation}\n\\end{theorem}\n%\n\\begin{proof}[Proof of Proposition \\ref{th:weak_comp_markov}]\nLet $O=(X,A,L,R)$ denote one observation. Define the monotone cumulative responses\n\\begin{align*}\n\\psi_{i,G,t}(O)&:=\\int_{[0,t]}\\1_{\\{L<s\\le R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(s-)=i\\}}\\,\\dd A(s),\\\\\n\\psi_{i,J,t}(O)&:=\\1_{\\{L\\le t\\}}\\1_{\\{L<R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(L)=i\\}},\\\\\n\\psi_{i,C,t}(O)&:=\\1_{\\{R\\le t\\}}\\1_{\\{L<R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(R\\wedge T)=i\\}},\\\\\n\\psi_{ji,N,t}(O)&:=\\int_{(0,t]}\\1_{\\{L<s\\le R\\}}\\,\\dd N_{ji}(s),\\qquad j\\neq i.\n\\end{align*}\nFor fixed $O$, each map $t\\mapsto \\psi_{\\bullet,t}(O)$ above is c\\`adl\\`ag and nondecreasing. Their envelopes are\n\\begin{align*}\nF_{i,G}=A(T),\\qquad F_{i,J}=1,\\qquad F_{i,C}=1,\\qquad F_{ji,N}=N_{ji}(T),\n\\end{align*}\nwhich all belong to $L^2(\\Prob)$ by Assumptions~\\ref{ass:markov_moments} and~\\ref{ass:boundforjumpcounter}.\n\nFor each class\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mathcal F_{i,G}&:=\\{\\psi_{i,G,t}:t\\in[0,\\theta]\\},\\\\\n\\mathcal F_{i,J}&:=\\{\\psi_{i,J,t}:t\\in[0,\\theta]\\},\\\\\n\\mathcal F_{i,C}&:=\\{\\psi_{i,C,t}:t\\in[0,\\theta]\\},\\\\\n\\mathcal F_{ji,N}&:=\\{\\psi_{ji,N,t}:t\\in[0,\\theta]\\},\\qquad j\\neq i,\n\\end{align*}\npointwise measurability follows from right-continuity. By Lemma~\\ref{lem:mono_bracketing}, each class has bracketing entropy\n\\begin{align*}\nN_{[\\,]}\\left(\\varepsilon\\|F_{\\bullet}\\|_{L^2(\\Prob)},\\mathcal F_{\\bullet},L^2(\\Prob)\\right)\\le \\frac{C_{\\bullet}}{\\varepsilon^2},\n\\end{align*}\nhence finite entropy integral. Therefore Theorem~\\ref{Donsker} yields weak convergence in $\\ell^\\infty([0,\\theta])$ for\n\\begin{align*}\n\\xi_{i,G}^{(n)},\\quad\n\\xi_{i,J}^{(n)}(t)&:=\\sqrt n\\big(\\mathbb J_i^{(n)}(t)-J_i(t)\\big),\\\\\n\\xi_{i,C}^{(n)}(t)&:=\\sqrt n\\big(\\mathbb C_i^{(n)}(t)-C_i(t)\\big),\\\\\n\\xi_{ji,N}^{(n)}(t)&:=\\sqrt n\\big(\\mathbb N_{ji}^{\\mathrm c,(n)}(t)-N_{ji}^{\\mathrm c}(t)\\big),\\qquad j\\neq i.\n\\end{align*}\n\nTo obtain joint convergence, fix finite collections of times and components from the family\n\\begin{align*}\n\\xi_{i,G}^{(n)},\\quad \\xi_{i,J}^{(n)},\\quad \\xi_{i,C}^{(n)},\\quad \\xi_{ji,N}^{(n)},\\qquad j\\neq i.\n\\end{align*}\nThe resulting finite-dimensional vectors are empirical means of iid centered random vectors with finite second moments, so the multivariate CLT gives convergence of all mixed finite-dimensional distributions. Lemma~\\ref{stack_convergence} then yields joint weak convergence of the full stack.\n\nNow use the exact decompositions \\eqref{eq:key_decomp_emp} and \\eqref{eq:key_decomp_pop} to obtain\n\\begin{align*}\n\\xi_{i,W}^{(n)}(t)\n=\n\\xi_{i,J}^{(n)}(t)-\\xi_{i,C}^{(n)}(t)\n+\\sum_{j:j\\neq i}\\Big(\\xi_{ji,N}^{(n)}(t)-\\xi_{ij,N}^{(n)}(t)\\Big).\n\\end{align*}\nHence $\\xi_{i,W}^{(n)}$ is a continuous linear transform of the already convergent stack, so it converges weakly in $\\ell^\\infty([0,\\theta])$. Applying the corresponding continuous linear map to the full stack and then projecting onto\n\\begin{align*}\n\\big(\\xi_{i,G}^{(n)},\\xi_{i,W}^{(n)}\\big)\n\\end{align*}\ngives the claimed joint limit.\n\nFor the covariance functions, note that\n\\begin{align*}\n\\xi_{i,W}^{(n)}(t)\n=\n\\frac{1}{\\sqrt n}\\sum_{p=1}^n\\Big(\\1_{\\{L^p\\le t<R^p\\}}\\1_{\\{X^p(t)=i\\}}-W_i^{\\mathrm c}(t)\\Big),\n\\end{align*}\nso the one-observation response associated with $\\xi_{i,W}^{(n)}(t)$ is\n\\begin{align*}\n\\psi_{i,W,t}(O):=\\1_{\\{L\\le t<R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(t)=i\\}}.\n\\end{align*}\nGaussian empirical process limits satisfy\n\\begin{align*}\n\\operatorname{Cov}(Gf,Gg)=\\operatorname{Cov}(f(O),g(O)).\n\\end{align*}\nApplying this identity with $(f,g)=(\\psi_{i,G,s},\\psi_{i,G,t})$ gives the first covariance function. Applying it with $(f,g)=(\\psi_{i,G,s},\\psi_{i,W,t})$ gives the second. Finally, applying it with $(f,g)=(\\psi_{i,W,s},\\psi_{i,W,t})$ gives\n\\begin{align*}\n\\operatorname{Cov}(\\xi_{i,W}(s),\\xi_{i,W}(t))\n&=\n\\operatorname{Cov}\\big(\\1_{\\{L\\le s<R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(s)=i\\}},\\1_{\\{L\\le t<R\\}}\\1_{\\{X(t)=i\\}}\\big)\\\\\n&=\n\\Prob(L\\le s<R,\\ X(s)=i,\\ L\\le t<R,\\ X(t)=i)\n-W_i^{\\mathrm c}(s)W_i^{\\mathrm c}(t),\n\\end{align*}\nwhich is the third displayed covariance function.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\n\\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \\ref{th:weak_na_markov}]\nBy Proposition~\\ref{th:weak_comp_markov},\n\\begin{align*}\n\\sqrt{n}\\big((\\mathbb W_i^{(n)},\\mathbb G_i^{(n)})-(W_i^{\\mathrm c},G_i^{\\mathrm c})\\big)\n\\dist\n(\\xi_{i,W},\\xi_{i,G})\n\\quad\\text{in }\\ell^\\infty([0,\\theta])^2.\n\\end{align*}\nSet\n\\begin{align*}\n\\eta_i:=\\inf_{t_i\\le t\\le\\theta}W_i^{\\mathrm c}(t)>0,\n\\end{align*}\nwhich is strictly positive by Assumption~\\ref{ass:markov_pos}. By Proposition~\\ref{prop:comp_cons},\n\\begin{align*}\n\\Prob\\big(\\inf_{t_i\\le t\\le\\theta}\\mathbb W_i^{(n)}(t)\\ge\\eta_i/2\\big)\\to1.\n\\end{align*}\nHence, with probability tending to one, the pair $(\\mathbb W_i^{(n)},\\mathbb G_i^{(n)})$ belongs to the domain\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mathbb D_{\\eta_i/2}\n:=\n\\Big\\{(x,y)\\in D([t_i,\\theta])^2:\\inf_{t_i\\le t\\le\\theta}x(t)\\ge \\eta_i/2,\\ y\\in BV([t_i,\\theta])\\Big\\}.\n\\end{align*}\n\nDefine\n\\begin{align*}\n\\Psi_i(x,y)(t):=\\int_{(t_i,t]}\\frac{1}{x(s-)}\\,y(\\dd s),\\quad t\\in[t_i,\\theta].\n\\end{align*}\nBy Lemma~\\ref{lem:hadamard}, $\\Psi_i$ is Hadamard differentiable at $(W_i^{\\mathrm c},G_i^{\\mathrm c})$, tangentially to $D([t_i,\\theta])^2$, with derivative\n\\begin{align*}\n\\Psi'_{i,(W_i^{\\mathrm c},G_i^{\\mathrm c})}(h_1,h_2)(t)\n=\n\\int_{(t_i,t]}\\frac{1}{W_i^{\\mathrm c}(s-)}\\,h_2(\\dd s)\n-\n\\int_{(t_i,t]}\\frac{h_1(s-)}{\\big(W_i^{\\mathrm c}(s-)\\big)^2}\\,G_i^{\\mathrm c}(\\dd s).\n\\end{align*}\nTherefore Theorem~\\ref{delta_method} yields\n\\begin{align*}\n\\sqrt n\\left(\\Psi_i(\\mathbb W_i^{(n)},\\mathbb G_i^{(n)})-\\Psi_i(W_i^{\\mathrm c},G_i^{\\mathrm c})\\right)\n\\dist\n\\Psi'_{i,(W_i^{\\mathrm c},G_i^{\\mathrm c})}(\\xi_{i,W},\\xi_{i,G}),\n\\end{align*}\nin $\\ell^\\infty([t_i,\\theta])$. By the displayed derivative formula, the limit on the right-hand side is exactly the process \\eqref{eq:weak_B_repr}.\n\nIt remains to identify the two arguments of $\\Psi_i$. By definition of the estimator,\n\\begin{align*}\n\\Psi_i(\\mathbb W_i^{(n)},\\mathbb G_i^{(n)})(t)\n=\n\\int_{(t_i,t]}\\frac{1}{\\mathbb W_i^{(n)}(s-)}\\,\\mathbb G_i^{(n)}(\\dd s)\n=\n\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}(t)-\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}(t_i).\n\\end{align*}\nMoreover, Proposition~\\ref{prop:alt_rep} gives\n\\begin{align*}\n\\Psi_i(W_i^{\\mathrm c},G_i^{\\mathrm c})(t)\n=\n\\int_{(t_i,t]}\\frac{1}{W_i^{\\mathrm c}(s-)}\\,G_i^{\\mathrm c}(\\dd s)\n=\n\\int_{(t_i,t]}\\frac{1}{W_i(s-)}\\,G_i(\\dd s)\n=\nB_i(t)-B_i(t_i).\n\\end{align*}\nCombining the last three displays proves the claim.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\begin{remark}[Confidence intervals and bands]\\label{remark:ci}\nLet $\\widehat K_i$ be a consistent estimator of the covariance function\n\\begin{align*}\nK_i(s,t)=\\operatorname{Cov}(\\zeta_i(s),\\zeta_i(t)).\n\\end{align*}\nWith individual data, it can be constructed as follows. For policy $p$, set\n\\begin{align*}\nG_{i,p}^{\\mathrm c}(t)\n&:=\n\\int_{[0,t]}\\1_{\\{L^p<s\\le R^p\\}}\\1_{\\{X^p(s-)=i\\}}\\,\\dd A^p(s),\\\\\nW_{i,p}^{\\mathrm c}(t)\n&:=\n\\1_{\\{L^p\\le t<R^p\\}}\\1_{\\{X^p(t)=i\\}}.\n\\end{align*}\nThen define\n\\begin{align*}\n\\widehat Z_{i,p}(t)\n&:=\n\\int_{(\\alpha_i,t]}\\frac{1}{\\mathbb W_i^{(n)}(s-)}\n\\,\\dd\\big(G_{i,p}^{\\mathrm c}-\\mathbb G_i^{(n)}\\big)(s)\\\\\n&\\quad\n-\n\\int_{(\\alpha_i,t]}\n\\frac{W_{i,p}^{\\mathrm c}(s-)-\\mathbb W_i^{(n)}(s-)}\n{\\big(\\mathbb W_i^{(n)}(s-)\\big)^2}\n\\,\\mathbb G_i^{(n)}(\\dd s),\n\\qquad t\\in[\\alpha_i,\\beta_i],\n\\end{align*}\nand take\n\\begin{align*}\n\\widehat K_i(s,t)\n:=\n\\frac1n\\sum_{p=1}^n \\widehat Z_{i,p}(s)\\widehat Z_{i,p}(t).\n\\end{align*}\nPointwise confidence intervals for $B_i(t)-B_i(\\alpha_i)$ are then given by\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}(t)-\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}(\\alpha_i)\n\\ \\pm\\\nz_{1-\\gamma/2}\\sqrt{\\frac{\\widehat K_i(t,t)}{n}}.\n\\end{align*}\nFor simultaneous confidence bands on $[\\alpha_i,\\beta_i]$, one may estimate the quantile $c_{1-\\gamma}$ of\n\\begin{align*}\n\\sup_{t\\in[\\alpha_i,\\beta_i]}\n\\left|\\frac{\\zeta_i(t)}{\\sqrt{K_i(t,t)}}\\right|\n\\end{align*}\nby multiplier simulation: draw independent variables $e_1,\\ldots,e_n$ with mean zero and variance one, form\n\\begin{align*}\n\\zeta_i^*(t)\n:=\n\\frac1{\\sqrt n}\\sum_{p=1}^n e_p\\widehat Z_{i,p}(t),\n\\end{align*}\nand let $\\widehat c_{1-\\gamma}$ be the empirical $(1-\\gamma)$-quantile of\n\\begin{align*}\n\\sup_{t\\in[\\alpha_i,\\beta_i]}\n\\left|\\frac{\\zeta_i^*(t)}{\\sqrt{\\widehat K_i(t,t)}}\\right|.\n\\end{align*}\nThe simultaneous band is\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}(t)-\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}(\\alpha_i)\n\\ \\pm\\\n\\widehat c_{1-\\gamma}\\sqrt{\\frac{\\widehat K_i(t,t)}{n}},\n\\qquad t\\in[\\alpha_i,\\beta_i].\n\\end{align*}\nThis covariance estimation requires individual data, because it uses products of policy-specific terms. This is in contrast to the estimator $\\mathbb B_i^{(n)}$ itself, which can be computed from the aggregate payment and exposure processes appearing in \\eqref{eq:BBhat}.\n\\hfill\\qed\n\\end{remark}\n\n\n\\section{Numerical Example: disability insurance}\\label{sec:numerical_examples}\n\nFor illustrative purposes, we artificially generate data from the micro-level model described in Ahmad and Bladt (2023), which we then use to demonstrate the estimation of macro-level payment functions. This artificial setting allows to evaluate the performance of our estimator.\nThe macro state space $\\mathcal X=\\{1,2,3\\}$ distinguishes between the states active, disabled, and dead. The state disabled has ten micro-level sub-states, so the enlarged state space is\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mathcal Z=\\{(1,1),(2,1),\\ldots,(2,10),(3,1)\\}.\n\\end{align*}\n In state active and dead, micro levels are meaningless and are therefore skipped. The state $(3,1)$ is absorbing. The model setting is illustrated in Figure~\\ref{fig:simulation_micro_macro}. The process is simulated in age time on $[50,70]$ and starts in $(1,1)$ at age $50$. \n\n\\begin{figure}[!htbp]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\scalebox{0.82}{\n\t\t\\begin{tikzpicture}[\n\t\t\tnode distance=2em and 0em,\n\t\t\tstatebox/.style={\n\t\t\t\trectangle,\n\t\t\t\trounded corners,\n\t\t\t\tdraw=black, thick,\n\t\t\t\ttext width=6.5em,\n\t\t\t\tminimum height=2.4em,\n\t\t\t\ttext centered,\n\t\t\t\tfill=black!2},\n\t\t\tmicrobox/.style={\n\t\t\t\trectangle,\n\t\t\t\trounded corners,\n\t\t\t\tdraw=black, thick,\n\t\t\t\ttext width=4.2em,\n\t\t\t\tminimum height=2.2em,\n\t\t\t\ttext centered,\n\t\t\t\tfill=black!2},\n\t\t\tarr/.style={-{Stealth[length=2mm]}, shorten <=4pt, shorten >=4pt},\n\t\t\tdarr/.style={-{Stealth[length=2mm]}, shorten <=4pt, shorten >=4pt, densely dotted}\n\t\t\t]\n\t\t\t\\node[microbox] (21) {$(2,1)$};\n\t\t\t\\node[right = 13mm of 21] (2temp) {$\\cdots$};\n\t\t\t\\node[microbox, right = 35mm of 21] (210) {$(2,10)$};\n\t\t\t\\node[statebox, left = 30mm of 21] (11) {active\\\\$(1,1)$};\n\t\t\t\\node[draw = none, fill = none, left = 48mm of 210] (test) {};\n\t\t\t\\node[statebox, below = 28mm of test] (3) {dead\\\\$(3,1)$};\n\t\t\t\\node[right = 0pt] at ($(210.south)+(0,1.1)$) {disabled};\n\t\t\t\\draw[thick, densely dotted, rounded corners]\n\t\t\t($(21.north west)+(-0.45,0.65)$) rectangle ($(210.south east)+(0.65,-0.45)$);\n\t\t\t\\path\n\t\t\t($(11.north east)$) edge [arr, bend left=15] node [above, font=\\small] {$\\nu_{12}(t)\\pi_e(t)$} ($(21.north west)+(-0.55,-0.1)$)\n\t\t\t($(21.south west)+(-0.55,0.1)$) edge [arr, bend left=15] node [below, font=\\small] {$\\beta_{e1}(t)$} ($(11.south east)$)\n\t\t\t($(210.south)+(-1.4,-0.55)$) edge [arr, bend left=15] node [right, font=\\small] {$\\beta_{e3}(t)$} ($(3.north east)$)\n\t\t\t($(11.south)$) edge [arr, bend right=15] node [below left, font=\\small] {$\\nu_{13}(t)$} ($(3.north west)$)\n\t\t\t($(21.north east)+(0.0,0.1)$) edge [darr, bend left=10] node [above, font=\\small] {$\\mu_{ef}^{22}(t)$} ($(2temp.west)+(-0.1,0.1)$)\n\t\t\t($(2temp.east)+(0.1,0.1)$) edge [darr, bend left=10] ($(210.north west)+(0.1,0.1)$)\n\t\t\t($(210.south west)+(0.1,-0.1)$) edge [darr, bend left=10] ($(2temp.east)+(0.1,-0.1)$)\n\t\t\t($(2temp.west)+(-0.1,-0.1)$) edge [darr, bend left=10] ($(21.south east)+(0.0,-0.1)$)\n\t\t\t;\n\t\\end{tikzpicture}}\n\t\\caption{Three macro states with ten unobserved micro states in the disabled macro state.}\n\t\\label{fig:simulation_micro_macro}\n\\end{figure}\n\nThe disabled block is a fitted ten-state aggregate Markov model. For $e\\neq f$,\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mu_{ef}^{22}(t)=\\exp(a_{ef}+b_{ef}t),\n\\end{align*}\nand the exit rates from disabled micro state $e$ to the active and dead macro states are\n\\begin{align*}\n\\beta_{e1}(t)=\\exp(c_{e1}+d_{e1}t),\n\\qquad\n\\beta_{e3}(t)=\\exp(c_{e3}+d_{e3}t).\n\\end{align*}\nEntries into disability use the fitted reset distribution\n\\begin{align*}\n\\pi_e(t)\n=\n\\frac{\\exp(\\eta_e^0+\\eta_e^1 t)}\n{\\sum_{f=1}^{10}\\exp(\\eta_f^0+\\eta_f^1 t)},\n\\qquad e=1,\\ldots,10,\n\\end{align*}\nand have rates\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mu_{(1,1),(2,e)}(t)=\\nu_{12}(t)\\pi_e(t).\n\\end{align*}\nThe coefficients\n\\begin{align*}\na_{ef},\\,b_{ef},\\,c_{e1},\\,d_{e1},\\,c_{e3},\\,d_{e3},\\,\\eta_e^0,\\,\\eta_e^1\n\\end{align*}\nare the fitted coefficients from~\\cite{AhmadBladt2023} and are not estimated from the payment data.\nThe total active-to-disabled rate is\n\\begin{align*}\n\\nu_{12}(t)\n=\n\\begin{cases}\n\\exp(q(t)),\n& t\\le67,\\\\\n0.0009687435,& t>67,\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{align*}\nwhere\n\\begin{align*}\nq(t)\n&=\n72.53851-10.66927t+0.53371t^2-0.012798t^3\\\\\n&\\quad\n+1.4922\\cdot10^{-4}t^4-6.8007\\cdot10^{-7}t^5.\n\\end{align*}\nTo close the three-state model we add the simple active-to-dead rate\n\\begin{align*}\n\\nu_{13}(t)=\\exp(-10.5+0.09t).\n\\end{align*}\nThis last rate is not essential for the target below; it only completes the simulated life history.\n\nHere, we focus exclusively on disability benefits payed while the policyholder is in the disabled macro-state. We assume that\n\\begin{align*}\n\\dd A_{(2,e)}(t)= r_e\\,\\dd t,\n\\qquad\nr_e=e,\\quad e=1,\\ldots,10,\n\\end{align*}\nand there are no payments in the active or dead macro states. The target is the projected disabled payment function\n\\begin{align*}\nB_2(t)-B_2(60)\n=\n\\int_{(60,t]}\n\\frac{\\sum_{e=1}^{10}r_e\\,\\Prob(X(s-)=(2,e))}\n{\\Prob(X(s-)\\in\\{(2,1),\\ldots,(2,10)\\})}\n\\,\\dd s,\n\\qquad t\\in[60,70],\n\\end{align*}\ncf.~equation \\eqref{EquilityofEdBEdA}.\nThere is no closed form for this quantity that is useful here, because the disabled block is a calibrated ten-state inhomogeneous Markov chain. We therefore approximate it once by an uncensored Monte Carlo sample of size $300,\\!000$. This approximation is used only as a benchmark, not for estimation.\n\nThe observed samples are independently right-censored. We take $L\\equiv50$ and\n\\begin{align*}\nR=\\min(70,U),\\qquad U\\sim \\operatorname{Unif}(63,75),\n\\end{align*}\nindependently of the path. Thus all policies are observed at the beginning of the estimation window $[60,70]$, while exposure decreases toward the right endpoint.\n\nThe estimator is evaluated exactly between event times. Let\n\\begin{align*}\nD=\\{(2,1),\\ldots,(2,10)\\}.\n\\end{align*}\nFor $s\\in[60,70]$, define the aggregate disabled exposure count and aggregate disabled payment rate by\n\\begin{align*}\n\\widehat Y(s)\n&:=\n\\sum_{p=1}^n\\1_{\\{s<R^p\\}}\\1_{\\{X^p(s)\\in D\\}},\\\\\n\\widehat H(s)\n&:=\n\\sum_{p=1}^n\\sum_{e=1}^{10}\nr_e\\1_{\\{s<R^p\\}}\\1_{\\{X^p(s)=(2,e)\\}}.\n\\end{align*}\nThe target estimator then becomes\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mathbb B_2^{(n)}(t)-\\mathbb B_2^{(n)}(60)\n=\n\\int_{(60,t]}\\frac{\\widehat H(s)}{\\widehat Y(s)}\\,\\dd s,\n\\qquad t\\in[60,70],\n\\end{align*}\nwith the integrand taken as zero when $\\widehat Y(s)=0$. We again remark that this formula uses only aggregate exposure counts and aggregate payment rates.\n\nFor the confidence intervals, we follow Remark~\\ref{remark:ci}, where individual data are used through\n\\begin{align*}\n\\widehat Z_p(t)\n=\n\\int_{(60,t]}\nn\\left\\{\n\\frac{\\widehat H_p(s)}{\\widehat Y(s)}\n-\n\\frac{\\widehat Y_p(s)\\widehat H(s)}{\\widehat Y(s)^2}\n\\right\\}\\dd s,\n\\end{align*}\nwhere\n\\begin{align*}\n\\widehat Y_p(s)\n&:=\n\\1_{\\{s<R^p\\}}\\1_{\\{X^p(s)\\in D\\}},\\\\\n\\widehat H_p(s)\n&:=\n\\sum_{e=1}^{10}r_e\\1_{\\{s<R^p\\}}\\1_{\\{X^p(s)=(2,e)\\}}.\n\\end{align*}\nThe same zero convention is used when $\\widehat Y(s)=0$.\nWe estimate $\\operatorname{Var}(\\zeta_2(t))$ by\n\\begin{align*}\n\\frac1n\\sum_{p=1}^n\\widehat Z_p(t)^2\n\\end{align*}\nand plot the corresponding pointwise $95\\%$ confidence intervals.\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htbp]\n\\centering\n\\begin{minipage}[t]{0.49\\textwidth}\n\\centering\n{\\scriptsize $n=500$\\par\\vspace{-1mm}}\n\\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,trim=4mm 3mm 4mm 4mm,clip]{Plots/final_simulation_n500.pdf}\n\\end{minipage}\\hfill\n\\begin{minipage}[t]{0.49\\textwidth}\n\\centering\n{\\scriptsize $n=1000$\\par\\vspace{-1mm}}\n\\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,trim=4mm 3mm 4mm 4mm,clip]{Plots/final_simulation_n1000.pdf}\n\\end{minipage}\n\n\\vspace{-1mm}\n\n\\begin{minipage}[t]{0.49\\textwidth}\n\\centering\n{\\scriptsize $n=5000$\\par\\vspace{-1mm}}\n\\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,trim=4mm 3mm 4mm 4mm,clip]{Plots/final_simulation_n5000.pdf}\n\\end{minipage}\\hfill\n\\begin{minipage}[t]{0.49\\textwidth}\n\\centering\n{\\scriptsize $n=10000$\\par\\vspace{-1mm}}\n\\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,trim=4mm 3mm 4mm 4mm,clip]{Plots/final_simulation_n10000.pdf}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\caption{Estimation of $B_2(t)-B_2(60)$ under independent right-censoring. The solid black curve is the Monte Carlo benchmark, the dashed red curve is the aggregate estimator, and the grey region is the pointwise $95\\%$ confidence band.}\n\\label{fig:final_simulation}\n\\end{figure}\n\nFigure~\\ref{fig:final_simulation} illustrates two features of the theory. First, the estimator is based only on aggregate exposure counts and aggregate payment rates, but it still estimates the projected disabled payment function effectively, which is the primary goal of this paper. The micro process is hidden and highly structured, yet it enters the target only through the conditional average disabled payment rate. Notice that in this numeric example, the true curve is close to linear due to the payment process structure and simulation setup.\n\nSecond, the confidence bands reflect the information loss from censoring. The denominator $\\widehat Y(s)$ is an exposure quantity, and it decreases toward the end of the interval because policies are censored after age $63$. The bands therefore react not only to $n$, but also to where exposure is available. The panels in Figure~\\ref{fig:final_simulation} illustrate the contraction of the pointwise uncertainty and the improved accuracy of the aggregate estimator toward the benchmark at the expected root-$n$ scale. However, we stress this additional uncertainty quantification is only possible when individual information is also available.\n\n\\iffalse\n\nAs mentioned in the introduction, actuaries often aggregate different disability statuses into broader categories in disability insurance. Below, we provide a numerical example in which all disability statuses are combined into a single macro state. Let the macro state space\n$$\\mathcal{X}= \\{a,i,d\\}$$ distinguish the states `active', `invalid', and `dead'. The micro states \n$$\\mathcal{S} = \\{1, 2, 3, 4\\}$$\nshall describe four different levels of disability.\nThe numerical study targets the state-specific mean cumulative payment process $B_i$ and estimates it by \\eqref{eq:BBhat}.\n\n\nWe simulate a time-inhomogeneous Markov jump process on the enlarged state space\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mathcal{Z} = \\{a,i,d\\} \\times \\{1,2,3,4\\},\n\\end{align*}\nwith initial macro state $a$ and absorbing macro state $d$. For an insured person who is currently in state $a$ or $d$, the micro states are meaningless.\nThe non-zero enlarged-state intensities are\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mu_{(a,\\cdot)(i,k)}(t)&=\\mu_{ai}(t)\\,r_{ai}^{k},\\\\\n\\mu_{(a,\\cdot)(d,\\cdot)}(t)&=\\mu_{ad}(t),\\\\\n\\mu_{(i,k)(d,\\cdot)}(t)&=\\mu_{id}(t)\\,r_{id}^{k}.\n\\end{align*}\nThus $\\mu_{ai}$, $\\mu_{ad}$, and $\\mu_{id}$ are the macro-level transition intensities, while $r_{ai}^{k}$ and $r_{id}^{k}$ distribute jumps into and out of the disability state across latent destination micro states.\n\n\n\n{\\color{blue} [$\\downarrow \\downarrow \\downarrow \\downarrow $ TO BE REVISED $\\downarrow \\downarrow \\downarrow \\downarrow $] ]}\n\n{\\color{blue} [How about using similar transition rates as in Example 5 of\\\\ https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.10661\n?]}\n\nWe choose\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mu_{12}(t)=0.09+0.0018t,\\quad\n\\mu_{13}(t)=0.01+0.0002t,\\quad\n\\mu_{23}(t)=0.06+0.0020t,\n\\end{align*}\nand\n\\begin{align*}\nr_{12}^{ef}\n=\n\\frac{\\exp(0.20f-0.05ef/4)}{\\sum_{m=1}^{4}\\exp(0.20m-0.05em/4)}.\n\\end{align*}\nThe initial micro distribution in macro state $1$ is\n\\begin{align*}\n\\pi_{1,e}(0)\\propto \\exp\\big(0.25e+0.15\\sin(e)\\big).\n\\end{align*}\nThis is the probability that a policy starts in latent micro state $e$ within macro state $1$.\nFor payments, we set\n\\begin{align*}\nA^{(1,e)}(t)&=\\int_0^t a_e(s)\\,\\dd s,\\\\\nA^{(2,e)}(t)&\\equiv0,\\\\\nA^{(3,1)}(t)&\\equiv0,\n\\end{align*}\nwith\n\\begin{align*}\na_e(t)=0.18+0.04e+0.02\\sin(0.15t).\n\\end{align*}\nThus $a_e(t)$ is the instantaneous payment rate in micro state $(1,e)$, and $A^{(1,e)}$ is the cumulative payment that would be accrued by remaining in that micro state up to time $t$.\nThus payments occur only while the path remains in macro state $1$, and there are no transition payments. In this design, $G_1$ also coincides with the overall mean cumulative payment process.\n\nBecause the micro index is fixed until exit from macro state $1$, the benchmark is\n\\begin{align*}\nG_1(t)\n&=\n\\int_0^t\n\\exp\\big(-0.10s-0.001s^2\\big)\n\\sum_{e=1}^{4}\\pi_{1,e}(0)a_e(s)\\,\\dd s.\n\\end{align*}\nHere $\\exp(-0.10s-0.001s^2)$ is the survival probability of remaining in macro state $1$ up to time $s$, since $\\mu_{12}(s)+\\mu_{13}(s)=0.10+0.002s$, and the second factor is the latent-state average payment rate at time $s$.\nWe simulate $n=4000$ iid trajectories with $L\\equiv0$ and independent right-censoring $R\\sim\\mathrm{Unif}(10,40)$, and fit \\eqref{eq:BBhat}. Here $t_0=0$, so Theorem~\\ref{th:strong_cons} applies on the level scale.\nIn the implementation, the cumulative payments are evaluated on a grid of width $0.05$.\n\\begin{figure}[!htbp]\n\\centering\nPLOT!!!%\\includegraphics[width=0.62\\textwidth]{Plots/payment_markov_numericexample.pdf}\n\\caption{Markov study based on the enlarged-state model above, with payments only in macro state $1$. The solid line is the benchmark mean cumulative payment process $G_1(t)$, obtained by averaging the payment rates $a_e$ over the initial latent micro distribution and weighting by survival in macro state $1$. The dashed line is the inverse-weighted estimator $\\mathbb B_1^{(n)}(t)$ from \\eqref{eq:BBhat}, computed from $n=4000$ simulated trajectories under independent right-censoring.}\n\\label{fig:payment_markov_numericexample}\n\\end{figure}\n\nFigure~\\ref{fig:payment_markov_numericexample} shows that the inverse-weighted estimator tracks the target curve closely.\n\n\\fi\n\n\\newpage\n\n\\bibliographystyle{apalike}\n\\bibliography{final.bib}\n\n\\newpage\n\\appendix\n\n\n\\section{Empirical process results}\\label{app:ep_tools}\n\nThis appendix collects the standard results used in the proofs.\n\nWe begin with the functional map underlying the inverse-weighted estimator.\n\n\\begin{lemma}[Hadamard differentiability of the ratio-integral map]\\label{lem:hadamard}\nFix $0\\le a<b\\le T$. Define\n\\begin{align*}\n\\Psi(x,y)(t):=\\int_{(a,t]}\\frac{1}{x(s-)}\\,y(\\dd s),\\quad t\\in[a,b],\n\\end{align*}\non\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mathbb D_\\eta:=\\{(x,y)\\in D([a,b])\\times D([a,b]):\\inf_{s\\in[a,b]}x(s)\\ge\\eta,\\ y\\in BV([a,b])\\},\n\\end{align*}\nfor fixed $\\eta>0$. Then $\\Psi:\\mathbb D_\\eta\\to D([a,b])$ is Hadamard differentiable at every $(x,y)\\in\\mathbb D_\\eta$, tangentially to $D([a,b])\\times D([a,b])$, with derivative\n\\begin{align}\n\\Psi'_{(x,y)}(h_1,h_2)(t)\n&=\n\\int_{(a,t]}\\frac{1}{x(s-)}\\,h_2(\\dd s)\n-\\int_{(a,t]}\\frac{h_1(s-)}{x(s-)^2}\\,y(\\dd s),\n\\label{eq:hadamard_deriv}\n\\end{align}\nwhere the Stieltjes integrals are understood by integration by parts.\n\\end{lemma}\n\nContinuity used in the consistency arguments follows immediately.\n\n\\begin{corollary}[Continuity of the ratio-integral map]\\label{lem:map_cont}\nFix $0\\le a<b\\le T$ and $(x,y)\\in\\mathbb D_\\eta$. If\n\\begin{align*}\n(x_n,y_n)\\to(x,y)\\quad\\text{in }D([a,b])\\times D([a,b])\n\\end{align*}\nfor the uniform norm, with $(x_n,y_n)\\in\\mathbb D_\\eta$ for all large $n$, then\n\\begin{align*}\n\\sup_{t\\in[a,b]}\\left|\\Psi(x_n,y_n)(t)-\\Psi(x,y)(t)\\right|\\to0.\n\\end{align*}\n\\end{corollary}\n\nThe next result is the uniform law used for monotone c\\`adl\\`ag component processes.\n\n\\begin{theorem}[Abstract Glivenko--Cantelli for monotone c\\`adl\\`ag maps]\\label{th:abstract_gc_cadlag}\nLet $T:[0,\\theta]\\to\\R$ be bounded, nondecreasing, and c\\`adl\\`ag. Let $T^{(n)}:[0,\\theta]\\to\\R$ be random nondecreasing c\\`adl\\`ag maps. If for every $t\\in[0,\\theta]$,\n\\begin{align*}\nT^{(n)}(t)\\as T(t),\n\\quad\nT^{(n)}(t-)\\as T(t-),\n\\end{align*}\nthen\n\\begin{align*}\n\\sup_{0\\le t\\le\\theta}|T^{(n)}(t)-T(t)|\\as0.\n\\end{align*}\n\\end{theorem}\n\nThis is the compact-interval version of the abstract Glivenko--Cantelli lemma.\n\n\\begin{lemma}[Bracketing bound for monotone cumulative classes]\\label{lem:mono_bracketing}\nLet $\\{V_t:t\\in[0,\\theta]\\}$ be pointwise measurable, c\\`adl\\`ag, and nondecreasing in $t$, and set\n\\begin{align*}\n\\mathcal F_V:=\\{f_t:t\\in[0,\\theta]\\},\\quad f_t(\\omega):=V_t(\\omega),\n\\end{align*}\nwith envelope $F(\\omega):=V_\\theta(\\omega)\\in L^2(\\Prob)$. Then for every $\\varepsilon\\in(0,1]$,\n\\begin{align*}\nN_{[\\,]}\\left(\\varepsilon\\|F\\|_{L^2(\\Prob)},\\mathcal F_V,L^2(\\Prob)\\right)\\le \\frac{2}{\\varepsilon^2}+1.\n\\end{align*}\n\\end{lemma}\n\\begin{proof}\nDefine\n\\begin{align*}\n\\Gamma(t):=\\E[V_tF],\\quad t\\in[0,\\theta].\n\\end{align*}\nSince $0\\le V_t\\le F$, $\\Gamma$ is nondecreasing c\\`adl\\`ag, with\n\\begin{align*}\n0\\le \\Gamma(\\theta)-\\Gamma(0)\\le \\E[F^2]=\\|F\\|_{L^2(\\Prob)}^2.\n\\end{align*}\nChoose a partition\n\\begin{align*}\n0=t_0<t_1<\\cdots<t_m=\\theta\n\\end{align*}\nsuch that\n\\begin{align*}\n\\Gamma(t_r-)-\\Gamma(t_{r-1})\\le \\varepsilon^2\\|F\\|_{L^2(\\Prob)}^2,\\quad r=1,\\dots,m,\n\\end{align*}\nand\n\\begin{align*}\nm\\le 2\\varepsilon^{-2}+1.\n\\end{align*}\nFor each $r$, define brackets\n\\begin{align*}\nl_r:=f_{t_{r-1}},\\quad u_r:=f_{t_r-}.\n\\end{align*}\nMonotonicity in $t$ implies that for every $t\\in[t_{r-1},t_r)$,\n\\begin{align*}\nl_r\\le f_t\\le u_r.\n\\end{align*}\nAlso, $0\\le u_r-l_r\\le F$, hence\n\\begin{align*}\n\\|u_r-l_r\\|_{L^2(\\Prob)}^2\n&=\\E[(u_r-l_r)^2]\n\\le \\E[(u_r-l_r)F]\\\\\n&=\\Gamma(t_r-)-\\Gamma(t_{r-1})\n\\le \\varepsilon^2\\|F\\|_{L^2(\\Prob)}^2.\n\\end{align*}\nTherefore each bracket has $L^2$-width at most $\\varepsilon\\|F\\|_{L^2(\\Prob)}$, and at most $2\\varepsilon^{-2}+1$ brackets are needed.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\\begin{theorem}[Bracketing CLT, Donsker's theorem]\\label{Donsker}\nA measurable class $\\mathcal{F}$ with envelope $F\\in L^2(\\Prob)$ is $\\Prob$-Donsker if\n\\begin{align*}\nJ_{[\\,]}(1,\\mathcal F,L^2(\\Prob))\n:=\n\\int_{(0,1)}\n\\sqrt{\\log N_{[\\,]}(\\varepsilon,\\mathcal F,L^2(\\Prob))}\n\\,\\dd\\varepsilon\n<\\infty.\n\\end{align*}\n\\end{theorem}\n\n\\begin{lemma}[From marginal to joint weak convergence]\\label{stack_convergence}\nLet $X_n\\dist X$ in $\\ell^\\infty(T)$ and $Y_n\\dist Y$ in $\\ell^\\infty(S)$, with tight limits. If all mixed finite-dimensional vectors of $(X_n,Y_n)$ converge to those of $(X,Y)$, then $(X_n,Y_n)\\dist (X,Y)$ in $\\ell^\\infty(T)\\times\\ell^\\infty(S)$.\n\\end{lemma}\n\n\\begin{theorem}[Functional $\\delta$-method]\\label{delta_method}\nLet $\\mathbb D$ and $\\mathbb E$ be normed spaces. Let $\\phi\\colon\\mathbb D_{\\phi}\\subseteq \\mathbb D\\to \\mathbb E$ be Hadamard differentiable at $\\theta$ tangentially to $\\mathbb D_{0}$. Let $X_n\\colon\\Omega\\to \\mathbb D_{\\phi}$ be maps with\n\\begin{align*}\nr_n(X_n-\\theta)\\dist X\n\\end{align*}\nfor some sequence of constants $r_n\\to \\infty$, where $X$ is tight and takes values in $\\mathbb D_{0}$. Then\n\\begin{align*}\nr_n\\big(\\phi(X_n)-\\phi(\\theta)\\big)\\dist \\phi'_{\\theta}(X)\n\\end{align*}\nin $\\mathbb E$.\n\\end{theorem}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091171,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31971"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31971"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Alessandro Botta"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Alessandro Botta, Shiven Garisa, Jaya Vardhini Akurathi, Ahsanul Ameen Sabit, Trey Woodlief, Soneya Binta Hossain"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"CoCoMUT: A Tool for Code-Context Mining and Automated Dataset Generation"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"5 pages, 1 figure. Submitted to ISSTA 2026 Tool Track"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.SE"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Software-engineering assistants often need method-level context beyond an isolated body, including enclosing-class information, documentation, callers, callees, type hierarchy, and structural characteristics. Manually collecting this context is time-consuming, inconsistent, and difficult to reproduce across large Java projects.\n We present CoCoMUT, a Java tool for Code-Context Mining and Automated Dataset Generation. CoCoMUT extracts context for a focal method or generates datasets at class, package, or system scope. It discovers project structure, resolves build and classpath information, constructs a SootUp static call graph, and reconciles bytecode-level call edges with Spoon-based source extraction. Each method record combines source, class, documentation, call-graph, and metadata context, providing reproducible inputs for training and running learned software-engineering techniques.\n The key contribution is a reusable, task-independent pipeline that unifies build discovery, source extraction, call-graph construction, source-bytecode reconciliation, and versioned JSON dataset generation. The resulting records can be consumed individually as context for a focal method or collectively as datasets for documentation, explanation, testing, review, repair, search, and program-comprehension workflows. We evaluate CoCoMUT on 20 real-world Java repositories evenly split between Maven and Gradle. CoCoMUT processed all 20 repositories, emitting 56,512 method-context records and 386,048 serialized call edges. Among call edges whose bytecode targets belonged to project source, CoCoMUT reconciled 97.8% to source method identities. In a manual audit of 200 randomly sampled methods across 10 systems, 99.0% of generated context records passed all applicable correctness checks."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:12:44 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:12:44 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Botta","Alessandro",""],["Garisa","Shiven",""],["Akurathi","Jaya Vardhini",""],["Sabit","Ahsanul Ameen",""],["Woodlief","Trey",""],["Hossain","Soneya Binta",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Botta\",\n \"Alessandro\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Garisa\",\n \"Shiven\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Akurathi\",\n \"Jaya Vardhini\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Sabit\",\n \"Ahsanul Ameen\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Woodlief\",\n \"Trey\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Hossain\",\n \"Soneya Binta\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: CoCoMUT.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[sigconf]{acmart}\n\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{tabularx}\n\\usepackage{listings}\n\\usepackage{xspace}\n\\usepackage{tikz}\n\\usepackage{balance}\n\\usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta,positioning,fit,calc}\n\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{tabularx}\n\\usepackage{array}\n\\usepackage{ragged2e}\n\\usepackage{textcomp}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\n\\newcolumntype{Y}{>{\\RaggedRight\\arraybackslash}X}\n\\newcolumntype{P}[1]{>{\\RaggedRight\\arraybackslash}p{#1}}\n\n\\settopmatter{printacmref=true}\n% \\renewcommand\\footnotetextcopyrightpermission[1]{}\n\\setlength{\\textfloatsep}{6pt}\n\\setlength{\\floatsep}{6pt}\n\\setlength{\\intextsep}{6pt}\n\n\\newcommand{\\tool}{\\textsc{CoCoMUT}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\jsonl}{\\textsc{JSONL}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\spoon}{\\textsc{Spoon}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\sootup}{\\textsc{SootUp}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\stageheader}[2]{\\textcolor{#1!45!black}{\\bfseries\\large #2}}\n\n\n\\newcommand{\\todoc}[2]{{\\textcolor{#1}{#2}}}\n\\newcommand{\\todoblack}[1]{{\\todoc{black}{\\textbf{[[#1]]}}}}\n\\newcommand{\\todored}[1]{{\\todoc{red}{\\textbf{[[#1]]}}}}\n\\newcommand{\\todogreen}[1]{\\todoc{green}{\\textbf{[[#1]]}}}\n\\newcommand{\\todoblue}[1]{\\todoc{black}{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\todoorange}[1]{\\todoc{orange}{\\textbf{[[#1]]}}}\n\\newcommand{\\todobrown}[1]{\\todoc{brown}{\\textbf{[[#1]]}}}\n\\newcommand{\\todogray}[1]{\\todoc{gray}{\\textbf{[[#1]]}}}\n\\newcommand{\\todopurple}[1]{\\todoc{purple}{\\textbf{[[#1]]}}}\n\\newcommand{\\todopink}[1]{\\todoc{magenta}{\\textbf{[[#1]]}}}\n\\newcommand{\\todocyan}[1]{\\todoc{cyan}{\\textbf{[[#1]]}}}\n\\newcommand{\\todoviolet}[1]{\\todoc{violet}{\\textbf{[[#1]]}}}\n\\newcommand{\\todo}[1]{\\todored{TODO: #1}}\n\\newcommand{\\trey}[1]{\\todopink{Trey: #1}}\n\\newcommand{\\Ale}[1]{\\todoorange{Ale: #1}}\n\\newcommand{\\soneya}[1]{\\todogreen{Soneya: #1}}\n\\newcommand{\\ignore}[1]{}\n\\newcommand{\\raygan}[1]{\\todoblue{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\toolname}{Toggle}\n\n% Evaluation constants and measured results.\n\\newcommand{\\EvalReposTotal}{20}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalReposMaven}{10}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalReposGradle}{10}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalSourceSet}{main}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalScope}{all}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalCallGraph}{RTA}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalTimeoutSeconds}{1200}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalCompileTimeoutSeconds}{300}\n\n% RQ1: build, bytecode, call-graph availability.\n\\newcommand{\\EvalMavenBuildSuccess}{10}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalGradleBuildSuccess}{10}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalTotalBuildSuccess}{20}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalMavenBytecodeAvailable}{10}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalGradleBytecodeAvailable}{10}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalTotalBytecodeAvailable}{20}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalMavenCallGraphAvailable}{10}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalGradleCallGraphAvailable}{10}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalTotalCallGraphAvailable}{20}\n\n% RQ1: emitted records and serialized call-edge entries.\n\\newcommand{\\EvalMavenMethods}{43,508}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalGradleMethods}{13,004}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalTotalMethods}{56,512}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalMavenRows}{43,508}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalGradleRows}{13,004}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalTotalRows}{56,512}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalMavenCallEdges}{321,806}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalGradleCallEdges}{64,242}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalTotalCallEdges}{386,048}\n\n \\newcommand{\\EvalMavenRuntimeMin}{9}\n \\newcommand{\\EvalMavenRuntimeAvg}{88}\n \\newcommand{\\EvalMavenRuntimeMax}{275}\n \\newcommand{\\EvalGradleRuntimeMin}{22}\n \\newcommand{\\EvalGradleRuntimeAvg}{42}\n \\newcommand{\\EvalGradleRuntimeMax}{68}\n \\newcommand{\\EvalTotalRuntimeMin}{9}\n \\newcommand{\\EvalTotalRuntimeAvg}{65}\n \\newcommand{\\EvalTotalRuntimeMax}{275}\n\n\n\n\n% RQ2: bytecode targets, source joins, abstentions, and non-source targets.\n\\newcommand{\\EvalMavenTargetUri}{321,806}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalGradleTargetUri}{64,242}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalTotalTargetUri}{386,048}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalMavenMethodUri}{260,096}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalGradleMethodUri}{34,146}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalTotalMethodUri}{294,242}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalMavenProjectAbstentions}{4,257}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalGradleProjectAbstentions}{2,244}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalTotalProjectAbstentions}{6,501}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalMavenRecognizedProjectTargets}{264,353}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalGradleRecognizedProjectTargets}{36,390}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalTotalRecognizedProjectTargets}{300,743}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalMavenNonProjectEdges}{57,453}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalGradleNonProjectEdges}{27,852}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalTotalNonProjectEdges}{85,305}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalMavenProjectSourceRate}{98.4\\%}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalGradleProjectSourceRate}{93.8\\%}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalTotalProjectSourceRate}{97.8\\%}\n\n% RQ3: manual output-quality audit.\n\\newcommand{\\EvalAuditRecords}{200}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalAuditRepos}{10}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalAuditMethodIdentityPass}{200}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalAuditDocRefsPass}{198}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalAuditCallContextPass}{200}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalAuditInheritdocPass}{200}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalAuditOverallPass}{198}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalAuditPassRate}{99\\%}\n\\newcommand{\\EvalAuditAgreement}{100\\%}\n\n\n\n\\lstset{\n basicstyle=\\ttfamily\\footnotesize,\n columns=fullflexible,\n keepspaces=true,\n showstringspaces=false,\n breaklines=true,\n frame=single\n}\n\n% \\title{\\tool: Static Method-Context Extraction for Java}\n\n\\title{\\tool: A Tool for Code-Context Mining and Automated Dataset Generation}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\n\n\\author{Alessandro Botta}\n\\email{alessandro.botta@utdallas.edu}\n% \\orcid{1234-5678-9012}\n% \\correspondingauthor\n\\affiliation{%\n \\institution{University of Texas at Dallas}\n \\city{Richardson}\n \\state{Texas}\n \\country{USA}\n}\n\n\\author{Shiven Garisa}\n\\email{garisas77@gmail.com}\n\\affiliation{%\n \\institution{Heritage High School}\n \\city{Frisco}\n \\state{Texas}\n \\country{USA}\n}\n\n\\author{Jaya Vardhini Akurathi}\n\\email{jxa220064@utdallas.edu}\n\\affiliation{%\n \\institution{University of Texas at Dallas}\n \\city{Richardson}\n \\state{Texas}\n \\country{USA}\n}\n\n\\author{Ahsanul Ameen Sabit}\n\\email{ahsanulameen.sabit@utdallas.edu}\n\\affiliation{%\n \\institution{University of Texas at Dallas}\n \\city{Richardson}\n \\state{Texas}\n \\country{USA}\n}\n\n\\author{Trey Woodlief}\n\\email{woodlief@wm.edu}\n\\affiliation{%\n \\institution{William \\& Mary}\n \\city{Williamsburg}\n \\state{Virginia}\n \\country{USA}\n}\n\n\\author{Soneya Binta Hossain}\n\\email{sbhossain@utdallas.edu}\n\\affiliation{%\n \\institution{University of Texas at Dallas}\n \\city{Richardson}\n \\state{Texas}\n \\country{USA}\n}\n\n\\begin{abstract}\nSoftware-engineering assistants often need method-level context beyond an\nisolated body, including enclosing-class information, documentation, callers,\ncallees, type hierarchy, and structural characteristics. Manually collecting\nthis context is time-consuming, inconsistent, and difficult to reproduce across\nlarge Java projects.\n\nWe present \\tool{}, a Java tool for \\underline{Co}de-\\underline{Co}ntext\n\\underline{M}ining and A\\underline{ut}omated Dataset Generation. \\tool{}\nextracts context for a focal method or generates datasets at class, package,\nor system scope. It discovers project structure, resolves build and classpath\ninformation, constructs a SootUp static call graph, and reconciles\nbytecode-level call edges with Spoon-based source extraction. Each method\nrecord combines source, class, documentation, call-graph, and metadata\ncontext, providing reproducible inputs for training and running learned\nsoftware-engineering techniques.\n\nThe key contribution is a reusable, task-independent pipeline that unifies\nbuild discovery, source extraction, call-graph construction,\nsource--bytecode reconciliation, and versioned JSON dataset generation. The\nresulting records can be consumed individually as context for a focal method or\ncollectively as datasets for documentation, explanation, testing, review,\nrepair, search, and program-comprehension workflows. We evaluate \\tool{} on\n\\EvalReposTotal{} real-world Java repositories evenly split between Maven and\nGradle. \\tool{} processed all \\EvalReposTotal{} repositories, emitting\n\\EvalTotalRows{} method-context records and \\EvalTotalCallEdges{} serialized\ncall edges. Among call edges whose bytecode targets belonged to project source,\n\\tool{} reconciled \\EvalTotalProjectSourceRate{} to source method identities.\nIn a manual audit of \\EvalAuditRecords{} randomly sampled methods across\n\\EvalAuditRepos{} systems, \\EvalAuditPassRate{} of generated context records passed all applicable correctness checks.\\\\\n\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Demo:} \\url{https://youtu.be/RCUzkCQjG30} \\\\\n\\textbf{Artifact:} \\url{https://github.com/assert-lab/CoCoMUT}\n\\end{abstract}\n\\begin{CCSXML}\n<ccs2012>\n <concept>\n <concept_id>10011007.10010940.10010992.10010998.10011000</concept_id>\n <concept_desc>Software and its engineering~Automated static analysis</concept_desc>\n <concept_significance>500</concept_significance>\n </concept>\n <concept>\n <concept_id>10011007.10011006.10011073</concept_id>\n <concept_desc>Software and its engineering~Software maintenance tools</concept_desc>\n <concept_significance>300</concept_significance>\n </concept>\n <concept>\n <concept_id>10011007.10011074.10011111.10003465</concept_id>\n <concept_desc>Software and its engineering~Software reverse engineering</concept_desc>\n <concept_significance>300</concept_significance>\n </concept>\n</ccs2012>\n\\end{CCSXML}\n\n\\ccsdesc[500]{Software and its engineering~Automated static analysis}\n\\ccsdesc[300]{Software and its engineering~Software maintenance tools}\n\\ccsdesc[300]{Software and its engineering~Software reverse engineering}\n\n\\keywords{code-context extraction, repository mining, program analysis,\nbytecode analysis, call-graph analysis, dataset generation}\n\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\\section{Introduction}\n\nMany software-engineering tasks require context beyond an isolated method\nbody. File-level context improves code summarization\naccuracy~\\cite{haque2020filecontext}, while test generation and program repair\nuse information about the focal method, enclosing type, and related program\nelements~\\cite{tufano2022methods2test,li2020dlfix,hossain2025togll,hossain2025doc2oracll,hossain2024deep}.\nAt scale, this context is difficult to construct because it is spread across\nsource code, in-source documentation, type hierarchies, dependencies, and\ncompiled bytecode. Researchers therefore build task-specific extraction\npipelines with different assumptions about method identity, dependency\nresolution, and context boundaries~\\cite{hossain2025togll,hossain2025doc2oracll,schaefer2024empirical,chen2024chatunitest,wang2024hits,zhang2023repocoder,zhang2024autocoderover},\nhindering comparison and reproducibility~\\cite{liu2022reproducibility}.\n\nExisting source-analysis and call-graph frameworks provide useful building\nblocks, but reusable method-context extraction still requires resolving\nproject-specific builds and classpaths, combining source- and bytecode-level\nanalyses, reconciling program identities, and defining a consistent output\nschema. Java adds further complications: calls to overridable methods,\nincluding interface methods, can have multiple runtime targets, forcing static\nanalyses to balance precision and scalability~\\cite{sundaresan2000virtual};\noverloading, nested and anonymous types, inheritance, and generics complicate\nstable method identification.\n\nWe present \\tool{}, a Java tool for automated code-context mining and dataset\ngeneration shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:pipeline}. Given a project and selection scope, \\tool{} discovers project\nstructure, resolves build and classpath information, builds a Spoon source\nmodel~\\cite{spoon}, constructs a SootUp static call graph~\\cite{sootup}, and\nreconciles bytecode call targets with source-level method identities. It emits\none versioned \\jsonl{} record per selected method~\\cite{jsonlines}, combining\nmethod identity, implementation, enclosing-type context, documentation,\ncallers and callees, hierarchy information, structural metrics, provenance,\nand metadata. Records can be inspected individually or processed as\ndatasets over methods, classes, packages, or entire systems.\n\nWe evaluate \\tool{} on \\EvalReposTotal{} real-world Java repositories, split\nevenly between Maven and Gradle projects. We measure extraction robustness,\nsource--bytecode reconciliation for project call edges, and output quality\nunder manual audit.\n\nIn summary, this paper contributes:\n\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item \\textbf{A task-independent method-context schema} that unifies\n stable method identity, implementation, local class context, field\n accesses, overload and sibling-method context, structured and linked\n Javadoc, type hierarchy, caller/callee context, structural metrics, and\n provenance/confidence metadata. See Table~\\ref{tab:record-context}.\n\n \\item \\textbf{An automated Java context-mining pipeline} integrating\n project discovery, build/classpath resolution, Spoon source analysis,\n SootUp call-graph construction, source--bytecode reconciliation,\n configurable method selection, and versioned \\jsonl{} generation.\n\n \\item \\textbf{An empirical evaluation} on \\EvalReposTotal{} Java\n repositories, measuring extraction robustness, emitted records, call-graph\n availability, project-source reconciliation, and abstention categories.\n\n \\item \\textbf{A replication package} with the tool, documentation,\n evaluation artifacts, and reproduction information.\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\n\n\\section{\\tool{} Workflow}\n\nFigure~\\ref{fig:pipeline} summarizes the \\tool{} workflow. \\tool{}\ncombines two views of the same project: source declarations modeled by\n\\spoon{} and bytecode methods modeled by \\sootup{}. It reconciles these views\nthrough stable method identities and emits one method-context record per\nselected method. The workflow has four phases; phase~2 builds the source and\nbytecode views.\n\n\\begin{description}\n \\item[\\textbf{1. Input and extraction request.}]\n The user provides a Java project and an extraction request, such as a\n source set, package, type, method filter, or exact focal method.\n\n \\item[\\textbf{2a. CoCoMUT source model.}]\n \\tool{} uses \\spoon{} to build a source model and projects it into a\n CoCoMUT source index containing stable method URIs, Javadoc, annotations,\n hierarchy information, and other source context.\n\n \\item[\\textbf{2b. CoCoMUT bytecode analysis.}]\n \\tool{} analyzes compiled project bytecode and dependency artifacts with\n \\sootup{}, constructing a CHA or RTA call graph with bytecode-level caller\n and callee edges.\n\n \\item[\\textbf{3. Source--bytecode reconciliation.}]\n \\tool{} reconciles \\spoon{} source-method keys with \\sootup{} bytecode\n signatures. Unique matches receive a source \\texttt{method\\_uri},\n ambiguous matches retain candidate URIs, and unmatched bytecode targets\n remain visible through \\texttt{target\\_uri}.\n\n \\item[\\textbf{4. Versioned outputs and diagnostics.}]\n \\tool{} serializes method-context records as versioned \\jsonl{} and emits\n an extraction report, failure artifacts, and summary statistics.\n\\end{description}\n\n\\input{figures/pipeline}\n\n\\subsection{Project Analysis and Execution Modes}\n\n\\tool{} first identifies the project layout and build metadata needed for\nsource parsing and bytecode analysis. For Maven and Gradle projects, \\tool{}\ncan build fresh bytecode or consume project artifacts already present in\nconventional layouts. The pipeline requires compiled bytecode for the source\nproject; partial bytecode, e.g., from compilation failures, is insufficient.\nWe leave partial-bytecode extraction to future work.\n\n\\tool{} does not run project tests or application entry points directly.\nHowever, Maven and Gradle builds may execute repository-controlled plugins and\nscripts, so untrusted repositories should be analyzed in an isolated\nenvironment.\n\n\\subsection{Method Selection and Stable Identity}\n\nAfter project analysis, \\tool{} opens one source-analysis session and\nenumerates source methods and constructors. It maintains two sets: the\n\\emph{analysis universe}, containing all discovered source methods for identity\nresolution, and the \\emph{focal set}, containing only methods selected for\noutput. Each source method receives a canonical URI of the form: %This separation ensures that narrowing the output scope does not change whether edges to other project methods can be recognized. \n\n\\begin{center}\n\\small\n\\path{src/main/java/p/Foo.java#p.Foo.parse(java.lang.String):int}\n\\end{center}\n\nThe URI combines repository-relative source location, qualified declaring type,\nmethod or constructor name, erased parameter types, and erased return type. It\ndistinguishes overloads, nested types, generic erasures, and constructors, and\nis also used for exact method selection. Type and package targets use the same\n\\texttt{path\\#symbol} convention.\n\n\\subsection{Source-Level Context Extraction}\n\n\\tool{} uses \\spoon{} as its source-code front end~\\cite{spoon}. \\spoon{}\nparses Java source into a typed \\texttt{CtModel} containing program elements\nsuch as types, methods, constructors, fields, references, statements, and\ncomments.\n\n\\tool{} builds this model once per request and projects it into\nframework-independent \\texttt{SourceMethod} and \\texttt{SourceContext} records.\nA request-local index maps stable CoCoMUT URIs to source records and their\ncorresponding \\spoon{} \\texttt{CtExecutable}s, qualified type names to\n\\spoon{} types, and declaring types to their methods and fields. This\nprojection establishes stable source identity by normalizing source-level and\nerased Java types, distinguishing overloads and constructors, handling nested\ndeclarations, preserving source positions, and classifying methods by source\nset.\n\nDocumentation parsing follows the standard Javadoc syntax defined by the\nOracle/JDK documentation-comment specification~\\cite{javadoc17}. \\tool{} uses\n\\spoon{}'s \\texttt{spoon-javadoc} module for block and inline tags. For\nprogram-element references such as \\texttt{@see} and \\texttt{\\{@link ...\\}},\n\\tool{} maps typed \\spoon{} references to CoCoMUT method, field, or type URIs\nwhen the target belongs to the analyzed project.\n\nFor \\texttt{\\{@inheritDoc\\}}, \\tool{} does not silently merge inherited text\ninto the child method's structured tags. Instead, it reports whether inherited\ndocumentation candidates exist and exposes those candidates explicitly.\n\n\\subsection{Call-Graph Construction and Source--Bytecode Reconciliation}\n\n\\tool{} builds a static call graph from compiled project bytecode using\n\\sootup{}. Users can select rapid type analysis (RTA), the default, or\nclass-hierarchy analysis (CHA).\n\n\\sootup{} and \\spoon{} identify methods at different levels: \\sootup{} reports\nbytecode signatures, while \\spoon{} reports source declarations. These\nidentities can differ because of generic type erasure, synthetic methods, and\nother source-to-bytecode transformations. Therefore, \\tool{} links a bytecode\ntarget to a source method only when the match is unique.\n\nFor each caller/callee relation reported by \\sootup{}, \\tool{} records the\n related method's bytecode identity as \\texttt{target\\_uri}.\n and then attempts to add a source-level\n\\texttt{method\\_uri}. Multiple compatible source declarations produce an\nexplicit ambiguity with candidate URIs; no compatible source declaration\nleaves \\texttt{method\\_uri} empty.\n\nThis separation prevents false source links. External targets and\ncompiler-generated targets, such as synthetic bridge methods or lambda\nartifacts, keep their bytecode identity, while \\texttt{method\\_uri} appears\nonly for project-source targets that \\tool{} resolves deterministically.\n\n\\subsection{Output and Metadata}\n\n\\tool{} writes one deterministic \\jsonl{} record for each focal method.\nTable~\\ref{tab:record-context} summarizes the five context families in each\nrecord: identity/source, local class, documentation, call-graph, and\nmetadata. Full schema details are available at\n\\url{https://github.com/assert-lab/CoCoMUT/tree/main/schemas}. Output filenames\ninclude a request fingerprint, so different extraction configurations produce\ndistinct artifacts. By default, \\tool{} writes artifacts outside the analyzed\nrepository, avoiding target-project pollution and simplifying repeated\nexperiments.\n\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\caption{Context families emitted in a \\tool{} method record; full schema can be found at~\\cite{cocomut}}\n\\label{tab:record-context}\n\\small\n\\begin{tabular}{@{}p{0.27\\linewidth}p{0.65\\linewidth}@{}}\n\\toprule\nFamily & Examples \\\\\n\\midrule\nIdentity and source &\nStable URI, signature, erased types, source set, position, parameters,\nannotations, throws, code, LOC, cyclomatic complexity. \\\\\nLocal class context &\nClass Javadoc, hierarchy, sibling methods, overload group, field reads and\nwrites. \\\\\nDocumentation context &\nStructured Javadoc, \\texttt{@param}, \\texttt{@return}, \\texttt{@throws},\n\\texttt{@since}, deprecation text, inline links, \\texttt{@see},\ninherited-documentation candidates. \\\\\nCall context &\nCaller/callee edges, bytecode \\texttt{target\\_uri}, source\n\\texttt{method\\_uri}, raw signature, target kind, nested project-method\ncontext when available. \\\\\nProvenance and confidence &\nSchema version, selection scope, source backend, call-graph algorithm,\nresolution status, unresolved reason, context confidence. \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\subsection{Implementation}\n\n\\tool{} is implemented as a Maven multi-module Java project and exposes the\npipeline through a CLI, a shaded executable JAR, and a Java service API. It\nbuilds on \\spoon{} and \\texttt{spoon-\\allowbreak javadoc} for typed source and\ndocumentation models, \\sootup{} for bytecode loading and call graphs, and\nJackson for serializing versioned JSON records~\\cite{spoon,sootup,jackson_repo}.\n\nThe evaluated release runs on JDK~17 or newer. Source parsing is configured\nfor Java source levels up to Java~25, while call-graph construction is limited\nby the bytecode versions supported by \\sootup{}, up to Java~21 in the evaluated\nrelease. %Projects outside these bounds are reported through failure and provenance metadata rather than silently downgraded to source-only results.\n\n\n\\section{Evaluation}\n\\label{sec:evaluation}\nWe evaluate \\tool{} as a context extraction tool on \\EvalReposTotal{} real-world Java\nrepositories: \\EvalReposMaven{} Maven and \\EvalReposGradle{} Gradle. Experiments\nran on a Linux x86-64 consumer machine with OpenJDK~17.0.19, Maven~3.9.16, and\nGradle~9.5.1. Each repository was checked out once and analyzed with\nmain-source, all-method scope, RTA, and build execution enabled. The\nreproduction script records the environment, parses extraction reports,\nvalidates method-context rows, and counts serialized caller/callee entries. \\\\\n\nWe ran the following command for all systems.\n\n\\begin{lstlisting}[basicstyle=\\ttfamily\\scriptsize,aboveskip=2pt,belowskip=2pt]\n./bin/cocomut --project <project> --scope all \\\n--source-set main --call-graph rta \\\n--allow-build --output-dir <output>\n\\end{lstlisting}\n\n\nThe evaluation addresses three research questions:\n\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item[\\textbf{RQ1.}] \\textbf{Build-ecosystem robustness.}\n Can \\tool{} produce method-context records across Maven and Gradle projects?\n\n \\item[\\textbf{RQ2.}] \\textbf{Source--bytecode reconciliation.}\n How often can \\tool{} deterministically link bytecode call targets to\n source-level project methods, and when does it abstain?\n\n \\item[\\textbf{RQ3.}] \\textbf{Output quality.}\n Do manually audited records contain the intended method identity,\n documentation references, caller/callee context, and inherited-documentation\n metadata?\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\n\n\n \\subsection{RQ1: Build-Ecosystem Robustness}\n\n \n \\begin{table}[h]\n \\centering\n \\caption{RQ1 results. B/BC/CG reports successful build, project bytecode\navailability, and call-graph availability. Runtime is min/avg/max across\nrepositories, in seconds.}\n \\label{tab:rq1-results}\n \\footnotesize\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n \\begin{tabular}{@{}lrrrrr>{\\centering\\arraybackslash}p{0.18\\columnwidth}@{}}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Build} & \\textbf{Repos} & \\textbf{B/BC/CG} &\n \\textbf{Meth.} & \\textbf{Rows} & \\textbf{Edges} & \\textbf{min/avg/max runtime} \\\\\n \\midrule\n Maven & \\EvalReposMaven{} &\n \\EvalMavenBuildSuccess{}/\\EvalMavenBytecodeAvailable{}/\\EvalMavenCallGraphAvailable{} &\n \\EvalMavenMethods{} & \\EvalMavenRows{} & \\EvalMavenCallEdges{} &\n \\EvalMavenRuntimeMin{}/\\EvalMavenRuntimeAvg{}/\\EvalMavenRuntimeMax{} s\\\\\n\n Gradle & \\EvalReposGradle{} &\n \\EvalGradleBuildSuccess{}/\\EvalGradleBytecodeAvailable{}/\\EvalGradleCallGraphAvailable{} &\n \\EvalGradleMethods{} & \\EvalGradleRows{} & \\EvalGradleCallEdges{} &\n \\EvalGradleRuntimeMin{}/\\EvalGradleRuntimeAvg{}/\\EvalGradleRuntimeMax{} s\\\\\n\n Total & \\EvalReposTotal{} &\n \\EvalTotalBuildSuccess{}/\\EvalTotalBytecodeAvailable{}/\\EvalTotalCallGraphAvailable{} &\n \\EvalTotalMethods{} & \\EvalTotalRows{} & \\EvalTotalCallEdges{} &\n \\EvalTotalRuntimeMin{}/\\EvalTotalRuntimeAvg{}/\\EvalTotalRuntimeMax{} s\\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n \\end{table}\n\n\nAs shown in Table~\\ref{tab:rq1-results}, \\tool{} completed the extraction\npipeline for all \\EvalReposTotal{} subjects: every repository built, exposed\nproject bytecode, produced a call graph, and emitted parseable method-context\n\\jsonl{}. In total, \\tool{} emitted \\EvalTotalRows{} method-context records and\n\\EvalTotalCallEdges{} serialized caller/callee entries.\n\n\n\n\\subsection{RQ2: Source--Bytecode Reconciliation}\n\n \\begin{table}[h]\n \\centering\n \\caption{RQ2 results. Every serialized caller/callee entry records a bytecode\n\\texttt{target\\_uri}. Project join counts entries linked to a source\n\\texttt{method\\_uri}; project abstention counts recognized project targets\nwithout a unique source match; non-source counts JDK, dependency, and\ncompiler-generated targets.}\n \\label{tab:rq2-results}\n \\footnotesize\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n \\begin{tabular}{@{}lrrrrr@{}}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Build} & \\textbf{Target URI} & \\textbf{Project join} &\n \\textbf{Project abst.} & \\textbf{Non-source} & \\textbf{Recon.} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n Maven & \\EvalMavenTargetUri{} & \\EvalMavenMethodUri{} &\n \\EvalMavenProjectAbstentions{} & \\EvalMavenNonProjectEdges{} &\n \\EvalMavenProjectSourceRate{} \\\\\n\n Gradle & \\EvalGradleTargetUri{} & \\EvalGradleMethodUri{} &\n \\EvalGradleProjectAbstentions{} & \\EvalGradleNonProjectEdges{} &\n \\EvalGradleProjectSourceRate{} \\\\\n\n Total & \\EvalTotalTargetUri{} & \\EvalTotalMethodUri{} &\n \\EvalTotalProjectAbstentions{} & \\EvalTotalNonProjectEdges{} &\n \\EvalTotalProjectSourceRate{} \\\\\n\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n \\end{table}\n\n\nEvery serialized caller/callee entry preserves the bytecode identity of the\nneighboring method as \\texttt{target\\_uri}. When that target belongs to project\nsource and has a unique source match, \\tool{} adds a source-level\n\\texttt{method\\_uri}. When no unique source declaration is found, \\tool{}\nabstains and preserves only the bytecode target. Non-source entries include JDK\ncalls, dependency calls, synthetic bridge methods, and \\texttt{invokedynamic}\nlambda artifacts.\n\nTable~\\ref{tab:rq2-results} shows that all \\EvalTotalTargetUri{} entries\npreserve a \\texttt{target\\_uri}. Among\n\\EvalTotalRecognizedProjectTargets{} recognized project targets, \\tool{} joins\n\\EvalTotalMethodUri{} to a source \\texttt{method\\_uri} and abstains on\n\\EvalTotalProjectAbstentions{}, yielding a \\EvalTotalProjectSourceRate{}\nreconciliation rate. Thus, \\tool{} attaches source identities to most recognized\nproject targets while avoiding unsupported source links.\n\n\n \\subsection{RQ3: Output Quality}\n\n \\begin{table}[h]\n \\centering\n \\caption{RQ3 manual audit sample by repository. SLOC counts production source\n lines under \\texttt{src/main/java}.}\n \\label{tab:rq3-results}\n \\footnotesize\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{5pt}\n \\begin{tabular}{@{}lrrrr@{}}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Repo} & \\textbf{SLOC} & \\textbf{Records} & \\textbf{Pass} & \\textbf{Rate} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\texttt{MultiPaper} & 6,206 & 5 & 5 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\texttt{JsonPath} & 10,305 & 7 & 7 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\texttt{moco} & 15,157 & 11 & 11 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\texttt{RichTextFX} & 12,076 & 11 & 11 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\texttt{mockito} & 22,580 & 15 & 15 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\texttt{jsoup} & 17,933 & 12 & 12 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\texttt{jedis} & 52,412 & 60 & 59 & 98.3\\% \\\\\n \\texttt{spring-cloud-gateway} & 27,146 & 16 & 16 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\texttt{graphhopper} & 63,322 & 15 & 15 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\texttt{fastjson2} & 179,175 & 48 & 47 & 97.9\\% \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\textbf{Total} & 406,312 & 200 & 198 & 99.0\\% \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n \\end{table}\n\n To assess output quality, we manually audited \\EvalAuditRecords{} method-context\n records sampled from \\EvalAuditRepos{} real-world repositories. The audited\n systems span small, medium, and large Java projects, from 6,206 to 179,175\n production SLOC and 406,312 SLOC in total.\n\n Two independent annotators inspected the same sampled records. A record passed\n only when all applicable checks passed, including method identity,\n documentation references, caller/callee context, and inherited-documentation\n metadata. The annotators agreed on all records, yielding 100.0\\% agreement and\n Cohen's $\\kappa=1.00$. After adjudication, 198 of 200 records passed, for a 99.0\\% overall pass rate.\n Method identity, caller/callee context, and inherited-documentation metadata\n passed for every audited record.\n\n\n\n\n\n\\section{Future Work}\n\nFuture work will evaluate whether \\tool{} records improve downstream tasks such\nas code explanation, documentation generation, test generation, code review, bug\nlocalization, and repair. We also plan to extend the analysis to richer handling\nof compiler-generated bytecode artifacts, generated sources, project-specific\nlayouts, and external dependency documentation. These extensions will preserve\n\\tool{}'s design principle: attach source identity only when it can be resolved\ndeterministically; otherwise, retain explicit bytecode identity and abstention\nmetadata.\n\n\\section{Conclusion}\n\nWe presented \\tool{}, a Java method-context extraction tool for reproducible\ncode-context mining and dataset generation. \\tool{} combines source analysis,\nbytecode call graphs, and stable method identities to emit versioned \\jsonl{}\nrecords containing source, documentation, structural, metadata, and\ncaller/callee context. In our \\EvalReposTotal{}-repository evaluation, \\tool{}\nproduced \\EvalTotalRows{} method-context records and \\EvalTotalCallEdges{}\nserialized caller/callee entries across Maven and Gradle projects. Every entry\npreserved a bytecode \\texttt{target\\_uri}; among recognized project-source\ntargets, \\tool{} reconciled \\EvalTotalMethodUri{} and abstained on\n\\EvalTotalProjectAbstentions{}, for a \\EvalTotalProjectSourceRate{}\nreconciliation rate. A \\EvalAuditRecords{}-record manual audit found that 99.0\\% of the records\n passed the applicable output-quality checks.\n \n\nWe believe, these results position \\tool{} as a shared, reproducible foundation for extracting method-level context for LLM-based task automation and for evaluating progress in context-aware software engineering.\n\n\n\n\n\\section{Data Availability}\n\\tool{} is Apache~2.0 open source; code and documentation are available at~\\cite{cocomut}, the demonstration video is available at~\\cite{tool_demo}, and the archived tool version at the time of submission is available at~\\cite{cocomut_zenodo_2026}.\n\n\\balance\n\\bibliographystyle{ACM-Reference-Format}\n\\bibliography{main}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: acmart.cls\n================================================\n%%\n%% This is file `acmart.cls',\n%% generated with the docstrip utility.\n%%\n%% The original source files were:\n%%\n%% acmart.dtx (with options: `class')\n%% \n%% IMPORTANT NOTICE:\n%% \n%% For the copyright see the source file.\n%% \n%% Any modified versions of this file must be renamed\n%% with new filenames distinct from acmart.cls.\n%% \n%% For distribution of the original source see the terms\n%% for copying and modification in the file acmart.dtx.\n%% \n%% This generated file may be distributed as long as the\n%% original source files, as listed above, are part of the\n%% same distribution. (The sources need not necessarily be\n%% in the same archive or directory.)\n%% \\CharacterTable\n%% {Upper-case \\A\\B\\C\\D\\E\\F\\G\\H\\I\\J\\K\\L\\M\\N\\O\\P\\Q\\R\\S\\T\\U\\V\\W\\X\\Y\\Z\n%% Lower-case \\a\\b\\c\\d\\e\\f\\g\\h\\i\\j\\k\\l\\m\\n\\o\\p\\q\\r\\s\\t\\u\\v\\w\\x\\y\\z\n%% Digits \\0\\1\\2\\3\\4\\5\\6\\7\\8\\9\n%% Exclamation \\! Double quote \\\" Hash (number) \\#\n%% Dollar \\$ Percent \\% Ampersand \\&\n%% Acute accent \\' Left paren \\( Right paren \\)\n%% Asterisk \\* Plus \\+ Comma \\,\n%% Minus \\- Point \\. Solidus \\/\n%% Colon \\: Semicolon \\; Less than \\<\n%% Equals \\= Greater than \\> Question mark \\?\n%% Commercial at \\@ Left bracket \\[ Backslash \\\\\n%% Right bracket \\] Circumflex \\^ Underscore \\_\n%% Grave accent \\` Left brace \\{ Vertical bar \\|\n%% Right brace \\} Tilde \\~}\n\n\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesClass{acmart}\n[2025/08/27 v2.16 Typesetting articles for the Association for Computing Machinery]\n\\def\\@classname{acmart}\n\\InputIfFileExists{acmart-preload-hook.tex}{%\n \\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{%\n I am loading acmart-preload-hook.tex. You are fully responsible\n for any problems from now on.}}{}\n\\RequirePackage{xkeyval}\n\\RequirePackage{xstring}\n\\RequirePackage{iftex}\n\\define@choicekey*+{\\@classname.cls}{format}[\\ACM@format\\ACM@format@nr]{%\n manuscript, acmsmall, acmlarge, acmtog, sigconf, siggraph,\n sigplan, sigchi, sigchi-a, acmengage, acmcp}[manuscript]{}{%\n \\ClassError{\\@classname}{The option format must be manuscript,\n acmsmall, acmlarge, acmtog, sigconf, siggraph,\n sigplan, sigchi or sigchi-a}}\n\\def\\@DeclareACMFormat#1{\\DeclareOptionX{#1}{\\setkeys{\\@classname.cls}{format=#1}}}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{manuscript}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{acmsmall}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{acmlarge}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{acmtog}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{sigconf}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{siggraph}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{sigplan}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{sigchi}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{sigchi-a}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{acmengage}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{acmcp}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{format}\n\\define@boolkey+{\\@classname.cls}[@ACM@]{screen}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@screen\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using screen mode}%\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Not using screen mode}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option screen can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{screen=false}\n\\define@boolkey+{\\@classname.cls}[@ACM@]{urlbreakonhyphens}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@urlbreakonhyphens\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using breaking urls on hyphens}%\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Not breaking urls on hyphens}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option urlbreakonhyphens can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{urlbreakonhyphens=true}\n\\define@boolkey+{\\@classname.cls}[@ACM@]{acmthm}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@acmthm\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Requiring acmthm}%\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Suppressing acmthm}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option acmthm can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{acmthm=true}\n\\define@boolkey+{\\@classname.cls}[@ACM@]{review}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@review\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using review mode}%\n \\AtBeginDocument{\\@ACM@printfoliostrue}%\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Not using review mode}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option review can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{review=false}\n\\define@boolkey+{\\@classname.cls}[@ACM@]{authorversion}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@authorversion\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using authorversion mode}%\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Not using authorversion mode}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option authorversion can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{authorversion=false}\n\\define@boolkey+{\\@classname.cls}[@ACM@]{nonacm}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using nonacm mode}%\n \\AtBeginDocument{\\@ACM@printacmreffalse}%\n % in 'nonacm' mode we disable the \"ACM Reference Format\"\n % printing by default, but this can be re-enabled by the\n % user using \\settopmatter{printacmref=true}\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Not using nonacm mode}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option nonacm can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{nonacm=false}\n\\define@boolkey+{\\@classname.cls}[@ACM@]{balance}[true]{}{%\n \\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option balance can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{balance}\n\\define@boolkey+{\\@classname.cls}[@ACM@]{pbalance}[true]{}{%\n \\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option pbalance can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{pbalance=false}\n\\define@boolkey+{\\@classname.cls}[@ACM@]{natbib}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@natbib\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Explicitly selecting natbib mode}%\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Explicitly deselecting natbib mode}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option natbib can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{natbib=true}\n\\define@boolkey+{\\@classname.cls}[@ACM@]{anonymous}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using anonymous mode}%\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Not using anonymous mode}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option anonymous can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{anonymous=false}\n\\define@boolkey+{\\@classname.cls}[@ACM@]{timestamp}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@timestamp\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using timestamp mode}%\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Not using timestamp mode}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option timestamp can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{timestamp=false}\n\\define@boolkey+{\\@classname.cls}[@ACM@]{authordraft}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@authordraft\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using authordraft mode}%\n \\@ACM@timestamptrue\n \\@ACM@reviewtrue\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Not using authordraft mode}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option authordraft can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{authordraft=false}\n\\def\\ACM@fontsize{}\n\\DeclareOptionX{8pt}{\\edef\\ACM@fontsize{\\CurrentOption}}\n\\DeclareOptionX{9pt}{\\edef\\ACM@fontsize{\\CurrentOption}}\n\\DeclareOptionX{10pt}{\\edef\\ACM@fontsize{\\CurrentOption}}\n\\DeclareOptionX{11pt}{\\edef\\ACM@fontsize{\\CurrentOption}}\n\\DeclareOptionX{12pt}{\\edef\\ACM@fontsize{\\CurrentOption}}\n\\def\\ACM@languages{}\n\\DeclareOptionX{language}{%\n \\ifx\\ACM@languages\\@empty\n \\gdef\\ACM@languages{english}\\fi\n \\g@addto@macro\\ACM@languages{, #1}}\n\\DeclareOptionX{draft}{\\PassOptionsToClass{\\CurrentOption}{amsart}}\n\\DeclareOptionX{*}{\\PassOptionsToClass{\\CurrentOption}{amsart}}\n\\ProcessOptionsX\n\\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Using format \\ACM@format, number \\ACM@format@nr}\n\\newif\\if@ACM@manuscript\n\\newif\\if@ACM@journal\n\\newif\\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip\n\\newif\\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip@or@tog\n\\newif\\if@ACM@sigchiamode\n\\newif\\if@ACM@engage\n\\@ACM@engagefalse\n\\newif\\if@ACM@acmcp\n\\@ACM@acmcpfalse\n\\ifnum\\ACM@format@nr=5\\relax % siggraph\n\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{%\n The format siggraph is now obsolete.\\MessageBreak\n I am switching to sigconf.}\n \\setkeys{\\@classname.cls}{format=sigconf}\n\\fi\n\\ifnum\\ACM@format@nr=7\\relax % sigchi\n\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{%\n The format sigchi is now obsolete.\\MessageBreak\n I am switching to sigconf.}\n \\setkeys{\\@classname.cls}{format=sigconf}\n\\fi\n\\ifnum\\ACM@format@nr=8\\relax % sigchi\n\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{%\n ACM SIGCHI has retired the SIGCHI-A template\\MessageBreak\n effective immediately. ACM is keeping this template\\MessageBreak\n option available to authors who are working on legacy\\MessageBreak\n documents only. ACM will not, under any circumstances,\\MessageBreak\n accept documents in this format for publication and\\MessageBreak\n will not offer technical support to the authors who use\\MessageBreak\n this template.\\MessageBreak\n ACM SIGCHI is directing Conference leaders and\\MessageBreak\n authors to publish their articles using the SIGCONF\\MessageBreak\n template call.}\n\\fi\n\\ifnum\\ACM@format@nr=0\\relax\n \\@ACM@manuscripttrue\n\\else\n \\@ACM@manuscriptfalse\n\\fi\n\\@ACM@sigchiamodefalse\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n \\@ACM@journaltrue\n\\or % acmsmall\n \\@ACM@journaltrue\n\\or % acmlarge\n \\@ACM@journaltrue\n\\or % acmtog\n \\@ACM@journaltrue\n \\@ACM@journal@bibstrip@or@togtrue\n\\or % sigconf\n \\@ACM@journalfalse\n\\or % siggraph\n \\@ACM@journalfalse\n \\or % sigplan\n \\@ACM@journalfalse\n \\or % sigchi\n \\@ACM@journalfalse\n\\or % sigchi-a\n \\@ACM@journalfalse\n \\@ACM@sigchiamodetrue\n\\or % acmengage\n \\@ACM@journalfalse\n \\@ACM@engagetrue\n\\or % acmcp\n \\@ACM@journaltrue\n \\@ACM@acmcptrue\n \\AtBeginDocument{\\@ACM@printacmreffalse}%\n\\fi\n\\if@ACM@journal\n \\@ACM@journal@bibstriptrue\n \\@ACM@journal@bibstrip@or@togtrue\n\\else\n \\@ACM@journal@bibstripfalse\n\\fi\n\\ifx\\ACM@fontsize\\@empty\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{9pt}%\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{10pt}%\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{10pt}%\n \\or % acmtog\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{9pt}%\n \\or % sigconf\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{9pt}%\n \\or % siggraph\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{9pt}%\n \\or % sigplan\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{10pt}%\n \\or % sigchi\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{9pt}%\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{10pt}%\n \\or % acmengage\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{10pt}%\n \\or % acmcp\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{9pt}%\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Using fontsize \\ACM@fontsize}\n\\LoadClass[\\ACM@fontsize, reqno]{amsart}\n\\RequirePackage{microtype}\n\\RequirePackage{etoolbox}\n\\RequirePackage{booktabs}\n\\RequirePackage{refcount}\n\\RequirePackage{totpages}\n\\RequirePackage{environ}\n\\if@ACM@manuscript\n\\RequirePackage{setspace}\n\\onehalfspacing\n\\fi\n\\if@ACM@acmcp\n\\RequirePackage{framed}\n\\RequirePackage{zref-savepos, zref-user}\n\\fi\n\\newdimen\\@ACM@acmcp@delta\n\\@ACM@acmcp@delta=0pt\\relax\n\\if@ACM@natbib\n \\RequirePackage{natbib}\n \\renewcommand{\\bibsection}{%\n \\section*{\\refname}%\n \\phantomsection\\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\\refname}%\n }\n \\renewcommand{\\bibfont}{\\bibliofont}\n \\renewcommand\\setcitestyle[1]{\n \\@for\\@tempa:=#1\\do\n {\\def\\@tempb{round}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\renewcommand\\NAT@open{(}\\renewcommand\\NAT@close{)}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{square}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\renewcommand\\NAT@open{[}\\renewcommand\\NAT@close{]}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{angle}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\renewcommand\\NAT@open{$<$}\\renewcommand\\NAT@close{$>$}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{curly}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\renewcommand\\NAT@open{\\{}\\renewcommand\\NAT@close{\\}}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{semicolon}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\renewcommand\\NAT@sep{;}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{colon}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\renewcommand\\NAT@sep{;}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{comma}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\renewcommand\\NAT@sep{,}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{authoryear}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\NAT@numbersfalse\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{numbers}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\NAT@numberstrue\\NAT@superfalse\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{super}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\NAT@numberstrue\\NAT@supertrue\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{nobibstyle}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\let\\bibstyle=\\@gobble\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{bibstyle}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\let\\bibstyle=\\@citestyle\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{sort}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\def\\NAT@sort{\\@ne}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{nosort}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\def\\NAT@sort{\\z@}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{compress}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\def\\NAT@cmprs{\\@ne}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{nocompress}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\def\\NAT@cmprs{\\z@}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{sort&compress}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\def\\NAT@sort{\\@ne}\\def\\NAT@cmprs{\\@ne}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{mcite}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\let\\NAT@merge\\@ne\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{merge}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\@ifnum{\\NAT@merge<\\tw@}{\\let\\NAT@merge\\tw@}{}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{elide}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\@ifnum{\\NAT@merge<\\thr@@}{\\let\\NAT@merge\\thr@@}{}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{longnamesfirst}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\NAT@longnamestrue\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{nonamebreak}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\def\\NAT@nmfmt#1{\\mbox{\\NAT@up#1}}\\fi\n \\expandafter\\NAT@find@eq\\@tempa=\\relax\\@nil\n \\if\\@tempc\\relax\\else\n \\expandafter\\NAT@rem@eq\\@tempc\n \\def\\@tempb{open}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\xdef\\NAT@open{\\@tempc}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{close}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\xdef\\NAT@close{\\@tempc}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{aysep}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\xdef\\NAT@aysep{\\@tempc}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{yysep}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\xdef\\NAT@yrsep{\\@tempc}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{notesep}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\xdef\\NAT@cmt{\\@tempc}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{citesep}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\xdef\\NAT@sep{\\@tempc}\\fi\n \\fi\n }%\n \\NAT@@setcites\n }\n \\renewcommand\\citestyle[1]{%\n \\ifcsname bibstyle@#1\\endcsname%\n \\csname bibstyle@#1\\endcsname\\let\\bibstyle\\@gobble%\n \\else%\n \\@latex@error{Undefined `#1' citestyle}%\n \\fi\n }%\n\\fi\n\\newcommand{\\bibstyle@acmauthoryear}{%\n \\setcitestyle{%\n authoryear,%\n open={[},close={]},citesep={;},%\n aysep={},yysep={,},%\n notesep={, }}}\n\\newcommand{\\bibstyle@acmnumeric}{%\n \\setcitestyle{%\n numbers,sort&compress,%\n open={[},close={]},citesep={,},%\n notesep={, }}}\n\\if@ACM@natbib\n\\citestyle{acmnumeric}\n\\fi\n\\if@ACM@journal\n \\renewcommand\\keywordsname{Additional Key Words and Phrases}%\n\\else\n \\renewcommand\\keywordsname{Keywords}%\n\\fi\n\\if@ACM@engage\n \\renewcommand\\abstractname{Synopsis}%\n\\fi\n\\ifx\\ACM@languages\\@empty\n\\else\n \\RequirePackage[\\ACM@languages]{babel}%\n \\addto\\captionsenglish{%\n \\if@ACM@journal\n \\renewcommand\\keywordsname{Additional Key Words and Phrases}%\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\keywordsname{Keywords}%\n \\fi\n \\renewcommand\\acksname{Acknowledgements}%\n \\if@ACM@engage\n \\renewcommand\\abstractname{Synopsis}%\n \\fi\n }%\n \\addto\\captionsfrench{%\n \\if@ACM@journal\n \\renewcommand\\keywordsname{Mots Clés et Phrases Supplémentaires}%\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\keywordsname{Mots clés}%\n \\fi\n \\renewcommand\\acksname{Remerciements}%\n }%\n \\addto\\captionsgerman{%\n \\if@ACM@journal\n \\renewcommand\\keywordsname{Zusätzliche Schlagwörter und Phrasen}%\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\keywordsname{Schlagwörter}%\n \\fi\n \\renewcommand\\acksname{Danksagungen}%\n }%\n \\addto\\captionsspanish{%\n \\if@ACM@journal\n \\renewcommand\\keywordsname{Palabras y Frases Claves Adicionales}%\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\keywordsname{Palabras claves}%\n \\fi\n \\renewcommand\\acksname{Expresiones de gratitud}%\n }%\n\\fi\n\\newcommand\\ACM@lang@check[1]{%\n \\ifx\\ACM@languages\\@empty\\relax\n \\ClassError{\\@classname}{%\n Command \\string#1 \\MessageBreak is used in monlingual document}{%\n You used a command (\\string#1) \\MessageBreak\n that does not have a meaning \\MessageBreak\n unless are languages are defined. \\MessageBreak\n Please choose the languages in \\string\\documentclass\n \\MessageBreak\n (e.g. \\string\\documentclass[languages={french, english}]{acmart}),\n \\MessageBreak\n or delete the command.}%\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@translatedtitle{}\n\\newcommand\\translatedtitle[2]{\\ACM@lang@check{\\translatedtitle}%\n\\g@addto@macro\\@translatedtitle{\\par\\foreignlanguage{#1}{#2}}}\n\\def\\@translatedsubtitle{}\n\\newcommand\\translatedsubtitle[2]{\\ACM@lang@check{\\translatedsubtitle}%\n\\g@addto@macro\\@translatedsubtitle{\\par\\foreignlanguage{#1}{#2}}}\n\\def\\@translatedkeywords{}\n\\newcommand\\translatedkeywords[2]{\\ACM@lang@check{\\translatedkeywords}%\n\\g@addto@macro\\@translatedkeywords{\\@mktranslatedkeywords{#1}{#2}}}\n\\def\\@translatedabstracts{}\n\\newenvironment{translatedabstract}[1]{\\Collect@Body\n \\@savetranslatedabstract\\@mktranslatedabstract{#1}}{}\n\\long\\def\\@savetranslatedabstract#1{\\if@ACM@maketitle@typeset\n \\ClassError{\\@classname}{Abstract must be defined before maketitle\n command. Please move it!}\\fi\n \\ACM@lang@check{translatedabstract}%\n \\g@addto@macro\\@translatedabstracts{\\bgroup#1\\egroup}}\n\\def\\@startsection#1#2#3#4#5#6{%\n \\if@noskipsec \\leavevmode \\fi\n \\par\n \\@tempskipa #4\\relax\n \\@afterindenttrue\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa <\\z@\n \\@tempskipa -\\@tempskipa \\@afterindentfalse\n \\fi\n \\if@nobreak\n \\everypar{}%\n \\else\n \\addpenalty\\@secpenalty\\addvspace\\@tempskipa\n \\fi\n \\@ifstar\n {\\@ssect{#3}{#4}{#5}{#6}}%\n {\\@dblarg{\\@sect{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}{#5}{#6}}}}\n\\def\\@sect#1#2#3#4#5#6[#7]#8{%\n \\edef\\@toclevel{\\ifnum#2=\\@m 0\\else\\number#2\\fi}%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth\n \\let\\@svsec\\@empty\n \\else\n \\refstepcounter{#1}%\n \\protected@edef\\@svsec{\\@seccntformat{#1}\\relax}%\n \\fi\n \\@tempskipa #5\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n \\begingroup\n #6{%\n \\@hangfrom{\\hskip #3\\relax\\@svsec}%\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M #8\\@@par}%\n \\endgroup\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\@tochangmeasure{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}%\n \\fi\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}%\n \\fi\n #7}%\n \\else\n \\def\\@svsechd{%\n #6{\\hskip #3\\relax\n \\@svsec #8}%\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\@tochangmeasure{\\csname the#1\\endcsname\\space}%\n \\fi\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}%\n \\fi\n #7}}%\n \\fi\n \\@xsect{#5}}\n\\def\\@xsect#1{%\n \\@tempskipa #1\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n \\par \\nobreak\n \\vskip \\@tempskipa\n \\@afterheading\n \\else\n \\@nobreakfalse\n \\global\\@noskipsectrue\n \\everypar{%\n \\if@noskipsec\n \\global\\@noskipsecfalse\n {\\setbox\\z@\\lastbox}%\n \\clubpenalty\\@M\n \\begingroup \\@svsechd \\endgroup\n \\unskip\n \\@tempskipa #1\\relax\n \\hskip -\\@tempskipa\n \\else\n \\clubpenalty \\@clubpenalty\n \\everypar{}%\n \\fi}%\n \\fi\n \\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\@ssect#1#2#3#4#5{%\n \\@tempskipa #3\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n \\begingroup\n #4{%\n \\@hangfrom{\\hskip #1}%\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M #5\\@@par}%\n \\endgroup\n \\else\n \\def\\@svsechd{#4{\\hskip #1\\relax #5}}%\n \\fi\n \\@xsect{#3}}\n\\def\\@seccntformat#1{\\csname the#1\\endcsname\\quad}\n\\def\\@starttoc#1#2{\\begingroup\\makeatletter\n \\setTrue{#1}%\n \\par\\removelastskip\\vskip\\z@skip\n \\@startsection{section}\\@M\\z@{\\linespacing\\@plus\\linespacing}%\n {.5\\linespacing}{\\centering\\contentsnamefont}{#2}%\n \\@input{\\jobname.#1}%\n \\if@filesw\n \\@xp\\newwrite\\csname tf@#1\\endcsname\n \\immediate\\@xp\\openout\\csname tf@#1\\endcsname \\jobname.#1\\relax\n \\fi\n \\global\\@nobreakfalse \\endgroup\n \\addvspace{32\\p@\\@plus14\\p@}%\n}\n\\def\\l@section{\\@tocline{1}{0pt}{1pc}{2pc}{}}\n\\def\\l@subsection{\\@tocline{2}{0pt}{1pc}{3pc}{}}\n\\def\\l@subsubsection{\\@tocline{3}{0pt}{1pc}{5pc}{}}\n\\def\\@makefntext{\\noindent\\@makefnmark}\n\\if@ACM@sigchiamode\n\\long\\def\\@footnotetext#1{\\marginpar{%\n \\reset@font\\small\n \\interlinepenalty\\interfootnotelinepenalty\n \\protected@edef\\@currentlabel{%\n \\csname p@footnote\\endcsname\\@thefnmark\n }%\n \\color@begingroup\n \\@makefntext{%\n \\rule\\z@\\footnotesep\\ignorespaces#1\\@finalstrut\\strutbox}%\n \\color@endgroup}}%\n\\fi\n\\long\\def\\@mpfootnotetext#1{%\n \\global\\setbox\\@mpfootins\\vbox{%\n \\unvbox\\@mpfootins\n \\reset@font\\footnotesize\n \\hsize\\columnwidth\n \\@parboxrestore\n \\protected@edef\\@currentlabel\n {\\csname p@mpfootnote\\endcsname\\@thefnmark}%\n \\color@begingroup\\centering\n \\@makefntext{%\n \\rule\\z@\\footnotesep\\ignorespaces#1\\@finalstrut\\strutbox}%\n \\color@endgroup}}\n\\def\\@makefnmark{\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont\\@thefnmark}}}\n\\let\\@footnotemark@nolink\\@footnotemark\n\\let\\@footnotetext@nolink\\@footnotetext\n\\RequirePackage[bookmarksnumbered,unicode]{hyperref}\n\\RequirePackage{hyperxmp}\n\\pdfstringdefDisableCommands{%\n \\def\\addtocounter#1#2{}%\n \\def\\unskip{}%\n \\def\\textbullet{- }%\n \\def\\textrightarrow{ -> }%\n \\def\\footnotemark{}%\n}\n\\urlstyle{rm}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n\\or % acmlarge\n\\or % acmtog\n\\or % sigconf\n\\or % siggraph\n\\or % sigplan\n \\urlstyle{sf}\n\\or % sigchi\n\\or % sigchi-a\n \\urlstyle{sf}\n\\or % acmengage\n\\or % acmcp\n\\fi\n\\AtEndPreamble{%\n \\if@ACM@urlbreakonhyphens\n \\def\\do@url@hyp{\\do\\-}%\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@screen\n \\hypersetup{colorlinks,\n linkcolor=ACMPurple,\n citecolor=ACMPurple,\n urlcolor=ACMDarkBlue,\n filecolor=ACMDarkBlue}\n \\else\n \\hypersetup{hidelinks}\n \\fi\n \\hypersetup{pdflang={en},\n pdfdisplaydoctitle}}\n\\if@ACM@natbib\n \\let\\citeN\\cite\n \\let\\cite\\citep\n \\let\\citeANP\\citeauthor\n \\let\\citeNN\\citeyearpar\n \\let\\citeyearNP\\citeyear\n \\let\\citeNP\\citealt\n \\DeclareRobustCommand\\citeA\n {\\begingroup\\NAT@swafalse\n \\let\\NAT@ctype\\@ne\\NAT@partrue\\NAT@fullfalse\\NAT@open\\NAT@citetp}%\n \\providecommand\\newblock{}%\n\\else\n \\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\let\\shortcite\\cite%\n \\providecommand\\citename[1]{#1}}\n\\fi\n\\newcommand\\shortcite[2][]{%\n \\ifNAT@numbers\\cite[#1]{#2}\\else\\citeyearpar[#1]{#2}\\fi}\n\\def\\bibliographystyle#1{%\n \\ifx\\@begindocumenthook\\@undefined\\else\n \\expandafter\\AtBeginDocument\n \\fi\n {\\if@filesw\n \\immediate\\write\\@auxout{\\string\\bibstyle{#1}}%\n \\fi}}\n\\RequirePackage{graphicx}\n\\RequirePackage[prologue]{xcolor}\n\\definecolor[named]{ACMBlue}{cmyk}{1,0.1,0,0.1}\n\\definecolor[named]{ACMYellow}{cmyk}{0,0.16,1,0}\n\\definecolor[named]{ACMOrange}{cmyk}{0,0.42,1,0.01}\n\\definecolor[named]{ACMRed}{cmyk}{0,0.90,0.86,0}\n\\definecolor[named]{ACMLightBlue}{cmyk}{0.49,0.01,0,0}\n\\definecolor[named]{ACMGreen}{cmyk}{0.20,0,1,0.19}\n\\definecolor[named]{ACMPurple}{cmyk}{0.55,1,0,0.15}\n\\definecolor[named]{ACMDarkBlue}{cmyk}{1,0.58,0,0.21}\n\\if@ACM@authordraft\n \\RequirePackage{draftwatermark}\n \\SetWatermarkFontSize{0.5in}\n \\SetWatermarkColor[gray]{.9}\n \\SetWatermarkText{\\parbox{12em}{\\centering\n Unpublished working draft.\\\\\n Not for distribution.}}\n\\else\n \\if@ACM@sigchiamode\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\n \\RequirePackage{draftwatermark}\n \\SetWatermarkFontSize{0.5in}\n \\SetWatermarkColor[gray]{.9}\n \\SetWatermarkText{\\parbox{12em}{\\centering\n Legacy document. \\\\\n Not for publication in an ACM venue}}\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\\RequirePackage{geometry}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n \\geometry{letterpaper,head=13pt,\n marginparwidth=6pc,heightrounded}%\n\\or % acmsmall\n \\geometry{twoside=true,\n includeheadfoot, head=13pt, foot=2pc,\n paperwidth=6.75in, paperheight=10in,\n top=58pt, bottom=44pt, inner=46pt, outer=46pt,\n marginparwidth=2pc,heightrounded\n }%\n\\or % acmlarge\n \\geometry{twoside=true, head=13pt, foot=2pc,\n paperwidth=8.5in, paperheight=11in,\n includeheadfoot,\n top=78pt, bottom=114pt, inner=81pt, outer=81pt,\n marginparwidth=4pc,heightrounded\n }%\n\\or % acmtog\n \\geometry{twoside=true, head=13pt, foot=2pc,\n paperwidth=8.5in, paperheight=11in,\n includeheadfoot, columnsep=24pt,\n top=52pt, bottom=75pt, inner=52pt, outer=52pt,\n marginparwidth=2pc,heightrounded\n }%\n\\or % sigconf\n \\geometry{twoside=true, head=13pt,\n paperwidth=8.5in, paperheight=11in,\n includeheadfoot, columnsep=2pc,\n top=57pt, bottom=73pt, inner=54pt, outer=54pt,\n marginparwidth=2pc,heightrounded\n }%\n\\or % siggraph\n \\geometry{twoside=true, head=13pt,\n paperwidth=8.5in, paperheight=11in,\n includeheadfoot, columnsep=2pc,\n top=57pt, bottom=73pt, inner=54pt, outer=54pt,\n marginparwidth=2pc,heightrounded\n }%\n\\or % sigplan\n \\geometry{twoside=true, head=13pt,\n paperwidth=8.5in, paperheight=11in,\n includeheadfoot=false, columnsep=2pc,\n top=1in, bottom=1in, inner=0.75in, outer=0.75in,\n marginparwidth=2pc,heightrounded\n }%\n\\or % sigchi\n \\geometry{twoside=true, head=13pt,\n paperwidth=8.5in, paperheight=11in,\n includeheadfoot, columnsep=2pc,\n top=66pt, bottom=73pt, inner=54pt, outer=54pt,\n marginparwidth=2pc,heightrounded\n }%\n\\or % sigchi-a\n \\geometry{twoside=false, head=13pt,\n paperwidth=11in, paperheight=8.5in,\n includeheadfoot, marginparsep=72pt,\n marginparwidth=170pt, columnsep=20pt,\n top=72pt, bottom=72pt, left=314pt, right=72pt\n }%\n \\@mparswitchfalse\n \\reversemarginpar\n\\or % acmengage\n \\geometry{twoside=true, head=13pt,\n paperwidth=8.5in, paperheight=11in,\n includeheadfoot, columnsep=2pc,\n top=57pt, bottom=73pt, inner=54pt, outer=54pt,\n marginparwidth=2pc,heightrounded\n }%\n\\or % acmcp\n \\geometry{twoside=true,\n includeheadfoot, head=13pt, foot=2pc,\n paperwidth=6.75in, paperheight=10in,\n top=58pt, bottom=44pt, inner=46pt, outer=46pt,\n marginparwidth=2pc,heightrounded\n }%\n\\fi\n\\setlength\\parindent{10\\p@}\n\\setlength\\parskip{\\z@}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n\\or % acmlarge\n\\or % acmtog\n \\setlength\\parindent{9\\p@}%\n\\or % sigconf\n\\or % siggraph\n\\or % sigplan\n\\or % sigchi\n\\or % sigchi-a\n\\or % acmengage\n\\or % acmcp\n\\fi\n\\setlength\\normalparindent{\\parindent}\n\\def\\copyrightpermissionfootnoterule{\\kern-3\\p@\n \\hrule \\@width \\columnwidth \\kern 2.6\\p@}\n\\RequirePackage{manyfoot}\n\\SelectFootnoteRule[2]{copyrightpermission}\n\\DeclareNewFootnote{authorsaddresses}\n\\SelectFootnoteRule[2]{copyrightpermission}\n\\DeclareNewFootnote{copyrightpermission}\n\\def\\footnoterule{\\kern-3\\p@\n \\hrule \\@width 4pc \\kern 2.6\\p@}\n\\def\\endminipage{%\n \\par\n \\unskip\n \\ifvoid\\@mpfootins\\else\n \\vskip\\skip\\@mpfootins\n \\normalcolor\n \\unvbox\\@mpfootins\n \\fi\n \\@minipagefalse\n \\color@endgroup\n \\egroup\n \\expandafter\\@iiiparbox\\@mpargs{\\unvbox\\@tempboxa}}\n\\def\\@textbottom{\\vskip \\z@ \\@plus 1pt}\n\\let\\@texttop\\relax\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n\\or % acmlarge\n\\or % acmtog\n \\flushbottom\n\\or % sigconf\n \\flushbottom\n\\or % siggraph\n \\flushbottom\n\\or % sigplan\n \\flushbottom\n\\or % sigchi\n \\flushbottom\n\\or % sigchi-a\n\\or % acmengage\n \\flushbottom\n\\or % acmcp\n \\flushbottom\n\\fi\n\\ifPDFTeX\n\\input{glyphtounicode}\n\\pdfglyphtounicode{f_f}{FB00}\n\\pdfglyphtounicode{f_f_i}{FB03}\n\\pdfglyphtounicode{f_f_l}{FB04}\n\\pdfglyphtounicode{f_i}{FB01}\n\\pdfglyphtounicode{t_t}{0074 0074}\n\\pdfglyphtounicode{f_t}{0066 0074}\n\\pdfglyphtounicode{T_h}{0054 0068}\n\\pdfgentounicode=1\n\\RequirePackage{cmap}\n\\fi\n\\newif\\if@ACM@newfonts\n\\@ACM@newfontstrue\n\\IfFileExists{libertine.sty}{}{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{You do not\n have the libertine package installed. Please upgrade your\n TeX}\\@ACM@newfontsfalse}\n\\IfFileExists{zi4.sty}{}{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{You do not\n have the inconsolata (zi4.sty) package installed. Please upgrade your\n TeX}\\@ACM@newfontsfalse}\n\\IfFileExists{newtxmath.sty}{}{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{You do not\n have the newtxmath package installed. Please upgrade your\n TeX}\\@ACM@newfontsfalse}\n\\if@ACM@newfonts\n \\ifxetex\n \\RequirePackage{amssymb}\n \\RequirePackage{unicode-math}\n \\setmathfont[Scale=MatchUppercase]{LibertinusMath-Regular.otf}\n \\setmathfont{latinmodern-math.otf}[range={cal}]\n \\RequirePackage[tt=false]{libertine}\n \\setmonofont[StylisticSet=3]{inconsolata}\n \\else\n \\ifluatex\n \\RequirePackage{amssymb}\n \\RequirePackage{unicode-math}\n \\setmathfont[Scale=MatchUppercase]{LibertinusMath-Regular.otf}\n \\setmathfont{latinmodern-math.otf}[range={cal}]\n \\RequirePackage[tt=false]{libertine}\n \\setmonofont[StylisticSet=3]{inconsolata}\n \\else\n \\RequirePackage[T1]{fontenc}\n \\RequirePackage[tt=false, type1=true]{libertine}\n \\RequirePackage[varqu]{zi4}\n \\RequirePackage[libertine]{newtxmath}\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\\let\\liningnums\\@undefined\n\\AtEndPreamble{%\n \\DeclareTextFontCommand{\\liningnums}{\\libertineLF}}\n\\if@ACM@sigchiamode\n \\renewcommand{\\familydefault}{\\sfdefault}\n\\fi\n\\newif\\if@Description@present\n\\@Description@presenttrue\n\\newif\\if@undescribed@images\n\\@undescribed@imagesfalse\n\\newcommand\\Description[2][]{\\global\\@Description@presenttrue\\ignorespaces}\n\\AtEndDocument{\\if@undescribed@images\n \\ClassWarningNoLine{\\@classname}{Some images may lack\n descriptions.\\MessageBreak\n ACM is committed to complying with the upcoming US ADA\n https://accessiblyapp.com/accessibility-compliance/ada/ and European\n Accessibility Act\n (EAA) https://accessiblyapp.com/accessibility-compliance/eaa/\n regulations by actively working to ensure our publications and\n application services are accessible to individuals with\n disabilities, adhering to the WCAG guidelines to provide a seamless\n experience for all users, and regularly reviewing our accessibility\n practices to maintain compliance with evolving standards. \\MessageBreak\n To this end, we strongly encourage our authors to provide\n alternative text and captions for images and multimedia content. It\n is also important to optimize color contrast for the visually\n impaired. Taking these important steps when creating your papers\n will ensure that the widest possible audience can ingest your\n work.}\\fi}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{figure}{\\@Description@presentfalse\n \\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{figure*}{\\@Description@presentfalse\n \\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtEndEnvironment{figure}{\\if@Description@present\\else\n \\global\\@undescribed@imagestrue\n \\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{A possible image without description}\\fi}\n\\AtEndEnvironment{figure*}{\\if@Description@present\\else\n \\global\\@undescribed@imagestrue\n \\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{A possible image without description}\\fi}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{table}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{table*}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{algorithm}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{algorithm*}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{lstlisting}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{lstlisting*}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{minted}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{minted*}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{listing}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{listing*}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{lstinputlisting}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{lstinputlisting*}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\n\\RequirePackage{caption, float}\n\\captionsetup[table]{position=top}\n\\if@ACM@journal\n \\captionsetup{labelfont={sf, small},\n textfont={sf, small}, margin=\\z@}\n \\captionsetup[figure]{name={Fig.}}\n\\else\n \\captionsetup{labelfont={bf},\n textfont={bf}, labelsep=colon, margin=\\z@}\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\or % acmtog\n \\or % sigconf\n \\or % siggraph\n \\captionsetup{textfont={it}}\n \\or % sigplan\n \\captionsetup{labelfont={bf},\n textfont={normalfont}, labelsep=period, margin=\\z@}\n \\or % sigchi\n \\captionsetup[figure]{labelfont={bf, small},\n textfont={bf, small}}\n \\captionsetup[table]{labelfont={bf, small},\n textfont={bf, small}}\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\captionsetup[figure]{labelfont={bf, small},\n textfont={bf, small}}\n \\captionsetup[table]{labelfont={bf, small},\n textfont={bf, small}}\n \\or % acmengage\n \\or % acmcp\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\\newfloat{sidebar}{}{sbar}\n\\floatname{sidebar}{Sidebar}\n\\renewenvironment{sidebar}{\\Collect@Body\\@sidebar}{}\n\\long\\def\\@sidebar#1{\\bgroup\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig\\captionsetup{type=sidebar}%\n \\marginpar{\\small#1}\\egroup}\n\\newenvironment{marginfigure}{\\Collect@Body\\@marginfigure}{}\n\\long\\def\\@marginfigure#1{\\bgroup\n \\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig\n \\captionsetup{type=figure}%\n \\marginpar{\\@Description@presentfalse\\centering\n \\small#1\\if@Description@present\\else\n \\global\\@undescribed@imagestrue\n \\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{A possible image without description}\n \\fi}%\n \\egroup}\n\\newenvironment{margintable}{\\Collect@Body\\@margintable}{}\n\\long\\def\\@margintable#1{\\bgroup\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig\\captionsetup{type=table}%\n \\marginpar{\\centering\\small#1}\\egroup}\n\\newdimen\\fulltextwidth\n\\fulltextwidth=\\dimexpr(\\textwidth+\\marginparwidth+\\marginparsep)\n\\if@ACM@sigchiamode\n\\def\\@dblfloat{\\bgroup\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig\\columnwidth=\\fulltextwidth\n \\let\\@endfloatbox\\@endwidefloatbox\n \\def\\@fpsadddefault{\\def\\@fps{tp}}%\n \\@float}\n\\fi\n\\if@ACM@sigchiamode\n\\def\\end@dblfloat{%\n \\end@float\\egroup}\n\\fi\n\\def\\@endwidefloatbox{%\n \\par\\vskip\\z@skip\n \\@minipagefalse\n \\outer@nobreak\n \\egroup\n \\color@endbox\n \\global\\setbox\\@currbox=\\vbox{\\moveleft\n \\dimexpr(\\fulltextwidth-\\textwidth)\\box\\@currbox}%\n \\wd\\@currbox=\\textwidth\n}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n\\or % acmlarge\n\\or % acmtog\n\\or % sigconf\n\\or % siggraph\n\\or % sigplan\n\\def\\labelenumi{\\theenumi.}\n\\def\\labelenumii{\\theenumii.}\n\\def\\labelenumiii{\\theenumiii.}\n\\def\\labelenumiv{\\theenumiv.}\n\\or % sigchi\n\\or % sigchi-a\n\\or % acmengage\n\\or % acmcp\n\\fi\n\\newdimen\\@ACM@labelwidth\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\setlength\\labelsep{4pt}\n \\setlength{\\@ACM@labelwidth}{6.5pt}\n\n %% First-level list: when beginning after the first line of an\n %% indented paragraph or ending before an indented paragraph, labels\n %% should not hang to the left of the preceding/following text.\n \\setlength\\leftmargini{\\z@}\n \\addtolength\\leftmargini{\\parindent}\n \\addtolength\\leftmargini{2\\labelsep}\n \\addtolength\\leftmargini{\\@ACM@labelwidth}\n\n %% Second-level and higher lists.\n \\setlength\\leftmarginii{\\z@}\n \\addtolength\\leftmarginii{0.5\\labelsep}\n \\addtolength\\leftmarginii{\\@ACM@labelwidth}\n \\setlength\\leftmarginiii{\\leftmarginii}\n \\setlength\\leftmarginiv{\\leftmarginiii}\n \\setlength\\leftmarginv{\\leftmarginiv}\n \\setlength\\leftmarginvi{\\leftmarginv}\n \\@listi}\n\\newskip\\listisep\n\\listisep\\smallskipamount\n\\def\\@listI{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\labelwidth\\leftmargini \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\listparindent\\z@\n \\topsep\\listisep}\n\\let\\@listi\\@listI\n\\def\\@listii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginii \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep\\z@skip}\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiii \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listiv{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiv \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listv{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginv \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listvi{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginvi\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginvi \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\renewcommand{\\descriptionlabel}[1]{\\upshape\\bfseries #1}\n\\renewenvironment{description}{\\list{}{%\n \\labelwidth\\@ACM@labelwidth\n \\let\\makelabel\\descriptionlabel}%\n}{\n \\endlist\n}\n\\let\\enddescription=\\endlist % for efficiency\n\\newif\\if@ACM@maketitle@typeset\n\\@ACM@maketitle@typesetfalse\n\\define@choicekey*+{ACM}{acmJournal}[\\@journalCode\\@journalCode@nr]{%\n ACMJCSS,%\n ACMJDS,%\n AILET,%\n CIE,%\n CSUR,%\n DGOV,%\n DLT,%\n DTRAP,%\n FAC,%\n GAMES,%\n HEALTH,%\n IMWUT,%\n JACM,%\n JATS,%\n JDIQ,%\n JDS,%\n JEA,%\n JERIC,%\n JETC,%\n JOCCH,%\n JRC,%\n PACMCGIT,%\n PACMHCI,%\n PACMMOD,%\n PACMNET,%\n PACMPL,%\n PACMSE,%\n POMACS,%\n TAAS,%\n TACCESS,%\n TACO,%\n TAIS,%\n TAISAP,%\n TALG,%\n TALLIP,%\n TAP,%\n TCPS,%\n TDS,%\n TEAC,%\n TECS,%\n TELO,%\n THRI,%\n TIIS,%\n TIOT,%\n TISSEC,%\n TIST,%\n TKDD,%\n TMIS,%\n TOCE,%\n TOCHI,%\n TOCL,%\n TOCS,%\n TOCT,%\n TODAES,%\n TODS,%\n TOG,%\n TOIS,%\n TOIT,%\n TOMACS,%\n TOMM,%\n TOMPECS,%\n TOMS,%\n TOPC,%\n TOPLAS,%\n TOPML,%\n TOPS,%\n TORS,%\n TOS,%\n TOSEM,%\n TOSN,%\n TQC,%\n TRETS,%\n TSAS,%\n TSC,%\n TSLP,%\n TWEB,%\n FACMP%\n}{%\n\\ifcase\\@journalCode@nr\n\\relax % ACMJCSS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM J. Comput. Sustain. Soc.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2834-5533}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2834-5533}%\n\\or % ACMJCDS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Journal of Data Science}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM J. Data Sci.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{0000-0000}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{0000-0000}%\n\\or % AILET\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM AI Letters}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM AI Lett.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{3068-8590}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{3068-8590}%\n\\or % CIE\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Computers in Entertainment}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Comput. Entertain.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1544-3574}%\n\\or % CSUR\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Computing Surveys}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Comput. Surv.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{0360-0300}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1557-7341}%\n\\or % DGOV\n \\def\\@journalName{Digital Government: Research and Practice}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Digit. Gov. Res. Pract.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2639-0175}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2639-0175}%\n\\or % DLT\n \\def\\@journalName{Distributed Ledger Technologies: Research and Practice}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Distrib. Ledger Technol.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2769-6472}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2769-6480}%\n\\or % DTRAP\n \\def\\@journalName{Digital Threats: Research and Practice}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Digit. Threat. Res. Pract.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2576-5337}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2576-5337}%\n\\or % FAC\n \\def\\@journalName{Formal Aspects of Computing}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Form. Asp. Comput.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{0934-5043}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1433-299X}%\n\\or % GAMES\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Games: Research and Practice}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Games}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2832-5516}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2832-5516}%\n\\or % HEALTH\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Comput. Healthcare}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2637-8051}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2637-8051}%\n\\or % IMWUT\n \\def\\@journalName{Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile,\n Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2474-9567}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2474-9567}%\n \\@ACM@screentrue\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using screen mode due to \\@journalCode}%\n\\or % JACM\n \\def\\@journalName{Journal of the ACM}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{J. ACM}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{0004-5411}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1557-735X}%\n\\or % JATS\n \\def\\@journalName{Journal on Autonomous Transportation Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM J. Auton. Transport. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2833-0528}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2833-0528}%\n\\or % JDIQ\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM J. Data Inform. Quality}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1936-1955}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1936-1963}%\n\\or % JDS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM/IMS Journal of Data Science}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM/IMS J. Data Sci.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2831-3194}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2831-3194}%\n\\or % JEA\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM J. Exp. Algor.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1084-6654}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1084-6654}%\n\\or % JERIC\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM J. Edu. Resources in Comput.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1073-0516}%\n\\or % JETC\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1550-4832}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1550-4840}%\n\\or % JOCCH\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM J. Comput. Cult. Herit.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1556-4673}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1556-4711}%\n\\or % JRC\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Journal on Responsible Computing}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM J. Responsib. Comput.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2832-0565}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2832-0565}%\n\\or % PACMCGIT\n \\def\\@journalName{Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Proc. ACM Comput. Graph. Interact. Tech.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2577-6193}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2577-6193}%\n \\@ACM@screentrue\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using screen mode due to \\@journalCode}%\n\\or % PACMHCI\n \\def\\@journalName{Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2573-0142}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2573-0142}%\n \\@ACM@screentrue\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using screen mode due to \\@journalCode}%\n\\or % PACMMOD\n \\def\\@journalName{Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Proc. ACM Manag. Data}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2836-6573}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2836-6573}%\n\\or % PACMNET\n \\def\\@journalName{Proceedings of the ACM on Networkng}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Proc. ACM Netw.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2834-5509}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2834-5509}%\n\\or % PACMPL\n \\def\\@journalName{Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Proc. ACM Program. Lang.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2475-1421}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2475-1421}%\n \\@ACM@screentrue\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using screen mode due to \\@journalCode}%\n\\or % PACMSE\n \\def\\@journalName{Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Proc. ACM Softw. Eng.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2994-970X}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2994-970X}%\n \\@ACM@screentrue\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using screen mode due to \\@journalCode}%\n\\or % POMACS\n \\def\\@journalName{Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Proc. ACM Meas. Anal. Comput. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2476-1249}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2476-1249}%\n \\@ACM@screentrue\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using screen mode due to \\@journalCode}%\n\\or % TAAS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Autonom. Adapt. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1556-4665}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1556-4703}%\n\\or % TACCESS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Access. Comput.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1936-7228}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1936-7236}%\n\\or % TACO\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Arch. Code Optim.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1544-3566}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1544-3973}%\n\\or % TAIS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on AI for Science}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. AI Sci.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{3066-4438}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{3066-4438}%\n\\or % TAISAP\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on AI Security and Privacy}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. AI Secur. Priv.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{3068-3564}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{3068-3564}%\n\\or % TALG\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Algorithms}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Algor.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1549-6325}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1549-6333}%\n\\or % TALLIP\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Asian Low-Resour. Lang. Inf. Process.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2375-4699}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2375-4702}%\n\\or % TAP\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Applied Perception}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Appl. Percept.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1544-3558}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1544-3965}%\n\\or % TCPS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Cyber-Phys. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2378-962X}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2378-9638}%\n\\or % TDS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM/IMS Transactions on Data Science}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM/IMS Trans. Data Sci.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2577-3224}%\n\\or % TEAC\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Econ. Comput.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2167-8375}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2167-8383}%\n\\or % TECS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Embedd. Comput. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1539-9087}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1558-3465}%\n\\or % TELO\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning and Optimization}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Evol. Learn. Optim.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2688-299X}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2688-3007}%\n\\or % THRI\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Hum.-Robot Interact.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2573-9522}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2573-9522}%\n\\or % TIIS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2160-6455}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2160-6463}%\n\\or % TIOT\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Internet of Things}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Internet Things}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2577-6207}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2577-6207}%\n\\or % TISSEC\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Information and System Security}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Info. Syst. Sec.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1094-9224}%\n\\or % TIST\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2157-6904}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2157-6912}%\n\\or % TKDD\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1556-4681}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1556-472X}%\n\\or % TMIS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Manag. Inform. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2158-656X}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2158-6578}%\n\\or % TOCE\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Computing Education}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Comput. Educ.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1946-6226}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1946-6226}%\n\\or % TOCHI\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1073-0516}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1557-7325}%\n\\or % TOCL\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Computational Logic}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Comput. Logic}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1529-3785}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1557-945X}%\n\\or % TOCS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Computer Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Comput. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{0734-2071}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1557-7333}%\n\\or % TOCT\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Computation Theory}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Comput. Theory}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1942-3454}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1942-3462}%\n\\or % TODAES\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Des. Autom. Electron. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1084-4309}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1557-7309}%\n\\or % TODS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Database Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Datab. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{0362-5915}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1557-4644}%\n\\or % TOG\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Graphics}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Graph.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{0730-0301}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1557-7368}%\n\\or % TOIS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Information Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1046-8188}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1558-2868}%\n\\or % TOIT\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Internet Technology}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Internet Technol.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1533-5399}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1557-6051}%\n\\or % TOMACS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1049-3301}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1558-1195}%\n\\or % TOMM\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1551-6857}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1551-6865}%\n\\or % TOMPECS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Model. Perform. Eval. Comput. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2376-3639}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2376-3647}%\n\\or % TOMS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Math. Softw.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{0098-3500}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1557-7295}%\n\\or % TOPC\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Parallel Computing}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Parallel Comput.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2329-4949}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2329-4957}%\n\\or % TOPLAS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{0164-0925}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1558-4593}%\n\\or % TOPML\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Probabilistic Machine Learning}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Probab. Mach. Learn.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2836-8924}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2836-8924}%\n\\or % TOPS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Priv. Sec.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2471-2566}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2471-2574}%\n\\or % TORS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Recomm. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2770-6699}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2770-6699}%\n\\or % TOS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Storage}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Storage}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1553-3077}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1553-3093}%\n\\or % TOSEM\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1049-331X}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1557-7392}%\n\\or % TOSN\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Sensor Netw.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1550-4859}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1550-4867}%\n\\or % TQC\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Quantum Comput.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2643-6817}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2643-6817}%\n\\or % TRETS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Reconfig. Technol. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1936-7406}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1936-7414}%\n\\or % TSAS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Spatial Algorithms Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2374-0353}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2374-0361}%\n\\or % TSC\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Social Computing}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Soc. Comput.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2469-7818}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2469-7826}%\n\\or % TSLP\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Speech Lang. Process.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1550-4875}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{2329-9304}%\n\\or % TWEB\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on the Web}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Web}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1559-1131}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{1559-114X}%\n\\else % FACMP, a dummy journal\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Just Accepted}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Accepted}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{XXXX-XXXX}%\n\\fi\n\\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Using journal code \\@journalCode}%\n}{%\n \\ClassError{\\@classname}{Incorrect journal #1}%\n}%\n\\def\\acmJournal#1{\\setkeys{ACM}{acmJournal=#1}%\n \\global\\@ACM@journal@bibstriptrue\n \\global\\@ACM@journal@bibstrip@or@togtrue}\n\\def\\@journalCode@nr{0}\n\\def\\@journalName{}%\n\\def\\@journalNameShort{\\@journalName}%\n\\def\\@permissionCodeOne{XXXX-XXXX}%\n\\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{\\@permissionCodeOne}%\n\\newcommand\\acmConference[4][]{%\n \\gdef\\acmConference@shortname{#1}%\n \\gdef\\acmConference@name{#2}%\n \\gdef\\acmConference@date{#3}%\n \\gdef\\acmConference@venue{#4}%\n \\ifx\\acmConference@shortname\\@empty\n \\gdef\\acmConference@shortname{#2}%\n \\fi\n \\global\\@ACM@journal@bibstripfalse\n \\ifx\\@acmBooktitle\\@empty\\relax\n \\acmBooktitle{Proceedings of \\acmConference@name\n \\ifx\\acmConference@name\\acmConference@shortname\\else\n \\ (\\acmConference@shortname)\\fi}%\n \\fi\n}\n\\if@ACM@journal\\else\n\\acmConference[Conference'17]{ACM Conference}{July 2017}{Washington,\n DC, USA}%\n\\fi\n\\def\\acmBooktitle#1{\\gdef\\@acmBooktitle{#1}}\n\\acmBooktitle{}\n\\def\\@editorsAbbrev{(Ed.)}\n\\def\\@acmEditors{}\n\\def\\editor#1{\\ifx\\@acmEditors\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@acmEditors{#1}%\n \\else\n \\gdef\\@editorsAbbrev{(Eds.)}%\n \\g@addto@macro\\@acmEditors{\\and#1}%\n\\fi}\n\\def\\subtitle#1{\\def\\@subtitle{#1}}\n\\subtitle{}\n\\newcount\\num@authorgroups\n\\num@authorgroups=0\\relax\n\\newcount\\num@authors\n\\num@authors=0\\relax\n\\newif\\if@insideauthorgroup\n\\@insideauthorgroupfalse\n\\renewcommand\\author[2][]{%\n \\IfSubStr{\\detokenize{#2}}{,}{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{Do not put several\n authors in the same \\string\\author\\space macro!}}{}%\n \\global\\advance\\num@authors by 1\\relax\n \\if@insideauthorgroup\\else\n \\global\\advance\\num@authorgroups by 1\\relax\n \\global\\@insideauthorgrouptrue\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\addresses\\@empty\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\n \\gdef\\addresses{\\@author{Anonymous Author(s)%\n \\ifx\\@acmSubmissionID\\@empty\\else\\\\Submission Id:\n \\@acmSubmissionID\\fi}}%\n \\gdef\\authors{Anonymous Author(s)}%\n \\else\n \\expandafter\\gdef\\expandafter\\addresses\\expandafter{%\n \\expandafter\\@author\\expandafter{%\n \\csname typeset@author\\the\\num@authors\\endcsname{#2}}}%\n \\gdef\\authors{#2}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\\else\n \\expandafter\\g@addto@macro\\expandafter\\addresses\\expandafter{%\n \\expandafter\\and\\expandafter\\@author\\expandafter{%\n \\csname typeset@author\\the\\num@authors\\endcsname{#2}}}%\n \\g@addto@macro\\authors{\\and#2}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\n \\ifx\\shortauthors\\@empty\n \\gdef\\shortauthors{Anon.\n \\ifx\\@acmSubmissionID\\@empty\\else Submission Id:\n \\@acmSubmissionID\\fi}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\def\\@tempa{#1}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty\n \\ifx\\shortauthors\\@empty\n \\gdef\\shortauthors{#2}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\shortauthors{\\and#2}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\ifx\\shortauthors\\@empty\n \\gdef\\shortauthors{#1}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\shortauthors{\\and#1}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi}\n\\newcommand{\\affiliation}[2][]{%\n \\global\\@insideauthorgroupfalse\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\addresses{\\affiliation{#1}{#2}}%\n \\fi}\n\\define@boolkey+{@ACM@affiliation@}[@ACM@affiliation@]{obeypunctuation}%\n[true]{}{\\ClassError{\\@classname}{The option obeypunctuation can be either true or false}}\n\\def\\additionalaffiliation#1{\\authornote{\\@additionalaffiliation{#1}}}\n\\def\\@additionalaffiliation#1{\\bgroup\n \\def\\position##1{\\ignorespaces}%\n \\def\\institution##1{##1\\ignorespaces}%\n \\def\\department{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@department}{\\@department[]}}%\n \\def\\@department[##1]##2{##2, \\ignorespaces}%\n \\let\\city\\position\n \\let\\state\\position\n \\let\\country\\position\n Also with #1\\unskip.\\egroup}\n\\renewcommand{\\email}[2][]{%\n \\IfSubStr{#2}{,}{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{Do not put several\n addresses in the same \\string\\email\\space macro!}}{}%\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\addresses{\\email{#1}{#2}}%\n \\fi}\n\\def\\orcid#1{\\unskip\\ignorespaces%\n \\protected\\def\\orcidsite{https://orcid.org/}%\n \\IfBeginWith{#1}{http}{%\n \\expandafter\\gdef\\csname\n typeset@author\\the\\num@authors\\endcsname##1{%\n \\href{#1}{##1}}}{%\n \\expandafter\\gdef\\csname\n typeset@author\\the\\num@authors\\endcsname##1{%\n \\href{\\orcidsite#1}{##1}}}}\n\\def\\authorsaddresses#1{\\def\\@authorsaddresses{#1}}\n\\authorsaddresses{\\@mkauthorsaddresses}\n\\newcommand\\@mktranslatedkeywords[2]{\\bgroup\n \\selectlanguage{#1}%\n {\\@specialsection{\\keywordsname}%\n \\noindent#2\\par}\\egroup}\n\\def\\@titlenotes{}\n\\def\\titlenote#1{%\n \\g@addto@macro\\@title{\\footnotemark}%\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\n \\g@addto@macro\\@titlenotes{%\n \\stepcounter{footnote}\\footnotetext{Title note}}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\@titlenotes{\\stepcounter{footnote}\\footnotetext{#1}}%\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@subtitlenotes{}\n\\def\\subtitlenote#1{%\n \\g@addto@macro\\@subtitle{\\footnotemark}%\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\n \\g@addto@macro\\@subtitlenotes{%\n \\stepcounter{footnote}\\footnotetext{Subtitle note}}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\@subtitlenotes{%\n \\stepcounter{footnote}\\footnotetext{#1}}%\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@authornotes{}\n\\def\\authornote#1{%\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\addresses{\\@authornotemark}%\n \\g@addto@macro\\@authornotes{%\n \\stepcounter{footnote}\\footnotetext{#1}}%\n \\fi}\n\\newcommand\\authornotemark[1][\\relax]{%\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\\else\n \\ifx#1\\relax\\relax\\relax\n \\g@addto@macro\\addresses{\\@authornotemark}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\addresses{\\@@authornotemark{#1}}%\n \\fi\n \\fi}\n\\def\\acmVolume#1{\\def\\@acmVolume{#1}}\n\\acmVolume{1}\n\\def\\acmNumber#1{\\def\\@acmNumber{#1}}\n\\acmNumber{1}\n\\def\\acmArticle#1{\\def\\@acmArticle{#1}}\n\\acmArticle{}\n\\def\\acmArticleSeq#1{\\def\\@acmArticleSeq{#1}}\n\\acmArticleSeq{\\@acmArticle}\n\\def\\acmYear#1{\\def\\@acmYear{#1}}\n\\acmYear{\\the\\year}\n\\def\\acmMonth#1{\\def\\@acmMonth{#1}}\n\\acmMonth{\\the\\month}\n\\def\\@acmPubDate{\\ifcase\\@acmMonth\\or\n January\\or February\\or March\\or April\\or May\\or June\\or\n July\\or August\\or September\\or October\\or November\\or\n December\\fi~\\@acmYear}\n\\def\\acmPrice#1{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{The macro \\string\\acmPrice\n is obsolete. ACM no longer prints the price in bibstrip.}}\n\\def\\acmSubmissionID#1{\\def\\@acmSubmissionID{#1}}\n\\acmSubmissionID{}\n\\def\\acmISBN#1{\\def\\@acmISBN{#1}}\n\\acmISBN{978-x-xxxx-xxxx-x/YYYY/MM}\n\\def\\acmDOI#1{\\def\\@acmDOI{#1}}\n\\acmDOI{10.1145/nnnnnnn.nnnnnnn}\n\\newlength\\@ACM@badge@width\n\\setlength\\@ACM@badge@width{3pc}\n\\newlength\\@ACM@title@width\n\\newlength\\@ACM@badge@skip\n\\setlength\\@ACM@badge@skip{1pt}\n\\def\\@acmBadgeR{}\n\\def\\@acmBadgeL{}\n\\newcommand\\acmBadgeR[2][]{%\n \\ifx\\@acmBadgeR\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@acmBadgeR{%\n \\smash{%\n \\raisebox{0.5\\height}{%\n \\href{#1}{\\includegraphics[width=\\@ACM@badge@width]{#2}}}}}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro{\\@acmBadgeR}{%\n \\hspace{\\@ACM@badge@skip}%\n \\smash{%\n \\raisebox{0.5\\height}{%\n \\href{#1}{\\includegraphics[width=\\@ACM@badge@width]{#2}}}}}%\n \\fi}\n\\newcommand\\acmBadgeL[2][]{%\n \\ifx\\@acmBadgeL\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@acmBadgeL{%\n \\smash{%\n \\raisebox{0.5\\height}{%\n \\href{#1}{\\includegraphics[width=\\@ACM@badge@width]{#2}}}}}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro{\\@acmBadgeL}{%\n \\hspace{\\@ACM@badge@skip}%\n \\smash{%\n \\raisebox{0.5\\height}{%\n \\href{#1}{\\includegraphics[width=\\@ACM@badge@width]{#2}}}}}%\n \\fi}\n\\let\\acmBadge=\\acmBadgeR\n\\def\\startPage#1{\\def\\@startPage{#1}}\n\\startPage{}\n\\def\\terms#1{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{The command \\string\\terms{} is\n obsolete. I am going to ignore it}}\n\\def\\keywords#1{\\def\\@keywords{#1}}\n\\let\\@keywords\\@empty\n\\AtEndDocument{\\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\\ifx\\@keywords\\@empty\n \\ifnum\\getrefnumber{TotPages}>2\\relax\n \\ClassWarningNoLine{\\@classname}{ACM keywords are mandatory\n for papers over two pages}%\n \\fi\\fi\\fi}\n\\renewenvironment{abstract}{\\Collect@Body\\@saveabstract}{}\n\\long\\def\\@saveabstract#1{\\if@ACM@maketitle@typeset\n \\ClassError{\\@classname}{Abstract must be defined before maketitle\n command. Please move it!}\\fi\n \\long\\gdef\\@abstract{#1}}\n\\@saveabstract{}\n\\long\\def\\@lempty{}\n\\define@boolkey+{@ACM@topmatter@}[@ACM@]{printccs}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@printccs\n \\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Printing CCS}%\n \\else\n \\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Suppressing CCS}%\n \\fi}{\\ClassError{\\@classname}{The option printccs can be either true or false}}\n\\define@boolkey+{@ACM@topmatter@}[@ACM@]{printacmref}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@printacmref\n \\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Printing bibformat}%\n \\else\n \\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Suppressing bibformat}%\n \\fi}{\\ClassError{\\@classname}{The option printacmref can be either true or false}}\n\\AtEndDocument{\\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\\if@ACM@printacmref\\else\n \\ifnum\\getrefnumber{TotPages}>1\\relax\n \\ClassWarningNoLine{\\@classname}{%\n ACM reference format is mandatory \\MessageBreak\n for papers over one page. \\MessageBreak\n Please add printacmref=true to the \\MessageBreak\n \\string\\settopmatter\\space command.}%\n \\fi\\fi\\fi}\n\\define@boolkey+{@ACM@topmatter@}[@ACM@]{printfolios}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@printfolios\n \\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Printing folios}%\n \\else\n \\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Suppressing folios}%\n \\fi}{\\ClassError{\\@classname}{The option printfolios can be either true or false}}\n\\define@cmdkey{@ACM@topmatter@}[@ACM@]{authorsperrow}[0]{%\n \\IfInteger{#1}{\\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Setting authorsperrow to\n #1}}{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{The parameter authorsperrow must be\n numerical. Ignoring the input #1}\\gdef\\@ACM@authorsperrow{0}}}\n\\def\\settopmatter#1{\\setkeys{@ACM@topmatter@}{#1}}\n\\settopmatter{printccs=true, printacmref=true}\n\\if@ACM@manuscript\n \\settopmatter{printfolios=true}\n\\else\n \\if@ACM@journal\n \\settopmatter{printfolios=true}\n \\else\n \\settopmatter{printfolios=false}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\\settopmatter{authorsperrow=0}\n\\def\\@received{}\n\\newcommand\\received[2][]{\\def\\@tempa{#1}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty\n \\ifx\\@received\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@received{Received #2}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro{\\@received}{; revised #2}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\ifx\\@received\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@received{#1 #2}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro{\\@received}{; #1 #2}%\n \\fi\n \\fi}\n\\AtEndDocument{%\n \\ifx\\@received\\@empty\\else\n \\par\\bigskip\\noindent{\\small\\normalfont\\@received\\par}%\n \\fi}\n\\define@choicekey+{ACM}{articletype}[\\ACM@ArticleType\\ACM@ArticleType@nr]{%\n Research,Review,Discussion,Invited,Position}[Review]{%\n \\ifcase\\ACM@ArticleType@nr\n \\relax % Research\n \\colorlet{@ACM@Article@color}{ACMBlue}%\n \\or % Review\n \\colorlet{@ACM@Article@color}{ACMOrange}%\n \\or % Discussion\n \\colorlet{@ACM@Article@color}{ACMGreen}%\n \\or % Invited\n \\colorlet{@ACM@Article@color}{ACMPurple}%\n \\or % Position\n \\colorlet{@ACM@Article@color}{ACMRed}%\n \\fi\n}{%\n \\ClassError{\\@classname}{Article Type must be Research, Review,\\MessageBreak\n Discussion, Invited, or Position}}\n\\def\\acmArticleType#1{\\setkeys{ACM}{articletype=#1}}\n\\if@ACM@acmcp\n\\acmArticleType{Research}%\n\\fi\n % \\end{macrocode}\n\\newenvironment{@ACM@color@frame}{%\n \\def\\FrameCommand{\\hspace*{-6.5pc}%\n \\colorbox{@ACM@Article@color!10!white}}%\n \\MakeFramed {\\advance\\hsize\n -6.5pc\\relax\\FrameRestore}}{\\zsaveposy{@ACM@acmcpframe@y}%\n \\endMakeFramed}\n\\def\\acmCodeLink#1{%\n \\ifx\\@acmCodeDataLink\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@acmCodeDataLink{\\url{#1}}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro{\\@acmCodeDataLink}{\\\\ \\url{#1}}%\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@acmCodeDataLink{}\n\\def\\acmContributions#1{\\gdef\\@acmContributions{#1}}\n\\acmContributions{}\n\\let\\acmDataLink\\acmCodeLink\n\\RequirePackage{comment}\n\\excludecomment{CCSXML}\n\\let\\@concepts\\@empty\n\\newcounter{@concepts}\n\\newcommand\\ccsdesc[2][100]{%\n \\ccsdesc@parse#1~#2~~\\ccsdesc@parse@end}\n\\def\\textrightarrow{$\\rightarrow$}\n\\def\\ccsdesc@parse#1~#2~#3~{%\n \\stepcounter{@concepts}%\n \\expandafter\\ifx\\csname CCS@General@#2\\endcsname\\relax\n \\expandafter\\gdef\\csname CCS@General@#2\\endcsname{\\textbullet\\\n \\textbf{#2}}%\n \\expandafter\\gdef\\csname CCS@Punctuation@#2\\endcsname{; }%\n \\expandafter\\gdef\\csname CCS@Specific@#2\\endcsname{}%\n \\g@addto@macro{\\@concepts}{\\csname CCS@General@#2\\endcsname\n \\csname CCS@Punctuation@#2\\endcsname\n \\csname CCS@Specific@#2\\endcsname}%\n \\fi\n \\ifx#3\\relax\\relax\\else\n \\expandafter\\gdef\\csname CCS@Punctuation@#2\\endcsname{\n \\textrightarrow\\ }%\n \\expandafter\\g@addto@macro\\expandafter{\\csname CCS@Specific@#2\\endcsname}{%\n \\addtocounter{@concepts}{-1}%\n \\ifnum#1>499\\textbf{#3}\\else\n \\ifnum#1>299\\textit{#3}\\else\n #3\\fi\\fi\\ifnum\\value{@concepts}=0.\\else; \\fi}%\n \\fi\n\\ccsdesc@parse@finish}\n\\AtEndDocument{\\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\\ifx\\@concepts\\@empty\\relax\n \\ifnum\\getrefnumber{TotPages}>2\\relax\n \\ClassWarningNoLine{\\@classname}{CCS concepts are mandatory\n for papers over two pages}%\n \\fi\\fi\\fi}\n\\def\\ccsdesc@parse@finish#1\\ccsdesc@parse@end{}\n\\newif\\if@printcopyright\n\\@printcopyrighttrue\n\\newif\\if@printpermission\n\\@printpermissiontrue\n\\newif\\if@acmowned\n\\@acmownedtrue\n\\define@choicekey*{ACM@}{acmcopyrightmode}[%\n \\acm@copyrightinput\\acm@copyrightmode]{none,%\n acmcopyright,acmlicensed,rightsretained,%\n usgov,usgovmixed,cagov,cagovmixed,licensedusgovmixed,%\n licensedcagov,licensedcagovmixed,othergov,licensedothergov,%\n iw3c2w3,iw3c2w3g,cc}{%\n \\@printpermissiontrue\n \\@printcopyrighttrue\n \\@acmownedtrue\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=0\\relax % none\n \\@printpermissionfalse\n \\@printcopyrightfalse\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=2\\relax % acmlicensed\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=3\\relax % rightsretained\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=4\\relax % usgov\n \\@printpermissiontrue\n \\@printcopyrightfalse\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=6\\relax % cagov\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=8\\relax % licensedusgovmixed\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=9\\relax % licensedcagov\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=10\\relax % licensedcagovmixed\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=11\\relax % othergov\n \\@acmownedtrue\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=12\\relax % licensedothergov\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=13\\relax % iw3c2w3\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=14\\relax % iw3c2w3g\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=15\\relax % cc\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi}\n\\def\\setcopyright#1{\\setkeys{ACM@}{acmcopyrightmode=#1}}\n\\setcopyright{acmlicensed}\n\\newcommand\\setcctype[2][4.0]{%\n \\def\\ACM@cc@version{#1}%\n \\def\\ACM@cc@type{#2}}\n\\setcctype{by}\n\\def\\@copyrightowner{%\n \\ifcase\\acm@copyrightmode\\relax % none\n \\or % acmcopyright\n ACM\\@.\n \\or % acmlicensed\n Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to\n ACM\\@.\n \\or % rightsretained\n Copyright held by the owner/author(s).\n \\or % usgov\n \\or % usgovmixed\n Copyright held by the owner/author(s).\n \\or % cagov\n Copyright Crown in Right of Canada.\n \\or %cagovmixed\n Copyright held by the owner/author(s).\n \\or %licensedusgovmixed\n Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to\n ACM\\@.\n \\or % licensedcagov\n Copyright held by the owner/author(s).\n \\or %licensedcagovmixed\n Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to\n ACM\\@.\n \\or % othergov\n Copyright held by the owner/author(s).\n \\or % licensedothergov\n Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to\n ACM\\@.\n \\or % ic2w3www\n IW3C2 (International World Wide Web Conference Committee), published\n under Creative Commons CC-BY~4.0 License.\n \\or % ic2w3wwwgoogle\n IW3C2 (International World Wide Web Conference Committee), published\n under Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND~4.0 License.\n \\or % cc\n Copyright held by the owner/author(s).\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@formatdoi#1{\\url{https://doi.org/#1}}\n\\def\\@copyrightpermission{%\n \\ifcase\\acm@copyrightmode\\relax % none\n \\or % acmcopyright\n Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this\n work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided\n that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial\n advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on\n the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by\n others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is\n permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or\n to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission\n and\\hspace*{.5pt}/or\n a fee. Request permissions from permissions@acm.org.\n \\or % acmlicensed\n Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this\n work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided\n that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial\n advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on\n the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by\n others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit\n is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers\n or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission\n and\\hspace*{.5pt}/or a fee. Request permissions from\n permissions@acm.org.\n \\or % rightsretained\n Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this\n work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided\n that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial\n advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on\n the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work\n must be honored. For all other uses, contact the\n owner\\hspace*{.5pt}/author(s).\n \\or % usgov\n This paper is authored by an employee(s) of the United States\n Government and is in the public domain. Non-exclusive copying or\n redistribution is allowed, provided that the article citation is\n given and the authors and agency are clearly identified as its\n source. Request permissions from\n owner\\hspace*{.5pt}/author(s).\n \\or % usgovmixed\n ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored\n by an employee, contractor, or affiliate of the United States\n government. As such, the United States government retains a\n nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this\n article, or to allow others to do so, for government purposes\n only. Request permissions from owner\\hspace*{.5pt}/author(s).\n \\or % cagov\n This article was authored by employees of the Government of\n Canada. As such, the Canadian government retains all interest in\n the copyright to this work and grants to ACM a nonexclusive,\n royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to\n allow others to do so, provided that clear attribution is given\n both to the authors and the Canadian government agency employing\n them. Permission to make digital or hard copies for personal or\n classroom use is granted. Copies must bear this notice and the full\n citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work\n owned by others than the Canadian Government must be honored. To\n copy otherwise, distribute, republish, or post, requires prior\n specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from\n owner\\hspace*{.5pt}/author(s).\n \\or % cagovmixed\n ACM acknowledges that this contribution was co-authored by an\n affiliate of the national government of Canada. As such, the Crown\n in Right of Canada retains an equal interest in the\n copyright. Reprints must include clear attribution to ACM and the\n author’s government agency affiliation. Permission to make digital\n or hard copies for personal or classroom use is granted. Copies\n must bear this notice and the full citation on the first\n page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than\n ACM must be honored. To copy otherwise, distribute, republish, or\n post, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request\n permissions from owner\\hspace*{.5pt}/author(s).\n \\or % licensedusgovmixed\n Publication rights licensed to ACM\\@. ACM acknowledges that this\n contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor\n or affiliate of the United States government. As such, the\n Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or\n reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government\n purposes only. Request permissions from\n owner\\hspace*{.5pt}/author(s).\n \\or % licensedcagov\n This article was authored by employees of the Government of\n Canada. As such, the Canadian government retains all interest in\n the copyright to this work and grants to ACM a nonexclusive,\n royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to\n allow others to do so, provided that clear attribution is given\n both to the authors and the Canadian government agency employing\n them. Permission to make digital or hard copies for personal or\n classroom use is granted. Copies must bear this notice and the full\n citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work\n owned by others than the Canadian Government must be honored. To\n copy otherwise, distribute, republish, or post, requires prior\n specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from\n owner\\hspace*{.5pt}/author(s).\n \\or % licensedcagovmixed\n Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this\n contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor\n or affiliate of the national government of Canada. As such, the\n Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or\n reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government\n purposes only. Request permissions from\n owner\\hspace*{.5pt}/author(s).\n \\or % othergov\n ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored\n by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national\n government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive,\n royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to\n allow others to do so, for Government purposes only. Request\n permissions from owner\\hspace*{.5pt}/author(s).\n \\or % licensedothergov\n Publication rights licensed to ACM\\@. ACM acknowledges that this\n contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor\n or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government\n retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce\n this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes\n only. Request permissions from owner\\hspace*{.5pt}/author(s).\n \\or % iw3c2w3\n This paper is published under the Creative Commons Attribution~4.0\n International (CC-BY~4.0) license. Authors reserve their rights to\n disseminate the work on their personal and corporate Web sites with\n the appropriate attribution.\n \\or % iw3c2w3g\n This paper is published under the Creative Commons\n Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs~4.0 International\n (CC-BY-NC-ND~4.0) license. Authors reserve their rights to\n disseminate the work on their personal and corporate Web sites with\n the appropriate attribution.\n \\or % CC\n \\IfEq{\\ACM@cc@type}{zero}{%\n \\def\\ACM@CC@Url{https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0}}{%\n \\edef\\ACM@CC@Url{https://creativecommons.org/licenses/\\ACM@cc@type/\\ACM@cc@version}}%\n \\href{\\ACM@CC@Url}{\\includegraphics[height=5ex]{doclicense-CC-\\ACM@cc@type-88x31}}\\\\\n \\href{\\ACM@CC@Url}{%\n This work is licensed under a Creative Commons\n \\IfEq{\\ACM@cc@type}{zero}{CC0 1.0 Universal}{%\n \\IfEq{\\ACM@cc@type}{by}{Attribution}{}%\n \\IfEq{\\ACM@cc@type}{by-sa}{Attribution-ShareAlike}{}%\n \\IfEq{\\ACM@cc@type}{by-nd}{Attribution-NoDerivatives}{}%\n \\IfEq{\\ACM@cc@type}{by-nc}{Attribution-NonCommercial}{}%\n \\IfEq{\\ACM@cc@type}{by-nc-sa}{Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike}{}%\n \\IfEq{\\ACM@cc@type}{by-nc-nd}{Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives}{}%\n ~\\IfEq{\\ACM@cc@version}{4.0}{4.0 International}{3.0 Unported}%\n }\n License.}%\n \\fi}\n%%\n\\def\\copyrightyear#1{\\def\\@copyrightyear{#1}}\n\\copyrightyear{\\@acmYear}\n\\def\\@teaserfigures{}\n\\newenvironment{teaserfigure}{\\Collect@Body\\@saveteaser}{}\n\\long\\def\\@saveteaser#1{\\g@addto@macro\\@teaserfigures{\\@teaser{#1}}}\n\\renewcommand{\\thanks}[1]{%\n \\@ifnotempty{#1}{%\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\n \\g@addto@macro\\thankses{\\thanks{A note}}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\thankses{\\thanks{#1}}%\n \\fi}}\n\\newcommand{\\anon}[2][ANONYMIZED]{%\n \\if@ACM@anonymous%\n {\\color{ACMOrange}#1}%\n \\else%\n #2%\n \\fi}\n\\ifx\\@beginmaketitlehook\\@undefined\n \\let\\@beginmaketitlehook\\@empty\n\\fi\n\\def\\AtBeginMaketitle{\\g@addto@macro\\@beginmaketitlehook}\n\\def\\@acmengagemetadata{}\n\\def\\setengagemetadata#1#2{%\n \\g@addto@macro{\\@acmengagemetadata}{%\n \\@setengagemetadata{#1}{#2}}}\n\\newbox\\mktitle@bx\n\\def\\maketitle{\\@beginmaketitlehook\n \\@ACM@maketitle@typesettrue\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\n % Anonymize omission of \\author-s\n \\ifnum\\num@authorgroups=0\\author{}\\fi\n \\fi\n \\begingroup\n \\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig\n \\let\\@footnotemark\\@footnotemark@nolink\n \\let\\@footnotetext\\@footnotetext@nolink\n \\renewcommand\\thefootnote{\\@fnsymbol\\c@footnote}%\n \\hsize=\\textwidth\n \\def\\@makefnmark{\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\@thefnmark}}}%\n \\@mktitle\\if@ACM@sigchiamode\\else\\@mkauthors\\fi\\@mkteasers\n \\@printtopmatter\n \\if@ACM@sigchiamode\\@mkauthors\\fi\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}%\n \\def\\@makefnmark{\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont\\@thefnmark}}}%\n \\@titlenotes\n \\@subtitlenotes\n \\@authornotes\n \\let\\@makefnmark\\relax\n \\let\\@thefnmark\\relax\n \\let\\@makefntext\\noindent\n \\ifx\\@empty\\thankses\\else\n \\footnotetextauthorsaddresses{%\n \\def\\par{\\let\\par\\@par}\\parindent\\z@\\@setthanks}%\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@acmcp\\else\n \\ifx\\@empty\\@authorsaddresses\\else\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\\else\n \\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip@or@tog\n \\footnotetextauthorsaddresses{%\n \\def\\par{\\let\\par\\@par}\\parindent\\z@\\@setauthorsaddresses}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=15\\relax % cc\n \\footnotetextcopyrightpermission{\\@copyrightpermission}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\if@ACM@acmcp\\else\n \\footnotetextcopyrightpermission{%\n \\if@ACM@authordraft\n \\raisebox{-2ex}[\\z@][\\z@]{\\makebox[0pt][l]{\\large\\bfseries\n Unpublished working draft. Not for distribution.}}%\n \\color[gray]{0.9}%\n \\fi\n \\parindent\\z@\\parskip0.1\\baselineskip\n \\if@ACM@authorversion\\else\n \\if@printpermission\\@copyrightpermission\\par\\fi\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@manuscript\\else\n \\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip\\else % Print the conference information\n \\if@ACM@engage\n {\\itshape \\@acmBooktitle, \\@acmYear.}\\par\n \\else\n {\\itshape \\acmConference@shortname, \\acmConference@venue}\\par\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\if@printcopyright\n \\copyright\\ \\@copyrightyear\\ \\@copyrightowner\\\\\n \\else\n \\ifx\\@copyrightyear\\@empty\\else\n \\@copyrightyear.\\\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@manuscript\n Manuscript submitted to ACM\\\\\n \\else\n \\if@ACM@authorversion\n This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for\n your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive Version\n of Record was published in\n \\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip\n \\emph{\\@journalName}%\n \\else\n \\emph{\\@acmBooktitle}%\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@acmDOI\\@empty\n .\n \\else\n , \\@formatdoi{\\@acmDOI}.\n \\fi\\\\\n \\else\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\n \\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip\n ACM~\\@permissionCodeTwo/\\@acmYear/\\@acmMonth-ART\\@acmArticle\\\\\n \\@formatdoi{\\@acmDOI}%\n \\else % Conference\n \\ifx\\@acmISBN\\@empty\\else ACM~ISBN~\\@acmISBN\\\\\\fi\n \\ifx\\@acmDOI\\@empty\\else\\@formatdoi{\\@acmDOI}\\fi%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\if@ACM@engage\\@typesetengagemetadata\\fi\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}%\n \\@mkabstract\n \\ifx\\@translatedabstracts\\@empty\\else\n \\@translatedabstracts\\fi\n \\if@ACM@printccs\n \\ifx\\@concepts\\@empty\\else\\bgroup\n {\\@specialsection{CCS Concepts}%\n \\noindent\\@concepts\\par}\\egroup\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@acmcp\\else\n \\ifx\\@keywords\\@empty\\else\\bgroup\n {\\@specialsection{\\keywordsname}%\n \\noindent\\@keywords\\par}\\egroup\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@translatedkeywords\\@empty\\else\n \\@translatedkeywords\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\let\\metadata@authors=\\authors\n \\nxandlist{, }{, }{, }\\metadata@authors\n \\def\\@ACM@checkaffil{}%\n \\hypersetup{%\n pdfauthor={\\metadata@authors},\n pdftitle={\\@title},\n pdfsubject={\\@concepts},\n pdfkeywords={\\@keywords},\n pdfcreator={LaTeX with acmart\n \\csname ver@\\@classname.cls\\endcsname\\space\n and hyperref\n \\csname ver@hyperref.sty\\endcsname}}%\n \\andify\\authors\n \\andify\\shortauthors\n \\global\\let\\authors=\\authors\n \\global\\let\\shortauthors=\\shortauthors\n \\if@ACM@printacmref\n \\@mkbibcitation\n \\fi\n \\global\\@topnum\\z@ % this prevents floats from falling\n % at the top of page 1\n \\global\\@botnum\\z@ % we do not want them to be on the bottom either\n \\@printendtopmatter\n \\@afterindentfalse\n \\@afterheading\n \\if@ACM@acmcp\n \\set@ACM@acmcpbox\n \\AtEndDocument{\\end@ACM@color@frame}%\n \\@ACM@color@frame\n \\fi\n}\n\\newbox\\@ACM@acmcpbox\n\\def\\set@ACM@acmcpbox{%\n \\bgroup\n \\hsize=5pc\n \\global\\setbox\\@ACM@acmcpbox=\\vbox{%\n \\setlength{\\parindent}{\\z@}%\n {\\includegraphics[width=\\hsize]{acm-jdslogo}\\par}%\n \\scriptsize\n \\ifnum\\getrefnumber{TotPages}>1\\else\n \\zrefused{@ACM@acmcpbox@y}%\n \\zrefused{@ACM@acmcpframe@y}%\n \\@tempdima=\\dimexpr\\zposy{@ACM@acmcpbox@y}sp -\n \\zposy{@ACM@acmcpframe@y}sp+0.3\\FrameSep+\n \\@ACM@acmcp@delta\\relax\n \\ifdim\\@tempdima>0pt\\relax\n \\vspace*{\\@tempdima}%\n \\protected@write\\@auxout{}%\n {\\string\\global\\@ACM@acmcp@delta=\\the\\@tempdima\\relax}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@acmCodeDataLink\\@empty\\else\\bigskip\n Code and data links:\\\\ \\@acmCodeDataLink\\par\\bigskip\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@keywords\\@empty\\else\\bigskip\n Keywords: \\@keywords\\par\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@acmContributions\\@empty\\else\\bigskip\n \\@acmContributions\\par\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@empty\\@authorsaddresses\\else\\bigskip\\@setauthorsaddresses\\fi\n \\zsaveposy{@ACM@acmcpbox@y}%\n \\par\n }\n\\egroup}\n\\def\\@specialsection#1{%\n \\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\par\\medskip\\small\\noindent#1: %\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\par\\medskip\\small\\noindent#1: %\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\par\\medskip\\small\\noindent#1: %\n \\or % acmtog\n \\par\\medskip\\small\\noindent#1: %\n \\or % sigconf\n \\section*{#1}%\n \\or % siggraph\n \\section*{#1}%\n \\or % sigplan\n \\noindentparagraph*{#1:~}%\n \\or % sigchi\n \\section*{#1}%\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\section*{#1}%\n \\or % acmengage\n \\section*{#1}%\n \\or % acmcp\n \\section*{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@acm\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@acm\n}\n\\def\\@printtopmatter{%\n \\ifx\\@startPage\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@startPage{1}%\n \\else\n \\setcounter{page}{\\@startPage}%\n \\fi\n \\@tempdima=\\ht\\mktitle@bx\n \\advance\\@tempdima by \\dp\\mktitle@bx\n \\ifdim\\@tempdima>0.9\\textheight\n \\loop\n \\setbox\\@tempboxa=\\vsplit \\mktitle@bx to 0.9\\textheight\n \\thispagestyle{firstpagestyle}%\n \\noindent\\unvbox\\@tempboxa\n \\clearpage\n \\@tempdima=\\ht\\mktitle@bx\n \\advance\\@tempdima by \\dp\\mktitle@bx\n \\ifdim\\@tempdima>0.9\\textheight\\repeat\n \\fi\n \\thispagestyle{firstpagestyle}%\n \\noindent\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\box\\mktitle@bx\\par\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\box\\mktitle@bx\\par\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\box\\mktitle@bx\\par\n \\or % acmtog\n \\twocolumn[\\box\\mktitle@bx]%\n \\or % sigconf\n \\twocolumn[\\box\\mktitle@bx]%\n \\or % siggraph\n \\twocolumn[\\box\\mktitle@bx]%\n \\or % sigplan\n \\twocolumn[\\box\\mktitle@bx]%\n \\or % sigchi\n \\twocolumn[\\box\\mktitle@bx]%\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\par\\box\\mktitle@bx\\par\\bigskip\n \\or % acmengage\n \\twocolumn[\\box\\mktitle@bx]%\n \\or % acmcp\n \\box\\mktitle@bx\\par\n \\fi\n}\n\\def\\@mktitle{%\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\@mktitle@i\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\@mktitle@i\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\@mktitle@i\n \\or % acmtog\n \\@mktitle@i\n \\or % sigconf\n \\@mktitle@iii\n \\or % siggraph\n \\@mktitle@iii\n \\or % sigplan\n \\@mktitle@iii\n \\or % sigchi\n \\@mktitle@iii\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\@mktitle@iv\n \\or % acmengage\n \\@mktitle@iii\n \\or % acmcp\n \\@mktitle@i\n \\fi\n}\n\\def\\@titlefont{%\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\LARGE\\sffamily\\bfseries\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\LARGE\\sffamily\\bfseries\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\LARGE\\sffamily\\bfseries\n \\or % acmtog\n \\Huge\\sffamily\n \\or % sigconf\n \\Huge\\sffamily\\bfseries\n \\or % siggraph\n \\Huge\\sffamily\\bfseries\n \\or % sigplan\n \\Huge\\bfseries\n \\or % sigchi\n \\Huge\\sffamily\\bfseries\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\Huge\\bfseries\n \\or % acmengage\n \\Huge\\sffamily\\bfseries\n \\or % acmcp\n \\LARGE\\sffamily\\bfseries\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@subtitlefont{\\normalsize\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\mdseries\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\mdseries\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\mdseries\n \\or % acmtog\n \\LARGE\n \\or % sigconf\n \\LARGE\\mdseries\n \\or % siggraph\n \\LARGE\\mdseries\n \\or % sigplan\n \\LARGE\\mdseries\n \\or % sigchi\n \\LARGE\\mdseries\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\mdseries\n \\or % acmengage\n \\LARGE\\mdseries\n \\or % acmcp\n \\mdseries\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@mktitle@i{\\hsize=\\textwidth\n \\if@ACM@acmcp\n \\advance\\hsize by -6pc%\n \\fi\n \\@ACM@title@width=\\hsize\n \\setbox\\mktitle@bx=\\vbox{\\noindent\\@titlefont\n \\parbox[t]{\\@ACM@title@width}{\\raggedright\n \\@titlefont\\noindent\n \\@title\\@translatedtitle%\n \\ifx\\@subtitle\\@empty\\else\n \\par\\noindent{\\@subtitlefont\\@subtitle\\@translatedsubtitle}%\n \\fi}%\n \\par\\bigskip}}%\n\\def\\@mktitle@iii{\\hsize=\\textwidth\n \\setbox\\mktitle@bx=\\vbox{\\@titlefont\\centering\n \\@ACM@title@width=\\hsize\n \\parbox[t]{\\@ACM@title@width}{\\centering\\@titlefont\n \\@title\\@translatedtitle%\n \\ifx\\@subtitle\\@empty\\else\n \\par\\noindent{\\@subtitlefont\\@subtitle\\@translatedsubtitle}\n \\fi\n }%\n \\par\\bigskip}}%\n\\def\\@mktitle@iv{\\hsize=\\textwidth\n \\setbox\\mktitle@bx=\\vbox{\\raggedright\\leftskip5pc\\@titlefont\n \\noindent\\leavevmode\\leaders\\hrule height 2pt\\hfill\\kern0pt\\par\n \\noindent\\@title\\@translatedtitle%\n \\ifx\\@subtitle\\@empty\\else\n \\par\\noindent\\@subtitlefont\\@subtitle\\@translatedsubtitle%\n \\fi\n \\par\\bigskip}}%\n\\newbox\\@ACM@commabox\n\\def\\@ACM@addtoaddress#1{%\n \\ifvmode\\else\n \\if@ACM@affiliation@obeypunctuation\\else\n \\setbox\\@ACM@commabox=\\hbox{, }%\n \\unskip\\cleaders\\copy\\@ACM@commabox\\hskip\\wd\\@ACM@commabox\n \\fi\\fi\n #1}\n\\def\\streetaddress#1{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{ACM no longer collects\n authors' postal addresses. I am ignoring your street\n address}\\unskip\\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\postcode#1{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{ACM no longer collects\n authors' postal addresses. I am ignoring your postal\n code}\\unskip\\ignorespaces}\n\\if@ACM@journal\n \\def\\position#1{\\unskip\\ignorespaces}\n \\def\\institution#1{\\global\\@ACM@instpresenttrue\n \\unskip~#1\\ignorespaces}\n \\def\\city#1{\\global\\@ACM@citypresenttrue\\unskip\\ignorespaces}\n \\def\\state#1{\\unskip\\ignorespaces}\n \\newcommand\\department[2][0]{\\unskip\\ignorespaces}\n \\def\\country#1{\\StrDel{#1}{ }[\\@tempa]%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty\\else\n \\global\\@ACM@countrypresenttrue\\fi\n \\if@ACM@affiliation@obeypunctuation\\else, \\fi#1\\ignorespaces}\n\\else\n \\def\\position#1{\\if@ACM@affiliation@obeypunctuation#1\\else#1\\par\\fi}%\n \\def\\institution#1{\\global\\@ACM@instpresenttrue\n \\if@ACM@affiliation@obeypunctuation#1\\else#1\\par\\fi}%\n \\newcommand\\department[2][0]{\\if@ACM@affiliation@obeypunctuation\n #2\\else#2\\par\\fi}%\n \\def\\city#1{\\global\\@ACM@citypresenttrue\\@ACM@addtoaddress{#1}}%\n \\let\\state\\@ACM@addtoaddress\n \\def\\country#1{\\global\\@ACM@countrypresenttrue\\@ACM@addtoaddress{#1}}%\n\\fi\n\\def\\@mkauthors{\\begingroup\n \\hsize=\\textwidth\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\@mkauthors@i\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\@mkauthors@i\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\@mkauthors@i\n \\or % acmtog\n \\@mkauthors@i\n \\or % sigconf\n \\@mkauthors@iii\n \\or % siggraph\n \\@mkauthors@iii\n \\or % sigplan\n \\@mkauthors@iii\n \\or % sigchi\n \\@mkauthors@iii\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\@mkauthors@iv\n \\or % acmengage\n \\@mkauthors@iii\n \\or % acmcp\n \\@mkauthors@i\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n}\n\\def\\@authorfont{\\Large\\sffamily}\n\\def\\@affiliationfont{\\normalsize\\normalfont}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n \\def\\@authorfont{\\large\\sffamily}\n \\def\\@affiliationfont{\\small\\normalfont}\n\\or % acmlarge\n\\or % acmtog\n \\def\\@authorfont{\\LARGE\\sffamily}\n \\def\\@affiliationfont{\\large}\n\\or % sigconf\n \\def\\@authorfont{\\LARGE}\n \\def\\@affiliationfont{\\large}\n\\or % siggraph\n \\def\\@authorfont{\\normalsize\\normalfont}\n \\def\\@affiliationfont{\\normalsize\\normalfont}\n\\or % sigplan\n \\def\\@authorfont{\\Large\\normalfont}\n \\def\\@affiliationfont{\\normalsize\\normalfont}\n\\or % sigchi\n \\def\\@authorfont{\\bfseries}\n \\def\\@affiliationfont{\\mdseries}\n\\or % sigchi-a\n \\def\\@authorfont{\\bfseries}\n \\def\\@affiliationfont{\\mdseries}\n\\or % acmengage\n \\def\\@authorfont{\\LARGE}\n \\def\\@affiliationfont{\\large}\n\\or % acmcp\n \\def\\@authorfont{\\large\\sffamily}\n \\def\\@affiliationfont{\\small\\normalfont}\n\\fi\n\\def\\@typeset@author@line{%\n \\andify\\@currentauthors\\par\\noindent\n \\@currentauthors\\def\\@currentauthors{}%\n \\ifx\\@currentaffiliations\\@empty\\else\n \\andify\\@currentaffiliations\n \\unskip, {\\@currentaffiliations}\\par\n \\fi\n \\def\\@currentaffiliations{}}\n\\newif\\if@ACM@instpresent\n\\@ACM@instpresenttrue\n\\newif\\if@ACM@citypresent\n\\@ACM@citypresenttrue\n\\newif\\if@ACM@countrypresent\n\\@ACM@countrypresenttrue\n\\def\\@ACM@resetaffil{%\n \\global\\@ACM@instpresentfalse\n \\global\\@ACM@citypresentfalse\n \\global\\@ACM@countrypresentfalse\n}\n\\def\\@ACM@checkaffil{%\n \\if@ACM@instpresent\\else\n \\ClassWarningNoLine{\\@classname}{No institution present for an affiliation}%\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@citypresent\\else\n \\ClassWarningNoLine{\\@classname}{No city present for an affiliation}%\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@countrypresent\\else\n \\ClassError{\\@classname}{No country present for an affiliation}{ACM\n requires each author to indicate their country using country macro.}%\n \\fi\n}\n\\def\\@mkauthors@i{%\n \\def\\@currentauthors{}%\n \\def\\@currentaffiliations{}%\n \\global\\let\\and\\@typeset@author@line\n \\def\\@author##1{%\n \\ifx\\@currentauthors\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@currentauthors{\\@authorfont\\MakeUppercase{##1}}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro{\\@currentauthors}{\\and\\MakeUppercase{##1}}%\n \\fi\n \\gdef\\and{}}%\n \\def\\email##1##2{}%\n \\def\\affiliation##1##2{%\n \\def\\@tempa{##2}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty\\else\n \\ifx\\@currentaffiliations\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@currentaffiliations{%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{obeypunctuation=false}%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{##1}%\n \\@ACM@resetaffil\n \\@affiliationfont##2\\@ACM@checkaffil}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro{\\@currentaffiliations}{\\and\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{obeypunctuation=false}%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{##1}\\@ACM@resetaffil\n ##2\\@ACM@checkaffil}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\global\\let\\and\\@typeset@author@line}%\n \\if@ACM@acmcp\n \\advance\\hsize by -6pc%\n \\fi\n \\global\\setbox\\mktitle@bx=\\vbox{\\noindent\\unvbox\\mktitle@bx\\par\\medskip\n \\noindent\\addresses\\@typeset@author@line\n \\par\\medskip}%\n}\n\\newbox\\author@bx\n\\newdimen\\author@bx@wd\n\\newskip\\author@bx@sep\n\\author@bx@sep=1pc\\relax\n\\def\\@typeset@author@bx{\\bgroup\\hsize=\\author@bx@wd\n \\def\\and{\\par}\\normalbaselines\n \\global\\setbox\\author@bx=\\vtop{\\if@ACM@sigchiamode\\else\\centering\\fi\n \\@authorfont\\@currentauthors\\par\\@affiliationfont\n \\@currentaffiliation}\\egroup\n \\box\\author@bx\\hspace{\\author@bx@sep}%\n \\gdef\\@currentauthors{}%\n \\gdef\\@currentaffiliation{}}\n\\def\\@mkauthors@iii{%\n \\author@bx@wd=\\textwidth\\relax\n \\advance\\author@bx@wd by -\\author@bx@sep\\relax\n \\ifnum\\@ACM@authorsperrow>0\\relax\n \\divide\\author@bx@wd by \\@ACM@authorsperrow\\relax\n \\else\n \\ifcase\\num@authorgroups\n \\relax % 0?\n \\or % 1=one author per row\n \\or % 2=two authors per row\n \\divide\\author@bx@wd by \\num@authorgroups\\relax\n \\or % 3=three authors per row\n \\divide\\author@bx@wd by \\num@authorgroups\\relax\n \\or % 4=two authors per row (!)\n \\divide\\author@bx@wd by 2\\relax\n \\else % three authors per row\n \\divide\\author@bx@wd by 3\\relax\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\advance\\author@bx@wd by -\\author@bx@sep\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentauthors{}%\n \\gdef\\@currentaffiliation{}%\n \\def\\@author##1{\\ifx\\@currentauthors\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@currentauthors{\\par##1}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\@currentauthors{\\par##1}%\n \\fi\n \\gdef\\and{}}%\n \\def\\email##1##2{\\ifx\\@currentaffiliation\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@currentaffiliation{\\bgroup\n \\mathchardef\\UrlBreakPenalty=10000\\nolinkurl{##2}\\egroup}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\@currentaffiliation{\\par\\bgroup\n \\mathchardef\\UrlBreakPenalty=10000\\nolinkurl{##2}\\egroup}%\n \\fi}%\n \\def\\affiliation##1##2{\\ifx\\@currentaffiliation\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@currentaffiliation{%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{obeypunctuation=false}%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{##1}\\@ACM@resetaffil\n ##2\\@ACM@checkaffil}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\@currentaffiliation{\\par\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{obeypunctuation=false}%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{##1}\\@ACM@resetaffil\n ##2\\@ACM@checkaffil}%\n \\fi\n \\global\\let\\and\\@typeset@author@bx\n}%\n \\hsize=\\textwidth\n \\global\\setbox\\mktitle@bx=\\vbox{\\noindent\n \\unvbox\\mktitle@bx\\par\\medskip\\leavevmode\n \\lineskip=1pc\\relax\\centering\\hspace*{-1em}%\n \\addresses\\let\\and\\@typeset@author@bx\\and\\par\\bigskip}}\n\\def\\@mkauthors@iv{%\n \\author@bx@wd=\\columnwidth\\relax\n \\advance\\author@bx@wd by -\\author@bx@sep\\relax\n \\ifnum\\@ACM@authorsperrow>0\\relax\n \\divide\\author@bx@wd by \\@ACM@authorsperrow\\relax\n \\else\n \\ifcase\\num@authorgroups\n \\relax % 0?\n \\or % 1=one author per row\n \\else % 2=two authors per row\n \\divide\\author@bx@wd by 2\\relax\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\advance\\author@bx@wd by -\\author@bx@sep\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentauthors{}%\n \\gdef\\@currentaffiliation{}%\n \\def\\@author##1{\\ifx\\@currentauthors\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@currentauthors{\\par##1}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\@currentauthors{\\par##1}%\n \\fi\n \\gdef\\and{}}%\n \\def\\email##1##2{\\ifx\\@currentaffiliation\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@currentaffiliation{\\nolinkurl{##2}}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\@currentaffiliation{\\par\\nolinkurl{##2}}%\n \\fi}%\n \\def\\affiliation##1##2{\\ifx\\@currentaffiliation\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@currentaffiliation{%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{obeypunctuation=false}%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{##1}\\@ACM@resetaffil\n ##2\\@ACM@checkaffil}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\@currentaffiliation{\\par\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{obeypunctuation=false}%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{##1}\\@ACM@resetaffil\n ##2\\@ACM@checkaffil}%\n \\fi\n \\global\\let\\and\\@typeset@author@bx}%\n \\bgroup\\hsize=\\columnwidth\n \\par\\raggedright\\leftskip=\\z@\n \\lineskip=1pc\\noindent\n \\addresses\\let\\and\\@typeset@author@bx\\and\\par\\bigskip\\egroup}\n\\def\\@mkauthorsaddresses{%\n \\ifnum\\num@authors>1\\relax\n Authors' \\else Author's \\fi\n Contact Information:\n \\bgroup\n \\def\\streetaddress##1{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{ACM no longer collects\n authors' postal addresses. I am ignoring your street\n address}\\unskip\\ignorespaces}%\n \\def\\postcode##1{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{ACM no longer collects\n authors' postal addresses. I am ignoring your postal\n code}\\unskip\\ignorespaces}%\n \\def\\position##1{\\unskip\\ignorespaces}%\n \\gdef\\@ACM@institution@separator{, }%\n \\def\\institution##1{\\unskip\\@ACM@institution@separator ##1\\gdef\\@ACM@institution@separator{ and }}%\n \\def\\city##1{\\unskip, ##1}%\n \\def\\state##1{\\unskip, ##1}%\n \\renewcommand\\department[2][0]{\\unskip\\@addpunct, ##2}%\n \\def\\country##1{\\unskip, ##1}%\n \\def\\and{\\unskip; \\gdef\\@ACM@institution@separator{, }}%\n \\def\\@author##1{##1}%\n \\def\\email##1##2{\\unskip, \\nolinkurl{##2}}%\n \\addresses\n \\egroup}\n\\AtEndDocument{\\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\\if@ACM@journal\n \\ifx\\@authorsaddresses\\@empty\n \\ClassWarningNoLine{\\@classname}{Authors'\n addresses are mandatory for ACM journals}%\n \\fi\\fi\\fi}\n\\def\\@setaddresses{}\n\\def\\@authornotemark{\\g@addto@macro\\@currentauthors{%\n \\advance\\hfuzz by 5pt\\relax\\footnotemark\\relax}}\n\\def\\@@authornotemark#1{\\g@addto@macro\\@currentauthors{%\n \\advance\\hfuzz by 5pt\\relax\\footnotemark[#1]}}\n\\def\\@mkteasers{%\n \\ifx\\@teaserfigures\\@empty\\else\n \\def\\@teaser##1{\\par\\bigskip\\bgroup\n \\captionsetup{type=figure}##1\\egroup\\par}\n \\global\\setbox\\mktitle@bx=\\vbox{\\noindent\\unvbox\\mktitle@bx\\par\n \\noindent\\@Description@presentfalse\n \\@teaserfigures\\par\\if@Description@present\\else\n \\global\\@undescribed@imagestrue\n \\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{A possible image without\n description}\\fi\n \\medskip}%\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@mkabstract{\\bgroup\n \\ifx\\@abstract\\@lempty\\else\n {\\phantomsection\\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\\abstractname}%\n \\if@ACM@journal\n \\everypar{\\setbox\\z@\\lastbox\\everypar{}}\\small\n \\else\n \\section*{\\abstractname}%\n \\fi\n \\ignorespaces\\@abstract\\par}%\n \\fi\\egroup}\n\\def\\@mktranslatedabstract#1{\\selectlanguage{#1}%\n \\if@ACM@journal\n \\everypar{\\setbox\\z@\\lastbox\\everypar{}}\\small\n \\else\n \\section*{\\abstractname}%\n \\fi\n \\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\@mkbibcitation{\\bgroup\n \\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig\n \\def\\@pages@word{\\ifnum\\getrefnumber{TotPages}=1\\relax page\\else pages\\fi}%\n \\def\\footnotemark{}%\n \\def\\\\{\\unskip{} \\ignorespaces}%\n \\def\\footnote{\\ClassError{\\@classname}{Please do not use footnotes\n inside a \\string\\title{} or \\string\\author{} command! Use\n \\string\\titlenote{} or \\string\\authornote{} instead!}}%\n \\def\\@article@string{\\ifx\\@acmArticle\\@empty{\\ }\\else,\n Article~\\@acmArticle\\ \\fi}%\n \\par\\medskip\\small\\noindent{\\bfseries ACM Reference Format:}\\par\\nobreak\n \\noindent\\bgroup\n \\def\\\\{\\unskip{}, \\ignorespaces}\\authors\\egroup. \\@acmYear. \\@title\n \\ifx\\@subtitle\\@empty. \\else: \\@subtitle. \\fi\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\n % The 'nonacm' option disables 'printacmref' by default,\n % and the present \\@mkbibcitation definition is never used\n % in this case. The conditional remains useful if the user\n % explicitly sets \\settopmatter{printacmref=true}.\n \\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip\n \\textit{\\@journalNameShort}\n \\@acmVolume, \\@acmNumber \\@article@string (\\@acmPubDate),\n \\ref{TotPages}~\\@pages@word.\n \\else\n In \\textit{\\@acmBooktitle}%\n \\ifx\\@acmEditors\\@empty\\textit{.}\\else\n \\andify\\@acmEditors\\textit{, }\\@acmEditors~\\@editorsAbbrev.%\n \\fi\\\n ACM, New York, NY, USA%\n \\@article@string\\unskip, \\ref{TotPages}~\\@pages@word.\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@acmDOI\\@empty\\else\\@formatdoi{\\@acmDOI}\\fi\n\\par\\egroup}\n\\def\\@printendtopmatter{%\n \\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig\n \\par\\bigskip\n \\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@acm\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@acm\n }\n\\def\\@setthanks{\\long\\def\\thanks##1{\\par##1\\@addpunct.}\\thankses}\n\\def\\@setauthorsaddresses{\\@authorsaddresses\\unskip\\@addpunct.}\n\\def\\@typesetengagemetadata{%\n \\def\\@setengagemetadata##1##2{\\par\\noindent\\textbf{##1} ##2\\par}%\n \\@acmengagemetadata}\n\\RequirePackage{fancyhdr}\n\\let\\ACM@ps@plain\\ps@plain\n\\let\\ACM@ps@myheadings\\ps@myheadings\n\\let\\ACM@ps@headings\\ps@headings\n\\def\\ACM@restore@pagestyle{%\n \\let\\ps@plain\\ACM@ps@plain\n \\let\\ps@myheadings\\ACM@ps@myheadings\n \\let\\ps@headings\\ACM@ps@headings}\n\\AtBeginDocument{\\ACM@restore@pagestyle}\n\\if@ACM@review\n \\newsavebox{\\ACM@linecount@bx}\n \\newlength\\ACM@linecount@bxht\n \\newcount\\ACM@linecount\n \\ACM@linecount\\@ne\\relax\n \\def\\ACM@mk@linecount{%\n \\savebox{\\ACM@linecount@bx}[4em][t]{\\parbox[t]{4em}{\\normalfont\n \\normalsize\n \\setlength{\\ACM@linecount@bxht}{0pt}%\n \\loop{\\color{red}\\scriptsize\\the\\ACM@linecount}\\\\\n \\global\\advance\\ACM@linecount by \\@ne\n \\addtolength{\\ACM@linecount@bxht}{\\baselineskip}%\n \\ifdim\\ACM@linecount@bxht<\\textheight\\repeat\n {\\color{red}\\scriptsize\\the\\ACM@linecount}\\hfill\n \\global\\advance\\ACM@linecount by \\@ne}}}\n\\fi\n\\def\\ACM@linecountL{%\n \\if@ACM@review\n \\ACM@mk@linecount\n \\begin{picture}(0,0)%\n \\put(-26,-22){\\usebox{\\ACM@linecount@bx}}%\n \\end{picture}%\n \\fi}\n\\def\\ACM@linecountR{%\n \\if@ACM@review\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\relax\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\relax\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\relax\n \\or % acmtog\n \\ACM@mk@linecount\n \\or % sigconf\n \\ACM@mk@linecount\n \\or % siggraph\n \\ACM@mk@linecount\n \\or % sigplan\n \\ACM@mk@linecount\n \\or % sigchi\n \\ACM@mk@linecount\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\ACM@mk@linecount\n \\or % acmengage\n \\ACM@mk@linecount\n \\or % acmcp\n \\relax\n \\fi\n \\begin{picture}(0,0)%\n \\put(20,-22){\\usebox{\\ACM@linecount@bx}}%\n \\end{picture}%\n \\fi}\n\\if@ACM@timestamp\n % Subtracting 30 from \\time gives us the effect of rounding down despite\n % \\numexpr rounding to nearest\n \\newcounter{ACM@time@hours}\n \\setcounter{ACM@time@hours}{\\numexpr (\\time - 30) / 60 \\relax}\n \\newcounter{ACM@time@minutes}\n \\setcounter{ACM@time@minutes}{\\numexpr \\time - \\theACM@time@hours * 60 \\relax}\n \\newcommand\\ACM@timestamp{%\n \\footnotesize%\n \\ifx\\@acmSubmissionID\\@empty\\relax\\else\n Submission ID: \\@acmSubmissionID.{ }%\n \\fi\n \\the\\year-\\two@digits{\\the\\month}-\\two@digits{\\the\\day}{ }%\n \\two@digits{\\theACM@time@hours}:\\two@digits{\\theACM@time@minutes}{. }%\n Page \\thepage\\ of \\@startPage--\\pageref*{TotPages}.%\n }\n\\fi\n\\def\\@shortauthors{%\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\n Anon.\n \\ifx\\@acmSubmissionID\\@empty\\else Submission Id: \\@acmSubmissionID\\fi\n \\else\\shortauthors\\fi}\n\\def\\@headfootfont{\\sffamily\\footnotesize}\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n\\fancypagestyle{standardpagestyle}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\renewcommand{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\def\\@acmArticlePage{%\n \\ifx\\@acmArticle\\empty%\n \\if@ACM@printfolios\\thepage\\fi%\n \\else%\n \\@acmArticle\\if@ACM@printfolios:\\thepage\\fi%\n \\fi%\n }%\n \\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip@or@tog\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\if@ACM@printfolios\\thepage\\fi}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\if@ACM@printfolios\\thepage\\fi}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\@shortauthors}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\ACM@linecountL\\shorttitle}%\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\footnotesize Manuscript submitted to ACM}\n \\fi%\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\\@acmArticlePage}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\@headfootfont\\@acmArticlePage}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\@headfootfont\\@shortauthors}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\\shorttitle}%\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\footnotesize \\@journalNameShort, Vol. \\@acmVolume, No.\n \\@acmNumber, Article \\@acmArticle. Publication date: \\@acmPubDate.}%\n \\fi\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\n \\@acmArticlePage\\quad\\textbullet\\quad\\@shortauthors}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\ACM@linecountL}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\@headfootfont\n \\shorttitle\\quad\\textbullet\\quad\\@acmArticlePage}%\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\footnotesize \\@journalNameShort, Vol. \\@acmVolume, No.\n \\@acmNumber, Article \\@acmArticle. Publication date: \\@acmPubDate.}%\n \\fi\n \\or % acmtog\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\n \\@acmArticlePage\\quad\\textbullet\\quad\\@shortauthors}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\ACM@linecountL}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\@headfootfont\n \\shorttitle\\quad\\textbullet\\quad\\@acmArticlePage\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\n \\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\footnotesize \\@journalNameShort,\n Vol. \\@acmVolume, No.~\\@acmNumber, Article \\@acmArticle.\n Publication date: \\@acmPubDate.}%\n \\else\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\footnotesize \\acmConference@shortname,\n \\acmConference@date, \\acmConference@venue.}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\else % Proceedings\n \\fancyfoot[C]{\\if@ACM@printfolios\\footnotesize\\thepage\\fi}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\\shorttitle}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\@headfootfont\\@shortauthors\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\else%\n \\if@ACM@engage\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\\footnotesize\n EngageCSEdu. \\ifx\\@acmDOI\\@empty\\else\\@formatdoi{\\@acmDOI}\\fi}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\@headfootfont\n EngageCSEdu. \\ifx\\@acmDOI\\@empty\\else\\@formatdoi{\\@acmDOI}\\fi\n \\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\else\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\\footnotesize\n \\acmConference@shortname,\n \\acmConference@date, \\acmConference@venue}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\@headfootfont\n \\acmConference@shortname,\n \\acmConference@date, \\acmConference@venue\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\else % Proceedings\n \\fancyfoot[C]{\\if@ACM@printfolios\\footnotesize\\thepage\\fi}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\\shorttitle}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\@headfootfont\\@shortauthors\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\else%\n \\if@ACM@engage\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\n EngageCSEdu. \\ifx\\@acmDOI\\@empty\\else\\@formatdoi{\\@acmDOI}\\fi}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\@headfootfont\n EngageCSEdu. \\ifx\\@acmDOI\\@empty\\else\\@formatdoi{\\@acmDOI}\\fi\n \\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\else\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\n \\acmConference@shortname,\n \\acmConference@date, \\acmConference@venue}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\@headfootfont\n \\acmConference@shortname,\n \\acmConference@date, \\acmConference@venue\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@sigchiamode\n \\fancyheadoffset[L]{\\dimexpr(\\marginparsep+\\marginparwidth)}%\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@timestamp\n \\fancyfoot[LO,RE]{\\ACM@timestamp}\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@acmcp\n \\renewcommand{\\footrulewidth}{0.1\\p@}%\n \\fancyheadoffset[L]{46pt}%\n \\fancyhead[L]{\\makebox[\\z@][l]{%\n \\raisebox{-\\dimexpr(0.2\\textheight*(\\ACM@ArticleType@nr-2))}{%\n \\rotatebox{90}{\\colorbox{@ACM@Article@color}{\\color{white}%\n \\strut\\ACM@ArticleType~Article}}}}%\n \\ACM@linecountL}%\n \\fancyhead[R]{\\makebox[\\z@][r]{\\box\\@ACM@acmcpbox}}%\n \\fancyfoot[L,C]{}%\n \\fancyfoot[R]{\\footnotesize\n \\@journalName, Volume~\\@acmVolume, Issue~\\@acmNumber,\n \\ifx\\@acmArticle\\@empty\\else Article~\\@acmArticle\\fi\\space\n (\\@acmPubDate)\\ifx\\@acmDOI\\@empty\\else\\\\\\@formatdoi{\\@acmDOI}\\fi}\n \\fi\n}%\n\\pagestyle{standardpagestyle}\n}\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n\\fancypagestyle{firstpagestyle}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\renewcommand{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip@or@tog\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\fancyhead[L]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@acmBadgeL}%\n \\fancyhead[R]{\\@acmBadgeR}%\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\if@ACM@printfolios\\small\\thepage\\fi}%\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\fancyfoot[RE,LO]{\\footnotesize Manuscript submitted to ACM}%\n \\fi%\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\footnotesize \\@journalNameShort, Vol. \\@acmVolume, No.\n \\@acmNumber, Article \\@acmArticle. Publication date:\n \\@acmPubDate.}%\n \\fi%\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@acmBadgeL}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@acmBadgeL}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\@acmBadgeR}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\@acmBadgeR}%\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\footnotesize \\@journalNameShort, Vol. \\@acmVolume, No.\n \\@acmNumber, Article \\@acmArticle. Publication date:\n \\@acmPubDate.}%\n \\fi%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\@acmBadgeR}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\@acmBadgeR}%\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@acmBadgeL}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@acmBadgeL}%\n \\or % acmtog\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\footnotesize \\@journalNameShort,\n Vol. \\@acmVolume, No.~\\@acmNumber, Article \\@acmArticle.\n Publication date: \\@acmPubDate.}%\n \\else\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\footnotesize \\acmConference@shortname,\n \\acmConference@date, \\acmConference@venue.}%\n \\fi\n \\fi%\n \\fancyhead[L]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@acmBadgeL}%\n \\fancyhead[R]{\\@acmBadgeR\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\else % Conference proceedings\n \\fancyhead[L]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@acmBadgeL}%\n \\fancyhead[R]{\\@acmBadgeR\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\fancyfoot[C]{\\if@ACM@printfolios\\footnotesize\\thepage\\fi}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\fancyhead[L]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@acmBadgeL}%\n \\fancyhead[R]{\\@acmBadgeR\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\fancyfoot[C]{\\if@ACM@printfolios\\footnotesize\\thepage\\fi}%\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@timestamp\n \\ifnum\\ACM@format@nr=0\\relax % Manuscript\n \\fancyfoot[LO,RE]{\\ACM@timestamp\\quad\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\n \\footnotesize Manuscript submitted to ACM\n \\fi}\n \\else\n \\fancyfoot[LO,RE]{\\ACM@timestamp}\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@acmcp\n \\renewcommand{\\footrulewidth}{0.1\\p@}%\n \\fancyheadoffset[L]{46pt}%\n \\fancyhead[L]{\\makebox[\\z@][l]{%\n \\raisebox{-\\dimexpr(0.2\\textheight*(\\ACM@ArticleType@nr-2))}{%\n \\rotatebox{90}{\\colorbox{@ACM@Article@color}{\\color{white}%\n \\strut\\ACM@ArticleType~Article}}}}%\n \\ACM@linecountL\\@acmBadgeL}%\n \\fancyhead[R]{\\@acmBadgeR\\makebox[\\z@][r]{\\box\\@ACM@acmcpbox}}%\n \\fancyfoot[L,C]{}%\n \\fancyfoot[R]{\\footnotesize\n \\@journalName, Volume~\\@acmVolume, Issue~\\@acmNumber,\n \\ifx\\@acmArticle\\@empty\\else Article~\\@acmArticle\\fi\\space\n (\\@acmPubDate)\\ifx\\@acmDOI\\@empty\\else\\\\\\@formatdoi{\\@acmDOI}\\fi}\n \\fi\n}}\n\\def\\ACM@NRadjust#1{%\n \\begingroup\n \\expandafter\\ifx\\csname Sectionformat\\endcsname\\relax\n % do nothing when \\Sectionformat is unknown\n \\def\\next{\\endgroup #1}%\n \\else\n \\def\\next{\\endgroup\n \\let\\realSectionformat\\Sectionformat\n \\def\\ACM@sect@format@{#1}%\n \\let\\Sectionformat\\ACM@NR@adjustedSectionformat\n %% next lines added 2018-06-17 to ensure section number is styled\n \\let\\real@adddotafter\\@adddotafter\n \\let\\@adddotafter\\ACM@adddotafter\n #1{}% imposes the styles, but nullifies \\MakeUppercase\n \\let\\@adddotafter\\real@adddotafter\n }%\n \\fi \\next\n}\n\\def\\ACM@NR@adjustedSectionformat#1#2{%\n \\realSectionformat{\\ACM@sect@format{#1}}{#2}%\n \\let\\Sectionformat\\realSectionformat}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand{\\ACM@sect@format}{\\ACM@sect@format@}\n\\def\\ACM@sect@format@null#1{#1}\n\\let\\ACM@sect@format@\\ACM@sect@format@null\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\expandafter\\ifx\\csname LTX@adddotafter\\endcsname\\relax\n \\let\\LTX@adddotafter\\@adddotafter\n \\fi\n}\n\\def\\ACM@adddotafter#1{\\ifx\\relax#1\\relax\\else\\LTX@adddotafter{#1}\\fi}\n\\renewcommand\\section{\\def\\@toclevel{1}%\n \\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}%\n {-.75\\baselineskip \\@plus -2\\p@ \\@minus -.2\\p@}%\n {.25\\baselineskip}%\n {\\ACM@NRadjust\\@secfont}}\n\\renewcommand\\subsection{\\def\\@toclevel{2}%\n \\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}%\n {-.75\\baselineskip \\@plus -2\\p@ \\@minus -.2\\p@}%\n {.25\\baselineskip}%\n {\\ACM@NRadjust\\@subsecfont}}\n\\renewcommand\\subsubsection{\\def\\@toclevel{3}%\n \\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}%\n {-.5\\baselineskip \\@plus -2\\p@ \\@minus -.2\\p@}%\n {-3.5\\p@}%\n {\\ACM@NRadjust{\\@subsubsecfont\\@adddotafter}}}\n\\renewcommand\\paragraph{\\def\\@toclevel{4}%\n \\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\parindent}%\n {-.5\\baselineskip \\@plus -2\\p@ \\@minus -.2\\p@}%\n {-3.5\\p@}%\n {\\ACM@NRadjust{\\@parfont\\@adddotafter}}}\n\\newcommand\\noindentparagraph{\\def\\@toclevel{4}%\n \\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}%\n {-.5\\baselineskip \\@plus -2\\p@ \\@minus -.2\\p@}%\n {-3.5\\p@}%\n {\\ACM@NRadjust{\\@parfont}}}\n\\renewcommand\\part{\\def\\@toclevel{9}%\n \\@startsection{part}{9}{\\z@}%\n {-10\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -2\\p@}%\n {4\\p@}%\n {\\ACM@NRadjust\\@parfont}}\n\\def\\section@raggedright{\\@rightskip\\@flushglue\n \\rightskip\\@rightskip\n \\leftskip\\z@skip\n \\parindent\\z@}\n\\def\\@secfont{\\sffamily\\bfseries\\section@raggedright}\n\\def\\@subsecfont{\\sffamily\\bfseries\\section@raggedright}\n\\def\\@subsubsecfont{\\sffamily\\itshape}\n\\def\\@parfont{\\itshape}\n\\setcounter{secnumdepth}{3}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n\\or % acmlarge\n \\def\\@secfont{\\sffamily\\large\\section@raggedright}\n \\def\\@subsecfont{\\sffamily\\large\\section@raggedright}\n\\or % acmtog\n \\def\\@secfont{\\sffamily\\large\\section@raggedright}\n \\def\\@subsecfont{\\sffamily\\large\\section@raggedright}\n\\or % sigconf\n \\def\\@secfont{\\bfseries\\Large\\section@raggedright}\n \\def\\@subsecfont{\\bfseries\\Large\\section@raggedright}\n\\or % siggraph\n \\def\\@secfont{\\sffamily\\bfseries\\Large\\section@raggedright}\n \\def\\@subsecfont{\\sffamily\\bfseries\\Large\\section@raggedright}\n\\or % sigplan\n \\def\\@secfont{\\bfseries\\Large\\section@raggedright}\n \\def\\@subsecfont{\\bfseries\\section@raggedright}\n \\def\\@subsubsecfont{\\bfseries\\section@raggedright}\n \\def\\@parfont{\\bfseries\\itshape}\n \\def\\@subparfont{\\itshape}\n\\or % sigchi\n \\setcounter{secnumdepth}{1}\n \\def\\@secfont{\\sffamily\\bfseries\\section@raggedright}\n \\def\\@subsecfont{\\sffamily\\bfseries\\section@raggedright}\n\\or % sigchi-a\n \\setcounter{secnumdepth}{0}\n \\def\\@secfont{\\sffamily\\bfseries\\section@raggedright}\n \\def\\@subsecfont{\\sffamily\\bfseries\\section@raggedright}\n\\or % acmengage\n \\def\\@secfont{\\bfseries\\Large\\section@raggedright}\n \\def\\@subsecfont{\\bfseries\\Large\\section@raggedright}\n\\or %acmcp\n\\fi\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\@for\\@tempa:=-1,0,1,2,3,4,5\\do{%\n \\@ifundefined{r@tocindent\\@tempa}{%\n \\@xp\\gdef\\csname r@tocindent\\@tempa\\endcsname{0pt}}{}%\n }%\n}\n\\def\\@writetocindents{%\n \\begingroup\n \\@for\\@tempa:=-1,0,1,2,3,4,5\\do{%\n \\immediate\\write\\@auxout{%\n \\string\\newlabel{tocindent\\@tempa}{%\n \\csname r@tocindent\\@tempa\\endcsname}}%\n }%\n \\endgroup}\n\\def\\@adddotafter#1{#1\\@addpunct{.}}\n\\def\\@addspaceafter#1{#1\\@addpunct{\\enspace}}\n\\if@ACM@acmcp\n \\setcounter{secnumdepth}{-1}%\n\\fi\n\\providecommand*\\@dotsep{4.5}\n\\def\\@acmplainbodyfont{\\itshape}\n\\def\\@acmplainindent{\\parindent}\n\\def\\@acmplainheadfont{\\scshape}\n\\def\\@acmplainnotefont{\\@empty}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n\\or % acmlarge\n\\or % acmtog\n\\or % sigconf\n\\or % siggraph\n\\or % sigplan\n \\def\\@acmplainbodyfont{\\itshape}\n \\def\\@acmplainindent{\\z@}\n \\def\\@acmplainheadfont{\\bfseries}\n \\def\\@acmplainnotefont{\\normalfont}\n\\or % sigchi\n\\or % sigchi-a\n\\or % acmengage\n\\or % acmcp\n\\fi\n\\newtheoremstyle{acmplain}%\n {.5\\baselineskip\\@plus.2\\baselineskip\n \\@minus.2\\baselineskip}% space above\n {.5\\baselineskip\\@plus.2\\baselineskip\n \\@minus.2\\baselineskip}% space below\n {\\@acmplainbodyfont}% body font\n {\\@acmplainindent}% indent amount\n {\\@acmplainheadfont}% head font\n {.}% punctuation after head\n {.5em}% spacing after head\n {\\thmname{#1}\\thmnumber{ #2}\\thmnote{ {\\@acmplainnotefont(#3)}}}% head spec\n\\def\\@acmdefinitionbodyfont{\\normalfont}\n\\def\\@acmdefinitionindent{\\parindent}\n\\def\\@acmdefinitionheadfont{\\itshape}\n\\def\\@acmdefinitionnotefont{\\@empty}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n\\or % acmlarge\n\\or % acmtog\n\\or % sigconf\n\\or % siggraph\n\\or % sigplan\n \\def\\@acmdefinitionbodyfont{\\normalfont}\n \\def\\@acmdefinitionindent{\\z@}\n \\def\\@acmdefinitionheadfont{\\bfseries}\n \\def\\@acmdefinitionnotefont{\\normalfont}\n\\or % sigchi\n\\or % sigchi-a\n\\or % acmengage\n\\or % acmcp\n\\fi\n\\newtheoremstyle{acmdefinition}%\n {.5\\baselineskip\\@plus.2\\baselineskip\n \\@minus.2\\baselineskip}% space above\n {.5\\baselineskip\\@plus.2\\baselineskip\n \\@minus.2\\baselineskip}% space below\n {\\@acmdefinitionbodyfont}% body font\n {\\@acmdefinitionindent}% indent amount\n {\\@acmdefinitionheadfont}% head font\n {.}% punctuation after head\n {.5em}% spacing after head\n {\\thmname{#1}\\thmnumber{ #2}\\thmnote{ {\\@acmdefinitionnotefont(#3)}}}% head spec\n\\theoremstyle{acmplain}\n\\AtEndPreamble{%\n \\if@ACM@acmthm\n \\theoremstyle{acmplain}\n \\@ifundefined{theorem}{%\n \\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]\n }{}\n \\@ifundefined{conjecture}{%\n \\newtheorem{conjecture}[theorem]{Conjecture}\n }{}\n \\@ifundefined{proposition}{%\n \\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}\n }{}\n \\@ifundefined{lemma}{%\n \\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}\n }{}\n \\@ifundefined{corollary}{%\n \\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}\n }{}\n \\theoremstyle{acmdefinition}\n \\@ifundefined{example}{%\n \\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}\n }{}\n \\@ifundefined{definition}{%\n \\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}\n }{}\n \\fi\n \\theoremstyle{acmplain}\n}\n\\def\\@proofnamefont{\\scshape}\n\\def\\@proofindent{\\indent}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n\\or % acmlarge\n\\or % acmtog\n\\or % sigconf\n\\or % siggraph\n\\or % sigplan\n \\def\\@proofnamefont{\\itshape}\n \\def\\@proofindent{\\noindent}\n\\or % sigchi\n\\or % sigchi-a\n\\or % acmengage\n\\or % acmcp\n\\fi\n\\renewenvironment{proof}[1][\\proofname]{\\par\n \\pushQED{\\qed}%\n \\normalfont \\topsep6\\p@\\@plus6\\p@\\relax\n \\trivlist\n \\item[\\@proofindent\\hskip\\labelsep\n {\\@proofnamefont #1\\@addpunct{.}}]\\ignorespaces\n}{%\n \\popQED\\endtrivlist\\@endpefalse\n}\n\\AtEndPreamble{%\n \\if@ACM@pbalance\n \\global\\@ACM@balancefalse\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\or % acmtog\n \\RequirePackage{pbalance}%\n \\or % sigconf\n \\RequirePackage{pbalance}%\n \\or % siggraph\n \\RequirePackage{pbalance}%\n \\or % sigplan\n \\RequirePackage{pbalance}%\n \\or % sigchi\n \\RequirePackage{pbalance}%\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\or % acmengage\n \\RequirePackage{pbalance}%\n \\or % acmcp\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@balance\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\global\\@ACM@balancefalse\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\global\\@ACM@balancefalse\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\global\\@ACM@balancefalse\n \\or % acmtog\n \\RequirePackage{balance}%\n \\or % sigconf\n \\RequirePackage{balance}%\n \\or % siggraph\n \\RequirePackage{balance}%\n \\or % sigplan\n \\RequirePackage{balance}%\n \\or % sigchi\n \\RequirePackage{balance}%\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\global\\@ACM@balancefalse\n \\or % acmengage\n \\RequirePackage{balance}%\n \\or % acmcp\n \\global\\@ACM@balancefalse\n \\fi\n \\fi\n}\n\\AtEndDocument{%\n \\if@ACM@balance\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\balance\n \\fi\\fi}\n\\newcommand\\acksname{Acknowledgments}\n\\specialcomment{acks}{%\n \\begingroup\n \\section*{\\acksname}\n \\phantomsection\\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\\acksname}\n}{%\n \\endgroup\n}\n\\def\\grantsponsor#1#2#3{#2}\n\\newcommand\\grantnum[3][]{#3%\n \\def\\@tempa{#1}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty\\else\\space(\\url{#1})\\fi}\n\\AtEndPreamble{%\n\\if@ACM@screen\n \\includecomment{screenonly}\n \\excludecomment{printonly}\n\\else\n \\excludecomment{screenonly}\n \\includecomment{printonly}\n\\fi\n\\if@ACM@anonymous\n \\excludecomment{anonsuppress}\n \\excludecomment{acks}\n\\else\n \\includecomment{anonsuppress}\n\\fi}\n\\newcommand\\showeprint[2][arxiv]{%\n \\def\\@tempa{#1}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty\\def\\@tempa{arxiv}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{arxiv}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\\relax\n arXiv:\\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/#2}{#2}%\n \\else\n \\def\\@tempb{arXiv}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\\relax\n arXiv:\\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/#2}{#2}%\n \\else\n #1:#2%\n \\fi\n \\fi}\n\\def\\theindex{\\@restonecoltrue\\if@twocolumn\\@restonecolfalse\\fi\n \\columnseprule\\z@ \\columnsep 35\\p@\n \\@indextitlestyle\n \\let\\item\\@idxitem\n \\parindent\\z@ \\parskip\\z@\\@plus.3\\p@\\relax\n \\raggedright\n \\hyphenpenalty\\@M\n \\footnotesize}\n\\let\\@vspace@orig=\\@vspace\n\\let\\@vspacer@orig=\\@vspacer\n\\apptocmd{\\@vspace}{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{\\string\\vspace\\space should\n only be used to provide space above/below surrounding\n objects}}{}{}\n\\apptocmd{\\@vspacer}{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{\\string\\vspace\\space should\n only be used to provide space above/below surrounding\n objects}}{}{}\n\\let\\@vspace@acm=\\@vspace\n\\let\\@vspacer@acm=\\@vspacer\n\\let\\ACM@origbaselinestretch\\baselinestretch\n\\AtEndDocument{\\ifx\\baselinestretch\\ACM@origbaselinestretch\\else\n \\ClassError{\\@classname}{An attempt to redefine\n \\string\\baselinestretch\\space detected. Please do not do this for\n ACM submissions!}\\fi}\n\\let\\ACM@origsection\\section\n\\AtEndDocument{\\ifx\\section\\ACM@origsection\\else\n \\ClassError{\\@classname}{An attempt to redefine\n \\string\\section\\space detected. Please do not do this for\n ACM submissions!}\\fi}\n\\let\\ACM@origsubsection\\subsection\n\\AtEndDocument{\\ifx\\subsection\\ACM@origsubsection\\else\n \\ClassError{\\@classname}{An attempt to redefine\n \\string\\subsection\\space detected. Please do not do this for\n ACM submissions!}\\fi}\n\\let\\ACM@origsubsubsection\\subsubsection\n\\AtEndDocument{\\ifx\\subsubsection\\ACM@origsubsubsection\\else\n \\ClassError{\\@classname}{An attempt to redefine\n \\string\\subsubsection\\space detected. Please do not do this for\n ACM submissions!}\\fi}\n\\let\\ACM@origparagraph\\paragraph\n\\AtEndDocument{\\ifx\\paragraph\\ACM@origparagraph\\else\n \\ClassError{\\@classname}{An attempt to redefine\n \\string\\paragraph\\space detected. Please do not do this for\n ACM submissions!}\\fi}\n\\normalsize\\normalfont\\frenchspacing\n\\endinput\n%%\n%% End of file `acmart.cls'.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: figures/pipeline.tex\n================================================\n% Faithful four-stage reproduction of the revised CoCoMUT pipeline.\n% Derived from the original TikZ pipeline source.\n%\n% Requires in the preamble:\n% \\usepackage{graphicx}\n% \\usepackage{tikz}\n% \\usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta,calc,positioning}\n%\n% The figure is drawn on a large natural canvas and scaled to the full text\n% width. This keeps the typography and spacing stable in ACM two-column mode.\n\n\\definecolor{CoBlue}{HTML}{1456C5}\n\\definecolor{CoBlueFill}{HTML}{F4F7FF}\n\\definecolor{CoGreen}{HTML}{138A2E}\n\\definecolor{CoGreenFill}{HTML}{F7FCF7}\n\\definecolor{CoPurple}{HTML}{6B2BA6}\n\\definecolor{CoPurpleFill}{HTML}{FBF8FD}\n\\definecolor{CoGold}{HTML}{D47A00}\n\\definecolor{CoGoldFill}{HTML}{FFFBF5}\n\\definecolor{CoOrange}{HTML}{E14F09}\n\\definecolor{CoOrangeFill}{HTML}{FFF9F5}\n\\definecolor{CoRed}{HTML}{D62620}\n\\definecolor{CoInk}{HTML}{202020}\n\\definecolor{CoGray}{HTML}{555555}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n\\centering\n\\resizebox{0.45\\textwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tikzpicture}[\n x=1cm,\n y=1cm,\n line cap=round,\n line join=round,\n font=\\sffamily,\n outer/.style={line width=1.05pt, rounded corners=8pt},\n inner/.style={line width=0.78pt, rounded corners=5pt, fill=white},\n header/.style={\n text=white,\n font=\\sffamily\\bfseries\\fontsize{10.5}{11.8}\\selectfont,\n align=center\n },\n title/.style={font=\\sffamily\\bfseries\\fontsize{12.0}{13.2}\\selectfont, text=CoInk},\n subtitle/.style={font=\\sffamily\\bfseries\\fontsize{9.0}{10.0}\\selectfont, text=CoInk},\n body/.style={font=\\sffamily\\fontsize{8.5}{9.5}\\selectfont, text=CoInk},\n small/.style={font=\\sffamily\\fontsize{7.7}{8.6}\\selectfont, text=CoInk},\n mono/.style={font=\\ttfamily\\fontsize{8.1}{9.0}\\selectfont, text=CoInk},\n flow/.style={-{Stealth[length=2.8mm,width=2.0mm]}, line width=0.90pt},\n thinflow/.style={-{Stealth[length=2.0mm,width=1.4mm]}, line width=0.70pt}\n]\n\n% Natural canvas, matching the portrait reference image.\n\\path[use as bounding box] (0,0) rectangle (17.0,21.0);\n\n% Helper: each header is clipped by the rounded outer panel so all top corners\n% and outline proportions remain uniform.\n\n% ============================================================================\n% 1. INPUT AND EXTRACTION REQUEST\n% ============================================================================\n\\begin{scope}\n \\clip[rounded corners=8pt] (0.35,17.35) rectangle (16.65,20.65);\n \\fill[CoBlueFill] (0.35,17.35) rectangle (16.65,20.65);\n \\fill[CoBlue] (0.35,19.88) rectangle (16.65,20.65);\n\\end{scope}\n\\draw[outer, draw=CoBlue] (0.35,17.35) rectangle (16.65,20.65);\n\\node[header] at (8.50,20.27) {1. Input and extraction request};\n\n\\node[title] at (8.50,19.18) {Java project + extraction request};\n\\node[body, align=center, text=CoGray] at (8.50,18.40)\n {scope/source set\\\\ package/type/method filters};\n\n% Repository folder icon.\n\\begin{scope}[shift={(2.65,18.80)}]\n \\draw[draw=CoBlue, fill=CoBlue!8, line width=0.95pt, rounded corners=2.8pt]\n (-0.82,0.12)--(-0.66,0.58)--(0.22,0.58)--(0.43,0.38)\n --(0.94,0.38)--(0.94,-0.58)--(-0.82,-0.58)--cycle;\n \\node[text=CoBlue, font=\\sffamily\\bfseries\\fontsize{17}{17}\\selectfont]\n at (0.05,-0.13) {$</>$};\n\\end{scope}\n\\node[subtitle] at (2.72,17.80) {Java repository};\n\n% Focal-method card.\n\\draw[inner, draw=CoBlue, fill=CoBlue!1] (12.05,18.02) rectangle (15.95,19.65);\n\\node[subtitle] at (14.00,19.34) {Focal method (example)};\n\\draw[inner, draw=CoBlue!55, fill=white, line width=0.65pt, rounded corners=4pt]\n (12.34,18.25) rectangle (15.66,19.02);\n\\node[mono, align=center] at (14.00,18.635)\n {public int calculate(\\\\[-0.1ex] int a, int b) \\{ ... \\}};\n\n% Input arrows.\n\\draw[flow, draw=CoBlue] (4.70,17.35)--(4.70,16.78);\n\\draw[flow, draw=CoBlue] (12.30,17.35)--(12.30,16.78);\n\n% ============================================================================\n% 2a. SOURCE MODEL\n% ============================================================================\n\\begin{scope}\n \\clip[rounded corners=8pt] (0.35,11.55) rectangle (8.25,16.55);\n \\fill[CoGreenFill] (0.35,11.55) rectangle (8.25,16.55);\n \\fill[CoGreen] (0.35,15.80) rectangle (8.25,16.55);\n\\end{scope}\n\\draw[outer, draw=CoGreen] (0.35,11.55) rectangle (8.25,16.55);\n\\node[font=\\sffamily\\bfseries\\fontsize{9.15}{10.0}\\selectfont, text=white, align=center] at (4.30,16.17) {2a. CoCoMUT source model (uses \\spoon~\\cite{spoon})};\n\n% CtModel card.\n\\draw[inner, draw=CoGreen!80!black] (0.70,12.00) rectangle (3.68,15.35);\n\\node[subtitle, align=center] at (2.19,14.93) {Typed \\spoon\\\\CtModel};\n\n% Tree icon, centered with comfortable margins.\n\\coordinate (s0) at (2.19,14.12);\n\\coordinate (s1) at (1.57,13.49);\n\\coordinate (s2) at (2.81,13.49);\n\\coordinate (s3) at (1.16,12.80);\n\\coordinate (s4) at (1.98,12.80);\n\\coordinate (s5) at (3.22,12.80);\n\\coordinate (s6) at (1.73,12.24);\n\\coordinate (s7) at (2.23,12.24);\n\\draw[draw=CoGreen!72!black, line width=0.86pt]\n (s0)--(s1) (s0)--(s2) (s1)--(s3) (s1)--(s4)\n (s2)--(s5) (s4)--(s6) (s4)--(s7);\n\\foreach \\p in {s0,s1,s2,s3,s4,s5,s6,s7}\n \\filldraw[fill=CoGreen!9, draw=CoGreen!80!black, line width=0.78pt] (\\p) circle (0.125);\n\n% Source-index card.\n\\draw[inner, draw=CoGreen!80!black] (3.98,12.00) rectangle (7.90,15.35);\n\\node[subtitle] at (5.94,15.00) {CoCoMUT source index};\n\\draw[draw=CoGreen!45, line width=0.62pt] (3.98,14.64)--(7.90,14.64);\n\n% Source-index rows.\n\\begin{scope}[shift={(4.43,14.28)}]\n % link\n \\begin{scope}[rotate=42]\n \\draw[draw=CoGreen, line width=0.82pt, rounded corners=2.5pt]\n (-0.17,-0.07) rectangle (0.07,0.08);\n \\draw[draw=CoGreen, line width=0.82pt, rounded corners=2.5pt]\n (0.02,-0.09) rectangle (0.26,0.06);\n \\end{scope}\n \\node[body, anchor=west] at (0.55,0) {stable method URIs};\n\n % document\n \\draw[draw=CoGreen, fill=white, line width=0.75pt] (-0.12,-0.72) rectangle (0.18,-0.33);\n \\draw[draw=CoGreen, line width=0.5pt]\n (-0.05,-0.43)--(0.10,-0.43) (-0.05,-0.53)--(0.10,-0.53) (-0.05,-0.63)--(0.07,-0.63);\n \\node[body, anchor=west] at (0.55,-0.52) {Javadocs};\n\n % @ annotation\n \\node[text=CoGreen, font=\\sffamily\\bfseries\\fontsize{13}{13}\\selectfont] at (0.03,-1.04) {@};\n \\node[body, anchor=west] at (0.55,-1.04) {annotations};\n\n % hierarchy\n \\draw[draw=CoGreen, line width=0.75pt]\n (0.03,-1.45)--(0.03,-1.63) (-0.20,-1.63)--(0.26,-1.63)\n (-0.20,-1.63)--(-0.20,-1.82) (0.26,-1.63)--(0.26,-1.82);\n \\filldraw[fill=white, draw=CoGreen, line width=0.65pt] (0.03,-1.42) circle (0.045);\n \\filldraw[fill=white, draw=CoGreen, line width=0.65pt] (-0.20,-1.86) circle (0.045);\n \\filldraw[fill=white, draw=CoGreen, line width=0.65pt] (0.26,-1.86) circle (0.045);\n \\node[body, anchor=west] at (0.55,-1.67) {hierarchy};\n\\end{scope}\n\n\\draw[flow, draw=CoGreen] (4.30,11.55)--(4.30,11.02);\n\n% ============================================================================\n% 2b. BYTECODE ANALYSIS\n% ============================================================================\n\\begin{scope}\n \\clip[rounded corners=8pt] (8.75,11.55) rectangle (16.65,16.55);\n \\fill[CoPurpleFill] (8.75,11.55) rectangle (16.65,16.55);\n \\fill[CoPurple] (8.75,15.80) rectangle (16.65,16.55);\n\\end{scope}\n\\draw[outer, draw=CoPurple] (8.75,11.55) rectangle (16.65,16.55);\n\\node[font=\\sffamily\\bfseries\\fontsize{8.95}{9.8}\\selectfont, text=white, align=center] at (12.70,16.17) {2b. CoCoMUT bytecode analysis (uses \\sootup~\\cite{sootup})};\n\n% Project bytecode card.\n\\draw[inner, draw=CoPurple!75!black] (9.12,12.00) rectangle (12.08,15.35);\n\\node[subtitle, align=center] at (10.60,14.88) {Project bytecode\\\\+ dependencies};\n\n\\draw[draw=CoGray, fill=white, line width=0.82pt]\n (9.90,12.67)--(9.90,13.97)--(10.55,13.97)--(10.91,13.61)\n --(10.91,12.67)--cycle;\n\\draw[draw=CoGray, line width=0.62pt] (10.55,13.97)--(10.55,13.61)--(10.91,13.61);\n\\node[mono, align=center] at (10.40,13.18) {.class\\\\1010\\\\0101};\n\n% JavaView card.\n\\draw[inner, draw=CoPurple!75!black] (12.38,12.00) rectangle (16.28,15.35);\n\\node[subtitle] at (14.33,14.92) {JavaView};\n\\node[body] at (14.33,14.52) {CHA/RTA call graph};\n\n\\node[circle, draw=CoPurple, fill=CoPurple, line width=0.82pt, minimum size=0.43cm, inner sep=0pt]\n (mid) at (14.33,13.43) {};\n\\foreach \\name/\\xx/\\yy in {\n c1/13.35/13.96,c2/14.33/14.16,c3/15.31/13.96,\n c4/13.35/12.90,c5/15.31/12.90}{\n \\node[circle, draw=CoPurple, fill=white, line width=0.75pt, minimum size=0.32cm, inner sep=0pt]\n (\\name) at (\\xx,\\yy) {};\n}\n\\foreach \\n in {c1,c2,c3,c4,c5}\n \\draw[thinflow, draw=CoGray, shorten <=3pt, shorten >=3pt] (\\n)--(mid);\n\\node[body] at (14.33,12.34) {caller / callee edges};\n\n\\draw[flow, draw=CoPurple] (11.47,13.45)--(12.27,13.45);\n\\draw[flow, draw=CoPurple] (12.70,11.55)--(12.70,11.02);\n\n% ============================================================================\n% 3. SOURCE-BYTECODE RECONCILIATION\n% ============================================================================\n\\begin{scope}\n \\clip[rounded corners=8pt] (0.35,6.75) rectangle (16.65,10.90);\n \\fill[CoGoldFill] (0.35,6.75) rectangle (16.65,10.90);\n \\fill[CoGold] (0.35,10.17) rectangle (16.65,10.90);\n\\end{scope}\n\\draw[outer, draw=CoGold] (0.35,6.75) rectangle (16.65,10.90);\n\\node[header] at (8.50,10.535) {3. Source--bytecode reconciliation (CoCoMUT)};\n\n% Source method key.\n\\draw[inner, draw=CoGreen!80!black] (1.75,8.77) rectangle (5.18,9.88);\n\\draw[draw=CoGreen, fill=white, line width=0.76pt]\n (2.10,8.98)--(2.10,9.64)--(2.47,9.64)--(2.70,9.41)--(2.70,8.98)--cycle;\n\\draw[draw=CoGreen, line width=0.56pt] (2.47,9.64)--(2.47,9.41)--(2.70,9.41);\n\\node[text=CoGreen, font=\\sffamily\\bfseries\\fontsize{7}{11}\\selectfont] at (2.39,9.25) {$</>$};\n\\node[subtitle, align=left, anchor=west] at (3.05,9.33) {source\\\\ method key};\n\n% Bytecode signature, simple document/binary symbol.\n\\draw[inner, draw=CoPurple!75!black] (11.82,8.77) rectangle (15.25,9.88);\n\\draw[draw=CoPurple, fill=white, line width=0.76pt]\n (12.18,8.98)--(12.18,9.64)--(12.55,9.64)--(12.78,9.41)--(12.78,8.98)--cycle;\n\\draw[draw=CoPurple, line width=0.56pt] (12.55,9.64)--(12.55,9.41)--(12.78,9.41);\n\\node[font=\\ttfamily\\bfseries\\fontsize{4.5}{4.5}\\selectfont, text=CoPurple, align=center]\n at (12.47,9.25) {1010\\\\0101};\n\\node[subtitle, align=left, anchor=west] at (13.15,9.33) {bytecode\\\\ signature};\n\n% Dashed join and central link.\n\\draw[draw=CoInk!72, dash pattern=on 5pt off 3pt, line width=0.78pt]\n (5.18,9.33)--(7.80,9.33);\n\\draw[draw=CoInk!72, dash pattern=on 5pt off 3pt, line width=0.78pt]\n (9.20,9.33)--(11.82,9.33);\n\\draw[draw=CoGold!85!black, fill=white, line width=0.82pt] (8.50,9.33) circle (0.38);\n\\begin{scope}[shift={(8.50,9.33)}, rotate=40]\n \\draw[draw=CoGold!85!black, line width=0.88pt, rounded corners=2.6pt]\n (-0.23,-0.075) rectangle (0.06,0.08);\n \\draw[draw=CoGold!85!black, line width=0.88pt, rounded corners=2.6pt]\n (-0.02,-0.08) rectangle (0.27,0.075);\n\\end{scope}\n\n% Branch to outcomes.\n\\draw[flow, draw=CoGold!90!black] (8.50,8.93)--(8.50,8.55);\n\\draw[draw=CoInk!70, line width=0.72pt] (3.12,8.45)--(13.88,8.45);\n\\draw[draw=CoInk!70, line width=0.72pt] (3.12,8.45)--(3.12,8.20);\n\\draw[draw=CoInk!70, line width=0.72pt] (8.50,8.45)--(8.50,8.20);\n\\draw[draw=CoInk!70, line width=0.72pt] (13.88,8.45)--(13.88,8.20);\n\n% Outcome cards.\n\\draw[inner, draw=CoInk!70] (1.85,7.10) rectangle (5.15,8.20);\n\\draw[draw=CoGreen, fill=CoGreen!7, line width=0.80pt] (2.55,7.65) circle (0.22);\n\\draw[draw=CoGreen, line width=0.90pt] (2.42,7.64)--(2.52,7.54)--(2.70,7.77);\n\\node[body, align=left, anchor=west] at (3.00,7.66)\n {unique match\\\\[-0.10ex]$\\rightarrow$ \\texttt{method\\_uri}};\n\n\\draw[inner, draw=CoInk!70] (6.85,7.10) rectangle (10.15,8.20);\n\\draw[draw=CoGold!90!black, fill=CoGold!8, line width=0.80pt]\n (7.43,7.37)--(7.70,7.88)--(7.97,7.37)--cycle;\n\\node[font=\\sffamily\\bfseries\\fontsize{8.5}{8.5}\\selectfont, text=CoGold!90!black]\n at (7.70,7.57) {!};\n\\node[body, align=left, anchor=west] at (8.12,7.66)\n {multiple\\\\[-0.10ex]$\\rightarrow$ ambiguity};\n\n\\draw[inner, draw=CoInk!70] (11.85,7.10) rectangle (15.15,8.20);\n\\draw[draw=CoRed, fill=CoRed!6, line width=0.80pt] (12.55,7.65) circle (0.22);\n\\draw[draw=CoRed, line width=0.90pt] (12.41,7.51)--(12.69,7.79) (12.41,7.79)--(12.69,7.51);\n\\node[body, align=left, anchor=west] at (13.00,7.66)\n {no match\\\\[-0.10ex]$\\rightarrow$ \\texttt{target\\_uri}};\n\n\\draw[flow, draw=CoOrange] (8.50,6.75)--(8.50,6.18);\n\n% ============================================================================\n% 4. VERSIONED OUTPUTS AND DIAGNOSTICS (COMPRESSED)\n% ============================================================================\n\\begin{scope}\n % 1. Changed bottom coordinate from 1.10 to 1.70 to make the rectangle less tall\n \\clip[rounded corners=8pt] (2.15,1.70) rectangle (14.85,5.95);\n \\fill[CoOrangeFill] (2.15,1.70) rectangle (14.85,5.95);\n \\fill[CoOrange] (2.15,5.25) rectangle (14.85,5.95);\n\\end{scope}\n% Changed bottom coordinate from 1.10 to 1.70\n\\draw[outer, draw=CoOrange] (2.15,1.70) rectangle (14.85,5.95);\n\\node[header] at (8.50,5.60) {4. Versioned outputs and diagnostics};\n\n% Divider: Changed bottom starting Y from 1.60 to 2.10 to match new box floor\n\\draw[draw=CoOrange!35, line width=0.62pt] (8.50,2.10)--(8.50,4.75);\n\n% Versioned JSONL stack: Shifted base Y up from 2.00 to 2.30\n\\foreach \\dx/\\dy in {0.30/0.22,0.15/0.11,0/0} {\n \\draw[draw=CoInk!65, fill=white, line width=0.76pt, rounded corners=2pt]\n (3.35+\\dx,2.30+\\dy) rectangle (4.55+\\dx,4.12+\\dy);\n}\n\\node[font=\\ttfamily\\fontsize{11}{11}\\selectfont, text=CoInk] at (3.95,3.18) {\\{...\\}}; % Y changed from 2.88 to 3.18\n\\node[subtitle, anchor=west] at (5.05,3.75) {versioned JSONL}; % Y changed from 3.55 to 3.75\n\\node[body, align=left, anchor=west] at (5.05,2.95) % Y changed from 2.65 to 2.95\n {$\\bullet$ one row per\\\\[-0.08ex]\\hspace{0.22cm}focal method};\n\n% Extraction-report clipboard: Shifted base Y up from 2.00 to 2.30\n\\draw[draw=CoInk!65, fill=white, line width=0.76pt, rounded corners=2pt]\n (9.30,2.30) rectangle (10.55,4.12);\n\\draw[draw=CoInk!65, fill=white, line width=0.62pt, rounded corners=1.2pt]\n (9.69,4.02) rectangle (10.16,4.32);\n\n% Spacing/Collision Fix: Adjusted inner horizontal lines\n\\draw[draw=CoInk!45, line width=0.50pt] (9.50,3.82)--(10.35,3.82) (9.50,3.62)--(10.15,3.62);\n\n% Spacing/Collision Fix: Scaled and shifted bar heights safely away from lines\n\\draw[draw=CoInk!60, fill=CoInk!16, line width=0.50pt] (9.53,2.50) rectangle (9.73,2.80);\n\\draw[draw=CoInk!60, fill=CoInk!16, line width=0.50pt] (9.83,2.50) rectangle (10.03,3.05);\n\\draw[draw=CoInk!60, fill=CoInk!16, line width=0.50pt] (10.13,2.50) rectangle (10.33,3.35);\n\n% Text labels: Shifted Y positions up by 0.20 to align with the new icon centers\n\\node[subtitle, anchor=west] at (11.10,3.75) {extraction report}; % Y changed from 3.55 to 3.75\n\\node[body, align=left, anchor=west] at (11.10,2.85) % Y changed from 2.65 to 2.85\n {$\\bullet$ failure artifacts\\\\[-0.08ex]$\\bullet$ summary statistics};\n\\end{tikzpicture}%\n}\n\\caption{\\tool{} execution on a Java system.}\n\\Description{Four-stage CoCoMUT workflow. A Java project and extraction request feed a \\spoon-based source model and a \\sootup bytecode analysis. CoCoMUT reconciles a source method key with a bytecode signature, distinguishes unique, ambiguous, and unmatched targets, and emits versioned JSONL records together with extraction diagnostics.}\n\\label{fig:pipeline}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.bib\n================================================\n@article{demillo1978,\n author = {DeMillo, R. A. and Lipton, R. J. and Sayward, F. G.},\n title = {Hints on Test Data Selection: Help for the Practicing Programmer},\n journal = {Computer},\n volume = {11},\n number = {4},\n pages = {34--41},\n year = {1978}\n}\n\n@misc{pitest,\n author = {{PIT Project}},\n title = {Real World Mutation Testing},\n year = {2026},\n url = {https://pitest.org/},\n lastaccessed = {April 16, 2026}\n}\n\n@misc{pitbasic,\n author = {{PIT Basic Concepts Documentation}},\n title = {Basic Concepts},\n year = {2026},\n url = {https://pitest.org/quickstart/basic_concepts/},\n lastaccessed = {April 16, 2026}\n}\n\n@misc{pitmutators,\n author = {{PIT Mutation Operators Documentation}},\n title = {Mutation Operators},\n year = {2026},\n url = {https://pitest.org/quickstart/mutators/},\n lastaccessed = {April 16, 2026}\n}\n\n\n@software{pitmus,\nauthor = {Hossain, Soneya Binta and Tasnim, Tasfia},\nlicense = {Apache-2.0},\nmonth = apr,\ntitle = {{PITMuS: PIT Mutations In the Source Code}},\nurl = {https://github.com/assert-lab/PITMuS},\nversion = {1.0.0},\nyear = {2026}\n}\n\n\n@misc{pitmusdemo,\n author = {Tasfia Tasnim, Soneya Binta Hossain},\n title = {{PITMuS}: {PIT} {Mutations} in the {Source} {Code}},\n year = {2026},\n version = {1.0.0},\n url = {https://github.com/assert-lab/PITMuS}\n}\n\n\n\n@misc{javalang,\n author = {Thunes, C.},\n title = {javalang},\n howpublished = {PyPI project page, \\url{https://pypi.org/project/javalang/}},\n note = {Accessed April 16, 2026}\n}\n\n@misc{commonslang,\n author = {{Apache Software Foundation}},\n title = {Apache Commons Lang},\n howpublished = {GitHub repository, \\url{https://github.com/apache/commons-lang}},\n note = {Accessed April 16, 2026}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{coles2016pit,\n author = {Henry Coles and Thomas Laurent and Christopher Henard and Mike Papadakis and Anthony Ventresque},\n title = {{PIT}: a practical mutation testing tool for Java (demo)},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis},\n pages = {449--452},\n year = {2016},\n publisher = {ACM},\n doi = {10.1145/2931037.2948707}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{laurent2017pitpractice,\n author = {Thomas Laurent and Mike Papadakis and Marinos Kintis and Christopher Henard and Yves Le Traon and Anthony Ventresque},\n title = {Assessing and Improving the Mutation Testing Practice of {PIT}},\n booktitle = {2017 {IEEE} International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation ({ICST})},\n pages = {430--435},\n year = {2017},\n doi = {10.1109/ICST.2017.47}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{petrovic2021practices,\n author = {Goran Petrovi{\\'c} and Marko Ivankovi{\\'c} and Gordon Fraser and Ren{\\'e} Just},\n title = {Does mutation testing improve testing practices?},\n booktitle = {43rd {IEEE/ACM} International Conference on Software Engineering ({ICSE})},\n pages = {910--921},\n year = {2021},\n publisher = {IEEE},\n doi = {10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00087}\n}\n\n@article{petrovic2022google,\n author = {Goran Petrovi{\\'c} and Marko Ivankovi{\\'c} and Gordon Fraser and Ren{\\'e} Just},\n title = {Practical Mutation Testing at Scale: A view from Google},\n journal = {IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering},\n volume = {48},\n number = {10},\n pages = {3900--3912},\n year = {2022},\n doi = {10.1109/TSE.2021.3107634}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{hossain2023gaps,\n author = {Soneya Binta Hossain and Matthew B. Dwyer and Sebastian G. Elbaum and Anh Nguyen-Tuong},\n title = {Measuring and Mitigating Gaps in Structural Testing},\n booktitle = {45th {IEEE/ACM} International Conference on Software Engineering ({ICSE})},\n pages = {1712--1723},\n year = {2023},\n publisher = {IEEE},\n doi = {10.1109/ICSE48619.2023.00147}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{hossain2023neural,\n author = {Soneya Binta Hossain and Antonio Filieri and Matthew B. Dwyer and Sebastian G. Elbaum and Willem Visser},\n title = {Neural-Based Test Oracle Generation: A Large-Scale Evaluation and Lessons Learned},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the 31st {ACM} Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering ({ESEC/FSE})},\n pages = {120--132},\n year = {2023},\n publisher = {ACM},\n doi = {10.1145/3611643.3616265}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{hossain2025togll,\n author = {Soneya Binta Hossain and Matthew B. Dwyer},\n title = {{TOGLL}: Correct and Strong Test Oracle Generation with {LLMs}},\n booktitle = {47th {IEEE/ACM} International Conference on Software Engineering ({ICSE})},\n pages = {1475--1487},\n year = {2025},\n publisher = {IEEE},\n doi = {10.1109/ICSE55347.2025.00098}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{livecodebench,\n author = {Naman Jain and King Han and Alex Gu and Wen-Ding Li and Fanjia Yan and Tianjun Zhang and Sida Wang and Armando Solar-Lezama and Koushik Sen and Ion Stoica},\n title = {{LiveCodeBench}: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code},\n booktitle = {The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, {ICLR} 2025, Singapore, April 24-28, 2025},\n publisher = {OpenReview.net},\n year = {2025},\n url = {https://openreview.net/forum?id=chfJJYC3iL}\n}\n\n@article{benchmarkleakage,\n title = {Benchmarking Benchmark Leakage in Large Language Models},\n author = {Ruijie Xu and Zengzhi Wang and Run-Ze Fan and Pengfei Liu},\n journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.18824},\n year = {2024},\n url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18824}\n}\n\n@article{swebenchlive,\n title = {{SWE-bench} Goes Live!},\n author = {Linghao Zhang and Shilin He and Chaoyun Zhang and Yu Kang and Bowen Li and Chengxing Xie and Junhao Wang and Maoquan Wang and Yufan Huang and Shengyu Fu and Elsie Nallipogu and Qingwei Lin and Yingnong Dang and Saravan Rajmohan and Dongmei Zhang},\n journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23419},\n year = {2025},\n url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23419}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{major,\n author = {Ren{\\'e} Just},\n title = {The Major Mutation Framework: Efficient and Scalable Mutation Analysis for {Java}},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2014 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA)},\n year = {2014},\n pages = {433--436},\n publisher = {ACM},\n doi = {10.1145/2610384.2628053}\n}\n\n@inbook{mutation_survey,\nauthor = {Papadakis, Mike and Kintis, Marinos and Zhang, Jie and Jia, Yue and Le Traon, Yves and Harman, Mark},\nyear = {2018},\nmonth = {01},\npages = {},\ntitle = {Mutation Testing Advances: An Analysis and Survey},\nisbn = {9780128151211},\njournal = {Advances in Computers},\ndoi = {10.1016/bs.adcom.2018.03.015}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{humaneval,\n author = {Mark Chen and Jerry Tworek and Heewoo Jun and others},\n title = {Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code},\n booktitle = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374},\n year = {2021},\n url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03374}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{defects4j,\n author = {Ren{\\'e} Just and Darioush Jalali and Michael D. Ernst},\n title = {{Defects4J}: A Database of Existing Faults to Enable Controlled Testing Studies for {Java} Programs},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2014 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA)},\n year = {2014},\n pages = {437--440},\n publisher = {ACM},\n doi = {10.1145/2610384.2628055}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{manysstubs4j,\n author = {Rafael-Michael Karampatsis and Charles Sutton},\n title = {How Often Do Single-Statement Bugs Occur? The {ManySStuBs4J} Dataset},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)},\n year = {2020},\n pages = {573--577},\n publisher = {ACM},\n doi = {10.1145/3379597.3387491}\n}\n\n@misc{cocomut,\n author = {{ASSERT Lab}},\n title = {{CoCoMUT}: Context Constructor},\n year = {2026},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://github.com/assert-lab/CoCoMUT}},\n year = {2026},\n version = {0.1.0},\n license = {Apache-2.0},\n note = {Research artifact}\n}\n\n\n\n@misc{tool_demo,\n author = {{ASSERT Lab}},\n title = {{CoCoMUT} Demonstration Video},\n year = {2026},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://youtu.be/RCUzkCQjG30}},\n note = {Video demonstration}\n}\n\n@software{jackson_repo,\n author = {{FasterXML}},\n title = {Jackson},\n year = {2026},\n url = {https://github.com/fasterxml/jackson},\n note = {GitHub repository}\n}\n\n@article{spoon,\nauthor = {Pawlak, Renaud and Monperrus, Martin and Petitprez, Nicolas and Noguera, Carlos and Seinturier, Lionel},\ntitle = {SPOON: A library for implementing analyses and transformations of Java source code},\nyear = {2016},\nissue_date = {September 2016},\npublisher = {John Wiley \\& Sons, Inc.},\naddress = {USA},\nvolume = {46},\nnumber = {9},\nissn = {0038-0644},\nurl = {https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2346},\ndoi = {10.1002/spe.2346},\njournal = {Softw. Pract. Exper.},\nmonth = sep,\npages = {1155–1179},\nnumpages = {25},\nkeywords = {source code transformation, source code analysis, metaprogramming}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{sootup,\nauthor = {Karakaya, Kadiray and Schott, Stefan and Klauke, Jonas and Bodden, Eric and Schmidt, Markus and Luo, Linghui and He, Dongjie},\ntitle = {SootUp: A Redesign of the Soot Static Analysis Framework},\nyear = {2024},\nisbn = {978-3-031-57245-6},\npublisher = {Springer-Verlag},\naddress = {Berlin, Heidelberg},\nurl = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57246-3_13},\ndoi = {10.1007/978-3-031-57246-3_13},\nbooktitle = {Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems: 30th International Conference, TACAS 2024, Held as Part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2024, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg, April 6–11, 2024, Proceedings, Part I},\npages = {229–247},\nnumpages = {19},\nkeywords = {Static program analysis, Soot, SootUp},\nlocation = {Luxembourg City, Luxembourg}\n}\n\n\n\n@misc{jsonlines,\n title = {{JSON Lines}},\n author = {{JSON Lines Community}},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://jsonlines.org/}},\n note = {Accessed: 2026-06-26}\n}\n\n@misc{javadoc17,\n author = {{Oracle}},\n title = {{Documentation Comment Specification for the Standard Doclet}},\n year = {2021},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/specs/javadoc/doc-comment-spec.html}},\n note = {Accessed June 22, 2026}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{haque2020filecontext,\n author = {Haque, Sakib and LeClair, Alexander and Wu, Lingfei\n and McMillan, Collin},\n title = {Improved Automatic Summarization of Subroutines via\n Attention to File Context},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on\n Mining Software Repositories},\n series = {MSR '20},\n year = {2020},\n pages = {300--310},\n publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\n doi = {10.1145/3379597.3387449}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{dinella2022toga,\n author = {Dinella, Elizabeth and Ryan, Gabriel and Mytkowicz, Todd\n and Lahiri, Shuvendu K.},\n title = {{TOGA}: A Neural Method for Test Oracle Generation},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on\n Software Engineering},\n series = {ICSE '22},\n year = {2022},\n pages = {2130--2141},\n publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\n doi = {10.1145/3510003.3510141}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{tufano2021review,\n author = {Tufano, Rosalia and Pascarella, Luca and Tufano, Michele\n and Poshyvanyk, Denys and Bavota, Gabriele},\n title = {Towards Automating Code Review Activities},\n booktitle = {2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on\n Software Engineering},\n series = {ICSE '21},\n year = {2021},\n pages = {163--174},\n publisher = {IEEE},\n doi = {10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00027}\n}\n\n@article{rafi2024depgraph,\n author = {Rafi, Md Nakhla and Kim, Dong Jae and Chen, An Ran\n and Chen, Tse-Hsun and Wang, Shaowei},\n title = {Towards Better Graph Neural Network-Based Fault\n Localization through Enhanced Code Representation},\n journal = {Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering},\n volume = {1},\n number = {FSE},\n articleno = {86},\n pages = {1937--1959},\n year = {2024},\n publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\n doi = {10.1145/3660793}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{li2020dlfix,\n author = {Li, Yi and Wang, Shaohua and Nguyen, Tien N.},\n title = {{DLFix}: Context-Based Code Transformation Learning\n for Automated Program Repair},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International\n Conference on Software Engineering},\n series = {ICSE '20},\n year = {2020},\n pages = {602--614},\n publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\n doi = {10.1145/3377811.3380345}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{sundaresan2000virtual,\n author = {Sundaresan, Vijay and Hendren, Laurie J.\n and Razafimahefa, Chrislain and Vall{\\'e}e-Rai, Raja\n and Lam, Patrick and Gagnon, Etienne and Godin, Charles},\n title = {Practical Virtual Method Call Resolution for {Java}},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on\n Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages,\n and Applications},\n series = {OOPSLA '00},\n year = {2000},\n pages = {264--280},\n publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{tufano2022methods2test,\n author = {Tufano, Michele and Deng, Shao Kun and Sundaresan, Neel\n and Svyatkovskiy, Alexey},\n title = {{Methods2Test}: A Dataset of Focal Methods Mapped to\n Test Cases},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on\n Mining Software Repositories},\n series = {MSR '22},\n year = {2022},\n pages = {299--303},\n publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\n doi = {10.1145/3524842.3528009}\n}\n\n@article{liu2022reproducibility,\n author = {Liu, Chao and Gao, Cuiyun and Xia, Xin and Lo, David\n and Grundy, John C. and Yang, Xiaohu},\n title = {On the Reproducibility and Replicability of Deep\n Learning in Software Engineering},\n journal = {ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology},\n volume = {31},\n number = {1},\n articleno = {15},\n numpages = {46},\n year = {2022},\n publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\n doi = {10.1145/3477535}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhu2023defectdatasets,\n author = {Zhu, Hao-Nan and Rubio-Gonz{\\'a}lez, Cindy},\n title = {On the Reproducibility of Software Defect Datasets},\n booktitle = {2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on\n Software Engineering},\n series = {ICSE '23},\n year = {2023},\n pages = {2324--2335},\n publisher = {IEEE},\n doi = {10.1109/ICSE48619.2023.00195}\n}\n\n@article{hossain2025doc2oracll,\n title={Doc2oracll: Investigating the impact of documentation on llm-based test oracle generation},\n author={Hossain, Soneya Binta and Taylor, Raygan and Dwyer, Matthew},\n journal={Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering},\n volume={2},\n number={FSE},\n pages={1870--1891},\n year={2025},\n publisher={ACM New York, NY, USA}\n}\n\n@article{hossain2024deep,\n title={A deep dive into large language models for automated bug localization and repair},\n author={Hossain, Soneya Binta and Jiang, Nan and Zhou, Qiang and Li, Xiaopeng and Chiang, Wen-Hao and Lyu, Yingjun and Nguyen, Hoan and Tripp, Omer},\n journal={Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering},\n volume={1},\n number={FSE},\n pages={1471--1493},\n year={2024},\n publisher={ACM New York, NY, USA}\n}\n\n@article{doc2OracLL,\nauthor = {Hossain, Soneya Binta and Taylor, Raygan and Dwyer, Matthew},\ntitle = {Doc2OracLL: Investigating the Impact of Documentation on LLM-Based Test Oracle Generation},\nyear = {2025},\nissue_date = {July 2025},\npublisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\naddress = {New York, NY, USA},\nvolume = {2},\nnumber = {FSE},\nurl = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3729354},\ndoi = {10.1145/3729354},\njournal = {Proc. ACM Softw. Eng.},\nmonth = jun,\narticleno = {FSE084},\nnumpages = {22},\nkeywords = {documentation, large language model, software testing, test oracles}\n}\n\n\n@article{schaefer2024empirical,\n author = {Sch{\\\"a}fer, Max and Nadi, Sarah and Eghbali, Aryaz and Tip, Frank},\n title = {An Empirical Evaluation of Using Large Language Models for Automated Unit Test Generation},\n journal = {IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering},\n volume = {50},\n number = {1},\n pages = {85--105},\n year = {2024},\n publisher = {IEEE},\n doi = {10.1109/TSE.2023.3334955}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{chen2024chatunitest,\n author = {Chen, Yinghao and Hu, Zehao and Zhi, Chen and Han, Junxiao and Deng, Shuiguang and Yin, Jianwei},\n title = {{ChatUniTest}: A Framework for {LLM}-Based Test Generation},\n booktitle = {Companion Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on the Foundations of Software Engineering},\n pages = {572--576},\n year = {2024},\n publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\n doi = {10.1145/3663529.3663801}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{wang2024hits,\n author = {Wang, Zejun and Liu, Kaibo and Li, Ge and Jin, Zhi},\n title = {{HITS}: High-Coverage {LLM}-Based Unit Test Generation via Method Slicing},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the 39th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering},\n pages = {1258--1268},\n year = {2024},\n publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\n doi = {10.1145/3691620.3695501}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2023repocoder,\n author = {Zhang, Fengji and Chen, Bei and Zhang, Yue and Keung, Jacky and Liu, Jin and Zan, Daoguang and Mao, Yi and Lou, Jian-Guang and Chen, Weizhu},\n title = {{RepoCoder}: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and Generation},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing},\n pages = {2471--2484},\n year = {2023},\n address = {Singapore},\n publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},\n doi = {10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.151},\n url = {https://aclanthology.org/2023.emnlp-main.151/}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2024autocoderover,\n author = {Zhang, Yuntong and Ruan, Haifeng and Fan, Zhiyu and Roychoudhury, Abhik},\n title = {{AutoCodeRover}: Autonomous Program Improvement},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the 33rd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis},\n pages = {1592--1604},\n year = {2024},\n publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\n doi = {10.1145/3650212.3680384}\n}\n\n@software{cocomut_zenodo_2026,\n author = {Botta, Alessandro and \n Garisa, Shiven and \n Akurathi, Jaya Vardhini and \n Sabit, Ahsanul Ameen and \n Woodlief, Trey and \n Hossain, Soneya Binta},\n title = {{CoCoMUT: A Tool for Code-Context Mining and \n Automated Dataset Generation}},\n month = jun,\n year = 2026,\n publisher = {Zenodo},\n version = {v0.1.0}, \n doi = {10.5281/zenodo.20962959},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20962959}\n}\n\n@article{xia2025agentless,\n author = {Xia, Chunqiu Steven and Deng, Yinlin and Dunn, Soren and Zhang, Lingming},\n title = {Demystifying {LLM}-Based Software Engineering Agents},\n journal = {Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering},\n volume = {2},\n number = {FSE},\n articleno = {FSE037},\n pages = {801--824},\n year = {2025},\n publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\n doi = {10.1145/3715754}\n}\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091172,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31972"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31972"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Changming Huang"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Changming Huang, Yan Wang, Pengcheng Liu, Qidong Fu, Liangwei Dong"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Dissipative surface solitons in two-dimensional truncated lattices with linear gain and loss"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"19 pages, 10 figures, to appear in Chaos,Solitons & Fractals"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"nlin.PS physics.optics"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Dissipative solitons constitute a robust class of self-localized nonlinear states sustained by the dynamic balance between nonlinearity and gain-loss, possessing an intrinsic stability that stems from their fundamental attractor nature. When combined with lattice truncation, this balance gives rise to dissipative surface solitons (DSSs), whose existence and stability are jointly dictated by boundary-induced confinement and non-Hermitian dynamics. In two-dimensional truncated lattices with linear gain and loss, surface localization emerges within gap regimes, where families of DSSs bifurcate from linear surface localized gain modes as the nonlinearity increases. Increasing the number of waveguide rows at the interface enriches the diversity of supported surface modes in both linear and nonlinear regimes. Although multiple DSS families with distinct phase configurations may coexist within the same gap, their dynamical stability is strongly phase selective. These insights establish linear gain-loss engineering as a powerful mechanism for controlling nonlinear surface localization and provide practical guidelines for realizing robust nonlinear surface states in gain-loss-tailored photonic platforms."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:12:50 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:12:50 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Huang","Changming",""],["Wang","Yan",""],["Liu","Pengcheng",""],["Fu","Qidong",""],["Dong","Liangwei",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Huang\",\n \"Changming\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Wang\",\n \"Yan\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Liu\",\n \"Pengcheng\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Fu\",\n \"Qidong\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Dong\",\n \"Liangwei\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: Surface_CSF_SI_v2.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[10pt,superscriptaddress,onecolumn]{revtex4-2}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{bm}\n\\usepackage{changes}\n\\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}\n\n\n\\usepackage{soul}\n%\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\n\n% \\usepackage{titlesec}\n\n% \\titleformat{\\section}\n% {\\normalfont\\Large\\bfseries}\n% {\\thesection}\n% {1em}\n% {}\n\n\\makeatletter\n\\renewcommand{\\section}{\\@startsection{section}{1}{0mm}\n\t{-\\baselineskip}{0.25\\baselineskip}{\\normalfont\\bfseries\\raggedright}} %{\\bf\\leftline} \\raggedright \\leftline\n\\makeatother\n\\renewcommand{\\subsection}{\\@startsection{subsection}{1}{0mm}\n\t{-\\baselineskip}{0.25\\baselineskip}{\\normalfont\\bfseries\\raggedright}} %{\\bf\\leftline} \\leftline\n\\renewcommand{\\theequation}{S\\arabic{equation}}\n\\renewcommand{\\thesection}{S\\arabic{section}}\n\\renewcommand{\\thetable}{S\\arabic{table}}\n\\renewcommand{\\thefigure}{S\\arabic{figure}}\n\\begin{document}\n\\title{Supporting Information for Dissipative surface solitons in two-dimensional truncated lattices with linear gain and loss}\n\n\\author{Changming Huang}\n\\email{hcm123\\_2004@126.com}\n\\affiliation{Department of Physics, Changzhi University, Changzhi, Shanxi 046011, China}\n\\author{Yan Wang}\n\\affiliation{Department of Physics, Changzhi University, Changzhi, Shanxi 046011, China}\n\\author{Pengcheng Liu}\n\\affiliation{Department of Physics, Changzhi University, Changzhi, Shanxi 046011, China}\n\n\\author{Qidong Fu}\n\\email{jellyfqd@sjtu.edu.cn}\n\\affiliation{School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China}\t\n\\author{Liangwei Dong}\n\\email{dlw\\_0@163.com}\n\\affiliation{Department of Physics, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou, 310023, China}\n\n\n\\date{\\today}\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\\noindent{\\normalfont\\bfseries S1. \\textbf{Derivation of the linear stability eigenvalue problem.}}\n\\par\\vspace{0.25\\baselineskip}\nWe consider the perturbed solution in the form\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Psi(x,y,z)=\n\\left\\{\n\\phi_r(x,y)+i\\phi_i(x,y)\n+\n\\left[g_1(x,y)+ig_2(x,y)\\right]e^{\\tau z}\n\\right\\}e^{i\\beta z},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\phi_r$ and $\\phi_i$ are the real and imaginary parts of the stationary solution, respectively. The functions $g_1$ and $g_2$ denote the real and imaginary parts of the perturbation amplitude, and $\\tau$ is the corresponding perturbation growth rate.\n\nFor convenience, we define the stationary field as\n\\begin{equation}\n\\phi(x,y)=\\phi_r(x,y)+i\\phi_i(x,y),\n\\end{equation}\nand introduce the perturbation amplitude\n\\begin{equation}\n\\tilde{\\eta}(x,y)=g_1(x,y)+ig_2(x,y).\n\\end{equation}\nThe full perturbation is then written as\n\\begin{equation}\n\\eta(x,y,z)=\\tilde{\\eta}(x,y)e^{\\tau z}.\n\\end{equation}\nTherefore, the perturbed field can be expressed compactly as\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Psi(x,y,z)=\\left[\\phi(x,y)+\\eta(x,y,z)\\right]e^{i\\beta z}\n=\n\\left[\\phi(x,y)+\\tilde{\\eta}(x,y)e^{\\tau z}\\right]e^{i\\beta z}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nThe governing equation is\n\\begin{equation}\ni\\frac{\\partial \\Psi}{\\partial z}\n=\n-\\frac{1}{2}\n\\left(\n\\frac{\\partial^2\\Psi}{\\partial x^2}\n+\n\\frac{\\partial^2\\Psi}{\\partial y^2}\n\\right)\n-\\left(V_r-iV_i\\right)\\Psi\n-\\sigma |\\Psi|^2\\Psi .\n\\end{equation}\nIntroducing the two-dimensional Laplacian operator\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Delta=\n\\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial x^2}\n+\n\\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial y^2},\n\\end{equation}\nthe governing equation can be written as\n\\begin{equation}\ni\\frac{\\partial \\Psi}{\\partial z}\n=\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\\Psi\n-\\left(V_r-iV_i\\right)\\Psi\n-\\sigma |\\Psi|^2\\Psi .\n\\end{equation}\n\nSubstituting\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Psi=\\left(\\phi+\\eta\\right)e^{i\\beta z}\n\\end{equation}\ninto the governing equation gives\n\\begin{equation}\ni\n\\left[\n\\frac{\\partial \\eta}{\\partial z}\n+i\\beta(\\phi+\\eta)\n\\right]\n=\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta(\\phi+\\eta)\n-\\left(V_r-iV_i\\right)(\\phi+\\eta)\n-\\sigma|\\phi+\\eta|^2(\\phi+\\eta).\n\\end{equation}\nSince\n\\begin{equation}\n\\eta(x,y,z)=\\tilde{\\eta}(x,y)e^{\\tau z}, \\nonumber\n\\end{equation}\nwe have\n\\begin{equation}\n\\frac{\\partial \\eta}{\\partial z}\n=\n\\tau \\tilde{\\eta}e^{\\tau z}\n=\n\\tau\\eta .\n\\end{equation}\nThus,\n\\begin{equation}\ni\\tau\\eta-\\beta(\\phi+\\eta)\n=\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta(\\phi+\\eta)\n-\\left(V_r-iV_i\\right)(\\phi+\\eta)\n-\\sigma|\\phi+\\eta|^2(\\phi+\\eta).\n\\end{equation}\n\nThe stationary solution $\\phi$ satisfies\n\\begin{equation}\n-\\beta\\phi\n=\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\\phi\n-\\left(V_r-iV_i\\right)\\phi\n-\\sigma|\\phi|^2\\phi .\n\\end{equation}\nSubtracting the stationary equation from the perturbed equation yields\n\\begin{equation}\ni\\tau\\eta-\\beta\\eta\n=\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\\eta\n-\\left(V_r-iV_i\\right)\\eta\n-\\sigma\\left[\n|\\phi+\\eta|^2(\\phi+\\eta)-|\\phi|^2\\phi\n\\right].\n\\end{equation}\n\nNext, we linearize the nonlinear term with respect to the perturbation $\\eta$. To first order in $\\eta$, one has\n\\begin{equation}\n|\\phi+\\eta|^2\n=\n(\\phi+\\eta)(\\phi^*+\\eta^*)\n=\n|\\phi|^2+\\phi^*\\eta+\\phi\\eta^*\n+O(|\\eta|^2).\n\\end{equation}\nTherefore,\n\\begin{align}\n|\\phi+\\eta|^2(\\phi+\\eta)\n&=\n\\left(\n|\\phi|^2+\\phi^*\\eta+\\phi\\eta^*\n\\right)(\\phi+\\eta)\n+O(|\\eta|^2) \\notag\\\\\n&=\n|\\phi|^2\\phi\n+\n|\\phi|^2\\eta\n+\n\\phi^*\\eta\\phi\n+\n\\phi\\eta^*\\phi\n+\nO(|\\eta|^2) \\notag\\\\\n&=\n|\\phi|^2\\phi\n+\n2|\\phi|^2\\eta\n+\n\\phi^2\\eta^*\n+\nO(|\\eta|^2).\n\\end{align}\nThus, after retaining only the linear terms, we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\n|\\phi+\\eta|^2(\\phi+\\eta)-|\\phi|^2\\phi\n=\n2|\\phi|^2\\eta+\\phi^2\\eta^*.\n\\end{equation}\nThe linearized perturbation equation is therefore\n\\begin{equation}\ni\\tau\\eta-\\beta\\eta\n=\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\\eta\n-\\left(V_r-iV_i\\right)\\eta\n-\\sigma\n\\left(\n2|\\phi|^2\\eta+\\phi^2\\eta^*\n\\right).\n\\end{equation}\nEquivalently,\n\\begin{equation}\ni\\tau\\eta\n=\n\\left[\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n-V_r+iV_i+\\beta\n-2\\sigma|\\phi|^2\n\\right]\\eta\n-\\sigma\\phi^2\\eta^* .\n\\end{equation}\n\nSince\n\\begin{equation}\n\\eta=\\tilde{\\eta}e^{\\tau z},\n\\qquad\n\\eta^*=\\tilde{\\eta}^*e^{\\tau z},\n\\end{equation}\nand the linearized equation is homogeneous in the perturbation, every term contains the common factor $e^{\\tau z}$. Dividing out this factor gives the equation for the perturbation amplitude:\n\\begin{equation}\ni\\tau\\tilde{\\eta}\n=\n\\left[\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n-V_r+iV_i+\\beta\n-2\\sigma|\\phi|^2\n\\right]\\tilde{\\eta}\n-\\sigma\\phi^2\\tilde{\\eta}^* .\n\\end{equation}\n\nWe now decompose this equation into its real and imaginary parts. By definition,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\phi=\\phi_r+i\\phi_i,\n\\qquad\n\\tilde{\\eta}=g_1+ig_2.\n\\end{equation}\nThus,\n\\begin{equation}\n|\\phi|^2=\\phi_r^2+\\phi_i^2,\n\\end{equation}\nand\n\\begin{equation}\n\\phi^2\n=\n(\\phi_r+i\\phi_i)^2\n=\n\\phi_r^2-\\phi_i^2+2i\\phi_r\\phi_i .\n\\end{equation}\nMoreover,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\tilde{\\eta}^*=g_1-ig_2.\n\\end{equation}\nTherefore,\n\\begin{align}\n\\phi^2\\tilde{\\eta}^*\n&=\n\\left(\n\\phi_r^2-\\phi_i^2+2i\\phi_r\\phi_i\n\\right)\n\\left(\ng_1-ig_2\n\\right)=\n\\left[\n(\\phi_r^2-\\phi_i^2)g_1\n+\n2\\phi_r\\phi_i g_2\n\\right]\n+i\n\\left[\n2\\phi_r\\phi_i g_1\n-\n(\\phi_r^2-\\phi_i^2)g_2\n\\right].\n\\end{align}\n\nThe left-hand side of the perturbation-amplitude equation becomes\n\\begin{equation}\ni\\tau\\tilde{\\eta}\n=\ni\\tau(g_1+ig_2)\n=\n-\\tau g_2+i\\tau g_1 .\n\\end{equation}\nHence, its real and imaginary parts are\n\\begin{equation}\n\\operatorname{Re}(i\\tau\\tilde{\\eta})=-\\tau g_2,\n\\qquad\n\\operatorname{Im}(i\\tau\\tilde{\\eta})=\\tau g_1.\n\\end{equation}\n\nThe first term on the right-hand side is\n\\begin{equation}\n\\left[\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n-V_r+\\beta\n-2\\sigma(\\phi_r^2+\\phi_i^2)\n+iV_i\n\\right](g_1+ig_2).\n\\end{equation}\nIts real part is\n\\begin{equation}\n\\left[\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n-V_r+\\beta\n-2\\sigma(\\phi_r^2+\\phi_i^2)\n\\right]g_1\n-\nV_i g_2,\n\\end{equation}\nand its imaginary part is\n\\begin{equation}\n\\left[\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n-V_r+\\beta\n-2\\sigma(\\phi_r^2+\\phi_i^2)\n\\right]g_2\n+\nV_i g_1.\n\\end{equation}\n\nThe second term on the right-hand side is\n\\begin{equation}\n-\\sigma\\phi^2\\tilde{\\eta}^*.\n\\end{equation}\nAccording to the expansion above, its real part is\n\\begin{equation}\n-\\sigma\n\\left[\n(\\phi_r^2-\\phi_i^2)g_1\n+\n2\\phi_r\\phi_i g_2\n\\right],\n\\end{equation}\nand its imaginary part is\n\\begin{equation}\n-\\sigma\n\\left[\n2\\phi_r\\phi_i g_1\n-\n(\\phi_r^2-\\phi_i^2)g_2\n\\right].\n\\end{equation}\n\nCombining the real parts gives\n\\begin{align}\n-\\tau g_2\n&=\n\\left[\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n-V_r+\\beta\n-2\\sigma(\\phi_r^2+\\phi_i^2)\n\\right]g_1\n-\nV_i g_2 \n-\\sigma\n\\left[\n(\\phi_r^2-\\phi_i^2)g_1\n+\n2\\phi_r\\phi_i g_2\n\\right].\n\\end{align}\nAfter collecting the coefficients of $g_1$ and $g_2$, we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\n-\\tau g_2\n=\n\\left[\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n-V_r+\\beta\n-\\sigma(3\\phi_r^2+\\phi_i^2)\n\\right]g_1\n-\n\\left(\nV_i+2\\sigma\\phi_r\\phi_i\n\\right)g_2 .\n\\end{equation}\nMultiplying both sides by $-1$ yields\n\\begin{equation}\n\\tau g_2\n=\n\\left[\n\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n+V_r-\\beta\n+\\sigma(3\\phi_r^2+\\phi_i^2)\n\\right]g_1\n+\n\\left(\nV_i+2\\sigma\\phi_r\\phi_i\n\\right)g_2 .\n\\end{equation}\n\nSimilarly, combining the imaginary parts gives\n\\begin{align}\n\\tau g_1\n&=\n\\left[\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n-V_r+\\beta\n-2\\sigma(\\phi_r^2+\\phi_i^2)\n\\right]g_2\n+\nV_i g_1\n-\\sigma\n\\left[\n2\\phi_r\\phi_i g_1\n-\n(\\phi_r^2-\\phi_i^2)g_2\n\\right].\n\\end{align}\nCollecting the coefficients of $g_1$ and $g_2$, we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\n\\tau g_1\n=\n\\left[\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n-V_r+\\beta\n-\\sigma(\\phi_r^2+3\\phi_i^2)\n\\right]g_2\n+\n\\left(\nV_i-2\\sigma\\phi_r\\phi_i\n\\right)g_1 .\n\\end{equation}\nEquivalently,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\tau g_1\n=\n\\left[\n-\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n-V_r+\\beta\n-\\sigma(\\phi_r^2+3\\phi_i^2)\n\\right]g_2\n-\n\\left(\n2\\sigma\\phi_r\\phi_i-V_i\n\\right)g_1 .\n\\end{equation}\n\nFinally, replacing $\\Delta$ by its explicit expression, the linear stability eigenvalue problem can be written as\n\\begin{align}\n\\tau g_1\n&=\n\\left[\n-\\frac{1}{2}\n\\left(\n\\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial x^2}\n+\n\\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial y^2}\n\\right)\n-V_r+\\beta\n-\\sigma\\left(\\phi_r^2+3\\phi_i^2\\right)\n\\right]g_2\n-\n\\left(\n2\\sigma\\phi_r\\phi_i-V_i\n\\right)g_1,\n\\\\\n\\tau g_2\n&=\n\\left[\n+\\frac{1}{2}\n\\left(\n\\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial x^2}\n+\n\\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial y^2}\n\\right)\n+V_r-\\beta\n+\\sigma\\left(3\\phi_r^2+\\phi_i^2\\right)\n\\right]g_1\n+\n\\left(\n2\\sigma\\phi_r\\phi_i+V_i\n\\right)g_2 .\n\\end{align}\n\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\n\n% We analyse the linear stability of a stationary nonlinear mode by introducing a small perturbation in the form\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\Psi(x,y,z)=\n% \\left[\n% \\phi_r(x,y)+i\\phi_i(x,y)\n% +\\left(g_1(x,y)+ig_2(x,y)\\right)e^{\\tau z}\n% \\right]e^{i\\beta z},\n% \\end{equation}\n% where $\\phi_r$ and $\\phi_i$ are the real and imaginary parts of the stationary solution, $g_1$ and $g_2$ are infinitesimal perturbation eigenfunctions, and $\\tau$ is the corresponding perturbation growth rate.\n\n% For compactness, we write\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\phi=\\phi_r+i\\phi_i, \\qquad\n% \\eta=\\left(g_1+ig_2\\right)e^{\\tau z},\n% \\end{equation}\n% so that\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\Psi(x,y,z)=\\left[\\phi(x,y)+\\eta(x,y,z)\\right]e^{i\\beta z}.\n% \\end{equation}\n\n% The governing equation reads\n% \\begin{equation}\n% i\\frac{\\partial \\Psi}{\\partial z}\n% =\n% -\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\\Psi\n% -\\left(V_r-iV_i\\right)\\Psi\n% -\\sigma |\\Psi|^2\\Psi ,\n% \\end{equation}\n% where\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\Delta=\\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial x^2}\n% +\n% \\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial y^2}.\n% \\end{equation}\n\n% Substituting\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\Psi=\\left(\\phi+\\eta\\right)e^{i\\beta z}\n% \\end{equation}\n% into the governing equation gives\n% \\begin{equation}\n% i\\left[\n% \\frac{\\partial \\eta}{\\partial z}\n% +i\\beta(\\phi+\\eta)\n% \\right]\n% =\n% -\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta(\\phi+\\eta)\n% -\\left(V_r-iV_i\\right)(\\phi+\\eta)\n% -\\sigma |\\phi+\\eta|^2(\\phi+\\eta).\n% \\end{equation}\n% Since $\\partial\\eta/\\partial z=\\tau\\eta$, this becomes\n% \\begin{equation}\n% i\\tau\\eta-\\beta(\\phi+\\eta)\n% =\n% -\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta(\\phi+\\eta)\n% -\\left(V_r-iV_i\\right)(\\phi+\\eta)\n% -\\sigma |\\phi+\\eta|^2(\\phi+\\eta).\n% \\end{equation}\n\n% The unperturbed stationary mode satisfies\n% \\begin{equation}\n% -\\beta\\phi\n% =\n% -\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\\phi\n% -\\left(V_r-iV_i\\right)\\phi\n% -\\sigma |\\phi|^2\\phi .\n% \\end{equation}\n% Subtracting this stationary equation from the perturbed equation and retaining only terms that are linear in $\\eta$ yields\n% \\begin{equation}\n% i\\tau\\eta-\\beta\\eta\n% =\n% -\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\\eta\n% -\\left(V_r-iV_i\\right)\\eta\n% -\\sigma\\left(2|\\phi|^2\\eta+\\phi^2\\eta^*\\right).\n% \\end{equation}\n% Equivalently,\n% \\begin{equation}\n% i\\tau\\eta\n% =\n% \\left[\n% -\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n% -V_r+iV_i+\\beta\n% -2\\sigma |\\phi|^2\n% \\right]\\eta\n% -\\sigma \\phi^2\\eta^* .\n% \\end{equation}\n\n% We now separate this equation into its real and imaginary components. Using\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\phi=\\phi_r+i\\phi_i,\\qquad\n% \\eta=g_1+ig_2,\n% \\end{equation}\n% we have\n% \\begin{equation}\n% |\\phi|^2=\\phi_r^2+\\phi_i^2,\n% \\end{equation}\n% and\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\phi^2\n% =\n% (\\phi_r+i\\phi_i)^2\n% =\n% \\phi_r^2-\\phi_i^2+2i\\phi_r\\phi_i .\n% \\end{equation}\n% Furthermore,\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\eta^*=g_1-ig_2 .\n% \\end{equation}\n% It follows that\n% \\begin{align}\n% \\phi^2\\eta^*\n% &=\n% \\left(\\phi_r^2-\\phi_i^2+2i\\phi_r\\phi_i\\right)\n% \\left(g_1-ig_2\\right) \\notag\\\\\n% &=\n% \\left[\n% (\\phi_r^2-\\phi_i^2)g_1\n% +2\\phi_r\\phi_i g_2\n% \\right] \\notag\\\\\n% &\\quad\n% +i\\left[\n% 2\\phi_r\\phi_i g_1\n% -(\\phi_r^2-\\phi_i^2)g_2\n% \\right].\n% \\end{align}\n\n% The left-hand side is\n% \\begin{equation}\n% i\\tau\\eta\n% =\n% i\\tau(g_1+ig_2)\n% =\n% -\\tau g_2+i\\tau g_1.\n% \\end{equation}\n% Thus, its real and imaginary parts are $-\\tau g_2$ and $\\tau g_1$, respectively.\n\n% The contribution from the linear operator\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\left[\n% -\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n% -V_r+\\beta\n% -2\\sigma(\\phi_r^2+\\phi_i^2)\n% +iV_i\n% \\right](g_1+ig_2)\n% \\end{equation}\n% has real part\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\left[\n% -\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n% -V_r+\\beta\n% -2\\sigma(\\phi_r^2+\\phi_i^2)\n% \\right]g_1\n% -V_i g_2,\n% \\end{equation}\n% and imaginary part\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\left[\n% -\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n% -V_r+\\beta\n% -2\\sigma(\\phi_r^2+\\phi_i^2)\n% \\right]g_2\n% +V_i g_1.\n% \\end{equation}\n% The nonlinear coupling term $-\\sigma\\phi^2\\eta^*$ contributes\n% \\begin{equation}\n% -\\sigma\n% \\left[\n% (\\phi_r^2-\\phi_i^2)g_1\n% +2\\phi_r\\phi_i g_2\n% \\right]\n% \\end{equation}\n% to the real part and\n% \\begin{equation}\n% -\\sigma\n% \\left[\n% 2\\phi_r\\phi_i g_1\n% -(\\phi_r^2-\\phi_i^2)g_2\n% \\right]\n% \\end{equation}\n% to the imaginary part.\n\n% Combining the real parts gives\n% \\begin{equation}\n% -\\tau g_2\n% =\n% \\left[\n% -\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n% -V_r+\\beta\n% -\\sigma(3\\phi_r^2+\\phi_i^2)\n% \\right]g_1\n% -\\left(V_i+2\\sigma\\phi_r\\phi_i\\right)g_2 .\n% \\end{equation}\n% Equivalently,\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\tau g_2\n% =\n% \\left[\n% \\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n% +V_r-\\beta\n% +\\sigma(3\\phi_r^2+\\phi_i^2)\n% \\right]g_1\n% +\n% \\left(V_i+2\\sigma\\phi_r\\phi_i\\right)g_2 .\n% \\end{equation}\n\n% Similarly, the imaginary parts yield\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\tau g_1\n% =\n% \\left[\n% -\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n% -V_r+\\beta\n% -\\sigma(\\phi_r^2+3\\phi_i^2)\n% \\right]g_2\n% +\n% \\left(V_i-2\\sigma\\phi_r\\phi_i\\right)g_1 .\n% \\end{equation}\n% This can also be written as\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\tau g_1\n% =\n% \\left[\n% -\\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\n% -V_r+\\beta\n% -\\sigma(\\phi_r^2+3\\phi_i^2)\n% \\right]g_2\n% -\n% \\left(2\\sigma\\phi_r\\phi_i-V_i\\right)g_1 .\n% \\end{equation}\n\n% Therefore, the linear stability eigenvalue problem is\n% \\begin{align}\n% \\tau g_1\n% &=\n% \\left[\n% -\\frac{1}{2}\n% \\left(\n% \\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial x^2}\n% +\n% \\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial y^2}\n% \\right)\n% -V_r+\\beta\n% -\\sigma\\left(\\phi_r^2+3\\phi_i^2\\right)\n% \\right]g_2\n% -\\left(2\\sigma\\phi_r\\phi_i-V_i\\right)g_1,\n% \\\\\n% \\tau g_2\n% &=\n% \\left[\n% \\frac{1}{2}\n% \\left(\n% \\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial x^2}\n% +\n% \\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial y^2}\n% \\right)\n% +V_r-\\beta\n% +\\sigma\\left(3\\phi_r^2+\\phi_i^2\\right)\n% \\right]g_1\n% +\\left(2\\sigma\\phi_r\\phi_i+V_i\\right)g_2 .\n% \\end{align}\n% The stationary mode is linearly stable if all perturbation eigenvalues satisfy\n% \\begin{equation}\n% {\\rm Re}(\\tau)\\leq 0.\n% \\end{equation}\n% Conversely, any eigenvalue with ${\\rm Re}(\\tau)>0$ gives rise to an exponentially growing perturbation and therefore signals linear instability.\n\n% \\noindent\\textbf{S1. Linear surface modes at the interface.}\n% \\section{}\n\n\\par\\vspace{0.25\\baselineskip}\n\\noindent{\\normalfont\\bfseries S2. \\textbf{Linear surface modes at the interface.}}\n\\par\\vspace{0.25\\baselineskip}\n\nIn the linear regime, the functions of linear modes for $\\sigma = 0$ of Eq.~(1) are sought as $\\Psi(x,y,z)=\\phi(x,y)e^{i\\beta_\\text{lin} z}$, here, $\\phi(x,y)$ is the linear mode, and $\\beta_\\text{lin}$ is its corresponding eigenvalue (propagation constant). Substituting this expression into Eq. (1), one can get\n\\begin{align}\\label{eqs1}\n\\beta_\\text{lin}\\phi(x,y) =\\mathcal{H}\\phi(x,y);\\quad \\mathcal{H}= \\frac{1}{2}\\left(\\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial x^2}+\\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial y^2}\\right)+(V_r-iV_i).\n\\end{align}\nThis linear eigenvalue problem (\\ref{eqs1}) can be solved numerically using a standard eigenvalue solver.\n\nTo elucidate the optical characteristics of surface dissipative solitons, it is crucial to examine the modal profiles and eigenvalue spectra of the associated surface modes.\nIn a transversely truncated single-waveguide array, a fundamental localized surface mode is confined at the interface for a given parameter $\\gamma$. The real and imaginary parts of its eigenvalue both decrease monotonically as $\\gamma$ increases [Fig.~\\textcolor{blue}{1}(d) in the main text]. A critical value $\\gamma_0$ delineates two distinct regimes: for $\\gamma < \\gamma_0$, the mode exhibits net loss, whereas for $\\gamma > \\gamma_0$, it becomes gain-dominated. \nRepresentative gain and loss field profiles of the fundamental mode ($\\phi(x,y)$ is normalized as $\\int_{-\\infty}^{+\\infty}\\int_{-\\infty}^{+\\infty}|\\phi(x,y)|^2dxdy=1$) are shown in the upper panels of Figs.~\\ref{figSI1}(a,b), with their corresponding dynamical evolutions presented in the lower panels.\nBy considering the factor $e^{i\\beta_\\text{lin} z} = e^{i(\\beta_\\text{lin,r}+i\\beta_\\text{lin,i})z}=e^{i\\beta_\\text{lin,r}z}\\cdot e^{-\\beta_\\text{lin,i} z}$, it can also be inferred that $\\beta_\\text{lin,i}<0$ corresponds to a gain mode, whereas $\\beta_\\text{lin,i}>0$ represents a loss mode.\n\nIn the transversely truncated two-waveguide array, two distinct families of surface modes emerge at the interface: an in-phase mode and an out-of-phase mode. These modes exhibit markedly different field profiles and phase structures, as illustrated in Figs.~\\ref{figSI1}(c,d).\nThe modal profiles show that the in-phase mode retains a finite field amplitude at $x=0$ and $y=-d/2$, while the out-of-phase mode develops a node at this point. The phase contour maps confirm these symmetries uniform color regions indicate in-phase behavior, whereas alternating color patterns signify out-of-phase characteristics.\nAs the number of waveguides truncated along the $y$-axis increases, the number of supported surface modes correspondingly grows. In a transversely truncated three-waveguide array, in addition to the in-phase and out-of-phase modes, an antisymmetric mode also emerges [Fig.~\\ref{figSI1}(e-g)]. In this dissipative system, the eigenvalue of the in-phase mode is generally slightly higher than that of the out-of-phase mode, while the newly emerging surface mode possesses an eigenvalue that resides between them [Figs.~\\textcolor{blue}{1}(e,f) in the main text]. The antisymmetric mode features intensity peaks localized in the two outermost waveguides. These enriched modal structures provide valuable guidance for understanding the behavior of nonlinear dissipative surface solitons.\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[htbp]\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=1\\columnwidth]{figureS1.pdf}\n\\caption{\nFundamental gain (a) and loss (b) mode profiles (upper panels) and their propagation dynamics (lower panels) in a transversely truncated single-waveguide array. Localized gap modes in dual- (c,d) and triple-truncated (e–g) waveguide arrays; upper panels show field modulus distributions and lower panels show phase profiles.\n}\n\\label{figSI1}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n% \\noindent\\textbf{S2. Propagation examples of fundamental DSSs in a single truncated array.} \n% \\section{Propagation examples of fundamental DSSs in a single truncated array.}\n\n\\par\\vspace{0.25\\baselineskip}\n\\noindent{\\normalfont\\bfseries S3. \\textbf{Propagation examples of fundamental DSSs in a single truncated array.}}\n\\par\\vspace{0.25\\baselineskip}\n\nFigure \\ref{figSI2} illustrates the propagation dynamics of fundamental dissipative surface solitons under defocusing ($\\sigma=-1$) and focusing ($\\sigma=+1$) nonlinearities. A random perturbation with an amplitude of $10\\%$ is added to the input beam.\nIn panel (a), corresponding to the defocusing case, the evolution of the soliton amplitude $Amp$ (black curve) and power $U$ (blue curve) as functions of the propagation distance $z$ is shown. After a short distance characterized by weak oscillations, both quantities rapidly converge to constant values and remain nearly unchanged over long propagation distances. The accompanying field modulus snapshots at representative propagation distances ($z=1$, $188$, $391$, and $830$) further confirm that the field profile preserves its shape and localization, demonstrating stable propagation supported by the combined action of the surface lattice, linear gain and loss, and defocusing nonlinearity. In contrast, panel (b) displays the propagation behavior in the focusing regime. Here, both the amplitude and the power exhibit pronounced oscillations throughout propagation, without settling into a steady-state value. The corresponding field distributions reveal the distortion and the emergence of radiative wave patterns, reflecting strong breathing dynamics and power redistribution. These features indicate that the fundamental dissipative soliton becomes dynamically unstable under focusing nonlinearity.\n\n\\begin{figure*}[htbp]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\includegraphics[width=0.75\\columnwidth]{figureS2.pdf}\n\t\\caption{Propagation dynamics of fundamental dissipative solitons under defocusing (a) and focusing (b) nonlinearities. The evolution of the soliton amplitude $Amp$ (black curves) and power $U$ (blue curves) as functions of the propagation distance $z$ is shown, and the right panels display the corresponding field modulus profiles at different propagation distances $z$. $\\gamma=-0.6$ in (a) and (b).\n}\n\t\\label{figSI2}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n% \\noindent\\textbf{S3. Phase, phase-gradient, and power-flow of IP and OOP DSSs in dual truncated arrays.}\n% \\section{Phase, phase-gradient, and power-flow of IP and OOP DSSs in dual truncated arrays.}\n\n\\par\\vspace{0.25\\baselineskip}\n\\noindent{\\normalfont\\bfseries S4. \\textbf{Phase, phase-gradient, and power-flow of IP and OOP DSSs in dual truncated arrays.}}\n\\par\\vspace{0.25\\baselineskip}\nFor both in-phase and out-of-phase dissipative surface solitons, we examined their $y$-direction profiles at $x=0$. The corresponding phase $\\varphi_y=\\arctan[\\phi_i(x=0,y),\\phi_r(x=0,y)]$, phase-gradient $d\\varphi_y/dy$, and power-flow $S_y=|\\phi(x=0,y)|^2d\\varphi_y/dy$ distributions are shown in Fig.~\\ref{figSI3}. For in-phase dissipative surface solitons, the $y$-direction phase remains nearly smooth, showing no discernible jump between the two lobes [Fig.~\\ref{figSI3}(a)]. The transverse phase-gradient is correspondingly weak, with only slight oscillations near the peaks [Fig.~\\ref{figSI3}(b)], resulting in merely small localized variations in the power-flow and essentially no net transverse power transfer [Fig.~\\ref{figSI3}(c)]. These features allow the in-phase surface soliton to retain a stable steady state under defocusing nonlinearity and the surface lattice. In contrast, out-of-phase dissipative surface solitons exhibit a pronounced phase step--close to $\\pi$--between the lobes [Fig.~\\ref{figSI3}(d)]. This sharp discontinuity generates a strongly localized phase slope near $y=-d/2$ [Fig.~\\ref{figSI3}(e)], which produces distinct positive and negative power-flow peaks in that narrow region. The associated intense transverse power-flow enhance delocalization in the presence of defocusing nonlinearity, and together with the gain (or loss) array configuration along the $y$ direction, ultimately driving out-of-phase surface soliton unstable [Fig.~\\ref{figSI3}(f)].\n\n\\begin{figure*}[htbp]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\includegraphics[width=0.75\\columnwidth]{figureS3.pdf}\n\t\\caption{Phase $\\varphi_y$ (a,d), transverse phase-gradient $d\\varphi_y/dy$ (b,e), and power-flow $S_y$ (c,f) distributions of the in-phase (a-c) and out-of-phase (d-f) dissipative surface solitons along $y$-direction. $\\gamma=-0.6$ and $\\sigma=-1$ in all panels.\n}\n\t\\label{figSI3}\n\\end{figure*}\n\\begin{figure*}[htbp]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\includegraphics[width=0.75\\columnwidth]{figureS4.pdf}\n\t\\caption{Propagation dynamics of in-phase (a) and out-of-phase (b) dissipative solitons. The evolution of the soliton amplitude $Amp$ (black curves) and power $U$ (blue curves) with the propagation distance $z$, and the right panels display the corresponding field modulus $|\\phi|$ and phase $\\varphi$ at different propagation distances $z$. $\\gamma=-0.6$ and $\\sigma=-1$ in (a) and (b).\n}\n\t\\label{figSI4}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\n% \\noindent\\textbf{S4. Propagation examples of IP and OOP DSSs in dual truncated arrays.}\n% \\section{Propagation examples of IP and OOP DSSs in dual truncated arrays.}\n\n\\par\\vspace{0.25\\baselineskip}\n\\noindent{\\normalfont\\bfseries S5. \\textbf{Propagation examples of IP and OOP DSSs in dual truncated arrays.}}\n\\par\\vspace{0.25\\baselineskip}\nThe propagation examples of in-phase and out-of-phase dissipative surface solitons for $\\sigma=-1$ are shown in Fig.~\\ref{figSI4}. Panels (a) and (b) correspond to the in-phase and out-of-phase configurations, respectively. In each case, the evolution of peak amplitude $Amp$ (black curves) and power $U$ (blue curves) with propagation distance $z$ is depicted.\n\nFor the in-phase dissipative surface soliton [panel (a)], both the amplitude and power exhibit only weak transient oscillations at the initial stage and rapidly relax to stationary values. They remain essentially unchanged over long propagation distances up to $z=3000$, indicating a robust behavior of stable dissipative solitons. The accompanying field-modulus snapshots $|\\phi|$ and phase snapshots $\\varphi$ at representative propagation distances ($z=1$ and $z=1000$) confirm that the soliton preserves its localized structure and symmetry. \n\nIn contrast, for the out-of-phase dissipative surface soliton [panel (b)], the amplitude and power rapidly stabilize to a steady-state value following an initial transient regime.\nThe phase distributions initially exhibit an out-of-phase configuration, characterized by a phase discontinuity between the two lobes. As the amplitude and power converge to constant values, the phase profile gradually transitions to an in-phase distribution. This behavior suggests that the initially unstable out-of-phase dissipative surface solitons evolve into stable in-phase dissipative surface solitons.\n\n\n% \\noindent\\textbf{S5. Derivation of the linear stability eigenvalue problem.}\n\n\n\\par\\vspace{0.25\\baselineskip}\n\\noindent{\\normalfont\\bfseries S6. \\textbf{Instability dynamics near the stability boundaries in different truncated waveguide arrays.}}\n\\par\\vspace{0.25\\baselineskip}\nThe propagation of representative unstable states near the stability boundaries is shown in Fig.~\\ref{figSI5}. For the fundamental soliton in the single truncated array, both the peak amplitude $Amp$ and the power $U$ undergo pronounced oscillations during propagation [Fig.~\\ref{figSI5}(a)]. The state remains spatially localized over the simulated distance, but it does not relax to a stationary attractor. Instead, the instability appears as a breathing-type dynamics, indicating a weak oscillatory instability close to the stability edge.\n\nA different behaviour is found for the out-of-phase states in the dual and triple truncated arrays. As shown in Figs.~\\ref{figSI5}(b,c), the peak amplitude oscillates persistently, whereas the total power decreases in an oscillatory fashion. \nDuring propagation, the localized peaks residing on different rows remain coupled and continuously exchange power. After sufficiently long propagation, this inter-row coupling drives the field towards a phase-locked configuration: both the amplitude and the power gradually approach well-defined stationary values, and the initially out-of-phase state eventually relaxes into a stable in-phase dissipative surface soliton.\n\nFor the asymmetric state in the triple truncated array, the instability follows another route [Fig.~\\ref{figSI5}(d)]. Both the amplitude $Amp$ and the power $U$ increase slowly with propagation distance $z$. Nevertheless, the corresponding field profile $|\\phi|$ remains well localized over the finite propagation distance considered here, namely $z\\leq 3000$. This behaviour is consistent with the fact that the selected state lies close to the stability boundary, where the associated instability growth rate is small. As a result, the unstable perturbation develops only gradually, allowing the soliton to preserve its localized structure over a long but finite propagation distance.\n\n\\begin{figure*}[htbp]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\includegraphics[width=0.75\\columnwidth]{figureS5.pdf}\n\t\\caption{Propagation dynamics of unstable DSSs in different truncated complex lattices. Black and blue curves show the peak amplitude $Amp$ and power $U$, respectively. (a) Fundamental surface soliton in a single truncated array, $\\sigma=+1$, and $\\gamma=-0.646$; (b) OOP DSS in a dual truncated array, $\\gamma=-0.656$; (c) OOP DSS in a triple truncated array, $\\gamma=-0.655$; and (d) AS in a triple truncated array, $\\gamma=-0.656$. $\\sigma=-1$ in (b-d).\n}\n\t\\label{figSI5}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\n\\par\\vspace{0.25\\baselineskip}\n\\noindent{\\normalfont\\bfseries S7. \\textbf{Weak-input excitation of stable dissipative surface solitons.}}\n\\par\\vspace{0.25\\baselineskip}\nTo clarify whether the excitation of stable dissipative surface solitons has a rigid threshold character, we performed additional propagation simulations using weak Gaussian inputs close to the zero-intensity background. The results are shown in Fig.~\\ref{figSI6}. In the single truncated array, a low-amplitude Gaussian beam $\\Psi(x,y,z=0)=A\\exp[-(x^2+y^2)/w_0^2]$ with $A=0.01,w_0=0.5$ is gradually amplified during propagation and evolves into a stable fundamental dissipative surface soliton [Fig.~\\ref{figSI6}(a)]. Both the peak amplitude $Amp$ and the power $U$ increase from nearly zero and then saturate to well-defined stationary values.\n\nA similar excitation process is observed in the dual truncated array. When a weak in-phase Gaussian beam array $\\Psi(x,y,z=0)=A\\exp[-(x^2+y^2)/w_0^2]+A\\exp[-(x^2+(y+d)^2)/w_0^2]$ with the same $A$ and $w_0$ is launched into the structure, the field evolves into a stable in-phase dissipative surface soliton [Fig.~\\ref{figSI6}(b)]. Again, both $Amp$ and $U$ grow from the weak input level and eventually approach constant values, indicating the formation of a stationary nonlinear dissipative state.\n\nThese results show that, in the defocusing regime considered here, the excitation of stable dissipative surface solitons is not strictly rigid or threshold-like. Instead, the stable states can be dynamically reached from weak perturbations close to the zero background. The weak input is first amplified by the localized gain, then reshaped by diffraction, lattice confinement and Kerr self-action, and finally arrested by the global gain-loss balance.\n\n\\begin{figure*}[htbp]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\includegraphics[width=0.75\\columnwidth]{figureS6.pdf}\n\t\\caption{Evolution of the peak amplitude $Amp$ (Black curves) and power $U$ (Blue curves) under weak input excitation in truncated complex waveguide arrays. (a) in a single truncated array, and (b) in a dual truncated array. $A=0.01,p_r=4,p_i=1,d=4.5,w_0=0.5,\\gamma=-0.646,\\sigma=-1$ in (a) and (b).\n}\n\t\\label{figSI6}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\end{document} \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: apssamp_main.tex\n================================================\n% ****** Start of file apssamp.tex ******\n%\n% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4.2 distribution.\n% Version 4.2a of REVTeX, December 2014\n%\n% Copyright (c) 2014 The American Physical Society.\n%\n% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.\n%\n% TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed\n% as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.2\n%\n% See the REVTeX 4 README file\n% It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:\n%\n% 1) latex apssamp.tex\n% 2) bibtex apssamp\n% 3) latex apssamp.tex\n% 4) latex apssamp.tex\n%\n% \\documentclass[%\n% % reprint,\n% %superscriptaddress,\n% %groupedaddress,\n% %unsortedaddress,\n% %runinaddress,\n% %frontmatterverbose, \n% %preprint,\n% %preprintnumbers,\n% %nofootinbib,\n% %nobibnotes,\n% %bibnotes,\n% amsmath,amssymb,\n% % aps,\n% prl,\n% %prb,\n% %rmp,\n% %prstab,\n% %prstper,\n% %floatfix,\n% ]{revtex4-2}\n\n\\documentclass[superscriptaddress]{revtex4-2} %twocolumn, \n\\usepackage{bm}\n\\usepackage{changes}\n\\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files\n\n\n\\usepackage{titlesec}\n\n% section\n\\titleformat{\\section}\n{\\raggedright\\bfseries}\n{\\thesection}{1em}{}\n\n% subsection\n\\titleformat{\\subsection}\n{\\raggedright\\bfseries}\n{\\thesubsection}{1em}{}\n\n%\\usepackage{hyperref}% add hypertext capabilities\n%\\usepackage[mathlines]{lineno}% Enable numbering of text and display math\n%\\linenumbers\\relax % Commence numbering lines\n\n%\\usepackage[showframe,%Uncomment any one of the following lines to test \n%%scale=0.7, marginratio={1:1, 2:3}, ignoreall,% default settings\n%%text={7in,10in},centering,\n%%margin=1.5in,\n%%total={6.5in,8.75in}, top=1.2in, left=0.9in, includefoot,\n%%height=10in,a5paper,hmargin={3cm,0.8in},\n%]{geometry}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\\preprint{APS/123-QED}\n\n\\title{Dissipative surface solitons in two-dimensional truncated lattices with linear gain and loss}% Force line breaks with \n\n\n\n\\author{Changming Huang}\n\\email{hcm123\\_2004@126.com}\n\\affiliation{Department of Physics, Changzhi University, Changzhi, Shanxi 046011, China}\n\n\\author{Yan Wang}\n\\affiliation{Department of Physics, Changzhi University, Changzhi, Shanxi 046011, China}\n\n\\author{Pengcheng Liu}\n\\affiliation{Department of Physics, Changzhi University, Changzhi, Shanxi 046011, China}\n\n\\author{Qidong Fu}\n\\email{jellyfqd@sjtu.edu.cn}\n\\affiliation{School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China}\n\n\\author{Liangwei Dong}\n\\email{dlw\\_0@163.com}\n\\affiliation{Department of Physics, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou, China, 310023}\n\n\\date{\\today}\n\n\n\\date{\\today}% It is always \\today, today,\n % but any date may be explicitly specified\n\n\\begin{abstract}\nDissipative solitons constitute a robust class of self-localized nonlinear states sustained by the dynamic balance between nonlinearity and gain-loss, possessing an intrinsic stability that stems from their fundamental attractor nature. When combined with lattice truncation, this balance gives rise to dissipative surface solitons (DSSs), whose existence and stability are jointly dictated by boundary-induced confinement and non-Hermitian dynamics. In two-dimensional truncated lattices with linear gain and loss, surface localization emerges within gap regimes, where families of DSSs bifurcate from linear surface localized gain modes as the nonlinearity increases. Increasing the number of waveguide rows at the interface enriches the diversity of supported surface modes in both linear and nonlinear regimes. Although multiple DSS families with distinct phase configurations may coexist within the same gap, their dynamical stability is strongly phase selective. These insights establish linear gain-loss engineering as a powerful mechanism for controlling nonlinear surface localization and provide practical guidelines for realizing robust nonlinear surface states in gain-loss-tailored photonic platforms.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\\keywords{Dissipative surface solitons\\sep Linear gain-loss engineering\n\t\\sep Non-Hermitian photonics \\sep Stability}%Use showkeys class option if keyword\n %display desired\n\\maketitle\n\n\\section{Introduction}\nDissipative solitons--self-organized, localized wave packets arising in non-conservative media--constitute a fundamental cornerstone in the study of non-equilibrium dynamics~\\cite{belashov2005solitary,Purwins2010,Grelu2012,Peng2018,Rosanov2026}. Transcending the classical framework of conservative dynamics, these self-sustained entities are governed by a dual-balance architecture: while the interplay between nonlinearity and dispersion/diffraction ensures temporal/spatial localization, their stationarity is inextricably linked to a continuous energy exchange between localized gain and loss~\\cite{Guo2016,malomed2022multidimensionalCSF}. This intricate stabilization regime, described by the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation~\\cite{Aranson2002,ankiewicz2008dissipative,skarka2006stability}, has been rigorously studied across a broad range of physical systems. Such investigations span from ultrafast fiber lasers, where dissipative structures are mediated by saturable absorption~\\cite{rosanov2002spatial,rosanov2005curvilinear,veretenov2016rotating, Veretenov2017}, to exotic configurations wherein linear gain is compensated by nonlinear loss~\\cite{Hung2017,Perego2018}.\n\n\nA fundamental tenet in this field is that the stability and existence of dissipative solitons are critically dictated by the underlying gain-loss landscape~\\cite{Pernet2022,BlancoRedondo2023,Yan2025lpr}. It is a well-recognized constraint that homogeneous linear gain precludes the formation of stable one-dimensional ($1$D) solitons, as the unbounded growth of the background pedestal inevitably triggers a global instability~\\cite{malomed1997stability}. Consequently, achieving robust localization necessitates the strategic implementation of spatially confined gain profiles. Within this localized paradigm, a wide range of nonlinear loss-mediated states has been elucidated. These range from $1$D defect modes and symmetry-breaking multi-peaked states~\\cite{kartashov2010dissipativeOL,kartashov2011symmetryPRA,huang2020dissipativeOE} to higher-dimensional topological states, including vortex solitons and rotating clusters characterized by non-trivial winding numbers~\\cite{kartashov2010vortexOL,borovkova2011rotatingOL,Huang2025CSF,veretenov2016rotatingPRL}.\nFurthermore, the emergence of parity-time symmetry and non-Hermitian topology has redefined our understanding of dissipative phases. By converging classical nonlinear optics with quantum-inspired symmetries, these paradigms afford an unparalleled degree of structural protection against stochastic perturbations, thereby providing a fertile framework for the realization of exotic, self-organized solitonic states~\\cite{musslimani2008opticalPRL,konotop2016nonlinearRMP,suchkovnonlinearLPR2016,kartashov2015topologicalPRL}.\n\nDespite these advances, dissipative interfaces introduce additional constraints that remain less fully understood than their conservative counterparts. While surface solitons at the boundaries of optical lattices are well established in conservative nonlinear systems~\\cite{kartashov2006surfacePRL,Smirnova2020,Ivanov2021,Tang2022}, their dissipative counterparts are governed by the combined requirements of gain-loss balance, nonlinear self-action, and dynamical stability. Previous studies on dissipative surface states~\\cite{kartashov2010dissipativeEPL,he2012stableOL,huang2019dissipative,kartashov2019edgeOL} and localized gain structures~\\cite{kartashov2011twoOL,borovkova2011rotatingOL,lobanov2010stableOL,kartashov2010vortexOL,li2024stablePRL,Huang2025CSF} have revealed a rich stability landscape, highlighting the need to clarify how boundary truncation organizes nonlinear localized states in gain-loss lattices.\n\nIn this work, we investigate geometry-controlled two-dimensional ($2$D) dissipative surface soliton (DSS) families in transversely truncated multi-row complex waveguide arrays with spatially distributed linear gain and loss. While dissipative surface solitons have been explored in several gain-loss systems~\\cite{Mihalache2008PRE,zezyulin2023continuousOL,shen2025edgeFOP}, how the number of retained transverse waveguide rows controls their linear origin, global power balance, spatial localization and stability has not been systematically clarified.\nBy comparing single-, double- and triple-row truncated lattices, we show that transverse truncation acts as a geometric control parameter that enriches the accessible linear and nonlinear surface-state landscape. We show that DSSs bifurcate from gap-localized surface gain modes in the underlying linear spectrum. Importantly, our stability analysis and direct propagation simulations reveal that stable stationary propagation is restricted to in-phase DSSs, whereas out-of-phase and antisymmetric states become unstable. These results identify transverse truncation as a geometry-based route for controlling $2$D dissipative surface localization in non-Hermitian optical lattices.\n\n\\section{Model}\nWe consider the dynamical propagation of light beams along the $z$-axis in a cubic nonlinear medium featuring a truncated gain-loss lattice, described by the nonlinear Schr\\\"{o}dinger equation for the field amplitude $\\Psi$:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq1}\n\ti\\frac{\\partial \\Psi}{\\partial z} =-\\frac{1}{2}\\left(\\frac{\\partial^2\\Psi}{\\partial x^2}+\\frac{\\partial^2\\Psi}{\\partial y^2}\\right)-(V_r-iV_i)\\Psi-\\sigma\\left|\\Psi\\right|^2\\Psi,\n\\end{equation}\nHere, $x$ and $y$ are the transverse coordinates, while $z$ represents the longitudinal propagation direction. $\\sigma$ is the Kerr nonlinearity coefficient, with $\\sigma=1$ corresponding to focusing and $\\sigma=-1$ to defocusing nonlinearity. $V_r-iV_i$ is the complex lattice potential, with $V_{r}$ representing the optical lattice profile and $V_{i}$ specifying the spatially distributed linear gain and loss. Their expressions are given by $V_{r}(x,y)=p_{r}\\cos^2(x)\\sum_{k=m}^{k=n}\\exp\\left[-(y-kd)^2/w^2\\right]$ and $V_{i}(x,y)=\\left[p_{i}\\sin(2x)+\\gamma\\right]\\sum_{k=m}^{k=n}\\exp\\left[-(y-kd)^2/w^2\\right]$ for $x\\geq 0$, and $V_{r,i}(x,y)=0$ for $x<0$. Here, $p_{r}$ denotes the depth of the two-dimensional optical lattice, $|p_{i}+\\gamma|$ represents the amplitude of gain or loss, $w$ specifies the width of individual waveguides along the $y$ direction, and $d$ is the period of the waveguide array in the same direction. \n$k$ is an integer displacement index, so that the centre of the $k$-th waveguide row is located at $y=kd$. The integers $m$ and $n$ determine the lower and upper limits of the retained waveguide rows, respectively, and therefore specify the transverse truncation geometry.\nWe emphasize that, owing to the $\\gamma$-dependent gain-loss landscape, the present complex lattice potential is neither globally nor partially $\\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric, even before truncation.\nGlobal $\\mathcal{PT}$ symmetry requires $V(x,y)=V^*(-x,-y)$, whereas partial\n$\\mathcal{PT}$ symmetry requires $V(x,y)=V^{*}(-x,y)$. Thus, this truncated lattice is treated as a general non-Hermitian complex lattice with spatially distributed linear gain and loss.\nThe model is considered in the small-signal gain regime, where the gain and loss coefficients can be approximated as intensity independent. In this regime, gain saturation is a higher-order correction, while appreciable Kerr nonlinear phase shifts may still accumulate in highly nonlinear and tightly confined waveguide systems, such as AlGaAs, or doped active waveguide arrays~\\cite{guo2009observation,dolgaleva2011compact,el2018nonNP}.\n\nThe proposed complex lattice potential can be realized in well-established photonic platforms. In femtosecond laser-written waveguide arrays, the refractive index profile is determined by the spatial arrangement and writing parameters of individual waveguides, enabling flexible control of discrete diffraction and wave propagation dynamics~\\cite{streltsov2002study,szameit2010discrete}. The spatially distributed gain and loss can be implemented via optical pumping in doped dielectric waveguides or by controlled absorption engineering~\\cite{ruter2010observation,belitsch2022gain}. Such waveguide lattice systems have been widely used for the experimental realization of complex non-Hermitian optical potentials~\\cite{bandres2018topological,el2019dawn,ashida2020non}.\n\n\nThe dissipative surface solitons supported by Eq.~(\\ref{eq1}) take the form $\\Psi=\\phi e^{i\\beta z}=(\\phi_r+i\\phi_i)e^{i\\beta z}$, where $\\beta$ is the real-valued propagation constant, and $\\phi$, $\\phi_{r}$, and $\\phi_{i}$ denote the complex field and its real and imaginary components, respectively. These components $\\phi_{r}$ and $\\phi_{i}$ are governed by the coupled equations:\n\\begin{align}\n\t\\frac{1}{2}\\left (\\frac{\\partial^2 \\phi_{r}}{\\partial x^2}+\\frac{\\partial^2 \\phi_{r}}{\\partial y^2}\\right )+(V_{r}-\\beta) \\phi_{r}+V_{i} \\phi_{i}+\\sigma(\\phi_{r}^{3}+\\phi_{i}^{2} \\phi_{r})=0, \\label{eq2} \\\\\n\t\\frac{1}{2}\\left (\\frac{\\partial^2 \\phi_{i}}{\\partial x^2}+\\frac{\\partial^2 \\phi_{i}}{\\partial y^2}\\right )+(V_{r}-\\beta)\\phi_{i}-V_{i} \\phi_{r}+\\sigma(\\phi_{r}^{2} \\phi_{i}+\\phi_{i}^{3})=0. \\label{eq3}\n\\end{align}\nEqs.~(\\ref{eq2}) and (\\ref{eq3}) are solved numerically via a Newton iteration scheme constrained by the condition\n\\begin{align}\n\t\\frac{\\partial U}{\\partial z}=\\iint2V_{i}(x,y)|\\phi_r(x,y)+i\\phi_i(x,y)|^2dxdy=0, \\label{eq4}\n\\end{align}\nensuring convergence to dissipative soliton states maintained by the power balance, with\npower $U=\\iint[\\phi^2_r(x,y)+\\phi^2_i(x,y)]dxdy$.\nIn contrast to conventional Ginzburg-Landau-type dissipative solitons stabilized by nonlinear gain or loss, these soliton states discussed in this work are dissipative nonlinear localized modes supported by Kerr self-action, lattice confinement and the global power balance of spatially distributed linear gain and loss~\\cite{he2012stableOL,zezyulin2011solitonsOL,wimmer2015observationNC}. In the following, we fix $p_r=4$, $p_i=1$, $d=4.5$, and $w=1.5$, and vary $k$, $\\sigma$, and $\\gamma$ to discuss the properties of the dissipative surface solitons.\n\nThe dynamical stability of dissipative surface solitons is examined via a linear stability analysis of the stationary solutions by introducing small perturbations of the form~\\cite{kartashov2006surfacePRL,deconinck2006computing,yang2010nonlinear}\n\\begin{align}\n\t\\Psi(x,y,z)=\\{\\phi_r(x,y)+i\\phi_i(x,y)+[g_1(x,y)+ig_2(x,y)]e^{\\tau z}\\}e^{i\\beta z},\\label{eq5}\n\\end{align}\nwhere $\\tau$ is the perturbation growth rate (which can be complex), and $g_1(x,y)$ and $g_2(x,y)$ denote the real and imaginary components of the perturbation, respectively.\nSubstituting Eq. (\\ref{eq5}) into Eq. (\\ref{eq1}) and linearizing it around $\\phi_r(x,y)$ and $\\phi_i(x,y)$, one obtains a coupled set of linear eigenvalue equations:\n\\begin{align}\n\t\\tau g_1 &= \\left [-\\frac{1}{2}\\left (\\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial x^2}+\\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial y^2}\\right ) - V_r + \\beta - \\sigma(3\\phi_i^2 + \\phi_r^2)\\right ]g_2 -(2\\sigma\\phi_r\\phi_i - V_i)g_1, \\label{eq6} \\\\\n\t\\tau g_2 &= \\left [+\\frac{1}{2}\\left (\\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial x^2}+\\frac{\\partial^2}{\\partial y^2}\\right ) + V_r - \\beta + \\sigma(3\\phi_r^2 + \\phi_i^2)\\right ]g_1 +(2\\sigma\\phi_r\\phi_i + V_i)g_2. \\label{eq7}\n\\end{align}\nThe detailed derivation is given in Section \\textcolor{black}{S1} of the Supporting Information, and the resulting eigenvalue problem is solved numerically using a finite-difference method. Linear stability requires $\\text{Re}(\\tau)=\\tau_r\\leq 0$ for all perturbation eigenvalues; any eigenvalue with $\\tau_r>0$ renders the dissipative soliton unstable.\n\n\n\\section{Results and discussion}\\label{sec3}\nWe first examine the linear spectra and eigenmode profiles of different transversely truncated complex lattices. Linear surface gain modes provide the seeds for the nonlinear dissipative surface soliton branches. We then consider single, dual and triple truncated arrays in sequence. For each geometry, we construct the corresponding DSS families and characterize their existence, stability, and propagation dynamics. This stepwise analysis reveals how the number of retained waveguide rows acts as a geometric control parameter for two-dimensional dissipative surface localization.\n\n\\subsection{Lattices and linear eigenvalues}\nIn this work, we investigate the optical properties of dissipative surface solitons formed at an interface. Three types of transversely truncated waveguide arrays with their linear gain-loss profiles are considered and presented in Figs.~\\ref{fig1}(a-c), showing that the structures are spatially truncated along both the $x$ and $y$ axes.\nThis truncated linear gain-loss landscape differs fundamentally from conventional $\\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric or partially $\\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric configurations \\cite{musslimani2008opticalPRL,konotop2016nonlinearRMP,el2018nonNP,suchkovnonlinearLPR2016,Kang2023,Yan2025lpr}.\n\\begin{figure*}%[t]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\includegraphics[width=0.99\\columnwidth]{figure1.pdf}\n\t\\caption{(a-c) Optical lattice profiles $V_r$ (top panels) and linear gain-loss landscapes $V_i$ (bottom panels) for transversely truncated single-, double-, and triple-waveguide arrays. White lines in (a) denote the $y=0$ cross-sectional profiles of $V_r$ and $V_i$.\n\t\t(d-f) Eigenvalue $\\beta_\\text{lin}=\\beta_\\text{lin,r}+i\\beta_\\text{lin,i}$ of linear localized surface modes supported at the lattice interface as functions of the parameter $\\gamma$. Solid lines indicate the real parts of the eigenvalues ($\\beta_\\text{lin,r}$, left axis), while dashed lines denote the imaginary parts ($\\beta_\\text{lin,i}$, right axis); identical colors are used for the real and imaginary components of the same surface mode. In each panel of (a-c), $x\\in[-24,+24]$, $y\\in[-12,+12]$, $p_r=4$, $p_i=1$, $d=4.5$, $w=1.5$, and $\\gamma=-0.6$.\n\t\tIn (e) and (f), IP, OOP, and AS refer to in phase, out of phase, and antisymmetric, respectively.\n\t}\\label{fig1}\n\\end{figure*}\n\nBefore exploring the properties of the dissipative nonlinear surface states, it is crucial to first clarify the characteristics of their linear eigenvalues and the associated linear surface modes.\nIn the linear regime ($\\sigma=0$), the proposed optical lattice supports multiple linear modes distributed across different waveguides, including a localized gain or loss surface mode at the truncated interface (see Section \\textcolor{black}{S2}, Supporting Information).\nThe dependence of the surface-mode eigenvalues $\\beta_\\text{lin}=\\beta_\\text{lin,r}+i\\beta_\\text{lin,i}$ on the parameter $\\gamma$ is presented in Figs.~\\ref{fig1}(d-f).\nAs $\\gamma$ increases, both the real ($\\beta_\\text{lin,r}$) and imaginary ($\\beta_\\text{lin,i}$) parts of the eigenvalue gradually decrease, with $\\beta_\\text{lin,i}$ changing sign from positive to negative.\nThis behavior indicates the existence of a critical value $\\gamma_0$, such that $\\beta_\\text{lin,i}>0$ for $\\gamma<\\gamma_0$ and $\\beta_\\text{lin,i}<0$ for $\\gamma>\\gamma_0$, corresponding to linear loss and gain modes, respectively.\nNotably, as the number of waveguide arrays along the $y$-axis increases, the interface supports a greater number of surface modes, accompanied by the emergence of new mode families.\nA transversely truncated single-waveguide array supports a fundamental localized surface mode. Truncation of a two-waveguide array gives rise to both in-phase and out-of-phase surface modes, whereas truncation of a three-waveguide array additionally supports an antisymmetric mode (see Section \\textcolor{black}{S2}, Supporting Information).\nIn such structures, the eigenvalue of the in-phase mode typically exceeds that of its out-of-phase counterpart [Figs.~\\ref{fig1}(e-f)]. The eigenvalue of the newly emergent antisymmetric mode falls between these two, although the differences among all surface-mode eigenvalues are quantitatively small.\n\nNear $\\gamma_0=-0.657$, the linear surface-localized gain modes identified in Figs.~\\ref{fig1}(d-f) and Fig.~\\textcolor{black}{S1} provide the parent states for the nonlinear DSS families discussed below. The nonlinear branches are obtained by continuing these linear modes into the nonlinear regime, with the parent mode selected according to its spatial localization and phase symmetry. Thus, the fundamental DSS in the single truncated array bifurcates from the fundamental surface gain mode in Figs.~\\ref{fig1}(d) and \\textcolor{black}{S1}(a). The IP and OOP DSSs in the dual truncated arrays originate from the corresponding IP and OOP linear surface modes in Figs.~\\ref{fig1}(e) and \\textcolor{black}{S1}(c,d), whereas the IP, OOP and antisymmetric DSSs in the triple truncated arrays originate from the corresponding linear modes shown in Figs.~\\ref{fig1}(f) and \\textcolor{black}{S1}(e-g).\n\n\n\\begin{figure*}%[t]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\includegraphics[width=0.99\\columnwidth]{figure2.pdf}\n\t\\caption{(a) Power $U$ and (b) propagation constants $\\beta$ and effective width $w_\\text{eff}$ versus $\\gamma$ for dissipative surface solitons in a transversely truncated single-waveguide array. Dash-dotted lines in (a,b) mark $\\gamma_0=-0.657$, where $\\beta_i = 0$. Circles and arrows in (b) indicate which axis corresponds to each curve. (c,d) Representative field profiles $|\\phi|$ of dissipative surface solitons, marked by circles in (a), for (c) $\\gamma=-0.593$, $\\sigma=-1$, and (d) $\\gamma=-0.593$, $\\sigma=+1$. (e) Maximum instability growth rate $\\tau_\\text{r,m}$ versus $\\gamma$ for $\\sigma=+1$. (f) Linear stability spectrum of a stable dissipative surface soliton at $\\gamma=-0.593$ and $\\sigma=-1$. (g,h) Isosurface visualizations of field modulus $|\\phi|$ evolution along the propagation distance $z$, with $\\gamma=-0.593$, $\\sigma=-1$, $z\\in[0,3000]$ in (g) and $\\gamma=-0.593$, $\\sigma=+1$, $z\\in[0,1000]$ in (h). $x,y\\in [-24,+24]$ in (c,d), and $x,y\\in[-6,+6]$ in (g,h).}\\label{fig2}\n\\end{figure*}\n\\begin{figure*}%[b]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\includegraphics[width=0.99\\columnwidth]{figure3.pdf}\n\t\\caption{(a,b) Examples of field modulus profiles of in-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OOP) dissipative surface solitons supported by a transversely truncated double-waveguide array. (c,d) Corresponding top-view field profiles (upper panels) and phase distributions (lower panels) are also shown. The IP state has the same phase sign at the two dominant lobes, whereas the OOP state has opposite phase signs, indicating a $\\pi$-phase difference. Power $U$ (e), propagation constant $\\beta$ and effective width $w_\\text{eff}$ (f), and maximum instability growth rate $\\tau_\\text{r,m}$ (g) versus $\\gamma$ for in-phase and out-of-phase solitons. Dash-dotted lines in (e-g) denote $\\gamma$ values where $\\beta_i = 0$. Circles and arrows in (f) indicate which axis corresponds to each curve. (h) Isosurface visualization of the field modulus evolution for an unstable out-of-phase soliton. $\\gamma=-0.6$ in (a-d,h). $x,y\\in[-24,+24]$ in (a,b), and $x,y\\in [-8,+8]$ in (h). $\\sigma=-1$ in all panels.}\\label{fig3}\n\\end{figure*}\n\\begin{figure*}[h!]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\includegraphics[width=0.77\\columnwidth]{figure4.pdf}\n\t\\caption{Representative field modulus profiles (upper panels) and corresponding phase distributions (lower panels) of dissipative surface solitons in triple truncated arrays: (a) in-phase DSSs, (b) out-of-phase DSSs, and (c) antisymmetric DSSs. For triple truncated arrays, the state is classified as in-phase when adjacent lobes have the same phase sign along both $y=+d/2$ and $y=-d/2$, and as out-of-phase when adjacent lobes have opposite phase signs. (d) Power $U$, (e) propagation constant $\\beta$, (f) effective width $w_\\text{eff}$, and (g) maximum instability growth rate $\\tau_\\text{r,m}$ as functions of the parameter $\\gamma$ for the three DSS families. (h) Propagation dynamics of an unstable antisymmetric DSS, with (i) the corresponding phase distributions at selected propagation distances. (j) Propagation dynamics of an unstable out-of-phase DSS, with the corresponding field-modulus profiles in (k) and phase distributions in (l). $\\gamma=-0.6$ in (a-c), $\\gamma=-0.62$ in (h,i), $\\gamma=-0.65$ in (j-l), $x\\in[-24,+24]$ and $y\\in[-12,+12]$ in (a-c,i,k,l). $\\sigma=-1$ in all panels.} \\label{fig4}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\subsection{DSSs in a single truncated array}\nIn a transversely truncated single-waveguide array, both focusing and defocusing nonlinearities are examined, with quantitative results--including the existence and stability characteristics--summarized in Fig.~\\ref{fig2}.\n\nUnder focusing nonlinearity ($\\sigma=+1$), the fundamental dissipative surface soliton exists only within a finite interval $[\\gamma_{lc},\\gamma_{rc}]$.\nBoth the power $U$ and the propagation constant $\\beta$ increase monotonically with $\\gamma$ [Figs.~\\ref{fig2}(a,b)]. As $\\gamma$ approaches its lower cutoff $\\gamma_{lc}\\approx-0.663$, the slope of $U(\\gamma)$ becomes nearly vertical, whereas near the upper cutoff $\\gamma_{rc}\\approx-0.547$ the slope of $\\beta(\\gamma)$ similarly steepens. These behaviors collectively indicate the emergence of two sharply defined existence boundaries [Figs.~\\ref{fig2}(a,b)].\nNotably, these dissipative surface solitons arise purely from nonlinear effects, as indicated by the fact that their lower cutoff $\\gamma_{lc}<\\gamma_0$ and that their existence requires a finite power threshold.\n\nFor defocusing nonlinearity ($\\sigma=-1$), fundamental dissipative surface solitons likewise exist only within a range of $\\gamma$, yet their existence properties differ fundamentally from those of solitons in the focusing regime [also see Figs.~\\ref{fig2}(a,b)].\nThe power $U$ of dissipative solitons increases monotonically with $\\gamma$, whereas its propagation constant $\\beta$ decreases monotonically as $\\gamma$ increases.\nAs $\\gamma$ approaches the upper cutoff $\\gamma_{rc}$, the soliton's propagation constant asymptotically tends to zero. The lower cutoff $\\gamma_{lc}$ occurs near $\\gamma_0$, and as $\\gamma$ approaches this value, the power $U$ of fundamental dissipative surface soliton diminishes to zero. This characteristic indicates a bifurcation of the dissipative surface soliton from the linear gain surface mode.\n\nFigures~\\ref{fig2}(c,d) show the typical field modulus of fundamental dissipative surface solitons in the transversely truncated single‐waveguide array for $\\sigma=-1$ and $\\sigma=+1$, respectively. It can be observed that, for the same $\\gamma$, the surface soliton in the focusing nonlinear regime is significantly more localized than its defocusing counterpart.\nThe localization of the soliton is quantified by the inverse participation ratio $P\\equiv U^{-2}\\cdot\\left[\\iint |\\phi(x,y)|^4dxdy \\right]$, and the effective width is given by $w_\\text{eff}=P^{-1/2}$.\nAs seen in Fig.~\\ref{fig2}(b), for $\\sigma = +1$, the soliton becomes more localized with increasing $\\gamma$, whereas for $\\sigma = -1$, the soliton broadens as $\\gamma$ increases.\n\nThe instability growth rate of the solitons mentioned above is obtained by solving the linear eigenvalue equations (\\ref{eq6}) and (\\ref{eq7}). For $\\sigma=+1$, the dissipative surface solitons are predominantly unstable, except in a narrow region near the lower critical value, as shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig2}(e). In contrast, for $\\sigma = -1$, fundamental dissipative surface solitons remain stable in their entire existence domain. The spectrum of a representative stable dissipative soliton is shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig2}(f), where the real part of the maximum instability growth rate, $\\tau_{r,m}$, is less than or equal to 0.\n\nTo validate the linear stability analys of the fundamental dissipative solitons, we performed propagation simulations for all solitons using an input beam $\\Psi(x,y,z=0)=\\phi(x,y)[1+\\varrho(x,y)]$, where $\\phi(x,y)$ denotes the stationary fundamental soliton and $\\varrho(x,y)$ represents an added two-dimensional random perturbation.\nThe dynamical evolution of the dissipative solitons is fully consistent with the predictions of the linear stability analysis. Specifically, stable fundamental dissipative surface solitons preserve their profiles over long propagation distances, whereas unstable ones become distorted after only a short distance [Figs.~\\ref{fig2}(g,h), also see Section \\textcolor{black}{S3}, Supporting Information].\n\n\n\\subsection{DSSs in dual truncated arrays}\nAs the waveguide array extends in the $y$-direction, the family of dissipative surface solitons supported at the interface correspondingly expands. For displacement indices $k \\in \\{-1,0\\}$, the lattice forms a transversely truncated dual-waveguide array. In this optical lattice, both in-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OOP) dissipative surface solitons emerge along the $y$-direction [Figs.~\\ref{fig3}(a-d)]. The field-modulus profiles show that the in-phase dissipative surface soliton retains a finite amplitude at $y=-d/2$, in contrast to the out-of-phase soliton, which vanishes at this point. The phase distributions [$\\varphi=atan(\\phi_i/\\phi_r)$] reinforce this classification: matching phase peaks on either side of $y=-d/2$ correspond to an in-phase soliton, whereas opposite signs mark the out-of-phase state. These states can be viewed as composites of two fundamental dissipative surface solitons carrying different phases. In what follows, we focus on the defocusing regime ($\\sigma=-1$), where stable DSS families extend over broader parameter ranges and their stability properties can be resolved more clearly. We have also examined the focusing case ($\\sigma=+1$) for the double- and triple-row truncated lattices. Similar to the single-row array, only the in-phase DSSs display a very narrow stability window close to the left edge of their existence domain, whereas the other focusing DSSs are predominantly unstable. Moreover, these focusing states are also purely nonlinear modes, rather than nonlinear continuations of linear surface-localized gain or loss modes.\n\n\nThe existence and fundamental properties of the in-phase and out-of-phase dissipative surface solitons for $\\sigma=-1$ are shown in Figs.~\\ref{fig3}(e,f), revealing critical insights into the system's nonlinear dynamics.\nThe power $U$ of dissipative surface soliton are plotted as a function of the continuous control parameter $\\gamma$ [Fig.~\\ref{fig3}(e)]. Both IP (blue line) and OOP (red line) solitons demonstrate a monotonic increase in $U$ as $\\gamma$ approaches less negative values (i.e., moving towards $\\gamma \\approx -0.51$).\nAs $\\gamma$ asymptotically approaches $\\gamma_0=-0.657$, the power $U$ for both soliton families diminishes to zero, revealing their bifurcation from the associated linear gain modes. Near this point, the IP surface solitons exhibit slightly higher power than their OOP counterparts, a trend that mirrors the linear limit in which the eigenvalue of the IP surface mode lies slightly above that of the OOP mode. Moreover, the upper cutoff of the OOP surface solitons ($\\gamma_{rc}\\approx-0.554$) is lower than that of the IP solitons ($\\gamma_{rc}\\approx-0.518$), and both families exhibit a pronounced increase in power as they approach their respective upper cutoffs.\nBoth classes of localized dissipative surface solitons are strictly confined to the regime $\\gamma_0<\\gamma \\leq \\gamma_{rc}$.\nWithin this bounded interval, the control parameter $\\gamma$ sets the appropriate nonlinear strength needed to counteract dissipation and sustain a self-localized wave. We also observe that the propagation constants $\\beta$ of both types of solitons decrease monotonically as $\\gamma$ increases, accompanied by a monotonic broadening of their effective widths $w_\\text{eff}$ [Fig.~\\ref{fig3}(f)]. In the entire parameter range, the propagation constant $\\beta$ of the OOP surface soliton remains lower than that of the IP soliton, and the difference grows steadily with increasing nonlinear strength. Except in the vicinity of the upper cutoff, the IP surface soliton generally exhibits a larger width than the OOP soliton.\n\nWhile the fundamental dissipative surface solitons remain entirely stable for $\\sigma=-1$, their composite states with different phase relations display pronounced stability contrasts. The linear stability analysis indicates that OOP surface solitons are unstable in their existence domain, whereas IP surface solitons preserve stability over their full range [Fig.~\\ref{fig3}(g)].\nThis behavior can be physically understood by noting that the stability contrast arises because the nearly uniform phase of in-phase states enables the defocusing nonlinearity to generate balanced transverse forces along the $y$ direction. By contrast, out-of-phase states feature an almost $\\pi$ phase jump along $y$ direction, which introduces a strong local phase gradient and produces pronounced positive and negative power-flow peaks in the narrow region at $y=-d/2$. This sharp phase discontinuity produces a pronounced peak in the transverse power flow near the node, leading to strongly unbalanced repulsive forces and, consequently, intrinsic instability (see Section \\textcolor{black}{S4}, Supporting Information).\n\nDirect propagation simulations for dual truncated arrays show that, in the defocusing regime ($\\sigma=-1$), in-phase DSSs are dynamically robust, with their amplitude, power and localized profile remaining nearly unchanged up to long propagation distances. By contrast, out-of-phase DSSs undergo a transient relaxation in which the initial phase jump disappears, indicating their instability and eventual evolution into stable in-phase DSSs [Fig.~\\ref{fig3}(h), also see Section \\textcolor{black}{S5}, Supporting Information].\n\n\n\n\n\\subsection{DSSs in triple truncated arrays}\nWe also investigate the existence and dynamical stability of dissipative surface solitons supported by a triple truncated waveguide array with $k\\in \\{-1,0,+1\\}$. Representative stationary field modulus distributions for three different phase configurations: the in-phase (IP) state, the out-of-phase (OOP) state, and antisymmetric (AS) state, are shown in Figs.~\\ref{fig4}(a-c), respectively. In each panel, the upper row shows the field modulus $|\\phi|$, while the lower row depicts the corresponding phase $\\varphi$. These surface solitons are strongly localized near the truncated edge, with distinct internal phase structures.\n\nThe power $U$, propagation constant $\\beta$, and effective width $w_\\text{eff}$ of the three types of dissipative surface solitons are depicted as functions of the parameter $\\gamma$ in Figs.~\\ref{fig4}(d-f), respectively.\nAll three soliton families bifurcate from the linear limit at $\\gamma \\approx -0.657$, indicated by the vertical dashed line, and persist within overlapping but distinct existence domains.\nThe existence domains decrease successively from the in-phase soliton to the antisymmetric soliton and further to the out-of-phase soliton. Near the lower cutoff, the powers of the in-phase and out-of-phase surface solitons are comparable and are approximately $1.5$ times larger than that of the antisymmetric surface soliton [Fig.~\\ref{fig4}(d)]. In the linear regime, the eigenvalue of the in-phase mode exceeds that of the antisymmetric mode, which in turn is higher than that of the out-of-phase mode. This hierarchy is preserved in the nonlinear regime, where the corresponding propagation constants follow the same ordering [Fig.~\\ref{fig4}(e)].\nExcept in the vicinity of the upper cutoff, the in-phase dissipative solitons exhibit the largest width, while the antisymmetric solitons possess the smallest one. As the upper cutoff is approached, the slope of the $w_\\text{eff}(\\gamma)$ curve increases rapidly and tends toward a nearly vertical orientation [Fig.~\\ref{fig4}(f)].\n\nWithin this waveguide configuration, we likewise focus on the stability of the supported surface dissipative solitons. Linear stability analysis reveals that the in-phase surface dissipative solitons remain stable in their entire existence domain, whereas both the out-of-phase and antisymmetric surface solitons are unstable over the full parameter range [Fig.~\\ref{fig4}(g)].\nDirect propagation simulations show that unstable antisymmetric and out-of-phase surface solitons do not preserve their initial phase configurations, but typically evolve toward in-phase localized states during propagation [Figs~\\ref{fig4}(h-l)].\nThe underlying mechanism governing their dynamical stability closely resembles that of dissipative solitons in dual truncated arrays, and it further suggests that introducing a transverse phase translation along the $y$ direction in engineered waveguide arrays may enable the realization of stable out-of-phase solitons.\n\n\nFinally, to complement the stability analysis across all truncated geometries, we performed additional propagation simulations, as presented in Sections \\textcolor{black}{S6} and \\textcolor{black}{S7} of the Supporting Information. These results clarify the instability dynamics near the stability boundaries in different truncated waveguide arrays and demonstrate that stable dissipative surface solitons can be dynamically excited from weak Gaussian inputs close to the zero-intensity background.\n\n\\section{Conclusions}\\label{sec5}\nIn conclusion, we have elucidated the formation, bifurcation, and stability properties of dissipative surface solitons in truncated two-dimensional waveguide lattices with linear gain and loss. Surface-localized linear gain modes emerge within spectral gaps due to lattice truncation, and families of dissipative surface solitons are shown to bifurcate from these modes as nonlinearity is introduced, establishing a clear spectral origin of nonlinear surface localization in non-Hermitian lattices.\nThe stability of dissipative surface solitons is found to be strongly influenced by both the type of nonlinearity and the phase configuration. While focusing nonlinearity generally destabilizes fundamental surface solitons, defocusing nonlinearity robustly supports stable dissipative surface localization over broad parameter ranges. In multi-row truncated lattices, although multiple families of dissipative surface solitons with different phase relations may coexist, their dynamical stability exhibits pronounced phase selectivity: only in-phase surface solitons remain stable, whereas out-of-phase and antisymmetric states undergo spontaneous symmetry restoration and evolve into stable in-phase configurations.\n\n\n\n\n%%-----------------------------------------------\n\\section*{Supporting Information}\nSupporting Information is available from the Online.\n\n\n\\section*{Acknowledgements}\nThis work was supported by the Applied Basic Research Program of Shanxi Province (202303021211191, 202303021212274), National Natural Science Foundation of China (62575264, 12404385), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (BX20230218, 2024M751950).\n\n\n\\appendix\n\\nocite{*}\n% \\bibliographystyle{elsarticle-harv}\n\\bibliographystyle{elsarticle-num}\n% \\bibliographystyle{unsrt}\n%\\bibliography{csfref20260324}% Produces the bibliography via BibTeX.\n\n\\begin{thebibliography}{10}\n\t\\expandafter\\ifx\\csname url\\endcsname\\relax\n\t\\def\\url#1{\\texttt{#1}}\\fi\n\t\\expandafter\\ifx\\csname urlprefix\\endcsname\\relax\\def\\urlprefix{URL }\\fi\n\t\\expandafter\\ifx\\csname href\\endcsname\\relax\n\t\\def\\href#1#2{#2} \\def\\path#1{#1}\\fi\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{belashov2005solitary}\n\tV.~Y. Belashov, S.~V. Vladimirov, Solitary Waves in Dispersive Complex Media:\n\tTheory{\\textperiodcentered} Simulation{\\textperiodcentered} Applications,\n\tSpringer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Purwins2010}\n\tH.-G. Purwins, H.~B\\\"{o}deker, S.~Amiranashvili, Dissipative solitons, Adv.\n\tPhys. 59~(5) (2010) 485–701.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Grelu2012}\n\tP.~Grelu, N.~Akhmediev, Dissipative solitons for mode-locked lasers, Nat.\n\tPhotonics 6~(2) (2012) 84–92.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Peng2018}\n\tJ.~Peng, H.~Zeng, Build-up of dissipative optical soliton molecules via diverse\n\tsoliton interactions, Laser Photonics Rev. 12~(8) (2018) 1800009.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Rosanov2026}\n\tN.~N. Rosanov, S.~V. Fedorov, N.~A. Veretenov, Dissipative optical solitons:\n\tFrom scalar 1d- to 2d- and 3d-, topological and vector solitons, Phys. Rep.\n\t1162 (2026) 1–60.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Guo2016}\n\tH.~Guo, M.~Karpov, E.~Lucas, A.~Kordts, M.~Pfeiffer, V.~Brasch, G.~Lihachev,\n\tV.~Lobanov, M.~Gorodetsky, T.~Kippenberg, Universal dynamics and\n\tdeterministic switching of dissipative kerr solitons in optical\n\tmicroresonators, Nat. Phys. 13~(1) (2016) 94–102.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{malomed2022multidimensionalCSF}\n\tB.~A. Malomed, Multidimensional dissipative solitons and solitary vortices,\n\tChaos, Solitons Fractals 163 (2022) 112526.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Aranson2002}\n\tI.~S. Aranson, L.~Kramer, The world of the complex ginzburg-landau equation,\n\tRev. Mod. Phys. 74~(1) (2002) 99–143.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{ankiewicz2008dissipative}\n\tA.~Ankiewicz, N.~Akhmediev, Dissipative solitons: from optics to biology and\n\tmedicine, Springer, 2008.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{skarka2006stability}\n\tV.~Skarka, N.~Aleksi{\\'c}, Stability criterion for dissipative soliton\n\tsolutions of the one-, two-, and three-dimensional complex cubic-quintic\n\tginzburg-landau equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96~(1) (2006) 013903.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{rosanov2002spatial}\n\tN.~N. Rosanov, Spatial hysteresis and optical patterns, Springer Science \\&\n\tBusiness Media, 2002.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{rosanov2005curvilinear}\n\tN.~N. Rosanov, S.~V. Fedorov, A.~N. Shatsev, Curvilinear motion of multivortex\n\tlaser-soliton complexes with strong and weak coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.\n\t95~(5) (2005) 053903.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{veretenov2016rotating}\n\tN.~Veretenov, N.~Rosanov, S.~Fedorov, Rotating and precessing\n\tdissipative-optical-topological-3d solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117~(18) (2016)\n\t183901.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Veretenov2017}\n\tN.~Veretenov, S.~Fedorov, N.~Rosanov, Topological vortex and knotted\n\tdissipative optical 3d solitons generated by 2d vortex solitons, Phys. Rev.\n\tLett. 119~(26) (2017) 263901.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Hung2017}\n\tN.~V. Hung, K.~Zegadlo, A.~Ramaniuk, V.~V. Konotop, M.~Trippenbach,\n\tModulational instability of coupled ring waveguides with linear gain and\n\tnonlinear loss, Sci. Rep. 7~(1) (2017) 4089.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Perego2018}\n\tA.~M. Perego, S.~K. Turitsyn, K.~Staliunas, Gain through losses in nonlinear\n\toptics, Light: Sci. Appl. 7~(1) (2018) 43.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Pernet2022}\n\tN.~Pernet, P.~St-Jean, D.~D. Solnyshkov, G.~Malpuech, N.~Carlon~Zambon,\n\tQ.~Fontaine, B.~Real, O.~Jamadi, A.~Lemaître, M.~Morassi, L.~Le~Gratiet,\n\tT.~Baptiste, A.~Harouri, I.~Sagnes, A.~Amo, S.~Ravets, J.~Bloch, Gap solitons\n\tin a one-dimensional driven-dissipative topological lattice, Nat. Phys.\n\t18~(6) (2022) 678–684.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{BlancoRedondo2023}\n\tA.~Blanco-Redondo, C.~M. de~Sterke, C.~Xu, S.~Wabnitz, S.~K. Turitsyn, The\n\tbright prospects of optical solitons after 50 years, Nat. Photonics 17~(11)\n\t(2023) 937–942.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Yan2025lpr}\n\tW.~Yan, R.~Chen, W.~Liu, Y.~Tan, Y.~Kivshar, F.~Chen, Tunable edge states and\n\ttopological solitons in non-hermitian photonic lattices, Laser Photonics Rev.\n\t19~(15) (2025) 2402126.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{malomed1997stability}\n\tB.~A. Malomed, M.~G{\\\"o}lles, I.~M. Uzunov, F.~Lederer, Stability and\n\tinteractions of pulses in simplified ginzburg-landau equations, Phys. Scr.\n\t55~(1) (1997) 73.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{kartashov2010dissipativeOL}\n\tY.~V. Kartashov, V.~V. Konotop, V.~A. Vysloukh, L.~Torner, Dissipative defect\n\tmodes in periodic structures, Opt. Lett. 35~(10) (2010) 1638--1640.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{kartashov2011symmetryPRA}\n\tY.~V. Kartashov, V.~V. Konotop, V.~A. Vysloukh, Symmetry breaking and\n\tmultipeaked solitons in inhomogeneous gain landscapes, Phys. Rev. A 83~(4)\n\t(2011) 041806.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{huang2020dissipativeOE}\n\tC.~Huang, C.~Li, L.~Dong, Dissipative solitons supported by transversal\n\tsingle-or three-channel amplifying chirped lattices, Opt. Express 28~(14)\n\t(2020) 21134--21142.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{kartashov2010vortexOL}\n\tY.~V. Kartashov, V.~V. Konotop, V.~A. Vysloukh, L.~Torner, Vortex lattice\n\tsolitons supported by localized gain, Opt. Lett. 35~(19) (2010) 3177--3179.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{borovkova2011rotatingOL}\n\tO.~V. Borovkova, V.~E. Lobanov, Y.~V. Kartashov, L.~Torner, Rotating vortex\n\tsolitons supported by localized gain, Opt. Lett. 36~(10) (2011) 1936--1938.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Huang2025CSF}\n\tC.~Huang, Q.~Fu, L.~Ma, Stable high-charge vortex dissipative solitons in\n\tazimuthally modulated waveguide arrays with localized gain, Chaos, Solitons\n\tFractals 201 (2025) 117314.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{veretenov2016rotatingPRL}\n\tN.~Veretenov, N.~Rosanov, S.~Fedorov, Rotating and precessing\n\tdissipative-optical-topological-3d solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117~(18) (2016)\n\t183901.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{musslimani2008opticalPRL}\n\tZ.~H. Musslimani, K.~G. Makris, R.~El-Ganainy, D.~N. Christodoulides, Optical\n\tsolitons in \\text{PT} periodic potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100~(3) (2008)\n\t030402.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{konotop2016nonlinearRMP}\n\tV.~V. Konotop, J.~Yang, D.~A. Zezyulin, Nonlinear waves in \\text{PT}-symmetric\n\tsystems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88~(3) (2016) 035002.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{suchkovnonlinearLPR2016}\n\tS.~V. Suchkov, A.~A. Sukhorukov, J.~Huang, S.~V. Dmitriev, C.~Lee, Y.~S.\n\tKivshar, Nonlinear switching and solitons in \\text{PT}-symmetric photonic\n\tsystems, Laser Photonics Rev. 10~(2) (2016) 177--213.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{kartashov2015topologicalPRL}\n\tY.~V. Kartashov, V.~V. Konotop, L.~Torner, Topological states in\n\tpartially-\\text{PT}-symmetric azimuthal potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115~(19)\n\t(2015) 193902.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{kartashov2006surfacePRL}\n\tY.~V. Kartashov, V.~A. Vysloukh, L.~Torner, Surface gap solitons, Phys. Rev.\n\tLett. 96~(7) (2006) 073901.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Smirnova2020}\n\tD.~Smirnova, D.~Leykam, Y.~Chong, Y.~Kivshar, Nonlinear topological photonics,\n\tAppl. Phys. Rev. 7~(2) (2020).\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Ivanov2021}\n\tS.~K. Ivanov, Y.~V. Kartashov, A.~Szameit, L.~Torner, V.~V. Konotop, Floquet\n\tedge multicolor solitons, Laser Photonics Rev. 16~(3) (2022) 2100398.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Tang2022}\n\tG.-J. Tang, X.-T. He, F.-L. Shi, J.-W. Liu, X.-D. Chen, J.-W. Dong, Topological\n\tphotonic crystals: physics, designs, and applications, Laser Photonics Rev.\n\t16~(4) (2022) 2100300.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{kartashov2010dissipativeEPL}\n\tY.~V. Kartashov, V.~V. Konotop, V.~A. Vysloukh, Dissipative surface solitons in\n\tperiodic structures, Europhys. Lett. 91~(3) (2010) 34003.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{he2012stableOL}\n\tY.~He, D.~Mihalache, X.~Zhu, L.~Guo, Y.~V. Kartashov, Stable surface solitons\n\tin truncated complex potentials, Opt. Lett. 37~(13) (2012) 2526--2528.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{huang2019dissipative}\n\tC.~Huang, L.~Dong, Dissipative surface solitons in a nonlinear fractional\n\tschr{\\\"o}dinger equation, Opt. Lett. 44~(22) (2019) 5438--5441.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{kartashov2019edgeOL}\n\tY.~V. Kartashov, V.~A. Vysloukh, Edge and bulk dissipative solitons in\n\tmodulated \\text{PT}-symmetric waveguide arrays, Opt. Lett. 44~(4) (2019)\n\t791--794.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{kartashov2011twoOL}\n\tY.~V. Kartashov, V.~V. Konotop, V.~A. Vysloukh, Two-dimensional dissipative\n\tsolitons supported by localized gain, Opt. Lett. 36~(1) (2011) 82--84.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{lobanov2010stableOL}\n\tV.~E. Lobanov, Y.~V. Kartashov, V.~A. Vysloukh, L.~Torner, Stable radially\n\tsymmetric and azimuthally modulated vortex solitons supported by localized\n\tgain, Opt. Lett. 36~(1) (2010) 85--87.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{li2024stablePRL}\n\tC.~Li, Y.~V. Kartashov, Stable vortex solitons sustained by localized gain in a\n\tcubic medium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132~(21) (2024) 213802.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Mihalache2008PRE}\n\tD.~Mihalache, D.~Mazilu, F.~Lederer, Y.~S. Kivshar, Spatiotemporal dissipative\n\tsolitons in two-dimensional photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. E 78~(5) (Nov.\n\t2008).\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{zezyulin2023continuousOL}\n\tD.~A. Zezyulin, Continuous families of non-hermitian surface solitons, Opt.\n\tLett. 48~(18) (2023) 4773--4776.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{shen2025edgeFOP}\n\tS.~Shen, M.~R. Beli{\\'c}, Y.~Zhang, Y.~Li, T.~Wang, Z.-N. Tian, Q.-D. Chen,\n\tEdge solitons in non-hermitian photonic lattices with type-ii dirac cones,\n\tFront. Phys. 20~(4) (2025) 042203.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{guo2009observation}\n\tA.~Guo, G.~J. Salamo, D.~Duchesne, R.~Morandotti, M.~Volatier-Ravat, V.~Aimez,\n\tG.~A. Siviloglou, D.~N. Christodoulides, Observation of \\text{PT}-symmetry\n\tbreaking in complex optical potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett 103~(9) (2009)\n\t093902.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{dolgaleva2011compact}\n\tK.~Dolgaleva, W.~C. Ng, L.~Qian, J.~S. Aitchison, Compact highly-nonlinear\n\t\\text{AlGaAs} waveguides for efficient wavelength conversion, Opt. Express\n\t19~(13) (2011) 12440--12455.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{el2018nonNP}\n\tR.~El-Ganainy, K.~G. Makris, M.~Khajavikhan, Z.~H. Musslimani, S.~Rotter, D.~N.\n\tChristodoulides, Non-hermitian physics and \\text{PT} symmetry, Nat. Phys.\n\t14~(1) (2018) 11--19.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{streltsov2002study}\n\tA.~M. Streltsov, N.~F. Borrelli, Study of femtosecond-laser-written waveguides\n\tin glasses, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19~(10) (2002) 2496--2504.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{szameit2010discrete}\n\tA.~Szameit, S.~Nolte, Discrete optics in femtosecond-laser-written photonic\n\tstructures, J. Phys. B:At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 43~(16) (2010) 163001.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{ruter2010observation}\n\tC.~E. R{\\\"u}ter, K.~G. Makris, R.~El-Ganainy, D.~N. Christodoulides, M.~Segev,\n\tD.~Kip, Observation of parity--time symmetry in optics, Nat. Phys. 6~(3)\n\t(2010) 192--195.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{belitsch2022gain}\n\tM.~Belitsch, D.~N. Dirin, M.~V. Kovalenko, K.~Pichler, S.~Rotter, A.~Ghalgaoui,\n\tH.~Ditlbacher, A.~Hohenau, J.~R. Krenn, Gain and lasing from cdse\\/cds\n\tnanoplatelet stripe waveguides, Micro Nano Eng. 17 (2022) 100167.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{bandres2018topological}\n\tM.~A. Bandres, S.~Wittek, G.~Harari, M.~Parto, J.~Ren, M.~Segev, D.~N.\n\tChristodoulides, M.~Khajavikhan, Topological insulator laser: Experiments,\n\tScience 359~(6381) (2018) eaar4005.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{el2019dawn}\n\tR.~El-Ganainy, M.~Khajavikhan, D.~N. Christodoulides, S.~K. Ozdemir, The dawn\n\tof non-hermitian optics, Commun. Phys. 2~(1) (2019) 37.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{ashida2020non}\n\tY.~Ashida, Z.~Gong, M.~Ueda, Non-hermitian physics, Adv. Phys. 69~(3) (2020)\n\t249--435.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{zezyulin2011solitonsOL}\n\tD.~A. Zezyulin, Y.~V. Kartashov, V.~V. Konotop, Solitons in a medium with\n\tlinear dissipation and localized gain, Opt. Lett. 36~(7) (2011) 1200--1202.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{wimmer2015observationNC}\n\tM.~Wimmer, A.~Regensburger, M.-A. Miri, C.~Bersch, D.~N. Christodoulides,\n\tU.~Peschel, Observation of optical solitons in pt-symmetric lattices, Nat.\n\tCommun. 6~(1) (2015) 7782.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{deconinck2006computing}\n\tB.~Deconinck, J.~N. Kutz, Computing spectra of linear operators using the\n\tfloquet-fourier-hill method, J. Comput. Phys. 219~(1) (2006) 296--321.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{yang2010nonlinear}\n\tJ.~Yang, Nonlinear waves in integrable and nonintegrable systems, SIAM, 2010.\n\t\n\t\\bibitem{Kang2023}\n\tJ.~Kang, Q.~Zhang, R.~Wei, J.~Qiu, Z.~Yang, G.~Dong, Tunable localization of\n\thigher-order bound states in non-hermitian optical waveguide lattices, Laser\n\tPhotonics Rev. 17~(12) (2023) 2300558.\n\t\n\\end{thebibliography}\n\n\n\\end{document}\n%\n% ****** End of file apssamp.tex ******\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091173,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31973"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31973"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Tugba Erpek"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Yalin E. Sagduyu, Tugba Erpek, Aylin Yener, Sennur Ulukus"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Semantic Leakage and Privacy Preservation in Relay-Assisted Semantic Communications"},"comments":{"kind":"null"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.NI cs.CR cs.IT cs.LG eess.SP math.IT"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Semantic communication (SemCom) has emerged as a promising paradigm in which the transmission of task-relevant information is prioritized over raw data, enabling efficient and robust communication under resource and channel constraints. In this paper, the privacy implications of relay-assisted SemCom systems are studied, where the intermediate relay node operates directly on learned latent representations. It is shown that the relay, even without access to source data, can reliably infer semantic meaning and reconstruct signals with performance comparable to that of the legitimate receiver, revealing a fundamental privacy vulnerability of semantic representations. To address this issue, an iterative adversarial training framework is proposed in which a strong, adaptively trained eavesdropper at the relay is explicitly accounted for. The proposed approach alternates between optimizing the relay's eavesdropping function and the legitimate system, resulting in representations that preserve semantic decoding performance at the intended receiver while degrading semantic inference at the relay. The semantic accuracy gap between the legitimate receiver and the eavesdropper is significantly enlarged across channel conditions. Importantly, this protection is achieved in a stealthy manner, with high reconstruction fidelity maintained while semantic leakage is selectively suppressed."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:15:23 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:15:23 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Sagduyu","Yalin E.",""],["Erpek","Tugba",""],["Yener","Aylin",""],["Ulukus","Sennur",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Sagduyu\",\n \"Yalin E.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Erpek\",\n \"Tugba\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Yener\",\n \"Aylin\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Ulukus\",\n \"Sennur\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: arxiv.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[journal]{IEEEtran}\n\n\\bstctlcite{IEEEexample:BSTcontrol}\n\n\\usepackage{epsfig,rotating,setspace,latexsym,amsmath,epsf,amssymb,amsfonts,bm,theorem,cite,authblk, bbm,color, hyperref, multirow, caption, graphicx, subcaption, url, xcolor}\n\n\\captionsetup{size=footnotesize,\n skip=5pt, position = bottom}\n\n\\IEEEoverridecommandlockouts\n\\allowdisplaybreaks\n\n\\newcommand\\rev[1]{\\textcolor{red}{#1}}\n\n\n\\topmargin=-0.66in \n \\oddsidemargin -0.35in \\textwidth=7.2in\n \\textheight=9.2in \n\n\\title{Semantic Leakage and Privacy Preservation in Relay-Assisted Semantic Communications}\n\n\n\\author[1]{Yalin E. Sagduyu}\n\\author[1]{Tugba Erpek}\n\\author[2]{Aylin Yener}\n\\author[3]{Sennur Ulukus}\n\n\\affil[1]{\\normalsize Nexcepta, Gaithersburg, MD, USA}\n\\affil[2]{\\normalsize The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA}\n\\affil[3]{\\normalsize University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\\bstctlcite{BSTcontrol}\n\n\\pagestyle{empty}\n\\maketitle\n\\thispagestyle{empty}\n\n\\begin{abstract}\nSemantic communication (SemCom) has emerged as a promising paradigm in which the transmission of task-relevant information is prioritized over raw data, enabling efficient and robust communication under resource and channel constraints. In this paper, the privacy implications of relay-assisted SemCom systems are studied, where the intermediate relay node operates directly on learned latent representations. It is shown that the relay, even without access to source data, can reliably infer semantic meaning and reconstruct signals with performance comparable to that of the legitimate receiver, revealing a fundamental privacy vulnerability of semantic representations. To address this issue, an iterative adversarial training framework is proposed in which a strong, adaptively trained eavesdropper at the relay is explicitly accounted for. The proposed approach alternates between optimizing the relay's eavesdropping function and the legitimate system, resulting in representations that preserve semantic decoding performance at the intended receiver while degrading semantic inference at the relay. The semantic accuracy gap between the legitimate receiver and the eavesdropper is significantly enlarged across channel conditions. Importantly, this protection is achieved in a stealthy manner, with high reconstruction fidelity maintained while semantic leakage is selectively suppressed.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\\begin{IEEEkeywords}\nSemantic communications, semantic relaying, deep learning, untrusted relay, eavesdropping, privacy.\n\\end{IEEEkeywords}\n\n\\section{Introduction}\n\nConventional communication systems are designed to reliably transmit bits, whereas \\emph{semantic communication} (SemCom) shifts the focus toward conveying task-relevant meaning \\cite{guler2014, gunduz2022beyond}. By leveraging deep neural networks (DNNs) to encode and decode semantic representations, such systems can significantly improve robustness, compression efficiency, and adaptability to varying channel conditions \\cite{huang2022toward, xie2021deep, sagduyu2024will}. \n\n\\emph{Relay-assisted communication} is essential to extend coverage, improve reliability, and overcome limitations of direct links between the source-destination pairs. Integrating relays into SemCom systems is therefore a natural extension, enabling cooperative transmission of learned representations \\cite{lin2024semantic, arda2024semantic, guo2024distributed, luo2022autoencoder}. When applied to SemCom, relays can operate directly on latent representations rather than decoded signals, allowing for flexible and efficient forwarding strategies.\n\nHowever, this architectural shift introduces a critical and largely unexplored \\emph{privacy challenge}. Unlike conventional relays that forward encoded bits without semantic interpretation, semantic relays inherently process representations that embed high-level information. As a result, an \\emph{untrusted relay} can act as an intelligent eavesdropper, capable of learning and inferring semantic meaning directly from the observed signals. Controlling this semantic leakage at intermediate nodes is a key challenge for SemCom.\n\nSecurity and privacy in SemCom have emerged as critical research directions, as the shift from bit-level transmission to representation-level encoding fundamentally changes the attack surface \\cite{sagduyu2023semantic, sagduyu2023task, yang2024secure}. Unlike conventional systems, where confidentiality is enforced through bit-level encryption, SemCom embeds high-level information directly into transmitted representations, making them inherently vulnerable to inference attacks. Privacy-preserving methods based on adversarial perturbations, representation obfuscation, and multi-task learning have been investigated \\cite{liu2023semprotector, luo2023encrypted, wang2024privacy}. However, these methods focus on point-to-point settings and do not consider intermediate nodes. In relay-assisted systems, the relay observes a highly informative latent representation and can act as a powerful, learnable eavesdropper, exposing major privacy threats.\n\nFig.~\\ref{fig:semrelayprivacy} illustrates relay-assisted SemCom, where cooperative relaying improves semantic delivery while an untrusted relay introduces semantic privacy vulnerabilities. In this paper, we study privacy preservation in relay-assisted SemCom, where the relay is modeled as a strong, learnable eavesdropper operating on latent representations. We first show that the relay effectively infers semantic meaning from its observations, revealing a significant privacy risk. Specifically, the relay can be trained to achieve semantic classification and reconstruction performance comparable to that of the legitimate receiver, even under compressed representations. This reveals a key SemCom vulnerability where robustness to channel impairments facilitates \\emph{semantic leakage}.\n\nConventional physical-layer security methods such as transmit power control and source-side artificial noise injection have fundamental limitations in relay-assisted SemCom because the relay observes a stronger first-hop semantic representation than the destination and can therefore still reliably infer semantic information. To address the privacy challenge introduced by the untrusted relay, we propose an iterative \\emph{adversarial training} framework that explicitly models the relay as an adaptive eavesdropper. The idea is to alternate between training the eavesdropper to maximize its inference capability and training the legitimate system to degrade the eavesdropper's performance while preserving its own utility. This leads to a selectively informative representation that preserves semantic accuracy at the intended receiver while degrading semantic separability at the relay. The resulting protection is inherently stealthy, suppressing semantic leakage without introducing noticeable degradation in reconstruction fidelity. \n\nThe remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Sec.~\\ref{sec:semcomprivacy} presents the relay-assisted SemCom design and its privacy vulnerability. Sec.~\\ref{sec:iterative} introduces the iterative adversarial framework for privacy protection. Sec.~\\ref{sec:conclusion} concludes the paper.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/semrelayprivacy.pdf}\n \\caption{Relay-assisted SemCom with privacy vulnerability and protection.}\n \\label{fig:semrelayprivacy}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\section{Semantic Communications with an Eavesdropping Relay \\label{sec:semcomprivacy}}\n\n\\subsection{Relay-Assisted Semantic Communication System Model}\n\nWe consider a relay-assisted SemCom system with a source communicating with a destination through the assistance of a relay, as shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:semrelaycom}. Let $\\mathbf{s}$ denote the input data sample, i.e., an image with pixel values normalized to $[0,1]$, with $C$ channels, height $H$, and width $W$. For the CIFAR-10 dataset considered here, $C \\!=\\! 3$, $H \\!=\\! 32$, and $W \\!=\\!32$. Let $l$ denote the associated semantic label. There are $L = 10$ classes for CIFAR-10. The transmitter maps the input sample $\\mathbf{s}$ into a complex-valued transmitted latent signal $\\mathbf{x}$ of length $N$, where $N$ denotes the number of complex channel uses and controls the semantic bandwidth/compression ratio. In implementation, this signal is represented using a real-valued tensor with two channels and length $N$, corresponding to its in-phase and quadrature components, which together form the equivalent complex-valued representation.\n\nThe input sample $\\mathbf{s}$ is processed by the encoder DNN (parameterized by $\\theta_A$) as $f_{\\theta_A}(\\mathbf{s})$. The output signal $\\mathbf{x}$ is normalized per sample to satisfy a unit average transmit power constraint. The encoder $f_{\\theta_A}$ is a convolutional neural network that extracts hierarchical spatial features and compresses them into a latent representation using two convolutional stages. The first stage applies two $3\\times3$ convolutions mapping $C \\rightarrow 64 \\rightarrow 64$, each followed by batch normalization and ReLU, then a $2\\times2$ max-pooling layer (stride 2) and dropout with probability $0.25$. The second stage applies two $3\\times3$ convolutions mapping $64 \\rightarrow 128 \\rightarrow 128$, again followed by batch normalization and ReLU, then a $2\\times2$ max-pooling layer (stride 2) and dropout with probability $0.25$. The resulting feature tensor has size $128 \\times (H/4) \\times (W/4)$ (for CIFAR-10: $128 \\times 8 \\times 8$), which is flattened and passed through fully connected layers $128(H/4)(W/4) \\rightarrow 1024 \\rightarrow 2N$ with ReLU activation. The output is reshaped into a two-channel signal representing the real and imaginary parts of $\\mathbf{x}$; for $N=256$, this corresponds to 512 real-valued components.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/relay_sem_com_eve.pdf}\n \\caption{System model of semantic relay communications.}\\label{fig:semrelaycom}\n\\end{figure}\n\nThe wireless channel is modeled as block Rayleigh fading with additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN). For any transmitted signal $\\mathbf{x}$, the received signal is given by $\\mathbf{y} = h \\mathbf{x} + \\mathbf{n}$, where the channel coefficient $h$ is a complex scalar that remains constant across the $N$ symbols of a given sample, $\\mathbf{n}$ denotes the noise, and $\\mathbf{y}$, $\\mathbf{x}$, and $\\mathbf{n}$ are complex-valued signals of length $N$. \n\nIn relay-assisted operation, communication proceeds in two phases.\n\\begin{enumerate}\n\\item\nIn the first phase, the source transmits $\\mathbf{x}$, and the destination and relay receive signals $\\mathbf{y}_D^{(1)}$ and $\\mathbf{y}_R^{(1)}$, respectively.\n\n\\item\nIn the second phase, the relay processes $\\mathbf{y}_R^{(1)}$ through the mapping $g_{\\theta_R}(\\cdot)$ and transmits $\\mathbf{x}_R$, and the destination receives the second-phase signal $\\mathbf{y}_D^{(2)}$. The destination then forms the joint observation $\\mathbf{y}_D$ by concatenating $\\mathbf{y}_D^{(1)}$ and $\\mathbf{y}_D^{(2)}$, resulting in a representation whose dimension is twice that of each individual phase observation.\n\\end{enumerate}\n\nThe relay mapping $g_{\\theta_R}$ maps a latent signal to another one of the same length without reconstructing the input sequence. The relay is implemented as a one-dimensional convolutional residual network that preserves the sequential structure of the signal-level latent representation. The input is treated as a two-channel sequence of length $N$, and an initial 1D convolution (kernel size 3, padding 1) maps 2 channels to 128 channels. Two residual blocks follow, each consisting of two 1D convolutional layers (kernel size 3, padding 1, 128 channels) with ReLU activations and identity skip connections. A final 1D convolution (kernel size 3, padding 1) maps the representation back to 2 channels. The relay output is normalized per sample to satisfy the transmit power constraint.\n\nAt the receiver, the destination applies two decoders to the joint observation $\\mathbf{y}_D$. The reconstruction decoder $d_{\\theta_D}^{\\mathrm{rec}}$ maps the received signal to a reconstructed image $\\hat{\\mathbf{s}}$. Internally, the input is represented in real form and flattened to dimension $4N$, then passed through fully connected layers $4N \\rightarrow 1024 \\rightarrow 256(H/4)(W/4)$. The output is reshaped into a tensor of size $256 \\times (H/4) \\times (W/4)$, followed by two transposed convolution layers with kernel size 4, stride 2, and padding 1, mapping $256 \\rightarrow 128 \\rightarrow 64$ channels, each followed by batch normalization and ReLU. A final $3\\times 3$ convolution maps 64 channels to $C$, and a sigmoid activation produces $\\hat{\\mathbf{s}}$. The classification decoder $d_{\\theta_D}^{\\mathrm{cls}}$ maps the same input to semantic prediction logits $\\mathbf{z}_D$ over $L$ classes. It consists of fully connected layers $4N \\rightarrow 512 \\rightarrow 256 \\rightarrow L$, with ReLU activations and dropout with probability $0.5$ after the first two layers. The predicted label $\\hat{l}_D$ corresponds to the class associated with the maximum component of $\\mathbf{z}_D$.\n\n\\subsection{Training of Legitimate SemCom Relay System}\n\nSemCom is trained in two stages. In Stage 1, the parameters $(\\theta_A, \\theta_R, \\theta_D^{\\mathrm{rec}}, \\theta_D^{\\mathrm{cls}})$ are jointly optimized using a weighted objective that combines reconstruction fidelity and semantic classification performance. The overall loss consists of four terms weighted by $\\lambda_{\\mathrm{rec}}$, $\\lambda_{\\mathrm{ssim}}$, $\\lambda_{\\mathrm{psnr}}$, and $\\lambda_{\\mathrm{ce}}$.\n\n\\begin{enumerate}\n\\item The first term is the mean squared error (MSE), denoted as $\\mathrm{MSE}(\\hat{\\mathbf{s}}, \\mathbf{s})$, which measures the average squared difference between the reconstructed sample $\\hat{\\mathbf{s}}$ and the original sample $\\mathbf{s}$ over all image elements. Lower MSE indicates improved reconstruction fidelity.\n\n\\item The second term is the structural similarity index, denoted as $\\mathrm{SSIM}(\\hat{\\mathbf{s}}, \\mathbf{s})$, which evaluates perceptual similarity between $\\hat{\\mathbf{s}}$ and $\\mathbf{s}$ by comparing their luminance, contrast, and structural consistency. Since higher SSIM values correspond to better perceptual similarity, the optimization minimizes $1-\\mathrm{SSIM}(\\hat{\\mathbf{s}}, \\mathbf{s})$.\n\n\\item The third term is the peak signal-to-noise ratio, denoted as $\\mathrm{PSNR}(\\hat{\\mathbf{s}}, \\mathbf{s})$, which measures reconstruction quality in decibels based on the reconstruction error. Larger PSNR indicates improved reconstruction quality. The optimization objective therefore encourages higher PSNR values during training.\n\n\\item The fourth term is the categorical cross-entropy loss, denoted as $\\mathcal{L}_{\\mathrm{CE}}(\\mathbf{z}_D,l)$, where $\\mathbf{z}_D$ represents the semantic prediction logits at the destination and $l$ denotes the ground-truth semantic label. This term measures the semantic classification error and encourages accurate semantic inference at the receiver.\n\\end{enumerate}\nFor performance evaluation, weights for loss terms are selected as $\\lambda_{\\mathrm{rec}} = 5$, $\\lambda_{\\mathrm{ssim}} = 2$, $\\lambda_{\\mathrm{psnr}} = 1$, and $\\lambda_{\\mathrm{ce}} = 1$.\nThe MSE term enforces pixel-wise fidelity and stabilizes optimization, while the PSNR term introduces a logarithmic sensitivity to reconstruction error that emphasizes improvements in high-fidelity regimes. The SSIM term further promotes structural consistency in the reconstructed images.\n\n\\subsection{Eavesdropping Relay Model}\nThe relay simultaneously acts as a forwarding node for cooperative communication and as an untrusted eavesdropper that attempts semantic inference from its received observation. In Stage 2 of SemCom training, the legitimate system is frozen. The first-phase relay observation, denoted by $\\mathbf{y}_R^{(1)}$, is a complex-valued signal of length $N$. This observation serves as the input $\\mathbf{y}_E$ to the relay’s eavesdropping function and is processed through the relay’s reconstruction and classification decoders for semantic eavesdropping, as shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:semrelaycom}. The reconstruction decoder $d_{\\theta_E}^{\\mathrm{rec}}$ follows the same architectural structure as the destination's reconstruction decoder but operates on a latent signal of length $N$. The classification decoder $d_{\\theta_E}^{\\mathrm{cls}}$ produces semantic prediction logits $\\mathbf{z}_E$ over the $L$ classes using fully connected layers of dimensions $2N \\rightarrow 512 \\rightarrow 256 \\rightarrow L$, with ReLU activations and dropout with probability $0.5$ applied after the first two layers.\n\nThe eavesdropping relay is trained using a joint loss function that considers both semantic inference performance and signal reconstruction quality. The first component is a reconstruction loss weighted by $\\lambda_{E,\\mathrm{rec}}$, which measures the squared difference between the reconstructed sample $\\hat{\\mathbf{s}}_E$ and the original sample $\\mathbf{s}$. Here, $\\hat{\\mathbf{s}}_E$, generated as $d_{\\theta_E}^{\\mathrm{rec}}(\\mathbf{y}_E)$, denotes the reconstruction produced by the eavesdropper reconstruction decoder from the received observation $\\mathbf{y}_E$. Minimizing this term encourages the eavesdropper to accurately reconstruct the transmitted sample. The second component is a semantic classification loss weighted by $\\lambda_{E,\\mathrm{cls}}$, given by the categorical cross-entropy loss $\\mathcal{L}_{\\mathrm{CE}}(\\mathbf{z}_E,l)$, where $\\mathbf{z}_E$ represents the semantic prediction logits generated by the eavesdropper and $l$ denotes the ground-truth semantic label. Minimizing this term improves the semantic classification capability of the eavesdropper. For performance evaluation, the reconstruction and semantic classification losses are weighted by $\\lambda_{E,\\mathrm{rec}}\\!=\\!1$ and $\\lambda_{E,\\mathrm{cls}}\\!=\\!1$, respectively, giving equal importance to reconstruction fidelity and semantic inference performance during eavesdropper training.\nOnly the parameters $(\\theta_E^{\\mathrm{rec}}, \\theta_E^{\\mathrm{cls}})$ are optimized in this stage.\n\n\\subsection{Relay-assisted SemCom Performance and Eavesdropping Vulnerability}\n\nFor performance evaluation, training and evaluation are performed on NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell GPUs using batch size 128, learning rate $10^{-3}$, and 1000 training epochs for each stage. The source encoder, destination decoder system, forwarding relay, and relay-eavesdropper model contain 9.2M, 19.8M, 0.2M, and 18.8M parameters for $N=256$, and 8.7M, 18.0M, 0.2M, and 17.9M parameters for $N=32$. The channel is modeled as Rayleigh fading with AWGN under varying SNR conditions. In this framework, the encoder learns a semantically informative latent representation $\\mathbf{x}$. Since no privacy constraint is imposed during Stage 1, the relay observation $\\mathbf{y}_E$ retains sufficient semantic information, enabling the relay to learn both reconstruction and classification mappings that can achieve performance comparable to that of the legitimate receiver.\n\nWe evaluate the SemCom system across a range of channel conditions, with performance illustrated in terms of semantic classification accuracy, PSNR, and SSIM for both the legitimate receiver (destination) and the eavesdropper (relay). The corresponding trends are shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:baseline_all_metrics}, where each subfigure depicts one metric as a function of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for two latent dimensions, $N=256$ and $N=32$.\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}{0.32\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/Bob_vs_Eve_acc.pdf}\n \\caption{Semantic accuracy.}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}{0.32\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/Bob_vs_Eve_PSNR.pdf}\n \\caption{PSNR.}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}{0.32\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/Bob_vs_Eve_SSIM.pdf}\n \\caption{SSIM.}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption{Performance (semantic accuracy, PSNR, and SSIM) of the destination and eavesdropping relay across SNR for different latent dimensions $N$.}\n \\label{fig:baseline_all_metrics}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\nThe semantic classification accuracy in Fig.~\\ref{fig:baseline_all_metrics}(a) increases with SNR, reflecting improved performance under favorable channel conditions. This trend holds for both latent dimensions. Increasing the latent dimension from $N=32$ to $256$ improves performance for both the destination and relay, as higher-dimensional representations preserve more semantic information. Even at $N\\!=32$, the system maintains reasonable accuracy across SNR values, indicating effective semantic transmission under strong compression. In both cases, the relay's accuracy closely tracks and occasionally exceeds that of the destination because it does not experience the second-hop impairment, directly observes the first-hop representation, and operates on representations that are not optimized to distinguish legitimate from unintended receivers.\n\nThe reconstruction performance, measured by PSNR in Fig.~\\ref{fig:baseline_all_metrics}(b), follows a similar trend, increasing monotonically with SNR for both receivers and both values of $N$. A larger latent dimension yields consistently better reconstruction quality, reflecting increased representational capacity. However, the gap between $N=32$ and $N=256$ remains moderate, indicating that even compact representations preserve a substantial portion of the signal structure. Notably, the PSNR performance for the destination and relay remains closely aligned across both values of $N$, showing that the relay retains access to high-fidelity reconstruction even at lower dimensions.\n\nThe SSIM results in Fig.~\\ref{fig:baseline_all_metrics}(c) show a similar trend. SSIM increases with SNR and latent dimensions, reflecting improved preservation of perceptual structures such as edges and textures. While $N=256$ yields higher SSIM overall, performance at $N=32$ remains strong, indicating that perceptual quality is preserved under aggressive dimensionality reduction. The relay's SSIM closely tracks that of the destination across all conditions, confirming that perceptual information is largely preserved in the relay observation.\n\nTaken together, Fig.~\\ref{fig:baseline_all_metrics} shows that increasing the latent dimension improves both semantic and reconstruction performance, while even reduced dimensions maintain reasonable performance. The close alignment between the destination and relay across all metrics indicates that semantic and structural information remain readily accessible at the relay. This exposes a fundamental vulnerability of SemCom, namely that reducing the representation size alone does not prevent semantic leakage. Even compressed representations retain sufficient information for unintended receivers to recover semantic meaning and signal structure, motivating the need for privacy-aware mechanisms such as adversarial training.\n\nConventional physical-layer security schemes such as transmit power control and source-side artificial noise injection do not provide effective privacy protection in relay-assisted SemCom. Since the relay observes a stronger first-hop signal than the destination, these methods degrade both receivers without selectively suppressing relay inference and therefore do not help increase the destination-relay semantic accuracy gap, as also confirmed by our performance evaluation. This highlights the need for privacy-aware representation learning in relay-assisted SemCom.\n\n\\section{Iterative Adversarial Training for Protection against Untrusted Relay \\label{sec:iterative}}\n\n\\subsection{Alternating Adversarial Optimization}\n\nTo mitigate semantic leakage, an iterative adversarial training framework is introduced in which the legitimate Source-Relay-Destination (SRD) system and the eavesdropper (relay) are updated in an alternating manner. The procedure follows a sequential min-max update rule, where the relay is first trained against a fixed SRD system, and then SRD is updated against a fixed relay. This alternating process is repeated throughout training. Let $\\Theta$ denote the parameters of the legitimate SRD system, including the source, forwarding relay, and destination, and let $\\Phi$, consisting of $\\theta_E^{\\mathrm{rec}}$ and $\\theta_E^{\\mathrm{cls}}$, denote the parameters of the eavesdropping function at the relay (as introduced in Stage 2), corresponding to its reconstruction and classification networks. \n\nAt iteration $t$, the training consists of two steps.\n\n\\begin{enumerate}\n\\item In the first step of iterative optimization, the SRD parameters, denoted by $\\Theta$, are held fixed while the eavesdropping relay parameters, denoted by $\\Phi$, are updated to minimize the relay's own inference loss. At iteration $t$, the relay parameters are updated from $\\Phi^{(t)}$ to $\\Phi^{(t+1)}$ by minimizing the eavesdropping objective $\\mathcal{L}_E(\\Theta^{(t)},\\Phi)$. The eavesdropping loss consists of two components. \n\\begin{enumerate}\n \\item The first component is a reconstruction loss weighted by $\\lambda_{E,\\mathrm{rec}}$, which measures the fidelity of the reconstructed sample $\\hat{\\mathbf{s}}_E$ relative to the original sample $\\mathbf{s}$. Minimizing this term encourages the relay to improve its reconstruction capability, enabling evaluation of stealthy protection.\n \\item The second component is the categorical cross-entropy loss weighted by $\\lambda_{E,\\mathrm{cls}}$, denoted as $\\mathcal{L}_{\\mathrm{CE}}(\\mathbf{z}_E,l)$, where $\\mathbf{z}_E$ represents the semantic prediction logits generated by the eavesdropping relay and $l$ denotes the ground-truth semantic label. Minimizing this term improves the semantic classification capability of the eavesdropping relay.\n\\end{enumerate}\n\nTogether, these two terms define the eavesdropping loss $\\mathcal{L}_E(\\Theta,\\Phi)$ and enable the relay to optimize both semantic inference and reconstruction fidelity while the SRD model remains fixed. In practice, the semantic classification term dominates, reflecting the goal of maximizing the relay's inference capability. This step ensures that the relay acts as a strong adaptive adversary for the current latent representation.\n\n\\item In the second step of iterative optimization, the eavesdropping function of the relay is held fixed while the SRD system parameters, denoted by $\\Theta$, are updated using an adversarially augmented training objective. At iteration $t$, the SRD parameters are updated from $\\Theta^{(t)}$ to $\\Theta^{(t+1)}$ by minimizing an adversarially augmented objective consisting of the legitimate loss $\\mathcal{L}_{\\mathrm{SRD}}(\\Theta)$ and an adversarial penalty term based on the relay's semantic classification loss.\n\\begin{enumerate}\n \\item The first component, denoted by $\\mathcal{L}_{\\mathrm{SRD}}(\\Theta)$, represents the standard training loss of the legitimate SRD communication system and combines reconstruction fidelity and semantic classification objectives for the intended receiver.\n \\item The second component is proportional to the eavesdropping relay's semantic classification loss, denoted as $\\mathcal{L}_{\\mathrm{CE}}(\\mathbf{z}_E,l)$, where $\\mathbf{z}_E$ represents the semantic prediction logits generated by the relay and $l$ denotes the ground-truth semantic label. This term is weighted by the positive coefficient $\\gamma_{\\mathrm{eve}}$, which controls the strength of the adversarial penalty.\n\\end{enumerate}\n\nBecause the relay's semantic classification loss is subtracted from the legitimate objective, the SRD system is encouraged to increase the relay's classification error and reduce its ability to infer semantic labels from the transmitted signal. At the same time, it continues optimizing the legitimate communication objective to preserve reliable semantic inference and reconstruction at the destination, thereby improving privacy while maintaining communication performance.\n\n\\end{enumerate}\n\nThis alternating update induces a competitive dynamic between SRD and the relay. The relay continuously improves its ability to extract semantic information from the relay observation by minimizing $\\mathcal{L}_E$, while SRD adapts by reshaping the transmitted representation to increase the relay's classification error while maintaining its own performance. \n\n\\subsection{Gradient-Based Training Dynamics}\n\nAt the gradient-update level, the optimization proceeds by alternately updating the eavesdropping relay parameters $\\Phi$ and the SRD system parameters $\\Theta$ using gradient descent. The relay parameters $\\Phi$ are updated using the gradient of the eavesdropping loss $\\mathcal{L}_E(\\Theta,\\Phi)$ with respect to $\\Phi$. The update step is scaled by the learning rate $\\eta_E$, which controls the adaptation rate of the eavesdropping relay during training. This update encourages the relay to improve both semantic inference accuracy and reconstruction quality.\n\nThe SRD system parameters $\\Theta$ are updated using the gradient of an adversarially augmented objective consisting of the legitimate communication loss $\\mathcal{L}_{\\mathrm{SRD}}(\\Theta)$ and the adversarial semantic classification term weighted by $\\gamma_{\\mathrm{eve}}$. The update step is scaled by the learning rate $\\eta_M$, which controls the adaptation rate of the SRD system. Because the eavesdropping semantic classification loss $\\mathcal{L}_{\\mathrm{CE}}(\\mathbf{z}_E,l)$ is subtracted from the legitimate objective, the gradient update encourages the SRD system to increase the relay's semantic classification error while still maintaining reliable semantic inference and reconstruction performance for the intended receiver. This alternating optimization reduces the relay's semantic inference capability. Importantly, the adversarial term in the SRD update acts only on the relay's semantic classification loss, rather than its full reconstruction objective. As a result, the training process specifically targets the degradation of semantic inference at the relay, without explicitly suppressing reconstruction quality. This design aligns with the primary goal of enlarging the semantic accuracy gap between the destination and the relay.\n\nOverall, the iterative framework performs alternating adversarial optimization in which the relay adapts to the current transmission strategy while SRD counter-adapts to reduce semantic leakage. Through repeated updates, the learned representation remains discriminative for the legitimate receiver while becoming less separable for the eavesdropper, thereby widening the destination-relay semantic accuracy gap.\n\n\\subsection{Learning Dynamics and Semantic Accuracy Gap}\nNext, we evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed iterative adversarial training framework in improving resistance to eavesdropping. The results are presented for multiple channel conditions, with performance illustrated as a function of the weight assigned to the eavesdropping protection loss, denoted by $\\gamma_{\\mathrm{eve}}$.We adopt $N=256$ for the results in this section. Both the SRD system and the eavesdropping relay are trained using the Adam optimizer with learning rates $\\eta_M=\\eta_E=10^{-3}$. We report the semantic classification accuracy at the destination, the semantic accuracy at the eavesdropping relay, and the resulting destination-relay accuracy gap.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.8\\linewidth]{figures/Evolution_SNR_6_gmma_5.pdf}\n \\caption{Evolution of semantic accuracy at the destination and the relay during iterative adversarial training when SNR = $6$ dB and $\\gamma_{\\mathrm{eve}} = 5$.}\n \\label{fig:training_evolution}\n\\end{figure}\n\nWe first examine the temporal evolution of the adversarial training process. Fig.~\\ref{fig:training_evolution} shows the semantic accuracy at the destination and the relay over training epochs for a representative setting with SNR $= 6$ dB and a moderate adversarial weight $\\gamma_{\\mathrm{eve}} = 5$. At the early stages of training, the destination and the relay exhibit similar performance, reflecting the absence of adversarial separation in the initial learned representation. As training progresses, a clear divergence emerges: the relay's accuracy gradually decreases while the destination's accuracy stabilizes at a higher level. This behavior reflects the alternating training mechanism in which the relay improves inference capability while the legitimate system suppresses relay predictions. Over successive iterations, this interaction widens the semantic accuracy gap between the destination and the relay. The convergence pattern in Fig.~\\ref{fig:training_evolution} indicates a stable equilibrium where the destination maintains high accuracy while the relay's capability is suppressed, demonstrating that the adversarial objective progressively reshapes the latent representation to reduce semantic leakage.\n\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}{0.32\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/Bob_relay_semantic_accuracy_gap_SNR_min6.pdf}\n \\caption{SNR = $-6$ dB.}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}{0.32\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/Bob_relay_semantic_accuracy_gap_SNR_0.pdf}\n \\caption{SNR = $0$ dB.}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}{0.32\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/Bob_relay_semantic_accuracy_gap_SNR_6.pdf}\n \\caption{SNR = $6$ dB.}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption{Effect of adversarial loss weight $\\gamma_{\\mathrm{eve}}$ on semantic accuracy at the destination and the relay, and the resulting accuracy gap.}\n \\label{fig:semantic_gap_all}\n\\end{figure*}\n\nWe next examine the effect of the adversarial loss weight $\\gamma_{\\mathrm{eve}}$ across different channel conditions. As shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:semantic_gap_all}, when $\\gamma_{\\mathrm{eve}} = 0$, corresponding to the non-adversarial baseline, the semantic accuracy at the destination and the relay are nearly identical. This indicates negligible protection against eavesdropping and confirms that, without adversarial training, the learned representation is equally informative to both receivers (namely, the destination and the relay).\n\nAs $\\gamma_{\\mathrm{eve}}$ increases, a clear destination-relay separation emerges across all SNRs. The relay's semantic accuracy decreases significantly, while the destination remains stable initially. This shows that adversarial loss reduces semantic separability at the relay, degrading the relay's inference capability while preserving representation utility for the destination.\n\nAt moderate values of $\\gamma_{\\mathrm{eve}}$, the destination-relay accuracy gap reaches its maximum, corresponding to an effective trade-off between utility and privacy. In this regime, strong protection is achieved with only limited degradation in the destination's performance. The consistency of this behavior across SNR conditions suggests that adversarial training is robust and effective in controlling semantic leakage.\n\nAs $\\gamma_{\\mathrm{eve}}$ increases further, the destination's accuracy begins to degrade more noticeably, while the accuracy gap saturates or slightly decreases. This indicates that excessively strong adversarial pressure distorts the latent representation, affecting both receivers and reducing overall semantic discriminability rather than selectively suppressing the relay.\n\nSNR also affects these trends. At higher SNR, the destination remains stable across a wider range of $\\gamma_{\\mathrm{eve}}$, yielding a larger accuracy gap. At lower SNR, the system becomes more sensitive to adversarial representation shaping, and the destination's accuracy degrades more rapidly as $\\gamma_{\\mathrm{eve}}$ increases. Nevertheless, meaningful destination-relay separation is still achieved.\n\nOverall, the results demonstrate that the proposed iterative adversarial training framework effectively enlarges the destination-relay semantic accuracy gap both over training time and as a function of the adversarial loss weight. The framework enables controlled navigation of the privacy-utility trade-off, achieving strong semantic protection while preserving performance along the legitimate communication path.\n\n\\subsection{Reconstruction Quality}\n\nIn addition to semantic accuracy, we evaluate the impact of the adversarial training on reconstruction quality at both destination and relay. While the iterative framework is designed to enlarge the semantic accuracy gap, an important question is whether this degradation at the relay is accompanied by noticeable distortion in the reconstructed sample. To quantify this, we measure the difference between the destination and the relay in terms of PSNR and SSIM across SNR conditions.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\caption{Destination-relay reconstruction quality gap.}\n\\footnotesize\n\\label{tab:psnr_ssim_gap}\n\\begin{tabular}{c|cc|cc}\n\\hline\n\\multirow{2}{*}{SNR (dB)} & \\multicolumn{2}{c|}{PSNR Difference (dB)} & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{SSIM Difference} \\\\ \n & Max & Avg & Max & Avg \\\\\n\\hline\n-6 & 0.38 & 0.24 & 0.018 & 0.008 \\\\\n0 & 0.54 & 0.28 & 0.014 & 0.007 \\\\\n6 & 0.34 & 0.23 & 0.010 & 0.008 \\\\\n\\hline\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\nThe results in Table~\\ref{tab:psnr_ssim_gap} show that the difference in reconstruction quality between the destination and the relay remains consistently small across all SNR values. Both the maximum and average PSNR differences are limited, indicating that the relay is still able to reconstruct the input sample with fidelity comparable to that of the destination. Similarly, the SSIM differences remain very small, confirming that perceptual structural similarity is largely preserved at the relay.\n\nThese results demonstrate stealthy protection, where the relay's semantic accuracy is degraded while reconstruction quality remains largely intact. Thus, the relay observes structurally consistent signals but fails to infer their semantic content, achieving semantic-specific degradation without noticeable signal distortion. Overall, a large semantic accuracy gap with minimal reconstruction difference indicates effective selective information hiding.\n\n\\section{Conclusion \\label{sec:conclusion}}\nThis paper addressed the privacy implications of relay-assisted SemCom and showed that relay nodes can act as capable eavesdroppers, extracting semantic meaning from transmitted latent representations. We first demonstrated that the relay can achieve semantic inference and reconstruction performance comparable to that of the legitimate receiver, revealing a fundamental vulnerability. To mitigate this issue, we proposed an iterative adversarial training framework that explicitly accounts for a strong adaptive eavesdropper. By alternating between optimizing the legitimate system and the eavesdropper, the framework learns representations that preserve utility at the intended receiver while degrading semantic inference at the relay. This significantly enlarges the semantic accuracy gap across channel conditions while maintaining high reconstruction fidelity. The protection is achieved in a stealthy manner, selectively suppressing semantic information without noticeable signal distortion. These findings highlight the privacy risks of semantic relays and the need for privacy-aware training in relay-assisted SemCom systems.\n\nFuture research directions include (i) extending relay-assisted SemCom to multi-relay, multi-hop, and multi-user networks to study semantic leakage in distributed cooperative architectures, (ii) developing cross-layer privacy-aware SemCom designs that jointly optimize routing, scheduling, relay selection, and semantic resource allocation while accounting for leakage across communication paths, and (iii) extending the framework to decentralized and federated semantic learning settings where privacy leakage may arise through shared model updates and latent representations.\n\n\\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}\n\\bibliography{references}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: references.bib\n================================================\n@article{gunduz2022beyond,\n title={Beyond transmitting bits: Context, semantics, and task-oriented communications},\n author={G{\\\"u}nd{\\\"u}z, Deniz and Qin, Zhijin and Aguerri, Inaki Estella and Dhillon, Harpreet S and Yang, Zhaohui and Yener, Aylin and Wong, Kai Kit and Chae, Chan-Byoung},\n journal={IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications},\n volume={41},\n number={1},\n pages={5--41},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{xie2021deep,\n title={Deep learning enabled semantic communication systems},\n author={Xie, Huiqiang and Qin, Zhijin and Li, Geoffrey Ye and Juang, Biing-Hwang},\n journal={IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing},\n volume={69},\n pages={2663--2675},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@article{kountouris2021semantics,\n title={Semantics-empowered communication for networked intelligent systems},\n author={Kountouris, Marios and Pappas, Nikolaos},\n journal={IEEE Communications Magazine},\n volume={59},\n number={6},\n pages={96--102},\n year={2021},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n\n@article{uysal2021semantic,\n title={Semantic communications in networked systems},\n author={Uysal, Elif and Kaya, Onur and Ephremides, Anthony and Gross, James and Codreanu, Marian and Popovski, Petar and Assaad, Mohamad and Liva, Gianluigi and Munari, Andrea and Soleymani, Touraj and Soret, Beatriz Soret and Johansson, Henrik},\n journal={IEEE Network},\n volume={36},\n number={4},\n pages={233--240},\n year={2022}\n }\n\n@ARTICLE{Adesina2022,\n author={Adesina, Damilola and Hsieh, Chung-Chu and Sagduyu, Yalin E. and Qian, Lijun},\n journal={IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials}, \n title={Adversarial Machine Learning in Wireless Communications using {RF} Data: A Review}, \n year={2023},\n volume={25},\n number={1},\n pages={77-100}\n }\n\n@article{yates2021age,\n title={Age of information: An introduction and survey},\n author={Yates, Roy D and Sun, Yin and Brown, D Richard and Kaul, Sanjit K and Modiano, Eytan and Ulukus, Sennur},\n journal={IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications},\n volume={39},\n number={5},\n pages={1183--1210},\n year={2021},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{sagduyu2023age,\n title={Age of information in deep learning-driven task-oriented communications},\n author={Sagduyu, Yalin E and Ulukus, Sennur and Yener, Aylin},\n booktitle={IEEE INFOCOM Age of Information Workshop},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{sagduyu2022vulnerabilities,\n author={Sagduyu, Yalin E. and Erpek, Tugba and Ulukus, Sennur and Yener, Aylin},\n booktitle={Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS)}, \n title={Vulnerabilities of Deep Learning-Driven Semantic Communications to Backdoor (Trojan) Attacks}, \n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{sagduyu2023task,\n title={Task-oriented communications for {nextG}: End-to-end deep learning and {AI} security aspects},\n author={Sagduyu, Yalin E and Ulukus, Sennur and Yener, Aylin},\n journal={IEEE Wireless Communications},\n volume={30},\n number={3},\n pages={52--60},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{shi2023task,\n author={Shi, Yuanming and Zhou, Yong and Wen, Dingzhu and Wu, Youlong and Jiang, Chunxiao and Letaief, Khaled B.},\n journal={IEEE Wireless Communications}, \n title={{Task-Oriented Communications for {6G}: Vision, Principles, and Technologies}}, \n year={2023},\n volume={30},\n number={3},\n pages={78-85}\n}\n\n@article{sagduyu2023joint,\n title={Joint Sensing and Semantic Communications with Multi-Task Deep Learning},\n author={Sagduyu, Yalin E and Erpek, Tugba and Yener, Aylin and Ulukus, Sennur},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05017},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{sagduyu2023multi,\n title={Multi-Receiver Task-Oriented Communications via Multi-Task Deep Learning},\n author={Sagduyu, Yalin E and Erpek, Tugba and Yener, Aylin and Ulukus, Sennur},\n booktitle={IEEE Future Networks World Forum},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{mortaheb2022personalized,\n title={Personalized federated multi-task learning over wireless fading channels},\n author={Mortaheb, Matin and Vahapoglu, Cemil and Ulukus, Sennur},\n journal={Algorithms},\n volume={15},\n number={11},\n pages={421},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{sagduyu2022semanticsecurity,\n author={Sagduyu, Yalin E. and Erpek, Tugba and Ulukus, Sennur and Yener, Aylin},\n journal={IEEE Communications Magazine}, \n title={Is Semantic Communication Secure? {A} Tale of Multi-Domain Adversarial Attacks}, \n year={2023},\n volume={61},\n number={11},\n pages={50-55}\n}\n\n@article{liu2022integrated,\n title={Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-functional wireless networks for {6G} and beyond},\n author={Liu, Fan and Cui, Yuanhao and Masouros, Christos and Xu, Jie and Han, Tony Xiao and Eldar, Yonina C and Buzzi, Stefano},\n journal={IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications},\n volume={40},\n number={6},\n pages={1728--1767},\n year={2022},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n\n\n\n@misc{chang2025privacypreservingsemanticcommunications,\n title={Privacy Preserving Semantic Communications Using Vision Language Models: A Segmentation and Generation Approach}, \n author={Haoran Chang and Mingzhe Chen and Huaxia Wang and Qianqian Zhang},\n year={2025},\n eprint={2509.08142},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={eess.SP},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08142}, \n}\n\n\n\n@article{bourtsoulatze2019deep,\n title={Deep joint source-channel coding for wireless image transmission},\n author={Bourtsoulatze, Eirina and Kurka, David Burth and G{\\\"u}nd{\\\"u}z, Deniz},\n journal={IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking},\n volume={5},\n number={3},\n pages={567--579},\n year={2019},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n\n@article{Kurka2021BandwidthAgile,\n author = {Kurka, David Burth and G{\\\"u}nd{\\\"u}z, Deniz},\n journal = {IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications},\n title = {Bandwidth-Agile Image Transmission With Deep Joint Source-Channel Coding},\n year = {2021},\n volume = {20},\n number = {12},\n pages = {8081--8095},\n month = dec,\n doi = {10.1109/TWC.2021.3090048}\n}\n\n@article{Xu2023VisualProtection,\n author = {Xu, Rui and Zhang, Ping and Rodrigues, Miguel R. D. and G{\\\"u}nd{\\\"u}z, Deniz},\n journal = {IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking},\n title = {Deep Joint Source-Channel Coding for Image Transmission With Visual Protection},\n year = {2023},\n volume = {9},\n number = {6},\n pages = {1399--1411}}\n %month = dec,\n doi = {10.1109/TCCN.2023.3306851}\n\n\n\n@article{wang2024privacy,\n title={Privacy-preserving task-oriented semantic communications against model inversion attacks},\n author={Wang, Yanhu and Guo, Shuaishuai and Deng, Yiqin and Zhang, Haixia and Fang, Yuguang},\n journal={IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications},\n volume={23},\n number={8},\n pages={10150--10165},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{sagduyu2024will,\n title={Will {6G} be semantic communications? {O}pportunities and challenges from task oriented and secure communications to integrated sensing},\n author={Sagduyu, Yalin E and Erpek, Tugba and Yener, Aylin and Ulukus, Sennur},\n journal={IEEE Network},\n volume={38},\n number={6},\n pages={72-80},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{guo2024survey,\n author={Guo, Shaolong and Wang, Yuntao and Zhang, Ning and Su, Zhou and Luan, Tom H. and Tian, Zhiyi and Shen, Xuemin},\n journal={IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials}, \n title={A Survey on Semantic Communication Networks: Architecture, Security, and Privacy}, \n year={2025},\n volume={27},\n number={5},\n pages={2860-2894}\n}\n\n@article{guler2018semantic,\n title={The semantic communication game},\n author={G{\\\"u}ler, Ba{\\c{s}}ak and Yener, Aylin and Swami, Ananthram},\n journal={IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking},\n volume={4},\n number={4},\n pages={787--802},\n year={2018}\n}\n\n@article{bloch2021overview,\n title={An overview of information-theoretic security and privacy: Metrics, limits and applications},\n author={Bloch, Matthieu and G{\\\"u}nl{\\\"u}, Onur and Yener, Aylin and Oggier, Fr{\\'e}d{\\'e}rique and Poor, H Vincent and Sankar, Lalitha and Schaefer, Rafael F},\n journal={IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory},\n volume={2},\n number={1},\n pages={5--22},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@article{chen2023covert,\n title={Covert communications: A comprehensive survey},\n author={Chen, Xinying and An, Jianping and Xiong, Zehui and Xing, Chengwen and Zhao, Nan and Yu, F Richard and Nallanathan, Arumugam},\n journal={IEEE Communications Surveys \\& Tutorials},\n volume={25},\n number={2},\n pages={1173--1198},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{liu2025knowledge,\n title={Knowledge-Assisted Privacy Preserving in Semantic Communication},\n author={Liu, Xuesong and Sun, Yao and Cheng, Runze and Xia, Le and Abumarshoud, Hanaa and Zhang, Lei and Imran, Muhammad Ali},\n journal={IEEE Wireless Communications},\n volume={32},\n number={2},\n pages={76--83},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{guo2025semantic,\n title={Semantic-enabled {6G} communication: A task-oriented and privacy-preserving perspective},\n author={Guo, Shuaishuai and Zhang, Anbang and Wang, Yanhu and Feng, Chenyuan and Quek, Tony QS},\n journal={IEEE Network},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n\n@article{cheng2024knowledge,\n title={Knowledge discrepancy oriented privacy preserving for semantic communication},\n author={Cheng, Shiqi and Zhang, Xuefei and Sun, Yao and Cui, Qimei and Tao, Xiaofeng},\n journal={IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology},\n volume={73},\n number={8},\n pages={11637--11646},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{luo2023encrypted,\n title={Encrypted semantic communication using adversarial training for privacy preserving},\n author={Luo, Xinlai and Chen, Zhiyong and Tao, Meixia and Yang, Feng},\n journal={IEEE Communications Letters},\n volume={27},\n number={6},\n pages={1486--1490},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{zhao2023data,\n title={Data utilization versus privacy protection in semantic communications},\n author={Zhao, Lindong and Wu, Dan and Zhou, Liang},\n journal={IEEE Wireless Communications},\n volume={30},\n number={3},\n pages={44--50},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{wang2024star,\n title={STAR-RIS-assisted privacy protection in semantic communication system},\n author={Wang, Yiru and Yang, Wanting and Guan, Pengxin and Zhao, Yuping and Xiong, Zehui},\n journal={IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology},\n volume={73},\n number={9},\n pages={13915--13920},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{yang2024secure,\n title={Secure semantic communications: Fundamentals and challenges},\n author={Yang, Zhaohui and Chen, Mingzhe and Li, Gaolei and Yang, Yang and Zhang, Zhaoyang},\n journal={IEEE Network},\n volume={38},\n number={6},\n pages={513--520},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{liu2023semprotector,\n title={SemProtector: A unified framework for semantic protection in deep learning-based semantic communication systems},\n author={Liu, Xinghan and Nan, Guoshun and Cui, Qimei and Li, Zeju and Liu, Peiyuan and Xing, Zebin and Mu, Hanqing and Tao, Xiaofeng and Quek, Tony QS},\n journal={IEEE Communications Magazine},\n volume={61},\n number={11},\n pages={56--62},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n\n@IEEEtranBSTCTL{BSTcontrol,\n CTLdash_repeated_names = \"no\"\n}\n\n@article{uysal2021semantic,\n title={Semantic communications in networked systems},\n author={Uysal, Elif and Kaya, Onur and Ephremides, Anthony and Gross, James and Codreanu, Marian and Popovski, Petar and Assaad, Mohamad and Liva, Gianluigi and Munari, Andrea and Soleymani, Touraj and Soret, Beatriz Soret and Johansson, Henrik},\n journal={IEEE Network},\n volume={36},\n number={4},\n pages={233--240},\n year={2022}\n }\n\n\n@article{lin2024semantic,\n title={Semantic-forward relaying: A novel framework toward {6G} cooperative communications},\n author={Lin, Wensheng and Yan, Yuna and Li, Lixin and Han, Zhu and Matsumoto, Tad},\n journal={IEEE Communications Letters},\n volume={28},\n number={3},\n pages={518--522},\n year={2024},\n}\n\n@inproceedings{arda2024semantic,\n title={Semantic forwarding for next generation relay networks},\n author={Arda, Enes and Kutay, Emrecan and Yener, Aylin},\n booktitle={IEEE Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS)},\n year={2024},\n}\n\n@inproceedings{arda2025semantic,\n title={Semantic Relaying of Sentences},\n author={Arda, Enes and Kutay, Emrecan and Yener, Aylin},\n booktitle={IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{guo2024distributed,\n title={Distributed task-oriented communication networks with multimodal semantic relay and edge intelligence},\n author={Guo, Jie and Chen, Hao and Song, Bin and Chi, Yuhao and Yuen, Chau and Yu, Fei Richard and Li, Geoffrey Ye and Niyato, Dusit},\n journal={IEEE Communications Magazine},\n volume={62},\n number={6},\n pages={82--89},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n\n@article{sagduyu2025privacy,\n title={Privacy-Preserving Semantic Communications via Multi-Task Learning and Adversarial Perturbations},\n author={Sagduyu, Yalin E and Erpek, Tugba and Yener, Aylin and Ulukus, Sennur},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.24452},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{sagduyu2025securing,\n title={Securing Semantic Communications Against Adversarial Attacks},\n author={Sagduyu, Yalin E and Yener, Aylin and Ulukus, Sennur},\n journal={Foundations of Semantic Communication Networks},\n pages={309--338},\n year={2025},\n publisher={Wiley Online Library}\n}\n\n@article{sagduyu2023semantic,\n title={Is semantic communication secure? {A} tale of multi-domain adversarial attacks},\n author={Sagduyu, Yalin E and Erpek, Tugba and Ulukus, Sennur and Yener, Aylin},\n journal={IEEE Communications Magazine},\n volume={61},\n number={11},\n pages={50--55},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{sagduyu2023vulnerabilities,\n title={Vulnerabilities of deep learning-driven semantic communications to backdoor (Trojan) attacks},\n author={Sagduyu, Yalin E and Erpek, Tugba and Ulukus, Sennur and Yener, Aylin},\n booktitle={IEEE Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS)},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{guler2014,\n author={Guler, Basak and Yener, Aylin},\n booktitle={IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PERCOM WORKSHOPS)}, \n title={Semantic index assignment}, \n year={2014},\n volume={},\n number={},\n keywords={Semantics;Indexes;Automobiles;Taxonomy;Simulated annealing;Color},\n doi={10.1109/PerComW.2014.6815245}}\n\n\n@article{huang2022toward,\n title={Toward semantic communications: Deep learning-based image semantic coding},\n author={Huang, Danlan and Gao, Feifei and Tao, Xiaoming and Du, Qiyuan and Lu, Jianhua},\n journal={IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications},\n volume={41},\n number={1},\n pages={55--71},\n year={2022},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{arda2025semantic,\n title={Semantic Relaying of Sentences},\n author={Arda, Enes and Kutay, Emrecan and Yener, Aylin},\n booktitle={IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{luo2022autoencoder,\n title={Autoencoder-based semantic communication systems with relay channels},\n author={Luo, Xinlai and Yin, Benshun and Chen, Zhiyong and Xia, Bin and Wang, Jiangzhou},\n booktitle={IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) Workshops},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091174,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31974"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31974"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Taylor J. Smith"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Taylor J. Smith"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Complexity of Universality and Related Decision Problems for Unary Two-Dimensional Automata"},"comments":{"kind":"null"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.FL cs.CC"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"A two-dimensional automaton is able to move its input head through its input word in four directions: upward, downward, leftward, and rightward. If we prevent the input head from moving upward, then we obtain a three-way two-dimensional automaton; preventing both upward and leftward movements results in a two-way two-dimensional automaton. While much is known about the decidability and complexity properties of the two-dimensional automaton model, the unary variant of this model is less studied.\n We show that the universality, equivalence, and inclusion problems for unary three-way deterministic two-dimensional automata are coNP-hard, while for the corresponding two-way model, the universality, equivalence, inclusion, and disjointness problems are in P. We further show that the universality, equivalence, and inclusion problems for unary two-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automata are coNP-hard and in ELEMENTARY; and the disjointness problem for the same model is NL-hard and in ELEMENTARY. Finally, we establish the decidability of a bounded variant of the universality problem for unary three-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automata, and show that this variant problem is coNP-complete."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:15:26 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:15:26 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Smith","Taylor J.",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Smith\",\n \"Taylor J.\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: References.bib\n================================================\n@inproceedings{\n\tBlumHewitt19672DAutomata,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Blum, Manuel and Hewitt, Carl\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Automata on a 2-dimensional tape\",\n\tbooktitle\t=\t\"Proceedings of the 8th Annual Symposium on Switching and Automata Theory ({SWAT} 1967)\",\n\teditor\t=\t\"Miller, R. E.\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"155--160\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1967\",\n}\n\n@inproceedings{\n\tBlumSakoda1977CapabilityFiniteAutomata,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Blum, Manuel and Sakoda, William J.\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"On the capability of finite automata in 2 and 3 dimensional space\",\n\tbooktitle\t=\t\"Proceedings of the 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science ({FOCS} 1977)\",\n\teditor\t=\t\"Young, P.\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"147--161\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1977\",\n}\n\n@inproceedings{\n\tFischerRabin1974SuperExponentialPresburger,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Fischer, Michael J. and Rabin, Michael O.\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Super-Exponential Complexity of {P}resburger Arithmetic\",\n\tbooktitle\t=\t\"Complexity of Computation\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"7\",\n\tseries\t=\t\"{SIAM}-{AMS} Proceedings\",\n\teditor\t=\t\"Karp, R. M.\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"27--41\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1974\",\n}\n\n@article{\n\tGalil1976HierarchiesCompleteProblems,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Galil, Zvi\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Hierarchies of Complete Problems\",\n\tjournal\t=\t\"Acta Informatica\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"6\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"77--88\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1976\",\n}\n\n@article{\n\tGeffert2007ComplementingTwoWay,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Geffert, Viliam and Mereghetti, Carlo and Pighizzini, Giovanni\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Complementing two-way finite automata\",\n\tjournal\t=\t\"Information and Computation\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"205\",\n\tnumber\t=\t\"8\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"1173--1187\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"2007\",\n}\n\n@incollection{\n\tGiammarresiRestivo19972DLanguages,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Giammarresi, Dora and Restivo, Antonio\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Two-dimensional Languages\",\n\tbooktitle\t=\t\"Handbook of Formal Languages\",\n\tpublisher\t=\t\"Springer-Verlag\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1997\",\n\teditor\t=\t\"Rozenberg, G. and Salomaa, A.\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"3\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"215--267\",\n\taddress\t=\t\"Berlin Heidelberg\",\n}\n\n@article{\n\tGinsburgSpanier1966PresburgerFormulas,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Ginsburg, Seymour and Spanier, Edwin H.\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Semigroups, {P}resburger Formulas, and Languages\",\n\tjournal\t=\t\"Pacific Journal of Mathematics\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"16\",\n\tnumber\t=\t\"2\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"285--296\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1966\",\n}\n\n@article{\n\tImmerman1988NLClosedComplementation,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Immerman, Neil\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Nondeterministic Space is Closed Under Complementation\",\n\tjournal\t=\t\"{SIAM} Journal on Computing\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"17\",\n\tnumber\t=\t\"5\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"935--938\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1988\",\n}\n\n@article{\n\tInoue19912DAutomataSurvey,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Inoue, Katsushi and Takanami, Itsuo\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"A Survey of Two-Dimensional Automata Theory\",\n\tjournal\t=\t\"Information Sciences\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"55\",\n\tnumber\t=\t\"1--3\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"99--121\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1991\",\n}\n\n@article {\n\tInoueTakanami1980DecisionProblems2DAutomata,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Inoue, Katsushi and Takanami, Itsuo\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"A note on decision problems for three-way two-dimensional finite automata\",\n\tjournal\t=\t\"Information Processing Letters\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"10\",\n\tnumber\t=\t\"4--5\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"245--248\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1980\",\n}\n\n@article{\n\tJones1975SpaceBoundedReducibility,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Jones, Neil D.\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Space-Bounded Reducibility among Combinatorial Problems\",\n\tjournal\t=\t\"Journal of Computer and System Sciences\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"11\",\n\tnumber\t=\t\"1\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"68--85\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1975\",\n}\n\n@inproceedings{\n\tKarp1972Reducibility,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Karp, Richard M.\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems\",\n\tbooktitle\t=\t\"Complexity of Computer Computations\",\n\teditor\t=\t\"Miller, R. E. and Thatcher, J. W.\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"85--103\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1972\",\n}\n\n@article {\n\tKinber1985ThreeWayAutomataOneLetter,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Kinber, Efim B.\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Three-Way Automata on Rectangular Tapes over a One-Letter Alphabet\",\n\tjournal\t=\t\"Information Sciences\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"35\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"61--77\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1985\",\n}\n\n@article{\n\tLenstra1983IntegerProgrammingFixedVariables,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Lenstra, Jr., Hendrik W.\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Integer Programming with a Fixed Number of Variables\",\n\tjournal\t=\t\"Mathematics of Operations Research\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"8\",\n\tnumber\t=\t\"4\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"538--548\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1983\",\n}\n\n@article {\n\tLindgren1998Complexity2DPatterns,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Lindgren, Kristian and Moore, Cristopher and Nordahl, Mats\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Complexity of Two-Dimensional Patterns\",\n\tjournal\t=\t\"Journal of Statistical Physics\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"91\",\n\tnumber\t=\t\"5/6\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"909--951\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1998\",\n}\n\n@book{\n\tMinsky1967Computation,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Minsky, Marvin L.\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Computation: Finite and Infinite Machines\",\n\tpublisher\t=\t\"Prentice-Hall\",\n\tseries\t=\t\"Series in Automatic Computation\",\n\taddress\t=\t\"Englewood Cliffs\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1967\",\n}\n\n@article {\n\tOppen1978UpperBoundPresburger,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Oppen, Derek C.\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"A $2^{2^{2^{pn}}}$ Upper Bound on the Complexity of {P}resburger Arithmetic\",\n\tjournal\t=\t\"Journal of Computer and System Sciences\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"16\",\n\tnumber\t=\t\"3\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"323--332\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1978\",\n}\n\n@article{\n\tParikh1966OnCFLs,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Parikh, Rohit J.\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"On Context-Free Languages\",\n\tjournal\t=\t\"Journal of the {ACM}\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"13\",\n\tnumber\t=\t\"4\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"570--581\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1966\",\n}\n\n@inproceedings{\n\tPresburger1930Arithmetik,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Presburger, Moj{\\.z}esz\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"{\\\"U}ber die {V}ollst{\\\"a}ndigkeit eines gewissen {S}ystems der {A}rithmetik ganzer {Z}ahlen, in welchem die {A}ddition als einzige {O}peration hervortritt\",\n\tbooktitle\t=\t\"Comptes Rendus du {I} Congr{\\`e}s des Math{\\'e}maticiens des Pays Slaves\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"92--101\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1930\",\n}\n\n@book{\n\tRosenfeld1979PictureLanguages,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Rosenfeld, Azriel\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Picture Languages: Formal Models for Picture Recognition\",\n\tpublisher\t=\t\"Academic Press\",\n\tseries\t=\t\"Computer Science and Applied Mathematics\",\n\taddress\t=\t\"New York\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1979\",\n}\n\n@techreport{\n\tSmith2019TwoDimensionalAutomata,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Smith, Taylor J.\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Two-Dimensional Automata\",\n\tinstitution\t=\t\"Queen's University\",\n\ttype\t=\t\"Technical report\",\n\tnumber\t=\t\"2019-637\",\n\taddress\t=\t\"Kingston\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"2019\",\n}\n\n@phdthesis{\n Smith2021PhDThesis,\n author = \"Smith, Taylor J.\",\n title = \"Closure, Decidability, and Complexity Results for Restricted Variants of Two-Dimensional Automata\",\n school = \"Queen's University\",\n type = \"Doctoral thesis\",\n year = \"2021\",\n}\n\n@article{\n\tSmithSalomaa20212D3WProperties,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Smith, Taylor J. and Salomaa, Kai\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Decision Problems and Projection Languages for Restricted Variants of Two-Dimensional Automata\",\n\tjournal\t=\t\"Theoretical Computer Science\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"870\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"153--164\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"2021\",\n}\n\n@article{\n\tSmithSalomaa20232DProjection,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Smith, Taylor J. and Salomaa, Kai\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Recognition and Complexity Results for Projection Languages of Two-Dimensional Automata\",\n\tjournal\t=\t\"Journal of Automata, Languages, and Combinatorics\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"28\",\n\tnumber\t=\t\"1--3\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"201--220\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"2023\",\n}\n\n@inproceedings{\n\tStockmeyerMeyer1973WordProblems,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Stockmeyer, Larry J. and Meyer, Albert R.\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"Word Problems Requiring Exponential Time: Preliminary Report\",\n\tbooktitle\t=\t\"Proceedings of the 5th Annual {ACM} Symposium on Theory of Computing ({STOC} 1973)\",\n\teditor\t=\t\"Aho, A. V.\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"1--9\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1973\",\n}\n\n@article{\n\tSzelepcsenyi1988ForcedEnumeration,\n\tauthor\t=\t\"Szelepcs{\\'e}nyi, R{\\'o}bert\",\n\ttitle\t=\t\"The Method of Forced Enumeration for Nondeterministic Automata\",\n\tjournal\t=\t\"Acta Informatica\",\n\tvolume\t=\t\"26\",\n\tpages\t=\t\"279--284\",\n\tyear\t=\t\"1988\",\n}\n\n================================================\nFILE: SmithUnary2DUniversality.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[12pt]{article}\n\n\\usepackage{algorithm}\t\t\t\t% algorithms\n\\usepackage[noend]{algpseudocode}\t% algorithms\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\t\t\t\t% math package\n\\usepackage{amssymb}\t\t\t\t% math package\n\\usepackage{amsthm}\t\t\t\t\t% math package\n\\usepackage{caption}\n\\usepackage{color}\n\\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}\n\\usepackage[hidelinks]{hyperref}\n\\usepackage{titling}\n\n\\usepackage{complexity}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{tikz}\n\\usetikzlibrary{matrix, shapes}\n\n\\theoremstyle{plain}\t\t\t\t% AMS theorem styles\n\\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}\n\\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}\n\\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}\n\\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}\n\\newtheorem{conjecture}[theorem]{Conjecture}\n\n\\theoremstyle{definition}\t\t\t% AMS definition styles\n\\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}\n\\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}\n\n\\theoremstyle{remark}\t\t\t\t% AMS remark styles\n\\newtheorem*{remark}{Remark}\n\\newtheorem*{note}{Note}\n\\newtheorem*{claim}{Claim}\n\n\\captionsetup[algorithm]{labelsep=colon}\t% algorithm caption\n\n\\thanksmarkseries{alph}\n\n% circle symbols\n\\newcommand*\\circled[1]{\\tikz[baseline=(char.base)]{\\node[shape=circle,draw,inner sep=0.5pt] (char) {#1};}}\n\\newcommand*\\dashedcirc[1]{\\tikz[baseline=(char.base)]{\\node[shape=circle,draw,thick,dashed,inner sep=0.5pt] (char) {#1};}}\n\n% ellipse symbols\n\\newcommand*\\ellipsed[1]{\\tikz[baseline=(char.base)]{\\node[shape=rounded rectangle,draw,inner sep=1.25pt] (char) {#1};}}\n\\newcommand*\\dashedell[1]{\\tikz[baseline=(char.base)]{\\node[shape=rounded rectangle,draw,dashed,inner sep=1.25pt] (char) {#1};}}\n\n\\usepackage{pifont} % cmark and xmark\n\\newcommand{\\cmark}{\\ding{51}}\n\\newcommand{\\xmark}{\\ding{55}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\from}{\\colon}\n\n\\newcommand{\\DFA}{\\textsf{DFA}}\n\\newcommand{\\DFATW}{\\textsf{DFA-2W}}\n\\newcommand{\\NFA}{\\textsf{NFA}}\n\\newcommand{\\NFATW}{\\textsf{NFA-2W}}\n\\newcommand{\\TDFA}{\\textsf{2DFA-4W}}\n\\newcommand{\\TDFAOS}{\\textsf{2DFA-4W-1$\\Sigma$}}\n\\newcommand{\\TDFATW}{\\textsf{2DFA-3W}}\n\\newcommand{\\TDFATWOS}{\\textsf{2DFA-3W-1$\\Sigma$}}\n\\newcommand{\\TDFATWOW}{\\textsf{2DFA-2W}}\n\\newcommand{\\TDFATWOWOS}{\\textsf{2DFA-2W-1$\\Sigma$}}\n\\newcommand{\\TNFA}{\\textsf{2NFA-4W}}\n\\newcommand{\\TNFAOS}{\\textsf{2NFA-4W-1$\\Sigma$}}\n\\newcommand{\\TNFATW}{\\textsf{2NFA-3W}}\n\\newcommand{\\TNFATWOS}{\\textsf{2NFA-3W-1$\\Sigma$}}\n\\newcommand{\\TNFATWOW}{\\textsf{2NFA-2W}}\n\\newcommand{\\TNFATWOWOS}{\\textsf{2NFA-2W-1$\\Sigma$}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\todo}[1]{\\noindent{\\color{red}\\textbf{To do.} #1}}\n\n%%%%%%\n\n\\title{Complexity of Universality and Related Decision Problems for Unary Two-Dimensional Automata}\n\\author{\n\tTaylor J. Smith \\thanks{Department of Computer Science, St.\\ Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada. Email: \\href{mailto:tjsmith@stfx.ca}{\\texttt{tjsmith@stfx.ca}}.}\n}\n\\date{\\today}\n\n%%%%%%\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n%%%%%%\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\\begin{abstract}\nA two-dimensional automaton is able to move its input head through its input word in four directions: upward, downward, leftward, and rightward. If we prevent the input head from moving upward, then we obtain a three-way two-dimensional automaton; preventing both upward and leftward movements results in a two-way two-dimensional automaton. While much is known about the decidability and complexity properties of the two-dimensional automaton model, the unary variant of this model is less studied.\n\nWe show that the universality, equivalence, and inclusion problems for unary three-way deterministic two-dimensional automata are \\co\\NP-hard, while for the corresponding two-way model, the universality, equivalence, inclusion, and disjointness problems are in \\P. We further show that the universality, equivalence, and inclusion problems for unary two-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automata are \\co\\NP-hard and in \\ELEMENTARY; and the disjointness problem for the same model is \\NL-hard and in \\ELEMENTARY. Finally, we establish the decidability of a bounded variant of the universality problem for unary three-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automata, and show that this variant problem is \\co\\NP-complete.\n\n\\medskip\n\n\\noindent\\textit{Key words and phrases:} Complexity theory, decision problem, two-dimensional automaton, unary language, universality.\n\n\\medskip\n\n\\noindent\\textit{MSC2020 classes:} 68Q45 (primary); 68Q17 (secondary).\n\\end{abstract}\n\n%%%%%%\n\n\\section{Introduction}\\label{sec:introduction}\n\nA two-dimensional automaton is a generalization of the classical one-dimensional finite automaton that takes as input arrays or matrices of symbols from an alphabet $\\Sigma$. The two-dimensional automaton model was introduced by Blum and Hewitt~\\cite{BlumHewitt19672DAutomata}.\n\nThe standard definition of a two-dimensional automaton, in which the input head is allowed to move in four directions through its input word, gives rise to a very powerful model of computation; indeed, two-dimensional automata are Turing-equivalent. Unfortunately, this computational power means that many common decision problems we can ask about this model are rendered undecidable. For this reason, we can restrict the model in certain ways: by preventing the input head of a two-dimensional automaton from moving upward or leftward. In the case where the input head cannot move upward, the model is called a three-way two-dimensional automaton; when the input head can move neither upward nor leftward, the model is called a two-way two-dimensional automaton. With these restricted variants of two-dimensional automata, we are able to regain many useful decidability properties.\n\nWe may also define a unary variant of the two-dimensional automaton model. When $\\Sigma$ is a one-letter alphabet, the only interesting property of a two-dimensional input word is its dimension. In this case, we are able to regain even more decidability properties, although the landscape of decidability is still not yet settled for each unary model.\n\nIn this paper, we approach universality from two directions: we study the two-dimensional automaton model itself, which is a universal model of computation; and we study the decision problem of universality, which asks whether a given automaton accepts all input words over a particular alphabet, for unary restricted variants of two-dimensional automata. We also study the related decision problems of equivalence, inclusion, and disjointness for the same models. We prove various decidability and complexity results pertaining to unary two-dimensional automata: we show that the universality, equivalence, and inclusion problems are \\co\\NP-hard for the unary three-way deterministic model; the universality, equivalence, inclusion, and disjointness problems are in \\P\\ for the unary two-way deterministic model; the universality, equivalence, and inclusion problems for the unary two-way nondeterministic model are \\coNP-hard and in \\ELEMENTARY; and the disjointness problem for the same model is \\NL-hard and in \\ELEMENTARY. We also consider the long-standing problem of decidability of the unary three-way nondeterministic universality problem; while we do not resolve the question in full, we establish a positive result for a bounded variant of this problem and show that it is \\co\\NP-complete.\n\n%%%%%%\n\n\\section{Preliminaries}\\label{sec:preliminaries}\n\nIn this section, we review basic definitions and results to be used in this paper. For further details about two-dimensional formal languages and automata, see the survey articles of Giammarresi and Restivo~\\cite{GiammarresiRestivo19972DLanguages} and of Inoue and Takanami~\\cite{Inoue19912DAutomataSurvey}, the book of Rosenfeld~\\cite{Rosenfeld1979PictureLanguages}, or the past work of the author~\\cite{Smith2019TwoDimensionalAutomata,Smith2021PhDThesis}.\n\nA two-dimensional word is a finite array of cells, each labelled by a symbol from a finite alphabet $\\Sigma$. If a two-dimensional word $W$ consists of $m \\geq 1$ rows and $n \\geq 1$ columns, then we say it has dimension $m \\times n$, and we may index into row $i$ and column $j$ by writing $W[i,j]$. By convention, we take $W[0, 0]$ to be the top-left corner of $W$ and we take $W[m-1, n-1]$ to be the bottom-right corner of $W$. For a unary alphabet $\\Sigma = \\{\\texttt{a}\\}$, we represent a two-dimensional word having dimension $m \\times n$ as $\\texttt{a}^{m \\times n}$. We denote the special language of all two-dimensional words over $\\Sigma$ having $m \\geq 1$ rows and $n \\geq 1$ columns by the notation $\\Sigma^{++}$.\n\nWhen a two-dimensional word is given as input to a model of computation (i.e., written to an input tape), we label the cells around the two-dimensional word by a special boundary marker $\\texttt{\\#} \\not\\in \\Sigma$. Perhaps the simplest model of computation used to process two-dimensional words is the two-dimensional automaton, which has a finite-state control and is capable of moving its input head in four directions through its input: up, down, left, and right (denoted $U$, $D$, $L$, and $R$, respectively). Without loss of generality, we may assume that the two-dimensional automaton begins its computation on an input word $W$ with its input head positioned at $W[0, 0]$. If the input head encounters a boundary marker \\texttt{\\#}, then we may assume it automatically returns to the input word from the border by undoing whatever previous move it made. We assume that a two-dimensional automaton accepts by entering a designated accepting state, $q_{\\text{accept}}$, and that it halts and accepts immediately upon entering $q_{\\text{accept}}$. Taking all of this together gives us the formal definition of our chosen model of computation.\n\n\\begin{definition}[Deterministic two-dimensional automaton]\\label{def:2DFA4W}\nA deterministic two-dimensional automaton (\\TDFA) is a tuple $(Q, \\Sigma, \\delta, q_{0}, q_{\\text{accept}})$, where $Q$ is a finite set of states, $\\Sigma$ is the input alphabet (with $\\texttt{\\#} \\not\\in \\Sigma$ acting as a boundary marker), $\\delta \\from (Q \\setminus \\{q_{\\text{accept}}\\}) \\times (\\Sigma \\cup \\{\\texttt{\\#}\\}) \\to Q \\times \\{U, D, L, R\\}$ is the partial transition function, and $q_{0}, q_{\\text{accept}} \\in Q$ are the initial and accepting states, respectively.\n\\end{definition}\n\nWe can modify a two-dimensional automaton to be nondeterministic (\\TNFA) in the usual way by changing the transition function to map to the power set $2^{Q \\times \\{U, D, L, R\\}}$. A two-dimensional automaton $\\mathcal{A}$ is said to be unary if $|\\Sigma| = 1$. In this case, the only property of an input word the automaton is capable of recognizing is its dimension $m \\times n$, so we can identify a unary two-dimensional language $L(\\mathcal{A})$ by way of its accepted dimension set $D(\\mathcal{A}) = \\{(m,n) \\in \\mathbb{N}_{>0} \\times \\mathbb{N}_{>0} \\mid \\texttt{a}^{m \\times n} \\in L(\\mathcal{A})\\}$, where the notation $\\mathbb{N}_{>0}$ denotes the set $\\mathbb{N} \\setminus \\{0\\}$. If a two-dimensional automaton is unary, we append to its notation the suffix \\textsf{-1$\\Sigma$}.\n\nThe suffix \\textsf{-4W} in the previous notation indicates that our two-dimensional automata are ``four-way\" automata; that is, they may move their input heads in any of the four directions $\\{U, D, L, R\\}$. By restricting the movement of the input head, we obtain a number of restricted variants of the two-dimensional automaton model.\n\n\\begin{definition}[Three-way two-dimensional automaton]\\label{def:2DFA3W}\nA three-way two-dimensional automaton (\\TDFATW/\\TNFATW) is a tuple $(Q, \\Sigma, \\delta, q_{0}, q_{\\text{accept}})$ as in Definition~\\ref{def:2DFA4W}, where the transition function $\\delta$ is restricted to use only the directions $\\{D, L, R\\}$.\n\\end{definition}\n\n\\begin{definition}[Two-way two-dimensional automaton]\\label{def:2DFA2W}\nA two-way two-dimensional automaton (\\TDFATWOW/\\TNFATWOW) is a tuple $(Q, \\Sigma, \\delta, q_{0}, q_{\\text{accept}})$ as in Definition~\\ref{def:2DFA4W}, where the transition function $\\delta$ is restricted to use only the directions $\\{D, R\\}$.\n\\end{definition}\n\nBoth the three-way and two-way two-dimensional automaton variants can be either deterministic or nondeterministic, depending on their transition function $\\delta$. Since its input head movements are restricted, if a three-way two-dimensional automaton reads a boundary marker after making a downward move, it can read only boundary markers for the remainder of its computation; the same applies if a two-way two-dimensional automaton reads a boundary marker after making either a downward or a rightward move.\n\nIt is known that (four-way) two-dimensional automata can, in some sense, simulate one-dimensional Turing machines~\\cite{BlumSakoda1977CapabilityFiniteAutomata}; this is achieved by modelling a two-dimensional automaton as a two-counter machine and using the known result that two-counter machines are Turing-equivalent~\\cite{Minsky1967Computation}. Additionally, unlike with typical (one-dimensional) finite automata, deterministic two-dimensional automata are strictly weaker than nondeterministic two-dimensional automata~\\cite{BlumHewitt19672DAutomata}. As one might expect, introducing greater restrictions limits the recognition power of a two-dimensional automaton, so that the three-way model is strictly weaker than the four-way model~\\cite{Rosenfeld1979PictureLanguages} and, likewise, the two-way model is strictly weaker than the three-way model.\n\nThis paper considers common decision problems one may ask about a two-dimensional automaton $\\mathcal{A}$ and its language $L(\\mathcal{A})$. In addition to the membership problem (given an automaton $\\mathcal{A}$ and an input word $W$, is $W \\in L(\\mathcal{A})$?) and the emptiness problem (is $L(\\mathcal{A}) = \\emptyset$?), we focus on the decision problems of universality (is $L(\\mathcal{A}) = \\Sigma^{++}$?), equivalence (is $L(\\mathcal{A}) = L(\\mathcal{B})$ for some other given automaton $\\mathcal{B}$?), inclusion (is $L(\\mathcal{A}) \\subseteq L(\\mathcal{B})$?), and disjointness (is $L(\\mathcal{A}) \\cap L(\\mathcal{B}) = \\emptyset$?). For unary two-dimensional automata, we may translate each of the definitions of these decision problems to use accepted dimension sets instead of languages without too much effort.\n\n%\\begin{tabular}{c | c c}\n%\t\t\t\t& \\TDFA\t\t& \\TNFA \\\\\n%\\hline\n%membership\t\t& \\cmark\t& \\cmark \\\\\n%emptiness\t\t& \\xmark\t& \\xmark \\\\\n%universality\t& \\xmark\t& \\xmark \\\\\n%equivalence\t& \\xmark\t& \\xmark \\\\\n%inclusion\t\t& \\xmark\t& \\xmark \\\\\n%disjointness\t& \\xmark\t& \\xmark \\\\\n%\\end{tabular}\n\n\\begin{table}\n\\centering\n\\begin{tabular}{c | p{2.75cm} p{2.75cm} p{2.75cm} p{2.75cm}}\n\t\t\t\t& \\TDFATW\t& \\TNFATW\t& \\TDFATWOW\t& \\TNFATWOW \\\\\n\\hline\nmembership\t\t& \\cmark\t& \\cmark\t& \\cmark\t& \\cmark \\\\\nemptiness\t\t& \\cmark\t& \\cmark\t& \\cmark\t& \\cmark \\\\\nuniversality\t& \\cmark\t& \\xmark\t& \\cmark\t& \\xmark \\\\\nequivalence\t\t& \\textbf{?}& \\xmark\t& \\cmark\t& \\xmark \\\\\ninclusion\t\t& \\xmark\t& \\xmark\t& \\cmark\t& \\xmark \\\\\ndisjointness\t& \\xmark\t& \\xmark\t& \\cmark\t& \\textbf{?} \\\\\n\\end{tabular}\n\\caption{Decidability results for restricted two-dimensional automaton models.}\n\\label{tab:2Ddecidability}\n\\end{table}\n\n%\\begin{tabular}{c | c c}\n%\t\t\t\t& \\TDFAOS\t& \\TNFAOS \\\\\n%\\hline\n%membership\t\t& \\cmark\t& \\cmark \\\\\n%emptiness\t\t& \\xmark\t& \\xmark \\\\\n%universality\t& \\xmark\t& \\xmark \\\\\n%equivalence\t& \\xmark\t& \\xmark \\\\\n%inclusion\t\t& \\xmark\t& \\xmark \\\\\n%disjointness\t& \\xmark\t& \\xmark \\\\\n%\\end{tabular}\n\n\\begin{table}\n\\centering\n\\begin{tabular}{c | p{2.75cm} p{2.75cm} p{2.75cm} p{2.75cm}}\n\t\t\t\t& \\TDFATWOS\t& \\TNFATWOS\t\t& \\TDFATWOWOS\t& \\TNFATWOWOS \\\\\n\\hline\nmembership\t\t& \\cmark\t& \\cmark\t\t& \\cmark\t\t& \\cmark \\\\\nemptiness\t\t& \\cmark\t& \\cmark\t\t& \\cmark\t\t& \\cmark \\\\\nuniversality\t& \\cmark$_{\\,\\scriptsize{\\ellipsed{\\co\\NP\\text{-hard}}}}$\t& \\dashedell{$\\ast\\,\\,^{\\scriptsize{\\co\\NP}}_{\\scriptsize{\\co\\NP\\text{-hard}}}$}\t& \\cmark$^{\\,\\scriptsize{\\ellipsed{\\P}}}$\t\t& \\ellipsed{\\cmark$\\,^{\\scriptsize{\\ELEMENTARY}}_{\\scriptsize{\\co\\NP\\text{-hard}}}$} \\\\\nequivalence\t\t& \\cmark$_{\\,\\scriptsize{\\ellipsed{\\co\\NP\\text{-hard}}}}$\t& \\textbf{?}\t& \\cmark$^{\\,\\scriptsize{\\ellipsed{\\P}}}$\t\t& \\ellipsed{\\cmark$\\,^{\\scriptsize{\\ELEMENTARY}}_{\\scriptsize{\\co\\NP\\text{-hard}}}$} \\\\\ninclusion\t\t& \\cmark$_{\\,\\scriptsize{\\ellipsed{\\co\\NP\\text{-hard}}}}$\t& \\textbf{?}\t& \\cmark$^{\\,\\scriptsize{\\ellipsed{\\P}}}$\t\t& \\ellipsed{\\cmark$\\,^{\\scriptsize{\\ELEMENTARY}}_{\\scriptsize{\\co\\NP\\text{-hard}}}$} \\\\\ndisjointness\t& \\cmark\t& \\textbf{?}\t& \\cmark$^{\\,\\scriptsize{\\ellipsed{\\P}}}$\t\t& \\ellipsed{\\cmark$\\,^{\\scriptsize{\\ELEMENTARY}}_{\\scriptsize{\\NL\\text{-hard}}}$} \\\\\n\\end{tabular}\n\\caption{Decidability results for unary restricted two-dimensional automaton models. New results presented in this paper are circled. A partial result presented in this paper is dash-circled. Superscripts indicate upper bounds. Subscripts indicate lower bounds.}\n\\label{tab:2Dunarydecidability}\n\\end{table}\n\nIn terms of decidability properties, (four-way) two-dimensional automata present nothing of particular interest; indeed, only the membership problem is decidable for this model. Thus, here we focus on the restricted variants of two-dimensional automata, which admit some more positive decidability results. Known decidability results are summarized in Table~\\ref{tab:2Ddecidability} for general alphabets and in Table~\\ref{tab:2Dunarydecidability} for unary alphabets, where \\cmark\\ denotes a decidable problem and \\xmark\\ denotes an undecidable problem. (The asterisk $\\ast$ denotes a positive decidability result for a special bounded case discussed in Section~\\ref{sec:3Wnondetbounded}; the general entry remains \\textbf{?}.)\n\nOf the decision problems known to be decidable for restricted two-dimensional automaton models, the complexity of deciding these problems has been studied in part. Since testing membership is essentially a reachability problem, the deterministic membership problem is \\L-complete while the nondeterministic version is \\NL-complete~\\cite{Lindgren1998Complexity2DPatterns}. The \\TNFATWOS\\ emptiness problem is \\NP-complete~\\cite{SmithSalomaa20212D3WProperties}, and an upper bound of \\NP\\ follows for the \\TDFATWOS\\ emptiness problem. In the two-way case, the \\TNFATWOW\\ emptiness problem is in \\P~\\cite{SmithSalomaa20212D3WProperties}, and so this same bound transfers over to the \\TNFATWOWOS\\ and \\TDFATWOWOS\\ emptiness problems.\n\n%%%%%%\n\n\\section{Unary Three-Way Deterministic Lower Bounds}\\label{sec:3Wlowerbound}\n\nAs Table~\\ref{tab:2Dunarydecidability} observes, the problems of universality, equivalence, and inclusion are all known to be decidable for unary three-way deterministic two-dimensional automata. The decidability of the universality problem was established by Inoue and Takanami~\\cite{InoueTakanami1980DecisionProblems2DAutomata}. The decidability of both the equivalence and the inclusion problems was established by Kinber~\\cite{Kinber1985ThreeWayAutomataOneLetter}. Here, we consider the complexity of each of these decision problems for this model.\n\nIt is well known that Karp~\\cite{Karp1972Reducibility} established the \\NP-completeness of \\textsc{3-CNF-Sat}: given a Boolean formula $\\phi$ in conjunctive normal form, where each clause contains at most three literals, determine whether $\\phi$ is satisfiable. As a consequence, the complementary problem \\textsc{3-CNF-Unsat} is \\co\\NP-complete. We will use this fact to establish the following theorem giving a lower bound on the complexity of the \\TDFATWOS\\ universality problem.\n\n\\begin{theorem}\\label{thm:unary2DFA3Wuniversality}\nThe universality problem for three-way deterministic two-dimensional automata over a unary alphabet is \\co\\NP-hard.\n\n\\begin{proof}\nWe prove this theorem via a reduction from \\textsc{3-CNF-Unsat}. Let $\\phi = C_{1} \\wedge \\dots \\wedge C_{s}$ be a Boolean formula in conjunctive normal form with at most three literals per clause, and suppose the variables appearing in $\\phi$ are $x_{1}, \\dots, x_{t}$. Enumerate the first $t$ prime numbers $p_{1}, \\dots, p_{t}$, and associate to each variable $x_{i}$ the $i$th prime number $p_{i}$ in this enumeration. By the prime number theorem, we know that $p_{t} \\sim t\\log(t)$, so $p_{i} \\leq p_{t} \\in O(t\\log(t))$ for all $i \\leq t$; in other terms, all primes in the enumeration are polynomially bounded in $t$.\n\nWe construct a unary three-way deterministic two-dimensional automaton $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$. Given an input word $W$ of dimension $m \\times n$, we interpret the number of columns $n$ as an encoding of an assignment of truth values to variables:\n\\begin{equation*}\nx_{i} = \n\\begin{cases}\n\\text{false},\t& \\text{if } n \\equiv 0 \\bmod p_{i}; \\\\\n\\text{true},\t& \\text{if } n \\equiv 1 \\bmod p_{i}.\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation*}\nLet $(\\lambda_{1}, \\dots, \\lambda_{\\ell})$ be a list of occurrences of literals in $\\phi$ listed clause-by-clause, and record in the finite-state control of $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ which literals end each clause. By our truth value assignment, a positive literal $x_{i}$ is false when $n \\equiv 0 \\bmod p_{i}$, while a negative literal $\\neg x_{i}$ is false when $n \\equiv 1 \\bmod p_{i}$.\n\nThe automaton $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ begins by computing the residue for each literal occurrence on the fly. If the current literal $\\lambda_{c}$ uses variable $x_{i}$, then on the row of the input word corresponding to $\\lambda_{c}$, $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ moves from one boundary to the other while cycling through states $r_{0}^{i}, r_{1}^{i}, \\dots, r_{p_{i} - 1}^{i}$. Each time the input head makes a leftward or rightward move and reads the unary alphabet symbol \\texttt{a}, $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ transitions from state $r_{j}^{i}$ to state $r_{j + 1 \\bmod p_{i}}^{i}$. Upon reaching the end of the row, $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ knows the value of $n \\bmod p_{i}$; if $n \\bmod p_{i} \\not\\in \\{0, 1\\}$, then $n$ does not encode an assignment of truth values and $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ defaults to accepting.\n\nThen, $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ uses the sign of $\\lambda_{c}$ stored in its finite-state control to determine whether $\\lambda_{c}$ is true under the encoded assignment. The automaton stores in its finite-state control a flag value that is initialized to be false at the beginning of each clause, indicating whether some literal checked so far in that clause is true and updating if necessary after reading each row. If $\\lambda_{c}$ is the last literal in the current clause and the flag remains false, then that clause is falsified and $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ accepts. Otherwise, if $\\lambda_{c}$ is the last literal in the current clause and the flag is true, then $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ resets the flag to be false and proceeds to the next clause. If all clauses are satisfied, then $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ enters a dead state and does not accept.\n\nAltogether, $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ requires one row in its input word for each literal occurrence. If the input word consists of fewer than $T = \\ell$ rows, then $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ will reach the bottom boundary prematurely and default to accepting.\n\nWe now prove correctness.\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item Suppose $\\phi$ is an unsatisfiable formula, and let $W$ be a unary two-dimensional input word of dimension $m \\times n$. If $m < T$, then $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ accepts. Likewise, if $m \\geq T$ and $n$ is not a valid assignment encoding, then $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ accepts. Otherwise, $m \\geq T$ and $n$ is a valid assignment encoding. Since $\\phi$ is unsatisfiable, this assignment encoding falsifies at least one clause, and when $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ checks the first such falsified clause, it accepts. Therefore, every unary two-dimensional input word is accepted, and $L(\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi})$ is universal.\n\n\\item Suppose $\\phi$ is a satisfiable formula, and let $\\sigma$ denote a satisfying assignment of truth values to variables. For each $i$, let\n\\begin{equation*}\nb_{i} = \n\\begin{cases}\n0,\t\t& \\text{if } \\sigma(x_{i}) = \\text{false}; \\\\\n1,\t\t& \\text{if } \\sigma(x_{i}) = \\text{true}.\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation*}\nSince each of $p_{1}, \\dots, p_{t}$ is pairwise coprime, by the Chinese remainder theorem, we know that there exists a positive integer $n$ such that $n \\equiv b_{i} \\bmod p_{i}$ for each $i$. Choose any $m \\geq T$. Then, in the corresponding unary two-dimensional input word of dimension $m \\times n$, $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ will never accept. Thus, $L(\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi})$ is not universal.\n\\end{itemize}\nSince \\textsc{3-CNF-Unsat} is \\co\\NP-complete and we can construct $\\mathcal{A}_{\\phi}$ using $O(\\ell \\cdot t\\log(t))$ states in time polynomial in $|\\phi|$, testing universality is \\co\\NP-hard.\n\\end{proof}\n\\end{theorem}\n\nFrom Theorem~\\ref{thm:unary2DFA3Wuniversality}, we obtain similar lower bounds for the \\TDFATWOS\\ equivalence and inclusion problems.\n\n\\begin{corollary}\\label{cor:unary2DFA3Wequivalenceinclusion}\nThe equivalence and inclusion problems for three-way deterministic two-dimensional automata over a unary alphabet are \\co\\NP-hard.\n\n\\begin{proof}\nLet $\\Sigma$ be a unary alphabet. We can construct a unary three-way deterministic two-dimensional automaton $\\mathcal{U}$ recognizing $\\Sigma^{++}$ in a straightforward manner: after reading the first input symbol, $\\mathcal{U}$ transitions immediately to $q_{\\text{accept}}$. By Theorem~\\ref{thm:unary2DFA3Wuniversality}, we know that testing universality is \\co\\NP-hard.\n\nGiven a unary three-way deterministic two-dimensional automaton $\\mathcal{A}$, construct a pair $(\\mathcal{A}, \\mathcal{U})$. Then deciding whether $L(\\mathcal{A})$ is universal is at least as hard as deciding whether $L(\\mathcal{A}) = L(\\mathcal{U})$. Since $\\mathcal{U}$ is fixed and constructing the pair $(\\mathcal{A}, \\mathcal{U})$ can be done in polynomial time, testing equivalence is \\co\\NP-hard.\n\nSimilarly, given $\\mathcal{A}$ as before, construct a pair $(\\mathcal{U}, \\mathcal{A})$. Then deciding whether $L(\\mathcal{A})$ is universal is at least as hard as deciding whether $L(\\mathcal{U}) \\subseteq L(\\mathcal{A})$. Again, since $\\mathcal{U}$ is fixed and constructing the pair $(\\mathcal{U}, \\mathcal{A})$ can be done in polynomial time, testing inclusion is \\co\\NP-hard.\n\\end{proof}\n\\end{corollary}\n\nNote that we cannot apply the same logic to argue that testing \\TDFATWOS\\ emptiness or disjointness is \\co\\NP-hard. While this model is closed under complement, meaning we may test emptiness by way of testing complement-universality, there is no known polynomial-time construction to produce a polynomial-size unary three-way deterministic two-dimensional automaton for $\\overline{L(\\mathcal{A})}$, and testing disjointness is fundamentally a question of testing emptiness instead of universality.\n\n%%%%%%\n\n\\section[Unary Three-Way Nondeterministic Results for Bounded-Size Inputs]{Unary Three-Way Nondeterministic Results for\\\\Bounded-Size Inputs}\\label{sec:3Wnondetbounded}\n\nWe now move on to considering the universality problem in the unary three-way nondeterministic case. For general alphabets, it is known that universality is undecidable~\\cite{InoueTakanami1980DecisionProblems2DAutomata}, but the question remains unresolved for unary alphabets. Here, we do not attempt to resolve the question entirely, but instead we obtain a partial positive result by establishing decidability for a bounded variant of the universality problem.\n\nFor finite sets $R, C \\subseteq \\mathbb{N}_{>0}$, let $D_{R, C} = (R \\times \\mathbb{N}_{>0}) \\cup (\\mathbb{N}_{>0} \\times C)$ denote the domain of all two-dimensional words having dimension $r \\times \\mathbb{N}_{>0}$ for $r \\in R$ or having dimension $\\mathbb{N}_{>0} \\times c$ for $c \\in C$.\n\nAs the first step toward obtaining our partial positive decidability result, we must develop two reductions depending on which dimension we choose to fix: the number of columns or the number of rows.\n\n\\paragraph{Fixed columns.} Fix a value $c \\geq 1$. Define the fixed-column-universality problem to be as follows: given a unary three-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automaton $\\mathcal{A}$ over the alphabet $\\Sigma = \\{\\texttt{a}\\}$, does $\\texttt{a}^{m \\times c} \\in L(\\mathcal{A})$ for all $m \\geq 1$?\n\nThe following lemma allows us to reduce this problem to an equivalent problem framed in terms of a unary nondeterministic finite automaton (in one dimension), which will then enable us to use well-known properties of this model in establishing the main theorem of the section.\n\n\\begin{lemma}\\label{lem:fixedcolumn}\nFor every unary three-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automaton $\\mathcal{A}$ and for all $c \\geq 1$, we can construct a unary nondeterministic finite automaton $\\mathcal{B}_{\\mathcal{A},c}$ over the alphabet $\\Gamma = \\{\\texttt{b}\\}$ such that, for all $m \\geq 1$, $\\texttt{b}^{m} \\in L(\\mathcal{B}_{\\mathcal{A},c})$ if and only if $\\texttt{a}^{m \\times c} \\in L(\\mathcal{A})$.\n\n\\begin{proof}\nTake a row-entry configuration to be a pair $(q, j)$, where $q \\neq q_{\\text{accept}}$ is a state of $\\mathcal{A}$ and $j \\in \\{0, 1, \\dots, c + 1\\}$ is the column in which the input head enters that particular row in state $q$. Column numbers $0$ and $c + 1$ represent the left and right boundary columns, respectively.\n\nObserve that, since $c$ is fixed, there are finitely many row-entry configurations. Thus, we may build a graph describing all input head movement within a given row. The vertices of this graph are labelled by pairs of states of $\\mathcal{A}$ and a column number from the set $\\{0, 1, \\dots, c + 1\\}$. Edges between vertices indicate leftward and rightward moves within the row.\n\nTo indicate downward moves from one row to another, define a relation $\\rightsquigarrow_{c}$ on row-entry configurations in the following way: $(q, j) \\rightsquigarrow_{c} (r, j')$ if, starting in a state $q$ and column $j$ of a row with $c$ columns, $\\mathcal{A}$ makes a finite number of leftward and rightward moves within that row before making its first downward move into the next row at column $j'$, where it transitions to state $r$. Since each row-entry configuration graph is finite, we may compute the relation $\\rightsquigarrow_{c}$ using standard reachability techniques.\n\nAdditionally, define two finite sets: $F_{c}$, consisting of all row-entry configurations from which $\\mathcal{A}$ can accept before making a downward move; and $G_{c}$, consisting of all row-entry configurations from which $\\mathcal{A}$ can accept if the current row is the last row (i.e., if the next downward move reaches the bottom boundary of the input word).\n\nWe can now construct the unary nondeterministic finite automaton $\\mathcal{B}_{\\mathcal{A},c}$. Each state in the state set of $\\mathcal{B}_{\\mathcal{A},c}$ is labelled by a row-entry configuration. The initial state corresponds to the row-entry configuration $(q_{0}, 1)$. We also add one accepting sink state $q_{\\text{s}}$ that loops on \\texttt{b}, and one standard accepting state $q_{\\text{a}}$ with no outgoing transitions. For each $q \\rightsquigarrow_{c} r$, add a transition $r \\in \\delta(q, \\texttt{b})$. If $q \\in F_{c}$, then also add a transition $q_{\\text{s}} \\in \\delta(q, \\texttt{b})$. Lastly, if $q \\in G_{c}$, then also add a transition $q_{\\text{a}} \\in \\delta(q, \\texttt{b})$.\n\nAfter reading $i$ input symbols without entering either $q_{\\text{s}}$ or $q_{\\text{a}}$, the reachable states of $\\mathcal{B}_{\\mathcal{A},c}$ correspond to the row-entry configurations in which $\\mathcal{A}$ can enter row $i + 1$. Therefore, for each $m \\geq 1$, $\\mathcal{B}_{\\mathcal{A},c}$ accepts the input word $\\texttt{b}^{m}$ if and only if $\\mathcal{A}$ accepts the input word $\\texttt{a}^{m \\times c}$.\n\\end{proof}\n\\end{lemma}\n\n\\paragraph{Fixed rows.} Fix a value $r \\geq 1$. Define the fixed-row-universality problem to be as follows: given a unary three-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automaton $\\mathcal{A}$ over the alphabet $\\Sigma = \\{\\texttt{a}\\}$, does $\\texttt{a}^{r \\times n} \\in L(\\mathcal{A})$ for all $n \\geq 1$?\n\nAgain, the following lemma reduces this problem to an equivalent problem for another, more well-known computational model. While Lemma~\\ref{lem:fixedcolumn} made use of a (one-way) nondeterministic finite automaton to traverse two-dimensional rows in the downward direction, here we must use a two-way nondeterministic finite automaton to move leftward and rightward between two-dimensional columns.\n\n\\begin{lemma}\\label{lem:fixedrow}\nFor every unary three-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automaton $\\mathcal{A}$ and for all $r \\geq 1$, we can construct a unary two-way nondeterministic finite automaton $\\mathcal{C}_{\\mathcal{A},r}$ over the alphabet $\\Gamma = \\{\\texttt{c}\\}$ such that, for all $n \\geq 1$, $\\texttt{c}^{n} \\in L(\\mathcal{C}_{\\mathcal{A},r})$ if and only if $\\texttt{a}^{r \\times n} \\in L(\\mathcal{A})$.\n\n\\begin{proof}\nWe construct the unary two-way nondeterministic finite automaton $\\mathcal{C}_{\\mathcal{A},r}$ in the following way. Given an input word of length $n$, the position of the input head of $\\mathcal{C}_{\\mathcal{A},r}$ represents the current column being read by $\\mathcal{A}$. If the input head of $\\mathcal{C}_{\\mathcal{A},r}$ reads either the left or the right endmarker of its input word, then this is interpreted as $\\mathcal{A}$ reading a boundary marker \\texttt{\\#}. The finite-state control of $\\mathcal{C}_{\\mathcal{A},r}$ keeps track of both the current state of $\\mathcal{A}$ and a row number from the set $\\{1, \\dots, r, \\bot\\}$, where $\\bot$ represents the bottom boundary row. Again, if the row value is $\\bot$, then this is interpreted as $\\mathcal{A}$ reading a boundary marker \\texttt{\\#}.\n\nIf the input head of $\\mathcal{A}$ moves leftward or rightward, then $\\mathcal{C}_{\\mathcal{A},r}$ simulates this by moving its input head in the same direction. If $\\mathcal{A}$ moves downward, then $\\mathcal{C}_{\\mathcal{A},r}$ does not move its input head, but does increment the row value stored in its finite-state control if it is less than $r$ or updates it to $\\bot$ if it is equal to $r$.\n\nLastly, if $\\mathcal{A}$ enters its accepting state $q_{\\text{accept}}$, then $\\mathcal{C}_{\\mathcal{A},r}$ likewise accepts. Since the simulation performed by $\\mathcal{C}_{\\mathcal{A},r}$ simulates the states and input word indices visited by $\\mathcal{A}$, $\\mathcal{C}_{\\mathcal{A},r}$ accepts the input word $\\texttt{c}^{n}$ if and only if $\\mathcal{A}$ accepts the input word $\\texttt{a}^{r \\times n}$.\n\\end{proof}\n\\end{lemma}\n\nOne may now be able to recognize that, by combining multiple instances of the fixed-column-universality problem (for various values of $c$) and the fixed-row-universality problem (for various values of $r$), we can obtain the aforementioned bounded variant of the universality problem for the unary three-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automaton model. We will refer to this as the $D_{R, C}$-universality problem, following the notation we introduced at the beginning of this section.\n\nIt is known that the universality problem for unary nondeterministic finite automata\\footnote{Note that, in Section~\\ref{sec:preliminaries}, we assumed each two-dimensional word contains at least one row and one column, while in one dimension, a universal finite automaton $\\mathcal{M}$ accepts the empty word $\\epsilon$. We account for this edge case by applying a preprocessing step that simulates $\\mathcal{M}$ on nonempty input words and handles $\\epsilon$ separately.} is \\co\\NP-complete; this result is due to Stockmeyer and Meyer~\\cite{StockmeyerMeyer1973WordProblems}. Likewise, the universality problem for unary two-way nondeterministic finite automata is \\co\\NP-complete. Galil~\\cite{Galil1976HierarchiesCompleteProblems} proved that the nonemptiness problem for unary two-way nondeterministic finite automata is in \\NP, and since testing nonemptiness is equivalent to testing nonuniversality of the complement language, we can use a polynomial-size construction of Geffert, Mereghetti, and Pighizzini~\\cite{Geffert2007ComplementingTwoWay} to obtain the complement unary language; hardness follows by the aforementioned one-way nondeterministic finite automaton result. Combining these facts with Lemma~\\ref{lem:fixedcolumn} and Lemma~\\ref{lem:fixedrow}, we obtain the following theorem.\n\n\\begin{theorem}\\label{thm:DRCuniversalitycoNPcomplete}\nThe $D_{R, C}$-universality problem for three-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automata over a unary alphabet is \\co\\NP-complete for every fixed finite $R, C \\subseteq \\mathbb{N}_{>0}$, or when finite sets $R, C \\subseteq \\mathbb{N}_{>0}$ are given in unary as part of the input.\n\n\\begin{proof}\nLet $\\mathcal{A}$ be a unary three-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automaton. For each $c \\in C$, construct a unary nondeterministic finite automaton $\\mathcal{B}_{\\mathcal{A}, c}$ as in the proof of Lemma~\\ref{lem:fixedcolumn}. Likewise, for each $r \\in R$, construct a unary two-way nondeterministic finite automaton $\\mathcal{C}_{\\mathcal{A}, r}$ as in the proof of Lemma~\\ref{lem:fixedrow}. If $R$ and $C$ are provided in unary encoding, then we can construct this family of automata in time polynomial in the length of the input. Moreover, $L(\\mathcal{A})$ is $D_{R, C}$-universal if and only if $\\mathcal{B}_{\\mathcal{A}, c}$ is universal for all $c \\in C$ and $\\mathcal{C}_{\\mathcal{A}, r}$ is universal for all $r \\in R$.\n\nSince the universality problem for unary nondeterministic finite automata (as well as that of the two-way variant) is in \\co\\NP, the nonuniversality of either $\\mathcal{B}_{\\mathcal{A}, c}$ or $\\mathcal{C}_{\\mathcal{A}, r}$ is witnessed by a polynomial-size \\NP\\ certificate. Thus, the $D_{R, C}$-nonuniversality problem is in \\NP, and so the $D_{R, C}$-universality problem is in \\co\\NP.\n\nWe establish hardness via a reduction from the universality problem for unary nondeterministic finite automata. Let $\\mathcal{M}$ be a unary nondeterministic finite automaton. We construct a unary three-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automaton $\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{M}}$ with the property that $L(\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{M}})$ is $D_{R, C}$-universal if and only if $L(\\mathcal{M})$ is universal.\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item Suppose $R \\neq \\emptyset$, and choose some $r_{0} \\in R$. Given an arbitrary input word $\\texttt{a}^{m \\times n}$, $\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{M}}$ ignores the number of rows $m$ and simulates the computation of $\\mathcal{M}$ on the input word $\\texttt{a}^{n}$. Then, $\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{M}}$ accepts $\\texttt{a}^{m \\times n}$ if and only if $\\mathcal{M}$ accepts $\\texttt{a}^{n}$. If $L(\\mathcal{M})$ is not universal, then there exists some $n_{0} \\geq 1$ such that $\\texttt{a}^{n_{0}} \\not\\in L(\\mathcal{M})$; this means that $\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{M}}$ rejects the input word $\\texttt{a}^{r_{0} \\times n_{0}}$, and so $L(\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{M}})$ is not $D_{R, C}$-universal.\n\n\\item Suppose $R = \\emptyset$ but $C \\neq \\emptyset$, and choose some $c_{0} \\in C$. Given an arbitrary input word $\\texttt{a}^{m \\times n}$, $\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{M}}$ first checks whether $n \\neq c_{0}$ and, if this is the case, $\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{M}}$ accepts. Otherwise, if $n = c_{0}$, then $\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{M}}$ simulates the computation of $\\mathcal{M}$ on the input word $\\texttt{a}^{m}$ and accepts at the bottom boundary if and only if $\\mathcal{M}$ accepts. If $L(\\mathcal{M})$ is not universal, then there exists some $m_{0} \\geq 1$ such that $\\texttt{a}^{m_{0}} \\not\\in L(\\mathcal{M})$; this means that $\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{M}}$ rejects the input word $\\texttt{a}^{m_{0} \\times c_{0}}$, and so $L(\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{M}})$ is not $D_{R, C}$-universal.\n\\end{itemize}\nSince the universality problem for unary nondeterministic finite automata is \\co\\NP-complete and we can reduce from this problem to the $D_{R, C}$-universality problem, testing $D_{R, C}$-universality is \\co\\NP-hard.\n\\end{proof}\n\\end{theorem}\n\n%%%%%%\n\n\\section{Unary Two-Way Results}\\label{sec:2W}\n\nWhen considering the two-way two-dimensional automaton model, it will be beneficial for us to recall a definition from the literature that will allow us to simplify our proofs slightly.\n\n\\begin{definition}[IBR-accepting two-way two-dimensional automaton~\\cite{SmithSalomaa20232DProjection}]\\label{def:IBR}\nAn IBR-accepting two-way two-dimensional automaton $\\mathcal{A}$ is a tuple $(Q, \\Sigma, \\delta, q_{0}, q_{\\text{accept}})$ as in Definition~\\ref{def:2DFA2W} where, when the input head reads a boundary marker \\texttt{\\#}, $\\mathcal{A}$ either enters $q_{\\text{accept}}$ in the next transition or the transition is undefined.\n\\end{definition}\n\nThe abbreviation ``IBR-accepting\" refers to the automaton ``immediately bottom-right accepting\"; by this, we mean that the automaton immediately halts and accepts if, upon reading a boundary marker \\texttt{\\#}, the state $q_{\\text{accept}}$ is reachable from its current state. Every two-way two-dimensional automaton can be converted to an equivalent IBR-accepting automaton of the same size, so throughout this section, when we refer to a two-way two-dimensional automaton, we will assume it is IBR-accepting.\n\n%%%\n\n\\subsection{Deterministic Complexity}\\label{subsec:2DFA2W}\n\nOne may have noted in Table~\\ref{tab:2Ddecidability} that every common decision problem is decidable for two-way deterministic two-dimensional automata over a general alphabet. The \\TDFATWOW\\ emptiness problem can be decided by searching for an input word dimension yielding an accepting computation, and since the model is closed under complement, we obtain a decision procedure for the \\TDFATWOW\\ universality problem as well. Equivalence and inclusion were proved decidable by the author and Salomaa~\\cite{SmithSalomaa20212D3WProperties}, and the author later extended decidability to the disjointness problem~\\cite{Smith2021PhDThesis}. Each of these positive decidability results naturally transfers over to the \\TDFATWOWOS\\ problems.\n\nHere, we extend these results to show that the unary variants of each of these problems can be decided efficiently. This efficiency is achieved by virtue of the simplified behaviour of the transition function over a unary alphabet allowing us to model each decision problem as an integer linear program.\n\n\\begin{theorem}\\label{thm:2DFA2WP}\nThe universality, equivalence, inclusion, and disjointness problems for two-way deterministic two-dimensional automata over a unary alphabet are in \\P.\n\n\\begin{proof}\nLet $\\mathcal{A}$ be a unary two-way deterministic two-dimensional automaton. Since $\\mathcal{A}$ is defined over $\\Sigma = \\{\\texttt{a}\\}$, consider the sequence of states $q_{0}, q_{1}, q_{2}, \\dots$ that arises by repeatedly reading the symbol \\texttt{a}; that is, the sequence produced by computing $\\delta(q_{i}, \\texttt{a}) = (q_{i+1}, X_{i})$, where $X_{i} \\in \\{D, R\\}$, until either $q_{\\text{accept}}$ is reached, a nonaccepting state with no outgoing transition on \\texttt{a} is reached, or a nonaccepting state repeats in the sequence. The sequence of $\\{D, R\\}$ moves is monotone, and since $\\mathcal{A}$ is deterministic, the sequence of states is unique.\n\nFor each transition $i \\geq 0$, let $d_{i} = |\\{j < i \\mid X_{j} = D\\}|$ and $r_{i} = |\\{j < i \\mid X_{j} = R\\}|$ denote the number of downward and rightward moves, respectively, made before transition $i$. Immediately before $\\mathcal{A}$ follows transition $i$, its input head is at row $1 + d_{i}$ and column $1 + r_{i}$ in its input word.\n\nWe classify the sequence of states visited by $\\mathcal{A}$ into one of the following cases and, for each input word of dimension $m \\times n$, we place its dimension $(m, n)$ into an accepting set $A_{\\mathcal{A}}$ or a nonaccepting set $R_{\\mathcal{A}}$ as follows:\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item Suppose the sequence of states eventually reaches $q_{\\text{accept}}$. Let $t$ be the least index such that $q_{t} = q_{\\text{accept}}$ in the sequence. For each $j < t - 1$, we record the input word dimensions $(m, n)$ for which transition $j$ would move the input head of $\\mathcal{A}$ into the bottom or right boundary before reaching $q_{\\text{accept}}$.\n\t\\begin{itemize}\n\t\\item If $X_{j} = D$, then this happens when the input word dimensions satisfy $m = 1 + d_{j}$ and $n \\geq 1 + r_{j}$.\n\t\n\t\\item If $X_{j} = R$, then this happens when the input word dimensions satisfy $m \\geq 1 + d_{j}$ and $n = 1 + r_{j}$.\n\t\\end{itemize}\nWe categorize each case as accepting or rejecting based on the IBR-accepting behaviour of $\\mathcal{A}$ upon reaching the boundary. If $t = 0$, then $\\mathcal{A}$ accepts every input word. Otherwise, all remaining dimensions satisfy $m \\geq 1 + d_{t - 1}$ and $n \\geq 1 + r_{t - 1}$; for input words having these dimensions, $q_{\\text{accept}}$ is reached before the input head encounters a boundary, so $\\mathcal{A}$ accepts and we categorize that dimension into $A_{\\mathcal{A}}$.\n\n\\item Suppose the sequence of states reaches a nonaccepting state with no outgoing transition on \\texttt{a}. Let $t$ be the least index such that $q_{t}$ is the nonaccepting state in question. For each $j < t$, we repeat the same dimension categorization procedure as before. All remaining dimensions satisfy $m \\geq 1 + d_{t}$ and $n \\geq 1 + r_{t}$; for input words having these dimensions, the nonaccepting state $q_{t}$ is reached before the input head encounters a boundary, so $\\mathcal{A}$ does not accept and we categorize that dimension into $R_{\\mathcal{A}}$.\n\n\\item Suppose a nonaccepting state repeats in the sequence. Let $t$ be the least index such that $q_{s} = q_{t}$ for some index $s < t$; the sequence of states up to $q_{s}$ forms a prefix, while the sequence from $q_{s}$ to $q_{t}$ forms a cycle. Iterating this cycle once moves the input head of $\\mathcal{A}$ downward by $D_{0} = d_{t} - d_{s}$ cells and rightward by $R_{0} = r_{t} - r_{s}$ cells; since $\\mathcal{A}$ must move its input head on each transition, at least one of $D_{0}$ and $R_{0}$ is positive. For each $j < s$, we repeat the same dimension categorization procedure as before. For each $s \\leq j < t$, consider the position of the input head after $k \\geq 0$ iterations of the cycle. Immediately before $\\mathcal{A}$ follows transition $j$, its input head has moved downward by $kD_{0} + d_{j}$ cells and rightward by $kR_{0} + r_{j}$ cells, and we record the input word dimensions $(m, n)$ for which transition $j$ would move the input head of $\\mathcal{A}$ into the bottom or right boundary.\n\t\\begin{itemize}\n\t\\item If $X_{j} = D$, then this happens when the input word dimensions satisfy $m = 1 + kD_{0} + d_{j}$ and $n \\geq 1 + kR_{0} + r_{j}$ for $k \\geq 0$.\n\t\n\t\\item If $X_{j} = R$, then this happens when the input word dimensions satisfy $m \\geq 1 + kD_{0} + d_{j}$ and $n = 1 + kR_{0} + r_{j}$ for $k \\geq 0$.\n\t\\end{itemize}\nAgain, we categorize each case as accepting or rejecting based on the IBR-accepting behaviour of $\\mathcal{A}$ upon reaching the boundary.\n\\end{itemize}\nFinally, we take the accepted dimension set $D(\\mathcal{A})$ to be the union of the accepting cases in $A_{\\mathcal{A}}$, and we also construct a `rejected dimension' set $X(\\mathcal{A})$ by taking the union of the rejecting cases in $R_{\\mathcal{A}}$. Since every sequence of states has length at most $|Q|$ before one of our three cases is encountered, our construction is polynomial in $|Q|$.\n\nNow, observe that we can formulate each of our decision problems in terms of these two sets: universality asks whether $X(\\mathcal{A}) = \\emptyset$, equivalence asks whether $(D(\\mathcal{A}) \\cap X(\\mathcal{B})) \\cup (D(\\mathcal{B}) \\cap X(\\mathcal{A})) = \\emptyset$ for some other unary two-way deterministic two-dimensional automaton $\\mathcal{B}$, inclusion asks whether $D(\\mathcal{A}) \\cap X(\\mathcal{B}) = \\emptyset$, and disjointness asks whether $D(\\mathcal{A}) \\cap D(\\mathcal{B}) = \\emptyset$.\n\nSince the sets $A_{\\mathcal{A}}$ and $R_{\\mathcal{A}}$ on which each of these decision problem definitions is predicated are constructed according to a case-based system of linear equalities and inequalities in a fixed number of integer variables (e.g., $m$, $n$, $k$), and since the number of variables is bounded by a constant independent of $\\mathcal{A}$, then we can model each of these decision problems as a type of constraint satisfaction problem. Since an integer linear program with a fixed number of variables can be solved in polynomial time~\\cite{Lenstra1983IntegerProgrammingFixedVariables}, each of these decision problems is in \\P.\n\\end{proof}\n\\end{theorem}\n\n%%%\n\n\\subsection{Nondeterministic Decidability and Complexity}\\label{subsec:2NFA2W}\n\nIn contrast to the deterministic case, and similar to the unary three-way nondeterministic model, the decidability status of the \\TNFATWOWOS\\ universality, equivalence, inclusion, and disjointness problems remained unresolved in the literature. Here, we prove that the unary variants of each of these problems are decidable for the model, and we additionally establish upper and lower complexity bounds for each problem.\n\nUnfortunately, since we are dealing with the nondeterministic model here, we cannot use the same techniques as in Section~\\ref{subsec:2DFA2W} to establish decidability or prove complexity bounds; we could still analyze the sequence of states visited by an automaton in repeatedly reading the same symbol, but this sequence is no longer guaranteed to be unique. Instead, we will analyze a different kind of sequence: since every computation of a two-way two-dimensional automaton consists of some combination of downward and rightward moves, we can study the sequences of moves over $\\{D, R\\}^{*}$ that arise from such a computation and use existing tools to decide each of our problems.\n\nTo begin, we recall a helpful result from the literature, which we present here without proof.\n\n\\begin{proposition}[Ginsburg and Spanier~\\cite{GinsburgSpanier1966PresburgerFormulas}]\\label{prop:semilinearpresburger}\nA set is semilinear if and only if the set is definable in Presburger arithmetic.\n\\end{proposition}\n\nWith this result, we can prove the following technical lemma.\n\n\\begin{lemma}\\label{lem:2NFA2Wpresburger}\nGiven a unary two-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automaton $\\mathcal{A}$ over an alphabet $\\Sigma = \\{\\texttt{a}\\}$, one can obtain a Presburger arithmetic formula $\\phi_{\\mathcal{A}}(m, n)$ such that, for all $m, n \\geq 1$, $\\phi_{\\mathcal{A}}(m, n)$ is true if and only if $\\texttt{a}^{m \\times n} \\in L(\\mathcal{A})$.\n\n\\begin{proof}\nFirst, observe that since we are operating over a unary alphabet, checking whether $\\texttt{a}^{m \\times n} \\in L(\\mathcal{A})$ is equivalent to checking whether $(m, n) \\in D(\\mathcal{A})$.\n\nIf $q_{0} = q_{\\text{accept}}$, then take $\\phi_{\\mathcal{A}}(m, n) = (m \\geq 1 \\wedge n \\geq 1)$. Otherwise, every computation of $\\mathcal{A}$ corresponds to a sequence of moves $v \\in \\{D, R\\}^{*}$, so we may represent computations in terms of the Parikh map of this sequence of moves $\\Psi(v) = (|v|_{D}, |v|_{R})$. If $\\Psi(v) = (d, r)$, then the sequence of moves $v$ has caused the input head of $\\mathcal{A}$ to move $d$ rows downward and $r$ columns rightward within its input word.\n\nWe now classify accepting computations of $\\mathcal{A}$ into one of the following cases:\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item Suppose $\\mathcal{A}$ accepts within the input word. For each accepting transition $e$ of the form $(q_{\\text{accept}}, X) \\in \\delta(p, \\texttt{a})$, where $X \\in \\{D, R\\}$, let $V^{\\text{int}}_{e} \\subseteq \\{D, R\\}^{*}$ denote the set of sequences of moves sending $\\mathcal{A}$ from $q_{0}$ to $p$. Observe that $V^{\\text{int}}_{e}$ is a regular language, so by Parikh's theorem~\\cite{Parikh1966OnCFLs}, its Parikh map $\\Psi(V^{\\text{int}}_{e})$ is semilinear. Then, by Proposition~\\ref{prop:semilinearpresburger}, there exists a Presburger arithmetic formula $\\phi^{\\text{int}}_{e}(d, r)$ that is true if and only if there exists some $v \\in V^{\\text{int}}_{e}$ such that $\\Psi(v) = (d, r)$. The set of all dimensions $(m, n)$ where $\\mathcal{A}$ accepts within the input word having dimension $m \\times n$ is then given by the formula\n\\begin{equation*}\n\\phi^{\\text{int}}(m, n) = \\bigvee_{e} \\exists d \\ \\exists r \\ (\\phi^{\\text{int}}_{e}(d, r) \\wedge m \\geq d + 1 \\wedge n \\geq r + 1).\n\\end{equation*}\n\n\\item Suppose $\\mathcal{A}$ accepts upon reaching the bottom boundary of the input word. The argument is similar to that used in the previous case, except we now consider the set of sequences of moves where the last transition moves the input head of $\\mathcal{A}$ downward into the boundary. In this case, the set of all dimensions $(m, n)$ where $\\mathcal{A}$ accepts at the bottom boundary of the input word having dimension $m \\times n$ is given by the formula\n\\begin{equation*}\n\\phi^{\\text{bot}}(m, n) = \\bigvee_{e} \\exists d \\ \\exists r \\ (\\phi^{\\text{bot}}_{e}(d, r) \\wedge m = d \\wedge n \\geq r + 1).\n\\end{equation*}\n\n\\item Suppose $\\mathcal{A}$ accepts upon reaching the right boundary of the input word. The argument is similar to those used in the previous two cases, except we now consider the set of sequences of moves where the last transition moves the input head of $\\mathcal{A}$ rightward into the boundary. In this case, the set of all dimensions $(m, n)$ where $\\mathcal{A}$ accepts at the right boundary of the input word having dimension $m \\times n$ is given by the formula\n\\begin{equation*}\n\\phi^{\\text{rig}}(m, n) = \\bigvee_{e} \\exists d \\ \\exists r \\ (\\phi^{\\text{rig}}_{e}(d, r) \\wedge m \\geq d + 1 \\wedge n = r).\n\\end{equation*}\n\\end{itemize}\nFinally, we take $\\phi_{\\mathcal{A}}(m, n) = \\phi^{\\text{int}}(m, n) \\vee \\phi^{\\text{bot}}(m, n) \\vee \\phi^{\\text{rig}}(m, n)$.\n\nNow, suppose $\\texttt{a}^{m \\times n} \\in L(\\mathcal{A})$; equivalently, suppose $(m, n) \\in D(\\mathcal{A})$. Since $\\mathcal{A}$ is a two-way two-dimensional automaton, and therefore IBR-accepting, the accepting computation must finish either within the input word, at the bottom boundary, or at the right boundary. In any case, the corresponding sequence of moves belongs to one of $V^{\\text{int}}_{e}$, $V^{\\text{bot}}_{e}$, or $V^{\\text{rig}}_{e}$, and so $\\phi_{\\mathcal{A}}(m, n)$ is true.\n\nConversely, suppose $\\phi_{\\mathcal{A}}(m, n)$ is true. Then one of $\\phi^{\\text{int}}(m, n)$, $\\phi^{\\text{bot}}(m, n)$, or $\\phi^{\\text{rig}}(m, n)$ is true. If $\\phi^{\\text{int}}(m, n)$ is true, then there exists a sequence of moves $v$ corresponding to an accepting computation of $\\mathcal{A}$, and the inequalities $m \\geq d + 1$ and $n \\geq r + 1$ ensure acceptance occurs before the input head reaches a boundary. The arguments are analogous for the cases where $\\phi^{\\text{bot}}(m, n)$ or $\\phi^{\\text{rig}}(m, n)$ are true. Thus, $(m, n) \\in D(\\mathcal{A})$ and $\\texttt{a}^{m \\times n} \\in L(\\mathcal{A})$.\n\\end{proof}\n\\end{lemma}\n\nIt is well known that Presburger arithmetic is decidable~\\cite{Presburger1930Arithmetik}, and Oppen~\\cite{Oppen1978UpperBoundPresburger} provided a decision procedure for Presburger arithmetic that belongs to the complexity class \\ELEMENTARY. Using Lemma~\\ref{lem:2NFA2Wpresburger} to reframe everything in the system of Presburger arithmetic, we can make use of this existing decision procedure.\n\n\\begin{theorem}\\label{thm:unary2NFA2Wuniversality}\nThe universality, equivalence, inclusion, and disjointness problems for two-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automata over a unary alphabet are in \\ELEMENTARY.\n\n\\begin{proof}\nLet $\\mathcal{A}$ and $\\mathcal{B}$ be unary two-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automata. Use Lemma~\\ref{lem:2NFA2Wpresburger} to obtain Presburger arithmetic formulas $\\phi_{\\mathcal{A}}(m, n)$ and $\\phi_{\\mathcal{B}}(m, n)$ corresponding to the accepted dimension sets $D(\\mathcal{A})$ and $D(\\mathcal{B})$, respectively. Then, we may express each of our decision problems as Presburger arithmetic formulas in the following way:\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item Universality: $\\forall m \\ \\forall n \\ ((m \\geq 1 \\wedge n \\geq 1) \\Rightarrow \\phi_{\\mathcal{A}}(m, n))$.\n\\item Equivalence: $\\forall m \\ \\forall n \\ ((m \\geq 1 \\wedge n \\geq 1) \\Rightarrow (\\phi_{\\mathcal{A}}(m, n) \\Leftrightarrow \\phi_{\\mathcal{B}}(m, n)))$.\n\\item Inclusion: $\\forall m \\ \\forall n \\ ((m \\geq 1 \\wedge n \\geq 1) \\Rightarrow (\\phi_{\\mathcal{A}}(m, n) \\Rightarrow \\phi_{\\mathcal{B}}(m, n)))$.\n\\item Disjointness: $\\forall m \\ \\forall n \\ ((m \\geq 1 \\wedge n \\geq 1) \\Rightarrow \\neg(\\phi_{\\mathcal{A}}(m, n) \\wedge \\phi_{\\mathcal{B}}(m, n)))$. \\qedhere\n\\end{itemize}\n\\end{proof}\n\\end{theorem}\n\nUnfortunately, if we wish to improve this upper bound substantially, we would likely require a novel decision procedure that does not rely on Presburger arithmetic. As Fischer and Rabin~\\cite{FischerRabin1974SuperExponentialPresburger} showed, there exists a constant $c > 0$ such that every decision procedure for Presburger arithmetic has a worst-case time complexity lower bound of $2^{2^{cn}}$, and so any decision procedure using Presburger arithmetic will therefore still have a multiply exponential time complexity.\n\nOn the other hand, we can obtain lower bounds on the complexity of each of these decision problems via straightforward reductions, though the gap between our upper and lower bounds is quite large.\n\n\\begin{theorem}\\label{thm:unary2NFA2WcoNPhard}\nThe universality, equivalence, and inclusion problems for two-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automata over a unary alphabet are \\co\\NP-hard.\n\n\\begin{proof}\nWe prove this theorem via a reduction from the universality problem for unary nondeterministic finite automata. Let $\\mathcal{M}$ be a unary nondeterministic finite automaton. We construct a unary two-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automaton $\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{M}}$ with the property that $L(\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{M}})$ is universal if and only if $L(\\mathcal{M})$ is universal. Given an arbitrary input word $\\texttt{a}^{m \\times n}$, $\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{M}}$ ignores the number of columns and simulates the computation of $\\mathcal{M}$ on the input word $\\texttt{a}^{m}$. Then, $\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{M}}$ accepts $\\texttt{a}^{m \\times n}$ if and only if $\\mathcal{M}$ accepts $\\texttt{a}^{m}$. Since the universality problem for unary nondeterministic finite automata is \\co\\NP-complete and we can reduce from this problem to the universality problem for two-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automata, testing universality is \\co\\NP-hard.\n\nNext, as in the proof of Corollary~\\ref{cor:unary2DFA3Wequivalenceinclusion}, construct a unary two-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automaton $\\mathcal{U}$ recognizing the language $\\Sigma^{++}$. Since deciding whether $L(\\mathcal{A})$ is universal is at least as hard as deciding whether $L(\\mathcal{A}) = L(\\mathcal{U})$ or $L(\\mathcal{U}) \\subseteq L(\\mathcal{A})$, testing equivalence and inclusion is likewise \\co\\NP-hard.\n\\end{proof}\n\\end{theorem}\n\nFor the remaining lower bound, we recall the fact that \\textsc{st-Connectivity}, the problem of determining whether a path exists between two vertices in a directed graph, is \\NL-complete; this result is due to Jones~\\cite{Jones1975SpaceBoundedReducibility}.\n\n\\begin{theorem}\\label{thm:unary2NFA2WNLhard}\nThe disjointness problem for two-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automata over a unary alphabet is \\NL-hard.\n\n\\begin{proof}\nWe prove this theorem via a reduction from \\textsc{st-Nonconnectivity}; this problem is \\co\\NL-complete, and by the Immerman--Szelepcs\\'{e}nyi theorem~\\cite{Immerman1988NLClosedComplementation,Szelepcsenyi1988ForcedEnumeration}, it is also \\NL-complete.\n\nLet $G = (V, E)$ be a directed graph having distinguished vertices $s$ and $t$. We construct a unary two-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automaton $\\mathcal{A}_{G}$ in the following way: each state $q_{v}$ of $\\mathcal{A}_{G}$ corresponds to a vertex $v \\in V$, the initial state corresponds to vertex $s$, the accepting state corresponds to vertex $t$, and for each edge $(u, v) \\in E$, there exists a transition $(q_{v}, D) \\in \\delta(q_{u}, \\texttt{a})$.\n\nIf $t$ is reachable from $s$ via a path having length $\\ell$, then $\\mathcal{A}_{G}$ accepts a unary input word having dimension $(\\ell + 1) \\times 1$. If $t$ is not reachable, however, then $L(\\mathcal{A}_{G}) = \\emptyset$. If we take $\\mathcal{U}$ to be the unary two-way nondeterministic two-dimensional automaton constructed in the proof of Theorem~\\ref{thm:unary2NFA2WcoNPhard}, then $L(\\mathcal{A}_{G}) \\cap L(\\mathcal{U}) = \\emptyset$ if and only if $t$ is not reachable from $s$ in $G$.\n\nSince \\textsc{st-Nonconnectivity} is \\NL-complete and we can construct $\\mathcal{A}_{G}$ in space logarithmic in $|G|$, testing disjointness is \\NL-hard.\n\\end{proof}\n\\end{theorem}\n\n%%%%%%\n\n\\section{Conclusion}\\label{sec:conclusion}\n\nIn this paper, we studied various decision problems for unary two-dimensional automata and established complexity bounds for these problems. We showed that the \\TDFATWOS\\ universality, equivalence, and inclusion problems were \\co\\NP-hard; the \\TDFATWOWOS\\ universality, equivalence, inclusion, and disjointness problems were in \\P; the \\TNFATWOWOS\\ universality, equivalence, and inclusion problems were \\coNP-hard and in \\ELEMENTARY; and the \\TNFATWOWOS\\ disjointness problem was \\NL-hard and in \\ELEMENTARY. We also established that a bounded variant of the \\TNFATWOS\\ universality problem was decidable, and proved that it was \\co\\NP-complete.\n\nThere still remain certain questions that could guide future research in this area and allow us to better understand the capability of the unary two-dimensional automaton model. For instance, what is an upper bound on the complexity of the \\TDFATWOS\\ universality, equivalence, and inclusion problems? In addition, now that the \\TNFATWOWOS\\ universality, equivalence, inclusion, and disjointness problems are known to be decidable, it would be worth studying alternative decision procedures for these problems that do not rely on Presburger arithmetic; for such a conceptually simple model of computation, it would be somewhat surprising if the only known procedure to decide common problems for this model is in \\ELEMENTARY. Lastly, there remain many open questions surrounding \\TNFATWOS\\ decision problems: is the universality problem decidable in the general case, and are each of the equivalence, inclusion, and disjointness problems decidable as well?\n\n%%%%%%\n\n\\section*{Acknowledgements}\\label{sec:acknowledgements}\n\nThis research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant RGPIN-2024-04799.\n\n%%%%%%\n\n\\bibliographystyle{plain}\n\\bibliography{./References}\n%\\nocite{*}\n\n%%%%%%\n\n\\end{document}\n\n%%%%%%\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091175,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31975"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31975"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Sarunas Verner"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Ignatios Antoniadis, John Ellis, Dimitri V. Nanopoulos, Keith A. Olive, Sarunas Verner"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Reheating in No-Scale Models of Inflation"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"34 pages, 1 figure"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"string","value":"UMN-TH-4533/26, FTPI-MINN-26/13, KCL-PH-TH/2026-19, CERN-TH-2026-154"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"hep-ph astro-ph.CO hep-th"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Analogously to the suppression of inflaton decays into conformally-coupled scalar fields in the original Starobinsky $R + R^2$ model of inflation, inflaton decays to Standard Model fields are also suppressed in minimal no-scale models of inflation with field space curvature $\\mathcal{R} = 2/3$. We study how this suppression can be avoided in generalized no-scale inflationary models. These include models in which the field space curvature $\\mathcal{R} = 2/(3\\alpha)$ with $\\alpha \\ne 1$ as exemplified by models derived from string theory, as well as models with non-minimal gauge kinetic terms and anomaly-induced couplings. We analyze direct and anomaly-induced inflaton couplings to gauge bosons and gauginos and demonstrate the K\\\"ahler-frame invariance of the physical gauge coupling. We determine the resulting reheating temperatures and the corresponding predictions in the $(n_s,r)$ plane. Finally, we consider an $R^3$ deformation of Starobinsky supergravity, which modifies the inflaton and stabilizer sectors but does not, by itself, generate new tree-level inflaton couplings to visible matter fields."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:16:41 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:16:41 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Antoniadis","Ignatios",""],["Ellis","John",""],["Nanopoulos","Dimitri V.",""],["Olive","Keith A.",""],["Verner","Sarunas",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Antoniadis\",\n \"Ignatios\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Ellis\",\n \"John\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Nanopoulos\",\n \"Dimitri V.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Olive\",\n \"Keith A.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Verner\",\n \"Sarunas\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: jcappub.sty\n================================================\n%% jcappub.sty\n%% Copyright 2015 SISSA Medialab\n%\n% This work may be distributed and/or modified under the\n% conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3\n% of this license or (at your option) any later version.\n% The latest version of this license is in\n% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt\n% and version 1.3 or later is part of all distributions of LaTeX\n% version 2005/12/01 or later.\n%\n% This work has the LPPL maintenance status `author-maintained'.\n%\n% The Current Maintainer of this work is\n% SISSA Medialab <info@medialab.sissa.it>\n%\n% This work consists of the file jcappub.sty.\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesPackage{jcappub}[2018/12/04 v.1.1227]\n\n\n\\gdef\\@fpheader{Prepared for submission to JCAP}\n\\gdef\\@journal{jcap}\n\n\\ProcessOptions\\relax\n\n\\RequirePackage{amsmath}\n\\RequirePackage{amssymb}\n\\RequirePackage{epsfig}\n\\RequirePackage{graphicx}\n\\RequirePackage[numbers,sort&compress]{natbib}\n\\RequirePackage[colorlinks=true\n ,urlcolor=blue\n ,anchorcolor=blue\n ,citecolor=blue\n ,filecolor=blue\n ,linkcolor=blue\n ,menucolor=blue\n% ,pagecolor=blue\n ,linktocpage=true\n ,pdfproducer=medialab\n ,pdfa=true\n]{hyperref}\n\n\\newif\\ifnotoc\\notocfalse\n\\newif\\ifemailadd\\emailaddfalse\n\\newif\\iftoccontinuous\\toccontinuousfalse\n\n\\def\\@subheader{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@keywords{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@abstract{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@xtum{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@dedicated{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@arxivnumber{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@collaboration{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@collaborationImg{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@proceeding{\\@empty}\n\n\\newcommand{\\subheader}[1]{\\gdef\\@subheader{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\keywords}[1]{\\if!\\@keywords!\\gdef\\@keywords{#1}\\else%\n\\PackageWarningNoLine{\\jname}{Keywords already defined.\\MessageBreak Ignoring last definition.}\\fi}\n\\renewcommand{\\abstract}[1]{\\gdef\\@abstract{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\dedicated}[1]{\\gdef\\@dedicated{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\arxivnumber}[1]{\\gdef\\@arxivnumber{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\proceeding}[1]{\\gdef\\@proceeding{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\xtumfont}[1]{{\\bfseries\\large\\sffamily{#1}}}\n\\newcommand{\\correctionref}[3]{\\gdef\\@xtum{\\xtumfont{#1} \\href{#2}{#3}}}\n\\newcommand\\jname{JCAP}\n\\newcommand\\acknowledgments{\\section*{Acknowledgments}}\n\\newcommand\\notoc{\\notoctrue}\n\n\n\n%Equivalent to ``\\footnote'', but can be used inside the \\author macro\n% because it does not write the footnote mark\n% it has an optional argument that will be used as footnote mark when given\n% WARNING: when the optional argument is used, the footnotecounter is not increased\n% WARNING: the character ``!'' cannot be used.\n% If you really need it use somthing like [\\relax !] as the optional arg.\n\\newcommand\\note[2][]{%\n\\if!#1!%\n\\stepcounter{footnote}\\footnotetext{#2}%\n\\else%\n{\\renewcommand\\thefootnote{#1}%\n\\footnotetext{#2}}%\n\\fi}\n\n\n\n%Use this if you want to try to keep some piece of the abstract on a\n%very long first page\n\\newcommand\\compress{%\n\\renewcommand\\afterProceedingsSpace{\\bigskip}%\n\\renewcommand\\afterTitleSpace{\\bigskip}}\n\n%authors and affiliations\n\\newtoks\\auth@toks\n\\renewcommand{\\author}[2][]{%\n \\if!#1!%\n \\auth@toks=\\expandafter{\\the\\auth@toks#2\\ }%\n \\else\n \\auth@toks=\\expandafter{\\the\\auth@toks#2$^{#1}$\\ }%\n \\fi\n}\n\n\\newtoks\\affil@toks\\newif\\ifaffil\\affilfalse\n\\newcommand{\\affiliation}[2][]{%\n\\affiltrue\n \\if!#1!%\n \\affil@toks=\\expandafter{\\the\\affil@toks{\\item[]#2}}%\n \\else\n \\affil@toks=\\expandafter{\\the\\affil@toks{\\item[$^{#1}$]#2}}%\n \\fi\n}\n\n%emails\n%automatically put a comma between emails\n\\newtoks\\email@toks\\newcounter{email@counter}%\n\\setcounter{email@counter}{0}%\n\\newcommand{\\emailAdd}[1]{%\n\\emailaddtrue%\n\\ifnum\\theemail@counter>0\\email@toks=\\expandafter{\\the\\email@toks, \\@email{#1}}%\n\\else\\email@toks=\\expandafter{\\the\\email@toks\\@email{#1}}%\n\\fi\\stepcounter{email@counter}}\n\\newcommand{\\@email}[1]{\\href{mailto:#1}{\\rm #1}}\n\n\n% Collaboration macros\n\\newcommand*\\collaboration[1]{\\gdef\\@collaboration{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\collaborationImg[2][]{\\gdef\\@collaborationImg{#2}}\n\n%all pieces get a ``after'' spacing\n\\newcommand\\afterLogoSpace{\\vskip3pt plus3pt minus1pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterSubheaderSpace{\\vskip3pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterProceedingsSpace{\\vskip30pt plus0.4fil minus20pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterTitleSpace{\\vskip25pt plus0.3fil minus12pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterCollaborationSpace{\\vskip3pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterCollaborationImgSpace{\\vskip3pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterAuthorSpace{\\vskip-13pt plus1pt minus4pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterAffiliationSpace{\\vskip-2pt plus3pt minus0.5pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterEmailSpace{\\vskip13pt plus8pt minus8pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterXtumSpace{\\par\\bigskip}\n\\newcommand\\afterAbstractSpace{\\vskip13pt plus8pt minus11pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterKeywordsSpace{\\vskip13pt plus8pt minus11pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterArxivSpace{\\vskip3pt plus0.01fil minus10pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterDedicatedSpace{\\vskip0pt plus0.01fil}\n\\newcommand\\afterTocSpace{\\medskip}\n%this is the ``itemsep'' of the affiliations list\n\\newlength{\\affiliationsSep}\\setlength{\\affiliationsSep}{-3pt}\n%this hook is needed if the toc starts on the first page\n\\newcommand\\beforetochook{\\pagestyle{myplain}\\pagenumbering{roman}}\n\n\\DeclareFixedFont\\trfont{OT1}{phv}{b}{sc}{11}\n\n% First page\n\\renewcommand\\maketitle{\n\\pagestyle{empty}\n\\thispagestyle{titlepage}\n\\setcounter{page}{0}\n\\noindent{\\small\\sc\\@fpheader}\n\\afterLogoSpace\n% Sub-header\n\\if!\\@subheader!\\else\\noindent{\\trfont{\\@subheader}}\\fi\n\\afterSubheaderSpace\n% Proceedings\n\\if!\\@proceeding!\\else\\noindent{\\sc\\@proceeding}\\fi\n\\afterProceedingsSpace\n% Title\n{{\\Huge \\flushleft\\sffamily\\bfseries\\@title\\par} }\n\\afterTitleSpace\n% Collaboration\n\\if!\\@collaboration!\\else\n{\\Large\\bfseries\\sffamily\\raggedright\\@collaboration}\\par\n\\afterCollaborationSpace\n\\fi\n\\if!\\@collaborationImg!\\else\n{\\normalsize\\bfseries\\sffamily\\raggedright\\@collaborationImg}\\par\n\\afterCollaborationImgSpace\n%% I leave the size and font so that if there are two collaboration\n%% they can be linked with an 'and'\n\\fi\n% Author\n{\\renewcommand{\\baselinestretch}{.9}\n{\\Large \\bfseries\\raggedright\\sffamily\\the\\auth@toks\\par}}\n\\afterAuthorSpace\\\n% Affiliation\n\\ifaffil\\begin{list}{}{%\n\\setlength{\\leftmargin}{0.28cm}%\n\\setlength{\\labelsep}{0pt}%\n\\setlength{\\itemsep}{\\affiliationsSep}}\n\\the\\affil@toks\n\\end{list}\\fi\n\\afterAffiliationSpace\n% E-mail\n\\ifemailadd %% if emailadd is true\n\\noindent\\hspace{0.28cm}\\begin{minipage}[l]{.9\\textwidth}\n\\begin{flushleft}\nE-mail: \\the\\email@toks\n\\end{flushleft}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\else %% if emailaddfalse do nothing\n\\PackageWarningNoLine{\\jname}{E-mails are missing.\\MessageBreak Plese use \\protect\\emailAdd\\space macro to provide e-mails.}\n\\fi\n\\afterEmailSpace\n% Erratum or addendum\n\\if!\\@xtum!\\else\\noindent{\\@xtum}\\afterXtumSpace\\fi\n% Abstract\n\\if!\\@abstract!\\else\\noindent{\\bfseries\\large\\sffamily{Abstract.}}\\ \\@abstract\\smallbreak\\afterAbstractSpace\\fi\n% Keywords\n\\if!\\@keywords!\\else\\noindent{\\bfseries\\large\\sffamily{Keywords:}} {\\@keywords}\\afterKeywordsSpace\\fi\n% Arxivnumber\n\\if!\\@arxivnumber!\\else\\noindent{\\bfseries\\large\\sffamily{ArXiv ePrint:}} \\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/\\@arxivnumber}{\\@arxivnumber}\\afterArxivSpace\\fi\n% Dedication\n\\if!\\@dedicated!\\else\\vbox{\\small\\it\\raggedleft\\@dedicated}\\goodbreak\\afterDedicatedSpace\\fi\n%\n\\ifnotoc\\else\n\\iftoccontinuous\\else\\newpage\\fi\n\\beforetochook\\hrule\n\\tableofcontents\n\\afterTocSpace\n\\hrule\n\\fi\n\\setcounter{footnote}{0}\n\\pagestyle{myplain}\\pagenumbering{arabic}\n} % close the \\renewcommand\\maketitle{\n\n\n\n\\setlength{\\topmargin}{\\z@}\n\\setlength{\\headheight}{13pt}\n\\setlength{\\headsep}{\\z@}\n\\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{13pt}\n\\setlength{\\textwidth}{440pt}\n\\setlength{\\marginparwidth}{71pt}\n\\setlength{\\textheight}{642pt}\n\\setlength{\\footskip}{55pt}\n\\setlength\\parindent{1.2\\parindent}\n\n\n\n\\renewcommand{\\baselinestretch}{}\n\n\\setlength\\lineskip{1\\p@}\n\\setlength\\parindent{1.2\\parindent}\n\\setlength\\normallineskip{1\\p@}\n\\setlength\\parskip{0\\p@ \\@plus \\p@}\n\\@lowpenalty 51\n\\@medpenalty 151\n\\@highpenalty 301\n\\widowpenalty 1000\n\\clubpenalty 1000\n\n\\setcounter{topnumber}{4}\n\\renewcommand\\topfraction{1}\n\\setcounter{bottomnumber}{1}\n\\renewcommand\\bottomfraction{.6}\n\\setcounter{totalnumber}{5}\n\\renewcommand\\textfraction{0}\n\\renewcommand\\floatpagefraction{0.8}\n\\setlength{\\floatsep}{14pt plus 8pt minus 6pt}\n\n\\setlength\\arraycolsep{2\\p@} % TO MATCH eqnarrays<->equations\n\\setlength\\tabcolsep{6\\p@}\n\\setlength\\arrayrulewidth{.4\\p@}\n\\setlength\\doublerulesep{2\\p@}\n\\setlength\\tabbingsep{\\labelsep}\n\\skip\\@mpfootins = \\skip\\footins\n\\setlength\\fboxsep{3\\p@}\n\\setlength\\fboxrule{.4\\p@}\n\n% No dots in the table of contents\n\\renewcommand{\\@dotsep}{10000}\n\n% Footer and header of the body\n% the command ``\\pagestyle{myplain}'' must be inserted\n% just after ``\\begin{document}''\n\\newcommand\\ps@myplain{\n\\pagenumbering{arabic}\n\\renewcommand\\@oddfoot{\\hfill-- \\thepage\\ --\\hfill}\n\\renewcommand\\@oddhead{}}\n\\let\\ps@plain=\\ps@myplain\n\n\n\n% no header or footer in the title page\n\\newcommand\\ps@titlepage{\\renewcommand\\@oddfoot{}\\renewcommand\\@oddhead{}}\n\n\n\n%number equations after the sections\n\\renewcommand{\\theequation}{\\thesection.\\arabic{equation}}\n\\numberwithin{equation}{section}\n\n\n%headings style\n\\renewcommand\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}%\n {-3.5ex \\@plus -1.3ex \\@minus -.7ex}%\n {2.3ex \\@plus.4ex \\@minus .4ex}%\n {\\normalfont\\large\\bfseries}}\n\\renewcommand\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}%\n {-2.3ex\\@plus -1ex \\@minus -.5ex}%\n {1.2ex \\@plus .3ex \\@minus .3ex}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries}}\n\\renewcommand\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}%\n {-2.3ex\\@plus -1ex \\@minus -.5ex}%\n {1ex \\@plus .2ex \\@minus .2ex}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries}}\n\\renewcommand\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}%\n {1.75ex \\@plus1ex \\@minus.2ex}%\n {-1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries}}\n\\renewcommand\\subparagraph{\\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\\z@}%\n {1.75ex \\@plus1ex \\@minus .2ex}%\n {-1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}\n\n\n%Caption of figure and table\n\\def\\fnum@figure{\\textbf{\\figurename\\nobreakspace\\thefigure}}\n\\def\\fnum@table{\\textbf{\\tablename\\nobreakspace\\thetable}}\n\n%redefining \\@makecaption, to have captions with \\small font size\n%taken from article.cls l.489--498\n%the only differences are the ``\\small '' commands added on two lines\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{%\n \\vskip\\abovecaptionskip\n \\sbox\\@tempboxa{\\small #1. #2}%\n \\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize\n \\small #1. #2\\par\n \\else\n \\global \\@minipagefalse\n \\hb@xt@\\hsize{\\hfil\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n \\fi\n \\vskip\\belowcaptionskip}\n\n\n\n\n\n%apply some formatting on the biblio\n%without redefining the whole env\n\\let\\oldthebibliography=\\thebibliography\n\\let\\endoldthebibliography=\\endthebibliography\n\\renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]{%\n\\begin{oldthebibliography}{#1}%\n\\small%\n\\raggedright%\n\\setlength{\\itemsep}{5pt plus 0.2ex minus 0.05ex}%\n}%\n{%\n\\end{oldthebibliography}%\n}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n\\newcommand{\\gev}{\\, {\\rm GeV}}\n\\newcommand{\\tev}{\\, {\\rm TeV}}\n\\newcommand{\\mev}{\\, {\\rm MeV}}\n\\newcommand{\\pev}{\\, {\\rm PeV}}\n\\newcommand{\\kev}{\\, {\\rm keV}}\n\\newcommand{\\beq}{\\begin{equation}}\n\\newcommand{\\eeq}{\\end{equation}}\n\\newcommand{\\bea}{\\begin{eqnarray}}\n\\newcommand{\\eea}{\\end{eqnarray}}\n\\newcommand{\\seff}{\\sin^2\\theta_W^{\\rm eff}}\n\\newcommand{\\gsim}{\\lower.7ex\\hbox{$\\;\\stackrel{\\textstyle>}{\\sim}\\;$}}\n\\newcommand{\\lsim}{\\lower.7ex\\hbox{$\\;\\stackrel{\\textstyle<}{\\sim}\\;$}}\n\\newcommand{\\nnmb}{\\nonumber}\n\\newcommand{\\xpb}{\\,{\\rm pb}}\n\\newcommand{\\mrm}{\\mathrm}\n\\newcommand{\\trh}{T_{\\rm RH}}\n\\newcommand{\\arh}{a_{\\rm RH}}\n\\newcommand{\\aend}{a_{\\rm end}}\n\\newcommand{\\rhoend}{\\rho_{\\rm end}}\n\\newcommand{\\rhorh}{\\rho_{\\rm RH}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\drawsquare}[2]{\\hbox{%\n\\rule{#2pt}{#1pt}\\hskip-#2pt% left vertical\n\\rule{#1pt}{#2pt}\\hskip-#1pt% lower horizontal\n\\rule[#1pt]{#1pt}{#2pt}}\\rule[#1pt]{#2pt}{#2pt}\\hskip-#2pt% upper horizontal\n\\rule{#2pt}{#1pt}}% right vertical\n\n% Young tableaux\n\\newcommand{\\fund}{\\raisebox{-.5pt}{\\drawsquare{6.5}{0.4}}}% fund\n\\newcommand{\\Ysymm}{\\raisebox{-.5pt}{\\drawsquare{6.5}{0.4}}\\hskip-0.4pt%\n \\raisebox{-.5pt}{\\drawsquare{6.5}{0.4}}}% symmetric second rank\n\\newcommand{\\Yasymm}{\\raisebox{-3.5pt}{\\drawsquare{6.5}{0.4}}\\hskip-6.9pt%\n \\raisebox{3pt}{\\drawsquare{6.5}{0.4}}}% antisymmetric second rank\n\\newcommand{\\antifund}{\\overline{\\fund}}\n\\newcommand{\\bYasymm}{\\overline{\\Yasymm}}\n\\newcommand{\\bYsymm}{\\overline{\\Ysymm}}\n\n\\documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{article}\n\\pdfoutput=1\n\n\\usepackage{jcappub}\n% \\usepackage{jheppub}\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \n\\usepackage{amsfonts,amssymb,mathrsfs,amsmath,esint,bm}\n\\usepackage{pdflscape} \n\\usepackage[capitalise]{cleveref}\n%\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\allowdisplaybreaks\n\n\\graphicspath{{./Figures/}}\n\\usepackage{latexsym}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{subfigure}\n\\usepackage[dvipsnames]{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{physics}\n\\usepackage{tikz}\n\\usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathmorphing}\\usetikzlibrary{positioning,calc}\n\\usetikzlibrary{math}\n\\usepackage{cleveref}\n\\usepackage{comment}\n\\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}\n\n% Constructing composite symbols -------------------------------------\n\n\\hypersetup{pdfstartview=FitV,colorlinks=true,linkcolor=blue,citecolor=red,filecolor=black,urlcolor=blue}\n\n\\def\\stacksymbols #1#2#3#4{\\def\\theguybelow{#2}\n \\def\\vp{\\lower#3pt}\n \\def\\sp{\\baselineskip0pt\\lineskip#4pt}\n \\mathrel{\\mathpalette\\intermediary#1}}\n\n\\def\\intermediary#1#2{\\vp\\vbox{\\sp\n \\everycr={}\\tabskip0pt\n \\halign{$\\mathsurround0pt#1\\hfil##\\hfil$\\crcr#2\\crcr\n \\theguybelow\\crcr}}}\n\n\\def\\gapproxeq{\\stacksymbols{>}{\\sim}{2.5}{.2}}\n\\def\\lapproxeq{\\stacksymbols{<}{\\sim}{2.5}{.2}}\n\n\n\n\\title{Reheating in No-Scale Models of Inflation}\n\n\\author[a,b]{\\bf Ignatios Antoniadis,}\n\\affiliation[a]{School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA}\n\\affiliation[b]{Laboratoire de Physique Th\\'eorique et Hautes \\'Energies\n - LPTHE,\nSorbonne Universit\\'e, CNRS, 4 Place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France\n}\n\\emailAdd{antoniad@lpthe.jussieu.fr}\n\n\\author[c,d]{John Ellis,}\n\\affiliation[c]{Theoretical Particle Physics and Cosmology Group, Department of\n Physics, \\\\ King's~College~London, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom}\n\\affiliation[d]{Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23,\n Switzerland}\n\\emailAdd{john.ellis@cern.ch}\n\n\n\n\\author[e,f]{\\bf \\\\ Dimitri V. Nanopoulos}\n\\affiliation[e]{Academy of Athens, Division of Natural Sciences, Athens 10679, Greece\n}\n\\affiliation[f]{George P. and Cynthia W. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy, Texas A\\&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA\n}\n\\emailAdd{dimitri@physics.tamu.edu}\n\n\\author[g]{Keith A. Olive,}\n\\affiliation[g]{William I.~Fine Theoretical Physics Institute, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA}\n\\emailAdd{olive@umn.edu}\n\n\\author[h]{and Sarunas~Verner,}\n\\affiliation[h]{Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics,\nUniversity of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Ave., Chicago, IL 60637, USA}\n\\emailAdd{verner@uchicago.edu}\n\n\\abstract{Analogously to the suppression of inflaton decays into conformally-coupled scalar fields in the original Starobinsky $R + R^2$ model of inflation, inflaton decays to Standard Model fields are also suppressed in minimal no-scale models of inflation with field space curvature $\\mathcal{R} = 2/3$. We study how this suppression can be avoided in generalized no-scale inflationary models. These include models in which the field space curvature $\\mathcal{R} = 2/(3\\alpha)$ with $\\alpha \\ne 1$ as exemplified by models derived from string theory, as well as models with non-minimal gauge kinetic terms and anomaly-induced couplings. We analyze direct and anomaly-induced inflaton couplings to gauge bosons and gauginos and demonstrate the K\\\"ahler-frame invariance of the physical gauge coupling. We determine the resulting reheating temperatures and the corresponding predictions in the $(n_s,r)$ plane. Finally, we consider an $R^3$ deformation of Starobinsky supergravity, which modifies the inflaton and stabilizer sectors but does not, by itself, generate new tree-level inflaton couplings to visible matter fields.}\n\n\n\n\n\n\\begin{document}\n\\begin{flushright}\nUMN--TH--4533/26, FTPI--MINN-26/13, \\\\\nKCL--PH--TH/2026-19, CERN--TH--2026-154 \\\\\nJune 2026\n\\end{flushright}\n\\maketitle\n\n\n\\section{Introduction}\n\nOne of the most promising models of inflation is that proposed originally by Starobinsky, which was derived from an $R+R^2$ theory of gravity~\\cite{Staro}. When transformed to the Einstein frame, the theory is described by Einstein gravity with a single real scalar field, $\\phi$, with potential \\cite{WhittStelle,Kalara:1990ar}\n\\beq\nV(\\phi) = \\frac{3}{4} m^2 M_{P}^{2}\\left(1-e^{-\\sqrt{\\frac{2}{3}} \\frac{\\phi}{M_{P}}}\\right)^{2} \\, ,\n\\label{Staro}\n\\eeq\nwhere $M_P \\simeq 2.4 \\times 10^{18}$~GeV is the reduced Planck mass. Inflation (near-exponential expansion) occurs at large values of $\\phi$, where the potential is almost flat. This expansion \nceases at $\\phi_{\\rm end}\\simeq 0.63 M_P$ when the field enters into harmonic oscillations about its minimum at $\\phi = 0$. The inflaton mass for this model is simply $m$. \n\nWhile an extended period of exponential expansion solves a host of cosmological problems \\cite{Guth:1980zm} and provides a source for cosmological perturbations \\cite{MC,pert}, the return to a standard radiation-dominated phase in the early universe is an essential feature of any inflation model \\cite{reviews}. So long as the inflaton is coupled (in some way) to Standard Model (SM) fields, reheating is possible\nduring the oscillatory phase after inflation. How this coupling arises in models of inflation based on no-scale supergravity \\cite{no-scale} is the focus of this paper. In particular, we are interested in no-scale models which are capable of reproducing Starobinsky(-like) models of inflation \\cite{eno6,building}. \n\nIn the Starobinsky model \\cite{Staro}, originally formulated as an $R+R^2$ theory of gravity, one may introduce\nthe SM action in the Jordan frame with a minimal coupling to curvature. In this case, \none naturally finds a coupling of the inflaton to the Higgs boson in the Einstein frame \\cite{Ema:2024sit}, leading to the possibility of inflaton decay with a rate \n\\begin{align}\n\t\\Gamma(\\phi \\to HH) = \\frac{N_H}{192\\pi}\\frac{m^3}{M_P^2}\\,,\n\t\\label{eq:decay_R2_A1}\n\\end{align}\n%%\nwhere $N_H = 4$ is\nthe number of the real scalar degrees of freedom of the SM Higgs doublet. \nInflaton decays quickly lead to a thermal bath that redshifts as $\\rho_{\\rm R} \\propto a^{-3/2}$ \\cite{Scherrer:1984fd,Giudice:2000ex,GKMO1,GKMO2} where $a$ is the cosmological scale factor. This can be compared to the (initially dominant) inflaton energy density $\\rho_\\phi$ that redshifts as $a^{-3}$. The reheating temperature is defined by equality between the inflaton and thermal energy densities: $\\rho_\\phi (\\arh) = \\rho_{\\rm R}(\\arh)$, i.e.,\n\\beq\n\\frac{g_*(\\trh) \\pi^2}{30} \\trh^4 = \\frac{12}{25} \\Gamma_\\phi^2 M_P^2 \\, ,\n\\label{TRH}\n\\eeq\nwhere $g_*(\\trh)$ is the number of relativistic degrees of freedom at $\\trh$.\nThe di-Higgs decay rate Eq.~(\\ref{eq:decay_R2_A1}) is important, as it leads to natural reheating with a reheating temperature \n\\beq\n\\trh = 2.9 \\times 10^9~{\\rm GeV} \\left(\\frac{m}{3 \\times 10^{13}~{\\rm GeV}} \\right)^\\frac32 \\, ,\n\\eeq\nwhere the inflaton mass $m= 3\\times 10^{13}$~GeV is fixed by the amplitude of the scalar perturbation spectrum \\cite{Planck} and we have taken $g_*(\\trh) = 427/4$.~\\footnote{We note that later, when we consider a supersymmetric framework, we use the minimal supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) value of $g_*(\\trh) = 915/4$.}\n\nHowever, if the Higgs boson has a coupling $\\xi$ to curvature in the Jordan frame, the rate is modified so that \\cite{Watanabe:2006ku,Ema:2024sit}\n\\begin{align}\n\t\\Gamma(\\phi \\to HH) = \\frac{N_H(1-6\\xi)^2}{192\\pi}\\frac{m^3}{M_P^2}\\,,\\label{ratea2ein}\n\\end{align}\nand the rate vanishes for the conformal coupling $\\xi = 1/6$. \n\nHowever, even if SM fields are conformally coupled to curvature, the possibility of inflaton decay persists in the Starobinsky model through the coupling to the trace anomaly \\cite{Gorbunov:2012ns}:\n\\beq\n\\Omega \\left< T^\\mu_\\mu \\right> \\; = \\;\\frac{\\phi}{\\sqrt{6}\\,M_P}\n\\left< T^\\mu_\\mu \\right>.\\eeq\nwhere $e^{2\\Omega}$ is the conformal factor that transforms the theory from the Jordan to the Einstein frame, $\\phi$ is the canonical inflaton and $T^\\mu_\\mu$ is the trace of the energy momentum tensor. This leads to a decay of the inflaton to gauge bosons \\cite{Kamada:2019pmx}\n\\begin{align}\n\t\\left.{T^\\mu}_\\mu\\right\\vert_\\mathrm{anom} = \\sum_{i,a} \\frac{\\beta_a}{4\\alpha_a} F^{a}_{i\\mu\\nu} F_i^{a \\mu\\nu}\\,,\n \\label{anomT}\n\\end{align}\nwhere $\\beta_a$ is the beta function for the gauge group with generalized fine structure constant, $\\alpha_a$ and field strength $F^a_{i\\mu\\nu}$ for $i=1-(N^2-1)$ for an SU(N) gauge group. This leads to a decay rate\n\\begin{align}\n\t\\Gamma(\\phi \\to AA) = \\sum_a \\frac{N_{a} b_a^2 \\alpha_a^2}{1536\\pi^3}\\frac{m^3}{M_P^2}\\,,\n \\label{anomD}\n\\end{align}\nsummed over groups with $N_a$ gauge bosons and leads to a reheating temperature of order $10^{8}$~GeV \\cite{Ema:2024sit}. \n\nThe connection between the $R+R^2$ theory of gravity and no-scale supergravity has been explored in some detail \\cite{eno9,DLT, building,Antoniadis:2026uzn}, and supersymmetrization of the Starobinsky model\nfinds a natural formulation in the context of no-scale supergravity \\cite{Cecotti}. As we discuss in more detail below, the no-scale K\\\"ahler potential with field space curvature $\\mathcal{R} = 2/3$ and minimal kinetic terms for SM fields can be matched (in the Jordan frame) to fields conformally coupled to curvature. In this case, we expect, by analogy with the Starobinsky model, vanishing couplings of the inflaton to SM fields (up to terms such as the Higgs mass, which breaks the conformal invariance) leading to a very small decay rate for the inflaton and hence a very low reheating temperature \\cite{Endo:2006xg,egno4}.\n\nWe discuss in this paper how this conclusion is avoided within well-motivated generalizations of the minimal no-scale realization of Starobinsky-like inflation. These include models in which the field space curvature $\\mathcal{R}$ is modified via a change in the coefficient of the logarithm in the no-scale K{\\\"a}hler potential, as well as in models with non-minimal gauge kinetic terms and in the presence of anomaly-induced couplings. \n\nIn what follows, we first review in Section~\\ref{sec:no-scale} the construction of no-scale inflation models and their connections to $R+R^2$ gravity. Then, in Section~\\ref{sec:infldecay} we derive the generalized couplings and decays of the inflaton to matter fields when the field space curvature is $\\mathcal{R} = 2/3\\alpha$, showing that only for the special case of $\\alpha = 1$ do the tree-level couplings vanish. We then compute the reheating temperature as a function of $\\alpha$ and explore the phenomenological consequences of this generalization, showing that the reheating temperature is greatly increased for generic values of $\\alpha \\ne 1$. We discuss in particular an explicit and motivated example, namely the string-derived model discussed in \\cite{ANR1,ANR2,ANO}, showing that\nit is indeed of the generalized form with $\\alpha = 2/3$, and discuss the consequences for reheating in this model. In Section \\ref{sec:T-gauge} we consider the couplings of the inflaton to gauge bosons (and gauginos) at the tree-level through a non-minimal gauge kinetic function and at one-loop order through the trace anomaly. We discuss the K{\\\"a}hler invariance of these couplings and the importance of this invariance in the context of inflationary avatars. We also present the predictions of the above scenarios in the $(n_s, r)$ plane.\nFor completeness, in Section \\ref{sec:R3}, we also explore the role of a possible $R^3$ correction to the Einstein action and the impact it may have on reheating, which were recently considered in \\cite{Antoniadis:2026uzn,Gialamas:2025ofz}.\nOur conclusions are given in Section \\ref{sec:summ}. \n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\section{No-scale supergravity models of inflation}\n\\label{sec:no-scale}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\nMinimal no-scale supergravity models of inflation are described by two complex scalar fields $(T, C)$ in addition to gravity.\nThe corresponding no-scale supergravity theory is specified by the K\\\"ahler potential\n\\beq\nK \\; = \\; - 3 \\ln \\left(T + {\\bar T} - \\frac{1}{3} C {\\bar C} - \\frac{1}{3} \\sum_i |\\phi_i|^2\\right) \\, ,\n\\label{nsK}\n\\eeq\nwhere SM particles are incorporated as untwisted fields $\\phi_\\alpha$. The\nsuperpotential is given by\n\\beq\nW = \\sqrt{3} m C \\left(T-\\frac12 \\right) + W_{\\rm SM} (\\phi_i) \\, ,\n\\label{CSM}\n\\eeq\nwhere $W_{\\rm SM}(\\phi_\\alpha)$ is the SM superpotential. \nWhen the stabilizer field $C = 0$, the Lagrangian can be written as\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n{\\mathcal L} & = & \\frac{1}{12} (\\partial_\\mu K)^2 + e^{K/3} \\left(|\\partial_\\mu C|^2 +|\\partial_\\mu \\phi^i|^2\\right) \\nonumber \\\\\n&& +\\frac34 e^{2K/3} |\\partial_\\mu (T- T^*) + \\frac13 (\\phi_i^{*}\\partial_{\\mu}\\phi^i-\\phi^i\\partial_{\\mu}\\phi^{*}_i)|^2 - e^{\\frac23 K} {\\hat V} \\, ,\n\\label{LmanyJ}\n\\end{eqnarray}\nand the scalar potential is given by \n\\beq\nV = e^{\\frac23 K} {\\hat V} = e^{\\frac23 K} \\left(\\left| W_{C} \\right|^2 + \\left| W_{i} \\right|^2 +\\frac{1}{3} (T+T^*) |W_T|^2 +\n\\frac{1}{3} \\left(W_T (\\phi_i^* W^{*i} - 3 W^*) + {\\rm h.c.} \\right) \\right) \\, .\n\\eeq\nWith $W_T = 0$,\nthe inflationary potential becomes\n\\beq\nV = \\frac{3 m^2 \\left|(T-\\frac12)\\right|^2}{(T+{\\bar T})^2} \\, .\n\\eeq\nThen, restricting to ${\\rm Im}~T = 0$ and defining the canonical field $T \\equiv \\frac12 e^{\\sqrt{\\frac23} \\frac{\\phi}{M_P}}$, we obtain the Starobinsky potential in Eq.~(\\ref{Staro}). \n\nIt is sometimes convenient to represent the theory in a more symmetric basis.\nIntroducing the coordinates $y_0$ and $y$ given by\n\\begin{equation}\ny_0\n=\n\\frac{2C}{1+2T} \\, ,\n\\qquad\ny_i\n=\n\\frac{2\\phi_i}{1+2T} \\, ,\n\\qquad\ny\n=\n\\sqrt{3}\\,\n\\left( \\frac{1-2T}{1+2T} \\right) \\, ,\n\\label{eq:Tphi-to-y}\n\\end{equation}\nwith the inverse relations\n\\begin{equation}\nC\n=\n\\frac{y_0}{1+y/\\sqrt{3}}\\, , \\qquad\n\\phi_i\n=\n\\frac{y_i}{1+y/\\sqrt{3}}\\, , \\qquad\nT\n=\n\\frac12\n\\left( \\frac{1-y/\\sqrt{3}}{1+y/\\sqrt{3}} \\right) \\, ,\n\\label{eq:y-to-Tphi}\n\\end{equation}\nwe can then rewrite the K\\\"ahler potential as \n\\beq\nK \\; = \\; - 3 \\ln \\left(1 - \\frac13 |y|^2 - \\frac13 |y_0|^2 - \\frac13 \\sum_i |y_i|^2 \\right) \\, .\n\\eeq\nAfter the K\\\"ahler transformation that takes \n\\beq\nW(T, C, \\phi_i) \\; \\to \\; {\\widetilde W}(y, y_0, y_i) \\; = \\; \\left( 1 + {y}/{\\sqrt{3}} \\right)^3 W \\, ,\n\\label{Wtilde}\n\\eeq\nthe superpotential (\\ref{CSM}) becomes\n\\beq\nW = m y y_0 (1+y/\\sqrt{3}) + W_{\\rm SM}(y_i) \\, .\n\\label{CSMs}\n\\eeq\n\nThe choice of the superpotential in Eq.~(\\ref{CSM}) is not unique \\cite{avatars}. Indeed, the first formulation of the Starobinsky model in the framework of no-scale supergravity~\\cite{eno6} related the inflaton to $C$ rather than $T$, and postulated the Wess-Zumino superpotential \n\\beq\nW = m \\left( \\frac12 C^2 - \\frac{1}{3\\sqrt{3}} C^3 \\right) \\, .\n\\label{WWZ}\n\\eeq\nThis yields the Starobinsky potential when ${\\rm{Im}}~C = 0$, $T = \\frac12$, with the canonical inflaton field $\\phi$ being defined by $C \\equiv \\sqrt{6} \\tanh(\\phi/\\sqrt{6} M_P)$ \\cite{eno6}. \n\nThese models are part of a continuous set of possible models that all yield the Starobinsky potential and are related by the underlying SU(2,1)/SU(2)$\\times$U(1) no-scale symmetry \\cite{enov1,building}. \nAt the quantum level, however, these models are not equivalent, as radiative corrections distinguish between them. \nFor example, in the model described by\n(\\ref{WWZ}), supersymmetry is broken during inflation (at large $\\phi$), and 1-loop corrections are significant \\cite{egkko2}. For this reason, we focus hereafter on models more closely related to that defined by (\\ref{CSM}), in which the inflationary potential does not induce large supersymmetry breaking and the 1-loop corrections are negligible.\n\nThe Lagrangian (\\ref{LmanyJ}) derived from Eqs.~(\\ref{nsK}) and (\\ref{CSM}) can also be be derived from the $R+R^2$ model in the Jordan frame. \nIncluding a conformal coupling of the matter fields $\\phi_i$ to curvature, we can start with the action\n\\begin{equation}\n{\\cal A} \\; = \\; - \\frac{1}{2} \\int d^4x \\sqrt{-g} \\left[ R - \\frac{1}{6 m^2} R^2 - 2 \\left(\\partial^\\mu \\phi^i \\partial_\\mu \\phi^*_i + \\xi |\\phi^i|^2 R - {\\hat V} \\right) \\right] \\, ,\n\\label{manyphi}\n\\end{equation}\nwe can introduce the Lagrange multiplier \n$ - R^2 \\to 2 \\Phi R + \\Phi^2$ and perform a conformal transformation~\\cite{WhittStelle,Kalara:1990ar}:\n\\begin{equation}\n{\\tilde g}_{\\mu \\nu} \\; = \\; e^{2\\Omega} g_{\\mu \\nu} \\; = \\; \\left(1 + \\frac{1}{3 m^2} \\Phi - 2 \\xi |\\phi^i |^2\\right) g_{\\mu \\nu} \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nwhich leads to \n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\label{R2Einstein3}\n{\\cal A} \\; & = & \\; - \\frac{1}{2} \\int d^4x \\sqrt{-{\\tilde g}} \\left[ {\\tilde R} - 6 \\partial^\\mu \\Omega \\partial_\\mu \\Omega \\right. \\nonumber \\\\ \n&&\n\\left. \\; - \\; 2 e^{-2\\Omega} \\partial^\\mu \\phi^i \\partial_\\mu \\phi^*_i + e^{-4\\Omega} \\left( \\frac{1}{6 m^2} \\Phi^2 + 2 {\\hat V} \\right) \\right] \\, ,\n\\end{eqnarray}\nwhere ${\\tilde R}$ is the curvature scalar in the Einstein frame. With the identification \n\\beq\n\\Omega = -K/6 \\, ,\n\\eeq we recover the form of the Lagrangian in Eq.~(\\ref{LmanyJ}) for $(1 + \\frac{1}{3 m^2} \\Phi) = T + {\\bar T} $ and $\\xi = 1/6$.~\\footnote{Note that the additional terms in Eq.~(\\ref{LmanyJ}) involving the imaginary parts of the scalar fields can be accounted for by including an auxiliary field, $b_\\mu$ coupled to a current such that the Lagrangian includes $\\frac13 b_\\mu b^\\mu -b_\\mu J^\\mu$ with $J^\\mu = \\frac13 (K_T \\partial^\\mu T + K_i \\partial \\phi^i - K^T \\partial^\\mu {\\bar T} - K^i \\partial^\\mu \\phi^*_i$) \\cite{eno9}. } For further details of this correspondence, see \\cite{DLT,eno9,building}.\n\n\n\nOne of the great successes of the inflation paradigm is the possibility of generating nearly scale-independent density fluctuations. One can compare the theoretical predictions of the anisotropy spectrum with experiment by computing, for example, the tilt of the scalar power spectrum, $n_s$, its amplitude, $A_s$, and the ratio of the tensor-to-scalar amplitudes, $r$. These are conveniently calculated using the slow-roll parameters, $\\epsilon$ and $\\eta$.\nFor a given single-field scalar potential, these are given by\n\\begin{equation} \n\\epsilon \\; \\equiv \\; \\frac{1}{2} M_{P}^2 \\left( \\frac{V'}{V} \\right)^2 ; \\; \\; \\eta \\; \\equiv \\; M_{P}^2 \\left( \\frac{V''}{V} \\right) \\, ,\n\\label{epsilon}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere, here and subsequently, the prime denotes a derivative with respect to the inflaton field $\\phi$. The inflationary observables are then easily computed in terms of $\\epsilon$ and $\\eta$:\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n%\\hspace{-5mm} \nA_s \\;& = &\\; \\frac{V_*}{24 \\pi^2 \\epsilon_* M_{P}^4 } \\simeq 2.1 \\times 10^{-9} \\, , \\label{As} \\\\ \\notag\n n_s \\; & \\simeq &\\; 1 - 6 \\epsilon_* + 2 \\eta_* = 0.965 \\pm 0.004 \\; (68\\%~{\\rm CL}) \\, ,\n\\label{ns} \\\\\n r \\; &\n\\simeq & \\; 16 \\epsilon_* < 0.036 \\; (95\\%~{\\rm CL}) \\, . \\label{r}\n\\label{observables}\n\\end{eqnarray}\nIn these expressions, the potential and slow-roll parameters are to be evaluated at the CMB pivot scale, $k_* = 0.05$~Mpc$^{-1}$. The experimental values for $A_s$ and $n_s$ are taken from {\\it Planck} measurements~\\cite{Planck} and the upper limit on $r$ from a combination of {\\it Planck} and BICEP/Keck results~\\cite{BICEP2021,Tristram:2021tvh}. We note that more recent results from the ACT collaboration~\\cite{AtacamaCosmologyTelescope:2025blo} may indicate a higher value of $n_s$, which may call for deformations of the Starobinsky potential \\cite{Antoniadis:2025pfa,Ellis:2025ieh,EGOV}, but that is not our focus here.~\\footnote{Recent results from the SPT collaboration \\cite{SPT-3G:2025bzu} are more consistent with those of Planck.}\n\n\n\n\nThe K\\\"ahler potential in Eq.~(\\ref{nsK}) corresponds to a maximally-symmetric field space manifold with curvature $\\mathcal{R} = 2/3$. As we indicated above, this can be mapped to the $R+R^2$ theory in the Jordan frame where SM fields are conformally coupled to (spacetime) curvature. \nIn this case, however, as we have already seen, the inflaton decay channel to two Higgs bosons vanishes\nwhen $\\xi = 1/6$ up to a contribution from the coupling of the inflaton to the Higgs potential, which leads to a decay rate suppressed by $(m_H/M_P)^2$. \nIn the no-scale framework, we expect (and will show below) that the couplings of the inflaton to matter either vanish or are exceedingly small \\cite{Endo:2006xg,egno4,Ema:2024sit}. The curvature of the field space manifold can be easily altered while maintaining\na constant value by shifting the coefficient of the $\\log$ in Eq.~(\\ref{nsK}) from $-3$ to $-3\\alpha$ in which case the curvature becomes $\\mathcal{R} = 2/3\\alpha$. As we show in the next Section, this has dramatic effects on the possible decay channels for the inflaton. \n\nA comprehensive study of the possible inflaton decay channels was performed in \\cite{egno4}. \nBoth $C$-type (referred to as an untwisted matter inflaton) and $T$-type inflation were considered. For $C$-type inflation, in the absence of a direct coupling of $C$ to SM fields in the superpotential, all tree-level decay channels vanish. However a coupling of the type $HLC$ in the superpotential (where $L$ denotes a lepton supermultiplet and $C$ is associated with a right-handed neutrino) can lead to a significant decay rate and sufficient reheating \\cite{eno8}.~\\footnote{There the association with the right-handed sneutrino was made to a related field in the symmetric basis where $T+{\\bar T} - C {\\bar C}/3 \\to 1-y_0 {\\bar y_0}/3 - y {\\bar y}/3$. This basis will be discussed in more detail in Section \\ref{sec:T-gauge}. } Alternatively a modification of the gauge kinetic function that is dependent on $C$ can allow for decays to gauge bosons and gauginos \\cite{Endo:2006xg,Kallosh:2011qk,egno4}. In contrast, when the inflaton is associated with the volume modulus $T$, tree-level couplings to the SM are non-zero. However, they typically lead to very small decay rates (and low reheating temperatures). For example, the decay to two Higgs bosons is present, but its coupling is suppressed by $(\\mu_H/M_P)^2$, where $\\mu_H$ is the supersymmetric bilinear Higgs mass term. For $\\mu_H \\sim 1$~TeV, the reheating temperature is only of order 0.1 eV. Here we will restrict attention to $T$-type inflation. \nThe study in \\cite{egno4} was restricted to $\\alpha = 1$. Viable models for inflation can be constructed in no-scale supergravity for $\\alpha \\ne 1$ \\cite{EGOV} and impact of these models on reheating is discussed in the next Section.\n \n\n\n\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \n\\section{Inflaton decays and reheating}\n\\label{sec:infldecay}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \n\nAt the tree level, one generally expects inflaton decays to all SM fields through supergravity couplings \\cite{Endo:2006qk}. However, these couplings vanish for the special case of no-scale supergravity with a K\\\"ahler potential defined by Eq.~(\\ref{nsK}) \\cite{Endo:2006xg}. \nHere we extend the analysis in \\cite{egno4} to generalized no-scale models with\n$\\mathcal{R}=2/(3\\alpha)$. For $\\alpha = 1$,\nthe no-scale supergravity model can be seen as a supersymmetrization of the Starobinsky model (see the discussion in Section~\\ref{sec:R3}). \nAlthough the direct correspondence with an $F(R)$ theory is generally lost for $\\alpha\\neq1$ (see the discussion in the Appendix), these models\nprovide the standard supergravity realization of $\\alpha$-attractor\ninflation. We show that the tree-level matter-coupling cancellation\npresent in the minimal $\\alpha=1$ model is generally absent for\n$\\alpha\\neq1$, although it may persist for special choices of the\nmatter-field modular weights.\n\nWe take the visible-sector K\\\"ahler potential in Planck units to be\n\\begin{equation}\nK\n\\;=\\;\n-3\\alpha \\,\n\\ln\\!\\left[\nT+\\bar T\n\\;-\\;\n\\frac{1}{3}\\sum_i |\\phi_i|^{2}\n\\right]\n\\;+\\;\n\\sum_a\n\\frac{|\\varphi_a|^{2}}{(T+\\bar T)^{n_a}}\\,,\n\\label{eq:K-alpha-decays}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere the fields $\\phi_i$ are untwisted matter fields appearing inside the no-scale logarithm, and the $\\varphi_a$ are twisted fields with modular weights $n_a$. The stabilizing field $C$ can be associated with one of the $\\phi_i$. e.g., $\\phi_0$. The dilaton $S$ and the remaining moduli are assumed to be stabilized at a higher scale and decoupled from the inflationary dynamics. \n\nStarobinsky-like inflation can be obtained for $\\alpha \\ne 1$ assuming a superpotential of the form \\cite{EGOV}\n\\beq\nW= A \\sqrt{\\lambda} M_P^2 C \\left(\\frac{2T}{M_P}\\right) f\\left(\\frac{T}{M_P}\\right) \\, ,\n\\label{simpT}\n\\eeq\nwith the specific choice \n\\beq\nf(T/M_P) = \\left(1-\\frac{M_P}{2T} \\right) \\left(\\frac{T}{M_P} \\right)^{(3 \\alpha -3)/2} \\, ,\n\\label{femodel}\n\\eeq\nand $A^2 = 3 \\cdot 2^{(3\\alpha-5)} \\alpha$.\nUsing Eq.~(\\ref{simpT}), the general form of the potential is \n\\beq\nV = 4 A^2 \\lambda M_P^4 \\frac{|T/M_P|^2 |f(T/M_P)|^2}{\\alpha (T/M_P+{\\bar T}/M_P)^{3\\alpha-1}} \\, ,\n\\eeq\nwhen one fixes $C = 0$. For $f(T)$ given in Eq.~(\\ref{femodel}), we recover the Starobinsky-like potential~\\cite{e-m}:\n\\begin{align}\nV & \\; = \\; \\frac{3}{4} \\lambda M_{P}^{4}\\left(1-e^{-\\sqrt{\\frac{2}{3 \\alpha}} \\frac{\\phi}{M_{P}}}\\right)^{2} \\, ,\n\\label{eq:emodel}\n\\end{align}\nwhere\nthe canonical inflaton is given by \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{eq:tcanonicalfield}\nT = \\bar{T} = \\frac{1}{2}e^{\\sqrt{\\frac{2}{3\\alpha}} \\frac{\\phi}{M_P}}\\,.\n\\end{equation}\n\nWe now discuss the perturbative decays of the inflaton when it is identified with the real part of the volume modulus $T$. \nThe original analysis of the decay channels at the $\\alpha=1$ no-scale point was given in Ref.~\\cite{egno4}. Here we generalize the analysis to arbitrary $\\alpha$. In the next Section we will apply these results to the ANR model, for which $\\alpha_{\\rm ANR}=2/3$.\n\nAs noted above, in the $\\alpha=1$ no-scale limit, the modulus does not have unsuppressed tree-level decays into untwisted matter fields~\\cite{egno4}. The same cancellation occurs for twisted fields whose modular weights reproduce the conformal value $n_I+n_J+n_K=3$ (see the discussion and expressions below). This is\nthe supergravity counterpart of the vanishing of the scalaron decay amplitude\ninto conformally coupled scalars in the Jordan-frame description of the $R+R^2$ model~\\cite{eno9,building}. The cancellation may be lifted by departing from $\\alpha=1$, by introducing matter with modular weights $n_a\\neq 1$, by adding a nontrivial gauge kinetic function, or by the \nsuper-Weyl anomalies that generate radiative couplings of $T$ to the gauge sector. We address each of these in turn.\n\n\n\nAt $\\phi_i=\\varphi_a=0$, the modulus kinetic term is\n\\begin{equation}\n{\\cal L}_{\\rm kin}\n\\;=\\;\n-\\,3\\alpha M_P^2\\,\n\\frac{\\partial_\\mu T\\,\\partial^{\\mu}\\bar T}{(T+\\bar T)^{2}}\\,.\n\\end{equation}\nAlong the real trajectory we introduce the canonically-normalized real\nmodulus fluctuation $\\delta T$ via\n\\begin{equation}\nT+\\bar T\n\\;=\\;\n\\exp\\!\\left[\n\\sqrt{\\frac{2}{3\\alpha}}\\,\\delta T\n\\right]\\,,\n\\qquad\n\\langle T+\\bar T\\rangle=1\\,,\n\\label{eq:T-canonical-decay}\n\\end{equation}\nso that, linearizing around the vacuum,\n\\begin{equation}\nT+\\bar T\n\\;=\\;\n1+\\sqrt{\\frac{2}{3\\alpha}}\\,\\delta T\n+\\frac{1}{3\\alpha}\\delta T^{\\,2}\n+\\cdots .\n\\label{eq:TpTbar-exp}\n\\end{equation}\nThroughout this Section, $\\delta T$ denotes the canonically-normalized real modulus fluctuation in reduced Planck units. The physical inflaton mass at the vacuum is denoted $m_{\\delta T}\\equiv m= \\sqrt{\\lambda/\\alpha} M_P$.\n\nExpanding (\\ref{eq:K-alpha-decays}) at the vacuum shows that untwisted matter fields acquire an effective modular weight $n=1$ after canonical rescaling. Indeed, at quadratic order in matter,\n\\begin{equation}\nK\n\\;\\supset\\;\n\\frac{\\alpha\\,\\phi_i\\bar\\phi_i}{T+\\bar T}\n\\;+\\;\\cdots\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nso after the constant rescaling $\\phi_i^{\\,c}=\\sqrt{\\alpha}\\,\\phi_i$, the matter K\\\"ahler metric reduces to\n\\begin{equation}\nK_{i{\\bar i}} \\equiv Z_i(T,\\bar T)\n\\;=\\;\n(T+\\bar T)^{-1}\\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $K_{i{\\bar i}} = \\partial^2 K/\\partial \\phi_i \\partial {\\bar \\phi}_i$.\nThus, as far as the $T$-dependence of decay amplitudes is concerned,\nuntwisted matter is accounted for by setting\n\\begin{equation}\nn_I\\;=\\;1\\,,\n\\end{equation}\ni.e., identical to a twisted field with unit modular weight. This identification\nholds independently of $\\alpha$ and is the natural extension of the\n$\\alpha=1$ rule of Ref.~\\cite{egno4}.\n\nThe visible sector superpotential is assumed to contain ordinary matter couplings,\n\\begin{equation}\nW_{\\rm vis}\n\\;=\\;\n\\frac{1}{2}\\,\\mu^{IJ}\\Phi_{I}\\Phi_{J}\n\\,+\\,\n\\frac{1}{6}\\,Y^{IJK}\\Phi_{I}\\Phi_{J}\\Phi_{K}\n\\,+\\,\\cdots\\,,\n\\label{eq:Wvis-decays}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\Phi_I$ denotes either an untwisted or twisted visible multiplet, and\nthe modular weight $n_I$ of each $\\Phi_I$ is fixed as discussed above. We\nassume that $W_{\\rm vis}$ has no explicit dependence on $T$, which is the\nsequestered case relevant for the no-scale cancellation. Explicit\n$T$-dependence in $W_{\\rm vis}$ would generate additional model-dependent\ndecay channels along the lines of Eq.~(5.50) of Ref.~\\cite{egno4}, and is not included in the minimal rates below.\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \n\\subsection{Effective interaction Lagrangians}\n\\label{sec:T-Leff}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \nAfter canonically normalizing the matter fields at the vacuum and expanding in $\\delta T$, we obtain the linear in $\\delta T$ effective interaction Lagrangian to all orders in the matter fields. The fermion sector reads \n\\begin{align}\n{\\cal L}_{F,{\\rm eff}}\n&=\n-\\,\\frac{\\delta T}{2\\sqrt{3\\alpha}}\n\\bigl(n_I+n_J-3\\alpha\\bigr)\\,W^{IJ}\\,\n\\bar\\chi_{I,L}\\chi_{J,R}\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&\\quad\n-\\,\\frac{\\delta T}{2\\sqrt{3\\alpha}}\n\\bigl(n_I+n_J+n_K-3\\alpha\\bigr)\\,W^{IJK}\\,\n\\bar\\chi_{I,L}\\chi_{J,R}\\Phi_K\n\\;+\\;{\\rm h.c.}+\\cdots ,\n\\label{eq:LF-eff-alpha}\n\\end{align}\nand the bosonic sector is\n\\begin{align}\n\\mathcal{L}_{B,\\mathrm{eff}}\n=&\n-\\frac{\\delta T}{\\sqrt{3\\alpha}}\\,\n\\left(n_I+n_L-3\\alpha\\right)\nW^{IL}\\bar W_{LJ}\\Phi_I\\bar\\Phi^J\n\\nonumber\\\\[0.5em]\n&-\\frac{\\delta T}{2\\sqrt{3\\alpha}}\\,\n\\left(n_I+n_L-3\\alpha\\right)\nW^{IL}\\bar W_{LJK}\\Phi_I\\bar\\Phi^J\\bar\\Phi^K\n\\nonumber\\\\[0.5em]\n&-\\frac{\\delta T}{2\\sqrt{3\\alpha}}\\,\n\\left(n_I+n_J+n_L-3\\alpha\\right)\nW^{IJL}\\bar W_{LK}\\Phi_I\\Phi_J\\bar\\Phi^K\n\\nonumber\\\\[0.5em]\n&-\\frac{\\delta T}{\\sqrt{3\\alpha}}\\,\n\\left(n_J+n_L-3\\alpha\\right)\nW^{JL}\\bar W_{LK}\\Phi_I\\Phi_J\\bar\\Phi^I\\bar\\Phi^K\n\\nonumber\\\\[0.5em]\n&-\\frac{\\delta T}{6\\sqrt{3\\alpha}}\\,\n\\left(n_I+n_L-3\\alpha\\right)\nW^{IL}\\bar W_{LJKM}\\Phi_I\\bar\\Phi^J\\bar\\Phi^K\\bar\\Phi^M\n\\nonumber\\\\[0.5em]\n&-\\frac{\\delta T}{4\\sqrt{3\\alpha}}\\,\n\\left(n_I+n_J+n_L-3\\alpha\\right)\nW^{IJL}\\bar W_{LKM}\\Phi_I\\Phi_J\\bar\\Phi^K\\bar\\Phi^M\n\\nonumber\\\\[0.5em]\n&-\\frac{\\delta T}{6\\sqrt{3\\alpha}}\\,\n\\left(n_I+n_J+n_K+n_L-3\\alpha\\right)\nW^{IJKL}\\bar W_{LM}\\Phi_I\\Phi_J\\Phi_K\\bar\\Phi^M \n\\nonumber\\\\[0.5em]\n&-\\frac{\\delta T}{12\\sqrt{3\\alpha}}\\,\n\\left(n_I+n_J-3\\alpha\\right)\n\\left[\n9\\alpha+\n\\left(n_I+n_J-1\\right)\n\\left(n_K+n_M-3\\alpha\\right)\n\\right]\nW^{IJ}\\bar W_{KM}\\Phi_I\\Phi_J\\bar\\Phi^K\\bar\\Phi^M \\label{eq:LB-eff-alpha} \\\\\n& +\\cdots \\nonumber.\n\\end{align}\nThe displayed terms generate the two-, three-, and four-body scalar decay channels, and generalize the eight operators of Eq.~(5.40) of Ref.~\\cite{egno4} from $\\alpha=1$ to arbitrary $\\alpha$, with the universal coefficient combinations\n\\begin{equation}\nn_I+n_J-3\\alpha\\,,\n\\qquad\nn_I+n_J+n_K-3\\alpha\\,,\n\\qquad\nn_I+n_J+n_K+n_L-3\\alpha\\,,\n\\label{eq:no-scale-combinations}\n\\end{equation}\nwhich encode the residual no-scale cancellation.\n\nFor $\\alpha=1$ and matter fields with modular weight $n_I=1$, every combination in (\\ref{eq:no-scale-combinations}) reduces to the form $n_I+n_J+\\cdots+n_L-3$ in \\cite{egno4}, and in particular vanishes for a trilinear Yukawa interaction among three untwisted fields:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\bigl(n_I+n_J+n_K-3\\bigr)\\big|_{n=1}=0\\,.\n\\end{equation}\nThis recovers the conformal cancellation noted in Eq.~(5.40) of Ref.~\\cite{egno4}. Twisted fields with modular weights arranged such that the relevant sum equals $3\\alpha$ are similarly suppressed. \n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\subsection{Decays to matter scalars}\n\\label{sec:T-scalars}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\nWe next examine in more detail the possible decay modes for the inflaton, beginning with decays to matter scalars. \nThe two-body scalar decay $\\delta T \\to \\Phi_I\\bar\\Phi^J$ proceeds via the first term of (\\ref{eq:LB-eff-alpha}). Assuming negligible final-state masses relative to $m$, the partial width is\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Gamma\\bigl(\\delta T \\to \\Phi_I\\bar\\Phi^J\\bigr)\n\\;=\\;\n\\frac{\\bigl(n_I+n_L-3\\alpha\\bigr)^{2}}{\\alpha}\n\\frac{\\bigl|W^{IL}\\bar W_{LJ}\\bigr|^{2}}{48\\pi\\,m\\,M_{P}^{2}}\\,.\n\\label{eq:Gamma-2body-scalar}\n\\end{equation}\nAs discussed in \\cite{egno4}, this rate is proportional to the fourth power of the\nbilinear coupling: for a Higgsino mass term $W \\supset \\mu_H H_uH_d$ it\nyields a contribution suppressed by $|\\mu_H|^{4}/(mM_{P}^{2})$ and is\nphenomenologically negligible for $|\\mu_H|\\ll m$. Nevertheless, this channel can be important in models of high-scale supersymmetry \\cite{Dudas:2017kfz,Kaneta:2019yjn}.\n\nThe three-body decays into scalars come in two topologies:\n\\begin{align}\n\\Gamma\\bigl(\\delta T\\to \\Phi_I\\bar\\Phi^{J}\\bar\\Phi^{K}\\bigr)\n&=\n\\frac{(n_I+n_L-3\\alpha)^{2}}{\\alpha}\\,\n\\frac{\\bigl|W^{IL}\\bar W_{LJK}\\bigr|^{2}\\,m}{12(8\\pi)^{3}\\,M_{P}^{2}}\\,,\n\\label{eq:Gamma-3body-scalar-A}\\\\[4pt]\n\\Gamma\\bigl(\\delta T\\to \\Phi_I\\Phi_J\\bar\\Phi^{K}\\bigr)\n&=\n\\frac{(n_I+n_J+n_L-3\\alpha)^{2}}{\\alpha}\\,\n\\frac{\\bigl|W^{IJL}\\bar W_{LK}\\bigr|^{2}\\,m}{12(8\\pi)^{3}\\,M_{P}^{2}}\\,,\n\\label{eq:Gamma-3body-scalar-B}\n\\end{align}\neach of which involves the insertion of one bilinear superpotential term and one trilinear term.\nThese channels are suppressed by the square of the\nbilinear coupling and lead to MeV reheating temperatures for $\\mu_H$ of order 1 TeV. These are subleading relative to the corresponding four-scalar mode below,\nwhich is unsuppressed by visible-sector masses.\n\nThe four-scalar decay rate, dominated by the trilinear-trilinear coupling,\nis\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Gamma\\bigl(\\delta T \\to \\Phi_I\\Phi_J\\bar\\Phi^{K}\\bar\\Phi^{M}\\bigr)\n\\;=\\;\n\\frac{(n_I+n_J+n_L-3\\alpha)^{2}}{\\alpha}\\,\n\\frac{\\bigl|W^{IJL}\\bar W_{LKM}\\bigr|^{2}\\,m^{3}}{72(8\\pi)^{5}\\,M_{P}^{2}}\\,,\n\\label{eq:Gamma-4body-scalar}\n\\end{equation}\nwhich generalizes Eq.~(5.46) of \\cite{egno4} for general $\\alpha$. This channel can provide reheating temperatures as large as $\\mathcal{O}(10^7)$~GeV so long as $n_I + n_J + n_K - 3\\alpha \\ne 0$. However, for $\\alpha = 1$ and untwisted matter fields (or twisted matter fields with $n_i = 1$), this rate also vanishes. Because this is a four-body channel, this width is suppressed relative to the three-body rate with fermions in the final state. \n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\subsection{Decays to matter fermions}\n\\label{sec:T-fermions}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\nThe two-body fermion decay $\\delta T \\to \\bar\\chi_I\\chi_J$ is mediated by\nthe first term of (\\ref{eq:LF-eff-alpha}) and is the dominant bilinear\nchannel. Once again neglecting the final state masses, the decay width for this channel is\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Gamma\\bigl(\\delta T \\to \\bar\\chi_I\\chi_J\\bigr)\n\\;=\\;\n\\frac{(n_I+n_J-3\\alpha)^{2}}{\\alpha}\\,\n\\frac{|W^{IJ}|^{2}\\,m}{192\\pi\\,M_{P}^{2}}\\,.\n\\label{eq:Gamma-2body-fermion}\n\\end{equation}\nFor a Higgsino mass term $W\\supset \\mu_H H_uH_d$, taking the Higgses to be\nuntwisted (so $n_{H_u}=n_{H_d}=1$), this becomes\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Gamma\\bigl(\\delta T \\to \\widetilde H_u^{0}\\widetilde H_d^{0}\\bigr)\n\\;=\\;\n\\frac{(2-3\\alpha)^{2}}{\\alpha}\\,\n\\frac{|\\mu_H|^{2}\\,m}{192\\pi\\,M_{P}^{2}}\\,.\n\\label{eq:Gamma-mu-alpha}\n\\end{equation}\nIf $\\alpha=1$ the coefficient $(2-3\\alpha)^{2}/\\alpha=1$ does not\nvanish, but the rate is suppressed by $|\\mu_H|^{2}/m^{2}$ relative to the\nunsuppressed gravitational scale $m^{3}/M_P^{2}$. It therefore provides only\na small reheating floor (of order 10 MeV) and is subdominant to the trilinear channels in any\nrealistic spectrum.\n\nThe dominant fermionic decay is the three-body trilinear decay\n$\\delta T \\to \\bar\\chi_I\\chi_J\\Phi_K$, with partial width\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Gamma\\bigl(\\delta T \\to \\bar\\chi_I\\chi_J\\Phi_K\\bigr)\n\\;=\\;\n\\frac{(n_I+n_J+n_K-3\\alpha)^{2}}{\\alpha}\\,\n\\frac{|W^{IJK}|^{2}\\,m^{3}}{36(8\\pi)^{3}\\,M_{P}^{2}}\\,.\n\\label{eq:Gamma-3body-fermion}\n\\end{equation}\nThe corresponding scalar three-body widths (\\ref{eq:Gamma-3body-scalar-B})\nand (\\ref{eq:Gamma-4body-scalar}) combine with this fermion mode into the\ntotal three-body Yukawa channel.\nIn the case of the top Yukawa coupling, and taking the three fields to be untwisted with\n$n_{Q_3}=n_{H_u}=n_{\\bar u_3}=1$, the relevant coefficient in brackets is\n\\begin{equation}\nn_{Q_3}+n_{H_u}+n_{\\bar u_3}-3\\alpha\n\\;=\\;\n3(1-\\alpha)\\,,\n\\label{eq:top-coeff-alpha}\n\\end{equation}\ngiving the combined three-body partial width\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Gamma(\\delta T \\rightarrow H_u^0t_L\\bar{t}_R, \\, \\tilde{t}_L\\tilde{H}_u^0\\bar{t}_R, \\, \\bar{\\tilde{t}}_R t_L\\tilde{H}_u^0)\n\\;=\\;\n\\frac{3(1-\\alpha)^{2}}{\\alpha}\\,\n\\frac{|y_t|^{2}\\,m^{3}}{4(8\\pi)^{3}\\,M_{P}^{2}}\\,.\n\\label{eq:Gamma-top-alpha}\n\\end{equation}\nThe rate (\\ref{eq:Gamma-top-alpha}) vanishes at $\\alpha=1$, in agreement with\n\\cite{egno4}, but is otherwise determined entirely by the K\\\"ahler geometry once the\nmatter assignments are fixed. Equation (\\ref{eq:Gamma-top-alpha}) is the\ncentral result of this Section for $\\alpha\\neq 1$. This channel can produce reheating temperatures of order $10^8$~GeV. \n\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\subsection{Reheating}\n\\label{sec:reheating}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\nThe predictions for the CMB observables depend not only on the inflationary potential, but also on the post-inflationary expansion history. In particular, the value of the inflaton field at horizon exit is fixed by the number of e-folds $N_*$ between the exit from the pivot mode and the end of inflation, and $N_*$ depends logarithmically on the duration of reheating. We follow the treatment of~\\cite{EGOV}, replacing the phenomenological inflaton decay rate used there by the decay rate derived from the no-scale matter couplings derived in the previous subsections.\n\nFor the $\\alpha$-Starobinsky potential (\\ref{eq:emodel}), the inflaton mass at the minimum is $m = \\sqrt{\\frac{\\lambda}{\\alpha}}M_P.$ The normalization $\\lambda$ is fixed for every value of $\\alpha$ by the measured scalar amplitude, as in Eq.~(\\ref{As}). A good approximation for $\\lambda$ was given in \\cite{Ellis:2021kad}\n\\beq\n\\lambda \\simeq \\frac{24 \\alpha \\pi^2 A_s}{N_*^2} \\, .\n\\label{lapprox}\n\\eeq\nThus, to leading order in the attractor expansion, the explicit $\\alpha$-dependence cancels from the inflaton mass. The principal $\\alpha$-dependence of reheating therefore arises from the decay amplitude rather than from $m$, although the exact numerical result retains a mild additional dependence through the CMB normalization and the finite-$N_*$ dynamics.\n\nUsing the results from the previous subsection, the dominant decay channel is into the scalar--fermion final states associated with the top Yukawa coupling, given by Eq.~(\\ref{eq:Gamma-top-alpha}).\nCompared with the phenomenological parametrization\n\\begin{equation}\n \\Gamma_\\phi \\; = \\; \n\\frac{y_{\\rm eff}^2}{8\\pi}\\,m \n\\label{eq:y-effective-definition}\n\\end{equation}\nused in \\cite{EGOV}, Eq.~\\eqref{eq:Gamma-top-alpha} corresponds to\n\\begin{equation}\ny_{\\rm eff}^{\\rm top}\n=\n\\frac{\\sqrt{3}}{16\\pi}\n\\frac{|1-\\alpha|}{\\sqrt{\\alpha}}\\,\n|y_t|\\frac{m}{M_P}\n\\label{eq:y-effective-top}\n\\end{equation}\nwhen $\\alpha \\ne 1$.\nAt $\\alpha = 1$, however, Eq.~\\eqref{eq:Gamma-top-alpha} vanishes exactly, and the reheating history is instead determined by the anomaly--induced decays to gauge bosons and gauginos (see Eq.~(\\ref{anomD}) and its no-scale analogue in Section \\ref{sec:T-gauge}). \n\nPerturbative reheating can be described by\nthe coupled equations \\cite{GKMO2}\n\\begin{align}\n\\dot\\rho_\\phi\n+\n3H\\bigl(1+w_\\phi\\bigr)\\rho_\\phi\n&=\n- \\bigl(1+w_\\phi\\bigr) \\Gamma_\\phi\\rho_\\phi \\, ,\n\\label{eq:rho-phi-reheating}\n\\\\\n\\dot\\rho_R+4H\\rho_R\n&=\n\\bigl(1+w_\\phi\\bigr) \\Gamma_\\phi\\rho_\\phi \\, ,\n\\label{eq:rho-R-reheating}\n\\\\\n3M_P^2H^2\n&=\n\\rho_\\phi+\\rho_R \\, .\n\\label{eq:Friedmann-reheating}\n\\end{align}\nNear its minimum the potential in\nEq.~\\eqref{eq:emodel} is quadratic. The coherently\noscillating inflaton condensate therefore has $\\langle w_\\phi\\rangle\\simeq0$, and behaves as nonrelativistic matter until its decay products dominate. Initially, $\\rho_\\phi\\propto a^{-3}$, whereas the continuously\nproduced radiation approaches the familiar scaling\n$\\rho_R\\propto a^{-3/2}$, or $T\\propto a^{-3/8}$, during the inflaton-dominated phase \\cite{Scherrer:1984fd,Giudice:2000ex,GKMO1,GKMO2}.\n\nWe define the completion of reheating when the energy density in radiation is equal to that in the inflaton condensate,\nfor which the reheating temperature is given by Eq.~(\\ref{TRH}). \nEquivalently,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\trh\n=\n\\left(\n\\frac{72}{5\\pi^2g_{\\rm RH}}\n\\right)^{1/4}\n\\sqrt{\\Gamma_\\phi M_P} \\, .\n\\label{eq:Treh-Gamma}\n\\end{equation}\nWhen the top channel dominates, and we sum over the three final states and include color factors, this gives \n\\begin{align}\n\\trh^{\\rm top}\n={}&\n\\left(\n\\frac{72}{5\\pi^2g_{\\rm RH}}\n\\right)^{1/4}\n\\left[\n\\frac{\n\\left(\nn_{Q_3}\n+n_{H_u}\n+n_{\\bar u_3}\n-3\\alpha\n\\right)^2\n}{4\\alpha}\n\\right]^{1/2}\\times\n\\frac{|y_t|\\,m^{3/2}}\n{(8\\pi)^{3/2}M_P^{1/2}} \\, .\n\\label{eq:Treh-top-general}\n\\end{align}\nFor $n_i = 1$, the parametric dependence for $\\trh$ becomes\n\\begin{equation}\n\\trh^{\\rm top}\n\\propto\n\\frac{|1-\\alpha|}{\\sqrt{\\alpha}}\\,\n|y_t|\\,\\frac{m^{3/2}}{M_P^{1/2}} \\, .\n\\label{eq:Treh-alpha-scaling}\n\\end{equation}\nSince $m$ is approximately independent of $\\alpha$ after imposing the CMB normalization, this expression makes the dominant geometrical dependence explicit.\n\n\nAssuming no entropy production after reheating, the number of e-folds at the pivot scale is~\\cite{LiddleLeach,Martin:2010kz,Ellis:2021kad,EGOV}\n\\begin{align}\nN_*\n={}&\n\\ln\\left[\n\\frac{1}{\\sqrt{3}}\n\\left(\\frac{\\pi^2}{30}\\right)^{1/4}\n\\left(\\frac{43}{11}\\right)^{1/3}\n\\frac{T_0}{H_0}\n\\right]\n-\n\\ln\\left(\\frac{k_*}{a_0H_0}\\right)\n-\n\\frac{1}{12}\\ln g_{\\rm RH}\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&+\n\\frac14\n\\ln\\left(\n\\frac{V_*^2}{M_P^4\\rho_{\\rm end}}\n\\right)\n+\n\\frac{1-3w_{\\rm int}}\n{12(1+w_{\\rm int})}\n\\ln\\left(\n\\frac{\\rho_{\\rm rad}}{\\rho_{\\rm end}}\n\\right) \\, ,\n\\label{eq:Nstar-reheating-matching}\n\\end{align}\nwhere $\\rho_{\\rm end} = \\frac32 V(\\phi_{\\rm end})$ is the energy density at the end of inflation,\n$\\rho_{\\rm rad} = \\rho_{\\rm R}(\\trh)$ is the energy density at the onset of radiation\ndomination, and\n\\begin{equation}\nw_{\\rm int}\n\\equiv\n\\frac{1}{N_{\\rm rad}-N_{\\rm end}}\n\\int_{N_{\\rm end}}^{N_{\\rm rad}}\nw(N)\\,dN\n\\label{eq:wint-definition}\n\\end{equation}\nis the equation-of-state parameter averaged over reheating. For the quadratic minimum considered here, $w_{\\rm int}$ is close to zero, but we determine it together with $\\rho_{\\rm rad}$ by solving Eqs.~\\eqref{eq:rho-phi-reheating}--\\eqref{eq:Friedmann-reheating}.\n\nFor each value of $\\alpha$, we begin with an initial estimate of $N_*$ and determine the corresponding horizon-exit field value\n$\\phi_*$ from\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{eq:efolds}\nN_{*} \\; = \\; \\int_{t_*}^{t_{\\rm end}} H \\, dt \\; \\simeq \\; \\frac{1}{M_{P}^{2}} \\int_{\\phi_{\\mathrm{end}}}^{\\phi_{*}} \\frac{V(\\phi)}{V'(\\phi)} d \\phi \n\\; \\simeq \\; \\int_{\\phi_{\\mathrm{end}}}^{\\phi_{*}} \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{2 \\epsilon}} \\frac{d \\phi}{M_{P}}\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nWe then fix $\\lambda$ from the observed scalar\namplitude $A_s$ using Eq.~\\eqref{As} (or the approximation given in Eq.~(\\ref{lapprox}), compute the inflaton\nmass $m$ and the top-Yukawa decay width $\\Gamma_{\\rm top}(\\alpha)$ from Eq.~\\eqref{eq:Gamma-top-alpha}, and evolve the coupled inflaton and radiation densities through reheating. From this evolution, we determine $w_{\\rm int}$ and $\\rho_{\\rm rad}$, update $N_*$ using Eq.~\\eqref{eq:Nstar-reheating-matching}, and repeat the procedure until $N_*$ converges.\nOnce $N_*$ and $\\phi_*$ are known, the inflationary observables, $n_s$ and $r$ can be computed using Eq.~(\\ref{ns}).\n\n\nThis produces the curve in the $(n_s,r)$ plane shown in\nFig.~\\ref{fig:nsrplot1}. Each point on the black line corresponds to a different value of $\\alpha$, with the normalization and reheating history calculated as described above. The point $\\alpha=1$ requires special treatment because the top-Yukawa decay width vanishes there. Its location is evaluated using the anomaly--induced decay channel given by Eq.~(\\ref{anomD}) and discussed in Section~\\ref{sec:T-gauge}. %We also highlight the ANR model value of $\\alpha_{\\rm ANR} = 2/3$ discussed in the next Section. \nFor $\\alpha\\neq1$, the top-Yukawa channel provides the direct link between the no-scale K\\\"ahler geometry, the reheating temperature, and the location of the inflationary prediction in the observational $(n_s,r)$ plane.\n\n\\begin{figure}[ht!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.8\\linewidth]{figures/nsrplot1.pdf}\n \\caption{Predictions for the CMB observables $(n_s,r)$ in the generalized no-scale supergravity model of Eq.~\\eqref{eq:K-alpha-decays}, shown as a function of $\\alpha$ (black line). The shadings indicate the regions of parameter space favored at the 68 and 95\\% C.L. by {\\it Planck} \\cite{Planck}, the combination of {\\it Planck}, ACT lensing, and DESI DR6 BAO data (P-ACT-LB) \\cite{AtacamaCosmologyTelescope:2025blo}, and the combination of SPT, {\\it Planck}, ACT and BICEP/Keck data \\cite{SPT-3G:2025bzu,Balkenhol:2025wms} (labeled SPA + BK). The points corresponding to $\\alpha=1$ and $\\alpha=20$ are indicated explicitly.}\n \\label{fig:nsrplot1}\n\\end{figure}\n\nWe emphasize one key difference between this result and the recent analysis in \\cite{EGOV}. In the latter, $\\alpha$-attractor models with a potential given by Eq.~(\\ref{eq:emodel}) were considered and the inflationary observables were computed as a function of $\\alpha$ and independently $\\trh$. This resulted in a series of (nearly parallel) trajectories with varying $\\alpha$ for each assumed reheating temperature. However, in the context of no-scale supergravity, we see that the reheating \nis determined by $\\alpha$ from Eq.~(\\ref{eq:Treh-alpha-scaling}) for $\\alpha \\ne 1$, or by the decay of the inflaton to gauge bosons through the coupling of the trace anomaly for $\\alpha = 1$. This results in the single trajectory shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:nsrplot1}.\n\nFor the range\n\\begin{equation}\n0.01 \\leq \\alpha \\leq 20,\n\\end{equation}\nthe corresponding reheating temperatures span approximately\n\\begin{equation}\n2.3\\times10^{8}\\ {\\rm GeV}\n\\lesssim\n\\trh\n\\lesssim\n2.5\\times10^{11}\\ {\\rm GeV},\n\\end{equation}\nwith the minimum occurring near $\\alpha=1$, where reheating is\ncontrolled by the trace-anomaly channel, and the maximum occurring when $\\alpha = 0.01$. The points $\\alpha=1$ and $\\alpha=20$ are indicated explicitly in Fig.~\\ref{fig:nsrplot1}.\n\nThe trajectory in Fig.~\\ref{fig:nsrplot1} is compared with recent experimental results.\nWe note that the no-scale model prediction is consistent with the {\\it Planck} data~\\cite{Planck} (shown by the blue shaded region) for $\\alpha \\le 20$ at the 95\\% C.L.. For a limited range of $\\alpha > 1$, the model is also consistent with {\\it Planck} at the 68\\% C.L. shown by the dark blue shaded region. The model is consistent with the SPT~+~BK combination~\\cite{SPT-3G:2025bzu,Balkenhol:2025wms} (labelled as SPA+BK since it includes Planck and ACT data, and shaded orange) for $1 \\le \\alpha \\le 20$. However, the no-scale prediction lies outside the 95\\% C.L. region of the P-ACT-LB combination~\\cite{AtacamaCosmologyTelescope:2025blo} (shaded purple) for all values of $\\alpha$.\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\section{The ANR model}\n\\label{sec:anr}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\nWe now apply the general results of Section~\\ref{sec:reheating} to the string-derived model of Refs.~\\cite{ANR1,ANR2,ANO}. This model provides an explicit realization of no-scale inflation with $\\alpha_{\\rm ANR}=2/3$. As we will see, the tree-level no-scale cancellations found at $\\alpha=1$ are present in this model as well. However, the model contains a direct coupling of the inflaton to matter allowing for successful reheating. \n\nIn the symmetric field basis, the relevant string K\\\"ahler potential is\n\\begin{equation}\nK_{\\rm string}\n=\n-\\ln(S+\\bar S)\n-2\\ln\\left(1-|y|^2\\right)\n-2\\ln\\left(1-\\frac{|z|^2}{2}\\right) \\, ,\n\\label{eq:ANR-K-yz}\n\\end{equation}\nand the superpotential is \n\\begin{equation}\nW_{\\rm inf}\n=\nmzy(1- {\\hat \\lambda} y) \\, \n\\label{eq:ANR-W-yz}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere ${\\widehat \\lambda}$ is a coupling of $\\mathcal{O}(1)$. \nHere $S$ is the string dilaton, $y$ contains the inflaton, and $z$ contains the goldstino during inflation. This is related to the superpotential in Eq.~(\\ref{CSMs}) with the identification of $z$ with $C$ and setting $\\widehat \\lambda = 1$. Departures from this value of $\\widehat \\lambda$ will produce deformations of the Starobinsky-like potential which may lead to interesting consequences for the inflationary observables, $n_s$ and $r$ \\cite{Antoniadis:2025pfa}. We assume that the dilaton is stabilized and absorb its vacuum expectation value into the definition of the mass parameter $m$. This assumption is sufficient for the discussion of reheating, whose relevant modulus dependence resides in the $y$, or equivalently $T$, sector.\nWe note that the stabilization of $S$ naturally leads to the stabilization of $C$, as is necessary for inflation \\cite{ANO}. \n\nThe supergravity scalar potential\ntakes the form (assuming $\\hat \\lambda = 1$)\n\\begin{align}\nV\n={}&\n\\frac{m^2}{\n\\left(1-|y|^2\\right)^2\n\\left(2-|z|^2\\right)^2}\n\\Bigl[\n4|y|^2|1-y|^2\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&\\quad\n+2|z|^2\n\\left\\{\n1-2(y+\\bar y)+2|y|^2\n+2(y+\\bar y)|y|^2-3|y|^4\n\\right\\}\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&\\quad\n+|y|^2|1-y|^2|z|^4\n\\Bigr] \\, .\n\\label{eq:ANR-full-potential}\n\\end{align}\nAlong the inflationary trajectory,\n\\begin{equation}\n{\\rm Im}\\,y=0 \\, ,\n\\qquad\nz=0 \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nand this expression reduces to \n\\begin{equation}\nV(y_R)\n=\nm^2\\frac{y_R^2}{(1+y_R)^2} \\, ,\n\\qquad\ny_R\\equiv {\\rm Re}\\,y \\, .\n\\label{eq:ANR-potential-y}\n\\end{equation}\nConsequently,\n\\begin{equation}\nV(\\phi)\n=\n\\frac{m^2M_P^2}{4}\n\\left(\n1-e^{-\\phi/M_P}\n\\right)^2 \\, ,\n\\label{eq:ANR-Starobinsky}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\phi$ is again the canonically normalized inflaton.\nThis is equivalent to the $\\alpha$-Starobinsky potential in Eq.~(\\ref{eq:emodel})\nwith $\\alpha=2/3$.\n\n\nIn the $(T,C)$ basis,\nafter the associated K\\\"ahler transformation, the inflationary sector may be\nwritten as\n\\begin{equation}\nK_{\\rm string}\n=\n-\\ln(S+\\bar S)\n-2\\ln(T+\\bar T)\n-2\\ln\\left(1-\\frac{|z|^2}{2}\\right) \\, ,\n\\label{eq:ANR-K-Tz}\n\\end{equation}\nwith\n\\begin{equation}\nW_{\\rm inf}\n=\nmz\\left(T-\\frac{1}{2}\\right) \\, .\n\\label{eq:ANR-W-Tz}\n\\end{equation}\nThe coefficient of the modulus logarithm is therefore $-2=-3\\alpha_{\\rm ANR}$, which makes the identification\n$\\alpha_{\\rm ANR}=2/3$ manifest.\n\nAt $z=0$, the modulus kinetic term is\n\\begin{equation}\n{\\cal L}_{\\rm kin}\n=\n-2M_P^2\n\\frac{\\partial_\\mu T\\partial^\\mu\\bar T}\n{(T+\\bar T)^2} \\, .\n\\label{eq:ANR-T-kinetic}\n\\end{equation}\nAlong the real trajectory, the canonically-normalized inflaton fluctuation is therefore defined by\n\\begin{equation}\nT+\\bar T\n=\n\\exp\\left(\\frac{\\phi}{M_P}\\right) \\, ,\n\\label{eq:ANR-T-canonical}\n\\end{equation}\nin agreement with the general relation\n$T+\\bar T=\\exp[\\sqrt{2/(3\\alpha)}\\,\\phi/M_P]$ evaluated at\n$\\alpha=2/3$.\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\subsection{Matter Fields and Flipped SU(5)}\n\\label{sec:FSU5}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\nThe model \\cite{ANR1,ANR2} is a string-derived version of a flipped SU(5) $\\times$ U(1) grand unified theory (GUT)~\\cite{Barr,DKN,flipped2,AEHN}. \nThis GUT contains three generations of SM\nmatter fields, each with a right-handed neutrino, which are each placed in\n$\\mathbf{10}$ ($F$), $\\bar{\\mathbf{5}}$ ($\\bar f$), and $\\mathbf{1}$ ($\\sigma$) representations of SU(5).\nThe SU(5)$\\times$U(1) GUT group is\nbroken to the SM via\n$\\mathbf{10}+\\overline{\\mathbf{10}}$ Higgs representations of SU(5) ($H+{\\bar H})$. SM symmetry breaking proceeds via electroweak doublets contained\nin $\\mathbf{5}+\\bar{\\mathbf{5}}$ ($h+{\\bar h}$) representations.\nThe superpotential is given by\n\\begin{align} \\notag\nW &= \\lambda_1^{ij} F_iF_jh + \\lambda_2^{ij} F_i\\bar{f}_j\\bar{h} +\n \\lambda_3^{ij}\\bar{f}_i\\ell^c_j h + \\lambda_4 HHh + \\lambda_5\n \\bar{H}\\bar{H}\\bar{h}\\\\ \n&\\quad + \\lambda_6^{ia} F_i\\bar{H}\\sigma_a + \\lambda_7^a h\\bar{h}\\sigma_a\n + \\lambda_8^{abc}\\sigma_a\\sigma_b\\sigma_c + \\mu^{ab}\\sigma_a\\sigma_b\\,, \n\\label{Wgen2} \n\\end{align}\nwhere the indices $i,j$ run over the three fermion families, and we have suppressed gauge group indices.\nThe first 3 terms of the superpotential (\\ref{Wgen2}) correspond to the SM Yukawa couplings. \nThe fourth and fifth terms account for the doublet-triplet separation.\nThe sixth term is related to the neutrino mass matrix. The seventh term is equivalent to the MSSM $\\mu$-term. The last two terms determine the inflationary potential and are related to the superpotential (\\ref{eq:ANR-W-yz}). These terms also enter into the neutrino mass matrix. The cosmology and phenomenology of this model has been explored in some detail \\cite{EGNNO2,EGNNO3,EGNNO4,EGNNO5,EGNNO6, building}. While we will not review the details of the model here, we will pick out the components necessary for reheating. \n\nIn the previous Section, we saw that the dominant contribution to reheating (when $\\alpha \\ne 1$ and/or the modular weights were not all equal to 1) was the trilinear superpotential term providing the top quark Yukawa coupling. This term is contained in the $\\lambda_2$ coupling in (\\ref{Wgen2}) (recall that ${\\bar u}$ is contained in the $\\bar{\\mathbf{5}}$ representation of {\\em flipped} SU(5) as opposed to the $\\mathbf{10}$ in conventional SU(5)). In addition to this coupling, we will also be interested in the $\\lambda_6$ coupling, which contains a direct superpotential coupling of the inflaton (we associate $y$ and $z$ with the singlets $\\sigma_a$) to $\\bar H$ and $\\nu^c$ (contained in $F$). Thus, we will focus here on a limited part of the visible sector, \nnamely that given by \n\\begin{equation}\nW_{\\rm vis}\n=\n\\lambda_2^{33} {\\bar h} Q_3\\bar u_3 + \\lambda_6 \\bar H \\nu^c y \\, .\n\\label{eq:ANR-top-Yukawa}\n\\end{equation}\nIn the string construction \\cite{ANR1}, $\\bar h$ is taken to be a twisted field \nfrom the same sector as $y$, whereas $Q_3$\n$\\bar u_3$, $\\nu^c$, and ${\\bar H}$ are twisted fields whose modular weights are associated with\nthe untwisted $z$ sector. The relevant K\\\"ahler potential may therefore be written\nas\n\\begin{align}\nK_{\\rm string}\n={}&\n-\\ln(S+\\bar S)\n-2\\ln\\left(\n1-|y|^2-|{\\bar h}|^2\n\\right)\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&-\n2\\ln\\left(\n1-\\frac{|z|^2}{2}\n\\right)\n+\n\\frac{|Q_3|^2}\n{\\left(1-\\frac{|z|^2}{2}\\right)}\n+\n\\frac{|\\bar u_3|^2}\n{\\left(1-\\frac{|z|^2}{2}\\right)}\n+\n\\frac{|\\nu^c|^2}\n{\\left(1-\\frac{|z|^2}{2}\\right)}\n+\n\\frac{|{\\bar H}|^2}\n{\\left(1-\\frac{|z|^2}{2}\\right)} \\, .\n\\label{eq:ANR-K-visible-yz}\n\\end{align}\nThe modular weights $n_{Q_3}=n_{\\bar u_3}=n_{\\nu^c}=n_{\\bar H}=1$ appearing in\nEq.~\\eqref{eq:ANR-K-visible-yz} characterize the dependence of these fields on the $z$-sector K\\\"ahler factor. They are not modular weights with respect to the inflaton modulus. When the dilaton and $z$ are stabilized at $z=0$, $S=\\langle S\\rangle$, the corresponding quadratic matter metrics are $Z_{Q_3}=Z_{\\bar u_3} = Z_{\\nu^c}=Z_{\\bar H} =1$ and hence contain no dependence on the inflaton field $y$.\n\nBy contrast, expanding the $y$-sector logarithm to quadratic order in\n${\\bar h}$ gives\n\\begin{equation}\nK_{\\rm string}\n\\supset\n\\frac{2|\\bar h|^2}{1-|y|^2}\n+\\cdots ,\n\\end{equation}\nso that\n\\begin{equation}\nZ_{\\bar h}\n=\n\\frac{2}{1-|y|^2} \\, .\n\\label{eq:ANR-Higgs-metric-y}\n\\end{equation}\nAlthough $Z_{H_u}$ depends on the inflaton background, this dependence\nbegins at quadratic order in $y$. In particular,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\left.\n\\frac{\\partial Z_{\\bar h}}\n{\\partial\\,{\\rm Re}\\,y}\n\\right|_{y=0}\n=0 \\, .\n\\label{eq:ANR-Higgs-linear-zero}\n\\end{equation}\nThe same conclusion follows from the canonically-normalized Yukawa coupling. The top Yukawa interaction in Eq.~\\eqref{eq:ANR-top-Yukawa} therefore does not generate a linear decay\nof the inflaton about the vacuum.\nWe conclude that, for the specific string-motivated matter assignment in Eqs.~\\eqref{eq:ANR-top-Yukawa} and \\eqref{eq:ANR-K-visible-yz}, the top Yukawa coupling does not provide a linear perturbative decay channel for the $T$ inflaton. This conclusion is independent of whether it is derived in the symmetric $y$ basis.\n\nReheating in this realization must consequently arise from other\ninteractions, such as bilinear visible-sector terms, a modulus-dependent gauge kinetic function, anomaly-induced gauge and gaugino couplings, or additional superpotential operators whose transformed physical coefficients have nonvanishing first derivatives at the vacuum.\n\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\subsection{Matter fields and modulus-dependent superpotential couplings}\n\\label{sec:matfields}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\nTo compare this result with that from the analysis in the previous Section, it is useful\nto transform from the symmetric basis to the $(T,C)$ basis. We use Eq.~(\\ref{eq:Tphi-to-y}), so that \n\\begin{equation}\n {\\bar h}^{(y)} \\; = \\; \\frac{{\\bar h}^{(T)}}{T+\\frac12} \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nThe $y$-sector K\\\"ahler potential then becomes\n\\begin{align}\n-2\\ln\\left(\n1-|y|^2-|{\\bar h}^{(y)}|^2\n\\right)\n={}&\n-2\\ln\\left(\nT+\\bar T-|{\\bar h}^{(T)}|^2\n\\right) +\n2\\ln\\left|T+\\frac12\\right|^2,\n\\end{align}\nup to a constant. The last term is removed by the\nK\\\"ahler transformation\n\\begin{equation}\nJ(T)\n=\n-2\\ln\\left(T+\\frac12\\right),\n\\end{equation}\nunder which\n\\begin{equation}\nW^{(T)}\n=\ne^{-J(T)}W^{(y)}\n=\n\\left(T+\\frac12\\right)^2W^{(y)}.\n\\label{eq:ANR-W-Kahler-transformation}\n\\end{equation}\nThe top Yukawa term therefore transforms as\n\\begin{align}\n\\left(T+\\frac12\\right)^2\nh_tH_u^{(y)}Q_3\\bar u_3\n&=\nh_t\n\\left(T+\\frac12\\right)\nH_u^{(T)}Q_3\\bar u_3 \\, .\n\\label{eq:ANR-top-W-T}\n\\end{align}\nThus, up to constant field normalizations, the top Yukawa operator in the\nhalf-plane basis ($T,C$) is\n\\begin{equation}\nW_{\\rm top}^{(T)}\n=\nh_t\n\\left(T+\\frac12\\right)\nH_u^{(T)}Q_3\\bar u_3 \\, .\n\\label{eq:ANR-top-Yukawa-T}\n\\end{equation}\n\nMore generally, one may consider a visible sector superpotential operator of the form\n\\begin{equation}\nW_{\\rm vis}^{(T)}\n=\n\\left(T+\\frac12\\right)^\\delta\n\\widehat W(\\Phi_I) \\, ,\n\\label{eq:general-delta-W}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\widehat W$ is independent of $T$. If the matter metrics scale\nas\n\\begin{equation}\nZ_I\\propto(T+\\bar T)^{-n_I} \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nthen the canonically-normalized trilinear coupling scales as\n\\begin{equation}\n\\widehat W_{IJK}^{\\rm phys}\n\\propto\ne^{K/2}\n\\frac{\n\\left(T+\\frac12\\right)^\\delta W_{IJK}\n}{\n\\sqrt{Z_IZ_JZ_K}\n} \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nExpanding along the real inflaton direction about\n$T=\\bar T=\\tfrac12$, the coefficient of the linear inflaton\ninteraction is proportional to $n_I+n_J+n_K-3\\alpha+\\delta$. \nThe decay width into the corresponding fermion--fermion--scalar final states is therefore obtained from the result for a $T$-independent superpotential by the replacement\n\\begin{equation}\nn_I+n_J+n_K-3\\alpha\n\\longrightarrow\nn_I+n_J+n_K-3\\alpha+\\delta \\, .\n\\label{eq:delta-shift-rule}\n\\end{equation}\nin Eq.~(\\ref{eq:Gamma-3body-fermion}).\n\nThe same shift appears in the associated four-scalar interaction. For a superpotential derivative carrying the common factor\n$(T+\\tfrac12)^\\delta$, the four-body width becomes\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Gamma\\bigl(\n\\delta T\\rightarrow\n\\Phi_I\\Phi_J\\bar\\Phi^{K}\\bar\\Phi^{M}\n\\bigr)\n=\n\\frac{\n\\left(\nn_I+n_J+n_L-3\\alpha+\\delta\n\\right)^2\n}{\\alpha}\n\\frac{\n\\left|\nW^{IJL}\\bar W_{LKM}\n\\right|^2m^3\n}{\n72(8\\pi)^5M_P^2\n}.\n\\label{eq:Gamma-4body-scalar-delta}\n\\end{equation}\nHere it is understood that the holomorphic and antiholomorphic\nsuperpotential derivatives originate from the same modulus-dependent operator, so that the linear variation of its absolute square produces\nthe single shift $+\\delta$ in\nEq.~\\eqref{eq:Gamma-4body-scalar-delta}.\n\nThus, despite the fact that the effective curvature is given by $\\alpha = 2/3$, the superpotential defined in the basis defined by the K\\\"ahler potential in Eq.~(\\ref{eq:ANR-K-visible-yz}) provides for a decay channel to Higgs and tops. \nThe no-scale cancellation is most easily seen in the $T$ basis where ${\\bar h}$ has K\\\"ahler modular weight 1, and the superpotential also carries modular weight 1\ngiving the cancellation precisely when $\\alpha = 2/3$. In addition, if the gauge kinetic function is minimal in the $y$ basis, there is no decay to gauge bosons through the anomaly, as we discuss in more detail in the next Section. Nevertheless the inflaton does decay through its coupling to the neutrino sector. \n\nInflaton decay in the flipped SU(5) model has been discussed in considerable detail \\cite{EGNNO2,EGNNO3,EGNNO4,EGNNO5}.\nGUT symmetry breaking occurs along a flat direction in which a combination, $\\Phi$, of the singlet components of $H$ and ${\\bar H}$ obtains a vacuum expectation value. \nIt was shown that reheating is completed in the SU(5) symmetric phase if the appropriate component of $|\\lambda_{6}| \\gtrsim\n{\\cal O}(10^{-4})$.\nWhen $\\langle \\Phi\\rangle < m$, the inflaton decays to $F$ and $\\bar{H}$, with a rate given by\n\\beq\\label{eq:decvan}\n\\Gamma(\\delta T\\rightarrow F_i\\bar{H}) \\;\\simeq\\; 10\\times \\frac{|\\lambda_6^{i}|^2}{8\\pi} \\left( 1- \\frac{\\langle \\Phi\\rangle^2}{m^2}\\right) m\\,.\n\\eeq\nThe reheating\ntemperature in this case is given by\n\\begin{equation}\n T_{\\rm RH} \\simeq 1.7 \\times 10^{15} ~\\mathrm{GeV}\n\\times \\lambda_6 \\, ,\n\\label{eq:treh}\n\\end{equation}\nindicating a direct relation between reheating and neutrino masses through \n$T_{\\rm RH}$ and $\\lambda_6$.\nThe importance of this $\\lambda_6$ coupling \\cite{EGNNO4} is amplified, now knowing that Yukawa couplings do not lead to reheating. This conclusion will be further strengthened when we see in the next Section that the coupling to gauge bosons is also absent.\n\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\section{Decays to gauge bosons and gauginos}\n\\label{sec:T-gauge}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\nAs we have seen above, in the $R+R^2$ model, even if the Higgs is conformally coupled to curvature, the inflaton may still decay through its coupling to the trace anomaly \\cite{Gorbunov:2012ns}\n\\begin{align}\n\t\\mathcal{L} \\; = \\; \\frac{\\phi}{\\sqrt{6}\\,M_P}\n{T^\\mu}_\\mu. \\, ,\n \\label{OT}\n\\end{align}\nIn supergravity, this would correspond to a coupling of the K\\\"ahler potential to the trace anomaly \\cite{Endo:2007sz,anom}\n\\begin{align}\n\t\\mathcal{L} = -\\frac{K}{6} {T^\\mu}_\\mu \\, .\n \\label{KT}\n\\end{align}\nWhen the inflaton is identified with the volume modulus $T$, its coupling to the gauge sector receives two contributions in any given K\\\"ahler frame: a direct contribution from explicit inflaton dependence of the holomorphic Wilsonian gauge kinetic function $f_{\\alpha\\beta}$, and a one-loop contribution from the super-Weyl/K\\\"ahler and sigma model anomalies of supergravity. The separation between these contributions is frame-dependent, whereas their sum, and hence the physical inflaton-gauge amplitude, is not. Below we discuss separately the two contributions and demonstrate that the complete coupling is independent of the K\\\"ahler frame.\n\nThe relevant supergravity terms in the gauge sector are\n\\cite{Cremmer:1982en,egno4}\n\\begin{align}\n{\\cal L}_{G}\n&=\n-\\frac{1}{4}\n\\bigl({\\rm Re}\\,f_{\\alpha\\beta}\\bigr)\nF^{\\alpha}_{\\mu\\nu}F^{\\beta\\,\\mu\\nu}\n+\n\\frac{i}{4}\n\\bigl({\\rm Im}\\,f_{\\alpha\\beta}\\bigr)\nF^{\\alpha}_{\\mu\\nu}\\widetilde F^{\\beta\\,\\mu\\nu}\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&\\quad\n+\n\\left[\n\\frac{1}{4}\\,e^{G/2}\n(\\bar f_{\\alpha\\beta})_{,J}\n(G^{-1})^{J}{}_{K}G^{K}\\,\n\\bar\\lambda^{\\alpha}_{L}\\lambda^{\\beta}_{R}\n+\\text{h.c.}\n\\right],\n\\label{eq:LG}\n\\end{align}\nwhere $\\widetilde F^{\\mu\\nu}=(i/2)\\epsilon^{\\mu\\nu\\rho\\sigma}F_{\\rho\\sigma}$. If the gauge kinetic function depends on the volume modulus, $f(T)$, the first two terms determine the couplings of the scalar and pseudoscalar inflaton components to gauge bosons, while the last term gives the corresponding couplings to gauginos. Their contributions to the inflaton decay width are discussed further below. \n\n\\subsection{K\\\"ahler frame invariance of the inflaton-gauge coupling}\nFor a product gauge group $G=\\prod_a G_a$, and neglecting possible kinetic mixing between Abelian factors, the gauge kinetic function is block-diagonal. Within each simple factor $G_a$, gauge invariance restricts it to the form\n\\begin{equation}\nf_{\\alpha\\beta}(\\Phi)\n=\nf_a(\\Phi)\\,\\delta_{\\alpha\\beta} \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\alpha,\\beta$ are adjoint indices of $G_a$, and $\\Phi$ denotes the neutral inflaton chiral multiplet. The gauge kinetic function $f_a(\\Phi)$ is holomorphic. Its real part determines the inverse gauge coupling, while its imaginary part determines the corresponding $F\\widetilde F$ interaction.\n\nWe denote the gauge-charged matter multiplets by $\\Psi^A$, so that\n\\begin{equation}\nK=K(\\Phi,\\bar\\Phi,\\Psi,\\bar\\Psi) \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nOn the inflaton background, the charged matter fields are set to zero, and we define\n\\begin{equation}\n\\widehat K(\\Phi,\\bar\\Phi)\n\\equiv\nK(\\Phi,\\bar\\Phi,\\Psi=0,\\bar\\Psi=0) \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nFor charged multiplets transforming in a representation $r$ of $G_a$, the corresponding matter K\\\"ahler metric is\n\\begin{equation}\nZ^{(r)}_{A\\bar B}(\\Phi,\\bar\\Phi)\n\\equiv\n\\left.\n\\frac{\\partial^2K}\n{\\partial\\Psi^A\\,\\partial\\bar\\Psi^{\\bar B}}\n\\right|_{\\Psi=\\bar\\Psi=0},\n\\; \\;\n\\text{where} \\; A,\\bar B\\ \\text{label multiplets in }r \\, .\n\\label{eq:Zr-definition}\n\\end{equation}\nThus $Z^{(r)}$ is obtained by differentiating with respect to the charged matter fields, but after evaluation at the matter vacuum it depends on the inflaton background $(\\Phi,\\bar\\Phi)$. We take the determinant over multiplet, or flavor, space. The trace over gauge indices is contained in the Dynkin coefficient $T_a(r)$. In particular, if\n$Z^{(r)}_{A\\bar B}=Z_r\\delta_{A\\bar B}$ for $N_r$ copies of $r$, then\n\\begin{equation}\n\\ln\\det Z^{(r)}=N_r\\ln Z_r \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nInvariance of the Lagrangian under the K\\\"ahler transformation will require the inclusion of one-loop contributions to the gauge kinetic function. \nFollowing~\\cite{Kaplunovsky:1994fg}, \nwe can define the \ncoefficient of $-\\frac14 F^a_{\\mu\\nu} F^{a~\\mu\\nu}$ as ${\\cal F}_a$ including the one-loop contributions needed for K\\\"ahler transformations. \nThe terms relevant for the field dependence and K\\\"ahler frame transformation of the one-loop physical inverse gauge coupling may be organized as\n\\begin{equation}\n{\\cal F}_a(\\Phi,\\bar\\Phi)\n=\n{\\rm Re}\\,f_a(\\Phi)\n+\n\\frac{c_a}{16\\pi^2}\n\\widehat K(\\Phi,\\bar\\Phi)\n-\n\\sum_r\n\\frac{T_a(r)}{8\\pi^2}\n\\ln\\det Z^{(r)}(\\Phi,\\bar\\Phi)\n+\\cdots \\, ,\n\\label{eq:Fa-field-dependent}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere\n\\begin{equation}\nc_a=T_R-T_a(G) \\, ,\n\\qquad\nT_R\\equiv\\sum_r N_rT_a(r) \\, .\n\\label{catr}\n\\end{equation}\nHere $T_a(G)$ is the Dynkin index of the adjoint representation and\n$T_a(r)$ is that of the matter representation $r$.\n\nEquation~\\eqref{eq:Fa-field-dependent} displays only the terms needed for the discussion of the K\\\"ahler frame transformation. The ellipsis includes the ordinary momentum-dependent running and gauge field self-renormalization. These terms are separately invariant under the transformations considered below at the order relevant to the proof, although\nthey may carry additional model-dependent inflaton dependence. Unlike the holomorphic function $f_a(\\Phi)$, the physical quantity ${\\cal F}_a(\\Phi,\\bar\\Phi)$ is real and generally nonholomorphic. Its variation along the physical inflaton direction determines the complete CP-even coupling to $F^a_{\\mu\\nu}F^{a\\,\\mu\\nu}$.\n\nLet us consider a combined transformation\n\\begin{align}\nK\n&\\longrightarrow\nK+J+\\bar J \\, ,\n\\nonumber\\\\\n\\Psi^{(r)}\n&\\longrightarrow\n\\Psi^{\\prime(r)}\n=\nC_r(\\Phi)\\,\\Psi^{(r)} \\, ,\n\\label{eq:Kahler-matter-transformation}\n\\end{align}\nwhere $J$ and $C_r$ are holomorphic. The matter metric transforms as\n\\begin{equation}\nZ^{\\prime(r)}\n=\n\\bigl(C_r^{\\dagger}\\bigr)^{-1}\nZ^{(r)}\nC_r^{-1} \\, ,\n\\label{eq:Z-transformation}\n\\end{equation}\nand hence\n\\begin{equation}\n\\ln\\det Z^{\\prime(r)}\n=\n\\ln\\det Z^{(r)}\n-\n\\ln\\det C_r\n-\n\\ln\\det C_r^{\\dagger} \\, .\n\\label{eq:logdetZ-transformation}\n\\end{equation}\nIt was shown in~\\cite{Kaplunovsky:1994fg} that the holomorphic gauge kinetic function transforms anomalously:\n\\begin{equation}\nf_a^{\\,\\prime}\n=\nf_a\n-\n\\frac{c_a}{8\\pi^2}\\,\nJ\n-\n\\sum_r\n\\frac{T_a(r)}{4\\pi^2}\\,\n\\ln\\det C_r \\, .\n\\label{eq:KL-fW}\n\\end{equation}\nTaking the real part of $f_a^{\\,\\prime}$,\nand using Eqs.~\\eqref{eq:Kahler-matter-transformation} and \\eqref{eq:logdetZ-transformation}, we see that the three field-dependent terms in Eq.~\\eqref{eq:Fa-field-dependent} transform as\n\\begin{align}\n{\\rm Re}\\,f_a\n&\\longrightarrow\n{\\rm Re}\\,f_a\n-\n\\frac{c_a}{16\\pi^2}(J+\\bar J)\n-\n\\sum_r\n\\frac{T_a(r)}{8\\pi^2}\n\\ln\\bigl|\\det C_r\\bigr|^2 \\, ,\n\\nonumber\\\\[3pt]\n\\frac{c_a}{16\\pi^2}\\widehat K\n&\\longrightarrow\n\\frac{c_a}{16\\pi^2}\\widehat K\n+\n\\frac{c_a}{16\\pi^2}(J+\\bar J) \\, ,\n\\nonumber\\\\[3pt]\n-\\sum_r\n\\frac{T_a(r)}{8\\pi^2}\n\\ln\\det Z^{(r)}\n&\\longrightarrow\n-\\sum_r\n\\frac{T_a(r)}{8\\pi^2}\n\\ln\\det Z^{(r)}\n+\n\\sum_r\n\\frac{T_a(r)}{8\\pi^2}\n\\ln\\bigl|\\det C_r\\bigr|^2 \\, .\n\\end{align}\nThe terms proportional to $J+\\bar J$ cancel between the gauge kinetic function and\nK\\\"ahler contributions, while the terms involving $C_r$ cancel between the gauge kinetic function and matter wave-function contributions. Consequently,\n\\begin{equation}\n{\\cal F}_a'(\\Phi,\\bar\\Phi)\n=\n{\\cal F}_a(\\Phi,\\bar\\Phi) \\, .\n\\label{eq:Fa-invariant}\n\\end{equation}\nThe displayed field-dependent part of the physical inverse gauge coupling is therefore invariant under the combined K\\\"ahler transformation and holomorphic matter field redefinition. Its decomposition in Eq.~(\\ref{eq:Fa-field-dependent}) into the tree-level gauge kinetic function, the K\\\"ahler anomaly, and matter wave-function contributions is frame-dependent, but their sum is not.\n\nWe now consider the contributions to inflaton decays of the various terms in $\\cal{F}$. \n\n\\subsection{Direct contribution from $f_{\\alpha\\beta}(T)$}\n\\label{sec:T-gauge-direct}\nFor a diagonal gauge kinetic function with explicit modulus dependence,\n\\begin{equation}\nf_{\\alpha\\beta}(T)\n=\nf(T)\\,\\delta_{\\alpha\\beta},\n\\qquad\nf(T)\n=\n\\langle f\\rangle\n+\n\\left.\n\\frac{\\partial f}{\\partial T}\n\\right|_0\n\\bigl(T-\\langle T\\rangle\\bigr)\n+\\cdots \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nthe strength of the direct inflaton-gauge coupling is characterized by\n\\cite{Endo:2006xg,egno4}\n\\begin{equation}\nd_{g,T}\n\\equiv\n\\langle{\\rm Re}\\,f\\rangle^{-1}\n\\left|\n\\left.\n\\frac{\\partial f}{\\partial T}\n\\right|_0\n\\right| \\, ,\n\\label{eq:dgT-def}\n\\end{equation}\nwhich vanishes when $f(T)$ is independent of $T$ in the K\\\"ahler frame under consideration.\n\nAlong the real inflaton trajectory, we use the same canonically-normalized\nmodulus fluctuation $\\delta T$ defined in Eq.~(\\ref{eq:T-canonical-decay})\nwith the vacuum normalization $\\langle T+\\bar T\\rangle=1$.\nAfter canonical normalization of the gauge fields, the partial width into\ngauge bosons belonging to the gauge-group factor $G_a$ is\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Gamma(\\delta T\\rightarrow A_aA_a)\n=\n\\frac{d_{g,T}^{\\,2}}{32\\pi\\alpha}\n\\left(\\frac{N_a}{12}\\right)\n\\frac{m^3}{M_P^2} \\, ,\n\\label{eq:Gamma-direct}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $N_a=\\dim G_a$ is the number of gauge bosons in the final-state\nsector and $m$ is the inflaton mass. For $\\alpha=1$, this reduces to\nEq.~(5.68) of Ref.~\\cite{egno4}.\n\nThe direct decay to gauginos arising from the last term in $\\mathcal{L}_G$ is proportional to $G^K$ and is therefore suppressed by $\\mathcal{O}(m_{3/2}/m)$ at the amplitude level relative to the gauge boson channel, and by $\\mathcal{O}[(m_{3/2}/m)^2]$ at the level of the\npartial width \\cite{Kallosh:2011qk}. This suppression is generic for the direct coupling in supergravity, but does not apply to the anomaly-induced gaugino channel discussed below.\n\n\\subsection{Anomaly-induced contribution}\n\\label{sec:T-gauge-anomaly}\nWe now extract the anomaly-induced decay directly from the field-dependent physical inverse gauge coupling introduced above. We first assume that the gauge kinetic function is independent of the inflaton:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\frac{\\partial f_a}{\\partial T}=0 \\, .\n\\label{eq:fT-constant-anom}\n\\end{equation}\nThe inflaton dependence of ${\\cal F}_a$ then arises entirely from the K\\\"ahler and matter wave-function terms,\n\\begin{equation}\n{\\cal F}_a^{\\rm anom}\n=\n\\frac{c_a}{16\\pi^2}\n\\widehat K\n-\n\\sum_r\n\\frac{T_a(r)}{8\\pi^2}\n\\ln\\det Z^{(r)} \\, ,\n\\qquad\nc_a=T_R-T_a(G) \\, .\n\\label{eq:Fa-anom}\n\\end{equation}\nConsidering the no-scale K\\\"ahler potential~(\\ref{eq:K-alpha-decays}), we set all the visible sector fields to zero after differentiation. The matter metrics take the form\n\\begin{equation}\nZ_r\n=\n\\kappa_r\\,(T+\\bar{T})^{-n_r} \\, ,\n\\label{eq:Zr-noscale}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere\n\\begin{equation}\nn_r=\n\\begin{cases}\n1, & \\text{for untwisted matter},\\\\\nn_a, & \\text{for twisted matter},\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nand $\\kappa_r$ is independent of $T$. In particular,\n$\\kappa_r=\\alpha$ for untwisted fields, whereas\n$\\kappa_r=1$ for the twisted fields in Eq.~\\eqref{eq:K-alpha-decays}. If there are\n$N_r$ copies of the representation $r$, then\n\\begin{equation}\n\\ln\\det Z^{(r)}\n=\nN_r\\ln\\kappa_r\n-\nN_rn_r\\ln (T + \\bar{T}) \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nThe constant factor $\\kappa_r$ therefore drops out of the inflaton\nderivative.\nUsing the definition for $T_R$ in Eq.~(\\ref{catr}),\nwe obtain\n\\begin{align}\n\\frac{\\partial{\\cal F}_a^{\\rm anom}}{\\partial T}\n&=\n-\\frac{3\\alpha c_a}{16\\pi^2(T+ \\bar{T})}\n+\n\\frac{1}{T+\\bar{T}}\\sum_r\n\\frac{N_rn_rT_a(r)}{8\\pi^2}\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&=\n\\frac{1}{16\\pi^2(T+ \\bar{T})}\n\\left[\n3\\alpha\\bigl(T_a(G)-T_R\\bigr)\n+\n2\\sum_rN_rn_rT_a(r)\n\\right] \\equiv \\frac{B_a^{(\\alpha)}}{16\\pi^2(T+\\bar T)} \\, .\n\\label{eq:dFa-anom-dT}\n\\end{align}\nAlong the real trajectory,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\left.\n\\frac{\\partial T}{\\partial\\delta T}\n\\right|_0\n=\n\\left.\n\\frac{\\partial\\bar T}{\\partial\\delta T}\n\\right|_0\n=\n\\frac{\\langle T+\\bar T\\rangle}\n{\\sqrt{6\\alpha}} \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nSince the complete physical inverse gauge coupling ${\\cal F}_a(T,\\bar T)$ is generally nonholomorphic, the relevant variation is taken along the real modulus direction. We therefore generalize the tree-level coefficient $d_{g,T}$ to\n\\begin{equation}\nd_{a,T}^{\\rm eff}\n\\equiv\n\\left\\langle{\\cal F}_a\\right\\rangle^{-1}\n\\left|\n\\left.\n\\left(\n\\frac{\\partial{\\cal F}_a}{\\partial T}\n+\n\\frac{\\partial{\\cal F}_a}{\\partial\\bar T}\n\\right)\n\\right|_0\n\\right| \\, .\n\\label{eq:d-eff-definition}\n\\end{equation}\nFor the purely holomorphic tree-level contribution, ${\\cal F}_a={\\rm Re}\\,f_a$, this reduces along a CP-conserving real trajectory to\n\\begin{equation}\nd_{a,T}^{\\rm eff}\n=\n\\left\\langle{\\rm Re}\\,f_a\\right\\rangle^{-1}\n\\left|\n\\left.\n\\frac{\\partial f_a}{\\partial T}\n\\right|_0\n\\right|\n=\nd_{g,T} \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nas in Eq.~(\\ref{eq:dgT-def}).\nAfter canonical normalization of the gauge fields, the interaction is\ntherefore \n\\begin{equation}\n{\\cal L}_{\\delta TFF}\n=\n-\\frac{1}{4}\n\\frac{d_{a,T}^{\\rm eff}}{\\sqrt{6\\alpha}}\n\\delta T\\,\nF^a_{\\mu\\nu}F^{a\\,\\mu\\nu} \\, ,\n\\label{eq:L-eff-from-F}\n\\end{equation}\nup to the phase of the coupling. The corresponding partial width is the same\nas for the direct contribution:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Gamma(\\delta T\\to A_aA_a)\n=\n\\frac{|d_{a,T}^{\\rm eff}|^2}{32\\pi\\alpha}\n\\left(\\frac{N_a}{12}\\right)\n\\frac{m^3}{M_P^2} \\, .\n\\label{eq:Gamma-gauge-master}\n\\end{equation}\nTo one-loop accuracy, $\\left\\langle{\\cal F}_a\\right\\rangle^{-1} = g_a^2$, so that using Eq.~(\\ref{eq:d-eff-definition})\n\\begin{equation}\nd_{a,T}^{\\rm anom}\n=\n\\frac{g_a^2}{8\\pi^2}\n\\left|B_a^{(\\alpha)}\\right| \\; = \\; \\frac{\\alpha_a}{2\\pi} \\left|B_a^{(\\alpha)}\\right| \\, ,\n\\label{eq:d-anom-final}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\alpha_a = g_a^2/4\\pi$ is the generalized fine structure constant. \nSubstitution into Eq.~\\eqref{eq:Gamma-gauge-master} gives\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Gamma(\\delta T\\to A_aA_a)\\big|_{\\rm anom}\n=\n\\frac{N_a g_a^4}{24576\\pi^5\\alpha}\n\\left|B_a^{(\\alpha)}\\right|^2\n\\frac{m^3}{M_P^2} \\, .\n\\label{eq:Gamma-anom}\n\\end{equation}\nThe relation to the conventional trace anomaly is especially transparent for\nthe standard no-scale case, $\\alpha=1$. Writing the beta function as\n\\begin{equation}\nb_a\n\\equiv\n3T_a(G)-T_R \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nthe anomaly coefficient becomes\n\\begin{align}\nB_a^{(1)}\n&=\n3\\bigl[T_a(G)-T_R\\bigr]\n+\n2\\sum_rN_rn_rT_a(r)=\nb_a\n+\n2\\sum_rN_r\\bigl(n_r-1\\bigr)T_a(r) \\, .\n\\label{eq:B-alpha1-trace}\n\\end{align}\nThe first term is the usual one-loop supersymmetric beta function coefficient. It depends only on the charged particle content and gauge representations, and is independent of the modular weights. The second term is an additional contribution that measures how the modulus dependence of the charged-matter metrics differs from that of\nuntwisted no-scale matter. When all charged matter multiplets are untwisted, $n_r=1$, and in that case, $B_a^{(1)}=b_a$ and Eq.~(\\ref{eq:Gamma-anom}) reduces to Eq.~(\\ref{anomD}).\nThe reheating temperature in this case is\n\\begin{equation}\n\\trh\n=\n\\left(\n\\frac{72}{5\\pi^2g_{\\rm RH}}\n\\right)^{1/4}\n\\left( \\sum_a \\frac{N_a b_a^2 \\alpha_a^2}{1536 \\pi^{3}}\\right)^{1/2} \\frac{m^{3/2}}{M_P^{1/2}} \\simeq 4 \\times 10^7~{\\rm GeV} \\, ,\n\\label{eq:Treh-Gamma2}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere the numerical value is evaluated for MSSM inputs with $m = 3 \\times 10^{13}$~GeV. For the MSSM, we use $b_i^{\\rm MSSM} = \\left(\\frac{33}{5}, 1, -3 \\right)$.\n\n\n\\subsection{Anomaly-induced coupling in the symmetric basis}\n\\label{sec:y-gauge-anomaly}\nWe now rewrite the anomaly-induced coupling in the symmetric SU(2,1)/SU(2)$\\times$U(1) basis as in Eqs.~(\\ref{eq:Tphi-to-y}) and (\\ref{eq:y-to-Tphi}). In this subsection, we specialize to the no-scale case $\\alpha=1$. It is convenient to define\n\\begin{equation}\nD(y)\n\\equiv\n1+\\frac{y}{\\sqrt{3}} \\, ,\n\\label{eq:D-y2}\n\\end{equation}\nand the volume modulus and the untwisted matter field are then related to the symmetric coordinates by\n\\begin{equation}\nT+\\bar T\n=\n\\frac{1-|y|^2/3}{|D(y)|^2} \\, ,\n\\qquad\n\\phi_i^{(T)}\n=\nD^{-1}\\phi_i^{(y)} \\, ,\n\\qquad\n\\phi_i^{(y)}\\equiv y_i \\, .\n\\label{eq:Y-y2}\n\\end{equation}\nMore generally, a charged matter multiplet of effective modular weight $n_r$ is rescaled according to\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Psi_r^{(y)}\n=\nD^{\\,n_r}\\Psi_r^{(T)} \\, ,\n\\label{eq:Psi-y-transform}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $n_r=1$ for untwisted matter and $n_r=n_b$ for a twisted\nmultiplet of modular weight $n_b$. The transformation of the K\\\"ahler\npotential may be written as\n\\begin{equation}\nK^{(y)}\n=\nK^{(T)}+J+\\bar J \\, ,\n\\qquad\nJ(y)\n=\n-3\\ln D(y) \\, .\n\\label{eq:Kahler-y-transform}\n\\end{equation}\nCorrespondingly, the superpotential transforms as\n\\begin{equation}\nW^{(y)}(y,y_i)\n=\nD(y)^{3}\\,\nW^{(T)}\\bigl(T(y),\\phi_i(y,y_i)\\bigr) \\, .\n\\label{eq:W-y-transform}\n\\end{equation}\nAlong the modulus-inflaton trajectory, $y_0=0$, and we define\n\\begin{equation}\nS(y,\\bar y)\n\\equiv\n1-\\frac{|y|^2}{3} \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nThe matter metrics in the symmetric basis take the form\n\\begin{equation}\nZ_r^{(y)}\n=\n\\kappa_r\\,S^{-n_r} \\, ,\n\\label{eq:Z-y-symmetric}\n\\end{equation}\nwith $\\kappa_r=\\alpha$ for untwisted matter and $\\kappa_r=1$ for the\ntwisted matter metrics considered above. For $N_r$ copies of representation\n$r$,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\ln\\det Z_r^{(y)}\n=\nN_r\\ln\\kappa_r\n-\nN_rn_r\\ln S \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nThe K\\\"ahler- and matter wave-function dependent part of the physical inverse gauge coupling is therefore\n\\begin{equation}\n{\\cal F}_{a,y}^{\\rm anom}\n=\n\\frac{c_a}{16\\pi^2}\\widehat K^{(y)}\n-\n\\sum_r\n\\frac{T_a(r)}{8\\pi^2}\n\\ln\\det Z_r^{(y)}\n=\n\\frac{B_a}{16\\pi^2}\\ln S\n+\\text{const.} \\, ,\n\\label{eq:F-anom-y}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere\n$B_a$ is given by Eq.~(\\ref{eq:dFa-anom-dT}) for $\\alpha = 1$.\nSince $S=1-|y|^2/3$, both the K\\\"ahler potential and the matter metrics\nare even in $y$. Consequently,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\left.\n\\frac{\\partial{\\cal F}_{a,y}^{\\rm anom}}{\\partial y}\n\\right|_{y=y_i=0}\n=\n0 \\, .\n\\label{eq:F-anom-y-zero}\n\\end{equation}\nThus the K\\\"ahler and matter wave-function terms do not generate a linear\ninflaton coupling at the symmetric point.\n\nThe physical coupling nevertheless does not vanish. The combined K\\\"ahler\ntransformation and holomorphic matter rescaling are anomalous and induce a\nfield-dependent Wilsonian gauge kinetic function. Using the equations from the previous Section,\n\\begin{equation}\nJ=-3\\ln D \\, ,\n\\qquad\nC_r=D^{n_r} \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\ngives\n\\begin{equation}\nf_a^{(y)}(y)\n=\nf_a^{(T)}\\bigl(T(y)\\bigr)\n-\n\\frac{B_a^{(\\alpha)}}{8\\pi^2}\n\\ln D(y) \\, .\n\\label{eq:f-y-transformed}\n\\end{equation}\nIn particular, even when\n\\begin{equation}\n\\frac{\\partial f_a^{(T)}}{\\partial T}=0\n\\end{equation}\nthe symmetric basis function $f_a^{(y)}$ is not constant.\n\nThe equality of the physical inverse gauge couplings can be seen directly.\nUsing\n\\begin{equation}\nT+\\bar T\n=\n\\frac{S}{|D|^2} \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nthe symmetric basis result may be written as\n\\begin{align}\n{\\cal F}_{a,T}\n&=\n{\\rm Re}\\,f_a^{(T)}\n+\n\\frac{B_a^{(\\alpha)}}{16\\pi^2}\n\\ln(T+\\bar T)\n+\\text{const.}\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&=\n{\\rm Re}\\,f_a^{(T)}\n+\n\\frac{B_a^{(\\alpha)}}{16\\pi^2}\\ln S\n-\n\\frac{B_a^{(\\alpha)}}{16\\pi^2}\\ln|D|^2\n+\\text{const.}\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&=\n{\\rm Re}\\,f_a^{(y)}\n+\n\\frac{B_a^{(\\alpha)}}{16\\pi^2}\\ln S\n+\\text{const.}\n\\nonumber\\\\\n&=\n{\\cal F}_{a,y} \\, .\n\\label{eq:F-basis-equality}\n\\end{align}\nThus the complete physical inverse gauge coupling is identical in the two\nbases. In the half-plane basis the linear interaction is carried by the\nK\\\"ahler and matter wave-function terms, whereas in the symmetric basis it is\ncarried entirely by the transformed Wilsonian gauge kinetic function.\n\nAt the symmetric vacuum,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\left.\n\\frac{\\partial f_a^{(y)}}{\\partial y}\n\\right|_0\n=\n-\\frac{B_a^{(\\alpha)}}{8\\pi^2\\sqrt{3}} \\, .\n\\label{eq:dfdy2}\n\\end{equation}\nThe canonically-normalized real modulus is related to $y$ near the\nvacuum by\n\\begin{equation}\n\\delta T\n=\n-\\sqrt{2}\\,{\\rm Re}\\,y+\\cdots \\, ,\n\\label{eq:y2-canonical}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere the sign follows from Eq.~\\eqref{eq:y-to-Tphi}. Hence\n\\begin{equation}\n\\left.\n\\frac{\\partial{\\cal F}_{a,y}}\n{\\partial\\delta T}\n\\right|_0\n=\n\\frac{B_a^{(\\alpha)}}\n{8\\pi^2\\sqrt{6}} \\, ,\n\\label{eq:dFydeltaT}\n\\end{equation}\nwhich is identical to the result obtained previously.\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\section{$R^3$ contributions to inflaton decay}\n\\label{sec:R3}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\nThe supergravity extension of a general $F(R)$ gravity was derived recently in \\cite{Antoniadis:2026uzn}. It can be described as ordinary ${\\cal N}=1$ supergravity coupled to three chiral superfields. Besides the scalaron of $F(R)$ gravity, $T$, and the goldstino (or `stabilizer') field $C$, there is a third superfield $X$ that decouples in the case of Starobinsky supergravity $R+\\alpha_{S} R^2$,~\\footnote{Here, $\\alpha_S$ should not be confused with the parameter $\\alpha$ appearing in the K\\\"ahler potential in Eq.~\\eqref{eq:K-alpha-decays}.} and is an auxiliary field in the expansion around the vacuum $C=0$. To understand the physical meaning of the 3 superfields, $T$ is a Lagrange multiplier imposing the identification of $C$ with the chiral curvature superfield ${\\cal R}$ while $X$ is the chiral projection of $\\bar{\\cal R}$. In the bosonic case, they are all related to one scalar field (the scalaron) linearizing the action, while in the supersymmetric case there are 2 independent fields because higher powers of $R$ emerge from non-chiral actions depending on ${\\cal R}$ and $\\bar{\\cal R}$, unlike Einstein gravity.\nIt was shown that the point $C=0$ is stable for any $T$, and thus along the whole inflaton trajectory of $\\text{Re}~T$, in the presence of the string dilaton, because $C$ acquires a large positive mass. Moreover, the absence of ghosts and tachyons in $F(R)$ supergravity implies two conditions on the first and third derivatives of $F(R)$ that generalize the conditions of the bosonic case and guarantee the stability of the scalar potential at ${\\text{Im}}~T=C=0$, which is identical to that of $F(R)$ gravity. It is important to note that the corresponding K\\\"ahler potential is of no-scale type for any $F(R)$, generalizing the case of Starobinsky supergravity.\n\nWe are interested here in extending the $F(R)$ supergravity in the presence of matter coupled to the metric of the Jordan frame, i.e., of $F(R)$ before expressing it as a 2-derivative action using Lagrange multipliers. For pedagogical reasons, we first derive the action in the case of $R+\\alpha_S R^2$ supergravity, which can subsequently be extended using the same steps in a straightforward way to the more general case. We start in the absence of $R^2$ with an effective ${\\cal N}=1$ supergravity of matter fields $\\phi$ described by a K\\\"ahler potential $\\hat{K}(\\phi,\\bar\\phi)$ and a superpotential $\\hat{W}(\\phi)$ depending only on matter fields (gauge fields and interactions are not modified and are omitted for simplicity). Upon adding the supersymmetric $\\alpha_S R^2$ term, the Lagrangian reads:\n\\begin{equation}\n{\\cal L}= -3\\left[\\left(e^{-\\hat{K}/3}-6\\alpha_S\\frac{\\cal R}{S_0}\\frac{\\bar{\\cal R}}{\\bar{S}_0}\\right)S_0\\bar{S}_0\\right]_\\text{D} \n+ \\left(\\left[\\hat{W}S_0^3\\right]_\\text{F}+ \\text{h.c.}\\right)\\,,\n\\label{eq:LR2}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $S_0$ is the chiral compensator and we use the notations and conventions of \\cite{Antoniadis:2026uzn}. In particular, the subscripts D and F denote integrals over the full superspace (D-term) and chiral superspace (F-term), respectively, and the parameter $\\alpha_S=1/(6m^2)$ with $m$ the inflaton mass, as denoted before. For $\\alpha_S=0$, $\\cal L$ reduces trivially to the initial supergravity of matter fields.\n\nIntroducing a Lagrange multiplier $T$ and identifying ${\\cal R}/{S_0}=C/\\sqrt{18\\alpha_S}$, the Lagrangian \\eqref{eq:LR2} can be rewritten as\n\\begin{align}\n{\\cal L}&= -3\\left[\\left(e^{-\\hat{K}/3}-\\frac{C{\\bar{C}}}{3}\\right)S_0\\bar{S}_0\\right]_\\text{D} \n+ \\left(\\left[\\left\\{3T\\left(\\frac{C}{\\sqrt{18\\alpha_S}}-\\frac{\\cal R}{S_0}\\right)+\\hat{W}\\right\\}S_0^3\\right]_\\text{F}\n+ \\text{h.c.}\\right)\\nonumber\\\\\n&=-3\\left[\\left(e^{-\\hat{K}/3}+T+\\bar{T}-\\frac{C{\\bar{C}}}{3}\\right)S_0\\bar{S}_0\\right]_\\text{D} \n+ \\left(\\left[\\left\\{\\sqrt{3}mTC+\\hat{W}\\right\\}S_0^3\\right]_\\text{F}+ \\text{h.c.}\\right)\\,,\n\\label{eq:LR2TC}\n\\end{align}\nwhere in the second line we used a supersymmetric identity. It follows that the initial supergravity defined by $\\hat{K}$ and $\\hat{W}$ is modified in the presence of $R^2$ to $K$ and $W$ that depend now also on $T$ and $C$:\n\\begin{align}\nK=-3\\ln\\left(e^{-\\hat{K}(\\phi)/3}-1+T+\\bar{T}-\\frac{C{\\bar{C}}}{3} \\right)\\,;\\quad W=\\sqrt{3}mC\\left(T-\\frac12\\right)+\\hat{W}(\\phi)\\,,\n\\label{eq:LR2KW}\n\\end{align}\nwhere $T$ has been redefined by $T\\to T-1/2$.\nFor matter with a no-scale K\\\"ahler potential $\\hat{K}=-3\\ln(1-\\sum_\\alpha |\\phi_\\alpha|^2/3)$, one obtains the expression given in Eq.~\\eqref{nsK} for $K$. Indeed, one obtains the same form for any $\\hat{K}$ when expanding about canonical kinetic terms.\n\nThe generalization to $F(R)$ is now straightforward, following the same steps as in \\cite{Antoniadis:2026uzn}. As a concrete example, we next consider the addition of an $R^3$ term.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\\subsection{$R^3$ corrections}\n\nWe start from the supergravity embedding of $R + \\alpha_S R^2 + \\beta R^3$ in the formulation of~\\cite{Antoniadis:2026uzn}, augmented by a matter superfield\n$\\phi_m$ coupled inside the no-scale logarithm, as was described above:\n\\begin{align}\nK\n&=\n-3\\ln\\!\\left[\nT+\\bar T\n-\\frac{\\phi_m\\bar\\phi_m}{3}\n-\\frac{C\\bar C}{3}\n\\left(\n1+\\frac{\\beta}{m^2}(X+\\bar X)\n\\right)\n\\right],\n\\label{eq:K-full}\n\\\\\nW\n&=\n\\sqrt{3}mC\n\\left[\nT-\\frac12\n+\\frac{\\beta}{8m^4}X^2\n\\right] \\, ,\n\\label{eq:W-full}\n\\end{align}\nwhere $X$ is the auxiliary chiral superfield encoding the $R^3$ deformation (non-propagating around $C=0$), and $\\beta$ is the dimensionless coupling normalized as in~\\cite{Gialamas:2025ofz, Antoniadis:2026uzn}.\n\nIt is important that the $X$-dependent factor in\nEq.~\\eqref{eq:K-full} multiplies only the sgoldstino bilinear\n$C\\bar C/3$. In particular, the additional matter terms\n$\\phi_m\\bar\\phi_m/3$ are not dressed by $X$ or $\\beta$.\nRestricting to the real inflationary trajectory, $T_I=X_I=C=0$, the scalar potential before eliminating $X_R$ is~\\footnote{The notation $T_R$ in this Section denotes the real component of the scalar field $T$ and should not be confused with the total matter Dynkin index $T_R\\equiv\\sum_r N_rT_a(r)$ introduced earlier.}\n\\begin{equation}\nV(T_R,X_R)\n \\; = \\; \\frac{3 X_R}{16m^4 (2T_R-\\frac13|\\phi_m|^2)^2} \\left[4m^4(2T_R - 1) -m^2 X_R - \\beta X_R^2 \\right]\\, .\n\\label{eq:V-TR-XR}\n\\end{equation}\nSince $X_R$ has no kinetic term on this trajectory, its equation of motion is the algebraic stationarity condition\n$\\partial V/\\partial X_R=0$. Besides the branch for which $D_CW=0$, the branch continuously connected to the $R+R^2$ theory satisfies\n\\begin{equation}\n3\\beta X_R^2\n+2m^2X_R\n-8m^4\\left(T_R-\\frac12\\right)\n=0 \\, ,\n\\label{eq:XR-equation}\n\\end{equation}\nand is independent of $\\phi_m$.\nIts solution is\n\\begin{equation}\nX_R^-(T_R)\n=\n-\\frac{m^2}{3\\beta}\n\\left[\n1-\n\\sqrt{\n1+24\\beta\\left(T_R-\\frac12\\right)\n}\n\\right] \\, ,\n\\label{eq:XR-solution}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere the branch has been chosen such that the limit\n$\\beta\\rightarrow0$ is regular. For small $|\\beta|$,\n\\begin{equation}\nX_R^-(T_R)\n=\n4m^2\\left(T_R-\\frac12\\right)\n-24\\beta m^2\n\\left(T_R-\\frac12\\right)^2\n+\\mathcal O(\\beta^2) \\, .\n\\label{eq:X-expansion}\n\\end{equation}\nThe function multiplying $C\\bar C/3$ in the K\\\"ahler potential is\n\\begin{equation}\nF_C(T,\\bar T)\n\\equiv\n1+\\frac{\\beta}{m^2}(X+\\bar X) \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nAlong the real trajectory,\n$X+\\bar X=2X_R^-(T_R)$ and\n$T_R-\\tfrac12=\\tfrac12(T+\\bar T-1)$, so that\n\\begin{align}\nF_C(T,\\bar T)\n={}&\n1+4\\beta(T+\\bar T-1)-12\\beta^2(T+\\bar T-1)^2\n+\\mathcal O(\\beta^3) \\, .\n\\label{eq:FC-expansion}\n\\end{align}\nConsequently, to quadratic order in $C$ and $\\phi_m$, the effective\nK\\\"ahler potential along the real trajectory takes the form\n\\begin{align}\nK_{\\rm eff}\n=\n-3\\ln\\!\\Big[\n&T+\\bar T-\\frac{\\phi_m\\bar\\phi_m}{3}-\\frac{C\\bar C}{3}\n\\big\\{\n1+4\\beta(T+\\bar T-1)\n+\\mathcal O(\\beta^2)\n\\big\\}\n\\Big] \\, .\n\\label{eq:K-eff}\n\\end{align}\nAt $\\beta=0$, this reduces to the standard Cecotti/no-scale form,\n\\begin{equation}\nK\n=\n-3\\ln\\left(\nT+\\bar T-\\frac{C\\bar C}{3}-\\frac{\\phi_m\\bar\\phi_m}{3}\n\\right) \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nTo leading order in $\\beta$, the $R^3$-deformed no-scale supergravity is\ncaptured by a modification of the $\\alpha=1$ Cecotti model (see Eq.~(\\ref{CSM})) in which the sgoldstino bilinear $C \\bar{C}/3$ receives a K{\\\" a}hler-potential dressing factor\n$\\big[1 + 4\\beta\\,(T+\\bar T - 1)\\big]$, and the superpotential acquires the\nholomorphic correction $2\\beta\\,(T - \\tfrac{1}{2})^2$. Higher orders in\n$\\beta$ follow systematically from~\\eqref{eq:X-expansion}.\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\section{Summary and conclusions}\n\\label{sec:summ}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\nWe have studied perturbative reheating in no-scale supergravity models in which the inflaton is identified with the real component of the volume modulus $T$. In the minimal no-scale realization with scalar manifold curvature $\\mathcal R=2/3$, the leading inflaton couplings to conformally-embedded visible matter exhibit a well-known no-scale cancellation. In particular, for a $T$-independent trilinear superpotential coupling among three untwisted fields, the coefficient of the linear inflaton interaction vanishes.\n\nWe generalized the matter decay amplitudes to the K\\\"ahler potential with an $\\alpha$ dependence, given by Eq.~(\\ref{eq:K-alpha-decays}), whose scalar manifold curvature is $\\mathcal R=2/(3\\alpha)$. After canonical normalization, an untwisted field has effective $T$-modular weight one. For a trilinear visible operator with no explicit modulus dependence, the corresponding three-body decay amplitude is therefore controlled by a factor $n_I+n_J+n_K-3\\alpha$ (see Eq.~(\\ref{eq:Gamma-3body-fermion})). The conformal cancellation is recovered when the relevant sum of modular weights equals $3\\alpha$. The dominant tree-level decay rate then scales as $m^3/M_P^2$, up to visible couplings and modular weights.\n\nThe coupling of the modulus to gauge bosons receives both a direct\ncontribution from the holomorphic gauge kinetic function and a\none-loop contribution from the super-Weyl/K\\\"ahler and sigma model\nanomalies. Although the separation of these terms depends on the\nK\\\"ahler frame and on holomorphic matter-field redefinitions, their sum is invariant. For a modulus-independent tree-level gauge kinetic function, the anomaly-induced channel therefore provides an\nirreducible reheating mechanism with a minimal reheating temperature of $T_{\\rm RH} = 2.3 \\times 10^{8} \\, \\rm{GeV}$. \nHowever, this result does depend on which K\\\"ahler frame one choose to take a field-independent gauge kinetic function. For example, in the symmetric basis with a minimal gauge kinetic function, the coupling of the canonical inflaton to gauge fields vanishes at the tree level and there is no contribution from the anomalies. \n\nWe used the decay rates (as a function of $\\alpha$) to determine the reheating history\nself-consistently. For every value of $\\alpha$, the scalar amplitude fixes the normalization of the inflationary potential and hence the physical inflaton mass. The microscopic decay rate then fixes the radiation density, the averaged reheating equation of state, and the number of $e$-folds $N_*$. Consequently, $\\alpha$ and $T_{\\rm RH}$ are not independent phenomenological parameters in this realization. This produces a single self-consistent trajectory in the $(n_s,r)$ plane, as seen in Fig.~\\ref{fig:nsrplot1}. At the conformal no-scale point $\\alpha=1$, the tree-level trilinear matter channel vanishes and the reheating floor is set by the anomaly-induced coupling to the gauge sector. We find that the generalized no-scale model is compatible with {\\it Planck} \\cite{Planck} data for $\\alpha \\le 20$ and with the combination of SPT, {\\it Planck}, ACT and BICEP/Keck data \\cite{SPT-3G:2025bzu} for $1 \\le \\alpha \\le 20$.\n\nWe also considered the string-derived ANR model~\\cite{ANR1,ANR2,ANO}, for which\n$\\alpha_{\\rm ANR}=2/3$. This example illustrates the importance of\ntransforming both the K\\\"ahler potential and the superpotential\nconsistently. A top Yukawa interaction that is constant in the symmetric\nbasis acquires an explicit factor $T+\\tfrac12$ after a transformation to the ($T,C)$ basis. This induced modulus dependence cancels the apparent contribution from the matter metrics at linear order, so the ordinary top Yukawa\ninteraction does not provide for reheating despite having $\\alpha \\ne 1$. By contrast, the\n$\\lambda_6$ operator contains an explicit coupling of the inflaton to matter and has a nonzero first derivative at the vacuum, providing a direct connection between inflaton decay and the neutrino\nsector.\n\nFinally, we examined an $R^3$ deformation of Starobinsky\nsupergravity. The additional chiral field $X$ is auxiliary on the\ninflationary trajectory and is eliminated through its algebraic\nequation of motion. The resulting deformation changes the inflaton\npotential and the sgoldstino metric \\cite{Antoniadis:2026uzn}. However, when visible matter is introduced independently through\n$-\\phi_m\\bar\\phi_m/3$ inside the no-scale logarithm, its metric remains $Z_{\\phi_m}\\propto(T+\\bar T)^{-1}$, and its effective modular weight remains unity. Thus the $R^3$\ndeformation does not by itself generate a new explicit\n$\\beta$-dependent decay vertex into such visible fields. Its effects on visible-sector reheating are indirect, through the modified inflationary normalization and background evolution, unless additional operators couple the visible sector directly to $X$ or to the deformation.\n\nOur results demonstrate that reheating is a sensitive probe of the\nK\\\"ahler geometry, the matter embedding, and the K\\\"ahler frame in which microscopic superpotential couplings are specified. A consistent treatment of these ingredients removes the apparent freedom to choose the reheating temperature independently of the inflationary model and allows CMB observables to test the underlying no-scale construction.\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\section*{Acknowledgments}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\nWe would like to thank M. Garcia and W. Ke for helpful conversations. I.A. and D.V.N. would like to thank the Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics at New York University, where part of this work was performed, for hospitality.\nThis research of I.A. was supported in part by the Higher Education and Science Committee of MESCS RA (Research Project N 24RL-1C036). The work of J.E. was supported by the United Kingdom STFC Grant ST/T000759/1. The work of K.A.O. was supported in part by DOE grant DE-SC0011842 at the University of Minnesota. The work of S.V. was supported by the Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% Appendices\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\appendix\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\section{Jordan frame interpretation for \\texorpdfstring\n{$\\alpha\\neq1$}{alpha neq 1}}\n\\label{app:jordanframe}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\nIn the ordinary Starobinsky case, the relation between the Jordan frame $F(R)$ description and the no-scale supergravity description is well understood. Starting from \n\\begin{equation}\n{\\cal A}\n=\n-\\frac12\\int d^4x\\sqrt{-g}\\left(R-F(R)\\right) \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nwith\n\\begin{equation}\nF(R)=\\frac{R^2}{6m^2} \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\none may introduce an auxiliary field $\\Phi$ and rewrite the action as\n\\begin{equation}\n{\\cal A}\n=\n-\\frac12\\int d^4x\\sqrt{-g}\n\\left[\nR-F(-\\Phi)-F'(-\\Phi)(R+\\Phi)\n\\right] \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nEliminating $\\Phi$ gives $\\Phi=-R$, recovering the original theory. The\nEinstein frame metric is obtained through the conformal transformation\n\\begin{equation}\n\\tilde g_{\\mu\\nu}=e^{2\\Omega}g_{\\mu\\nu},\n\\qquad\ne^{2\\Omega}=1-F'(-\\Phi) \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nFor the Starobinsky choice this gives\n\\begin{equation}\ne^{2\\Omega}=1+2 \\alpha_S \\Phi,\n\\qquad\n\\alpha_S=\\frac{1}{6m^2} \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nand the canonically-normalized scalar is\n\\begin{equation}\n\\phi=\\sqrt6\\,M_P\\,\\Omega \\, .\n\\label{canO}\n\\end{equation}\nThe Einstein frame potential is then\n\\begin{equation}\nV(\\phi)\n=\n\\frac34 m^2 M_P^2\n\\left(1-e^{-\\sqrt{2/3}\\, \\phi/M_P} \\right)^2 \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nThis is the usual Starobinsky potential and corresponds to the standard\n$\\alpha=1$ no-scale model.\n\nOne might try to generalize this construction by choosing an $F(R)$ function such that\n\\begin{equation}\n1-F'(-\\Phi)=(1+2\\alpha_S\\Phi)^\\alpha \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nor equivalently\n\\begin{equation}\ne^{2\\Omega}=(1+2\\alpha_S\\Phi)^\\alpha \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nHowever, this does not reproduce the kinetic geometry of a no-scale\n$\\alpha$-attractor. Defining\n\\begin{equation}\nY\\equiv 1+2\\alpha_S\\Phi \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nthe conformal factor implies\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Omega=\\frac{\\alpha}{2}\\ln Y \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nSince the Einstein frame scalar from an $F(R)$ theory is universally given by Eq.~(\\ref{canO}), \none obtains\n\\begin{equation}\n\\phi\n=\n\\alpha\\sqrt{\\frac32}\\,M_P\\ln Y \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nIn contrast, in a no-scale $\\alpha$-attractor with\n\\begin{equation}\nK=-3\\alpha\\ln(T+\\bar T) \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nthe canonically-normalized modulus is\n\\begin{equation}\n\\phi_{\\rm ns}\n=\n\\sqrt{\\frac{3\\alpha}{2}}\\,\nM_P\\ln(T+\\bar T) \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nThus the kinetic coefficients agree only for\n\\begin{equation}\n\\alpha=1 \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nFor $\\alpha\\neq1$, the naive $F(R)$ deformation gives a kinetic coefficient\nproportional to $\\alpha^2$, whereas the no-scale $\\alpha$-attractor geometry requires a coefficient proportional to $\\alpha$.\n\nThe same point can be seen from the K\\\"ahler potential. If\n\\begin{equation}\ne^{2\\Omega}=Y^\\alpha \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nthen\n\\begin{equation}\n\\ln Y=\\frac{2\\Omega}{\\alpha} \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nTherefore\n\\begin{equation}\nK=-3 \\, \\alpha\\ln Y=-6\\Omega \\, .\n\\end{equation}\n\n\nHowever, we note that the corresponding Einstein frame\npotential is not the usual $\\alpha$-attractor potential. If one chooses\n\\begin{equation}\nF(R)\n=\nR+\\frac{1}{2\\alpha_S(1+\\alpha)}(1-2\\alpha_SR)^{1+\\alpha}\n-\\frac{1}{\\alpha_S(1+\\alpha)} \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nso that the vacuum energy vanishes at $\\Phi=0$, then\n\\begin{equation}\n1-F'(-\\Phi)=Y^\\alpha ,\n\\qquad\nY=1+2\\alpha_S\\Phi \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nand the Einstein frame potential is\n\\begin{equation}\nV\n=\n\\frac{M_P^2}{4\\alpha_S}\n\\left[\n\\frac{\\alpha}{1+\\alpha}Y^{1-\\alpha}\n-\nY^{-\\alpha}\n+\n\\frac{1}{1+\\alpha}Y^{-2\\alpha}\n\\right] \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nUsing $Y=e^{2\\Omega/\\alpha}$, this can be written as\n\\begin{equation}\nV\n=\n\\frac32m^2 M_P^2\n\\left[\n\\frac{\\alpha}{1+\\alpha}\ne^{\\frac{2(1-\\alpha)}{\\alpha}\\Omega}\n-\ne^{-2\\Omega}\n+\n\\frac{1}{1+\\alpha}e^{-4\\Omega}\n\\right] \\, .\n\\end{equation}\nFor $\\alpha=1$, this reduces to\n\\begin{equation}\nV\n=\n\\frac34m^2 M_P^2(1-e^{-2\\Omega})^2\n=\n\\frac34m^2 M_P^2\n\\left(1-e^{-\\sqrt{2/3}\\,\\phi/M_P}\\right)^2 \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nas expected. For $\\alpha\\neq1$, however, this potential is not the standard no-scale $\\alpha$-attractor potential.\n\nWe therefore cannot identify a general Jordan frame non-minimal coupling parameter with the no-scale parameter $\\alpha$. The robust correspondence occurs only at the special cancellation point:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\alpha=1\n\\qquad\\Longleftrightarrow\\qquad\n\\xi=\\frac16 \\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere the no-scale cancellation of tree-level matter decays is analogous to the conformal cancellation of scalaron decays into conformally-coupled scalars. Away from this point, the $\\alpha$-deformed no-scale theory should be treated directly in the Einstein frame supergravity description rather than inferred from a naive $F(R)$ deformation.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\\begin{thebibliography}{99}\n\n\\bibitem{Staro}\nA.~A.~Starobinsky,\n%``A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,''\nPhys.\\ Lett.\\ B {\\bf 91}, 99 (1980).\n%%CITATION = PHLTA,B91,99;%%\n\n\\bibitem{WhittStelle}\nK.~S.~Stelle,\n %``Classical Gravity with Higher Derivatives,''\n Gen.\\ Rel.\\ Grav.\\ {\\bf 9} (1978) 353;\n% doi:10.1007/BF00760427;\n %%CITATION = doi:10.1007/BF00760427;%%\n %667 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 22 Nov 2017\n B.~Whitt,\n %``Fourth Order Gravity as General Relativity Plus Matter,''\n Phys.\\ Lett.\\ {\\bf 145B} (1984) 176.\n% doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)90332-0.\n %%CITATION = doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)90332-0;%%\n %468 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 22 Nov 2017\n\n %\\cite{Kalara:1990ar}\n\\bibitem{Kalara:1990ar}\nS.~Kalara, N.~Kaloper and K.~A.~Olive,\n%``Theories of Inflation and Conformal Transformations,''\nNucl. Phys. B \\textbf{341}, 252-272 (1990);\n%doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90270-N\n%68 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 24 Aug 2020\n%\\cite{Maeda:1988ab}\n%\\bibitem{Maeda:1988ab}\nK.~i.~Maeda,\n%``Towards the Einstein-Hilbert Action via Conformal Transformation,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{39} (1989), 3159.\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.39.3159\n%526 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 16 Apr 2024\n\n\n %\\cite{Guth:1980zm}\n\\bibitem{Guth:1980zm}\nA.~H.~Guth,\n%``The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{23}, 347-356 (1981).\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347\n%9971 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 20 Mar 2024\n\n\\bibitem{MC}\n V.~F.~Mukhanov and G.~V.~Chibisov,\n %``Quantum Fluctuation and Nonsingular Universe. (In Russian),''\n JETP Lett.\\ {\\bf 33}, 532 (1981)\n [Pisma Zh.\\ Eksp.\\ Teor.\\ Fiz.\\ {\\bf 33}, 549 (1981)];\n %%CITATION = JTPLA,33,532;%%\n A.~A.~Starobinsky,\n %``The Perturbation Spectrum Evolving from a Nonsingular Initially De-Sitte r Cosmology and the Microwave Background Anisotropy,''\n Sov.\\ Astron.\\ Lett.\\ {\\bf 9}, 302 (1983).\n %%CITATION = SALED,9,302;%%\n \n \\bibitem{pert}\n W.H. Press, {\\it Phys. Scr.} {\\bf 21} (1980) 702;\n\tS.W. Hawking, {\\it Phys. Lett.} {\\bf 115B} (1982) 295;\n\tA.A. Starobinsky, {\\it Phys. Lett.} {\\bf 117B} (1982) 175;\n\tA.H. Guth and S.Y. Pi, {\\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\\bf 49} (1982) 1110;\n\tJ.M. Bardeen, P.J. Steinhardt and M.S. Turner, {\\it Phys. Rev.} \n{\\bf D28} (1983) 679.\n\n\\bibitem{reviews}\n K.~A.~Olive,\n %``Inflation,''\n Phys.\\ Rept.\\ {\\bf 190} (1990) 307;\n %%CITATION = PRPLC,190,307;%%\nA. D. Linde, {\\it Particle \nPhysics and\nInflationary Cosmology} (Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, 1990); \n D.~H.~Lyth and A.~Riotto,\n%``Particle physics models of inflation and the cosmological density perturbation,''\n{\\it Phys.\\ Rep.} {\\bf 314} (1999) 1\n[arXiv:hep-ph/9807278];\n%\\cite{Linde:2000kn}\n%\\bibitem{Linde:2000kn}\nA.~D.~Linde,\n%``Inflationary cosmology,''\nPhys. Rept. \\textbf{333}, 575-591 (2000);\n%doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00038-7\n%33 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 20 Jul 2020\nJ.~Martin, C.~Ringeval and V.~Vennin,\n %``Encyclop\\UTF{00D4}\\UTF{00F8}Ωdia Inflationaris,''\n Phys.\\ Dark Univ.\\ {\\bf 5-6}, 75-235 (2014)\n [arXiv:1303.3787 [astro-ph.CO]];\n %%CITATION = ARXIV:1303.3787;%%\n J.~Martin, C.~Ringeval, R.~Trotta and V.~Vennin,\n %``The Best Inflationary Models After Planck,''\n JCAP {\\bf 1403} (2014) 039\n [arXiv:1312.3529 [astro-ph.CO]];\n %%CITATION = ARXIV:1312.3529;%%\n %46 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 23 May 2015\n J.~Martin,\n %``The Observational Status of Cosmic Inflation after Planck,''\n Astrophys.\\ Space Sci.\\ Proc.\\ {\\bf 45}, 41 (2016);\n % doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44769-8_2\n [arXiv:1502.05733 [astro-ph.CO]].\n %%CITATION = doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44769-8_2;%%\n J.~Ellis and D.~Wands,\n%``Inflation (2023),''\narXiv:2312.13238 [astro-ph.CO], in\nS.~Navas \\textit{et al.} [Particle Data Group],\n%``Review of particle physics,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{110} (2024) no.3, 030001\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001.\n%\\cite{WMAP:2003elm}\n\n\\bibitem{no-scale}\nE.~Cremmer, S.~Ferrara, C.~Kounnas and D.~V.~Nanopoulos,\n %``Naturally Vanishing Cosmological Constant in N=1 Supergravity,''\n Phys.\\ Lett.\\ B {\\bf 133} (1983) 61;\n %%CITATION = PHLTA,B133,61;%%\n %548 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Apr 2013\n A.~B.~Lahanas and D.~V.~Nanopoulos,\n %``The Road to No Scale Supergravity,''\n Phys.\\ Rept.\\ {\\bf 145} (1987) 1.\n %%CITATION = PRPLC,145,1;%%\n %677 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 08 Jul 2013\n\n \\bibitem{eno6}\n J.~Ellis, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and K.~A.~Olive,\n %``No-Scale Supergravity Realization of the Starobinsky Model of Inflation,''\n Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.\\ {\\bf 111} (2013) 111301 \n [arXiv:1305.1247 [hep-th]].\n %%CITATION = ARXIV:1305.1247;%%\n\n%\\cite{Ellis:2020lnc}\n\\bibitem{building}\nJ.~Ellis, M.~A.~G.~Garcia, N.~Nagata, D.~V.~Nanopoulos, K.~A.~Olive and S.~Verner,\n%``Building models of inflation in no-scale supergravity,''\nInt. J. Mod. Phys. D \\textbf{29}, no.16, 2030011 (2020)\n%doi:10.1142/S0218271820300116\n[arXiv:2009.01709 [hep-ph]].\n%65 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 27 May \n\n %\\cite{Ema:2024sit}\n\\bibitem{Ema:2024sit}\nY.~Ema, M.~A.~G.~Garcia, W.~Ke, K.~A.~Olive and S.~Verner,\n%``Inflaton Decay in No-Scale Supergravity and Starobinsky-like Models,''\nUniverse \\textbf{10}, no.6, 239 (2024)\n%doi:10.3390/universe10060239\n[arXiv:2404.14545 [hep-ph]].\n%13 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 27 May 2026\n\n \n\n %\\cite{Scherrer:1984fd}\n\\bibitem{Scherrer:1984fd}\nR.~J.~Scherrer and M.~S.~Turner,\n%``Decaying Particles Do Not Heat Up the Universe,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{31}, 681 (1985).\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.31.681\n%271 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 16 Oct 2024\n\n \\bibitem{Giudice:2000ex}\n G.~F.~Giudice, E.~W.~Kolb and A.~Riotto,\n %``Largest temperature of the radiation era and its cosmological implications,''\n Phys.\\ Rev.\\ D {\\bf 64} (2001) 023508\n % doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.023508\n [hep-ph/0005123];\n %%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.023508;%%\n %319 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 04 Apr 2018\n D.~J.~H.~Chung, E.~W.~Kolb and A.~Riotto,\n %``Production of massive particles during reheating,''\n Phys.\\ Rev.\\ D {\\bf 60} (1999) 063504\n% doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.063504\n [hep-ph/9809453].\n %%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.063504;%%\n %270 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 04 Apr 2018\n\n\\bibitem{GKMO1}\nM.~A.~G.~Garcia, K.~Kaneta, Y.~Mambrini and K.~A.~Olive,\n%``Reheating and Post-inflationary Production of Dark Matter,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{101} (2020) no.12, 123507\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.123507\n[arXiv:2004.08404 [hep-ph]].\n\n\n\n\n\\bibitem{GKMO2}\n%\\cite{Garcia:2020wiy}\nM.~A.~G.~Garcia, K.~Kaneta, Y.~Mambrini and K.~A.~Olive,\n%``Inflaton Oscillations and Post-Inflationary Reheating,''\nJCAP \\textbf{04}, 012 (2021)\n%doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/012\n[arXiv:2012.10756 [hep-ph]].\n%2 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 19 Apr 2021\n\n \\bibitem{Planck}\n %\\cite{Planck:2018vyg}\n%\\bibitem{Planck:2018vyg}\nN.~Aghanim \\textit{et al.} [Planck],\n%``Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,''\nAstron. Astrophys. \\textbf{641}, A6 (2020)\n[erratum: Astron. Astrophys. \\textbf{652}, C4 (2021)]\n%doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910\n[arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]];\n%18470 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 15 Aug 2025\n %\\cite{Planck:2018jri}\n%\\bibitem{Planck:2018jri}\nY.~Akrami \\textit{et al.} [Planck Collaboration],\n%``Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,''\nAstron. Astrophys. \\textbf{641}, A10 (2020)\n%doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887\n[arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]].\n%3955 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 15 Aug 2025\n\n %\\cite{Watanabe:2006ku}\n\\bibitem{Watanabe:2006ku}\nY.~Watanabe and E.~Komatsu,\n%``Reheating of the universe after inflation with f(phi)R gravity,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{75} (2007), 061301\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.061301\n[arXiv:gr-qc/0612120 [gr-qc]];\n%42 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Apr 2024\n%\\cite{Bernal:2020qyu}\n%\\bibitem{Bernal:2020qyu}\nN.~Bernal, J.~Rubio and H.~Veerm\\\"ae,\n%``UV Freeze-in in Starobinsky Inflation,''\nJCAP \\textbf{10} (2020), 021\n%doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/10/021\n[arXiv:2006.02442 [hep-ph]].\n%46 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 11 Apr 2024\n\n%\\cite{Gorbunov:2012ns}\n\\bibitem{Gorbunov:2012ns}\nD.~Gorbunov and A.~Tokareva,\n%``$R^2$-inflation with conformal SM Higgs field,''\nJCAP \\textbf{12}, 021 (2013)\n%doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/12/021\n[arXiv:1212.4466 [astro-ph.CO]].\n%46 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 28 Mar 2024\n\n\n\n%\\cite{Kamada:2019pmx}\n\\bibitem{Kamada:2019pmx}\nA.~Kamada,\n%``On Scalaron Decay via the Trace of Energy-Momentum Tensor,''\nJHEP \\textbf{07}, 172 (2019)\n%doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2019)172\n[arXiv:1902.05209 [hep-ph]];\n%5 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 28 Mar 2024\n%\\cite{Kamada:2019euz}\n%\\bibitem{Kamada:2019euz}\nA.~Kamada and T.~Kuwahara,\n%``Lessons from $T^{\\mu}_{~ \\mu}$ on inflation models: Two-scalar theory and Yukawa theory,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{101}, no.9, 096012 (2020)\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.096012\n[arXiv:1909.04228 [hep-ph]];\n%3 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 05 Apr 2024\n%\\cite{Kamada:2019hpp}\n%\\bibitem{Kamada:2019hpp}\nA.~Kamada and T.~Kuwahara,\n%``Lessons from $T^{\\mu}_{~ \\mu}$ on inflation models: Two-loop renormalization of $\\eta$ in the scalar QED,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{103}, no.11, 116001 (2021)\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.116001\n[arXiv:1909.04229 [hep-ph]].\n%3 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 05 Apr 2024\n\n \n\n%\\cite{Ellis:2017xwz}\n\\bibitem{eno9}\nJ.~Ellis, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and K.~A.~Olive,\n%``From $R^2$ gravity to no-scale supergravity,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{97}, no.4, 043530 (2018)\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.043530\n[arXiv:1711.11051 [hep-th]].\n%28 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 27 May 2026\n\n\n \\bibitem{DLT}\nG.~D.~Diamandis, A.~B.~Lahanas and K.~Tamvakis,\n %``Towards a formulation of $f(R)$ supergravity,''\n Phys.\\ Rev.\\ D {\\bf 92} (2015) no.10, 105023\n% doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.105023\n [arXiv:1509.01065 [hep-th]];\n %%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.105023;%%\n %8 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 22 Nov 2017\n G.~A.~Diamandis, B.~C.~Georgalas, K.~Kaskavelis, A.~B.~Lahanas and G.~Pavlopoulos,\n %``Deforming the Starobinsky model in ghost-free higher derivative supergravities,''\n Phys.\\ Rev.\\ D {\\bf 96}, no. 4, 044033 (2017)\n% doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.044033\n [arXiv:1704.07617 [hep-th]].\n %%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.044033;%%\n \n%\\cite{Antoniadis:2026uzn}\n\\bibitem{Antoniadis:2026uzn}\nI.~Antoniadis, C.~Markou and D.~V.~Nanopoulos,\n%``Ultraviolet completion of Starobinsky inflation,''\narXiv:2605.05295 [hep-th].\n%0 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 27 May 2026\n\n \\bibitem{Cecotti}\nS.~Cecotti,\n %``Higher Derivative Supergravity Is Equivalent To Standard Supergravity Coupled To Matter. 1.,''\n Phys.\\ Lett.\\ B {\\bf 190} (1987) 86.\n %%CITATION = PHLTA,B190,86;%%\n\n%\\cite{Endo:2006xg}\n\\bibitem{Endo:2006xg}\nM.~Endo, K.~Kadota, K.~A.~Olive, F.~Takahashi and T.~T.~Yanagida,\n%``The Decay of the Inflaton in No-scale Supergravity,''\nJCAP \\textbf{02}, 018 (2007)\n%doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/02/018\n[arXiv:hep-ph/0612263 [hep-ph]].\n%50 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 27 May 2026\n\n%\\cite{Ellis:2015pla}\n\\bibitem{egno4}\nJ.~Ellis, M.~A.~G.~Garcia, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and K.~A.~Olive,\n%``Calculations of Inflaton Decays and Reheating: with Applications to No-Scale Inflation Models,''\nJCAP \\textbf{07}, 050 (2015)\n%doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/07/050\n[arXiv:1505.06986 [hep-ph]].\n%144 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 27 May 2026\n\n%\\cite{Antoniadis:2020txn}\n\\bibitem{ANR1}\nI.~Antoniadis, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and J.~Rizos,\n%``Cosmology of the string derived flipped $SU(5)$,''\nJCAP \\textbf{03}, 017 (2021)\n%doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/017\n[arXiv:2011.09396 [hep-th]].\n%20 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 27 May 2026\n\n%\\cite{Antoniadis:2021rfm}\n\\bibitem{ANR2}\nI.~Antoniadis, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and J.~Rizos,\n%``Particle physics and cosmology of the string derived no-scale flipped SU(5),''\nEur. Phys. J. C \\textbf{82}, no.4, 377 (2022)\n%doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10353-6\n[arXiv:2112.01211 [hep-th]].\n%14 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 27 May 2026\n\n%\\cite{Antoniadis:2024ypf}\n\\bibitem{ANO}\nI.~Antoniadis, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and K.~A.~Olive,\n%``R$^{2}$-inflation derived from 4d strings, the role of the dilaton, and turning the Swampland into a mirage,''\nJHEP \\textbf{06}, 155 (2025)\n%doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2025)155\n[arXiv:2410.16541 [hep-th]].\n%8 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 27 May 2026\n\n%\\cite{Gialamas:2025ofz}\n\\bibitem{Gialamas:2025ofz}\nI.~D.~Gialamas, T.~Katsoulas and K.~Tamvakis,\n%``Keeping the relation between the Starobinsky model and no-scale supergravity ACTive,''\nJCAP \\textbf{09}, 060 (2025)\n%doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/060\n[arXiv:2505.03608 [gr-qc]].\n%70 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 09 Jun 2026\n\n\n %\\cite{Ellis:2013nxa}\n\\bibitem{avatars}\nJ.~Ellis, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and K.~A.~Olive,\n%``Starobinsky-like Inflationary Models as Avatars of No-Scale Supergravity,''\nJCAP \\textbf{10}, 009 (2013)\n%doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/10/009\n[arXiv:1307.3537 [hep-th]].\n%300 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 27 May 2026\n\n\n\n%\\cite{Ellis:2018zya}\n\\bibitem{enov1}\nJ.~Ellis, D.~V.~Nanopoulos, K.~A.~Olive and S.~Verner,\n%``A general classification of Starobinsky-like inflationary avatars of SU(2,1)/SU(2) $\\times$ U(1) no-scale supergravity,''\nJHEP \\textbf{03}, 099 (2019)\n%doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2019)099\n[arXiv:1812.02192 [hep-th]].\n%10 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 19 Jun 2020\n\n\n\n%\\cite{Ellis:2026ceb}\n\\bibitem{egkko2}\nJ.~Ellis, T.~Gherghetta, K.~Kaneta, W.~Ke and K.~A.~Olive,\n%``Radiative corrections in supergravity models of inflation,''\nJHEP \\textbf{05}, 229 (2026)\n%doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2026)229\n[arXiv:2603.02389 [hep-ph]].\n%2 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 27 May 2026\n\n%\\cite{BICEP:2021xfz}\n\\bibitem{BICEP2021}\nP.~A.~R.~Ade \\textit{et al.} [BICEP and Keck Collaborations],\n%``Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,''\nPhys. Rev. Lett. \\textbf{127}, no.15, 151301 (2021)\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.151301\n[arXiv:2110.00483 [astro-ph.CO]].\n%28 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 19 Nov 2021 \n\n%\\cite{Tristram:2021tvh}\n\\bibitem{Tristram:2021tvh}\nM.~Tristram, A.~J.~Banday, K.~M.~G{\\'o}rski, R.~Keskitalo, C.~R.~Lawrence, K.~J.~Andersen, R.~B.~Barreiro, J.~Borrill, L.~P.~L.~Colombo and H.~K.~Eriksen, \\textit{et al.}\n%``Improved limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio using BICEP and Planck data,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{105}, no.8, 083524 (2022)\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.083524\n[arXiv:2112.07961 [astro-ph.CO]].\n%385 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 29 Jun 2026\n\n\n%\\cite{AtacamaCosmologyTelescope:2025blo}\n\\bibitem{AtacamaCosmologyTelescope:2025blo}\nT.~Louis \\textit{et al.} [Atacama Cosmology Telescope Collaboration],\n%``The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and {\\ensuremath{\\Lambda}}CDM parameters,''\nJCAP \\textbf{11}, 062 (2025)\n%doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/062\n[arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]].\n%609 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 19 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Antoniadis:2025pfa}\n\\bibitem{Antoniadis:2025pfa}\nI.~Antoniadis, J.~Ellis, W.~Ke, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and K.~A.~Olive,\n%``How accidental was inflation?,''\nJCAP \\textbf{08}, 090 (2025)\n%doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/08/090\n[arXiv:2504.12283 [hep-ph]].\n%38 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 19 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Ellis:2025ieh}\n\\bibitem{Ellis:2025ieh}\nJ.~Ellis, M.~A.~G.~Garc{\\'\\i}a, N.~Nagata, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and K.~A.~Olive,\n%``Deformations of Starobinsky inflation in no-scale SU(5) and SO(10) GUTs,''\nJCAP \\textbf{12}, 038 (2025)\n%doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/12/038\n[arXiv:2508.13279 [hep-ph]].\n%19 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 19 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Ellis:2025zrf}\n\\bibitem{EGOV}\nJ.~Ellis, M.~A.~G.~Garcia, K.~A.~Olive and S.~Verner,\n%``Constraints on attractor models of inflation and reheating from Planck, BICEP/Keck, ACT DR6, and SPT-3G data,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{113}, no.6, 063571 (2026)\n%doi:10.1103/d35r-7bn8\n[arXiv:2510.18656 [hep-ph]].\n%32 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 27 May 2026\n\n%\\cite{SPT-3G:2025bzu}\n\\bibitem{SPT-3G:2025bzu}\nE.~Camphuis \\textit{et al.} [SPT-3G],\n%``SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G main field,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{113}, no.8, 083504 (2026)\n%doi:10.1103/7wt3-9v2y\n[arXiv:2506.20707 [astro-ph.CO]].\n%268 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 19 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Ellis:2013nka}\n\\bibitem{eno8}\nJ.~Ellis, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and K.~A.~Olive,\n%``A no-scale supergravity framework for sub-Planckian physics,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{89}, no.4, 043502 (2014)\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.043502\n[arXiv:1310.4770 [hep-ph]].\n%77 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 22 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Kallosh:2011qk}\n\\bibitem{Kallosh:2011qk}\nR.~Kallosh, A.~Linde, K.~A.~Olive and T.~Rube,\n%``Chaotic inflation and supersymmetry breaking,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{84}, 083519 (2011)\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.083519\n[arXiv:1106.6025 [hep-th]].\n%118 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 22 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Endo:2006qk}\n\\bibitem{Endo:2006qk}\nM.~Endo, M.~Kawasaki, F.~Takahashi and T.~T.~Yanagida,\n%``Inflaton decay through supergravity effects,''\nPhys. Lett. B \\textbf{642}, 518-524 (2006)\n%doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.09.044\n[arXiv:hep-ph/0607170 [hep-ph]].\n%101 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 05 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Kallosh:2015zsa}\n\\bibitem{e-m}\nR.~Kallosh and A.~Linde,\n%``Escher in the Sky,''\nComptes Rendus Physique \\textbf{16}, 914-927 (2015)\n%doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2015.07.004\n[arXiv:1503.06785 [hep-th]].\n%80 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 19 Nov 2021\n\n%\\cite{Dudas:2017kfz}\n\\bibitem{Dudas:2017kfz}\nE.~Dudas, T.~Gherghetta, Y.~Mambrini and K.~A.~Olive,\n%``Inflation and High-Scale Supersymmetry with an EeV Gravitino,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{96}, no.11, 115032 (2017)\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.115032\n[arXiv:1710.07341 [hep-ph]].\n%69 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 22 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Kaneta:2019yjn}\n\\bibitem{Kaneta:2019yjn}\nK.~Kaneta, Y.~Mambrini, K.~A.~Olive and S.~Verner,\n%``Inflation and Leptogenesis in High-Scale Supersymmetry,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{101}, no.1, 015002 (2020)\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.015002\n[arXiv:1911.02463 [hep-ph]].\n%28 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 22 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Ellis:2021kad}\n\\bibitem{Ellis:2021kad}\nJ.~Ellis, M.~A.~G.~Garcia, D.~V.~Nanopoulos, K.~A.~Olive and S.~Verner,\n%``BICEP/Keck constraints on attractor models of inflation and reheating,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{105}, no.4, 043504 (2022)\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.043504\n[arXiv:2112.04466 [hep-ph]].\n%65 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 24 Jun 2025\n\n\n\n\n\\bibitem{LiddleLeach} \n A.~R.~Liddle and S.~M.~Leach,\n %``How long before the end of inflation were observable perturbations produced?,''\n Phys.\\ Rev.\\ D {\\bf 68}, 103503 (2003)\n [astro-ph/0305263];\n %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH/0305263;%%\n \n %\\cite{Martin:2010kz}\n\\bibitem{Martin:2010kz}\nJ.~Martin and C.~Ringeval,\n%``First CMB Constraints on the Inflationary Reheating Temperature,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{82}, 023511 (2010)\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.023511\n[arXiv:1004.5525 [astro-ph.CO]].\n%226 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 20 Nov 2021\n\n%\\cite{Balkenhol:2025wms}\n\\bibitem{Balkenhol:2025wms}\nL.~Balkenhol, E.~Camphuis, F.~Finelli, K.~Benabed, F.~R.~Bouchet, J.~Carron, S.~Galli, E.~Hivon, A.~R.~Khalife and L.~Knox, \\textit{et al.}\n%``Inflation at the End of 2025: Constraints on $r$ and $n_s$ Using the Latest CMB and BAO Data,''\n[arXiv:2512.10613 [astro-ph.CO]].\n%21 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 29 Jun 2026\n\n \\bibitem{Barr}\nS.~M.~Barr,\n %``A New Symmetry Breaking Pattern for SO(10) and Proton Decay,''\n Phys.\\ Lett.\\ {\\bf 112B} (1982) 219;\n% doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90966-2.\n %%CITATION = doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90966-2;%%\n %443 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 16 Jan 2017\n S.~M.~Barr,\n %``Some Comments on Flipped SU(5) X U(1) and Flipped Unification in General,''\n Phys.\\ Rev.\\ D {\\bf 40}, 2457 (1989).\n% doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.40.2457\n %%CITATION = doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.40.2457;%%\n\n\\bibitem{DKN}\nJ.~P.~Derendinger, J.~E.~Kim and D.~V.~Nanopoulos,\n %``Anti-SU(5),''\n Phys.\\ Lett.\\ {\\bf 139B} (1984) 170.\n % doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)91238-3.\n %%CITATION = doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)91238-3;%%\n %305 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 16 Jan 2017\n\n \\bibitem{flipped2}\n I.~Antoniadis, J.~R.~Ellis, J.~S.~Hagelin and D.~V.~Nanopoulos,\n %``Supersymmetric Flipped SU(5) Revitalized,''\n Phys.\\ Lett.\\ B {\\bf 194}, 231 (1987).\n% doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90533-8\n %%CITATION = doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90533-8;%%\n\n \\bibitem{AEHN}\n I.~Antoniadis, J.~R.~Ellis, J.~S.~Hagelin and D.~V.~Nanopoulos,\n %``GUT Model Building with Fermionic Four-Dimensional Strings,''\n Phys.\\ Lett.\\ B {\\bf 205} (1988) 459;\n% doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)90978-1;\n %%CITATION = doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)90978-1;%%\n %199 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 16 Jan 2017\n %``An Improved SU(5) x U(1) Model from Four-Dimensional String,''\n Phys.\\ Lett.\\ B {\\bf 208} (1988) 209\n Addendum: [Phys.\\ Lett.\\ B {\\bf 213} (1988) 562];\n% doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)90419-4;\n %%CITATION = doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)90419-4;%%\n %211 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 16 Jan 2017\n %``The Flipped SU(5) x U(1) String Model Revamped,''\n Phys.\\ Lett.\\ B {\\bf 231} (1989) 65.\n% doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)90115-9.\n %%CITATION = doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)90115-9;%%\n %505 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 16 Jan 2017\n\n \\bibitem{EGNNO2}\n J.~Ellis, M.~A.~G.~Garc{\\' i}a, N.~Nagata, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and K.~A.~Olive,\n %``Starobinsky-like Inflation, Supercosmology and Neutrino Masses in No-Scale Flipped SU(5),''\n JCAP {\\bf 1707} (2017) no.07, 006\n% doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/07/006\n [arXiv:1704.07331 [hep-ph]].\n %%CITATION = doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/07/006;%%\n %3 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 22 Nov 2017\n\n %\\cite{Ellis:2018moe}\n\\bibitem{EGNNO3}\nJ.~Ellis, M.~A.~Garc{\\' i}a, N.~Nagata, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and K.~A.~Olive,\n%``Symmetry Breaking and Reheating after Inflation in No-Scale Flipped SU(5),''\nJCAP \\textbf{04}, 009 (2019)\n%doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/009\n[arXiv:1812.08184 [hep-ph]].\n%11 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 23 Jun 2020\n\n \n %\\cite{Ellis:2019jha}\n\\bibitem{EGNNO4}\nJ.~Ellis, M.~A.~Garc{\\' i}a, N.~Nagata, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and K.~A.~Olive,\n%``Cosmology with a master coupling in flipped SU(5) $\\times$ U(1): the $\\lambda_6$ universe,''\nPhys. Lett. B \\textbf{797}, 134864 (2019)\n%doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134864\n[arXiv:1906.08483 [hep-ph]].\n%7 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Jun 2020\n\n%\\cite{Ellis:2019opr}\n\\bibitem{EGNNO5}\nJ.~Ellis, M.~A.~Garc{\\' i}a, N.~Nagata, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and K.~A.~Olive,\n%``Superstring-Inspired Particle Cosmology: Inflation, Neutrino Masses, Leptogenesis, Dark Matter & the SUSY Scale,''\nJCAP \\textbf{01}, 035 (2020)\n%doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/01/035\n[arXiv:1910.11755 [hep-ph]].\n%4 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Jun 2020\n\n %\\cite{Ellis:2020qad}\n\\bibitem{EGNNO6}\nJ.~Ellis, M.~A.~Garc{\\' i}a, N.~Nagata, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and K.~A.~Olive,\n%``Proton Decay: Flipped vs Unflipped SU(5),''\nJHEP \\textbf{05}, 021 (2020)\n%doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2020)021\n[arXiv:2003.03285 [hep-ph]].\n%2 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 25 Jun 2020\n\n\n\n\n %\\cite{Endo:2007sz}\n\\bibitem{Endo:2007sz}\nM.~Endo, F.~Takahashi and T.~T.~Yanagida,\n%``Inflaton Decay in Supergravity,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{76} (2007), 083509\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.083509\n[arXiv:0706.0986 [hep-ph]].\n%185 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 19 Apr 2024\n\n\n%\\cite{Bagger:1999rd}\n\\bibitem{anom}\nJ.~A.~Bagger, T.~Moroi and E.~Poppitz,\n%``Anomaly mediation in supergravity theories,''\nJHEP \\textbf{04} (2000), 009\n%doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/04/009\n[arXiv:hep-th/9911029 [hep-th]];\n%363 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 15 Apr 2024\n%\\cite{Bagger:2000dh}\n%\\bibitem{Bagger:2000dh}\nJ.~A.~Bagger, T.~Moroi and E.~Poppitz,\n%``Quantum inconsistency of Einstein supergravity,''\nNucl. Phys. B \\textbf{594} (2001), 354-368\n%doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00551-4\n[arXiv:hep-th/0003282 [hep-th]].\n%16 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 15 Apr 2024\n\n\n%\\cite{Cremmer:1982en}\n\\bibitem{Cremmer:1982en}\nE.~Cremmer, S.~Ferrara, L.~Girardello and A.~Van Proeyen,\n%``Yang-Mills Theories with Local Supersymmetry: Lagrangian, Transformation Laws and SuperHiggs Effect,''\nNucl. Phys. B \\textbf{212} (1983), 413\ndoi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90679-X.\n%1299 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 19 Jun 2026\n\n\n\n%\\cite{Kaplunovsky:1994fg}\n\\bibitem{Kaplunovsky:1994fg}\nV.~Kaplunovsky and J.~Louis,\n%``Field dependent gauge couplings in locally supersymmetric effective quantum field theories,''\nNucl. Phys. B \\textbf{422} (1994), 57-124\n%doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)00150-2\n[arXiv:hep-th/9402005 [hep-th]].\n%260 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 19 Jun 2026\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\\end{thebibliography}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091176,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31976"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31976"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Huiqi Wang"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Shiyi Chen, Nicholas Saban, Collin Hargreaves, Huiqi Wang"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"TreeAgent: A Generalizable Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Bias Labeling in Forestry via Compiled Expert Rules and Vision-Language Models"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"9 pages, 2 figures"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.AI cs.MA"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Human-labeled data are widely used as reference annotations in ML, despite known variability across annotators in many expert-driven domains. In addition, expert annotation is slow, inconsistent, and remains a major bottleneck for scaling tasks like tree height bias classification in forestry remote sensing. We propose a multi-agent system (MAS) that orchestrates expert decision trees with Vision-Language Models (VLMs), treating the decision tree as a structural prior while VLMs perform localized semantic perception at individual nodes, with multi-agent voting to mitigate VLM stochasticity. We formalize a Decoupled Declarative Decision (D3) Framework that enables zero-modification generalization across diverse expert-defined decision structures. On a tree bias classification testbed, our framework outperforms supervised ML baselines and reduces the amount of expert labeling effort required. These results suggest that agentic orchestration of VLMs with expert priors can reproduce expert-defined labeling procedures at substantially lower annotation cost while maintaining interpretability."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:16:59 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:16:59 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Chen","Shiyi",""],["Saban","Nicholas",""],["Hargreaves","Collin",""],["Wang","Huiqi",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Chen\",\n \"Shiyi\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Saban\",\n \"Nicholas\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Hargreaves\",\n \"Collin\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Wang\",\n \"Huiqi\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: algorithm.sty\n================================================\n% ALGORITHM STYLE -- Released 8 April 1996\n% for LaTeX-2e\n% Copyright -- 1994 Peter Williams\n% E-mail Peter.Williams@dsto.defence.gov.au\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesPackage{algorithm}\n\\typeout{Document Style `algorithm' - floating environment}\n\n\\RequirePackage{float}\n\\RequirePackage{ifthen}\n\\newcommand{\\ALG@within}{nothing}\n\\newboolean{ALG@within}\n\\setboolean{ALG@within}{false}\n\\newcommand{\\ALG@floatstyle}{ruled}\n\\newcommand{\\ALG@name}{Algorithm}\n\\newcommand{\\listalgorithmname}{List of \\ALG@name s}\n\n% Declare Options\n% first appearance\n\\DeclareOption{plain}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@floatstyle}{plain}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{ruled}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@floatstyle}{ruled}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{boxed}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@floatstyle}{boxed}\n}\n% then numbering convention\n\\DeclareOption{part}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@within}{part}\n \\setboolean{ALG@within}{true}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{chapter}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@within}{chapter}\n \\setboolean{ALG@within}{true}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{section}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@within}{section}\n \\setboolean{ALG@within}{true}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{subsection}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@within}{subsection}\n \\setboolean{ALG@within}{true}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{subsubsection}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@within}{subsubsection}\n \\setboolean{ALG@within}{true}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{nothing}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@within}{nothing}\n \\setboolean{ALG@within}{true}\n}\n\\DeclareOption*{\\edef\\ALG@name{\\CurrentOption}}\n\n% ALGORITHM\n%\n\\ProcessOptions\n\\floatstyle{\\ALG@floatstyle}\n\\ifthenelse{\\boolean{ALG@within}}{\n \\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\ALG@within}{part}}\n {\\newfloat{algorithm}{htbp}{loa}[part]}{}\n \\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\ALG@within}{chapter}}\n {\\newfloat{algorithm}{htbp}{loa}[chapter]}{}\n \\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\ALG@within}{section}}\n {\\newfloat{algorithm}{htbp}{loa}[section]}{}\n \\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\ALG@within}{subsection}}\n {\\newfloat{algorithm}{htbp}{loa}[subsection]}{}\n \\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\ALG@within}{subsubsection}}\n {\\newfloat{algorithm}{htbp}{loa}[subsubsection]}{}\n \\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\ALG@within}{nothing}}\n {\\newfloat{algorithm}{htbp}{loa}}{}\n}{\n \\newfloat{algorithm}{htbp}{loa}\n}\n\\floatname{algorithm}{\\ALG@name}\n\n\\newcommand{\\listofalgorithms}{\\listof{algorithm}{\\listalgorithmname}}\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: algorithmic.sty\n================================================\n% ALGORITHMIC STYLE -- Released 8 APRIL 1996\n% for LaTeX version 2e\n% Copyright -- 1994 Peter Williams\n% E-mail PeterWilliams@dsto.defence.gov.au\n%\n% Modified by Alex Smola (08/2000)\n% E-mail Alex.Smola@anu.edu.au\n%\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesPackage{algorithmic}\n\\typeout{Document Style `algorithmic' - environment}\n%\n\\RequirePackage{ifthen}\n\\RequirePackage{calc}\n\\newboolean{ALC@noend}\n\\setboolean{ALC@noend}{false}\n\\newcounter{ALC@line}\n\\newcounter{ALC@rem}\n\\newlength{\\ALC@tlm}\n%\n\\DeclareOption{noend}{\\setboolean{ALC@noend}{true}}\n%\n\\ProcessOptions\n%\n% ALGORITHMIC\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicrequire}{\\textbf{Require:}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicensure}{\\textbf{Ensure:}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmiccomment}[1]{\\{#1\\}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicend}{\\textbf{end}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicif}{\\textbf{if}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicthen}{\\textbf{then}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicelse}{\\textbf{else}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicelsif}{\\algorithmicelse\\ \\algorithmicif}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicendif}{\\algorithmicend\\ \\algorithmicif}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicfor}{\\textbf{for}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicforall}{\\textbf{for all}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicdo}{\\textbf{do}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicendfor}{\\algorithmicend\\ \\algorithmicfor}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicwhile}{\\textbf{while}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicendwhile}{\\algorithmicend\\ \\algorithmicwhile}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicloop}{\\textbf{loop}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicendloop}{\\algorithmicend\\ \\algorithmicloop}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicrepeat}{\\textbf{repeat}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicuntil}{\\textbf{until}}\n\n%changed by alex smola\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicinput}{\\textbf{input}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicoutput}{\\textbf{output}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicset}{\\textbf{set}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmictrue}{\\textbf{true}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicfalse}{\\textbf{false}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicand}{\\textbf{and\\ }}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicor}{\\textbf{or\\ }}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicfunction}{\\textbf{function}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicendfunction}{\\algorithmicend\\ \\algorithmicfunction}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicmain}{\\textbf{main}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicendmain}{\\algorithmicend\\ \\algorithmicmain}\n%end changed by alex smola\n\n\\def\\ALC@item[#1]{%\n\\if@noparitem \\@donoparitem\n \\else \\if@inlabel \\indent \\par \\fi\n \\ifhmode \\unskip\\unskip \\par \\fi\n \\if@newlist \\if@nobreak \\@nbitem \\else\n \\addpenalty\\@beginparpenalty\n \\addvspace\\@topsep \\addvspace{-\\parskip}\\fi\n \\else \\addpenalty\\@itempenalty \\addvspace\\itemsep\n \\fi\n \\global\\@inlabeltrue\n\\fi\n\\everypar{\\global\\@minipagefalse\\global\\@newlistfalse\n \\if@inlabel\\global\\@inlabelfalse \\hskip -\\parindent \\box\\@labels\n \\penalty\\z@ \\fi\n \\everypar{}}\\global\\@nobreakfalse\n\\if@noitemarg \\@noitemargfalse \\if@nmbrlist \\refstepcounter{\\@listctr}\\fi \\fi\n\\sbox\\@tempboxa{\\makelabel{#1}}%\n\\global\\setbox\\@labels\n \\hbox{\\unhbox\\@labels \\hskip \\itemindent\n \\hskip -\\labelwidth \\hskip -\\ALC@tlm\n \\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\labelwidth\n \\box\\@tempboxa\n \\else \\hbox to\\labelwidth {\\unhbox\\@tempboxa}\\fi\n \\hskip \\ALC@tlm}\\ignorespaces}\n%\n\\newenvironment{algorithmic}[1][0]{\n\\let\\@item\\ALC@item\n \\newcommand{\\ALC@lno}{%\n\\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\arabic{ALC@rem}}{0}}\n{{\\footnotesize \\arabic{ALC@line}:}}{}%\n}\n\\let\\@listii\\@listi\n\\let\\@listiii\\@listi\n\\let\\@listiv\\@listi\n\\let\\@listv\\@listi\n\\let\\@listvi\\@listi\n\\let\\@listvii\\@listi\n \\newenvironment{ALC@g}{\n \\begin{list}{\\ALC@lno}{ \\itemsep\\z@ \\itemindent\\z@\n \\listparindent\\z@ \\rightmargin\\z@ \n \\topsep\\z@ \\partopsep\\z@ \\parskip\\z@\\parsep\\z@\n \\leftmargin 1em\n \\addtolength{\\ALC@tlm}{\\leftmargin}\n }\n }\n {\\end{list}}\n \\newcommand{\\ALC@it}{\\addtocounter{ALC@line}{1}\\addtocounter{ALC@rem}{1}\\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\arabic{ALC@rem}}{#1}}{\\setcounter{ALC@rem}{0}}{}\\item}\n \\newcommand{\\ALC@com}[1]{\\ifthenelse{\\equal{##1}{default}}%\n{}{\\ \\algorithmiccomment{##1}}}\n \\newcommand{\\REQUIRE}{\\item[\\algorithmicrequire]}\n \\newcommand{\\ENSURE}{\\item[\\algorithmicensure]}\n \\newcommand{\\STATE}{\\ALC@it}\n \\newcommand{\\COMMENT}[1]{\\algorithmiccomment{##1}}\n%changes by alex smola\n \\newcommand{\\INPUT}{\\item[\\algorithmicinput]}\n \\newcommand{\\OUTPUT}{\\item[\\algorithmicoutput]}\n \\newcommand{\\SET}{\\item[\\algorithmicset]}\n% \\newcommand{\\TRUE}{\\algorithmictrue}\n% \\newcommand{\\FALSE}{\\algorithmicfalse}\n \\newcommand{\\AND}{\\algorithmicand}\n \\newcommand{\\OR}{\\algorithmicor}\n \\newenvironment{ALC@func}{\\begin{ALC@g}}{\\end{ALC@g}}\n \\newenvironment{ALC@main}{\\begin{ALC@g}}{\\end{ALC@g}}\n%end changes by alex smola\n \\newenvironment{ALC@if}{\\begin{ALC@g}}{\\end{ALC@g}}\n \\newenvironment{ALC@for}{\\begin{ALC@g}}{\\end{ALC@g}}\n \\newenvironment{ALC@whl}{\\begin{ALC@g}}{\\end{ALC@g}}\n \\newenvironment{ALC@loop}{\\begin{ALC@g}}{\\end{ALC@g}}\n \\newenvironment{ALC@rpt}{\\begin{ALC@g}}{\\end{ALC@g}}\n \\renewcommand{\\\\}{\\@centercr}\n \\newcommand{\\IF}[2][default]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicif\\ ##2\\ \\algorithmicthen%\n\\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@if}}\n \\newcommand{\\SHORTIF}[2]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicif\\ ##1\\\n \\algorithmicthen\\ {##2}}\n \\newcommand{\\ELSE}[1][default]{\\end{ALC@if}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicelse%\n\\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@if}}\n \\newcommand{\\ELSIF}[2][default]%\n{\\end{ALC@if}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicelsif\\ ##2\\ \\algorithmicthen%\n\\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@if}}\n \\newcommand{\\FOR}[2][default]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicfor\\ ##2\\ \\algorithmicdo%\n\\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@for}}\n \\newcommand{\\FORALL}[2][default]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicforall\\ ##2\\ %\n\\algorithmicdo%\n\\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@for}}\n \\newcommand{\\SHORTFORALL}[2]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicforall\\ ##1\\ %\n \\algorithmicdo\\ {##2}}\n \\newcommand{\\WHILE}[2][default]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicwhile\\ ##2\\ %\n\\algorithmicdo%\n\\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@whl}}\n \\newcommand{\\LOOP}[1][default]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicloop%\n\\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@loop}}\n%changed by alex smola\n \\newcommand{\\FUNCTION}[2][default]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicfunction\\ ##2\\ %\n \\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@func}}\n \\newcommand{\\MAIN}[2][default]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicmain\\ ##2\\ %\n \\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@main}}\n%end changed by alex smola\n \\newcommand{\\REPEAT}[1][default]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicrepeat%\n \\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@rpt}}\n \\newcommand{\\UNTIL}[1]{\\end{ALC@rpt}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicuntil\\ ##1}\n \\ifthenelse{\\boolean{ALC@noend}}{\n \\newcommand{\\ENDIF}{\\end{ALC@if}}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDFOR}{\\end{ALC@for}}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDWHILE}{\\end{ALC@whl}}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDLOOP}{\\end{ALC@loop}}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDFUNCTION}{\\end{ALC@func}}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDMAIN}{\\end{ALC@main}}\n }{\n \\newcommand{\\ENDIF}{\\end{ALC@if}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicendif}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDFOR}{\\end{ALC@for}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicendfor}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDWHILE}{\\end{ALC@whl}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicendwhile}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDLOOP}{\\end{ALC@loop}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicendloop}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDFUNCTION}{\\end{ALC@func}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicendfunction}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDMAIN}{\\end{ALC@main}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicendmain}\n } \n \\renewcommand{\\@toodeep}{}\n \\begin{list}{\\ALC@lno}{\\setcounter{ALC@line}{0}\\setcounter{ALC@rem}{0}%\n \\itemsep\\z@ \\itemindent\\z@ \\listparindent\\z@%\n \\partopsep\\z@ \\parskip\\z@ \\parsep\\z@%\n \\labelsep 0.5em \\topsep 0.2em%\n \\ifthenelse{\\equal{#1}{0}}\n {\\labelwidth 0.5em }\n {\\labelwidth 1.2em }\n \\leftmargin\\labelwidth \\addtolength{\\leftmargin}{\\labelsep}\n \\ALC@tlm\\labelsep\n }\n }\n {\\end{list}}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: fancyhdr.sty\n================================================\n%%\n%% This is file `fancyhdr.sty',\n%% generated with the docstrip utility.\n%%\n%% The original source files were:\n%%\n%% fancyhdr.dtx (with options: `fancyhdr')\n%% \n%% This is a generated file.\n%% \n%% This file may be distributed and/or modified under the conditions of\n%% the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3 of this license\n%% or (at your option) any later version. The latest version of this\n%% license is in:\n%% \n%% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt\n%% \n%% and version 1.3 or later is part of all distributions of LaTeX version\n%% 2005/12/01 or later.\n%% \n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[2018-04-01]\n\\ProvidesPackage{fancyhdr}%\n [2025/02/07 v5.2\n Extensive control of page headers and footers]%\n% Copyright (C) 1994-2025 by Pieter van Oostrum <pieter@vanoostrum.org>\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\ifdefined\\NewDocumentCommand\\else\\RequirePackage{xparse}\\fi\n\\newif\\iff@nch@check\n\\f@nch@checktrue\n\\DeclareOption{nocheck}{%\n \\f@nch@checkfalse\n}\n\\let\\f@nch@gbl\\relax\n\\newif\\iff@nch@compatViii\n\\DeclareOption{compatV3}{%\n \\PackageWarningNoLine{fancyhdr}{The `compatV3' option is deprecated.\\MessageBreak\n It will disappear in one of the following releases.\\MessageBreak\n Please change your document to work\\MessageBreak\n without this option}\n \\let\\f@nch@gbl\\global\n \\f@nch@compatViiitrue\n}\n\\newif\\iff@nch@twoside\n\\f@nch@twosidefalse\n\\DeclareOption{twoside}{%\n \\if@twoside\\else\\f@nch@twosidetrue\\fi\n}\n\\newcommand\\f@nch@def[2]{%\n \\def\\temp@a{#2}\\ifx\\temp@a\\@empty\\f@nch@gbl\\def#1{}%\n \\else\\f@nch@gbl\\def#1{#2\\strut}\\fi}\n\\DeclareOption{myheadings}{%\n \\@ifundefined{chapter}{%\n \\def\\ps@myheadings{\\ps@f@nch@fancyproto \\let\\@mkboth\\@gobbletwo\n \\fancyhf{}\n \\fancyhead[LE,RO]{\\thepage}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\slshape\\leftmark}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\slshape\\rightmark}%\n \\let\\sectionmark\\@gobble\n \\let\\subsectionmark\\@gobble\n }%\n }%\n {\\def\\ps@myheadings{\\ps@f@nch@fancyproto \\let\\@mkboth\\@gobbletwo\n \\fancyhf{}\n \\fancyhead[LE,RO]{\\thepage}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\slshape\\leftmark}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\slshape\\rightmark}%\n \\let\\chaptermark\\@gobble\n \\let\\sectionmark\\@gobble\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{headings}{%\n \\@ifundefined{chapter}{%\n \\if@twoside\n \\def\\ps@headings{\\ps@f@nch@fancyproto \\def\\@mkboth{\\protect\\markboth}\n \\fancyhf{}\n \\fancyhead[LE,RO]{\\thepage}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\slshape\\leftmark}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\slshape\\rightmark}%\n \\def\\sectionmark##1{%\n \\markboth{\\MakeUppercase{%\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\z@ \\thesection\\quad \\fi##1}}{}}%\n \\def\\subsectionmark##1{%\n \\markright{%\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\@ne \\thesubsection\\quad \\fi##1}}%\n }%\n \\else\n \\def\\ps@headings{\\ps@f@nch@fancyproto \\def\\@mkboth{\\protect\\markboth}\n \\fancyhf{}\n \\fancyhead[LE,RO]{\\thepage}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\slshape\\leftmark}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\slshape\\rightmark}%\n \\def\\sectionmark##1{%\n \\markright {\\MakeUppercase{%\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\z@ \\thesection\\quad \\fi##1}}}%\n \\let\\subsectionmark\\@gobble % Not needed but inserted for safety\n }%\n \\fi\n }{\\if@twoside\n \\def\\ps@headings{\\ps@f@nch@fancyproto \\def\\@mkboth{\\protect\\markboth}\n \\fancyhf{}\n \\fancyhead[LE,RO]{\\thepage}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\slshape\\leftmark}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\slshape\\rightmark}%\n \\def\\chaptermark##1{%\n \\markboth{\\MakeUppercase{%\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\m@ne \\if@mainmatter\n \\@chapapp\\ \\thechapter. \\ \\fi\\fi##1}}{}}%\n \\def\\sectionmark##1{%\n \\markright {\\MakeUppercase{%\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\z@ \\thesection. \\ \\fi##1}}}%\n }%\n \\else\n \\def\\ps@headings{\\ps@f@nch@fancyproto \\def\\@mkboth{\\protect\\markboth}\n \\fancyhf{}\n \\fancyhead[LE,RO]{\\thepage}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\slshape\\leftmark}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\slshape\\rightmark}%\n \\def\\chaptermark##1{%\n \\markright{\\MakeUppercase{%\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\m@ne \\if@mainmatter\n \\@chapapp\\ \\thechapter. \\ \\fi\\fi##1}}}%\n \\let\\sectionmark\\@gobble % Not needed but inserted for safety\n }%\n \\fi\n }%\n}\n\\ProcessOptions*\n\\newcommand{\\f@nch@forc}[3]{\\expandafter\\f@nchf@rc\\expandafter#1\\expandafter{#2}{#3}}\n\\newcommand{\\f@nchf@rc}[3]{\\def\\temp@ty{#2}\\ifx\\@empty\\temp@ty\\else\n \\f@nch@rc#1#2\\f@nch@rc{#3}\\fi}\n\\long\\def\\f@nch@rc#1#2#3\\f@nch@rc#4{\\def#1{#2}#4\\f@nchf@rc#1{#3}{#4}}\n\\newcommand{\\f@nch@for}[3]{\\edef\\@fortmp{#2}%\n \\expandafter\\@forloop#2,\\@nil,\\@nil\\@@#1{#3}}\n\\newcommand\\f@nch@default[3]{%\n \\edef\\temp@a{\\lowercase{\\edef\\noexpand\\temp@a{#3}}}\\temp@a \\def#1{}%\n \\f@nch@forc\\tmpf@ra{#2}%\n {\\expandafter\\f@nch@ifin\\tmpf@ra\\temp@a{\\edef#1{#1\\tmpf@ra}}{}}%\n \\ifx\\@empty#1\\def#1{#2}\\fi}\n\\newcommand{\\f@nch@ifin}[4]{%\n \\edef\\temp@a{#2}\\def\\temp@b##1#1##2\\temp@b{\\def\\temp@b{##1}}%\n \\expandafter\\temp@b#2#1\\temp@b\\ifx\\temp@a\\temp@b #4\\else #3\\fi}\n\\newcommand{\\fancyhead}[2][]{\\f@nch@fancyhf\\fancyhead h[#1]{#2}}%\n\\newcommand{\\fancyfoot}[2][]{\\f@nch@fancyhf\\fancyfoot f[#1]{#2}}%\n\\newcommand{\\fancyhf}[2][]{\\f@nch@fancyhf\\fancyhf {}[#1]{#2}}%\n\\newcommand{\\fancyheadoffset}[2][]{\\f@nch@fancyhfoffs\\fancyheadoffset h[#1]{#2}}%\n\\newcommand{\\fancyfootoffset}[2][]{\\f@nch@fancyhfoffs\\fancyfootoffset f[#1]{#2}}%\n\\newcommand{\\fancyhfoffset}[2][]{\\f@nch@fancyhfoffs\\fancyhfoffset {}[#1]{#2}}%\n\\def\\f@nch@fancyhf@Echeck#1{%\n \\if@twoside\\else\n \\iff@nch@twoside\\else\n \\if\\f@nch@@eo e%\n \\PackageWarning{fancyhdr} {\\string#1's `E' option without twoside option is useless.\\MessageBreak\n Please consider using the `twoside' option}%\n \\fi\\fi\\fi\n}\n\\long\\def\\f@nch@fancyhf#1#2[#3]#4{%\n \\def\\temp@c{}%\n \\f@nch@forc\\tmpf@ra{#3}%\n {\\expandafter\\f@nch@ifin\\tmpf@ra{eolcrhf,EOLCRHF}%\n {}{\\edef\\temp@c{\\temp@c\\tmpf@ra}}}%\n \\ifx\\@empty\\temp@c\\else \\PackageError{fancyhdr}{Illegal char `\\temp@c' in\n \\string#1 argument: [#3]}{}%\n \\fi \\f@nch@for\\temp@c{#3}%\n {\\f@nch@default\\f@nch@@eo{eo}\\temp@c\n \\f@nch@fancyhf@Echeck{#1}%\n \\f@nch@default\\f@nch@@lcr{lcr}\\temp@c\n \\f@nch@default\\f@nch@@hf{hf}{#2\\temp@c}%\n \\f@nch@forc\\f@nch@eo\\f@nch@@eo\n {\\f@nch@forc\\f@nch@lcr\\f@nch@@lcr\n {\\f@nch@forc\\f@nch@hf\\f@nch@@hf\n {\\expandafter\\f@nch@def\\csname\n f@nch@\\f@nch@eo\\f@nch@lcr\\f@nch@hf\\endcsname {#4}}}}}}\n\\def\\f@nch@fancyhfoffs#1#2[#3]#4{%\n \\def\\temp@c{}%\n \\f@nch@forc\\tmpf@ra{#3}%\n {\\expandafter\\f@nch@ifin\\tmpf@ra{eolrhf,EOLRHF}%\n {}{\\edef\\temp@c{\\temp@c\\tmpf@ra}}}%\n \\ifx\\@empty\\temp@c\\else \\PackageError{fancyhdr}{Illegal char `\\temp@c' in\n \\string#1 argument: [#3]}{}%\n \\fi \\f@nch@for\\temp@c{#3}%\n {\\f@nch@default\\f@nch@@eo{eo}\\temp@c\n \\f@nch@fancyhf@Echeck{#1}%\n \\f@nch@default\\f@nch@@lcr{lr}\\temp@c\n \\f@nch@default\\f@nch@@hf{hf}{#2\\temp@c}%\n \\f@nch@forc\\f@nch@eo\\f@nch@@eo\n {\\f@nch@forc\\f@nch@lcr\\f@nch@@lcr\n {\\f@nch@forc\\f@nch@hf\\f@nch@@hf\n {\\expandafter\\setlength\\csname\n f@nch@offset@\\f@nch@eo\\f@nch@lcr\\f@nch@hf\\endcsname {#4}}}}}%\n \\f@nch@setoffs}\n\\NewDocumentCommand {\\fancyheadwidth}{ s O{} O{} m }\n {\\f@nch@fancyhfwidth{#1}\\fancyheadwidth h[#2][#3]{#4}}%\n\\NewDocumentCommand {\\fancyfootwidth}{ s O{} O{} m }\n {\\f@nch@fancyhfwidth{#1}\\fancyfootwidth f[#2][#3]{#4}}%\n\\NewDocumentCommand {\\fancyhfwidth} { s O{} O{} m }\n {\\f@nch@fancyhfwidth{#1}\\fancyhfwidth {}[#2][#3]{#4}}%\n\\def\\f@nch@fancyhfwidth#1#2#3[#4][#5]#6{%\n \\setlength\\@tempdima{#6}%\n \\def\\temp@c{}%\n \\f@nch@forc\\tmpf@ra{#4}%\n {\\expandafter\\f@nch@ifin\\tmpf@ra{eolcrhf,EOLCRHF}%\n {}{\\edef\\temp@c{\\temp@c\\tmpf@ra}}}%\n \\ifx\\@empty\\temp@c\\else \\PackageError{fancyhdr}{Illegal char `\\temp@c' in\n \\string#2 argument: [#4]}{}%\n \\fi\n \\f@nch@for\\temp@c{#4}%\n {\\f@nch@default\\f@nch@@eo{eo}\\temp@c\n \\f@nch@fancyhf@Echeck{#2}%\n \\f@nch@default\\f@nch@@lcr{lcr}\\temp@c\n \\f@nch@default\\f@nch@@hf{hf}{#3\\temp@c}%\n \\f@nch@forc\\f@nch@eo\\f@nch@@eo\n {\\f@nch@forc\\f@nch@lcr\\f@nch@@lcr\n {\\f@nch@forc\\f@nch@hf\\f@nch@@hf\n {%\n \\IfBooleanTF{#1}{%\n \\expandafter\\edef\\csname\n f@nch@width@\\f@nch@eo\\f@nch@lcr\\f@nch@hf\\endcsname{\\the\\@tempdima}%\n }%\n {%\n \\expandafter\\def\\csname\n f@nch@width@\\f@nch@eo\\f@nch@lcr\\f@nch@hf\\endcsname{#6}%\n }%\n \\csname f@nchdrwdt@align@v@\\f@nch@hf\\endcsname\n \\edef\\f@nch@align@@h{\\f@nch@lcr}%\n \\def\\temp@a{#5}%\n \\ifx\\temp@a\\@empty \\else \\f@nchdrwdt@align#5\\@nil{#2}\\fi\n \\expandafter\\edef\\csname\n f@nch@align@\\f@nch@eo\\f@nch@lcr\\f@nch@hf\\endcsname\n {\\f@nch@align@@v\\f@nch@align@@h}}}}}}\n\\def\\f@nch@width@elh{\\headwidth}\n\\def\\f@nch@width@ech{\\headwidth}\n\\def\\f@nch@width@erh{\\headwidth}\n\\def\\f@nch@width@olh{\\headwidth}\n\\def\\f@nch@width@och{\\headwidth}\n\\def\\f@nch@width@orh{\\headwidth}\n\\def\\f@nch@width@elf{\\headwidth}\n\\def\\f@nch@width@ecf{\\headwidth}\n\\def\\f@nch@width@erf{\\headwidth}\n\\def\\f@nch@width@olf{\\headwidth}\n\\def\\f@nch@width@ocf{\\headwidth}\n\\def\\f@nch@width@orf{\\headwidth}\n\\def\\f@nch@align@elh{bl}\n\\def\\f@nch@align@ech{bc}\n\\def\\f@nch@align@erh{br}\n\\def\\f@nch@align@olh{bl}\n\\def\\f@nch@align@och{bc}\n\\def\\f@nch@align@orh{br}\n\\def\\f@nch@align@elf{tl}\n\\def\\f@nch@align@ecf{tc}\n\\def\\f@nch@align@erf{tr}\n\\def\\f@nch@align@olf{tl}\n\\def\\f@nch@align@ocf{tc}\n\\def\\f@nch@align@orf{tr}\n\\def\\f@nchdrwdt@align@v@h{\\def\\f@nch@align@@v{b}}%\n\\def\\f@nchdrwdt@align@v@f{\\def\\f@nch@align@@v{t}}%\n\\long\\def\\f@nchdrwdt@align#1#2\\@nil#3{%\n \\f@nch@ifin{#1}{TtcbB-}{%\n \\f@nch@ifin{#1}{-}{}{\\def\\f@nch@align@@v{#1}}%\n \\def\\@tempa{#2}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty \\else \\def\\f@nch@align@@h{#2}\\fi\n }%\n {\\def\\f@nch@align@@h{#1}}%\n \\expandafter\\f@nch@ifin\\expandafter{\\f@nch@align@@h}{lcrj}{}%\n {\\PackageError{fancyhdr}\n {\\string#3: Illegal char `\\f@nch@align@@h'\\MessageBreak\n in alignment argument}{}}%\n}\n\\newcommand{\\lhead}[2][\\f@nch@olh]%\n {\\f@nch@def\\f@nch@olh{#2}\\f@nch@def\\f@nch@elh{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\chead}[2][\\f@nch@och]%\n {\\f@nch@def\\f@nch@och{#2}\\f@nch@def\\f@nch@ech{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\rhead}[2][\\f@nch@orh]%\n {\\f@nch@def\\f@nch@orh{#2}\\f@nch@def\\f@nch@erh{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\lfoot}[2][\\f@nch@olf]%\n {\\f@nch@def\\f@nch@olf{#2}\\f@nch@def\\f@nch@elf{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\cfoot}[2][\\f@nch@ocf]%\n {\\f@nch@def\\f@nch@ocf{#2}\\f@nch@def\\f@nch@ecf{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\rfoot}[2][\\f@nch@orf]%\n {\\f@nch@def\\f@nch@orf{#2}\\f@nch@def\\f@nch@erf{#1}}\n\\newlength{\\f@nch@headwidth} \\let\\headwidth\\f@nch@headwidth\n\\newlength{\\f@nch@offset@elh}\n\\newlength{\\f@nch@offset@erh}\n\\newlength{\\f@nch@offset@olh}\n\\newlength{\\f@nch@offset@orh}\n\\newlength{\\f@nch@offset@elf}\n\\newlength{\\f@nch@offset@erf}\n\\newlength{\\f@nch@offset@olf}\n\\newlength{\\f@nch@offset@orf}\n\\newcommand{\\headrulewidth}{0.4pt}\n\\newcommand{\\footrulewidth}{0pt}\n\\@ifundefined{headruleskip}%\n {\\newcommand{\\headruleskip}{0pt}}{}\n\\@ifundefined{footruleskip}%\n {\\newcommand{\\footruleskip}{.3\\normalbaselineskip}}{}\n\\newcommand{\\plainheadrulewidth}{0pt}\n\\newcommand{\\plainfootrulewidth}{0pt}\n\\newif\\if@fancyplain \\@fancyplainfalse\n\\def\\fancyplain#1#2{\\if@fancyplain#1\\else#2\\fi}\n\\headwidth=-123456789sp\n\\let\\f@nch@raggedleft\\raggedleft\n\\let\\f@nch@raggedright\\raggedright\n\\let\\f@nch@centering\\centering\n\\let\\f@nch@everypar\\everypar\n\\ifdefined\\ExplSyntaxOn\n \\ExplSyntaxOn\n \\providecommand\\IfFormatAtLeastTF{\\@ifl@t@r\\fmtversion}\n \\IfFormatAtLeastTF{2021-06-01}{\n \\def\\f@nch@saveclr@parhook #1{\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname f@nch@__hook~#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\n \\csname __hook~#1\\endcsname\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname f@nch@__hook_toplevel~#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\n \\csname __hook_toplevel~#1\\endcsname\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname f@nch@__hook_next~#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\n \\csname __hook_next~#1\\endcsname\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname f@nch@g__hook_#1_code_prop\\expandafter\\endcsname\n \\csname g__hook_#1_code_prop\\endcsname\n \\RemoveFromHook{#1}[*]\n \\ClearHookNext{#1}\n }\n \\def\\f@nch@restore@parhook #1{\n \\global\\expandafter\\let\\csname __hook~#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\n \\csname f@nch@__hook~#1\\endcsname\n \\global\\expandafter\\let\\csname __hook_toplevel~#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\n \\csname f@nch@__hook_toplevel~#1\\endcsname\n \\global\\expandafter\\let\\csname __hook_next~#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\n \\csname f@nch@__hook_next~#1\\endcsname\n \\global\\expandafter\\let\\csname g__hook_#1_code_prop\\expandafter\\endcsname\n \\csname f@nch@g__hook_#1_code_prop\\endcsname\n }\n \\def\\f@nch@resetpar{\n \\f@nch@everypar{}\n \\f@nch@saveclr@parhook{para/before}\n \\f@nch@saveclr@parhook{para/begin}\n \\f@nch@saveclr@parhook{para/end}\n \\f@nch@saveclr@parhook{para/after}\n }\n \\def\\f@nch@restorepar{\n \\f@nch@restore@parhook{para/before}\n \\f@nch@restore@parhook{para/begin}\n \\f@nch@restore@parhook{para/end}\n \\f@nch@restore@parhook{para/after}\n }\n }{\n \\def\\f@nch@resetpar{\n \\f@nch@everypar{}\n }\n \\def\\f@nch@restorepar{}\n }\n \\ExplSyntaxOff\n\\else\n \\def\\f@nch@resetpar{%\n \\f@nch@everypar{}%\n }\n \\def\\f@nch@restorepar{}\n\\fi\n\\newcommand\\f@nch@noUppercase[2][]{#2}\n\\def\\f@nch@reset{\\f@nch@resetpar\\restorecr\\endlinechar=13\n \\catcode`\\\\=0\\catcode`\\{=1\\catcode`\\}=2\\catcode`\\$=3\\catcode`\\&=4\n \\catcode`\\#=6\\catcode`\\^=7\\catcode`\\_=8\\catcode`\\ =10\\catcode`\\@=11\n \\catcode`\\:=11\\catcode`\\~=13\\catcode`\\%=14\n \\catcode0=15 %NULL\n \\catcode9=10 %TAB\n \\let\\\\\\@normalcr \\let\\raggedleft\\f@nch@raggedleft\n \\let\\raggedright\\f@nch@raggedright \\let\\centering\\f@nch@centering\n \\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n \\hsize=\\headwidth\n \\def\\nouppercase##1{{%\n \\let\\uppercase\\relax\\let\\MakeUppercase\\f@nch@noUppercase\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname MakeUppercase \\endcsname\\relax\n \\expandafter\\def\\csname MakeUppercase\\space\\space\\space\\endcsname\n [####1]####2{####2}%\n ##1}}%\n \\@ifundefined{@normalsize} {\\normalsize} % for ucthesis.cls\n {\\@normalsize}%\n }\n\\newcommand*{\\fancycenter}[1][1em]{%\n \\@ifnextchar[{\\f@nch@center{#1}}{\\f@nch@center{#1}[3]}%\n}\n\\def\\f@nch@center#1[#2]#3#4#5{%\n \\def\\@tempa{#4}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty\n \\hbox to\\linewidth{\\color@begingroup{#3}\\hfil {#5}\\color@endgroup}%\n \\else\n \\setlength\\@tempdima{#1}%\n \\setlength{\\@tempdimb}{#2\\@tempdima}%\n \\@tempdimc \\@tempdimb \\advance\\@tempdimc -\\@tempdima\n \\setlength\\@tempskipa{\\@tempdimb \\@plus 1fil \\@minus \\@tempdimc}%\n \\@tempskipb\\@tempskipa\n \\def\\@tempa{#3}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty\n \\addtolength\\@tempskipa{\\z@ \\@minus \\@tempdima}%\n \\fi\n \\def\\@tempa{#5}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty % empty right\n \\addtolength\\@tempskipb{\\z@ \\@minus \\@tempdima}%\n \\fi\n \\settowidth{\\@tempdimb}{#3}%\n \\settowidth{\\@tempdimc}{#5}%\n \\ifdim\\@tempdimb>\\@tempdimc\n \\advance\\@tempdimb -\\@tempdimc\n \\addtolength\\@tempskipb{\\@tempdimb \\@minus \\@tempdimb}%\n \\else\n \\advance\\@tempdimc -\\@tempdimb\n \\addtolength\\@tempskipa{\\@tempdimc \\@minus \\@tempdimc}%\n \\fi\n \\hbox to\\linewidth{\\color@begingroup{#3}\\hskip \\@tempskipa\n {#4}\\hskip \\@tempskipb {#5}\\color@endgroup}%\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand{\\f@nch@headinit}{}\n\\newcommand{\\fancyheadinit}[1]{%\n \\def\\f@nch@headinit{#1}%\n}\n\\newcommand{\\f@nch@footinit}{}\n\\newcommand{\\fancyfootinit}[1]{%\n \\def\\f@nch@footinit{#1}%\n}\n\\newcommand{\\fancyhfinit}[1]{%\n \\def\\f@nch@headinit{#1}%\n \\def\\f@nch@footinit{#1}%\n}\n\\ifdefined\\NewMirroredHookPair\n \\NewMirroredHookPair{fancyhdr/before}{fancyhdr/after}\n \\NewMirroredHookPair{fancyhdr/head/begin}{fancyhdr/head/end}\n \\NewMirroredHookPair{fancyhdr/foot/begin}{fancyhdr/foot/end}\n\\fi\n\\newlength\\f@nch@height\n\\newlength\\f@nch@footalignment\n\\newif\\iff@nch@footalign\\f@nch@footalignfalse\n\\newcommand{\\fancyfootalign}[1]{%\n \\def\\temp@a{#1}%\n \\ifx\\temp@a\\@empty\n \\f@nch@footalignfalse\n \\else\n \\f@nch@footaligntrue\n \\setlength\\f@nch@footalignment{#1}%\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand\\fancyhdrsettoheight[2]{%\n \\expandafter\\ifx\\csname f@nch@#2\\endcsname\\fancyhdrsettoheight\n \\else\\PackageError{fancyhdr}{Unknown parameter #2 in \\string\\fancyhdrsettoheight}{}\\fi\n \\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{{\\f@nch@checkfalse\\csname @#2\\endcsname}}%\n \\setlength{#1}\\f@nch@height\n \\setbox\\@tempboxa\\box\\voidb@x\n}\n\\let\\f@nch@oddhead\\fancyhdrsettoheight\n\\let\\f@nch@evenhead\\fancyhdrsettoheight\n\\let\\f@nch@oddfoot\\fancyhdrsettoheight\n\\let\\f@nch@evenfoot\\fancyhdrsettoheight\n\\newcommand\\f@nch@vbox[2]{%\n \\setbox0\\vbox{#2}%\n \\global\\f@nch@height=\\ht0\n \\ifdim\\ht0>#1\\relax\n \\iff@nch@check\n \\dimen0=#1\\advance\\dimen0-\\ht0\n \\PackageWarning{fancyhdr}{%\n \\string#1 is too small (\\the#1): \\MessageBreak\n Make it at least \\the\\ht0, for example:\\MessageBreak\n \\string\\setlength{\\string#1}{\\the\\ht0}%\n \\iff@nch@compatViii .\\MessageBreak\n We now make it that large for the rest of the document.\\MessageBreak\n This may cause the page layout to be inconsistent, however\n \\fi\n \\ifx#1\\headheight .\\MessageBreak\n You might also make \\topmargin smaller:\\MessageBreak\n \\string\\addtolength{\\string\\topmargin}{\\the\\dimen0}%\n \\fi\n \\@gobble\n }%\n \\iff@nch@compatViii\n \\dimen0=#1\\relax\n \\global#1=\\ht0\\relax\n \\ht0=\\dimen0 %\n \\else\n \\ht0=#1\\relax\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\ht0=#1\\relax\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\box0}\n\\newcommand\\f@nch@head[6]{%\n \\f@nch@reset\n \\ifdefined\\UseHook\\UseHook{fancyhdr/before}\\UseHook{fancyhdr/head/begin}\\fi\n \\f@nch@headinit\\relax\n #1%\n \\hbox to\\headwidth{%\n \\f@nch@vbox\\headheight{%\n \\f@nch@hfbox{#2}{#3}{#4}{#6}{h}%\n \\vskip\\headruleskip\\relax\n \\headrule\n }%\n }%\n #5%\n \\ifdefined\\UseHook\\UseHook{fancyhdr/head/end}\\UseHook{fancyhdr/after}\\fi\n \\f@nch@restorepar\n}\n\\newcommand\\f@nch@foot[6]{%\n \\f@nch@reset\n \\ifdefined\\UseHook\\UseHook{fancyhdr/before}\\UseHook{fancyhdr/foot/begin}\\fi\n \\f@nch@footinit\\relax\n #1%\n \\hbox to\\headwidth{%\n \\f@nch@vbox\\footskip{%\n \\setbox0=\\vbox{\\footrule}\\unvbox0\n \\vskip\\footruleskip\n \\f@nch@hfbox{#2}{#3}{#4}{#6}{f}%\n \\iff@nch@footalign \\vskip\\f@nch@footalignment \\fi\n }%\n }%\n #5%\n \\ifdefined\\UseHook\\UseHook{fancyhdr/foot/end}\\UseHook{fancyhdr/after}\\fi\n \\f@nch@restorepar\n}\n\\newlength\\f@nch@widthL\n\\newlength\\f@nch@widthC\n\\newlength\\f@nch@widthR\n\\newcommand\\f@nch@hfbox[5]{%\n \\setlength\\f@nch@widthL{\\csname f@nch@width@#4l#5\\endcsname}%\n \\setlength\\f@nch@widthC{\\csname f@nch@width@#4c#5\\endcsname}%\n \\setlength\\f@nch@widthR{\\csname f@nch@width@#4r#5\\endcsname}%\n \\let\\@tempa\\f@nch@hfbox@center\n \\ifdim \\dimexpr \\f@nch@widthL+\\f@nch@widthC+\\f@nch@widthR>\\headwidth\n \\else\n \\ifdim \\dimexpr \\f@nch@widthL+0.5\\f@nch@widthC>0.5\\headwidth\n \\let \\@tempa\\f@nch@hfbox@fit\n \\fi\n \\ifdim \\dimexpr \\f@nch@widthR+0.5\\f@nch@widthC>0.5\\headwidth\n \\let \\@tempa\\f@nch@hfbox@fit\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\@tempa{#1}{#2}{#3}#4#5%\n}\n\\newcommand\\f@nch@hfbox@center[5]{%\n \\hbox to \\headwidth{%\n \\rlap{\\f@nch@parbox{#1}\\f@nch@widthL{#4}l{#5}}%\n \\hfill\n \\f@nch@parbox{#2}\\f@nch@widthC{#4}c{#5}%\n \\hfill\n \\llap{\\f@nch@parbox{#3}\\f@nch@widthR{#4}r{#5}}%\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand\\f@nch@hfbox@fit[5]{%\n \\hbox to \\headwidth{%\n \\f@nch@parbox{#1}\\f@nch@widthL{#4}l{#5}%\n \\hfill\n \\f@nch@parbox{#2}\\f@nch@widthC{#4}c{#5}%\n \\hfill\n \\f@nch@parbox{#3}\\f@nch@widthR{#4}r{#5}%\n }%\n}%\n\\newcommand\\f@nch@parbox[5]{%\n \\expandafter\\expandafter\\expandafter\\f@nch@parbox@align\n \\csname f@nch@align@#3#4#5\\endcsname\n \\parbox[\\f@nch@align@@v]{#2}%\n {%\n \\f@nch@align@@pre\n \\f@nch@align@@h\\leavevmode\\ignorespaces#1%\n \\f@nch@align@@post\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand\\f@nch@parbox@align[2]{%\n \\def\\f@nch@align@@pre{}%\n \\def\\f@nch@align@@post{}%\n \\csname f@nch@parbox@align@v#1\\endcsname\n \\csname f@nch@parbox@align@h#2\\endcsname\n}\n\\def\\f@nch@parbox@align@vT{\\def\\f@nch@align@@v{t}\\def\\f@nch@align@@pre{\\vspace{0pt}}}\n\\def\\f@nch@parbox@align@vt{\\def\\f@nch@align@@v{t}}\n\\def\\f@nch@parbox@align@vc{\\def\\f@nch@align@@v{c}}\n\\def\\f@nch@parbox@align@vb{\\def\\f@nch@align@@v{b}}\n\\def\\f@nch@parbox@align@vB{\\def\\f@nch@align@@v{b}\\def\\f@nch@align@@post{\\vspace{0pt}}}\n\\def\\f@nch@parbox@align@hl{\\def\\f@nch@align@@h{\\raggedright}}\n\\def\\f@nch@parbox@align@hc{\\def\\f@nch@align@@h{\\centering}}\n\\def\\f@nch@parbox@align@hr{\\def\\f@nch@align@@h{\\raggedleft}}\n\\def\\f@nch@parbox@align@hj{\\def\\f@nch@align@@h{}}\n\\@ifundefined{@chapapp}{\\let\\@chapapp\\chaptername}{}%\n\\def\\f@nch@initialise{%\n \\@ifundefined{chapter}%\n {\\def\\sectionmark##1{\\markboth{\\MakeUppercase{\\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth>\\z@\n \\thesection\\hskip 1em\\relax\n \\fi ##1}}{}}%\n \\def\\subsectionmark##1{\\markright {\\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\@ne\n \\thesubsection\\hskip 1em\\relax \\fi ##1}}}%\n {\\def\\chaptermark##1{\\markboth {\\MakeUppercase{\\ifnum\n \\c@secnumdepth>\\m@ne \\@chapapp\\ \\thechapter. \\ \\fi ##1}}{}}%\n \\def\\sectionmark##1{\\markright{\\MakeUppercase{\\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\z@\n \\thesection. \\ \\fi ##1}}}%\n }%\n \\def\\headrule{{\\if@fancyplain\\let\\headrulewidth\\plainheadrulewidth\\fi\n \\hrule\\@height\\headrulewidth\\@width\\headwidth\n \\vskip-\\headrulewidth}}%\n \\def\\footrule{{\\if@fancyplain\\let\\footrulewidth\\plainfootrulewidth\\fi\n \\hrule\\@width\\headwidth\\@height\\footrulewidth}}%\n \\def\\headrulewidth{0.4pt}%\n \\def\\footrulewidth{0pt}%\n \\def\\headruleskip{0pt}%\n \\def\\footruleskip{0.3\\normalbaselineskip}%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\if@twoside\n \\fancyhead[el,or]{\\fancyplain{}{\\slshape\\rightmark}}%\n \\fancyhead[er,ol]{\\fancyplain{}{\\slshape\\leftmark}}%\n \\else\n \\fancyhead[l]{\\fancyplain{}{\\slshape\\rightmark}}%\n \\fancyhead[r]{\\fancyplain{}{\\slshape\\leftmark}}%\n \\fi\n \\fancyfoot[c]{\\rmfamily\\thepage}% page number\n}\n\\f@nch@initialise\n\\def\\ps@f@nch@fancyproto{%\n \\ifdim\\headwidth<0sp\n \\global\\advance\\headwidth123456789sp\\global\\advance\\headwidth\\textwidth\n \\fi\n \\gdef\\ps@f@nch@fancyproto{\\@fancyplainfalse\\ps@f@nch@fancycore}%\n \\@fancyplainfalse\\ps@f@nch@fancycore\n}%\n\\@namedef{f@nch@ps@f@nch@fancyproto-is-fancyhdr}{}\n\\def\\ps@fancy{\\ps@f@nch@fancyproto}\n\\@namedef{f@nch@ps@fancy-is-fancyhdr}{}\n\\def\\ps@fancyplain{\\ps@f@nch@fancyproto \\let\\ps@plain\\ps@plain@fancy}\n\\def\\ps@plain@fancy{\\@fancyplaintrue\\ps@f@nch@fancycore}\n\\let\\f@nch@ps@empty\\ps@empty\n\\def\\ps@f@nch@fancycore{%\n \\f@nch@ps@empty\n \\def\\@mkboth{\\protect\\markboth}%\n \\def\\f@nch@oddhead{\\f@nch@head\\f@nch@Oolh\\f@nch@olh\\f@nch@och\\f@nch@orh\\f@nch@Oorh{o}}%\n \\def\\@oddhead{%\n \\iff@nch@twoside\n \\ifodd\\c@page\n \\f@nch@oddhead\n \\else\n \\@evenhead\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\f@nch@oddhead\n \\fi\n }\n \\def\\f@nch@oddfoot{\\f@nch@foot\\f@nch@Oolf\\f@nch@olf\\f@nch@ocf\\f@nch@orf\\f@nch@Oorf{o}}%\n \\def\\@oddfoot{%\n \\iff@nch@twoside\n \\ifodd\\c@page\n \\f@nch@oddfoot\n \\else\n \\@evenfoot\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\f@nch@oddfoot\n \\fi\n }\n \\def\\@evenhead{\\f@nch@head\\f@nch@Oelh\\f@nch@elh\\f@nch@ech\\f@nch@erh\\f@nch@Oerh{e}}%\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\f@nch@foot\\f@nch@Oelf\\f@nch@elf\\f@nch@ecf\\f@nch@erf\\f@nch@Oerf{e}}%\n}\n\\def\\f@nch@Oolh{\\if@reversemargin\\hss\\else\\relax\\fi}\n\\def\\f@nch@Oorh{\\if@reversemargin\\relax\\else\\hss\\fi}\n\\let\\f@nch@Oelh\\f@nch@Oorh\n\\let\\f@nch@Oerh\\f@nch@Oolh\n\\let\\f@nch@Oolf\\f@nch@Oolh\n\\let\\f@nch@Oorf\\f@nch@Oorh\n\\let\\f@nch@Oelf\\f@nch@Oelh\n\\let\\f@nch@Oerf\\f@nch@Oerh\n\\def\\f@nch@offsolh{\\headwidth=\\textwidth\\advance\\headwidth\\f@nch@offset@olh\n \\advance\\headwidth\\f@nch@offset@orh\\hskip-\\f@nch@offset@olh}\n\\def\\f@nch@offselh{\\headwidth=\\textwidth\\advance\\headwidth\\f@nch@offset@elh\n \\advance\\headwidth\\f@nch@offset@erh\\hskip-\\f@nch@offset@elh}\n\\def\\f@nch@offsolf{\\headwidth=\\textwidth\\advance\\headwidth\\f@nch@offset@olf\n \\advance\\headwidth\\f@nch@offset@orf\\hskip-\\f@nch@offset@olf}\n\\def\\f@nch@offself{\\headwidth=\\textwidth\\advance\\headwidth\\f@nch@offset@elf\n \\advance\\headwidth\\f@nch@offset@erf\\hskip-\\f@nch@offset@elf}\n\\def\\f@nch@setoffs{%\n \\f@nch@gbl\\let\\headwidth\\f@nch@headwidth\n \\f@nch@gbl\\def\\f@nch@Oolh{\\f@nch@offsolh}%\n \\f@nch@gbl\\def\\f@nch@Oelh{\\f@nch@offselh}%\n \\f@nch@gbl\\def\\f@nch@Oorh{\\hss}%\n \\f@nch@gbl\\def\\f@nch@Oerh{\\hss}%\n \\f@nch@gbl\\def\\f@nch@Oolf{\\f@nch@offsolf}%\n \\f@nch@gbl\\def\\f@nch@Oelf{\\f@nch@offself}%\n \\f@nch@gbl\\def\\f@nch@Oorf{\\hss}%\n \\f@nch@gbl\\def\\f@nch@Oerf{\\hss}%\n}\n\\newif\\iff@nch@footnote\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\let\\latex@makecol\\@makecol\n \\def\\@makecol{\\ifvoid\\footins\\f@nch@footnotefalse\\else\\f@nch@footnotetrue\\fi\n \\let\\f@nch@topfloat\\@toplist\\let\\f@nch@botfloat\\@botlist\\latex@makecol}%\n}\n\\newcommand\\iftopfloat[2]{\\ifx\\f@nch@topfloat\\@empty #2\\else #1\\fi}%\n\\newcommand\\ifbotfloat[2]{\\ifx\\f@nch@botfloat\\@empty #2\\else #1\\fi}%\n\\newcommand\\iffloatpage[2]{\\if@fcolmade #1\\else #2\\fi}%\n\\newcommand\\iffootnote[2]{\\iff@nch@footnote #1\\else #2\\fi}%\n\\ifx\\@temptokenb\\undefined \\csname newtoks\\endcsname\\@temptokenb\\fi\n\\newif\\iff@nch@pagestyle@star\n\\newcommand\\fancypagestyle{%\n \\@ifstar{\\f@nch@pagestyle@startrue\\f@nch@pagestyle}%\n {\\f@nch@pagestyle@starfalse\\f@nch@pagestyle}%\n}\n\\newcommand\\f@nch@pagestyle[1]{%\n \\@ifnextchar[{\\f@nch@@pagestyle{#1}}{\\f@nch@@pagestyle{#1}[f@nch@fancyproto]}%\n}\n\\long\\def\\f@nch@@pagestyle#1[#2]#3{%\n \\@ifundefined{ps@#2}{%\n \\PackageError{fancyhdr}{\\string\\fancypagestyle: Unknown base page style `#2'}{}%\n }{%\n \\@ifundefined{f@nch@ps@#2-is-fancyhdr}{%\n \\PackageError{fancyhdr}{\\string\\fancypagestyle: Base page style `#2' is not fancyhdr-based}{}%\n }%\n {%\n \\f@nch@pagestyle@setup\n \\def\\temp@b{\\@namedef{ps@#1}}%\n \\expandafter\\temp@b\\expandafter{\\the\\@temptokenb\n \\let\\f@nch@gbl\\relax\\@nameuse{ps@#2}#3\\relax}%\n \\@namedef{f@nch@ps@#1-is-fancyhdr}{}%\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand\\f@nch@pagestyle@setup{%\n \\iff@nch@pagestyle@star\n \\iff@nch@check\\@temptokenb={\\f@nch@checktrue}\\else\\@temptokenb={\\f@nch@checkfalse}\\fi\n \\@tfor\\temp@a:=\n \\f@nch@olh\\f@nch@och\\f@nch@orh\\f@nch@elh\\f@nch@ech\\f@nch@erh\n \\f@nch@olf\\f@nch@ocf\\f@nch@orf\\f@nch@elf\\f@nch@ecf\\f@nch@erf\n \\f@nch@width@elh\\f@nch@width@ech\\f@nch@width@erh\\f@nch@width@olh\n \\f@nch@width@och\\f@nch@width@orh\\f@nch@width@elf\\f@nch@width@ecf\n \\f@nch@width@erf\\f@nch@width@olf\\f@nch@width@ocf\\f@nch@width@orf\n \\f@nch@align@elh\\f@nch@align@ech\\f@nch@align@erh\\f@nch@align@olh\n \\f@nch@align@och\\f@nch@align@orh\\f@nch@align@elf\\f@nch@align@ecf\n \\f@nch@align@erf\\f@nch@align@olf\\f@nch@align@ocf\\f@nch@align@orf\n \\f@nch@Oolh\\f@nch@Oorh\\f@nch@Oelh\\f@nch@Oerh\n \\f@nch@Oolf\\f@nch@Oorf\\f@nch@Oelf\\f@nch@Oerf\n \\f@nch@headinit\\f@nch@footinit\n \\headrule\\headrulewidth\\footrule\\footrulewidth\n \\do {%\n \\toks@=\\expandafter\\expandafter\\expandafter{\\temp@a}%\n \\toks@=\\expandafter\\expandafter\\expandafter{%\n \\expandafter\\expandafter\\expandafter\\def\n \\expandafter\\expandafter\\temp@a\\expandafter{\\the\\toks@}}%\n \\edef\\temp@b{\\@temptokenb={\\the\\@temptokenb\\the\\toks@}}%\n \\temp@b\n }%\n \\@tfor\\temp@a:=\n \\f@nch@offset@olh\\f@nch@offset@orh\\f@nch@offset@elh\\f@nch@offset@erh\n \\f@nch@offset@olf\\f@nch@offset@orf\\f@nch@offset@elf\\f@nch@offset@erf\n \\do {%\n \\toks@=\\expandafter\\expandafter\\expandafter{\\expandafter\\the\\temp@a}%\n \\toks@=\\expandafter\\expandafter\\expandafter{%\n \\expandafter\\expandafter\\expandafter\\setlength\n \\expandafter\\expandafter\\temp@a\\expandafter{\\the\\toks@}}%\n \\edef\\temp@b{\\@temptokenb={\\the\\@temptokenb\\the\\toks@}}%\n \\temp@b\n }%\n \\else\n \\@temptokenb={}%\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand\\fancypagestyleassign[2]{%\n \\@ifundefined{ps@#2}{%\n \\PackageError{fancyhdr}{\\string\\fancypagestyleassign: Unknown page style `#2'}{}%\n }{%\n \\expandafter\\let\n \\csname ps@#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\n \\csname ps@#2\\endcsname\n \\@ifundefined{f@nch@ps@#2-is-fancyhdr}{%\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname f@nch@ps@#1-is-fancyhdr\\endcsname\\@undefined\n }{%\n \\@namedef{f@nch@ps@#1-is-fancyhdr}{}%\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\fancypagestyle*{fancydefault}{\\f@nch@initialise}\n\\def\\f@nchdrbox@topstrut{\\vrule height\\ht\\strutbox width\\z@}\n\\def\\f@nchdrbox@botstrut{\\vrule depth\\dp\\strutbox width\\z@}\n\\def\\f@nchdrbox@nostrut{\\noalign{\\vspace{0pt}}\\let\\f@nchdrbox@@crstrut\\f@nchdrbox@botstrut}\n\\NewDocumentCommand{\\fancyhdrbox}{ O{cl} o m }{%\n\\begingroup\n \\let\\f@nchdrbox@@pre\\f@nchdrbox@topstrut\n \\let\\f@nchdrbox@@postx\\f@nchdrbox@botstrut\n \\let\\f@nchdrbox@@posty\\relax\n \\let\\f@nchdrbox@@crstrut\\strut\n \\IfNoValueTF{#2}%\n {\\let\\f@nchdrbox@@halignto\\@empty}%\n {\\setlength\\@tempdima{#2}%\n \\def\\f@nchdrbox@@halignto{to\\@tempdima}}%\n \\def\\@tempa{#1}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty\n \\f@nchdrbox@align cl\\@nil{#3}%\n \\else\n \\f@nchdrbox@align #1\\@nil{#3}%\n \\fi\n\\endgroup\n}\n\\protected\\def\\f@nchdrbox@cr{%\n {\\ifnum0=`}\\fi\\@ifstar\\@f@nchdrbox@xcr\\@f@nchdrbox@xcr}\n\n\\def\\@f@nchdrbox@xcr{%\n \\unskip\\f@nchdrbox@@crstrut\n \\@ifnextchar[\\@f@nchdrbox@argc{\\ifnum0=`{\\fi}\\cr}%\n}\n\n\\def\\@f@nchdrbox@argc[#1]{%\n \\ifnum0=`{\\fi}%\n \\ifdim #1>\\z@\n \\unskip\\@f@nchdrbox@xargc{#1}%\n \\else\n \\@f@nchdrbox@yargc{#1}%\n \\fi}\n\n\\def\\@f@nchdrbox@xargc#1{\\@tempdima #1\\advance\\@tempdima \\dp \\strutbox\n \\vrule \\@height\\z@ \\@depth\\@tempdima \\@width\\z@ \\cr}\n\n\\def\\@f@nchdrbox@yargc#1{\\cr\\noalign{\\setlength\\@tempdima{#1}\\vskip\\@tempdima}}\n\\def\\f@nchdrbox@T{\\let\\f@nchdrbox@@pre\\f@nchdrbox@nostrut\n \\f@nchdrbox@t}\n\\def\\f@nchdrbox@t{\\def\\f@nchdrbox@@v{t}\\def\\f@nchdrbox@@h{l}}\n\\def\\f@nchdrbox@c{\\def\\f@nchdrbox@@v{c}\\def\\f@nchdrbox@@h{c}}\n\\def\\f@nchdrbox@b{\\def\\f@nchdrbox@@v{b}\\def\\f@nchdrbox@@h{l}}\n\\def\\f@nchdrbox@B{\\let\\f@nchdrbox@@postx\\relax\n \\def\\f@nchdrbox@@posty{\\vspace{0pt}}%\n \\f@nchdrbox@b}\n\\long\\def\\f@nchdrbox@align#1#2\\@nil#3{%\n \\f@nch@ifin{#1}{TtcbB}{%\n \\@nameuse{f@nchdrbox@#1}%\n \\def\\@tempa{#2}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty\\else \\def\\f@nchdrbox@@h{#2}\\fi\n }%\n {\\def\\f@nchdrbox@@v{c}\\def\\f@nchdrbox@@h{#1}}%\n \\expandafter\\f@nch@ifin\\expandafter{\\f@nchdrbox@@h}{lcr}{}%\n {\\PackageError{fancyhdr}{\\string\\fancyhdrbox: Illegal char `\\f@nchdrbox@@h'\\MessageBreak\n in alignment argument}{}}%\n \\let\\\\\\f@nchdrbox@cr\n \\setbox0=\\if \\f@nchdrbox@@v t\\vtop\n \\else \\vbox\n \\fi\n {%\n \\ialign \\f@nchdrbox@@halignto\n \\bgroup \\relax\n {\\if \\f@nchdrbox@@h l\\hskip 1sp\\else \\hfil \\fi\n \\ignorespaces ##\\unskip\n \\if\\f@nchdrbox@@h r\\else \\hfil \\fi\n }%\n \\tabskip\\z@skip \\cr\n \\f@nchdrbox@@pre\n #3\\unskip \\f@nchdrbox@@postx\n \\crcr\n \\egroup\n \\f@nchdrbox@@posty\n }%\n \\if\\f@nchdrbox@@v c\\@tempdima=\\ht0\\advance\\@tempdima\\dp0%\n \\ht0=0.5\\@tempdima\\dp0=0.5\\@tempdima\\fi\n \\leavevmode \\box0\n}\n\\@ifclassloaded{newlfm}\n{\n \\let\\ps@@empty\\f@nch@ps@empty\n \\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\renewcommand{\\@zfancyhead}[5]{\\relax\\hbox to\\headwidth{\\f@nch@reset\n \\@zfancyvbox\\headheight{\\hbox\n {\\rlap{\\parbox[b]{\\headwidth}{\\raggedright\\f@nch@olh}}\\hfill\n \\parbox[b]{\\headwidth}{\\centering\\f@nch@olh}\\hfill\n \\llap{\\parbox[b]{\\headwidth}{\\raggedleft\\f@nch@orh}}}%\n \\zheadrule}}\\relax}%\n }\n}\n{}\n\\endinput\n%%\n%% End of file `fancyhdr.sty'.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: icml2.tex\n================================================\n%%%%%%%% ICML 2026 EXAMPLE LATEX SUBMISSION FILE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\pdfminorversion=4\n\\pdfobjcompresslevel=0\n\n\\documentclass{article}\n\n% Recommended, but optional, packages for figures and better typesetting:\n\\usepackage{microtype}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{subcaption}\n\\usepackage{natbib}\n\\usepackage{booktabs} % for professional tables\n\n% hyperref makes hyperlinks in the resulting PDF.\n% If your build breaks (sometimes temporarily if a hyperlink spans a page)\n% please comment out the following usepackage line and replace\n% \\usepackage{icml2026} with \\usepackage[nohyperref]{icml2026} above.\n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\n\\usepackage{listings}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\lstset{\n basicstyle=\\small\\ttfamily,\n breaklines=true,\n breakatwhitespace=true,\n frame=single,\n backgroundcolor=\\color{gray!8},\n columns=fullflexible,\n}\n\n\\usepackage{tikz}\n\\usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, arrows.meta,\npositioning}\n\n\n% Attempt to make hyperref and algorithmic work together better:\n\\newcommand{\\theHalgorithm}{\\arabic{algorithm}}\n\n% Use the following line for the initial blind version submitted for review:\n% \\usepackage{icml2026}\n\n% For preprint, use\n% \\usepackage[preprint]{icml2026}\n\n% If accepted, instead use the following line for the camera-ready submission:\n\\usepackage[accepted]{icml2026}\n\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{amssymb}\n\\usepackage{mathtools}\n\\usepackage{amsthm}\n\n\n% if you use cleveref..\n\\usepackage[capitalize,noabbrev]{cleveref}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% THEOREMS\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\theoremstyle{plain}\n\\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]\n\\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}\n\\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}\n\\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}\n\\theoremstyle{definition}\n\\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}\n\\newtheorem{assumption}[theorem]{Assumption}\n\\theoremstyle{remark}\n\\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}\n\n% Todonotes is useful during development; simply uncomment the next line\n% and comment out the line below the next line to turn off comments\n%\\usepackage[disable,textsize=tiny]{todonotes}\n\\usepackage[textsize=tiny]{todonotes}\n\n% The \\icmltitle you define below is probably too long as a header.\n% Therefore, a short form for the running title is supplied here:\n\\icmltitlerunning{TreeAgent: A Generalizable Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Bias Labeling in Forestry}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\\twocolumn[\n \\icmltitle{TreeAgent: A Generalizable Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Bias Labeling in Forestry via Compiled Expert Rules and Vision-Language Models}\n\n % It is OKAY to include author information, even for blind submissions: the\n % style file will automatically remove it for you unless you've provided\n % the [accepted] option to the icml2026 package.\n\n % List of affiliations: The first argument should be a (short) identifier you\n % will use later to specify author affiliations Academic affiliations\n % should list Department, University, City, Region, Country Industry\n % affiliations should list Company, City, Region, Country\n\n % You can specify symbols, otherwise they are numbered in order. Ideally, you\n % should not use this facility. Affiliations will be numbered in order of\n % appearance and this is the preferred way.\n \\icmlsetsymbol{equal}{*}\n\n \\begin{icmlauthorlist}\n \\icmlauthor{Shiyi Chen}{sch}\n \\icmlauthor{Nicholas Saban}{sch}\n \\icmlauthor{Collin Hargreaves}{sch}\n \\icmlauthor{Huiqi Wang}{sch}\n % \\icmlauthor{Firstname5 Lastname5}{equal,yyy}\n % \\icmlauthor{Firstname6 Lastname6}{equal,sch,yyy,comp}\n % \\icmlauthor{Firstname7 Lastname7}{comp}\n %\\icmlauthor{}{sch}\n % \\icmlauthor{Firstname8 Lastname8}{sch}\n %\\icmlauthor{}{sch}\n %\\icmlauthor{}{sch}\n \\end{icmlauthorlist}\n\n % \\icmlaffiliation{yyy}{Department of XXX, University of YYY, Location, Country}\n % \\icmlaffiliation{comp}{Company Name, Location, Country}\n \\icmlaffiliation{sch}{University of California, Berkeley, California, United States}\n\n % \\icmlcorrespondingauthor{Firstname1 Lastname1}{first1.last1@xxx.edu}\n \\icmlcorrespondingauthor{Huiqi Wang}{huiqiwang@berkeley.edu}\n\n % You may provide any keywords that you find helpful for describing your\n % paper; these are used to populate the \"keywords\" metadata in the PDF but\n % will not be shown in the document\n \\icmlkeywords{Machine Learning, ICML, AI4Science}\n\n \\vskip 0.3in\n]\n\n% this must go after the closing bracket ] following \\twocolumn[ ...\n\n% This command actually creates the footnote in the first column listing the\n% affiliations and the copyright notice. The command takes one argument, which\n% is text to display at the start of the footnote. The \\icmlEqualContribution\n% command is standard text for equal contribution. Remove it (just {}) if you\n% do not need this facility.\n\n% Use ONE of the following lines. DO NOT remove the command.\n% If you have no special notice, KEEP empty braces:\n\\printAffiliationsAndNotice{} % no special notice (required even if empty)\n% Or, if applicable, use the standard equal contribution text:\n% \\printAffiliationsAndNotice{\\icmlEqualContribution}\n\n\\begin{abstract}\nHuman-labeled data are widely used as reference annotations in ML, despite known variability across annotators in many expert-driven domains. In addition, expert annotation is slow, inconsistent, and remains a major bottleneck for scaling tasks like tree height bias classification in forestry remote sensing. We propose a multi-agent system (MAS) that orchestrates expert decision trees with Vision-Language Models (VLMs), treating the decision tree as a structural prior while VLMs perform localized semantic perception at individual nodes, with multi-agent voting to mitigate VLM stochasticity. We formalize a Decoupled Declarative Decision (D3) Framework that enables zero-modification generalization across diverse expert-defined decision structures. On a tree bias classification testbed, our framework outperforms supervised ML baselines and reduces the amount of expert labeling effort required. These results suggest that agentic orchestration of VLMs with expert priors can reproduce expert-defined labeling procedures at substantially lower annotation cost while maintaining interpretability.\n\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\\section{Introduction}\nTree height underpins terrestrial carbon accounting, biomass estimation, and \nthe climate policies that depend on them~\\citep{TOMPALSKI2014167, essd-17-965-2025}. \nYet its three dominant data sources---field measurements, airborne lidar point \nclouds, and lidar-derived canopy height models (CHMs)---systematically \ndisagree, each with distinct error modes: field crews struggle with tree tops \nin closed canopies, lidar misses apexes at low pulse density, and CHMs inherit both issues while adding gridding and interpolation artifacts. The true height of a tree is rarely directly observed, and the bias structure is heterogeneous across trees~\\citep{WANG2019132, terrynGCB}.\n\nTo correct these biases at scale, domain experts hand-label individual trees using a rule-based diagnostic that distinguishes seven bias types from the geometry of measurement disagreement and local canopy context. Each tree takes 3--5 minutes of expert time, and inter-expert inconsistency injects noise into the very \"reference\" data that downstream ML correction models depend on. Across continental-scale inventories, however, this does not scale.\n\nWe argue this task is well suited to a multi-agent LLM system. The expert \ndiagnostic is naturally decomposable: retrieve relevant measurements, reason \nover their numerical disagreement against a structured rule set, and inspect \npoint-cloud or CHM figures only when the numbers are ambiguous. This \ndecomposition lets us encode expert rules symbolically rather than hoping an \nLLM internalizes them from prompts, and invokes a vision-language model only \nat the perceptual steps where it is needed---yielding decisions auditable \nagainst the same rule book the experts use.\n\nNaively encoding expert rules, however, creates a new bottleneck: symbolic \nclassifiers tightly couple domain logic with implementation, so every \nthreshold revision or taxonomy change requires re-engineering. We address \nthis with the \\textbf{Decoupled Declarative Decision (D3) framework}, which \nseparates \\emph{what} to decide from \\emph{how} to decide it. D3 has two \ncomponents: a \\emph{Logic Primitive Inventory} (LPI) defining a closed \nvocabulary of atomic execution primitives, and a \\emph{Neural Rule Transpiler} \n(NRT) that compiles natural-language expert rules into executable, \nvalidatable decision graphs over the LPI~\\citep{lpi, gorski2025integratingexpertknowledgelogical}. \nRule revisions become configuration edits; every decision is traceable to \nthe rule that produced it.\n\nConcretely, we ask: \\textbf{(RQ1)} Can a VLM reliably detect the perceptual \ncues, canopy overlap, ground outliers, that experts rely on? \n\\textbf{(RQ2)} Can a multi-agent system, given expert rules, classify the \nseven bias types end-to-end? \\textbf{(RQ3)} Does the resulting system outperform conventional ML \nclassifiers on this task?\n\nWe instantiate D3 as \\textbf{TreeAgent}, a multi-agent system that answers \nthese questions affirmatively. Our contributions are: \\textbf{(C1)} the \n\\emph{D3 framework} for decoupling expert classification logic from \nexecution, with a closed LPI and an LLM-based NRT that compiles expert \nrules into validated, auditable decision graphs; \\textbf{(C2)} \\emph{TreeAgent}, \nan instantiation encoding a forestry expert's seven-class bias diagnostic, \nwith a majority-vote VLM agent handling the graph's perceptual nodes; and \n\\textbf{(C3)} an \\emph{empirical evaluation} on expert-labeled trees from \ntwo held-out NEON sites showing TreeAgent reaches 67.6\\% Macro-F1 at \n$\\sim$0.040 minutes per tree, against a tuned tabular ML baseline at 36.2\\% \nmacro-F1 despite extensive feature engineering, imbalance correction, and \ntabular foundation-model substitution.\n\nBeyond forestry, D3 offers a general recipe for scientific labeling \nworkflows where expert reasoning is structured, evolving, and requires \noccasional perceptual judgment---a regime where end-to-end models discard \ninterpretability and single-prompt LLMs discard reliability.\n\n\\section{Related Work}\n\\label{sec:related}\n\n\\paragraph{LLMs as compilers for expert knowledge.} A growing line of work\nintegrates expert knowledge into LLM-driven pipelines as structured programs\nrather than free-form prompts \\citep{gorski2025integratingexpertknowledgelogical}.\nD3 sits in this lineage but enforces a closed primitive inventory at compile\ntime, so every executable graph is statically validatable before deployment.\n\n\\paragraph{Tabular ML and small-data scientific labeling.} Gradient-boosted\ntrees remain the dominant model family on small tabular tasks\n\\citep{breiman2001random,chen2016xgboost,ke2017lightgbm,grinsztajn2022tree};\nrecent tabular foundation models extend this regime with in-context learning\n\\citep{hollmann2025tabpfn}. We use these as the supervised baseline and show\nthat even with imbalance correction \\citep{chawla2002smote, lin2017focal} and\ntransductive adaptation \\citep{lee2013pseudo}, a tuned ensemble does not match\nthe agent system on the seven-class target.\n\n\\paragraph{Forestry remote sensing.} The NEON Airborne Observation Platform and\nthe broader literature on LiDAR-derived canopy products document the standard\ndata products and their uncertainties\n\\citep{duncanson2015importance,thorpe2016introduction}; per-tree bias-source\nclassification has not previously been attempted at scale.\n\n\\section{Methods}\n\\subsection{The D3 Framework}\n\\label{sec:d3}\n\n\\begin{figure*}\n \\vskip 0.1in\n \\begin{center}\n \\centerline{\\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth,trim=0 10 0 80,clip]{d3.pdf}}\n \\caption{\n \\textbf{Overview of the D3 Framework.} The architecture decouples\ndomain-specific logic through a fixed Logic Primitive Inventory (LPI).\n\\textbf{Top:} the Neural Rule Transpiler (NRT) translates an unstructured\nexpert rule $\\rho$ into a structured JSON tree configuration $\\mathcal{T}$ via\na single inference call. \\textbf{Bottom:} distinct expert strategies\n($\\rho_A, \\rho_B$) are compiled into different executable tree structures\nwithout altering the underlying Orchestrator or VLM Agent code, achieving\nzero-modification generalizability.}\n \\label{fig:d3}\n \\end{center}\n\\end{figure*}\n\nContinuous efforts have been made to integrate expert knowledge into structured forms using LLMs~\\citep{gorski2025integratingexpertknowledgelogical}. We propose \\textbf{Decoupled Declarative Decision (D3) Framework}, which, as the architectural backbone of TreeAgent, adopts and expands this idea to also include VLMs. D3 separates \\emph{what} a domain expert wants to decide from \\emph{how} the system executes that decision. The expert writes a rule $\\rho$ in structured\nnatural language; D3 compiles it into a typed graph $\\mathcal{T}$ over a fixed, finite \\textbf{Logic Primitive Inventory} ($\\mathcal{V}$); and an orchestrator runs $\\mathcal{T}$ on incoming samples (Figure~\\ref{fig:d3}). Two practical properties follow: \\textbf{verifiability} --- every classification is traceable to the rule node that produced it, since the rule is compiled into an inspectable graph rather than absorbed into model weights --- and \\textbf{zero-modification generalizability} --- when an expert revises a condition or the diagnostic flow, the change is a configuration edit, not a code change.\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n\\subsubsection{Logic Primitive Inventory (LPI)}\n\\label{sec:lpi}\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n\nThe LPI defines a fixed, finite set of node classes\n$\\mathcal{V} = \\mathcal{V}_{\\text{det}} \\cup \\mathcal{V}_{\\text{vlm}} \\cup \\mathcal{V}_{\\text{exit}}$,\npartitioned by \\emph{execution type} $\\omega(v) \\in \\{\\texttt{det},\\,\\texttt{vlm},\\,\\texttt{exit}\\}$.\nThe execution type determines \\emph{how} the orchestrator will evaluate a node:\n\\texttt{det} nodes are resolved by a closed-form arithmetic predicate;\n\\texttt{vlm} nodes are resolved by querying the vision-language model agent;\n\\texttt{exit} nodes terminate execution and return a class label.\nEach node class $v \\in \\mathcal{V}$ is a tuple\n\n\\begin{equation}\n v = \\bigl\\langle\\,\\mathrm{id}(v),\\;\\omega(v),\\;\\varepsilon(v),\\;\\vartheta(v)\\bigr\\rangle,\n \\label{eq:node-tuple}\n\\end{equation}\n\nwhere $\\varepsilon(v) \\subseteq \\mathcal{F} \\cup \\mathcal{I}$ is the \\emph{expected input signature}---the subset of tabular metric fields $\\mathcal{F}$ and/or image modalities $\\mathcal{I}$ that the node's evaluation kernel requires---and\n$\\vartheta(v)$ is the \\emph{evaluation kernel}: a predicate or prompt whose\noutput is always binary ($\\{0,1\\}$), forming the branching condition\nthat routes the traversal to one of two successor nodes.\n\n\\textbf{Deterministic nodes} ($\\mathcal{V}_{\\text{det}}$) evaluate a closed-form predicate over $\\varepsilon(v) \\subseteq \\mathcal{F}$, giving an exact,\nside-effect-free outcome $o_v = \\vartheta(v)(x_{\\varepsilon(v)}) \\in \\{0,1\\}$.\n\\textbf{VLM nodes} ($\\mathcal{V}_{\\text{vlm}}$) dispatch $\\vartheta(v)$ as a\nnatural-language prompt to a vision-language agent operating on the image\nmodalities in $\\varepsilon(v)$; the agent returns a binary outcome.\n\\textbf{Exit nodes} ($\\mathcal{V}_{\\text{exit}}$) carry a class label\n$\\vartheta(v) \\in \\mathcal{L}$ and terminate execution.\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n\\subsubsection{Tree Configuration}\n\\label{sec:tree-config}\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n\nA \\emph{tree configuration} $\\mathcal{T}$ is a directed acyclic graph instantiated\nover $\\mathcal{V}$:\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n \\mathcal{T} = \\langle\\,\\texttt{tree\\_id},\\;r,\\;N,\\;E\\,\\rangle,\n \\label{eq:tree-config}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhere $\\texttt{tree\\_id}$ uniquely identifies the configuration,\n$r \\in N$ is the root node, $N$ is a multiset of node instances drawn from\n$\\mathcal{V}$, and\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n E \\subseteq N_{\\lnot\\text{exit}} \\times \\{0,1\\} \\times N\n \\label{eq:edge-set}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nis the edge relation mapping each non-exit node and binary outcome to a unique\nsuccessor. A valid $\\mathcal{T}$ satisfies two well-formedness conditions:\n(1)~\\textbf{Completeness}: every $n \\in N_{\\lnot\\text{exit}}$ has exactly one\noutgoing edge for each outcome in $\\{0,1\\}$; and\n(2)~\\textbf{Vocabulary closure}: the class of every $n \\in N$ is an element of\n$\\mathcal{V}$, enforced by a deterministic post-compilation validator\n(Section~\\ref{sec:nrt}).\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n\\subsubsection{Neural Rule Transpiler (NRT)}\n\\label{sec:nrt}\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n\nGiven an expert rule $\\rho$ expressed in structured natural language and a tree\nidentifier \\texttt{tree\\_id}, the NRT produces a tree configuration:\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n \\mathcal{C}_{\\theta} : (\\rho,\\;\\texttt{tree\\_id}) \\;\\longmapsto\\; \\mathcal{T},\n \\label{eq:nrt}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhere $\\mathcal{C}_{\\theta}$ is an LLM with parameters $\\theta$, prompted with the full vocabulary $\\mathcal{V}$ and the JSON schema of $\\mathcal{T}$.\nThe model is constrained to output only the JSON serialisation of $\\mathcal{T}$; the\noutput space is therefore restricted to $\\{\\mathcal{T} : \\forall n \\in N,\\, \\mathrm{class}(n) \\in \\mathcal{V}\\}$. Compilation is a single inference call with no\nagentic loop. Appendix~\\ref{app:d3} includes the prompts for the NRT. \n\nTwo properties follow from this design.\n\\textbf{Verifiability.} Because $\\mathcal{V}$ is finite and known at compile time, the validator runs in $O(|N|)$ by checking class membership for each node. Any\n$\\mathcal{T}$ that fails validation is rejected before reaching the orchestrator, guaranteeing that only structurally valid trees are executed.\n\\textbf{Semantic alignment without schema exposure.} $\\mathcal{C}_{\\theta}$ performs\nimplicit field grounding: natural-language variable references in $\\rho$ (e.g.\\\n``field-measured tree height'') are mapped to canonical identifiers in $\\mathcal{F}$\n(e.g.\\ \\texttt{h\\_field}) as a by-product of compilation. The interface to the domain expert is therefore unrestricted prose $\\rho$; the interface to the orchestrator is a fully typed, validated $\\mathcal{T}$. No schema knowledge is required of the expert.\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n\\subsubsection{Orchestrator Execution}\n\\label{sec:orchestrator}\n% % ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% The orchestrator traverses $\\mathcal{T}$ on a sample\n% $\\mathbf{x} = (\\mathbf{x}_\\mathcal{F}, \\mathbf{x}_\\mathcal{I})$ via\n% $n_{t+1} = \\mathrm{succ}(n_t, o_{n_t}(\\mathbf{x}))$, where $o_{n_t}$ is computed\n% by the deterministic predicate or VLM agent attached to $n_t$. Execution\n% terminates at an exit node and the corresponding label is returned. The\n% orchestrator is parameterized entirely by $\\mathcal{T}$ and contains no\n% rule-specific code, so any rule expressible as a binary decision process over\n% $\\mathcal{F} \\cup \\mathcal{I}$ runs without code changes.\nThe orchestrator traverses $\\mathcal{T}$ given a sample\n$\\mathbf{x} = (\\mathbf{x}_{\\mathcal{F}},\\,\\mathbf{x}_{\\mathcal{I}})$:\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n n_{t+1} = \\mathrm{succ}(n_t,\\; o_{n_t}(\\mathbf{x})),\n \\label{eq:traversal}\n\\end{equation}\n\n\\begin{equation}\n o_{n_t}(\\mathbf{x}) =\n \\begin{cases}\n \\begin{aligned}\n &\\vartheta(n_t)\\!\\left(\\mathbf{x}_{\\varepsilon(n_t)}\\right) \\\\\n &\\quad\\text{if } \\omega(n_t) = \\texttt{det}, \\\\[4pt]\n &\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathrm{vlm}}\\!\\left(\\vartheta(n_t),\\,\n \\mathbf{x}_{\\varepsilon(n_t)},\\, \\texttt{tree\\_id}\\right) \\\\\n &\\quad\\text{if } \\omega(n_t) = \\texttt{vlm},\n \\end{aligned}\n \\end{cases}\n \\label{eq:traversal1}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhere $\\mathrm{succ}(n,o)$ looks up the successor of node $n$ under outcome $o$\nin $E$. Execution terminates when $\\omega(n_t) = \\texttt{exit}$, at which point\n$\\vartheta(n_t) \\in \\mathcal{L}$ is returned as the classification label. The\norchestrator contains no expert rules and is entirely agnostic to the structure of\n$\\mathcal{T}$.\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n\\subsubsection{Configuration Generalizability}\n\\label{sec:generalizability}\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n\nThe central property of the D3 Framework is zero-modification reconfigurability within a domain whose decision logic can be expressed using the available primitive inventory:\nfor any expert rule $\\rho'$ from the same domain, the full pipeline\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n \\rho' \\;\\xrightarrow{\\mathcal{C}_\\theta}\\; \\mathcal{T}' \\;\\xrightarrow{\\text{orchestrator}}\\; \\hat{y}\n \\label{eq:generalizability}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nrequires no changes to $\\mathcal{V}$, $\\mathcal{C}_\\theta$, the validator, or the\norchestrator, provided $\\rho'$ can be expressed as a binary decision process over\n$\\mathcal{F} \\cup \\mathcal{I}$. This holds because the orchestrator's traversal\n(Eq.~\\ref{eq:traversal1}) is parameterised entirely by $\\mathcal{T}$, not\nhard-coded to any particular rule.\n\nTo evaluate zero-modification reconfigurability independently of end-to-end\nperformance, we authored five expert rules in natural language with varying root nodes, branching order, and subsets of\n$\\mathcal{V}$ classes, and passed\neach to the NRT in a single inference call. All compilations produced tree configurations that passed both manual inspection and the automated vocabulary-closure / completeness validator described in Section~\\ref{sec:nrt}.\n\n\\subsection{The VLM Agent Architecture}\n\\label{sec:vlm}\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\vskip 0.1in\n \\begin{center}\n \\centerline{\\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{vlm.pdf}}\n \\caption{\n \\textbf{The VLM agent.} Each VLM node receives a node-specific prompt\n$\\vartheta(v)$, image modalities, and structured fields. To suppress\nstochasticity, $K{=}3$ independent samples at temperature $\\tau{=}0.2$ are\naggregated by majority vote. Two node classes use deterministic fallbacks when\nthe input alone is sufficient.\n }\n \\label{fig:vlm}\n \\end{center}\n\\end{figure}\n\\paragraph{VLM agent.} Each VLM node delegates to a vision-language agent\n$\\mathcal{A}_\\text{vlm}$ that receives the prompt $\\vartheta(v)$, image inputs\n$x_{\\mathcal{I}(v)}$, and the \\texttt{tree\\_id}. To mitigate sampling variance,\nwe wrap the base model in a $K=3$ majority vote at temperature $\\tau=0.2$:\n$o_v = \\mathbf{1}\\bigl[\\sum_k \\hat o_v^{(k)} \\geq K/2\\bigr]$, with each\n$\\hat o_v^{(k)} \\in \\{0,1\\}$ parsed by regex from the model's response\n(Figure~\\ref{fig:vlm}).\n\n\\paragraph{VLM Input Figures.} For each tree the agent receives (i) a bird's-\neye CHM window with crown polygons drawn as dashed circles, stems as brown\ndots, and canopy height as a color gradient; and (ii) a two-panel transect\ncross-section through the stem in the N--S and E--W directions, with returns\ncolored by LiDAR class.\n\n% Each VLM node $v \\in \\mathcal{V}_{\\text{vlm}}$ delegates its evaluation to a VLM agent $\\mathcal{A}_{\\text{vlm}}$. The agent receives a natural-language prompt $\\vartheta(v)$, a set of image modalities $x_{\\mathcal{I}(v)}$, optional data fields $x_{\\mathcal{F}(v)}$, and the \\texttt{tree\\_id} for provenance conditioning. It returns a binary outcome $o_v \\in \\{0, 1\\}$.\n\n% \\paragraph{Majority-Vote Ensemble.}\n% VLM inference is stochastic even at low temperature. To mitigate output variance, we wrap the base model call in a majority-vote ensemble ~\\citep{choi2025debate} of $K$ independent samples drawn at temperature $\\tau > 0$:\n\n% \\begin{equation}\n% o_v = \\mathbf{1}\\!\\left[\\sum_{k=1}^{K} \\hat{o}_v^{(k)} \\geq \\frac{K}{2}\\right]\n% \\label{eq:voting}\n% \\end{equation}\n% % \\begin{equation}\n% % \\quad \\hat{o}_v^{(k)} \\sim \\mathcal{A}_{\\text{vlm}}\\!\\left(\\vartheta(v),\\, x_{\\mathcal{I}(v)},\\, x_{\\mathcal{F}(v)},\\, \\texttt{tree\\_id};\\, \\tau\\right)\n% % \\label{eq:vlmOutcome}\n% % \\end{equation}\n\n% \\noindent where each $\\hat{o}_v^{(k)} \\in \\{0,1\\}$ is parsed from the model's\n% free-text response via regex matching on the tokens \\texttt{true}/\\texttt{false}. In our experiments we use $K = 3$ and $\\tau = 0.2$.\n\n\\subsection{VLM Prompt Design}\n\\label{sec:vlm-prompt}\nTwo VLM node classes require visual judgment that cannot be reduced to a formula. Appendix~\\ref{app:prompts} includes the prompts for the two VLM nodes. \n\n\\texttt{CrownOverlap} requires deciding whether a neighboring tree's dashed crown-delineation circle intersects the target tree's crown in a bird's-eye CHM rendering, a judgment that depends on visual context (relative crown sizes, partial occlusion, plot edge effects) and cannot be reduced to a closed-form predicate over the available tabular fields.\n\n\\texttt{GroundPcdOutlier} checks whether the ground elevation for a tree in a given year is abnormally high compared to other survey years. A false high ground reading compresses the tree height and requires inspection of a time series transect image of ground elevation across years to spot the outlier.\n\nWe test four prompt versions on \\texttt{CrownOverlap} to determine how much guidance the model needs to make this call reliably.\n\n\\paragraph{VLM Input Figures.} Each tree in the evaluation set is represented by\ntwo figures passed as visual context:\n\n\\textbf{(i)}~a bird's-eye canopy height model (CHM)\nwindow, with individual tree crown boundaries shown as dashed circles, stem\nlocations as brown dots, and canopy height as a color gradient.\n\n\\textbf{(ii)}~a two-panel transect cross-section showing the full point\ncloud in the N--S and E--W directions through the target stem, with returns\ncolored by LiDAR class (ground, low vegetation, high vegetation) and the\nfield-survey measurement point annotated as a red circle.\n\n\\paragraph{VLM Prompt variants.}\nWe test four prompt versions of increasing detail; full text is in\nAppendix~\\ref{app:prompts}.\nTable~\\ref{tab:prompt-variants} shows which components each includes.\n\n\\textbf{Minimal} is a bare question with no system context.\n\n\\textbf{V1} adds a system prompt explaining the two figures (color scale, dashed\ncrown circles, stem dots).\n\n\\textbf{V2} keeps the V1 system prompt and adds a five-step chain-of-thought\n\\citep[p.~2]{wei2022chain}: read axes, locate the target crown, check for circle intersection in\nFigure~1, compare neighbor heights, and inspect the Figure~2 transect.\n\n\\textbf{V3} replaces the system prompt with expert framing\n(``experienced forestry and LiDAR analyst'') and provides the most detailed\nper-figure reading instructions, with explicit disambiguation of crown-circle\noverlap versus stem-circle containment.\n\n\\paragraph{Test setup.}\nWe test all four prompt versions on 50 OSBS trees sampled to cover 34\nplot--year combinations (random seed 42), ensuring the test set spans different\nplots and survey years rather than drawing from a single context.\nLabels were assigned manually and marked for crown overlap, yielding 22\npositives and 28 negatives.\n% Each tree is tested independently; the model sees only the two figures and the\n% prompt, never the label.\nWe report overall accuracy, recall (true-positive rate), and specificity\n(true-negative rate).\n\n\\begin{table}[!h]\n \\caption{Components present in each \\texttt{CrownOverlap} prompt variant.\n $\\checkmark$ = included; $-$ = absent.}\n \\label{tab:prompt-variants}\n \\begin{center}\n \\begin{small}\n \\begin{tabular}{lcccc}\n \\toprule\n & Figure & Chain-of- & Expert & \\texttt{taller} \\\\\n Variant & description & thought & framing & in output \\\\\n \\midrule\n Minimal & $-$ & $-$ & $-$ & $-$ \\\\\n V1 & $\\checkmark$ & $-$ & $-$ & $-$ \\\\\n V2 & $\\checkmark$ & $\\checkmark$ & $-$ & $\\checkmark$ \\\\\n V3 & $\\checkmark$ & $\\checkmark$ & $\\checkmark$ & $\\checkmark$ \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n \\end{small}\n \\end{center}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n \\caption{Step-by-step reasoning instructions given to the model in V2 and V3.}\n \\label{tab:cot-steps}\n \\begin{center}\n \\begin{small}\n \\resizebox{\\columnwidth}{!}{%\n \\begin{tabular}{cl}\n \\toprule\n Step & Action \\\\\n \\midrule\n 1 & Read Figure 1 axes and canopy height color scale \\\\\n 2 & Locate the target tree's crown circle in the bird's-eye map \\\\\n 3 & Check whether any neighboring crown circle overlaps the target \\\\\n 4 & If overlap: is that neighbor's canopy visually taller? \\\\\n 5 & Check Figure 2 cross-section for canopy returns above the target apex \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}%\n }\n \\end{small}\n \\end{center}\n \\end{table}\n\n\\subsection{Supervised ML Baseline}\n\\label{sec:ml-baseline}\n\nWe train a tabular classifier on hand-engineered features summarizing each tree's three height sources and its local point-cloud and DTM context, and use it as the supervised baseline against which we compare TreeAgent. The baseline answers a question distinct from the agent's: \\emph{how far does a small-data expert-feature pipeline go on its own?} Its per-class errors also identify which decisions in the expert diagnostic resolve from summary statistics and which require the spatial perception that VLM nodes provide.\n\n\\paragraph{Bias taxonomy.} Each tree carries one of seven labels assigned by an expert from the disagreement pattern among three height sources: $H_{\\mathrm{field}}$ (the field-based height), $H_{\\mathrm{chm}}$ (the canopy height model raster value), and $H_{\\mathrm{pcd}}$ (the maximum point-cloud return inside the crown buffer). All these three values are absolute elevation, with base of tree elevation added. The labels are: \\texttt{bias\\_1}, $H_{\\mathrm{field}}$ underestimation (the survey reads short); \\texttt{bias\\_2}, $H_{\\mathrm{field}}$ overestimation (the survey reads tall); \\texttt{bias\\_3}, $H_{\\mathrm{chm}}$ overestimation (the CHM is inflated by a taller neighboring canopy); \\texttt{bias\\_4}, $H_{\\mathrm{chm}}$ underestimation with $H_{\\mathrm{pcd}}$ matching the field height (the rasterized CHM misses the apex but the raw LiDAR points capture it); \\texttt{bias\\_5}, both $H_{\\mathrm{chm}}$ and $H_{\\mathrm{pcd}}$ underestimate; \\texttt{no\\_bias}, all three sources agree; and \\texttt{unknown}, the expert could not place the tree in any of the above categories within their five-minute labeling budget.\n\n\\paragraph{Data and split.} The dataset contains 283 expert-labeled trees from three NEON sites~\\citep{thorpe2016introduction}: OSBS (Florida pine-oak), WREF (Washington temperate conifers), and SRER (Arizona desert shrubs). We train on all 136 OSBS trees and test on the 147 WREF and SRER trees, predicting the full seven-class taxonomy. The split is geographic by design: it tests whether a classifier trained in one ecosystem generalises to structurally dissimilar ones, which is the operationally relevant question for continental-scale deployment. We retain the \\texttt{unknown} class as a target so the classifier predicts over the same label space the experts produced.\n\n\\paragraph{Features.} We summarize each tree with 25 features grouped by source. From the NEON Vegetation Structure field survey~\\citep{thorpe2016introduction}: four numeric measurements (\\texttt{height}, \\texttt{stemDiameter}, \\texttt{crownRadius}, \\texttt{adjElevation}) and four categorical descriptors (\\texttt{canopyPosition}, \\texttt{plantStatus}, \\texttt{growthForm}, \\texttt{taxonID}). From the canopy height model raster: \\texttt{chm\\_height}, the single-pixel CHM value at the field-survey coordinate, and \\texttt{chm\\_height\\_buff}, the maximum CHM value within a circular buffer of radius $0.9 \\times \\texttt{crownRadius}$ (minimum 1\\,m) centered on the stem; the buffered version recovers the canopy apex when the stem is offset from the tallest pixel, as is common for leaning trees. From the LiDAR point cloud: \\texttt{Z\\_pointcloud} (the mean elevation of returns classified as ground, i.e.\\ LAS classification code 2, inside the per-tree buffer; this is a local terrain height); \\texttt{std\\_pointcloud} (the standard deviation of those ground-point elevations, a local terrain roughness); \\texttt{pointdensity\\_ground\\_tree} (the count of ground points per unit area); and three Digital Terrain Model (DTM) quality measures: \\texttt{dtm\\_nn} (the elevation reported by the nearest defined DTM grid cell), \\texttt{dtm\\_nn\\_dist} (the distance to that cell, where large values flag unreliable terrain interpolation), and \\texttt{dtm\\_buffer} (the mean DTM elevation inside the per-tree buffer). The remaining nine features are derived ratios and differences (Appendix~\\ref{app:features}): notably \\texttt{diff\\_chm\\_survey} ($H_{\\mathrm{chm}} - H_{\\mathrm{field}}$), \\texttt{diff\\_chm\\_buff\\_survey}, \\texttt{ground\\_elevation\\_diff}, and \\texttt{height\\_to\\_crown\\_ratio}.\n\n\\paragraph{Models.} LightGBM~\\citep{ke2017lightgbm} is the primary model, motivated by the dominance of gradient-boosted decision trees on small tabular tasks~\\citep{grinsztajn2022tree}. Class weights are set to inverse class frequency to handle the 4-to-46 sample imbalance across the seven classes. Hyperparameters are fixed (maximum depth 3, 300 boosting rounds, $L_1/L_2$ regularization $=2.0$, subsample $=0.7$); we do not cross-validate given $n_{\\text{train}}=136$. Appendix~\\ref{app:ml-ablations} reports XGBoost~\\citep{chen2016xgboost}, Random Forest~\\citep{breiman2001random}, CatBoost, HistGradientBoosting, a stacking ensemble (LightGBM, RF, and XGBoost feeding a logistic regression meta-learner with out-of-fold predictions), and the TabPFN tabular foundation model~\\citep{hollmann2025tabpfn} as model-family ablations.\n\n\\label{sec:pointnet}\n\\paragraph{Point cloud as features.} The hand-engineered features encode substantial expert knowledge: which CHM neighbourhood to read (buffered max, not point), which ground-quality summaries discriminate, and how to enforce scale-invariance across ecosystems. We isolate the value of this expert pipeline by asking the complementary question: can a learned representation, trained end-to-end on the same raw point clouds, recover this performance from labels alone? A negative result supports the framing of D3, which assumes the expert rules carry information small-data learning cannot easily extract. For each tree we crop the LAS tile to a circular buffer at the field-survey coordinate (radius $= \\max(\\texttt{crownRadius}, 2\\text{m})$), then sample or pad to 1024 points, with the LAS classification code retained as additional feature alongside. Extraction succeeds for all 283 trees. The model is a stripped-down PointNet~\\citep{qi2017pointnet} with three Conv1D layers, batch normalisation, max-pool over points, two FC layers, and dropout; we omit the T-Net because it overfits at this scale. Training uses AdamW with cosine LR decay, balanced class weights, and augmentation by random rotation around the vertical axis, jitter, and 5\\% point dropout. We grid-search hidden width $\\in \\{32, 64, 128\\}$ and learning rate $\\in \\{10^{-3}, 3\\times 10^{-4}\\}$ for 80 epochs each. The split and target match the supervised baseline.\n\n\n\\section{Results}\n\\subsection{TreeAgent Evaluation}\n\\label{sec:treeagent-eval}\n\nWe evaluate TreeAgent on 147 expert-labeled trees from the SRER and WREF\nsites drawn from the NEON API, treating human-assigned bias labels as reference labels produced under the expert diagnostic protocol. We compare against the supervised ML baseline of\nSection~\\ref{sec:ml-baseline} and the single-VLM prompt results of\nSection~\\ref{sec:vlm-eval}.\n\nTreeAgent's behaviour depends on the natural-language rule passed to the\nNRT, and a single expert diagnostic admits several semantically plausible\nphrasings of the \\texttt{NoDiff} tolerance --- $<$ vs $\\le$, and\nnormalisation by $H_{\\mathrm{field}}$ (elevation of the tree apex) vs \\texttt{survey\\_height} (tree height value). To avoid\nconditioning the headline on a post-hoc rule choice, we freeze a single\nrule \\emph{a priori} on procedural grounds and report that as the\nheadline, then report the three remaining variants as a sensitivity check.\nThe frozen-rule layer is the apples-to-apples comparison against the\nLightGBM baseline.\n\n\\paragraph{Headline rule (chosen \\emph{a priori}).}\nThe human annotators used a tolerance of 2\\% of the survey height\nwith non-strict inequality when assigning the \\texttt{NoDiff} label. We\ntherefore freeze\n\\[\n (\\{H_{\\mathrm{chm}}, H_{\\mathrm{pcd}}\\} - H_{\\mathrm{field}}) /\n \\texttt{survey\\_height} \\;\\le\\; 0.02\n\\]\nas the headline rule because it matches the annotation procedure that\ngenerated the ground-truth labels. We emphasise that this rule was\nselected for procedural fidelity, \\emph{not} because it maximised any\ntest metric.\n\n\\paragraph{Headline result.}\nUnder the frozen rule, TreeAgent reaches\n\\textbf{67.6\\%} Macro-F1 with an average per-tree runtime\nof \\textbf{0.040} minutes (Table~\\ref{mas-acc}), against\n36.2\\% Macro-F1 for the tuned LightGBM baseline\n(Section~\\ref{sec:ml-headline}) and roughly 5 minutes per tree for human\nannotation. Per-class recalls under this rule are in\nTable~\\ref{per-class-acc}.\n\n\\begin{table}[!h]\n \\caption{TreeAgent under the frozen headline rule, against the supervised baseline and human annotation (reference). Human labeling is included as a time-cost reference baseline only. }\n \\label{mas-acc}\n \\begin{center}\n \\begin{small}\n \\begin{sc}\n \\resizebox{\\columnwidth}{!}{%\n \\begin{tabular}{lcc}\n \\toprule\n Method & Time (min) & Macro-F1 \\\\\n \\midrule\n TreeAgent (frozen rule) & 0.040\\,$\\pm$\\,0.007 & 67.6\\% \\\\\n Supervised ML (LightGBM) & N/A & 36.2\\% \\\\\n Human Labeling (reference) & 5.0\\,$\\pm$\\,2.0 & N/A \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}%\n }\n \\end{sc}\n \\end{small}\n \\end{center}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table}[!h]\n \\caption{Per-class recall under the frozen headline rule. \\texttt{n} is\n the number of test trees in each class.}\n \\label{per-class-acc}\n \\begin{center}\n \\begin{small}\n \\begin{sc}\n \\resizebox{\\columnwidth}{!}{%\n \\begin{tabular}{lcc}\n \\toprule\n Bias class & Recall & n \\\\\n \\midrule\n 1 \\texttt{H\\_field} underestimation & 72.2$\\pm{17.2}$\\% & 18 \\\\\n 2 \\texttt{H\\_field} overestimation & 65.9$\\pm{9.0}$\\% & 41 \\\\\n 3 \\texttt{H\\_chm} overestimation & 71.4$\\pm{25.2}$\\% & 7 \\\\\n 4 \\texttt{H\\_chm} underestimation only & 66.7$\\pm{20.7}$\\% & 9 \\\\\n 5 \\texttt{H\\_chm} and \\texttt{H\\_pcd} underestimation & 66.7$\\pm{16.0}$\\% & 12 \\\\\n 6 no difference & 85.7$\\pm{0.0}$\\% & 14 \\\\\n 7 unknown & 72.2$\\pm{8.6}$\\% & 46 \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}%\n }\n \\end{sc}\n \\end{small}\n \\end{center}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\paragraph{Human-label variability.} We acknowledge that in practice, trees in complex situations may receive different labels from experts with varying domain experience and training quality. The labels are therefore better viewed as expert reference annotations than as objective ground truth. Since our evaluation assumes a single expert annotation per tree, the reported Macro-F1 should be interpreted as agreement with one expert-generated reference label rather than as an estimate of absolute labeling correctness. Collecting multiple independent annotations per tree and measuring inter-expert agreement would provide a stronger benchmark for future studies.\n\n\\paragraph{Sensitivity to fidelity of expert rule.}\nTo check whether the headline result is an artifact of how the\n\\texttt{NoDiff} predicate is phrased, we re-ran the full pipeline under\nthree additional variants of the same predicate, varying the inequality\n($<$ vs $\\le$) and the normalizer ($H_{\\mathrm{field}}$ vs\n\\texttt{survey\\_height}). All four variants were specified prior\nto evaluation; we did not search for the rule that maximized the performance of the test\n. Table~\\ref{tab:rule-sensitivity} reports per-variant Macro-F1\non the same SRER+WREF test set; we report each variant individually rather\nthan summary statistics, since with $n{=}4$ a mean or percentile would\noverstate what we can conclude. \n\n\\begin{table}[!h]\n \\caption{TreeAgent Macro-F1 under four rule phrasings of the\n \\texttt{NoDiff} predicate, on the SRER+WREF test set. The headline rule\n is frozen \\emph{a priori} for procedural fidelity to the annotation\n procedure.}\n \\label{tab:rule-sensitivity}\n \\begin{center}\n \\begin{small}\n \\begin{sc}\n \\resizebox{\\columnwidth}{!}{%\n \\begin{tabular}{lc}\n \\toprule\n Rule for \\texttt{NoDiff} & Macro-F1 \\\\\n \\midrule\n $(\\{H_{\\mathrm{chm}}, H_{\\mathrm{pcd}}\\} - H_{\\mathrm{field}})\\,/\\,H_{\\mathrm{field}} < 0.02$ & 29.2\\% \\\\\n $(\\{H_{\\mathrm{chm}}, H_{\\mathrm{pcd}}\\} - H_{\\mathrm{field}})\\,/\\,H_{\\mathrm{field}} \\le 0.02$ & 21.9\\% \\\\\n $(\\{H_{\\mathrm{chm}}, H_{\\mathrm{pcd}}\\} - H_{\\mathrm{field}})\\,/\\,\\texttt{survey\\_height} < 0.02$ & 35.2\\% \\\\\n $(\\{H_{\\mathrm{chm}}, H_{\\mathrm{pcd}}\\} - H_{\\mathrm{field}})\\,/\\,\\texttt{survey\\_height} \\le 0.02$ \\textbf{(headline)} & \\textbf{67.6\\%} \\\\\n \\midrule\n LightGBM baseline (Sec.~\\ref{sec:ml-headline}) & 36.2\\% \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}%\n }\n \\end{sc}\n \\end{small}\n \\end{center}\n\\end{table}\n\nThe four variants span 21.9--67.6\\% Macro-F1, with\nthe headline rule, the last of the four. Given a faithfully-encoded rule, the headline rule clearly\noutperforms the LightGBM baseline; the other three variants reach\n21.9--35.2\\% and either match or fall below 36.2\\%. The four rules are mathematically distinct decision procedures: the headline rule remains the closest to the annotation procedure used to generate the reference labels, while the other three answer subtly different questions. The system's accuracy therefore depends on the fidelity between the encoded rule and the rule used by annotators. This is a deliberate design choice — D3 is built to faithfully execute expert rules, not to be robust to misspecification of them — and it places the burden on rule elicitation rather than on the executor.\n\n\\paragraph{Limitations of deterministic rules on edge cases.}\nDespite operating as a deterministic rule-based system at\n$\\mathcal{V}_{\\text{det}}$ nodes, TreeAgent misclassifies 2 trees in the\n\\texttt{NoDiff} class (Bias~6) under the headline rule. Both cases are\nedge-case violations of the 2\\% tolerance. Routing boundary instances to\na VLM node for adjudication is one option, but introducing VLM calls at\ndeterministic nodes would substantially increase per-tree cost and\nlatency. This points to an inherent tension in rule-driven agent\nsystems: hard symbolic thresholds are brittle at their boundaries, but\nsoftening them with learned or visual adjudication carries a non-trivial\ncomputational cost. The rarity of these cases suggests the current\ndesign is a reasonable operating point; future work could consider\nlightweight confidence scoring on deterministic predicates to flag\nboundary cases for targeted VLM escalation.\n\n\n\n\\subsection{VLM Evaluation}\n\\label{sec:vlm-eval}\n\nTable~\\ref{tab:vlm-ablation} reports the \\texttt{CrownOverlap} prompt version\nresults. All four versions tend to predict overlap: the \\textbf{Minimal} prompt\nachieves perfect recall (100\\%) but only 7.1\\% specificity, flagging 26 of 28\nnegative trees as positive. More detailed prompts reduce false positives: V1\ncuts false positives from 26 to 21 and raises specificity to 25.0\\%, while V3\nreduces false positives to 17 and achieves 39.3\\% specificity, the highest of\nany version.\n\nThis comes at a recall cost. V3 misses 2 true overlaps that every other version\ncatches; V2 misses 1. We adopt \\textbf{V1} as the default prompt for the\n\\texttt{CrownOverlap} node because it keeps recall high (100\\%, zero missed\noverlaps) while cutting false positives, and missing a real overlap is a worse\noutcome than a false alarm when a human is reviewing the flags anyway. V3 yields the highest overall accuracy (62\\%) but its missed cases\n mean real overlaps go unflagged.\n\nWhen the model prediction clearly contradicts the image, this reflects a VLM limitation. General-purpose VLMs are pretrained predominantly on natural imagery and have not been exposed to LiDAR-specific rendering conventions~\\citep{weng2025vlmremotesensing}, making it harder to interpret complicated crown boundaries where the decision to label crown overlap is marginal. Fine-tuning an image model on domain-specific LiDAR data is a natural next step. We also note that some ground-truth labels in this set may contain human labeling error.\n\n\n\\begin{table}[h!]\n \\caption{%\n Prompt version results on $n{=}50$ OSBS trees (22 positive, 28 negative).\n Model: \\texttt{claude-sonnet-4-6}.\n FP\\,=\\,false positives; FN\\,=\\,false negatives.\n }\n \\label{tab:vlm-ablation}\n \\begin{center}\n \\begin{small}\n \\begin{tabular}{lcccc}\n \\toprule\n Version & Accuracy & Recall & Specificity & FP / FN \\\\\n \\midrule\n Minimal & 48.0\\% & 100.0\\% & 7.1\\% & 26 / 0 \\\\\n V1 & 58.0\\% & 100.0\\% & 25.0\\% & 21 / 0 \\\\\n V2 & 52.0\\% & 95.5\\% & 17.9\\% & 23 / 1 \\\\\n V3 & 62.0\\% & 90.9\\% & 39.3\\% & 17 / 2 \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n \\end{small}\n \\end{center}\n\\end{table}\n\n\n%--------------------------------------------------------------------\n% -------- BEGIN: Nick's added sections (Results) --------\n%--------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\\subsection{ML Baseline: Headline 7-Class Result}\n\\label{sec:ml-headline}\n\nOn the geographic split (train OSBS $n=136$, test WREF $n=79$ + SRER $n=68$), LightGBM with class-weighted training reaches a test \\textbf{macro-F1 of 36.2\\%} on the seven-class bias taxonomy. Per-site, the model attains 40.8\\% on WREF and 14.2\\% on SRER (Table~\\ref{tab:ml-headline}). Train macro-F1 reaches 86\\%: the model fits OSBS well, but the fit does not fully transfer to either test ecosystem. The dominant per-class failure is \\texttt{bias\\_2} ($H_{\\mathrm{field}}$ overestimation) being predicted as \\texttt{bias\\_4} ($H_{\\mathrm{chm}}$ underestimation only). Both classes produce $H_{\\mathrm{chm}} < H_{\\mathrm{field}}$ and are indistinguishable from summary statistics, discriminating between them requires spatial evidence (was a neighboring crown inflating the field reading? did rasterization miss the apex?) that the tabular features discard. The \\texttt{unknown} class is also hard to predict: it captures trees the experts could not place in any mechanism category within five minutes, so the class spans the same feature space as the other six rather than occupying a coherent region.\n\n\\begin{table}[!h]\n \\caption{Supervised ML baseline on the seven-class bias taxonomy. Train: OSBS ($n=136$). Test: WREF ($n=79$), SRER ($n=68$). Numbers are test macro-F1.}\n \\label{tab:ml-headline}\n \\begin{center}\n \\begin{small}\n \\begin{sc}\n \\begin{tabular}{lc}\n \\toprule\n Site & Test macro-F1 $\\uparrow$ \\\\\n \\midrule\n WREF & 40.8\\% \\\\\n SRER & 14.2\\% \\\\\n \\textbf{Combined (WREF + SRER)} & \\textbf{36.2\\%} \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n \\end{sc}\n \\end{small}\n \\end{center}\n \\vskip -0.1in\n\\end{table}\n\n\n\\paragraph{Robustness of the headline.} The 36.2\\% macro-F1 result is stable\nacross the configuration space; no single intervention pushes performance\nmeaningfully past it. Five interaction features targeting the dominant\n\\texttt{bias\\_2}/\\texttt{bias\\_4} confusion lift macro-F1 to 37.3\\%;\nSMOTE~\\citep{chawla2002smote} and its Borderline and ADASYN variants drop it\nto 30.0\\%--34.1\\%; focal-style reweighting~\\citep{lin2017focal} reaches\n34.5\\%; transductive and \\texttt{unknown}-only\npseudo-labeling~\\citep{lee2013pseudo} stay in 34.9\\%--35.1\\%. Model-family\nsubstitutions (CatBoost 35.3\\%; HistGradientBoosting 26.3\\%;\nLightGBM$+$RF$+$XGBoost stacking~\\citep{breiman2001random,chen2016xgboost}\n20.9\\%) and a tabular foundation model\n(TabPFN~\\citep{hollmann2025tabpfn}, 24.6\\%) all underperform LightGBM. Adding\nthe per-tree point-cloud maximum $H_{\\mathrm{pcd}}$ together with seven\nderived percentile statistics drops macro-F1 to 32.4\\%, and\nPointNet~\\citep{qi2017pointnet} on the cropped raw point clouds underperforms\nthe expert-feature baseline. The largest single performance lift comes from\nabandoning the cross-site split: a pooled classifier on stratified 20\\%\nper-site holdouts reaches $45.1\\% \\pm 7.0\\%$ macro-F1 over five seeds, an\n$+8.9$-point lift over the 36.2\\% headline. Cross-site ecosystem shift\ntherefore accounts for roughly a quarter of the gap to within-site\nperformance, with the remainder reflecting absolute training-set size.\nPer-configuration numbers, the reversed-split robustness check, and full\nablation are in Appendix~\\ref{app:ml-ablations}.\n\n\\paragraph{Limitations.} Four caveats apply. First, $n_{\\mathrm{train}} = 136$\ntrees come from a single site (OSBS); the numbers reflect a worst-case\nsingle-site training scenario. Second, the training set is too small for\nreliable held-out hyperparameter tuning, so we fix hyperparameters by hand.\nThird, results depend on the specific site pairing of the geographic split;\nthe reversed-split numbers in Appendix~\\ref{app:ml-ablations} are the closest\navailable robustness check. Fourth, we report point estimates without\nconfidence intervals; bootstrap CIs would tighten the per-site comparisons\ngiven the single-digit test counts on some bias categories.\n\n\n\n\\section{Conclusion}\n\nWe presented TreeAgent, a multi-agent framework for automated tree-level bias labeling in forest remote sensing that combines expert decision rules with Vision-Language Models under the Decoupled Declarative Decision (D3) framework. TreeAgent achieves substantially higher agreement with expert-provided reference labels than the supervised ML baseline (67.6\\% vs.\\ 36.2\\% Macro-F1) and reproduces expert-defined labels at 0.040 minutes per tree, compared with approximately 5 minutes of expert annotation effort. These results demonstrate that agentic orchestration of structured expert priors with VLMs is a viable path toward scalable, interpretable annotation in domains where ground truth is expensive.\n\nTwo complementary findings characterize the system's current ceiling. First, \\textbf{VLM output is the dominant source of labeling error}: recall is highest in classes resolved by deterministic nodes alone and degrades progressively with VLM involvement. This bottleneck is not a structural flaw of D3, the deterministic layer performs reliably, but a reflection of the limits of current general-purpose VLMs on specialized forestry imagery. Second, the deterministic layer itself exhibits \\textbf{brittleness at threshold boundaries}: two no-difference trees that nominally fall under a pure arithmetic rule are misclassified because their measurements sit at the edge of the 2\\% tolerance, a regime where no symbolic rule can yet substitute for genuine perceptual judgment.\n\nThese findings suggest two directions for future work. On the VLM side, domain adaptation, through fine-tuning on labeled CHM and LiDAR transect imagery or retrieval-augmented prompting with similar resolved cases, could close the accuracy gap in visually ambiguous classes without changing the D3 framework.\nOn the rule side, augmenting the \\texttt{NoDiff} and other threshold predicates\nwith lightweight confidence scores could enable selective VLM escalation,\ntargeting only the cases where the deterministic predicate is genuinely\nuncertain. While evaluated only in forestry, D3 suggests a possible recipe for scientific labeling workflows in domains where expert reasoning is structured and evolving but\noccasional perceptual judgment is unavoidable. By separating what to decide from how to decide it, the framework accommodates rule revisions without\nre-engineering and produces decisions that are auditable against the same\ndiagnostic logic domain experts apply---properties that matter as much for\ntrust and reproducibility as for accuracy in high-stakes annotation pipelines.\n\n\\section*{Impact Statement}\n\nThis work aims to scale expert-driven scientific labeling in forest remote \nsensing, where tree-height bias correction underpins biomass and carbon \nestimates used in climate policy. By orchestrating expert rules with VLMs, \nTreeAgent reduces annotation cost while preserving auditability---each \ndecision traces to an expert rule rather than opaque model weights. To our \nknowledge, this is the first agent system designed for this purpose in \nforestry, with the potential to quantify height-induced biases in tree \nbiomass estimation at national scale far faster than current expert \nworkflows allow. Although demonstrated only in forestry, the framework may be applicable to other domains where expert decision procedures can be formalized into structured rules. We caution \nthat the system's labels are not a substitute for expert review in \nhigh-stakes inventories: VLM errors on perceptual nodes propagate to \ndownstream carbon estimates, and the D3 framework inherits whatever biases \nexist in the encoded expert rules.\n\n\\bibliography{reference}\n\\bibliographystyle{icml2026}\n\n\\appendix\n\\onecolumn\n\\section{D3 Framework Neural Rule Transpiler Prompt}\n\\label{app:d3}\n\\textit{System prompt:}\n\\begin{lstlisting}\nYou are a converter that translates an expert-defined classification rule (written in markdown) into a JSON TreeConfig for a multi-agent tree classifier.\n \nAvailable Node Classes\n \nEach node has a fixed id, type, fields, and condition. You must use ONLY these classes:\n \nDeterministic nodes (evaluate numeric conditions from CSV data and/or presence of data)\n- HeightComparatorChmPcd -> id: \"chm_pcd\" | true if h_chm < h_pcd\n# ...\n# Full node-class definitions withheld pending separate publication.\n \nVLM nodes (require visual inspection of images)\n- CrownOverlap -> id: \"crown_overlap\" | true if crown overlap detected\n- GroundPcdOutlier -> id: \"ground_pcd_outlier\" | true if ground point cloud outlier detected\n \nEnd nodes (classification result)\n- FieldUnderestimation -> id: \"1\" | label: H_field Underestimation\n- FieldOverestimation -> id: \"2\" | label: H_field Overestimation\n- ChmOverestimation -> id: \"3\" | label: H_chm Overestimation\n- ChmUnderestimation -> id: \"4\" | label: H_chm Underestimation\n- ChmPcdUnderestimation -> id: \"5\" | label: H_chm and H_pcd Underestimation\n- NoDifference -> id: \"6\" | label: No Difference\n- Unknown -> id: \"7\" | label: Unknown\n \nOutput Format\n \nOutput ONLY valid JSON, **no explanation, no markdown fences**. The format is:\n \n{\n \"tree_id\": \"<tree_id provided by user>\",\n \"root\": \"<node_id of the first node>\",\n \"nodes\": {\n \"<node_id>\": {\n \"class\": \"<NodeClassName>\",\n \"edges\": {\n \"True\": \"<next_node_id>\",\n \"False\": \"<next_node_id>\"\n }\n },\n ...\n \"<end_node_id>\": {\n \"class\": \"<EndNodeClassName>\"\n }\n }\n}\n \nRules\n- End nodes do NOT have edges.\n- Every non-end node MUST have edges with \"true\" and \"false\" keys.\n- All node ids referenced in edges must exist as keys in \"nodes\".\n- Use the exact node ids listed above (e.g. \"chm_pcd\", \"crown_overlap\", \"1\", \"7\").\n- End nodes (type \"end\") may share ids across the tree since they have no edges.\n- Non-end nodes must have globally unique ids. If the same logical check appears \n at multiple positions with different children, append a suffix to distinguish them,\n e.g. \"chm_pcd_1\", \"chm_pcd_2\". The \"class\" field still indicates which Node class to use.\n- tree_id must be exactly the string passed in by the user.\n\\end{lstlisting}\n\\textit{User prompt:}\n\\begin{lstlisting}\ntree_id: {tree_id}\n\nExpert rule:\n {rule_markdown}\n\nOutput ONLY valid JSON, no explanation, no markdown fences.\n\\end{lstlisting}\n\n\\section{CrownOverlap Prompt Variants}\n\\label{app:prompts}\n\n\\subsection*{Minimal}\n\n\\textit{System prompt:} none.\n\n\\textit{User turn:}\n\\begin{lstlisting}\nIs there crown overlap between the target tree and any neighboring tree?\n\nReturn ONLY this JSON:\n{\n \"crown_overlap_detected\": <true|false>,\n \"confidence\": <0.0-1.0>\n}\n\\end{lstlisting}\n\n\\subsection*{V1}\n\n\\textit{System prompt:}\n\\begin{lstlisting}\nYou are analyzing two LiDAR figures of a forest plot.\n\nFigure 1 - bird's-eye canopy height model (CHM):\n - Background color shows canopy height. Warmer / lighter = taller canopy.\n - Dashed circles show individual tree crown boundaries.\n - Brown dots show stem locations (trunk base).\n - The target tree is identified by its ID in the image title.\n\nFigure 2 - transect cross-section (two side-by-side panels):\n - Left panel: N-S cross-section. Right panel: E-W cross-section.\n - Point cloud colored by LiDAR class:\n Dark gray = ground returns.\n Yellow / orange = low vegetation.\n Green = high vegetation / canopy.\n - Red circles mark survey measurement points.\n\nOutput ONLY valid JSON. No prose, no markdown fences.\n\\end{lstlisting}\n\n\\textit{User turn:}\n\\begin{lstlisting}\nDoes any neighboring tree's crown circle overlap the target tree's crown circle?\n\nReturn exactly this JSON:\n{\n \"crown_overlap_detected\": <true|false>,\n \"overlap_description\": \"<brief description of what you see>\",\n \"confidence\": <0.0-1.0>\n}\n\\end{lstlisting}\n\n\\subsection*{V2}\n\n\\textit{System prompt:} same as V1.\n\n\\textit{User turn:}\n\\begin{lstlisting}\nDoes any neighboring tree's crown circle intersect or overlap the target tree's\ncrown circle, and is that neighbor taller?\n\nStep 1 - Read Figure 1 axes and color scale.\nStep 2 - Locate the target tree's dashed crown circle in Figure 1.\nStep 3 - Do any OTHER crown circles intersect or overlap the TARGET CROWN\n CIRCLE? (Circles cross or one partially covers the other. NOT\n whether a circle covers a stem dot.)\nStep 4 - If overlap found: is that neighbor's CHM color warmer / lighter?\nStep 5 - In Figure 2: are there green (Class 5) returns at a HIGHER elevation\n than the target apex, within the lateral extent of the target crown?\n\nReturn exactly this JSON:\n{\n \"crown_overlap_detected\": <true|false>,\n \"taller_neighbor_detected\": <true|false>,\n \"overlap_description\": \"<2-3 sentences citing specific visual evidence>\",\n \"confidence\": <0.0-1.0>\n}\n\nRules:\n - crown_overlap_detected = true if dashed circles cross, regardless of\n stem positions.\n - taller_neighbor_detected = true only if the overlapping neighbor is\n visually taller.\n - When evidence is ambiguous, default both to false and set confidence < 0.5.\n\\end{lstlisting}\n\n\\subsection*{V3}\n\n\\textit{System prompt:}\n\\begin{lstlisting}\nYou are an experienced forestry and LiDAR expert. Your task is to determine\nwhether a target tree's height measurement could be inflated by a taller\nneighboring tree's crown.\n\nFigure 1 - bird's-eye canopy height model (CHM):\n - Background color shows canopy height. Warmer / lighter = taller canopy.\n - Dashed circles show individual tree crown boundaries.\n - Brown dots show stem locations (trunk base).\n - The target tree is identified by its ID in the image title.\n\nFigure 2 - transect cross-section (two side-by-side panels):\n - Left panel: N-S transect (X = Northing, Y = elevation in meters).\n - Right panel: E-W transect (X = Easting, Y = elevation in meters).\n - Point cloud colored by LiDAR class:\n Class 1 (dark gray): ground returns.\n Class 2 (yellow / orange): low vegetation.\n Class 5 (green): high vegetation / canopy.\n - Red circles mark survey measurement points.\n\nOutput ONLY valid JSON. No prose, no markdown fences.\n\\end{lstlisting}\n\n\\textit{User turn:}\n\\begin{lstlisting}\nDetermine whether any neighboring tree's crown circle intersects or overlaps\nthe target tree's crown circle, and whether any such neighbor is taller.\n\nStep 1 - Read Figure 1 axes and scale (Easting, Northing, height color range).\nStep 2 - Locate the target tree's dashed crown circle; note if identification\n is clear or ambiguous.\nStep 3 - From Figure 1: do any OTHER crown circles intersect or overlap the\n TARGET CROWN CIRCLE? (Circles cross or one partially covers the\n other -- NOT whether a circle covers a stem dot.) If yes, is that\n neighbor's CHM color warmer / lighter (taller)?\nStep 4 - From Figure 2: locate the grey cylinder (target trunk/crown). Are\n there substantial green (Class 5) returns at a HIGHER elevation than\n the target apex within the lateral extent of the target crown?\n\nReturn exactly this JSON:\n{\n \"crown_overlap_detected\": <true|false>,\n \"taller_neighbor_detected\": <true|false>,\n \"overlap_description\": \"<2-3 sentences citing specific visual evidence>\",\n \"confidence\": <0.0-1.0>\n}\n\nRules:\n - crown_overlap_detected = true if dashed circles cross or one partially\n covers the other, regardless of stem positions.\n - taller_neighbor_detected = true only if such a neighbor is visually taller.\n - When evidence is ambiguous, default both to false and set confidence < 0.5.\n\\end{lstlisting}\n\n\\section{Full feature list for the supervised ML baseline}\n\\label{app:features}\n\nTable~\\ref{tab:full-features} lists all 25 features used by the supervised ML baseline (Section~\\ref{sec:ml-baseline}), with their source and a brief description.\n\n\\begin{table}[h]\n\\caption{Complete feature list for the supervised ML baseline. \\emph{Source} indicates whether the feature comes from the NEON Vegetation Structure field survey (Survey), the canopy height model raster (CHM), the LiDAR point cloud (PCD), or is derived from combinations of the above (Derived).}\n\\label{tab:full-features}\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\begin{tabular}{llp{0.55\\textwidth}}\n\\toprule\nName & Source & Description \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\texttt{height} & Survey & Field-tape tree height $H_{\\mathrm{field}}$ (m) \\\\\n\\texttt{stemDiameter} & Survey & Diameter at breast height (cm) \\\\\n\\texttt{crownRadius} & Survey & Crown radius (m) \\\\\n\\texttt{adjElevation} & Survey & Adjusted ground elevation reported in the field record (m) \\\\\n\\texttt{canopyPosition} & Survey & Categorical: dominant, codominant, intermediate, suppressed, open \\\\\n\\texttt{plantStatus} & Survey & Categorical: live, dead, broken, etc. \\\\\n\\texttt{growthForm} & Survey & Categorical: single bole tree, multi-bole tree, sapling, etc. \\\\\n\\texttt{taxonID} & Survey & Categorical: NEON species code (e.g.\\ PIPA2, QULA2) \\\\\n\\addlinespace\n\\texttt{chm\\_height} & CHM & Single-pixel CHM value at the field-survey coordinate (m) \\\\\n\\texttt{chm\\_height\\_buff} & CHM & Maximum CHM value within a buffer of radius $0.9 \\times \\texttt{crownRadius}$ around the stem (m) \\\\\n\\addlinespace\n\\texttt{Z\\_pointcloud} & PCD & Mean elevation of LiDAR returns classified as ground (LAS class 2) inside the per-tree buffer (m) \\\\\n\\texttt{std\\_pointcloud} & PCD & Standard deviation of those ground-point elevations (m) \\\\\n\\texttt{pointdensity\\_ground\\_tree} & PCD & Ground-point density inside the per-tree buffer (points/m$^2$) \\\\\n\\texttt{dtm\\_nn} & PCD & Elevation reported by the nearest defined Digital Terrain Model grid cell (m) \\\\\n\\texttt{dtm\\_nn\\_dist} & PCD & Distance from the field-survey coordinate to that nearest DTM cell (m); large values flag unreliable terrain interpolation \\\\\n\\texttt{dtm\\_buffer} & PCD & Mean DTM elevation inside the per-tree buffer (m) \\\\\n\\addlinespace\n\\texttt{diff\\_chm\\_survey} & Derived & $\\texttt{chm\\_height} - \\texttt{height}$ (m) \\\\\n\\texttt{diff\\_chm\\_survey\\_pct} & Derived & $\\texttt{diff\\_chm\\_survey} / \\texttt{height}$ (unitless) \\\\\n\\texttt{abs\\_diff\\_chm\\_survey} & Derived & $|\\texttt{diff\\_chm\\_survey}|$ (m) \\\\\n\\texttt{diff\\_chm\\_buff\\_survey} & Derived & $\\texttt{chm\\_height\\_buff} - \\texttt{height}$ (m) \\\\\n\\texttt{ground\\_elevation\\_diff} & Derived & $\\texttt{adjElevation} - \\texttt{Z\\_pointcloud}$ (m) \\\\\n\\texttt{ground\\_std\\_to\\_density} & Derived & $\\texttt{std\\_pointcloud} / \\texttt{pointdensity\\_ground\\_tree}$ \\\\\n\\texttt{dtm\\_nn\\_vs\\_buffer} & Derived & $\\texttt{dtm\\_nn} - \\texttt{dtm\\_buffer}$ (m); large values mean DTM disagrees with local LiDAR \\\\\n\\texttt{height\\_to\\_crown\\_ratio} & Derived & $\\texttt{height} / \\texttt{crownRadius}$ (canopy slenderness) \\\\\n\\texttt{height\\_to\\_dbh\\_ratio} & Derived & $\\texttt{height} / \\texttt{stemDiameter}$ \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\nThe five interaction features evaluated in the engineered-features ablation (Section~\\ref{app:ml-ablations}) build on this base set: \\texttt{chm\\_apex\\_drift} $= \\texttt{diff\\_chm\\_survey} - \\texttt{diff\\_chm\\_buff\\_survey}$ (apex offset from the stem), \\texttt{ground\\_noise} $= \\texttt{std\\_pointcloud} / \\texttt{pointdensity\\_ground\\_tree}$ (local terrain noise), \\texttt{rel\\_chm\\_gap} $= \\texttt{diff\\_chm\\_survey} / \\texttt{height}$ (scale-invariant gap), \\texttt{shape\\_x\\_gap} $= \\texttt{height\\_to\\_crown\\_ratio} \\times |\\texttt{diff\\_chm\\_survey}|$ (slenderness $\\times$ gap), and \\texttt{dtm\\_dist\\_x\\_gap} $= \\texttt{dtm\\_nn\\_dist} \\times |\\texttt{diff\\_chm\\_survey}|$ (DTM unreliability $\\times$ gap).\n\n\n\n\n\\section{Tabular ML ablations: full results}\n\\label{app:ml-ablations}\n\nThis appendix contains the per-configuration ablation numbers summarized in\nSection~\\ref{sec:ml-headline}. All numbers are test macro-F1 on the\nOSBS-train, WREF$+$SRER-test geographic split unless otherwise noted; per-site\ncolumns give WREF and SRER.\n\n\\paragraph{Reversed split.} Swapping train and test (train WREF$+$SRER, test\nOSBS) yields a 7-class macro-F1 of 29.1\\%. Cross-site difficulty is roughly\nsymmetric in magnitude: the gap is not an artifact of training on the smallest\nsite, even though OSBS is slightly easier as a training set than as a test set.\n\n\\paragraph{Within-site evaluation.} The cross-site geographic split is the\ndeployment-relevant question, but it conflates two sources of difficulty:\nsmall training sets and structural shift between ecosystems. To isolate the\nstructural-shift cost, we hold out a stratified 20\\% test subset within each\nof the three sites, train on the union of the within-site train sets, and\nevaluate on the union of the test sets (one pooled classifier). Macro-F1\naveraged over five seeds reaches \\textbf{$45.1\\% \\pm 7\\%$} --- a $+8.9\\%$\nlift over the cross-site headline of 36.2\\%. The result is stable across\nsplit fractions $\\{10\\%, 20\\%, 30\\%, 40\\%\\}$ (within $\\pm 0.5\\%$ of the 20\\%\nnumber).\n\n\\paragraph{Site-specific classifiers.} Training one LightGBM per site (using\nthe same within-site 80/20 split) and reporting the macro-average of the\nthree per-site test scores reaches only $34.6\\% \\pm 4.5\\%$. Pooling across\nsites lifts macro-F1 by 10\\% over per-site fitting, even when test data is\nheld out within-site. The signal is therefore in shared structure across\necosystems rather than in site-specific patterns the per-site classifiers\ncould learn from $\\sim 65$--$109$ training trees apiece.\n\n\\paragraph{Engineered features.} Five interaction features target the\n\\texttt{bias\\_2} vs.\\ \\texttt{bias\\_4} confusion that dominates the per-class\nerror: \\texttt{chm\\_apex\\_drift} (the difference between the buffered-crown\nCHM maximum and the at-stem CHM value, flagging trees whose tallest pixel is\noffset from the survey coordinate), \\texttt{ground\\_noise} (the local LiDAR\nground-elevation standard deviation divided by ground-point density, flagging\nnoisy DTM regions), \\texttt{rel\\_chm\\_gap} ($\\texttt{diff\\_chm\\_survey} /\nH_{\\mathrm{field}}$, scale-invariant across short and tall trees),\n\\texttt{shape\\_x\\_gap} (\\texttt{height\\_to\\_crown\\_ratio} multiplied by the\nabsolute CHM--field gap, coupling canopy slenderness with disagreement\nmagnitude), and \\texttt{dtm\\_dist\\_x\\_gap} (\\texttt{dtm\\_nn\\_dist} multiplied\nby the absolute CHM--field gap, up-weighting gaps where the DTM is\nunreliable). Adding these to the headline feature set raises 7-class macro-F1\nfrom 36.2\\% to 37.3\\% and lifts SRER macro-F1 from 14.2\\% to 16.7\\%. The lift is\nsmall because the features target the \\texttt{bias\\_2}/\\texttt{bias\\_4}\nconfusion and do not help the \\texttt{unknown} class.\n\n\\paragraph{Class imbalance.} The 4-to-46 imbalance across the seven classes\ninvites two strategy families: oversampling and loss reweighting.\nSMOTE~\\citep{chawla2002smote} interpolates new minority-class points between\nreal ones; we test it together with its borderline and ADASYN variants. All\nthree drop 7-class macro-F1 (30.4\\%--34.1\\%), because the dominant failure is\nclass overlap rather than imbalance: synthetic \\texttt{bias\\_5} samples\ninterpolated between two real \\texttt{bias\\_5} trees still sit inside the\n\\texttt{bias\\_4} region. Focal-loss-style reweighting~\\citep{lin2017focal}\nreweights each sample's contribution to the loss by $(1/p_c)^{1.5}$, where\n$p_c$ is the class frequency; this also drops macro-F1 (0.345). Inverse-\nfrequency class weighting (already used in the headline) handles imbalance\nwell enough on this data; aggressive minority oversampling does more harm\nthan good.\n\n\\paragraph{Cross-site adaptation.} Transductive\npseudo-labeling~\\citep{lee2013pseudo} adds the model's most confident test\npredictions back into training and refits. On the 7-class target this\nslightly degrades macro-F1 (34.9\\%) but raises SRER macro-F1 (17.1\\%). A\nleak-free variant pseudo-labels only the 23 training-set rows tagged\n\\texttt{unknown} (using a model fit on the labeled rows only), holding all\ntest data out, and reaches macro-F1 35.1\\% with WREF macro-F1 43.0\\%. Both\nvariants help WREF and SRER unevenly without lifting the overall 7-class\nnumber, since the headline classifier's confident predictions on\n\\texttt{unknown} test rows propagate into the augmented training set as\nnoise.\n\n\\paragraph{Model family.} CatBoost (35.3\\%) and HistGradientBoosting (26.3\\%)\nunderperform LightGBM. A stacking ensemble (LightGBM, RF, and XGBoost feeding\na logistic regression meta-learner with out-of-fold predictions) underperforms\nfurther (20.9\\%), because the meta-learner overfits small out-of-fold\npredictions on classes with as few as four training examples.\n\n\\paragraph{Tabular foundation model.} TabPFN~\\citep{hollmann2025tabpfn} run\nend-to-end reaches macro-F1 24.6\\%, well below LightGBM. Its\nsynthetic-tabular prior does not capture the cross-ecosystem structural\nshift between OSBS, WREF, and SRER. Using TabPFN to pseudo-label the most\nconfident 30\\% of test rows and retraining LightGBM on the union (21.6\\%)\ndoes not recover; on the 7-class target the prior's confident wrong\npredictions on the \\texttt{unknown} class propagate as label noise.\n\n\\paragraph{Adding raw point-cloud canopy maximum.} Extracting the per-tree\nmaximum canopy height ($H_{\\mathrm{pcd}}$) and adding it together with seven\nderived point-cloud statistics (98th and 95th percentile heights, mean and\nstandard deviation of return heights, canopy and ground point counts, and\nthe mean ground elevation) drops 7-class macro-F1 to 32.4\\%. Two factors\nexplain this: partial redundancy with the ground-quality features the\nexpert labeling process already encodes, plus overfitting from adding eight\nnew features to a 136-row training set. The result reinforces D3's framing:\neven with the canopy maximum in hand, summary statistics do not resolve the\nmechanism distinction between \\texttt{bias\\_2} ($H_{\\mathrm{field}}$\noverestimation), \\texttt{bias\\_4} ($H_{\\mathrm{chm}}$ raster\nunderestimation), and \\texttt{bias\\_5} ($H_{\\mathrm{chm}}$ and\n$H_{\\mathrm{pcd}}$ both underestimate).\n\n\\paragraph{Raw-data baseline (PointNet).}\nPointNet~\\citep{qi2017pointnet} trained directly on the cropped point clouds\nunderperforms the expert-feature LightGBM on the 7-class target. Every grid\nconfiguration peaks within the first 10--50 epochs and then overfits, and\nlarger hidden widths underperform smaller ones. Concatenating PointNet's\nmax-pooled features with the tabular features and feeding them to LightGBM\n\\emph{degrades} the tabular-only baseline. At $n_{\\mathrm{train}}\\sim 100$,\nthe engineered features encode ecological domain knowledge the network does\nnot recover from labels at this scale.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n \\caption{Full ablation summary on the seven-class bias taxonomy. All numbers are test macro-F1 on the geographic split (OSBS train, WREF$+$SRER test) unless noted; per-site columns give WREF and SRER. The headline number is the supervised baseline (top row).}\n \\label{tab:ml-ablations}\n \\begin{center}\n \\begin{small}\n \\begin{sc}\n\\begin{tabular}{lccc}\n \\toprule\n Configuration & macro-F1 $\\uparrow$ & WREF & SRER \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\textbf{7-class baseline (headline)} & \\textbf{36.2\\%} & 40.8\\% & 14.2\\% \\\\\n \\quad + engineered features & 37.3\\% & 40.5\\% & 16.7\\% \\\\\n \\quad + $H_{\\mathrm{pcd}}$ point-cloud features & 32.4\\% & 33.3\\% & 13.6\\% \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\multicolumn{4}{l}{\\emph{Reversed split (train WREF$+$SRER, test OSBS only)}} \\\\\n \\quad 7-class & 29.1\\% & --- & --- \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\multicolumn{4}{l}{\\emph{Within-site split (mean $\\pm$ std over 5 seeds, 80/20 test)}} \\\\\n \\quad Pooled (one classifier, all three sites) & $45.1\\% \\pm 7.0\\%$ & 47.3\\% & 30.5\\% \\\\\n \\quad Site-specific (per-site, macro-avg) & $34.6\\% \\pm 4.5\\%$ & 40.0\\% & 32.1\\% \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\multicolumn{4}{l}{\\emph{Class imbalance on the original split}} \\\\\n \\quad + focal-style $(1/p_c)^{1.5}$ reweighting & 34.5\\% & 39.3\\% & 12.0\\% \\\\\n \\quad + SMOTE & 31.5\\% & 39.3\\% & 8.7\\% \\\\\n \\quad + Borderline-SMOTE & 30.4\\% & 34.8\\% & 11.0\\% \\\\\n \\quad + ADASYN & 34.1\\% & 44.1\\% & 7.9\\% \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\multicolumn{4}{l}{\\emph{Cross-site adaptation}} \\\\\n \\quad Pseudo-labeling on test (transductive) & 34.9\\% & 37.8\\% & 17.1\\% \\\\\n \\quad Pseudo-labeling on \\texttt{unknown} pool & 35.1\\% & 43.0\\% & 11.3\\% \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\multicolumn{4}{l}{\\emph{Model family}} \\\\\n \\quad CatBoost & 35.3\\% & 39.3\\% & 14.3\\% \\\\\n \\quad HistGradientBoosting & 26.3\\% & 30.3\\% & 11.6\\% \\\\\n \\quad Stacking (LGBM+RF+XGB$\\to$LR) & 20.9\\% & 28.2\\% & 11.8\\% \\\\\n \\quad TabPFN end-to-end & 24.6\\% & 30.2\\% & 13.2\\% \\\\\n \\quad TabPFN pseudo $\\to$ LightGBM & 21.6\\% & 23.5\\% & 13.5\\% \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n \\end{sc}\n \\end{small}\n \\end{center}\n\\end{table}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: icml2026.sty\n================================================\n% File: icml2026.sty (LaTeX style file for ICML-2026, version of 2025-10-29)\n\n% This file contains the LaTeX formatting parameters for a two-column\n% conference proceedings that is 8.5 inches wide by 11 inches high.\n%\n% Modified by Hanze Dong, Alberto Bietti, and Felix Berkenkamp, 2025\n% - Revert to times for better compatibility\n% - Updated years, volume, location\n% - Added preprint version\n% - Based on the suggestion from Johan Larsson:\n% 1. Added an end-of-document safety check to ensure the affiliations or notice footnote is printed:\n% (1) Introduces a flag \\newif\\ificml@noticeprinted and sets it false by default.\n% (2) At end of document, emits a package warning if \\printAffiliationsAndNotice{...} was never called.\n% 2. \\printAffiliationsAndNotice now sets the flag when called: Begins with \\global\\icml@noticeprintedtrue.\n% - Migrated to more recent version of fancyhdr for running title in header\n%\n% Modified by Johan Larsson, 2025\n% - Use newtx instead of times, aligning serif, sans-serif, typerwriter,\n% and math fonts.\n% - Use caption package to setup captions instead of manually defining themanually defining them.\n% - Formatted icml2026.sty and example_paper.tex\n% - Use title case for section title to 2.9\n% - Replace subfigure package with subcaption in example, since it is\n% designed to work together with the caption package (which is now required).\n% - Remove unused label in example\n%\n% Modified by Tegan Maharaj and Felix Berkenkamp 2025: changed years, volume, location\n%\n% Modified by Jonathan Scarlett 2024: changed years, volume, location\n%\n% Modified by Sivan Sabato 2023: changed years and volume number.\n% Modified by Jonathan Scarlett 2023: added page numbers to every page\n%\n% Modified by Csaba Szepesvari 2022: changed years, PMLR ref. Turned off checking marginparwidth\n% as marginparwidth only controls the space available for margin notes and margin notes\n% will NEVER be used anyways in submitted versions, so there is no reason one should\n% check whether marginparwidth has been tampered with.\n% Also removed pdfview=FitH from hypersetup as it did not do its job; the default choice is a bit better\n% but of course the double-column format is not supported by this hyperlink preview functionality\n% in a completely satisfactory fashion.\n% Modified by Gang Niu 2022: Changed color to xcolor\n%\n% Modified by Iain Murray 2018: changed years, location. Remove affiliation notes when anonymous.\n% Move times dependency from .tex to .sty so fewer people delete it.\n%\n% Modified by Daniel Roy 2017: changed byline to use footnotes for affiliations, and removed emails\n%\n% Modified by Percy Liang 12/2/2013: changed the year, location from the previous template for ICML 2014\n\n% Modified by Fei Sha 9/2/2013: changed the year, location form the previous template for ICML 2013\n%\n% Modified by Fei Sha 4/24/2013: (1) remove the extra whitespace after the\n% first author's email address (in %the camera-ready version) (2) change the\n% Proceeding ... of ICML 2010 to 2014 so PDF's metadata will show up %\n% correctly\n%\n% Modified by Sanjoy Dasgupta, 2013: changed years, location\n%\n% Modified by Francesco Figari, 2012: changed years, location\n%\n% Modified by Christoph Sawade and Tobias Scheffer, 2011: added line\n% numbers, changed years\n%\n% Modified by Hal Daume III, 2010: changed years, added hyperlinks\n%\n% Modified by Kiri Wagstaff, 2009: changed years\n%\n% Modified by Sam Roweis, 2008: changed years\n%\n% Modified by Ricardo Silva, 2007: update of the ifpdf verification\n%\n% Modified by Prasad Tadepalli and Andrew Moore, merely changing years.\n%\n% Modified by Kristian Kersting, 2005, based on Jennifer Dy's 2004 version\n% - running title. If the original title is to long or is breaking a line,\n% use \\icmltitlerunning{...} in the preamble to supply a shorter form.\n% Added fancyhdr package to get a running head.\n% - Updated to store the page size because pdflatex does compile the\n% page size into the pdf.\n%\n% Hacked by Terran Lane, 2003:\n% - Updated to use LaTeX2e style file conventions (ProvidesPackage,\n% etc.)\n% - Added an ``appearing in'' block at the base of the first column\n% (thus keeping the ``appearing in'' note out of the bottom margin\n% where the printer should strip in the page numbers).\n% - Added a package option [accepted] that selects between the ``Under\n% review'' notice (default, when no option is specified) and the\n% ``Appearing in'' notice (for use when the paper has been accepted\n% and will appear).\n%\n% Originally created as: ml2k.sty (LaTeX style file for ICML-2000)\n% by P. Langley (12/23/99)\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%% This version of the style file supports both a ``review'' version\n%% and a ``final/accepted'' version. The difference is only in the\n%% text that appears in the note at the bottom of the first column of\n%% the first page. The default behavior is to print a note to the\n%% effect that the paper is under review and don't distribute it. The\n%% final/accepted version prints an ``Appearing in'' note. To get the\n%% latter behavior, in the calling file change the ``usepackage'' line\n%% from:\n%%\t\\usepackage{icml2025}\n%% to\n%%\t\\usepackage[accepted]{icml2025}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesPackage{icml2026}[2025/10/29 v2.0 ICML Conference Style File]\n\n% Before 2018, \\usepackage{times} was in the example TeX, but inevitably\n% not everybody did it.\n% \\RequirePackage[amsthm]{newtx}\n% 2025.11.6 revert to times for better compatibility\n\\RequirePackage{times}\n\n% Use fancyhdr package\n\\RequirePackage{fancyhdr}\n\\RequirePackage{xcolor} % changed from color to xcolor (2021/11/24)\n\\RequirePackage{algorithm}\n\\RequirePackage{algorithmic}\n\\RequirePackage{natbib}\n\\RequirePackage{eso-pic} % used by \\AddToShipoutPicture\n\\RequirePackage{forloop}\n\\RequirePackage{url}\n\\RequirePackage{caption}\n\n%%%%%%%% Options\n\\DeclareOption{accepted}{%\n \\renewcommand{\\Notice@String}{\\ICML@appearing}\n \\gdef\\isaccepted{1}\n}\n\n% === Preprint option ===\n\\DeclareOption{preprint}{%%\n \\renewcommand{\\Notice@String}{\\ICML@preprint}%%\n \\gdef\\ispreprint{1}%%\n}\n\n% Distinct preprint footer text\n\\newcommand{\\ICML@preprint}{%\n \\textit{Preprint. \\today.}%\n}\n\n\\DeclareOption{nohyperref}{%\n \\gdef\\nohyperref{1}\n}\n\n% Helper flag: show real authors for accepted or preprint\n\\newif\\ificmlshowauthors\n\\icmlshowauthorsfalse\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% This string is printed at the bottom of the page for the\n% final/accepted version of the ``appearing in'' note. Modify it to\n% change that text.\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\newcommand{\\ICML@appearing}{\\textit{Proceedings of the\n$\\mathit{43}^{rd}$ International Conference on Machine Learning},\nSeoul, South Korea. PMLR 306, 2026.\nCopyright 2026 by the author(s).}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% This string is printed at the bottom of the page for the draft/under\n% review version of the ``appearing in'' note. Modify it to change\n% that text.\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\newcommand{\\Notice@String}{Preliminary work. Under review by the\nInternational Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)\\@. Do not distribute.}\n\n% Cause the declared options to actually be parsed and activated\n\\ProcessOptions\\relax\n\n% After options are processed, decide if authors should be visible\n\\ifdefined\\isaccepted \\icmlshowauthorstrue \\fi\n\\ifdefined\\ispreprint \\icmlshowauthorstrue \\fi\n\n\\ifdefined\\isaccepted\\else\\ifdefined\\ispreprint\\else\\ifdefined\\hypersetup\n \\hypersetup{pdfauthor={Anonymous Authors}}\n\\fi\\fi\\fi\n\n\\ifdefined\\nohyperref\\else\\ifdefined\\hypersetup\n \\definecolor{mydarkblue}{rgb}{0,0.08,0.45}\n \\hypersetup{ %\n pdftitle={},\n pdfsubject={Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning 2026},\n pdfkeywords={},\n pdfborder=0 0 0,\n pdfpagemode=UseNone,\n colorlinks=true,\n linkcolor=mydarkblue,\n citecolor=mydarkblue,\n filecolor=mydarkblue,\n urlcolor=mydarkblue,\n }\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% Uncomment the following for debugging. It will cause LaTeX to dump\n% the version of the ``appearing in'' string that will actually appear\n% in the document.\n%\\typeout{>> Notice string='\\Notice@String'}\n\n% Change citation commands to be more like old ICML styles\n\\newcommand{\\yrcite}[1]{\\citeyearpar{#1}}\n\\renewcommand{\\cite}[1]{\\citep{#1}}\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% to ensure the letter format is used. pdflatex does compile the\n% page size into the pdf. This is done using \\pdfpagewidth and\n% \\pdfpageheight. As Latex does not know this directives, we first\n% check whether pdflatex or latex is used.\n%\n% Kristian Kersting 2005\n%\n% in order to account for the more recent use of pdfetex as the default\n% compiler, I have changed the pdf verification.\n%\n% Ricardo Silva 2007\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\paperwidth=8.5in\n\\paperheight=11in\n\n% old PDFLaTex verification, circa 2005\n%\n%\\newif\\ifpdf\\ifx\\pdfoutput\\undefined\n% \\pdffalse % we are not running PDFLaTeX\n%\\else\n% \\pdfoutput=1 % we are running PDFLaTeX\n% \\pdftrue\n%\\fi\n\n\\newif\\ifpdf %adapted from ifpdf.sty\n\\ifx\\pdfoutput\\undefined\n\\else\n \\ifx\\pdfoutput\\relax\n \\else\n \\ifcase\\pdfoutput\n \\else\n \\pdftrue\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\\ifpdf\n% \\pdfpagewidth=\\paperwidth\n% \\pdfpageheight=\\paperheight\n \\setlength{\\pdfpagewidth}{8.5in}\n \\setlength{\\pdfpageheight}{11in}\n\\fi\n\n% Physical page layout\n\n\\evensidemargin -0.23in\n\\oddsidemargin -0.23in\n\\setlength\\textheight{9.0in}\n\\setlength\\textwidth{6.75in}\n\\setlength\\columnsep{0.25in}\n\\setlength\\headheight{10pt}\n\\setlength\\headsep{10pt}\n\\addtolength{\\topmargin}{-20pt}\n\\addtolength{\\topmargin}{-0.29in}\n\n% Historically many authors tried to include packages like geometry or fullpage,\n% which change the page layout. It either makes the proceedings inconsistent, or\n% wastes organizers' time chasing authors. So let's nip these problems in the\n% bud here. -- Iain Murray 2018.\n%\\RequirePackage{printlen}\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n\\newif\\ifmarginsmessedwith\n\\marginsmessedwithfalse\n\\ifdim\\oddsidemargin=-16.62178pt \\else oddsidemargin has been altered.\\\\ \\marginsmessedwithtrue\\fi\n\\ifdim\\headheight=10.0pt \\else headheight has been altered.\\\\ \\marginsmessedwithtrue\\fi\n\\ifdim\\textheight=650.43pt \\else textheight has been altered.\\\\ \\marginsmessedwithtrue\\fi\n\\ifdim\\marginparsep=11.0pt \\else marginparsep has been altered.\\\\ \\marginsmessedwithtrue\\fi\n\\ifdim\\footskip=25.0pt \\else footskip has been altered.\\\\ \\marginsmessedwithtrue\\fi\n\\ifdim\\hoffset=0.0pt \\else hoffset has been altered.\\\\ \\marginsmessedwithtrue\\fi\n\\ifdim\\paperwidth=614.295pt \\else paperwidth has been altered.\\\\ \\marginsmessedwithtrue\\fi\n\\ifdim\\topmargin=-24.95781pt \\else topmargin has been altered.\\\\ \\marginsmessedwithtrue\\fi\n\\ifdim\\headsep=10.0pt \\else headsep has been altered.\\\\ \\marginsmessedwithtrue\\fi\n\\ifdim\\textwidth=487.8225pt \\else textwidth has been altered.\\\\ \\marginsmessedwithtrue\\fi\n\\ifdim\\marginparpush=5.0pt \\else marginparpush has been altered.\\\\ \\marginsmessedwithtrue\\fi\n\\ifdim\\voffset=0.0pt \\else voffset has been altered.\\\\ \\marginsmessedwithtrue\\fi\n\\ifdim\\paperheight=794.96999pt \\else paperheight has been altered.\\\\ \\marginsmessedwithtrue\\fi\n\\ifmarginsmessedwith\n\n\\textbf{\\large \\em The page layout violates the ICML style.}\n\nPlease do not change the page layout, or include packages like geometry,\nsavetrees, or fullpage, which change it for you.\n\nWe're not able to reliably undo arbitrary changes to the style. Please remove\nthe offending package(s), or layout-changing commands and try again.\n\n\\fi}\n\n\n%% The following is adapted from code in the acmconf.sty conference\n%% style file. The constants in it are somewhat magical, and appear\n%% to work well with the two-column format on US letter paper that\n%% ICML uses, but will break if you change that layout, or if you use\n%% a longer block of text for the copyright notice string. Fiddle with\n%% them if necessary to get the block to fit/look right.\n%%\n%% -- Terran Lane, 2003\n%%\n%% The following comments are included verbatim from acmconf.sty:\n%%\n%%% This section (written by KBT) handles the 1\" box in the lower left\n%%% corner of the left column of the first page by creating a picture,\n%%% and inserting the predefined string at the bottom (with a negative\n%%% displacement to offset the space allocated for a non-existent\n%%% caption).\n%%%\n\\def\\ftype@copyrightbox{8}\n\\def\\@copyrightspace{\n\\@float{copyrightbox}[b]\n\\begin{center}\n\\setlength{\\unitlength}{1pc}\n\\begin{picture}(20,1.5)\n\\put(0,2.5){\\line(1,0){4.818}}\n\\put(0,0){\\parbox[b]{19.75pc}{\\small \\Notice@String}}\n\\end{picture}\n\\end{center}\n\\end@float}\n\n\\setlength\\footskip{25.0pt}\n\\flushbottom \\twocolumn\n\\sloppy\n\n% Clear out the addcontentsline command\n\\def\\addcontentsline#1#2#3{}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%%% commands for formatting paper title, author names, and addresses.\n\n% box to check the size of the running head\n\\newbox\\titrun\n\n% general page style\n\\pagestyle{fancy}\n\\fancyhf{}\n\\fancyfoot[C]{\\thepage}\n% set the width of the head rule to 1 point\n\\renewcommand{\\headrulewidth}{1pt}\n\n% definition to set the head as running head in the preamble\n\\def\\icmltitlerunning#1{\\gdef\\@icmltitlerunning{#1}}\n\n% main definition adapting \\icmltitle from 2004\n\\long\\def\\icmltitle#1{%\n\n %check whether @icmltitlerunning exists\n % if not \\icmltitle is used as running head\n \\ifx\\undefined\\@icmltitlerunning%\n \\gdef\\@icmltitlerunning{#1}\n \\fi\n\n %add it to pdf information\n \\ifdefined\\nohyperref\\else\\ifdefined\\hypersetup\n \\hypersetup{pdftitle={#1}}\n \\fi\\fi\n\n %get the dimension of the running title\n \\global\\setbox\\titrun=\\vbox{\\small\\bf\\@icmltitlerunning}\n\n % error flag\n \\gdef\\@runningtitleerror{0}\n\n % running title too long\n \\ifdim\\wd\\titrun>\\textwidth%\n \\gdef\\@runningtitleerror{1}%\n % running title breaks a line\n \\else \\ifdim\\ht\\titrun>6.25pt\n \\gdef\\@runningtitleerror{2}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\n % if there is somthing wrong with the running title\n \\ifnum\\@runningtitleerror>0\n \\typeout{}%\n \\typeout{}%\n \\typeout{*******************************************************}%\n \\typeout{Title exceeds size limitations for running head.}%\n \\typeout{Please supply a shorter form for the running head}\n \\typeout{with \\string\\icmltitlerunning{...}\\space prior to \\string\\begin{document}}%\n \\typeout{*******************************************************}%\n \\typeout{}%\n \\typeout{}%\n % set default running title\n \\gdef\\@icmltitlerunning{Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Size}\n \\fi\n\n % no running title on the first page of the paper\n \\thispagestyle{plain}\n\n {\\center\\baselineskip 18pt\n \\toptitlebar{\\Large\\bf #1}\\bottomtitlebar}\n}\n\n% set running title header\n\\fancyhead[C]{\\small\\bf\\@icmltitlerunning}\n\n\\gdef\\icmlfullauthorlist{}\n\\newcommand\\addstringtofullauthorlist{\\g@addto@macro\\icmlfullauthorlist}\n\\newcommand\\addtofullauthorlist[1]{%\n \\ifdefined\\icmlanyauthors%\n \\addstringtofullauthorlist{, #1}%\n \\else%\n \\addstringtofullauthorlist{#1}%\n \\gdef\\icmlanyauthors{1}%\n \\fi%\n \\ifdefined\\hypersetup%\n \\hypersetup{pdfauthor=\\icmlfullauthorlist}%\n \\fi\n}\n\n\\def\\toptitlebar{\\hrule height1pt \\vskip .25in}\n\\def\\bottomtitlebar{\\vskip .22in \\hrule height1pt \\vskip .3in}\n\n\\newenvironment{icmlauthorlist}{%\n \\setlength\\topsep{0pt}\n \\setlength\\parskip{0pt}\n \\begin{center}\n }{%\n \\end{center}\n}\n\n\\newcounter{@affiliationcounter}\n\\newcommand{\\@pa}[1]{%\n \\ifcsname the@affil#1\\endcsname\n % do nothing\n \\else\n \\ifcsname @icmlsymbol#1\\endcsname\n % nothing\n \\else\n \\stepcounter{@affiliationcounter}%\n \\newcounter{@affil#1}%\n \\setcounter{@affil#1}{\\value{@affiliationcounter}}%\n \\fi\n \\fi%\n \\ifcsname @icmlsymbol#1\\endcsname\n \\textsuperscript{\\csname @icmlsymbol#1\\endcsname\\,}%\n \\else\n \\textsuperscript{\\arabic{@affil#1}\\,}%\n \\fi\n}\n\n\\newcommand{\\icmlauthor}[2]{%\n \\ificmlshowauthors\n \\mbox{\\bf #1}\\,\\@for\\theaffil:=#2\\do{\\@pa{\\theaffil}} \\addtofullauthorlist{#1}%\n \\else\n \\ifdefined\\@icmlfirsttime\\else\n \\gdef\\@icmlfirsttime{1}\n \\mbox{\\bf Anonymous Authors}\\@pa{@anon} \\addtofullauthorlist{Anonymous Authors}\n \\fi\n \\fi\n}\n\n\\newcommand{\\icmlsetsymbol}[2]{%\n \\expandafter\\gdef\\csname @icmlsymbol#1\\endcsname{#2}\n}\n\n\\newcommand{\\icmlaffiliation}[2]{%\n \\ificmlshowauthors\n \\ifcsname the@affil#1\\endcsname\n \\expandafter\\gdef\\csname @affilname\\csname the@affil#1\\endcsname\\endcsname{#2}%\n \\else\n {\\bf AUTHORERR: Error in use of \\textbackslash{}icmlaffiliation command. Label ``#1'' not mentioned in some \\textbackslash{}icmlauthor\\{author name\\}\\{labels here\\} command beforehand. }\n \\typeout{}%\n \\typeout{}%\n \\typeout{*******************************************************}%\n \\typeout{Affiliation label undefined. }%\n \\typeout{Make sure \\string\\icmlaffiliation\\space follows }%\n \\typeout{all of \\string\\icmlauthor\\space commands}%\n \\typeout{*******************************************************}%\n \\typeout{}%\n \\typeout{}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\expandafter\\gdef\\csname @affilname1\\endcsname{Anonymous Institution, Anonymous City, Anonymous Region, Anonymous Country}\n \\fi\n}\n\n\\newcommand{\\icmlcorrespondingauthor}[2]{%\n \\ificmlshowauthors\n \\ifdefined\\icmlcorrespondingauthor@text\n \\g@addto@macro\\icmlcorrespondingauthor@text{, #1 \\textless{}#2\\textgreater{}}\n \\else\n \\gdef\\icmlcorrespondingauthor@text{#1 \\textless{}#2\\textgreater{}}\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\gdef\\icmlcorrespondingauthor@text{Anonymous Author \\textless{}anon.email@domain.com\\textgreater{}}\n \\fi\n}\n\n\\newcommand{\\icmlEqualContribution}{\\textsuperscript{*}Equal contribution }\n\n\n% --- ICML 2026: ensure authors do not omit the affiliations/notice footnote ---\n\\newif\\ificml@noticeprinted\n\\icml@noticeprintedfalse\n\\AtEndDocument{%\n \\ificml@noticeprinted\\relax\\else\n \\PackageWarningNoLine{icml2026}{%\n You did not call \\string\\printAffiliationsAndNotice{}. If you have no notice,%\n call \\string\\printAffiliationsAndNotice\\string{} (empty braces).%\n }%\n \\fi\n}\n\n\n\\newcounter{@affilnum}\n\\newcommand{\\printAffiliationsAndNotice}[1]{\\global\\icml@noticeprintedtrue%\n \\stepcounter{@affiliationcounter}%\n {\\let\\thefootnote\\relax\\footnotetext{\\hspace*{-\\footnotesep}\\ificmlshowauthors #1\\fi%\n \\forloop{@affilnum}{1}{\\value{@affilnum} < \\value{@affiliationcounter}}{\n \\textsuperscript{\\arabic{@affilnum}}\\ifcsname @affilname\\the@affilnum\\endcsname%\n \\csname @affilname\\the@affilnum\\endcsname%\n \\else\n {\\bf AUTHORERR: Missing \\textbackslash{}icmlaffiliation.}\n \\fi\n }.%\n \\ifdefined\\icmlcorrespondingauthor@text\n { }Correspondence to: \\icmlcorrespondingauthor@text.\n \\else\n {\\bf AUTHORERR: Missing \\textbackslash{}icmlcorrespondingauthor.}\n \\fi\n\n \\ \\\\\n \\Notice@String\n }\n }\n}\n\n\\long\\def\\icmladdress#1{%\n {\\bf The \\textbackslash{}icmladdress command is no longer used. See the example\\_paper PDF .tex for usage of \\textbackslash{}icmlauther and \\textbackslash{}icmlaffiliation.}\n}\n\n%% keywords as first class citizens\n\\def\\icmlkeywords#1{%\n \\ifdefined\\nohyperref\\else\\ifdefined\\hypersetup\n \\hypersetup{pdfkeywords={#1}}\n \\fi\\fi\n}\n\n% modification to natbib citations\n\\setcitestyle{authoryear,round,citesep={;},aysep={,},yysep={;}}\n\n% Redefinition of the abstract environment.\n\\renewenvironment{abstract}\n{%\n \\centerline{\\large\\bf Abstract}\n \\vspace{-0.12in}\\begin{quote}}\n {\\par\\end{quote}\\vskip 0.12in}\n\n% numbered section headings with different treatment of numbers\n\n\\def\\@startsection#1#2#3#4#5#6{\\if@noskipsec \\leavevmode \\fi\n \\par \\@tempskipa #4\\relax\n \\@afterindenttrue\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa <\\z@ \\@tempskipa -\\@tempskipa \\fi\n \\if@nobreak \\everypar{}\\else\n \\addpenalty{\\@secpenalty}\\addvspace{\\@tempskipa}\\fi \\@ifstar\n {\\@ssect{#3}{#4}{#5}{#6}}{\\@dblarg{\\@sict{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}{#5}{#6}}}}\n\n\\def\\@sict#1#2#3#4#5#6[#7]#8{\\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth\n \\def\\@svsec{}\\else\n \\refstepcounter{#1}\\edef\\@svsec{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}\\fi\n \\@tempskipa #5\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n \\begingroup #6\\relax\n \\@hangfrom{\\hskip #3\\relax\\@svsec.~}{\\interlinepenalty \\@M #8\\par}\n \\endgroup\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}\\addcontentsline\n {toc}{#1}{\\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}\\fi\n #7}\\else\n \\def\\@svsechd{#6\\hskip #3\\@svsec #8\\csname #1mark\\endcsname\n {#7}\\addcontentsline\n {toc}{#1}{\\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}\\fi\n #7}}\\fi\n \\@xsect{#5}}\n\n\\def\\@sect#1#2#3#4#5#6[#7]#8{\\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth\n \\def\\@svsec{}\\else\n \\refstepcounter{#1}\\edef\\@svsec{\\csname the#1\\endcsname\\hskip 0.4em }\\fi\n \\@tempskipa #5\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n \\begingroup #6\\relax\n \\@hangfrom{\\hskip #3\\relax\\@svsec}{\\interlinepenalty \\@M #8\\par}\n \\endgroup\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}\\addcontentsline\n {toc}{#1}{\\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}\\fi\n #7}\\else\n \\def\\@svsechd{#6\\hskip #3\\@svsec #8\\csname #1mark\\endcsname\n {#7}\\addcontentsline\n {toc}{#1}{\\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}\\fi\n #7}}\\fi\n \\@xsect{#5}}\n\n% section headings with less space above and below them\n\\def\\thesection {\\arabic{section}}\n\\def\\thesubsection {\\thesection.\\arabic{subsection}}\n\\def\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}{-0.12in}{0.02in}\n {\\large\\bf\\raggedright}}\n\\def\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}{-0.10in}{0.01in}\n {\\normalsize\\bf\\raggedright}}\n\\def\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}{-0.08in}{0.01in}\n {\\normalsize\\sc\\raggedright}}\n\\def\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}{1.5ex plus\n 0.5ex minus .2ex}{-1em}{\\normalsize\\bf}}\n\\def\\subparagraph{\\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\\z@}{1.5ex plus\n 0.5ex minus .2ex}{-1em}{\\normalsize\\bf}}\n\n% Footnotes\n\\footnotesep 6.65pt %\n\\skip\\footins 9pt\n\\def\\footnoterule{\\kern-3pt \\hrule width 0.8in \\kern 2.6pt }\n\\setcounter{footnote}{0}\n\n% Lists and paragraphs\n\\parindent 0pt\n\\topsep 4pt plus 1pt minus 2pt\n\\partopsep 1pt plus 0.5pt minus 0.5pt\n\\itemsep 2pt plus 1pt minus 0.5pt\n\\parsep 2pt plus 1pt minus 0.5pt\n\\parskip 6pt\n\n\\leftmargin 2em \\leftmargini\\leftmargin \\leftmarginii 2em\n\\leftmarginiii 1.5em \\leftmarginiv 1.0em \\leftmarginv .5em\n\\leftmarginvi .5em\n\\labelwidth\\leftmargini\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep \\labelsep 5pt\n\n\\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini}\n\\def\\@listii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginii\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 2pt plus 1pt minus 0.5pt\n \\parsep 1pt plus 0.5pt minus 0.5pt\n \\itemsep \\parsep}\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiii\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 1pt plus 0.5pt minus 0.5pt\n \\parsep \\z@ \\partopsep 0.5pt plus 0pt minus 0.5pt\n \\itemsep \\topsep}\n\\def\\@listiv{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiv\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listv{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginv\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listvi{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginvi\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginvi\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\n\\abovedisplayskip 7pt plus2pt minus5pt%\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus3pt%\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 4pt plus3pt minus3pt%\n\n% Less leading in most fonts (due to the narrow columns)\n% The choices were between 1-pt and 1.5-pt leading\n\\def\\@normalsize{\\@setsize\\normalsize{11pt}\\xpt\\@xpt}\n\\def\\small{\\@setsize\\small{10pt}\\ixpt\\@ixpt}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setsize\\footnotesize{10pt}\\ixpt\\@ixpt}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setsize\\scriptsize{8pt}\\viipt\\@viipt}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setsize\\tiny{7pt}\\vipt\\@vipt}\n\\def\\large{\\@setsize\\large{14pt}\\xiipt\\@xiipt}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setsize\\Large{16pt}\\xivpt\\@xivpt}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setsize\\LARGE{20pt}\\xviipt\\@xviipt}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setsize\\huge{23pt}\\xxpt\\@xxpt}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setsize\\Huge{28pt}\\xxvpt\\@xxvpt}\n\n% Revised formatting for figure captions and table titles.\n\\captionsetup{\n skip=0.1in,\n font=small,\n labelfont={it,small},\n labelsep=period\n}\n\\captionsetup[table]{position=above}\n\\captionsetup[figure]{position=below}\n\n\\def\\fnum@figure{Figure \\thefigure}\n\\def\\fnum@table{Table \\thetable}\n\n% Strut macros for skipping spaces above and below text in tables.\n\\def\\abovestrut#1{\\rule[0in]{0in}{#1}\\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\belowstrut#1{\\rule[-#1]{0in}{#1}\\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\abovespace{\\abovestrut{0.20in}}\n\\def\\aroundspace{\\abovestrut{0.20in}\\belowstrut{0.10in}}\n\\def\\belowspace{\\belowstrut{0.10in}}\n\n% Various personal itemization commands.\n\\def\\texitem#1{\\par\\noindent\\hangindent 12pt\n \\hbox to 12pt {\\hss #1 ~}\\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\icmlitem{\\texitem{$\\bullet$}}\n\n% To comment out multiple lines of text.\n\\long\\def\\comment#1{}\n\n%% Line counter (not in final version). Adapted from NIPS style file by Christoph Sawade\n\n% Vertical Ruler\n% This code is, largely, from the CVPR 2010 conference style file\n% ----- define vruler\n\\makeatletter\n\\newbox\\icmlrulerbox\n\\newcount\\icmlrulercount\n\\newdimen\\icmlruleroffset\n\\newdimen\\cv@lineheight\n\\newdimen\\cv@boxheight\n\\newbox\\cv@tmpbox\n\\newcount\\cv@refno\n\\newcount\\cv@tot\n% NUMBER with left flushed zeros \\fillzeros[<WIDTH>]<NUMBER>\n\\newcount\\cv@tmpc@ \\newcount\\cv@tmpc\n\\def\\fillzeros[#1]#2{\\cv@tmpc@=#2\\relax\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@<0\\cv@tmpc@=-\\cv@tmpc@\\fi\n \\cv@tmpc=1 %\n \\loop\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@<10 \\else \\divide\\cv@tmpc@ by 10 \\advance\\cv@tmpc by 1 \\fi\n \\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@=10\\relax\\cv@tmpc@=11\\relax\\fi \\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@>10 \\repeat\n \\ifnum#2<0\\advance\\cv@tmpc1\\relax-\\fi\n \\loop\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc<#1\\relax0\\advance\\cv@tmpc1\\relax\\fi \\ifnum\\cv@tmpc<#1 \\repeat\n \\cv@tmpc@=#2\\relax\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@<0\\cv@tmpc@=-\\cv@tmpc@\\fi \\relax\\the\\cv@tmpc@}%\n% \\makevruler[<SCALE>][<INITIAL_COUNT>][<STEP>][<DIGITS>][<HEIGHT>]\n\\def\\makevruler[#1][#2][#3][#4][#5]{\n \\begingroup\\offinterlineskip\n \\textheight=#5\\vbadness=10000\\vfuzz=120ex\\overfullrule=0pt%\n \\global\\setbox\\icmlrulerbox=\\vbox to \\textheight{%\n {\n \\parskip=0pt\\hfuzz=150em\\cv@boxheight=\\textheight\n \\cv@lineheight=#1\\global\\icmlrulercount=#2%\n \\cv@tot\\cv@boxheight\\divide\\cv@tot\\cv@lineheight\\advance\\cv@tot2%\n \\cv@refno1\\vskip-\\cv@lineheight\\vskip1ex%\n \\loop\\setbox\\cv@tmpbox=\\hbox to0cm{\\hfil {\\hfil\\fillzeros[#4]\\icmlrulercount}}%\n \\ht\\cv@tmpbox\\cv@lineheight\\dp\\cv@tmpbox0pt\\box\\cv@tmpbox\\break\n \\advance\\cv@refno1\\global\\advance\\icmlrulercount#3\\relax\n \\ifnum\\cv@refno<\\cv@tot\\repeat\n }\n }\n \\endgroup\n}%\n\\makeatother\n% ----- end of vruler\n\n% \\makevruler[<SCALE>][<INITIAL_COUNT>][<STEP>][<DIGITS>][<HEIGHT>]\n\\def\\icmlruler#1{\\makevruler[12pt][#1][1][3][\\textheight]\\usebox{\\icmlrulerbox}}\n\\AddToShipoutPicture{%\n \\icmlruleroffset=\\textheight\n \\advance\\icmlruleroffset by 5.2pt % top margin\n \\color[rgb]{.7,.7,.7}\n \\ificmlshowauthors\\else\n \\AtTextUpperLeft{%\n \\put(\\LenToUnit{-35pt},\\LenToUnit{-\\icmlruleroffset}){%left ruler\n \\icmlruler{\\icmlrulercount}}\n %\\put(\\LenToUnit{1.04\\textwidth},\\LenToUnit{-\\icmlruleroffset}){%right ruler\n % \\icmlruler{\\icmlrulercount}}\n }\n \\fi\n}\n\\endinput\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: reference.bib\n================================================\n@inproceedings{gorski2025integratingexpertknowledgelogical,\n title={Integrating Expert Knowledge into Logical Programs via LLMs},\n author={G{\\'o}rski, Franciszek and Wysocki, Oskar and Valentino, Marco and Freitas, Andre},\n booktitle={arXiv Preprint},\n year={2025},\n doi={10.48550/arXiv.2502.12275}\n}\n\n@misc{lpi,\nauthor={Yang, Aidan Z.H. and Takashima, Yoshiki and Paulsen, Brandon and Dodds, Josiah and Kroening, Daniel},\ntitle={VERT: Verified Equivalent Rust Transpilation with Large Language Models as Few-Shot Learners}, year={2024}, url={https://arxiv.org/html/2404.18852v2}}\n\n@article{choi2025debate,\n title={Debate or vote: Which yields better decisions in multi-agent large language models?},\n author={Choi, Hyeong Kyu and Zhu, Xiaojin and Li, Sharon},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.17536},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{chen2016xgboost,\n title={{XGBoost}: A Scalable Tree Boosting System},\n author={Chen, Tianqi and Guestrin, Carlos},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining},\n pages={785--794},\n year={2016},\n doi={10.1145/2939672.2939785}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{ke2017lightgbm,\n title={{LightGBM}: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree},\n author={Ke, Guolin and Meng, Qi and Finley, Thomas and Wang, Taifeng and Chen, Wei and Ma, Weidong and Ye, Qiwei and Liu, Tie-Yan},\n booktitle={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={30},\n pages={3146--3154},\n year={2017}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{grinsztajn2022tree,\n title={Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on typical tabular data?},\n author={Grinsztajn, L{\\'e}o and Oyallon, Edouard and Varoquaux, Ga{\\\"e}l},\n booktitle={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={35},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{breiman2001random,\n title={Random Forests},\n author={Breiman, Leo},\n journal={Machine Learning},\n volume={45},\n number={1},\n pages={5--32},\n year={2001},\n doi={10.1023/A:1010933404324}\n}\n\n@article{thorpe2016introduction,\n title={Introduction to the sampling designs of the {National Ecological Observatory Network Terrestrial Observation System}},\n author={Thorpe, Andrea S. and Barnett, David T. and Elmendorf, Sarah C. and Hinckley, Eve-Lyn S. and Hoekman, David and Jones, Katherine D. and LeVan, Katherine E. and Meier, Courtney L. and Stanish, Lee F. and Thibault, Katherine M.},\n journal={Ecosphere},\n volume={7},\n number={12},\n pages={e01627},\n year={2016},\n doi={10.1002/ecs2.1627}\n}\n\n@article{duncanson2015importance,\n title={The importance of spatial detail: Assessing the utility of individual crown information and scaling approaches for lidar-based biomass density estimation},\n author={Duncanson, Laura I. and Dubayah, Ralph O. and Cook, Bruce D. and Rosette, J. and Parker, G.},\n journal={Remote Sensing of Environment},\n volume={168},\n pages={102--112},\n year={2015},\n doi={10.1016/j.rse.2015.06.021}\n}\n\n@article{pau2022poor,\n title={Poor relationships between {NEON Airborne Observation Platform} data and field-based vegetation traits at a mesic grassland},\n author={Pau, Stephanie and Dee, Laura E. and Bahlai, Christie A. and Fromm, Emma and Key, Kristina J.},\n journal={Ecology},\n volume={103},\n number={2},\n pages={e3590},\n year={2022},\n doi={10.1002/ecy.3590}\n}\n\n@article{chawla2002smote,\n title={{SMOTE}: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique},\n author={Chawla, N. V. and Bowyer, K. W. and Hall, L. O. and Kegelmeyer, W. P.},\n journal={Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research},\n volume={16},\n pages={321--357},\n year={2002},\n doi={10.1613/jair.953}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{lin2017focal,\n title={Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection},\n author={Lin, Tsung-Yi and Goyal, Priya and Girshick, Ross and He, Kaiming and Doll{\\'a}r, Piotr},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)},\n pages={2999--3007},\n year={2017},\n doi={10.1109/ICCV.2017.324}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{qi2017pointnet,\n title={{PointNet}: Deep Learning on Point Sets for {3D} Classification and Segmentation},\n author={Qi, Charles R. and Su, Hao and Mo, Kaichun and Guibas, Leonidas J.},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n pages={77--85},\n year={2017},\n doi={10.1109/CVPR.2017.16}\n}\n\n@article{hollmann2025tabpfn,\n title={Accurate predictions on small data with a tabular foundation model},\n author={Hollmann, Noah and M{\\\"u}ller, Samuel and Purucker, Lennart and Krishnakumar, Arjun and K{\\\"o}rfer, Max and Hoo, Shi Bin and Schirrmeister, Robin Tibor and Hutter, Frank},\n journal={Nature},\n volume={637},\n number={8045},\n pages={319--326},\n year={2025},\n doi={10.1038/s41586-024-08328-6}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{lee2013pseudo,\n title={Pseudo-Label: The Simple and Efficient Semi-Supervised Learning Method for Deep Neural Networks},\n author={Lee, Dong-Hyun},\n booktitle={Workshop on Challenges in Representation Learning, ICML},\n year={2013}\n}\n\n@article{weng2025vlmremotesensing,\n title={Vision-Language Modeling Meets Remote Sensing: Models, Datasets and Perspectives},\n author={Weng, Xinxin and Pang, Chao and Xia, Gui-Song},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14361},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{wei2022chain,\ntitle={Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models},\n author={Wei, Jason and Wang, Xuezhi and Schuurmans, Dale and Bosma, Maarten and Ichter, Brian and Xia, Fei and Chi, Ed and Le, Quoc V and Zhou, Denny},\n booktitle={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={35},\n pages={24824--24837},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{TOMPALSKI2014167,\ntitle = {Simulating the impacts of error in species and height upon tree volume derived from airborne laser scanning data},\njournal = {Forest Ecology and Management},\nvolume = {327},\npages = {167-177},\nyear = {2014},\nissn = {0378-1127},\ndoi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.011},\nurl = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112714002916},\nauthor = {Piotr Tompalski and Nicholas C. Coops and Joanne C. White and Michael A. Wulder},\n}\n\n@Article{essd-17-965-2025,\nAUTHOR = {Friedlingstein, P. and O'Sullivan, M. and Jones, M. W. and others},\nTITLE = {Global Carbon Budget 2024},\nJOURNAL = {Earth System Science Data},\nVOLUME = {17},\nYEAR = {2025},\nNUMBER = {3},\nPAGES = {965--1039},\nURL = {https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/17/965/2025/},\nDOI = {10.5194/essd-17-965-2025}\n}\n\n@article{WANG2019132,\ntitle = {Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – A comparison study of tree height estimates from field measurement, airborne laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning in a boreal forest},\njournal = {ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing},\nvolume = {147},\npages = {132-145},\nyear = {2019},\nissn = {0924-2716},\ndoi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.11.008},\nurl = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271618303046},\nauthor = {Yunsheng Wang and Matti Lehtomäki and Xinlian Liang and Jiri Pyörälä and Antero Kukko and Anttoni Jaakkola and Jingbin Liu and Ziyi Feng and Ruizhi Chen and Juha Hyyppä},\n}\n\n\n@article{terrynGCB,\nauthor = {Terryn, Louise and Calders, Kim and Meunier, Félicien and Bauters, Marijn and Boeckx, Pascal and Brede, Benjamin and Burt, Andrew and Chave, Jerome and da Costa, Antonio Carlos Lola and D'hont, Barbara and Disney, Mathias and Jucker, Tommaso and Lau, Alvaro and Laurance, Susan G. W. and Maeda, Eduardo Eiji and Meir, Patrick and Krishna Moorthy, Sruthi M. and Nunes, Matheus Henrique and Shenkin, Alexander and Sibret, Thomas and Verhelst, Tom E. and Wilkes, Phil and Verbeeck, Hans},\ntitle = {New tree height allometries derived from terrestrial laser scanning reveal substantial discrepancies with forest inventory methods in tropical rainforests},\njournal = {Global Change Biology},\nvolume = {30},\nnumber = {8},\npages = {e17473},\nkeywords = {accuracy, forest inventory, terrestrial laser scanning, tree allometry, tree height, tropical rainforest},\ndoi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17473},\nurl = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gcb.17473},\neprint = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/gcb.17473},\nnote = {e17473 GCB-24-1584.R1},\nyear = {2024}\n}\n\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091177,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31977"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31977"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Neel Shah"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Neel Shah, Kazuya Koyama, Johannes Noller, Lanyang Yi"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Constraining dark energy with complementary probes of large-scale structure"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"19 pages + appendices and references, 14 figures"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"astro-ph.CO gr-qc"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"To observationally pin down the nature of dark energy, it is essential to consistently model cosmological perturbations in the presence of dark energy alongside the background expansion and constrain this joint theory space with a large array of complementary probes. Here, we achieve this by constraining a model in the Effective Field Theory of Dark Energy (EFTofDE) framework by supplementing probes of the expansion history with several probes of large-scale structure: redshift space distortions (RSD) from DESI DR1, $3\\times2$pt measurements from DES Y3, and the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect from cross-correlating CMB temperature anisotropies with galaxy number counts or CMB lensing. We demonstrate the complementarity of different probes which leads to strong improvements on constraints on DE perturbations. For our most constraining dataset combination that supplements CMB+BAO+SNe probes with DESI DR1 RSD, DES Y3 $3\\times2$pt and ISW cross-correlations between CMB temperature and galaxy counts, we find an improvement in the Figure of Merit (FoM) for the DE perturbation parameters $\\{c_B, c_M\\}$ by a factor of 2.69. We show the phenomenological implications of these constraints by mapping them to the present-day values of the phenomenological functions $\\{\\mu(z), \\Sigma(z)\\}$, where we see an FoM improvement by a factor of 3.37. We find a significant interdependence between the posteriors of $\\{w_0, w_a\\}$ and $\\{c_B, c_M\\}$, caused by the theoretical prior imposed by the gradient stability condition within the EFTofDE framework. Finally, we compute the significance of deviation from $\\Lambda$CM for the EFTofDE model when constrained with CMB+BAO+SNe datasets, finding it to be at 2.9$\\sigma$. This significance is nontrivially similar to the significance for the $w_0w_a$CDM model for the same dataset combination which we find to be 3.1$\\sigma$."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:17:50 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:17:50 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-02"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Shah","Neel",""],["Koyama","Kazuya",""],["Noller","Johannes",""],["Yi","Lanyang",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Shah\",\n \"Neel\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Koyama\",\n \"Kazuya\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Noller\",\n \"Johannes\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Yi\",\n \"Lanyang\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: DESI_RSD_EFT.bib\n================================================\n@article{Stolzner:2017ged,\n author = {St\\\"olzner, Benjamin and Cuoco, Alessandro and Lesgourgues, Julien and Bilicki, Maciej},\n title = \"{Updated tomographic analysis of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect and implications for dark energy}\",\n eprint = \"1710.03238\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"TTK-17-32\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.97.063506\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"97\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"063506\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n@article{Bilicki:2013sza,\n author = \"Bilicki, Maciej and Jarrett, Thomas H. and Peacock, John A. and Cluver, Michelle E. and Steward, Louise\",\n title = \"{2MASS Photometric Redshift catalog: a comprehensive three-dimensional census of the whole sky}\",\n eprint = \"1311.5246\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/0067-0049/210/1/9\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J. Suppl.\",\n volume = \"210\",\n pages = \"9\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n@article{Bilicki:2016irk,\n author = \"Bilicki, M. and others\",\n title = \"{WISE x SuperCOSMOS photometric redshift catalog: 20 million galaxies over 3pi steradians}\",\n eprint = \"1607.01182\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.3847/0067-0049/225/1/5\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J. Suppl.\",\n volume = \"225\",\n pages = \"5\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n@article{Beck_2016,\n\tdoi = {10.1093/mnras/stw1009},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fmnras%2Fstw1009},\n\tyear = 2016,\n\tpublisher = \"Oxford University Press (OUP)\",\n\tvolume = \"460\",\n\tnumber = \"2\",\n\tpages = \"1371--1381\",\n\tauthor = {Robert Beck and Laszlo Dobos and Tamas Budavari and Alexander S. Szalay and Istvan Csabai},\n\ttitle = {Photometric redshifts for the SDSS Data Release 12},\n\tjournal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society}\n}\n\n@article{Richards:2008eq,\n author = \"Richards, Gordon T. and Myers, Adam D. and Gray, Alexander G. and Riegel, Ryan N. and Nichol, Robert C. and Brunner, Robert J. and Szalay, Alexander S. and Schneider, Donald P. and Anderson, Scott F.\",\n title = \"{Efficient Photometric Selection of Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: II. \\textasciitilde{}1,000,000 Quasars from Data Release Six}\",\n eprint = \"0809.3952\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1088/0067-0049/180/1/67\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J. Suppl.\",\n volume = \"180\",\n pages = \"67--83\",\n year = \"2009\"\n}\n@article{Condon:1998iy,\n author = \"Condon, James J. and Cotton, W. D. and Greisen, E. W. and Yin, Q. F. and Perley, R. A. and Taylor, G. B. and Broderick, J. J.\",\n title = \"{The NRAO VLA Sky survey}\",\n doi = \"10.1086/300337\",\n journal = \"Astron. J.\",\n volume = \"115\",\n pages = \"1693--1716\",\n year = \"1998\"\n}\n\n@article{Hollowood:2015elj,\n author = \"Hollowood, Timothy J. and Shore, Graham M.\",\n title = \"{Causality Violation, Gravitational Shockwaves and UV Completion}\",\n eprint = \"1512.04952\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP03(2016)129\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"03\",\n pages = \"129\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n@article{Camanho:2014apa,\n author = \"Camanho, Xian O. and Edelstein, Jose D. and Maldacena, Juan and Zhiboedov, Alexander\",\n title = \"{Causality Constraints on Corrections to the Graviton Three-Point Coupling}\",\n eprint = \"1407.5597\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP02(2016)020\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"02\",\n pages = \"020\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n@article{Gao:2000ga,\n author = \"Gao, Sijie and Wald, Robert M.\",\n title = \"{Theorems on gravitational time delay and related issues}\",\n eprint = \"gr-qc/0007021\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1088/0264-9381/17/24/305\",\n journal = \"Class. Quant. Grav.\",\n volume = \"17\",\n pages = \"4999--5008\",\n year = \"2000\"\n}\n\n@article{deRham:2021bll,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Tolley, Andrew J. and Zhang, Jun\",\n title = \"{Causality Constraints on Gravitational Effective Field Theories}\",\n eprint = \"2112.05054\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n reportNumber = \"Imperial/TP/2021/CdR/4\",\n month = \"12\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Chen:2021bvg,\n author = \"Chen, Calvin Y. -R. and de Rham, Claudia and Margalit, Aoibheann and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{A cautionary case of casual causality}\",\n eprint = \"2112.05031\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"Imperial/TP/2021/CC/1\",\n month = \"12\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n%%% Beginning of Positivity refs\n\n@article{Haldar:2021rri,\n author = \"Haldar, Parthiv and Sinha, Aninda and Zahed, Ahmadullah\",\n title = \"{Quantum field theory and the Bieberbach conjecture}\",\n eprint = \"2103.12108\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.21468/SciPostPhys.11.1.002\",\n journal = \"SciPost Phys.\",\n volume = \"11\",\n pages = \"002\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Raman:2021pkf,\n author = \"Raman, Prashanth and Sinha, Aninda\",\n title = \"{QFT, EFT and GFT}\",\n eprint = \"2107.06559\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n month = \"7\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Li:2021cjv,\n author = \"Li, Xu and Yang, Chengjie and Xu, Hao and Zhang, Cen and Zhou, Shuang-Yong\",\n title = \"{Positivity in Multi-Field EFTs}\",\n eprint = \"2101.01191\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"USTC-ICTS/PCFT-21-01\",\n month = \"1\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Du:2021byy,\n author = \"Du, Zong-Zhe and Zhang, Cen and Zhou, Shuang-Yong\",\n title = \"{Triple crossing positivity bounds for multi-field theories}\",\n eprint = \"2111.01169\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"USTC-ICTS/PCFT-21-42\",\n month = \"11\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Trott:2020ebl,\n author = \"Trott, Timothy\",\n title = \"{Causality, Unitarity and Symmetry in Effective Field Theory}\",\n eprint = \"2011.10058\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP07(2021)143\",\n month = \"11\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n@article{Li:2021lpe,\n author = \"Li, Xu and Xu, Hao and Yang, Chengjie and Zhang, Cen and Zhou, Shuang-Yong\",\n title = \"{Positivity in Multifield Effective Field Theories}\",\n eprint = \"2101.01191\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"USTC-ICTS/PCFT-21-01\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.121601\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"127\",\n number = \"12\",\n pages = \"121601\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n@article{deRham:2017avq,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Melville, Scott and Tolley, Andrew J. and Zhou, Shuang-Yong\",\n title = \"{Positivity bounds for scalar field theories}\",\n eprint = \"1702.06134\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.96.081702\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"96\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"081702\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n@article{Pham:1985cr,\n author = \"Pham, T. N. and Truong, Tran N.\",\n title = \"{Evaluation of the Derivative Quartic Terms of the Meson Chiral Lagrangian From Forward Dispersion Relation}\",\n reportNumber = \"Print-85-0588 (ECOLE POLY)\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.31.3027\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"31\",\n pages = \"3027\",\n year = \"1985\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Ananthanarayan:1994hf,\n author = \"Ananthanarayan, B. and Toublan, D. and Wanders, G.\",\n title = \"{Consistency of the chiral pion pion scattering amplitudes with axiomatic constraints}\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/9410302\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"UNIL-TP-4-94\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.51.1093\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"51\",\n pages = \"1093--1100\",\n year = \"1995\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Pennington:1994kc,\n author = \"Pennington, M. R. and Portoles, J.\",\n title = \"{The Chiral Lagrangian parameters, l1, l2, are determined by the rho resonance}\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/9409426\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"DTP-94-54\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0370-2693(94)01551-M\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett. B\",\n volume = \"344\",\n pages = \"399--406\",\n year = \"1995\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Distler:2006if,\n author = \"Distler, Jacques and Grinstein, Benjamin and Porto, Rafael A. and Rothstein, Ira Z.\",\n title = \"{Falsifying Models of New Physics via WW Scattering}\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/0604255\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"UCSD-PTH-06-06, UTTTG-06-06, CMUHEP-06-07\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.041601\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"98\",\n pages = \"041601\",\n year = \"2007\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Vecchi:2007na,\n author = \"Vecchi, Luca\",\n title = \"{Causal versus analytic constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings}\",\n eprint = \"0704.1900\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/054\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"11\",\n pages = \"054\",\n year = \"2007\"\n}\n\n@article{Gsponer:2021obj,\n author = \"Gsponer, Rafaela and Noller, Johannes\",\n title = \"{Tachyonic stability priors for dark energy}\",\n eprint = \"2107.01044\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.105.064002\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"105\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"064002\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Seraille:2024beb,\n author = \"Seraille, Emeric and Noller, Johannes and Sherwin, Blake D.\",\n title = \"{Constraining dark energy with the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect}\",\n eprint = \"2401.06221\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n month = \"1\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Bellazzini:2017bkb,\n author = \"Bellazzini, Brando and Riva, Francesco and Serra, Javi and Sgarlata, Francesco\",\n title = \"{The other effective fermion compositeness}\",\n eprint = \"1706.03070\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-TH-2017-119\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP11(2017)020\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"11\",\n pages = \"020\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Bellazzini:2018paj,\n author = \"Bellazzini, Brando and Riva, Francesco\",\n title = \"{New phenomenological and theoretical perspective on anomalous ZZ and Z\\ensuremath{\\gamma} processes}\",\n eprint = \"1806.09640\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.98.095021\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"98\",\n number = \"9\",\n pages = \"095021\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Zhang:2018shp,\n author = \"Zhang, Cen and Zhou, Shuang-Yong\",\n title = \"{Positivity bounds on vector boson scattering at the LHC}\",\n eprint = \"1808.00010\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"USTC-ICTS-18-13\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.100.095003\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"100\",\n number = \"9\",\n pages = \"095003\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Bi:2019phv,\n author = \"Bi, Qi and Zhang, Cen and Zhou, Shuang-Yong\",\n title = \"{Positivity constraints on aQGC: carving out the physical parameter space}\",\n eprint = \"1902.08977\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"USTC-ICTS-19-01\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP06(2019)137\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n pages = \"137\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Remmen:2019cyz,\n author = \"Remmen, Grant N. and Rodd, Nicholas L.\",\n title = \"{Consistency of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory}\",\n eprint = \"1908.09845\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP12(2019)032\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"12\",\n pages = \"032\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Englert:2019zmt,\n author = \"Englert, Christoph and Giudice, Gian F. and Greljo, Admir and Mccullough, Matthew\",\n title = \"{The $\\hat{H}$-Parameter: An Oblique Higgs View}\",\n eprint = \"1903.07725\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-TH-2019-027, DAMTP-2019-8\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP09(2019)041\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"09\",\n pages = \"041\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Yamashita:2020gtt,\n author = \"Yamashita, Kimiko and Zhang, Cen and Zhou, Shuang-Yong\",\n title = \"{Elastic positivity vs extremal positivity bounds in SMEFT: a case study in transversal electroweak gauge-boson scatterings}\",\n eprint = \"2009.04490\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"USTC-ICTS/PCFT-20-29\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP01(2021)095\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"01\",\n pages = \"095\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Remmen:2020vts,\n author = \"Remmen, Grant N. and Rodd, Nicholas L.\",\n title = \"{Flavor Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity}\",\n eprint = \"2004.02885\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.149901\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"125\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"081601\",\n year = \"2020\",\n note = \"[Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 127, 149901 (2021)]\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Bonnefoy:2020yee,\n author = \"Bonnefoy, Quentin and Gendy, Emanuele and Grojean, Christophe\",\n title = \"{Positivity bounds on Minimal Flavor Violation}\",\n eprint = \"2011.12855\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"DESY-20-201, DESY 20-201\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP04(2021)115\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"04\",\n pages = \"115\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Chala:2021wpj,\n author = \"Chala, Mikael and Santiago, Jose\",\n title = \"{Positivity bounds in the Standard Model effective field theory beyond tree level}\",\n eprint = \"2110.01624\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n month = \"10\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Bellazzini:2015cra,\n author = \"Bellazzini, Brando and Cheung, Clifford and Remmen, Grant N.\",\n title = \"{Quantum Gravity Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity}\",\n eprint = \"1509.00851\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"CALT-TH-2015-044, SACLAY-T15-161\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.93.064076\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"93\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"064076\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Cheung:2016wjt,\n author = \"Cheung, Clifford and Remmen, Grant N.\",\n title = \"{Positivity of Curvature-Squared Corrections in Gravity}\",\n eprint = \"1608.02942\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"CALT-TH-2016-018\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.051601\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"118\",\n number = \"5\",\n pages = \"051601\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Camanho:2014apa,\n author = \"Camanho, Xian O. and Edelstein, Jose D. and Maldacena, Juan and Zhiboedov, Alexander\",\n title = \"{Causality Constraints on Corrections to the Graviton Three-Point Coupling}\",\n eprint = \"1407.5597\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP02(2016)020\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"02\",\n pages = \"020\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Gruzinov:2006ie,\n author = \"Gruzinov, A. and Kleban, M.\",\n title = \"{Causality Constrains Higher Curvature Corrections to Gravity}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0612015\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1088/0264-9381/24/13/N02\",\n journal = \"Class. Quant. Grav.\",\n volume = \"24\",\n pages = \"3521--3524\",\n year = \"2007\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Cheung:2016yqr,\n author = \"Cheung, Clifford and Remmen, Grant N.\",\n title = \"{Positive Signs in Massive Gravity}\",\n eprint = \"1601.04068\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"CALT-TH-2015-062\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP04(2016)002\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"04\",\n pages = \"002\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Bonifacio:2016wcb,\n author = \"Bonifacio, James and Hinterbichler, Kurt and Rosen, Rachel A.\",\n title = \"{Positivity constraints for pseudolinear massive spin-2 and vector Galileons}\",\n eprint = \"1607.06084\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.94.104001\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"94\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"104001\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Bellazzini:2017fep,\n author = \"Bellazzini, Brando and Riva, Francesco and Serra, Javi and Sgarlata, Francesco\",\n title = \"{Beyond Positivity Bounds and the Fate of Massive Gravity}\",\n eprint = \"1710.02539\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-TH-2017-201\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.161101\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"120\",\n number = \"16\",\n pages = \"161101\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n\n@article{deRham:2017xox,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Melville, Scott and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{Improved Positivity Bounds and Massive Gravity}\",\n eprint = \"1710.09611\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IMPERIAL-TP-2017-AT-04\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP04(2018)083\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"04\",\n pages = \"083\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n\n@article{deRham:2018qqo,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Melville, Scott and Tolley, Andrew J. and Zhou, Shuang-Yong\",\n title = \"{Positivity Bounds for Massive Spin-1 and Spin-2 Fields}\",\n eprint = \"1804.10624\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"Imperial/TP/2018/CdR/01, IMPERIAL-TP-2018-CDR-01\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP03(2019)182\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"03\",\n pages = \"182\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Alberte:2019xfh,\n author = \"Alberte, Lasma and de Rham, Claudia and Momeni, Arshia and Rumbutis, Justinas and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{Positivity Constraints on Interacting Spin-2 Fields}\",\n eprint = \"1910.11799\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"Imperial/TP/2019/LA/03\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP03(2020)097\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"03\",\n pages = \"097\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Alberte:2019zhd,\n author = \"Alberte, Lasma and de Rham, Claudia and Momeni, Arshia and Rumbutis, Justinas and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{Positivity Constraints on Interacting Pseudo-Linear Spin-2 Fields}\",\n eprint = \"1912.10018\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"Imperial/TP/2019/LA/04\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP07(2020)121\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"07\",\n pages = \"121\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Wang:2020xlt,\n author = \"Wang, Zi-Yue and Zhang, Cen and Zhou, Shuang-Yong\",\n title = \"{Generalized elastic positivity bounds on interacting massive spin-2 theories}\",\n eprint = \"2011.05190\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP04(2021)217\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"04\",\n pages = \"217\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Hinterbichler:2017qyt,\n author = \"Hinterbichler, Kurt and Joyce, Austin and Rosen, Rachel A.\",\n title = \"{Massive Spin-2 Scattering and Asymptotic Superluminality}\",\n eprint = \"1708.05716\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP03(2018)051\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"03\",\n pages = \"051\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Bonifacio:2018vzv,\n author = \"Bonifacio, James and Hinterbichler, Kurt\",\n title = \"{Bounds on Amplitudes in Effective Theories with Massive Spinning Particles}\",\n eprint = \"1804.08686\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.98.045003\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"98\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"045003\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Bellazzini:2019bzh,\n author = \"Bellazzini, Brando and Riva, Francesco and Serra, Javi and Sgarlata, Francesco\",\n title = \"{Massive Higher Spins: Effective Theory and Consistency}\",\n eprint = \"1903.08664\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP10(2019)189\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"10\",\n pages = \"189\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Nicolis:2009qm,\n author = \"Nicolis, Alberto and Rattazzi, Riccardo and Trincherini, Enrico\",\n title = \"{Energy's and amplitudes' positivity}\",\n eprint = \"0912.4258\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP05(2010)095\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"095\",\n year = \"2010\",\n note = \"[Erratum: JHEP 11, 128 (2011)]\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Elvang:2012st,\n author = \"Elvang, Henriette and Freedman, Daniel Z. and Hung, Ling-Yan and Kiermaier, Michael and Myers, Robert C. and Theisen, Stefan\",\n title = \"{On renormalization group flows and the a-theorem in 6d}\",\n eprint = \"1205.3994\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"MCTP-12-09, MIT-CTP-4362, PUPT-2413, SU-ITP-12-14\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP10(2012)011\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"10\",\n pages = \"011\",\n year = \"2012\"\n}\n\n\n@article{deRham:2017imi,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Melville, Scott and Tolley, Andrew J. and Zhou, Shuang-Yong\",\n title = \"{Massive Galileon Positivity Bounds}\",\n eprint = \"1702.08577\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP09(2017)072\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"09\",\n pages = \"072\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Chandrasekaran:2018qmx,\n author = \"Chandrasekaran, Venkatesa and Remmen, Grant N. and Shahbazi-Moghaddam, Arvin\",\n title = \"{Higher-Point Positivity}\",\n eprint = \"1804.03153\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP11(2018)015\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"11\",\n pages = \"015\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Herrero-Valea:2019hde,\n author = \"Herrero-Valea, Mario and Timiryasov, Inar and Tokareva, Anna\",\n title = \"{To Positivity and Beyond, where Higgs-Dilaton Inflation has never gone before}\",\n eprint = \"1905.08816\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"INR-TH-2019-011\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2019/11/042\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"11\",\n pages = \"042\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Cheung:2014ega,\n author = \"Cheung, Clifford and Remmen, Grant N.\",\n title = \"{Infrared Consistency and the Weak Gravity Conjecture}\",\n eprint = \"1407.7865\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"CALT-TH-2014-146\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP12(2014)087\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"12\",\n pages = \"087\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Cheung:2018cwt,\n author = \"Cheung, Clifford and Liu, Junyu and Remmen, Grant N.\",\n title = \"{Proof of the Weak Gravity Conjecture from Black Hole Entropy}\",\n eprint = \"1801.08546\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"CALT-TH-2018-007\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP10(2018)004\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"10\",\n pages = \"004\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Hamada:2018dde,\n author = \"Hamada, Yuta and Noumi, Toshifumi and Shiu, Gary\",\n title = \"{Weak Gravity Conjecture from Unitarity and Causality}\",\n eprint = \"1810.03637\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"CCTP-2018-12, ITCP-IPP 2018/9, KOBE-COSMO-18-08, MAD-TH-18-05\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.051601\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"123\",\n number = \"5\",\n pages = \"051601\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Cheung:2019cwi,\n author = \"Cheung, Clifford and Liu, Junyu and Remmen, Grant N.\",\n title = \"{Entropy Bounds on Effective Field Theory from Rotating Dyonic Black Holes}\",\n eprint = \"1903.09156\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"CALT-TH-2019-003\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.100.046003\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"100\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"046003\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Bellazzini:2019xts,\n author = \"Bellazzini, Brando and Lewandowski, Matthew and Serra, Javi\",\n title = \"{Positivity of Amplitudes, Weak Gravity Conjecture, and Modified Gravity}\",\n eprint = \"1902.03250\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.251103\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"123\",\n number = \"25\",\n pages = \"251103\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Charles:2019qqt,\n author = \"Charles, Anthony M.\",\n title = \"{The Weak Gravity Conjecture, RG Flows, and Supersymmetry}\",\n eprint = \"1906.07734\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n month = \"6\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Arkani-Hamed:2021ajd,\n author = \"Arkani-Hamed, Nima and Huang, Yu-tin and Liu, Jin-Yu and Remmen, Grant N.\",\n title = \"{Causality, Unitarity, and the Weak Gravity Conjecture}\",\n eprint = \"2109.13937\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n month = \"9\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Alberte:2020bdz,\n author = \"Alberte, Lasma and de Rham, Claudia and Jaitly, Sumer and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{QED positivity bounds}\",\n eprint = \"2012.05798\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"Imperial/TP/2020/LA/03\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.103.125020\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"103\",\n number = \"12\",\n pages = \"125020\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Alberte:2020jsk,\n author = \"Alberte, Lasma and de Rham, Claudia and Jaitly, Sumer and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{Positivity Bounds and the Massless Spin-2 Pole}\",\n eprint = \"2007.12667\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"Imperial/TP/2020/LA/02\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.102.125023\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"102\",\n number = \"12\",\n pages = \"125023\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Tokuda:2020mlf,\n author = \"Tokuda, Junsei and Aoki, Katsuki and Hirano, Shin'ichi\",\n title = \"{Gravitational positivity bounds}\",\n eprint = \"2007.15009\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"KOBE-COSMO-20-13, YITP-20-98\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP11(2020)054\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"11\",\n pages = \"054\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Herrero-Valea:2020wxz,\n author = \"Herrero-Valea, Mario and Santos-Garcia, Raquel and Tokareva, Anna\",\n title = \"{Massless positivity in graviton exchange}\",\n eprint = \"2011.11652\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"FTUAM-20-26, IFT-UAM/CSIC-20-162, INR-TH-2020-043\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.104.085022\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"104\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"085022\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Caron-Huot:2021rmr,\n author = \"Caron-Huot, Simon and Mazac, Dalimil and Rastelli, Leonardo and Simmons-Duffin, David\",\n title = \"{Sharp Boundaries for the Swampland}\",\n eprint = \"2102.08951\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/jhep07(2021)110\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"07\",\n pages = \"110\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Alberte:2021dnj,\n author = \"Alberte, Lasma and de Rham, Claudia and Jaitly, Sumer and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{Reverse Bootstrapping: IR lessons for UV physics}\",\n eprint = \"2111.09226\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"Imperial/TP/2021/LA/1\",\n month = \"11\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Bellazzini:2020cot,\n author = \"Bellazzini, Brando and Elias Mir\\'o, Joan and Rattazzi, Riccardo and Riembau, Marc and Riva, Francesco\",\n title = \"{Positive moments for scattering amplitudes}\",\n eprint = \"2011.00037\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.104.036006\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"104\",\n number = \"3\",\n pages = \"036006\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Tolley:2020gtv,\n author = \"Tolley, Andrew J. and Wang, Zi-Yue and Zhou, Shuang-Yong\",\n title = \"{New positivity bounds from full crossing symmetry}\",\n eprint = \"2011.02400\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP05(2021)255\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"255\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Caron-Huot:2020cmc,\n author = \"Caron-Huot, Simon and Van Duong, Vincent\",\n title = \"{Extremal Effective Field Theories}\",\n eprint = \"2011.02957\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP05(2021)280\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"280\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Sinha:2020win,\n author = \"Sinha, Aninda and Zahed, Ahmadullah\",\n title = \"{Crossing Symmetric Dispersion Relations in Quantum Field Theories}\",\n eprint = \"2012.04877\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.181601\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"126\",\n number = \"18\",\n pages = \"181601\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Arkani-Hamed:2020blm,\n author = \"Arkani-Hamed, Nima and Huang, Tzu-Chen and Huang, Yu-Tin\",\n title = \"{The EFT-Hedron}\",\n eprint = \"2012.15849\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"NCTS-TH/2014, CALT-TH 2020-061\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP05(2021)259\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"259\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Chiang:2021ziz,\n author = \"Chiang, Li-Yuan and Huang, Yu-tin and Li, Wei and Rodina, Laurentiu and Weng, He-Chen\",\n title = \"{Into the EFThedron and UV constraints from IR consistency}\",\n eprint = \"2105.02862\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n month = \"5\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Bellazzini:2016xrt,\n author = \"Bellazzini, Brando\",\n title = \"{Softness and amplitudes\\textquoteright{} positivity for spinning particles}\",\n eprint = \"1605.06111\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"SACLAY-T16-038\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP02(2017)034\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"02\",\n pages = \"034\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n\n@article{deRham:2017zjm,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Melville, Scott and Tolley, Andrew J. and Zhou, Shuang-Yong\",\n title = \"{UV complete me: Positivity Bounds for Particles with Spin}\",\n eprint = \"1706.02712\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP03(2018)011\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"03\",\n pages = \"011\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Remmen:2020uze,\n author = \"Remmen, Grant N. and Rodd, Nicholas L.\",\n title = \"{Signs, Spin, SMEFT: Positivity at Dimension Six}\",\n eprint = \"2010.04723\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n month = \"10\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Davighi:2021osh,\n author = \"Davighi, Joe and Melville, Scott and You, Tevong\",\n title = \"{Natural Selection Rules: New Positivity Bounds for Massive Spinning Particles}\",\n eprint = \"2108.06334\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-TH-2021-122\",\n month = \"8\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n%%% End of Positivity refs\n\n@article{Planck:2019nip,\n author = \"Aghanim, N. and others\",\n collaboration = \"Planck\",\n title = \"{Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods}\",\n eprint = \"1907.12875\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/201936386\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"641\",\n pages = \"A5\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Planck:2018vyg,\n author = \"Aghanim, N. and others\",\n collaboration = \"Planck\",\n title = \"{Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters}\",\n eprint = \"1807.06209\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/201833910\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"641\",\n pages = \"A6\",\n year = \"2020\",\n note = \"[Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]\"\n}\n\n@article{Planck:2018lbu,\n author = \"Aghanim, N. and others\",\n collaboration = \"Planck\",\n title = \"{Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing}\",\n eprint = \"1807.06210\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/201833886\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"641\",\n pages = \"A8\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Anderson:2012sa,\n author = \"Anderson, Lauren and others\",\n title = \"{The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Data Release 9 Spectroscopic Galaxy Sample}\",\n eprint = \"1203.6594\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22066.x\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"427\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"3435--3467\",\n year = \"2013\"\n}\n\n@article{Padmanabhan:2012hf,\n author = \"Padmanabhan, Nikhil and Xu, Xiaoying and Eisenstein, Daniel J. and Scalzo, Richard and Cuesta, Antonio J. and Mehta, Kushal T. and Kazin, Eyal\",\n title = \"{A 2 per cent distance to $z$=0.35 by reconstructing baryon acoustic oscillations - I. Methods and application to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey}\",\n eprint = \"1202.0090\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21888.x\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"427\",\n number = \"3\",\n pages = \"2132--2145\",\n year = \"2012\"\n}\n\n@article{Beutler:2011hx,\n author = \"Beutler, Florian and Blake, Chris and Colless, Matthew and Jones, D. Heath and Staveley-Smith, Lister and Campbell, Lachlan and Parker, Quentin and Saunders, Will and Watson, Fred\",\n title = \"{The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and the Local Hubble Constant}\",\n eprint = \"1106.3366\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19250.x\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"416\",\n pages = \"3017--3032\",\n year = \"2011\"\n}\n\n@article{Baumann:2011su,\n author = \"Baumann, Daniel and Green, Daniel\",\n title = \"{Equilateral Non-Gaussianity and New Physics on the\n Horizon}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1109\",\n year = \"2011\",\n pages = \"014\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2011/09/014\",\n eprint = \"1102.5343\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1102.5343;%%\"\n}\n@article{Baumann:2014cja,\n author = \"Baumann, Daniel and Green, Daniel and Porto, Rafael A.\",\n title = \"{B-modes and the Nature of Inflation}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1501\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"01\",\n pages = \"016\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2015/01/016\",\n eprint = \"1407.2621\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1407.2621;%%\"\n}\n@article{Wick:1962zz,\n author = \"Wick, G. C.\",\n title = \"{Angular momentum states for three relativistic particles}\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0003-4916(62)90059-3\",\n journal = \"Annals Phys.\",\n volume = \"18\",\n pages = \"65--80\",\n year = \"1962\"\n}\n\n@article{Davis:2021oce,\n author = \"Davis, Anne-Christine and Melville, Scott\",\n title = \"{Scalar Fields Near Compact Objects: Resummation versus UV Completion}\",\n eprint = \"2107.00010\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n month = \"6\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Aoki:2021ffc,\n author = \"Aoki, Katsuki and Mukohyama, Shinji and Namba, Ryo\",\n title = \"{Positivity vs. Lorentz-violation: an explicit example}\",\n eprint = \"2107.01755\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"YITP-21-70, RIKEN-iTHEMS-Report-21, IPMU21-0045\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/079\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"10\",\n pages = \"079\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Hinterbichler:2015pqa,\n author = \"Hinterbichler, Kurt and Joyce, Austin\",\n title = \"{Hidden symmetry of the Galileon}\",\n eprint = \"1501.07600\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.92.023503\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"92\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"023503\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n\n@article{Cheung:2014dqa,\n author = \"Cheung, Clifford and Kampf, Karol and Novotny, Jiri and Trnka, Jaroslav\",\n title = \"{Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits of Scattering Amplitudes}\",\n eprint = \"1412.4095\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"CALT-TH-2014-167\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.221602\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"114\",\n number = \"22\",\n pages = \"221602\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n\n@article{DES:2022ccp,\n author = \"Abbott, T. M. C. and others\",\n collaboration = \"DES\",\n title = \"{Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Constraints on extensions to \\ensuremath{\\Lambda}CDM with weak lensing and galaxy clustering}\",\n eprint = \"2207.05766\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-22-470-PPD\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.107.083504\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"107\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"083504\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{Riess:1998cb,\n author = \"Riess, Adam G. and others\",\n collaboration = \"Supernova Search Team\",\n title = \"{Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/9805201\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1086/300499\",\n journal = \"Astron. J.\",\n volume = \"116\",\n pages = \"1009--1038\",\n year = \"1998\"\n}\n\n@article{Perlmutter:1998np,\n author = \"Perlmutter, S. and others\",\n collaboration = \"Supernova Cosmology Project\",\n title = \"{Measurements of $\\Omega$ and $\\Lambda$ from 42 high redshift supernovae}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/9812133\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"LBNL-41801, LBL-41801\",\n doi = \"10.1086/307221\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J.\",\n volume = \"517\",\n pages = \"565--586\",\n year = \"1999\"\n}\n\n@article{Feldman:2012jdx,\n author = \"Feldman, G. J. and Hartnell, J. and Kobayashi, T.\",\n title = \"{Long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments}\",\n eprint = \"1210.1778\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ex\",\n doi = \"10.1155/2013/475749\",\n journal = \"Adv. High Energy Phys.\",\n volume = \"2013\",\n pages = \"475749\",\n year = \"2013\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Mohapatra:2006gs,\n author = \"Mohapatra, R. N. and Smirnov, A. Y.\",\n editor = \"Anagnostopoulos, K. and Antoniadis, I. and Fanourakis, G. and Kehagias, A. and Savoy-Navarro, A. and Wess, J. and Zoupanos, G.\",\n title = \"{Neutrino Mass and New Physics}\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/0603118\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1146/annurev.nucl.56.080805.140534\",\n journal = \"Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.\",\n volume = \"56\",\n pages = \"569--628\",\n year = \"2006\"\n}\n\n@article{Gonzalez-Garcia:2002bkq,\n author = \"Gonzalez-Garcia, M. C. and Nir, Yosef\",\n title = \"{Neutrino Masses and Mixing: Evidence and Implications}\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/0202058\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-TH-2002-021, WIS-08-02-FEB-DPP\",\n doi = \"10.1103/RevModPhys.75.345\",\n journal = \"Rev. Mod. Phys.\",\n volume = \"75\",\n pages = \"345--402\",\n year = \"2003\"\n}\n\n@article{Maltoni:2004ei,\n author = \"Maltoni, M. and Schwetz, T. and Tortola, M. A. and Valle, J. W. F.\",\n title = \"{Status of global fits to neutrino oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/0405172\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"IFIC-04-19, TUM-HEP-548-04, YITP-SB-04-29\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/122\",\n journal = \"New J. Phys.\",\n volume = \"6\",\n pages = \"122\",\n year = \"2004\"\n}\n\n@article{Mishra-Sharma:2018ykh,\n author = \"Mishra-Sharma, Siddharth and Alonso, David and Dunkley, Joanna\",\n title = \"{Neutrino masses and beyond- \\ensuremath{\\Lambda}CDM cosmology with LSST and future CMB experiments}\",\n eprint = \"1803.07561\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"PUPT 2551, PUPT-2551\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123544\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"97\",\n number = \"12\",\n pages = \"123544\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n@article{Weinberg:1988cp,\n author = \"Weinberg, Steven\",\n editor = \"Hsu, Jong-Ping and Fine, D.\",\n title = \"{The Cosmological Constant Problem}\",\n reportNumber = \"UTTG-12-88\",\n doi = \"10.1103/RevModPhys.61.1\",\n journal = \"Rev. Mod. Phys.\",\n volume = \"61\",\n pages = \"1--23\",\n year = \"1989\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Capozziello:2007ec,\n author = \"Capozziello, Salvatore and Francaviglia, Mauro\",\n title = \"{Extended Theories of Gravity and their Cosmological and Astrophysical Applications}\",\n eprint = \"0706.1146\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1007/s10714-007-0551-y\",\n journal = \"Gen. Rel. Grav.\",\n volume = \"40\",\n pages = \"357--420\",\n year = \"2008\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Capozziello:2011et,\n author = \"Capozziello, Salvatore and De Laurentis, Mariafelicia\",\n title = \"{Extended Theories of Gravity}\",\n eprint = \"1108.6266\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.physrep.2011.09.003\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rept.\",\n volume = \"509\",\n pages = \"167--321\",\n year = \"2011\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Clifton:2011jh,\n author = \"Clifton, Timothy and Ferreira, Pedro G. and Padilla, Antonio and Skordis, Constantinos\",\n title = \"{Modified Gravity and Cosmology}\",\n eprint = \"1106.2476\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.001\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rept.\",\n volume = \"513\",\n pages = \"1--189\",\n year = \"2012\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Joyce:2014kja,\n author = \"Joyce, Austin and Jain, Bhuvnesh and Khoury, Justin and Trodden, Mark\",\n title = \"{Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model}\",\n eprint = \"1407.0059\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rept.\",\n volume = \"568\",\n pages = \"1--98\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Bull:2015stt,\n author = \"Bull, Philip and others\",\n title = \"{Beyond $\\Lambda$CDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead}\",\n eprint = \"1512.05356\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.dark.2016.02.001\",\n journal = \"Phys. Dark Univ.\",\n volume = \"12\",\n pages = \"56--99\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Koyama:2015vza,\n author = \"Koyama, Kazuya\",\n title = \"{Cosmological Tests of Modified Gravity}\",\n eprint = \"1504.04623\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/0034-4885/79/4/046902\",\n journal = \"Rept. Prog. Phys.\",\n volume = \"79\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"046902\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n@article{Nicolis:2015sra,\n author = \"Nicolis, Alberto and Penco, Riccardo and Piazza, Federico and Rattazzi, Riccardo\",\n title = \"{Zoology of condensed matter: Framids, ordinary stuff, extra-ordinary stuff}\",\n eprint = \"1501.03845\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP06(2015)155\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n pages = \"155\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n\n@article{DeFelice:2010pv,\n author = \"De Felice, Antonio and Tsujikawa, Shinji\",\n title = \"{Cosmology of a covariant Galileon field}\",\n eprint = \"1007.2700\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.111301\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"105\",\n pages = \"111301\",\n year = \"2010\"\n}\n\n@article{deRham:2021fpu,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Melville, Scott and Noller, Johannes\",\n title = \"{Positivity bounds on dark energy: when matter matters}\",\n eprint = \"2103.06855\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/018\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"08\",\n pages = \"018\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Heisenberg:2019wjv,\n author = \"Heisenberg, Lavinia and Steinwachs, Christian F.\",\n title = \"{Geometrized quantum Galileons}\",\n eprint = \"1909.07111\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"FR-PHENO-2019-015\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2020/02/031\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"02\",\n pages = \"031\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Saltas:2016nkg,\n author = \"Saltas, Ippocratis D. and Vitagliano, Vincenzo\",\n title = \"{Covariantly Quantum Galileon}\",\n eprint = \"1611.07984\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.95.105002\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"95\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"105002\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n@article{Goon:2016ihr,\n author = \"Goon, Garrett and Hinterbichler, Kurt and Joyce, Austin and Trodden, Mark\",\n title = \"{Aspects of Galileon Non-Renormalization}\",\n eprint = \"1606.02295\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP11(2016)100\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"11\",\n pages = \"100\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n@article{Traykova:2021hbr,\n author = \"Traykova, Dina and Bellini, Emilio and Ferreira, Pedro G. and Garc\\'\\i{}a-Garc\\'\\i{}a, Carlos and Noller, Johannes and Zumalac\\'arregui, Miguel\",\n title = \"{Theoretical priors in scalar-tensor cosmologies: Shift-symmetric Horndeski models}\",\n eprint = \"2103.11195\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n month = \"3\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Grall:2020tqc,\n author = \"Grall, Tanguy and Melville, Scott\",\n title = \"{Inflation in motion: unitarity constraints in effective field theories with (spontaneously) broken Lorentz symmetry}\",\n eprint = \"2005.02366\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2020/09/017\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"09\",\n pages = \"017\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Grall:2021xxm,\n author = \"Grall, Tanguy and Melville, Scott\",\n title = \"{Positivity Bounds without Boosts}\",\n eprint = \"2102.05683\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n month = \"2\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{deRham:2014lqa,\n author = \"De Rham, Claudia and Keltner, Luke and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{Generalized galileon duality}\",\n eprint = \"1403.3690\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.90.024050\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"90\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"024050\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n\n@article{deRham:2013hsa,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Fasiello, Matteo and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{Galileon Duality}\",\n eprint = \"1308.2702\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.physletb.2014.03.061\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett. B\",\n volume = \"733\",\n pages = \"46--51\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n\n@article{Afkhami-Jeddi:2018own,\n author = \"Afkhami-Jeddi, Nima and Kundu, Sandipan and Tajdini,\n Amirhossein\",\n title = \"{A Conformal Collider for Holographic CFTs}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"10\",\n year = \"2018\",\n pages = \"156\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP10(2018)156\",\n eprint = \"1805.07393\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1805.07393;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Keltner:2015xda,\n author = \"Keltner, Luke and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{UV properties of Galileons: Spectral Densities}\",\n eprint = \"1502.05706\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n month = \"2\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n\n@article{Baumann:2019ghk,\n author = \"Baumann, Daniel and Green, Daniel and Hartman, Thomas\",\n title = \"{Dynamical Constraints on RG Flows and Cosmology}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"12\",\n year = \"2019\",\n pages = \"134\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP12(2019)134\",\n eprint = \"1906.10226\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1906.10226;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{deRham:2020zyh,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{Causality in curved spacetimes: The speed of light and gravity}\",\n eprint = \"2007.01847\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"Imperial/TP/2020/CdR/03\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.102.084048\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"102\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"084048\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{deRham:2019ctd,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{Speed of gravity}\",\n eprint = \"1909.00881\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"Imperial/TP/2019/CdR/04\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063518\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"101\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"063518\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Manohar:2008tc,\n author = \"Manohar, Aneesh V. and Mateu, Vicent\",\n title = \"{Dispersion Relation Bounds for pi pi Scattering}\",\n eprint = \"0801.3222\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"IFIC-08-01, FTUV-07-0121\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.77.094019\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"77\",\n pages = \"094019\",\n year = \"2008\"\n}\n\n@article{Dvali:2012zc,\n author = \"Dvali, Gia and Franca, Andre and Gomez, Cesar\",\n title = \"{Road Signs for UV-Completion}\",\n eprint = \"1204.6388\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n month = \"4\",\n year = \"2012\"\n}\n\n@article{Comellas:1995hq,\n author = \"Comellas, Jordi and Latorre, Jose Ignacio and Taron, Josep\",\n title = \"{Constraints on chiral perturbation theory parameters from QCD inequalities}\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/9507258\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"UB-ECM-PF-95-14\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0370-2693(95)01110-C\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett. B\",\n volume = \"360\",\n pages = \"109--116\",\n year = \"1995\"\n}\n\n@article{Aragone:1979hx,\n author = \"Aragone, C. and Deser, Stanley\",\n title = \"{Consistency Problems of Hypergravity}\",\n reportNumber = \"Print-79-0377 (BRANDEIS)\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0370-2693(79)90808-6\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett. B\",\n volume = \"86\",\n pages = \"161--163\",\n year = \"1979\"\n}\n\n@article{Porrati:1993in,\n author = \"Porrati, Massimo\",\n title = \"{Massive spin 5/2 fields coupled to gravity: Tree level unitarity versus the equivalence principle}\",\n eprint = \"gr-qc/9301012\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"NYU-TH-93-01-01\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0370-2693(93)91403-A\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett. B\",\n volume = \"304\",\n pages = \"77--80\",\n year = \"1993\"\n}\n\n@article{Cucchieri:1994tx,\n author = \"Cucchieri, A. and Porrati, M. and Deser, Stanley\",\n title = \"{Tree level unitarity constraints on the gravitational couplings of higher spin massive fields}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/9408073\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"IASSNS-HEP-94-63, NYU-TH-94-05-01A, CERN-TH-7388-94\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.51.4543\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"51\",\n pages = \"4543--4549\",\n year = \"1995\"\n}\n\n@article{Melville:2019wyy,\n author = \"Melville, Scott and Noller, Johannes\",\n title = \"{Positivity in the Sky: Constraining dark energy and modified gravity from the UV}\",\n eprint = \"1904.05874\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.101.021502\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"101\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"021502\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Gleyzes:2013ooa,\n author = \"Gleyzes, Jerome and Langlois, David and Piazza, Federico and Vernizzi, Filippo\",\n title = \"{Essential Building Blocks of Dark Energy}\",\n eprint = \"1304.4840\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2013/08/025\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"08\",\n pages = \"025\",\n year = \"2013\"\n}\n\n@article{Cheung:2007st,\n author = \"Cheung, Clifford and Creminelli, Paolo and Fitzpatrick, A.Liam and Kaplan, Jared and Senatore, Leonardo\",\n title = \"{The Effective Field Theory of Inflation}\",\n eprint = \"0709.0293\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IC-2007-032\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/014\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"03\",\n pages = \"014\",\n year = \"2008\"\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Singh:1974qz,\n author = \"Singh, L. P. S. and Hagen, C. R.\",\n title = \"{Lagrangian formulation for arbitrary spin. 1. The boson\n case}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D9\",\n year = \"1974\",\n pages = \"898-909\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.9.898\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = PHRVA,D9,898;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Singh:1974rc,\n author = \"Singh, L. P. S. and Hagen, C. R.\",\n title = \"{Lagrangian formulation for arbitrary spin. 2. The\n fermion case}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D9\",\n year = \"1974\",\n pages = \"910-920\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.9.910\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = PHRVA,D9,910;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Fronsdal:1978rb,\n author = \"Fronsdal, Christian\",\n title = \"{Massless Fields with Integer Spin}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D18\",\n year = \"1978\",\n pages = \"3624\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.18.3624\",\n reportNumber = \"UCLA/78/TEP/5\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = PHRVA,D18,3624;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Fang:1978wz,\n author = \"Fang, J. and Fronsdal, C.\",\n title = \"{Massless Fields with Half Integral Spin}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D18\",\n year = \"1978\",\n pages = \"3630\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.18.3630\",\n reportNumber = \"UCLA/78/TEP/14\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = PHRVA,D18,3630;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{xAct,\n author = \"Mart\\'in-Garc\\'ia, Jose M\",\n title = \"{xAct 2002-2014}\",\n journal = {http://www.xact.es/},\n}\n\n@article{xIST,\n author = \"Noller, Johannes\",\n title = \"{xIST \\& Copper 2016}\",\n journal = {https://github.com/xAct-contrib/xIST},\n}\n\n@article{Noller:2018eht,\n author = \"Noller, Johannes and Nicola, Andrina\",\n title = \"{Radiative stability and observational constraints on dark energy and modified gravity}\",\n eprint = \"1811.03082\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.102.104045\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"102\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"104045\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Noller:2018wyv,\n author = \"Noller, Johannes and Nicola, Andrina\",\n title = \"{Cosmological parameter constraints for Horndeski scalar-tensor gravity}\",\n eprint = \"1811.12928\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.99.103502\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"99\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"103502\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n@article{Baker:2017hug,\n author = \"Baker, T. and Bellini, E. and Ferreira, P. G. and Lagos,\n M. and Noller, J. and Sawicki, I.\",\n title = \"{Strong constraints on cosmological gravity from GW170817\n and GRB 170817A}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"119\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"25\",\n pages = \"251301\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.251301\",\n eprint = \"1710.06394\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1710.06394;%%\"\n}\n@article{Sakstein:2017xjx,\n author = \"Sakstein, Jeremy and Jain, Bhuvnesh\",\n title = \"{Implications of the Neutron Star Merger GW170817 for\n Cosmological Scalar-Tensor Theories}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"119\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"25\",\n pages = \"251303\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.251303\",\n eprint = \"1710.05893\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1710.05893;%%\"\n}\n@article{Ezquiaga:2017ekz,\n author = \"Ezquiaga, Jose María and Zumalac\\'arregui, Miguel\",\n title = \"{Dark Energy After GW170817: Dead Ends and the Road\n Ahead}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"119\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"25\",\n pages = \"251304\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.251304\",\n eprint = \"1710.05901\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM-CSIC-17-096, NORDITA-2017-109\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1710.05901;%%\"\n}\n@article{Creminelli:2017sry,\n author = \"Creminelli, Paolo and Vernizzi, Filippo\",\n title = \"{Dark Energy after GW170817 and GRB170817A}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"119\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"25\",\n pages = \"251302\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.251302\",\n eprint = \"1710.05877\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1710.05877;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{2041-8205-848-2-L15,\n\tauthor={V. Savchenko et. al.},\n\ttitle={INTEGRAL Detection of the First Prompt Gamma-Ray Signal Coincident with the Gravitational-wave Event GW170817},\n\tjournal={The Astrophysical Journal Letters},\n\tvolume={848},\n\tnumber={2},\n\tpages={L15},\n\turl={http://stacks.iop.org/2041-8205/848/i=2/a=L15},\n\tyear={2017},\n\tabstract={We report the INTernational Gamma-ray Astrophysics Laboratory ( INTEGRAL ) detection of the short gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A (discovered by Fermi -GBM) with a signal-to-noise ratio of 4.6, and, for the first time, its association with the gravitational waves (GWs) from binary neutron star (BNS) merging event GW170817 detected by the LIGO and Virgo observatories. The significance of association between the gamma-ray burst observed by INTEGRAL and GW170817 is 3.2σ, while the association between the Fermi -GBM and INTEGRAL detections is 4.2σ. GRB 170817A was detected by the SPI-ACS instrument about 2 s after the end of the GW event. We measure a fluence of (1.4 ± 0.4 ± 0.6) × 10 −7 erg cm −2 (75–2000 keV), where, respectively, the statistical error is given at the 1σ confidence level, and the systematic error corresponds to the uncertainty in the spectral model and instrument response. We also report on the pointed follow-up observations carried out by INTEGRAL , starting 19.5 hr after the event, and lasting for 5.4 days. We provide a stringent upper limit on any electromagnetic signal in a very broad energy range, from 3 keV to 8 MeV, constraining the soft gamma-ray afterglow flux to <7.1 × 10 −11 erg cm −2 s −1 (80–300 keV). Exploiting the unique capabilities of INTEGRAL , we constrained the gamma-ray line emission from radioactive decays that are expected to be the principal source of the energy behind a kilonova event following a BNS coalescence. Finally, we put a stringent upper limit on any delayed bursting activity, for example, from a newly formed magnetar.}\n}\n\n\n@article{2041-8205-848-2-L14,\n\tauthor={A. Goldstein et. al.},\n\ttitle={An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi -GBM Detection of GRB 170817A},\n\tjournal={The Astrophysical Journal Letters},\n\tvolume={848},\n\tnumber={2},\n\tpages={L14},\n\turl={http://stacks.iop.org/2041-8205/848/i=2/a=L14},\n\tyear={2017},\n\tabstract={On 2017 August 17 at 12:41:06 UTC the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) detected and triggered on the short gamma-ray burst (GRB) 170817A. Approximately 1.7 s prior to this GRB, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory triggered on a binary compact merger candidate associated with the GRB. This is the first unambiguous coincident observation of gravitational waves and electromagnetic radiation from a single astrophysical source and marks the start of gravitational-wave multi-messenger astronomy. We report the GBM observations and analysis of this ordinary short GRB, which extraordinarily confirms that at least some short GRBs are produced by binary compact mergers.}\n}\n\n@article{2041-8205-848-2-L12,\n\tauthor={B. P. Abbott et. al.},\n\ttitle={Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger},\n\tjournal={The Astrophysical Journal Letters},\n\tvolume={848},\n\tnumber={2},\n\tpages={L12},\n\turl={http://stacks.iop.org/2041-8205/848/i=2/a=L12},\n\tyear={2017},\n\tabstract={On 2017 August 17 a binary neutron star coalescence candidate (later designated GW170817) with merger time 12:41:04 UTC was observed through gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors. The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor independently detected a gamma-ray burst (GRB 170817A) with a time delay of ##IMG## [http://ej.iop.org/images/2041-8205/848/2/L12/apjlaa91c9ieqn1.gif] {$\\sim 1.7\\,{\\rm{s}}$} with respect to the merger time. From the gravitational-wave signal, the source was initially localized to a sky region of 31 deg 2 at a luminosity distance of ##IMG## [http://ej.iop.org/images/2041-8205/848/2/L12/apjlaa91c9ieqn2.gif] {${40}_{-8}^{+8}$} Mpc and with component masses consistent with neutron stars. The component masses were later measured to be in the range 0.86 to 2.26 ##IMG## [http://ej.iop.org/images/2041-8205/848/2/L12/apjlaa91c9ieqn3.gif] {$\\,{M}_{\\odot }$} . An extensive observing campaign was launched across the electromagnetic spectrum leading to the discovery of a bright optical transient (SSS17a, now with the IAU identification of AT 2017gfo) in NGC 4993 (at ##IMG## [http://ej.iop.org/images/2041-8205/848/2/L12/apjlaa91c9ieqn4.gif] {$\\sim 40\\,{\\rm{Mpc}}$} ) less than 11 hours after the merger by the One-Meter, Two Hemisphere (1M2H) team using the 1 m Swope Telescope. The optical transient was independently detected by multiple teams within an hour. Subsequent observations targeted the object and its environment. Early ultraviolet observations revealed a blue transient that faded within 48 hours. Optical and infrared observations showed a redward evolution over ∼10 days. Following early non-detections, X-ray and radio emission were discovered at the transient’s position ##IMG## [http://ej.iop.org/images/2041-8205/848/2/L12/apjlaa91c9ieqn5.gif] {$\\sim 9$} and ##IMG## [http://ej.iop.org/images/2041-8205/848/2/L12/apjlaa91c9ieqn6.gif] {$\\sim 16$} days, respectively, after the merger. Both the X-ray and radio emission likely arise from a physical process that is distinct from the one that generates the UV/optical/near-infrared emission. No ultra-high-energy gamma-rays and no neutrino candidates consistent with the source were found in follow-up searches. These observations support the hypothesis that GW170817 was produced by the merger of two neutron stars in NGC 4993 followed by a short gamma-ray burst (GRB 170817A) and a kilonova/macronova powered by the radioactive decay of r -process nuclei synthesized in the ejecta.}\n}\n\n\n@article{2041-8205-848-2-L13,\n\tauthor={B. P. Abbott et. al.},\n\ttitle={Gravitational Waves and Gamma-Rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A},\n\tjournal={The Astrophysical Journal Letters},\n\tvolume={848},\n\tnumber={2},\n\tpages={L13},\n\turl={http://stacks.iop.org/2041-8205/848/i=2/a=L13},\n\tyear={2017},\n\tabstract={On 2017 August 17, the gravitational-wave event GW170817 was observed by the Advanced LIGO and Virgo detectors, and the gamma-ray burst (GRB) GRB 170817A was observed independently by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor, and the Anti-Coincidence Shield for the Spectrometer for the International Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory . The probability of the near-simultaneous temporal and spatial observation of GRB 170817A and GW170817 occurring by chance is ##IMG## [http://ej.iop.org/images/2041-8205/848/2/L13/apjlaa920cieqn1.gif] {$5.0\\times {10}^{-8}$} . We therefore confirm binary neutron star mergers as a progenitor of short GRBs. The association of GW170817 and GRB 170817A provides new insight into fundamental physics and the origin of short GRBs. We use the observed time delay of ##IMG## [http://ej.iop.org/images/2041-8205/848/2/L13/apjlaa920cieqn2.gif] {$(+1.74\\pm 0.05)\\,{\\rm{s}}$} between GRB 170817A and GW170817 to: (i) constrain the difference between the speed of gravity and the speed of light to be between ##IMG## [http://ej.iop.org/images/2041-8205/848/2/L13/apjlaa920cieqn3.gif] {$-3\\times {10}^{-15}$} and ##IMG## [http://ej.iop.org/images/2041-8205/848/2/L13/apjlaa920cieqn4.gif] {$+7\\times {10}^{-16}$} times the speed of light, (ii) place new bounds on the violation of Lorentz invariance, (iii) present a new test of the equivalence principle by constraining the Shapiro delay between gravitational and electromagnetic radiation. We also use the time delay to constrain the size and bulk Lorentz factor of the region emitting the gamma-rays. GRB 170817A is the closest short GRB with a known distance, but is between 2 and 6 orders of magnitude less energetic than other bursts with measured redshift. A new generation of gamma-ray detectors, and subthreshold searches in existing detectors, will be essential to detect similar short bursts at greater distances. Finally, we predict a joint detection rate for the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor and the Advanced LIGO and Virgo detectors of 0.1–1.4 per year during the 2018–2019 observing run and 0.3–1.7 per year at design sensitivity.}\n}\n\n@article{Max:2017flc,\n\tauthor = \"Max, Kevin and Platscher, Moritz and Smirnov, Juri\",\n\ttitle = \"{Gravitational Wave Oscillations in Bigravity}\",\n\tjournal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n\tvolume = \"119\",\n\tyear = \"2017\",\n\tnumber = \"11\",\n\tpages = \"111101\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.111101\",\n\teprint = \"1703.07785\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1703.07785;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Raveri:2014eea,\n author = \"Raveri, Marco and Baccigalupi, Carlo and Silvestri,\n Alessandra and Zhou, Shuang-Yong\",\n title = \"{Measuring the speed of cosmological gravitational\n waves}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D91\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"061501\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.91.061501\",\n eprint = \"1405.7974\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1405.7974;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Randall:1999ee,\n author = \"Randall, Lisa and Sundrum, Raman\",\n title = \"{A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"83\",\n year = \"1999\",\n pages = \"3370-3373\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3370\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/9905221\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"MIT-CTP-2860, PUPT-1860, BUHEP-99-9\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = HEP-PH/9905221;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Amendola:2014wma,\n author = \"Amendola, Luca and Ballesteros, Guillermo and Pettorino,\n Valeria\",\n title = \"{Effects of modified gravity on B-mode polarization}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D90\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"043009\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.90.043009\",\n eprint = \"1405.7004\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1405.7004;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Reischke:2018ooh,\n author = \"Reischke, Robert and Mancini, Alessio Spurio and\n Schafer, Bjorn Malte and Merkel, Philipp M.\",\n title = \"{Investigating scalar-tensor-gravity with statistics of\n the cosmic large-scale structure}\",\n year = \"2018\",\n eprint = \"1804.02441\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1804.02441;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Barreira:2014jha,\n author = \"Barreira, Alexandre and Li, Baojiu and Baugh, Carlton and\n Pascoli, Silvia\",\n title = \"{The observational status of Galileon gravity after\n Planck}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1408\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"059\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2014/08/059\",\n eprint = \"1406.0485\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1406.0485;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Lombriser:2015sxa,\n author = \"Lombriser, Lucas and Taylor, Andy\",\n title = \"{Breaking a Dark Degeneracy with Gravitational Waves}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1603\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"03\",\n pages = \"031\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2016/03/031\",\n eprint = \"1509.08458\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1509.08458;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Linder:2016wqw,\n author = \"Linder, Eric V.\",\n title = \"{Challenges in connecting modified gravity theory and\n observations}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D95\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"023518\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.95.023518\",\n eprint = \"1607.03113\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1607.03113;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Linder:2014fna,\n author = \"Linder, Eric V.\",\n title = \"{Are Scalar and Tensor Deviations Related in Modified\n Gravity?}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D90\",\n year = \"2014\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"083536\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.90.083536\",\n eprint = \"1407.8184\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1407.8184;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Jimenez:2015bwa,\n author = \"Beltran Jimenez, Jose and Piazza, Federico and Velten,\n Hermano\",\n title = \"{Evading the Vainshtein Mechanism with Anomalous\n Gravitational Wave Speed: Constraints on Modified Gravity\n from Binary Pulsars}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"116\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"061101\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061101\",\n eprint = \"1507.05047\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1507.05047;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Sawicki:2016klv,\n author = \"Sawicki, Ignacy and Saltas, Ippocratis D. and Motta,\n Mariele and Amendola, Luca and Kunz, Martin\",\n title = \"{Nonstandard gravitational waves imply gravitational\n slip: On the difficulty of partially hiding new\n gravitational degrees of freedom}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D95\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"083520\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.95.083520\",\n eprint = \"1612.02002\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1612.02002;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Saltas:2014dha,\n author = \"Saltas, Ippocratis D. and Sawicki, Ignacy and Amendola,\n Luca and Kunz, Martin\",\n title = \"{Anisotropic Stress as a Signature of Nonstandard\n Propagation of Gravitational Waves}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"113\",\n year = \"2014\",\n number = \"19\",\n pages = \"191101\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.191101\",\n eprint = \"1406.7139\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1406.7139;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Bettoni:2016mij,\n author = \"Bettoni, Dario and Ezquiaga, Jose Mar�a and\n Hinterbichler, Kurt and Zumalac\\'arregui, Miguel\",\n title = \"{Speed of Gravitational Waves and the Fate of\n Scalar-Tensor Gravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D95\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"084029\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.95.084029\",\n eprint = \"1608.01982\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n reportNumber = \"NORDITA-2016-86, IFT-UAM-CSIC-16-074\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1608.01982;%%\"\n}\n\n\n\n\n@article{deRham:2016nuf,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Deskins, J. Tate and Tolley, Andrew\n J. and Zhou, Shuang-Yong\",\n title = \"{Graviton Mass Bounds}\",\n journal = \"Rev. Mod. Phys.\",\n volume = \"89\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"025004\",\n doi = \"10.1103/RevModPhys.89.025004\",\n eprint = \"1606.08462\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1606.08462;%%\"\n}\n@article{Cusin:2014psa,\n author = \"Cusin, Giulia and Durrer, Ruth and Guarato, Pietro and\n Motta, Mariele\",\n title = \"{Gravitational waves in bigravity cosmology}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1505\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"05\",\n pages = \"030\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2015/05/030\",\n eprint = \"1412.5979\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1412.5979;%%\"\n}\n@article{Santoni:2018rrx,\n author = \"Santoni, Luca and Trincherini, Enrico and Trombetta,\n Leonardo G.\",\n title = \"{Behind Horndeski: Structurally Robust Higher Derivative\n EFTs}\",\n year = \"2018\",\n eprint = \"1806.10073\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1806.10073;%%\"\n}\n@article{Lombriser:2016yzn,\n author = \"Lombriser, Lucas and Lima, Nelson A.\",\n title = \"{Challenges to Self-Acceleration in Modified Gravity from\n Gravitational Waves and Large-Scale Structure}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett.\",\n volume = \"B765\",\n year = \"2017\",\n pages = \"382-385\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.physletb.2016.12.048\",\n eprint = \"1602.07670\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1602.07670;%%\"\n}\n@article{Lagos:2014lca,\n author = \"Lagos, Macarena and Ferreira, Pedro G.\",\n title = \"{Cosmological perturbations in massive bigravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1412\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"026\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2014/12/026\",\n eprint = \"1410.0207\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1410.0207;%%\"\n}\n@article{Deffayet:2015qwa,\n author = \"Deffayet, Cedric and Esposito-Farese, Gilles and Steer,\n Daniele A.\",\n title = \"{Counting the degrees of freedom of generalized\n Galileons}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D92\",\n year = \"2015\",\n pages = \"084013\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.92.084013\",\n eprint = \"1506.01974\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1506.01974;%%\"\n}\n@article{ArmendarizPicon:2009ai,\n author = \"Armendariz-Picon, Cristian and Diez-Tejedor, Alberto\",\n title = \"{Aether Unleashed}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"0912\",\n year = \"2009\",\n pages = \"018\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2009/12/018\",\n eprint = \"0904.0809\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0904.0809;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Lagos:2017hdr,\n author = \"Lagos, Macarena and Bellini, Emilio and Noller, Johannes\n and Ferreira, Pedro G. and Baker, Tessa\",\n title = \"{A general theory of linear cosmological perturbations:\n stability conditions, the quasistatic limit and dynamics}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1803\",\n year = \"2018\",\n number = \"03\",\n pages = \"021\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/021\",\n eprint = \"1711.09893\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1711.09893;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Zlosnik:2007bu,\n author = \"Zlosnik, T. G and Ferreira, P. G. and Starkman, G. D.\",\n title = \"{Growth of structure in theories with a dynamical\n preferred frame}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D77\",\n year = \"2008\",\n pages = \"084010\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.77.084010\",\n eprint = \"0711.0520\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0711.0520;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Tasinato:2014eka,\n author = \"Tasinato, Gianmassimo\",\n title = \"{Cosmic Acceleration from Abelian Symmetry Breaking}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"04\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"067\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP04(2014)067\",\n eprint = \"1402.6450\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1402.6450;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{DeFelice:2013nba,\n\tauthor = \"De Felice, Antonio and Nakamura, Takashi and Tanaka,\n\tTakahiro\",\n\ttitle = \"{Possible existence of viable models of bi-gravity with\n\tdetectable graviton oscillations by gravitational wave\n\tdetectors}\",\n\tjournal = \"PTEP\",\n\tvolume = \"2014\",\n\tyear = \"2014\",\n\tpages = \"043E01\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1093/ptep/ptu024\",\n\teprint = \"1304.3920\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1304.3920;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{TheLIGOScientific:2016src,\n\tauthor = \"Abbott, B. P. and others\",\n\ttitle = \"{Tests of general relativity with GW150914}\",\n\tcollaboration = \"Virgo, LIGO Scientific\",\n\tjournal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n\tvolume = \"116\",\n\tyear = \"2016\",\n\tnumber = \"22\",\n\tpages = \"221101\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.221101\",\n\teprint = \"1602.03841\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n\treportNumber = \"LIGO-P1500213\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1602.03841;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Brax:2017hxh,\n\tauthor = \"Brax, Philippe and Davis, Anne-Christine and Noller,\n\tJohannes\",\n\ttitle = \"{Gravitational Waves in Doubly Coupled Bigravity}\",\n\tjournal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n\tvolume = \"D96\",\n\tyear = \"2017\",\n\tnumber = \"2\",\n\tpages = \"023518\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.96.023518\",\n\teprint = \"1703.08016\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1703.08016;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Pogosian:2016ji,\n author = \"Pogosian, L. and Silvestri, A.\",\n title = \"{What can cosmology tell us about gravity? Constraining Horndeski gravity with $\\Sigma$ and $\\mu$}\",\n journal = \"Physical Review D\",\narchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n eprint = \"1606.05339\",\n year = \"2016\",\n volume = \"94\",\n number = \"10\",\n eid = \"104014\",\n pages = \"104014\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.94.104014\",\n adsurl = \"http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PhRvD..94j4014P\",\n adsnote = \"Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Jimenez:2009ai,\n author = \"Beltran Jimenez, Jose and Maroto, Antonio L.\",\n title = \"{Cosmological evolution in vector-tensor theories of\n gravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D80\",\n year = \"2009\",\n pages = \"063512\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.80.063512\",\n eprint = \"0905.1245\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0905.1245;%%\"\n}\n@article{Li:2007vz,\n author = \"Li, Baojiu and Fonseca Mota, David and Barrow, John D.\",\n title = \"{Detecting a Lorentz-Violating Field in Cosmology}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D77\",\n year = \"2008\",\n pages = \"024032\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.77.024032\",\n eprint = \"0709.4581\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0709.4581;%%\"\n}\n@article{Linder:2015rcz,\n author = \"Linder, Eric V. and Sengör, Gizem and Watson, Scott\",\n title = \"{Is the Effective Field Theory of Dark Energy\n Effective?}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1605\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"05\",\n pages = \"053\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/053\",\n eprint = \"1512.06180\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.06180;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Heisenberg:2016eld,\n author = \"Heisenberg, Lavinia and Kase, Ryotaro and Tsujikawa,\n Shinji\",\n title = \"{Beyond generalized Proca theories}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett.\",\n volume = \"B760\",\n year = \"2016\",\n pages = \"617-626\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.physletb.2016.07.052\",\n eprint = \"1605.05565\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1605.05565;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Jacobson:2000xp,\n author = \"Jacobson, Ted and Mattingly, David\",\n title = \"{Gravity with a dynamical preferred frame}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D64\",\n year = \"2001\",\n pages = \"024028\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.64.024028\",\n eprint = \"gr-qc/0007031\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = GR-QC/0007031;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Zlosnik:2006sb,\n author = \"Zlosnik, T. G. and Ferreira, P. G. and Starkman, Glenn\n D.\",\n title = \"{The Vector-tensor nature of Bekenstein's relativistic\n theory of modified gravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D74\",\n year = \"2006\",\n pages = \"044037\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.74.044037\",\n eprint = \"gr-qc/0606039\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = GR-QC/0606039;%%\"\n}\n@article{Deffayet:2013tca,\n author = \"Deffayet, Cedric and Gumrukcuoglu, A. Emir and\n Mukohyama, Shinji and Wang, Yi\",\n title = \"{A no-go theorem for generalized vector Galileons on flat\n spacetime}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"04\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"082\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP04(2014)082\",\n eprint = \"1312.6690\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1312.6690;%%\"\n}\n@article{Tasinato:2014mia,\n author = \"Tasinato, Gianmassimo\",\n title = \"{A small cosmological constant from Abelian symmetry\n breaking}\",\n journal = \"Class. Quant. Grav.\",\n volume = \"31\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"225004\",\n doi = \"10.1088/0264-9381/31/22/225004\",\n eprint = \"1404.4883\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1404.4883;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Alonso:2016suf,\n author = \"Alonso, David and Bellini, Emilio and Ferreira, Pedro G.\n and Zumalac\\'arregui, Miguel\",\n title = \"{Observational future of cosmological scalar-tensor\n theories}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D95\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"063502\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.95.063502\",\n eprint = \"1610.09290\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"NORDITA-2016-114\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1610.09290;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Sawicki:2015zya,\n author = \"Sawicki, Ignacy and Bellini, Emilio\",\n title = \"{Limits of quasistatic approximation in modified-gravity\n cosmologies}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D92\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"084061\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.92.084061\",\n eprint = \"1503.06831\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1503.06831;%%\"\n}\n@article{Ade:2015xua,\n author = \"Planck Collaboration and others\",\n title = \"{Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters}\",\n collaboration = \"Planck\",\n year = \"2015\",\n eprint = \"1502.01589\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1502.01589;%%\"\n}\n@article{Lagos:2016gep,\n author = \"Lagos, Macarena and Ferreira, Pedro G.\",\n title = \"{A general theory of linear cosmological perturbations:\n bimetric theories}\",\n year = \"2016\",\n eprint = \"1610.00553\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1610.00553;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Heisenberg:2014rta,\n author = \"Heisenberg, Lavinia\",\n title = \"{Generalization of the Proca Action}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1405\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"015\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2014/05/015\",\n eprint = \"1402.7026\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1402.7026;%%\"\n}\n@article{Crisostomi:2016czh,\n author = \"Crisostomi, Marco and Koyama, Kazuya and Tasinato,\n Gianmassimo\",\n title = \"{Extended Scalar-Tensor Theories of Gravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1604\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"04\",\n pages = \"044\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/044\",\n eprint = \"1602.03119\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1602.03119;%%\"\n}\n@article{BenAchour:2016fzp,\n OPTauthor = \"Ben Achour, Jibril and Crisostomi, Marco and Koyama,\n Kazuya and Langlois, David and Noui, Karim and Tasinato,\n Gianmassimo\",\n author = \"Ben Achour, Jibril and others\",\n title = \"{Degenerate higher order scalar-tensor theories beyond\n Horndeski up to cubic order}\",\n year = \"2016\",\n eprint = \"1608.08135\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1608.08135;%%\"\n}\n@article{Vakili:2012tm,\n author = \"Vakili, Babak and Khosravi, Nima\",\n title = \"{Classical and quantum massive cosmology for the open FRW\n universe}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D85\",\n year = \"2012\",\n pages = \"083529\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.85.083529\",\n eprint = \"1204.1456\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1204.1456;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{deRham:2018red,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Melville, Scott\",\n title = \"{Gravitational Rainbows: LIGO and Dark Energy at its\n Cutoff}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"121\",\n year = \"2018\",\n number = \"22\",\n pages = \"221101\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.221101\",\n eprint = \"1806.09417\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"Imperial/TP/2018/CdR/02\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1806.09417;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Gumrukcuoglu:2011zh,\n author = \"Gumrukcuoglu, A. Emir and Lin, Chunshan and Mukohyama,\n Shinji\",\n title = \"{Cosmological perturbations of self-accelerating universe\n in nonlinear massive gravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1203\",\n year = \"2012\",\n pages = \"006\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2012/03/006\",\n eprint = \"1111.4107\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IPMU11-0189\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1111.4107;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Gumrukcuoglu:2011ew,\n author = \"Gumrukcuoglu, A. Emir and Lin, Chunshan and Mukohyama,\n Shinji\",\n title = \"{Open FRW universes and self-acceleration from nonlinear\n massive gravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1111\",\n year = \"2011\",\n pages = \"030\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2011/11/030\",\n eprint = \"1109.3845\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IPMU11-0154\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1109.3845;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Gumrukcuoglu:2016jbh,\n author = \"Gümrükçüoğlu, A. Emir and Mukohyama, Shinji and\n Sotiriou, Thomas P.\",\n title = \"{Low energy ghosts and the Jeans’ instability}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D94\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"064001\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.94.064001\",\n eprint = \"1606.00618\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IMPERIAL-TP-2016-AEG-3, YITP-16-66, IPMU16-0079\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1606.00618;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{DeFelice:2016ucp,\n author = \"De Felice, Antonio and Frusciante, Noemi and\n Papadomanolakis, Georgios\",\n title = \"{On the stability conditions for theories of modified\n gravity in the presence of matter fields}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1703\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"03\",\n pages = \"027\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2017/03/027\",\n eprint = \"1609.03599\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n reportNumber = \"YITP-16-102\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1609.03599;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{DeFelice:2012mx,\n author = \"De Felice, Antonio and Gumrukcuoglu, A. Emir and\n Mukohyama, Shinji\",\n title = \"{Massive gravity: nonlinear instability of the\n homogeneous and isotropic universe}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"109\",\n year = \"2012\",\n pages = \"171101\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.171101\",\n eprint = \"1206.2080\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IPMU12-0118\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1206.2080;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{ArkaniHamed:2003uz,\n author = \"Arkani-Hamed, Nima and Creminelli, Paolo and Mukohyama,\n Shinji and Zaldarriaga, Matias\",\n title = \"{Ghost inflation}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"0404\",\n year = \"2004\",\n pages = \"001\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2004/04/001\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0312100\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"HUTP-03-A079\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = HEP-TH/0312100;%%\"\n}\n@article{Adams:2006sv,\n author = \"Adams, Allan and Arkani-Hamed, Nima and Dubovsky, Sergei\n and Nicolis, Alberto and Rattazzi, Riccardo\",\n title = \"{Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV\n completion}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"10\",\n year = \"2006\",\n pages = \"014\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2006/10/014\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0602178\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-PH-TH-2006-033, HUTP-06-A0005\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = HEP-TH/0602178;%%\"\n}\n@article{Burgess:1992gx,\n author = \"Burgess, C. P. and London, David\",\n title = \"{Uses and abuses of effective Lagrangians}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D48\",\n year = \"1993\",\n pages = \"4337-4351\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.48.4337\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/9203216\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"MCGILL-92-05, UDEM-LPN-TH-84\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = HEP-PH/9203216;%%\"\n}\n@article{Giudice:2007fh,\n author = \"Giudice, G. F. and Grojean, C. and Pomarol, A. and\n Rattazzi, R.\",\n title = \"{The Strongly-Interacting Light Higgs}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n year = \"2007\",\n pages = \"045\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2007/06/045\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/0703164\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-PH-TH-2007-47\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = HEP-PH/0703164;%%\"\n}\n@article{deRham:2010tw,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Gabadadze, Gregory and Heisenberg,\n Lavinia and Pirtskhalava, David\",\n title = \"{Cosmic Acceleration and the Helicity-0 Graviton}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D83\",\n year = \"2011\",\n pages = \"103516\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.83.103516\",\n eprint = \"1010.1780\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"NYU-TH-09-18-10\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1010.1780;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Pereira:2015jua,\n author = \"Pereira, S. H. and Mendonça, E. L. and S., A. Pinho S.\n and Jesus, J. F.\",\n title = \"{Cosmological bounds on open FLRW solutions of massive\n gravity}\",\n journal = \"Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofis.\",\n volume = \"52\",\n year = \"2016\",\n pages = \"125-131\",\n eprint = \"1504.02295\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1504.02295;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{deRham:2014gla,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Fasiello, Matteo and Tolley, Andrew\n J.\",\n title = \"{Stable FLRW solutions in Generalized Massive Gravity}\",\n journal = \"Int. J. Mod. Phys.\",\n volume = \"D23\",\n year = \"2014\",\n number = \"13\",\n pages = \"1443006\",\n doi = \"10.1142/S0218271814430068\",\n eprint = \"1410.0960\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1410.0960;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{D'Amico:2011jj,\n author = \"D'Amico, G. and de Rham, C. and Dubovsky, S. and\n Gabadadze, G. and Pirtskhalava, D. and Tolley, A. J.\",\n title = \"{Massive Cosmologies}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D84\",\n year = \"2011\",\n pages = \"124046\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.84.124046\",\n eprint = \"1108.5231\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"NYU-TH-08-28-11\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1108.5231;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Higuchi:1986py,\n author = \"Higuchi, Atsushi\",\n title = \"{Forbidden Mass Range for Spin-2 Field Theory in De\n Sitter Space-time}\",\n journal = \"Nucl. Phys.\",\n volume = \"B282\",\n year = \"1987\",\n pages = \"397-436\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0550-3213(87)90691-2\",\n reportNumber = \"YTP-86-06\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = NUPHA,B282,397;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Fasiello:2012rw,\n author = \"Fasiello, Matteo and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{Cosmological perturbations in Massive Gravity and the\n Higuchi bound}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1211\",\n year = \"2012\",\n pages = \"035\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2012/11/035\",\n eprint = \"1206.3852\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1206.3852;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Heisenberg:2016spl,\n author = \"Heisenberg, Lavinia and Refregier, Alexandre\",\n title = \"{Cosmology in massive gravity with effective composite\n metric}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1609\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"09\",\n pages = \"020\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2016/09/020\",\n eprint = \"1604.07306\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1604.07306;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Jimenez:2015jqa,\n author = \"Beltran Jimenez, Jose and Heisenberg, Lavinia and Olmo,\n Gonzalo J. and Ringeval, Christophe\",\n title = \"{Cascading dust inflation in Born-Infeld gravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1511\",\n year = \"2015\",\n pages = \"046\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2015/11/046\",\n eprint = \"1509.01188\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1509.01188;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Cho:2014xaa,\n author = \"Cho, Inyong and Singh, Naveen K.\",\n title = \"{Scalar perturbation produced at the pre-inflationary\n stage in Eddington-inspired Born–Infeld gravity}\",\n journal = \"Eur. Phys. J.\",\n volume = \"C75\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"240\",\n doi = \"10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3458-x\",\n eprint = \"1412.6344\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1412.6344;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Cho:2014jta,\n author = \"Cho, Inyong and Singh, Naveen K.\",\n title = \"{Tensor-to-scalar ratio in Eddington-inspired\n Born–Infeld inflation}\",\n journal = \"Eur. Phys. J.\",\n volume = \"C74\",\n year = \"2014\",\n number = \"11\",\n pages = \"3155\",\n doi = \"10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3155-1\",\n eprint = \"1408.2652\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1408.2652;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Cho:2014ija,\n author = \"Cho, Inyong and Kim, Hyeong-Chan\",\n title = \"{Inflationary tensor perturbation in Eddington-inspired\n born-infeld gravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D90\",\n year = \"2014\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"024063\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.90.024063\",\n eprint = \"1404.6081\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1404.6081;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Bouhmadi-Lopez:2013lha,\n author = \"Bouhmadi-Lopez, Mariam and Chen, Che-Yu and Chen, Pisin\",\n title = \"{Is Eddington-Born-Infeld theory really free of\n cosmological singularities?}\",\n journal = \"Eur. Phys. J.\",\n volume = \"C74\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"2802\",\n doi = \"10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2802-x\",\n eprint = \"1302.5013\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1302.5013;%%\"\n}\n\n@inproceedings{EscamillaRivera:2013hv,\n author = \"Escamilla-Rivera, Celia and Banados, Maximo and Ferreira,\n Pedro G.\",\n title = \"{The rise of a tensor instability in Eddington-inspired\n gravity}\",\n booktitle = \"{Proceedings, 13th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent\n Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General\n Relativity, Astrophysics, and Relativistic Field Theories\n (MG13): Stockholm, Sweden, July 1-7, 2012}\",\n year = \"2015\",\n url = \"https://inspirehep.net/record/1215597/files/arXiv:1301.5264.pdf\",\n pages = \"1310-1312\",\n doi = \"10.1142/9789814623995_0157\",\n eprint = \"1301.5264\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1301.5264;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Scargill:2012kg,\n author = \"Scargill, James H. C. and Banados, Maximo and Ferreira,\n Pedro G.\",\n title = \"{Cosmology with Eddington-inspired Gravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D86\",\n year = \"2012\",\n pages = \"103533\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.86.103533\",\n eprint = \"1210.1521\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1210.1521;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Comelli:2015pua,\n author = \"Comelli, Denis and Crisostomi, Marco and Koyama, Kazuya\n and Pilo, Luigi and Tasinato, Gianmassimo\",\n title = \"{Cosmology of bigravity with doubly coupled matter}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1504\",\n year = \"2015\",\n pages = \"026\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2015/04/026\",\n eprint = \"1501.00864\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1501.00864;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Lagos:2015sya,\n author = \"Lagos, Macarena and Noller, Johannes\",\n title = \"{New massive bigravity cosmologies with double matter\n coupling}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1601\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"01\",\n pages = \"023\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2016/01/023\",\n eprint = \"1508.05864\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1508.05864;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Aoki:2015xqa,\n author = \"Aoki, Katsuki and Maeda, Kei-ichi and Namba, Ryo\",\n title = \"{Stability of the Early Universe in Bigravity Theory}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D92\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"044054\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.92.044054\",\n eprint = \"1506.04543\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IPMU-15-0082\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1506.04543;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Aoki:2014cla,\n author = \"Aoki, Katsuki and Maeda, Kei-ichi\",\n title = \"{Dark matter in ghost-free bigravity theory: From a\n galaxy scale to the universe}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D90\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"124089\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.90.124089\",\n eprint = \"1409.0202\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1409.0202;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Gumrukcuoglu:2014xba,\n author = \"Emir Gumrukcuoglu, A. and Heisenberg, Lavinia and\n Mukohyama, Shinji\",\n title = \"{Cosmological perturbations in massive gravity with\n doubly coupled matter}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1502\",\n year = \"2015\",\n pages = \"022\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2015/02/022\",\n eprint = \"1409.7260\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IPMU14-0306\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1409.7260;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Enander:2014xga,\n author = \"Enander, Jonas and Solomon, Adam R. and Akrami, Yashar\n and Mortsell, Edvard\",\n title = \"{Cosmic expansion histories in massive bigravity with\n symmetric matter coupling}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1501\",\n year = \"2015\",\n pages = \"006\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2015/01/006\",\n eprint = \"1409.2860\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1409.2860;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{DeFelice:2014nja,\n author = \"De Felice, Antonio and Gumrukcuoglu, A. Emir and\n Mukohyama, Shinji and Tanahashi, Norihiro and Tanaka,\n Takahiro\",\n title = \"{Viable cosmology in bimetric theory}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1406\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"037\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2014/06/037\",\n eprint = \"1404.0008\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IPMU14-0084, YITP-14-23, KUNS-2491\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1404.0008;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Renk:2017rzu,\n author = \"Renk, Janina and Zumalac\\'arregui, Miguel and Montanari,\n Francesco and Barreira, Alexandre\",\n title = \"{Galileon gravity in light of ISW, CMB, BAO and H$_0$\n data}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1710\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"020\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2017/10/020\",\n eprint = \"1707.02263\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"NORDITA-2017-068, HIP-2017-17-TH\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1707.02263;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Aoki:2013joa,\n author = \"Aoki, Katsuki and Maeda, Kei-ichi\",\n title = \"{Cosmology in ghost-free bigravity theory with twin\n matter fluids: The origin of \"dark matter\"}\",\n journal = \"Phys.Rev.\",\n volume = \"D89\",\n pages = \"064051\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.89.064051\",\n year = \"2014\",\n eprint = \"1312.7040\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1312.7040;%%\",\n}\n\n\n@article{Tamanini:2013xia,\n author = \"Tamanini, Nicola and Saridakis, Emmanuel N. and Koivisto,\n Tomi S.\",\n title = \"{The Cosmology of Interacting Spin-2 Fields}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1402\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"015\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2014/02/015\",\n eprint = \"1307.5984\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1307.5984;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Akrami:2013ffa,\n author = \"Akrami, Yashar and Koivisto, Tomi S. and Mota, David F.\n and Sandstad, Marit\",\n title = \"{Bimetric gravity doubly coupled to matter: theory and\n cosmological implications}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1310\",\n pages = \"046\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2013/10/046\",\n year = \"2013\",\n eprint = \"1306.0004\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1306.0004;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{Capozziello:2012re,\n author = \"Capozziello, Salvatore and Martin-Moruno, Prado\",\n title = \"{Bounces, turnarounds and singularities in bimetric\n gravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett.\",\n volume = \"B719\",\n year = \"2013\",\n pages = \"14-17\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.physletb.2013.01.025\",\n eprint = \"1211.0214\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1211.0214;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Akrami:2015qga,\n author = \"Akrami, Yashar and Hassan, S. F. and Koennig, Frank and\n Schmidt-May, Angnis and Solomon, Adam R.\",\n title = \"{Bimetric gravity is cosmologically viable}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett.\",\n volume = \"B748\",\n year = \"2015\",\n pages = \"37-44\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.physletb.2015.06.062\",\n eprint = \"1503.07521\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n reportNumber = \"NORDITA-2015-31\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1503.07521;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Fasiello:2015csa,\n author = \"Fasiello, Matteo and Ribeiro, Raquel H.\",\n title = \"{Mild bounds on bigravity from primordial gravitational\n waves}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1507\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"07\",\n pages = \"027\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2015/07/027\",\n eprint = \"1505.00404\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1505.00404;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{deRham:2014wfa,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Ribeiro, Raquel H.\",\n title = \"{Riding on irrelevant operators}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1411\",\n year = \"2014\",\n number = \"11\",\n pages = \"016\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2014/11/016\",\n eprint = \"1405.5213\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1405.5213;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Cusin:2015pya,\n author = \"Cusin, Giulia and Durrer, Ruth and Guarato, Pietro and\n Motta, Mariele\",\n title = \"{Inflationary perturbations in bimetric gravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1509\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"09\",\n pages = \"043\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2015/09/043,\n 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/9/043\",\n eprint = \"1505.01091\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1505.01091;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Konnig:2015lfa,\n author = \"Koennig, Frank\",\n title = \"{Higuchi Ghosts and Gradient Instabilities in Bimetric\n Gravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D91\",\n year = \"2015\",\n pages = \"104019\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.91.104019\",\n eprint = \"1503.07436\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"NORDITA-2015-44\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1503.07436;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Johnson:2015tfa,\n author = \"Johnson, Matthew and Terrana, Alexandra\",\n title = \"{Tensor Modes in Bigravity: Primordial to Present}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D92\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"044001\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.92.044001\",\n eprint = \"1503.05560\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1503.05560;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Amendola:2015tua,\n author = \"Amendola, Luca and Koennig, Frank and Martinelli, Matteo\n and Pettorino, Valeria and Zumalac\\'arregui, Miguel\",\n title = \"{Surfing gravitational waves: can bigravity survive\n growing tensor modes?}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1505\",\n year = \"2015\",\n pages = \"052\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2015/05/052\",\n eprint = \"1503.02490\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1503.02490;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Soloviev:2015wya,\n author = \"Soloviev, Vladimir O.\",\n title = \"{Hamiltonian cosmology in bigravity and massive gravity}\",\n year = \"2015\",\n eprint = \"1505.00840\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1505.00840;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Nersisyan:2015oha,\n author = \"Nersisyan, Henrik and Akrami, Yashar and Amendola, Luca\",\n title = \"{Consistent metric combinations in cosmology of massive\n bigravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D92\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"104034\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.92.104034\",\n eprint = \"1502.03988\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1502.03988;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Enander:2015vja,\n author = \"Enander, Jonas and Akrami, Yashar and Mortsell, Edvard\n and Renneby, Malin and Solomon, Adam R.\",\n title = \"{Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect in massive bigravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys.Rev.\",\n volume = \"D91\",\n pages = \"084046\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.91.084046\",\n year = \"2015\",\n eprint = \"1501.02140\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n }\n\n@article{Konnig:2014xva,\n author = \"Koennig, Frank and Akrami, Yashar and Amendola, Luca and\n Motta, Mariele and Solomon, Adam R.\",\n title = \"{Stable and unstable cosmological models in bimetric\n massive gravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D90\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"124014\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.90.124014\",\n eprint = \"1407.4331\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1407.4331;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Comelli:2014bqa,\n author = \"Comelli, D. and Crisostomi, M. and Pilo, L.\",\n title = \"{FRW Cosmological Perturbations in Massive Bigravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D90\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"084003\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.90.084003\",\n eprint = \"1403.5679\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-PH-TH-2014-045\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1403.5679;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Solomon:2014dua,\n author = \"Solomon, Adam R. and Akrami, Yashar and Koivisto, Tomi\n S.\",\n title = \"{Linear growth of structure in massive bigravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1410\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"066\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/066\",\n eprint = \"1404.4061\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"NORDITA-2014-46\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1404.4061;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Konnig:2014dna,\n author = \"Koennig, Frank and Amendola, Luca\",\n title = \"{Instability in a minimal bimetric gravity model}\",\n journal = \"Phys.Rev.\",\n volume = \"D90\",\n pages = \"044030\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.90.044030\",\n year = \"2014\",\n eprint = \"1402.1988\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1402.1988;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{Berezhiani:2013dw,\n author = \"Berezhiani, Lasha and Chkareuli, Giga and Gabadadze,\n Gregory\",\n title = \"{Restricted Galileons}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D88\",\n year = \"2013\",\n pages = \"124020\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.88.124020\",\n eprint = \"1302.0549\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1302.0549;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Konnig:2013gxa,\n author = \"Koennig, Frank and Patil, Aashay and Amendola, Luca\",\n title = \"{Viable cosmological solutions in massive bimetric\n gravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1403\",\n pages = \"029\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2014/03/029\",\n year = \"2014\",\n eprint = \"1312.3208\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1312.3208;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{Volkov:2013roa,\n author = \"Volkov, Mikhail S.\",\n title = \"{Self-accelerating cosmologies and hairy black holes in\n ghost-free bigravity and massive gravity}\",\n journal = \"Class.Quant.Grav.\",\n volume = \"30\",\n pages = \"184009\",\n doi = \"10.1088/0264-9381/30/18/184009\",\n year = \"2013\",\n eprint = \"1304.0238\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1304.0238;%%\",\n}\n\n\n@article{Fasiello:2013woa,\n author = \"Fasiello, Matteo and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{Cosmological Stability Bound in Massive Gravity and\n Bigravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1312\",\n pages = \"002\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2013/12/002\",\n year = \"2013\",\n eprint = \"1308.1647\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1308.1647;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{Narikawa:2014fua,\nauthor = \"Narikawa, Tatsuya and Ueno, Koh and Tagoshi, Hideyuki and\nTanaka, Takahiro and Kanda, Nobuyuki and Nakamura,\nTakashi\",\ntitle = \"{Detectability of bigravity with graviton oscillations\nusing gravitational wave observations}\",\njournal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\nvolume = \"D91\",\nyear = \"2015\",\npages = \"062007\",\ndoi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.91.062007\",\neprint = \"1412.8074\",\narchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\nprimaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\nreportNumber = \"OUTAP-365, KUNS-2549, YITP-15-20\",\nSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1412.8074;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{DeFelice:2013nba,\n author = \"De Felice, Antonio and Nakamura, Takashi and Tanaka,\n Takahiro\",\n title = \"{Possible existence of viable models of bi-gravity with\n detectable graviton oscillations by gravitational wave\n detectors}\",\n journal = \"PTEP\",\n volume = \"2014\",\n pages = \"043E01\",\n doi = \"10.1093/ptep/ptu024\",\n year = \"2014\",\n eprint = \"1304.3920\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1304.3920;%%\",\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{Akrami:2013pna,\n author = \"Akrami, Yashar and Koivisto, Tomi S. and Sandstad, Marit\",\n title = \"{Cosmological constraints on ghost-free bigravity:\n background dynamics and late-time acceleration}\",\n booktitle = \"{Proceedings, 13th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent\n Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General\n Relativity, Astrophysics, and Relativistic Field Theories\n (MG13): Stockholm, Sweden, July 1-7, 2012}\",\n year = \"2015\",\n url = \"https://inspirehep.net/record/1220533/files/arXiv:1302.5268.pdf\",\n pages = \"1252-1254\",\n doi = \"10.1142/9789814623995_0138\",\n eprint = \"1302.5268\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1302.5268;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Sakakihara:2012iq,\n author = \"Sakakihara, Yuki and Soda, Jiro and Takahashi, Tomohiro\",\n title = \"{On Cosmic No-hair in Bimetric Gravity and the Higuchi\n Bound}\",\n journal = \"PTEP\",\n volume = \"2013\",\n pages = \"033E02\",\n doi = \"10.1093/ptep/ptt004\",\n year = \"2013\",\n eprint = \"1211.5976\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1211.5976;%%\",\n}\n\n\n@article{Akrami:2012vf,\n author = \"Akrami, Yashar and Koivisto, Tomi S. and Sandstad, Marit\",\n title = \"{Accelerated expansion from ghost-free bigravity: a\n statistical analysis with improved generality}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"1303\",\n pages = \"099\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP03(2013)099\",\n year = \"2013\",\n eprint = \"1209.0457\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1209.0457;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{Berg:2012kn,\n author = \"Berg, Marcus and Buchberger, Igor and Enander, Jonas and\n Mortsell, Edvard and Sjors, Stefan\",\n title = \"{Growth Histories in Bimetric Massive Gravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1212\",\n pages = \"021\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2012/12/021\",\n year = \"2012\",\n eprint = \"1206.3496\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1206.3496;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{Ijjas:2017pei,\n author = \"Ijjas, Anna\",\n title = \"{Space-time slicing in Horndeski theories and its implications for non-singular bouncing solutions}\",\n eprint = \"1710.05990\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2018/02/007\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"02\",\n pages = \"007\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n@article{Comelli:2011zm,\n author = \"Comelli, D. and Crisostomi, M. and Nesti, F. and Pilo,\n L.\",\n title = \"{FRW Cosmology in Ghost Free Massive Gravity}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"1203\",\n pages = \"067\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP06(2012)020, 10.1007/JHEP03(2012)067\",\n year = \"2012\",\n eprint = \"1111.1983\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1111.1983;%%\",\n}\n\n\n@article{Volkov:2011an,\n author = \"Volkov, Mikhail S.\",\n title = \"{Cosmological solutions with massive gravitons in the\n bigravity theory}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"1201\",\n pages = \"035\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP01(2012)035\",\n year = \"2012\",\n eprint = \"1110.6153\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1110.6153;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{Noller:2013yja,\n author = \"Noller, Johannes and Scargill, James H. C. and Ferreira,\n Pedro G.\",\n title = \"{Interacting spin-2 fields in the Stückelberg picture}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1402\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"007\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2014/02/007\",\n eprint = \"1311.7009\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1311.7009;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Hu:2013twa,\n author = \"Hu, Bin and Raveri, Marco and Frusciante, Noemi and\n Silvestri, Alessandra\",\n title = \"{Effective Field Theory of Cosmic Acceleration: an\n implementation in CAMB}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D89\",\n year = \"2014\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"103530\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.89.103530\",\n eprint = \"1312.5742\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1312.5742;%%\"\n}\n@article{Lesgourgues:2011re,\n author = \"Lesgourgues, Julien\",\n title = \"{The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I:\n Overview}\",\n year = \"2011\",\n eprint = \"1104.2932\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.IM\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1104.2932;%%\"\n}\n@article{Blas:2011rf,\n author = \"Blas, Diego and Lesgourgues, Julien and Tram, Thomas\",\n title = \"{The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II:\n Approximation schemes}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1107\",\n year = \"2011\",\n pages = \"034\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2011/07/034\",\n eprint = \"1104.2933\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-PH-TH-2011-082, LAPTH-010-11\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1104.2933;%%\"\n}\n@article{Bellini:2019syt,\n author = \"Bellini, Emilio and Sawicki, Ignacy and Zumalac\\'arregui, Miguel\",\n title = \"{hi\\_class: Background Evolution, Initial Conditions and Approximation Schemes}\",\n eprint = \"1909.01828\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2020/02/008\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"02\",\n pages = \"008\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n@article{Lewis:1999bs,\n author = \"Lewis, Antony and Challinor, Anthony and Lasenby,\n Anthony\",\n title = \"{Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW\n models}\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J.\",\n volume = \"538\",\n year = \"2000\",\n pages = \"473-476\",\n doi = \"10.1086/309179\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/9911177\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ASTRO-PH/9911177;%%\"\n}\n@article{Zumalacarregui:2016pph,\n author = \"Zumalac\\'arregui, Miguel and Bellini, Emilio and Sawicki,\n Ignacy and Lesgourgues, Julien and Ferreira, Pedro G.\",\n title = \"{hi\\_class: Horndeski in the Cosmic Linear Anisotropy\n Solving System}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1708\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"08\",\n pages = \"019\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2017/08/019\",\n eprint = \"1605.06102\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"NORDITA-2016-41\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1605.06102;%%\"\n}\n@article{Amendola:2012ky,\n author = \"Amendola, Luca and Kunz, Martin and Motta, Mariele and\n Saltas, Ippocratis D. and Sawicki, Ignacy\",\n title = \"{Observables and unobservables in dark energy\n cosmologies}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D87\",\n year = \"2013\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"023501\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.87.023501\",\n eprint = \"1210.0439\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1210.0439;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Creminelli:2008wc,\n author = \"Creminelli, Paolo and D'Amico, Guido and Norena, Jorge\n and Vernizzi, Filippo\",\n title = \"{The Effective Theory of Quintessence: the w<-1 Side\n Unveiled}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"0902\",\n year = \"2009\",\n pages = \"018\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2009/02/018\",\n eprint = \"0811.0827\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0811.0827;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Gubitosi:2012hu,\n author = \"Gubitosi, Giulia and Piazza, Federico and Vernizzi,\n Filippo\",\n title = \"{The Effective Field Theory of Dark Energy}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1302\",\n year = \"2013\",\n pages = \"032\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2013/02/032\",\n note = \"[JCAP1302,032(2013)]\",\n eprint = \"1210.0201\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1210.0201;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Bloomfield:2012ff,\n author = \"Bloomfield, Jolyon K. and Flanagan, Eanna E. and Park,\n Minjoon and Watson, Scott\",\n title = \"{Dark energy or modified gravity? An effective field\n theory approach}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1308\",\n year = \"2013\",\n pages = \"010\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2013/08/010\",\n eprint = \"1211.7054\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1211.7054;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Bloomfield:2013efa,\n author = \"Bloomfield, Jolyon\",\n title = \"{A Simplified Approach to General Scalar-Tensor\n Theories}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1312\",\n year = \"2013\",\n pages = \"044\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2013/12/044\",\n eprint = \"1304.6712\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1304.6712;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Gleyzes:2014rba,\n author = \"Gleyzes, Jérôme and Langlois, David and Vernizzi,\n Filippo\",\n title = \"{A unifying description of dark energy}\",\n journal = \"Int. J. Mod. Phys.\",\n volume = \"D23\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"13\",\n pages = \"1443010\",\n doi = \"10.1142/S021827181443010X\",\n eprint = \"1411.3712\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1411.3712;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Battye:2012eu,\n author = \"Battye, Richard A. and Pearson, Jonathan A.\",\n title = \"{Effective action approach to cosmological perturbations\n in dark energy and modified gravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1207\",\n year = \"2012\",\n pages = \"019\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/019\",\n eprint = \"1203.0398\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1203.0398;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Battye:2013ida,\n author = \"Battye, Richard A. and Pearson, Jonathan A.\",\n title = \"{Computing model independent perturbations in dark energy\n and modified gravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1403\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"051\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2014/03/051\",\n eprint = \"1311.6737\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1311.6737;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Baker:2012zs,\n author = \"Baker, Tessa and Ferreira, Pedro G. and Skordis,\n Constantinos\",\n title = \"{The Parameterized Post-Friedmann framework for theories\n of modified gravity: concepts, formalism and examples}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D87\",\n year = \"2013\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"024015\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.87.024015\",\n eprint = \"1209.2117\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1209.2117;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{GalInf,\n author = \"Burrage, Clare and de Rham, Claudia and Seery, David and\n Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{Galileon inflation}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1101\",\n year = \"2011\",\n pages = \"014\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2011/01/014\",\n eprint = \"1009.2497\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"DESY-10-132\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1009.2497;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Zuntz:2011aq,\n author = \"Zuntz, Joe and Baker, Tessa and Ferreira, Pedro and\n Skordis, Constantinos\",\n title = \"{Ambiguous Tests of General Relativity on Cosmological\n Scales}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1206\",\n year = \"2012\",\n pages = \"032\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2012/06/032\",\n eprint = \"1110.3830\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1110.3830;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Porrati:2004yi,\n author = \"Porrati, M. and Rombouts, J. W.\",\n title = \"{Strong coupling vs. 4-D locality in induced gravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D69\",\n year = \"2004\",\n pages = \"122003\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.69.122003\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0401211\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = HEP-TH/0401211;%%\"\n}\n@article{Nicolis:2004qq,\n author = \"Nicolis, Alberto and Rattazzi, Riccardo\",\n title = \"{Classical and quantum consistency of the DGP model}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n year = \"2004\",\n pages = \"059\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2004/06/059\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0404159\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM-CSIC-04-13, CERN-PH-TH-2004-063\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = HEP-TH/0404159;%%\"\n}\n@article{Endlich:2010zj,\n author = \"Endlich, Solomon and Hinterbichler, Kurt and Hui, Lam and\n Nicolis, Alberto and Wang, Junpu\",\n title = \"{Derrick's theorem beyond a potential}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n year = \"2011\",\n pages = \"073\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP05(2011)073\",\n eprint = \"1002.4873\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1002.4873;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Skordis:2015yra,\n author = \"Skordis, C. and Pourtsidou, A. and Copeland, E. J.\",\n title = \"{Parametrized post-Friedmannian framework for interacting\n dark energy theories}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D91\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"083537\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.91.083537\",\n eprint = \"1502.07297\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1502.07297;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Noller:2014sta,\n author = \"Noller, Johannes and Melville, Scott\",\n title = \"{The coupling to matter in Massive, Bi- and\n Multi-Gravity}\",\n year = \"2014\",\n eprint = \"1408.5131\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1408.5131;%%\",\n}\n\n\n@article{deRham:2014naa,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Heisenberg, Lavinia and Ribeiro,\n Raquel H.\",\n title = \"{On couplings to matter in massive (bi-)gravity}\",\n journal = \"Class.Quant.Grav.\",\n volume = \"32\",\n pages = \"035022\",\n doi = \"10.1088/0264-9381/32/3/035022\",\n year = \"2015\",\n eprint = \"1408.1678\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1408.1678;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{Comelli:2012db,\n author = \"Comelli, D. and Crisostomi, M. and Pilo, L.\",\n title = \"{Perturbations in Massive Gravity Cosmology}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"1206\",\n pages = \"085\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP06(2012)085\",\n year = \"2012\",\n eprint = \"1202.1986\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1202.1986;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{Blas:2009my,\n author = \"Blas, D. and Comelli, D. and Nesti, F. and Pilo, L.\",\n title = \"{Lorentz Breaking Massive Gravity in Curved Space}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D80\",\n year = \"2009\",\n pages = \"044025\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.80.044025\",\n eprint = \"0905.1699\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0905.1699;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{ArkaniHamed:2002sp,\n author = \"Arkani-Hamed, Nima and Georgi, Howard and Schwartz,\n Matthew D.\",\n title = \"{Effective field theory for massive gravitons and gravity\n in theory space}\",\n journal = \"Annals Phys.\",\n volume = \"305\",\n year = \"2003\",\n pages = \"96-118\",\n doi = \"10.1016/S0003-4916(03)00068-X\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0210184\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"HUTP-02-A051\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = HEP-TH/0210184;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Creminelli:2005qk,\n author = \"Creminelli, Paolo and Nicolis, Alberto and Papucci,\n Michele and Trincherini, Enrico\",\n title = \"{Ghosts in massive gravity}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"09\",\n year = \"2005\",\n pages = \"003\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2005/09/003\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0505147\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"HUTP-05-A0020, HD-THEP-05-09, UCB-PTH-05-14, LBNL-57558\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = HEP-TH/0505147;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Boulware:1973my,\n author = \"Boulware, D.G. and Deser, Stanley\",\n title = \"{Can gravitation have a finite range?}\",\n journal = \"Phys.Rev.\",\n volume = \"D6\",\n pages = \"3368-3382\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.6.3368\",\n year = \"1972\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = PHRVA,D6,3368;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{deRham:2010kj,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Gabadadze, Gregory and Tolley,\n Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{Resummation of Massive Gravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys.Rev.Lett.\",\n volume = \"106\",\n pages = \"231101\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.231101\",\n year = \"2011\",\n eprint = \"1011.1232\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1011.1232;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{Cusin:2014psa,\n author = \"Cusin, Giulia and Durrer, Ruth and Guarato, Pietro and\n Motta, Mariele\",\n title = \"{Gravitational waves in bigravity cosmology}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n number = \"05\",\n volume = \"1505\",\n pages = \"030\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2015/05/030\",\n year = \"2015\",\n eprint = \"1412.5979\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1412.5979;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{Cusin:2015tmf,\n author = \"Cusin, Giulia and Durrer, Ruth and Guarato, Pietro and\n Motta, Mariele\",\n title = \"{A general mass term for bigravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1604\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"04\",\n pages = \"051\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/051\",\n eprint = \"1512.02131\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1512.02131;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{vonStrauss:2011mq,\n author = \"von Strauss, Mikael and Schmidt-May, Angnis and Enander,\n Jonas and Mortsell, Edvard and Hassan, S.F.\",\n title = \"{Cosmological Solutions in Bimetric Gravity and their\n Observational Tests}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1203\",\n pages = \"042\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2012/03/042\",\n year = \"2012\",\n eprint = \"1111.1655\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1111.1655;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{Lagos:2014lca,\n author = \"Lagos, Macarena and Ferreira, Pedro G.\",\n title = \"{Cosmological perturbations in massive bigravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1412\",\n \t number = {12},\n pages = \"026\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2014/12/026\",\n year = \"2014\",\n eprint = \"1410.0207\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1410.0207;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{deRham:2010ik,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Gabadadze, Gregory\",\n title = \"{Generalization of the Fierz-Pauli Action}\",\n journal = \"Phys.Rev.\",\n volume = \"D82\",\n pages = \"044020\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.82.044020\",\n year = \"2010\",\n eprint = \"1007.0443\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"NYU-TH-06-13-10\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1007.0443;%%\",\n}\n@article{deRham:2010kj,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Gabadadze, Gregory and Tolley,\n Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{Resummation of Massive Gravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"106\",\n year = \"2011\",\n pages = \"231101\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.231101\",\n eprint = \"1011.1232\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1011.1232;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Hassan:2011hr,\n author = \"Hassan, S.F. and Rosen, Rachel A.\",\n title = \"{Resolving the Ghost Problem in non-Linear Massive\n Gravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys.Rev.Lett.\",\n volume = \"108\",\n pages = \"041101\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.041101\",\n year = \"2012\",\n eprint = \"1106.3344\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1106.3344;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{Hassan:2011zd,\n author = \"Hassan, S.F. and Rosen, Rachel A.\",\n title = \"{Bimetric Gravity from Ghost-free Massive Gravity}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"1202\",\n pages = \"126\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP02(2012)126\",\n year = \"2012\",\n eprint = \"1109.3515\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1109.3515;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{Banados:2010ix,\n author = \"Banados, Maximo and Ferreira, Pedro G.\",\n title = \"{Eddington's theory of gravity and its progeny}\",\n journal = \"Phys.Rev.Lett.\",\n volume = \"105\",\n pages = \"011101\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.011101\",\n year = \"2010\",\n eprint = \"1006.1769\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1006.1769;%%\",\n}\n\n@article{PhysRevD.89.024034,\n title = {Noether identities and gauge fixing the action for cosmological perturbations},\n author = {Lagos, Macarena and Ba\\~nados, M\\'aximo and Ferreira, Pedro G. and Garc\\'ia-S\\'aenz, Sebasti\\'an},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. D},\n volume = {89},\n issue = {2},\n pages = {024034},\n numpages = {13},\n year = {2014},\n month = {Jan},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevD.89.024034},\n url = {http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.024034}\n}\n\n\n@article{Vollick:2003qp,\n author = \"Vollick, Dan N.\",\n title = \"{Palatini approach to Born-Infeld-Einstein theory and a\n geometric description of electrodynamics}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D69\",\n year = \"2004\",\n pages = \"064030\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.69.064030\",\n eprint = \"gr-qc/0309101\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = GR-QC/0309101;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{deRham:2013tfa,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Matas, Andrew and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{New Kinetic Interactions for Massive Gravity?}\",\n journal = \"Class. Quant. Grav.\",\n volume = \"31\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"165004\",\n doi = \"10.1088/0264-9381/31/16/165004\",\n eprint = \"1311.6485\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1311.6485;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Kimura:2013ika,\n author = \"Kimura, Rampei and Yamauchi, Daisuke\",\n title = \"{Derivative interactions in de Rham-Gabadadze-Tolley\n massive gravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D88\",\n year = \"2013\",\n pages = \"084025\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.88.084025\",\n eprint = \"1308.0523\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n reportNumber = \"RESCEU-40-13\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1308.0523;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Hinterbichler:2013eza,\n author = \"Hinterbichler, Kurt\",\n title = \"{Ghost-Free Derivative Interactions for a Massive\n Graviton}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"10\",\n year = \"2013\",\n pages = \"102\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP10(2013)102\",\n eprint = \"1305.7227\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1305.7227;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Folkerts:2011ev,\n author = \"Folkerts, Sarah and Pritzel, Alexander and Wintergerst,\n Nico\",\n title = \"{On ghosts in theories of self-interacting massive spin-2 particles}\",\n year = \"2011\",\n eprint = \"1107.3157\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"LMU-ASC-30-11\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1107.3157;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Lagos:2016wyv,\n author = \"Lagos, Macarena and Baker, Tessa and Ferreira, Pedro G.\n and Noller, Johannes\",\n title = \"{A general theory of linear cosmological perturbations:\n scalar-tensor and vector-tensor theories}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1608\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"08\",\n pages = \"007\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2016/08/007\",\n eprint = \"1604.01396\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1604.01396;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Allys:2015sht,\n author = \"Allys, Erwan and Peter, Patrick and Rodriguez, Yeinzon\",\n title = \"{Generalized Proca action for an Abelian vector field}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1602\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"02\",\n pages = \"004\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2016/02/004\",\n eprint = \"1511.03101\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"PI-UAN-2015-589FT\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1511.03101;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Jimenez:2016isa,\n author = \"Beltran Jimenez, Jose and Heisenberg, Lavinia\",\n title = \"{Derivative self-interactions for a massive vector\n field}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett.\",\n volume = \"B757\",\n year = \"2016\",\n pages = \"405-411\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.physletb.2016.04.017\",\n eprint = \"1602.03410\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1602.03410;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Heisenberg:2014rta,\n author = \"Heisenberg, Lavinia\",\n title = \"{Generalization of the Proca Action}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1405\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"015\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2014/05/015\",\n eprint = \"1402.7026\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1402.7026;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Silvestri:2013ne,\n author = \"Silvestri, Alessandra and Pogosian, Levon and Buniy,\n Roman V.\",\n title = \"{Practical approach to cosmological perturbations in\n modified gravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D87\",\n year = \"2013\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"104015\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.87.104015\",\n eprint = \"1302.1193\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1302.1193;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Amin:2007wi,\n author = \"Amin, Mustafa A. and Wagoner, Robert V. and Blandford,\n Roger D.\",\n title = \"{A sub-horizon framework for probing the relationship\n between the cosmological matter distribution and metric\n perturbations}\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"390\",\n year = \"2008\",\n pages = \"131-142\",\n eprint = \"0708.1793\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"SLAC-PUB-12749\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0708.1793;%%\"\n}\n@article{Ade:2015rim,\n author = \"Ade, P. A. R. and others\",\n title = \"{Planck 2015 results. XIV. Dark energy and modified\n gravity}\",\n collaboration = \"Planck\",\n year = \"2015\",\n eprint = \"1502.01590\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1502.01590;%%\"\n}\n@article{Weinberg:2008hq,\n author = \"Weinberg, Steven\",\n title = \"{Effective Field Theory for Inflation}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D77\",\n year = \"2008\",\n pages = \"123541\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.77.123541\",\n eprint = \"0804.4291\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"UTTG-01-08\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0804.4291;%%\"\n}\n@article{Ferraro:2014msa,\n author = \"Ferraro, Simone and Sherwin, Blake D. and Spergel, David N.\",\n title = \"{WISE measurement of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect}\",\n eprint = \"1401.1193\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.91.083533\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"91\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"083533\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n\n@article{ALEPH:2010aa,\n author = \"LEP Electroweak Working Group\",\n title = \"{Precision Electroweak Measurements and Constraints on\n the Standard Model}\",\n collaboration = \"Tevatron Electroweak Working Group, CDF, DELPHI, SLD\n Electroweak and Heavy Flavour Groups, ALEPH, LEP\n Electroweak Working Group, SLD, OPAL, D0, L3\",\n year = \"2010\",\n eprint = \"1012.2367\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ex\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-PH-EP-2010-095, FERMILAB-TM-2480-PPD,\n LEPEWWG-2010-01, TEVEWWG-2010-01,\n ALEPH-2010-001-PHYSICS-2010-001, CDF-NOTE-10338,\n D0-NOTE-6130, DELPHI-DELPHI-2010-001-PHYS-952,\n L3-NOTE-2837, OPAL-PR432, SLAC-PUB-14301\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1012.2367;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Horndeski:1974wa,\n author = \"Horndeski, Gregory Walter\",\n title = \"{Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a\n four-dimensional space}\",\n journal = \"Int. J. Theor. Phys.\",\n volume = \"10\",\n year = \"1974\",\n pages = \"363-384\",\n doi = \"10.1007/BF01807638\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = IJTPB,10,363;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Deffayet:2009wt,\n author = \"Deffayet, C. and Esposito-Farese, Gilles and Vikman, A.\",\n title = \"{Covariant Galileon}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D79\",\n year = \"2009\",\n pages = \"084003\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.79.084003\",\n eprint = \"0901.1314\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0901.1314;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{deRham:2010eu,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{DBI and the Galileon reunited}\",\n eprint = \"1003.5917\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2010/05/015\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"015\",\n year = \"2010\"\n}\n\n@article{Burrage:2010cu,\n author = \"Burrage, Clare and de Rham, Claudia and Seery, David and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{Galileon inflation}\",\n eprint = \"1009.2497\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"DESY-10-132\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2011/01/014\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"01\",\n pages = \"014\",\n year = \"2011\"\n}\n\n@article{Jordan:1959eg,\n author = \"Jordan, Pascual\",\n title = \"{The present state of Dirac's cosmological hypothesis}\",\n journal = \"Z. Phys.\",\n volume = \"157\",\n year = \"1959\",\n pages = \"112-121\",\n doi = \"10.1007/BF01375155\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ZEPYA,157,112;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Brans:1961sx,\n author = \"Brans, C. and Dicke, R. H.\",\n title = \"{Mach's principle and a relativistic theory of\n gravitation}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"124\",\n year = \"1961\",\n pages = \"925-935\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRev.124.925\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = PHRVA,124,925;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Tattersall:2017eav,\n author = \"Tattersall, Oliver J. and Lagos, Macarena and Ferreira,\n Pedro G.\",\n title = \"{Covariant approach to parametrized cosmological\n perturbations}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D96\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"064011\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.96.064011\",\n eprint = \"1706.10091\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1706.10091;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Brans:1962zz,\n author = \"Brans, C. H.\",\n title = \"{Mach's Principle and a Relativistic Theory of\n Gravitation. II}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"125\",\n year = \"1962\",\n pages = \"2194-2201\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRev.125.2194\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = PHRVA,125,2194;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Crisostomi:2016czh,\n author = \"Crisostomi, Marco and Koyama, Kazuya and Tasinato,\n Gianmassimo\",\n title = \"{Extended Scalar-Tensor Theories of Gravity}\",\n year = \"2016\",\n eprint = \"1602.03119\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1602.03119;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Ballesteros:2016gwc,\n author = \"Ballesteros, Guillermo and Comelli, Denis and Pilo,\n Luigi\",\n title = \"{Massive and modified gravity as self-gravitating media}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D94\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"12\",\n pages = \"124023\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.94.124023\",\n eprint = \"1603.02956\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-TH-2016-043\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1603.02956;%%\"\n}\n@article{Langlois:2017mxy,\n author = \"Langlois, David and Mancarella, Michele and Noui, Karim\n and Vernizzi, Filippo\",\n title = \"{Effective Description of Higher-Order Scalar-Tensor\n Theories}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1705\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"05\",\n pages = \"033\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2017/05/033\",\n eprint = \"1703.03797\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1703.03797;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Langlois:2015cwa,\n author = \"Langlois, David and Noui, Karim\",\n title = \"{Degenerate higher derivative theories beyond Horndeski:\n evading the Ostrogradski instability}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1602\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"02\",\n pages = \"034\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2016/02/034\",\n eprint = \"1510.06930\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1510.06930;%%\"\n}\n@article{Achour:2016rkg,\n author = \"Achour, Jibril Ben and Langlois, David and Noui, Karim\",\n title = \"{Degenerate higher order scalar-tensor theories beyond\n Horndeski and disformal transformations}\",\n year = \"2016\",\n eprint = \"1602.08398\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1602.08398;%%\"\n}\n@article{Gleyzes:2014dya,\n author = \"Gleyzes, J√©r√¥me and Langlois, David and Piazza,\n Federico and Vernizzi, Filippo\",\n title = \"{Healthy theories beyond Horndeski}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"114\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"21\",\n pages = \"211101\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.211101\",\n eprint = \"1404.6495\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1404.6495;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Gleyzes:2014qga,\n author = \"Gleyzes, J√©r√¥me and Langlois, David and Piazza,\n Federico and Vernizzi, Filippo\",\n title = \"{Exploring gravitational theories beyond Horndeski}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1502\",\n year = \"2015\",\n pages = \"018\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2015/02/018\",\n eprint = \"1408.1952\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1408.1952;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Zumalacarregui:2013pma,\n author = \"Zumalac\\'arregui, Miguel and Garcia-Bellido, Juan\",\n title = \"{Transforming gravity: from derivative couplings to\n matter to second-order scalar-tensor theories beyond the\n Horndeski Lagrangian}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D89\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"064046\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.89.064046\",\n eprint = \"1308.4685\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM-CSIC-13-090\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1308.4685;%%\"\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Amendola:2012ys,\n author = \"Amendola, Luca and others\",\n title = \"{Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid\n satellite}\",\n collaboration = \"Euclid Theory Working Group\",\n journal = \"Living Rev. Rel.\",\n volume = \"16\",\n year = \"2013\",\n pages = \"6\",\n doi = \"10.12942/lrr-2013-6\",\n eprint = \"1206.1225\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1206.1225;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Nguyen:2023fip,\n author = \"Nguyen, Nhat-Minh and Huterer, Dragan and Wen, Yuewei\",\n title = \"{Evidence for Suppression of Structure Growth in the Concordance Cosmological Model}\",\n eprint = \"2302.01331\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"LCTP-23-03\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.111001\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"131\",\n number = \"11\",\n pages = \"111001\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{EFTCAMB1,\n author = {{Hu}, B. and {Raveri}, M. and {Frusciante}, N. and {Silvestri}, A.\n\t},\n title = \"{Effective field theory of cosmic acceleration: An implementation in CAMB}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\narchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n eprint = {1312.5742},\n keywords = {Cosmology, Post-Newtonian approximation, perturbation theory, related approximations, Dark energy},\n year = 2014,\n month = may,\n volume = 89,\n number = 10,\n eid = {103530},\n pages = {103530},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevD.89.103530},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PhRvD..89j3530H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{EFTCAMB2,\n author = {{Raveri}, M. and {Hu}, B. and {Frusciante}, N. and {Silvestri}, A.\n\t},\n title = \"{Effective field theory of cosmic acceleration: Constraining dark energy with CMB data}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\narchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n eprint = {1405.1022},\n keywords = {Cosmology, Particle-theory and field-theory models of the early Universe},\n year = 2014,\n month = aug,\n volume = 90,\n number = 4,\n eid = {043513},\n pages = {043513},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevD.90.043513},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PhRvD..90d3513R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@article{Berti:2015itd,\n author = \"Berti, Emanuele and others\",\n title = \"{Testing General Relativity with Present and Future\n Astrophysical Observations}\",\n journal = \"Class. Quant. Grav.\",\n volume = \"32\",\n year = \"2015\",\n pages = \"243001\",\n doi = \"10.1088/0264-9381/32/24/243001\",\n eprint = \"1501.07274\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1501.07274;%%\"\n}\n@article{Kogan:2000cv,\n author = \"Kogan, Ian I. and Ross, Graham G.\",\n title = \"{Brane universe and multigravity: Modification of gravity\n at large and small distances}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett.\",\n volume = \"B485\",\n year = \"2000\",\n pages = \"255-262\",\n doi = \"10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00687-0\",\n note = \"[,2274(2000)]\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0003074\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"OUTP-00-08-P\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = HEP-TH/0003074;%%\"\n}\n@article{Banados:2008fj,\n author = \"Banados, M. and Ferreira, P. G. and Skordis, C.\",\n title = \"{Eddington-Born-Infeld gravity and the large scale\n structure of the Universe}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D79\",\n year = \"2009\",\n pages = \"063511\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.79.063511\",\n eprint = \"0811.1272\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"PI-COSMO-102\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0811.1272;%%\"\n}\n@article{Caldwell:2007cw,\n author = \"Caldwell, Robert and Cooray, Asantha and Melchiorri,\n Alessandro\",\n title = \"{Constraints on a New Post-General Relativity\n Cosmological Parameter}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D76\",\n year = \"2007\",\n pages = \"023507\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.76.023507\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0703375\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"ASTRO-PH\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ASTRO-PH/0703375;%%\"\n}\n@article{Dossett:2011tn,\n author = \"Dossett, Jason N. and Ishak, Mustapha and Moldenhauer,\n Jacob\",\n title = \"{Testing General Relativity at Cosmological Scales:\n Implementation and Parameter Correlations}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D84\",\n year = \"2011\",\n pages = \"123001\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.84.123001\",\n eprint = \"1109.4583\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1109.4583;%%\"\n}\n@article{Zhao:2008bn,\n author = \"Zhao, Gong-Bo and Pogosian, Levon and Silvestri,\n Alessandra and Zylberberg, Joel\",\n title = \"{Searching for modified growth patterns with tomographic\n surveys}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D79\",\n year = \"2009\",\n pages = \"083513\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.79.083513\",\n eprint = \"0809.3791\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0809.3791;%%\"\n}\n@article{Hojjati:2011ix,\n author = \"Hojjati, Alireza and Pogosian, Levon and Zhao, Gong-Bo\",\n title = \"{Testing gravity with CAMB and CosmoMC}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1108\",\n year = \"2011\",\n pages = \"005\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2011/08/005\",\n eprint = \"1106.4543\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1106.4543;%%\"\n}\n@article{Bertschinger:2008zb,\n author = \"Bertschinger, Edmund and Zukin, Phillip\",\n title = \"{Distinguishing Modified Gravity from Dark Energy}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D78\",\n year = \"2008\",\n pages = \"024015\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.78.024015\",\n eprint = \"0801.2431\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0801.2431;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Pogosian:2010tj,\n author = \"Pogosian, Levon and Silvestri, Alessandra and Koyama,\n Kazuya and Zhao, Gong-Bo\",\n title = \"{How to optimally parametrize deviations from General\n Relativity in the evolution of cosmological\n perturbations?}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D81\",\n year = \"2010\",\n pages = \"104023\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.81.104023\",\n eprint = \"1002.2382\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1002.2382;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Bean:2010zq,\n author = \"Bean, Rachel and Tangmatitham, Matipon\",\n title = \"{Current constraints on the cosmic growth history}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D81\",\n year = \"2010\",\n pages = \"083534\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.81.083534\",\n eprint = \"1002.4197\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1002.4197;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Dossett:2011tn,\n author = \"Dossett, Jason N. and Ishak, Mustapha and Moldenhauer,\n Jacob\",\n title = \"{Testing General Relativity at Cosmological Scales:\n Implementation and Parameter Correlations}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D84\",\n year = \"2011\",\n pages = \"123001\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.84.123001\",\n eprint = \"1109.4583\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1109.4583;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Kunz:2006ca,\n author = \"Kunz, Martin and Sapone, Domenico\",\n title = \"{Dark Energy versus Modified Gravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"98\",\n year = \"2007\",\n pages = \"121301\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.121301\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0612452\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ASTRO-PH/0612452;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Baker:2011jy,\n author = \"Baker, Tessa and Ferreira, Pedro G. and Skordis,\n Constantinos and Zuntz, Joe\",\n title = \"{Towards a fully consistent parameterization of modified\n gravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D84\",\n year = \"2011\",\n pages = \"124018\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.84.124018\",\n eprint = \"1107.0491\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1107.0491;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Baker:2012zs,\n author = \"Baker, Tessa and Ferreira, Pedro G. and Skordis,\n Constantinos\",\n title = \"{The Parameterized Post-Friedmann framework for theories\n of modified gravity: concepts, formalism and examples}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D87\",\n year = \"2013\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"024015\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.87.024015\",\n eprint = \"1209.2117\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1209.2117;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Battye:2012eu,\n author = \"Battye, Richard A. and Pearson, Jonathan A.\",\n title = \"{Effective action approach to cosmological perturbations\n in dark energy and modified gravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1207\",\n year = \"2012\",\n pages = \"019\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/019\",\n eprint = \"1203.0398\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1203.0398;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Battye:2013ida,\n author = \"Battye, Richard A. and Pearson, Jonathan A.\",\n title = \"{Computing model independent perturbations in dark energy\n and modified gravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1403\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"051\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2014/03/051\",\n eprint = \"1311.6737\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1311.6737;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Zlosnik:2006zu,\n author = \"Zlosnik, T. G and Ferreira, P. G and Starkman, G. D\",\n title = \"{Modifying gravity with the Aether: An alternative to\n Dark Matter}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D75\",\n year = \"2007\",\n pages = \"044017\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.75.044017\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0607411\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ASTRO-PH/0607411;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Zuntz:2010jp,\n author = \"Zuntz, J. and Zlosnik, T. G and Bourliot, F. and\n Ferreira, P. G. and Starkman, G. D.\",\n title = \"{Vector field models of modified gravity and the dark\n sector}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D81\",\n year = \"2010\",\n pages = \"104015\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.81.104015\",\n eprint = \"1002.0849\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1002.0849;%%\"\n}\n@article{Zlosnik:2007bu,\n author = \"Zlosnik, T. G and Ferreira, P. G. and Starkman, G. D.\",\n title = \"{Growth of structure in theories with a dynamical\n preferred frame}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D77\",\n year = \"2008\",\n pages = \"084010\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.77.084010\",\n eprint = \"0711.0520\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0711.0520;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Gripaios:2004ms,\n author = \"Gripaios, B. M.\",\n title = \"{Modified gravity via spontaneous symmetry breaking}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"10\",\n year = \"2004\",\n pages = \"069\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2004/10/069\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0408127\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = HEP-TH/0408127;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Jacobson:2000xp,\n author = \"Jacobson, Ted and Mattingly, David\",\n title = \"{Gravity with a dynamical preferred frame}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D64\",\n year = \"2001\",\n pages = \"024028\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.64.024028\",\n eprint = \"gr-qc/0007031\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = GR-QC/0007031;%%\"\n}\n@article{DeFelice:2016yws,\n author = \"De Felice, Antonio and Heisenberg, Lavinia and Kase,\n Ryotaro and Mukohyama, Shinji and Tsujikawa, Shinji and\n Zhang, Ying-li\",\n title = \"{Cosmology in generalized Proca theories}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1606\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"06\",\n pages = \"048\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2016/06/048\",\n eprint = \"1603.05806\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n reportNumber = \"YITP-16-36, IPMU16-0032\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1603.05806;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Creminelli:2008wc,\n author = \"Creminelli, Paolo and D'Amico, Guido and Norena, Jorge\n and Vernizzi, Filippo\",\n title = \"{The Effective Theory of Quintessence: the w<-1 Side\n Unveiled}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"0902\",\n year = \"2009\",\n pages = \"018\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2009/02/018\",\n eprint = \"0811.0827\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0811.0827;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Rubakov:2008nh,\n author = \"Rubakov, V. A. and Tinyakov, P. G.\",\n title = \"{Infrared-modified gravities and massive gravitons}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Usp.\",\n volume = \"51\",\n year = \"2008\",\n pages = \"759-792\",\n doi = \"10.1070/PU2008v051n08ABEH006600\",\n eprint = \"0802.4379\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"ULB-TH-08-07\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0802.4379;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Dubovsky:2004sg,\n author = \"Dubovsky, S. L.\",\n title = \"{Phases of massive gravity}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"10\",\n year = \"2004\",\n pages = \"076\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2004/10/076\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0409124\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = HEP-TH/0409124;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Rubakov:2004eb,\n author = \"Rubakov, V. A.\",\n title = \"{Lorentz-violating graviton masses: Getting around\n ghosts, low strong coupling scale and VDVZ discontinuity}\",\n year = \"2004\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0407104\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"INR-TH-39-2004\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = HEP-TH/0407104;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Jacobson:2000xp,\n author = \"Jacobson, Ted and Mattingly, David\",\n title = \"{Gravity with a dynamical preferred frame}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D64\",\n year = \"2001\",\n pages = \"024028\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.64.024028\",\n eprint = \"gr-qc/0007031\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = GR-QC/0007031;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Skordis:2015yra,\n author = \"Skordis, C. and Pourtsidou, A. and Copeland, E. J.\",\n title = \"{Parametrized post-Friedmannian framework for interacting\n dark energy theories}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D91\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"083537\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.91.083537\",\n eprint = \"1502.07297\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1502.07297;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Gleyzes:2015pma,\n author = \"Gleyzes, J√©r√¥me and Langlois, David and Mancarella,\n Michele and Vernizzi, Filippo\",\n title = \"{Effective Theory of Interacting Dark Energy}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1508\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"08\",\n pages = \"054\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2015/08/054\",\n eprint = \"1504.05481\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1504.05481;%%\"\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{1992PhR...215..203M,\n author = {{Mukhanov}, V.~F. and {Feldman}, H.~A. and {Brandenberger}, R.~H.\n\t},\n title = \"{Theory of cosmological perturbations}\",\n journal = {Physics Reports},\n year = 1992,\n month = jun,\n volume = 215,\n pages = {203-333},\n doi = {10.1016/0370-1573(92)90044-Z},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992PhR...215..203M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@article{Deser:2007jk,\n author = \"Deser, Stanley and Woodard, R. P.\",\n title = \"{Nonlocal Cosmology}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"99\",\n year = \"2007\",\n pages = \"111301\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.111301\",\n eprint = \"0706.2151\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"UFIFT-QG-07-03, BRX-TH-589\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0706.2151;%%\"\n}\n@article{Maggiore:2016gpx,\n author = \"Maggiore, Michele\",\n title = \"{Nonlocal Infrared Modifications of Gravity. A Review}\",\n journal = \"Fundam. Theor. Phys.\",\n volume = \"187\",\n year = \"2017\",\n pages = \"221-281\",\n doi = \"10.1007/978-3-319-51700-1_16\",\n eprint = \"1606.08784\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1606.08784;%%\"\n}\n@article{Sotiriou:2008rp,\n author = \"Sotiriou, Thomas P. and Faraoni, Valerio\",\n title = \"{f(R) Theories Of Gravity}\",\n journal = \"Rev. Mod. Phys.\",\n volume = \"82\",\n year = \"2010\",\n pages = \"451-497\",\n doi = \"10.1103/RevModPhys.82.451\",\n eprint = \"0805.1726\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0805.1726;%%\"\n}\n@article{Woodard:2006nt,\n author = \"Woodard, Richard P.\",\n title = \"{Avoiding dark energy with 1/r modifications of gravity}\",\n booktitle = \"{The invisible universe: Dark matter and dark energy.\n Proceedings, 3rd Aegean School, Karfas, Greece, September\n 26-October 1, 2005}\",\n journal = \"Lect. Notes Phys.\",\n volume = \"720\",\n year = \"2007\",\n pages = \"403-433\",\n doi = \"10.1007/978-3-540-71013-4_14\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0601672\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"UFIFT-QG-06-02\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ASTRO-PH/0601672;%%\"\n}\n%%%%%\n@BOOK{1993tegp.book.....W,\n author = {{Will}, C.~M.},\n title = \"{Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics}\",\nbooktitle = {Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics, by Clifford M.~Will, pp.~396.~ISBN 0521439736.~Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, March 1993.},\n year = 1993,\n month = mar,\n pages = {396},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993tegp.book.....W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@article{Bellini:2014fua,\n author = \"Bellini, Emilio and Sawicki, Ignacy\",\n title = \"{Maximal freedom at minimum cost: linear large-scale\n structure in general modifications of gravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1407\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"050\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2014/07/050\",\n eprint = \"1404.3713\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1404.3713;%%\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Gergely:2014rna,\n author = \"Gergely, L√°szl√≥ √Å. and Tsujikawa, Shinji\",\n title = \"{Effective field theory of modified gravity with two\n scalar fields: dark energy and dark matter}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D89\",\n year = \"2014\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"064059\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.89.064059\",\n eprint = \"1402.0553\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1402.0553;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Renk:2016olm,\n author = \"Renk, Janina and Zumalac\\'arregui, Miguel and Montanari,\n Francesco\",\n title = \"{Gravity at the horizon: on relativistic effects, CMB-LSS\n correlations and ultra-large scales in Horndeski's\n theory}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1607\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"07\",\n pages = \"040\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2016/07/040\",\n eprint = \"1604.03487\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"NORDITA-2016-26, HIP-2016-15-TH\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1604.03487;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Ma:1995ey,\n author = \"Ma, Chung-Pei and Bertschinger, Edmund\",\n title = \"{Cosmological perturbation theory in the synchronous and\n conformal Newtonian gauges}\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J.\",\n volume = \"455\",\n year = \"1995\",\n pages = \"7-25\",\n doi = \"10.1086/176550\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/9506072\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ASTRO-PH/9506072;%%\"\n}\n@article{Bettoni:2015wta,\n\tauthor = \"Bettoni, Dario and Zumalac\\'arregui, Miguel\",\n\ttitle = \"{Kinetic mixing in scalar-tensor theories of gravity}\",\n\tjournal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n\tvolume = \"D91\",\n\tyear = \"2015\",\n\tpages = \"104009\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.91.104009\",\n\teprint = \"1502.02666\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n\treportNumber = \"NORDITA-2015-51\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1502.02666;%%\"\n}\n@article{Wang:2012kj,\n\tauthor = \"Wang, Junpu and Hui, Lam and Khoury, Justin\",\n\ttitle = \"{No-Go Theorems for Generalized Chameleon Field\n\tTheories}\",\n\tjournal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n\tvolume = \"109\",\n\tyear = \"2012\",\n\tpages = \"241301\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.241301\",\n\teprint = \"1208.4612\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1208.4612;%%\"\n}\n@article{Jimenez:2016isa,\n author = \"Beltran Jimenez, Jose and Heisenberg, Lavinia\",\n title = \"{Derivative self-interactions for a massive vector\n field}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett.\",\n volume = \"B757\",\n year = \"2016\",\n pages = \"405-411\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.physletb.2016.04.017\",\n eprint = \"1602.03410\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1602.03410;%%\"\n}\n@article{Allys:2015sht,\n author = \"Allys, Erwan and Peter, Patrick and Rodriguez, Yeinzon\",\n title = \"{Generalized Proca action for an Abelian vector field}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1602\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"02\",\n pages = \"004\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2016/02/004\",\n eprint = \"1511.03101\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"PI-UAN-2015-589FT\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1511.03101;%%\"\n}\n@article{Ade:2014zfo,\n\tauthor = \"Ade, P. A. R. and others\",\n\ttitle = \"{Planck intermediate results - XXIV. Constraints on\n\tvariations in fundamental constants}\",\n\tcollaboration = \"Planck\",\n\tjournal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n\tvolume = \"580\",\n\tyear = \"2015\",\n\tpages = \"A22\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/201424496\",\n\teprint = \"1406.7482\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1406.7482;%%\"\n}\n@article{Uzan:2010pm,\n\tauthor = \"Uzan, Jean-Philippe\",\n\ttitle = \"{Varying Constants, Gravitation and Cosmology}\",\n\tjournal = \"Living Rev. Rel.\",\n\tvolume = \"14\",\n\tyear = \"2011\",\n\tpages = \"2\",\n\tdoi = \"10.12942/lrr-2011-2\",\n\teprint = \"1009.5514\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1009.5514;%%\"\n}\n@article{Luty:2003vm,\n\tauthor = \"Luty, Markus A. and Porrati, Massimo and Rattazzi,\n\tRiccardo\",\n\ttitle = \"{Strong interactions and stability in the DGP model}\",\n\tjournal = \"JHEP\",\n\tvolume = \"09\",\n\tyear = \"2003\",\n\tpages = \"029\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2003/09/029\",\n\teprint = \"hep-th/0303116\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n\treportNumber = \"CERN-TH-2003-044, UMD-PP-03-041\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = HEP-TH/0303116;%%\"\n}\n@article{Goon:2016ihr,\n\tauthor = \"Goon, Garrett and Hinterbichler, Kurt and Joyce, Austin\n\tand Trodden, Mark\",\n\ttitle = \"{Aspects of Galileon Non-Renormalization}\",\n\tjournal = \"JHEP\",\n\tvolume = \"11\",\n\tyear = \"2016\",\n\tpages = \"100\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1007/JHEP11(2016)100\",\n\teprint = \"1606.02295\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1606.02295;%%\"\n}\n@article{Nicolis:2008in,\n\tauthor = \"Nicolis, Alberto and Rattazzi, Riccardo and Trincherini,\n\tEnrico\",\n\ttitle = \"{The Galileon as a local modification of gravity}\",\n\tjournal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n\tvolume = \"D79\",\n\tyear = \"2009\",\n\tpages = \"064036\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.79.064036\",\n\teprint = \"0811.2197\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0811.2197;%%\"\n}\n@article{Pirtskhalava:2015nla,\n\tauthor = \"Pirtskhalava, David and Santoni, Luca and Trincherini,\n\tEnrico and Vernizzi, Filippo\",\n\ttitle = \"{Weakly Broken Galileon Symmetry}\",\n\tjournal = \"JCAP\",\n\tvolume = \"1509\",\n\tyear = \"2015\",\n\tnumber = \"09\",\n\tpages = \"007\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2015/09/007\",\n\teprint = \"1505.00007\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1505.00007;%%\"\n}\n@article{Saltas:2016awg,\n\tauthor = \"Saltas, Ippocratis D. and Vitagliano, Vincenzo\",\n\ttitle = \"{Quantum corrections for the cubic Galileon in the\n\tcovariant language}\",\n\tjournal = \"JCAP\",\n\tvolume = \"1705\",\n\tyear = \"2017\",\n\tnumber = \"05\",\n\tpages = \"020\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2017/05/020\",\n\teprint = \"1612.08953\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1612.08953;%%\"\n}\n@article{Moore:2001bv,\n\tauthor = \"Moore, Guy D. and Nelson, Ann E.\",\n\ttitle = \"{Lower bound on the propagation speed of gravity from\n\tgravitational Cherenkov radiation}\",\n\tjournal = \"JHEP\",\n\tvolume = \"09\",\n\tyear = \"2001\",\n\tpages = \"023\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2001/09/023\",\n\teprint = \"hep-ph/0106220\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n\treportNumber = \"UW-PT-01-18\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = HEP-PH/0106220;%%\"\n}\n@article{Blas:2016qmn,\n\tauthor = \"Blas, Diego and Ivanov, Mikhail M. and Sawicki, Ignacy\n\tand Sibiryakov, Sergey\",\n\ttitle = \"{On constraining the speed of gravitational waves\n\tfollowing GW150914}\",\n\tjournal = \"JETP Lett.\",\n\tvolume = \"103\",\n\tyear = \"2016\",\n\tnumber = \"10\",\n\tpages = \"624-626\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1134/S0021364016100040, 10.7868/S0370274X16100039\",\n\tnote = \"[Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.103,no.10,708(2016)]\",\n\teprint = \"1602.04188\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n\treportNumber = \"CERN-TH-2016-034, INR-TH-2016-005\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1602.04188;%%\"\n}\n@article{Cornish:2017jml,\n\tauthor = \"Cornish, Neil and Blas, Diego and Nardini, Germano\",\n\ttitle = \"{Bounding the speed of gravity with gravitational wave\n\tobservations}\",\n\tyear = \"2017\",\n\teprint = \"1707.06101\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n\treportNumber = \"CERN-TH-2017-140\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1707.06101;%%\"\n}\n@article{Deffayet:2011gz,\n\tauthor = \"Deffayet, C. and Gao, Xian and Steer, D. A. and\n\tZahariade, G.\",\n\ttitle = \"{From k-essence to generalised Galileons}\",\n\tjournal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n\tvolume = \"D84\",\n\tyear = \"2011\",\n\tpages = \"064039\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.84.064039\",\n\teprint = \"1103.3260\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1103.3260;%%\"\n}\n@article{DeFelice:2011bh,\n\tauthor = \"De Felice, Antonio and Tsujikawa, Shinji\",\n\ttitle = \"{Conditions for the cosmological viability of the most\n\tgeneral scalar-tensor theories and their applications to\n\textended Galileon dark energy models}\",\n\tjournal = \"JCAP\",\n\tvolume = \"1202\",\n\tyear = \"2012\",\n\tpages = \"007\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2012/02/007\",\n\teprint = \"1110.3878\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1110.3878;%%\"\n}\n@article{Deffayet:2010qz,\n\tauthor = \"Deffayet, Cedric and Pujolas, Oriol and Sawicki, Ignacy\n\tand Vikman, Alexander\",\n\ttitle = \"{Imperfect Dark Energy from Kinetic Gravity Braiding}\",\n\tjournal = \"JCAP\",\n\tvolume = \"1010\",\n\tyear = \"2010\",\n\tpages = \"026\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2010/10/026\",\n\teprint = \"1008.0048\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n\treportNumber = \"CERN-PH-TH-2010-166\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1008.0048;%%\"\n}\n@article{Pujolas:2011he,\n\tauthor = \"Pujolas, Oriol and Sawicki, Ignacy and Vikman, Alexander\",\n\ttitle = \"{The Imperfect Fluid behind Kinetic Gravity Braiding}\",\n\tjournal = \"JHEP\",\n\tvolume = \"11\",\n\tyear = \"2011\",\n\tpages = \"156\",\n\tdoi = \"10.1007/JHEP11(2011)156\",\n\teprint = \"1103.5360\",\n\tarchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n\tprimaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n\treportNumber = \"CERN-PH-TH-2010-210\",\n\tSLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1103.5360;%%\"\n}\n@article{Kimura:2011td,\n author = \"Kimura, Rampei and Kobayashi, Tsutomu and Yamamoto, Kazuhiro\",\n title = \"{Observational Constraints on Kinetic Gravity Braiding from the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe Effect}\",\n eprint = \"1110.3598\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.85.123503\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"85\",\n pages = \"123503\",\n year = \"2012\"\n}\n\n@article{Hastings:1970,\n\tAbstract = {A generalization of the sampling method introduced by Metropolis et al. (1953) is presented along with an exposition of the relevant theory, techniques of application and methods and difficulties of assessing the error in Monte Carlo estimates. Examples of the methods, including the generation of random orthogonal matrices and potential applications of the methods to numerical problems arising in statistics, are discussed.},\n\tAuthor = {W. K. Hastings},\n\tDate-Added = {2018-06-14 15:48:51 +0000},\n\tDate-Modified = {2018-06-14 15:49:02 +0000},\n\tIssn = {00063444},\n\tJournal = {Biometrika},\n\tNumber = {1},\n\tPages = {97--109},\n\tPublisher = {[Oxford University Press, Biometrika Trust]},\n\tTitle = {Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications},\n\tUrl = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2334940},\n\tVolume = {57},\n\tYear = {1970},\n\tBdsk-Url-1 = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2334940}}\n\n@article{Metropolis:1953,\n\tAbstract = {A general method, suitable for fast computing machines, for investigating such properties as equations of state for substances consisting of interacting individual molecules is described. The method consists of a modified Monte Carlo integration over configuration space. Results for the two-dimensional rigid-sphere system have been obtained on the Los Alamos MANIAC and are presented here. These results are compared to the free volume equation of state and to a four-term virial coefficient expansion.},\n\tAdsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System},\n\tAdsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1953JChPh..21.1087M},\n\tAuthor = {{Metropolis}, N. and {Rosenbluth}, A.~W. and {Rosenbluth}, M.~N. and {Teller}, A.~H. and {Teller}, E.},\n\tDate-Added = {2018-06-14 15:47:06 +0000},\n\tDate-Modified = {2018-06-14 15:49:41 +0000},\n\tDoi = {10.1063/1.1699114},\n\tJournal = {\\jcp},\n\tMonth = jun,\n\tPages = {1087-1092},\n\tTitle = {{Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines}},\n\tVolume = 21,\n\tYear = 1953,\n\tBdsk-Url-1 = {https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114},\n\tBdsk-Url-2 = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1953JChPh..21.1087M}}\n\n@article{Bird:2012,\n\tAdsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System},\n\tAdsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.420.2551B},\n\tArchiveprefix = {arXiv},\n\tAuthor = {{Bird}, S. and {Viel}, M. and {Haehnelt}, M.~G.},\n\tDate-Added = {2018-06-14 13:34:22 +0000},\n\tDate-Modified = {2018-06-14 13:34:32 +0000},\n\tDoi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20222.x},\n\tEprint = {1109.4416},\n\tJournal = {\\mnras},\n\tKeywords = {neutrinos, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe},\n\tMonth = mar,\n\tPages = {2551-2561},\n\tTitle = {{Massive neutrinos and the non-linear matter power spectrum}},\n\tVolume = 420,\n\tYear = 2012,\n\tBdsk-Url-1 = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20222.x}}\n\n@article{Takahashi:2012,\n\tAdsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System},\n\tAdsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...761..152T},\n\tArchiveprefix = {arXiv},\n\tAuthor = {{Takahashi}, R. and {Sato}, M. and {Nishimichi}, T. and {Taruya}, A. and {Oguri}, M.},\n\tDate-Added = {2018-06-14 13:28:29 +0000},\n\tDate-Modified = {2018-06-14 13:28:46 +0000},\n\tDoi = {10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/152},\n\tEid = {152},\n\tEprint = {1208.2701},\n\tJournal = {\\apj},\n\tKeywords = {cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of universe, methods: numerical},\n\tMonth = dec,\n\tPages = {152},\n\tTitle = {{Revising the Halofit Model for the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum}},\n\tVolume = 761,\n\tYear = 2012,\n\tBdsk-Url-1 = {https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/152}}\n\n@article{Smith:2003,\n\tAbstract = {We present the results of a large library of cosmological N-body simulations, using power-law initial spectra. The non-linear evolution of the matter power spectra is compared with the predictions of existing analytic scaling formulae based on the work of Hamilton et al. The scaling approach has assumed that highly non-linear structures obey `stable clustering' and are frozen in proper coordinates. Our results show that, when transformed under the self-similarity scaling, the scale-free spectra define a non-linear locus that is clearly shallower than would be required under stable clustering. Furthermore, the small-scale non-linear power increases as both the power spectrum index n and the density parameter Omega decrease, and this evolution is not well accounted for by the previous scaling formulae. This breakdown of stable clustering can be understood as resulting from the modification of dark matter haloes by continuing mergers. These effects are naturally included in the analytic `halo model' for non-linear structure; we use this approach to fit both our scale-free results and also our previous cold dark matter data. This method is more accurate than the commonly used Peacock-Dodds formula and should be applicable to more general power spectra. Code to evaluate non-linear power spectra using this method is available from <externallink type=\"url\">http://as1.chem.nottingham.ac.uk/~res/software.html</A>. Following publication, we will make the power-law simulation data publically available through the Virgo website <externallink type=\"url\">http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/Virgo/</A>.},\n\tAdsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System},\n\tAdsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.341.1311S},\n\tArxivurl = {http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0207664},\n\tAuthor = {{Smith}, R.~E. and {Peacock}, J.~A. and {Jenkins}, A. and {White}, S.~D.~M. and {Frenk}, C.~S. and {Pearce}, F.~R. and {Thomas}, P.~A. and {Efstathiou}, G. and {Couchman}, H.~M.~P.},\n\tDate-Added = {2018-06-14 13:26:54 +0000},\n\tDate-Modified = {2018-06-14 13:27:00 +0000},\n\tDoi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06503.x},\n\tEprint = {astro-ph/0207664},\n\tJournal = {\\mnras},\n\tKeywords = {methods: N-body simulations, cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of Universe},\n\tMonth = jun,\n\tPages = {1311-1332},\n\tTitle = {{Stable clustering, the halo model and non-linear cosmological power spectra}},\n\tVolume = 341,\n\tYear = 2003,\n\tBdsk-File-1 = {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},\n\tBdsk-Url-1 = {https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06503.x},\n\tBdsk-Url-2 = {http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0207664},\n\tBdsk-Url-3 = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.341.1311S}}\n\n@article{Dunkley:2009,\n\tAdsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System},\n\tAdsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..180..306D},\n\tArchiveprefix = {arXiv},\n\tAuthor = {{Dunkley}, J. and {Komatsu}, E. and {Nolta}, M.~R. and {Spergel}, D.~N. and {Larson}, D. and {Hinshaw}, G. and {Page}, L. and {Bennett}, C.~L. and {Gold}, B. and {Jarosik}, N. and {Weiland}, J.~L. and {Halpern}, M. and {Hill}, R.~S. and {Kogut}, A. and {Limon}, M. and {Meyer}, S.~S. and {Tucker}, G.~S. and {Wollack}, E. and {Wright}, E.~L.},\n\tDate-Added = {2018-06-14 12:45:09 +0000},\n\tDate-Modified = {2018-06-14 12:45:21 +0000},\n\tDoi = {10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/306},\n\tEprint = {0803.0586},\n\tJournal = {\\apjs},\n\tKeywords = {cosmic microwave background, cosmology: observations, early universe, polarization},\n\tMonth = feb,\n\tPages = {306-329},\n\tTitle = {{Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Observations: Likelihoods and Parameters from the WMAP Data}},\n\tVolume = 180,\n\tYear = 2009,\n\tBdsk-Url-1 = {https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/306}}\n\n@article{Cole:2005,\n\tAbstract = {We present a power-spectrum analysis of the final 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS), employing a direct Fourier method. The sample used comprises 221414 galaxies with measured redshifts. We investigate in detail the modelling of the sample selection, improving on previous treatments in a number of respects. A new angular mask is derived, based on revisions to the photometric calibration. The redshift selection function is determined by dividing the survey according to rest-frame colour, and deducing a self-consistent treatment of k-corrections and evolution for each population. The covariance matrix for the power-spectrum estimates is determined using two different approaches to the construction of mock surveys, which are used to demonstrate that the input cosmological model can be correctly recovered. We discuss in detail the possible differences between the galaxy and mass power spectra, and treat these using simulations, analytic models and a hybrid empirical approach. Based on these investigations, we are confident that the 2dFGRS power spectrum can be used to infer the matter content of the universe. On large scales, our estimated power spectrum shows evidence for the `baryon oscillations' that are predicted in cold dark matter (CDM) models. Fitting to a CDM model, assuming a primordial ns= 1 spectrum, h= 0.72 and negligible neutrino mass, the preferred parameters are Omegamh= 0.168 +/- 0.016 and a baryon fraction Omegab/Omegam= 0.185 +/- 0.046 (1sigma errors). The value of Omegamh is 1sigma lower than the 0.20 +/- 0.03 in our 2001 analysis of the partially complete 2dFGRS. This shift is largely due to the signal from the newly sampled regions of space, rather than the refinements in the treatment of observational selection. This analysis therefore implies a density significantly below the standard Omegam= 0.3: in combination with cosmic microwave background (CMB) data from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), we infer Omegam= 0.231 +/- 0.021.},\n\tAdsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System},\n\tAdsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.362..505C},\n\tArxivurl = {http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0501174},\n\tAuthor = {{Cole}, S. and {Percival}, W.~J. and {Peacock}, J.~A. and {Norberg}, P. and {Baugh}, C.~M. and {Frenk}, C.~S. and {Baldry}, I. and {Bland-Hawthorn}, J. and {Bridges}, T. and {Cannon}, R. and {Colless}, M. and {Collins}, C. and {Couch}, W. and {Cross}, N.~J.~G. and {Dalton}, G. and {Eke}, V.~R. and {De Propris}, R. and {Driver}, S.~P. and {Efstathiou}, G. and {Ellis}, R.~S. and {Glazebrook}, K. and {Jackson}, C. and {Jenkins}, A. and {Lahav}, O. and {Lewis}, I. and {Lumsden}, S. and {Maddox}, S. and {Madgwick}, D. and {Peterson}, B.~A. and {Sutherland}, W. and {Taylor}, K.},\n\tDate-Added = {2018-06-14 12:42:58 +0000},\n\tDate-Modified = {2018-06-14 12:43:05 +0000},\n\tDoi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09318.x},\n\tEprint = {astro-ph/0501174},\n\tJournal = {\\mnras},\n\tKeywords = {cosmological parameters, large-scale structure of Universe},\n\tMonth = sep,\n\tPages = {505-534},\n\tTitle = {{The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: power-spectrum analysis of the final data set and cosmological implications}},\n\tVolume = 362,\n\tYear = 2005,\n\tBdsk-File-1 = {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},\n\tBdsk-Url-1 = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09318.x},\n\tBdsk-Url-2 = {http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0501174},\n\tBdsk-Url-3 = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.362..505C}}\n\n@article{Anderson:2014,\n author = \"Anderson, Lauren and others\",\n collaboration = \"BOSS\",\n title = \"{The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the Data Releases 10 and 11 Galaxy samples}\",\n eprint = \"1312.4877\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stu523\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"441\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"24--62\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n\n@article{Ross:2015,\n author = \"Ross, Ashley J. and Samushia, Lado and Howlett, Cullan and Percival, Will J. and Burden, Angela and Manera, Marc\",\n title = \"{The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample \\textendash{} I. A 4 per cent distance measure at $z = 0.15$}\",\n eprint = \"1409.3242\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stv154\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"449\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"835--847\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n\n@article{Tegmark:2006,\n\tAdsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System},\n\tAdsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006PhRvD..74l3507T},\n\tAuthor = {{Tegmark et al.}, M.},\n\tDate-Added = {2018-05-18 22:10:55 +0000},\n\tDate-Modified = {2018-05-18 22:11:23 +0000},\n\tDoi = {10.1103/PhysRevD.74.123507},\n\tEid = {123507},\n\tEprint = {astro-ph/0608632},\n\tJournal = {\\prd},\n\tKeywords = {Observational cosmology},\n\tMonth = dec,\n\tNumber = 12,\n\tPages = {123507},\n\tTitle = {{Cosmological constraints from the SDSS luminous red galaxies}},\n\tVolume = 74,\n\tYear = 2006,\n\tBdsk-Url-1 = {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.123507}}\n\n@article{Beutler:2012,\n author = \"Beutler, Florian and Blake, Chris and Colless, Matthew and Jones, D. Heath and Staveley-Smith, Lister and Poole, Gregory B. and Campbell, Lachlan and Parker, Quentin and Saunders, Will and Watson, Fred\",\n title = \"{The 6dF Galaxy Survey: $z \\approx 0$ measurement of the growth rate and $\\sigma_8$}\",\n eprint = \"1204.4725\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21136.x\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"423\",\n pages = \"3430--3444\",\n year = \"2012\"\n}\n\n@article{Samushia:2014,\n author = \"Samushia, Lado and others\",\n title = \"{The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measuring growth rate and geometry with anisotropic clustering}\",\n eprint = \"1312.4899\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stu197\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"439\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"3504--3519\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n\n%Planck-Collaboration:2016aa\n@article{Planck:2015mym,\n author = \"Ade, P. A. R. and others\",\n collaboration = \"Planck\",\n title = \"{Planck 2015 results. XV. Gravitational lensing}\",\n eprint = \"1502.01591\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/201525941\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"594\",\n pages = \"A15\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n%Planck-Collaboration:2016ad\n@article{Planck:2015mrs,\n author = \"Adam, R. and others\",\n collaboration = \"Planck\",\n title = \"{Planck 2015 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results}\",\n eprint = \"1502.01582\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/201527101\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"594\",\n pages = \"A1\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n%Planck-Collaboration:2016af\n@article{Planck:2015bpv,\n author = \"Aghanim, N. and others\",\n collaboration = \"Planck\",\n title = \"{Planck 2015 results. XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters}\",\n eprint = \"1507.02704\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/201526926\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"594\",\n pages = \"A11\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n%Planck-Collaboration:2016ae\n@article{Planck:2015fie,\n author = \"Ade, P. A. R. and others\",\n collaboration = \"Planck\",\n title = \"{Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters}\",\n eprint = \"1502.01589\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/201525830\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"594\",\n pages = \"A13\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n@article{PhysRevLett.51.1609,\n title = {Experimental Test of the Variability of $G$ Using Viking Lander Ranging Data},\n author = {Hellings, R. W. and Adams, P. J. and Anderson, J. D. and Keesey, M. S. and Lau, E. L. and Standish, E. M. and Canuto, V. M. and Goldman, I.},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},\n volume = {51},\n issue = {18},\n pages = {1609--1612},\n numpages = {0},\n year = {1983},\n month = {Oct},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1609},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1609}\n}\n\n@article{Brinckmann:2018cvx,\n author = \"Brinckmann, Thejs and Lesgourgues, Julien\",\n title = \"{MontePython 3: boosted MCMC sampler and other features}\",\n year = \"2018\",\n eprint = \"1804.07261\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1804.07261;%%\"\n}\n@article{Audren:2012wb,\n author = \"Audren, Benjamin and Lesgourgues, Julien and Benabed,\n Karim and Prunet, Simon\",\n title = \"{Conservative Constraints on Early Cosmology: an\n illustration of the Monte Python cosmological parameter\n inference code}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1302\",\n pages = \"001\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2013/02/001\",\n year = \"2013\",\n eprint = \"1210.7183\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-PH-TH-2012-290, LAPTH-048-12\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1210.7183;%%\",\n}\n@article{corner,\n Author = {Daniel Foreman-Mackey},\n Doi = {10.21105/joss.00024},\n Title = {corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in Python},\n Journal = {The Journal of Open Source Software},\n Year = 2016,\n Volume = 24,\n Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.45906}\n}\n\n@article{Arai:2017hxj,\n author = \"Arai, Shun and Nishizawa, Atsushi\",\n title = \"{Generalized framework for testing gravity with\n gravitational-wave propagation. II. Constraints on\n Horndeski theory}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D97\",\n year = \"2018\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"104038\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.97.104038\",\n eprint = \"1711.03776\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1711.03776;%%\"\n}\n@article{Mancini:2018qtb,\n author = \"Spurio Mancini, A. and Reischke, R. and Pettorino, V. and\n Schafer, B. M. and Zumalac\\'arregui, M.\",\n title = \"{Testing (modified) gravity with 3D and tomographic\n cosmic shear}\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"480\",\n year = \"2018\",\n pages = \"3725\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/sty2092\",\n eprint = \"1801.04251\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1801.04251;%%\"\n}\n@article{Frusciante:2018jzw,\n author = \"Frusciante, Noemi and Peirone, Simone and Casas, Santiago\n and Lima, Nelson A.\",\n title = \"{The road ahead of Horndeski: cosmology of surviving\n scalar-tensor theories}\",\n year = \"2018\",\n eprint = \"1810.10521\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1810.10521;%%\"\n}\n@article{Kase:2014cwa,\n author = \"Kase, Ryotaro and Tsujikawa, Shinji\",\n title = \"{Effective field theory approach to modified gravity\n including Horndeski theory and Horava-Lifshitz\n gravity}\",\n journal = \"Int. J. Mod. Phys.\",\n volume = \"D23\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"13\",\n pages = \"1443008\",\n doi = \"10.1142/S0218271814430081\",\n eprint = \"1409.1984\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1409.1984;%%\"\n}\n@article{Gleyzes:2015rua,\n author = \"Gleyzes, Jérôme and Langlois, David and Mancarella,\n Michele and Vernizzi, Filippo\",\n title = \"{Effective Theory of Dark Energy at Redshift Survey\n Scales}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1602\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"02\",\n pages = \"056\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2016/02/056\",\n eprint = \"1509.02191\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-PH-TH-2015-223\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1509.02191;%%\"\n}\n@article{Raveri:2014cka,\n author = \"Raveri, Marco and Hu, Bin and Frusciante, Noemi and\n Silvestri, Alessandra\",\n title = \"{Effective Field Theory of Cosmic Acceleration:\n constraining dark energy with CMB data}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D90\",\n year = \"2014\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"043513\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.90.043513\",\n eprint = \"1405.1022\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1405.1022;%%\"\n}\n@article{DeFelice:2015isa,\n author = \"De Felice, Antonio and Koyama, Kazuya and Tsujikawa,\n Shinji\",\n title = \"{Observational signatures of the theories beyond\n Horndeski}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1505\",\n year = \"2015\",\n number = \"05\",\n pages = \"058\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2015/05/058\",\n eprint = \"1503.06539\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1503.06539;%%\"\n}\n@article{Creminelli:2018xsv,\n author = \"Creminelli, Paolo and Lewandowski, Matthew and Tambalo,\n Giovanni and Vernizzi, Filippo\",\n title = \"{Gravitational Wave Decay into Dark Energy}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1812\",\n year = \"2018\",\n number = \"12\",\n pages = \"025\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2018/12/025\",\n eprint = \"1809.03484\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1809.03484;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Monitor:2017mdv,\n author = \"Abbott, B. P. and others\",\n title = \"{Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron\n Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A}\",\n collaboration = \"LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi-GBM, INTEGRAL\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J.\",\n volume = \"848\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"L13\",\n doi = \"10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c\",\n eprint = \"1710.05834\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.HE\",\n reportNumber = \"LIGO-P1700308\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1710.05834;%%\"\n}\n@article{TheLIGOScientific:2017qsa,\n author = \"Abbott, B.P. and others\",\n title = \"{GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a\n Binary Neutron Star Inspiral}\",\n collaboration = \"LIGO Scientific, Virgo\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"119\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"16\",\n pages = \"161101\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101\",\n eprint = \"1710.05832\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n reportNumber = \"LIGO-P170817\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1710.05832;%%\"\n}\n@article{GBM:2017lvd,\n author = \"Abbott, B. P. and others\",\n title = \"{Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star\n Merger}\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J. Lett.\",\n volume = \"848\",\n year = \"2017\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"L12\",\n doi = \"10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9\",\n eprint = \"1710.05833\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.HE\",\n reportNumber = \"LIGO-P1700294, VIR-0802A-17, FERMILAB-PUB-17-478-A-AE-CD\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1710.05833;%%\"\n}\n@article{Akrami:2018yjz,\n author = \"Akrami, Yashar and Brax, Philippe and Davis,\n Anne-Christine and Vardanyan, Valeri\",\n title = \"{Neutron star merger GW170817 strongly constrains doubly\n coupled bigravity}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D97\",\n year = \"2018\",\n number = \"12\",\n pages = \"124010\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.97.124010\",\n eprint = \"1803.09726\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1803.09726;%%\"\n}\n@article{Heisenberg:2017qka,\n author = \"Heisenberg, Lavinia and Tsujikawa, Shinji\",\n title = \"{Dark energy survivals in massive gravity after GW170817:\n SO(3) invariant}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1801\",\n year = \"2018\",\n number = \"01\",\n pages = \"044\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2018/01/044\",\n eprint = \"1711.09430\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1711.09430;%%\"\n}\n@article{BeltranJimenez:2018ymu,\n author = \"Beltrán Jiménez, Jose and Heisenberg, Lavinia\",\n title = \"{Non-trivial gravitational waves and structure formation\n phenomenology from dark energy}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1809\",\n year = \"2018\",\n number = \"09\",\n pages = \"035\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2018/09/035\",\n eprint = \"1806.01753\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1806.01753;%%\"\n}\n@article{Dvali:2010jz,\n author = \"Dvali, Gia and Giudice, Gian F. and Gomez, Cesar and\n Kehagias, Alex\",\n title = \"{UV-Completion by Classicalization}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"08\",\n year = \"2011\",\n pages = \"108\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP08(2011)108\",\n eprint = \"1010.1415\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-PH-TH-2010-226\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1010.1415;%%\"\n}\n@article{Dvali:2010ns,\n author = \"Dvali, Gia and Pirtskhalava, David\",\n title = \"{Dynamics of Unitarization by Classicalization}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett.\",\n volume = \"B699\",\n year = \"2011\",\n pages = \"78-86\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.physletb.2011.03.054\",\n eprint = \"1011.0114\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1011.0114;%%\"\n}\n@article{Dvali:2011nj,\n author = \"Dvali, Gia\",\n title = \"{Classicalize or not to Classicalize?}\",\n year = \"2011\",\n eprint = \"1101.2661\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1101.2661;%%\"\n}\n@article{Dvali:2011th,\n author = \"Dvali, Gia and Gomez, Cesar and Kehagias, Alex\",\n title = \"{Classicalization of Gravitons and Goldstones}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"11\",\n year = \"2011\",\n pages = \"070\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP11(2011)070\",\n eprint = \"1103.5963\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1103.5963;%%\"\n}\n@article{Vikman:2012bx,\n author = \"Vikman, Alexander\",\n title = \"{Suppressing Quantum Fluctuations in Classicalization}\",\n journal = \"EPL\",\n volume = \"101\",\n year = \"2013\",\n number = \"3\",\n pages = \"34001\",\n doi = \"10.1209/0295-5075/101/34001\",\n eprint = \"1208.3647\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-PH-TH-2012-205\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1208.3647;%%\"\n}\n@article{Kovner:2012yi,\n author = \"Kovner, Alex and Lublinsky, Michael\",\n title = \"{Classicalization and Unitarity}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"11\",\n year = \"2012\",\n pages = \"030\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP11(2012)030\",\n eprint = \"1207.5037\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1207.5037;%%\"\n}\n@article{Bellazzini:2014waa,\n author = \"Bellazzini, Brando and Martucci, Luca and Torre,\n Riccardo\",\n title = \"{Symmetries, Sum Rules and Constraints on Effective Field\n Theories}\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"09\",\n year = \"2014\",\n pages = \"100\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP09(2014)100\",\n eprint = \"1405.2960\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"DFPD-2014-TH-10, LPN14-072\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1405.2960;%%\"\n}\n@article{Kobayashi:2011nu,\n author = \"Kobayashi, Tsutomu and Yamaguchi, Masahide and Yokoyama,\n Jun'ichi\",\n title = \"{Generalized G-inflation: Inflation with the most general\n second-order field equations}\",\n journal = \"Prog. Theor. Phys.\",\n volume = \"126\",\n year = \"2011\",\n pages = \"511-529\",\n doi = \"10.1143/PTP.126.511\",\n eprint = \"1105.5723\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"KUNS-2339, RESCEU-9-11\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1105.5723;%%\"\n}\n@article{Creminelli:2019kjy,\n author = \"Creminelli, Paolo and Tambalo, Giovanni and Vernizzi,\n Filippo and Yingcharoenrat, Vicharit\",\n title = \"{Dark-Energy Instabilities induced by Gravitational\n Waves}\",\n year = \"2019\",\n eprint = \"1910.14035\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1910.14035;%%\"\n}\n@article{Creminelli:2019nok,\n author = \"Creminelli, Paolo and Tambalo, Giovanni and Vernizzi, Filippo and Yingcharoenrat, Vicharit\",\n title = \"{Resonant Decay of Gravitational Waves into Dark Energy}\",\n eprint = \"1906.07015\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/072\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"10\",\n pages = \"072\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n@article{Noller:2020afd,\n author = \"Noller, Johannes\",\n title = \"{Cosmological constraints on dark energy in light of gravitational wave bounds}\",\n eprint = \"2001.05469\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063524\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"101\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"063524\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n@article{Lombriser:2018olq,\n author = \"Lombriser, Lucas and Dalang, Charles and Kennedy, Joe and\n Taylor, Andy\",\n title = \"{Inherently stable effective field theory for dark energy\n and modified gravity}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1901\",\n year = \"2019\",\n number = \"01\",\n pages = \"041\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/041\",\n eprint = \"1810.05225\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1810.05225;%%\"\n}\n@article{Denissenya:2018mqs,\n author = \"Denissenya, Mikhail and Linder, Eric V.\",\n title = \"{Gravity's Islands: Parametrizing Horndeski Stability}\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"1811\",\n year = \"2018\",\n number = \"11\",\n pages = \"010\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2018/11/010\",\n eprint = \"1808.00013\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1808.00013;%%\"\n}\n@article{Jenkins:2006ia,\n author = \"Jenkins, Alejandro and O'Connell, Donal\",\n title = \"{The Story of O: Positivity constraints in effective\n field theories}\",\n year = \"2006\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0609159\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"CALT-68-2607, MIT-CTP-3764\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = HEP-TH/0609159;%%\"\n}\n@article{Adams:2008hp,\n author = \"Adams, Allan and Jenkins, Alejandro and O'Connell, Donal\",\n title = \"{Signs of analyticity in fermion scattering}\",\n year = \"2008\",\n eprint = \"0802.4081\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"MIT-CTP-3834, CALT-68-2645\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:0802.4081;%%\"\n}\n@article{Baumann:2015nta,\n author = \"Baumann, Daniel and Green, Daniel and Lee, Hayden and\n Porto, Rafael A.\",\n title = \"{Signs of Analyticity in Single-Field Inflation}\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev.\",\n volume = \"D93\",\n year = \"2016\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"023523\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.93.023523\",\n eprint = \"1502.07304\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"ICTP-SAIFR-15-252\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1502.07304;%%\"\n}\n\n@article{Barreira:2013jma,\n author = \"Barreira, Alexandre and Li, Baojiu and Sanchez, Ariel and Baugh, Carlton M. and Pascoli, Silvia\",\n title = \"{Parameter space in Galileon gravity models}\",\n eprint = \"1302.6241\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.87.103511\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"87\",\n pages = \"103511\",\n year = \"2013\"\n}\n\n@article{Brax:2014vla,\n author = \"Brax, Philippe and Burrage, Clare and Davis, Anne-Christine and Gubitosi, Giulia\",\n title = \"{Cosmological Tests of Coupled Galileons}\",\n eprint = \"1411.7621\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2015/03/028\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"03\",\n pages = \"028\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n@article{Goon:2020myi,\n author = \"Goon, Garrett and Melville, Scott and Noller, Johannes\",\n title = \"{Quantum corrections to generic branes: DBI, NLSM, and more}\",\n eprint = \"2010.05913\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP01(2021)159\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"01\",\n pages = \"159\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n@article{Heisenberg:2020cyi,\n author = \"Heisenberg, Lavinia and Noller, Johannes and Zosso, Jann\",\n title = \"{Horndeski under the quantum loupe}\",\n eprint = \"2004.11655\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2020/10/010\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"10\",\n pages = \"010\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{deRham:2012ew,\n author = \"de Rham, Claudia and Gabadadze, Gregory and Heisenberg, Lavinia and Pirtskhalava, David\",\n title = \"{Nonrenormalization and naturalness in a class of scalar-tensor theories}\",\n eprint = \"1212.4128\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"UCSD-PTH-12-20, NYU-TH-11-11-12\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.87.085017\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"87\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"085017\",\n year = \"2013\"\n}\n\n@article{Ross:2014qpa,\n author = \"Ross, Ashley J. and Samushia, Lado and Howlett, Cullan and Percival, Will J. and Burden, Angela and Manera, Marc\",\n title = \"{The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample \\textendash{} I. A 4 per cent distance measure at $z = 0.15$}\",\n eprint = \"1409.3242\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stv154\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"449\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"835--847\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n@article{SDSS:2001tew,\n author = \"Becker, Robert H. and others\",\n collaboration = \"SDSS\",\n title = \"{Evidence for Reionization at Z \\textasciitilde{} 6: Detection of a Gunn-Peterson trough in a Z = 6.28 Quasar}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0108097\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-01-471-A\",\n doi = \"10.1086/324231\",\n journal = \"Astron. J.\",\n volume = \"122\",\n pages = \"2850\",\n year = \"2001\"\n}\n\n@article{Barreira:2013jma,\n author = \"Barreira, Alexandre and Li, Baojiu and Sanchez, Ariel and Baugh, Carlton M. and Pascoli, Silvia\",\n title = \"{Parameter space in Galileon gravity models}\",\n eprint = \"1302.6241\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.87.103511\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"87\",\n pages = \"103511\",\n year = \"2013\"\n}\n@article{Okada:2012mn,\n author = \"Okada, Hiroyuki and Totani, Tomonori and Tsujikawa, Shinji\",\n title = \"{Constraints on f(R) theory and Galileons from the latest data of galaxy redshift surveys}\",\n eprint = \"1208.4681\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.87.103002\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"87\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"103002\",\n year = \"2013\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Arjona:2019rfn,\n author = \"Arjona, Rub\\'en and Cardona, Wilmar and Nesseris, Savvas\",\n title = \"{Designing Horndeski and the effective fluid approach}\",\n eprint = \"1904.06294\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-19-051\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.100.063526\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"100\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"063526\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n@article{SpurioMancini:2019rxy,\n author = {Spurio Mancini, A. and K\\\"ohlinger, F. and Joachimi, B. and Pettorino, V. and Sch\\\"afer, B. M. and Reischke, R. and van Uitert, Edo and Brieden, S. and Archidiacono, M. and Lesgourgues, J.},\n title = \"{KiDS + GAMA: constraints on horndeski gravity from combined large-scale structure probes}\",\n eprint = \"1901.03686\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stz2581\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"490\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"2155--2177\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n@article{Bonilla:2019mbm,\n author = \"Bonilla, Alexander and D'Agostino, Rocco and Nunes, Rafael C. and de Araujo, Jos\\'e C. N.\",\n title = \"{Forecasts on the speed of gravitational waves at high $z$}\",\n eprint = \"1910.05631\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/015\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"03\",\n pages = \"015\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Baker:2020apq,\n author = \"Baker, Tessa and Harrison, Ian\",\n title = \"{Constraining Scalar-Tensor Modified Gravity with Gravitational Waves and Large Scale Structure Surveys}\",\n eprint = \"2007.13791\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2021/01/068\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"01\",\n pages = \"068\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Brando:2019xbv,\n author = \"Brando, Guilherme and Falciano, Felipe T. and Linder, Eric V. and Velten, Hermano E. S.\",\n title = \"{Modified gravity away from a $\\Lambda$CDM background}\",\n eprint = \"1904.12903\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2019/11/018\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"11\",\n pages = \"018\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n@article{delaCruz-Dombriz:2008ium,\n author = \"de la Cruz-Dombriz, A. and Dobado, A. and Maroto, Antonio Lopez\",\n title = \"{On the evolution of density perturbations in f(R) theories of gravity}\",\n eprint = \"0802.2999\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.77.123515\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"77\",\n pages = \"123515\",\n year = \"2008\"\n}\n@article{Arai:2019zul,\n author = \"Arai, Shun and Karmakar, Purnendu and Nishizawa, Atsushi\",\n title = \"{Cosmological evolution of viable models in the generalized scalar-tensor theory}\",\n eprint = \"1912.01768\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.102.024003\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"102\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"024003\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n@article{Barreira:2016ovx,\n author = \"Barreira, Alexandre and S\\'anchez, Ariel G. and Schmidt, Fabian\",\n title = \"{Validating estimates of the growth rate of structure with modified gravity simulations}\",\n eprint = \"1605.03965\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.94.084022\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"94\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"084022\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n@article{Taruya:2013quf,\n author = \"Taruya, Atsushi and Koyama, Kazuya and Hiramatsu, Takashi and Oka, Akira\",\n title = \"{Beyond consistency test of gravity with redshift-space distortions at quasilinear scales}\",\n eprint = \"1309.6783\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"YITP-13-93\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.89.043509\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"89\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"043509\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n@article{Babichev:2011iz,\n author = \"Babichev, Eugeny and Deffayet, Cedric and Esposito-Farese, Gilles\",\n title = \"{Constraints on Shift-Symmetric Scalar-Tensor Theories with a Vainshtein Mechanism from Bounds on the Time Variation of G}\",\n eprint = \"1107.1569\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.251102\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"107\",\n pages = \"251102\",\n year = \"2011\"\n}\n@article{Burrage:2020jkj,\n author = \"Burrage, Clare and Dombrowski, Johannes\",\n title = \"{Constraining the cosmological evolution of scalar-tensor theories with local measurements of the time variation of G}\",\n eprint = \"2004.14260\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/060\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"07\",\n pages = \"060\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n@article{Kennedy:2020ehn,\n author = \"Kennedy, Joe and Lombriser, Lucas\",\n title = \"{Positivity bounds on reconstructed Horndeski models}\",\n eprint = \"2003.05318\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.102.044062\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"102\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"044062\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n@article{Frusciante:2019xia,\n author = \"Frusciante, Noemi and Perenon, Louis\",\n title = \"{Effective field theory of dark energy: A review}\",\n eprint = \"1907.03150\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.physrep.2020.02.004\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rept.\",\n volume = \"857\",\n pages = \"1--63\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n@article{Perenon:2019dpc,\n author = \"Perenon, Louis and Bel, Julien and Maartens, Roy and de la Cruz-Dombriz, Alvaro\",\n title = \"{Optimising growth of structure constraints on modified gravity}\",\n eprint = \"1901.11063\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2019/06/020\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n pages = \"020\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n@article{Noller:2013wca,\n author = \"Noller, Johannes and von Braun-Bates, Francesca and Ferreira, Pedro G.\",\n title = \"{Relativistic scalar fields and the quasistatic approximation in theories of modified gravity}\",\n eprint = \"1310.3266\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.89.023521\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"89\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"023521\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n\n@article{Bellini:2015xja,\n author = \"Bellini, Emilio and Cuesta, Antonio J. and Jimenez, Raul and Verde, Licia\",\n title = \"{Constraints on deviations from \\ensuremath{\\Lambda}CDM within Horndeski gravity}\",\n eprint = \"1509.07816\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2016/06/E01\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"02\",\n pages = \"053\",\n year = \"2016\",\n note = \"[Erratum: JCAP 06, E01 (2016)]\"\n}\n\n@article{Noller:2020lav,\n author = \"Noller, Johannes and Santoni, Luca and Trincherini, Enrico and Trombetta, Leonardo G.\",\n title = \"{Scalar-tensor cosmologies without screening}\",\n eprint = \"2008.08649\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2021/01/045\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"01\",\n pages = \"045\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Raveri:2019mxg,\n author = \"Raveri, Marco\",\n title = \"{Reconstructing Gravity on Cosmological Scales}\",\n eprint = \"1902.01366\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083524\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"101\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"083524\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Joudaki:2020shz,\n author = \"Joudaki, Shahab and Ferreira, Pedro G. and Lima, Nelson A. and Winther, Hans A.\",\n title = \"{Testing Gravity on Cosmic Scales: A Case Study of Jordan-Brans-Dicke Theory}\",\n eprint = \"2010.15278\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n month = \"10\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Bellini:2013hea,\n author = \"Bellini, Emilio and Jimenez, Raul\",\n title = \"{The parameter space of Cubic Galileon models for cosmic acceleration}\",\n eprint = \"1306.1262\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.dark.2013.11.001\",\n journal = \"Phys. Dark Univ.\",\n volume = \"2\",\n pages = \"179--183\",\n year = \"2013\"\n}\n@article{Barreira:2014zza,\n author = \"Barreira, Alexandre and Li, Baojiu and Hellwing, Wojciech A. and Lombriser, Lucas and Baugh, Carlton M. and Pascoli, Silvia\",\n title = \"{Halo model and halo properties in Galileon gravity cosmologies}\",\n eprint = \"1401.1497\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2014/04/029\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"04\",\n pages = \"029\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n\n@article{Burrage:2015lla,\n author = \"Burrage, Clare and Parkinson, David and Seery, David\",\n title = \"{Beyond the growth rate of cosmic structure: Testing modified gravity models with an extra degree of freedom}\",\n eprint = \"1502.03710\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.96.043509\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"96\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"043509\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n@article{Neveu:2016gxp,\n author = {Neveu, J. and Ruhlmann-Kleider, V. and Astier, P. and Besan\\c{c}on, M. and Guy, J. and M\\\"oller, A. and Babichev, E.},\n title = \"{Constraining the \\ensuremath{\\Lambda}CDM and Galileon models with recent cosmological data}\",\n eprint = \"1605.02627\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n reportNumber = \"LPT-ORSAY-16-45\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/201628878\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"600\",\n pages = \"A40\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n@article{Leloup:2019fas,\n author = \"Leloup, C. and Ruhlmann-Kleider, V. and Neveu, J. and De Mattia, A.\",\n title = \"{Observational status of the Galileon model general solution from cosmological data and gravitational waves}\",\n eprint = \"1902.07065\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2019/05/011\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"011\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n@article{redshift,\n author = \"Cruickshank, Nathan and Noller, Johannes\",\n title = \"{Probing dark energy with redshift space distortions}\",\n journal = \"to appear\"\n}\n\n@article{Kable:2021yws,\n author = \"Kable, Joshua A. and Benevento, Giampaolo and Frusciante, Noemi and De Felice, Antonio and Tsujikawa, Shinji\",\n title = \"{Probing modified gravity with integrated Sachs-Wolfe CMB and galaxy cross-correlations}\",\n eprint = \"2111.10432\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/002\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"09\",\n pages = \"002\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Baker:2022eiz,\n author = \"Baker, Tessa and Barausse, Enrico and Chen, Anson and de Rham, Claudia and Pieroni, Mauro and Tasinato, Gianmassimo\",\n title = \"{Testing gravitational wave propagation with multiband detections}\",\n eprint = \"2209.14398\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2023/03/044\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"03\",\n pages = \"044\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{Harry:2022zey,\n author = \"Harry, Ian and Noller, Johannes\",\n title = \"{Probing the speed of gravity with LVK, LISA, and joint observations}\",\n eprint = \"2207.10096\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n doi = \"10.1007/s10714-022-03016-0\",\n journal = \"Gen. Rel. Grav.\",\n volume = \"54\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"133\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Sirera:2023pbs,\n author = \"Sirera, Sergi and Noller, Johannes\",\n title = \"{Testing the speed of gravity with black hole ringdowns}\",\n eprint = \"2301.10272\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.107.124054\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"107\",\n number = \"12\",\n pages = \"124054\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{Atkins:2024nvl,\n author = \"Atkins, Bill and Malhotra, Ameek and Tasinato, Gianmassimo\",\n title = \"{Novel probe of graviton dispersion relations at nanohertz frequencies}\",\n eprint = \"2408.10122\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.110.124018\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"110\",\n number = \"12\",\n pages = \"124018\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Giannantonio:2008zi,\n author = \"Giannantonio, Tommaso and Scranton, Ryan and Crittenden, Robert G. and Nichol, Robert C. and Boughn, Stephen P. and Myers, Adam D. and Richards, Gordon T.\",\n title = \"{Combined analysis of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect and cosmological implications}\",\n eprint = \"0801.4380\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.77.123520\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"77\",\n pages = \"123520\",\n year = \"2008\"\n}\n\n@article{Huffenberger:2004tv,\n author = \"Huffenberger, Kevin M. and Seljak, Uros and Makarov, Alexey\",\n title = \"{Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect in WMAP and its effect on cosmological parameters}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0404545\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.70.063002\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"70\",\n pages = \"063002\",\n year = \"2004\"\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Wen:2023bcj,\n author = \"Wen, Yuewei and Nguyen, Nhat-Minh and Huterer, Dragan\",\n title = \"{Sweeping Horndeski canvas: new growth-rate parameterization for modified-gravity theories}\",\n eprint = \"2304.07281\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"LCTP-23-05\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2023/09/028\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"09\",\n pages = \"028\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{Castello:2023zjr,\n author = \"Castello, Sveva and Mancarella, Michele and Grimm, Nastassia and Blanco, Daniel Sobral and Tutusaus, Isaac and Bonvin, Camille\",\n title = \"{Gravitational Redshift Constraints on the Effective Theory of Interacting Dark Energy}\",\n eprint = \"2311.14425\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n month = \"11\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{Sugiyama:2023tes,\n author = \"Sugiyama, Naonori S. and Yamauchi, Daisuke and Kobayashi, Tsutomu and Fujita, Tomohiro and Arai, Shun and Hirano, Shin'ichi and Saito, Shun and Beutler, Florian and Seo, Hee-Jong\",\n title = \"{New constraints on cosmological modified gravity theories from anisotropic three-point correlation functions of BOSS DR12 galaxies}\",\n eprint = \"2302.06808\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stad1505\",\n month = \"2\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{Scott:2022fev,\n author = \"Scott, Bryan R. and Karkare, Kirit S. and Bird, Simeon\",\n title = \"{A forecast for large-scale structure constraints on Horndeski gravity with CO line intensity mapping}\",\n eprint = \"2209.13029\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-22-747-V\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stad1501\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"523\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"4895--4908\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{Melville:2022ykg,\n author = \"Melville, Scott and Noller, Johannes\",\n title = \"{Positivity bounds from multiple vacua and their cosmological consequences}\",\n eprint = \"2202.01222\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2022/06/031\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n number = \"06\",\n pages = \"031\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n@article{Bose:2022vwi,\n author = \"Bose, B. and Tsedrik, M. and Kennedy, J. and Lombriser, L. and Pourtsidou, A. and Taylor, A.\",\n title = \"{Fast and accurate predictions of the nonlinear matter power spectrum for general models of Dark Energy and Modified Gravity}\",\n eprint = \"2210.01094\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stac3783\",\n month = \"10\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Wright:2022krq,\n author = \"Wright, Bill S. and Sen Gupta, Ashim and Baker, Tessa and Valogiannis, Georgios and Fiorini, Bartolomeo\",\n title = \"{Hi-COLA: fast, approximate simulations of structure formation in Horndeski gravity}\",\n eprint = \"2209.01666\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2023/03/040\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"03\",\n pages = \"040\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{Srinivasan:2021gib,\n author = \"Srinivasan, Sankarshana and Thomas, Daniel B. and Pace, Francesco and Battye, Richard\",\n title = \"{Cosmological gravity on all scales. Part II. Model independent modified gravity N-body simulations}\",\n eprint = \"2103.05051\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2021/06/016\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n pages = \"016\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Limber:1954zz,\n author = \"Limber, D. Nelson\",\n title = \"{The Analysis of Counts of the Extragalactic Nebulae in Terms of a Fluctuating Density Field. II}\",\n doi = \"10.1086/145870\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J.\",\n volume = \"119\",\n pages = \"655\",\n year = \"1954\"\n}\n\n@article{Ho:2008bz,\n author = \"Ho, Shirley and Hirata, Christopher and Padmanabhan, Nikhil and Seljak, Uros and Bahcall, Neta\",\n title = \"{Correlation of CMB with large-scale structure: I. ISW Tomography and Cosmological Implications}\",\n eprint = \"0801.0642\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.78.043519\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"78\",\n pages = \"043519\",\n year = \"2008\"\n}\n\n@article{Kaiser:1991qi,\n author = \"Kaiser, Nick\",\n title = \"{Weak gravitational lensing of distant galaxies}\",\n reportNumber = \"CITA-91-14\",\n doi = \"10.1086/171151\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J.\",\n volume = \"388\",\n pages = \"272\",\n year = \"1992\"\n}\n\n@article{Kaiser:1996tp,\n author = \"Kaiser, Nick\",\n title = \"{Weak lensing and cosmology}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/9610120\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"CITA-96-16\",\n doi = \"10.1086/305515\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J.\",\n volume = \"498\",\n pages = \"26\",\n year = \"1998\"\n}\n\n@article{LoVerde:2008re,\n author = \"LoVerde, Marilena and Afshordi, Niayesh\",\n title = \"{Extended Limber Approximation}\",\n eprint = \"0809.5112\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.78.123506\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"78\",\n pages = \"123506\",\n year = \"2008\"\n}\n\n@article{Andrade:2023pws,\n author = \"Andrade, Uendert and Capistrano, Abra\\~ao J. S. and Di Valentino, Eleonora and Nunes, Rafael C.\",\n title = \"{Exploring Modified Gravity: Constraints on the $\\mu$ and $\\Sigma$ Parametrization with WMAP, ACT, and SPT}\",\n eprint = \"2309.15781\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n month = \"9\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{LISACosmologyWorkingGroup:2022wjo,\n author = \"Baker, Tessa and others\",\n collaboration = \"LISA Cosmology Working Group\",\n title = \"{Measuring the propagation speed of gravitational waves with LISA}\",\n eprint = \"2203.00566\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n reportNumber = \"LISA CosWG-22-02\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/031\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"08\",\n number = \"08\",\n pages = \"031\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Thomas:2020duj,\n author = \"Thomas, Daniel B.\",\n title = \"{Cosmological gravity on all scales: simple equations, required conditions, and a framework for modified gravity}\",\n eprint = \"2004.13051\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.101.123517\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"101\",\n number = \"12\",\n pages = \"123517\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Cusin:2017mzw,\n author = \"Cusin, Giulia and Lewandowski, Matthew and Vernizzi, Filippo\",\n title = \"{Nonlinear Effective Theory of Dark Energy}\",\n eprint = \"1712.02782\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2018/04/061\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"04\",\n pages = \"061\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n@article{Cusin:2017wjg,\n author = \"Cusin, Giulia and Lewandowski, Matthew and Vernizzi, Filippo\",\n title = \"{Dark Energy and Modified Gravity in the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure}\",\n eprint = \"1712.02783\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2018/04/005\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"04\",\n pages = \"005\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n@article{Fiorini:2022srj,\n author = \"Fiorini, Bartolomeo and Koyama, Kazuya and Izard, Albert\",\n title = \"{Studying large-scale structure probes of modified gravity with COLA}\",\n eprint = \"2208.01345\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2022/12/028\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"12\",\n pages = \"028\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Brando:2022gvg,\n author = \"Brando, Guilherme and Fiorini, Bartolomeo and Koyama, Kazuya and Winther, Hans A.\",\n title = \"{Enabling matter power spectrum emulation in beyond-\\ensuremath{\\Lambda}CDM cosmologies with COLA}\",\n eprint = \"2203.11120\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/051\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"09\",\n pages = \"051\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n@article{Dupe:2010zs,\n author = \"Dupe, F. -X. and Rassat, A. and Starck, J. -L. and Fadili, M. J.\",\n title = \"{Measuring the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe Effect}\",\n eprint = \"1010.2192\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/201015893\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"534\",\n pages = \"A51\",\n year = \"2011\"\n}\n@article{Planck:2013owu,\n author = \"Ade, P. A. R. and others\",\n collaboration = \"Planck\",\n title = \"{Planck 2013 results. XIX. The integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect}\",\n eprint = \"1303.5079\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-PH-TH-2013-132\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/201321526\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"571\",\n pages = \"A19\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n@article{Planck:2015fcm,\n author = \"Ade, P. A. R. and others\",\n collaboration = \"Planck\",\n title = \"{Planck 2015 results. XXI. The integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect}\",\n eprint = \"1502.01595\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/201525831\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"594\",\n pages = \"A21\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n@article{Afshordi:2003xu,\n author = \"Afshordi, Niayesh and Loh, Yeong-Shang and Strauss, Michael A.\",\n title = \"{Cross - correlation of the Cosmic Microwave Background with the 2MASS galaxy survey: Signatures of dark energy, hot gas, and point sources}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0308260\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.69.083524\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"69\",\n pages = \"083524\",\n year = \"2004\"\n}\n@article{Boughn:2003yz,\n author = \"Boughn, Stephen and Crittenden, Robert\",\n title = \"{A Correlation of the cosmic microwave sky with large scale structure}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0305001\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"ICG-03-08\",\n doi = \"10.1038/nature02139\",\n journal = \"Nature\",\n volume = \"427\",\n pages = \"45--47\",\n year = \"2004\"\n}\n@article{Fosalba:2003ge,\n author = \"Fosalba, Pablo and Gaztanaga, Enrique and Castander, Francisco\",\n title = \"{Detection of the ISW and SZ effects from the CMB-galaxy correlation}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0307249\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1086/379848\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J. Lett.\",\n volume = \"597\",\n pages = \"L89--92\",\n year = \"2003\"\n}\n@article{Cabre:2007rv,\n author = \"Cabre, Anna and Fosalba, Pablo and Gaztanaga, Enrique and Manera, Marc\",\n title = \"{Error analysis in cross-correlation of sky maps: Application to the ISW detection}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0701393\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12280.x\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"381\",\n pages = \"1347\",\n year = \"2007\"\n}\n@article{Cabre:2006qm,\n author = \"Cabre, A. and Gaztanaga, Enrique and Manera, M. and Fosalba, P. and Castander, F.\",\n title = \"{Cross-correlation of wmap 3rd year and the sdss dr4 galaxy survey: new evidence for dark energy}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0603690\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00218.x\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"372\",\n pages = \"L23--L27\",\n year = \"2006\"\n}\n@article{Giannantonio:2006du,\n author = \"Giannantonio, Tommaso and Crittenden, Robert G. and Nichol, Robert C. and Scranton, Ryan and Richards, Gordon T. and Myers, Adam D. and Brunner, Robert J. and Gray, Alexander G. and Connolly, Andrew J. and Schneider, Donald P.\",\n title = \"{A high redshift detection of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0607572\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"ICG-06-33\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.74.063520\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"74\",\n pages = \"063520\",\n year = \"2006\"\n}\n@article{Raccanelli:2008bc,\n author = \"Raccanelli, A. and Bonaldi, A. and Negrello, M. and Matarrese, S. and Tormen, G. and De Zotti, G.\",\n title = \"{A reassessment of the evidence of the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect through the WMAP-NVSS correlation}\",\n eprint = \"0802.0084\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13189.x\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"386\",\n pages = \"2161--2166\",\n year = \"2008\"\n}\n@article{Rassat:2006kq,\n author = \"Rassat, Anais and Land, Kate and Lahav, Ofer and Abdalla, Filipe B.\",\n title = \"{Cross-correlation of 2MASS and WMAP3: Implications for the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0610911\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11538.x\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"377\",\n pages = \"1085--1094\",\n year = \"2007\"\n}\n@article{Xia:2009dr,\n author = \"Xia, Jun-Qing and Viel, Matteo and Baccigalupi, Carlo and Matarrese, Sabino\",\n title = \"{The High Redshift Integrated Sachs-Wolfe Effect}\",\n eprint = \"0907.4753\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2009/09/003\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"09\",\n pages = \"003\",\n year = \"2009\"\n}\n@article{Hernandez-Monteagudo:2013vwa,\n author = \"Hern\\'andez-Monteagudo, Carlos and others\",\n title = \"{The SDSS-III Baryonic Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: constraints on the integrated Sachs\\textendash{}Wolfe effect}\",\n eprint = \"1303.4302\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stt2312\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"438\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"1724--1740\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n@article{Shajib:2016bes,\n author = \"Shajib, Anowar J. and Wright, Edward L.\",\n title = \"{Measurement of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect using the AllWISE data release}\",\n eprint = \"1604.03939\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.3847/0004-637X/827/2/116\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J.\",\n volume = \"827\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"116\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n@article{Pietrobon:2006gh,\n author = \"Pietrobon, Davide and Balbi, Amedeo and Marinucci, Domenico\",\n title = \"{Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect from the cross-correlation of WMAP 3 year and NVSS: new results and constraints on dark energy}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0606475\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.74.043524\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"74\",\n pages = \"043524\",\n year = \"2006\"\n}\n@article{McEwen:2006my,\n author = \"McEwen, Jason D. and Vielva, P. and Hobson, M. P. and Martinez-Gonzalez, E. and Lasenby, A. N.\",\n title = \"{Detection of the integrated Sachs\\textendash{}Wolfe effect and corresponding dark energy constraints made with directional spherical wavelets}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0602398\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11505.x\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"376\",\n pages = \"1211--1226\",\n year = \"2007\"\n}\n@article{Vielva:2004zg,\n author = \"Vielva, Patricio and Martinez-Gonzalez, E. and Tucci, M.\",\n title = \"{WMAP and NVSS cross-correlation in wavelet space: ISW detection and dark energy constraints}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0408252\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09764.x\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"365\",\n pages = \"891\",\n year = \"2006\"\n}\n@article{Giannantonio:2012aa,\n author = \"Giannantonio, Tommaso and Crittenden, Robert and Nichol, Robert and Ross, Ashley J.\",\n title = \"{The significance of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect revisited}\",\n eprint = \"1209.2125\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21896.x\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"426\",\n pages = \"2581--2599\",\n year = \"2012\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Krolewski:2021znk,\n author = \"Krolewski, Alex and Ferraro, Simone\",\n title = \"{The Integrated Sachs Wolfe effect: unWISE and Planck constraints on dynamical dark energy}\",\n eprint = \"2110.13959\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2022/04/033\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"04\",\n number = \"04\",\n pages = \"033\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n@article{Kovacs:2021mnf,\n author = \"Kov\\'acs, A. and Beck, R. and Smith, A. and R\\'acz, G. and Csabai, I. and Szapudi, I.\",\n title = \"{Evidence for a high-z ISW signal from supervoids in the distribution of eBOSS quasars}\",\n eprint = \"2107.13038\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stac903\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"513\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"15--26\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n@article{Hang:2021kfx,\n author = \"Hang, Qianjun and Alam, Shadab and Cai, Yan-Chuan and Peacock, John A.\",\n title = \"{Stacked CMB lensing and ISW signals around superstructures in the DESI Legacy Survey}\",\n eprint = \"2105.11936\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stab2184\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"507\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"510--523\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n@article{Calore:2020bpd,\n author = \"Calore, Francesca and Cuoco, Alessandro and Regimbau, Tania and Sachdev, Surabhi and Serpico, Pasquale Dario\",\n title = \"{Cross-correlating galaxy catalogs and gravitational waves: a tomographic approach}\",\n eprint = \"2002.02466\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"LAPTH-001/20\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023314\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Res.\",\n volume = \"2\",\n pages = \"023314\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n@article{Xavier:2018owe,\n author = \"Xavier, H. S. and Costa-Duarte, M. V. and Balaguera-Antol\\'\\i{}nez, A. and Bilicki, M.\",\n title = \"{All-sky angular power spectra from cleaned WISE\\texttimes{}SuperCOSMOS galaxy number counts}\",\n eprint = \"1812.08182\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2019/08/037\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"08\",\n pages = \"037\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n@article{DES:2018nlb,\n author = \"Kov\\'acs, A. and others\",\n collaboration = \"DES\",\n title = \"{More out of less: an excess integrated Sachs-Wolfe signal from supervoids mapped out by the Dark Energy Survey}\",\n eprint = \"1811.07812\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-18-711-AE-CD\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stz341\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"484\",\n pages = \"5267--5277\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n@article{Artis:2024eco,\n author = \"Artis, E. and others\",\n title = \"{The SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey - Constraints on f (R) gravity from cluster abundances}\",\n eprint = \"2402.08459\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/202449587\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"691\",\n pages = \"A301\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Linder:2024rdj,\n author = \"Linder, Eric V.\",\n title = \"{Interpreting Dark Energy Data Away from $\\Lambda$}\",\n eprint = \"2410.10981\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n month = \"10\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Sakr:2021ylx,\n author = \"Sakr, Ziad and Martinelli, Matteo\",\n title = \"{Cosmological constraints on sub-horizon scales modified gravity theories with MGCLASS II}\",\n eprint = \"2112.14175\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2022/05/030\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n number = \"05\",\n pages = \"030\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Ishak:2024jhs,\n author = \"Ishak, M. and others\",\n title = \"{Modified Gravity Constraints from the Full Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements from DESI 2024}\",\n eprint = \"2411.12026\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-24-0848-PPD\",\n month = \"11\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Frusciante:2019xia,\n author = \"Frusciante, Noemi and Perenon, Louis\",\n title = \"{Effective field theory of dark energy: A review}\",\n eprint = \"1907.03150\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.physrep.2020.02.004\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rept.\",\n volume = \"857\",\n pages = \"1--63\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Pogosian:2021mcs,\n author = \"Pogosian, Levon and Raveri, Marco and Koyama, Kazuya and Martinelli, Matteo and Silvestri, Alessandra and Zhao, Gong-Bo and Li, Jian and Peirone, Simone and Zucca, Alex\",\n title = \"{Imprints of cosmological tensions in reconstructed gravity}\",\n eprint = \"2107.12992\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1038/s41550-022-01808-7\",\n journal = \"Nature Astron.\",\n volume = \"6\",\n number = \"12\",\n pages = \"1484--1490\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Specogna:2024euz,\n author = \"Specogna, Enrico and Giar\\`e, William and Di Valentino, Eleonora\",\n title = \"{Planck-PR4 anisotropy spectra show better consistency with general relativity}\",\n eprint = \"2411.03896\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.111.103510\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"111\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"103510\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{eBOSS:2020yzd,\n author = \"Alam, Shadab and others\",\n collaboration = \"eBOSS\",\n title = \"{Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory}\",\n eprint = \"2007.08991\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083533\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"103\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"083533\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{BOSS:2016wmc,\n author = \"Alam, Shadab and others\",\n collaboration = \"BOSS\",\n title = \"{The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample}\",\n eprint = \"1607.03155\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stx721\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"470\",\n number = \"3\",\n pages = \"2617--2652\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n@article{eBOSS:2020lta,\n author = \"Bautista, Julian E. and others\",\n collaboration = \"eBOSS\",\n title = \"{The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurement of the BAO and growth rate of structure of the luminous red galaxy sample from the anisotropic correlation function between redshifts 0.6 and 1}\",\n eprint = \"2007.08993\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/staa2800\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"500\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"736--762\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{eBOSS:2020hur,\n author = \"Gil-Marin, Hector and others\",\n collaboration = \"eBOSS\",\n title = \"{The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurement of the BAO and growth rate of structure of the luminous red galaxy sample from the anisotropic power spectrum between redshifts 0.6 and 1.0}\",\n eprint = \"2007.08994\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/staa2455\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"498\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"2492--2531\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{eBOSS:2020gbb,\n author = \"Hou, Jiamin and others\",\n collaboration = \"eBOSS\",\n title = \"{The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: BAO and RSD measurements from anisotropic clustering analysis of the Quasar Sample in configuration space between redshift 0.8 and 2.2}\",\n eprint = \"2007.08998\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/staa3234\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"500\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"1201--1221\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{eBOSS:2020uxp,\n author = \"Neveux, Richard and others\",\n collaboration = \"eBOSS\",\n title = \"{The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: BAO and RSD measurements from the anisotropic power spectrum of the quasar sample between redshift 0.8 and 2.2}\",\n eprint = \"2007.08999\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/staa2780\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"499\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"210--229\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{eBOSS:2020tmo,\n author = \"du Mas des Bourboux, Helion and others\",\n collaboration = \"eBOSS\",\n title = \"{The Completed SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations with Ly\\ensuremath{\\alpha} Forests}\",\n eprint = \"2007.08995\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.3847/1538-4357/abb085\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J.\",\n volume = \"901\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"153\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Howlett:2014opa,\n author = \"Howlett, Cullan and Ross, Ashley and Samushia, Lado and Percival, Will and Manera, Marc\",\n title = \"{The clustering of the SDSS main galaxy sample \\textendash{} II. Mock galaxy catalogues and a measurement of the growth of structure from redshift space distortions at $z = 0.15$}\",\n eprint = \"1409.3238\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stu2693\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"449\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"848--866\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n\n@article{Peirone:2017ywi,\n author = \"Peirone, Simone and Koyama, Kazuya and Pogosian, Levon and Raveri, Marco and Silvestri, Alessandra\",\n title = \"{Large-scale structure phenomenology of viable Horndeski theories}\",\n eprint = \"1712.00444\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.97.043519\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"97\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"043519\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n@article{Espejo:2018hxa,\n author = \"Espejo, Juan and Peirone, Simone and Raveri, Marco and Koyama, Kazuya and Pogosian, Levon and Silvestri, Alessandra\",\n title = \"{Phenomenology of Large Scale Structure in scalar-tensor theories: joint prior covariance of $w_{\\textrm{DE}}$, $\\Sigma$ and $\\mu$ in Horndeski}\",\n eprint = \"1809.01121\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.99.023512\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"99\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"023512\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n@article{Baker:2015bva,\n author = \"Baker, Tessa and Bull, Philip\",\n title = \"{Observational signatures of modified gravity on ultra-large scales}\",\n eprint = \"1506.00641\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/116\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J.\",\n volume = \"811\",\n pages = \"116\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n\n@article{Simpson:2012ra,\n author = \"Simpson, Fergus and others\",\n title = \"{CFHTLenS: Testing the Laws of Gravity with Tomographic Weak Lensing and Redshift Space Distortions}\",\n eprint = \"1212.3339\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/sts493\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"429\",\n pages = \"2249\",\n year = \"2013\"\n}@article{Afshordi:2004kz,\n author = \"Afshordi, Niayesh\",\n title = \"{Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect in cross - correlation: The Observer's manual}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0401166\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083536\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"70\",\n pages = \"083536\",\n year = \"2004\"\n}\n\n@article{Lewis:2019xzd,\n author = \"Lewis, Antony\",\n title = \"{GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo\n samples}\",\n year = \"2019\",\n eprint = \"1910.13970\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.IM\",\n SLACcitation = \"%%CITATION = ARXIV:1910.13970;%%\",\n url = \"https://getdist.readthedocs.io\"\n}\n\n@article{Ratra:1987rm,\n author = \"Ratra, Bharat and Peebles, P. J. E.\",\n title = \"{Cosmological Consequences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field}\",\n reportNumber = \"PUPT-1072\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3406\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"37\",\n pages = \"3406\",\n year = \"1988\"\n}\n\n@article{Wetterich:1987fm,\n author = \"Wetterich, C.\",\n title = \"{Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry}\",\n eprint = \"1711.03844\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"PRINT-87-0756, DESY-87-123\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0550-3213(88)90193-9\",\n journal = \"Nucl. Phys. B\",\n volume = \"302\",\n pages = \"668--696\",\n year = \"1988\"\n}\n\n@article{Frieman:1995pm,\n author = \"Frieman, Joshua A. and Hill, Christopher T. and Stebbins, Albert and Waga, Ioav\",\n title = \"{Cosmology with ultralight pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/9505060\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-95-066-A\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2077\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"75\",\n pages = \"2077--2080\",\n year = \"1995\"\n}\n\n@article{Coble:1996te,\n author = \"Coble, Kimberly and Dodelson, Scott and Frieman, Joshua A.\",\n title = \"{Dynamical Lambda models of structure formation}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/9608122\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-96-222-A\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.55.1851\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"55\",\n pages = \"1851--1859\",\n year = \"1997\"\n}\n\n@article{Caldwell:1997ii,\n author = \"Caldwell, R. R. and Dave, Rahul and Steinhardt, Paul J.\",\n title = \"{Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/9708069\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1582\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"80\",\n pages = \"1582--1585\",\n year = \"1998\"\n}\n\n@article{Charmousis:2011bf,\n author = \"Charmousis, Christos and Copeland, Edmund J. and Padilla, Antonio and Saffin, Paul M.\",\n title = \"{General second order scalar-tensor theory, self tuning, and the Fab Four}\",\n eprint = \"1106.2000\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.051101\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"108\",\n pages = \"051101\",\n year = \"2012\"\n}\n\n@article{Caldwell:2005tm,\n author = \"Caldwell, R. R. and Linder, Eric V.\",\n title = \"{The Limits of quintessence}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0505494\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.141301\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"95\",\n pages = \"141301\",\n year = \"2005\"\n}\n\n@article{Armendariz-Picon:2000nqq,\n author = \"Armendariz-Picon, C. and Mukhanov, Viatcheslav F. and Steinhardt, Paul J.\",\n title = \"{A Dynamical solution to the problem of a small cosmological constant and late time cosmic acceleration}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0004134\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4438\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"85\",\n pages = \"4438--4441\",\n year = \"2000\"\n}\n\n@article{Chevallier:2000qy,\n author = \"Chevallier, Michel and Polarski, David\",\n title = \"{Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter}\",\n eprint = \"gr-qc/0009008\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1142/S0218271801000822\",\n journal = \"Int. J. Mod. Phys. D\",\n volume = \"10\",\n pages = \"213--224\",\n year = \"2001\"\n}\n\n@article{Linder:2002et,\n author = \"Linder, Eric V.\",\n title = \"{Exploring the expansion history of the universe}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0208512\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.091301\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"90\",\n pages = \"091301\",\n year = \"2003\"\n}\n\n@article{DESI:2023dwi,\n author = \"Adame, A. G. and others\",\n collaboration = \"DESI\",\n title = \"{Validation of the Scientific Program for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument}\",\n eprint = \"2306.06307\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-23-317-PPD\",\n doi = \"10.3847/1538-3881/ad0b08\",\n journal = \"Astron. J.\",\n volume = \"167\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"62\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Euclid:2024yrr,\n author = \"Mellier, Y. and others\",\n collaboration = \"Euclid\",\n title = \"{Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission}\",\n eprint = \"2405.13491\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/202450810\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"697\",\n pages = \"A1\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{LSSTDarkEnergyScience:2018jkl,\n author = \"Mandelbaum, Rachel and others\",\n collaboration = \"LSST Dark Energy Science\",\n title = \"{The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC) Science Requirements Document}\",\n eprint = \"1809.01669\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-18-465-A\",\n month = \"9\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n@article{Garcia-Garcia:2019cvr,\n author = \"Garc{\\'\\i}a-Garc{\\'\\i}a, Carlos and Bellini, Emilio and Ferreira, Pedro G. and Traykova, Dina and Zumalac{\\'a}rregui, Miguel\",\n title = \"{Theoretical priors in scalar-tensor cosmologies: Thawing quintessence}\",\n eprint = \"1911.02868\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063508\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"101\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"063508\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Kreisch:2017uet,\n author = \"Kreisch, C. D. and Komatsu, E.\",\n title = \"{Cosmological Constraints on Horndeski Gravity in Light of GW170817}\",\n eprint = \"1712.02710\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2018/12/030\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"12\",\n pages = \"030\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n@article{Tristram:2023haj,\n author = \"Tristram, M. and others\",\n title = \"{Cosmological parameters derived from the final Planck data release (PR4)}\",\n eprint = \"2309.10034\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/202348015\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"682\",\n pages = \"A37\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Euclid:2025tpw,\n author = \"Albuquerque, I. S. and others\",\n collaboration = \"Euclid\",\n title = \"{Euclid preparation. Constraining parameterised models of modifications of gravity with the spectroscopic and photometric primary probes}\",\n eprint = \"2506.03008\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n month = \"6\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Deffayet:2010qz,\n author = \"Deffayet, Cedric and Pujolas, Oriol and Sawicki, Ignacy and Vikman, Alexander\",\n title = \"{Imperfect Dark Energy from Kinetic Gravity Braiding}\",\n eprint = \"1008.0048\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-PH-TH-2010-166\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2010/10/026\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"10\",\n pages = \"026\",\n year = \"2010\"\n}\n\n@article{Ye:2024ywg,\n author = \"Ye, Gen and Martinelli, Matteo and Hu, Bin and Silvestri, Alessandra\",\n title = \"{Hints of Nonminimally Coupled Gravity in DESI 2024 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements}\",\n eprint = \"2407.15832\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.181002\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"134\",\n number = \"18\",\n pages = \"181002\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Wolf:2024stt,\n author = \"Wolf, William J. and Ferreira, Pedro G. and Garc{\\'\\i}a-Garc{\\'\\i}a, Carlos\",\n title = \"{Matching current observational constraints with nonminimally coupled dark energy}\",\n eprint = \"2409.17019\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L041303\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"111\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"L041303\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{DESI:2024mwx,\n author = \"Adame, A. G. and others\",\n collaboration = \"DESI\",\n title = \"{DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"2404.03002\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-24-0154-PPD\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"02\",\n pages = \"021\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{DESI:2025zgx,\n author = \"Abdul Karim, M. and others\",\n collaboration = \"DESI\",\n title = \"{DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints}\",\n eprint = \"2503.14738\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-25-0169-PPD\",\n month = \"3\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{DESI:2025fii,\n author = \"Lodha, K. and others\",\n collaboration = \"DESI\",\n title = \"{Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements}\",\n eprint = \"2503.14743\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-25-0164-PPD\",\n month = \"3\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Pan-STARRS1:2017jku,\n author = \"Scolnic, D. M. and others\",\n collaboration = \"Pan-STARRS1\",\n title = \"{The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Combined Pantheon Sample}\",\n eprint = \"1710.00845\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.3847/1538-4357/aab9bb\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J.\",\n volume = \"859\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"101\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n@article{Foreman-Mackey:2012any,\n author = \"Foreman-Mackey, Daniel and Hogg, David W. and Lang, Dustin and Goodman, Jonathan\",\n title = \"{emcee: The MCMC Hammer}\",\n eprint = \"1202.3665\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.IM\",\n doi = \"10.1086/670067\",\n journal = \"Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.\",\n volume = \"125\",\n pages = \"306--312\",\n year = \"2013\"\n}\n\n@article{Goldstein:2017mmi,\n author = \"Goldstein, A. and others\",\n title = \"{An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A}\",\n eprint = \"1710.05446\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.HE\",\n doi = \"10.3847/2041-8213/aa8f41\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J. Lett.\",\n volume = \"848\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"L14\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n@article{Savchenko:2017ffs,\n author = \"Savchenko, V. and others\",\n title = \"{INTEGRAL Detection of the First Prompt Gamma-Ray Signal Coincident with the Gravitational-wave Event GW170817}\",\n eprint = \"1710.05449\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.HE\",\n doi = \"10.3847/2041-8213/aa8f94\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J. Lett.\",\n volume = \"848\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"L15\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n@article{LIGOScientific:2017zic,\n author = \"Abbott, B. P. and others\",\n collaboration = \"LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi-GBM, INTEGRAL\",\n title = \"{Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A}\",\n eprint = \"1710.05834\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.HE\",\n reportNumber = \"LIGO-P1700308\",\n doi = \"10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J. Lett.\",\n volume = \"848\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"L13\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n@article{LIGOScientific:2017ync,\n author = \"Abbott, B. P. and others\",\n collaboration = \"LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL, IceCube, AstroSat Cadmium Zinc Telluride Imager Team, IPN, Insight-Hxmt, ANTARES, Swift, AGILE Team, 1M2H Team, Dark Energy Camera GW-EM, DES, DLT40, GRAWITA, Fermi-LAT, ATCA, ASKAP, Las Cumbres Observatory Group, OzGrav, DWF (Deeper Wider Faster Program), AST3, CAASTRO, VINROUGE, MASTER, J-GEM, GROWTH, JAGWAR, CaltechNRAO, TTU-NRAO, NuSTAR, Pan-STARRS, MAXI Team, TZAC Consortium, KU, Nordic Optical Telescope, ePESSTO, GROND, Texas Tech University, SALT Group, TOROS, BOOTES, MWA, CALET, IKI-GW Follow-up, H.E.S.S., LOFAR, LWA, HAWC, Pierre Auger, ALMA, Euro VLBI Team, Pi of Sky, Chandra Team at McGill University, DFN, ATLAS Telescopes, High Time Resolution Universe Survey, RIMAS, RATIR, SKA South Africa/MeerKAT\",\n title = \"{Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger}\",\n eprint = \"1710.05833\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.HE\",\n reportNumber = \"LIGO-P1700294, VIR-0802A-17, FERMILAB-PUB-17-478-A-AE-CD\",\n doi = \"10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J. Lett.\",\n volume = \"848\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"L12\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n@article{ACT:2025fju,\n author = \"Louis, Thibaut and others\",\n collaboration = \"ACT\",\n title = \"{The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and $\\Lambda${}CDM Parameters}\",\n eprint = \"2503.14452\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-25-0071-PPD\",\n month = \"3\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{SPT-3G:2025bzu,\n author = \"Camphuis, E. and others\",\n collaboration = \"SPT-3G\",\n title = \"{SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field}\",\n eprint = \"2506.20707\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-25-0144-PPD\",\n month = \"6\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{deBoe:2024gpf,\n author = \"de Boe, Dani and Ye, Gen and Renzi, Fabrizio and Albuquerque, In{\\^e}s S. and Frusciante, Noemi and Silvestri, Alessandra\",\n title = \"{Phenomenology of Horndeski gravity under positivity bounds}\",\n eprint = \"2403.13096\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2024/08/029\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"08\",\n pages = \"029\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{DES:2021wwk,\n author = \"Abbott, T. M. C. and others\",\n collaboration = \"DES\",\n title = \"{Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing}\",\n eprint = \"2105.13549\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-21-221-AE, DES-2020-0617\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.105.023520\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"105\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"023520\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Gleyzes:2017kpi,\n author = \"Gleyzes, J{\\'e}r{\\^o}me\",\n title = \"{Parametrizing modified gravity for cosmological surveys}\",\n eprint = \"1705.04714\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.96.063516\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"96\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"063516\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n@article{Wolf:2024eph,\n author = \"Wolf, William J. and Garc{\\'\\i}a-Garc{\\'\\i}a, Carlos and Bartlett, Deaglan J. and Ferreira, Pedro G.\",\n title = \"{Scant evidence for thawing quintessence}\",\n eprint = \"2408.17318\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083528\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"110\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"083528\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Wolf:2025jlc,\n author = \"Wolf, William J. and Garc{\\'\\i}a-Garc{\\'\\i}a, Carlos and Ferreira, Pedro G.\",\n title = \"{Robustness of dark energy phenomenology across different parameterizations}\",\n eprint = \"2502.04929\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2025/05/034\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"034\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Wolf:2025jed,\n author = \"Wolf, William J. and Garc{\\'\\i}a-Garc{\\'\\i}a, Carlos and Anton, Theodore and Ferreira, Pedro G.\",\n title = \"{Assessing cosmological evidence for non-minimal coupling}\",\n eprint = \"2504.07679\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n month = \"4\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Pan:2025psn,\n author = \"Pan, Jiaming and Ye, Gen\",\n title = \"{Non-minimally coupled gravity constraints from DESI DR2 data}\",\n eprint = \"2503.19898\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n month = \"3\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{ACT:2023kun,\n author = \"Madhavacheril, Mathew S. and others\",\n collaboration = \"ACT\",\n title = \"{The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters}\",\n eprint = \"2304.05203\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-23-206-PPD\",\n doi = \"10.3847/1538-4357/acff5f\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J.\",\n volume = \"962\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"113\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{ACT:2025tim,\n author = \"Calabrese, Erminia and others\",\n collaboration = \"ACT\",\n title = \"{The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models}\",\n eprint = \"2503.14454\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-25-0157-PPD\",\n month = \"3\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Babichev:2007dw,\n author = \"Babichev, Eugeny and Mukhanov, Viatcheslav and Vikman, Alexander\",\n title = \"{k-Essence, superluminal propagation, causality and emergent geometry}\",\n eprint = \"0708.0561\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"LMU-ASC-54-07\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/101\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"02\",\n pages = \"101\",\n year = \"2008\"\n}\n\n@article{Burrage:2011cr,\n author = \"Burrage, Clare and de Rham, Claudia and Heisenberg, Lavinia and Tolley, Andrew J.\",\n title = \"{Chronology Protection in Galileon Models and Massive Gravity}\",\n eprint = \"1111.5549\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/004\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"07\",\n pages = \"004\",\n year = \"2012\"\n}\n\n@article{Park:2024pew,\n author = \"Park, Chan-Gyung and de Cruz P{\\'e}rez, Javier and Ratra, Bharat\",\n title = \"{Is the w0waCDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck CMB anisotropy data?}\",\n eprint = \"2410.13627\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1142/S0218271825500580\",\n journal = \"Int. J. Mod. Phys. D\",\n volume = \"34\",\n number = \"13\",\n pages = \"2550058\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Shah:2025vnt,\n author = \"Shah, Neel and Koyama, Kazuya and Noller, Johannes\",\n title = \"{Dark energy constraints in light of theoretical priors}\",\n eprint = \"2507.19450\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2026/01/054\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"01\",\n pages = \"054\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{rosenberg22,\n author = {{Rosenberg}, Erik and {Gratton}, Steven and {Efstathiou}, George},\n title = \"{CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {cosmological parameters, cosmic background radiation, methods: data analysis, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2022,\n month = dec,\n volume = {517},\n number = {3},\n pages = {4620-4636},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac2744},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2205.10869},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@article{Carron:2022eyg,\n author = \"Carron, Julien and Mirmelstein, Mark and Lewis, Antony\",\n title = \"{CMB lensing from Planck PR4~maps}\",\n eprint = \"2206.07773\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/039\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"09\",\n pages = \"039\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{DESI:2024jxi,\n author = \"Adame, A. G. and others\",\n collaboration = \"DESI\",\n title = \"{DESI 2024 V: Full-Shape galaxy clustering from galaxies and quasars}\",\n eprint = \"2411.12021\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-24-0847-PPD\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/008\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"09\",\n pages = \"008\",\n year = \"2025\",\n note = \"[Erratum: JCAP 02, E02 (2026)]\"\n}\n\n@article{Carron:2022eum,\n author = \"Carron, Julien and Lewis, Antony and Fabbian, Giulio\",\n title = \"{Planck integrated Sachs-Wolfe-lensing likelihood and the CMB temperature}\",\n eprint = \"2209.07395\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103507\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"106\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"103507\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{DES:2018gui,\n author = \"Abbott, T. M. C. and others\",\n collaboration = \"DES, NOAO Data Lab\",\n title = \"{The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 1}\",\n eprint = \"1801.03181\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.IM\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-17-603-AE-E\",\n doi = \"10.3847/1538-4365/aae9f0\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J. Suppl.\",\n volume = \"239\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"18\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n@article{DES:2021rex,\n author = \"Krause, E. and others\",\n collaboration = \"DES\",\n title = \"{Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Multi-Probe Modeling Strategy and Validation}\",\n eprint = \"2105.13548\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-21-240-AE\",\n month = \"5\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{DES:2025sig,\n author = \"Popovic, B. and others\",\n collaboration = \"DES\",\n title = \"{The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: A Reanalysis Of Cosmology Results And Evidence For Evolving Dark Energy With An Updated Type Ia Supernova Calibration}\",\n eprint = \"2511.07517\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-25-0842-CSAID-PPD\",\n month = \"11\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{DES:2024jxu,\n author = \"Abbott, T. M. C. and others\",\n collaboration = \"DES\",\n title = \"{The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results with {\\ensuremath{\\sim}}1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set}\",\n eprint = \"2401.02929\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-23-0821-PPD, DES-2023-805\",\n doi = \"10.3847/2041-8213/ad6f9f\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J. Lett.\",\n volume = \"973\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"L14\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Wang:2024uvw,\n author = \"Wang, Zhuangfei and Saadeh, Daniela and Koyama, Kazuya and Pogosian, Levon and Bose, Benjamin and Yi, Lanyang and Zhao, Gong-Bo\",\n title = \"{Extending MGCAMB tests of gravity to nonlinear scales}\",\n eprint = \"2406.09204\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2024/11/003\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"11\",\n pages = \"003\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Hoyt:2026fve,\n author = \"Hoyt, Taylor J. and Rubin, David and Aldering, Greg and Perlmutter, Saul and Cuceu, Andrei and Gupta, Ravi\",\n title = \"{Union3.1: Self-consistent Measurements of Host Galaxy Properties for 2000 Type Ia Supernovae}\",\n eprint = \"2601.19424\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n month = \"1\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Lemos:2023xhs,\n author = \"Lemos, Pablo and Lewis, Antony\",\n title = \"{CMB constraints on the early Universe independent of late-time cosmology}\",\n eprint = \"2302.12911\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.107.103505\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"107\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"103505\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{Brieden:2021edu,\n author = \"Brieden, Samuel and Gil-Mar{\\'\\i}n, H{\\'e}ctor and Verde, Licia\",\n title = \"{ShapeFit: extracting the power spectrum shape information in galaxy surveys beyond BAO and RSD}\",\n eprint = \"2106.07641\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2021/12/054\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"12\",\n number = \"12\",\n pages = \"054\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Lai:2024bpl,\n author = \"Lai, Y. and others\",\n title = \"{A comparison between ShapeFit compression and Full-Modelling method with PyBird for DESI 2024 and beyond}\",\n eprint = \"2404.07283\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/139\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"01\",\n pages = \"139\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Torrado:2020dgo,\n author = \"Torrado, Jesus and Lewis, Antony\",\n title = \"{Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models}\",\n eprint = \"2005.05290\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.IM\",\n reportNumber = \"TTK-20-15\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/057\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"057\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@software{2019ascl.soft10019T,\n author = {{Torrado}, Jes{\\'u}s and {Lewis}, Antony},\n title = \"{Cobaya: Bayesian analysis in cosmology}\",\n howpublished = {Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1910.019},\n year = 2019,\n month = oct,\n eid = {ascl:1910.019},\narchivePrefix = {ascl},\n eprint = {1910.019},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ascl.soft10019T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@article{Castorina:2013wga,\n author = \"Castorina, Emanuele and Sefusatti, Emiliano and Sheth, Ravi K. and Villaescusa-Navarro, Francisco and Viel, Matteo\",\n title = \"{Cosmology with massive neutrinos II: on the universality of the halo mass function and bias}\",\n eprint = \"1311.1212\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2014/02/049\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"02\",\n pages = \"049\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n\n@article{Stolzner:2025vet,\n author = {St{\\\"o}lzner, Benjamin and others},\n title = \"{KiDS-Legacy: Constraints on Horndeski gravity from weak lensing combined with galaxy clustering and cosmic microwave background anisotropies}\",\n eprint = \"2512.11039\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/202558536\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"707\",\n pages = \"A323\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Lu:2025sjg,\n author = \"Lu, Zhiyu and Simon, Th{\\'e}o\",\n title = \"{New multiprobe analysis of modified gravity and evolving dark energy}\",\n eprint = \"2511.10616\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/hfxk-bdr3\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"113\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"063555\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Albrecht:2006um,\n author = \"Albrecht, Andreas and others\",\n title = \"{Report of the Dark Energy Task Force}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0609591\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-FN-0793-A\",\n month = \"9\",\n year = \"2006\"\n}\n\n@article{Tsujikawa:2015mga,\n author = \"Tsujikawa, Shinji\",\n title = \"{Possibility of realizing weak gravity in redshift space distortion measurements}\",\n eprint = \"1505.02459\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.92.044029\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"92\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"044029\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n\n@article{Perenon:2015sla,\n author = \"Perenon, Louis and Piazza, Federico and Marinoni, Christian and Hui, Lam\",\n title = \"{Phenomenology of dark energy: general features of large-scale perturbations}\",\n eprint = \"1506.03047\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2015/11/029\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"11\",\n pages = \"029\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n\n@article{Hu:2016zrh,\n author = \"Hu, Bin and Raveri, Marco and Rizzato, Matteo and Silvestri, Alessandra\",\n title = \"{Testing Hu{\\textendash}Sawicki f(R) gravity with the effective field theory approach}\",\n eprint = \"1601.07536\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stw775\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"459\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"3880--3889\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n@article{Tutusaus:2023aux,\n author = \"Tutusaus, Isaac and Bonvin, Camille and Grimm, Nastassia\",\n title = \"{Measurement of the Weyl potential evolution from the first three years of dark energy survey data}\",\n eprint = \"2312.06434\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1038/s41467-024-53363-6\",\n journal = \"Nature Commun.\",\n volume = \"15\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"9295\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Rosatello:2026znt,\n author = \"Rosatello, Benedetta and Ye, Gen and Berti, Maria and Tutusaus, Isaac and Grimm, Nastassia and Bonvin, Camille\",\n title = \"{The impact of evolving dark energy on the Weyl potential measured from the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data}\",\n eprint = \"2605.22599\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n month = \"5\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Wilks:1938dza,\n author = \"Wilks, S. S.\",\n title = \"{The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses}\",\n doi = \"10.1214/aoms/1177732360\",\n journal = \"Annals Math. Statist.\",\n volume = \"9\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"60--62\",\n year = \"1938\"\n}\n\n@article{Rubin:2023jdq,\n author = \"Rubin, David and others\",\n title = \"{Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework}\",\n eprint = \"2311.12098\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.3847/1538-4357/adc0a5\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J.\",\n volume = \"986\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"231\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{DESI:2024kob,\n author = \"Lodha, K. and others\",\n collaboration = \"DESI\",\n title = \"{DESI 2024: Constraints on physics-focused aspects of dark energy using DESI DR1 BAO data}\",\n eprint = \"2405.13588\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-24-0756-PPD\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.111.023532\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"111\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"023532\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{DES:2025upx,\n author = \"Abbott, T. M. C. and others\",\n collaboration = \"DES\",\n title = \"{Dark Energy Survey: Implications for cosmological expansion models from the final DES baryon acoustic oscillation and supernova data}\",\n eprint = \"2503.06712\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-25-0127-PPD, DES-2024-0849\",\n doi = \"10.1103/z2q4-qcdq\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"113\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"063530\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{SPT-3G:2024atg,\n author = \"Ge, F. and others\",\n collaboration = \"SPT-3G\",\n title = \"{Cosmology from CMB lensing and delensed EE power spectra using 2019{\\textendash}2020 SPT-3G polarization data}\",\n eprint = \"2411.06000\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-24-0840-PPD\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083534\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"111\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"083534\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Brout:2022vxf,\n author = \"Brout, Dillon and others\",\n title = \"{The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints}\",\n eprint = \"2202.04077\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.3847/1538-4357/ac8e04\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J.\",\n volume = \"938\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"110\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{DES:2026fyc,\n author = \"Abbott, T. M. C. and others\",\n collaboration = \"DES\",\n title = \"{Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing}\",\n eprint = \"2601.14559\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"DES-2025-0929, FERMILAB-PUB-26-0026-PPD\",\n month = \"1\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Wright:2025xka,\n author = \"Wright, Angus H. and others\",\n title = \"{KiDS-Legacy: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear with the complete Kilo-Degree Survey}\",\n eprint = \"2503.19441\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/202554908\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"703\",\n pages = \"A158\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Qin:2025ggt,\n author = \"Qin, F. and others\",\n title = \"{The DESI DR1 peculiar velocity survey: Growth rate measurements from the galaxy power spectrum}\",\n eprint = \"2512.03230\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-25-0898-PPD\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361/202558368\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"708\",\n pages = \"A219\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Lai:2025xkf,\n author = \"Lai, Y. and others\",\n title = \"{The DESI DR1 peculiar velocity survey: growth rate measurements from the maximum likelihood fields method}\",\n eprint = \"2512.03229\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-25-0900-PPD\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2026/04/026\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"04\",\n pages = \"026\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Qin:2025rwz,\n author = \"Qin, F. and others\",\n title = \"{The DESI DR1 Peculiar Velocity Survey: Growth Rate Measurements from the Galaxy Power Spectrum}\",\n eprint = \"2512.03231\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-25-0901-PPD\",\n doi = \"10.5281/zenodo.17672674\",\n month = \"12\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Chudaykin:2025gdn,\n author = \"Chudaykin, Anton and Kunz, Martin and Carron, Julien\",\n title = \"{Modified gravity constraints with the Planck ISW-lensing bispectrum}\",\n eprint = \"2503.09893\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/9zjh-8htv\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"112\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"083537\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Li:2026sbr,\n author = \"Li, Shang and Zhang, Pengjie and Dong, Fuyu\",\n title = \"{Synergy between the gravitational potential decay rate and other structure growth probes in testing gravity}\",\n eprint = \"2606.10597\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n month = \"6\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Kennedy:2018gtx,\n author = \"Kennedy, Joe and Lombriser, Lucas and Taylor, Andy\",\n title = \"{Reconstructing Horndeski theories from phenomenological modified gravity and dark energy models on cosmological scales}\",\n eprint = \"1804.04582\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.98.044051\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"98\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"044051\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n@article{Pace:2020qpj,\n author = \"Pace, Francesco and Battye, Richard and Bellini, Emilio and Lombriser, Lucas and Vernizzi, Filippo and Bolliet, Boris\",\n title = \"{Comparison of different approaches to the quasi-static approximation in Horndeski models}\",\n eprint = \"2011.05713\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2021/06/017\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n pages = \"017\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Amendola:2007rr,\n author = \"Amendola, Luca and Kunz, Martin and Sapone, Domenico\",\n title = \"{Measuring the dark side (with weak lensing)}\",\n eprint = \"0704.2421\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2008/04/013\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"04\",\n pages = \"013\",\n year = \"2008\"\n}\n\n@article{Hu:2007pj,\n author = \"Hu, Wayne and Sawicki, Ignacy\",\n title = \"{A Parameterized Post-Friedmann Framework for Modified Gravity}\",\n eprint = \"0708.1190\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.76.104043\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"76\",\n pages = \"104043\",\n year = \"2007\"\n}\n\n@article{Jain:2007yk,\n author = \"Jain, Bhuvnesh and Zhang, Pengjie\",\n title = \"{Observational Tests of Modified Gravity}\",\n eprint = \"0709.2375\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.78.063503\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"78\",\n pages = \"063503\",\n year = \"2008\"\n}\n\n@article{Zhao:2010dz,\n author = \"Zhao, Gong-Bo and Giannantonio, Tommaso and Pogosian, Levon and Silvestri, Alessandra and Bacon, David J. and Koyama, Kazuya and Nichol, Robert C. and Song, Yong-Seon\",\n title = \"{Probing modifications of General Relativity using current cosmological observations}\",\n eprint = \"1003.0001\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.81.103510\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"81\",\n pages = \"103510\",\n year = \"2010\"\n}\n\n@article{Kimura:2011dc,\n author = \"Kimura, Rampei and Kobayashi, Tsutomu and Yamamoto, Kazuhiro\",\n title = \"{Vainshtein screening in a cosmological background in the most general second-order scalar-tensor theory}\",\n eprint = \"1111.6749\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.85.024023\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"85\",\n pages = \"024023\",\n year = \"2012\"\n}\n\n@article{Takushima:2015iha,\n author = \"Takushima, Yuichiro and Terukina, Ayumu and Yamamoto, Kazuhiro\",\n title = \"{Third order solutions of cosmological density perturbations in Horndeski{\\textquoteright}s most general scalar-tensor theory with the Vainshtein mechanism}\",\n eprint = \"1502.03935\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.92.104033\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"92\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"104033\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n\n@article{Brando:2023fzu,\n author = \"Brando, Guilherme and Koyama, Kazuya and Winther, Hans A.\",\n title = \"{Revisiting Vainshtein screening for fast N-body simulations}\",\n eprint = \"2303.09549\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2023/06/045\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n pages = \"045\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{Amendola:2025xka,\n author = \"Amendola, Luca and Bernal, Carla and Gannouji, Radouane\",\n title = \"{Nonlinear dynamics in Horndeski gravity: A renormalized approach to effective gravitational coupling}\",\n eprint = \"2505.03999\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n doi = \"10.1103/64xp-trdr\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"112\",\n number = \"6\",\n pages = \"063533\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Sirera:2026klo,\n author = \"Sirera, Sergi and Baker, Tessa and Hallam, James and Naidoo, Krishna\",\n title = \"{A Master Equation for Screening in Luminal Horndeski Gravity}\",\n eprint = \"2605.04154\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n month = \"5\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Zuntz:2014csq,\n author = \"Zuntz, Joe and Paterno, Marc and Jennings, Elise and Rudd, Douglas and Manzotti, Alessandro and Dodelson, Scott and Bridle, Sarah and Sehrish, Saba and Kowalkowski, James\",\n title = \"{CosmoSIS: modular cosmological parameter estimation}\",\n eprint = \"1409.3409\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-14-408-A\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.ascom.2015.05.005\",\n journal = \"Astron. Comput.\",\n volume = \"12\",\n pages = \"45--59\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n\n@article{Beutler:2012px,\n author = \"Beutler, Florian and Blake, Chris and Colless, Matthew and Jones, D. Heath and Staveley-Smith, Lister and Poole, Gregory B. and Campbell, Lachlan and Parker, Quentin and Saunders, Will and Watson, Fred\",\n title = \"{The 6dF Galaxy Survey: $z \\approx 0$ measurement of the growth rate and $\\sigma_8$}\",\n eprint = \"1204.4725\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21136.x\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"423\",\n pages = \"3430--3444\",\n year = \"2012\"\n}\n\n@article{BOSS:2013yzh,\n author = \"Samushia, Lado and others\",\n collaboration = \"BOSS\",\n title = \"{The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measuring growth rate and geometry with anisotropic clustering}\",\n eprint = \"1312.4899\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stu197\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"439\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"3504--3519\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n\n@article{Turner:2022mla,\n author = \"Turner, Ryan J. and Blake, Chris and Ruggeri, Rossana\",\n title = \"{A local measurement of the growth rate from peculiar velocities and galaxy clustering correlations in the 6dF Galaxy Survey}\",\n eprint = \"2207.03707\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stac3256\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"518\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"2436--2452\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{CosmoVerseNetwork:2025alb,\n author = \"Di Valentino, Eleonora and others\",\n collaboration = \"CosmoVerse Network\",\n title = \"{The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics}\",\n eprint = \"2504.01669\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965\",\n journal = \"Phys. Dark Univ.\",\n volume = \"49\",\n pages = \"101965\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Fang:2008sn,\n author = \"Fang, Wenjuan and Hu, Wayne and Lewis, Antony\",\n title = \"{Crossing the Phantom Divide with Parameterized Post-Friedmann Dark Energy}\",\n eprint = \"0808.3125\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.78.087303\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"78\",\n pages = \"087303\",\n year = \"2008\"\n}\n\n@article{DAmico:2022osl,\n author = \"D'Amico, Guido and Donath, Yaniv and Lewandowski, Matthew and Senatore, Leonardo and Zhang, Pierre\",\n title = \"{The BOSS bispectrum analysis at one loop from the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure}\",\n eprint = \"2206.08327\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"NUHEP-TH/22-05\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/059\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"059\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Zhou:2023gji,\n author = \"Zhou, Rongpu and others\",\n title = \"{DESI luminous red galaxy samples for cross-correlations}\",\n eprint = \"2309.06443\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2023/11/097\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"11\",\n pages = \"097\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{Lu:2025gki,\n author = \"Lu, Zhiyu and Simon, Th{\\'e}o and Zhang, Pierre\",\n title = \"{Preference for evolving dark energy in light of the galaxy bispectrum}\",\n eprint = \"2503.04602\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n month = \"3\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Dong:2024vxo,\n author = \"Dong, Fuyu and Zhang, Pengjie and Xu, Haojie and Qin, Jian\",\n title = \"{The Direct Measurement of Gravitational Potential Decay Rate at Cosmological Scales. II. Improved Dark Energy Constraint from z {\\ensuremath{\\leq}} 1.4}\",\n eprint = \"2411.12594\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.3847/1538-4357/adb585\",\n journal = \"Astrophys. J.\",\n volume = \"982\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"99\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Reeves:2025xau,\n author = \"Reeves, Alexander and Ferraro, Simone and Nicola, Andrina and Refregier, Alexandre\",\n title = \"{Multiprobe constraints on early and late time dark energy}\",\n eprint = \"2510.06114\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/w737-nk6r\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"113\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"103512\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{AtacamaCosmologyTelescope:2025blo,\n author = \"Louis, Thibaut and others\",\n collaboration = \"Atacama Cosmology Telescope\",\n title = \"{The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and {\\ensuremath{\\Lambda}}CDM parameters}\",\n eprint = \"2503.14452\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-25-0071-PPD\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/062\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"11\",\n pages = \"062\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Ganjoo:2026ugf,\n author = \"Ganjoo, Himanish and others\",\n title = \"{PySCo-EFT and ECOSMOG-EFT: a tandem of N-body simulation codes for the Effective Field Theory of Dark Energy}\",\n eprint = \"2604.15434\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n month = \"4\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Chudaykin:2024gol,\n author = \"Chudaykin, Anton and Kunz, Martin\",\n title = \"{Modified gravity interpretation of the evolving dark energy in light of DESI data}\",\n eprint = \"2407.02558\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123524\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"110\",\n number = \"12\",\n pages = \"123524\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Perenon:2016blf,\n author = \"Perenon, Louis and Marinoni, Christian and Piazza, Federico\",\n title = \"{Diagnostic of Horndeski Theories}\",\n eprint = \"1609.09197\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/035\",\n journal = \"JCAP\",\n volume = \"01\",\n pages = \"035\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n@article{Rosenberg:2022sdy,\n author = \"Rosenberg, Erik and Gratton, Steven and Efstathiou, George\",\n title = \"{CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec}\",\n eprint = \"2205.10869\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.CO\",\n doi = \"10.1093/mnras/stac2744\",\n journal = \"Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.\",\n volume = \"517\",\n number = \"3\",\n pages = \"4620--4636\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n================================================\nFILE: DESI_RSD_EFT.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[twocolumn, superscriptaddress,amsfont,amssymb,amsmath, showpacs,balancelastpage, nofootinbib]{revtex4-2}\n\\usepackage{graphicx,longtable,mathrsfs,color,array}\n\\usepackage[unicode=true,pdfusetitle,\nbookmarks=true,bookmarksnumbered=true,bookmarksopen=true,bookmarksopenlevel=1,\nbreaklinks=false,pdfborder={0 0 0},backref=false,colorlinks=true]{hyperref}\n\\hypersetup{citecolor=blue,filecolor=blue,linkcolor=blue,urlcolor=blue}\n\\synctex=-1\n\\usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames,table]{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{amssymb,amsmath,mathtools,mathrsfs,enumitem}\n\\usepackage{epsfig,subfigure,placeins,float}\n\\usepackage{booktabs,multirow}\n\\usepackage{exscale,relsize}\n\\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}\n\\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}\n\\usepackage{enumerate}\n\\usepackage{times, mathptmx}\n\\usepackage{tikz}\n\\usepackage{aas_macros}\n\\usepackage{bm}\n\\usetikzlibrary{arrows,positioning,decorations.markings,decorations.pathmorphing,calc}\n\n\n\\usepackage[capitalise]{cleveref}\n\\usepackage{diagbox}\n\\usepackage{hhline}\n%\\usepackage{caption}\n%\\usepackage{subcaption}\n\n\n\n\\newcommand{\\be}{\\begin{equation}}\n\\newcommand{\\ee}{\\end{equation}}\n\\newcommand{\\pa}{\\partial}\n\\newcommand{\\cgw}{c_{\\rm GW}}\n\\newcommand{\\MPl}{M_{\\rm Pl}}\n\\newcommand{\\Oo}{{{\\cal O}(1)}}\n\\newcommand{\\aH}{\\alpha_H}\n\\newcommand{\\aB}{\\alpha_B}\n\\newcommand{\\aM}{\\alpha_M}\n\\newcommand{\\aT}{\\alpha_T}\n\\newcommand{\\aK}{\\alpha_K}\n\\newcommand{\\aI}{\\alpha_i}\n\\newcommand{\\aQS}{\\alpha_{\\rm QS}}\n\\newcommand{\\km}{{\\rm km}}\n\\newcommand{\\comment}[1]{}\n\\newcommand{\\uKam}{\\mu\\text{K-arcmin}}\n\\newcommand{\\mSz}{\\mu_0, \\Sigma_0}\n\\newcommand{\\mSt}{\\{\\mu_{\\rm{today}},\\Sigma_{\\rm{today}}\\}}\n\\newcommand{\\mS}{\\{\\mu, \\Sigma\\}}\n\\newcommand{\\mt}{\\mu_{\\rm{today}}}\n\\newcommand{\\St}{\\Sigma_{\\rm{today}}}\n\\newcommand{\\BMz}{\\{\\alpha_{B,0},\\alpha_{M,0}\\}}\n\\newcommand{\\wzwa}{\\{w_0, w_a\\}}\n\\newcommand{\\cBM}{\\{c_B, c_M\\}}\n\\newcommand{\\ITk}{\\text{ISW-}T\\kappa}\n\\newcommand{\\ITg}{\\text{ISW-}Tg}\n\\newcommand{\\txtp}{3\\times 2\\text{pt}}\n\\newcommand{\\lcdm}{\\Lambda\\text{CDM}}\n\\newcolumntype{C}[1]{>{\\centering\\let\\newline\\\\\\arraybackslash\\hspace{0pt}}m{#1}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\blue}[1]{\\textcolor{blue}{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\red}[1]{\\textcolor{red}{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\orange}[1]{\\textcolor{orange}{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\todo}[1]{\\textcolor{red}{[\\textbf{TODO}: #1]}}\n\\newcommand{\\jn}[1]{\\textcolor{red}{[\\textbf{JN}: #1]}}\n\\newcommand{\\ns}[1]{\\textcolor{orange}{[\\textbf{NS}: #1]}}\n\\newcommand{\\kazuya}[1]{\\textcolor{teal}{[\\textbf{KK}: #1]}}\n\\newcommand{\\yly}[1]{\\textcolor{blue}{[\\textbf{LY}: #1]}}\n\\newcommand{\\todorc}[1]{\\textcolor{orange}{[\\textbf{TODO}: Addressing referee comment. #1]}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\togglered}[1]{\\textcolor{red}{#1}}\n%\\newcommand{\\togglered}[1]{#1}\n\n\\definecolor{hyperref}{RGB}{026,028,087}\n% -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --\n\\newcommand*{\\ArcAngle}{270}%\n\\newcommand*{\\ArcRadius}{1.2}%\n\\newcommand*{\\LineExtend}{1.25}%\n\\newcommand*{\\LableExtend}{1.10}%\n\\DeclareMathOperator{\\Tr}{Tr}\n\\def\\gsim{ \\lower .75ex \\hbox{$\\sim$} \\llap{\\raise .27ex \\hbox{$>$}} }\n\\def\\lsim{ \\lower .75ex \\hbox{$\\sim$} \\llap{\\raise .27ex \\hbox{$<$}} }\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\newcommand{\\HRule}{\\rule{\\linewidth}{0.4mm}}\n\\newcommand{\\thickhline}{\\noalign{\\hrule height 2.0pt}}\n\\newcommand{\\dof}{{\\it dof} }\n\\newcommand{\\eft}{{\\it EFT} }\n\\newcommand{\\eoms}{{\\it eom}s }\n\\newcommand{\\eom}{{\\it eom} }\n\\def\\nn{\\nonumber}\n\\def\\ni{\\noindent}\n\n\\def\\la{\\langle}\n\\def\\ra{\\rangle}\n\n\\graphicspath{{./figures/}}\n\\allowdisplaybreaks\n\n\\tikzstyle{vecArrow} = [thick, decoration={markings,mark=at position\n1 with {\\arrow[semithick]{open triangle 60}}},\ndouble distance=1.4pt, shorten >= 5.5pt,\npreaction = {decorate},\npostaction = {draw,line width=1.4pt, white,shorten >= 4.5pt}]\n\n\\newcommand{\\leftparbox}[2]{\\parbox{#1}{\\begin{flushleft} #2 \\end{flushleft}}}\n\\newcommand{\\twoonesig}[4][\\pbwidth]{\n\\begin{equation}\n\\left.\n \\begin{aligned}\n#2 \\\\ #3\n \\end{aligned}\n%\\ \\right\\} \\ \\ \\mbox{\\text{\\leftparbox{#1}{68\\,\\%,~#4}}}\n\\ \\right\\} \\ \\ \\mbox{\\text{\\leftparbox{#1}{#4}}}\n\\end{equation}\n}\n\n\n\n\\begin{document}\n\\title{Constraining dark energy with complementary probes of large-scale structure}\n\n\\author{Neel Shah}\n\\affiliation{Institute of Cosmology \\& Gravitation, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3FX, U.K.}\n\\affiliation{Department of Physics \\& Astronomy, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, U.K}\n\n\\author{Kazuya Koyama}\n\\affiliation{Institute of Cosmology \\& Gravitation, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3FX, U.K.}\n\\affiliation{Kavli IPMU (WPI), UTIAS, The University of Tokyo, \\\\ Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan}\n\\affiliation{Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, \\\\ Kyoto 606-8502, Japan}\n\n\\author{Johannes Noller}\n\\affiliation{Department of Physics \\& Astronomy, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, U.K}\n\\affiliation{Institute of Cosmology \\& Gravitation, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3FX, U.K.}\n\n\\author{Lanyang Yi}\n\\affiliation{National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China}\n\\affiliation{School of Astronomy and Space Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China}\n\\affiliation{Institute of Cosmology \\& Gravitation, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3FX, U.K.}\n\n\\begin{abstract}\nTo observationally pin down the nature of dark energy, it is essential to consistently model cosmological perturbations in the presence of dark energy alongside the background expansion and constrain this joint theory space with a large array of complementary probes. Here, we achieve this by constraining a model in the Effective Field Theory of Dark Energy (EFTofDE) framework by supplementing probes of the expansion history with several probes of large-scale structure: redshift space distortions (RSD) from DESI DR1, $3\\times2$pt measurements from DES Y3, and the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect from cross-correlating CMB temperature anisotropies with galaxy number counts or CMB lensing. We demonstrate the complementarity of different probes which leads to strong improvements on constraints on DE perturbations. For our most constraining dataset combination that supplements CMB+BAO+SNe probes with DESI DR1 RSD, DES Y3 $3\\times2$pt and ISW cross-correlations between CMB temperature and galaxy counts, we find an improvement in the Figure of Merit (FoM) for the DE perturbation parameters $\\{c_B, c_M\\}$ by a factor of 2.69. We show the phenomenological implications of these constraints by mapping them to the present-day values of the phenomenological functions $\\{\\mu(z), \\Sigma(z)\\}$, where we see an FoM improvement by a factor of 3.37. We find a significant interdependence between the posteriors of $\\{w_0, w_a\\}$ and $\\{c_B, c_M\\}$, caused by the theoretical prior imposed by the gradient stability condition within the EFTofDE framework. Finally, we compute the significance of deviation from $\\Lambda$CM for the EFTofDE model when constrained with CMB+BAO+SNe datasets, finding it to be at 2.9$\\sigma$. This significance is nontrivially similar to the significance for the $w_0w_a$CDM model for the same dataset combination which we find to be 3.1$\\sigma$.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\\date{\\today}\n\\maketitle\n\n\\tableofcontents\n\n\\section{Introduction} \\label{sec:intro}\n\nIdentifying the nature of dark energy (DE) has been one of the core pursuits in cosmology ever since the discovery of the accelerated expansion of the universe \\cite{Riess:1998cb,Perlmutter:1998np}, and this pursuit has been renewed due to recent observational hints for dynamical DE \\cite{Rubin:2023jdq,DES:2024jxu,DESI:2024mwx,DESI:2024kob,DES:2025upx,DESI:2025zgx,DESI:2025fii,DES:2025sig,Hoyt:2026fve}.\n%\nThe main phenomenological avenue for looking for dynamical DE signatures has been the background cosmic expansion history. The most well-established probes of the cosmic background expansion are the cosmic microwave background (CMB), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), and Type IA supernovae (SNe), with current state-of-the-art constraints coming from e.g. \\cite{Planck:2018vyg,ACT:2025fju,SPT-3G:2025bzu,DES:2024jxu,DESI:2024mwx,DESI:2025zgx,Brout:2022vxf,Rubin:2023jdq,DES:2025upx,DES:2025sig,Hoyt:2026fve}. Constraints on dynamical DE signatures on the evolution of cosmic large-scale structure (LSS) are less explored and have scope to be improved by employing already existing LSS observations. Dynamical DE signatures on the evolution of cosmological perturbations contain further information about the microphysics of DE and are closely related to signatures of modified gravity. There is a wide variety of probes that constrain cosmological perturbations: CMB lensing, redshift space distortions (RSD), weak gravitational lensing, the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect, peculiar velocities, and more (see e.g. \\cite{Planck:2018lbu,ACT:2023kun,SPT-3G:2024atg,DESI:2024jxi,Wright:2025xka,DES:2026fyc,Carron:2022eum,Qin:2025ggt,Lai:2025xkf,Qin:2025rwz} for recent cosmological constraints).\n\nA particularly useful framework for constraining the presence of dynamical dark energy systematically is the effective field theory of dark energy (EFTofDE) \\cite{Gubitosi:2012hu,Bloomfield:2012ff,Gleyzes:2013ooa,Bellini:2014fua,Gleyzes:2014rba} (essentially equivalent to the Horndeski class of modified gravity theories on a cosmological background \\cite{Horndeski:1974wa,Charmousis:2011bf,Deffayet:2011gz,Kobayashi:2011nu}) and related constructions (e.g. \\cite{Lagos:2016gep,Lagos:2017hdr}), that parametrise a wide class of theoretically well-motivated models of dark energy -- typically with a focus on linear perturbations, although non-linear extensions of these approaches exist, see e.g. \\cite{Kimura:2011dc,Takushima:2015iha,Cusin:2017mzw,Brando:2023fzu,Amendola:2025xka,Sirera:2026klo}. This complements more phenomenological approaches that e.g. parametrise modified gravity effects by explicitly modifying the Poisson-like equations relating the matter density perturbations to the Newtonian potential (which affects clustering of nonrelativistic matter) or the Weyl potential (which affects gravitational lensing of photons) \\cite{Caldwell:2007cw,Amendola:2007rr,Hu:2007pj,Jain:2007yk,Bertschinger:2008zb,Zhao:2008bn,Pogosian:2010tj,Zhao:2010dz,Silvestri:2013ne}. These phenomenological modifications can likewise be computed in EFTofDE approaches, so the EFTofDE can be used as a theoretical prior in deriving such phenomenological parametrisations as well (e.g. \\cite{Perenon:2016blf,Peirone:2017ywi,Espejo:2018hxa,Shah:2025vnt}). We will primarily use the EFTofDE framework here -- specifically we will work in the $\\alpha$-basis pioneered by \\cite{Bellini:2014fua,Gleyzes:2014rba}, which can be straightforwardly mapped to other related approaches. We will also link this to the phenomenological functions $\\mS$ described later. \n\nRecently, analyses focusing on deriving EFTofDE constraints by combining multiple recent LSS datasets (on top of the standard CMB+BAO+SNe probes of the background expansion) have started to appear: e.g. \\cite{Seraille:2024beb}, which obtains constraints combining CMB-galaxy cross-correlations probing the ISW effect and RSD measurements from BOSS and 6dF; \\cite{Ishak:2024jhs}, which combines DESI DR1 full shape measurements with $\\txtp$ data from DES Y3; \\cite{Stolzner:2025vet}, which combines cosmic shear from KiDS-Legacy with RSD from eBOSS; \\cite{Lu:2025sjg}, which combines CMB lensing and ISW-lensing cross-correlations from Planck PR4, full-shape information from BOSS, and photometric clustering data from DESI Legacy Imaging Survey DR9; and \\cite{Li:2026sbr}, which combines gravitational potential decay rates measured from DESI photometric clustering and Planck, the lensing-inferred amplitude of matter perturbations from cross-correlation of Planck anisotropies with galaxy surveys, and growth rate measurements from DESI DR1 clustering and the DESI DR1 peculiar velocity survey.\n\nIn this work, we derive constraints on the EFTofDE perturbations and background expansion by supplementing the CMB+BAO+SNe combination with RSD measurements from DESI DR1 \\cite{DESI:2025fii}, weak lensing $\\txtp$ measurements from DES Y3 \\cite{DES:2022ccp}, and ISW measurements from CMB-galaxy cross-correlations \\cite{Stolzner:2017ged} and CMB tempertaure-lensing cross-correlations \\cite{Carron:2022eyg,Carron:2022eum}. We present constraints from various combinations of these datasets to demonstrate the complementarity of these probes. Furthermore, we demonstrate and quantify how the posteriors of the background expansion and DE perturbations affect other due to the underlying physics of the gradient stability condition in the EFTofDE, and how this affects the observational significance of dynamical DE over a cosmological constant.\n\\\\\n \n{\\bf Outline}: \n%\nThis paper is organised as follows. We introduce the underlying theoretical EFTofDE framework we are using, as well as its relation to the phenomenological $\\mS$ functions in \\cref{sec:EFT}. This is followed by a detailed description of the datasets and likelihoods we are using in \\cref{sec:data}. In \\cref{sec:combining_probes_constraints} we then present constraints obtained from various combinations of probes, discuss their complementarity and what these constraints mean for DE phenomenology. In \\cref{sec:background_perts} we then focus specifically on the interplay between constraints on the DE background ($\\{w_0,w_a\\}$) and perturbation ($\\cBM$) parameters, and evaluate the observational significance of deviation from $\\lcdm$ in the EFTofDE model.\n%\nWe conclude in \\cref{sec:conclusions}, before collecting additional details in the appendices.\n%\nThroughout this paper we use natural units with $c = M_{pl} = 1$. We use dots to denote a derivative with respect to cosmic time.\n\n\\section{The EFT of Dark Energy} \\label{sec:EFT}\n\nThe Effective Field of Dark Energy (EFTofDE) is a widely used approach to describe a general Lagrangian for dark energy, unifying several classes of DE models where the role of DE is effectively played by a single scalar field \\cite{Gubitosi:2012hu,Bloomfield:2012ff,Gleyzes:2013ooa,Bellini:2014fua,Gleyzes:2014rba}. This approach enables the construction of the most general Lagrangian of the extra scalar degree of freedom compatible with the symmetries of the FLRW cosmological background up to a given order in derivatives/fields. In accordance with the symmetries of FLRW, the coefficients of the operators appearing in the EFTofDE Lagrangian do not depend on space to preserve spatial symmetry, and are free functions of time due to the broken time translation invariance of the FLRW background.\n\nThere has been significant progress in the past decade on developing a physically intuitive basis for the free functions of the EFTofDE \\cite{Bloomfield:2012ff,Gubitosi:2012hu,Bellini:2014fua,Lombriser:2018olq}, and on constraining a variety of aspects of DE and modified gravity from astrophysical and cosmological observations. We choose to work in the $\\alpha$-basis \\cite{Bellini:2014fua,Gleyzes:2014rba}, and focus on the three free functions in the EFTofDE that are the most promisingly constrained by cosmological probes: the DE equation of state $w(z)$, the braiding $\\alpha_B(z)$ describing the kinetic mixing between the scalar field and the metric, and the running of the Planck mass $\\alpha_M(z)$ describing the time variation of the effective Planck mass squared seen by tensor perturbations, $M^2$.\\footnote{This means we choose to investigate models where the speed of gravitational waves is the same as the speed of light. This is partially motivates by the near-simultaneous observations of GW170817 and GRB 170817A \\cite{TheLIGOScientific:2017qsa,Goldstein:2017mmi,Savchenko:2017ffs,LIGOScientific:2017zic,GBM:2017lvd} and what this implies for cosmological models when the resulting constraint on the gravitational wave speed is directly ported to cosmological scales \\cite{Creminelli:2017sry,Ezquiaga:2017ekz,Baker:2017hug}, but see \\cite{deRham:2018red} for why this involves non-trivial assumptions and \\cite{Harry:2022zey,LISACosmologyWorkingGroup:2022wjo,Baker:2022eiz,Sirera:2023pbs,Atkins:2024nvl} for possible ways to test these assumptions observationally. Furthermore, we choose a fiducial behaviour for the kineticity function $\\alpha_K$ (see the text below \\cref{cs2}), which is known to only affect dynamics beyond leading order in the quasi-static approximation \\cite{Bellini:2014fua}. See \\cite{Noller:2013wca,Sawicki:2015zya,Bellini:2019syt,Pace:2020qpj} for discussions of how and when this approximation is accurate.} \nOur main focus in this work is to study the complementarity of multiple probes and the interplay between background expansion and structure growth. We therefore adopt simple parametrisations of these functions that are widely used in the literature. We parametrise $w(z)$ with the CPL form \\cite{Chevallier:2000qy,Linder:2002et}\n\\begin{equation}\nw(a) = w_0 + w_a(1-a).\n\\end{equation}\nWe parametrise both $\\alpha_B(z)$ and $\\alpha_M(z)$ as \\cite{Bellini:2014fua}\n\\begin{equation}\n\\alpha_B = c_B\\Omega_{DE}(z),\\quad \\alpha_M(z) = c_M\\Omega_{DE}(z),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\Omega_{DE}(z)$ is the ratio of the energy density in DE to the critical density. This parametrisation for $\\{\\alpha_B(z), \\alpha_M(z)\\}$ is motivated by its simplicity of having a very small number of free parameters and by the assumption that DE and modified gravity are purely late-universe effects, such that gravity should return to GR at high redshifts\\footnote{For the same reason, the effective Planck mass $M^2$ is assumed to be unity at early times. $\\alpha_M$ describes its running via $\\alpha_M(a) = d\\ ln(M^2)/d\\ ln(a)$.}.\n\nAn important physical quantity is the sound speed of the scalar field perturbations. It is determined from the EFTofDE functions by the expression\n\n\\begin{gather}\\label{cs2}\nc_s^2(z) =\n\\dfrac{1}{D}\\Big\\{(2 - \\alpha_B)\\left(\\dfrac{1}{2}\\alpha_B + \\alpha_M - \\dfrac{\\dot{H}}{H^2}\\right) \n\\\\ \\nonumber \n- \\dfrac{3(\\rho_{tot} + p_{tot})}{H^2M^2} \n+ \\dfrac{\\dot{\\alpha_B}}{H}\\Big\\}\\ ,\n\\end{gather}\nwhere we have suppressed time-dependences on the RHS for clarity, $D \\equiv \\alpha_K + \\frac{3}{2}\\alpha_B^2$ with $\\alpha_K$ describing the kinetic term of the scalar field and $\\rho_{tot}+p_{tot}$ is the sum over all non-DE components (essentially equal to $\\rho_m$ for standard CDM at late times). $D >0$ is required for the absence of ghost instabilities. Since $\\alpha_K$ is unconstrained from subhorizon measurements, we fix it to $\\alpha_K = 0.1\\Omega_{DE}$ to ensure that $D >0$ is always satisfied. To avoid spurious numerical instabilities due to oscillations in the equations of motion near radiation domination, we add a small constant (0.01) to $\\alpha_K(z)$ called the \"kineticity\\_safe\" parameter in hi\\_class.\n\nThe phenomenological effects of the EFTofDE on linear cosmological perturbations are described by the relation between the gravitational potentials and the matter density perturbations, which are two Poisson-like equations: \\cite{Caldwell:2007cw,Amendola:2007rr,Hu:2007pj,Jain:2007yk,Bertschinger:2008zb,Zhao:2008bn,Pogosian:2010tj,Zhao:2010dz,Silvestri:2013ne}\n%\n\\begin{gather}\\label{Poisson_mu}\n\\dfrac{k^2}{a^2}\\Phi = -4\\pi G\\mu(z)\\rho_m\\delta_m\\ ,\\\\ \\label{Poisson_Sigma}\n\\dfrac{k^2}{a^2}(\\Phi+\\Psi) = -8\\pi G\\Sigma(z)\\rho_m\\delta_m\\ .\n\\end{gather}\nHere, $\\mu(z)$ describes the modification to the evolution of the Newtonian potential $\\Phi$ which affects the trajectories of non-relativistic matter, and $\\Sigma(z)$ describes the modification to the evolution of the Weyl potential $\\frac{1}{2}(\\Phi + \\Psi)$ which affects trajectories of light. Under the quasi-static approximations and assuming that the effective mass of the scalar field is light, we can assume that $\\mu(z)$ and $\\Sigma(z)$ are scale independent and they \ncan be expressed in terms of the EFTofDE parameters as \\cite{Bellini:2014fua}\n\\begin{gather} \\label{mu_qsa}\n\\mu(z) = \\dfrac{1}{M^2}\\left(1 + \\dfrac{(\\alpha_B + 2\\alpha_M)^2}{2Dc_s^2}\\right)\\ ,\\\\ \\label{Sigma_qsa}\n\\Sigma(z) = \\dfrac{1}{M^2}\\left(1 + \\dfrac{(\\alpha_B + \\alpha_M)(\\alpha_B + 2\\alpha_M)}{2Dc_s^2}\\right)\\ .\n\\end{gather}\n\n\\section{Datasets and methodology} \\label{sec:data}\n\nIn this section, we list all the complementary probes and corresponding datasets that we use to constrain modified gravity. We then explain how we modify our analysis choices to ensure that we don't combine correlated probes in the absence of a model for their covariance. We also explain how we compare the constraining power of different likelihood combinations on $\\cBM$, which is non-trivial due to their posteriors being highly non-Gaussian.\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\textwidth]{Figures/probes_and_datasets_6.pdf}\n \\caption{A graph showing all the likelihoods used in this work and their various possible combinations. We split our likelihoods into five blocks each representing a particular cosmological observable. Likelihoods in the same block probe very similar observables on overlapping regions of the universe, thus their covariance can be non-negligible, in which case combining them directly (without modelling the covariance) is unsound. Likelihoods probing different observables exhibit negligible correlations in their data vectors and systematics, and can therefore be combined without accounting for covariance; we use lines connecting the different blocks to represent all possible likelihood combinations. The underlined likelihoods are part of our minimal combination of probes that constrains EFTofDE perturbations $\\cBM$ to $\\mathcal{O}(1)$. The list of likelihoods used in this work are: Planck PR4 CamSpec \\cite{Rosenberg:2022sdy,Planck:2018lbu,Planck:2019nip}, Planck early-universe prior \\cite{Lemos:2023xhs}, DESI DR2 BAO \\cite{DESI:2025zgx}, DESI DR1 RSD+BAO \\cite{DESI:2024jxi}, Planck PR4 ISW-lensing \\cite{Carron:2022eum,Carron:2022eyg}, Planck $\\times$ galaxy surveys \\cite{Stolzner:2017ged,Seraille:2024beb}, Planck PR4 lensing \\cite{Carron:2022eyg}, DES Y3 $\\txtp$ \\cite{DES:2018gui,DES:2021rex,DES:2021wwk,DES:2022ccp}, and DES-Dovekie \\cite{DES:2025sig,DES:2024jxu}.}\n \\label{fig:probes_and_datasets}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\subsection{Likelihoods}\n\n\\begin{itemize}\n\n\\item{\\bf CMB:} Observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) are sensitive to effects of late-time dark energy and modified gravity mainly through the late Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect governed by the time evolution of the gravitational potentials due to dark energy, and the gravitational lensing of CMB photons carried out by large scale structure in the late universe. CMB data is also crucial for constraining the remaining cosmological parameters apart from those related to dark energy. We use the CMB primary anisotropies (CMB-A) and lensing reconstruction (CMB-L). For the primary anisotropies, for high multipoles we use the CamSpec likelihood built on the Planck PR4 NPIPE maps \\cite{Rosenberg:2022sdy}. The PR4 CamSpec likelihood has lower noise in the maps, and importantly, a lower significance of the lensing ($A_L$) anomaly compared to the official Planck 2018 likelihoods. In this work, we thus make the choice of fixing $A_L = 1$, noting that a preference for $A_L > 1$ is coincident with stronger preferences for modified gravity in a variety of modified gravity models when $A_L$ is fixed to unity, as shown by \\cite{Pogosian:2021mcs,Specogna:2024euz,Shah:2025vnt}. For low multipoles, we use the official Planck 2018 likelihoods \\cite{Planck:2018lbu,Planck:2019nip}. We also use the reconstruction of the CMB lensing potential using the Planck PR4 NPIPE maps \\cite{Carron:2022eyg}, which exhibits an increase in constraining power compared to CMB lensing from Planck PR3 due to less noise in the PR4 maps as well improvements in the lensing analysis pipeline.\n\nIn \\cref{sec:stability_prior}, we employ the CMB as a background-only probe of the late universe, like the BAO and SNe datasets. We do this with the help of the early universe prior derived from Planck PR4 maps, as obtained by the authors of \\cite{Lemos:2023xhs}. This is a Gaussian prior on parameters affecting the early universe obtained by marginalising over late-universe information in the CMB.\n\n\\item{\\bf RSD and BAO:} Galaxy redshift surveys measure baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), which constrains the cosmic expansion history via measurements of the transverse and radial BAO distance scales, $D_M(z)/r_d$ and $D_H(z)/r_d$, as a function of redshift. They also measure redshift space distortions (RSD) from full-shape measurements of the galaxy power spectrum, which constrain the growth rate of structure at various redshifts. We use RSD and BAO measurements from the DESI collaboration. When we use the BAO data without RSD data, we use the DESI DR2 likelihood \\cite{DESI:2025zgx}. When we include the RSD data, which are only publicly available for DESI DR1 at the time of writing, in order to account for the covariance between RSD and BAO measurements we switch back to DESI DR1 \\cite{DESI:2024jxi}, and we refer to the combination of RSD and BAO measurements with a consistent modelling of their cross-covariance as RSD+BAO. We marginalise over the shape information captured by the ShapeFit parameters in the DESI full-shape measurements, and only use the $f\\sigma_{s8}$ measurements in our analysis (where $s$ is the ratio of the sound horizon in the current cosmology to that in the reference cosmology of DESI and $\\sigma_{s8}$ is the amplitude of the matter power spectrum computed at the scale $R = s \\cdot 8h^{-1}$Mpc \\cite{Brieden:2021edu,Lai:2024bpl}). Since the analytical expression for the growth rate $f$ valid in $\\Lambda$CDM is not valid in EFTofDE, we perform an accurate numerical computation using the time derivative of the matter power spectrum amplitude $\\sigma_{s8}$.\\footnote{Technically, it is the power spectrum of only the clustering species: CDM + baryons i.e. $P_{cb}(k)$, that is used, rather than the total matter power spectrum $P_m(k)$ which also includes neutrinos. This is because scale-independence of growth and linear bias are better approximations for the power spectrum CDM + baryons \\cite{Castorina:2013wga}. Nevertheless, we have checked that switching between $P_{cb}(k)$ and $P_m(k)$ gives a negligible difference in our predictions of $f\\sigma_{s8}$.} As we show in \\cref{tab:eft_constraints} and explain in \\cref{sec:combining_probes_constraints}, the difference in constraining power between DESI DR2 and DR1 BAO is not substantial within EFTofDE when combined with probes of dark energy perturbations, and the posteriors for $\\{w_0, w_a\\}$ are very similar for the two BAO likelihoods.\n\n\\item{\\bf $\\bm{\\txtp}$:} This refers to joint measurements (performed by photometric galaxy surveys) of cosmic shear, galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing two-point correlation functions, which probe the growth of structure by constraining the gravitational lensing of the source galaxies' shapes by lens galaxies, the distribution of lens galaxies, and their cross-correlation. We use $\\txtp$ measurements with the covariance of the three probes from three years of observations by the DES collaboration (DES Y3) \\cite{DES:2018gui,DES:2021rex,DES:2021wwk,DES:2022ccp}. We use the linear scale cuts as provided by the collaboration obtained by the methods explained in \\cite{DES:2022ccp} since non-linear modelling requires additional assumptions about higher-order interactions \\cite{Kimura:2011td,Takushima:2015iha,Cusin:2017mzw}. The public DES Y3 likelihoods are interfaced with the CosmoSIS sampling code \\cite{Zuntz:2014csq} and rely on some $\\Lambda$CDM-like assumptions. We use the version of the likelihoods modified to work with Cobaya and to account for modified structure growth and lensing without any $\\Lambda$CDM approximations, which was earlier used in \\cite{Wang:2024uvw}.\n\n\\item{\\bf ISW effect:} The detection significance of the ISW effect in the autocorrelation of the CMB temperature anisotropies is severely limited due to cosmic variance and the fact that the effect is smeared over a wide range of redshifts. The ISW signal increases significantly in measurements of the cross-correlation of CMB temperature anisotropies with a late-universe probe of structure, such as galaxy positions or CMB lensing, measured on wide angular scales. We use two ISW likelihoods in this work, which use two different ways to detect the ISW signal:\n\n\\begin{itemize}\n\n\\item{$\\ITg$:} We use the ISW likelihood from \\cite{Seraille:2024beb} -- an EFTofDE-adapted version of the ISW likelihood in \\cite{Stolzner:2017ged} for $\\Lambda{}$CDM. This employs measurements of the ISW effect from the cross-correlation of CMB temperature anisotropies with galaxy number counts from a number of galaxy catalogs: 2MPZ \\cite{Bilicki:2013sza}, WISE $\\times$ SuperCOSMOS \\cite{Bilicki:2016irk}, SDSS-DR12 photo-z \\cite{Beck_2016}, SDSS-DR6 QSO \\cite{Richards:2008eq}, and NVSS \\cite{Condon:1998iy}. The likelihood also incorporates autocorrelations of the galaxy number counts to break the degeneracy between galaxy bias and the ISW signal. Furthermore, we employ a simplification of the bias modelling justified in \\cite{Seraille:2024beb}: namely we fix the redshift evolution of bias across all the bins of the same survey (such that $b_g(z) = b_{\\rm survey}(1 + z)$ for each survey), thus reducing the number of bias parameters from one per survey bin to one per survey.\n\n\\item{$\\ITk$:} We use the ISW signal measured from the lensing-ISW bispectrum from the cross-correlation of the Planck PR4 lensing quadratic estimator and temperature anisotropies \\cite{Carron:2022eum,Carron:2022eyg}.\\footnote{We refer to temperature-lensing cross-correlations as $C_\\ell^{T\\kappa}$ where $\\kappa$ represents lensing convergence, instead of $C_\\ell^{T\\phi}$ in the original references in order to avoid confusion with the gravitational potentials or the scalar field in the EFTofDE.}\n\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\item{\\bf SNe:} Measuring the apparent luminosity of Type-IA supernovae over a range of redshifts provides constraints on the cosmic expansion history. We use the DES-Dovekie likelihood \\cite{DES:2025sig}, which is a reanalysis of the DES 5-Year supernovae observations \\cite{DES:2024jxu}. We note that recent developments in supernova modelling have substantially increased the consistency of expansion history constraints from different supernova collaborations \\cite{Hoyt:2026fve}.\n\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\subsection{Likelihood combinations}\\label{sec:likelihood_combinations}\n\n\\cref{fig:probes_and_datasets} illustrates the mutual dependence of the various complementary probes and likelihoods that we use. Generally, different likelihoods for the same cosmological probe are expected to be correlated, while likelihoods of different probes can be considered to be mutually independent.\n\n\\begin{itemize}\n\n\\item{Minimal combination:} As our minimal combination of probes to constrain the EFTofDE background and perturbations, we combine the CMB anisotropies, CMB lensing, BAO, and SNe likelihoods. This combination, underlined in \\cref{fig:probes_and_datasets}, provides strong constraints on all cosmological parameters not directly describing dark energy, while placing $\\mathcal{O}(1)$ constraints on the perturbation parameters $\\cBM$, and strong constraints on the background expansion parameters $\\wzwa$, as the combination of CMB, BAO and SNe constrains the cosmic expansion history over a range of redshifts. We refer to this combination as \"minimal\" in the sense that although for constraints on the background expansion parameters $\\wzwa$, this set of probes is already state-of-the-art, for the constraints on the parameters $\\cBM$ describing DE perturbations, there is much room for improving the constraints by adding further probes of structure as we demonstrate in \\cref{sec:combining_probes_constraints}. Throughout this paper, we refer to the constraints on DE obtained from this dataset combination as the minimal constraints.\n\n\\item{Adding RSD}: The DESI RSD and BAO measurements are both inferred from galaxies observed by the same survey and so are correlated. In data combinations with only BAO data, we use the DESI DR2 BAO likelihood, and in data combinations with both RSD and BAO data we use the joint measurements of RSD and BAO from DESI DR1, in order to account for the cross-covariance between RSD and BAO measurements.\n\n\\item{Adding $\\txtp$:} The DES Y3 $\\txtp$ likelihood incorporates measurements of cosmic shear, galaxy clustering, and galaxy-galaxy lensing. At linear order in perturbation theory, cosmic shear and the lensing convergence $\\kappa$ are completely determined from each other, and so the $\\txtp$ likelihood has non-trivial correlations with CMB lensing and $\\ITk$ (as they also overlap in the redshift ranges and sky regions probed). In the absence of a covariance matrix between the corresponding observations, we thus cannot combine $\\txtp$ with CMB lensing or $\\ITk$, and when we add it to the minimal combination we are required to remove CMB lensing.\n\n\\item{Adding ISW:} The $\\ITg$ and $\\ITk$ likelihoods are naturally not independent\nsince both are based on extracting the ISW effect from the same CMB temperature anisotropies through cross-correlation. Since we do not have a model of their covariance, we cannot combine them in an analysis. The $\\ITg$ likelihood is largely independent of any of our other likelihoods, and can thus be safely combined with them neglecting the covariance. The $\\ITk$ likelihood, however, uses the same lensing potential reconstruction as the CMB lensing likelihood. The authors of \\cite{Carron:2022eum} take the covariance of the ISW signal with CMB lensing into account, and it is part of the likelihood evaluation, which allows us to combine $\\ITk$ with our minimal combination which includes CMB lensing without any extra modelling.\n\n\\end{itemize}\n\nWhen it comes to combining our various likelihoods that include galaxy clustering: namely DES $\\txtp$, $\\ITg$, and DESI RSD, we can safely treat each of these as mutually independent. DESI RSD is independent of the other two likelihoods because it is a growth rate measurement which contains spectroscopic information about galaxy clustering along the line of sight, while the other two likelihoods contain information about transverse galaxy clustering obtained from photometric galaxy catalogs. We expect the covariance between $\\txtp$ and $\\ITg$ to be negligible due to the limited overlap of the survey footprints, the differences in redshift distributions, and the different angular scales probed by the ISW and $\\txtp$ analyses.\n\nWe use the Cobaya code \\cite{Torrado:2020dgo,2019ascl.soft10019T} for MCMC sampling and deriving posteriors of the parameters. We adopt $R - 1 < 0.03$ as the convergence criterion for our chains. We use the GetDist code \\cite{Lewis:2019xzd} to compute convergence criteria, plot marginalised posteriors, and derive confidence limits on parameters.\n\n\\subsection{Quantifying and comparing constraining power for non-Gaussian posteriors}\\label{sec:quantifying_constraining_power}\n\nIn this work, we aim to understand and quantify how different probes of structure in the universe contribute to constraints on DE perturbations, how adding more probes improves the constraining power, and how different probes improve constraining power in complementary directions in the $\\cBM$ parameter space. These quantifications are non-trivial because the posteriors for $\\cBM$ are highly non-Gaussian as can be seen from \\crefrange{fig:adding_one_probe}{fig:adding_three_probes}. This non-Gaussianity is a consequence of the fact that the Poisson equations \\cref{Poisson_mu,Poisson_Sigma}, which are more directly connected to the observables, have a highly non-linear dependence on $\\cBM$ and a far more complex time dependence than $\\propto \\Omega_{DE}$ as a result.\n\nDue to this non-Gaussianity, traditional measures of posterior volume such as standard deviations of 1D marginalised posteriors or the traditional definition of the Figure of Merit (FoM) as being proportional to $(\\det\\bm{C})^{-1/2}$ where $\\bm{C}$ is the posterior covariance of $\\cBM$ are difficult to interpret. This expression for the FoM was originally given only for $\\wzwa$ \\cite{Albrecht:2006um} whose posteriors in standard analyses are Gaussian to a good approximation, and it doesn't have a helpful interpretation for non-Gaussian posteriors. One consequence of the non-Gaussianity is that the GR limit $(c_B, c_M) = (0, 0)$ is outside the 95\\% credible region for most of the posteriors in \\crefrange{fig:adding_one_probe}{fig:adding_three_probes}, but the individual parameters $c_B$ and $c_M$ appear more consistent with GR from most of these posteriors. In MCMC-sampled posteriors, the 68\\% credible intervals are the most robustly sampled, while the 95\\% and higher credible intervals are progressively more subject to numerical noise in the sampling. For these reasons, we use the following two metrics derived from the volume of the 68\\% credible regions of our 1D and 2D posteriors of $\\cBM$ to quantify constraining power of our probes:\n\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item{Posterior width of 1D posteriors:} We define the posterior width of $c_B$ or $c_M$ as the difference between the upper and lower 68\\% limits of the respective parameter. Note that all our 1D posteriors for $c_B$ or $c_M$ are unimodal and so the 68\\% credible regions are indeed a single continuous interval, however the definition of the posterior width as the volume of the 68\\% credible region is straightforward to generalise to multimodal posteriors.\n\n\\item{Figure of Merit (FoM) of 2D posteriors:} We define our FoM for $\\cBM$ as the inverse area of the 68\\% credible region of the 2D marginalised posterior of $\\cBM$, which is a modification to the definition of the FoM for $\\wzwa$ defined in \\cite{Albrecht:2006um} where it was defined as the inverse area of the 95\\% region. We choose the 68\\% regions as they are are more robust to sampling noise than the 95\\% regions. Since we are only interested in comparisons between FoMs of different dataset combinations/physical models, we normalise our FoM definition to set the FoM of the $\\cBM$ posterior of the minimal dataset combination to unity, as shown in the first row of \\cref{tab:eft_constraints}.\n\nNote that we compute our FoMs numerically, as the analytical relation FoM $\\propto (\\det \\bm{C})^{-1/2}$ where $\\bm{C}$ is the covariance matrix of the two parameters does not hold for non-Gaussian posteriors. To compute the FoM of our posteriors normalised with respect to the FoM of the minimal combination, we simply take the ratio\n\\begin{gather}\\label{fom_definition}\n\\text{FoM} \\equiv \\dfrac{\\text{Area of 68\\% contour in minimal combination}}{\\text{Area of 68\\% contour}}, \\nonumber\\\\ \n\\end{gather}\nwhere the areas are simply computed by counting cells over a grid in the $\\cBM$ space which lie inside the 68\\% credible region of their 2D posterior. The accuracy of this method with respect to grid resolution is easy to ensure by checking that FoMs are negligibly affected by increasing the grid resolution. Another potential concern is smoothing artefacts due to the fact that the posteriors plotted in the countours are smoothed versions of the true posteriors. We have checked that decreasing the smoothing scale by as much as a factor of 10 has a very marginal impact on the FoMs computed from \\cref{fom_definition}. Although the areas of specific 2D posteriors change by $\\mathcal{O}(10\\%)$, the effect cancels out in the ratios of areas of posteriors which only change by $\\mathcal{O}(1\\%)$.\n\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\section{Results: Constraints from combined probes}\\label{sec:combining_probes_constraints}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.4\\linewidth]{Figures/minimal_rsd_bm.pdf} \n \\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.4\\linewidth]{Figures/minimal_3x2pt_bm.pdf}\n \\end{subfigure}\n\n \\begin{subfigure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.4\\linewidth]{Figures/minimal_isw_bm.pdf}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.4\\linewidth]{Figures/minimal_pr4isw_bm.pdf}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption{The impact on the constraints on DE perturbations in the EFTofDE on adding an extra probe to our minimal combination of probes which comprises of CMB anisotropies (CMB-A) and CMB lensing (CMB-L) from Planck PR4 CamSpec, baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) from DESI DR2, and Type IA supernovae (SNe) from DES Y5. \\textbf{Upper left:} Adding DESI DR1 RSD. Note that when adding this dataset, we replace DESI DR2 BAO in our minimal combination with DR1 BAO in order to incorporate the publicly available covariance between DESI DR1 RSD and BAO measurements. \\textbf{Upper right:} Adding DES Y3 $\\txtp$. Note that when adding this dataset, we remove CMB lensing from our minimal combination as the covariance between $\\txtp$ and CMB lensing is non-negligible and unmodelled. \\textbf{Lower left:} Adding the CMB $\\times$ galaxies ISW likelihood ($\\ITg$). \\textbf{Lower right:} Adding the Planck PR4 ISW likelihood ($\\ITk$). In the RSD, $\\txtp$ and $\\ITg$ plots, we also highlight $\\cBM$ values of a particular sampled point from the posterior which is within the 95\\% credible region for the minimal combination but disfavoured on adding the extra probe; these samples are used to demonstrate the phenomenological regimes constrained by these probes in \\cref{sec:pheno_constraints}.}\n \\label{fig:adding_one_probe}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\subsection{Constraints from the minimal dataset combination and with each extra probe}\\label{sec:adding_one_probe}\n\nConstraints on $c_B$ and $c_M$ from our minimal combination of probes are shown in all panels of \\crefrange{fig:adding_one_probe}{fig:adding_three_probes}, as these constraints are the baseline against which we compare when we add further probes of DE perturbations. It should be noted that CMB lensing is playing a very significant role in constraining power here. Without CMB lensing, the constraining power of the CMB primary anisotropies alone on late-time perturbations is very weak \\cite{Noller:2018wyv}.\n\\\\\n\n{\\bf The impact of adding growth rate measurements}:\n%\nIn the upper left panel of \\cref{fig:adding_one_probe}, we show the impact of adding RSD data to our minimal likelihood setup. We find an improvement in the uncertainties on $c_M$ (a 22\\% decrease in the posterior width), but no significant change in the constraining power on $c_B$. The overall FoM improves by a factor of 1.41 which is a larger gain than that expected from the product of the 1D marginalised posteriors, due to the fact that lowering $c_M$ weakens one of the two degeneracy directions between $c_B$ and $c_M$ seen in the minimal combination posterior. As explained in \\cref{sec:likelihood_combinations}, when including RSD data from DESI DR1, we also swap out the DESI DR2 BAO data in our minimal combination with DESI DR1, to properly account for correlations between RSD and BAO. However, compared to GR, within our EFTofDE model the effect of this choice on the background constraints is very small, in the form of a small increase in uncertainties, as seen from \\cref{tab:eft_constraints}. This is due to the fact that in the EFTofDE, deviations of $\\{w_0, w_a\\}$ away from $\\lcdm$ are also constrained by a theoretical prior in the form of the gradient stability condition and the constraining power on perturbations, rather than just the constraining power on the background (see \\cref{sec:background_perts} for a detailed investigation of this phenomenon). The impact of RSD data on the 95\\% credible region is qualitatively similar to that on the 68\\% region.\n\nGrowth rate predictions of various EFTofDE models have been compared with data for for nearly a decade \\cite{Tsujikawa:2015mga,Perenon:2015sla,Bellini:2015xja,Hu:2016zrh,Kreisch:2017uet,Noller:2018wyv,Perenon:2019dpc,Seraille:2024beb,Shah:2025vnt} It is interesting to see how constraints on the EFTofDE have evolved with the evolution in RSD datasets from earlier compilations including BOSS and several other surveys, to eBOSS, to DESI. We can compare our results quantitatively with works that constrain the $\\alpha$ basis parameters with MCMC analyses. In particular, we compare the constraints on $c_M$, since the top left panel of \\cref{fig:adding_one_probe} demonstrates that $c_M$ is the parameter for which the posterior is impacted the most by adding RSD data. An early such analysis was performed by \\cite{Bellini:2015xja}, but probing a different model space than we do here -- also varying the speed of gravitational waves which strongly prefers to be subluminal for their dataset combination -- as well as considering a large set of RSD measurements also different from the more recent data sets explored here. \n\\cite{Noller:2018wyv} then probed the same model space as considered here and used a small set of uncorrelated RSD measurements: specifically from 6dF \\cite{Beutler:2012px} and BOSS DR11 CMASS \\cite{BOSS:2013yzh}.\\footnote{In this analysis, potentially highly correlated BAO measurements -- specifically the BOSS DR11 CMASS anisotropic BAO measurement -- were excluded in order to ensure robustness.}\n%\nThe resulting constraints on $c_M$ yield $\\Delta c_M \\sim 1.5$, which is similar to the constraints obtained with the newer eBOSS DR16 RSD and BAO measurements \\cite{Howlett:2014opa,BOSS:2016wmc,eBOSS:2020yzd, BOSS:2016wmc, eBOSS:2020hur, eBOSS:2020uxp, eBOSS:2020tmo} in \\cite{Shah:2025vnt}, and the ones obtained here with the state-of-the-art DESI DR1 measurements. The high constraining power of early RSD datasets on $c_M$ does not indicate the precision of those datasets but rather their effective redshifts. Since the $\\Omega_{DE}$ parametrisation has much stronger phenomenological effects at low redshifts, a growth rate measurement at low redshift is much more constraining on this parametrisation than a measurement of comparable precision at high redshift. In this case, the 6dF RSD measurement is very powerful to constrain $c_M$. In this work, we remain conservative in our RSD dataset choice in the sense that we employ the most recent compilation of RSD and BAO measurements from a single survey, which is DESI DR1 at the time of writing. A much more recent low-redshift measurement of $f\\sigma_8$ comes from the DESI peculiar velocity survey \\cite{Qin:2025ggt,Lai:2025xkf,Qin:2025rwz}. We leave the use of these measurements to obtain EFTofDE constraints to future work.\n\\\\\n\n{\\bf The impact of adding $\\bm{\\txtp}$ correlations}:\n%\nIn the upper right panel of \\cref{fig:adding_one_probe} we show the impact of replacing the CMB lensing likelihood in our minimal set of probes with DES Y3 $\\txtp$ measurements. As explained in \\cref{sec:likelihood_combinations}, we remove the CMB lensing likelihood because we expect non-negligible correlations between the CMB lensing and $\\txtp$ observables, for which we don't have a model. We see a 27\\% reduction in the posterior width of $c_B$ and a reduction of 20\\% in the posterior width of $c_M$, with an overall improvement by a factor of 1.71 in the FoM. In the 95\\% credible region, the posterior tail on the lower right is reduced but still visible, while it is largely removed in the 68\\% region.\n\nThe same panel also acts as a comparison of the constraining power of CMB lensing and $\\txtp$ on DE perturbations. Evidently, $\\txtp$ is a significantly stronger probe than CMB lensing, even when only using data from linear scales. A few factors contribute to this difference: 1) the difference in the amount of information in the two likelihoods, 2) the presence of redshift tomography in the DES $\\txtp$ measurements which allows for a higher resolution in redshift as opposed to the CMB lensing likelihood that measures a single redshift integral in the form of the observed lensing convergence of the CMB, and 3) the choice of parametrisation $\\alpha_i \\propto \\Omega_{DE}$, which has weaker effects on phenomenology at higher redshifts, combined with the fact that CMB lensing is sensitive to higher redshifts than $\\txtp$.\n\\\\\n\n{\\bf The impact of adding the ISW effect}:\n%\nIn the lower left panel of \\cref{fig:adding_one_probe}, we see the effect of adding the CMB $\\times$ galaxy surveys ($\\ITg$) likelihood to our minimal setup. We find a shift in the means of both $c_B$ and $c_M$ compared to the minimal combination. For $c_B$, the upper and lower uncertainties change, but the change in the posterior width is very marginal (only a 6\\% reduction) compared to the minimal combination. The posterior width of $c_M$ is decreased by 24\\% compared to the minimal combination. The 2D FoM improves by a factor of 1.54. The $\\ITg$ likelihood also significantly affects constraints on the background expansion, and we find that constraints on $w_0-w_a$ are shifted towards $\\lcdm$ in all dataset combinations that include $\\ITg$, as shown in \\cref{tab:eft_constraints}. Apart from the Planck CMB likelihoods, this is the only likelihood in our setup that has a significant impact on the posteriors of both the DE background and perturbations.\n\nIn the 98\\% region, we see a reduction in the lower right tail on adding $\\ITg$, which is similar to that seen with the addition of the $\\txtp$ and $\\ITk$ likelihoods. However, a unique feature of adding the $\\ITg$ likelihood is an extension of the 95\\% credible region in the direction of positively correlated $\\cBM$. In fact, in the lower left panel of \\cref{fig:adding_one_probe}, the imposed range on the plot (in order to facilitate easier comparison with the other plots) cuts off a very small island of the 95\\% credible region that appears on adding $\\ITg$ to our minimal combination. We discuss the physical origin of this island and consistency checks in \\cref{app-ISW}.\n\nThe lower right panel of \\cref{fig:adding_one_probe} shows the impact of adding the Planck PR4 ISW ($\\ITk$) likelihood to our minimal combination. We find that the posterior mean of $c_B$ is shifted to a lower value, with a 19\\% reduction of the posterior width. We also find a shift in the mean $c_M$, and 13\\% reduction of the posterior width of $c_M$ compared to the minimal combination. The 2D FoM improves by a factor of 1.42. For the background expansion constraints, we find that adding the $\\ITk$ does not have a substantial effect apart from a slight decrease in uncertainties. For the 95\\% credible region, the impact of the $\\ITk$ likelihood is qualitatively similar to that of the $\\txtp$ likelihood as seen from \\cref{fig:adding_one_probe}.\n\n\\subsection{Multiprobe combinations and complementarity of probes}\\label{sec:multiprobe_constraints}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.4\\linewidth]{Figures/minimal_rsd_3x2pt_bm.pdf}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.4\\linewidth]{Figures/minimal_isw_3x2pt_bm.pdf}\n \\end{subfigure}\n\n \\begin{subfigure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.4\\linewidth]{Figures/minimal_rsd_isw_bm.pdf}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.4\\linewidth]{Figures/minimal_rsd_pr4isw_bm.pdf}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption{The impact on the constraints on DE perturbations in the EFTofDE on adding two complementary probes to our minimal combination of probes which comprises of CMB anisotropies (CMB-A) and CMB lensing (CMB-L) from Planck PR4 CamSpec, baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) from DESI DR2, and Type IA supernovae (SNe) from DES Y5. We overplot the contours from adding each probe individually as shown in \\cref{fig:adding_one_probe} to demonstrate the degree of complementarity of the probes. \\textbf{Upper left:} Adding DESI DR1 RSD and DES Y3 $\\txtp$. \\textbf{Upper right:} Adding DES Y3 $\\txtp$ and the CMB $\\times$ galaxies ISW likelihood ($\\ITg$). \\textbf{Lower left:} Adding RSD and $\\ITg$. \\textbf{Lower right:} Adding RSD and the Planck PR4 ISW likelihood ($\\ITk$). Note that when adding DESI DR1 RSD, we replace DESI DR2 BAO in our minimal combination with DR1 BAO in order to incorporate the publicly available covariance between DESI DR1 RSD and BAO measurements. Note that when adding DES Y3 $\\txtp$, we remove CMB lensing from our minimal combination as the covariance between $\\txtp$ and CMB lensing is non-negligible and unmodelled. Also, note that $\\ITk$ cannot be directly combined with $\\ITg$ or $\\txtp$ due to non-negligible covariances (see \\cref{sec:likelihood_combinations}).}\n \\label{fig:adding_two_probes}\n\\end{figure*}\n\nIn this subsection, we present constraints from combining multiple probes of late-time cosmological perturbations with our probes of the background expansion and CMB lensing. We demonstrate that constraints from different LSS probes are highly complementary, and thus their combination provides stronger and more robust constraints on the entire theory space rather than a single parameter.\n\nThe upper left panel of \\cref{fig:adding_two_probes} shows the highly complementary nature of the constraining power of RSD and $\\txtp$ measurements on DE perturbations. We see a 39\\% reduction in the posterior width of $c_B$ and 40\\% for $c_M$, with a 2.42 factor improvement in the 2D FoM. This is a result of the existence of two phenomenological degrees of freedom in the EFTofDE: modifications to structure growth and modifications to lensing. The two degrees of freedom can be represented by the $\\mu(z)$ and $\\Sigma(z)$ functions in modified Poisson equations as in \\cref{Poisson_mu,Poisson_Sigma}. Although $\\mu(z)$ and $\\Sigma(z)$ are more correlated in the EFTofDE than in purely phenomenological parametrisations \\cite{Perenon:2016blf,Peirone:2017ywi,Espejo:2018hxa,Shah:2025vnt}, they are still non-degenerate and thus probes of structure growth and lensing are complementary.\n\nThe upper right panel of \\cref{fig:adding_two_probes} shows the constraints obtained from combining $\\txtp$ measurements with $\\ITg$. We see a 26\\% reduction in the posterior width of $c_B$ and 34\\% for $c_M$, with a 2.24 factor improvement in the 2D FoM, slightly more than the increase anticipated from the simple product of the 1D posterior widths of $c_B$ and $c_M$. This can be understood by there being only one prominent direction in the posterior compared to two prominent degeneracy directions in the posterior of the minimal combination. Looking at the 95\\% credible regions, the combination of $\\txtp$ and $\\ITg$ removes the narrow tail at the bottom right of the $\\cBM$ posterior which is present in constraints with the minimal combination as well as in constraints with either one of the $\\txtp$ or $\\ITg$ likelihoods. The $\\txtp$ and $\\ITg$ likelihoods are both strong probes of lensing but weak probes of clustering, while RSD is a strong clustering probe and weak lensing probe. Thus, the $\\txtp$ + $\\ITg$ combination affects the $\\cBM$ posterior in a different direction than the RSD likelihood.\n\nThe lower left panel of \\cref{fig:adding_two_probes} shows the constraints obtained from combining RSD measurements with $\\ITg$. We see a 22\\% reduction in the posterior width of $c_B$ and 38\\% for $c_M$, with a 1.95 factor improvement in the 2D FoM. Interestingly, neither of the $\\ITg$ or RSD likelihoods improves the $c_B$ posterior width when added individually to the minimal combination, but on combining both of them we do find an improvement in the posterior width of $c_B$.\n\nThe lower right panel of \\cref{fig:adding_two_probes} shows the constraints obtained from combining RSD measurements with $\\ITk$. We see a 27\\% reduction in the posterior width of $c_B$ and 20\\% for $c_M$, with a 1.86 factor improvement in the 2D FoM, slightly more than the increase anticipated from the simple product of the 1D posteriors of $c_B$ and $c_M$. Note also that despite the 68\\% credible region of the smoothed 2D posterior being bimodal, we have found that the two peaks are connected in the unsmoothed posterior.\n\nFinally, in \\cref{fig:adding_three_probes} we show the constraints obtained from adding RSD, $\\txtp$, and $\\ITg$ measurements to the minimal combination. This is our most constraining combination of probes of DE perturbations We see a 35\\% reduction in the posterior width of $c_B$ and 44\\% for $c_M$, with a 2.69 factor improvement in the 2D FoM. The specific strengths of the three complementary probes are as follows: RSD data increases constraining power on $c_M$ by lowering the upper limit of the posterior, $\\txtp$ data cuts off the posterior region in the direction of low $c_M$ and high $c_B$, and $\\ITg$ data lowers the mean of the $c_B$ posterior and cuts off the lower right tail of the posterior along low $c_M$ and high $c_B$. The impact of the three probes on the 95\\% credible region is qualitatively similar to that on the 68\\% region. We also show the corresponding constraints on the expansion history, where the shift in the posterior compared to the minimal combination is primarily caused by the $\\ITg$ likelihood, as seen from the $\\wzwa$ constraints reported in \\cref{tab:eft_constraints}.\n\n\\begin{figure*}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.4375\\linewidth]{Figures/minimal_rsd_isw_3x2pt_bm.pdf}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.45\\linewidth]{Figures/minimal_rsd_isw_3x2pt_w0wa.pdf}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption{Strong constraints on the EFTofDE perturbations and background expansion obtained by adding three complementary probes of cosmological perturbations: DESI DR1 RSD, DES Y3 $\\txtp$, and the $\\ITg$ likelihood \\cite{Stolzner:2017ged,Seraille:2024beb} probing the ISW effect. We avoid unmodelled non-negligible covariances between different probes as explained in \\cref{sec:likelihood_combinations}. \\textbf{Left panel:} Constraints on the parameters controlling linear perturbations $\\cBM$. The plot showcases the complementarity of the various probes of structure in the late universe as it shows how they improve constraining power in different directions in the parameter space: adding RSD improves constraints on $c_M$, adding $\\txtp$ improves constraints on $c_B$, and adding $\\ITg$ eliminates the lower tail of the $\\cBM$ posterior, removing a degeneracy direction. \\textbf{Right panel:} Constraints on $\\wzwa$. The constraints found from the minimal combination of probes comprising of CMB+BAO+SNe incorporate EFTofDE physics and are different from the constraints on $\\wzwa$ obtained in the standard $w_0w_a$CDM model from the same dataset combination -- this effect is explained in detail in \\cref{sec:background_perts}. The shift in the constraints from the minimal combination to the final probe combination is entirely caused by the constraining power of the $\\ITg$ likelihood on the background expansion. \\cref{tab:eft_constraints} lists the 1D marginalised constraints on these parameters from all the dataset combinations considered in this work.}\n \\label{fig:adding_three_probes}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{table*}[]\n \\centering\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.5}\n\\begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|}\n\\hline\n\\backslashbox{Datasets}{Parameter} & $c_B$ & $c_M$ & $w_0$ & $w_a$ & FoM($\\cBM$) \\\\\n\\hline\\hline\nMinimal: CMB-A + CMB-L + BAO + SNe & $0.66^{+0.25}_{-0.37}$ & $0.74^{+0.63}_{-1.1}$ & $-0.847\\pm 0.053$ & $-0.50\\pm 0.20$ & 1.00 \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal + RSD & $0.62^{+0.23}_{-0.36}$ & $0.42^{+0.52}_{-0.82}$ & $-0.847\\pm 0.059$ & $-0.53^{+0.25}_{-0.22}$ & 1.41 \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal + $\\txtp$ & $0.45^{+0.14}_{-0.32}$ & $1.11^{+0.49}_{-0.92}$ & $-0.846\\pm 0.052$ & $-0.49\\pm 0.19$ & 1.71 \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal + $\\ITg$ & $0.49^{+0.13}_{-0.45}$ & $1.37^{+0.29}_{-1.0}$ & $-0.872\\pm 0.053$ & $-0.39^{+0.18}_{-0.21}$ & 1.54 \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal + $\\ITk$ & $0.44^{+0.17}_{-0.33}$ & $1.04^{+0.64}_{-0.86}$ & $-0.850\\pm 0.051$ & $-0.48\\pm 0.18$ & 1.42 \\\\\n\\hhline{|=||=|=|=|=|=|}\nMinimal + RSD + $\\txtp$ & $0.35^{+0.14}_{-0.24}$ & $0.82^{+0.40}_{-0.64}$ & $-0.850\\pm 0.056$ & $-0.50\\pm 0.21$ & 2.42 \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal + $\\ITg$ + $\\txtp$ & $0.41^{+0.09}_{-0.37}$ & $1.24^{+0.25}_{-0.90}$ & $-0.870\\pm 0.052$ & $-0.39^{+0.18}_{-0.20}$ & 2.24 \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal + RSD + $\\ITg$ & $0.35^{+0.16}_{-0.32}$ & $1.01^{+0.38}_{-0.70}$ & $-0.882\\pm 0.054$ & $-0.37\\pm 0.20$ & 1.95 \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal + RSD + $\\ITk$ & $0.40^{+0.15}_{-0.30}$ & $0.74\\pm 0.69$ & $-0.856\\pm 0.055$ & $-0.49\\pm 0.21$ & 1.86 \\\\\n% \\hline\n% \\rowcolor{magenta}Minimal + $\\ITk$ + $\\txtp$ & $0.36^{+0.13}_{-0.27}$ & $1.09^{+0.43}_{-0.81}$ & $-0.848\\pm 0.050$ & $-0.48\\pm 0.18$ & 2.07 \\\\\n\\hhline{|=||=|=|=|=|=|}\nMinimal + RSD + $\\ITg$ + $\\txtp$& $0.29^{+0.13}_{-0.27}$ & $0.95^{+0.34}_{-0.63}$ & $-0.880\\pm 0.053$ & $-0.37\\pm 0.19$ & 2.69 \\\\\n% \\hline\n% \\rowcolor{magenta}Minimal + RSD + $\\ITk$ + $\\txtp$ & $0.30^{+0.12}_{-0.22}$ & $0.87^{+0.34}_{-0.62}$ & $-0.855\\pm 0.054$ & $-0.47\\pm 0.19$ & 2.83 \\\\\n\\hhline{|=||=|=|=|=|=|}\nMinimal, $\\lcdm$ background & $0.96^{+0.30}_{-0.43}$ & $1.7^{+1.0}_{-1.6}$ & - & - & 0.69 \\\\\n\\hline\nCMB-A, CMB-L, $\\lcdm$ background & $0.74^{+0.30}_{-0.43}$ & $1.29^{+0.73}_{-1.4}$ & - & - & 0.74 \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal + RSD + $\\ITg$, $\\lcdm$ background & $0.47^{+0.27}_{-0.31}$ & $1.42^{+0.65}_{-0.76}$ & - & - & 1.62 \\\\\n\\hline\n\\hhline{|=||=|=|=|=|=|}\nMinimal (GR) & - & - & $-0.807\\pm 0.056$ & $-0.73^{+0.23}_{-0.21}$ & - \\\\\n\\hline\nCMB-early + BAO + SNe & - & - & $-0.818\\pm 0.057$ & $-0.64^{+0.24}_{-0.22}$ & - \\\\\n\\hline\n% CMB-early + BAO + SNe (GR) & - & - & $-0.817\\pm 0.058$ & $-0.65^{+0.25}_{-0.22}$ & - \\\\\n% \\hline\n\\end{tabular}\n\n \\caption{Constraints on the parameters describing modified gravity perturbations $\\cBM$ and background expansion $\\wzwa$ for all the dataset combinations discussed in the main text. This table shows the means and the 68\\% uncertainties on the parameters. Our FoM for $\\cBM$ is defined as the area of the 68\\% credible region of their 2D posterior -- see \\cref{sec:quantifying_constraining_power} for more details. The abbreviations for the datasets here refer to the following -- CMB-A: Planck PR4 CMB anisotropies, CMB-L: Planck PR4 CMB lensing, BAO: DESI DR2, SNe: DES-Dovekie, RSD+BAO: DESI DR1 joint RSD+BAO, $\\txtp$: DES Y3, $\\ITg$: ISW from CMB-galaxy cross-correlations, $\\ITk$: ISW from CMB temperature and CMB lensing cross-correlations. See \\cref{sec:data} for details on the datasets.}\n \\label{tab:eft_constraints}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\subsection{Constraints on modified gravity phenomenology}\\label{sec:pheno_constraints}\n\nAlthough the functional degrees of freedom in the EFTofDE are $\\{\\alpha_B(z), \\alpha_M(z)\\}$, the combinations of these parameters that affect the phenomenology more directly are the ones that appear in the Poisson equations \\cref{Poisson_mu,Poisson_Sigma}: namely $\\{\\mu(z), \\Sigma(z)\\}$. As seen from \\cref{mu_qsa,Sigma_qsa}, they have a highly nontrivial dependence on $\\{\\alpha_B(z), \\alpha_M(z)\\}$ and are also sensitive to their time derivatives via $c_s^2$ and past evolution via $M^2$. This translates to a highly nonlinear dependence on the varied parameters $\\cBM$. We describe the constraints obtained on modified gravity phenomenology in the EFTofDE model with our various probes in two ways: for a quantitative description, we compute the posterior widths and FoMs for the present day values of $\\{\\mu(z), \\Sigma(z)\\}$, and for a more qualitative yet physically insightful description, we show how each of our probes of clustering and lensing disfavours a particular regime of modified gravity phenomenology by disfavouring specific time evolutions of $\\{\\mu(z), \\Sigma(z)\\}$.\n\nWe consider the present day values of $\\{\\mu(z), \\Sigma(z)\\}$ denoted $\\mSt$ (analogous to how $\\cBM$ are related to the present day values of $\\{\\alpha_B(z), \\alpha_M(z)\\}$ but without an extra $\\Omega_{DE}$ factor), and we compute the 1D marginalised constraints and FoM values for the phenomenological parameters. In \\cref{fig:minimal_rsd_isw_3x2pt_musigma}, we show the significant improvement in the constraints on $\\mSt$ obtained by adding RSD, $\\txtp$, and $\\ITg$ measurements to our minimal combination. The combination of various probes of cosmic structure places the observational constraints firmly in the regime of $\\mt > 1,\\ \\St < 1$, as was also noted in \\cite{Shah:2025vnt}, and is interesting considering that in the prior space of $\\cBM$ it is far more likely to have $\\mt < 1,\\ \\St < 1$ or $\\mt > 1,\\ \\St > 1$ \\cite{Pogosian:2016ji}. There is an observational precedent for probes of lensing indicating a suppression in either structure growth or gravity: this is captured by the so-called $S_8$ tension within $\\Lambda$CDM cosmology, referring to lower values of the parameter $S_8 \\equiv \\sigma_8(\\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}$ (see \\cite{CosmoVerseNetwork:2025alb} for a recent review) and by direct measurements of the Weyl potential inferring values below the predictions of GR \\cite{Tutusaus:2023aux,Rosatello:2026znt}. The FoM for $\\mSt$ computed using the area of the 68\\% contour (the same as we do for $\\cBM$) for the combination of RSD, $\\txtp$ and $\\ITg$ is higher by a factor of 3.37 compared to the FoM of the minimal combination. \\cref{tab:musigma} shows the 1D marginalised constraints and FoMs of $\\mSt$ for all our data combinations. In general, we see that the improvements in FoMs of $\\mSt$ in \\cref{tab:musigma} for most data combinations are higher than the improvements on $\\cBM$ for the same data combinations shown in \\cref{tab:eft_constraints}.\n\nThe present-day values of $\\mSt$ are not always a good proxy for their evolution across cosmic history since in EFTofDE models $\\{\\mu(z), \\Sigma(z)\\}$ may not have a monotonic evolution and may even cross unity, switching between enhancement and suppression of gravity. It is thus useful to look at the evolution of $\\{\\mu(z), \\Sigma(z)\\}$ across redshifts. In particular, we can see how each of our cosmic probes disfavours a particular regime of modified gravity phenomenology. In \\cref{fig:adding_one_probe}, we indicate the particular points in the $\\cBM$ parameter space that are allowed in our minimal constraints but disfavoured by each of the RSD, $\\txtp$ and $\\ITg$ likelihoods. We identify the particular features in the time evolution of $\\mu(z)$ or $\\Sigma(z)$ corresponding to these parts of the parameter space, and plot these in \\cref{fig:newprobes_disfavoured_musigma_evolution} to show how each individual probe of cosmic structure constrains modified gravity phenomenology. In particular, we find that the RSD data rules out $\\mu(z)\\ \\gsim\\ 0.2$ at low redshifts $z\\ \\lsim\\ 2$, the $\\txtp$ data rules out $\\Sigma(z)\\ \\gsim\\ 0.1$ at low redshifts $z\\ \\lsim\\ 2$, and the $\\ITg$ data rules out negative values of $\\frac{d}{dz}\\Sigma(z)$ (ie. higher $\\Sigma(z)$ at later times) at very low redshifts $z\\ \\lsim\\ 0.5$.\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{Figures/minimal_rsd_isw_3x2pt_musigma.pdf}\n \\caption{Constraints on the present-day values $\\mSt$ of the phenomenological parameters describing modifications to the evolution of gravitational potentials in the EFTofDE according to \\cref{Poisson_mu,Poisson_Sigma}. As shown earlier in \\cref{fig:adding_three_probes}, we show how each individual probe contributes to the constraints from the minimal combination of probes, resulting in strong constraints obtained with the combination with the most probes. We also show how an individual sample disfavoured by each extra probe individually in the $\\cBM$ plane, shown in \\cref{fig:adding_one_probe}, maps to the phenomenologial $\\mSt$ plane. Constraints from all the various dataset combinations considered in this work are in \\cref{tab:musigma}. These results are elaborated and complemented by looking at the past evolution of $\\{\\mu(z), \\Sigma(z)\\}$ in \\cref{sec:pheno_constraints} and \\cref{fig:newprobes_disfavoured_musigma_evolution}.}\n \\label{fig:minimal_rsd_isw_3x2pt_musigma}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.45\\linewidth]{Figures/newprobes_disfavoured_mu.pdf} \n \\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.4615\\linewidth]{Figures/newprobes_disfavoured_sigma.pdf}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption{The cosmic evolutions of $\\{\\mu(z), \\Sigma(z)\\}$ for some samples within the 95\\% posteriors in the minimal combination that are disfavoured by each extra probe -- these are the samples shown in the $\\cBM$ plane in \\cref{fig:adding_one_probe} along with a few samples with nearby $\\cBM$ values. The major conclusions from these plots are: 1) RSD data disfavours strong enhancements to matter clustering over cosmic history as shown by the left panel, 2) $\\txtp$ data disfavours strong enhancements to lensing over cosmic history as shown by the right panel, 3) $\\ITg$ data constraints the sign of the time evolution of the Weyl potential $\\Phi+\\Psi$ at low redshifts $z\\ \\lsim\\ 0.5$ as shown by the right panel. Also, different points in the $\\cBM$ plane can map to very similar $\\mSt$ values as shown by both panels.}\n \\label{fig:newprobes_disfavoured_musigma_evolution}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{table*}[]\n \\centering\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.5}\n\\begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|}\n\\hline\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Datasets} & $\\mt$ & $\\St$ & FoM \\\\\n& & & ($\\mt, \\St$) \\\\\n\\hline\\hline\n%\\hline\nMinimal: CMB-A + CMB-L + BAO + SNe & $0.18^{+{0.06}}_{-{0.13}}$ & $0.02^{+{0.12}}_{-{0.13}}$ & 1.00 \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal + RSD & $0.17^{+{0.05}}_{-{0.12}}$ & $0.05\\pm 0.11$ & 1.29 \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal + ISW-$Tg$ & $0.12^{+{0.04}}_{-{0.12}}$ & $-0.09^{+{0.06}}_{-{0.07}}$ & 1.94 \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal + ISW-$T\\kappa$ &$0.11^{+{0.04}}_{-{0.09}}$ & $-0.08^{+{0.08}}_{-{0.10}}$ & 1.70 \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal + 3$\\times$2pt & $0.11^{+{0.04}}_{-{0.09}}$ & $-0.07^{+{0.07}}_{-{0.08}}$ & 2.09 \\\\\n\\hhline{|=||=|=|=|}\nMinimal + RSD + ISW-$Tg$ & $0.10^{+{0.04}}_{-{0.09}}$ & $-0.08^{+{0.06}}_{-{0.07}}$ & 2.34 \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal + RSD + ISW-$T\\kappa$ & $0.11^{+{0.03}}_{-{0.10}}$ & $-0.05^{+{0.08}}_{-{0.09}}$ & 2.03 \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal + RSD + 3$\\times$2pt & $0.09^{+{0.04}}_{-{0.08}}$ & $-0.06^{+{0.06}}_{-{0.07}}$ & 2.70 \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal + ISW-$Tg$ + 3$\\times$2pt & $0.10^{+{0.04}}_{-{0.10}}$ & $-0.09^{+{0.05}}_{-{0.05}}$ & 2.84 \\\\\n\\hline\n\\hhline{|=||=|=|=|}\nMinimal + RSD + ISW-$Tg$ + 3$\\times$2pt & $0.08^{+{0.04}}_{-{0.08}}$ & $-0.09^{+{0.05}}_{-{0.05}}$ & 3.37 \\\\\n\\hline\n\\hhline{|=||=|=|=|}\nCMB-early + BAO + SNe & - & - & - \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal, $\\lcdm$ background & $0.29^{+{0.09}}_{-{0.12}}$ & $0.01^{+{0.12}}_{-{0.16}}$ & 0.74 \\\\\n\\hline\nMinimal + RSD + ISW-$Tg$, $\\lcdm$ background & $0.17\\pm0.07$ & $-0.08^{+{0.06}}_{-{0.07}}$ & 2.24 \\\\\n\\hline\n\\end{tabular}\n \\caption{Constraints on the phenomenological parameters $\\mSt$ for all the dataset combinations discussed in the main text. This table shows the means and the 68\\% uncertainties on the parameters. Our FoM for $\\mSt$ is defined as the area of the 68\\% credible region of their 2D posterior -- see \\cref{sec:quantifying_constraining_power} for more details. The abbreviations for the datasets here refer to the following -- CMB-A: Planck PR4 CMB anisotropies, CMB-L: Planck PR4 CMB lensing, BAO: DESI DR2, SNe: DES-Dovekie, RSD+BAO: DESI DR1 joint RSD+BAO, $\\txtp$: DES Y3, $\\ITg$: ISW from CMB-galaxy cross-correlations, $\\ITk$: ISW from CMB temperature and CMB lensing cross-correlations. See \\cref{sec:data} for details on the datasets.}\n \\label{tab:musigma}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\section{Results: Interplay of background and perturbation constraints}\\label{sec:background_perts}\n\nIn the previous section, we have looked at how the effects of modified gravity on cosmological perturbations are constrained by various probes of cosmological perturbations. However, there are several ways in which constraints on DE perturbations are also impacted by assumptions and constraints on the background expansion. In this section, we discuss how constraints on DE perturbations are affected by the choice of the background expansion model, by the choice of datasets constraining the background expansion, and by a theoretical prior on $\\cBM$ coming from the physical constraint of gradient stability relating the DE background and perturbations.\n\n\\subsection{Impact of background analysis choices}\\label{sec:background_choices}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{Figures/cmbonly_minimal_bm_w0wa_lcdmbackgroud.pdf}\n \\caption{Comparison of constraints on $\\cBM$ for the minimal dataset combination across $\\lcdm$ and $w_0w_a$ background choices. For the $\\lcdm$ background, we also show the impact of the BAO and SNe datasets by comparing constraints with and without including them. We find that assuming a simpler $\\lcdm$ expansion history weakens the constraints on $\\cBM$ and moves the posterior further away from the GR limit. We also find that removing BAO and SNe datasets makes the $\\cBM$ consistent with the GR limit within 95\\% when a $\\lcdm$ background is assumed.}\n \\label{fig:cmbonly_minimal_bm_w0wa_lcdmbackground}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{Figures/minimal_rsd_isw_bm_lcdmbackground.pdf}\n \\caption{Comparison of constraints on $\\cBM$ for the minimal+RSD+$\\ITg$ dataset combination across $\\lcdm$ and $w_0w_a$ background choices. We find that assuming a simpler $\\lcdm$ expansion history changes the shape of the posterior and makes $\\cBM$ consistent with the GR limit within 95\\%.}\n \\label{fig:minimal_rsd_isw_bm_lcdmbackground}\n\\end{figure}\n\nFrom \\cref{fig:cmbonly_minimal_bm_w0wa_lcdmbackground,fig:minimal_rsd_isw_bm_lcdmbackground}, we see that we get very different posteriors for $\\cBM$ based on the assumed form for the background expansion history. For the minimal dataset combination in \\cref{fig:cmbonly_minimal_bm_w0wa_lcdmbackground}, the surprising feature is that the 68\\% credible region on $\\cBM$ is tighter with the $w_0w_a$ background, despite this model having two extra parameters marginalised over compared to the $\\lcdm$ background.\n\nAnother nontrivial feature in \\cref{fig:cmbonly_minimal_bm_w0wa_lcdmbackground} is the sensitivity of the $\\cBM$ posterior to removing the BAO and SNe datasets. The BAO and SNe datasets are exclusively probes of the background expansion history and have no sensitivity to cosmological perturbations, while $\\cBM$ only affect linear perturbations and have no effect on the expansion history. However, \\cref{fig:cmbonly_minimal_bm_w0wa_lcdmbackground} shows that these datasets strongly affect the posteriors $\\cBM$ even when a $\\lcdm$ expansion history is assumed and there is very little phenomenological freedom in the background expansion. We also see that when using the CMB data on its own, the $\\cBM$ posterior is consistent with GR at 95\\% C.L., but it is not consistent when BAO and SNe data are added. In order to explain this impact of the BAO and SNe data even in a $\\lcdm$ background, we turn to the other cosmological parameters. A notable feature of the combination of datasets used here: Planck PR4 CMB, DESI DR2 BAO, and DES-Dovekie SNe, is the $\\Omega_m$ discrepancy between Planck CMB and DESI BAO \\cite{DESI:2025zgx}. In the context of Parametrized Post-Friedmann (PPF) dynamical DE models, this discrepancy is at the $\\sim 2\\sigma$ level when a $\\lcdm$ background is assumed, but is alleviated in a $w_0w_a$ background. In \\cref{app-Omegam} we confirm the presence of the $\\Omega_m$ discrepancy in our EFTofDE model with a $\\lcdm$ background, and show that there is a noticeable degeneracy between $c_B$ and $\\Omega_m$. This explains why the inclusion of BAO and SNe data has a significant effect on the posterior of $c_B$, and shows that the shift in $\\Omega_m$ between the dataset combinations leads to a shift in $c_B$ impacting its consistency with the GR limit.\n\n\\subsection{The gradient stability prior}\\label{sec:stability_prior}\n\nA feature worth noting in all the posteriors shown in \\crefrange{fig:adding_one_probe}{fig:adding_three_probes} is that the lower left direction of the posteriors, facing the GR limit, is the direction least affected by the choice of likelihoods. For all the likelihood choices considered in \\crefrange{fig:adding_one_probe}{fig:adding_three_probes}, GR remains outside 95\\% C.L. In fact, only we get GR within 95\\% C.L. for only two analysis choices, both of which involve assuming a $\\lcdm$ background: with only the CMB data as shown in \\cref{fig:cmbonly_minimal_bm_w0wa_lcdmbackground}, and with the Minimal + RSD + $\\ITg$ data combination shown in \\cref{fig:minimal_rsd_isw_bm_lcdmbackground}. It appears that in this direction of the parameter space, constraints on DE perturbations are far more sensitive to information about the background expansion than about the perturbations themselves. This indicates that this lower left boundary of the posterior is not determined by the data but by a prior effect coupling the background expansion to the DE perturbations. Since the priors we impose by hand on the dark energy parameters $\\{c_B, c_M, w_0, w_a\\}$ are wide, uninformative, and uncorrelated, this boundary is explained by a theoretical prior which we describe here in detail.\n\nIn the EFTofDE, the linear perturbations of the scalar field are described by a sound speed $c_s$ given by \\cref{cs2}. $c_s^2$ depends nonlinearly on $\\{c_B, c_M, w_0, w_a\\}$ through the time evolutions of $\\alpha_B, \\alpha_M, M^2,$ and $H$. The sound speed squared needs to remain positive, as a negative value represents exponentially growing perturbations which would be catastrophic for predictions of growth of structure. The requirement of positive sound speed at all times is called the gradient stability condition\\footnote{The sound speed squared can in principle be negative for short periods at early times, however this only happens for a very small subregion of the parameter space. Strictly enforcing $c_s^2 > 0$ at all times thus has no significant impact on the posteriors, as checked by e.g. \\cite{Noller:2018wyv}.}. In canonical and k-essence scalar field models (which the EFTofDE reduces to in the limit $(c_B, c_M) = (0, 0)$),\nthe expression \\cref{cs2} reduces to\n\n\\begin{gather}\n c_s^2(z) = \\frac{3(1+w)(1-\\Omega_{DE})}{D}\n\\end{gather}\nwhere redshift dependences are suppressed on the RHS. In this case, a phantom crossing in $(w_0, w_a)$ is not possible as it leads to a violation of either the gradient stability ($c_s^2 \\geq 0$) or non-ghost condition ($D > 0$). In this work, we fixed $\\alpha_K$ to be positive so that the positivity of $D = \\alpha_K + \\frac{3}{2}\\alpha_B^2$ is ensured. Thus, a phantom crossing leads to the gradient instability.\n\nFor a completely fixed expansion history, such as a $\\lcdm$ background, the gradient stability condition is a sharp 1D cutoff in the $\\cBM$ plane, as shown in \\cref{fig:backgroundonly_bm}. However, when $\\wzwa$ are varied parameters that are also constrained by data alongide $\\cBM$, the boundary separating the allowed and forbidden parameter spaces of the gradient stability condition is a 3D surface in the 4D region parameter space of $\\{c_B, c_M, w_0, w_a\\}$\\footnote{Note that \\cref{cs2} also depends on $\\Omega_{m,0}$, which can be considered a dark energy parameter as it is directly related to the background energy density of dark energy as $1 - \\Omega_{DE,0}$. However, it is constrained far more tightly than $\\{c_B, c_M, w_0, w_a\\}$ (despite the $\\Omega_m$ discrepancy discussed in the context of \\cref{fig:Omega_m_discrepancy}) and its variation within its observed posterior has a negligible impact on \\cref{cs2}.}. We are concerned with the effect of this boundary on the observed 2D marginalised posteriors of $\\cBM$. To isolate this effect, we can obtain the posterior on $\\cBM$ with a likelihood combination similar to our minimal setup but without any constraining power on dark energy perturbations. This gives us the projection in the $\\cBM$ plane of the region of the prior boundary that is actually in contact with the observed posteriors of the remaining parameters $\\wzwa$. We achieve this by substituting the CMB and CMB lensing likelihoods in our minimal setup with a compressed prior on the early-universe parameters obtained from chains run with the full CMB likelihoods provided in \\cite{Lemos:2023xhs}.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{Figures/backgroundonly_bm_lcdmline.png}\n \\caption{The posterior on $\\cBM$ obtained with the dataset combination of the early-universe Planck prior, DESI DR2 BAO, and DES-Dovekie SNe. Despite $\\cBM$ having no impact on the expansion history and the dataset combination having no sensitivity to cosmological perturbations, we see a nontrivial posterior shape with a mild disfavouring of the GR limit. This is a result of the theoretical prior of gradient stability arising due to a consistent modelling of the background and perturbations in the EFTofDE, as explained in detail in \\cref{sec:stability_prior}. The constraints on the expansion history from the same dataset combination are shown in \\cref{fig:backgroundonly_w0wa}.}\n \\label{fig:backgroundonly_bm}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\cref{fig:backgroundonly_bm} shows that the observed posteriors for the cosmic expansion history from the CMB, BAO, and SNe data induce a preference for $\\cBM$ away from the GR limit without any constraining power on dark energy perturbations. This is a constraint on $\\cBM$ in a setup where they don't affect any observables; it is the theoretical prior on these parameters which is implicitly applied in our analyses when the gradient stability condition is imposed. We want to emphasise that \"imposing\" gradient stability is not a strong requirement at all; with any analysis that includes information about DE perturbations, the parameter space with $c_s^2 < 0$ is ruled out by data due to exponentially growing perturbations, and it is a matter of semantics\\footnote{Apart from semantics, imposing gradient stability helps speed up parameter inference as points with $c_s^2 < 0$ with exponentially growing perturbations don't play along well with the numerical schemes used in Boltzmann codes.} whether we rule this parameter space out with data or by imposing gradient stability as a prior constraint. Nevertheless, imposing gradient stability as a prior constraint is the more interpretable option as it allows us to quantify the effect of this aspect of the physics of the EFTofDE in the observed posteriors as shown in \\cref{fig:backgroundonly_bm,fig:backgroundonly_w0wa}.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{Figures/minimal_backgroundonly_gr_w0wa.pdf}\n \\caption{Comparison of the constraints on $\\wzwa$ across 1) Our reference case of the minimal dataset combination and the assumption of the EFTofDE model, 2) replacing the full CMB anisotropy and lensing likelihoods in the reference case with the Planck early-universe prior, which removes all sensitivity to linear perturbations in the dataset combination and makes it only sensitive to the background expansion, 3) Changing the model in our reference case from EFTofDE to the standard $w_0w_a$CDM which uses the PPF formalism to allow for phantom crossing and neglects subhorizon DE perturbations.}\n \\label{fig:backgroundonly_w0wa}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\textwidth]{Figures/minimal_gr_bm_w0wa.png}\n \\caption{Joint posterior of $\\{c_B, c_M, w_0, w_a\\}$ for the EFTofDE model, and $\\wzwa$ for $w_0w_a$CDM from our minimal dataset combination. The grey dotted lines represent the $\\lcdm$ limits of the parameters, the yellow dashed line represents the MAP point for $w_0w_a$CDM, and the blue solid line represents the MAP point for EFTofDE. For the significance of deviation from $\\lcdm$, on using the $\\Delta\\chi^2_{MAP}$ values at the MAP points for each model shown here and the number of extra degrees of freedom over $\\lcdm$ (2 for $w_0w_a$CDM and 4 for EFTofDE), we get a 3.1$\\sigma$ deviation for $w_0w_a$CDM and 2.9$\\sigma$ deviation for EFTofDE.}\n \n \\label{fig:minimal_rsd_isw_3x2pt_bm_w0wa}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\nWe now ask the converse question of how constraints on the background expansion parameters $\\wzwa$ are impacted by assumptions about DE perturbations. \\cref{fig:backgroundonly_w0wa} shows the impact of the choice of model of DE perturbations on expansion history constraints. We compare the posteriors on $\\wzwa$ in the EFTofDE model using the minimal combination with posteriors obtained with the same data combination in the standard so-called $w_0w_a$CDM model of dynamical DE, where subhorizon perturbations of DE are neglected and superhorizon perturbations are modelled with the Parametrised Post-Friedmann (PPF) approach \\cite{Hu:2007pj,Fang:2008sn}. In the $w_0w_a$CDM model, gravity is described by GR. We find that a consistent modelling of subhorizon perturbations as employed by the EFTofDE brings the $\\wzwa$ posteriors closer to $\\lcdm$. As can be seen from \\cref{fig:backgroundonly_bm,} the gradient stability prior prefers higher $\\cBM$ values when the $\\wzwa$ posterior is obtained with the early-universe CMB prior\\footnote{This posterior was obtained for the EFTofDE model, but it is identical for the $w_0w_a$CDM model as this dataset combination is completely insensitive to DE perturbations.} This $\\wzwa$ posterior is shown in \\cref{fig:backgroundonly_w0wa}, which is the $\\wzwa$ projection of the same joint posterior that is projected in $\\cBM$ in \\cref{fig:backgroundonly_bm}. However, our probes of perturbations all constrain $\\cBM$ to $\\mathcal{O}(1)$ and disfavour large values. Through the gradient stability constraint on the joint space of $\\{c_B, c_M, w_0, w_a\\}$, the effect of this in the $\\wzwa$ space is to disfavour large deviations from $\\lcdm$, thus pulling the posterior closer to the $\\lcdm$ expansion history.\n\n\\subsection{Assessing the significance of deviation away from $\\lcdm$}\n\nDynamical dark energy modelled as $w_0w_a$CDM is known to deviate from $\\Lambda$CDM at $\\sim 3\\sigma$ with the combination of Planck CMB, DESI DR2 BAO, and DES-Dovekie SNe observations at the time of this work \\cite{DES:2025sig,Hoyt:2026fve}. It is interesting to ask whether a fundamentally consistent modelling of linear perturbations as done in the EFTofDE changes this significance of deviation \\cite{Chudaykin:2024gol,Chudaykin:2025gdn,Lu:2025sjg}: a naive expectation would be a decrease in the significance, if the extra parameters $\\cBM$ introduced in the EFTofDE had no effect on the $\\wzwa$ posteriors and remained consistent with their GR limits. But that is not what we find: as demonstrated earlier in this section, the coupling between the background and perturbations due to the gradient stability condition shifts the background constraints towards the $\\Lambda$CDM limit while shifting the perturbation constraints away from this limit. The impact of these competing effects on the significance of deviation from $\\lcdm$ is not obvious and we do an explicit calculation to find the actual result.\n\nThere are minor variations in frequentist vs. Bayesian interpretations and dataset choices for CMB lensing in the literature. We perform this calculation for $w_0w_a$CDM for Planck PR4 lensing as the CMB lensing dataset (since this is what we use in our minimal dataset combination of CMB+BAO+SNe), and the deviation measure $\\Delta\\chi^2_{MAP}$, as used by the DESI collaboration\\cite{DESI:2025zgx}. $\\Delta\\chi^2_{MAP}$ compares the values of $-2 \\times$ the logarithm of the maximum a posteriori (MAP) points after an extra step of dividing the posterior by the prior volume added by uniform priors in the more complex model. This procedure retains the information in the MAP about any non-uniform priors (e.g. those for some CMB nuisance parameters) while removing penalties from arbitrary prior widths \\cite{DESI:2025fii}.\n\n\nWe then compute the significance of deviation of the EFTofDE model from $\\Lambda$CDM for the minimal dataset combination from the $\\Delta\\chi^2_{MAP}$ value between the EFTofDE and $\\lcdm$ models by applying Wilk's theorem \\cite{Wilks:1938dza}. The significance of deviation computed this way depends only on the value of $\\Delta\\chi^2_{MAP}$ and the number of extra degrees of freedom in the model compared to $\\lcdm$. We show the significances for $w_0w_a$CDM and EFTofDE in \\cref{tab:sigmadeviation}. We find that modelling DE perturbations with the EFTofDE results in only a very minor change in the deviation from $\\lcdm$: 2.9$\\sigma$ compared to 3.1$\\sigma$ for $w_0w_a$CDM. This result is similar to the one found in \\cite{Chudaykin:2024gol,Chudaykin:2025gdn,Lu:2025sjg} for a different combination of CMB+BAO+SNe datasets. It is quite nontrivial that the significance varies little between the two models: for example, the naive expectation from \\cref{fig:backgroundonly_w0wa} would be lower significance of deviation for EFTofDE since the $\\wzwa$ posterior moves closer to $\\lcdm$ in EFTofDE, whereas the naive expectation from \\crefrange{fig:adding_one_probe}{fig:adding_three_probes} would be a higher significance of deviation in EFTofDE since the $\\cBM$ posteriors exclude $\\lcdm$ at over 95\\%. Ultimately, the lack of change is due to a compensation between several competing effects as we see in \\cref{fig:minimal_rsd_isw_3x2pt_bm_w0wa} and \\cref{tab:sigmadeviation}: 1) the posterior of $\\wzwa$ being closer to the $\\lcdm$ limit in EFTofDE than in $w_0w_a$CDM, 2) the posterior of $\\cBM$ being away from their $\\lcdm$ limit at more than 95\\%, 3) the different extra degrees of freedom over $\\lcdm$ in the two models (4 in EFTofDE and 2 in $w_0w_a$CDM), and 4) the difference in the maximum a posteriori values $\\Delta\\chi^2_{MAP}$ in the two models (-15.80 in EFTofDE and -12.57 in $w_0w_a$CDM).\n\n\\begin{table}[]\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.5}\n \\centering\n \\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}\n \\hline\n % \\multirow{2}{*}{Model} & $\\Delta\\chi^2_{MAP}$ & \\#dof & Significance \\\\\n \\multirow{1}{*}{Model} & $\\Delta\\chi^2_{MAP}$ & \\#dof & Significance \\\\\n % & & & \\\\\n \\hhline{|=|=|=|=|}\n $w_0w_a$CDM & -12.57 & 2 & 3.1$\\sigma$ \\\\\n \\hline\n EFTofDE & -15.80 & 4 & 2.9$\\sigma$ \\\\\n \\hline\n \\end{tabular}\n \\caption{Comparison of the significances of deviation from $\\lcdm$ for the $w_0w_a$CDM and EFTofDE models.}\n \\label{tab:sigmadeviation}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\section{Conclusions} \\label{sec:conclusions}\n%\nIn this work, we simultaneously constrain the cosmic expansion history and linear cosmological perturbations in the EFTofDE framework of dynamical dark energy and modified gravity, using multiple probes of cosmic structure: redshift space distortions, weak gravitational lensing, and the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, alongside state-of-the-art probes of cosmic expansion: CMB anisotropies and lensing, baryon acoustic oscillations, and Type IA supernovae. The vast suite of complementary datasets employed here allows us to understand the constraining power of each individual probe of structure in the EFTofDE parameter space comprising of $\\cBM$ and interpret it physically with the help of the phenomenological functions $\\{\\mu(z), \\Sigma(z)\\}$. It also allows us to understand how consistent modelling at the Lagrangian level in the EFTofDE couples the posteriors of the background expansion $\\wzwa$ and cosmological perturbations $\\cBM$ through a theoretical prior coming from the requirement of positive sound speed or gradient stability. Our key findings are as follows:\n\n\\begin{itemize}\n\n\\item The minimal combination of probes that provides meaningful constraints on both the background expansion and perturbations in the EFTofDE consists of CMB anisotropies, CMB lensing, BAO and SNe. We improve the constraints on the DE perturbations described by the parameters $\\cBM$ by supplementing this setup with various combinations of four probes of late-time cosmic structure: redshift space distortions, weak gravitational lensing measured through $\\txtp$ correlations, and the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect measured through correlations of CMB temperature anisotropies with either galaxy number counts or CMB lensing. We explain our cautious approach of ensuring that covariances between probes are not neglected when they are expected to be present in \\cref{sec:likelihood_combinations}. When considering each probe individually, in \\cref{sec:adding_one_probe} we demonstrate their complementary by finding that that RSDs which solely probe clustering and are agnostic to lensing improve constraints on $c_M$, while $\\txtp$, $\\ITg$, and $\\ITk$ which are stronger probes of lensing but weaker probes of clustering give stronger improvements on $c_B$, constraining a complementary direction in the parameter space.\n\n\\item We then combine multiple probes of structure with our minimal setup of CMB+BAO+SNe and demonstrate that combining complementary probes gives significant improvements in the constraints on $\\cBM$ as shown in the posteriors in \\cref{sec:multiprobe_constraints} and quantified by the Figure of Merit values in \\cref{tab:eft_constraints}. Our most constraining probe combination where we can still ensure that there are no appreciable unmodelled covariances consists of the minimal setup of CMB+BAO+SNe supplemented with DESI DR1 RSD, DES Y3 $\\txtp$, and ISW cross-correlations of Planck temperature anisotropies with galaxy number counts from photometric survey catalogs \\cite{Stolzner:2017ged,Seraille:2024beb}. The strong constraints on the EFTofDE perturbations and complementarity of each constituent probe is demonstrated in \\cref{fig:adding_three_probes}.\n\n\\item We understand the phenomenological implications of the constraints on $\\cBM$ by mapping them to the phenomenological functions $\\{\\mu(z), \\Sigma(z)\\}$ which directly affect the evolution of the gravitational potentials in \\cref{sec:pheno_constraints}. We compute constraints on the present-day values $\\mSt$ derived from each dataset combination, where we see stronger gains in FoM values compared to those seen for $\\cBM$ which is due to $\\mSt$ having a more direct connection to observables. We also understand how the evolution of these functions over cosmic history is constrained by plotting $\\{\\mu(z), \\Sigma(z)\\}$ curves from samples that are within the 95\\% posterior in the minimal dataset combination but are disfavoured by each new probe: RSD, $\\txtp$, $\\ITg$. From this, we conclude that RSD observations disfavour a large enhancement in the clustering of matter in the past, $\\txtp$ observations similarly disfavour a large enhancement in lensing, and $\\ITg$ measurements place constraints on the precise rate of decay of the Weyl potential $\\Phi+\\Psi$ at low redshifts $z\\ \\lsim\\ 0.5$.\n\n\\item We demonstrate multiple ways in which constraints on the expansion history $\\wzwa$ and perturbations $\\cBM$ affect each other. First, in \\cref{sec:background_choices} we show that switching the model for the background expansion history from $w_0w_a$ to a $\\lcdm$-like expansion history ($w=-1$) has a substantial effect on the posteriors of $\\cBM$, and surprisingly, for our minimal dataset combination, the constraints on $\\cBM$ are weaker for the $\\lcdm$ expansion history which has fewer phenomenological freedom in the background.\n\n\\item We show that the region of the $\\cBM$ posterior close to the GR limit is affected not just by the constraining power of the data but also by the theoretical prior of gradient stability, which restricts the possible values of $\\{c_B, c_M, w_0, w_a\\}$ in the joint 4D parameter space. We quantify the effect of this prior on the posteriors of $\\cBM$ conditional on the observed posteriors of $\\wzwa$ by using the background-only dataset combination of the Planck early universe prior, BAO and SNe -- we find that in this setup where the entire posterior of $\\cBM$ results from the gradient stability prior, the GR limit is disfavoured at more than 95\\%. This is due to the observed expansion history deviating from a $\\lcdm$ background, which forces $\\cBM$ to be away from the GR limit.\n\n\\item Finally, we show how the observational question of the preference of dynamical DE over $\\lcdm$ is affected by consistently modelling both the DE background and perturbations at the Lagrangian level in the EFTofDE, compared to the standard $w_0w_a$CDM formalism where phantom crossing values of $\\wzwa$ are enables by ignoring subhorizon DE perturbations via the PPF formalism. We find the nontrivial result that the significance of deviation from $\\lcdm$ for the more complex model changes only a little: 2.9$\\sigma$ for EFTofDE compared to 3.1$\\sigma$ for $w_0w_a$CDM.\n\n\\end{itemize}\n\nThere are multiple natural directions for extending this work. Firstly, given the constraining power and complementarity of various LSS probes demonstrated in \\cref{sec:combining_probes_constraints}, it is natural to work towards incorporating more measurements of various properties of LSS. Several combinations of LSS probes/datasets which are different from ours have been recently used in the literature to constrain the EFTofDE: for instance, KiDS-Legacy cosmic shear \\cite{Stolzner:2025vet}; full-shape galaxy clustering from BOSS measured using EFTofLSS \\cite{DAmico:2022osl} and photometric galaxies from the DESI Legacy Imaging Survey \\cite{Zhou:2023gji} which were combined in \\cite{Lu:2025gki,Lu:2025sjg}; and measurements of the decay rate of the Weyl potential \\cite{Dong:2024vxo}, the lensing-inferred growth amplitude, and the growth rate from both DESI clustering and peculiar velocities, which were combined in \\cite{Li:2026sbr}. Given this vast array of LSS probes now available, it is worthwhile to look for the optimal combination of these probes that avoids neglecting cross-probe covariances where they are expected to be present. On similar lines, it is also worthwhile to actually model the cross-probe correlations -- for instance, this has been done by \\cite{Reeves:2025xau} where they modelled the cross-correlations between ACT DR6 CMB lensing \\cite{AtacamaCosmologyTelescope:2025blo}, DESI photometric galaxies and Planck ISW, and by \\cite{Lu:2025sjg} where they modelled the cross-correlations between Planck temperature and DESI photometric galaxies.\n\nSecondly, on the theoretical front, it is important to constrain other EFTofDE models apart from the one we consider here, particularly models which have stronger fundamental motivations such as avoidance of instabilities in the presence of a gravitational wave background \\cite{Creminelli:2019kjy}, or shift symmetry \\cite{Pirtskhalava:2015nla,Traykova:2021hbr}. These models have been constrained in e.g. \\cite{Noller:2020afd,Traykova:2021hbr,Shah:2025vnt}. Developing complementary priors is a further promising direction here, e.g. motivated by requiring radiative stability \\cite{Noller:2018eht,Heisenberg:2020cyi}, somewhat related to the shift symmetry requirement discussed above, or from so-called positivity bounds on the underlying theory space, which arise as a consequence of demanding a sensible UV completion -- see \\cite{Melville:2019wyy,Kennedy:2020ehn,deRham:2021fpu,Melville:2022ykg,deBoe:2024gpf} and references therein for how this can impact cosmological parameter constraints. Local solar system constraints and their interplay with comsology also play an important role here \\cite{Babichev:2011iz,Burrage:2020jkj,Noller:2020lav}.\n\nFinally, several LSS measurements also probe mildly nonlinear scales, which have the potential to considerably improve EFTofDE constraints as well as uncover new phenomenological degrees of freedom at higher orders in the EFTofDE Lagrangian. Making use of nonlinear scales requires development of novel theoretical predictions for the EFTofDE on nonlinear scales \\cite{Kimura:2011dc,Takushima:2015iha,Cusin:2017mzw,Cusin:2017wjg,Amendola:2025xka,Sirera:2026klo} -- also see \\cite{Thomas:2020duj,Srinivasan:2021gib,Fiorini:2022srj,Brando:2022gvg,Bose:2022vwi} for related approaches -- as well as incorporating these models in simulations \\cite{Wright:2022krq,Brando:2023fzu,Ganjoo:2026ugf} so that analysis pipelines can be constructed.\n\n\n\n\n\\begingroup\n\\renewcommand{\\addcontentsline}[3]{}\n\n\\section*{Acknowledgments}\n\\vspace{-0.1in}\n\\noindent \n%\nWe thank Seshadri Nadathur for insightful discussions. NS is supported by an UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) studentship (ST/X508688/1) and funding from the University of Portsmouth and University College London. KK is supported by STFC grant number ST/B001175/1. JN is supported by an STFC Ernest Rutherford Fellowship (ST/S004572/1). LY is supported by the National Key R $\\&$ D Program of China (2023YFA1607800, 2023YFA1607803), NSFC grant 12525301, by the CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research (No. YSBR-092), and by the Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC) and the University of Portsmouth.\n%\n%\nIn deriving the results of this work, we have used the following codes: hi\\_class \\cite{Zumalacarregui:2016pph,Bellini:2019syt}, Cobaya \\cite{Torrado:2020dgo}, and GetDist \\cite{Lewis:2019xzd}. We have made use of the SCIAMA HPC cluster at the Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, University of Portsmouth, as well as the UCL Myriad High Performance Computing Facility (Myriad@UCL), and associated support services, in the completion of this work. For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this work.\n\\\\\n\n\\noindent{\\bf Data availability} Supporting research data are available on reasonable request from the authors.\n\n\\endgroup\n\n\n%\\clearpage\n%%%%%%%%\n\\appendix\n\n\\crefalias{section}{appendix}\n\n\\section{Further checks of the island in the $\\ITg$ posteriors}\\label{app-ISW}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{Figures/minimal_isw_3x2pt_bm_withisland_comparison.pdf}\n \\caption{The posteriors on $\\cBM$ for two dataset combinations including the $\\ITg$ likelihood, which contain a small island within the 95\\% region with large values of $\\cBM$, separate from the main posterior peak. In \\cref{fig:minimal_isw_island_predictions} we verify that despite the large $\\cBM$ values in the island, the physical predictions for ISW cross-correlations in this part of the parameter space are reasonable.}\n \\label{fig:withisland_comparison}\n\\end{figure}\n\nWhen using the $\\ITg$ likelihood, for two specific dataset combinations our posteriors contain an island in the 95\\% credible region, which shows up as a small second peak at much higher values of $\\cBM$ as shown in \\cref{fig:withisland_comparison}\\footnote{We have sufficient convergence in the chains and have checked the numerical accuracy of our newly-implemented $\\ITg$ and $\\txtp$ likelihoods by comparing them with previous implementations in \\cite{Shah:2025vnt,Wang:2024uvw}. This rules out unphysical causes for the island.}. This island is removed when RSD data is added to either of these data combinations. We confirm in \\cref{fig:minimal_isw_island_predictions} that the physical predictions for the galaxy-CMB cross-correlations in this part of the parameter space are quite reasonable despite the unusually high values of $\\cBM$.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{Figures/isw_island_predictions.pdf}\n \\caption{The ISW predictions for the island in the $\\ITg$ posteriors shown in \\cref{fig:withisland_comparison} in lowest redshift bin of the SDSS survey, with observations fron $z=0.1-0.3$. These predictions are calculated from samples from the chains which lie in the island. This plot shows that these points give reasonable physical predictions for ISW cross-correlations and fit the ISW signal in this bin comparably well as the Planck 2018 $\\lcdm$ model.}\n \\label{fig:minimal_isw_island_predictions}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\section{Impact of the $\\Omega_m$ degeneracy}\\label{app-Omegam}\n\n\\begin{figure}[htp!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{Figures/cmbonly_minimal_bm_Omegam_lcdmbackground.pdf}\n \\caption{Comparison of posteriors on $\\cBM$ and their joint posteriors with $\\Omega_m$ assuming a $\\lcdm$ expansion history with and without the addition of DESI DR2 BAO and DES Dovekie SNe datasets to Planck PR4 anisotropies and lensing. This plot demonstrates a negative degeneracy between $c_B$ and $\\Omega_m$. This degeneracy combined with the difference in the inferred $\\Omega_m$ values due to the impact of BAO and SNe datasets is responsible for the deviation from GR in $\\cBM$ seen in the CMB+BAO+SNe dataset combination.}\n \\label{fig:Omega_m_discrepancy}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\cref{fig:Omega_m_discrepancy} shows that adding the BAO and SNe data to the CMB data significantly lowers the mean of the inferred $\\Omega_m$ when a $\\lcdm$ background is assumed. The underlying cause of this, as mentioned in \\cref{sec:background_choices}, is the mild discrepancy in the values of $\\Omega_m$ inferred in a $\\lcdm$ model between the CMB and recent DESI BAO measurements \\cite{DESI:2025zgx}. Due to the degeneracy between $c_B$ and $\\Omega_m$ seen in their 2D posterior, this $\\Omega_m$ discrepancy also increases the posterior mean of the inferred $c_B$, moving it away from the GR limit.\n\n\\bibliographystyle{utphys}\n\\bibliography{DESI_RSD_EFT}\n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: aas_macros.sty\n================================================\n%\n% These Macros are taken from the AAS TeX macro package version 5.2\n% and are compatible with the macros in the A&A document class\n% version 7.0\n% Include this file in your LaTeX source only if you are not using\n% the AAS TeX macro package or the A&A document class and need to\n% resolve the macro definitions in the TeX/BibTeX entries returned by\n% the ADS abstract service.\n%\n% If you plan not to use this file to resolve the journal macros\n% rather than the whole AAS TeX macro package, you should save the\n% file as ``aas_macros.sty'' and then include it in your LaTeX paper\n% by using a construct such as:\n% \\documentstyle[11pt,aas_macros]{article}\n%\n% For more information on the AASTeX and A&A packages, please see:\n% http://journals.aas.org/authors/aastex.html \n% ftp://ftp.edpsciences.org/pub/aa/readme.html\n% For more information about ADS abstract server, please see:\n% http://adsabs.harvard.edu/ads_abstracts.html\n%\n\n% Abbreviations for journals. The object here is to provide authors\n% with convenient shorthands for the most \"popular\" (often-cited)\n% journals; the author can use these markup tags without being concerned\n% about the exact form of the journal abbreviation, or its formatting.\n% It is up to the keeper of the macros to make sure the macros expand\n% to the proper text. If macro package writers agree to all use the\n% same TeX command name, authors only have to remember one thing, and\n% the style file will take care of editorial preferences. This also\n% applies when a single journal decides to revamp its abbreviating\n% scheme, as happened with the ApJ (Abt 1991).\n\n\\let\\jnl@style=\\rm\n\\def\\ref@jnl#1{{\\jnl@style#1}}\n\n\\def\\aj{\\ref@jnl{AJ}} % Astronomical Journal\n\\def\\actaa{\\ref@jnl{Acta Astron.}} % Acta Astronomica\n\\def\\araa{\\ref@jnl{ARA\\&A}} % Annual Review of Astron and Astrophys\n\\def\\apj{\\ref@jnl{ApJ}} % Astrophysical Journal\n\\def\\apjl{\\ref@jnl{ApJ}} % Astrophysical Journal, Letters\n\\def\\apjs{\\ref@jnl{ApJS}} % Astrophysical Journal, Supplement\n\\def\\ao{\\ref@jnl{Appl.~Opt.}} % Applied Optics\n\\def\\apss{\\ref@jnl{Ap\\&SS}} % Astrophysics and Space Science\n\\def\\aap{\\ref@jnl{A\\&A}} % Astronomy and Astrophysics\n\\def\\aapr{\\ref@jnl{A\\&A~Rev.}} % Astronomy and Astrophysics Reviews\n\\def\\aaps{\\ref@jnl{A\\&AS}} % Astronomy and Astrophysics, Supplement\n\\def\\azh{\\ref@jnl{AZh}} % Astronomicheskii Zhurnal\n\\def\\baas{\\ref@jnl{BAAS}} % Bulletin of the AAS\n\\def\\bac{\\ref@jnl{Bull. astr. Inst. Czechosl.}}\n % Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia \n\\def\\caa{\\ref@jnl{Chinese Astron. Astrophys.}}\n % Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics\n\\def\\cjaa{\\ref@jnl{Chinese J. Astron. Astrophys.}}\n % Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics\n\\def\\icarus{\\ref@jnl{Icarus}} % Icarus\n\\def\\jcap{\\ref@jnl{J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.}}\n % Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics\n\\def\\jrasc{\\ref@jnl{JRASC}} % Journal of the RAS of Canada\n\\def\\memras{\\ref@jnl{MmRAS}} % Memoirs of the RAS\n\\def\\mnras{\\ref@jnl{MNRAS}} % Monthly Notices of the RAS\n\\def\\na{\\ref@jnl{New A}} % New Astronomy\n\\def\\nar{\\ref@jnl{New A Rev.}} % New Astronomy Review\n\\def\\pra{\\ref@jnl{Phys.~Rev.~A}} % Physical Review A: General Physics\n\\def\\prb{\\ref@jnl{Phys.~Rev.~B}} % Physical Review B: Solid State\n\\def\\prc{\\ref@jnl{Phys.~Rev.~C}} % Physical Review C\n\\def\\prd{\\ref@jnl{Phys.~Rev.~D}} % Physical Review D\n\\def\\pre{\\ref@jnl{Phys.~Rev.~E}} % Physical Review E\n\\def\\prl{\\ref@jnl{Phys.~Rev.~Lett.}} % Physical Review Letters\n\\def\\pasa{\\ref@jnl{PASA}} % Publications of the Astron. Soc. of Australia\n\\def\\pasp{\\ref@jnl{PASP}} % Publications of the ASP\n\\def\\pasj{\\ref@jnl{PASJ}} % Publications of the ASJ\n\\def\\rmxaa{\\ref@jnl{Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis.}}%\n % Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica\n\\def\\qjras{\\ref@jnl{QJRAS}} % Quarterly Journal of the RAS\n\\def\\skytel{\\ref@jnl{S\\&T}} % Sky and Telescope\n\\def\\solphys{\\ref@jnl{Sol.~Phys.}} % Solar Physics\n\\def\\sovast{\\ref@jnl{Soviet~Ast.}} % Soviet Astronomy\n\\def\\ssr{\\ref@jnl{Space~Sci.~Rev.}} % Space Science Reviews\n\\def\\zap{\\ref@jnl{ZAp}} % Zeitschrift fuer Astrophysik\n\\def\\nat{\\ref@jnl{Nature}} % Nature\n\\def\\iaucirc{\\ref@jnl{IAU~Circ.}} % IAU Cirulars\n\\def\\aplett{\\ref@jnl{Astrophys.~Lett.}} % Astrophysics Letters\n\\def\\apspr{\\ref@jnl{Astrophys.~Space~Phys.~Res.}}\n % Astrophysics Space Physics Research\n\\def\\bain{\\ref@jnl{Bull.~Astron.~Inst.~Netherlands}} \n % Bulletin Astronomical Institute of the Netherlands\n\\def\\fcp{\\ref@jnl{Fund.~Cosmic~Phys.}} % Fundamental Cosmic Physics\n\\def\\gca{\\ref@jnl{Geochim.~Cosmochim.~Acta}} % Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta\n\\def\\grl{\\ref@jnl{Geophys.~Res.~Lett.}} % Geophysics Research Letters\n\\def\\jcp{\\ref@jnl{J.~Chem.~Phys.}} % Journal of Chemical Physics\n\\def\\jgr{\\ref@jnl{J.~Geophys.~Res.}} % Journal of Geophysics Research\n\\def\\jqsrt{\\ref@jnl{J.~Quant.~Spec.~Radiat.~Transf.}}\n % Journal of Quantitiative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer\n\\def\\memsai{\\ref@jnl{Mem.~Soc.~Astron.~Italiana}}\n % Mem. Societa Astronomica Italiana\n\\def\\nphysa{\\ref@jnl{Nucl.~Phys.~A}} % Nuclear Physics A\n\\def\\physrep{\\ref@jnl{Phys.~Rep.}} % Physics Reports\n\\def\\physscr{\\ref@jnl{Phys.~Scr}} % Physica Scripta\n\\def\\planss{\\ref@jnl{Planet.~Space~Sci.}} % Planetary Space Science\n\\def\\procspie{\\ref@jnl{Proc.~SPIE}} % Proceedings of the SPIE\n\n\\let\\astap=\\aap\n\\let\\apjlett=\\apjl\n\\let\\apjsupp=\\apjs\n\\let\\applopt=\\ao\n\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091178,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31978"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31978"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Louise Paquereau"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Louise Paquereau, Clotilde Laigle, Henry Joy McCracken, Olivier Ilbert, Hollis B. Akins, Rafael C. Arango-Togo, Nguyen Binh, Caitlin M. Casey, Yohan Dubois, Maximilien Franco, Ghassem Gozaliasl, Santosh Harish, Michaela Hirschmann, Baptiste Jego, Aidan Kaminsky, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Anton Koekemoer, Damien Le Borgne, Joseph S. W. Lewis, Daizhong Liu, Georgios Magdis, Jed McKinney, Wilfried Mercier, Lauro Moscardini, Thibaud Moutard, Jason D. Rhodes, Brant E. Robertson, Sogol Sanjaripour, Marko Shuntov, Greta Toni, Maxime Trebitsch and Laurence Tresse"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"COSMOS-Web: does halo mass alone shape the clustering of star-forming and quiescent galaxies?"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"12 pages, 8 figures. Submitted to A&A"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"astro-ph.GA"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"While stellar mass correlates strongly with halo mass, it remains unclear whether halo mass alone governs galaxy star-formation activity, or whether secondary halo properties and environment also play a role. We investigate these effects beyond halo mass by measuring the auto- and cross-correlations of star-forming and quiescent galaxies in the COSMOS-Web survey from $z = 5$ to the present day. To isolate environmental contributions, we introduce a method that matches the halo mass distributions of both populations using the UniverseMachine model. We find that quiescent galaxies remain more strongly clustered than star-forming systems by at least $0.5-1$ dex at all redshifts, even after controlling for halo mass. At $z \\le 2$, this excess clustering increases towards lower stellar masses, with the most clustered objects being $\\log(M_\\star/{\\rm M}_\\odot) \\le 9.5$ quiescent galaxies. This points to environmental quenching significantly affecting low-mass galaxies at $z \\le 2$, likely driven by ram-pressure stripping or the suppression of cold gas accretion, as these objects show disky morphologies. Cross-correlations further reveal one-halo conformity up to $z \\simeq 2$: low-mass (or satellite) quiescent galaxies are more strongly clustered around massive (or central) quiescent galaxies than around star-forming centrals of the same halo mass. This signal may arise from quenching mechanisms affecting both centrals and satellites, correlated assembly histories prior to infall, or dependencies on secondary halo properties. Both environmental quenching and conformity appear to vanish between $z \\simeq 5$ and $2$. Together, these results challenge the common assumption that clustering and star-formation activity depend solely on halo mass."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:18:25 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:18:25 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Paquereau","Louise",""],["Laigle","Clotilde",""],["McCracken","Henry Joy",""],["Ilbert","Olivier",""],["Akins","Hollis B.",""],["Arango-Togo","Rafael C.",""],["Binh","Nguyen",""],["Casey","Caitlin M.",""],["Dubois","Yohan",""],["Franco","Maximilien",""],["Gozaliasl","Ghassem",""],["Harish","Santosh",""],["Hirschmann","Michaela",""],["Jego","Baptiste",""],["Kaminsky","Aidan",""],["Kartaltepe","Jeyhan S.",""],["Koekemoer","Anton",""],["Borgne","Damien Le",""],["Lewis","Joseph S. W.",""],["Liu","Daizhong",""],["Magdis","Georgios",""],["McKinney","Jed",""],["Mercier","Wilfried",""],["Moscardini","Lauro",""],["Moutard","Thibaud",""],["Rhodes","Jason D.",""],["Robertson","Brant E.",""],["Sanjaripour","Sogol",""],["Shuntov","Marko",""],["Toni","Greta",""],["Trebitsch","Maxime",""],["Tresse","Laurence",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Paquereau\",\n \"Louise\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Laigle\",\n \"Clotilde\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"McCracken\",\n \"Henry Joy\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Ilbert\",\n \"Olivier\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Akins\",\n \"Hollis B.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Arango-Togo\",\n \"Rafael C.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Binh\",\n \"Nguyen\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Casey\",\n \"Caitlin M.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Dubois\",\n \"Yohan\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Franco\",\n \"Maximilien\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Gozaliasl\",\n \"Ghassem\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Harish\",\n \"Santosh\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Hirschmann\",\n \"Michaela\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Jego\",\n \"Baptiste\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Kaminsky\",\n \"Aidan\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Kartaltepe\",\n \"Jeyhan S.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Koekemoer\",\n \"Anton\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Borgne\",\n \"Damien Le\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Lewis\",\n \"Joseph S. W.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Liu\",\n \"Daizhong\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Magdis\",\n \"Georgios\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"McKinney\",\n \"Jed\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Mercier\",\n \"Wilfried\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Moscardini\",\n \"Lauro\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Moutard\",\n \"Thibaud\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Rhodes\",\n \"Jason D.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Robertson\",\n \"Brant E.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Sanjaripour\",\n \"Sogol\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Shuntov\",\n \"Marko\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Toni\",\n \"Greta\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Trebitsch\",\n \"Maxime\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Tresse\",\n \"Laurence\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: aa.cls\n================================================\n%%\n%% This is file `aa.cls',\n%% generated with the docstrip utility.\n%%\n%% The original source files were:\n%%\n%% aa.dtx (with options: `aa')\n%% \n%% aa.dtx\n%% Copyright EDP Sciences (2024), J.-C. Charpentier (2010), all rights reserved.\n%% Class `aa' to use with LaTeX 2e\n%% \\CharacterTable\n%% {Upper-case \\A\\B\\C\\D\\E\\F\\G\\H\\I\\J\\K\\L\\M\\N\\O\\P\\Q\\R\\S\\T\\U\\V\\W\\X\\Y\\Z\n%% Lower-case \\a\\b\\c\\d\\e\\f\\g\\h\\i\\j\\k\\l\\m\\n\\o\\p\\q\\r\\s\\t\\u\\v\\w\\x\\y\\z\n%% Digits \\0\\1\\2\\3\\4\\5\\6\\7\\8\\9\n%% Exclamation \\! Double quote \\\" Hash (number) \\#\n%% Dollar \\$ Percent \\% Ampersand \\&\n%% Acute accent \\' Left paren \\( Right paren \\)\n%% Asterisk \\* Plus \\+ Comma \\,\n%% Minus \\- Point \\. Solidus \\/\n%% Colon \\: Semicolon \\; Less than \\<\n%% Equals \\= Greater than \\> Question mark \\?\n%% Commercial at \\@ Left bracket \\[ Backslash \\\\\n%% Right bracket \\] Circumflex \\^ Underscore \\_\n%% Grave accent \\` Left brace \\{ Vertical bar \\|\n%% Right brace \\} Tilde \\~}\n%%\n\\def\\filedate{2024/08/08}\n\\let\\aafiledate\\filedate\n\\def\\fileversion{9.2}\n\\let\\aafileversion\\fileversion\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1995/06/01]\n\\ProvidesClass{aa}\n [\\filedate{} v\\fileversion{} Class for AA journal]\n\\LoadClass[fleqn]{article}\n\\newif\\ifaa@letter\n\\DeclareOption{letter}{\\aa@lettertrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@onlletter\n\\DeclareOption{onlletter}{\\aa@onllettertrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@online\n\\DeclareOption{online}{\\aa@onlinetrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@referee\n\\DeclareOption{referee}{\\aa@refereetrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@contents\n\\DeclareOption{contents}{\\aa@contentstrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@contentsAut\n\\DeclareOption{contentsAut}{\\aa@contentsAuttrue}\n\\newlength\\aa@fullwidth\n\\newlength\\aa@fullheight\n\\DeclareOption{a4paper}{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@paper{a4paper}%\n \\setlength\\aa@fullwidth{184mm}%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@leftmarginpaper{(21cm-\\aa@fullwidth)/2}%\n \\setlength\\aa@fullheight{705pt}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{letterpaper}{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@paper{letterpaper}\n \\setlength\\aa@fullwidth{184mm}%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@leftmarginpaper{(8.5in-\\aa@fullwidth)/2}%\n \\setlength\\aa@fullheight{705pt-1.76cm}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{legalpaper}{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@paper{legalpaper}%\n \\setlength\\aa@fullwidth{184mm}%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@leftmarginpaper{(8.5in-\\aa@fullwidth)/2}%\n \\setlength\\aa@fullheight{705pt}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@paper{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@leftmarginpaper{}\n\\newif\\ifaa@twocolumn\n\\DeclareOption{onecolumn}{%\n \\aa@twocolumnfalse\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@column{onecolumn}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{twocolumn}{%\n \\aa@twocolumntrue\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@column{twocolumn}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@column{}\n\\newif\\if@wideboxfn\n\\@wideboxfnfalse\n\\DeclareOption{wideboxfn}{\\@wideboxfntrue}\n%\n\\newif\\ifaa@longfn\n\\DeclareOption{longfn}{\\aa@longfntrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@longauth\n\\DeclareOption{longauth}{\\aa@longauthtrue}\n\\let\\if@myobjects\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{ascii}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[ascii]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{latin1}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[latin1]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{latin9}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[latin9]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{ansinews}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[ansinews]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{applemac}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[applemac]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{utf8}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[utf8]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@font{}\n\\DeclareOption{cm}{%\n \\def\\aa@font{%\n \\RequirePackage{textcomp}%\n }%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{showoverfull}{\\setlength\\overfullrule{5\\p@}}\n\\DeclareOption{hideoverfull}{\\setlength\\overfullrule{\\z@}}\n\\DeclareOption{openbib}{%\n \\AtEndOfPackage{%\n \\renewcommand\\@openbib@code{%\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\bibindent\n \\itemindent -\\bibindent\n \\listparindent \\itemindent\n \\parsep \\z@\n }%\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\par}}%\n}\n\\newif\\ifaa@bibnumber\n\\DeclareOption{bibnumber}{\\aa@bibnumbertrue%\n \\def\\aa@biblio{%\n \\RequirePackage[sort&compress]{natbib}\n \\bibpunct{[}{]}{,}{n}{}{,}%\n \\def\\@biblabel##1{##1.}%\n \\bibliographystyle{plainnat}%\n \\def\\bibfont{\\aa@bibliographyfont}%\n \\setlength{\\bibsep}{\\z@}%\n }\n}\n\\DeclareOption{bibauthoryear}{%\n \\def\\aa@biblio{%\n \\RequirePackage[nonamebreak]{natbib}\n \\bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}%\n \\def\\bibfont{\\aa@bibliographyfont}%\n \\setlength{\\bibsep}{\\z@}%\n }%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{bibyear}{%\n \\def\\aa@biblio{%\n \\def\\@biblabel##1{}%\n \\def\\@cite##1##2{{##1\\if@tempswa , ##2\\fi}}%\n }\n}\n\\ExecuteOptions{a4paper,twocolumn,utf8,hideoverfull,bibauthoryear}\n\\ProcessOptions\n\\RequirePackage{calc}\n\\RequirePackage{etex}\n\\RequirePackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\\aa@inputenc\n\\aa@font\n\\ifaa@referee\n\\RequirePackage{xcolor}\n\\RequirePackage{marginnote}\n\\AtEndOfClass{\n\\setlength{\\marginparwidth}{50mm}\n\\setlength{\\marginparsep}{5mm}\n}\n%\n\\newcounter{lenote}\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n\\@ifpackageloaded{hyperref}%\n{\\newcommand{\\LEm}[1]{\\texorpdfstring{\\protect\\stepcounter{lenote}{\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}] }}\n\\protect\\marginnote{\\baselineskip3ex{\\normalsize{\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}: #1]}}}}}{}}\n\\newcommand{\\LEt}[1]{\\texorpdfstring{\\protect\\stepcounter{lenote}{\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}: #1] }}}{}}}%\n{\\newcommand{\\LEm}[1]{\\protect\\stepcounter{lenote}{\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}] }}\n\\protect\\marginnote{\\baselineskip3ex{\\normalsize{\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}: #1]}}}}}\n\\newcommand{\\LEt}[1]{\\protect\\stepcounter{lenote}{\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}: #1] }}}}%\n}\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@column{onecolumn}\n \\aa@twocolumnfalse\n \\setlength{\\aa@fullwidth}{0.75\\aa@fullwidth}\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@leftmarginpaper{15mm}\n \\if!\\csname appendix\\endcsname!\\AtEndDocument{\\listofobjects}\\fi\n\\fi\n\\ifx\\pdfoutput\\undefined\n \\newcount\\pdfoutput\n\\fi\n\\ifnum\\pdfoutput=\\z@\n \\newcommand\\aa@driver{dvips}\n\\else\n \\newcommand\\aa@driver{pdftex}\n\\fi\n\\RequirePackage[\\aa@driver, \\aa@paper, left=\\aa@leftmarginpaper,\n \\ifaa@twocolumn\\aa@column\\fi, \\ifaa@referee\\else twoside,\\fi\n textheight=\\aa@fullheight,headheight=12pt,headsep=12pt,\n footskip=20pt,\n textwidth=\\aa@fullwidth, columnsep=4mm,\n marginpar=0in, marginparsep=0in]{geometry}\n\\RequirePackage{setspace}\n\\ifaa@referee\n \\doublespacing\n\\fi\n\\RequirePackage{fancyhdr}\n\\RequirePackage{cuted}\n\\RequirePackage[tbtags,fleqn]{amsmath}\n\\RequirePackage{amssymb}\n\\setlength{\\mathindent}{\\z@}\n\\ifaa@letter\n \\RequirePackage{xcolor}\n\\fi\n\\RequirePackage{url, enumerate}\n\\RequirePackage{longtable}\n\\renewcommand*\\LT@makecaption[3]{%\n \\LT@mcol\\LT@cols\n c{\\hbox to\\z@{%\n \\hss\\parbox[t]\\LTcapwidth{%\n \\aa@longtablecaptionfont\n \\sbox\\@tempboxa{%\n #1{{\\aa@longtableheadcaptionfont#2.} }#3%\n }%\n \\ifdim\\wd\\@tempboxa>\\hsize\n #1{{\\aa@longtableheadcaptionfont#2.} }#3%\n \\else\n \\hbox to\\hsize{\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n \\fi\n \\endgraf\\vskip\\baselineskip\n }%\n \\hss\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\aa@biblio\n\\RequirePackage{xspace}\n\\RequirePackage[english]{babel}\n\\def\\aatolm#1{\\gdef\\@aatolm{#1}}\n\\def\\@aatolm{}\n\\renewenvironment{appendix}{\\par\\clearpage\\aatolm{1}\n\\def\\@hangfrom##1{\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{{##1}}%\n \\hangindent \\parindent\\noindent\\box\\@tempboxa}\n\\def\\sectcounterend{:}\n\\def\\@seccntformat##1{\\csname theap##1\\endcsname%\n \\hskip\\betweenumberspace}\n \\setcounter{section}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{figure}{0}%\n \\setcounter{table}{0}%\n \\newcommand\\theapsection{\\appendixname\\ \\@Alph\\c@section\\sectcounterend}%\n \\newcommand\\theapsubsection{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\@arabic\\c@subsection.}%\n \\newcommand\\theapsubsubsection{\\theapsubsection\\@arabic\\c@subsubsection.}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesection{\\@Alph\\c@section}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesubsection{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\@arabic\\c@subsection}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesubsubsection{\\thesubsection.\\@arabic\\c@subsubsection}%\n \\renewcommand\\theequation{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\@arabic\\c@equation}%\n \\renewcommand\\thefigure{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\@arabic\\c@figure}%\n \\renewcommand\\thetable{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\@arabic\\c@table}%\n \\@addtoreset{equation}{section}%\n \\@addtoreset{figure}{section}%\n \\@addtoreset{table}{section}}\n{\n \\setcounter{section}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{figure}{0}%\n \\setcounter{table}{0}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesection{\\@arabic\\c@section}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesubsection{\\@arabic\\c@subsection}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesubsubsection{\\@arabic\\c@subsubsection}%\n \\renewcommand\\theequation{\\@arabic\\c@equation}%\n \\renewcommand\\thefigure{\\@arabic\\c@figure}%\n \\renewcommand\\thetable{\\@arabic\\c@table}%\n}\n\\RequirePackage[figuresright]{rotating}\n\\newcount\\aa@cnta\n\\newcount\\aa@cntb\n\\newcount\\aa@nbwords\n\\newcount\\aa@nbauthors\n\\newcount\\aa@nbinstitutes\n\\newcommand*\\aa@traditabstractmax{300}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@structabstractmax{300}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywordsmax{6}\n\\newcounter{aa@institutecnt}\n\\newcount\\aa@savecounter\n\\newlength{\\aa@dima}\n\\newlength{\\aa@dimb}\n\\newlength{\\aa@dimc}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@removefootnoteindentspace{-1.5em}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@removefootnotewbindentspace{-2.25em}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logoruleindent{8\\p@}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logoruleraise{4\\p@}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logorulelength{78\\p@}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logorulethick{1\\p@}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logoraise{25\\p@}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logoraiserest{14.5\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTheorem}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTheorem}{8\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceAfterTheorem}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceAfterTheorem}{8\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\HSpaceIndentTheorem}\n\\setlength{\\HSpaceIndentTheorem}{\\z@}\n\\newlength{\\HVSpaceSepTheorem}\n\\setlength{\\HVSpaceSepTheorem}{0.25em}\n\\newlength{\\aa@securityheadmargin}\n\\setlength{\\aa@securityheadmargin}{2cm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@bleedmargin}\n\\setlength{\\aa@bleedmargin}{5mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@voffsetlettername}\n\\setlength{\\aa@voffsetlettername}{2.55cm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@hoffsetlettername}\n\\setlength{\\aa@hoffsetlettername}{2mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@hoffsetgray}\n\\setlength{\\aa@hoffsetgray}{3mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftercontentsnameskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftercontentsnameskip}{12\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftercontentsAutnameskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftercontentsAutnameskip}{12\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforeheadboxskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforeheadboxskip}{-20\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterheadboxskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterheadboxskip}{49\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforetopicsskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforetopicsskip}{18\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftertopicsskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftertopicsskip}{32\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterletternameskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterletternameskip}{6mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforeletternameskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforeletternameskip}{-4.8mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforeheadnoteskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforeheadnoteskip}{-12\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterheadnoteskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterheadnoteskip}{3.5mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftertitleskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftertitleskip}{10\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforesubtitleskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforesubtitleskip}{7\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftersubtitleskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftersubtitleskip}{10\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterauthorskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterauthorskip}{16.5\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforedefaultheadnoteskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforedefaultheadnoteskip}{2pt}\n\\newlength{\\aa@headingleftmargin}\n\\setlength{\\aa@headingleftmargin}{8mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@headingrightmargin}\n\\setlength{\\aa@headingrightmargin}{8mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterinstituteskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterinstituteskip}{8\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@instituteindent}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterdateskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterdateskip}{16.5\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterdedicationskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterdedicationskip}{16.5\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterabstractnameskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterabstractnameskip}{9\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterabstractskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterabstractskip}{6\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}{\\z@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterkeywordsskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterkeywordsskip}{24\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforeacknowledgementsskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforeacknowledgementsskip}{6pt}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afteracknowledgementsskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afteracknowledgementsskip}{6pt}\n\\newlength{\\aa@figgap}\n\\setlength{\\aa@figgap}{12pt}\n\\newlength{\\aa@sidecaptionminwidth}\n\\setlength{\\aa@sidecaptionminwidth}{5cm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@sidecaptionwidth}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceBeforeFigCaption}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceBeforeFigCaption}{5pt}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceAfterTabCaption}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceAfterTabCaption}{10pt}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTabBib}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTabBib}{2ex}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTabFoot}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTabFoot}{2ex}\n\\newlength{\\aftertext}\n\\setlength{\\aftertext}{5pt}\n\\newlength{\\aa@entryboxwidth}\n\\setlength{\\aa@entryboxwidth}{8mm}\n\\newlength{\\betweenumberspace}\n\\setlength{\\betweenumberspace}{3.33pt}\n\\newif\\ifaa@structabstract\n\\newif\\ifaa@numberedtheorem\n\\newif\\ifaa@firstonline\n\\aa@firstonlinetrue\n\\newcommand*\\journalname[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@journalname{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@journalname{Astronomy \\& Astrophysics}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@manuscriptname{%\n manuscript no. \\jobname\n \\hspace{\\stretch{1}}%\n \\copyright ESO \\the\\year\n}\n\\def\\Num{1}\n\\def\\Vol{1}\n\\def\\Month{JANUARY~I}\n\\newcommand*\\AANum[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@numarticle{#1}%\n\\gdef\\@AANum{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\@AANum{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@numarticle{Article number}\n\\newcommand*\\doi[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@doi{DOI: #1}%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@doifig{#1}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@doi{(DOI: will be inserted by hand later)}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@doifig{(to add)}\n\\newcommand*\\AALogo{%\n \\settowidth{\\aa@dima}{\\aa@logo@astrophysicsfont Astrophysics}%\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{%\n \\begin{minipage}{\\aa@dima}\n \\aa@logo@astronomyfont Astronomy\\\\\n \\raisebox{\\aa@logoraise}{%\n \\parbox[c][0pt]{\\z@}{%\n \\rlap{%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@logoruleindent}%\n \\aa@logo@andfont \\&%\n \\rule[\\aa@logoruleraise]{\\aa@logorulelength}{\\aa@logorulethick}%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n \\raisebox{\\aa@logoraiserest}{\\aa@logo@astrophysicsfont Astrophysics}\n \\end{minipage}%\n }%\n \\copy0%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@pageof{, page \\thepage{}}\n\\newcommand*{\\aa@publishlink}{\\hfil%\n Article published by EDP Sciences%\n \\hfil}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@topicsname{Special feature}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@offprintsname{Send offprint requests to\\/}\n\\newcommand*\\listobjectname{List of Objects}\n\\addto\\captionsenglish{\\renewcommand*\\figurename{Fig.}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@figtype{figure}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tabtype{table}\n\\newcommand*\\lettername{Letter to the Editor}\n\\newcommand*\\noteaddname{Note added in proof.}\n\\def\\noteadd{\\par\\addvspace{17pt}\\rm\n\\trivlist\\item[\\hskip\\labelsep\n{\\it\\noteaddname}]}\n\\def\\endnoteadd{\\endtrivlist\\addvspace{6pt}}\n\\newcommand*\\andname{\\unskip, }\n\\newcommand*\\andlastname{\\unskip, and }\n\\newcommand*\\andtwoname{\\unskip\\ and }\n\\newcommand*\\etalname{et al.}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@contentsname{Contents sorted by section}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@contentsAutname{Contents sorted by first author}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@pagename{page}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@AAname{A\\&A}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@copyrightname{\\copyright~ESO}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractiname{Context}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractiiname{Aims}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractiiiname{Methods}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractivname{Results}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractvname{Conclusions}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywordname{Key words}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@acknowledgementsname{Acknowledgements}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@floatcounterend{.~}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablebibname{References}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablefootname{Notes}\n\\renewcommand\\normalsize{%\n \\@setfontsize\\normalsize\\@xpt{11}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 8.55\\p@ \\@plus4\\p@ \\@minus5\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus3\\p@\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 6\\p@ \\@plus3\\p@ \\@minus3\\p@\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\let\\@listi\\@listI}\n\\normalsize\n\\renewcommand\\small{%\n \\@setfontsize\\small\\@ixpt{10}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 8.5\\p@ \\@plus3\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus2\\p@\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 4\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus2\\p@\n \\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\parsep 0\\p@ \\@plus1\\p@ \\@minus1\\p@\n \\topsep 8\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\itemsep0\\p@}%\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n}\n\\let\\footnotesize\\small\n\\renewcommand\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize\\scriptsize\\@viipt\\@viiipt}\n\\renewcommand\\tiny{\\@setfontsize\\tiny\\@viiipt\\@ixpt}\n\\renewcommand\\large{\\@setfontsize\\large\\@xipt{13}}\n\\renewcommand\\Large{\\@setfontsize\\Large\\@xivpt{16}}\n\\renewcommand\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize\\LARGE\\@xviipt{20}}\n\\renewcommand\\huge{\\@setfontsize\\huge\\@xxpt{24}}\n\\renewcommand\\Huge{\\@setfontsize\\Huge\\@xxvpt{30}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@footfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractfont{\\small\\sffamily\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@abstractfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@offprintsnamefont{\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logo@astronomyfont{\\fontsize{18}{21}\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logo@andfont{\\fontsize{16}{12}\\sffamily\\mdseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logo@astrophysicsfont{\\fontsize{18}{21}\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@letternamefont{\\sffamily\\fontsize{19.2\\p@}{21\\p@}\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headletternamefont{\\large\\scshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@contentsnamefont{\\Large\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@contentsAutnamefont{\\Large\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@journalnamefont{\\slshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@manuscriptnamefont{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@todayheadboxfont{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@msnrheadboxfont{\\LARGE\\bfseries\\smash}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@textidlineempty{{\\slshape A\\&A proofs:}\\ manuscript no.~\\jobname}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@idlinefont{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@doifont{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@copyrightfont{\\small}\n\\ifaa@letter\n \\definecolor{aa@colorletter}{gray}{0.6}\n\\fi\n\\newcommand*\\aa@topicsfont{\\fontsize{12}{14}\\sffamily\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@topicsnamefont{\\fontsize{17}{20}\\sffamily}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headnotefont{\\LARGE\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@defaultheadnotefont{\\LARGE\\sffamily\\bfseries\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@titlefont{\\LARGE \\sffamily\\bfseries\\boldmath}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subtitlefont{\\Large \\sffamily\\bfseries\\boldmath}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@authorfont{\\large}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@institutefont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@datefont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@dedicationfont{\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@abstractnamefont{\\small\\sffamily\\bfseries\\MakeUppercase}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywordnamefont{\\small\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywordfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@longauthfont{\\centering\\small\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@longauthname{Affiliations can be found after the references}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@longauthopen{(}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@longauthclose{)}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@acknowledgementsfont{\\tiny}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@acknowledgementsnamefont{\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@bibliographyfont{\\tiny}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@captionfont{\\normalfont\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headcaptionfont{\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablebibfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablebibnamefont{\\small\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablefootfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablefootnamefont{\\small\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@descriptionlabelfont{}\n\\newcommand\\aa@longtablecaptionfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand\\aa@longtableheadcaptionfont{\\small\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@emailfont{\\ttfamily}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@entryifont{\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@entryiifont{\\bfseries}\n\\newtoks\\authorlink\n\\newtoks\\yearCop\n\\newbox\\aa@stripbox\n\\newbox\\aa@outputbox\n\\newenvironment{aa@strip}\n{%\n \\onecolumn\\parindent0mm\n \\setbox\\aa@stripbox=\\vbox\\bgroup\n}\n{%\n \\egroup\n \\aa@@strip\n}\n\\def\\aa@@strip{%\n \\ifdim\\ht\\aa@stripbox>\\textheight\n \\global\\setbox\\aa@outputbox=\\vsplit\\aa@stripbox to \\textheight\n \\dp\\aa@outputbox \\z@\n \\box\\aa@outputbox\\clearpage\n \\expandafter\\aa@@strip\n \\else\n \\dp\\aa@stripbox \\z@\n \\twocolumn[\\box\\aa@stripbox]\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand{\\ErratumOf}[3][]{}\n\\newcommand{\\NoteFor}[3][]{}\n\\renewcommand*\\@fnsymbol[1]{%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\ifcase#1\n \\or\\star\n \\or{\\star}{\\star}\n \\or{\\star}{\\star}{\\star}%\n \\or{\\star}{\\star}{\\star}{\\star}\n \\or \\dagger\n \\or \\ddagger\n \\or \\mathsection\n \\or \\mathparagraph\n \\or \\|\n \\or **\n \\or \\dagger\\dagger\n \\or \\ddagger\\ddagger\n \\else \\@ctrerr\n \\fi\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand\\longempty{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@cntwords[1]{%\n \\protected@edef\\aa@cntwords@arg{#1\\space\\noexpand\\aa@nil\\space}%\n \\aa@nbwords \\z@\n \\let\\@@protect\\protect\n \\let\\protect\\@unexpandable@protect\n \\expandafter\\aa@@cntwords\\aa@cntwords@arg\n \\restore@protect\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@nnil{\\aa@nil}\n\\long\\def\\aa@@cntwords#1 {%\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\aa@nnil\n \\else\n \\advance\\aa@nbwords \\@ne\n \\expandafter\\aa@@cntwords\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@roheadletter{%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dima}\n {1in + \\topmargin + \\headheight - \\dp\\strutbox +\n 2\\aa@bleedmargin}%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dimb}\n {\\paperwidth - (1in + \\oddsidemargin + \\textwidth) +\n \\aa@bleedmargin - \\aa@hoffsetgray}%\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\aa@letternamefont \\lettername}%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dimc}\n {\\paperheight - \\aa@dima - \\wd0 + 2\\aa@bleedmargin}%\n \\addtolength{\\aa@voffsetlettername}{0.5cm}\n \\leavevmode\n \\hbox to0pt{%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@hoffsetgray}%\n \\vbox to0pt{%\n \\hsize=\\aa@dimb\n \\vskip-\\aa@dima\n \\colorbox{aa@colorletter}{%\n \\vtop{%\n \\vspace*{\\aa@voffsetlettername}%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@hoffsetlettername}%\n \\rotatebox{90}{\\aa@letternamefont \\lettername}%\n \\hfill\\null\n \\vspace*{\\aa@dimc}%\n }%\n }%\n \\vss\n }%\n \\hss\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@leheadletter{%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dima}\n {1in + \\topmargin + \\headheight - \\dp\\strutbox +\n 2\\aa@bleedmargin}%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dimb}\n {1in + \\oddsidemargin + \\aa@bleedmargin - \\aa@hoffsetgray}%\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\aa@letternamefont \\lettername}%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dimc}\n {\\paperheight-\\aa@dima-\\wd0+2\\aa@bleedmargin}%\n \\addtolength{\\aa@voffsetlettername}{0.5cm}\n \\leavevmode\n \\hspace*{-2\\fboxsep}%\n \\hbox to0pt{%\n \\hss\n \\vbox to0pt{%\n \\hsize=\\aa@dimb\n \\vskip-\\aa@dima\n \\colorbox{aa@colorletter}{%\n \\vtop{%\n \\vspace*{\\aa@voffsetlettername}%\n \\hfill\n \\rotatebox{90}{\\aa@letternamefont \\lettername}%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@hoffsetlettername}%\n \\vspace*{\\aa@dimc}%\n }%\n }%\n \\vss\n }%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@hoffsetgray}%\n }%\n}\n\\ifaa@online\n \\fancypagestyle{firstpage}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\fancyfoot[RO]{\\aa@footfont\\aa@publishlink\\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof}%\n \\fancyfoot[LE]{\\aa@footfont\\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof\\qquad\\aa@publishlink}%\n }\n\\else\n \\fancypagestyle{firstpage}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\fancyfoot[RO]{\\aa@footfont \\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof}%\n \\fancyfoot[LE]{\\aa@footfont \\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof}%\n }\n\\fi\n\\ifaa@contents\n \\fancypagestyle{otherpage}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\fancyhead[C]{\\aa@AAname}%\n \\fancyfoot[C]{\\aa@contentsname, \\aa@pagename\\space \\thepage}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n }\n\\else\\ifaa@contentsAut\n \\fancypagestyle{otherpage}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\fancyhead[C]{\\aa@AAname}%\n \\fancyfoot[C]{\\aa@contentsAutname, \\aa@pagename\\space \\thepage}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n }\n\\else\n \\fancypagestyle{otherpage}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\fancyhead[CO]{\\aa@headfont \\aa@headings}%\n \\fancyhead[CE]{\\aa@headfont \\ifx\\aa@idline\\empty\\aa@textidlineempty\\else\\aa@idline\\fi}%\n \\fancyfoot[RO]{\\aa@footfont \\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof}%\n \\fancyfoot[LE]{\\aa@footfont \\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n }\n\\fi\\fi\n\\pagestyle{otherpage}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headings{}\n\\renewcommand*\\date[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@date{#1}}%\n\\newcommand*\\aa@date{\\today}\n\\renewcommand*\\title[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@title{#1}}%\n\\newcommand*\\aa@title{}\n\\newcommand*\\subtitle[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@subtitle{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subtitle{}\n\\renewcommand*\\author[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@author{#1}%\n \\begingroup\n \\let\\and\\relax\n \\renewcommand*\\inst[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\thanks[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\email[1]{}%\n \\let\\@@protect\\protect\n \\let\\protect\\@unexpandable@protect\n \\global\\aa@nbauthors \\z@\n \\expandafter\\aa@cntauthors\\aa@author\\and\\aa@nil\\and\n \\restore@protect\n \\endgroup\n}%\n\\newcommand*\\aa@author{}\n\\def\\aa@cntauthors#1\\and{%\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\aa@nnil\n \\else\n \\global\\advance\\aa@nbauthors \\@ne\n \\expandafter\\aa@cntauthors\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\institute[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@institute{#1}\n \\begingroup\n \\let\\and\\relax\n \\renewcommand*\\inst[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\thanks[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\email[1]{}%\n \\let\\@@protect\\protect\n \\let\\protect\\@unexpandable@protect\n \\global\\aa@nbinstitutes \\z@\n \\expandafter\\aa@cntinstitutes\\aa@institute\\and\\aa@nil\\and\n \\restore@protect\n \\endgroup\n}%\n\\newcommand*\\aa@institute{}\n\\def\\aa@cntinstitutes#1\\and{%\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\aa@nnil\n \\else\n \\global\\advance\\aa@nbinstitutes \\@ne\n \\expandafter\\aa@cntinstitutes\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\inst[1]{\\unskip\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont$#1$}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fnmsep{\\unskip\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont,}}}\n\\newcommand*\\email[1]{e-mail: {\\aa@emailfont #1}}\n\\let\\endabstract\\relax\n\\renewcommand\\abstract[1]{%\n \\renewcommand\\aa@abstract@i{#1}%\n \\@ifnextchar\\bgroup{\\aa@abstract@next}{\\aa@abstract@one}\n}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@next[4]{%\n \\aa@structabstracttrue\n \\renewcommand\\aa@abstract@ii{#1}%\n \\renewcommand\\aa@abstract@iii{#2}%\n \\renewcommand\\aa@abstract@iv{#3}%\n \\renewcommand\\aa@abstract@v{#4}%\n \\begingroup\n \\renewcommand\\thanks[1]{}%\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@abstractwords{%\n \\aa@abstract@i \\space\n \\aa@abstract@ii \\space\n \\aa@abstract@iii \\space\n \\aa@abstract@iv \\space\n \\aa@abstract@v \\space\n }%\n \\endgroup\n \\aa@cnta \\z@\n \\aa@cntb \\aa@structabstractmax\n \\aa@abstract@cnt\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@abstract@one{%\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@abstractwords{\\aa@abstract@i}%\n \\aa@cnta \\z@\n \\aa@cntb \\aa@traditabstractmax\n \\aa@abstract@cnt\n}\n\\def\\aa@abstract@cnt{%\n \\aa@cntwords\\aa@abstractwords\n \\advance\\aa@nbwords \\aa@cnta\\relax\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbwords>\\aa@cntb\n \\typeout{^^J^^JIMPORTANT}\n \\ClassWarning{aa}\n {Around \\the\\aa@nbwords\\space words in the abstract instead\n of \\the\\aa@cntb\\space (max). You should rewrite your abstract}\n \\typeout{IMPORTANT\n ^^J}\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@i{}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@ii{}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@iii{}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@iv{}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@v{}\n\\newcommand*\\keywords[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@keywords{#1}%\n \\aa@keywords@cnt\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbwords>\\aa@keywordsmax\n \\ClassWarning{aa}\n {\\the\\aa@nbwords\\space keywords instead of a maximum of\n \\aa@keywordsmax\\space}\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywords{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@doublehyphen{--}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywords@cnt{%\n \\protected@edef\\aa@@keywords{\\aa@keywords--\\noexpand\\aa@nil--}%\n \\aa@nbwords \\z@\n \\let\\@@protect\\protect\n \\let\\protect\\@unexpandable@protect\n \\expandafter\\aa@@keywords@cnt\\aa@@keywords\n \\restore@protect\n}\n\\def\\aa@@keywords@cnt#1--{%\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\aa@nnil\n \\else\n \\advance\\aa@nbwords \\@ne\n \\expandafter\\aa@@keywords@cnt\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\topics[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@topics{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@topics{}\n\\newcommand*\\titlerunning[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@titlerunning{#1}\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@titlerunning{}\n\\newcommand*\\authorrunning[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@authorrunning{#1}\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@authorrunning{}\n\\newcommand*\\offprints[1]{%\n \\protected@edef\\@thanks{%\n \\@thanks\n \\protect\\footnotetext[0]{%\n \\unskip%\n \\if@wideboxfn%\n \\hspace{\\aa@removefootnotewbindentspace}%\n \\else%\n \\hspace{\\aa@removefootnoteindentspace}%\n \\fi\n {%\n \\aa@offprintsnamefont\n \\aa@offprintsname\n }: \\ignorespaces#1%\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\def\\aainstitutename{\\par\n \\begingroup\n \\renewcommand*\\and{%\n \\ifaa@longauth\\\\\\else\\par\\fi%\n \\refstepcounter{aa@institutecnt}%\n \\hangindent\\aa@instituteindent\n \\noindent\n \\ifaa@longauth\\hbox to-0.001\\aa@instituteindent\\else%\n \\hbox to\\aa@instituteindent\\fi%\n {%\n \\hss\n \\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont\\theaa@institutecnt}}%\n \\enspace\n }%\n \\ignorespaces\n }%\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbinstitutes>99\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont888}}\\enspace}%\n \\else\\ifnum\\aa@nbinstitutes>9\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont88}}\\enspace}%\n \\else\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont8}}\\enspace}%\n \\fi\\fi\n \\aa@instituteindent \\wd0\n {%\n \\aa@institutefont\n \\par\\refstepcounter{aa@institutecnt}%\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbinstitutes=1\\relax\n \\noindent\\ignorespaces\n \\else\n \\hangindent\\aa@instituteindent\n \\noindent\n \\hbox to\\aa@instituteindent{%\n \\hss\n \\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont\\theaa@institutecnt}}%\n \\enspace\n }\\ignorespaces%\n \\fi%\n \\aa@institute\\par\n }\n \\endgroup}\n\\newcommand*\\mail[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@mail{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@mail{}\n\\newcommand*\\msnr[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@msnr{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@msnr{}\n\\newcommand*\\idline[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@idline{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@idline{}\n\\newcommand*\\headnote[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@headnote{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headnote{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@defaultheadnote{Corrigendum}\n\\newcommand*\\dedication[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@dedication{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@dedication{}\n\\renewcommand*\\maketitle{%\n \\thispagestyle{firstpage}\n\\begingroup\n \\if@wideboxfn\n \\setlength\\bibindent{1.4\\parindent}\n \\else\n \\setlength\\bibindent{\\parindent}\n \\fi\n \\renewcommand*\\thefootnote{\\@fnsymbol\\c@footnote}%\n \\renewcommand\\@makefntext[1]{%\n \\ifaa@longfn\\hsize\\textwidth\\fi\n \\noindent\n \\hb@xt@\\bibindent{\\hss\\@makefnmark\\enspace}##1}\n \\ifaa@twocolumn\n \\begingroup\n \\twocolumn[\\aa@maketitle]\n \\@thanks\n \\endgroup\n \\else\n \\begingroup\n \\let\\thanks\\footnote\n \\aa@maketitle\n \\endgroup\n \\fi\n\\endgroup\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@maketitle{%\n \\ifaa@contents\n {\\aa@contentsnamefont \\aa@contentsname\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftercontentsnameskip}\n \\else\\ifaa@contentsAut\n {\\aa@contentsAutnamefont \\aa@contentsAutname\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftercontentsAutnameskip}\n \\else\n \\vbox to0pt{\\vskip\\aa@beforeheadboxskip\n \\nointerlineskip\n \\ifx\\aa@idline\\empty\n \\noindent\n \\fbox{%\n \\begin{minipage}{\\linewidth-2\\fboxsep-2\\fboxrule}\n \\strut\n {\\aa@journalnamefont \\aa@journalname}\n {\\aa@manuscriptnamefont \\aa@manuscriptname}\\\\\n \\ifx\\aa@msnr\\empty\n {\\strut\\aa@todayheadboxfont \\today}%\n \\else\n \\makebox[0.75\\linewidth][r]{%\n \\strut\n {\\aa@msnrheadboxfont \\aa@msnr}%\n }%\n \\fi\n \\end{minipage}%\n }%\n \\else\n \\begin{tabular}[b]{@{}l@{}}\n \\aa@idlinefont \\aa@idline\\\\\n \\aa@doifont \\aa@doi\\\\\n \\aa@copyrightfont \\aa@copyrightname~\\if!\\the\\yearCop!\\the\\year\\else\\the\\yearCop\\fi\n \\end{tabular}\n \\hfill\\AALogo\n \\fi\\vss}\n \\par\n \\ifx\\aa@topics\\empty%\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afterheadboxskip}\n \\else\n \\addvspace{\\aa@beforetopicsskip}\n {\\noindent\\aa@topicsfont \\aa@topics}%\n \\hfill\n {\\aa@topicsnamefont \\aa@topicsname\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftertopicsskip}\n \\fi\n \\begingroup\n \\centering\n \\ifaa@letter\n \\ifx\\aa@topics\\empty\n \\addvspace{1.8\\aa@beforeletternameskip}\n \\else\n \\addvspace{\\aa@beforeletternameskip}\n \\fi\n {\\aa@headletternamefont \\lettername\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afterletternameskip}\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\aa@headnote\\empty\\else\n \\ifx\\aa@headnote\\aa@defaultheadnote\\else\n {\\aa@headnotefont \\aa@headnote\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afterheadnoteskip}\n \\fi\n \\fi\n {\\aa@titlefont \\aa@title\\par}\n \\ifx\\aa@subtitle\\empty%\n \\ifx\\aa@headnote\\aa@defaultheadnote\n {\\aa@defaultheadnotefont (\\aa@headnote)\\par}\n \\fi\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftertitleskip}\n \\else\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftertitleskip}\n {\\aa@subtitlefont \\aa@subtitle\\par}\n \\ifx\\aa@headnote\\aa@defaultheadnote\n \\addvspace{\\aa@beforedefaultheadnoteskip}\n {\\aa@defaultheadnotefont (\\aa@headnote)\\par}\n \\fi\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftersubtitleskip}\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbauthors=\\tw@\n \\let\\and\\andtwoname\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\and{%\n \\advance\\aa@cnta \\@ne\n \\ifnum\\aa@cnta=\\aa@nbauthors\n \\andlastname\n \\else\n \\andname\n \\fi\n }\n \\fi\n \\aa@cnta \\@ne\n {\\aa@authorfont \\aa@author\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afterauthorskip}\n \\endgroup\n \\begingroup\n \\ifaa@longauth\\addvspace{-10pt}\n {\\noindent\\aa@longauthfont%\n \\aa@longauthopen\\aa@longauthname\\aa@longauthclose\\par}\n \\else\n \\leftskip \\aa@headingleftmargin\n \\rightskip \\aa@headingrightmargin\n \\aainstitutename\n \\fi\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterinstituteskip}\n {\\noindent\\aa@datefont\\ifaa@longauth\\centering\\fi \\aa@date\\par}\n \\ifx\\aa@dedication\\empty\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterdateskip}\n \\else\n \\addvspace\\baselineskip\n {\\noindent\\aa@dedicationfont \\aa@dedication\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterdedicationskip}\n \\fi\n {\\centering\\aa@abstractnamefont \\abstractname\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterabstractnameskip}\n \\ifaa@structabstract\n \\ifx\\aa@abstract@i\\longempty\\else\n {\\noindent\\aa@subabstractfont \\aa@subabstractiname. }%\n {\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@i\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}\n \\fi\n {\\noindent\\aa@subabstractfont \\aa@subabstractiiname. }%\n {\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@ii\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}\n {\\noindent\\aa@subabstractfont \\aa@subabstractiiiname. }%\n {\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@iii\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}\n {\\noindent\\aa@subabstractfont \\aa@subabstractivname. }%\n {\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@iv\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}\n \\ifx\\aa@abstract@v\\longempty\\else\n {\\noindent\\aa@subabstractfont \\aa@subabstractvname. }%\n {\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@v\\par}\n \\fi\n \\else\n {\\noindent\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@i\\par}\n \\fi\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterabstractskip}\n \\ifx\\aa@keywords\\empty\\else\n \\noindent\n {\\aa@keywordnamefont \\aa@keywordname. }\n {\\aa@keywordfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@keywords\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterkeywordsskip}\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\renewcommand*\\thanks[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\inst[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\fnmsep{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\and{, }%\n \\renewcommand*\\\\{ }%\n \\renewcommand*\\vspace[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\offprints[1]{}%\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@PDFauthor{\\if!\\the\\authorlink!\\aa@author\\else\\the\\authorlink\\fi}%\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@PDFtitle{\\noexpand\\protect\\noexpand\\aa@title}%\n \\def\\object##1{##1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@authorrunning\\empty\n \\let\\and\\relax\n \\renewcommand*\\\\{\\unskip\\space\\ignorespaces}%\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbauthors=1\n \\expandafter\\aa@extractoneauthor\\aa@author\\and\\aa@nil\n \\else\\ifnum\\aa@nbauthors=2\n \\expandafter\\aa@extracttwoauthor\\aa@author\\and\\aa@nil\n \\else\n \\expandafter\\aa@extractoneauthor\\aa@author\\and\\aa@nil\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@headings{\\aa@headings\\unskip\\space\\etalname\\space}%\n \\fi\\fi\n \\else\n \\xdef\\aa@headings{\\aa@authorrunning}%\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\aa@titlerunning\\empty\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@headings{\\aa@headings\\unskip: \\aa@title}%\n \\else\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@headings{\\aa@headings\\unskip: \\aa@titlerunning}%\n \\fi\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@securityheadmargin}%\n \\aa@headfont \\aa@headings\n }%\n \\ifdim\\wd0>\\aa@fullwidth\n \\typeout{^^J^^JIMPORTANT}\n \\ClassWarning{aa}\n {The running head built automatically\n from \\string\\author\\space and \\string\\title\n exceeds the pagewidth, please supply a shorter form\n with \\string\\authorrunning\\space and/or\n \\string\\titlerunning\\space prior to \\string\\maketitle}\n {Use \\string\\titlerunning\\space to supply a shorter\n title and/or \\string\\authorrunning\\space to supply a\n shorter list of authors.}%\n \\typeout{IMPORTANT\n ^^J}\n \\fi\n \\fi\\fi\n}\n\\def\\aa@extractoneauthor#1\\and#2\\aa@nil{%\n \\gdef\\aa@headings{#1}%\n}\n\\def\\aa@extracttwoauthor#1\\and#2\\and#3\\aa@nil{%\n \\gdef\\aa@headings{#1\\andtwoname#2}%\n}\n\\def\\sectcounterend{.}\n\\def\\@seccntformat#1{\\csname the#1\\endcsname\\sectcounterend\n\\hskip\\betweenumberspace}\n\\def\\@sect#1#2#3#4#5#6[#7]#8{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth\n \\let\\@svsec\\@empty\n \\else\n \\refstepcounter{#1}%\n \\protected@edef\\@svsec{\\@seccntformat{#1}\\relax}%\n \\fi\n \\@tempskipa #5\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n \\begingroup\n #6{%\n \\@hangfrom{\\hskip #3\\relax\\@svsec}%\n \\raggedright\n \\hyphenpenalty \\@M%\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M #8\\@@par}%\n \\endgroup\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}%\n \\fi\n #7}%\n \\else\n \\def\\@svsechd{%\n #6{\\hskip #3\\relax\n \\@svsec #8\\hskip\\aftertext}%\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}%\n \\fi\n #7}}%\n \\fi\n \\@xsect{#5}}\n\\ifaa@contentsAut\n \\renewcommand\\section{%\n \\@startsection{section}\n {1}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd \\@plus-4\\p@ \\@minus-4\\p@}\n {6dd}\n {\\large\\bfseries\\boldmath\\MakeUppercase}%\n }\n\\else\\ifaa@contents\n \\renewcommand\\section{%\n \\@startsection{section}\n {1}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd \\@plus-4\\p@ \\@minus-4\\p@}\n {6dd}\n {\\large\\bfseries\\boldmath\\MakeUppercase}%\n }\n\\else\n \\renewcommand\\section{%\n \\@startsection{section}\n {1}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd\\@plus-4\\p@ \\@minus-4\\p@}\n {6dd}\n {\\large\\sffamily\\bfseries\\boldmath}%\n }\n\\fi\\fi\n\\renewcommand\\subsection{%\n \\@startsection{subsection}\n {2}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd}\n {6dd}\n {\\normalsize\\sffamily\\itshape}%\n}\n\\renewcommand\\subsubsection{%\n \\@startsection{subsubsection}\n {3}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd}\n {6dd}\n {\\normalsize\\sffamily}%\n}\n\\renewcommand\\paragraph{%\n \\@startsection{paragraph}\n {4}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd}\n {-\\fontdimen2\\font\n \\@plus-\\fontdimen3\\font\n \\@minus-\\fontdimen4\\font}\n {\\normalsize\\sffamily}%\n}\n\\renewcommand\\subparagraph{%\n \\ClassError{aa}{Command \\string\\subparagrap\\space isn't allowed}\n {Only commands from \\string\\section\\space to\n \\string\\paragraph\\space are allowed.}\n}\n\\renewcommand\\part{%\n \\ClassError{aa}{Command \\string\\part\\space isn't allowed}\n {Only commands from \\string\\section\\space to\n \\string\\paragraph\\space are allowed.}\n}\n\\frenchspacing\n\\clubpenalty=10000\n\\widowpenalty=10000\n\\flushbottom\n\\ifaa@twocolumn\n \\sloppy\n\\fi\n\\newenvironment{nopar}\n {\\let\\par\\relax%\n \\aa@acknowledgementsfont\n {%\n \\noindent\\aa@acknowledgementsnamefont\n \\aa@acknowledgementsname.%\n }%\n \\hskip.5em\n }{}\n\\newenvironment{acknowledgements}\n {%\n \\par\\addvspace{\\aa@beforeacknowledgementsskip}\n \\begin{spacing}{0.81}\n \\begin{nopar}\n }\n {%\n \\end{nopar}\n \\end{spacing}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afteracknowledgementsskip}\n }\n\\let\\acknowledgement\\acknowledgements\n\\let\\endacknowledgement\\endacknowledgements\n\\renewcommand\\@makefntext[1]{%\n \\noindent\n \\hb@xt@\\bibindent{\\hss\\@makefnmark\\enspace}#1}\n\\newcommand\\listofobjects{\\if@myobjects%\n \\section*{\\listobjectname}\n \\@starttoc{obj}\\fi%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\l@obj[2]{\\noindent`#1' on page #2\\par}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand{\\object}[1]{%\n #1\\global\\let\\if@myobjects\\iftrue%\n \\addcontentsline{obj}{obj}{#1}%\n}\n\\newcommand\\longtab[2][]{%\n\\if!\\@aatolm!\n \\aalongfloat{table}{#2}%\n\\else\n \\aalongfloat[#1]{section}{#2}%\n\\fi\n}\n\\newcommand\\aalongfloat[3][]{%\n \\AtEndDocument{%\n \\aa@savecounter \\csname c@#2\\endcsname \\relax\n \\csname c@#2\\endcsname\n }%\n \\edef\\aa@nombre{\\number\\csname c@#2\\endcsname}%\n\\if!\\@aatolm!\n \\expandafter\\AtEndDocument\\expandafter{%\n \\aa@nombre\\relax\n \\setlength{\\LTcapwidth}{\\textwidth}\n \\onecolumn\n #3%\n \\twocolumn\n \\csname c@#2\\endcsname \\aa@savecounter \\relax\n }%\n \\stepcounter{#2}%\n\\else\n \\expandafter\\AtEndDocument\\expandafter{%\n \\aa@nombre\\relax\n \\setlength{\\LTcapwidth}{\\textwidth}\n \\onecolumn\n\\setcounter{table}{#1}\\addtocounter{table}{-1}\n\\renewcommand\\thesection{\\Alph{section}}%\n\\renewcommand\\thetable{\\thesection.\\arabic{table}}\n #3%\n \\twocolumn\n \\csname c@#2\\endcsname \\aa@savecounter \\relax\n }%\n \\setcounter{table}{#1}\n\\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@defineentry{%\n \\newcommand{\\entry}[3]{%\n \\par\\noindent\n {\\aa@entryiifont ##2}%\n \\par\n {%\n \\noindent\n \\raggedright\n {\\aa@entryifont ##1}%\n \\hfill\n \\rlap{\\makebox[\\aa@entryboxwidth][l]{\\hfill##3}}%\n \\par\n }%\n \\vspace{\\aftertext}\n }\n}\n\\ifaa@contents \\aa@defineentry \\fi\n\\ifaa@contentsAut \\aa@defineentry \\fi\n\\renewcommand\\@listi{%\n \\leftmargin \\leftmargini\n \\parsep \\z@ \\@plus\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\topsep 8\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\itemsep \\parsep\n}\n\\let\\listI\\@listi\n\\@listi\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\let\\@listi\\listI\n \\@listi\n}\n\\renewcommand\\@listii{%\n \\leftmargin \\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth \\leftmarginii\n \\advance\\labelwidth -\\labelsep\n \\topsep \\z@\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\itemsep \\z@\n}\n\\renewcommand\\@listiii{%\n \\leftmargin \\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth \\leftmarginiii\n \\advance\\labelwidth -\\labelsep\n \\topsep \\z@\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\itemsep \\z@\n \\partopsep \\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n }\n\\newcommand*\\aa@setitemindent[1]{%\n \\settowidth{\\labelwidth}{\\aa@descriptionlabelfont #1}%\n \\leftmargini \\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmargini \\labelsep\n \\renewcommand*\\@listi{%\n \\leftmargin \\leftmargini\n \\labelwidth \\leftmargini\n \\advance\\labelwidth -\\labelsep\n \\parsep \\parskip\n \\topsep \\medskipamount\n \\itemsep \\parskip\n \\advance\\itemsep -\\parsep\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@setitemitemindent[1]{%\n \\settowidth{\\labelwidth}{\\aa@descriptionlabelfont #1}%\n \\leftmarginii \\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmarginii \\labelsep\n \\renewcommand*\\@listii{%\n \\leftmargin \\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth \\leftmarginii\n \\advance\\labelwidth -\\labelsep\n \\parsep \\parskip\n \\topsep \\z@\n \\itemsep \\parskip\n \\advance\\itemsep -\\parsep\n }%\n}\n\\renewcommand*\\descriptionlabel[1]{\\hspace\\labelsep #1\\hfil}\n\\renewcommand*\\description{%\n \\@ifnextchar[{\\aa@description} % ] (pour Emacs)\n {%\n \\list{}{%\n \\labelwidth\\z@\n \\itemindent -\\leftmargin\n \\let\\makelabel\\descriptionlabel\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand\\aa@description[1][]{%\n \\relax\\ifnum\\@listdepth=0\n \\aa@setitemindent{#1}%\n \\else\\ifnum\\@listdepth=1\n \\aa@setitemitemindent{#1}%\n \\fi\\fi\n \\list{--}{\\let\\makelabel\\aa@descriptionlabel}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@descriptionlabel[1]{%\n \\aa@descriptionlabelfont\n #1%\n \\hfil\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@theorem@aftercount{.}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@theorem@aftertitle{.}\n\\renewcommand*\\newtheorem{%\n \\@ifstar{\\aa@theorem@withstar}{\\aa@theorem@nostar}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@theorem@nostar{%\n \\aa@numberedtheoremtrue\n \\aa@newtheorem\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@theorem@withstar{%\n \\aa@numberedtheoremfalse\n \\aa@newtheorem\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@newtheorem[1]{%\n \\def\\aa@theorem@name{#1}%\n \\expandafter\\newif\\csname ifaa@theorem@#1@numbered\\endcsname\n \\ifaa@numberedtheorem\n \\csname aa@theorem@#1@numberedtrue\\endcsname\n \\fi\n \\aa@@newtheorem\n}\n\\newif\\ifaa@newcounter\n\\newcommand*\\aa@@newtheorem[2][]{%\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\empty\n \\expandafter\\edef\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname\n {AA\\aa@theorem@name}%\n \\aa@newcountertrue\n \\else\n \\expandafter\\ifx\n \\csname aa@theorem@#1@title\\endcsname\n \\relax\n \\ClassError{aa}\n {#1 isn't a theorem-like environment}\n {You have to create #1 with \\string\\newtheorem\\space\n before use its counter.}%\n \\expandafter\\edef\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname\n {AA\\aa@theorem@name}%\n \\aa@newcountertrue\n \\else\n \\expandafter\\def\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname\n {AA#1}%\n \\aa@newcounterfalse\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\expandafter\\newcommand\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @title\\endcsname\n {#2}%\n \\aa@@@newtheorem\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@@@newtheorem[3][]{%\n \\ifaa@newcounter\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\empty\n \\newcounter{\\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname}%\n \\else\n \\newcounter{\\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname}[#1]%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\n \\csname theaa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname{%\n \\expandafter\\noexpand\\csname the#1\\endcsname.%\n \\noexpand\\arabic{aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter}%\n }%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\expandafter\\newcommand\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @titlefont\\endcsname{#2}%\n \\expandafter\\newcommand\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @bodyfont\\endcsname{#3}%\n \\newenvironment{\\aa@theorem@name}[1][]{%\n \\def\\aa@theorem@optionnal{##1}%\n \\par\\addvspace{\\VSpaceBeforeTheorem}%\n \\noindent\\hspace*{\\HSpaceIndentTheorem}%\n \\begingroup\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\@currenvir @titlefont\\endcsname\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\@currenvir @title\\endcsname\n \\csname ifaa@theorem@\\@currenvir @numbered\\endcsname\n \\refstepcounter{\\csname aa@theorem@\\@currenvir @counter\\endcsname}%\n \\space\n \\csname the\\csname aa@theorem@\\@currenvir @counter\\endcsname\\endcsname\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\aa@theorem@optionnal\\empty\n \\aa@theorem@aftercount\n \\else\n \\space(\\aa@theorem@optionnal)%\n \\aa@theorem@aftertitle\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\ifdim\\HVSpaceSepTheorem<\\z@\n \\par\\nobreak\n \\vspace{-\\HVSpaceSepTheorem}%\n \\noindent\\hspace*{\\HSpaceIndentTheorem}%\n \\else\n \\hspace*{\\HVSpaceSepTheorem}%\n \\fi\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\@currenvir @bodyfont\\endcsname\n }%\n {%\n \\par\\addvspace{\\VSpaceAfterTheorem}\n }%\n}\n\\newtheorem*{proof}{Proof}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}{\\bfseries}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{exercise}[theorem]{Exercise}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\newtheorem{note}[theorem]{Note}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{problem}[theorem]{Problem}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\newtheorem{question}[theorem]{Question}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{solution}[theorem]{Solution}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\setlength{\\textfloatsep}{18\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\dbltextfloatsep}{18\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\@fptop}{\\z@}\n\\setlength{\\@fpsep}{12\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\@dblfptop}{\\z@}\n\\setlength{\\@dblfpsep}{12\\p@}\n\\setcounter{topnumber}{4}\n\\renewcommand*\\topfraction{.9}\n\\setcounter{bottomnumber}{2}\n\\renewcommand*\\bottomfraction{.5}\n\\setcounter{totalnumber}{6}\n\\renewcommand*\\textfraction{.05}\n\\renewcommand*\\floatpagefraction{.95}\n\\setcounter{dbltopnumber}{3}\n\\renewcommand*\\dbltopfraction{.9}\n\\renewcommand*\\dblfloatpagefraction{.95}\n\\renewcommand*\\fps@figure{tbp}\n\\renewcommand*\\fps@table{tbp}\n\\def\\sidecaption#1\\caption{%\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\ignorespaces#1\\unskip}%\n \\aa@sidecaptionwidth=\\linewidth\n \\advance\\aa@sidecaptionwidth -\\wd0\n \\advance\\aa@sidecaptionwidth -\\aa@figgap\n \\ifdim\\aa@sidecaptionwidth<\\aa@sidecaptionminwidth\n \\ClassWarning{aa}{%\n No sufficient room for the legend;\n using normal \\string\\caption.%\n }%\n \\let\\aa@caption\\@caption\n \\unhbox0\n \\else\n \\let\\aa@caption\\aa@sidecaption\n \\dimen0 \\dp0\n \\advance\\dimen0 \\ht0\n \\dp0 \\dp\\strutbox\n \\advance\\dimen0-\\dp0\n \\ht0 \\dimen0\n \\unhbox0\\hspace{\\aa@figgap}%\n \\fi\n \\refstepcounter\\@captype\n \\@dblarg{\\aa@caption\\@captype}%\n}\n\\long\\def\\aa@sidecaption#1[#2]#3{%\n \\addcontentsline\n {\\csname ext@#1\\endcsname}\n {#1}\n {\\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}{\\ignorespaces #2}}%\n \\begingroup\n \\@parboxrestore\n \\aa@makesidecaption{\\csname fnum@#1\\endcsname}{\\ignorespaces #3}%\n \\par\n \\endgroup\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@capstrut{%\n \\leavevmode\n \\vrule \\@width\\z@ \\@height\\ht\\strutbox \\@depth\\z@\n}\n\\def\\aa@@makecaption#1{%\n {\\aa@headcaptionfont #1\\aa@floatcounterend}%\n}\n\\long\\def\\aa@makesidecaption#1#2{%\n \\parbox[b]{\\aa@sidecaptionwidth}{%\n \\aa@captionfont\n \\aa@@makecaption{#1}\n \\aa@capstrut\n #2%\n }%\n}\n\\renewcommand\\@makecaption[2]{%\n \\aa@captionfont\n \\ifx\\@captype\\aa@figtype\n \\par\\vskip\\VSpaceBeforeFigCaption\n \\aa@@makecaption{#1}%\n \\aa@capstrut%\n #2%\n \\par\n \\else\n {\\aa@headcaptionfont #1\\aa@floatcounterend}%\n \\aa@capstrut\n #2%\n \\par\n \\vskip\\VSpaceAfterTabCaption\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand\\tablebib[1]{\\VSpaceBeforeTabFoot=1ex%\n \\par\\vspace{\\VSpaceBeforeTabBib}\n \\noindent\n \\begin{minipage}{\\linewidth}\n {\\aa@tablebibnamefont\\aa@tablebibname.}~%\n \\aa@tablebibfont\n \\ignorespaces\n #1%\n \\end{minipage}%\n}\n\\newcommand\\tablefoot[1]{\\VSpaceBeforeTabBib=1ex%\n \\par\\vspace{\\VSpaceBeforeTabFoot}\n \\noindent\n \\begin{minipage}{\\linewidth}\n {\\aa@tablefootnamefont\\aa@tablefootname.}~%\n \\aa@tablefootfont\n \\ignorespaces\n #1%\n \\end{minipage}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\tablefootmark[1]{%\n \\unskip\n \\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont\\itshape\\ignorespaces#1}}%\n \\,%\n \\ignorespaces\n}\n\\newcommand\\tablefoottext[2]{%\n \\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont({\\itshape\\ignorespaces#1})}}%\n ~%\n \\ignorespaces\n #2\\ \\ignorespaces%\n}\n% Numbering lines in PDF for all options author's versions\n\\RequirePackage[modulo,mathlines,switch,running,columnwise,pagewise]{linenoaa}\n\\columnwiselinenumbersfalse%\n\\runningpagewiselinenumbers%\n%\n\\setlength\\bibindent{1em}\n\\renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]{%\n \\begingroup\n \\section*{\\refname}%\n \\@mkboth{\\refname}{\\refname}%\n \\aa@bibliographyfont\n \\list{\\@biblabel{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n {%\n \\settowidth\\labelwidth{\\@biblabel{#1}}%\n \\ifaa@bibnumber\n \\leftmargin\\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\labelsep\n \\else\n \\leftmargin\\bibindent\n \\setlength{\\itemindent}{-\\leftmargin}\n \\fi\n \\@openbib@code\n \\usecounter{enumiv}%\n \\let\\p@enumiv\\@empty\n \\renewcommand\\theenumiv{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}%\n }%\n \\sloppy\n \\clubpenalty4000\n \\@clubpenalty \\clubpenalty\n \\widowpenalty4000%\n \\sfcode`\\.\\@m\n}{%\n \\endlist\\par\\endgroup%\n \\ifaa@longauth\\nolinenumbers%\n \\kern6pt\\hrule\\kern6pt\\aainstitutename\\aa@longauthfalse\\fi%\n \\ifaa@referee\\if!\\csname appendix\\endcsname!\\relax\\else\\listofobjects\\fi\\fi\n \\def\\@noitemerr{\\ClassWarning{aa}{Empty `thebibliography' environment}}%\n}\n\\def \\@floatboxreset {%\n \\reset@font\n \\ifx\\@captype\\aa@tabtype\n \\small\n \\spacetab\n \\fi\n \\@setnobreak\n \\@setminipage\n}\n\\def\\spacetab{%\n\\abovedisplayshortskip-10pt%\n\\belowdisplayshortskip0pt%\n}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand{\\ion}[2]{\\textup{#1\\,\\textsc{\\lowercase{#2}}}}\n\\newcommand*\\element[1][]{%\n \\def\\aa@element@tr{#1}%\n \\aa@element\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@element[1][]{%\n \\def\\aa@element@tl{#1}%\n \\aa@@element\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@@element[1][]{%\n \\def\\aa@element@bl{#1}%\n \\aa@@@element\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@@@element[2][]{%\n \\def\\aa@element@br{#1}%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\vphantom{x}^{\\aa@element@tl}_{\\aa@element@bl}\n \\mathrm{#2}\n \\vphantom{x}^{\\aa@element@tr}_{\\aa@element@br}\n }%\n}\n\\renewcommand*\\vec[1]{\\ensuremath{\\boldsymbol{#1}}}\n\\newcommand*\\tens[1]{\\ensuremath{\\mathsf{#1}}}\n\\newcommand*\\sq{%\n \\ifmmode\n \\Box\n \\else\n \\begingroup\n \\unskip\\nobreak\n \\hfil\n \\penalty50\n \\hskip1em\n \\null\\nobreak\\hfil$\\Box$%\n \\parfillskip=0pt\n \\finalhyphendemerits=0\n \\endgraf\n \\endgroup\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\sun{\\ensuremath{\\odot}}\n\\newcommand*\\degr{\\ensuremath{^\\circ}}\n\\newcommand*\\arcmin{\\ensuremath{^\\prime}}\n\\newcommand*\\arcsec{\\ensuremath{^{\\prime\\prime}}}\n\\def\\utw{\\ensuremath{\\smash{\\rlap{\\lower5pt\\hbox{$\\sim$}}}}}\n\\def\\udtw{\\ensuremath{\\smash{\\rlap{\\lower6pt\\hbox{$\\approx$}}}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fd{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\text{d}}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fh{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\text{h}}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fm{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\text{m}}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fs{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\text{s}}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fdg{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\circ}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\farcm{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\prime}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\farcs{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\prime\\prime}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fp{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\scriptscriptstyle\\text{p}}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\cor{\\ensuremath{\\mathrel{\\widehat{=}}}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@centerstack[2]{%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\mathrel{%\n \\mathchoice{%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr#1\\cr#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr#1\\cr#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr#1\\cr#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr#1\\cr#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\la{\\aa@centerstack{<}{\\sim}}\n\\newcommand*\\ga{\\aa@centerstack{>}{\\sim}}\n\\newcommand*\\sol{\\aa@centerstack{\\sim}{<}}\n\\newcommand*\\sog{\\aa@centerstack{\\sim}{>}}\n\\newcommand*\\lse{\\aa@centerstack{<}{\\simeq}}\n\\newcommand*\\gse{\\aa@centerstack{>}{\\simeq}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@centerstackskip[6]{%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\mathrel{%\n \\mathchoice{%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n #1\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip#3}#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n #1\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip#4}#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n #1\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip#5}#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n #1\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip#6}#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\grole{\\aa@centerstackskip{>}{<}{-1.5\\p@}{-1.5\\p@}{-1\\p@}{-.5\\p@}}\n\\newcommand*\\leogr{\\aa@centerstackskip{<}{>}{-1.5\\p@}{-1.5\\p@}{-1\\p@}{-.5\\p@}}\n\\newcommand*\\loa{\\aa@centerstack{<}{\\approx}}\n\\newcommand*\\goa{\\aa@centerstack{>}{\\approx}}\n\\newcommand*\\diameter{%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\mathchoice{%\n \\ooalign{%\n \\hfil\\hbox{$\\displaystyle/$}\\hfil\\crcr\n {\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\mathchar\"20D$}}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\ooalign{%\n \\hfil\\hbox{$\\textstyle/$}\\hfil\\crcr\n {\\hbox{$\\textstyle\\mathchar\"20D$}}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\ooalign{%\n \\hfil\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle/$}\\hfil\\crcr\n {\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle\\mathchar\"20D$}}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\ooalign{%\n \\hfil\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle/$}\\hfil\\crcr\n {\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\mathchar\"20D$}}%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\let\\olddiameter\\diameter\n\\newcommand*\\getsto{\\aa@centerstack{\\gets}{\\to}}\n\\newcommand*\\lid{\\aa@centerstackskip{<}{=}{1.2\\p@}{1.2\\p@}{1\\p@}{0.9\\p@}}\n\\newcommand*\\gid{\\aa@centerstackskip{>}{=}{1.2\\p@}{1.2\\p@}{1\\p@}{0.9\\p@}}\n\\newcommand*\\bbbone{%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\mathchoice{\\mathrm 1\\mskip-4mu l}\n {\\mathrm 1\\mskip-4mu l}\n {\\mathrm 1\\mskip-4.5mu l}\n {\\mathrm 1\\mskip-5mu l}%\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aap{A\\&A}\n\\let\\astap=\\aap\n\\newcommand*\\aapr{A\\&A~Rev.}\n\\newcommand*\\aaps{A\\&AS}\n\\newcommand*\\actaa{Acta Astron.}\n\\newcommand*\\aj{AJ}\n\\newcommand*\\ao{Appl.~Opt.}\n\\let\\applopt\\ao\n\\newcommand*\\apj{ApJ}\n\\newcommand*\\apjl{ApJ}\n\\let\\apjlett\\apjl\n\\newcommand*\\apjs{ApJS}\n\\let\\apjsupp\\apjs\n\\newcommand*\\aplett{Astrophys.~Lett.}\n\\newcommand*\\apspr{Astrophys.~Space~Phys.~Res.}\n\\newcommand*\\apss{Ap\\&SS}\n\\newcommand*\\araa{ARA\\&A}\n\\newcommand*\\azh{AZh}\n\\newcommand*\\baas{BAAS}\n\\newcommand*\\bac{Bull. astr. Inst. Czechosl.}\n\\newcommand*\\bain{Bull.~Astron.~Inst.~Netherlands}\n\\newcommand*\\caa{Chinese Astron. Astrophys.}\n\\newcommand*\\cjaa{Chinese J. Astron. Astrophys.}\n\\newcommand*\\fcp{Fund.~Cosmic~Phys.}\n\\newcommand*\\gca{Geochim.~Cosmochim.~Acta}\n\\newcommand*\\grl{Geophys.~Res.~Lett.}\n\\newcommand*\\iaucirc{IAU~Circ.}\n\\newcommand*\\icarus{Icarus}\n\\newcommand*\\jcap{J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.}\n\\newcommand*\\jcp{J.~Chem.~Phys.}\n\\newcommand*\\jgr{J.~Geophys.~Res.}\n\\newcommand*\\jqsrt{J.~Quant.~Spectr.~Rad.~Transf.}\n\\newcommand*\\jrasc{JRASC}\n\\newcommand*\\memras{MmRAS}\n\\newcommand*\\memsai{Mem.~Soc.~Astron.~Italiana}\n\\newcommand*\\mnras{MNRAS}\n\\newcommand*\\na{New A}\n\\newcommand*\\nar{New A Rev.}\n\\newcommand*\\nat{Nature}\n\\newcommand*\\natastro{Nat.~Astron.}\n\\newcommand*\\nphysa{Nucl.~Phys.~A}\n\\newcommand*\\pasa{PASA}\n\\newcommand*\\pasj{PASJ}\n\\newcommand*\\pasp{PASP}\n\\newcommand*\\physrep{Phys.~Rep.}\n\\newcommand*\\physscr{Phys.~Scr}\n\\newcommand*\\planss{Planet.~Space~Sci.}\n\\newcommand*\\pra{Phys.~Rev.~A}\n\\newcommand*\\prb{Phys.~Rev.~B}\n\\newcommand*\\prc{Phys.~Rev.~C}\n\\newcommand*\\prd{Phys.~Rev.~D}\n\\newcommand*\\pre{Phys.~Rev.~E}\n\\newcommand*\\prl{Phys.~Rev.~Lett.}\n\\newcommand*\\procspie{Proc.~SPIE}\n\\newcommand*\\qjras{QJRAS}\n\\newcommand*\\rmxaa{Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis.}\n\\newcommand*\\skytel{S\\&T}\n\\newcommand*\\solphys{Sol.~Phys.}\n\\newcommand*\\sovast{Soviet~Ast.}\n\\newcommand*\\ssr{Space~Sci.~Rev.}\n\\newcommand*\\zap{ZAp}\n\\DeclareMathAlphabet{\\mathsfsl}{OT1}{txss}{m}{sl}\n\\g@addto@macro{\\endlongtable}{\\addvspace{-3.5mm}}\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n\\@ifpackageloaded{lscape}{%\n\\g@addto@macro{\\landscape}{\\centering\\setlength{\\LTcapwidth}{\\aa@fullheight}}}{}\n\\@ifpackageloaded{pdflscape}{%\n\\g@addto@macro{\\landscape}{\\centering\\setlength{\\LTcapwidth}{\\aa@fullheight}}}{}\n\\@ifpackageloaded{aalongtable}%\n{\\def\\LS@rot{%\n \\setbox\\@outputbox\\vbox\n to\\aa@fullheight{\\vfill\\centerline{\\rotatebox{90}{\\box\\@outputbox}}\\vfill}}}{}\n\\@ifpackageloaded{subfigure}%\n{\\renewcommand*{\\thesubfigure}{\\alph{subfigure}}\n\\renewcommand*{\\@thesubfigure}{(\\thesubfigure)\\hskip\\subfiglabelskip}\n\\renewcommand*{\\@@thesubfigure}{(\\thesubfigure)}%\n\\renewcommand*{\\thesubtable}{\\alph{subtable}}\n\\renewcommand*{\\@thesubtable}{(\\thesubtable)\\hskip\\subfiglabelskip}\n\\renewcommand*{\\@@thesubtable}{(\\thesubtable)}}{}\n\\@ifpackageloaded{wasysym}%\n{\\let\\diameter\\olddiameter}{}\n\\@ifpackageloaded{txfonts}%\n{%\n \\newcommand*\\bbba{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{A}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbb{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{B}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbc{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{C}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbd{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{D}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbe{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{E}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbf{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{F}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbg{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{G}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbh{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{H}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbi{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{I}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbj{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{J}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbk{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{K}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbl{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{L}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbm{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{M}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbn{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{N}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbo{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{O}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbp{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{P}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbq{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{Q}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbr{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{R}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbs{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{S}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbt{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{T}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbu{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{U}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbv{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{V}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbw{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{W}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbx{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{X}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbby{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{Y}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbz{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{Z}}}}%\n{%\n \\newcommand*\\bbba{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{A}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbb{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{B}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbc{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{C}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbd{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{D}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbe{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{E}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbf{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{F}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbg{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{G}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbh{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{H}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbi{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{I}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbj{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{J}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbk{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{K}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbl{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{L}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbm{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{M}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbn{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{N}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbo{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{O}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbp{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{P}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbq{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{Q}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbr{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{R}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbs{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{S}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbt{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{T}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbu{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{U}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbv{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{V}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbw{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{W}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbx{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{X}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbby{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{Y}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbz{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{Z}}}}\n%\\@ifpackageloaded{hyperref}%\n%{}{\\RequirePackage[colorlinks=true,\n% linkcolor=blue, citecolor=blue, filecolor=blue, urlcolor=blue]{hyperref}}%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Macro ORCID %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%\\long\\def\\orcid#1{\\unskip\\protect\\href{https://orcid.org/#1}{\\protect\\includegraphics[width=8pt,clip]{logo_orcid}}}%\n%\\long\\def\\orcidlink#1{\\unskip\\protect\\href{https://orcid.org/#1}{\\protect\\includegraphics[width=8pt,clip]{logo_orcid}}}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n}\n\\setlength\\leftmargini {\\parindent}\n\\leftmargin \\leftmargini\n\\setlength\\leftmarginii {\\parindent}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiii {1.87em}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiv {1.7em}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginv {.5em}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginvi {.5em}\n\\setlength \\labelsep {.5em}\n\\setlength \\labelwidth{\\leftmargini}\n\\addtolength\\labelwidth{-\\labelsep}\n\\renewcommand\\theenumi{\\@arabic\\c@enumi}\n\\renewcommand\\theenumii{\\@alph\\c@enumii}\n\\renewcommand\\theenumiii{\\@roman\\c@enumiii}\n\\renewcommand\\theenumiv{\\@Alph\\c@enumiv}\n\\renewcommand\\labelenumi{\\theenumi.}\n\\renewcommand\\labelenumii{(\\theenumii)}\n\\renewcommand\\labelenumiii{\\theenumiii.}\n\\renewcommand\\labelenumiv{\\theenumiv.}\n\\renewcommand\\p@enumii{\\theenumi}\n\\renewcommand\\p@enumiii{\\theenumi(\\theenumii)}\n\\renewcommand\\p@enumiv{\\p@enumiii\\theenumiii}\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemi{\\normalfont\\bfseries --}\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemii{\\normalfont\\bfseries --}\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemiii{$\\m@th\\bullet$}\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemiv{$\\m@th\\cdot$}\n\\def\\arxivprefixe{arXiv}\n\\def\\arxivprefixesep{:}\n\\def\\arxiv#1{%\n{\\tt \\arxivprefixe\\arxivprefixesep\\ignorespaces#1}%\n}\n\\newcommand{\\eprint}[2][]{%\n{\\tt\\if!#1!#2\\else#1\\arxivprefixesep\\ignorespaces#2\\fi}%\n}\n% \\corr : Mute tag used by LE\n\\newcommand{\\corr}[1]{#1}\n%\n% Package required for complexed name figure files\n\\RequirePackage{grffile}\n%\n\\endinput\n%%\n%% End of file `aa.cls'.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: linenoaa.sty\n================================================\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[2003/12/01]\n\\ProvidesPackage{linenoaa}[2023/03/12 v0.02]\n\n\\providecommand{\\addto}[2]{%\n \\ifx#1\\@undefined\n \\def#1{#2}%\n \\else\n \\ifx#1\\relax\n \\def#1{#2}%\n \\else\n {\\toks@\\expandafter{#1#2}%\n \\xdef#1{\\the\\toks@}}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n}\n\n\\newif\\ifGPL@lineno@desactivate\n\\GPL@lineno@desactivatefalse\n\n\\DeclareOption{desactivate}{\n\t\\providecommand{\\@LN}{\\@gobbletwo}\n\t\\providecommand{\\@LN@col}{\\@gobble}\n\t\\GPL@lineno@desactivatetrue\t\n}\n\\DeclareOption*{\n\t\\PassOptionsToPackage{\\CurrentOption}{lineno}\n}\n\\ProcessOptions\\relax\n\n\\ifGPL@lineno@desactivate\n\t\\endinput\n\\fi\n\n\\RequirePackage{lineno}[2005/11/02 v4.41]\n\n%\\addto\\maketitle{\\linenumbers\\relax}\n\\addto\\maketitle{\\nolinenumbers\\relax}\n\n\\def\\linenumberfont{\\normalfont\\scriptsize\\sffamily}\n\n\\modulolinenumbers[10]\n\n\\@namedef{eqnarray*}{\\def\\@eqncr{\\nonumber\\@seqncr}\\linenomath\\eqnarray}\n\\@namedef{endeqnarray*}{\\nonumber\\endeqnarray\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\@ifpackageloaded{amsmath}{%\n\\renewenvironment{multline}{\\linenomathNonumbers\\start@multline\\st@rredfalse}{%\n\t\\iftagsleft@ \\@xp\\lendmultline@ \\else \\@xp\\rendmultline@ \\fi\n\t\\endlinenomath\\ignorespacesafterend}\n\n\\renewenvironment{multline*}{\\linenomath\\start@multline\\st@rredtrue}{\\endmultline\\endlinenomath}\n\n\n\\renewenvironment{gather}{\\linenomathNonumbers\\start@gather\\st@rredfalse}{%\n \\math@cr \\black@\\totwidth@ \\egroup\n $$\\endlinenomath\\ignorespacesafterend}\n\n\\renewenvironment{gather*}{\\linenomath\\start@gather\\st@rredtrue}{\\endgather\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{alignat}{\\linenomathNonumbers\\start@align\\z@\\st@rredfalse}{%\n\\endalign\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{alignat*}{\\linenomath\\start@align\\z@\\st@rredtrue}{\\endalign\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{xalignat}{\\linenomathNonumbers\\start@align\\@ne\\st@rredfalse}{%\n\\endalign\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{xalignat*}{\\linenomath\\start@align\\@ne\\st@rredtrue}{\\endalign\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{xxalignat}{\\linenomath\\start@align\\tw@\\st@rredtrue}{\\endalign\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{align}{\\linenomathNonumbers\\start@align\\@ne\\st@rredfalse\\m@ne}{%\n \\math@cr \\black@\\totwidth@\n \\egroup\n \\ifingather@\n \\restorealignstate@\n \\egroup\n \\nonumber\n \\ifnum0=`{\\fi\\iffalse}\\fi\n \\else\n $$%\n \\fi\n \\endlinenomath\n \\ignorespacesafterend}\n \n\\renewenvironment{align*}{\\linenomath\\start@align\\@ne\\st@rredtrue\\m@ne}{\\endalign\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{flalign}{\\linenomathNonumbers\\start@align\\tw@\\st@rredfalse\\m@ne}{%\n\\endalign\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{flalign*}{\\linenomath\\start@align\\tw@\\st@rredtrue\\m@ne}{\\endalign\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{equation}{%\n \\linenomathNonumbers\\incr@eqnum\n \\mathdisplay@push\n \\st@rredfalse \\global\\@eqnswtrue\n \\mathdisplay{equation}%\n}{%\n \\endmathdisplay{equation}%\n \\mathdisplay@pop\n \\endlinenomath\n \\ignorespacesafterend}\n \n\\renewenvironment{equation*}{%\n \\linenomath\\mathdisplay@push\n \\st@rredtrue \\global\\@eqnswfalse\n \\mathdisplay{equation*}%\n}{%\n \\endmathdisplay{equation*}%\n \\mathdisplay@pop\n \\endlinenomath\n \\ignorespacesafterend}}{%\n\\def\\equation{\\linenomathNonumbers$$\\refstepcounter{equation}}\n\\def\\endequation{\\eqno \\hbox{\\@eqnnum}$$\\endlinenomath\\@ignoretrue}}\n\n\\@ifpackagewith{amsmath}{fleqn}{%\n\\renewenvironment{eqnarray}{%\n \\stepcounter{equation}%\n \\def\\@currentlabel{\\p@equation\\theequation}%\n \\global\\@eqnswtrue\\m@th\n \\global\\@eqcnt\\z@\n \\tabskip\\mathindent\n \\let\\\\=\\@eqncr\n \\setlength\\abovedisplayskip{\\topsep}%\n \\ifvmode\n \\addtolength\\abovedisplayskip{\\partopsep}%\n \\fi\n \\addtolength\\abovedisplayskip{\\parskip}%\n \\setlength\\belowdisplayskip{\\abovedisplayskip}%\n \\setlength\\belowdisplayshortskip{\\abovedisplayskip}%\n \\setlength\\abovedisplayshortskip{\\abovedisplayskip}%\n \\linenomathNonumbers$$\\everycr{}\\halign to\\linewidth% $$\n \\bgroup\n \\hskip\\@centering\n $\\displaystyle\\tabskip\\z@skip{##}$\\@eqnsel&%\n \\global\\@eqcnt\\@ne \\hskip \\tw@\\arraycolsep \\hfil${##}$\\hfil&%\n \\global\\@eqcnt\\tw@ \\hskip \\tw@\\arraycolsep\n $\\displaystyle{##}$\\hfil \\tabskip\\@centering&%\n \\global\\@eqcnt\\thr@@\n \\hb@xt@\\z@\\bgroup\\hss##\\egroup\\tabskip\\z@skip\\cr}%\n {\\@@eqncr\n \\egroup\n \\global\\advance\\c@equation\\m@ne$$% $$\n \\endlinenomath\n \\@ignoretrue}}{}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.bbl\n================================================\n\\begin{thebibliography}{115}\n\\expandafter\\ifx\\csname natexlab\\endcsname\\relax\\def\\natexlab#1{#1}\\fi\n\n\\bibitem[{{Alberts} {et~al.}(2024){Alberts}, {Williams}, {Helton}, {Suess},\n {Ji}, {Shivaei}, {Lyu}, {Rieke}, {Baker}, {Bonaventura}, {Bunker},\n {Carniani}, {Charlot}, {Curtis-Lake}, {D'Eugenio}, {Eisenstein}, {de Graaff},\n {Hainline}, {Hausen}, {Johnson}, {Maiolino}, {Parlanti}, {Rieke},\n {Robertson}, {Sun}, {Tacchella}, {Willmer}, \\& {Willott}}]{Alberts2024}\n{Alberts}, S., {Williams}, C.~C., {Helton}, J.~M., {et~al.} 2024,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cc}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975...85A}{975, 85}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Arango-Toro} {et~al.}(2025){Arango-Toro}, {Ilbert}, {Ciesla},\n {Shuntov}, {Aufort}, {Mercier}, {Laigle}, {Franco}, {Bethermin}, {Le Borgne},\n {Dubois}, {McCracken}, {Paquereau}, {Huertas-Company}, {Kartaltepe}, {Casey},\n {Akins}, {Allen}, {Andika}, {Brinch}, {Drakos}, {Faisst}, {Gozaliasl},\n {Harish}, {Kaminsky}, {Koekemoer}, {Kokorev}, {Liu}, {Magdis}, {Martin},\n {Moutard}, {Rhodes}, {Rich}, {Robertson}, {Sanders}, {Sheth}, {Talia},\n {Toft}, {Tresse}, {Valentino}, {Vijayan}, \\& {Weaver}}]{ArangoToro2024}\n{Arango-Toro}, R.~C., {Ilbert}, O., {Ciesla}, L., {et~al.} 2025,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452519}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...696A.159A}{696, A159}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Arnouts} {et~al.}(2002){Arnouts}, {Moscardini}, {Vanzella},\n {Colombi}, {Cristiani}, {Fontana}, {Giallongo}, {Matarrese}, \\&\n {Saracco}}]{Arnouts02_LP}\n{Arnouts}, S., {Moscardini}, L., {Vanzella}, E., {et~al.} 2002,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.04988.x}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.329..355A}{329, 355}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Arnouts} {et~al.}(2007){Arnouts}, {Walcher}, {Le F{\\`e}vre},\n {Zamorani}, {Ilbert}, {Le Brun}, {Pozzetti}, {Bardelli}, {Tresse}, {Zucca},\n {Charlot}, {Lamareille}, {McCracken}, {Bolzonella}, {Iovino}, {Lonsdale},\n {Polletta}, {Surace}, {Bottini}, {Garilli}, {Maccagni}, {Picat},\n {Scaramella}, {Scodeggio}, {Vettolani}, {Zanichelli}, {Adami}, {Cappi},\n {Ciliegi}, {Contini}, {de la Torre}, {Foucaud}, {Franzetti}, {Gavignaud},\n {Guzzo}, {Marano}, {Marinoni}, {Mazure}, {Meneux}, {Merighi}, {Paltani},\n {Pell{\\`o}}, {Pollo}, {Radovich}, {Temporin}, \\& {Vergani}}]{Arnouts2007}\n{Arnouts}, S., {Walcher}, C.~J., {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O., {et~al.} 2007,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077632}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...476..137A}{476, 137}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Behroozi} {et~al.}(2019){Behroozi}, {Wechsler}, {Hearin}, \\&\n {Conroy}}]{Behroozi19}\n{Behroozi}, P., {Wechsler}, R.~H., {Hearin}, A.~P., \\& {Conroy}, C. 2019,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1182}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.3143B}{488, 3143}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Bellagamba} {et~al.}(2018){Bellagamba}, {Roncarelli}, {Maturi}, \\&\n {Moscardini}}]{Bellagamba2018}\n{Bellagamba}, F., {Roncarelli}, M., {Maturi}, M., \\& {Moscardini}, L. 2018,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2701}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.5221B}{473, 5221}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Berti} {et~al.}(2017){Berti}, {Coil}, {Behroozi}, {Eisenstein},\n {Bray}, {Cool}, \\& {Moustakas}}]{Berti2017}\n{Berti}, A.~M., {Coil}, A.~L., {Behroozi}, P.~S., {et~al.} 2017,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/87}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...834...87B}{834, 87}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Berti} {et~al.}(2021){Berti}, {Coil}, {Hearin}, \\&\n {Behroozi}}]{Berti2021}\n{Berti}, A.~M., {Coil}, A.~L., {Hearin}, A.~P., \\& {Behroozi}, P.~S. 2021,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/abcc6a}{\\color{blue}\\aj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161...49B}{161, 49}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Berti} {et~al.}(2019){Berti}, {Coil}, {Hearin}, \\&\n {Moustakas}}]{Berti2019}\n{Berti}, A.~M., {Coil}, A.~L., {Hearin}, A.~P., \\& {Moustakas}, J. 2019,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab3b5d}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...884...76B}{884, 76}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Binh} {et~al.}(2025){Binh}, {Long}, {Antwi-Danso}, {Andrews},\n {Toni}, {Champagne}, {Akins}, {Anderson}, {Arango-Toro}, {Casey}, {Cheng},\n {Cooper}, {Drakos}, {Faisst}, {Franco}, {Gammon}, {Hirschmann}, {Ilbert},\n {Kartaltepe}, {Koekemoer}, {Liu}, {Magdis}, {Maturi}, {McCracken},\n {Moscardini}, {Paquereau}, {Rhodes}, {Rich}, {Robertson}, {Shamyati},\n {Shuntov}, \\& {Xu}}]{Binh2025}\n{Binh}, N., {Long}, A.~S., {Antwi-Danso}, J., {et~al.} 2025,\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv251214881B}{\\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.14881}{\\color{blue}arXiv\n e-prints}, arXiv:2512.14881}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Bluck} {et~al.}(2022){Bluck}, {Maiolino}, {Brownson}, {Conselice},\n {Ellison}, {Piotrowska}, \\& {Thorp}}]{Bluck2022}\n{Bluck}, A. F.~L., {Maiolino}, R., {Brownson}, S., {et~al.} 2022,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202142643}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...659A.160B}{659, A160}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Boquien} {et~al.}(2019){Boquien}, {Burgarella}, {Roehlly}, {Buat},\n {Ciesla}, {Corre}, {Inoue}, \\& {Salas}}]{Boquien19_CIGALE}\n{Boquien}, M., {Burgarella}, D., {Roehlly}, Y., {et~al.} 2019,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201834156}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A.103B}{622, A103}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Boselli} {et~al.}(2022){Boselli}, {Fossati}, \\& {Sun}}]{Boselli2022}\n{Boselli}, A., {Fossati}, M., \\& {Sun}, M. 2022,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00159-022-00140-3}{\\color{blue}\\aapr},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&ARv..30....3B}{30, 3}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Boselli} \\& {Gavazzi}(2006)}]{Boselli2006}\n{Boselli}, A. \\& {Gavazzi}, G. 2006,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/500691}{\\color{blue}\\pasp},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006PASP..118..517B}{118, 517}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Bower} {et~al.}(2006){Bower}, {Benson}, {Malbon}, {Helly}, {Frenk},\n {Baugh}, {Cole}, \\& {Lacey}}]{Bower2006}\n{Bower}, R.~G., {Benson}, A.~J., {Malbon}, R., {et~al.} 2006,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10519.x}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.370..645B}{370, 645}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Calderon} {et~al.}(2018){Calderon}, {Berlind}, \\&\n {Sinha}}]{Calderon2018}\n{Calderon}, V.~F., {Berlind}, A.~A., \\& {Sinha}, M. 2018,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2000}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.2031C}{480, 2031}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Campbell} {et~al.}(2015){Campbell}, {van den Bosch}, {Hearin},\n {Padmanabhan}, {Berlind}, {Mo}, {Tinker}, \\& {Yang}}]{Campbell2015}\n{Campbell}, D., {van den Bosch}, F.~C., {Hearin}, A., {et~al.} 2015,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1091}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452..444C}{452, 444}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Carnall} {et~al.}(2023){Carnall}, {McLeod}, {McLure}, {Dunlop},\n {Begley}, {Cullen}, {Donnan}, {Hamadouche}, {Jewell}, {Jones}, {Pollock}, \\&\n {Wild}}]{Carnall2023}\n{Carnall}, A.~C., {McLeod}, D.~J., {McLure}, R.~J., {et~al.} 2023,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad369}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.3974C}{520, 3974}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Carnall} {et~al.}(2018){Carnall}, {McLure}, {Dunlop}, \\&\n {Dav{\\'e}}}]{Carnall2018}\n{Carnall}, A.~C., {McLure}, R.~J., {Dunlop}, J.~S., \\& {Dav{\\'e}}, R. 2018,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2169}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.4379C}{480, 4379}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Casey} {et~al.}(2023){Casey}, {Kartaltepe}, {Drakos}, {Franco},\n {Harish}, {Paquereau}, {Ilbert}, {Rose}, {Cox}, {Nightingale}, {Robertson},\n {Silverman}, {Koekemoer}, {Massey}, {McCracken}, {Rhodes}, {Akins}, {Allen},\n {Amvrosiadis}, {Arango-Toro}, {Bagley}, {Bongiorno}, {Capak}, {Champagne},\n {Chartab}, {Ch{\\'a}vez Ortiz}, {Chworowsky}, {Cooke}, {Cooper}, {Darvish},\n {Ding}, {Faisst}, {Finkelstein}, {Fujimoto}, {Gentile}, {Gillman}, {Gould},\n {Gozaliasl}, {Hayward}, {He}, {Hemmati}, {Hirschmann}, {Jahnke}, {Jin},\n {Khostovan}, {Kokorev}, {Lambrides}, {Laigle}, {Larson}, {Leung}, {Liu},\n {Liaudat}, {Long}, {Magdis}, {Mahler}, {Mainieri}, {Manning}, {Maraston},\n {Martin}, {McCleary}, {McKinney}, {McPartland}, {Mobasher}, {Pattnaik},\n {Renzini}, {Rich}, {Sanders}, {Sattari}, {Scognamiglio}, {Scoville}, {Sheth},\n {Shuntov}, {Sparre}, {Suzuki}, {Talia}, {Toft}, {Trakhtenbrot}, {Urry},\n {Valentino}, {Vanderhoof}, {Vardoulaki}, {Weaver}, {Whitaker}, {Wilkins},\n {Yang}, \\& {Zavala}}]{Casey23_CWeb}\n{Casey}, C.~M., {Kartaltepe}, J.~S., {Drakos}, N.~E., {et~al.} 2023,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acc2bc}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954...31C}{954, 31}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Cattaneo} {et~al.}(2006){Cattaneo}, {Dekel}, {Devriendt},\n {Guiderdoni}, \\& {Blaizot}}]{Cattaneo2006}\n{Cattaneo}, A., {Dekel}, A., {Devriendt}, J., {Guiderdoni}, B., \\& {Blaizot},\n J. 2006,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10608.x}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.370.1651C}{370, 1651}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Chabrier}(2003)}]{Chabrier03}\n{Chabrier}, G. 2003,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/376392}{\\color{blue}\\pasp},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASP..115..763C}{115, 763}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Coil} {et~al.}(2017){Coil}, {Mendez}, {Eisenstein}, \\&\n {Moustakas}}]{Coil2017}\n{Coil}, A.~L., {Mendez}, A.~J., {Eisenstein}, D.~J., \\& {Moustakas}, J. 2017,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa63ec}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...838...87C}{838, 87}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Croton} {et~al.}(2007){Croton}, {Gao}, \\& {White}}]{Croton2007}\n{Croton}, D.~J., {Gao}, L., \\& {White}, S. D.~M. 2007,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11230.x}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.374.1303C}{374, 1303}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Croton} {et~al.}(2006){Croton}, {Springel}, {White}, {De Lucia},\n {Frenk}, {Gao}, {Jenkins}, {Kauffmann}, {Navarro}, \\& {Yoshida}}]{Croton2006}\n{Croton}, D.~J., {Springel}, V., {White}, S. D.~M., {et~al.} 2006,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09675.x}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.365...11C}{365, 11}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Darvish} {et~al.}(2014){Darvish}, {Sobral}, {Mobasher}, {Scoville},\n {Best}, {Sales}, \\& {Smail}}]{Darvish2014}\n{Darvish}, B., {Sobral}, D., {Mobasher}, B., {et~al.} 2014,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/51}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...796...51D}{796, 51}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Dashyan} {et~al.}(2019){Dashyan}, {Choi}, {Somerville}, {Naab},\n {Quirk}, {Hirschmann}, \\& {Ostriker}}]{Dashyan2019}\n{Dashyan}, G., {Choi}, E., {Somerville}, R.~S., {et~al.} 2019,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1697}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.5889D}{487, 5889}\n\n\\bibitem[{{de Graaff} {et~al.}(2025){de Graaff}, {Setton}, {Brammer}, {Cutler},\n {Suess}, {Labb{\\'e}}, {Leja}, {Weibel}, {Maseda}, {Whitaker}, {Bezanson},\n {Boogaard}, {Cleri}, {De Lucia}, {Franx}, {Greene}, {Hirschmann}, {Matthee},\n {McConachie}, {Naidu}, {Oesch}, {Price}, {Rix}, {Valentino}, {Wang}, \\&\n {Williams}}]{deGraaff2025}\n{de Graaff}, A., {Setton}, D.~J., {Brammer}, G., {et~al.} 2025,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41550-024-02424-3}{\\color{blue}Nature\n Astronomy}, \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025NatAs...9..280D}{9,\n 280}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Dekel} \\& {Birnboim}(2006)}]{Dekel2006}\n{Dekel}, A. \\& {Birnboim}, Y. 2006,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10145.x}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.368....2D}{368, 2}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Dressler}(1980)}]{Dressler1980}\n{Dressler}, A. 1980, \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/157753}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ApJ...236..351D}{236, 351}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Fang} {et~al.}(2018){Fang}, {Faber}, {Koo}, {Rodr{\\'\\i}guez-Puebla},\n {Guo}, {Barro}, {Behroozi}, {Brammer}, {Chen}, {Dekel}, {Ferguson},\n {Gawiser}, {Giavalisco}, {Kartaltepe}, {Kocevski}, {Koekemoer}, {McGrath},\n {McIntosh}, {Newman}, {Pacifici}, {Pandya}, {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez},\n {Primack}, {Salmon}, {Trump}, {Weiner}, {Willner}, {Acquaviva}, {Dahlen},\n {Finkelstein}, {Finlator}, {Fontana}, {Galametz}, {Grogin}, {Gruetzbauch},\n {Johnson}, {Mobasher}, {Papovich}, {Pforr}, {Salvato}, {Santini}, {van der\n Wel}, {Wiklind}, \\& {Wuyts}}]{Fang2018}\n{Fang}, J.~J., {Faber}, S.~M., {Koo}, D.~C., {et~al.} 2018,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aabcba}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...858..100F}{858, 100}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Farouki} \\& {Shapiro}(1981)}]{Farouki&Shapiro1981}\n{Farouki}, R. \\& {Shapiro}, S.~L. 1981,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/158563}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ApJ...243...32F}{243, 32}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Fontana} {et~al.}(2009){Fontana}, {Santini}, {Grazian},\n {Pentericci}, {Fiore}, {Castellano}, {Giallongo}, {Menci}, {Salimbeni},\n {Cristiani}, {Nonino}, \\& {Vanzella}}]{Fontana2009}\n{Fontana}, A., {Santini}, P., {Grazian}, A., {et~al.} 2009,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200911650}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...501...15F}{501, 15}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Geha} {et~al.}(2012){Geha}, {Blanton}, {Yan}, \\&\n {Tinker}}]{Geha2012}\n{Geha}, M., {Blanton}, M.~R., {Yan}, R., \\& {Tinker}, J.~L. 2012,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/85}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757...85G}{757, 85}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Groth} \\& {Peebles}(1977)}]{Groth&Peebles1977}\n{Groth}, E.~J. \\& {Peebles}, P.~J.~E. 1977,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/155588}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ApJ...217..385G}{217, 385}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Gunn} \\& {Gott}(1972)}]{Gunn&Gott1972}\n{Gunn}, J.~E. \\& {Gott}, III, J.~R. 1972,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/151605}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972ApJ...176....1G}{176, 1}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Guo} {et~al.}(2017){Guo}, {Bell}, {Lu}, {Koo}, {Faber}, {Koekemoer},\n {Kurczynski}, {Lee}, {Papovich}, {Chen}, {Dekel}, {Ferguson}, {Fontana},\n {Giavalisco}, {Kocevski}, {Nayyeri}, {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, {Pforr},\n {Rodr{\\'\\i}guez-Puebla}, \\& {Santini}}]{Guo2017}\n{Guo}, Y., {Bell}, E.~F., {Lu}, Y., {et~al.} 2017,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa70e9}{\\color{blue}\\apjl},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...841L..22G}{841, L22}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Hartley} {et~al.}(2015){Hartley}, {Conselice}, {Mortlock},\n {Foucaud}, \\& {Simpson}}]{Hartley2015}\n{Hartley}, W.~G., {Conselice}, C.~J., {Mortlock}, A., {Foucaud}, S., \\&\n {Simpson}, C. 2015,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv972}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.1613H}{451, 1613}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Hatamnia} {et~al.}(2026){Hatamnia}, {Mobasher}, {Taamoli},\n {Kartaltepe}, {Casey}, {Akins}, {Brinch}, {Chartab}, {Drakos}, {Faisst},\n {Finkelstein}, {Franco}, {Giddings}, {Gozaliasl}, {Hadi}, {Haghjoo},\n {Harish}, {Ilbert}, {Jablonka}, {Jin}, {Khostovan}, {Koekemoer}, {Laishram},\n {Liu}, {Maturi}, {McCracken}, {Martin}, {Moscardini}, {Scognamiglio},\n {Shuntov}, {Toni}, {de la Vega}, {Weaver}, \\& {Yang}}]{Hatamnia2026}\n{Hatamnia}, H., {Mobasher}, B., {Taamoli}, S., {et~al.} 2026,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae5bac}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ..1002..192H}{1002, 192}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Hatfield} \\& {Jarvis}(2017)}]{Hatfield&Jarvis17}\n{Hatfield}, P.~W. \\& {Jarvis}, M.~J. 2017,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2155}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472.3570H}{472, 3570}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Hearin} {et~al.}(2016{\\natexlab{a}}){Hearin}, {Behroozi}, \\& {van\n den Bosch}}]{Hearin2016a}\n{Hearin}, A.~P., {Behroozi}, P.~S., \\& {van den Bosch}, F.~C.\n 2016{\\natexlab{a}},\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1462}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461.2135H}{461, 2135}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Hearin} {et~al.}(2017){Hearin}, {Campbell}, {Tollerud}, {Behroozi},\n {Diemer}, {Goldbaum}, {Jennings}, {Leauthaud}, {Mao}, {More}, {Parejko},\n {Sinha}, {Sip{\\\"o}cz}, \\& {Zentner}}]{Hearin2017}\n{Hearin}, A.~P., {Campbell}, D., {Tollerud}, E., {et~al.} 2017,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa859f}{\\color{blue}\\aj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154..190H}{154, 190}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Hearin} \\& {Watson}(2013)}]{Hearin&Watson2013}\n{Hearin}, A.~P. \\& {Watson}, D.~F. 2013,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1374}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.435.1313H}{435, 1313}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Hearin} {et~al.}(2015){Hearin}, {Watson}, \\& {van den\n Bosch}}]{Hearin2015}\n{Hearin}, A.~P., {Watson}, D.~F., \\& {van den Bosch}, F.~C. 2015,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1358}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452.1958H}{452, 1958}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Hearin} {et~al.}(2016{\\natexlab{b}}){Hearin}, {Zentner}, {van den\n Bosch}, {Campbell}, \\& {Tollerud}}]{Hearin2016b}\n{Hearin}, A.~P., {Zentner}, A.~R., {van den Bosch}, F.~C., {Campbell}, D., \\&\n {Tollerud}, E. 2016{\\natexlab{b}},\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw840}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460.2552H}{460, 2552}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Ilbert} {et~al.}(2006){Ilbert}, {Arnouts}, {McCracken},\n {Bolzonella}, {Bertin}, {Le F{\\`e}vre}, {Mellier}, {Zamorani}, {Pell{\\`o}},\n {Iovino}, {Tresse}, {Le Brun}, {Bottini}, {Garilli}, {Maccagni}, {Picat},\n {Scaramella}, {Scodeggio}, {Vettolani}, {Zanichelli}, {Adami}, {Bardelli},\n {Cappi}, {Charlot}, {Ciliegi}, {Contini}, {Cucciati}, {Foucaud}, {Franzetti},\n {Gavignaud}, {Guzzo}, {Marano}, {Marinoni}, {Mazure}, {Meneux}, {Merighi},\n {Paltani}, {Pollo}, {Pozzetti}, {Radovich}, {Zucca}, {Bondi}, {Bongiorno},\n {Busarello}, {de La Torre}, {Gregorini}, {Lamareille}, {Mathez}, {Merluzzi},\n {Ripepi}, {Rizzo}, \\& {Vergani}}]{Ilbert06_LP}\n{Ilbert}, O., {Arnouts}, S., {McCracken}, H.~J., {et~al.} 2006,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20065138}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...457..841I}{457, 841}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Ilbert} {et~al.}(2013){Ilbert}, {McCracken}, {Le F{\\`e}vre},\n {Capak}, {Dunlop}, {Karim}, {Renzini}, {Caputi}, {Boissier}, {Arnouts},\n {Aussel}, {Comparat}, {Guo}, {Hudelot}, {Kartaltepe}, {Kneib}, {Krogager},\n {Le Floc'h}, {Lilly}, {Mellier}, {Milvang-Jensen}, {Moutard}, {Onodera},\n {Richard}, {Salvato}, {Sanders}, {Scoville}, {Silverman}, {Taniguchi},\n {Tasca}, {Thomas}, {Toft}, {Tresse}, {Vergani}, {Wolk}, \\&\n {Zirm}}]{Ilbert2013}\n{Ilbert}, O., {McCracken}, H.~J., {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O., {et~al.} 2013,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321100}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A..55I}{556, A55}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Jarvis} {et~al.}(2004){Jarvis}, {Bernstein}, \\&\n {Jain}}]{Jarvis_treecorr}\n{Jarvis}, M., {Bernstein}, G., \\& {Jain}, B. 2004,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07926.x}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.352..338J}{352, 338}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Jego} {et~al.}(2026){Jego}, {B{\\'e}thermin}, {Kraljic}, {Laigle},\n {Wang}, {La Marca}, {Ilbert}, {Akins}, {Casey}, {Leroy}, {Hadi},\n {Kartaltepe}, {Koekemoer}, {McCracken}, {Paquereau}, {Rhodes}, {Robertson},\n {Shuntov}, {Toni}, \\& {Xu}}]{Jego2026}\n{Jego}, B., {B{\\'e}thermin}, M., {Kraljic}, K., {et~al.} 2026,\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260221890J}{\\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.21890}{\\color{blue}arXiv\n e-prints}, arXiv:2602.21890}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Ji} {et~al.}(2018){Ji}, {Giavalisco}, {Williams}, {Faber},\n {Ferguson}, {Guo}, {Liu}, \\& {Lee}}]{Ji18}\n{Ji}, Z., {Giavalisco}, M., {Williams}, C.~C., {et~al.} 2018,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aacc2c}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...862..135J}{862, 135}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Kauffmann} {et~al.}(2013){Kauffmann}, {Li}, {Zhang}, \\&\n {Weinmann}}]{Kauffmann2013}\n{Kauffmann}, G., {Li}, C., {Zhang}, W., \\& {Weinmann}, S. 2013,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt007}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430.1447K}{430, 1447}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Kaviraj} {et~al.}(2025){Kaviraj}, {Lazar}, {Watkins}, {Laigle},\n {Martin}, \\& {Jackson}}]{Kaviraj2025}\n{Kaviraj}, S., {Lazar}, I., {Watkins}, A.~E., {et~al.} 2025,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf233}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.538..153K}{538, 153}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Kawinwanichakij} {et~al.}(2016){Kawinwanichakij}, {Quadri},\n {Papovich}, {Kacprzak}, {Labb{\\'e}}, {Spitler}, {Straatman}, {Tran}, {Allen},\n {Behroozi}, {Cowley}, {Dekel}, {Glazebrook}, {Hartley}, {Kelson}, {Koo},\n {Lee}, {Lu}, {Nanayakkara}, {Persson}, {Primack}, {Tilvi}, {Tomczak}, \\& {van\n Dokkum}}]{Kawinwanichakij2016}\n{Kawinwanichakij}, L., {Quadri}, R.~F., {Papovich}, C., {et~al.} 2016,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/9}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...817....9K}{817, 9}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Khostovan} {et~al.}(2026){Khostovan}, {Kartaltepe}, {Salvato},\n {Ilbert}, {Casey}, {Algera}, {Antwi-Danso}, {Battisti}, {Brinch}, {Brusa},\n {Calabr{\\`o}}, {Capak}, {Chartab}, {Cooper}, {Cox}, {Darvish}, {Drakos},\n {Faisst}, {George}, {Gozaliasl}, {Harish}, {Hasinger}, {Hatamnia}, {Iovino},\n {Jin}, {Kashino}, {Koekemoer}, {Laishram}, {Lee}, {Lertprasertpong}, {Lilly},\n {Liu}, {Masters}, {Mobasher}, {Nagao}, {Onodera}, {Peng}, {Sanders},\n {Sanders}, {Sattari}, {Scoville}, {Shah}, {Silverman}, {Suzuki}, {Taamoli},\n {Tanaka}, {Tasca}, {Toft}, {Toni}, {Trakhtenbrot}, {Trump}, {Vaccari},\n {Valentino}, {Vanderhoof}, {Weaver}, {Yun}, \\& {Zavala}}]{Khostovan2025}\n{Khostovan}, A.~A., {Kartaltepe}, J.~S., {Salvato}, M., {et~al.} 2026,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ae1cb9}{\\color{blue}\\apjs},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJS..282....6K}{282, 6}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Knobel} {et~al.}(2015){Knobel}, {Lilly}, {Woo}, \\&\n {Kova{\\v{c}}}}]{Knobel2015}\n{Knobel}, C., {Lilly}, S.~J., {Woo}, J., \\& {Kova{\\v{c}}}, K. 2015,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/24}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...800...24K}{800, 24}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Labb{\\'e}} {et~al.}(2005){Labb{\\'e}}, {Huang}, {Franx}, {Rudnick},\n {Barmby}, {Daddi}, {van Dokkum}, {Fazio}, {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber},\n {Moorwood}, {Rix}, {R{\\\"o}ttgering}, {Trujillo}, \\& {van der\n Werf}}]{Labbe2005}\n{Labb{\\'e}}, I., {Huang}, J., {Franx}, M., {et~al.} 2005,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/430700}{\\color{blue}\\apjl},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...624L..81L}{624, L81}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Lacerna} {et~al.}(2018){Lacerna}, {Contreras}, {Gonz{\\'a}lez},\n {Padilla}, \\& {Gonzalez-Perez}}]{Lacerna2018}\n{Lacerna}, I., {Contreras}, S., {Gonz{\\'a}lez}, R.~E., {Padilla}, N., \\&\n {Gonzalez-Perez}, V. 2018,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx3253}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475.1177L}{475, 1177}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Laigle} {et~al.}(2018){Laigle}, {Pichon}, {Arnouts}, {McCracken},\n {Dubois}, {Devriendt}, {Slyz}, {Le Borgne}, {Benoit-L{\\'e}vy}, {Hwang},\n {Ilbert}, {Kraljic}, {Malavasi}, {Park}, \\& {Vibert}}]{Laigle2018}\n{Laigle}, C., {Pichon}, C., {Arnouts}, S., {et~al.} 2018,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx3055}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.5437L}{474, 5437}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Landy} \\& {Szalay}(1993)}]{LandySzalay93}\n{Landy}, S.~D. \\& {Szalay}, A.~S. 1993,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/172900}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...412...64L}{412, 64}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Li} {et~al.}(2025){Li}, {Conselice}, {Sarron}, {Harvey}, {Austin},\n {Adams}, {Trussler}, {Duan}, {Ferreira}, {Westcott}, {Harris}, {Dole},\n {Grogin}, {Frye}, {Koekemoer}, {Robertson}, {Windhorst}, {Polletta}, {Hathi},\n \\& {Jansen}}]{Li2025}\n{Li}, Q., {Conselice}, C.~J., {Sarron}, F., {et~al.} 2025,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf543}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.539.1796L}{539, 1796}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Lim} {et~al.}(2025){Lim}, {Tacchella}, {Maiolino}, {Lovell}, \\&\n {Schaye}}]{Lim2025}\n{Lim}, S., {Tacchella}, S., {Maiolino}, R., {Lovell}, C.~C., \\& {Schaye}, J.\n 2025,\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv251109618L}{\\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.09618}{\\color{blue}arXiv\n e-prints}, arXiv:2511.09618}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Long} {et~al.}(2024){Long}, {Antwi-Danso}, {Lambrides}, {Lovell},\n {de la Vega}, {Valentino}, {Zavala}, {Casey}, {Wilkins}, {Yung}, {Arrabal\n Haro}, {Bagley}, {Bisigello}, {Chworowsky}, {Cooper}, {Cooper}, {Cooray},\n {Croton}, {Dickinson}, {Finkelstein}, {Franco}, {Gould}, {Hirschmann},\n {Hutchison}, {Kartaltepe}, {Kocevski}, {Koekemoer}, {Lucas}, {McKinney},\n {Nere}, {Papovich}, {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, {Pirzkal}, \\&\n {Santini}}]{Long2024}\n{Long}, A.~S., {Antwi-Danso}, J., {Lambrides}, E.~L., {et~al.} 2024,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad4cea}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...970...68L}{970, 68}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Lyu} {et~al.}(2023){Lyu}, {Peng}, {Jing}, {Yang}, {Ho}, {Renzini},\n {Wang}, {Wang}, {Xu}, {Zhao}, {Dou}, {Gu}, {Maiolino}, {Mannucci}, \\&\n {Yuan}}]{Lyu2023}\n{Lyu}, C., {Peng}, Y., {Jing}, Y., {et~al.} 2023,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad036b}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...959....5L}{959, 5}\n\n\\bibitem[{{McCracken} {et~al.}(2008){McCracken}, {Ilbert}, {Mellier}, {Bertin},\n {Guzzo}, {Arnouts}, {Le F{\\`e}vre}, \\& {Zamorani}}]{McCracken2008}\n{McCracken}, H.~J., {Ilbert}, O., {Mellier}, Y., {et~al.} 2008,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20078636}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...479..321M}{479, 321}\n\n\\bibitem[{{More} {et~al.}(2011){More}, {van den Bosch}, {Cacciato}, {Skibba},\n {Mo}, \\& {Yang}}]{More2011}\n{More}, S., {van den Bosch}, F.~C., {Cacciato}, M., {et~al.} 2011,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17436.x}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.410..210M}{410, 210}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Moutard} {et~al.}(2018){Moutard}, {Sawicki}, {Arnouts}, {Golob},\n {Malavasi}, {Adami}, {Coupon}, \\& {Ilbert}}]{Moutard2018}\n{Moutard}, T., {Sawicki}, M., {Arnouts}, S., {et~al.} 2018,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1543}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.2147M}{479, 2147}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Navarro} {et~al.}(1997){Navarro}, {Frenk}, \\& {White}}]{NFW1997}\n{Navarro}, J.~F., {Frenk}, C.~S., \\& {White}, S. D.~M. 1997,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/304888}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...490..493N}{490, 493}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Oke} \\& {Gunn}(1983)}]{OkeGunn1983_ABmag}\n{Oke}, J.~B. \\& {Gunn}, J.~E. 1983,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/160817}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...266..713O}{266, 713}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Oyarz{\\'u}n} {et~al.}(2024){Oyarz{\\'u}n}, {Tinker}, {Bundy},\n {Xhakaj}, \\& {Wyithe}}]{Oyarzun2024}\n{Oyarz{\\'u}n}, G.~A., {Tinker}, J.~L., {Bundy}, K., {Xhakaj}, E., \\& {Wyithe},\n J. S.~B. 2024,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad6de1}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...974...29O}{974, 29}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Pacifici} {et~al.}(2016){Pacifici}, {Kassin}, {Weiner}, {Holden},\n {Gardner}, {Faber}, {Ferguson}, {Koo}, {Primack}, {Bell}, {Dekel}, {Gawiser},\n {Giavalisco}, {Rafelski}, {Simons}, {Barro}, {Croton}, {Dav{\\'e}}, {Fontana},\n {Grogin}, {Koekemoer}, {Lee}, {Salmon}, {Somerville}, \\&\n {Behroozi}}]{Pacifici2016}\n{Pacifici}, C., {Kassin}, S.~A., {Weiner}, B.~J., {et~al.} 2016,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/79}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...832...79P}{832, 79}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Pahwa} \\& {Paranjape}(2017)}]{Pahwa2017}\n{Pahwa}, I. \\& {Paranjape}, A. 2017,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1325}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.1298P}{470, 1298}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Paquereau} {et~al.}(2025){Paquereau}, {Laigle}, {McCracken},\n {Shuntov}, {Ilbert}, {Akins}, {Allen}, {Arango-Togo}, {Berman},\n {B{\\'e}thermin}, {Casey}, {McCleary}, {Dubois}, {Drakos}, {Faisst}, {Franco},\n {Harish}, {Jespersen}, {Kartaltepe}, {Koekemoer}, {Kokorev}, {Lambrides},\n {Larson}, {Liu}, {Le Borgne}, {Lewis}, {McKinney}, {Mercier}, {Rhodes},\n {Robertson}, {Toft}, {Trebitsch}, {Tresse}, \\& {Weaver}}]{Paquereau2025}\n{Paquereau}, L., {Laigle}, C., {McCracken}, H.~J., {et~al.} 2025,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202553828}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...702A.163P}{702, A163}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Peng} {et~al.}(2015){Peng}, {Maiolino}, \\& {Cochrane}}]{Peng2015}\n{Peng}, Y., {Maiolino}, R., \\& {Cochrane}, R. 2015,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14439}{\\color{blue}\\nat},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Natur.521..192P}{521, 192}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Peng} {et~al.}(2010){Peng}, {Lilly}, {Kova{\\v{c}}}, {Bolzonella},\n {Pozzetti}, {Renzini}, {Zamorani}, {Ilbert}, {Knobel}, {Iovino}, {Maier},\n {Cucciati}, {Tasca}, {Carollo}, {Silverman}, {Kampczyk}, {de Ravel},\n {Sanders}, {Scoville}, {Contini}, {Mainieri}, {Scodeggio}, {Kneib}, {Le\n F{\\`e}vre}, {Bardelli}, {Bongiorno}, {Caputi}, {Coppa}, {de la Torre},\n {Franzetti}, {Garilli}, {Lamareille}, {Le Borgne}, {Le Brun}, {Mignoli},\n {Perez Montero}, {Pello}, {Ricciardelli}, {Tanaka}, {Tresse}, {Vergani},\n {Welikala}, {Zucca}, {Oesch}, {Abbas}, {Barnes}, {Bordoloi}, {Bottini},\n {Cappi}, {Cassata}, {Cimatti}, {Fumana}, {Hasinger}, {Koekemoer},\n {Leauthaud}, {Maccagni}, {Marinoni}, {McCracken}, {Memeo}, {Meneux}, {Nair},\n {Porciani}, {Presotto}, \\& {Scaramella}}]{Peng2010}\n{Peng}, Y.-j., {Lilly}, S.~J., {Kova{\\v{c}}}, K., {et~al.} 2010,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/193}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...721..193P}{721, 193}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Planck Collaboration} {et~al.}(2020){Planck Collaboration},\n {Aghanim}, {Akrami}, {Ashdown}, {Aumont}, {Baccigalupi}, {Ballardini},\n {Banday}, {Barreiro}, {Bartolo}, {Basak}, {Battye}, {Benabed}, {Bernard},\n {Bersanelli}, {Bielewicz}, {Bock}, {Bond}, {Borrill}, {Bouchet}, {Boulanger},\n {Bucher}, {Burigana}, {Butler}, {Calabrese}, {Cardoso}, {Carron},\n {Challinor}, {Chiang}, {Chluba}, {Colombo}, {Combet}, {Contreras}, {Crill},\n {Cuttaia}, {de Bernardis}, {de Zotti}, {Delabrouille}, {Delouis}, {Di\n Valentino}, {Diego}, {Dor{\\'e}}, {Douspis}, {Ducout}, {Dupac}, {Dusini},\n {Efstathiou}, {Elsner}, {En{\\ss}lin}, {Eriksen}, {Fantaye}, {Farhang},\n {Fergusson}, {Fernandez-Cobos}, {Finelli}, {Forastieri}, {Frailis},\n {Fraisse}, {Franceschi}, {Frolov}, {Galeotta}, {Galli}, {Ganga},\n {G{\\'e}nova-Santos}, {Gerbino}, {Ghosh}, {Gonz{\\'a}lez-Nuevo}, {G{\\'o}rski},\n {Gratton}, {Gruppuso}, {Gudmundsson}, {Hamann}, {Handley}, {Hansen},\n {Herranz}, {Hildebrandt}, {Hivon}, {Huang}, {Jaffe}, {Jones}, {Karakci},\n {Keih{\\\"a}nen}, {Keskitalo}, {Kiiveri}, {Kim}, {Kisner}, {Knox},\n {Krachmalnicoff}, {Kunz}, {Kurki-Suonio}, {Lagache}, {Lamarre}, {Lasenby},\n {Lattanzi}, {Lawrence}, {Le Jeune}, {Lemos}, {Lesgourgues}, {Levrier},\n {Lewis}, {Liguori}, {Lilje}, {Lilley}, {Lindholm}, {L{\\'o}pez-Caniego},\n {Lubin}, {Ma}, {Mac{\\'\\i}as-P{\\'e}rez}, {Maggio}, {Maino}, {Mandolesi},\n {Mangilli}, {Marcos-Caballero}, {Maris}, {Martin}, {Martinelli},\n {Mart{\\'\\i}nez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, {Matarrese}, {Mauri}, {McEwen}, {Meinhold},\n {Melchiorri}, {Mennella}, {Migliaccio}, {Millea}, {Mitra},\n {Miville-Desch{\\^e}nes}, {Molinari}, {Montier}, {Morgante}, {Moss}, {Natoli},\n {N{\\o}rgaard-Nielsen}, {Pagano}, {Paoletti}, {Partridge}, {Patanchon},\n {Peiris}, {Perrotta}, {Pettorino}, {Piacentini}, {Polastri}, {Polenta},\n {Puget}, {Rachen}, {Reinecke}, {Remazeilles}, {Renzi}, {Rocha}, {Rosset},\n {Roudier}, {Rubi{\\~n}o-Mart{\\'\\i}n}, {Ruiz-Granados}, {Salvati}, {Sandri},\n {Savelainen}, {Scott}, {Shellard}, {Sirignano}, {Sirri}, {Spencer},\n {Sunyaev}, {Suur-Uski}, {Tauber}, {Tavagnacco}, {Tenti}, {Toffolatti},\n {Tomasi}, {Trombetti}, {Valenziano}, {Valiviita}, {Van Tent}, {Vibert},\n {Vielva}, {Villa}, {Vittorio}, {Wandelt}, {Wehus}, {White}, {White},\n {Zacchei}, \\& {Zonca}}]{Planck18}\n{Planck Collaboration}, {Aghanim}, N., {Akrami}, Y., {et~al.} 2020,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...641A...6P}{641, A6}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Pozzetti} {et~al.}(2010){Pozzetti}, {Bolzonella}, {Zucca},\n {Zamorani}, {Lilly}, {Renzini}, {Moresco}, {Mignoli}, {Cassata}, {Tasca},\n {Lamareille}, {Maier}, {Meneux}, {Halliday}, {Oesch}, {Vergani}, {Caputi},\n {Kova{\\v{c}}}, {Cimatti}, {Cucciati}, {Iovino}, {Peng}, {Carollo}, {Contini},\n {Kneib}, {Le F{\\'e}vre}, {Mainieri}, {Scodeggio}, {Bardelli}, {Bongiorno},\n {Coppa}, {de la Torre}, {de Ravel}, {Franzetti}, {Garilli}, {Kampczyk},\n {Knobel}, {Le Borgne}, {Le Brun}, {Pell{\\`o}}, {Perez Montero},\n {Ricciardelli}, {Silverman}, {Tanaka}, {Tresse}, {Abbas}, {Bottini}, {Cappi},\n {Guzzo}, {Koekemoer}, {Leauthaud}, {Maccagni}, {Marinoni}, {McCracken},\n {Memeo}, {Porciani}, {Scaramella}, {Scarlata}, \\& {Scoville}}]{Pozzetti10}\n{Pozzetti}, L., {Bolzonella}, M., {Zucca}, E., {et~al.} 2010,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913020}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...523A..13P}{523, A13}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Roche} \\& {Eales}(1999)}]{RocheEales99}\n{Roche}, N. \\& {Eales}, S.~A. 1999,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02652.x}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.307..703R}{307, 703}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Rodr{\\'\\i}guez-Puebla} {et~al.}(2015){Rodr{\\'\\i}guez-Puebla},\n {Avila-Reese}, {Yang}, {Foucaud}, {Drory}, \\& {Jing}}]{RodriguezPuebla2015}\n{Rodr{\\'\\i}guez-Puebla}, A., {Avila-Reese}, V., {Yang}, X., {et~al.} 2015,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/130}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...799..130R}{799, 130}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Sato} {et~al.}(2014){Sato}, {Sawicki}, \\& {Arcila-Osejo}}]{Sato2014}\n{Sato}, T., {Sawicki}, M., \\& {Arcila-Osejo}, L. 2014,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1356}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.443.2661S}{443, 2661}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Schechter}(1976)}]{Schechter1976}\n{Schechter}, P. 1976,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/154079}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...203..297S}{203, 297}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Scognamiglio} {et~al.}(2026){Scognamiglio}, {Leroy}, {Harvey},\n {Massey}, {Rhodes}, {Akins}, {Brinch}, {Berman}, {Casey}, {Drakos}, {Faisst},\n {Franco}, {Fung}, {Gozaliasl}, {He}, {Hatamnia}, {Huff}, {Hogg}, {Ilbert},\n {Kartaltepe}, {Koekemoer}, {Jin}, {Lambrides}, {Leauthaud}, {Lentz}, {Liu},\n {Mahler}, {Maraston}, {Martin}, {McCleary}, {Nightingale}, {Mobasher},\n {Paquereau}, {Pires}, {Robertson}, {Sanders}, {Scarlata}, {Shuntov}, {Toni},\n {von Wietersheim-Kramsta}, \\& {Weaver}}]{Scognamiglio2026}\n{Scognamiglio}, D., {Leroy}, G., {Harvey}, D., {et~al.} 2026,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41550-025-02763-9}{\\color{blue}Nature\n Astronomy}\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026NatAs.tmp...25S}{[\\eprint[arXiv]{2601.17239}]}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Shi} {et~al.}(2024){Shi}, {Malavasi}, {Toshikawa}, \\&\n {Zheng}}]{Shi2024}\n{Shi}, K., {Malavasi}, N., {Toshikawa}, J., \\& {Zheng}, X. 2024,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad11d7}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961...39S}{961, 39}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Shuntov} {et~al.}(2025){Shuntov}, {Akins}, {Paquereau}, {Casey},\n {Ilbert}, {Arango-Toro}, {McCracken}, {Franco}, {Harish}, {Kartaltepe},\n {Koekemoer}, {Yang}, {Huertas-Company}, {Berman}, {McCleary}, {Toft},\n {Gavazzi}, {Achenbach}, {Bertin}, {Brinch}, {Champagne}, {Chartab}, {Drakos},\n {Egami}, {Endsley}, {Faisst}, {Fan}, {Flayhart}, {Hartley}, {Hatamnia},\n {Gozaliasl}, {Gentile}, {Jermann}, {Jin}, {Kakiichi}, {Khostovan},\n {K{\\\"u}mmel}, {Laigle}, {Laishram}, {Lambrides}, {Liu}, {Lyu}, {Magdis},\n {Mobasher}, {Moutard}, {Renzini}, {Rich}, {Sanders}, {Sattari}, {Robertson},\n {Schefer}, {Scognamiglio}, {Scoville}, {Silverman}, {Taamoli},\n {Trakhtenbrot}, {Valentino}, {Wang}, {Weaver}, \\& {Yang}}]{Shuntov2025d}\n{Shuntov}, M., {Akins}, H.~B., {Paquereau}, L., {et~al.} 2025,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202555799}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...704A.339S}{704, A339}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Shuntov} {et~al.}(2026){Shuntov}, {Ilbert}, {Lagos}, {Toft},\n {Valentino}, {Mercier}, {Akins}, {Binh}, {Brinch}, {Casey}, {Franco},\n {Gentile}, {Gozaliasl}, {Haghjoo}, {Harish}, {Hirschmann}, {Huertas-Company},\n {Jin}, {Kartaltepe}, {Koekemoer}, {Laigle}, {Lewis}, {Magdis}, {Joy\n McCracken}, {Mobasher}, {Moutard}, {Oesch}, {Paquereau}, {Renzini}, {Rich},\n {Sanders}, {Toni}, {Tresse}, {Weibel}, {Weaver}, \\& {Yang}}]{Shuntov2026b}\n{Shuntov}, M., {Ilbert}, O., {Lagos}, C. d.~P., {et~al.} 2026,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202558022}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026A&A...707A.391S}{707, A391}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Singh} {et~al.}(2025){Singh}, {Guaita}, {Hibon}, {H{\\\"a}u{\\ss}ler},\n {Lee}, {Ramakrishnan}, {Kumar}, {Padilla}, {Firestone}, {Song}, {Artale},\n {Hwang}, {Iribarren}, {Gronwall}, {Gawiser}, {Nantais}, {Valdes}, {Park}, \\&\n {Yang}}]{Singh2025}\n{Singh}, A., {Guaita}, L., {Hibon}, P., {et~al.} 2025,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452406}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...700A..68S}{700, A68}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Song} {et~al.}(2021){Song}, {Laigle}, {Hwang}, {Devriendt},\n {Dubois}, {Kraljic}, {Pichon}, {Slyz}, \\& {Smith}}]{Song2021}\n{Song}, H., {Laigle}, C., {Hwang}, H.~S., {et~al.} 2021,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3981}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.4635S}{501, 4635}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Sun} {et~al.}(2018){Sun}, {Guo}, {Wang}, {Lacey}, {Wang}, {Gao}, \\&\n {Pan}}]{Sun2018}\n{Sun}, S., {Guo}, Q., {Wang}, L., {et~al.} 2018,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty832}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.3136S}{477, 3136}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Taamoli} {et~al.}(2024){Taamoli}, {Mobasher}, {Chartab}, {Darvish},\n {Weaver}, {Hemmati}, {Casey}, {Sattari}, {Brammer}, {Capak}, {Ilbert},\n {Kartaltepe}, {McCracken}, {Moneti}, {Sanders}, {Scoville}, {Steinhardt}, \\&\n {Toft}}]{Taamoli2024}\n{Taamoli}, S., {Mobasher}, B., {Chartab}, N., {et~al.} 2024,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad32c5}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...966...18T}{966, 18}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Tacchella} {et~al.}(2019){Tacchella}, {Diemer}, {Hernquist},\n {Genel}, {Marinacci}, {Nelson}, {Pillepich}, {Rodriguez-Gomez}, {Sales},\n {Springel}, \\& {Vogelsberger}}]{Tacchella2019}\n{Tacchella}, S., {Diemer}, B., {Hernquist}, L., {et~al.} 2019,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1657}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.5416T}{487, 5416}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Tinker} {et~al.}(2018){Tinker}, {Hahn}, {Mao}, {Wetzel}, \\&\n {Conroy}}]{Tinker2018a}\n{Tinker}, J.~L., {Hahn}, C., {Mao}, Y.-Y., {Wetzel}, A.~R., \\& {Conroy}, C.\n 2018, \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty666}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477..935T}{477, 935}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Tinker} {et~al.}(2013){Tinker}, {Leauthaud}, {Bundy}, {George},\n {Behroozi}, {Massey}, {Rhodes}, \\& {Wechsler}}]{Tinker2013}\n{Tinker}, J.~L., {Leauthaud}, A., {Bundy}, K., {et~al.} 2013,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/93}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...778...93T}{778, 93}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Tojeiro} \\& {Kraljic}(2025)}]{Tojeiro&Kraljic2025}\n{Tojeiro}, R. \\& {Kraljic}, K. 2025,\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250321759T}{\\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.21759}{\\color{blue}arXiv\n e-prints}, arXiv:2503.21759}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Toni} {et~al.}(2026{\\natexlab{a}}){Toni}, {Castignani}, {Combes},\n {Salom{\\'e}}, {Bongiovanni}, {Moscardini}, \\& {Maturi}}]{Toni2026}\n{Toni}, G., {Castignani}, G., {Combes}, F., {et~al.} 2026{\\natexlab{a}},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260521592T}{\\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.21592}{\\color{blue}arXiv\n e-prints}, arXiv:2605.21592}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Toni} {et~al.}(2025){Toni}, {Gozaliasl}, {Maturi}, {Moscardini},\n {Finoguenov}, {Castignani}, {Gentile}, {Virolainen}, {Casey}, {Kartaltepe},\n {Akins}, {Allen}, {Arango-Toro}, {Babul}, {Brinch}, {Drakos}, {Faisst},\n {Franco}, {Griffiths}, {Harish}, {Hasinger}, {Ilbert}, {Jin}, {Khostovan},\n {Koekemoer}, {Korpi-Lagg}, {Larson}, {Lertprasertpong}, {Liu}, {Magdis},\n {Massey}, {McCracken}, {McKinney}, {Paquereau}, {Rhodes}, {Robertson},\n {Sargent}, {Shuntov}, {Tanaka}, {Taamoli}, {Tempel}, {Toft}, {Vardoulaki}, \\&\n {Yang}}]{Toni2025}\n{Toni}, G., {Gozaliasl}, G., {Maturi}, M., {et~al.} 2025,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202553759}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...697A.197T}{697, A197}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Toni} {et~al.}(2026{\\natexlab{b}}){Toni}, {Maturi}, {Castignani},\n {Moscardini}, {Gozaliasl}, {Finoguenov}, {Taamoli}, {Gentile}, {Akins},\n {Arango-Toro}, {Casey}, {Drakos}, {Faisst}, {Flayhart}, {Franco}, {Hadi},\n {Haghjoo}, {Harish}, {Hatamnia}, {Ilbert}, {Jin}, {Kartaltepe}, {Khostovan},\n {Koekemoer}, {Leroy}, {Magdis}, {McCracken}, {McKinney}, {Paquereau},\n {Rhodes}, {Rich}, {Robertson}, {Samir}, {Scognamiglio}, {Shamyati},\n {Shuntov}, \\& {Zavala}}]{Toni2026a}\n{Toni}, G., {Maturi}, M., {Castignani}, G., {et~al.} 2026{\\natexlab{b}},\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202557183}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026A&A...707A..87T}{707, A87}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Toni} {et~al.}(2024){Toni}, {Maturi}, {Finoguenov}, {Moscardini}, \\&\n {Castignani}}]{Toni2024}\n{Toni}, G., {Maturi}, M., {Finoguenov}, A., {Moscardini}, L., \\& {Castignani},\n G. 2024,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348832}{\\color{blue}\\aap},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...687A..56T}{687, A56}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Treyer} {et~al.}(2018){Treyer}, {Kraljic}, {Arnouts}, {de la Torre},\n {Pichon}, {Dubois}, {Vibert}, {Milliard}, {Laigle}, {Seibert}, {Brown},\n {Grootes}, {Wright}, {Liske}, {Lara-Lopez}, \\& {Bland-Hawthorn}}]{Treyer2018}\n{Treyer}, M., {Kraljic}, K., {Arnouts}, S., {et~al.} 2018,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty769}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.2684T}{477, 2684}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Valentino} {et~al.}(2020){Valentino}, {Tanaka}, {Davidzon}, {Toft},\n {G{\\'o}mez-Guijarro}, {Stockmann}, {Onodera}, {Brammer}, {Ceverino},\n {Faisst}, {Gallazzi}, {Hayward}, {Ilbert}, {Kubo}, {Magdis}, {Selsing},\n {Shimakawa}, {Sparre}, {Steinhardt}, {Yabe}, \\& {Zabl}}]{Valentino2020}\n{Valentino}, F., {Tanaka}, M., {Davidzon}, I., {et~al.} 2020,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab64dc}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...889...93V}{889, 93}\n\n\\bibitem[{{van den Bosch} {et~al.}(2003){van den Bosch}, {Yang}, \\&\n {Mo}}]{vandenBosch2003}\n{van den Bosch}, F.~C., {Yang}, X., \\& {Mo}, H.~J. 2003,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06335.x}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.340..771V}{340, 771}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Wang} {et~al.}(2022){Wang}, {Mao}, {Zentner}, {Guo}, {Lange}, {van\n den Bosch}, \\& {Mezini}}]{Wang2022}\n{Wang}, K., {Mao}, Y.-Y., {Zentner}, A.~R., {et~al.} 2022,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2465}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.4003W}{516, 4003}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Wang} {et~al.}(2026){Wang}, {Schaye}, {Ben{\\'\\i}tez-Llambay},\n {Chaikin}, {Frenk}, {Hu{\\v{s}}ko}, {McGibbon}, {Ploeckinger}, {Richings},\n {Schaller}, \\& {Trayford}}]{Wang2026}\n{Wang}, K., {Schaye}, J., {Ben{\\'\\i}tez-Llambay}, A., {et~al.} 2026,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag110}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026MNRAS.546ag110W}{546, stag110}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Wang} \\& {White}(2012)}]{Wang&White2012}\n{Wang}, W. \\& {White}, S. D.~M. 2012,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21256.x}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.424.2574W}{424, 2574}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Watson} {et~al.}(2015){Watson}, {Hearin}, {Berlind}, {Becker},\n {Behroozi}, {Skibba}, {Reyes}, {Zentner}, \\& {van den Bosch}}]{Watson2015}\n{Watson}, D.~F., {Hearin}, A.~P., {Berlind}, A.~A., {et~al.} 2015,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2065}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.446..651W}{446, 651}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Wechsler} \\& {Tinker}(2018)}]{Wechsler&Tinker2018}\n{Wechsler}, R.~H. \\& {Tinker}, J.~L. 2018,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051756}{\\color{blue}\\araa},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ARA&A..56..435W}{56, 435}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Weinmann} {et~al.}(2006){Weinmann}, {van den Bosch}, {Yang}, \\&\n {Mo}}]{Weinmann2006}\n{Weinmann}, S.~M., {van den Bosch}, F.~C., {Yang}, X., \\& {Mo}, H.~J. 2006,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09865.x}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.366....2W}{366, 2}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Wetzel} {et~al.}(2012){Wetzel}, {Tinker}, \\& {Conroy}}]{Wetzel2012}\n{Wetzel}, A.~R., {Tinker}, J.~L., \\& {Conroy}, C. 2012,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21188.x}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.424..232W}{424, 232}\n\n\\bibitem[{{White} \\& {Rees}(1978)}]{White&Rees1978}\n{White}, S.~D.~M. \\& {Rees}, M.~J. 1978,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/183.3.341}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978MNRAS.183..341W}{183, 341}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Williams} {et~al.}(2009){Williams}, {Quadri}, {Franx}, {van Dokkum},\n \\& {Labb{\\'e}}}]{Williams2009}\n{Williams}, R.~J., {Quadri}, R.~F., {Franx}, M., {van Dokkum}, P., \\&\n {Labb{\\'e}}, I. 2009,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/691/2/1879}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...691.1879W}{691, 1879}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Zaidi} {et~al.}(2026){Zaidi}, {Wake}, {Marchesini}, {Iyer},\n {Muzzin}, {Papovich}, {Antwi-Danso}, {Glazebrook}, \\&\n {Labb{\\'e}}}]{Zaidi2024}\n{Zaidi}, K., {Wake}, D.~A., {Marchesini}, D., {et~al.} 2026,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae6b7d}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ..1004...96Z}{1004, 96}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Zehavi} {et~al.}(2011){Zehavi}, {Zheng}, {Weinberg}, {Blanton},\n {Bahcall}, {Berlind}, {Brinkmann}, {Frieman}, {Gunn}, {Lupton}, {Nichol},\n {Percival}, {Schneider}, {Skibba}, {Strauss}, {Tegmark}, \\&\n {York}}]{Zehavi2011}\n{Zehavi}, I., {Zheng}, Z., {Weinberg}, D.~H., {et~al.} 2011,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/59}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...736...59Z}{736, 59}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Zehavi} {et~al.}(2005){Zehavi}, {Zheng}, {Weinberg}, {Frieman},\n {Berlind}, {Blanton}, {Scoccimarro}, {Sheth}, {Strauss}, {Kayo}, {Suto},\n {Fukugita}, {Nakamura}, {Bahcall}, {Brinkmann}, {Gunn}, {Hennessy},\n {Ivezi{\\'c}}, {Knapp}, {Loveday}, {Meiksin}, {Schlegel}, {Schneider},\n {Szapudi}, {Tegmark}, {Vogeley}, {York}, \\& {SDSS\n Collaboration}}]{Zehavi2005}\n{Zehavi}, I., {Zheng}, Z., {Weinberg}, D.~H., {et~al.} 2005,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/431891}{\\color{blue}\\apj},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...630....1Z}{630, 1}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Zentner} {et~al.}(2019){Zentner}, {Hearin}, {van den Bosch},\n {Lange}, \\& {Villarreal}}]{Zentner2019}\n{Zentner}, A.~R., {Hearin}, A., {van den Bosch}, F.~C., {Lange}, J.~U., \\&\n {Villarreal}, A.~S. 2019,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz470}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.1196Z}{485, 1196}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Zentner} {et~al.}(2014){Zentner}, {Hearin}, \\& {van den\n Bosch}}]{Zentner2014}\n{Zentner}, A.~R., {Hearin}, A.~P., \\& {van den Bosch}, F.~C. 2014,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1383}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.443.3044Z}{443, 3044}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Zu} \\& {Mandelbaum}(2016)}]{Zu&Mandelbaum2016}\n{Zu}, Y. \\& {Mandelbaum}, R. 2016,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw221}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457.4360Z}{457, 4360}\n\n\\bibitem[{{Zu} \\& {Mandelbaum}(2018)}]{Zu&Mandelbaum2018}\n{Zu}, Y. \\& {Mandelbaum}, R. 2018,\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty279}{\\color{blue}\\mnras},\n \\href{https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.1637Z}{476, 1637}\n\n\\end{thebibliography}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[longauth]{aa}\n\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{txfonts}\n\\usepackage{lipsum}\n\\usepackage{lscape}\n\\usepackage{placeins}\n\\usepackage{natbib} \n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\hypersetup{colorlinks=true, linkcolor=blue, citecolor=blue, filecolor=blue, urlcolor=blue}\n\\bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}\n\\usepackage{afterpage}\n\\usepackage{siunitx}\n\\usepackage{array}\n\\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}\n\\usepackage[varvw]{newtxmath}\n\\usepackage{stfloats}\n\\DeclareUnicodeCharacter{2212}{-}\n\\usepackage{xspace}\n\\usepackage[dvipsnames]{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{cancel}\n\\usepackage{bm}\n\\usepackage{float}\n\\FloatBarrier\n\\usepackage{shortcuts}\n\n\\begin{document}\n \n \\title{COSMOS-Web: does halo mass alone shape the clustering of star-forming and quiescent galaxies?}\n \n \\author{\n L.~Paquereau\\inst{\\ref{Chalmers}}\n \\and C.~Laigle\\inst{\\ref{IAP}}\n \\and H.~J.~McCracken\\inst{\\ref{IAP}}\n \\and O.~Ilbert \\inst{\\ref{LAM}}\n \\and H.~B.~Akins\\inst{\\ref{UAT}}\n \\and R.~Arango-Togo \\inst{\\ref{IAP}}\n \\and N.~Bình \\inst{\\ref{seattle}}\n \\and C.~M.~Casey\\inst{\\ref{SantaB},\\ref{DAWN}}\n \\and Y.~Dubois\\inst{\\ref{IAP}}\n \\and M.~Franco\\inst{\\ref{CEA}}\n \\and G.~Gozaliasl \\inst{\\ref{finland2},\\ref{finland}}\n \\and S.~Harish\\inst{\\ref{STScI},\\ref{Rochester}}\n \\and M.~Hirschmann\\inst{\\ref{EPFL},\\ref{trieste}}\n \\and B.~Jego\\inst{\\ref{Strasbourg}}\n \\and A.~Kaminsky\\inst{\\ref{miami}}\n \\and J.~S.~Kartaltepe\\inst{\\ref{Rochester}}\n \\and A.~M.~Koekemoer\\inst{\\ref{STScI}}\n \\and D.~Le Borgne\\inst{\\ref{IAP}}\n \\and J.~S.~W.~Lewis\\inst{\\ref{CEA}}\n \\and D.~Liu\\inst{\\ref{Nanjing}}\n \\and G.~E.~Magdis \\inst{\\ref{DAWN},\\ref{NBI},\\ref{lyngby}}\n \\and J.~McKinney\\inst{\\ref{UAT}}\n \\and W.~Mercier \\inst{\\ref{LAM}}\n \\and L.~Moscardini \\inst{\\ref{Bologna},\\ref{INAF-Bologna},\\ref{INFN_bologna}}\n \\and T.~Moutard\\inst{\\ref{ESA}}\n \\and J.~D.~Rhodes\\inst{\\ref{NASAJPL}}\n \\and B.~E.~Robertson\\inst{\\ref{UnivCalifornia}}\n \\and S.~Sanjaripour\\inst{\\ref{riverside}}\n \\and M.~Shuntov\\inst{\\ref{DAWN},\\ref{NBI}}\n \\and G.~Toni\\inst{\\ref{Bologna},\\ref{INAF-Bologna},\\ref{Heidelberg}}\n \\and M.~Trebitsch\\inst{\\ref{MeudonLUX}}\n \\and L.~Tresse\\inst{\\ref{LAM}}\n }\n\n \\institute{\n Department of Physics and Astronomy, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden \\label{Chalmers}\n \\and Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, UMR 7095, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, 98 bis boulevard Arago, F-75014 Paris, France\\label{IAP}\n \\and Aix Marseille University, CNRS, CNES, LAM, Marseille, France\\label{LAM}\n \\and Department of Astronomy, The University of Texas at Austin, 2515 Speedway Blvd Stop C1400, Austin, TX 78712, USA \\label{UAT}\n \\and Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA \\label{seattle}\n \\and Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA\\label{SantaB}\n \\and Cosmic Dawn Center (DAWN), Denmark\\label{DAWN}\n \\and Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris Cité, CEA, CNRS, AIM, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France\\label{CEA}\n \\and Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, P.O. Box 15400, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland \\label{finland2}\n \\and Department of Physics, University of, P.O. Box 64, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland \\label{finland}\n \\and Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA\\label{STScI}\n \\and Laboratory for Multiwavelength Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, Rochester Institute of Technology, 84 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623, USA\\label{Rochester}\n \\and Institute of Physics, GalSpec, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Observatoire de Sauverny, Chemin Pegasi 51, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland \\label{EPFL}\n \\and INAF, Astronomical Observatory of Trieste, Via Tiepolo 11, 34131 Trieste, Italy \\label{trieste}\n \\and Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Observatoire astronomique de Strasbourg, UMR 7550, 67000 Strasbourg, France \\label{Strasbourg}\n \\and Department of Physics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA \\label{miami}\n \\and Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 10 Yuanhua Road, Nanjing 210023, China \\label{Nanjing}\n \\and Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 128, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark \\label{NBI}\n \\and DTU-Space, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej 327, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark \\label{lyngby}\n \\and Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna - Department of Physics and Astronomy \"Augusto Righi\" (DIFA), Via Gobetti 93/2, I-40129 Bologna, Italy \\label{Bologna} \n \\and INAF–Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio, Via Gobetti 93/3, I-40129, Bologna, Italy \\label{INAF-Bologna} \n \\and INFN- Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, I-40127 Bologna, Italy \\label{INFN_bologna}\n \\and European Space Agency (ESA), European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC), Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, 28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain \\label{ESA}\n \\and Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109\\label{NASAJPL}\n \\and Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA\\label{UnivCalifornia}\n \\and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA \\label{riverside}\n \\and Zentrum f\\\"{u}r Astronomie, Universit\\\"{a}t Heidelberg, Philosophenweg 12, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany \\label{Heidelberg}\n \\and LUX, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 75014 Paris, France \\label{MeudonLUX}\n }\n\n \\date{Received; accepted}\n\n\\abstract{ \nWhile stellar mass correlates strongly with halo mass, it remains unclear whether halo mass alone governs galaxy star-formation activity, or whether secondary halo properties and environment also play a role. We investigate these effects beyond halo mass by measuring the auto- and cross-correlations of star-forming and quiescent galaxies in the COSMOS-Web survey from $z = 5$ to the present day. To isolate environmental contributions, we introduce a method that matches the halo mass distributions of both populations using the \\textsc{UniverseMachine} model. We find that quiescent galaxies remain more strongly clustered than star-forming systems by at least $0.5-1$ dex at all redshifts, even after controlling for halo mass. At $z \\le 2$, this excess clustering increases towards lower stellar masses, with the most clustered objects being $\\log(M_\\star/{\\rm M}_\\odot) \\le 9.5$ quiescent galaxies. This points to environmental quenching significantly affecting low-mass galaxies at $z \\le 2$, likely driven by ram-pressure stripping or the suppression of cold gas accretion, as these objects show disky morphologies. Cross-correlations further reveal one-halo conformity up to $z \\simeq 2$: low-mass (or satellite) quiescent galaxies are more strongly clustered around massive (or central) quiescent galaxies than around star-forming centrals of the same halo mass. This signal may arise from quenching mechanisms affecting both centrals and satellites, correlated assembly histories prior to infall, or dependencies on secondary halo properties. Both environmental quenching and conformity appear to vanish between $z \\simeq 5$ and $2$. Together, these results challenge the common assumption that clustering and star-formation activity depend solely on halo mass.\n}\n\n\\keywords{Galaxies: evolution -- Galaxies: statistics -- Galaxies: halos -- Galaxies: star formation}\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\\section{Introduction} \\label{sec:intro}\n\nA tight relationship exists between halo mass and galaxy stellar mass assembly, as evidenced by measurements of the stellar-to-halo mass ratio (SHMR) over time \\citep[\\eg][]{White&Rees1978,Wechsler&Tinker2018}. This connection is therefore expected to play a role in the cessation of star formation, known as quenching. For instance, \\cite{Dekel2006} suggests a critical halo mass $M_{\\rm h} \\simeq 10^{12}\\,{\\rm M}_\\odot$ above which cold gas filaments cannot penetrate the halo any more because of gravitational shocks at the halo virial radius $-$ a mass scale which also corresponds to where active galactic nuclei (AGN) feedback is thought to quench galaxies \\citep[\\eg][]{Croton2006, Bower2006, Cattaneo2006}. Observations reveal that halos of this mass or greater host a higher proportion of passive galaxies, along with an increased fraction of satellite galaxies \\citep{vandenBosch2003}. Such trends are empirically modelled as a function of halo mass by \\cite{Peng2010}: it separates the ``mass quenching'', which primarily affects central galaxies through internal processes like AGN activity; versus the ``environmental quenching'', that mainly impacts satellites in massive halos (via ram-pressure stripping, gas depletion, etc.; \\eg \\citealt{Gunn&Gott1972, Dressler1980, Farouki&Shapiro1981, Peng2015}) or results from large-scale effects (differences in gas properties and accretion depending on the location in the cosmic web, \\eg \\citealt{Laigle2018, Song2021, Tojeiro&Kraljic2025}). \n\nBoth effects are believed to drive the strong correlation of galaxy clustering (being the two-point correlation function of galaxy positions) with galaxy properties, such as colour or star formation rate (SFR). Redder galaxies are observed more clustered than their bluer counterparts \\citep[\\eg][]{Zehavi2005,Tinker2013,Berti2021}. This occurs primarily because quiescent galaxies (QGs) tend to reside in more massive halos and represent a larger fraction of satellites than star-forming galaxies (SFGs), enhancing their overall clustering. \n\nHowever, questions remain regarding environmental quenching and the evolution of its impact over time, especially since most statistical studies have been limited to $z < 3$. While correlations between star formation activity and various definitions of environment have been identified, some of these are contradictory, and establishing causality is challenging. For instance, some studies at $z \\sim 1$ find that SFRs can be enhanced in locally overdense regions where gas can be more readily replenished \\citep{Darvish2014}, while others suggest the opposite \\citep{Peng2010, Wetzel2012}. Moreover, there is no consensus regarding the relative differences between the SHMR of QGs and SFGs \\citep[\\eg][]{More2011, RodriguezPuebla2015, Zu&Mandelbaum2016}. Isolating secondary environmental effects at fixed halo mass is complex, as measuring halo masses in observational data requires indirect modelling and strong assumptions \\citep[\\eg][]{Treyer2018}.\n\nAdditionally, it remains unclear whether secondary halo properties beyond just mass, such as halo assembly history, also influence star formation activity. If such effects exist, they might translate into the clustering of QGs and SFGs: this is what we call the ``galaxy assembly bias'' \\citep[\\eg][]{Croton2007,Zentner2014,Hearin2016b,Tinker2018a,Lyu2023}. Supporting evidence comes from \\cite{Wang2022} and \\cite{Zentner2019} for example, who argued that models assuming assembly bias based on halo concentration better reproduce their one and two-point galaxy statistics. According to \\cite{Wang2026}, the gravitational potential of more concentrated halos may reduce gas outflows, leading to an enhanced chemical enrichment and stellar mass growth. In addition, the SFR of a galaxy may be correlated with that of its central, a phenomenon known as ``conformity'' \\citep[\\eg][]{Weinmann2006,Knobel2015,Kawinwanichakij2016,Hearin2016a,Berti2017}. For instance, \\cite{Hatfield&Jarvis17} used auto- and cross-correlations up to $z = 2$ to demonstrate that lower-mass galaxies are more likely to be quenched when they are in proximity to a massive QG. Such processes may leave detectable imprints in galaxy clustering, and if significant, must be accounted for in models of the galaxy–halo connection.\n\nTherefore, the key questions driving this work are: In which environments do QGs live, across cosmic time? And does halo mass alone suffice to explain galaxies' star-formation activity and spatial distribution? We address this by measuring auto- and cross-correlations of QGs and SFGs in the COSMOS-Web survey \\citep{Casey23_CWeb}. A major strength of our approach is the use of wide and deep data from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), enabling the observation of QGs from $z = 0$ back to the earliest epochs at which they are observed \\citep[$z \\sim 5$; \\eg][]{Carnall2023, Long2024, deGraaff2025}. This study builds on the previous work by \\citealt{Paquereau2025} (hereafter \\citetalias{Paquereau2025}) which investigated the SHMR in COSMOS-Web at $z = 0.1 -12$, and found a clear evolution of the galaxy-halo connection with redshift.\n\nWe begin in \\refsec{sec:data} by describing the sample selection. After introducing the method in \\refsec{sec:method}, clustering measurements are presented in \\refsec{sec:results} for the auto-correlations of SFGs and QGs, and in \\refsec{sec:crosscorr} for cross-correlations. We then discuss the implications for quenching and the galaxy-halo connection in \\refsec{sec:discussion}, as well as the challenges of this study. Conclusions and future directions are presented in \\refsec{sec:conclusion}.\n\nThroughout this work, we adopt AB magnitudes \\citep{OkeGunn1983_ABmag} and a cosmology from \\cite{Planck18}. Stellar masses ($M_\\star$) are computed assuming a \\cite{Chabrier03} initial mass function. All logarithms in this paper are base 10.\n\n\\section{Data and sample selection} \\label{sec:data}\n\n\\subsection{The COSMOS-Web survey and catalogues} \\label{subsec:CWebsurvey}\n\nAs the largest contiguous extragalactic imaging survey conducted with JWST to date, COSMOS-Web is ideal to study the environment of galaxies across a wide range of scales and cosmic epochs. It benefits from deep high-resolution near-infrared imaging from JWST, covering an area of $0.54 \\, {\\rm deg}^2$ in the COSMOS field with a $5\\sigma$ depth of $28.1 \\, \\mathrm{mag}$ in the F444W band. This is combined with the wealth of multi-wavelength data already available in COSMOS from 0.3 to 8 $\\si{\\micro\\meter}$. From this dataset, a catalogue of over 700,000 galaxies with photometric measurements and properties has been created: COSMOS2025\\footnote{This catalogue can be accessed at \\url{https://cosmos2025.iap.fr/catalog.html}, along with the JWST mosaics and other data products as the group catalogue.} \\citep{Shuntov2025d}. Photometric redshifts have been determined using the SED fitting code \\LePHARE \\citep{Arnouts02_LP, Ilbert06_LP}, achieving a great photo-$z$ accuracy characterised by a median absolute deviation $\\sigma_{\\rm MAD} \\le 0.03$ and a median photo-$z$ uncertainty of $\\Delta z/(1+z) \\simeq 0.04$ across our redshift range. Non-parametric star formation histories and associated physical properties for all sources were derived with the code \\CIGALE \\citep{Boquien19_CIGALE, ArangoToro2024}. For a more detailed overview of COSMOS2025, one can refer to \\citetalias{Paquereau2025} and \\cite{Shuntov2025d}.\n\nAdditionally, \\cite{Toni2025} built a group catalogue up to $z \\simeq 3.7$ in COSMOS-Web. Groups are identified using the algorithm \\texttt{AMICO} \\citep[][]{Bellagamba2018}. It is a linear optimal matched filter which models galaxy density as a combination of a ``signal'' component $-$ representing the contribution of group galaxies (modelled using a \\citealt{NFW1997} profile for their distribution within halos, and a \\citealt{Schechter1976} function for their number density) $-$ and a ``noise'' component from field galaxies (modelled using the distribution of the whole sample). The algorithm seeks to determine where the signal-to-noise ratio S/N of the galaxy density is maximised. In total, 1678 candidate groups have been identified with a S/N $> 6$ and purity $P > 77\\%$, of which half are confirmed with spectroscopy or are matched with known overdensities.\n\nIn this work, we adopt the same sample cleaning procedure as in \\citetalias{Paquereau2025}, excluding stars, quasars, sources within star masks, objects fainter than $m_{\\textrm{F444W}} = 27.75$ mag, and galaxies with poorly constrained redshift probability distribution functions.\n\n\\subsubsection{Star-forming/quiescent classification} \\label{subsec:classification}\n\nThe first step of this work is to establish a classification separating galaxies actively forming stars (SFGs) and the ones that do not (QGs), which remains consistent across our $z = 0 - 5$ range. This is a challenging task, because as redshift increases, the SFG/QG bimodality becomes weaker, QGs are rarer, or may exhibit a wider variety of properties than in the local Universe \\citep[\\eg][]{Valentino2020}. \n\nWe adopt an approach that sets an evolving threshold for the galaxies' sSFR (${\\rm sSFR} = {\\rm SFR}/M_\\star$), as introduced by \\cite{Fontana2009}. It sets a certain timescale for star formation relative to the age of the Universe at the galaxy's redshift: ${\\rm sSFR} \\le \\beta \\, / \\, t_{\\rm H}(z)$ to select QGs, where $t_\\mathrm{H}(z)$ is the Hubble time. Although $\\beta$ is arbitrary, most works use $\\beta = 0.2$ \\citep[\\eg][]{Pacifici2016,Carnall2018,Tacchella2019}. It is broadly equivalent to a $UVJ$ selection and a threshold of $\\log({\\rm sSFR}/{\\rm yr}^{-1}) \\simeq -10.9$ at $z < 1$, but decreases to $-10.15$ at $z = 3.5$. We also use $\\beta = 0.2$ since it appears to best delineate our $z - \\mathrm{sSFR}$ plane, and aligns with the gradual increase of the normalisation of the main sequence (MS) with $z$. \n\nAlthough the sSFR classification depends on the SED model and may be influenced by uncertainties in redshift and physical parameter estimates, it utilises most of the available data and can be consistently applied across all redshift bins as well as in other surveys or simulations with the same prescription (which is mandatory in our case, in order to use the \\textsc{UniverseMachine} model; see \\refsubsec{subsec:massmatching}). A comparison with alternative classifications is discussed in \\refapp{app:class}.\n\n\\subsection{Completeness and bining} \\label{subsec:bins}\n\nSecondly, we construct stellar mass-complete subsamples to avoid selection biases that could distort the clustering signal. We use \\cite{Pozzetti10} formula to get the mass completeness limit for the whole sample\\footnote{The completeness limit for the whole sample is identical to that of SFGs alone, as the faintest objects of the sample are exclusively star-forming; while QGs, brighter because of their higher mass-to-light ratios, lie well above the survey magnitude limit.} (see Sect.~2.2.1 in \\citetalias{Paquereau2025}). Redshift and stellar mass bins above the completeness limit are chosen to contain at least $\\sim 100$ objects per bin and roughly the same order of magnitude for the numbers of SFGs and QGs. Redshift bin widths correspond to approximately similar cosmic timescales of $0.7-1.5$\\,Gyr (except at $z < 1$). \\reffigure{fig:completeness} presents the sample completeness, along with the bins used in this work. We also show numbers and quiescent fractions as a function of mass and redshift in \\refapp{app:numbers} and \\ref{app:fQG}. In total, the sample comprises 76506 SFGs and 8750 QGs.\n\n\\begin{figure}[h!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\columnwidth]{figures/COSMOS-Web_QTvsSF_SMcompleteness_sampleplot_v3.1.0_new.pdf}\n \\vspace{-6mm}\n \\caption{Stellar mass completeness in the $z - M_\\star$ diagram. Hexagons represent counts of QGs (with a red gradient) and SFGs (grey gradient). The redshift bins used to measure clustering with mass thresholds are indicated in the foreground.}\n \\label{fig:completeness}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Halo-mass matching} \\label{subsec:massmatching}\n\nOne of the objectives of this study is to investigate the effects beyond halo mass on galaxy clustering. Thus, we want to construct SFG and QG samples that share a similar halo mass distribution, so that any remaining clustering differences must arise from secondary effects. This is, however, a complex task because we lack direct information on this quantity. Not robustly controlling for halo mass can lead to misleading interpretations of conformity or assembly bias \\citep[\\eg][]{Calderon2018}.\n\nTo do so, we have recourse to the semi-empirical model \\UniverseMachine (hereafter \\UM; \\citealt{Behroozi19}), built in an iterative way to reproduce various $z = 0-10$ observations (stellar mass or UV luminosity functions, clustering, etc.), including from the COSMOS field. From the modelled \\UM COSMOS lightcone, we selected SFGs and QGs the same way as described in \\refsubsec{subsec:classification}. We confirmed that just matching the stellar mass distributions of SFGs with QGs is far from matching their underlying halo mass distributions: for instance, at fixed $M_\\star \\ge 10^9 \\,{\\rm M}_\\odot$, the median halo mass of QGs is 10 times higher than that of SFGs. Instead, we developed a ``halo-mass matching'' (HMM) method that makes use of \\UM to coincide QGs and SFGs halo mass distributions, following these steps:\n\\begin{enumerate}\n \\item Match the shape of stellar mass distributions of \\UM to COSMOS-Web, for both SFGs and QGs. This ensures that we have comparable populations in both the model and observations. \n \\item In \\UM, match the halo mass distributions between SFGs and QGs (previously stellar mass-matched), in terms of shape and amplitude. We return \\UM's SFGs/QGs new stellar mass distributions after this matching for the next step. \n \\item Modify the COSMOS-Web SFGs/QGs initial stellar mass distributions to match the shape of \\UM's halo mass-matched SFGs and QGs stellar mass distributions.\n\\end{enumerate}\nIn each of these steps, distributions are matched by randomly excluding sources from the samples. We repeat this HMM procedure 20 times, measuring clustering independently each time. The final signal is taken as the median over all iterations, retaining only data points with ${\\rm S/N} > 1$, and associated uncertainties are given by the quadrature sum of the median clustering error and the standard deviation across iterations. This ensures stable results: the scatter across iterations remains at most 20\\% of the median clustering uncertainty for SFGs and 40\\% for QGs. An illustration of this process can be found in \\refapp{app:HMM}.\n\n\\section{Method} \\label{sec:method}\n\nWe measure angular two-point correlation functions (ACF) $w(\\theta)$ of galaxy positions separated by an angle $\\theta$ using the formula from \\cite{LandySzalay93}. For a random distribution $R$ and two populations of number counts $D_1$ and $D_2$, the cross-correlation between the two in the bin $[\\theta, \\theta + \\delta \\theta]$ is given by:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq_ch7:crossw}\n w(\\theta) = \\frac{D_1 D_2 - D_1 R - D_2 R + RR}{RR} \\; .\n\\end{equation}\nThis becomes an auto-correlation function if $D_1 = D_2$. Following \\citetalias{Paquereau2025}, we construct the random catalogue on the same area as COSMOS-Web, accounting for the same masks, and containing about $50$ times the total number of objects in our sample.\n\nWe measure these correlations with the algorithm \\texttt{treecorr} \\citep{Jarvis_treecorr}, and errors are computed using the jackknife resampling method. It divides the area into patches ($N_{\\rm patches} = 20$ here) and calculates the covariance matrix of the ACF by removing one patch at a time. An additional source of errors comes from the finite survey area, which can lead to an underestimation of the clustering at large scales: this is the integral constraint \\citep{Groth&Peebles1977}. Its impact becomes significant at scales above $0.02\\,\\mathrm{deg}$. A correction term exists \\citep{RocheEales99}, but as it necessitates an estimation of the ``true'' ACF, we do not apply it in our analysis. We calculate the ACF across a range of angular scales determined to be above the resolution and below the total area of the survey: $10^{-4} \\le \\theta \\le 10^{-1} \\,\\mathrm{deg}$, with a number of bins $N_\\theta \\in [10, 15]$ (depending on $z$). \n\n\\section{Auto-correlation functions of star-forming and quiescent galaxies} \\label{sec:results}\n\nFirst, we present measurements of auto-correlation functions of mass-complete subsamples of SFGs and QGs across $z = 0.1 - 5$ in COSMOS-Web.\n\n\\subsection{Samples limited by mass thresholds} \\label{subsec:autocorr_massthresh}\n\nThe auto-correlation is shown for samples limited in stellar mass, first without HMM in \\reffig{fig:autocorr_thresh}. \n\\begin{figure*}[p!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[height=0.95\\textheight]{figures/SEPPv3.1.0_clustering_QTvsSF_massthresholds_withresiduals_v0226.pdf}\n \\caption{Angular auto-correlation function for quiescent (red lines) and star-forming (blue lines) galaxies, in samples limited by lower limits in stellar mass and redshift bins. Both angular ($\\theta$) and comoving physical scales ($r_{\\rm c}$) are represented, where the latter has been calculated at the bin mean redshift. The relative difference $\\Delta w$ between the clustering of SFGs ($w_{\\rm SFG}$) and QGs ($w_{\\rm QG}$) is shown in each bottom panel for the same mass limits (with a grey scale, where lighter grey corresponds to a lower mass threshold). This is done without halo mass matching.}\n \\label{fig:autocorr_thresh}\n\\end{figure*}\nWe find that QGs are more clustered than SFGs of about 0.5 to 1.2\\,dex \\citep[an common result in the literature, \\eg][]{Zehavi2011,RodriguezPuebla2015,Coil2017,Berti2019}, consistently across all redshifts. The only exception to this pattern occurs for galaxies with $\\log(M_\\star/{\\rm M}_\\odot) \\ge 11$, where the clustering of QGs and SFGs is similar (a result that holds despite comparable numbers of QGs and SFGs in this bin). The relative ratio $\\Delta w = (w_{\\rm QG}-w_{\\rm SFG})/w_{\\rm SFG}$ becomes less significant with increasing redshift, decreasing from $\\ge 10$ at $z < 1$ to $\\Delta w \\le 5$ at $z \\ge 3.5$ for the lower mass bin. In other words, the environment of low-mass QGs is more similar to that of SFGs at higher $z$, but we still find that there are differences in their environments even at $3.5 \\le z < 5$. Another interesting finding is that $\\Delta w$ anti-correlates with the stellar mass threshold, particularly at $z < 2$ and for the intra-halo term ($\\theta \\lesssim 10^{-2}\\,{\\rm deg}$ at $z \\simeq 1$, or $r < 1\\,{\\rm Mpc}$). The clustering of lower mass QGs is then stronger than that of higher mass QGs, while the opposite trend is observed for SFGs. \n\nAfter conducting halo mass matching, some of the ACFs become poorly constrained because we significantly reduced the number of objects in each bin (by about 20 to 40\\% for QGs). This is presented in \\refapp{app:autocorr_thresh_HMM}. Nonetheless, the trends still show that QGs exhibit a clustering 0.2 to $1 \\,\\mathrm{dex}$ higher compared to SFGs in the range $z = 0.1 - 5$. However, the variations in clustering for QGs based on stellar mass are diminished, as measurements in all mass bins for QGs are consistent with each other within the uncertainties.\n\n\\subsection{Samples in mass bins} \\label{subsec:autocorr_massbins}\n\nTo better separate the contributions from different populations, we also compute the clustering of SFGs and QGs within stellar mass ranges instead of thresholds. This is shown for three redshift bins in \\reffig{fig:autocorr_ranges} without HMM, and in \\refapp{app:autocorr_thresh_HMM} with HMM. \n\\begin{figure*}[b!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.95\\textwidth]{figures/SEPPv3.1.0_clustering_QTvsSF_massranges_withresiduals_only3zbins.pdf}\n \\caption{Similar to \\reffig{fig:autocorr_thresh}, but considering stellar mass ranges instead of thresholds, in three redshift bins. This is done without halo mass matching.}\n \\label{fig:autocorr_ranges}\n\\end{figure*}\nThe signal is however noisier as the number of QGs in each bin is significantly reduced. Because of this lack of statistics, we have not been able to perform HMM at $z \\ge 2$. Nevertheless, this allows us to confirm that QGs become more clustered as stellar mass decreases at $z < 2$, which contrasts with the behaviour of SFGs. For instance, up to $z = 2$, QGs with $M_\\star < 10^{10}\\,{\\rm M}_\\odot$ are about 20 times more clustered than SFGs of same mass, and across all angular scales.\n\nWhile these results are supported by other literature measurements (\\eg \\citealt{McCracken2008}, finding faint red galaxies more clustered than their brighter counterparts; or \\citealt{Tinker2013}; \\citealt{Sato2014}; \\citealt{Ji18}), it is in contradiction with the hierarchical model of structure formation. Indeed, this scenario would place more massive galaxies in more massive halos, leading to greater clustering with increasing stellar mass. This is the case for SFGs, but the contradiction for QGs may be attributed to how they populate halos or to the quenching mechanisms at work in high-density environments (these low-mass QGs could then be satellites, affected by environmental quenching). We discuss this in more detail in \\refsubsec{subsec:envquenching}. \n\n\\subsection{Synthesis of auto-correlations} \\label{subsec:autocorr_summary}\n\nWe synthesise our results in \\reffig{fig:autocorr_sum} by representing the ratio of the QG/SFG clustering $R_{\\rm QG/SFG}$ as a function of $M_\\star$, for the different cases considered.\n\\begin{figure}[ht!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\columnwidth]{figures/summaryplot_autocorrelations_ratio_QTvsSF_paper_new.pdf}\n \\vspace{-4mm}\n \\caption{Ratio of clustering amplitudes $R_{\\rm QG/SFG} = A_{\\rm QG}/A_{\\rm SFG}$ as a function of stellar mass and redshift, for one-halo spatial scales ($r_{\\rm c} < 1 \\,{\\rm Mpc}$). Top row: for stellar mass thresholds (\\refsubsec{subsec:autocorr_massthresh}, with more thresholds), with and without HMM. Bottom row: for stellar mass ranges (\\refsubsec{subsec:autocorr_massbins}), with and without HMM. A line at $R_{\\rm QG/SFG} = 1$ is shown in dashed grey.}\n \\label{fig:autocorr_sum}\n\\end{figure}\nTo average over angular scales and account for statistical variations, we model each ACF as two simple power laws $w^{\\rm mod}(\\theta) = A \\theta^{-\\gamma}$ in the one-halo and two-halo regimes ($r_{\\rm c}$ lower or greater than $1 \\,{\\rm Mpc}$, respectively). Each one-halo and two-halo ACF is fitted while assuming a shared $\\gamma$ for QGs and SFGs\\footnote{\nWhile the literature shows that QGs tend to have steeper ACF slopes than SFGs, the difference remains below $\\sim$20\\% in our angular scale regime \\citep[\\eg][]{Sato2014,Coil2017}, which would not significantly affect our conclusions.\n} in each bin, as we are only interested in the amplitude ratio. The ratio of fitted amplitudes $R_{\\rm QG/SFG} = w_{\\rm QG}^{\\rm mod}/w_{\\rm SFG}^{\\rm mod} = A_{\\rm QG}/A_{\\rm SFG}$ is then computed, along with its associated fitting errors.\n\nAs shown, $R_{\\rm QG/SFG}$ is significantly higher for low-mass galaxies, with low-mass QGs being globally 5 to 13 times more clustered than SFGs with mass thresholds, or 10 to 30 times more than SFGs in mass ranges below $\\sim 10^{9.5}\\,{\\rm M}_\\odot$. This ratio decreases gradually with increasing $M_\\star$ (for both with and without HMM), except for the lowest mass bin at $z \\le 0.6$ (see \\refsubsec{subsec:envquenching}). This trend persists up to $z = 2$; however, beyond this redshift, the ratio appears to remain constant with $M_\\star$ $-$ an observation that becomes even clearer after applying HMM. We interpret these trends in \\refsubsec{subsec:envquenching}.\n\n\\section{Cross-correlations and search for conformity} \\label{sec:crosscorr}\n\nOur first results suggest that environmental effects quench low-mass galaxies at $z \\lesssim 2$, and leave a signature in the clustering of QGs. We now ask whether the star formation activity is correlated among galaxies sharing a common halo or large-scale environment, beyond halo mass. To explore this possibility, we turn to cross-correlations of SFGs and QGs subdivided into two classes chosen to trace different environments. \n\n\\subsection{Cross-correlations with high- and low-mass samples} \\label{subsec:crosscorr_mass}\n\nIdeally, we would separate galaxies into centrals and satellites, since centrals are thought to trace halo mass and the large-scale structure, while satellites are more influenced by the halo environment. However, accurately identifying centrals and satellites is complex and may introduce biases \\citep[\\eg][]{Sun2018, Tinker2018a, Calderon2018}. Therefore, we start by splitting our sample into high- and low-mass galaxies following the method proposed by \\cite{Hatfield&Jarvis17}, which assumes that high-mass galaxies act as ``drivers'' of environmental processes, while the low-mass ones are the ``followers'' affected by these effects. We aim to extend their analysis (limited to $0.4 \\le z < 2$) to a deeper dataset thanks to COSMOS-Web. \n\nWe define the high- and low-mass classes to roughly align with the mass distributions of the central and satellite populations (respectively), while also ensuring sufficient statistics in each bin. According to the study of \\cite{Zaidi2024} done in COSMOS, a threshold of about $\\log(M_\\star / {\\rm M}_\\odot) \\ge 10.5 $ corresponds to an observed decline of the satellites' mass function, beyond which centrals largely dominate the counts. Consistently, the COSMOS-Web group catalogue shows that $\\sim$90\\% of satellites fall below this threshold, while $\\sim$50\\% of centrals (and $\\sim$90\\% of quiescent centrals) lie above it. Hence, we choose the low-mass class for both SFGs and QGs, as follows: $8.5 \\le \\log(M_\\star/{\\rm M}_\\odot) < 10$ for $z < 1.5$, $9 \\le \\log(M_\\star/{\\rm M}_\\odot) < 10.5$ for $1.5 \\le z < 2.5$ and $9 \\le \\log(M_\\star/{\\rm M}_\\odot) < 10.75$ for $z \\ge 2.5$. High-mass subsamples consist of objects with masses above these upper limits. \n\nControlling for halo mass is also crucial here, so we show cross-correlation measurements with HMM in \\reffig{fig:crosscorr_SM_HMM} (and without in \\refapp{app:crosscorr_withoutHMM}). One interesting result is that, at scales $\\theta \\lesssim 10^{-2} \\,{\\rm deg}$, the cross-correlation [QGs low-mass $\\times$ QGs high-mass] is higher than [QGs low-mass $\\times$ SFGs high-mass]. Specifically, the difference is significant\n\\footnote{Here, the detection significance $S$ is the S/N of the cross-correlation difference $\\Delta w_{\\rm cc}(\\theta)$ integrated over $\\theta$ (in one and two-halo regimes), relative to the null hypothesis $\\Delta w_{\\rm cc}=0$ (no conformity). We compute it via $S = {\\rm PPF}(1 - p/2)$ where PPF is the inverse normal cumulative density function and $p$ is the $p$-value of a $\\chi^2 = \\sum_{\\theta_i} (\\Delta w_{\\rm cc}(\\theta_i)/\\sigma_{\\Delta w_{\\rm cc}})^2$ distribution.} \nat a $\\ge 3\\sigma$ level at $z \\le 1.5$ and becomes minor ($\\le 1\\sigma$) at $z \\ge 2$ where the uncertainties make it also consistent with zero. It lies below $2\\sigma$ at large scales. On the contrary, minor differences (below $0.5\\sigma$) are seen between cross correlations [SFGs low-mass $\\times$ SFGs high-mass] and [SFGs low-mass $\\times$ QGs high-mass].\n\n\\begin{figure*}[!htbp]\n \\centering\n \\vspace{1cm}\n \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\textwidth]{figures/SEPPv3.1.0_crosscorrelations_QTvsSF_lowSMvshighSM_withUMhaloMM_paper_med3_withschema2.pdf}\n \\caption{Angular cross-correlations for SFGs and QGs in redshift bins, split in high- and low-mass subsamples, and after performing halo mass-matching. Differences between cross-correlations $\\Delta w_{\\rm cc}$ involving low-mass QGs and low-mass SFGs are shown in the bottom panels.}\n \\label{fig:crosscorr_SM_HMM}\n\\end{figure*}\n\nThis observation suggests the detection of a one-halo conformity signal: quiescent low-mass galaxies are more likely to be found near quiescent massive galaxies than star-forming ones, even after accounting for halo mass, while the spatial distribution of star-forming low-mass galaxies does not depend on the type of the massive galaxy sample. However, this effect is observed only at the scale of a halo ($\\lesssim 1 \\,\\mathrm{Mpc}$) and at $z \\le 2$.\n\n\\subsection{Cross-correlations with centrals and satellites} \\label{subsec:crosscorr_group}\n\nSecondly, we make use of the COSMOS-Web group catalogue at $z \\le 3.7$ to compute the cross-correlations with central and satellite populations in this range. Centrals are identified by \\citealt{Toni2026}, considering these criteria: (1) proximity to the group centre in projected sky coordinates (distance $< 0.3\\times R_{200}$, where $R_{200}$ is the group model radius used by the detection algorithm) and in redshift ($\\Delta z < 0.05 \\times [1+z]$); (2) having the highest stellar mass; and (3) a higher group membership probability if the first and second more massive galaxies have a mass difference lower than $0.25$. Satellites are then identified as group galaxies (having $> 50\\%$ probability of belonging to a group) that are not centrals. The rest are labeled as ``field'' galaxies; these are not used in our work.\n\nThe results are shown in \\reffig{fig:crosscorr_group} for three redshift bins, with and without halo mass matching. Cross-correlations without HMM are in agreement with our previous findings, with a conformity signal for quiescent satellites around quiescent centrals at $6\\sigma$ for the bin $0.6 \\le z < 1$, $> 1\\sigma$ at $1 \\le z < 1.5$, $3\\sigma$ at $1.5 \\le z < 2$ and becomes insignificant at $z \\ge 2$. This is however largely reduced by matching halo mass distributions, with $\\sim 1\\sigma$ detections only for the bin $0.6 \\le z < 1$ (although the signal remains visually apparent in $z < 2$ bins in \\reffig{fig:crosscorr_SM_HMM}).\n\n\\begin{figure*}[!htbp]\n \\centering\n %\\vspace{1cm}\n \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\textwidth]{figures/SEPPv3.1.0_crosscorrelations_QTvsSF_satvscen_only3zbins_paper_withschema.pdf}\n \\vspace{-3mm}\n \\caption{Angular cross-correlations for SFGs and QGs, subdivided in samples of satellites and centrals, in three redshift bins. Differences between samples involving quiescent satellites and star-forming satellites are shown in the bottom panels. Top row: without halo mass-matching. Bottom row: with halo mass matching.}\n \\label{fig:crosscorr_group}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\subsection{Synthesis of cross-correlations} \\label{subsec:crosscorr_summary}\n\nThese results are summarised in \\reffig{fig:crosscorr_sum}, which shows the detection significance of conformity (denoted $S$) as a function of redshift, for low-mass (or satellite) QGs and SFGs around their central (measured from $\\Delta w_{\\rm cc, QG}$ and $\\Delta w_{\\rm cc, SFG}$ in \\reffig{fig:crosscorr_SM_HMM} and \\reffig{fig:crosscorr_group}). It covers the various cases considered (with/without HMM), and separates the one-halo and two-halo scales. This highlights that conformity is detected only in the one-halo regime, where low-mass QGs are more clustered around high-mass QGs than SFGs of the same halo mass. This observation appears at $z \\le 2$ and becomes more pronounced as $z$ decreases. This is also observed for satellite QGs around central QGs, although the significance diminishes considerably after matching halo mass distributions. We caution that the two-halo term is subject to the integral constraint, which limits conclusions in this regime. These results are discussed in \\refsubsec{subsec:conformity}.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\columnwidth]{figures/summaryplot_crosscorrelations_significance_QTvsSF_paper_new.pdf}\n \\vspace{-5mm}\n \\caption{Detection significance of the conformity signal $S$ for QGs (red) and SFGs (blue) as a function of redshift, in the one-halo (solid lines) and two-halo (dashed lines) regimes. Top row: from low/high mass cross-correlations (\\refsubsec{subsec:crosscorr_mass}), with and without HMM. Bottom row: from central/satellite cross-correlations (\\refsubsec{subsec:crosscorr_group}), with and without HMM.}\n \\label{fig:crosscorr_sum}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\section{Discussion: what factors beyond halo mass influence galaxy clustering?} \\label{sec:discussion}\n\n\\subsection{Environmental quenching up to $z \\simeq 2$} \\label{subsec:envquenching} \n\nOne of the key findings from \\refsec{sec:results} is that QGs are always more clustered than SFGs of the same stellar mass. This indicates that even the earliest passive galaxies at $z \\sim 3.5-5$ live in different environments compared to their star-forming counterparts. Applying HMM reduced this excess, particularly at $z \\ge 2$, suggesting that the tendency of QGs to occupy more massive halos dominates over secondary effects. \nYet, differences remain and may be attributed to secondary factors: QGs may predominantly be satellites, be connected to halo secondary properties, or occupy higher-density regions. We believe the latter alone cannot account for the $z > 1$ signal, since some studies show that the anti-correlation between sSFR and local density breaks down at $z \\leq 1$, either by reversing to positive \\citep[\\eg in COSMOS,][]{Shi2024, Taamoli2024, Li2025} or becoming restricted to extreme overdensities only \\citep{Hatamnia2026}. Instead, the galaxy's location within the cosmic web might regulate its star formation at fixed halo mass, as supported by \\cite{Jego2026} who find a modulation of sSFR with distance to filaments in COSMOS at $z = 0.5-2$.\n\nWe note that there is an exception at $\\log(M_\\star/{\\rm M}_\\odot) \\ge 11$, where QGs and SFGs clustering converge. Such massive SFGs are often central members of massive clusters, and are likely to become quenched due to gas exhaustion or the high probability of hosting an AGN at this mass. It is thus reasonable that they exist in environments similar to those of massive QGs. \n\nA second exception occurs for $\\log(M_\\star/{\\rm M}_\\odot) < 9$ galaxies at $0.1 \\le z < 0.6$, showing a more comparable clustering between QGs and SFGs than at higher mass. \\cite{Geha2012} indicate that quenched dwarfs are exclusively satellites, which are at a more advanced stage of environmental quenching than the star-forming dwarfs in the same halo; but further investigation of dwarf quenching is needed to explain this result.\n\nThe second key result from our measured auto-correlations is that as stellar mass increases, SFGs become more clustered $-$ which aligns with the hierarchical picture where more massive galaxies reside within more massive halos, themselves more clustered $-$ while QGs show the opposite trend. It persists even after HMM, but only up to $z \\simeq 2$. We also observe the same trend in \\UM by computing auto-correlations in halo mass bins instead of stellar mass (see \\refapp{app:autocorr_UM}): at the same $M_{\\rm h}$, QGs are more clustered than SFGs, and differences are greater as $\\Mh$ decreases. This result is consistent with environmental quenching of low-mass galaxies: the highly clustered low-mass QGs are likely to be either satellites in groups or clusters, or galaxies influenced by their local environment \\citep[\\eg][]{Boselli2006, Moutard2018, Alberts2024}. This signal is present from $z \\simeq 2$ to the present, consistent with other works finding no evidence for dominant environmental quenching above $z \\sim 3$ \\citep[\\eg][]{Singh2025,Shuntov2026b}. \nThis does not imply that environmental quenching does not exist at higher $z$; it may still operate across all masses to a lesser extent, and/or only in extreme overdensities such as protoclusters. Our remaining excess clustering for QGs at $z > 2$ after HMM could therefore reflect either of these effects, galaxy assembly bias, or both.\n\nTo disentangle the processes involved in their quenching, we show their morphology in \\reffig{fig:prop_lowmassQT} via their Sérsic index $n_\\mathrm{s}$ (averaged over the $1-5 \\,\\si{\\micro\\meter}$ wavelength range). Low-mass QGs exhibit a distinct disky distribution at $z < 2$, which resembles that of SFGs more than that of more massive QGs. This suggests that the quenching mechanism does not significantly disrupt their morphology, thereby ruling out mergers or fly-bys. Instead, it favours ram-pressure stripping, which removes gas from satellites as they enter hot halos \\citep[\\eg][]{Boselli2006,Boselli2022}, or gas depletion, whereby satellites accreted onto massive hot halos are cut off from fresh cold gas inflows \\citep[\\eg][]{Hatfield&Jarvis17}.\n\n\\begin{figure}[b!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\columnwidth]{figures/morphoproperties_lowmassSFGs+QGs_v3.1.0_paper.pdf}\n \\vspace{-5mm}\n \\caption{Distribution of the Sérsic index $n_\\mathrm{s}$ for SFGs (blue lines) and QGs (red lines), in mass ranges and in two redshift bins.}\n \\label{fig:prop_lowmassQT}\n\\end{figure}\n\nTherefore, our results provide evidence for the action of environmental quenching at $z \\le 2$, whose power increases for lower stellar mass and leaves a signature in galaxies' ACF. While these external quenching mechanisms may depend on halo mass, they might also depend on secondary halo properties or the cosmic web environment at fixed halo mass. Ram-pressure stripping for instance could affect a galaxy as a function of the distance to the halo centre or halo density rather than solely on its mass. \n\n\\subsection{One-halo conformity up to $z \\simeq 2$} \\label{subsec:conformity} \n\nIf quenching is influenced by secondary halo properties or the large-scale environment beyond halo mass, the SFRs of galaxies in a common environment (such as a central galaxy with its satellites) may be correlated: this is the conformity phenomenon.\n\nOur results show a one-halo conformity signal: low-mass QGs are more clustered around high-mass QGs than what is measured for star-forming ones, even after controlling for halo mass, and this trend persists up to $z = 2$. A tentative signal is also observed for satellite QGs around central QGs. This is consistent with previous studies, mainly based on SDSS data at low $z$ \\citep[\\eg][]{Weinmann2006,Kawinwanichakij2016,Hatfield&Jarvis17,Guo2017,Ji18,Zentner2019}; but also in the COSMOS field by \\cite{Kaviraj2025}, who finds that half of low-$z$ red dwarfs lie near massive galaxies, arguing this proximity is a stronger quenching driver than distance to filaments, nodes, or local density. Yet, we do not observe this effect beyond the typical halo radius $r_{\\rm c} \\ge 1\\,{\\rm Mpc}$, as has been claimed by \\cite{Kauffmann2013} or \\cite{Calderon2018}. However, we do not claim a complete non-detection of this signal; rather, our survey is not wide enough to accurately probe the two-halo term within the error bars required to identify this low-amplitude signal and overcome the integral constraint.\n\nThus, central and satellites have correlated histories, either because the mechanism that quenched the central quenches also the neighbouring galaxies (for instance, \\citealt{Dashyan2019} show that the AGN feedback from centrals could affect its close neighbours), or because of the environment they share. \n\nOne scenario for the latter is if QGs are hosted by older or more concentrated halos at fixed halo mass \\citep[\\eg][]{Hearin&Watson2013,Watson2015,Wang2026}, which is a form of assembly bias. For instance, \\cite{Oyarzun2024} show that the stellar mass of quiescent centrals correlates with their halo formation time at fixed halo mass; \\cite{Wang2022} find that more concentrated halos are more likely to host centrals that formed earlier; and \\cite{Zentner2019} provides evidence that models assuming a significant central galaxy assembly bias tied to halo concentration better fit SDSS clustering. In this case, a conformity signal may arise \\citep{Hearin2015}: early-formed halos, which tend to be more gas-rich and denser, are more likely to host central galaxies that grew and quenched early, and can more efficiently quench accreted satellites via ram-pressure stripping \\citep{Wang&White2012}. This is also consistent with discoveries from \\JWST indicating intense star formation which produced very massive galaxies at $z \\ge 5$: early-formed halos would then be more likely to host quiescent descendants at lower redshifts. Nonetheless, we find no evidence of any discrepancies related to the age of formation, star formation history or morphology of our quiescent satellites based on the type of their neighbouring central. Further research is necessary to investigate whether assembly bias, if it exists and is responsible for the conformity signal, affects galaxy properties.\n\nThe work by \\cite{Zu&Mandelbaum2016,Zu&Mandelbaum2018} offers an alternative explanation to conformity requiring no assembly bias: quenching is driven by halo mass alone, but the halo mass function varies with large-scale environment, so that denser regions host more massive halos and thus more QGs. Quenching relies on the ability of the host halo to cool the flowing gas, acting differently on centrals and satellites. This reproduces SDSS conformity signals from galaxy colours, but only at fixed stellar mass $-$ not fixed halo mass $-$ making it unlikely to fully explain our results. One-halo conformity could also be driven by differences in the radial distributions of SFGs and QGs satellites within halos, an effect that requires more information on halo occupation and mass profiles to be properly assessed.\n\nWe also note that the signal decreases as $z$ increases, ultimately vanishing at $z \\ge 2$. Prior evidence of this evolution has been noted by \\cite{Kawinwanichakij2016} up to $z \\ge 1.6$; \\cite{Hartley2015} reported a 3$\\sigma$ one-halo conformity signal in the range of $0.4 \\le z < 1.9$; and \\cite{Binh2025} show no trace of conformity at $z \\sim 3-5$ for massive QGs in COSMOS-Web. Hence, whatever the physical explanation for conformity might be, its impact on galaxy clustering should decline with increasing redshift and disappear after cosmic noon. \n\n\\subsection{Limitations of this work} \\label{subsec:limitations}\n\nDetecting conformity is complex because it requires accurately identifying which galaxies are in the same halos and the masses of these halos; otherwise, spurious conformity signals can arise from systematic errors only \\citep{Calderon2018}.\n\n\\paragraph{Controlling for halo mass.} One of the challenges is to accurately correct for halo mass. Our method relies on the assumption that \\UM represents well the spatial distribution of SFGs and QGs across time, along with their properties. This is justified by the fact that \\UM reproduces previous clustering measurements by design, and matches the COSMOS-Web SHMR over $z=0.1-14$ \\citepalias{Paquereau2025}. Moreover, it is built by correlating star formation histories with halo assembly, which results in the rise of galaxy assembly bias \\citep{Behroozi19}: \\UM's QGs are associated with older halos that have had no recent accretion, while SFGs are linked to halos that are rapidly accreting, at the same halo mass. Nonetheless, the HMM technique involves removing random objects from the samples, which could dilute or bias the signal. Although beyond the scope of our work, HMM could be tested using weak lensing: mass-matched samples of SFGs and QGs should yield similar lensing measurements if their halo mass distributions are indeed equivalent.\n\n\\paragraph{Galaxy properties.} The second source of uncertainty lies in the central/satellite identification: as shown by \\cite{Campbell2015} or \\cite{Lacerna2018}, misclassifications from group finders can introduce artificial conformity detections. This is why we tested two configurations for the cross-correlations in \\refsec{sec:crosscorr}, both in agreement. Furthermore, the purity and completeness of the group catalogue have been examined using galaxy mocks and set to at least 70\\%, as discussed by \\cite{Toni2025}. The extensive spectroscopic compilation in COSMOS \\citep{Khostovan2025} has also facilitated the clear identification of groups, with approximately one-third of groups having spectroscopic confirmation. We tested in more detail the impact of HMM and central/satellite misidentification in \\refapp{app:limitations}.\n\nA misclassification of quiescent and star-forming galaxies can also bias the clustering. We confirmed that our findings stay consistent using a $NUVrJ$ criteria instead. Moreover, the 37 photometric bands available in COSMOS-Web, including the deep \\JWST imaging, provide rest-frame UV coverage out to $z \\sim 4-5$, enabling robust estimates of physical properties.\n\n\\paragraph{Statistics.} Finally, we acknowledge the uncertainties inherent to ACF measurements, particularly at $z \\ge 2$ where the QGs sample decreases to fewer than 100 objects in each bin, leading to a loss of statistical power. Our analysis also relies on photometric redshift bins, which can bias the clustering signal upward or downward if photo-$z$ are inaccurate, or produce spurious signals due to projection effects (see \\citetalias{Paquereau2025} for more details). The relatively small area of COSMOS-Web, compared to wide-field surveys such as SDSS, is also a limitation: \\eg \\citet{Lim2025} show that the detection amplitude of conformity depends on cosmic variance effects. It also restricts our sensitivity to large-scale conformity signals; for this reason, we focused primarily on the one-halo detection in this study.\n\n\\section{Conclusion} \\label{sec:conclusion}\n\nWe used two-point auto- and cross-correlation functions of quiescent and star-forming galaxies from $z \\simeq 5$ to the present-day in the COSMOS-Web survey, to investigate the influence of the environment on galaxy quenching. To isolate effects beyond halo mass, we introduced a procedure matching QGs and SFGs halo mass distributions based on the \\textsc{UniverseMachine} model. Our main conclusions are as follows:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item QGs are more clustered than SFGs of the same stellar mass across the range $z = 0.1 - 5$, indicating that the environments of the earliest QGs are already distinct from those of their star-forming counterparts. This difference is, however, largely reduced at $z \\ge 2$ after removing the effect of halo mass, indicating that QGs most likely live in more massive halos at these early times. Yet, QGs stay more clustered at $z \\le 2$ (at small scales), hinting at another effect induced by secondary halo properties or the environment.\n \n \\item QGs are more clustered with decreasing stellar mass, where low-mass QGs are the most clustered objects among all populations, up to $z \\simeq 2$. SFGs show the opposite trend. These low-mass QGs are likely satellites that underwent rapid environmental quenching of star formation without significantly altering their morphology, as they are mostly discs. Such processes may include ram-pressure stripping or the cessation of new cold gas inflows.\n \n \\item Cross-correlations reveal that low-mass (or satellites) QGs are more clustered around high-mass (or centrals) QGs than around star-forming ones or even the overall massive (or central) sample. This is also seen after halo mass matching, with at least a 2$\\sigma$ significance on average, but only at low scales ($r \\lesssim 1 \\,\\mathrm{Mpc}$) and up to redshift $z \\le 2$. This stands for a detection of one-halo conformity, where galaxies and their neighbouring central have correlated SFRs. This signal may arise either from a quenching mechanism affecting both the central and satellites (\\eg AGN feedback), from correlated growth histories prior to infall (\\eg via cosmic web processes), from their shared halo environment (\\eg in case of a hot and dense halo), or from effects related to secondary halo properties (\\eg in case of assembly bias).\n\\end{itemize}\nThese results point to the fact that modelling quenching and galaxy correlation functions requires more than halo mass alone. Environmental quenching for low-mass galaxies should be accounted for at $z \\le 2$, as well as the proximity to a massive central galaxy (depending on its SFR).\n\nHowever, limitations in galaxy classification and halo mass estimates call for improved data or statistics to move forward. Halo masses could be better constrained through X-ray emission of groups and clusters \\citep[as demonstrated in COSMOS2020 by][]{Toni2024}, or gravitational lensing \\citep{Scognamiglio2026}. A natural next step would also be to use halo occupation models \\citep[\\eg, from][]{Hearin2016b,Hearin2017,Pahwa2017} to investigate conformity scenarios and halo properties in more detail.\n\n\\begin{acknowledgements}\nPart of this work was presented in a preliminary version in LP's thesis manuscript. \nLP acknowledges the thesis funding from the Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES) and the Ecole Doctorale Astronomie et Astrophysique d'Ile-de-France. \nThe authors acknowledge the funding of the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche for the project iMAGE (grant ANR-22-CE31-0007). \nThis work was made possible by utilising the CANDIDE cluster at the Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, which was funded through grants from the PNCG, CNES, DIM-ACAV, the Euclid Consortium, and the Cosmic Dawn Center (DNRF140) and is maintained by Stephane Rouberol. \nThe authors acknowledge the contributions of the COSMOS collaboration. The French contingent of the COSMOS team is partly supported by the CNES. \n\\end{acknowledgements}\n\n\\bibliographystyle{aa_url}\n\\bibliography{references}\n\n\\begin{appendix}\n\n\\twocolumn\n\n\\section{Quiescent/star-forming classification} \\label{app:class}\n\nVarious methods exist to classify galaxies into quiescent or star-forming populations, typically by employing either rest-frame colour-colour diagrams \\citep[\\eg $UVJ$,][]{Williams2009}, or exploiting SFR or sSFR thresholds \\citep[\\eg][]{Labbe2005}. We compared our evolving sSFR classification with alternatives, like a $NUVrJ$ selection \\citep{Arnouts2007,Ilbert2013} or a 2$\\sigma$ distance to the main sequence (noted $\\Delta$MS here; \\eg \\citealt{Fang2018, Bluck2022}).\n\nAs shown in \\reffig{app-fig:sSFRclass_contamination}, our identified QGs would also be identified as quiescent by these other methods. They also show a moderate clustering signal, in between the results of the other approaches. In contrast, these alternative selections show signs of contamination in different tracers: $\\Delta$MS-selected QGs lie in the star-forming region of $NUVrJ$ at high-$z$ ($z \\gtrsim 2$), or a large proportion of $NUVrJ$-selected QGs show high sSFR at low-$z$ ($z \\lesssim 2$). \n\n\\begin{figure}[h!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\columnwidth]{figures/QTvsSF_classification_comparisondiagrams_CIGALE_v3.1.0_evolsSFRselection_new.pdf}\n \\caption{Quiescent/star-forming classification, selected by a threshold in sSFR evolving with redshift (middle row), in three redshift bins. The resulting QGs (in red) and SFGs (in blue) are also shown in a $NUVrJ$ diagram (top row, with the black line being the criterion) and in relation to the main sequence (bottom row, where the dashed line represents a $2\\sigma$ distance to the linear fit of the MS shown with the black line).}\n \\label{app-fig:sSFRclass_contamination}\n\\end{figure}\n\nA probabilistic alternative has been developed by \\cite{Toni2026a}, who trained a machine-learning classifier on COSMOS-Web based on several traditional classification methods. This algorithm returns a ``quiescence probability'', that could in principle be used to weight clustering measurements; however, we leave this for future work.\n\n\\FloatBarrier\n\n\\section{Numbers of galaxies per bin} \\label{app:numbers}\n\n\\begin{table}[h!]\n \\centering\n \\caption{Numbers of SFGs and QGs in each redshift and stellar mass threshold bins.}\n \\fontsize{8.9pt}{8.9pt}\\selectfont\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.51}\n \\begin{tabular}{llllllllll}\n \\hline \\hline\n z bin & $\\log (M_\\star^{\\textrm{th}}/M_\\odot)$ & $N_{\\rm SFG}$ & $N_{\\rm QG}$ \\\\ \\hline\n $0.1 \\le z < 0.6$ & 7.75 & 20628 & 2862 \\\\\n & 8.5 & 6902 & 1760 \\\\\n & 9.5 & 1577 & 928 \\\\\n & 10.5 & 139 & 383 \\\\ \\hline\n $0.6 \\le z < 1.0$ & 8.0 & 42537 & 2744 \\\\\n & 9.0 & 13935 & 2549 \\\\\n & 10.0 & 3247 & 1794 \\\\\n & 10.5 & 1091 & 1175 \\\\\n & 11.0 & 95 & 360 \\\\ \\hline\n $1.0 \\le z < 1.5$ & 9.0 & 15001 & 1347 \\\\\n & 10.0 & 2908 & 1147 \\\\\n & 10.5 & 1066 & 798 \\\\\n & 11.0 & 192 & 241 \\\\ \\hline\n $1.5 \\le z < 2.0$ & 9.0 & 16705 & 934 \\\\\n & 10.0 & 3133 & 866 \\\\\n & 10.75 & 706 & 424 \\\\ \\hline\n $2.0 \\le z < 2.5$ & 9.5 & 5806 & 376 \\\\\n & 10.75 & 571 & 204 \\\\ \\hline\n $2.5 \\le z < 3.5$ & 9.5 & 7587 & 325 \\\\\n & 10.5 & 1044 & 235 \\\\ \\hline\n $3.5 \\le z < 5.0$ & 9.5 & 4510 & 227 \\\\\n & 10.5 & 448 & 133 \\\\ \\hline \n \\end{tabular}\n \\vspace{3mm}\n \\label{app-tab:counts}\n\\end{table}\n\\FloatBarrier\n\n\\section{Quiescent fraction} \\label{app:fQG}\n\nWe show in \\reffig{app-fig:fQG} the evolution with redshift of the fraction of QGs, within stellar mass bins. For each stellar mass bin, $f_{\\rm QG}$ appears to mildly evolve from high-$z$ down to $z \\sim 1 - 2$ (depending on $M_\\star$), below which it increases exponentially. The peaks at $z \\sim 3-4$ for the most massive QGs can be explained by the presence of a protocluster in the COSMOS-Web area, evidenced for instance by \\cite{Toni2025}. \n\nThis evolution is consistent with the conclusions of \\refsubsec{subsec:envquenching}. Massive QGs have most likely been quenched by internal processes (such as AGN feedback), which can operate at any redshift and produce a gradual increase in $f_{\\rm QG}$. For lower mass galaxies, however, $f_{\\rm QG}$ rises sharply below a ``triggering'' redshift that depends on the mass bin, suggesting that environmental quenching becomes the dominant driver once structures such as groups and clusters have grown sufficiently to efficiently quench satellites and low-mass centrals. A similar conclusion was reached by \\cite{Ji18} who found that the fraction of low-mass galaxies evolves more rapidly in the $z = 1 - 4$ range compared to massive ones. We refer the reader to \\cite{Shuntov2026b} for a more complete analysis of quiescent fractions and stellar mass functions across cosmic time in COSMOS-Web.\n\n\\begin{figure}[h!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\columnwidth]{figures/QTvsSF_v3.1.0_quiescentfraction_massranges.pdf}\n \\caption{Fraction of quiescent galaxies (defined as $f_{\\rm QG} = N_{\\rm QG}/N_{\\rm total}$) in stellar mass bins, as a function of redshift. Shaded areas show the $1\\sigma$ uncertainty computed from Poisson errors and cosmic variance. }\n \\label{app-fig:fQG}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\FloatBarrier\n\n\\section{Illustration of the halo mass matching procedure} \\label{app:HMM}\n\n\\begin{figure}[h!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1.0\\columnwidth]{figures/HMMschema.pdf}\n %\\includegraphics[width=0.6\\columnwidth]{figures/HMMschema.pdf}\n \\caption{Halo mass-matching procedure between SFGs and QGs in COSMOS-Web at $0.6 \\le z < 1$ using \\textsc{UniverseMachine}. Each row represents a sequential step in the process: step 1 matches stellar mass distributions of \\UM galaxies to COSMOS-Web ones; step 2 matches halo mass distributions between SFGs and QGs in \\UM; and the last step matches the initial COSMOS-Web stellar mass distributions of SFGs and QGs to those resulting from step 2 in \\UM.}\n \\label{fig:halomassmatching}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\clearpage\n\\onecolumn\n\n\\section{Auto-correlation of SFGs and QGs after halo mass matching} \\label{app:autocorr_thresh_HMM}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[h!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[height=0.93\\textheight]{figures/SEPPv3.1.0_clustering_QTvsSF_massthresholds_withHMM_withresiduals_v0226.pdf}\n \\caption{Similar to \\reffig{fig:autocorr_thresh}, but after performing halo mass matching.}\n \\label{app-fig:autocorr_thresh_HMM}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.95\\textwidth]{figures/SEPPv3.1.0_clustering_QTvsSF_massranges_withresiduals_withHMM_only3zbins.pdf}\n \\caption{Similar to \\reffig{fig:autocorr_ranges}, but after performing halo mass matching.}\n \\label{app-fig:autocorr_ranges_HMM}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\clearpage\n\n\\section{Cross-correlations of SFGs and QGs} \\label{app:crosscorr_withoutHMM}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[h!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[height=0.91\\textheight]{figures/SEPPv3.1.0_crosscorrelations_QTvsSF_lowSMvshighSM_withoutUMhaloMM_schema.pdf}\n \\caption{Similar to \\reffig{fig:crosscorr_SM_HMM}, but without performing halo mass matching. We see a very significant conformity detection at the one-halo scales, up to $z = 2$ only.}\n \\label{app-fig:crosscorr_SM}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\clearpage\n\\twocolumn\n\n\\section{Clustering of quiescent and star-forming galaxies in \\textsc{UniverseMachine}} \\label{app:autocorr_UM}\n\nWe did the same exercise as with COSMOS-Web galaxies presented in \\refsec{sec:results}, but in \\UM instead. In a similar manner to \\reffig{fig:autocorr_sum}, we show the ratio between the clustering of QGs and that of SFGs, but within halo mass bins instead of stellar mass. This is presented for the one-halo regime in \\reffig{app-fig:summary_autocorr_SM}. These results are consistent with our trends based on stellar mass: $R_{\\rm QG/SFG}$ increases with decreasing halo mass, indicating that QGs in lower-mass halos become more and more clustered (most likely because they are satellites or reside in overdense regions). Beyond the critical halo mass $\\log(M_{\\rm h}/{\\rm M}_\\odot) \\simeq 12$, SFGs and QGs appear clustered the same. Interestingly, the amplitude of $R_{\\rm QG/SFG}$ is higher at cosmic noon than at lower redshift, an effect that could be attributed to the peak activity in clusters.\n\n\\begin{figure}[h!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.68\\columnwidth]{figures/summaryplot_UM_autocorrelations_halomassthresh_ratio_QTvsSF_paper.pdf}\n \\caption{Ratio of clustering amplitudes $R_{\\rm QG/SFG} = A_{\\rm QG}/A_{\\rm SFG}$ of \\UM galaxies, as a function of halo mass and redshift, and for one-halo spatial scales.}\n \\label{app-fig:summary_autocorr_SM}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\section{Testing the limitations in detecting conformity} \\label{app:limitations}\n\nIn this part, we test the two main limitations that could induce a wrong conformity detection: the control for halo mass between SFGs and QGs, and the central/satellite identification.\n\nFirst, we investigate the impact of halo-mass matching (HMM) in \\UM, where the true halo masses of galaxies are known. We measure the significance of one-halo conformity for quiescent satellites around quiescent centrals (compared to star-forming centrals), under four cases: (1) without matching the halo-mass distributions of SFGs and QGs; (2) with HMM; (3) with a partial HMM in which the 10\\% of quiescent centrals residing in the most massive halos are omitted in the matching; and (4) with an analogous partial HMM but applied to quiescent satellites. As shown in \\reffig{app-fig:limit_HMM}, applying HMM dramatically reduces the conformity signal, decreasing its significance from $>8\\sigma$ to only $0.5\\sigma$ at $z<3$. We note that some conformity is expected in \\UM, as if conformity exists in the COSMOS field, the \\UM model should have inherited it by design. But more importantly, we find that leaving just 10\\% of QG centrals in the most massive halos unmatched increases the conformity significance by more than a factor of $2-4$, reaching $>2\\sigma$ at $z<3$. This result demonstrates that the inferred amplitude of the conformity signal is highly sensitive to the accuracy of the halo-mass control, and that even small mismatches can produce a substantial artificial enhancement of the signal.\n\n\\begin{figure}[h!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.95\\columnwidth]{figures/UMcrosscorrelations_significance_QTvsSF_testHMM_paper.pdf}\n \\caption{Detection significance of the one-halo conformity signal for quiescent satellites as a function of redshift, as defined in \\refsec{sec:crosscorr} but here computed for \\UM galaxies. This considers four cases that vary the halo mass-matching procedure. We note that $S$ is numerically capped at $8\\sigma$ when the $p$-value equals 0.}\n \\label{app-fig:limit_HMM}\n\\end{figure}\n\nSecond, we investigate the impact of central and satellite classification, since previous studies have suggested that conformity can arise solely from systematics in this process \\citep[\\eg][]{Calderon2018}, or be driven by a small number of low-mass centrals located near massive clusters \\citep[\\eg][]{Lacerna2018}. To assess this effect, we repeat the previous exercise in COSMOS-Web while modifying the central and satellite samples. \\reffigure{app-fig:limit_censat} presents the conformity significance for four different selections: the fiducial sample; (A) a sample in which the 10\\% most massive centrals are removed; (B) a sample in which the 20\\% of centrals residing in the most overdense environments are removed; and (C) a sample in which the 10\\% most massive satellites are reassigned as centrals. We find that the conformity signal is enhanced when massive satellites are misclassified as centrals, highlighting the measurement's sensitivity to central-satellite identification. Moreover, a substantial fraction of the signal appears to be driven by centrals located in the most overdense environments, since removing them reduces the significance by a factor of $\\sim 2$ at $z<2$. This confirms that surveys covering small sky areas may be particularly susceptible to cosmic variance: fields containing rich clusters are more likely to detect an enhanced conformity signal than other regions.\n\n\\begin{figure}[h!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.95\\columnwidth]{figures/crosscorrelations_significance_QTvsSF_testcensat_paper.pdf}\n \\caption{Detection significance of the one-halo conformity signal for quiescent satellites as a function of redshift, as defined in \\refsec{sec:crosscorr}, for COSMOS-Web galaxies. This considers four cases that vary the central and satellite subsamples.}\n \\label{app-fig:limit_censat}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\end{appendix}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: references.bib\n================================================\n%---------------------------------------------- My papers ---------------------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{Paquereau2025,\n author = {{Paquereau}, L. and {Laigle}, C. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Shuntov}, M. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Akins}, H.~B. and {Allen}, N. and {Arango-Togo}, R. and {Berman}, E.~M. and {B{\\'e}thermin}, M. and {Casey}, C.~M. and {McCleary}, J. and {Dubois}, Y. and {Drakos}, N.~E. and {Faisst}, A.~L. and {Franco}, M. and {Harish}, S. and {Jespersen}, C.~K. and {Kartaltepe}, J.~S. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Kokorev}, V. and {Lambrides}, E. and {Larson}, R. and {Liu}, D. and {Le Borgne}, D. and {Lewis}, J.~S.~W. and {McKinney}, J. and {Mercier}, W. and {Rhodes}, J.~D. and {Robertson}, B.~E. and {Toft}, S. and {Trebitsch}, M. and {Tresse}, L. and {Weaver}, J.~R.},\n title = \"{Tracing the galaxy-halo connection with galaxy clustering in COSMOS-Web from z = 0.1 to z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 12}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: halos, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = oct,\n volume = {702},\n eid = {A163},\n pages = {A163},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202553828},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2501.11674},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...702A.163P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n%---------------------------------------------- Reviews ---------------------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{Hoekstra2008,\n author = {{Hoekstra}, Henk and {Jain}, Bhuvnesh},\n title = \"{Weak Gravitational Lensing and Its Cosmological Applications}\",\n journal = {Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science},\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = nov,\n volume = {58},\n number = {1},\n pages = {99-123},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev.nucl.58.110707.171151},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0805.0139},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ARNPS..58...99H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tojeiro&Kraljic2025,\n author = {{Tojeiro}, Rita and {Kraljic}, Katarina},\n title = \"{Large Scale Structure and the Cosmic Web}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = mar,\n eid = {arXiv:2503.21759},\n pages = {arXiv:2503.21759},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2503.21759},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2503.21759},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250321759T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kaviraj2025a,\n author = {{Kaviraj}, Sugata},\n title = \"{Mergers of galaxies}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = jun,\n eid = {arXiv:2506.09136},\n pages = {arXiv:2506.09136},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2506.09136},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2506.09136},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250609136K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Salim2014,\n author = {{Salim}, S.},\n title = \"{Green Valley Galaxies}\",\n journal = {Serbian Astronomical Journal},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, ultraviolet: galaxies, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = dec,\n volume = {189},\n pages = {1-14},\n doi = {10.2298/SAJ1489001S},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1501.01963},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014SerAJ.189....1S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mandelbaum2018,\n author = {{Mandelbaum}, Rachel},\n title = \"{Weak Lensing for Precision Cosmology}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = sep,\n volume = {56},\n pages = {393-433},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051928},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1710.03235},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ARA&A..56..393M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@INPROCEEDINGS{Stewart2017,\n author = {{Stewart}, Kyle R.},\n title = \"{Gas Accretion and Angular Momentum}\",\n keywords = {Physics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n booktitle = {Gas Accretion onto Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n editor = {{Fox}, Andrew and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel},\n series = {Astrophysics and Space Science Library},\n volume = {430},\n month = jan,\n pages = {249},\n doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-52512-9_11},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1612.00513},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ASSL..430..249S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hardcastle&Croston2020,\n author = {{Hardcastle}, M.~J. and {Croston}, J.~H.},\n title = \"{Radio galaxies and feedback from AGN jets}\",\n journal = {\\nar},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = jun,\n volume = {88},\n eid = {101539},\n pages = {101539},\n doi = {10.1016/j.newar.2020.101539},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2003.06137},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020NewAR..8801539H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bernardeau2002,\n author = {{Bernardeau}, F. and {Colombi}, S. and {Gazta{\\~n}aga}, E. and {Scoccimarro}, R.},\n title = \"{Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory}\",\n journal = {\\physrep},\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n year = 2002,\n month = sep,\n volume = {367},\n number = {1-3},\n pages = {1-248},\n doi = {10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00135-7},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0112551},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002PhR...367....1B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Carroll2001,\n author = {{Carroll}, Sean M.},\n title = \"{The Cosmological Constant}\",\n journal = {Living Reviews in Relativity},\n keywords = {cosmology, cosmological constant, vacuum energy, Astrophysics, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, High Energy Physics - Theory},\n year = 2001,\n month = dec,\n volume = {4},\n number = {1},\n eid = {1},\n pages = {1},\n doi = {10.12942/lrr-2001-1},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0004075},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001LRR.....4....1C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Perivolaropoulos2022,\n author = {{Perivolaropoulos}, L. and {Skara}, F.},\n title = \"{Challenges for {\\ensuremath{\\Lambda}}CDM: An update}\",\n journal = {\\nar},\n keywords = {Hubble tension, Cosmological parameters, Standard cosmological model, Cosmic microwave background, Hubble expansion, Cosmological perturbations, Tensions of LCDM, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, High Energy Physics - Theory},\n year = 2022,\n month = dec,\n volume = {95},\n eid = {101659},\n pages = {101659},\n doi = {10.1016/j.newar.2022.101659},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2105.05208},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022NewAR..9501659P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Naab&Ostriker2017,\n author = {{Naab}, Thorsten and {Ostriker}, Jeremiah P.},\n title = \"{Theoretical Challenges in Galaxy Formation}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = aug,\n volume = {55},\n number = {1},\n pages = {59-109},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1612.06891},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ARA&A..55...59N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Huertas&Lanusse2023,\n author = {{Huertas-Company}, M. and {Lanusse}, F.},\n title = \"{The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys}\",\n journal = {\\pasa},\n keywords = {methods: data analysis, cosmology: observations, cosmology: theory, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = jan,\n volume = {40},\n eid = {e001},\n pages = {e001},\n doi = {10.1017/pasa.2022.55},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2210.01813},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASA...40....1H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Asgari2023,\n author = {{Asgari}, Marika and {Mead}, Alexander J. and {Heymans}, Catherine},\n title = \"{The halo model for cosmology: a pedagogical review}\",\n journal = {The Open Journal of Astrophysics},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = nov,\n volume = {6},\n eid = {39},\n pages = {39},\n doi = {10.21105/astro.2303.08752},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2303.08752},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023OJAp....6E..39A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Shapley2011,\n author = {{Shapley}, Alice E.},\n title = \"{Physical Properties of Galaxies from z = 2-4}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = sep,\n volume = {49},\n number = {1},\n pages = {525-580},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102542},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1107.5060},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ARA&A..49..525S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Endsley2021,\n author = {{Endsley}, Ryan and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {Chevallard}, Jacopo and {Charlot}, St{\\'e}phane},\n title = \"{The [O III]+H {\\ensuremath{\\beta}} equivalent width distribution at z ≃ 7: implications for the contribution of galaxies to reionization}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, dark ages, reionization, first stars, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = jan,\n volume = {500},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5229-5248},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa3370},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2005.02402},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500.5229E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lotz2017,\n author = {{Lotz}, J.~M. and {Koekemoer}, A. and {Coe}, D. and {Grogin}, N. and {Capak}, P. and {Mack}, J. and {Anderson}, J. and {Avila}, R. and {Barker}, E.~A. and {Borncamp}, D. and {Brammer}, G. and {Durbin}, M. and {Gunning}, H. and {Hilbert}, B. and {Jenkner}, H. and {Khandrika}, H. and {Levay}, Z. and {Lucas}, R.~A. and {MacKenty}, J. and {Ogaz}, S. and {Porterfield}, B. and {Reid}, N. and {Robberto}, M. and {Royle}, P. and {Smith}, L.~J. and {Storrie-Lombardi}, L.~J. and {Sunnquist}, B. and {Surace}, J. and {Taylor}, D.~C. and {Williams}, R. and {Bullock}, J. and {Dickinson}, M. and {Finkelstein}, S. and {Natarajan}, P. and {Richard}, J. and {Robertson}, B. and {Tumlinson}, J. and {Zitrin}, A. and {Flanagan}, K. and {Sembach}, K. and {Soifer}, B.~T. and {Mountain}, M.},\n title = \"{The Frontier Fields: Survey Design and Initial Results}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2017,\n month = mar,\n volume = {837},\n number = {1},\n eid = {97},\n pages = {97},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/837/1/97},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1605.06567},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...837...97L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Whitler2024,\n author = {{Whitler}, Lily and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {Endsley}, Ryan and {Chen}, Zuyi and {Mason}, Charlotte and {Topping}, Michael W. and {Charlot}, St{\\'e}phane},\n title = \"{Insight from JWST/Near Infrared Camera into galaxy overdensities around bright Lyman-alpha emitters during reionization: implications for ionized bubbles at z 9}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: high-redshift, dark ages, reionization, first stars, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = apr,\n volume = {529},\n number = {2},\n pages = {855-872},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae516},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2305.16670},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529..855W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mason2018,\n author = {{Mason}, Charlotte A. and {Treu}, Tommaso and {Dijkstra}, Mark and {Mesinger}, Andrei and {Trenti}, Michele and {Pentericci}, Laura and {de Barros}, Stephane and {Vanzella}, Eros},\n title = \"{The Universe Is Reionizing at z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 7: Bayesian Inference of the IGM Neutral Fraction Using Ly{\\ensuremath{\\alpha}} Emission from Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark ages, reionization, first stars, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high redshift, intergalactic medium, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = mar,\n volume = {856},\n number = {1},\n eid = {2},\n pages = {2},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aab0a7},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1709.05356},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856....2M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mainali2018,\n author = {{Mainali}, Ramesh and {Zitrin}, Adi and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {Ellis}, Richard S. and {Richard}, Johan and {Tang}, Mengtao and {Laporte}, Nicolas and {Oesch}, Pascal and {McGreer}, Ian},\n title = \"{Spectroscopic constraints on UV metal line emission at z ≃ 6-9: the nature of Ly{\\ensuremath{\\alpha}} emitting galaxies in the reionization era}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Galaxy: evolution, Galaxy: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, intergalactic medium, quasars: emission lines, dark ages, reionization, first star, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = sep,\n volume = {479},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1180-1193},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty1640},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1804.00041},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.1180M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Topping2021,\n author = {{Topping}, Michael W. and {Shapley}, Alice E. and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {Endsley}, Ryan and {Robertson}, Brant and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Furlanetto}, Steven R. and {Tang}, Mengtao},\n title = \"{The Detection of Ionized Carbon Emission at z 8}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, High-redshift galaxies, 594, 734, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = aug,\n volume = {917},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L36},\n pages = {L36},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ac1a79},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2107.06295},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...917L..36T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Taniguchi2009,\n author = {{Taniguchi}, Y. and {Murayama}, T. and {Scoville}, N.~Z. and {Sasaki}, S.~S. and {Nagao}, T. and {Shioya}, Y. and {Saito}, T. and {Ideue}, Y. and {Nakajima}, A. and {Matsuoka}, K. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Aussel}, H. and {Capak}, P. and {Salvato}, M. and {Koekemoer}, A. and {Carilli}, C. and {Cimatti}, A. and {Ellis}, R.~S. and {Garilli}, B. and {Giavalisco}, M. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Impey}, C.~D. and {Kitzbichler}, M.~G. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Scarlata}, C. and {Schinnerer}, E. and {Smolcic}, V. and {Tribiano}, S. and {Trump}, J.~R.},\n title = \"{Hubble Space Telescope/Advanced Camera for Surveys Morphology of Ly{\\ensuremath{\\alpha}} Emitters at Redshift 5.7 in the COSMOS Field}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, early universe, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift},\n year = 2009,\n month = aug,\n volume = {701},\n number = {2},\n pages = {915-944},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/915},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...701..915T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Partridge1967,\n author = {{Partridge}, R.~B. and {Peebles}, P.~J.~E.},\n title = \"{Are Young Galaxies Visible?}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1967,\n month = mar,\n volume = {147},\n pages = {868},\n doi = {10.1086/149079},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967ApJ...147..868P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dey1998,\n author = {{Dey}, Arjun and {Spinrad}, Hyron and {Stern}, Daniel and {Graham}, James R. and {Chaffee}, Frederic H.},\n title = \"{A Galaxy at z = 5.34}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {COSMOLOGY: EARLY UNIVERSE, GALAXIES: FORMATION, GALAXIES: EVOLUTION, GALAXIES: DISTANCES AND REDSHIFTS, Galaxies: Distances and Redshifts, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Formation, Cosmology: Early Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 1998,\n month = may,\n volume = {498},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L93-L97},\n doi = {10.1086/311331},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9803137},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...498L..93D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ouchi2018,\n author = {{Ouchi}, Masami and {Harikane}, Yuichi and {Shibuya}, Takatoshi and {Shimasaku}, Kazuhiro and {Taniguchi}, Yoshiaki and {Konno}, Akira and {Kobayashi}, Masakazu and {Kajisawa}, Masaru and {Nagao}, Tohru and {Ono}, Yoshiaki and {Inoue}, Akio K. and {Umemura}, Masayuki and {Mori}, Masao and {Hasegawa}, Kenji and {Higuchi}, Ryo and {Komiyama}, Yutaka and {Matsuda}, Yuichi and {Nakajima}, Kimihiko and {Saito}, Tomoki and {Wang}, Shiang-Yu},\n title = \"{Systematic Identification of LAEs for Visible Exploration and Reionization Research Using Subaru HSC (SILVERRUSH). I. Program strategy and clustering properties of {\\ensuremath{\\sim}}2000 Ly{\\ensuremath{\\alpha}} emitters at z = 6-7 over the 0.3-0.5 Gpc$^{2}$ survey area}\",\n journal = {\\pasj},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = jan,\n volume = {70},\n eid = {S13},\n pages = {S13},\n doi = {10.1093/pasj/psx074},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1704.07455},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASJ...70S..13O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ouchi2020,\n author = {{Ouchi}, Masami and {Ono}, Yoshiaki and {Shibuya}, Takatoshi},\n title = \"{Observations of the Lyman-{\\ensuremath{\\alpha}} Universe}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2020,\n month = aug,\n volume = {58},\n pages = {617-659},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021859},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2012.07960},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58..617O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Klessen&Glover2023,\n author = {{Klessen}, Ralf S. and {Glover}, Simon C.~O.},\n title = \"{The First Stars: Formation, Properties, and Impact}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = aug,\n volume = {61},\n pages = {65-130},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-053453},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2303.12500},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ARA&A..61...65K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Robertson2022,\n author = {{Robertson}, Brant E.},\n title = \"{Galaxy Formation and Reionization: Key Unknowns and Expected Breakthroughs by the James Webb Space Telescope}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = aug,\n volume = {60},\n pages = {121-158},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev-astro-120221-044656},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2110.13160},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ARA&A..60..121R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bullock&BoylanKolchin2017,\n author = {{Bullock}, James S. and {Boylan-Kolchin}, Michael},\n title = \"{Small-Scale Challenges to the {\\ensuremath{\\Lambda}}CDM Paradigm}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology},\n year = 2017,\n month = aug,\n volume = {55},\n number = {1},\n pages = {343-387},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1707.04256},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ARA&A..55..343B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Conselice2014,\n author = {{Conselice}, Christopher J.},\n title = \"{The Evolution of Galaxy Structure Over Cosmic Time}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = aug,\n volume = {52},\n pages = {291-337},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040037},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1403.2783},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ARA&A..52..291C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wechsler&Tinker2018,\n author = {{Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Tinker}, Jeremy L.},\n title = \"{The Connection Between Galaxies and Their Dark Matter Halos}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = sep,\n volume = {56},\n pages = {435-487},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051756},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1804.03097},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ARA&A..56..435W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Stark2025,\n author = {{Stark}, Daniel P. and {Topping}, Michael W. and {Endsley}, Ryan and {Tang}, Mengtao},\n title = \"{Observations of the first galaxies in the Era of JWST}\",\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n booktitle = {Encyclopedia of Astrophysics, Volume 4},\n year = 2026,\n volume = {4},\n month = jan,\n pages = {453-499},\n doi = {10.1016/B978-0-443-21439-4.00128-0},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2501.17078},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026enap....4..453S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Cooray&Sheth02,\n author = {{Cooray}, Asantha and {Sheth}, Ravi},\n title = \"{Halo models of large scale structure}\",\n journal = {\\physrep},\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n year = 2002,\n month = dec,\n volume = {372},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1-129},\n doi = {10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00276-4},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0206508},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002PhR...372....1C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@BOOK{Peebles1993,\n author = {{Peebles}, P.~J.~E.},\n title = \"{Principles of Physical Cosmology}\",\n year = 1993,\n doi = {10.1515/9780691206721},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ppc..book.....P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@BOOK{Mo2010,\n author = {{Mo}, Houjun and {van den Bosch}, Frank C. and {White}, Simon},\n title = \"{Galaxy Formation and Evolution}\",\n year = 2010,\n doi = {10.1017/CBO9780511807244},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010gfe..book.....M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{McKee&Ostriker2007,\n author = {{McKee}, Christopher F. and {Ostriker}, Eve C.},\n title = \"{Theory of Star Formation}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = sep,\n volume = {45},\n number = {1},\n pages = {565-687},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0707.3514},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ARA&A..45..565M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Krumholz2015,\n author = {{Krumholz}, Mark R.},\n title = \"{Notes on Star Formation}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = nov,\n eid = {arXiv:1511.03457},\n pages = {arXiv:1511.03457},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.1511.03457},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1511.03457},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015arXiv151103457K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Somerville&Dave2015,\n author = {{Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel},\n title = \"{Physical Models of Galaxy Formation in a Cosmological Framework}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = aug,\n volume = {53},\n pages = {51-113},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1412.2712},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ARA&A..53...51S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n%---------------------------------- COSMOS-Web and COSMOS data and results ----------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{Jego2026,\n author = {{Jego}, Baptiste and {B{\\'e}thermin}, Matthieu and {Kraljic}, Katarina and {Laigle}, Clotilde and {Wang}, Lingyu and {La Marca}, Antonio and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Leroy}, Gavin and {Hadi}, Ali and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Toni}, Greta and {Xu}, Can},\n title = \"{The impact of cosmic filaments on starburst galaxies across cosmic times}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2026,\n month = feb,\n eid = {arXiv:2602.21890},\n pages = {arXiv:2602.21890},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2602.21890},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2602.21890},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260221890J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Hatamnia2026,\n author = {{Hatamnia}, Hossein and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Taamoli}, Sina and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Brinch}, Malte and {Chartab}, Nima and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Giddings}, Finn and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Hadi}, Ali and {Haghjoo}, Aryana and {Harish}, Santosh and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Jablonka}, Pascale L. and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Khostovan}, Ali Ahmad and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Laishram}, Ronaldo and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Maturi}, Matteo and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Martin}, Crystal L. and {Moscardini}, Lauro and {Scognamiglio}, Diana and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Toni}, Greta and {de la Vega}, Alexander and {Weaver}, John R. and {Yang}, Lilan},\n title = \"{Large-scale Structure in COSMOS-Web: Tracing Galaxy Evolution in the Cosmic Web up to z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 7 with the Largest JWST Survey}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Large-scale structure of the universe, Galaxy evolution, Star formation, Quenched galaxies, 902, 594, 1569, 2016, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2026,\n month = may,\n volume = {1002},\n number = {2},\n eid = {192},\n pages = {192},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ae5bac},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2511.10727},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ..1002..192H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Toni2026a,\n author = {{Toni}, Greta and {Maturi}, Matteo and {Castignani}, Gianluca and {Moscardini}, Lauro and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Finoguenov}, Alexis and {Taamoli}, Sina and {Gentile}, Fabrizio and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Arango-Toro}, Rafael C. and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Flayhart}, Carter and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Hadi}, Ali and {Haghjoo}, Aryana and {Harish}, Santosh and {Hatamnia}, Hossein and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Khostovan}, Ali Ahmad and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Leroy}, Gavin and {Magdis}, Georgios E. and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {McKinney}, Jed and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Rich}, R. Michael and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Samir}, Rasha M. and {Scognamiglio}, Diana and {Shamyati}, Samaneh and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Zavala}, Jorge A.},\n title = \"{COSMOS-Web galaxy groups: Evolution of red sequence and quiescent galaxy fraction}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: groups: general, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: star formation, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics of Galaxies, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2026,\n month = feb,\n volume = {707},\n eid = {A87},\n pages = {A87},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202557183},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2509.08040},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026A&A...707A..87T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Toni2026,\n author = {{Toni}, Greta and {Castignani}, Gianluca and {Combes}, Fran{\\c{c}}oise and {Salom{\\'e}}, Philippe and {Bongiovanni}, Angel and {Moscardini}, Lauro and {Maturi}, Matteo},\n title = \"{Molecular gas properties of star-forming brightest group galaxies at $z \\sim 0.3$}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics of Galaxies, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2026,\n month = may,\n eid = {arXiv:2605.21592},\n pages = {arXiv:2605.21592},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2605.21592},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2605.21592},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260521592T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Scognamiglio2026,\n author = {{Scognamiglio}, Diana and {Leroy}, Gavin and {Harvey}, David and {Massey}, Richard and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Brinch}, Malte and {Berman}, Edward and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Fung}, Leo W.~H. and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {He}, Qiuhan and {Hatamnia}, Hossein and {Huff}, Eric and {Hogg}, Natalie B. and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Jin}, Shouwen and {Lambrides}, Erini and {Leauthaud}, Alexie and {Lentz}, Zane D. and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Mahler}, Guillaume and {Maraston}, Claudia and {Martin}, Crystal L. and {McCleary}, Jacqueline and {Nightingale}, James and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Pires}, Sandrine and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Sanders}, David B. and {Scarlata}, Claudia and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Toni}, Greta and {von Wietersheim-Kramsta}, Maximilian and {Weaver}, John R.},\n title = \"{An ultra-high-resolution map of (dark) matter}\",\n journal = {Nature Astronomy},\n keywords = {Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2026,\n month = jan,\n doi = {10.1038/s41550-025-02763-9},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2601.17239},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026NatAs.tmp...25S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Drakos2022,\n author = {{Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Villasenor}, Bruno and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Hausen}, Ryan and {Dickinson}, Mark E. and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Furlanetto}, Steven R. and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Madau}, Piero and {Shapley}, Alice E. and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {Wechsler}, Risa H.},\n title = \"{Deep Realistic Extragalactic Model (DREaM) Galaxy Catalogs: Predictions for a Roman Ultra-deep Field}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {594, 1383, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2022,\n month = feb,\n volume = {926},\n number = {2},\n eid = {194},\n pages = {194},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac46fb},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2110.10703},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...926..194D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sanders2007,\n author = {{Sanders}, D.~B. and {Salvato}, M. and {Aussel}, H. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Scoville}, N. and {Surace}, J.~A. and {Frayer}, D.~T. and {Sheth}, K. and {Helou}, G. and {Brooke}, T. and {Bhattacharya}, B. and {Yan}, L. and {Kartaltepe}, J.~S. and {Barnes}, J.~E. and {Blain}, A.~W. and {Calzetti}, D. and {Capak}, P. and {Carilli}, C. and {Carollo}, C.~M. and {Comastri}, A. and {Daddi}, E. and {Ellis}, R.~S. and {Elvis}, M. and {Fall}, S.~M. and {Franceschini}, A. and {Giavalisco}, M. and {Hasinger}, G. and {Impey}, C. and {Koekemoer}, A. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Lilly}, S. and {Liu}, M.~C. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Renzini}, A. and {Rich}, M. and {Schinnerer}, E. and {Shopbell}, P.~L. and {Taniguchi}, Y. and {Thompson}, D.~J. and {Urry}, C.~M. and {Williams}, J.~P.},\n title = \"{S-COSMOS: The Spitzer Legacy Survey of the Hubble Space Telescope ACS 2 deg$^{2}$ COSMOS Field I: Survey Strategy and First Analysis}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Formation, Infrared: Galaxies, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Surveys, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = sep,\n volume = {172},\n number = {1},\n pages = {86-98},\n doi = {10.1086/517885},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0701318},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..172...86S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Marchesi2016,\n author = {{Marchesi}, S. and {Civano}, F. and {Elvis}, M. and {Salvato}, M. and {Brusa}, M. and {Comastri}, A. and {Gilli}, R. and {Hasinger}, G. and {Lanzuisi}, G. and {Miyaji}, T. and {Treister}, E. and {Urry}, C.~M. and {Vignali}, C. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Allevato}, V. and {Cappelluti}, N. and {Cardamone}, C. and {Finoguenov}, A. and {Griffiths}, R.~E. and {Karim}, A. and {Laigle}, C. and {LaMassa}, S.~M. and {Jahnke}, K. and {Ranalli}, P. and {Schawinski}, K. and {Schinnerer}, E. and {Silverman}, J.~D. and {Smolcic}, V. and {Suh}, H. and {Trakhtenbrot}, B.},\n title = \"{The Chandra COSMOS Legacy survey: optical/IR identifications}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {catalogs, cosmology: observations, galaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, surveys, X-rays: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = jan,\n volume = {817},\n number = {1},\n eid = {34},\n pages = {34},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/34},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1512.01105},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...817...34M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{LeFevre2020,\n author = {{Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {B{\\'e}thermin}, M. and {Faisst}, A. and {Jones}, G.~C. and {Capak}, P. and {Cassata}, P. and {Silverman}, J.~D. and {Schaerer}, D. and {Yan}, L. and {Amorin}, R. and {Bardelli}, S. and {Boquien}, M. and {Cimatti}, A. and {Dessauges-Zavadsky}, M. and {Giavalisco}, M. and {Hathi}, N.~P. and {Fudamoto}, Y. and {Fujimoto}, S. and {Ginolfi}, M. and {Gruppioni}, C. and {Hemmati}, S. and {Ibar}, E. and {Koekemoer}, A. and {Khusanova}, Y. and {Lagache}, G. and {Lemaux}, B.~C. and {Loiacono}, F. and {Maiolino}, R. and {Mancini}, C. and {Narayanan}, D. and {Morselli}, L. and {M{\\'e}ndez-Hern{\\`a}ndez}, Hugo and {Oesch}, P.~A. and {Pozzi}, F. and {Romano}, M. and {Riechers}, D. and {Scoville}, N. and {Talia}, M. and {Tasca}, L.~A.~M. and {Thomas}, R. and {Toft}, S. and {Vallini}, L. and {Vergani}, D. and {Walter}, F. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Zucca}, E.},\n title = \"{The ALPINE-ALMA [CII] survey. Survey strategy, observations, and sample properties of 118 star-forming galaxies at 4 < z < 6}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: formation, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = nov,\n volume = {643},\n eid = {A1},\n pages = {A1},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201936965},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1910.09517},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A...1L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Capak2007,\n author = {{Capak}, P. and {Aussel}, H. and {Ajiki}, M. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Scoville}, N. and {Shopbell}, P. and {Taniguchi}, Y. and {Thompson}, D. and {Tribiano}, S. and {Sasaki}, S. and {Blain}, A.~W. and {Brusa}, M. and {Carilli}, C. and {Comastri}, A. and {Carollo}, C.~M. and {Cassata}, P. and {Colbert}, J. and {Ellis}, R.~S. and {Elvis}, M. and {Giavalisco}, M. and {Green}, W. and {Guzzo}, L. and {Hasinger}, G. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Impey}, C. and {Jahnke}, K. and {Kartaltepe}, J. and {Kneib}, J. -P. and {Koda}, J. and {Koekemoer}, A. and {Komiyama}, Y. and {Leauthaud}, A. and {Le Fevre}, O. and {Lilly}, S. and {Liu}, C. and {Massey}, R. and {Miyazaki}, S. and {Murayama}, T. and {Nagao}, T. and {Peacock}, J.~A. and {Pickles}, A. and {Porciani}, C. and {Renzini}, A. and {Rhodes}, J. and {Rich}, M. and {Salvato}, M. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Scarlata}, C. and {Schiminovich}, D. and {Schinnerer}, E. and {Scodeggio}, M. and {Sheth}, K. and {Shioya}, Y. and {Tasca}, L.~A.~M. and {Taylor}, J.~E. and {Yan}, L. and {Zamorani}, G.},\n title = \"{The First Release COSMOS Optical and Near-IR Data and Catalog}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Galaxies: Evolution, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Surveys, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = sep,\n volume = {172},\n number = {1},\n pages = {99-116},\n doi = {10.1086/519081},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0704.2430},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..172...99C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Gozaliasl2025,\n author = {{Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Yang}, Lilan and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Toni}, Greta and {Abedini}, Fatemeh and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Allen}, Natalie and {Arango-Toro}, Rafael C. and {Babul}, Arif and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Chartab}, Nima and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Finoguenov}, Alexis and {Flayhart}, Carter and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Ghaffari}, Zohreh and {Leroy}, Gavin and {Haghjoo}, Aryana and {Haghi}, Hosein and {Harish}, Santosh and {Zonoozi}, Akram Hasani and {Hasinger}, G{\\\"u}nther and {Hatamnia}, Hossein and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Kakkad}, Darshan and {Kalantari}, Atousa and {Khostovan}, Ali Ahmad and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Korpi-Lagg}, Maarit and {Laigle}, Clotilde and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Magdis}, Georgios and {Maturi}, Matteo and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {McKinney}, Jed and {McMahon}, Nicolas and {Mercier}, Wilfried and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Moscardini}, Lauro and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Puglisi}, Annagrazia and {Samir}, Rasha M. and {Sanjaripour}, Sogol and {Sargent}, Mark and {Sattari}, Zahra and {Scognamiglio}, Diana and {Scoville}, Nick and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Sanders}, David B. and {Taamoli}, Sina and {Toft}, Sune and {Vardoulaki}, Eleni},\n title = \"{Brightest group galaxies in COSMOS-Web: Evolution of the size-mass relation since z = 3.7}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: groups: general, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics of Galaxies, 85A40, 68T07, J.2; I.2.6},\n year = 2025,\n month = nov,\n volume = {703},\n eid = {A129},\n pages = {A129},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202556085},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2506.04031},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...703A.129G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Harish2025,\n author = {{Harish}, Santosh and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Engesser}, Mike and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Martin}, Crystal L. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Lambrides}, Erini and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {McKinney}, Jed and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Robertson}, Brant E.},\n title = \"{COSMOS-Web: MIRI Data Reduction and Number Counts at 7.7 {\\ensuremath{\\mu}}m Using JWST}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {James Webb Space Telescope, Galaxy evolution, Astronomy data reduction, Infrared photometry, Infrared sources, Galaxy counts, 2291, 594, 1861, 792, 793, 588, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = oct,\n volume = {992},\n number = {1},\n eid = {45},\n pages = {45},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/adfa1e},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2506.03306},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...992...45H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Franco2025,\n author = {{Franco}, Maximilien and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Harish}, Santosh and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Arango-Toro}, Rafael C. and {Battisti}, Andrew J. and {Chartab}, Nima and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Flayhart}, Carter and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Massey}, Richard and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Sattari}, Zahra and {Scognamiglio}, Diana and {Weaver}, John R. and {Yang}, Lilan and {Zavala}, Jorge A. and {Berman}, Edward M. and {Gentile}, Fabrizio and {Gillman}, Steven and {Long}, Arianna S. and {Magdis}, Georgios and {McCleary}, Jacqueline E. and {McKinney}, Jed and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Rest}, Armin and {Sanders}, David B. and {Toft}, Sune and {Yu}, Si-Yue},\n title = \"{COSMOS-Web: Comprehensive Data Reduction for Wide-area JWST NIRCam Imaging}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {James Webb Space Telescope, Astronomy data reduction, Surveys, Near infrared astronomy, 2291, 1861, 1671, 1093, Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2026,\n month = mar,\n volume = {999},\n number = {2},\n eid = {200},\n pages = {200},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ae3aa1},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2506.03256},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ...999..200F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Shuntov2025d,\n author = {{Shuntov}, Marko and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Arango-Toro}, Rafael C. and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Harish}, Santosh and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Yang}, Lilan and {Huertas-Company}, Marc and {Berman}, Edward M. and {McCleary}, Jacqueline E. and {Toft}, Sune and {Gavazzi}, Rapha{\\\"e}l and {Achenbach}, Mark J. and {Bertin}, Emmanuel and {Brinch}, Malte and {Champagne}, Jackie and {Chartab}, Nima and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Egami}, Eiichi and {Endsley}, Ryan and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Fan}, Xiaohui and {Flayhart}, Carter and {Hartley}, William G. and {Hatamnia}, Hossein and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Gentile}, Fabrizio and {Jermann}, Iris and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Kakiichi}, Koki and {Khostovan}, Ali Ahmad and {K{\\\"u}mmel}, Martin and {Laigle}, Clotilde and {Laishram}, Ronaldo and {Lambrides}, Erini and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Lyu}, Jianwei and {Magdis}, Georgios and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Moutard}, Thibaud and {Renzini}, Alvio and {Rich}, R. Michael and {Sanders}, David B. and {Sattari}, Zahra and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Schefer}, Marc and {Scognamiglio}, Diana and {Scoville}, Nick and {Silverman}, John D. and {Taamoli}, Sina and {Trakhtenbrot}, Benny and {Valentino}, Francesco and {Wang}, Feige and {Weaver}, John R. and {Yang}, Jinyi},\n title = \"{COSMOS2025: The COSMOS-Web galaxy catalog of photometry, morphology, redshifts, and physical parameters from JWST, HST, and ground-based imaging}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {catalogs, surveys, galaxies: distances and redshifts, galaxies: photometry, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = dec,\n volume = {704},\n eid = {A339},\n pages = {A339},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202555799},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2506.03243},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...704A.339S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Pierel2025,\n author = {{Pierel}, J.~D.~R. and {Coulter}, D.~A. and {Siebert}, M.~R. and {Akins}, H.~B. and {Engesser}, M. and {Fox}, O.~D. and {Franco}, M. and {Rest}, A. and {Agrawal}, A. and {Ajay}, Y. and {Allen}, N. and {Casey}, C.~M. and {DeCoursey}, C. and {Drakos}, N.~E. and {Egami}, E. and {Faisst}, A.~L. and {Gezari}, S. and {Gozaliasl}, G. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Jones}, D.~O. and {Karmen}, M. and {Kartaltepe}, J.~S. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Lane}, Z.~G. and {Larson}, R.~L. and {Li}, T. and {Liu}, D. and {Moriya}, T.~J. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Paquereau}, L. and {Quimby}, R.~M. and {Rich}, R.~M. and {Rhodes}, J. and {Robertson}, B.~E. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Shahbandeh}, M. and {Shuntov}, M. and {Silverman}, J.~D. and {Strolger}, L.~G. and {Toft}, S. and {Zenati}, Y.},\n title = \"{Testing for Intrinsic Type Ia Supernova Luminosity Evolution at z > 2 with JWST}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Type Ia supernovae, Cosmology, Cosmological evolution, Galaxy evolution, 1728, 343, 336, 594, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = mar,\n volume = {981},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L9},\n pages = {L9},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/adb1d9},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2411.11953},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...981L...9P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kaminsky2025,\n author = {{Kaminsky}, Aidan J. and {Cappelluti}, Nico and {Hasinger}, G{\\\"u}nther and {Peca}, Alessandro and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Cerini}, Giulia and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Kashlinsky}, Alexander and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Sterling}, Joseph},\n title = \"{Tracing High-z Galaxies in X-Rays with JWST and Chandra}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmic background radiation, Large-scale structure of the universe, Active galactic nuclei, Star formation, 317, 902, 16, 1569, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = jul,\n volume = {987},\n number = {1},\n eid = {40},\n pages = {40},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/adcede},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2502.09705},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...987...40K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Gentile2025,\n author = {{Gentile}, Fabrizio and {Talia}, Margherita and {Enia}, Andrea and {Pozzi}, Francesca and {Traina}, Alberto and {Zamorani}, Giovanni and {Andika}, Irham T. and {Behiri}, Meriem and {Barrufet}, Laia and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Cimatti}, Andrea and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Gillman}, Steven and {Giulietti}, Marika and {Gottumukkala}, Rashmi and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Lapi}, Andrea and {McKinney}, Jed and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Vaccari}, Mattia and {Vignali}, Cristian and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Allen}, Natalie and {Harish}, Santosh and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Rich}, Micheal R. and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Toft}, Sune},\n title = \"{Going deeper into the dark with COSMOS-Web: JWST unveils the total contribution of radio-selected NIR-faint galaxies to the cosmic star formation rate density}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: ISM, galaxies: starburst, infrared: galaxies, submillimeter: galaxies, Astrophysics of Galaxies, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = may,\n volume = {697},\n eid = {A46},\n pages = {A46},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202452461},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2503.00112},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...697A..46G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Gentile2024,\n author = {{Gentile}, Fabrizio and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {McKinney}, Jed and {Berman}, Edward and {Cooper}, Olivia R. and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Long}, Arianna S. and {Magdis}, Georgios and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Talia}, Margherita and {Allen}, Natalie and {Harish}, Santosh and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Rich}, Michael R. and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Toft}, Sune and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem},\n title = \"{Not-so-little Red Dots: Two Massive and Dusty Starbursts at z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 5{\\textendash}7 Pushing the Limits of Star Formation Discovered by JWST in the COSMOS-Web Survey}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy formation, High-redshift galaxies, Star formation, Galaxies, 594, 595, 734, 1569, 573, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = sep,\n volume = {973},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L2},\n pages = {L2},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ad738a},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2408.10305},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...973L...2G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mahler2025,\n author = {{Mahler}, Guillaume and {Nightingale}, James W. and {Hogg}, Natalie B. and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {McCleary}, Jacqueline and {He}, Qiuhan and {Berman}, Edward and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Massey}, Richard J. and {Mercier}, Wilfried and {Scognamiglio}, Diana and {Shuntov}, Marko and {von Wietersheim-Kramsta}, Maximilian and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Allen}, Natalie and {Toft}, Sune and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Rhodes}, Jason D. and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Zavala}, Jorge A. and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Magdis}, Georgios E. and {Jin}, Shuowen},\n title = \"{The COSMOS-Web Lens Survey (COWLS) II: Depth, resolution, and NIR coverage from JWST reveals 17 spectacular lenses}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Gravitational lensing: strong, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics of Galaxies, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = nov,\n volume = {544},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L8-L14},\n doi = {10.1093/mnrasl/slaf088},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2503.08782},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.544L...8M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hogg2025,\n author = {{Hogg}, Natalie B and {Nightingale}, James W and {He}, Quihan and {McCleary}, Jacqueline and {Mahler}, Guillaume and {Amvrosiadis}, Aristeidis and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Berman}, Edward and {Massey}, Richard J and {Scognamiglio}, Diana and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Allen}, Natalie and {Toft}, Sune and {Akins}, Hollis B and {Casey}, Caitlin M and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S and {Koekemoer}, Anton M and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Rhodes}, Jason D and {Robertson}, Brant E and {Drakos}, Nicole E and {Faisst}, Andreas L and {Hatamnia}, Hossein and {Newman}, Sophie L},\n title = \"{The COSMOS-Web Lens Survey(COWLS) III: forecasts versus data}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: strong, methods: statistical, cosmology: observations, Astrophysics of Galaxies, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = nov,\n volume = {544},\n number = {1},\n pages = {782-798},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staf1678},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2503.08785},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.544..782H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Faisst2025,\n author = {{Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Yang}, Lilan and {Brinch}, M. and {Casey}, C.~M. and {Chartab}, N. and {Dessauges-Zavadsky}, M. and {Drakos}, N.~E. and {Gillman}, S. and {Gozaliasl}, G. and {Hayward}, C.~C. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Jablonka}, P. and {Kaminsky}, A. and {Kartaltepe}, J.~S. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Kokorev}, V. and {Lambrides}, E. and {Liu}, D. and {Maraston}, C. and {Martin}, C.~L. and {Renzini}, A. and {Robertson}, B.~E. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Sattari}, Z. and {Scoville}, N. and {Urry}, C.~M. and {Vijayan}, A.~P. and {Weaver}, J.~R. and {Akins}, H.~B. and {Allen}, N. and {Arango-Toro}, R.~C. and {Cooper}, O.~R. and {Franco}, M. and {Gentile}, F. and {Harish}, S. and {Hirschmann}, M. and {Khostovan}, A.~A. and {Laigle}, C. and {Larson}, R.~L. and {Lee}, M. and {Liu}, Z. and {Long}, A.~S. and {Magdis}, G. and {Massey}, R. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {McKinney}, J. and {Paquereau}, L. and {Rhodes}, J. and {Rich}, R.~M. and {Shuntov}, M. and {Silverman}, J.~D. and {Talia}, M. and {Toft}, S. and {Zavala}, J.~A.},\n title = \"{COSMOS-Web: The Role of Galaxy Interactions and Disk Instabilities in Producing Starbursts at z < 4}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Starburst galaxies, Galaxy interactions, Galaxy disks, 1570, 600, 589, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = feb,\n volume = {980},\n number = {2},\n eid = {204},\n pages = {204},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ada566},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2405.09619},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...980..204F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Silverman2023,\n author = {{Silverman}, John D. and {Mainieri}, Vincenzo and {Ding}, Xuheng and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Jahnke}, Knud and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan and {Lambrides}, Erini and {Onoue}, Masafusa and {Trakhtenbrot}, Benny and {Vardoulaki}, Eleni and {Bongiorno}, Angela and {Casey}, Caitlin and {Civano}, Francesca and {Faisst}, Andreas and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Gillman}, Steven and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Magdis}, Georgios and {Marchesi}, Stefano and {Rich}, Robert Michael and {Sparre}, Martin and {Suh}, Hyewon and {Tanaka}, Takumi and {Valentino}, Francesco},\n title = \"{Resolving Galactic-scale Obscuration of X-Ray AGNs at z {\\ensuremath{\\gtrsim}} 1 with COSMOS-Web}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {X-ray active galactic nuclei, Galactic and extragalactic astronomy, AGN host galaxies, Infrared astronomy, 2035, 563, 2017, 786, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = jul,\n volume = {951},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L41},\n pages = {L41},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/acdef4},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2306.03205},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...951L..41S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{McKinney2025,\n author = {{McKinney}, Jed and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Long}, Arianna S. and {Cooper}, Olivia R. and {Manning}, Sinclaire M. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Akins}, Hollis and {Lambrides}, Erini and {Gammon}, Elaine and {Silva}, Camila and {Gentile}, Fabrizio and {Zavala}, Jorge A. and {Amvrosiadis}, Aristeidis and {Andika}, Irham and {Brinch}, Malte and {Champagne}, Jaclyn B. and {Chartab}, Nima and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Gillman}, Steven and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Greve}, Thomas R. and {Harish}, Santosh and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Kalita}, Boris S. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Magdis}, Georgios and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Talia}, Margherita and {Valentino}, Francesco and {Vijayan}, Aswin P.},\n title = \"{SCUBADive. I. JWST+ALMA Analysis of 289 Submillimeter Galaxies in COSMOS-web}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Observational astronomy, High-redshift galaxies, Submillimeter astronomy, 594, 1145, 734, 1647, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = feb,\n volume = {979},\n number = {2},\n eid = {229},\n pages = {229},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ada357},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2408.08346},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...979..229M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mercier2024,\n author = {{Mercier}, W. and {Shuntov}, M. and {Gavazzi}, R. and {Nightingale}, J.~W. and {Arango}, R. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Amvrosiadis}, A. and {Ciesla}, L. and {Casey}, C.~M. and {Jin}, S. and {Faisst}, A.~L. and {Andika}, I.~T. and {Drakos}, N.~E. and {Enia}, A. and {Franco}, M. and {Gillman}, S. and {Gozaliasl}, G. and {Hayward}, C.~C. and {Huertas-Company}, M. and {Kartaltepe}, J.~S. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Laigle}, C. and {Le Borgne}, D. and {Magdis}, G. and {Mahler}, G. and {Maraston}, C. and {Martin}, C.~L. and {Massey}, R. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Moutard}, T. and {Paquereau}, L. and {Rhodes}, J.~D. and {Robertson}, B.~E. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Toft}, S. and {Trebitsch}, M. and {Tresse}, L. and {Vijayan}, A.~P.},\n title = \"{The COSMOS-Web ring: In-depth characterization of an Einstein ring lensing system at z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 2}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {gravitation, gravitational lensing: strong, galaxies: distances and redshifts, galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD, galaxies: halos, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jul,\n volume = {687},\n eid = {A61},\n pages = {A61},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202348095},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2309.15986},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...687A..61M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Shuntov2025c,\n author = {{Shuntov}, Marko and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Mercier}, Wilfried and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Larson}, Rebecca and {Khostovan}, Ali Ahmad and {Gavazzi}, Rapha{\\\"e}l and {Nightingale}, James W. and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Arango-Toro}, Rafael and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Ciesla}, Laure and {Magdis}, Georgios E. and {Amvrosiadis}, Aristeidis and {Enia}, Andrea and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Laigle}, Clotilde and {Le Borgne}, Damien and {Massey}, Richard and {Moutard}, Thibaud and {Vaccari}, Mattia},\n title = \"{The COSMOS-Web ring: Spectroscopic confirmation of the background source at z = 5.1}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: distances and redshifts, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = apr,\n volume = {696},\n eid = {L14},\n pages = {L14},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202554273},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2502.20136},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...696L..14S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Nightingale2025,\n author = {{Nightingale}, James W. and {Mahler}, Guillaume and {McCleary}, Jacqueline and {He}, Qiuhan and {Hogg}, Natalie B. and {Amvrosiadis}, Aristeidis and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Mercier}, Wilfried and {Scognamiglio}, Diana and {Berman}, Edward and {Leroy}, Gavin and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Massey}, Richard J. and {Shuntov}, Marko and {von Wietersheim-Kramsta}, Maximilian and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Allen}, Natalie and {Toft}, Sune and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Rhodes}, Jason D. and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Jin}, Shuowen},\n title = \"{The COSMOS-Web Lens Survey (COWLS) I: discovery of >100 high redshift strong lenses in contiguous JWST imaging}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {astroparticle physics, gravitational lensing: strong, dark matter, Astrophysics of Galaxies, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = oct,\n volume = {543},\n number = {1},\n pages = {203-222},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staf1253},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2503.08777},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.543..203N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Karmen2025,\n author = {{Karmen}, Mitchell and {Gezari}, Suvi and {Lambrides}, Erini and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Norman}, Colin and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Pierel}, Justin and {Coulter}, David and {Rest}, Armin and {Fox}, Dr., Ori and {Ajay}, Yukta and {Allen}, Natalie and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Gomez}, Sebastian and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Lane}, Zachary G. and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Siebert}, Matthew R. and {Toft}, Sune and {Wevers}, Thomas and {Zenati}, Yossef},\n title = \"{JWST Discovery of a High-redshift Tidal Disruption Event Candidate in COSMOS-Web}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Tidal disruption, Supermassive black holes, James Webb Space Telescope, 1696, 1663, 2291, High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = sep,\n volume = {990},\n number = {2},\n eid = {149},\n pages = {149},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/adf216},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2504.13248},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...990..149K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lambrides2024a,\n author = {{Lambrides}, Erini and {Chiaberge}, Marco and {Long}, Arianna S. and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Ptak}, Andrew F. and {Andika}, Irham Taufik and {Capetti}, Alessandro and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Champagne}, Jaclyn B. and {Chworowsky}, Katherine and {Clarke}, Tracy E. and {Cooper}, Olivia R. and {Ding}, Xuheng and {Dong}, Dillon Z. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Forman}, Jordan Y. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Gillman}, Steven and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Hall}, Kirsten R. and {Harish}, Santosh and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Hutchison}, Taylor A. and {Jahnke}, Knud and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Kleiner}, Emma T. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Manning}, Sinclaire M. and {Martin}, Crystal L. and {McKinney}, Jed and {Norman}, Colin and {Nyland}, Kristina and {Onoue}, Masafusa and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Silverman}, John D. and {Stiavelli}, Massimo and {Trakhtenbrot}, Benny and {Vardoulaki}, Eleni and {Zavala}, Jorge A. and {Allen}, Natalie and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Toft}, Sune},\n title = \"{Uncovering a Massive z 7.7 Galaxy Hosting a Heavily Obscured Radio-loud Active Galactic Nucleus Candidate in COSMOS-Web}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Quasars, Radio loud quasars, Active galactic nuclei, Supermassive black holes, Reionization, High-redshift galaxies, 1319, 1349, 16, 1663, 1383, 734, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jan,\n volume = {961},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L25},\n pages = {L25},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ad11ee},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2308.12823},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961L..25L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Akins2023,\n author = {{Akins}, Hollis B. and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Allen}, Natalie and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Harish}, Santosh and {Arrabal Haro}, Pablo and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Long}, Arianna S. and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Papovich}, Casey and {Pirzkal}, Nor and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Toft}, Sune and {Yang}, Guang and {Barro}, Guillermo and {Bisigello}, Laura and {Buat}, V{\\'e}ronique and {Champagne}, Jaclyn B. and {Cooper}, Olivia and {Costantin}, Luca and {de La Vega}, Alexander and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Gillman}, Steven and {G{\\'o}mez-Guijarro}, Carlos and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Hathi}, Nimish P. and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Holwerda}, Benne W. and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Lambrides}, Erini and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {Magdis}, Georgios E. and {Magnelli}, Benjamin and {McKinney}, Jed and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Rich}, R. Michael and {Seill{\\'e}}, Lise-Marie and {Talia}, Margherita and {Urry}, C. Megan and {Valentino}, Francesco and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron and {Zavala}, Jorge and {Cosmos-Web Team} and {Ceers Team}},\n title = \"{Two Massive, Compact, and Dust-obscured Candidate z ≃ 8 Galaxies Discovered by JWST}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy formation, High-redshift galaxies, Galaxies, 594, 595, 734, 573, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = oct,\n volume = {956},\n number = {1},\n eid = {61},\n pages = {61},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/acef21},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2304.12347},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...956...61A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Yang2025,\n author = {{Yang}, Lilan and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Ding}, Xuheng and {Achenbach}, Mark J. and {Arango-Toro}, Rafael C. and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Gillman}, Steven and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Huertas-Company}, Marc and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Magdis}, Georgios and {Massey}, Richard and {Silverman}, John D. and {Tanaka}, Takumi S. and {Yu}, Si-Yue and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Allen}, Natalie and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Toft}, Sune},\n title = \"{COSMOS-Web: Unraveling the Evolution of Galaxy Size and Related Properties at 2 < z < 10}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy structure, 594, 622, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = dec,\n volume = {281},\n number = {2},\n eid = {68},\n pages = {68},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4365/ae0e1b},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2504.07185},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJS..281...68Y},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{HuertasCompany2025,\n author = {{Huertas-Company}, M. and {Shuntov}, M. and {Dong}, Y. and {Walmsley}, M. and {Ilbert}, O. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Akins}, H.~B. and {Allen}, N. and {Casey}, C.~M. and {Costantin}, L. and {Daddi}, E. and {Dekel}, A. and {Franco}, M. and {Garland}, I.~L. and {G{\\'e}ron}, T. and {Gozaliasl}, G. and {Hirschmann}, M. and {Kartaltepe}, J.~S. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Lintott}, C. and {Liu}, D. and {Lucas}, R. and {Masters}, K. and {Pacucci}, F. and {Paquereau}, L. and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, P.~G. and {Rhodes}, J.~D. and {Robertson}, B.~E. and {Simmons}, B. and {Smethurst}, R. and {Toft}, S. and {Yang}, L.},\n title = \"{COSMOS-Web: The emergence of the Hubble sequence}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics of Galaxies, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = dec,\n volume = {704},\n eid = {A94},\n pages = {A94},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202553782},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2502.03532},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...704A..94H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Long2024b,\n author = {{Long}, Arianna S. and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {McKinney}, Jed and {Zavala}, Jorge A. and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Cooper}, Olivia R. and {Lambrides}, Erini L. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Aravena}, Manuel and {Bethermin}, Matthieu and {Caputi}, Karina and {Champagne}, Jaclyn B. and {Clements}, D.~L. and {da Cunha}, Elisabete and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Gentile}, Fabrizio and {Hodge}, Jacqueline and {Man}, Allison W.~S. and {Manning}, Sinclaire M. and {Sanders}, David B. and {Talia}, Margherita and {Treister}, Ezequiel and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Brusa}, Marcella and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Jolly}, Jean-Baptiste and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Knudsen}, Kirsten and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Magdis}, Georgios and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Scoville}, Nick and {Sheth}, Kartik and {Smolcic}, Vernesa and {Spilker}, Justin and {Taniguchi}, Yoshiaki and {Toft}, Sune and {Urry}, C. Megan and {Yun}, Min},\n title = \"{The Extended Mapping Obscuration to Reionization with ALMA (Ex-MORA) Survey: 5{\\ensuremath{\\sigma}} Source Catalog and Redshift Distribution}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Submillimeter astronomy, Infrared galaxies, High-redshift galaxies, Redshift surveys, 1647, 790, 734, 1378, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2026,\n month = mar,\n volume = {999},\n number = {1},\n eid = {47},\n pages = {47},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ae2fda},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2408.14546},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ...999...47L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Casey2013,\n author = {{Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Chen}, Chian-Chou and {Cowie}, Lennox L. and {Barger}, Amy J. and {Capak}, Peter and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Koss}, Michael and {Lee}, Nicholas and {Le Floc'h}, Emeric and {Sanders}, David B. and {Williams}, Jonathan P.},\n title = \"{Characterization of SCUBA-2 450 $\\mu$m and 850 $\\mu$m selected galaxies in the COSMOS field}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: starbursts, infrared: galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = dec,\n volume = {436},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1919-1954},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt1673},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1302.2619},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436.1919C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{vanderVlugt2021,\n author = {{van der Vlugt}, D. and {Algera}, H.~S.~B. and {Hodge}, J.~A. and {Novak}, M. and {Radcliffe}, J.~F. and {Riechers}, D.~A. and {R{\\\"o}ttgering}, H. and {Smol{\\v{c}}i{\\'c}}, V. and {Walter}, F.},\n title = \"{An Ultradeep Multiband VLA Survey of the Faint Radio Sky (COSMOS-XS): Source Catalog and Number Counts}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Radio source counts, Radio source catalogs, Radio continuum emission, 1357, 1356, 1340, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = jan,\n volume = {907},\n number = {1},\n eid = {5},\n pages = {5},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/abcaa3},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2009.13528},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...907....5V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Smolvcic2017,\n author = {{Smol{\\v{c}}i{\\'c}}, V. and {Novak}, M. and {Bondi}, M. and {Ciliegi}, P. and {Mooley}, K.~P. and {Schinnerer}, E. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Navarrete}, F. and {Bourke}, S. and {Karim}, A. and {Vardoulaki}, E. and {Leslie}, S. and {Delhaize}, J. and {Carilli}, C.~L. and {Myers}, S.~T. and {Baran}, N. and {Delvecchio}, I. and {Miettinen}, O. and {Banfield}, J. and {Balokovi{\\'c}}, M. and {Bertoldi}, F. and {Capak}, P. and {Frail}, D.~A. and {Hallinan}, G. and {Hao}, H. and {Herrera Ruiz}, N. and {Horesh}, A. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Intema}, H. and {Jeli{\\'c}}, V. and {Kl{\\\"o}ckner}, H. -R. and {Krpan}, J. and {Kulkarni}, S.~R. and {McCracken}, H. and {Laigle}, C. and {Middleberg}, E. and {Murphy}, E.~J. and {Sargent}, M. and {Scoville}, N.~Z. and {Sheth}, K.},\n title = \"{The VLA-COSMOS 3 GHz Large Project: Continuum data and source catalog release}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {catalogs, cosmology: observations, radio continuum: galaxies, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = jun,\n volume = {602},\n eid = {A1},\n pages = {A1},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201628704},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1703.09713},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...602A...1S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Moneti&EuclidCollab2022,\n author = {{Euclid Collaboration: Moneti}, A. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Shuntov}, M. and {Kauffmann}, O.~B. and {Capak}, P. and {Davidzon}, I. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Scarlata}, C. and {Toft}, S. and {Weaver}, J. and {Chary}, R. and {Cuby}, J. and {Faisst}, A.~L. and {Masters}, D.~C. and {McPartland}, C. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Scaramella}, R. and {Stern}, D. and {Szapudi}, I. and {Teplitz}, H. and {Zalesky}, L. and {Amara}, A. and {Auricchio}, N. and {Bodendorf}, C. and {Bonino}, D. and {Branchini}, E. and {Brau-Nogue}, S. and {Brescia}, M. and {Brinchmann}, J. and {Capobianco}, V. and {Carbone}, C. and {Carretero}, J. and {Castander}, F.~J. and {Castellano}, M. and {Cavuoti}, S. and {Cimatti}, A. and {Cledassou}, R. and {Congedo}, G. and {Conselice}, C.~J. and {Conversi}, L. and {Copin}, Y. and {Corcione}, L. and {Costille}, A. and {Cropper}, M. and {Da Silva}, A. and {Degaudenzi}, H. and {Douspis}, M. and {Dubath}, F. and {Duncan}, C.~A.~J. and {Dupac}, X. and {Dusini}, S. and {Farrens}, S. and {Ferriol}, S. and {Fosalba}, P. and {Frailis}, M. and {Franceschi}, E. and {Fumana}, M. and {Garilli}, B. and {Gillis}, B. and {Giocoli}, C. and {Granett}, B.~R. and {Grazian}, A. and {Grupp}, F. and {Haugan}, S.~V.~H. and {Hoekstra}, H. and {Holmes}, W. and {Hormuth}, F. and {Hudelot}, P. and {Jahnke}, K. and {Kermiche}, S. and {Kiessling}, A. and {Kilbinger}, M. and {Kitching}, T. and {Kohley}, R. and {K{\\\"u}mmel}, M. and {Kunz}, M. and {Kurki-Suonio}, H. and {Ligori}, S. and {Lilje}, P.~B. and {Lloro}, I. and {Maiorano}, E. and {Mansutti}, O. and {Marggraf}, O. and {Markovic}, K. and {Marulli}, F. and {Massey}, R. and {Maurogordato}, S. and {Meneghetti}, M. and {Merlin}, E. and {Meylan}, G. and {Moresco}, M. and {Moscardini}, L. and {Munari}, E. and {Niemi}, S.~M. and {Padilla}, C. and {Paltani}, S. and {Pasian}, F. and {Pedersen}, K. and {Pires}, S. and {Poncet}, M. and {Popa}, L. and {Pozzetti}, L. and {Raison}, F. and {Rebolo}, R. and {Rhodes}, J. and {Rix}, H. and {Roncarelli}, M. and {Rossetti}, E. and {Saglia}, R. and {Schneider}, P. and {Secroun}, A. and {Seidel}, G. and {Serrano}, S. and {Sirignano}, C. and {Sirri}, G. and {Stanco}, L. and {Tallada-Cresp{\\'\\i}}, P. and {Taylor}, A.~N. and {Tereno}, I. and {Toledo-Moreo}, R. and {Torradeflot}, F. and {Wang}, Y. and {Welikala}, N. and {Weller}, J. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Zoubian}, J. and {Andreon}, S. and {Bardelli}, S. and {Camera}, S. and {Graci{\\'a}-Carpio}, J. and {Medinaceli}, E. and {Mei}, S. and {Polenta}, G. and {Romelli}, E. and {Sureau}, F. and {Tenti}, M. and {Vassallo}, T. and {Zacchei}, A. and {Zucca}, E. and {Baccigalupi}, C. and {Balaguera-Antol{\\'\\i}nez}, A. and {Bernardeau}, F. and {Biviano}, A. and {Bolzonella}, M. and {Bozzo}, E. and {Burigana}, C. and {Cabanac}, R. and {Cappi}, A. and {Carvalho}, C.~S. and {Casas}, S. and {Castignani}, G. and {Colodro-Conde}, C. and {Coupon}, J. and {Courtois}, H.~M. and {Di Ferdinando}, D. and {Farina}, M. and {Finelli}, F. and {Flose-Reimberg}, P. and {Fotopoulou}, S. and {Galeotta}, S. and {Ganga}, K. and {Garcia-Bellido}, J. and {Gaztanaga}, E. and {Gozaliasl}, G. and {Hook}, I. and {Joachimi}, B. and {Kansal}, V. and {Keihanen}, E. and {Kirkpatrick}, C.~C. and {Lindholm}, V. and {Mainetti}, G. and {Maino}, D. and {Maoli}, R. and {Martinelli}, M. and {Martinet}, N. and {Maturi}, M. and {Metcalf}, R.~B. and {Morgante}, G. and {Morisset}, N. and {Nucita}, A. and {Patrizii}, L. and {Potter}, D. and {Renzi}, A. and {Riccio}, G. and {S{\\'a}nchez}, A.~G. and {Sapone}, D. and {Schirmer}, M. and {Schultheis}, M. and {Scottez}, V. and {Sefusatti}, E. and {Teyssier}, R. and {Tubio}, O. and {Tutusaus}, I. and {Valiviita}, J. and {Viel}, M. and {Hildebrandt}, H.},\n title = \"{Euclid preparation. XVII. Cosmic Dawn Survey: Spitzer Space Telescope observations of the Euclid deep fields and calibration fields}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, large-scale structure of Universe, dark energy, dark matter, Galaxy: formation, surveys, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2022,\n month = feb,\n volume = {658},\n eid = {A126},\n pages = {A126},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202142361},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2110.13928},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...658A.126E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Casey2021,\n author = {{Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Zavala}, Jorge A. and {Manning}, Sinclaire M. and {Aravena}, Manuel and {B{\\'e}thermin}, Matthieu and {Caputi}, Karina I. and {Champagne}, Jaclyn B. and {Clements}, David L. and {Drew}, Patrick and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {Dekel}, Anton M. and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Lagos}, Claudia del P. and {Long}, Arianna S. and {Magdis}, Georgios E. and {Man}, Allison W.~S. and {Mitsuhashi}, Ikki and {Popping}, Gerg{\\\"o} and {Spilker}, Justin and {Staguhn}, Johannes and {Talia}, Margherita and {Toft}, Sune and {Treister}, Ezequiel and {Weaver}, John R. and {Yun}, Min},\n title = \"{Mapping Obscuration to Reionization with ALMA (MORA): 2 mm Efficiently Selects the Highest-redshift Obscured Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Millimeter astronomy, Submillimeter astronomy, Dust continuum emission, High-redshift galaxies, Active galaxies, Infrared galaxies, Starburst galaxies, 1061, 1647, 412, 734, 17, 790, 1570, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2021,\n month = dec,\n volume = {923},\n number = {2},\n eid = {215},\n pages = {215},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac2eb4},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2110.06930},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...923..215C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Scoville2007,\n author = {{Scoville}, N. and {Abraham}, R.~G. and {Aussel}, H. and {Barnes}, J.~E. and {Benson}, A. and {Blain}, A.~W. and {Calzetti}, D. and {Comastri}, A. and {Capak}, P. and {Carilli}, C. and {Carlstrom}, J.~E. and {Carollo}, C.~M. and {Colbert}, J. and {Daddi}, E. and {Ellis}, R.~S. and {Elvis}, M. and {Ewald}, S.~P. and {Fall}, M. and {Franceschini}, A. and {Giavalisco}, M. and {Green}, W. and {Griffiths}, R.~E. and {Guzzo}, L. and {Hasinger}, G. and {Impey}, C. and {Kneib}, J. -P. and {Koda}, J. and {Koekemoer}, A. and {Lefevre}, O. and {Lilly}, S. and {Liu}, C.~T. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Massey}, R. and {Mellier}, Y. and {Miyazaki}, S. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Mould}, J. and {Norman}, C. and {Refregier}, A. and {Renzini}, A. and {Rhodes}, J. and {Rich}, M. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Schiminovich}, D. and {Schinnerer}, E. and {Scodeggio}, M. and {Sheth}, K. and {Shopbell}, P.~L. and {Taniguchi}, Y. and {Tyson}, N.~D. and {Urry}, C.~M. and {Van Waerbeke}, L. and {Vettolani}, P. and {White}, S.~D.~M. and {Yan}, L.},\n title = \"{COSMOS: Hubble Space Telescope Observations}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Cosmology: Dark Matter, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Formation, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Surveys, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = sep,\n volume = {172},\n number = {1},\n pages = {38-45},\n doi = {10.1086/516580},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0612306},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..172...38S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Shi2024,\n author = {{Shi}, Ke and {Malavasi}, Nicola and {Toshikawa}, Jun and {Zheng}, Xianzhong},\n title = \"{Nature versus Nurture: Revisiting the Environmental Impact on Star Formation Activities of Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy environments, 2029, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = jan,\n volume = {961},\n number = {1},\n eid = {39},\n pages = {39},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad11d7},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2311.18427},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961...39S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Taamoli2024,\n author = {{Taamoli}, Sina and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Chartab}, Nima and {Darvish}, Behnam and {Weaver}, John R. and {Hemmati}, Shoubaneh and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Sattari}, Zahra and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Capak}, Peter L. and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {McCracken}, Henry J. and {Moneti}, Andrea and {Sanders}, David B. and {Scoville}, Nicholas and {Steinhardt}, Charles L. and {Toft}, Sune},\n title = \"{Large-scale Structures in COSMOS2020: Evolution of Star Formation Activity in Different Environments at 0.4 < z < 4}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Large-scale structure of the universe, Galaxy evolution, Galaxy environments, Galaxy quenching, 902, 594, 2029, 2040, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = may,\n volume = {966},\n number = {1},\n eid = {18},\n pages = {18},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad32c5},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2312.10222},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...966...18T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Khostovan2025,\n author = {{Khostovan}, Ali Ahmad and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Salvato}, Mara and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Algera}, Hiddo and {Antwi-Danso}, Jacqueline and {Battisti}, Andrew and {Brinch}, Malte and {Brusa}, Marcella and {Calabr{\\`o}}, Antonello and {Capak}, Peter L. and {Chartab}, Nima and {Cooper}, Olivia R. and {Cox}, Isa G. and {Darvish}, Behnam and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {George}, Matthew R. and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Harish}, Santosh and {Hasinger}, G{\\\"u}nther and {Hatamnia}, Hossein and {Iovino}, Angela and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Kashino}, Daichi and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Laishram}, Ronaldo and {Lee}, Khee-Gan and {Lertprasertpong}, Jitrapon and {Lilly}, Simon J. and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Masters}, Daniel C. and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Nagao}, Tohru and {Onodera}, Masato and {Peng}, Yingjie and {Sanders}, David B. and {Sanders}, Ryan L. and {Sattari}, Zahra and {Scoville}, Nick and {Shah}, Ekta A. and {Silverman}, John D. and {Suzuki}, Nao and {Taamoli}, Sina and {Tanaka}, Masayuki and {Tasca}, Lidia A.~M. and {Toft}, Sune and {Toni}, Greta and {Trakhtenbrot}, Benny and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {Vaccari}, Mattia and {Valentino}, Francesco and {Vanderhoof}, Brittany N. and {Weaver}, John R. and {Yun}, Min S. and {Zavala}, Jorge A.},\n title = \"{COSMOS Spectroscopic Redshift Compilation (First Data Release): 488,000 Redshifts Encompassing Two Decades of Spectroscopy}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy formation, Redshift surveys, Catalogs, Galaxy spectroscopy, 594, 595, 1378, 205, 2171, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2026,\n month = jan,\n volume = {282},\n number = {1},\n eid = {6},\n pages = {6},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4365/ae1cb9},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2503.00120},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJS..282....6K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Toni2025,\n author = {{Toni}, Greta and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Maturi}, Matteo and {Moscardini}, Lauro and {Finoguenov}, Alexis and {Castignani}, Gianluca and {Gentile}, Fabrizio and {Virolainen}, Kaija and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Allen}, Natalie and {Arango-Toro}, Rafael C. and {Babul}, Arif and {Brinch}, Malte and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Griffiths}, Richard E. and {Harish}, Santosh and {Hasinger}, G{\\\"u}nther and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Khostovan}, Ali Ahmad and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Korpi-Lagg}, Maarit and {Larson}, Rebecca L. and {Lertprasertpong}, Jitrapon and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Magdis}, Georgios and {Massey}, Richard and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {McKinney}, Jed and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Sargent}, Mark and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Tanaka}, Masayuki and {Taamoli}, Sina and {Tempel}, Elmo and {Toft}, Sune and {Vardoulaki}, Eleni and {Yang}, Lilan},\n title = \"{The COSMOS-Web deep galaxy group catalog up to z = 3.7}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: groups: general, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics of Galaxies, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = may,\n volume = {697},\n eid = {A197},\n pages = {A197},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202553759},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2501.09060},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...697A.197T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{MilvangJensen2013,\n author = {{Milvang-Jensen}, Bo and {Freudling}, Wolfram and {Zabl}, Johannes and {Fynbo}, Johan P.~U. and {M{\\o}ller}, Palle and {Nilsson}, Kim K. and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Hjorth}, Jens and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, Olivier and {Tasca}, Lidia and {Dunlop}, James S. and {Sobral}, David},\n title = \"{On-sky characterisation of the VISTA NB118 narrow-band filters at 1.19 {\\ensuremath{\\mu}}m}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {techniques: photometric, instrumentation: photometers, methods: observational, galaxies: photometry, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Galaxy Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = dec,\n volume = {560},\n eid = {A94},\n pages = {A94},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201321814},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1305.0262},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...560A..94M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Shuntov2025a,\n author = {{Shuntov}, M. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Toft}, S. and {Arango-Toro}, R.~C. and {Akins}, H.~B. and {Casey}, C.~M. and {Franco}, M. and {Harish}, S. and {Kartaltepe}, J.~S. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Paquereau}, L. and {Laigle}, C. and {Bethermin}, M. and {Dubois}, Y. and {Drakos}, N.~E. and {Faisst}, A. and {Gozaliasl}, G. and {Gillman}, S. and {Hayward}, C.~C. and {Hirschmann}, M. and {Huertas-Company}, M. and {Jespersen}, C.~K. and {Jin}, S. and {Kokorev}, V. and {Lambrides}, E. and {Le Borgne}, D. and {Liu}, D. and {Magdis}, G. and {Massey}, R. and {McPartland}, C.~J.~R. and {Mercier}, W. and {McCleary}, J.~E. and {McKinney}, J. and {Oesch}, P.~A. and {Renzini}, A. and {Rhodes}, J.~D. and {Rich}, R.~M. and {Robertson}, B.~E. and {Sanders}, D. and {Trebitsch}, M. and {Tresse}, L. and {Valentino}, F. and {Vijayan}, A.~P. and {Weaver}, J.~R. and {Weibel}, A. and {Wilkins}, S.~M. and {Yang}, L.},\n title = \"{COSMOS-Web: Stellar mass assembly in relation to dark matter halos across 0.2 < z < 12 of cosmic history}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = mar,\n volume = {695},\n eid = {A20},\n pages = {A20},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202452570},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2410.08290},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...695A..20S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{HuertasCompany2024,\n author = {{Huertas-Company}, M. and {Iyer}, K.~G. and {Angeloudi}, E. and {Bagley}, M.~B. and {Finkelstein}, S.~L. and {Kartaltepe}, J. and {McGrath}, E.~J. and {Sarmiento}, R. and {Vega-Ferrero}, J. and {Arrabal Haro}, P. and {Behroozi}, P. and {Buitrago}, F. and {Cheng}, Y. and {Costantin}, L. and {Dekel}, A. and {Dickinson}, M. and {Elbaz}, D. and {Grogin}, N.~A. and {Hathi}, N.~P. and {Holwerda}, B.~W. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Lucas}, R.~A. and {Papovich}, C. and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, P.~G. and {Pirzkal}, N. and {Seill{\\'e}}, L. -M. and {de la Vega}, A. and {Wuyts}, S. and {Yang}, G. and {Yung}, L.~Y.~A.},\n title = \"{Galaxy morphology from z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 6 through the lens of JWST}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {catalogs, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: statistics, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = may,\n volume = {685},\n eid = {A48},\n pages = {A48},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202346800},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2305.02478},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...685A..48H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Casey2024,\n author = {{Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Boylan-Kolchin}, Michael and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Allen}, Natalie and {Brinch}, Malte and {Cooper}, Olivia R. and {Ding}, Xuheng and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Gillman}, Steven and {Harish}, Santosh and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Long}, Arianna S. and {Magdis}, Georgios and {Maraston}, Claudia and {Martin}, Crystal L. and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {McKinney}, Jed and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Rich}, R. Michael and {Sanders}, David B. and {Silverman}, John D. and {Toft}, Sune and {Vijayan}, Aswin P. and {Weaver}, John R. and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Yang}, Lilan and {Zavala}, Jorge A.},\n title = \"{COSMOS-Web: Intrinsically Luminous z {\\ensuremath{\\gtrsim}} 10 Galaxy Candidates Test Early Stellar Mass Assembly}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Reionization, High-redshift galaxies, Redshift surveys, Lyman-break galaxies, 1383, 734, 1378, 979, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = apr,\n volume = {965},\n number = {1},\n eid = {98},\n pages = {98},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad2075},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2308.10932},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...965...98C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Koekemoer07,\n author = {{Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Aussel}, H. and {Calzetti}, D. and {Capak}, P. and {Giavalisco}, M. and {Kneib}, J. -P. and {Leauthaud}, A. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Massey}, R. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Rhodes}, J. and {Scoville}, N. and {Shopbell}, P.~L.},\n title = \"{The COSMOS Survey: Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys Observations and Data Processing}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Cosmology: Dark Matter, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Formation, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Surveys, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = sep,\n volume = {172},\n number = {1},\n pages = {196-202},\n doi = {10.1086/520086},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0703095},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..172..196K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{McCracken12,\n author = {{McCracken}, H.~J. and {Milvang-Jensen}, B. and {Dunlop}, J. and {Franx}, M. and {Fynbo}, J.~P.~U. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Holt}, J. and {Caputi}, K.~I. and {Goranova}, Y. and {Buitrago}, F. and {Emerson}, J.~P. and {Freudling}, W. and {Hudelot}, P. and {L{\\'o}pez-Sanjuan}, C. and {Magnard}, F. and {Mellier}, Y. and {M{\\o}ller}, P. and {Nilsson}, K.~K. and {Sutherland}, W. and {Tasca}, L. and {Zabl}, J.},\n title = \"{UltraVISTA: a new ultra-deep near-infrared survey in COSMOS}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {surveys, galaxies: general, galaxies: high-redshift, cosmology: observations, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = aug,\n volume = {544},\n eid = {A156},\n pages = {A156},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201219507},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1204.6586},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...544A.156M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Taniguchi07,\n author = {{Taniguchi}, Y. and {Scoville}, N. and {Murayama}, T. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Aussel}, H. and {Capak}, P. and {Ajiki}, M. and {Miyazaki}, S. and {Komiyama}, Y. and {Shioya}, Y. and {Nagao}, T. and {Sasaki}, S.~S. and {Koda}, J. and {Carilli}, C. and {Giavalisco}, M. and {Guzzo}, L. and {Hasinger}, G. and {Impey}, C. and {LeFevre}, O. and {Lilly}, S. and {Renzini}, A. and {Rich}, M. and {Schinnerer}, E. and {Shopbell}, P. and {Kaifu}, N. and {Karoji}, H. and {Arimoto}, N. and {Okamura}, S. and {Ohta}, K.},\n title = \"{The Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS): Subaru Observations of the HST Cosmos Field}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Interactions, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = sep,\n volume = {172},\n number = {1},\n pages = {9-28},\n doi = {10.1086/516596},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0612295},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..172....9T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Taniguchi15,\n author = {{Taniguchi}, Yoshiaki and {Kajisawa}, Masaru and {Kobayashi}, Masakazu A.~R. and {Shioya}, Yasuhiro and {Nagao}, Tohru and {Capak}, Peter L. and {Aussel}, Herve and {Ichikawa}, Akie and {Murayama}, Takashi and {Scoville}, Nick Z. and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Salvato}, Mara and {Sanders}, David B.~B. and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Miyazaki}, Satoshi and {Komiyama}, Yutaka and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, Olivier and {Tasca}, Lidia and {Lilly}, Simon and {Carollo}, Marcella and {Renzini}, Alvio and {Rich}, Michael and {Schinnerer}, Eva and {Kaifu}, Norio and {Karoji}, Hiroshi and {Arimoto}, Nobuo and {Okamura}, Sadanori and {Ohta}, Kouji and {Shimasaku}, Kazuhiro and {Hayashino}, Tomoki},\n title = \"{The Subaru COSMOS 20: Subaru optical imaging of the HST COSMOS field with 20 filters*}\",\n journal = {\\pasj},\n keywords = {methods: observational, surveys, techniques: photometric, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = dec,\n volume = {67},\n number = {6},\n eid = {104},\n pages = {104},\n doi = {10.1093/pasj/psv106},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1510.00550},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASJ...67..104T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Aihara2018a,\n author = {{Aihara}, Hiroaki and {Arimoto}, Nobuo and {Armstrong}, Robert and {Arnouts}, St{\\'e}phane and {Bahcall}, Neta A. and {Bickerton}, Steven and {Bosch}, James and {Bundy}, Kevin and {Capak}, Peter L. and {Chan}, James H.~H. and {Chiba}, Masashi and {Coupon}, Jean and {Egami}, Eiichi and {Enoki}, Motohiro and {Finet}, Francois and {Fujimori}, Hiroki and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Furusawa}, Hisanori and {Furusawa}, Junko and {Goto}, Tomotsugu and {Goulding}, Andy and {Greco}, Johnny P. and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Gunn}, James E. and {Hamana}, Takashi and {Harikane}, Yuichi and {Hashimoto}, Yasuhiro and {Hattori}, Takashi and {Hayashi}, Masao and {Hayashi}, Yusuke and {He{\\l}miniak}, Krzysztof G. and {Higuchi}, Ryo and {Hikage}, Chiaki and {Ho}, Paul T.~P. and {Hsieh}, Bau-Ching and {Huang}, Kuiyun and {Huang}, Song and {Ikeda}, Hiroyuki and {Imanishi}, Masatoshi and {Inoue}, Akio K. and {Iwasawa}, Kazushi and {Iwata}, Ikuru and {Jaelani}, Anton T. and {Jian}, Hung-Yu and {Kamata}, Yukiko and {Karoji}, Hiroshi and {Kashikawa}, Nobunari and {Katayama}, Nobuhiko and {Kawanomoto}, Satoshi and {Kayo}, Issha and {Koda}, Jin and {Koike}, Michitaro and {Kojima}, Takashi and {Komiyama}, Yutaka and {Konno}, Akira and {Koshida}, Shintaro and {Koyama}, Yusei and {Kusakabe}, Haruka and {Leauthaud}, Alexie and {Lee}, Chien-Hsiu and {Lin}, Lihwai and {Lin}, Yen-Ting and {Lupton}, Robert H. and {Mandelbaum}, Rachel and {Matsuoka}, Yoshiki and {Medezinski}, Elinor and {Mineo}, Sogo and {Miyama}, Shoken and {Miyatake}, Hironao and {Miyazaki}, Satoshi and {Momose}, Rieko and {More}, Anupreeta and {More}, Surhud and {Moritani}, Yuki and {Moriya}, Takashi J. and {Morokuma}, Tomoki and {Mukae}, Shiro and {Murata}, Ryoma and {Murayama}, Hitoshi and {Nagao}, Tohru and {Nakata}, Fumiaki and {Niida}, Mana and {Niikura}, Hiroko and {Nishizawa}, Atsushi J. and {Obuchi}, Yoshiyuki and {Oguri}, Masamune and {Oishi}, Yukie and {Okabe}, Nobuhiro and {Okamoto}, Sakurako and {Okura}, Yuki and {Ono}, Yoshiaki and {Onodera}, Masato and {Onoue}, Masafusa and {Osato}, Ken and {Ouchi}, Masami and {Price}, Paul A. and {Pyo}, Tae-Soo and {Sako}, Masao and {Sawicki}, Marcin and {Shibuya}, Takatoshi and {Shimasaku}, Kazuhiro and {Shimono}, Atsushi and {Shirasaki}, Masato and {Silverman}, John D. and {Simet}, Melanie and {Speagle}, Joshua and {Spergel}, David N. and {Strauss}, Michael A. and {Sugahara}, Yuma and {Sugiyama}, Naoshi and {Suto}, Yasushi and {Suyu}, Sherry H. and {Suzuki}, Nao and {Tait}, Philip J. and {Takada}, Masahiro and {Takata}, Tadafumi and {Tamura}, Naoyuki and {Tanaka}, Manobu M. and {Tanaka}, Masaomi and {Tanaka}, Masayuki and {Tanaka}, Yoko and {Terai}, Tsuyoshi and {Terashima}, Yuichi and {Toba}, Yoshiki and {Tominaga}, Nozomu and {Toshikawa}, Jun and {Turner}, Edwin L. and {Uchida}, Tomohisa and {Uchiyama}, Hisakazu and {Umetsu}, Keiichi and {Uraguchi}, Fumihiro and {Urata}, Yuji and {Usuda}, Tomonori and {Utsumi}, Yousuke and {Wang}, Shiang-Yu and {Wang}, Wei-Hao and {Wong}, Kenneth C. and {Yabe}, Kiyoto and {Yamada}, Yoshihiko and {Yamanoi}, Hitomi and {Yasuda}, Naoki and {Yeh}, Sherry and {Yonehara}, Atsunori and {Yuma}, Suraphong},\n title = \"{The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and survey design}\",\n journal = {\\pasj},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, galaxies: general, large-scale structure of universe, surveys, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = jan,\n volume = {70},\n eid = {S4},\n pages = {S4},\n doi = {10.1093/pasj/psx066},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1704.05858},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASJ...70S...4A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Aihara18b,\n author = {{Aihara}, Hiroaki and {Armstrong}, Robert and {Bickerton}, Steven and {Bosch}, James and {Coupon}, Jean and {Furusawa}, Hisanori and {Hayashi}, Yusuke and {Ikeda}, Hiroyuki and {Kamata}, Yukiko and {Karoji}, Hiroshi and {Kawanomoto}, Satoshi and {Koike}, Michitaro and {Komiyama}, Yutaka and {Lang}, Dustin and {Lupton}, Robert H. and {Mineo}, Sogo and {Miyatake}, Hironao and {Miyazaki}, Satoshi and {Morokuma}, Tomoki and {Obuchi}, Yoshiyuki and {Oishi}, Yukie and {Okura}, Yuki and {Price}, Paul A. and {Takata}, Tadafumi and {Tanaka}, Manobu M. and {Tanaka}, Masayuki and {Tanaka}, Yoko and {Uchida}, Tomohisa and {Uraguchi}, Fumihiro and {Utsumi}, Yousuke and {Wang}, Shiang-Yu and {Yamada}, Yoshihiko and {Yamanoi}, Hitomi and {Yasuda}, Naoki and {Arimoto}, Nobuo and {Chiba}, Masashi and {Finet}, Francois and {Fujimori}, Hiroki and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Furusawa}, Junko and {Goto}, Tomotsugu and {Goulding}, Andy and {Gunn}, James E. and {Harikane}, Yuichi and {Hattori}, Takashi and {Hayashi}, Masao and {He{\\l}miniak}, Krzysztof G. and {Higuchi}, Ryo and {Hikage}, Chiaki and {Ho}, Paul T.~P. and {Hsieh}, Bau-Ching and {Huang}, Kuiyun and {Huang}, Song and {Imanishi}, Masatoshi and {Iwata}, Ikuru and {Jaelani}, Anton T. and {Jian}, Hung-Yu and {Kashikawa}, Nobunari and {Katayama}, Nobuhiko and {Kojima}, Takashi and {Konno}, Akira and {Koshida}, Shintaro and {Kusakabe}, Haruka and {Leauthaud}, Alexie and {Lee}, Chien-Hsiu and {Lin}, Lihwai and {Lin}, Yen-Ting and {Mandelbaum}, Rachel and {Matsuoka}, Yoshiki and {Medezinski}, Elinor and {Miyama}, Shoken and {Momose}, Rieko and {More}, Anupreeta and {More}, Surhud and {Mukae}, Shiro and {Murata}, Ryoma and {Murayama}, Hitoshi and {Nagao}, Tohru and {Nakata}, Fumiaki and {Niida}, Mana and {Niikura}, Hiroko and {Nishizawa}, Atsushi J. and {Oguri}, Masamune and {Okabe}, Nobuhiro and {Ono}, Yoshiaki and {Onodera}, Masato and {Onoue}, Masafusa and {Ouchi}, Masami and {Pyo}, Tae-Soo and {Shibuya}, Takatoshi and {Shimasaku}, Kazuhiro and {Simet}, Melanie and {Speagle}, Joshua and {Spergel}, David N. and {Strauss}, Michael A. and {Sugahara}, Yuma and {Sugiyama}, Naoshi and {Suto}, Yasushi and {Suzuki}, Nao and {Tait}, Philip J. and {Takada}, Masahiro and {Terai}, Tsuyoshi and {Toba}, Yoshiki and {Turner}, Edwin L. and {Uchiyama}, Hisakazu and {Umetsu}, Keiichi and {Urata}, Yuji and {Usuda}, Tomonori and {Yeh}, Sherry and {Yuma}, Suraphong},\n title = \"{First data release of the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program}\",\n journal = {\\pasj},\n keywords = {astronomical databases, cosmology: observations, galaxies: general, surveys, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = jan,\n volume = {70},\n eid = {S8},\n pages = {S8},\n doi = {10.1093/pasj/psx081},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1702.08449},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASJ...70S...8A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Aihara22,\n author = {{Aihara}, Hiroaki and {AlSayyad}, Yusra and {Ando}, Makoto and {Armstrong}, Robert and {Bosch}, James and {Egami}, Eiichi and {Furusawa}, Hisanori and {Furusawa}, Junko and {Harasawa}, Sumiko and {Harikane}, Yuichi and {Hsieh}, Bau-Ching and {Ikeda}, Hiroyuki and {Ito}, Kei and {Iwata}, Ikuru and {Kodama}, Tadayuki and {Koike}, Michitaro and {Kokubo}, Mitsuru and {Komiyama}, Yutaka and {Li}, Xiangchong and {Liang}, Yongming and {Lin}, Yen-Ting and {Lupton}, Robert H. and {Lust}, Nate B. and {MacArthur}, Lauren A. and {Mawatari}, Ken and {Mineo}, Sogo and {Miyatake}, Hironao and {Miyazaki}, Satoshi and {More}, Surhud and {Morishima}, Takahiro and {Murayama}, Hitoshi and {Nakajima}, Kimihiko and {Nakata}, Fumiaki and {Nishizawa}, Atsushi J. and {Oguri}, Masamune and {Okabe}, Nobuhiro and {Okura}, Yuki and {Ono}, Yoshiaki and {Osato}, Ken and {Ouchi}, Masami and {Pan}, Yen-Chen and {Plazas Malag{\\'o}n}, Andr{\\'e}s A. and {Price}, Paul A. and {Reed}, Sophie L. and {Rykoff}, Eli S. and {Shibuya}, Takatoshi and {Simunovic}, Mirko and {Strauss}, Michael A. and {Sugimori}, Kanako and {Suto}, Yasushi and {Suzuki}, Nao and {Takada}, Masahiro and {Takagi}, Yuhei and {Takata}, Tadafumi and {Takita}, Satoshi and {Tanaka}, Masayuki and {Tang}, Shenli and {Taranu}, Dan S. and {Terai}, Tsuyoshi and {Toba}, Yoshiki and {Turner}, Edwin L. and {Uchiyama}, Hisakazu and {Vijarnwannaluk}, Bovornpratch and {Waters}, Christopher Z. and {Yamada}, Yoshihiko and {Yamamoto}, Naoaki and {Yamashita}, Takuji},\n title = \"{Third data release of the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program}\",\n journal = {\\pasj},\n keywords = {astronomical databases: miscellaneous, cosmology: observations, galaxies: general, surveys, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = apr,\n volume = {74},\n number = {2},\n pages = {247-272},\n doi = {10.1093/pasj/psab122},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2108.13045},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PASJ...74..247A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sawicki19,\n author = {{Sawicki}, Marcin and {Arnouts}, Stephane and {Huang}, Jiasheng and {Coupon}, Jean and {Golob}, Anneya and {Gwyn}, Stephen and {Foucaud}, Sebastien and {Moutard}, Thibaud and {Iwata}, Ikuru and {Liu}, Chengze and {Chen}, Lingjian and {Desprez}, Guillaume and {Harikane}, Yuichi and {Ono}, Yoshiaki and {Strauss}, Michael A. and {Tanaka}, Masayuki and {Thibert}, Nathalie and {Balogh}, Michael and {Bundy}, Kevin and {Chapman}, Scott and {Gunn}, James E. and {Hsieh}, Bau-Ching and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Jing}, Yipeng and {LeF{\\`e}vre}, Olivier and {Li}, Cheng and {Matsuda}, Yuichi and {Miyazaki}, Satoshi and {Nagao}, Tohru and {Nishizawa}, Atsushi J. and {Ouchi}, Masami and {Shimasaku}, Kazuhiro and {Silverman}, John and {de la Torre}, Sylvain and {Tresse}, Laurence and {Wang}, Wei-Hao and {Willott}, Chris J. and {Yamada}, Toru and {Yang}, Xiaohu and {Yee}, Howard K.~C.},\n title = \"{The CFHT large area U-band deep survey (CLAUDS)}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: statistics, dark matter, large-scale structure of universe, cosmology: observations, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2019,\n month = nov,\n volume = {489},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5202-5217},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz2522},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1909.05898},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.5202S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Akins2024,\n author = {{Akins}, Hollis B. and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Lambrides}, Erini and {Allen}, Natalie and {Andika}, Irham T. and {Brinch}, Malte and {Champagne}, Jaclyn B. and {Cooper}, Olivia and {Ding}, Xuheng and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Gentile}, Fabrizio and {Gillman}, Steven and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Harish}, Santosh and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Long}, Arianna S. and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {McKinney}, Jed and {Onoue}, Masafusa and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Renzini}, Alvio and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Silverman}, John D. and {Tanaka}, Takumi S. and {Toft}, Sune and {Trakhtenbrot}, Benny and {Valentino}, Francesco and {Zavala}, Jorge},\n title = \"{COSMOS-Web: The Overabundance and Physical Nature of ``Little Red Dots''{\\textemdash}Implications for Early Galaxy and SMBH Assembly}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active galactic nuclei, Quasars, High-redshift galaxies, Galaxies, 16, 1319, 734, 573, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = sep,\n volume = {991},\n number = {1},\n eid = {37},\n pages = {37},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ade984},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2406.10341},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...991...37A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n%------------------------------------------ History ------------------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{Penzias&Wilson1965,\n author = {{Penzias}, A.~A. and {Wilson}, R.~W.},\n title = \"{A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Microwave Background, Cosmic Background Radiation},\n year = 1965,\n month = jul,\n volume = {142},\n pages = {419-421},\n doi = {10.1086/148307},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1965ApJ...142..419P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@BOOK{Peebles1980,\n author = {{Peebles}, P.~J.~E.},\n title = \"{The large-scale structure of the universe}\",\n year = 1980,\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980lssu.book.....P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{White&Rees1978,\n author = {{White}, S.~D.~M. and {Rees}, M.~J.},\n title = \"{Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering.}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astronomical Models, Galactic Clusters, Galactic Evolution, Galactic Nuclei, Gravitational Effects, Halos, Critical Mass, Dark Matter, Dynamic Models, Interstellar Gas, Luminosity, Many Body Problem, Red Shift, Astrophysics, Formation:Galaxies},\n year = 1978,\n month = may,\n volume = {183},\n pages = {341-358},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/183.3.341},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978MNRAS.183..341W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Faber&Gallagher1979,\n author = {{Faber}, S.~M. and {Gallagher}, J.~S.},\n title = \"{Masses and mass-to-light ratios of galaxies.}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Galactic Clusters, Light Curve, Mass To Light Ratios, Spiral Galaxies, Disk Galaxies, Dynamic Response, Galactic Structure, Group Theory, Mass Distribution, Milky Way Galaxy, Missing Mass (Astrophysics), Stellar Luminosity, Stellar Mass Ejection, Astrophysics, Galaxies:Mass-to-Light Ratios, Galaxies:Masses, Galaxies:Missing Mass, Galaxy:Mass, Groups of Galaxies:Dynamics, Groups of Galaxies:Mass-to-Light Ratios},\n year = 1979,\n month = jan,\n volume = {17},\n pages = {135-187},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev.aa.17.090179.001031},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ARA&A..17..135F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ostriker1974,\n author = {{Ostriker}, J.~P. and {Peebles}, P.~J.~E. and {Yahil}, A.},\n title = \"{The Size and Mass of Galaxies, and the Mass of the Universe}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Cosmology, Size Determination, Spiral Galaxies, Density Distribution, Galactic Structure, Mass, Mass Ratios, Stellar Luminosity, Astrophysics},\n year = 1974,\n month = oct,\n volume = {193},\n pages = {L1},\n doi = {10.1086/181617},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...193L...1O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Einasto1974,\n author = {{Einasto}, J. and {Saar}, E. and {Kaasik}, A. and {Chernin}, A.~D.},\n title = \"{Missing mass around galaxies - Morphological evidence}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n keywords = {Coronas, Galactic Structure, Interstellar Gas, Mass Distribution, Missing Mass (Astrophysics), Andromeda Galaxy, Elliptical Galaxies, Galactic Evolution, Luminosity, Milky Way Galaxy, Spatial Distribution, Spiral Galaxies, Astrophysics, CORONAS, GALACTIC STRUCTURE, INTERSTELLAR GAS, MASS DISTRIBUTION, MISSING MASS (ASTROPHYSICS), ANDROMEDA GALAXY, ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES, GALACTIC EVOLUTION, LUMINOSITY, MILKY WAY GALAXY, SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION, SPIRAL GALAXIES},\n year = 1974,\n month = nov,\n volume = {252},\n pages = {111-113},\n doi = {10.1038/252111a0},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974Natur.252..111E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Zwicky1933,\n author = {{Zwicky}, F.},\n title = \"{Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln}\",\n journal = {Helvetica Physica Acta},\n year = 1933,\n month = jan,\n volume = {6},\n pages = {110-127},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1933AcHPh...6..110Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Zwicky1937,\n author = {{Zwicky}, F.},\n title = \"{On the Masses of Nebulae and of Clusters of Nebulae}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1937,\n month = oct,\n volume = {86},\n pages = {217},\n doi = {10.1086/143864},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1937ApJ....86..217Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Rubin&Ford1970,\n author = {{Rubin}, Vera C. and {Ford}, Jr., W. Kent},\n title = \"{Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1970,\n month = feb,\n volume = {159},\n pages = {379},\n doi = {10.1086/150317},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1970ApJ...159..379R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hubble1929,\n author = {{Hubble}, Edwin},\n title = \"{A Relation between Distance and Radial Velocity among Extra-Galactic Nebulae}\",\n journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Science},\n year = 1929,\n month = mar,\n volume = {15},\n number = {3},\n pages = {168-173},\n doi = {10.1073/pnas.15.3.168},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1929PNAS...15..168H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hubble1926,\n author = {{Hubble}, E.~P.},\n title = \"{Extragalactic nebulae.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1926,\n month = dec,\n volume = {64},\n pages = {321-369},\n doi = {10.1086/143018},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1926ApJ....64..321H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bardeen1986,\n author = {{Bardeen}, J.~M. and {Bond}, J.~R. and {Kaiser}, N. and {Szalay}, A.~S.},\n title = \"{The Statistics of Peaks of Gaussian Random Fields}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology, Density Distribution, Galactic Clusters, Galactic Evolution, Random Processes, Statistical Analysis, Density (Number/Volume), Mass Distribution, Mass To Light Ratios, Maxima, Missing Mass (Astrophysics), Probability Distribution Functions, Red Shift, Statistical Correlation, Velocity Distribution, Astrophysics, EARLY UNIVERSE, GALAXIES: CLUSTERING, GALAXIES: FORMATION},\n year = 1986,\n month = may,\n volume = {304},\n pages = {15},\n doi = {10.1086/164143},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...304...15B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mo&White1996,\n author = {{Mo}, H.~J. and {White}, S.~D.~M.},\n title = \"{An analytic model for the spatial clustering of dark matter haloes}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {METHODS: ANALYTICAL, GALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERAL, GALAXIES: FORMATION, COSMOLOGY: THEORY, DARK MATTER, Astrophysics},\n year = 1996,\n month = sep,\n volume = {282},\n number = {2},\n pages = {347-361},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/282.2.347},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9512127},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.282..347M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Klypin1996,\n author = {{Klypin}, Anatoly and {Primack}, Joel and {Holtzman}, Jon},\n title = \"{Small-Scale Power Spectrum and Correlations in Lambda + Cold Dark Matter Models}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {COSMOLOGY: THEORY, COSMOLOGY: DARK MATTER, COSMOLOGY: LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSE, GALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERAL},\n year = 1996,\n month = jul,\n volume = {466},\n pages = {13},\n doi = {10.1086/177489},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...466...13K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Baugh1996a,\n author = {{Baugh}, C.~M.},\n title = \"{The real-space correlation function measured from the APM Galaxy Survey}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {SURVEYS, GALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERAL, DARK MATTER, LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSE, Astrophysics},\n year = 1996,\n month = may,\n volume = {280},\n number = {1},\n pages = {267-275},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/280.1.267},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9512011},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.280..267B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Baugh1996b,\n author = {{Baugh}, C.~M. and {Gardner}, J.~P. and {Frenk}, C.~S. and {Sharples}, R.~M.},\n title = \"{A wide-field K-band survey - II. Galaxy clustering}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {surveys - galaxies: clusters: general - cosmology: observations - largescale structure of Universe - infrared: galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 1996,\n month = nov,\n volume = {283},\n pages = {L15-L19},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/283.1.L15},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9608142},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996MNRAS.283L..15B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Colin1999,\n author = {{Col{\\'\\i}n}, Pedro and {Klypin}, Anatoly A. and {Kravtsov}, Andrey V. and {Khokhlov}, Alexei M.},\n title = \"{Evolution of Bias in Different Cosmological Models}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {COSMOLOGY: THEORY, GALAXIES: HALOS, COSMOLOGY: LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSE, METHODS: N-BODY SIMULATIONS, Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Halos, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, methods: n-body simulations, Astrophysics},\n year = 1999,\n month = sep,\n volume = {523},\n number = {1},\n pages = {32-53},\n doi = {10.1086/307710},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9809202},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...523...32C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kravtsov&Klypin1999,\n author = {{Kravtsov}, Andrey V. and {Klypin}, Anatoly A.},\n title = \"{The Origin and Evolution of Halo Bias in Linear and Nonlinear Regimes}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {COSMOLOGY: THEORY, GALAXIES: HALOS, COSMOLOGY: LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSE, METHODS: NUMERICAL, Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Halos, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Methods: Numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 1999,\n month = aug,\n volume = {520},\n number = {2},\n pages = {437-453},\n doi = {10.1086/307495},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9812311},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...520..437K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{York2000,\n author = {{York}, Donald G. and {Adelman}, J. and {Anderson}, Jr., John E. and {Anderson}, Scott F. and {Annis}, James and {Bahcall}, Neta A. and {Bakken}, J.~A. and {Barkhouser}, Robert and {Bastian}, Steven and {Berman}, Eileen and {Boroski}, William N. and {Bracker}, Steve and {Briegel}, Charlie and {Briggs}, John W. and {Brinkmann}, J. and {Brunner}, Robert and {Burles}, Scott and {Carey}, Larry and {Carr}, Michael A. and {Castander}, Francisco J. and {Chen}, Bing and {Colestock}, Patrick L. and {Connolly}, A.~J. and {Crocker}, J.~H. and {Csabai}, Istv{\\'a}n and {Czarapata}, Paul C. and {Davis}, John Eric and {Doi}, Mamoru and {Dombeck}, Tom and {Eisenstein}, Daniel and {Ellman}, Nancy and {Elms}, Brian R. and {Evans}, Michael L. and {Fan}, Xiaohui and {Federwitz}, Glenn R. and {Fiscelli}, Larry and {Friedman}, Scott and {Frieman}, Joshua A. and {Fukugita}, Masataka and {Gillespie}, Bruce and {Gunn}, James E. and {Gurbani}, Vijay K. and {de Haas}, Ernst and {Haldeman}, Merle and {Harris}, Frederick H. and {Hayes}, J. and {Heckman}, Timothy M. and {Hennessy}, G.~S. and {Hindsley}, Robert B. and {Holm}, Scott and {Holmgren}, Donald J. and {Huang}, Chi-hao and {Hull}, Charles and {Husby}, Don and {Ichikawa}, Shin-Ichi and {Ichikawa}, Takashi and {Ivezi{\\'c}}, {\\v{Z}}eljko and {Kent}, Stephen and {Kim}, Rita S.~J. and {Kinney}, E. and {Klaene}, Mark and {Kleinman}, A.~N. and {Kleinman}, S. and {Knapp}, G.~R. and {Korienek}, John and {Kron}, Richard G. and {Kunszt}, Peter Z. and {Lamb}, D.~Q. and {Lee}, B. and {Leger}, R. French and {Limmongkol}, Siriluk and {Lindenmeyer}, Carl and {Long}, Daniel C. and {Loomis}, Craig and {Loveday}, Jon and {Lucinio}, Rich and {Lupton}, Robert H. and {MacKinnon}, Bryan and {Mannery}, Edward J. and {Mantsch}, P.~M. and {Margon}, Bruce and {McGehee}, Peregrine and {McKay}, Timothy A. and {Meiksin}, Avery and {Merelli}, Aronne and {Monet}, David G. and {Munn}, Jeffrey A. and {Narayanan}, Vijay K. and {Nash}, Thomas and {Neilsen}, Eric and {Neswold}, Rich and {Newberg}, Heidi Jo and {Nichol}, R.~C. and {Nicinski}, Tom and {Nonino}, Mario and {Okada}, Norio and {Okamura}, Sadanori and {Ostriker}, Jeremiah P. and {Owen}, Russell and {Pauls}, A. George and {Peoples}, John and {Peterson}, R.~L. and {Petravick}, Donald and {Pier}, Jeffrey R. and {Pope}, Adrian and {Pordes}, Ruth and {Prosapio}, Angela and {Rechenmacher}, Ron and {Quinn}, Thomas R. and {Richards}, Gordon T. and {Richmond}, Michael W. and {Rivetta}, Claudio H. and {Rockosi}, Constance M. and {Ruthmansdorfer}, Kurt and {Sandford}, Dale and {Schlegel}, David J. and {Schneider}, Donald P. and {Sekiguchi}, Maki and {Sergey}, Gary and {Shimasaku}, Kazuhiro and {Siegmund}, Walter A. and {Smee}, Stephen and {Smith}, J. Allyn and {Snedden}, S. and {Stone}, R. and {Stoughton}, Chris and {Strauss}, Michael A. and {Stubbs}, Christopher and {SubbaRao}, Mark and {Szalay}, Alexander S. and {Szapudi}, Istvan and {Szokoly}, Gyula P. and {Thakar}, Anirudda R. and {Tremonti}, Christy and {Tucker}, Douglas L. and {Uomoto}, Alan and {Vanden Berk}, Dan and {Vogeley}, Michael S. and {Waddell}, Patrick and {Wang}, Shu-i. and {Watanabe}, Masaru and {Weinberg}, David H. and {Yanny}, Brian and {Yasuda}, Naoki and {SDSS Collaboration}},\n title = \"{The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Instrumentation: Miscellaneous, Astrophysics},\n year = 2000,\n month = sep,\n volume = {120},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1579-1587},\n doi = {10.1086/301513},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0006396},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....120.1579Y},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n%---------------------------------- Clustering measurements ----------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{Hauser&Peebles1973,\n author = {{Hauser}, M.~G. and {Peebles}, P.~J.~E.},\n title = \"{Statistical Analysis of Catalogs of Extragalactic Objects. II. the Abell Catalog of Rich Clusters}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1973,\n month = nov,\n volume = {185},\n pages = {757-786},\n doi = {10.1086/152453},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973ApJ...185..757H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Weinberg2004,\n author = {{Weinberg}, David H. and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel and {Katz}, Neal and {Hernquist}, Lars},\n title = \"{Galaxy Clustering and Galaxy Bias in a {\\ensuremath{\\Lambda}}CDM Universe}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Formation, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Methods: Numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = jan,\n volume = {601},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1-21},\n doi = {10.1086/380481},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0212356},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...601....1W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{MartinezManso2015,\n author = {{Martinez-Manso}, Jesus and {Gonzalez}, Anthony H. and {Ashby}, Matthew L.~N. and {Stanford}, S.~A. and {Brodwin}, Mark and {Holder}, Gilbert P. and {Stern}, Daniel},\n title = \"{The Spitzer South Pole Telescope Deep-Field Survey: linking galaxies and haloes at z = 1.5}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: high-redshift, cosmology: observations, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = jan,\n volume = {446},\n number = {1},\n pages = {169-194},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu1998},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1404.2930},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.446..169M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Totsuji&Kihara1969,\n author = {{Totsuji}, H. and {Kihara}, T.},\n title = \"{The Correlation Function for the Distribution of Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\pasj},\n year = 1969,\n month = jan,\n volume = {21},\n pages = {221},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969PASJ...21..221T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Durkalec2018,\n author = {{Durkalec}, A. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Pollo}, A. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Lemaux}, B.~C. and {Garilli}, B. and {Bardelli}, S. and {Hathi}, N. and {Koekemoer}, A. and {Pforr}, J. and {Zucca}, E.},\n title = \"{The VIMOS Ultra Deep Survey. Luminosity and stellar mass dependence of galaxy clustering at z 3}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {large-scale structure of Universe, galaxies: statistics, galaxies: structure, dark matter, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = apr,\n volume = {612},\n eid = {A42},\n pages = {A42},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201730734},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1703.02049},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...612A..42D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Li2006,\n author = {{Li}, Cheng and {Kauffmann}, Guinevere and {Jing}, Y.~P. and {White}, Simon D.~M. and {B{\\\"o}rner}, Gerhard and {Cheng}, F.~Z.},\n title = \"{The dependence of clustering on galaxy properties}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: distances and redshifts, cosmology: theory, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = may,\n volume = {368},\n number = {1},\n pages = {21-36},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10066.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0509873},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.368...21L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Nordberg2002,\n author = {{Norberg}, Peder and {Baugh}, Carlton M. and {Hawkins}, Ed and {Maddox}, Steve and {Madgwick}, Darren and {Lahav}, Ofer and {Cole}, Shaun and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {Baldry}, Ivan and {Bland-Hawthorn}, Joss and {Bridges}, Terry and {Cannon}, Russell and {Colless}, Matthew and {Collins}, Chris and {Couch}, Warrick and {Dalton}, Gavin and {De Propris}, Roberto and {Driver}, Simon P. and {Efstathiou}, George and {Ellis}, Richard S. and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Jackson}, Carole and {Lewis}, Ian and {Lumsden}, Stuart and {Peacock}, John A. and {Peterson}, Bruce A. and {Sutherland}, Will and {Taylor}, Keith},\n title = \"{The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: the dependence of galaxy clustering on luminosity and spectral type}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, methods: statistical, galaxies: formation, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2002,\n month = jun,\n volume = {332},\n number = {4},\n pages = {827-838},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05348.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0112043},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.332..827N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{McCracken2008,\n author = {{McCracken}, H.~J. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Mellier}, Y. and {Bertin}, E. and {Guzzo}, L. and {Arnouts}, S. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Zamorani}, G.},\n title = \"{Clustering properties of a type-selected volume-limited sample of galaxies in the CFHTLS}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {cosmology: large-scale structure of Universe, galaxies: photometry, cosmology: observations, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = feb,\n volume = {479},\n number = {2},\n pages = {321-334},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20078636},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0711.4204},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...479..321M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Magliocchetti2023,\n author = {{Magliocchetti}, M. and {Santini}, P. and {Merlin}, E. and {Pentericci}, L.},\n title = \"{The clustering properties of high-redshift passive galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: statistics, large-scale structure of the Universe, cosmology: observations, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = nov,\n volume = {526},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L8-L12},\n doi = {10.1093/mnrasl/slad109},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2307.16067},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526L...8M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Shuntov2025b,\n author = {{Shuntov}, Marko and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Toft}, Sune and {Meyer}, Romain A. and {Covelo-Paz}, Alba and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Bouwens}, Rychard and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Gelli}, Viola and {Giovinazzo}, Emma and {Herard-Demanche}, Thomas and {Illingworth}, Garth D. and {Mason}, Charlotte and {Naidu}, Rohan P. and {Weibel}, Andrea and {Xiao}, Mengyuan},\n title = \"{Constraints on the early Universe star formation efficiency from galaxy clustering and halo modeling of H{\\ensuremath{\\alpha}} and [O III] emitters}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = jul,\n volume = {699},\n eid = {A231},\n pages = {A231},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202554618},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2503.14280},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...699A.231S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Qiu2018,\n author = {{Qiu}, Yisheng and {Wyithe}, J. Stuart B. and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Mutch}, Simon J. and {Qin}, Yuxiang and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Bouwens}, Rychard J. and {Stefanon}, Mauro and {Illingworth}, Garth D.},\n title = \"{Dependence of galaxy clustering on UV luminosity and stellar mass at z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 4-7}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = dec,\n volume = {481},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4885-4894},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty2633},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1809.10161},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.4885Q},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wake2011,\n author = {{Wake}, David A. and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {van Dokkum}, Pieter G. and {Franx}, Marijn and {Quadri}, Ryan and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Kriek}, Mariska and {Lundgren}, Britt F. and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Muzzin}, Adam},\n title = \"{Galaxy Clustering in the NEWFIRM Medium Band Survey: The Relationship Between Stellar Mass and Dark Matter Halo Mass at 1 < z < 2}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: halos, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = feb,\n volume = {728},\n number = {1},\n eid = {46},\n pages = {46},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/728/1/46},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1012.1317},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...728...46W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Coil2008,\n author = {{Coil}, Alison L. and {Newman}, Jeffrey A. and {Croton}, Darren and {Cooper}, Michael C. and {Davis}, Marc and {Faber}, S.~M. and {Gerke}, Brian F. and {Koo}, David C. and {Padmanabhan}, Nikhil and {Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Weiner}, Benjamin J.},\n title = \"{The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Color and Luminosity Dependence of Galaxy Clustering at z \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde 1}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = jan,\n volume = {672},\n number = {1},\n pages = {153-176},\n doi = {10.1086/523639},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0708.0004},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...672..153C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Zehavi2011,\n author = {{Zehavi}, Idit and {Zheng}, Zheng and {Weinberg}, David H. and {Blanton}, Michael R. and {Bahcall}, Neta A. and {Berlind}, Andreas A. and {Brinkmann}, Jon and {Frieman}, Joshua A. and {Gunn}, James E. and {Lupton}, Robert H. and {Nichol}, Robert C. and {Percival}, Will J. and {Schneider}, Donald P. and {Skibba}, Ramin A. and {Strauss}, Michael A. and {Tegmark}, Max and {York}, Donald G.},\n title = \"{Galaxy Clustering in the Completed SDSS Redshift Survey: The Dependence on Color and Luminosity}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, cosmology: theory, galaxies: distances and redshifts, galaxies: halos, galaxies: statistics, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = jul,\n volume = {736},\n number = {1},\n eid = {59},\n pages = {59},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/59},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1005.2413},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...736...59Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Peebles&Groth1975,\n author = {{Peebles}, P.~J.~E. and {Groth}, E.~J.},\n title = \"{Statistical analysis of catalogs of extragalactic objects. V. Three-point correlation function for the galaxy distribution in the Zwicky catalog.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Astronomical Catalogs, Astronomical Models, Galactic Clusters, Statistical Analysis, Correlation, Dynamic Stability, Extragalactic Radio Sources, Gravitational Effects, Least Squares Method, Astronomy},\n year = 1975,\n month = feb,\n volume = {196},\n pages = {1-11},\n doi = {10.1086/153390},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1975ApJ...196....1P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Zehavi2004,\n author = {{Zehavi}, Idit and {Weinberg}, David H. and {Zheng}, Zheng and {Berlind}, Andreas A. and {Frieman}, Joshua A. and {Scoccimarro}, Rom{\\'a}n and {Sheth}, Ravi K. and {Blanton}, Michael R. and {Tegmark}, Max and {Mo}, Houjun J. and {Bahcall}, Neta A. and {Brinkmann}, Jon and {Burles}, Scott and {Csabai}, Istv{\\'a}n and {Fukugita}, Masataka and {Gunn}, James E. and {Lamb}, Don Q. and {Loveday}, Jon and {Lupton}, Robert H. and {Meiksin}, Avery and {Munn}, Jeffrey A. and {Nichol}, Robert C. and {Schlegel}, David and {Schneider}, Donald P. and {SubbaRao}, Mark and {Szalay}, Alexander S. and {Uomoto}, Alan and {York}, Donald G. and {SDSS Collaboration}},\n title = \"{On Departures from a Power Law in the Galaxy Correlation Function}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Distances and Redshifts, Galaxies: Fundamental Parameters, Galaxies: Statistics, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = jun,\n volume = {608},\n number = {1},\n pages = {16-24},\n doi = {10.1086/386535},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0301280},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...608...16Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Xu2023,\n author = {{Xu}, Haojie and {Zhang}, Pengjie and {Peng}, Hui and {Yu}, Yu and {Zhang}, Le and {Yao}, Ji and {Qin}, Jian and {Sun}, Zeyang and {He}, Min and {Yang}, Xiaohu},\n title = \"{Using angular two-point correlations to self-calibrate the photometric redshift distributions of DECaLS DR9}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: distances and redshifts, galaxies: photometry, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = mar,\n volume = {520},\n number = {1},\n pages = {161-179},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad136},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2209.03967},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520..161X},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hildebrandt2009,\n author = {{Hildebrandt}, H. and {van Waerbeke}, L. and {Erben}, T.},\n title = \"{CARS: The CFHTLS-Archive-Research Survey. III. First detection of cosmic magnification in samples of normal high-z galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: observations, dark matter, cosmological parameters, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = nov,\n volume = {507},\n number = {2},\n pages = {683-691},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/200912655},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0906.1580},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...507..683H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lee2006,\n author = {{Lee}, Kyoung-Soo and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Gnedin}, Oleg Y. and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Ouchi}, Masami},\n title = \"{The Large-Scale and Small-Scale Clustering of Lyman Break Galaxies at 3.5<=z<=5.5 from the GOODS Survey}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Galaxies: Distances and Redshifts, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Formation, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = may,\n volume = {642},\n number = {1},\n pages = {63-80},\n doi = {10.1086/500387},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0508090},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642...63L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ouchi2004,\n author = {{Ouchi}, Masami and {Shimasaku}, Kazuhiro and {Okamura}, Sadanori and {Furusawa}, Hisanori and {Kashikawa}, Nobunari and {Ota}, Kazuaki and {Doi}, Mamoru and {Hamabe}, Masaru and {Kimura}, Masahiko and {Komiyama}, Yutaka and {Miyazaki}, Masayuki and {Miyazaki}, Satoshi and {Nakata}, Fumiaki and {Sekiguchi}, Maki and {Yagi}, Masafumi and {Yasuda}, Naoki},\n title = \"{Subaru Deep Survey. VI. A Census of Lyman Break Galaxies at z\\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde=4 and 5 in the Subaru Deep Fields: Clustering Properties}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Cosmology: Early Universe, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: High-Redshift, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = aug,\n volume = {611},\n number = {2},\n pages = {685-702},\n doi = {10.1086/422208},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0309657},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...611..685O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Overzier2006,\n author = {{Overzier}, Roderik A. and {Bouwens}, Rychard J. and {Illingworth}, Garth D. and {Franx}, Marijn},\n title = \"{Clustering of i$_{775}$ Dropout Galaxies at z \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde 6 in GOODS and the UDF}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Cosmology: Early Universe, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = sep,\n volume = {648},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L5-L8},\n doi = {10.1086/507678},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0607398},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...648L...5O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Zaidi2024,\n author = {{Zaidi}, Kumail and {Wake}, David A. and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Iyer}, Kartheik and {Muzzin}, Adam and {Papovich}, Casey and {Antwi-Danso}, Jacqueline and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo},\n title = \"{The FENIKS Survey: Stellar─Halo Mass Relationship of Central and Satellite Galaxies in UDS and COSMOS at 0.2 < z < 4.5}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy dark matter halos, Stellar mass functions, Clustering, 594, 1880, 1612, 1908, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2026,\n month = jun,\n volume = {1004},\n number = {1},\n eid = {96},\n pages = {96},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ae6b7d},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2411.04256},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ..1004...96Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ji18,\n author = {{Ji}, Zhiyuan and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Faber}, Sandra M. and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Guo}, Yicheng and {Liu}, Teng and {Lee}, Bomee},\n title = \"{Evidence of Environmental Quenching at Redshift z {\\ensuremath{\\approx}} 2}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = aug,\n volume = {862},\n number = {2},\n eid = {135},\n pages = {135},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aacc2c},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1806.04142},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...862..135J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Iovino16_cluster07,\n author = {{Iovino}, A. and {Petropoulou}, V. and {Scodeggio}, M. and {Bolzonella}, M. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Bardelli}, S. and {Cucciati}, O. and {Pozzetti}, L. and {Tasca}, L. and {Vergani}, D. and {Zucca}, E. and {Finoguenov}, A. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Tanaka}, M. and {Salvato}, M. and {Kova{\\v{c}}}, K. and {Cassata}, P.},\n title = \"{A high definition view of the COSMOS Wall at z \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde 0.73}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: groups: general, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = aug,\n volume = {592},\n eid = {A78},\n pages = {A78},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201527673},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1606.06185},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...592A..78I},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{McCracken15,\n author = {{McCracken}, H.~J. and {Wolk}, M. and {Colombi}, S. and {Kilbinger}, M. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Peirani}, S. and {Coupon}, J. and {Dunlop}, J. and {Milvang-Jensen}, B. and {Caputi}, K. and {Aussel}, H. and {B{\\'e}thermin}, M. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O.},\n title = \"{Probing the galaxy-halo connection in UltraVISTA to z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 2}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = may,\n volume = {449},\n number = {1},\n pages = {901-916},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv305},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1411.4983},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449..901M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dalmasso2024a,\n author = {{Dalmasso}, Nicol{\\`o} and {Trenti}, Michele and {Leethochawalit}, Nicha},\n title = \"{Galaxy clustering measurements out to redshift z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 8 from Hubble Legacy Fields}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: general, galaxies: high-redshift, cosmology: observations, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = feb,\n volume = {528},\n number = {1},\n pages = {898-908},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad3901},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2312.12329},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528..898D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dalmasso24,\n author = {{Dalmasso}, Nicol{\\`o} and {Leethochawalit}, Nicha and {Trenti}, Michele and {Boyett}, Kristan},\n title = \"{Galaxy clustering at cosmic dawn from JWST/NIRCam observations to redshift z 11}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = sep,\n volume = {533},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2391-2398},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae2006},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2402.18052},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533.2391D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{BaroneNugent14,\n author = {{Barone-Nugent}, R.~L. and {Trenti}, M. and {Wyithe}, J.~S.~B. and {Bouwens}, R.~J. and {Oesch}, P.~A. and {Illingworth}, G.~D. and {Carollo}, C.~M. and {Su}, J. and {Stiavelli}, M. and {Labbe}, I. and {van Dokkum}, P.~G.},\n title = \"{Measurement of Galaxy Clustering at z \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde 7.2 and the Evolution of Galaxy Bias from 3.8 < z < 8 in the XDF, GOODS-S, and GOODS-N}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, galaxies: general, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = sep,\n volume = {793},\n number = {1},\n eid = {17},\n pages = {17},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/793/1/17},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1407.7316},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...793...17B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Cowley18,\n author = {{Cowley}, William I. and {Caputi}, Karina I. and {Deshmukh}, Smaran and {Ashby}, Matthew L.~N. and {Fazio}, Giovanni G. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, Olivier and {Fynbo}, Johan P.~U. and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {McCracken}, Henry J. and {Milvang-Jensen}, Bo and {Somerville}, Rachel S.},\n title = \"{The Galaxy-Halo Connection for 1.5\\textbackslashlesssim z\\textbackslashlesssim 5 as Revealed by the Spitzer Matching Survey of the UltraVISTA Ultra-deep Stripes}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, large-scale structure of universe, methods: statistical, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = jan,\n volume = {853},\n number = {1},\n eid = {69},\n pages = {69},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aaa41d},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1712.03844},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...853...69C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ashby2018,\n author = {{Ashby}, M.~L.~N. and {Caputi}, Karina I. and {Cowley}, Will and {Deshmukh}, Smaran and {Dunlop}, James S. and {Milvang-Jensen}, Bo and {Fynbo}, Johan P.~U. and {Muzzin}, Adam and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, Olivier and {Huang}, Jia-Sheng and {Zhang}, J.},\n title = \"{Spitzer Matching Survey of the UltraVISTA Ultra-deep Stripes (SMUVS): Full-mission IRAC Mosaics and Catalogs}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {catalogs, infrared: galaxies, surveys, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = aug,\n volume = {237},\n number = {2},\n eid = {39},\n pages = {39},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4365/aad4fb},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1801.02660},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..237...39A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Harikane18,\n author = {{Harikane}, Yuichi and {Ouchi}, Masami and {Ono}, Yoshiaki and {Saito}, Shun and {Behroozi}, Peter and {More}, Surhud and {Shimasaku}, Kazuhiro and {Toshikawa}, Jun and {Lin}, Yen-Ting and {Akiyama}, Masayuki and {Coupon}, Jean and {Komiyama}, Yutaka and {Konno}, Akira and {Lin}, Sheng-Chieh and {Miyazaki}, Satoshi and {Nishizawa}, Atsushi J. and {Shibuya}, Takatoshi and {Silverman}, John},\n title = \"{GOLDRUSH. II. Clustering of galaxies at z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 4-6 revealed with the half-million dropouts over the 100 deg$^{2}$ area corresponding to 1 Gpc$^{3}$}\",\n journal = {\\pasj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = jan,\n volume = {70},\n eid = {S11},\n pages = {S11},\n doi = {10.1093/pasj/psx097},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1704.06535},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASJ...70S..11H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Coupon15,\n author = {{Coupon}, J. and {Arnouts}, S. and {van Waerbeke}, L. and {Moutard}, T. and {Ilbert}, O. and {van Uitert}, E. and {Erben}, T. and {Garilli}, B. and {Guzzo}, L. and {Heymans}, C. and {Hildebrandt}, H. and {Hoekstra}, H. and {Kilbinger}, M. and {Kitching}, T. and {Mellier}, Y. and {Miller}, L. and {Scodeggio}, M. and {Bonnett}, C. and {Branchini}, E. and {Davidzon}, I. and {De Lucia}, G. and {Fritz}, A. and {Fu}, L. and {Hudelot}, P. and {Hudson}, M.~J. and {Kuijken}, K. and {Leauthaud}, A. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Moscardini}, L. and {Rowe}, B.~T.~P. and {Schrabback}, T. and {Semboloni}, E. and {Velander}, M.},\n title = \"{The galaxy-halo connection from a joint lensing, clustering and abundance analysis in the CFHTLenS/VIPERS field}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: weak, galaxies: clusters: general, cosmology: observations, dark matter, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = may,\n volume = {449},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1352-1379},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv276},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1502.02867},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.1352C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Hatfield19,\n author = {{Hatfield}, P.~W. and {Laigle}, C. and {Jarvis}, M.~J. and {Devriendt}, J. and {Davidzon}, I. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Pichon}, C. and {Dubois}, Y.},\n title = \"{Comparing galaxy clustering in Horizon-AGN simulated light-cone mocks and VIDEO observations}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {techniques: photometric, galaxies: evolution, galaxies:haloes, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = dec,\n volume = {490},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5043-5056},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz2946},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1909.03843},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.5043H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Durkalec15,\n author = {{Durkalec}, A. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Pollo}, A. and {de la Torre}, S. and {Cassata}, P. and {Garilli}, B. and {Le Brun}, V. and {Lemaux}, B.~C. and {Maccagni}, D. and {Pentericci}, L. and {Tasca}, L.~A.~M. and {Thomas}, R. and {Vanzella}, E. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Zucca}, E. and {Amor{\\'\\i}n}, R. and {Bardelli}, S. and {Cassar{\\`a}}, L.~P. and {Castellano}, M. and {Cimatti}, A. and {Cucciati}, O. and {Fontana}, A. and {Giavalisco}, M. and {Grazian}, A. and {Hathi}, N.~P. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Paltani}, S. and {Ribeiro}, B. and {Schaerer}, D. and {Scodeggio}, M. and {Sommariva}, V. and {Talia}, M. and {Tresse}, L. and {Vergani}, D. and {Capak}, P. and {Charlot}, S. and {Contini}, T. and {Cuby}, J.~G. and {Dunlop}, J. and {Fotopoulou}, S. and {Koekemoer}, A. and {L{\\'o}pez-Sanjuan}, C. and {Mellier}, Y. and {Pforr}, J. and {Salvato}, M. and {Scoville}, N. and {Taniguchi}, Y. and {Wang}, P.~W.},\n title = \"{Evolution of clustering length, large-scale bias, and host halo mass at 2 < z < 5 in the VIMOS Ultra Deep Survey (VUDS){\\ensuremath{\\star}}}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: observations, methods: statistical, galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = nov,\n volume = {583},\n eid = {A128},\n pages = {A128},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201425343},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1411.5688},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...583A.128D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Hatfield18,\n author = {{Hatfield}, P.~W. and {Bowler}, R.~A.~A. and {Jarvis}, M.~J. and {Hale}, C.~L.},\n title = \"{The environment and host haloes of the brightest z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 6 Lyman-break galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {techniques: photometric, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = jul,\n volume = {477},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3760-3774},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty856},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1702.03309},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.3760H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Ishikawa20,\n author = {{Ishikawa}, Shogo and {Kashikawa}, Nobunari and {Tanaka}, Masayuki and {Coupon}, Jean and {Leauthaud}, Alexie and {Toshikawa}, Jun and {Ichikawa}, Kohei and {Oogi}, Taira and {Uchiyama}, Hisakazu and {Niino}, Yuu and {Nishizawa}, Atsushi J.},\n title = \"{The Subaru HSC Galaxy Clustering with Photometric Redshift. I. Dark Halo Masses versus Baryonic Properties of Galaxies at 0.3 {\\ensuremath{\\leq}} z {\\ensuremath{\\leq}} 1.4}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Observational cosmology, Large-scale structure of the universe, Dark matter, Galaxy dark matter halos, Dark matter distribution, Galaxy formation, Galaxy evolution, 1146, 902, 353, 1880, 356, 595, 594, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2020,\n month = dec,\n volume = {904},\n number = {2},\n eid = {128},\n pages = {128},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/abbd95},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1912.05668},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...904..128I},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n%---------------------------------- Classification quiescent / star-forming ----------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{Sherman2020,\n author = {{Sherman}, Sydney and {Jogee}, Shardha and {Florez}, Jonathan and {Stevans}, Matthew L. and {Kawinwanichakij}, Lalitwadee and {Wold}, Isak and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Papovich}, Casey and {Ciardullo}, Robin and {Gronwall}, Caryl and {Cora}, Sof{\\'\\i}a A. and {Hough}, Tom{\\'a}s and {Vega-Mart{\\'\\i}nez}, Cristian A.},\n title = \"{Investigating the growing population of massive quiescent galaxies at cosmic noon}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: distances and redshifts, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = dec,\n volume = {499},\n number = {3},\n pages = {4239-4260},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa3167},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2010.04741},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.4239S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Fang2018,\n author = {{Fang}, Jerome J. and {Faber}, S.~M. and {Koo}, David C. and {Rodr{\\'\\i}guez-Puebla}, Aldo and {Guo}, Yicheng and {Barro}, Guillermo and {Behroozi}, Peter and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Chen}, Zhu and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Gawiser}, Eric and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {McGrath}, Elizabeth J. and {McIntosh}, Daniel and {Newman}, Jeffrey A. and {Pacifici}, Camilla and {Pandya}, Viraj and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Primack}, Joel R. and {Salmon}, Brett and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {Weiner}, Benjamin and {Willner}, S.~P. and {Acquaviva}, Viviana and {Dahlen}, Tomas and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Finlator}, Kristian and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Galametz}, Audrey and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Gruetzbauch}, Ruth and {Johnson}, Seth and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Papovich}, Casey J. and {Pforr}, Janine and {Salvato}, Mara and {Santini}, P. and {van der Wel}, Arjen and {Wiklind}, Tommy and {Wuyts}, Stijn},\n title = \"{Demographics of Star-forming Galaxies since z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 2.5. I. The UVJ Diagram in CANDELS}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: high redshift, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = may,\n volume = {858},\n number = {2},\n eid = {100},\n pages = {100},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aabcba},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1710.05489},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...858..100F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Donnari2019,\n author = {{Donnari}, Martina and {Pillepich}, Annalisa and {Nelson}, Dylan and {Vogelsberger}, Mark and {Genel}, Shy and {Weinberger}, Rainer and {Marinacci}, Federico and {Springel}, Volker and {Hernquist}, Lars},\n title = \"{The star formation activity of IllustrisTNG galaxies: main sequence, UVJ diagram, quenched fractions, and systematics}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: star formation, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = jun,\n volume = {485},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4817-4840},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz712},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1812.07584},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.4817D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bluck2023,\n author = {{Bluck}, Asa F.~L. and {Piotrowska}, Joanna M. and {Maiolino}, Roberto},\n title = \"{The Fundamental Signature of Star Formation Quenching from AGN Feedback: A Critical Dependence of Quiescence on Supermassive Black Hole Mass, Not Accretion Rate}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, 594, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = feb,\n volume = {944},\n number = {1},\n eid = {108},\n pages = {108},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/acac7c},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2301.03677},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944..108B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bluck2022,\n author = {{Bluck}, Asa F.~L. and {Maiolino}, Roberto and {Brownson}, Simcha and {Conselice}, Christopher J. and {Ellison}, Sara L. and {Piotrowska}, Joanna M. and {Thorp}, Mallory D.},\n title = \"{The quenching of galaxies, bulges, and disks since cosmic noon. A machine learning approach for identifying causality in astronomical data}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: structure, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = mar,\n volume = {659},\n eid = {A160},\n pages = {A160},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202142643},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2201.07814},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...659A.160B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bluck2024,\n author = {{Bluck}, Asa F.~L. and {Conselice}, Christopher J. and {Ormerod}, Katherine and {Piotrowska}, Joanna M. and {Adams}, Nathan and {Austin}, Duncan and {Caruana}, Joseph and {Duncan}, K.~J. and {Ferreira}, Leonardo and {Goubert}, Paul and {Harvey}, Thomas and {Trussler}, James and {Maiolino}, Roberto},\n title = \"{Galaxy Quenching at the High Redshift Frontier: A Fundamental Test of Cosmological Models in the Early Universe with JWST-CEERS}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy formation, 594, 595, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = feb,\n volume = {961},\n number = {2},\n eid = {163},\n pages = {163},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad0a98},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2311.02526},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961..163B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Fontana2009,\n author = {{Fontana}, A. and {Santini}, P. and {Grazian}, A. and {Pentericci}, L. and {Fiore}, F. and {Castellano}, M. and {Giallongo}, E. and {Menci}, N. and {Salimbeni}, S. and {Cristiani}, S. and {Nonino}, M. and {Vanzella}, E.},\n title = \"{The fraction of quiescent massive galaxies in the early Universe}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = jul,\n volume = {501},\n number = {1},\n pages = {15-20},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/200911650},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0901.2898},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...501...15F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Pacifici2016,\n author = {{Pacifici}, Camilla and {Kassin}, Susan A. and {Weiner}, Benjamin J. and {Holden}, Bradford and {Gardner}, Jonathan P. and {Faber}, Sandra M. and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Koo}, David C. and {Primack}, Joel R. and {Bell}, Eric F. and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Gawiser}, Eric and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Rafelski}, Marc and {Simons}, Raymond C. and {Barro}, Guillermo and {Croton}, Darren J. and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Lee}, Seong-Kook and {Salmon}, Brett and {Somerville}, Rachel and {Behroozi}, Peter},\n title = \"{The Evolution of Star Formation Histories of Quiescent Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: statistics, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = nov,\n volume = {832},\n number = {1},\n eid = {79},\n pages = {79},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/79},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1609.03572},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...832...79P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Leja2022,\n author = {{Leja}, Joel and {Speagle}, Joshua S. and {Ting}, Yuan-Sen and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Conroy}, Charlie and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Nelson}, Erica J. and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Franx}, Marijn},\n title = \"{A New Census of the 0.2 < z < 3.0 Universe. II. The Star-forming Sequence}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy formation, Galaxy photometry, Galaxy masses, Star formation, 595, 611, 607, 1569, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = sep,\n volume = {936},\n number = {2},\n eid = {165},\n pages = {165},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac887d},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2110.04314},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...936..165L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Leja2019,\n author = {{Leja}, Joel and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Conroy}, Charlie},\n title = \"{Beyond UVJ: More Efficient Selection of Quiescent Galaxies with Ultraviolet/Mid-infrared Fluxes}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = jul,\n volume = {880},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L9},\n pages = {L9},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ab2f8c},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1907.02970},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...880L...9L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Forrest2020,\n author = {{Forrest}, Ben and {Marsan}, Z. Cemile and {Annunziatella}, Marianna and {Wilson}, Gillian and {Muzzin}, Adam and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Cooper}, M.~C. and {Chan}, Jeffrey C.~C. and {McConachie}, Ian and {Gomez}, Percy and {Kado-Fong}, Erin and {La Barbera}, Francesco and {Lange-Vagle}, Daniel and {Nantais}, Julie and {Nonino}, Mario and {Saracco}, Paolo and {Stefanon}, Mauro and {van der Burg}, Remco F.~J.},\n title = \"{The Massive Ancient Galaxies at z > 3 NEar-infrared (MAGAZ3NE) Survey: Confirmation of Extremely Rapid Star Formation and Quenching Timescales for Massive Galaxies in the Early Universe}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, High-redshift galaxies, Quenched galaxies, 594, 734, 2016, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = nov,\n volume = {903},\n number = {1},\n eid = {47},\n pages = {47},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/abb819},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2009.07281},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...903...47F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lustig2023,\n author = {{Lustig}, Peter and {Strazzullo}, Veronica and {Remus}, Rhea-Silvia and {D'Eugenio}, Chiara and {Daddi}, Emanuele and {Burkert}, Andreas and {De Lucia}, Gabriella and {Delvecchio}, Ivan and {Dolag}, Klaus and {Fontanot}, Fabio and {Gobat}, Raphael and {Mohr}, Joseph J. and {Onodera}, Masato and {Pannella}, Maurilio and {Pillepich}, Annalisa},\n title = \"{Massive quiescent galaxies at z 3: A comparison of selection, stellar population, and structural properties with simulation predictions}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = feb,\n volume = {518},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5953-5975},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac3450},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2201.09068},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.5953L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{AntwiDanso2023,\n author = {{Antwi-Danso}, Jacqueline and {Papovich}, Casey and {Leja}, Joel and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Marsan}, Z. Cemile and {Martis}, Nicholas S. and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Muzzin}, Adam and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Straatman}, Caroline M.~S. and {Tran}, Kim-Vy H.},\n title = \"{Beyond UVJ: Color Selection of Galaxies in the JWST Era}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy photometry, High-redshift galaxies, Catalogs, Surveys, 611, 734, 205, 1671, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = feb,\n volume = {943},\n number = {2},\n eid = {166},\n pages = {166},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aca294},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2207.07170},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...943..166A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Akins2022,\n author = {{Akins}, Hollis B. and {Narayanan}, Desika and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel and {Lower}, Sidney and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Feldmann}, Robert and {Kriek}, Mariska},\n title = \"{Quenching and the UVJ Diagram in the SIMBA Cosmological Simulation}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Two-color diagrams, Galaxy quenching, Post-starburst galaxies, 1724, 2040, 2176, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = apr,\n volume = {929},\n number = {1},\n eid = {94},\n pages = {94},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac5d3a},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2105.12748},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...929...94A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Arnouts2007,\n author = {{Arnouts}, S. and {Walcher}, C.~J. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Le Brun}, V. and {Pozzetti}, L. and {Bardelli}, S. and {Tresse}, L. and {Zucca}, E. and {Charlot}, S. and {Lamareille}, F. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Bolzonella}, M. and {Iovino}, A. and {Lonsdale}, C. and {Polletta}, M. and {Surace}, J. and {Bottini}, D. and {Garilli}, B. and {Maccagni}, D. and {Picat}, J.~P. and {Scaramella}, R. and {Scodeggio}, M. and {Vettolani}, G. and {Zanichelli}, A. and {Adami}, C. and {Cappi}, A. and {Ciliegi}, P. and {Contini}, T. and {de la Torre}, S. and {Foucaud}, S. and {Franzetti}, P. and {Gavignaud}, I. and {Guzzo}, L. and {Marano}, B. and {Marinoni}, C. and {Mazure}, A. and {Meneux}, B. and {Merighi}, R. and {Paltani}, S. and {Pell{\\`o}}, R. and {Pollo}, A. and {Radovich}, M. and {Temporin}, S. and {Vergani}, D.},\n title = \"{The SWIRE-VVDS-CFHTLS surveys: stellar mass assembly over the last 10 Gyr. Evidence for a major build up of the red sequence between z = 2 and z = 1}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies: formation, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = dec,\n volume = {476},\n number = {1},\n pages = {137-150},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20077632},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0705.2438},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...476..137A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Deshmukh2018,\n author = {{Deshmukh}, S. and {Caputi}, K.~I. and {Ashby}, M.~L.~N. and {Cowley}, W.~I. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Fynbo}, J.~P.~U. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Milvang-Jensen}, B. and {Ilbert}, O.},\n title = \"{The Spitzer Matching Survey of the UltraVISTA Ultra-deep Stripes (SMUVS): The Evolution of Dusty and Nondusty Galaxies with Stellar Mass at z = 2-6}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, infrared: galaxies, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = sep,\n volume = {864},\n number = {2},\n eid = {166},\n pages = {166},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aad9f5},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1712.03905},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...864..166D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Merlin2018,\n author = {{Merlin}, E. and {Fontana}, A. and {Castellano}, M. and {Santini}, P. and {Torelli}, M. and {Boutsia}, K. and {Wang}, T. and {Grazian}, A. and {Pentericci}, L. and {Schreiber}, C. and {Ciesla}, L. and {McLure}, R. and {Derriere}, S. and {Dunlop}, J.~S. and {Elbaz}, D.},\n title = \"{Chasing passive galaxies in the early Universe: a critical analysis in CANDELS GOODS-South}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: data analysis, catalogues, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: photometry, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = jan,\n volume = {473},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2098-2123},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx2385},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1709.00429},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.2098M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Labbe2005,\n author = {{Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Huang}, Jiasheng and {Franx}, Marijn and {Rudnick}, Gregory and {Barmby}, Pauline and {Daddi}, Emanuele and {van Dokkum}, Pieter G. and {Fazio}, Giovanni G. and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, Natascha M. and {Moorwood}, Alan F.~M. and {Rix}, Hans-Walter and {R{\\\"o}ttgering}, Huub and {Trujillo}, Ignacio and {van der Werf}, Paul},\n title = \"{IRAC Mid-Infrared Imaging of the Hubble Deep Field-South: Star Formation Histories and Stellar Masses of Red Galaxies at z>2}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: High-Redshift, Infrared: Galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = may,\n volume = {624},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L81-L84},\n doi = {10.1086/430700},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0504219},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...624L..81L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bluck2023a,\n author = {{Bluck}, Asa F.~L. and {Piotrowska}, Joanna M. and {Maiolino}, Roberto},\n title = \"{The Fundamental Signature of Star Formation Quenching from AGN Feedback: A Critical Dependence of Quiescence on Supermassive Black Hole Mass, Not Accretion Rate}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, 594, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = feb,\n volume = {944},\n number = {1},\n eid = {108},\n pages = {108},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/acac7c},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2301.03677},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944..108B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{DominguezSanchez2011,\n author = {{Dom{\\'\\i}nguez S{\\'a}nchez}, H. and {Pozzi}, F. and {Gruppioni}, C. and {Cimatti}, A. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Pozzetti}, L. and {McCracken}, H. and {Capak}, P. and {Le Floch}, E. and {Salvato}, M. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Carollo}, C.~M. and {Contini}, T. and {Kneib}, J. -P. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Lilly}, S.~J. and {Mainieri}, V. and {Renzini}, A. and {Scodeggio}, M. and {Bardelli}, S. and {Bolzonella}, M. and {Bongiorno}, A. and {Caputi}, K. and {Coppa}, G. and {Cucciati}, O. and {de la Torre}, S. and {de Ravel}, L. and {Franzetti}, P. and {Garilli}, B. and {Iovino}, A. and {Kampczyk}, P. and {Knobel}, C. and {Kova{\\v{c}}}, K. and {Lamareille}, F. and {Le Borgne}, J. -F. and {Le Brun}, V. and {Maier}, C. and {Mignoli}, M. and {Pell{\\'o}}, R. and {Peng}, Y. and {Perez-Montero}, E. and {Ricciardelli}, E. and {Silverman}, J.~D. and {Tanaka}, M. and {Tasca}, L.~A.~M. and {Tresse}, L. and {Vergani}, D. and {Zucca}, E.},\n title = \"{The evolution of quiescent galaxies at high redshifts (z{\\ensuremath{\\geq}} 1.4)}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = oct,\n volume = {417},\n number = {2},\n pages = {900-915},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19263.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1106.3194},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.417..900D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ilbert2010,\n author = {{Ilbert}, O. and {Salvato}, M. and {Le Floc'h}, E. and {Aussel}, H. and {Capak}, P. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Kartaltepe}, J. and {Scoville}, N. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Arnouts}, S. and {Bundy}, K. and {Cassata}, P. and {Kneib}, J. -P. and {Koekemoer}, A. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Lilly}, S. and {Surace}, J. and {Taniguchi}, Y. and {Tasca}, L. and {Thompson}, D. and {Tresse}, L. and {Zamojski}, M. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Zucca}, E.},\n title = \"{Galaxy Stellar Mass Assembly Between 0.2 < z < 2 from the S-COSMOS Survey}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = feb,\n volume = {709},\n number = {2},\n pages = {644-663},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/644},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0903.0102},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...709..644I},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@article{Gould2023,\n title={COSMOS2020: Exploring the Dawn of Quenching for Massive Galaxies at 3 < z < 5 with a New Color-selection Method},\n volume={165},\n ISSN={1538-3881},\n url={http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/accadc},\n DOI={10.3847/1538-3881/accadc},\n number={6},\n journal={The Astronomical Journal},\n publisher={American Astronomical Society},\n author={Gould, Katriona M. L. and Brammer, Gabriel and Valentino, Francesco and Whitaker, Katherine E. and Weaver, John. R. and del P. Lagos, Claudia and Rizzo, Francesca and Franco, Maximilien and Hsieh, Bau-Ching and Ilbert, Olivier and Jin, Shuowen and Magdis, Georgios and J. McCracken, Henry and Mobasher, Bahram and Shuntov, Marko and Steinhardt, Charles L. and Strait, Victoria and Toft, Sune},\n year={2023},\n month=may, pages={248} \n}\n@ARTICLE{Long2024,\n author = {{Long}, Arianna S. and {Antwi-Danso}, Jacqueline and {Lambrides}, Erini L. and {Lovell}, Christopher C. and {de la Vega}, Alexander and {Valentino}, Francesco and {Zavala}, Jorge A. and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron and {Arrabal Haro}, Pablo and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Bisigello}, Laura and {Chworowsky}, Katherine and {Cooper}, M.~C. and {Cooper}, Olivia R. and {Cooray}, Asantha R. and {Croton}, Darren and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Gould}, Katriona M.~L. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Hutchison}, Taylor A. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {McKinney}, Jed and {Nere}, Rachel and {Papovich}, Casey and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Pirzkal}, Nor and {Santini}, Paola},\n title = \"{Efficient NIRCam Selection of Quiescent Galaxies at 3 < z < 6 in CEERS}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Quenched galaxies, High-redshift galaxies, Two-color diagrams, 2016, 734, 1724, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jul,\n volume = {970},\n number = {1},\n eid = {68},\n pages = {68},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad4cea},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2305.04662},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...970...68L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n%---------------------------------- Clustering - method ----------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{Cacciato2013,\n author = {{Cacciato}, Marcello and {van den Bosch}, Frank C. and {More}, Surhud and {Mo}, Houjun and {Yang}, Xiaohu},\n title = \"{Cosmological constraints from a combination of galaxy clustering and lensing - III. Application to SDSS data}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: weak, methods: statistical, galaxies: haloes, cosmological parameters, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = apr,\n volume = {430},\n number = {2},\n pages = {767-786},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sts525},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1207.0503},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430..767C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Zheng&Weinberg2007,\n author = {{Zheng}, Zheng and {Weinberg}, David H.},\n title = \"{Breaking the Degeneracies between Cosmology and Galaxy Bias}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Cosmology: Dark Matter, Galaxies: Formation, Galaxies: Halos, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = apr,\n volume = {659},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1-28},\n doi = {10.1086/512151},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0512071},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...659....1Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hadzhiyska2020,\n author = {{Hadzhiyska}, Boryana and {Bose}, Sownak and {Eisenstein}, Daniel and {Hernquist}, Lars and {Spergel}, David N.},\n title = \"{Limitations to the `basic' HOD model and beyond}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: haloes, large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = apr,\n volume = {493},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5506-5519},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa623},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1911.02610},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.5506H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{White2009,\n author = {{White}, Martin and {Padmanabhan}, Nikhil},\n title = \"{Breaking halo occupation degeneracies with marked statistics}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = jun,\n volume = {395},\n number = {4},\n pages = {2381-2384},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14732.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0812.4288},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.395.2381W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Abazajian2005,\n author = {{Abazajian}, Kevork and {Zheng}, Zheng and {Zehavi}, Idit and {Weinberg}, David H. and {Frieman}, Joshua A. and {Berlind}, Andreas A. and {Blanton}, Michael R. and {Bahcall}, Neta A. and {Brinkmann}, J. and {Schneider}, Donald P. and {Tegmark}, Max},\n title = \"{Cosmology and the Halo Occupation Distribution from Small-Scale Galaxy Clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Formation, Galaxies: Halos, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = jun,\n volume = {625},\n number = {2},\n pages = {613-620},\n doi = {10.1086/429685},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0408003},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...625..613A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tinker2012,\n author = {{Tinker}, Jeremy L. and {Sheldon}, Erin S. and {Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Becker}, Matthew R. and {Rozo}, Eduardo and {Zu}, Ying and {Weinberg}, David H. and {Zehavi}, Idit and {Blanton}, Michael R. and {Busha}, Michael T. and {Koester}, Benjamin P.},\n title = \"{Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and the Mass-to-number Ratio of Galaxy Clusters}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmological parameters, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: halos, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = jan,\n volume = {745},\n number = {1},\n eid = {16},\n pages = {16},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/16},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1104.1635},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...745...16T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Smith2024,\n author = {{Smith}, A. and {Grove}, C. and {Cole}, S. and {Norberg}, P. and {Zarrouk}, P. and {Yuan}, S. and {Aguilar}, J. and {Ahlen}, S. and {Brooks}, D. and {Claybaugh}, T. and {de la Macorra}, A. and {Doel}, P. and {Forero-Romero}, J.~E. and {Gazta{\\~n}aga}, E. and {Gontcho}, S. Gontcho A. and {Hahn}, C. and {Kehoe}, R. and {Kremin}, A. and {Levi}, M.~E. and {Manera}, M. and {Meisner}, A. and {Miquel}, R. and {Moustakas}, J. and {Nie}, J. and {Percival}, W.~J. and {Rezaie}, M. and {Rossi}, G. and {Sanchez}, E. and {Seo}, H. and {Tarl{\\'e}}, G. and {Zhou}, Z.},\n title = \"{Generating mock galaxy catalogues for flux-limited samples like the DESI Bright Galaxy Survey}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = jul,\n volume = {532},\n number = {1},\n pages = {903-919},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae1503},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2312.08792},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532..903S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Zentner2005,\n author = {{Zentner}, Andrew R. and {Berlind}, Andreas A. and {Bullock}, James S. and {Kravtsov}, Andrey V. and {Wechsler}, Risa H.},\n title = \"{The Physics of Galaxy Clustering. I. A Model for Subhalo Populations}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Cosmology: Dark Matter, Galaxies: Formation, Galaxies: Halos, Galaxies: Structure, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = may,\n volume = {624},\n number = {2},\n pages = {505-525},\n doi = {10.1086/428898},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0411586},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...624..505Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Berlind2003,\n author = {{Berlind}, Andreas A. and {Weinberg}, David H. and {Benson}, Andrew J. and {Baugh}, Carlton M. and {Cole}, Shaun and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {Jenkins}, Adrian and {Katz}, Neal and {Lacey}, Cedric G.},\n title = \"{The Halo Occupation Distribution and the Physics of Galaxy Formation}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Formation, Galaxies: Halos, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = aug,\n volume = {593},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1-25},\n doi = {10.1086/376517},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0212357},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...593....1B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sheldon2004,\n author = {{Sheldon}, Erin S. and {Johnston}, David E. and {Frieman}, Joshua A. and {Scranton}, Ryan and {McKay}, Timothy A. and {Connolly}, A.~J. and {Budav{\\'a}ri}, Tam{\\'a}s and {Zehavi}, Idit and {Bahcall}, Neta A. and {Brinkmann}, J. and {Fukugita}, Masataka},\n title = \"{The Galaxy-Mass Correlation Function Measured from Weak Lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Cosmology: Dark Matter, Cosmology: Gravitational Lensing, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = may,\n volume = {127},\n number = {5},\n pages = {2544-2564},\n doi = {10.1086/383293},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0312036},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....127.2544S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Brainerd1996,\n author = {{Brainerd}, Tereasa G. and {Blandford}, Roger D. and {Smail}, Ian},\n title = \"{Weak Gravitational Lensing by Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: HALOS, COSMOLOGY: GRAVITATIONAL LENSING, GALAXIES: FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETERS, Astrophysics},\n year = 1996,\n month = aug,\n volume = {466},\n pages = {623},\n doi = {10.1086/177537},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9503073},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...466..623B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Simon2007,\n author = {{Simon}, P.},\n title = \"{How accurate is Limber's equation?}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = oct,\n volume = {473},\n number = {3},\n pages = {711-714},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20066352},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0609165},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...473..711S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mandelbaum2008,\n author = {{Mandelbaum}, R. and {Seljak}, U. and {Hirata}, C.~M. and {Bardelli}, S. and {Bolzonella}, M. and {Bongiorno}, A. and {Carollo}, M. and {Contini}, T. and {Cunha}, C.~E. and {Garilli}, B. and {Iovino}, A. and {Kampczyk}, P. and {Kneib}, J. -P. and {Knobel}, C. and {Koo}, D.~C. and {Lamareille}, F. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Le Borgne}, J. -F. and {Lilly}, S.~J. and {Maier}, C. and {Mainieri}, V. and {Mignoli}, M. and {Newman}, J.~A. and {Oesch}, P.~A. and {Perez-Montero}, E. and {Ricciardelli}, E. and {Scodeggio}, M. and {Silverman}, J. and {Tasca}, L.},\n title = \"{Precision photometric redshift calibration for galaxy-galaxy weak lensing}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing, galaxies: distances and redshifts, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = may,\n volume = {386},\n number = {2},\n pages = {781-806},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12947.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0709.1692},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.386..781M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Asorey2016,\n author = {{Asorey}, J. and {Carrasco Kind}, M. and {Sevilla-Noarbe}, I. and {Brunner}, R.~J. and {Thaler}, J.},\n title = \"{Galaxy clustering with photometric surveys using PDF redshift information}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: distances and redshifts, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = jun,\n volume = {459},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1293-1309},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw721},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1601.00357},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.459.1293A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Berlind&Weinberg2002,\n author = {{Berlind}, Andreas A. and {Weinberg}, David H.},\n title = \"{The Halo Occupation Distribution: Toward an Empirical Determination of the Relation between Galaxies and Mass}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Formation, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Methods: n-Body Simulations, Astrophysics},\n year = 2002,\n month = aug,\n volume = {575},\n number = {2},\n pages = {587-616},\n doi = {10.1086/341469},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0109001},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...575..587B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Moster_CV,\n author = {{Moster}, Benjamin P. and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Newman}, Jeffrey A. and {Rix}, Hans-Walter},\n title = \"{A Cosmic Variance Cookbook}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: theory, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: statistics, galaxies: stellar content, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = apr,\n volume = {731},\n number = {2},\n eid = {113},\n pages = {113},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/731/2/113},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1001.1737},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...731..113M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{RocheEales99,\n author = {{Roche}, Nathan and {Eales}, Stephen A.},\n title = \"{The angular correlation function and hierarchical moments of \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde70000 faint galaxies to R=23.5}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n year = 1999,\n month = aug,\n volume = {307},\n number = {3},\n pages = {703-721},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02652.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9803331},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.307..703R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Jarvis_treecorr,\n author = {{Jarvis}, M. and {Bernstein}, G. and {Jain}, B.},\n title = \"{The skewness of the aperture mass statistic}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = jul,\n volume = {352},\n number = {1},\n pages = {338-352},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07926.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0307393},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.352..338J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ilbert2013,\n author = {{Ilbert}, O. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Capak}, P. and {Dunlop}, J. and {Karim}, A. and {Renzini}, M.~A. and {Caputi}, K. and {Boissier}, S. and {Arnouts}, S. and {Aussel}, H. and {Comparat}, J. and {Guo}, Q. and {Hudelot}, P. and {Kartaltepe}, J. and {Kneib}, J.~P. and {Krogager}, J.~K. and {Le Floc'h}, E. and {Lilly}, S. and {Mellier}, Y. and {Milvang-Jensen}, B. and {Moutard}, T. and {Onodera}, M. and {Richard}, J. and {Salvato}, M. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Scoville}, N. and {Silverman}, J.~D. and {Taniguchi}, Y. and {Tasca}, L. and {Thomas}, R. and {Toft}, S. and {Tresse}, L. and {Vergani}, D. and {Wolk}, M. and {Zirm}, A.},\n title = \"{Mass assembly in quiescent and star-forming galaxies since z ≃ 4 from UltraVISTA}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: distances and redshifts, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = aug,\n volume = {556},\n eid = {A55},\n pages = {A55},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201321100},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1301.3157},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A..55I},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Williams2009,\n author = {{Williams}, Rik J. and {Quadri}, Ryan F. and {Franx}, Marijn and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo},\n title = \"{Detection of Quiescent Galaxies in a Bicolor Sequence from Z = 0-2}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, infrared: galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = feb,\n volume = {691},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1879-1895},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/691/2/1879},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0806.0625},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...691.1879W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Shuntov22,\n author = {{Shuntov}, M. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Gavazzi}, R. and {Laigle}, C. and {Weaver}, J.~R. and {Davidzon}, I. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Kauffmann}, O.~B. and {Faisst}, A. and {Dubois}, Y. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Moneti}, A. and {Milvang-Jensen}, B. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Toft}, S.},\n title = \"{COSMOS2020: Cosmic evolution of the stellar-to-halo mass relation for central and satellite galaxies up to z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 5}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: halos, galaxies: evolution, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = aug,\n volume = {664},\n eid = {A61},\n pages = {A61},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202243136},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2203.10895},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...664A..61S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Ilbert21_Nz,\n author = {{Euclid Collaboration: Ilbert}, O. and {de la Torre}, S. and {Martinet}, N. and {Wright}, A.~H. and {Paltani}, S. and {Laigle}, C. and {Davidzon}, I. and {Jullo}, E. and {Hildebrandt}, H. and {Masters}, D.~C. and {Amara}, A. and {Conselice}, C.~J. and {Andreon}, S. and {Auricchio}, N. and {Azzollini}, R. and {Baccigalupi}, C. and {Balaguera-Antol{\\'\\i}nez}, A. and {Baldi}, M. and {Balestra}, A. and {Bardelli}, S. and {Bender}, R. and {Biviano}, A. and {Bodendorf}, C. and {Bonino}, D. and {Borgani}, S. and {Boucaud}, A. and {Bozzo}, E. and {Branchini}, E. and {Brescia}, M. and {Burigana}, C. and {Cabanac}, R. and {Camera}, S. and {Capobianco}, V. and {Cappi}, A. and {Carbone}, C. and {Carretero}, J. and {Carvalho}, C.~S. and {Casas}, S. and {Castander}, F.~J. and {Castellano}, M. and {Castignani}, G. and {Cavuoti}, S. and {Cimatti}, A. and {Cledassou}, R. and {Colodro-Conde}, C. and {Congedo}, G. and {Conversi}, L. and {Copin}, Y. and {Corcione}, L. and {Costille}, A. and {Coupon}, J. and {Courtois}, H.~M. and {Cropper}, M. and {Cuby}, J. and {Da Silva}, A. and {Degaudenzi}, H. and {Di Ferdinando}, D. and {Dubath}, F. and {Duncan}, C. and {Dupac}, X. and {Dusini}, S. and {Ealet}, A. and {Fabricius}, M. and {Farrens}, S. and {Ferreira}, P.~G. and {Finelli}, F. and {Fosalba}, P. and {Fotopoulou}, S. and {Franceschi}, E. and {Franzetti}, P. and {Galeotta}, S. and {Garilli}, B. and {Gillard}, W. and {Gillis}, B. and {Giocoli}, C. and {Gozaliasl}, G. and {Graci{\\'a}-Carpio}, J. and {Grupp}, F. and {Guzzo}, L. and {Haugan}, S.~V.~H. and {Holmes}, W. and {Hormuth}, F. and {Jahnke}, K. and {Keihanen}, E. and {Kermiche}, S. and {Kiessling}, A. and {Kirkpatrick}, C.~C. and {Kunz}, M. and {Kurki-Suonio}, H. and {Ligori}, S. and {Lilje}, P.~B. and {Lloro}, I. and {Maino}, D. and {Maiorano}, E. and {Marggraf}, O. and {Markovic}, K. and {Marulli}, F. and {Massey}, R. and {Maturi}, M. and {Mauri}, N. and {Maurogordato}, S. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Medinaceli}, E. and {Mei}, S. and {Metcalf}, R. Benton and {Moresco}, M. and {Morin}, B. and {Moscardini}, L. and {Munari}, E. and {Nakajima}, R. and {Neissner}, C. and {Niemi}, S. and {Nightingale}, J. and {Padilla}, C. and {Pasian}, F. and {Patrizii}, L. and {Pedersen}, K. and {Pello}, R. and {Pettorino}, V. and {Pires}, S. and {Polenta}, G. and {Poncet}, M. and {Popa}, L. and {Potter}, D. and {Pozzetti}, L. and {Raison}, F. and {Renzi}, A. and {Rhodes}, J. and {Riccio}, G. and {Romelli}, E. and {Roncarelli}, M. and {Rossetti}, E. and {Saglia}, R. and {S{\\'a}nchez}, A.~G. and {Sapone}, D. and {Schneider}, P. and {Schrabback}, T. and {Scottez}, V. and {Secroun}, A. and {Seidel}, G. and {Serrano}, S. and {Sirignano}, C. and {Sirri}, G. and {Stanco}, L. and {Sureau}, F. and {Tallada Cresp{\\'a}}, P. and {Tenti}, M. and {Teplitz}, H.~I. and {Tereno}, I. and {Toledo-Moreo}, R. and {Torradeflot}, F. and {Tramacere}, A. and {Valentijn}, E.~A. and {Valenziano}, L. and {Valiviita}, J. and {Vassallo}, T. and {Wang}, Y. and {Welikala}, N. and {Weller}, J. and {Whittaker}, L. and {Zacchei}, A. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Zoubian}, J. and {Zucca}, E.},\n title = \"{Euclid preparation. XI. Mean redshift determination from galaxy redshift probabilities for cosmic shear tomography}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {dark energy, galaxies: distances and redshifts, methods: statistical, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = mar,\n volume = {647},\n eid = {A117},\n pages = {A117},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202040237},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2101.02228},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...647A.117E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Franco2024,\n author = {{Franco}, Maximilien and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Chworowsky}, Katherine and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Lovell}, Christopher C. and {Maraston}, Claudia and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {McKinney}, Jed and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Champagne}, Jaclyn B. and {Cooper}, Olivia R. and {Ding}, Xuheng and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Enia}, Andrea and {Gillman}, Steven and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Harish}, Santosh and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Laigle}, Clotilde and {Long}, Arianna S. and {Magdis}, Georgios and {Mahler}, Guillaume and {Martin}, Crystal L. and {Massey}, Richard and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Renzini}, Alvio and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Rich}, R. Michael and {Sheth}, Kartik and {Silverman}, John D. and {Sparre}, Martin and {Talia}, Margherita and {Trakhtenbrot}, Benny and {Valentino}, Francesco and {Vijayan}, Aswin P. and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Yang}, Lilan and {Zavala}, Jorge A.},\n title = \"{Unveiling the Distant Universe: Characterizing z {\\ensuremath{\\geq}} 9 Galaxies in the First Epoch of COSMOS-Web}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Early universe, Galaxy evolution, High-redshift galaxies, Galaxy formation, 435, 594, 734, 595, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = sep,\n volume = {973},\n number = {1},\n eid = {23},\n pages = {23},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad5e6a},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2308.00751},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...973...23F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Casey23_CWeb,\n author = {{Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Harish}, Santosh and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Rose}, Caitlin and {Cox}, Isabella G. and {Nightingale}, James W. and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Silverman}, John D. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Massey}, Richard and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Allen}, Natalie and {Amvrosiadis}, Aristeidis and {Arango-Toro}, Rafael C. and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Bongiorno}, Angela and {Capak}, Peter L. and {Champagne}, Jaclyn B. and {Chartab}, Nima and {Ch{\\'a}vez Ortiz}, {\\'O}scar A. and {Chworowsky}, Katherine and {Cooke}, Kevin C. and {Cooper}, Olivia R. and {Darvish}, Behnam and {Ding}, Xuheng and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Gentile}, Fabrizio and {Gillman}, Steven and {Gould}, Katriona M.~L. and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {He}, Qiuhan and {Hemmati}, Shoubaneh and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Jahnke}, Knud and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Khostovan}, Ali Ahmad and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Lambrides}, Erini and {Laigle}, Clotilde and {Larson}, Rebecca L. and {Leung}, Gene C.~K. and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Liaudat}, Tobias and {Long}, Arianna S. and {Magdis}, Georgios and {Mahler}, Guillaume and {Mainieri}, Vincenzo and {Manning}, Sinclaire M. and {Maraston}, Claudia and {Martin}, Crystal L. and {McCleary}, Jacqueline E. and {McKinney}, Jed and {McPartland}, Conor J.~R. and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Pattnaik}, Rohan and {Renzini}, Alvio and {Rich}, R. Michael and {Sanders}, David B. and {Sattari}, Zahra and {Scognamiglio}, Diana and {Scoville}, Nick and {Sheth}, Kartik and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Sparre}, Martin and {Suzuki}, Tomoko L. and {Talia}, Margherita and {Toft}, Sune and {Trakhtenbrot}, Benny and {Urry}, C. Megan and {Valentino}, Francesco and {Vanderhoof}, Brittany N. and {Vardoulaki}, Eleni and {Weaver}, John R. and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Yang}, Lilan and {Zavala}, Jorge A.},\n title = \"{COSMOS-Web: An Overview of the JWST Cosmic Origins Survey}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Sky surveys, Large-scale structure of the universe, Galaxy evolution, Reionization, Weak gravitational lensing, 1464, 902, 594, 1383, 1797, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = sep,\n volume = {954},\n number = {1},\n eid = {31},\n pages = {31},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/acc2bc},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2211.07865},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954...31C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{Bertin20_SEPP,\n author = {{Bertin}, E. and {Schefer}, M. and {Apostolakos}, N. and {{\\'A}lvarez-Ayll{\\'o}n}, A. and {Dubath}, P. and {K{\\\"u}mmel}, M.},\n title = \"{The SourceXtractor++ Software}\",\n booktitle = {Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIX},\n year = 2020,\n editor = {{Pizzo}, R. and {Deul}, E.~R. and {Mol}, J.~D. and {de Plaa}, J. and {Verkouter}, H.},\n series = {Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series},\n volume = {527},\n month = jan,\n pages = {461},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ASPC..527..461B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{Kummel20_SEPP,\n author = {{K{\\\"u}mmel}, M. and {Bertin}, E. and {Schefer}, M. and {Apostolakos}, N. and {{\\'A}lvarez-Ayll{\\'o}n}, A. and {Dubath}, P.},\n title = \"{Working With the SourceXtractor++ Software}\",\n booktitle = {Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIX},\n year = 2020,\n editor = {{Pizzo}, R. and {Deul}, E.~R. and {Mol}, J.~D. and {de Plaa}, J. and {Verkouter}, H.},\n series = {Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series},\n volume = {527},\n month = jan,\n pages = {29},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ASPC..527...29K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Ilbert2015,\n author = {{Ilbert}, O. and {Arnouts}, S. and {Le Floc'h}, E. and {Aussel}, H. and {Bethermin}, M. and {Capak}, P. and {Hsieh}, B. -C. and {Kajisawa}, M. and {Karim}, A. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Lee}, N. and {Lilly}, S. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Michel-Dansac}, L. and {Moutard}, T. and {Renzini}, M.~A. and {Salvato}, M. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Scoville}, N. and {Sheth}, K. and {Silverman}, J.~D. and {Smol{\\v{c}}i{\\'c}}, V. and {Taniguchi}, Y. and {Tresse}, L.},\n title = \"{Evolution of the specific star formation rate function at z< 1.4 Dissecting the mass-SFR plane in COSMOS and GOODS}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies: stellar content, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: statistics, galaxies: formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = jul,\n volume = {579},\n eid = {A2},\n pages = {A2},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201425176},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1410.4875},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...579A...2I},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Arnouts13,\n author = {{Arnouts}, S. and {Le Floc'h}, E. and {Chevallard}, J. and {Johnson}, B.~D. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Treyer}, M. and {Aussel}, H. and {Capak}, P. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Scoville}, N. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Milliard}, B. and {Pozzetti}, L. and {Salvato}, M.},\n title = \"{Encoding of the infrared excess in the NUVrK color diagram for star-forming galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {infrared: galaxies, ultraviolet: galaxies, galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = oct,\n volume = {558},\n eid = {A67},\n pages = {A67},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201321768},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1309.0008},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...558A..67A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Murray13_HMFcalc,\n author = {{Murray}, S.~G. and {Power}, C. and {Robotham}, A.~S.~G.},\n title = \"{HMFcalc: An online tool for calculating dark matter halo mass functions}\",\n journal = {Astronomy and Computing},\n keywords = {Cosmology: dark matter, Cosmology: theory, Methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = nov,\n volume = {3},\n eid = {23},\n pages = {23},\n doi = {10.1016/j.ascom.2013.11.001},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1306.6721},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&C.....3...23M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Murray20_halomod,\n author = {{Murray}, S.~G. and {Diemer}, B. and {Chen}, Z. and {Neuhold}, A.~G. and {Schnapp}, M.~A. and {Peruzzi}, T. and {Blevins}, D. and {Engelman}, T.},\n title = \"{THEHALOMOD: An online calculator for the halo model}\",\n journal = {Astronomy and Computing},\n keywords = {Large-scale structure of universe, Dark matter, Galaxies: halos, Methods: analytical, Methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2021,\n month = jul,\n volume = {36},\n eid = {100487},\n pages = {100487},\n doi = {10.1016/j.ascom.2021.100487},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2009.14066},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&C....3600487M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Szapudi&Szalay1998,\n author = {{Szapudi}, Istv{\\'a}n and {Szalay}, Alexander S.},\n title = \"{A New Class of Estimators for the N-Point Correlations}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {COSMOLOGY: LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSE, METHODS: STATISTICAL, GALAXIES: STATISTICS, COSMOLOGY: THEORY, Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Statistics, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Methods: Statistical},\n year = 1998,\n month = feb,\n volume = {494},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L41-L44},\n doi = {10.1086/311146},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...494L..41S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{LandySzalay93,\n author = {{Landy}, Stephen D. and {Szalay}, Alexander S.},\n title = \"{Bias and Variance of Angular Correlation Functions}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Angular Correlation, Bias, Computational Astrophysics, Galactic Clusters, Variance, Correlation Coefficients, Monte Carlo Method, Random Variables, Astrophysics, GALAXIES: CLUSTERING, METHODS: NUMERICAL},\n year = 1993,\n month = jul,\n volume = {412},\n pages = {64},\n doi = {10.1086/172900},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...412...64L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Hatfield&Jarvis17,\n author = {{Hatfield}, P.~W. and {Jarvis}, M.~J.},\n title = \"{Environmental quenching and galactic conformity in the galaxy cross-correlation signal}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {techniques: photometric - galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = dec,\n volume = {472},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3570-3588},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx2155},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1606.08989},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472.3570H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n%---------------------------------- Modeling ----------------------------------\n\n@ARTICLE{Zheng05,\n author = {{Zheng}, Zheng and {Berlind}, Andreas A. and {Weinberg}, David H. and {Benson}, Andrew J. and {Baugh}, Carlton M. and {Cole}, Shaun and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {Katz}, Neal and {Lacey}, Cedric G.},\n title = \"{Theoretical Models of the Halo Occupation Distribution: Separating Central and Satellite Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Formation, Galaxies: Halos, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = nov,\n volume = {633},\n number = {2},\n pages = {791-809},\n doi = {10.1086/466510},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0408564},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...633..791Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Tinker10,\n author = {{Tinker}, Jeremy L. and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Kravtsov}, Andrey V. and {Klypin}, Anatoly and {Warren}, Michael S. and {Yepes}, Gustavo and {Gottl{\\\"o}ber}, Stefan},\n title = \"{The Large-scale Bias of Dark Matter Halos: Numerical Calibration and Model Tests}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of universe, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = dec,\n volume = {724},\n number = {2},\n pages = {878-886},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/724/2/878},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1001.3162},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...724..878T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Jose13,\n author = {{Jose}, Charles and {Subramanian}, Kandaswamy and {Srianand}, Raghunathan and {Samui}, Saumyadip},\n title = \"{Spatial clustering of high-redshift Lyman-break galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: statistics, cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = mar,\n volume = {429},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2333-2350},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sts503},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1208.2097},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429.2333J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Reed09,\n author = {{Reed}, Darren S. and {Bower}, Richard and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {Jenkins}, Adrian and {Theuns}, Tom},\n title = \"{The clustering of the first galaxy haloes}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: N-body simulations, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, dark matter, Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = apr,\n volume = {394},\n number = {2},\n pages = {624-632},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14333.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0804.0004},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.394..624R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Jose16,\n author = {{Jose}, Charles and {Lacey}, Cedric G. and {Baugh}, Carlton M.},\n title = \"{The clustering of dark matter haloes: scale-dependent bias on quasi-linear scales}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: haloes, galaxies: statistics, cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = nov,\n volume = {463},\n number = {1},\n pages = {270-281},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw1702},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1509.06715},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.463..270J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Jose17,\n author = {{Jose}, Charles and {Baugh}, Carlton M. and {Lacey}, Cedric G. and {Subramanian}, Kandaswamy},\n title = \"{Understanding the non-linear clustering of high-redshift galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: haloes, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: statistics, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2017,\n month = aug,\n volume = {469},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4428-4436},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx1014},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1702.00853},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469.4428J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Chabrier03,\n author = {{Chabrier}, Gilles},\n title = \"{Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function}\",\n journal = {\\pasp},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Luminosity Function, Mass Function, Invited Reviews, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = jul,\n volume = {115},\n number = {809},\n pages = {763-795},\n doi = {10.1086/376392},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0304382},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASP..115..763C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kroupa2001,\n author = {{Kroupa}, Pavel},\n title = \"{On the variation of the initial mass function}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {BINARIES: GENERAL, STARS: FORMATION, STARS: KINEMATICS, STARS: LUMINOSITY FUNCTION, MASS FUNCTION, GLOBULAR CLUSTERS: GENERAL, OPEN CLUSTERS AND ASSOCIATIONS: GENERAL, Astrophysics},\n year = 2001,\n month = apr,\n volume = {322},\n number = {2},\n pages = {231-246},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0009005},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.322..231K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Salpeter1955,\n author = {{Salpeter}, Edwin E.},\n title = \"{The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1955,\n month = jan,\n volume = {121},\n pages = {161},\n doi = {10.1086/145971},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1955ApJ...121..161S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bryan&Norman1998,\n author = {{Bryan}, Greg L. and {Norman}, Michael L.},\n title = \"{Statistical Properties of X-Ray Clusters: Analytic and Numerical Comparisons}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERAL, METHODS: NUMERICAL, X-RAYS: GALAXIES, Galaxies: Clusters: General, Methods: Numerical, X-Rays: Galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 1998,\n month = mar,\n volume = {495},\n number = {1},\n pages = {80-99},\n doi = {10.1086/305262},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9710107},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...495...80B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Leauthaud11,\n author = {{Leauthaud}, Alexie and {Tinker}, Jeremy and {Behroozi}, Peter S. and {Busha}, Michael T. and {Wechsler}, Risa H.},\n title = \"{A Theoretical Framework for Combining Techniques that Probe the Link Between Galaxies and Dark Matter}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, dark matter, gravitational lensing: weak, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = sep,\n volume = {738},\n number = {1},\n eid = {45},\n pages = {45},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/738/1/45},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1103.2077},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...738...45L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Conroy2006,\n author = {{Conroy}, Charlie and {Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Kravtsov}, Andrey V.},\n title = \"{Modeling Luminosity-dependent Galaxy Clustering through Cosmic Time}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Cosmology: Dark Matter, Galaxies: Clusters: General, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Halos, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = aug,\n volume = {647},\n number = {1},\n pages = {201-214},\n doi = {10.1086/503602},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0512234},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...647..201C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Contreras2023a,\n author = {{Contreras}, Sergio and {Angulo}, Raul E. and {Springel}, Volker and {White}, Simon D.~M. and {Hadzhiyska}, Boryana and {Hernquist}, Lars and {Pakmor}, R{\\\"u}diger and {Kannan}, Rahul and {Hern{\\'a}ndez-Aguayo}, C{\\'e}sar and {Barrera}, Monica and {Ferlito}, Fulvio and {Delgado}, Ana Maria and {Bose}, Sownak and {Frenk}, Carlos},\n title = \"{The MillenniumTNG Project: inferring cosmology from galaxy clustering with accelerated N-body scaling and subhalo abundance matching}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: statistics, large-scale structure of universe, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = sep,\n volume = {524},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2489-2506},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac3699},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2210.10075},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.2489C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Contreras2023,\n author = {{Contreras}, Sergio and {Zehavi}, Idit},\n title = \"{On the origin of the evolution of the halo occupation distribution}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: statistics, large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = nov,\n volume = {525},\n number = {3},\n pages = {4257-4269},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad2452},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2305.19628},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.4257C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Porras-Valverde2024,\n author = {{Porras-Valverde}, Antonio J. and {Forbes}, John C. and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Stevens}, Adam R.~H. and {Holley-Bockelmann}, Kelly and {Berlind}, Andreas A. and {Genel}, Shy},\n title = \"{Why Do Semianalytic Models Predict Higher Scatter in the Stellar Mass{\\textendash}Halo Mass Relation Than Cosmological Hydrodynamic Simulations?}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy formation, Galaxy evolution, Astronomical simulations, Hydrodynamical simulations, 595, 594, 1857, 767, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = nov,\n volume = {976},\n number = {1},\n eid = {148},\n pages = {148},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad7b0f},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2310.11507},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...976..148P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n%---------------------------------- Catalogs ----------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{Weaver2023b,\n author = {{Weaver}, J.~R. and {Zalesky}, L. and {Kokorev}, V. and {McPartland}, C.~J.~R. and {Chartab}, N. and {Gould}, K.~M.~L. and {Shuntov}, M. and {Davidzon}, I. and {Faisst}, A. and {Stickley}, N. and {Capak}, P.~L. and {Toft}, S. and {Masters}, D. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Kauffmann}, O.~B. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Brammer}, G. and {Moneti}, A.},\n title = \"{The Farmer: A Reproducible Profile-fitting Photometry Package for Deep Galaxy Surveys}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Photometry, Astrostatistics, Catalogs, 1234, 1882, 205, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = nov,\n volume = {269},\n number = {1},\n eid = {20},\n pages = {20},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4365/acf850},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2310.07757},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJS..269...20W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Salvato2011,\n author = {{Salvato}, M. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Hasinger}, G. and {Rau}, A. and {Civano}, F. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Brusa}, M. and {Elvis}, M. and {Vignali}, C. and {Aussel}, H. and {Comastri}, A. and {Fiore}, F. and {Le Floc'h}, E. and {Mainieri}, V. and {Bardelli}, S. and {Bolzonella}, M. and {Bongiorno}, A. and {Capak}, P. and {Caputi}, K. and {Cappelluti}, N. and {Carollo}, C.~M. and {Contini}, T. and {Garilli}, B. and {Iovino}, A. and {Fotopoulou}, S. and {Fruscione}, A. and {Gilli}, R. and {Halliday}, C. and {Kneib}, J. -P. and {Kakazu}, Y. and {Kartaltepe}, J.~S. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Kovac}, K. and {Ideue}, Y. and {Ikeda}, H. and {Impey}, C.~D. and {Le Fevre}, O. and {Lamareille}, F. and {Lanzuisi}, G. and {Le Borgne}, J. -F. and {Le Brun}, V. and {Lilly}, S. and {Maier}, C. and {Manohar}, S. and {Masters}, D. and {McCracken}, H. and {Messias}, H. and {Mignoli}, M. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Nagao}, T. and {Pello}, R. and {Puccetti}, S. and {Perez-Montero}, E. and {Renzini}, A. and {Sargent}, M. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Scodeggio}, M. and {Scoville}, N. and {Shopbell}, P. and {Silvermann}, J. and {Taniguchi}, Y. and {Tasca}, L. and {Tresse}, L. and {Trump}, J.~R. and {Zucca}, E.},\n title = \"{Dissecting Photometric Redshift for Active Galactic Nucleus Using XMM- and Chandra-COSMOS Samples}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: distances and redshifts, methods: data analysis, surveys, techniques: photometric, X-rays: galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = dec,\n volume = {742},\n number = {2},\n eid = {61},\n pages = {61},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/61},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1108.6061},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...742...61S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kauffmann2022,\n author = {{Kauffmann}, O.~B. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Weaver}, J.~R. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Milvang-Jensen}, B. and {Brammer}, G. and {Davidzon}, I. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Liu}, D. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Moneti}, A. and {Shuntov}, M. and {Toft}, S. and {Casey}, C.~M. and {Dunlop}, J.~S. and {Kartaltepe}, J.~S. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Tresse}, L.},\n title = \"{COSMOS2020: UV-selected galaxies at z {\\ensuremath{\\geq}} 7.5}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: photometry, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = nov,\n volume = {667},\n eid = {A65},\n pages = {A65},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202243088},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2207.11740},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...667A..65K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@software{Brammer2022,\n author = {Brammer, Gabriel},\n title = {{msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools}},\n version = {0.3},\n doi = {10.5281/zenodo.7299500},\n year = {2022},\n month = nov,\n url = {https://github.com/gbrammer/msaexp}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Heintz2024,\n author = {{Heintz}, Kasper E. and {Watson}, Darach and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Vejlgaard}, Simone and {Hutter}, Anne and {Strait}, Victoria B. and {Matthee}, Jorryt and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Jakobsson}, P{\\'a}ll and {Tanvir}, Nial R. and {Laursen}, Peter and {Naidu}, Rohan P. and {Mason}, Charlotte A. and {Killi}, Meghana and {Jung}, Intae and {Hsiao}, Tiger Yu-Yang and {Abdurro'uf} and {Coe}, Dan and {Arrabal Haro}, Pablo and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Toft}, Sune},\n title = \"{Strong damped Lyman-{\\ensuremath{\\alpha}} absorption in young star-forming galaxies at redshifts 9 to 11}\",\n journal = {Science},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = may,\n volume = {384},\n number = {6698},\n pages = {890-894},\n doi = {10.1126/science.adj0343},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2306.00647},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Sci...384..890H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bethermin2012,\n author = {{B{\\'e}thermin}, Matthieu and {Daddi}, Emanuele and {Magdis}, Georgios and {Sargent}, Mark T. and {Hezaveh}, Yashar and {Elbaz}, David and {Le Borgne}, Damien and {Mullaney}, James and {Pannella}, Maurilio and {Buat}, V{\\'e}ronique and {Charmandaris}, Vassilis and {Lagache}, Guilaine and {Scott}, Douglas},\n title = \"{A Unified Empirical Model for Infrared Galaxy Counts Based on the Observed Physical Evolution of Distant Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: statistics, infrared: galaxies, submillimeter: galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = oct,\n volume = {757},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L23},\n pages = {L23},\n doi = {10.1088/2041-8205/757/2/L23},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1208.6512},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757L..23B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Magdis2012,\n author = {{Magdis}, Georgios E. and {Daddi}, E. and {B{\\'e}thermin}, M. and {Sargent}, M. and {Elbaz}, D. and {Pannella}, M. and {Dickinson}, M. and {Dannerbauer}, H. and {da Cunha}, E. and {Walter}, F. and {Rigopoulou}, D. and {Charmandaris}, V. and {Hwang}, H.~S. and {Kartaltepe}, J.},\n title = \"{The Evolving Interstellar Medium of Star-forming Galaxies since z = 2 as Probed by Their Infrared Spectral Energy Distributions}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = nov,\n volume = {760},\n number = {1},\n eid = {6},\n pages = {6},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/6},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1210.1035},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...760....6M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Skelton2014,\n author = {{Skelton}, Rosalind E. and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Momcheva}, Ivelina G. and {Brammer}, Gabriel B. and {van Dokkum}, Pieter G. and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Franx}, Marijn and {van der Wel}, Arjen and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Da Cunha}, Elisabete and {Fumagalli}, Mattia and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, Natascha and {Kriek}, Mariska and {Leja}, Joel and {Lundgren}, Britt F. and {Magee}, Daniel and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {Nelson}, Erica J. and {Oesch}, Pascal and {Pacifici}, Camilla and {Patel}, Shannon G. and {Price}, Sedona and {Rix}, Hans-Walter and {Tal}, Tomer and {Wake}, David A. and {Wuyts}, Stijn},\n title = \"{3D-HST WFC3-selected Photometric Catalogs in the Five CANDELS/3D-HST Fields: Photometry, Photometric Redshifts, and Stellar Masses}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {catalogs, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: general, methods: data analysis, techniques: photometric, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = oct,\n volume = {214},\n number = {2},\n eid = {24},\n pages = {24},\n doi = {10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/24},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1403.3689},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..214...24S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Gawiser2006,\n author = {{Gawiser}, Eric and {van Dokkum}, Pieter G. and {Herrera}, David and {Maza}, Jos{\\'e} and {Castander}, Francisco J. and {Infante}, Leopoldo and {Lira}, Paulina and {Quadri}, Ryan and {Toner}, Ruth and {Treister}, Ezequiel and {Urry}, C. Megan and {Altmann}, Martin and {Assef}, Roberto and {Christlein}, Daniel and {Coppi}, Paolo S. and {Dur{\\'a}n}, Mar{\\'I}a Fernanda and {Franx}, Marijn and {Galaz}, Gaspar and {Huerta}, Leonor and {Liu}, Charles and {L{\\'o}pez}, Sebasti{\\'a}n and {M{\\'e}ndez}, Ren{\\'e} and {Moore}, David C. and {Rubio}, M{\\'o}nica and {Ruiz}, Mar{\\'I}a Teresa and {Toft}, Sune and {Yi}, Sukyoung K.},\n title = \"{The Multiwavelength Survey by Yale-Chile (MUSYC): Survey Design and Deep Public UBVRIz' Images and Catalogs of the Extended Hubble Deep Field-South}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Galaxies: High-Redshift, Galaxies: Photometry, Surveys, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = jan,\n volume = {162},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1-19},\n doi = {10.1086/497644},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0509202},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJS..162....1G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Labbe2003,\n author = {{Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Franx}, Marijn and {Rudnick}, Gregory and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, Natascha M. and {Rix}, Hans-Walter and {Moorwood}, Alan and {van Dokkum}, Pieter G. and {van der Werf}, Paul and {R{\\\"o}ttgering}, Huub and {van Starkenburg}, Lottie and {van der Wel}, Arjen and {Kuijken}, Konrad and {Daddi}, Emanuele},\n title = \"{Ultradeep Near-Infrared ISAAC Observations of the Hubble Deep Field South: Observations, Reduction, Multicolor Catalog, and Photometric Redshifts}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: High-Redshift, Galaxies: Photometry, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = mar,\n volume = {125},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1107-1123},\n doi = {10.1086/346140},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0212236},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....125.1107L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Rieke2023b,\n author = {{Rieke}, Marcia J. and {Robertson}, Brant and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Hainline}, Kevin and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Hausen}, Ryan and {Ji}, Zhiyuan and {Willmer}, Christopher N.~A. and {Eisenstein}, Daniel J. and {Pusk{\\'a}s}, D{\\'a}vid and {Alberts}, Stacey and {Arribas}, Santiago and {Baker}, William M. and {Baum}, Stefi and {Bhatawdekar}, Rachana and {Bonaventura}, Nina and {Boyett}, Kristan and {Bunker}, Andrew J. and {Cameron}, Alex J. and {Carniani}, Stefano and {Charlot}, Stephane and {Chevallard}, Jacopo and {Chen}, Zuyi and {Curti}, Mirko and {Curtis-Lake}, Emma and {Danhaive}, A. Lola and {DeCoursey}, Christa and {Dressler}, Alan and {Egami}, Eiichi and {Endsley}, Ryan and {Helton}, Jakob M. and {Hviding}, Raphael E. and {Kumari}, Nimisha and {Looser}, Tobias J. and {Lyu}, Jianwei and {Maiolino}, Roberto and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {Nelson}, Erica J. and {Rieke}, George and {Rix}, Hans-Walter and {Sandles}, Lester and {Saxena}, Aayush and {Sharpe}, Katherine and {Shivaei}, Irene and {Skarbinski}, Maya and {Smit}, Renske and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {Stone}, Meredith and {Suess}, Katherine A. and {Sun}, Fengwu and {Topping}, Michael and {{\\\"U}bler}, Hannah and {Villanueva}, Natalia C. and {Wallace}, Imaan E.~B. and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Willott}, Chris and {Whitler}, Lily and {Witstok}, Joris and {Woodrum}, Charity},\n title = \"{JADES Initial Data Release for the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Revealing the Faint Infrared Sky with Deep JWST NIRCam Imaging}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {High-redshift galaxies, 734, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = nov,\n volume = {269},\n number = {1},\n eid = {16},\n pages = {16},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4365/acf44d},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2306.02466},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJS..269...16R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Stefanon2017a,\n author = {{Stefanon}, Mauro and {Yan}, Haojing and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Barro}, Guillermo and {Donley}, Jennifer L. and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Hemmati}, Shoubaneh and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Lee}, BoMee and {Lee}, Seong-Kook and {Nayyeri}, Hooshang and {Peth}, Michael and {Pforr}, Janine and {Salvato}, Mara and {Wiklind}, Tommy and {Wuyts}, Stijn and {Ashby}, Matthew L.~N. and {Castellano}, Marco and {Conselice}, Christopher J. and {Cooper}, Michael C. and {Cooray}, Asantha R. and {Dolch}, Timothy and {Ferguson}, Henry and {Galametz}, Audrey and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Guo}, Yicheng and {Willner}, Steven P. and {Dickinson}, Mark E. and {Faber}, Sandra M. and {Fazio}, Giovanni G. and {Gardner}, Jonathan P. and {Gawiser}, Eric and {Grazian}, Andrea and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Kocevski}, Dale and {Koo}, David C. and {Lee}, Kyoung-Soo and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {McGrath}, Elizabeth J. and {Nandra}, Kirpal and {Newman}, Jeffrey A. and {van der Wel}, Arjen},\n title = \"{CANDELS Multi-wavelength Catalogs: Source Identification and Photometry in the CANDELS Extended Groth Strip}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {catalogs, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: photometry, methods: data analysis, techniques: photometric, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = apr,\n volume = {229},\n number = {2},\n eid = {32},\n pages = {32},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4365/aa66cb},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1703.05768},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJS..229...32S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Nayyeri2017,\n author = {{Nayyeri}, H. and {Hemmati}, S. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Ferguson}, H.~C. and {Cooray}, A. and {Barro}, G. and {Faber}, S.~M. and {Dickinson}, M. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Peth}, M. and {Salvato}, M. and {Ashby}, M.~L.~N. and {Darvish}, B. and {Donley}, J. and {Durbin}, M. and {Finkelstein}, S. and {Fontana}, A. and {Grogin}, N.~A. and {Gruetzbauch}, R. and {Huang}, K. and {Khostovan}, A.~A. and {Kocevski}, D. and {Kodra}, D. and {Lee}, B. and {Newman}, J. and {Pacifici}, C. and {Pforr}, J. and {Stefanon}, M. and {Wiklind}, T. and {Willner}, S.~P. and {Wuyts}, S. and {Castellano}, M. and {Conselice}, C. and {Dolch}, T. and {Dunlop}, J.~S. and {Galametz}, A. and {Hathi}, N.~P. and {Lucas}, R.~A. and {Yan}, H.},\n title = \"{CANDELS Multi-wavelength Catalogs: Source Identification and Photometry in the CANDELS COSMOS Survey Field}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {catalogs, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: photometry, methods: data analysis, techniques: image processing, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = jan,\n volume = {228},\n number = {1},\n eid = {7},\n pages = {7},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4365/228/1/7},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1612.07364},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJS..228....7N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{GuoY2013,\n author = {{Guo}, Yicheng and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Barro}, Guillermo and {Willner}, S.~P. and {Ashby}, Matthew L.~N. and {Dahlen}, Tomas and {Donley}, Jennifer L. and {Faber}, Sandra M. and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Galametz}, Audrey and {Grazian}, Andrea and {Huang}, Kuang-Han and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Koo}, David C. and {McGrath}, Elizabeth J. and {Peth}, Michael and {Salvato}, Mara and {Wuyts}, Stijn and {Castellano}, Marco and {Cooray}, Asantha R. and {Dickinson}, Mark E. and {Dunlop}, James S. and {Fazio}, G.~G. and {Gardner}, Jonathan P. and {Gawiser}, Eric and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Hathi}, Nimish P. and {Hsu}, Li-Ting and {Lee}, Kyoung-Soo and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Nandra}, Kirpal and {Newman}, Jeffery A. and {van der Wel}, Arjen},\n title = \"{CANDELS Multi-wavelength Catalogs: Source Detection and Photometry in the GOODS-South Field}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {catalogs, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: photometry, methods: data analysis, techniques: image processing, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2013,\n month = aug,\n volume = {207},\n number = {2},\n eid = {24},\n pages = {24},\n doi = {10.1088/0067-0049/207/2/24},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1308.4405},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..207...24G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Manzoni2025,\n author = {{Manzoni}, Giorgio and {Broadhurst}, Tom and {Lim}, Jeremy and {Liu}, Tao and {Smoot}, George and {Baugh}, Carlton M. and {Tompkins}, Scott and {Windhorst}, Rogier and {Driver}, Simon and {Carleton}, Timothy and {Frye}, Brenda and {Fung}, Leo and {Zhang}, Jiashuo and {Cohen}, Seth H. and {Conselice}, Christopher J. and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Jansen}, Rolf A. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Ortiz}, III, Rafael and {Pirzkal}, Norbert and {Willmer}, Christopher N.~A.},\n title = \"{Explaining JWST Counts with Galaxy Formation Models}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy formation, Galaxy counts, Galaxy evolution, Observational cosmology, James Webb Space Telescope, Astronomical simulations, Hierarchical models, Cosmological models, 595, 588, 594, 1146, 2291, 1857, 1925, 337, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = aug,\n volume = {988},\n number = {2},\n eid = {264},\n pages = {264},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ade700},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2502.04702},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...988..264M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Metcalfe2001,\n author = {{Metcalfe}, N. and {Shanks}, T. and {Campos}, A. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Fong}, R.},\n title = \"{Galaxy number counts - V. Ultradeep counts: the Herschel and Hubble Deep Fields}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: EVOLUTION, GALAXIES: PHOTOMETRY, COSMOLOGY: OBSERVATIONS, Astrophysics},\n year = 2001,\n month = may,\n volume = {323},\n number = {4},\n pages = {795-830},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04168.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0010153},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.323..795M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Gardner1993,\n author = {{Gardner}, J.~P. and {Cowie}, L.~L. and {Wainscoat}, R.~J.},\n title = \"{Galaxy Number Counts from K = 10 to K = 23}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Extremely High Frequencies, Galactic Evolution, Infrared Sources (Astronomy), Color-Magnitude Diagram, Luminosity, Astrophysics, COSMOLOGY: OBSERVATIONS, GALAXIES: EVOLUTION, INFRARED: GALAXIES},\n year = 1993,\n month = sep,\n volume = {415},\n pages = {L9},\n doi = {10.1086/187020},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...415L...9G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Moffat1969,\n author = {{Moffat}, A.~F.~J.},\n title = \"{A Theoretical Investigation of Focal Stellar Images in the Photographic Emulsion and Application to Photographic Photometry}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n year = 1969,\n month = dec,\n volume = {3},\n pages = {455},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969A&A.....3..455M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bouwens2021,\n author = {{Bouwens}, R.~J. and {Oesch}, P.~A. and {Stefanon}, M. and {Illingworth}, G. and {Labb{\\'e}}, I. and {Reddy}, N. and {Atek}, H. and {Montes}, M. and {Naidu}, R. and {Nanayakkara}, T. and {Nelson}, E. and {Wilkins}, S.},\n title = \"{New Determinations of the UV Luminosity Functions from z 9 to 2 Show a Remarkable Consistency with Halo Growth and a Constant Star Formation Efficiency}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Lyman-break galaxies, High-redshift galaxies, Galaxy evolution, Luminosity function, 979, 734, 594, 942, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = aug,\n volume = {162},\n number = {2},\n eid = {47},\n pages = {47},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-3881/abf83e},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2102.07775},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162...47B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{DrlicaWagner2018,\n author = {{Drlica-Wagner}, A. and {Sevilla-Noarbe}, I. and {Rykoff}, E.~S. and {Gruendl}, R.~A. and {Yanny}, B. and {Tucker}, D.~L. and {Hoyle}, B. and {Carnero Rosell}, A. and {Bernstein}, G.~M. and {Bechtol}, K. and {Becker}, M.~R. and {Benoit-L{\\'e}vy}, A. and {Bertin}, E. and {Carrasco Kind}, M. and {Davis}, C. and {de Vicente}, J. and {Diehl}, H.~T. and {Gruen}, D. and {Hartley}, W.~G. and {Leistedt}, B. and {Li}, T.~S. and {Marshall}, J.~L. and {Neilsen}, E. and {Rau}, M.~M. and {Sheldon}, E. and {Smith}, J. and {Troxel}, M.~A. and {Wyatt}, S. and {Zhang}, Y. and {Abbott}, T.~M.~C. and {Abdalla}, F.~B. and {Allam}, S. and {Banerji}, M. and {Brooks}, D. and {Buckley-Geer}, E. and {Burke}, D.~L. and {Capozzi}, D. and {Carretero}, J. and {Cunha}, C.~E. and {D'Andrea}, C.~B. and {da Costa}, L.~N. and {DePoy}, D.~L. and {Desai}, S. and {Dietrich}, J.~P. and {Doel}, P. and {Evrard}, A.~E. and {Fausti Neto}, A. and {Flaugher}, B. and {Fosalba}, P. and {Frieman}, J. and {Garc{\\'\\i}a-Bellido}, J. and {Gerdes}, D.~W. and {Giannantonio}, T. and {Gschwend}, J. and {Gutierrez}, G. and {Honscheid}, K. and {James}, D.~J. and {Jeltema}, T. and {Kuehn}, K. and {Kuhlmann}, S. and {Kuropatkin}, N. and {Lahav}, O. and {Lima}, M. and {Lin}, H. and {Maia}, M.~A.~G. and {Martini}, P. and {McMahon}, R.~G. and {Melchior}, P. and {Menanteau}, F. and {Miquel}, R. and {Nichol}, R.~C. and {Ogando}, R.~L.~C. and {Plazas}, A.~A. and {Romer}, A.~K. and {Roodman}, A. and {Sanchez}, E. and {Scarpine}, V. and {Schindler}, R. and {Schubnell}, M. and {Smith}, M. and {Smith}, R.~C. and {Soares-Santos}, M. and {Sobreira}, F. and {Suchyta}, E. and {Tarle}, G. and {Vikram}, V. and {Walker}, A.~R. and {Wechsler}, R.~H. and {Zuntz}, J. and {DES Collaboration}},\n title = \"{Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Photometric Data Set for Cosmology}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {catalogs, cosmology: observations, surveys, techniques: image processing, techniques: photometric, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = apr,\n volume = {235},\n number = {2},\n eid = {33},\n pages = {33},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f5},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1708.01531},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..235...33D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kron1980,\n author = {{Kron}, R.~G.},\n title = \"{Photometry of a complete sample of faint galaxies.}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Astronomical Photometry, Galactic Radiation, Galaxies, Star Distribution, Calibrating, Colorimetry, Distribution Functions, Galactic Evolution, Luminous Intensity, Tables (Data), Astronomy},\n year = 1980,\n month = jun,\n volume = {43},\n pages = {305-325},\n doi = {10.1086/190669},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ApJS...43..305K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Paris2023,\n author = {{Paris}, Diego and {Merlin}, Emiliano and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Bonchi}, Andrea and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Correnti}, Matteo and {Treu}, Tommaso and {Boyett}, Kristan and {Calabr{\\`o}}, Antonello and {Castellano}, Marco and {Chen}, Wenlei and {Yang}, Lilan and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Kelly}, Patrick and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Leethochawalit}, Nicha and {Mascia}, Sara and {Mason}, Charlotte and {Morishita}, Takahiro and {Nonino}, Mario and {Pentericci}, Laura and {Polenta}, Gianluca and {Roberts-Borsani}, Guido and {Santini}, Paola and {Trenti}, Michele and {Vanzella}, Eros and {Vulcani}, Benedetta and {Windhorst}, Rogier A. and {Nanayakkara}, Themiya and {Wang}, Xin},\n title = \"{The GLASS-JWST Early Release Science Program. II. Stage I Release of NIRCam Imaging and Catalogs in the Abell 2744 Region}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {High-redshift galaxies, Galaxies, 734, 573, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = jul,\n volume = {952},\n number = {1},\n eid = {20},\n pages = {20},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/acda8a},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2301.02179},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...952...20P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Merlin2024,\n author = {{Merlin}, E. and {Santini}, P. and {Paris}, D. and {Castellano}, M. and {Fontana}, A. and {Treu}, T. and {Finkelstein}, S.~L. and {Dunlop}, J.~S. and {Arrabal Haro}, P. and {Bagley}, M. and {Boyett}, K. and {Calabr{\\`o}}, A. and {Correnti}, M. and {Davis}, K. and {Dickinson}, M. and {Donnan}, C.~T. and {Ferguson}, H.~C. and {Fortuni}, F. and {Giavalisco}, M. and {Glazebrook}, K. and {Grazian}, A. and {Grogin}, N.~A. and {Hathi}, N. and {Hirschmann}, M. and {Kartaltepe}, J.~S. and {Kewley}, L.~J. and {Kirkpatrick}, A. and {Kocevski}, D.~D. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Leung}, G. and {Lotz}, J.~M. and {Lucas}, R.~A. and {Magee}, D.~K. and {Marchesini}, D. and {Mascia}, S. and {McLeod}, D.~J. and {McLure}, R.~J. and {Nanayakkara}, T. and {Napolitano}, L. and {Nonino}, M. and {Papovich}, C. and {Pentericci}, L. and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, P.~G. and {Pirzkal}, N. and {Ravindranath}, S. and {Roberts-Borsani}, G. and {Somerville}, R.~S. and {Trenti}, M. and {Trump}, J.~R. and {Vulcani}, B. and {Wang}, X. and {Watson}, P.~J. and {Wilkins}, S.~M. and {Yang}, G. and {Yung}, L.~Y.~A.},\n title = \"{ASTRODEEP-JWST: NIRCam-HST multi-band photometry and redshifts for half a million sources in six extragalactic deep fields}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {methods: data analysis, catalogs, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: photometry, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = nov,\n volume = {691},\n eid = {A240},\n pages = {A240},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202451409},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2409.00169},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...691A.240M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Laigle2016,\n author = {{Laigle}, C. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Hsieh}, B.~C. and {Davidzon}, I. and {Capak}, P. and {Hasinger}, G. and {Silverman}, J.~D. and {Pichon}, C. and {Coupon}, J. and {Aussel}, H. and {Le Borgne}, D. and {Caputi}, K. and {Cassata}, P. and {Chang}, Y. -Y. and {Civano}, F. and {Dunlop}, J. and {Fynbo}, J. and {Kartaltepe}, J.~S. and {Koekemoer}, A. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Le Floc'h}, E. and {Leauthaud}, A. and {Lilly}, S. and {Lin}, L. and {Marchesi}, S. and {Milvang-Jensen}, B. and {Salvato}, M. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Scoville}, N. and {Smolcic}, V. and {Stockmann}, M. and {Taniguchi}, Y. and {Tasca}, L. and {Toft}, S. and {Vaccari}, Mattia and {Zabl}, J.},\n title = \"{The COSMOS2015 Catalog: Exploring the 1 < z < 6 Universe with Half a Million Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {catalogs, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: photometry, methods: observational, techniques: photometric, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = jun,\n volume = {224},\n number = {2},\n eid = {24},\n pages = {24},\n doi = {10.3847/0067-0049/224/2/24},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1604.02350},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..224...24L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Boucaud2016,\n author = {{Boucaud}, A. and {Bocchio}, M. and {Abergel}, A. and {Orieux}, F. and {Dole}, H. and {Hadj-Youcef}, M.~A.},\n title = \"{Convolution kernels for multi-wavelength imaging}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {methods: observational, techniques: image processing, telescopes, techniques: photometric, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = dec,\n volume = {596},\n eid = {A63},\n pages = {A63},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201629080},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1609.02006},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...596A..63B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Finkelstein2023,\n author = {{Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Papovich}, Casey and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron and {Arrabal Haro}, Pablo and {Behroozi}, Peter and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Larson}, Rebecca L. and {Le Bail}, Aur{\\'e}lien and {Morales}, Alexa M. and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Burgarella}, Denis and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Wuyts}, Stijn and {Bromm}, Volker and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Gardner}, Jonathan P. and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Grazian}, Andrea and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Hathi}, Nimish P. and {Hutchison}, Taylor A. and {Jha}, Saurabh W. and {Jogee}, Shardha and {Kewley}, Lisa J. and {Kirkpatrick}, Allison and {Long}, Arianna S. and {Lotz}, Jennifer M. and {Pentericci}, Laura and {Pierel}, Justin D.~R. and {Pirzkal}, Nor and {Ravindranath}, Swara and {Ryan}, Russell E. and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {Yang}, Guang and {Bhatawdekar}, Rachana and {Bisigello}, Laura and {Buat}, V{\\'e}ronique and {Calabr{\\`o}}, Antonello and {Castellano}, Marco and {Cleri}, Nikko J. and {Cooper}, M.~C. and {Croton}, Darren and {Daddi}, Emanuele and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Elbaz}, David and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Gawiser}, Eric and {Holwerda}, Benne W. and {Huertas-Company}, Marc and {Jaskot}, Anne E. and {Leung}, Gene C.~K. and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Pandya}, Viraj and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Weiner}, Benjamin J. and {Zavala}, Jorge A.},\n title = \"{CEERS Key Paper. I. An Early Look into the First 500 Myr of Galaxy Formation with JWST}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Early universe, Galaxy formation, Galaxy evolution, High-redshift galaxies, 435, 595, 594, 734, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = mar,\n volume = {946},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L13},\n pages = {L13},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/acade4},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2211.05792},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...946L..13F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Weaver2024,\n author = {{Weaver}, John R. and {Cutler}, Sam E. and {Pan}, Richard and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Price}, Sedona H. and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Leja}, Joel and {Wang}, Bingjie and {Furtak}, Lukas J. and {Zitrin}, Adi and {Atek}, Hakim and {Chemerynska}, Iryna and {Coe}, Dan and {Dayal}, Pratika and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Feldmann}, Robert and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, Natascha M. and {Franx}, Marijn and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Fudamoto}, Yoshinobu and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {de Graaff}, Anna and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Juneau}, St{\\'e}phanie and {Kassin}, Susan and {Kriek}, Mariska and {Khullar}, Gourav and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {Mowla}, Lamiya A. and {Muzzin}, Adam and {Nanayakkara}, Themiya and {Nelson}, Erica J. and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Pacifici}, Camilla and {Papovich}, Casey and {Setton}, David J. and {Shapley}, Alice E. and {Shipley}, Heath V. and {Smit}, Renske and {Stefanon}, Mauro and {Taylor}, Edward N. and {Weibel}, Andrea and {Williams}, Christina C.},\n title = \"{The UNCOVER Survey: A First-look HST + JWST Catalog of 60,000 Galaxies near A2744 and beyond}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Catalogs, Abell clusters, Photometry, James Webb Space Telescope, Hubble Space Telescope, Astronomical methods, 205, 9, 1234, 2291, 761, 1043, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jan,\n volume = {270},\n number = {1},\n eid = {7},\n pages = {7},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4365/ad07e0},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2301.02671},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJS..270....7W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Berman2024,\n author = {{Berman}, Edward M. and {McCleary}, Jacqueline E. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Nightingale}, James W. and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Scognamiglio}, Diana and {Massey}, Richard and {Mahler}, Guillaume and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Cosmos-Web: The Jwst Cosmic Origins Survey}},\n title = \"{Efficient Point-spread Function Modeling with ShOpt.jl: A Point-spread Function Benchmarking Study with JWST NIRCam Imaging}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Computational methods, Astronomy image processing, Astronomy data analysis, James Webb Space Telescope, 1965, 2306, 1858, 2291, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = oct,\n volume = {168},\n number = {4},\n eid = {174},\n pages = {174},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-3881/ad6a0f},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2401.11625},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....168..174B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@INPROCEEDINGS{Bertin2011,\n author = {{Bertin}, E.},\n title = \"{Automated Morphometry with SExtractor and PSFEx}\",\n booktitle = {Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XX},\n year = 2011,\n editor = {{Evans}, I.~N. and {Accomazzi}, A. and {Mink}, D.~J. and {Rots}, A.~H.},\n series = {Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series},\n volume = {442},\n month = jul,\n pages = {435},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ASPC..442..435B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Zalesky2025,\n author = {{Euclid Collaboration: Zalesky}, L. and {McPartland}, C.~J.~R. and {Weaver}, J.~R. and {Toft}, S. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Suzuki}, N. and {Szapudi}, I. and {Valdes}, I. and {Murphree}, G. and {Chartab}, N. and {Allen}, N. and {Taamoli}, S. and {Barrow}, S.~W.~J. and {Ch{\\'a}vez Ortiz}, O. and {Finkelstein}, S.~L. and {Gwyn}, S. and {Sawicki}, M. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Stern}, D. and {Dannerbauer}, H. and {Altieri}, B. and {Andreon}, S. and {Auricchio}, N. and {Baccigalupi}, C. and {Baldi}, M. and {Bardelli}, S. and {Bender}, R. and {Bodendorf}, C. and {Bonino}, D. and {Branchini}, E. and {Brescia}, M. and {Brinchmann}, J. and {Camera}, S. and {Capobianco}, V. and {Carbone}, C. and {Carretero}, J. and {Casas}, S. and {Castander}, F.~J. and {Castellano}, M. and {Castignani}, G. and {Cavuoti}, S. and {Cimatti}, A. and {Colodro-Conde}, C. and {Congedo}, G. and {Conselice}, C.~J. and {Conversi}, L. and {Copin}, Y. and {Corcione}, L. and {Courbin}, F. and {Courtois}, H.~M. and {Da Silva}, A. and {Degaudenzi}, H. and {De Lucia}, G. and {Di Giorgio}, A.~M. and {Dinis}, J. and {Dubath}, F. and {Duncan}, C.~A.~J. and {Dupac}, X. and {Dusini}, S. and {Farina}, M. and {Farrens}, S. and {Ferriol}, S. and {Fotopoulou}, S. and {Frailis}, M. and {Franceschi}, E. and {Galeotta}, S. and {Garilli}, B. and {Gillard}, W. and {Gillis}, B. and {Giocoli}, C. and {G{\\'o}mez-Alvarez}, P. and {Grazian}, A. and {Grupp}, F. and {Haugan}, S.~V.~H. and {Hoekstra}, H. and {Holmes}, W. and {Hook}, I. and {Hormuth}, F. and {Hornstrup}, A. and {Hudelot}, P. and {Jahnke}, K. and {Joachimi}, B. and {Keih{\\\"a}nen}, E. and {Kermiche}, S. and {Kiessling}, A. and {Kilbinger}, M. and {Kubik}, B. and {Kuijken}, K. and {K{\\\"u}mmel}, M. and {Kunz}, M. and {Kurki-Suonio}, H. and {Laureijs}, R. and {Ligori}, S. and {Lilje}, P.~B. and {Lindholm}, V. and {Lloro}, I. and {Mainetti}, G. and {Maino}, D. and {Maiorano}, E. and {Mansutti}, O. and {Marggraf}, O. and {Markovic}, K. and {Martinelli}, M. and {Martinet}, N. and {Marulli}, F. and {Massey}, R. and {Maurogordato}, S. and {Mei}, S. and {Mellier}, Y. and {Meneghetti}, M. and {Merlin}, E. and {Meylan}, G. and {Moresco}, M. and {Moscardini}, L. and {Munari}, E. and {Neissner}, C. and {Niemi}, S. -M. and {Nightingale}, J.~W. and {Padilla}, C. and {Paltani}, S. and {Pasian}, F. and {Pedersen}, K. and {Percival}, W.~J. and {Pettorino}, V. and {Pires}, S. and {Polenta}, G. and {Poncet}, M. and {Popa}, L.~A. and {Pozzetti}, L. and {Raison}, F. and {Rebolo}, R. and {Renzi}, A. and {Rhodes}, J. and {Riccio}, G. and {Romelli}, E. and {Roncarelli}, M. and {Rossetti}, E. and {Saglia}, R. and {Sakr}, Z. and {Sapone}, D. and {Scaramella}, R. and {Schirmer}, M. and {Schneider}, P. and {Schrabback}, T. and {Secroun}, A. and {Sefusatti}, E. and {Seidel}, G. and {Serrano}, S. and {Sirignano}, C. and {Sirri}, G. and {Stanco}, L. and {Steinwagner}, J. and {Tallada-Cresp{\\'\\i}}, P. and {Teplitz}, H.~I. and {Tereno}, I. and {Toledo-Moreo}, R. and {Torradeflot}, F. and {Tutusaus}, I. and {Valentijn}, E.~A. and {Valenziano}, L. and {Vassallo}, T. and {Verdoes Kleijn}, G. and {Veropalumbo}, A. and {Wang}, Y. and {Weller}, J. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Zucca}, E. and {Bolzonella}, M. and {Boucaud}, A. and {Bozzo}, E. and {Burigana}, C. and {Di Ferdinando}, D. and {Vigo}, J.~A. Escartin and {Farinelli}, R. and {Gracia-Carpio}, J. and {Mauri}, N. and {Nucita}, A.~A. and {Scottez}, V. and {Tenti}, M. and {Viel}, M. and {Wiesmann}, M. and {Akrami}, Y. and {Allevato}, V. and {Anselmi}, S. and {Ballardini}, M. and {Bethermin}, M. and {Blanchard}, A. and {Blot}, L. and {Borgani}, S. and {Bruton}, S. and {Cabanac}, R. and {Calabro}, A. and {Cappi}, A. and {Carvalho}, C.~S. and {Castro}, T. and {Chambers}, K.~C. and {Chary}, R. and {Contarini}, S.},\n title = \"{Euclid preparation: LXI. Cosmic Dawn Survey: 'Pre-launch' multiwavelength catalogues for Euclid Deep Field North and Euclid Deep Field Fornax}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {editorials, notices, miscellaneous, catalogs, surveys, galaxies: general, Astrophysics of Galaxies, Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = mar,\n volume = {695},\n eid = {A229},\n pages = {A229},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202451857},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2408.05296},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...695A.229E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bellagamba2018,\n author = {{Bellagamba}, Fabio and {Roncarelli}, Mauro and {Maturi}, Matteo and {Moscardini}, Lauro},\n title = \"{AMICO: optimized detection of galaxy clusters in photometric surveys}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: data analysis, galaxies: clusters: general, large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: observations, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = feb,\n volume = {473},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5221-5236},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx2701},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1705.03029},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.5221B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Maturi2019,\n author = {{Maturi}, Matteo and {Bellagamba}, Fabio and {Radovich}, Mario and {Roncarelli}, Mauro and {Sereno}, Mauro and {Moscardini}, Lauro and {Bardelli}, Sandro and {Puddu}, Emanuella},\n title = \"{AMICO galaxy clusters in KiDS-DR3: sample properties and selection function}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: clusters: general, cosmology: observations, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2019,\n month = may,\n volume = {485},\n number = {1},\n pages = {498-512},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz294},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1810.02811},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485..498M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Toni2024,\n author = {{Toni}, G. and {Maturi}, M. and {Finoguenov}, A. and {Moscardini}, L. and {Castignani}, G.},\n title = \"{AMICO-COSMOS galaxy cluster and group catalogue up to z = 2: Sample properties and X-ray counterparts}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: groups: general, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jul,\n volume = {687},\n eid = {A56},\n pages = {A56},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202348832},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2312.12501},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...687A..56T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ding2020,\n author = {{Ding}, Xuheng and {Silverman}, John and {Treu}, Tommaso and {Schulze}, Andreas and {Schramm}, Malte and {Birrer}, Simon and {Park}, Daeseong and {Jahnke}, Knud and {Bennert}, Vardha N. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Malkan}, Matthew A. and {Sanders}, David},\n title = \"{The Mass Relations between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host Galaxies at 1 < z < 2 HST-WFC3}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Active galaxies, 594, 17, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = jan,\n volume = {888},\n number = {1},\n eid = {37},\n pages = {37},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab5b90},\n archivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1910.11875},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...888...37D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Walmsley2022,\n author = {{Walmsley}, Mike and {Lintott}, Chris and {G{\\'e}ron}, Tobias and {Kruk}, Sandor and {Krawczyk}, Coleman and {Willett}, Kyle W. and {Bamford}, Steven and {Kelvin}, Lee S. and {Fortson}, Lucy and {Gal}, Yarin and {Keel}, William and {Masters}, Karen L. and {Mehta}, Vihang and {Simmons}, Brooke D. and {Smethurst}, Rebecca and {Smith}, Lewis and {Baeten}, Elisabeth M. and {Macmillan}, Christine},\n title = \"{Galaxy Zoo DECaLS: Detailed visual morphology measurements from volunteers and deep learning for 314 000 galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: data analysis, galaxies: bar, galaxies: general, galaxies: interactions, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n year = 2022,\n month = jan,\n volume = {509},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3966-3988},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stab2093},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2102.08414},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.509.3966W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{DominiguezSanchez2018,\n author = {{Dom{\\'\\i}nguez S{\\'a}nchez}, H. and {Huertas-Company}, M. and {Bernardi}, M. and {Tuccillo}, D. and {Fischer}, J.~L.},\n title = \"{Improving galaxy morphologies for SDSS with Deep Learning}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: observational, catalogues, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = feb,\n volume = {476},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3661-3676},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty338},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1711.05744},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.3661D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ciprijanovic2022,\n author = {{{\\'C}iprijanovi{\\'c}}, Aleksandra and {Lewis}, Ashia and {Pedro}, Kevin and {Madireddy}, Sandeep and {Nord}, Brian and {Perdue}, Gabriel N. and {Wild}, Stefan M.},\n title = \"{Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation for Cross-Survey Galaxy Morphology Classification and Anomaly Detection}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Science - Machine Learning},\n year = 2022,\n month = nov,\n eid = {arXiv:2211.00677},\n pages = {arXiv:2211.00677},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2211.00677},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2211.00677},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv221100677C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Shen2024,\n author = {{Shen}, Lu and {Papovich}, Casey and {Matharu}, Jasleen and {Pirzkal}, Nor and {Hu}, Weida and {Backhaus}, Bren E. and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Cheng}, Yingjie and {Cleri}, Nikko J. and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Huertas-Company}, Marc and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Jung}, Intae and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Lotz}, Jennifer M. and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Rothberg}, Barry and {Simons}, Raymond C. and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron},\n title = \"{NGDEEP Epoch 1: Spatially Resolved H{\\ensuremath{\\alpha}} Observations of Disk and Bulge Growth in Star-forming Galaxies at z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 0.6{\\textendash}2.2 from JWST NIRISS Slitless Spectroscopy}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {High-redshift galaxies, Star formation, Galaxy stellar content, Galaxy evolution, 734, 1569, 621, 594, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = mar,\n volume = {963},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L49},\n pages = {L49},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ad28bd},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2310.13745},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...963L..49S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{ArangoToro2023,\n author = {{Arango-Toro}, R.~C. and {Ciesla}, L. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Magnelli}, B. and {Jim{\\'e}nez-Andrade}, E.~F. and {Buat}, V.},\n title = \"{Probing the timescale of the 1.4 GHz radio emissions as a star formation tracer}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: ISM, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = jul,\n volume = {675},\n eid = {A126},\n pages = {A126},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202345848},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2304.13758},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...675A.126A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tacchella2022b,\n author = {{Tacchella}, Sandro and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Bagley}, Micaela and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Graziani}, Luca and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Hathi}, Nimish and {Hutchison}, Taylor A. and {Jung}, Intae and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Larson}, Rebecca L. and {Papovich}, Casey and {Pirzkal}, Norbert and {Rojas-Ruiz}, Sof{\\'\\i}a and {Song}, Mimi and {Schneider}, Raffaella and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron},\n title = \"{On the Stellar Populations of Galaxies at z = 9-11: The Growth of Metals and Stellar Mass at Early Times}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Early universe, Galaxy formation, Galaxy evolution, High-redshift galaxies, Star formation, 435, 595, 594, 734, 1569, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = mar,\n volume = {927},\n number = {2},\n eid = {170},\n pages = {170},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac4cad},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2111.05351},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...927..170T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Leja2019a,\n author = {{Leja}, Joel and {Carnall}, Adam C. and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Conroy}, Charlie and {Speagle}, Joshua S.},\n title = \"{How to Measure Galaxy Star Formation Histories. II. Nonparametric Models}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = may,\n volume = {876},\n number = {1},\n eid = {3},\n pages = {3},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab133c},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1811.03637},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876....3L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Leja2019b,\n author = {{Leja}, Joel and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Conroy}, Charlie and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Speagle}, Joshua S. and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Momcheva}, Ivelina and {Skelton}, Rosalind and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Franx}, Marijn and {Nelson}, Erica J.},\n title = \"{An Older, More Quiescent Universe from Panchromatic SED Fitting of the 3D-HST Survey}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = jun,\n volume = {877},\n number = {2},\n eid = {140},\n pages = {140},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab1d5a},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1812.05608},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...877..140L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@software{Bushouse2023,\n author = {Bushouse, Howard and Eisenhamer, Jonathan and Dencheva, Nadia and Davies, James and Greenfield, Perry and Morrison, Jane and Hodge, Phil and Simon, Bernie and Grumm, David and Droettboom, Michael and Slavich, Edward and Sosey, Megan and Pauly, Tyler and Miller, Todd and Jedrzejewski, Robert and Hack, Warren and Davis, David and Crawford, Steven and Law, David and Gordon, Karl and Regan, Michael and Cara, Mihai and MacDonald, Ken and Bradley, Larry and Shanahan, Clare and Jamieson, William and Teodoro, Mairan and Williams, Thomas and Pena-Guerrero, Maria},\n title = {{JWST Calibration Pipeline}},\n version = {1.13.1},\n doi = {10.5281/zenodo.7038885},\n year = {2023},\n month = dec,\n day = {19},\n url = {https://github.com/spacetelescope/jwst}\n}\n@ARTICLE{GaiaCollab2023,\n author = {{Gaia Collaboration} and {Vallenari}, A. and {Brown}, A.~G.~A. and {Prusti}, T. and {de Bruijne}, J.~H.~J. and {Arenou}, F. and {Babusiaux}, C. and {Biermann}, M. and {Creevey}, O.~L. and {Ducourant}, C. and {Evans}, D.~W. and {Eyer}, L. and {Guerra}, R. and {Hutton}, A. and {Jordi}, C. and {Klioner}, S.~A. and {Lammers}, U.~L. and {Lindegren}, L. and {Luri}, X. and {Mignard}, F. and {Panem}, C. and {Pourbaix}, D. and {Randich}, S. and {Sartoretti}, P. and {Soubiran}, C. and {Tanga}, P. and {Walton}, N.~A. and {Bailer-Jones}, C.~A.~L. and {Bastian}, U. and {Drimmel}, R. and {Jansen}, F. and {Katz}, D. and {Lattanzi}, M.~G. and {van Leeuwen}, F. and {Bakker}, J. and {Cacciari}, C. and {Casta{\\~n}eda}, J. and {De Angeli}, F. and {Fabricius}, C. and {Fouesneau}, M. and {Fr{\\'e}mat}, Y. and {Galluccio}, L. and {Guerrier}, A. and {Heiter}, U. and {Masana}, E. and {Messineo}, R. and {Mowlavi}, N. and {Nicolas}, C. and {Nienartowicz}, K. and {Pailler}, F. and {Panuzzo}, P. and {Riclet}, F. and {Roux}, W. and {Seabroke}, G.~M. and {Sordo}, R. and {Th{\\'e}venin}, F. and {Gracia-Abril}, G. and {Portell}, J. and {Teyssier}, D. and {Altmann}, M. and {Andrae}, R. and {Audard}, M. and {Bellas-Velidis}, I. and {Benson}, K. and {Berthier}, J. and {Blomme}, R. and {Burgess}, P.~W. and {Busonero}, D. and {Busso}, G. and {C{\\'a}novas}, H. and {Carry}, B. and {Cellino}, A. and {Cheek}, N. and {Clementini}, G. and {Damerdji}, Y. and {Davidson}, M. and {de Teodoro}, P. and {Nu{\\~n}ez Campos}, M. and {Delchambre}, L. and {Dell'Oro}, A. and {Esquej}, P. and {Fern{\\'a}ndez-Hern{\\'a}ndez}, J. and {Fraile}, E. and {Garabato}, D. and {Garc{\\'\\i}a-Lario}, P. and {Gosset}, E. and {Haigron}, R. and {Halbwachs}, J. -L. and {Hambly}, N.~C. and {Harrison}, D.~L. and {Hern{\\'a}ndez}, J. and {Hestroffer}, D. and {Hodgkin}, S.~T. and {Holl}, B. and {Jan{\\ss}en}, K. and {Jevardat de Fombelle}, G. and {Jordan}, S. and {Krone-Martins}, A. and {Lanzafame}, A.~C. and {L{\\\"o}ffler}, W. and {Marchal}, O. and {Marrese}, P.~M. and {Moitinho}, A. and {Muinonen}, K. and {Osborne}, P. and {Pancino}, E. and {Pauwels}, T. and {Recio-Blanco}, A. and {Reyl{\\'e}}, C. and {Riello}, M. and {Rimoldini}, L. and {Roegiers}, T. and {Rybizki}, J. and {Sarro}, L.~M. and {Siopis}, C. and {Smith}, M. and {Sozzetti}, A. and {Utrilla}, E. and {van Leeuwen}, M. and {Abbas}, U. and {{\\'A}brah{\\'a}m}, P. and {Abreu Aramburu}, A. and {Aerts}, C. and {Aguado}, J.~J. and {Ajaj}, M. and {Aldea-Montero}, F. and {Altavilla}, G. and {{\\'A}lvarez}, M.~A. and {Alves}, J. and {Anders}, F. and {Anderson}, R.~I. and {Anglada Varela}, E. and {Antoja}, T. and {Baines}, D. and {Baker}, S.~G. and {Balaguer-N{\\'u}{\\~n}ez}, L. and {Balbinot}, E. and {Balog}, Z. and {Barache}, C. and {Barbato}, D. and {Barros}, M. and {Barstow}, M.~A. and {Bartolom{\\'e}}, S. and {Bassilana}, J. -L. and {Bauchet}, N. and {Becciani}, U. and {Bellazzini}, M. and {Berihuete}, A. and {Bernet}, M. and {Bertone}, S. and {Bianchi}, L. and {Binnenfeld}, A. and {Blanco-Cuaresma}, S. and {Blazere}, A. and {Boch}, T. and {Bombrun}, A. and {Bossini}, D. and {Bouquillon}, S. and {Bragaglia}, A. and {Bramante}, L. and {Breedt}, E. and {Bressan}, A. and {Brouillet}, N. and {Brugaletta}, E. and {Bucciarelli}, B. and {Burlacu}, A. and {Butkevich}, A.~G. and {Buzzi}, R. and {Caffau}, E. and {Cancelliere}, R. and {Cantat-Gaudin}, T. and {Carballo}, R. and {Carlucci}, T. and {Carnerero}, M.~I. and {Carrasco}, J.~M. and {Casamiquela}, L. and {Castellani}, M. and {Castro-Ginard}, A. and {Chaoul}, L. and {Charlot}, P. and {Chemin}, L. and {Chiaramida}, V. and {Chiavassa}, A. and {Chornay}, N. and {Comoretto}, G. and {Contursi}, G. and {Cooper}, W.~J. and {Cornez}, T. and {Cowell}, S. and {Crifo}, F. and {Cropper}, M. and {Crosta}, M. and {Crowley}, C. and {Dafonte}, C. and {Dapergolas}, A. and {David}, M. and {David}, P. and {de Laverny}, P. and {De Luise}, F. and {De March}, R.},\n title = \"{Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {techniques: photometric, techniques: spectroscopic, techniques: radial velocities, catalogs, astrometry, parallaxes, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = jun,\n volume = {674},\n eid = {A1},\n pages = {A1},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202243940},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2208.00211},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A...1G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{weaver_cosmos2020_2022,\n author = {{Weaver}, J.~R. and {Kauffmann}, O.~B. and {Ilbert}, O. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Moneti}, A. and {Toft}, S. and {Brammer}, G. and {Shuntov}, M. and {Davidzon}, I. and {Hsieh}, B.~C. and {Laigle}, C. and {Anastasiou}, A. and {Jespersen}, C.~K. and {Vinther}, J. and {Capak}, P. and {Casey}, C.~M. and {McPartland}, C.~J.~R. and {Milvang-Jensen}, B. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Zalesky}, L. and {Arnouts}, S. and {Aussel}, H. and {Dunlop}, J.~S. and {Faisst}, A. and {Franx}, M. and {Furtak}, L.~J. and {Fynbo}, J.~P.~U. and {Gould}, K.~M.~L. and {Greve}, T.~R. and {Gwyn}, S. and {Kartaltepe}, J.~S. and {Kashino}, D. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Kokorev}, V. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Lilly}, S. and {Masters}, D. and {Magdis}, G. and {Mehta}, V. and {Peng}, Y. and {Riechers}, D.~A. and {Salvato}, M. and {Sawicki}, M. and {Scarlata}, C. and {Scoville}, N. and {Shirley}, R. and {Silverman}, J.~D. and {Sneppen}, A. and {Smolc̆i{\\'c}}, V. and {Steinhardt}, C. and {Stern}, D. and {Tanaka}, M. and {Taniguchi}, Y. and {Teplitz}, H.~I. and {Vaccari}, M. and {Wang}, W. -H. and {Zamorani}, G.},\n title = \"{COSMOS2020: A Panchromatic View of the Universe to z 10 from Two Complementary Catalogs}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {205, 1671, 594, 734, 1234, 1145, 1043, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2022,\n month = jan,\n volume = {258},\n number = {1},\n eid = {11},\n pages = {11},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4365/ac3078},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2110.13923},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..258...11W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Bertin_SE,\n author = {{Bertin}, E. and {Arnouts}, S.},\n title = \"{SExtractor: Software for source extraction.}\",\n journal = {\\aaps},\n keywords = {METHODS: DATA ANALYSIS, TECHNIQUES: IMAGE PROCESSING, GALAXIES: PHOTOMETRY},\n year = \"1996\",\n month = jun,\n volume = {117},\n pages = {393-404},\n doi = {10.1051/aas:1996164},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&AS..117..393B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{Bertin_swarp,\n author = {{Bertin}, Emmanuel and {Mellier}, Yannick and {Radovich}, Mario and {Missonnier}, Gilles and {Didelon}, Pierre and {Morin}, Bertrand},\n title = \"{The TERAPIX Pipeline}\",\n keywords = {astronomy: optical, astronomy: software, pipelines: data reduction, software: package, software: development, software: data analysis, data analysis, databases, distributed processing},\n booktitle = {Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XI},\n year = 2002,\n editor = {{Bohlender}, David A. and {Durand}, Daniel and {Handley}, Thomas H.},\n series = {Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series},\n volume = {281},\n month = jan,\n pages = {228},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ASPC..281..228B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Szalay1999,\n author = {{Szalay}, Alexander S. and {Connolly}, Andrew J. and {Szokoly}, Gyula P.},\n title = \"{Simultaneous Multicolor Detection of Faint Galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {COSMOLOGY: OBSERVATIONS, GALAXIES: FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETERS, GALAXIES: PHOTOMETRY, TECHNIQUES: PHOTOMETRIC, Astrophysics},\n year = 1999,\n month = jan,\n volume = {117},\n number = {1},\n pages = {68-74},\n doi = {10.1086/300689},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9811086},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999AJ....117...68S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@article{Barbary2016, \n author = {Kyle Barbary}, \n title = {SEP: Source Extractor as a library}, \n journal = {Journal of Open Source Software},\n doi = {10.21105/joss.00058}, \n url = {https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00058}, \n year = {2016}, \n publisher = {The Open Journal}, \n volume = {1}, \n number = {6}, \n pages = {58}\n}\n\n%---------------------------------- LePhare and CIGALE ----------------------------------\n\n@ARTICLE{Saito20,\n author = {{Saito}, Shun and {de la Torre}, Sylvain and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Dubois}, C{\\'e}dric and {Yabe}, Kiyoto and {Coupon}, Jean},\n title = \"{The synthetic Emission Line COSMOS catalogue: H{\\ensuremath{\\alpha}} and [O II] galaxy luminosity functions and counts at 0.3 < z < 2.5}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {surveys, galaxies: luminosity function, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = may,\n volume = {494},\n number = {1},\n pages = {199-217},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa727},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2003.06394},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494..199S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Madau95,\n author = {{Madau}, Piero},\n title = \"{Radiative Transfer in a Clumpy Universe: The Colors of High-Redshift Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Color, Cosmology, Galactic Evolution, Lyman Spectra, Radiative Transfer, Red Shift, Universe, Absorption Spectra, Background Radiation, Resonance Scattering, Stochastic Processes, Ultraviolet Astronomy, Astrophysics, COSMOLOGY: OBSERVATIONS, GALAXIES: EVOLUTION, GALAXIES: INTERGALACTIC MEDIUM, GALAXIES: QUASARS: ABSORPTION LINES, RADIATIVE TRANSFER, ULTRAVIOLET: GALAXIES},\n year = 1995,\n month = mar,\n volume = {441},\n pages = {18},\n doi = {10.1086/175332},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...441...18M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Ilbert06_LP,\n author = {{Ilbert}, O. and {Arnouts}, S. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Bolzonella}, M. and {Bertin}, E. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Mellier}, Y. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Pell{\\`o}}, R. and {Iovino}, A. and {Tresse}, L. and {Le Brun}, V. and {Bottini}, D. and {Garilli}, B. and {Maccagni}, D. and {Picat}, J.~P. and {Scaramella}, R. and {Scodeggio}, M. and {Vettolani}, G. and {Zanichelli}, A. and {Adami}, C. and {Bardelli}, S. and {Cappi}, A. and {Charlot}, S. and {Ciliegi}, P. and {Contini}, T. and {Cucciati}, O. and {Foucaud}, S. and {Franzetti}, P. and {Gavignaud}, I. and {Guzzo}, L. and {Marano}, B. and {Marinoni}, C. and {Mazure}, A. and {Meneux}, B. and {Merighi}, R. and {Paltani}, S. and {Pollo}, A. and {Pozzetti}, L. and {Radovich}, M. and {Zucca}, E. and {Bondi}, M. and {Bongiorno}, A. and {Busarello}, G. and {de La Torre}, S. and {Gregorini}, L. and {Lamareille}, F. and {Mathez}, G. and {Merluzzi}, P. and {Ripepi}, V. and {Rizzo}, D. and {Vergani}, D.},\n title = \"{Accurate photometric redshifts for the CFHT legacy survey calibrated using the VIMOS VLT deep survey}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: distances and redshifts, galaxies: photometry, methods: data analysis, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = oct,\n volume = {457},\n number = {3},\n pages = {841-856},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20065138},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0603217},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...457..841I},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Arnouts02_LP,\n author = {{Arnouts}, S. and {Moscardini}, L. and {Vanzella}, E. and {Colombi}, S. and {Cristiani}, S. and {Fontana}, A. and {Giallongo}, E. and {Matarrese}, S. and {Saracco}, P.},\n title = \"{Measuring the redshift evolution of clustering: the Hubble Deep Field South}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: EVOLUTION, GALAXIES: HALOES, GALAXIES: FORMATION, COSMOLOGY: OBSERVATIONS, LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSE, Astrophysics},\n year = 2002,\n month = jan,\n volume = {329},\n number = {2},\n pages = {355-366},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.04988.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0109453},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.329..355A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Dale14,\n author = {{Dale}, Daniel A. and {Helou}, George and {Magdis}, Georgios E. and {Armus}, Lee and {D{\\'\\i}az-Santos}, Tanio and {Shi}, Yong},\n title = \"{A Two-parameter Model for the Infrared/Submillimeter/Radio Spectral Energy Distributions of Galaxies and Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dust, extinction, galaxies: active, galaxies: star formation, infrared: ISM, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = mar,\n volume = {784},\n number = {1},\n eid = {83},\n pages = {83},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/83},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1402.1495},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...784...83D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Stalveski16,\n author = {{Stalevski}, Marko and {Ricci}, Claudio and {Ueda}, Yoshihiro and {Lira}, Paulina and {Fritz}, Jacopo and {Baes}, Maarten},\n title = \"{The dust covering factor in active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {radiative transfer, galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = may,\n volume = {458},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2288-2302},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw444},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1602.06954},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.2288S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Calzetti2000,\n author = {{Calzetti}, Daniela and {Armus}, Lee and {Bohlin}, Ralph C. and {Kinney}, Anne L. and {Koornneef}, Jan and {Storchi-Bergmann}, Thaisa},\n title = \"{The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: STARBURST, INFRARED: GALAXIES, INFRARED: ISM: CONTINUUM, ISM: DUST, EXTINCTION, Astrophysics},\n year = 2000,\n month = apr,\n volume = {533},\n number = {2},\n pages = {682-695},\n doi = {10.1086/308692},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9911459},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...533..682C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{BruzualCharlot03,\n author = {{Bruzual}, G. and {Charlot}, S.},\n title = \"{Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {stars: evolution, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = oct,\n volume = {344},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1000-1028},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0309134},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.344.1000B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Ciesla2023,\n author = {{Ciesla}, L. and {G{\\'o}mez-Guijarro}, C. and {Buat}, V. and {Elbaz}, D. and {Jin}, S. and {B{\\'e}thermin}, M. and {Daddi}, E. and {Franco}, M. and {Inami}, H. and {Magdis}, G. and {Magnelli}, B. and {Xiao}, M.},\n title = \"{GOODS-ALMA 2.0: Last gigayear star formation histories of the so-called starbursts within the main sequence}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: fundamental parameters, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = apr,\n volume = {672},\n eid = {A191},\n pages = {A191},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202245376},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2211.02510},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...672A.191C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Boquien19_CIGALE,\n author = {{Boquien}, M. and {Burgarella}, D. and {Roehlly}, Y. and {Buat}, V. and {Ciesla}, L. and {Corre}, D. and {Inoue}, A.~K. and {Salas}, H.},\n title = \"{CIGALE: a python Code Investigating GALaxy Emission}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {methods: data analysis, methods: numerical, methods: statistical, galaxies: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2019,\n month = feb,\n volume = {622},\n eid = {A103},\n pages = {A103},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201834156},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1811.03094},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A.103B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{ArangoToro2024,\n author = {{Arango-Toro}, R.~C. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Ciesla}, L. and {Shuntov}, M. and {Aufort}, G. and {Mercier}, W. and {Laigle}, C. and {Franco}, M. and {Bethermin}, M. and {Le Borgne}, D. and {Dubois}, Y. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Paquereau}, L. and {Huertas-Company}, M. and {Kartaltepe}, J. and {Casey}, C.~M. and {Akins}, H. and {Allen}, N. and {Andika}, I. and {Brinch}, M. and {Drakos}, N.~E. and {Faisst}, A. and {Gozaliasl}, G. and {Harish}, S. and {Kaminsky}, A. and {Koekemoer}, A. and {Kokorev}, V. and {Liu}, D. and {Magdis}, G. and {Martin}, C.~L. and {Moutard}, T. and {Rhodes}, J. and {Rich}, R.~M. and {Robertson}, B. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Sheth}, K. and {Talia}, M. and {Toft}, S. and {Tresse}, L. and {Valentino}, F. and {Vijayan}, A. and {Weaver}, J.},\n title = \"{COSMOS-Web: A history of galaxy migrations over the stellar mass{\\textendash}star formation rate plane}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = apr,\n volume = {696},\n eid = {A159},\n pages = {A159},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202452519},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2410.05375},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...696A.159A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Prevot1984,\n author = {{Prevot}, M.~L. and {Lequeux}, J. and {Maurice}, E. and {Prevot}, L. and {Rocca-Volmerange}, B.},\n title = \"{The typical interstellar extinction in the Small Magellanic Cloud.}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {Interstellar Extinction, Magellanic Clouds, Ultraviolet Spectra, Interstellar Matter, Iue, Astrophysics},\n year = 1984,\n month = mar,\n volume = {132},\n pages = {389-392},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984A&A...132..389P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Schaerer&deBarros09,\n author = {{Schaerer}, D. and {de Barros}, S.},\n title = \"{The impact of nebular emission on the ages of z{\\ensuremath{\\approx}} 6 galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: starburst, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = aug,\n volume = {502},\n number = {2},\n pages = {423-426},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/200911781},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0905.0866},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...502..423S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Salim2018,\n author = {{Salim}, Samir and {Boquien}, M{\\'e}d{\\'e}ric and {Lee}, Janice C.},\n title = \"{Dust Attenuation Curves in the Local Universe: Demographics and New Laws for Star-forming Galaxies and High-redshift Analogs}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dust, extinction, galaxies: fundamental parameters, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = may,\n volume = {859},\n number = {1},\n eid = {11},\n pages = {11},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aabf3c},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1804.05850},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859...11S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n%----------------------------------------------- Halos ----------------------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{Marinoni&Hudson2002,\n author = {{Marinoni}, Christian and {Hudson}, Michael J.},\n title = \"{The Mass-to-Light Function of Virialized Systems and the Relationship between Their Optical and X-Ray Properties}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Dark Matter, Galaxies: Clusters: General, Galaxies: Halos, Galaxies: Luminosity Function, Mass Function, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, X-Rays: General, Astrophysics},\n year = 2002,\n month = apr,\n volume = {569},\n number = {1},\n pages = {101-111},\n doi = {10.1086/339319},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0109134},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...569..101M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wechsler2002,\n author = {{Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Bullock}, James S. and {Primack}, Joel R. and {Kravtsov}, Andrey V. and {Dekel}, Avishai},\n title = \"{Concentrations of Dark Halos from Their Assembly Histories}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Cosmology: Dark Matter, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Formation, Galaxies: Halos, Galaxies: Structure, Astrophysics},\n year = 2002,\n month = mar,\n volume = {568},\n number = {1},\n pages = {52-70},\n doi = {10.1086/338765},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0108151},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...568...52W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{McBride2009,\n author = {{McBride}, James and {Fakhouri}, Onsi and {Ma}, Chung-Pei},\n title = \"{Mass accretion rates and histories of dark matter haloes}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, cosmology: theory, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = oct,\n volume = {398},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1858-1868},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15329.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0902.3659},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.398.1858M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wang2020,\n author = {{Wang}, Kuan and {Mao}, Yao-Yuan and {Zentner}, Andrew R. and {Lange}, Johannes U. and {van den Bosch}, Frank C. and {Wechsler}, Risa H.},\n title = \"{Concentrations of dark haloes emerge from their merger histories}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, dark matter, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2020,\n month = nov,\n volume = {498},\n number = {3},\n pages = {4450-4464},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa2733},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2004.13732},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498.4450W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Reed2003,\n author = {{Reed}, Darren and {Gardner}, Jeffrey and {Quinn}, Thomas and {Stadel}, Joachim and {Fardal}, Mark and {Lake}, George and {Governato}, Fabio},\n title = \"{Evolution of the mass function of dark matter haloes}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, dark matter, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = dec,\n volume = {346},\n number = {2},\n pages = {565-572},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07113.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0301270},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.346..565R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Spergel2003,\n author = {{Spergel}, D.~N. and {Verde}, L. and {Peiris}, H.~V. and {Komatsu}, E. and {Nolta}, M.~R. and {Bennett}, C.~L. and {Halpern}, M. and {Hinshaw}, G. and {Jarosik}, N. and {Kogut}, A. and {Limon}, M. and {Meyer}, S.~S. and {Page}, L. and {Tucker}, G.~S. and {Weiland}, J.~L. and {Wollack}, E. and {Wright}, E.~L.},\n title = \"{First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Cosmic Microwave Background, Cosmology: Cosmological Parameters- Cosmology: Observations, Cosmology: Early Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = sep,\n volume = {148},\n number = {1},\n pages = {175-194},\n doi = {10.1086/377226},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0302209},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJS..148..175S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Seljak2000,\n author = {{Seljak}, Uro{\\v{s}}},\n title = \"{Analytic model for galaxy and dark matter clustering}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERAL, COSMOLOGY: THEORY, DARK MATTER, Astrophysics},\n year = 2000,\n month = oct,\n volume = {318},\n number = {1},\n pages = {203-213},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03715.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0001493},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.318..203S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Takada&Jain2003,\n author = {{Takada}, Masahiro and {Jain}, Bhuvnesh},\n title = \"{The three-point correlation function in cosmology}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = apr,\n volume = {340},\n number = {2},\n pages = {580-608},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06321.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0209167},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.340..580T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{RodriguezPuebla2016,\n author = {{Rodr{\\'\\i}guez-Puebla}, Aldo and {Behroozi}, Peter and {Primack}, Joel and {Klypin}, Anatoly and {Lee}, Christoph and {Hellinger}, Doug},\n title = \"{Halo and subhalo demographics with Planck cosmological parameters: Bolshoi-Planck and MultiDark-Planck simulations}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: haloes, dark matter, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = oct,\n volume = {462},\n number = {1},\n pages = {893-916},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw1705},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1602.04813},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462..893R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sheth2001,\n author = {{Sheth}, Ravi K. and {Mo}, H.~J. and {Tormen}, Giuseppe},\n title = \"{Ellipsoidal collapse and an improved model for the number and spatial distribution of dark matter haloes}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERAL, COSMOLOGY: THEORY, DARK MATTER, Astrophysics},\n year = 2001,\n month = may,\n volume = {323},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1-12},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04006.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9907024},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.323....1S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Neistein2006,\n author = {{Neistein}, Eyal and {van den Bosch}, Frank C. and {Dekel}, Avishai},\n title = \"{Natural downsizing in hierarchical galaxy formation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, dark matter, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = oct,\n volume = {372},\n number = {2},\n pages = {933-948},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10918.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0605045},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.372..933N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ocvirk2008,\n author = {{Ocvirk}, P. and {Pichon}, C. and {Teyssier}, R.},\n title = \"{Bimodal gas accretion in the Horizon-MareNostrum galaxy formation simulation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, hydrodynamics, methods: N-body simulations, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, intergalactic medium, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = nov,\n volume = {390},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1326-1338},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13763.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0803.4506},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.390.1326O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Keres2005,\n author = {{Kere{\\v{s}}}, Du{\\v{s}}an and {Katz}, Neal and {Weinberg}, David H. and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel},\n title = \"{How do galaxies get their gas?}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, cooling flows, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = oct,\n volume = {363},\n number = {1},\n pages = {2-28},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09451.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0407095},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.363....2K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dekel2006,\n author = {{Dekel}, Avishai and {Birnboim}, Yuval},\n title = \"{Galaxy bimodality due to cold flows and shock heating}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {shock waves, cooling flows, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, dark matter, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = may,\n volume = {368},\n number = {1},\n pages = {2-20},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10145.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0412300},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.368....2D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Fakhouri2010,\n author = {{Fakhouri}, Onsi and {Ma}, Chung-Pei and {Boylan-Kolchin}, Michael},\n title = \"{The merger rates and mass assembly histories of dark matter haloes in the two Millennium simulations}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, cosmology: theory, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = aug,\n volume = {406},\n number = {4},\n pages = {2267-2278},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16859.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1001.2304},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.406.2267F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Fakhouri&Ma2010,\n author = {{Fakhouri}, Onsi and {Ma}, Chung-Pei},\n title = \"{Dark matter halo growth - II. Diffuse accretion and its environmental dependence}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: N-body simulations, galaxies: formation, cosmology: theory, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = feb,\n volume = {401},\n number = {4},\n pages = {2245-2256},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15844.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0906.1196},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.401.2245F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sheth&Tormen1999,\n author = {{Sheth}, Ravi K. and {Tormen}, Giuseppe},\n title = \"{Large-scale bias and the peak background split}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n year = 1999,\n month = sep,\n volume = {308},\n number = {1},\n pages = {119-126},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02692.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9901122},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.308..119S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{vandenBosch2017,\n author = {{van den Bosch}, Frank C.},\n title = \"{Dissecting the evolution of dark matter subhaloes in the Bolshoi simulation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, methods: statistical, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, dark matter, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2017,\n month = jun,\n volume = {468},\n number = {1},\n pages = {885-909},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx520},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1611.02657},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.468..885V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Zu&Mandelbaum2016,\n author = {{Zu}, Ying and {Mandelbaum}, Rachel},\n title = \"{Mapping stellar content to dark matter haloes - II. Halo mass is the main driver of galaxy quenching}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: weak, methods: statistical, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, cosmology: observations, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = apr,\n volume = {457},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4360-4383},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw221},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1509.06758},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457.4360Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Springel2001,\n author = {{Springel}, Volker and {White}, Simon D.~M. and {Tormen}, Giuseppe and {Kauffmann}, Guinevere},\n title = \"{Populating a cluster of galaxies - I. Results at z=0}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERAL, GALAXIES: FORMATION, DARK MATTER, Astrophysics},\n year = 2001,\n month = dec,\n volume = {328},\n number = {3},\n pages = {726-750},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04912.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0012055},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.328..726S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Behroozi2013b,\n author = {{Behroozi}, Peter S. and {Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Wu}, Hao-Yi and {Busha}, Michael T. and {Klypin}, Anatoly A. and {Primack}, Joel R.},\n title = \"{Gravitationally Consistent Halo Catalogs and Merger Trees for Precision Cosmology}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark matter, galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = jan,\n volume = {763},\n number = {1},\n eid = {18},\n pages = {18},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/18},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1110.4370},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...763...18B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Zu&Mandelbaum2015,\n author = {{Zu}, Ying and {Mandelbaum}, Rachel},\n title = \"{Mapping stellar content to dark matter haloes using galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing in the SDSS DR7}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: weak, methods: statistical, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, cosmology: observations, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = dec,\n volume = {454},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1161-1191},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv2062},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1505.02781},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.1161Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tegmark&Peebles1998,\n author = {{Tegmark}, Max and {Peebles}, P.~J.~E.},\n title = \"{The Time Evolution of Bias}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: STATISTICS, COSMOLOGY: LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSE, Galaxies: Statistics, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 1998,\n month = jun,\n volume = {500},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L79-L82},\n doi = {10.1086/311426},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9804067},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...500L..79T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Fry1996,\n author = {{Fry}, J.~N.},\n title = \"{The Evolution of Bias}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {COSMOLOGY: LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSE},\n year = 1996,\n month = apr,\n volume = {461},\n pages = {L65},\n doi = {10.1086/310006},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...461L..65F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mann1998,\n author = {{Mann}, R.~G. and {Peacock}, J.~A. and {Heavens}, A.~F.},\n title = \"{Eulerian bias and the galaxy density field}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Space Density, Density Distribution, Galactic Structure, Euler Equations Of Motion, Galactic Clusters, Statistical Distributions, Universe, Power Spectra, Astrophysics, GALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERAL, LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSE, Astrophysics},\n year = 1998,\n month = jan,\n volume = {293},\n number = {3},\n pages = {209-221},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01053.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9708031},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998MNRAS.293..209M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tinker2005,\n author = {{Tinker}, Jeremy L. and {Weinberg}, David H. and {Zheng}, Zheng and {Zehavi}, Idit},\n title = \"{On the Mass-to-Light Ratio of Large-Scale Structure}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Clusters: General, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = sep,\n volume = {631},\n number = {1},\n pages = {41-58},\n doi = {10.1086/432084},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0411777},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...631...41T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tinker2008,\n author = {{Tinker}, Jeremy L. and {Conroy}, Charlie and {Norberg}, Peder and {Patiri}, Santiago G. and {Weinberg}, David H. and {Warren}, Michael S.},\n title = \"{Void Statistics in Large Galaxy Redshift Surveys: Does Halo Occupation of Field Galaxies Depend on Environment?}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: theory, galaxies: halos, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = oct,\n volume = {686},\n number = {1},\n pages = {53-71},\n doi = {10.1086/589983},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0707.3445},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...686...53T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{HernandezAguayo2023,\n author = {{Hern{\\'a}ndez-Aguayo}, C{\\'e}sar and {Springel}, Volker and {Pakmor}, R{\\\"u}diger and {Barrera}, Monica and {Ferlito}, Fulvio and {White}, Simon D.~M. and {Hernquist}, Lars and {Hadzhiyska}, Boryana and {Delgado}, Ana Maria and {Kannan}, Rahul and {Bose}, Sownak and {Frenk}, Carlos},\n title = \"{The MillenniumTNG Project: high-precision predictions for matter clustering and halo statistics}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: haloes, large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = sep,\n volume = {524},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2556-2578},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad1657},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2210.10059},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.2556H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Knebe2011,\n author = {{Knebe}, Alexander and {Knollmann}, Steffen R. and {Muldrew}, Stuart I. and {Pearce}, Frazer R. and {Aragon-Calvo}, Miguel Angel and {Ascasibar}, Yago and {Behroozi}, Peter S. and {Ceverino}, Daniel and {Colombi}, Stephane and {Diemand}, Juerg and {Dolag}, Klaus and {Falck}, Bridget L. and {Fasel}, Patricia and {Gardner}, Jeff and {Gottl{\\\"o}ber}, Stefan and {Hsu}, Chung-Hsing and {Iannuzzi}, Francesca and {Klypin}, Anatoly and {Luki{\\'c}}, Zarija and {Maciejewski}, Michal and {McBride}, Cameron and {Neyrinck}, Mark C. and {Planelles}, Susana and {Potter}, Doug and {Quilis}, Vicent and {Rasera}, Yann and {Read}, Justin I. and {Ricker}, Paul M. and {Roy}, Fabrice and {Springel}, Volker and {Stadel}, Joachim and {Stinson}, Greg and {Sutter}, P.~M. and {Turchaninov}, Victor and {Tweed}, Dylan and {Yepes}, Gustavo and {Zemp}, Marcel},\n title = \"{Haloes gone MAD: The Halo-Finder Comparison Project}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: miscellaneous, cosmology: theory, dark matter, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = aug,\n volume = {415},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2293-2318},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18858.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1104.0949},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.415.2293K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Burkert1995,\n author = {{Burkert}, A.},\n title = \"{The Structure of Dark Matter Halos in Dwarf Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {COSMOLOGY: DARK MATTER, GALAXIES: SPIRAL, GALAXIES: STRUCTURE, Astrophysics},\n year = 1995,\n month = jul,\n volume = {447},\n pages = {L25-L28},\n doi = {10.1086/309560},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9504041},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...447L..25B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Navarro2004,\n author = {{Navarro}, J.~F. and {Hayashi}, E. and {Power}, C. and {Jenkins}, A.~R. and {Frenk}, C.~S. and {White}, S.~D.~M. and {Springel}, V. and {Stadel}, J. and {Quinn}, T.~R.},\n title = \"{The inner structure of {\\ensuremath{\\Lambda}}CDM haloes - III. Universality and asymptotic slopes}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {gravitation, cosmology: theory, dark matter, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = apr,\n volume = {349},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1039-1051},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07586.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0311231},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.349.1039N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Press&Schechter1974,\n author = {{Press}, William H. and {Schechter}, Paul},\n title = \"{Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1974,\n month = feb,\n volume = {187},\n pages = {425-438},\n doi = {10.1086/152650},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...187..425P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@BOOK{Oswalt&Keel2013,\n author = {{Oswalt}, Terry D. and {Keel}, William C.},\n title = \"{Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems: Volume 6: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology}\",\n year = 2013,\n doi = {10.1007/978-94-007-5609-0},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013pss6.book.....O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kaiser1986,\n author = {{Kaiser}, N.},\n title = \"{Evolution and clustering of rich clusters.}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Computational Astrophysics, Galactic Clusters, Galactic Evolution, Dark Matter, Gravitational Collapse, Mass Distribution, Optical Properties, Red Shift, Scaling Laws, X Ray Spectra, Astrophysics},\n year = 1986,\n month = sep,\n volume = {222},\n pages = {323-345},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/222.2.323},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986MNRAS.222..323K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{vandenBosch2004,\n author = {{van den Bosch}, Frank C. and {Norberg}, Peder and {Mo}, H.~J. and {Yang}, Xiaohu},\n title = \"{Probing dark matter haloes with satellite kinematics}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: structure, dark matter, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = aug,\n volume = {352},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1302-1314},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08021.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0404033},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.352.1302V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sunyaev&Zeldovich1970,\n author = {{Sunyaev}, R.~A. and {Zeldovich}, Ya. B.},\n title = \"{Small-Scale Fluctuations of Relic Radiation}\",\n journal = {\\apss},\n keywords = {Optical Depth, Radio Emission, Entropy Density, Density Perturbation, Discrete Source},\n year = 1970,\n month = apr,\n volume = {7},\n number = {1},\n pages = {3-19},\n doi = {10.1007/BF00653471},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1970Ap&SS...7....3S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n%------------------------------------ Galaxies and star formation -----------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{Picouet2023,\n author = {{Picouet}, V. and {Arnouts}, S. and {Le Floc'h}, E. and {Moutard}, T. and {Kraljic}, K. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Sawicki}, M. and {Desprez}, G. and {Laigle}, C. and {Schiminovich}, D. and {de la Torre}, S. and {Gwyn}, S. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Dubois}, Y. and {Dav{\\'e}}, R. and {Toft}, S. and {Weaver}, J.~R. and {Shuntov}, M. and {Kauffmann}, O.~B.},\n title = \"{HSC-CLAUDS survey: The star formation rate functions since z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 2 and comparison with hydrodynamical simulations}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: statistics, surveys, ultraviolet: galaxies, infrared: galaxies, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = jul,\n volume = {675},\n eid = {A164},\n pages = {A164},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202245756},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2305.05504},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...675A.164P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Omukai2005,\n author = {{Omukai}, K. and {Tsuribe}, T. and {Schneider}, R. and {Ferrara}, A.},\n title = \"{Thermal and Fragmentation Properties of Star-forming Clouds in Low-Metallicity Environments}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Formation, Stars: Formation, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = jun,\n volume = {626},\n number = {2},\n pages = {627-643},\n doi = {10.1086/429955},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0503010},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...626..627O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Elbaz2011,\n author = {{Elbaz}, D. and {Dickinson}, M. and {Hwang}, H.~S. and {D{\\'\\i}az-Santos}, T. and {Magdis}, G. and {Magnelli}, B. and {Le Borgne}, D. and {Galliano}, F. and {Pannella}, M. and {Chanial}, P. and {Armus}, L. and {Charmandaris}, V. and {Daddi}, E. and {Aussel}, H. and {Popesso}, P. and {Kartaltepe}, J. and {Altieri}, B. and {Valtchanov}, I. and {Coia}, D. and {Dannerbauer}, H. and {Dasyra}, K. and {Leiton}, R. and {Mazzarella}, J. and {Alexander}, D.~M. and {Buat}, V. and {Burgarella}, D. and {Chary}, R. -R. and {Gilli}, R. and {Ivison}, R.~J. and {Juneau}, S. and {Le Floc'h}, E. and {Lutz}, D. and {Morrison}, G.~E. and {Mullaney}, J.~R. and {Murphy}, E. and {Pope}, A. and {Scott}, D. and {Brodwin}, M. and {Calzetti}, D. and {Cesarsky}, C. and {Charlot}, S. and {Dole}, H. and {Eisenhardt}, P. and {Ferguson}, H.~C. and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, N. and {Frayer}, D. and {Giavalisco}, M. and {Huynh}, M. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Papovich}, C. and {Reddy}, N. and {Surace}, C. and {Teplitz}, H. and {Yun}, M.~S. and {Wilson}, G.},\n title = \"{GOODS-Herschel: an infrared main sequence for star-forming galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, infrared: galaxies, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: starburst, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = sep,\n volume = {533},\n eid = {A119},\n pages = {A119},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201117239},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1105.2537},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...533A.119E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kartaltepe2015,\n author = {{Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Mozena}, Mark and {Kocevski}, Dale and {McIntosh}, Daniel H. and {Lotz}, Jennifer and {Bell}, Eric F. and {Faber}, Sandy and {Ferguson}, Harry and {Koo}, David and {Bassett}, Robert and {Bernyk}, Maksym and {Blancato}, Kirsten and {Bournaud}, Frederic and {Cassata}, Paolo and {Castellano}, Marco and {Cheung}, Edmond and {Conselice}, Christopher J. and {Croton}, Darren and {Dahlen}, Tomas and {de Mello}, Duilia F. and {DeGroot}, Laura and {Donley}, Jennifer and {Guedes}, Javiera and {Grogin}, Norman and {Hathi}, Nimish and {Hilton}, Matt and {Hollon}, Brett and {Koekemoer}, Anton and {Liu}, Nick and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {Martig}, Marie and {McGrath}, Elizabeth and {McPartland}, Conor and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Morlock}, Alice and {O'Leary}, Erin and {Peth}, Mike and {Pforr}, Janine and {Pillepich}, Annalisa and {Rosario}, David and {Soto}, Emmaris and {Straughn}, Amber and {Telford}, Olivia and {Sunnquist}, Ben and {Trump}, Jonathan and {Weiner}, Benjamin and {Wuyts}, Stijn and {Inami}, Hanae and {Kassin}, Susan and {Lani}, Caterina and {Poole}, Gregory B. and {Rizer}, Zachary},\n title = \"{CANDELS Visual Classifications: Scheme, Data Release, and First Results}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = nov,\n volume = {221},\n number = {1},\n eid = {11},\n pages = {11},\n doi = {10.1088/0067-0049/221/1/11},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1401.2455},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..221...11K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sutherland&Dopita1993,\n author = {{Sutherland}, Ralph S. and {Dopita}, M.~A.},\n title = \"{Cooling Functions for Low-Density Astrophysical Plasmas}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Cooling Flows (Astrophysics), Cosmic Plasma, Nonequilibrium Ionization, One Dimensional Flow, Plasma Slabs, Radiative Transfer, Charge Exchange, Electron Impact, Grid Generation (Mathematics), Hydrogen Recombinations, Ionization, Mathematical Models, Metallicity, Photoionization, Radiative Recombination, Rarefied Plasmas, Resonance Lines, Astrophysics, ATOMIC PROCESSES, GALAXIES: COOLING FLOWS, PLASMAS, RADIATIVE TRANSFER},\n year = 1993,\n month = sep,\n volume = {88},\n pages = {253},\n doi = {10.1086/191823},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJS...88..253S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Birnboim&Dekel2003,\n author = {{Birnboim}, Yuval and {Dekel}, Avishai},\n title = \"{Virial shocks in galactic haloes?}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {hydrodynamics, shock waves, cooling flows, galaxies: formation, galaxies: ISM, dark matter, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = oct,\n volume = {345},\n number = {1},\n pages = {349-364},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06955.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0302161},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.345..349B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Rees&Ostriker1977,\n author = {{Rees}, M.~J. and {Ostriker}, J.~P.},\n title = \"{Cooling, dynamics and fragmentation of massive gas clouds: clues to the masses and radii of galaxies and clusters.}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astronomical Models, Big Bang Cosmology, Galactic Clusters, Galactic Evolution, Lyman Alpha Radiation, Protostars, Clouds, Critical Mass, Fragmentation, Radiation Pressure, Stellar Evolution, Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 1977,\n month = jun,\n volume = {179},\n pages = {541-559},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/179.4.541},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977MNRAS.179..541R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Conselice2022,\n author = {{Conselice}, Christopher J. and {Mundy}, Carl J. and {Ferreira}, Leonardo and {Duncan}, Kenneth},\n title = \"{A Direct Measurement of Galaxy Major and Minor Merger Rates and Stellar Mass Accretion Histories at Z < 3 Using Galaxy Pairs in the REFINE Survey}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, 594, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = dec,\n volume = {940},\n number = {2},\n eid = {168},\n pages = {168},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac9b1a},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2207.03984},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940..168C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Das2021,\n author = {{Das}, Apashanka and {Pandey}, Biswajit and {Sarkar}, Suman and {Dutta}, Arunima},\n title = \"{Galaxy interactions in different environments: An analysis of galaxy pairs from the SDSS}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2021,\n month = aug,\n eid = {arXiv:2108.05874},\n pages = {arXiv:2108.05874},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2108.05874},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2108.05874},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021arXiv210805874D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Behroozi2015b,\n author = {{Behroozi}, Peter S. and {Zhu}, Guangtun and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Hearin}, Andrew P. and {Lotz}, Jennifer and {Silk}, Joseph and {Kassin}, Susan and {Lu}, Yu and {Croton}, Darren and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Watson}, Douglas F.},\n title = \"{Using galaxy pairs to probe star formation during major halo mergers}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = jun,\n volume = {450},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1546-1564},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv728},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1502.01342},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.450.1546B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Shibuya2016,\n author = {{Shibuya}, Takatoshi and {Ouchi}, Masami and {Kubo}, Mariko and {Harikane}, Yuichi},\n title = \"{Morphologies of \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde190,000 Galaxies at z = 0-10 Revealed with HST Legacy Data. II. Evolution of Clumpy Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, early universe, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = apr,\n volume = {821},\n number = {2},\n eid = {72},\n pages = {72},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/72},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1511.07054},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821...72S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tacchella2015,\n author = {{Tacchella}, S. and {Carollo}, C.~M. and {Renzini}, A. and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, N.~M. and {Lang}, P. and {Wuyts}, S. and {Cresci}, G. and {Dekel}, A. and {Genzel}, R. and {Lilly}, S.~J. and {Mancini}, C. and {Newman}, S. and {Onodera}, M. and {Shapley}, A. and {Tacconi}, L. and {Woo}, J. and {Zamorani}, G.},\n title = \"{Evidence for mature bulges and an inside-out quenching phase 3 billion years after the Big Bang}\",\n journal = {Science},\n keywords = {ASTRONOMY, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = apr,\n volume = {348},\n number = {6232},\n pages = {314-317},\n doi = {10.1126/science.1261094},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1504.04021},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Sci...348..314T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Naab2009,\n author = {{Naab}, Thorsten and {Johansson}, Peter H. and {Ostriker}, Jeremiah P.},\n title = \"{Minor Mergers and the Size Evolution of Elliptical Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cd, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: structure, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = jul,\n volume = {699},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L178-L182},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/L178},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0903.1636},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...699L.178N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Simmons2014,\n author = {{Simmons}, B.~D. and {Melvin}, Thomas and {Lintott}, Chris and {Masters}, Karen L. and {Willett}, Kyle W. and {Keel}, William C. and {Smethurst}, R.~J. and {Cheung}, Edmond and {Nichol}, Robert C. and {Schawinski}, Kevin and {Rutkowski}, Michael and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Bell}, Eric F. and {Casteels}, Kevin R.~V. and {Conselice}, Christopher J. and {Almaini}, Omar and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Fortson}, Lucy and {Hartley}, William and {Kocevski}, Dale and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {McIntosh}, Daniel H. and {Mortlock}, Alice and {Newman}, Jeffrey A. and {Ownsworth}, Jamie and {Bamford}, Steven and {Dahlen}, Tomas and {Faber}, Sandra M. and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Galametz}, Audrey and {Grogin}, N.~A. and {Gr{\\\"u}tzbauch}, Ruth and {Guo}, Yicheng and {H{\\\"a}u{\\ss}ler}, Boris and {Jek}, Kian J. and {Kaviraj}, Sugata and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {Peth}, Michael and {Salvato}, Mara and {Wiklind}, Tommy and {Wuyts}, Stijn},\n title = \"{Galaxy Zoo: CANDELS barred discs and bar fractions}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: general, galaxies: spiral, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2014,\n month = dec,\n volume = {445},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3466-3474},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu1817},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1409.1214},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.3466S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Juneau2005,\n author = {{Juneau}, St{\\'e}phanie and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Crampton}, David and {McCarthy}, Patrick J. and {Savaglio}, Sandra and {Abraham}, Roberto and {Carlberg}, Raymond G. and {Chen}, Hsiao-Wen and {Le Borgne}, Damien and {Marzke}, Ronald O. and {Roth}, Kathy and {J{\\o}rgensen}, Inger and {Hook}, Isobel and {Murowinski}, Richard},\n title = \"{Cosmic Star Formation History and Its Dependence on Galaxy Stellar Mass}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Formation, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = feb,\n volume = {619},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L135-L138},\n doi = {10.1086/427937},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0411775},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...619L.135J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Delvecchio2021,\n author = {{Delvecchio}, I. and {Daddi}, E. and {Sargent}, M.~T. and {Jarvis}, M.~J. and {Elbaz}, D. and {Jin}, S. and {Liu}, D. and {Whittam}, I.~H. and {Algera}, H. and {Carraro}, R. and {D'Eugenio}, C. and {Delhaize}, J. and {Kalita}, B.~S. and {Leslie}, S. and {Moln{\\'a}r}, D. Cs. and {Novak}, M. and {Prandoni}, I. and {Smol{\\v{c}}i{\\'c}}, V. and {Ao}, Y. and {Aravena}, M. and {Bournaud}, F. and {Collier}, J.~D. and {Randriamampandry}, S.~M. and {Randriamanakoto}, Z. and {Rodighiero}, G. and {Schober}, J. and {White}, S.~V. and {Zamorani}, G.},\n title = \"{The infrared-radio correlation of star-forming galaxies is strongly M$_{{\\ensuremath{\\star}}}$-dependent but nearly redshift-invariant since z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 4}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: star formation, radio continuum: galaxies, infrared: galaxies, galaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = mar,\n volume = {647},\n eid = {A123},\n pages = {A123},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202039647},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2010.05510},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...647A.123D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{RodriguezGomez2015,\n author = {{Rodriguez-Gomez}, Vicente and {Genel}, Shy and {Vogelsberger}, Mark and {Sijacki}, Debora and {Pillepich}, Annalisa and {Sales}, Laura V. and {Torrey}, Paul and {Snyder}, Greg and {Nelson}, Dylan and {Springel}, Volker and {Ma}, Chung-Pei and {Hernquist}, Lars},\n title = \"{The merger rate of galaxies in the Illustris simulation: a comparison with observations and semi-empirical models}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: interactions, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = may,\n volume = {449},\n number = {1},\n pages = {49-64},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv264},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1502.01339},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449...49R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Laigle2018,\n author = {{Laigle}, C. and {Pichon}, C. and {Arnouts}, S. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Dubois}, Y. and {Devriendt}, J. and {Slyz}, A. and {Le Borgne}, D. and {Benoit-L{\\'e}vy}, A. and {Hwang}, Ho Seong and {Ilbert}, O. and {Kraljic}, K. and {Malavasi}, N. and {Park}, Changbom and {Vibert}, D.},\n title = \"{COSMOS2015 photometric redshifts probe the impact of filaments on galaxy properties}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, methods: observational, techniques: photometric, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = mar,\n volume = {474},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5437-5458},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx3055},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1702.08810},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.5437L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Nelson2013,\n author = {{Nelson}, Dylan and {Vogelsberger}, Mark and {Genel}, Shy and {Sijacki}, Debora and {Kere{\\v{s}}}, Du{\\v{s}}an and {Springel}, Volker and {Hernquist}, Lars},\n title = \"{Moving mesh cosmology: tracing cosmological gas accretion}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = mar,\n volume = {429},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3353-3370},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sts595},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1301.6753},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429.3353N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{GallaragaEspinosa2023,\n author = {{Gal{\\'a}rraga-Espinosa}, Daniela and {Garaldi}, Enrico and {Kauffmann}, Guinevere},\n title = \"{Flows around galaxies. I. The dependence of galaxy connectivity on cosmic environments and effects on the star formation rate}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {large-scale structure of Universe, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: statistics, methods: numerical, methods: statistical, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = mar,\n volume = {671},\n eid = {A160},\n pages = {A160},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202244935},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2209.05495},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...671A.160G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Winkel2021,\n author = {{Winkel}, N. and {Pasquali}, A. and {Kraljic}, K. and {Smith}, R. and {Gallazzi}, A. and {Jackson}, T.~M.},\n title = \"{The imprint of cosmic web quenching on central galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: general, galaxies: statistics, galaxies: stellar content, cosmology: large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = aug,\n volume = {505},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4920-4934},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stab1562},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2105.13368},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.4920W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{GallaragaEspinosa2025,\n author = {{Gal{\\'a}rraga-Espinosa}, Daniela and {Kauffmann}, Guinevere and {Bonoli}, Silvia and {Lucie-Smith}, Luisa and {Gonz{\\'a}lez Delgado}, Rosa M. and {Tempel}, Elmo and {Abramo}, Raul and {Gurung-L{\\'o}pez}, Siddharta and {Marra}, Valerio and {Alcaniz}, Jailson and {Benitez}, Narciso and {Carneiro}, Saulo and {Cenarro}, Javier and {Crist{\\'o}bal-Hornillos}, David and {Dupke}, Renato and {Ederoclite}, Alessandro and {Hern{\\'a}n-Caballero}, Antonio and {Hern{\\'a}ndez-Monteagudo}, Carlos and {L{\\'o}pez-Sanjuan}, Carlos and {Mar{\\'\\i}n-Franch}, Antonio and {Mendes de Oliveira}, Claudia and {Moles}, Mariano and {Sodr{\\'e}}, Jr., Laerte and {Taylor}, Keith and {Varela}, Jes{\\'u}s and {V{\\'a}zquez Rami{\\'o}}, Hector},\n title = \"{Unveiling the small-scale web around galaxies with miniJPAS and DESI}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {methods: data analysis, methods: statistical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: star formation, large-scale structure of Universe, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2026,\n month = jan,\n volume = {706},\n eid = {A21},\n pages = {A21},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202556021},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2506.15345},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026A&A...706A..21G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wetzel2009,\n author = {{Wetzel}, Andrew R. and {Cohn}, J.~D. and {White}, Martin},\n title = \"{The clustering and host haloes of galaxy mergers at high redshift}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: N-body simulations, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: interactions, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = apr,\n volume = {394},\n number = {4},\n pages = {2182-2190},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14488.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0810.3650},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.394.2182W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Stewart2009,\n author = {{Stewart}, Kyle R. and {Bullock}, James S. and {Barton}, Elizabeth J. and {Wechsler}, Risa H.},\n title = \"{Galaxy Mergers and Dark Matter Halo Mergers in {\\ensuremath{\\Lambda}}CDM: Mass, Redshift, and Mass-Ratio Dependence}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: theory, dark matter, galaxies: formation, galaxies: halos, methods: N-body simulations, Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = sep,\n volume = {702},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1005-1015},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/702/2/1005},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0811.1218},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...702.1005S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Schechter1976,\n author = {{Schechter}, P.},\n title = \"{An analytic expression for the luminosity function for galaxies.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1976,\n month = jan,\n volume = {203},\n pages = {297-306},\n doi = {10.1086/154079},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...203..297S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{FaucherGiguere2012,\n author = {{Faucher-Gigu{\\`e}re}, Claude-Andr{\\'e} and {Quataert}, Eliot},\n title = \"{The physics of galactic winds driven by active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {shock waves, galaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2012,\n month = sep,\n volume = {425},\n number = {1},\n pages = {605-622},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21512.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1204.2547},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.425..605F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Davidzon2017,\n author = {{Davidzon}, I. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Laigle}, C. and {Coupon}, J. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Delvecchio}, I. and {Masters}, D. and {Capak}, P. and {Hsieh}, B.~C. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Tresse}, L. and {Bethermin}, M. and {Chang}, Y. -Y. and {Faisst}, A.~L. and {Le Floc'h}, E. and {Steinhardt}, C. and {Toft}, S. and {Aussel}, H. and {Dubois}, C. and {Hasinger}, G. and {Salvato}, M. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Scoville}, N. and {Silverman}, J.~D.},\n title = \"{The COSMOS2015 galaxy stellar mass function . Thirteen billion years of stellar mass assembly in ten snapshots}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies: statistics, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2017,\n month = sep,\n volume = {605},\n eid = {A70},\n pages = {A70},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201730419},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1701.02734},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...605A..70D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Croton2006,\n author = {{Croton}, Darren J. and {Springel}, Volker and {White}, Simon D.~M. and {De Lucia}, G. and {Frenk}, C.~S. and {Gao}, L. and {Jenkins}, A. and {Kauffmann}, G. and {Navarro}, J.~F. and {Yoshida}, N.},\n title = \"{The many lives of active galactic nuclei: cooling flows, black holes and the luminosities and colours of galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {black hole physics, galaxies: active, cooling flows, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = jan,\n volume = {365},\n number = {1},\n pages = {11-28},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09675.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0508046},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.365...11C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Oser2012,\n author = {{Oser}, Ludwig and {Naab}, Thorsten and {Ostriker}, Jeremiah P. and {Johansson}, Peter H.},\n title = \"{The Cosmological Size and Velocity Dispersion Evolution of Massive Early-type Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2012,\n month = jan,\n volume = {744},\n number = {1},\n eid = {63},\n pages = {63},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/63},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1106.5490},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...744...63O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dayal2013,\n author = {{Dayal}, Pratika and {Dunlop}, James S. and {Maio}, Umberto and {Ciardi}, Benedetta},\n title = \"{Simulating the assembly of galaxies at redshifts z = 6-12}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = sep,\n volume = {434},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1486-1504},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt1108},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1211.1034},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.434.1486D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tacchella2022,\n author = {{Tacchella}, Sandro and {Conroy}, Charlie and {Faber}, S.~M. and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Leja}, Joel and {Barro}, Guillermo and {Cunningham}, Emily C. and {Deason}, Alis J. and {Guhathakurta}, Puragra and {Guo}, Yicheng and {Hernquist}, Lars and {Koo}, David C. and {McKinnon}, Kevin and {Rockosi}, Constance M. and {Speagle}, Joshua S. and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Yesuf}, Hassen M.},\n title = \"{Fast, Slow, Early, Late: Quenching Massive Galaxies at z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 0.8}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {594, 595, 621, 2040, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = feb,\n volume = {926},\n number = {2},\n eid = {134},\n pages = {134},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac449b},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2102.12494},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...926..134T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tacchella2019,\n author = {{Tacchella}, Sandro and {Diemer}, Benedikt and {Hernquist}, Lars and {Genel}, Shy and {Marinacci}, Federico and {Nelson}, Dylan and {Pillepich}, Annalisa and {Rodriguez-Gomez}, Vicente and {Sales}, Laura V. and {Springel}, Volker and {Vogelsberger}, Mark},\n title = \"{Morphology and star formation in IllustrisTNG: the build-up of spheroids and discs}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2019,\n month = aug,\n volume = {487},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5416-5440},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz1657},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1904.12860},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.5416T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Harikane2022,\n author = {{Harikane}, Yuichi and {Ono}, Yoshiaki and {Ouchi}, Masami and {Liu}, Chengze and {Sawicki}, Marcin and {Shibuya}, Takatoshi and {Behroozi}, Peter S. and {He}, Wanqiu and {Shimasaku}, Kazuhiro and {Arnouts}, Stephane and {Coupon}, Jean and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Gwyn}, Stephen and {Huang}, Jiasheng and {Inoue}, Akio K. and {Kashikawa}, Nobunari and {Komiyama}, Yutaka and {Matsuoka}, Yoshiki and {Willott}, Chris J.},\n title = \"{GOLDRUSH. IV. Luminosity Functions and Clustering Revealed with 4,000,000 Galaxies at z 2-7: Galaxy-AGN Transition, Star Formation Efficiency, and Implication for Evolution at z > 10}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy formation, High-redshift galaxies, 594, 595, 734, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = mar,\n volume = {259},\n number = {1},\n eid = {20},\n pages = {20},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4365/ac3dfc},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2108.01090},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..259...20H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Whitaker2012,\n author = {{Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {van Dokkum}, Pieter G. and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Franx}, Marijn},\n title = \"{The Star Formation Mass Sequence Out to z = 2.5}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2012,\n month = aug,\n volume = {754},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L29},\n pages = {L29},\n doi = {10.1088/2041-8205/754/2/L29},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1205.0547},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...754L..29W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Renzini&Peng2015,\n author = {{Renzini}, Alvio and {Peng}, Ying-jie},\n title = \"{An Objective Definition for the Main Sequence of Star-forming Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = mar,\n volume = {801},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L29},\n pages = {L29},\n doi = {10.1088/2041-8205/801/2/L29},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1502.01027},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...801L..29R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Daddi2007,\n author = {{Daddi}, E. and {Dickinson}, M. and {Morrison}, G. and {Chary}, R. and {Cimatti}, A. and {Elbaz}, D. and {Frayer}, D. and {Renzini}, A. and {Pope}, A. and {Alexander}, D.~M. and {Bauer}, F.~E. and {Giavalisco}, M. and {Huynh}, M. and {Kurk}, J. and {Mignoli}, M.},\n title = \"{Multiwavelength Study of Massive Galaxies at z\\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde2. I. Star Formation and Galaxy Growth}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Formation, Galaxies: High-Redshift, Galaxies: Starburst, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = nov,\n volume = {670},\n number = {1},\n pages = {156-172},\n doi = {10.1086/521818},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0705.2831},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...670..156D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tacconi2013,\n author = {{Tacconi}, L.~J. and {Neri}, R. and {Genzel}, R. and {Combes}, F. and {Bolatto}, A. and {Cooper}, M.~C. and {Wuyts}, S. and {Bournaud}, F. and {Burkert}, A. and {Comerford}, J. and {Cox}, P. and {Davis}, M. and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, N.~M. and {Garc{\\'\\i}a-Burillo}, S. and {Gracia-Carpio}, J. and {Lutz}, D. and {Naab}, T. and {Newman}, S. and {Omont}, A. and {Saintonge}, A. and {Shapiro Griffin}, K. and {Shapley}, A. and {Sternberg}, A. and {Weiner}, B.},\n title = \"{Phibss: Molecular Gas Content and Scaling Relations in z \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde 1-3 Massive, Main-sequence Star-forming Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: ISM, ISM: molecules, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = may,\n volume = {768},\n number = {1},\n eid = {74},\n pages = {74},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/74},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1211.5743},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...768...74T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{ODonnell2021,\n author = {{O'Donnell}, Christine and {Behroozi}, Peter and {More}, Surhud},\n title = \"{Observing correlations between dark matter accretion and galaxy growth - I. Recent star formation activity in isolated Milky Way-mass galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: star formation, dark matter, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = feb,\n volume = {501},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1253-1272},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa3654},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2005.08995},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.1253O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Oesch2014,\n author = {{Oesch}, P.~A. and {Bouwens}, R.~J. and {Illingworth}, G.~D. and {Labb{\\'e}}, I. and {Smit}, R. and {Franx}, M. and {van Dokkum}, P.~G. and {Momcheva}, I. and {Ashby}, M.~L.~N. and {Fazio}, G.~G. and {Huang}, J. -S. and {Willner}, S.~P. and {Gonzalez}, V. and {Magee}, D. and {Trenti}, M. and {Brammer}, G.~B. and {Skelton}, R.~E. and {Spitler}, L.~R.},\n title = \"{The Most Luminous z \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde 9-10 Galaxy Candidates Yet Found: The Luminosity Function, Cosmic Star-formation Rate, and the First Mass Density Estimate at 500 Myr}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = may,\n volume = {786},\n number = {2},\n eid = {108},\n pages = {108},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/108},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1309.2280},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...786..108O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bouwens2012,\n author = {{Bouwens}, R.~J. and {Illingworth}, G.~D. and {Oesch}, P.~A. and {Franx}, M. and {Labb{\\'e}}, I. and {Trenti}, M. and {van Dokkum}, P. and {Carollo}, C.~M. and {Gonz{\\'a}lez}, V. and {Smit}, R. and {Magee}, D.},\n title = \"{UV-continuum Slopes at z \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde 4-7 from the HUDF09+ERS+CANDELS Observations: Discovery of a Well-defined UV Color-Magnitude Relationship for z >= 4 Star-forming Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = aug,\n volume = {754},\n number = {2},\n eid = {83},\n pages = {83},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/83},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1109.0994},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...754...83B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Fall&Efstathiou1980,\n author = {{Fall}, S.~M. and {Efstathiou}, G.},\n title = \"{Formation and rotation of disc galaxies with haloes.}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Disk Galaxies, Galactic Evolution, Galactic Rotation, Galactic Structure, Halos, Angular Momentum, Astronomical Models, Interstellar Gas, Mass Ratios, Astrophysics},\n year = 1980,\n month = oct,\n volume = {193},\n pages = {189-206},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/193.2.189},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980MNRAS.193..189F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kassin2012,\n author = {{Kassin}, Susan A. and {Weiner}, Benjamin J. and {Faber}, S.~M. and {Gardner}, Jonathan P. and {Willmer}, C.~N.~A. and {Coil}, Alison L. and {Cooper}, Michael C. and {Devriendt}, Julien and {Dutton}, Aaron A. and {Guhathakurta}, Puragra and {Koo}, David C. and {Metevier}, A.~J. and {Noeske}, Kai G. and {Primack}, Joel R.},\n title = \"{The Epoch of Disk Settling: z \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde 1 to Now}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = oct,\n volume = {758},\n number = {2},\n eid = {106},\n pages = {106},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/106},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1207.7072},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...758..106K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Langeroodi2023,\n author = {{Langeroodi}, Danial and {Hjorth}, Jens and {Chen}, Wenlei and {Kelly}, Patrick L. and {Williams}, Hayley and {Lin}, Yu-Heng and {Scarlata}, Claudia and {Zitrin}, Adi and {Broadhurst}, Tom and {Diego}, Jose M. and {Huang}, Xiaosheng and {Filippenko}, Alexei V. and {Foley}, Ryan J. and {Jha}, Saurabh and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Oguri}, Masamune and {Perez-Fournon}, Ismael and {Pierel}, Justin and {Poidevin}, Frederick and {Strolger}, Lou},\n title = \"{Evolution of the Mass-Metallicity Relation from Redshift z {\\ensuremath{\\approx}} 8 to the Local Universe}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy chemical evolution, Chemical abundances, Metallicity, High-redshift galaxies, 594, 580, 224, 1031, 734, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = nov,\n volume = {957},\n number = {1},\n eid = {39},\n pages = {39},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/acdbc1},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2212.02491},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...957...39L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Madau&Dickinson2014,\n author = {{Madau}, Piero and {Dickinson}, Mark},\n title = \"{Cosmic Star-Formation History}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = aug,\n volume = {52},\n pages = {415-486},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1403.0007},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ARA&A..52..415M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kawamura2009,\n author = {{Kawamura}, Akiko and {Mizuno}, Yoji and {Minamidani}, Tetsuhiro and {Filipovi{\\'c}}, Miroslav D. and {Staveley-Smith}, Lister and {Kim}, Sungeun and {Mizuno}, Norikazu and {Onishi}, Toshikazu and {Mizuno}, Akira and {Fukui}, Yasuo},\n title = \"{The Second Survey of the Molecular Clouds in the Large Magellanic Cloud by NANTEN. II. Star Formation}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {galaxies: individual: Large Magellanic Cloud, galaxies: star clusters, ISM: clouds, stars: formation, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = sep,\n volume = {184},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1-17},\n doi = {10.1088/0067-0049/184/1/1},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0908.1168},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..184....1K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Clark2012,\n author = {{Clark}, Paul C. and {Glover}, Simon C.~O. and {Klessen}, Ralf S. and {Bonnell}, Ian A.},\n title = \"{How long does it take to form a molecular cloud?}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {stars: formation, ISM: clouds, ISM: molecules, galaxies: ISM, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2012,\n month = aug,\n volume = {424},\n number = {4},\n pages = {2599-2613},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21259.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1204.5570},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.424.2599C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Efstathiou1992,\n author = {{Efstathiou}, G.},\n title = \"{Suppressing the formation of dwarf galaxies via photoionization}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Cosmic Plasma, Cosmology, Diffuse Radiation, Dwarf Galaxies, Galactic Evolution, Photoionization, Quasars, Helium Plasma, Hydrogen Plasma, Plasma Cooling, Red Shift, Supernovae, Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 1992,\n month = may,\n volume = {256},\n number = {2},\n pages = {43P-47P},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/256.1.43P},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.256P..43E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Benson2002,\n author = {{Benson}, A.~J. and {Lacey}, C.~G. and {Baugh}, C.~M. and {Cole}, S. and {Frenk}, C.~S.},\n title = \"{The effects of photoionization on galaxy formation - I. Model and results at z=0}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, intergalactic medium, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics},\n year = 2002,\n month = jun,\n volume = {333},\n number = {1},\n pages = {156-176},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05387.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0108217},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.333..156B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hopkins2012,\n author = {{Hopkins}, Philip F. and {Kere{\\v{s}}}, Dusan and {Murray}, Norman and {Quataert}, Eliot and {Hernquist}, Lars},\n title = \"{Stellar feedback and bulge formation in clumpy discs}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {stars: formation, galaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Galaxy Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = dec,\n volume = {427},\n number = {2},\n pages = {968-978},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21981.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1111.6591},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.427..968H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dekel&Silk1986,\n author = {{Dekel}, A. and {Silk}, J.},\n title = \"{The Origin of Dwarf Galaxies, Cold Dark Matter, and Biased Galaxy Formation}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Abundance, Cold Plasmas, Dark Matter, Dwarf Galaxies, Galactic Evolution, Stellar Winds, Virgo Galactic Cluster, Big Bang Cosmology, Galactic Structure, Local Group (Astronomy), Mass To Light Ratios, Stellar Evolution, Supernovae, Astrophysics, COSMOLOGY, GALAXIES: CLUSTERING, GALAXIES: FORMATION, GALAXIES: INTERNAL MOTIONS, GALAXIES: STRUCTURE},\n year = 1986,\n month = apr,\n volume = {303},\n pages = {39},\n doi = {10.1086/164050},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...303...39D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Benson2003,\n author = {{Benson}, A.~J. and {Bower}, R.~G. and {Frenk}, C.~S. and {Lacey}, C.~G. and {Baugh}, C.~M. and {Cole}, S.},\n title = \"{What Shapes the Luminosity Function of Galaxies?}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Conduction, Galaxies: Cooling Flows, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Formation, Galaxies: Luminosity Function, Mass Function, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = dec,\n volume = {599},\n number = {1},\n pages = {38-49},\n doi = {10.1086/379160},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0302450},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...599...38B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Springel2005,\n author = {{Springel}, Volker and {Di Matteo}, Tiziana and {Hernquist}, Lars},\n title = \"{Black Holes in Galaxy Mergers: The Formation of Red Elliptical Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Formation, Methods: Numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = feb,\n volume = {620},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L79-L82},\n doi = {10.1086/428772},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0409436},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...620L..79S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Murray2005,\n author = {{Murray}, Norman and {Quataert}, Eliot and {Thompson}, Todd A.},\n title = \"{On the Maximum Luminosity of Galaxies and Their Central Black Holes: Feedback from Momentum-driven Winds}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Formation, Galaxies: Fundamental Parameters, Galaxies: General, Galaxies: Starburst, Galaxies: Intergalactic Medium, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = jan,\n volume = {618},\n number = {2},\n pages = {569-585},\n doi = {10.1086/426067},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0406070},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...618..569M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Schmidt1959,\n author = {{Schmidt}, Maarten},\n title = \"{The Rate of Star Formation.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1959,\n month = mar,\n volume = {129},\n pages = {243},\n doi = {10.1086/146614},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1959ApJ...129..243S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kennicutt1998,\n author = {{Kennicutt}, Jr., Robert C.},\n title = \"{The Global Schmidt Law in Star-forming Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: EVOLUTION, GALAXIES: ISM, GALAXIES: SPIRAL, GALAXIES: STELLAR CONTENT, GALAXIES: STARBURST, STARS: FORMATION, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: ISM, Galaxies: Spiral, Galaxies: Starburst, Galaxies: Stellar Content, Stars: Formation, Astrophysics},\n year = 1998,\n month = may,\n volume = {498},\n number = {2},\n pages = {541-552},\n doi = {10.1086/305588},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9712213},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...498..541K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bigiel2008,\n author = {{Bigiel}, F. and {Leroy}, A. and {Walter}, F. and {Brinks}, E. and {de Blok}, W.~J.~G. and {Madore}, B. and {Thornley}, M.~D.},\n title = \"{The Star Formation Law in Nearby Galaxies on Sub-Kpc Scales}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: ISM, radio lines: galaxies, radio lines: ISM, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = dec,\n volume = {136},\n number = {6},\n pages = {2846-2871},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2846},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0810.2541},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136.2846B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n%-------------------------------------- Galaxy-halo connection --------------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{deLapparent1986,\n author = {{de Lapparent}, V. and {Geller}, M.~J. and {Huchra}, J.~P.},\n title = \"{A Slice of the Universe}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Big Bang Cosmology, Galactic Evolution, Galactic Structure, Red Shift, Universe, Astronomical Models, Density Distribution, Astrophysics, COSMOLOGY, GALAXIES: CLUSTERING, GALAXIES: FORMATION},\n year = 1986,\n month = mar,\n volume = {302},\n pages = {L1},\n doi = {10.1086/184625},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...302L...1D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Trujillo2006,\n author = {{Trujillo}, Ignacio and {Carretero}, Conrado and {Patiri}, Santiago G.},\n title = \"{Detection of the Effect of Cosmological Large-Scale Structure on the Orientation of Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Dark Matter, Galaxies: Halos, Galaxies: Spiral, Galaxies: Structure, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Methods: Statistical, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = apr,\n volume = {640},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L111-L114},\n doi = {10.1086/503548},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0511680},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...640L.111T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Darvish2016,\n author = {{Darvish}, Behnam and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Sobral}, David and {Rettura}, Alessandro and {Scoville}, Nick and {Faisst}, Andreas and {Capak}, Peter},\n title = \"{The Effects of the Local Environment and Stellar Mass on Galaxy Quenching to z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 3}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = jul,\n volume = {825},\n number = {2},\n eid = {113},\n pages = {113},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/113},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1605.03182},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825..113D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Alfaro2022,\n author = {{Alfaro}, Ignacio G. and {Rodriguez}, Facundo and {Ruiz}, Andr{\\'e}s N. and {Luparello}, Heliana E. and {Lambas}, Diego Garcia},\n title = \"{How galaxies populate halos in extreme density environments: An analysis of the halo occupation distribution in SDSS}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {large-scale structure of Universe, Galaxy: halo, galaxies: statistics, methods: data analysis, methods: statistical, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology},\n year = 2022,\n month = sep,\n volume = {665},\n eid = {A44},\n pages = {A44},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202243542},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2203.07526},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...665A..44A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dvornik2018,\n author = {{Dvornik}, Andrej and {Hoekstra}, Henk and {Kuijken}, Konrad and {Schneider}, Peter and {Amon}, Alexandra and {Nakajima}, Reiko and {Viola}, Massimo and {Choi}, Ami and {Erben}, Thomas and {Farrow}, Daniel J. and {Heymans}, Catherine and {Hildebrandt}, Hendrik and {Sif{\\'o}n}, Crist{\\'o}bal and {Wang}, Lingyu},\n title = \"{Unveiling galaxy bias via the halo model, KiDS, and GAMA}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: weak, methods: statistical, surveys, galaxies: haloes, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = sep,\n volume = {479},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1240-1259},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty1502},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1802.00734},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.1240D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Coupon2012,\n author = {{Coupon}, J. and {Kilbinger}, M. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Arnouts}, S. and {Mellier}, Y. and {Abbas}, U. and {de la Torre}, S. and {Goranova}, Y. and {Hudelot}, P. and {Kneib}, J. -P. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O.},\n title = \"{Galaxy clustering in the CFHTLS-Wide: the changing relationship between galaxies and haloes since z \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde 1.2{\\ensuremath{\\star}}}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, large-scale structure of Universe, galaxies: distances and redshifts, galaxies: halos, galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = jun,\n volume = {542},\n eid = {A5},\n pages = {A5},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201117625},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1107.0616},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...542A...5C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hudson2015,\n author = {{Hudson}, Michael J. and {Gillis}, Bryan R. and {Coupon}, Jean and {Hildebrandt}, Hendrik and {Erben}, Thomas and {Heymans}, Catherine and {Hoekstra}, Henk and {Kitching}, Thomas D. and {Mellier}, Yannick and {Miller}, Lance and {Van Waerbeke}, Ludovic and {Bonnett}, Christopher and {Fu}, Liping and {Kuijken}, Konrad and {Rowe}, Barnaby and {Schrabback}, Tim and {Semboloni}, Elisabetta and {van Uitert}, Edo and {Velander}, Malin},\n title = \"{CFHTLenS: co-evolution of galaxies and their dark matter haloes}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: weak, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: observations, dark matter, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = feb,\n volume = {447},\n number = {1},\n pages = {298-314},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu2367},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1310.6784},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.447..298H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Yuan2024,\n author = {{Yuan}, Sihan and {Zhang}, Hanyu and {Ross}, Ashley J. and {Donald-McCann}, Jamie and {Hadzhiyska}, Boryana and {Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Zheng}, Zheng and {Alam}, Shadab and {Gonzalez-Perez}, Violeta and {Aguilar}, Jessica Nicole and {Ahlen}, Steven and {Bianchi}, Davide and {Brooks}, David and {de la Macorra}, Axel and {Fanning}, Kevin and {Forero-Romero}, Jaime E. and {Honscheid}, Klaus and {Ishak}, Mustapha and {Kehoe}, Robert and {Lasker}, James and {Landriau}, Martin and {Manera}, Marc and {Martini}, Paul and {Meisner}, Aaron and {Miquel}, Ramon and {Moustakas}, John and {Nadathur}, Seshadri and {Newman}, Jeffrey A. and {Nie}, Jundan and {Percival}, Will and {Poppett}, Claire and {Rocher}, Antoine and {Rossi}, Graziano and {Sanchez}, Eusebio and {Samushia}, Lado and {Schubnell}, Michael and {Seo}, Hee-Jong and {Tarl{\\'e}}, Gregory and {Weaver}, Benjamin Alan and {Yu}, Jiaxi and {Zhou}, Zhimin and {Zou}, Hu},\n title = \"{The DESI one-per cent survey: exploring the halo occupation distribution of luminous red galaxies and quasi-stellar objects with ABACUSSUMMIT}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, methods: statistical, galaxies: haloes, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = may,\n volume = {530},\n number = {1},\n pages = {947-965},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae359},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2306.06314},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530..947Y},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{RodriguezPuebla2013,\n author = {{Rodr{\\'\\i}guez-Puebla}, A. and {Avila-Reese}, V. and {Drory}, N.},\n title = \"{The Galaxy-Halo/Subhalo Connection: Mass Relations and Implications for Some Satellite Occupational Distributions}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark matter, galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: halos, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = apr,\n volume = {767},\n number = {1},\n eid = {92},\n pages = {92},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/92},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1302.0005},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767...92R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Yang2009,\n author = {{Yang}, Xiaohu and {Mo}, H.~J. and {van den Bosch}, Frank C.},\n title = \"{Galaxy Groups in the SDSS DR4. III. The Luminosity and Stellar Mass Functions}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark matter, galaxies: halos, large-scale structure of universe, methods: statistical, Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = apr,\n volume = {695},\n number = {2},\n pages = {900-916},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/695/2/900},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0808.0539},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...695..900Y},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Somerville2025,\n author = {{Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Gabrielpillai}, Austen and {Hadzhiyska}, Boryana and {Genel}, Shy},\n title = \"{The relationship between galaxy size and halo properties: insights from the IllustrisTNG simulations and differential clustering}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Galaxy: evolution, Galaxy: formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2026,\n month = jun,\n volume = {548},\n number = {4},\n eid = {stag650},\n pages = {stag650},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stag650},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2502.03679},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026MNRAS.548ag650S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Perez2024,\n author = {{Perez}, Noelia R. and {Pereyra}, Luis A. and {Coldwell}, Georgina and {Alfaro}, Ignacio G. and {Rodriguez}, Facundo and {Ruiz}, Andr{\\'e}s N.},\n title = \"{Evolution of HOD and galaxy properties in filaments and nodes of the cosmic web}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = nov,\n volume = {534},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2228-2243},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae2230},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2405.01671},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534.2228P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Grossauer2015,\n author = {{Grossauer}, Jonathan and {Taylor}, James E. and {Ferrarese}, Laura and {MacArthur}, Lauren A. and {C{\\^o}t{\\'e}}, Patrick and {Roediger}, Joel and {Courteau}, St{\\'e}phane and {Cuillandre}, Jean-Charles and {Duc}, Pierre-Alain and {Durrell}, Patrick R. and {Gwyn}, S.~D.~J. and {Jord{\\'a}n}, Andr{\\'e}s and {Mei}, Simona and {Peng}, Eric W.},\n title = \"{The Next Generation Virgo Cluster Survey. IX. Estimating the Efficiency of Galaxy Formation on the Lowest-mass Scales}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark matter, galaxies: clusters: individual: Virgo, galaxies: dwarf, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = jul,\n volume = {807},\n number = {1},\n eid = {88},\n pages = {88},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/88},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1507.02737},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...807...88G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Gu2016,\n author = {{Gu}, Meng and {Conroy}, Charlie and {Behroozi}, Peter},\n title = \"{Hierarchical Galaxy Growth and Scatter in the Stellar Mass-Halo Mass Relation}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: halos, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = dec,\n volume = {833},\n number = {1},\n eid = {2},\n pages = {2},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/833/1/2},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1602.01099},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...833....2G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Pei2024,\n author = {{Pei}, Wenxiang and {Guo}, Qi and {Shao}, Shi and {He}, Yi and {Gu}, Qing},\n title = \"{Effectiveness of halo and galaxy properties in reducing the scatter in the stellar-to-halo mass relation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jun,\n volume = {531},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2262-2284},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae1319},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2405.15191},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531.2262P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kim2024,\n author = {{Kim}, Stacy Y. and {Read}, Justin I. and {Rey}, Martin P. and {Orkney}, Matthew D.~A. and {Nigudkar}, Sushanta and {Pontzen}, Andrew and {Taylor}, Ethan and {Agertz}, Oscar and {Das}, Payel},\n title = \"{EDGE: predictable scatter in the stellar-mass─halo-mass relation of dwarf galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: dwarf, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: stellar content, galaxies: statistics, galaxies: evolution, dark matter, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2026,\n month = jul,\n volume = {549},\n number = {3},\n eid = {stag825},\n pages = {stag825},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stag825},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2408.15214},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026MNRAS.549ag825K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sunseri2025,\n author = {{Sunseri}, James and {Amon}, Alexandra and {Dunkley}, Jo and {Battaglia}, Nicholas and {Ferraro}, Simone and {Hadzhiyska}, Boryana and {Guachalla}, Bernardita Ried and {Schaan}, Emmanuel},\n title = \"{Disentangling the halo: joint model for measurements of the kinetic Sunyaev─Zeldovich effect and galaxy─galaxy lensing}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: weak, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: cosmic background radiation, cosmology: observations, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2026,\n month = feb,\n volume = {546},\n number = {2},\n eid = {stag031},\n pages = {stag031},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stag031},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2505.20413},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026MNRAS.546ag031S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ade2013,\n author = {{Planck Collaboration} and {Ade}, P.~A.~R. and {Aghanim}, N. and {Arnaud}, M. and {Ashdown}, M. and {Atrio-Barandela}, F. and {Aumont}, J. and {Baccigalupi}, C. and {Balbi}, A. and {Banday}, A.~J. and {Barreiro}, R.~B. and {Barrena}, R. and {Bartlett}, J.~G. and {Battaner}, E. and {Benabed}, K. and {Bernard}, J. -P. and {Bersanelli}, M. and {Bikmaev}, I. and {Bock}, J.~J. and {B{\\\"o}hringer}, H. and {Bonaldi}, A. and {Bond}, J.~R. and {Borrill}, J. and {Bouchet}, F.~R. and {Bourdin}, H. and {Burenin}, R. and {Burigana}, C. and {Butler}, R.~C. and {Cabella}, P. and {Chamballu}, A. and {Chary}, R. -R. and {Chiang}, L. -Y. and {Chon}, G. and {Christensen}, P.~R. and {Clements}, D.~L. and {Colafrancesco}, S. and {Colombi}, S. and {Colombo}, L.~P.~L. and {Comis}, B. and {Coulais}, A. and {Crill}, B.~P. and {Cuttaia}, F. and {Da Silva}, A. and {Dahle}, H. and {Davis}, R.~J. and {de Bernardis}, P. and {de Gasperis}, G. and {de Rosa}, A. and {de Zotti}, G. and {Delabrouille}, J. and {D{\\'e}mocl{\\`e}s}, J. and {Diego}, J.~M. and {Dole}, H. and {Donzelli}, S. and {Dor{\\'e}}, O. and {Douspis}, M. and {Dupac}, X. and {Efstathiou}, G. and {En{\\ss}lin}, T.~A. and {Finelli}, F. and {Flores-Cacho}, I. and {Forni}, O. and {Frailis}, M. and {Franceschi}, E. and {Frommert}, M. and {Galeotta}, S. and {Ganga}, K. and {G{\\'e}nova-Santos}, R.~T. and {Giard}, M. and {Giraud-H{\\'e}raud}, Y. and {Gonz{\\'a}lez-Nuevo}, J. and {G{\\'o}rski}, K.~M. and {Gregorio}, A. and {Gruppuso}, A. and {Hansen}, F.~K. and {Harrison}, D. and {Hern{\\'a}ndez-Monteagudo}, C. and {Herranz}, D. and {Hildebrandt}, S.~R. and {Hivon}, E. and {Hobson}, M. and {Holmes}, W.~A. and {Hornstrup}, A. and {Hovest}, W. and {Huffenberger}, K.~M. and {Hurier}, G. and {Jaffe}, T.~R. and {Jaffe}, A.~H. and {Jones}, W.~C. and {Juvela}, M. and {Keih{\\\"a}nen}, E. and {Keskitalo}, R. and {Khamitov}, I. and {Kisner}, T.~S. and {Kneissl}, R. and {Knoche}, J. and {Kunz}, M. and {Kurki-Suonio}, H. and {L{\\\"a}hteenm{\\\"a}ki}, A. and {Lamarre}, J. -M. and {Lasenby}, A. and {Lawrence}, C.~R. and {Le Jeune}, M. and {Leonardi}, R. and {Lilje}, P.~B. and {Linden-V{\\o}rnle}, M. and {L{\\'o}pez-Caniego}, M. and {Lubin}, P.~M. and {Luzzi}, G. and {Mac{\\'\\i}as-P{\\'e}rez}, J.~F. and {MacTavish}, C.~J. and {Maffei}, B. and {Maino}, D. and {Mandolesi}, N. and {Maris}, M. and {Marleau}, F. and {Marshall}, D.~J. and {Mart{\\'\\i}nez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, E. and {Masi}, S. and {Massardi}, M. and {Matarrese}, S. and {Mazzotta}, P. and {Mei}, S. and {Melchiorri}, A. and {Melin}, J. -B. and {Mendes}, L. and {Mennella}, A. and {Mitra}, S. and {Miville-Desch{\\^e}nes}, M. -A. and {Moneti}, A. and {Montier}, L. and {Morgante}, G. and {Mortlock}, D. and {Munshi}, D. and {Murphy}, J.~A. and {Naselsky}, P. and {Nati}, F. and {Natoli}, P. and {N{\\o}rgaard-Nielsen}, H.~U. and {Noviello}, F. and {Novikov}, D. and {Novikov}, I. and {Osborne}, S. and {Oxborrow}, C.~A. and {Pajot}, F. and {Paoletti}, D. and {Perotto}, L. and {Perrotta}, F. and {Piacentini}, F. and {Piat}, M. and {Pierpaoli}, E. and {Piffaretti}, R. and {Plaszczynski}, S. and {Pointecouteau}, E. and {Polenta}, G. and {Popa}, L. and {Poutanen}, T. and {Pratt}, G.~W. and {Prunet}, S. and {Puget}, J. -L. and {Rachen}, J.~P. and {Rebolo}, R. and {Reinecke}, M. and {Remazeilles}, M. and {Renault}, C. and {Ricciardi}, S. and {Ristorcelli}, I. and {Rocha}, G. and {Roman}, M. and {Rosset}, C. and {Rossetti}, M. and {Rubi{\\~n}o-Mart{\\'\\i}n}, J.~A. and {Rusholme}, B. and {Sandri}, M. and {Savini}, G. and {Scott}, D. and {Spencer}, L. and {Starck}, J. -L. and {Stolyarov}, V. and {Sudiwala}, R. and {Sunyaev}, R. and {Sutton}, D. and {Suur-Uski}, A. -S. and {Sygnet}, J. -F. and {Tauber}, J.~A. and {Terenzi}, L. and {Toffolatti}, L. and {Tomasi}, M. and {Tristram}, M. and {Valenziano}, L. and {Van Tent}, B. and {Vielva}, P. and {Villa}, F. and {Vittorio}, N. and {Wade}, L.~A. and {Wandelt}, B.~D. and {Wang}, W. and {Welikala}, N. and {Weller}, J. and {White}, S.~D.~M.},\n title = \"{Planck intermediate results. XI. The gas content of dark matter halos: the Sunyaev-Zeldovich-stellar mass relation for locally brightest galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, cosmic background radiation, large-scale structure of Universe, galaxies: clusters: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = sep,\n volume = {557},\n eid = {A52},\n pages = {A52},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201220941},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1212.4131},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...557A..52P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Leauthaud2010,\n author = {{Leauthaud}, Alexie and {Finoguenov}, Alexis and {Kneib}, Jean-Paul and {Taylor}, James E. and {Massey}, Richard and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Bundy}, Kevin and {Tinker}, Jeremy and {George}, Matthew R. and {Capak}, Peter and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Johnston}, David E. and {Zhang}, Yu-Ying and {Cappelluti}, Nico and {Ellis}, Richard S. and {Elvis}, Martin and {Giodini}, Stefania and {Heymans}, Catherine and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, Oliver and {Lilly}, Simon and {McCracken}, Henry J. and {Mellier}, Yannick and {R{\\'e}fr{\\'e}gier}, Alexandre and {Salvato}, Mara and {Scoville}, Nick and {Smoot}, George and {Tanaka}, Masayuki and {Van Waerbeke}, Ludovic and {Wolk}, Melody},\n title = \"{A Weak Lensing Study of X-ray Groups in the Cosmos Survey: Form and Evolution of the Mass-Luminosity Relation}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, gravitational lensing, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = jan,\n volume = {709},\n number = {1},\n pages = {97-114},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/97},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0910.5219},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...709...97L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{GuoH2015,\n author = {{Guo}, H. and {Zheng}, Z. and {Jing}, Y.~P. and {Zehavi}, I. and {Li}, C. and {Weinberg}, D.~H. and {Skibba}, R.~A. and {Nichol}, R.~C. and {Rossi}, G. and {Sabiu}, C.~G. and {Schneider}, D.~P. and {McBride}, C.~K.},\n title = \"{Modelling the redshift-space three-point correlation function in SDSS-III.}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: distances and redshifts, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: statistics, cosmology: observations, cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = apr,\n volume = {449},\n pages = {L95-L99},\n doi = {10.1093/mnrasl/slv020},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1409.7389},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449L..95G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Berrier2011,\n author = {{Berrier}, Heather D. and {Barton}, Elizabeth J. and {Berrier}, Joel C. and {Bullock}, James S. and {Zentner}, Andrew R. and {Wechsler}, Risa H.},\n title = \"{Counts-in-cylinders in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey with Comparisons to N-body Simulations}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: theory, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: statistics, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = jan,\n volume = {726},\n number = {1},\n eid = {1},\n pages = {1},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/726/1/1},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1010.5518},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...726....1B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dvornik2023,\n author = {{Dvornik}, Andrej and {Heymans}, Catherine and {Asgari}, Marika and {Mahony}, Constance and {Joachimi}, Benjamin and {Bilicki}, Maciej and {Chisari}, Elisa and {Hildebrandt}, Hendrik and {Hoekstra}, Henk and {Johnston}, Harry and {Kuijken}, Konrad and {Mead}, Alexander and {Miyatake}, Hironao and {Nishimichi}, Takahiro and {Reischke}, Robert and {Unruh}, Sandra and {Wright}, Angus H.},\n title = \"{KiDS-1000: Combined halo-model cosmology constraints from galaxy abundance, galaxy clustering, and galaxy-galaxy lensing}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: weak, methods: statistical, cosmological parameters, galaxies: halos, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = jul,\n volume = {675},\n eid = {A189},\n pages = {A189},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202245158},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2210.03110},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...675A.189D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mandelbaum2006,\n author = {{Mandelbaum}, Rachel and {Seljak}, Uro{\\v{s}} and {Kauffmann}, Guinevere and {Hirata}, Christopher M. and {Brinkmann}, Jonathan},\n title = \"{Galaxy halo masses and satellite fractions from galaxy-galaxy lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: stellar mass, luminosity, morphology and environment dependencies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = may,\n volume = {368},\n number = {2},\n pages = {715-731},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10156.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0511164},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.368..715M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Fischer2000,\n author = {{Fischer}, Philippe and {McKay}, Timothy A. and {Sheldon}, Erin and {Connolly}, Andrew and {Stebbins}, Albert and {Frieman}, Joshua A. and {Jain}, Bhuvnesh and {Joffre}, Michael and {Johnston}, David and {Bernstein}, Gary and {Annis}, James and {Bahcall}, Neta A. and {Brinkmann}, J. and {Carr}, Michael A. and {Csabai}, Istv{\\'a}n and {Gunn}, James E. and {Hennessy}, G.~S. and {Hindsley}, Robert B. and {Hull}, Charles and {Ivezi{\\'c}}, {\\v{Z}}eljko and {Knapp}, G.~R. and {Limmongkol}, Siriluk and {Lupton}, Robert H. and {Munn}, Jeffrey A. and {Nash}, Thomas and {Newberg}, Heidi Jo and {Owen}, Russell and {Pier}, Jeffrey R. and {Rockosi}, Constance M. and {Schneider}, Donald P. and {Smith}, J. Allyn and {Stoughton}, Chris and {Szalay}, Alexander S. and {Szokoly}, Gyula P. and {Thakar}, Aniruddha R. and {Vogeley}, Michael S. and {Waddell}, Patrick and {Weinberg}, David H. and {York}, Donald G. and {SDSS Collaboration}},\n title = \"{Weak Lensing with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Commissioning Data: The Galaxy-Mass Correlation Function to 1 H$^{-1}$ Mpc}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Dark Matter, Galaxies: Fundamental Parameters, Galaxies: Halos, Cosmology: Gravitational Lensing, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2000,\n month = sep,\n volume = {120},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1198-1208},\n doi = {10.1086/301540},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9912119},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....120.1198F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Vale&Ostriker2006,\n author = {{Vale}, A. and {Ostriker}, J.~P.},\n title = \"{The non-parametric model for linking galaxy luminosity with halo/subhalo mass}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: haloes: cosmology: theory: dark matter: large-scale structure of Universe, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = sep,\n volume = {371},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1173-1187},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10605.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0511816},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.371.1173V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Cowie1996,\n author = {{Cowie}, Lennox L. and {Songaila}, Antoinette and {Hu}, Esther M. and {Cohen}, J.~G.},\n title = \"{New Insight on Galaxy Formation and Evolution From Keck Spectroscopy of the Hawaii Deep Fields}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: FORMATION, GALAXIES: EVOLUTION, SURVEYS, Astrophysics},\n year = 1996,\n month = sep,\n volume = {112},\n pages = {839},\n doi = {10.1086/118058},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9606079},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996AJ....112..839C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Behroozi2013a,\n author = {{Behroozi}, Peter S. and {Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Conroy}, Charlie},\n title = \"{On the Lack of Evolution in Galaxy Star Formation Efficiency}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {dark matter, galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = jan,\n volume = {762},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L31},\n pages = {L31},\n doi = {10.1088/2041-8205/762/2/L31},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1209.3013},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...762L..31B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Daddi2022,\n author = {{Daddi}, E. and {Delvecchio}, I. and {Dimauro}, P. and {Magnelli}, B. and {Gomez-Guijarro}, C. and {Coogan}, R. and {Elbaz}, D. and {Kalita}, B.~S. and {Le Bail}, A. and {Rich}, R.~M. and {Tan}, Q.},\n title = \"{The bending of the star-forming main sequence traces the cold- to hot-accretion transition mass over 0 < z < 4}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: halos, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = may,\n volume = {661},\n eid = {L7},\n pages = {L7},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202243574},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2203.10880},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...661L...7D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mashian2016,\n author = {{Mashian}, Natalie and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Loeb}, Abraham},\n title = \"{An empirical model for the galaxy luminosity and star formation rate function at high redshift}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = jan,\n volume = {455},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2101-2109},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv2469},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1507.00999},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455.2101M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mason2015,\n author = {{Mason}, Charlotte A. and {Trenti}, Michele and {Treu}, Tommaso},\n title = \"{The Galaxy UV Luminosity Function before the Epoch of Reionization}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: theory, galaxies: high-redshift, stars: formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = nov,\n volume = {813},\n number = {1},\n eid = {21},\n pages = {21},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/21},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1508.01204},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...813...21M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Conroy2008,\n author = {{Conroy}, Charlie and {Shapley}, Alice E. and {Tinker}, Jeremy L. and {Santos}, Michael R. and {Lemson}, Gerard},\n title = \"{The Varied Fates of z \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde 2 Star-forming Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: halos, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = jun,\n volume = {679},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1192-1203},\n doi = {10.1086/587834},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0711.0001},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...679.1192C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{RodriguezPuebla2024,\n author = {{Rodriguez-Puebla}, Aldo},\n title = \"{The Co-Evolution Between Galaxies and Dark Matter Halos}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = apr,\n eid = {arXiv:2404.10801},\n pages = {arXiv:2404.10801},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2404.10801},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2404.10801},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240410801R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{DeLucia2012,\n author = {{De Lucia}, Gabriella and {Weinmann}, Simone and {Poggianti}, Bianca M. and {Arag{\\'o}n-Salamanca}, Alfonso and {Zaritsky}, Dennis},\n title = \"{The environmental history of group and cluster galaxies in a {\\ensuremath{\\Lambda}} cold dark matter universe}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = jun,\n volume = {423},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1277-1292},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20983.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1111.6590},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423.1277D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Adame2025,\n author = {{Adame}, A.~G. and {Aguilar}, J. and {Ahlen}, S. and {Alam}, S. and {Alexander}, D.~M. and {Alvarez}, M. and {Alves}, O. and {Anand}, A. and {Andrade}, U. and {Armengaud}, E. and {Avila}, S. and {Aviles}, A. and {Awan}, H. and {Bahr-Kalus}, B. and {Bailey}, S. and {Baltay}, C. and {Bault}, A. and {Behera}, J. and {BenZvi}, S. and {Bera}, A. and {Beutler}, F. and {Bianchi}, D. and {Blake}, C. and {Blum}, R. and {Brieden}, S. and {Brodzeller}, A. and {Brooks}, D. and {Buckley-Geer}, E. and {Burtin}, E. and {Calderon}, R. and {Canning}, R. and {Carnero Rosell}, A. and {Cereskaite}, R. and {Cervantes-Cota}, J.~L. and {Chabanier}, S. and {Chaussidon}, E. and {Chaves-Montero}, J. and {Chen}, S. and {Chen}, X. and {Claybaugh}, T. and {Cole}, S. and {Cuceu}, A. and {Davis}, T.~M. and {Dawson}, K. and {de la Macorra}, A. and {de Mattia}, A. and {Deiosso}, N. and {Dey}, A. and {Dey}, B. and {Ding}, Z. and {Doel}, P. and {Edelstein}, J. and {Eftekharzadeh}, S. and {Eisenstein}, D.~J. and {Elliott}, A. and {Fagrelius}, P. and {Fanning}, K. and {Ferraro}, S. and {Ereza}, J. and {Findlay}, N. and {Flaugher}, B. and {Font-Ribera}, A. and {Forero-S{\\'a}nchez}, D. and {Forero-Romero}, J.~E. and {Frenk}, C.~S. and {Garcia-Quintero}, C. and {Gazta{\\~n}aga}, E. and {Gil-Mar{\\'\\i}n}, H. and {Gontcho a Gontcho}, S. and {Gonzalez-Morales}, A.~X. and {Gonzalez-Perez}, V. and {Gordon}, C. and {Green}, D. and {Gruen}, D. and {Gsponer}, R. and {Gutierrez}, G. and {Guy}, J. and {Hadzhiyska}, B. and {Hahn}, C. and {Hanif}, M.~M.~S. and {Herrera-Alcantar}, H.~K. and {Honscheid}, K. and {Howlett}, C. and {Huterer}, D. and {Ir{\\v{s}}i{\\v{c}}}, V. and {Ishak}, M. and {Juneau}, S. and {Kara{\\c{c}}ayl{\\i}}, N.~G. and {Kehoe}, R. and {Kent}, S. and {Kirkby}, D. and {Kremin}, A. and {Krolewski}, A. and {Lai}, Y. and {Lan}, T. -W. and {Landriau}, M. and {Lang}, D. and {Lasker}, J. and {Le Goff}, J.~M. and {Le Guillou}, L. and {Leauthaud}, A. and {Levi}, M.~E. and {Li}, T.~S. and {Linder}, E. and {Lodha}, K. and {Magneville}, C. and {Manera}, M. and {Margala}, D. and {Martini}, P. and {Maus}, M. and {McDonald}, P. and {Medina-Varela}, L. and {Meisner}, A. and {Mena-Fern{\\'a}ndez}, J. and {Miquel}, R. and {Moon}, J. and {Moore}, S. and {Moustakas}, J. and {Mueller}, E. and {Mu{\\~n}oz-Guti{\\'e}rrez}, A. and {Myers}, A.~D. and {Nadathur}, S. and {Napolitano}, L. and {Neveux}, R. and {Newman}, J.~A. and {Nguyen}, N.~M. and {Nie}, J. and {Niz}, G. and {Noriega}, H.~E. and {Padmanabhan}, N. and {Paillas}, E. and {Palanque-Delabrouille}, N. and {Pan}, J. and {Penmetsa}, S. and {Percival}, W.~J. and {Pieri}, M.~M. and {Pinon}, M. and {Poppett}, C. and {Porredon}, A. and {Prada}, F. and {P{\\'e}rez-Fern{\\'a}ndez}, A. and {P{\\'e}rez-R{\\`a}fols}, I. and {Rabinowitz}, D. and {Raichoor}, A. and {Ram{\\'\\i}rez-P{\\'e}rez}, C. and {Ramirez-Solano}, S. and {Rashkovetskyi}, M. and {Ravoux}, C. and {Rezaie}, M. and {Rich}, J. and {Rocher}, A. and {Rockosi}, C. and {Roe}, N.~A. and {Rosado-Marin}, A. and {Ross}, A.~J. and {Rossi}, G. and {Ruggeri}, R. and {Ruhlmann-Kleider}, V. and {Samushia}, L. and {Sanchez}, E. and {Saulder}, C. and {Schlafly}, E.~F. and {Schlegel}, D. and {Schubnell}, M. and {Seo}, H. and {Shafieloo}, A. and {Sharples}, R. and {Silber}, J. and {Slosar}, A. and {Smith}, A. and {Sprayberry}, D. and {Tan}, T. and {Tarl{\\'e}}, G. and {Taylor}, P. and {Trusov}, S. and {Ure{\\~n}a-L{\\'o}pez}, L.~A. and {Vaisakh}, R. and {Valcin}, D. and {Valdes}, F. and {Vargas-Maga{\\~n}a}, M. and {Verde}, L. and {Walther}, M. and {Wang}, B. and {Wang}, M.~S. and {Weaver}, B.~A. and {Weaverdyck}, N. and {Wechsler}, R.~H. and {Weinberg}, D.~H. and {White}, M. and {Yu}, J. and {Yu}, Y. and {Yuan}, S. and {Y{\\`e}che}, C. and {Zaborowski}, E.~A. and {Zarrouk}, P. and {Zhang}, H. and {Zhao}, C. and {Zhao}, R. and {Zhou}, R. and {Zhuang}, T.},\n title = \"{DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations}\",\n journal = {\\jcap},\n keywords = {baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmological parameters from LSS, dark energy experiments, neutrino masses from cosmology, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = feb,\n volume = {2025},\n number = {2},\n eid = {021},\n pages = {021},\n doi = {10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2404.03002},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025JCAP...02..021A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{DESI2025a,\n author = {{DESI Collaboration} and {Abdul Karim}, M. and {Adame}, A.~G. and {Aguado}, D. and {Aguilar}, J. and {Ahlen}, S. and {Alam}, S. and {Aldering}, G. and {Alexander}, D.~M. and {Alfarsy}, R. and {Allen}, L. and {Allende Prieto}, C. and {Alves}, O. and {Anand}, A. and {Andrade}, U. and {Armengaud}, E. and {Avila}, S. and {Aviles}, A. and {Awan}, H. and {Bailey}, S. and {Baleato Lizancos}, A. and {Ballester}, O. and {Bault}, A. and {Bautista}, J. and {Bean}, R. and {Behera}, J. and {BenZvi}, S. and {Beraldo e Silva}, L. and {Bermejo-Climent}, J.~R. and {Beutler}, F. and {Bianchi}, D. and {Blake}, C. and {Blum}, R. and {Bolton}, A.~S. and {Bonici}, M. and {Brieden}, S. and {Brodzeller}, A. and {Brooks}, D. and {Buckley-Geer}, E. and {Burtin}, E. and {Bystr{\\\"o}m}, A. and {Canning}, R. and {Carnero Rosell}, A. and {Carr}, A. and {Carrilho}, P. and {Casas}, L. and {Castander}, F.~J. and {Cereskaite}, R. and {Cervantes-Cota}, J.~L. and {Chaussidon}, E. and {Chaves-Montero}, J. and {Chen}, S. and {Chen}, X. and {Circosta}, C. and {Claybaugh}, T. and {Cole}, S. and {Cooper}, A.~P. and {Cousinou}, M.-C. and {Cuceu}, A. and {Davis}, T.~M. and {Dawson}, K.~S. and {de Belsunce}, R. and {de la Cruz}, R. and {de la Macorra}, A. and {de Mattia}, A. and {Deiosso}, N. and {Della Costa}, J. and {Demina}, R. and {Demirbozan}, U. and {DeRose}, J. and {Dey}, A. and {Dey}, B. and {Ding}, J. and {Ding}, Z. and {Doel}, P. and {Douglass}, K. and {Dowicz}, M. and {Ebina}, H. and {Edelstein}, J. and {Eisenstein}, D.~J. and {Elbers}, W. and {Emas}, N. and {Escoffier}, S. and {Fagrelius}, P. and {Fan}, X. and {Fanning}, K. and {Favole}, G. and {Fawcett}, V.~A. and {Fern{\\'a}ndez-Garc{\\'\\i}a}, E. and {Ferraro}, S. and {Findlay}, N. and {Font-Ribera}, A. and {Forero-Romero}, J.~E. and {Forero-S{\\'a}nchez}, D. and {Frenk}, C.~S. and {G{\\\"a}nsicke}, B.~T. and {Galbany}, L. and {Garc{\\'\\i}a-Bellido}, J. and {Garcia-Quintero}, C. and {Garrison}, L.~H. and {Gazta{\\~n}aga}, E. and {Gil-Mar{\\'\\i}n}, H. and {Gloudemans}, A. and {Gnedin}, O.~Y. and {Gontcho A Gontcho}, S. and {Gonzalez}, D. and {Gonzalez-Morales}, A.~X. and {Gonzalez-Perez}, V. and {Gordon}, C. and {Graur}, O. and {Green}, D. and {Gruen}, D. and {Gsponer}, R. and {Guandalin}, C. and {Gutierrez}, G. and {Guy}, J. and {Hahn}, C. and {Han}, J.~J. and {Han}, J. and {He}, S. and {Herrera-Alcantar}, H.~K. and {Heydenreich}, S. and {Honscheid}, K. and {Hou}, J. and {Howlett}, C. and {Huterer}, D. and {Ir{\\v{s}}i{\\v{c}}}, V. and {Ishak}, M. and {Jacques}, A. and {Jiang}, L. and {Jimenez}, J. and {Jing}, Y.~P. and {Joachimi}, B. and {Joudaki}, S. and {Joyce}, R. and {Jullo}, E. and {Juneau}, S. and {Kara{\\c{c}}ayl{\\i}}, N.~G. and {Karim}, T. and {Kehoe}, R. and {Kent}, S. and {Khederlarian}, A. and {Kirkby}, D. and {Kisner}, T. and {Kitaura}, F.-S. and {Kizhuprakkat}, N. and {Kong}, H. and {Koposov}, S.~E. and {Kremin}, A. and {Krolewski}, A. and {Lahav}, O. and {Lai}, Y. and {Lamman}, C. and {Lan}, T.-W. and {Landriau}, M. and {Lang}, D. and {Lange}, J.~U. and {Lasker}, J. and {Le Goff}, J.~M. and {Le Guillou}, L. and {Leauthaud}, A. and {Levi}, M.~E. and {Li}, S. and {Li}, T.~S. and {Liu}, W. and {Lodha}, K. and {Lokken}, M. and {Luo}, Y. and {Magneville}, C. and {Manera}, M. and {Manser}, C.~J. and {Margala}, D. and {Martini}, P. and {Maus}, M. and {McCullough}, J. and {McDonald}, P. and {Medina}, G.~E. and {Medina-Varela}, L. and {Meisner}, A. and {Mena-Fern{\\'a}ndez}, J. and {Menegas}, A. and {Meneses-Rizo}, J. and {Mezcua}, M. and {Miquel}, R. and {Montero-Camacho}, P. and {Moon}, J. and {Moustakas}, J. and {Mu{\\~n}oz-Guti{\\'e}rrez}, A. and {Mu noz-Santos}, D. and {Myers}, A.~D. and {Myles}, J. and {Nadathur}, S. and {Najita}, J. and {Napolitano}, L. and {Newman}, J.~A. and {Nikakhtar}, F. and {Nikutta}, R. and {Niz}, G. and {Noriega}, H.~E. and {Nugent}, P.},\n title = \"{Data Release 1 of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Redshift surveys, Astronomy data reduction, Sky surveys, Astronomy databases, Astronomy data analysis, Observational astronomy, 1378, 1861, 1464, 83, 1858, 1145, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2026,\n month = may,\n volume = {171},\n number = {5},\n eid = {285},\n pages = {285},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-3881/ae4c43},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2503.14745},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026AJ....171..285D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dekel2013,\n author = {{Dekel}, A. and {Zolotov}, A. and {Tweed}, D. and {Cacciato}, M. and {Ceverino}, D. and {Primack}, J.~R.},\n title = \"{Toy models for galaxy formation versus simulations}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, dark matter, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = oct,\n volume = {435},\n number = {2},\n pages = {999-1019},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt1338},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1303.3009},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.435..999D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Vujeva2024,\n author = {{Vujeva}, Luka and {Steinhardt}, Charles L. and {Jespersen}, Christian Kragh and {Frye}, Brenda L. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Natarajan}, Priyamvada and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Hibon}, Pascale and {Furtak}, Lukas J. and {Atek}, Hakim and {Cen}, Renyue and {Sneppen}, Albert},\n title = \"{Efficient Survey Design for Finding High-redshift Galaxies with JWST}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies, High-redshift galaxies, Galaxy clusters, Abell clusters, Rich galaxy clusters, Large-scale structure of the universe, Cosmology, 573, 734, 584, 9, 2005, 902, 343, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = oct,\n volume = {974},\n number = {1},\n eid = {23},\n pages = {23},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad639d},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2310.15284},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...974...23V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Jespersen2022,\n author = {{Jespersen}, Christian Kragh and {Cranmer}, Miles and {Melchior}, Peter and {Ho}, Shirley and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Gabrielpillai}, Austen},\n title = \"{Mangrove: Learning Galaxy Properties from Merger Trees}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies, Astrostatistics, Algorithms, Hydrodynamical simulations, N-body simulations, Neural networks, 573, 1882, 1883, 767, 1083, 1933, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Computer Science - Machine Learning},\n year = 2022,\n month = dec,\n volume = {941},\n number = {1},\n eid = {7},\n pages = {7},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac9b18},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2210.13473},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...941....7J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Chuang2024,\n author = {{Chuang}, Chen-Yu and {Jespersen}, Christian Kragh and {Lin}, Yen-Ting and {Ho}, Shirley and {Genel}, Shy},\n title = \"{Leaving No Branches Behind: Predicting Baryonic Properties of Galaxies from Merger Trees}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy formation, Galaxy physics, Galaxy dark matter halos, Astrostatistics, Neural networks, 595, 612, 1880, 1882, 1933, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = apr,\n volume = {965},\n number = {2},\n eid = {101},\n pages = {101},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad2b6c},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2311.09162},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...965..101C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{vandenBosch2013,\n author = {{van den Bosch}, Frank C. and {More}, Surhud and {Cacciato}, Marcello and {Mo}, Houjun and {Yang}, Xiaohu},\n title = \"{Cosmological constraints from a combination of galaxy clustering and lensing - I. Theoretical framework}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: haloes, cosmological parameters, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = apr,\n volume = {430},\n number = {2},\n pages = {725-746},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sts006},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1206.6890},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430..725V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{GalarragaEspinosa2024,\n author = {{Gal{\\'a}rraga-Espinosa}, Daniela and {Cadiou}, Corentin and {Gouin}, C{\\'e}line and {White}, Simon D.~M. and {Springel}, Volker and {Pakmor}, R{\\\"u}diger and {Hadzhiyska}, Boryana and {Bose}, Sownak and {Ferlito}, Fulvio and {Hernquist}, Lars and {Kannan}, Rahul and {Barrera}, Monica and {Maria Delgado}, Ana and {Hern{\\'a}ndez-Aguayo}, C{\\'e}sar},\n title = \"{Evolution of cosmic filaments in the MTNG simulation}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, methods: statistical, galaxies: clusters: general, cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = apr,\n volume = {684},\n eid = {A63},\n pages = {A63},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202347982},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2309.08659},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684A..63G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{White&Frenk1991,\n author = {{White}, Simon D.~M. and {Frenk}, Carlos S.},\n title = \"{Galaxy Formation through Hierarchical Clustering}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galactic Clusters, Galactic Evolution, Galactic Structure, Star Distribution, Star Formation, Analytic Functions, Brightness Distribution, Cosmology, Dark Matter, Halos, Numerical Analysis, Astrophysics, GALAXIES: CLUSTERING, GALAXIES: FORMATION, GALAXIES: STELLAR CONTENT, GALAXIES: STRUCTURE},\n year = 1991,\n month = sep,\n volume = {379},\n pages = {52},\n doi = {10.1086/170483},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...379...52W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Conroy&Wechsler2009,\n author = {{Conroy}, Charlie and {Wechsler}, Risa H.},\n title = \"{Connecting Galaxies, Halos, and Star Formation Rates Across Cosmic Time}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: theory, dark matter, galaxies: formation, galaxies: halos, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = may,\n volume = {696},\n number = {1},\n pages = {620-635},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/620},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0805.3346},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696..620C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Rodriguez-Gomez2017,\n author = {{Rodriguez-Gomez}, Vicente and {Sales}, Laura V. and {Genel}, Shy and {Pillepich}, Annalisa and {Zjupa}, Jolanta and {Nelson}, Dylan and {Griffen}, Brendan and {Torrey}, Paul and {Snyder}, Gregory F. and {Vogelsberger}, Mark and {Springel}, Volker and {Ma}, Chung-Pei and {Hernquist}, Lars},\n title = \"{The role of mergers and halo spin in shaping galaxy morphology}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2017,\n month = may,\n volume = {467},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3083-3098},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx305},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1609.09498},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.3083R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kaiser1984,\n author = {{Kaiser}, N.},\n title = \"{On the spatial correlations of Abell clusters.}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Correlation, Cosmology, Galactic Clusters, Spatial Distribution, Astronomical Models, Density Distribution, Normal Density Functions, Astrophysics},\n year = 1984,\n month = sep,\n volume = {284},\n pages = {L9-L12},\n doi = {10.1086/184341},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984ApJ...284L...9K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{NFW1997,\n author = {{Navarro}, Julio F. and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {White}, Simon D.~M.},\n title = \"{A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Cosmology: Dark Matter, Galaxies: Halos, Methods: Numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 1997,\n month = dec,\n volume = {490},\n number = {2},\n pages = {493-508},\n doi = {10.1086/304888},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9611107},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...490..493N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Duffy08,\n author = {{Duffy}, Alan R. and {Schaye}, Joop and {Kay}, Scott T. and {Dalla Vecchia}, Claudio},\n title = \"{Dark matter halo concentrations in the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe year 5 cosmology}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: N-body simulations, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: haloes, cosmological parameters, cosmology: theory, dark matter, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = oct,\n volume = {390},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L64-L68},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00537.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0804.2486},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.390L..64D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Behroozi2013c,\n author = {{Behroozi}, Peter S. and {Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Conroy}, Charlie},\n title = \"{The Average Star Formation Histories of Galaxies in Dark Matter Halos from z = 0-8}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark matter, galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = jun,\n volume = {770},\n number = {1},\n eid = {57},\n pages = {57},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/57},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1207.6105},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...770...57B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Limber1954,\n author = {{Limber}, D. Nelson},\n title = \"{The Analysis of Counts of the Extragalactic Nebulae in Terms of a Fluctuating Density Field. II.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1954,\n month = may,\n volume = {119},\n pages = {655},\n doi = {10.1086/145870},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1954ApJ...119..655L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{ValeOstriker06,\n author = {{Vale}, A. and {Ostriker}, J.~P.},\n title = \"{The non-parametric model for linking galaxy luminosity with halo/subhalo mass}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: haloes: cosmology: theory: dark matter: large-scale structure of Universe, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = sep,\n volume = {371},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1173-1187},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10605.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0511816},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.371.1173V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Munoz23,\n author = {{Mu{\\~n}oz}, Julian B. and {Mirocha}, Jordan and {Furlanetto}, Steven and {Sabti}, Nashwan},\n title = \"{Breaking degeneracies in the first galaxies with clustering}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: high-redshift, intergalactic medium, dark ages, reionization, first stars, diffuse radiation, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = nov,\n volume = {526},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L47-L55},\n doi = {10.1093/mnrasl/slad115},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2306.09403},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526L..47M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Gelli24,\n author = {{Gelli}, Viola and {Mason}, Charlotte and {Hayward}, Christopher C.},\n title = \"{The Impact of Mass-dependent Stochasticity at Cosmic Dawn}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {High-redshift galaxies, Galaxy evolution, Cosmology, 734, 594, 343, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = nov,\n volume = {975},\n number = {2},\n eid = {192},\n pages = {192},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad7b36},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2405.13108},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975..192G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Trenti10_dutycycle,\n author = {{Trenti}, M. and {Stiavelli}, M. and {Bouwens}, R.~J. and {Oesch}, P. and {Shull}, J.~M. and {Illingworth}, G.~D. and {Bradley}, L.~D. and {Carollo}, C.~M.},\n title = \"{The Galaxy Luminosity Function During the Reionization Epoch}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {cosmology: theory, early universe, galaxies: high-redshift, stars: formation, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = may,\n volume = {714},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L202-L207},\n doi = {10.1088/2041-8205/714/2/L202},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1004.0384},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...714L.202T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{MeadVerde21,\n author = {{Mead}, A.~J. and {Verde}, L.},\n title = \"{Including beyond-linear halo bias in halo models}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2021,\n month = may,\n volume = {503},\n number = {2},\n pages = {3095-3111},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stab748},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2011.08858},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503.3095M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sun2023a,\n author = {{Sun}, Guochao and {Faucher-Gigu{\\`e}re}, Claude-Andr{\\'e} and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {Shen}, Xuejian and {Wetzel}, Andrew and {Cochrane}, Rachel K.},\n title = \"{Bursty Star Formation Naturally Explains the Abundance of Bright Galaxies at Cosmic Dawn}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Galaxy formation, Star formation, High-redshift galaxies, 595, 1569, 734, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = oct,\n volume = {955},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L35},\n pages = {L35},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/acf85a},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2307.15305},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...955L..35S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sun2023b,\n author = {{Sun}, Guochao and {Faucher-Gigu{\\`e}re}, Claude-Andr{\\'e} and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {Shen}, Xuejian},\n title = \"{Seen and unseen: bursty star formation and its implications for observations of high-redshift galaxies with JWST}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = dec,\n volume = {526},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2665-2672},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad2902},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2305.02713},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526.2665S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mead15,\n author = {{Mead}, A.~J. and {Peacock}, J.~A. and {Heymans}, C. and {Joudaki}, S. and {Heavens}, A.~F.},\n title = \"{An accurate halo model for fitting non-linear cosmological power spectra and baryonic feedback models}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: weak, cosmology: theory, dark energy, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = dec,\n volume = {454},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1958-1975},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv2036},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1505.07833},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.1958M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Hamana01,\n author = {{Hamana}, Takashi and {Yoshida}, Naoki and {Suto}, Yasushi and {Evrard}, August E.},\n title = \"{Clustering of Dark Matter Halos on the Light Cone: Scale, Time, and Mass Dependence of the Halo Biasing in the Hubble Volume Simulations}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Cosmology: Dark Matter, Galaxies: Halos, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Methods: Numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 2001,\n month = nov,\n volume = {561},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L143-L146},\n doi = {10.1086/324677},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0110061},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...561L.143H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dekel23_FFB,\n author = {{Dekel}, Avishai and {Sarkar}, Kartick C. and {Birnboim}, Yuval and {Mandelker}, Nir and {Li}, Zhaozhou},\n title = \"{Efficient formation of massive galaxies at cosmic dawn by feedback-free starbursts}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: star clusters: general, galaxies: star formation, early Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = aug,\n volume = {523},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3201-3218},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad1557},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2303.04827},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.3201D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Li23_FFB,\n author = {{Li}, Zhaozhou and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Sarkar}, Kartick C. and {Aung}, Han and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Mandelker}, Nir and {Tacchella}, Sandro},\n title = \"{Feedback-free starbursts at cosmic dawn: Observable predictions for JWST}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: halos, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: ISM, galaxies: starburst, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = oct,\n volume = {690},\n eid = {A108},\n pages = {A108},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202348727},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2311.14662},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...690A.108L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{MirochaFurlanetto23,\n author = {{Mirocha}, Jordan and {Furlanetto}, Steven R.},\n title = \"{Balancing the efficiency and stochasticity of star formation with dust extinction in z {\\ensuremath{\\gtrsim}} 10 galaxies observed by JWST}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, diffuse radiation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = feb,\n volume = {519},\n number = {1},\n pages = {843-853},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac3578},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2208.12826},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519..843M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{loeb24,\n author = {{Loeb}, Abraham},\n title = \"{Little Red Dots from Low-spin Galaxies at High Redshifts}\",\n journal = {Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society},\n keywords = {Compact galaxies, AGN host galaxies, 285, 2017, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = jul,\n volume = {8},\n number = {7},\n eid = {182},\n pages = {182},\n doi = {10.3847/2515-5172/ad614c},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2407.12965},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024RNAAS...8..182L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Andalman2024,\n author = {{Andalman}, Zachary L. and {Teyssier}, Romain and {Dekel}, Avishai},\n title = \"{On the origin of the high star formation efficiency in massive galaxies at Cosmic Dawn}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {software: simulations, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = jul,\n volume = {540},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3350-3383},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staf930},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2410.20530},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.540.3350A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{BoylanKolchin24,\n author = {{Boylan-Kolchin}, Michael},\n title = \"{Accelerated by dark matter: a high-redshift pathway to efficient galaxy-scale star formation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics of Galaxies, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = apr,\n volume = {538},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3210-3218},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staf471},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2407.10900},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.538.3210B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{renzini25,\n author = {{Renzini}, Alvio},\n title = \"{On the ubiquity of extreme baryon concentrations in the early Universe}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = jan,\n volume = {536},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L8-L12},\n doi = {10.1093/mnrasl/slae101},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2410.22138},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536L...8R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{KravtsovBelokurov24,\n author = {{Kravtsov}, Andrey and {Belokurov}, Vasily},\n title = \"{Stochastic star formation and the abundance of $z>10$ UV-bright galaxies}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = may,\n eid = {arXiv:2405.04578},\n pages = {arXiv:2405.04578},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2405.04578},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2405.04578},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240504578K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Lilly13,\n author = {{Lilly}, Simon J. and {Carollo}, C. Marcella and {Pipino}, Antonio and {Renzini}, Alvio and {Peng}, Yingjie},\n title = \"{Gas Regulation of Galaxies: The Evolution of the Cosmic Specific Star Formation Rate, the Metallicity-Mass-Star-formation Rate Relation, and the Stellar Content of Halos}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark matter, galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: halos, galaxies: ISM, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = aug,\n volume = {772},\n number = {2},\n eid = {119},\n pages = {119},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/119},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1303.5059},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...772..119L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Behroozi19,\n author = {{Behroozi}, Peter and {Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Hearin}, Andrew P. and {Conroy}, Charlie},\n title = \"{UNIVERSEMACHINE: The correlation between galaxy growth and dark matter halo assembly from z = 0-10}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = sep,\n volume = {488},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3143-3194},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz1182},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1806.07893},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.3143B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Behroozi10,\n author = {{Behroozi}, Peter S. and {Conroy}, Charlie and {Wechsler}, Risa H.},\n title = \"{A Comprehensive Analysis of Uncertainties Affecting the Stellar Mass-Halo Mass Relation for 0 < z < 4}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark matter, galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = jul,\n volume = {717},\n number = {1},\n pages = {379-403},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/379},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1001.0015},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...717..379B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Pei24,\n author = {{Pei}, Wenxiang and {Guo}, Qi and {Shao}, Shi and {He}, Yi and {Gu}, Qing},\n title = \"{Effectiveness of halo and galaxy properties in reducing the scatter in the stellar-to-halo mass relation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jun,\n volume = {531},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2262-2284},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae1319},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2405.15191},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531.2262P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Matthee17,\n author = {{Matthee}, Jorryt and {Schaye}, Joop and {Crain}, Robert A. and {Schaller}, Matthieu and {Bower}, Richard and {Theuns}, Tom},\n title = \"{The origin of scatter in the stellar mass-halo mass relation of central galaxies in the EAGLE simulation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2017,\n month = feb,\n volume = {465},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2381-2396},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw2884},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1608.08218},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.2381M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Zheng07,\n author = {{Zheng}, Zheng and {Coil}, Alison L. and {Zehavi}, Idit},\n title = \"{Galaxy Evolution from Halo Occupation Distribution Modeling of DEEP2 and SDSS Galaxy Clustering}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Galaxies: Distances and Redshifts, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Halos, Galaxies: Statistics, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = oct,\n volume = {667},\n number = {2},\n pages = {760-779},\n doi = {10.1086/521074},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0703457},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...667..760Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Chiang17,\n author = {{Chiang}, Yi-Kuan and {Overzier}, Roderik A. and {Gebhardt}, Karl and {Henriques}, Bruno},\n title = \"{Galaxy Protoclusters as Drivers of Cosmic Star Formation History in the First 2 Gyr}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2017,\n month = aug,\n volume = {844},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L23},\n pages = {L23},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/aa7e7b},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1705.01634},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...844L..23C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n%---------------------------------- Results JWST or others -----------------------\n@ARTICLE{Arita2025,\n author = {{Arita}, Junya and {Kashikawa}, Nobunari and {Onoue}, Masafusa and {Yoshioka}, Takehiro and {Takeda}, Yoshihiro and {Hoshi}, Hiroki and {Shimizu}, Shunta},\n title = \"{The nature of low-luminosity AGNs discovered by JWST based on clustering analysis: progenitors of low-z quasars?}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = feb,\n volume = {536},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3677-3688},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae2765},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2410.08707},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536.3677A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Pizzati2025,\n author = {{Pizzati}, Elia and {Hennawi}, Joseph F. and {Schaye}, Joop and {Eilers}, Anna-Christina and {Huang}, Jiamu and {Schindler}, Jan-Torge and {Wang}, Feige},\n title = \"{'Little red dots' cannot reside in the same dark matter haloes as comparably luminous unobscured quasars}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: high-redshift, quasars: general, quasars: supermassive black holes, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics of Galaxies, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = jun,\n volume = {539},\n number = {4},\n pages = {2910-2925},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staf660},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2409.18208},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.539.2910P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Pizzati2024,\n author = {{Pizzati}, Elia and {Hennawi}, Joseph F. and {Schaye}, Joop and {Schaller}, Matthieu and {Eilers}, Anna-Christina and {Wang}, Feige and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {Elbers}, Willem and {Helly}, John C. and {Mackenzie}, Ruari and {Matthee}, Jorryt and {Bordoloi}, Rongmon and {Kashino}, Daichi and {Naidu}, Rohan P. and {Yue}, Minghao},\n title = \"{A unified model for the clustering of quasars and galaxies at z {\\ensuremath{\\approx}} 6}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics of Galaxies, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = nov,\n volume = {534},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3155-3175},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae2307},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2403.12140},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534.3155P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kartaltepe2023,\n author = {{Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Rose}, Caitlin and {Vanderhoof}, Brittany N. and {McGrath}, Elizabeth J. and {Costantin}, Luca and {Cox}, Isabella G. and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Wuyts}, Stijn and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Amor{\\'\\i}n}, Ricardo O. and {Andrews}, Brett H. and {Arrabal Haro}, Pablo and {Backhaus}, Bren E. and {Behroozi}, Peter and {Bisigello}, Laura and {Calabr{\\`o}}, Antonello and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Coogan}, Rosemary T. and {Cooper}, M.~C. and {Croton}, Darren and {de la Vega}, Alexander and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Grazian}, Andrea and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Hathi}, Nimish P. and {Holwerda}, Benne W. and {Huertas-Company}, Marc and {Iyer}, Kartheik G. and {Jogee}, Shardha and {Jung}, Intae and {Kewley}, Lisa J. and {Kirkpatrick}, Allison and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Liu}, James and {Lotz}, Jennifer M. and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {Newman}, Jeffrey A. and {Pacifici}, Camilla and {Pandya}, Viraj and {Papovich}, Casey and {Pentericci}, Laura and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Petersen}, Jayse and {Pirzkal}, Nor and {Rafelski}, Marc and {Ravindranath}, Swara and {Simons}, Raymond C. and {Snyder}, Gregory F. and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Stanway}, Elizabeth R. and {Straughn}, Amber N. and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {Vega-Ferrero}, Jes{\\'u}s and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Yang}, Guang and {Zavala}, Jorge A.},\n title = \"{CEERS Key Paper. III. The Diversity of Galaxy Structure and Morphology at z = 3-9 with JWST}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy classification systems, Galaxies, Disk galaxies, Irregular galaxies, Hubble classification scheme, 594, 582, 573, 391, 864, 757, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = mar,\n volume = {946},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L15},\n pages = {L15},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/acad01},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2210.14713},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...946L..15K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hamadouche2024,\n author = {{Hamadouche}, M.~L. and {McLure}, R.~J. and {Carnall}, A.~C. and {McLeod}, D.~J. and {Dunlop}, J.~S. and {Whitaker}, K.~E. and {Donnan}, C.~T. and {Begley}, R. and {Stanton}, T.~M. and {Almaini}, O. and {Aird}, J. and {Cullen}, F. and {Cutler}, S. and {Grogin}, N.~A. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M.},\n title = \"{JWST PRIMER: strong evidence for the environmental quenching of low-mass galaxies out to z≃ 2}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: photometry, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = jul,\n volume = {541},\n number = {1},\n pages = {463-475},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staf971},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2412.09592},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.541..463H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Li2025,\n author = {{Li}, Qiong and {Conselice}, Christopher J. and {Sarron}, Florian and {Harvey}, Thomas and {Austin}, Duncan and {Adams}, Nathan and {Trussler}, James A.~A. and {Duan}, Qiao and {Ferreira}, Leonardo and {Westcott}, Lewi and {Harris}, Honor and {Dole}, Herv{\\'e} and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Frye}, Brenda and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Robertson}, Clayton and {Windhorst}, Rogier A. and {Polletta}, Maria del Carmen and {Hathi}, Nimish P. and {Jansen}, Rolf A.},\n title = \"{EPOCHS paper {\\textendash} X. Environmental effects on Galaxy formation and protocluster Galaxy candidates at 4.5 < z < 10 from JWST observations}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: general, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: photometry, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = may,\n volume = {539},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1796-1819},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staf543},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2405.17359},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.539.1796L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Gardner2006,\n author = {{Gardner}, Jonathan P. and {Mather}, John C. and {Clampin}, Mark and {Doyon}, Rene and {Greenhouse}, Matthew A. and {Hammel}, Heidi B. and {Hutchings}, John B. and {Jakobsen}, Peter and {Lilly}, Simon J. and {Long}, Knox S. and {Lunine}, Jonathan I. and {McCaughrean}, Mark J. and {Mountain}, Matt and {Nella}, John and {Rieke}, George H. and {Rieke}, Marcia J. and {Rix}, Hans-Walter and {Smith}, Eric P. and {Sonneborn}, George and {Stiavelli}, Massimo and {Stockman}, H.~S. and {Windhorst}, Rogier A. and {Wright}, Gillian S.},\n title = \"{The James Webb Space Telescope}\",\n journal = {\\ssr},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, infrared: general, planetary systems, space vehicles: instruments, stars: formation, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = apr,\n volume = {123},\n number = {4},\n pages = {485-606},\n doi = {10.1007/s11214-006-8315-7},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0606175},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006SSRv..123..485G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Gardner2023,\n author = {{Gardner}, Jonathan P. and {Mather}, John C. and {Abbott}, Randy and {Abell}, James S. and {Abernathy}, Mark and {Abney}, Faith E. and {Abraham}, John G. and {Abraham}, Roberto and {Abul-Huda}, Yasin M. and {Acton}, Scott and {Adams}, Cynthia K. and {Adams}, Evan and {Adler}, David S. and {Adriaensen}, Maarten and {Aguilar}, Jonathan Albert and {Ahmed}, Mansoor and {Ahmed}, Nasif S. and {Ahmed}, Tanjira and {Albat}, R{\\\"u}deger and {Albert}, Lo{\\\"\\i}c and {Alberts}, Stacey and {Aldridge}, David and {Allen}, Mary Marsha and {Allen}, Shaune S. and {Altenburg}, Martin and {Altunc}, Serhat and {Alvarez}, Jose Lorenzo and {{\\'A}lvarez-M{\\'a}rquez}, Javier and {Alves de Oliveira}, Catarina and {Ambrose}, Leslie L. and {Anandakrishnan}, Satya M. and {Andersen}, Gregory C. and {Anderson}, Harry James and {Anderson}, Jay and {Anderson}, Kristen and {Anderson}, Sara M. and {Aprea}, Julio and {Archer}, Benita J. and {Arenberg}, Jonathan W. and {Argyriou}, Ioannis and {Arribas}, Santiago and {Artigau}, {\\'E}tienne and {Arvai}, Amanda Rose and {Atcheson}, Paul and {Atkinson}, Charles B. and {Averbukh}, Jesse and {Aymergen}, Cagatay and {Bacinski}, John J. and {Baggett}, Wayne E. and {Bagnasco}, Giorgio and {Baker}, Lynn L. and {Balzano}, Vicki Ann and {Banks}, Kimberly A. and {Baran}, David A. and {Barker}, Elizabeth A. and {Barrett}, Larry K. and {Barringer}, Bruce O. and {Barto}, Allison and {Bast}, William and {Baudoz}, Pierre and {Baum}, Stefi and {Beatty}, Thomas G. and {Beaulieu}, Mathilde and {Bechtold}, Kathryn and {Beck}, Tracy and {Beddard}, Megan M. and {Beichman}, Charles and {Bellagama}, Larry and {Bely}, Pierre and {Berger}, Timothy W. and {Bergeron}, Louis E. and {Bernier}, Antoine-Darveau and {Bertch}, Maria D. and {Beskow}, Charlotte and {Betz}, Laura E. and {Biagetti}, Carl P. and {Birkmann}, Stephan and {Bjorklund}, Kurt F. and {Blackwood}, James D. and {Blazek}, Ronald Paul and {Blossfeld}, Stephen and {Bluth}, Marcel and {Boccaletti}, Anthony and {Boegner}, Jr., Martin E. and {Bohlin}, Ralph C. and {Boia}, John Joseph and {B{\\\"o}ker}, Torsten and {Bonaventura}, N. and {Bond}, Nicholas A. and {Bosley}, Kari Ann and {Boucarut}, Rene A. and {Bouchet}, Patrice and {Bouwman}, Jeroen and {Bower}, Gary and {Bowers}, Ariel S. and {Bowers}, Charles W. and {Boyce}, Leslye A. and {Boyer}, Christine T. and {Boyer}, Martha L. and {Boyer}, Michael and {Boyer}, Robert and {Bradley}, Larry D. and {Brady}, Gregory R. and {Brandl}, Bernhard R. and {Brannen}, Judith L. and {Breda}, David and {Bremmer}, Harold G. and {Brennan}, David and {Bresnahan}, Pamela A. and {Bright}, Stacey N. and {Broiles}, Brian J. and {Bromenschenkel}, Asa and {Brooks}, Brian H. and {Brooks}, Keira J. and {Brown}, Bob and {Brown}, Bruce and {Brown}, Thomas M. and {Bruce}, Barry W. and {Bryson}, Jonathan G. and {Bujanda}, Edwin D. and {Bullock}, Blake M. and {Bunker}, A.~J. and {Bureo}, Rafael and {Burt}, Irving J. and {Bush}, James Aaron and {Bushouse}, Howard A. and {Bussman}, Marie C. and {Cabaud}, Olivier and {Cale}, Steven and {Calhoon}, Charles D. and {Calvani}, Humberto and {Canipe}, Alicia M. and {Caputo}, Francis M. and {Cara}, Mihai and {Carey}, Larkin and {Case}, Michael Eli and {Cesari}, Thaddeus and {Cetorelli}, Lee D. and {Chance}, Don R. and {Chandler}, Lynn and {Chaney}, Dave and {Chapman}, George N. and {Charlot}, S. and {Chayer}, Pierre and {Cheezum}, Jeffrey I. and {Chen}, Bin and {Chen}, Christine H. and {Cherinka}, Brian and {Chichester}, Sarah C. and {Chilton}, Zachary S. and {Chittiraibalan}, Dharini and {Clampin}, Mark and {Clark}, Charles R. and {Clark}, Kerry W. and {Clark}, Stephanie M. and {Claybrooks}, Edward E. and {Cleveland}, Keith A. and {Cohen}, Andrew L. and {Cohen}, Lester M. and {Col{\\'o}n}, Knicole D. and {Coleman}, Benee L. and {Colina}, Luis and {Comber}, Brian J. and {Comeau}, Thomas M. and {Comer}, Thomas and {Conde Reis}, Alain and {Connolly}, Dennis C. and {Conroy}, Kyle E. and {Contos}, Adam R. and {Contreras}, James and {Cook}, Neil J. and {Cooper}, James L. and {Cooper}, Rachel Aviva and {Correia}, Michael F. and {Correnti}, Matteo and {Cossou}, Christophe and {Costanza}, Brian F. and {Coulais}, Alain and {Cox}, Colin R. and {Coyle}, Ray T. and {Cracraft}, Misty M. and {Crew}, Keith A. and {Curtis}, Gary J. and {Cusveller}, Bianca and {Da Costa Maciel}, Cleyciane and {Dailey}, Christopher T. and {Daugeron}, Fr{\\'e}d{\\'e}ric and {Davidson}, Greg S. and {Davies}, James E. and {Davis}, Katherine Anne and {Davis}, Michael S. and {Day}, Ratna and {de Chambure}, Daniel and {de Jong}, Pauline and {De Marchi}, Guido and {Dean}, Bruce H. and {Decker}, John E. and {Delisa}, Amy S. and {Dell}, Lawrence C. and {Dellagatta}, Gail},\n title = \"{The James Webb Space Telescope Mission}\",\n journal = {\\pasp},\n keywords = {Space vehicle instruments, Astronomical instrumentation, Infrared astronomy, Infrared observatories, Space observatories, History of astronomy, 1548, 799, 786, 791, 1543, 1868, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = jun,\n volume = {135},\n number = {1048},\n eid = {068001},\n pages = {068001},\n doi = {10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2304.04869},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135f8001G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Rieke2023,\n author = {{Rieke}, Marcia J. and {Kelly}, Douglas M. and {Misselt}, Karl and {Stansberry}, John and {Boyer}, Martha and {Beatty}, Thomas and {Egami}, Eiichi and {Florian}, Michael and {Greene}, Thomas P. and {Hainline}, Kevin and {Leisenring}, Jarron and {Roellig}, Thomas and {Schlawin}, Everett and {Sun}, Fengwu and {Tinnin}, Lee and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Willmer}, Christopher N.~A. and {Wilson}, Debra and {Clark}, Charles R. and {Rohrbach}, Scott and {Brooks}, Brian and {Canipe}, Alicia and {Correnti}, Matteo and {DiFelice}, Audrey and {Gennaro}, Mario and {Girard}, Julien H. and {Hartig}, George and {Hilbert}, Bryan and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Nikolov}, Nikolay K. and {Pirzkal}, Norbert and {Rest}, Armin and {Robberto}, Massimo and {Sunnquist}, Ben and {Telfer}, Randal and {Wu}, Chi Rai and {Ferry}, Malcolm and {Lewis}, Dan and {Baum}, Stefi and {Beichman}, Charles and {Doyon}, Ren{\\'e} and {Dressler}, Alan and {Eisenstein}, Daniel J. and {Ferrarese}, Laura and {Hodapp}, Klaus and {Horner}, Scott and {Jaffe}, Daniel T. and {Johnstone}, Doug and {Krist}, John and {Martin}, Peter and {McCarthy}, Donald W. and {Meyer}, Michael and {Rieke}, George H. and {Trauger}, John and {Young}, Erick T.},\n title = \"{Performance of NIRCam on JWST in Flight}\",\n journal = {\\pasp},\n keywords = {Infrared telescopes, Space observatories, Space telescopes, 794, 1543, 1547, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = feb,\n volume = {135},\n number = {1044},\n eid = {028001},\n pages = {028001},\n doi = {10.1088/1538-3873/acac53},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2212.12069},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135b8001R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@INPROCEEDINGS{Rieke2005,\n author = {{Rieke}, Marcia J. and {Kelly}, Douglas and {Horner}, Scott},\n title = \"{Overview of James Webb Space Telescope and NIRCam's Role}\",\n booktitle = {Cryogenic Optical Systems and Instruments XI},\n year = 2005,\n editor = {{Heaney}, James B. and {Burriesci}, Lawrence G.},\n series = {Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series},\n volume = {5904},\n month = aug,\n pages = {1-8},\n doi = {10.1117/12.615554},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005SPIE.5904....1R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Rieke2015,\n author = {{Rieke}, G.~H. and {Wright}, G.~S. and {B{\\\"o}ker}, T. and {Bouwman}, J. and {Colina}, L. and {Glasse}, Alistair and {Gordon}, K.~D. and {Greene}, T.~P. and {G{\\\"u}del}, Manuel and {Henning}, Th. and {Justtanont}, K. and {Lagage}, P. -O. and {Meixner}, M.~E. and {N{\\o}rgaard-Nielsen}, H. -U. and {Ray}, T.~P. and {Ressler}, M.~E. and {van Dishoeck}, E.~F. and {Waelkens}, C.},\n title = \"{The Mid-Infrared Instrument for the James Webb Space Telescope, I: Introduction}\",\n journal = {\\pasp},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = jul,\n volume = {127},\n number = {953},\n pages = {584},\n doi = {10.1086/682252},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1508.02294},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASP..127..584R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wright2023,\n author = {{Wright}, Gillian S. and {Rieke}, George H. and {Glasse}, Alistair and {Ressler}, Michael and {Garc{\\'\\i}a Mar{\\'\\i}n}, Macarena and {Aguilar}, Jonathan and {Alberts}, Stacey and {{\\'A}lvarez-M{\\'a}rquez}, Javier and {Argyriou}, Ioannis and {Banks}, Kimberly and {Baudoz}, Pierre and {Boccaletti}, Anthony and {Bouchet}, Patrice and {Bouwman}, Jeroen and {Brandl}, Bernard R. and {Breda}, David and {Bright}, Stacey and {Cale}, Steven and {Colina}, Luis and {Cossou}, Christophe and {Coulais}, Alain and {Cracraft}, Misty and {De Meester}, Wim and {Dicken}, Daniel and {Engesser}, Michael and {Etxaluze}, Mireya and {Fox}, Ori D. and {Friedman}, Scott and {Fu}, Henry and {Gasman}, Danny and {G{\\'a}sp{\\'a}r}, Andr{\\'a}s and {Gastaud}, Ren{\\'e} and {Geers}, Vincent and {Glauser}, Adrian Michael and {Gordon}, Karl D. and {Greene}, Thomas and {Greve}, Thomas R. and {Grundy}, Timothy and {G{\\\"u}del}, Manuel and {Guillard}, Pierre and {Haderlein}, Peter and {Hashimoto}, Ryan and {Henning}, Thomas and {Hines}, Dean and {Holler}, Bryan and {Detre}, {\\\"O}rs Hunor and {Jahromi}, Amir and {James}, Bryan and {Jones}, Olivia C. and {Justtanont}, Kay and {Kavanagh}, Patrick and {Kendrew}, Sarah and {Klaassen}, Pamela and {Krause}, Oliver and {Labiano}, Alvaro and {Lagage}, Pierre-Olivier and {Lambros}, Scott and {Larson}, Kirsten and {Law}, David and {Lee}, David and {Libralato}, Mattia and {Lorenzo Alverez}, Jose and {Meixner}, Margaret and {Morrison}, Jane and {Mueller}, Migo and {Murray}, Katherine and {Mycroft}, Matthew and {Myers}, Richard and {Nayak}, Omnarayani and {Naylor}, Bret and {Nickson}, Bryony and {Noriega-Crespo}, Alberto and {{\\\"O}stlin}, G{\\\"o}ran and {O'Sullivan}, Brian and {Ottens}, Richard and {Patapis}, Polychronis and {Penanen}, Konstantin and {Pietraszkiewicz}, Martin and {Ray}, Tom and {Regan}, Michael and {Roteliuk}, Anthony and {Royer}, Pierre and {Samara-Ratna}, Piyal and {Samuelson}, Bridget and {Sargent}, Beth A. and {Scheithauer}, Silvia and {Schneider}, Analyn and {Schreiber}, J{\\\"u}rgen and {Shaughnessy}, Bryan and {Sheehan}, Evan and {Shivaei}, Irene and {Sloan}, G.~C. and {Tamas}, Laszlo and {Teague}, Kelly and {Temim}, Tea and {Tikkanen}, Tuomo and {Tustain}, Samuel and {van Dishoeck}, Ewine F. and {Vandenbussche}, Bart and {Weilert}, Mark and {Whitehouse}, Paul and {Wolff}, Schuyler},\n title = \"{The Mid-infrared Instrument for JWST and Its In-flight Performance}\",\n journal = {\\pasp},\n keywords = {Space vehicle instruments, Astronomical instrumentation, 1548, 799},\n year = 2023,\n month = apr,\n volume = {135},\n number = {1046},\n eid = {048003},\n pages = {048003},\n doi = {10.1088/1538-3873/acbe66},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135d8003W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Jakobsen2022,\n author = {{Jakobsen}, P. and {Ferruit}, P. and {Alves de Oliveira}, C. and {Arribas}, S. and {Bagnasco}, G. and {Barho}, R. and {Beck}, T.~L. and {Birkmann}, S. and {B{\\\"o}ker}, T. and {Bunker}, A.~J. and {Charlot}, S. and {de Jong}, P. and {de Marchi}, G. and {Ehrenwinkler}, R. and {Falcolini}, M. and {Fels}, R. and {Franx}, M. and {Franz}, D. and {Funke}, M. and {Giardino}, G. and {Gnata}, X. and {Holota}, W. and {Honnen}, K. and {Jensen}, P.~L. and {Jentsch}, M. and {Johnson}, T. and {Jollet}, D. and {Karl}, H. and {Kling}, G. and {K{\\\"o}hler}, J. and {Kolm}, M. -G. and {Kumari}, N. and {Lander}, M.~E. and {Lemke}, R. and {L{\\'o}pez-Caniego}, M. and {L{\\\"u}tzgendorf}, N. and {Maiolino}, R. and {Manjavacas}, E. and {Marston}, A. and {Maschmann}, M. and {Maurer}, R. and {Messerschmidt}, B. and {Moseley}, S.~H. and {Mosner}, P. and {Mott}, D.~B. and {Muzerolle}, J. and {Pirzkal}, N. and {Pittet}, J. -F. and {Plitzke}, A. and {Posselt}, W. and {Rapp}, B. and {Rauscher}, B.~J. and {Rawle}, T. and {Rix}, H. -W. and {R{\\\"o}del}, A. and {Rumler}, P. and {Sabbi}, E. and {Salvignol}, J. -C. and {Schmid}, T. and {Sirianni}, M. and {Smith}, C. and {Strada}, P. and {te Plate}, M. and {Valenti}, J. and {Wettemann}, T. and {Wiehe}, T. and {Wiesmayer}, M. and {Willott}, C.~J. and {Wright}, R. and {Zeidler}, P. and {Zincke}, C.},\n title = \"{The Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) on the James Webb Space Telescope. I. Overview of the instrument and its capabilities}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {instrumentation: spectrographs, space vehicles: instruments, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2022,\n month = may,\n volume = {661},\n eid = {A80},\n pages = {A80},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202142663},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2202.03305},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...661A..80J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Boker2023,\n author = {{B{\\\"o}ker}, T. and {Beck}, T.~L. and {Birkmann}, S.~M. and {Giardino}, G. and {Keyes}, C. and {Kumari}, N. and {Muzerolle}, J. and {Rawle}, T. and {Zeidler}, P. and {Abul-Huda}, Y. and {Alves de Oliveira}, C. and {Arribas}, S. and {Bechtold}, K. and {Bhatawdekar}, R. and {Bonaventura}, N. and {Bunker}, A.~J. and {Cameron}, A.~J. and {Carniani}, S. and {Charlot}, S. and {Curti}, M. and {Espinoza}, N. and {Ferruit}, P. and {Franx}, M. and {Jakobsen}, P. and {Karakla}, D. and {L{\\'o}pez-Caniego}, M. and {L{\\\"u}tzgendorf}, N. and {Maiolino}, R. and {Manjavacas}, E. and {Marston}, A.~P. and {Moseley}, S.~H. and {Ogle}, P. and {Perna}, M. and {Pe{\\~n}a-Guerrero}, M. and {Pirzkal}, N. and {Plesha}, R. and {Proffitt}, C.~R. and {Rauscher}, B.~J. and {Rix}, H. -W. and {Rodr{\\'\\i}guez del Pino}, B. and {Rustamkulov}, Z. and {Sabbi}, E. and {Sing}, D.~K. and {Sirianni}, M. and {te Plate}, M. and {{\\'U}beda}, L. and {Wahlgren}, G.~M. and {Wislowski}, E. and {Wu}, R. and {Willott}, Chris J.},\n title = \"{In-orbit Performance of the Near-infrared Spectrograph NIRSpec on the James Webb Space Telescope}\",\n journal = {\\pasp},\n keywords = {Space vehicle instruments, Spectrometers, Spectroscopy, Space telescopes, 1548, 1554, 1558, 1547, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = mar,\n volume = {135},\n number = {1045},\n eid = {038001},\n pages = {038001},\n doi = {10.1088/1538-3873/acb846},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2301.13766},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135c8001B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Doyon2023,\n author = {{Doyon}, Ren{\\'e} and {Willott}, Chris J. and {Hutchings}, John B. and {Sivaramakrishnan}, Anand and {Albert}, Lo{\\\"\\i}c and {Lafreni{\\`e}re}, David and {Rowlands}, Neil and {Bego{\\~n}a Vila}, M. and {Martel}, Andr{\\'e} R. and {LaMassa}, Stephanie and {Aldridge}, David and {Artigau}, {\\'E}tienne and {Cameron}, Peter and {Chayer}, Pierre and {Cook}, Neil J. and {Cooper}, Rachel A. and {Darveau-Bernier}, Antoine and {Dupuis}, Jean and {Earnshaw}, Colin and {Espinoza}, N{\\'e}stor and {Filippazzo}, Joseph C. and {Fullerton}, Alexander W. and {Gaudreau}, Daniel and {Gawlik}, Roman and {Goudfrooij}, Paul and {Haley}, Craig and {Kammerer}, Jens and {Kendall}, David and {Lambros}, Scott D. and {Ignat}, Luminita Ilinca and {Maszkiewicz}, Michael and {McColgan}, Ashley and {Morishita}, Takahiro and {Ouellette}, Nathalie N. -Q. and {Pacifici}, Camilla and {Philippi}, Natasha and {Radica}, Michael and {Ravindranath}, Swara and {Rowe}, Jason and {Roy}, Arpita and {Roy}, Niladri and {Saad}, Karl and {Sohn}, Sangmo Tony and {Talens}, Geert Jan and {Touahri}, Driss and {Thatte}, Deepashri and {Taylor}, Joanna M. and {Vandal}, Thomas and {Volk}, Kevin and {Wander}, Michel and {Warner}, Gerald and {Zheng}, Sheng-Hai and {Zhou}, Julia and {Abraham}, Roberto and {Beaulieu}, Mathilde and {Benneke}, Bj{\\\"o}rn and {Ferrarese}, Laura and {Jayawardhana}, Ray and {Johnstone}, Doug and {Kaltenegger}, Lisa and {Meyer}, Michael R. and {Pipher}, Judy L. and {Rameau}, Julien and {Rieke}, Marcia and {Salhi}, Salma and {Sawicki}, Marcin},\n title = \"{The Near Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph for the James Webb Space Telescope. I. Instrument Overview and In-flight Performance}\",\n journal = {\\pasp},\n keywords = {Space vehicle instruments, Astronomical instrumentation, 1548, 799, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = sep,\n volume = {135},\n number = {1051},\n eid = {098001},\n pages = {098001},\n doi = {10.1088/1538-3873/acd41b},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2306.03277},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135i8001D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Finkelstein2025,\n author = {{Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Arrabal Haro}, Pablo and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Lotz}, Jennifer M. and {Papovich}, Casey and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Pirzkal}, Nor and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {Yang}, Guang and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Grazian}, Andrea and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Kewley}, Lisa J. and {Kirkpatrick}, Allison and {Larson}, Rebecca L. and {Pentericci}, Laura and {Ravindranath}, Swara and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Almaini}, Omar and {Amor{\\'\\i}n}, Ricardo O. and {Barro}, Guillermo and {Bhatawdekar}, Rachana and {Bisigello}, Laura and {Brooks}, Madisyn and {Buat}, V{\\'e}ronique and {Buitrago}, Fernando and {Burgarella}, Denis and {Calabr{\\`o}}, Antonello and {Castellano}, Marco and {Cheng}, Yingjie and {Cleri}, Nikko J. and {Cole}, Justin W. and {Cooper}, M.~C. and {Cooper}, Olivia R. and {Costantin}, Luca and {Cox}, Isa G. and {Croton}, Darren and {Daddi}, Emanuele and {Davis}, Kelcey and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Elbaz}, David and {Fern{\\'a}ndez}, Vital and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Gandolfi}, Giovanni and {Gardner}, Jonathan P. and {Gawiser}, Eric and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {G{\\'o}mez-Guijarro}, Carlos and {Guo}, Yuchen and {Gupta}, Ansh R. and {Hathi}, Nimish P. and {Harish}, Santosh and {Henry}, Aur{\\'e}lien and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Hu}, Weida and {Hutchison}, Taylor A. and {Iyer}, Kartheik G. and {Jaskot}, Anne E. and {Jha}, Saurabh W. and {Jung}, Intae and {Kassin}, Susan A. and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Kurczynski}, Peter and {Leung}, Gene C.~K. and {Llerena}, Mario and {Long}, Arianna S. and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {Lu}, Shiying and {McGrath}, Elizabeth J. and {McIntosh}, Daniel H. and {Merlin}, Emiliano and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Morales}, Alexa M. and {Napolitano}, Lorenzo and {Pacucci}, Fabio and {Pandya}, Viraj and {Rafelski}, Marc and {Rodighiero}, Giulia and {Rose}, Caitlin and {Santini}, Paola and {Seill{\\'e}}, Lise-Marie and {Simons}, Raymond C. and {Shen}, Lu and {Straughn}, Amber N. and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Taylor}, Anthony J. and {Vanderhoof}, Brittany N. and {Vega-Ferrero}, Jes{\\'u}s and {Weiner}, Benjamin J. and {Willmer}, Christopher N.~A. and {Zhu}, Peixin and {Bell}, Eric F. and {Wuyts}, Stijn and {Holwerda}, Benne W. and {Wang}, Xin and {Wang}, Weichen and {Zavala}, Jorge A. and {CEERS Collaboration}},\n title = \"{The Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey (CEERS)}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Surveys, Galaxy formation, Supermassive black holes, 594, 1671, 595, 1663, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = apr,\n volume = {983},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L4},\n pages = {L4},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/adbbd3},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2501.04085},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...983L...4F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bezanson2024,\n author = {{Bezanson}, Rachel and {Labbe}, Ivo and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Leja}, Joel and {Price}, Sedona H. and {Franx}, Marijn and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Zitrin}, Adi and {Wang}, Bingjie and {Weaver}, John R. and {Furtak}, Lukas J. and {Atek}, Hakim and {Coe}, Dan and {Cutler}, Sam E. and {Dayal}, Pratika and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Feldmann}, Robert and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, Natascha M. and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Geha}, Marla and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {de Graaff}, Anna and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Juneau}, St{\\'e}phanie and {Kassin}, Susan and {Kriek}, Mariska and {Khullar}, Gourav and {Maseda}, Michael and {Mowla}, Lamiya A. and {Muzzin}, Adam and {Nanayakkara}, Themiya and {Nelson}, Erica J. and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Pacifici}, Camilla and {Pan}, Richard and {Papovich}, Casey and {Setton}, David J. and {Shapley}, Alice E. and {Smit}, Renske and {Stefanon}, Mauro and {Taylor}, Edward N. and {Williams}, Christina C.},\n title = \"{The JWST UNCOVER Treasury Survey: Ultradeep NIRSpec and NIRCam Observations before the Epoch of Reionization}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {James Webb Space Telescope, Redshift surveys, Galaxy evolution, Galaxy formation, Observational astronomy, Abell clusters, High-redshift galaxies, Galaxies, 2291, 1378, 594, 595, 1145, 9, 734, 573, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = oct,\n volume = {974},\n number = {1},\n eid = {92},\n pages = {92},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2212.04026},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...974...92B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Oesch2023,\n author = {{Oesch}, P.~A. and {Brammer}, G. and {Naidu}, R.~P. and {Bouwens}, R.~J. and {Chisholm}, J. and {Illingworth}, G.~D. and {Matthee}, J. and {Nelson}, E. and {Qin}, Y. and {Reddy}, N. and {Shapley}, A. and {Shivaei}, I. and {van Dokkum}, P. and {Weibel}, A. and {Whitaker}, K. and {Wuyts}, S. and {Covelo-Paz}, A. and {Endsley}, R. and {Fudamoto}, Y. and {Giovinazzo}, E. and {Herard-Demanche}, T. and {Kerutt}, J. and {Kramarenko}, I. and {Labbe}, I. and {Leonova}, E. and {Lin}, J. and {Magee}, D. and {Marchesini}, D. and {Maseda}, M. and {Mason}, C. and {Matharu}, J. and {Meyer}, R.~A. and {Neufeld}, C. and {Prieto Lyon}, G. and {Schaerer}, D. and {Sharma}, R. and {Shuntov}, M. and {Smit}, R. and {Stefanon}, M. and {Wyithe}, J.~S.~B. and {Xiao}, M.},\n title = \"{The JWST FRESCO survey: legacy NIRCam/grism spectroscopy and imaging in the two GOODS fields}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {surveys, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, dark ages, reionization, first stars, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = oct,\n volume = {525},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2864-2874},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad2411},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2304.02026},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.2864O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@MISC{Dunlop2021,\n author = {{Dunlop}, James S. and {Abraham}, Roberto G. and {Ashby}, Matthew L.~N. and {Bagley}, Micaela and {Best}, Philip N. and {Bongiorno}, Angela and {Bouwens}, Rychard and {Bowler}, Rebecca A.~A. and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Bremer}, Malcolm and {Calabro'}, Antonello and {Carnall}, Adam and {Castellano}, Marco and {Cirasuolo}, Michele and {Conselice}, Christopher and {Cullen}, Fergus and {Dave}, Romeel and {Dayal}, Pratika and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Duncan}, Kenneth James and {Elbaz}, David and {Ellis}, Richard S. and {Ferguson}, Harry C. and {Ferrara}, Andrea and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Furlanetto}, Steven and {Fynbo}, Johan P.~U. and {Gallerani}, Simona and {Gardner}, Jonathan P. and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Grazian}, Andrea and {Grogin}, Norman and {Harikane}, Yuichi and {Hopkins}, Philip F. and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Illingworth}, Garth D. and {Juneau}, Stephanie and {Jung}, Intae and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan and {Kassin}, Susan and {Kauffmann}, Olivier Benjamin and {Khochfar}, Sadegh and {Kirkpatrick}, Allison and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Labbe}, Ivo and {Laporte}, Nicolas and {Larson}, Rebecca L. and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {Magee}, Daniel K. and {Mason}, Charlotte and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {McLeod}, Derek and {McLure}, Ross and {Merlin}, Emiliano and {Mesinger}, Andrei and {Milvang-Jensen}, Bo and {Newman}, Jeffrey Allen and {Oesch}, Pascal and {Ouchi}, Masami and {Pacifici}, Camilla and {Papovich}, Casey and {Peacock}, John and {Peeples}, Molly and {Pentericci}, Laura and {Perez-Gonzalez}, Pablo G. and {Pirzkal}, Norbert and {Pope}, Alexandra and {Pye}, John P. and {Reddy}, Naveen A. and {Robertson}, Brant and {Salvato}, Mara and {Santini}, Paola and {Schaerer}, Daniel and {Shapley}, Alice E. and {Simons}, Raymond and {Smit}, Renske and {Smith}, Britton D. and {Snyder}, Greg and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Stanway}, Elizabeth R. and {Stefanon}, Mauro and {Tasca}, Lidia and {Tikkanen}, Tuomo and {Tresse}, Laurence and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Wilkins}, Stephen Matthew and {Wright}, Gillian and {Wyithe}, J. Stuart B. and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {van der Werf}, Paul},\n title = \"{PRIMER: Public Release IMaging for Extragalactic Research}\",\n howpublished = {JWST Proposal. Cycle 1, ID. \\#1837},\n year = 2021,\n month = mar,\n pages = {1837},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021jwst.prop.1837D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bagley2024,\n author = {{Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Pirzkal}, Nor and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Papovich}, Casey and {Berg}, Danielle A. and {Lotz}, Jennifer M. and {Leung}, Gene C.~K. and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron and {Backhaus}, Bren E. and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Castellano}, Marco and {Ch{\\'a}vez Ortiz}, {\\'O}scar A. and {Chworowsky}, Katherine and {Cox}, Isabella G. and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel and {Davis}, Kelcey and {Estrada-Carpenter}, Vicente and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Gardner}, Jonathan P. and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Grazian}, Andrea and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Hathi}, Nimish P. and {Hutchison}, Taylor A. and {Jaskot}, Anne E. and {Jung}, Intae and {Kewley}, Lisa J. and {Kirkpatrick}, Allison and {Larson}, Rebecca L. and {Matharu}, Jasleen and {Natarajan}, Priyamvada and {Pentericci}, Laura and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Ravindranath}, Swara and {Rothberg}, Barry and {Ryan}, Russell and {Shen}, Lu and {Simons}, Raymond C. and {Snyder}, Gregory F. and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {Wilkins}, Stephen M.},\n title = \"{The Next Generation Deep Extragalactic Exploratory Public (NGDEEP) Survey}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Early universe, Galaxy formation, Galaxy evolution, Galaxy chemical evolution, 435, 595, 594, 580, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = apr,\n volume = {965},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L6},\n pages = {L6},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ad2f31},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2302.05466},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...965L...6B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Eisenstein2023,\n author = {{Eisenstein}, Daniel J. and {Willott}, Chris and {Alberts}, Stacey and {Arribas}, Santiago and {Bonaventura}, Nina and {Bunker}, Andrew J. and {Cameron}, Alex J. and {Carniani}, Stefano and {Charlot}, Stephane and {Curtis-Lake}, Emma and {D'Eugenio}, Francesco and {Ferruit}, Pierre and {Giardino}, Giovanna and {Hainline}, Kevin and {Hausen}, Ryan and {Jakobsen}, Peter and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Maiolino}, Roberto and {Rauscher}, Bernard J. and {Rieke}, Marcia and {Rieke}, George and {Rix}, Hans-Walter and {Robertson}, Brant and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Willmer}, Christopher N.~A. and {Baker}, William M. and {Baum}, Stefi and {Bhatawdekar}, Rachana and {Boyett}, Kristan and {Chen}, Zuyi and {Chevallard}, Jacopo and {Circosta}, Chiara and {Curti}, Mirko and {Danhaive}, A. Lola and {DeCoursey}, Christa and {Endsley}, Ryan and {de Graaff}, Anna and {Dressler}, Alan and {Egami}, Eiichi and {Helton}, Jakob M. and {Hviding}, Raphael E. and {Ji}, Zhiyuan and {Jones}, Gareth C. and {Kumari}, Nimisha and {L{\\\"u}tzgendorf}, Nora and {Laseter}, Isaac and {Looser}, Tobias J. and {Lyu}, Jianwei and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {Nelson}, Erica and {Parlanti}, Eleonora and {Perna}, Michele and {Pusk{\\'a}s}, D{\\'a}vid and {Rawle}, Tim and {Rodr{\\'\\i}guez Del Pino}, Bruno and {Rujopakarn}, Wiphu and {Sandles}, Lester and {Saxena}, Aayush and {Scholtz}, Jan and {Sharpe}, Katherine and {Shivaei}, Irene and {Silcock}, Maddie S. and {Simmonds}, Charlotte and {Skarbinski}, Maya and {Smit}, Renske and {Stone}, Meredith and {Suess}, Katherine A. and {Sun}, Fengwu and {Tang}, Mengtao and {Topping}, Michael W. and {{\\\"U}bler}, Hannah and {Villanueva}, Natalia C. and {Wallace}, Imaan E.~B. and {Whitler}, Lily and {Witstok}, Joris and {Woodrum}, Charity},\n title = \"{Overview of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES)}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Sky surveys, Galaxy evolution, Lyman-break galaxies, 1464, 594, 979, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2026,\n month = mar,\n volume = {283},\n number = {1},\n eid = {6},\n pages = {6},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4365/ae3163},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2306.02465},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJS..283....6E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Rigby2023,\n author = {{Rigby}, Jane and {Perrin}, Marshall and {McElwain}, Michael and {Kimble}, Randy and {Friedman}, Scott and {Lallo}, Matt and {Doyon}, Ren{\\'e} and {Feinberg}, Lee and {Ferruit}, Pierre and {Glasse}, Alistair and {Rieke}, Marcia and {Rieke}, George and {Wright}, Gillian and {Willott}, Chris and {Colon}, Knicole and {Milam}, Stefanie and {Neff}, Susan and {Stark}, Christopher and {Valenti}, Jeff and {Abell}, Jim and {Abney}, Faith and {Abul-Huda}, Yasin and {Acton}, D. Scott and {Adams}, Evan and {Adler}, David and {Aguilar}, Jonathan and {Ahmed}, Nasif and {Albert}, Lo{\\\"\\i}c and {Alberts}, Stacey and {Aldridge}, David and {Allen}, Marsha and {Altenburg}, Martin and {{\\'A}lvarez-M{\\'a}rquez}, Javier and {Alves de Oliveira}, Catarina and {Andersen}, Greg and {Anderson}, Harry and {Anderson}, Sara and {Argyriou}, Ioannis and {Armstrong}, Amber and {Arribas}, Santiago and {Artigau}, Etienne and {Arvai}, Amanda and {Atkinson}, Charles and {Bacon}, Gregory and {Bair}, Thomas and {Banks}, Kimberly and {Barrientes}, Jaclyn and {Barringer}, Bruce and {Bartosik}, Peter and {Bast}, William and {Baudoz}, Pierre and {Beatty}, Thomas and {Bechtold}, Katie and {Beck}, Tracy and {Bergeron}, Eddie and {Bergkoetter}, Matthew and {Bhatawdekar}, Rachana and {Birkmann}, Stephan and {Blazek}, Ronald and {Blome}, Claire and {Boccaletti}, Anthony and {B{\\\"o}ker}, Torsten and {Boia}, John and {Bonaventura}, Nina and {Bond}, Nicholas and {Bosley}, Kari and {Boucarut}, Ray and {Bourque}, Matthew and {Bouwman}, Jeroen and {Bower}, Gary and {Bowers}, Charles and {Boyer}, Martha and {Bradley}, Larry and {Brady}, Greg and {Braun}, Hannah and {Breda}, David and {Bresnahan}, Pamela and {Bright}, Stacey and {Britt}, Christopher and {Bromenschenkel}, Asa and {Brooks}, Brian and {Brooks}, Keira and {Brown}, Bob and {Brown}, Matthew and {Brown}, Patricia and {Bunker}, Andy and {Burger}, Matthew and {Bushouse}, Howard and {Cale}, Steven and {Cameron}, Alex and {Cameron}, Peter and {Canipe}, Alicia and {Caplinger}, James and {Caputo}, Francis and {Cara}, Mihai and {Carey}, Larkin and {Carniani}, Stefano and {Carrasquilla}, Maria and {Carruthers}, Margaret and {Case}, Michael and {Catherine}, Riggs and {Chance}, Don and {Chapman}, George and {Charlot}, St{\\'e}phane and {Charlow}, Brian and {Chayer}, Pierre and {Chen}, Bin and {Cherinka}, Brian and {Chichester}, Sarah and {Chilton}, Zack and {Chonis}, Taylor and {Clampin}, Mark and {Clark}, Charles and {Clark}, Kerry and {Coe}, Dan and {Coleman}, Benee and {Comber}, Brian and {Comeau}, Tom and {Connolly}, Dennis and {Cooper}, James and {Cooper}, Rachel and {Coppock}, Eric and {Correnti}, Matteo and {Cossou}, Christophe and {Coulais}, Alain and {Coyle}, Laura and {Cracraft}, Misty and {Curti}, Mirko and {Cuturic}, Steven and {Davis}, Katherine and {Davis}, Michael and {Dean}, Bruce and {DeLisa}, Amy and {deMeester}, Wim and {Dencheva}, Nadia and {Dencheva}, Nadezhda and {DePasquale}, Joseph and {Deschenes}, Jeremy and {Hunor Detre}, {\\\"O}rs and {Diaz}, Rosa and {Dicken}, Dan and {DiFelice}, Audrey and {Dillman}, Matthew and {Dixon}, William and {Doggett}, Jesse and {Donaldson}, Tom and {Douglas}, Rob and {DuPrie}, Kimberly and {Dupuis}, Jean and {Durning}, John and {Easmin}, Nilufar and {Eck}, Weston and {Edeani}, Chinwe and {Egami}, Eiichi and {Ehrenwinkler}, Ralf and {Eisenhamer}, Jonathan and {Eisenhower}, Michael and {Elie}, Michelle and {Elliott}, James and {Elliott}, Kyle and {Ellis}, Tracy and {Engesser}, Michael and {Espinoza}, Nestor and {Etienne}, Odessa and {Etxaluze}, Mireya and {Falini}, Patrick and {Feeney}, Matthew and {Ferry}, Malcolm and {Filippazzo}, Joseph and {Fincham}, Brian and {Fix}, Mees and {Flagey}, Nicolas and {Florian}, Michael and {Flynn}, Jim and {Fontanella}, Erin and {Ford}, Terrance and {Forshay}, Peter and {Fox}, Ori and {Franz}, David and {Fu}, Henry and {Fullerton}, Alexander and {Galkin}, Sergey and {Galyer}, Anthony and {Garc{\\'\\i}a Mar{\\'\\i}n}, Macarena and {Gardner}, Jonathan P. and {Gardner}, Lisa and {Garland}, Dennis and {Garrett}, Bruce and {Gasman}, Danny and {Gaspar}, Andras and {Gaudreau}, Daniel and {Gauthier}, Peter and {Geers}, Vincent and {Geithner}, Paul and {Gennaro}, Mario and {Giardino}, Giovanna and {Girard}, Julien and {Giuliano}, Mark and {Glassmire}, Kirk and {Glauser}, Adrian},\n title = \"{The Science Performance of JWST as Characterized in Commissioning}\",\n journal = {\\pasp},\n keywords = {Observatories, Infrared astronomy, Astronomical instrumentation, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = apr,\n volume = {135},\n number = {1046},\n eid = {048001},\n pages = {048001},\n doi = {10.1088/1538-3873/acb293},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2207.05632},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PASP..135d8001R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Papovich2023,\n author = {{Papovich}, Casey and {Cole}, Justin W. and {Yang}, Guang and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Barro}, Guillermo and {Buat}, V{\\'e}ronique and {Burgarella}, Denis and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Santini}, Paola and {Seill{\\'e}}, Lise-Marie and {Shen}, Lu and {Arrabal Haro}, Pablo and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Bell}, Eric F. and {Bisigello}, Laura and {Calabr{\\`o}}, Antonello and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Castellano}, Marco and {Chworowsky}, Katherine and {Cleri}, Nikko J. and {Costantin}, Luca and {Cooper}, M.~C. and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Grazian}, Andrea and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Hathi}, Nimish P. and {Holwerda}, Benne W. and {Hutchison}, Taylor A. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Kewley}, Lisa J. and {Kirkpatrick}, Allison and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Larson}, Rebecca L. and {Long}, Arianna S. and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {Pentericci}, Laura and {Pirzkal}, Nor and {Ravindranath}, Swara and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {Urbano Stawinski}, Stephanie M. and {Weiner}, Benjamin J. and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron and {Zavala}, Jorge A.},\n title = \"{CEERS Key Paper. V. Galaxies at 4 < z < 9 Are Bluer than They Appear{\\textendash}Characterizing Galaxy Stellar Populations from Rest-frame {\\ensuremath{\\sim}}1 {\\ensuremath{\\mu}}m Imaging}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy formation, Cosmology, Galaxy colors, Galaxy properties, Galaxy masses, Spectral energy distribution, 594, 595, 343, 586, 615, 607, 2129, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = jun,\n volume = {949},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L18},\n pages = {L18},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/acc948},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2301.00027},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...949L..18P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Song2023,\n author = {{Song}, Jie and {Fang}, GuanWen and {Lin}, Zesen and {Gu}, Yizhou and {Kong}, Xu},\n title = \"{Solution to the Conflict between the Estimations of Resolved and Unresolved Galaxy Stellar Mass from the Perspective of JWST}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy properties, High-redshift galaxies, Astronomy data analysis, 615, 734, 1858, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = nov,\n volume = {958},\n number = {1},\n eid = {82},\n pages = {82},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad0365},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2310.12228},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...958...82S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Markov2023,\n author = {{Markov}, V. and {Gallerani}, S. and {Pallottini}, A. and {Sommovigo}, L. and {Carniani}, S. and {Ferrara}, A. and {Parlanti}, E. and {Di Mascia}, F.},\n title = \"{Dust attenuation law in JWST galaxies at z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 7-8}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {dust, extinction, Galaxy: evolution, Galaxy: fundamental parameters, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: ISM, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = nov,\n volume = {679},\n eid = {A12},\n pages = {A12},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202346723},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2304.11178},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...679A..12M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{CurtisLake2023,\n author = {{Curtis-Lake}, Emma and {Carniani}, Stefano and {Cameron}, Alex and {Charlot}, Stephane and {Jakobsen}, Peter and {Maiolino}, Roberto and {Bunker}, Andrew and {Witstok}, Joris and {Smit}, Renske and {Chevallard}, Jacopo and {Willott}, Chris and {Ferruit}, Pierre and {Arribas}, Santiago and {Bonaventura}, Nina and {Curti}, Mirko and {D'Eugenio}, Francesco and {Franx}, Marijn and {Giardino}, Giovanna and {Looser}, Tobias J. and {L{\\\"u}tzgendorf}, Nora and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {Rawle}, Tim and {Rix}, Hans-Walter and {Rodr{\\'\\i}guez del Pino}, Bruno and {{\\\"U}bler}, Hannah and {Sirianni}, Marco and {Dressler}, Alan and {Egami}, Eiichi and {Eisenstein}, Daniel J. and {Endsley}, Ryan and {Hainline}, Kevin and {Hausen}, Ryan and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Rieke}, Marcia and {Robertson}, Brant and {Shivaei}, Irene and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Willmer}, Christopher N.~A. and {Bhatawdekar}, Rachana and {Bowler}, Rebecca and {Boyett}, Kristan and {Chen}, Zuyi and {de Graaff}, Anna and {Helton}, Jakob M. and {Hviding}, Raphael E. and {Jones}, Gareth C. and {Kumari}, Nimisha and {Lyu}, Jianwei and {Nelson}, Erica and {Perna}, Michele and {Sandles}, Lester and {Saxena}, Aayush and {Suess}, Katherine A. and {Sun}, Fengwu and {Topping}, Michael W. and {Wallace}, Imaan E.~B. and {Whitler}, Lily},\n title = \"{Spectroscopic confirmation of four metal-poor galaxies at z = 10.3-13.2}\",\n journal = {Nature Astronomy},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = may,\n volume = {7},\n pages = {622-632},\n doi = {10.1038/s41550-023-01918-w},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2212.04568},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs...7..622C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{NavarroCarrera2024,\n author = {{Navarro-Carrera}, Rafael and {Rinaldi}, Pierluigi and {Caputi}, Karina I. and {Iani}, Edoardo and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {van Mierlo}, Sophie E.},\n title = \"{Constraints on the Faint End of the Galaxy Stellar Mass Function at z ≃ 4{\\textendash}8 from Deep JWST Data}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {High-redshift galaxies, Galaxy evolution, Stellar mass functions, James Webb Space Telescope, 734, 594, 1612, 2291, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = feb,\n volume = {961},\n number = {2},\n eid = {207},\n pages = {207},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad0df6},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2305.16141},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961..207N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Faisst2024,\n author = {{Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Yang}, Lilan and {Brinch}, M. and {Casey}, C.~M. and {Chartab}, N. and {Dessauges-Zavadsky}, M. and {Drakos}, N.~E. and {Gillman}, S. and {Gozaliasl}, G. and {Hayward}, C.~C. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Jablonka}, P. and {Kaminsky}, A. and {Kartaltepe}, J.~S. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Kokorev}, V. and {Lambrides}, E. and {Liu}, D. and {Maraston}, C. and {Martin}, C.~L. and {Renzini}, A. and {Robertson}, B.~E. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Sattari}, Z. and {Scoville}, N. and {Urry}, C.~M. and {Vijayan}, A.~P. and {Weaver}, J.~R. and {Akins}, H.~B. and {Allen}, N. and {Arango-Toro}, R.~C. and {Cooper}, O.~R. and {Franco}, M. and {Gentile}, F. and {Harish}, S. and {Hirschmann}, M. and {Khostovan}, A.~A. and {Laigle}, C. and {Larson}, R.~L. and {Lee}, M. and {Liu}, Z. and {Long}, A.~S. and {Magdis}, G. and {Massey}, R. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {McKinney}, J. and {Paquereau}, L. and {Rhodes}, J. and {Rich}, R.~M. and {Shuntov}, M. and {Silverman}, J.~D. and {Talia}, M. and {Toft}, S. and {Zavala}, J.~A.},\n title = \"{COSMOS-Web: The Role of Galaxy Interactions and Disk Instabilities in Producing Starbursts at z < 4}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Starburst galaxies, Galaxy interactions, Galaxy disks, 1570, 600, 589, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = feb,\n volume = {980},\n number = {2},\n eid = {204},\n pages = {204},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ada566},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2405.09619},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...980..204F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Fujimoto2024,\n author = {{Fujimoto}, S. and {Ouchi}, M. and {Kohno}, K. and {Valentino}, F. and {Gim{\\'e}nez-Arteaga}, C. and {Brammer}, G.~B. and {Furtak}, L.~J. and {Kohandel}, M. and {Oguri}, M. and {Pallottini}, A. and {Richard}, J. and {Zitrin}, A. and {Bauer}, F.~E. and {Boylan-Kolchin}, M. and {Dessauges-Zavadsky}, M. and {Egami}, E. and {Finkelstein}, S.~L. and {Ma}, Z. and {Smail}, I. and {Watson}, D. and {Hutchison}, T.~A. and {Rigby}, J.~R. and {Welch}, B.~D. and {Ao}, Y. and {Bradley}, L.~D. and {Caminha}, G.~B. and {Caputi}, K.~I. and {Espada}, D. and {Endsley}, R. and {Fudamoto}, Y. and {Gonz{\\'a}lez-L{\\'o}pez}, J. and {Hatsukade}, B. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Kokorev}, V. and {Laporte}, N. and {Lee}, M. and {Magdis}, G.~E. and {Ono}, Y. and {Rizzo}, F. and {Shibuya}, T. and {Shimasaku}, K. and {Sun}, F. and {Toft}, S. and {Umehata}, H. and {Wang}, T. and {Yajima}, H.},\n title = \"{Primordial rotating disk composed of at least 15 dense star-forming clumps at cosmic dawn}\",\n journal = {Nature Astronomy},\n keywords = {Astrophysics of Galaxies, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = aug,\n volume = {9},\n pages = {1553-1567},\n doi = {10.1038/s41550-025-02592-w},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2402.18543},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025NatAs...9.1553F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Fujimoto2023,\n author = {{Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Burgarella}, Denis and {Carilli}, Chris L. and {Buat}, V{\\'e}ronique and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Ciesla}, Laure and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Zavala}, Jorge A. and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Fudamoto}, Yoshinobu and {Ouchi}, Masami and {Valentino}, Francesco and {Cooper}, M.~C. and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Hutchison}, Taylor A. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Kojima}, Takashi and {Larson}, Rebecca L. and {Murphy}, E.~J. and {Papovich}, Casey and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Yoon}, Ilsang and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Akins}, Hollis and {Amor{\\'\\i}n}, Ricardo O. and {Arrabal Haro}, Pablo and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Chworowsky}, Katherine and {Cleri}, Nikko J. and {Cooper}, Olivia R. and {Costantin}, Luca and {Daddi}, Emanuele and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Jim{\\'e}nez-Andrade}, E.~F. and {Juneau}, St{\\'e}phanie and {Kirkpatrick}, Allison and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Le Bail}, Aur{\\'e}lien and {Long}, Arianna and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {Magnelli}, Benjamin and {McKinney}, Jed and {Rose}, Caitlin and {Seill{\\'e}}, Lise-Marie and {Simons}, Raymond C. and {Weiner}, Benjamin J. and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron},\n title = \"{ALMA FIR View of Ultra-high-redshift Galaxy Candidates at z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 11-17: Blue Monsters or Low-z Red Interlopers?}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {High-redshift galaxies, Galaxy formation, Galaxy evolution, 734, 595, 594, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = oct,\n volume = {955},\n number = {2},\n eid = {130},\n pages = {130},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aceb67},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2211.03896},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...955..130F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mason2023,\n author = {{Mason}, Charlotte A. and {Trenti}, Michele and {Treu}, Tommaso},\n title = \"{The brightest galaxies at cosmic dawn}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, cosmology: theory, galaxies: high-redshift, dark ages, reionization, first stars, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = may,\n volume = {521},\n number = {1},\n pages = {497-503},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad035},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2207.14808},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521..497M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Narayanan2024,\n author = {{Narayanan}, Desika and {Lower}, Sidney and {Torrey}, Paul and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Cui}, Weiguang and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel and {Iyer}, Kartheik G. and {Li}, Qi and {Lovell}, Christopher C. and {Sales}, Laura V. and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {Marinacci}, Federico and {Vogelsberger}, Mark},\n title = \"{Outshining by Recent Star Formation Prevents the Accurate Measurement of High-z Galaxy Stellar Masses}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies, Galaxy ages, High-redshift galaxies, Starburst galaxies, 573, 576, 734, 1570, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jan,\n volume = {961},\n number = {1},\n eid = {73},\n pages = {73},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad0966},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2306.10118},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961...73N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Schaerer&deBarros2009,\n author = {{Schaerer}, D. and {de Barros}, S.},\n title = \"{The impact of nebular emission on the ages of z{\\ensuremath{\\approx}} 6 galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: starburst, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = aug,\n volume = {502},\n number = {2},\n pages = {423-426},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/200911781},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0905.0866},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...502..423S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Barro2024,\n author = {{Barro}, Guillermo and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {McGrath}, Elizabeth J. and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {Simons}, Raymond C. and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron and {Arrabal Haro}, Pablo and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Bagley}, Michaela B. and {Cleri}, Nikko J. and {Costantin}, Luca and {Davis}, Kelcey and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Finkelstein}, Steve L. and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {G{\\'o}mez-Guijarro}, Carlos and {Hathi}, Nimish P. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Holwerda}, Benne W. and {Huertas-Company}, Marc and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {Papovich}, Casey and {Pirzkal}, Nor and {Seill{\\'e}}, Lise-Marie and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Wuyts}, Stijn and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {de la Vega}, Alexander and {Yang}, Guang and {Zavala}, Jorge A.},\n title = \"{Extremely Red Galaxies at z = 5{\\textendash}9 with MIRI and NIRSpec: Dusty Galaxies or Obscured Active Galactic Nuclei?}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy formation, Galaxy evolution, High-redshift galaxies, Stellar populations, James Webb Space Telescope, Galaxy photometry, 595, 594, 734, 1622, 2291, 611, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = mar,\n volume = {963},\n number = {2},\n eid = {128},\n pages = {128},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad167e},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2305.14418},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...963..128B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Shengdong2025,\n author = {{Lu}, Shengdong and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {Bose}, Sownak and {Lacey}, Cedric G. and {Cole}, Shaun and {Baugh}, Carlton M. and {Helly}, John C.},\n title = \"{A comparison of pre-existing {\\ensuremath{\\Lambda}}CDM predictions with the abundance of JWST galaxies at high redshift}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = jan,\n volume = {536},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1018-1034},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae2646},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2406.02672},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536.1018L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Trinca2024,\n author = {{Trinca}, Alessandro and {Schneider}, Raffaella and {Valiante}, Rosa and {Graziani}, Luca and {Ferrotti}, Arianna and {Omukai}, Kazuyuki and {Chon}, Sunmyon},\n title = \"{Exploring the nature of UV-bright z {\\ensuremath{\\gtrsim}} 10 galaxies detected by JWST: star formation, black hole accretion, or a non-universal IMF?}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, quasars: supermassive black holes, dark ages, reionization, first stars, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = apr,\n volume = {529},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3563-3581},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae651},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2305.04944},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.3563T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Cameron2024,\n author = {{Cameron}, Alex J. and {Katz}, Harley and {Witten}, Callum and {Saxena}, Aayush and {Laporte}, Nicolas and {Bunker}, Andrew J.},\n title = \"{Nebular dominated galaxies: insights into the stellar initial mass function at high redshift}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = oct,\n volume = {534},\n number = {1},\n pages = {523-543},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae1547},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2311.02051},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534..523C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Weibel2024b,\n author = {{Weibel}, Andrea and {de Graaff}, Anna and {Setton}, David J. and {Miller}, Tim B. and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Lagos}, Claudia D.~P. and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Baggen}, Josephine F.~W. and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Boogaard}, Leindert A. and {Cleri}, Nikko J. and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Hviding}, Raphael E. and {Kuruvanthodi}, Adarsh and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Leja}, Joel and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {Matthee}, Jorryt and {McConachie}, Ian and {Naidu}, Rohan P. and {Roberts-Borsani}, Guido and {Schaerer}, Daniel and {Suess}, Katherine A. and {Valentino}, Francesco and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Wang}, Bingjie},\n title = \"{RUBIES Reveals a Massive Quiescent Galaxy at z = 7.3}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy spectroscopy, Galaxy properties, Post-starburst galaxies, Quenched galaxies, Galaxy quenching, James Webb Space Telescope, Galaxy photometry, Spectral energy distribution, 594, 2171, 615, 2176, 2016, 2040, 2291, 611, 2129, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = apr,\n volume = {983},\n number = {1},\n eid = {11},\n pages = {11},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/adab7a},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2409.03829},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...983...11W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Greene2024,\n author = {{Greene}, Jenny E. and {Labbe}, Ivo and {Goulding}, Andy D. and {Furtak}, Lukas J. and {Chemerynska}, Iryna and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Dayal}, Pratika and {Volonteri}, Marta and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Wang}, Bingjie and {Setton}, David J. and {Burgasser}, Adam J. and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Atek}, Hakim and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Cutler}, Sam E. and {Feldmann}, Robert and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {de Graaff}, Anna and {Khullar}, Gourav and {Leja}, Joel and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {Matthee}, Jorryt and {Miller}, Tim B. and {Naidu}, Rohan P. and {Nanayakkara}, Themiya and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Pan}, Richard and {Papovich}, Casey and {Price}, Sedona H. and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Weaver}, John R. and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Zitrin}, Adi},\n title = \"{UNCOVER Spectroscopy Confirms the Surprising Ubiquity of Active Galactic Nuclei in Red Sources at z > 5}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active galactic nuclei, High-redshift galaxies, 16, 734, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = mar,\n volume = {964},\n number = {1},\n eid = {39},\n pages = {39},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2309.05714},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...964...39G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Labbe2023,\n author = {{Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Nelson}, Erica and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Suess}, Katherine A. and {Leja}, Joel and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Whitaker}, Katherine and {Mathews}, Elijah and {Stefanon}, Mauro and {Wang}, Bingjie},\n title = \"{A population of red candidate massive galaxies 600 Myr after the Big Bang}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = apr,\n volume = {616},\n number = {7956},\n pages = {266-269},\n doi = {10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2207.12446},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.616..266L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Carniani2024,\n author = {{Carniani}, Stefano and {Hainline}, Kevin and {D'Eugenio}, Francesco and {Eisenstein}, Daniel J. and {Jakobsen}, Peter and {Witstok}, Joris and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Chevallard}, Jacopo and {Maiolino}, Roberto and {Helton}, Jakob M. and {Willott}, Chris and {Robertson}, Brant and {Alberts}, Stacey and {Arribas}, Santiago and {Baker}, William M. and {Bhatawdekar}, Rachana and {Boyett}, Kristan and {Bunker}, Andrew J. and {Cameron}, Alex J. and {Cargile}, Phillip A. and {Charlot}, St{\\'e}phane and {Curti}, Mirko and {Curtis-Lake}, Emma and {Egami}, Eiichi and {Giardino}, Giovanna and {Isaak}, Kate and {Ji}, Zhiyuan and {Jones}, Gareth C. and {Kumari}, Nimisha and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {Parlanti}, Eleonora and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Rawle}, Tim and {Rieke}, George and {Rieke}, Marcia and {Del Pino}, Bruno Rodr{\\'\\i}guez and {Saxena}, Aayush and {Scholtz}, Jan and {Smit}, Renske and {Sun}, Fengwu and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {{\\\"U}bler}, Hannah and {Venturi}, Giacomo and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Willmer}, Christopher N.~A.},\n title = \"{Spectroscopic confirmation of two luminous galaxies at a redshift of 14}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = sep,\n volume = {633},\n number = {8029},\n pages = {318-322},\n doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2405.18485},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Natur.633..318C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Carnall2024,\n author = {{Carnall}, A.~C. and {Cullen}, F. and {McLure}, R.~J. and {McLeod}, D.~J. and {Begley}, R. and {Donnan}, C.~T. and {Dunlop}, J.~S. and {Shapley}, A.~E. and {Rowlands}, K. and {Almaini}, O. and {Arellano-C{\\'o}rdova}, K.~Z. and {Barrufet}, L. and {Cimatti}, A. and {Ellis}, R.~S. and {Grogin}, N.~A. and {Hamadouche}, M.~L. and {Illingworth}, G.~D. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Leung}, H. -H. and {Lovell}, C.~C. and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, P.~G. and {Santini}, P. and {Stanton}, T.~M. and {Wild}, V.},\n title = \"{The JWST EXCELS survey: too much, too young, too fast? Ultra-massive quiescent galaxies at 3 < z < 5}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = oct,\n volume = {534},\n number = {1},\n pages = {325-348},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae2092},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2405.02242},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534..325C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Chemerynska2024,\n author = {{Chemerynska}, Iryna and {Atek}, Hakim and {Furtak}, Lukas J. and {Zitrin}, Adi and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Dayal}, Pratika and {Weibel}, Andrea and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Goulding}, Andy D. and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Nanayakkara}, Themiya and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Cutler}, Sam E. and {Labbe}, Ivo and {Leja}, Joel and {Pan}, Richard and {Price}, Sedona H. and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Wang}, Bingjie and {Weaver}, John R. and {Whitaker}, Katherine E.},\n title = \"{JWST UNCOVER: the overabundance of ultraviolet-luminous galaxies at z > 9}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jun,\n volume = {531},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2615-2625},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae1260},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2312.05030},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531.2615C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Finkelstein2022,\n author = {{Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Arrabal Haro}, Pablo and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Papovich}, Casey and {Burgarella}, Denis and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Huertas-Company}, Marc and {Iyer}, Kartheik G. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Larson}, Rebecca L. and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Rose}, Caitlin and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Chworowsky}, Katherine and {Medrano}, Aubrey and {Morales}, Alexa M. and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Grazian}, Andrea and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Kewley}, Lisa J. and {Kirkpatrick}, Allison and {Kurczynski}, Peter and {Lotz}, Jennifer M. and {Pentericci}, Laura and {Pirzkal}, Nor and {Ravindranath}, Swara and {Ryan}, Russell E. and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {Yang}, Guang and {Almaini}, Omar and {Amor{\\'\\i}n}, Ricardo O. and {Annunziatella}, Marianna and {Backhaus}, Bren E. and {Barro}, Guillermo and {Behroozi}, Peter and {Bell}, Eric F. and {Bhatawdekar}, Rachana and {Bisigello}, Laura and {Bromm}, Volker and {Buat}, V{\\'e}ronique and {Buitrago}, Fernando and {Calabr{\\`o}}, Antonello and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Castellano}, Marco and {Ch{\\'a}vez Ortiz}, {\\'O}scar A. and {Ciesla}, Laure and {Cleri}, Nikko J. and {Cohen}, Seth H. and {Cole}, Justin W. and {Cooke}, Kevin C. and {Cooper}, M.~C. and {Cooray}, Asantha R. and {Costantin}, Luca and {Cox}, Isabella G. and {Croton}, Darren and {Daddi}, Emanuele and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel and {de La Vega}, Alexander and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Elbaz}, David and {Estrada-Carpenter}, Vicente and {Faber}, Sandra M. and {Fern{\\'a}ndez}, Vital and {Finkelstein}, Keely D. and {Freundlich}, Jonathan and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Garc{\\'\\i}a-Argum{\\'a}nez}, {\\'A}ngela and {Gardner}, Jonathan P. and {Gawiser}, Eric and {G{\\'o}mez-Guijarro}, Carlos and {Guo}, Yuchen and {Hamblin}, Kurt and {Hamilton}, Timothy S. and {Hathi}, Nimish P. and {Holwerda}, Benne W. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Hutchison}, Taylor A. and {Jaskot}, Anne E. and {Jha}, Saurabh W. and {Jogee}, Shardha and {Juneau}, St{\\'e}phanie and {Jung}, Intae and {Kassin}, Susan A. and {Le Bail}, Aur{\\'e}lien and {Leung}, Gene C.~K. and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {Magnelli}, Benjamin and {Mantha}, Kameswara Bharadwaj and {Matharu}, Jasleen and {McGrath}, Elizabeth J. and {McIntosh}, Daniel H. and {Merlin}, Emiliano and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Newman}, Jeffrey A. and {Nicholls}, David C. and {Pandya}, Viraj and {Rafelski}, Marc and {Ronayne}, Kaila and {Santini}, Paola and {Seill{\\'e}}, Lise-Marie and {Shah}, Ekta A. and {Shen}, Lu and {Simons}, Raymond C. and {Snyder}, Gregory F. and {Stanway}, Elizabeth R. and {Straughn}, Amber N. and {Teplitz}, Harry I. and {Vanderhoof}, Brittany N. and {Vega-Ferrero}, Jes{\\'u}s and {Wang}, Weichen and {Weiner}, Benjamin J. and {Willmer}, Christopher N.~A. and {Wuyts}, Stijn and {Zavala}, Jorge A. and {Ceers Team}},\n title = \"{A Long Time Ago in a Galaxy Far, Far Away: A Candidate z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 12 Galaxy in Early JWST CEERS Imaging}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Early universe, Galaxy formation, Galaxy evolution, 435, 595, 594, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = dec,\n volume = {940},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L55},\n pages = {L55},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ac966e},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2207.12474},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940L..55F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Harikane2023,\n author = {{Harikane}, Yuichi and {Ouchi}, Masami and {Oguri}, Masamune and {Ono}, Yoshiaki and {Nakajima}, Kimihiko and {Isobe}, Yuki and {Umeda}, Hiroya and {Mawatari}, Ken and {Zhang}, Yechi},\n title = \"{A Comprehensive Study of Galaxies at z 9-16 Found in the Early JWST Data: Ultraviolet Luminosity Functions and Cosmic Star Formation History at the Pre-reionization Epoch}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy formation, High-redshift galaxies, 594, 595, 734, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = mar,\n volume = {265},\n number = {1},\n eid = {5},\n pages = {5},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4365/acaaa9},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2208.01612},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJS..265....5H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Weibel2024,\n author = {{Weibel}, Andrea and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Barrufet}, Laia and {Gottumukkala}, Rashmi and {Ellis}, Richard S. and {Santini}, Paola and {Weaver}, John R. and {Allen}, Natalie and {Bouwens}, Rychard and {Bowler}, Rebecca A.~A. and {Brammer}, Gabe and {Carnall}, Adam C. and {Cullen}, Fergus and {Dayal}, Pratika and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Donnan}, Callum T. and {Dunlop}, James S. and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Illingworth}, Garth D. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Labbe}, Ivo and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {McLeod}, Derek J. and {McLure}, Ross J. and {Naidu}, Rohan P. and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Stefanon}, Mauro and {Toft}, Sune and {Xiao}, Mengyuan},\n title = \"{Galaxy build-up in the first 1.5 Gyr of cosmic history: insights from the stellar mass function at z 4-9 from JWST NIRCam observations}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = sep,\n volume = {533},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1808-1838},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae1891},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2403.08872},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533.1808W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Finkelstein2024,\n author = {{Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Leung}, Gene C.~K. and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Papovich}, Casey and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Arrabal Haro}, Pablo and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Pirzkal}, Nor and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron and {Amor{\\'\\i}n}, Ricardo O. and {Backhaus}, Bren E. and {Behroozi}, Peter and {Bisigello}, Laura and {Bromm}, Volker and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Ch{\\'a}vez Ortiz}, {\\'O}scar A. and {Cheng}, Yingjie and {Chworowsky}, Katherine and {Cleri}, Nikko J. and {Cooper}, M.~C. and {Davis}, Kelcey and {de la Vega}, Alexander and {Elbaz}, David and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Holwerda}, Benne W. and {Huertas-Company}, Marc and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Iyer}, Kartheik G. and {Jogee}, Shardha and {Jung}, Intae and {Larson}, Rebecca L. and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Morales}, Alexa M. and {Morley}, Caroline V. and {Mukherjee}, Sagnick and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Ravindranath}, Swara and {Rodighiero}, Giulia and {Rowland}, Melanie J. and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Taylor}, Anthony J. and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {Wilkins}, Stephen M.},\n title = \"{The Complete CEERS Early Universe Galaxy Sample: A Surprisingly Slow Evolution of the Space Density of Bright Galaxies at z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 8.5{\\textendash}14.5}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Early universe, Galaxy formation, Galaxy evolution, Luminosity function, 435, 595, 594, 942, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jul,\n volume = {969},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L2},\n pages = {L2},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ad4495},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2311.04279},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...969L...2F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Jespersen2024,\n author = {{Jespersen}, Christian Kragh and {Steinhardt}, Charles L. and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Lovell}, Christopher C.},\n title = \"{On the Significance of Rare Objects at High Redshift: The Impact of Cosmic Variance}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies, High-redshift galaxies, Galaxy formation, Astrostatistics, 573, 734, 595, 1882, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = mar,\n volume = {982},\n number = {1},\n eid = {23},\n pages = {23},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/adb422},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2403.00050},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...982...23J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Boylan-Kolchin2023,\n author = {{Boylan-Kolchin}, Michael},\n title = \"{Stress testing {\\ensuremath{\\Lambda}}CDM with high-redshift galaxy candidates}\",\n journal = {Nature Astronomy},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = jun,\n volume = {7},\n pages = {731-735},\n doi = {10.1038/s41550-023-01937-7},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2208.01611},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs...7..731B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ferrara2023,\n author = {{Ferrara}, Andrea and {Pallottini}, Andrea and {Dayal}, Pratika},\n title = \"{On the stunning abundance of super-early, luminous galaxies revealed by JWST}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = jul,\n volume = {522},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3986-3991},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad1095},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2208.00720},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.522.3986F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dalmasso2024c,\n author = {{Dalmasso}, Nicol{\\`o} and {Calabr{\\`o}}, Antonello and {Leethochawalit}, Nicha and {Vulcani}, Benedetta and {Boyett}, Kristan and {Trenti}, Michele and {Treu}, Tommaso and {Castellano}, Marco and {Brada{\\v{c}}}, Maru{\\v{s}}a and {Metha}, Benjamin and {Santini}, Paola},\n title = \"{The rate and contribution of mergers to mass assembly from NIRCam observations of galaxy candidates up to 13.3 billion years ago}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = oct,\n volume = {533},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4472-4484},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae2064},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2403.11428},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533.4472D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{PerezGonzales23,\n author = {{P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Costantin}, Luca and {Langeroodi}, Danial and {Rinaldi}, Pierluigi and {Annunziatella}, Marianna and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Colina}, Luis and {N{\\o}rgaard-Nielsen}, Hans Ulrik and {Greve}, Thomas R. and {{\\\"O}stlin}, G{\\\"o}ran and {Wright}, Gillian and {Alonso-Herrero}, Almudena and {{\\'A}lvarez-M{\\'a}rquez}, Javier and {Caputi}, Karina I. and {Eckart}, Andreas and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, Olivier and {Labiano}, {\\'A}lvaro and {Garc{\\'\\i}a-Mar{\\'\\i}n}, Macarena and {Hjorth}, Jens and {Kendrew}, Sarah and {Pye}, John P. and {Tikkanen}, Tuomo and {van der Werf}, Paul and {Walter}, Fabian and {Ward}, Martin and {Bik}, Arjan and {Boogaard}, Leindert and {Bosman}, Sarah E.~I. and {G{\\'o}mez}, Alejandro Crespo and {Gillman}, Steven and {Iani}, Edoardo and {Jermann}, Iris and {Melinder}, Jens and {Meyer}, Romain A. and {Moutard}, Thibaud and {van Dishoek}, Ewine and {Henning}, Thomas and {Lagage}, Pierre-Olivier and {Guedel}, Manuel and {Peissker}, Florian and {Ray}, Tom and {Vandenbussche}, Bart and {Garc{\\'\\i}a-Argum{\\'a}nez}, {\\'A}ngela and {Mar{\\'\\i}a M{\\'e}rida}, Rosa},\n title = \"{Life beyond 30: Probing the -20 < M $_{UV}$ < -17 Luminosity Function at 8 < z < 13 with the NIRCam Parallel Field of the MIRI Deep Survey}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Galaxy formation, Galaxy evolution, Early universe, High-redshift galaxies, Broad band photometry, James Webb Space Telescope, 595, 594, 435, 734, 184, 2291, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = jul,\n volume = {951},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L1},\n pages = {L1},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/acd9d0},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2302.02429},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...951L...1P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Silk24,\n author = {{Silk}, Joseph and {Begelman}, Mitchell C. and {Norman}, Colin and {Nusser}, Adi and {Wyse}, Rosemary F.~G.},\n title = \"{Which Came First: Supermassive Black Holes or Galaxies? Insights from JWST}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Active galactic nuclei, Quasars, Black holes, 16, 1319, 162, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, High Energy Physics - Theory},\n year = 2024,\n month = feb,\n volume = {961},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L39},\n pages = {L39},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ad1bf0},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2401.02482},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961L..39S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Klypin21,\n author = {{Klypin}, Anatoly and {Poulin}, Vivian and {Prada}, Francisco and {Primack}, Joel and {Kamionkowski}, Marc and {Avila-Reese}, Vladimir and {Rodriguez-Puebla}, Aldo and {Behroozi}, Peter and {Hellinger}, Doug and {Smith}, Tristan L.},\n title = \"{Clustering and halo abundances in early dark energy cosmological models}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {large-scale structure of Universe, dark matter, galaxies: haloes, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology},\n year = 2021,\n month = jun,\n volume = {504},\n number = {1},\n pages = {769-781},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stab769},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2006.14910},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504..769K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Liu24,\n author = {{Liu}, Weiyang and {Zhan}, Hu and {Gong}, Yan and {Wang}, Xin},\n title = \"{Can early dark energy be probed by the high-redshift galaxy abundance?}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = sep,\n volume = {533},\n number = {1},\n pages = {860-871},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae1871},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2402.14339},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533..860L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Alam19,\n author = {{Alam}, Shadab and {Zu}, Ying and {Peacock}, John A. and {Mandelbaum}, Rachel},\n title = \"{Cosmic web dependence of galaxy clustering and quenching in SDSS}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {gravitation, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = mar,\n volume = {483},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4501-4517},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty3477},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1801.04878},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.4501A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{Paranjape18,\n author = {{Paranjape}, Aseem and {Hahn}, Oliver and {Sheth}, Ravi K.},\n title = \"{The dependence of galaxy clustering on tidal environment in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = jun,\n volume = {476},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5442-5452},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty633},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1801.04568},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.5442P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{Croton07,\n author = {{Croton}, Darren J. and {Gao}, Liang and {White}, Simon D.~M.},\n title = \"{Halo assembly bias and its effects on galaxy clustering}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: statistics, cosmology: theory., large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = feb,\n volume = {374},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1303-1309},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11230.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0605636},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.374.1303C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{PallottiniFerrara23,\n author = {{Pallottini}, A. and {Ferrara}, A.},\n title = \"{Stochastic star formation in early galaxies: Implications for the James Webb Space Telescope}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: star formation, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = sep,\n volume = {677},\n eid = {L4},\n pages = {L4},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202347384},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2307.03219},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677L...4P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{DeLucia06,\n author = {{De Lucia}, Gabriella and {Springel}, Volker and {White}, Simon D.~M. and {Croton}, Darren and {Kauffmann}, Guinevere},\n title = \"{The formation history of elliptical galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: bulges, galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = feb,\n volume = {366},\n number = {2},\n pages = {499-509},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09879.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0509725},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.366..499D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Matthee24_LRD,\n author = {{Matthee}, Jorryt and {Naidu}, Rohan P. and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Chisholm}, John and {Eilers}, Anna-Christina and {Goulding}, Andy and {Greene}, Jenny and {Kashino}, Daichi and {Labbe}, Ivo and {Lilly}, Simon J. and {Mackenzie}, Ruari and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Weibel}, Andrea and {Wuyts}, Stijn and {Xiao}, Mengyuan and {Bordoloi}, Rongmon and {Bouwens}, Rychard and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Illingworth}, Garth and {Kramarenko}, Ivan and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {Mason}, Charlotte and {Meyer}, Romain A. and {Nelson}, Erica J. and {Reddy}, Naveen A. and {Shivaei}, Irene and {Simcoe}, Robert A. and {Yue}, Minghao},\n title = \"{Little Red Dots: An Abundant Population of Faint Active Galactic Nuclei at z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 5 Revealed by the EIGER and FRESCO JWST Surveys}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {High-redshift galaxies, Quasars, Active galactic nuclei, Reionization, 734, 1319, 16, 1383, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = mar,\n volume = {963},\n number = {2},\n eid = {129},\n pages = {129},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2306.05448},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...963..129M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Zavala23,\n author = {{Zavala}, Jorge A. and {Buat}, V{\\'e}ronique and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Burgarella}, Denis and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Ciesla}, Laure and {Daddi}, Emanuele and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Jim{\\'e}nez-Andrade}, E.~F. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Le Bail}, Aur{\\'e}lien and {Murphy}, E.~J. and {Papovich}, Casey and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Aretxaga}, Itziar and {Behroozi}, Peter and {Champagne}, Jaclyn B. and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Grazian}, Andrea and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Kewley}, Lisa J. and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Kirkpatrick}, Allison and {Lotz}, Jennifer M. and {Pentericci}, Laura and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Pirzkal}, Nor and {Ravindranath}, Swara and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {Yang}, Guang and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron and {Almaini}, Omar and {Amor{\\'\\i}n}, Ricardo O. and {Annunziatella}, Marianna and {Arrabal Haro}, Pablo and {Backhaus}, Bren E. and {Barro}, Guillermo and {Bell}, Eric F. and {Bhatawdekar}, Rachana and {Bisigello}, Laura and {Buitrago}, Fernando and {Calabr{\\`o}}, Antonello and {Castellano}, Marco and {Ch{\\'a}vez Ortiz}, {\\'O}scar A. and {Chworowsky}, Katherine and {Cleri}, Nikko J. and {Cohen}, Seth H. and {Cole}, Justin W. and {Cooke}, Kevin C. and {Cooper}, M.~C. and {Cooray}, Asantha R. and {Costantin}, Luca and {Cox}, Isabella G. and {Croton}, Darren and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel and {de La Vega}, Alexander and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Elbaz}, David and {Estrada-Carpenter}, Vicente and {Fern{\\'a}ndez}, Vital and {Finkelstein}, Keely D. and {Freundlich}, Jonathan and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Garc{\\'\\i}a-Argum{\\'a}nez}, {\\'A}ngela and {Gardner}, Jonathan P. and {Gawiser}, Eric and {G{\\'o}mez-Guijarro}, Carlos and {Guo}, Yuchen and {Hamilton}, Timothy S. and {Hathi}, Nimish P. and {Holwerda}, Benne W. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Huertas-Company}, Marc and {Hutchison}, Taylor A. and {Iyer}, Kartheik G. and {Jaskot}, Anne E. and {Jha}, Saurabh W. and {Jogee}, Shardha and {Juneau}, St{\\'e}phanie and {Jung}, Intae and {Kassin}, Susan A. and {Kurczynski}, Peter and {Larson}, Rebecca L. and {Leung}, Gene C.~K. and {Long}, Arianna S. and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {Magnelli}, Benjamin and {Mantha}, Kameswara Bharadwaj and {Matharu}, Jasleen and {McGrath}, Elizabeth J. and {McIntosh}, Daniel H. and {Medrano}, Aubrey and {Merlin}, Emiliano and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Morales}, Alexa M. and {Newman}, Jeffrey A. and {Nicholls}, David C. and {Pandya}, Viraj and {Rafelski}, Marc and {Ronayne}, Kaila and {Rose}, Caitlin and {Ryan}, Russell E. and {Santini}, Paola and {Seill{\\'e}}, Lise-Marie and {Shah}, Ekta A. and {Shen}, Lu and {Simons}, Raymond C. and {Snyder}, Gregory F. and {Stanway}, Elizabeth R. and {Straughn}, Amber N. and {Teplitz}, Harry I. and {Vanderhoof}, Brittany N. and {Vega-Ferrero}, Jes{\\'u}s and {Wang}, Weichen and {Weiner}, Benjamin J. and {Willmer}, Christopher N.~A. and {Wuyts}, Stijn and {Ceers Team}},\n title = \"{Dusty Starbursts Masquerading as Ultra-high Redshift Galaxies in JWST CEERS Observations}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {High-redshift galaxies, Galaxies, Lyman-break galaxies, Galaxy photometry, Submillimeter astronomy, Millimeter astronomy, Luminous infrared galaxies, Starburst galaxies, James Webb Space Telescope, Near infrared astronomy, Dust continuum emission, Emission line galaxies, 734, 573, 979, 611, 1647, 1061, 946, 1570, 2291, 1093, 412, 459, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = feb,\n volume = {943},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L9},\n pages = {L9},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/acacfe},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2208.01816},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...943L...9Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Naidu22a,\n author = {{Naidu}, Rohan P. and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Setton}, David J. and {Matthee}, Jorryt and {Conroy}, Charlie and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Weaver}, John R. and {Bouwens}, Rychard J. and {Brammer}, Gabriel B. and {Dayal}, Pratika and {Illingworth}, Garth D. and {Barrufet}, Laia and {Belli}, Sirio and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Bose}, Sownak and {Heintz}, Kasper E. and {Leja}, Joel and {Leonova}, Ecaterina and {Marques-Chaves}, Rui and {Stefanon}, Mauro and {Toft}, Sune and {van der Wel}, Arjen and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Weibel}, Andrea and {Whitaker}, Katherine E.},\n title = \"{Schrodinger's Galaxy Candidate: Puzzlingly Luminous at $z\\approx17$, or Dusty/Quenched at $z\\approx5$?}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = aug,\n eid = {arXiv:2208.02794},\n pages = {arXiv:2208.02794},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2208.02794},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2208.02794},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220802794N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Naidu2022b,\n author = {{Naidu}, Rohan P. and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Nelson}, Erica J. and {Suess}, Katherine A. and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Illingworth}, Garth and {Bouwens}, Rychard and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Matthee}, Jorryt and {Allen}, Natalie and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Conroy}, Charlie and {Labbe}, Ivo and {Leja}, Joel and {Leonova}, Ecaterina and {Magee}, Dan and {Price}, Sedona H. and {Setton}, David J. and {Strait}, Victoria and {Stefanon}, Mauro and {Toft}, Sune and {Weaver}, John R. and {Weibel}, Andrea},\n title = \"{Two Remarkably Luminous Galaxy Candidates at z {\\ensuremath{\\approx}} 10-12 Revealed by JWST}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {James Webb Space Telescope, Galaxy evolution, Early universe, High-redshift galaxies, Galaxy formation, 2291, 594, 435, 734, 595, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = nov,\n volume = {940},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L14},\n pages = {L14},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b22},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2207.09434},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940L..14N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n%---------------------------------- SHMR ----------------------------------\n\n@ARTICLE{Leauthaud12,\n author = {{Leauthaud}, Alexie and {Tinker}, Jeremy and {Bundy}, Kevin and {Behroozi}, Peter S. and {Massey}, Richard and {Rhodes}, Jason and {George}, Matthew R. and {Kneib}, Jean-Paul and {Benson}, Andrew and {Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Busha}, Michael T. and {Capak}, Peter and {Cort{\\^e}s}, Marina and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, Oliver and {Lilly}, Simon and {McCracken}, Henry J. and {Salvato}, Mara and {Schrabback}, Tim and {Scoville}, Nick and {Smith}, Tristan and {Taylor}, James E.},\n title = \"{New Constraints on the Evolution of the Stellar-to-dark Matter Connection: A Combined Analysis of Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing, Clustering, and Stellar Mass Functions from z = 0.2 to z =1}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark matter, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies: stellar content, gravitational lensing: weak, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2012,\n month = jan,\n volume = {744},\n number = {2},\n eid = {159},\n pages = {159},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/159},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1104.0928},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...744..159L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Harikane16,\n author = {{Harikane}, Yuichi and {Ouchi}, Masami and {Ono}, Yoshiaki and {More}, Surhud and {Saito}, Shun and {Lin}, Yen-Ting and {Coupon}, Jean and {Shimasaku}, Kazuhiro and {Shibuya}, Takatoshi and {Price}, Paul A. and {Lin}, Lihwai and {Hsieh}, Bau-Ching and {Ishigaki}, Masafumi and {Komiyama}, Yutaka and {Silverman}, John and {Takata}, Tadafumi and {Tamazawa}, Hiroko and {Toshikawa}, Jun},\n title = \"{Evolution of Stellar-to-Halo Mass Ratio at z = 0 - 7 Identified by Clustering Analysis with the Hubble Legacy Imaging and Early Subaru/Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey Data}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = apr,\n volume = {821},\n number = {2},\n eid = {123},\n pages = {123},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/123},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1511.07873},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821..123H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Pallottini24,\n author = {{Pallottini}, A. and {Ferrara}, A. and {Gallerani}, S. and {Sommovigo}, L. and {Carniani}, S. and {Vallini}, L. and {Kohandel}, M. and {Venturi}, G.},\n title = \"{The mass-metallicity relation as a ruler for galaxy evolution: Insights from the James Webb Space Telescope}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics of Galaxies, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = jul,\n volume = {699},\n eid = {A6},\n pages = {A6},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202451742},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2408.00061},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...699A...6P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tacchella2018,\n author = {{Tacchella}, Sandro and {Bose}, Sownak and {Conroy}, Charlie and {Eisenstein}, Daniel J. and {Johnson}, Benjamin D.},\n title = \"{A Redshift-independent Efficiency Model: Star Formation and Stellar Masses in Dark Matter Halos at z {\\ensuremath{\\gtrsim}} 4}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: theory, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, stars: formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = dec,\n volume = {868},\n number = {2},\n eid = {92},\n pages = {92},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e0},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1806.03299},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...868...92T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Moster2018,\n author = {{Moster}, Benjamin P. and {Naab}, Thorsten and {White}, Simon D.~M.},\n title = \"{EMERGE - an empirical model for the formation of galaxies since z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 10}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: statistics, galaxies: stellar content, dark matter, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = jun,\n volume = {477},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1822-1852},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty655},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1705.05373},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.1822M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Stefanon2021,\n author = {{Stefanon}, Mauro and {Bouwens}, Rychard J. and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Illingworth}, Garth D. and {Gonzalez}, Valentino and {Oesch}, Pascal A.},\n title = \"{Galaxy Stellar Mass Functions from z 10 to z 6 using the Deepest Spitzer/Infrared Array Camera Data: No Significant Evolution in the Stellar-to-halo Mass Ratio of Galaxies in the First Gigayear of Cosmic Time}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {High-redshift galaxies, Lyman-break galaxies, Stellar mass functions, 4, 979, 1612, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = nov,\n volume = {922},\n number = {1},\n eid = {29},\n pages = {29},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac1bb6},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2103.16571},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...922...29S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{SunFurlanetto2016,\n author = {{Sun}, G. and {Furlanetto}, S.~R.},\n title = \"{Constraints on the star formation efficiency of galaxies during the epoch of reionization}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, early Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = jul,\n volume = {460},\n number = {1},\n pages = {417-433},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw980},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1512.06219},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460..417S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Finkelstein2015,\n author = {{Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Song}, Mimi and {Behroozi}, Peter and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Papovich}, Casey and {Milosavljevi{\\'c}}, Milo{\\v{s}} and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Narayanan}, Desika and {Ashby}, Matthew L.~N. and {Cooray}, Asantha and {Fazio}, Giovanni G. and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Salmon}, Brett and {Willner}, S.~P.},\n title = \"{An Increasing Stellar Baryon Fraction in Bright Galaxies at High Redshift}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {early universe, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, ultraviolet: galaxies, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = dec,\n volume = {814},\n number = {2},\n eid = {95},\n pages = {95},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/95},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1504.00005},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...814...95F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Zhu2020,\n author = {{Zhu}, Hanjue and {Avestruz}, Camille and {Gnedin}, Nickolay Y.},\n title = \"{Cosmic Reionization On Computers: The Galaxy-Halo Connection between 5 {\\ensuremath{\\leq}} z {\\ensuremath{\\leq}} 10}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies, Reionization, Hydrodynamical simulations, 573, 1383, 767, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2020,\n month = aug,\n volume = {899},\n number = {2},\n eid = {137},\n pages = {137},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aba26d},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2001.02233},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...899..137Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Stefanon2017,\n author = {{Stefanon}, Mauro and {Bouwens}, Rychard J. and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Muzzin}, Adam and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Oesch}, Pascal and {Gonzalez}, Valentino},\n title = \"{The Rest-frame Optical (900 nm) Galaxy Luminosity Function at z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 4-7: Abundance Matching Points to Limited Evolution in the M $_{STAR}$/M $_{HALO}$ Ratio at z {\\ensuremath{\\geq}} 4}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = jul,\n volume = {843},\n number = {1},\n eid = {36},\n pages = {36},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aa72d8},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1611.09354},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843...36S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Behroozi2015,\n author = {{Behroozi}, Peter S. and {Silk}, Joseph},\n title = \"{A Simple Technique for Predicting High-redshift Galaxy Evolution}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark matter, galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = jan,\n volume = {799},\n number = {1},\n eid = {32},\n pages = {32},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/32},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1404.5299},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...799...32B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n%---------------------------------- Simulations ----------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{Angulo2012,\n author = {{Angulo}, R.~E. and {Springel}, V. and {White}, S.~D.~M. and {Jenkins}, A. and {Baugh}, C.~M. and {Frenk}, C.~S.},\n title = \"{Scaling relations for galaxy clusters in the Millennium-XXL simulation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2012,\n month = nov,\n volume = {426},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2046-2062},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21830.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1203.3216},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.426.2046A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dave2019,\n author = {{Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel and {Angl{\\'e}s-Alc{\\'a}zar}, Daniel and {Narayanan}, Desika and {Li}, Qi and {Rafieferantsoa}, Mika H. and {Appleby}, Sarah},\n title = \"{SIMBA: Cosmological simulations with black hole growth and feedback}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2019,\n month = jun,\n volume = {486},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2827-2849},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz937},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1901.10203},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486.2827D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Pillepich2018b,\n author = {{Pillepich}, Annalisa and {Nelson}, Dylan and {Hernquist}, Lars and {Springel}, Volker and {Pakmor}, R{\\\"u}diger and {Torrey}, Paul and {Weinberger}, Rainer and {Genel}, Shy and {Naiman}, Jill P. and {Marinacci}, Federico and {Vogelsberger}, Mark},\n title = \"{First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the stellar mass content of groups and clusters of galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: general, galaxies: groups: general, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = mar,\n volume = {475},\n number = {1},\n pages = {648-675},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx3112},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1707.03406},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475..648P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{LiSS2024,\n author = {{Li}, Shun-Sheng and {Hoekstra}, Henk and {Kuijken}, Konrad and {Schaller}, Matthieu and {Schaye}, Joop},\n title = \"{Weak lensing constraints on the stellar-to-halo mass relation of galaxy groups with simulation-informed scatter}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: weak, methods: statistical, surveys, galaxies: groups: general, cosmology: observations, dark matter, Astrophysics of Galaxies, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = aug,\n volume = {700},\n eid = {A202},\n pages = {A202},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202452892},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2411.03152},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...700A.202L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mitchell2018,\n author = {{Mitchell}, Peter D. and {Lacey}, Cedric G. and {Lagos}, Claudia D.~P. and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {Bower}, Richard G. and {Cole}, Shaun and {Helly}, John C. and {Schaller}, Matthieu and {Gonzalez-Perez}, Violeta and {Theuns}, Tom},\n title = \"{Comparing galaxy formation in semi-analytic models and hydrodynamical simulations}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = feb,\n volume = {474},\n number = {1},\n pages = {492-521},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx2770},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1709.08647},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474..492M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Springel&Hernquist2003,\n author = {{Springel}, Volker and {Hernquist}, Lars},\n title = \"{Cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations: a hybrid multiphase model for star formation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = feb,\n volume = {339},\n number = {2},\n pages = {289-311},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06206.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0206393},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.339..289S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Schaye2015,\n author = {{Schaye}, Joop and {Crain}, Robert A. and {Bower}, Richard G. and {Furlong}, Michelle and {Schaller}, Matthieu and {Theuns}, Tom and {Dalla Vecchia}, Claudio and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {McCarthy}, I.~G. and {Helly}, John C. and {Jenkins}, Adrian and {Rosas-Guevara}, Y.~M. and {White}, Simon D.~M. and {Baes}, Maarten and {Booth}, C.~M. and {Camps}, Peter and {Navarro}, Julio F. and {Qu}, Yan and {Rahmati}, Alireza and {Sawala}, Till and {Thomas}, Peter A. and {Trayford}, James},\n title = \"{The EAGLE project: simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = jan,\n volume = {446},\n number = {1},\n pages = {521-554},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu2058},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1407.7040},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.446..521S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Vogelsberger2014,\n author = {{Vogelsberger}, Mark and {Genel}, Shy and {Springel}, Volker and {Torrey}, Paul and {Sijacki}, Debora and {Xu}, Dandan and {Snyder}, Greg and {Nelson}, Dylan and {Hernquist}, Lars},\n title = \"{Introducing the Illustris Project: simulating the coevolution of dark and visible matter in the Universe}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = oct,\n volume = {444},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1518-1547},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu1536},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1405.2921},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.444.1518V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hopkins2018,\n author = {{Hopkins}, Philip F. and {Wetzel}, Andrew and {Kere{\\v{s}}}, Du{\\v{s}}an and {Faucher-Gigu{\\`e}re}, Claude-Andr{\\'e} and {Quataert}, Eliot and {Boylan-Kolchin}, Michael and {Murray}, Norman and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {Garrison-Kimmel}, Shea and {Hummels}, Cameron and {Feldmann}, Robert and {Torrey}, Paul and {Ma}, Xiangcheng and {Angl{\\'e}s-Alc{\\'a}zar}, Daniel and {Su}, Kung-Yi and {Orr}, Matthew and {Schmitz}, Denise and {Escala}, Ivanna and {Sanderson}, Robyn and {Grudi{\\'c}}, Michael Y. and {Hafen}, Zachary and {Kim}, Ji-Hoon and {Fitts}, Alex and {Bullock}, James S. and {Wheeler}, Coral and {Chan}, T.~K. and {Elbert}, Oliver D. and {Narayanan}, Desika},\n title = \"{FIRE-2 simulations: physics versus numerics in galaxy formation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, stars: formation, galaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = oct,\n volume = {480},\n number = {1},\n pages = {800-863},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty1690},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1702.06148},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480..800H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dubois2021,\n author = {{Dubois}, Yohan and {Beckmann}, Ricarda and {Bournaud}, Fr{\\'e}d{\\'e}ric and {Choi}, Hoseung and {Devriendt}, Julien and {Jackson}, Ryan and {Kaviraj}, Sugata and {Kimm}, Taysun and {Kraljic}, Katarina and {Laigle}, Clotilde and {Martin}, Garreth and {Park}, Min-Jung and {Peirani}, S{\\'e}bastien and {Pichon}, Christophe and {Volonteri}, Marta and {Yi}, Sukyoung K.},\n title = \"{Introducing the NEWHORIZON simulation: Galaxy properties with resolved internal dynamics across cosmic time}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: stellar content, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = jul,\n volume = {651},\n eid = {A109},\n pages = {A109},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202039429},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2009.10578},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...651A.109D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Somerville2008,\n author = {{Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Hopkins}, Philip F. and {Cox}, Thomas J. and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Hernquist}, Lars},\n title = \"{A semi-analytic model for the co-evolution of galaxies, black holes and active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = dec,\n volume = {391},\n number = {2},\n pages = {481-506},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13805.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0808.1227},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.391..481S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Somerville2015,\n author = {{Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Popping}, Gerg{\\\"o} and {Trager}, Scott C.},\n title = \"{Star formation in semi-analytic galaxy formation models with multiphase gas}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = nov,\n volume = {453},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4337-4367},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv1877},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1503.00755},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453.4337S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lacey2016,\n author = {{Lacey}, Cedric G. and {Baugh}, Carlton M. and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {Benson}, Andrew J. and {Bower}, Richard G. and {Cole}, Shaun and {Gonzalez-Perez}, Violeta and {Helly}, John C. and {Lagos}, Claudia D.~P. and {Mitchell}, Peter D.},\n title = \"{A unified multiwavelength model of galaxy formation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = nov,\n volume = {462},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3854-3911},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw1888},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1509.08473},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.3854L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Yung2019b,\n author = {{Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Popping}, Gerg{\\\"o} and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Ferguson}, Harry C. and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel},\n title = \"{Semi-analytic forecasts for JWST - II. Physical properties and scaling relations for galaxies at z = 4-10}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshifts, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = dec,\n volume = {490},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2855-2879},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz2755},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1901.05964},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.2855Y},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Yung2019a,\n author = {{Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Popping}, Gerg{\\\"o} and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel},\n title = \"{Semi-analytic forecasts for JWST - I. UV luminosity functions at z = 4-10}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshifts, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = mar,\n volume = {483},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2983-3006},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty3241},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1803.09761},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.2983Y},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lu2012,\n author = {{Lu}, Yu and {Mo}, H.~J. and {Katz}, Neal and {Weinberg}, Martin D.},\n title = \"{Bayesian inference of galaxy formation from the K-band luminosity function of galaxies: tensions between theory and observation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, methods: statistical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = apr,\n volume = {421},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1779-1796},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20435.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1109.6658},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.421.1779L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kauffmann1993,\n author = {{Kauffmann}, G. and {White}, S.~D.~M. and {Guiderdoni}, B.},\n title = \"{The formation and evolution of galaxies within merging dark matter haloes.}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n year = 1993,\n month = sep,\n volume = {264},\n pages = {201-218},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/264.1.201},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993MNRAS.264..201K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Croton2016,\n author = {{Croton}, Darren J. and {Stevens}, Adam R.~H. and {Tonini}, Chiara and {Garel}, Thibault and {Bernyk}, Maksym and {Bibiano}, Antonio and {Hodkinson}, Luke and {Mutch}, Simon J. and {Poole}, Gregory B. and {Shattow}, Genevieve M.},\n title = \"{Semi-Analytic Galaxy Evolution (SAGE): Model Calibration and Basic Results}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: halos, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = feb,\n volume = {222},\n number = {2},\n eid = {22},\n pages = {22},\n doi = {10.3847/0067-0049/222/2/22},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1601.04709},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..222...22C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ayromlou2021,\n author = {{Ayromlou}, Mohammadreza and {Nelson}, Dylan and {Yates}, Robert M. and {Kauffmann}, Guinevere and {Renneby}, Malin and {White}, Simon D.~M.},\n title = \"{Comparing galaxy formation in the L-GALAXIES semi-analytical model and the IllustrisTNG simulations}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: analytical, methods: numerical, methods: observational, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2021,\n month = mar,\n volume = {502},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1051-1069},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa4011},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2004.14390},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.502.1051A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{GonzalesPerez2014,\n author = {{Gonzalez-Perez}, V. and {Lacey}, C.~G. and {Baugh}, C.~M. and {Lagos}, C.~D.~P. and {Helly}, J. and {Campbell}, D.~J.~R. and {Mitchell}, P.~D.},\n title = \"{How sensitive are predicted galaxy luminosities to the choice of stellar population synthesis model?}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {stars: AGB and post-AGB, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = mar,\n volume = {439},\n number = {1},\n pages = {264-283},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt2410},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1309.7057},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.439..264G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Cole2000,\n author = {{Cole}, Shaun and {Lacey}, Cedric G. and {Baugh}, Carlton M. and {Frenk}, Carlos S.},\n title = \"{Hierarchical galaxy formation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: FORMATION, Astrophysics},\n year = 2000,\n month = nov,\n volume = {319},\n number = {1},\n pages = {168-204},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03879.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0007281},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.319..168C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Henriques2020,\n author = {{Henriques}, Bruno M.~B. and {Yates}, Robert M. and {Fu}, Jian and {Guo}, Qi and {Kauffmann}, Guinevere and {Srisawat}, Chaichalit and {Thomas}, Peter A. and {White}, Simon D.~M.},\n title = \"{L-GALAXIES 2020: Spatially resolved cold gas phases, star formation, and chemical enrichment in galactic discs}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: analytical, methods: statistical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2020,\n month = feb,\n volume = {491},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5795-5814},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz3233},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2003.05944},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491.5795H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Baugh2006,\n author = {{Baugh}, C.~M.},\n title = \"{A primer on hierarchical galaxy formation: the semi-analytical approach}\",\n journal = {Reports on Progress in Physics},\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = dec,\n volume = {69},\n number = {12},\n pages = {3101-3156},\n doi = {10.1088/0034-4885/69/12/R02},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0610031},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006RPPh...69.3101B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Cole1991,\n author = {{Cole}, Shaun},\n title = \"{Modeling Galaxy Formation in Evolving Dark Matter Halos}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Dark Matter, Galactic Evolution, Halos, Red Shift, Star Formation, Astronomical Models, Cosmology, Monte Carlo Method, Astrophysics, DARK MATTER, GALAXIES: FORMATION},\n year = 1991,\n month = jan,\n volume = {367},\n pages = {45},\n doi = {10.1086/169600},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...367...45C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Henriques2009,\n author = {{Henriques}, Bruno M.~B. and {Thomas}, Peter A. and {Oliver}, Seb and {Roseboom}, Isaac},\n title = \"{Monte Carlo Markov Chain parameter estimation in semi-analytic models of galaxy formation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, methods: statistical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = jun,\n volume = {396},\n number = {1},\n pages = {535-547},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14730.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0810.2548},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.396..535H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Springel2005c,\n author = {{Springel}, Volker and {Di Matteo}, Tiziana and {Hernquist}, Lars},\n title = \"{Modelling feedback from stars and black holes in galaxy mergers}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: active, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: starburst, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = aug,\n volume = {361},\n number = {3},\n pages = {776-794},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09238.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0411108},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.361..776S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Springel2005b,\n author = {{Springel}, Volker and {White}, Simon D.~M. and {Jenkins}, Adrian and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {Yoshida}, Naoki and {Gao}, Liang and {Navarro}, Julio and {Thacker}, Robert and {Croton}, Darren and {Helly}, John and {Peacock}, John A. and {Cole}, Shaun and {Thomas}, Peter and {Couchman}, Hugh and {Evrard}, August and {Colberg}, J{\\\"o}rg and {Pearce}, Frazer},\n title = \"{Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = jun,\n volume = {435},\n number = {7042},\n pages = {629-636},\n doi = {10.1038/nature03597},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0504097},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Natur.435..629S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Prada2012,\n author = {{Prada}, Francisco and {Klypin}, Anatoly A. and {Cuesta}, Antonio J. and {Betancort-Rijo}, Juan E. and {Primack}, Joel},\n title = \"{Halo concentrations in the standard {\\ensuremath{\\Lambda}} cold dark matter cosmology}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, dark matter, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = jul,\n volume = {423},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3018-3030},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21007.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1104.5130},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423.3018P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Riebe2013,\n author = {{Riebe}, K. and {Partl}, A.~M. and {Enke}, H. and {Forero-Romero}, J. and {Gottl{\\\"o}ber}, S. and {Klypin}, A. and {Lemson}, G. and {Prada}, F. and {Primack}, J.~R. and {Steinmetz}, M. and {Turchaninov}, V.},\n title = \"{The MultiDark Database: Release of the Bolshoi and MultiDark cosmological simulations}\",\n journal = {Astronomische Nachrichten},\n keywords = {\\%simulation, cosmology, database, Virtual Observatory},\n year = 2013,\n month = aug,\n volume = {334},\n number = {7},\n pages = {691-708},\n doi = {10.1002/asna.201211900},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AN....334..691R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lovell2021,\n author = {{Lovell}, Christopher C. and {Vijayan}, Aswin P. and {Thomas}, Peter A. and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Barnes}, David J. and {Irodotou}, Dimitrios and {Roper}, Will},\n title = \"{First Light And Reionization Epoch Simulations (FLARES) - I. Environmental dependence of high-redshift galaxy evolution}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = jan,\n volume = {500},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2127-2145},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa3360},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2004.07283},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500.2127L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Pike2014,\n author = {{Pike}, Simon R. and {Kay}, Scott T. and {Newton}, Richard D.~A. and {Thomas}, Peter A. and {Jenkins}, Adrian},\n title = \"{Cosmological simulations of galaxy clusters with feedback from active galactic nuclei: profiles and scaling relations}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {hydrodynamics, methods: numerical, galaxies: clusters: general, X-rays: galaxies: clusters, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2014,\n month = dec,\n volume = {445},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1774-1796},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu1788},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1409.0723},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.1774P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Guo2013,\n author = {{Guo}, Qi and {White}, Simon and {Angulo}, Raul E. and {Henriques}, Bruno and {Lemson}, Gerard and {Boylan-Kolchin}, Michael and {Thomas}, Peter and {Short}, Chris},\n title = \"{Galaxy formation in WMAP1 and WMAP7 cosmologies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: haloes, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, cosmology: theory, cosmology: dark matter, cosmology: large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = jan,\n volume = {428},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1351-1365},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sts115},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1206.0052},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.428.1351G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bhowmick2018,\n author = {{Bhowmick}, Aklant K. and {Campbell}, Duncan and {Di Matteo}, Tiziana and {Feng}, Yu},\n title = \"{Halo occupation distribution (HOD) modelling of high redshift galaxies using the BlueTides simulation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: statistics, cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = nov,\n volume = {480},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3177-3192},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty2128},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1806.10612},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.3177B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Feng2016,\n author = {{Feng}, Yu and {Di-Matteo}, Tiziana and {Croft}, Rupert A. and {Bird}, Simeon and {Battaglia}, Nicholas and {Wilkins}, Stephen},\n title = \"{The BlueTides simulation: first galaxies and reionization}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Galaxy: formation, dark ages, reionization, first stars, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = jan,\n volume = {455},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2778-2791},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv2484},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1504.06619},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455.2778F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Cueto2024,\n author = {{Cueto}, Elie R. and {Hutter}, Anne and {Dayal}, Pratika and {Gottl{\\\"o}ber}, Stefan and {Heintz}, Kasper E. and {Mason}, Charlotte and {Trebitsch}, Maxime and {Yepes}, Gustavo},\n title = \"{ASTRAEUS. IX. Impact of an evolving stellar initial mass function on early galaxies and reionisation}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, stars: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, intergalactic medium, dark ages, reionization, first stars, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = jun,\n volume = {686},\n eid = {A138},\n pages = {A138},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202349017},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2312.12109},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A.138C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Katz2023,\n author = {{Katz}, Harley and {Rosdahl}, Joki and {Kimm}, Taysun and {Blaizot}, Jeremy and {Choustikov}, Nicholas and {Farcy}, Marion and {Garel}, Thibault and {Haehnelt}, Martin G. and {Michel-Dansac}, Leo and {Ocvirk}, Pierre},\n title = \"{The SPHINX Public Data Release: Forward Modelling High-Redshift JWST Observations with Cosmological Radiation Hydrodynamics Simulations}\",\n journal = {The Open Journal of Astrophysics},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = dec,\n volume = {6},\n eid = {44},\n pages = {44},\n doi = {10.21105/astro.2309.03269},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2309.03269},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023OJAp....6E..44K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Pawlik2017,\n author = {{Pawlik}, Andreas H. and {Rahmati}, Alireza and {Schaye}, Joop and {Jeon}, Myoungwon and {Dalla Vecchia}, Claudio},\n title = \"{The Aurora radiation-hydrodynamical simulations of reionization: calibration and first results}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {radiative transfer, methods: numerical, H II regions, galaxies: high-redshift, intergalactic medium, dark ages, reionization, first stars, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = apr,\n volume = {466},\n number = {1},\n pages = {960-973},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw2869},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1603.00034},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466..960P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Bhagwat2024,\n author = {{Bhagwat}, Aniket and {Costa}, Tiago and {Ciardi}, Benedetta and {Pakmor}, R{\\\"u}diger and {Garaldi}, Enrico},\n title = \"{SPICE: the connection between cosmic reionization and stellar feedback in the first galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jul,\n volume = {531},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3406-3430},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae1125},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2310.16895},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531.3406B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{Trebitsch2021,\n author = {{Trebitsch}, Maxime and {Dubois}, Yohan and {Volonteri}, Marta and {Pfister}, Hugo and {Cadiou}, Corentin and {Katz}, Harley and {Rosdahl}, Joakim and {Kimm}, Taysun and {Pichon}, Christophe and {Beckmann}, Ricarda S. and {Devriendt}, Julien and {Slyz}, Adrianne},\n title = \"{The OBELISK simulation: Galaxies contribute more than AGN to H I reionization of protoclusters}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, intergalactic medium, quasars: supermassive black holes, dark ages, reionization, first stars, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2021,\n month = sep,\n volume = {653},\n eid = {A154},\n pages = {A154},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202037698},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2002.04045},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653A.154T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n%---- Horizon-AGN\n\n@ARTICLE{Dubois2014,\n author = {{Dubois}, Y. and {Pichon}, C. and {Welker}, C. and {Le Borgne}, D. and {Devriendt}, J. and {Laigle}, C. and {Codis}, S. and {Pogosyan}, D. and {Arnouts}, S. and {Benabed}, K. and {Bertin}, E. and {Blaizot}, J. and {Bouchet}, F. and {Cardoso}, J. -F. and {Colombi}, S. and {de Lapparent}, V. and {Desjacques}, V. and {Gavazzi}, R. and {Kassin}, S. and {Kimm}, T. and {McCracken}, H. and {Milliard}, B. and {Peirani}, S. and {Prunet}, S. and {Rouberol}, S. and {Silk}, J. and {Slyz}, A. and {Sousbie}, T. and {Teyssier}, R. and {Tresse}, L. and {Treyer}, M. and {Vibert}, D. and {Volonteri}, M.},\n title = \"{Dancing in the dark: galactic properties trace spin swings along the cosmic web}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = oct,\n volume = {444},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1453-1468},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu1227},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1402.1165},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.444.1453D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Teyssier2002,\n author = {{Teyssier}, R.},\n title = \"{Cosmological hydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement. A new high resolution code called RAMSES}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {GRAVITATION, HYDRODYNAMICS, METHODS: NUMERICAL, COSMOLOGY: THEORY, COSMOLOGY: LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSE, Astrophysics},\n year = 2002,\n month = apr,\n volume = {385},\n pages = {337-364},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20011817},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0111367},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...385..337T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Laigle2019,\n author = {{Laigle}, C. and {Davidzon}, I. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Devriendt}, J. and {Kashino}, D. and {Pichon}, C. and {Capak}, P. and {Arnouts}, S. and {de la Torre}, S. and {Dubois}, Y. and {Gozaliasl}, G. and {Le Borgne}, D. and {Lilly}, S. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Salvato}, M. and {Slyz}, A.},\n title = \"{Horizon-AGN virtual observatory - 1. SED-fitting performance and forecasts for future imaging surveys}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: observational, techniques: photometric, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2019,\n month = jul,\n volume = {486},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5104-5123},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz1054},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1903.10934},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486.5104L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Gouin2019,\n author = {{Gouin}, C. and {Gavazzi}, R. and {Pichon}, C. and {Dubois}, Y. and {Laigle}, C. and {Chisari}, N.~E. and {Codis}, S. and {Devriendt}, J. and {Peirani}, S.},\n title = \"{Weak lensing in the Horizon-AGN simulation lightcone. Small-scale baryonic effects}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {large-scale structure of Universe, gravitational lensing: weak, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2019,\n month = jun,\n volume = {626},\n eid = {A72},\n pages = {A72},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201834199},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1904.07905},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...626A..72G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Aubert2004,\n author = {{Aubert}, D. and {Pichon}, C. and {Colombi}, S.},\n title = \"{The origin and implications of dark matter anisotropic cosmic infall on \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitildeL$_{*}$ haloes}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, dark matter, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = aug,\n volume = {352},\n number = {2},\n pages = {376-398},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07883.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0402405},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.352..376A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Kaviraj2017,\n author = {{Kaviraj}, S. and {Laigle}, C. and {Kimm}, T. and {Devriendt}, J.~E.~G. and {Dubois}, Y. and {Pichon}, C. and {Slyz}, A. and {Chisari}, E. and {Peirani}, S.},\n title = \"{The Horizon-AGN simulation: evolution of galaxy properties over cosmic time}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = jun,\n volume = {467},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4739-4752},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx126},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1605.09379},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.4739K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n%---- TNG-100\n\n@ARTICLE{Pillepich2018,\n author = {{Pillepich}, Annalisa and {Nelson}, Dylan and {Hernquist}, Lars and {Springel}, Volker and {Pakmor}, R{\\\"u}diger and {Torrey}, Paul and {Weinberger}, Rainer and {Genel}, Shy and {Naiman}, Jill P. and {Marinacci}, Federico and {Vogelsberger}, Mark},\n title = \"{First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the stellar mass content of groups and clusters of galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: general, galaxies: groups: general, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = mar,\n volume = {475},\n number = {1},\n pages = {648-675},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx3112},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1707.03406},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475..648P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Nelson2018,\n author = {{Nelson}, Dylan and {Pillepich}, Annalisa and {Springel}, Volker and {Weinberger}, Rainer and {Hernquist}, Lars and {Pakmor}, R{\\\"u}diger and {Genel}, Shy and {Torrey}, Paul and {Vogelsberger}, Mark and {Kauffmann}, Guinevere and {Marinacci}, Federico and {Naiman}, Jill},\n title = \"{First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the galaxy colour bimodality}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = mar,\n volume = {475},\n number = {1},\n pages = {624-647},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx3040},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1707.03395},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475..624N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Marinacci2018,\n author = {{Marinacci}, Federico and {Vogelsberger}, Mark and {Pakmor}, R{\\\"u}diger and {Torrey}, Paul and {Springel}, Volker and {Hernquist}, Lars and {Nelson}, Dylan and {Weinberger}, Rainer and {Pillepich}, Annalisa and {Naiman}, Jill and {Genel}, Shy},\n title = \"{First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: radio haloes and magnetic fields}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {magnetic fields, MHD, methods: numerical, galaxies: clusters: general, cosmology: theory, radio continuum: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = nov,\n volume = {480},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5113-5139},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty2206},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1707.03396},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.5113M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Naiman2018,\n author = {{Naiman}, Jill P. and {Pillepich}, Annalisa and {Springel}, Volker and {Ramirez-Ruiz}, Enrico and {Torrey}, Paul and {Vogelsberger}, Mark and {Pakmor}, R{\\\"u}diger and {Nelson}, Dylan and {Marinacci}, Federico and {Hernquist}, Lars and {Weinberger}, Rainer and {Genel}, Shy},\n title = \"{First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: a tale of two elements - chemical evolution of magnesium and europium}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, Galaxy: formation, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = jun,\n volume = {477},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1206-1224},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty618},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1707.03401},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.1206N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Springel2018,\n author = {{Springel}, Volker and {Pakmor}, R{\\\"u}diger and {Pillepich}, Annalisa and {Weinberger}, Rainer and {Nelson}, Dylan and {Hernquist}, Lars and {Vogelsberger}, Mark and {Genel}, Shy and {Torrey}, Paul and {Marinacci}, Federico and {Naiman}, Jill},\n title = \"{First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: matter and galaxy clustering}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxy formation, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = mar,\n volume = {475},\n number = {1},\n pages = {676-698},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx3304},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1707.03397},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475..676S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Springel2010,\n author = {{Springel}, Volker},\n title = \"{E pur si muove: Galilean-invariant cosmological hydrodynamical simulations on a moving mesh}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: interactions, cosmology: dark matter, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = jan,\n volume = {401},\n number = {2},\n pages = {791-851},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15715.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0901.4107},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.401..791S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Davis1985,\n author = {{Davis}, M. and {Efstathiou}, G. and {Frenk}, C.~S. and {White}, S.~D.~M.},\n title = \"{The evolution of large-scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Computational Astrophysics, Cosmology, Galactic Clusters, Galactic Evolution, Missing Mass (Astrophysics), Weak Interactions (Field Theory), Astronomical Models, Computerized Simulation, Correlation, Many Body Problem, Mass Distribution, Mass To Light Ratios, Matter (Physics), Radial Velocity, Red Shift, Astrophysics},\n year = 1985,\n month = may,\n volume = {292},\n pages = {371-394},\n doi = {10.1086/163168},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...292..371D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Planck2016,\n author = {{Planck Collaboration} and {Ade}, P.~A.~R. and {Aghanim}, N. and {Arnaud}, M. and {Ashdown}, M. and {Aumont}, J. and {Baccigalupi}, C. and {Banday}, A.~J. and {Barreiro}, R.~B. and {Bartlett}, J.~G. and {Bartolo}, N. and {Battaner}, E. and {Battye}, R. and {Benabed}, K. and {Beno{\\^\\i}t}, A. and {Benoit-L{\\'e}vy}, A. and {Bernard}, J. -P. and {Bersanelli}, M. and {Bielewicz}, P. and {Bock}, J.~J. and {Bonaldi}, A. and {Bonavera}, L. and {Bond}, J.~R. and {Borrill}, J. and {Bouchet}, F.~R. and {Boulanger}, F. and {Bucher}, M. and {Burigana}, C. and {Butler}, R.~C. and {Calabrese}, E. and {Cardoso}, J. -F. and {Catalano}, A. and {Challinor}, A. and {Chamballu}, A. and {Chary}, R. -R. and {Chiang}, H.~C. and {Chluba}, J. and {Christensen}, P.~R. and {Church}, S. and {Clements}, D.~L. and {Colombi}, S. and {Colombo}, L.~P.~L. and {Combet}, C. and {Coulais}, A. and {Crill}, B.~P. and {Curto}, A. and {Cuttaia}, F. and {Danese}, L. and {Davies}, R.~D. and {Davis}, R.~J. and {de Bernardis}, P. and {de Rosa}, A. and {de Zotti}, G. and {Delabrouille}, J. and {D{\\'e}sert}, F. -X. and {Di Valentino}, E. and {Dickinson}, C. and {Diego}, J.~M. and {Dolag}, K. and {Dole}, H. and {Donzelli}, S. and {Dor{\\'e}}, O. and {Douspis}, M. and {Ducout}, A. and {Dunkley}, J. and {Dupac}, X. and {Efstathiou}, G. and {Elsner}, F. and {En{\\ss}lin}, T.~A. and {Eriksen}, H.~K. and {Farhang}, M. and {Fergusson}, J. and {Finelli}, F. and {Forni}, O. and {Frailis}, M. and {Fraisse}, A.~A. and {Franceschi}, E. and {Frejsel}, A. and {Galeotta}, S. and {Galli}, S. and {Ganga}, K. and {Gauthier}, C. and {Gerbino}, M. and {Ghosh}, T. and {Giard}, M. and {Giraud-H{\\'e}raud}, Y. and {Giusarma}, E. and {Gjerl{\\o}w}, E. and {Gonz{\\'a}lez-Nuevo}, J. and {G{\\'o}rski}, K.~M. and {Gratton}, S. and {Gregorio}, A. and {Gruppuso}, A. and {Gudmundsson}, J.~E. and {Hamann}, J. and {Hansen}, F.~K. and {Hanson}, D. and {Harrison}, D.~L. and {Helou}, G. and {Henrot-Versill{\\'e}}, S. and {Hern{\\'a}ndez-Monteagudo}, C. and {Herranz}, D. and {Hildebrandt}, S.~R. and {Hivon}, E. and {Hobson}, M. and {Holmes}, W.~A. and {Hornstrup}, A. and {Hovest}, W. and {Huang}, Z. and {Huffenberger}, K.~M. and {Hurier}, G. and {Jaffe}, A.~H. and {Jaffe}, T.~R. and {Jones}, W.~C. and {Juvela}, M. and {Keih{\\\"a}nen}, E. and {Keskitalo}, R. and {Kisner}, T.~S. and {Kneissl}, R. and {Knoche}, J. and {Knox}, L. and {Kunz}, M. and {Kurki-Suonio}, H. and {Lagache}, G. and {L{\\\"a}hteenm{\\\"a}ki}, A. and {Lamarre}, J. -M. and {Lasenby}, A. and {Lattanzi}, M. and {Lawrence}, C.~R. and {Leahy}, J.~P. and {Leonardi}, R. and {Lesgourgues}, J. and {Levrier}, F. and {Lewis}, A. and {Liguori}, M. and {Lilje}, P.~B. and {Linden-V{\\o}rnle}, M. and {L{\\'o}pez-Caniego}, M. and {Lubin}, P.~M. and {Mac{\\'\\i}as-P{\\'e}rez}, J.~F. and {Maggio}, G. and {Maino}, D. and {Mandolesi}, N. and {Mangilli}, A. and {Marchini}, A. and {Maris}, M. and {Martin}, P.~G. and {Martinelli}, M. and {Mart{\\'\\i}nez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, E. and {Masi}, S. and {Matarrese}, S. and {McGehee}, P. and {Meinhold}, P.~R. and {Melchiorri}, A. and {Melin}, J. -B. and {Mendes}, L. and {Mennella}, A. and {Migliaccio}, M. and {Millea}, M. and {Mitra}, S. and {Miville-Desch{\\^e}nes}, M. -A. and {Moneti}, A. and {Montier}, L. and {Morgante}, G. and {Mortlock}, D. and {Moss}, A. and {Munshi}, D. and {Murphy}, J.~A. and {Naselsky}, P. and {Nati}, F. and {Natoli}, P. and {Netterfield}, C.~B. and {N{\\o}rgaard-Nielsen}, H.~U. and {Noviello}, F. and {Novikov}, D. and {Novikov}, I. and {Oxborrow}, C.~A. and {Paci}, F. and {Pagano}, L. and {Pajot}, F. and {Paladini}, R. and {Paoletti}, D. and {Partridge}, B. and {Pasian}, F. and {Patanchon}, G. and {Pearson}, T.~J. and {Perdereau}, O. and {Perotto}, L. and {Perrotta}, F. and {Pettorino}, V. and {Piacentini}, F. and {Piat}, M. and {Pierpaoli}, E. and {Pietrobon}, D. and {Plaszczynski}, S. and {Pointecouteau}, E. and {Polenta}, G. and {Popa}, L. and {Pratt}, G.~W. and {Pr{\\'e}zeau}, G. and {Prunet}, S. and {Puget}, J. -L. and {Rachen}, J.~P. and {Reach}, W.~T. and {Rebolo}, R. and {Reinecke}, M. and {Remazeilles}, M. and {Renault}, C. and {Renzi}, A. and {Ristorcelli}, I. and {Rocha}, G. and {Rosset}, C. and {Rossetti}, M. and {Roudier}, G. and {Rouill{\\'e} d'Orfeuil}, B. and {Rowan-Robinson}, M. and {Rubi{\\~n}o-Mart{\\'\\i}n}, J.~A. and {Rusholme}, B. and {Said}, N. and {Salvatelli}, V. and {Salvati}, L. and {Sandri}, M. and {Santos}, D. and {Savelainen}, M. and {Savini}, G. and {Scott}, D. and {Seiffert}, M.~D. and {Serra}, P. and {Shellard}, E.~P.~S. and {Spencer}, L.~D. and {Spinelli}, M. and {Stolyarov}, V. and {Stompor}, R. and {Sudiwala}, R. and {Sunyaev}, R. and {Sutton}, D. and {Suur-Uski}, A. -S. and {Sygnet}, J. -F. and {Tauber}, J.~A. and {Terenzi}, L. and {Toffolatti}, L. and {Tomasi}, M. and {Tristram}, M. and {Trombetti}, T. and {Tucci}, M. and {Tuovinen}, J. and {T{\\\"u}rler}, M. and {Umana}, G. and {Valenziano}, L. and {Valiviita}, J. and {Van Tent}, F. and {Vielva}, P. and {Villa}, F. and {Wade}, L.~A. and {Wandelt}, B.~D. and {Wehus}, I.~K. and {White}, M. and {White}, S.~D.~M. and {Wilkinson}, A. and {Yvon}, D. and {Zacchei}, A. and {Zonca}, A.},\n title = \"{Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, cosmology: theory, cosmic background radiation, cosmological parameters, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = sep,\n volume = {594},\n eid = {A13},\n pages = {A13},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201525830},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1502.01589},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...594A..13P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Komatsu2011,\n author = {{Komatsu}, E. and {Smith}, K.~M. and {Dunkley}, J. and {Bennett}, C.~L. and {Gold}, B. and {Hinshaw}, G. and {Jarosik}, N. and {Larson}, D. and {Nolta}, M.~R. and {Page}, L. and {Spergel}, D.~N. and {Halpern}, M. and {Hill}, R.~S. and {Kogut}, A. and {Limon}, M. and {Meyer}, S.~S. and {Odegard}, N. and {Tucker}, G.~S. and {Weiland}, J.~L. and {Wollack}, E. and {Wright}, E.~L.},\n title = \"{Seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {cosmic background radiation, cosmology: observations, dark matter, early universe, space vehicles, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = feb,\n volume = {192},\n number = {2},\n eid = {18},\n pages = {18},\n doi = {10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1001.4538},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..192...18K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n%--- FirstLight\n\n@ARTICLE{Ceverino2017,\n author = {{Ceverino}, Daniel and {Glover}, Simon C.~O. and {Klessen}, Ralf S.},\n title = \"{Introducing the FirstLight project: UV luminosity function and scaling relations of primeval galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = sep,\n volume = {470},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2791-2798},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx1386},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1703.02913},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.2791C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Ceverino2009,\n author = {{Ceverino}, Daniel and {Klypin}, Anatoly},\n title = \"{The Role of Stellar Feedback in the Formation of Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, hydrodynamics, ISM: general, methods: N-body simulations, stars: formation, Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = apr,\n volume = {695},\n number = {1},\n pages = {292-309},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/292},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0712.3285},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...695..292C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Kravtsov1997,\n author = {{Kravtsov}, Andrey V. and {Klypin}, Anatoly A. and {Khokhlov}, Alexei M.},\n title = \"{Adaptive Refinement Tree: A New High-Resolution N-Body Code for Cosmological Simulations}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {METHODS: NUMERICAL, COSMOLOGY: THEORY, COSMOLOGY: DARK MATTER, Methods: Numerical, Cosmology: Theory, Cosmology: Dark Matter, Astrophysics, Physics - Computational Physics},\n year = 1997,\n month = jul,\n volume = {111},\n number = {1},\n pages = {73-94},\n doi = {10.1086/313015},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9701195},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJS..111...73K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n%--- Thesan\n\n@ARTICLE{Kannan2022,\n author = {{Kannan}, R. and {Garaldi}, E. and {Smith}, A. and {Pakmor}, R. and {Springel}, V. and {Vogelsberger}, M. and {Hernquist}, L.},\n title = \"{Introducing the THESAN project: radiation-magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the epoch of reionization}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {radiative transfer, methods: numerical, galaxies: high-redshift, dark ages, reionization, first stars, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2022,\n month = apr,\n volume = {511},\n number = {3},\n pages = {4005-4030},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stab3710},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2110.00584},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.511.4005K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n%--- CoDa\n\n@ARTICLE{Lewis2022,\n author = {{Lewis}, Joseph S.~W. and {Ocvirk}, Pierre and {Sorce}, Jenny G. and {Dubois}, Yohan and {Aubert}, Dominique and {Conaboy}, Luke and {Shapiro}, Paul R. and {Dawoodbhoy}, Taha and {Teyssier}, Romain and {Yepes}, Gustavo and {Gottl{\\\"o}ber}, Stefan and {Rasera}, Yann and {Ahn}, Kyungjin and {Iliev}, Ilian T. and {Park}, Hyunbae and {Th{\\'e}lie}, {\\'E}milie},\n title = \"{The short ionizing photon mean free path at z = 6 in Cosmic Dawn III, a new fully coupled radiation-hydrodynamical simulation of the Epoch of Reionization}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: high-redshift, dark ages, reionization, first stars, intergalactic medium, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2022,\n month = nov,\n volume = {516},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3389-3397},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac2383},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2202.05869},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.3389L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Ocvirk2020,\n author = {{Ocvirk}, Pierre and {Aubert}, Dominique and {Sorce}, Jenny G. and {Shapiro}, Paul R. and {Deparis}, Nicolas and {Dawoodbhoy}, Taha and {Lewis}, Joseph and {Teyssier}, Romain and {Yepes}, Gustavo and {Gottl{\\\"o}ber}, Stefan and {Ahn}, Kyungjin and {Iliev}, Ilian T. and {Hoffman}, Yehuda},\n title = \"{Cosmic Dawn II (CoDa II): a new radiation-hydrodynamics simulation of the self-consistent coupling of galaxy formation and reionization}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: formation, Local Group, Intergalactic medium, Radiative transfer, radiative transfer, intergalactic medium, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2020,\n month = aug,\n volume = {496},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4087-4107},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa1266},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1811.11192},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.496.4087O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Ocvirk2016,\n author = {{Ocvirk}, Pierre and {Gillet}, Nicolas and {Shapiro}, Paul R. and {Aubert}, Dominique and {Iliev}, Ilian T. and {Teyssier}, Romain and {Yepes}, Gustavo and {Choi}, Jun-Hwan and {Sullivan}, David and {Knebe}, Alexander and {Gottl{\\\"o}ber}, Stefan and {D'Aloisio}, Anson and {Park}, Hyunbae and {Hoffman}, Yehuda and {Stranex}, Timothy},\n title = \"{Cosmic Dawn (CoDa): the First Radiation-Hydrodynamics Simulation of Reionization and Galaxy Formation in the Local Universe}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {reionization, intergalactic medium, galaxies: formation, high redshift, luminosity function, Local Group, radiative transfer, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = dec,\n volume = {463},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1462-1485},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw2036},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1511.00011},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.463.1462O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n%---------------------------------- Introduction ----------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{Cattaneo2006,\n author = {{Cattaneo}, A. and {Dekel}, A. and {Devriendt}, J. and {Guiderdoni}, B. and {Blaizot}, J.},\n title = \"{Modelling the galaxy bimodality: shutdown above a critical halo mass}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {shock waves: cooling flows: galaxies: evolution: galaxies: formation: galaxies: haloes: galaxies: ISM, shock waves, cooling flows, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: ISM, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = aug,\n volume = {370},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1651-1665},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10608.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0601295},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.370.1651C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bond1996,\n author = {{Bond}, J. Richard and {Kofman}, Lev and {Pogosyan}, Dmitry},\n title = \"{How filaments of galaxies are woven into the cosmic web}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n year = 1996,\n month = apr,\n volume = {380},\n number = {6575},\n pages = {603-606},\n doi = {10.1038/380603a0},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9512141},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996Natur.380..603B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Einstein1917,\n author = {{Einstein}, Albert},\n title = \"{Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativit{\\\"a}tstheorie}\",\n journal = {Sitzungsberichte der K\\öniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften},\n year = 1917,\n month = jan,\n pages = {142-152},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1917SPAW.......142E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Pontoppidan2022,\n author = {{Pontoppidan}, Klaus M. and {Barrientes}, Jaclyn and {Blome}, Claire and {Braun}, Hannah and {Brown}, Matthew and {Carruthers}, Margaret and {Coe}, Dan and {DePasquale}, Joseph and {Espinoza}, N{\\'e}stor and {Marin}, Macarena Garcia and {Gordon}, Karl D. and {Henry}, Alaina and {Hustak}, Leah and {James}, Andi and {Jenkins}, Ann and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {LaMassa}, Stephanie and {Law}, David and {Lockwood}, Alexandra and {Moro-Martin}, Amaya and {Mullally}, Susan E. and {Pagan}, Alyssa and {Player}, Dani and {Proffitt}, Charles and {Pulliam}, Christine and {Ramsay}, Leah and {Ravindranath}, Swara and {Reid}, Neill and {Robberto}, Massimo and {Sabbi}, Elena and {Ubeda}, Leonardo and {Balogh}, Michael and {Flanagan}, Kathryn and {Gardner}, Jonathan and {Hasan}, Hashima and {Meinke}, Bonnie and {Nota}, Antonella},\n title = \"{The JWST Early Release Observations}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Astronomy education, High-redshift galaxy clusters, Exoplanet atmospheres, Star forming regions, Planetary nebulae, Apparent position, 2165, 2007, 487, 1565, 1249, 60, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2022,\n month = sep,\n volume = {936},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L14},\n pages = {L14},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ac8a4e},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2207.13067},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...936L..14P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Adams2023,\n author = {{Adams}, N.~J. and {Conselice}, C.~J. and {Ferreira}, L. and {Austin}, D. and {Trussler}, J.~A.~A. and {Juod{\\v{z}}balis}, I. and {Wilkins}, S.~M. and {Caruana}, J. and {Dayal}, P. and {Verma}, A. and {Vijayan}, A.~P.},\n title = \"{Discovery and properties of ultra-high redshift galaxies (9 < z < 12) in the JWST ERO SMACS 0723 Field}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = jan,\n volume = {518},\n number = {3},\n pages = {4755-4766},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac3347},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2207.11217},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.4755A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lemaitre1927,\n author = {{Lema{\\^\\i}tre}, G.},\n title = \"{Un Univers homog{\\`e}ne de masse constante et de rayon croissant rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des n{\\'e}buleuses extra-galactiques}\",\n journal = {Annales de la Soci{\\'e}t{\\'e} Scientifique de Bruxelles},\n keywords = {cosmology, big-bang theory},\n year = 1927,\n month = jan,\n volume = {47},\n pages = {49-59},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1927ASSB...47...49L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Man&Belli2018,\n author = {{Man}, Allison and {Belli}, Sirio},\n title = \"{Star formation quenching in massive galaxies}\",\n journal = {Nature Astronomy},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = sep,\n volume = {2},\n pages = {695-697},\n doi = {10.1038/s41550-018-0558-1},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1809.00722},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018NatAs...2..695M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Smith2003,\n author = {{Smith}, R.~E. and {Peacock}, J.~A. and {Jenkins}, A. and {White}, S.~D.~M. and {Frenk}, C.~S. and {Pearce}, F.~R. and {Thomas}, P.~A. and {Efstathiou}, G. and {Couchman}, H.~M.~P.},\n title = \"{Stable clustering, the halo model and non-linear cosmological power spectra}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: N-body simulations, cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = jun,\n volume = {341},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1311-1332},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06503.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0207664},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.341.1311S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Peacock&Smith2000,\n author = {{Peacock}, J.~A. and {Smith}, R.~E.},\n title = \"{Halo occupation numbers and galaxy bias}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERAL, COSMOLOGY: THEORY, LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSE, Astrophysics},\n year = 2000,\n month = nov,\n volume = {318},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1144-1156},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03779.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0005010},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.318.1144P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kravstov2004,\n author = {{Kravtsov}, Andrey V. and {Berlind}, Andreas A. and {Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Klypin}, Anatoly A. and {Gottl{\\\"o}ber}, Stefan and {Allgood}, Brandon and {Primack}, Joel R.},\n title = \"{The Dark Side of the Halo Occupation Distribution}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Formation, Galaxies: Halos, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Methods: Numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = jul,\n volume = {609},\n number = {1},\n pages = {35-49},\n doi = {10.1086/420959},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0308519},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...609...35K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bower2006,\n author = {{Bower}, R.~G. and {Benson}, A.~J. and {Malbon}, R. and {Helly}, J.~C. and {Frenk}, C.~S. and {Baugh}, C.~M. and {Cole}, S. and {Lacey}, C.~G.},\n title = \"{Breaking the hierarchy of galaxy formation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution: galaxies: formation: galaxies: luminosity function, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: luminosity function, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = aug,\n volume = {370},\n number = {2},\n pages = {645-655},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10519.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0511338},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.370..645B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Groth&Peebles1977,\n author = {{Groth}, E.~J. and {Peebles}, P.~J.~E.},\n title = \"{Statistical analysis of catalogs of extragalactic objects. VII. Two- and three-point correlation functions for the high-resolution Shane-Wirtanen catalog of galaxies.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Astronomical Catalogs, Galactic Clusters, Statistical Correlation, Astronomical Photography, Autocorrelation, Cosmology, Error Analysis, Photographic Plates, Red Shift, Relativity, Scaling Laws, Astrophysics},\n year = 1977,\n month = oct,\n volume = {217},\n pages = {385-405},\n doi = {10.1086/155588},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ApJ...217..385G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Davis&Peebles1983,\n author = {{Davis}, M. and {Peebles}, P.~J.~E.},\n title = \"{A survey of galaxy redshifts. V. The two-point position and velocity correlations.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology, Galactic Clusters, Galaxies, Red Shift, Correlation, Line Of Sight, Mass Distribution, Position (Location), Velocity Distribution, Astrophysics},\n year = 1983,\n month = apr,\n volume = {267},\n pages = {465-482},\n doi = {10.1086/160884},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...267..465D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tosuji&Kihara1969,\n author = {{Totsuji}, H. and {Kihara}, T.},\n title = \"{The Correlation Function for the Distribution of Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\pasj},\n year = 1969,\n month = jan,\n volume = {21},\n pages = {221},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969PASJ...21..221T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lacey&Cole1993,\n author = {{Lacey}, Cedric and {Cole}, Shaun},\n title = \"{Merger rates in hierarchical models of galaxy formation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astronomical Models, Galactic Evolution, Galactic Halos, Interacting Galaxies, Baryons, Dark Matter, Gravitational Effects, Monte Carlo Method, Astrophysics},\n year = 1993,\n month = jun,\n volume = {262},\n number = {3},\n pages = {627-649},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/262.3.627},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993MNRAS.262..627L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n%---------------------------------- Diverse ----------------------------------\n@software{Bradley2024,\n author = {Larry Bradley and\n Brigitta Sip{\\H o}cz and\n Thomas Robitaille and\n Erik Tollerud and\n Z\\`e Vin{\\'{\\i}}cius and\n Christoph Deil and\n Kyle Barbary and\n Tom J Wilson and\n Ivo Busko and\n Axel Donath and\n Hans Moritz G{\\\"u}nther and\n Mihai Cara and\n P. L. Lim and\n Sebastian Me{\\ss}linger and\n Simon Conseil and\n Zach Burnett and\n Azalee Bostroem and\n Michael Droettboom and\n E. M. Bray and\n Lars Andersen Bratholm and\n Adam Ginsburg and\n William Jamieson and\n Geert Barentsen and\n Matt Craig and\n Brett M. Morris and\n Marshall Perrin and\n Shivangee Rathi and\n Sergio Pascual and\n Iskren Y. Georgiev},\n title = {astropy/photutils: 2.0.2},\n month = oct,\n year = 2024,\n publisher = {Zenodo},\n version = {2.0.2},\n doi = {10.5281/zenodo.13989456},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13989456},\n}\n@INPROCEEDINGS{Perrin2012,\n author = {{Perrin}, Marshall D. and {Soummer}, R{\\'e}mi and {Elliott}, Erin M. and {Lallo}, Matthew D. and {Sivaramakrishnan}, Anand},\n title = \"{Simulating point spread functions for the James Webb Space Telescope with WebbPSF}\",\n booktitle = {Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2012: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave},\n year = 2012,\n editor = {{Clampin}, Mark C. and {Fazio}, Giovanni G. and {MacEwen}, Howard A. and {Oschmann}, Jr., Jacobus M.},\n series = {Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series},\n volume = {8442},\n month = sep,\n eid = {84423D},\n pages = {84423D},\n doi = {10.1117/12.925230},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012SPIE.8442E..3DP},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Coe2012,\n author = {{Coe}, Dan and {Umetsu}, Keiichi and {Zitrin}, Adi and {Donahue}, Megan and {Medezinski}, Elinor and {Postman}, Marc and {Carrasco}, Mauricio and {Anguita}, Timo and {Geller}, Margaret J. and {Rines}, Kenneth J. and {Diaferio}, Antonaldo and {Kurtz}, Michael J. and {Bradley}, Larry and {Koekemoer}, Anton and {Zheng}, Wei and {Nonino}, Mario and {Molino}, Alberto and {Mahdavi}, Andisheh and {Lemze}, Doron and {Infante}, Leopoldo and {Ogaz}, Sara and {Melchior}, Peter and {Host}, Ole and {Ford}, Holland and {Grillo}, Claudio and {Rosati}, Piero and {Jim{\\'e}nez-Teja}, Yolanda and {Moustakas}, John and {Broadhurst}, Tom and {Ascaso}, Bego{\\~n}a and {Lahav}, Ofer and {Bartelmann}, Matthias and {Ben{\\'\\i}tez}, Narciso and {Bouwens}, Rychard and {Graur}, Or and {Graves}, Genevieve and {Jha}, Saurabh and {Jouvel}, Stephanie and {Kelson}, Daniel and {Moustakas}, Leonidas and {Maoz}, Dan and {Meneghetti}, Massimo and {Merten}, Julian and {Riess}, Adam and {Rodney}, Steve and {Seitz}, Stella},\n title = \"{CLASH: Precise New Constraints on the Mass Profile of the Galaxy Cluster A2261}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark energy, dark matter, galaxies: clusters: individual: Abell 2261, galaxies: evolution, gravitational lensing: strong, gravitational lensing: weak, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = sep,\n volume = {757},\n number = {1},\n eid = {22},\n pages = {22},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/22},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1201.1616},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757...22C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bullock2001b,\n author = {{Bullock}, J.~S. and {Kolatt}, T.~S. and {Sigad}, Y. and {Somerville}, R.~S. and {Kravtsov}, A.~V. and {Klypin}, A.~A. and {Primack}, J.~R. and {Dekel}, A.},\n title = \"{Profiles of dark haloes: evolution, scatter and environment}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: FORMATION, GALAXIES: STRUCTURE, COSMOLOGY: THEORY, DARK MATTER, galaxies: formation, galaxies: structure, cosmology: theory, dark matter, Astrophysics},\n year = 2001,\n month = mar,\n volume = {321},\n number = {3},\n pages = {559-575},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04068.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9908159},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.321..559B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bullock2001,\n author = {{Bullock}, James S. and {Kravtsov}, Andrey V. and {Weinberg}, David H.},\n title = \"{Hierarchical Galaxy Formation and Substructure in the Galaxy's Stellar Halo}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Formation, Galaxy: Formation, Galaxy: Halo, Astrophysics},\n year = 2001,\n month = feb,\n volume = {548},\n number = {1},\n pages = {33-46},\n doi = {10.1086/318681},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0007295},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...548...33B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ucci2021,\n author = {{Ucci}, Graziano and {Dayal}, Pratika and {Hutter}, Anne and {Yepes}, Gustavo and {Gottl{\\\"o}ber}, Stefan and {Legrand}, Laurent and {Pentericci}, Laura and {Castellano}, Marco and {Choudhury}, Tirthankar Roy},\n title = \"{Astraeus - II. Quantifying the impact of cosmic variance during the Epoch of Reionization}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {stars: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, dark ages, reionization, first star, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = sep,\n volume = {506},\n number = {1},\n pages = {202-214},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stab1229},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2004.11096},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506..202U},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Steinhardt2021,\n author = {{Steinhardt}, Charles L. and {Jespersen}, Christian Kragh and {Linzer}, Nora B.},\n title = \"{Finding High-redshift Galaxies with JWST}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {734, 2007, 584, 902, 343, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = dec,\n volume = {923},\n number = {1},\n eid = {8},\n pages = {8},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac2a2f},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2111.14865},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...923....8S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Planck18,\n author = {{Planck Collaboration} and {Aghanim}, N. and {Akrami}, Y. and {Ashdown}, M. and {Aumont}, J. and {Baccigalupi}, C. and {Ballardini}, M. and {Banday}, A.~J. and {Barreiro}, R.~B. and {Bartolo}, N. and {Basak}, S. and {Battye}, R. and {Benabed}, K. and {Bernard}, J. -P. and {Bersanelli}, M. and {Bielewicz}, P. and {Bock}, J.~J. and {Bond}, J.~R. and {Borrill}, J. and {Bouchet}, F.~R. and {Boulanger}, F. and {Bucher}, M. and {Burigana}, C. and {Butler}, R.~C. and {Calabrese}, E. and {Cardoso}, J. -F. and {Carron}, J. and {Challinor}, A. and {Chiang}, H.~C. and {Chluba}, J. and {Colombo}, L.~P.~L. and {Combet}, C. and {Contreras}, D. and {Crill}, B.~P. and {Cuttaia}, F. and {de Bernardis}, P. and {de Zotti}, G. and {Delabrouille}, J. and {Delouis}, J. -M. and {Di Valentino}, E. and {Diego}, J.~M. and {Dor{\\'e}}, O. and {Douspis}, M. and {Ducout}, A. and {Dupac}, X. and {Dusini}, S. and {Efstathiou}, G. and {Elsner}, F. and {En{\\ss}lin}, T.~A. and {Eriksen}, H.~K. and {Fantaye}, Y. and {Farhang}, M. and {Fergusson}, J. and {Fernandez-Cobos}, R. and {Finelli}, F. and {Forastieri}, F. and {Frailis}, M. and {Fraisse}, A.~A. and {Franceschi}, E. and {Frolov}, A. and {Galeotta}, S. and {Galli}, S. and {Ganga}, K. and {G{\\'e}nova-Santos}, R.~T. and {Gerbino}, M. and {Ghosh}, T. and {Gonz{\\'a}lez-Nuevo}, J. and {G{\\'o}rski}, K.~M. and {Gratton}, S. and {Gruppuso}, A. and {Gudmundsson}, J.~E. and {Hamann}, J. and {Handley}, W. and {Hansen}, F.~K. and {Herranz}, D. and {Hildebrandt}, S.~R. and {Hivon}, E. and {Huang}, Z. and {Jaffe}, A.~H. and {Jones}, W.~C. and {Karakci}, A. and {Keih{\\\"a}nen}, E. and {Keskitalo}, R. and {Kiiveri}, K. and {Kim}, J. and {Kisner}, T.~S. and {Knox}, L. and {Krachmalnicoff}, N. and {Kunz}, M. and {Kurki-Suonio}, H. and {Lagache}, G. and {Lamarre}, J. -M. and {Lasenby}, A. and {Lattanzi}, M. and {Lawrence}, C.~R. and {Le Jeune}, M. and {Lemos}, P. and {Lesgourgues}, J. and {Levrier}, F. and {Lewis}, A. and {Liguori}, M. and {Lilje}, P.~B. and {Lilley}, M. and {Lindholm}, V. and {L{\\'o}pez-Caniego}, M. and {Lubin}, P.~M. and {Ma}, Y. -Z. and {Mac{\\'\\i}as-P{\\'e}rez}, J.~F. and {Maggio}, G. and {Maino}, D. and {Mandolesi}, N. and {Mangilli}, A. and {Marcos-Caballero}, A. and {Maris}, M. and {Martin}, P.~G. and {Martinelli}, M. and {Mart{\\'\\i}nez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, E. and {Matarrese}, S. and {Mauri}, N. and {McEwen}, J.~D. and {Meinhold}, P.~R. and {Melchiorri}, A. and {Mennella}, A. and {Migliaccio}, M. and {Millea}, M. and {Mitra}, S. and {Miville-Desch{\\^e}nes}, M. -A. and {Molinari}, D. and {Montier}, L. and {Morgante}, G. and {Moss}, A. and {Natoli}, P. and {N{\\o}rgaard-Nielsen}, H.~U. and {Pagano}, L. and {Paoletti}, D. and {Partridge}, B. and {Patanchon}, G. and {Peiris}, H.~V. and {Perrotta}, F. and {Pettorino}, V. and {Piacentini}, F. and {Polastri}, L. and {Polenta}, G. and {Puget}, J. -L. and {Rachen}, J.~P. and {Reinecke}, M. and {Remazeilles}, M. and {Renzi}, A. and {Rocha}, G. and {Rosset}, C. and {Roudier}, G. and {Rubi{\\~n}o-Mart{\\'\\i}n}, J.~A. and {Ruiz-Granados}, B. and {Salvati}, L. and {Sandri}, M. and {Savelainen}, M. and {Scott}, D. and {Shellard}, E.~P.~S. and {Sirignano}, C. and {Sirri}, G. and {Spencer}, L.~D. and {Sunyaev}, R. and {Suur-Uski}, A. -S. and {Tauber}, J.~A. and {Tavagnacco}, D. and {Tenti}, M. and {Toffolatti}, L. and {Tomasi}, M. and {Trombetti}, T. and {Valenziano}, L. and {Valiviita}, J. and {Van Tent}, B. and {Vibert}, L. and {Vielva}, P. and {Villa}, F. and {Vittorio}, N. and {Wandelt}, B.~D. and {Wehus}, I.~K. and {White}, M. and {White}, S.~D.~M. and {Zacchei}, A. and {Zonca}, A.},\n title = \"{Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {cosmic background radiation, cosmological parameters, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2020,\n month = sep,\n volume = {641},\n eid = {A6},\n pages = {A6},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201833910},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1807.06209},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...641A...6P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{OkeGunn1983_ABmag,\n author = {{Oke}, J.~B. and {Gunn}, J.~E.},\n title = \"{Secondary standard stars for absolute spectrophotometry.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Reference Stars, Spectral Energy Distribution, Stellar Spectrophotometry, Subdwarf Stars, Calibrating, Line Spectra, Astronomy},\n year = 1983,\n month = mar,\n volume = {266},\n pages = {713-717},\n doi = {10.1086/160817},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...266..713O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Klypin11_Bolplanck,\n author = {{Klypin}, Anatoly A. and {Trujillo-Gomez}, Sebastian and {Primack}, Joel},\n title = \"{Dark Matter Halos in the Standard Cosmological Model: Results from the Bolshoi Simulation}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of universe, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = oct,\n volume = {740},\n number = {2},\n eid = {102},\n pages = {102},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/102},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1002.3660},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...740..102K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Pozzetti10,\n author = {{Pozzetti}, L. and {Bolzonella}, M. and {Zucca}, E. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Lilly}, S. and {Renzini}, A. and {Moresco}, M. and {Mignoli}, M. and {Cassata}, P. and {Tasca}, L. and {Lamareille}, F. and {Maier}, C. and {Meneux}, B. and {Halliday}, C. and {Oesch}, P. and {Vergani}, D. and {Caputi}, K. and {Kova{\\v{c}}}, K. and {Cimatti}, A. and {Cucciati}, O. and {Iovino}, A. and {Peng}, Y. and {Carollo}, M. and {Contini}, T. and {Kneib}, J. -P. and {Le F{\\'e}vre}, O. and {Mainieri}, V. and {Scodeggio}, M. and {Bardelli}, S. and {Bongiorno}, A. and {Coppa}, G. and {de la Torre}, S. and {de Ravel}, L. and {Franzetti}, P. and {Garilli}, B. and {Kampczyk}, P. and {Knobel}, C. and {Le Borgne}, J. -F. and {Le Brun}, V. and {Pell{\\`o}}, R. and {Perez Montero}, E. and {Ricciardelli}, E. and {Silverman}, J.~D. and {Tanaka}, M. and {Tresse}, L. and {Abbas}, U. and {Bottini}, D. and {Cappi}, A. and {Guzzo}, L. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Leauthaud}, A. and {Maccagni}, D. and {Marinoni}, C. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Memeo}, P. and {Porciani}, C. and {Scaramella}, R. and {Scarlata}, C. and {Scoville}, N.},\n title = \"{zCOSMOS - 10k-bright spectroscopic sample. The bimodality in the galaxy stellar mass function: exploring its evolution with redshift}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies:, statistics, galaxies: formation, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2010,\n month = nov,\n volume = {523},\n eid = {A13},\n pages = {A13},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/200913020},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0907.5416},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...523A..13P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{emcee,\n author = {{Foreman-Mackey}, Daniel and {Hogg}, David W. and {Lang}, Dustin and {Goodman}, Jonathan},\n title = \"{emcee: The MCMC Hammer}\",\n journal = {\\pasp},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Physics - Computational Physics, Statistics - Computation},\n year = 2013,\n month = mar,\n volume = {125},\n number = {925},\n pages = {306},\n doi = {10.1086/670067},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1202.3665},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Sersic1963,\n author = {{S{\\'e}rsic}, J.~L.},\n title = \"{Influence of the atmospheric and instrumental dispersion on the brightness distribution in a galaxy}\",\n journal = {Boletin de la Asociacion Argentina de Astronomia La Plata Argentina},\n year = 1963,\n month = feb,\n volume = {6},\n pages = {41-43},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1963BAAA....6...41S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Duncan2019,\n author = {{Duncan}, Kenneth and {Conselice}, Christopher J. and {Mundy}, Carl and {Bell}, Eric and {Donley}, Jennifer and {Galametz}, Audrey and {Guo}, Yicheng and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Hathi}, Nimish and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan and {Kocevski}, Dale and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Mantha}, Kameswara B. and {Snyder}, Gregory F. and {Stefanon}, Mauro},\n title = \"{Observational Constraints on the Merger History of Galaxies since z {\\ensuremath{\\approx}} 6: Probabilistic Galaxy Pair Counts in the CANDELS Fields}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: interactions, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = may,\n volume = {876},\n number = {2},\n eid = {110},\n pages = {110},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab148a},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1903.12188},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876..110D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Duan2025,\n author = {{Duan}, Qiao and {Conselice}, Christopher J. and {Li}, Qiong and {Austin}, Duncan and {Harvey}, Thomas and {Adams}, Nathan J. and {Duncan}, Kenneth J. and {Trussler}, James and {Ferreira}, Leonardo and {Westcott}, Lewi and {Harris}, Honor and {Windhorst}, Rogier A. and {Holwerda}, Benne W. and {Broadhurst}, Thomas J. and {Coe}, Dan and {Cohen}, Seth H. and {Du}, Xiaojing and {Driver}, Simon P. and {Frye}, Brenda and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Hathi}, Nimish P. and {Jansen}, Rolf A. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Marshall}, Madeline A. and {Nonino}, Mario and {Ortiz}, Rafael and {Pirzkal}, Nor and {Robotham}, Aaron and {Ryan}, Russell E. and {Summers}, Jake and {D'Silva}, Jordan C.~J. and {Willmer}, Christopher N.~A. and {Yan}, Haojing},\n title = \"{Galaxy Mergers in the Epoch of Reionization I: A JWST Study of Pair Fractions, Merger Rates, and Stellar Mass Accretion Rates at z = 4.5 - 11.5}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = apr,\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staf638},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.tmp..606D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n%---------------------------------- Surveys / observations ----------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{Mellier2025,\n author = {{Euclid Collaboration: Mellier}, Y. and {Abdurro'uf} and {Acevedo Barroso}, J.~A. and {Ach{\\'u}carro}, A. and {Adamek}, J. and {Adam}, R. and {Addison}, G.~E. and {Aghanim}, N. and {Aguena}, M. and {Ajani}, V. and {Akrami}, Y. and {Al-Bahlawan}, A. and {Alavi}, A. and {Albuquerque}, I.~S. and {Alestas}, G. and {Alguero}, G. and {Allaoui}, A. and {Allen}, S.~W. and {Allevato}, V. and {Alonso-Tetilla}, A.~V. and {Altieri}, B. and {Alvarez-Candal}, A. and {Alvi}, S. and {Amara}, A. and {Amendola}, L. and {Amiaux}, J. and {Andika}, I.~T. and {Andreon}, S. and {Andrews}, A. and {Angora}, G. and {Angulo}, R.~E. and {Annibali}, F. and {Anselmi}, A. and {Anselmi}, S. and {Arcari}, S. and {Archidiacono}, M. and {Aric{\\`o}}, G. and {Arnaud}, M. and {Arnouts}, S. and {Asgari}, M. and {Asorey}, J. and {Atayde}, L. and {Atek}, H. and {Atrio-Barandela}, F. and {Aubert}, M. and {Aubourg}, E. and {Auphan}, T. and {Auricchio}, N. and {Aussel}, B. and {Aussel}, H. and {Avelino}, P.~P. and {Avgoustidis}, A. and {Avila}, S. and {Awan}, S. and {Azzollini}, R. and {Baccigalupi}, C. and {Bachelet}, E. and {Bacon}, D. and {Baes}, M. and {Bagley}, M.~B. and {Bahr-Kalus}, B. and {Balaguera-Antolinez}, A. and {Balbinot}, E. and {Balcells}, M. and {Baldi}, M. and {Baldry}, I. and {Balestra}, A. and {Ballardini}, M. and {Ballester}, O. and {Balogh}, M. and {Ba{\\~n}ados}, E. and {Barbier}, R. and {Bardelli}, S. and {Baron}, M. and {Barreiro}, T. and {Barrena}, R. and {Barriere}, J. -C. and {Barros}, B.~J. and {Barthelemy}, A. and {Bartolo}, N. and {Basset}, A. and {Battaglia}, P. and {Battisti}, A.~J. and {Baugh}, C.~M. and {Baumont}, L. and {Bazzanini}, L. and {Beaulieu}, J. -P. and {Beckmann}, V. and {Belikov}, A.~N. and {Bel}, J. and {Bellagamba}, F. and {Bella}, M. and {Bellini}, E. and {Benabed}, K. and {Bender}, R. and {Benevento}, G. and {Bennett}, C.~L. and {Benson}, K. and {Bergamini}, P. and {Bermejo-Climent}, J.~R. and {Bernardeau}, F. and {Bertacca}, D. and {Berthe}, M. and {Berthier}, J. and {Bethermin}, M. and {Beutler}, F. and {Bevillon}, C. and {Bhargava}, S. and {Bhatawdekar}, R. and {Bianchi}, D. and {Bisigello}, L. and {Biviano}, A. and {Blake}, R.~P. and {Blanchard}, A. and {Blazek}, J. and {Blot}, L. and {Bosco}, A. and {Bodendorf}, C. and {Boenke}, T. and {B{\\\"o}hringer}, H. and {Boldrini}, P. and {Bolzonella}, M. and {Bonchi}, A. and {Bonici}, M. and {Bonino}, D. and {Bonino}, L. and {Bonvin}, C. and {Bon}, W. and {Booth}, J.~T. and {Borgani}, S. and {Borlaff}, A.~S. and {Borsato}, E. and {Bose}, B. and {Botticella}, M.~T. and {Boucaud}, A. and {Bouche}, F. and {Boucher}, J.~S. and {Boutigny}, D. and {Bouvard}, T. and {Bouwens}, R. and {Bouy}, H. and {Bowler}, R.~A.~A. and {Bozza}, V. and {Bozzo}, E. and {Branchini}, E. and {Brando}, G. and {Brau-Nogue}, S. and {Brekke}, P. and {Bremer}, M.~N. and {Brescia}, M. and {Breton}, M. -A. and {Brinchmann}, J. and {Brinckmann}, T. and {Brockley-Blatt}, C. and {Brodwin}, M. and {Brouard}, L. and {Brown}, M.~L. and {Bruton}, S. and {Bucko}, J. and {Buddelmeijer}, H. and {Buenadicha}, G. and {Buitrago}, F. and {Burger}, P. and {Burigana}, C. and {Busillo}, V. and {Busonero}, D. and {Cabanac}, R. and {Cabayol-Garcia}, L. and {Cagliari}, M.~S. and {Caillat}, A. and {Caillat}, L. and {Calabrese}, M. and {Calabro}, A. and {Calderone}, G. and {Calura}, F. and {Camacho Quevedo}, B. and {Camera}, S. and {Campos}, L. and {Ca{\\~n}as-Herrera}, G. and {Candini}, G.~P. and {Cantiello}, M. and {Capobianco}, V. and {Cappellaro}, E. and {Cappelluti}, N. and {Cappi}, A. and {Caputi}, K.~I. and {Cara}, C. and {Carbone}, C. and {Cardone}, V.~F. and {Carella}, E. and {Carlberg}, R.~G. and {Carle}, M. and {Carminati}, L. and {Caro}, F. and {Carrasco}, J.~M. and {Carretero}, J. and {Carrilho}, P. and {Carron Duque}, J. and {Carry}, B.},\n title = \"{Euclid: I. Overview of the Euclid mission}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {instrumentation: detectors, instrumentation: spectrographs, space vehicles: instruments, telescopes, surveys, cosmology: observations, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics of Galaxies, Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = may,\n volume = {697},\n eid = {A1},\n pages = {A1},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202450810},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2405.13491},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...697A...1E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Jarvis2013,\n author = {{Jarvis}, Matt J. and {Bonfield}, D.~G. and {Bruce}, V.~A. and {Geach}, J.~E. and {McAlpine}, K. and {McLure}, R.~J. and {Gonz{\\'a}lez-Solares}, E. and {Irwin}, M. and {Lewis}, J. and {Yoldas}, A. Kupcu and {Andreon}, S. and {Cross}, N.~J.~G. and {Emerson}, J.~P. and {Dalton}, G. and {Dunlop}, J.~S. and {Hodgkin}, S.~T. and {Le}, F{\\`e}vre O. and {Karouzos}, M. and {Meisenheimer}, K. and {Oliver}, S. and {Rawlings}, S. and {Simpson}, C. and {Smail}, I. and {Smith}, D.~J.~B. and {Sullivan}, M. and {Sutherland}, W. and {White}, S.~V. and {Zwart}, J.~T.~L.},\n title = \"{The VISTA Deep Extragalactic Observations (VIDEO) survey}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {astronomical data bases: miscellaneous, surveys, large-scale structure of Universe, galaxies: general, galaxies: high redshift, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = jan,\n volume = {428},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1281-1295},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sts118},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1206.4263},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.428.1281J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Gwyn2012,\n author = {{Gwyn}, Stephen D.~J.},\n title = \"{The Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey: Stacked Images and Catalogs}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {astrometry, surveys, techniques: image processing, techniques: photometric, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = feb,\n volume = {143},\n number = {2},\n eid = {38},\n pages = {38},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-6256/143/2/38},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1101.1084},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....143...38G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lawrence2007,\n author = {{Lawrence}, A. and {Warren}, S.~J. and {Almaini}, O. and {Edge}, A.~C. and {Hambly}, N.~C. and {Jameson}, R.~F. and {Lucas}, P. and {Casali}, M. and {Adamson}, A. and {Dye}, S. and {Emerson}, J.~P. and {Foucaud}, S. and {Hewett}, P. and {Hirst}, P. and {Hodgkin}, S.~T. and {Irwin}, M.~J. and {Lodieu}, N. and {McMahon}, R.~G. and {Simpson}, C. and {Smail}, I. and {Mortlock}, D. and {Folger}, M.},\n title = \"{The UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS)}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {surveys, infrared: general, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = aug,\n volume = {379},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1599-1617},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0604426},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.379.1599L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Davis2007,\n author = {{Davis}, M. and {Guhathakurta}, P. and {Konidaris}, N.~P. and {Newman}, J.~A. and {Ashby}, M.~L.~N. and {Biggs}, A.~D. and {Barmby}, P. and {Bundy}, K. and {Chapman}, S.~C. and {Coil}, A.~L. and {Conselice}, C.~J. and {Cooper}, M.~C. and {Croton}, D.~J. and {Eisenhardt}, P.~R.~M. and {Ellis}, R.~S. and {Faber}, S.~M. and {Fang}, T. and {Fazio}, G.~G. and {Georgakakis}, A. and {Gerke}, B.~F. and {Goss}, W.~M. and {Gwyn}, S. and {Harker}, J. and {Hopkins}, A.~M. and {Huang}, J. -S. and {Ivison}, R.~J. and {Kassin}, S.~A. and {Kirby}, E.~N. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Koo}, D.~C. and {Laird}, E.~S. and {Le Floc'h}, E. and {Lin}, L. and {Lotz}, J.~M. and {Marshall}, P.~J. and {Martin}, D.~C. and {Metevier}, A.~J. and {Moustakas}, L.~A. and {Nandra}, K. and {Noeske}, K.~G. and {Papovich}, C. and {Phillips}, A.~C. and {Rich}, R.~M. and {Rieke}, G.~H. and {Rigopoulou}, D. and {Salim}, S. and {Schiminovich}, D. and {Simard}, L. and {Smail}, I. and {Small}, T.~A. and {Weiner}, B.~J. and {Willmer}, C.~N.~A. and {Willner}, S.~P. and {Wilson}, G. and {Wright}, E.~L. and {Yan}, R.},\n title = \"{The All-Wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey (AEGIS) Data Sets}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Photometry, Infrared: Galaxies, Radio Continuum: Galaxies, Surveys, Ultraviolet: Galaxies, X-Rays: Galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = may,\n volume = {660},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L1-L6},\n doi = {10.1086/517931},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0607355},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...660L...1D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Giavalisco2004,\n author = {{Giavalisco}, M. and {Ferguson}, H.~C. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Dickinson}, M. and {Alexander}, D.~M. and {Bauer}, F.~E. and {Bergeron}, J. and {Biagetti}, C. and {Brandt}, W.~N. and {Casertano}, S. and {Cesarsky}, C. and {Chatzichristou}, E. and {Conselice}, C. and {Cristiani}, S. and {Da Costa}, L. and {Dahlen}, T. and {de Mello}, D. and {Eisenhardt}, P. and {Erben}, T. and {Fall}, S.~M. and {Fassnacht}, C. and {Fosbury}, R. and {Fruchter}, A. and {Gardner}, J.~P. and {Grogin}, N. and {Hook}, R.~N. and {Hornschemeier}, A.~E. and {Idzi}, R. and {Jogee}, S. and {Kretchmer}, C. and {Laidler}, V. and {Lee}, K.~S. and {Livio}, M. and {Lucas}, R. and {Madau}, P. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Moustakas}, L.~A. and {Nonino}, M. and {Padovani}, P. and {Papovich}, C. and {Park}, Y. and {Ravindranath}, S. and {Renzini}, A. and {Richardson}, M. and {Riess}, A. and {Rosati}, P. and {Schirmer}, M. and {Schreier}, E. and {Somerville}, R.~S. and {Spinrad}, H. and {Stern}, D. and {Stiavelli}, M. and {Strolger}, L. and {Urry}, C.~M. and {Vandame}, B. and {Williams}, R. and {Wolf}, C.},\n title = \"{The Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey: Initial Results from Optical and Near-Infrared Imaging}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Galaxies: Distances and Redshifts, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Formation, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = jan,\n volume = {600},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L93-L98},\n doi = {10.1086/379232},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0309105},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...600L..93G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Colless2003,\n author = {{Colless}, Matthew and {Peterson}, Bruce A. and {Jackson}, Carole and {Peacock}, John A. and {Cole}, Shaun and {Norberg}, Peder and {Baldry}, Ivan K. and {Baugh}, Carlton M. and {Bland-Hawthorn}, Joss and {Bridges}, Terry and {Cannon}, Russell and {Collins}, Chris and {Couch}, Warrick and {Cross}, Nicholas and {Dalton}, Gavin and {De Propris}, Roberto and {Driver}, Simon P. and {Efstathiou}, George and {Ellis}, Richard S. and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Lahav}, Ofer and {Lewis}, Ian and {Lumsden}, Stuart and {Maddox}, Steve and {Madgwick}, Darren and {Sutherland}, Will and {Taylor}, Keith},\n title = \"{The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Final Data Release}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = jun,\n eid = {astro-ph/0306581},\n pages = {astro-ph/0306581},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0306581},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0306581},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003astro.ph..6581C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Huchra2012,\n author = {{Huchra}, John P. and {Macri}, Lucas M. and {Masters}, Karen L. and {Jarrett}, Thomas H. and {Berlind}, Perry and {Calkins}, Michael and {Crook}, Aidan C. and {Cutri}, Roc and {Erdo{\\v{g}}du}, Pirin and {Falco}, Emilio and {George}, Teddy and {Hutcheson}, Conrad M. and {Lahav}, Ofer and {Mader}, Jeff and {Mink}, Jessica D. and {Martimbeau}, Nathalie and {Schneider}, Stephen and {Skrutskie}, Michael and {Tokarz}, Susan and {Westover}, Michael},\n title = \"{The 2MASS Redshift Survey{\\textemdash}Description and Data Release}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {catalogs, galaxies: distances and redshifts, surveys, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = apr,\n volume = {199},\n number = {2},\n eid = {26},\n pages = {26},\n doi = {10.1088/0067-0049/199/2/26},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1108.0669},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJS..199...26H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{McPartland2025,\n author = {{Euclid Collaboration: McPartland}, C.~J.~R. and {Zalesky}, L. and {Weaver}, J.~R. and {Toft}, S. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Suzuki}, N. and {Szapudi}, I. and {Valdes}, I. and {Murphree}, G. and {Chartab}, N. and {Allen}, N. and {Taamoli}, S. and {Eisenhardt}, P.~R.~M. and {Arnouts}, S. and {Atek}, H. and {Brinchmann}, J. and {Castellano}, M. and {Chary}, R. and {Ch{\\'a}vez Ortiz}, O. and {Cuby}, J. -G. and {Finkelstein}, S.~L. and {Goto}, T. and {Gwyn}, S. and {Harikane}, Y. and {Inoue}, A.~K. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Mohr}, J.~J. and {Oesch}, P.~A. and {Ouchi}, M. and {Oguri}, M. and {Rhodes}, J. and {Rottgering}, H.~J.~A. and {Sawicki}, M. and {Scaramella}, R. and {Scarlata}, C. and {Silverman}, J.~D. and {Stern}, D. and {Teplitz}, H.~I. and {Shuntov}, M. and {Altieri}, B. and {Amara}, A. and {Andreon}, S. and {Auricchio}, N. and {Aussel}, H. and {Baccigalupi}, C. and {Baldi}, M. and {Bardelli}, S. and {Bender}, R. and {Bonino}, D. and {Branchini}, E. and {Brescia}, M. and {Camera}, S. and {Capobianco}, V. and {Carbone}, C. and {Carretero}, J. and {Casas}, S. and {Castander}, F.~J. and {Castignani}, G. and {Cavuoti}, S. and {Cimatti}, A. and {Colodro-Conde}, C. and {Congedo}, G. and {Conselice}, C.~J. and {Conversi}, L. and {Copin}, Y. and {Courbin}, F. and {Courtois}, H.~M. and {Da Silva}, A. and {Degaudenzi}, H. and {De Lucia}, G. and {Di Giorgio}, A.~M. and {Dinis}, J. and {Douspis}, M. and {Dubath}, F. and {Dupac}, X. and {Dusini}, S. and {Fabricius}, M. and {Farina}, M. and {Farrens}, S. and {Ferriol}, S. and {Fotopoulou}, S. and {Frailis}, M. and {Franceschi}, E. and {Fumana}, M. and {Galeotta}, S. and {Garilli}, B. and {George}, K. and {Gillis}, B. and {Giocoli}, C. and {Grazian}, A. and {Grupp}, F. and {Guzzo}, L. and {Hoekstra}, H. and {Holmes}, W. and {Hook}, I. and {Hormuth}, F. and {Hornstrup}, A. and {Hudelot}, P. and {Jahnke}, K. and {Keih{\\\"a}nen}, E. and {Kermiche}, S. and {Kiessling}, A. and {Kilbinger}, M. and {Kitching}, T. and {Kubik}, B. and {Kunz}, M. and {Kurki-Suonio}, H. and {Lilje}, P.~B. and {Lindholm}, V. and {Lloro}, I. and {Mainetti}, G. and {Maiorano}, E. and {Mansutti}, O. and {Marggraf}, O. and {Markovic}, K. and {Martinelli}, M. and {Martinet}, N. and {Marulli}, F. and {Massey}, R. and {Maurogordato}, S. and {Medinaceli}, E. and {Mei}, S. and {Melchior}, M. and {Mellier}, Y. and {Meneghetti}, M. and {Merlin}, E. and {Meylan}, G. and {Moresco}, M. and {Moscardini}, L. and {Munari}, E. and {Nakajima}, R. and {Neissner}, C. and {Niemi}, S. -M. and {Nightingale}, J.~W. and {Padilla}, C. and {Paltani}, S. and {Pasian}, F. and {Pedersen}, K. and {Percival}, W.~J. and {Pettorino}, V. and {Polenta}, G. and {Poncet}, M. and {Popa}, L.~A. and {Pozzetti}, L. and {Raison}, F. and {Rebolo}, R. and {Renzi}, A. and {Riccio}, G. and {Romelli}, E. and {Roncarelli}, M. and {Rossetti}, E. and {Saglia}, R. and {Sakr}, Z. and {S{\\'a}nchez}, A.~G. and {Sapone}, D. and {Sartoris}, B. and {Schirmer}, M. and {Schneider}, P. and {Schrabback}, T. and {Secroun}, A. and {Seidel}, G. and {Serrano}, S. and {Sirignano}, C. and {Sirri}, G. and {Stanco}, L. and {Steinwagner}, J. and {Surace}, C. and {Tallada-Crespi}, P. and {Tavagnacco}, D. and {Tereno}, I. and {Toledo-Moreo}, R. and {Torradeflot}, F. and {Tutusaus}, I. and {Valentijn}, E.~A. and {Valenziano}, L. and {Vassallo}, T. and {Veropalumbo}, A. and {Wang}, Y. and {Weller}, J. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Zoubian}, J. and {Zucca}, E. and {Biviano}, A. and {Bolzonella}, M. and {Boucaud}, A. and {Bozzo}, E. and {Burigana}, C. and {Di Ferdinando}, D. and {Farinelli}, R. and {Gracia-Carpio}, J. and {Mauri}, N. and {Scottez}, V. and {Tenti}, M. and {Viel}, M. and {Wiesmann}, M. and {Akrami}, Y. and {Allevato}, V. and {Anselmi}, S.},\n title = \"{Euclid preparation: LXIV. The Cosmic Dawn Survey (DAWN) of the Euclid Deep and Auxiliary Fields}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {catalogs, surveys, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = mar,\n volume = {695},\n eid = {A259},\n pages = {A259},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202451849},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2408.05275},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...695A.259E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Takada2014,\n author = {{Takada}, Masahiro and {Ellis}, Richard S. and {Chiba}, Masashi and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Aihara}, Hiroaki and {Arimoto}, Nobuo and {Bundy}, Kevin and {Cohen}, Judith and {Dor{\\'e}}, Olivier and {Graves}, Genevieve and {Gunn}, James E. and {Heckman}, Timothy and {Hirata}, Christopher M. and {Ho}, Paul and {Kneib}, Jean-Paul and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, Olivier and {Lin}, Lihwai and {More}, Surhud and {Murayama}, Hitoshi and {Nagao}, Tohru and {Ouchi}, Masami and {Seiffert}, Michael and {Silverman}, John D. and {Sodr{\\'e}}, Laerte and {Spergel}, David N. and {Strauss}, Michael A. and {Sugai}, Hajime and {Suto}, Yasushi and {Takami}, Hideki and {Wyse}, Rosemary},\n title = \"{Extragalactic science, cosmology, and Galactic archaeology with the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph}\",\n journal = {\\pasj},\n keywords = {cosmology: dark energy, cosmology: large-scale structure of Universe, galaxies: formation, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, instrumentation: spectographs, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = feb,\n volume = {66},\n number = {1},\n eid = {R1},\n pages = {R1},\n doi = {10.1093/pasj/pst019},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1206.0737},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PASJ...66R...1T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Greene2022,\n author = {{Greene}, Jenny and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Ouchi}, Masami and {Silverman}, John and {the PFS Galaxy Evolution Working Group}},\n title = \"{The Prime Focus Spectrograph Galaxy Evolution Survey}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = jun,\n eid = {arXiv:2206.14908},\n pages = {arXiv:2206.14908},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2206.14908},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2206.14908},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220614908G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Illingworth2013,\n author = {{Illingworth}, G.~D. and {Magee}, D. and {Oesch}, P.~A. and {Bouwens}, R.~J. and {Labb{\\'e}}, I. and {Stiavelli}, M. and {van Dokkum}, P.~G. and {Franx}, M. and {Trenti}, M. and {Carollo}, C.~M. and {Gonzalez}, V.},\n title = \"{The HST eXtreme Deep Field (XDF): Combining All ACS and WFC3/IR Data on the HUDF Region into the Deepest Field Ever}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, galaxies: abundances, galaxies: high-redshift, techniques: image processing, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = nov,\n volume = {209},\n number = {1},\n eid = {6},\n pages = {6},\n doi = {10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/6},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1305.1931},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..209....6I},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bouwens2023,\n author = {{Bouwens}, Rychard J. and {Stefanon}, Mauro and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Herard-Demanche}, Thomas and {Illingworth}, Garth D. and {Matthee}, Jorryt and {Naidu}, Rohan P. and {van Dokkum}, Pieter G. and {van Leeuwen}, Ivana F.},\n title = \"{Evolution of the UV LF from z 15 to z 8 using new JWST NIRCam medium-band observations over the HUDF/XDF}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, Cosmology: dark ages, reionization, first stars, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = jul,\n volume = {523},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1036-1055},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad1145},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2211.02607},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.1036B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Williams2025,\n author = {{Williams}, Christina C. and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Weibel}, Andrea and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Cloonan}, Aidan P. and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Barrufet}, Laia and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Bowler}, Rebecca A.~A. and {Dayal}, Pratika and {Franx}, Marijn and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Hutter}, Anne and {Ji}, Zhiyuan and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Manning}, Sinclaire M. and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {Xiao}, Mengyuan},\n title = \"{The PANORAMIC Survey: Pure Parallel Wide Area Legacy Imaging with JWST/NIRCam}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies, High-redshift galaxies, Redshift surveys, Extragalactic astronomy, Lyman-break galaxies, AGN host galaxies, Starburst galaxies, Quenched galaxies, 573, 734, 1378, 506, 979, 2017, 1570, 2016, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = feb,\n volume = {979},\n number = {2},\n eid = {140},\n pages = {140},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad97bc},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2410.01875},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...979..140W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Morishita2025,\n author = {{Morishita}, Takahiro and {Mason}, Charlotte A. and {Kreilgaard}, Kimi C. and {Trenti}, Michele and {Treu}, Tommaso and {Vulcani}, Benedetta and {Zhang}, Yechi and {Abdurro'uf} and {Alavi}, Anahita and {Atek}, Hakim and {Bah{\\'e}}, Yannick and {Brada{\\v{c}}}, Maru{\\v{s}}a and {Bradley}, Larry D. and {Bunker}, Andrew J. and {Coe}, Dan and {Colbert}, James and {Gelli}, Viola and {Hayes}, Matthew J. and {Jones}, Tucker and {Kodama}, Tadayuki and {Leethochawalit}, Nicha and {Liu}, Zhaoran and {Malkan}, Matthew A. and {Mehta}, Vihang and {Metha}, Benjamin and {Newman}, Andrew B. and {Rafelski}, Marc and {Roberts-Borsani}, Guido and {Rutkowski}, Michael J. and {Scarlata}, Claudia and {Stiavelli}, Massimo and {Sutanto}, Ryo A. and {Takahashi}, Kosuke and {Teplitz}, Harry I. and {Wang}, Xin},\n title = \"{BEACON: JWST NIRCam Pure-parallel Imaging Survey. I. Survey Design and Initial Results}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies, Reionization, High-redshift galaxies, 573, 1383, 734, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = apr,\n volume = {983},\n number = {2},\n eid = {152},\n pages = {152},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/adbbdc},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2412.04211},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...983..152M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Grogin2011,\n author = {{Grogin}, Norman A. and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Faber}, S.~M. and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Riess}, Adam G. and {Acquaviva}, Viviana and {Alexander}, David M. and {Almaini}, Omar and {Ashby}, Matthew L.~N. and {Barden}, Marco and {Bell}, Eric F. and {Bournaud}, Fr{\\'e}d{\\'e}ric and {Brown}, Thomas M. and {Caputi}, Karina I. and {Casertano}, Stefano and {Cassata}, Paolo and {Castellano}, Marco and {Challis}, Peter and {Chary}, Ranga-Ram and {Cheung}, Edmond and {Cirasuolo}, Michele and {Conselice}, Christopher J. and {Roshan Cooray}, Asantha and {Croton}, Darren J. and {Daddi}, Emanuele and {Dahlen}, Tomas and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel and {de Mello}, Du{\\'\\i}lia F. and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Dolch}, Timothy and {Donley}, Jennifer L. and {Dunlop}, James S. and {Dutton}, Aaron A. and {Elbaz}, David and {Fazio}, Giovanni G. and {Filippenko}, Alexei V. and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Gardner}, Jonathan P. and {Garnavich}, Peter M. and {Gawiser}, Eric and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Grazian}, Andrea and {Guo}, Yicheng and {Hathi}, Nimish P. and {H{\\\"a}ussler}, Boris and {Hopkins}, Philip F. and {Huang}, Jia-Sheng and {Huang}, Kuang-Han and {Jha}, Saurabh W. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Kirshner}, Robert P. and {Koo}, David C. and {Lai}, Kamson and {Lee}, Kyoung-Soo and {Li}, Weidong and {Lotz}, Jennifer M. and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {Madau}, Piero and {McCarthy}, Patrick J. and {McGrath}, Elizabeth J. and {McIntosh}, Daniel H. and {McLure}, Ross J. and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Moustakas}, Leonidas A. and {Mozena}, Mark and {Nandra}, Kirpal and {Newman}, Jeffrey A. and {Niemi}, Sami-Matias and {Noeske}, Kai G. and {Papovich}, Casey J. and {Pentericci}, Laura and {Pope}, Alexandra and {Primack}, Joel R. and {Rajan}, Abhijith and {Ravindranath}, Swara and {Reddy}, Naveen A. and {Renzini}, Alvio and {Rix}, Hans-Walter and {Robaina}, Aday R. and {Rodney}, Steven A. and {Rosario}, David J. and {Rosati}, Piero and {Salimbeni}, Sara and {Scarlata}, Claudia and {Siana}, Brian and {Simard}, Luc and {Smidt}, Joseph and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Spinrad}, Hyron and {Straughn}, Amber N. and {Strolger}, Louis-Gregory and {Telford}, Olivia and {Teplitz}, Harry I. and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {van der Wel}, Arjen and {Villforth}, Carolin and {Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Weiner}, Benjamin J. and {Wiklind}, Tommy and {Wild}, Vivienne and {Wilson}, Grant and {Wuyts}, Stijn and {Yan}, Hao-Jing and {Yun}, Min S.},\n title = \"{CANDELS: The Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = dec,\n volume = {197},\n number = {2},\n eid = {35},\n pages = {35},\n doi = {10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/35},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1105.3753},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..197...35G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Koekemoer2011,\n author = {{Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Faber}, S.~M. and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Koo}, David C. and {Lai}, Kamson and {Lotz}, Jennifer M. and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {McGrath}, Elizabeth J. and {Ogaz}, Sara and {Rajan}, Abhijith and {Riess}, Adam G. and {Rodney}, Steve A. and {Strolger}, Louis and {Casertano}, Stefano and {Castellano}, Marco and {Dahlen}, Tomas and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Dolch}, Timothy and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Grazian}, Andrea and {Guo}, Yicheng and {Hathi}, Nimish P. and {Huang}, Kuang-Han and {van der Wel}, Arjen and {Yan}, Hao-Jing and {Acquaviva}, Viviana and {Alexander}, David M. and {Almaini}, Omar and {Ashby}, Matthew L.~N. and {Barden}, Marco and {Bell}, Eric F. and {Bournaud}, Fr{\\'e}d{\\'e}ric and {Brown}, Thomas M. and {Caputi}, Karina I. and {Cassata}, Paolo and {Challis}, Peter J. and {Chary}, Ranga-Ram and {Cheung}, Edmond and {Cirasuolo}, Michele and {Conselice}, Christopher J. and {Roshan Cooray}, Asantha and {Croton}, Darren J. and {Daddi}, Emanuele and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel and {de Mello}, Duilia F. and {de Ravel}, Loic and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Donley}, Jennifer L. and {Dunlop}, James S. and {Dutton}, Aaron A. and {Elbaz}, David and {Fazio}, Giovanni G. and {Filippenko}, Alexei V. and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Frazer}, Chris and {Gardner}, Jonathan P. and {Garnavich}, Peter M. and {Gawiser}, Eric and {Gruetzbauch}, Ruth and {Hartley}, Will G. and {H{\\\"a}ussler}, Boris and {Herrington}, Jessica and {Hopkins}, Philip F. and {Huang}, Jia-Sheng and {Jha}, Saurabh W. and {Johnson}, Andrew and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Khostovan}, Ali A. and {Kirshner}, Robert P. and {Lani}, Caterina and {Lee}, Kyoung-Soo and {Li}, Weidong and {Madau}, Piero and {McCarthy}, Patrick J. and {McIntosh}, Daniel H. and {McLure}, Ross J. and {McPartland}, Conor and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Moreira}, Heidi and {Mortlock}, Alice and {Moustakas}, Leonidas A. and {Mozena}, Mark and {Nandra}, Kirpal and {Newman}, Jeffrey A. and {Nielsen}, Jennifer L. and {Niemi}, Sami and {Noeske}, Kai G. and {Papovich}, Casey J. and {Pentericci}, Laura and {Pope}, Alexandra and {Primack}, Joel R. and {Ravindranath}, Swara and {Reddy}, Naveen A. and {Renzini}, Alvio and {Rix}, Hans-Walter and {Robaina}, Aday R. and {Rosario}, David J. and {Rosati}, Piero and {Salimbeni}, Sara and {Scarlata}, Claudia and {Siana}, Brian and {Simard}, Luc and {Smidt}, Joseph and {Snyder}, Diana and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Spinrad}, Hyron and {Straughn}, Amber N. and {Telford}, Olivia and {Teplitz}, Harry I. and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {Vargas}, Carlos and {Villforth}, Carolin and {Wagner}, Cory R. and {Wandro}, Pat and {Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Weiner}, Benjamin J. and {Wiklind}, Tommy and {Wild}, Vivienne and {Wilson}, Grant and {Wuyts}, Stijn and {Yun}, Min S.},\n title = \"{CANDELS: The Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey{\\textemdash}The Hubble Space Telescope Observations, Imaging Data Products, and Mosaics}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = dec,\n volume = {197},\n number = {2},\n eid = {36},\n pages = {36},\n doi = {10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/36},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1105.3754},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..197...36K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Colless2001,\n author = {{Colless}, Matthew and {Dalton}, Gavin and {Maddox}, Steve and {Sutherland}, Will and {Norberg}, Peder and {Cole}, Shaun and {Bland-Hawthorn}, Joss and {Bridges}, Terry and {Cannon}, Russell and {Collins}, Chris and {Couch}, Warrick and {Cross}, Nicholas and {Deeley}, Kathryn and {De Propris}, Roberto and {Driver}, Simon P. and {Efstathiou}, George and {Ellis}, Richard S. and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Jackson}, Carole and {Lahav}, Ofer and {Lewis}, Ian and {Lumsden}, Stuart and {Madgwick}, Darren and {Peacock}, John A. and {Peterson}, Bruce A. and {Price}, Ian and {Seaborne}, Mark and {Taylor}, Keith},\n title = \"{The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: spectra and redshifts}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {SURVEYS, GALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERAL, GALAXIES: DISTANCES AND REDSHIFTS, COSMOLOGY: OBSERVATIONS, LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSE, Astrophysics},\n year = 2001,\n month = dec,\n volume = {328},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1039-1063},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04902.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0106498},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.328.1039C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n%---------------------------------- Conformity & Assembly bias ----------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{Wang2026,\n author = {{Wang}, Kai and {Schaye}, Joop and {Ben{\\'\\i}tez-Llambay}, Alejandro and {Chaikin}, Evgenii and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {Hu{\\v{s}}ko}, Filip and {McGibbon}, Robert J. and {Ploeckinger}, Sylvia and {Richings}, Alexander J. and {Schaller}, Matthieu and {Trayford}, James W.},\n title = \"{Gravitational potential drives the concentration dependence of the stellar mass─halo mass relation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical ─ galaxies: evolution ─ galaxies: formation ─ galaxies: groups: general ─ dark matter, Astrophysics of Galaxies, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2026,\n month = feb,\n volume = {546},\n number = {2},\n eid = {stag110},\n pages = {stag110},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stag110},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2511.20165},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026MNRAS.546ag110W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{GarciaMoreno2025,\n author = {{Garc{\\'\\i}a-Moreno}, S. and {Chaves-Montero}, J.},\n title = \"{The dependence of galaxy assembly bias on the selection criteria, number density, and redshift of galaxy samples}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: statistics, cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of Universe, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2026,\n month = feb,\n volume = {706},\n eid = {A377},\n pages = {A377},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202555093},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2504.06770},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026A&A...706A.377G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lim2025,\n author = {{Lim}, Seunghwan and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Maiolino}, Roberto and {Lovell}, Christopher C. and {Schaye}, Joop},\n title = \"{Think inside the box: cosmic variance and large-scale conformity of high-redshift massive galaxies in the FLAMINGO simulations}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = nov,\n eid = {arXiv:2511.09618},\n pages = {arXiv:2511.09618},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2511.09618},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2511.09618},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv251109618L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Binh2025,\n author = {{Binh}, Nguyen and {Long}, Arianna S. and {Antwi-Danso}, Jacqueline and {Andrews}, David C. and {Toni}, Greta and {Champagne}, Jaclyn B. and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Anderson}, Tiara and {Arango-Toro}, Rafael C. and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Cheng}, Yingjie and {Cooper}, Olivia R. and {Drakos}, Nicole E. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Gammon}, Elaine and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Liu}, Daizhong and {Magdis}, Georgios E. and {Maturi}, Matteo and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Moscardini}, Lauro and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Rich}, R. Michael and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Shamyati}, Samaneh and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Xu}, Can},\n title = \"{Sparse by the River: Diverse Environments of z > 3 Massive Quiescent Galaxies}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = dec,\n eid = {arXiv:2512.14881},\n pages = {arXiv:2512.14881},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2512.14881},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2512.14881},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv251214881B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hearin2016a,\n author = {{Hearin}, Andrew P. and {Behroozi}, Peter S. and {van den Bosch}, Frank C.},\n title = \"{On the physical origin of galactic conformity}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = sep,\n volume = {461},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2135-2145},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw1462},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1504.05578},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461.2135H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wang2013,\n author = {{Wang}, Lan and {Weinmann}, Simone M. and {De Lucia}, Gabriella and {Yang}, Xiaohu},\n title = \"{Detection of galaxy assembly bias}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = jul,\n volume = {433},\n number = {1},\n pages = {515-520},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt743},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1305.0350},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433..515W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sunayama2016,\n author = {{Sunayama}, Tomomi and {Hearin}, Andrew P. and {Padmanabhan}, Nikhil and {Leauthaud}, Alexie},\n title = \"{The scale-dependence of halo assembly bias}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = may,\n volume = {458},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1510-1516},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw332},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1509.06417},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.1510S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Artale2018,\n author = {{Artale}, M. Celeste and {Zehavi}, Idit and {Contreras}, Sergio and {Norberg}, Peder},\n title = \"{The impact of assembly bias on the halo occupation in hydrodynamical simulations}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: statistics, large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = nov,\n volume = {480},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3978-3992},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty2110},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1805.06938},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.3978A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wetzel2014,\n author = {{Wetzel}, Andrew R. and {Tinker}, Jeremy L. and {Conroy}, Charlie and {van den Bosch}, Frank C.},\n title = \"{Galaxy evolution near groups and clusters: ejected satellites and the spatial extent of environmental quenching}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical- galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: groups: general, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Galaxy Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = apr,\n volume = {439},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2687-2700},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu122},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1303.7231},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.439.2687W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kauffmann2015,\n author = {{Kauffmann}, Guinevere},\n title = \"{Physical origin of the large-scale conformity in the specific star formation rates of galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: formation, galaxies: stellar content, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = dec,\n volume = {454},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1840-1847},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv2113},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1508.02400},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.1840K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hartley2015,\n author = {{Hartley}, W.~G. and {Conselice}, C.~J. and {Mortlock}, A. and {Foucaud}, S. and {Simpson}, C.},\n title = \"{Galactic conformity and central/satellite quenching, from the satellite profiles of M* galaxies at 0.4 < z < 1.9 in the UKIDSS UDS}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, infrared: galaxies, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = aug,\n volume = {451},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1613-1636},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv972},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1406.6058},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.1613H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hearin&Watson2013,\n author = {{Hearin}, Andrew P. and {Watson}, Douglas F.},\n title = \"{The dark side of galaxy colour}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = oct,\n volume = {435},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1313-1324},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt1374},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1304.5557},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.435.1313H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Watson2015,\n author = {{Watson}, Douglas F. and {Hearin}, Andrew P. and {Berlind}, Andreas A. and {Becker}, Matthew R. and {Behroozi}, Peter S. and {Skibba}, Ramin A. and {Reyes}, Reinabelle and {Zentner}, Andrew R. and {van den Bosch}, Frank C.},\n title = \"{Predicting galaxy star formation rates via the co-evolution of galaxies and haloes}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: star formation, cosmology: theory, dark matter, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = jan,\n volume = {446},\n number = {1},\n pages = {651-662},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu2065},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1403.1578},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.446..651W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Oyarzun2024,\n author = {{Oyarz{\\'u}n}, Grecco A. and {Tinker}, Jeremy L. and {Bundy}, Kevin and {Xhakaj}, Enia and {Wyithe}, J. Stuart B.},\n title = \"{Galaxy Assembly Bias in the Stellar-to-halo Mass Relation for Red Central Galaxies from SDSS}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies, Extragalactic astronomy, Early-type galaxies, Large-scale structure of the universe, Observational cosmology, Dark matter, Galaxy dark matter halos, 573, 506, 429, 902, 1146, 353, 1880, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = oct,\n volume = {974},\n number = {1},\n eid = {29},\n pages = {29},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad6de1},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2409.03004},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...974...29O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Guo2017,\n author = {{Guo}, Yicheng and {Bell}, Eric F. and {Lu}, Yu and {Koo}, David C. and {Faber}, S.~M. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Kurczynski}, Peter and {Lee}, Seong-Kook and {Papovich}, Casey and {Chen}, Zhu and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Nayyeri}, Hooshang and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Pforr}, Janine and {Rodr{\\'\\i}guez-Puebla}, Aldo and {Santini}, Paola},\n title = \"{CANDELS Sheds Light on the Environmental Quenching of Low-mass Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {galaxies: dwarf, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = jun,\n volume = {841},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L22},\n pages = {L22},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/aa70e9},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1705.01946},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...841L..22G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kaviraj2025,\n author = {{Kaviraj}, S. and {Lazar}, I. and {Watkins}, A.~E. and {Laigle}, C. and {Martin}, G. and {Jackson}, R.~A.},\n title = \"{The quenching of star formation in dwarf galaxies: new perspectives from deep-wide surveys}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = mar,\n volume = {538},\n number = {1},\n pages = {153-164},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staf233},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2502.02656},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.538..153K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lacerna2018,\n author = {{Lacerna}, I. and {Contreras}, S. and {Gonz{\\'a}lez}, R.~E. and {Padilla}, N. and {Gonzalez-Perez}, V.},\n title = \"{Galactic conformity measured in semi-analytic models}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: general, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = mar,\n volume = {475},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1177-1189},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx3253},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1703.10175},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475.1177L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wang2023,\n author = {{Wang}, Kai and {Peng}, Yingjie and {Chen}, Yangyao},\n title = \"{Dissect two-halo galactic conformity effect for central galaxies: the dependence of star formation activities on the large-scale environment}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: groups: general, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = jul,\n volume = {523},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1268-1279},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad1169},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2304.06886},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.1268W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Palma2025,\n author = {{Palma}, Daniela and {Lacerna}, Ivan and {Artale}, M. Celeste and {Montero-Dorta}, Antonio D. and {Ruiz}, Andr{\\'e}s N. and {Cora}, Sof{\\'\\i}a A. and {Rodriguez}, Facundo and {Pallero}, Diego and {O'Mill}, Ana and {Choque-Challapa}, Nelvy},\n title = \"{The evolution of low-mass central galaxies in the vicinity of massive structures and its impact on the two-halo conformity}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: groups: general, galaxies: halos, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = dec,\n volume = {693},\n eid = {A67},\n pages = {A67},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202450976},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2406.12977},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...693A..67P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ayromlou2023,\n author = {{Ayromlou}, Mohammadreza and {Kauffmann}, Guinevere and {Anand}, Abhijeet and {White}, Simon D.~M.},\n title = \"{The physical origin of galactic conformity: from theory to observation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: evolution, large-scale structure of Universe, methods: analytical, methods: numerical, methods: observational, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = feb,\n volume = {519},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1913-1930},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac3637},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2207.02218},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.1913A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lacerna2022,\n author = {{Lacerna}, Ivan and {Rodriguez}, Facundo and {Montero-Dorta}, Antonio D. and {O'Mill}, Ana L. and {Cora}, Sof{\\'\\i}a A. and {Artale}, M. Celeste and {Ruiz}, Andr{\\'e}s N. and {Hough}, Tom{\\'a}s and {Vega-Mart{\\'\\i}nez}, Cristian A.},\n title = \"{On the environmental influence of groups and clusters of galaxies beyond the virial radius: Galactic conformity at few Mpc scales}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: general, galaxies: groups: general, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = jun,\n volume = {513},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2271-2284},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac1020},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2110.09536},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.2271L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sin2017,\n author = {{Sin}, Larry P.~T. and {Lilly}, Simon J. and {Henriques}, Bruno M.~B.},\n title = \"{On The Evidence For Large-Scale Galactic Conformity In The Local Universe}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2017,\n month = oct,\n volume = {471},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1192-1207},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx1674},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1702.08460},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471.1192S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ann2008,\n author = {{Ann}, H.~B. and {Park}, Changbom and {Choi}, Yun-Young},\n title = \"{Galactic satellite systems: radial distribution and environment dependence of galaxy morphology}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: observational, galaxies: formation, galaxies: general, galaxies: interactions, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = sep,\n volume = {389},\n number = {1},\n pages = {86-92},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13581.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0805.0637},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.389...86A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Borzyszkowski2017,\n author = {{Borzyszkowski}, Mikolaj and {Porciani}, Cristiano and {Romano-D{\\'\\i}az}, Emilio and {Garaldi}, Enrico},\n title = \"{ZOMG - I. How the cosmic web inhibits halo growth and generates assembly bias}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: haloes, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2017,\n month = jul,\n volume = {469},\n number = {1},\n pages = {594-611},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx873},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1610.04231},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469..594B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{GaneishaeiahVeena2018,\n author = {{Ganeshaiah Veena}, Punyakoti and {Cautun}, Marius and {van de Weygaert}, Rien and {Tempel}, Elmo and {Jones}, Bernard J.~T. and {Rieder}, Steven and {Frenk}, Carlos S.},\n title = \"{The Cosmic Ballet: spin and shape alignments of haloes in the cosmic web}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: haloes, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = nov,\n volume = {481},\n number = {1},\n pages = {414-438},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty2270},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1805.00033},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481..414G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Paranjape2018,\n author = {{Paranjape}, Aseem and {Hahn}, Oliver and {Sheth}, Ravi K.},\n title = \"{Halo assembly bias and the tidal anisotropy of the local halo environment}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = may,\n volume = {476},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3631-3647},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty496},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1706.09906},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.3631P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Gao2005,\n author = {{Gao}, Liang and {Springel}, Volker and {White}, Simon D.~M.},\n title = \"{The age dependence of halo clustering}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: N-body simulations, methods: numerical, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: haloes, dark matter, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = oct,\n volume = {363},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L66-L70},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00084.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0506510},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.363L..66G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Gao2008,\n author = {{Gao}, Liang and {Navarro}, Julio F. and {Cole}, Shaun and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {White}, Simon D.~M. and {Springel}, Volker and {Jenkins}, Adrian and {Neto}, Angelo F.},\n title = \"{The redshift dependence of the structure of massive {\\ensuremath{\\Lambda}} cold dark matter haloes}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: N-body simulations, methods: numerical, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: structure, dark matter, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = jun,\n volume = {387},\n number = {2},\n pages = {536-544},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13277.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0711.0746},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.387..536G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sun2018,\n author = {{Sun}, Shuangpeng and {Guo}, Qi and {Wang}, Lan and {Lacey}, Cedric G. and {Wang}, Jie and {Gao}, Liang and {Pan}, Jun},\n title = \"{The large-scale effect of environment on galactic conformity}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: statistics, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = jul,\n volume = {477},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3136-3144},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty832},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1801.01617},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.3136S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Zu&Mandelbaum2018,\n author = {{Zu}, Ying and {Mandelbaum}, Rachel},\n title = \"{Mapping stellar content to dark matter haloes - III. Environmental dependence and conformity of galaxy colours}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: statistics, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = may,\n volume = {476},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1637-1653},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty279},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1703.09219},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.1637Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wang&White2012,\n author = {{Wang}, Wenting and {White}, Simon D.~M.},\n title = \"{Satellite abundances around bright isolated galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies: statistics, cosmology: observations, dark matter, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = aug,\n volume = {424},\n number = {4},\n pages = {2574-2598},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21256.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1203.0009},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.424.2574W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Calderon2018,\n author = {{Calderon}, Victor F. and {Berlind}, Andreas A. and {Sinha}, Manodeep},\n title = \"{Small- and large-scale galactic conformity in SDSS DR7}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, cosmology: large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: observations, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: groups: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = oct,\n volume = {480},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2031-2045},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty2000},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1712.02797},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.2031C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Campbell2015,\n author = {{Campbell}, Duncan and {van den Bosch}, Frank C. and {Hearin}, Andrew and {Padmanabhan}, Nikhil and {Berlind}, Andreas and {Mo}, H.~J. and {Tinker}, Jeremy and {Yang}, Xiaohu},\n title = \"{Assessing colour-dependent occupation statistics inferred from galaxy group catalogues}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = sep,\n volume = {452},\n number = {1},\n pages = {444-469},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv1091},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1505.04798},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452..444C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hearin2015,\n author = {{Hearin}, Andrew P. and {Watson}, Douglas F. and {van den Bosch}, Frank C.},\n title = \"{Beyond halo mass: galactic conformity as a smoking gun of central galaxy assembly bias}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = sep,\n volume = {452},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1958-1969},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv1358},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1404.6524},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452.1958H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kauffmann2013,\n author = {{Kauffmann}, Guinevere and {Li}, Cheng and {Zhang}, Wei and {Weinmann}, Simone},\n title = \"{A re-examination of galactic conformity and a comparison with semi-analytic models of galaxy formation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = apr,\n volume = {430},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1447-1456},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt007},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1209.3306},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430.1447K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kawinwanichakij2016,\n author = {{Kawinwanichakij}, Lalitwadee and {Quadri}, Ryan F. and {Papovich}, Casey and {Kacprzak}, Glenn G. and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Spitler}, Lee R. and {Straatman}, Caroline M.~S. and {Tran}, Kim-Vy H. and {Allen}, Rebecca and {Behroozi}, Peter and {Cowley}, Michael and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Hartley}, W.~G. and {Kelson}, Daniel D. and {Koo}, David C. and {Lee}, Seong-Kook and {Lu}, Yu and {Nanayakkara}, Themiya and {Persson}, S. Eric and {Primack}, Joel and {Tilvi}, Vithal and {Tomczak}, Adam R. and {van Dokkum}, Pieter},\n title = \"{Satellite Quenching and Galactic Conformity at 0.3 < z < 2.5}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: halos, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = jan,\n volume = {817},\n number = {1},\n eid = {9},\n pages = {9},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/9},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1511.02862},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...817....9K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Berti2017,\n author = {{Berti}, Angela M. and {Coil}, Alison L. and {Behroozi}, Peter S. and {Eisenstein}, Daniel J. and {Bray}, Aaron D. and {Cool}, Richard J. and {Moustakas}, John},\n title = \"{PRIMUS: One- and Two-halo Galactic Conformity at 0.2 < z < 1}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = jan,\n volume = {834},\n number = {1},\n eid = {87},\n pages = {87},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/87},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1608.05084},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...834...87B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Weinmann2006,\n author = {{Weinmann}, Simone M. and {van den Bosch}, Frank C. and {Yang}, Xiaohu and {Mo}, H.~J.},\n title = \"{Properties of galaxy groups in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey - I. The dependence of colour, star formation and morphology on halo mass}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: general, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = feb,\n volume = {366},\n number = {1},\n pages = {2-28},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09865.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0509147},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.366....2W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wetzel2013,\n author = {{Wetzel}, Andrew R. and {Tinker}, Jeremy L. and {Conroy}, Charlie and {van den Bosch}, Frank C.},\n title = \"{Galaxy evolution in groups and clusters: satellite star formation histories and quenching time-scales in a hierarchical Universe}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: groups: general, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2013,\n month = jun,\n volume = {432},\n number = {1},\n pages = {336-358},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt469},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1206.3571},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432..336W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{vandenBosch2008,\n author = {{van den Bosch}, Frank C. and {Aquino}, Daniel and {Yang}, Xiaohu and {Mo}, H.~J. and {Pasquali}, Anna and {McIntosh}, Daniel H. and {Weinmann}, Simone M. and {Kang}, Xi},\n title = \"{The importance of satellite quenching for the build-up of the red sequence of present-day galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: general, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = jun,\n volume = {387},\n number = {1},\n pages = {79-91},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13230.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0710.3164},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.387...79V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Prescott2011,\n author = {{Prescott}, Matthew and {Baldry}, I.~K. and {James}, P.~A. and {Bamford}, S.~P. and {Bland-Hawthorn}, J. and {Brough}, S. and {Brown}, M.~J.~I. and {Cameron}, E. and {Conselice}, C.~J. and {Croom}, S.~M. and {Driver}, S.~P. and {Frenk}, C.~S. and {Gunawardhana}, M. and {Hill}, D.~T. and {Hopkins}, A.~M. and {Jones}, D.~H. and {Kelvin}, L.~S. and {Kuijken}, K. and {Liske}, J. and {Loveday}, J. and {Nichol}, R.~C. and {Norberg}, P. and {Parkinson}, H.~R. and {Peacock}, J.~A. and {Phillipps}, S. and {Pimbblet}, K.~A. and {Popescu}, C.~C. and {Robotham}, A.~S.~G. and {Sharp}, R.~G. and {Sutherland}, W.~J. and {Taylor}, E.~N. and {Tuffs}, R.~J. and {van Kampen}, E. and {Wijesinghe}, D.},\n title = \"{Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): the red fraction and radial distribution of satellite galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {surveys, galaxies: dwarf, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = oct,\n volume = {417},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1374-1386},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19353.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1107.0141},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.417.1374P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Xu2018,\n author = {{Xu}, Haojie and {Zheng}, Zheng and {Guo}, Hong and {Zu}, Ying and {Zehavi}, Idit and {Weinberg}, David H.},\n title = \"{The conditional colour-magnitude distribution - I. A comprehensive model of the colour-magnitude-halo mass distribution of present-day galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: distances and redshifts, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: statistics, large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: observations, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = dec,\n volume = {481},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5470-5500},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty2615},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1801.07272},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.5470X},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Skibba&Seth2009,\n author = {{Skibba}, Ramin A. and {Sheth}, Ravi K.},\n title = \"{A halo model of galaxy colours and clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: analytical, methods: statistical, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, large-scale structure of the universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = jan,\n volume = {392},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1080-1091},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14007.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0805.0310},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.392.1080S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Pahwa2017,\n author = {{Pahwa}, Isha and {Paranjape}, Aseem},\n title = \"{Analytical halo model of galactic conformity}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2017,\n month = sep,\n volume = {470},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1298-1313},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx1325},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1612.00464},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.1298P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Paranjape2015,\n author = {{Paranjape}, Aseem and {Kova{\\v{c}}}, Katarina and {Hartley}, William G. and {Pahwa}, Isha},\n title = \"{Correlating galaxy colour and halo concentration: a tunable halo model of galactic conformity}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = dec,\n volume = {454},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3030-3048},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv2137},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1503.08212},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.3030P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hearin2017,\n author = {{Hearin}, Andrew P. and {Campbell}, Duncan and {Tollerud}, Erik and {Behroozi}, Peter and {Diemer}, Benedikt and {Goldbaum}, Nathan J. and {Jennings}, Elise and {Leauthaud}, Alexie and {Mao}, Yao-Yuan and {More}, Surhud and {Parejko}, John and {Sinha}, Manodeep and {Sip{\\\"o}cz}, Brigitta and {Zentner}, Andrew},\n title = \"{Forward Modeling of Large-scale Structure: An Open-source Approach with Halotools}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {cosmology: theory, galaxies: halos, galaxies: statistics, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = nov,\n volume = {154},\n number = {5},\n eid = {190},\n pages = {190},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-3881/aa859f},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1606.04106},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154..190H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hearin2016b,\n author = {{Hearin}, Andrew P. and {Zentner}, Andrew R. and {van den Bosch}, Frank C. and {Campbell}, Duncan and {Tollerud}, Erik},\n title = \"{Introducing decorated HODs: modelling assembly bias in the galaxy-halo connection}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, dark matter, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = aug,\n volume = {460},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2552-2570},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw840},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1512.03050},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460.2552H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hearin2013,\n author = {{Hearin}, Andrew P. and {Zentner}, Andrew R. and {Berlind}, Andreas A. and {Newman}, Jeffrey A.},\n title = \"{SHAM beyond clustering: new tests of galaxy-halo abundance matching with galaxy groups}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: structure, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = jul,\n volume = {433},\n number = {1},\n pages = {659-680},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt755},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1210.4927},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433..659H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lacerna2014,\n author = {{Lacerna}, Ivan and {Padilla}, Nelson and {Stasyszyn}, Federico},\n title = \"{The nature of assembly bias - III. Observational properties}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: statistics, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = oct,\n volume = {443},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3107-3117},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu1318},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1110.6174},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.443.3107L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lin2016,\n author = {{Lin}, Yen-Ting and {Mandelbaum}, Rachel and {Huang}, Yun-Hsin and {Huang}, Hung-Jin and {Dalal}, Neal and {Diemer}, Benedikt and {Jian}, Hung-Yu and {Kravtsov}, Andrey},\n title = \"{On Detecting Halo Assembly Bias with Galaxy Populations}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: halos, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = mar,\n volume = {819},\n number = {2},\n eid = {119},\n pages = {119},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/119},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1504.07632},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...819..119L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kravtsov2018,\n author = {{Kravtsov}, A.~V. and {Vikhlinin}, A.~A. and {Meshcheryakov}, A.~V.},\n title = \"{Stellar Mass{\\textemdash}Halo Mass Relation and Star Formation Efficiency in High-Mass Halos}\",\n journal = {Astronomy Letters},\n keywords = {galaxy clusters, dark matter, stellar mass, star formation, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = jan,\n volume = {44},\n number = {1},\n pages = {8-34},\n doi = {10.1134/S1063773717120015},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1401.7329},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AstL...44....8K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tinker2018a,\n author = {{Tinker}, Jeremy L. and {Hahn}, ChangHoon and {Mao}, Yao-Yuan and {Wetzel}, Andrew R. and {Conroy}, Charlie},\n title = \"{Halo histories versus galaxy properties at z = 0 II: large-scale galactic conformity}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = jun,\n volume = {477},\n number = {1},\n pages = {935-945},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty666},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1702.01121},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477..935T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Matthee2017,\n author = {{Matthee}, Jorryt and {Schaye}, Joop and {Crain}, Robert A. and {Schaller}, Matthieu and {Bower}, Richard and {Theuns}, Tom},\n title = \"{The origin of scatter in the stellar mass-halo mass relation of central galaxies in the EAGLE simulation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2017,\n month = feb,\n volume = {465},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2381-2396},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw2884},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1608.08218},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.2381M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tojeiro2017,\n author = {{Tojeiro}, Rita and {Eardley}, Elizabeth and {Peacock}, John A. and {Norberg}, Peder and {Alpaslan}, Mehmet and {Driver}, Simon P. and {Henriques}, Bruno and {Hopkins}, Andrew M. and {Kafle}, Prajwal R. and {Robotham}, Aaron S.~G. and {Thomas}, Peter and {Tonini}, Chiara and {Wild}, Vivienne},\n title = \"{Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): halo formation times and halo assembly bias on the cosmic web}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: haloes, cosmology: observations, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = sep,\n volume = {470},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3720-3741},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx1466},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1612.08595},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.3720T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Croton2007,\n author = {{Croton}, Darren J. and {Gao}, Liang and {White}, Simon D.~M.},\n title = \"{Halo assembly bias and its effects on galaxy clustering}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: statistics, cosmology: theory., large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = feb,\n volume = {374},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1303-1309},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11230.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0605636},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.374.1303C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lehmann2017,\n author = {{Lehmann}, Benjamin V. and {Mao}, Yao-Yuan and {Becker}, Matthew R. and {Skillman}, Samuel W. and {Wechsler}, Risa H.},\n title = \"{The Concentration Dependence of the Galaxy-Halo Connection: Modeling Assembly Bias with Abundance Matching}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark matter, galaxies: halos, methods: analytical, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = jan,\n volume = {834},\n number = {1},\n eid = {37},\n pages = {37},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/37},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1510.05651},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...834...37L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Zentner2019,\n author = {{Zentner}, Andrew R. and {Hearin}, Andrew and {van den Bosch}, Frank C. and {Lange}, Johannes U. and {Villarreal}, Antonia Sierra},\n title = \"{Constraints on assembly bias from galaxy clustering}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: statistics, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = may,\n volume = {485},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1196-1209},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz470},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1606.07817},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.1196Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Gao&White2007,\n author = {{Gao}, Liang and {White}, Simon D.~M.},\n title = \"{Assembly bias in the clustering of dark matter haloes}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: N-body simulations, methods: numerical, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: clustering, dark matter, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = apr,\n volume = {377},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L5-L9},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1745-3933.2007.00292.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0611921},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.377L...5G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wechsler2006,\n author = {{Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Zentner}, Andrew R. and {Bullock}, James S. and {Kravtsov}, Andrey V. and {Allgood}, Brandon},\n title = \"{The Dependence of Halo Clustering on Halo Formation History, Concentration, and Occupation}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Cosmology: Dark Matter, Galaxies: Formation, Galaxies: Halos, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Methods: Numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = nov,\n volume = {652},\n number = {1},\n pages = {71-84},\n doi = {10.1086/507120},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0512416},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...652...71W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lyu2023,\n author = {{Lyu}, Cheqiu and {Peng}, Yingjie and {Jing}, Yipeng and {Yang}, Xiaohu and {Ho}, Luis C. and {Renzini}, Alvio and {Wang}, Bitao and {Wang}, Kai and {Xu}, Bingxiao and {Zhao}, Dingyi and {Dou}, Jing and {Gu}, Qiusheng and {Maiolino}, Roberto and {Mannucci}, Filippo and {Yuan}, Feng},\n title = \"{From Halos to Galaxies. VII. The Connections between Stellar Mass Growth History, Quenching History, and Halo Assembly History for Central Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy dark matter halos, Star formation, 594, 1880, 1569, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = dec,\n volume = {959},\n number = {1},\n eid = {5},\n pages = {5},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad036b},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2310.10733},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...959....5L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dalal2008,\n author = {{Dalal}, Neal and {Dor{\\'e}}, Olivier and {Huterer}, Dragan and {Shirokov}, Alexander},\n title = \"{Imprints of primordial non-Gaussianities on large-scale structure: Scale-dependent bias and abundance of virialized objects}\",\n journal = {\\prd},\n keywords = {98.65.Dx, 95.35.+d, 98.80.Cq, Superclusters, large-scale structure of the Universe, Dark matter, Particle-theory and field-theory models of the early Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = jun,\n volume = {77},\n number = {12},\n eid = {123514},\n pages = {123514},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevD.77.123514},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0710.4560},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008PhRvD..77l3514D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Zentner2014,\n author = {{Zentner}, Andrew R. and {Hearin}, Andrew P. and {van den Bosch}, Frank C.},\n title = \"{Galaxy assembly bias: a significant source of systematic error in the galaxy-halo relationship}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = oct,\n volume = {443},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3044-3067},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu1383},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1311.1818},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.443.3044Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hahn2009,\n author = {{Hahn}, Oliver and {Porciani}, Cristiano and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Carollo}, C. Marcella},\n title = \"{Tidal effects and the environment dependence of halo assembly}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: N-body simulations, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = oct,\n volume = {398},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1742-1756},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15271.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0803.4211},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.398.1742H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bett2007,\n author = {{Bett}, Philip and {Eke}, Vincent and {Frenk}, Carlos S. and {Jenkins}, Adrian and {Helly}, John and {Navarro}, Julio},\n title = \"{The spin and shape of dark matter haloes in the Millennium simulation of a {\\ensuremath{\\Lambda}} cold dark matter universe}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: N-body simulations, galaxies: haloes, dark matter, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = mar,\n volume = {376},\n number = {1},\n pages = {215-232},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11432.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0608607},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.376..215B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Li2008,\n author = {{Li}, Yun and {Mo}, H.~J. and {Gao}, L.},\n title = \"{On halo formation times and assembly bias}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, cosmology: theory, dark matter, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = sep,\n volume = {389},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1419-1426},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13667.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0803.2250},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.389.1419L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Salcedo2018,\n author = {{Salcedo}, Andr{\\'e}s N. and {Maller}, Ariyeh H. and {Berlind}, Andreas A. and {Sinha}, Manodeep and {McBride}, Cameron K. and {Behroozi}, Peter S. and {Wechsler}, Risa H. and {Weinberg}, David H.},\n title = \"{Spatial clustering of dark matter haloes: secondary bias, neighbour bias, and the influence of massive neighbours on halo properties}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = apr,\n volume = {475},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4411-4423},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty109},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1708.08451},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475.4411S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Mao2018,\n author = {{Mao}, Yao-Yuan and {Zentner}, Andrew R. and {Wechsler}, Risa H.},\n title = \"{Beyond assembly bias: exploring secondary halo biases for cluster-size haloes}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = mar,\n volume = {474},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5143-5157},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx3111},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1705.03888},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.5143M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Treyer2018,\n author = {{Treyer}, M. and {Kraljic}, K. and {Arnouts}, S. and {de la Torre}, S. and {Pichon}, C. and {Dubois}, Y. and {Vibert}, D. and {Milliard}, B. and {Laigle}, C. and {Seibert}, M. and {Brown}, M.~J.~I. and {Grootes}, M.~W. and {Wright}, A.~H. and {Liske}, J. and {Lara-Lopez}, M.~A. and {Bland-Hawthorn}, J.},\n title = \"{Group quenching and galactic conformity at low redshift}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {surveys, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: groups: general, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = jun,\n volume = {477},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2684-2704},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty769},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1712.05318},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.2684T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Knobel2015,\n author = {{Knobel}, Christian and {Lilly}, Simon J. and {Woo}, Joanna and {Kova{\\v{c}}}, Katarina},\n title = \"{Quenching of Star Formation in Sloan Digital Sky Survey Groups: Centrals, Satellites, and Galactic Conformity}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: groups: general, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = feb,\n volume = {800},\n number = {1},\n eid = {24},\n pages = {24},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/24},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1408.2553},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...800...24K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n%---------------------------------- Clustering quiescent vs star-forming ----------------------------------\n@BOOK{Stoyan&Stoyan1994,\n author = {{Stoyan}, D. and {Stoyan}, H.},\n title = \"{Fractals, Random Shapes and Point Fields. Methods of Geometrical Statistics}\",\n year = 1994,\n publisher = {New York: Wiley}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Beisbart&Kerscher2000,\n author = {{Beisbart}, Claus and {Kerscher}, Martin},\n title = \"{Luminosity- and Morphology-dependent Clustering of Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Clusters: General, Galaxies: Fundamental Parameters, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Methods: Statistical, Astrophysics},\n year = 2000,\n month = dec,\n volume = {545},\n number = {1},\n pages = {6-25},\n doi = {10.1086/317788},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0003358},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...545....6B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Gunawardhana2018,\n author = {{Gunawardhana}, M.~L.~P. and {Norberg}, P. and {Zehavi}, I. and {Farrow}, D.~J. and {Loveday}, J. and {Hopkins}, A.~M. and {Davies}, L.~J.~M. and {Wang}, L. and {Alpaslan}, M. and {Bland-Hawthorn}, J. and {Brough}, S. and {Holwerda}, B.~W. and {Owers}, M.~S. and {Wright}, A.~H.},\n title = \"{Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): the signatures of galaxy interactions as viewed from small-scale galaxy clustering}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: distances and redshifts, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: starburst, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = sep,\n volume = {479},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1433-1464},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty1638},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1806.08255},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.1433G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Skibba2013,\n author = {{Skibba}, Ramin A. and {Sheth}, Ravi K. and {Croton}, Darren J. and {Muldrew}, Stuart I. and {Abbas}, Ummi and {Pearce}, Frazer R. and {Shattow}, Genevieve M.},\n title = \"{Measures of galaxy environment - II. Rank-ordered mark correlations}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = feb,\n volume = {429},\n number = {1},\n pages = {458-468},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sts349},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1211.0287},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429..458S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sheth&Tormen2004,\n author = {{Sheth}, Ravi K. and {Tormen}, Giuseppe},\n title = \"{On the environmental dependence of halo formation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: clusters: general, cosmology: theory, dark matter, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = jun,\n volume = {350},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1385-1390},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07733.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0402237},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.350.1385S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sureshkumar2021,\n author = {{Sureshkumar}, U. and {Durkalec}, A. and {Pollo}, A. and {Bilicki}, M. and {Loveday}, J. and {Farrow}, D.~J. and {Holwerda}, B.~W. and {Hopkins}, A.~M. and {Liske}, J. and {Pimbblet}, K.~A. and {Taylor}, E.~N. and {Wright}, A.~H.},\n title = \"{Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA). Tracing galaxy environment using the marked correlation function}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {large-scale structure of Universe, galaxies: statistics, galaxies: formation, galaxies: evolution, cosmology: observations, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = sep,\n volume = {653},\n eid = {A35},\n pages = {A35},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202140500},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2102.04177},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653A..35S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Carnall2018,\n author = {{Carnall}, A.~C. and {McLure}, R.~J. and {Dunlop}, J.~S. and {Dav{\\'e}}, R.},\n title = \"{Inferring the star formation histories of massive quiescent galaxies with BAGPIPES: evidence for multiple quenching mechanisms}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = nov,\n volume = {480},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4379-4401},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty2169},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1712.04452},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.4379C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Zehavi2005,\n author = {{Zehavi}, Idit and {Zheng}, Zheng and {Weinberg}, David H. and {Frieman}, Joshua A. and {Berlind}, Andreas A. and {Blanton}, Michael R. and {Scoccimarro}, Roman and {Sheth}, Ravi K. and {Strauss}, Michael A. and {Kayo}, Issha and {Suto}, Yasushi and {Fukugita}, Masataka and {Nakamura}, Osamu and {Bahcall}, Neta A. and {Brinkmann}, Jon and {Gunn}, James E. and {Hennessy}, Greg S. and {Ivezi{\\'c}}, {\\v{Z}}eljko and {Knapp}, Gillian R. and {Loveday}, Jon and {Meiksin}, Avery and {Schlegel}, David J. and {Schneider}, Donald P. and {Szapudi}, Istvan and {Tegmark}, Max and {Vogeley}, Michael S. and {York}, Donald G. and {SDSS Collaboration}},\n title = \"{The Luminosity and Color Dependence of the Galaxy Correlation Function}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Distances and Redshifts, Galaxies: Halos, Galaxies: Statistics, Cosmology: Large-Scale Structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = sep,\n volume = {630},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1-27},\n doi = {10.1086/431891},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0408569},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...630....1Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wang2022,\n author = {{Wang}, Kuan and {Mao}, Yao-Yuan and {Zentner}, Andrew R. and {Guo}, Hong and {Lange}, Johannes U. and {van den Bosch}, Frank C. and {Mezini}, Lorena},\n title = \"{Evidence of galaxy assembly bias in SDSS DR7 galaxy samples from count statistics}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: statistics, cosmology: observations, cosmology: large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2022,\n month = nov,\n volume = {516},\n number = {3},\n pages = {4003-4024},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac2465},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2204.05332},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.4003W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Berti2019,\n author = {{Berti}, Angela M. and {Coil}, Alison L. and {Hearin}, Andrew P. and {Moustakas}, John},\n title = \"{PRIMUS: Clustering of Star-forming and Quiescent Central Galaxies at 0.2 < z < 0.9}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: halos, galaxies: high-redshift, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = oct,\n volume = {884},\n number = {1},\n eid = {76},\n pages = {76},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab3b5d},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1903.03127},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...884...76B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kakos2024,\n author = {{Kakos}, James and {Rodr{\\'\\i}guez-Puebla}, Aldo and {Primack}, Joel R. and {Faber}, Sandra M. and {Koo}, David C. and {Behroozi}, Peter and {Avila-Reese}, Vladimir},\n title = \"{Star-forming and quiescent central galaxies cluster similarly: implications for the galaxy-halo connection}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = sep,\n volume = {533},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3585-3610},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae1969},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2403.01393},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533.3585K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n%---------------------------------- Quiescent vs Star-forming ----------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{deGraaff2025,\n author = {{de Graaff}, Anna and {Setton}, David J. and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Cutler}, Sam and {Suess}, Katherine A. and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Leja}, Joel and {Weibel}, Andrea and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Boogaard}, Leindert A. and {Cleri}, Nikko J. and {De Lucia}, Gabriella and {Franx}, Marijn and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Matthee}, Jorryt and {McConachie}, Ian and {Naidu}, Rohan P. and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Price}, Sedona H. and {Rix}, Hans-Walter and {Valentino}, Francesco and {Wang}, Bingjie and {Williams}, Christina C.},\n title = \"{Efficient formation of a massive quiescent galaxy at redshift 4.9}\",\n journal = {Nature Astronomy},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = feb,\n volume = {9},\n pages = {280-292},\n doi = {10.1038/s41550-024-02424-3},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2404.05683},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025NatAs...9..280D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dashyan2019,\n author = {{Dashyan}, Gohar and {Choi}, Ena and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Naab}, Thorsten and {Quirk}, Amanda C.~N. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Ostriker}, Jeremiah P.},\n title = \"{AGN-driven quenching of satellite galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = aug,\n volume = {487},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5889-5901},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz1697},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1906.07431},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.5889D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Geha2012,\n author = {{Geha}, M. and {Blanton}, M.~R. and {Yan}, R. and {Tinker}, J.~L.},\n title = \"{A Stellar Mass Threshold for Quenching of Field Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: dwarf, galaxies: stellar content, methods: statistical, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = sep,\n volume = {757},\n number = {1},\n eid = {85},\n pages = {85},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/85},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1206.3573},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757...85G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Singh2025,\n author = {{Singh}, Akriti and {Guaita}, Lucia and {Hibon}, Pascale and {H{\\\"a}u{\\ss}ler}, Boris and {Lee}, Kyoung-Soo and {Ramakrishnan}, Vandana and {Kumar}, Ankit and {Padilla}, Nelson and {Firestone}, Nicole M. and {Song}, Hyunmi and {Artale}, Maria Celeste and {Hwang}, Ho Seong and {Iribarren}, Paulina Troncoso and {Gronwall}, Caryl and {Gawiser}, Eric and {Nantais}, Julie and {Valdes}, Francisco and {Park}, Changbom and {Yang}, Yujin},\n title = \"{Quenching of galaxies at cosmic noon: Understanding the effect of the environment}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, large-scale structure of Universe, infrared: galaxies, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = aug,\n volume = {700},\n eid = {A68},\n pages = {A68},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202452406},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2411.12722},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...700A..68S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Shuntov2026b,\n author = {{Shuntov}, Marko and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Lagos}, Claudia del P. and {Toft}, Sune and {Valentino}, Francesco and {Mercier}, Wilfried and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Binh}, Nguyen and {Brinch}, Malte and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Gentile}, Fabrizio and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Haghjoo}, Aryana and {Harish}, Santosh and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Huertas-Company}, Marc and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Laigle}, Clotilde and {Lewis}, Joseph S.~W. and {Magdis}, Georgios E. and {Joy McCracken}, Henry and {Mobasher}, Bahram and {Moutard}, Thibaud and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Paquereau}, Louise and {Renzini}, Alvio and {Rich}, Michael R. and {Sanders}, David B. and {Toni}, Greta and {Tresse}, Laurence and {Weibel}, Andrea and {Weaver}, John R. and {Yang}, Lilan},\n title = \"{The stellar mass function of quiescent and star-forming galaxies and its dependence on morphology in COSMOS-Web}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: abundances, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2026,\n month = mar,\n volume = {707},\n eid = {A391},\n pages = {A391},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202558022},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2511.05259},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026A&A...707A.391S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mobasher2005,\n author = {{Mobasher}, B. and {Dickinson}, M. and {Ferguson}, H.~C. and {Giavalisco}, M. and {Wiklind}, T. and {Stark}, D. and {Ellis}, R.~S. and {Fall}, S.~M. and {Grogin}, N.~A. and {Moustakas}, L.~A. and {Panagia}, N. and {Sosey}, M. and {Stiavelli}, M. and {Bergeron}, E. and {Casertano}, S. and {Ingraham}, P. and {Koekemoer}, A. and {Labb{\\'e}}, I. and {Livio}, M. and {Rodgers}, B. and {Scarlata}, C. and {Vernet}, J. and {Renzini}, A. and {Rosati}, P. and {Kuntschner}, H. and {K{\\\"u}mmel}, M. and {Walsh}, J.~R. and {Chary}, R. and {Eisenhardt}, P. and {Pirzkal}, N. and {Stern}, D.},\n title = \"{Evidence for a Massive Poststarburst Galaxy at z\\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde6.5}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Observations, Galaxies: Formation, Galaxies: High-Redshift, Galaxies: Photometry, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = dec,\n volume = {635},\n number = {2},\n pages = {832-844},\n doi = {10.1086/497626},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0509768},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...635..832M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ramakrishnan2019,\n author = {{Ramakrishnan}, Sujatha and {Paranjape}, Aseem and {Hahn}, Oliver and {Sheth}, Ravi K.},\n title = \"{Cosmic web anisotropy is the primary indicator of halo assembly bias}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, cosmology: theory, dark matter, large-scale structure of the Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = nov,\n volume = {489},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2977-2996},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz2344},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1903.02007},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.2977R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Codis2015,\n author = {{Codis}, Sandrine and {Pichon}, Christophe and {Pogosyan}, Dmitry},\n title = \"{Spin alignments within the cosmic web: a theory of constrained tidal torques near filaments}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, cosmology: theory, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = oct,\n volume = {452},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3369-3393},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv1570},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1504.06073},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452.3369C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Musso2018,\n author = {{Musso}, M. and {Cadiou}, C. and {Pichon}, C. and {Codis}, S. and {Kraljic}, K. and {Dubois}, Y.},\n title = \"{How does the cosmic web impact assembly bias?}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = jun,\n volume = {476},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4877-4906},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty191},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1709.00834},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.4877M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Gouin2025,\n author = {{Euclid Collaboration: Gouin}, C. and {Laigle}, C. and {Sarron}, F. and {Bonnaire}, T. and {Sorce}, J.~G. and {Aghanim}, N. and {Magliocchetti}, M. and {Quilley}, L. and {Boldrini}, P. and {Durret}, F. and {Pichon}, C. and {Kuchner}, U. and {Malavasi}, N. and {Kraljic}, K. and {Gavazzi}, R. and {Kang}, Y. and {Stanford}, S.~A. and {Awad}, P. and {Altieri}, B. and {Amara}, A. and {Andreon}, S. and {Auricchio}, N. and {Aussel}, H. and {Baccigalupi}, C. and {Baldi}, M. and {Balestra}, A. and {Bardelli}, S. and {Basset}, A. and {Battaglia}, P. and {Bernardeau}, F. and {Biviano}, A. and {Bonchi}, A. and {Branchini}, E. and {Brescia}, M. and {Brinchmann}, J. and {Camera}, S. and {Ca{\\~n}as-Herrera}, G. and {Capobianco}, V. and {Carbone}, C. and {Carretero}, J. and {Castellano}, M. and {Castignani}, G. and {Cavuoti}, S. and {Chambers}, K.~C. and {Cimatti}, A. and {Colodro-Conde}, C. and {Congedo}, G. and {Conselice}, C.~J. and {Conversi}, L. and {Copin}, Y. and {Courbin}, F. and {Courtois}, H.~M. and {Cropper}, M. and {Da Silva}, A. and {Degaudenzi}, H. and {de la Torre}, S. and {De Lucia}, G. and {Di Giorgio}, A.~M. and {Dolding}, C. and {Dole}, H. and {Dubath}, F. and {Duncan}, C.~A.~J. and {Dupac}, X. and {Ealet}, A. and {Escoffier}, S. and {Fabricius}, M. and {Farina}, M. and {Faustini}, F. and {Ferriol}, S. and {Finelli}, F. and {Fotopoulou}, S. and {Frailis}, M. and {Franceschi}, E. and {Galeotta}, S. and {George}, K. and {Gillis}, B. and {Giocoli}, C. and {G{\\'o}mez-Alvarez}, P. and {Gracia-Carpio}, J. and {Granett}, B.~R. and {Grazian}, A. and {Grupp}, F. and {Gwyn}, S. and {Haugan}, S.~V.~H. and {Holmes}, W. and {Hook}, I.~M. and {Hormuth}, F. and {Hornstrup}, A. and {Hudelot}, P. and {Jahnke}, K. and {Jhabvala}, M. and {Joachimi}, B. and {Keih{\\\"a}nen}, E. and {Kermiche}, S. and {Kiessling}, A. and {Kilbinger}, M. and {Kubik}, B. and {K{\\\"u}mmel}, M. and {Kunz}, M. and {Kurki-Suonio}, H. and {Lahav}, O. and {Le Boulc'h}, Q. and {Le Brun}, A.~M.~C. and {Le Mignant}, D. and {Liebing}, P. and {Ligori}, S. and {Lilje}, P.~B. and {Lindholm}, V. and {Lloro}, I. and {Mainetti}, G. and {Maino}, D. and {Maiorano}, E. and {Mansutti}, O. and {Marcin}, S. and {Marggraf}, O. and {Martinelli}, M. and {Martinet}, N. and {Marulli}, F. and {Massey}, R. and {Maurogordato}, S. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Medinaceli}, E. and {Mei}, S. and {Mellier}, Y. and {Meneghetti}, M. and {Merlin}, E. and {Meylan}, G. and {Mora}, A. and {Moresco}, M. and {Moscardini}, L. and {Nakajima}, R. and {Neissner}, C. and {Niemi}, S. -M. and {Nightingale}, J.~W. and {Padilla}, C. and {Paltani}, S. and {Pasian}, F. and {Peacock}, J.~A. and {Pedersen}, K. and {Percival}, W.~J. and {Pettorino}, V. and {Pires}, S. and {Polenta}, G. and {Poncet}, M. and {Popa}, L.~A. and {Pozzetti}, L. and {Raison}, F. and {Rebolo}, R. and {Renzi}, A. and {Rhodes}, J. and {Riccio}, G. and {Romelli}, E. and {Roncarelli}, M. and {Rusholme}, B. and {Saglia}, R. and {Sakr}, Z. and {S{\\'a}nchez}, A.~G. and {Sapone}, D. and {Sartoris}, B. and {Schewtschenko}, J.~A. and {Schirmer}, M. and {Schneider}, P. and {Schrabback}, T. and {Scodeggio}, M. and {Secroun}, A. and {Seidel}, G. and {Serrano}, S. and {Simon}, P. and {Sirignano}, C. and {Sirri}, G. and {Skottfelt}, J. and {Stanco}, L. and {Steinwagner}, J. and {Tallada-Cresp{\\'\\i}}, P. and {Tavagnacco}, D. and {Taylor}, A.~N. and {Teplitz}, H.~I. and {Tereno}, I. and {Tessore}, N. and {Toft}, S. and {Toledo-Moreo}, R. and {Torradeflot}, F. and {Tsyganov}, A. and {Tutusaus}, I. and {Valenziano}, L. and {Valiviita}, J. and {Vassallo}, T. and {Verdoes Kleijn}, G. and {Veropalumbo}, A. and {Wang}, Y. and {Weller}, J. and {Zacchei}, A. and {Zamorani}, G. and {Zerbi}, F.~M. and {Zucca}, E. and {Allevato}, V. and {Ballardini}, M. and {Bolzonella}, M. and {Bozzo}, E.},\n title = \"{Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1). The role of cosmic connectivity in shaping galaxy clusters}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = mar,\n eid = {arXiv:2503.15332},\n pages = {arXiv:2503.15332},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2503.15332},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2503.15332},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250315332E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Malavasi2017,\n author = {{Malavasi}, N. and {Arnouts}, S. and {Vibert}, D. and {de la Torre}, S. and {Moutard}, T. and {Pichon}, C. and {Davidzon}, I. and {Kraljic}, K. and {Bolzonella}, M. and {Guzzo}, L. and {Garilli}, B. and {Scodeggio}, M. and {Granett}, B.~R. and {Abbas}, U. and {Adami}, C. and {Bottini}, D. and {Cappi}, A. and {Cucciati}, O. and {Franzetti}, P. and {Fritz}, A. and {Iovino}, A. and {Krywult}, J. and {Le Brun}, V. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, O. and {Maccagni}, D. and {Ma{\\l}ek}, K. and {Marulli}, F. and {Polletta}, M. and {Pollo}, A. and {Tasca}, L. and {Tojeiro}, R. and {Vergani}, D. and {Zanichelli}, A. and {Bel}, J. and {Branchini}, E. and {Coupon}, J. and {De Lucia}, G. and {Dubois}, Y. and {Hawken}, A. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Laigle}, C. and {Moscardini}, L. and {Sousbie}, T. and {Treyer}, M. and {Zamorani}, G.},\n title = \"{The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS): galaxy segregation inside filaments at z ≃ 0.7}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: statistics, cosmology: observations, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2017,\n month = mar,\n volume = {465},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3817-3822},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw2864},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1611.07045},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.3817M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wang2025,\n author = {{Wang}, Sen and {Xu}, Dandan and {Lu}, Shengdong},\n title = \"{From Larger-scale Cold-gas Angular Momentum Environments to Galaxy Star Formation Activity}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy formation, Hydrodynamical simulations, Large-scale structure of the universe, 594, 595, 767, 902, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = jun,\n volume = {986},\n number = {1},\n eid = {85},\n pages = {85},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/add155},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2411.16849},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...986...85W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{DiMatteo2007,\n author = {{Di Matteo}, P. and {Combes}, F. and {Melchior}, A. -L. and {Semelin}, B.},\n title = \"{Star formation efficiency in galaxy interactions and mergers: a statistical study}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: starburst, methods: numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = jun,\n volume = {468},\n number = {1},\n pages = {61-81},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20066959},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0703212},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...468...61D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hopkins2007,\n author = {{Hopkins}, Philip F. and {Bundy}, Kevin and {Hernquist}, Lars and {Ellis}, Richard S.},\n title = \"{Observational Evidence for the Coevolution of Galaxy Mergers, Quasars, and the Blue/Red Galaxy Transition}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Quasars: General, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = apr,\n volume = {659},\n number = {2},\n pages = {976-996},\n doi = {10.1086/512091},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0601621},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...659..976H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Davies2022,\n author = {{Davies}, Jonathan J. and {Pontzen}, Andrew and {Crain}, Robert A.},\n title = \"{Galaxy mergers can initiate quenching by unlocking an AGN-driven transformation of the baryon cycle}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, (galaxies:) quasars: supermassive black holes, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = sep,\n volume = {515},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1430-1443},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac1742},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2203.08157},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.1430D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dubois2016,\n author = {{Dubois}, Yohan and {Peirani}, S{\\'e}bastien and {Pichon}, Christophe and {Devriendt}, Julien and {Gavazzi}, Rapha{\\\"e}l and {Welker}, Charlotte and {Volonteri}, Marta},\n title = \"{The HORIZON-AGN simulation: morphological diversity of galaxies promoted by AGN feedback}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = dec,\n volume = {463},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3948-3964},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw2265},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1606.03086},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.463.3948D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Calabro2019,\n author = {{Calabr{\\`o}}, Antonello and {Daddi}, Emanuele and {Fensch}, J{\\'e}r{\\'e}my and {Bournaud}, Fr{\\'e}d{\\'e}ric and {Cibinel}, Anna and {Puglisi}, Annagrazia and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Delvecchio}, Ivan and {D'Eugenio}, Chiara},\n title = \"{Merger induced clump formation in distant infrared luminous starburst galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: structure, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: starburst, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = dec,\n volume = {632},\n eid = {A98},\n pages = {A98},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201935778},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1910.01661},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...632A..98C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Darvish2014,\n author = {{Darvish}, B. and {Sobral}, D. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Scoville}, N.~Z. and {Best}, P. and {Sales}, L.~V. and {Smail}, I.},\n title = \"{Cosmic Web and Star Formation Activity in Galaxies at z \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde 1}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: star formation, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2014,\n month = nov,\n volume = {796},\n number = {1},\n eid = {51},\n pages = {51},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/51},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1409.7695},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...796...51D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tinsley1968,\n author = {{Tinsley}, Beatrice M.},\n title = \"{Evolution of the Stars and Gas in Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1968,\n month = feb,\n volume = {151},\n pages = {547},\n doi = {10.1086/149455},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968ApJ...151..547T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{deVaucouleurs1959,\n author = {{de Vaucouleurs}, Gerard},\n title = \"{Classification and Morphology of External Galaxies.}\",\n journal = {Handbuch der Physik},\n year = 1959,\n month = jan,\n volume = {53},\n pages = {275},\n doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-45932-0_7},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1959HDP....53..275D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wild2016,\n author = {{Wild}, Vivienne and {Almaini}, Omar and {Dunlop}, Jim and {Simpson}, Chris and {Rowlands}, Kate and {Bowler}, Rebecca and {Maltby}, David and {McLure}, Ross},\n title = \"{The evolution of post-starburst galaxies from z=2 to 0.5}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = nov,\n volume = {463},\n number = {1},\n pages = {832-844},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw1996},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1608.00588},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.463..832W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Salim2007,\n author = {{Salim}, Samir and {Rich}, R. Michael and {Charlot}, St{\\'e}phane and {Brinchmann}, Jarle and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Schiminovich}, David and {Seibert}, Mark and {Mallery}, Ryan and {Heckman}, Timothy M. and {Forster}, Karl and {Friedman}, Peter G. and {Martin}, D. Christopher and {Morrissey}, Patrick and {Neff}, Susan G. and {Small}, Todd and {Wyder}, Ted K. and {Bianchi}, Luciana and {Donas}, Jos{\\'e} and {Lee}, Young-Wook and {Madore}, Barry F. and {Milliard}, Bruno and {Szalay}, Alex S. and {Welsh}, Barry Y. and {Yi}, Sukyoung K.},\n title = \"{UV Star Formation Rates in the Local Universe}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Fundamental Parameters, Surveys, Ultraviolet: Galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = dec,\n volume = {173},\n number = {2},\n pages = {267-292},\n doi = {10.1086/519218},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0704.3611},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..173..267S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Smethurst2015,\n author = {{Smethurst}, R.~J. and {Lintott}, C.~J. and {Simmons}, B.~D. and {Schawinski}, K. and {Marshall}, P.~J. and {Bamford}, S. and {Fortson}, L. and {Kaviraj}, S. and {Masters}, K.~L. and {Melvin}, T. and {Nichol}, R.~C. and {Skibba}, R.~A. and {Willett}, K.~W.},\n title = \"{Galaxy Zoo: evidence for diverse star formation histories through the green valley}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: general, galaxies: photometry, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = jun,\n volume = {450},\n number = {1},\n pages = {435-453},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv161},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1501.05955},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.450..435S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Skibba2009,\n author = {{Skibba}, Ramin A. and {Bamford}, Steven P. and {Nichol}, Robert C. and {Lintott}, Chris J. and {Andreescu}, Dan and {Edmondson}, Edward M. and {Murray}, Phil and {Raddick}, M. Jordan and {Schawinski}, Kevin and {Slosar}, An{\\v{z}}e and {Szalay}, Alexander S. and {Thomas}, Daniel and {Vandenberg}, Jan},\n title = \"{Galaxy Zoo: disentangling the environmental dependence of morphology and colour}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: structure, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = oct,\n volume = {399},\n number = {2},\n pages = {966-982},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15334.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0811.3970},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.399..966S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wang2018,\n author = {{Wang}, Huiyuan and {Mo}, H.~J. and {Chen}, Sihan and {Yang}, Yang and {Yang}, Xiaohu and {Wang}, Enci and {van den Bosch}, Frank C. and {Jing}, Yipeng and {Kang}, Xi and {Lin}, Weipeng and {Lim}, S.~H. and {Huang}, Shuiyao and {Lu}, Yi and {Li}, Shijie and {Cui}, Weiguang and {Zhang}, Youcai and {Tweed}, Dylan and {Wei}, Chengliang and {Li}, Guoliang and {Shi}, Feng},\n title = \"{ELUCID. IV. Galaxy Quenching and its Relation to Halo Mass, Environment, and Assembly Bias}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark matter, large-scale structure of universe, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: groups: general, galaxies: halos, methods: statistical, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = jan,\n volume = {852},\n number = {1},\n eid = {31},\n pages = {31},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aa9e01},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1707.09002},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...852...31W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Contini2020,\n author = {{Contini}, E. and {Gu}, Q. and {Ge}, X. and {Rhee}, J. and {Yi}, S.~K. and {Kang}, X.},\n title = \"{The Roles of Mass and Environment in the Quenching of Galaxies. II.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy formation, Galaxy evolution, 595, 594, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = feb,\n volume = {889},\n number = {2},\n eid = {156},\n pages = {156},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab6730},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2001.01369},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...889..156C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Woo2013,\n author = {{Woo}, Joanna and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Faber}, S.~M. and {Noeske}, Kai and {Koo}, David C. and {Gerke}, Brian F. and {Cooper}, Michael C. and {Salim}, Samir and {Dutton}, Aaron A. and {Newman}, Jeffrey and {Weiner}, Benjamin J. and {Bundy}, Kevin and {Willmer}, Christopher N.~A. and {Davis}, Marc and {Yan}, Renbin},\n title = \"{Dependence of galaxy quenching on halo mass and distance from its centre}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: groups: general, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = feb,\n volume = {428},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3306-3326},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sts274},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1203.1625},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.428.3306W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Strateva2001,\n author = {{Strateva}, Iskra and {Ivezi{\\'c}}, {\\v{Z}}eljko and {Knapp}, Gillian R. and {Narayanan}, Vijay K. and {Strauss}, Michael A. and {Gunn}, James E. and {Lupton}, Robert H. and {Schlegel}, David and {Bahcall}, Neta A. and {Brinkmann}, Jon and {Brunner}, Robert J. and {Budav{\\'a}ri}, Tam{\\'a}s and {Csabai}, Istv{\\'a}n and {Castander}, Francisco Javier and {Doi}, Mamoru and {Fukugita}, Masataka and {Gy{\\H{o}}ry}, Zsuzsanna and {Hamabe}, Masaru and {Hennessy}, Greg and {Ichikawa}, Takashi and {Kunszt}, Peter Z. and {Lamb}, Don Q. and {McKay}, Timothy A. and {Okamura}, Sadanori and {Racusin}, Judith and {Sekiguchi}, Maki and {Schneider}, Donald P. and {Shimasaku}, Kazuhiro and {York}, Donald},\n title = \"{Color Separation of Galaxy Types in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Imaging Data}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Fundamental Parameters, Astrophysics},\n year = 2001,\n month = oct,\n volume = {122},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1861-1874},\n doi = {10.1086/323301},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0107201},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122.1861S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Blanton2003,\n author = {{Blanton}, Michael R. and {Hogg}, David W. and {Bahcall}, Neta A. and {Baldry}, Ivan K. and {Brinkmann}, J. and {Csabai}, Istv{\\'a}n and {Eisenstein}, Daniel and {Fukugita}, Masataka and {Gunn}, James E. and {Ivezi{\\'c}}, {\\v{Z}}eljko and {Lamb}, D.~Q. and {Lupton}, Robert H. and {Loveday}, Jon and {Munn}, Jeffrey A. and {Nichol}, R.~C. and {Okamura}, Sadanori and {Schlegel}, David J. and {Shimasaku}, Kazuhiro and {Strauss}, Michael A. and {Vogeley}, Michael S. and {Weinberg}, David H.},\n title = \"{The Broadband Optical Properties of Galaxies with Redshifts 0.02<z<0.22}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Fundamental Parameters, Galaxies: Photometry, Galaxies: Statistics, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = sep,\n volume = {594},\n number = {1},\n pages = {186-207},\n doi = {10.1086/375528},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0209479},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...594..186B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Coil2017,\n author = {{Coil}, Alison L. and {Mendez}, Alexander J. and {Eisenstein}, Daniel J. and {Moustakas}, John},\n title = \"{PRIMUS+DEEP2: The Dependence of Galaxy Clustering on Stellar Mass and Specific Star Formation Rate at 0.2 < z < 1.2}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: halos, galaxies: high-redshift, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = apr,\n volume = {838},\n number = {2},\n eid = {87},\n pages = {87},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aa63ec},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1609.09090},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...838...87C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Baldry2004,\n author = {{Baldry}, Ivan K. and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Brinkmann}, Jon and {Ivezi{\\'c}}, {\\v{Z}}eljko and {Lupton}, Robert H. and {Nichol}, Robert C. and {Szalay}, Alexander S.},\n title = \"{Quantifying the Bimodal Color-Magnitude Distribution of Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Fundamental Parameters, Galaxies: Luminosity Function, Mass Function, Galaxies: Photometry, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = jan,\n volume = {600},\n number = {2},\n pages = {681-694},\n doi = {10.1086/380092},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0309710},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...600..681B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Boselli2022,\n author = {{Boselli}, Alessandro and {Fossati}, Matteo and {Sun}, Ming},\n title = \"{Ram pressure stripping in high-density environments}\",\n journal = {\\aapr},\n keywords = {Galaxies: evolution, Galaxies: interactions, Galaxies: interstellar medium, Galaxies: star formation, Galaxies: cluster: general, Galaxies: cluster: intracluster medium, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = dec,\n volume = {30},\n number = {1},\n eid = {3},\n pages = {3},\n doi = {10.1007/s00159-022-00140-3},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2109.13614},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&ARv..30....3B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Boselli2006,\n author = {{Boselli}, Alessandro and {Gavazzi}, Giuseppe},\n title = \"{Environmental Effects on Late-Type Galaxies in Nearby Clusters}\",\n journal = {\\pasp},\n keywords = {Galaxy: General, globular clusters: individual (Virgo), globular clusters: individual (A1367), globular clusters: individual (Coma), Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = apr,\n volume = {118},\n number = {842},\n pages = {517-559},\n doi = {10.1086/500691},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0601108},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006PASP..118..517B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Moutard2018,\n author = {{Moutard}, Thibaud and {Sawicki}, Marcin and {Arnouts}, St{\\'e}phane and {Golob}, Anneya and {Malavasi}, Nicola and {Adami}, Christophe and {Coupon}, Jean and {Ilbert}, Olivier},\n title = \"{On the fast quenching of young low-mass galaxies up to z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 0.6: new spotlight on the lead role of environment}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: distances and redshifts, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: photometry, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = sep,\n volume = {479},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2147-2160},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty1543},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1802.07628},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.2147M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sato2014,\n author = {{Sato}, Taro and {Sawicki}, Marcin and {Arcila-Osejo}, Liz},\n title = \"{Angular clustering of z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 2 star-forming and passive galaxies in 2.5 square degrees of deep CFHT imaging}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: statistics, cosmology: observations, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = sep,\n volume = {443},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2661-2678},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu1356},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1407.2319},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.443.2661S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Martis2016,\n author = {{Martis}, Nicholas S. and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Brammer}, Gabriel B. and {Muzzin}, Adam and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Momcheva}, Ivelina G. and {Skelton}, Rosalind E. and {Stefanon}, Mauro and {van Dokkum}, Pieter G. and {Whitaker}, Katherine E.},\n title = \"{The Evolution of the Fractions of Quiescent and Star-forming Galaxies as a Function of Stellar Mass Since z = 3: Increasing Importance of Massive, Dusty Star-forming Galaxies in the Early Universe}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = aug,\n volume = {827},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L25},\n pages = {L25},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8205/827/2/L25},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1606.04090},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827L..25M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Muzzin2013,\n author = {{Muzzin}, Adam and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Stefanon}, Mauro and {Franx}, Marijn and {McCracken}, Henry J. and {Milvang-Jensen}, Bo and {Dunlop}, James S. and {Fynbo}, J.~P.~U. and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {van Dokkum}, Pieter G.},\n title = \"{The Evolution of the Stellar Mass Functions of Star-forming and Quiescent Galaxies to z = 4 from the COSMOS/UltraVISTA Survey}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = nov,\n volume = {777},\n number = {1},\n eid = {18},\n pages = {18},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/18},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1303.4409},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...777...18M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Whitaker2011,\n author = {{Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {van Dokkum}, Pieter G. and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Kriek}, Mariska and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Quadri}, Ryan F. and {Franx}, Marijn and {Muzzin}, Adam and {Williams}, Rik J. and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Illingworth}, Garth D. and {Lee}, Kyoung-Soo and {Lundgren}, Britt and {Nelson}, Erica J. and {Rudnick}, Gregory and {Tal}, Tomer and {Wake}, David A.},\n title = \"{The NEWFIRM Medium-band Survey: Photometric Catalogs, Redshifts, and the Bimodal Color Distribution of Galaxies out to z \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde 3}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {catalogs, galaxies: distances and redshifts, galaxies: high-redshift, surveys, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = jul,\n volume = {735},\n number = {2},\n eid = {86},\n pages = {86},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/86},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1105.4609},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...735...86W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Straatman2016,\n author = {{Straatman}, Caroline M.~S. and {Spitler}, Lee R. and {Quadri}, Ryan F. and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Persson}, S. Eric and {Papovich}, Casey and {Tran}, Kim-Vy H. and {Brammer}, Gabriel B. and {Cowley}, Michael and {Tomczak}, Adam and {Nanayakkara}, Themiya and {Alcorn}, Leo and {Allen}, Rebecca and {Broussard}, Adam and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Forrest}, Ben and {van Houdt}, Josha and {Kacprzak}, Glenn G. and {Kawinwanichakij}, Lalitwadee and {Kelson}, Daniel D. and {Lee}, Janice and {McCarthy}, Patrick J. and {Mehrtens}, Nicola and {Monson}, Andrew and {Murphy}, David and {Rees}, Glen and {Tilvi}, Vithal and {Whitaker}, Katherine E.},\n title = \"{The FourStar Galaxy Evolution Survey (ZFOURGE): Ultraviolet to Far-infrared Catalogs, Medium-bandwidth Photometric Redshifts with Improved Accuracy, Stellar Masses, and Confirmation of Quiescent Galaxies to z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 3.5}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, infrared: galaxies, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = oct,\n volume = {830},\n number = {1},\n eid = {51},\n pages = {51},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/51},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1608.07579},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...830...51S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{vandenBosch2003,\n author = {{van den Bosch}, Frank C. and {Yang}, Xiaohu and {Mo}, H.~J.},\n title = \"{Linking early- and late-type galaxies to their dark matter haloes}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: formation, dark matter, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = apr,\n volume = {340},\n number = {3},\n pages = {771-792},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06335.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0210495},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.340..771V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Valentino2020,\n author = {{Valentino}, Francesco and {Tanaka}, Masayuki and {Davidzon}, Iary and {Toft}, Sune and {G{\\'o}mez-Guijarro}, Carlos and {Stockmann}, Mikkel and {Onodera}, Masato and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Ceverino}, Daniel and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Gallazzi}, Anna and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Kubo}, Mariko and {Magdis}, Georgios E. and {Selsing}, Jonatan and {Shimakawa}, Rhythm and {Sparre}, Martin and {Steinhardt}, Charles and {Yabe}, Kiyoto and {Zabl}, Johannes},\n title = \"{Quiescent Galaxies 1.5 Billion Years after the Big Bang and Their Progenitors}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Elliptical galaxies, Galaxy stellar content, Star formation, High-redshift galaxies, Starburst galaxies, 594, 456, 621, 1569, 734, 1570, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = feb,\n volume = {889},\n number = {2},\n eid = {93},\n pages = {93},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab64dc},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1909.10540},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...889...93V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Schreiber2018,\n author = {{Schreiber}, C. and {Glazebrook}, K. and {Nanayakkara}, T. and {Kacprzak}, G.~G. and {Labb{\\'e}}, I. and {Oesch}, P. and {Yuan}, T. and {Tran}, K. -V. and {Papovich}, C. and {Spitler}, L. and {Straatman}, C.},\n title = \"{Near infrared spectroscopy and star-formation histories of 3 {\\ensuremath{\\leq}} z {\\ensuremath{\\leq}} 4 quiescent galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {techniques: spectroscopic, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = oct,\n volume = {618},\n eid = {A85},\n pages = {A85},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201833070},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1807.02523},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...618A..85S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Marsan2022,\n author = {{Marsan}, Z. Cemile and {Muzzin}, Adam and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Stefanon}, Mauro and {Martis}, Nicholas and {Annunziatella}, Marianna and {Chan}, Jeffrey C.~C. and {Cooper}, Michael C. and {Forrest}, Ben and {Gomez}, Percy and {McConachie}, Ian and {Wilson}, Gillian},\n title = \"{The Number Densities and Stellar Populations of Massive Galaxies at 3 < z < 6: A Diverse, Rapidly Forming Population in the Early Universe}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {594, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = jan,\n volume = {924},\n number = {1},\n eid = {25},\n pages = {25},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac312a},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2010.04725},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...924...25M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kalita2021,\n author = {{Kalita}, Boris S. and {Daddi}, Emanuele and {D'Eugenio}, Chiara and {Valentino}, Francesco and {Rich}, R. Michael and {G{\\'o}mez-Guijarro}, Carlos and {Coogan}, Rosemary T. and {Delvecchio}, Ivan and {Elbaz}, David and {Neill}, James D. and {Puglisi}, Annagrazia and {Strazzullo}, Veronica},\n title = \"{An Ancient Massive Quiescent Galaxy Found in a Gas-rich z 3 Group}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {High-redshift galaxies, Galaxy evolution, Galaxy groups, 734, 594, 597, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = aug,\n volume = {917},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L17},\n pages = {L17},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ac16dc},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2107.13241},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...917L..17K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kubo2021,\n author = {{Kubo}, Mariko and {Umehata}, Hideki and {Matsuda}, Yuichi and {Kajisawa}, Masaru and {Steidel}, Charles C. and {Yamada}, Toru and {Tanaka}, Ichi and {Hatsukade}, Bunyo and {Tamura}, Yoichi and {Nakanishi}, Kouichiro and {Kohno}, Kotaro and {Lee}, Kianhong and {Matsuda}, Keiichi},\n title = \"{A Massive Quiescent Galaxy Confirmed in a Protocluster at z = 3.09}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy environments, Giant elliptical galaxies, Protoclusters, 594, 2029, 651, 1297, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = sep,\n volume = {919},\n number = {1},\n eid = {6},\n pages = {6},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac0cf8},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2106.10798},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...919....6K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{McConachie2022,\n author = {{McConachie}, Ian and {Wilson}, Gillian and {Forrest}, Ben and {Marsan}, Z. Cemile and {Muzzin}, Adam and {Cooper}, M.~C. and {Annunziatella}, Marianna and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Chan}, Jeffrey C.~C. and {Gomez}, Percy and {Abdullah}, Mohamed H. and {Saracco}, Paolo and {Nantais}, Julie},\n title = \"{Spectroscopic Confirmation of a Protocluster at z = 3.37 with a High Fraction of Quiescent Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {584, 2007, 734, 902, 181, 2016, 594, 1569, 2029, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = feb,\n volume = {926},\n number = {1},\n eid = {37},\n pages = {37},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac2b9f},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2109.07696},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...926...37M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ito2023,\n author = {{Ito}, Kei and {Tanaka}, Masayuki and {Valentino}, Francesco and {Toft}, Sune and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Gould}, Katriona M.~L. and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Kashikawa}, Nobunari and {Kubo}, Mariko and {Liang}, Yongming and {McCracken}, Henry J. and {Weaver}, John R.},\n title = \"{COSMOS2020: Discovery of a Protocluster of Massive Quiescent Galaxies at z = 2.77}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, High-redshift galaxy clusters, Galaxy environments, Galaxy quenching, Quenched galaxies, 594, 2007, 2029, 2040, 2016, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = mar,\n volume = {945},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L9},\n pages = {L9},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/acb49b},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2301.08845},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...945L...9I},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Alberts2024,\n author = {{Alberts}, Stacey and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Helton}, Jakob M. and {Suess}, Katherine A. and {Ji}, Zhiyuan and {Shivaei}, Irene and {Lyu}, Jianwei and {Rieke}, George and {Baker}, William M. and {Bonaventura}, Nina and {Bunker}, Andrew J. and {Carniani}, Stefano and {Charlot}, Stephane and {Curtis-Lake}, Emma and {D'Eugenio}, Francesco and {Eisenstein}, Daniel J. and {de Graaff}, Anna and {Hainline}, Kevin N. and {Hausen}, Ryan and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Maiolino}, Roberto and {Parlanti}, Eleonora and {Rieke}, Marcia J. and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Sun}, Yang and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Willmer}, Christopher N.~A. and {Willott}, Chris J.},\n title = \"{To High Redshift and Low Mass: Exploring the Emergence of Quenched Galaxies and Their Environments at 3 < z < 6 in the Ultra-deep JADES MIRI F770W Parallel}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, High-redshift galaxies, Dwarf galaxies, Galaxy environments, Galaxy quenching, 594, 734, 416, 2029, 2040, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = nov,\n volume = {975},\n number = {1},\n eid = {85},\n pages = {85},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cc},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2312.12207},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975...85A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Oyarzun2022,\n author = {{Oyarz{\\'u}n}, Grecco A. and {Bundy}, Kevin and {Westfall}, Kyle B. and {Tinker}, Jeremy L. and {Belfiore}, Francesco and {Argudo-Fern{\\'a}ndez}, Maria and {Zheng}, Zheng and {Conroy}, Charlie and {Masters}, Karen L. and {Wake}, David and {Law}, David R. and {McDermid}, Richard M. and {Arag{\\'o}n-Salamanca}, Alfonso and {Parikh}, Taniya and {Yan}, Renbin and {Bershady}, Matthew and {S{\\'a}nchez}, Sebasti{\\'a}n F. and {Andrews}, Brett H. and {Fern{\\'a}ndez-Trincado}, Jos{\\'e} G. and {Lane}, Richard R. and {Bizyaev}, D. and {Boardman}, Nicholas Fraser and {Lacerna}, Ivan and {Brownstein}, J.~R. and {Drory}, Niv and {Zhang}, Kai},\n title = \"{SDSS-IV MaNGA: How the Stellar Populations of Passive Central Galaxies Depend on Stellar and Halo Mass}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Early-type galaxies, Elliptical galaxies, Galaxies, Galaxy ages, Galaxy evolution, Galaxy stellar content, Quenched galaxies, Galaxy abundances, Galaxy dark matter halos, Galaxy environments, Galaxy properties, Galaxy spectroscopy, 429, 456, 573, 576, 594, 621, 2016, 574, 1880, 2029, 615, 2171, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2022,\n month = jul,\n volume = {933},\n number = {1},\n eid = {88},\n pages = {88},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac7048},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2205.12999},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...933...88O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{ScholzDiaz2024,\n author = {{Scholz-D{\\'\\i}az}, Laura and {Mart{\\'\\i}n-Navarro}, Ignacio and {Falc{\\'o}n-Barroso}, Jes{\\'u}s and {Lyubenova}, Mariya and {van de Ven}, Glenn},\n title = \"{Baryonic properties of nearby galaxies across the stellar-to-total dynamical mass relation}\",\n journal = {Nature Astronomy},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = may,\n volume = {8},\n pages = {648-656},\n doi = {10.1038/s41550-024-02209-8},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2402.12439},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024NatAs...8..648S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{ScholzDiaz2022,\n author = {{Scholz-D{\\'\\i}az}, Laura and {Mart{\\'\\i}n-Navarro}, Ignacio and {Falc{\\'o}n-Barroso}, Jes{\\'u}s},\n title = \"{The dark side of galaxy stellar populations - I. The stellar-to-halo mass relation and the velocity dispersion-halo mass relation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = apr,\n volume = {511},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4900-4920},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac361},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2202.03441},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.511.4900S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mandelbaum2016,\n author = {{Mandelbaum}, Rachel and {Wang}, Wenting and {Zu}, Ying and {White}, Simon and {Henriques}, Bruno and {More}, Surhud},\n title = \"{Strong bimodality in the host halo mass of central galaxies from galaxy-galaxy lensing}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: weak, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: stellar content, cosmology: observations, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = apr,\n volume = {457},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3200-3218},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw188},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1509.06762},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457.3200M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{RodriguezPuebla2015,\n author = {{Rodr{\\'\\i}guez-Puebla}, Aldo and {Avila-Reese}, Vladimir and {Yang}, Xiaohu and {Foucaud}, Sebastien and {Drory}, Niv and {Jing}, Y.~P.},\n title = \"{The Stellar-to-Halo Mass Relation of Local Galaxies Segregates by Color}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark matter, galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: halos, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = feb,\n volume = {799},\n number = {2},\n eid = {130},\n pages = {130},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/130},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1408.5407},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...799..130R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{More2011,\n author = {{More}, Surhud and {van den Bosch}, Frank C. and {Cacciato}, Marcello and {Skibba}, Ramin and {Mo}, H.~J. and {Yang}, Xiaohu},\n title = \"{Satellite kinematics - III. Halo masses of central galaxies in SDSS}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: structure, dark matter, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = jan,\n volume = {410},\n number = {1},\n pages = {210-226},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17436.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1003.3203},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.410..210M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Peng2010,\n author = {{Peng}, Ying-jie and {Lilly}, Simon J. and {Kova{\\v{c}}}, Katarina and {Bolzonella}, Micol and {Pozzetti}, Lucia and {Renzini}, Alvio and {Zamorani}, Gianni and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Knobel}, Christian and {Iovino}, Angela and {Maier}, Christian and {Cucciati}, Olga and {Tasca}, Lidia and {Carollo}, C. Marcella and {Silverman}, John and {Kampczyk}, Pawel and {de Ravel}, Loic and {Sanders}, David and {Scoville}, Nicholas and {Contini}, Thierry and {Mainieri}, Vincenzo and {Scodeggio}, Marco and {Kneib}, Jean-Paul and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, Olivier and {Bardelli}, Sandro and {Bongiorno}, Angela and {Caputi}, Karina and {Coppa}, Graziano and {de la Torre}, Sylvain and {Franzetti}, Paolo and {Garilli}, Bianca and {Lamareille}, Fabrice and {Le Borgne}, Jean-Francois and {Le Brun}, Vincent and {Mignoli}, Marco and {Perez Montero}, Enrique and {Pello}, Roser and {Ricciardelli}, Elena and {Tanaka}, Masayuki and {Tresse}, Laurence and {Vergani}, Daniela and {Welikala}, Niraj and {Zucca}, Elena and {Oesch}, Pascal and {Abbas}, Ummi and {Barnes}, Luke and {Bordoloi}, Rongmon and {Bottini}, Dario and {Cappi}, Alberto and {Cassata}, Paolo and {Cimatti}, Andrea and {Fumana}, Marco and {Hasinger}, Gunther and {Koekemoer}, Anton and {Leauthaud}, Alexei and {Maccagni}, Dario and {Marinoni}, Christian and {McCracken}, Henry and {Memeo}, Pierdomenico and {Meneux}, Baptiste and {Nair}, Preethi and {Porciani}, Cristiano and {Presotto}, Valentina and {Scaramella}, Roberto},\n title = \"{Mass and Environment as Drivers of Galaxy Evolution in SDSS and zCOSMOS and the Origin of the Schechter Function}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, galaxies: active, galaxies: distances and redshifts, galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = sep,\n volume = {721},\n number = {1},\n pages = {193-221},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/193},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1003.4747},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...721..193P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Peng2012,\n author = {{Peng}, Ying-jie and {Lilly}, Simon J. and {Renzini}, Alvio and {Carollo}, Marcella},\n title = \"{Mass and Environment as Drivers of Galaxy Evolution. II. The Quenching of Satellite Galaxies as the Origin of Environmental Effects}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: groups: general, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = sep,\n volume = {757},\n number = {1},\n eid = {4},\n pages = {4},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/4},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1106.2546},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757....4P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Wetzel2012,\n author = {{Wetzel}, Andrew R. and {Tinker}, Jeremy L. and {Conroy}, Charlie},\n title = \"{Galaxy evolution in groups and clusters: star formation rates, red sequence fractions and the persistent bimodality}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: groups: general, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Galaxy Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = jul,\n volume = {424},\n number = {1},\n pages = {232-243},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21188.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1107.5311},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.424..232W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Weaver2023,\n author = {{Weaver}, J.~R. and {Davidzon}, I. and {Toft}, S. and {Ilbert}, O. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Gould}, K.~M.~L. and {Jespersen}, C.~K. and {Steinhardt}, C. and {Lagos}, C.~D.~P. and {Capak}, P.~L. and {Casey}, C.~M. and {Chartab}, N. and {Faisst}, A.~L. and {Hayward}, C.~C. and {Kartaltepe}, J.~S. and {Kauffmann}, O.~B. and {Koekemoer}, A.~M. and {Kokorev}, V. and {Laigle}, C. and {Liu}, D. and {Long}, A. and {Magdis}, G.~E. and {McPartland}, C.~J.~R. and {Milvang-Jensen}, B. and {Mobasher}, B. and {Moneti}, A. and {Peng}, Y. and {Sanders}, D.~B. and {Shuntov}, M. and {Sneppen}, A. and {Valentino}, F. and {Zalesky}, L. and {Zamorani}, G.},\n title = \"{COSMOS2020: The galaxy stellar mass function. The assembly and star formation cessation of galaxies at 0.2< z {\\ensuremath{\\leq}} 7.5}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: statistics, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = sep,\n volume = {677},\n eid = {A184},\n pages = {A184},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202245581},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2212.02512},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A.184W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Brinchmann2004,\n author = {{Brinchmann}, J. and {Charlot}, S. and {White}, S.~D.~M. and {Tremonti}, C. and {Kauffmann}, G. and {Heckman}, T. and {Brinkmann}, J.},\n title = \"{The physical properties of star-forming galaxies in the low-redshift Universe}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {surveys, galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: general, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = jul,\n volume = {351},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1151-1179},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07881.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0311060},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.351.1151B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kauffmann2003,\n author = {{Kauffmann}, Guinevere and {Heckman}, Timothy M. and {White}, Simon D.~M. and {Charlot}, St{\\'e}phane and {Tremonti}, Christy and {Brinchmann}, Jarle and {Bruzual}, Gustavo and {Peng}, Eric W. and {Seibert}, Mark and {Bernardi}, Mariangela and {Blanton}, Michael and {Brinkmann}, Jon and {Castander}, Francisco and {Cs{\\'a}bai}, Istvan and {Fukugita}, Masataka and {Ivezic}, Zeljko and {Munn}, Jeffrey A. and {Nichol}, Robert C. and {Padmanabhan}, Nikhil and {Thakar}, Aniruddha R. and {Weinberg}, David H. and {York}, Donald},\n title = \"{Stellar masses and star formation histories for {}10$^{5}$ galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = may,\n volume = {341},\n number = {1},\n pages = {33-53},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0204055},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.341...33K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kauffmann2004,\n author = {{Kauffmann}, Guinevere and {White}, Simon D.~M. and {Heckman}, Timothy M. and {M{\\'e}nard}, Brice and {Brinchmann}, Jarle and {Charlot}, St{\\'e}phane and {Tremonti}, Christy and {Brinkmann}, Jon},\n title = \"{The environmental dependence of the relations between stellar mass, structure, star formation and nuclear activity in galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = sep,\n volume = {353},\n number = {3},\n pages = {713-731},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08117.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0402030},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.353..713K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Baldry2006,\n author = {{Baldry}, I.~K. and {Balogh}, M.~L. and {Bower}, R.~G. and {Glazebrook}, K. and {Nichol}, R.~C. and {Bamford}, S.~P. and {Budavari}, T.},\n title = \"{Galaxy bimodality versus stellar mass and environment}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = dec,\n volume = {373},\n number = {2},\n pages = {469-483},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11081.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0607648},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.373..469B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Davis&Geller1976,\n author = {{Davis}, Marc and {Geller}, Margaret J.},\n title = \"{Galaxy Correlations as a Function of Morphological Type}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1976,\n month = aug,\n volume = {208},\n pages = {13-19},\n doi = {10.1086/154575},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...208...13D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dressler1980,\n author = {{Dressler}, A.},\n title = \"{Galaxy morphology in rich clusters: implications for the formation and evolution of galaxies.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Elliptical Galaxies, Galactic Clusters, Galactic Evolution, Galactic Structure, Spiral Galaxies, Astronomical Maps, Density Distribution, Interstellar Gas, Telescopes, Universe, X Ray Astronomy, Astrophysics},\n year = 1980,\n month = mar,\n volume = {236},\n pages = {351-365},\n doi = {10.1086/157753},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ApJ...236..351D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Oemler1974,\n author = {{Oemler}, Jr., Augustus},\n title = \"{The Systematic Properties of Clusters of Galaxies. Photometry of 15 Clusters}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1974,\n month = nov,\n volume = {194},\n pages = {1-20},\n doi = {10.1086/153216},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...194....1O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tinker2013,\n author = {{Tinker}, Jeremy L. and {Leauthaud}, Alexie and {Bundy}, Kevin and {George}, Matthew R. and {Behroozi}, Peter and {Massey}, Richard and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Wechsler}, Risa H.},\n title = \"{Evolution of the Stellar-to-dark Matter Relation: Separating Star-forming and Passive Galaxies from z = 1 to 0}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {cosmology: observations, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: halos, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = dec,\n volume = {778},\n number = {2},\n eid = {93},\n pages = {93},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/93},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1308.2974},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...778...93T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Berti2021,\n author = {{Berti}, Angela M. and {Coil}, Alison L. and {Hearin}, Andrew P. and {Behroozi}, Peter S.},\n title = \"{Main-sequence Scatter is Real: The Joint Dependence of Galaxy Clustering on Star Formation and Stellar Mass}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Galaxies, Clustering, Galaxy evolution, Large-scale structure of the universe, 573, 1908, 594, 902, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = jan,\n volume = {161},\n number = {1},\n eid = {49},\n pages = {49},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-3881/abcc6a},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2009.02405},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161...49B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Cowley2019,\n author = {{Cowley}, William I. and {Caputi}, Karina I. and {Deshmukh}, Smaran and {Ashby}, Matthew L.~N. and {Fazio}, Giovanni G. and {Le F{\\`e}vre}, Olivier and {Fynbo}, Johan P.~U. and {Ilbert}, Oliver and {Milvang-Jensen}, Bo},\n title = \"{The Stellar-to-halo Mass Ratios of Passive and Star-forming Galaxies at z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 2-3 from the SMUVS Survey}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, large-scale structure of universe, methods: statistical, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = apr,\n volume = {874},\n number = {2},\n eid = {114},\n pages = {114},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab089b},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1901.10455},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...874..114C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Song2021,\n author = {{Song}, Hyunmi and {Laigle}, Clotilde and {Hwang}, Ho Seong and {Devriendt}, Julien and {Dubois}, Yohan and {Kraljic}, Katarina and {Pichon}, Christophe and {Slyz}, Adrianne and {Smith}, Rory},\n title = \"{Beyond halo mass: quenching galaxy mass assembly at the edge of filaments}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, cosmology: theory, cosmology: large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = mar,\n volume = {501},\n number = {3},\n pages = {4635-4656},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa3981},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2009.00013},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.4635S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Sun2007,\n author = {{Sun}, M. and {Donahue}, M. and {Voit}, G.~M.},\n title = \"{H{\\ensuremath{\\alpha}} Tail, Intracluster H II Regions, and Star Formation: ESO 137-001 in Abell 3627}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Clusters: Individual: Alphanumeric: A3627, Galaxies: Evolution, galaxies: individual (ESO 137-001), Galaxies: ISM, ISM: H II Regions, Stars: Formation, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = dec,\n volume = {671},\n number = {1},\n pages = {190-202},\n doi = {10.1086/522690},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0706.1220},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...671..190S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kawata2008,\n author = {{Kawata}, Daisuke and {Mulchaey}, John S.},\n title = \"{Strangulation in Galaxy Groups}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: stellar content, methods: numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = jan,\n volume = {672},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L103},\n doi = {10.1086/526544},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0707.3814},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...672L.103K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Yttergren2021,\n author = {{Yttergren}, M. and {Misquitta}, P. and {S{\\'a}nchez-Monge}, {\\'A}. and {Valencia-S}, M. and {Eckart}, A. and {Zensus}, A. and {Peitl-Thiesen}, T.},\n title = \"{Gas and stellar dynamics in Stephan's Quintet. Mapping the kinematics in a closely interacting compact galaxy group}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: groups: individual: Stephan's Quintet, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = dec,\n volume = {656},\n eid = {A83},\n pages = {A83},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202040188},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2109.13757},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...656A..83Y},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lotz2011,\n author = {{Lotz}, Jennifer M. and {Jonsson}, Patrik and {Cox}, T.~J. and {Croton}, Darren and {Primack}, Joel R. and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Stewart}, Kyle},\n title = \"{The Major and Minor Galaxy Merger Rates at z < 1.5}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = dec,\n volume = {742},\n number = {2},\n eid = {103},\n pages = {103},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/103},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1108.2508},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...742..103L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lotz2008,\n author = {{Lotz}, Jennifer M. and {Jonsson}, Patrik and {Cox}, T.~J. and {Primack}, Joel R.},\n title = \"{Galaxy merger morphologies and time-scales from simulations of equal-mass gas-rich disc mergers}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = dec,\n volume = {391},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1137-1162},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14004.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0805.1246},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.391.1137L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lotz2010b,\n author = {{Lotz}, Jennifer M. and {Jonsson}, Patrik and {Cox}, T.~J. and {Primack}, Joel R.},\n title = \"{The effect of gas fraction on the morphology and time-scales of disc galaxy mergers}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = may,\n volume = {404},\n number = {2},\n pages = {590-603},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16269.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0912.1593},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.404..590L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lotz2010a,\n author = {{Lotz}, Jennifer M. and {Jonsson}, Patrik and {Cox}, T.~J. and {Primack}, Joel R.},\n title = \"{The effect of mass ratio on the morphology and time-scales of disc galaxy mergers}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = may,\n volume = {404},\n number = {2},\n pages = {575-589},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16268.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0912.1590},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.404..575L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Pearson2019,\n author = {{Pearson}, W.~J. and {Wang}, L. and {Alpaslan}, M. and {Baldry}, I. and {Bilicki}, M. and {Brown}, M.~J.~I. and {Grootes}, M.~W. and {Holwerda}, B.~W. and {Kitching}, T.~D. and {Kruk}, S. and {van der Tak}, F.~F.~S.},\n title = \"{Effect of galaxy mergers on star-formation rates}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: interactions, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: starburst, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = nov,\n volume = {631},\n eid = {A51},\n pages = {A51},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201936337},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1908.10115},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...631A..51P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mihos1994,\n author = {{Mihos}, J. Christopher and {Hernquist}, Lars},\n title = \"{Triggering of Starbursts in Galaxies by Minor Mergers}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Astronomical Models, Computerized Simulation, Cosmology, Disk Galaxies, Dwarf Galaxies, Galactic Evolution, Galactic Structure, Interacting Galaxies, Starburst Galaxies, Deposition, Galactic Bulge, Hydrodynamics, Interstellar Matter, Many Body Problem, Stellar Evolution, Trees (Mathematics), Astrophysics, GALAXIES: INTERACTIONS, GALAXIES: STARBURST, GALAXIES: EVOLUTION, GALAXIES: STRUCTURE},\n year = 1994,\n month = apr,\n volume = {425},\n pages = {L13},\n doi = {10.1086/187299},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...425L..13M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Newman2012,\n author = {{Newman}, Andrew B. and {Ellis}, Richard S. and {Bundy}, Kevin and {Treu}, Tommaso},\n title = \"{Can Minor Merging Account for the Size Growth of Quiescent Galaxies? New Results from the CANDELS Survey}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = feb,\n volume = {746},\n number = {2},\n eid = {162},\n pages = {162},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/162},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1110.1637},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...746..162N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Guo2015,\n author = {{Guo}, Yicheng and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Bell}, Eric F. and {Koo}, David C. and {Conselice}, Christopher J. and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Kassin}, Susan and {Lu}, Yu and {Lucas}, Ray and {Mandelker}, Nir and {McIntosh}, Daniel H. and {Primack}, Joel R. and {Ravindranath}, Swara and {Barro}, Guillermo and {Ceverino}, Daniel and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Faber}, Sandra M. and {Fang}, Jerome J. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Noeske}, Kai and {Rafelski}, Marc and {Straughn}, Amber},\n title = \"{Clumpy Galaxies in CANDELS. I. The Definition of UV Clumps and the Fraction of Clumpy Galaxies at 0.5 < z < 3}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: irregular, galaxies: starburst, galaxies: star formation, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = feb,\n volume = {800},\n number = {1},\n eid = {39},\n pages = {39},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/39},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1410.7398},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...800...39G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{BoylanKolchin2008,\n author = {{Boylan-Kolchin}, Michael and {Ma}, Chung-Pei and {Quataert}, Eliot},\n title = \"{Dynamical friction and galaxy merging time-scales}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = jan,\n volume = {383},\n number = {1},\n pages = {93-101},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12530.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0707.2960},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.383...93B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{DeLucia&Blaizot2007,\n author = {{De Lucia}, Gabriella and {Blaizot}, J{\\'e}r{\\'e}my},\n title = \"{The hierarchical formation of the brightest cluster galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = feb,\n volume = {375},\n number = {1},\n pages = {2-14},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11287.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0606519},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.375....2D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@INPROCEEDINGS{Mihos2004,\n author = {{Mihos}, J.~C.},\n title = \"{The Evolution of Tidal Debris}\",\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n booktitle = {Recycling Intergalactic and Interstellar Matter},\n year = 2004,\n editor = {{Duc}, Pierre-Alain and {Braine}, Jonathan and {Brinks}, Elias},\n series = {IAU Symposium},\n volume = {217},\n month = jun,\n pages = {390},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0401557},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0401557},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004IAUS..217..390M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Toomre&Toomre1972,\n author = {{Toomre}, Alar and {Toomre}, Juri},\n title = \"{Galactic Bridges and Tails}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1972,\n month = dec,\n volume = {178},\n pages = {623-666},\n doi = {10.1086/151823},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972ApJ...178..623T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Cox2008,\n author = {{Cox}, T.~J. and {Jonsson}, Patrik and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Primack}, Joel R. and {Dekel}, Avishai},\n title = \"{The effect of galaxy mass ratio on merger-driven starbursts}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: starburst, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = feb,\n volume = {384},\n number = {1},\n pages = {386-409},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12730.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0709.3511},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.384..386C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kitzbichler2008,\n author = {{Kitzbichler}, M.~G. and {White}, S.~D.~M.},\n title = \"{A calibration of the relation between the abundance of close galaxy pairs and the rate of galaxy mergers}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: general, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = dec,\n volume = {391},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1489-1498},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13873.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0804.1965},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.391.1489K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Mastropietro2005,\n author = {{Mastropietro}, Chiara and {Moore}, Ben and {Mayer}, Lucio and {Debattista}, Victor P. and {Piffaretti}, Rocco and {Stadel}, Joachim},\n title = \"{Morphological evolution of discs in clusters}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: N-body simulations, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: dwarf, galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = dec,\n volume = {364},\n number = {2},\n pages = {607-619},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09579.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0411648},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.364..607M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Conselice2018,\n author = {{Conselice}, Christopher J.},\n title = \"{Ultra-diffuse Galaxies Are a Subset of Cluster Dwarf Elliptical/Spheroidal Galaxies}\",\n journal = {Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = mar,\n volume = {2},\n number = {1},\n eid = {43},\n pages = {43},\n doi = {10.3847/2515-5172/aab7f6},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1803.06927},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018RNAAS...2...43C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lisker2007,\n author = {{Lisker}, Thorsten and {Grebel}, Eva K. and {Binggeli}, Bruno and {Glatt}, Katharina},\n title = \"{Virgo Cluster Early-Type Dwarf Galaxies with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. III. Subpopulations: Distributions, Shapes, Origins}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Clusters: Individual: Name: Virgo, Galaxies: Dwarf, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Fundamental Parameters, Galaxies: Statistics, Galaxies: Structure, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = may,\n volume = {660},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1186-1197},\n doi = {10.1086/513090},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0701429},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...660.1186L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Moore1998,\n author = {{Moore}, Ben and {Lake}, George and {Katz}, Neal},\n title = \"{Morphological Transformation from Galaxy Harassment}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: EVOLUTION, GALAXIES: INTERACTIONS, GALAXIES: STARBURST, GALAXIES: STRUCTURE, METHODS: NUMERICAL, Galaxies: Evolution, Galaxies: Interactions, Galaxies: Starburst, Galaxies: Structure, Methods: Numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 1998,\n month = mar,\n volume = {495},\n number = {1},\n pages = {139-151},\n doi = {10.1086/305264},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9701211},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...495..139M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Farouki&Shapiro1981,\n author = {{Farouki}, R. and {Shapiro}, S.~L.},\n title = \"{Computer simulations of environmental influences on galaxy evolution in dense clusters. II - Rapid tidal encounters}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Astronomical Models, Computerized Simulation, Disk Galaxies, Galactic Clusters, Galactic Evolution, Tides, Angular Momentum, Elliptical Galaxies, Galactic Structure, Isophotes, Spiral Galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 1981,\n month = jan,\n volume = {243},\n pages = {32-41},\n doi = {10.1086/158563},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ApJ...243...32F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Boselli2016,\n author = {{Boselli}, A. and {Roehlly}, Y. and {Fossati}, M. and {Buat}, V. and {Boissier}, S. and {Boquien}, M. and {Burgarella}, D. and {Ciesla}, L. and {Gavazzi}, G. and {Serra}, P.},\n title = \"{Quenching of the star formation activity in cluster galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: clusters: individual: Virgo, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: ISM, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = nov,\n volume = {596},\n eid = {A11},\n pages = {A11},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201629221},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1609.00545},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...596A..11B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Gunn&Gott1972,\n author = {{Gunn}, James E. and {Gott}, III, J. Richard},\n title = \"{On the Infall of Matter Into Clusters of Galaxies and Some Effects on Their Evolution}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1972,\n month = aug,\n volume = {176},\n pages = {1},\n doi = {10.1086/151605},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972ApJ...176....1G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bruggen&DeLucia2008,\n author = {{Br{\\\"u}ggen}, M. and {De Lucia}, G.},\n title = \"{Ram-pressure histories of cluster galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, intergalactic medium, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = feb,\n volume = {383},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1336-1342},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12670.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0710.5580},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.383.1336B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Steinhauser2016,\n author = {{Steinhauser}, Dominik and {Schindler}, Sabine and {Springel}, Volker},\n title = \"{Simulations of ram-pressure stripping in galaxy-cluster interactions}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: clusters: general, methods: numerical, galaxies: interactions, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = jun,\n volume = {591},\n eid = {A51},\n pages = {A51},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201527705},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1604.05193},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...591A..51S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Larson1980,\n author = {{Larson}, R.~B. and {Tinsley}, B.~M. and {Caldwell}, C.~N.},\n title = \"{The evolution of disk galaxies and the origin of S0 galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Disk Galaxies, Galactic Evolution, Spiral Galaxies, Digital Simulation, Galactic Structure, Gas Evolution, Stellar Evolution, Stellar Magnitude, Astrophysics},\n year = 1980,\n month = may,\n volume = {237},\n pages = {692-707},\n doi = {10.1086/157917},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ApJ...237..692L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Peng2015,\n author = {{Peng}, Y. and {Maiolino}, R. and {Cochrane}, R.},\n title = \"{Strangulation as the primary mechanism for shutting down star formation in galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = may,\n volume = {521},\n number = {7551},\n pages = {192-195},\n doi = {10.1038/nature14439},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1505.03143},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Natur.521..192P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Maier2016,\n author = {{Maier}, C. and {Kuchner}, U. and {Ziegler}, B.~L. and {Verdugo}, M. and {Balestra}, I. and {Girardi}, M. and {Mercurio}, A. and {Rosati}, P. and {Fritz}, A. and {Grillo}, C. and {Nonino}, M. and {Sartoris}, B.},\n title = \"{CLASH-VLT: Strangulation of cluster galaxies in MACS J0416.1-2403 as seen from their chemical enrichment}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: clusters: individual: MACS, J0416.1-2403, galaxies: star formation, galaxies:, abundances, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = may,\n volume = {590},\n eid = {A108},\n pages = {A108},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201628223},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1602.00686},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...590A.108M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bekki2002,\n author = {{Bekki}, Kenji and {Couch}, Warrick J. and {Shioya}, Yasuhiro},\n title = \"{Passive Spiral Formation from Halo Gas Starvation: Gradual Transformation into S0s}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Clusters: General, Galaxies: Elliptical and Lenticular, cD, Galaxies: Formation, Galaxies: Interactions, Galaxies: ISM, Astrophysics},\n year = 2002,\n month = oct,\n volume = {577},\n number = {2},\n pages = {651-657},\n doi = {10.1086/342221},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0206207},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...577..651B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{McCarthy2008,\n author = {{McCarthy}, I.~G. and {Frenk}, C.~S. and {Font}, A.~S. and {Lacey}, C.~G. and {Bower}, R.~G. and {Mitchell}, N.~L. and {Balogh}, M.~L. and {Theuns}, T.},\n title = \"{Ram pressure stripping the hot gaseous haloes of galaxies in groups and clusters}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {hydrodynamics, methods: N-body simulations, galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: structure, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = jan,\n volume = {383},\n number = {2},\n pages = {593-605},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12577.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0710.0964},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.383..593M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Masters2010,\n author = {{Masters}, Karen L. and {Mosleh}, Moein and {Romer}, A. Kathy and {Nichol}, Robert C. and {Bamford}, Steven P. and {Schawinski}, Kevin and {Lintott}, Chris J. and {Andreescu}, Dan and {Campbell}, Heather C. and {Crowcroft}, Ben and {Doyle}, Isabelle and {Edmondson}, Edward M. and {Murray}, Phil and {Raddick}, M. Jordan and {Slosar}, An{\\v{z}}e and {Szalay}, Alexander S. and {Vandenberg}, Jan},\n title = \"{Galaxy Zoo: passive red spirals}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {surveys, galaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: photometry, galaxies: spiral, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = jun,\n volume = {405},\n number = {2},\n pages = {783-799},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16503.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0910.4113},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.405..783M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{DarraghFord2019,\n author = {{Darragh Ford}, E. and {Laigle}, C. and {Gozaliasl}, G. and {Pichon}, C. and {Devriendt}, J. and {Slyz}, A. and {Arnouts}, S. and {Dubois}, Y. and {Finoguenov}, A. and {Griffiths}, R. and {Kraljic}, K. and {Pan}, H. and {Peirani}, S. and {Sarron}, F.},\n title = \"{Group connectivity in COSMOS: a tracer of mass assembly history}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, methods: observational, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: photometry, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2019,\n month = nov,\n volume = {489},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5695-5708},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz2490},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1904.11859},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.5695D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kraljic2018,\n author = {{Kraljic}, K. and {Arnouts}, S. and {Pichon}, C. and {Laigle}, C. and {de la Torre}, S. and {Vibert}, D. and {Cadiou}, C. and {Dubois}, Y. and {Treyer}, M. and {Schimd}, C. and {Codis}, S. and {de Lapparent}, V. and {Devriendt}, J. and {Hwang}, H.~S. and {Le Borgne}, D. and {Malavasi}, N. and {Milliard}, B. and {Musso}, M. and {Pogosyan}, D. and {Alpaslan}, M. and {Bland-Hawthorn}, J. and {Wright}, A.~H.},\n title = \"{Galaxy evolution in the metric of the cosmic web}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: observations, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: statistics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = feb,\n volume = {474},\n number = {1},\n pages = {547-571},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx2638},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1710.02676},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474..547K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kraljic2020,\n author = {{Kraljic}, Katarina and {Pichon}, Christophe and {Codis}, Sandrine and {Laigle}, Clotilde and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel and {Dubois}, Yohan and {Hwang}, Ho Seong and {Pogosyan}, Dmitri and {Arnouts}, St{\\'e}phane and {Devriendt}, Julien and {Musso}, Marcello and {Peirani}, S{\\'e}bastien and {Slyz}, Adrianne and {Treyer}, Marie},\n title = \"{The impact of the connectivity of the cosmic web on the physical properties of galaxies at its nodes}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {surveys, galaxies: formation, large-scale structure of Universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2020,\n month = jan,\n volume = {491},\n number = {3},\n pages = {4294-4309},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz3319},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1910.08066},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491.4294K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kleiner2017,\n author = {{Kleiner}, Dane and {Pimbblet}, Kevin A. and {Jones}, D. Heath and {Koribalski}, B{\\\"a}rbel S. and {Serra}, Paolo},\n title = \"{Evidence for H I replenishment in massive galaxies through gas accretion from the cosmic web}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: general, large-scale structure of Universe, radio lines: galaxies, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = apr,\n volume = {466},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4692-4710},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw3328},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1701.03467},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466.4692K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Odekon2018,\n author = {{Crone Odekon}, Mary and {Hallenbeck}, Gregory and {Haynes}, Martha P. and {Koopmann}, Rebecca A. and {Phi}, An and {Wolfe}, Pierre-Francois},\n title = \"{The Effect of Filaments and Tendrils on the H I Content of Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: general, galaxies: ISM, galaxies: spiral, galaxies: statistics, large-scale structure of universe, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = jan,\n volume = {852},\n number = {2},\n eid = {142},\n pages = {142},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aaa1e8},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1712.05045},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...852..142C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dekel2020,\n author = {{Dekel}, Avishai and {Ginzburg}, Omri and {Jiang}, Fangzhou and {Freundlich}, Jonathan and {Lapiner}, Sharon and {Ceverino}, Daniel and {Primack}, Joel},\n title = \"{A mass threshold for galactic gas discs by spin flips}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: spirals, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2020,\n month = apr,\n volume = {493},\n number = {3},\n pages = {4126-4142},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa470},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1912.08213},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.4126D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Peng&Renzini2020,\n author = {{Peng}, Ying-jie and {Renzini}, Alvio},\n title = \"{Disc growth and quenching}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = jan,\n volume = {491},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L51-L55},\n doi = {10.1093/mnrasl/slz163},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1910.10446},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491L..51P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n%---------------------------------- High-z galaxies ----------------------------------\n@ARTICLE{Price2025,\n author = {{Price}, Sedona H. and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Labbe}, Ivo and {Furtak}, Lukas J. and {de Graaff}, Anna and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Setton}, David J. and {Suess}, Katherine A. and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Cutler}, Sam E. and {Leja}, Joel and {Pan}, Richard and {Wang}, Bingjie and {Weaver}, John R. and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Atek}, Hakim and {Burgasser}, Adam J. and {Chemerynska}, Iryna and {Dayal}, Pratika and {Feldmann}, Robert and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, Natascha M. and {Fudamoto}, Yoshinobu and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Goulding}, Andy D. and {Khullar}, Gourav and {Kriek}, Mariska and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {Miller}, Tim B. and {Muzzin}, Adam and {Nanayakkara}, Themiya and {Nelson}, Erica and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Shipley}, Heath and {Smit}, Renske and {Taylor}, Edward N. and {Dokkum}, Pieter van and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Zitrin}, Adi},\n title = \"{The UNCOVER Survey: First Release of Ultradeep JWST/NIRSpec PRISM Spectra for {\\ensuremath{\\sim}}700 Galaxies from z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 0.3{\\textendash}13 in A2744}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy formation, High-redshift galaxies, 594, 595, 734, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = mar,\n volume = {982},\n number = {1},\n eid = {51},\n pages = {51},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/adaec1},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2408.03920},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...982...51P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Perez2022,\n author = {{Perez}, Lucia A. and {Malhotra}, Sangeeta and {Rhoads}, James E. and {Laursen}, Peter and {Wold}, Isak G.~B.},\n title = \"{Probing Patchy Reionization with the Void Probability Function of Ly{\\ensuremath{\\alpha}} Emitters}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Reionization, Clustering, Lyman-alpha galaxies, Astronomical simulations, Large-scale structure of the universe, 1383, 1908, 978, 1857, 902, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = dec,\n volume = {940},\n number = {2},\n eid = {102},\n pages = {102},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac9b57},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2210.05722},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940..102P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tanaka2024,\n author = {{Tanaka}, Takumi S. and {Silverman}, John D. and {Shimasaku}, Kazuhiro and {Arita}, Junya and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Inayoshi}, Kohei and {Ding}, Xuheng and {Onoue}, Masafusa and {Liu}, Zhaoxuan and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Lambrides}, Erini and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Drakos}, Nicole and {Shen}, Yue and {Li}, Junyao and {Zhuang}, Mingyang and {Fei}, Qinyue and {Ito}, Kei and {Ren}, Wenke and {Matsui}, Suin and {Ando}, Makoto and {Hatano}, Shun and {Fujii}, Michiko S. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Liu}, Daizhong and {McCracken}, Henry Joy and {Rhodes}, Jason and {Robertson}, Brant E. and {Franco}, Maximilien and {Andika}, Irham T. and {Cloonan}, Aidan P. and {Fan}, Xiaohui and {Gozaliasl}, Ghassem and {Harish}, Santosh and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {Huertas-Company}, Marc and {Kakkad}, Darshan and {Kinugawa}, Tomoya and {Roy}, Namrata and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Talia}, Margherita and {Toft}, Sune and {Vijayan}, Aswin P. and {Zhang}, Yiyang},\n title = \"{Discovery of dual ``little red dots'' indicates excess clustering on kilo-parsec scales}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = dec,\n eid = {arXiv:2412.14246},\n pages = {arXiv:2412.14246},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2412.14246},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2412.14246},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241214246T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Atek2024,\n author = {{Atek}, Hakim and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Furtak}, Lukas J. and {Chemerynska}, Iryna and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Setton}, David J. and {Miller}, Tim B. and {Oesch}, Pascal and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Price}, Sedona H. and {Dayal}, Pratika and {Zitrin}, Adi and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Weaver}, John R. and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Dokkum}, Pieter van and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Cutler}, Sam E. and {Feldmann}, Robert and {Fudamoto}, Yoshinobu and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Leja}, Joel and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {Muzzin}, Adam and {Pan}, Richard and {Papovich}, Casey and {Nelson}, Erica J. and {Nanayakkara}, Themiya and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {Stefanon}, Mauro and {Suess}, Katherine A. and {Wang}, Bingjie and {Whitaker}, Katherine E.},\n title = \"{Most of the photons that reionized the Universe came from dwarf galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = feb,\n volume = {626},\n number = {8001},\n pages = {975-978},\n doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07043-6},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2308.08540},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Natur.626..975A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Naidu2025,\n author = {{Naidu}, Rohan P. and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Weibel}, Andrea and {Li}, Yijia and {Matthee}, Jorryt and {Chisolm}, John and {Pollock}, Clara L. and {Heintz}, Kasper E. and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Shen}, Xuejian and {Hviding}, Raphael E. and {Leja}, Joel and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Ganguly}, Arpita and {Witten}, Callum and {Atek}, Hakim and {Belli}, Siro and {Bose}, Sownak and {Bouwens}, Rychard and {Dayal}, Pratika and {Decarli}, Roberto and {de Graaff}, Anna and {Fudamoto}, Yoshinobu and {Giovinazzo}, Emma and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Illingworth}, Garth and {Inoue}, Akio K. and {Kane}, Sarah G. and {Labbe}, Ivo and {Leonova}, Ecaterina and {Marques-Chaves}, Rui and {Meyer}, Roman A. and {Nelson}, Erica J. and {Roberts-Borsani}, Guido and {Schaerer}, Daniel and {Simcoe}, Robert A. and {Stefanon}, Mauro and {Sugahara}, Yuma and {Toft}, Sune and {van der Wel}, Arjen and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Walter}, Fabian and {Watson}, Darrach and {Weaver}, John R. and {Whitaker}, Katherine E.},\n title = \"{A Cosmic Miracle: A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at zspec = 14.44 Confirmed with JWST}\",\n journal = {The Open Journal of Astrophysics},\n keywords = {Astrophysics of Galaxies, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Solar and Stellar Astrophysics},\n year = 2026,\n month = jan,\n volume = {9},\n pages = {56033},\n doi = {10.33232/001c.156033},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2505.11263},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026OJAp....956033N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Yung2024,\n author = {{Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Gardner}, Jonathan P.},\n title = \"{Are the ultra-high-redshift galaxies at z > 10 surprising in the context of standard galaxy formation models?}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jan,\n volume = {527},\n number = {3},\n pages = {5929-5948},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad3484},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2304.04348},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.5929Y},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kokorev2024b,\n author = {{Kokorev}, Vasily and {Caputi}, Karina I. and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Dayal}, Pratika and {Trebitsch}, Maxime and {Cutler}, Sam E. and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Miller}, Tim B. and {Iani}, Edoardo and {Navarro-Carrera}, Rafael and {Rinaldi}, Pierluigi},\n title = \"{A Census of Photometrically Selected Little Red Dots at 4 < z < 9 in JWST Blank Fields}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies, High-redshift galaxies, Active galaxies, Active galactic nuclei, 573, 734, 17, 16, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jun,\n volume = {968},\n number = {1},\n eid = {38},\n pages = {38},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2401.09981},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...968...38K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Furtak2023,\n author = {{Furtak}, Lukas J. and {Zitrin}, Adi and {Plat}, Ad{\\`e}le and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Wang}, Bingjie and {Nelson}, Erica J. and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Brammer}, Gabriel B. and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Endsley}, Ryan and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Leja}, Joel and {Price}, Sedona H. and {Smit}, Renske and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {Weaver}, John R. and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Atek}, Hakim and {Chevallard}, Jacopo and {Curtis-Lake}, Emma and {Dayal}, Pratika and {Feltre}, Anna and {Franx}, Marijn and {Fudamoto}, Yoshinobu and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Mowla}, Lamiya A. and {Pan}, Richard and {Suess}, Katherine A. and {Vidal-Garc{\\'\\i}a}, Alba and {Williams}, Christina C.},\n title = \"{JWST UNCOVER: Extremely Red and Compact Object at z $_{phot}$ ≃ 7.6 Triply Imaged by A2744}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {High-redshift galaxies, Low-luminosity active galactic nuclei, Reionization, Strong gravitational lensing, 734, 2033, 1383, 1643, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = aug,\n volume = {952},\n number = {2},\n eid = {142},\n pages = {142},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/acdc9d},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2212.10531},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...952..142F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kocevski2023,\n author = {{Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Onoue}, Masafusa and {Inayoshi}, Kohei and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {Arrabal Haro}, Pablo and {Grazian}, Andrea and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Aird}, James and {Holwerda}, Benne W. and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Juneau}, St{\\'e}phanie and {Amor{\\'\\i}n}, Ricardo O. and {Backhaus}, Bren E. and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Barro}, Guillermo and {Bell}, Eric F. and {Bisigello}, Laura and {Calabr{\\`o}}, Antonello and {Cleri}, Nikko J. and {Cooper}, M.~C. and {Ding}, Xuheng and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Ho}, Luis C. and {Hutchison}, Taylor A. and {Inoue}, Akio K. and {Jiang}, Linhua and {Jones}, Brenda and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Li}, Wenxiu and {Li}, Zhengrong and {McGrath}, Elizabeth J. and {Molina}, Juan and {Papovich}, Casey and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Pirzkal}, Nor and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Yang}, Guang and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron},\n title = \"{Hidden Little Monsters: Spectroscopic Identification of Low-mass, Broad-line AGNs at z > 5 with CEERS}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Quasars, Supermassive black holes, High-redshift galaxies, Active galactic nuclei, 1319, 1663, 734, 16, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = sep,\n volume = {954},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L4},\n pages = {L4},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2302.00012},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954L...4K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Natarajan2024,\n author = {{Natarajan}, Priyamvada and {Pacucci}, Fabio and {Ricarte}, Angelo and {Bogd{\\'a}n}, {\\'A}kos and {Goulding}, Andy D. and {Cappelluti}, Nico},\n title = \"{First Detection of an Overmassive Black Hole Galaxy UHZ1: Evidence for Heavy Black Hole Seed Formation from Direct Collapse}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Black holes, Quasars, Astrophysical black holes, Supermassive black holes, 162, 1319, 98, 1663, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jan,\n volume = {960},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L1},\n pages = {L1},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ad0e76},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2308.02654},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...960L...1N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Pacucci2023,\n author = {{Pacucci}, Fabio and {Nguyen}, Bao and {Carniani}, Stefano and {Maiolino}, Roberto and {Fan}, Xiaohui},\n title = \"{JWST CEERS and JADES Active Galaxies at z = 4-7 Violate the Local M $_{{\\textbullet}}$-M $_{{\\ensuremath{\\star}}}$ Relation at >3{\\ensuremath{\\sigma}}: Implications for Low-mass Black Holes and Seeding Models}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Active galaxies, Supermassive black holes, Galaxy evolution, Surveys, Early universe, 17, 1663, 594, 1671, 435, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2023,\n month = nov,\n volume = {957},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L3},\n pages = {L3},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ad0158},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2308.12331},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...957L...3P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lambrides2024,\n author = {{Lambrides}, Erini and {Larson}, Rebecca L. and {Garofali}, Kristen and {Ptak}, Andrew and {Chiaberge}, Marco and {Long}, Arianna S. and {Hutchison}, Taylor A. and {Norman}, Colin and {McKinney}, Jed and {Akins}, Hollis B. and {Berg}, Danielle A. and {Chisholm}, John and {Civano}, Francesca and {Cloonan}, Aidan P. and {Endsley}, Ryan and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Gilli}, Roberto and {Gillman}, Steven and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Pacucci}, Fabio and {Richardson}, Chris T. and {Stiavelli}, Massimo and {Whalen}, Kelly E.},\n title = \"{The case for super-Eddington accretion in JWST broad-line active galactic nuclei during the first billion years}\",\n journal = {Nature Astronomy},\n keywords = {High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2026,\n month = apr,\n doi = {10.1038/s41550-026-02813-w},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2409.13047},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026NatAs.tmp...66L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Volonteri2025,\n author = {{Volonteri}, M. and {Trebitsch}, M. and {Greene}, J.~E. and {Dubois}, Y. and {Dong-Paez}, C. -A. and {Habouzit}, M. and {Lupi}, A. and {Ma}, Y. and {Beckmann}, R.~S. and {Dayal}, P. and {Schneider}, R.},\n title = \"{Exploring active galactic nuclei and little red dots with the Obelisk simulation}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {black hole physics, galaxies: active, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = mar,\n volume = {695},\n eid = {A33},\n pages = {A33},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202451963},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2408.12854},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...695A..33V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Nanayakkara2024,\n author = {{Nanayakkara}, Themiya and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Jacobs}, Colin and {Kawinwanichakij}, Lalitwadee and {Schreiber}, Corentin and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Esdaile}, James and {Kacprzak}, Glenn G. and {Labbe}, Ivo and {Lagos}, Claudia and {Marchesini}, Danilo and {Marsan}, Z. Cemile and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Papovich}, Casey and {Remus}, Rhea-Silvia and {Tran}, Kim-Vy H.},\n title = \"{A population of faint, old, and massive quiescent galaxies at 3 <z <4 revealed by JWST NIRSpec Spectroscopy}\",\n journal = {Scientific Reports},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = feb,\n volume = {14},\n eid = {3724},\n pages = {3724},\n doi = {10.1038/s41598-024-52585-4},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2212.11638},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024NatSR..14.3724N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Valentino2023,\n author = {{Valentino}, Francesco and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Gould}, Katriona M.~L. and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Jespersen}, Christian Kragh and {Vijayan}, Aswin P. and {Weaver}, John R. and {Ito}, Kei and {Tanaka}, Masayuki and {Ilbert}, Olivier and {Magdis}, Georgios E. and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Faisst}, Andreas L. and {Gallazzi}, Anna and {Gillman}, Steven and {Gim{\\'e}nez-Arteaga}, Clara and {G{\\'o}mez-Guijarro}, Carlos and {Kubo}, Mariko and {Heintz}, Kasper E. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Oesch}, Pascal and {Onodera}, Masato and {Rizzo}, Francesca and {Lee}, Minju and {Strait}, Victoria and {Toft}, Sune},\n title = \"{An Atlas of Color-selected Quiescent Galaxies at z > 3 in Public JWST Fields}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, High-redshift galaxies, Galaxy quenching, Quenched galaxies, Post-starburst galaxies, Surveys, 594, 734, 2040, 2016, 2176, 1671, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = apr,\n volume = {947},\n number = {1},\n eid = {20},\n pages = {20},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/acbefa},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2302.10936},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...947...20V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Carnall2023,\n author = {{Carnall}, A.~C. and {McLeod}, D.~J. and {McLure}, R.~J. and {Dunlop}, J.~S. and {Begley}, R. and {Cullen}, F. and {Donnan}, C.~T. and {Hamadouche}, M.~L. and {Jewell}, S.~M. and {Jones}, E.~W. and {Pollock}, C.~L. and {Wild}, V.},\n title = \"{A surprising abundance of massive quiescent galaxies at 3 < z < 5 in the first data from JWST CEERS}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = apr,\n volume = {520},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3974-3985},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad369},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2208.00986},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.3974C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Park2024,\n author = {{Park}, Minjung and {Belli}, Sirio and {Conroy}, Charlie and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Davies}, Rebecca L. and {Leja}, Joel and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Mendel}, J. Trevor and {Benton}, Chlo{\\\"e} and {Bugiani}, Letizia and {Emami}, Razieh and {Khoram}, Amir H. and {Li}, Yijia and {Maheson}, Gabriel and {Mathews}, Elijah P. and {Naidu}, Rohan P. and {Nelson}, Erica J. and {Terrazas}, Bryan A. and {Weinberger}, Rainer},\n title = \"{Widespread Rapid Quenching at Cosmic Noon Revealed by JWST Deep Spectroscopy}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies, Galaxy formation, Galaxy evolution, Galaxy quenching, 573, 595, 594, 2040, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = nov,\n volume = {976},\n number = {1},\n eid = {72},\n pages = {72},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad7e15},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2404.17945},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...976...72P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kakimoto2024,\n author = {{Kakimoto}, Takumi and {Tanaka}, Masayuki and {Onodera}, Masato and {Shimakawa}, Rhythm and {Wu}, Po-Feng and {Gould}, Katriona M.~L. and {Ito}, Kei and {Jin}, Shuowen and {Kubo}, Mariko and {Suzuki}, Tomoko L. and {Toft}, Sune and {Valentino}, Francesco and {Yabe}, Kiyoto},\n title = \"{A Massive Quiescent Galaxy in a Group Environment at z = 4.53}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, High-redshift galaxies, Galaxy quenching, Quenched galaxies, Galaxy groups, Galaxy environments, 594, 734, 2040, 2016, 597, 2029, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = mar,\n volume = {963},\n number = {1},\n eid = {49},\n pages = {49},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad1ff1},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2308.15011},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...963...49K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Jin2024,\n author = {{Jin}, Shuowen and {Sillassen}, Nikolaj B. and {Magdis}, Georgios E. and {Brinch}, Malte and {Shuntov}, Marko and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Gobat}, Raphael and {Valentino}, Francesco and {Carnall}, Adam C. and {Lee}, Minju and {Vijayan}, Aswin P. and {Gillman}, Steven and {Kokorev}, Vasily and {Le Bail}, Aur{\\'e}lien and {Greve}, Thomas R. and {Gullberg}, Bitten and {Gould}, Katriona M.~L. and {Toft}, Sune},\n title = \"{Cosmic Vine: A z = 3.44 large-scale structure hosting massive quiescent galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: clusters: general, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: structure, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = mar,\n volume = {683},\n eid = {L4},\n pages = {L4},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202348540},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2311.04867},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...683L...4J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Strait2023,\n author = {{Strait}, Victoria and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Muzzin}, Adam and {Desprez}, Guillaume and {Asada}, Yoshihisa and {Abraham}, Roberto and {Brada{\\v{c}}}, Maru{\\v{s}}a and {Iyer}, Kartheik G. and {Martis}, Nicholas and {Mowla}, Lamiya and {Noirot}, Ga{\\\"e}l and {Sarrouh}, Ghassan T.~E. and {Sawicki}, Marcin and {Willott}, Chris and {Gould}, Katriona and {Grindlay}, Tess and {Matharu}, Jasleen and {Rihtar{\\v{s}}i{\\v{c}}}, Gregor},\n title = \"{An Extremely Compact, Low-mass Galaxy on its Way to Quiescence at z = 5.2}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Galaxies, Post-starburst galaxies, 573, 2176, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = jun,\n volume = {949},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L23},\n pages = {L23},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/acd457},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2303.11349},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...949L..23S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Weibel2025,\n author = {{Weibel}, Andrea and {de Graaff}, Anna and {Setton}, David J. and {Miller}, Tim B. and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Brammer}, Gabriel and {Lagos}, Claudia D.~P. and {Whitaker}, Katherine E. and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Baggen}, Josephine F.~W. and {Bezanson}, Rachel and {Boogaard}, Leindert A. and {Cleri}, Nikko J. and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Hirschmann}, Michaela and {Hviding}, Raphael E. and {Kuruvanthodi}, Adarsh and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Leja}, Joel and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {Matthee}, Jorryt and {McConachie}, Ian and {Naidu}, Rohan P. and {Roberts-Borsani}, Guido and {Schaerer}, Daniel and {Suess}, Katherine A. and {Valentino}, Francesco and {van Dokkum}, Pieter and {Wang}, Bingjie},\n title = \"{RUBIES Reveals a Massive Quiescent Galaxy at z = 7.3}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy evolution, Galaxy spectroscopy, Galaxy properties, Post-starburst galaxies, Quenched galaxies, Galaxy quenching, James Webb Space Telescope, Galaxy photometry, Spectral energy distribution, 594, 2171, 615, 2176, 2016, 2040, 2291, 611, 2129, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = apr,\n volume = {983},\n number = {1},\n eid = {11},\n pages = {11},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/adab7a},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2409.03829},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...983...11W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{FaucherGiguère2018,\n author = {{Faucher-Gigu{\\`e}re}, Claude-Andr{\\'e}},\n title = \"{A model for the origin of bursty star formation in galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {stars: formation, galaxies: dwarf, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: ISM, galaxies: starburst, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = jan,\n volume = {473},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3717-3731},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx2595},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1701.04824},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.3717F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ciesla2024,\n author = {{Ciesla}, L. and {Elbaz}, D. and {Ilbert}, O. and {Buat}, V. and {Magnelli}, B. and {Narayanan}, D. and {Daddi}, E. and {G{\\'o}mez-Guijarro}, C. and {Arango-Toro}, R.},\n title = \"{Identification of a transition from stochastic to secular star formation around z = 9 with JWST}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jun,\n volume = {686},\n eid = {A128},\n pages = {A128},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202348091},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2309.15720},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686A.128C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Looser2023,\n author = {{Looser}, Tobias J. and {D'Eugenio}, Francesco and {Maiolino}, Roberto and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Curti}, Mirko and {Arribas}, Santiago and {Baker}, William M. and {Baum}, Stefi and {Bonaventura}, Nina and {Boyett}, Kristan and {Bunker}, Andrew J. and {Carniani}, Stefano and {Charlot}, Stephane and {Chevallard}, Jacopo and {Curtis-Lake}, Emma and {Lola Danhaive}, A. and {Eisenstein}, Daniel J. and {de Graaff}, Anna and {Hainline}, Kevin and {Ji}, Zhiyuan and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Kumari}, Nimisha and {Nelson}, Erica and {Parlanti}, Eleonora and {Rix}, Hans-Walter and {Robertson}, Brant and {Del Pino}, Bruno Rodr{\\'\\i}guez and {Sandles}, Lester and {Scholtz}, Jan and {Smit}, Renske and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {{\\\"U}bler}, Hannah and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Willott}, Chris and {Witstok}, Joris},\n title = \"{JADES: Differing assembly histories of galaxies: Observational evidence for bursty star formation histories and (mini-)quenching in the first billion years of the Universe}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: starburst, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = may,\n volume = {697},\n eid = {A88},\n pages = {A88},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202347102},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2306.02470},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...697A..88L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Meyer2024,\n author = {{Meyer}, R.~A. and {Oesch}, P.~A. and {Giovinazzo}, E. and {Weibel}, A. and {Brammer}, G. and {Matthee}, J. and {Naidu}, R.~P. and {Bouwens}, R.~J. and {Chisholm}, J. and {Covelo-Paz}, A. and {Fudamoto}, Y. and {Maseda}, M. and {Nelson}, E. and {Shivaei}, I. and {Xiao}, M. and {Herard-Demanche}, T. and {Illingworth}, G.~D. and {Kerutt}, J. and {Kramarenko}, I. and {Labbe}, I. and {Leonova}, E. and {Magee}, D. and {Matharu}, J. and {Prieto Lyon}, G. and {Reddy}, N. and {Schaerer}, D. and {Shapley}, A. and {Stefanon}, M. and {Wozniak}, M.~A. and {Wuyts}, S.},\n title = \"{JWST FRESCO: a comprehensive census of H {\\ensuremath{\\beta}} + [O III] emitters at 6.8 < z < 9.0 in the GOODS fields}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = nov,\n volume = {535},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1067-1094},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae2353},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2405.05111},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.535.1067M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Endsley2024b,\n author = {{Endsley}, Ryan and {Chisholm}, John and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {Topping}, Michael W. and {Whitler}, Lily},\n title = \"{The Burstiness of Star Formation at z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 6: A Huge Diversity in the Recent Star Formation Histories of Very UV-faint Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {High-redshift galaxies, Galaxy formation, Galaxy evolution, 734, 595, 594, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = jul,\n volume = {987},\n number = {2},\n eid = {189},\n pages = {189},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/addc74},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2410.01905},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...987..189E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Endsley2024a,\n author = {{Endsley}, Ryan and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {Whitler}, Lily and {Topping}, Michael W. and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Robertson}, Brant and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Alberts}, Stacey and {Baker}, William M. and {Bhatawdekar}, Rachana and {Boyett}, Kristan and {Bunker}, Andrew J. and {Cameron}, Alex J. and {Carniani}, Stefano and {Charlot}, Stephane and {Chen}, Zuyi and {Chevallard}, Jacopo and {Curtis-Lake}, Emma and {Danhaive}, A. Lola and {Egami}, Eiichi and {Eisenstein}, Daniel J. and {Hainline}, Kevin and {Helton}, Jakob M. and {Ji}, Zhiyuan and {Looser}, Tobias J. and {Maiolino}, Roberto and {Nelson}, Erica and {Pusk{\\'a}s}, D{\\'a}vid and {Rieke}, George and {Rieke}, Marcia and {Rix}, Hans-Walter and {Sandles}, Lester and {Saxena}, Aayush and {Simmonds}, Charlotte and {Smit}, Renske and {Sun}, Fengwu and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Willmer}, Christopher N.~A. and {Willott}, Chris and {Witstok}, Joris},\n title = \"{The star-forming and ionizing properties of dwarf z 6-9 galaxies in JADES: insights on bursty star formation and ionized bubble growth}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = sep,\n volume = {533},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1111-1142},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae1857},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2306.05295},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533.1111E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Dressler2024,\n author = {{Dressler}, Alan and {Rieke}, Marcia and {Eisenstein}, Daniel and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {Burns}, Chris and {Bhatawdekar}, Rachana and {Bonaventura}, Nina and {Boyett}, Kristan and {Bunker}, Andrew J. and {Carniani}, Stefano and {Charlot}, Stephane and {Hausen}, Ryan and {Misselt}, Karl and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Willmer}, Christopher},\n title = \"{Building the First Galaxies{\\textemdash}Chapter 2. Starbursts Dominate the Star Formation Histories of 6 < z < 12 Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Early universe, 435, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = apr,\n volume = {964},\n number = {2},\n eid = {150},\n pages = {150},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad1923},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2306.02469},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...964..150D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Topping2022,\n author = {{Topping}, Michael W. and {Stark}, Daniel P. and {Endsley}, Ryan and {Bouwens}, Rychard J. and {Schouws}, Sander and {Smit}, Renske and {Stefanon}, Mauro and {Inami}, Hanae and {Bowler}, Rebecca A.~A. and {Oesch}, Pascal and {Gonzalez}, Valentino and {Dayal}, Pratika and {da Cunha}, Elisabete and {Algera}, Hiddo and {van der Werf}, Paul and {Pallottini}, Andrea and {Barrufet}, Laia and {Schneider}, Raffaella and {De Looze}, Ilse and {Sommovigo}, Laura and {Whitler}, Lily and {Graziani}, Luca and {Fudamoto}, Yoshinobu and {Ferrara}, Andrea},\n title = \"{The ALMA REBELS Survey: specific star formation rates in the reionization era}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = oct,\n volume = {516},\n number = {1},\n pages = {975-991},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac2291},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2203.07392},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516..975T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lovell2023b,\n author = {{Lovell}, Christopher C. and {Roper}, Will and {Vijayan}, Aswin P. and {Seeyave}, Louise and {Irodotou}, Dimitrios and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Conselice}, Christopher J. and {Fortuni}, Flaminia and {Kuusisto}, Jussi K. and {Merlin}, Emiliano and {Santini}, Paola and {Thomas}, Peter},\n title = \"{First light and reionisation epoch simulations (FLARES) - VIII. The emergence of passive galaxies at z {\\ensuremath{\\geq}} 5}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: abundances, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: photometry, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = nov,\n volume = {525},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5520-5539},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad2550},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2211.07540},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.5520L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Lovell2023a,\n author = {{Lovell}, Christopher C. and {Harrison}, Ian and {Harikane}, Yuichi and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Wilkins}, Stephen M.},\n title = \"{Extreme value statistics of the halo and stellar mass distributions at high redshift: are JWST results in tension with {\\ensuremath{\\Lambda}}CDM?}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: abundances, galaxies: haloes, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = jan,\n volume = {518},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2511-2520},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac3224},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2208.10479},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.2511L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Robertson2024,\n author = {{Robertson}, Brant and {Johnson}, Benjamin D. and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Eisenstein}, Daniel J. and {Hainline}, Kevin and {Arribas}, Santiago and {Baker}, William M. and {Bunker}, Andrew J. and {Carniani}, Stefano and {Cargile}, Phillip A. and {Carreira}, Courtney and {Charlot}, Stephane and {Chevallard}, Jacopo and {Curti}, Mirko and {Curtis-Lake}, Emma and {D'Eugenio}, Francesco and {Egami}, Eiichi and {Hausen}, Ryan and {Helton}, Jakob M. and {Jakobsen}, Peter and {Ji}, Zhiyuan and {Jones}, Gareth C. and {Maiolino}, Roberto and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {Nelson}, Erica and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Pusk{\\'a}s}, D{\\'a}vid and {Rieke}, Marcia and {Smit}, Renske and {Sun}, Fengwu and {{\\\"U}bler}, Hannah and {Whitler}, Lily and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Willmer}, Christopher N.~A. and {Willott}, Chris and {Witstok}, Joris},\n title = \"{Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic Star Formation Rate Density 300 Myr after the Big Bang}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Early universe, Galaxy formation, Galaxy evolution, High-redshift galaxies, Reionization, 435, 595, 594, 734, 1383, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = jul,\n volume = {970},\n number = {1},\n eid = {31},\n pages = {31},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad463d},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2312.10033},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...970...31R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Donnan2023,\n author = {{Donnan}, C.~T. and {McLeod}, D.~J. and {Dunlop}, J.~S. and {McLure}, R.~J. and {Carnall}, A.~C. and {Begley}, R. and {Cullen}, F. and {Hamadouche}, M.~L. and {Bowler}, R.~A.~A. and {Magee}, D. and {McCracken}, H.~J. and {Milvang-Jensen}, B. and {Moneti}, A. and {Targett}, T.},\n title = \"{The evolution of the galaxy UV luminosity function at redshifts z ≃ 8 - 15 from deep JWST and ground-based near-infrared imaging}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = feb,\n volume = {518},\n number = {4},\n pages = {6011-6040},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac3472},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2207.12356},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.6011D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ren2019,\n author = {{Ren}, Keven and {Trenti}, Michele and {Mason}, Charlotte A.},\n title = \"{The Brightest Galaxies at Cosmic Dawn from Scatter in the Galaxy Luminosity versus Halo Mass Relation}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = jun,\n volume = {878},\n number = {2},\n eid = {114},\n pages = {114},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab2117},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1905.04848},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...878..114R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Ventura2024,\n author = {{Ventura}, Emanuele M. and {Qin}, Yuxiang and {Balu}, Sreedhar and {Wyithe}, J. Stuart B.},\n title = \"{Semi-analytic modelling of Pop. III star formation and metallicity evolution - I. Impact on the UV luminosity functions at z = 9-16}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {stars: Population III, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2024,\n month = mar,\n volume = {529},\n number = {1},\n pages = {628-646},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae567},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2401.07396},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529..628V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hutter2025,\n author = {{Hutter}, Anne and {Cueto}, Elie R. and {Dayal}, Pratika and {Gottl{\\\"o}ber}, Stefan and {Trebitsch}, Maxime and {Yepes}, Gustavo},\n title = \"{ASTRAEUS: X. Indications of a top-heavy initial mass function in highly star-forming galaxies from JWST observations at z > 10}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, stars: luminosity function, mass function, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, intergalactic medium, dark ages, reionization, first stars, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2025,\n month = feb,\n volume = {694},\n eid = {A254},\n pages = {A254},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202452460},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2410.00730},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...694A.254H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Nikolic2024,\n author = {{Nikoli{\\'c}}, Ivan and {Mesinger}, Andrei and {Davies}, James E. and {Prelogovi{\\'c}}, David},\n title = \"{The importance of stochasticity in determining galaxy emissivities and UV LFs during cosmic dawn and reionization}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: high-redshift, intergalactic medium, diffuse radiation, dark ages, reionization, first stars, X-rays: diffuse background, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = dec,\n volume = {692},\n eid = {A142},\n pages = {A142},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202451213},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2406.15237},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...692A.142N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Feldmann2025,\n author = {{Feldmann}, Robert and {Boylan-Kolchin}, Michael and {Bullock}, James S. and {{\\c{C}}atmabacak}, Onur and {Faucher-Gigu{\\`e}re}, Claude-Andr{\\'e} and {Hayward}, Christopher C. and {Kere{\\v{s}}}, Du{\\v{s}}an and {Lazar}, Alexandres and {Liang}, Lichen and {Moreno}, Jorge and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Quataert}, Eliot and {Shen}, Xuejian and {Sun}, Guochao},\n title = \"{Elevated UV luminosity density at Cosmic Dawn explained by non-evolving, weakly mass-dependent star formation efficiency}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = jan,\n volume = {536},\n number = {1},\n pages = {988-1016},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stae2633},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2407.02674},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536..988F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Madau2000,\n author = {{Madau}, Piero and {Rees}, Martin J.},\n title = \"{The Earliest Luminous Sources and the Damping Wing of the Gunn-Peterson Trough}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Cosmology: Theory, Galaxies: Formation, Galaxies: Intergalactic Medium, Galaxies: Quasars: Absorption Lines, Radiative Transfer, Astrophysics},\n year = 2000,\n month = oct,\n volume = {542},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L69-L73},\n doi = {10.1086/312934},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0006271},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...542L..69M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{RobertsBorsani2016,\n author = {{Roberts-Borsani}, G.~W. and {Bouwens}, R.~J. and {Oesch}, P.~A. and {Labbe}, I. and {Smit}, R. and {Illingworth}, G.~D. and {van Dokkum}, P. and {Holden}, B. and {Gonzalez}, V. and {Stefanon}, M. and {Holwerda}, B. and {Wilkins}, S.},\n title = \"{z {\\ensuremath{\\gtrsim}} 7 Galaxies with Red Spitzer/IRAC [3.6]-[4.5] Colors in the Full CANDELS Data Set: The Brightest-Known Galaxies at z \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde 7-9 and a Probable Spectroscopic Confirmation at z = 7.48}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = jun,\n volume = {823},\n number = {2},\n eid = {143},\n pages = {143},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/143},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1506.00854},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823..143R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Finkelstein2022a,\n author = {{Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Bagley}, Micaela and {Song}, Mimi and {Larson}, Rebecca and {Papovich}, Casey and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Finkelstein}, Keely D. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Pirzkal}, Norbert and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron and {Behroozi}, Peter and {Ferguson}, Harry and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Grogin}, Norman and {Hathi}, Nimish and {Hutchison}, Taylor A. and {Jung}, Intae and {Kocevski}, Dale and {Kawinwanichakij}, Lalitwadee and {Rojas-Ruiz}, Sof{\\'\\i}a and {Ryan}, Russell and {Snyder}, Gregory F. and {Tacchella}, Sandro},\n title = \"{A Census of the Bright z = 8.5-11 Universe with the Hubble and Spitzer Space Telescopes in the CANDELS Fields}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Reionization, Galaxy evolution, Galaxy formation, 1383, 594, 595, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = mar,\n volume = {928},\n number = {1},\n eid = {52},\n pages = {52},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac3aed},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2106.13813},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...928...52F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Atek2015,\n author = {{Atek}, Hakim and {Richard}, Johan and {Kneib}, Jean-Paul and {Jauzac}, Mathilde and {Schaerer}, Daniel and {Clement}, Benjamin and {Limousin}, Marceau and {Jullo}, Eric and {Natarajan}, Priyamvada and {Egami}, Eiichi and {Ebeling}, Harald},\n title = \"{New Constraints on the Faint End of the UV Luminosity Function at z \\raisebox{-0.5ex}\\textasciitilde 7-8 Using the Gravitational Lensing of the Hubble Frontier Fields Cluster A2744}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, gravitational lensing: strong, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = feb,\n volume = {800},\n number = {1},\n eid = {18},\n pages = {18},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/18},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1409.0512},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...800...18A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Oesch2018,\n author = {{Oesch}, P.~A. and {Bouwens}, R.~J. and {Illingworth}, G.~D. and {Labb{\\'e}}, I. and {Stefanon}, M.},\n title = \"{The Dearth of z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 10 Galaxies in All HST Legacy Fields{\\textemdash}The Rapid Evolution of the Galaxy Population in the First 500 Myr}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: luminosity function, mass function, gravitational lensing: strong, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = mar,\n volume = {855},\n number = {2},\n eid = {105},\n pages = {105},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aab03f},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1710.11131},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...855..105O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Bouwens2015,\n author = {{Bouwens}, R.~J. and {Illingworth}, G.~D. and {Oesch}, P.~A. and {Trenti}, M. and {Labb{\\'e}}, I. and {Bradley}, L. and {Carollo}, M. and {van Dokkum}, P.~G. and {Gonzalez}, V. and {Holwerda}, B. and {Franx}, M. and {Spitler}, L. and {Smit}, R. and {Magee}, D.},\n title = \"{UV Luminosity Functions at Redshifts z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 4 to z {\\ensuremath{\\sim}} 10: 10,000 Galaxies from HST Legacy Fields}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = apr,\n volume = {803},\n number = {1},\n eid = {34},\n pages = {34},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/803/1/34},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1403.4295},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...803...34B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Steidel1996,\n author = {{Steidel}, Charles C. and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Pettini}, Max and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Adelberger}, Kurt L.},\n title = \"{Spectroscopic Confirmation of a Population of Normal Star-forming Galaxies at Redshifts Z > 3}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {COSMOLOGY: OBSERVATIONS, GALAXIES: FORMATION, GALAXIES: EVOLUTION, GALAXIES: DISTANCES AND REDSHIFTS, Astrophysics},\n year = 1996,\n month = may,\n volume = {462},\n pages = {L17},\n doi = {10.1086/310029},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9602024},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...462L..17S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Castellano2022,\n author = {{Castellano}, Marco and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Treu}, Tommaso and {Santini}, Paola and {Merlin}, Emiliano and {Leethochawalit}, Nicha and {Trenti}, Michele and {Vanzella}, Eros and {Mestric}, Uros and {Bonchi}, Andrea and {Belfiori}, Davide and {Nonino}, Mario and {Paris}, Diego and {Polenta}, Gianluca and {Roberts-Borsani}, Guido and {Boyett}, Kristan and {Brada{\\v{c}}}, Maru{\\v{s}}a and {Calabr{\\`o}}, Antonello and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Grillo}, Claudio and {Mascia}, Sara and {Mason}, Charlotte and {Mercurio}, Amata and {Morishita}, Takahiro and {Nanayakkara}, Themiya and {Pentericci}, Laura and {Rosati}, Piero and {Vulcani}, Benedetta and {Wang}, Xin and {Yang}, Lilan},\n title = \"{Early Results from GLASS-JWST. III. Galaxy Candidates at z 9-15}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Reionization, 1383, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = oct,\n volume = {938},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L15},\n pages = {L15},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/ac94d0},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2207.09436},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...938L..15C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Castellano2024,\n author = {{Castellano}, Marco and {Napolitano}, Lorenzo and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Roberts-Borsani}, Guido and {Treu}, Tommaso and {Vanzella}, Eros and {Zavala}, Jorge A. and {Arrabal Haro}, Pablo and {Calabr{\\`o}}, Antonello and {Llerena}, Mario and {Mascia}, Sara and {Merlin}, Emiliano and {Paris}, Diego and {Pentericci}, Laura and {Santini}, Paola and {Bakx}, Tom J.~L.~C. and {Bergamini}, Pietro and {Cupani}, Guido and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Filippenko}, Alexei V. and {Glazebrook}, Karl and {Grillo}, Claudio and {Kelly}, Patrick L. and {Malkan}, Matthew A. and {Mason}, Charlotte A. and {Morishita}, Takahiro and {Nanayakkara}, Themiya and {Rosati}, Piero and {Sani}, Eleonora and {Wang}, Xin and {Yoon}, Ilsang},\n title = \"{JWST NIRSpec Spectroscopy of the Remarkable Bright Galaxy GHZ2/GLASS-z12 at Redshift 12.34}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {High-redshift galaxies, Primordial galaxies, 734, 1293, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = sep,\n volume = {972},\n number = {2},\n eid = {143},\n pages = {143},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2403.10238},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...972..143C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hainline2020,\n author = {{Hainline}, Kevin N. and {Hviding}, Raphael E. and {Rieke}, Marcia and {Shivaei}, Irene and {Endsley}, Ryan and {Curtis-Lake}, Emma and {Smit}, Renske and {Williams}, Christina C. and {Alberts}, Stacey and {K Boyett}, Kristan N. and {Bunker}, Andrew J. and {Egami}, Eiichi and {Maseda}, Michael V. and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Willmer}, Christopher N.~A.},\n title = \"{Simulating JWST/NIRCam Color Selection of High-redshift Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {High-redshift galaxies, Galaxy colors, 734, 586, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = apr,\n volume = {892},\n number = {2},\n eid = {125},\n pages = {125},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab7dc3},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2003.04326},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...892..125H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{ArrabalHaro2023,\n author = {{Arrabal Haro}, Pablo and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Donnan}, Callum T. and {Burgarella}, Denis and {Carnall}, Adam C. and {Cullen}, Fergus and {Dunlop}, James S. and {Fern{\\'a}ndez}, Vital and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Jung}, Intae and {Krips}, Melanie and {Larson}, Rebecca L. and {Papovich}, Casey and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Amor{\\'\\i}n}, Ricardo O. and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Buat}, V{\\'e}ronique and {Casey}, Caitlin M. and {Chworowsky}, Katherine and {Cohen}, Seth H. and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Huertas-Company}, Marc and {Hutchison}, Taylor A. and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {McLeod}, Derek J. and {McLure}, Ross J. and {Pirzkal}, Norbert and {Seill{\\'e}}, Lise-Marie and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {Weiner}, Benjamin J. and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Zavala}, Jorge A.},\n title = \"{Confirmation and refutation of very luminous galaxies in the early Universe}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = oct,\n volume = {622},\n number = {7984},\n pages = {707-711},\n doi = {10.1038/s41586-023-06521-7},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2303.15431},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.622..707A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Tomassetti2016,\n author = {{Tomassetti}, Matteo and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Mandelker}, Nir and {Ceverino}, Daniel and {Lapiner}, Sharon and {Faber}, Sandra and {Kneller}, Omer and {Primack}, Joel and {Sai}, Tanmayi},\n title = \"{Evolution of galaxy shapes from prolate to oblate through compaction events}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: spiral, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = jun,\n volume = {458},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4477-4497},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw606},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1512.06268},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.4477T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Pandya2024,\n author = {{Pandya}, Viraj and {Zhang}, Haowen and {Huertas-Company}, Marc and {Iyer}, Kartheik G. and {McGrath}, Elizabeth and {Barro}, Guillermo and {Finkelstein}, Steven L. and {K{\\\"u}mmel}, Martin and {Hartley}, William G. and {Ferguson}, Henry C. and {Kartaltepe}, Jeyhan S. and {Primack}, Joel and {Dekel}, Avishai and {Faber}, Sandra M. and {Koo}, David C. and {Bryan}, Greg L. and {Somerville}, Rachel S. and {Amor{\\'\\i}n}, Ricardo O. and {Arrabal Haro}, Pablo and {Bagley}, Micaela B. and {Bell}, Eric F. and {Bertin}, Emmanuel and {Costantin}, Luca and {Dav{\\'e}}, Romeel and {Dickinson}, Mark and {Feldmann}, Robert and {Fontana}, Adriano and {Gavazzi}, Raphael and {Giavalisco}, Mauro and {Grazian}, Andrea and {Grogin}, Norman A. and {Guo}, Yuchen and {Hahn}, ChangHoon and {Holwerda}, Benne W. and {Kewley}, Lisa J. and {Kirkpatrick}, Allison and {Kocevski}, Dale D. and {Koekemoer}, Anton M. and {Lotz}, Jennifer M. and {Lucas}, Ray A. and {Papovich}, Casey and {Pentericci}, Laura and {P{\\'e}rez-Gonz{\\'a}lez}, Pablo G. and {Pirzkal}, Nor and {Ravindranath}, Swara and {Rose}, Caitlin and {Schefer}, Marc and {Simons}, Raymond C. and {Straughn}, Amber N. and {Tacchella}, Sandro and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {de la Vega}, Alexander and {Wilkins}, Stephen M. and {Wuyts}, Stijn and {Yang}, Guang and {Yung}, L.~Y. Aaron},\n title = \"{Galaxies Going Bananas: Inferring the 3D Geometry of High-redshift Galaxies with JWST-CEERS}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {High-redshift galaxies, Galaxy classification systems, Dwarf galaxies, Galaxy structure, James Webb Space Telescope, Galaxy disks, Galaxy spheroids, Galaxy radii, Galaxy masses, 734, 582, 416, 622, 2291, 589, 2032, 617, 607, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = mar,\n volume = {963},\n number = {1},\n eid = {54},\n pages = {54},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad1a13},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2310.15232},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...963...54P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Hashimoto2018,\n author = {{Hashimoto}, Takuya and {Laporte}, Nicolas and {Mawatari}, Ken and {Ellis}, Richard S. and {Inoue}, Akio K. and {Zackrisson}, Erik and {Roberts-Borsani}, Guido and {Zheng}, Wei and {Tamura}, Yoichi and {Bauer}, Franz E. and {Fletcher}, Thomas and {Harikane}, Yuichi and {Hatsukade}, Bunyo and {Hayatsu}, Natsuki H. and {Matsuda}, Yuichi and {Matsuo}, Hiroshi and {Okamoto}, Takashi and {Ouchi}, Masami and {Pell{\\'o}}, Roser and {Rydberg}, Claes-Erik and {Shimizu}, Ikkoh and {Taniguchi}, Yoshiaki and {Umehata}, Hideki and {Yoshida}, Naoki},\n title = \"{The onset of star formation 250 million years after the Big Bang}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = may,\n volume = {557},\n number = {7705},\n pages = {392-395},\n doi = {10.1038/s41586-018-0117-z},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1805.05966},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.557..392H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Zheng2012,\n author = {{Zheng}, Wei and {Postman}, Marc and {Zitrin}, Adi and {Moustakas}, John and {Shu}, Xinwen and {Jouvel}, Stephanie and {H{\\o}st}, Ole and {Molino}, Alberto and {Bradley}, Larry and {Coe}, Dan and {Moustakas}, Leonidas A. and {Carrasco}, Mauricio and {Ford}, Holland and {Ben{\\'\\i}tez}, Narciso and {Lauer}, Tod R. and {Seitz}, Stella and {Bouwens}, Rychard and {Koekemoer}, Anton and {Medezinski}, Elinor and {Bartelmann}, Matthias and {Broadhurst}, Tom and {Donahue}, Megan and {Grillo}, Claudio and {Infante}, Leopoldo and {Jha}, Saurabh W. and {Kelson}, Daniel D. and {Lahav}, Ofer and {Lemze}, Doron and {Melchior}, Peter and {Meneghetti}, Massimo and {Merten}, Julian and {Nonino}, Mario and {Ogaz}, Sara and {Rosati}, Piero and {Umetsu}, Keiichi and {van der Wel}, Arjen},\n title = \"{A magnified young galaxy from about 500 million years after the Big Bang}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = sep,\n volume = {489},\n number = {7416},\n pages = {406-408},\n doi = {10.1038/nature11446},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1204.2305},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012Natur.489..406Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Laporte2021,\n author = {{Laporte}, N. and {Meyer}, R.~A. and {Ellis}, R.~S. and {Robertson}, B.~E. and {Chisholm}, J. and {Roberts-Borsani}, G.~W.},\n title = \"{Probing cosmic dawn: Ages and star formation histories of candidate z {\\ensuremath{\\geq}} 9 galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, galaxies: stellar content, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2021,\n month = aug,\n volume = {505},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3336-3346},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stab1239},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2104.08168},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.3336L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Kokorev2025,\n author = {{Kokorev}, Vasily and {Atek}, Hakim and {Chisholm}, John and {Endsley}, Ryan and {Chemerynska}, Iryna and {Mu{\\~n}oz}, Julian B. and {Furtak}, Lukas J. and {Pan}, Richard and {Berg}, Danielle and {Fujimoto}, Seiji and {Oesch}, Pascal A. and {Weibel}, Andrea and {Adamo}, Angela and {Blaizot}, Jeremy and {Bouwens}, Rychard and {Dessauges-Zavadsky}, Miroslava and {Khullar}, Gourav and {Korber}, Damien and {Goovaerts}, Ilias and {Jecmen}, Michelle and {Labb{\\'e}}, Ivo and {Leclercq}, Floriane and {Marques-Chaves}, Rui and {Mason}, Charlotte and {McQuinn}, Kristen B.~W. and {Naidu}, Rohan and {Natarajan}, Priyamvada and {Nelson}, Erica and {Rosdahl}, Joki and {Saldana-Lopez}, Alberto and {Schaerer}, Daniel and {Trebitsch}, Maxime and {Volonteri}, Marta and {Zitrin}, Adi},\n title = \"{A Glimpse of the New Redshift Frontier through AS1063}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {High-redshift galaxies, Early universe, 734, 435, Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = apr,\n volume = {983},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L22},\n pages = {L22},\n doi = {10.3847/2041-8213/adc458},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2411.13640},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...983L..22K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{Oesch2016,\n author = {{Oesch}, P.~A. and {Brammer}, G. and {van Dokkum}, P.~G. and {Illingworth}, G.~D. and {Bouwens}, R.~J. and {Labb{\\'e}}, I. and {Franx}, M. and {Momcheva}, I. and {Ashby}, M.~L.~N. and {Fazio}, G.~G. and {Gonzalez}, V. and {Holden}, B. and {Magee}, D. and {Skelton}, R.~E. and {Smit}, R. and {Spitler}, L.~R. and {Trenti}, M. and {Willner}, S.~P.},\n title = \"{A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at z=11.1 Measured with Hubble Space Telescope Grism Spectroscopy}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dark ages, reionization, first stars, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: high-redshift, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = mar,\n volume = {819},\n number = {2},\n eid = {129},\n pages = {129},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/129},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1603.00461},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...819..129O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n================================================\nFILE: shortcuts.sty\n================================================\n% ===============================================================\n% SHORTCUTS, DEFINITIONS etc\n% ===============================================================\n\n\\ProvidesPackage{shortcuts}\n\n%%% Definitions of packages, simulations etc\n%%%----------------------------------------------\n\\newcommand{\\CIGALE}{\\texttt{CIGALE}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\cigale}{\\texttt{CIGALE}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\LePhare}{\\texttt{LePHARE}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\LePHARE}{\\texttt{LePHARE}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\SourceExtractorPP}{\\texttt{SourceXtractor++}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\treecorr}{\\texttt{TreeCorr}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\SEPP}{\\texttt{SE++}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\SEcl}{\\texttt{SE}-classic\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\SExtractor}{\\texttt{SExtractor}\\xspace}\n\n\\newcommand{\\HorizonAGN}{\\textsc{Horizon}-AGN\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\UniverseMachine}{\\textsc{UniverseMachine}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\UM}{\\textsc{UM}\\xspace} %shortcut for UniverseMachine\n\n\\newcommand{\\JWST}{JWST\\xspace}%\\newcommand{\\JWST}{\\textit{JWST}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\HST}{HST\\xspace}%\\newcommand{\\HST}{\\textit{HST}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\Spitzer}{\\textit{Spitzer}\\xspace}\n\n%%% Units\n%%%----------------------------------------------\n\\newcommand{\\angstrom}{$\\text{\\AA}$\\xspace} %\\DeclareSIUnit\\angstrom{\\text {Å}}\n\\newcommand{\\magAB}{\\ensuremath{\\mathrm{mag}}\\xspace} %\\newcommand{\\magAB}{\\ensuremath{\\mathrm{mag}_{\\mathrm{AB}}\\xspace}}\n\\DeclareMathOperator{\\arcsecond}{arcsec}\n%\\newcommand{\\arcsec}{\\ensuremath{^{\\prime\\prime}}\\xspace}\n\\DeclareMathOperator{\\arcminute}{arcmin}\n%\\newcommand{\\arcmin}{\\ensuremath{^{\\prime}}\\xspace}\n\\DeclareSIUnit \\parsec {pc}\n\n%%% Astrophysical symbols\n%%%----------------------------------------------\n\\newcommand{\\Msun}{\\ensuremath{M_{\\rm{\\odot}}}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\Mh}{\\ensuremath{M_{\\rm h}}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\MUV}{\\ensuremath{M_{\\rm UV}}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\logSM}{\\ensuremath{\\log(M_\\star/M_\\odot)}\\xspace}\n\n\\newcommand\\varcal[1]{\\text{\\usefont{OMS}{cmsy}{m}{n}#1}}\n\n%%% Custom Colors\n%%%----------------------------------------------\n\\definecolor{LPdarkgreen}{RGB}{16,117,16}\n\\definecolor{LPlightgreen}{RGB}{170,200,170}\n\\definecolor{LPLIGHTGREEN}{RGB}{170,200,170}\n\\definecolor{LPdarkorchid}{RGB}{103,35,137}\n\\definecolor{LPgrey}{RGB}{210,210,210}\n\\definecolor{LPlightgrey}{RGB}{240,240,240}\n\n%%% Acronyms\n%%%----------------------------------------------\n%\\newacronym{JWST}{JWST}{\\textit{James Webb Space Telescope}}\n%\\newacronym{HST}{HST}{\\textit{Hubble Space Telescope}}\n%\\newacronym{HOD}{HOD}{Halo Occupation Distribution}\n\n%%% Comments, text commands\n%%%----------------------------------------------\n\\newcommand{\\LP}[1]{{\\color{WildStrawberry}{LP: \\textbf\\normalsize{#1}}}}\n\\newcommand{\\deepen}[0]{{\\color{YellowGreen}{...need to complete...}}}\n\\newcommand{\\XX}[0]{{\\color{Turquoise}{XX}}}\n\\newcommand{\\needref}[0]{{\\color{YellowOrange}{[need ref]}}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\Leftfig}[0]{\\textit{\\textbf{Left:}}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\Rightfig}[0]{\\textit{\\textbf{Right:}}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\Topfig}[0]{\\textit{\\textbf{Top:}}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\Bottomfig}[0]{\\textit{\\textbf{Bottom:}}\\xspace}\n\n\\newcommand{\\eg}[0]{e.g.\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\ie}[0]{i.e.\\xspace}\n\n%%% Aliases for refs\n%%%----------------------------------------------\n\\newcommand{\\sref}[1]{\\S~\\ref{#1}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\reffig}[1]{Fig.~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\reffigure}[1]{Figure~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\refeq}[1]{Eq.~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\refequation}[1]{Equation~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\refsec}[1]{Sect.~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\refsection}[1]{Section~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n%\\newcommand{\\refsubsec}[1]{Subsec.~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n%\\newcommand{\\refsubsection}[1]{Subsection~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n%\\newcommand{\\refsubsubsec}[1]{Sub-subsec.~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n%\\newcommand{\\refsubsubsection}[1]{Sub-subsection~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\refsubsec}[1]{Sect.~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\refsubsection}[1]{Section~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\refsubsubsec}[1]{Sect.~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\refsubsubsection}[1]{Section~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\refchap}[1]{Chap.~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\refchapter}[1]{Chapter~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\refpart}[1]{Part~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\reftab}[1]{Tab.~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\reftable}[1]{Table~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\refapp}[1]{Appendix~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\\newcommand{\\refappendix}[1]{Appendix~\\ref{#1}\\xspace}\n\n%%% Citation alias\n%%%----------------------------------------------\n\\defcitealias{Paquereau2025}{P25}\n\n%%% Papers in prep\n%%%----------------------------------------------\n\\newcommand{\\citeinprep}[1]{\\textcolor{black}{#1 et al. (in prep)}}\n\\newcommand{\\citeinprepA}[1]{\\textcolor{black}{#1 et al. (in prep, a)}}\n\\newcommand{\\citeinprepB}[1]{\\textcolor{black}{#1 et al. (in prep, b)}}\n\\newcommand{\\citepinprep}[1]{(\\textcolor{black}{#1 et al., in prep})}\n\\newcommand{\\citepinprepA}[1]{(\\textcolor{black}{#1 et al., in prep a})}\n\\newcommand{\\citepinprepB}[1]{(\\textcolor{black}{#1 et al., in prep b})}\n\\newcommand{\\citealtinprep}[1]{\\textcolor{black}{#1 et al., in prep}}\n\n%%% Commands for referee report\n%%%----------------------------------------------\n\\newcommand{\\ra}[1]{\n \\ifmmode\n \\textcolor{Green}{\\bm{#1}}\n \\else\n \\textbf{\\textcolor{Green}{#1}}\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand{\\rr}[1]{\n \\xspace\n \\ifmmode\n \\textcolor{BrickRed}{\\cancel{#1}}\n \\else\n \\textcolor{BrickRed}{\\sout{#1}}\n \\fi\n \\xspace\n}\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091179,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31979"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31979"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Gabi Pragier"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Gabi Pragier, Matan Karklinsky, David Ungarish, Avi Ben-Cohen"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Planar-SfM: Camera Pose Estimation via Homography Graph Embeddings"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"Accepted at ICPR 2026"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.CV"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Structure from Motion (SfM) systems traditionally struggle with planar scenes, where standard epipolar geometry-based methods become degenerate. Rather than viewing planar surfaces as a limitation, we propose a unified framework that leverages them as a source of geometric constraints. Our key insight is that each planar surface visible across multiple views provides an independent estimate of relative camera poses through homography decomposition. By aggregating estimates from multiple planes or even from a single dominant plane we achieve robust pose recovery in scenarios where traditional methods fail. We introduce a novel graph-based approach that constructs a pose-graph from homography estimates and employs spectral embedding to identify and filter unreliable edges. Our method maps homography-based pose estimates onto the real line based on their geometric and visual consistency, enabling efficient extraction of a maximally consistent spanning tree for pose recovery. This approach naturally handles both highly planar scenes, such as indoor sports arenas, and general $3$D environments. We demonstrate superior performance on basketball court imagery where existing methods struggle, while matching or exceeding state-of-the-art results on unconstrained outdoor scenes from the IMC Phototourism benchmark."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:18:27 GMT"},{"version":"v2","created":"Wed, 01 Jul 2026 07:10:37 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:18:27 GMT\"\n },\n {\n \"version\": \"v2\",\n \"created\": \"Wed, 01 Jul 2026 07:10:37 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-02"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Pragier","Gabi",""],["Karklinsky","Matan",""],["Ungarish","David",""],["Ben-Cohen","Avi",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Pragier\",\n \"Gabi\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Karklinsky\",\n \"Matan\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Ungarish\",\n \"David\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Ben-Cohen\",\n \"Avi\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: llncs.cls\n================================================\n% LLNCS DOCUMENT CLASS -- version 2.22 (05-Sep-2022)\n% Springer Verlag LaTeX2e support for Lecture Notes in Computer Science\n%\n%%\n%% \\CharacterTable\n%% {Upper-case \\A\\B\\C\\D\\E\\F\\G\\H\\I\\J\\K\\L\\M\\N\\O\\P\\Q\\R\\S\\T\\U\\V\\W\\X\\Y\\Z\n%% Lower-case \\a\\b\\c\\d\\e\\f\\g\\h\\i\\j\\k\\l\\m\\n\\o\\p\\q\\r\\s\\t\\u\\v\\w\\x\\y\\z\n%% Digits \\0\\1\\2\\3\\4\\5\\6\\7\\8\\9\n%% Exclamation \\! Double quote \\\" Hash (number) \\#\n%% Dollar \\$ Percent \\% Ampersand \\&\n%% Acute accent \\' Left paren \\( Right paren \\)\n%% Asterisk \\* Plus \\+ Comma \\,\n%% Minus \\- Point \\. Solidus \\/\n%% Colon \\: Semicolon \\; Less than \\<\n%% Equals \\= Greater than \\> Question mark \\?\n%% Commercial at \\@ Left bracket \\[ Backslash \\\\\n%% Right bracket \\] Circumflex \\^ Underscore \\_\n%% Grave accent \\` Left brace \\{ Vertical bar \\|\n%% Right brace \\} Tilde \\~}\n%%\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1995/12/01]\n\\ProvidesClass{llncs}[2022/09/05 v2.22\n^^J LaTeX document class for Lecture Notes in Computer Science]\n% Options\n\\let\\if@envcntreset\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{envcountreset}{\\let\\if@envcntreset\\iftrue}\n\\DeclareOption{citeauthoryear}{\\let\\citeauthoryear=Y}\n\\DeclareOption{oribibl}{\\let\\oribibl=Y}\n\\let\\if@custvec\\iftrue\n\\DeclareOption{orivec}{\\let\\if@custvec\\iffalse}\n\\let\\if@envcntsame\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{envcountsame}{\\let\\if@envcntsame\\iftrue}\n\\let\\if@envcntsect\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{envcountsect}{\\let\\if@envcntsect\\iftrue}\n\\let\\if@runhead\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{runningheads}{\\let\\if@runhead\\iftrue}\n\n\\let\\if@openright\\iftrue\n\\let\\if@openbib\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{openbib}{\\let\\if@openbib\\iftrue}\n\n% languages\n\\let\\switcht@@therlang\\relax\n\\def\\ds@deutsch{\\def\\switcht@@therlang{\\switcht@deutsch}}\n\\def\\ds@francais{\\def\\switcht@@therlang{\\switcht@francais}}\n\n\\DeclareOption*{\\PassOptionsToClass{\\CurrentOption}{article}}\n\n\\ProcessOptions\n\n\\LoadClass[twoside]{article}\n\\RequirePackage{multicol} % needed for the list of participants, index\n\\RequirePackage{aliascnt}\n\n\\setlength{\\textwidth}{12.2cm}\n\\setlength{\\textheight}{19.3cm}\n\\renewcommand\\@pnumwidth{2em}\n\\renewcommand\\@tocrmarg{3.5em}\n%\n\\def\\@dottedtocline#1#2#3#4#5{%\n \\ifnum #1>\\c@tocdepth \\else\n \\vskip \\z@ \\@plus.2\\p@\n {\\leftskip #2\\relax \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg \\advance\\rightskip by 0pt plus 2cm\n \\parfillskip -\\rightskip \\pretolerance=10000\n \\parindent #2\\relax\\@afterindenttrue\n \\interlinepenalty\\@M\n \\leavevmode\n \\@tempdima #3\\relax\n \\advance\\leftskip \\@tempdima \\null\\nobreak\\hskip -\\leftskip\n {#4}\\nobreak\n \\leaders\\hbox{$\\m@th\n \\mkern \\@dotsep mu\\hbox{.}\\mkern \\@dotsep\n mu$}\\hfill\n \\nobreak\n \\hb@xt@\\@pnumwidth{\\hfil\\normalfont \\normalcolor #5}%\n \\par}%\n \\fi}\n%\n\\def\\switcht@albion{%\n\\def\\abstractname{Abstract.}\n\\def\\ackname{Acknowledgement.}\n\\def\\andname{and}\n\\def\\lastandname{\\unskip, and}\n\\def\\appendixname{Appendix}\n\\def\\chaptername{Chapter}\n\\def\\claimname{Claim}\n\\def\\conjecturename{Conjecture}\n\\def\\contentsname{Table of Contents}\n\\def\\corollaryname{Corollary}\n\\def\\definitionname{Definition}\n\\def\\examplename{Example}\n\\def\\exercisename{Exercise}\n\\def\\figurename{Fig.}\n\\def\\keywordname{{\\bf Keywords:}}\n\\def\\indexname{Index}\n\\def\\lemmaname{Lemma}\n\\def\\contriblistname{List of Contributors}\n\\def\\listfigurename{List of Figures}\n\\def\\listtablename{List of Tables}\n\\def\\mailname{{\\it Correspondence to\\/}:}\n\\def\\noteaddname{Note added in proof}\n\\def\\notename{Note}\n\\def\\partname{Part}\n\\def\\problemname{Problem}\n\\def\\proofname{Proof}\n\\def\\propertyname{Property}\n\\def\\propositionname{Proposition}\n\\def\\questionname{Question}\n\\def\\remarkname{Remark}\n\\def\\seename{see}\n\\def\\solutionname{Solution}\n\\def\\subclassname{{\\it Subject Classifications\\/}:}\n\\def\\tablename{Table}\n\\def\\theoremname{Theorem}}\n\\switcht@albion\n% Names of theorem like environments are already defined\n% but must be translated if another language is chosen\n%\n% French section\n\\def\\switcht@francais{%\\typeout{On parle francais.}%\n \\def\\abstractname{R\\'esum\\'e.}%\n \\def\\ackname{Remerciements.}%\n \\def\\andname{et}%\n \\def\\lastandname{ et}%\n \\def\\appendixname{Appendice}%\n \\def\\chaptername{Chapitre}%\n \\def\\claimname{Pr\\'etention}%\n \\def\\conjecturename{Hypoth\\`ese}%\n \\def\\contentsname{Table des mati\\`eres}%\n \\def\\corollaryname{Corollaire}%\n \\def\\definitionname{D\\'efinition}%\n \\def\\examplename{Exemple}%\n \\def\\exercisename{Exercice}%\n \\def\\figurename{Fig.}%\n \\def\\keywordname{{\\bf Mots-cl\\'e:}}%\n \\def\\indexname{Index}%\n \\def\\lemmaname{Lemme}%\n \\def\\contriblistname{Liste des contributeurs}%\n \\def\\listfigurename{Liste des figures}%\n \\def\\listtablename{Liste des tables}%\n \\def\\mailname{{\\it Correspondence to\\/}:}%\n \\def\\noteaddname{Note ajout\\'ee \\`a l'\\'epreuve}%\n \\def\\notename{Remarque}%\n \\def\\partname{Partie}%\n \\def\\problemname{Probl\\`eme}%\n \\def\\proofname{Preuve}%\n \\def\\propertyname{Caract\\'eristique}%\n%\\def\\propositionname{Proposition}%\n \\def\\questionname{Question}%\n \\def\\remarkname{Remarque}%\n \\def\\seename{voir}%\n \\def\\solutionname{Solution}%\n \\def\\subclassname{{\\it Subject Classifications\\/}:}%\n \\def\\tablename{Tableau}%\n \\def\\theoremname{Th\\'eor\\`eme}%\n}\n%\n% German section\n\\def\\switcht@deutsch{%\\typeout{Man spricht deutsch.}%\n \\def\\abstractname{Zusammenfassung.}%\n \\def\\ackname{Danksagung.}%\n \\def\\andname{und}%\n \\def\\lastandname{ und}%\n \\def\\appendixname{Anhang}%\n \\def\\chaptername{Kapitel}%\n \\def\\claimname{Behauptung}%\n \\def\\conjecturename{Hypothese}%\n \\def\\contentsname{Inhaltsverzeichnis}%\n \\def\\corollaryname{Korollar}%\n%\\def\\definitionname{Definition}%\n \\def\\examplename{Beispiel}%\n \\def\\exercisename{\\\"Ubung}%\n \\def\\figurename{Abb.}%\n \\def\\keywordname{{\\bf Schl\\\"usselw\\\"orter:}}%\n \\def\\indexname{Index}%\n%\\def\\lemmaname{Lemma}%\n \\def\\contriblistname{Mitarbeiter}%\n \\def\\listfigurename{Abbildungsverzeichnis}%\n \\def\\listtablename{Tabellenverzeichnis}%\n \\def\\mailname{{\\it Correspondence to\\/}:}%\n \\def\\noteaddname{Nachtrag}%\n \\def\\notename{Anmerkung}%\n \\def\\partname{Teil}%\n%\\def\\problemname{Problem}%\n \\def\\proofname{Beweis}%\n \\def\\propertyname{Eigenschaft}%\n%\\def\\propositionname{Proposition}%\n \\def\\questionname{Frage}%\n \\def\\remarkname{Anmerkung}%\n \\def\\seename{siehe}%\n \\def\\solutionname{L\\\"osung}%\n \\def\\subclassname{{\\it Subject Classifications\\/}:}%\n \\def\\tablename{Tabelle}%\n%\\def\\theoremname{Theorem}%\n}\n\n% Ragged bottom for the actual page\n\\def\\thisbottomragged{\\def\\@textbottom{\\vskip\\z@ plus.0001fil\n\\global\\let\\@textbottom\\relax}}\n\n\\renewcommand\\small{%\n \\@setfontsize\\small\\@ixpt{11}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 8.5\\p@ \\@plus3\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus2\\p@\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 4\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus2\\p@\n \\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\parsep 0\\p@ \\@plus1\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\topsep 8\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\itemsep0\\p@}%\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n}\n\n\\frenchspacing\n\\widowpenalty=10000\n\\clubpenalty=10000\n\n\\setlength\\oddsidemargin {63\\p@}\n\\setlength\\evensidemargin {63\\p@}\n\\setlength\\marginparwidth {90\\p@}\n\n\\setlength\\headsep {16\\p@}\n\n\\setlength\\footnotesep{7.7\\p@}\n\\setlength\\textfloatsep{8mm\\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}\n\\setlength\\intextsep {8mm\\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\n\\setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}\n\n\\newcounter {chapter}\n\\renewcommand\\thechapter {\\@arabic\\c@chapter}\n\n\\newif\\if@mainmatter \\@mainmattertrue\n\\newcommand\\frontmatter{\\cleardoublepage\n \\@mainmatterfalse\\pagenumbering{Roman}}\n\\newcommand\\mainmatter{\\cleardoublepage\n \\@mainmattertrue\\pagenumbering{arabic}}\n\\newcommand\\backmatter{\\if@openright\\cleardoublepage\\else\\clearpage\\fi\n \\@mainmatterfalse}\n\n\\renewcommand\\part{\\cleardoublepage\n \\thispagestyle{empty}%\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\onecolumn\n \\@tempswatrue\n \\else\n \\@tempswafalse\n \\fi\n \\null\\vfil\n \\secdef\\@part\\@spart}\n\n\\def\\@part[#1]#2{%\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >-2\\relax\n \\refstepcounter{part}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{part}{\\thepart\\hspace{1em}#1}%\n \\else\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{part}{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\markboth{}{}%\n {\\centering\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M\n \\normalfont\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >-2\\relax\n \\huge\\bfseries \\partname~\\thepart\n \\par\n \\vskip 20\\p@\n \\fi\n \\Huge \\bfseries #2\\par}%\n \\@endpart}\n\\def\\@spart#1{%\n {\\centering\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M\n \\normalfont\n \\Huge \\bfseries #1\\par}%\n \\@endpart}\n\\def\\@endpart{\\vfil\\newpage\n \\if@twoside\n \\null\n \\thispagestyle{empty}%\n \\newpage\n \\fi\n \\if@tempswa\n \\twocolumn\n \\fi}\n\n\\newcommand\\chapter{\\clearpage\n \\thispagestyle{empty}%\n \\global\\@topnum\\z@\n \\@afterindentfalse\n \\secdef\\@chapter\\@schapter}\n\\def\\@chapter[#1]#2{\\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\m@ne\n \\if@mainmatter\n \\refstepcounter{chapter}%\n \\typeout{\\@chapapp\\space\\thechapter.}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}%\n {\\protect\\numberline{\\thechapter}#1}%\n \\else\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\chaptermark{#1}%\n \\addtocontents{lof}{\\protect\\addvspace{10\\p@}}%\n \\addtocontents{lot}{\\protect\\addvspace{10\\p@}}%\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@topnewpage[\\@makechapterhead{#2}]%\n \\else\n \\@makechapterhead{#2}%\n \\@afterheading\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@makechapterhead#1{%\n% \\vspace*{50\\p@}%\n {\\centering\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\m@ne\n \\if@mainmatter\n \\large\\bfseries \\@chapapp{} \\thechapter\n \\par\\nobreak\n \\vskip 20\\p@\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\interlinepenalty\\@M\n \\Large \\bfseries #1\\par\\nobreak\n \\vskip 40\\p@\n }}\n\\def\\@schapter#1{\\if@twocolumn\n \\@topnewpage[\\@makeschapterhead{#1}]%\n \\else\n \\@makeschapterhead{#1}%\n \\@afterheading\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@makeschapterhead#1{%\n% \\vspace*{50\\p@}%\n {\\centering\n \\normalfont\n \\interlinepenalty\\@M\n \\Large \\bfseries #1\\par\\nobreak\n \\vskip 40\\p@\n }}\n\n\\renewcommand\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}%\n {-18\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {12\\p@ \\@plus 4\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}%\n {\\normalfont\\large\\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\rightskip=\\z@ \\@plus 8em\\pretolerance=10000 }}\n\\renewcommand\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}%\n {-18\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {8\\p@ \\@plus 4\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\rightskip=\\z@ \\@plus 8em\\pretolerance=10000 }}\n\\renewcommand\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}%\n {-18\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {-0.5em \\@plus -0.22em \\@minus -0.1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries\\boldmath}}\n\\renewcommand\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}%\n {-12\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {-0.5em \\@plus -0.22em \\@minus -0.1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}\n\\renewcommand\\subparagraph[1]{\\typeout{LLNCS warning: You should not use\n \\string\\subparagraph\\space with this class}\\vskip0.5cm\nYou should not use \\verb|\\subparagraph| with this class.\\vskip0.5cm}\n\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Gamma}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"00}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Delta}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"01}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Theta}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"02}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Lambda}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"03}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Xi}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"04}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Pi}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"05}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Sigma}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"06}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Upsilon}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"07}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Phi}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"08}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Psi}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"09}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Omega}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"0A}\n\n\\let\\footnotesize\\small\n\n\\if@custvec\n\\DeclareRobustCommand\\vec[1]{\\mathchoice{\\mbox{\\boldmath$\\displaystyle#1$}}\n{\\mbox{\\boldmath$\\textstyle#1$}}\n{\\mbox{\\boldmath$\\scriptstyle#1$}}\n{\\mbox{\\boldmath$\\scriptscriptstyle#1$}}}\n\\fi\n\n\\def\\squareforqed{\\hbox{\\rlap{$\\sqcap$}$\\sqcup$}}\n\\def\\qed{\\ifmmode\\squareforqed\\else{\\unskip\\nobreak\\hfil\n\\penalty50\\hskip1em\\null\\nobreak\\hfil\\squareforqed\n\\parfillskip=0pt\\finalhyphendemerits=0\\endgraf}\\fi}\n\n\\def\\getsto{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\n\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\gets\\cr\\to\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\gets\n\\cr\\to\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\gets\n\\cr\\to\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n\\gets\\cr\\to\\cr}}}}}\n\\def\\lid{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n<\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip0.9pt}=\\cr}}}}}\n\\def\\gid{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip0.9pt}=\\cr}}}}}\n\\def\\grole{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\n\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-1pt}<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-1pt}<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-0.8pt}<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-0.3pt}<\\cr}}}}}\n\\def\\bbbr{{\\rm I\\!R}} %reelle Zahlen\n\\def\\bbbm{{\\rm I\\!M}}\n\\def\\bbbn{{\\rm I\\!N}} %natuerliche Zahlen\n\\def\\bbbf{{\\rm I\\!F}}\n\\def\\bbbh{{\\rm I\\!H}}\n\\def\\bbbk{{\\rm I\\!K}}\n\\def\\bbbp{{\\rm I\\!P}}\n\\def\\bbbone{{\\mathchoice {\\rm 1\\mskip-4mu l} {\\rm 1\\mskip-4mu l}\n{\\rm 1\\mskip-4.5mu l} {\\rm 1\\mskip-5mu l}}}\n\\def\\bbbc{{\\mathchoice {\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\rm C$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\textstyle\\rm C$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle\\rm C$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\rm C$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}}}\n\\def\\bbbq{{\\mathchoice {\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\rm\nQ$}\\hbox{\\raise\n0.15\\ht0\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.8\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\textstyle\\rm Q$}\\hbox{\\raise\n0.15\\ht0\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.8\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle\\rm Q$}\\hbox{\\raise\n0.15\\ht0\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.7\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\rm Q$}\\hbox{\\raise\n0.15\\ht0\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.7\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}}}\n\\def\\bbbt{{\\mathchoice {\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\rm\nT$}\\hbox{\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.3\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\textstyle\\rm T$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.3\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle\\rm T$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.3\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\rm T$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.3\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}}}\n\\def\\bbbs{{\\mathchoice\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle \\rm S$}\\hbox{\\raise0.5\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.35\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.55\\wd0\\vrule height0.5\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\textstyle \\rm S$}\\hbox{\\raise0.5\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.35\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.55\\wd0\\vrule height0.5\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle \\rm S$}\\hbox{\\raise0.5\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.35\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\raise0.05\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.5\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\rm S$}\\hbox{\\raise0.5\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\raise0.05\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.55\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}}}\n\\def\\bbbz{{\\mathchoice {\\hbox{$\\mathsf\\textstyle Z\\kern-0.4em Z$}}\n{\\hbox{$\\mathsf\\textstyle Z\\kern-0.4em Z$}}\n{\\hbox{$\\mathsf\\scriptstyle Z\\kern-0.3em Z$}}\n{\\hbox{$\\mathsf\\scriptscriptstyle Z\\kern-0.2em Z$}}}}\n\n\\let\\ts\\,\n\n\\setlength\\leftmargini {17\\p@}\n\\setlength\\leftmargin {\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginii {\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiii {\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiv {\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength \\labelsep {.5em}\n\\setlength \\labelwidth{\\leftmargini}\n\\addtolength\\labelwidth{-\\labelsep}\n\n\\def\\@listI{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\parsep 0\\p@ \\@plus1\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\topsep 8\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\itemsep0\\p@}\n\\let\\@listi\\@listI\n\\@listi\n\\def\\@listii {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 0\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus\\p@}\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 0\\p@ \\@plus\\p@\\@minus\\p@\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\partopsep \\p@ \\@plus\\z@ \\@minus\\p@}\n\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemi{\\normalfont\\bfseries --}\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemii{$\\m@th\\bullet$}\n\n\\setlength\\arraycolsep{1.4\\p@}\n\\setlength\\tabcolsep{1.4\\p@}\n\n\\def\\tableofcontents{\\chapter*{\\contentsname\\@mkboth{{\\contentsname}}%\n {{\\contentsname}}}\n \\def\\authcount##1{\\setcounter{auco}{##1}\\setcounter{@auth}{1}}\n \\def\\lastand{\\ifnum\\value{auco}=2\\relax\n \\unskip{} \\andname\\\n \\else\n \\unskip \\lastandname\\\n \\fi}%\n \\def\\and{\\stepcounter{@auth}\\relax\n \\ifnum\\value{@auth}=\\value{auco}%\n \\lastand\n \\else\n \\unskip,\n \\fi}%\n \\@starttoc{toc}\\if@restonecol\\twocolumn\\fi}\n\n\\def\\l@part#1#2{\\addpenalty{\\@secpenalty}%\n \\addvspace{2em plus\\p@}% % space above part line\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@\n \\rightskip \\z@ plus 5em\n \\hrule\\vskip5pt\n \\large % same size as for a contribution heading\n \\bfseries\\boldmath % set line in boldface\n \\leavevmode % TeX command to enter horizontal mode.\n #1\\par\n \\vskip5pt\n \\hrule\n \\vskip1pt\n \\nobreak % Never break after part entry\n \\endgroup}\n\n\\def\\@dotsep{2}\n\n\\let\\phantomsection=\\relax\n\n\\def\\hyperhrefextend{\\ifx\\hyper@anchor\\@undefined\\else\n{}\\fi}\n\n\\def\\addnumcontentsmark#1#2#3{%\n\\addtocontents{#1}{\\protect\\contentsline{#2}{\\protect\\numberline\n {\\thechapter}#3}{\\thepage}\\hyperhrefextend}}%\n\\def\\addcontentsmark#1#2#3{%\n\\addtocontents{#1}{\\protect\\contentsline{#2}{#3}{\\thepage}\\hyperhrefextend}}%\n\\def\\addcontentsmarkwop#1#2#3{%\n\\addtocontents{#1}{\\protect\\contentsline{#2}{#3}{0}\\hyperhrefextend}}%\n\n\\def\\@adcmk[#1]{\\ifcase #1 \\or\n\\def\\@gtempa{\\addnumcontentsmark}%\n \\or \\def\\@gtempa{\\addcontentsmark}%\n \\or \\def\\@gtempa{\\addcontentsmarkwop}%\n \\fi\\@gtempa{toc}{chapter}%\n}\n\\def\\addtocmark{%\n\\phantomsection\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@adcmk}{\\@adcmk[3]}%\n}\n\n\\def\\l@chapter#1#2{\\addpenalty{-\\@highpenalty}\n \\vskip 1.0em plus 1pt \\@tempdima 1.5em \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@ \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg\n \\advance\\rightskip by 0pt plus 2cm\n \\parfillskip -\\rightskip \\pretolerance=10000\n \\leavevmode \\advance\\leftskip\\@tempdima \\hskip -\\leftskip\n {\\large\\bfseries\\boldmath#1}\\ifx0#2\\hfil\\null\n \\else\n \\nobreak\n \\leaders\\hbox{$\\m@th \\mkern \\@dotsep mu.\\mkern\n \\@dotsep mu$}\\hfill\n \\nobreak\\hbox to\\@pnumwidth{\\hss #2}%\n \\fi\\par\n \\penalty\\@highpenalty \\endgroup}\n\n\\def\\l@title#1#2{\\addpenalty{-\\@highpenalty}\n \\addvspace{8pt plus 1pt}\n \\@tempdima \\z@\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@ \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg\n \\advance\\rightskip by 0pt plus 2cm\n \\parfillskip -\\rightskip \\pretolerance=10000\n \\leavevmode \\advance\\leftskip\\@tempdima \\hskip -\\leftskip\n #1\\nobreak\n \\leaders\\hbox{$\\m@th \\mkern \\@dotsep mu.\\mkern\n \\@dotsep mu$}\\hfill\n \\nobreak\\hbox to\\@pnumwidth{\\hss #2}\\par\n \\penalty\\@highpenalty \\endgroup}\n\n\\def\\l@author#1#2{\\addpenalty{\\@highpenalty}\n \\@tempdima=15\\p@ %\\z@\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@ \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg\n \\advance\\rightskip by 0pt plus 2cm\n \\pretolerance=10000\n \\leavevmode \\advance\\leftskip\\@tempdima %\\hskip -\\leftskip\n \\textit{#1}\\par\n \\penalty\\@highpenalty \\endgroup}\n\n\\setcounter{tocdepth}{0}\n\\newdimen\\tocchpnum\n\\newdimen\\tocsecnum\n\\newdimen\\tocsectotal\n\\newdimen\\tocsubsecnum\n\\newdimen\\tocsubsectotal\n\\newdimen\\tocsubsubsecnum\n\\newdimen\\tocsubsubsectotal\n\\newdimen\\tocparanum\n\\newdimen\\tocparatotal\n\\newdimen\\tocsubparanum\n\\tocchpnum=\\z@ % no chapter numbers\n\\tocsecnum=15\\p@ % section 88. plus 2.222pt\n\\tocsubsecnum=23\\p@ % subsection 88.8 plus 2.222pt\n\\tocsubsubsecnum=27\\p@ % subsubsection 88.8.8 plus 1.444pt\n\\tocparanum=35\\p@ % paragraph 88.8.8.8 plus 1.666pt\n\\tocsubparanum=43\\p@ % subparagraph 88.8.8.8.8 plus 1.888pt\n\\def\\calctocindent{%\n\\tocsectotal=\\tocchpnum\n\\advance\\tocsectotal by\\tocsecnum\n\\tocsubsectotal=\\tocsectotal\n\\advance\\tocsubsectotal by\\tocsubsecnum\n\\tocsubsubsectotal=\\tocsubsectotal\n\\advance\\tocsubsubsectotal by\\tocsubsubsecnum\n\\tocparatotal=\\tocsubsubsectotal\n\\advance\\tocparatotal by\\tocparanum}\n\\calctocindent\n\n\\def\\l@section{\\@dottedtocline{1}{\\tocchpnum}{\\tocsecnum}}\n\\def\\l@subsection{\\@dottedtocline{2}{\\tocsectotal}{\\tocsubsecnum}}\n\\def\\l@subsubsection{\\@dottedtocline{3}{\\tocsubsectotal}{\\tocsubsubsecnum}}\n\\def\\l@paragraph{\\@dottedtocline{4}{\\tocsubsubsectotal}{\\tocparanum}}\n\\def\\l@subparagraph{\\@dottedtocline{5}{\\tocparatotal}{\\tocsubparanum}}\n\n\\def\\listoffigures{\\@restonecolfalse\\if@twocolumn\\@restonecoltrue\\onecolumn\n \\fi\\section*{\\listfigurename\\@mkboth{{\\listfigurename}}{{\\listfigurename}}}\n \\@starttoc{lof}\\if@restonecol\\twocolumn\\fi}\n\\def\\l@figure{\\@dottedtocline{1}{0em}{1.5em}}\n\n\\def\\listoftables{\\@restonecolfalse\\if@twocolumn\\@restonecoltrue\\onecolumn\n \\fi\\section*{\\listtablename\\@mkboth{{\\listtablename}}{{\\listtablename}}}\n \\@starttoc{lot}\\if@restonecol\\twocolumn\\fi}\n\\let\\l@table\\l@figure\n\n\\renewcommand\\listoffigures{%\n \\section*{\\listfigurename\n \\@mkboth{\\listfigurename}{\\listfigurename}}%\n \\@starttoc{lof}%\n }\n\n\\renewcommand\\listoftables{%\n \\section*{\\listtablename\n \\@mkboth{\\listtablename}{\\listtablename}}%\n \\@starttoc{lot}%\n }\n\n\\ifx\\oribibl\\undefined\n\\ifx\\citeauthoryear\\undefined\n\\renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]\n {\\section*{\\refname}\n \\def\\@biblabel##1{##1.}\n \\small\n \\list{\\@biblabel{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n {\\settowidth\\labelwidth{\\@biblabel{#1}}%\n \\leftmargin\\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\labelsep\n \\if@openbib\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\bibindent\n \\itemindent -\\bibindent\n \\listparindent \\itemindent\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\fi\n \\usecounter{enumiv}%\n \\let\\p@enumiv\\@empty\n \\renewcommand\\theenumiv{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n \\if@openbib\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\par}%\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\hskip .11em \\@plus.33em \\@minus.07em}%\n \\fi\n \\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000%\n \\sfcode`\\.=\\@m}\n {\\def\\@noitemerr\n {\\@latex@warning{Empty `thebibliography' environment}}%\n \\endlist}\n\\def\\@lbibitem[#1]#2{\\item[{[#1]}\\hfill]\\if@filesw\n {\\let\\protect\\noexpand\\immediate\n \\write\\@auxout{\\string\\bibcite{#2}{#1}}}\\fi\\ignorespaces}\n\\newcount\\@tempcntc\n\\def\\@citex[#1]#2{\\if@filesw\\immediate\\write\\@auxout{\\string\\citation{#2}}\\fi\n \\@tempcnta\\z@\\@tempcntb\\m@ne\\def\\@citea{}\\@cite{\\@for\\@citeb:=#2\\do\n {\\@ifundefined\n {b@\\@citeb}{\\@citeo\\@tempcntb\\m@ne\\@citea\\def\\@citea{,}{\\bfseries\n ?}\\@warning\n {Citation `\\@citeb' on page \\thepage \\space undefined}}%\n {\\setbox\\z@\\hbox{\\global\\@tempcntc0\\csname b@\\@citeb\\endcsname\\relax}%\n \\ifnum\\@tempcntc=\\z@ \\@citeo\\@tempcntb\\m@ne\n \\@citea\\def\\@citea{,}\\hbox{\\csname b@\\@citeb\\endcsname}%\n \\else\n \\advance\\@tempcntb\\@ne\n \\ifnum\\@tempcntb=\\@tempcntc\n \\else\\advance\\@tempcntb\\m@ne\\@citeo\n \\@tempcnta\\@tempcntc\\@tempcntb\\@tempcntc\\fi\\fi}}\\@citeo}{#1}}\n\\def\\@citeo{\\ifnum\\@tempcnta>\\@tempcntb\\else\n \\@citea\\def\\@citea{,\\,\\hskip\\z@skip}%\n \\ifnum\\@tempcnta=\\@tempcntb\\the\\@tempcnta\\else\n {\\advance\\@tempcnta\\@ne\\ifnum\\@tempcnta=\\@tempcntb \\else\n \\def\\@citea{--}\\fi\n \\advance\\@tempcnta\\m@ne\\the\\@tempcnta\\@citea\\the\\@tempcntb}\\fi\\fi}\n\\else\n\\renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]\n {\\section*{\\refname}\n \\small\n \\list{}%\n {\\settowidth\\labelwidth{}%\n \\leftmargin\\parindent\n \\itemindent=-\\parindent\n \\labelsep=\\z@\n \\if@openbib\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\bibindent\n \\itemindent -\\bibindent\n \\listparindent \\itemindent\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\fi\n \\usecounter{enumiv}%\n \\let\\p@enumiv\\@empty\n \\renewcommand\\theenumiv{}}%\n \\if@openbib\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\par}%\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\hskip .11em \\@plus.33em \\@minus.07em}%\n \\fi\n \\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000%\n \\sfcode`\\.=\\@m}\n {\\def\\@noitemerr\n {\\@latex@warning{Empty `thebibliography' environment}}%\n \\endlist}\n \\def\\@cite#1{#1}%\n \\def\\@lbibitem[#1]#2{\\item[]\\if@filesw\n {\\def\\protect##1{\\string ##1\\space}\\immediate\n \\write\\@auxout{\\string\\bibcite{#2}{#1}}}\\fi\\ignorespaces}\n \\fi\n\\else\n\\@cons\\@openbib@code{\\noexpand\\small}\n\\fi\n\n\\def\\idxquad{\\hskip 10\\p@}% space that divides entry from number\n\n\\def\\@idxitem{\\par\\hangindent 10\\p@}\n\n\\def\\subitem{\\par\\setbox0=\\hbox{--\\enspace}% second order\n \\noindent\\hangindent\\wd0\\box0}% index entry\n\n\\def\\subsubitem{\\par\\setbox0=\\hbox{--\\,--\\enspace}% third\n \\noindent\\hangindent\\wd0\\box0}% order index entry\n\n\\def\\indexspace{\\par \\vskip 10\\p@ plus5\\p@ minus3\\p@\\relax}\n\n\\renewenvironment{theindex}\n {\\@mkboth{\\indexname}{\\indexname}%\n \\thispagestyle{empty}\\parindent\\z@\n \\parskip\\z@ \\@plus .3\\p@\\relax\n \\let\\item\\par\n \\def\\,{\\relax\\ifmmode\\mskip\\thinmuskip\n \\else\\hskip0.2em\\ignorespaces\\fi}%\n \\normalfont\\small\n \\begin{multicols}{2}[\\@makeschapterhead{\\indexname}]%\n }\n {\\end{multicols}}\n\n\\renewcommand\\footnoterule{%\n \\kern-3\\p@\n \\hrule\\@width 2truecm\n \\kern2.6\\p@}\n \\newdimen\\fnindent\n \\fnindent1em\n\\long\\def\\@makefntext#1{%\n \\parindent \\fnindent%\n \\leftskip \\fnindent%\n \\noindent\n \\llap{\\hb@xt@1em{\\hss\\@makefnmark\\ }}\\ignorespaces#1}\n\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{%\n \\small\n \\vskip\\abovecaptionskip\n \\sbox\\@tempboxa{{\\bfseries #1.} #2}%\n \\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize\n {\\bfseries #1.} #2\\par\n \\else\n \\global \\@minipagefalse\n \\hb@xt@\\hsize{\\hfil\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n \\fi\n \\vskip\\belowcaptionskip}\n\n\\def\\fps@figure{htbp}\n\\def\\fnum@figure{\\figurename\\thinspace\\thefigure}\n\\def \\@floatboxreset {%\n \\reset@font\n \\small\n \\@setnobreak\n \\@setminipage\n}\n\\def\\fps@table{htbp}\n\\def\\fnum@table{\\tablename~\\thetable}\n\\renewenvironment{table}\n {\\setlength\\abovecaptionskip{0\\p@}%\n \\setlength\\belowcaptionskip{10\\p@}%\n \\@float{table}}\n {\\end@float}\n\\renewenvironment{table*}\n {\\setlength\\abovecaptionskip{0\\p@}%\n \\setlength\\belowcaptionskip{10\\p@}%\n \\@dblfloat{table}}\n {\\end@dblfloat}\n\n\\long\\def\\@caption#1[#2]#3{\\par\\addcontentsline{\\csname\n ext@#1\\endcsname}{#1}{\\protect\\numberline{\\csname\n the#1\\endcsname}{\\ignorespaces #2}}\\begingroup\n \\@parboxrestore\n \\@makecaption{\\csname fnum@#1\\endcsname}{\\ignorespaces #3}\\par\n \\endgroup}\n\n% LaTeX does not provide a command to enter the authors institute\n% addresses. The \\institute command is defined here.\n\n\\newcounter{@inst}\n\\newcounter{@auth}\n\\newcounter{auco}\n\\newdimen\\instindent\n\\newbox\\authrun\n\\newtoks\\authorrunning\n\\newtoks\\tocauthor\n\\newbox\\titrun\n\\newtoks\\titlerunning\n\\newtoks\\toctitle\n\n\\def\\clearheadinfo{\\gdef\\@author{No Author Given}%\n \\gdef\\@title{No Title Given}%\n \\gdef\\@subtitle{}%\n \\gdef\\@institute{No Institute Given}%\n \\gdef\\@thanks{}%\n \\global\\titlerunning={}\\global\\authorrunning={}%\n \\global\\toctitle={}\\global\\tocauthor={}}\n\n\\def\\institute#1{\\gdef\\@institute{#1}}\n\n\\def\\institutename{\\par\n \\begingroup\n \\parskip=\\z@\n \\parindent=\\z@\n \\setcounter{@inst}{1}%\n \\def\\and{\\par\\stepcounter{@inst}%\n \\noindent$^{\\the@inst}$\\enspace\\ignorespaces}%\n \\setbox0=\\vbox{\\def\\thanks##1{}\\@institute}%\n \\ifnum\\c@@inst=1\\relax\n \\gdef\\fnnstart{0}%\n \\else\n \\xdef\\fnnstart{\\c@@inst}%\n \\setcounter{@inst}{1}%\n \\noindent$^{\\the@inst}$\\enspace\n \\fi\n \\ignorespaces\n \\@institute\\par\n \\endgroup}\n\n\\def\\@fnsymbol#1{\\ensuremath{\\ifcase#1\\or\\star\\or{\\star\\star}\\or\n {\\star\\star\\star}\\or \\dagger\\or \\ddagger\\or\n \\mathchar \"278\\or \\mathchar \"27B\\or \\|\\or **\\or \\dagger\\dagger\n \\or \\ddagger\\ddagger \\else\\@ctrerr\\fi}}\n\n\\def\\inst#1{\\unskip$^{#1}$}\n\\def\\orcidID#1{\\unskip$^{[#1]}$} % added MR 2018-03-10\n\\def\\fnmsep{\\unskip$^,$}\n\\def\\email#1{{\\tt#1}}\n\n\\AtBeginDocument{\\@ifundefined{url}{\\def\\url#1{#1}}{}%\n\\@ifpackageloaded{babel}{%\n\\@ifundefined{extrasenglish}{}{\\addto\\extrasenglish{\\switcht@albion}}%\n\\@ifundefined{extrasfrenchb}{}{\\addto\\extrasfrenchb{\\switcht@francais}}%\n\\@ifundefined{extrasgerman}{}{\\addto\\extrasgerman{\\switcht@deutsch}}%\n\\@ifundefined{extrasngerman}{}{\\addto\\extrasngerman{\\switcht@deutsch}}%\n}{\\switcht@@therlang}%\n\\providecommand{\\keywords}[1]{\\def\\and{{\\textperiodcentered} }%\n\\par\\addvspace\\baselineskip\n\\noindent\\keywordname\\enspace\\ignorespaces#1}%\n\\@ifpackageloaded{hyperref}{%\n\\def\\doi#1{\\href{https://doi.org/\\detokenize{#1}}{\\url{https://doi.org/#1}}}}{\n\\def\\doi#1{https://doi.org/\\detokenize{#1}}}\n}\n\\def\\homedir{\\~{ }}\n\n\\def\\subtitle#1{\\gdef\\@subtitle{#1}}\n\\clearheadinfo\n%\n%%% to avoid hyperref warnings\n\\providecommand*{\\toclevel@author}{999}\n%%% to make title-entry parent of section-entries\n\\providecommand*{\\toclevel@title}{0}\n%\n\\renewcommand\\maketitle{\\newpage\n\\phantomsection\n \\refstepcounter{chapter}%\n \\stepcounter{section}%\n \\setcounter{section}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{figure}{0}\n \\setcounter{table}{0}\n \\setcounter{equation}{0}\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}%\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent=\\z@\n \\renewcommand\\thefootnote{\\@fnsymbol\\c@footnote}%\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\ifnum \\col@number=\\@ne\n \\@maketitle\n \\else\n \\twocolumn[\\@maketitle]%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\newpage\n \\global\\@topnum\\z@ % Prevents figures from going at top of page.\n \\@maketitle\n \\fi\n \\thispagestyle{empty}\\@thanks\n%\n \\def\\\\{\\unskip\\ \\ignorespaces}\\def\\inst##1{\\unskip{}}%\n \\def\\thanks##1{\\unskip{}}\\def\\fnmsep{\\unskip}%\n \\instindent=\\hsize\n \\advance\\instindent by-\\headlineindent\n \\if!\\the\\toctitle!\\addcontentsline{toc}{title}{\\@title}\\else\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{title}{\\the\\toctitle}\\fi\n \\if@runhead\n \\if!\\the\\titlerunning!\\else\n \\edef\\@title{\\the\\titlerunning}%\n \\fi\n \\global\\setbox\\titrun=\\hbox{\\small\\rm\\unboldmath\\ignorespaces\\@title}%\n \\ifdim\\wd\\titrun>\\instindent\n \\typeout{Title too long for running head. Please supply}%\n \\typeout{a shorter form with \\string\\titlerunning\\space prior to\n \\string\\maketitle}%\n \\global\\setbox\\titrun=\\hbox{\\small\\rm\n Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length}%\n \\fi\n \\xdef\\@title{\\copy\\titrun}%\n \\fi\n%\n \\if!\\the\\tocauthor!\\relax\n {\\def\\and{\\noexpand\\protect\\noexpand\\and}%\n \\def\\inst##1{}% added MR 2017-09-20 to remove inst numbers from the TOC\n \\def\\orcidID##1{}% added MR 2017-09-20 to remove ORCID ids from the TOC\n \\protected@xdef\\toc@uthor{\\@author}}%\n \\else\n \\def\\\\{\\noexpand\\protect\\noexpand\\newline}%\n \\protected@xdef\\scratch{\\the\\tocauthor}%\n \\protected@xdef\\toc@uthor{\\scratch}%\n \\fi\n \\addtocontents{toc}{\\noexpand\\protect\\noexpand\\authcount{\\the\\c@auco}}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{author}{\\toc@uthor}%\n \\if@runhead\n \\if!\\the\\authorrunning!\n \\value{@inst}=\\value{@auth}%\n \\setcounter{@auth}{1}%\n \\else\n \\edef\\@author{\\the\\authorrunning}%\n \\fi\n \\global\\setbox\\authrun=\\hbox{\\def\\inst##1{}% added MR 2017-09-20 to remove inst numbers from the runninghead\n \\def\\orcidID##1{}% added MR 2017-09-20 to remove ORCID ids from the runninghead\n \\small\\unboldmath\\@author\\unskip}%\n \\ifdim\\wd\\authrun>\\instindent\n \\typeout{Names of authors too long for running head. Please supply}%\n \\typeout{a shorter form with \\string\\authorrunning\\space prior to\n \\string\\maketitle}%\n \\global\\setbox\\authrun=\\hbox{\\small\\rm\n Authors Suppressed Due to Excessive Length}%\n \\fi\n \\xdef\\@author{\\copy\\authrun}%\n \\markboth{\\@author}{\\@title}%\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\setcounter{footnote}{\\fnnstart}%\n \\clearheadinfo}\n%\n\\def\\@maketitle{\\newpage\n \\markboth{}{}%\n \\def\\lastand{\\ifnum\\value{@inst}=2\\relax\n \\unskip{} \\andname\\\n \\else\n \\unskip \\lastandname\\\n \\fi}%\n \\def\\and{\\stepcounter{@auth}\\relax\n \\ifnum\\value{@auth}=\\value{@inst}%\n \\lastand\n \\else\n \\unskip,\n \\fi}%\n \\begin{center}%\n \\let\\newline\\\\\n {\\Large \\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\pretolerance=10000\n \\@title \\par}\\vskip .8cm\n\\if!\\@subtitle!\\else {\\large \\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\vskip -.65cm\n \\pretolerance=10000\n \\@subtitle \\par}\\vskip .8cm\\fi\n \\setbox0=\\vbox{\\setcounter{@auth}{1}\\def\\and{\\stepcounter{@auth}}%\n \\def\\thanks##1{}\\@author}%\n \\global\\value{@inst}=\\value{@auth}%\n \\global\\value{auco}=\\value{@auth}%\n \\setcounter{@auth}{1}%\n{\\lineskip .5em\n\\noindent\\ignorespaces\n\\@author\\vskip.35cm}\n {\\small\\institutename}\n \\end{center}%\n }\n\n% definition of the \"\\spnewtheorem\" command.\n%\n% Usage:\n%\n% \\spnewtheorem{env_nam}{caption}[within]{cap_font}{body_font}\n% or \\spnewtheorem{env_nam}[numbered_like]{caption}{cap_font}{body_font}\n% or \\spnewtheorem*{env_nam}{caption}{cap_font}{body_font}\n%\n% New is \"cap_font\" and \"body_font\". It stands for\n% fontdefinition of the caption and the text itself.\n%\n% \"\\spnewtheorem*\" gives a theorem without number.\n%\n% A defined spnewthoerem environment is used as described\n% by Lamport.\n%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\def\\@thmcountersep{}\n\\def\\@thmcounterend{.}\n\n\\def\\spnewtheorem{\\@ifstar{\\@sthm}{\\@Sthm}}\n\n% definition of \\spnewtheorem with number\n\n\\def\\@spnthm#1#2{%\n \\@ifnextchar[{\\@spxnthm{#1}{#2}}{\\@spynthm{#1}{#2}}}\n\\def\\@Sthm#1{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@spothm{#1}}{\\@spnthm{#1}}}\n\n\\def\\@spxnthm#1#2[#3]#4#5{\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\@definecounter{#1}\\@addtoreset{#1}{#3}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname the#1\\endcsname{\\expandafter\\noexpand\n \\csname the#3\\endcsname \\noexpand\\@thmcountersep \\@thmcounter{#1}}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname #1name\\endcsname{#2}%\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@spthm{#1}{\\csname #1name\\endcsname}{#4}{#5}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}\n\n\\def\\@spynthm#1#2#3#4{\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\@definecounter{#1}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname the#1\\endcsname{\\@thmcounter{#1}}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname #1name\\endcsname{#2}%\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@spthm{#1}{\\csname #1name\\endcsname}{#3}{#4}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}\n\n\\def\\@spothm#1[#2]#3#4#5{%\n \\@ifundefined{c@#2}{\\@latexerr{No theorem environment `#2' defined}\\@eha}%\n {\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\newaliascnt{#1}{#2}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname #1name\\endcsname{#3}%\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@spthm{#1}{\\csname #1name\\endcsname}{#4}{#5}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}}\n\n\\def\\@spthm#1#2#3#4{\\topsep 7\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n\\refstepcounter{#1}%\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@spythm{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}}{\\@spxthm{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}}}\n\n\\def\\@spxthm#1#2#3#4{\\@spbegintheorem{#2}{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}{#3}{#4}%\n \\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\@spythm#1#2#3#4[#5]{\\@spopargbegintheorem{#2}{\\csname\n the#1\\endcsname}{#5}{#3}{#4}\\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\@spbegintheorem#1#2#3#4{\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{#3#1\\ #2\\@thmcounterend}]#4}\n\n\\def\\@spopargbegintheorem#1#2#3#4#5{\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{#4#1\\ #2}]{#4(#3)\\@thmcounterend\\ }#5}\n\n% definition of \\spnewtheorem* without number\n\n\\def\\@sthm#1#2{\\@Ynthm{#1}{#2}}\n\n\\def\\@Ynthm#1#2#3#4{\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@Thm{\\csname #1name\\endcsname}{#3}{#4}}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname #1name\\endcsname{#2}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}\n\n\\def\\@Thm#1#2#3{\\topsep 7\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@Ythm{#1}{#2}{#3}}{\\@Xthm{#1}{#2}{#3}}}\n\n\\def\\@Xthm#1#2#3{\\@Begintheorem{#1}{#2}{#3}\\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\@Ythm#1#2#3[#4]{\\@Opargbegintheorem{#1}\n {#4}{#2}{#3}\\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\@Begintheorem#1#2#3{#3\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{#2#1\\@thmcounterend}]}\n\n\\def\\@Opargbegintheorem#1#2#3#4{#4\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{#3#1}]{#3(#2)\\@thmcounterend\\ }}\n\n\\if@envcntsect\n \\def\\@thmcountersep{.}\n \\spnewtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\else\n \\spnewtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n \\if@envcntreset\n \\@addtoreset{theorem}{section}\n \\else\n \\@addtoreset{theorem}{chapter}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n%definition of divers theorem environments\n\\spnewtheorem*{claim}{Claim}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spnewtheorem*{proof}{Proof}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\if@envcntsame % alle Umgebungen wie Theorem.\n \\def\\spn@wtheorem#1#2#3#4{\\@spothm{#1}[theorem]{#2}{#3}{#4}}\n\\else % alle Umgebungen mit eigenem Zaehler\n \\if@envcntsect % mit section numeriert\n \\def\\spn@wtheorem#1#2#3#4{\\@spxnthm{#1}{#2}[section]{#3}{#4}}\n \\else % nicht mit section numeriert\n \\if@envcntreset\n \\def\\spn@wtheorem#1#2#3#4{\\@spynthm{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}\n \\@addtoreset{#1}{section}}\n \\else\n \\def\\spn@wtheorem#1#2#3#4{\\@spynthm{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}\n \\@addtoreset{#1}{chapter}}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\\spn@wtheorem{case}{Case}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{conjecture}{Conjecture}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{corollary}{Corollary}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\spn@wtheorem{definition}{Definition}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\spn@wtheorem{example}{Example}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{exercise}{Exercise}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\spn@wtheorem{note}{Note}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{problem}{Problem}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{property}{Property}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{proposition}{Proposition}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\spn@wtheorem{question}{Question}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{solution}{Solution}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{remark}{Remark}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\n\\def\\@takefromreset#1#2{%\n \\def\\@tempa{#1}%\n \\let\\@tempd\\@elt\n \\def\\@elt##1{%\n \\def\\@tempb{##1}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\\else\n \\@addtoreset{##1}{#2}%\n \\fi}%\n \\expandafter\\expandafter\\let\\expandafter\\@tempc\\csname cl@#2\\endcsname\n \\expandafter\\def\\csname cl@#2\\endcsname{}%\n \\@tempc\n \\let\\@elt\\@tempd}\n\n\\def\\theopargself{\\def\\@spopargbegintheorem##1##2##3##4##5{\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{##4##1\\ ##2}]{##4##3\\@thmcounterend\\ }##5}\n \\def\\@Opargbegintheorem##1##2##3##4{##4\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{##3##1}]{##3##2\\@thmcounterend\\ }}\n }\n\n\\renewenvironment{abstract}{%\n \\list{}{\\advance\\topsep by0.35cm\\relax\\small\n \\leftmargin=1cm\n \\labelwidth=\\z@\n \\listparindent=\\z@\n \\itemindent\\listparindent\n \\rightmargin\\leftmargin}\\item[\\hskip\\labelsep\n \\bfseries\\abstractname]}\n {\\endlist}\n\n\\newdimen\\headlineindent % dimension for space between\n\\headlineindent=1.166cm % number and text of headings.\n\n\\def\\ps@headings{\\let\\@mkboth\\@gobbletwo\n \\let\\@oddfoot\\@empty\\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n \\def\\@evenhead{\\normalfont\\small\\rlap{\\thepage}\\hspace{\\headlineindent}%\n \\leftmark\\hfil}\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\normalfont\\small\\hfil\\rightmark\\hspace{\\headlineindent}%\n \\llap{\\thepage}}\n \\def\\chaptermark##1{}%\n \\def\\sectionmark##1{}%\n \\def\\subsectionmark##1{}}\n\n\\def\\ps@titlepage{\\let\\@mkboth\\@gobbletwo\n \\let\\@oddfoot\\@empty\\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n \\def\\@evenhead{\\normalfont\\small\\rlap{\\thepage}\\hspace{\\headlineindent}%\n \\hfil}\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\normalfont\\small\\hfil\\hspace{\\headlineindent}%\n \\llap{\\thepage}}\n \\def\\chaptermark##1{}%\n \\def\\sectionmark##1{}%\n \\def\\subsectionmark##1{}}\n\n\\if@runhead\\ps@headings\\else\n\\ps@empty\\fi\n\n\\setlength\\arraycolsep{1.4\\p@}\n\\setlength\\tabcolsep{1.4\\p@}\n\n\\endinput\n%end of file llncs.cls\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: samplepaper.bbl\n================================================\n\\begin{thebibliography}{10}\n\\providecommand{\\url}[1]{\\texttt{#1}}\n\\providecommand{\\urlprefix}{URL }\n\\providecommand{\\doi}[1]{https://doi.org/#1}\n\n\\bibitem{belkin2003laplacian}\nBelkin, M., Niyogi, P.: Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation. Neural Computation \\textbf{15}(6), 1373--1396 (2003)\n\n\\bibitem{brachmann2019neural}\nBrachmann, E., Rother, C.: {N}eural-{G}uided {RANSAC}: {L}earning where to sample model hypotheses. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). pp. 4321--4330. IEEE (2019)\n\n\\bibitem{camerini1978min}\nCamerini, P.M.: The min-max spanning tree problem and some extensions. Information Processing Letters \\textbf{7}(1), ~10 (1978). \\doi{10.1016/0020-0190(78)90030-3}\n\n\\bibitem{campos2021orb}\nCampos, C., Elvira, R., G{\\'o}mez~Rodr{\\'\\i}guez, J.J., Montiel, J.M.M., Tard{\\'o}s, J.D.: {ORB}-{SLAM}3: An accurate open-source library for visual, visual-inertial, and multimap {SLAM}. IEEE Transactions on Robotics (2021)\n\n\\bibitem{choy2016unified}\nChoy, C.B., Xu, D., Gwak, J., Chen, K., Savarese, S.: {3D R2N2}: A unified approach for single and multi-view 3{D} object reconstruction. In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). pp. 628--644. Springer (2016)\n\n\\bibitem{detone2018superpoint}\nDeTone, D., Malisiewicz, T., Rabinovich, A.: Super{P}oint: Self-supervised interest point detection and description. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops. pp. 224--236 (2018)\n\n\\bibitem{dusmanu2019d2}\nDusmanu, M., Rocco, I., Pajdla, T., Pollefeys, M., Sivic, J., Torii, A., Sattler, T.: D2-{N}et: A trainable cnn for joint description and detection of local features. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2019)\n\n\\bibitem{fischler1981random}\nFischler, M.A., Bolles, R.C.: Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. In: Readings in computer vision. pp. 726--740. Morgan Kaufmann (1981)\n\n\\bibitem{hartley2003multiple}\nHartley, R., Zisserman, A.: Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge university press (2003)\n\n\\bibitem{he2024detector}\nHe, X., Sun, J., Wang, Y., Peng, S., Huang, Q., Bao, H., Zhou, X.: Detector-free structure from motion. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 21594--21603 (2024)\n\n\\bibitem{Jin2020}\nJin, Y., Mishkin, D., Mishchuk, A., Matas, J., Fua, P., Yi, K.M., Trulls, E.: {Image Matching across Wide Baselines: From Paper to Practice}. International Journal of Computer Vision (2020)\n\n\\bibitem{kerbl3Dgaussians}\nKerbl, B., Kopanas, G., Leimk{\\\"u}hler, T., Drettakis, G.: 3{D} gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Trans. Graph. \\textbf{42}(4) (July 2023), \\url{https://repo-sam.inria.fr/fungraph/3d-gaussian-splatting/}\n\n\\bibitem{kruskal1956shortest}\nKruskal, J.B.: On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical society \\textbf{7}(1), 48--50 (1956)\n\n\\bibitem{lindenberger2021pixel}\nLindenberger, P., Sarlin, P.E., Larsson, V., Pollefeys, M.: Pixel-perfect structure-from-motion with featuremetric refinement. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 4002--4011 (2021)\n\n\\bibitem{lindenberger2023lightglue}\nLindenberger, P., Sarlin, P.E., Pollefeys, M.: Light{G}lue: Local feature matching at light speed. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (2023)\n\n\\bibitem{lowe2004distinctive}\nLowe, D.G.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision \\textbf{60}(2), 91--110 (2004)\n\n\\bibitem{ma2004invitation}\nMa, Y., Koseck{\\'a}, J., Soatto, S., Sastry, S.S.: An Invitation to 3-D Vision: From Images to Models. Springer (2004)\n\n\\bibitem{marchand2016pose}\nMarchand, E., Uchiyama, H., Spindler, F.: Pose estimation for augmented reality: A hands-on survey. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics \\textbf{22}(12), 2633--2651 (2016)\n\n\\bibitem{mildenhall2020nerf}\nMildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P.P., Tancik, M., Barron, J.T., Ramamoorthi, R., Ng, R.: Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2020)\n\n\\bibitem{mur2015orb}\nMur-Artal, R., Montiel, J.M.M., Tard{\\'o}s, J.D.: {ORB-SLAM}: A versatile and accurate monocular {SLAM} system. IEEE Transactions on Robotics \\textbf{31}(5), 1147--1163 (2015)\n\n\\bibitem{ozyesil2015stable}\n\\\"Ozyeşil, O., Singer, A., Basri, R.: Stable camera motion estimation using convex programming. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences \\textbf{8}(2), 1261--1287 (2015)\n\n\\bibitem{ozyesil2017survey}\n\\\"Ozyeşil, O., Voroninski, V., Basri, R., Singer, A.: A survey of structure from motion. Acta Numerica \\textbf{26}, 305--364 (2017)\n\n\\bibitem{pan2024GLOMAP}\nPan, L., Barath, D., Pollefeys, M., Sch\\\"{o}nberger, J.L.: {Global Structure-from-Motion Revisited}. In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2024)\n\n\\bibitem{pollefeys2002surviving}\nPollefeys, M., Verbiest, F., Van~Gool, L.: Surviving dominant planes in uncalibrated structure and motion recovery. In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). pp. 837--851. Springer (2002)\n\n\\bibitem{prim1957shortest}\nPrim, R.C.: Shortest connection networks and some generalizations. The Bell System Technical Journal \\textbf{36}(6), 1389--1401 (1957)\n\n\\bibitem{rezende2016unsupervised}\nRezende, D.J., Eslami, S.M.A., Mohamed, S., Battaglia, P., Jaderberg, M., Heess, N.: Unsupervised learning of 3{D} structure from images. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS). pp. 4996--5004 (2016)\n\n\\bibitem{sarlin2020superglue}\nSarlin, P.E., DeTone, D., Malisiewicz, T., Rabinovich, A.: {SuperGlue}: Learning feature matching with graph neural networks. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 4937--4946 (2020)\n\n\\bibitem{schoenberger2016sfm}\nSch\\\"{o}nberger, J.L., Frahm, J.M.: Structure-from-motion revisited. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2016)\n\n\\bibitem{schonberger2016pixelwise}\nSchonberger, J.L., Zheng, E., Frahm, J.M., Pollefeys, M.: Pixelwise view selection for unstructured multi-view stereo. In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). pp. 501--518. Springer (2016)\n\n\\bibitem{snavely2006photo}\nSnavely, N., Seitz, S.M., Szeliski, R.: Photo {T}ourism: exploring photo collections in 3{D}. In: ACM Trans. Graph. vol.~25, pp. 835--846. ACM (2006)\n\n\\bibitem{sun2021loftr}\nSun, J., Shen, Z., Wang, Y., Bao, H., Zhou, X.: {LoFTR}: Detector-free local feature matching with transformers. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2021)\n\n\\bibitem{teed2020deepv2d}\nTeed, Z., Deng, J.: Deep{V}2{D}: Video to depth with differentiable structure from motion. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2020)\n\n\\bibitem{triggs2000bundle}\nTriggs, B., McLauchlan, P.F., Hartley, R.I., Fitzgibbon, A.W.: Bundle adjustment—a modern synthesis. In: International workshop on vision algorithms. pp. 298--372. Springer (2000)\n\n\\bibitem{wang2024vggsfm}\nWang, J., Karaev, N., Rupprecht, C., Novotny, D.: Vggsfm: Visual geometry grounded deep structure from motion. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 21686--21697 (2024)\n\n\\bibitem{zhou2020deeptam}\nZhou, H., Ummenhofer, B., Brox, T.: Deep{TAM}: Deep tracking and mapping with convolutional neural networks. International Journal of Computer Vision \\textbf{128}(3), 756--769 (2020)\n\n\\end{thebibliography}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: samplepaper.tex\n================================================\n% This is samplepaper.tex, a sample chapter demonstrating the\n% LLNCS macro package for Springer Computer Science proceedings;\n% Version 2.21 of 2022/01/12\n%\n\\documentclass[runningheads]{llncs}\n%\n\\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}\n% T1 fonts will be used to generate the final print and online PDFs,\n% so please use T1 fonts in your manuscript whenever possible.\n% Other font encondings may result in incorrect characters.\n%\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{amsfonts}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{pifont}\n\\usepackage{algorithm,algpseudocode}\n\n% Used for displaying a sample figure. If possible, figure files should\n% be included in EPS format.\n%\n% If you use the hyperref package, please uncomment the following two lines\n% to display URLs in blue roman font according to Springer's eBook style:\n%\\usepackage{color}\n%\\renewcommand\\UrlFont{\\color{blue}\\rmfamily}\n%\n\\DeclareMathOperator*{\\argmin}{arg\\,min}\n\\newcommand{\\xmark}{\\ding{55}}\n\\newcommand{\\vmark}{\\ding{51}}\n\\newcommand*{\\Break}{\\textbf{break}}\n\n\n\\begin{document}\n%\n\\title{Planar-SfM: Camera Pose Estimation via Homography Graph Embeddings}\n%\n%\\titlerunning{Abbreviated paper title}\n% If the paper title is too long for the running head, you can set\n% an abbreviated paper title here\n%\n\n\\author{Gabi Pragier$^{*}$ \\and \nMatan Karklinsky$^{*}$ \\and \nDavid Ungarish$^{*}$ \\and \nAvi Ben-Cohen}\n% \\author{Gabi Pragier \\and Matan Karklinsky \\and David Ungarish \\and Avi Ben-Cohen}\n%\n\\authorrunning{G. Pragier et al.}\n% First names are abbreviated in the running head.\n% If there are more than two authors, 'et al.' is used.\n%\n\\institute{Amazon Prime Video Live Events\\\\ \n\\email{\\{gabipragier,davidunga\\}@gmail.com} \\, \\email{\\{mtn,avibc\\}@amazon.com}\\\\\n$^{*}$Equal contribution}\n\n% \\institute{Amazon Prime Video Live Events\\\\ \\email{\\{gpragier, mtn, uda, avibc\\}@amazon.com}}\n%\n\\maketitle % typeset the header of the contribution\n%\n\\begin{abstract}\nStructure from Motion (SfM) systems traditionally struggle with planar scenes, where standard epipolar geometry-based methods become degenerate. Rather than viewing planar surfaces as a limitation, we propose a unified framework that leverages them as a source of geometric constraints. Our key insight is that each planar surface visible across multiple views provides an independent estimate of relative camera poses through homography decomposition. By aggregating estimates from multiple planes or even from a single dominant plane we achieve robust pose recovery in scenarios where traditional methods fail.\nWe introduce a novel graph-based approach that constructs a pose-graph from homography estimates and employs spectral embedding to identify and filter unreliable edges. Our method maps homography-based pose estimates onto the real line based on their geometric and visual consistency, enabling efficient extraction of a maximally consistent spanning tree for pose recovery. This approach naturally handles both highly planar scenes, such as indoor sports arenas, and general $3$D environments.\nWe demonstrate superior performance on basketball court imagery where existing methods struggle, while matching or exceeding state-of-the-art results on unconstrained outdoor scenes from the IMC Phototourism benchmark.\n\n\\keywords{Structure from Motion \\and Homography Decomposition \\and Planar Scenes \\and Camera Pose Estimation.}\n\\end{abstract}\n%\n%\n%\n\n\\section{Introduction}\n\\label{sec:intro}\n\nStructure from Motion (SfM) is fundamental to computer vision, enabling $3$D scene reconstruction from multiple viewpoints~\\cite{lindenberger2021pixel,ozyesil2017survey,schoenberger2016sfm,snavely2006photo}. Its applications span augmented reality~\\cite{marchand2016pose}, $3$D reconstruction~\\cite{choy2016unified,rezende2016unsupervised,schonberger2016pixelwise}, SLAM~\\cite{campos2021orb,mur2015orb}, and modern neural rendering techniques~\\cite{kerbl3Dgaussians,mildenhall2020nerf}.\nA significant limitation of existing SfM systems is their difficulty handling scenes that are dominated by a single planar surface. In such cases, the standard approach of estimating camera poses through epipolar geometry is subject to a two-parameter ambiguity~\\cite{hartley2003multiple}, resulting in a multifold solution space. Consequently, the estimation of the epipolar geometry becomes ill-posed and is prone to arbitrary determination by outlier correspondence. This is particularly problematic in many real-world applications, such as sports broadcasting in indoor arenas or architectural documentation, where large planar surfaces are common.\n\nWhile planar surfaces are often viewed as a challenge for SfM, we argue they present an opportunity. Even in general scenes, decomposing the environment into multiple planar segments offers distinct advantages. Each planar surface provides an independent estimate of relative camera poses through homography decomposition, and observing multiple planes offers complementary constraints that enable more robust pose recovery. By leveraging multiple such independent estimates, we can achieve more robust camera pose recovery than methods relying on point-based epipolar geometry alone.\nOur key insight is that by treating scenes as collections of planar surfaces, whether they actually contain one plane, multiple planes, or general $3$D structure, we can develop a unified approach that handles all cases effectively. We achieve this through three main contributions:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item An embedding framework that filters unreliable homography-based pose estimates, enabling camera motion recovery even in challenging single-plane scenarios where traditional methods struggle.\n \\item A multi-plane aware pose estimation strategy that leverages independent estimates from different planar regions to enhance accuracy, even in general $3$D scenes.\n \\item Comprehensive evaluation demonstrating superior performance both on planar scenes where traditional methods struggle, and on general scenes where our approach matches or exceeds state-of-the-art results.\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\section{Related Work}\n\\label{sec:related_work}\n\nConventional SfM pipelines typically follow a multi-stage process: feature detection across images~\\cite{detone2018superpoint,dusmanu2019d2,lowe2004distinctive} followed by feature matching across pairs~\\cite{brachmann2019neural,lindenberger2023lightglue,sarlin2020superglue,sun2021loftr}, and then estimation of relative camera poses (two-view geometry). Additional views are then incrementally registered in a sequential manner, which is prone for drift and error accumulation. A global optimization step, typically bundle adjustment~\\cite{triggs2000bundle}, refines camera parameters and $3$D point coordinates jointly. However, due to the non-convexity of this optimization, the accuracy of the final solution strongly depends on the quality of the initial estimates. To better handle structured environments, several methods have incorporated prior geometric knowledge. For example,~\\cite{fischler1981random} proposed a RANSAC-based scheme that exploits known planar structures by operating over camera trajectories. Similarly,~\\cite{pollefeys2002surviving} introduced a mechanism for filtering out degenerate images based on scene priors. Nonetheless, these sequential pipelines remain prone to local minima and often fail to reach globally optimal solutions. Recently, learning-based approaches have formulated SfM as a differentiable process~\\cite{teed2020deepv2d,zhou2020deeptam}, achieving state-of-the-art performance. Despite this progress, these methods lack explicit enforcement of multi-view geometric constraints, which can limit their accuracy in planar scenes.\n\n\\section{Method}\n\\label{sec:method}\n\\subsection{Setting}\n\\label{subec:setting}\nThe input consists of a set of $n$ images capturing a scene containing one or more planar surfaces, where the number of surfaces is unknown. The underlying cameras are assumed to be calibrated, that is with known intrinsic matrices which specify the focal length and principal point parameters. The goal is to recover the camera poses $(R_i, c_i) \\in SE(3), \\ i=1,\\ldots,n$, where $R_i$ and $c_i$ represent the orientation and position, respectively, of the $i$-th camera. We denote the relative pose between cameras $i$ and $j$ by\n$(R_{ij} , c_{ij}) \\in SE(3)$, where $R_{ij} = R_j R_i^T$ is their relative\norientation and $c_{ij} \\propto R_j(c_i - c_j)$ is their relative position. In addition, we denote by $n_\\pi \\in \\mathbb{S}^2$ the unit-length normal vector to the planar surface $\\pi$.\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width = \\textwidth]{system-pipeline.drawio.pdf}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Method Overview:} Our pipeline processes input images through four main stages: (1) feature detection and matching, (2) homography-based pose-graph construction, (3) graph pruning via real-line embedding, and (4) camera pose recovery.}\n \\label{fig:pipeline}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\n\\subsection{Overview}\n\\label{subsec:overview}\nOur method processes the input images in several stages, as illustrated in Figure~\\ref{fig:pipeline}. First, we construct a pose-graph where edges represent homographies estimated between image pairs (Section~\\ref{subec:homography pose-graph}). Each homography, when arising from a genuine planar surface, provides both the relative pose between the corresponding cameras and the surface normal through decomposition.\n\nTo handle potentially erroneous homographies, we develop a two-stage filtering approach. We first compute similarity scores between homographies based on their geometric and visual consistency (Section~\\ref{subsec:edge_similarity_score}). These scores incorporate both image-space evidence and structural validation against essential matrix-based estimates. We then use these scores to embed the multi-edges of our pose-graph onto the real line, allowing us to identify and retain only the most consistent set of edges (Section~\\ref{subsec:embedding}).\n\nFinally, we recover camera poses using the filtered pose-graph (Section~\\ref{subsec:pose_estimation}). We first consolidate multiple homography-based estimates within each retained edge into a single relative pose estimate. We then recover camera orientations by propagating through a spanning tree, and positions by extending to a bi-connected graph and solving a global optimization problem.\n\n\\subsection{Homography Pose-Graph}\n\\label{subec:homography pose-graph}\nBased on matched feature points between image pairs, we estimate $k_{ij} \\geq 0$ homographies $\\{H_{ij}^q\\}_{q=1}^{q=k_{ij}}$ for each image pair $(i,j)$, where each homography corresponds to a plane visible in both images. We represent the scene as a pose-graph $G=(V, E)$, an undirected multigraph where each node~$i \\in V$ represents a camera pose to be determined, and we connect nodes $i$ and $j$ with $k_{ij}$ edges whenever we find homographies between their images.\n\nA key property of homographies is that, given calibrated cameras, each homography $H_{ij}$ between images $i$ and $j$ of a plane $\\pi$ can be decomposed~\\cite{ma2004invitation} into\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:decomposition}\nH_{ij} \\mapsto (R_{ij}, c_{ij}, n_{ij}),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $n_{ij} = R_i n_{\\pi}$, and with $(R_{ij}, c_{ij})$ being precisely the relative pose defined in Section~\\ref{subec:setting} and is invariant to $\\pi$. Thus, when $H_{ij}^q$ arises from a genuine planar surface (rather than erroneous feature correspondences), its decomposition provides both the underlying relative pose and the plane normal expressed in camera $i$'s coordinate system. We next describe how to account for homographies arising from incorrect correspondences.\n\n\n\\subsection{Edge Similarity Score}\n\\label{subsec:edge_similarity_score}\nWhile each homography decomposition (Eq.~\\ref{eq:decomposition}) provides an estimate of relative camera pose, not all decompositions are reliable. However, since a spanning tree of the pose-graph $G$ suffices to recover camera poses, we can afford to be selective and retain only the most reliable edges. To identify these, we develop an embedding-based approach that maps each multi-edge onto the real line, allowing us to utilize spanning tree algorithms while accounting for geometric and visual \nconsistency.\n\nThe key insight is that reliable homographies induced by the same physical surface should exhibit consistent geometric and visual properties. We capture this consistency through a similarity matrix $S \\in \\mathbb{R}^{|E| \\times |E|}$, where each entry $S_{ij,lm}$ represents the expected consistency between incident multi-edges $e_{ij}, e_{lm} \\in E$:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:S}\nS_{ij,lm} = \\sum_{q=1}^{k_{ij}} \\sum_{q'=1}^{k_{lm}} P^{q,q'}_{ij,lm} \\eta(n^q_{ij}, n^{q'}_{lm}).\n\\end{equation}\nHere, $\\eta(n_a, n_b) = \\exp\\left(-\\arccos^2\\left({n_a^T n_b}\\right)\\right)$ measures the angular similarity between surface normals, and $P^{q,q'}_{ij,lm}$ represents the probability ($\\sum_{q, q'} P^{q,q'}_{ij,lm} = 1$) that homographies $H^q_{ij}$ and $H^{q'}_{lm}$ are not erroneous and correspond to the same physical surface. This probability is computed by combining image-space evidence and structural validation. Specifically, for any two homographies $H^q_{ij}$ and $H^{q'}_{lm}$ we define:\n\\begin{equation}\nP^{q,q'}_{ij,lm} \\propto \\mathcal{O}(H^q_{ij}, H^{q'}_{lm}) w_{ij}^q w_{lm}^{q'},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mathcal{O}(H^q_{ij}, H^{q'}_{lm})$ which counts the number of feature points that are inliers in both homographies, provides image-space evidence for whether the two homographies correspond to the same physical surface. The confidence scores $w_{ij}^q$ provide structural evidence for the validity of each homography by measuring its agreement with an independently estimated orientation. Specifically, these scores are defined using the angular similarity between the relative orientation $R_{ij}^q$ obtained from the homography decomposition (Eq.~\\ref{eq:decomposition}) and a plane-independent auxiliary orientation~$R_{ij}^{e}$ estimated from the decomposition of the essential-matrix~\\cite{hartley2003multiple} between images $i$ and $j$. Specifically, \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:w_ij}\nw_{ij}^q \\propto \\exp\\left(-\\epsilon^2\\left(R_{ij}^q, R_{ij}^{e}\\right)\\right), \n\\end{equation}\nwhere\n$$\n\\epsilon(R_a, R_b) = \\arccos\\left(\\frac{\\text{trace}(R_a^T R_b) - 1}{2}\\right)\n$$\nis the geodesic distance on $SO(3)$. \n\n\\subsection{Pose-Graph Embedding and Pruning}\n\\label{subsec:embedding}\nTo recover camera poses, we need a spanning tree of the pose-graph $G$. However, not all edges are equally reliable since some homographies may arise from incorrect correspondences or degenerate configurations. Our goal is to identify a spanning tree whose edges are mutually consistent, corresponding to valid homographies from compatible planar surfaces. To achieve this, we first embed the multi-edges onto the real line (using the similarity matrix $S$ from Eq.~\\ref{eq:S}) by solving \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:embedding}\n\\begin{aligned}\nh = &\\argmin_{\\tilde{h} \\in \\mathbb{R}^{|E|}} \\quad \\sum_{ij, lm \\in E} \\left(\\tilde{h}_{ij} - \\tilde{h}_{lm}\\right)^2 S_{ij, lm} \\\\\n&\\textrm{subject to} \\quad \\tilde{h}^T D \\tilde{h} = 1,\n\\end{aligned}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $D$ is the diagonal matrix of row sums of $S$. This formulation encourages similar edges (those with high $S_{ij,lm}$) to be embedded close together, while the constraint ensures a non-trivial solution that accounts for edge importance through $D$. The optimal solution is given by the eigenvector associated with the second-smallest eigenvalue of $I - D^{-1}S$~\\cite{belkin2003laplacian}, as the eigenvector of the smallest eigenvalue, namely the constant vector, is uninformative for our purpose.\n\nWith the embedding $h$ established, and since its scale is arbitrary, we define an inconsistency measure for any spanning tree $\\tilde{T}$ of the pose-graph $G$ as the magnitude of the support of its embedding $\\max_{ij,lm \\in E(\\tilde{T})} |h_{ij} - h_{lm}|$. The optimal spanning tree is then obtained by solving:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:IMOptimProblem}\n T = \\argmin_{\\tilde{T} \\subseteq G} \\left\\{ \\max_{ij,lm \\in E(\\tilde{T})} |h_{ij} - h_{lm}| \\right\\},\n\\end{equation}\nwhose solution $T$ is given by the minimum-range-spanning-tree of the weighted graph $G$ whose weights are given by the embedding $h$ obtained from Eq.~\\ref{eq:embedding}. The step-by-step process for determining the minimum-range-spanning-tree $T$ is outlined in Algorithm~\\ref{alg:MDST}, provided in Appendix~\\ref{sec:minimal range spanning tree}.\n\n\\subsection{Pose Estimation}\n\\label{subsec:pose_estimation}\n\nGiven the minimal-range spanning tree $T$, we next describe how to recover the camera poses. A key advantage of our approach is that any relative pose $(R_{ij}, c_{ij})$ is invariant to the underlying plane (as noted in Eq.~\\ref{eq:decomposition}). This invariance enables us to leverage multiple planar regions within each multi-edge to enhance accuracy: when multiple homographies are estimated between the same image pair, whether from distinct physical planes in a general $3$D scene or from different segmentations of a single dominant plane, their decompositions provide independent estimates of the same underlying relative pose. By aggregating these estimates, we effectively reduce noise and improve robustness.\n\nSpecifically, we consolidate the multiple pose estimates within each edge $e_{ij}$ in $T$ into a single estimate~$(\\hat{R}_{ij}, \\hat{c}_{ij})$ by projecting their confidence-weighted averages (weights defined in Eq.~\\ref{eq:w_ij}) onto $SO(3)$ and $\\mathbb{S}^2$, respectively:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\hat{R}_{ij} = \\Pi_{SO(3)}\\left(\\sum_q w_{ij}^q R_{ij}^q\\right), \\quad \n\\hat{c}_{ij} = \\Pi_{\\mathbb{S}^2}\\left(\\sum_q w_{ij}^q c_{ij}^q\\right).\n\\end{equation}\nCamera orientations $\\hat{R}_i$ are then recovered by setting one camera's orientation to the identity matrix and propagating through $T$ using the estimates $\\hat{R}_{ij}$. \nFor the task of recovering camera positions from relative positions to be well-posed, the underlying graph must exhibit parallel rigidity, a property we empirically found to be equivalent in many cases to the graph being bi-connected (meaning that if any one node were to be removed the graph will still remain connected). As no tree is bi-connected, the spanning tree $T$ is inadequate for determining the camera positions. We therefore extend $T$ to a bi-connected graph by iteratively adding edges that minimize embedding inconsistency. Finally, using the recovered orientations, we transform each relative position as $\\hat{c}'_{ij} = \\hat{R}^T_j \\hat{c}_{ij}$ to obtain $\\hat{c}'_{ij} \\propto c_i - c_j$, from which absolute positions are recovered using least-unsquared-deviations~\\cite{ozyesil2015stable}.\n\n\\section{Experiments}\n\n\\subsection{Datasets and Setup}\nWe evaluated our method on two datasets (\\textrm{i}) The Overtime Elite (OTE) basketball arena dataset consisting of $46$ calibrated cameras positioned around a basketball court (Figure~\\ref{fig:ote}), representing a real-world sports broadcasting scenario, and (\\textrm{ii}) the IMC Phototourism dataset~\\cite{Jin2020} with $8$ outdoor scenes captured under unconstrained conditions. We used SuperPoint~\\cite{detone2018superpoint} for feature extraction, and SuperGlue~\\cite{sarlin2020superglue} for feature matching. For OTE, we matched each image with its two nearest neighbors from each side, exploiting the ordered camera arrangement. For IMC, we performed exhaustive pairwise matching.\nWe compared against GLOMAP~\\cite{pan2024GLOMAP} for OTE, and against both classical methods (COLMAP, PixSfM~\\cite{schoenberger2016sfm,lindenberger2021pixel}) and learning-based methods (VGGSfM, DFSfM~\\cite{wang2024vggsfm,he2024detector}) for IMC. Following~\\cite{lindenberger2021pixel,sarlin2020superglue}, we report the area under curve~(AUC) of relative orientation errors.\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{ote.png}\n \\caption{\\textbf{OTE Dataset}. Top: Camera placements and poses visualized from two views. Bottom: Example images, captured by three cameras.}\n \\label{fig:ote}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\subsection{Results}\nFor OTE, our method outperforms GLOMAP at $3^\\circ$ and $5^\\circ$ thresholds while remaining competitive at $1^\\circ$, demonstrating the advantage of our planar-aware approach on basketball court scenes, see Table~\\ref{tab:ote_results}. On IMC, we achieve state-of-the-art performance across all thresholds, see Table~\\ref{tab:imc_results}, showing that our method is capable at generalizing well to unconstrained, non-planar scenes.\n\n\\begin{table}\n\\centering\n% \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt} % default is 6pt\n\\caption{Camera pose estimation results on the OTE dataset. Our method achieves better accuracy than GLOMAP at the $3^\\circ$ and $5^\\circ$ thresholds, with comparable performance at $1^\\circ$.}\n\\begin{tabular}{lccc}\n\\hline\n\\textbf{Method} & \\textbf{AUC@1$^\\circ$} & \\textbf{AUC@3$^\\circ$} & \\textbf{AUC@5$^\\circ$} \\\\\n\\hline\nGLOMAP \\cite{pan2024GLOMAP} & \\textbf{67.45} & 84.72 & 91.12 \\\\\nOurs & 67.39 & \\textbf{86.55} & \\textbf{95.55} \\\\\n\\hline\n\\end{tabular}\n\\label{tab:ote_results}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table}\n \\centering\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt} % default is 6pt\n \\caption{Camera pose estimation results on the IMC dataset~\\cite{Jin2020}. Table reproduced from \\cite{wang2024vggsfm}, with the last row (\"Ours\") added.}\\label{tab:imc_results}\n \\begin{tabular}{lccc}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Method} & \\textbf{AUC@3$^\\circ$} & \\textbf{AUC@5$^\\circ$} & \\textbf{AUC@10$^\\circ$} \\\\\n \\midrule\n DeepSFM & 10.27 & 19.36 & 31.35 \\\\\n PoseDiffusion & 12.31 & 23.17 & 36.82 \\\\\n \\midrule\n COLMAP (SIFT+NN) & 23.58 & 32.66 & 44.79 \\\\\n PixSfM (SIFT + NN) & 25.54 & 34.80 & 46.73 \\\\\n PixSfM (LoFTR) & 44.06 & 56.16 & 69.61 \\\\\n PixSfM (SP + SG) & 45.19 & 57.22 & 70.47 \\\\\n DFSfM (LoFTR) & 46.55 & 58.74 & 72.19 \\\\\n \\midrule\n VGGSfM w/o Joint & 38.23 & 51.60 & 68.35 \\\\\n VGGSfM & 45.23 & 58.89 & 73.92 \\\\\n Ours & \\textbf{49.11} & \\textbf{60.32} & \\textbf{76.10} \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\subsection{Ablation Study}\n\\label{sec:Ablation}\nWe evaluated the impact of our method's two key components confidence scoring~(Section~\\ref{subsec:edge_similarity_score}) and graph pruning~(Section~\\ref{subsec:embedding}) on the OTE dataset. To disable confidence scoring we assigned random weights to homographies, and to disable pruning we replaced the minimum range spanning tree with a random spanning tree. We averaged the results over $100$ random seeds. \n\nThe results, shown in Table~\\ref{tab:ablation}, demonstrate that both components are crucial and complementary. Without pruning~(second row in Table~\\ref{tab:ablation}), the underlying graph structure remains unreliable regardless of the weights used. Without proper confidence scores~(third row in Table~\\ref{tab:ablation}), pruning alone provides some benefit but falls short of the full method. The dramatic performance drop when either component is disabled highlights their effectiveness in filtering outliers and reinforcing reliable estimates.\n\n\\begin{table}\n\\caption{Ablation study results on the OTE dataset. Disabling either component leads to significant accuracy drops, demonstrating their complementary roles in outlier rejection.}\n\\label{tab:ablation}\n\\centering\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt} % default is 6pt\n\\begin{tabular}{ccccc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Pruning} & \\textbf{Conf. Scores} & \\textbf{AUC@1$^\\circ$} & \\textbf{AUC@3$^\\circ$} & \\textbf{AUC@5$^\\circ$} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\vmark & \\vmark & 67.39 & 86.55 & 95.55 \\\\\n\\xmark & \\vmark & 3.303 & 11.566 & 17.909 \\\\\n\\vmark & \\xmark & 0.808 & 3.636 & 6.263 \\\\\n\\xmark & \\xmark & 0.434 & 2.646 & 4.910 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\section{Summary}\nWe presented Planar-SfM, a Structure from Motion framework that leverages planar surfaces as geometric constraints rather than viewing them as a limitation. We constructed a pose-graph from homography estimates between image pairs, where each homography provides an independent estimate of relative camera pose through decomposition. To filter unreliable estimates, we applied a spectral embedding approach that maps edges onto the real line based on geometric and visual consistency, enabling extraction of a maximally consistent spanning tree for pose recovery. We demonstrated superior performance on basketball court imagery where traditional epipolar geometry-based methods struggle, while matching or exceeding state-of-the-art results on the IMC Phototourism benchmark for general outdoor scenes.\n\n\n%\\subsubsection{Acknowledgements} xxxx\n\n%\n% ---- Bibliography ----\n%\n% BibTeX users should specify bibliography style 'splncs04'.\n% References will then be sorted and formatted in the correct style.\n%\n\\bibliographystyle{splncs04}\n\\bibliography{bibliography}\n\n\n\\section*{Appendix}\n\\appendix\n\n\\section{Finding the Minimum Range Spanning Tree}\\label{sec:minimal range spanning tree}\n\nAlgorithm~\\ref{alg:MDST} below for finding the minimum range spanning tree of a weighted undirected graph is the solution of Eq.~\\ref{eq:IMOptimProblem}. The idea behind the algorithm for determining such a tree is that there must be an edge weight that is the smallest among all edge weights in the tree. Thus, by fixing a minimum edge weight threshold and constructing a minimum-spanning-tree~\\cite{kruskal1956shortest} that excludes edges with weights below this threshold, we can effectively obtain a minimum-bottleneck-spanning-tree which is a spanning tree in which the heaviest edge is as light as possible. This is because any minimum-spanning-tree is required to contain the edge with the lightest weight in the graph~\\cite{prim1957shortest}. The validity of this method stems from the fact that any minimum-spanning-trees is also a minimum-bottleneck-spanning-tree~\\cite{camerini1978min}, ensuring that the resulting tree will have the lightest possible maximum edge weight.\n\n\\begin{algorithm}\n\t\\caption{Minimum Range Spanning Tree}\\label{alg:MDST}\n\t\\begin{algorithmic}[1]\n\t\t\\State {{\\bfseries Input:} undirected weighted graph $G=\\left(V, E, W=h\\right)$}\n \\State {Sort edges in increasing order of weight $h_1,\\ldots,h_{|E|}$}\n\t\t\\For{$i=1,\\ldots, |E|-(|V|-1)$}\n\t\t% \\Comment{any spanning tree contains $n-1$ edges}\n \\State{$G_i \\gets \\left(V, E=\\{e_i, \\ldots,e_{|E|}\\}, W=\\{h_i, \\ldots,h_{|E|}\\}\\right)$}\n \\If{$G_i$ is not connected}\n \\Break\n\t\t% \\Comment{$h_j \\geq h_j, \\quad \\forall j \\geq i$}\n \\EndIf\n\t\t\\State{$T_i \\gets \\text{minimum-spanning-tree}\\left(G_i\\right)$}\n \\Comment{~\\cite{kruskal1956shortest}}\n \\State{$d_i \\gets \\max_{h \\in E\\left(T_i\\right)} \\{ h\\} - h_i$}\n\t\t% \\Comment{$h_i = \\min_{h \\in E\\left(T_i\\right)} \\{ h\\}$~\\cite{prim1957shortest}}\n\n\t\t\\EndFor\n \\State{$i^{\\ast} \\gets \\argmin_{i} \\{d_i\\}$}\n\t\t\\State {\\bfseries Output:} $T_{i^\\ast}$\n\t\t\\Comment{$T_{i^\\ast}$ is the solution of Eq.~\\ref{eq:IMOptimProblem}}\n\t\\end{algorithmic}\n\\end{algorithm}\n\n\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091180,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31980"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31980"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Meng Chen"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Meng Chen, Anya Ji, Tsung-Han Wu, Tobias Maringgele, David M. Chan, Alane Suhr, Amy Pavel"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"DigitalCoach: Communication and Grounding Gaps in Human and Agentic Computer Use Coaching"},"comments":{"kind":"null"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.CL cs.AI cs.HC"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Agents are increasingly capable of automating software tasks, but can they teach humans how to use software themselves? We introduce DigitalCoach, a multimodal dataset of 72 human expert-novice computer use coaching sessions consisting of 22,752 dialogue turns grounded in 28.1 hours of screen and input event recordings across five software applications. We use DigitalCoach to evaluate whether state-of-the-art models can teach humans how to use computers. Automated evaluation shows that models differ from humans in how they coach: models provide more direct instructions, but fewer explanations, error diagnoses, and knowledge-check questions. When we fix the coaching method, models produce utterances similar to human references yet poorly grounded in visual context. Interactive evaluation confirms that model coaches cause learners to passively follow instructions without deeper engagement and fall short in visual grounding. DigitalCoach lays a foundation for collaborative and proactive computer use coaching agents."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:18:47 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:18:47 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-02"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Chen","Meng",""],["Ji","Anya",""],["Wu","Tsung-Han",""],["Maringgele","Tobias",""],["Chan","David M.",""],["Suhr","Alane",""],["Pavel","Amy",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Chen\",\n \"Meng\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Ji\",\n \"Anya\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Wu\",\n \"Tsung-Han\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Maringgele\",\n \"Tobias\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Chan\",\n \"David M.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Suhr\",\n \"Alane\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Pavel\",\n \"Amy\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: acl.sty\n================================================\n% This is the LaTex style file for *ACL.\n% The official sources can be found at\n%\n% https://github.com/acl-org/acl-style-files/\n%\n% This package is activated by adding\n%\n% \\usepackage{acl}\n%\n% to your LaTeX file. When submitting your paper for review, add the \"review\" option:\n%\n% \\usepackage[review]{acl}\n\n\\newif\\ifacl@finalcopy\n\\newif\\ifacl@anonymize\n\\newif\\ifacl@linenumbers\n\\newif\\ifacl@pagenumbers\n\\DeclareOption{final}{\\acl@finalcopytrue\\acl@anonymizefalse\\acl@linenumbersfalse\\acl@pagenumbersfalse}\n\\DeclareOption{review}{\\acl@finalcopyfalse\\acl@anonymizetrue\\acl@linenumberstrue\\acl@pagenumberstrue}\n\\DeclareOption{preprint}{\\acl@finalcopytrue\\acl@anonymizefalse\\acl@linenumbersfalse\\acl@pagenumberstrue}\n\\ExecuteOptions{final} % final copy is the default\n\n% include hyperref, unless user specifies nohyperref option like this:\n% \\usepackage[nohyperref]{acl}\n\\newif\\ifacl@hyperref\n\\DeclareOption{hyperref}{\\acl@hyperreftrue}\n\\DeclareOption{nohyperref}{\\acl@hyperreffalse}\n\\ExecuteOptions{hyperref} % default is to use hyperref\n\\ProcessOptions\\relax\n\n\\typeout{Conference Style for ACL}\n\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\n\\ifacl@linenumbers\n % Add draft line numbering via the lineno package\n % https://texblog.org/2012/02/08/adding-line-numbers-to-documents/\n \\usepackage[switch,mathlines]{lineno}\n\n % Line numbers in gray Helvetica 8pt\n \\font\\aclhv = phvb at 8pt\n \\renewcommand\\linenumberfont{\\aclhv\\color{lightgray}}\n\n % Zero-fill line numbers\n % NUMBER with left flushed zeros \\fillzeros[<WIDTH>]<NUMBER>\n \\newcount\\cv@tmpc@ \\newcount\\cv@tmpc\n \\def\\fillzeros[#1]#2{\\cv@tmpc@=#2\\relax\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@<0\\cv@tmpc@=-\\cv@tmpc@\\fi\n \\cv@tmpc=1 %\n \\loop\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@<10 \\else \\divide\\cv@tmpc@ by 10 \\advance\\cv@tmpc by 1 \\fi\n \\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@=10\\relax\\cv@tmpc@=11\\relax\\fi \\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@>10 \\repeat\n \\ifnum#2<0\\advance\\cv@tmpc1\\relax-\\fi\n \\loop\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc<#1\\relax0\\advance\\cv@tmpc1\\relax\\fi \\ifnum\\cv@tmpc<#1 \\repeat\n \\cv@tmpc@=#2\\relax\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@<0\\cv@tmpc@=-\\cv@tmpc@\\fi \\relax\\the\\cv@tmpc@}%\n \\renewcommand\\thelinenumber{\\fillzeros[3]{\\arabic{linenumber}}}\n \\AtBeginDocument{\\linenumbers}\n\n \\setlength{\\linenumbersep}{1.6cm}\n\n % Bug: An equation with $$ ... $$ isn't numbered, nor is the previous line.\n\n % Patch amsmath commands so that the previous line and the equation itself\n % are numbered. Bug: multline has an extra line number.\n % https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/461186/how-to-use-lineno-with-amsmath-align\n \\usepackage{etoolbox} %% <- for \\pretocmd, \\apptocmd and \\patchcmd\n\n \\newcommand*\\linenomathpatch[1]{%\n \\expandafter\\pretocmd\\csname #1\\endcsname {\\linenomath}{}{}%\n \\expandafter\\pretocmd\\csname #1*\\endcsname {\\linenomath}{}{}%\n \\expandafter\\apptocmd\\csname end#1\\endcsname {\\endlinenomath}{}{}%\n \\expandafter\\apptocmd\\csname end#1*\\endcsname {\\endlinenomath}{}{}%\n }\n \\newcommand*\\linenomathpatchAMS[1]{%\n \\expandafter\\pretocmd\\csname #1\\endcsname {\\linenomathAMS}{}{}%\n \\expandafter\\pretocmd\\csname #1*\\endcsname {\\linenomathAMS}{}{}%\n \\expandafter\\apptocmd\\csname end#1\\endcsname {\\endlinenomath}{}{}%\n \\expandafter\\apptocmd\\csname end#1*\\endcsname {\\endlinenomath}{}{}%\n }\n\n %% Definition of \\linenomathAMS depends on whether the mathlines option is provided\n \\expandafter\\ifx\\linenomath\\linenomathWithnumbers\n \\let\\linenomathAMS\\linenomathWithnumbers\n %% The following line gets rid of an extra line numbers at the bottom:\n \\patchcmd\\linenomathAMS{\\advance\\postdisplaypenalty\\linenopenalty}{}{}{}\n \\else\n \\let\\linenomathAMS\\linenomathNonumbers\n \\fi\n\n \\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\linenomathpatch{equation}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{gather}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{multline}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{align}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{alignat}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{flalign}%\n }\n\\else\n % Hack to ignore these commands, which review mode puts into the .aux file.\n \\newcommand{\\@LN@col}[1]{}\n \\newcommand{\\@LN}[2]{}\n \\newcommand{\\nolinenumbers}{}\n\\fi\n\n\\PassOptionsToPackage{a4paper,margin=2.5cm,heightrounded=true}{geometry}\n\\RequirePackage{geometry}\n\n\\setlength\\columnsep{0.6cm}\n\\newlength\\titlebox\n\\setlength\\titlebox{11\\baselineskip}\n% \\titlebox should be a multiple of \\baselineskip so that\n% column height remaining fits an exact number of lines of text\n\n\\flushbottom \\twocolumn \\sloppy\n\n% We're never going to need a table of contents, so just flush it to\n% save space --- suggested by drstrip@sandia-2\n\\def\\addcontentsline#1#2#3{}\n\n\\ifacl@pagenumbers\n \\pagenumbering{arabic}\n\\else\n \\thispagestyle{empty}\n \\pagestyle{empty}\n\\fi\n\n%% Title and Authors %%\n\n\\let\\Thanks\\thanks % \\Thanks and \\thanks used to be different, but keep this for backwards compatibility.\n\n\\newcommand\\outauthor{%\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\n \\ifacl@anonymize\n \\bfseries Anonymous ACL submission\n \\else\n \\bfseries\\@author\n \\fi\n \\end{tabular}}\n\n% Mostly taken from deproc.\n\\AtBeginDocument{\n\\def\\maketitle{\\par\n \\begingroup\n \\def\\thefootnote{\\fnsymbol{footnote}}\n \\twocolumn[\\@maketitle]\n \\@thanks\n \\endgroup\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}\n \\let\\maketitle\\relax\n \\let\\@maketitle\\relax\n \\gdef\\@thanks{}\\gdef\\@author{}\\gdef\\@title{}\\let\\thanks\\relax}\n\\def\\@maketitle{\\vbox to \\titlebox{\\hsize\\textwidth\n \\linewidth\\hsize \\vskip 0.125in minus 0.125in \\centering\n {\\Large\\bfseries \\@title \\par} \\vskip 0.2in plus 1fil minus 0.1in\n {\\def\\and{\\unskip\\enspace{\\rmfamily and}\\enspace}%\n \\def\\And{\\end{tabular}\\hss \\egroup \\hskip 1in plus 2fil\n \\hbox to 0pt\\bgroup\\hss \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bfseries}%\n \\def\\AND{\\end{tabular}\\hss\\egroup \\hfil\\hfil\\egroup\n \\vskip 0.25in plus 1fil minus 0.125in\n \\hbox to \\linewidth\\bgroup\\large \\hfil\\hfil\n \\hbox to 0pt\\bgroup\\hss \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bfseries}\n \\hbox to \\linewidth\\bgroup\\large \\hfil\\hfil\n \\hbox to 0pt\\bgroup\\hss\n \\outauthor\n \\hss\\egroup\n \\hfil\\hfil\\egroup}\n \\vskip 0.3in plus 2fil minus 0.1in\n}}\n}\n\n% margins and font size for abstract\n\\renewenvironment{abstract}%\n {\\begin{center}\\large\\textbf{\\abstractname}\\end{center}%\n \\begin{list}{}%\n {\\setlength{\\rightmargin}{0.6cm}%\n \\setlength{\\leftmargin}{0.6cm}}%\n \\item[]\\ignorespaces%\n \\@setsize\\normalsize{12pt}\\xpt\\@xpt\n }%\n {\\unskip\\end{list}}\n\n% Resizing figure and table captions - SL\n% Support for interacting with the caption, subfigure, and subcaption packages - SL\n\\RequirePackage{caption}\n\\DeclareCaptionFont{10pt}{\\fontsize{10pt}{12pt}\\selectfont}\n\\captionsetup{font=10pt}\n\n\\RequirePackage{natbib}\n% for citation commands in the .tex, authors can use:\n% \\citep, \\citet, and \\citeyearpar for compatibility with natbib, or\n% \\cite, \\newcite, and \\shortcite for compatibility with older ACL .sty files\n\\renewcommand\\cite{\\citep} % to get \"(Author Year)\" with natbib\n\\newcommand\\shortcite{\\citeyearpar}% to get \"(Year)\" with natbib\n\\newcommand\\newcite{\\citet} % to get \"Author (Year)\" with natbib\n\\newcommand{\\citeposs}[1]{\\citeauthor{#1}'s (\\citeyear{#1})} % to get \"Author's (Year)\"\n\n\\bibliographystyle{acl_natbib}\n\n% Bibliography\n\n% Don't put a label in the bibliography at all. Just use the unlabeled format\n% instead.\n\\def\\thebibliography#1{\\vskip\\parskip%\n\\vskip\\baselineskip%\n\\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n\\ifx\\@currsize\\normalsize\\@normalsize\\else\\@currsize\\fi%\n\\vskip-\\parskip%\n\\vskip-\\baselineskip%\n\\section*{References\\@mkboth\n {References}{References}}\\list\n {}{\\setlength{\\labelwidth}{0pt}\\setlength{\\leftmargin}{\\parindent}\n \\setlength{\\itemindent}{-\\parindent}}\n \\def\\newblock{\\hskip .11em plus .33em minus -.07em}\n \\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000\n \\sfcode`\\.=1000\\relax}\n\\let\\endthebibliography=\\endlist\n\n\n% Allow for a bibliography of sources of attested examples\n\\def\\thesourcebibliography#1{\\vskip\\parskip%\n\\vskip\\baselineskip%\n\\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n\\ifx\\@currsize\\normalsize\\@normalsize\\else\\@currsize\\fi%\n\\vskip-\\parskip%\n\\vskip-\\baselineskip%\n\\section*{Sources of Attested Examples\\@mkboth\n {Sources of Attested Examples}{Sources of Attested Examples}}\\list\n {}{\\setlength{\\labelwidth}{0pt}\\setlength{\\leftmargin}{\\parindent}\n \\setlength{\\itemindent}{-\\parindent}}\n \\def\\newblock{\\hskip .11em plus .33em minus -.07em}\n \\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000\n \\sfcode`\\.=1000\\relax}\n\\let\\endthesourcebibliography=\\endlist\n\n% sections with less space\n\\def\\section{\\@startsection {section}{1}{\\z@}{-2.0ex plus\n -0.5ex minus -.2ex}{1.5ex plus 0.3ex minus .2ex}{\\large\\bfseries\\raggedright}}\n\\def\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}{-1.8ex plus\n -0.5ex minus -.2ex}{0.8ex plus .2ex}{\\normalsize\\bfseries\\raggedright}}\n%% changed by KO to - values to get the initial parindent right\n\\def\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}{-1.5ex plus\n -0.5ex minus -.2ex}{0.5ex plus .2ex}{\\normalsize\\bfseries\\raggedright}}\n\\def\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}{1.5ex plus\n 0.5ex minus .2ex}{-1em}{\\normalsize\\bfseries}}\n\\def\\subparagraph{\\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\\parindent}{1.5ex plus\n 0.5ex minus .2ex}{-1em}{\\normalsize\\bfseries}}\n\n% Footnotes\n\\footnotesep 6.65pt %\n\\skip\\footins 9pt plus 4pt minus 2pt\n\\def\\footnoterule{\\kern-3pt \\hrule width 5pc \\kern 2.6pt }\n\\setcounter{footnote}{0}\n\n% Lists and paragraphs\n\\parindent 1em\n\\topsep 4pt plus 1pt minus 2pt\n\\partopsep 1pt plus 0.5pt minus 0.5pt\n\\itemsep 2pt plus 1pt minus 0.5pt\n\\parsep 2pt plus 1pt minus 0.5pt\n\n\\leftmargin 2em \\leftmargini\\leftmargin \\leftmarginii 2em\n\\leftmarginiii 1.5em \\leftmarginiv 1.0em \\leftmarginv .5em \\leftmarginvi .5em\n\\labelwidth\\leftmargini\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep \\labelsep 5pt\n\n\\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini}\n\\def\\@listii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginii\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 2pt plus 1pt minus 0.5pt\n \\parsep 1pt plus 0.5pt minus 0.5pt\n \\itemsep \\parsep}\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiii\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 1pt plus 0.5pt minus 0.5pt\n \\parsep \\z@ \\partopsep 0.5pt plus 0pt minus 0.5pt\n \\itemsep \\topsep}\n\\def\\@listiv{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiv\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listv{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginv\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listvi{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginvi\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginvi\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\n\\abovedisplayskip 7pt plus2pt minus5pt%\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus3pt%\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 4pt plus3pt minus3pt%\n\n% Less leading in most fonts (due to the narrow columns)\n% The choices were between 1-pt and 1.5-pt leading\n\\def\\@normalsize{\\@setsize\\normalsize{11pt}\\xpt\\@xpt}\n\\def\\small{\\@setsize\\small{10pt}\\ixpt\\@ixpt}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setsize\\footnotesize{10pt}\\ixpt\\@ixpt}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setsize\\scriptsize{8pt}\\viipt\\@viipt}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setsize\\tiny{7pt}\\vipt\\@vipt}\n\\def\\large{\\@setsize\\large{14pt}\\xiipt\\@xiipt}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setsize\\Large{16pt}\\xivpt\\@xivpt}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setsize\\LARGE{20pt}\\xviipt\\@xviipt}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setsize\\huge{23pt}\\xxpt\\@xxpt}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setsize\\Huge{28pt}\\xxvpt\\@xxvpt}\n\n% The hyperref manual (section 9) says hyperref should be loaded after natbib\n\\ifacl@hyperref\n \\PassOptionsToPackage{breaklinks}{hyperref}\n \\RequirePackage{hyperref}\n % make links dark blue\n \\definecolor{darkblue}{rgb}{0, 0, 0.5}\n \\hypersetup{colorlinks=true, citecolor=darkblue, linkcolor=darkblue, urlcolor=darkblue}\n\\else\n % This definition is used if the hyperref package is not loaded.\n % It provides a backup, no-op definiton of \\href.\n % This is necessary because \\href command is used in the acl_natbib.bst file.\n \\def\\href#1#2{{#2}}\n \\usepackage{url}\n\\fi\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: custom.bib\n================================================\n@book{Aho:72,\n\ttitle = {The Theory of Parsing, Translation and Compiling},\n\tauthor = {Alfred V. Aho and Jeffrey D. Ullman},\n\tyear = 1972,\n\tpublisher = {Prentice-Hall},\n\taddress = {Englewood Cliffs, NJ},\n\tvolume = 1\n}\n@book{APA:83,\n\ttitle = {Publications Manual},\n\tauthor = {{American Psychological Association}},\n\tyear = 1983,\n\tpublisher = {American Psychological Association},\n\taddress = {Washington, DC}\n}\n@article{Chandra:81,\n\ttitle = {Alternation},\n\tauthor = {Ashok K. Chandra and Dexter C. Kozen and Larry J. Stockmeyer},\n\tyear = 1981,\n\tjournal = {Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery},\n\tvolume = 28,\n\tnumber = 1,\n\tpages = {114--133},\n\tdoi = {10.1145/322234.322243}\n}\n@inproceedings{andrew2007scalable,\n\ttitle = {Scalable training of {L1}-regularized log-linear models},\n\tauthor = {Andrew, Galen and Gao, Jianfeng},\n\tyear = 2007,\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning},\n\tpages = {33--40}\n}\n@book{Gusfield:97,\n\ttitle = {Algorithms on Strings, Trees and Sequences},\n\tauthor = {Dan Gusfield},\n\tyear = 1997,\n\tpublisher = {Cambridge University Press},\n\taddress = {Cambridge, UK}\n}\n@article{rasooli-tetrault-2015,\n\ttitle = {Yara Parser: {A} Fast and Accurate Dependency Parser},\n\tauthor = {Mohammad Sadegh Rasooli and Joel R. Tetreault},\n\tyear = 2015,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/1503.06733},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.06733}\n}\n@article{Ando2005,\n\ttitle = {A Framework for Learning Predictive Structures from Multiple Tasks and Unlabeled Data},\n\tauthor = {Ando, Rie Kubota and Zhang, Tong},\n\tyear = 2005,\n\tjournal = {Journal of Machine Learning Research},\n\tpublisher = {JMLR.org},\n\tvolume = 6,\n\tpages = {1817--1853},\n\tissn = {1532-4435},\n\tacmid = 1194905,\n\tissue_date = {12/1/2005},\n\tnumpages = 37\n}\n@incollection{sawyer_cognitive_2022,\n\ttitle = {Cognitive {Apprenticeship}},\n\tauthor = {Collins, Allan and Kapur, Manu},\n\tyear = 2022,\n\tbooktitle = {The {Cambridge} {Handbook} of the {Learning} {Sciences}},\n\tpublisher = {Cambridge University Press},\n\taddress = {Cambridge},\n\tseries = {Cambridge {Handbooks} in {Psychology}},\n\tpages = {156--174},\n\tdoi = {10.1017/9781108888295.010},\n\tisbn = {978-1-108-84098-9},\n\turl = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-the-learning-sciences/cognitive-apprenticeship/6FB3422B7B2F16076F2E082C5C18EAA7},\n\turldate = {2026-03-19},\n\tabstract = {This chapter reviews how people learn during apprenticeships, ways of guiding beginners while they engage in authentic situated activity with more experienced people. Apprenticeship practices are found throughout the world both in cultures with formal schooling and in those without. Traditional apprenticeship practices tend to focus on physical and visible activities, but most schooling is directed toward conceptual learning outcomes which are usually not physical and visible – like formulas in mathematics or theories in physics. This chapter extends apprenticeship research to cognitive apprenticeship, and describes apprenticeships that are designed to lead to abstract or conceptual knowledge. These involve scaffolding, metacognitive reflection, problem-based learning, and situated social practices. Effective apprenticeship often involves productive failure, when learners initially develop potential solutions that are wrong but that can be productively guided toward conceptually correct answers.},\n\tedition = 3,\n\teditor = {Sawyer, R. Keith},\n\tkeywords = {apprenticeship, community of practice, guided participation, modeling, productive failure, situated learning}\n}\n@misc{tomlin_characterizing_2025,\n\ttitle = {Characterizing {Language} {Use} in a {Collaborative} {Situated} {Game}},\n\tauthor = {Tomlin, Nicholas and Zhou, Naitian and Fleisig, Eve and Chen, Liangyuan and Wright, Téa and Vinh, Lauren and Ma, Laura X. and Eisape, Seun and French, Ellie and Du, Tingting and Zhang, Tianjiao and Koller, Alexander and Suhr, Alane},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2512.03381},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03381}\n}\n@misc{yin_vision-as-inverse-graphics_2026,\n\ttitle = {Vision-as-{Inverse}-{Graphics} {Agent} via {Interleaved} {Multimodal} {Reasoning}},\n\tauthor = {Yin, Shaofeng and Ge, Jiaxin and Wang, Zora Zhiruo and Li, Xiuyu and Black, Michael J. and Darrell, Trevor and Kanazawa, Angjoo and Feng, Haiwen},\n\tyear = 2026,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2601.11109},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11109}\n}\n@misc{ahn_answer_2026,\n\ttitle = {From {Answer} {Givers} to {Design} {Mentors}: {Guiding} {LLMs} with the {Cognitive} {Apprenticeship} {Model}},\n\tauthor = {Ahn, Yongsu and Liao, Lejun R. and Bach, Benjamin and Kim, Nam Wook},\n\tyear = 2026,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2601.19053},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19053}\n}\n@article{stolcke_dialogue_2000,\n\ttitle = {Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech},\n\tauthor = {Stolcke, Andreas and Ries, Klaus and Coccaro, Noah and Shriberg, Elizabeth and Bates, Rebecca and Jurafsky, Daniel and Taylor, Paul and Martin, Rachel and Van Ess-Dykema, Carol and Meteer, Marie},\n\tyear = 2000,\n\tjournal = {Computational Linguistics},\n\tpublisher = {MIT Press},\n\taddress = {Cambridge, MA},\n\tvolume = 26,\n\tnumber = 3,\n\tpages = {339--374},\n\turl = {https://aclanthology.org/J00-3003}\n}\n@inproceedings{yang_beyond_2023,\n\ttitle = {Beyond Instructions: {A} Taxonomy of Information Types in How-to Videos},\n\tauthor = {Saelyne Yang and Sangkyung Kwak and Juhoon Lee and Juho Kim},\n\tyear = 2023,\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 2023 {CHI} Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, {CHI} 2023, Hamburg, Germany, April 23-28, 2023},\n\tpublisher = {{ACM}},\n\tpages = {797:1--797:21},\n\tdoi = {10.1145/3544548.3581126},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581126},\n\tbibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org},\n\tbiburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/chi/YangKLK23.bib},\n\teditor = {Albrecht Schmidt and Kaisa V{\\\"{a}}{\\\"{a}}n{\\\"{a}}nen and Tesh Goyal and Per Ola Kristensson and Anicia Peters and Stefanie Mueller and Julie R. Williamson and Max L. Wilson},\n\ttimestamp = {Sat, 29 Apr 2023 01:00:00 +0200}\n}\n@inproceedings{suhr_executing_2019,\n\ttitle = {Executing Instructions in Situated Collaborative Interactions},\n\tauthor = {Suhr, Alane and Yan, Claudia and Schluger, Jack and Yu, Stanley and Khader, Hadi and Mouallem, Marwa and Zhang, Iris and Artzi, Yoav},\n\tyear = 2019,\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)},\n\tpublisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},\n\taddress = {Hong Kong, China},\n\tpages = {2119--2130},\n\tdoi = {10.18653/v1/D19-1218},\n\turl = {https://aclanthology.org/D19-1218},\n\teditor = {Inui, Kentaro and Jiang, Jing and Ng, Vincent and Wan, Xiaojun}\n}\n@article{reece_candor_2023,\n\ttitle = {The {CANDOR} corpus: {Insights} from a large multimodal dataset of naturalistic conversation},\n\tshorttitle = {The {CANDOR} corpus},\n\tauthor = {Reece, Andrew and Cooney, Gus and Bull, Peter and Chung, Christine and Dawson, Bryn and Fitzpatrick, Casey and Glazer, Tamara and Knox, Dean and Liebscher, Alex and Marin, Sebastian},\n\tyear = 2023,\n\tjournal = {Science Advances},\n\tpublisher = {American Association for the Advancement of Science},\n\tvolume = 9,\n\tnumber = 13,\n\tpages = {eadf3197},\n\tdoi = {10.1126/sciadv.adf3197},\n\turl = {https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adf3197},\n\turldate = {2026-04-13},\n\tabstract = {People spend a substantial portion of their lives engaged in conversation, and yet, our scientific understanding of conversation is still in its infancy. Here, we introduce a large, novel, and multimodal corpus of 1656 conversations recorded in spoken English. This 7+ million word, 850-hour corpus totals more than 1 terabyte of audio, video, and transcripts, with moment-to-moment measures of vocal, facial, and semantic expression, together with an extensive survey of speakers’ postconversation reflections. By taking advantage of the considerable scope of the corpus, we explore many examples of how this large-scale public dataset may catalyze future research, particularly across disciplinary boundaries, as scholars from a variety of fields appear increasingly interested in the study of conversation.}\n}\n@inproceedings{yao_tau-bench_2024,\n\ttitle = {\\{\\${\\textbackslash}tau\\$\\}-bench: {A} {Benchmark} for {\\textbackslash}underline\\{{T}\\}ool-{\\textbackslash}underline\\{{A}\\}gent-{\\textbackslash}underline\\{{U}\\}ser {Interaction} in {Real}-{World} {Domains}},\n\tshorttitle = {\\{\\${\\textbackslash}tau\\$\\}-bench},\n\tauthor = {Yao, Shunyu and Shinn, Noah and Razavi, Pedram and Narasimhan, Karthik R.},\n\tyear = 2024,\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the {ICLR} 2025 Conference},\n\turl = {https://openreview.net/forum?id=roNSXZpUDN},\n\turldate = {2026-04-14},\n\tabstract = {Existing benchmarks for language agents do not set them up to interact with human users or follow domain-specific rules, both of which are vital to safe and realistic deployment. We propose \\${\\textbackslash}tau\\$-bench, a benchmark with two domains (retail and airline) emulating dynamic conversations between a user (simulated by language models) and a customer service agent provided with domain-specific API tools and policy guidelines. We employ a efficient and faithful evaluation process that compares the database state at the end of a conversation with the annotated goal state, and propose a new metric (pass{\\textasciicircum}k) to evaluate the reliability of agent behavior over multiple trials. Our experiments show that even state-of-the-art function calling agents (gpt-4o) succeed on \\${\\textless}50{\\textbackslash}\\%\\$ of the tasks, and are terribly inconsistent (pass{\\textasciicircum}8 {\\textless} 25{\\textbackslash}\\% in retail). Our findings point to the need for methods that can improve the ability of agents to act consistently and reliably follow rules.},\n\tlanguage = {en}\n}\n@inproceedings{gasic_pomdp-based_2013,\n\ttitle = {{POMDP}-based dialogue manager adaptation to extended domains},\n\tauthor = {Ga{\\v{s}}i{\\'c}, Milica and Breslin, Catherine and Henderson, Matthew and Kim, Dongho and Szummer, Martin and Thomson, Blaise and Tsiakoulis, Pirros and Young, Steve},\n\tyear = 2013,\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the {SIGDIAL} 2013 Conference},\n\tpublisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},\n\taddress = {Metz, France},\n\tpages = {214--222},\n\turl = {https://aclanthology.org/W13-4035},\n\teditor = {Eskenazi, Maxine and Strube, Michael and Di Eugenio, Barbara and Williams, Jason D.}\n}\n@inproceedings{macina_mathdial_2023,\n\ttitle = {{M}ath{D}ial: A Dialogue Tutoring Dataset with Rich Pedagogical Properties Grounded in Math Reasoning Problems},\n\tauthor = {Macina, Jakub and Daheim, Nico and Chowdhury, Sankalan and Sinha, Tanmay and Kapur, Manu and Gurevych, Iryna and Sachan, Mrinmaya},\n\tyear = 2023,\n\tbooktitle = {Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023},\n\tpublisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},\n\taddress = {Singapore},\n\tpages = {5602--5621},\n\tdoi = {10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.372},\n\turl = {https://aclanthology.org/2023.findings-emnlp.372},\n\teditor = {Bouamor, Houda and Pino, Juan and Bali, Kalika}\n}\n@misc{sharma_convolearn_2026,\n\ttitle = {{ConvoLearn}: {A} {Dataset} of {Constructivist} {Tutor}-{Student} {Dialogue}},\n\tauthor = {Sharma, Mayank and Pea, Roy and Subramonyam, Hari},\n\tyear = 2026,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2601.08950},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08950}\n}\n@misc{macina_mathtutorbench_2025,\n\ttitle = {{MathTutorBench}: {A} {Benchmark} for {Measuring} {Open}-ended {Pedagogical} {Capabilities} of {LLM} {Tutors}},\n\tauthor = {Macina, Jakub and Daheim, Nico and Hakimi, Ido and Kapur, Manu and Gurevych, Iryna and Sachan, Mrinmaya},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2502.18940},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.18940}\n}\n@inproceedings{udagawa_annotated_2020,\n\ttitle = {An Annotated Corpus of Reference Resolution for Interpreting Common Grounding},\n\tauthor = {Takuma Udagawa and Akiko Aizawa},\n\tyear = 2020,\n\tbooktitle = {The Thirty-Fourth {AAAI} Conference on Artificial Intelligence, {AAAI} 2020, The Thirty-Second Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, {IAAI} 2020, The Tenth {AAAI} Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, {EAAI} 2020, New York, NY, USA, February 7-12, 2020},\n\tpublisher = {{AAAI} Press},\n\tpages = {9081--9089},\n\turl = {https://aaai.org/ojs/index.php/AAAI/article/view/6442},\n\tbibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org},\n\tbiburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/aaai/UdagawaA20.bib},\n\ttimestamp = {Tue, 02 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0100}\n}\n@inproceedings{bara_mindcraft_2021,\n\ttitle = {{M}ind{C}raft: Theory of Mind Modeling for Situated Dialogue in Collaborative Tasks},\n\tauthor = {Bara, Cristian-Paul and CH-Wang, Sky and Chai, Joyce},\n\tyear = 2021,\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing},\n\tpublisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},\n\taddress = {Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic},\n\tpages = {1112--1125},\n\tdoi = {10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.85},\n\turl = {https://aclanthology.org/2021.emnlp-main.85},\n\teditor = {Moens, Marie-Francine and Huang, Xuanjing and Specia, Lucia and Yih, Scott Wen-tau}\n}\n@article{lin_decision-oriented_2024,\n\ttitle = {Decision-{Oriented} {Dialogue} for {Human}-{AI} {Collaboration}},\n\tauthor = {Lin, Jessy and Tomlin, Nicholas and Andreas, Jacob and Eisner, Jason},\n\tyear = 2024,\n\tjournal = {Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics},\n\tvolume = 12,\n\tpages = {892--911},\n\tdoi = {10.1162/tacl_a_00679},\n\tissn = {2307-387X},\n\turl = {https://direct.mit.edu/tacl/article/doi/10.1162/tacl_a_00679/123884/Decision-Oriented-Dialogue-for-Human-AI},\n\turldate = {2026-04-14},\n\tabstract = {We describe a class of tasks called decisionoriented dialogues, in which AI assistants such as large language models (LMs) must collaborate with one or more humans via natural language to help them make complex decisions. We formalize three domains in which users face everyday decisions: (1) choosing an assignment of reviewers to conference papers, (2) planning a multi-step itinerary in a city, and (3) negotiating travel plans for a group of friends. In each of these settings, AI assistants and users have disparate abilities that they must combine to arrive at the best decision: Assistants can access and process large amounts of information, while users have preferences and constraints external to the system. For each task, we build a dialogue environment where agents receive a reward based on the quality of the final decision they reach. We evaluate LMs in self-play and in collaboration with humans and find that they fall short compared to human assistants, achieving much lower rewards despite engaging in longer dialogues. We highlight a number of challenges models face in decision-oriented dialogues, ranging from goal-directed behavior to reasoning and optimization, and release our environments as a testbed for future work.},\n\tlanguage = {en}\n}\n@inproceedings{allen2002human,\n\ttitle = {Human-machine collaborative planning},\n\tauthor = {Allen, James and Ferguson, George},\n\tyear = 2002,\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the Third International NASA Workshop on Planning and Scheduling for Space},\n\tpages = {27--29}\n}\n@article{allen_trains_1995,\n\ttitle = {The {TRAINS} project: a case study in building a conversational planning agent},\n\tshorttitle = {The {TRAINS} project},\n\tauthor = {Allen, James F. and Schubert, Lenhart K. and Ferguson, George and Heeman, Peter and Hwang, Chung Hee and Kato, Tsuneaki and Light, Marc and Martin, Nathaniel and Miller, Bradford and Poesio, Massimo and Traum, David R.},\n\tyear = 1995,\n\tjournal = {Journal of Experimental \\& Theoretical Artificial Intelligence},\n\tpublisher = {Taylor \\& Francis},\n\tvolume = 7,\n\tnumber = 1,\n\tpages = {7--48},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/09528139508953799},\n\tissn = {0952-813X},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1080/09528139508953799},\n\turldate = {2026-04-14},\n\tnote = {\\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/09528139508953799},\n\tabstract = {The TRAINS project is an effort to build a conversationally proficient planning assistant. A key part of the project is the construction of the TRAINS system, which provides the research platform for a wide range of issues in natural language understanding, mixed-initiative planning systems, and representing and reasoning about time, actions and events. Four years have now passed since the beginning of the project. Each year a demonstration system has been produced that focused on a dialogue that illustrates particular aspects of the research. The commitment to building complete integrated systems is a significant overhead on the research, but it is considered essential to guarantee that the results constitute real progress in the field. This paper describes the goals of the project, and the experience with the effort so far.}\n}\n@misc{clemens_mixassist_2025,\n\ttitle = {{MixAssist}: {An} {Audio}-{Language} {Dataset} for {Co}-{Creative} {AI} {Assistance} in {Music} {Mixing}},\n\tauthor = {Clemens, Michael and Marasović, Ana},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2507.06329},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06329}\n}\n@inproceedings{xie_osworld_2024,\n\ttitle = {OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments},\n\tauthor = {Tianbao Xie and Danyang Zhang and Jixuan Chen and Xiaochuan Li and Siheng Zhao and Ruisheng Cao and Toh Jing Hua and Zhoujun Cheng and Dongchan Shin and Fangyu Lei and Yitao Liu and Yiheng Xu and Shuyan Zhou and Silvio Savarese and Caiming Xiong and Victor Zhong and Tao Yu},\n\tyear = 2024,\n\tbooktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, December 10 - 15, 2024},\n\turl = {http://papers.nips.cc/paper\\_files/paper/2024/hash/5d413e48f84dc61244b6be550f1cd8f5-Abstract-Datasets\\_and\\_Benchmarks\\_Track.html},\n\tbibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org},\n\tbiburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/nips/XieZCLZCHCSLLXZ24.bib},\n\teditor = {Amir Globersons and Lester Mackey and Danielle Belgrave and Angela Fan and Ulrich Paquet and Jakub M. Tomczak and Cheng Zhang},\n\ttimestamp = {Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0100}\n}\n@inproceedings{noauthor_webarena_nodate,\n\ttitle = {WebArena: {A} Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents},\n\tauthor = {Shuyan Zhou and Frank F. Xu and Hao Zhu and Xuhui Zhou and Robert Lo and Abishek Sridhar and Xianyi Cheng and Tianyue Ou and Yonatan Bisk and Daniel Fried and Uri Alon and Graham Neubig},\n\tyear = 2024,\n\tbooktitle = {The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, {ICLR} 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024},\n\tpublisher = {OpenReview.net},\n\turl = {https://openreview.net/forum?id=oKn9c6ytLx},\n\tbibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org},\n\tbiburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/iclr/ZhouX0ZLSCOBF0N24.bib},\n\ttimestamp = {Wed, 07 Aug 2024 01:00:00 +0200}\n}\n@inproceedings{zhou_webarena_2023,\n\ttitle = {WebArena: {A} Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents},\n\tauthor = {Shuyan Zhou and Frank F. Xu and Hao Zhu and Xuhui Zhou and Robert Lo and Abishek Sridhar and Xianyi Cheng and Tianyue Ou and Yonatan Bisk and Daniel Fried and Uri Alon and Graham Neubig},\n\tyear = 2024,\n\tbooktitle = {The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, {ICLR} 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024},\n\tpublisher = {OpenReview.net},\n\turl = {https://openreview.net/forum?id=oKn9c6ytLx},\n\tbibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org},\n\tbiburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/iclr/ZhouX0ZLSCOBF0N24.bib},\n\ttimestamp = {Wed, 07 Aug 2024 01:00:00 +0200}\n}\n@inproceedings{lin_videogui_nodate,\n\ttitle = {VideoGUI: {A} Benchmark for {GUI} Automation from Instructional Videos},\n\tauthor = {Kevin Qinghong Lin and Linjie Li and Difei Gao and Qinchen Wu and Mingyi Yan and Zhengyuan Yang and Lijuan Wang and Mike Zheng Shou},\n\tyear = 2024,\n\tbooktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, December 10 - 15, 2024},\n\turl = {http://papers.nips.cc/paper\\_files/paper/2024/hash/804e757b7d7043c26701c3a313032101-Abstract-Datasets\\_and\\_Benchmarks\\_Track.html},\n\tbibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org},\n\tbiburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/nips/LinLGWYYWS24.bib},\n\teditor = {Amir Globersons and Lester Mackey and Danielle Belgrave and Angela Fan and Ulrich Paquet and Jakub M. Tomczak and Cheng Zhang},\n\ttimestamp = {Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0100}\n}\n@misc{jang_videowebarena_2025,\n\ttitle = {{VideoWebArena}: {Evaluating} {Long} {Context} {Multimodal} {Agents} with {Video} {Understanding} {Web} {Tasks}},\n\tauthor = {Jang, Lawrence and Li, Yinheng and Zhao, Dan and Ding, Charles and Lin, Justin and Liang, Paul Pu and Bonatti, Rogerio and Koishida, Kazuhito},\n\tyear = 2024,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2410.19100},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19100}\n}\n@inproceedings{shen_task_nodate,\n\ttitle = {Task Completion Agents are Not Ideal Collaborators},\n\tauthor = {Shen, Shannon Zejiang and Chen, Valerie and Gu, Ken and Ross, Alexis and Ma, Zixian and Ross, Jillian and Gu, Alex and Si, Chenglei and Chi, Wayne and Peng, Andi and others},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tbooktitle = {First Workshop on Multi-Turn Interactions in Large Language Models}\n}\n@inproceedings{peng_morae_2025,\n\ttitle = {Morae: {Proactively} {Pausing} {UI} {Agents} for {User} {Choices}},\n\tshorttitle = {Morae},\n\tauthor = {Peng, Yi-Hao and Li, Dingzeyu and Bigham, Jeffrey P and Pavel, Amy},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 38th {Annual} {ACM} {Symposium} on {User} {Interface} {Software} and {Technology}},\n\tpublisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\n\taddress = {New York, NY, USA},\n\tseries = {{UIST} '25},\n\tpages = {1--14},\n\tdoi = {10.1145/3746059.3747797},\n\tisbn = {979-8-4007-2037-6},\n\turl = {https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3746059.3747797},\n\turldate = {2025-11-16},\n\tabstract = {User interface (UI) agents promise to make inaccessible or complex UIs easier to access for blind and low-vision (BLV) users. However, current UI agents typically perform tasks end-to-end without involving users in critical choices or making them aware of important contextual information, thus reducing user agency. For example, in our field study, a BLV participant asked to buy the cheapest available sparkling water, and the agent automatically chose one from several equally priced options, without mentioning alternative products with different flavors or better ratings. To address this problem, we introduce Morae, a UI agent that automatically identifies decision points during task execution and pauses so that users can make choices. Morae uses large multimodal models to interpret user queries alongside UI code and screenshots, and prompt users for clarification when there is a choice to be made. In a study over real-world web tasks with BLV participants, Morae helped users complete more tasks and select options that better matched their preferences, as compared to baseline agents, including OpenAI Operator. More broadly, this work exemplifies a mixed-initiative approach in which users benefit from the automation of UI agents while being able to express their preferences.}\n}\n@misc{yang_guide_2026,\n\ttitle = {{GUIDE}: {A} {Benchmark} for {Understanding} and {Assisting} {Users} in {Open}-{Ended} {GUI} {Tasks}},\n\tauthor = {Yang, Saelyne and Yu, Jaesang and Peng, Yi-Hao and Lin, Kevin Qinghong and Cho, Jae Won and Song, Yale and Kim, Juho},\n\tyear = 2026,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2603.25864},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25864}\n}\n@misc{man_videocad_2025,\n\ttitle = {{VideoCAD}: {A} {Dataset} and {Model} for {Learning} {Long}-{Horizon} {3D} {CAD} {UI} {Interactions} from {Video}},\n\tauthor = {Man, Brandon and Nehme, Ghadi and Alam, Md Ferdous and Ahmed, Faez},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2505.24838},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24838}\n}\n@misc{huq_cowpilot_2025,\n\ttitle = {{CowPilot}: {A} {Framework} for {Autonomous} and {Human}-{Agent} {Collaborative} {Web} {Navigation}},\n\tauthor = {Huq, Faria and Wang, Zora Zhiruo and Xu, Frank F. and Ou, Tianyue and Zhou, Shuyan and Bigham, Jeffrey P. and Neubig, Graham},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2501.16609},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16609}\n}\n@misc{wang_how_2025,\n\ttitle = {How {Do} {AI} {Agents} {Do} {Human} {Work}? {Comparing} {AI} and {Human} {Workflows} {Across} {Diverse} {Occupations}},\n\tauthor = {Wang, Zora Zhiruo and Shao, Yijia and Shaikh, Omar and Fried, Daniel and Neubig, Graham and Yang, Diyi},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2510.22780},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22780}\n}\n@misc{ye_realwebassist_2025,\n\ttitle = {{RealWebAssist}: {A} {Benchmark} for {Long}-{Horizon} {Web} {Assistance} with {Real}-{World} {Users}},\n\tauthor = {Ye, Suyu and Shi, Haojun and Shih, Darren and Yun, Hyokun and Roosta, Tanya and Shu, Tianmin},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2504.10445},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.10445}\n}\n@misc{wang_videoagent_2024,\n\ttitle = {{VideoAgent}: {Long}-form {Video} {Understanding} with {Large} {Language} {Model} as {Agent}},\n\tauthor = {Wang, Xiaohan and Zhang, Yuhui and Zohar, Orr and Yeung-Levy, Serena},\n\tyear = 2024,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2403.10517},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.10517}\n}\n@inproceedings{wang_genartist_2024,\n\ttitle = {GenArtist: Multimodal {LLM} as an Agent for Unified Image Generation and Editing},\n\tauthor = {Zhenyu Wang and Aoxue Li and Zhenguo Li and Xihui Liu},\n\tyear = 2024,\n\tbooktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2024, NeurIPS 2024, Vancouver, BC, Canada, December 10 - 15, 2024},\n\turl = {http://papers.nips.cc/paper\\_files/paper/2024/hash/e7c786024ca718f2487712bfe9f51030-Abstract-Conference.html},\n\tbibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org},\n\tbiburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/nips/WangLLL24.bib},\n\teditor = {Amir Globersons and Lester Mackey and Danielle Belgrave and Angela Fan and Ulrich Paquet and Jakub M. Tomczak and Cheng Zhang},\n\ttimestamp = {Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0100}\n}\n@inproceedings{bunt_iso_nodate,\n\ttitle = {{ISO} 24617-2: A semantically-based standard for dialogue annotation},\n\tauthor = {Bunt, Harry and Alexandersson, Jan and Choe, Jae-Woong and Fang, Alex Chengyu and Hasida, Koiti and Petukhova, Volha and Popescu-Belis, Andrei and Traum, David},\n\tyear = 2012,\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation ({LREC}'12)},\n\tpublisher = {European Language Resources Association (ELRA)},\n\taddress = {Istanbul, Turkey},\n\tpages = {430--437},\n\turl = {http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2012/pdf/530_Paper.pdf},\n\teditor = {Calzolari, Nicoletta and Choukri, Khalid and Declerck, Thierry and Do{\\u{g}}an, Mehmet U{\\u{g}}ur and Maegaard, Bente and Mariani, Joseph and Moreno, Asuncion and Odijk, Jan and Piperidis, Stelios}\n}\n@article{tian_learners_2025,\n\ttitle = {Learners' {AI} dependence and critical thinking: {The} psychological mechanism of fatigue and the social buffering role of {AI} literacy},\n\tshorttitle = {Learners' {AI} dependence and critical thinking},\n\tauthor = {Tian, Jinrui and Zhang, Ronghua},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tjournal = {Acta Psychologica},\n\tvolume = 260,\n\tpages = 105725,\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105725},\n\tissn = {0001-6918},\n\turl = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825010388},\n\turldate = {2026-04-24},\n\tabstract = {With the growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, understanding its cognitive implications has become increasingly important. This study examines how university students' AI dependence influences their critical thinking, exploring cognitive fatigue as a mediating mechanism and information literacy as a moderating factor. Data were collected from 580 Chinese university students, and a moderated mediation model (PROCESS Model 8) was tested. Results indicated that greater AI dependence was associated with lower levels of critical thinking, with cognitive fatigue partially mediating this relationship. Information literacy buffered the negative impact of AI dependence on critical thinking but also amplified cognitive fatigue when AI reliance was high. These findings extend theories of cognitive offloading and automation bias by revealing the dual role of information literacy in AI-supported learning. Practical implications include the need for digital literacy programs and instructional designs that manage cognitive fatigue in AI-integrated education.},\n\tkeywords = {AI dependence, Cognitive fatigue, Critical thinking, Information literacy}\n}\n@misc{gmeiner_prototyping_2025,\n\ttitle = {Prototyping {Multimodal} {GenAI} {Real}-{Time} {Agents} with {Counterfactual} {Replays} and {Hybrid} {Wizard}-of-{Oz}},\n\tauthor = {Gmeiner, Frederic and Holstein, Kenneth and Martelaro, Nikolas},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2510.06872},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06872}\n}\n@misc{huh_vid2coach_2025,\n\ttitle = {{Vid2Coach}: {Transforming} {How}-{To} {Videos} into {Task} {Assistants}},\n\tauthor = {Huh, Mina and Xue, Zihui and Das, Ujjaini and Ashutosh, Kumar and Grauman, Kristen and Pavel, Amy},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2506.00717},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00717}\n}\n@inproceedings{core_coding_1997,\n\ttitle = {Coding dialogs with the DAMSL annotation scheme},\n\tauthor = {Core, Mark G and Allen, James},\n\tyear = 1997,\n\tbooktitle = {AAAI fall symposium on communicative action in humans and machines},\n\tvolume = 56,\n\tpages = {28--35},\n\torganization = {Boston, MA}\n}\n@article{fleiss_equivalence_1973,\n\ttitle = {The {Equivalence} of {Weighted} {Kappa} and the {Intraclass} {Correlation} {Coefficient} as {Measures} of {Reliability}},\n\tauthor = {Fleiss, Joseph L. and Cohen, Jacob},\n\tyear = 1973,\n\tjournal = {Educational and Psychological Measurement},\n\tpublisher = {SAGE Publications Inc},\n\tvolume = 33,\n\tnumber = 3,\n\tpages = {613--619},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/001316447303300309},\n\tissn = {0013-1644},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447303300309},\n\turldate = {2026-05-02},\n\tlanguage = {EN}\n}\n@misc{openai_introducing_2026,\n\ttitle = {Introducing {GPT}-5.4},\n\tauthor = {OpenAI},\n\tyear = 2026,\n\tjournal = {OpenAI},\n\turl = {https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-4/},\n\turldate = {2026-05-05},\n\tabstract = {Introducing GPT-5.4, OpenAI’s most most capable and efficient frontier model for professional work, with state-of-the-art coding, computer use, tool search, and 1M-token context.},\n\tlanguage = {en-US}\n}\n@misc{openai_gpt5.4mini_2026,\n\ttitle = {Introducing {GPT}-5.4 mini and nano},\n\tauthor = {OpenAI},\n\tyear = 2026,\n\tjournal = {OpenAI},\n\turl = {https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-4-mini-and-nano/},\n\turldate = {2026-05-08},\n\tabstract = {GPT-5.4 mini and nano are smaller, faster versions of GPT-5.4 optimized for coding, tool use, multimodal reasoning, and high-volume API and sub-agent workloads.},\n\tlanguage = {en-US}\n}\n@misc{noauthor_gemini_nodate,\n\ttitle = {Gemini 3.1 {Pro}},\n\tauthor = {Google},\n\tyear = 2026,\n\tjournal = {Google DeepMind},\n\turl = {https://deepmind.google/models/gemini/pro/},\n\turldate = {2026-05-08},\n\tabstract = {Best for complex tasks and bringing creative concepts to life},\n\tlanguage = {en}\n}\n@misc{noauthor_qwen_nodate,\n\ttitle = {Qwen},\n\tauthor = {Qwen},\n\tyear = 2026,\n\turl = {https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.5},\n\turldate = {2026-05-08}\n}\n@inproceedings{liu_revisiting_2023,\n\ttitle = {Revisiting the Gold Standard: Grounding Summarization Evaluation with Robust Human Evaluation},\n\tauthor = {Liu, Yixin and Fabbri, Alex and Liu, Pengfei and Zhao, Yilun and Nan, Linyong and Han, Ruilin and Han, Simeng and Joty, Shafiq and Wu, Chien-Sheng and Xiong, Caiming and Radev, Dragomir},\n\tyear = 2023,\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)},\n\tpublisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},\n\taddress = {Toronto, Canada},\n\tpages = {4140--4170},\n\tdoi = {10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.228},\n\turl = {https://aclanthology.org/2023.acl-long.228},\n\teditor = {Rogers, Anna and Boyd-Graber, Jordan and Okazaki, Naoaki}\n}\n@inproceedings{mohanbabu_a11y-cua_2026,\n\ttitle = {A11y-{CUA} {Dataset}: {Characterizing} the {Accessibility} {Gap} in {Computer} {Use} {Agents}},\n\tauthor = {Mohanbabu, Ananya Gubbi and Natalie, Rosiana and Kim, Brandon and Guo, Anhong and Pavel, Amy},\n\tyear = 2026,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2602.09310},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09310}\n}\n@article{heldner_pauses_2010,\n\ttitle = {Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations},\n\tauthor = {Heldner, Mattias and Edlund, Jens},\n\tyear = 2010,\n\tjournal = {Journal of Phonetics},\n\tvolume = 38,\n\tnumber = 4,\n\tpages = {555--568},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.002},\n\tissn = {00954470},\n\turl = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0095447010000628},\n\turldate = {2026-05-11},\n\tabstract = {This paper explores durational aspects of pauses, gaps and overlaps in three different conversational corpora with a view to challenge claims about precision timing in turn-taking. Distributions of pause, gap and overlap durations in conversations are presented, and methodological issues regarding the statistical treatment of such distributions are discussed. The results are related to published minimal response times for spoken utterances and thresholds for detection of acoustic silences in speech. It is shown that turn-taking is generally less precise than is often claimed by researchers in the field of conversation analysis or interactional linguistics. These results are discussed in the light of their implications for models of timing in turn-taking, and for interaction control models in speech technology. In particular, it is argued that the proportion of speaker changes that could potentially be triggered by information immediately preceding the speaker change is large enough for reactive interaction controls models to be viable in speech technology.},\n\tlanguage = {en}\n}\n@inproceedings{chan_clair_2023,\n\ttitle = {{CLAIR}: Evaluating Image Captions with Large Language Models},\n\tauthor = {Chan, David and Petryk, Suzanne and Gonzalez, Joseph and Darrell, Trevor and Canny, John},\n\tyear = 2023,\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing},\n\tpublisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},\n\taddress = {Singapore},\n\tpages = {13638--13646},\n\tdoi = {10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.841},\n\turl = {https://aclanthology.org/2023.emnlp-main.841},\n\teditor = {Bouamor, Houda and Pino, Juan and Bali, Kalika}\n}\n@misc{noauthor_llama_nodate,\n\ttitle = {The {Llama} 4 herd: {The} beginning of a new era of natively multimodal {AI} innovation},\n\tauthor = {Meta},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\turl = {https://ai.meta.com/blog/llama-4-multimodal-intelligence/},\n\turldate = {2026-05-13}\n}\n@article{zhang_proactive_2025,\n\ttitle = {Proactive {Assistant} {Dialogue} {Generation} from {Streaming} {Egocentric} {Videos}},\n\tauthor = {Zhang, Yichi and Dong, Xin Luna and Lin, Zhaojiang and Madotto, Andrea and Kumar, Anuj and Damavandi, Babak and Chai, Joyce and Moon, Seungwhan},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2506.05904},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05904}\n}\n@inproceedings{levinboim_quality_2021,\n\ttitle = {Quality Estimation for Image Captions Based on Large-scale Human Evaluations},\n\tauthor = {Levinboim, Tomer and Thapliyal, Ashish V. and Sharma, Piyush and Soricut, Radu},\n\tyear = 2021,\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies},\n\tpublisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},\n\taddress = {Online},\n\tpages = {3157--3166},\n\tdoi = {10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.253},\n\turl = {https://aclanthology.org/2021.naacl-main.253},\n\teditor = {Toutanova, Kristina and Rumshisky, Anna and Zettlemoyer, Luke and Hakkani-Tur, Dilek and Beltagy, Iz and Bethard, Steven and Cotterell, Ryan and Chakraborty, Tanmoy and Zhou, Yichao}\n}\n@misc{howtodiv_2025,\n\ttitle = {Generating Dialogues from Egocentric Instructional Videos for Task Assistance: Dataset, Method and Benchmark},\n\tauthor = {Lavisha Aggarwal and Vikas Bahirwani and Lin Li and Andrea Colaco},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2508.11192},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11192}\n}\n@inproceedings{padmakumar2022teach,\n\ttitle = {TEACh: Task-Driven Embodied Agents That Chat},\n\tauthor = {Aishwarya Padmakumar and Jesse Thomason and Ayush Shrivastava and Patrick Lange and Anjali Narayan{-}Chen and Spandana Gella and Robinson Piramuthu and G{\\\"{o}}khan T{\\\"{u}}r and Dilek Hakkani{-}T{\\\"{u}}r},\n\tyear = 2022,\n\tbooktitle = {Thirty-Sixth {AAAI} Conference on Artificial Intelligence, {AAAI} 2022, Thirty-Fourth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, {IAAI} 2022, The Twelveth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, {EAAI} 2022 Virtual Event, February 22 - March 1, 2022},\n\tpublisher = {{AAAI} Press},\n\tpages = {2017--2025},\n\turl = {https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/20097},\n\tbibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org},\n\tbiburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/aaai/PadmakumarTSLNG22.bib},\n\ttimestamp = {Mon, 11 Jul 2022 01:00:00 +0200}\n}\n@article{bhattacharyya2026can,\n\ttitle = {Can Multi-Modal LLMs Provide Live Step-by-Step Task Guidance?},\n\tauthor = {Bhattacharyya, Apratim and Xu, Bicheng and Haresh, Sanjay and Pourreza, Reza and Liu, Litian and Panchal, Sunny and Sigal, Leonid and Memisevic, Roland},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tjournal = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n\tvolume = 38,\n\tpages = {22377--22410}\n}\n@inproceedings{kim2019codraw,\n\ttitle = {{C}o{D}raw: Collaborative Drawing as a Testbed for Grounded Goal-driven Communication},\n\tauthor = {Kim, Jin-Hwa and Kitaev, Nikita and Chen, Xinlei and Rohrbach, Marcus and Zhang, Byoung-Tak and Tian, Yuandong and Batra, Dhruv and Parikh, Devi},\n\tyear = 2019,\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics},\n\tpublisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},\n\taddress = {Florence, Italy},\n\tpages = {6495--6513},\n\tdoi = {10.18653/v1/P19-1651},\n\turl = {https://aclanthology.org/P19-1651},\n\teditor = {Korhonen, Anna and Traum, David and M{\\`a}rquez, Llu{\\'\\i}s}\n}\n@inproceedings{nakae2025task,\n\ttitle = {Task Proficiency-Aware Dialogue Analysis in a Real-Time Cooking Game Environment},\n\tauthor = {Nakae, Kaito and Inaba, Michimasa},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue},\n\tpages = {764--779}\n}\n@inproceedings{montahaei_jointly_2019,\n\ttitle = {Jointly Measuring Diversity and Quality in Text Generation Models},\n\tauthor = {Alihosseini, Danial and Montahaei, Ehsan and Soleymani Baghshah, Mahdieh},\n\tyear = 2019,\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop on Methods for Optimizing and Evaluating Neural Language Generation},\n\tpublisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},\n\taddress = {Minneapolis, Minnesota},\n\tpages = {90--98},\n\tdoi = {10.18653/v1/W19-2311},\n\turl = {https://aclanthology.org/W19-2311},\n\teditor = {Bosselut, Antoine and Celikyilmaz, Asli and Ghazvininejad, Marjan and Iyer, Srinivasan and Khandelwal, Urvashi and Rashkin, Hannah and Wolf, Thomas}\n}\n@misc{friedman_vendi_2023,\n\ttitle = {The {Vendi} {Score}: {A} {Diversity} {Evaluation} {Metric} for {Machine} {Learning}},\n\tauthor = {Friedman, Dan and Dieng, Adji Bousso},\n\tyear = 2022,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2210.02410},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02410}\n}\n@article{menendez_jensen-shannon_1997,\n\ttitle = {The {Jensen}-{Shannon} divergence},\n\tauthor = {Menéndez, M. L. and Pardo, J. A. and Pardo, L. and Pardo, M. C.},\n\tyear = 1997,\n\tjournal = {Journal of the Franklin Institute},\n\tvolume = 334,\n\tnumber = 2,\n\tpages = {307--318},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/S0016-0032(96)00063-4},\n\tissn = {0016-0032},\n\turl = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016003296000634},\n\turldate = {2026-05-18},\n\tabstract = {In this paper we investigate the Jensen-Shannon parametric divergence for testing goodness-of-fit for point estimation. Most of the work presented is an analytical study of the asymptotic differences between different members of the family proposed in goodness of fit, together with an examination of closer approximations to the exact distribution of these statistics than the commonly used chi-squared distribution. Finally the minimum Jensen-Shannon divergence estimates are introduced and compared with other well-known estimators by computer simulation.}\n}\n@misc{noauthor_assistgui_nodate,\n\ttitle = {{AssistGUI}: {Task}-{Oriented} {Desktop} {Graphical} {User} {Interface} {Automation}},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/html/2312.13108v2},\n\turldate = {2026-05-18}\n}\n@inproceedings{pillutla_mauve_2021,\n\ttitle = {{MAUVE:} Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontiers},\n\tauthor = {Krishna Pillutla and Swabha Swayamdipta and Rowan Zellers and John Thickstun and Sean Welleck and Yejin Choi and Za{\\\"{\\i}}d Harchaoui},\n\tyear = 2021,\n\tbooktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2021, NeurIPS 2021, December 6-14, 2021, virtual},\n\tpages = {4816--4828},\n\turl = {https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2021/hash/260c2432a0eecc28ce03c10dadc078a4-Abstract.html},\n\tbibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org},\n\tbiburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/nips/PillutlaSZTWCH21.bib},\n\teditor = {Marc'Aurelio Ranzato and Alina Beygelzimer and Yann N. Dauphin and Percy Liang and Jennifer Wortman Vaughan},\n\ttimestamp = {Tue, 03 May 2022 01:00:00 +0200}\n}\n@inproceedings{gao_assistgui_2024,\n\ttitle = {AssistGUI: Task-Oriented {PC} Graphical User Interface Automation},\n\tauthor = {Difei Gao and Lei Ji and Zechen Bai and Mingyu Ouyang and Peiran Li and Dongxing Mao and Qinchen Wu and Weichen Zhang and Peiyi Wang and Xiangwu Guo and Hengxu Wang and Luowei Zhou and Mike Zheng Shou},\n\tyear = 2024,\n\tbooktitle = {{IEEE/CVF} Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, {CVPR} 2024, Seattle, WA, USA, June 16-22, 2024},\n\tpublisher = {{IEEE}},\n\tpages = {13289--13298},\n\tdoi = {10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01262},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01262},\n\tbibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org},\n\tbiburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/cvpr/Gao0BOLMWZWGWZS24.bib},\n\ttimestamp = {Wed, 02 Oct 2024 01:00:00 +0200}\n}\n@misc{bai_qwen3-vl_2025,\n\ttitle = {Qwen3-{VL} {Technical} {Report}},\n\tauthor = {Bai, Shuai and Cai, Yuxuan and Chen, Ruizhe and Chen, Keqin and Chen, Xionghui and Cheng, Zesen and Deng, Lianghao and Ding, Wei and Gao, Chang and Ge, Chunjiang and Ge, Wenbin and Guo, Zhifang and Huang, Qidong and Huang, Jie and Huang, Fei and Hui, Binyuan and Jiang, Shutong and Li, Zhaohai and Li, Mingsheng and Li, Mei and Li, Kaixin and Lin, Zicheng and Lin, Junyang and Liu, Xuejing and Liu, Jiawei and Liu, Chenglong and Liu, Yang and Liu, Dayiheng and Liu, Shixuan and Lu, Dunjie and Luo, Ruilin and Lv, Chenxu and Men, Rui and Meng, Lingchen and Ren, Xuancheng and Ren, Xingzhang and Song, Sibo and Sun, Yuchong and Tang, Jun and Tu, Jianhong and Wan, Jianqiang and Wang, Peng and Wang, Pengfei and Wang, Qiuyue and Wang, Yuxuan and Xie, Tianbao and Xu, Yiheng and Xu, Haiyang and Xu, Jin and Yang, Zhibo and Yang, Mingkun and Yang, Jianxin and Yang, An and Yu, Bowen and Zhang, Fei and Zhang, Hang and Zhang, Xi and Zheng, Bo and Zhong, Humen and Zhou, Jingren and Zhou, Fan and Zhou, Jing and Zhu, Yuanzhi and Zhu, Ke},\n\tyear = 2025,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2511.21631},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21631}\n}\n@misc{guo_benchmarking_2024,\n\ttitle = {Benchmarking {Linguistic} {Diversity} of {Large} {Language} {Models}},\n\tauthor = {Guo, Yanzhu and Shang, Guokan and Clavel, Chloé},\n\tyear = 2024,\n\tjournal = {ArXiv preprint},\n\tvolume = {abs/2412.10271},\n\turl = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10271}\n}\n@article{cohen1960coefficient,\n\ttitle = {A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales},\n\tauthor = {Cohen, Jacob},\n\tyear = 1960,\n\tjournal = {Educational and psychological measurement},\n\tpublisher = {Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA},\n\tvolume = 20,\n\tnumber = 1,\n\tpages = {37--46}\n}\n\n@misc{shen_completion_2025,\n title = {Completion \\${\\textbackslash}neq\\$ {Collaboration}: {Scaling} {Collaborative} {Effort} with {Agents}},\n shorttitle = {Completion \\${\\textbackslash}neq\\$ {Collaboration}},\n url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25744},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2510.25744},\n abstract = {Current evaluations of agents remain centered around one-shot task completion, failing to account for the inherently iterative and collaborative nature of many real-world problems, where human goals are often underspecified and evolve. We argue for a shift from building and assessing task completion agents to developing collaborative agents, assessed not only by the quality of their final outputs but by how well they engage with and enhance human effort throughout the problem-solving process. To support this shift, we introduce collaborative effort scaling, a framework that captures how an agent's utility grows with increasing user involvement. Through case studies and simulated evaluations, we show that state-of-the-art agents often underperform in multi-turn, real-world scenarios, revealing a missing ingredient in agent design: the ability to sustain engagement and scaffold user understanding. Collaborative effort scaling offers a lens for diagnosing agent behavior and guiding development toward more effective interactions.},\n urldate = {2026-05-26},\n publisher = {arXiv},\n author = {Shen, Shannon Zejiang and Chen, Valerie and Gu, Ken and Ross, Alexis and Ma, Zixian and Ross, Jillian and Gu, Alex and Si, Chenglei and Chi, Wayne and Peng, Andi and Shen, Jocelyn J. and Talwalkar, Ameet and Wu, Tongshuang and Sontag, David},\n month = oct,\n year = {2025},\n note = {arXiv:2510.25744 [cs.CL]},\n keywords = {Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science - Computation and Language},\n}\n@inproceedings{shaikh2024grounding,\n title={Grounding gaps in language model generations},\n author={Shaikh, Omar and Gligori{\\'c}, Kristina and Khetan, Ashna and Gerstgrasser, Matthias and Yang, Diyi and Jurafsky, Dan},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers)},\n pages={6279--6296},\n year={2024}\n}\n@inproceedings{chan2022s,\n title={What's in a Caption? Dataset-Specific Linguistic Diversity and Its Effect on Visual Description Models and Metrics},\n author={Chan, David M and Myers, Austin and Vijayanarasimhan, Sudheendra and Ross, David A and Seybold, Bryan and Canny, John F},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={4740--4749},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{Gao2024EmpoweringBDA,\n title={Empowering biomedical discovery with AI agents},\n author={Shanghua Gao and Ada Fang and Yepeng Huang and Valentina Giunchiglia and Ayush Noori and J. Schwarz and Yasha Ektefaie and Jovana Kondic and M. Zitnik},\n journal={Cell},\n year={2024},\n volume={187 22},\n pages={\n 6125-6151\n },\n url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusId:268875818}\n}\n\n@misc{hua_talk_2024,\n title = {Talk {Less}, {Interact} {Better}: {Evaluating} {In}-context {Conversational} {Adaptation} in {Multimodal} {LLMs}},\n shorttitle = {Talk {Less}, {Interact} {Better}},\n url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.01417},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2408.01417},\n abstract = {Humans spontaneously use increasingly efficient language as interactions progress, by adapting and forming ad-hoc conventions. This phenomenon has been studied extensively using reference games, showing properties of human language that go beyond relaying intents. It remains unexplored whether multimodal large language models (MLLMs) similarly increase communication efficiency during interactions, and what mechanisms they may adopt for this purpose. We introduce ICCA, an automated framework to evaluate such conversational adaptation as an in-context behavior in MLLMs. We evaluate several state-of-the-art MLLMs, and observe that while they may understand the increasingly efficient language of their interlocutor, they do not spontaneously make their own language more efficient over time. This latter ability can only be elicited in some models (e.g., GPT-4) with heavy-handed prompting. This shows that this property of linguistic interaction does not arise from current training regimes, even though it is a common hallmark of human language. ICCA is available at https://github.com/lil-lab/ICCA.},\n urldate = {2026-05-26},\n publisher = {arXiv},\n author = {Hua, Yilun and Artzi, Yoav},\n month = aug,\n year = {2024},\n note = {arXiv:2408.01417 [cs.CL]},\n keywords = {Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science - Computation and Language, Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Science - Machine Learning},\n}\n\n@misc{Claude4.6,\n author = {{Anthropic}},\n title = {Claude 4.6},\n year = {2026},\n url = {https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-sonnet-4-6},\n note = {Accessed: Jun 12, 2026}\n}\n\n================================================\nFILE: macros.tex\n================================================\n\\newcommand{\\system}{\\textsc{DigitalCoach}}\n\\newcommand{\\placeholder}[1]{\\textit{\\textcolor{gray}{[#1]}}}\n\\newcommand{\\action}[1]{\\textit{\\textcolor{blue}{[#1]}}}\n\\newcommand{\\duration}{28.1}\n\\newcommand{\\avgduration}{22.5 min}\n\\newcommand{\\minduration}{3 min 53 sec}\n\\newcommand{\\maxduration}{1 hour 16 min 16 sec}\n\\newcommand{\\turns}{22,752}\n\\newcommand{\\sessions}{72}\n\\newcommand{\\nevents}{39,609}\n\\newcommand{\\nfiles}{36,724}\n\n\\newcolumntype{C}{>{\\centering\\arraybackslash}X}\n\n\\usepackage{pifont}\n\\usepackage{makecell}\n\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{pifont}\n\\newcommand{\\cmark}{\\textcolor{green!55!black}{\\ding{51}}}\n\\newcommand{\\xmark}{\\textcolor{red!55!black}{\\ding{55}}}\n\n\\usepackage{silence}\n\\WarningFilter{latex}{Command \\showhyphens has changed}\n\n% Spacing\n\\renewcommand{\\paragraph}[1]{\\vspace{0.25em}\\noindent\\textbf{#1}}\n\n% Subtle float spacing reductions\n\\setlength{\\textfloatsep}{10pt plus 2pt minus 2pt} % space between top/bottom floats and text\n\\setlength{\\floatsep}{8pt plus 2pt minus 2pt} % space between two floats\n\\setlength{\\intextsep}{8pt plus 2pt minus 2pt} % space around in-text floats\n\n% Header spacing\n\\makeatletter\n\\def\\@secpenalty{-300}\n\\makeatother\n\\makeatletter\n\\renewcommand{\\@afterheading}{%\n \\@nobreakfalse\n \\everypar{%\n \\if@nobreak\n \\@nobreakfalse\n \\clubpenalty 50\n \\else\n \\clubpenalty \\@clubpenalty\n \\everypar{}%\n \\fi}}\n\\makeatother\n\n% Toggle this:\n\\newif\\ifshowcomments\n% \\showcommentstrue % show comments\n\\showcommentsfalse % hide comments\n\n\\definecolor{meng}{RGB}{245, 129, 66}\n\\definecolor{amy}{RGB}{30, 130, 130}\n\\definecolor{david}{RGB}{180, 120, 20}\n\n\\ifshowcomments\n \\newcommand{\\meng}[1]{\\textcolor{meng}{\\textbf{Meng:} #1}}\n \\newcommand{\\amy}[1]{\\textcolor{amy}{\\textbf{Amy:} #1}}\n \\newcommand{\\anya}[1]{\\textcolor{blue}{\\textbf{Anya:} #1}}\n \\newcommand{\\tobi}[1]{\\textcolor{blue}{\\textbf{Tobi:} #1}}\n \\newcommand{\\david}[1]{\\textcolor{david}{\\textbf{David:} #1}}\n \\newcommand{\\as}[1]{\\textcolor{green}{\\textbf{Alane:} #1}}\n\\else\n \\newcommand{\\meng}[1]{}\n \\newcommand{\\amy}[1]{}\n \\newcommand{\\anya}[1]{}\n \\newcommand{\\tobi}[1]{}\n \\newcommand{\\david}[1]{}\n \\newcommand{\\as}[1]{}\n\\fi\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[11pt]{article}\n\n% Change \"review\" to \"final\" to generate the final (sometimes called camera-ready) version.\n% Change to \"preprint\" to generate a non-anonymous version with page numbers.\n% \\usepackage[review]{acl}\n\\usepackage[preprint]{acl}\n\n% \\usepackage[moderate]{savetrees}\n\n\\usepackage{times}\n\\usepackage{latexsym}\n\\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}\n\\usepackage{microtype}\n\\usepackage{inconsolata}\n\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{adjustbox}\n\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{multirow}\n\\usepackage{tabularx}\n\\usepackage{xltabular}\n\\usepackage{array}\n\\usepackage{ragged2e}\n\\usepackage{enumitem}\n\n\\usepackage[table]{xcolor}\n\\usepackage[most]{tcolorbox}\n\\usepackage{caption}\n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\usepackage{pdfpages}\n\\usepackage{placeins}\n\n\\definecolor{turnblue}{RGB}{225,239,250}\n\\definecolor{turncream}{RGB}{253,244,231}\n\\definecolor{linegray}{RGB}{190,190,190}\n\n\\newcolumntype{N}{>{\\centering\\arraybackslash\\color{gray}}p{0.42cm}}\n\\newcolumntype{S}{>{\\centering\\arraybackslash}p{0.52cm}}\n\\newcolumntype{Y}{>{\\raggedright\\arraybackslash}X}\n\n\\newtcolorbox{promptbox}[2][]{\n colback=gray!5!white,\n colframe=gray!80!black,\n coltitle=black,\n fonttitle=\\bfseries\\sffamily,\n title={#2},\n boxrule=0.5pt,\n arc=3pt,\n left=8pt, right=8pt, top=8pt, bottom=8pt,\n breakable,\n #1\n}\n\n\\input{macros}\n\n\n\\title{\\system{}: Communication and Grounding Gaps in\\\\ Human and Agentic Computer Use Coaching}\n\n\n\\author{\n\\textbf{Meng Chen}$^{1}$,\n\\textbf{Anya Ji}$^{1}$,\n\\textbf{Tsung-Han Wu}$^{1}$,\n\\textbf{Tobias Maringgele}$^{2}$\\thanks{Work done at UC Berkeley as a visiting student.}, \\\\\n\\textbf{David M. Chan}$^{1}$,\n\\textbf{Alane Suhr}$^{1}$\\thanks{Equal supervision.},\n\\textbf{Amy Pavel}$^{1}$\\footnotemark[2] \\\\\n$^{1}$University of California, Berkeley \\quad\n$^{2}$Technical University of Munich\n}\n\n\n\\begin{document}\n\\maketitle\n\n\\begin{abstract}\nAgents are increasingly capable of automating software tasks, but can they teach humans how to use software themselves?\nWe introduce \\textbf{\\system{}}, a multimodal dataset of 72 human expert-novice computer use coaching sessions consisting of 22,752 dialogue turns grounded in 28.1 hours of screen and input event recordings across 5 software applications.\nWe then use \\system{} to evaluate whether state-of-the-art models can teach humans how to use computers.\nOur automated evaluation shows that models differ from humans in how they coach: models provide more direct instructions, but fewer explanations, error diagnoses and knowledge-check questions. \nWhen we fix the coaching method, models produce utterances that are similar to human references, but poorly grounded in visual context.\nOur interactive evaluation confirms that model coaches cause learners to passively follow instructions without deeper engagement and fall short in visual grounding. \\system{} lays a foundation for collaborative and proactive computer use coaching agents. Data and code are available at \\url{https://project-digital-coach.vercel.app}.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/teaser_figure.pdf}\n \\caption{\n An example from \\system{}. Human coach provides gives guidance grounded in user's screen and with explanations while model coach gives instructions without explaining how or why. \n }\n \\label{fig:teaser}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\input{sections/1_introduction}\n\\input{sections/2_related-work}\n\\input{sections/3_dataset}\n\\input{sections/4_analysis}\n\\input{sections/5_coach-eval}\n\\input{sections/6_speak-eval}\n\\input{sections/7_interactive-eval}\n\\input{sections/8_discussion}\n\n\\section*{Acknowledgments}\n\\noindent This research was supported by an Amazon Research Award, a Google gift, a Google ML and Systems Junior Faculty Award, a Technical AI Safety Research award from Coefficient Giving, and an NVIDIA Academic Grant Program award. We also thank our study participants for their time and valuable contribution to this work.\n\n\\section*{Limitations}\n\\noindent Our dataset has several limitations. First, all sessions were collected on a Windows laptop to standardize the environment and reflect industry standards (\\emph{e.g.,} Blender is more commonly used on Windows). Future research could include multiple operating systems to capture diverse UI layouts and interaction behaviors. \nSecond, although \\system{} captures \\duration{} hours of coaching sessions across diverse software domains and participants, future work could expand the dataset with more sessions, more diverse software applications, and a broader range of novice and expert participants.\nThird, spoken dialogue often contains pauses, repairs, partial phrases, and overlaps. As a result, utterance segmentation and annotation can be ambiguous. We mitigate this by using explicit segmentation and annotation guidelines. Future work could explore alternative segmentation and annotation methods on our raw data.\nFinally, evaluating computer use coaching remains an open challenge. Task completion alone does not fully capture learning. While our pre/post tasks provide an effective measure of learning, they cannot fully capture skill retention over time. Future benchmarks can therefore evaluate coaching along multiple dimensions (\\emph{e.g.,} agency, task milestones, interaction traces, and pre/post tasks) and multiple domains (\\emph{e.g.,} open-ended creative tasks). \\system{} opens directions for building gym-style benchmarks for computer use coaching agents.\n\n\\section*{Ethical Considerations}\n\\label{sec:ethics}\n\\paragraph{Human Data Collection and Evaluation} Our human evaluation study was approved by our institution’s Institutional Review Board (IRB). In our study, we ensured that all participants were compensated fairly for their time and contributions. The payment was determined based on the average market rate for such studies, participant expertise, and the complexity and duration of the tasks (\\$20 / hour for learners and human evaluators; \\$20 -- 60 / hour for coaches, depending on their experiences).\n\n\\paragraph{Hallucinations in Language Models} Our work also uses LLMs to annotate dialogue acts and coaching methods. While we have shown that these approaches better align with humans, LLMs are not free from potential hallucinations and can lead to inaccurate results.\n\n\\paragraph{Automation vs. Augmentation.}\nWhile LLM agents are increasingly framed as replacements for human labor, our work points to a different role for agents: not automating tasks, but supporting humans in developing new skills. However, this framing also requires caution. For example, coaching agents could be deployed as substitutes for human experts and thus reduce access to human mentorship and weaken the social and emotional support from human coaches. We therefore view coaching agents as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, human expertise.\n\n\\paragraph{Trust in Coaching Agents.}\nLearners may place high trust in computer use coaching agents, especially when they lack the expertise to judge if its guidance is correct. Incorrect or overconfident instructions can mislead learners and reinforce misconceptions. We are aware that future design of computer use coaching agents should communicate uncertainty, support verification, and make it easy for learners to question or override their guidance.\n\n\n%\\bibliography{anthology,custom}\n\\bibliography{custom}\n\n\\input{sections/appendix}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/1_introduction.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Introduction}\n\n\\noindent Professional software tools for creativity (\\textit{e.g.}, Blender), engineering (\\textit{e.g.}, OnShape), and analysis (\\textit{e.g.}, Excel) are powerful but hard to learn. \nAgents now let novices use natural language instructions to easily execute creativity, engineering, and analysis tasks end-to-end without using the graphical user interfaces (GUIs) of the software~\\cite{wang_genartist_2024,yin_vision-as-inverse-graphics_2026, Gao2024EmpoweringBDA}.\nHowever, GUIs remain important to professionals as they afford expressivity, precision, and speed that cannot be achieved with natural language alone. \nFor example, skilled Blender users can use the hotkey ``G'' then drag an object to position it, rather than using natural language to describe what object to move and where to move it.\nFor novices who want to develop such software expertise, the automation afforded by agents bypasses learning. \nThus, we explore a new role for agents: teaching novices the skills they need to use these interfaces effectively.\n% supporting novices to learn how to use the full power of these interfaces. \n% reducing the initial learning curve for novices so that they can use the full power of these interfaces.\n\n% \\noindent Professional software for creativity (\\textit{e.g.}, Figma), engineering (\\textit{e.g.}, OnShape), and analysis (\\textit{e.g.}, Excel) is powerful but hard to learn.\n% Recently, multimodal agents have been designed for automating editing in image~\\cite{wang_genartist_2024}, video~\\cite{wang_videoagent_2024}, and 3D graphics~\\cite{yin_vision-as-inverse-graphics_2026} end to end by simply taking a natural language instruction.\n% However, graphical user interfaces (GUIs) remain important to professionals because they let skilled users perform spatial, visual, and granular operations more efficiently and precisely by hot keys and direct manipulation.\n% For example, in Blender, an expert would press \\texttt{G} then moving the mouse to position an object in space, while a novice might write a long prompt to instruct an agent.\n% Yet, for novices who want to develop expertise, automation bypasses the learning process. \n% Thus, we explore a different role for AI: helping novices reduce the initial learning curve so they can eventually use the full power of these interfaces themselves.\n\nNovices traditionally learn from expert demonstrations in webpage or video tutorials, but these materials are one-size-fits-all and require learners to manually align their own progress with the tutorial. To counter this, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research has prototyped systems~\\cite{gmeiner_prototyping_2025, huh_vid2coach_2025} that transform tutorials into task assistants. But can current models generate adaptive, grounded guidance that supports skill acquisition beyond task completion?\n\nWe introduce \\textbf{\\system{}}, a dataset for (1) characterizing multimodal language-based interactions during human expert--novice computer use coaching and (2) analyzing how well models emulate human expert coaching. \\system{} contains \\sessions{} computer use coaching sessions of 40 participants spanning creativity, engineering, and productivity domains. \\system{} has \\turns{} turns dialogues grounded in \\duration{} hours screen recordings, \\nevents{} input events, and \\nfiles{} file snapshots. To capture both the communicative and pedagogical functions of language use, we annotate utterances with dialogue acts and coaching methods.\n\nWe then evaluate 6 state-of-the-art models as computer use coaching agents using \\system{}. Results show that model utterances differ distributionally from human utterances and are less lexically and semantically diverse. Compared to human coaches, models predominantly use direct instruction ($>$45\\% of turns of all models vs. 30\\% for humans). They provide less feedback on the screen state and ask fewer questions.\nThe best model (Gemini-3.1-Pro) can\ngenerate plausible local guidance (CLAIR = 41.4) similar to human references when knowing the coaching method. Yet, current models all rely more on textual history than on the learner's screen state as models perform similarly without visual context, but their scores drop substantially without dialogue context. \n\nIn real-time interaction, learners coached by models completed fewer milestones and retained fewer skills. We show that models still struggle to provide guidance grounded in evolving screen states and rarely offer reusable knowledge that helps learners accomplish similar tasks independently in the future. \nThese findings suggest that effective computer use coaching agents require adaptive combinations of instruction and feedback based on the learner's evolving progress and opportunities for transferable skill development.\n\nIn summary, we contribute: \n\\begin{itemize}[itemsep=0em, topsep=0.2em, parsep=0em, partopsep=0em]\n \\item \\system{}, a \\duration{} hour human expert-novice GUI-grounded dialogue dataset with fine-grained annotations of dialogue acts and coaching methods. \n \\item Quantitative and qualitative characterizations distinguishing human and model coaching. \n \\item Expert rating and interactive human evaluations revealing communication and grounding gaps in real-time model coaching.\n\\end{itemize}\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/2_related-work.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Related Work}\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4.2pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.12}\n\\resizebox{\\linewidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{p{3cm}p{1.8cm}c c c c cccccc}\n\\toprule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Dataset}} \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Domain}} \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Source}} \n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{Setup}} \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Duration}} \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{\\# Turns}} \n& \\multicolumn{5}{c}{\\textbf{Data}} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){4-5} \\cmidrule(lr){8-12}\n& & \n& \\textbf{\\# Ppl.} & \\textbf{Relationship} \n& & \n& \\textbf{Text} & \\textbf{Audio} & \\textbf{Video} & \\textbf{Action} & \\textbf{File} \\\\\n\\midrule\nPortal Dialogue Corpus \n& Game \n& Real\n& 2 & Collaborator\n& 11.5h & 24.5k\n& \\cmark & \\cmark & \\cmark & \\xmark & \\cmark \\\\\n\nMathDial\n& Education \n& Semi-synthetic\n& 1 & Expert-Novice \n& -- & 28.3k\n& \\cmark & \\xmark & \\xmark & \\xmark & \\xmark \\\\\n\nVideoCAD \n& Professional \n& Synthetic\n& 0 & -- \n& 2.1kh & --\n& \\xmark & \\xmark & \\cmark & \\cmark & \\xmark \\\\\n\nAssistGUI \n& Professional \n& Real\n& 1 & -- \n& $<$8.3h & --\n& \\xmark & \\xmark & \\cmark & \\cmark & \\xmark \\\\\n\nRealWebAssist \n& Everyday \n& Real\n& 1 & -- \n& $<$6h & --\n& \\cmark & \\cmark & \\cmark & \\xmark & \\xmark \\\\\n\nGUIDE \n& Professional \n& Real\n& 1 & -- \n& 67.5h & --\n& \\cmark & \\cmark & \\cmark & \\xmark & \\xmark \\\\\n\nMixAssist \n& Professional \n& Real\n& 2 & Expert-Novice\n& 7h & 431\n& \\cmark & \\cmark & \\xmark & \\xmark & \\xmark \\\\\n\n\\midrule\n\\system{} \n& Professional \n& Real\n& 2 & Expert-Novice\n& \\duration{}h & 22.7k\n& \\cmark & \\cmark & \\cmark & \\cmark & \\cmark \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}%\n}\n\\caption{Compared to related datasets~\\cite{tomlin_characterizing_2025, macina_mathdial_2023, man_videocad_2025, gao_assistgui_2024, ye_realwebassist_2025, yang_guide_2026, clemens_mixassist_2025}, \\system{} captures real human--human computer use coaching with much richer multimodal data.}\n\\label{tab:comparison_digitalcoach}\n\\end{table*}\n\\paragraph{Language Use in Situated Collaboration.}\nPrior work has studied how agents ground and coordinate through language under partial observability and differing task knowledge~\\cite{allen_trains_1995, allen2002human, lin_decision-oriented_2024, shaikh2024grounding, suhr_executing_2019, bara_mindcraft_2021, udagawa_annotated_2020}. % in controlled synthetic environments designed for data collection and evaluation.\nMore recent work moves toward richer settings, such as video games, household tasks, and collaborative drawing~\\cite{zhang_proactive_2025, tomlin_characterizing_2025, padmakumar2022teach, howtodiv_2025, bhattacharyya2026can, kim2019codraw}.\nHowever, no existing collaborative dialogue dataset is grounded in GUI workflows where people seek and provide help via multimodal communication (\\emph{e.g.,} spatial referencing). Our dataset fills this gap by capturing expert-novice multimodal communication during GUI tasks.\n\n\\paragraph{Pedagogical and Instructional Dialogue.}\nUnlike transactional dialogue systems that focus on task completion and intent tracking, such as making reservations~\\cite{gasic_pomdp-based_2013} or tool use~\\cite{yao_tau-bench_2024}, pedagogical dialogue emphasizes on how systems support learning through feedback, questioning, and scaffolding~\\cite{sawyer_cognitive_2022}. \n% Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory frames learning as guided participation in practice, where experts instruct, scaffold, and gradually fade support as learners gain competence~\\cite{sawyer_cognitive_2022}. Thus, prior pedagogical dialogue corpora and benchmark aim to evaluate AI tutors not only by correctness but also by pedagogical effectiveness. \nPrior datasets such as MathDial~\\cite{macina_mathdial_2023}, MathTutorBench~\\cite{macina_mathtutorbench_2025}, and ConvoLearn~\\cite{sharma_convolearn_2026} evaluate tutoring quality in domains including mathematics and geography, while MixAssist captures expert--amateur collaboration in music production workflows~\\cite{clemens_mixassist_2025}. However, these datasets are either text-based or grounded in static content, and none capture instruction grounded in an evolving visual environment. \n\\system{} fills this gap with multimodal expert-novice interactions grounded in real-time GUI state and user actions.\n\n\n\n\n\\paragraph{Collaborative GUI Agents.}\nGUI agent research primarily studies whether agents can interpret interface state and execute actions to complete user goals. Benchmarks such as WebArena and OSWorld evaluate agents on web and desktop tasks using screenshots, natural language goals, and interface actions~\\cite{zhou_webarena_2023, xie_osworld_2024}. More recent work extends to screen recordings that capture software interactions over time~\\cite{man_videocad_2025, lin_videogui_nodate, jang_videowebarena_2025}.\nHowever, existing GUI agent benchmarks primarily focus on autonomous task completion rather than collaboration with users during analytic and creative workflows where user agency matters~\\cite{shen_completion_2025}. Recent work explores more proactive assistants that pause at decision points or reason about user intent~\\cite{peng_morae_2025, huq_cowpilot_2025, yang_guide_2026}, but the language and dynamics of collaborative interaction remain underexplored. \\system{} addresses this gap by characterizing human and model coaching.\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/3_dataset.tex\n================================================\n\\section{\\system{} Dataset}\n\n\\noindent\nWe study the collaborative task of computer use coaching, where an expert and learner collaborate to teach the learner key skills in complex software applications, so that the learner can leave the interaction with expanded creative agency in the software.\nIn designing our study, we follow two principal design considerations: we aim to capture and characterize (a) \\textit{multimodal dialogue}, with language use grounded in states (file snapshots), observation (screen recordings), and action (input events), and (b) \\textit{learning outcomes}, using pre/post tasks measuring if learners retain/transfer learned skills.\n\n% We capture two primary considerations for our dataset: \\textbf{(1) Multimodal Grounded Instructional Dialogue:} multi-turn coaching dialogue paired with screen recordings, interaction logs, and file snapshots; \\textbf{(2) Learning Outcome:} matched pre/post tasks for each tutorial to measure whether learners retain and transfer the skill beyond task completion.\n\n\n\n\\system{} contains \\turns{} utterances across 72 human expert-learner coaching sessions (Table~\\ref{tab:comparison_digitalcoach}). Beyond dialogue, \\system{} also captures rich multimodal activity traces including \\duration{} hours of screen recordings, \\nevents{} input events, and \\nfiles{} file snapshots to support research on language grounding in action and perception. Appendix~\\ref{sec:dataset-detail} contains additional details.\n\n\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/study_setup.pdf}\n \\caption{\n Collection setup, illustrated in the CAD software Onshape. A novice learner operates the software while an expert coach provides real-time verbal instructions and screen annotations.\n }\n \\label{fig:study_setup}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Data Collection and Construction}\n\n\\paragraph{Tasks.} We selected 5 software applications spanning 3 domains: productivity (Excel), creativity (FL Studio, Blender, Figma), and engineering (Onshape). We sourced 18 tasks (\\emph{e.g.,} Figure~\\ref{fig:study_setup} shows making a saddle bracket in OnShape) from official and popular online tutorials, covering a range of lengths, difficulties, and modalities (text, audio, image, and 3D model, see Appendix~\\ref{sec:tasks}).\n\n\\paragraph{Participants.}\nWe recruited a total of 20 English-speaking software-specific experts and 20 English-speaking novices through professional networks and Upwork,\\footnote{\\url{https://www.upwork.com/}} comprising 20 total pairs (4 pairs $\\times$ 5 applications). Novices had on average under one year ($\\mu$ = 0.25, $\\sigma$ = 0.44) of experience with and a strong interest in the target software; experts had at least 5 years of software experience ($\\mu=9.25$, $\\sigma=5.39$) and 6 months of coaching experience.\n\\footnote{Data collection and human evaluation studies in section~\\ref{sec:human-eval} and~\\ref{sec:interactive-eval} are approved by our institution’s IRB.}\n\n\\paragraph{Collection Setup.} Each session paired one expert with one novice for approximately 3 hours, covering 3-4 tasks in a single software application. Sessions were conducted over Zoom, with learners sharing their screens while experts coached via verbal instruction, screen annotation, or remote control (Figure~\\ref{fig:study_setup}). Before and after each tutorial task, learners also accomplished matched pre- and post-tasks targeting the same software skills as the tutorial but with variations (\\emph{e.g.,} making a donut in Blender in tutorial v.s. making a caramel apple in pre/post task). Learners completed these independently (up to 15 min per task, Appendix~\\ref{sec:protocol} describes the full study protocol).\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/4_analysis.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Dialogue Acts and Coaching Methods}\n\\paragraph{Dialogue Acts.}\nTo characterize communicative functions of language use in computer use coaching, we developed a dialogue act schema based on Dialog Act Markup in Several Layers~\\cite[DAMSL;][]{core_coding_1997, stolcke_dialogue_2000}. We adapted DAMSL by merging similar categories (\\emph{e.g.,} \\textit{Command} and \\textit{Suggestion}) and removing less relevant acts (\\emph{e.g.,} \\textit{Exclamation}). The final schema consists of information-seeking acts (\\textit{Info Request}), information-providing acts (\\textit{Answer, Inform, Opinion}), action-oriented acts (\\textit{Action Directive}), and grounding acts (\\textit{Backchannel}) that are common in a task-oriented multimodal coaching dialogue.\n\n\\paragraph{Coaching Methods.}\nWe further annotate each coach utterance to capture what types of guidance are delivered, based on prior work on cognitive apprenticeship theory~\\cite{sawyer_cognitive_2022, ahn_answer_2026}, and video tutorial instruction~\\cite{yang_beyond_2023}. Our schema separates procedural guidance (\\textit{Direct Instruction, Plan}), knowledge (\\textit{Explanation, Tip}), feedback (\\textit{Confirmation, Diagnosis}), and learner-centered elicitation (\\textit{Clarification, Reflection, Articulation, Exploration}). \n\n\\subsection{Annotation and Classification} \\noindent Three trained annotators independently labeled dialogue acts for a subset of utterances (200 total utterances; 40 randomly-sampled continuous turns per task), and coaching methods for 133 utterances from coach from the same sampled subset. The three annotators achieve substantial agreement \\cite[Fleiss $\\kappa$ = 0.79 for dialogue acts, $\\kappa$ = 0.76 for coaching methods; ][]{fleiss_equivalence_1973}. We use an LLM classifier (GPT-5.4) to annotate dialogue acts and coaching methods across the entire dataset~\\cite[mean Cohen's $\\kappa$ = 0.69 for dialogue acts and 0.66 for coaching methods;][]{cohen1960coefficient}. We evaluate classifier performance against human annotations, achieving an F1 of 0.85 for dialogue acts and 0.83 for coaching methods. See Appendix~\\ref{sec:annotation} for further details.\n\n\\subsection{Dataset Analysis}\n\\noindent computer use coaching dialogue acts are task-oriented and are asymmetrically distributed across participants (Coach: 65.8\\% vs. Learner: 34.2\\%). Coaches mostly give \\textit{Action Directives} (37\\%) and \\textit{Inform} (29\\%), while learners primarily provide \\textit{Backchannels} (50\\%) or ask \\textit{Info Requests} (13\\%). Human coaches rely heavily on \\textit{Direct Instruction} (31\\%), but also use confirmation (17\\%), explanation (20\\%), planning (7\\%), diagnosis (7\\%), and learner-centered elicitation (7\\%). \nCoaching method bigram sequences further show that \\textit{Direct Instruction} often appear after \\textit{Confirmation} ($N = 1026$, 5.71\\%), \\textit{Explanation} ($N = 1020$, 5.67\\%), \\textit{Plan} ($N = 537$, 2.99\\%), and \\textit{Diagnosis} ($N = 502$, 2.79\\%). Results highlight that experts often first orient the learner to a goal, concept, or problem before giving an actionable next step.\\footnote{See annotation result details in Appendix~\\ref{sec:additional-annotation}.}\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/5_coach-eval.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Do Models Coach Like Humans?}\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/human_model_mean_token.png}\n \\caption{ \n Mean token length across dialogue progress of sampled 18 sessions for human coaches and six models under Vanilla (V) and Coach (C) prompt conditions.\n }\n \\label{fig:human-model-mean-token}\n\\end{figure}\n\\noindent We first analyze the distinctions between coaching behaviors in model and human coaches.\n\n\\paragraph{Task Definition.} Formally, we cast the coach's task as given the preceding context $C_i$ consisting of the dialogue history and sampled screen frames within a time window $\\Delta$, and a task description $T$ specifying the learning objectives, intermediate goals, and expected outcome, the model must generate a coaching utterance $\\hat{y}_i$ for each human coach turn $y_i$ at time $t_i$. We hypothesize that an effective coaching agent should generate $\\hat{y}_i$ that closely matches the human reference $y_i$.\n\n% mapping from preceding context $C_i$, including the dialogue history (both utterances and observations of the learner's screen), to an utterance \n\n% given recent learner screen context and conversation history between a learner and a human expert, the model must generate a relevant, correct, and helpful coaching utterance. \n% Formally, for each human coach utterance \\(y_i\\) produced at time \\(t_i\\) in task \\(T\\), the model observes the preceding context \\(C_i\\) and generates a coach utterance $\\hat{y}_i$.\n% \\(T\\) includes the learning objectives, intermediate goals, and expected final outcome. \n% \\(C_i\\) includes the prior human coach-learner dialogue utterances and sampled screen frames within a time window of length \\(\\Delta\\).\n% We hypothesize an effective coaching agent should generate an utterance \\(\\hat{y}_i\\) similar to the human coach reference utterance \\(y_i\\).\n\n% \\begin{figure}[t]\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/dial-act-n-gram.png}\n% \\caption{\n% Jensen–Shannon Divergence (JSD) between model and human dialogue act sequences at the unigram, bigram, and trigram levels, under vanilla (blue) and coach (gold) prompting conditions. \\meng{potentially use a table rather than chart}\n% }\n% \\label{fig:dial-act-n-gram}\n% \\end{figure}\n\n% \\begin{figure}[t]\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/coaching-n-gram.png}\n% \\caption{\n% Jensen–Shannon Divergence (JSD) between model and human coaching method sequences at the unigram, bigram, and trigram levels, under vanilla (blue) and coach (gold) prompting conditions.\\meng{potentially use a table rather than chart}\n% }\n% \\label{fig:coaching-n-gram}\n% \\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Setup}\n\\paragraph{Models.}\nWe selected 4 closed and 2 open models with multimodal input: GPT-5.4~\\cite{openai_introducing_2026}, Gemini-3.1-Pro and Gemini-3-Flash~\\cite{noauthor_gemini_nodate}, Claude-Sonnet-4.6~\\cite{Claude4.6}, Qwen-3-VL-8B-Instruct~\\cite{bai_qwen3-vl_2025}, and Llama-4-Scout-17B~\\cite{noauthor_llama_nodate}. All models use default settings, generating one sentence per input given conversation and visual context at 1 fps (up to 30s).\n\n\\paragraph{Data.} We randomly sampled one complete expert--learner session per task (18 tasks $\\times$ 1 session) and run model generation over each full trajectory, yielding 18 sessions as our evaluation set.\n\n\\paragraph{Conditions.} We compare two prompting conditions: \\emph{(i)}~a \\textbf{vanilla prompt} containing the task description and dialogue history, and \\emph{(ii)}~a \\textbf{coach prompt} that additionally provides our coaching method taxonomy and asks it to choose the most appropriate ones (see Appendix~\\ref{sec:prompts}). \n\n\\subsection{Results}\n\\noindent Figure~\\ref{fig:human-model-mean-token} shows that models generate longer utterances and do not shorten over the course of the dialogue as human coaches do~\\cite{hua_talk_2024}. We therefore studied whether this added verbosity reflects diverse and richer coaching behavior or not.\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/human_model_dial_acts.pdf}\n \\caption{\nDialogue act distributions of sampled 18 sessions for human coaches and six models under Vanilla (V) and Coach (C) prompt conditions.}\n \\label{fig:human-model-dialogue-acts}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/human_model_coaching.pdf}\n \\caption{\nCoaching method distributions of sampled utterances for human coaches and six models under Vanilla (V) and Coach (C) prompt conditions.}\n \\label{fig:human-model-coaching}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\paragraph{Models predominantly give direct instruction.} Figure~\\ref{fig:human-model-dialogue-acts} shows that, compared to humans, all models predominately uses \\textit{Action Directives} (>53\\% vs. 26\\%) and rarely request information from learners except Gemini-3.1-Pro (Coach) (<6\\% vs. 8\\%). \nIn terms of coaching methods, model predominantly use direct instruction (>45\\% vs. 30\\%) but rarely provides conceptual guidance such as \\textit{Explanation}(<12\\% vs. 20\\%) and \\textit{Tip} (<1\\% vs. 6\\%) and learner-centered methods (Figure~\\ref{fig:pragmatic_diversity}). \nLlama-4-Scout and Qwen-3-VL-8b-Instruct are instruction-heavy, with over 80\\% of their dialogue acts as \\textit{Action Directives} and nearly all of their coaching methods as \\textit{Direct Instruction} and \\textit{Plan}. Gemini and Claude are more human, using relatively more \\textit{Inform} acts and more \\textit{Explanation} and \\textit{Confirmation} methods. \n% Claude-Sonnet-4.6 generates more \\textit{Diagnosis} compared to humans. \nGPT-5.4 is the least diverse model, using only \\textit{Direct Instruction}, \\textit{Confirmation}, and \\textit{Explanation} with no learner-centric elicitation.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/text-diversity.pdf}\n \\caption{ \n Lexical diversity (Self-BLEU, $\\downarrow$) and semantic diversity (Vendi Score, $\\uparrow$) of coaching utterances for human coaches and six models under vanilla (blue) and coach (gold) prompt conditions.\n }\n \\label{fig:pragmatic_diversity}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\paragraph{Model utterances are less diverse than human coaching.}\nTo measure whether models repeat the same responses or adapt across turns, we report lexical diversity ~\\cite[Self-BLEU, $\\downarrow$;][]{montahaei_jointly_2019} and semantic diversity~\\cite[Vendi Score, $\\uparrow$;][]{friedman_vendi_2023}. Figure~\\ref{fig:pragmatic_diversity} shows that human coaches produce the most lexically and semantically diverse outputs, while all models fall substantially short on both metrics. \n% Among models, GPT-5.4 (Vanilla) achieves the lowest Self-BLEU (0.396), while Qwen-3-VL-8B-Instruct (Vanilla) achieves the highest Self-BLEU (0.563), indicating the most repetitive outputs. Claude-Sonnet-4.6 has the most semantically narrow responses evident by the lowest Vendi score (4.324). \nThis gap is consistent with the more diverse dialogue acts of human coaches, whereas models tend to generate more scripted procedural guidance, a pattern consistent with prior findings that language models often underrepresent the diversity of human communication~\\cite{guo_benchmarking_2024,chan2022s}.\n\n\n\\paragraph{Prompting with coaching methods does not shift model behavior.} Model method distributions in coach prompt remain largely unchanged relative to the vanilla condition across both dialogue acts (Figure~\\ref{fig:human-model-dialogue-acts}) and coaching methods (Figure~\\ref{fig:human-model-coaching}). The gap between model and human coaching is not one of awareness but of capability: models default to instructional behavior even when explicitly guided otherwise. Closing this gap likely requires training interventions rather than prompting alone.\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.08}\n\\begin{tabularx}{\\linewidth}{Xcc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Model} & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{MAUVE} (95\\% CI)} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){2-3}\n& \\textbf{Vanilla} & \\textbf{Coach} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\textbf{GPT-5.4} & 0.017$_{\\pm \\text{0.008}}$ & 0.018$_{\\pm \\text{0.009}}$ \\\\\n\\textbf{Gemini-3-Flash} & 0.042$_{\\pm \\text{0.016}}$ & 0.039$_{\\pm \\text{0.019}}$ \\\\\n\\textbf{Gemini-3.1-Pro} & \\textbf{0.075$_{\\pm \\text{0.037}}$} & \\textbf{0.118$_{\\pm \\text{0.049}}$} \\\\\n\\textbf{Claude-Sonnet-4.6} & 0.034$_{\\pm \\text{0.018}}$ & 0.036$_{\\pm \\text{0.016}}$ \\\\\n\\textbf{Qwen-3-VL-Instruct} & 0.038$_{\\pm \\text{0.018}}$ & 0.031$_{\\pm \\text{0.018}}$ \\\\\n\\textbf{Llama-4-Scout} & \\underline{0.053$_{\\pm \\text{0.025}}$} & \\underline{0.045$_{\\pm \\text{0.027}}$} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabularx}\n\\caption{MAUVE scores ($[0,1]$, $\\uparrow$; mean $\\pm$ 95\\% CI) between model and human distributions.}\n% A score closer to $1$ indicates greater distributional similarity to human coach utterances.}\n\\label{tab:mauve}\n\\end{table}\n\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.08}\n\\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{lcccccccc}\n\\toprule\n& & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{Modality}} \n& \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\textbf{Context}} \n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{Prompt}} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){3-4}\\cmidrule(lr){5-7}\\cmidrule(lr){8-9}\n\\textbf{Model} \n& \\textbf{Default} \n& \\textbf{Text-Only} \n& \\textbf{Image-Only} \n& \\textbf{1s} \n& \\textbf{10s} \n& \\textbf{60s} \n& \\textbf{Vanilla} \n& \\textbf{Coach} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\textbf{GPT-5.4} \n& 32.4$_{\\pm \\text{1.3}}$ \n& 31.8$_{\\pm \\text{1.3}}$ \n& 25.3$_{\\pm \\text{1.2}}$ \n& 25.4$_{\\pm \\text{1.2}}$ \n& 31.2$_{\\pm \\text{1.3}}$ \n& 32.7$_{\\pm \\text{1.3}}$ \n& 24.0$_{\\pm \\text{1.2}}$ \n& 23.8$_{\\pm \\text{1.2}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Gemini-3-Flash} \n& \\underline{33.9$_{\\pm \\text{1.4}}$} \n& 32.7$_{\\pm \\text{1.4}}$ \n& \\underline{27.2$_{\\pm \\text{1.3}}$} \n& \\underline{28.4$_{\\pm \\text{1.3}}$} \n& \\underline{32.9$_{\\pm \\text{1.4}}$} \n& \\underline{34.6$_{\\pm \\text{1.4}}$} \n& \\underline{25.2$_{\\pm \\text{1.3}}$} \n& \\underline{25.0$_{\\pm \\text{1.3}}$} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Gemini-3.1-Pro} \n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 41.4$_{\\pm \\text{1.5}}$} \n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 41.9$_{\\pm \\text{1.5}}$} \n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 30.0$_{\\pm \\text{1.4}}$} \n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 33.7$_{\\pm \\text{1.4}}$} \n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 39.3$_{\\pm \\text{1.5}}$} \n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 41.6$_{\\pm \\text{1.5}}$} \n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 30.6$_{\\pm \\text{1.4}}$} \n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 31.0$_{\\pm \\text{1.4}}$} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Claude-Sonnet-4.6} \n& 32.3$_{\\pm \\text{1.3}}$ \n& \\underline{35.9$_{\\pm \\text{1.4}}$} \n& 23.7$_{\\pm \\text{1.2}}$ \n& 25.6$_{\\pm \\text{1.2}}$ \n& 31.4$_{\\pm \\text{1.3}}$ \n& 32.3$_{\\pm \\text{1.4}}$ \n& 22.4$_{\\pm \\text{1.2}}$ \n& 24.1$_{\\pm \\text{1.2}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Qwen-3-VL-Instruct} \n& 27.0$_{\\pm \\text{1.2}}$ \n& 28.3$_{\\pm \\text{1.2}}$ \n& 20.2$_{\\pm \\text{1.0}}$ \n& 23.0$_{\\pm \\text{1.1}}$ \n& 27.0$_{\\pm \\text{1.2}}$ \n& 26.7$_{\\pm \\text{1.2}}$ \n& 18.8$_{\\pm \\text{1.1}}$ \n& 19.5$_{\\pm \\text{1.1}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Llama-4-Scout} \n& 19.5$_{\\pm \\text{1.0}}$ \n& 24.4$_{\\pm \\text{1.2}}$ \n& 16.3$_{\\pm \\text{0.8}}$ \n& 18.6$_{\\pm \\text{1.0}}$ \n& 20.2$_{\\pm \\text{1.0}}$ \n& 19.7$_{\\pm \\text{1.0}}$ \n& 14.8$_{\\pm \\text{0.8}}$ \n& 14.2$_{\\pm \\text{0.9}}$ \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}%\n}\n\\caption{CLAIR scores ($[1,100]$, $\\uparrow$; mean $\\pm$ 95\\% CI) for next coach utterance generation. The default setting uses text-visual input, 30s context, and oracle prompt. Other columns report ablations over input modality, context window, and prompt condition. CLAIR scores are judged by GPT-4.1 over 1,427 sampled pairs per run.}\n\\label{tab:clair_ablation}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/6_speak-eval.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Do Models Speak Like Humans?}\n\\label{sec:response-qual}\n\n\\noindent At the corpus level, model coaches do not speak like human coaches. Table~\\ref{tab:mauve} compares each model's utterance distribution with the human coach distribution using MAUVE~\\cite{pillutla_mauve_2021}. All model scores are low, even the best Gemini-3.1-Pro with the coach prompt (0.118 $_{\\pm\\text{0.049}}$). We further evaluate whether individual model utterances match the content and quality of human coach responses given the same context.\n% MAUVE ranges from 0 to 1, where higher scores mean closer distributional similarity. \n\n\\subsection{Automatic Evaluation}\n\\label{sec:auto-eval}\n\n\\paragraph{Data.} We randomly sampled 1{,}427 coach utterances across 5 software domains (300 per domain), balancing across coaching methods within each domain (targeting 30 per method). When a method had fewer than 30 utterances, all available examples were included. We excluded utterances tagged as \\textit{Not Enough Information} or \\textit{Non-Instructive}.\n\n\n\\paragraph{Conditions.}\nBy default, models receive both dialogue history and visual context sampled at 1 fps from the previous 30 seconds, and use an \\textbf{oracle prompt} that reveals the coaching method used in the reference human coach utterance (see Appendix~\\ref{sec:prompts}). We ablate three factors to compare model performance: \\textbf{(1) Input modality}: We compare text-only context, visual-only context, and combined text-visual context, \\textbf{(2) Context length}: We vary the context window across 1s, 10s, 30s, and 60s and \\textbf{(3) Prompt}: We compare a vanilla prompt, a coach prompt, and the oracle prompt.\n\n\n\\paragraph{Metrics.} \nWe compute content similarity between model utterances and human reference ones using CLAIR~\\cite{chan_clair_2023}. We also report standard reference-based generation metrics, including BLEU, METEOR, ROUGE-L, and BERTScore, as well as CLAIR scores split by software application and coaching method in Appendix~\\ref{sec:additional-eval}.\n\n\\paragraph{Results.}\nTable~\\ref{tab:clair_ablation} reports CLAIR scores of all models and conditions.\nGemini-3.1-Pro achieves the highest overall scores, while Llama-4-Scout lags considerably behind across all conditions.\n\n\\paragraph{Visual context is underutilized.}\nDropping visual input and using text alone causes only a modest score change for most models (e.g., Gemini-3.1-Pro: 41.4$_{\\pm\\text{1.5}}$ $\\to$ 41.9$_{\\pm\\text{1.5}}$), yet providing visual input only causes a sharp drop across all models (e.g., Gemini-3.1-Pro: 41.4$_{\\pm\\text{1.5}}$ $\\to$ 30.0$_{\\pm\\text{1.4}}$), suggesting models rely primarily on text.\n% (\\emph{i.e.}, task description and dialogue history) and fail to fully exploit screen state when it is the only available modality.\n\n\\paragraph{More context improves utterance quality.}\nShortening the context window to 1s substantially degrades performance\nacross all models (\\emph{e.g.}, Gemini-3.1-Pro: 41.4$_{\\pm\\text{1.5}}$ $\\to$ 33.7$_{\\pm\\text{1.4}}$; Qwen-3-VL-Instruct: 27.0$_{\\pm\\text{1.2}}$ $\\to$ 23.0$_{\\pm\\text{1.1}}$), while extending to 60s yields marginal further gains.\nModels benefit from observing a recent screen and conversations between learner and coach, but returns diminish beyond 10 seconds.\n\n% \\paragraph{Oracle prompt narrows but does not close the gap.}\n% Switching oracle prompt to a vanilla prompt causes a drop for all models.\n% (\\emph{e.g.}, Gemini-3.1-Pro: 41.4$_{\\pm\\text{1.5}}$ $\\to$ 30.6$_{\\pm\\text{1.4}}$; GPT-5.4: 32.4$_{\\pm\\text{1.3}}$ $\\to$ 24.0$_{\\pm\\text{1.2}}$), while coach prompt does not provide additional benefit over vanilla. \n% This confirms that knowing the target methods at inference time helps, but models still cannot fully translate pedagogical intent into human-like utterances.\n\n\\subsection{Human Expert Evaluation}\n\\label{sec:human-eval}\n\\noindent Model-generated utterances may differ from the reference and still be valid and relevant. We therefore conduct a human expert evaluation to assess the quality of model-generated utterances.\n\n\\paragraph{Method.}\nWe randomly sampled a subset (N=100, 20 utterances per software tool) from the dataset in Section~\\ref{sec:auto-eval} and recruited 15 expert evaluators (3 per software tool). Each evaluator judges 20 instances (2 per coaching method), and each instance was independently annotated by all 3 evaluators assigned to that software. For each instance, evaluators saw the task description, prior dialogue, and screen context. They ranked 3 candidate coaching utterances (human coach, Gemini-3.1-Pro Vanilla, and Gemini-3.1-Pro Oracle) and then rated each utterance along 3 dimensions using a three-point scale (1 = not, 2 = partially, 3 = very), drawn from prior VQA and proactive assistant work~\\cite{zhang_proactive_2025, levinboim_quality_2021}: (1) \\textbf{Relevance:} whether the utterance was grounded in visual and conversational content, (2) \\textbf{Correctness:} how correct the utterance was and (3) \\textbf{Naturalness:} whether the utterance sounded natural.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/expert_eval.png}\n \\caption{ \n Mean normalized ranking ($\\uparrow$) and ratings ($\\uparrow$) for human (H), Gemini-3.1-Pro Vanilla prompt (G(V)), and Oracle prompt (G(O)) coaching utterances (* = $p < 0.05$, ** = $p < 0.01$, Friedman test followed by pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Bonferroni correction).}\n \\label{fig:expert-eval}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\paragraph{Results.} Figure~\\ref{fig:expert-eval} shows human evaluators ranked human and Oracle conditions significantly higher than Vanilla ($p<.01$ and $p<.05$ respectively), suggesting that knowing the target coaching methods improves preference. Models scored comparably to humans on Relevance and Correctness, while human utterances were rated significantly more natural than Vanilla ($p<.05$), implying models generate locally plausible but unnatural utterances. Expert evaluators noted that effective coaching should be concise, accurate, and grounded in the learner's current screen state. Coaches should give direct instruction when learners are stuck, while encouraging independent thinking/using prior knowledge when possible.\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/7_interactive-eval.tex\n================================================\n\\section{How Do Models Interact with Humans? }\n\\label{sec:interactive-eval}\n\\noindent We have shown that models speak and coach differently from human coaches. \\textit{But what are interaction dynamics and effectiveness when models coach novices to use software in real time?}\n\n\n\\paragraph{Method.} We conducted an interactive evaluation with 10 participants from professional networks (P1--P10, 2 per software application) with the same setup as our data collection, yielding 36 model--human coaching sessions. To balance inference time and quality, learners completed tasks with guidance from Gemini-3-Flash with the Vanilla prompt and a 10s context window at 1 fps. Learners can interact with models via asking questions or receiving the model's proactive instructions every 20 seconds (See Appendix~\\ref{sec:ix-eval-setup} for system setup).\n% Since this evaluation contains fewer sessions than the human coaching dataset, we treat the comparison as descriptive rather than statistical.\n\n\\subsection{Learning Outcome}\n\\noindent Both human ($N=72$) and model ($N=36$) coaching produced significant improvement in matched pre/post tasks ($p<.001$, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), but human coaching was substantially more effective (Table~\\ref{tab:learning-progress-human-model}). Human coaching yielded a mean gain of 54.75\\% (33.49\\%~$\\to$~88.24\\%), with 81.9\\% of sessions improving and none declining. Model coaching produced a smaller mean gain of 31.67\\% (13.33\\%~$\\to$~45.00\\%), with only 58.3\\% of sessions improving, 25\\% showing no progress, and one declining.\nModels were far less effective than humans in teaching learners to use software independently.\nAppendix~\\ref{sec:add-learn-outcome-results} reports subjective ratings, pre/post task outcomes, and qualitative feedback.\n\n% All 72 human coaching sessions in \\system{} successfully completed the tutorial (Table~\\ref{tab:learning-progress-human-model}). We noticed that success does not mean retaining the skill. but i wonder how we can say it in a way that does not harm too much. }learners made substantially more progress on matched post-tasks than pre-tasks (\\(p<.001\\), Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Task completion increased from \\(\\mu_{\\mathrm{pre}}\\)= 33.49\\%, \\(\\sigma_{\\mathrm{pre}}\\) = 40.24 to \\(\\mu_{\\mathrm{post}}=88.24\\%, \\sigma_{\\mathrm{post}}=21.96\\), with an average gain of \\(\\mu_{\\mathrm{diff}}=54.75\\%, \\sigma_{\\mathrm{diff}}=39.15\\). Overall, 59 of 72 sessions improved (81.9\\%), 13 stayed the same, and none decreased. All participants made progress after coaching.\n% Across 36 model coaching sessions, learners also performed better on matched post-tasks than pre-tasks (\\(p<.001\\), Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Overall, 21 of 36 sessions improved (58.3\\%), 14 stayed the same, and 1 decreased. Task completion increased from \\(\\mu_{\\mathrm{pre}}=13.33\\%, \\sigma_{\\mathrm{pre}}=26.08\\) to \\(\\mu_{\\mathrm{post}}=45.00\\%, \\sigma_{\\mathrm{post}}=39.96\\), with an average gain of \\(\\mu_{\\mathrm{diff}}=31.67\\%, \\sigma_{\\mathrm{diff}}=40.81\\). However, post-task performance remained much less reliable than in human coaching sessions: 9 of 36 sessions still made no progress, and 12 of 36 reached only 0--50\\% completion. \n% Model coaching can support some learning transfer, but remains substantially less reliable than human coaching, especially for helping learners recover from mistakes and complete tasks independently. \n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.08}\n\\begin{tabularx}{\\linewidth}{Xcrrr}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Progress} \n& \\textbf{Setup} \n& \\textbf{Tutorial} \n& \\textbf{Pre-Task} \n& \\textbf{Post-Task} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{100\\%}}\n& H & 72 (100.0\\%) & 13 (18.1\\%) & 49 (68.1\\%) \\\\\n& M & 9 (25.0\\%) & 2 (5.6\\%) & 9 (25.0\\%) \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{50--100\\%}}\n& H & 0 (0.0\\%) & 7 (9.7\\%) & 15 (20.8\\%) \\\\\n& M & 7 (19.4\\%) & 2 (5.6\\%) & 6 (16.7\\%) \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{0--50\\%}}\n& H & 0 (0.0\\%) & 22 (30.6\\%) & 8 (11.1\\%) \\\\\n& M & 15 (41.7\\%) & 8 (22.2\\%) & 12 (33.3\\%) \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{0\\%}}\n& H & 0 (0.0\\%) & 30 (41.7\\%) & 0 (0.0\\%) \\\\\n& M & 5 (13.9\\%) & 24 (66.7\\%) & 9 (25.0\\%) \\\\\n\\toprule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Total}}\n& H & 72 (100.0\\%) & 72 (100.0\\%) & 72 (100.0\\%) \\\\\n& M & 36 (100.0\\%) & 36 (100.0\\%) & 36 (100.0\\%) \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabularx}\n\\caption{Progress outcomes in human (H; $N=72$) and model (M; $N=36$) coaching sessions.}\n\\label{tab:learning-progress-human-model}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\subsection{Language Use}\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/interactive_info.png}\n \\caption{ \n (A) Token length per utterance and (B) distribution of dialogue acts of coaches (C) and learners (L) in human (H; $N=72$) and model (M; $N=36$) coaching sessions.\n }\n \\label{fig:interactive-info}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\noindent The 36 model-human coaching sessions comprise 3,241 turns. Compared to human coaching sessions, models use more tokens per utterance, extensively use \\textit{Action Directives} (63\\% vs. 37\\%), and rarely use \\textit{Inform} (14\\% vs. 29\\%) that build learner understanding and \\textit{Info Request} (2\\% vs. 7\\%) to check-in learning state. Human learners, in turn, ask more questions (29\\% vs. 13\\%) and provide more information (20\\% vs. 9\\%), primarily due to the lack of proactivity of models (Figure~\\ref{fig:interactive-info}).\n\n\\subsection{Failure Case Analysis}\n\\noindent Figure~\\ref{fig:model-outcome} shows representative failure cases in model coaching sessions. \n% Participants reflected that model coach did not sufficiently adapt guidance to learners' confusion and mistakes and to the evolving screen state.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/model_outcome.pdf}\n \\caption{ \n Representative (A) communication and (B) grounding failures in interactive evaluation.\n }\n \\label{fig:model-outcome}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\paragraph{Communication Gap.}\nModels by default generated step-by-step instructions. While learners could replicate operations, they did not understand how or why (P4, P7, P9). Learners were still confused about the high-level plan and how to think about completing the task even after successful tutorials, leading to worse outcomes. \n% Without this, learning became hardcoded memorization of steps and only produced low-quality outcome \nSix participants found models too verbose and terminology-heavy, and novices found it hard to follow multiple steps and locate the relevant tools hidden in layers of menus (Figure~\\ref{fig:model-outcome} A). P3 observed that they can follow simple steps at the beginning, but guidance became increasingly confusing as the task state became more complex. Thus, they wanted slower and more concise guidance on where and how to find the target tool. P8 also suggested that, like a human coach, models could point or describe nearby icons to help learners find the right tool.\n\n\\paragraph{Grounding Gap.}\nModels fell short in tracking learners' current screen state, which required learners to explicitly describe progress (P1, P2, P5, P6) or ask what to do next (P3, P9, P10). P1 reported that they have to say \\textit{``I'm done''} to make the model move on to the next step. This limitation of real-time multimodal understanding prevented the model from detecting and recovering when learners were stuck or had gone off track. For example, P2 was told to click a button that did not exist, yet the model kept repeating the same instruction.\nSimilarly, P5 could not find where to create a pivot sheet, but the model repeated the same long instruction rather than trying a different approach.\nModels also did not point out mistakes unless explicitly asked. Even when they did respond, models sometimes hallucinated guidance based on misleading utterances rather than the screen state (Figure~\\ref{fig:model-outcome} B).\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/8_discussion.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Discussion and Conclusion}\n\n\\noindent We introduce \\system{}, the first multimodal dataset of human expert-novice computer use coaching sessions. Our analysis reveals that current state-of-the-art multimodal models exhibit significant communication and grounding gaps compared to human coaches: they more frequently use direct instruction, and fail to adapt to the learner's evolving screen state. In an interactive evaluation, these gaps directly result in worse learning outcomes, with model-coached learners completing fewer milestones and retaining fewer skills.\n\n\\paragraph{Agency-Preserving Language Technology.}\nEffective coaching balances direct instruction with learner agency. Human experts combine procedural guidance with explanation to build independence rather than replacing learner agency. For surface-level friction such as locating a menu item, direct instruction reduces unnecessary cognitive load, while for conceptual tasks such as design, agents should instead encourage reflection.\n% Coaching agents should balance how much to reveal based on what the learner most needs to learn.\n\n\\paragraph{Proactive and Grounded Multimodal Agents.}\nOur findings suggest that effective coaching agents must go beyond reactive question answering. Agents should proactively monitor learner progress and select pedagogical interventions accordingly. This requires tighter multimodal grounding, including real-time screen understanding and spatially situated feedback such as screen annotations to support the coaching that humans provide naturally.\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/appendix.tex\n================================================\n\\appendix\n\\clearpage\n\n\\section*{Appendix}\n\\label{sec:appendix}\n\n\\renewcommand{\\theequation}{\\thesection.\\arabic{equation}}\n\\renewcommand{\\thefigure}{\\thesection.\\arabic{figure}}\n\\renewcommand{\\thetable}{\\thesection.\\arabic{table}}\n\n% Reset counters at the start of each appendix section\n\\makeatletter\n\\@addtoreset{equation}{section}\n\\@addtoreset{figure}{section}\n\\@addtoreset{table}{section}\n\\makeatother\n\nOur appendix is organized as follows: \n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item \\autoref{sec:dataset-detail} provides detailed statistics and linguistic examples of the dataset.\n \\item \\autoref{sec:protocol} outlines the experimental platform setup and facilitation scripts.\n \\item \\autoref{sec:tasks} catalogs the specific software tasks across the five tested domains.\n \\item \\autoref{sec:transcription} details the human-in-the-loop transcript processing workflow.\n \\item \\autoref{sec:annotation} defines the dialogue act and coaching methods codebooks.\n \\item \\autoref{sec:additional-eval} details model evaluation baselines and metrics.\n \\item \\autoref{sec:prompts} provides the full text prompts utilized for LLM pipelines.\n \\item \\autoref{sec:add-learn-outcome-results} provides quantitative and qualitative human learning outcomes.\n \\item \\autoref{app:artifact-license-use} discusses the license of produced artifacts.\n \\item \\autoref{app:package-settings} provides information on settings for used code packages.\n % \\item \\autoref{app:consent} provides further details on the human subjects, consent, and data protection protocols.\n \\item \\autoref{app:ai} states our AI Use Disclosure.\n \n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\section{Dataset Details}\n\\label{sec:dataset-detail}\n\\noindent To support further research, the \\system{} dataset, including the screen recording, audio transcripts, mouse and keyboard events, and the file snapshots, will be made publicly available upon publication. The \\system{} dataset will be accessible on Hugging Face and the evaluation code on GitHub.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/appendix/turn_count_per_session.pdf}\n \\caption{\n Distribution of number of utterances across \\sessions{} sessions. Each bar shows the number of recorded coaching sessions within a duration range.\n }\n \\label{fig:turn_count}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/appendix/video_length_distribution.pdf}\n \\caption{\n Distribution of video durations across \\sessions{} sessions. Each bar shows the number of recorded coaching sessions within a duration range.\n }\n \\label{fig:video_length}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\begin{tabularx}{\\linewidth}{Xr}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Statistic} & \\textbf{Value} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\# Software Applications & 5 \\\\\n\\# Participants & 40 \\\\\n\\# Sessions & 72 \\\\\n\\midrule\nVideo Duration & \\duration{}h \\\\\nAvg. Duration & \\avgduration{} \\\\\nMin Duration & \\minduration{} \\\\\nMax Duration & \\maxduration{} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\# Total Turns & \\turns{} \\\\\n\\% Coach Turns & 65.81\\% \\\\\n\\% Learner Turns & 34.19\\% \\\\\nAvg. Turns per Session & 303.36 \\\\\nAvg. Turn Tokens & 9.69 \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\# Input Events & \\nevents{} \\\\\n\\# File Snapshots & \\nfiles{} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabularx}\n\\caption{Summary statistics of \\system{}.}\n\\label{tab:dataset_overview}\n\\end{table}\n\n\n\nIn this section, we provide detailed information about \\system{} and several examples of linguistic phenomena.\nTable~\\ref{tab:dataset_overview} shows detailed statistics of \\system{}.\nFigure~\\ref{fig:turn_count} shows the distribution of number of utterances across all sessions.\nFigure~\\ref{fig:video_length} shows the distribution of duration across all sessions.\nFigure~\\ref{fig:coaching_method} shows the distribution of coaching methods across the conversation progress of all 72 sessions.\n\n\\subsection{Additional Language Statistics}\n\\noindent We observed linguistic phenomena in \\system{}. \nToken frequency (Figure~\\ref{fig:token_freq}) follows a Zipfian distribution. Token length (Figure~\\ref{fig:token_len}) and gap length((Figure~\\ref{fig:gap_len}) follow exponential distributions, with fewer tokens and smaller gaps being most common.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/appendix/rank_frequency_zipf.pdf}\n \\caption{ \n Token frequencies in \\system{} follow a Zipfian distribution.\n }\n \\label{fig:token_freq}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/appendix/utterance_length_count.pdf}\n \\caption{\n Token length (number of words per utterance) follows an exponential distribution.\n }\n \\label{fig:token_len}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/appendix/inter_turn_gap_count.pdf}\n \\caption{\n Distribution of gap length follows an exponential distribution. We define the gap as the duration of silence between the end of one speaker and the beginning of the next speaker~\\cite{heldner_pauses_2010}.\n }\n \\label{fig:gap_len}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\subsection{Example Linguistic Phenomena}\n\\noindent In this section we provide examples of the linguistic phenomena observed in our coaching sessions.\n\n\\paragraph{Convention Formation.}\n0104/C2L2:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item Turn 386 (Coach): ``Alright, now we want to rename this to\\ldots \\emph{Card}.''\n \\item Turn 387 (Learner): ``\\emph{Card}.''\n \\item Turn 388 (Coach): ``Mhm. And let's make \\emph{card} have a corner radius of 8.''\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\paragraph{Spatial Referencing.}\n0104/C2L2:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item Turn 60 (Coach): ``Yep, and then just rotate it, um, by dragging on \\emph{this corner right here}\\ldots''\n \\item Turn 62 (Coach): ``Just hover over \\emph{this part}.''\n \\item Turn 63 (Learner): ``Hover \\emph{in}?''\n \\item Turn 64 (Coach): ``Hover over, like, \\emph{slightly outside of it}, like, \\emph{where my pink is}.''\n \\item Turn 65 (Learner): ``Ah, slightly--- okay.''\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\paragraph{Repair.}\n0104/C2L2:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item Turn 84 (Coach): ``Yep, now we have a, um, like, \\emph{component} for this play button.''\n \\item Turn 85 (Coach): ``Alright, so now we want to create, like, our album art frame, so\\ldots''\n \\item Turn 86 (Learner): ``\\emph{Wait}, well, component means\\ldots uh, \\emph{what again, exactly}? It's interactable with\\ldots''\n \\item Turns 87--90 (Coach): ``So, components are, like, the parent, um, designs\\ldots\\ [extended explanation] \\ldots That's a variant of this parent component.''\n \\item Turn 91 (Learner): ``\\emph{Okay, okay, got it, got it}.''\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\n\\section{Study Protocol}\n\\label{sec:protocol}\n\\noindent Each study session involved one expert coach, one novice learner, and one researcher facilitator. Sessions lasted approximately 3 hours and consisted of consent and setup, followed by 3--4 task blocks. Each task block included a pre-task, a tutorial task, and a post-task.\n\n\\subsection{Device Setup}\n\\noindent The coach and learner communicated remotely via Zoom throughout the session. Learners conducted all software activities on a study laptop (i.e., Lenovo E14 Gen 6) and use research accounts rather than their personal account to ensure privacy.\n\nWe used Zoom as the communication platform and the source of synchronized audio and screen recordings of the session. We recorded at 25 frames per second with 1920×1128 resolution. The audio was recorded from the study laptop microphone in mono channel with a 48K sampling rate.\n\nWe used Workflow Induction Toolkit~\\cite{wang_how_2025} to log mouse and keyboard actions on the study laptop. In addition, we implemented software-specific file loggers to save file snapshots periodically (i.e., every 10s), allowing us to reconstruct intermediate work states over time.\n\n\\subsection{Study Script}\n\\noindent One facilitator was present at each session. They were provided with the following script to facilitate the session.\n\n\\subsubsection{Before Study}\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item \\action{Set up the Zoom meeting}\n \\item \\action{Rename the participants as Coach, Learner, and Facilitator}\n \\item \\action{Share the study laptop screen with only the software window visible}\n \\item \\action{Hide the Zoom video pane and toolbar (Ctrl + Shift + Alt + H)}\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\subsubsection{Introduction and Consent}\nThank you both for joining today. I am \\placeholder{facilitator name}, and I will be the session facilitator.\n\nIn this study, you will work together to complete a set of activities using \\placeholder{software name}. Today, \\placeholder{coach name} will act as the coach, and \\placeholder{learner name} will act as the learner. The goal of the study is to understand how experts provide novices with instructions to learn \\placeholder{software name}. \n\nDuring the session, we will record the learner's screen, both participants' audio, and interaction logs from the learner's computer. I am now sending you the consent form and media release form. By signing these forms, you confirm that you understand the study procedures, that your questions have been answered, and that you agree to participate. \\action{Send consent forms.}\n\nWe also have this survey we would like you to fill out that asks about your experiences with \\placeholder{software name}. Please fill it out and let us\nknow when you’ve completed it. Let us know if you have any questions about it. \\action{Send pre-study survey.}\n\n\\placeholder{coach name}, can you see the green pencil icon at the bottom left of your screen? That is the Zoom annotation tool. Set the annotation color to \\textbf{pink} and the line thickness to \\textbf{thick}. Please use it to briefly draw on the learner's screen. \n\nNext, \\placeholder{learner name}, please grant remote control access to the coach. \\placeholder{coach name} may request remote control if needed during the coaching activity. \\action{Ask the coach to test remote control by moving the mouse and typing briefly.}\n\nIf any technical issues arise during the study, please let me know through Zoom chat. Otherwise, I will remain silent during the task activities and will only intervene if necessary.\n\n\\subsubsection{Task Block}\nEach task block lasted approximately 50 minutes and consisted of three phases:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item Pre-task (up to 15 minutes)\n \\item Tutorial task (10--60 minutes)\n \\item Post-task (up to 15 minutes)\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\paragraph{Pre-Task} We will now begin the pre-task. In this task, \\placeholder{learner name} will work on the task independently based on the task description. \\placeholder{coach name} should remain silent. \\placeholder{learner name}, you are encouraged to think aloud while working. You have up to 15 minutes to finish the task but you can stop at any time you want. \\action{Share pre-task document and starter file.} \\action{Start a 15-minute timer.}\n\n\\paragraph{Tutorial Task} We will now begin the tutorial task. There are no restrictions on how the coach and the learner should communicate. \\action{Share tutorial task document and starter file.}\n\n\\paragraph{Post-Task} We will now begin the post-task. This task is the same as the pre-task. The learner will have 15 minutes to work on the task independently based on the task description. The coach should not provide instruction unless the learner appears to be stuck for 3 minutes, in which case the coach may provide at most one hint. \\action{Share post-task document and starter file.} \\action{Start a 15-minute timer.}\n\n\\paragraph{Actions Before Each Task}\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item \\action{Start file logger.}\n \\item \\action{Start Workflow Induction Toolkit recorder.}\n % \\item \\action{Start OBS recording.}\n \\item \\action{Start Zoom recording.}\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\paragraph{Actions After Each Task}\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item \\action{Stop Zoom recording.}\n % \\item \\action{Stop OBS recording.}\n \\item \\action{Stop Workflow Induction Toolkit recorder.}\n \\item \\action{Stop file logger.}\n \\item \\action{Check that data have been saved correctly.}\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\section{Tasks}\n\\label{sec:tasks}\n\\noindent Table~\\ref{tab:software_learning_tasks} lists all tasks used in \\system{}.\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.15}\n\\begin{tabularx}{\\textwidth}{\n >{\\RaggedRight\\arraybackslash}p{0.13\\textwidth}\n >{\\RaggedRight\\arraybackslash}p{0.17\\textwidth}\n >{\\RaggedRight\\arraybackslash}X\n >{\\RaggedRight\\arraybackslash}p{0.17\\textwidth}\n}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Software} & \\textbf{Task} & \\textbf{Description} & \\textbf{Source} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{4}{=}{01 \\textbf{Figma}} \n& 01 Potion Bottle\n& Combine basic geometric shapes and manipulate vector paths to build a magic potion bottle organized in frames.\n& \\href{https://help.figma.com/hc/en-us/articles/13543867954711-Create-an-illustration-in-Figma-Design}{Official Tutorial} \\\\\n& 02 Loading Animation \n& Create a looping loading animation using frames, ellipses, Smart Animate, and component variants for use in a mobile app.\n& \\href{https://help.figma.com/hc/en-us/articles/18892560291351-Create-a-loading-animation-in-Figma}{Official Tutorial} \\\\\n& 03 Responsive Card \n& Build a responsive podcast episode card using Auto Layout, constraints, image fills, and components that adapt to different sizes.\n& \\href{https://help.figma.com/hc/en-us/articles/18894664907287-Create-a-responsive-card-with-auto-layout-and-constraints}{Official Tutorial} \\\\\n& 04 Flower Vase \n& Illustrate a transparent glass vase with flowers by designing repeated petal shapes and placing curved stems inside the vase.\n& \\href{https://help.figma.com/hc/en-us/articles/38456797147415-Illustrate-a-flower-vase-using-shapes-transforms-and-the-glass-effect}{Official Tutorial} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{4}{=}{02 \\textbf{Blender}} \n& 01 Donut Modeling \n& Create a donut mesh with icing using viewport navigation, Edit Mode, modifiers, and Sculpt Mode.\n& \\href{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBpnKTAc5Eo}{Online Tutorial} \\\\\n& 02 Shading \n& Assign and preview separate materials for a donut and icing using Blender's Shading view.\n& \\href{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsLO1F5x7yM}{Online Tutorial} \\\\\n& 03 Dropping Animation \n& Animate an existing donut model to fall downward along the Z axis using keyframes.\n& \\href{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o19U-yPGdyY}{Online Tutorial} \\\\\n& 04 Sprinkles \n& Add procedurally generated sprinkles to an existing donut's icing in Blender.\n& \\href{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWTOy5-e4Ns}{Online Tutorial} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{3}{=}{03 \\textbf{OnShape}} \n& 01 Saddle Bracket\n& Model a saddle bracket using sketching, extrusion, and semicircular cuts to match provided engineering dimensions.\n& \\href{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bkvw6dNT-T4}{Online Tutorial} \\\\\n& 02 Geneva Cam\n& Model a Geneva cam using sketch geometry, circular repetition, extrusion, and feature patterning from an engineering drawing.\n& \\href{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c50bmEeOIbI}{Online Tutorial} \\\\\n& 03 Hub \n& Build a hub by revolving a base profile and adding repeated curved slots to match specified diameters and angular spacing.\n& \\href{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UK1mblfM-94}{Online Tutorial} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{4}{=}{04 \\textbf{FL Studio}} \n& 01 Beat \n& Build a drum pattern with bass line using the Channel Rack and arrange patterns in the Playlist.\n& \\href{https://www.image-line.com/learn/lesson/making-a-beat-in-channel-rack}{Official Tutorial} \\\\\n& 02 Melody \n& Create and edit a melody in the Piano Roll, shaping note timing and dynamics before placing it in the Playlist.\n& \\href{https://www.image-line.com/learn/lesson/creating-melodies-in-piano-roll}{Official Tutorial} \\\\\n& 03 Song Track \n& Place, duplicate, and organize beat and melody patterns in the Playlist to build a fuller track structure.\n& \\href{https://www.image-line.com/learn/lesson/arranging-a-track-in-the-playlist}{Official Tutorial} \\\\\n& 04 Mixer \n& Route instruments to Mixer inserts and apply effects such as reverb and delay using FL Studio's Mixer.\n& \\href{https://www.image-line.com/learn/lesson/adding-effects-in-the-mixer}{Official Tutorial} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{3}{=}{05 \\textbf{Excel}} \n& 01 SUMIFS\n& Use SUMIFS to compute total revenue filtered by multiple conditions across a raw sales dataset.\n& \\href{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPajIyavh_0}{Online Tutorial} \\\\\n& 02 VLOOKUP \n& Link two tables with VLOOKUP to auto-fetch prices, categories, and tax rates for revenue calculations.\n& \\href{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3BYVQ6xIE4}{Online Tutorial} \\\\\n& 03 Pivot Table \n& Summarize a dataset into multiple pivot views and charts to answer distinct business questions.\n& \\href{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdJzy956wo4}{Online Tutorial} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabularx}\n\\caption{Overview of tasks used in the study.}\n\\label{tab:software_learning_tasks}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\section{Transcription}\n\\label{sec:transcription}\n\n\\noindent We use the automatically generated closed caption (i.e., \\texttt{.vtt} file) from Zoom as a starting point as it includes accurate timestamps, speaker labels (coach vs.\\ learner), and an initial segmentation of the dialogue. \n\n\\subsection{Transcript Correction}\n\\noindent We use an LLM (i.e., Gemini 3.1 Pro) to correct wrong words, homophone errors, dropped or extra words, or other mismatches with what is actually said. Prompt used for transcript correction can be found in Figure~\\ref{fig:autocorrect-transcription-prompt}. One author then manually validate the transcript to correct the speaker label and utterances. We use following notation to indicate pauses and interruptions: \n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item Use \\texttt{comma} (\\texttt{,}) to indicate a short speech pause or hesitation.\n \\item Use \\texttt{ellipsis} (\\texttt{...}) to indicate a longer pause or hesitation.\n \\item Use \\texttt{double dash} (\\texttt{--}) to indicate trailing off or interruption by another speaker.\n \\item Use \\texttt{parentheses} (\\texttt{( )}) to indicate an uncertain best-guess interpretation, e.g., \\texttt{(move)}. If no reasonable guess is available, leave the parentheses empty.\n \\item Use \\texttt{parentheses} (\\texttt{( )}) to replace any personal information, e.g., \\texttt{(facilitator)}.\n\\end{itemize}\nIn general, we will not annotate intonational features and non-spoken noises.\n\n\\subsection{Utterance Segmentation}\n\\noindent Three authors split and merged the corrected utterances according to the following guideline:\n\\begin{enumerate}\n \\item Split the utterance if there is a pause of 2 seconds or longer.\n \\item Use changes in intonation and what can be inferred from the semantics to decide whether to split for shorter pauses.\n \\begin{enumerate}\n \\item Descending pitch can be a hint that an utterance is ending.\n \\item If it is difficult to assign different functional meanings to two adjacent spans, they should likely be merged into one utterance.\n \\end{enumerate}\n \\item Context from the other speaker can also help (e.g., if one half of the utterance is responding directly to the other speaker, it may make sense to split).\n \\item Use the multimodal context to decide whether to split.\n \\begin{enumerate}\n \\item If a short pause coincides with a visible action in the screen state, this can be evidence for a new utterance.\n \\item If the screen state remains unchanged and there is only a pause shorter than 2 seconds, the utterances of the same speaker should generally be merged.\n \\end{enumerate}\n\\end{enumerate}\n\n\\subsection{Transcript Correction Interface}\n\\noindent The transcript correction interface screenshot is shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:transcript_correction_interface}.\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/appendix/transcript_correction_interface.png}\n \\caption{\n Transcription correction interface. Editor can see the dialogue transcript alongside screen recording. They can use the interface to edit, split, merge each utterance and trim its start and end time.\n }\n \\label{fig:transcript_correction_interface}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\section{Annotation}\n\\label{sec:annotation}\n\\subsection{Human Annotation Method}\n\\noindent To derive the taxonomy, three researchers used open coding on 200 turns to obtain potential coaching methods. Then, they met to merge together similar methods and create a codebook with a name, definition, and example for each coaching method. The researchers iteratively coded samples and revised the codebook to achieve final codes, containing 10 methods. During the coding process, we merged similar codes. Disagreements were resolved through discussion, and the finalized codebook was used for the annotations. Using the codebook with examples, three researchers annotated other 200 utterances and reached a substantial agreement for coaching methods.\n\n\\subsection{Dialogue Acts Schema}\n\\noindent The full dialogue acts definitions and examples provided to annotators are shown in Table~\\ref{tab:dialogue_act_schema}.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/dialogue_cohen.png}\n \\caption{\n Pairwise Cohen's \\(\\kappa\\) agreement among three human raters and three model annotators for dialogue act annotation. Rows and columns denote annotators, and each cell reports the pairwise agreement score. GPT-5.4 aligns with human rater the best.\n }\n \\label{fig:dialogue_cohen}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{5pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.15}\n\\begin{tabular}{p{3.0cm} p{8.2cm} p{4.3cm}}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Tag} & \\textbf{Definition} & \\textbf{Example} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\n\\textbf{Info Request}\n& Seeks information, clarification, or confirmation from the addressee.\n& \\textit{``What do you want to do with them?''} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Action Directive}\n& Guides the addressee toward an action.\n& \\textit{``Click on the top menu.''} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Answer}\n& Provides information requested by a previous utterance.\n& \\textit{``Because the polygon is not closed.''} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Inform}\n& Provides objective information or describes the current state.\n& \\textit{``The tempo is set to 120 BPM.''} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Opinion}\n& Provides a subjective judgment, preference, or interpretation.\n& \\textit{``The alignment looks better now.''} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Backchannel}\n& Signals attention, understanding, agreement, or receipt.\n& \\textit{``Okay.''} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Not Enough Info}\n& Is too incomplete or ambiguous to classify reliably.\n& \\textit{``If you just---''} \\\\\n\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\caption{Dialogue act schema used to annotate coach and learner utterances.}\n\\label{tab:dialogue_act_schema}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\subsection{Coaching Methods Schema}\n\\noindent The full coaching methods definitions and examples provided to annotators are shown in Table~\\ref{tab:coaching_method_schema}.\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{5pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.15}\n\\begin{tabular}{p{3cm} p{8cm} p{4.3cm}}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Tag} & \\textbf{Definition} & \\textbf{Example} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\n\\textbf{Direct Instruction}\n& Gives concrete procedural guidance about next action to take.\n& \\textit{``Click Sketch, and then select that edge.''} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Plan}\n& Proposes a subgoal without specifying the exact action.\n& \\textit{``Let's first make the basic shape, then add the details.''} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\n\\textbf{Confirmation}\n& Provides affirmation on the learner’s action, result, or understanding.\n& \\textit{``Yes, that shape looks correct now.''} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Diagnosis}\n& Provides feedback on the learner’s current state or identifies a problem.\n& \\textit{``The sketch isn't closed, so the software can't generate a solid.''} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\n\\textbf{Explanation}\n& Explains a concept, tool, feature, or reason behind an action or outcome.\n& \\textit{``We use Extrude here because it turns a 2D profile into a 3D solid.''} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Tip}\n& Provides a transferable shortcut, heuristic, or practical technique.\n& \\textit{``It's often easier to model one side first and then mirror it.''} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\n\\textbf{Clarification}\n& Asks about the learner's goal, confusion, current state, or intended next step before giving guidance.\n& \\textit{``Does this make sense to you?''} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Reflection}\n& Prompts the learner to evaluate an outcome, compare alternatives, or consider what happened.\n& \\textit{``Looking at the result, what do you think went wrong?''} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Articulation}\n& Prompts the learner to verbalize their reasoning, plan, or decision process.\n& \\textit{``Can you walk me through your reasoning?''} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Exploration}\n& Invites the learner to experiment, choose among alternatives, or practice themselves.\n& \\textit{``Try a couple of options and see which one you like better.''} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\n\\textbf{Non-Instructive}\n& Talks about task-irrelevant topics or filler.\n& \\textit{``The internet is not good.''} \\\\\n\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\caption{Coaching method schema used to annotate expert instructional behavior.}\n\\label{tab:coaching_method_schema}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/coaching_cohen.png}\n \\caption{\n Pairwise Cohen's \\(\\kappa\\) agreement among three human raters and three model annotators for coaching method annotation. Rows and columns denote annotators, and each cell reports the pairwise agreement score. GPT-5.4 aligns with human rater the best.\n }\n \\label{fig:coaching_cohen}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Additional Annotation Results}\n\\label{sec:additional-annotation}\n\\noindent \nFigure~\\ref{fig:dialogue_acts_coach} shows the distribution of dialogue acts of coaches across conversation progress. \nFigure~\\ref{fig:dialogue_acts_learner} shows the distribution of dialogue acts of learners across conversation progress. Figure~\\ref{fig:coaching_method} shows the distribution of coaching methods across conversation progress. Figure~\\ref{fig:bigram} shows top-10 most frequent coaching method\nbigrams..\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/appendix/dialogue_acts_progress_coach.pdf}\n \\caption{\n Distribution of dialogue acts of coaches across conversation progress.\n Method use remains relatively stable as the conversation progresses, except for the beginning and the end 10\\%.\n }\n \\label{fig:dialogue_acts_coach}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/appendix/dialogue_acts_progress_learner.pdf}\n \\caption{\n Distribution of dialogue acts of learners across conversation progress.\n Dialogue acts remain relatively stable as the conversation progresses, except for the beginning and the end 10\\%.\n }\n \\label{fig:dialogue_acts_learner}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/appendix/coaching_methods_progress_coach.pdf}\n \\caption{\n Distribution of coaching methods across conversation progress.\n Method use remains relatively stable as the conversation progresses, except for the beginning and the end 10\\%.\n }\n \\label{fig:coaching_method}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/appendix/coaching_method_2gram_transitions.pdf}\n \\caption{Top-10 most frequent coaching method bigrams.}\n \\label{fig:bigram}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Annotation Interface}\n\\noindent The annotation interface screenshot is shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:annotation_interface}.\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/appendix/annotation_interface.png}\n \\caption{\n Annotation interface for utterance labeling. Annotators can see the dialogue transcript alongside screen recording and assign tags to each utterance.\n }\n \\label{fig:annotation_interface}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\section{Additional Evaluation Results}\n\\label{sec:additional-eval}\n\n\\noindent Table~\\ref{tab:ngram-jsd} shows Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) for dialogue-act and coaching-method n-gram distributions. Table~\\ref{tab:bleu_ablation} shows BLEU results for next coach utterance generation. Table~\\ref{tab:meteor_ablation} shows METEOR results for next coach utterance generation. Table~\\ref{tab:rouge_l_ablation} shows ROUGE-L results for next coach utterance generation. Table~\\ref{tab:bertscore_ablation} shows BERTScore results for next coach utterance generation. Table~\\ref{tab:domain_clair_base} shows CLAIR scores (Default) split by software application. Table~\\ref{tab:method_clair_base} shows CLAIR scores (Default) split by coaching method.\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3.8pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.08}\n\\begin{tabular}{llcccccc}\n\\toprule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Label Type}} \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Model}} \n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{1-Gram}} \n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{2-Gram}} \n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{3-Gram}} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){3-4}\\cmidrule(lr){5-6}\\cmidrule(lr){7-8}\n& & \\textbf{V} & \\textbf{C} & \\textbf{V} & \\textbf{C} & \\textbf{V} & \\textbf{C} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\n\\multirow{6}{*}{\\textbf{Dialogue Acts}}\n& \\textbf{GPT-5.4}\n& 0.513\n& 0.472\n& 0.709\n& 0.681\n& 0.839\n& 0.824 \\\\\n\n& \\textbf{Gemini-3-Flash}\n& \\underline{0.257}\n& 0.251\n& \\underline{0.454}\n& 0.443\n& 0.644\n& 0.641 \\\\\n\n& \\textbf{Gemini-3.1-Pro}\n& \\textbf{0.235}\n& \\textbf{0.204}\n& \\textbf{0.427}\n& \\textbf{0.386}\n& \\underline{0.641}\n& \\textbf{0.605} \\\\\n\n& \\textbf{Claude-Sonnet-4.6}\n& \\underline{0.257}\n& \\underline{0.207}\n& 0.456\n& \\underline{0.396}\n& 0.657\n& \\underline{0.612} \\\\\n\n& \\textbf{Qwen-3-VL-Instruct}\n& 0.283\n& 0.346\n& 0.473\n& 0.553\n& \\textbf{0.639}\n& 0.708 \\\\\n\n& \\textbf{Llama-4-Scout}\n& 0.336\n& 0.371\n& 0.541\n& 0.589\n& 0.693\n& 0.738 \\\\\n\n\\midrule\n\n\\multirow{6}{*}{\\textbf{Coaching Methods}}\n& \\textbf{GPT-5.4}\n& 0.635\n& 0.587\n& 0.827\n& 0.790\n& 0.931\n& 0.910 \\\\\n\n& \\textbf{Gemini-3-Flash}\n& \\underline{0.246}\n& \\underline{0.240}\n& \\underline{0.461}\n& \\underline{0.459}\n& \\underline{0.694}\n& \\textbf{0.692} \\\\\n\n& \\textbf{Gemini-3.1-Pro}\n& 0.259\n& \\textbf{0.212}\n& 0.481\n& \\textbf{0.438}\n& 0.729\n& \\underline{0.700} \\\\\n\n& \\textbf{Claude-Sonnet-4.6}\n& 0.301\n& 0.255\n& 0.538\n& 0.491\n& 0.781\n& 0.753 \\\\\n\n& \\textbf{Qwen-3-VL-Instruct}\n& \\textbf{0.225}\n& 0.279\n& \\textbf{0.439}\n& 0.503\n& \\textbf{0.656}\n& 0.707 \\\\\n\n& \\textbf{Llama-4-Scout}\n& 0.306\n& 0.329\n& 0.547\n& 0.578\n& 0.744\n& 0.768 \\\\\n\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\caption{Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) for dialogue act and coaching method $n$-gram distributions under Vanilla (V) and Coach (C) conditions. JSD is bounded in $[0, 1]$; lower values indicate closer alignment with human coach turns, with $0$ corresponding to identical distributions. Bold scores indicate the lowest value and underlined scores indicate the second-lowest value within each label type and column.}\n\\label{tab:ngram-jsd}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.08}\n\\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{lcccccccc}\n\\toprule\n& & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{Modality}} \n& \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\textbf{Context}} \n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{Prompt}} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){3-4}\\cmidrule(lr){5-7}\\cmidrule(lr){8-9}\n\\textbf{Model} \n& \\textbf{Default} \n& \\textbf{Text-Only} \n& \\textbf{Image-Only} \n& \\textbf{1s} \n& \\textbf{10s} \n& \\textbf{60s} \n& \\textbf{Vanilla} \n& \\textbf{Coach} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\n\\textbf{GPT-5.4}\n& 0.0150$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0150$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0130$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0130$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0150$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0150$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0120$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0120$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Gemini-3-Flash}\n& \\underline{0.0180$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$}\n& 0.0180$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& \\underline{0.0150$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$}\n& \\underline{0.0160$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$}\n& \\underline{0.0170$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$}\n& \\underline{0.0180$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$}\n& \\underline{0.0140$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$}\n& \\underline{0.0140$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Gemini-3.1-Pro}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.0250$_{\\pm \\text{0.0020}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.0280$_{\\pm \\text{0.0030}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.0170$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.0210$_{\\pm \\text{0.0020}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.0230$_{\\pm \\text{0.0020}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.0270$_{\\pm \\text{0.0030}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.0180$_{\\pm \\text{0.0020}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.0190$_{\\pm \\text{0.0020}}$} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Claude-Sonnet-4.6}\n& 0.0170$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& \\underline{0.0220$_{\\pm \\text{0.0020}}$}\n& 0.0140$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0150$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& \\underline{0.0170$_{\\pm \\text{0.0020}}$}\n& 0.0170$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0130$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& \\underline{0.0140$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Qwen-3-VL-Instruct}\n& 0.0160$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0150$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0130$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0140$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0160$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0160$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0130$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0130$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Llama-4-Scout}\n& 0.0160$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0170$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0130$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0140$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0150$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0160$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0110$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$\n& 0.0110$_{\\pm \\text{0.0010}}$ \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}%\n}\n\\caption{BLEU scores (mean $\\pm$ 95\\% CI) for next coach utterance generation. The default setting uses text-image input, 30s context, and oracle prompt. Other columns report ablations over modality, context window, and prompt condition. Bold values indicate the best score per column, and underlined values indicate the second-highest score.}\n\\label{tab:bleu_ablation}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.08}\n\\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{lcccccccc}\n\\toprule\n& & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{Modality}} \n& \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\textbf{Context}} \n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{Prompt}} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){3-4}\\cmidrule(lr){5-7}\\cmidrule(lr){8-9}\n\\textbf{Model} \n& \\textbf{Default} \n& \\textbf{Text-Only} \n& \\textbf{Image-Only} \n& \\textbf{1s} \n& \\textbf{10s} \n& \\textbf{60s} \n& \\textbf{Vanilla} \n& \\textbf{Coach} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\n\\textbf{GPT-5.4}\n& 0.136$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.134$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.120$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.121$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.133$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.134$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.105$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.108$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Gemini-3-Flash}\n& 0.140$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.139$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& \\underline{0.124$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$}\n& 0.128$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.138$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.142$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.115$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.111$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Gemini-3.1-Pro}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.165$_{\\pm \\text{0.006}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.171$_{\\pm \\text{0.006}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.126$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.143$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.158$_{\\pm \\text{0.006}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.169$_{\\pm \\text{0.006}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.136$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.136$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Claude-Sonnet-4.6}\n& \\underline{0.149$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$}\n& \\underline{0.164$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.126$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$}\n& \\underline{0.134$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$}\n& \\underline{0.147$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$}\n& \\underline{0.152$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$}\n& \\underline{0.126$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$}\n& \\underline{0.127$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Qwen-3-VL-Instruct}\n& 0.129$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.126$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.112$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.117$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.128$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.129$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.105$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.097$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Llama-4-Scout}\n& 0.125$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.134$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.115$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.120$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.123$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.121$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.095$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.089$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$ \\\\\n\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}%\n}\n\\caption{ROUGE\\mbox{-}L scores (mean $\\pm$ 95\\% CI) for next coach utterance generation. The default setting uses text-image input, 30s context, and oracle prompt. Other columns report ablations over modality, context window, and prompt condition. Bold values indicate the best score per column, and underlined values indicate the second-highest score.}\n\\label{tab:rouge_l_ablation}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.08}\n\\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{lcccccccc}\n\\toprule\n& & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{Modality}} \n& \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\textbf{Context}} \n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{Prompt}} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){3-4}\\cmidrule(lr){5-7}\\cmidrule(lr){8-9}\n\\textbf{Model} \n& \\textbf{Default} \n& \\textbf{Text-Only} \n& \\textbf{Image-Only} \n& \\textbf{1s} \n& \\textbf{10s} \n& \\textbf{60s} \n& \\textbf{Vanilla} \n& \\textbf{Coach} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\n\\textbf{GPT-5.4}\n& 0.143$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.141$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& \\underline{0.127$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$}\n& 0.127$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.141$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.144$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.107$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.106$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Gemini-3-Flash}\n& 0.144$_{\\pm \\text{0.006}}$\n& 0.146$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.125$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.130$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.142$_{\\pm \\text{0.006}}$\n& 0.147$_{\\pm \\text{0.006}}$\n& 0.116$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.109$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Gemini-3.1-Pro}\n& \\underline{0.164$_{\\pm \\text{0.007}}$}\n& \\underline{0.166$_{\\pm \\text{0.007}}$}\n& 0.126$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& \\underline{0.140$_{\\pm \\text{0.006}}$}\n& \\underline{0.157$_{\\pm \\text{0.007}}$}\n& \\underline{0.173$_{\\pm \\text{0.007}}$}\n& \\underline{0.138$_{\\pm \\text{0.006}}$}\n& \\underline{0.136$_{\\pm \\text{0.006}}$} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Claude-Sonnet-4.6}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.178$_{\\pm \\text{0.006}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.179$_{\\pm \\text{0.007}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.149$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.148$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.173$_{\\pm \\text{0.006}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.182$_{\\pm \\text{0.006}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.147$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.147$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Qwen-3-VL-Instruct}\n& 0.125$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.123$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.108$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.109$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.121$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.123$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.098$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.086$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Llama-4-Scout}\n& 0.116$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.142$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.114$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.127$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.117$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.113$_{\\pm \\text{0.005}}$\n& 0.091$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$\n& 0.079$_{\\pm \\text{0.004}}$ \\\\\n\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}%\n}\n\\caption{METEOR scores (mean $\\pm$ 95\\% CI) for next coach utterance generation. The default setting uses text-image input, 30s context, and oracle prompt. Other columns report ablations over modality, context window, and prompt condition. Bold values indicate the best score per column, and underlined values indicate the second-highest score.}\n\\label{tab:meteor_ablation}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.08}\n\\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{lcccccccc}\n\\toprule\n& & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{Modality}} \n& \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\textbf{Context}} \n& \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{Prompt}} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){3-4}\\cmidrule(lr){5-7}\\cmidrule(lr){8-9}\n\\textbf{Model} \n& \\textbf{Default} \n& \\textbf{Text-Only} \n& \\textbf{Image-Only} \n& \\textbf{1s} \n& \\textbf{10s} \n& \\textbf{60s} \n& \\textbf{Vanilla} \n& \\textbf{Coach} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\n\\textbf{GPT-5.4}\n& 0.840$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.839$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.836$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.836$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.840$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.840$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.834$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.835$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Gemini-3-Flash}\n& \\underline{0.846$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$}\n& \\underline{0.845$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$}\n& \\underline{0.843$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$}\n& \\underline{0.844$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$}\n& \\underline{0.845$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$}\n& \\underline{0.846$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$}\n& \\underline{0.839$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$}\n& \\underline{0.839$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Gemini-3.1-Pro}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.850$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.852$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.844$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.847$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.849$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.851$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.842$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 0.844$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Claude-Sonnet-4.6}\n& 0.841$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& \\underline{0.845$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$}\n& 0.837$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.840$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.842$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.842$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.835$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.836$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Qwen-3-VL-Instruct}\n& 0.841$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.840$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.837$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.838$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.840$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.840$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.837$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.837$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Llama-4-Scout}\n& 0.840$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.841$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.837$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.838$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.839$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.840$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.836$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$\n& 0.835$_{\\pm \\text{0.001}}$ \\\\\n\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}%\n}\n\\caption{BERTScore scores (mean $\\pm$ 95\\% CI) for next coach utterance generation. The default setting uses text-image input, 30s context, and oracle prompt. Other columns report ablations over modality, context window, and prompt condition. Bold values indicate the best score per column, and underlined values indicate the second-highest score.}\n\\label{tab:bertscore_ablation}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.08}\n\\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{lcccccc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Model}\n& \\textbf{Overall}\n& \\textbf{Figma}\n& \\textbf{Blender}\n& \\textbf{OnShape}\n& \\textbf{FL Studio}\n& \\textbf{Excel} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\n\\textbf{GPT-5.4}\n& 32.4$_{\\pm \\text{1.3}}$\n& 32.4$_{\\pm \\text{3.0}}$\n& 29.8$_{\\pm \\text{2.9}}$\n& 32.7$_{\\pm \\text{2.8}}$\n& \\underline{35.0$_{\\pm \\text{3.2}}$}\n& 32.5$_{\\pm \\text{3.0}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Gemini-3-Flash}\n& \\underline{33.9$_{\\pm \\text{1.4}}$}\n& \\underline{36.8$_{\\pm \\text{3.3}}$}\n& \\underline{30.6$_{\\pm \\text{3.0}}$}\n& \\underline{35.1$_{\\pm \\text{3.1}}$}\n& 33.7$_{\\pm \\text{3.4}}$\n& \\underline{33.2$_{\\pm \\text{3.1}}$} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Gemini-3.1-Pro}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 41.4$_{\\pm \\text{1.5}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 40.2$_{\\pm \\text{3.5}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 38.6$_{\\pm \\text{3.3}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 45.1$_{\\pm \\text{3.3}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 41.7$_{\\pm \\text{3.6}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 41.4$_{\\pm \\text{3.3}}$} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Claude-Sonnet-4.6}\n& 32.3$_{\\pm \\text{1.3}}$\n& 32.4$_{\\pm \\text{3.0}}$\n& 30.4$_{\\pm \\text{3.0}}$\n& 34.1$_{\\pm \\text{3.0}}$\n& 33.3$_{\\pm \\text{3.1}}$\n& 31.5$_{\\pm \\text{2.9}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Qwen-3-VL-Instruct}\n& 27.0$_{\\pm \\text{1.2}}$\n& 26.2$_{\\pm \\text{2.7}}$\n& 24.4$_{\\pm \\text{2.5}}$\n& 28.0$_{\\pm \\text{2.5}}$\n& 29.1$_{\\pm \\text{2.9}}$\n& 27.7$_{\\pm \\text{2.8}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Llama-4-Scout}\n& 19.5$_{\\pm \\text{1.0}}$\n& 19.8$_{\\pm \\text{2.3}}$\n& 17.3$_{\\pm \\text{2.0}}$\n& 19.0$_{\\pm \\text{1.9}}$\n& 21.9$_{\\pm \\text{2.5}}$\n& 19.8$_{\\pm \\text{2.2}}$ \\\\\n\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}%\n}\n\\caption{CLAIR scores (mean $\\pm$ 95\\% CI) by domain under the text+image input, 30s, Oracle condition. Bold values indicate the best score per column, and underlined values indicate the second-highest score.}\n\\label{tab:domain_clair_base}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.08}\n\\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{lccccccccccc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Model}\n& \\textbf{Overall}\n& \\textbf{Artic.}\n& \\textbf{Clarif.}\n& \\textbf{Confirm.}\n& \\textbf{Diagn.}\n& \\textbf{Direct}\n& \\textbf{Explan.}\n& \\textbf{Explor.}\n& \\textbf{Plan}\n& \\textbf{Reflect.}\n& \\textbf{Tip} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\n\\textbf{GPT-5.4}\n& 32.4$_{\\pm \\text{1.3}}$\n& 35.6$_{\\pm \\text{5.1}}$\n& 23.4$_{\\pm \\text{3.6}}$\n& \\underline{41.9$_{\\pm \\text{4.3}}$}\n& 23.2$_{\\pm \\text{3.5}}$\n& 32.1$_{\\pm \\text{4.1}}$\n& \\underline{38.6$_{\\pm \\text{4.3}}$}\n& 33.6$_{\\pm \\text{4.1}}$\n& 35.6$_{\\pm \\text{4.1}}$\n& 29.1$_{\\pm \\text{3.9}}$\n& 31.7$_{\\pm \\text{4.1}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Gemini-3-Flash}\n& \\underline{33.9$_{\\pm \\text{1.4}}$}\n& \\underline{40.6$_{\\pm \\text{5.4}}$}\n& \\underline{27.0$_{\\pm \\text{4.3}}$}\n& 37.6$_{\\pm \\text{4.4}}$\n& \\underline{30.0$_{\\pm \\text{4.4}}$}\n& 33.2$_{\\pm \\text{4.5}}$\n& 37.4$_{\\pm \\text{4.5}}$\n& \\underline{37.2$_{\\pm \\text{4.2}}$}\n& \\underline{38.4$_{\\pm \\text{4.6}}$}\n& \\underline{30.3$_{\\pm \\text{4.2}}$}\n& 29.0$_{\\pm \\text{4.3}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Gemini-3.1-Pro}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 41.4$_{\\pm \\text{1.5}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 48.8$_{\\pm \\text{5.7}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 34.0$_{\\pm \\text{4.7}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 51.4$_{\\pm \\text{4.8}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 34.0$_{\\pm \\text{4.4}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 39.9$_{\\pm \\text{4.8}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 42.8$_{\\pm \\text{4.7}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 46.6$_{\\pm \\text{4.5}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 43.7$_{\\pm \\text{4.6}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 37.0$_{\\pm \\text{4.9}}$}\n& \\textbf{\\boldmath 37.9$_{\\pm \\text{4.6}}$} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Claude-Sonnet-4.6}\n& 32.3$_{\\pm \\text{1.3}}$\n& 39.3$_{\\pm \\text{4.9}}$\n& 24.4$_{\\pm \\text{3.8}}$\n& 36.1$_{\\pm \\text{4.3}}$\n& 27.7$_{\\pm \\text{4.2}}$\n& \\underline{33.7$_{\\pm \\text{4.3}}$}\n& 36.0$_{\\pm \\text{4.2}}$\n& 34.5$_{\\pm \\text{4.2}}$\n& 33.3$_{\\pm \\text{4.2}}$\n& 28.2$_{\\pm \\text{3.8}}$\n& \\underline{32.1$_{\\pm \\text{4.1}}$} \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Qwen-3-VL-Instruct}\n& 27.0$_{\\pm \\text{1.2}}$\n& 28.1$_{\\pm \\text{4.5}}$\n& 19.5$_{\\pm \\text{2.9}}$\n& 33.0$_{\\pm \\text{4.1}}$\n& 19.7$_{\\pm \\text{2.8}}$\n& 24.4$_{\\pm \\text{3.5}}$\n& 32.3$_{\\pm \\text{4.1}}$\n& 28.7$_{\\pm \\text{3.7}}$\n& 33.2$_{\\pm \\text{4.0}}$\n& 26.0$_{\\pm \\text{3.5}}$\n& 25.8$_{\\pm \\text{3.7}}$ \\\\\n\n\\textbf{Llama-4-Scout}\n& 19.5$_{\\pm \\text{1.0}}$\n& 24.3$_{\\pm \\text{4.1}}$\n& 15.3$_{\\pm \\text{2.7}}$\n& 17.1$_{\\pm \\text{2.8}}$\n& 15.0$_{\\pm \\text{2.4}}$\n& 17.6$_{\\pm \\text{2.8}}$\n& 20.3$_{\\pm \\text{3.2}}$\n& 25.3$_{\\pm \\text{3.6}}$\n& 24.9$_{\\pm \\text{3.6}}$\n& 17.0$_{\\pm \\text{2.4}}$\n& 19.5$_{\\pm \\text{2.7}}$ \\\\\n\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}%\n}\n\\caption{CLAIR scores (mean $\\pm$ 95\\% CI) by coaching method under the Text+Image, 30s, Oracle condition. Bold values indicate the best score per column, and underlined values indicate the second-highest score.}\n\\label{tab:method_clair_base}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\subsection{Human Expert Evaluation Setup}\n\\label{sec:expert-eval-setup}\n\n\\noindent To ensure a fair comparison, all candidate utterances and prior chat messages are converted to audio via a AI text-to-speech voice.\nThe human expert evaluation interface screenshot is shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:annotation_interface}.\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/appendix/expert_eval_interface.png}\n \\caption{\n Human expert evaluation interface. Raters can see the the previous conversation and screen context and listen to AI-narrated candidate coaching utterances.\n }\n \\label{fig:expert-eval-interface}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Interactive Evaluation Setup}\n\\label{sec:ix-eval-setup}\n\\noindent Interactive evaluation system uses a browser client (React, Stream Video WebRTC) paired with a Python backend (Vision agents, FastAPI). A novice shares screen and audio, and the software coach agent joins the same call server-side (Figure~\\ref{fig:ix-eval-interface}). By default, we route model inference through OpenRouter, Deepgram speech-to-text, and ElevenLabs text-to-speech. Proactive check-ins fire every 20s. Sessions log model--learner transcripts for offline analysis.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/appendix/ix_eval_interface.png}\n \\caption{\n Interactive evaluation interface. A novice shares their screen and speaks over a live call. Model coach observes recent frames and dialogue and replies with audio.\n }\n \\label{fig:ix-eval-interface}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\section{Prompts}\n\\label{sec:prompts}\n\\noindent Figure~\\ref{fig:autocorrect-transcription-prompt} shows the automatic transcript correction prompt. \nFigure~\\ref{fig:dialogue-act-annotation-prompt} shows the automatic dialogue act annotation prompt. \nFigure~\\ref{fig:coaching-method-annotation-prompt} shows the automatic coaching method annotation prompt. \nFigure~\\ref{fig:next-coach-utterance-prompt} shows the next coach utterance generation prompt. \n\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\fbox{%\n\\begin{minipage}{0.94\\textwidth}\n\\vspace{0.8em}\n\n{\\normalsize\\textbf{Auto-Correct Transcription Prompt}}\n\n\\vspace{0.4em}\n\\hrule\n\\vspace{0.2em}\n\n\\small\n\\ttfamily\n\\begin{flushleft}\nYou are aligning a reference transcript to the actual speech in the attached audio.\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nThe JSON below is the reference transcript for this recording. Each object has timing, speaker labels, and a \"text\" field.\\\\\nThe \"text\" values may contain wrong words, homophone errors, dropped or extra words, or other mismatches with what is actually said.\\\\\nYour task is to correct the \"text\" field to match what is actually said contextually.\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nTask:\\\\\n1. Listen to the audio carefully.\\\\\n2. For each object \\textbf{in array order}, produce the wording that best matches what is spoken\\\\\n\\hspace*{1em}in the corresponding time range. Fix mistranscriptions only.\\\\\n3. Do \\textbf{NOT} invent new utterances, merge, or split segments. The number of strings you\\\\\n\\hspace*{1em}output must equal \\{n\\} (one corrected line per input object).\\\\\n4. Do \\textbf{NOT} change punctuation style unnecessarily; natural English is fine.\\\\\n5. ONLY correct the \"text\" field; keep the same timing, speaker, and id.\\\\\n6. Use , to indicate short speech pauses or hesitation.\\\\\n7. Use ... to indicate a longer pause or hesitation.\\\\\n8. Use -- to indicate a trail off or being interrupted by another speaker.\\\\\n9. The first letter of the first word in the \"text\" field should be capitalized.\n\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nOutput requirements:\\\\\n- Return ONLY valid JSON: a single array of \\{n\\} strings.\\\\\n- String i is the corrected \"text\" for input object i (same order as the reference array).\\\\\n- No markdown, no code fences, no keys other than the array itself.\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nGood Examples:\\\\\n- \"bit, there's pill.\" -> \"bit, there's fill.\"\\\\\n- \"Cool. Mom. Gone.\" -> \"Cool. Mmmmm. Done.\"\\\\\n- \"It does sometimes take a second, so baby... huh.\" ->\\\\\n\\hspace*{1em}\"It does sometimes take a second, so maybe... huh.\"\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nReference transcript (do not echo it back; only output the string array):\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.4em}\n\\{reference\\_transcript\\}\n\\end{flushleft}\n\n\\vspace{0.8em}\n\\end{minipage}%\n}\n\\caption{Prompt used for automatic transcript correction.}\n\\label{fig:autocorrect-transcription-prompt}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\fbox{%\n\\begin{minipage}{0.94\\textwidth}\n\\vspace{0.8em}\n\n{\\normalsize\\textbf{Dialogue Act Annotation Prompt}}\n\n\\vspace{0.4em}\n\\hrule\n\\vspace{0.2em}\n\n\\small\n\\ttfamily\n\\begin{flushleft}\nYou are a linguistics expert annotating utterances from a task-oriented instructional dialogue.\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nYour job is to read each utterance from both Coach and Learner in context and decide what dialogue act the speaker is trying to do.\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nChoose all applicable labels from the schema below. Use the full transcript for context.\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nAnnotation Schema:\\\\\n\\{\\{DIALOGUE\\_ACTS\\}\\}\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nInstructions:\\\\\nFor each turn, return a JSON array of objects with these fields:\\\\\n- \\texttt{\"turn\\_id\"}: the turn number as an integer\\\\\n- \\texttt{\"text\"}: the original text of the turn\\\\\n- \\texttt{\"dialogue\\_acts\"}: an array of all applicable labels from the schema above\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nOutput requirements:\\\\\n- Return ONLY valid JSON as an array of objects.\\\\\n- Do not include markdown fences.\\\\\n- Do not include any extra text.\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nTranscript:\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.4em}\n\\{\\{TRANSCRIPT\\}\\}\n\\end{flushleft}\n\n\\vspace{0.8em}\n\\end{minipage}%\n}\n\\caption{Prompt used for automatic dialogue act annotation.}\n\\label{fig:dialogue-act-annotation-prompt}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\fbox{%\n\\begin{minipage}{0.94\\textwidth}\n\\vspace{0.8em}\n\n{\\normalsize\\textbf{Coaching Method Annotation Prompt}}\n\n\\vspace{0.4em}\n\\hrule\n\\vspace{0.2em}\n\n\\small\n\\ttfamily\n\\begin{flushleft}\nYou are an expert annotator annotating coach utterances from a task-oriented instructional dialogue.\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nYour job is to read each coach turn in context and decide which coaching method labels are used.\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nChoose all applicable labels from the schema below. Use the full transcript for context to understand what the coach is responding to, but only annotate Coach turns.\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nAnnotation Schema:\\\\\n\\{\\{COACHING\\_METHODS\\}\\}\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nInstructions:\\\\\nFor each coach turn, return a JSON array of objects with these fields:\\\\\n- \\texttt{\"turn\\_id\"}: the turn number as an integer\\\\\n- \\texttt{\"text\"}: the original text of the turn\\\\\n- \\texttt{\"coaching\\_methods\"}: an array of all applicable labels from the annotation classes\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nOutput requirements:\\\\\n- Return ONLY valid JSON as an array of objects.\\\\\n- Do not annotate Learner turns.\\\\\n- Do not include markdown fences.\\\\\n- Do not include any extra text.\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nTranscript:\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.4em}\n\\{\\{TRANSCRIPT\\}\\}\n\\end{flushleft}\n\n\\vspace{0.8em}\n\\end{minipage}%\n}\n\\caption{Prompt used for automatic coaching method annotation.}\n\\label{fig:coaching-method-annotation-prompt}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\fbox{%\n\\begin{minipage}{0.94\\textwidth}\n\\vspace{0.8em}\n\n{\\normalsize\\textbf{Next Coach Utterance Generation Prompt }}\n\n\\vspace{0.4em}\n\\hrule\n\\vspace{0.2em}\n\n\\small\n\\ttfamily\n% ---------------- System prompt ----------------\n\\noindent\\makebox[\\linewidth][c]{%\n\\colorbox{red!8}{%\n\\begin{minipage}{\\dimexpr0.96\\linewidth-2\\fboxsep\\relax}\n\\vspace{0.6em}\n\\textbf{System message:}\n\n\\vspace{0.5em}\nYou are an expert coach guiding a learner in a real-time computer use coaching session using \\{\\{SOFTWARE\\_TOOL\\}\\}.\\\\\nYour goal is not only to complete the current tutorial, but to help the learner develop skill so that they can solve similar problems on their own in the future.\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nYou are going to speak as the coach to continue the conversation.\\\\\n\\textcolor{blue}{You can choose the appropriate coaching method(s) defined in the following section to use in your response.}\\\\\nYou are looking at the learner's recent screen and you have your recent conversation with the learner.\\\\\nThe cursor is where the learner is currently interacting with the software.\\\\\nIf there are any visual pink color screen annotations, those are your previous annotations to the learner's screen. You can use them to guide your response.\\\\\nYour response should sound like something a human coach would actually say aloud in real-time during the session.\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nGeneration Rules:\\\\\n- Give one concise sentence as your response.\\\\\n- Treat the chat history as a live conversation (user = Learner, assistant = Coach).\\\\\n- Avoid overly verbose and overly formal language.\\\\\n- Avoid any special characters or markdown formatting like lists, bold, italic, etc.\\\\\n- Avoid transcript artifacts such as ellipses, dashes.\\\\\n- Do not mention being an AI, model, assistant, or system.\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nOutput Rules:\\\\\n- Return ONLY the coach utterance as plain text.\\\\\n- No JSON, no speaker prefix, no markdown.\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\n\\textcolor{blue}{Coaching Method Definitions and Examples:}\\\\\n\\textcolor{blue}{\\{\\{COACHING\\_METHODS\\_DEFINITION\\_AND\\_EXAMPLES\\}\\}}\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.6em}\nTask Description:\\\\\n\\{\\{TASK\\_DESCRIPTION\\}\\}\n\\end{minipage}%\n}%\n}\n\n\\vspace{0.3em}\n\n% ---------------- Chat history ----------------\n\\noindent\\makebox[\\linewidth][c]{%\n\\colorbox{orange!12}{%\n\\begin{minipage}{\\dimexpr0.96\\linewidth-2\\fboxsep\\relax}\n\\vspace{0.6em}\n\\textbf{User message: Dialogue History}\n\n\\vspace{0.5em}\nRecent \\{\\{CONTEXT\\_WINDOW\\}\\} dialogue history (ordered from earliest to most recent): \\\\\n\n\\{\\{Learner turns are shown as User messages. Coach turns are shown as Assistant messages.\\}\\}\n\\end{minipage}%\n}%\n}\n\n\\vspace{0.3em}\n\n% ---------------- Multimodal data ----------------\n\\noindent\\makebox[\\linewidth][c]{%\n\\colorbox{yellow!18}{%\n\\begin{minipage}{\\dimexpr0.96\\linewidth-2\\fboxsep\\relax}\n\\vspace{0.6em}\n\\textbf{User message: Visual Context}\n\n\\vspace{0.5em}\nRecent \\{\\{CONTEXT\\_WINDOW\\}\\} learner's recent screen (ordered from earliest to most recent):\\\\\n\n\\vspace{0.4em}\n\\{\\{RECENT\\_SCREEN\\_FRAMES\\}\\}\n\\end{minipage}%\n}%\n}\n\n\\vspace{0.3em}\n\n% ---------------- Prediction request ----------------\n\\noindent\\makebox[\\linewidth][c]{%\n\\colorbox{blue!8}{%\n\\begin{minipage}{\\dimexpr0.96\\linewidth-2\\fboxsep\\relax}\n\\vspace{0.6em}\n\\textbf{User message: Final Instruction}\n\n\\vspace{0.5em}\nYou are going to speak as the coach to continue the conversation.\\\\\n\\textcolor{orange}{Choose the most appropriate coaching method(s) and give your coaching utterance. ONLY return the coaching utterance, no coaching method tags.}\\\\\n\\textcolor{red}{Your next coach utterance should use the following coaching method(s):\\\\\n\\{\\{COACHING\\_METHODS\\}\\}}\n\\vspace{0.6em}\n\\end{minipage}%\n}%\n}\n\n\\end{minipage}%\n}\n\\caption{Prompt structure for next coach utterance generation, including \\colorbox{red!8}{system prompt}, \\colorbox{orange!12}{recent dialogue}, \\colorbox{yellow!18}{recent screen context}, and \\colorbox{blue!8}{final instruction}. Colored text marks prompt condition additions: \\textcolor{blue}{blue} for both Coach and Oracle prompts, \\textcolor{orange}{orange} for Coach only, and \\textcolor{red}{red} for Oracle only.}\n\\label{fig:next-coach-utterance-prompt}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n% \\section{Task Outcome Examples}\n% \\label{sec:task-outcome-examples}\n% \\begin{table*}[t]\n% \\centering\n% \\small\n% \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{5pt}\n% \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.12}\n% \\begin{tabular}{lcccccc}\n% \\toprule\n% \\textbf{Task} \n% & \\textbf{H1} \n% & \\textbf{H2} \n% & \\textbf{H3} \n% & \\textbf{H4} \n% & \\textbf{A1} \n% & \\textbf{H2} \\\\\n% \\midrule\n% \\textbf{Task 1} & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n% \\textbf{Task 2} & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n% \\textbf{Task 3} & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n% \\textbf{Task 4} & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n% \\textbf{Task 5} & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- & -- \\\\\n% \\bottomrule\n% \\end{tabular}\n% \\caption{Task outcome comparison between human coaching sessions and AI coaching sessions. Outcomes are grouped by completion level for each task.}\n% \\label{tab:ai-human-task-outcomes}\n% \\end{table*}\n\n\n\n\\section{Additional Human Coaching Results}\n\\label{sec:add-learn-outcome-results}\n\\subsection{Problematic Outcome Tags}\n\\noindent Table~\\ref{tab:learning-tags-human-model} shows problematic outcome tags for human and model coaching sessions.\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.08}\n\n\\begin{tabular}{llccc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Tag} \n& \\textbf{Setup} \n& \\textbf{Tutorial Task} \n& \\textbf{Pre-Task} \n& \\textbf{Post-Task} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Gave up}\n& H & 0 (0.0\\%) & 19 (26.4\\%) & 0 (0.0\\%) \\\\\n& M & 15 (41.7\\%) & 31 (86.1\\%) & 17 (47.2\\%) \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Wrong method}\n& H & 0 (0.0\\%) & 17 (23.6\\%) & 2 (2.8\\%) \\\\\n& M & 3 (8.3\\%) & 7 (19.4\\%) & 2 (5.6\\%) \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Mistakes}\n& H & 0 (0.0\\%) & 3 (4.2\\%) & 5 (6.9\\%) \\\\\n& M & 5 (13.9\\%) & 0 (0.0\\%) & 7 (19.4\\%) \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Missed steps}\n& H & 0 (0.0\\%) & 2 (2.8\\%) & 8 (11.1\\%) \\\\\n& M & 7 (19.4\\%) & 0 (0.0\\%) & 9 (25.0\\%) \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\n\\caption{Problematic outcome tags for human coaching sessions (H; $N=72$) and model coaching sessions (M; $N=36$). Tags are not mutually exclusive.}\n\\label{tab:learning-tags-human-model}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\subsection{Pre/Post Task Outcome Examples}\n\\noindent Table~\\ref{tab:learning_outcomes} shows examples of pre-task and post-task outcomes in visual tasks (Figma, Blender, OnShape).\n\n\\begin{table*}[p]\n \\centering\n \\small\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.2}\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{5pt}\n \n \\renewcommand{\\tabularxcolumn}[1]{m{#1}}\n\n \\begin{tabularx}{\\textwidth}{@{}cccCCC@{}}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Software} & \\textbf{Task ID} & \\textbf{Session ID} & \\textbf{Target} & \\textbf{Pre-Task} & \\textbf{Post-Task} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \n Figma & 0104 & C1L1 & \n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{figures/learning_outcome/0105_target.png} &\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{figures/learning_outcome/0105_C1L1_pre.png} &\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{figures/learning_outcome/0105_C1L1_post.png} \\\\\n \n \\midrule\n \n Blender & 0202 & C5L5 & \n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{figures/learning_outcome/0202_target.png} &\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{figures/learning_outcome/0202_C5L5_pre.png} &\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{figures/learning_outcome/0202_C5L5_post.png} \\\\\n \n Blender & 0202 & C7L7 & \n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{figures/learning_outcome/0202_target.png} &\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{figures/learning_outcome/0202_C7L7_pre.png} &\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{figures/learning_outcome/0202_C7L7_post.png} \\\\\n \n \\midrule\n \n OnShape & 0302 & C8L8 & \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{figures/learning_outcome/0302_target.png} &\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{figures/learning_outcome/0302_C8L8_pre.png} &\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{figures/learning_outcome/0302_C8L8_post.png} \\\\\n \n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabularx}\n \n \\caption{Examples of pre-task and post-task outcomes in visual tasks (Figma, Blender, OnShape).}\n \\label{tab:learning_outcomes}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\subsection{Subjective Learning Outcome}\n\\noindent Learners reported substantially higher confidence after completing the tasks.\nAveraging confidence (7-scale likert score, 7 = very confident) increased from\n\\(\\mu_{\\mathrm{pre}}=2.49, \\sigma_{\\mathrm{pre}}=1.03\\) to\n\\(\\mu_{\\mathrm{post}}=5.90, \\sigma_{\\mathrm{post}}=0.90\\), with an average improvement of\n\\(\\mu_{\\mathrm{diff}}=3.41, \\sigma_{\\mathrm{diff}}=1.04\\).\nA non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed the increase is statistical significant \\(W=0, p<.001\\).\n\nCoaches rated whether learners had acquired the relevant software skill for the task (7-scale likert score, 7 = the learner was fully equipped to complete similar tasks independently). Coach-rated skill increased from\n\\(\\mu_{\\mathrm{pre}}=2.88, \\sigma_{\\mathrm{pre}}=2.06\\)\nto\n\\(\\mu_{\\mathrm{post}}=6.29, \\sigma_{\\mathrm{post}}=1.35\\),\nwith an average improvement of\n\\(\\mu_{\\mathrm{diff}}=3.42, \\sigma_{\\mathrm{diff}}=1.97\\).\nA Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed the increase was statistically significant\n\\(W=0, p<.001\\).\nIn total, 66 of 72 task instances received higher coach-rated skill scores after coaching, 6 stayed the same, and none decreased.\n\n\\subsection{Qualitative Feedback}\n\\noindent Across both learners (L1-L20) and coaches (C1-C20), participants described effective computer use coaching an activity beyond simply giving step-by-step answers. It was a balance between procedural and conceptual guidance, guided practice, and learner agency.\n\n Learners emphasized that practice was necessary for retention, especially after a dense coaching session. L10 noted that ``more practice would be helpful to re-enforce the things I learnt,'' because they were unsure ``for how long I will retain the knowledge if I am not practicing it regularly.'' Coaches echoed this point: C2 argued that ``more practice with new tools would help with retention,'' especially when learners first observe an effect and then reproduce it themselves with less guidance. This suggests that an effective digital coach should not only demonstrate procedures, but also create repeated opportunities for learners to apply newly learned operations.\n\nParticipants also emphasized that direct coaching is useful when learners lack basic orientation or do not know where to begin. L8 stated, ``I want direct teaching when I lack the basic knowledge of the software,'' while L20 found ``detailed step-by-step'' guidance helpful because each action was ``illustrated in a digestible way.'' Coaches similarly noted that in unfamiliar interfaces, direct pointing can reduce unnecessary friction. C13 explained that in Figma, many functions are difficult to find without prior familiarity, so ``it makes more sense to have those directly pointed out.'' However, participants also viewed direct instruction as only one part of effective teaching. L9 described a trade-off: direct answers are useful for ``simple procedural questions,'' but for design-related or conceptual tasks, they preferred ``guided exploration and explanation.'' Thus, digital coaches may need to dynamically shift between directive support and exploratory guidance depending on whether the learner’s immediate barrier is procedural, conceptual, or creative.\n\nAnother strong theme was that learners valued explanations of concepts, rationales, and tool functions, not only instructions about where to click. L17 said the coach first explained ``the function of a component'' and then showed ``how to operate,'' which strengthened both understanding and memory. C2 similarly argued that explanations and analogies help students understand ``what specific numbers or functions do, instead of just clicking mindlessly through the steps.'' Learners particularly valued explanations that made knowledge transferable. L10 appreciated learning ``strategies and thought processes'' in CAD that could transfer to other tasks. L8 described how understanding the difference between ``extrude vs. revolve'' helped them narrow down tool choices in a later post-task. L9 similarly said effective moments focused not only on how to complete the task, but also on why a certain approach works, making the knowledge transferable.\n\nParticipants also highlighted the importance of guided exploration, reflection, and learner agency. L9 described effective teaching as ``guidance that helped me think rather than directly giving the answer,'' using ``minimal but meaningful cues'' that allowed them to solve problems independently. C9 similarly described effective teaching as giving the learner ``time to explore and think about the concepts'' and then synthesize them individually. C20 preferred being able to ask learners questions rather than ``just tell them what to do,'' describing coaching as ``collaborative.'' Several learners valued moments where they tried, failed, and were corrected. L17 described ``practicing, failing, learning what is actually correct, and then doing it again'' as the best method because it forced them to think and understand what was wrong or right. L4 also found it most helpful when they tried to replicate what the coach taught, got stuck, and then received correction.\n\nVisual grounding and screen annotation were repeatedly described as important for online computer use coaching. C12 said Zoom annotations were ``incredibly helpful'' because the coach could draw squares, arrows, and visual references without physically obstructing the screen. L13 said annotation made it easier to navigate the toolbar and find correct buttons, while L12 described screen annotations as ``very effective in visually guiding me through the activity.'' C2 described a useful pattern: first explain the concept, then annotate where to click with arrows or circles.\n\n\\section{Artifact Licenses, Terms of Use, and Intended Use}\n\\label{app:artifact-license-use}\n\n\\noindent Our work uses and creates several scientific artifacts: the \\system{} dataset,\nthe software-task materials used to elicit coaching sessions, model outputs from\nthe evaluated multimodal language models, and annotation/evaluation code. The\n\\system{} dataset is intended for research on situated, multimodal\ncomputer use coaching, human--AI collaboration, language grounding in graphical user\ninterfaces, and pedagogical dialogue. It is not intended for use in systems that\nidentify, profile, surveil, evaluate, or make consequential decisions about\nindividual participants.\n\nFor artifacts created by this work, we will release only de-identified research\ndata and accompanying documentation under a research-use license. The release\nwill include derived and anonymized metadata, dialogue annotations, task\nmetadata, model generations, and benchmark/evaluation scripts where permitted.\nRaw participant-identifying information, including names, contact information,\nand any uniquely identifying content observed in transcripts, screen recordings,\nor files, will not be released. All transcripts are manually reviewed for\npersonally identifying information and redacted before release. Access to any\nhigher-risk modalities, such as screen recordings or file snapshots, will be\nrestricted to research use and subject to the dataset terms of use.\n\nFor existing artifacts, including the software applications, tutorials, APIs,\nmodels, and evaluation packages used in this study, our use was limited to\nresearch and evaluation. We followed the applicable licenses, API terms, and\nplatform policies for each artifact. We cite the creators of datasets,\nbenchmarks, models, and methods used in the paper where applicable. The use of\ntutorial-derived task materials was limited to creating study tasks and was not\nused to redistribute the original tutorials themselves. Model outputs are used\nonly for research evaluation of coaching behavior and are not presented as\nauthoritative instructions for end users.\n\n\n\\section{Experimental Settings and Package Parameters}\n\\label{app:package-settings}\n\n\\noindent All model generations used the default settings of the corresponding model\nprovider unless otherwise specified. We did not perform hyperparameter search\nover decoding parameters. Instead, we compared prompting conditions, input\nmodalities, and context-window lengths as experimental factors. Specifically, we\ncompared vanilla, coach, and oracle prompts; text-only, image-only, and\ntext--visual context; and context windows of 1, 10, 30, and 60 seconds. The\ndefault automatic-evaluation setting used text--visual input, a 30-second\ncontext window, and the oracle prompt. The default interactive setting used\nGemini-3-Flash, the vanilla prompt, a 10-second context window, and visual\nsampling at 1 frame per second.\n\nFor automatic evaluation, we used CLAIR, BLEU, METEOR, ROUGE-L, BERTScore,\nSelf-BLEU, Vendi Score, MAUVE, Cohen's $\\kappa$, Fleiss' $\\kappa$, and F1 as\nreported in the paper. Unless otherwise stated, we used the default parameter\nsettings from the corresponding public implementations. The exact package names,\nversions, and command-line arguments are provided in our released code and\nconfiguration files. We used GPT-4.1 as the judge model for CLAIR scoring in the\nautomatic next-utterance evaluation.\n\n\\FloatBarrier\n\n% \\section{Human Subjects, Consent, and Data Protection}\n% \\label{app:consent}\n\n% All human data collection and evaluation protocols were reviewed and approved by\n% our institution's Institutional Review Board. Participants were recruited through\n% professional networks and Upwork. The study involved expert coaches, novice\n% learners, and expert evaluators. Before participating, all participants were\n% given study instructions describing the study purpose, the tasks they would\n% perform, the types of data collected, and how their data would be used for\n% research. Participants provided informed consent before data collection began.\n\n% The collected data included spoken dialogue, transcripts, screen recordings,\n% input events, task files or file snapshots, study metadata, annotations, and\n% pre-/post-task outcomes. Participants were informed that these data would be used\n% to study human expert--novice computer use coaching and to evaluate computational\n% models of situated coaching. Participants were also informed that released data\n% would be de-identified and that personally identifying information would not be\n% included in public artifacts. Participants could ask questions before beginning\n% the study and could stop participating according to the approved study protocol.\n\n% To protect participants, we manually reviewed transcripts and other releasable\n% materials for personally identifying information and redacted such information\n% before release. We do not release names, contact information, or other uniquely\n% identifying participant information. Because screen recordings and file snapshots\n% may contain incidental sensitive information, we apply additional review and\n% access controls to these modalities and release them only in de-identified or\n% restricted research-use form where permitted by the consent protocol and IRB\n% approval. Compensation was set based on the expected duration and complexity of\n% the tasks, participant expertise, and average market rates for comparable work.\n\n% The consent forms are included on the following pages.\n\n% \\includepdf[\n% pages=-,\n% pagecommand={},\n% width=\\textwidth\n% ]{consent_forms/human-human-redacted.pdf}\n\n% \\includepdf[\n% pages=-,\n% pagecommand={},\n% width=\\textwidth\n% ]{consent_forms/human-agent-redacted.pdf}\n\n% \\includepdf[\n% pages=-,\n% pagecommand={},\n% width=\\textwidth\n% ]{consent_forms/media-release-redacted.pdf}\n\n\n\n\\section{AI Use Disclosure}\n\\label{app:ai}\n\n\\noindent The authors used AI-based tools to assist with code generation, editing, and writing during the preparation of this paper. Specifically, AI assistance was used to help draft and revise portions of the manuscript for clarity, grammar, and organization, and to support the development, debugging, and refinement of code used in the research workflow. All AI-generated or AI-assisted content, code, analyses, and interpretations were reviewed, verified, and, where necessary, modified by the authors. The authors take full responsibility for the accuracy, integrity, originality, and final content of the paper, including any code or text developed with AI assistance.\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091181,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31981"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31981"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Peng Li"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Peng Li, Rawal Khirodkar, Junxuan Li, Yuan Dong, Chen Cao, Yuan Liu, Wenhan Luo, Yike Guo, Shunsuke Saito"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"LUNA: Learning Universal 3D Human Animation Beyond Skinning"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"ECCV 2026, Project page: https://penghtyx.github.io/LUNA/"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.CV cs.AI"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Creating photorealistic, animatable 3D human avatars from monocular images still largely depends on Linear Blend Skinning (LBS) and parametric body models, which constrain expressivity and often introduce artifacts due to imperfect fitting. We propose LUNA, an LBS-free universal neural animation model that directly maps multiple 2D controls like images, keypoints, sketches, and unseen characters into 3D Gaussian deformations, bypassing explicit body fitting. At its core, a transformer-based motion regressor disentangles global rigid motion from fine-grained local dynamics to capture both coherent movement and subtle non-rigid effects. To resolve the inherent ambiguity of 2D-to-3D lifting while scaling beyond fitted datasets, we introduce hybrid supervision that distills soft structural priors from an LBS teacher and a loss that supports training on both limited fitted data and large in-the-wild unlabeled videos. Extensive experiments show LUNA achieves competitive visual fidelity compared to LBS-based approaches, while delivering realistic human motion and zero-shot cross-identity generalization across diverse driving modalities. To the best of our knowledge, LUNA is the first end-to-end 3D animatable model that supports implicit 2D driving."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:19:55 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:19:55 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Li","Peng",""],["Khirodkar","Rawal",""],["Li","Junxuan",""],["Dong","Yuan",""],["Cao","Chen",""],["Liu","Yuan",""],["Luo","Wenhan",""],["Guo","Yike",""],["Saito","Shunsuke",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Li\",\n \"Peng\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Khirodkar\",\n \"Rawal\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Li\",\n \"Junxuan\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Dong\",\n \"Yuan\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Cao\",\n \"Chen\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Liu\",\n \"Yuan\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Luo\",\n \"Wenhan\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Guo\",\n \"Yike\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Saito\",\n \"Shunsuke\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: eccv.sty\n================================================\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n%\n% Formatting Package for ECCV Submissions\n% \n% initially created for ECCV 2024\n% by Stefan Roth\n%\n% based on previous ECCV templates:\n% updated April 2002 by Antje Endemann\n% Based on CVPR 07 and LNCS, with modifications by DAF, AZ and elle, 2008 and AA, 2010, and CC, 2011; TT, 2014; AAS, 2016; AAS, 2020; TH, 2022\n%\n% and the CVPR templates:\n% https://github.com/cvpr-org/author-kit\n%\n% No guarantee is given that the format corresponds perfectly to\n% LNCS Proceedings, but most features should be ok.\n%\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n%\n% use as\n% \\documentclass[runningheads]{llncs}\n% \\usepackage[options]{eccv}\n%\n% \"options\" include\n% * \"review\" for submitting a paper for review and\n% * \"final\" for the camera ready (default).\n% * \"mobile\" for camera ready on small-screen devices\n% * \"year=20??\" allows to specify the conference year (default current year).\n% * \"ID=12345\" allows to specify the paper ID (default `none').\n%\n% specify references as\n% \\bibliographystyle{splncs04}\n% \\bibliography{...your files...}\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1999/12/01]\n\\ProvidesPackage{eccv}[LaTeX style for ECCV]\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Suppress unwanted warnings\n\n\\RequirePackage{silence} \n\\WarningFilter{amsmath}{Unable to redefine math accent \\vec}\n\\WarningFilter{caption}{Unknown document class (or package)}\n\\RequirePackage{etoolbox}\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Basic packages \n\n\\RequirePackage[T1]{fontenc} % Required to avoid font issues\n\\RequirePackage[left,mathlines]{lineno} % Support for line numbers\n\\RequirePackage[dvipsnames]{xcolor} % Color for line numbers\n\\RequirePackage{amsmath} % Need AMS packages to bug fix \n\\RequirePackage{amssymb} % line numbers in equations\n\\RequirePackage{cite} % Sort citations\n\\RequirePackage{xspace} \n\n% Breaking lines for URLs in the bib\n\\RequirePackage[hyphens]{url}\n\\Urlmuskip=0mu plus 1mu\\relax\n\n% Color for links and line numbers\n\\definecolor{eccvblue}{rgb}{0.12,0.49,0.85}\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Use modern caption package to allow for sub-figures etc.\n% Reproduces the original LNCS style as closely as possible.\n\n\\RequirePackage[labelfont=bf,font=small,tableposition=bottom]{caption}\n\\RequirePackage[skip=3pt]{subcaption}\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Process ECCV package options\n\n% Key value options\n\\RequirePackage{kvoptions}\n\\SetupKeyvalOptions{\n family=eccv,\n prefix=eccv@\n}\n\n\\DeclareBoolOption{review}\n\\DeclareComplementaryOption{final}{review}\n\\DeclareBoolOption{mobile}\n\\DeclareStringOption[\\the\\year]{year}\n\\DeclareStringOption[none]{ID}\n\\DeclareDefaultOption{\\PackageWarning{eccv}{Unkown option `\\CurrentOption'}}\n\\ProcessKeyvalOptions*\n\n% Enable processing options also in main paper with \\eccvsetup{ key=value, ... }\n\\newcommand*{\\eccvsetup}\n {\\setkeys{eccv}%\n}\n\n% Warn if ECCV package for review version is not loaded with paper ID option\n\\ifeccv@review\n \\ifdefstring{\\eccv@ID}{none}{%\n \\PackageWarningNoLine{eccv}{Review version requires a paper ID. Please load `eccv' package with `ID=*****' option and replace `*****' with your paper ID}\n }{}\n\\fi\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Basic error handling\n\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n % Print an error if document class other than llncs is used\n \\@ifclassloaded{llncs}{}{%\n \\PackageError{eccv}{Package only meant to be used with document class `llncs'}{Change document class to `llncs'.}\n }\n % Print a warning if incorrect options for llncs are specified\n \\@ifclasswith{llncs}{runningheads}{}{%\n \\PackageWarningNoLine{eccv}{Running heads incorrectly suppressed - ECCV requires running heads. Please load document class `llncs' with `runningheads' option}\n }\n % Print a warning if hyperref is not loaded and/or if the pagebackref option is missing\n \\ifeccv@review\n \\@ifpackageloaded{hyperref}{%\n \\@ifpackagewith{hyperref}{pagebackref}{}{%\n \\PackageWarningNoLine{eccv}{Package `hyperref' is not loaded with option `pagebackref', which is strongly recommended for review version}\n }\n }{%\n \\PackageWarningNoLine{eccv}{Package `hyperref' is not loaded, but strongly recommended for review version}\n }\n \\else\n \\@ifpackageloaded{hyperref}{%\n \\@ifpackagewith{hyperref}{pagebackref}{%\n \\PackageWarningNoLine{eccv}{Package `hyperref' is loaded with option `pagebackref', which is *not* recommended for camera-ready version}{}\n }{}\n }{%\n \\PackageWarningNoLine{eccv}{Package `hyperref' is not loaded, but highly recommended for camera-ready version}\n }\n \\fi\n}\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Line number support for the review version\n\n% NUMBER with left flushed zeros \\fillzeros[<WIDTH>]<NUMBER>\n% from CVPR template\n\\newcount\\cv@tmpc@ \\newcount\\cv@tmpc\n\\def\\fillzeros[#1]#2{\\cv@tmpc@=#2\\relax\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@<0\\cv@tmpc@=-\\cv@tmpc@\\fi\n\\cv@tmpc=1 %\n\\loop\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@<10 \\else \\divide\\cv@tmpc@ by 10 \\advance\\cv@tmpc by 1 \\fi\n \\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@=10\\relax\\cv@tmpc@=11\\relax\\fi \\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@>10 \\repeat\n\\ifnum#2<0\\advance\\cv@tmpc1\\relax-\\fi\n\\loop\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc<#1\\relax0\\advance\\cv@tmpc1\\relax\\fi \\ifnum\\cv@tmpc<#1 \\repeat\n\\cv@tmpc@=#2\\relax\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@<0\\cv@tmpc@=-\\cv@tmpc@\\fi \\relax\\the\\cv@tmpc@}%\n\n\n% colored, bold, sans serif line numbers\n\\renewcommand\\thelinenumber{\\color{eccvblue}\\normalfont\\sffamily\\scriptsize\\fillzeros[3]{\\arabic{linenumber}}\\color[rgb]{0,0,0}}\n% on both sides\n\\renewcommand\\makeLineNumber{\\hss\\thelinenumber\\ \\hspace{4.5mm} \\rlap{\\hskip\\textwidth\\ \\hspace{5mm}\\thelinenumber}}\n\n\n% Bug: An equation with $$ ... $$ isn't numbered, nor is the previous line.\n% Patch amsmath commands so that the previous line and the equation itself\n% are numbered. Bug: multiline has an extra line number.\n% https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/461186/how-to-use-lineno-with-amsmath-align\n\n%% Patch 'normal' math environments:\n\\newcommand*\\linenomathpatch[1]{%\n \\cspreto{#1}{\\linenomath}%\n \\cspreto{#1*}{\\linenomath}%\n \\csappto{end#1}{\\endlinenomath}%\n \\csappto{end#1*}{\\endlinenomath}%\n}\n%% Patch AMS math environments:\n\\newcommand*\\linenomathpatchAMS[1]{%\n \\cspreto{#1}{\\linenomathAMS}%\n \\cspreto{#1*}{\\linenomathAMS}%\n \\csappto{end#1}{\\endlinenomath}%\n \\csappto{end#1*}{\\endlinenomath}%\n}\n\n%% Definition of \\linenomathAMS depends on whether the mathlines option is provided\n\\expandafter\\ifx\\linenomath\\linenomathWithnumbers\n \\let\\linenomathAMS\\linenomathWithnumbers\n %% The following line gets rid of an extra line numbers at the bottom:\n \\patchcmd\\linenomathAMS{\\advance\\postdisplaypenalty\\linenopenalty}{}{}{}\n\\else\n \\let\\linenomathAMS\\linenomathNonumbers\n\\fi\n\n\\linenomathpatch{equation}\n\\linenomathpatchAMS{gather}\n\\linenomathpatchAMS{multline}\n\\linenomathpatchAMS{align}\n\\linenomathpatchAMS{alignat}\n\\linenomathpatchAMS{flalign}\n\n% Disable line numbering during measurement step of multline\n\\makeatletter\n\\patchcmd{\\mmeasure@}{\\measuring@true}{\n \\measuring@true\n \\ifnum-\\linenopenaltypar>\\interdisplaylinepenalty\n \\advance\\interdisplaylinepenalty-\\linenopenalty\n \\fi\n }{}{}\n\\makeatother\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Modifications to LNCS template for review version\n\n\\makeatletter\n\\ifeccv@review\n % Display line numbers\n \\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\linenumbers\n \\linenomathpatch{equation}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{gather}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{multline}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{align}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{alignat}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{flalign}%\n }\n\n % Crop the page for review version\n \\RequirePackage[width=122mm,left=12mm,paperwidth=146mm,height=193mm,top=12mm,paperheight=217mm]{geometry}\n\n % Replace authors, institute, and running title with review placeholders\n \\let\\maketitleold\\maketitle\n \\renewcommand{\\maketitle}{\\author{Anonymous ECCV \\eccv@year{} Submission}%\n \\titlerunning{ECCV \\eccv@year{} Submission \\#\\eccv@ID}% \n \\authorrunning{ECCV \\eccv@year{} Submission \\#\\eccv@ID}% \n \\institute{Paper ID \\#\\eccv@ID}%\n \\maketitleold}\n\\fi\n\n\\ifeccv@mobile\n % Crop the page for mobile version\n \\RequirePackage[width=122mm,left=12mm,paperwidth=146mm,height=193mm,top=12mm,paperheight=217mm]{geometry}\n\\fi\n\n% Macro for ECCV year in main text\n\\newcommand{\\ECCVyear}{\\eccv@year\\xspace}\n\\makeatother\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Support for easy cross-referencing (e.g., \\cref{eq:loss}, \\cref{sec:intro})\n% configured with \\AtEndPreamble as it needs to be called after hyperref\n\n\\AtEndPreamble{\n \\usepackage[capitalize]{cleveref}\n \\crefname{section}{Sec.}{Secs.}\n \\Crefname{section}{Section}{Sections}\n \\crefname{table}{Tab.}{Tabs.}\n \\Crefname{table}{Table}{Tables}\n}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: eccvabbrv.sty\n================================================\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n%\n% Formatting Package for ECCV Submissions\n% \n% initially created for ECCV 2024\n% by Stefan Roth\n%\n% based on previous ECCV templates:\n% updated April 2002 by Antje Endemann\n% Based on CVPR 07 and LNCS, with modifications by DAF, AZ and elle, 2008 and AA, 2010, and CC, 2011; TT, 2014; AAS, 2016; AAS, 2020; TH, 2022\n%\n% and the CVPR templates:\n% https://github.com/cvpr-org/author-kit\n%\n% No guarantee is given that the format corresponds perfectly to\n% LNCS Proceedings, but most features should be ok.\n%\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1999/12/01]\n\\ProvidesPackage{eccvabbrv}[Common abbreviations for ECCV]\n\n% Add a period to the end of an abbreviation unless there's one\n% already, then \\xspace.\n\\RequirePackage{xspace}\n\\makeatletter\n\\DeclareRobustCommand\\onedot{\\futurelet\\@let@token\\@onedot}\n\\def\\@onedot{\\ifx\\@let@token.\\else.\\null\\fi\\xspace}\n\n\\def\\eg{\\emph{e.g}\\onedot} \n\\def\\Eg{\\emph{E.g}\\onedot}\n\\def\\ie{\\emph{i.e}\\onedot} \n\\def\\Ie{\\emph{I.e}\\onedot}\n\\def\\cf{\\emph{cf}\\onedot} \n\\def\\Cf{\\emph{Cf}\\onedot}\n\\def\\etc{\\emph{etc}\\onedot} \n\\def\\vs{\\emph{vs}\\onedot}\n\\def\\wrt{w.r.t\\onedot} \n\\def\\dof{d.o.f\\onedot}\n\\def\\iid{i.i.d\\onedot} \n\\def\\wolog{w.l.o.g\\onedot}\n\\def\\etal{\\emph{et al}\\onedot}\n\\makeatother\n\n================================================\nFILE: llncs.cls\n================================================\n% LLNCS DOCUMENT CLASS -- version 2.22 (05-Sep-2022)\n% Springer Verlag LaTeX2e support for Lecture Notes in Computer Science\n%\n%%\n%% \\CharacterTable\n%% {Upper-case \\A\\B\\C\\D\\E\\F\\G\\H\\I\\J\\K\\L\\M\\N\\O\\P\\Q\\R\\S\\T\\U\\V\\W\\X\\Y\\Z\n%% Lower-case \\a\\b\\c\\d\\e\\f\\g\\h\\i\\j\\k\\l\\m\\n\\o\\p\\q\\r\\s\\t\\u\\v\\w\\x\\y\\z\n%% Digits \\0\\1\\2\\3\\4\\5\\6\\7\\8\\9\n%% Exclamation \\! Double quote \\\" Hash (number) \\#\n%% Dollar \\$ Percent \\% Ampersand \\&\n%% Acute accent \\' Left paren \\( Right paren \\)\n%% Asterisk \\* Plus \\+ Comma \\,\n%% Minus \\- Point \\. Solidus \\/\n%% Colon \\: Semicolon \\; Less than \\<\n%% Equals \\= Greater than \\> Question mark \\?\n%% Commercial at \\@ Left bracket \\[ Backslash \\\\\n%% Right bracket \\] Circumflex \\^ Underscore \\_\n%% Grave accent \\` Left brace \\{ Vertical bar \\|\n%% Right brace \\} Tilde \\~}\n%%\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1995/12/01]\n\\ProvidesClass{llncs}[2022/09/05 v2.22\n^^J LaTeX document class for Lecture Notes in Computer Science]\n% Options\n\\let\\if@envcntreset\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{envcountreset}{\\let\\if@envcntreset\\iftrue}\n\\DeclareOption{citeauthoryear}{\\let\\citeauthoryear=Y}\n\\DeclareOption{oribibl}{\\let\\oribibl=Y}\n\\let\\if@custvec\\iftrue\n\\DeclareOption{orivec}{\\let\\if@custvec\\iffalse}\n\\let\\if@envcntsame\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{envcountsame}{\\let\\if@envcntsame\\iftrue}\n\\let\\if@envcntsect\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{envcountsect}{\\let\\if@envcntsect\\iftrue}\n\\let\\if@runhead\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{runningheads}{\\let\\if@runhead\\iftrue}\n\n\\let\\if@openright\\iftrue\n\\let\\if@openbib\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{openbib}{\\let\\if@openbib\\iftrue}\n\n% languages\n\\let\\switcht@@therlang\\relax\n\\def\\ds@deutsch{\\def\\switcht@@therlang{\\switcht@deutsch}}\n\\def\\ds@francais{\\def\\switcht@@therlang{\\switcht@francais}}\n\n\\DeclareOption*{\\PassOptionsToClass{\\CurrentOption}{article}}\n\n\\ProcessOptions\n\n\\LoadClass[twoside]{article}\n\\RequirePackage{multicol} % needed for the list of participants, index\n\\RequirePackage{aliascnt}\n\n\\setlength{\\textwidth}{12.2cm}\n\\setlength{\\textheight}{19.3cm}\n\\renewcommand\\@pnumwidth{2em}\n\\renewcommand\\@tocrmarg{3.5em}\n%\n\\def\\@dottedtocline#1#2#3#4#5{%\n \\ifnum #1>\\c@tocdepth \\else\n \\vskip \\z@ \\@plus.2\\p@\n {\\leftskip #2\\relax \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg \\advance\\rightskip by 0pt plus 2cm\n \\parfillskip -\\rightskip \\pretolerance=10000\n \\parindent #2\\relax\\@afterindenttrue\n \\interlinepenalty\\@M\n \\leavevmode\n \\@tempdima #3\\relax\n \\advance\\leftskip \\@tempdima \\null\\nobreak\\hskip -\\leftskip\n {#4}\\nobreak\n \\leaders\\hbox{$\\m@th\n \\mkern \\@dotsep mu\\hbox{.}\\mkern \\@dotsep\n mu$}\\hfill\n \\nobreak\n \\hb@xt@\\@pnumwidth{\\hfil\\normalfont \\normalcolor #5}%\n \\par}%\n \\fi}\n%\n\\def\\switcht@albion{%\n\\def\\abstractname{Abstract.}\n\\def\\ackname{Acknowledgement.}\n\\def\\andname{and}\n\\def\\lastandname{\\unskip, and}\n\\def\\appendixname{Appendix}\n\\def\\chaptername{Chapter}\n\\def\\claimname{Claim}\n\\def\\conjecturename{Conjecture}\n\\def\\contentsname{Table of Contents}\n\\def\\corollaryname{Corollary}\n\\def\\definitionname{Definition}\n\\def\\examplename{Example}\n\\def\\exercisename{Exercise}\n\\def\\figurename{Fig.}\n\\def\\keywordname{{\\bf Keywords:}}\n\\def\\indexname{Index}\n\\def\\lemmaname{Lemma}\n\\def\\contriblistname{List of Contributors}\n\\def\\listfigurename{List of Figures}\n\\def\\listtablename{List of Tables}\n\\def\\mailname{{\\it Correspondence to\\/}:}\n\\def\\noteaddname{Note added in proof}\n\\def\\notename{Note}\n\\def\\partname{Part}\n\\def\\problemname{Problem}\n\\def\\proofname{Proof}\n\\def\\propertyname{Property}\n\\def\\propositionname{Proposition}\n\\def\\questionname{Question}\n\\def\\remarkname{Remark}\n\\def\\seename{see}\n\\def\\solutionname{Solution}\n\\def\\subclassname{{\\it Subject Classifications\\/}:}\n\\def\\tablename{Table}\n\\def\\theoremname{Theorem}}\n\\switcht@albion\n% Names of theorem like environments are already defined\n% but must be translated if another language is chosen\n%\n% French section\n\\def\\switcht@francais{%\\typeout{On parle francais.}%\n \\def\\abstractname{R\\'esum\\'e.}%\n \\def\\ackname{Remerciements.}%\n \\def\\andname{et}%\n \\def\\lastandname{ et}%\n \\def\\appendixname{Appendice}%\n \\def\\chaptername{Chapitre}%\n \\def\\claimname{Pr\\'etention}%\n \\def\\conjecturename{Hypoth\\`ese}%\n \\def\\contentsname{Table des mati\\`eres}%\n \\def\\corollaryname{Corollaire}%\n \\def\\definitionname{D\\'efinition}%\n \\def\\examplename{Exemple}%\n \\def\\exercisename{Exercice}%\n \\def\\figurename{Fig.}%\n \\def\\keywordname{{\\bf Mots-cl\\'e:}}%\n \\def\\indexname{Index}%\n \\def\\lemmaname{Lemme}%\n \\def\\contriblistname{Liste des contributeurs}%\n \\def\\listfigurename{Liste des figures}%\n \\def\\listtablename{Liste des tables}%\n \\def\\mailname{{\\it Correspondence to\\/}:}%\n \\def\\noteaddname{Note ajout\\'ee \\`a l'\\'epreuve}%\n \\def\\notename{Remarque}%\n \\def\\partname{Partie}%\n \\def\\problemname{Probl\\`eme}%\n \\def\\proofname{Preuve}%\n \\def\\propertyname{Caract\\'eristique}%\n%\\def\\propositionname{Proposition}%\n \\def\\questionname{Question}%\n \\def\\remarkname{Remarque}%\n \\def\\seename{voir}%\n \\def\\solutionname{Solution}%\n \\def\\subclassname{{\\it Subject Classifications\\/}:}%\n \\def\\tablename{Tableau}%\n \\def\\theoremname{Th\\'eor\\`eme}%\n}\n%\n% German section\n\\def\\switcht@deutsch{%\\typeout{Man spricht deutsch.}%\n \\def\\abstractname{Zusammenfassung.}%\n \\def\\ackname{Danksagung.}%\n \\def\\andname{und}%\n \\def\\lastandname{ und}%\n \\def\\appendixname{Anhang}%\n \\def\\chaptername{Kapitel}%\n \\def\\claimname{Behauptung}%\n \\def\\conjecturename{Hypothese}%\n \\def\\contentsname{Inhaltsverzeichnis}%\n \\def\\corollaryname{Korollar}%\n%\\def\\definitionname{Definition}%\n \\def\\examplename{Beispiel}%\n \\def\\exercisename{\\\"Ubung}%\n \\def\\figurename{Abb.}%\n \\def\\keywordname{{\\bf Schl\\\"usselw\\\"orter:}}%\n \\def\\indexname{Index}%\n%\\def\\lemmaname{Lemma}%\n \\def\\contriblistname{Mitarbeiter}%\n \\def\\listfigurename{Abbildungsverzeichnis}%\n \\def\\listtablename{Tabellenverzeichnis}%\n \\def\\mailname{{\\it Correspondence to\\/}:}%\n \\def\\noteaddname{Nachtrag}%\n \\def\\notename{Anmerkung}%\n \\def\\partname{Teil}%\n%\\def\\problemname{Problem}%\n \\def\\proofname{Beweis}%\n \\def\\propertyname{Eigenschaft}%\n%\\def\\propositionname{Proposition}%\n \\def\\questionname{Frage}%\n \\def\\remarkname{Anmerkung}%\n \\def\\seename{siehe}%\n \\def\\solutionname{L\\\"osung}%\n \\def\\subclassname{{\\it Subject Classifications\\/}:}%\n \\def\\tablename{Tabelle}%\n%\\def\\theoremname{Theorem}%\n}\n\n% Ragged bottom for the actual page\n\\def\\thisbottomragged{\\def\\@textbottom{\\vskip\\z@ plus.0001fil\n\\global\\let\\@textbottom\\relax}}\n\n\\renewcommand\\small{%\n \\@setfontsize\\small\\@ixpt{11}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 8.5\\p@ \\@plus3\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus2\\p@\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 4\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus2\\p@\n \\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\parsep 0\\p@ \\@plus1\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\topsep 8\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\itemsep0\\p@}%\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n}\n\n\\frenchspacing\n\\widowpenalty=10000\n\\clubpenalty=10000\n\n\\setlength\\oddsidemargin {63\\p@}\n\\setlength\\evensidemargin {63\\p@}\n\\setlength\\marginparwidth {90\\p@}\n\n\\setlength\\headsep {16\\p@}\n\n\\setlength\\footnotesep{7.7\\p@}\n\\setlength\\textfloatsep{8mm\\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}\n\\setlength\\intextsep {8mm\\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\n\\setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}\n\n\\newcounter {chapter}\n\\renewcommand\\thechapter {\\@arabic\\c@chapter}\n\n\\newif\\if@mainmatter \\@mainmattertrue\n\\newcommand\\frontmatter{\\cleardoublepage\n \\@mainmatterfalse\\pagenumbering{Roman}}\n\\newcommand\\mainmatter{\\cleardoublepage\n \\@mainmattertrue\\pagenumbering{arabic}}\n\\newcommand\\backmatter{\\if@openright\\cleardoublepage\\else\\clearpage\\fi\n \\@mainmatterfalse}\n\n\\renewcommand\\part{\\cleardoublepage\n \\thispagestyle{empty}%\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\onecolumn\n \\@tempswatrue\n \\else\n \\@tempswafalse\n \\fi\n \\null\\vfil\n \\secdef\\@part\\@spart}\n\n\\def\\@part[#1]#2{%\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >-2\\relax\n \\refstepcounter{part}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{part}{\\thepart\\hspace{1em}#1}%\n \\else\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{part}{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\markboth{}{}%\n {\\centering\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M\n \\normalfont\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >-2\\relax\n \\huge\\bfseries \\partname~\\thepart\n \\par\n \\vskip 20\\p@\n \\fi\n \\Huge \\bfseries #2\\par}%\n \\@endpart}\n\\def\\@spart#1{%\n {\\centering\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M\n \\normalfont\n \\Huge \\bfseries #1\\par}%\n \\@endpart}\n\\def\\@endpart{\\vfil\\newpage\n \\if@twoside\n \\null\n \\thispagestyle{empty}%\n \\newpage\n \\fi\n \\if@tempswa\n \\twocolumn\n \\fi}\n\n\\newcommand\\chapter{\\clearpage\n \\thispagestyle{empty}%\n \\global\\@topnum\\z@\n \\@afterindentfalse\n \\secdef\\@chapter\\@schapter}\n\\def\\@chapter[#1]#2{\\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\m@ne\n \\if@mainmatter\n \\refstepcounter{chapter}%\n \\typeout{\\@chapapp\\space\\thechapter.}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}%\n {\\protect\\numberline{\\thechapter}#1}%\n \\else\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\chaptermark{#1}%\n \\addtocontents{lof}{\\protect\\addvspace{10\\p@}}%\n \\addtocontents{lot}{\\protect\\addvspace{10\\p@}}%\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@topnewpage[\\@makechapterhead{#2}]%\n \\else\n \\@makechapterhead{#2}%\n \\@afterheading\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@makechapterhead#1{%\n% \\vspace*{50\\p@}%\n {\\centering\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\m@ne\n \\if@mainmatter\n \\large\\bfseries \\@chapapp{} \\thechapter\n \\par\\nobreak\n \\vskip 20\\p@\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\interlinepenalty\\@M\n \\Large \\bfseries #1\\par\\nobreak\n \\vskip 40\\p@\n }}\n\\def\\@schapter#1{\\if@twocolumn\n \\@topnewpage[\\@makeschapterhead{#1}]%\n \\else\n \\@makeschapterhead{#1}%\n \\@afterheading\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@makeschapterhead#1{%\n% \\vspace*{50\\p@}%\n {\\centering\n \\normalfont\n \\interlinepenalty\\@M\n \\Large \\bfseries #1\\par\\nobreak\n \\vskip 40\\p@\n }}\n\n\\renewcommand\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}%\n {-18\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {12\\p@ \\@plus 4\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}%\n {\\normalfont\\large\\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\rightskip=\\z@ \\@plus 8em\\pretolerance=10000 }}\n\\renewcommand\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}%\n {-18\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {8\\p@ \\@plus 4\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\rightskip=\\z@ \\@plus 8em\\pretolerance=10000 }}\n\\renewcommand\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}%\n {-18\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {-0.5em \\@plus -0.22em \\@minus -0.1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries\\boldmath}}\n\\renewcommand\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}%\n {-12\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {-0.5em \\@plus -0.22em \\@minus -0.1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}\n\\renewcommand\\subparagraph[1]{\\typeout{LLNCS warning: You should not use\n \\string\\subparagraph\\space with this class}\\vskip0.5cm\nYou should not use \\verb|\\subparagraph| with this class.\\vskip0.5cm}\n\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Gamma}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"00}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Delta}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"01}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Theta}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"02}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Lambda}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"03}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Xi}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"04}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Pi}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"05}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Sigma}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"06}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Upsilon}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"07}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Phi}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"08}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Psi}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"09}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Omega}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"0A}\n\n\\let\\footnotesize\\small\n\n\\if@custvec\n\\DeclareRobustCommand\\vec[1]{\\mathchoice{\\mbox{\\boldmath$\\displaystyle#1$}}\n{\\mbox{\\boldmath$\\textstyle#1$}}\n{\\mbox{\\boldmath$\\scriptstyle#1$}}\n{\\mbox{\\boldmath$\\scriptscriptstyle#1$}}}\n\\fi\n\n\\def\\squareforqed{\\hbox{\\rlap{$\\sqcap$}$\\sqcup$}}\n\\def\\qed{\\ifmmode\\squareforqed\\else{\\unskip\\nobreak\\hfil\n\\penalty50\\hskip1em\\null\\nobreak\\hfil\\squareforqed\n\\parfillskip=0pt\\finalhyphendemerits=0\\endgraf}\\fi}\n\n\\def\\getsto{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\n\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\gets\\cr\\to\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\gets\n\\cr\\to\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\gets\n\\cr\\to\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n\\gets\\cr\\to\\cr}}}}}\n\\def\\lid{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n<\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip0.9pt}=\\cr}}}}}\n\\def\\gid{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip0.9pt}=\\cr}}}}}\n\\def\\grole{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\n\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-1pt}<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-1pt}<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-0.8pt}<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-0.3pt}<\\cr}}}}}\n\\def\\bbbr{{\\rm I\\!R}} %reelle Zahlen\n\\def\\bbbm{{\\rm I\\!M}}\n\\def\\bbbn{{\\rm I\\!N}} %natuerliche Zahlen\n\\def\\bbbf{{\\rm I\\!F}}\n\\def\\bbbh{{\\rm I\\!H}}\n\\def\\bbbk{{\\rm I\\!K}}\n\\def\\bbbp{{\\rm I\\!P}}\n\\def\\bbbone{{\\mathchoice {\\rm 1\\mskip-4mu l} {\\rm 1\\mskip-4mu l}\n{\\rm 1\\mskip-4.5mu l} {\\rm 1\\mskip-5mu l}}}\n\\def\\bbbc{{\\mathchoice {\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\rm C$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\textstyle\\rm C$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle\\rm C$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\rm C$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}}}\n\\def\\bbbq{{\\mathchoice {\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\rm\nQ$}\\hbox{\\raise\n0.15\\ht0\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.8\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\textstyle\\rm Q$}\\hbox{\\raise\n0.15\\ht0\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.8\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle\\rm Q$}\\hbox{\\raise\n0.15\\ht0\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.7\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\rm Q$}\\hbox{\\raise\n0.15\\ht0\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.7\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}}}\n\\def\\bbbt{{\\mathchoice {\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\rm\nT$}\\hbox{\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.3\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\textstyle\\rm T$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.3\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle\\rm T$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.3\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\rm T$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.3\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}}}\n\\def\\bbbs{{\\mathchoice\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle \\rm S$}\\hbox{\\raise0.5\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.35\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.55\\wd0\\vrule height0.5\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\textstyle \\rm S$}\\hbox{\\raise0.5\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.35\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.55\\wd0\\vrule height0.5\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle \\rm S$}\\hbox{\\raise0.5\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.35\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\raise0.05\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.5\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\rm S$}\\hbox{\\raise0.5\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\raise0.05\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.55\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}}}\n\\def\\bbbz{{\\mathchoice {\\hbox{$\\mathsf\\textstyle Z\\kern-0.4em Z$}}\n{\\hbox{$\\mathsf\\textstyle Z\\kern-0.4em Z$}}\n{\\hbox{$\\mathsf\\scriptstyle Z\\kern-0.3em Z$}}\n{\\hbox{$\\mathsf\\scriptscriptstyle Z\\kern-0.2em Z$}}}}\n\n\\let\\ts\\,\n\n\\setlength\\leftmargini {17\\p@}\n\\setlength\\leftmargin {\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginii {\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiii {\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiv {\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength \\labelsep {.5em}\n\\setlength \\labelwidth{\\leftmargini}\n\\addtolength\\labelwidth{-\\labelsep}\n\n\\def\\@listI{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\parsep 0\\p@ \\@plus1\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\topsep 8\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\itemsep0\\p@}\n\\let\\@listi\\@listI\n\\@listi\n\\def\\@listii {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 0\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus\\p@}\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 0\\p@ \\@plus\\p@\\@minus\\p@\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\partopsep \\p@ \\@plus\\z@ \\@minus\\p@}\n\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemi{\\normalfont\\bfseries --}\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemii{$\\m@th\\bullet$}\n\n\\setlength\\arraycolsep{1.4\\p@}\n\\setlength\\tabcolsep{1.4\\p@}\n\n\\def\\tableofcontents{\\chapter*{\\contentsname\\@mkboth{{\\contentsname}}%\n {{\\contentsname}}}\n \\def\\authcount##1{\\setcounter{auco}{##1}\\setcounter{@auth}{1}}\n \\def\\lastand{\\ifnum\\value{auco}=2\\relax\n \\unskip{} \\andname\\\n \\else\n \\unskip \\lastandname\\\n \\fi}%\n \\def\\and{\\stepcounter{@auth}\\relax\n \\ifnum\\value{@auth}=\\value{auco}%\n \\lastand\n \\else\n \\unskip,\n \\fi}%\n \\@starttoc{toc}\\if@restonecol\\twocolumn\\fi}\n\n\\def\\l@part#1#2{\\addpenalty{\\@secpenalty}%\n \\addvspace{2em plus\\p@}% % space above part line\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@\n \\rightskip \\z@ plus 5em\n \\hrule\\vskip5pt\n \\large % same size as for a contribution heading\n \\bfseries\\boldmath % set line in boldface\n \\leavevmode % TeX command to enter horizontal mode.\n #1\\par\n \\vskip5pt\n \\hrule\n \\vskip1pt\n \\nobreak % Never break after part entry\n \\endgroup}\n\n\\def\\@dotsep{2}\n\n\\let\\phantomsection=\\relax\n\n\\def\\hyperhrefextend{\\ifx\\hyper@anchor\\@undefined\\else\n{}\\fi}\n\n\\def\\addnumcontentsmark#1#2#3{%\n\\addtocontents{#1}{\\protect\\contentsline{#2}{\\protect\\numberline\n {\\thechapter}#3}{\\thepage}\\hyperhrefextend}}%\n\\def\\addcontentsmark#1#2#3{%\n\\addtocontents{#1}{\\protect\\contentsline{#2}{#3}{\\thepage}\\hyperhrefextend}}%\n\\def\\addcontentsmarkwop#1#2#3{%\n\\addtocontents{#1}{\\protect\\contentsline{#2}{#3}{0}\\hyperhrefextend}}%\n\n\\def\\@adcmk[#1]{\\ifcase #1 \\or\n\\def\\@gtempa{\\addnumcontentsmark}%\n \\or \\def\\@gtempa{\\addcontentsmark}%\n \\or \\def\\@gtempa{\\addcontentsmarkwop}%\n \\fi\\@gtempa{toc}{chapter}%\n}\n\\def\\addtocmark{%\n\\phantomsection\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@adcmk}{\\@adcmk[3]}%\n}\n\n\\def\\l@chapter#1#2{\\addpenalty{-\\@highpenalty}\n \\vskip 1.0em plus 1pt \\@tempdima 1.5em \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@ \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg\n \\advance\\rightskip by 0pt plus 2cm\n \\parfillskip -\\rightskip \\pretolerance=10000\n \\leavevmode \\advance\\leftskip\\@tempdima \\hskip -\\leftskip\n {\\large\\bfseries\\boldmath#1}\\ifx0#2\\hfil\\null\n \\else\n \\nobreak\n \\leaders\\hbox{$\\m@th \\mkern \\@dotsep mu.\\mkern\n \\@dotsep mu$}\\hfill\n \\nobreak\\hbox to\\@pnumwidth{\\hss #2}%\n \\fi\\par\n \\penalty\\@highpenalty \\endgroup}\n\n\\def\\l@title#1#2{\\addpenalty{-\\@highpenalty}\n \\addvspace{8pt plus 1pt}\n \\@tempdima \\z@\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@ \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg\n \\advance\\rightskip by 0pt plus 2cm\n \\parfillskip -\\rightskip \\pretolerance=10000\n \\leavevmode \\advance\\leftskip\\@tempdima \\hskip -\\leftskip\n #1\\nobreak\n \\leaders\\hbox{$\\m@th \\mkern \\@dotsep mu.\\mkern\n \\@dotsep mu$}\\hfill\n \\nobreak\\hbox to\\@pnumwidth{\\hss #2}\\par\n \\penalty\\@highpenalty \\endgroup}\n\n\\def\\l@author#1#2{\\addpenalty{\\@highpenalty}\n \\@tempdima=15\\p@ %\\z@\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@ \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg\n \\advance\\rightskip by 0pt plus 2cm\n \\pretolerance=10000\n \\leavevmode \\advance\\leftskip\\@tempdima %\\hskip -\\leftskip\n \\textit{#1}\\par\n \\penalty\\@highpenalty \\endgroup}\n\n\\setcounter{tocdepth}{0}\n\\newdimen\\tocchpnum\n\\newdimen\\tocsecnum\n\\newdimen\\tocsectotal\n\\newdimen\\tocsubsecnum\n\\newdimen\\tocsubsectotal\n\\newdimen\\tocsubsubsecnum\n\\newdimen\\tocsubsubsectotal\n\\newdimen\\tocparanum\n\\newdimen\\tocparatotal\n\\newdimen\\tocsubparanum\n\\tocchpnum=\\z@ % no chapter numbers\n\\tocsecnum=15\\p@ % section 88. plus 2.222pt\n\\tocsubsecnum=23\\p@ % subsection 88.8 plus 2.222pt\n\\tocsubsubsecnum=27\\p@ % subsubsection 88.8.8 plus 1.444pt\n\\tocparanum=35\\p@ % paragraph 88.8.8.8 plus 1.666pt\n\\tocsubparanum=43\\p@ % subparagraph 88.8.8.8.8 plus 1.888pt\n\\def\\calctocindent{%\n\\tocsectotal=\\tocchpnum\n\\advance\\tocsectotal by\\tocsecnum\n\\tocsubsectotal=\\tocsectotal\n\\advance\\tocsubsectotal by\\tocsubsecnum\n\\tocsubsubsectotal=\\tocsubsectotal\n\\advance\\tocsubsubsectotal by\\tocsubsubsecnum\n\\tocparatotal=\\tocsubsubsectotal\n\\advance\\tocparatotal by\\tocparanum}\n\\calctocindent\n\n\\def\\l@section{\\@dottedtocline{1}{\\tocchpnum}{\\tocsecnum}}\n\\def\\l@subsection{\\@dottedtocline{2}{\\tocsectotal}{\\tocsubsecnum}}\n\\def\\l@subsubsection{\\@dottedtocline{3}{\\tocsubsectotal}{\\tocsubsubsecnum}}\n\\def\\l@paragraph{\\@dottedtocline{4}{\\tocsubsubsectotal}{\\tocparanum}}\n\\def\\l@subparagraph{\\@dottedtocline{5}{\\tocparatotal}{\\tocsubparanum}}\n\n\\def\\listoffigures{\\@restonecolfalse\\if@twocolumn\\@restonecoltrue\\onecolumn\n \\fi\\section*{\\listfigurename\\@mkboth{{\\listfigurename}}{{\\listfigurename}}}\n \\@starttoc{lof}\\if@restonecol\\twocolumn\\fi}\n\\def\\l@figure{\\@dottedtocline{1}{0em}{1.5em}}\n\n\\def\\listoftables{\\@restonecolfalse\\if@twocolumn\\@restonecoltrue\\onecolumn\n \\fi\\section*{\\listtablename\\@mkboth{{\\listtablename}}{{\\listtablename}}}\n \\@starttoc{lot}\\if@restonecol\\twocolumn\\fi}\n\\let\\l@table\\l@figure\n\n\\renewcommand\\listoffigures{%\n \\section*{\\listfigurename\n \\@mkboth{\\listfigurename}{\\listfigurename}}%\n \\@starttoc{lof}%\n }\n\n\\renewcommand\\listoftables{%\n \\section*{\\listtablename\n \\@mkboth{\\listtablename}{\\listtablename}}%\n \\@starttoc{lot}%\n }\n\n\\ifx\\oribibl\\undefined\n\\ifx\\citeauthoryear\\undefined\n\\renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]\n {\\section*{\\refname}\n \\def\\@biblabel##1{##1.}\n \\small\n \\list{\\@biblabel{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n {\\settowidth\\labelwidth{\\@biblabel{#1}}%\n \\leftmargin\\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\labelsep\n \\if@openbib\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\bibindent\n \\itemindent -\\bibindent\n \\listparindent \\itemindent\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\fi\n \\usecounter{enumiv}%\n \\let\\p@enumiv\\@empty\n \\renewcommand\\theenumiv{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n \\if@openbib\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\par}%\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\hskip .11em \\@plus.33em \\@minus.07em}%\n \\fi\n \\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000%\n \\sfcode`\\.=\\@m}\n {\\def\\@noitemerr\n {\\@latex@warning{Empty `thebibliography' environment}}%\n \\endlist}\n\\def\\@lbibitem[#1]#2{\\item[{[#1]}\\hfill]\\if@filesw\n {\\let\\protect\\noexpand\\immediate\n \\write\\@auxout{\\string\\bibcite{#2}{#1}}}\\fi\\ignorespaces}\n\\newcount\\@tempcntc\n\\def\\@citex[#1]#2{\\if@filesw\\immediate\\write\\@auxout{\\string\\citation{#2}}\\fi\n \\@tempcnta\\z@\\@tempcntb\\m@ne\\def\\@citea{}\\@cite{\\@for\\@citeb:=#2\\do\n {\\@ifundefined\n {b@\\@citeb}{\\@citeo\\@tempcntb\\m@ne\\@citea\\def\\@citea{,}{\\bfseries\n ?}\\@warning\n {Citation `\\@citeb' on page \\thepage \\space undefined}}%\n {\\setbox\\z@\\hbox{\\global\\@tempcntc0\\csname b@\\@citeb\\endcsname\\relax}%\n \\ifnum\\@tempcntc=\\z@ \\@citeo\\@tempcntb\\m@ne\n \\@citea\\def\\@citea{,}\\hbox{\\csname b@\\@citeb\\endcsname}%\n \\else\n \\advance\\@tempcntb\\@ne\n \\ifnum\\@tempcntb=\\@tempcntc\n \\else\\advance\\@tempcntb\\m@ne\\@citeo\n \\@tempcnta\\@tempcntc\\@tempcntb\\@tempcntc\\fi\\fi}}\\@citeo}{#1}}\n\\def\\@citeo{\\ifnum\\@tempcnta>\\@tempcntb\\else\n \\@citea\\def\\@citea{,\\,\\hskip\\z@skip}%\n \\ifnum\\@tempcnta=\\@tempcntb\\the\\@tempcnta\\else\n {\\advance\\@tempcnta\\@ne\\ifnum\\@tempcnta=\\@tempcntb \\else\n \\def\\@citea{--}\\fi\n \\advance\\@tempcnta\\m@ne\\the\\@tempcnta\\@citea\\the\\@tempcntb}\\fi\\fi}\n\\else\n\\renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]\n {\\section*{\\refname}\n \\small\n \\list{}%\n {\\settowidth\\labelwidth{}%\n \\leftmargin\\parindent\n \\itemindent=-\\parindent\n \\labelsep=\\z@\n \\if@openbib\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\bibindent\n \\itemindent -\\bibindent\n \\listparindent \\itemindent\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\fi\n \\usecounter{enumiv}%\n \\let\\p@enumiv\\@empty\n \\renewcommand\\theenumiv{}}%\n \\if@openbib\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\par}%\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\hskip .11em \\@plus.33em \\@minus.07em}%\n \\fi\n \\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000%\n \\sfcode`\\.=\\@m}\n {\\def\\@noitemerr\n {\\@latex@warning{Empty `thebibliography' environment}}%\n \\endlist}\n \\def\\@cite#1{#1}%\n \\def\\@lbibitem[#1]#2{\\item[]\\if@filesw\n {\\def\\protect##1{\\string ##1\\space}\\immediate\n \\write\\@auxout{\\string\\bibcite{#2}{#1}}}\\fi\\ignorespaces}\n \\fi\n\\else\n\\@cons\\@openbib@code{\\noexpand\\small}\n\\fi\n\n\\def\\idxquad{\\hskip 10\\p@}% space that divides entry from number\n\n\\def\\@idxitem{\\par\\hangindent 10\\p@}\n\n\\def\\subitem{\\par\\setbox0=\\hbox{--\\enspace}% second order\n \\noindent\\hangindent\\wd0\\box0}% index entry\n\n\\def\\subsubitem{\\par\\setbox0=\\hbox{--\\,--\\enspace}% third\n \\noindent\\hangindent\\wd0\\box0}% order index entry\n\n\\def\\indexspace{\\par \\vskip 10\\p@ plus5\\p@ minus3\\p@\\relax}\n\n\\renewenvironment{theindex}\n {\\@mkboth{\\indexname}{\\indexname}%\n \\thispagestyle{empty}\\parindent\\z@\n \\parskip\\z@ \\@plus .3\\p@\\relax\n \\let\\item\\par\n \\def\\,{\\relax\\ifmmode\\mskip\\thinmuskip\n \\else\\hskip0.2em\\ignorespaces\\fi}%\n \\normalfont\\small\n \\begin{multicols}{2}[\\@makeschapterhead{\\indexname}]%\n }\n {\\end{multicols}}\n\n\\renewcommand\\footnoterule{%\n \\kern-3\\p@\n \\hrule\\@width 2truecm\n \\kern2.6\\p@}\n \\newdimen\\fnindent\n \\fnindent1em\n\\long\\def\\@makefntext#1{%\n \\parindent \\fnindent%\n \\leftskip \\fnindent%\n \\noindent\n \\llap{\\hb@xt@1em{\\hss\\@makefnmark\\ }}\\ignorespaces#1}\n\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{%\n \\small\n \\vskip\\abovecaptionskip\n \\sbox\\@tempboxa{{\\bfseries #1.} #2}%\n \\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize\n {\\bfseries #1.} #2\\par\n \\else\n \\global \\@minipagefalse\n \\hb@xt@\\hsize{\\hfil\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n \\fi\n \\vskip\\belowcaptionskip}\n\n\\def\\fps@figure{htbp}\n\\def\\fnum@figure{\\figurename\\thinspace\\thefigure}\n\\def \\@floatboxreset {%\n \\reset@font\n \\small\n \\@setnobreak\n \\@setminipage\n}\n\\def\\fps@table{htbp}\n\\def\\fnum@table{\\tablename~\\thetable}\n\\renewenvironment{table}\n {\\setlength\\abovecaptionskip{0\\p@}%\n \\setlength\\belowcaptionskip{10\\p@}%\n \\@float{table}}\n {\\end@float}\n\\renewenvironment{table*}\n {\\setlength\\abovecaptionskip{0\\p@}%\n \\setlength\\belowcaptionskip{10\\p@}%\n \\@dblfloat{table}}\n {\\end@dblfloat}\n\n\\long\\def\\@caption#1[#2]#3{\\par\\addcontentsline{\\csname\n ext@#1\\endcsname}{#1}{\\protect\\numberline{\\csname\n the#1\\endcsname}{\\ignorespaces #2}}\\begingroup\n \\@parboxrestore\n \\@makecaption{\\csname fnum@#1\\endcsname}{\\ignorespaces #3}\\par\n \\endgroup}\n\n% LaTeX does not provide a command to enter the authors institute\n% addresses. The \\institute command is defined here.\n\n\\newcounter{@inst}\n\\newcounter{@auth}\n\\newcounter{auco}\n\\newdimen\\instindent\n\\newbox\\authrun\n\\newtoks\\authorrunning\n\\newtoks\\tocauthor\n\\newbox\\titrun\n\\newtoks\\titlerunning\n\\newtoks\\toctitle\n\n\\def\\clearheadinfo{\\gdef\\@author{No Author Given}%\n \\gdef\\@title{No Title Given}%\n \\gdef\\@subtitle{}%\n \\gdef\\@institute{No Institute Given}%\n \\gdef\\@thanks{}%\n \\global\\titlerunning={}\\global\\authorrunning={}%\n \\global\\toctitle={}\\global\\tocauthor={}}\n\n\\def\\institute#1{\\gdef\\@institute{#1}}\n\n\\def\\institutename{\\par\n \\begingroup\n \\parskip=\\z@\n \\parindent=\\z@\n \\setcounter{@inst}{1}%\n \\def\\and{\\par\\stepcounter{@inst}%\n \\noindent$^{\\the@inst}$\\enspace\\ignorespaces}%\n \\setbox0=\\vbox{\\def\\thanks##1{}\\@institute}%\n \\ifnum\\c@@inst=1\\relax\n \\gdef\\fnnstart{0}%\n \\else\n \\xdef\\fnnstart{\\c@@inst}%\n \\setcounter{@inst}{1}%\n \\noindent$^{\\the@inst}$\\enspace\n \\fi\n \\ignorespaces\n \\@institute\\par\n \\endgroup}\n\n\\def\\@fnsymbol#1{\\ensuremath{\\ifcase#1\\or\\star\\or{\\star\\star}\\or\n {\\star\\star\\star}\\or \\dagger\\or \\ddagger\\or\n \\mathchar \"278\\or \\mathchar \"27B\\or \\|\\or **\\or \\dagger\\dagger\n \\or \\ddagger\\ddagger \\else\\@ctrerr\\fi}}\n\n\\def\\inst#1{\\unskip$^{#1}$}\n\\def\\orcidID#1{\\unskip$^{[#1]}$} % added MR 2018-03-10\n\\def\\fnmsep{\\unskip$^,$}\n\\def\\email#1{{\\tt#1}}\n\n\\AtBeginDocument{\\@ifundefined{url}{\\def\\url#1{#1}}{}%\n\\@ifpackageloaded{babel}{%\n\\@ifundefined{extrasenglish}{}{\\addto\\extrasenglish{\\switcht@albion}}%\n\\@ifundefined{extrasfrenchb}{}{\\addto\\extrasfrenchb{\\switcht@francais}}%\n\\@ifundefined{extrasgerman}{}{\\addto\\extrasgerman{\\switcht@deutsch}}%\n\\@ifundefined{extrasngerman}{}{\\addto\\extrasngerman{\\switcht@deutsch}}%\n}{\\switcht@@therlang}%\n\\providecommand{\\keywords}[1]{\\def\\and{{\\textperiodcentered} }%\n\\par\\addvspace\\baselineskip\n\\noindent\\keywordname\\enspace\\ignorespaces#1}%\n\\@ifpackageloaded{hyperref}{%\n\\def\\doi#1{\\href{https://doi.org/\\detokenize{#1}}{\\url{https://doi.org/#1}}}}{\n\\def\\doi#1{https://doi.org/\\detokenize{#1}}}\n}\n\\def\\homedir{\\~{ }}\n\n\\def\\subtitle#1{\\gdef\\@subtitle{#1}}\n\\clearheadinfo\n%\n%%% to avoid hyperref warnings\n\\providecommand*{\\toclevel@author}{999}\n%%% to make title-entry parent of section-entries\n\\providecommand*{\\toclevel@title}{0}\n%\n\\renewcommand\\maketitle{\\newpage\n\\phantomsection\n \\refstepcounter{chapter}%\n \\stepcounter{section}%\n \\setcounter{section}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{figure}{0}\n \\setcounter{table}{0}\n \\setcounter{equation}{0}\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}%\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent=\\z@\n \\renewcommand\\thefootnote{\\@fnsymbol\\c@footnote}%\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\ifnum \\col@number=\\@ne\n \\@maketitle\n \\else\n \\twocolumn[\\@maketitle]%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\newpage\n \\global\\@topnum\\z@ % Prevents figures from going at top of page.\n \\@maketitle\n \\fi\n \\thispagestyle{empty}\\@thanks\n%\n \\def\\\\{\\unskip\\ \\ignorespaces}\\def\\inst##1{\\unskip{}}%\n \\def\\thanks##1{\\unskip{}}\\def\\fnmsep{\\unskip}%\n \\instindent=\\hsize\n \\advance\\instindent by-\\headlineindent\n \\if!\\the\\toctitle!\\addcontentsline{toc}{title}{\\@title}\\else\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{title}{\\the\\toctitle}\\fi\n \\if@runhead\n \\if!\\the\\titlerunning!\\else\n \\edef\\@title{\\the\\titlerunning}%\n \\fi\n \\global\\setbox\\titrun=\\hbox{\\small\\rm\\unboldmath\\ignorespaces\\@title}%\n \\ifdim\\wd\\titrun>\\instindent\n \\typeout{Title too long for running head. Please supply}%\n \\typeout{a shorter form with \\string\\titlerunning\\space prior to\n \\string\\maketitle}%\n \\global\\setbox\\titrun=\\hbox{\\small\\rm\n Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length}%\n \\fi\n \\xdef\\@title{\\copy\\titrun}%\n \\fi\n%\n \\if!\\the\\tocauthor!\\relax\n {\\def\\and{\\noexpand\\protect\\noexpand\\and}%\n \\def\\inst##1{}% added MR 2017-09-20 to remove inst numbers from the TOC\n \\def\\orcidID##1{}% added MR 2017-09-20 to remove ORCID ids from the TOC\n \\protected@xdef\\toc@uthor{\\@author}}%\n \\else\n \\def\\\\{\\noexpand\\protect\\noexpand\\newline}%\n \\protected@xdef\\scratch{\\the\\tocauthor}%\n \\protected@xdef\\toc@uthor{\\scratch}%\n \\fi\n \\addtocontents{toc}{\\noexpand\\protect\\noexpand\\authcount{\\the\\c@auco}}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{author}{\\toc@uthor}%\n \\if@runhead\n \\if!\\the\\authorrunning!\n \\value{@inst}=\\value{@auth}%\n \\setcounter{@auth}{1}%\n \\else\n \\edef\\@author{\\the\\authorrunning}%\n \\fi\n \\global\\setbox\\authrun=\\hbox{\\def\\inst##1{}% added MR 2017-09-20 to remove inst numbers from the runninghead\n \\def\\orcidID##1{}% added MR 2017-09-20 to remove ORCID ids from the runninghead\n \\small\\unboldmath\\@author\\unskip}%\n \\ifdim\\wd\\authrun>\\instindent\n \\typeout{Names of authors too long for running head. Please supply}%\n \\typeout{a shorter form with \\string\\authorrunning\\space prior to\n \\string\\maketitle}%\n \\global\\setbox\\authrun=\\hbox{\\small\\rm\n Authors Suppressed Due to Excessive Length}%\n \\fi\n \\xdef\\@author{\\copy\\authrun}%\n \\markboth{\\@author}{\\@title}%\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\setcounter{footnote}{\\fnnstart}%\n \\clearheadinfo}\n%\n\\def\\@maketitle{\\newpage\n \\markboth{}{}%\n \\def\\lastand{\\ifnum\\value{@inst}=2\\relax\n \\unskip{} \\andname\\\n \\else\n \\unskip \\lastandname\\\n \\fi}%\n \\def\\and{\\stepcounter{@auth}\\relax\n \\ifnum\\value{@auth}=\\value{@inst}%\n \\lastand\n \\else\n \\unskip,\n \\fi}%\n \\begin{center}%\n \\let\\newline\\\\\n {\\Large \\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\pretolerance=10000\n \\@title \\par}\\vskip .8cm\n\\if!\\@subtitle!\\else {\\large \\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\vskip -.65cm\n \\pretolerance=10000\n \\@subtitle \\par}\\vskip .8cm\\fi\n \\setbox0=\\vbox{\\setcounter{@auth}{1}\\def\\and{\\stepcounter{@auth}}%\n \\def\\thanks##1{}\\@author}%\n \\global\\value{@inst}=\\value{@auth}%\n \\global\\value{auco}=\\value{@auth}%\n \\setcounter{@auth}{1}%\n{\\lineskip .5em\n\\noindent\\ignorespaces\n\\@author\\vskip.35cm}\n {\\small\\institutename}\n \\end{center}%\n }\n\n% definition of the \"\\spnewtheorem\" command.\n%\n% Usage:\n%\n% \\spnewtheorem{env_nam}{caption}[within]{cap_font}{body_font}\n% or \\spnewtheorem{env_nam}[numbered_like]{caption}{cap_font}{body_font}\n% or \\spnewtheorem*{env_nam}{caption}{cap_font}{body_font}\n%\n% New is \"cap_font\" and \"body_font\". It stands for\n% fontdefinition of the caption and the text itself.\n%\n% \"\\spnewtheorem*\" gives a theorem without number.\n%\n% A defined spnewthoerem environment is used as described\n% by Lamport.\n%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\def\\@thmcountersep{}\n\\def\\@thmcounterend{.}\n\n\\def\\spnewtheorem{\\@ifstar{\\@sthm}{\\@Sthm}}\n\n% definition of \\spnewtheorem with number\n\n\\def\\@spnthm#1#2{%\n \\@ifnextchar[{\\@spxnthm{#1}{#2}}{\\@spynthm{#1}{#2}}}\n\\def\\@Sthm#1{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@spothm{#1}}{\\@spnthm{#1}}}\n\n\\def\\@spxnthm#1#2[#3]#4#5{\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\@definecounter{#1}\\@addtoreset{#1}{#3}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname the#1\\endcsname{\\expandafter\\noexpand\n \\csname the#3\\endcsname \\noexpand\\@thmcountersep \\@thmcounter{#1}}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname #1name\\endcsname{#2}%\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@spthm{#1}{\\csname #1name\\endcsname}{#4}{#5}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}\n\n\\def\\@spynthm#1#2#3#4{\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\@definecounter{#1}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname the#1\\endcsname{\\@thmcounter{#1}}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname #1name\\endcsname{#2}%\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@spthm{#1}{\\csname #1name\\endcsname}{#3}{#4}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}\n\n\\def\\@spothm#1[#2]#3#4#5{%\n \\@ifundefined{c@#2}{\\@latexerr{No theorem environment `#2' defined}\\@eha}%\n {\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\newaliascnt{#1}{#2}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname #1name\\endcsname{#3}%\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@spthm{#1}{\\csname #1name\\endcsname}{#4}{#5}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}}\n\n\\def\\@spthm#1#2#3#4{\\topsep 7\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n\\refstepcounter{#1}%\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@spythm{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}}{\\@spxthm{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}}}\n\n\\def\\@spxthm#1#2#3#4{\\@spbegintheorem{#2}{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}{#3}{#4}%\n \\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\@spythm#1#2#3#4[#5]{\\@spopargbegintheorem{#2}{\\csname\n the#1\\endcsname}{#5}{#3}{#4}\\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\@spbegintheorem#1#2#3#4{\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{#3#1\\ #2\\@thmcounterend}]#4}\n\n\\def\\@spopargbegintheorem#1#2#3#4#5{\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{#4#1\\ #2}]{#4(#3)\\@thmcounterend\\ }#5}\n\n% definition of \\spnewtheorem* without number\n\n\\def\\@sthm#1#2{\\@Ynthm{#1}{#2}}\n\n\\def\\@Ynthm#1#2#3#4{\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@Thm{\\csname #1name\\endcsname}{#3}{#4}}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname #1name\\endcsname{#2}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}\n\n\\def\\@Thm#1#2#3{\\topsep 7\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@Ythm{#1}{#2}{#3}}{\\@Xthm{#1}{#2}{#3}}}\n\n\\def\\@Xthm#1#2#3{\\@Begintheorem{#1}{#2}{#3}\\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\@Ythm#1#2#3[#4]{\\@Opargbegintheorem{#1}\n {#4}{#2}{#3}\\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\@Begintheorem#1#2#3{#3\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{#2#1\\@thmcounterend}]}\n\n\\def\\@Opargbegintheorem#1#2#3#4{#4\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{#3#1}]{#3(#2)\\@thmcounterend\\ }}\n\n\\if@envcntsect\n \\def\\@thmcountersep{.}\n \\spnewtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\else\n \\spnewtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n \\if@envcntreset\n \\@addtoreset{theorem}{section}\n \\else\n \\@addtoreset{theorem}{chapter}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n%definition of divers theorem environments\n\\spnewtheorem*{claim}{Claim}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spnewtheorem*{proof}{Proof}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\if@envcntsame % alle Umgebungen wie Theorem.\n \\def\\spn@wtheorem#1#2#3#4{\\@spothm{#1}[theorem]{#2}{#3}{#4}}\n\\else % alle Umgebungen mit eigenem Zaehler\n \\if@envcntsect % mit section numeriert\n \\def\\spn@wtheorem#1#2#3#4{\\@spxnthm{#1}{#2}[section]{#3}{#4}}\n \\else % nicht mit section numeriert\n \\if@envcntreset\n \\def\\spn@wtheorem#1#2#3#4{\\@spynthm{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}\n \\@addtoreset{#1}{section}}\n \\else\n \\def\\spn@wtheorem#1#2#3#4{\\@spynthm{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}\n \\@addtoreset{#1}{chapter}}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\\spn@wtheorem{case}{Case}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{conjecture}{Conjecture}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{corollary}{Corollary}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\spn@wtheorem{definition}{Definition}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\spn@wtheorem{example}{Example}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{exercise}{Exercise}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\spn@wtheorem{note}{Note}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{problem}{Problem}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{property}{Property}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{proposition}{Proposition}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\spn@wtheorem{question}{Question}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{solution}{Solution}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{remark}{Remark}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\n\\def\\@takefromreset#1#2{%\n \\def\\@tempa{#1}%\n \\let\\@tempd\\@elt\n \\def\\@elt##1{%\n \\def\\@tempb{##1}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\\else\n \\@addtoreset{##1}{#2}%\n \\fi}%\n \\expandafter\\expandafter\\let\\expandafter\\@tempc\\csname cl@#2\\endcsname\n \\expandafter\\def\\csname cl@#2\\endcsname{}%\n \\@tempc\n \\let\\@elt\\@tempd}\n\n\\def\\theopargself{\\def\\@spopargbegintheorem##1##2##3##4##5{\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{##4##1\\ ##2}]{##4##3\\@thmcounterend\\ }##5}\n \\def\\@Opargbegintheorem##1##2##3##4{##4\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{##3##1}]{##3##2\\@thmcounterend\\ }}\n }\n\n\\renewenvironment{abstract}{%\n \\list{}{\\advance\\topsep by0.35cm\\relax\\small\n \\leftmargin=1cm\n \\labelwidth=\\z@\n \\listparindent=\\z@\n \\itemindent\\listparindent\n \\rightmargin\\leftmargin}\\item[\\hskip\\labelsep\n \\bfseries\\abstractname]}\n {\\endlist}\n\n\\newdimen\\headlineindent % dimension for space between\n\\headlineindent=1.166cm % number and text of headings.\n\n\\def\\ps@headings{\\let\\@mkboth\\@gobbletwo\n \\let\\@oddfoot\\@empty\\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n \\def\\@evenhead{\\normalfont\\small\\rlap{\\thepage}\\hspace{\\headlineindent}%\n \\leftmark\\hfil}\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\normalfont\\small\\hfil\\rightmark\\hspace{\\headlineindent}%\n \\llap{\\thepage}}\n \\def\\chaptermark##1{}%\n \\def\\sectionmark##1{}%\n \\def\\subsectionmark##1{}}\n\n\\def\\ps@titlepage{\\let\\@mkboth\\@gobbletwo\n \\let\\@oddfoot\\@empty\\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n \\def\\@evenhead{\\normalfont\\small\\rlap{\\thepage}\\hspace{\\headlineindent}%\n \\hfil}\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\normalfont\\small\\hfil\\hspace{\\headlineindent}%\n \\llap{\\thepage}}\n \\def\\chaptermark##1{}%\n \\def\\sectionmark##1{}%\n \\def\\subsectionmark##1{}}\n\n\\if@runhead\\ps@headings\\else\n\\ps@empty\\fi\n\n\\setlength\\arraycolsep{1.4\\p@}\n\\setlength\\tabcolsep{1.4\\p@}\n\n\\endinput\n%end of file llncs.cls\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.bib\n================================================\n% Long form of conference & journal abbreviations -- especially for camera ready\n@String(PAMI = {IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.})\n@String(IJCV = {Int. J. Comput. Vis.})\n@String(CVPR = {IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog.})\n@String(ICCV = {Int. Conf. Comput. Vis.})\n@String(ECCV = {Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis.})\n@String(NeurIPS = {Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst.})\n@String(ICML = {Int. Conf. Mach. Learn.})\n@String(ICLR = {Int. Conf. Learn. Represent.})\n@String(ACCV = {Asian Conf. Comput. Vis.})\n@String(BMVC = {Brit. Mach. Vis. Conf.})\n@String(CVPRW = {IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog. Worksh.})\n@String(AAAI = {AAAI})\n@String(IJCAI = {IJCAI})\n@String(ICIP = {IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process.})\n@String(ICPR = {Int. Conf. Pattern Recog.})\n@String(ICASSP=\t{ICASSP})\n@String(ICME = {Int. Conf. Multimedia and Expo})\n@String(JMLR = {J. Mach. Learn. Res.})\n@String(TMLR = {Trans. Mach. Learn Res.})\n@String(TOG = {ACM Trans. Graph.})\n@String(TIP = {IEEE Trans. Image Process.})\n@String(TVCG = {IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.})\n@String(TCSVT = {IEEE Trans. Circuit Syst. Video Technol.})\n@String(TMM = {IEEE Trans. Multimedia})\n@String(ACMMM = {ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia})\n@String(PR = {Pattern Recognition})\n\n@String(MNI\t = {Nature Mach. Intell.})\n@String(SPL\t = {IEEE Sign. Process. Letters})\n@String(VR = {Vis. Res.})\n@String(JOV\t = {J. Vis.})\n@String(TVC = {The Vis. Comput.})\n@String(JCST = {J. Comput. Sci. Tech.})\n@String(CGF = {Comput. Graph. Forum})\n@String(CVM = {Computational Visual Media})\n\n\n% Short form of conference & journal abbreviations -- especially for submission version\n% if desired, remove these macros in favor of the above ones\n@String(PAMI = {IEEE TPAMI})\n@String(IJCV = {IJCV})\n@String(CVPR = {CVPR})\n@String(ICCV = {ICCV})\n@String(ECCV = {ECCV})\n@String(NeurIPS = {NeurIPS})\n@String(ICML = {ICML})\n@String(ICLR = {ICLR})\n@String(ACCV = {ACCV})\n@String(BMVC =\t{BMVC})\n@String(CVPRW = {CVPRW})\n@String(AAAI = {AAAI})\n@String(IJCAI = {IJCAI})\n@String(ICIP = {ICIP})\n@String(ICPR = {ICPR})\n@String(ICASSP=\t{ICASSP})\n@String(ICME =\t{ICME})\n@String(JMLR = {JMLR})\n@String(TMLR = {TMLR})\n@String(TOG = {ACM TOG})\n@String(TIP = {IEEE TIP})\n@String(TVCG = {IEEE TVCG})\n@String(TCSVT = {IEEE TCSVT})\n@String(TMM =\t{IEEE TMM})\n@String(ACMMM = {ACM MM})\n@String(PR = {PR})\n\n\n\n% Update arxiv bib to conferece: 1. article->inproceedings; 2. journal->booktitle; 3. arxiv->conference\n\n@inproceedings{saito2019pifu,\n title={Pifu: Pixel-aligned implicit function for high-resolution clothed human digitization},\n author={Saito, Shunsuke and Huang, Zeng and Natsume, Ryota and Morishima, Shigeo and Kanazawa, Angjoo and Li, Hao},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision},\n pages={2304--2314},\n year={2019}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{saito2020pifuhd,\n title={Pifuhd: Multi-level pixel-aligned implicit function for high-resolution 3d human digitization},\n author={Saito, Shunsuke and Simon, Tomas and Saragih, Jason and Joo, Hanbyul},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition},\n pages={84--93},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{xiu2022icon,\n title={Icon: Implicit clothed humans obtained from normals},\n author={Xiu, Yuliang and Yang, Jinlong and Tzionas, Dimitrios and Black, Michael J},\n booktitle={2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n pages={13286--13296},\n year={2022},\n organization={IEEE}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{xiu2023econ,\n title={Econ: Explicit clothed humans optimized via normal integration},\n author={Xiu, Yuliang and Yang, Jinlong and Cao, Xu and Tzionas, Dimitrios and Black, Michael J},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition},\n pages={512--523},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{ho2024sith,\n title={Sith: Single-view textured human reconstruction with image-conditioned diffusion},\n author={Ho, I and Song, Jie and Hilliges, Otmar and others},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={538--549},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2024sifu,\n title={Sifu: Side-view conditioned implicit function for real-world usable clothed human reconstruction},\n author={Zhang, Zechuan and Yang, Zongxin and Yang, Yi},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={9936--9947},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{peng2024charactergen,\n title={Charactergen: Efficient 3d character generation from single images with multi-view pose canonicalization},\n author={Peng, Hao-Yang and Zhang, Jia-Peng and Guo, Meng-Hao and Cao, Yan-Pei and Hu, Shi-Min},\n journal={ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)},\n volume={43},\n number={4},\n pages={1--13},\n year={2024},\n publisher={ACM New York, NY, USA}\n}\n\n@article{pan2024humansplat,\n title={HumanSplat: Generalizable Single-Image Human Gaussian Splatting with Structure Priors},\n author={Pan, Panwang and Su, Zhuo and Lin, Chenguo and Fan, Zhen and Zhang, Yongjie and Li, Zeming and Shen, Tingting and Mu, Yadong and Liu, Yebin},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12459},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{zhou2024drawingspinup,\n title={DrawingSpinUp: 3D Animation from Single Character Drawings},\n author={Zhou, Jie and Xiao, Chufeng and Lam, Miu-Ling and Fu, Hongbo},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08615},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{cao2022jiff,\n title={Jiff: Jointly-aligned implicit face function for high quality single view clothed human reconstruction},\n author={Cao, Yukang and Chen, Guanying and Han, Kai and Yang, Wenqi and Wong, Kwan-Yee K},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={2729--2739},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{song2023difu,\n title={Difu: Depth-guided implicit function for clothed human reconstruction},\n author={Song, Dae-Young and Lee, HeeKyung and Seo, Jeongil and Cho, Donghyeon},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={8738--8747},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{hong2023lrm,\n title={Lrm: Large reconstruction model for single image to 3d},\n author={Hong, Yicong and Zhang, Kai and Gu, Jiuxiang and Bi, Sai and Zhou, Yang and Liu, Difan and Liu, Feng and Sunkavalli, Kalyan and Bui, Trung and Tan, Hao},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04400},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{weng2024single,\n title={Single-view 3d human digitalization with large reconstruction models},\n author={Weng, Zhenzhen and Liu, Jingyuan and Tan, Hao and Xu, Zhan and Zhou, Yang and Yeung-Levy, Serena and Yang, Jimei},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12175},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{tang2025lgm,\n title={Lgm: Large multi-view gaussian model for high-resolution 3d content creation},\n author={Tang, Jiaxiang and Chen, Zhaoxi and Chen, Xiaokang and Wang, Tengfei and Zeng, Gang and Liu, Ziwei},\n booktitle={European Conference on Computer Vision},\n pages={1--18},\n year={2025},\n organization={Springer}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{huang2020arch,\n title={Arch: Animatable reconstruction of clothed humans},\n author={Huang, Zeng and Xu, Yuanlu and Lassner, Christoph and Li, Hao and Tung, Tony},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={3093--3102},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{he2021arch++,\n title={Arch++: Animation-ready clothed human reconstruction revisited},\n author={He, Tong and Xu, Yuanlu and Saito, Shunsuke and Soatto, Stefano and Tung, Tony},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision},\n pages={11046--11056},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@article{feng2022fof,\n title={Fof: Learning fourier occupancy field for monocular real-time human reconstruction},\n author={Feng, Qiao and Liu, Yebin and Lai, Yu-Kun and Yang, Jingyu and Li, Kun},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={35},\n pages={7397--7409},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{zheng2021pamir,\n title={Pamir: Parametric model-conditioned implicit representation for image-based human reconstruction},\n author={Zheng, Zerong and Yu, Tao and Liu, Yebin and Dai, Qionghai},\n journal={IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence},\n volume={44},\n number={6},\n pages={3170--3184},\n year={2021},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{hu2024animate,\n title={Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video synthesis for character animation},\n author={Hu, Li},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={8153--8163},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{zhu2024champ,\n title={Champ: Controllable and consistent human image animation with 3d parametric guidance},\n author={Zhu, Shenhao and Chen, Junming Leo and Dai, Zuozhuo and Xu, Yinghui and Cao, Xun and Yao, Yao and Zhu, Hao and Zhu, Siyu},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14781},\n year={2024}\n}\n@inproceedings{xu2024magicanimate,\n title={Magicanimate: Temporally consistent human image animation using diffusion model},\n author={Xu, Zhongcong and Zhang, Jianfeng and Liew, Jun Hao and Yan, Hanshu and Liu, Jia-Wei and Zhang, Chenxu and Feng, Jiashi and Shou, Mike Zheng},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={1481--1490},\n year={2024}\n}\n@inproceedings{men2025mimo,\n title={Mimo: Controllable character video synthesis with spatial decomposed modeling},\n author={Men, Yifang and Yao, Yuan and Cui, Miaomiao and Bo, Liefeng},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference},\n pages={21181--21191},\n year={2025}\n}\n@article{shao2024360,\n title={360-degree human video generation with 4d diffusion transformer},\n author={Shao, Ruizhi and Pang, Youxin and Zheng, Zerong and Sun, Jingxiang and Liu, Yebin},\n journal={ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)},\n volume={43},\n number={6},\n pages={1--13},\n year={2024},\n publisher={ACM New York, NY, USA}\n}\n\n@article{men2024mimo,\n title={MIMO: Controllable Character Video Synthesis with Spatial Decomposed Modeling},\n author={Men, Yifang and Yao, Yuan and Cui, Miaomiao and Bo, Liefeng},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16160},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{rombach2022high,\n title={High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models},\n author={Rombach, Robin and Blattmann, Andreas and Lorenz, Dominik and Esser, Patrick and Ommer, Bj{\\\"o}rn},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition},\n pages={10684--10695},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Hu_2023_ICCV,\n author = {Hu, Shoukang and Hong, Fangzhou and Pan, Liang and Mei, Haiyi and Yang, Lei and Liu, Ziwei},\n title = {SHERF: Generalizable Human NeRF from a Single Image},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)},\n month = {October},\n year = {2023},\n pages = {9352-9364}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{huang2024tech,\n title={{TeCH: Text-guided Reconstruction of Lifelike Clothed Humans}},\n author={Huang, Yangyi and Yi, Hongwei and Xiu, Yuliang and Liao, Tingting and Tang, Jiaxiang and Cai, Deng and Thies, Justus},\n booktitle={International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV)},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{smplx:2019,\n title={Expressive body capture: 3d hands, face, and body from a single image},\n author={Pavlakos, Georgios and Choutas, Vasileios and Ghorbani, Nima and Bolkart, Timo and Osman, Ahmed AA and Tzionas, Dimitrios and Black, Michael J},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2019}\n}\n\n\n@article{loper2015smpl,\n title={SMPL: a skinned multi-person linear model},\n author={Loper, Matthew and Mahmood, Naureen and Romero, Javier and Pons-Moll, Gerard and Black, Michael J},\n journal={TOG},\n volume={34},\n number={6},\n pages={1--16},\n year={2015},\n publisher={ACM New York, NY, USA}\n}\n\n@misc{MHR:2025,\n title={MHR: Momentum Human Rig},\n author={Aaron Ferguson and Ahmed A. A. Osman and Berta Bescos and Carsten Stoll and Chris Twigg and Christoph Lassner and David Otte and Eric Vignola and Fabian Prada and Federica Bogo and Igor Santesteban and Javier Romero and Jenna Zarate and Jeongseok Lee and Jinhyung Park and Jinlong Yang and John Doublestein and Kishore Venkateshan and Kris Kitani and Ladislav Kavan and Marco Dal Farra and Matthew Hu and Matthew Cioffi and Michael Fabris and Michael Ranieri and Mohammad Modarres and Petr Kadlecek and Rawal Khirodkar and Rinat Abdrashitov and Romain Prévost and Roman Rajbhandari and Ronald Mallet and Russell Pearsall and Sandy Kao and Sanjeev Kumar and Scott Parrish and Shoou-I Yu and Shunsuke Saito and Takaaki Shiratori and Te-Li Wang and Tony Tung and Yichen Xu and Yuan Dong and Yuhua Chen and Yuanlu Xu and Yuting Ye and Zhongshi Jiang},\n year={2025},\n eprint={2511.15586},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.GR},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15586},\n}\n\n@Article{kerbl3Dgaussians,\n author = {Kerbl, Bernhard and Kopanas, Georgios and Leimk{\\\"u}hler, Thomas and Drettakis, George},\n title = {3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Rendering},\n journal = {TOG},\n year = {2023},\n url = {https://repo-sam.inria.fr/fungraph/3d-gaussian-splatting/}\n}\n\n@article{ho2020denoising,\n title={Denoising diffusion probabilistic models},\n author={Ho, Jonathan and Jain, Ajay and Abbeel, Pieter},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={33},\n pages={6840--6851},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@article{song2020denoising,\n title={Denoising diffusion implicit models},\n author={Song, Jiaming and Meng, Chenlin and Ermon, Stefano},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@misc{liu2024humanvdm,\n title={Human-VDM: Learning Single-Image 3D Human Gaussian Splatting from Video Diffusion Models}, \n author={Zhibin Liu and Haoye Dong and Aviral Chharia and Hefeng Wu},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2409.02851},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.02851}, \n}\n\n@inproceedings{zheng2024gpsgaussian,\n title={GPS-Gaussian: Generalizable Pixel-wise 3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-time Human Novel View Synthesis},\n author={Zheng, Shunyuan and Zhou, Boyao and Shao, Ruizhi and Liu, Boning and Zhang, Shengping and Nie, Liqiang and Liu, Yebin},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@misc{zhang2024sifusideviewconditionedimplicit,\n title={SIFU: Side-view Conditioned Implicit Function for Real-world Usable Clothed Human Reconstruction}, \n author={Zechuan Zhang and Zongxin Yang and Yi Yang},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2312.06704},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06704}, \n}\n\n@misc{men2024en3denhancedgenerativemodel,\n title={En3D: An Enhanced Generative Model for Sculpting 3D Humans from 2D Synthetic Data}, \n author={Yifang Men and Biwen Lei and Yuan Yao and Miaomiao Cui and Zhouhui Lian and Xuansong Xie},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2401.01173},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01173}, \n}\n\n@misc{he2024magicmangenerativenovelview,\n title={MagicMan: Generative Novel View Synthesis of Humans with 3D-Aware Diffusion and Iterative Refinement}, \n author={Xu He and Xiaoyu Li and Di Kang and Jiangnan Ye and Chaopeng Zhang and Liyang Chen and Xiangjun Gao and Han Zhang and Zhiyong Wu and Haolin Zhuang},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2408.14211},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.14211}, \n}\n\n@InProceedings{Wu_2024_CVPR,\n author = {Wu, Guanjun and Yi, Taoran and Fang, Jiemin and Xie, Lingxi and Zhang, Xiaopeng and Wei, Wei and Liu, Wenyu and Tian, Qi and Wang, Xinggang},\n title = {4D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Dynamic Scene Rendering},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2024},\n pages = {20310-20320}\n}\n\n@article{hong2022cogvideo,\n title={CogVideo: Large-scale Pretraining for Text-to-Video Generation via Transformers},\n author={Hong, Wenyi and Ding, Ming and Zheng, Wendi and Liu, Xinghan and Tang, Jie},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15868},\n year={2022}\n}\n@article{yang2024cogvideox,\n title={CogVideoX: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models with An Expert Transformer},\n author={Yang, Zhuoyi and Teng, Jiayan and Zheng, Wendi and Ding, Ming and Huang, Shiyu and Xu, Jiazheng and Yang, Yuanming and Hong, Wenyi and Zhang, Xiaohan and Feng, Guanyu and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{Peebles2022DiT,\n title={Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers},\n author={William Peebles and Saining Xie},\n year={2022},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09748},\n}\n\n\n\n@inproceedings{kplanes_2023,\n title={K-Planes: Explicit Radiance Fields in Space, Time, and Appearance},\n author={{Sara Fridovich-Keil and Giacomo Meanti} and Frederik Rahbæk Warburg and Benjamin Recht and Angjoo Kanazawa},\n year={2023},\n booktitle={CVPR}\n}\n\n@article{Cao2023HexPlane,\nauthor = {Cao, Ang and Johnson, Justin},\ntitle = {HexPlane: A Fast Representation for Dynamic Scenes},\njournal = {CVPR},\nyear = {2023},\n}\n\n@inproceedings{TiNeuVox,\n author = {Fang, Jiemin and Yi, Taoran and Wang, Xinggang and Xie, Lingxi and Zhang, Xiaopeng and Liu, Wenyu and Nie\\ss{}ner, Matthias and Tian, Qi},\n title = {Fast Dynamic Radiance Fields with Time-Aware Neural Voxels},\n year = {2022},\n booktitle = {SIGGRAPH Asia 2022 Conference Papers}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{shao2023tensor4d,\ntitle = {Tensor4D: Efficient Neural 4D Decomposition for High-fidelity Dynamic Reconstruction and Rendering},\nauthor = {Shao, Ruizhi and Zheng, Zerong and Tu, Hanzhang and Liu, Boning and Zhang, Hongwen and Liu, Yebin},\nbooktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\nyear = {2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{lin2022fite,\n title={Learning Implicit Templates for Point-Based Clothed Human Modeling},\n author={Lin, Siyou and Zhang, Hongwen and Zheng, Zerong and Shao, Ruizhi and Liu, Yebin},\n booktitle={ECCV},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{palfinger2022continuous,\n title={Continuous remeshing for inverse rendering},\n author={Palfinger, Werner},\n journal={Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds},\n volume={33},\n number={5},\n pages={e2101},\n year={2022},\n publisher={Wiley Online Library}\n}\n\n@article{Laine2020diffrast,\n title = {Modular Primitives for High-Performance Differentiable Rendering},\n author = {Samuli Laine and Janne Hellsten and Tero Karras and Yeongho Seol and Jaakko Lehtinen and Timo Aila},\n journal = {ACM Transactions on Graphics},\n year = {2020},\n volume = {39},\n number = {6}\n}\n\n@article{ravi2024sam2,\n title={SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos},\n author={Ravi, Nikhila and Gabeur, Valentin and Hu, Yuan-Ting and Hu, Ronghang and Ryali, Chaitanya and Ma, Tengyu and Khedr, Haitham and R{\\\"a}dle, Roman and Rolland, Chloe and Gustafson, Laura and Mintun, Eric and Pan, Junting and Alwala, Kalyan Vasudev and Carion, Nicolas and Wu, Chao-Yuan and Girshick, Ross and Doll{\\'a}r, Piotr and Feichtenhofer, Christoph},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00714},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00714},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{dnerf,\n title={D-NeRF: Neural Radiance Fields for Dynamic Scenes},\n author={Pumarola, Albert and Corona, Enric and Pons-Moll, Gerard and Moreno-Noguer, Francesc},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13961},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{physgaussian,\n title={Physgaussian: Physics-integrated 3d gaussians for generative dynamics},\n author={Xie, Tianyi and Zong, Zeshun and Qiu, Yuxing and Li, Xuan and Feng, Yutao and Yang, Yin and Jiang, Chenfanfu},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n\n## single-image recon\n@misc{choutas2022accurate3dbodyshape,\n title={Accurate 3D Body Shape Regression using Metric and Semantic Attributes}, \n author={Vasileios Choutas and Lea Muller and Chun-Hao P. Huang and Siyu Tang and Dimitrios Tzionas and Michael J. Black},\n year={2022},\n eprint={2206.07036},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07036}, \n}\n\n@misc{kanazawa2018endtoendrecoveryhumanshape,\n title={End-to-end Recovery of Human Shape and Pose}, \n author={Angjoo Kanazawa and Michael J. Black and David W. Jacobs and Jitendra Malik},\n year={2018},\n eprint={1712.06584},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.06584}, \n}\n\n@misc{kocabas2020vibevideoinferencehuman,\n title={VIBE: Video Inference for Human Body Pose and Shape Estimation}, \n author={Muhammed Kocabas and Nikos Athanasiou and Michael J. Black},\n year={2020},\n eprint={1912.05656},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.05656}, \n}\n\n@misc{kolotouros2019learningreconstruct3dhuman,\n title={Learning to Reconstruct 3D Human Pose and Shape via Model-fitting in the Loop}, \n author={Nikos Kolotouros and Georgios Pavlakos and Michael J. Black and Kostas Daniilidis},\n year={2019},\n eprint={1909.12828},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.12828}, \n}\n\n@misc{saito2021scanimateweaklysupervisedlearning,\n title={SCANimate: Weakly Supervised Learning of Skinned Clothed Avatar Networks}, \n author={Shunsuke Saito and Jinlong Yang and Qianli Ma and Michael J. Black},\n year={2021},\n eprint={2104.03313},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.03313}, \n}\n\n@misc{smith2019facsimilefastaccuratescans,\n title={FACSIMILE: Fast and Accurate Scans From an Image in Less Than a Second}, \n author={David Smith and Matthew Loper and Xiaochen Hu and Paris Mavroidis and Javier Romero},\n year={2019},\n eprint={1909.00883},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.00883}, \n}\n\n@misc{sun2022puttingpeopleplacemonocular,\n title={Putting People in their Place: Monocular Regression of 3D People in Depth}, \n author={Yu Sun and Wu Liu and Qian Bao and Yili Fu and Tao Mei and Michael J. Black},\n year={2022},\n eprint={2112.08274},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.08274}, \n}\n\n## single-image clothed recon\n@misc{alldieck2019learningreconstructpeopleclothing,\n title={Learning to Reconstruct People in Clothing from a Single RGB Camera}, \n author={Thiemo Alldieck and Marcus Magnor and Bharat Lal Bhatnagar and Christian Theobalt and Gerard Pons-Moll},\n year={2019},\n eprint={1903.05885},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.05885}, \n}\n\n@misc{alldieck2018detailedhumanavatarsmonocular,\n title={Detailed Human Avatars from Monocular Video}, \n author={Thiemo Alldieck and Marcus Magnor and Weipeng Xu and Christian Theobalt and Gerard Pons-Moll},\n year={2018},\n eprint={1808.01338},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.01338}, \n}\n\n@misc{alldieck2018videobasedreconstruction3d,\n title={Video Based Reconstruction of 3D People Models}, \n author={Thiemo Alldieck and Marcus Magnor and Weipeng Xu and Christian Theobalt and Gerard Pons-Moll},\n year={2018},\n eprint={1803.04758},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04758}, \n}\n\n@misc{alldieck2019tex2shapedetailedhumanbody,\n title={Tex2Shape: Detailed Full Human Body Geometry From a Single Image}, \n author={Thiemo Alldieck and Gerard Pons-Moll and Christian Theobalt and Marcus Magnor},\n year={2019},\n eprint={1904.08645},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.08645}, \n}\n\n@misc{lazova2019360degreetexturespeopleclothing,\n title={360-Degree Textures of People in Clothing from a Single Image}, \n author={Verica Lazova and Eldar Insafutdinov and Gerard Pons-Moll},\n year={2019},\n eprint={1908.07117},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.07117}, \n}\n\n@article{PonsMoll2017ClothCap,\n title={ClothCap},\n author={Gerard Pons-Moll and Sergi Pujades and Sonny Hu and Michael J. Black},\n journal={ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)},\n year={2017},\n volume={36},\n pages={1 - 15},\n url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:12569740}\n}\n\n@misc{xiang2020monoclothcaptemporallycoherentclothing,\n title={MonoClothCap: Towards Temporally Coherent Clothing Capture from Monocular RGB Video}, \n author={Donglai Xiang and Fabian Prada and Chenglei Wu and Jessica Hodgins},\n year={2020},\n eprint={2009.10711},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.10711}, \n}\n\n@misc{zhu2019detailedhumanshapeestimation,\n title={Detailed Human Shape Estimation from a Single Image by Hierarchical Mesh Deformation}, \n author={Hao Zhu and Xinxin Zuo and Sen Wang and Xun Cao and Ruigang Yang},\n year={2019},\n eprint={1904.10506},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.10506}, \n}\n\n@misc{bhatnagar2019multigarmentnetlearningdress,\n title={Multi-Garment Net: Learning to Dress 3D People from Images}, \n author={Bharat Lal Bhatnagar and Garvita Tiwari and Christian Theobalt and Gerard Pons-Moll},\n year={2019},\n eprint={1908.06903},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.06903}, \n}\n\n@misc{jiang2020bcnetlearningbodycloth,\n title={BCNet: Learning Body and Cloth Shape from A Single Image}, \n author={Boyi Jiang and Juyong Zhang and Yang Hong and Jinhao Luo and Ligang Liu and Hujun Bao},\n year={2020},\n eprint={2004.00214},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.00214}, \n}\n\n@misc{xiu2023econexplicitclothedhumans,\n title={ECON: Explicit Clothed humans Optimized via Normal integration}, \n author={Yuliang Xiu and Jinlong Yang and Xu Cao and Dimitrios Tzionas and Michael J. Black},\n year={2023},\n eprint={2212.07422},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.07422}, \n}\n\n\n## animatable human recon GAN\n@misc{hong2022eva3dcompositional3dhuman,\n title={EVA3D: Compositional 3D Human Generation from 2D Image Collections}, \n author={Fangzhou Hong and Zhaoxi Chen and Yushi Lan and Liang Pan and Ziwei Liu},\n year={2022},\n eprint={2210.04888},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.04888}, \n}\n\n@misc{yang20233dhumangan3dawarehumanimage,\n title={3DHumanGAN: 3D-Aware Human Image Generation with 3D Pose Mapping}, \n author={Zhuoqian Yang and Shikai Li and Wayne Wu and Bo Dai},\n year={2023},\n eprint={2212.07378},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.07378}, \n}\n\n@misc{dong2023ag3dlearninggenerate3d,\n title={AG3D: Learning to Generate 3D Avatars from 2D Image Collections}, \n author={Zijian Dong and Xu Chen and Jinlong Yang and Michael J. Black and Otmar Hilliges and Andreas Geiger},\n year={2023},\n eprint={2305.02312},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02312}, \n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{10.5555/1281957.1281965,\nauthor = {Kazhdan, Michael and Bolitho, Matthew and Hoppe, Hugues},\ntitle = {Poisson surface reconstruction},\nyear = {2006},\nisbn = {3905673363},\npublisher = {Eurographics Association},\naddress = {Goslar, DEU},\nabstract = {We show that surface reconstruction from oriented points can be cast as a spatial Poisson problem. This Poisson formulation considers all the points at once, without resorting to heuristic spatial partitioning or blending, and is therefore highly resilient to data noise. Unlike radial basis function schemes, our Poisson approach allows a hierarchy of locally supported basis functions, and therefore the solution reduces to a well conditioned sparse linear system. We describe a spatially adaptive multiscale algorithm whose time and space complexities are proportional to the size of the reconstructed model. Experimenting with publicly available scan data, we demonstrate reconstruction of surfaces with greater detail than previously achievable.},\nbooktitle = {Proceedings of the Fourth Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing},\npages = {61–70},\nnumpages = {10},\nlocation = {Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy},\nseries = {SGP '06}\n}\n\n@misc{zheng2020pamirparametricmodelconditionedimplicit,\n title={PaMIR: Parametric Model-Conditioned Implicit Representation for Image-based Human Reconstruction}, \n author={Zerong Zheng and Tao Yu and Yebin Liu and Qionghai Dai},\n year={2020},\n eprint={2007.03858},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.03858}, \n}\n\n@misc{huang2020archanimatablereconstructionclothed,\n title={ARCH: Animatable Reconstruction of Clothed Humans}, \n author={Zeng Huang and Yuanlu Xu and Christoph Lassner and Hao Li and Tony Tung},\n year={2020},\n eprint={2004.04572},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.GR},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04572}, \n}\n\n@misc{he2022archanimationreadyclothedhuman,\n title={ARCH++: Animation-Ready Clothed Human Reconstruction Revisited}, \n author={Tong He and Yuanlu Xu and Shunsuke Saito and Stefano Soatto and Tony Tung},\n year={2022},\n eprint={2108.07845},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07845}, \n}\n\n@misc{alldieck2022photorealisticmonocular3dreconstruction,\n title={Photorealistic Monocular 3D Reconstruction of Humans Wearing Clothing}, \n author={Thiemo Alldieck and Mihai Zanfir and Cristian Sminchisescu},\n year={2022},\n eprint={2204.08906},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.08906}, \n}\n\n@misc{corona2023structured3dfeaturesreconstructing,\n title={Structured 3D Features for Reconstructing Controllable Avatars}, \n author={Enric Corona and Mihai Zanfir and Thiemo Alldieck and Eduard Gabriel Bazavan and Andrei Zanfir and Cristian Sminchisescu},\n year={2023},\n eprint={2212.06820},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.06820}, \n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{han2023highfidelity3dhumandigitization,\n title={High-fidelity 3D Human Digitization from Single 2K Resolution Images},\n author={Han, Sang-Hun and Park, Min-Gyu and Yoon, Ju Hong and Kang, Ju-Mi and Park, Young-Jae and Jeon, Hae-Gon},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n\n@misc{chen2024ultramansingleimage3d,\n title={Ultraman: Single Image 3D Human Reconstruction with Ultra Speed and Detail}, \n author={Mingjin Chen and Junhao Chen and Xiaojun Ye and Huan-ang Gao and Xiaoxue Chen and Zhaoxin Fan and Hao Zhao},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2403.12028},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12028}, \n}\n\n\n\n@inproceedings{qiu2023recmv,\n title={REC-MV: REconstructing 3D Dynamic Cloth from Monocular Videos},\n author={Lingteng Qiu and Guanying Chen},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{ye2024stablenormal,\n title={StableNormal: Reducing Diffusion Variance for Stable and Sharp Normal},\n author={Ye Chongjie and Qiu Lingteng and Gu Xiaodong and Zuo Qi and Wu Yushuang and Dong Zilong and Bo Liefeng and Xiu Yuliang and Han Xiaoguang},\n journal={ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)},\n year={2024},\n publisher={ACM New York, NY, USA}\n}\n\n@article{zhuphysicalpbr,\n title={TextMV: Physical-Consistent Multi-view PBR Generation},\n author={Shenhao Zhu and Qiu Lingteng and Gu Xiaodong},\n year={2025},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n}\n\n@inproceedings{long2024wonder3d,\n title={Wonder3d: Single image to 3d using cross-domain diffusion},\n author={Long, Xiaoxiao and Guo, Yuan-Chen and Lin, Cheng and Liu, Yuan and Dou, Zhiyang and Liu, Lingjie and Ma, Yuexin and Zhang, Song-Hai and Habermann, Marc and Theobalt, Christian and others},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={9970--9980},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{khirodkar2024sapiens,\n title={Sapiens: Foundation for human vision models},\n author={Khirodkar, Rawal and Bagautdinov, Timur and Martinez, Julieta and Zhaoen, Su and James, Austin and Selednik, Peter and Anderson, Stuart and Saito, Shunsuke},\n booktitle={European Conference on Computer Vision},\n pages={206--228},\n year={2024},\n organization={Springer}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{mildenhall2020nerf,\n title={{NeRF}: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis},\n author={Mildenhall, Ben and Srinivasan, Pratul P and Tancik, Matthew and Barron, Jonathan T and Ramamoorthi, Ravi and Ng, Ren},\n booktitle=ECCV,\n pages={405--421},\n year={2020},\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{multi-hmr2024,\n title={Multi-HMR: Multi-Person Whole-Body Human Mesh Recovery in a Single Shot},\n author={Baradel*, Fabien and \n Armando, Matthieu and \n Galaaoui, Salma and \n Br{\\'e}gier, Romain and \n Weinzaepfel, Philippe and \n Rogez, Gr{\\'e}gory and\n Lucas*, Thomas\n },\n booktitle={ECCV},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@software{\n accurig,\n author = {actorcore},\n title = {accurig, a software for automatic character rigging},\n url = {https://actorcore.reallusion.com/auto-rig/accurig},\n year = {2023}\n}\n<<<<<<< HEAD\n@inproceedings{yang2024deformable,\n title={Deformable 3d gaussians for high-fidelity monocular dynamic scene reconstruction},\n author={Yang, Ziyi and Gao, Xinyu and Zhou, Wen and Jiao, Shaohui and Zhang, Yuqing and Jin, Xiaogang},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={20331--20341},\n year={2024}\n}\n@article{luiten2023dynamic,\n title={Dynamic 3d gaussians: Tracking by persistent dynamic view synthesis},\n author={Luiten, Jonathon and Kopanas, Georgios and Leibe, Bastian and Ramanan, Deva},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.09713},\n year={2023}\n}\n@inproceedings{zuo2024videomv,\n title={VideoMV: Consistent Multi-View Generation Based on Large Video Generative Model}, \n author={Qi Zuo and Xiaodong Gu and Lingteng Qiu and Yuan Dong and Zhengyi Zhao and Weihao Yuan and Rui Peng and Siyu Zhu and Zilong Dong and Liefeng Bo and Qixing Huang},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2403.12010},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV}\n}\n\n@article{shi2023mvdream,\n title={Mvdream: Multi-view diffusion for 3d generation},\n author={Shi, Yichun and Wang, Peng and Ye, Jianglong and Long, Mai and Li, Kejie and Yang, Xiao},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16512},\n year={2023}\n}\n@article{huang2024dreamwaltz,\n title={Dreamwaltz: Make a scene with complex 3d animatable avatars},\n author={Huang, Yukun and Wang, Jianan and Zeng, Ailing and Cao, He and Qi, Xianbiao and Shi, Yukai and Zha, Zheng-Jun and Zhang, Lei},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={36},\n year={2024}\n}\n@misc{chen2024meshavatar,\n title={MeshAvatar: Learning High-quality Triangular Human Avatars from Multi-view Videos}, \n author={Yushuo Chen and Zerong Zheng and Zhe Li and Chao Xu and Yebin Liu},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2407.08414},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.08414}, \n}\n@inproceedings{li2024animatable,\n title={Animatable gaussians: Learning pose-dependent gaussian maps for high-fidelity human avatar modeling},\n author={Li, Zhe and Zheng, Zerong and Wang, Lizhen and Liu, Yebin},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={19711--19722},\n year={2024}\n}\n@article{kolotouros2024dreamhuman,\n title={Dreamhuman: Animatable 3d avatars from text},\n author={Kolotouros, Nikos and Alldieck, Thiemo and Zanfir, Andrei and Bazavan, Eduard and Fieraru, Mihai and Sminchisescu, Cristian},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={36},\n year={2024}\n}\n@inproceedings{peng2021animatable,\n title={Animatable neural radiance fields for modeling dynamic human bodies},\n author={Peng, Sida and Dong, Junting and Wang, Qianqian and Zhang, Shangzhan and Shuai, Qing and Zhou, Xiaowei and Bao, Hujun},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision},\n pages={14314--14323},\n year={2021}\n}\n@inproceedings{weng2022humannerf,\n title={Humannerf: Free-viewpoint rendering of moving people from monocular video},\n author={Weng, Chung-Yi and Curless, Brian and Srinivasan, Pratul P and Barron, Jonathan T and Kemelmacher-Shlizerman, Ira},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{jiang2022selfrecon,\n title={SelfRecon: Self Reconstruction Your Digital Avatar from Monocular Video},\n author={Jiang, Boyi and Hong, Yang and Bao, Hujun and Zhang, Juyong},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2022}\n}\n@inproceedings{poole2022dreamfusion,\n title={Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion},\n author={Poole, Ben and Jain, Ajay and Barron, Jonathan T and Mildenhall, Ben},\n booktitle=ICLR,\n year={2023}\n}\n@inproceedings{cao2024dreamavatar,\n title={Dreamavatar: Text-and-shape guided 3d human avatar generation via diffusion models},\n author={Cao, Yukang and Cao, Yan-Pei and Han, Kai and Shan, Ying and Wong, Kwan-Yee K},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={958--968},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{tao2021function4d,\ntitle={Function4D: Real-time Human Volumetric Capture from Very Sparse Consumer RGBD Sensors},\nauthor={Yu, Tao and Zheng, Zerong and Guo, Kaiwen and Liu, Pengpeng and Dai, Qionghai and Liu, Yebin},\nbooktitle={IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\nmonth={June},\nyear={2021}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{ho2023custom,\n title={Learning locally editable virtual humans},\n author={Ho, Hsuan-I and Xue, Lixin and Song, Jie and Hilliges, Otmar},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={21024--21035},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{Kingma2014AdamAM,\n title={Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization},\n author={Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba},\n journal={CoRR},\n year={2014},\n volume={abs/1412.6980},\n}\n@misc{yang2024samurai,\n title={SAMURAI: Adapting Segment Anything Model for Zero-Shot Visual Tracking with Motion-Aware Memory}, \n author={Cheng-Yen Yang and Hsiang-Wei Huang and Wenhao Chai and Zhongyu Jiang and Jenq-Neng Hwang},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2411.11922},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.11922}, \n}\n\n\n@article{shao2024human4dit,\ntitle={Human4DiT: 360-degree Human Video Generation with 4D Diffusion Transformer},\nauthor={Shao, Ruizhi and Pang, Youxin and Zheng, Zerong and Sun, Jingxiang and Liu, Yebin},\njournal={TOG},\nvolume={43},\nnumber={6},\narticleno={},\nyear={2024}, publisher={ACM New York, NY, USA}\n}\n\n\n@misc{oquab2023dinov2,\n title={DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision},\n author={Oquab, Maxime and Darcet, Timothée and Moutakanni, Theo and Vo, Huy V. and Szafraniec, Marc and Khalidov, Vasil and Fernandez, Pierre and Haziza, Daniel and Massa, Francisco and El-Nouby, Alaaeldin and Howes, Russell and Huang, Po-Yao and Xu, Hu and Sharma, Vasu and Li, Shang-Wen and Galuba, Wojciech and Rabbat, Mike and Assran, Mido and Ballas, Nicolas and Synnaeve, Gabriel and Misra, Ishan and Jegou, Herve and Mairal, Julien and Labatut, Patrick and Joulin, Armand and Bojanowski, Piotr},\n journal={arXiv:2304.07193},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{esser2024scaling,\n title={Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis},\n author={Esser, Patrick and Kulal, Sumith and Blattmann, Andreas and Entezari, Rahim and M{\\\"u}ller, Jonas and Saini, Harry and Levi, Yam and Lorenz, Dominik and Sauer, Axel and Boesel, Frederic and others},\n booktitle={ICML},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{zhuang2024idol,\n title={IDOL: Instant Photorealistic 3D Human Creation from a Single Image},\n author={Zhuang, Yiyu and Lv, Jiaxi and Wen, Hao and Shuai, Qing and Zeng, Ailing and Zhu, Hao and Chen, Shifeng and Yang, Yujiu and Cao, Xun and Liu, Wei},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14963},\n year={2024}\n}\n@article{lu2025gas,\n title={GAS: Generative Avatar Synthesis from a Single Image},\n author={Lu, Yixing and Dong, Junting and Kwon, Youngjoong and Zhao, Qin and Dai, Bo and De la Torre, Fernando},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.06957},\n year={2025}\n}\n@article{lin2025omnihuman,\n title={OmniHuman-1: Rethinking the Scaling-Up of One-Stage Conditioned Human Animation Models},\n author={Lin, Gaojie and Jiang, Jianwen and Yang, Jiaqi and Zheng, Zerong and Liang, Chao},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01061},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{MaskedAutoencoders2022,\n author = {Kaiming He and Xinlei Chen and Saining Xie and Yanghao Li and Piotr Doll{\\'a}r and Ross Girshick},\n booktitle = {CVPR},\n title = {Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners},\n year = {2022},\n}\n@article{weng2024template,\n title={Template-free single-view 3d human digitalization with diffusion-guided lrm},\n author={Weng, Zhenzhen and Liu, Jingyuan and Tan, Hao and Xu, Zhan and Zhou, Yang and Yeung-Levy, Serena and Yang, Jimei},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12175},\n year={2024}\n}\n@article{pan2025humansplat,\n title={Humansplat: Generalizable single-image human gaussian splatting with structure priors},\n author={Pan, Panwang and Su, Zhuo and Lin, Chenguo and Fan, Zhen and Zhang, Yongjie and Li, Zeming and Shen, Tingting and Mu, Yadong and Liu, Yebin},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={37},\n pages={74383--74410},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2023globalcorrelated,\n title={Global-correlated 3D-decoupling Transformer for Clothed Avatar Reconstruction}, \n author={Zhang, Zechuan and Sun, Li and Yang, Zongxin and Chen, Ling and Yang, Yi},\n booktitle={NeurIPS},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{tang2023dreamgaussian,\n title={DreamGaussian: Generative Gaussian Splatting for Efficient 3D Content Creation},\n author={Tang, Jiaxiang and Ren, Jiawei and Zhou, Hang and Liu, Ziwei and Zeng, Gang},\n booktitle={ICLR},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{deng2019arcface,\n title={Arcface: Additive angular margin loss for deep face recognition},\n author={Deng, Jiankang and Guo, Jia and Xue, Niannan and Zafeiriou, Stefanos},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n pages={4690--4699},\n year={2019}\n }\n\n@inproceedings{liuLQWTcvpr16DeepFashion,\n author = {Liu, Ziwei and Luo, Ping and Qiu, Shi and Wang, Xiaogang and Tang, Xiaoou},\n title = {DeepFashion: Powering Robust Clothes Recognition and Retrieval with Rich Annotations},\n booktitle = {CVPR},\n month = {June},\n year = {2016}\n }\n\n\n@article{li2024pshuman,\n title={PSHuman: Photorealistic Single-view Human Reconstruction using Cross-Scale Diffusion},\n author={Li, Peng and Zheng, Wangguandong and Liu, Yuan and Yu, Tao and Li, Yangguang and Qi, Xingqun and Li, Mengfei and Chi, Xiaowei and Xia, Siyu and Xue, Wei and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.10141},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{xiong2024mvhumannet,\n title={MVHumanNet: A Large-scale Dataset of Multi-view Daily Dressing Human Captures},\n author={Xiong, Zhangyang and Li, Chenghong and Liu, Kenkun and Liao, Hongjie and Hu, Jianqiao and Zhu, Junyi and Ning, Shuliang and Qiu, Lingteng and Wang, Chongjie and Wang, Shijie and others},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{bib:havefun,\n title={HAVE-FUN: Human Avatar Reconstruction from Few-Shot Unconstrained Images},\n author={Yang, Xihe and Chen, Xingyu and Gao, Daiheng and Wang, Shaohui and Han, Xiaoguang and Wang, Baoyuan},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{moon2024exavatar,\n title={Expressive Whole-Body 3D Gaussian Avatar},\n author = {Moon, Gyeongsik and Shiratori, Takaaki and Saito, Shunsuke}, \n booktitle={ECCV},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{xiu2024puzzleavatar,\n title={PuzzleAvatar: Assembling 3D Avatars from Personal Albums},\n author={Xiu, Yuliang and Ye, Yufei and Liu, Zhen and Tzionas, Dimitrios and Black, Michael J},\n journal={TOG},\n year={2024},\n publisher={ACM New York, NY, USA}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{li2024animatablegaussians,\n title={Animatable Gaussians: Learning Pose-dependent Gaussian Maps for High-fidelity Human Avatar Modeling},\n author={Li, Zhe and Zheng, Zerong and Wang, Lizhen and Liu, Yebin},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{hu2023gauhuman,\n title={GauHuman: Articulated Gaussian Splatting from Monocular Human Videos},\n author={Hu, Shoukang and Liu, Ziwei},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{XAGen2023,\n title={XAGen: 3D Expressive Human Avatars Generation},\n author={Xu, Zhongcong and Zhang, Jianfeng and Liew, Junhao and Feng, Jiashi and Shou, Mike Zheng},\n booktitle={NeurIPS},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{tan2025dressrecon,\n title={DressRecon: Freeform 4D Human Reconstruction from Monocular Video},\n author={Tan, Jeff and Xiang, Donglai and Tulsiani, Shubham and Ramanan, Deva and Yang, Gengshan},\n booktitle={3DV},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{lsavatar2025,\n title={Locality Sensitive Avatars From Video},\n author={Song, Chunjin and Wu, Zhijie and Su, Shih-Yang and Wandt, Bastian and Sigal, Leonid and Rhodin, Helge},\n booktitle={The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{Pang2024Disco4DD4,\n title={Disco4D: Disentangled 4D Human Generation and Animation from a Single Image},\n author={Hui En Pang and Shuai Liu and Zhongang Cai and Lei Yang and Tianwei Zhang and Ziwei Liu},\n journal={ArXiv},\n year={2024},\n volume={abs/2409.17280},\n}\n\n@inproceedings{yu2023monohuman,\n title={MonoHuman: Animatable Human Neural Field from Monocular Video},\n author={Yu, Zhengming and Cheng, Wei and Liu, Xian and Wu, Wayne and Lin, Kwan-Yee},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{qiu2024AniGS,\n title={AniGS: Animatable Gaussian Avatar from a Single Image with Inconsistent Gaussian Reconstruction},\n author={Qiu, Lingteng and Zhu, Shenhao and Zuo, Qi and Gu, Xiaodong and Dong, Yuan and Zhang, Junfei and Xu, Chao and Li, Zhe and Yuan, Weihao and Bo, Liefeng and others},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{huang2023humannorm,\n title={Humannorm: Learning normal diffusion model for high-quality and realistic 3d human generation},\n author={Huang, Xin and Shao, Ruizhi and Zhang, Qi and Zhang, Hongwen and Feng, Ying and Liu, Yebin and Wang, Qing},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01406},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{qiu2025lhm,\n title={LHM: Large Animatable Human Reconstruction Model for Single Image to 3D in Seconds},\n author={Qiu, Lingteng and Gu, Xiaodong and Li, Peihao and Zuo, Qi and Shen, Weichao and Zhang, Junfei and Qiu, Kejie and Yuan, Weihao and Chen, Guanying and Dong, Zilong and others},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision},\n pages={14184--14194},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{qiu2025pflhm,\n title={PF-LHM: 3D Animatable Avatar Reconstruction from Pose-free Articulated Human Images},\n author={Qiu, Lingteng and Li, Peihao and Zuo, Qi and Gu, Xiaodong and Dong, Yuan and Yuan, Weihao and Zhu, Siyu and Han, Xiaoguang and Chen, Guanying and Dong, Zilong},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.13766},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{cheng2025wananimate,\n title={Wan-Animate: Unified Character Animation and Replacement with Holistic Replication},\n author={Cheng, Gang and Gao, Xin and Hu, Li and Hu, Siqi and Huang, Mingyang and Ji, Chaonan and Li, Ju and Meng, Dechao and Qi, Jinwei and Qiao, Penchong and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.14055},\n year={2025}\n}\n@inproceedings{guo2023vid2avatar,\n title={Vid2avatar: 3d avatar reconstruction from videos in the wild via self-supervised scene decomposition},\n author={Guo, Chen and Jiang, Tianjian and Chen, Xu and Song, Jie and Hilliges, Otmar},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={12858--12868},\n year={2023}\n}\n@inproceedings{guo2025vid2avatar,\n title={Vid2avatar-pro: Authentic avatar from videos in the wild via universal prior},\n author={Guo, Chen and Li, Junxuan and Kant, Yash and Sheikh, Yaser and Saito, Shunsuke and Cao, Chen},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference},\n pages={5559--5570},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{cai2025up2you,\n title={UP2You: Fast Reconstruction of Yourself from Unconstrained Photo Collections},\n author={Cai, Zeyu and Li, Ziyang and Li, Xiaoben and Li, Boqian and Wang, Zeyu and Zhang, Zhenyu and Xiu, Yuliang},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.24817},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{moon2024expressive,\n title={Expressive whole-body 3d gaussian avatar},\n author={Moon, Gyeongsik and Shiratori, Takaaki and Saito, Shunsuke},\n booktitle={European Conference on Computer Vision},\n pages={19--35},\n year={2024},\n organization={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{chen2025synchuman,\n title={SyncHuman: Synchronizing 2D and 3D Generative Models for Single-view Human Reconstruction},\n author={Chen, Wenyue and Li, Peng and Zheng, Wangguandong and Zhao, Chengfeng and Li, Mengfei and Zhu, Yaolong and Dou, Zhiyang and Wang, Ronggang and Liu, Yuan},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.07723},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zheng2023learning,\n title={Learning visibility field for detailed 3D human reconstruction and relighting},\n author={Zheng, Ruichen and Li, Peng and Wang, Haoqian and Yu, Tao},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={216--226},\n year={2023}\n}\n@inproceedings{zhuang2025idol,\n title={Idol: Instant photorealistic 3d human creation from a single image},\n author={Zhuang, Yiyu and Lv, Jiaxi and Wen, Hao and Shuai, Qing and Zeng, Ailing and Zhu, Hao and Chen, Shifeng and Yang, Yujiu and Cao, Xun and Liu, Wei},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={26308--26319},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{yang2026sam3dbody,\n title={SAM 3D Body: Robust Full-Body Human Mesh Recovery},\n author={Yang, Xitong and Kukreja, Devansh and Pinkus, Don and Sagar, Anushka and Fan, Taosha and Park, Jinhyung and Shin, Soyong and Cao, Jinkun and Liu, Jiawei and Ugrinovic, Nicolas and Feiszli, Matt and Malik, Jitendra and Dollar, Piotr and Kitani, Kris},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15989},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{jiang2022neuman,\n title={NeuMan: Neural Human Radiance Field from a Single Video},\n author={Jiang, Wei and Yi, Kwang Moo and Samei, Golnoosh and Tuzel, Oncel and Ranjan, Anurag},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV)},\n year={2022}\n}\n@InProceedings{Kanazawa_2019_CVPR,\nauthor = {Kanazawa, Angjoo and Zhang, Jason Y. and Felsen, Panna and Malik, Jitendra},\ntitle = {Learning 3D Human Dynamics From Video},\nbooktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\nmonth = {June},\nyear = {2019}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{du2023agrol,\n author = {Du, Yuming and Kips, Robin and Pumarola, Albert and Starke, Sebastian and Thabet, Ali and Sanakoyeu, Artsiom},\n title = {Avatars Grow Legs: Generating Smooth Human Motion from Sparse Tracking Inputs with Diffusion Model},\n booktitle = {CVPR},\n year = {2023},\n}\n\n\n#tan2025dressrecon Pang2024Disco4DD4 huang2023humannorm yu2023monohuman\n# taoavatar, GART, GaussianBody, animatablegaussians, GaussianBody\n# lhm, idol,\n# exavatr, vid2ava-pro\n\n\n@inproceedings{jiang2023instantavatar,\n author = {Jiang, Tianjian and Chen, Xu and Song, Jie and Hilliges, Otmar},\n title = {InstantAvatar: Learning Avatars from Monocular Video in 60 Seconds},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2023},\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{UBC-Fashion,\n author = {Polina Zablotskaia and\n Aliaksandr Siarohin and\n Bo Zhao and\n Leonid Sigal},\n title = {DwNet: Dense warp-based network for pose-guided human video generation},\n booktitle = {30th British Machine Vision Conference 2019, {BMVC} 2019, Cardiff,\n UK, September 9-12, 2019},\n pages = {51},\n publisher = {{BMVA} Press},\n year = {2019},\n timestamp = {Wed, 03 Feb 2021 08:36:05 +0100},\n biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/bmvc/ZablotskaiaSZS19.bib},\n bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{grigorev2023hood,\n title = {{HOOD}: Hierarchical Graphs for Generalized Modelling of Clothing Dynamics}, \n author = {Grigorev, Artur and Thomaszewski, Bernhard and Black, Michael J and Hilliges, Otmar}, \n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2023},\n}\n\n@inproceedings{patel20tailornet,\n title = {TailorNet: Predicting Clothing in 3D as a Function of Human Pose, Shape and Garment Style},\n author = {Patel, Chaitanya and Liao, Zhouyingcheng and Pons-Moll, Gerard},\n booktitle = {{IEEE} Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {jun},\n organization = {{IEEE}},\n year = {2020},\n }\n\n@InProceedings{Santesteban_2022_CVPR,\n author = {Santesteban, Igor and Otaduy, Miguel A. and Casas, Dan},\n title = {SNUG: Self-Supervised Neural Dynamic Garments},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2022},\n pages = {8140-8150}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{Feng2022scarf,\n author = {Feng, Yao and Yang, Jinlong and Pollefeys, Marc and Black, Michael J. and Bolkart, Timo},\n title = {Capturing and Animation of Body and Clothing from Monocular Video},\n year = {2022},\n booktitle = {SIGGRAPH Asia 2022 Conference Papers},\n articleno = {45},\n numpages = {9},\n location = {Daegu, Republic of Korea},\n series = {SA '22}\n} \n\n\n\n\n@inproceedings{10.1145/3528233.3530709,\nauthor = {Pan, Xiaoyu and Mai, Jiaming and Jiang, Xinwei and Tang, Dongxue and Li, Jingxiang and Shao, Tianjia and Zhou, Kun and Jin, Xiaogang and Manocha, Dinesh},\ntitle = {Predicting Loose-Fitting Garment Deformations Using Bone-Driven Motion Networks},\nyear = {2022},\nisbn = {9781450393379},\npublisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\naddress = {New York, NY, USA},\nbooktitle = {ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Conference Proceedings},\narticleno = {11},\nnumpages = {10},\nkeywords = {cloth animation, deep learning, skinning decomposition},\nlocation = {Vancouver, BC, Canada},\nseries = {SIGGRAPH '22}\n}\n\n@misc{lei2023gart,\n title={GART: Gaussian Articulated Template Models}, \n author={Jiahui Lei and Yufu Wang and Georgios Pavlakos and Lingjie Liu and Kostas Daniilidis},\n year={2023},\n eprint={2311.16099},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{icml2020_2086,\n author = {Gropp, Amos and Yariv, Lior and Haim, Niv and Atzmon, Matan and Lipman, Yaron},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems},\n pages = {3569--3579},\n title = {Implicit Geometric Regularization for Learning Shapes},\n year = {2020}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{Geman1987StatisticalMF,\n title={Statistical methods for tomographic image reconstruction},\n author={S. Geman and D. E. McClure},\n year={1987}\n}\n\n@article{Xu:2018:MHP:3191713.3181973,\n author = {Xu, Weipeng and Chatterjee, Avishek and Zollh\\\"{o}fer, Michael and Rhodin, Helge and Mehta, Dushyant and Seidel, Hans-Peter and Theobalt, Christian},\n title = {MonoPerfCap: Human Performance Capture From Monocular Video},\n journal = {SIGGRAPH},\n issue_date = {June 2018},\n volume = {37},\n number = {2},\n month = may,\n year = {2018},\n issn = {0730-0301},\n pages = {27:1--27:15},\n articleno = {27},\n numpages = {15},\n acmid = {3181973},\n publisher = {ACM},\n address = {New York, NY, USA}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{deepcap,\n title = {DeepCap: Monocular Human Performance Capture Using Weak Supervision},\n author = {Habermann, Marc and Xu, Weipeng and Zollhoefer, Michael and Pons-Moll, Gerard and Theobalt, Christian},\n booktitle = {{IEEE} Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {jun},\n organization = {{IEEE}},\n year = {2020},\n}\n\n@article {casado2022pergamo,\n journal = {Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. of SCA), 2022},\n title = {{PERGAMO}: Personalized 3D Garments from Monocular video},\n author = {Casado-Elvira, Andrés and Comino Trinidad, Marc and Casas, Dan},\n year = {2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{alldieck2018video,\n title={Video based reconstruction of 3d people models},\n author={Alldieck, Thiemo and Magnor, Marcus and Xu, Weipeng and Theobalt, Christian and Pons-Moll, Gerard},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={8387--8397},\n year={2018}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{guo2021human,\n title={Human Performance Capture from Monocular Video in the Wild},\n author={Guo, Chen and Chen, Xu and Song, Jie and Hilliges, Otmar},\n booktitle={2021 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV)},\n pages={889--898},\n year={2021},\n organization={IEEE}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Moon_2022_ECCV_ClothWild, \nauthor = {Moon, Gyeongsik and Nam, Hyeongjin and Shiratori, Takaaki and Lee, Kyoung Mu}, \ntitle = {3D Clothed Human Reconstruction in the Wild}, \nbooktitle = {European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)}, \nyear = {2022} \n}\n\n\n\n\n@InProceedings{weng_humannerf_2022_cvpr,\n title = {Human{N}e{RF}: Free-Viewpoint Rendering of Moving People From Monocular Video},\n author = {Weng, Chung-Yi and \n Curless, Brian and \n Srinivasan, Pratul P. and \n Barron, Jonathan T. and \n Kemelmacher-Shlizerman, Ira},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2022},\n pages = {16210-16220}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{su2022danbo,\n title={DANBO: Disentangled Articulated Neural Body Representations via Graph Neural Networks},\n author={Su, Shih-Yang and Bagautdinov, Timur and Rhodin, Helge},\n booktitle = {European Conference on Computer Vision},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{He_2021_ICCV,\n author = {He, Tong and Xu, Yuanlu and Saito, Shunsuke and Soatto, Stefano and Tung, Tony},\n title = {ARCH++: Animation-Ready Clothed Human Reconstruction Revisited},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)},\n month = {October},\n year = {2021},\n pages = {11046-11056}\n}\n\n\n\n@inproceedings{peng2021neural,\n title={Neural body: Implicit neural representations with structured latent codes for novel view synthesis of dynamic humans},\n author={Peng, Sida and Zhang, Yuanqing and Xu, Yinghao and Wang, Qianqian and Shuai, Qing and Bao, Hujun and Zhou, Xiaowei},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={9054--9063},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n\n\n\n@inproceedings{li2021deep,\n title={Deep physics-aware inference of cloth deformation for monocular human performance capture},\n author={Li, Yue and Habermann, Marc and Thomaszewski, Bernhard and Coros, Stelian and Beeler, Thabo and Theobalt, Christian},\n booktitle={2021 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV)},\n pages={373--384},\n year={2021},\n organization={IEEE}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{alldieck2022phorhum,\n title\t = {Photorealistic Monocular 3D Reconstruction of Humans Wearing Clothing},\n author = {Thiemo Alldieck and Mihai Zanfir and Cristian Sminchisescu},\n year\t = {2022},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{SMPL-X:2019,\n title = {Expressive Body Capture: {3D} Hands, Face, and Body from a Single Image},\n author = {Pavlakos, Georgios and Choutas, Vasileios and Ghorbani, Nima and Bolkart, Timo and Osman, Ahmed A. A. and Tzionas, Dimitrios and Black, Michael J.},\n booktitle = {Proceedings IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n pages = {10975--10985},\n year = {2019}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{yariv2020multiview,\n\t title={Multiview Neural Surface Reconstruction by Disentangling Geometry and Appearance},\n\t author={Yariv, Lior and Kasten, Yoni and Moran, Dror \n\t\t and Galun, Meirav and Atzmon, Matan and Ronen, Basri and Lipman, Yaron},\n\t booktitle={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n\t year={2020}\n\t}\n\n@inproceedings{yariv2021volume,\n\t title={Volume rendering of neural implicit surfaces},\n\t author={Yariv, Lior and Gu, Jiatao and Kasten, Yoni and Lipman, Yaron},\n\t booktitle={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n\t year={2021}\n\t}\n\n@article{Pons-Moll:Siggraph2017,\ntitle = {ClothCap: Seamless 4D Clothing Capture and Retargeting},\nauthor = {Pons-Moll, Gerard and Pujades, Sergi and Hu, Sonny and Black, Michael},\njournal = {ACM Transactions on Graphics, (Proc. SIGGRAPH)},\nvolume = {36},\nnumber = {4},\nyear = {2017},\nnote = {Two first authors contributed equally},\n}\n\n@article{chen2021tightcap,\n title={TightCap: 3D Human Shape Capture with Clothing Tightness Field},\n author={Chen, Xin and Pang, Anqi and Yang, Wei and Wang, Peihao and Xu, Lan and Yu, Jingyi},\n journal={ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)},\n volume={41},\n number={1},\n pages={1--17},\n year={2021},\n publisher={ACM New York, NY}\n}\n\n@article{10.1145/3478513.3480479,\n author = {Bertiche, Hugo and Madadi, Meysam and Escalera, Sergio},\n title = {PBNS: Physically Based Neural Simulation for Unsupervised Garment Pose Space Deformation},\n year = {2021},\n issue_date = {December 2021},\n publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\n address = {New York, NY, USA},\n volume = {40},\n number = {6},\n issn = {0730-0301},\n abstract = {We present a methodology to automatically obtain Pose Space Deformation (PSD) basis for rigged garments through deep learning. Classical approaches rely on Physically Based Simulations (PBS) to animate clothes. These are general solutions that, given a sufficiently fine-grained discretization of space and time, can achieve highly realistic results. However, they are computationally expensive and any scene modification prompts the need of re-simulation. Linear Blend Skinning (LBS) with PSD offers a lightweight alternative to PBS, though, it needs huge volumes of data to learn proper PSD. We propose using deep learning, formulated as an implicit PBS, to un-supervisedly learn realistic cloth Pose Space Deformations in a constrained scenario: dressed humans. Furthermore, we show it is possible to train these models in an amount of time comparable to a PBS of a few sequences. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to propose a neural simulator for cloth. While deep-based approaches in the domain are becoming a trend, these are data-hungry models. Moreover, authors often propose complex formulations to better learn wrinkles from PBS data. Supervised learning leads to physically inconsistent predictions that require collision solving to be used. Also, dependency on PBS data limits the scalability of these solutions, while their formulation hinders its applicability and compatibility. By proposing an unsupervised methodology to learn PSD for LBS models (3D animation standard), we overcome both of these drawbacks. Results obtained show cloth-consistency in the animated garments and meaningful pose-dependant folds and wrinkles. Our solution is extremely efficient, handles multiple layers of cloth, allows unsupervised outfit resizing and can be easily applied to any custom 3D avatar.},\n journal = {ACM Trans. Graph.},\n month = {dec},\n articleno = {198},\n numpages = {14},\n keywords = {physics, garment, simulation, deep learning, animation, pose space deformation, neural network}\n }\n\n@article{10.1145/3478513.3480545,\nauthor = {Xiang, Donglai and Prada, Fabian and Bagautdinov, Timur and Xu, Weipeng and Dong, Yuan and Wen, He and Hodgins, Jessica and Wu, Chenglei},\ntitle = {Modeling clothing as a separate layer for an animatable human avatar},\nyear = {2021},\nissue_date = {December 2021},\npublisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\naddress = {New York, NY, USA},\nvolume = {40},\nnumber = {6},\nissn = {0730-0301},\nabstract = {We have recently seen great progress in building photorealistic animatable full-body codec avatars, but generating high-fidelity animation of clothing is still difficult. To address these difficulties, we propose a method to build an animatable clothed body avatar with an explicit representation of the clothing on the upper body from multi-view captured videos. We use a two-layer mesh representation to register each 3D scan separately with the body and clothing templates. In order to improve the photometric correspondence across different frames, texture alignment is then performed through inverse rendering of the clothing geometry and texture predicted by a variational autoencoder. We then train a new two-layer codec avatar with separate modeling of the upper clothing and the inner body layer. To learn the interaction between the body dynamics and clothing states, we use a temporal convolution network to predict the clothing latent code based on a sequence of input skeletal poses. We show photorealistic animation output for three different actors, and demonstrate the advantage of our clothed-body avatars over the single-layer avatars used in previous work. We also show the benefit of an explicit clothing model that allows the clothing texture to be edited in the animation output.},\njournal = {ACM Trans. Graph.},\nmonth = {dec},\narticleno = {199},\nnumpages = {15},\nkeywords = {clothing animation, codec avatar}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{tiwari20sizer,\n title = {SIZER: A Dataset and Model for Parsing 3D Clothing and Learning Size Sensitive 3D Clothing},\n author = {Tiwari, Garvita and Bhatnagar, Bharat Lal and Tung, Tony and Pons-Moll, Gerard},\n booktitle = {European Conference on Computer Vision ({ECCV})},\n month = {August},\n organization = {{Springer}},\n year = {2020},\n}\n\n@inproceedings{corona2021smplicit,\n Author = {Enric Corona and Albert Pumarola and Guillem Aleny{\\`a} and Pons-Moll, Gerard and Moreno-Noguer, Francesc},\n Title = {SMPLicit: Topology-aware Generative Model for Clothed People},\n Year = {2021},\n booktitle = {CVPR},\n}\n\n@inproceedings{jiang2020bcnet,\n title={BCNet: Learning Body and Cloth Shape from A Single Image},\n author={Jiang, Boyi and Zhang, Juyong and Hong, Yang and Luo, Jinhao and Liu, Ligang and Bao, Hujun},\n booktitle={European Conference on Computer Vision},\n year={2020},\n organization={Springer}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Yu2019SimulCap,\n author = {Yu, Tao and Zheng, Zerong and Zhong, Yuan and Zhao, Jianhui and Dai, Qionghai and Pons-Moll, Gerard and Liu, Yebin},\n title = {SimulCap : Single-View Human Performance Capture with Cloth Simulation},\n booktitle = {The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR)},\n month={June},\n year={2019},\n publisher={IEEE},\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Zhu_2022_CVPR,\n author = {Zhu, Heming and Qiu, Lingteng and Qiu, Yuda and Han, Xiaoguang},\n title = {Registering Explicit to Implicit: Towards High-Fidelity Garment Mesh Reconstruction From Single Images},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2022},\n pages = {3845-3854}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{chibane2020ndf,\n title = {Neural Unsigned Distance Fields for Implicit Function Learning},\n author = {Chibane, Julian and Mir, Aymen and Pons-Moll, Gerard},\n booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems ({NeurIPS})},\n month = {December},\n year = {2020},\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Wang_2023_CVPR,\nauthor={Wang, Kangkan and Zhang, Guofeng and Cong, Suxu and Yang, Jian},\ntitle={Clothed Human Performance Capture With a Double-Layer Neural Radiance Fields},\nbooktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\nmonth={June},\nyear={2023},\npages={21098-21107}}\n\n@inproceedings{bhatnagar2019mgn,\n title = {Multi-Garment Net: Learning to Dress 3D People from Images},\n author = {Bhatnagar, Bharat Lal and Tiwari, Garvita and Theobalt, Christian and Pons-Moll, Gerard},\n booktitle = {{IEEE} International Conference on Computer Vision ({ICCV})},\n month = {oct},\n organization = {{IEEE}},\n year = {2019},\n}\n\n@inproceedings{ARAH:ECCV:2022,\n title = {ARAH: Animatable Volume Rendering of Articulated Human SDFs},\n author = {Shaofei Wang and Katja Schwarz and Andreas Geiger and Siyu Tang},\n booktitle = {European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)},\n year = {2022}\n}\n\n@article{collet2015msft,\nauthor = {Collet, Alvaro and Chuang, Ming and Sweeney, Pat and Gillett, Don and Evseev, Dennis and Calabrese, David and Hoppe, Hugues and Kirk, Adam and Sullivan, Steve},\ntitle = {High-Quality Streamable Free-Viewpoint Video},\nyear = {2015},\nissue_date = {August 2015},\npublisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\naddress = {New York, NY, USA},\nvolume = {34},\nnumber = {4},\nissn = {0730-0301},\nurl = {https://doi.org/10.1145/2766945},\ndoi = {10.1145/2766945},\njournal = {ACM Trans. Graph.},\nmonth = {jul},\narticleno = {69},\nnumpages = {13},\nkeywords = {mesh tracking, MPEG, multi-view stereo, 3D video, geometry compression, surface reconstruction}\n}\n\n@article{\n\thabermann2021,\n\tauthor = {Marc Habermann and Lingjie Liu and Weipeng Xu and Michael Zollhoefer and Gerard Pons-Moll and Christian Theobalt},\n\ttitle = {Real-time Deep Dynamic Characters},\n\tjournal = {ACM Transactions on Graphics}, \n\tmonth = {aug},\n\tvolume = {40},\n\tnumber = {4}, \n\tarticleno = {94},\n\tyear = {2021}, \n\tpublisher = {ACM}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2018perceptual,\n title={The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric},\n author={Zhang, Richard and Isola, Phillip and Efros, Alexei A and Shechtman, Eli and Wang, Oliver},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2018}\n}\n\n@article{kaizhang2020,\n author = {Kai Zhang and Gernot Riegler and Noah Snavely and Vladlen Koltun},\n title = {NeRF++: Analyzing and Improving Neural Radiance Fields},\n journal = {arXiv:2010.07492},\n year = {2020},\n}\n\n@article{Ricci1973ACG,\n title={A Constructive Geometry for Computer Graphics},\n author={A. Ricci},\n journal={Comput. J.},\n year={1973},\n volume={16},\n pages={157-160},\n url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:30038820}\n}\n\n@article{zhang2021editable,\n title={Editable free-viewpoint video using a layered neural representation},\n author={Zhang, Jiakai and Liu, Xinhang and Ye, Xinyi and Zhao, Fuqiang and Zhang, Yanshun and Wu, Minye and Zhang, Yingliang and Xu, Lan and Yu, Jingyi},\n journal={ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)},\n volume={40},\n number={4},\n pages={1--18},\n year={2021},\n publisher={ACM New York, NY, USA}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Kirillov_2023_ICCV,\n author = {Kirillov, Alexander and Mintun, Eric and Ravi, Nikhila and Mao, Hanzi and Rolland, Chloe and Gustafson, Laura and Xiao, Tete and Whitehead, Spencer and Berg, Alexander C. and Lo, Wan-Yen and Dollar, Piotr and Girshick, Ross},\n title = {Segment Anything},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)},\n month = {October},\n year = {2023},\n pages = {4015-4026}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{mescheder2019occupancy,\n title={Occupancy networks: Learning 3d reconstruction in function space},\n author={Mescheder, Lars and Oechsle, Michael and Niemeyer, Michael and Nowozin, Sebastian and Geiger, Andreas},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={4460--4470},\n year={2019}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zheng2022imavatar,\n title={{I} {M} {Avatar}: Implicit Morphable Head Avatars from Videos},\n author={Zheng, Yufeng and Abrevaya, Victoria Fernández and Bühler, Marcel C. and Chen, Xu and Black, Michael J. and Hilliges, Otmar},\n booktitle = {Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n year = {2022}\n}\n\n@article{Binh2012Skinning,\nauthor = {Le, Binh Huy and Deng, Zhigang},\ntitle = {Smooth skinning decomposition with rigid bones},\nyear = {2012},\nissue_date = {November 2012},\npublisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\naddress = {New York, NY, USA},\nvolume = {31},\nnumber = {6},\nissn = {0730-0301},\nurl = {https://doi.org/10.1145/2366145.2366218},\ndoi = {10.1145/2366145.2366218},\njournal = {ACM Trans. Graph.},\nmonth = {nov},\narticleno = {199},\nnumpages = {10},\nkeywords = {skinning decomposition, linear blend skinning, geometric deformation, block coordinate descent}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{what3d_cvpr19,\n\tauthor = {Maxim Tatarchenko* and Stephan R. Richter* and René Ranftl and Zhuwen Li and Vladlen Koltun and Thomas Brox},\n\ttitle = {What Do Single-view 3D Reconstruction Networks Learn?},\n\tjournal = {CVPR},\n\tyear = {2019}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{wang2003multiscale,\n title={Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment},\n author={Wang, Zhou and Simoncelli, Eero P and Bovik, Alan C},\n booktitle={The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems \\& Computers},\n volume={2},\n year={2003}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{NIPS2016_8a3363ab,\n author = {Salimans, Tim and Goodfellow, Ian and Zaremba, Wojciech and Cheung, Vicki and Radford, Alec and Chen, Xi and Chen, Xi},\n booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n editor = {D. Lee and M. Sugiyama and U. Luxburg and I. Guyon and R. Garnett},\n pages = {},\n publisher = {Curran Associates, Inc.},\n title = {Improved Techniques for Training GANs},\n url = {https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2016/file/8a3363abe792db2d8761d6403605aeb7-Paper.pdf},\n volume = {29},\n year = {2016}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{10.5555/3104322.3104425,\nauthor = {Nair, Vinod and Hinton, Geoffrey E.},\ntitle = {Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines},\nyear = {2010},\nisbn = {9781605589077},\npublisher = {Omnipress},\naddress = {Madison, WI, USA},\nabstract = {Restricted Boltzmann machines were developed using binary stochastic hidden units. These can be generalized by replacing each binary unit by an infinite number of copies that all have the same weights but have progressively more negative biases. The learning and inference rules for these \"Stepped Sigmoid Units\" are unchanged. They can be approximated efficiently by noisy, rectified linear units. Compared with binary units, these units learn features that are better for object recognition on the NORB dataset and face verification on the Labeled Faces in the Wild dataset. Unlike binary units, rectified linear units preserve information about relative intensities as information travels through multiple layers of feature detectors.},\nbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning},\npages = {807–814},\nnumpages = {8},\nlocation = {Haifa, Israel},\nseries = {ICML'10}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{goel2023humans,\n title={Humans in 4{D}: Reconstructing and Tracking Humans with Transformers},\n author={Goel, Shubham and Pavlakos, Georgios and Rajasegaran, Jathushan and Kanazawa*, Angjoo and Malik*, Jitendra},\n booktitle={International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{Kingma2015AdamAM,\n title={Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization},\n author={Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba},\n journal={CoRR},\n year={2015},\n volume={abs/1412.6980}\n}\n\n@conference{AMASS:ICCV:2019,\n title = {{AMASS}: Archive of Motion Capture as Surface Shapes},\n author = {Mahmood, Naureen and Ghorbani, Nima and Troje, Nikolaus F. and Pons-Moll, Gerard and Black, Michael J.},\n booktitle = {International Conference on Computer Vision},\n pages = {5442--5451},\n month = oct,\n year = {2019},\n month_numeric = {10}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{sam_hq,\n title={Segment Anything in High Quality},\n author={Ke, Lei and Ye, Mingqiao and Danelljan, Martin and Liu, Yifan and Tai, Yu-Wing and Tang, Chi-Keung and Yu, Fisher},\n booktitle={NeurIPS},\n year={2023}\n} \n\n@inproceedings{Gong2019Graphonomy,\nauthor = {Ke Gong and Yiming Gao and Xiaodan Liang and Xiaohui Shen and Meng Wang and Liang Lin},\ntitle = {Graphonomy: Universal Human Parsing via Graph Transfer Learning},\nbooktitle = {CVPR},\nyear = {2019},\n}\n\n@article{8765346,\n author = {Z. {Cao} and G. {Hidalgo Martinez} and T. {Simon} and S. {Wei} and Y. A. {Sheikh}},\n journal = {IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence},\n title = {OpenPose: Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation using Part Affinity Fields},\n year = {2019}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{lin2024relightable,\n author = {Lin, Wenbin and Zheng, Chengwei and Yong, Jun-Hai and Xu, Feng},\n title = {Relightable and Animatable Neural Avatars from Videos},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},\n year = {2024},\n}\n\n@Inproceedings{rajasegaran2021tracking,\n title = {Tracking People with 3D Representations},\n author = {Rajasegaran, Jathushan and Pavlakos, Georgios and Kanazawa, Angjoo and Malik, Jitendra},\n Booktitle = {NeurIPS},\n year = {2021}\n}\n\n\n@article{mueller2022instant,\n author = {Thomas M\\\"uller and Alex Evans and Christoph Schied and Alexander Keller},\n title = {Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encoding},\n journal = {ACM Trans. Graph.},\n issue_date = {July 2022},\n volume = {41},\n number = {4},\n month = jul,\n year = {2022},\n pages = {102:1--102:15},\n articleno = {102},\n numpages = {15},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3528223.3530127},\n doi = {10.1145/3528223.3530127},\n publisher = {ACM},\n address = {New York, NY, USA},\n}\n\n@InProceedings{zheng2022structured,\ntitle={Structured Local Radiance Fields for Human Avatar Modeling},\nauthor={Zheng, Zerong and Huang, Han and Yu, Tao and Zhang, Hongwen and Guo, Yandong and Liu, Yebin},\nbooktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\nmonth = {June},\nyear = {2022},\npages = {}\n}\n\n@article{su2022mulaycap,\n author={Su, Zhaoqi and Wan, Weilin and Yu, Tao and Liu, Lingjie and Fang, Lu and Wang, Wenping and Liu, Yebin},\n journal={IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics},\n title={MulayCap: Multi-Layer Human Performance Capture Using a Monocular Video Camera},\n year={2022},\n volume={28},\n number={4},\n pages={1862-1879},\n doi={10.1109/TVCG.2020.3027763}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{multiply,\n title={MultiPly: Reconstruction of Multiple People from Monocular Video in the Wild}, \n author={Jiang, Zeren and Guo, Chen and Kaufmann, Manuel and Jiang, Tianjian and Valentin, Julien and Hilliges, Otmar and Song, Jie},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2024},\n }\n\n@inproceedings{hu2024gaussianavatar,\n title={GaussianAvatar: Towards Realistic Human Avatar Modeling from a Single Video via Animatable 3D Gaussians},\n author={Hu, Liangxiao and Zhang, Hongwen and Zhang, Yuxiang and Zhou, Boyao and Liu, Boning and Zhang, Shengping and Nie, Liqiang},\n booktitle={IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{qian20233dgsavatar,\n title={3DGS-Avatar: Animatable Avatars via Deformable 3D Gaussian Splatting}, \n author={Zhiyin Qian and Shaofei Wang and Marko Mihajlovic and Andreas Geiger and Siyu Tang},\n booktitle={IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n year={2024},\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{kaufmann2023emdb,\n author = {Kaufmann, Manuel and Song, Jie and Guo, Chen and Shen, Kaiyue and Jiang, Tianjian and Tang, Chengcheng and Z{\\'a}rate, Juan Jos{\\'e} and Hilliges, Otmar},\n title = {{EMDB}: The {E}lectromagnetic {D}atabase of {G}lobal 3{D} {H}uman {P}ose and {S}hape in the {W}ild},\n booktitle = {International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)},\n year = {2023}\n}\n\n@article{10.1145/3528223.3530143,\nauthor = {Cao, Chen and Simon, Tomas and Kim, Jin Kyu and Schwartz, Gabe and Zollhoefer, Michael and Saito, Shun-Suke and Lombardi, Stephen and Wei, Shih-En and Belko, Danielle and Yu, Shoou-I and Sheikh, Yaser and Saragih, Jason},\ntitle = {Authentic volumetric avatars from a phone scan},\nyear = {2022},\nissue_date = {July 2022},\npublisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\naddress = {New York, NY, USA},\nvolume = {41},\nnumber = {4},\nissn = {0730-0301},\nurl = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3528223.3530143},\ndoi = {10.1145/3528223.3530143},\njournal = {ACM Trans. Graph.},\nmonth = jul,\narticleno = {163},\nnumpages = {19},\nkeywords = {3D avatar creation, neural rendering}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{chen2024urhand,\n title={{U}{R}Hand: Universal Relightable Hands},\n author={Zhaoxi Chen and Gyeongsik Moon and Kaiwen Guo and Chen Cao and Stanislav Pidhorskyi and Tomas Simon and Rohan Joshi and Yuan Dong and Yichen Xu and Bernardo Pires and He Wen and Lucas Evans and Bo Peng and Julia Buffalini and Autumn Trimble and Kevyn McPhail and Melissa Schoeller and Shoou-I Yu and Javier Romero and Michael Zollhöfer and Yaser Sheikh and Ziwei Liu and Shunsuke Saito},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{buhler2023preface,\n title={Preface: A Data-driven Volumetric Prior for Few-shot Ultra High-resolution Face Synthesis},\n author={B{\\\"u}hler, Marcel C and Sarkar, Kripasindhu and Shah, Tanmay and Li, Gengyan and Wang, Daoye and Helminger, Leonhard and Orts-Escolano, Sergio and Lagun, Dmitry and Hilliges, Otmar and Beeler, Thabo and others},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision},\n pages={3402--3413},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{buehler2024cafca,\n title={Cafca: High-quality Novel View Synthesis of Expressive Faces from Casual Few-shot Captures},\n author={Marcel C. Buehler and Gengyan Li and Erroll Wood and Leonhard Helminger and Xu Chen and Tanmay Shah and Daoye Wang and Stephan Garbin and Sergio Orts-Escolano and Otmar Hilliges and Dmitry Lagun and Jérémy Riviere and Paulo Gotardo and Thabo Beeler and Abhimitra Meka and Kripasindhu Sarkar},\n year={2024},\n booktitle={ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Paper},\n doi={10.1145/3680528.3687580},\n url={https://doi.org/10.1145/3680528}\n}\n\n\n@InProceedings{Lei_2024_CVPR,\n author = {Lei, Jiahui and Wang, Yufu and Pavlakos, Georgios and Liu, Lingjie and Daniilidis, Kostas},\n title = {GART: Gaussian Articulated Template Models},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2024},\n pages = {19876-19887}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{shao2024splattingavatar,\n title = {{SplattingAvatar: Realistic Real-Time Human Avatars with Mesh-Embedded Gaussian Splatting}},\n author = {Shao, Zhijing and Wang, Zhaolong and Li, Zhuang and Wang, Duotun and Lin, Xiangru and Zhang, Yu and Fan, Mingming and Wang, Zeyu},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n year = {2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{wen2024gomavatar,\n title={{GoMAvatar: Efficient Animatable Human Modeling from Monocular Video Using Gaussians-on-Mesh}},\n author={Jing Wen and Xiaoming Zhao and Zhongzheng Ren and Alex Schwing and Shenlong Wang},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{moreau2024human,\n title={Human gaussian splatting: Real-time rendering of animatable avatars},\n author={Moreau, Arthur and Song, Jifei and Dhamo, Helisa and Shaw, Richard and Zhou, Yiren and P{\\'e}rez-Pellitero, Eduardo},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{\n kocabas2024hugs,\n title={{HUGS}: Human Gaussian Splatting},\n author={Kocabas, Muhammed and Chang, Jen-Hao Rick and Gabriel, James and Tuzel, Oncel and Ranjan, Anurag},\n booktitle = {2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n year = {2024},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17910}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Hu_2024_CVPR,\n author = {Hu, Shoukang and Hu, Tao and Liu, Ziwei},\n title = {GauHuman: Articulated Gaussian Splatting from Monocular Human Videos},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2024},\n pages = {20418-20431}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Pang_2024_CVPR,\n author = {Pang, Haokai and Zhu, Heming and Kortylewski, Adam and Theobalt, Christian and Habermann, Marc},\n title = {ASH: Animatable Gaussian Splats for Efficient and Photoreal Human Rendering},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2024},\n pages = {1165-1175}\n}\n\n@misc{li2023human101,\n title={Human101: Training 100+FPS Human Gaussians in 100s from 1 View},\n author={Mingwei Li and Jiachen Tao and Zongxin Yang and Yi Yang},\n year={2023},\n eprint={2312.15258},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV}\n }\n\n@misc{jung2023deformable3dgaussiansplatting,\n title={Deformable 3D Gaussian Splatting for Animatable Human Avatars}, \n author={HyunJun Jung and Nikolas Brasch and Jifei Song and Eduardo Perez-Pellitero and Yiren Zhou and Zhihao Li and Nassir Navab and Benjamin Busam},\n year={2023},\n eprint={2312.15059},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.15059}, \n}\n\n@misc{svitov2024hahahighlyarticulatedgaussian,\n title={HAHA: Highly Articulated Gaussian Human Avatars with Textured Mesh Prior}, \n author={David Svitov and Pietro Morerio and Lourdes Agapito and Alessio Del Bue},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2404.01053},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01053}, \n}\n\n@misc{liu2024gvareconstructingvivid3d,\n title={GVA: Reconstructing Vivid 3D Gaussian Avatars from Monocular Videos}, \n author={Xinqi Liu and Chenming Wu and Jialun Liu and Xing Liu and Jinbo Wu and Chen Zhao and Haocheng Feng and Errui Ding and Jingdong Wang},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2402.16607},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16607}, \n}\n\n@misc{li2024gaussianbodyclothedhumanreconstruction,\n title={GaussianBody: Clothed Human Reconstruction via 3d Gaussian Splatting}, \n author={Mengtian Li and Shengxiang Yao and Zhifeng Xie and Keyu Chen},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2401.09720},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.09720}, \n}\n\n@inproceedings{xu2022sanerf,\n author = {Xu, Tianhan and Fujita, Yasuhiro and Matsumoto, Eiichi},\n title = {Surface-Aligned Neural Radiance Fields for Controllable 3D Human Synthesis},\n booktitle = {CVPR},\n year = {2022},\n}\n\n@inproceedings{HVTR:3DV2022,\n title={HVTR: Hybrid Volumetric-Textural Rendering for Human Avatars},\n author={Hu, Tao and Yu, Tao and Zheng, Zerong and Zhang, He and Liu, Yebin and Zwicker, Matthias},\n booktitle = {2022 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV)},\n year = {2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{2021narf,\n author = {Noguchi, Atsuhiro and Sun, Xiao and Lin, Stephen and Harada, Tatsuya},\n title = {Neural Articulated Radiance Field},\n booktitle = {International Conference on Computer Vision},\n year = {2021},\n}\n\n@inproceedings{li2022tava,\n title={TAVA: Template-free animatable volumetric actors},\n author={Li, Ruilong and Tanke, Julian and Vo, Minh and Zollhofer, Michael and Gall, Jurgen and Kanazawa, Angjoo and Lassner, Christoph},\n booktitle={European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2021stnerf,\n title={Editable Free-Viewpoint Video using a Layered Neural Representation},\n author={Jiakai, Zhang\n and Xinhang, Liu\n and Xinyi, Ye\n and Fuqiang, Zhao\n and Yanshun, Zhang\n and Minye, Wu\n and Yingliang, Zhang\n and Lan, Xu\n and Jingyi, Yu\n },\n year={2021},\n booktitle={ACM SIGGRAPH},\n }\n\n\n@article{zheng2023avatarrex,\nauthor={Zheng, Zerong and Zhao, Xiaochen and Zhang, Hongwen and Liu, Boning and Liu, Yebin},\ntitle={AvatarRex: Real-time Expressive Full-body Avatars},\njournal={ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)},\nvolume={42},\nnumber={4},\narticleno={},\nyear={2023}\n}\n\n@article{li2023posevocab,\nauthor={Li, Zhe and Zheng, Zerong and Liu, Yuxiao and Zhou, Boyao and Liu, Yebin},\ntitle={PoseVocab: Learning Joint-structured Pose Embeddings for Human Avatar Modeling},\njournal={ACM SIGGRAPH Conference Proceedings},\nyear={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{sun2024metacap,\ntitle = {MetaCap: Meta-learning Priors from Multi-View Imagery for Sparse-view Human Performance Capture and Rendering},\nauthor = {Sun, Guoxing and Dabral, Rishabh and Fua, Pascal and Theobalt, Christian and Habermann, Marc},\nyear = {2024},\nbooktitle={ECCV}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{MetaAvatar:NeurIPS:2021,\n title = {MetaAvatar: Learning Animatable Clothed Human Models from Few Depth Images},\n author = {Shaofei Wang and Marko Mihajlovic and Qianli Ma and Andreas Geiger and Siyu Tang},\n booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n year = {2021}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{kwon2021neural,\n title={Neural human performer: Learning generalizable radiance fields for human performance rendering},\n author={Kwon, Youngjoong and Kim, Dahun and Ceylan, Duygu and Fuchs, Henry},\n booktitle={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={34},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{kwon2024ghg,\n title={Generalizable Human Gaussians for Sparse View Synthesis},\n author={Youngjoong Kwon and Baole Fang and Yixing Lu and Haoye Dong and Cheng Zhang and Francisco Vicente Carrasco and Albert Mosella-Montoro and Jianjin Xu and Shingo Takagi and Daeil Kim and Aayush Prakash and Fernando De la Torre},\n booktitle={European Conference on Computer Vision},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Zhao_2022_CVPR,\n author = {Zhao, Fuqiang and Yang, Wei and Zhang, Jiakai and Lin, Pei and Zhang, Yingliang and Yu, Jingyi and Xu, Lan},\n title = {HumanNeRF: Efficiently Generated Human Radiance Field From Sparse Inputs},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2022},\n pages = {7743-7753}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{yu2025humanram,\n title={Humanram: Feed-forward human reconstruction and animation model using transformers},\n author={Yu, Zhiyuan and Li, Zhe and Bao, Hujun and Yang, Can and Zhou, Xiaowei},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Conference Papers},\n pages={1--13},\n year={2025}\n}\n@InProceedings{Chen_2023_CVPR,\n author = {Chen, Jianchuan and Yi, Wentao and Ma, Liqian and Jia, Xu and Lu, Huchuan},\n title = {GM-NeRF: Learning Generalizable Model-Based Neural Radiance Fields From Multi-View Images},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2023},\n pages = {20648-20658}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{chen2022gpnerf,\n\ttitle={Geometry-guided progressive NeRF for generalizable and efficient neural human rendering},\n\tauthor={Chen, Mingfei and Zhang, Jianfeng and Xu, Xiangyu and Liu, Lijuan and Cai, Yujun and Feng, Jiashi and Yan, Shuicheng},\n\tbooktitle={ECCV},\n\tyear={2022}\n}\n\n@article{liu2021neural,\n title={Neural Actor: Neural Free-view Synthesis of Human Actors with Pose Control}, \n author={Lingjie Liu and Marc Habermann and Viktor Rudnev and Kripasindhu Sarkar and Jiatao Gu and Christian Theobalt},\n year={2021},\n journal = {ACM Trans. Graph.(ACM SIGGRAPH Asia)}\n}\n\n@misc{zielonka2023drivable3dgaussianavatars,\n title={Drivable 3D Gaussian Avatars}, \n author={Wojciech Zielonka and Timur Bagautdinov and Shunsuke Saito and Michael Zollhöfer and Justus Thies and Javier Romero},\n year={2023},\n eprint={2311.08581},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08581}, \n}\n\n@inproceedings{remelli2022drivable,\n title={Drivable volumetric avatars using texel-aligned features},\n author={Remelli, Edoardo and Bagautdinov, Timur and Saito, Shunsuke and Wu, Chenglei and Simon, Tomas and Wei, Shih-En and Guo, Kaiwen and Cao, Zhe and Prada, Fabian and Saragih, Jason and others},\n booktitle={ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Conference Proceedings},\n pages={1--9},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{Saito:CVPR:2021,\n title = {{SCANimate}: Weakly Supervised Learning of Skinned Clothed Avatar Networks},\n author = {Saito, Shunsuke and Yang, Jinlong and Ma, Qianli and Black, Michael J.},\n booktitle = {Proceedings IEEE/CVF Conf.~on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = jun,\n year = {2021},\n month_numeric = {6}}\n\n@inproceedings{chen2021snarf,\n title={SNARF: Differentiable Forward Skinning for Animating Non-Rigid Neural Implicit Shapes},\n author={Chen, Xu and Zheng, Yufeng and Black, Michael J and Hilliges, Otmar and Geiger, Andreas},\n booktitle={International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{PhysAavatar24,\n title={PhysAvatar: Learning the Physics of Dressed 3D Avatars from Visual Observations},\n author={Yang Zheng and Qingqing Zhao and Guandao Yang and Wang Yifan and Donglai Xiang and Florian Dubost and Dmitry Lagun and Thabo Beeler and Federico Tombari and Leonidas Guibas and Gordon Wetzstein},\n booktitle={European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{10.1145/3610548.3618136,\nauthor = {Xiang, Donglai and Prada, Fabian and Cao, Zhe and Guo, Kaiwen and Wu, Chenglei and Hodgins, Jessica and Bagautdinov, Timur},\ntitle = {Drivable Avatar Clothing: Faithful Full-Body Telepresence with Dynamic Clothing Driven by Sparse RGB-D Input},\nyear = {2023},\nisbn = {9798400703157},\npublisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\naddress = {New York, NY, USA},\nurl = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3610548.3618136},\ndoi = {10.1145/3610548.3618136},\nbooktitle = {SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Conference Papers},\narticleno = {24},\nnumpages = {11},\nkeywords = {Telepresence, clothing capture, photorealistic avatars},\nlocation = {Sydney, NSW, Australia},\nseries = {SA '23}\n}\n\n\n@misc{feng2023foflearningfourieroccupancy,\n title={FOF: Learning Fourier Occupancy Field for Monocular Real-time Human Reconstruction}, \n author={Qiao Feng and Yebin Liu and Yu-Kun Lai and Jingyu Yang and Kun Li},\n year={2023},\n eprint={2206.02194},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.02194}, \n}\n\n@article{10.1145/3697140,\n\tauthor = {Zhu, Heming and Zhan, Fangneng and Theobalt, Christian and Habermann, Marc},\n\ttitle = {TriHuman: A Real-time and Controllable Tri-plane Representation for Detailed Human Geometry and Appearance Synthesis},\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tpublisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\n\taddress = {New York, NY, USA},\n\tissn = {0730-0301},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3697140},\n\tdoi = {10.1145/3697140},\n\tjournal = {ACM Trans. Graph.},\n\tmonth = sep\n}\n\n@article{wang2021neus,\n title={NeuS: Learning Neural Implicit Surfaces by Volume Rendering for Multi-view Reconstruction}, \n author={Peng Wang and Lingjie Liu and Yuan Liu and Christian Theobalt and Taku Komura and Wenping Wang},\n\t journal={NeurIPS},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{saito2024rgca,\n author = {Shunsuke Saito and Gabriel Schwartz and Tomas Simon and Junxuan Li and Giljoo Nam},\n title = {Relightable Gaussian Codec Avatars}, \n booktitle = {CVPR},\n year = {2024},\n}\n\n@inproceedings{li2024uravatar,\n author = {Junxuan Li and Chen Cao and Gabriel Schwartz and Rawal Khirodkar and Christian Richardt and Tomas Simon and Yaser Sheikh and Shunsuke Saito},\n title = {URAvatar: Universal Relightable Gaussian Codec Avatars}, \n booktitle = {ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers},\n year = {2024},\n}\n\n\n@InProceedings{unet,\nauthor=\"Ronneberger, Olaf\nand Fischer, Philipp\nand Brox, Thomas\",\neditor=\"Navab, Nassir\nand Hornegger, Joachim\nand Wells, William M.\nand Frangi, Alejandro F.\",\ntitle=\"U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation\",\nbooktitle=\"Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention -- MICCAI 2015\",\nyear=\"2015\",\npublisher=\"Springer International Publishing\",\naddress=\"Cham\",\npages=\"234--241\",\nabstract=\"There is large consent that successful training of deep networks requires many thousand annotated training samples. In this paper, we present a network and training strategy that relies on the strong use of data augmentation to use the available annotated samples more efficiently. The architecture consists of a contracting path to capture context and a symmetric expanding path that enables precise localization. We show that such a network can be trained end-to-end from very few images and outperforms the prior best method (a sliding-window convolutional network) on the ISBI challenge for segmentation of neuronal structures in electron microscopic stacks. Using the same network trained on transmitted light microscopy images (phase contrast and DIC) we won the ISBI cell tracking challenge 2015 in these categories by a large margin. Moreover, the network is fast. Segmentation of a 512x512 image takes less than a second on a recent GPU. The full implementation (based on Caffe) and the trained networks are available at http://lmb.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/people/ronneber/u-net.\",\nisbn=\"978-3-319-24574-4\"\n}\n\n@article{bagautdinov2021driving,\n title={Driving-signal aware full-body avatars},\n author={Bagautdinov, Timur and Wu, Chenglei and Simon, Tomas and Prada, Fabi{\\'a}n and Shiratori, Takaaki and Wei, Shih-En and Xu, Weipeng and Sheikh, Yaser and Saragih, Jason},\n journal={ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)},\n volume={40},\n number={4},\n pages={1--17},\n year={2021},\n publisher={ACM New York, NY, USA}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{su2021anerf,\n title={A-NeRF: Articulated Neural Radiance Fields for Learning Human Shape, Appearance, and Pose},\n author={Su, Shih-Yang and Yu, Frank and Zollh{\\\"o}fer, Michael and Rhodin, Helge},\n booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Moon_2024_CVPR,\n author = {Moon, Gyeongsik and Xu, Weipeng and Joshi, Rohan and Wu, Chenglei and Shiratori, Takaaki},\n title = {Authentic Hand Avatar from a Phone Scan via Universal Hand Model},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2024},\n pages = {2029-2038}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Corona_2022_CVPR,\n author = {Corona, Enric and Hodan, Tomas and Vo, Minh and Moreno-Noguer, Francesc and Sweeney, Chris and Newcombe, Richard and Ma, Lingni},\n title = {LISA: Learning Implicit Shape and Appearance of Hands},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2022},\n pages = {20533-20543}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Joo_2018_CVPR,\nauthor = {Joo, Hanbyul and Simon, Tomas and Sheikh, Yaser},\ntitle = {Total Capture: A 3D Deformation Model for Tracking Faces, Hands, and Bodies},\nbooktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\nmonth = {June},\nyear = {2018}\n}\n\n\n@InProceedings{Sun_2024_CVPR,\n author = {Sun, Qingping and Wang, Yanjun and Zeng, Ailing and Yin, Wanqi and Wei, Chen and Wang, Wenjia and Mei, Haiyi and Leung, Chi-Sing and Liu, Ziwei and Yang, Lei and Cai, Zhongang},\n title = {AiOS: All-in-One-Stage Expressive Human Pose and Shape Estimation},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2024},\n pages = {1834-1843}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{10.1007/978-3-031-73235-5_12,\nauthor=\"Khirodkar, Rawal\nand Bagautdinov, Timur\nand Martinez, Julieta\nand Zhaoen, Su\nand James, Austin\nand Selednik, Peter\nand Anderson, Stuart\nand Saito, Shunsuke\",\neditor=\"Leonardis, Ale{\\v{s}}\nand Ricci, Elisa\nand Roth, Stefan\nand Russakovsky, Olga\nand Sattler, Torsten\nand Varol, G{\\\"u}l\",\ntitle=\"Sapiens: Foundation for Human Vision Models\",\nbooktitle=\"Computer Vision -- ECCV 2024\",\nyear=\"2025\",\npublisher=\"Springer Nature Switzerland\",\naddress=\"Cham\",\npages=\"206--228\",\nisbn=\"978-3-031-73235-5\"\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Rombach_2022_CVPR,\n author = {Rombach, Robin and Blattmann, Andreas and Lorenz, Dominik and Esser, Patrick and Ommer, Bj\\\"orn},\n title = {High-Resolution Image Synthesis With Latent Diffusion Models},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n month = {June},\n year = {2022},\n pages = {10684-10695}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{peebles2023scalable,\n title={Scalable diffusion models with transformers},\n author={Peebles, William and Xie, Saining},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision},\n pages={4195--4205},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{wang20244ddress,\ntitle={4D-DRESS: A 4D Dataset of Real-world Human Clothing with Semantic Annotations},\nauthor={Wang, Wenbo and Ho, Hsuan-I and Guo, Chen and Rong, Boxiang and Grigorev, Artur and Song, Jie and Zarate, Juan Jose and Hilliges, Otmar},\nbooktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\nyear={2024}\n }\n\n@inproceedings{reloo,\n title={ReLoo: Reconstructing Humans Dressed in Loose Garments from Monocular Video in the Wild}, \n author={Guo, Chen and Jiang, Tianjian and Kaufmann, Manuel and Zheng, Chengwei and Valentin, Julien and Song, Jie and Hilliges, Otmar},\n booktitle={European conference on computer vision (ECCV)},\n year={2024},\n }\n\n@inproceedings{neus2,\ntitle={NeuS2: Fast Learning of Neural Implicit Surfaces for Multi-view Reconstruction}, \nauthor={Wang, Yiming and Han, Qin and Habermann, Marc and Daniilidis, Kostas and Theobalt, Christian and Liu, Lingjie},\nyear={2023},\nbooktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{chatziagapi2024migs,\n title={MIGS: Multi-Identity Gaussian Splatting via Tensor Decomposition},\n author={Aggelina Chatziagapi and Grigorios G. Chrysos and Dimitris Samaras},\n year={2024},\n booktitle={ECCV},\n}\n@inproceedings{chen2025taoavatar,\n title={Taoavatar: Real-time lifelike full-body talking avatars for augmented reality via 3d gaussian splatting},\n author={Chen, Jianchuan and Hu, Jingchuan and Wang, Gaige and Jiang, Zhonghua and Zhou, Tiansong and Chen, Zhiwen and Lv, Chengfei},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference},\n pages={10723--10734},\n year={2025}\n}\n@inproceedings{zheng2024gps,\n title={Gps-gaussian: Generalizable pixel-wise 3d gaussian splatting for real-time human novel view synthesis},\n author={Zheng, Shunyuan and Zhou, Boyao and Shao, Ruizhi and Liu, Boning and Zhang, Shengping and Nie, Liqiang and Liu, Yebin},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition},\n pages={19680--19690},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n\n\n\n@InProceedings{pmlr-v139-radford21a,\n title = \t {Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision},\n author = {Radford, Alec and Kim, Jong Wook and Hallacy, Chris and Ramesh, Aditya and Goh, Gabriel and Agarwal, Sandhini and Sastry, Girish and Askell, Amanda and Mishkin, Pamela and Clark, Jack and Krueger, Gretchen and Sutskever, Ilya},\n booktitle = \t {Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning},\n pages = \t {8748--8763},\n year = \t {2021},\n editor = \t {Meila, Marina and Zhang, Tong},\n volume = \t {139},\n series = \t {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research},\n month = \t {18--24 Jul},\n publisher = {PMLR},\n pdf = \t {http://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/radford21a/radford21a.pdf},\n url = \t {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/radford21a.html},\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zheng2022movq,\nauthor = {Zheng, Chuanxia and Vuong, Long Tung and Cai, Jianfei and Phung, Dinh},\ntitle = {MoVQ: modulating quantized vectors for high-fidelity image generation},\nyear = {2024},\nisbn = {9781713871088},\npublisher = {Curran Associates Inc.},\naddress = {Red Hook, NY, USA},\nbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems},\narticleno = {1701},\nnumpages = {14},\nlocation = {New Orleans, LA, USA},\nseries = {NIPS '22}\n}\n\n@InProceedings{Zhang_control,\n author = {Zhang, Lvmin and Rao, Anyi and Agrawala, Maneesh},\n title = {Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffusion Models},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)},\n month = {October},\n year = {2023},\n pages = {3836-3847}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{xue2024hsr,\n author={Xue, Lixin and Guo, Chen and Zheng, Chengwei and Wang, Fangjinhua and Jiang, Tianjian and Ho, Hsuan-I and Kaufmann, Manuel and Song, Jie and Hilliges Otmar},\n title={{HSR:} Holistic 3D Human-Scene Reconstruction from Monocular Videos},\n booktitle={European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)},\n year={2024}\n }\n\n@InProceedings{rong2021frankmocap,\n title={FrankMocap: A Monocular 3D Whole-Body Pose Estimation System via Regression and Integration},\n author={Rong, Yu and Shiratori, Takaaki and Joo, Hanbyul},\n booktitle={IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{shen2023xavatar,\n title={X-Avatar: Expressive Human Avatars},\n author={Shen, Kaiyue and Guo, Chen and Kaufmann, Manuel and Zarate, Juan and Valentin, Julien and Song, Jie and Hilliges, Otmar}, \n booktitle = {Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n year = {2023}\n }\n\n@inproceedings{yin2023hi4d,\n author = {Yin, Yifei and Guo, Chen and Kaufmann, Manuel and Zarate, Juan and Song, Jie and Hilliges, Otmar}, \n title = {Hi4D: 4D Instance Segmentation of Close Human Interaction}, \n booktitle = {Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n year = {2023}\n }\n@misc{simeoni2025dinov3,\n title={{DINOv3}},\n author={Sim{\\'e}oni, Oriane and Vo, Huy V. and Seitzer, Maximilian and Baldassarre, Federico and Oquab, Maxime and Jose, Cijo and Khalidov, Vasil and Szafraniec, Marc and Yi, Seungeun and Ramamonjisoa, Micha{\\\"e}l and Massa, Francisco and Haziza, Daniel and Wehrstedt, Luca and Wang, Jianyuan and Darcet, Timoth{\\'e}e and Moutakanni, Th{\\'e}o and Sentana, Leonel and Roberts, Claire and Vedaldi, Andrea and Tolan, Jamie and Brandt, John and Couprie, Camille and Mairal, Julien and J{\\'e}gou, Herv{\\'e} and Labatut, Patrick and Bojanowski, Piotr},\n year={2025},\n eprint={2508.10104},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10104},\n}\n\n\n\n### 2d\n@inproceedings{chan2019everybody,\n title={Everybody dance now},\n author={Chan, Caroline and Ginosar, Shiry and Zhou, Tinghui and Efros, Alexei A},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision},\n pages={5933--5942},\n year={2019}\n}\n@inproceedings{liu2019liquid,\n title={Liquid warping gan: A unified framework for human motion imitation, appearance transfer and novel view synthesis},\n author={Liu, Wen and Piao, Zhixin and Min, Jie and Luo, Wenhan and Ma, Lin and Gao, Shenghua},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision},\n pages={5904--5913},\n year={2019}\n}\n@inproceedings{zhang2022exploring,\n title={Exploring dual-task correlation for pose guided person image generation},\n author={Zhang, Pengze and Yang, Lingxiao and Lai, Jian-Huang and Xie, Xiaohua},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={7713--7722},\n year={2022}\n}\n@inproceedings{zhao2022thin,\n title={Thin-plate spline motion model for image animation},\n author={Zhao, Jian and Zhang, Hui},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition},\n pages={3657--3666},\n year={2022}\n}\n@inproceedings{siarohin2021motion,\n title={Motion representations for articulated animation},\n author={Siarohin, Aliaksandr and Woodford, Oliver J and Ren, Jian and Chai, Menglei and Tulyakov, Sergey},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition},\n pages={13653--13662},\n year={2021}\n}\n@article{siarohin2019first,\n title={First order motion model for image animation},\n author={Siarohin, Aliaksandr and Lathuili{\\`e}re, St{\\'e}phane and Tulyakov, Sergey and Ricci, Elisa and Sebe, Nicu},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={32},\n year={2019}\n}\n@inproceedings{yu2023bidirectionally,\n title={Bidirectionally deformable motion modulation for video-based human pose transfer},\n author={Yu, Wing-Yin and Po, Lai-Man and Cheung, Ray CC and Zhao, Yuzhi and Xue, Yu and Li, Kun},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision},\n pages={7502--7512},\n year={2023}\n}\n@article{ren2020deep,\n title={Deep spatial transformation for pose-guided person image generation and animation},\n author={Ren, Yurui and Li, Ge and Liu, Shan and Li, Thomas H},\n journal={IEEE Transactions on Image Processing},\n volume={29},\n pages={8622--8635},\n year={2020},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n@inproceedings{ma2024follow,\n title={Follow your pose: Pose-guided text-to-video generation using pose-free videos},\n author={Ma, Yue and He, Yingqing and Cun, Xiaodong and Wang, Xintao and Chen, Siran and Li, Xiu and Chen, Qifeng},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},\n volume={38},\n number={5},\n pages={4117--4125},\n year={2024}\n}\n@inproceedings{wang2024disco,\n title={Disco: Disentangled control for realistic human dance generation},\n author={Wang, Tan and Li, Linjie and Lin, Kevin and Zhai, Yuanhao and Lin, Chung-Ching and Yang, Zhengyuan and Zhang, Hanwang and Liu, Zicheng and Wang, Lijuan},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={9326--9336},\n year={2024}\n}\n@article{zhang2024mimicmotion,\n title={Mimicmotion: High-quality human motion video generation with confidence-aware pose guidance},\n author={Zhang, Yuang and Gu, Jiaxi and Wang, Li-Wen and Wang, Han and Cheng, Junqi and Zhu, Yuefeng and Zou, Fangyuan},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.19680},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n\n@article{martinez2024codec,\n author = {Julieta Martinez and Emily Kim and Javier Romero and Timur Bagautdinov and Shunsuke Saito and Shoou-I Yu and Stuart Anderson and Michael Zollh{\\\"o}fer and Te-Li Wang and Shaojie Bai and Chenghui Li and Shih-En Wei and Rohan Joshi and Wyatt Borsos and Tomas Simon and Jason Saragih and Paul Theodosis and Alexander Greene and Anjani Josyula and Silvio Mano Maeta and Andrew I. Jewett and Simon Venshtain and Christopher Heilman and Yueh-Tung Chen and Sidi Fu and Mohamed Ezzeldin A. Elshaer and Tingfang Du and Longhua Wu and Shen-Chi Chen and Kai Kang and Michael Wu and Youssef Emad and Steven Longay and Ashley Brewer and Hitesh Shah and James Booth and Taylor Koska and Kayla Haidle and Matt Andromalos and Joanna Hsu and Thomas Dauer and Peter Selednik and Tim Godisart and Scott Ardisson and Matthew Cipperly and Ben Humberston and Lon Farr and Bob Hansen and Peihong Guo and Dave Braun and Steven Krenn and He Wen and Lucas Evans and Natalia Fadeeva and Matthew Stewart and Gabriel Schwartz and Divam Gupta and Gyeongsik Moon and Kaiwen Guo and Yuan Dong and Yichen Xu and Takaaki Shiratori and Fabian Prada and Bernardo R. Pires and Bo Peng and Julia Buffalini and Autumn Trimble and Kevyn McPhail and Melissa Schoeller and Yaser Sheikh},\n title = {{Codec Avatar Studio: Paired Human Captures for Complete, Driveable, and Generalizable Avatars}},\n year = {2024},\n journal = {NeurIPS Track on Datasets and Benchmarks},\n}\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[runningheads]{llncs}\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Include basic ECCV package\n \n% TODO REVIEW: Insert your submission number below by replacing '*****'\n% TODO FINAL: Comment out the following line for the camera-ready version\n% \\usepackage[review,year=2026,ID=8030]{eccv}\n% TODO FINAL: Un-comment the following line for the camera-ready version\n\\usepackage{eccv}\n \n% OPTIONAL: Un-comment the following line for a version which is easier to read\n% on small portrait-orientation screens (e.g., mobile phones, or beside other windows)\n%\\usepackage[mobile]{eccv}\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Other packages\n\n% Commonly used abbreviations (\\eg, \\ie, \\etc, \\cf, \\etal, etc.)\n\\usepackage{eccvabbrv}\n\n% Include other packages here, before hyperref.\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{url}\n\\usepackage{epsfig}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{amssymb}\n\\usepackage{caption}\n\\usepackage{multirow}\n\\usepackage{url}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{xspace}\n\\usepackage{todonotes}\n\\usepackage{pifont}\n\\newenvironment{diff}{%\n %\\leavevmode\\color{blue}\\ignorespaces%\n}{%\n}%\n\\usepackage{wrapfig,lipsum,booktabs}\n% The \"axessiblity\" package can be found at: https://ctan.org/pkg/axessibility?lang=en\n\\usepackage[accsupp]{axessibility} % Improves PDF readability for those with disabilities.\n\\usepackage{makecell}\n\\usepackage{svg}\n\\usepackage{amsmath} %\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Hyperref package\n\n% It is strongly recommended to use hyperref, especially for the review version.\n% Please disable hyperref *only* if you encounter grave issues.\n% hyperref with option pagebackref eases the reviewers' job, but should be disabled for the final version.\n%\n% If you comment hyperref and then uncomment it, you should delete\n% main.aux before re-running LaTeX.\n% (Or just hit 'q' on the first LaTeX run, let it finish, and you\n% should be clear).\n\n% TODO REVIEW: Un-comment the following line for the review version\n% \\usepackage[pagebackref,breaklinks,colorlinks,citecolor=eccvblue]{hyperref}\n% TODO FINAL: Un-comment the following line for the camera-ready version\n\\usepackage[breaklinks,colorlinks,citecolor=eccvblue]{hyperref}\n% Support for ORCID icon\n\\usepackage{orcidlink}\n\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% TODO REVIEW: Replace with your title\n\\newcommand{\\methodname}{LUNA\\xspace}\n\\title{\\methodname: Learning Universal 3D Human Animation Beyond Skinning}\n\n\n% TODO REVIEW: If the paper title is too long for the running head, you can set\n% an abbreviated paper title here. If not, comment out.\n\\titlerunning{LUNA}\n\\author{Peng Li\\inst{1}\\thanks{Work was done during an internship at Meta.} \\and\nRawal Khirodkar\\inst{2} \\and\nJunxuan Li\\inst{2} \\and\nYuan Dong\\inst{2} \\and\nChen Cao\\inst{2} \\and\nYuan Liu\\inst{1} \\and\nWenhan Luo\\inst{1} \\and\nYike Guo\\inst{1} \\and\nShunsuke Saito\\inst{2}}\n\\authorrunning{P. Li et al.}\n\\institute{The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology \\and\nCodec Avatars Lab, Meta}\n\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\\begin{figure}\n\\vspace{-2em}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/teaser.png}\n \\vspace{-0.3in} \n \\captionof{figure}{\n Given a handful of human images, LUNA reconstructs a high-fidelity animatable 3D avatar, supporting versatile 2D control signals - including RGB images, 2D keypoints, hand-drawn sketches, and other unseen characters - without any additional preprocessing. Project page: \\url{https://penghtyx.github.io/LUNA/}.\n } \n \\label{fig:teaser}\n\\vspace{-0.2in} \n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{abstract}\n\\vspace{-0.2in} \n\\input{section/00_abstract}\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\\section{Introduction}\n\\input{section/01_intro}\n\n\\section{Related Work}\n\\input{section/02_related}\n\n\\section{Method}\n\\input{section/03_method}\n\n\\section{Experiments}\n\\input{section/04_exps}\n\n\\section{Conclusion}\n\\input{section/05_conclusion}\n\n% \\section*{Ethics Statement}\n% \\input{section/05_ethics}\n\n\\clearpage \n\n% \\section*{Acknowledgements}\n% Please insert your acknowledgments here.\n \n% ---- Bibliography ----\n%\n% BibTeX users should specify bibliography style 'splncs04'.\n% References will then be sorted and formatted in the correct style.\n%\n\\bibliographystyle{splncs04}\n\\bibliography{main}\n\n\n\\clearpage\n\\section{Appendix}\n\\input{section/06_appendix}\n\n\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: section/00_abstract.tex\n================================================\n\n\\vspace{-10pt}\n% % Creating photorealistic, animatable 3D human avatars from monocular inputs is along-standing and challenging problem. \n% Creating photorealistic, animatable 3D human avatars from monocular images still largely depends on Linear Blend Skinning (LBS) and parametric models. However, relying on low-dimensional parametric models restricts expressivity and fails to model complex, non-rigid dynamics while introducing unnatural motion jitter due to inevitable body-fitting errors.\n% % However, the parametric bottleneck strictly bounds the deformation space and discards rich 2D pixel information, leading to unnatural motion from inaccurate pose estimation and a noticeable loss of complex, non-rigid dynamics. \n% In this paper, we propose \\methodname, an LBS-free Universal Neural Animation framework that bypasses 3D body fitting constraints to directly map versatile 2D signals (e.g., RGB, keypoints, sketch and out-of-domain images) to 3D Gaussian deformations. At its core, \\methodname features a transformer-based motion regressor that separately models global rigid transformation and fine-grained local dynamics directly from 2D driving images. To resolve the geometric ambiguity inherent in 2D-to-3D lifting, we introduce a hybrid supervision strategy that distills soft structural priors from an LBS teacher, coupled with a balanced hybrid loss for scalable training across both limited body-fitting data and massive in-the-wild unlabeled video collections. Extensive experiments demonstrate that \\methodname achieves competitive visual fidelity compared to LBS-based approaches, while delivering jitter-free motion and strong zero-shot cross-identity generalization across diverse driving modalities. To the best of our knowledge, this marks the first end-to-end 2D-driving 3D human animation framework.\n\n\n\nCreating photorealistic, animatable 3D human avatars from monocular images still largely depends on Linear Blend Skinning (LBS) and parametric body models which constrain expressivity and often introduce artifacts due to imperfect fitting. We propose \\methodname, an LBS-free universal neural animation model that directly maps multiple 2D controls like images, keypoints, sketch and unseen characters into 3D Gaussian deformations, bypassing explicit body fitting. \nAt its core, a transformer-based motion regressor disentangles global rigid motion from fine-grained local dynamics to capture both coherent movement and subtle non-rigid effects. To resolve the inherent ambiguity of 2D-to-3D lifting while scaling beyond fitted datasets, we introduce hybrid supervision that distills soft structural priors from an LBS teacher and a loss that supports training on both limited fitted data and large in-the-wild unlabeled videos. Extensive experiments show \\methodname achieves competitive visual fidelity compared to LBS-based approaches, while delivering realistic human motion and zero-shot cross-identity generalization across diverse driving modalities. To the best of our knowledge, \\methodname is the first end-to-end 3D animatable model that supports implicit 2D driving.\n\n\\keywords{3D Gaussian Avatars, Implicit Control, Photorealism, Animation, 3D Reconstruction, Large-Scale Supervision\n}\n\n\n\n% Extensive experiments demonstrate that LUNA significantly reduces pose-induced jitter and captures expressive surface dynamics. Notably, our learned neural deformation field exhibits strong zero-shot cross-identity generalization across heterogeneous driving modalities, paving the way for a more robust and flexible paradigm in 3D human animation.\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: section/01_intro.tex\n================================================\n\\label{sec:intro}\n\nCreating photorealistic, fully animatable 3D human avatars from monocular inputs has long stood as a central ambition at the intersection of computer vision and graphics, driven by immense demand in film production, interactive entertainment, and VR/AR. Traditional methods~\\cite{bagautdinov2021driving, li2024animatable} can deliver high fidelity, but they typically depend on costly multi-view capture and iterative optimization, confining scalability to controlled studio settings. In contrast, most monocular animation systems heavily rely on predefined parametric body models~\\cite{loper2015smpl,smplx:2019,MHR:2025}, a convenient prior that nonetheless constrains expressiveness and often compromises photorealism under complex, highly dynamic motion. \n\n\\vspace{1mm}\\noindent\nLarge Reconstruction Models (LRMs)~\\cite{hong2023lrm} have recently demonstrated striking generalization in 3D reconstruction, enabled by scalable transformer architectures and large datasets. Following this, several methods~\\cite{qiu2025lhm, zhuang2024idol, guo2025vid2avatar} predict canonical 3D Gaussians in a feed-forward manner while incorporating parametric priors for animatability. Despite their efficiency and generalization, the continued dependence on parametric models creates a persistent representation bottleneck. First, during training, these methods commonly use Linear Blend Skinning (LBS) to map a learnable canonical representation into posed space for rendering supervision. Consequently, inevitable body fitting errors lead to suboptimal canonical learning. Second, at inference, monocular 3D pose estimation is inherently ill-posed, and small joint errors can readily amplify into temporal jitter or geometric artifacts in the rendered avatar. \n\n\\vspace{1mm}\\noindent\nIn this paper, we introduce \\textbf{LUNA}, an LBS-free Neural Animation model that enables direct 3D animation from flexible 2D driving signals, including RGB images, sketches, and 2D keypoints. The central idea is to remove the parametric-body-bottleneck by learning a direct 2D-to-3D deformation mapping. Concretely, we propose a transformer based \\emph{disentangled neural animator} that predicts deformations in two parts: a global rigid motion that accounds for coarse pose and camera-aligned movement, and a local non-rigid field that captured pose-dependent dynamics at the level of individual Gaussians. By leveraging the long-range context of our model, \\methodname extracts motion cues from the 2D input and translates them into per-Gaussian deformations. Our end-to-end setup allows the model to handle large articulated motion while preserving fine-grained, non-rigid effects that are difficult to express with LBS.\n\n\\vspace{1mm}\\noindent\nDirectly learning 3D deformation from 2D inputs using only rendering supervision, however, is severly underconstrained: without an explicit notion of human shape, reconstructions can collapse into flattened configurations, see Fig.~\\ref{fig:abla_distill_mvfinetuning}. We therefore introduce a hybrid supervision strategy. While \\methodname is designed to surpass the limitations of LBS, we retain its utility as a \\emph{soft} structural prior. Concretely, we utilize an LBS-based teacher model not as a hard driver, but as a regularizer that distills structural cues into the student. Combined with photometric rendering losses, this distillation preserves geometric integrity without inheriting the teacher's representational limits. Finally, to scale beyond scarce body-tracked data, we use a loss reweighting scheme that dynamically balances rendering and distillation objectives based on the proportion of labeled data within each batch. This enables our model to scale efficiently from limited annotated samples to massive, unlabeled in-the-wild video collections.\n\n\\vspace{1mm}\\noindent\nA notable outcome of this formulation is the emergence of \\textbf{cross-identity driving}. Although trained with matched source and driving identities, \\methodname learns a deformation field that captures universal humanoid kinematics. At inference, it can be driven across identities implicitly by heterogeneous modalities - keypoints, sketches, or out-of-domain character images—without further tuning. Our results demonstrate that implicit driving using \\methodname drastically reduces pose-induced jitter and better captures non-rigid dynamics than parametric baselines. Our contributions are summarized as follows:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item To the best of our knowledge, \\methodname is the first model to enable universal 3D human animation directly driven by versatile 2D signals, establishing a new paradigm that bypasses explicit 3D control.\n\n \\vspace{1mm}\n \\item We propose a body-fitting-free animation setup that extracts motion semantics directly from 2D inputs without any preprocessing~(e.g., body fitting or foreground segmentation), thereby reducing error accumulation and significantly mitigating temporal jitter.\n\n \\vspace{1mm}\n \\item We introduce a disentangled neural animator with a fully LBS-free decoder, enabling direct modeling of pose-dependent deformations from coarse articulations to complex non-rigid dynamics such as loose clothing, beyond the rigid constraints of template-based approaches.\n\n\n\\end{itemize}\n\n \n\n================================================\nFILE: section/02_related.tex\n================================================\n\\label{sec:related_work}\n\n% \\textbf{Fitting-based 3D Avatar Reconstruction.} \n% mv video -> monocular video, nerf ->gs\n% High-fidelity 3D avatar reconstruction has traditionally relied on multi-view calibrated systems to capture subjects in a canonical space~\\cite{liu2021neural, bagautdinov2021driving, remelli2022drivable, peng2021neural, habermann2021,peng2021animatable,xu2022sanerf,HVTR:3DV2022, 2021narf, li2022tava, zhang2021stnerf, ARAH:ECCV:2022, chen2024meshavatar, saito2024rgca, zheng2023avatarrex, li2023posevocab, 10.1145/3697140, shen2023xavatar, chen2025taoavatar}. Early efforts utilized neural implicit representations such as NeRF~\\cite{mildenhall2020nerf, yariv2021volume} to model geometry and appearance, but these methods required time-consuming per-avatar optimization~\\cite{peng2021animatable, xu2022sanerf, zhang2021stnerf, ARAH:ECCV:2022}. Recently, the integration of 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS)~\\cite{kerbl3Dgaussians} has revolutionized this field, enabling real-time rendering and much faster convergence for person-specific avatars~\\cite{li2024animatablegaussians, zielonka2023drivable3dgaussianavatars, moreau2024human, Pang_2024_CVPR, jung2023deformable3dgaussiansplatting}. For monocular video inputs, representative works~\\cite{weng2022humannerf, guo2023vid2avatar, moon2024exavatar} integrate template body priors (such as SMPL~\\cite{smplx:2019}) as a canonical representation and optimize a deformation field to warp the avatar into the target pose space. Despite achieving high geometric fidelity, these optimization-based approaches are inherently subject-specific and lack the ability to generalize to unseen identities.\n\n% \\noindent\\textbf{Feed-forward 3D Avatar Reconstruction.}\n% single view -> mv or generative -> large aniamtbale model\n% To overcome the limitations of per-subject optimization, feed-forward methods are designed to reconstruct 3D avatars instantly or via highly efficient optimization. These can be broadly categorized into static and animatable reconstructions. For static reconstruction, early regression-based efforts utilized pixel-aligned features to infer 3D surfaces or Gaussians from a single view~\\cite{saito2019pifu, saito2020pifuhd, xiu2022icon, alldieck2022phorhum, xiu2023econ, huang2020arch, he2021arch++, zheng2021pamir}. However, they often suffer from poor texture quality and geometric artifacts due to limited training data scales and severe self-occlusions. Another line of research focuses on sparse-view~\\cite{tao2021function4d, zheng2023learning, zheng2024gpsgaussian, kwon2024ghg, Zhao_2022_CVPR, Chen_2023_CVPR, chen2022gpnerf} or novel-view derived from generative model~\\cite{ho2024sith, li2024pshuman, chen2025synchuman} to synthesize plausible and high-fidelity avatar. While impressive static details, they tend to produce unrealistic artifacts during animation due to the absence of dynamic motion priors. Driven by the success of large-scale datasets, recent animatable feed-forward works~\\cite{zhuang2024idol, qiu2025lhm, guo2023vid2avatar} leverage scalable transformers to encode subjects into structured latent spaces, enabling instant animatable avatar reconstruction and showing promising generalization capability. Our work builds upon these generalizable backbones but significantly extends their capability from static reconstruction to LBS-free, universal signal-driving animation.\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{3D Avatar Reconstruction.} High-fidelity 3D avatar reconstruction has traditionally relied on multi-view calibrated systems to capture subjects in a canonical space~\\cite{liu2021neural, bagautdinov2021driving, remelli2022drivable, peng2021neural, habermann2021, peng2021animatable, xu2022sanerf, HVTR:3DV2022, 2021narf, li2022tava, zhang2021stnerf, ARAH:ECCV:2022, chen2024meshavatar, saito2024rgca, zheng2023avatarrex, li2023posevocab, 10.1145/3697140, shen2023xavatar, chen2025taoavatar}. Early efforts utilized neural implicit representations such as NeRF~\\cite{mildenhall2020nerf, yariv2021volume} to model geometry and appearance, but required time-consuming per-avatar optimization~\\cite{peng2021animatable, xu2022sanerf, zhang2021stnerf, ARAH:ECCV:2022}. Recently, the integration of 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS)~\\cite{kerbl3Dgaussians} has significantly accelerated this process, enabling real-time rendering and faster convergence for person-specific avatars~\\cite{li2024animatablegaussians, zielonka2023drivable3dgaussianavatars, moreau2024human, Pang_2024_CVPR, jung2023deformable3dgaussiansplatting}. While these methods can achieve high fidelity by integrating body priors~\\cite{smplx:2019, weng2022humannerf, guo2023vid2avatar, moon2024exavatar}, they remain inherently subject-specific and fail to generalize to unseen identities. \n\n\\vspace{1mm}\\noindent\nTo overcome these limitations, feed-forward methods are designed to reconstruct avatars instantly. For static reconstruction, early regression-based efforts utilized pixel-aligned features to infer 3D surfaces or Gaussians from a single view~\\cite{saito2019pifu, saito2020pifuhd, xiu2022icon, alldieck2022phorhum, xiu2023econ, huang2020arch, he2021arch++, zheng2021pamir}. However, they often suffer from texture artifacts and self-occlusions. Another line of research leverages sparse-view~\\cite{tao2021function4d, zheng2023learning, zheng2024gpsgaussian, kwon2024ghg, Zhao_2022_CVPR, Chen_2023_CVPR, chen2022gpnerf} or novel-view synthesis from generative models~\\cite{ho2024sith, li2024pshuman, chen2025synchuman} to achieve high-fidelity results. While impressive, these static reconstructions often lack dynamic motion priors, leading to unrealistic artifacts during animation. Driven by large-scale datasets, recent animatable feed-forward works~\\cite{zhuang2024idol, qiu2025lhm, guo2023vid2avatar} leverage scalable transformers to encode subjects into structured latent spaces, showing promising generalization capability. Our work builds upon these generalizable backbones but significantly extends their capability from static reconstruction to LBS-free, universal implicit animation.\n\n\\vspace{2mm}\n\\noindent\\textbf{3D Avatar Animation.}\nConventional 3D aniamtion predominantly rely on LBS tied to parametric models like SMPL~\\cite{loper2015smpl, SMPL-X:2019}. To model non-rigid dynamics such as loose garments, recent works augment the LBS prior with pose-dependent Gaussian mapping or neural deformation fields~\\cite{li2024animatablegaussians, li2024gaussianbodyclothedhumanreconstruction, chen2025taoavatar, qiu2025lhm}. AniGS~\\cite{qiu2024AniGS} further studies animatable Gaussian avatars from a single image, but still relies on a human-prior-driven animation pipeline. However, this tight coupling with the SMPL topology makes these methods highly sensitive to pose estimation errors and restricts them to standard humanoid structures. Although some attempts, such as TAVA~\\cite{li2022tava} and GART~\\cite{lei2023gart}, relax these constraints via skeleton-based deformations, they still necessitate person-specific multi-view fitting. Recent feed-forward reconstruction models such as PF-LHM~\\cite{qiu2025pflhm} improve pose-free avatar reconstruction from casually captured images. Most recently, HumanRAM~\\cite{yu2025humanram} introduced an implicit animator for feed-forward 2D reposing, but it lacks a cohesive 3D representation and remains bottlenecked by human template priors. \n\n\\vspace{2mm}\n\\noindent\\textbf{2D Human Animation.} 2D Human animation aims to generate novel-pose images from one or more reference images. Early works~\\cite{chan2019everybody, liu2019liquid, zhao2022thin} primarily formulated this task as signal-driven image-to-image translation. Recently, diffusion-based methods~\\cite{hu2024animate, zhang2024mimicmotion, zhu2024champ, xu2024magicanimate, wang2024disco, shao2024human4dit} have achieved remarkable success by leveraging the powerful generative priors of 2D diffusion models. While these methods exhibit impressive versatility in handling diverse driving signals (e.g., poses, depth, or edges), they are inherently restricted on 2D image plane, often suffering from temporal flickering, view inconsistency, and a lack of true 3D geometric control, while the iterative denoising process remains computationally expensive. \n\n\\vspace{1mm}\\noindent\nIn contrast to the existing 2D or 3D works, we are the first to bridge the gap between the versatility of 2D driving signal and the structural integrity of 3D modeling. Our proposed LUNA is a fully LBS-free framework that completely discards template dependency and efficiently maps 2D driving signals to 3D avatar motion. \nOur method not only captures complex non-rigid dynamics with superior flexibility but also achieves robust cross-modality generalization that previous 3D animators could not reach.\n% Unlike all previous approaches, we propose a fully LBS-free neural animation framework that completely discards template dependency. By directly mapping diverse 2D driving signals to 3D Gaussian offsets, our method achieves superior flexibility in capturing complex non-rigid dynamics and unlocks highly robust cross-modality animation generalization.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: section/03_method.tex\n================================================\n\\label{sec:method}\n\n\\begin{figure}[ht]\n \\centering \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/pipeline.png}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Overview}. Given $N$ unposed multi-view identity images and a 2D driving signal, \\methodname first reconstructs canonical 3D Gaussians with an \\textit{Identity Encoder}. A transformer-based \\textit{Implicit Neural Animator} then maps them to posed space conditioned on the driving signal. During training, the driving image is randomly sampled across modalities (RGB, keypoints or sketches). }\n \\label{fig:pipeline}\n\\end{figure}\n\nGiven a sparse set of unposed identity images $I_{id} = \\{I_{i}\\}_{i=1}^N$ and a single 2D driving image $I_d$, our goal is to synthesize a high-fidelity 3D human avatar that can be animated by $I_d$ end-to-end manner. As shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:pipeline}, \\methodname has two components: an \\textit{Identity Encoder} (Sec.~\\ref{sec:canonical_rep}) that lifts the input into a canonical set of 3D Gaussian, and an \\textit{Implicit Neural Animator} (Sec.~\\ref{subsec:animator}) that predicts disentangled deformations and attribute residuals to pose the avatar. The model is trained with a hybrid supervision strategy (Sec.~\\ref{subsec:loss}). Although $I_{id}$ and $I_d$ share the same identity during training, our modelgeneralizes to cross-identity driving at inference. \n\n\\subsection{Canonical Identity Encoder}\n\\label{sec:canonical_rep}\nInspired by feed-forward human reconstruction model~\\cite{qiu2025lhm}, we design an Identity Encoder that lifts the reference images $I_{id}$ into canonical 3D Gaussians, together with semantic features that condition the subsequent driving.\n\n\\vspace{2mm}\n\\noindent \\textbf{Semantic Query Tokens.} To inject human-centric structural priors, we anchor our canonical avatar to a template topology. Specifically, we define $K$ learnable query tokens, each associated with a vertex of the template mesh. To encode anatomical semantics, each token is augmented with a learnable positional embedding $Q \\in \\mathbb{R}^{K \\times C}$ and a semantic label embedding $E_{sem} \\in \\mathbb{R}^{K \\times C}$. The resulting 3D query tokens are formulated as $T_{gs} = Q + E_{sem}$, where $C$ denotes the feature dimension. This design encourages a consistent correspondence between semantic parts and Gaussian primitives, improving identity stability under large pose and viewpoint changes.\n\n\\vspace{2mm}\n\\noindent \\textbf{Image Tokenization.} In parallel, we extract fine-grained identity features from the multi-view inputs $I_{id}$. We use a pre-trained Sapiens~\\cite{khirodkar2024sapiens} encoder to tokenize each view into patch features, and then aggregate them across views to obtain identity image tokens $T_{img} \\in \\mathbb{R}^{M \\times C}$, where $M$ is the number of image tokens. Following~\\cite{qiu2025lhm}, we include both body tokens and face tokens in $T_{img}$. \n\n\\vspace{2mm}\n\\noindent \\textbf{Joint Feature Fusion and Canonical Decoding.} \nTo lift the 2D observations into a unified 3D canonical representation, we fuse the 3D query tokens $T_{gs}$ with the image tokens $T_{img}$ using Multimodal Transformer (MM-Transformer)~\\cite{esser2024scaling} blocks. Following~\\cite{qiu2025lhm}, each block contains intra-modal self-attention and cross-modal attention to enable cross-modal feature exchange. After $L$ blocks, we obtain canonical identity tokens $T_{can}$, which are decoded by a lightweight MLP into canonical Gaussians ${G}_{can}$. Each Gaussian primitive is parameterized as:\n\\begin{equation}\ng = \\{\\mu, q, s, \\alpha, c\\}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mu \\in \\mathbb{R}^3$ is the center, $q \\in \\mathbb{R}^4$ is the rotation quaternion, $s \\in \\mathbb{R}^3$ is the scale, $\\alpha \\in \\mathbb{R}$ is the opacity, and $c$ is the color. Gaussians $G_{can}$ and tokens $T_{can}$ are then passed to the Implicit Neural Animator.\n\n\\subsection{Implicit Neural Animator}\n\\label{subsec:animator}\n\nThe Implicit Neural Animator maps the canonical avatar to posed space conditioned on a 2D driving signal $I_d$. To stabilize learning and improve expressiveness, \\methodname disentangles motion into a global rigid transformation and local, per-Gaussian deformations, both predicted in a purely feed-forward manner.\n\n\\vspace{2mm}\n\\noindent \\textbf{Motion Tokenization.} We extract motion cues from $I_d$ using a pre-trained DINOv3~\\cite{simeoni2025dinov3} encoder, producing motion tokens $T_{motion}$. We choose DINOv3 over Sapiens for two reasons: (i) animation primarily depends on kinematic layout rather than fine-grained identity or texture, and (ii) DINOv3 generalizes better to out-of-domain, non-photorealistic driving signals such as 2D keypoints and abstract sketches. \n\n\n\\vspace{2mm}\n\\noindent \\textbf{Global Transformation Prediction.} We model the avatar’s coarse spatial alignment with a global rotation $R$ and translation $T$. We first aggregate the DINOv3 motion tokens into a global descriptor and feed it to two lightweight MLP heads. Directly regressing Euler angles is unstable due to discontinuities at $\\pm\\pi$, so we predict rotation in a continuous trigonometric form. Specifically, for each axis $i \\in \\{x,y,z\\}$, the rotation head outputs a 2D vector, \n\\begin{equation}\n(s_i, c_i) = \\text{Tanh} (\\text{MLP}_{rot}(T_{motion})) \n\\end{equation}\nwhich is normalized and then composed into a valid rotation matrix $R \\in \\mathbb{R}^{3\\times3}$. For translation, regressing absolute coordinates can exhibit scale drift. Instead, we predict a normalized offset $\\hat{t}$ and recover translation via dataset denormalization:\n\\begin{equation} \nT = \\sigma_T \\cdot \\hat{t} + \\mu_T, \\hat{t}=\\text{Tanh} (\\text{MLP}_{trans}(T_{motion}))\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mu_T$ and $\\sigma_T$ are the mean and standard deviation computed from the training data distribution.\n\n\\vspace{1mm}\n\\noindent \\textbf{Deformed Avatar Gaussian.} Global $R$ and $T$ provide coarse alignment, while local deformations capture the coupling of articulated motion and non-rigid dynamics. We first project the canonical tokens $T_{can}$ to a lower-dimensional latent and concatenate them with learnable motion queries $Q_{motion} \\in \\mathbb{R}^{K \\times (C/2)}$ to form identity queries:\n\\begin{equation}\nT_{id}=\\text{MLP}_{proj}(T_{can}) \\parallel Q_{motion}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\parallel$ denotes channel-wise concatenation. We fuse $T_{id}$ with the motion tokens $T_{motion}$ using the MM-Transformer, and decode per-Gaussian residuals with a lightweight MLP: position offset $\\Delta\\mu$, rotation residual $\\Delta q$, and color residual $\\Delta c$. For stability, we keep scale $s$ and opacity $\\alpha$ fixed during animation. The posed Gaussians are:\n\\begin{equation}\ng_{posed}=\\{\\mu_p, q_p, s, \\alpha, c_p\\}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mu_p = R(\\mu+\\Delta\\mu)+T$, $q_p = q_R \\otimes \\Delta q \\otimes q$, and $c_p = c + \\Delta c$. Here $\\otimes$ denotes quaternion multiplication and $q_R$ is the quaternion corresponding to the global rotation $R$.\n\n\n\\subsection{Hybrid Supervision Strategy}\n\\label{subsec:loss}\nOur training corpus mixes samples with parametric body-fitting annotations and large-scale unannotated videos. We first train the Identity Encoder on labeled data by extending LHM to a multi-view setting (MV-LHM), and then train the Neural Animator using both labeled and unlabeled data. Concretely, we sample the two data types within each mini-batch and optimize a balanced hybrid objective for stable training.\n\n\\vspace{2mm}\n\\noindent \\textbf{Photometric Rendering Loss.} For all samples, we rasterize the posed 3D Gaussians into an image $I_{render}$ and enforce photometric consistency with the driving frame $I_d$:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\mathcal{L}_{render} = \\mathcal{L}_1+\\mathcal{L}_{mask} + \\mathcal{L}_{LPIPS}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mathcal{L}_1$ is the pixel-wise $L_1$ loss, $\\mathcal{L}_{mask}$ is the foreground mask loss, and $\\mathcal{L}_{LPIPS}$ is the perceptual loss.\n\n\\vspace{2mm}\n\\noindent \\textbf{LBS Distillation Regularization.} For samples with parametric pose labels, we use an LBS-based teacher to provide soft structural targets. The teacher produces pseudo attributes for posed Gaussians, including positions $\\hat{\\mu}$, rotations $\\hat{q}$, and colors $\\hat{c}$. We guide the animation transformer with the distillation loss:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\mathcal{L}_{distill} = \\|\\mu_p - \\hat{\\mu}\\|_1 + \\lambda_{q} \\mathcal{L}_{rot}(q_p, \\hat{q}) + \\lambda_{c} \\|c_p - \\hat{c}\\|_1\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mathcal{L}_{rot}$ denotes the cosine distance between quaternions.\n\n\\vspace{2mm}\n\\noindent \\textbf{Projection Loss for Transformation.} A natural strategy is to supervise the predicted global rotation and translation on the annotated subset and rely on photometric rendering to generalize to unlabeled data. In practice, direct supervision is stable for rotation, so we supervise $R$ via its representation:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\mathcal{L}_{R} = \\|(s, c) - (\\hat{s}, \\hat{c})\\|_1\n\\end{equation}\nHowever, for translation $T$, even marginal estimation errors (especially along the depth axis) can induce severe spatial misalignment, thus dominating the loss gradients and destabilizing the training. We therefore avoid direct 3D supervision on $T$ and instead impose a 2D reprojection loss on posed Gaussian centers:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\mathcal{L}_{proj} = \\frac{1}{K} \\sum_{i=1}^{K} \\left\\| \\Pi(\\mu_p^i) - \\hat{u}^i \\right\\|_1 \n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\Pi(\\cdot)$ represents the camera projection.\n\n\n\\vspace{2mm}\n\\noindent \\textbf{Balanced Hybrid Optimization.} \nWhen mixing labeled and unlabeled data, photometric gradients from the unlabeled majority can overwhelm the structural signal, leading to geometric collapse (see Fig.~\\ref{fig:abla_distill_mvfinetuning}). To maintain gradient balance, we form mini-batches with a fixed labeled-to-unlabeled ratio (e.g., $1{:}5$) and upweight the distillation term:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\mathcal{L}_{total} = \\mathcal{L}_{render} + \\mathcal{L}_{R} + \\mathcal{L}_{proj} + \\lambda_{distill} \\cdot \\mathcal{L}_{distill}\n\\end{equation}\nWe set $\\lambda_{distill}$ inversely proportional to the labeled fraction (e.g., $\\lambda_{distill}=5$ for $1{:}5$), preventing the structural gradients from being diluted. This simple reweighting enables learning fine non-rigid details from large-scale unlabeled videos while retaining LBS-anchored geometric stability.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: section/04_exps.tex\n================================================\n\\label{sec:experiments}\n% \\subsection{implementation details}\n\n\\subsection{Implementation Details}\n\n\\noindent \\textbf{Data.} \nOur training corpus integrates four distinct data sources to ensure robust generalization across diverse identities and poses.\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item \\textbf{Video35K}: 35,000 in-the-wild full-body video clips, uniformly sampling 60 frames per clip. Video35K was not collected from a third-party data provider under a licensing agreement that permits machine learning research and publication, and is curated from the same source as the Sapiens pre-training data~\\cite{khirodkar2024sapiens}. \n% Body parameters are extracted via SAM-3D-body~\\cite{yang2026sam3dbody}. To mitigate depth ambiguity during global translation prediction, we normalize the camera parameters by fixing the focal length to $f=20,000$, setting the principal point to the image center, and re-tracking the pose translation.\n\\vspace{1mm}\n\n\\item \\textbf{iPhone1K}: 1,100 monocular videos captured by iPhone, featuring subjects performing basic turn-around motions. It is a proprietary dataset collected onsite by our team and collaborators, following the phone-scan capture setting used in URAvatar~\\cite{li2024uravatar}. All participants provided written informed consent covering the use of their data for machine learning research and publication. We select 1,000 identities and uniformly sample 32 frames per identity for training.\n\\vspace{1mm}\n\n\\item \\textbf{Cloth10K}: To explicitly model complex non-rigid dynamics, we curate 10,000 identities with complex garments and reserve 100 distinct clips for evaluation. Cloth10K is a derivative dataset constructed by us from Video35K using a conditional video generation model, and is used under the same applicable licensing terms.\n% The driving signals are sampled from studio-captured motion sequences and used to animate the identities with conditioned video models. \n\\vspace{1mm}\n\\item \\textbf{Dome}: A multi-view dataset of 900 identities captured in a 3D studio with 200 synchronized cameras. It is a proprietary onsite capture dataset collected by our team and collaborators, and follows the same type of studio capture source as Ava-256~\\cite{martinez2024codec}. All participants provided written informed consent covering the use of their data for machine learning research and publication. We uniformly sample 200 frames per identity from the original $\\sim$2,000-frame casual motion sequences for training.\n\\end{itemize}\nIn total, the training dataset includes over 36,000 identities and 3.7M frames.\n\n\\vspace{2mm}\n\\noindent \\textbf{Evaluation.} We evaluate self-reenactment and animation quality on the 100 Cloth10K clips and 100 iPhone sequences. We also benchmark on the widely used NeuMan~\\cite{jiang2022neuman} dataset, which was obtained from its official public release and used following the protocol described by its authors. For optimization-based baselines (Vid2Avatar~\\cite{guo2023vid2avatar}, ExAvatar~\\cite{moon2024exavatar}), we strictly follow the official frame splits for training. For feed-forward methods, we uniformly select one or four views from the training splits as reference input. All methods are evaluated on the official test splits. We further quantitatively evaluate cross-identity driving on NeuMan.\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/pose_results.png}\n \\footnotesize\\leftline{~~~~~~Driver~\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad~~~Posed 3D Human~}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Our results with diverse 2D driving signals}, including sketch image, color image, 2D keypoint and other out-of-domain images.}\n \\label{fig:our_results}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering \n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=0.8\\linewidth]{figures/compare_loose_cloth.png}\n \\footnotesize\\leftline{Reference~\\qquad~~IDOL~\\cite{zhuang2024idol}~\\qquad~~LHM~\\cite{qiu2025lhm}~~\\qquad\\qquad~~MV-LHM~~~\\qquad\\quad~~~~Ours~~}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Qualitative comparisons on Cloth10K.} LBS-dependent approach (IDOL and LHM) suffer from severe ID shift ot structural tearing. In contrast, \\methodname preserves the structural integrity and continuous topology of the fabric.}\n \\label{fig:loose_cloth}\n % \\vspace{-0.3in}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\vspace{2mm}\n\\noindent \\textbf{Baselines and Metrics.} We compare against monocular optimization methods (Vid2Avatar~\\cite{guo2023vid2avatar}, ExAvatar~\\cite{moon2024exavatar}) and recent feed-forward models (IDOL~\\cite{zhuang2024idol}, LHM~\\cite{qiu2025lhm}, UP2YOU~\\cite{cai2025up2you}). We also include our extended MV-LHM to benchmark multi-view inputs. Photometric quality is measured via PSNR, L1 error, and LPIPS. To quantify motion stability and temporal plausibility, we employ Mean Acceleration Error~(MAE)~\\cite{Kanazawa_2019_CVPR} and Mean Squared Jerk (MSJ)~\\cite{du2023agrol}. MAE evaluates the second-order temporal derivative of 3D Gaussian trajectories, reflecting overall motion stability:\n\n\\begin{equation}\nE_{acc} = \\frac{1}{N (T - 2)} \\sum_{i=1}^{N} \\sum_{t=2}^{T-1} \\left\\| \\frac{\\mathbf{x}_{i,t+1} - 2\\mathbf{x}_{i,t} + \\mathbf{x}_{i,t-1}}{\\Delta t^2} \\right\\| \n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mathbf{x}_{i,t}$ denotes the 3D position of the $i$-th Gaussian at frame $t$, and $\\Delta t$ is the time interval. MSJ measures the third-order derivative, serving as a highly sensitive indicator for high-frequency \"jittering\" artifacts,\n\n\\begin{equation}\nE_{jerk} = \\frac{1}{N (T - 3)} \\sum_{i=1}^{N} \\sum_{t=3}^{T-1} \\left\\| \\frac{\\mathbf{x}_{i,t+1} - 3\\mathbf{x}_{i,t} + 3\\mathbf{x}_{i,t-1} - \\mathbf{x}_{i,t-2}}{\\Delta t^3} \\right\\|^2 \n\\end{equation}\nLower values for both metrics indicate smoother, physically coherent animations.\n\n\n\n\\vspace{2mm}\n\\noindent \\textbf{Hyperparameters.} The Identity Encoder is initialized from our MV-LHM, pre-trained on $\\sim$1M pose-annotated videos (details in Appendix). The Neural Animator is trained in two progressive stages. \nAt Stage 1 (monocular pre-training), the model is trained on Video34K, iPhone1K, and the Cloth10K training split using 64 A100 GPUs (batch size 64) for 30K iterations with a learning rate of $4 \\times 10^{-4}$. The training begins with a 1,000-iteration warmup supervised only by the global rotation and projection loss ($\\mathcal{L}_R + \\mathcal{L}_{proj}$), after which the full objective $\\mathcal{L}_{total}$ is applied. At stage 2, we fine-tune the model on the Dome dataset using 16 A100 GPUs for 30K iterations with a decayed learning rate of $1 \\times 10^{-4}$. \n% The multiview finetuning helps enhance 3D consistency of the animated avatar and allow model to produce more compact Gaussians. \nThe hyper-parameters are set to $\\lambda_q=\\lambda_c=0.5$, $K=8192$, $C=1024$, $N=4$. We employ MHR~\\cite{MHR:2025} as body template in our experiments.\n\n\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\caption{\\textbf{Quantitative comparisons of reconstruction quality.} We evaluate \\methodname on our collected Cloth10K~(focusing on non-rigid garments) and the public NeuMan~\\cite{jiang2022neuman} dataset. Bold indicates the best performance, and $\\ast$ denotes our implementation for multiview inputs.}\n\\label{tab:main_comparison}\n% \\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{\n\\begin{tabular}{c l ccc ccc}\n\\toprule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Type}} & \\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Method}} & \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\textbf{Cloth10K~ (Non-rigid)}} & \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\textbf{NeuMan }} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){3-5} \\cmidrule(lr){6-8}\n& & PSNR$\\uparrow$ & L1$\\downarrow$ & LPIPS$\\downarrow$ & PSNR$\\uparrow$ & L1$\\downarrow$ & LPIPS$\\downarrow$ \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{Optim. based} \n& Vid2Avatar~\\cite{guo2023vid2avatar} &18.971. &0.042 &0.157 &26.853 & 0.012 & 0.017 \\\\\n& ExAvatar~\\cite{moon2024exavatar} &19.533. &0.041 &0.153 &\\textbf{31.270} & \\textbf{0.009} & \\textbf{0.009} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{5}{*}{Feed-forward} \n& IDOL~\\cite{zhuang2024idol} &17.430 &0.067 &0.213 & 24.700 & 0.037 & 0.051 \\\\\n& LHM~\\cite{qiu2025lhm} &19.201 &0.047 &0.167 & 25.310 & 0.029 & 0.039 \\\\\n& UP2YOU~\\cite{cai2025up2you} &19.745. &0.047 &0.149 & 25.492 & 0.026 & 0.041 \\\\\n& MV-LHM$^\\ast$ & 20.124 & 0.038 & 0.158 & 26.832 & 0.017 & 0.023\\\\\n\\cmidrule{2-8}\n& \\textbf{\\methodname (Ours)} & \\textbf{22.072} & \\textbf{0.027} & \\textbf{0.131} & 26.819 & 0.015 & 0.023 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n% }\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\caption{\\textbf{Quantitative evaluation of cross-identity driving on NeuMan.} For Cross-ID, we animate 10 curated in-the-wild identity images with NeuMan motions and use the generated videos as driving signals. The right subtable reports 2D keypoint error extracted by Sapiens and normalized by the person bounding box.}\n\\label{tab:cross_id_keypoint}\n\\begin{minipage}{0.48\\linewidth}\n\\centering\n\\footnotesize\n\\begin{tabular}{lccc}\n\\toprule\nMethod & PSNR$\\uparrow$ & L1$\\downarrow$ & LPIPS$\\downarrow$ \\\\\n\\midrule\nLHM++~\\cite{qiu2025lhm} & 25.744 & 0.023 & 0.032 \\\\\n\\methodname (Cr-ID) & 26.800 & 0.017 & 0.027 \\\\\n\\methodname (Self) & \\textbf{26.819} & \\textbf{0.015} & \\textbf{0.023} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\hfill\n\\begin{minipage}{0.45\\linewidth}\n\\centering\n\\footnotesize\n\\begin{tabular}{lcccc}\n\\toprule\nMethod & IDOL & LHM & MV-LHM & Ours \\\\\n\\midrule\nErr.($\\%$)$\\downarrow$ & 28.7 & 26.7 & 26.7 & \\textbf{17.3} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\end{table}\n\\subsection{Results}\n\\label{sec:comparisons}\n\n% \\begin{enumerate}\n% \\item Diverse singal driven results (Fig\n% \\item Cross-id driven results: one driven id video and severe target ids (Fig)\n% \\item Comparisons with LBS-based: LHM, SAM3d\\_LCA, EXavatar, Vid2ava (Fig)\n% \\item frame based loose cloth repose. (fig and tab) \n% \\end{enumerate}\n\n\n\\textbf{Reconstruction and Animation.}\nBy directly extracting motion cues from 2D signals, \\methodname bypasses explicit 3D pose estimation and rigid SMPL fitting. This end-to-end paradigm inherently avoids the error accumulation and domain shift vulnerabilities of LBS based animation. Consequently, our approach enables flexible 3D animation driven by highly diverse, cross-modality sources, including hand-drawn sketches, 2D skeletons, and out-of-domain humanoid images (Fig.~\\ref{fig:teaser}, \\ref{fig:our_results}). We refer readers to the supplementary video for dynamic visualizations.\n\n\\vspace{1mm}\n\\noindent\\textbf{Cross-identity driving and pose accuracy.}\nAlthough \\methodname is trained with matched source and driving identities, it generalizes to cross-identity driving without any explicit transfer module. To evaluate this setting on NeuMan, we curate 10 in-the-wild human images for each video and use Wan-Animate~\\cite{cheng2025wananimate} to animate them with the corresponding NeuMan motions. These generated videos are then used as driving signals for \\methodname. As shown in Tab.~\\ref{tab:cross_id_keypoint}, cross-identity driving remains close to self-reenactment and outperforms LHM++~\\cite{qiu2025lhm}, indicating that the animator primarily extracts motion rather than appearance from the driving signal. We also evaluate normalized 2D keypoint error using Sapiens detections; \\methodname achieves the lowest error, further confirming that direct implicit driving improves motion correctness.\n\n% A key advantage of \\methodname is its end-to-end motion driving paradigm, which bypasses the need for explicit 3D pose estimation or rigid SMPL parameter fitting. Traditional animation pipelines that rely on intermediate pose estimators are susceptible to error accumulation and often struggle with domain shifts when processing highly stylized visual inputs. In contrast, our neural animator directly extracts implicit motion cues from 2D driving signals. As demonstrated in Fig.~\\ref{fig:our_results} and Fig.~\\ref{fig:teaser}, this formulation enables flexible 3D avatar animation with a wide spectrum of driving sources, including hand-drawn sketches, color images, 2D keypoint skeletons, and other out-of-domain humanoid images. We refer readers to the supplementary video for more dynamic visualizations.\n\n\\vspace{3mm}\n\\noindent\\textbf{Comparison of reconstruction quality with LBS-based methods.}\nWe conduct qualitative comparisons between state-of-the-art optimization-based and feed-forward works with ours on 100 Cloth10K samples. As shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:loose_cloth}, LBS-based methods like IDOL and LHM exhibit severe ID shift or catastrophic geometric collapse on loose garments due to the skeletal binding constraints. By discarding the rigid LBS, our implicit animator can naturally capture the non-linear sliding of fabric and significantly mitigate garment tearing artifacts. Quantitatively, as reported in Tab.~\\ref{tab:main_comparison}, our approach significantly outperforms all baselines across photometric metrics on the Cloth10K dataset, demonstrating a clear advantage in modeling complex motion of non-rigid garments. On the NeuMan dataset, which primarily features standard walking motions and tighter clothing, \\methodname achieves comparable performance with feed-forward baselines, proving that our design maintains high fidelity on simpler, highly constrained scenarios as well.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/motion_flow.png}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Qualitative comparisons of animation smoothness}. We visualize the per-gaussian trajectory of (a) LBS-based animation baseline (b) our neural approach. The LBS-based methods suffer from erratic trajectories due to pose estimation errors and rigid skinning constraints. For all methods, we use SAM-3D-Body~\\cite{yang2026sam3dbody} to extract body parameters from driving videos and transform them to SMPL(X) for avatar animation.\n % Our method ensures temporally coherent and smooth streamlines across diverse identities and complex motions, as further detailed in the zoom-in views.\n }\n \\label{fig:gs_streamline}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\caption{\\textbf{Quantitative comparison of motion quality.} We compare our neural animator and various baselines. Due to the error and ambiguity of monocular pose estimation, LBS-based methods exhibit higher motion jitter, whereas our method achieves superior smoothness.}\n\\label{tab:msj_mae}\n\\begin{tabular}{lcc|cccc|c}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Methods} & IDOL & UP2YOU & Vid2Avatar & ExAvatar & LHM & MV-LHM$^\\ast$ & \\textbf{Ours} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\textbf{Animation} & \\multicolumn{2}{c|}{LBS} & \\multicolumn{4}{c|}{LBS + Neural} & \\textbf{Neural} \\\\\n\\midrule\nMSJ ($\\downarrow$) & 0.0315 & 0.0321 & 0.0237 & 0.0231 & 0.0214 & 0.0144 & \\textbf{0.0032} \\\\\nMAE ($\\downarrow$) & 0.0591 & 0.0591 & 0.0493 & 0.0532 & 0.0522 & 0.0477 & \\textbf{0.0225} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\vspace{3mm}\n\\noindent\\textbf{Comparisons of animation quality.} Since frame-wise photometric metrics fail to reflect temporal artifacts, we quantitatively evaluate animation stability using MAE and MSJ. As reported in Tab.~\\ref{tab:msj_mae}, \\methodname significantly outperforms all pure LBS and hybrid baselines, effectively mitigating the frame-to-frame jitter caused by noisy pose estimation and rigid skinning constraints and achieving a 4.5$\\times$ reduction over the strongest baseline (MV-LHM) on MSJ. Notably, the gains are consistent across identities and motions, indicating robust temporal behavior rather than isolated improvements.\n\n\\vspace{1mm}\nQualitatively, we visualize the per-Gaussian motion trajectories as streamlines (Fig.~\\ref{fig:gs_streamline}). Trajectories produced by LBS-based methods (Fig.~\\ref{fig:gs_streamline}a) exhibit severe \"zig-zag\" artifacts and erratic spatial shifts, particularly around high-dynamic regions. In contrast, our approach (Fig.~\\ref{fig:gs_streamline}b) yields smooth, continuous streamlines that better preserve local coherence over time. This advantage is especially evident in the nearly stationary pose (Identity 3, rightmost column), where motion trajectories should ideally degenerate into scatter points. The baseline instead produces spurious, chaotic streamlines induced by pose estimation noise, while \\methodname remains near-static and visually stable.\n\n% -------------ablation------\n\\begin{figure}[b!]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/abla_distillreg_finetune.png}\n \\footnotesize\\leftline{~Driver~~~w/o distill reg.~~~~~w/o multiview finetuning~~\\qquad~~~\\qquad~~~~Ours~~}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Ablations of distillation regularization and multiview finetuning.}}\n \\label{fig:abla_distill_mvfinetuning}\n\\end{figure}\n\\subsection{Ablation}\n\\label{sec:ablation}\n% In this part, we perform ablation experiments on our architectural designs and key training strategies.\n\n\\smallskip\n\\noindent\\textbf{Effect of distillation regularization.}\nAs shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:abla_distill_mvfinetuning}, removing LBS-guided distillation (\\textit{w/o distill reg.}) causes severe depth collapse and flattening artifacts, degrading both shape coherence and motion consistency. This confirms that while LBS is too rigid for final non-rigid animations, its structural prior is indispensable for resolving early-stage depth ambiguity and establishing global geometric stability.\n\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Effect of multiview finetuning.} Monocular supervision (\\textit{w/o multiview finetuning}) inherently suffers from perspective distortions and tends to produce floating Gaussian splats, leading to implausible renderings (Fig.~\\ref{fig:abla_distill_mvfinetuning}). Incorporating multi-view finetuning directly eliminates these perspective ambiguities and enforces the implicitly animated 3D Gaussians to be more spatially compact, significantly elevating the overall visual quality.\n\n\\vspace{2mm}\n\\noindent\\textbf{Effect of global rotation decoupling.}\nWe further investigate the design of the decoupled deformation field by training a variant that regresses all Gaussian offsets in a single unified model. As shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:abla_rot}, this setting (\\textit{w/o Rot}) forces the model to compensate for large articulations, leading to severe drifting artifacts and ragged boundaries. In contrast, our model focuses exclusively on local non-rigid dynamics, producing sharp results that closely align with LBS reference, as further corroborated by the quantitative results reported in Tab.~\\ref{tab:abla_metric}.\n\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\caption{\\textbf{Ablation study of each components in \\methodname training}. We evaluate the contribution of distillation regularization, multiview finetuning, and decoupling rotation from gaussian deformations on 100 samples of iPhone1K and 20 dome identities.}\n\\begin{tabular}{lccc|ccc}\n\\toprule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Setting}} & \\multicolumn{3}{c|}{\\textbf{iPhone data}} & \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\textbf{dome data}} \\\\\n& PSNR $\\uparrow$ & L1 $\\downarrow$ & LPIPS $\\downarrow$ & PSNR $\\uparrow$ & L1 $\\downarrow$ & LPIPS $\\downarrow$ \\\\\n\\midrule\nw/o Structural Distillation & 21.185 & 0.032 & 0.145 & 21.712 & 0.029 & 0.138 \\\\\nw/o Global Rotation & 23.102 & 0.025 & 0.118 & 23.294 & 0.022 & 0.115 \\\\\nw/o Multiview Finetuning & 23.931& 0.021 & 0.102 & 23.864 & 0.019 & 0.099 \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\textbf{Full Model (Ours)} & \\textbf{24.136} & \\textbf{0.019} & \\textbf{0.094} & \\textbf{24.374} & \\textbf{0.017} & \\textbf{0.093} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\label{tab:abla_metric}\n\\end{table}\n\n\n% \\smallskip\n% \\noindent\\textbf{Quantitative Ablation Results.}\n% As summarized in Tab.~\\ref{tab:ablation}, removing either the distillation loss or the global-local decoupling leads to a noticeable drop in all evaluation metrics. Notably, the LPIPS score degrades significantly without decoupling, reflecting a loss of fine-grained perceptual details in the animated output.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.48\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.8\\linewidth]{figures/abla_learnrot.png}\n \\footnotesize\\leftline{Driver~\\quad~~w/o Rot~~\\quad~Ours~\\qquad~LBS}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Ablation of decoupled global rotation prediction.} Without global rotation, the deformation model fails to handle large motion~(e.g. turning round).}\n \\label{fig:abla_rot}\n \\end{minipage}\\hfill\n% \\vspace{10pt}\n \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.5\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/driver_source_mismatch.png}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Challenging pose-driven cases.} \\methodname handles challenging poses and loose-cloth mismatch in many cases, while more extreme pose and body-shape mismatch remain difficult.}\n \\label{fig:driver_source_mismatch}\n \\end{minipage}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: section/05_conclusion.tex\n================================================\nWe present \\methodname, a novel LBS-free framework for high-fidelity 3D human animation. Bypassing explicit pose estimation entirely, \\methodname leverages a Transformer-based animator to directly extract motion cues from diverse 2D signals. To prevent the geometric collapse inherent to LBS-free approaches, we introduce a hybrid supervision strategy utilizing LBS-guided distillation. Finally, the decoupled global-local formulation empowers \\methodname to capture complex, unconstrained non-rigid dynamics. Extensive experiments demonstrate \\methodname's robust zero-shot generalization across heterogeneous identities, loose clothing, and cross-modality driving sources, establishing a highly flexible paradigm for 3D digital human animation.\n\n% \\vspace{3mm}\n% \\noindent\\textbf{Limitations and Future Work.} \n% Despite its remarkable flexibility, LUNA has a few limitations. First, severe occlusions in the driving video can disrupt the extracted 2D semantic cues, leading to animation jitter. \n% Second, \\methodname struggles to animate loose clothing with cross-identity driving signals due to the lack of temporal modeling. \n% Finally, the model may struggle with highly extreme, out-of-distribution poses. Moving forward, incorporating temporal sequence modeling and further scaling up the diversity of the training data represent promising directions to resolve these challenges.\n\n\\vspace{3mm}\n\\noindent\\textbf{Limitations and Future Work.} \nWhile LUNA is highly flexible, several directions remain to further strengthen its robustness. First, severe occlusions in the driving video can degrade the extracted 2D semantic cues and occasionally introduce temporal instability. Second, although \\methodname handles many challenging pose-driven and loose-cloth cases (Fig.~\\ref{fig:driver_source_mismatch}), very extreme poses or large body-shape mismatch can still degrade cross-identity animation because motion and shape are not explicitly disentangled. Moving forward, incorporating explicit temporal sequence modeling, improving occlusion-aware cue extraction, and scaling training with more diverse motions, apparel, and viewpoints are promising avenues to address these cases.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: section/06_appendix.tex\n================================================\n\\label{sec:supp}\n\n\\section{Implementation details}\n\\textbf{Transformer architecture of Identity encoder.}\nAs outlined in the main text, the Identity Encoder fuses 3D semantic query tokens $T_{gs} \\in \\mathbb{R}^{K \\times C}$ and 2D image tokens $T_{img} \\in \\mathbb{R}^{M \\times C}$ extracted by a pre-trained Sapiens encoder. In our implementation, we set $C = 1024, K=1892$. The Multimodal Transformer (MM-Transformer) comprises $L=8$ cascaded layers, operating with 16 parallel attention heads. To effectively preserve both holistic body context and fine-grained facial details across $N$ input views, we partition the aggregated image tokens $T_{img}$ into view-specific body tokens $\\mathbf{T}^{\\text{body}}_i$ and face tokens $\\mathbf{T}^{\\text{face}}_i$ for each view $i$. The $T_gs$ includes 4096 body Gaussian tokens and 4096 face Gaussian tokens. Within each of the 8 transformer layers, token representations are updated through three attention stages. \n\nFirst, for each input view $i \\in \\{1, \\dots, N\\}$, we independently apply image self-attention $\\mathcal{A}_{\\text{image}}$ to the body and face tokens:\n\\begin{align}\n\\mathbf{T}^{\\text{body}}_i &= \\mathcal{A}_{\\text{image}}(\\mathbf{T}^{\\text{body}}_i), \\label{eq:attn_body} \\\\\n\\mathbf{T}^{\\text{face}}_i &= \\mathcal{A}_{\\text{image}}(\\mathbf{T}^{\\text{face}}_i), \\label{eq:attn_face}\n\\end{align}\nwhere $\\mathcal{A}_{\\text{image}}$ is coupled with standard operations including LayerNorm, residual connections, and MLPs. Second, we apply geometric self-attention $\\mathcal{A}_{\\text{geometry}}$ to the 3D geometric tokens:\n\\begin{equation} \\label{eq:attn_geo}\\mathbf{T}_{\\text{gs}} = \\mathcal{A}_{\\text{geometry}}(\\mathbf{T}_{\\text{gs}}).\n\\end{equation}\nThird, we concatenate the per-view updated image tokens into global sequences across all views, such that $\\mathbf{T}^{\\text{body}} = [\\mathbf{T}^{\\text{body}}_1, \\dots, \\mathbf{T}^{\\text{body}}_N]$ and $\\mathbf{T}^{\\text{face}} = [\\mathbf{T}^{\\text{face}}_1, \\dots, \\mathbf{T}^{\\text{face}}_N]$. We then perform cross-modal fusion using multimodal attention $\\mathcal{A}_{\\text{MM}}$:\\begin{equation} \\label{eq:attn_multi}\\mathbf{T}^{\\text{gs}}, \\mathbf{T}^{\\text{body}}, \\mathbf{T}^{\\text{face}} = \\mathcal{A}_{\\text{MM}}(\\mathbf{T}_{\\text{gs}}, \\mathbf{T}^{\\text{body}}, \\mathbf{T}^{\\text{face}}).\n\\end{equation}\n% Crucially, to prevent high-frequency facial semantics from being diluted by the global body context, $\\mathcal{A}_{\\text{multimodal}}$ employs a specifically designed masked attention mechanism: face geometric tokens are restricted to only attend to face image tokens. This explicit partitioning enables bidirectional information exchange while maintaining identity stability.\n\\noindent\\textbf{Canonical decoder}. After passing through all 8 layers, the optimized geometric tokens form the final canonical identity tokens $T_{can}$. To decode $T_{can}$ into the 3D Gaussian $g = \\{\\mu, q, s, \\alpha, c\\}$, we employ independent MLP-based decoder heads for each attribution. Each head is implemented as a 3-layer residual MLP with a hidden dimension of 1024. It is noted that for each Gaussian token latent, we decode 8 Gaussians to enhance the reconstruction details. Thus, the final canonical avatar is composed of 65536 Gaussians.\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{LBS-based decoder for distillation loss}. To enable LBS-based distillation loss, we employ the pose-dependent decoder head, similar to LBS, to obtain the posed avatar Gaussians. Specifically, we employ a MLP head $\\mathcal{H}_{lbs}$ that takes the canonical identity tokens $T_{can}$ and the parametric pose $\\theta$ as inputs to regress local residuals:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Delta\\mu_{lbs}, \\Delta q_{lbs}, \\Delta c_{lbs} = \\mathcal{H}_{lbs}(T_{can}, \\theta).\n\\end{equation}\nThese residuals are applied to the initial canonical Gaussians to model pose-dependent deformations prior to skinning, yielding intermediate canonical attributes: $\\mu' = \\mu_{can} + \\Delta\\mu_{lbs}$, $q' = \\Delta q_{lbs} \\otimes q_{can}$, and $\\hat{c} = c_{can} + \\Delta c_{lbs}$. Next, we articulate these intermediate Gaussians into the posed space using standard Linear Blend Skinning (LBS). Finally, these explicitly articulated attributes $\\{\\hat{\\mu}, \\hat{q}, \\hat{c}\\}$ are detached from the computational graph and serve as the soft structural targets in the distillation loss $\\mathcal{L}_{distill}$.\n% Each Gaussian is assigned canonical blend weights $w_{i,k}$ representing its binding strength to the $k$-th skeletal bone. Given the rigid bone transformations $(R_k, t_k)$ derived from the pose parameters $\\theta$, the target spatial position $\\hat{\\mu}_i$ for the $i$-th Gaussian is computed as:\\begin{equation}\\hat{\\mu}i = \\sum{k=1}^{K} w_{i,k} \\left( R_k \\mu'{i} + t_k \\right).\n% \\end{equation}\n% Similarly, the target rotation $\\hat{q}_i$ is obtained by blending the bone rotations and applying them to the intermediate Gaussian rotation. To ensure valid quaternion representations during blending, we employ a normalized linear blending scheme:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\hat{q}i = \\frac{\\sum{k=1}^{K} w{i,k} q_{R, k}}{\\left| \\sum_{k=1}^{K} w_{i,k} q_{R, k} \\right|} \\otimes q'{i},\n% \\end{equation}\n% where $q{R, k}$ denotes the quaternion corresponding to the rotation matrix $R_k$, and $\\otimes$ represents quaternion multiplication.\n\n\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Training details.} As introduced in main submission, \\methodname is optimized through a two-stage training paradigm. \n\nIn the first stage of monocular video training, we extract identity information by sampling reference images from 4 timesteps, along with their corresponding cropped facial regions, as inputs to the Identity Encoder. To supervise the deformation, we randomly sample 4 additional timesteps from the same video to serve as both the driving signals and the target frames for the rendering loss. The input reference and driving images are processed at a resolution of $1024 \\times 768$, while the target rendering supervision is performed at a higher resolution of $2048 \\times 1536$. For global translation, we apply dataset-specific scaling parameters for z-axis distance: we set $\\sigma_t=10, \\mu_T=15$ for the large-scale Video35K dataset, and $\\sigma_t=0.5, \\mu_T=2.5$ for the higher-quality iPhone1K and Cloth10K datasets.\n\nDuring the finetuning stage on Dome data, we leverage ground-truth spatial translations, as highly accurate body tracking poses are readily available in the studio environment. To construct the training batch, we randomly sample 4 views across arbitrary timesteps as the reference input. For the rendering supervision, we select a specific target timestep and sample 5 different camera views simultaneously; one view is exclusively utilized as the driving signal, while the remaining 4 views provide strictly unaligned multi-view supervision for the rendering loss.\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Data argumentation.} Our framework natively supports both RGB images and 2D keypoints as driving signals. When utilizing RGB images for driving, we apply various data augmentations to the driving inputs, including grayscale conversion, Gaussian blurring, and random foreground spatial translation. This augmentation mechanism is specifically designed to prevent the appearance and identity information of the driving image from leaking into the target avatar. By corrupting the textural details of the driver, we force the implicit animator to focus on extracting pure kinematic motion cues, thereby guaranteeing zero-shot cross-identity animation during inference.\n\n\\section{More experiments}\n\\textbf{Qualitative Analysis of Pose Accuracy}.\nAs illustrated in Fig.~\\ref{fig:accurate_pose}, traditional LBS-based animation pipelines are inherently bottlenecked by the accuracy of off-the-shelf pose estimators. These intermediate estimators often introduce subtle prediction errors, leading to noticeable spatial misalignments in the final rendered avatar, such as inaccurate hand positions or stepping angles (highlighted in dashed boxes). By extracting motion cues directly from the source RGB images, our LBS-free approach completely bypasses these intermediate estimation bottlenecks, effectively reducing pose discrepancies and yielding more faithful articulations.\n\n\\begin{figure}[htbp]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/self_reenactment.png}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Qualitative comparison of pose accuracy.} LBS-based methods exhibit spatial misalignments due to intermediate pose estimation errors. In contrast, our direct 2D-driving approach effectively bypasses these bottlenecks to faithfully preserve the target pose details. We show input, LBS-based driving results, and our 2D driving outputs for each triplet.}\n \\label{fig:accurate_pose}\n\\end{figure}\n\\begin{figure}[ht]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/neuman_res.png}\n \\footnotesize\\leftline{~~Inputs~\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\quad~~Novel poses~\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\quad~~~~Novel views}\n \\caption{Our animation results on NeuMan dataset.}\n \\label{fig:neuman_dataset}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{NeuMan results.} Fig.~\\ref{fig:neuman_dataset} shows our reconstruction and animation results on the public NeuMan dataset. For each video clip, we manually select four frames to maximize viewpoint coverage as the reference input. We then use every frame in the sequence as a driving image to generate the animated 4D avatar.\n\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{AvatarHQ results.} We further evaluate novel-view reconstruction on AvatarHQ. Optimization-based baselines are fit to each subject from front-camera videos, while \\methodname uses four selected front-view reference frames and performs feed-forward inference. As shown in Tab.~\\ref{tab:avatarhq}, \\methodname outperforms ExAvatar and LSAvatar and remains close to recent per-subject optimization methods without subject-specific optimization.\n\n\\begin{table}[htbp]\n\\centering\n\\caption{\\textbf{Comparison on AvatarHQ.} Optimization-based baselines are fit to each subject from front-camera videos, while \\methodname uses four selected front-view reference frames and performs feed-forward inference.}\n\\label{tab:avatarhq}\n\\begin{tabular}{lccc}\n\\toprule\nMethod & PSNR$\\uparrow$ & L1$\\downarrow$ & LPIPS$\\downarrow$ \\\\\n\\midrule\nExAvatar~\\cite{moon2024exavatar} & 19.99 & 0.041 & 0.155 \\\\\nLSAvatar~\\cite{lsavatar2025} & 20.43 & 0.038 & 0.137 \\\\\nDressRecon~\\cite{tan2025dressrecon} & \\textbf{22.18} & \\textbf{0.022} & \\textbf{0.115} \\\\\nReLoo~\\cite{reloo} & 22.05 & 0.025 & 0.124 \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\methodname (Ours) & 21.85 & 0.031 & 0.131 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091182,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31982"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31982"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Haiwen Diao"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Yuhao Wang, Mu Qiao, Haiwen Diao, Yunzhi Zhuge, Pingping Zhang, Xindong Zhang, Lei Zhang, Huchuan Lu"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"ERA: Entropy-Guided Visual Token Pruning with Rectified Attention for Efficient MLLMs"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"17 pages, 7 figures"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.CV"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) incur prohibitive inference costs due to long visual token sequences. Training-free visual token reduction provides an efficient solution. However, existing methods distort attention distributions, giving rise to a phenomenon we term Attention Logit Collapse. To address this issue, we propose ERA, an Entropy-guided visual token pruning framework with Rectified Attention for efficient MLLMs. Specifically, ERA comprises three crucial components: Dual-view Entropy Pruning (DEP), Bias-aware Token Recycling (BTR), and Logit-preserving Attention Rectification (LAR). First, DEP identifies representative anchor tokens by jointly modeling visual diversity and head-wise saliency. BTR then recycles pruned tokens into their corresponding anchors while estimating a cluster-level logit bias. Building upon this, LAR injects the estimated bias into attention logits, effectively rectifying the collapse induced by token reduction. Together, these components preserve visual evidence even under aggressive compression, enabling robust performance across single-image, multi-image, and video settings on a wide range of MLLMs. Beyond delivering practical acceleration, ERA establishes logit-preserving visual token pruning as a principled framework for efficient MLLMs, unifying theoretical foundation, algorithmic design, and practical deployment. The code is at https://github.com/924973292/ERA."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:20:29 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:20:29 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Wang","Yuhao",""],["Qiao","Mu",""],["Diao","Haiwen",""],["Zhuge","Yunzhi",""],["Zhang","Pingping",""],["Zhang","Xindong",""],["Zhang","Lei",""],["Lu","Huchuan",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Wang\",\n \"Yuhao\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Qiao\",\n \"Mu\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Diao\",\n \"Haiwen\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Zhuge\",\n \"Yunzhi\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Zhang\",\n \"Pingping\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Zhang\",\n \"Xindong\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Zhang\",\n \"Lei\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Lu\",\n \"Huchuan\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: IEEEtran.cls\n================================================\n%%\n%% IEEEtran.cls 2015/08/26 version V1.8b\n%% \n%% This is the IEEEtran LaTeX class for authors of the Institute of \n%% Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Transactions journals and\n%% conferences.\n%% \n%% Support sites:\n%% http://www.michaelshell.org/tex/ieeetran/\n%% http://www.ctan.org/pkg/ieeetran\n%% and\n%% http://www.ieee.org/\n%%\n%% Based on the original 1993 IEEEtran.cls, but with many bug fixes\n%% and enhancements (from both JVH and MDS) over the 1996/7 version.\n%%\n%%\n%% Contributors:\n%% Gerry Murray (1993), Silvano Balemi (1993),\n%% Jon Dixon (1996), Peter N\"uchter (1996),\n%% Juergen von Hagen (2000), and Michael Shell (2001-2014)\n%% \n%% \n%% Copyright (c) 1993-2000 by Gerry Murray, Silvano Balemi, \n%% Jon Dixon, Peter N\"uchter,\n%% Juergen von Hagen\n%% and\n%% Copyright (c) 2001-2015 by Michael Shell\n%%\n%% Current maintainer (V1.3 to V1.8b): Michael Shell\n%% See:\n%% http://www.michaelshell.org/\n%% for current contact information.\n%%\n%% Special thanks to Peter Wilson (CUA) and Donald Arseneau\n%% for allowing the inclusion of the \\@ifmtarg command \n%% from their ifmtarg LaTeX package. \n%% \n%%*************************************************************************\n%% Legal Notice:\n%% This code is offered as-is without any warranty either expressed or\n%% implied; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or\n%% FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE! \n%% User assumes all risk.\n%% In no event shall the IEEE or any contributor to this code be liable for\n%% any damages or losses, including, but not limited to, incidental,\n%% consequential, or any other damages, resulting from the use or misuse\n%% of any information contained here.\n%%\n%% All comments are the opinions of their respective authors and are not\n%% necessarily endorsed by the IEEE.\n%%\n%% This work is distributed under the LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL)\n%% ( http://www.latex-project.org/ ) version 1.3, and may be freely used,\n%% distributed and modified. A copy of the LPPL, version 1.3, is included\n%% in the base LaTeX documentation of all distributions of LaTeX released\n%% 2003/12/01 or later.\n%% Retain all contribution notices and credits.\n%% ** Modified files should be clearly indicated as such, including **\n%% ** renaming them and changing author support contact information. **\n%%\n%% File list of work: IEEEtran.cls, IEEEtran_HOWTO.pdf, bare_adv.tex,\n%% bare_conf.tex, bare_jrnl.tex, bare_conf_compsoc.tex,\n%% bare_jrnl_compsoc.tex\n%% \n%% Major changes to the user interface should be indicated by an \n%% increase in the version numbers. If a version is a beta, it will \n%% be indicated with a BETA suffix, i.e., 1.4 BETA.\n%% Small changes can be indicated by appending letters to the version\n%% such as \"IEEEtran_v14a.cls\".\n%% In all cases, \\Providesclass, any \\typeout messages to the user,\n%% \\IEEEtransversionmajor and \\IEEEtransversionminor must reflect the\n%% correct version information.\n%% The changes should also be documented via source comments.\n%%*************************************************************************\n%%\n%\n% Available class options \n% e.g., \\documentclass[10pt,conference]{IEEEtran} \n% \n% *** choose only one from each category ***\n%\n% 9pt, 10pt, 11pt, 12pt\n% Sets normal font size. The default is 10pt.\n% \n% conference, journal, technote, peerreview, peerreviewca\n% determines format mode - conference papers, journal papers,\n% correspondence papers (technotes), or peer review papers. The user\n% should also select 9pt when using technote. peerreview is like\n% journal mode, but provides for a single-column \"cover\" title page for\n% anonymous peer review. The paper title (without the author names) is\n% repeated at the top of the page after the cover page. For peer review\n% papers, the \\IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle command must be executed (will\n% automatically be ignored for non-peerreview modes) at the place the\n% cover page is to end, usually just after the abstract (keywords are\n% not normally used with peer review papers). peerreviewca is like\n% peerreview, but allows the author names to be entered and formatted\n% as with conference mode so that author affiliation and contact\n% information can be easily seen on the cover page.\n% The default is journal.\n%\n% draft, draftcls, draftclsnofoot, final\n% determines if paper is formatted as a widely spaced draft (for\n% handwritten editor comments) or as a properly typeset final version.\n% draftcls restricts draft mode to the class file while all other LaTeX\n% packages (i.e., \\usepackage{graphicx}) will behave as final - allows\n% for a draft paper with visible figures, etc. draftclsnofoot is like\n% draftcls, but does not display the date and the word \"DRAFT\" at the foot\n% of the pages. If using one of the draft modes, the user will probably\n% also want to select onecolumn.\n% The default is final.\n%\n% letterpaper, a4paper, cspaper\n% determines paper size: 8.5in X 11in, 210mm X 297mm or 7.875in X 10.75in.\n% Changing the paper size in the standard journal and conference modes\n% will not alter the typesetting of the document - only the margins will\n% be affected. In particular, documents using the a4paper option will\n% have reduced side margins (A4 is narrower than US letter) and a longer\n% bottom margin (A4 is longer than US letter). For both cases, the top\n% margins will be the same and the text will be horizontally centered.\n% For the compsoc conference and draft modes, it is the margins that will\n% remain constant, and thus the text area size will vary, with changes in\n% the paper size.\n% The cspaper option is the special ``trim'' paper size (7.875in x 10.75in)\n% used in the actual publication of Computer Society journals. Under\n% compsoc journal mode, this option does not alter the typesetting of the\n% document. Authors should invoke the cspaper option only if requested to\n% do so by the editors of the specific journal they are submitting to.\n% For final submission to the IEEE, authors should generally use US letter \n% (8.5 X 11in) paper unless otherwise instructed. Note that authors should\n% ensure that all post-processing (ps, pdf, etc.) uses the same paper\n% specificiation as the .tex document. Problems here are by far the number\n% one reason for incorrect margins. IEEEtran will automatically set the\n% default paper size under pdflatex (without requiring any change to\n% pdftex.cfg), so this issue is more important to dvips users. Fix\n% config.ps, config.pdf, or ~/.dvipsrc for dvips, or use the\n% dvips -t papersize option instead as needed. For the cspaper option,\n% the corresponding dvips paper name is \"ieeecs\".\n% See the testflow documentation\n% http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/IEEEtran/testflow\n% for more details on dvips paper size configuration.\n% The default is letterpaper.\n%\n% oneside, twoside\n% determines if layout follows single sided or two sided (duplex)\n% printing. The only notable change is with the headings at the top of\n% the pages.\n% The default is oneside.\n%\n% onecolumn, twocolumn\n% determines if text is organized into one or two columns per page. One\n% column mode is usually used only with draft papers.\n% The default is twocolumn.\n%\n% comsoc, compsoc, transmag\n% Use the format of the IEEE Communications Society, IEEE Computer Society\n% or IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, respectively.\n%\n% romanappendices\n% Use the \"Appendix I\" convention when numbering appendices. IEEEtran.cls\n% now defaults to Alpha \"Appendix A\" convention - the opposite of what\n% v1.6b and earlier did.\n%\n% captionsoff\n% disables the display of the figure/table captions. Some IEEE journals\n% request that captions be removed and figures/tables be put on pages\n% of their own at the end of an initial paper submission. The endfloat\n% package can be used with this class option to achieve this format.\n%\n% nofonttune\n% turns off tuning of the font interword spacing. Maybe useful to those\n% not using the standard Times fonts or for those who have already \"tuned\"\n% their fonts.\n% The default is to enable IEEEtran to tune font parameters.\n%\n%\n%----------\n% Available CLASSINPUTs provided (all are macros unless otherwise noted):\n% \\CLASSINPUTbaselinestretch\n% \\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin\n% \\CLASSINPUToutersidemargin\n% \\CLASSINPUTtoptextmargin\n% \\CLASSINPUTbottomtextmargin\n%\n% Available CLASSINFOs provided:\n% \\ifCLASSINFOpdf (TeX if conditional)\n% \\CLASSINFOpaperwidth (macro)\n% \\CLASSINFOpaperheight (macro)\n% \\CLASSINFOnormalsizebaselineskip (length)\n% \\CLASSINFOnormalsizeunitybaselineskip (length)\n%\n% Available CLASSOPTIONs provided:\n% all class option flags (TeX if conditionals) unless otherwise noted,\n% e.g., \\ifCLASSOPTIONcaptionsoff\n% point size options provided as a single macro:\n% \\CLASSOPTIONpt\n% which will be defined as 9, 10, 11, or 12 depending on the document's\n% normalsize point size.\n% also, class option peerreviewca implies the use of class option peerreview\n% and classoption draft implies the use of class option draftcls\n\n\n\n\n\n\\ProvidesClass{IEEEtran}[2015/08/26 V1.8b by Michael Shell]\n\\typeout{-- See the \"IEEEtran_HOWTO\" manual for usage information.}\n\\typeout{-- http://www.michaelshell.org/tex/ieeetran/}\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\n% IEEEtran.cls version numbers, provided as of V1.3\n% These values serve as a way a .tex file can\n% determine if the new features are provided.\n% The version number of this IEEEtrans.cls can be obtained from \n% these values. i.e., V1.4\n% KEEP THESE AS INTEGERS! i.e., NO {4a} or anything like that-\n% (no need to enumerate \"a\" minor changes here)\n\\def\\IEEEtransversionmajor{1}\n\\def\\IEEEtransversionminor{8}\n\n\n% hook to allow easy changeover to IEEEtran.cls/tools.sty error reporting\n\\def\\@IEEEclspkgerror{\\ClassError{IEEEtran}}\n\n\n% These do nothing, but provide them like in article.cls\n\\newif\\if@restonecol\n\\newif\\if@titlepage\n\n\n% class option conditionals\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONonecolumn \\CLASSOPTIONonecolumnfalse\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONtwocolumn \\CLASSOPTIONtwocolumntrue\n\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONoneside \\CLASSOPTIONonesidetrue\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONtwoside \\CLASSOPTIONtwosidefalse\n\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONfinal \\CLASSOPTIONfinaltrue\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraft \\CLASSOPTIONdraftfalse\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls \\CLASSOPTIONdraftclsfalse\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofoot \\CLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofootfalse\n\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview \\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewfalse\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreviewca \\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewcafalse\n\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONjournal \\CLASSOPTIONjournaltrue\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference \\CLASSOPTIONconferencefalse\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote \\CLASSOPTIONtechnotefalse\n\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONnofonttune \\CLASSOPTIONnofonttunefalse\n\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONcaptionsoff \\CLASSOPTIONcaptionsofffalse\n\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONcomsoc \\CLASSOPTIONcomsocfalse\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc \\CLASSOPTIONcompsocfalse\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag \\CLASSOPTIONtransmagfalse\n\n\\newif\\ifCLASSOPTIONromanappendices \\CLASSOPTIONromanappendicesfalse\n\n\n% class info conditionals\n\n% indicates if pdf (via pdflatex) output\n\\newif\\ifCLASSINFOpdf \\CLASSINFOpdffalse\n\n\n% V1.6b internal flag to show if using a4paper\n\\newif\\if@IEEEusingAfourpaper \\@IEEEusingAfourpaperfalse\n% V1.6b internal flag to show if using cspaper\n\\newif\\if@IEEEusingcspaper \\@IEEEusingcspaperfalse\n\n\n% IEEEtran class scratch pad registers\n% dimen\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n% count\n\\newcount\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA\n\\newcount\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB\n\\newcount\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC\n% token list\n\\newtoks\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA\n\n% we use \\CLASSOPTIONpt so that we can ID the point size (even for 9pt docs)\n% as well as LaTeX's \\@ptsize to retain some compatability with some\n% external packages\n\\def\\@ptsize{0}\n% LaTeX does not support 9pt, so we set \\@ptsize to 0 - same as that of 10pt\n\\DeclareOption{9pt}{\\def\\CLASSOPTIONpt{9}\\def\\@ptsize{0}}\n\\DeclareOption{10pt}{\\def\\CLASSOPTIONpt{10}\\def\\@ptsize{0}}\n\\DeclareOption{11pt}{\\def\\CLASSOPTIONpt{11}\\def\\@ptsize{1}}\n\\DeclareOption{12pt}{\\def\\CLASSOPTIONpt{12}\\def\\@ptsize{2}}\n\n\n\n\\DeclareOption{letterpaper}{\\setlength{\\paperwidth}{8.5in}%\n \\setlength{\\paperheight}{11in}%\n \\@IEEEusingAfourpaperfalse\n \\@IEEEusingcspaperfalse\n \\def\\CLASSOPTIONpaper{letter}%\n \\def\\CLASSINFOpaperwidth{8.5in}%\n \\def\\CLASSINFOpaperheight{11in}}\n\n\n\\DeclareOption{a4paper}{\\setlength{\\paperwidth}{210mm}%\n \\setlength{\\paperheight}{297mm}%\n \\@IEEEusingAfourpapertrue\n \\@IEEEusingcspaperfalse\n \\def\\CLASSOPTIONpaper{a4}%\n \\def\\CLASSINFOpaperwidth{210mm}%\n \\def\\CLASSINFOpaperheight{297mm}}\n\n% special paper option for compsoc journals\n\\DeclareOption{cspaper}{\\setlength{\\paperwidth}{7.875in}%\n \\setlength{\\paperheight}{10.75in}%\n \\@IEEEusingcspapertrue\n \\@IEEEusingAfourpaperfalse\n \\def\\CLASSOPTIONpaper{ieeecs}%\n \\def\\CLASSINFOpaperwidth{7.875in}%\n \\def\\CLASSINFOpaperheight{10.75in}}\n\n\\DeclareOption{oneside}{\\@twosidefalse\\@mparswitchfalse\n \\CLASSOPTIONonesidetrue\\CLASSOPTIONtwosidefalse}\n\\DeclareOption{twoside}{\\@twosidetrue\\@mparswitchtrue\n \\CLASSOPTIONtwosidetrue\\CLASSOPTIONonesidefalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{onecolumn}{\\CLASSOPTIONonecolumntrue\\CLASSOPTIONtwocolumnfalse}\n\\DeclareOption{twocolumn}{\\CLASSOPTIONtwocolumntrue\\CLASSOPTIONonecolumnfalse}\n\n% If the user selects draft, then this class AND any packages\n% will go into draft mode.\n\\DeclareOption{draft}{\\CLASSOPTIONdrafttrue\\CLASSOPTIONdraftclstrue\n \\CLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofootfalse} \n% draftcls is for a draft mode which will not affect any packages\n% used by the document.\n\\DeclareOption{draftcls}{\\CLASSOPTIONdraftfalse\\CLASSOPTIONdraftclstrue\n \\CLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofootfalse} \n% draftclsnofoot is like draftcls, but without the footer.\n\\DeclareOption{draftclsnofoot}{\\CLASSOPTIONdraftfalse\\CLASSOPTIONdraftclstrue\n \\CLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofoottrue} \n\\DeclareOption{final}{\\CLASSOPTIONdraftfalse\\CLASSOPTIONdraftclsfalse\n \\CLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofootfalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{journal}{\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewfalse\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewcafalse\n \\CLASSOPTIONjournaltrue\\CLASSOPTIONconferencefalse\\CLASSOPTIONtechnotefalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{conference}{\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewfalse\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewcafalse\n \\CLASSOPTIONjournalfalse\\CLASSOPTIONconferencetrue\\CLASSOPTIONtechnotefalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{technote}{\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewfalse\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewcafalse\n \\CLASSOPTIONjournalfalse\\CLASSOPTIONconferencefalse\\CLASSOPTIONtechnotetrue}\n\n\\DeclareOption{peerreview}{\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewtrue\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewcafalse\n \\CLASSOPTIONjournalfalse\\CLASSOPTIONconferencefalse\\CLASSOPTIONtechnotefalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{peerreviewca}{\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewtrue\\CLASSOPTIONpeerreviewcatrue\n \\CLASSOPTIONjournalfalse\\CLASSOPTIONconferencefalse\\CLASSOPTIONtechnotefalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{nofonttune}{\\CLASSOPTIONnofonttunetrue}\n\n\\DeclareOption{captionsoff}{\\CLASSOPTIONcaptionsofftrue}\n\n\\DeclareOption{comsoc}{\\CLASSOPTIONcomsoctrue\\CLASSOPTIONcompsocfalse\\CLASSOPTIONtransmagfalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{compsoc}{\\CLASSOPTIONcomsocfalse\\CLASSOPTIONcompsoctrue\\CLASSOPTIONtransmagfalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{transmag}{\\CLASSOPTIONtransmagtrue\\CLASSOPTIONcomsocfalse\\CLASSOPTIONcompsocfalse}\n\n\\DeclareOption{romanappendices}{\\CLASSOPTIONromanappendicestrue}\n\n\n% default to US letter paper, 10pt, twocolumn, one sided, final, journal\n\\ExecuteOptions{letterpaper,10pt,twocolumn,oneside,final,journal}\n% overrride these defaults per user requests\n\\ProcessOptions\n\n\n\n%% -- Command Argument Scanning Support Functions --\n\n% Sets the category codes for punctuation to their normal values.\n% For local use with argument scanning.\n\\def\\IEEEnormalcatcodespunct{\\catcode`\\!=12 \\catcode`\\,=12 \\catcode`\\:=12\n\\catcode`\\;=12 \\catcode`\\`=12 \\catcode`\\'=12 \\catcode`\\\"=12 \\catcode`\\.=12\n\\catcode`\\/=12 \\catcode`\\?=12 \\catcode`\\*=12 \\catcode`\\+=12 \\catcode`\\-=12\n\\catcode`\\<=12 \\catcode`\\>=12 \\catcode`\\(=12 \\catcode`\\)=12 \\catcode`\\[=12\n\\catcode`\\]=12 \\catcode`\\==12 \\catcode`\\|=12}\n% Sets the category codes for numbers to their normal values.\n% For local use with argument scanning.\n\\def\\IEEEnormalcatcodesnum{\\catcode`\\0=12 \\catcode`\\1=12 \\catcode`\\2=12\n\\catcode`\\3=12 \\catcode`\\4=12 \\catcode`\\5=12 \\catcode`\\6=12 \\catcode`\\7=12\n\\catcode`\\8=12 \\catcode`\\9=12}\n% combined action of \\IEEEnormalcatcodespunct and \\IEEEnormalcatcodesnum\n\\def\\IEEEnormalcatcodes{\\IEEEnormalcatcodespunct\\IEEEnormalcatcodesnum}\n\n\n% usage: \\@IEEEextracttoken*{}\n% \\@IEEEextracttoken fully expands its argument (which it then stores in\n% \\@IEEEextracttokenarg) via \\edef and then the meaning of the first\n% nonbrace (but including the empty group) token found is assigned via \\let\n% to \\@IEEEextractedtoken as well as stored in the macro\n% \\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro. Tokens that would otherwise be discarded during\n% the acquisition of the first are stored in \\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded,\n% however their original relative brace nesting depths are not guaranteed to\n% be preserved.\n% If the argument is empty, or if a first nonbrace token does not exist (or\n% is an empty group), \\@IEEEextractedtoken will be \\relax and\n% \\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro and \\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded will be empty.\n%\n% For example:\n% \\@IEEEextracttoken{{{ab}{cd}}{{ef}g}}\n% results in:\n%\n% \\@IEEEextracttokenarg ==> a macro containing {{ab}{cd}}{{ef}g}\n% \\@IEEEextractedtoken ==> the letter a\n% \\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro ==> a macro containing a\n% \\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded ==> a macro containing bcd{ef}g\n%\n% the *-star form, \\@IEEEextracttoken*, does not expand its argument\n% contents during processing.\n\\def\\@IEEEextracttoken{\\@ifstar{\\let\\@IEEEextracttokendef=\\def\\@@IEEEextracttoken}{\\let\\@IEEEextracttokendef=\\edef\\@@IEEEextracttoken}}\n\n\\def\\@@IEEEextracttoken#1{\\@IEEEextracttokendef\\@IEEEextracttokenarg{#1}\\relax\n\\def\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded{}\\relax % initialize to empty\n% if the macro is unchanged after being acquired as a single undelimited argument\n% with anything after it being stripped off as a delimited argument\n% we know we have one token without any enclosing braces. loop until this is true.\n\\let\\@IEEEextracttokencurgroup\\@IEEEextracttokenarg\n\\loop\n % trap case of an empty argument as this would cause a problem with\n % \\@@@IEEEextracttoken's first (nondelimited) argument acquisition\n \\ifx\\@IEEEextracttokencurgroup\\@empty\n \\def\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro{}\\relax\n \\else\n \\expandafter\\@@@IEEEextracttoken\\@IEEEextracttokencurgroup\\@IEEEgeneralsequenceDELIMITER\\relax\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\\@IEEEextracttokencurgroup\n \\else\n \\let\\@IEEEextracttokencurgroup=\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\n\\repeat\n% we can safely do a \\let= here because there should be at most one token\n% the relax is needed to handle the case of no token found\n\\expandafter\\let\\expandafter\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\\relax}\n\n\\def\\@@@IEEEextracttoken#1#2\\@IEEEgeneralsequenceDELIMITER{\\def\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro{#1}\\relax\n\\def\\@@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded{#2}\\expandafter\\expandafter\\expandafter\\def\\expandafter\\expandafter\\expandafter\n\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\expandafter\\expandafter\\expandafter\n{\\expandafter\\@@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded}}\n%%\n%% -- End of Command Argument Scanning Support Functions --\n\n\n\n% Computer Society conditional execution command\n\\long\\def\\@IEEEcompsoconly#1{\\relax\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\\relax#1\\relax\\fi\\relax}\n% inverse\n\\long\\def\\@IEEEnotcompsoconly#1{\\relax\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\\else\\relax#1\\relax\\fi\\relax}\n% compsoc conference\n\\long\\def\\@IEEEcompsocconfonly#1{\\relax\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\\relax#1\\relax\\fi\\fi\\relax}\n% compsoc not conference\n\\long\\def\\@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly#1{\\relax\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\\else\\relax#1\\relax\\fi\\fi\\relax}\n\n\n% comsoc verify that newtxmath, mtpro2, mt11p or mathtime has been loaded\n\\def\\@IEEEcomsocverifymathfont{\\typeout{-- Verifying Times compatible math font.}\\relax\n \\@ifpackageloaded{newtxmath}{\\typeout{-- newtxmath loaded, OK.}}{\\@@IEEEcomsocverifymathfont}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEcomsocverifymathfont{\\@ifpackageloaded{mtpro2}{\\typeout{-- mtpro2 loaded, OK.}}{\\@@@IEEEcomsocverifymathfont}}\n\\def\\@@@IEEEcomsocverifymathfont{\\@ifpackageloaded{mt11p}{\\typeout{-- mt11p2 loaded, OK.}}{\\@@@@IEEEcomsocverifymathfont}}\n\\def\\@@@@IEEEcomsocverifymathfont{\\@ifpackageloaded{mathtime}{\\typeout{-- mathtime loaded, OK.}}{\\@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont}}\n\n% comsoc, if a Times math font was not loaded by user, enforce it\n\\def\\@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont{\\typeout{** Times compatible math font not found, forcing.}\\relax\n\\IfFileExists{newtxmath.sty}{\\typeout{-- Found newtxmath, loading.}\\RequirePackage{newtxmath}}{\\@@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont{\\IfFileExists{mtpro2.sty}{\\typeout{-- Found mtpro2, loading.}\\RequirePackage{mtpro2}}{\\@@@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont}}\n\\def\\@@@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont{\\IfFileExists{mt11p.sty}{\\typeout{-- Found mt11p, loading.}\\RequirePackage{mt11p}}{\\@@@@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont}}\n\\def\\@@@@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont{\\IfFileExists{mathtime.sty}{\\typeout{-- Found mathtime, loading.}\\RequirePackage{mathtime}}{\\@@@@@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont}}\n% if no acceptable Times math font package found, error with newtxmath requirement\n\\def\\@@@@@IEEEcomsocenforcemathfont{\\typeout{** No Times compatible math font package found. newtxmath is required.}\\RequirePackage{newtxmath}}\n\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcomsoc\n % ensure that if newtxmath is used, the cmintegrals option is also invoked\n \\PassOptionsToPackage{cmintegrals}{newtxmath}\n % comsoc requires a Times like math font\n % ensure this requirement is satisfied at document start\n \\AtBeginDocument{\\@IEEEcomsocverifymathfont}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% The IEEE uses Times Roman font, so we'll default to Times.\n% These three commands make up the entire times.sty package.\n\\renewcommand{\\sfdefault}{phv}\n\\renewcommand{\\rmdefault}{ptm}\n\\renewcommand{\\ttdefault}{pcr}\n\n% V1.7 compsoc nonconference papers, use Palatino/Palladio as the main text font,\n% not Times Roman.\n\\@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly{\\renewcommand{\\rmdefault}{ppl}}\n\n% enable the selected main text font\n\\normalfont\\selectfont\n\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcomsoc\n \\typeout{-- Using IEEE Communications Society mode.}\n\\fi\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\typeout{-- Using IEEE Computer Society mode.}\n\\fi\n\n\n% V1.7 conference notice message hook\n\\def\\@IEEEconsolenoticeconference{\\typeout{}%\n\\typeout{** Conference Paper **}%\n\\typeout{Before submitting the final camera ready copy, remember to:}%\n\\typeout{}%\n\\typeout{ 1. Manually equalize the lengths of two columns on the last page}%\n\\typeout{ of your paper;}%\n\\typeout{}%\n\\typeout{ 2. Ensure that any PostScript and/or PDF output post-processing}%\n\\typeout{ uses only Type 1 fonts and that every step in the generation}%\n\\typeout{ process uses the appropriate paper size.}%\n\\typeout{}}\n\n\n% we can send console reminder messages to the user here\n\\AtEndDocument{\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\\@IEEEconsolenoticeconference\\fi}\n\n\n% warn about the use of single column other than for draft mode\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtwocolumn\\else%\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls\\else%\n \\typeout{** ATTENTION: Single column mode is not typically used with IEEE publications.}%\n \\fi%\n\\fi\n\n\n% V1.7 improved paper size setting code.\n% Set pdfpage and dvips paper sizes. Conditional tests are similar to that\n% of ifpdf.sty. Retain within {} to ensure tested macros are never altered,\n% even if only effect is to set them to \\relax.\n% if \\pdfoutput is undefined or equal to relax, output a dvips special\n{\\@ifundefined{pdfoutput}{\\AtBeginDvi{\\special{papersize=\\CLASSINFOpaperwidth,\\CLASSINFOpaperheight}}}{%\n% pdfoutput is defined and not equal to \\relax\n% check for pdfpageheight existence just in case someone sets pdfoutput\n% under non-pdflatex. If exists, set them regardless of value of \\pdfoutput.\n\\@ifundefined{pdfpageheight}{\\relax}{\\global\\pdfpagewidth\\paperwidth\n\\global\\pdfpageheight\\paperheight}%\n% if using \\pdfoutput=0 under pdflatex, send dvips papersize special\n\\ifcase\\pdfoutput\n\\AtBeginDvi{\\special{papersize=\\CLASSINFOpaperwidth,\\CLASSINFOpaperheight}}%\n\\else\n% we are using pdf output, set CLASSINFOpdf flag\n\\global\\CLASSINFOpdftrue\n\\fi}}\n\n% let the user know the selected papersize\n\\typeout{-- Using \\CLASSINFOpaperwidth\\space x \\CLASSINFOpaperheight\\space\n(\\CLASSOPTIONpaper)\\space paper.}\n\n\\ifCLASSINFOpdf\n\\typeout{-- Using PDF output.}\n\\else\n\\typeout{-- Using DVI output.}\n\\fi\n\n\n% The idea hinted here is for LaTeX to generate markleft{} and markright{}\n% automatically for you after you enter \\author{}, \\journal{},\n% \\journaldate{}, journalvol{}, \\journalnum{}, etc.\n% However, there may be some backward compatibility issues here as\n% well as some special applications for IEEEtran.cls and special issues\n% that may require the flexible \\markleft{}, \\markright{} and/or \\markboth{}.\n% We'll leave this as an open future suggestion.\n%\\newcommand{\\journal}[1]{\\def\\@journal{#1}}\n%\\def\\@journal{}\n\n\n\n% pointsize values\n% used with ifx to determine the document's normal size\n\\def\\@IEEEptsizenine{9}\n\\def\\@IEEEptsizeten{10}\n\\def\\@IEEEptsizeeleven{11}\n\\def\\@IEEEptsizetwelve{12}\n\n\n\n% FONT DEFINITIONS (No sizexx.clo file needed) \n% V1.6 revised font sizes, displayskip values and\n% revised normalsize baselineskip to reduce underfull vbox problems\n% on the 58pc = 696pt = 9.5in text height we want\n% normalsize #lines/column baselineskip (aka leading)\n% 9pt 63 11.0476pt (truncated down)\n% 10pt 58 12pt (exact)\n% 11pt 52 13.3846pt (truncated down)\n% 12pt 50 13.92pt (exact)\n%\n\n% we need to store the nominal baselineskip for the given font size\n% in case baselinestretch ever changes.\n% this is a dimen, so it will not hold stretch or shrink\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\n\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\\baselineskip\n\n\n\n%% ******* WARNING! *******\n%%\n%% Authors should not alter font sizes, baselineskip (\"leading\"),\n%% margins or other spacing values in an attempt to squeeze more\n%% material on each page.\n%%\n%% The IEEE's own typesetting software will restore the correct\n%% values when re-typesetting/proofing the submitted document,\n%% possibly resulting in unexpected article over length charges.\n%%\n%% ******* WARNING! *******\n\n\n% 9pt option defaults\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizenine\n\\typeout{-- This is a 9 point document.}\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{9}{11.0476pt}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{11.0476pt}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 3pt minus 1pt\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 3pt\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 3pt minus 1pt\n\\def\\small{\\@setfontsize{\\small}{8.5}{10pt}}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize{\\footnotesize}{8}{9pt}}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize{\\scriptsize}{7}{8pt}}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setfontsize{\\tiny}{5}{6pt}}\n% sublargesize is the same as large - 10pt\n\\def\\sublargesize{\\@setfontsize{\\sublargesize}{10}{12pt}}\n\\def\\large{\\@setfontsize{\\large}{10}{12pt}}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setfontsize{\\Large}{12}{14pt}}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize{\\LARGE}{14}{17pt}}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setfontsize{\\huge}{17}{20pt}}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setfontsize{\\Huge}{20}{24pt}}\n\\fi\n%\n% 10pt option defaults\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizeten\n\\typeout{-- This is a 10 point document.}\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{10}{12.00pt}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{12pt}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 4pt minus 2pt\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 4pt\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 4pt minus 2pt\n\\def\\small{\\@setfontsize{\\small}{9}{10pt}}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize{\\footnotesize}{8}{9pt}}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize{\\scriptsize}{7}{8pt}}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setfontsize{\\tiny}{5}{6pt}}\n% sublargesize is a tad smaller than large - 11pt\n\\def\\sublargesize{\\@setfontsize{\\sublargesize}{11}{13.4pt}}\n\\def\\large{\\@setfontsize{\\large}{12}{14pt}}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setfontsize{\\Large}{14}{17pt}}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize{\\LARGE}{17}{20pt}}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setfontsize{\\huge}{20}{24pt}}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setfontsize{\\Huge}{24}{28pt}}\n\\fi\n%\n% 11pt option defaults\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizeeleven\n\\typeout{-- This is an 11 point document.}\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{11}{13.3846pt}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{13.3846pt}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 5pt minus 3pt\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 5pt\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 5pt minus 3pt\n\\def\\small{\\@setfontsize{\\small}{10}{12pt}}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize{\\footnotesize}{9}{10.5pt}}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize{\\scriptsize}{8}{9pt}}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setfontsize{\\tiny}{6}{7pt}}\n% sublargesize is the same as large - 12pt\n\\def\\sublargesize{\\@setfontsize{\\sublargesize}{12}{14pt}}\n\\def\\large{\\@setfontsize{\\large}{12}{14pt}}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setfontsize{\\Large}{14}{17pt}}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize{\\LARGE}{17}{20pt}}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setfontsize{\\huge}{20}{24pt}}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setfontsize{\\Huge}{24}{28pt}}\n\\fi\n%\n% 12pt option defaults\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizetwelve\n\\typeout{-- This is a 12 point document.}\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{12}{13.92pt}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{13.92pt}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 6pt minus 4pt\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 6pt\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 6pt minus 4pt\n\\def\\small{\\@setfontsize{\\small}{10}{12pt}}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize{\\footnotesize}{9}{10.5pt}}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize{\\scriptsize}{8}{9pt}}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setfontsize{\\tiny}{6}{7pt}}\n% sublargesize is the same as large - 14pt\n\\def\\sublargesize{\\@setfontsize{\\sublargesize}{14}{17pt}}\n\\def\\large{\\@setfontsize{\\large}{14}{17pt}}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setfontsize{\\Large}{17}{20pt}}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize{\\LARGE}{20}{24pt}}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setfontsize{\\huge}{22}{26pt}}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setfontsize{\\Huge}{24}{28pt}}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% V1.8a compsoc font sizes\n% compsoc font sizes use bp \"Postscript\" point units (1/72in) \n% rather than the traditional pt (1/72.27)\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n% -- compsoc defaults --\n% ** will override some of these values later **\n% 9pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizenine\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{9bp}{11bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{11bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 3bp minus 1bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0bp plus 3bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 3bp minus 1bp\n\\def\\small{\\@setfontsize{\\small}{8.5bp}{10bp}}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize{\\footnotesize}{8bp}{9bp}}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize{\\scriptsize}{7bp}{8bp}}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setfontsize{\\tiny}{5bp}{6bp}}\n% sublargesize is the same as large - 10bp\n\\def\\sublargesize{\\@setfontsize{\\sublargesize}{10bp}{12bp}}\n\\def\\large{\\@setfontsize{\\large}{10bp}{12bp}}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setfontsize{\\Large}{12bp}{14bp}}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize{\\LARGE}{14bp}{17bp}}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setfontsize{\\huge}{17bp}{20bp}}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setfontsize{\\Huge}{20bp}{24bp}}\n\\fi\n%\n% 10pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizeten\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{10bp}{12bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{12bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 4bp minus 2bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 4bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 4bp minus 2bp\n\\def\\small{\\@setfontsize{\\small}{9bp}{10bp}}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize{\\footnotesize}{8bp}{9bp}}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize{\\scriptsize}{7bp}{8bp}}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setfontsize{\\tiny}{5bp}{6bp}}\n% sublargesize is a tad smaller than large - 11bp\n\\def\\sublargesize{\\@setfontsize{\\sublargesize}{11bp}{13.5bp}}\n\\def\\large{\\@setfontsize{\\large}{12bp}{14bp}}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setfontsize{\\Large}{14bp}{17bp}}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize{\\LARGE}{17bp}{20bp}}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setfontsize{\\huge}{20bp}{24bp}}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setfontsize{\\Huge}{24bp}{28bp}}\n\\fi\n%\n% 11pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizeeleven\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{11bp}{13.5bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{13.5bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 5bp minus 3bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 5bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 5bp minus 3bp\n\\def\\small{\\@setfontsize{\\small}{10bp}{12bp}}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize{\\footnotesize}{9bp}{10.5bp}}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize{\\scriptsize}{8bp}{9bp}}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setfontsize{\\tiny}{6bp}{7bp}}\n% sublargesize is the same as large - 12bp\n\\def\\sublargesize{\\@setfontsize{\\sublargesize}{12bp}{14bp}}\n\\def\\large{\\@setfontsize{\\large}{12bp}{14bp}}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setfontsize{\\Large}{14bp}{17bp}}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize{\\LARGE}{17bp}{20bp}}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setfontsize{\\huge}{20bp}{24bp}}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setfontsize{\\Huge}{24bp}{28bp}}\n\\fi\n%\n% 12pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizetwelve\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{12bp}{14bp}}%\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{14bp}%\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 6bp minus 4bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 6bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 6bp minus 4bp\n\\def\\small{\\@setfontsize{\\small}{10bp}{12bp}}\n\\def\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize{\\footnotesize}{9bp}{10.5bp}}\n\\def\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize{\\scriptsize}{8bp}{9bp}}\n\\def\\tiny{\\@setfontsize{\\tiny}{6bp}{7bp}}\n% sublargesize is the same as large - 14bp\n\\def\\sublargesize{\\@setfontsize{\\sublargesize}{14bp}{17bp}}\n\\def\\large{\\@setfontsize{\\large}{14bp}{17bp}}\n\\def\\Large{\\@setfontsize{\\Large}{17bp}{20bp}}\n\\def\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize{\\LARGE}{20bp}{24bp}}\n\\def\\huge{\\@setfontsize{\\huge}{22bp}{26bp}}\n\\def\\Huge{\\@setfontsize{\\Huge}{24bp}{28bp}}\n\\fi\n%\n% -- override defaults: compsoc journals use special normalsizes --\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n% \n% compsoc conferences\n% 9pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizenine\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{9bp}{10.8bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{10.8bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 3bp minus 1bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0bp plus 3bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 3bp minus 1bp\n\\fi\n% 10pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizeten\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{10bp}{11.2bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{11.2bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 4bp minus 2bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 4bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 4bp minus 2bp\n\\fi\n% 11pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizeeleven\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{11bp}{13.2bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{13.2bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 5bp minus 3bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 5bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 5bp minus 3bp\n\\fi\n% 12pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizetwelve\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{12bp}{14.4bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{14.4bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 6bp minus 4bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 6bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 6bp minus 4bp\n\\fi\n% \n% compsoc nonconferences\n\\else\n% 9pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizenine\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{9bp}{10.8bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{10.8bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 3bp minus 1bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0bp plus 3bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 3bp minus 1bp\n\\fi\n% 10pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizeten\n% the official spec is 9.5bp with 11.4bp leading for 10pt,\n% but measurements of proofs suggest upto 11.723bp leading\n% here we'll use 11.54bp which gives 61 lines per column\n% with the standard compsoc margins\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{9.5bp}{11.54bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{11.54bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 4bp minus 2bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 4bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 4bp minus 2bp\n\\fi\n% 11pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizeeleven\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{11bp}{13.2bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{13.2bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 5bp minus 3bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 5bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 5bp minus 3bp\n\\fi\n% 12pt\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizetwelve\n\\def\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize{\\normalsize}{12bp}{14.4bp}}\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}{14.4bp}\n\\normalsize\n\\abovedisplayskip 1.5ex plus 6bp minus 4bp\n\\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n\\abovedisplayshortskip 0pt plus 6bp\n\\belowdisplayshortskip 1.5ex plus 6bp minus 4bp\n\\fi\n\\fi\\fi\n\n\n\n\n% V1.6 The Computer Modern Fonts will issue a substitution warning for\n% 24pt titles (24.88pt is used instead, but the default and correct\n% Times font will scale exactly as needed) increase the substitution\n% tolerance to turn off this warning.\n% \n% V1.8a, the compsoc bp font sizes can also cause bogus font substitution\n% warnings with footnote or scriptsize math and the $\\bullet$ itemized\n% list of \\IEEEcompsocitemizethanks. So, increase this to 1.5pt or more.\n\\def\\fontsubfuzz{1.7bp}\n\n\n% warn the user in case they forget to use the 9pt option with\n% technote\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote%\n \\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizenine\\else%\n \\typeout{** ATTENTION: Technotes are normally 9pt documents.}%\n \\fi%\n\\fi\n\n\n% V1.7\n% Improved \\textunderscore to provide a much better fake _ when used with\n% OT1 encoding. Under OT1, detect use of pcr or cmtt \\ttfamily and use\n% available true _ glyph for those two typewriter fonts.\n\\def\\@IEEEstringptm{ptm} % Times Roman family\n\\def\\@IEEEstringppl{ppl} % Palatino Roman family\n\\def\\@IEEEstringphv{phv} % Helvetica Sans Serif family\n\\def\\@IEEEstringpcr{pcr} % Courier typewriter family\n\\def\\@IEEEstringcmtt{cmtt} % Computer Modern typewriter family\n\\DeclareTextCommandDefault{\\textunderscore}{\\leavevmode\n\\ifx\\f@family\\@IEEEstringpcr\\string_\\else\n\\ifx\\f@family\\@IEEEstringcmtt\\string_\\else\n\\ifx\\f@family\\@IEEEstringptm\\kern 0em\\vbox{\\hrule\\@width 0.5em\\@height 0.5pt\\kern -0.3ex}\\else\n\\ifx\\f@family\\@IEEEstringppl\\kern 0em\\vbox{\\hrule\\@width 0.5em\\@height 0.5pt\\kern -0.3ex}\\else\n\\ifx\\f@family\\@IEEEstringphv\\kern -0.03em\\vbox{\\hrule\\@width 0.62em\\@height 0.52pt\\kern -0.33ex}\\kern -0.03em\\else\n\\kern 0.09em\\vbox{\\hrule\\@width 0.6em\\@height 0.44pt\\kern -0.63pt\\kern -0.42ex}\\kern 0.09em\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\relax}\n\n\n\n\n% set the default \\baselinestretch\n\\def\\baselinestretch{1}\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls\n \\def\\baselinestretch{1.5}% default baselinestretch for draft modes\n\\fi \n\n\n% process CLASSINPUT baselinestretch\n\\ifx\\CLASSINPUTbaselinestretch\\@IEEEundefined\n\\else\n \\edef\\baselinestretch{\\CLASSINPUTbaselinestretch} % user CLASSINPUT override\n \\typeout{** ATTENTION: Overriding \\string\\baselinestretch\\space to\n \\baselinestretch\\space via \\string\\CLASSINPUT.}\n\\fi\n\n\\small\\normalsize % make \\baselinestretch take affect\n\n\n\n\n% store the normalsize baselineskip\n\\newdimen\\CLASSINFOnormalsizebaselineskip\n\\CLASSINFOnormalsizebaselineskip=\\baselineskip\\relax\n% and the normalsize unity (baselinestretch=1) baselineskip\n% we could save a register by giving the user access to\n% \\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip. However, let's protect\n% its read only internal status\n\\newdimen\\CLASSINFOnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\n\\CLASSINFOnormalsizeunitybaselineskip=\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\\relax\n% store the nominal value of jot\n\\newdimen\\IEEEnormaljot\n\\IEEEnormaljot=0.25\\baselineskip\\relax\n\n% set \\jot\n\\jot=\\IEEEnormaljot\\relax\n\n\n\n\n% V1.6, we are now going to fine tune the interword spacing\n% The default interword glue for Times under TeX appears to use a\n% nominal interword spacing of 25% (relative to the font size, i.e., 1em)\n% a maximum of 40% and a minimum of 19%.\n% For example, 10pt text uses an interword glue of:\n% \n% 2.5pt plus 1.49998pt minus 0.59998pt\n% \n% However, the IEEE allows for a more generous range which reduces the need\n% for hyphenation, especially for two column text. Furthermore, the IEEE\n% tends to use a little bit more nominal space between the words.\n% The IEEE's interword spacing percentages appear to be:\n% 35% nominal\n% 23% minimum\n% 50% maximum\n% (They may even be using a tad more for the largest fonts such as 24pt.)\n% \n% for bold text, the IEEE increases the spacing a little more:\n% 37.5% nominal\n% 23% minimum\n% 55% maximum\n\n% here are the interword spacing ratios we'll use\n% for medium (normal weight)\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceratioM{0.35}\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceMINratioM{0.23}\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceMAXratioM{0.50}\n\n% for bold\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceratioB{0.375}\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceMINratioB{0.23}\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceMAXratioB{0.55}\n\n\n% compsoc nonconference papers use Palatino,\n% tweak settings to better match the proofs\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\\else\n% for medium (normal weight)\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceratioM{0.28}\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceMINratioM{0.21}\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceMAXratioM{0.47}\n% for bold\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceratioB{0.305}\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceMINratioB{0.21}\n\\def\\@IEEEinterspaceMAXratioB{0.52}\n\\fi\\fi\n\n\n% command to revise the interword spacing for the current font under TeX:\n% \\fontdimen2 = nominal interword space\n% \\fontdimen3 = interword stretch\n% \\fontdimen4 = interword shrink\n% since all changes to the \\fontdimen are global, we can enclose these commands\n% in braces to confine any font attribute or length changes\n\\def\\@@@IEEEsetfontdimens#1#2#3{{%\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}{\\f@size pt}% grab the font size in pt, could use 1em instead.\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{#1\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}%\n\\fontdimen2\\font=\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\addtolength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{-#2\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}%\n\\fontdimen3\\font=-\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{#1\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}%\n\\addtolength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{-#3\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}%\n\\fontdimen4\\font=\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax}}\n\n% revise the interword spacing for each font weight\n\\def\\@@IEEEsetfontdimens{{%\n\\mdseries\n\\@@@IEEEsetfontdimens{\\@IEEEinterspaceratioM}{\\@IEEEinterspaceMAXratioM}{\\@IEEEinterspaceMINratioM}%\n\\bfseries\n\\@@@IEEEsetfontdimens{\\@IEEEinterspaceratioB}{\\@IEEEinterspaceMAXratioB}{\\@IEEEinterspaceMINratioB}%\n}}\n\n% revise the interword spacing for each font shape\n% \\slshape is not often used for IEEE work and is not altered here. The \\scshape caps are\n% already a tad too large in the free LaTeX fonts (as compared to what the IEEE uses) so we\n% won't alter these either.\n\\def\\@IEEEsetfontdimens{{%\n\\normalfont\n\\@@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\normalfont\\itshape\n\\@@IEEEsetfontdimens\n}}\n\n% command to revise the interword spacing for each font size (and shape\n% and weight). Only the \\rmfamily is done here as \\ttfamily uses a \n% fixed spacing and \\sffamily is not used as the main text of IEEE papers.\n\\def\\@IEEEtunefonts{{\\selectfont\\rmfamily\n\\tiny\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\scriptsize\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\footnotesize\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\small\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\normalsize\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\sublargesize\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\large\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\LARGE\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\huge\\@IEEEsetfontdimens\n\\Huge\\@IEEEsetfontdimens}}\n\n% if the nofonttune class option is not given, revise the interword spacing\n% now - in case IEEEtran makes any default length measurements, and make\n% sure all the default fonts are loaded\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONnofonttune\\else\n\\@IEEEtunefonts\n\\fi\n\n% and again at the start of the document in case the user loaded different fonts\n\\AtBeginDocument{\\ifCLASSOPTIONnofonttune\\else\\@IEEEtunefonts\\fi}\n\n\n\n\n\n% -- V1.8a page setup commands --\n\n% The default sample text for calculating margins\n% Note that IEEE publications use \\scriptsize for headers and footers.\n\\def\\IEEEdefaultsampletext{\\normalfont\\normalsize gT}\n\\def\\IEEEdefaultheadersampletext{\\normalfont\\scriptsize T}% IEEE headers default to uppercase\n\\def\\IEEEdefaultfootersampletext{\\normalfont\\scriptsize gT}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\IEEEsettextwidth{inner margin}{outer margin}\n% Sets \\textwidth to allow the specified inner and outer margins\n% for the current \\paperwidth.\n\\def\\IEEEsettextwidth#1#2{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\paperwidth\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB#1\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB#2\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\textwidth\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\IEEEsetsidemargin{mode: i, o, c, a}{margin/offset}\n% Sets \\oddsidemargin and \\evensidemargin to yield the specified margin\n% of the given mode.\n% The available modes are:\n% i = inner margin\n% o = outer margin\n% c = centered, with the given offset\n% a = adjust the margins using the given offset\n% For the offsets, positive values increase the inner margin.\n% \\textwidth should be set properly for the given margins before calling this\n% function.\n\\def\\IEEEsetsidemargin#1#2{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA #2\\relax\n\\@IEEEextracttoken{#1}\\relax\n% check for mode errors\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\\@empty\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Empty mode type in \\string\\IEEEsetsidemargin\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `i'}{Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEsetsidemargin\\space are: i, o, c and a.}\\relax\n \\let\\@IEEEextractedtoken=i\\relax\n \\def\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro{i}\\relax\n\\else\n \\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\@empty\\else\n \\typeout{** WARNING: \\string\\IEEEsetsidemargin\\space mode specifiers after the first in `\\@IEEEextracttokenarg' ignored (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\relax\n \\fi\n\\fi\n% handle each mode\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken a\\relax\n \\advance\\oddsidemargin by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken c\\relax\n \\oddsidemargin\\paperwidth\n \\advance\\oddsidemargin by -\\textwidth\n \\divide\\oddsidemargin by 2\\relax\n \\advance\\oddsidemargin by -1in\\relax\n \\advance\\oddsidemargin by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken o\\relax\n \\oddsidemargin\\paperwidth\n \\advance\\oddsidemargin by -\\textwidth\n \\advance\\oddsidemargin by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n \\advance\\oddsidemargin by -1in\\relax\n\\else\n \\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken i\\relax\n \\else\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Unknown mode type `\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro' in \\string\\IEEEsetsidemargin\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `i'}%\n {Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEsetsidemargin\\space are: i, o, c and a.}%\n \\fi\n \\oddsidemargin\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n \\advance\\oddsidemargin by -1in\\relax\n\\fi\\fi\\fi\n% odd and even side margins both mean \"inner\" for single sided pages\n\\evensidemargin\\oddsidemargin\n% but are mirrors of each other when twosided is in effect\n\\if@twoside\n \\evensidemargin\\paperwidth\n \\advance\\evensidemargin by -\\textwidth\n \\advance\\evensidemargin by -\\oddsidemargin\n % have to compensate for both the builtin 1in LaTex offset\n % and the fact we already subtracted this offset from \\oddsidemargin\n \\advance\\evensidemargin -2in\\relax\n\\fi}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\IEEEsettextheight[sample text]{top text margin}{bottom text margin}\n% Sets \\textheight based on the specified top margin and bottom margin.\n% Takes into consideration \\paperheight, \\topskip, and (by default) the\n% the actual height and depth of the \\IEEEdefaultsampletext text. \n\\def\\IEEEsettextheight{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@IEEEsettextheight}{\\@IEEEsettextheight[\\IEEEdefaultsampletext]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEsettextheight[#1]#2#3{\\textheight\\paperheight\\relax\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA #2\\relax\n \\advance \\textheight by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA% subtract top margin\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA #3\\relax\n \\advance \\textheight by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA% subtract bottom margin\n \\advance \\textheight by \\topskip% add \\topskip\n % subtract off everything above the top, and below the bottom, baselines\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance \\textheight by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance \\textheight by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\n\n\n\n\\newdimen\\IEEEquantizedlength\n\\IEEEquantizedlength 0sp\\relax\n\\newdimen\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff\n\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff 0sp\\relax\n\\def\\IEEEquantizedlengthint{0}\n\n% usage: \\IEEEquantizelength{mode: d, c, i}{base unit}{length}\n% Sets the length \\IEEEquantizedlength to be an integer multiple of the given\n% (nonzero) base unit such that \\IEEEquantizedlength approximates the given\n% length.\n% \\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff is a length equal to the difference between the\n% \\IEEEquantizedlength and the given length.\n% \\IEEEquantizedlengthint is a macro containing the integer number of base units\n% in \\IEEEquantizedlength.\n% i.e., \\IEEEquantizedlength = \\IEEEquantizedlengthint * base unit\n% The mode determines how \\IEEEquantizedlength is quantized:\n% d = always decrease (always round down \\IEEEquantizeint)\n% c = use the closest match\n% i = always increase (always round up \\IEEEquantizeint)\n% In anycase, if the given length is already quantized,\n% \\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff will be set to zero.\n\\def\\IEEEquantizelength#1#2#3{\\begingroup\n% work in isolation so as not to externally disturb the \\@IEEEtrantmp\n% variables\n% load the argument values indirectly via \\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff\n% in case the user refers to our \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenX, \\IEEEquantizedlength,\n% etc. in the arguments. we also will work with these as counters,\n% i.e., in sp units\n% A has the base unit\n\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff #2\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff\n% B has the input length\n\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff #3\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA sp\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB sp\\relax\n% \\@IEEEtrantmpcountC will have the quantized int\n% \\IEEEquantizedlength will have the quantized length\n% \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC will have the quantized diff\n% initialize them to zero as this is what will be\n% exported if an error occurs\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC 0\\relax\n\\IEEEquantizedlength 0sp\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC 0sp\\relax\n% extract mode\n\\@IEEEextracttoken{#1}\\relax\n% check for mode errors\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\\@empty\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Empty mode type in \\string\\IEEEquantizelength\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `d'}{Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEquantizelength\\space are: d, c and i.}\\relax\n \\let\\@IEEEextractedtoken=d\\relax\n \\def\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro{d}\\relax\n\\else\n \\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\@empty\\else\n \\typeout{** WARNING: \\string\\IEEEquantizelength\\space mode specifiers after the first in `\\@IEEEextracttokenarg' ignored (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\relax\n \\fi\n\\fi\n% check for base unit is zero error\n\\ifnum\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA=0\\relax\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Base unit is zero in \\string\\IEEEquantizelength\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n \\string\\IEEEquantizedlength\\space and \\string\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff\\space are set to zero}{Division by zero is not allowed.}\\relax\n\\else% base unit is nonzero\n % \\@IEEEtrantmpcountC carries the number of integer units\n % in the quantized length (integer length \\ base)\n \\@IEEEtrantmpcountC\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB\\relax\n \\divide\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC by \\@IEEEtrantmpcountA\\relax\n % \\IEEEquantizedlength has the (rounded down) quantized length\n % = base * int\n \\IEEEquantizedlength\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n \\multiply\\IEEEquantizedlength by \\@IEEEtrantmpcountC\\relax\n % \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC has the difference\n % = quantized length - length\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\\IEEEquantizedlength\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax\n % trap special case of length being already quantized\n % to avoid a roundup under i option\n \\ifdim\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC=0sp\\relax\n \\else % length not is already quantized\n % set dimenA to carry the upper quantized (absolute value) difference:\n % quantizedlength + base - length\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by \\IEEEquantizedlength\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax\n % set dimenB to carry the lower quantized (absolute value) difference:\n % length - quantizedlength\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\IEEEquantizedlength\\relax\n % handle each mode\n \\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken c\\relax\n % compare upper and lower amounts, select upper if lower > upper\n \\ifdim\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB>\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n % use upper\n \\advance\\IEEEquantizedlength by \\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA sp\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC by 1\\relax\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n \\else% <=. uselower\n % no need to do anything for lower, use output values already setup\n \\fi\n \\else% not mode c\n \\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken i\\relax\n % always round up under i mode\n \\advance\\IEEEquantizedlength by \\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA sp\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC by 1\\relax\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n \\else\n \\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken d\\relax\n \\else\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Unknown mode type `\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro' in \\string\\IEEEquantizelength\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `d'}%\n {Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEquantizelength\\space are: d, c, and i.}\\relax\n \\fi % if d\n % no need to do anything for d, use output values already setup\n \\fi\\fi % if i, c\n \\fi % if length is already quantized\n\\fi% if base unit is zero\n% globally assign the results to macros we use here to escape the enclosing\n% group without needing to call \\global on any of the \\@IEEEtrantmp variables.\n% \\@IEEEtrantmpcountC has the quantized int\n% \\IEEEquantizedlength has the quantized length\n% \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC has the quantized diff\n\\xdef\\@IEEEquantizedlengthintmacro{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC}\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC\\IEEEquantizedlength\\relax\n\\xdef\\@IEEEquantizedlengthmacro{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC}\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\\relax\n\\xdef\\@IEEEquantizedlengthdiffmacro{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC}\\relax\n\\endgroup\n% locally assign the outputs here from the macros\n\\expandafter\\IEEEquantizedlength\\@IEEEquantizedlengthmacro sp\\relax\n\\expandafter\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff\\@IEEEquantizedlengthdiffmacro sp\\relax\n\\edef\\IEEEquantizedlengthint{\\@IEEEquantizedlengthintmacro}\\relax}\n\n\n\n\\newdimen\\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff\n\\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff 0sp\\relax\n\n% usage: \\IEEEquantizetextheight[base unit]{mode: d, c, i}\n% Sets \\textheight to be an integer multiple of the current \\baselineskip\n% (or the optionally specified base unit) plus the first (\\topskip) line.\n% \\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff is a length equal to the difference between\n% the new quantized and original \\textheight.\n% \\IEEEquantizedtextheightlpc is a macro containing the integer number of\n% lines per column under the quantized \\textheight. i.e.,\n% \\textheight = \\IEEEquantizedtextheightlpc * \\baselineskip + \\topskip\n% The mode determines how \\textheight is quantized:\n% d = always decrease (always round down the number of lines per column)\n% c = use the closest match\n% i = always increase (always round up the number of lines per column)\n% In anycase, if \\textheight is already quantized, it will remain unchanged,\n% and \\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff will be set to zero.\n% Depends on: \\IEEEquantizelength\n\\def\\IEEEquantizetextheight{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@IEEEquantizetextheight}{\\@IEEEquantizetextheight[\\baselineskip]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEquantizetextheight[#1]#2{\\begingroup\n% use our \\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff as a scratch pad\n% we need to subtract off \\topskip before quantization\n\\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff\\textheight\n\\advance\\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff by -\\topskip\\relax\n\\IEEEquantizelength{#2}{#1}{\\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff}\n% add back \\topskip line\n\\advance\\IEEEquantizedlength by \\topskip\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC\\IEEEquantizedlengthint\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC by 1\\relax\n% globally assign the results to macros we use here to escape the enclosing\n% group without needing to call \\global on any of the \\@IEEEtrantmp variables.\n\\xdef\\@IEEEquantizedtextheightlpcmacro{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC}\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC\\IEEEquantizedlength\\relax\n\\xdef\\@IEEEquantizedtextheightmacro{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC}\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC\\IEEEquantizedlengthdiff\\relax\n\\xdef\\@IEEEquantizedtextheightdiffmacro{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountC}\\relax\n\\endgroup\n% locally assign the outputs here from the macros\n\\textheight\\@IEEEquantizedtextheightmacro sp\\relax\n\\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff\\@IEEEquantizedtextheightdiffmacro sp\\relax\n\\edef\\IEEEquantizedtextheightlpc{\\@IEEEquantizedtextheightlpcmacro}}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\IEEEsettopmargin[sample text]{mode: t, b, c, a, q}{margin/offset}\n% Sets \\topmargin based on the specified vertical margin.\n% Takes into consideration the base 1in offset, \\headheight, \\headsep,\n% \\topskip, and (by default) the the actual height (or, for the bottom, depth)\n% of the \\IEEEdefaultsampletext text.\n% The available modes are:\n% t = top margin\n% b = bottom margin\n% c = vertically centered, with the given offset\n% a = adjust the vertical margins using the given offset\n% q = adjust the margins using \\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff and the given offset\n% For the offsets, positive values increase the top margin.\n% \\headheight, \\headsep, \\topskip and \\textheight should be set properly for the\n% given margins before calling this function.\n\\def\\IEEEsettopmargin{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@IEEEsettopmargin}{\\@IEEEsettopmargin[\\IEEEdefaultsampletext]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEsettopmargin[#1]#2#3{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA #3\\relax\n\\@IEEEextracttoken{#2}\\relax\n% check for mode errors\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\\@empty\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Empty mode type in \\string\\IEEEsettopmargin\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `t'}{Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEsettopmargin\\space are: t, b, c, a and q.}\\relax\n \\let\\@IEEEextractedtoken=t\\relax\n \\def\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro{t}\\relax\n\\else\n \\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\@empty\\else\n \\typeout{** WARNING: \\string\\IEEEsettopmargin\\space mode specifiers after the first in `\\@IEEEextracttokenarg' ignored (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\relax\n \\fi\n\\fi\n% handle each mode\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken a\\relax\n \\advance\\topmargin by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken q\\relax\n % we need to adjust by half the \\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff value\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff\\relax\n \\divide\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by 2\\relax\n % a positive \\IEEEquantizedtextheightdiff means we need to reduce \\topmargin\n % because \\textheight has been lenghtened\n \\advance\\topmargin by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax\n \\advance\\topmargin by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken c\\relax\n \\topmargin\\paperheight\n \\advance\\topmargin by -\\textheight\n % \\textheight includes \\topskip, but we should not count topskip whitespace here, backout\n \\advance \\topmargin by \\topskip\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\topmargin by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\topmargin by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax\n \\divide\\topmargin by 2\\relax\n \\advance\\topmargin by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken b\\relax\n \\topmargin\\paperheight\n \\advance\\topmargin by -\\textheight\n % \\textheight includes \\topskip, but we should not count topskip whitespace here, backout\n \\advance \\topmargin by \\topskip\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\topmargin by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax\n \\advance\\topmargin by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\else\n \\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken t\\relax\n \\else\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Unknown mode type `\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro' in \\string\\IEEEsettopmargin\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `t'}%\n {Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEsettopmargin\\space are: t, b, c, a and q.}\\relax\n \\fi\n \\topmargin\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\topmargin by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax\n\\fi\\fi % if t, b, c\n% convert desired top margin into actual \\topmargin\n% this is not done for the q or a modes because they are only adjustments\n\\advance \\topmargin by -\\topskip\n\\advance \\topmargin by -1in\n\\advance \\topmargin by -\\headheight\n\\advance \\topmargin by -\\headsep\n\\fi\\fi % if q, a\n}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\IEEEsetheadermargin[header sample][text sample]{mode: t, b, c, a}{margin/offset}\n% Differentially adjusts \\topmargin and \\headsep (such that their sum is unchanged)\n% based on the specified header margin.\n% Takes into consideration the base 1in offset, \\headheight, \\topskip, and (by default)\n% the actual height (or depth) of the \\IEEEdefaultheadersampletext and\n% \\IEEEdefaultsampletext text.\n% The available modes are:\n% t = top margin (top of the header text to the top of the page)\n% b = bottom margin (bottom of the header text to the top of the main text)\n% c = vertically centered between the main text and the top of the page,\n% with the given offset\n% a = adjust the vertical position using the given offset\n% For the offsets, positive values move the header downward.\n% \\headheight, \\headsep, \\topskip and \\topmargin should be set properly before\n% calling this function.\n\\def\\IEEEsetheadermargin{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@IEEEsetheadermargin}{\\@IEEEsetheadermargin[\\IEEEdefaultheadersampletext]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEsetheadermargin[#1]{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@@IEEEsetheadermargin[#1]}{\\@@IEEEsetheadermargin[#1][\\IEEEdefaultsampletext]}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEsetheadermargin[#1][#2]#3#4{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA #4\\relax\n\\@IEEEextracttoken{#3}\\relax\n% check for mode errors\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\\@empty\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Empty mode type in \\string\\IEEEsetheadermargin\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `t'}{Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEsetheadermargin\\space are: t, b, c, and a.}\\relax\n \\let\\@IEEEextractedtoken=t\\relax\n \\def\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro{t}\\relax\n\\else\n \\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\@empty\\else\n \\typeout{** WARNING: \\string\\IEEEsetheadermargin\\space mode specifiers after the first in `\\@IEEEextracttokenarg' ignored (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\relax\n \\fi\n\\fi\n% handle each mode\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken a\\relax\n % No need to do anything here and can pass through the adjustment\n % value as is. The end adjustment of \\topmargin and \\headsep will\n % do all that is needed\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken c\\relax\n % get the bottom margin\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\headsep\\relax\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by \\topskip\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #2\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n % at this point \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB has the actual header bottom margin\n % subtract from it the top header margin\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB -1in\\relax % take into consideration the system 1in offset of the top margin\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\topmargin\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\headheight\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n % at this point \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB has the difference between the bottom and top margins\n % we need to adjust by half this amount to center the header\n \\divide\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by 2\\relax\n % and add to offset\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken b\\relax\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\headsep\\relax\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by \\topskip\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #2\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n % at this point \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB has the actual header bottom margin\n % get the difference between the actual and the desired\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\else\n \\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken t\\relax\n \\else\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Unknown mode type `\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro' in \\string\\IEEEsetheadermargin\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `t'}%\n {Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEsetheadermargin\\space are: t, b, c and a.}\\relax\n \\fi\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB 1in\\relax % take into consideration the system 1in offset of the top margin\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by \\topmargin\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by \\headheight\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n % at this point \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB has the actual header top margin\n % get the difference between the desired and the actual\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\fi\\fi % if t, b, c\n\\fi % if a\n% advance \\topmargin by the needed amount and reduce \\headsep by the same\n% so as not to disturb the location of the main text\n\\advance\\topmargin by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n\\advance\\headsep by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\IEEEsetfootermargin[footer sample][text sample]{mode: t, b, c, a}{margin/offset}\n% Adjusts \\footskip based on the specified footer margin.\n% Takes into consideration the base 1in offset, \\paperheight, \\headheight,\n% \\headsep, \\textheight and (by default) the actual height (or depth) of the\n% \\IEEEdefaultfootersampletext and \\IEEEdefaultsampletext text.\n% The available modes are:\n% t = top margin (top of the footer text to the bottom of the main text)\n% b = bottom margin (bottom of the footer text to the bottom of page)\n% c = vertically centered between the main text and the bottom of the page,\n% with the given offset\n% a = adjust the vertical position using the given offset\n% For the offsets, positive values move the footer downward.\n% \\headheight, \\headsep, \\topskip, \\topmargin, and \\textheight should be set\n% properly before calling this function.\n\\def\\IEEEsetfootermargin{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@IEEEsetfootermargin}{\\@IEEEsetfootermargin[\\IEEEdefaultfootersampletext]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEsetfootermargin[#1]{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@@IEEEsetfootermargin[#1]}{\\@@IEEEsetfootermargin[#1][\\IEEEdefaultsampletext]}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEsetfootermargin[#1][#2]#3#4{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA #4\\relax\n\\@IEEEextracttoken{#3}\\relax\n% check for mode errors\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\\@empty\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Empty mode type in \\string\\IEEEsetfootermargin\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `t'}{Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEsetfootermargin\\space are: t, b, c, and a.}\\relax\n \\let\\@IEEEextractedtoken=t\\relax\n \\def\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro{t}\\relax\n\\else\n \\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\@empty\\else\n \\typeout{** WARNING: \\string\\IEEEsetfootermargin\\space mode specifiers after the first in `\\@IEEEextracttokenarg' ignored (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\relax\n \\fi\n\\fi\n% handle each mode\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken a\\relax\n % No need to do anything here and can pass through the adjustment\n % value as is. The end adjustment of \\footskip will do all that\n % is needed\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken c\\relax\n % calculate the bottom margin\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB 1in\\relax % system 1in offset\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\topmargin\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\headheight\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\headsep\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\textheight\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\footskip\\relax\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\paperheight\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n % at this point \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB has the actual footer bottom margin\n % now subtract off the footer top margin\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB -\\footskip\\relax\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #2\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n % at this point \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB has the difference between the bottom\n % and top footer margins\n % our adjustment must be half this value to center the footer\n \\divide\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by 2\\relax\n % add to the offset\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken b\\relax\n % calculate the bottom margin\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB 1in\\relax % system 1in offset\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\topmargin\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\headheight\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\headsep\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\textheight\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\footskip\\relax\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\paperheight\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n % at this point \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB has the actual footer bottom margin\n % get the difference between the actual and the desired\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\else\n \\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken t\\relax\n \\else\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Unknown mode type `\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro' in \\string\\IEEEsetfootermargin\\space (line \\the\\inputlineno).\\MessageBreak\n Defaulting to `t'}%\n {Valid modes for \\string\\IEEEsetfootermargin\\space are: t, b, c and a.}\\relax\n \\fi\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\footskip\\relax\n \\settodepth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #2\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n \\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC}{\\begingroup #1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenC\n % at this point \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB has the actual footer top margin\n % get the difference between the desired and the actual\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by -\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\n\\fi\\fi % if t, b, c\n\\fi % if a\n% advance \\footskip by the needed amount\n\\advance\\footskip by \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax\n}\n\n% -- End V1.8a page setup commands --\n\n\n\n\n\n% V1.6\n% LaTeX is a little to quick to use hyphenations\n% So, we increase the penalty for their use and raise\n% the badness level that triggers an underfull hbox\n% warning. The author may still have to tweak things,\n% but the appearance will be much better \"right out\n% of the box\" than that under V1.5 and prior.\n% TeX default is 50\n\\hyphenpenalty=750\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\hyphenpenalty 500\n\\fi\n% If we didn't adjust the interword spacing, 2200 might be better.\n% The TeX default is 1000\n\\hbadness=1350\n% The IEEE does not use extra spacing after punctuation\n\\frenchspacing\n\n% V1.7 increase this a tad to discourage equation breaks\n\\binoppenalty=1000 % default 700\n\\relpenalty=800 % default 500\n\n% v1.8a increase these to discourage widows and orphans\n\\clubpenalty=1000 % default 150\n\\widowpenalty=1000 % default 150\n\\displaywidowpenalty=1000 % default 50\n\n\n% margin note stuff\n\\marginparsep 10pt\n\\marginparwidth 20pt\n\\marginparpush 25pt\n\n\n% if things get too close, go ahead and let them touch\n\\lineskip 0pt\n\\normallineskip 0pt\n\\lineskiplimit 0pt\n\\normallineskiplimit 0pt\n\n% The distance from the lower edge of the text body to the\n% footline\n\\footskip 0.4in\n\n% normally zero, should be relative to font height.\n% put in a little rubber to help stop some bad breaks (underfull vboxes)\n\\parskip 0ex plus 0.2ex minus 0.1ex\n\n\\parindent 1.0em\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\parindent 1.5em\n\\fi\n\n\\headheight 12pt\n\\headsep 18pt\n% use the normal font baselineskip\n% so that \\topskip is unaffected by changes in \\baselinestretch\n\\topskip=\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\n\n\n% V1.8 \\maxdepth defaults to 4pt, but should be font size dependent\n\\maxdepth=0.5\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\n\\textheight 58pc % 9.63in, 696pt\n\n% set the default top margin to 58pt\n% which results in a \\topmargin of -49.59pt for 10pt documents\n\\IEEEsettopmargin{t}{58pt}\n% tweak textheight to a perfect integer number of lines/column.\n% standard is: 9pt/63 lpc; 10pt/58 lpc; 11pt/52 lpc; 12pt/50 lpc\n\\IEEEquantizetextheight{c}\n% tweak top margin so that the error is shared equally at the top and bottom\n\\IEEEsettopmargin{q}{0sp}\n\n\n\\columnsep 1pc\n\\textwidth 43pc % 2 x 21pc + 1pc = 43pc\n\n% set the default side margins to center the text\n\\IEEEsetsidemargin{c}{0pt}\n\n\n% adjust margins for default conference mode\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n \\textheight 9.25in % The standard for conferences (668.4975pt)\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{t}{0.75in}\n % tweak textheight to a perfect integer number of lines/page.\n % standard is: 9pt/61 lpc; 10pt/56 lpc; 11pt/50 lpc; 12pt/48 lpc\n \\IEEEquantizetextheight{c}\n % tweak top margin so that the error is shared equally at the top and bottom\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{q}{0sp}\n\\fi\n\n\n% compsoc text sizes, margins and spacings\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\columnsep 12bp\n % CS specs for \\textwdith are 6.875in\n % \\textwidth 6.875in\n % however, measurements from proofs show they are using 3.5in columns\n \\textwidth 7in\n \\advance\\textwidth by \\columnsep\n % set the side margins to center the text\n \\IEEEsetsidemargin{c}{0pt}\n % top/bottom margins to center\n % could just set \\textheight to 9.75in for all the different paper sizes\n % and then quantize, but we'll do it the long way here to allow for easy\n % future per-paper size adjustments\n \\IEEEsettextheight{0.625in}{0.625in}% 11in - 2 * 0.625in = 9.75in is the standard text height for compsoc journals\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{t}{0.625in}\n \\if@IEEEusingcspaper\n \\IEEEsettextheight{0.5in}{0.5in}% 10.75in - 2 * 0.5in = 9.75in\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{t}{0.5in}\n \\fi\n \\if@IEEEusingAfourpaper\n \\IEEEsettextheight{24.675mm}{24.675mm}% 297mm - 2 * 24.675mm = 247.650mm (9.75in)\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{t}{24.675mm}\n \\fi\n % tweak textheight to a perfect integer number of lines/page.\n % standard is: 9pt/65 lpc; 10pt/61 lpc; 11pt/53 lpc; 12pt/49 lpc\n \\IEEEquantizetextheight{c}\n % tweak top margin so that the error is shared equally at the top and bottom\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{q}{0sp}\n\n% compsoc conference\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n % compsoc conference use a larger value for columnsep\n \\columnsep 0.25in\n \\IEEEsettextwidth{0.75in}{0.75in}\n % set the side margins to center the text (0.75in for letterpaper)\n \\IEEEsetsidemargin{c}{0pt}\n % compsoc conferences want 1in top and bottom margin\n \\IEEEsettextheight{1in}{1in}\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{t}{1in}\n % tweak textheight to a perfect integer number of lines/page.\n % standard is: 9pt/58 lpc; 10pt/53 lpc; 11pt/48 lpc; 12pt/46 lpc\n \\IEEEquantizetextheight{c}\n % tweak top margin so that the error is shared equally at the top and bottom\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{q}{0sp}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% draft mode settings override that of all other modes\n% provides a nice 1in margin all around the paper and extra\n% space between the lines for editor's comments\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls\n % we want 1in side margins regardless of paper type\n \\IEEEsettextwidth{1in}{1in}\n \\IEEEsetsidemargin{c}{0pt}\n % want 1in top and bottom margins\n \\IEEEsettextheight{1in}{1in}\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{t}{1in}\n % digitize textheight to be an integer number of lines.\n % this may cause the top and bottom margins to be off a tad\n \\IEEEquantizetextheight{c}\n % tweak top margin so that the error is shared equally at the top and bottom\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{q}{0sp}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% process CLASSINPUT inner/outer margin\n% if inner margin defined, but outer margin not, set outer to inner.\n\\ifx\\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin\\@IEEEundefined\n\\else\n \\ifx\\CLASSINPUToutersidemargin\\@IEEEundefined\n \\edef\\CLASSINPUToutersidemargin{\\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\\ifx\\CLASSINPUToutersidemargin\\@IEEEundefined\n\\else\n % if outer margin defined, but inner margin not, set inner to outer.\n \\ifx\\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin\\@IEEEundefined\n \\edef\\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin{\\CLASSINPUToutersidemargin}\n \\fi\n \\IEEEsettextwidth{\\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin}{\\CLASSINPUToutersidemargin}\n \\IEEEsetsidemargin{i}{\\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin}\n \\typeout{** ATTENTION: Overriding inner side margin to \\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin\\space and \n outer side margin to \\CLASSINPUToutersidemargin\\space via \\string\\CLASSINPUT.}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% process CLASSINPUT top/bottom text margin\n% if toptext margin defined, but bottomtext margin not, set bottomtext to toptext margin\n\\ifx\\CLASSINPUTtoptextmargin\\@IEEEundefined\n\\else\n \\ifx\\CLASSINPUTbottomtextmargin\\@IEEEundefined\n \\edef\\CLASSINPUTbottomtextmargin{\\CLASSINPUTtoptextmargin}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\\ifx\\CLASSINPUTbottomtextmargin\\@IEEEundefined\n\\else\n % if bottomtext margin defined, but toptext margin not, set toptext to bottomtext margin\n \\ifx\\CLASSINPUTtoptextmargin\\@IEEEundefined\n \\edef\\CLASSINPUTtoptextmargin{\\CLASSINPUTbottomtextmargin}\n \\fi\n \\IEEEsettextheight{\\CLASSINPUTtoptextmargin}{\\CLASSINPUTbottomtextmargin}\n \\IEEEsettopmargin{t}{\\CLASSINPUTtoptextmargin}\n \\typeout{** ATTENTION: Overriding top text margin to \\CLASSINPUTtoptextmargin\\space and \n bottom text margin to \\CLASSINPUTbottomtextmargin\\space via \\string\\CLASSINPUT.}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% default to center header and footer text in the margins\n\\IEEEsetheadermargin{c}{0pt}\n\\IEEEsetfootermargin{c}{0pt}\n\n% adjust header and footer positions for compsoc journals\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONjournal\n \\IEEEsetheadermargin{b}{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}\n \\IEEEsetfootermargin{t}{\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\n% V1.8a display lines per column info message on user's console\n\\def\\IEEEdisplayinfolinespercolumn{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=\\textheight\n% topskip represents only one line even if > baselineskip\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by -1\\topskip\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA=\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB=\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n\\divide\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB by \\baselineskip\n% need to add one line to include topskip (first) line\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB by 1\n% save lines per column value as text\n\\edef\\@IEEEnumlinespercolumninfotxt{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB}\n% backout topskip advance to allow direct \\@IEEEtrantmpcountA comparison\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB by -1\n% restore value as text height (without topskip) rather than just as number of lines\n\\multiply\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB by \\baselineskip\n% is the column height an integer number of lines per column?\n\\ifnum\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA=\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB\n\\edef\\@IEEEnumlinespercolumnexactinfotxt{exact}\n\\else\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA sp\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by -\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB sp\\relax\n\\edef\\@IEEEnumlinespercolumnexactinfotxt{approximate, difference = \\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\n\\fi\n\\typeout{-- Lines per column: \\@IEEEnumlinespercolumninfotxt\\space (\\@IEEEnumlinespercolumnexactinfotxt).}}\n% delay execution till start of document to allow for user changes\n\\AtBeginDocument{\\IEEEdisplayinfolinespercolumn}\n\n\n\n% LIST SPACING CONTROLS\n\n% Controls the amount of EXTRA spacing\n% above and below \\trivlist \n% Both \\list and IED lists override this.\n% However, \\trivlist will use this as will most\n% things built from \\trivlist like the \\center\n% environment.\n\\topsep 0.5\\baselineskip\n\n% Controls the additional spacing around lists preceded\n% or followed by blank lines. the IEEE does not increase\n% spacing before or after paragraphs so it is set to zero.\n% \\z@ is the same as zero, but faster.\n\\partopsep \\z@\n\n% Controls the spacing between paragraphs in lists. \n% The IEEE does not increase spacing before or after paragraphs\n% so this is also zero. \n% With IEEEtran.cls, global changes to\n% this value DO affect lists (but not IED lists).\n\\parsep \\z@\n\n% Controls the extra spacing between list items. \n% The IEEE does not put extra spacing between items.\n% With IEEEtran.cls, global changes to this value DO affect\n% lists (but not IED lists).\n\\itemsep \\z@\n\n% \\itemindent is the amount to indent the FIRST line of a list\n% item. It is auto set to zero within the \\list environment. To alter\n% it, you have to do so when you call the \\list.\n% However, the IEEE uses this for the theorem environment\n% There is an alternative value for this near \\leftmargini below\n\\itemindent -1em\n\n% \\leftmargin, the spacing from the left margin of the main text to\n% the left of the main body of a list item is set by \\list.\n% Hence this statement does nothing for lists.\n% But, quote and verse do use it for indention.\n\\leftmargin 2em\n\n% we retain this stuff from the older IEEEtran.cls so that \\list\n% will work the same way as before. However, itemize, enumerate and\n% description (IED) could care less about what these are as they\n% all are overridden.\n\\leftmargini 2em\n%\\itemindent 2em % Alternative values: sometimes used.\n%\\leftmargini 0em\n\\leftmarginii 1em\n\\leftmarginiii 1.5em\n\\leftmarginiv 1.5em\n\\leftmarginv 1.0em\n\\leftmarginvi 1.0em\n\\labelsep 0.5em \n\\labelwidth \\z@\n\n\n% The old IEEEtran.cls behavior of \\list is retained.\n% However, the new V1.3 IED list environments override all the\n% @list stuff (\\@listX is called within \\list for the\n% appropriate level just before the user's list_decl is called). \n% \\topsep is now 2pt as the IEEE puts a little extra space around\n% lists - used by those non-IED macros that depend on \\list.\n% Note that \\parsep and \\itemsep are not redefined as in \n% the sizexx.clo \\@listX (which article.cls uses) so global changes\n% of these values DO affect \\list\n% \n\\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini \\topsep 2pt plus 1pt minus 1pt}\n\\let\\@listI\\@listi\n\\def\\@listii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\\labelwidth\\leftmarginii%\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep \\topsep 2pt}\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\\labelwidth\\leftmarginiii%\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep \\topsep 2pt}\n\\def\\@listiv{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiv\\labelwidth\\leftmarginiv%\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep \\topsep 2pt}\n\\def\\@listv{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginv\\labelwidth\\leftmarginv%\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep \\topsep 2pt}\n\\def\\@listvi{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginvi\\labelwidth\\leftmarginvi%\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep \\topsep 2pt}\n\n\n% The IEEE uses 5) not 5.\n\\def\\labelenumi{\\theenumi)} \\def\\theenumi{\\arabic{enumi}}\n\n% The IEEE uses a) not (a)\n\\def\\labelenumii{\\theenumii)} \\def\\theenumii{\\alph{enumii}}\n\n% The IEEE uses iii) not iii.\n\\def\\labelenumiii{\\theenumiii)} \\def\\theenumiii{\\roman{enumiii}}\n\n% The IEEE uses A) not A.\n\\def\\labelenumiv{\\theenumiv)} \\def\\theenumiv{\\Alph{enumiv}}\n\n% exactly the same as in article.cls\n\\def\\p@enumii{\\theenumi}\n\\def\\p@enumiii{\\theenumi(\\theenumii)}\n\\def\\p@enumiv{\\p@enumiii\\theenumiii}\n\n% itemized list label styles\n\\def\\labelitemi{$\\scriptstyle\\bullet$}\n\\def\\labelitemii{\\textbf{--}}\n\\def\\labelitemiii{$\\ast$}\n\\def\\labelitemiv{$\\cdot$}\n\n\n\n% **** V1.3 ENHANCEMENTS ****\n% Itemize, Enumerate and Description (IED) List Controls\n% ***************************\n% \n% \n% The IEEE seems to use at least two different values by\n% which ITEMIZED list labels are indented to the right\n% For The Journal of Lightwave Technology (JLT) and The Journal\n% on Selected Areas in Communications (JSAC), they tend to use\n% an indention equal to \\parindent. For Transactions on Communications\n% they tend to indent ITEMIZED lists a little more--- 1.3\\parindent.\n% We'll provide both values here for you so that you can choose \n% which one you like in your document using a command such as:\n% setlength{\\IEEEilabelindent}{\\IEEEilabelindentB}\n\\newdimen\\IEEEilabelindentA\n\\IEEEilabelindentA \\parindent\n\n\\newdimen\\IEEEilabelindentB\n\\IEEEilabelindentB 1.3\\parindent\n% However, we'll default to using \\parindent\n% which makes more sense to me\n\\newdimen\\IEEEilabelindent\n\\IEEEilabelindent \\IEEEilabelindentA\n\n\n% This controls the default amount the enumerated list labels\n% are indented to the right.\n% Normally, this is the same as the paragraph indention\n\\newdimen\\IEEEelabelindent\n\\IEEEelabelindent \\parindent\n\n% This controls the default amount the description list labels\n% are indented to the right.\n% Normally, this is the same as the paragraph indention\n\\newdimen\\IEEEdlabelindent\n\\IEEEdlabelindent \\parindent\n\n% This is the value actually used within the IED lists.\n% The IED environments automatically set its value to\n% one of the three values above, so global changes do \n% not have any effect\n\\newdimen\\IEEElabelindent\n\\IEEElabelindent \\parindent\n\n% The actual amount labels will be indented is\n% \\IEEElabelindent multiplied by the factor below\n% corresponding to the level of nesting depth\n% This provides a means by which the user can\n% alter the effective \\IEEElabelindent for deeper\n% levels\n% There may not be such a thing as correct \"standard IEEE\"\n% values. What the IEEE actually does may depend on the specific\n% circumstances.\n% The first list level almost always has full indention.\n% The second levels I've seen have only 75% of the normal indentation\n% Three level or greater nestings are very rare. I am guessing\n% that they don't use any indentation.\n\\def\\IEEElabelindentfactori{1.0} % almost always one\n\\def\\IEEElabelindentfactorii{0.75} % 0.0 or 1.0 may be used in some cases\n\\def\\IEEElabelindentfactoriii{0.0} % 0.75? 0.5? 0.0?\n\\def\\IEEElabelindentfactoriv{0.0}\n\\def\\IEEElabelindentfactorv{0.0}\n\\def\\IEEElabelindentfactorvi{0.0}\n\n% value actually used within IED lists, it is auto\n% set to one of the 6 values above\n% global changes here have no effect\n\\def\\IEEElabelindentfactor{1.0}\n\n% This controls the default spacing between the end of the IED\n% list labels and the list text, when normal text is used for\n% the labels.\n% compsoc uses a larger value here, but we'll set that later\n% in the class so that this code block area can be extracted\n% as-is for IEEEtrantools.sty\n\\newdimen\\IEEEiednormlabelsep\n\\IEEEiednormlabelsep 0.6em\n\n% This controls the default spacing between the end of the IED\n% list labels and the list text, when math symbols are used for\n% the labels (nomenclature lists). The IEEE usually increases the \n% spacing in these cases\n\\newdimen\\IEEEiedmathlabelsep\n\\IEEEiedmathlabelsep 1.2em\n\n% This controls the extra vertical separation put above and\n% below each IED list. the IEEE usually puts a little extra spacing\n% around each list. However, this spacing is barely noticeable.\n% compsoc uses a larger value here, but we'll set that later\n% in the class so that this code block area can be extracted\n% as-is for IEEEtrantools.sty\n\\newskip\\IEEEiedtopsep\n\\IEEEiedtopsep 2pt plus 1pt minus 1pt\n\n\n% This command is executed within each IED list environment\n% at the beginning of the list. You can use this to set the \n% parameters for some/all your IED list(s) without disturbing \n% global parameters that affect things other than lists.\n% i.e., renewcommand{\\IEEEiedlistdecl}{\\setlength{\\labelsep}{5em}}\n% will alter the \\labelsep for the next list(s) until \n% \\IEEEiedlistdecl is redefined. \n\\def\\IEEEiedlistdecl{\\relax}\n\n% This command provides an easy way to set \\leftmargin based\n% on the \\labelwidth, \\labelsep and the argument \\IEEElabelindent\n% Usage: \\IEEEcalcleftmargin{width-to-indent-the-label}\n% output is in the \\leftmargin variable, i.e., effectively:\n% \\leftmargin = argument + \\labelwidth + \\labelsep\n% Note controlled spacing here, shield end of lines with %\n\\def\\IEEEcalcleftmargin#1{\\setlength{\\leftmargin}{#1}%\n\\addtolength{\\leftmargin}{\\labelwidth}%\n\\addtolength{\\leftmargin}{\\labelsep}}\n\n% This command provides an easy way to set \\labelwidth to the\n% width of the given text. It is the same as\n% \\settowidth{\\labelwidth}{label-text}\n% and useful as a shorter alternative.\n% Typically used to set \\labelwidth to be the width\n% of the longest label in the list\n\\def\\IEEEsetlabelwidth#1{\\settowidth{\\labelwidth}{#1}}\n\n% When this command is executed, IED lists will use the \n% IEEEiedmathlabelsep label separation rather than the normal\n% spacing. To have an effect, this command must be executed via\n% the \\IEEEiedlistdecl or within the option of the IED list\n% environments.\n\\def\\IEEEusemathlabelsep{\\setlength{\\labelsep}{\\IEEEiedmathlabelsep}}\n\n% A flag which controls whether the IED lists automatically\n% calculate \\leftmargin from \\IEEElabelindent, \\labelwidth and \\labelsep\n% Useful if you want to specify your own \\leftmargin\n% This flag must be set (\\IEEEnocalcleftmargintrue or \\IEEEnocalcleftmarginfalse) \n% via the \\IEEEiedlistdecl or within the option of the IED list\n% environments to have an effect.\n\\newif\\ifIEEEnocalcleftmargin\n\\IEEEnocalcleftmarginfalse\n\n% A flag which controls whether \\IEEElabelindent is multiplied by\n% the \\IEEElabelindentfactor for each list level.\n% This flag must be set via the \\IEEEiedlistdecl or within the option \n% of the IED list environments to have an effect.\n\\newif\\ifIEEEnolabelindentfactor\n\\IEEEnolabelindentfactorfalse\n\n\n% internal variable to indicate type of IED label\n% justification\n% 0 - left; 1 - center; 2 - right\n\\def\\@IEEEiedjustify{0}\n\n\n% commands to allow the user to control IED\n% label justifications. Use these commands within\n% the IED environment option or in the \\IEEEiedlistdecl\n% Note that changing the normal list justifications\n% is nonstandard and the IEEE may not like it if you do so!\n% I include these commands as they may be helpful to\n% those who are using these enhanced list controls for\n% other non-IEEE related LaTeX work.\n% itemize and enumerate automatically default to right\n% justification, description defaults to left.\n\\def\\IEEEiedlabeljustifyl{\\def\\@IEEEiedjustify{0}}%left\n\\def\\IEEEiedlabeljustifyc{\\def\\@IEEEiedjustify{1}}%center\n\\def\\IEEEiedlabeljustifyr{\\def\\@IEEEiedjustify{2}}%right\n\n\n\n\n% commands to save to and restore from the list parameter copies\n% this allows us to set all the list parameters within\n% the list_decl and prevent \\list (and its \\@list) \n% from overriding any of our parameters\n% V1.6 use \\edefs instead of dimen's to conserve dimen registers\n% Note controlled spacing here, shield end of lines with %\n\\def\\@IEEEsavelistparams{\\edef\\@IEEEiedtopsep{\\the\\topsep}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEiedlabelwidth{\\the\\labelwidth}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEiedlabelsep{\\the\\labelsep}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEiedleftmargin{\\the\\leftmargin}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEiedpartopsep{\\the\\partopsep}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEiedparsep{\\the\\parsep}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEieditemsep{\\the\\itemsep}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEiedrightmargin{\\the\\rightmargin}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEiedlistparindent{\\the\\listparindent}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEieditemindent{\\the\\itemindent}}\n\n% Note controlled spacing here\n\\def\\@IEEErestorelistparams{\\topsep\\@IEEEiedtopsep\\relax%\n\\labelwidth\\@IEEEiedlabelwidth\\relax%\n\\labelsep\\@IEEEiedlabelsep\\relax%\n\\leftmargin\\@IEEEiedleftmargin\\relax%\n\\partopsep\\@IEEEiedpartopsep\\relax%\n\\parsep\\@IEEEiedparsep\\relax%\n\\itemsep\\@IEEEieditemsep\\relax%\n\\rightmargin\\@IEEEiedrightmargin\\relax%\n\\listparindent\\@IEEEiedlistparindent\\relax%\n\\itemindent\\@IEEEieditemindent\\relax}\n\n\n% v1.6b provide original LaTeX IED list environments\n% note that latex.ltx defines \\itemize and \\enumerate, but not \\description\n% which must be created by the base classes\n% save original LaTeX itemize and enumerate\n\\let\\LaTeXitemize\\itemize\n\\let\\endLaTeXitemize\\enditemize\n\\let\\LaTeXenumerate\\enumerate\n\\let\\endLaTeXenumerate\\endenumerate\n\n% provide original LaTeX description environment from article.cls\n\\newenvironment{LaTeXdescription}\n {\\list{}{\\labelwidth\\z@ \\itemindent-\\leftmargin\n \\let\\makelabel\\descriptionlabel}}\n {\\endlist}\n\\newcommand*\\descriptionlabel[1]{\\hspace\\labelsep\n \\normalfont\\bfseries #1}\n\n\n% override LaTeX's default IED lists\n\\def\\itemize{\\@IEEEitemize}\n\\def\\enditemize{\\@endIEEEitemize}\n\\def\\enumerate{\\@IEEEenumerate}\n\\def\\endenumerate{\\@endIEEEenumerate}\n\\def\\description{\\@IEEEdescription}\n\\def\\enddescription{\\@endIEEEdescription}\n\n% provide the user with aliases - may help those using packages that\n% override itemize, enumerate, or description\n\\def\\IEEEitemize{\\@IEEEitemize}\n\\def\\endIEEEitemize{\\@endIEEEitemize}\n\\def\\IEEEenumerate{\\@IEEEenumerate}\n\\def\\endIEEEenumerate{\\@endIEEEenumerate}\n\\def\\IEEEdescription{\\@IEEEdescription}\n\\def\\endIEEEdescription{\\@endIEEEdescription}\n\n\n% V1.6 we want to keep the IEEEtran IED list definitions as our own internal\n% commands so they are protected against redefinition\n\\def\\@IEEEitemize{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEitemize}{\\@@IEEEitemize[\\relax]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEenumerate{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEenumerate}{\\@@IEEEenumerate[\\relax]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEdescription{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEdescription}{\\@@IEEEdescription[\\relax]}}\n\\def\\@endIEEEitemize{\\endlist}\n\\def\\@endIEEEenumerate{\\endlist}\n\\def\\@endIEEEdescription{\\endlist}\n\n\n% DO NOT ALLOW BLANK LINES TO BE IN THESE IED ENVIRONMENTS\n% AS THIS WILL FORCE NEW PARAGRAPHS AFTER THE IED LISTS\n% IEEEtran itemized list MDS 1/2001\n% Note controlled spacing here, shield end of lines with %\n\\def\\@@IEEEitemize[#1]{%\n \\ifnum\\@itemdepth>3\\relax\\@toodeep\\else%\n \\ifnum\\@listdepth>5\\relax\\@toodeep\\else%\n \\advance\\@itemdepth\\@ne%\n \\edef\\@itemitem{labelitem\\romannumeral\\the\\@itemdepth}%\n % get the IEEElabelindentfactor for this level\n \\advance\\@listdepth\\@ne% we need to know what the level WILL be\n \\edef\\IEEElabelindentfactor{\\csname IEEElabelindentfactor\\romannumeral\\the\\@listdepth\\endcsname}%\n \\advance\\@listdepth-\\@ne% undo our increment\n \\def\\@IEEEiedjustify{2}% right justified labels are default\n % set other defaults\n \\IEEEnocalcleftmarginfalse%\n \\IEEEnolabelindentfactorfalse%\n \\topsep\\IEEEiedtopsep%\n \\IEEElabelindent\\IEEEilabelindent%\n \\labelsep\\IEEEiednormlabelsep%\n \\partopsep 0ex%\n \\parsep 0ex%\n \\itemsep 0ex%\n \\rightmargin 0em%\n \\listparindent 0em%\n \\itemindent 0em%\n % calculate the label width\n % the user can override this later if\n % they specified a \\labelwidth\n \\settowidth{\\labelwidth}{\\csname labelitem\\romannumeral\\the\\@itemdepth\\endcsname}%\n \\@IEEEsavelistparams% save our list parameters\n \\list{\\csname\\@itemitem\\endcsname}{%\n \\@IEEErestorelistparams% override any list{} changes\n % to our globals\n \\let\\makelabel\\@IEEEiedmakelabel% v1.6b setup \\makelabel\n \\IEEEiedlistdecl% let user alter parameters\n #1\\relax%\n % If the user has requested not to use the\n % IEEElabelindent factor, don't revise \\IEEElabelindent\n \\ifIEEEnolabelindentfactor\\relax%\n \\else\\IEEElabelindent=\\IEEElabelindentfactor\\IEEElabelindent%\n \\fi%\n % Unless the user has requested otherwise,\n % calculate our left margin based\n % on \\IEEElabelindent, \\labelwidth and\n % \\labelsep\n \\ifIEEEnocalcleftmargin\\relax%\n \\else\\IEEEcalcleftmargin{\\IEEElabelindent}%\n \\fi}\\fi\\fi}%\n\n\n% DO NOT ALLOW BLANK LINES TO BE IN THESE IED ENVIRONMENTS\n% AS THIS WILL FORCE NEW PARAGRAPHS AFTER THE IED LISTS\n% IEEEtran enumerate list MDS 1/2001\n% Note controlled spacing here, shield end of lines with %\n\\def\\@@IEEEenumerate[#1]{%\n \\ifnum\\@enumdepth>3\\relax\\@toodeep\\else%\n \\ifnum\\@listdepth>5\\relax\\@toodeep\\else%\n \\advance\\@enumdepth\\@ne%\n \\edef\\@enumctr{enum\\romannumeral\\the\\@enumdepth}%\n % get the IEEElabelindentfactor for this level\n \\advance\\@listdepth\\@ne% we need to know what the level WILL be\n \\edef\\IEEElabelindentfactor{\\csname IEEElabelindentfactor\\romannumeral\\the\\@listdepth\\endcsname}%\n \\advance\\@listdepth-\\@ne% undo our increment\n \\def\\@IEEEiedjustify{2}% right justified labels are default\n % set other defaults\n \\IEEEnocalcleftmarginfalse%\n \\IEEEnolabelindentfactorfalse%\n \\topsep\\IEEEiedtopsep%\n \\IEEElabelindent\\IEEEelabelindent%\n \\labelsep\\IEEEiednormlabelsep%\n \\partopsep 0ex%\n \\parsep 0ex%\n \\itemsep 0ex%\n \\rightmargin 0em%\n \\listparindent 0em%\n \\itemindent 0em%\n % calculate the label width\n % We'll set it to the width suitable for all labels using\n % normalfont 1) to 9)\n % The user can override this later\n \\settowidth{\\labelwidth}{9)}%\n \\@IEEEsavelistparams% save our list parameters\n \\list{\\csname label\\@enumctr\\endcsname}{\\usecounter{\\@enumctr}%\n \\@IEEErestorelistparams% override any list{} changes\n % to our globals\n \\let\\makelabel\\@IEEEiedmakelabel% v1.6b setup \\makelabel\n \\IEEEiedlistdecl% let user alter parameters \n #1\\relax%\n % If the user has requested not to use the\n % IEEElabelindent factor, don't revise \\IEEElabelindent\n \\ifIEEEnolabelindentfactor\\relax%\n \\else\\IEEElabelindent=\\IEEElabelindentfactor\\IEEElabelindent%\n \\fi%\n % Unless the user has requested otherwise,\n % calculate our left margin based\n % on \\IEEElabelindent, \\labelwidth and\n % \\labelsep\n \\ifIEEEnocalcleftmargin\\relax%\n \\else\\IEEEcalcleftmargin{\\IEEElabelindent}%\n \\fi}\\fi\\fi}%\n\n\n% DO NOT ALLOW BLANK LINES TO BE IN THESE IED ENVIRONMENTS\n% AS THIS WILL FORCE NEW PARAGRAPHS AFTER THE IED LISTS\n% IEEEtran description list MDS 1/2001\n% Note controlled spacing here, shield end of lines with %\n\\def\\@@IEEEdescription[#1]{%\n \\ifnum\\@listdepth>5\\relax\\@toodeep\\else%\n % get the IEEElabelindentfactor for this level\n \\advance\\@listdepth\\@ne% we need to know what the level WILL be\n \\edef\\IEEElabelindentfactor{\\csname IEEElabelindentfactor\\romannumeral\\the\\@listdepth\\endcsname}%\n \\advance\\@listdepth-\\@ne% undo our increment\n \\def\\@IEEEiedjustify{0}% left justified labels are default\n % set other defaults\n \\IEEEnocalcleftmarginfalse%\n \\IEEEnolabelindentfactorfalse%\n \\topsep\\IEEEiedtopsep% \n \\IEEElabelindent\\IEEEdlabelindent%\n % assume normal labelsep\n \\labelsep\\IEEEiednormlabelsep%\n \\partopsep 0ex%\n \\parsep 0ex%\n \\itemsep 0ex%\n \\rightmargin 0em%\n \\listparindent 0em%\n \\itemindent 0em%\n % Bogus label width in case the user forgets\n % to set it.\n % TIP: If you want to see what a variable's width is you\n % can use the TeX command \\showthe\\width-variable to \n % display it on the screen during compilation \n % (This might be helpful to know when you need to find out\n % which label is the widest)\n \\settowidth{\\labelwidth}{Hello}%\n \\@IEEEsavelistparams% save our list parameters\n \\list{}{\\@IEEErestorelistparams% override any list{} changes\n % to our globals\n \\let\\makelabel\\@IEEEiedmakelabel% v1.6b setup \\makelabel\n \\IEEEiedlistdecl% let user alter parameters \n #1\\relax%\n % If the user has requested not to use the\n % labelindent factor, don't revise \\IEEElabelindent\n \\ifIEEEnolabelindentfactor\\relax%\n \\else\\IEEElabelindent=\\IEEElabelindentfactor\\IEEElabelindent%\n \\fi%\n % Unless the user has requested otherwise,\n % calculate our left margin based\n % on \\IEEElabelindent, \\labelwidth and\n % \\labelsep\n \\ifIEEEnocalcleftmargin\\relax%\n \\else\\IEEEcalcleftmargin{\\IEEElabelindent}\\relax%\n \\fi}\\fi}\n\n% v1.6b we use one makelabel that does justification as needed.\n\\def\\@IEEEiedmakelabel#1{\\relax\\if\\@IEEEiedjustify 0\\relax\n\\makebox[\\labelwidth][l]{\\normalfont #1}\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEiedjustify 1\\relax\n\\makebox[\\labelwidth][c]{\\normalfont #1}\\else\n\\makebox[\\labelwidth][r]{\\normalfont #1}\\fi\\fi}\n\n\n% compsoc uses a larger value for the normal labelsep\n% and also extra spacing above and below each list\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\IEEEiednormlabelsep 1.2em\n \\IEEEiedtopsep 6pt plus 3pt minus 3pt\n\\fi\n\n\n% VERSE and QUOTE\n% V1.7 define environments with newenvironment\n\\newenvironment{verse}{\\let\\\\=\\@centercr\n \\list{}{\\itemsep\\z@ \\itemindent -1.5em \\listparindent \\itemindent\n \\rightmargin\\leftmargin\\advance\\leftmargin 1.5em}\\item\\relax}\n {\\endlist}\n\\newenvironment{quotation}{\\list{}{\\listparindent 1.5em \\itemindent\\listparindent\n \\rightmargin\\leftmargin \\parsep 0pt plus 1pt}\\item\\relax}\n {\\endlist}\n\\newenvironment{quote}{\\list{}{\\rightmargin\\leftmargin}\\item\\relax}\n {\\endlist}\n\n\n% \\titlepage\n% provided only for backward compatibility. \\maketitle is the correct\n% way to create the title page. \n\\def\\titlepage{\\@restonecolfalse\\if@twocolumn\\@restonecoltrue\\onecolumn\n \\else \\newpage \\fi \\thispagestyle{empty}\\c@page\\z@}\n\\def\\endtitlepage{\\if@restonecol\\twocolumn \\else \\newpage \\fi}\n\n% standard values from article.cls\n\\arraycolsep 5pt\n\\arrayrulewidth .4pt\n\\doublerulesep 2pt\n\n\\tabcolsep 6pt\n\\tabbingsep 0.5em\n\n\n%% FOOTNOTES\n%\n%\\skip\\footins 10pt plus 4pt minus 2pt\n% V1.6 respond to changes in font size\n% space added above the footnotes (if present)\n\\skip\\footins 0.9\\baselineskip plus 0.4\\baselineskip minus 0.2\\baselineskip\n\n% V1.6, we need to make \\footnotesep responsive to changes\n% in \\baselineskip or strange spacings will result when in\n% draft mode. Here is a little LaTeX secret - \\footnotesep\n% determines the height of an invisible strut that is placed\n% *above* the baseline of footnotes after the first. Since\n% LaTeX considers the space for characters to be 0.7\\baselineskip\n% above the baseline and 0.3\\baselineskip below it, we need to\n% use 0.7\\baselineskip as a \\footnotesep to maintain equal spacing\n% between all the lines of the footnotes. The IEEE often uses a tad\n% more, so use 0.8\\baselineskip. This slightly larger value also helps\n% the text to clear the footnote marks. Note that \\thanks in IEEEtran\n% uses its own value of \\footnotesep which is set in \\maketitle.\n{\\footnotesize\n\\global\\footnotesep 0.8\\baselineskip}\n\n\n\\skip\\@mpfootins = \\skip\\footins\n\\fboxsep = 3pt\n\\fboxrule = .4pt\n% V1.6 use 1em, then use LaTeX2e's \\@makefnmark\n% Note that the IEEE normally *left* aligns the footnote marks, so we don't need\n% box resizing tricks here.\n\\long\\def\\@makefntext#1{\\parindent 1em\\indent\\hbox{\\@makefnmark}#1}% V1.6 use 1em\n% V1.7 compsoc does not use superscipts for footnote marks\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\def\\@IEEEcompsocmakefnmark{\\hbox{\\normalfont\\@thefnmark.\\ }}\n\\long\\def\\@makefntext#1{\\parindent 1em\\indent\\hbox{\\@IEEEcompsocmakefnmark}#1}\n\\fi\n\n% The IEEE does not use footnote rules\n\\def\\footnoterule{}\n\n% V1.7 for compsoc, the IEEE uses a footnote rule only for \\thanks. We devise a \"one-shot\"\n% system to implement this.\n\\newif\\if@IEEEenableoneshotfootnoterule\n\\@IEEEenableoneshotfootnoterulefalse\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\def\\footnoterule{\\relax\\if@IEEEenableoneshotfootnoterule\n\\kern-5pt\n\\hbox to \\columnwidth{\\hfill\\vrule width 0.5\\columnwidth height 0.4pt\\hfill}\n\\kern4.6pt\n\\global\\@IEEEenableoneshotfootnoterulefalse\n\\else\n\\relax\n\\fi}\n\\fi\n\n% V1.6 do not allow LaTeX to break a footnote across multiple pages\n\\interfootnotelinepenalty=10000\n\n% V1.6 discourage breaks within equations\n% Note that amsmath normally sets this to 10000,\n% but LaTeX2e normally uses 100.\n\\interdisplaylinepenalty=2500\n\n% default allows section depth up to /paragraph\n\\setcounter{secnumdepth}{4}\n\n% technotes do not allow /paragraph\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote\n \\setcounter{secnumdepth}{3}\n\\fi\n% neither do compsoc conferences\n\\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\setcounter{secnumdepth}{3}}\n\n\n\\newcounter{section}\n\\newcounter{subsection}[section]\n\\newcounter{subsubsection}[subsection]\n\\newcounter{paragraph}[subsubsection]\n\n% used only by IEEEtran's IEEEeqnarray as other packages may\n% have their own, different, implementations\n\\newcounter{IEEEsubequation}[equation]\n\n% as shown when called by user from \\ref, \\label and in table of contents\n\\def\\theequation{\\arabic{equation}} % 1\n\\def\\theIEEEsubequation{\\theequation\\alph{IEEEsubequation}} % 1a (used only by IEEEtran's IEEEeqnarray)\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n% compsoc is all arabic\n\\def\\thesection{\\arabic{section}} \n\\def\\thesubsection{\\thesection.\\arabic{subsection}}\n\\def\\thesubsubsection{\\thesubsection.\\arabic{subsubsection}}\n\\def\\theparagraph{\\thesubsubsection.\\arabic{paragraph}}\n\\else\n\\def\\thesection{\\Roman{section}} % I\n% V1.7, \\mbox prevents breaks around - \n\\def\\thesubsection{\\mbox{\\thesection-\\Alph{subsection}}} % I-A\n% V1.7 use I-A1 format used by the IEEE rather than I-A.1\n\\def\\thesubsubsection{\\thesubsection\\arabic{subsubsection}} % I-A1\n\\def\\theparagraph{\\thesubsubsection\\alph{paragraph}} % I-A1a\n\\fi\n\n% From Heiko Oberdiek. Because of the \\mbox in \\thesubsection, we need to\n% tell hyperref to disable the \\mbox command when making PDF bookmarks.\n% This done already with hyperref.sty version 6.74o and later, but\n% it will not hurt to do it here again for users of older versions.\n\\@ifundefined{pdfstringdefPreHook}{\\let\\pdfstringdefPreHook\\@empty}{}%\n\\g@addto@macro\\pdfstringdefPreHook{\\let\\mbox\\relax}\n\n\n% Main text forms (how shown in main text headings)\n% V1.6, using \\thesection in \\thesectiondis allows changes\n% in the former to automatically appear in the latter\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONconference% compsoc conference\n \\def\\thesectiondis{\\thesection.}\n \\def\\thesubsectiondis{\\thesectiondis\\arabic{subsection}.}\n \\def\\thesubsubsectiondis{\\thesubsectiondis\\arabic{subsubsection}.}\n \\def\\theparagraphdis{\\thesubsubsectiondis\\arabic{paragraph}.}\n \\else% compsoc not conferencs\n \\def\\thesectiondis{\\thesection}\n \\def\\thesubsectiondis{\\thesectiondis.\\arabic{subsection}}\n \\def\\thesubsubsectiondis{\\thesubsectiondis.\\arabic{subsubsection}}\n \\def\\theparagraphdis{\\thesubsubsectiondis.\\arabic{paragraph}}\n \\fi\n\\else% not compsoc\n \\def\\thesectiondis{\\thesection.} % I.\n \\def\\thesubsectiondis{\\Alph{subsection}.} % B.\n \\def\\thesubsubsectiondis{\\arabic{subsubsection})} % 3)\n \\def\\theparagraphdis{\\alph{paragraph})} % d)\n\\fi\n\n% just like LaTeX2e's \\@eqnnum\n\\def\\theequationdis{{\\normalfont \\normalcolor (\\theequation)}}% (1)\n% IEEEsubequation used only by IEEEtran's IEEEeqnarray\n\\def\\theIEEEsubequationdis{{\\normalfont \\normalcolor (\\theIEEEsubequation)}}% (1a)\n% redirect LaTeX2e's equation number display and all that depend on\n% it, through IEEEtran's \\theequationdis\n\\def\\@eqnnum{\\theequationdis}\n\n\n\n% V1.7 provide string macros as article.cls does\n\\def\\contentsname{Contents}\n\\def\\listfigurename{List of Figures}\n\\def\\listtablename{List of Tables}\n\\def\\refname{References}\n\\def\\indexname{Index}\n\\def\\figurename{Fig.}\n\\def\\tablename{TABLE}\n\\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\def\\figurename{Figure}}\n\\def\\partname{Part}\n\\def\\appendixname{Appendix}\n\\def\\abstractname{Abstract}\n% IEEE specific names\n\\def\\IEEEkeywordsname{Index Terms}\n\\def\\IEEEproofname{Proof}\n\n\n% LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES AND TABLE OF CONTENTS\n%\n\\def\\@pnumwidth{1.55em}\n\\def\\@tocrmarg{2.55em}\n\\def\\@dotsep{4.5}\n\\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}\n\n% adjusted some spacings here so that section numbers will not easily \n% collide with the section titles. \n% VIII; VIII-A; and VIII-A.1 are usually the worst offenders.\n% MDS 1/2001\n\\def\\tableofcontents{\\section*{\\contentsname}\\@starttoc{toc}}\n\\def\\l@section#1#2{\\addpenalty{\\@secpenalty}\\addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}%\n \\@tempdima 2.75em \\begingroup \\parindent \\z@ \\rightskip \\@pnumwidth%\n \\parfillskip-\\@pnumwidth {\\bfseries\\leavevmode #1}\\hfil\\hbox to\\@pnumwidth{\\hss #2}\\par%\n \\endgroup}\n% argument format #1:level, #2:labelindent,#3:labelsep\n\\def\\l@subsection{\\@dottedtocline{2}{2.75em}{3.75em}}\n\\def\\l@subsubsection{\\@dottedtocline{3}{6.5em}{4.5em}}\n% must provide \\l@ defs for ALL sublevels EVEN if tocdepth\n% is such as they will not appear in the table of contents\n% these defs are how TOC knows what level these things are!\n\\def\\l@paragraph{\\@dottedtocline{4}{6.5em}{5.5em}}\n\\def\\l@subparagraph{\\@dottedtocline{5}{6.5em}{6.5em}}\n\\def\\listoffigures{\\section*{\\listfigurename}\\@starttoc{lof}}\n\\def\\l@figure{\\@dottedtocline{1}{0em}{2.75em}}\n\\def\\listoftables{\\section*{\\listtablename}\\@starttoc{lot}}\n\\let\\l@table\\l@figure\n\n\n% Definitions for floats\n%\n% Normal Floats\n% V1.8 floatsep et al. revised down by 0.15\\baselineskip\n% to account for the sideeffects of \\topskip compensation\n\\floatsep 0.85\\baselineskip plus 0.2\\baselineskip minus 0.2\\baselineskip\n\\textfloatsep 1.55\\baselineskip plus 0.2\\baselineskip minus 0.4\\baselineskip\n\\@fptop 0pt plus 1fil\n\\@fpsep 0.75\\baselineskip plus 2fil\n\\@fpbot 0pt plus 1fil\n\\def\\topfraction{0.9}\n\\def\\bottomfraction{0.4}\n\\def\\floatpagefraction{0.8}\n% V1.7, let top floats approach 90% of page\n\\def\\textfraction{0.1}\n\n% Double Column Floats\n\\dblfloatsep 0.85\\baselineskip plus 0.2\\baselineskip minus 0.2\\baselineskip\n\n\\dbltextfloatsep 1.55\\baselineskip plus 0.2\\baselineskip minus 0.4\\baselineskip\n% Note that it would be nice if the rubber here actually worked in LaTeX2e.\n% There is a long standing limitation in LaTeX, first discovered (to the best\n% of my knowledge) by Alan Jeffrey in 1992. LaTeX ignores the stretchable\n% portion of \\dbltextfloatsep, and as a result, double column figures can and\n% do result in an non-integer number of lines in the main text columns with\n% underfull vbox errors as a consequence. A post to comp.text.tex\n% by Donald Arseneau confirms that this had not yet been fixed in 1998.\n% IEEEtran V1.6 will fix this problem for you in the titles, but it doesn't\n% protect you from other double floats. Happy vspace'ing.\n\n\\@dblfptop 0pt plus 1fil\n\\@dblfpsep 0.75\\baselineskip plus 2fil\n\\@dblfpbot 0pt plus 1fil\n\\def\\dbltopfraction{0.8}\n\\def\\dblfloatpagefraction{0.8}\n\\setcounter{dbltopnumber}{4}\n\n\\intextsep 0.85\\baselineskip plus 0.2\\baselineskip minus 0.2\\baselineskip\n\\setcounter{topnumber}{2}\n\\setcounter{bottomnumber}{2}\n\\setcounter{totalnumber}{4}\n\n\n\n% article class provides these, we should too.\n\\newlength\\abovecaptionskip\n\\newlength\\belowcaptionskip\n% but only \\abovecaptionskip is used above figure captions and *below* table\n% captions\n\\setlength\\abovecaptionskip{0.5\\baselineskip}\n% compsoc journals are a little more generous\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\\ifCLASSOPTIONjournal\n \\setlength\\abovecaptionskip{0.75\\baselineskip}\n\\fi\\fi\n\\setlength\\belowcaptionskip{0pt}\n% V1.6 create hooks in case the caption spacing ever needs to be\n% overridden by a user\n\\def\\@IEEEfigurecaptionsepspace{\\vskip\\abovecaptionskip\\relax}%\n\\def\\@IEEEtablecaptionsepspace{\\vskip\\abovecaptionskip\\relax}%\n\n\n% 1.6b revise caption system so that \\@makecaption uses two arguments\n% as with LaTeX2e. Otherwise, there will be problems when using hyperref.\n\\def\\@IEEEtablestring{table}\n\n\n% V1.8 compensate for \\topskip so top of top figures align with tops of the first lines of main text\n% here we calculate a space equal to the amount \\topskip exceeds the main text height\n% we hook in at \\@floatboxreset\n\\def\\@IEEEfiguretopskipspace{\\ifdim\\prevdepth=-1000pt\\relax\n\\setlength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{1\\topskip}\\relax\n\\addtolength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{-0.7\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}\\relax\n\\vspace*{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\fi}\n% V1.8 compensate for \\topskip at the top of top tables so caption text is on main text baseline\n% use a strut set on the caption baseline within \\@makecaption\n\\def\\@IEEEtabletopskipstrut{\\ifdim\\prevdepth=-1000pt\\rule{0pt}{\\topskip}\\fi}\n% the \\ifdim\\prevdepth checks are always expected to be true for IEEE style float caption ordering\n% because top of figure content and top of captions in tables is the first thing on the vertical\n% list of these floats\n% thanks to Donald Arseneau for his 2000/11/11 post \"Re: caption hacking\" with info on this topic.\n\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n% V1.7 compsoc \\@makecaption\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference% compsoc conference\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{%\n% test if is a for a figure or table\n\\ifx\\@captype\\@IEEEtablestring%\n% if a table, do table caption\n\\footnotesize\\bgroup\\par\\centering\\@IEEEtabletopskipstrut{\\normalfont\\footnotesize {#1.}\\nobreakspace\\scshape #2}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup%\n\\@IEEEtablecaptionsepspace\n% if not a table, format it as a figure\n\\else\n\\@IEEEfigurecaptionsepspace\n\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{\\normalfont\\footnotesize {#1.}\\nobreakspace #2}%\n\\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize%\n% if caption is longer than a line, let it wrap around\n\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{\\normalfont\\footnotesize {#1.}\\nobreakspace}%\n\\parbox[t]{\\hsize}{\\normalfont\\footnotesize \\noindent\\unhbox\\@tempboxa#2}%\n% if caption is shorter than a line, center\n\\else%\n\\hbox to\\hsize{\\normalfont\\footnotesize\\hfil\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n\\fi\\fi}\n%\n\\else% nonconference compsoc\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{%\n% test if is a for a figure or table\n\\ifx\\@captype\\@IEEEtablestring%\n% if a table, do table caption\n\\footnotesize\\bgroup\\par\\centering\\@IEEEtabletopskipstrut{\\normalfont\\sffamily\\footnotesize #1}\\\\{\\normalfont\\sffamily\\footnotesize #2}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup%\n\\@IEEEtablecaptionsepspace\n% if not a table, format it as a figure\n\\else\n\\@IEEEfigurecaptionsepspace\n\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{\\normalfont\\sffamily\\footnotesize {#1.}\\nobreakspace #2}%\n\\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize%\n% if caption is longer than a line, let it wrap around\n\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{\\normalfont\\sffamily\\footnotesize {#1.}\\nobreakspace}%\n\\parbox[t]{\\hsize}{\\normalfont\\sffamily\\footnotesize \\noindent\\unhbox\\@tempboxa#2}%\n% if caption is shorter than a line, left justify\n\\else%\n\\hbox to\\hsize{\\normalfont\\sffamily\\footnotesize\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n\\fi\\fi}\n\\fi\n%\n\\else% traditional noncompsoc \\@makecaption\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{%\n% test if is a for a figure or table\n\\ifx\\@captype\\@IEEEtablestring%\n% if a table, do table caption\n\\footnotesize\\bgroup\\par\\centering\\@IEEEtabletopskipstrut{\\normalfont\\footnotesize #1}\\\\{\\normalfont\\footnotesize\\scshape #2}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup%\n\\@IEEEtablecaptionsepspace\n% if not a table, format it as a figure\n\\else\n\\@IEEEfigurecaptionsepspace\n% 3/2001 use footnotesize, not small; use two nonbreaking spaces, not one\n\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{\\normalfont\\footnotesize {#1.}\\nobreakspace\\nobreakspace #2}%\n\\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize%\n% if caption is longer than a line, let it wrap around\n\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{\\normalfont\\footnotesize {#1.}\\nobreakspace\\nobreakspace}%\n\\parbox[t]{\\hsize}{\\normalfont\\footnotesize\\noindent\\unhbox\\@tempboxa#2}%\n% if caption is shorter than a line, center if conference, left justify otherwise\n\\else%\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference \\hbox to\\hsize{\\normalfont\\footnotesize\\hfil\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n\\else \\hbox to\\hsize{\\normalfont\\footnotesize\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n\\fi\\fi\\fi}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% V1.7 disable captions class option, do so in a way that retains operation of \\label\n% within \\caption\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcaptionsoff\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{\\vspace*{2em}\\footnotesize\\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering{\\footnotesize #1}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup%\n\\let\\@IEEEtemporiglabeldefsave\\label\n\\let\\@IEEEtemplabelargsave\\relax\n\\def\\label##1{\\gdef\\@IEEEtemplabelargsave{##1}}%\n\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{#2}%\n\\let\\label\\@IEEEtemporiglabeldefsave\n\\ifx\\@IEEEtemplabelargsave\\relax\\else\\label{\\@IEEEtemplabelargsave}\\fi}\n\\fi\n\n\n% V1.7 define end environments with \\def not \\let so as to work OK with\n% preview-latex\n\\newcounter{figure}\n\\def\\thefigure{\\@arabic\\c@figure}\n\\def\\fps@figure{tbp}\n\\def\\ftype@figure{1}\n\\def\\ext@figure{lof}\n\\def\\fnum@figure{\\figurename\\nobreakspace\\thefigure}\n% V1.8 within figures add \\@IEEEfiguretopskipspace compensation to LaTeX2e's \\@floatboxreset\n\\def\\figure{\\def\\@floatboxreset{\\reset@font\\normalsize\\@setminipage\\@IEEEfiguretopskipspace}\\@float{figure}}\n\\def\\endfigure{\\end@float}\n% V1.8 also add \\@IEEEfiguretopskipspace compensation to \\figure*\n\\@namedef{figure*}{\\def\\@floatboxreset{\\reset@font\\normalsize\\@setminipage\\@IEEEfiguretopskipspace}\\@dblfloat{figure}}\n\\@namedef{endfigure*}{\\end@dblfloat}\n\n\\newcounter{table}\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\def\\thetable{\\arabic{table}}\n\\else\n\\def\\thetable{\\@Roman\\c@table}\n\\fi\n\\def\\fps@table{tbp}\n\\def\\ftype@table{2}\n\\def\\ext@table{lot}\n\\def\\fnum@table{\\tablename\\nobreakspace\\thetable}\n% V1.6 The IEEE uses 8pt text for tables\n% within tables alter LaTeX2e's \\@floatboxreset to use \\footnotesize\n\\def\\table{\\def\\@floatboxreset{\\reset@font\\footnotesize\\@setminipage}\\@float{table}}\n\\def\\endtable{\\end@float}\n% v1.6b double column tables need to default to footnotesize as well.\n\\@namedef{table*}{\\def\\@floatboxreset{\\reset@font\\footnotesize\\@setminipage}\\@dblfloat{table}}\n\\@namedef{endtable*}{\\end@dblfloat}\n\n\n\n\n%% -- Command Argument Scanning Support Functions --\n%% V1.8a \n\n% usage: \\@IEEEstripouterbraces*{}\n% \\@IEEEstripouterbraces fully expands its argument (which it then stores\n% in \\@IEEEstripouterbracesarg) via \\edef, then removes any outer enclosing\n% braces, and finally stores the result in the macro\n% \\@IEEEstrippedouterbraces.\n%\n% For example:\n% \\@IEEEstripouterbraces{{{{ab}c}}}\n% results in:\n%\n% \\@IEEEstripouterbracesarg ==> a macro containing {{{ab}c}}\n% \\@IEEEstrippedouterbraces ==> a macro containing {ab}c\n%\n% the *-star form,\\@IEEEstripouterbraces*, does not expand the argument\n% contents during processing\n\\def\\@IEEEstripouterbraces{\\@ifstar{\\let\\@IEEEstripouterbracesdef=\\def\\@@IEEEstripouterbraces}{\\let\\@IEEEstripouterbracesdef=\\edef\\@@IEEEstripouterbraces}}\n\n\\def\\@@IEEEstripouterbraces#1{\\@IEEEstripouterbracesdef\\@IEEEstripouterbracesarg{#1}\\relax\n% If the macro is unchanged after being acquired as a single delimited\n% argument, we know we have one sequence of tokens without any enclosing\n% braces. Loop until this is true.\n\\loop\n \\expandafter\\@@@IEEEstripouterbraces\\@IEEEstripouterbracesarg\\@IEEEgeneralsequenceDELIMITER\n\\ifx\\@IEEEstrippedouterbraces\\@IEEEstripouterbracesarg\n\\else\n \\let\\@IEEEstripouterbracesarg\\@IEEEstrippedouterbraces\n\\repeat}\n\n\\def\\@@@IEEEstripouterbraces#1\\@IEEEgeneralsequenceDELIMITER{\\def\\@IEEEstrippedouterbraces{#1}}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\@IEEEextractgroup*{}\n% \\@IEEEextractgroup fully expands its argument (which it then stores in\n% \\@IEEEextractgrouparg) via \\edef and then assigns the first \"brace group\"\n% of tokens to the macro \\@IEEEextractedgroup.\n% The remaining groups, if any, are stored in the macro\n% \\@IEEEextractedgroupremain. If the argument does not contain the requisite\n% groups, the respective macros will be defined to be empty.\n% There is an asymmetry in that \\@IEEEextractedgroup is stripped of its first\n% outer grouping while \\@IEEEextractedgroupremain retains even the outer\n% grouping (if present) that originally identified it as a group.\n%\n% For example:\n% \\@IEEEextractgroup{{{ab}}{c{de}}}\n% results in:\n%\n% \\@IEEEextractgrouparg ==> a macro containing {{ab}}{c{de}}\n% \\@IEEEextractedgroup ==> a macro containing {ab}\n% \\@IEEEextractedgroupremain ==> a macro containing {c{de}}\n%\n% The *-star form, \\@IEEEextractgroup*, does not expand its argument\n% contents during processing.\n\\def\\@IEEEextractgroup{\\@ifstar{\\let\\@IEEEextractgroupdef=\\def\\@@IEEEextractgroup}{\\let\\@IEEEextractgroupdef=\\edef\\@@IEEEextractgroup}}\n\n\\def\\@@IEEEextractgroup#1{\\@IEEEextractgroupdef\\@IEEEextractgrouparg{#1}\\relax\n% trap the case of an empty extracted group as this would cause problems with\n% \\@IEEEextractgroupremain's argument acquisition\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractgrouparg\\@empty\n \\def\\@IEEEextractedgroup{}\\relax\n \\def\\@IEEEextractedgroupremain{}\\relax\n\\else\n % We have to use some dirty tricks here. We want to insert {} around\n % whatever remains after the first group so that TeX's argument scanner\n % will preserve any originally enclosing braces as well as provide an\n % empty argument to acquire even if there isn't a second group.\n % In this first of two dirty tricks, we put a } at the end of the structure\n % we are going to extract from. The \\ifnum0=`{\\fi keeps TeX happy to allow\n % what would otherwise be an unbalanced macro definition for\n % \\@@IEEEextractgroup to be acceptable to it.\n \\ifnum0=`{\\fi\\expandafter\\@IEEEextractgroupremain\\@IEEEextractgrouparg}\\relax\n\\fi}\n\n% In the second part of the dirty tricks, we insert a leading { right after\n% the first group is acquired, but before the remainder is. Again, the\n% \\ifnum0=`}\\fi keeps TeX happy during definition time, but will disappear\n% during run time.\n\\def\\@IEEEextractgroupremain#1{\\def\\@IEEEextractedgroup{#1}\\expandafter\\@@IEEEextractgroupremain\\expandafter{\\ifnum0=`}\\fi}\n\n\\def\\@@IEEEextractgroupremain#1{\\def\\@IEEEextractedgroupremain{#1}}\n\n\n\n% \\@IEEEextracttoken relocated at top because margin setting commands rely on it\n\n\n\n% usage: \\@IEEEextracttokengroups*{}\n% \\@IEEEextracttokengroups fully expands its argument (which it then stores\n% in \\@IEEEextracttokengroupsarg) and then assigns the first \"brace group\" of\n% tokens (with the outermost braces removed) to the macro\n% \\@IEEEextractedfirstgroup.\n% The meaning of the first nonbrace (but including the empty group) token\n% within this first group is assigned via \\let to \\@IEEEextractedfirsttoken\n% as well as stored in the macro \\@IEEEextractedfirsttokenmacro. If a first\n% nonbrace token does not exist (or is an empty group), these will be \\relax\n% and empty, respectively. Tokens that would otherwise be discarded during\n% the acquisition of the first token in the first group are stored in\n% \\@IEEEextractedfirsttokensdiscarded, however their original relative brace\n% nesting depths are not guaranteed to be preserved.\n% The first group within this first group is stored in the macro\n% \\@IEEEextractedfirstfirstgroup.\n% Likewise for the next group after the first: \\@IEEEextractednextgroup,\n% \\@IEEEextractednextfirstgroup, \\@IEEEextractednextgroupfirsttoken,\n% \\@IEEEextractednextgroupfirsttokenmacro, and \n% \\@IEEEextractednextfirsttokensdiscarded.\n% All tokens/groups after the first group, including any enclosing braces,\n% are stored in the macro \\@IEEEextractedafterfirstgroupremain which will\n% be empty if none exist.\n%\n% For example:\n% \\@IEEEextracttokengroups{{{ab}{cd}}{{ef}g}}\n% will result in:\n%\n% \\@IEEEextracttokengroupsarg ==> a macro containing {{ab}{cd}}{{ef}g}\n% \\@IEEEextractedfirstgroup ==> a macro containing {ab}{cd}\n% \\@IEEEextractedafterfirstgroupremain ==> a macro containing {{ef}g}\n% \\@IEEEextractedfirsttoken ==> the letter a\n% \\@IEEEextractedfirsttokenmacro ==> a macro containing a\n% \\@IEEEextractedfirsttokensdiscarded ==> a macro containing bcd\n% \\@IEEEextractedfirstfirstgroup ==> a macro containing ab\n% \\@IEEEextractednextgroup ==> a macro containing {ef}g\n% \\@IEEEextractednextfirsttoken ==> the letter e\n% \\@IEEEextractednextfirsttokenmacro ==> a macro containing e\n% \\@IEEEextractednextfirsttokensdiscarded ==> a macro containing fg\n% \\@IEEEextractednextfirstgroup ==> a macro containing ef\n%\n% If given an empty argument, \\@IEEEextractedfirsttoken and\n% \\@IEEEextractednextfirsttoken will be set to \\relax\n% and all the macros will be empty.\n% the *-star form, \\@IEEEextracttokengroups*, does not expand its argument\n% contents during processing.\n%\n% Depends on: \\@IEEEextractgroup, \\@IEEEextracttoken\n\\def\\@IEEEextracttokengroups{\\@ifstar{\\let\\@IEEEextracttokengroupsdef=\\def\\@@IEEEextracttokengroups}{\\let\\@IEEEextracttokengroupsdef=\\edef\\@@IEEEextracttokengroups}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEextracttokengroups#1{\\@IEEEextracttokengroupsdef\\@IEEEextracttokengroupsarg{#1}\\relax\n% begin extraction, these functions are safe with empty arguments\n% first group\n\\expandafter\\@IEEEextractgroup\\expandafter*\\expandafter{\\@IEEEextracttokengroupsarg}\\relax\n\\let\\@IEEEextractedfirstgroup\\@IEEEextractedgroup\n\\let\\@IEEEextractedafterfirstgroupremain\\@IEEEextractedgroupremain\n\\expandafter\\@IEEEextracttoken\\expandafter*\\expandafter{\\@IEEEextractedfirstgroup}\\relax\n\\let\\@IEEEextractedfirsttoken\\@IEEEextractedtoken\n\\let\\@IEEEextractedfirsttokenmacro\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\n\\let\\@IEEEextractedfirsttokensdiscarded\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\n% first first group\n\\expandafter\\@IEEEextractgroup\\expandafter*\\expandafter{\\@IEEEextractedfirstgroup}\\relax\n\\let\\@IEEEextractedfirstfirstgroup\\@IEEEextractedgroup\n% next group\n\\expandafter\\@IEEEextractgroup\\expandafter*\\expandafter{\\@IEEEextractedafterfirstgroupremain}\\relax\n\\let\\@IEEEextractednextgroup\\@IEEEextractedgroup\n\\expandafter\\@IEEEextracttoken\\expandafter*\\expandafter{\\@IEEEextractednextgroup}\\relax\n\\let\\@IEEEextractednextfirsttoken\\@IEEEextractedtoken\n\\let\\@IEEEextractednextfirsttokenmacro\\@IEEEextractedtokenmacro\n\\let\\@IEEEextractednextfirsttokensdiscarded\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\n% next first group\n\\expandafter\\@IEEEextractgroup\\expandafter*\\expandafter{\\@IEEEextractednextgroup}\\relax\n\\let\\@IEEEextractednextfirstgroup\\@IEEEextractedgroup}\n\n\n%% -- End of Command Argument Scanning Support Functions --\n\n\n\n\n%%\n%% START OF IEEEeqnarray DEFINITIONS\n%%\n%% Inspired by the concepts, examples, and previous works of LaTeX \n%% coders and developers such as Donald Arseneau, Fred Bartlett, \n%% David Carlisle, Tony Liu, Frank Mittelbach, Piet van Oostrum, \n%% Roland Winkler and Mark Wooding.\n%% I don't make the claim that my work here is even near their calibre. ;)\n\n\n\\newif\\if@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojot% flag to indicate if the environment was called as the star form\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojotfalse\n\n\\newif\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt% tracks if the environment should advance the col counter\n% allows a way to make an \\IEEEeqnarraybox that can be used within an \\IEEEeqnarray\n% used by IEEEeqnarraymulticol so that it can work properly in both\n\\@advanceIEEEeqncolcnttrue\n\n\\newcount\\@IEEEeqnnumcols % tracks how many IEEEeqnarray cols are defined\n\\newcount\\@IEEEeqncolcnt % tracks how many IEEEeqnarray cols the user actually used\n\n\n% The default math style used by the columns\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraymathstyle{\\displaystyle}\n% The default text style used by the columns\n% default to using the current font\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraytextstyle{\\relax}\n\n% like the iedlistdecl but for \\IEEEeqnarray\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraydecl{\\relax}\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarrayboxdecl{\\relax}\n\n\n\n% V1.8 flags to indicate that equation numbering is to persist\n\\newif\\if@IEEEeqnumpersist%\n\\@IEEEeqnumpersistfalse\n\\newif\\if@IEEEsubeqnumpersist%\n\\@IEEEsubeqnumpersistfalse\n%\n% V1.8 flags to indicate if (sub)equation number of last line was preadvanced\n\\newif\\if@IEEEeqnumpreadv%\n\\@IEEEeqnumpreadvfalse\n\\newif\\if@IEEEsubeqnumpreadv%\n\\@IEEEsubeqnumpreadvfalse\n\n\\newcount\\@IEEEsubeqnnumrollback% saves previous value of IEEEsubequation number in case we need to restore it\n\n% \\yesnumber is the opposite of \\nonumber\n% a novel concept with the same def as the equationarray package\n% However, we give IEEE versions too since some LaTeX packages such as \n% the MDWtools mathenv.sty redefine \\nonumber to something else.\n% This command is intended for use in non-IEEEeqnarray math environments\n\\providecommand{\\yesnumber}{\\global\\@eqnswtrue}\n\n\n% IEEEyes/nonumber \n% V1.8 add persistant * forms\n% These commands can alter the type of equation an IEEEeqnarray line is.\n\\def\\IEEEyesnumber{\\@ifstar{\\global\\@IEEEeqnumpersisttrue\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpersistfalse\\@IEEEyesnumber}{\\@IEEEyesnumber}}\n\n\\def\\@IEEEyesnumber{\\global\\@eqnswtrue\n\\if@IEEEeqnarrayISinner% alter counters and label only inside an IEEEeqnarray\n\\ifnum\\c@IEEEsubequation>0\\relax\n \\stepcounter{equation}\\setcounter{IEEEsubequation}{0}\\gdef\\@currentlabel{\\p@equation\\theequation}\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentHref{\\@IEEEtheHrefequation}% setup hyperref label\n\\fi\n% even if we reached this eqn num via a preadv, it is legit now\n\\global\\@IEEEeqnumpreadvfalse\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpreadvfalse\n\\fi}\n\n\\def\\IEEEnonumber{\\@ifstar{\\global\\@IEEEeqnumpersistfalse\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpersistfalse\\global\\@eqnswfalse}{\\global\\@eqnswfalse}}\n\n\n\\def\\IEEEyessubnumber{\\@ifstar{\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpersisttrue\\@IEEEyessubnumber}{\\@IEEEyessubnumber}}\n%\n\\def\\@IEEEyessubnumber{\\if@IEEEeqnarrayISinner% alter counters and label only inside an IEEEeqnarray\n \\ifnum\\c@IEEEsubequation>0\\relax% if it already is a subequation, we are good to go as-is\n \\else% if we are a regular equation we have to watch out for two cases\n \\if@IEEEeqnumpreadv% if this equation is the result of a preadvance, backout and bump the sub eqnnum\n \\global\\advance\\c@equation\\m@ne\\global\\c@IEEEsubequation=\\@IEEEsubeqnnumrollback\\addtocounter{IEEEsubequation}{1}\\relax\n \\else% non-preadvanced equations just need initialization of their sub eqnnum\n \\setcounter{IEEEsubequation}{1}\\relax\n \\fi\n \\fi% fi already is subequation\n \\gdef\\@currentlabel{\\p@IEEEsubequation\\theIEEEsubequation}\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentHref{\\@IEEEtheHrefsubequation}% setup hyperref label\n \\global\\@IEEEeqnumpreadvfalse\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpreadvfalse% no longer a preadv anymore\n \\global\\@eqnswtrue\n\\fi}\n\n\n\\def\\IEEEnosubnumber{\\@ifstar{\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpersistfalse\\@IEEEnosubnumber}{\\@IEEEnosubnumber}}\n%\n\\def\\@IEEEnosubnumber{\\if@IEEEeqnarrayISinner% alter counters and label only inside an IEEEeqnarray\n \\if@eqnsw % we do nothing unless we know we will display because we play with the counters here\n % if it currently is a subequation, bump up to the next equation number and turn off the subequation\n \\ifnum\\c@IEEEsubequation>0\\relax\\addtocounter{equation}{1}\\setcounter{IEEEsubequation}{0}\\relax\n \\fi\n \\global\\@IEEEeqnumpreadvfalse\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpreadvfalse% no longer a preadv anymore\n \\gdef\\@currentlabel{\\p@equation\\theequation}\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentHref{\\@IEEEtheHrefequation}% setup hyperref label\n \\fi\n\\fi}\n\n\n\n% allows users to \"push away\" equations that get too close to the equation numbers\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraynumspace{\\hphantom{\\ifnum\\c@IEEEsubequation>0\\relax\\theIEEEsubequationdis\\else\\theequationdis\\fi}}\n\n% provides a way to span multiple columns within IEEEeqnarray environments\n% will consider \\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt before globally advancing the\n% column counter - so as to work within \\IEEEeqnarraybox\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarraymulticol{number cols. to span}{col type}{cell text}\n\\long\\def\\IEEEeqnarraymulticol#1#2#3{\\multispan{#1}\\relax\n% check if column is defined for the precolumn definition\n% We have to be careful here because TeX scans for & even within an \\iffalse\n% where it does not expand macros. So, if we used only one \\ifx and a #3\n% appeared in the false branch and the user inserted another alignment\n% structure that uses & in the \\IEEEeqnarraymulticol{}, TeX will not see that\n% there is an inner alignment in the false branch yet still will see any &\n% there and will think that they apply to the outer alignment resulting in an\n% incomplete \\ifx error.\n% So, here we use separate checks for the pre and post parts in order to keep\n% the #3 outside of all conditionals.\n\\relax\\expandafter\\ifx\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolDEF#2\\endcsname\\@IEEEeqnarraycolisdefined\\relax\n\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPRE#2\\endcsname\n\\else% if not, error and use default type\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Invalid column type \"#2\" in \\string\\IEEEeqnarraymulticol.\\MessageBreak\nUsing a default centering column instead}%\n{You must define IEEEeqnarray column types before use.}%\n\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPRE@IEEEdefault\\endcsname\n\\fi\n% The ten \\relax are to help prevent misleading error messages in case a user\n% accidently inserted a macro that tries to acquire additional arguments.\n#3\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\n% check if column is defined for the postcolumn definition\n\\expandafter\\ifx\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolDEF#2\\endcsname\\@IEEEeqnarraycolisdefined\\relax\n\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPOST#2\\endcsname\n\\else% if not, use the default type\n\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPOST@IEEEdefault\\endcsname\n\\fi\n% advance column counter only if the IEEEeqnarray environment wants it\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by #1\\relax\\fi}\n\n% like \\omit, but maintains track of the column counter for \\IEEEeqnarray\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarrayomit{\\omit\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by 1\\relax\\fi}\n\n\n% provides a way to define a letter referenced column type\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{col. type letter/name}{pre insertion text}{post insertion text}\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol#1#2#3{\\expandafter\\def\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPRE#1\\endcsname{#2}%\n\\expandafter\\def\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPOST#1\\endcsname{#3}%\n\\expandafter\\def\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolDEF#1\\endcsname{1}}\n\n\n% provides a way to define a numerically referenced inter-column glue types\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarraydefcolsep{col. glue number}{glue definition}\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraydefcolsep#1#2{\\expandafter\\def\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolSEP\\romannumeral #1\\endcsname{#2}%\n\\expandafter\\def\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolSEPDEF\\romannumeral #1\\endcsname{1}}\n\n\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraycolisdefined{1}% just a macro for 1, used for checking undefined column types\n\n\n% expands and appends the given argument to the \\@IEEEtrantmptoksA token list\n% used to build up the \\halign preamble\n\\def\\@IEEEappendtoksA#1{\\edef\\@@IEEEappendtoksA{\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA={\\the\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA #1}}%\n\\@@IEEEappendtoksA}\n\n% also appends to \\@IEEEtrantmptoksA, but does not expand the argument\n% uses \\toks8 as a scratchpad register\n\\def\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA#1{\\toks8={#1}%\n\\edef\\@@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA={\\the\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA\\the\\toks8}}%\n\\@@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA}\n\n% define some common column types for the user\n% math\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{l}{$\\IEEEeqnarraymathstyle}{$\\hfil}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{c}{\\hfil$\\IEEEeqnarraymathstyle}{$\\hfil}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{r}{\\hfil$\\IEEEeqnarraymathstyle}{$}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{L}{$\\IEEEeqnarraymathstyle{}}{{}$\\hfil}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{C}{\\hfil$\\IEEEeqnarraymathstyle{}}{{}$\\hfil}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{R}{\\hfil$\\IEEEeqnarraymathstyle{}}{{}$}\n% text\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{s}{\\IEEEeqnarraytextstyle}{\\hfil}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{t}{\\hfil\\IEEEeqnarraytextstyle}{\\hfil}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{u}{\\hfil\\IEEEeqnarraytextstyle}{}\n\n% vertical rules\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{v}{}{\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{vv}{\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth\\hfil}{\\hfil\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{V}{}{\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth\\hskip\\doublerulesep\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{VV}{\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth\\hskip\\doublerulesep\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth\\hfil}%\n{\\hfil\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth\\hskip\\doublerulesep\\vrule width\\arrayrulewidth}\n\n% horizontal rules\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{h}{}{\\leaders\\hrule height\\arrayrulewidth\\hfil}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{H}{}{\\leaders\\vbox{\\hrule width\\arrayrulewidth\\vskip\\doublerulesep\\hrule width\\arrayrulewidth}\\hfil}\n\n% plain\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{x}{}{}\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{X}{$}{$}\n\n% the default column type to use in the event a column type is not defined\n\\IEEEeqnarraydefcol{@IEEEdefault}{\\hfil$\\IEEEeqnarraymathstyle}{$\\hfil}\n\n\n% a zero tabskip (used for \"-\" col types)\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero{0pt plus 0pt minus 0pt}\n% a centering tabskip (used for \"+\" col types)\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPcenter{1000pt plus 0pt minus 1000pt}\n\n% top level default tabskip glues for the start, end, and inter-column\n% may be reset within environments not always at the top level, e.g., \\IEEEeqnarraybox\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultstart{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPcenter}% default start glue\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultend{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPcenter}% default end glue\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultmid{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero}% default inter-column glue\n\n\n\n% creates a vertical rule that extends from the bottom to the top a a cell\n% Provided in case other packages redefine \\vline some other way.\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarrayvrule[rule thickness]\n% If no argument is provided, \\arrayrulewidth will be used for the rule thickness. \n\\newcommand\\IEEEeqnarrayvrule[1][\\arrayrulewidth]{\\vrule\\@width#1\\relax}\n\n% creates a blank separator row\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarrayseprow[separation length][font size commands]\n% default is \\IEEEeqnarrayseprow[0.25\\normalbaselineskip][\\relax]\n% blank arguments inherit the default values\n% uses \\skip5 as a scratch register - calls \\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsize which uses more scratch registers\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarrayseprow{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprow}{\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprow[0.25\\normalbaselineskip]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprow[#1]{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEeqnarrayseprow[#1]}{\\@@IEEEeqnarrayseprow[#1][\\relax]}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEeqnarrayseprow[#1][#2]{\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprowARGONE{#1}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprowARGONE\\@empty%\n% get the skip value, based on the font commands\n% use skip5 because \\IEEEeqnarraystrutsize uses \\skip0, \\skip2, \\skip3\n% assign within a bogus box to confine the font changes\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#2\\relax\\global\\skip5=0.25\\normalbaselineskip}}%\n\\else%\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#2\\relax\\global\\skip5=#1}}%\n\\fi%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayhoptolastcolumn\\IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{\\skip5}{0pt}[\\relax]\\relax}\n\n% creates a blank separator row, but omits all the column templates\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[separation length][font size commands]\n% default is \\IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[0.25\\normalbaselineskip][\\relax]\n% blank arguments inherit the default values\n% uses \\skip5 as a scratch register - calls \\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsize which uses more scratch registers\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut{\\multispan{\\@IEEEeqnnumcols}\\relax% span all the cols\n% advance column counter only if the IEEEeqnarray environment wants it\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by \\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax\\fi%\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut}{\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[0.25\\normalbaselineskip]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[#1]{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[#1]}{\\@@IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[#1][\\relax]}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[#1][#2]{\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprowARGONE{#1}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarrayseprowARGONE\\@empty%\n% get the skip value, based on the font commands\n% use skip5 because \\IEEEeqnarraystrutsize uses \\skip0, \\skip2, \\skip3\n% assign within a bogus box to confine the font changes\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#2\\relax\\global\\skip5=0.25\\normalbaselineskip}}%\n\\else%\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#2\\relax\\global\\skip5=#1}}%\n\\fi%\n\\IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{\\skip5}{0pt}[\\relax]\\relax}\n\n\n\n% draws a single rule across all the columns optional\n% argument determines the rule width, \\arrayrulewidth is the default\n% updates column counter as needed and turns off struts\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[rule line thickness]\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarrayrulerow{\\multispan{\\@IEEEeqnnumcols}\\relax% span all the cols\n% advance column counter only if the IEEEeqnarray environment wants it\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by \\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax\\fi%\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow}{\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[\\arrayrulewidth]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[#1]{\\leaders\\hrule height#1\\hfil\\relax% put in our rule \n% turn off any struts\n\\IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{0pt}{0pt}[\\relax]\\relax}\n\n\n% draws a double rule by using a single rule row, a separator row, and then\n% another single rule row \n% first optional argument determines the rule thicknesses, \\arrayrulewidth is the default\n% second optional argument determines the rule spacing, \\doublerulesep is the default\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[rule line thickness][rule spacing]\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow{\\multispan{\\@IEEEeqnnumcols}\\relax% span all the cols\n% advance column counter only if the IEEEeqnarray environment wants it\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by \\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax\\fi%\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow}{\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[\\arrayrulewidth]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[#1]{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[#1]}%\n{\\@@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[#1][\\doublerulesep]}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[#1][#2]{\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG{#1}%\n% we allow the user to say \\IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[][]\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG\\@empty%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[\\arrayrulewidth]%\n\\else%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[#1]\\relax%\n\\fi%\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG{#2}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG\\@empty%\n\\\\\\IEEEeqnarrayseprow[\\doublerulesep][\\relax]%\n\\else%\n\\\\\\IEEEeqnarrayseprow[#2][\\relax]%\n\\fi%\n\\\\\\multispan{\\@IEEEeqnnumcols}%\n% advance column counter only if the IEEEeqnarray environment wants it\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by \\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax\\fi%\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG{#1}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG\\@empty%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[\\arrayrulewidth]%\n\\else%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[#1]%\n\\fi%\n}\n\n% draws a double rule by using a single rule row, a separator (cutting) row, and then\n% another single rule row \n% first optional argument determines the rule thicknesses, \\arrayrulewidth is the default\n% second optional argument determines the rule spacing, \\doublerulesep is the default\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[rule line thickness][rule spacing]\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowcut{\\multispan{\\@IEEEeqnnumcols}\\relax% span all the cols\n% advance column counter only if the IEEEeqnarray environment wants it\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by \\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax\\fi%\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowcut}{\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowcut[\\arrayrulewidth]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowcut[#1]{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowcut[#1]}%\n{\\@@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowcut[#1][\\doublerulesep]}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowcut[#1][#2]{\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG{#1}%\n% we allow the user to say \\IEEEeqnarraydblrulerow[][]\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG\\@empty%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[\\arrayrulewidth]%\n\\else%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[#1]%\n\\fi%\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG{#2}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG\\@empty%\n\\\\\\IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[\\doublerulesep][\\relax]%\n\\else%\n\\\\\\IEEEeqnarrayseprowcut[#2][\\relax]%\n\\fi%\n\\\\\\multispan{\\@IEEEeqnnumcols}%\n% advance column counter only if the IEEEeqnarray environment wants it\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by \\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax\\fi%\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG{#1}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraydblrulerowARG\\@empty%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[\\arrayrulewidth]%\n\\else%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayrulerow[#1]%\n\\fi%\n}\n\n\n\n% inserts a full row's worth of &'s\n% relies on \\@IEEEeqnnumcols to provide the correct number of columns\n% uses \\@IEEEtrantmptoksA, \\count0 as scratch registers\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayhoptolastcolumn{\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA={}\\count0=1\\relax%\n\\loop% add cols if the user did not use them all\n\\ifnum\\count0<\\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax%\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{&}%\n\\advance\\count0 by 1\\relax% update the col count\n\\repeat%\n\\the\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA%execute the &'s\n}\n\n\n\n\\newif\\if@IEEEeqnarrayISinner % flag to indicate if we are within the lines\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayISinnerfalse % of an IEEEeqnarray - after the IEEEeqnarraydecl\n\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight{0pt} % height and depth of IEEEeqnarray struts\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth{0pt}\n\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutheight{0pt} % default height and depth of\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutdepth{0pt} % struts within an IEEEeqnarray\n\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutHSAVE{0pt} % saved master strut height\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutDSAVE{0pt} % and depth\n\n\\newif\\if@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstrut % flag to indicate that the master strut value\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstruttrue % is to be used\n\n\n\n% saves the strut height and depth of the master strut\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraymasterstrutsave{\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip0=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutheight\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip2=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutdepth\\relax%\n% remove stretchability\n\\dimen0\\skip0\\relax%\n\\dimen2\\skip2\\relax%\n% save values\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutHSAVE{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutDSAVE{\\the\\dimen2}}\n\n% restores the strut height and depth of the master strut\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraymasterstrutrestore{\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip0=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutHSAVE\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip2=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutDSAVE\\relax%\n% remove stretchability\n\\dimen0\\skip0\\relax%\n\\dimen2\\skip2\\relax%\n% restore values\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutheight{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutdepth{\\the\\dimen2}}\n\n\n% globally restores the strut height and depth to the \n% master values and sets the master strut flag to true\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutreset{\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip0=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutheight\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip2=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutdepth\\relax%\n% remove stretchability\n\\dimen0\\skip0\\relax%\n\\dimen2\\skip2\\relax%\n% restore values\n\\xdef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\xdef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth{\\the\\dimen2}%\n\\global\\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstruttrue}\n\n\n% if the master strut is not to be used, make the current\n% values of \\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight, \\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth\n% and the use master strut flag, global\n% this allows user strut commands issued in the last column to be carried\n% into the isolation/strut column\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayglobalizestrutstatus{\\relax%\n\\if@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstrut\\else%\n\\xdef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight{\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight}%\n\\xdef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth{\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth}%\n\\global\\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstrutfalse%\n\\fi}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{height}{depth}[font size commands]\n% If called outside the lines of an IEEEeqnarray, sets the height\n% and depth of both the master and local struts. If called inside\n% an IEEEeqnarray line, sets the height and depth of the local strut\n% only and sets the flag to indicate the use of the local strut\n% values. If the height or depth is left blank, 0.7\\normalbaselineskip\n% and 0.3\\normalbaselineskip will be used, respectively.\n% The optional argument can be used to evaluate the lengths under\n% a different font size and styles. If none is specified, the current\n% font is used.\n% uses scratch registers \\skip0, \\skip2, \\skip3, \\dimen0, \\dimen2\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraystrutsize#1#2{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{#1}{#2}}{\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{#1}{#2}[\\relax]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsize#1#2[#3]{\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeARG{#1}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeARG\\@empty%\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#3\\relax\\global\\skip3=0.7\\normalbaselineskip}}%\n\\skip0=\\skip3\\relax%\n\\else% arg one present\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#3\\relax\\global\\skip3=#1\\relax}}%\n\\skip0=\\skip3\\relax%\n\\fi% if null arg\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeARG{#2}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeARG\\@empty%\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#3\\relax\\global\\skip3=0.3\\normalbaselineskip}}%\n\\skip2=\\skip3\\relax%\n\\else% arg two present\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#3\\relax\\global\\skip3=#2\\relax}}%\n\\skip2=\\skip3\\relax%\n\\fi% if null arg\n% remove stretchability, just to be safe\n\\dimen0\\skip0\\relax%\n\\dimen2\\skip2\\relax%\n% dimen0 = height, dimen2 = depth\n\\if@IEEEeqnarrayISinner% inner does not touch master strut size\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth{\\the\\dimen2}%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstrutfalse% do not use master\n\\else% outer, have to set master strut too\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutheight{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutdepth{\\the\\dimen2}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth{\\the\\dimen2}%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstruttrue% use master strut\n\\fi}\n\n\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeadd{added height}{added depth}[font size commands]\n% If called outside the lines of an IEEEeqnarray, adds the given height\n% and depth to both the master and local struts.\n% If called inside an IEEEeqnarray line, adds the given height and depth\n% to the local strut only and sets the flag to indicate the use \n% of the local strut values.\n% In both cases, if a height or depth is left blank, 0pt is used instead.\n% The optional argument can be used to evaluate the lengths under\n% a different font size and styles. If none is specified, the current\n% font is used.\n% uses scratch registers \\skip0, \\skip2, \\skip3, \\dimen0, \\dimen2\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeadd#1#2{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeadd{#1}{#2}}{\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeadd{#1}{#2}[\\relax]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizeadd#1#2[#3]{\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizearg{#1}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizearg\\@empty%\n\\skip0=0pt\\relax%\n\\else% arg one present\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#3\\relax\\global\\skip3=#1}}%\n\\skip0=\\skip3\\relax%\n\\fi% if null arg\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizearg{#2}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsizearg\\@empty%\n\\skip2=0pt\\relax%\n\\else% arg two present\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{#3\\relax\\global\\skip3=#2}}%\n\\skip2=\\skip3\\relax%\n\\fi% if null arg\n% remove stretchability, just to be safe\n\\dimen0\\skip0\\relax%\n\\dimen2\\skip2\\relax%\n% dimen0 = height, dimen2 = depth\n\\if@IEEEeqnarrayISinner% inner does not touch master strut size\n% get local strut size\n\\expandafter\\skip0=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip2=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth\\relax%\n% add it to the user supplied values\n\\advance\\dimen0 by \\skip0\\relax%\n\\advance\\dimen2 by \\skip2\\relax%\n% update the local strut size\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth{\\the\\dimen2}%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstrutfalse% do not use master\n\\else% outer, have to set master strut too\n% get master strut size\n\\expandafter\\skip0=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutheight\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip2=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutdepth\\relax%\n% add it to the user supplied values\n\\advance\\dimen0 by \\skip0\\relax%\n\\advance\\dimen2 by \\skip2\\relax%\n% update the local and master strut sizes\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutheight{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutdepth{\\the\\dimen2}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight{\\the\\dimen0}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth{\\the\\dimen2}%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstruttrue% use master strut\n\\fi}\n\n\n% allow user a way to see the struts\n\\newif\\ifIEEEvisiblestruts\n\\IEEEvisiblestrutsfalse\n\n% inserts an invisible strut using the master or local strut values\n% uses scratch registers \\skip0, \\skip2, \\dimen0, \\dimen2\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayinsertstrut{\\relax%\n\\if@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstrut\n% get master strut size\n\\expandafter\\skip0=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutheight\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip2=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEmasterstrutdepth\\relax%\n\\else%\n% get local strut size\n\\expandafter\\skip0=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutheight\\relax%\n\\expandafter\\skip2=\\@IEEEeqnarrayTHEstrutdepth\\relax%\n\\fi%\n% remove stretchability, probably not needed\n\\dimen0\\skip0\\relax%\n\\dimen2\\skip2\\relax%\n% dimen0 = height, dimen2 = depth\n% allow user to see struts if desired\n\\ifIEEEvisiblestruts%\n\\vrule width0.2pt height\\dimen0 depth\\dimen2\\relax%\n\\else%\n\\vrule width0pt height\\dimen0 depth\\dimen2\\relax\\fi}\n\n\n% creates an invisible strut, useable even outside \\IEEEeqnarray\n% if \\IEEEvisiblestrutstrue, the strut will be visible and 0.2pt wide. \n% usage: \\IEEEstrut[height][depth][font size commands]\n% default is \\IEEEstrut[0.7\\normalbaselineskip][0.3\\normalbaselineskip][\\relax]\n% blank arguments inherit the default values\n% uses \\dimen0, \\dimen2, \\skip0, \\skip2\n\\def\\IEEEstrut{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEstrut}{\\@IEEEstrut[0.7\\normalbaselineskip]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEstrut[#1]{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEstrut[#1]}{\\@@IEEEstrut[#1][0.3\\normalbaselineskip]}}\n\\def\\@@IEEEstrut[#1][#2]{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@@IEEEstrut[#1][#2]}{\\@@@IEEEstrut[#1][#2][\\relax]}}\n\\def\\@@@IEEEstrut[#1][#2][#3]{\\mbox{#3\\relax%\n\\def\\@IEEEstrutARG{#1}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEstrutARG\\@empty%\n\\skip0=0.7\\normalbaselineskip\\relax%\n\\else%\n\\skip0=#1\\relax%\n\\fi%\n\\def\\@IEEEstrutARG{#2}%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEstrutARG\\@empty%\n\\skip2=0.3\\normalbaselineskip\\relax%\n\\else%\n\\skip2=#2\\relax%\n\\fi%\n% remove stretchability, probably not needed\n\\dimen0\\skip0\\relax%\n\\dimen2\\skip2\\relax%\n\\ifIEEEvisiblestruts%\n\\vrule width0.2pt height\\dimen0 depth\\dimen2\\relax%\n\\else%\n\\vrule width0.0pt height\\dimen0 depth\\dimen2\\relax\\fi}}\n\n\n% enables strut mode by setting a default strut size and then zeroing the\n% \\baselineskip, \\lineskip, \\lineskiplimit and \\jot\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraystrutmode{\\IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{0.7\\normalbaselineskip}{0.3\\normalbaselineskip}[\\relax]%\n\\baselineskip=0pt\\lineskip=0pt\\lineskiplimit=0pt\\jot=0pt}\n\n\n% equation and subequation forms to use to setup hyperref's \\@currentHref\n\\def\\@IEEEtheHrefequation{equation.\\theHequation}\n\\def\\@IEEEtheHrefsubequation{equation.\\theHequation\\alph{IEEEsubequation}}\n\n\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarray{\\@IEEEeqnumpersisttrue\\@IEEEsubeqnumpersistfalse\\@IEEEeqnarray}\n\\def\\endIEEEeqnarray{\\end@IEEEeqnarray}\n\n\\@namedef{IEEEeqnarray*}{\\@IEEEeqnumpersistfalse\\@IEEEsubeqnumpersistfalse\\@IEEEeqnarray}\n\\@namedef{endIEEEeqnarray*}{\\end@IEEEeqnarray}\n\n\n% \\IEEEeqnarray is an enhanced \\eqnarray. \n% The star form defaults to not putting equation numbers at the end of each row.\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarray[decl]{cols}\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarray{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEeqnarray}{\\@@IEEEeqnarray[\\relax]}}\n% We have to be careful here to normalize catcodes just before acquiring the\n% cols as that specification may contain punctuation which could be subject\n% to document catcode changes.\n\\def\\@@IEEEeqnarray[#1]{\\begingroup\\IEEEnormalcatcodes\\@@@IEEEeqnarray[#1]}\n\\def\\@@@IEEEeqnarray[#1]#2{\\endgroup\n % default to showing the equation number or not based on whether or not\n % the star form was involked\n \\if@IEEEeqnumpersist\\global\\@eqnswtrue\n \\else% not the star form\n \\global\\@eqnswfalse\n \\fi% if star form\n % provide a basic hyperref \\theHequation if this has not already been setup (hyperref not loaded, or no section counter)\n \\@ifundefined{theHequation}{\\def\\theHequation{\\arabic{equation}}}{}\\relax\n % provide dummy hyperref commands in case hyperref is not loaded\n \\providecommand{\\Hy@raisedlink}[1]{}\\relax\n \\providecommand{\\hyper@anchorstart}[1]{}\\relax\n \\providecommand{\\hyper@anchorend}{}\\relax\n \\providecommand{\\@currentHref}{}\\relax\n \\@IEEEeqnumpreadvfalse% reset eqnpreadv flag\n \\@IEEEsubeqnumpreadvfalse% reset subeqnpreadv flag\n \\@IEEEeqnarrayISinnerfalse% not yet within the lines of the halign\n \\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{0pt}{0pt}[\\relax]% turn off struts by default\n \\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstruttrue% use master strut till user asks otherwise\n \\IEEEvisiblestrutsfalse% diagnostic mode defaults to off\n % no extra space unless the user specifically requests it\n \\lineskip=0pt\\relax\n \\lineskiplimit=0pt\\relax\n \\baselineskip=\\normalbaselineskip\\relax%\n \\jot=\\IEEEnormaljot\\relax%\n \\mathsurround\\z@\\relax% no extra spacing around math\n \\@advanceIEEEeqncolcnttrue% advance the col counter for each col the user uses, \n % used in \\IEEEeqnarraymulticol and in the preamble build\n %V1.8 Here we preadvance to the next equation number.\n % If the user later wants a continued subequation, we can roll back.\n \\global\\@IEEEsubeqnnumrollback=\\c@IEEEsubequation%\n \\stepcounter{equation}\\@IEEEeqnumpreadvtrue% advance equation counter before first line\n \\setcounter{IEEEsubequation}{0}% no subequation yet\n \\let\\@IEEEcurrentlabelsave\\@currentlabel% save current label as we later change it globally\n \\let\\@IEEEcurrentHrefsave\\@currentHref% save current href label as we later change it globally\n \\def\\@currentlabel{\\p@equation\\theequation}% redefine the ref label\n \\def\\@currentHref{\\@IEEEtheHrefequation}% setup hyperref label\n \\IEEEeqnarraydecl\\relax% allow a way for the user to make global overrides\n #1\\relax% allow user to override defaults\n \\let\\\\\\@IEEEeqnarraycr% replace newline with one that can put in eqn. numbers\n \\global\\@IEEEeqncolcnt\\z@% col. count = 0 for first line\n \\@IEEEbuildpreamble{#2}\\relax% build the preamble and put it into \\@IEEEtrantmptoksA \n % put in the column for the equation number\n \\ifnum\\@IEEEeqnnumcols>0\\relax\\@IEEEappendtoksA{&}\\fi% col separator for those after the first\n \\toks0={##}%\n % advance the \\@IEEEeqncolcnt for the isolation col, this helps with error checking\n \\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by 1\\relax}%\n % add the isolation column\n \\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\tabskip\\z@skip\\bgroup\\the\\toks0\\egroup}%\n % advance the \\@IEEEeqncolcnt for the equation number col, this helps with error checking\n \\@IEEEappendtoksA{&\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by 1\\relax}%\n % add the equation number col to the preamble\n \\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\tabskip\\z@skip\\hb@xt@\\z@\\bgroup\\hss\\the\\toks0\\egroup}%\n % note \\@IEEEeqnnumcols does not count the equation col or isolation col\n % set the starting tabskip glue as determined by the preamble build\n \\tabskip=\\@IEEEBPstartglue\\relax\n % begin the display alignment\n \\@IEEEeqnarrayISinnertrue% commands are now within the lines\n $$\\everycr{}\\halign to\\displaywidth\\bgroup\n % \"exspand\" the preamble\n \\span\\the\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA\\cr}\n\n% enter isolation/strut column (or the next column if the user did not use\n% every column), record the strut status, complete the columns, do the strut if needed,\n% restore counters (to backout any equation setup for a next line that was never used)\n% to their correct values and exit\n\\def\\end@IEEEeqnarray{\\@IEEEeqnarrayglobalizestrutstatus&\\@@IEEEeqnarraycr\\egroup\n\\if@IEEEsubeqnumpreadv\\global\\advance\\c@IEEEsubequation\\m@ne\\fi\n\\if@IEEEeqnumpreadv\\global\\advance\\c@equation\\m@ne\\global\\c@IEEEsubequation=\\@IEEEsubeqnnumrollback\\fi\n\\global\\let\\@currentlabel\\@IEEEcurrentlabelsave% restore current label\n\\global\\let\\@currentHref\\@IEEEcurrentHrefsave% restore current href label\n$$\\@ignoretrue}\n\n\n% IEEEeqnarray uses a modifed \\\\ instead of the plain \\cr to\n% end rows. This allows for things like \\\\*[vskip amount]\n% These \"cr\" macros are modified versions of those for LaTeX2e's eqnarray\n% the {\\ifnum0=`} braces must be kept away from the last column to avoid\n% altering spacing of its math, so we use & to advance to the next column\n% as there is an isolation/strut column after the user's columns\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraycr{\\@IEEEeqnarrayglobalizestrutstatus&% save strut status and advance to next column\n {\\ifnum0=`}\\fi\n \\@ifstar{%\n \\global\\@eqpen\\@M\\@IEEEeqnarrayYCR\n }{%\n \\global\\@eqpen\\interdisplaylinepenalty \\@IEEEeqnarrayYCR\n }%\n}\n\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayYCR{\\@testopt\\@IEEEeqnarrayXCR\\z@skip}\n\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayXCR[#1]{%\n \\ifnum0=`{\\fi}%\n \\@@IEEEeqnarraycr\n \\noalign{\\penalty\\@eqpen\\vskip\\jot\\vskip #1\\relax}}%\n\n\\def\\@@IEEEeqnarraycr{\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA={}% clear token register\n \\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by -1\\relax% adjust col count because of the isolation column\n \\ifnum\\@IEEEeqncolcnt>\\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax\n \\@IEEEclspkgerror{Too many columns within the IEEEeqnarray\\MessageBreak\n environment}%\n {Use fewer \\string &'s or put more columns in the IEEEeqnarray column\\MessageBreak \n specifications.}\\relax%\n \\else\n \\loop% add cols if the user did not use them all\n \\ifnum\\@IEEEeqncolcnt<\\@IEEEeqnnumcols\\relax\n \\@IEEEappendtoksA{&}%\n \\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by 1\\relax% update the col count\n \\repeat\n % this number of &'s will take us the the isolation column\n \\fi\n % execute the &'s\n \\the\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA%\n % handle the strut/isolation column\n \\@IEEEeqnarrayinsertstrut% do the strut if needed\n \\@IEEEeqnarraystrutreset% reset the strut system for next line or IEEEeqnarray\n &% and enter the equation number column\n \\if@eqnsw% only if we display something\n \\Hy@raisedlink{\\hyper@anchorstart{\\@currentHref}}% start a hyperref anchor\n \\global\\@IEEEeqnumpreadvfalse\\relax% displaying an equation number means\n \\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpreadvfalse\\relax% the equation counters point to valid equations\n % V1.8 Here we setup the counters, currentlabel and status for what would be the *next*\n % equation line as would be the case under the current settings. However, there are two problems.\n % One problem is that there might not ever be a next line. The second problem is that the user\n % may later alter the meaning of a line with commands such as \\IEEEyessubnumber. So, to handle\n % these cases we have to record the current values of the (sub)equation counters and revert back\n % to them if the next line is changed or never comes. The \\if@IEEEeqnumpreadv, \\if@IEEEsubeqnumpreadv\n % and \\@IEEEsubeqnnumrollback stuff tracks this.\n % The logic to handle all this is surprisingly complex, but a nice feature of the approach here is\n % that the equation counters and labels remain valid for what the line would be unless a\n % \\IEEEyessubnumber et al. later changes it. So, any hyperref links are always correct.\n \\ifnum\\c@IEEEsubequation>0\\relax% handle subequation\n \\theIEEEsubequationdis\\relax\n \\if@IEEEsubeqnumpersist% setup for default type of next line\n \\stepcounter{IEEEsubequation}\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpreadvtrue\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentlabel{\\p@IEEEsubequation\\theIEEEsubequation}\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentHref{\\@IEEEtheHrefsubequation}% setup hyperref label\n \\else\n % if no subeqnum persist, go ahead and setup for a new equation number\n \\global\\@IEEEsubeqnnumrollback=\\c@IEEEsubequation\n \\stepcounter{equation}\\global\\@IEEEeqnumpreadvtrue\\relax\n \\setcounter{IEEEsubequation}{0}\\gdef\\@currentlabel{\\p@equation\\theequation}\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentHref{\\@IEEEtheHrefequation}% setup hyperref label\n \\fi\n \\else% display a standard equation number\n \\theequationdis\\relax\n \\setcounter{IEEEsubequation}{0}\\relax% not really needed\n \\if@IEEEsubeqnumpersist% setup for default type of next line\n % subequations that follow plain equations carry the same equation number e.g, 5, 5a rather than 5, 6a\n \\stepcounter{IEEEsubequation}\\global\\@IEEEsubeqnumpreadvtrue\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentlabel{\\p@IEEEsubequation\\theIEEEsubequation}\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentHref{\\@IEEEtheHrefsubequation}% setup hyperref label\n \\else\n % if no subeqnum persist, go ahead and setup for a new equation number\n \\global\\@IEEEsubeqnnumrollback=\\c@IEEEsubequation\n \\stepcounter{equation}\\global\\@IEEEeqnumpreadvtrue\\relax\n \\setcounter{IEEEsubequation}{0}\\gdef\\@currentlabel{\\p@equation\\theequation}\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentHref{\\@IEEEtheHrefequation}% setup hyperref label\n \\fi\n \\fi%\n \\Hy@raisedlink{\\hyper@anchorend}% end hyperref anchor\n \\fi% fi only if we display something\n % reset the flags to indicate the default preferences of the display of equation numbers\n \\if@IEEEeqnumpersist\\global\\@eqnswtrue\\else\\global\\@eqnswfalse\\fi\n \\if@IEEEsubeqnumpersist\\global\\@eqnswtrue\\fi% ditto for the subequation flag\n % reset the number of columns the user actually used\n \\global\\@IEEEeqncolcnt\\z@\\relax\n % the real end of the line\n \\cr}\n\n\n\n\n\n% \\IEEEeqnarraybox is like \\IEEEeqnarray except the box form puts everything\n% inside a vtop, vbox, or vcenter box depending on the letter in the second\n% optional argument (t,b,c). Vbox is the default. Unlike \\IEEEeqnarray,\n% equation numbers are not displayed and \\IEEEeqnarraybox can be nested.\n% \\IEEEeqnarrayboxm is for math mode (like \\array) and does not put the vbox\n% within an hbox.\n% \\IEEEeqnarrayboxt is for text mode (like \\tabular) and puts the vbox within\n% a \\hbox{$ $} construct.\n% \\IEEEeqnarraybox will auto detect whether to use \\IEEEeqnarrayboxm or \n% \\IEEEeqnarrayboxt depending on the math mode.\n% The third optional argument specifies the width this box is to be set to -\n% natural width is the default.\n% The * forms do not add \\jot line spacing\n% usage: \\IEEEeqnarraybox[decl][pos][width]{cols}\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarrayboxm{\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojotfalse\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWfalse\\@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\\def\\endIEEEeqnarrayboxm{\\end@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\\@namedef{IEEEeqnarrayboxm*}{\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojottrue\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWfalse\\@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\\@namedef{endIEEEeqnarrayboxm*}{\\end@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarrayboxt{\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojotfalse\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWtrue\\@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\\def\\endIEEEeqnarrayboxt{\\end@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\\@namedef{IEEEeqnarrayboxt*}{\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojottrue\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWtrue\\@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\\@namedef{endIEEEeqnarrayboxt*}{\\end@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\n\\def\\IEEEeqnarraybox{\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojotfalse\\ifmmode\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWfalse\\else\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWtrue\\fi%\n\\@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\\def\\endIEEEeqnarraybox{\\end@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\n\\@namedef{IEEEeqnarraybox*}{\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojottrue\\ifmmode\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWfalse\\else\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWtrue\\fi%\n\\@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\\@namedef{endIEEEeqnarraybox*}{\\end@IEEEeqnarraybox}\n\n% flag to indicate if the \\IEEEeqnarraybox needs to put things into an hbox{$ $} \n% for \\vcenter in non-math mode\n\\newif\\if@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSW%\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSWfalse\n\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarraybox{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@IEEEeqnarraybox}{\\@@IEEEeqnarraybox[\\relax]}}\n% We have to be careful here to normalize catcodes just before acquiring the\n% cols as that specification may contain punctuation which could be subject\n% to document catcode changes.\n\\def\\@@IEEEeqnarraybox[#1]{\\relax\\begingroup\\IEEEnormalcatcodes\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@@IEEEeqnarraybox[#1]}{\\@@@IEEEeqnarraybox[#1][b]}}\n\\def\\@@@IEEEeqnarraybox[#1][#2]{\\relax\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@@@IEEEeqnarraybox[#1][#2]}{\\@@@@IEEEeqnarraybox[#1][#2][\\relax]}}\n\n% #1 = decl; #2 = t,b,c; #3 = width, #4 = col specs\n\\def\\@@@@IEEEeqnarraybox[#1][#2][#3]#4{\\endgroup\\@IEEEeqnarrayISinnerfalse % not yet within the lines of the halign\n \\@IEEEeqnarraymasterstrutsave% save current master strut values\n \\@IEEEeqnarraystrutsize{0pt}{0pt}[\\relax]% turn off struts by default\n \\@IEEEeqnarrayusemasterstruttrue% use master strut till user asks otherwise\n \\IEEEvisiblestrutsfalse% diagnostic mode defaults to off\n % no extra space unless the user specifically requests it\n \\lineskip=0pt\\relax%\n \\lineskiplimit=0pt\\relax%\n \\baselineskip=\\normalbaselineskip\\relax%\n \\jot=\\IEEEnormaljot\\relax%\n \\mathsurround\\z@\\relax% no extra spacing around math\n % the default end glues are zero for an \\IEEEeqnarraybox\n \\edef\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultstart{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero}% default start glue\n \\edef\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultend{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero}% default end glue\n \\edef\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultmid{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero}% default inter-column glue\n \\@advanceIEEEeqncolcntfalse% do not advance the col counter for each col the user uses, \n % used in \\IEEEeqnarraymulticol and in the preamble build\n \\IEEEeqnarrayboxdecl\\relax% allow a way for the user to make global overrides\n #1\\relax% allow user to override defaults\n \\let\\\\\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxcr% replace newline with one that allows optional spacing\n \\@IEEEbuildpreamble{#4}\\relax% build the preamble and put it into \\@IEEEtrantmptoksA\n % add an isolation column to the preamble to stop \\\\'s {} from getting into the last col\n \\ifnum\\@IEEEeqnnumcols>0\\relax\\@IEEEappendtoksA{&}\\fi% col separator for those after the first\n \\toks0={##}%\n % add the isolation column to the preamble\n \\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\tabskip\\z@skip\\bgroup\\the\\toks0\\egroup}% \n % set the starting tabskip glue as determined by the preamble build\n \\tabskip=\\@IEEEBPstartglue\\relax\n % begin the alignment\n \\everycr{}%\n % use only the very first token to determine the positioning\n \\@IEEEextracttoken{#2}\\relax\n \\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\@empty\\else\n \\typeout{** WARNING: IEEEeqnarraybox position specifiers after the first in `\\@IEEEextracttokenarg' ignored (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\relax\n \\fi\n % \\@IEEEextractedtoken has the first token, the rest are ignored\n % if we need to put things into and hbox and go into math mode, do so now\n \\if@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSW \\leavevmode \\hbox \\bgroup $\\fi%\n % use the appropriate vbox type\n \\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken t\\relax\\vtop\\else\\if\\@IEEEextractedtoken c\\relax%\n \\vcenter\\else\\vbox\\fi\\fi\\bgroup%\n \\@IEEEeqnarrayISinnertrue% commands are now within the lines\n \\ifx#3\\relax\\halign\\else\\halign to #3\\relax\\fi%\n \\bgroup\n % \"exspand\" the preamble\n \\span\\the\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA\\cr}\n\n% carry strut status and enter the isolation/strut column, \n% exit from math mode if needed, and exit\n\\def\\end@IEEEeqnarraybox{\\@IEEEeqnarrayglobalizestrutstatus% carry strut status\n&% enter isolation/strut column\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayinsertstrut% do strut if needed\n\\@IEEEeqnarraymasterstrutrestore% restore the previous master strut values\n% reset the strut system for next IEEEeqnarray\n% (sets local strut values back to previous master strut values)\n\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutreset%\n% ensure last line, exit from halign, close vbox\n\\crcr\\egroup\\egroup%\n% exit from math mode and close hbox if needed\n\\if@IEEEeqnarrayboxHBOXSW $\\egroup\\fi}\n\n\n\n% IEEEeqnarraybox uses a modifed \\\\ instead of the plain \\cr to\n% end rows. This allows for things like \\\\[vskip amount]\n% This \"cr\" macros are modified versions those for LaTeX2e's eqnarray\n% For IEEEeqnarraybox, \\\\* is the same as \\\\\n% the {\\ifnum0=`} braces must be kept away from the last column to avoid\n% altering spacing of its math, so we use & to advance to the isolation/strut column\n% carry strut status into isolation/strut column\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxcr{\\@IEEEeqnarrayglobalizestrutstatus% carry strut status\n&% enter isolation/strut column\n\\@IEEEeqnarrayinsertstrut% do strut if needed\n% reset the strut system for next line or IEEEeqnarray\n\\@IEEEeqnarraystrutreset%\n{\\ifnum0=`}\\fi%\n\\@ifstar{\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxYCR}{\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxYCR}}\n\n% test and setup the optional argument to \\\\[]\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxYCR{\\@testopt\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxXCR\\z@skip}\n\n% IEEEeqnarraybox does not automatically increase line spacing by \\jot\n\\def\\@IEEEeqnarrayboxXCR[#1]{\\ifnum0=`{\\fi}%\n\\cr\\noalign{\\if@IEEEeqnarrayboxnojot\\else\\vskip\\jot\\fi\\vskip#1\\relax}}\n\n\n\n% usage: \\@IEEEbuildpreamble{column specifiers}\n% starts the halign preamble build \n% the assembled preamble is put in \\@IEEEtrantmptoksA\n\\def\\@IEEEbuildpreamble#1{\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA={}% clear token register\n\\let\\@IEEEBPcurtype=u%current column type is not yet known\n\\let\\@IEEEBPprevtype=s%the previous column type was the start\n\\let\\@IEEEBPnexttype=u%next column type is not yet known\n% ensure these are valid\n\\def\\@IEEEBPcurglue={0pt plus 0pt minus 0pt}%\n\\def\\@IEEEBPcurcolname{@IEEEdefault}% name of current column definition\n% currently acquired numerically referenced glue\n% use a name that is easier to remember\n\\let\\@IEEEBPcurnum=\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA%\n\\@IEEEBPcurnum=0%\n% tracks number of columns in the preamble\n\\@IEEEeqnnumcols=0%\n% record the default end glues\n\\edef\\@IEEEBPstartglue{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultstart}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEBPendglue{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultend}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEedefMACRO{#1}\\relax% fully expand the preamble to support macro containers\n% now parse the user's column specifications\n% \\ignorespaces is used as a delimiter, need at least one trailing \\relax because\n% \\@@IEEEbuildpreamble looks into the future \n\\expandafter\\@@IEEEbuildpreamble\\@IEEEedefMACRO\\ignorespaces\\relax\\relax}\n\n\n% usage: \\@@IEEEbuildpreamble{current column}{next column}\n% parses and builds the halign preamble\n\\def\\@@IEEEbuildpreamble#1#2{\\let\\@@nextIEEEbuildpreamble=\\@@IEEEbuildpreamble%\n% use only the very first token to check the end\n\\@IEEEextracttokengroups{#1}\\relax\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractedfirsttoken\\ignorespaces\\let\\@@nextIEEEbuildpreamble=\\@@IEEEfinishpreamble\\else%\n% identify current and next token type\n\\@IEEEgetcoltype{#1}{\\@IEEEBPcurtype}{1}% current, error on invalid\n\\@IEEEgetcoltype{#2}{\\@IEEEBPnexttype}{0}% next, no error on invalid next\n% if curtype is a glue, get the glue def\n\\if\\@IEEEBPcurtype g\\@IEEEgetcurglue{#1}{\\@IEEEBPcurglue}\\fi%\n% if curtype is a column, get the column def and set the current column name\n\\if\\@IEEEBPcurtype c\\@IEEEgetcurcol{#1}\\fi%\n% if curtype is a numeral, acquire the user defined glue\n\\if\\@IEEEBPcurtype n\\@IEEEprocessNcol{#1}\\fi%\n% process the acquired glue \n\\if\\@IEEEBPcurtype g\\@IEEEprocessGcol\\fi%\n% process the acquired col \n\\if\\@IEEEBPcurtype c\\@IEEEprocessCcol\\fi%\n% ready prevtype for next col spec.\n\\let\\@IEEEBPprevtype=\\@IEEEBPcurtype%\n% be sure and put back the future token(s) as a group\n\\fi\\@@nextIEEEbuildpreamble{#2}}\n\n\n% usage: \\@@IEEEfinishpreamble{discarded}\n% executed just after preamble build is completed\n% warn about zero cols, and if prevtype type = u, put in end tabskip glue\n% argument is not used\n\\def\\@@IEEEfinishpreamble#1{\\ifnum\\@IEEEeqnnumcols<1\\relax\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{No column specifiers declared for IEEEeqnarray}%\n{At least one column type must be declared for each IEEEeqnarray.}%\n\\fi%num cols less than 1\n%if last type undefined, set default end tabskip glue\n\\if\\@IEEEBPprevtype u\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\tabskip=\\@IEEEBPendglue}\\fi}\n\n\n% usage: \\@IEEEgetcoltype{col specifier}{\\output}{error more}\n% Identify and return the column specifier's type code in the given\n% \\output macro:\n% n = number\n% g = glue (any other char in catagory 12)\n% c = letter\n% e = \\ignorespaces (end of sequence)\n% u = undefined\n% error mode: 0 = no error message, 1 = error on invalid char\n\\def\\@IEEEgetcoltype#1#2#3{%\n% use only the very first token to determine the type\n\\@IEEEextracttoken{#1}\\relax\n% \\@IEEEextractedtoken has the first token, the rest are discarded\n\\let#2=u\\relax% assume invalid until know otherwise\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\ignorespaces\\let#2=e\\else\n\\ifcat\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\relax\\else% screen out control sequences\n\\if0\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if1\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if2\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if3\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if4\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if5\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if6\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if7\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if8\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\if9\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=n\\else\n\\ifcat,\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=g\\relax\n\\else\\ifcat a\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\let#2=c\\relax\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\n\\if#2u\\relax\n\\if0\\noexpand#3\\relax\\else\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Invalid character in column specifications}%\n{Only letters, numerals and certain other symbols are allowed \\MessageBreak\nas IEEEeqnarray column specifiers.}\\fi\\fi}\n\n\n% usage: \\@IEEEgetcurcol{col specifier}\n% verify the letter referenced column exists\n% and return its name in \\@IEEEBPcurcolname\n% if column specifier is invalid, use the default column @IEEEdefault\n\\def\\@IEEEgetcurcol#1{\\expandafter\\ifx\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolDEF#1\\endcsname\\@IEEEeqnarraycolisdefined%\n\\def\\@IEEEBPcurcolname{#1}\\else% invalid column name\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Invalid column type \"#1\" in column specifications.\\MessageBreak\nUsing a default centering column instead}%\n{You must define IEEEeqnarray column types before use.}%\n\\def\\@IEEEBPcurcolname{@IEEEdefault}\\fi}\n\n\n% usage: \\@IEEEgetcurglue{glue specifier}{\\output}\n% identify the predefined (punctuation) glue value\n% and return it in the given output macro\n\\def\\@IEEEgetcurglue#1#2{%\n% ! = \\! (neg small) -0.16667em (-3/18 em)\n% , = \\, (small) 0.16667em ( 3/18 em)\n% : = \\: (med) 0.22222em ( 4/18 em)\n% ; = \\; (large) 0.27778em ( 5/18 em)\n% ' = \\quad 1em\n% \" = \\qquad 2em\n% . = 0.5\\arraycolsep\n% / = \\arraycolsep\n% ? = 2\\arraycolsep\n% * = 1fil\n% + = \\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPcenter\n% - = \\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero\n% Note that all em values are referenced to the math font (textfont2) fontdimen6\n% value for 1em.\n% \n% use only the very first token to determine the type\n\\@IEEEextracttoken{#1}\\relax\n\\ifx\\@IEEEextractedtokensdiscarded\\@empty\\else\n \\typeout{** WARNING: IEEEeqnarray predefined inter-column glue type specifiers after the first in `\\@IEEEextracttokenarg' ignored (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\relax\n\\fi\n% get the math font 1em value\n% LaTeX2e's NFSS2 does not preload the fonts, but \\IEEEeqnarray needs\n% to gain access to the math (\\textfont2) font's spacing parameters.\n% So we create a bogus box here that uses the math font to ensure\n% that \\textfont2 is loaded and ready. If this is not done,\n% the \\textfont2 stuff here may not work.\n% Thanks to Bernd Raichle for his 1997 post on this topic.\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\relax$}}%\n% fontdimen6 has the width of 1em (a quad).\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=\\fontdimen6\\textfont2\\relax%\n% identify the glue value based on the first token\n% we discard anything after the first\n\\if!\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=-0.16667\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\edef#2{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\else\n\\if,\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=0.16667\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\edef#2{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\else\n\\if:\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=0.22222\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\edef#2{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\else\n\\if;\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=0.27778\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\edef#2{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\else\n\\if'\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=1\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\edef#2{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\else\n\\if\"\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=2\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\edef#2{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\else\n\\if.\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=0.5\\arraycolsep\\edef#2{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\else\n\\if/\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\edef#2{\\the\\arraycolsep}\\else\n\\if?\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=2\\arraycolsep\\edef#2{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\else\n\\if *\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\edef#2{0pt plus 1fil minus 0pt}\\else\n\\if+\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\edef#2{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPcenter}\\else\n\\if-\\@IEEEextractedtoken\\edef#2{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero}\\else\n\\edef#2{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero}%\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Invalid predefined inter-column glue type \"#1\" in\\MessageBreak\ncolumn specifications. Using a default value of\\MessageBreak\n0pt instead}%\n{Only !,:;'\"./?*+ and - are valid predefined glue types in the\\MessageBreak \nIEEEeqnarray column specifications.}\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi}\n\n\n% usage: \\@IEEEprocessNcol{digit}\n% process a numerical digit from the column specification\n% and look up the corresponding user defined glue value\n% can transform current type from n to g or a as the user defined glue is acquired\n\\def\\@IEEEprocessNcol#1{\\if\\@IEEEBPprevtype g%\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Back-to-back inter-column glue specifiers in column\\MessageBreak\nspecifications. Ignoring consecutive glue specifiers\\MessageBreak\nafter the first}%\n{You cannot have two or more glue types next to each other\\MessageBreak \nin the IEEEeqnarray column specifications.}%\n\\let\\@IEEEBPcurtype=a% abort this glue, future digits will be discarded\n\\@IEEEBPcurnum=0\\relax%\n\\else% if we previously aborted a glue\n\\if\\@IEEEBPprevtype a\\@IEEEBPcurnum=0\\let\\@IEEEBPcurtype=a%maintain digit abortion\n\\else%acquire this number\n% save the previous type before the numerical digits started\n\\if\\@IEEEBPprevtype n\\else\\let\\@IEEEBPprevsavedtype=\\@IEEEBPprevtype\\fi%\n\\multiply\\@IEEEBPcurnum by 10\\relax%\n\\advance\\@IEEEBPcurnum by #1\\relax% add in number, \\relax is needed to stop TeX's number scan\n\\if\\@IEEEBPnexttype n\\else%close acquisition\n\\expandafter\\ifx\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolSEPDEF\\expandafter\\romannumeral\\number\\@IEEEBPcurnum\\endcsname\\@IEEEeqnarraycolisdefined%\n\\edef\\@IEEEBPcurglue{\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolSEP\\expandafter\\romannumeral\\number\\@IEEEBPcurnum\\endcsname}%\n\\else%user glue not defined\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Invalid user defined inter-column glue type \"\\number\\@IEEEBPcurnum\" in\\MessageBreak\ncolumn specifications. Using a default value of\\MessageBreak\n0pt instead}%\n{You must define all IEEEeqnarray numerical inter-column glue types via\\MessageBreak\n\\string\\IEEEeqnarraydefcolsep \\space before they are used in column specifications.}%\n\\edef\\@IEEEBPcurglue{\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPzero}%\n\\fi% glue defined or not\n\\let\\@IEEEBPcurtype=g% change the type to reflect the acquired glue\n\\let\\@IEEEBPprevtype=\\@IEEEBPprevsavedtype% restore the prev type before this number glue\n\\@IEEEBPcurnum=0\\relax%ready for next acquisition\n\\fi%close acquisition, get glue\n\\fi%discard or acquire number\n\\fi%prevtype glue or not\n}\n\n\n% process an acquired glue\n% add any acquired column/glue pair to the preamble\n\\def\\@IEEEprocessGcol{\\if\\@IEEEBPprevtype a\\let\\@IEEEBPcurtype=a%maintain previous glue abortions\n\\else\n% if this is the start glue, save it, but do nothing else \n% as this is not used in the preamble, but before\n\\if\\@IEEEBPprevtype s\\edef\\@IEEEBPstartglue{\\@IEEEBPcurglue}%\n\\else%not the start glue\n\\if\\@IEEEBPprevtype g%ignore if back to back glues\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Back-to-back inter-column glue specifiers in column\\MessageBreak\nspecifications. Ignoring consecutive glue specifiers\\MessageBreak\nafter the first}%\n{You cannot have two or more glue types next to each other\\MessageBreak \nin the IEEEeqnarray column specifications.}%\n\\let\\@IEEEBPcurtype=a% abort this glue\n\\else% not a back to back glue\n\\if\\@IEEEBPprevtype c\\relax% if the previoustype was a col, add column/glue pair to preamble\n\\ifnum\\@IEEEeqnnumcols>0\\relax\\@IEEEappendtoksA{&}\\fi\n\\toks0={##}%\n% make preamble advance col counter if this environment needs this\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by 1\\relax}\\fi\n% insert the column defintion into the preamble, being careful not to expand\n% the column definition\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\tabskip=\\@IEEEBPcurglue}%\n\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\begingroup\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPRE}%\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\@IEEEBPcurcolname}%\n\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\endcsname}%\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\the\\toks0}%\n\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax%\n\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPOST}%\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\@IEEEBPcurcolname}%\n\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\endcsname\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax%\n\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}%\n\\advance\\@IEEEeqnnumcols by 1\\relax%one more column in the preamble\n\\else% error: non-start glue with no pending column\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{Inter-column glue specifier without a prior column\\MessageBreak\ntype in the column specifications. Ignoring this glue\\MessageBreak \nspecifier}%\n{Except for the first and last positions, glue can be placed only\\MessageBreak\nbetween column types.}%\n\\let\\@IEEEBPcurtype=a% abort this glue\n\\fi% previous was a column\n\\fi% back-to-back glues\n\\fi% is start column glue\n\\fi% prev type not a\n}\n\n\n% process an acquired letter referenced column and, if necessary, add it to the preamble\n\\def\\@IEEEprocessCcol{\\if\\@IEEEBPnexttype g\\else\n\\if\\@IEEEBPnexttype n\\else\n% we have a column followed by something other than a glue (or numeral glue)\n% so we must add this column to the preamble now\n\\ifnum\\@IEEEeqnnumcols>0\\relax\\@IEEEappendtoksA{&}\\fi%col separator for those after the first\n\\if\\@IEEEBPnexttype e\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\tabskip=\\@IEEEBPendglue\\relax}\\else%put in end glue\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\tabskip=\\@IEEEeqnarraycolSEPdefaultmid\\relax}\\fi% or default mid glue\n\\toks0={##}%\n% make preamble advance col counter if this environment needs this\n\\if@advanceIEEEeqncolcnt\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\global\\advance\\@IEEEeqncolcnt by 1\\relax}\\fi\n% insert the column definition into the preamble, being careful not to expand\n% the column definition\n\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\begingroup\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPRE}%\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\@IEEEBPcurcolname}%\n\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\endcsname}%\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\the\\toks0}%\n\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax%\n\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\csname @IEEEeqnarraycolPOST}%\n\\@IEEEappendtoksA{\\@IEEEBPcurcolname}%\n\\@IEEEappendNOEXPANDtoksA{\\endcsname\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax%\n\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\endgroup}%\n\\advance\\@IEEEeqnnumcols by 1\\relax%one more column in the preamble\n\\fi%next type not numeral\n\\fi%next type not glue\n}\n\n\n%%\n%% END OF IEEEeqnarray DEFINITIONS\n%%\n\n\n\n\n\n% set up the running headers and footers\n%\n% header and footer font and size specifications\n\\def\\@IEEEheaderstyle{\\normalfont\\scriptsize}\n\\def\\@IEEEfooterstyle{\\normalfont\\scriptsize}\n%\n% compsoc uses sans-serif headers and footers\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\def\\@IEEEheaderstyle{\\normalfont\\sffamily\\scriptsize}\n \\def\\@IEEEfooterstyle{\\normalfont\\sffamily\\scriptsize}\n\\fi\n\n\n% standard page style, ps@headings\n\\def\\ps@headings{% default to standard twoside headers, no footers\n% will change later if the mode requires otherwise\n\\def\\@oddhead{\\hbox{}\\@IEEEheaderstyle\\rightmark\\hfil\\thepage}\\relax\n\\def\\@evenhead{\\@IEEEheaderstyle\\thepage\\hfil\\leftmark\\hbox{}}\\relax\n\\let\\@oddfoot\\@empty\n\\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote\n % technote twoside\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\hbox{}\\@IEEEheaderstyle\\leftmark\\hfil\\thepage}\\relax\n \\def\\@evenhead{\\@IEEEheaderstyle\\thepage\\hfil\\leftmark\\hbox{}}\\relax\n\\fi\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls\n % draft footers\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\@date\\hfil DRAFT}\\relax\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\@IEEEfooterstyle DRAFT\\hfil\\@date}\\relax\n\\fi\n% oneside\n\\if@twoside\\else\n % standard one side headers\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\hbox{}\\@IEEEheaderstyle\\leftmark\\hfil\\thepage}\\relax\n \\let\\@evenhead\\@empty\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls\n % oneside draft footers\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\@date\\hfil DRAFT}\\relax\n \\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n \\fi\n\\fi\n% turn off headers for conferences\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n \\let\\@oddhead\\@empty\n \\let\\@evenhead\\@empty\n\\fi\n% turn off footers for draftclsnofoot\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofoot\n \\let\\@oddfoot\\@empty\n \\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n\\fi}\n\n\n% title page style, ps@IEEEtitlepagestyle\n\\def\\ps@IEEEtitlepagestyle{% default title page headers, no footers\n\\def\\@oddhead{\\hbox{}\\@IEEEheaderstyle\\leftmark\\hfil\\thepage}\\relax\n\\def\\@evenhead{\\@IEEEheaderstyle\\thepage\\hfil\\leftmark\\hbox{}}\\relax\n\\let\\@oddfoot\\@empty\n\\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n% will change later if the mode requires otherwise\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls\n % draft footers\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofoot\\else\n % but only if not draftclsnofoot\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\@date\\hfil DRAFT}\\relax\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\@IEEEfooterstyle DRAFT\\hfil\\@date}\\relax\n \\fi\n\\else\n % all nondraft mode footers\n \\if@IEEEusingpubid\n % for title pages that are using a pubid\n % do not repeat pubid on the title page if using a peer review cover page\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview\\else\n % for noncompsoc papers, the pubid uses footnotesize and\n % is at the same vertical position as where the last baseline would normally be\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\hbox{}\\hss\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\footnotesize\\raisebox{\\footskip}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEpubid}\\hss\\hbox{}}\\relax\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\hbox{}\\hss\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\footnotesize\\raisebox{\\footskip}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEpubid}\\hss\\hbox{}}\\relax\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n % for compsoc papers, the pubid is at the same vertical position as the normal footer\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\hbox{}\\hss\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\raisebox{0pt}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEpubid}\\hss\\hbox{}}\\relax\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\hbox{}\\hss\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\raisebox{0pt}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEpubid}\\hss\\hbox{}}\\relax\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi\n% turn off headers for conferences\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n \\let\\@oddhead\\@empty\n \\let\\@evenhead\\@empty\n\\fi}\n\n\n% peer review cover page style, ps@IEEEpeerreviewcoverpagestyle\n\\def\\ps@IEEEpeerreviewcoverpagestyle{% default peer review cover no headers, no footers\n\\let\\@oddhead\\@empty\n\\let\\@evenhead\\@empty\n\\let\\@oddfoot\\@empty\n\\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n% will change later if the mode requires otherwise\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls\n % draft footers\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftclsnofoot\\else\n % but only if not draftclsnofoot\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\@date\\hfil DRAFT}\\relax\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\@IEEEfooterstyle DRAFT\\hfil\\@date}\\relax\n \\fi\n\\else\n % all nondraft mode footers\n \\if@IEEEusingpubid\n % for peer review cover pages that are using a pubid\n % for noncompsoc papers, the pubid uses footnotesize and\n % is at the same vertical position as where the last baseline would normally be\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\hbox{}\\hss\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\footnotesize\\raisebox{\\footskip}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEpubid}\\hss\\hbox{}}\\relax\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\hbox{}\\hss\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\footnotesize\\raisebox{\\footskip}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEpubid}\\hss\\hbox{}}\\relax\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n % for compsoc papers, the pubid is at the same vertical position as the normal footer\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\hbox{}\\hss\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\raisebox{0pt}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEpubid}\\hss\\hbox{}}\\relax\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\hbox{}\\hss\\@IEEEfooterstyle\\raisebox{0pt}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEpubid}\\hss\\hbox{}}\\relax\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi}\n\n\n\n%% Defines the command for putting the header.\n%% Note that all the text is forced into uppercase, if you have some text\n%% that needs to be in lower case, for instance et. al., then either manually\n%% set \\leftmark and \\rightmark or use \\MakeLowercase{et. al.} within the\n%% arguments to \\markboth.\n%% V1.7b add \\protect to work with Babel\n\\def\\markboth#1#2{\\def\\leftmark{\\MakeUppercase{\\protect#1}}%\n\\def\\rightmark{\\MakeUppercase{\\protect#2}}}\n\n\\def\\today{\\ifcase\\month\\or\n January\\or February\\or March\\or April\\or May\\or June\\or\n July\\or August\\or September\\or October\\or November\\or December\\fi\n \\space\\number\\day, \\number\\year}\n\n\n\n\n%% CITATION AND BIBLIOGRAPHY COMMANDS\n%% \n%% V1.6 no longer supports the older, nonstandard \\shortcite and \\citename setup stuff\n% \n% \n% Modify Latex2e \\@citex to separate citations with \"], [\"\n\\def\\@citex[#1]#2{%\n \\let\\@citea\\@empty\n \\@cite{\\@for\\@citeb:=#2\\do\n {\\@citea\\def\\@citea{], [}%\n \\edef\\@citeb{\\expandafter\\@firstofone\\@citeb\\@empty}%\n \\if@filesw\\immediate\\write\\@auxout{\\string\\citation{\\@citeb}}\\fi\n \\@ifundefined{b@\\@citeb}{\\mbox{\\reset@font\\bfseries ?}%\n \\G@refundefinedtrue\n \\@latex@warning\n {Citation `\\@citeb' on page \\thepage \\space undefined}}%\n {\\hbox{\\csname b@\\@citeb\\endcsname}}}}{#1}}\n\n% V1.6 we create hooks for the optional use of Donald Arseneau's\n% cite.sty package. cite.sty is \"smart\" and will notice that the\n% following format controls are already defined and will not\n% redefine them. The result will be the proper sorting of the\n% citation numbers and auto detection of 3 or more entry \"ranges\" -\n% all in IEEE style: [1], [2], [5]--[7], [12]\n% This also allows for an optional note, i.e., \\cite[mynote]{..}.\n% If the \\cite with note has more than one reference, the note will\n% be applied to the last of the listed references. It is generally\n% desired that if a note is given, only one reference is listed in\n% that \\cite.\n% Thanks to Mr. Arseneau for providing the required format arguments\n% to produce the IEEE style.\n\\def\\citepunct{], [}\n\\def\\citedash{]--[}\n\n% V1.7 default to using same font for urls made by url.sty\n\\AtBeginDocument{\\csname url@samestyle\\endcsname}\n\n% V1.6 class files should always provide these\n\\def\\newblock{\\hskip .11em\\@plus.33em\\@minus.07em}\n\\let\\@openbib@code\\@empty\n% V1.8b article.cls is now providing these too\n% we do not use \\@mkboth, nor alter the page style\n\\newenvironment{theindex}\n {\\if@twocolumn\n \\@restonecolfalse\n \\else\n \\@restonecoltrue\n \\fi\n \\twocolumn[\\section*{\\indexname}]%\n \\parindent\\z@\n \\parskip\\z@ \\@plus .3\\p@\\relax\n \\columnseprule \\z@\n \\columnsep 35\\p@\n \\let\\item\\@idxitem}\n {\\if@restonecol\\onecolumn\\else\\clearpage\\fi}\n\\newcommand\\@idxitem{\\par\\hangindent 40\\p@}\n\\newcommand\\subitem{\\@idxitem \\hspace*{20\\p@}}\n\\newcommand\\subsubitem{\\@idxitem \\hspace*{30\\p@}}\n\\newcommand\\indexspace{\\par \\vskip 10\\p@ \\@plus5\\p@ \\@minus3\\p@\\relax}\n\n\n\n% Provide support for the control entries of IEEEtran.bst V1.00 and later.\n% V1.7 optional argument allows for a different aux file to be specified in\n% order to handle multiple bibliographies. For example, with multibib.sty:\n% \\newcites{sec}{Secondary Literature}\n% \\bstctlcite[@auxoutsec]{BSTcontrolhak}\n\\def\\bstctlcite{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@bstctlcite}{\\@bstctlcite[@auxout]}}\n\\def\\@bstctlcite[#1]#2{\\@bsphack\n \\@for\\@citeb:=#2\\do{%\n \\edef\\@citeb{\\expandafter\\@firstofone\\@citeb}%\n \\if@filesw\\immediate\\write\\csname #1\\endcsname{\\string\\citation{\\@citeb}}\\fi}%\n \\@esphack}\n\n% \\IEEEnoauxwrite{} allows for citations that do not add to or affect\n% the order of the existing citation list. Can be useful for \\cite\n% within \\thanks{}.\n\\DeclareRobustCommand{\\IEEEnoauxwrite}[1]{\\relax\n\\if@filesw\n\\@fileswfalse\n#1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\n\\@fileswtrue\n\\else\n#1\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\\relax\n\\fi}\n\n% V1.6 provide a way for a user to execute a command just before \n% a given reference number - used to insert a \\newpage to balance\n% the columns on the last page\n\\edef\\@IEEEtriggerrefnum{0} % the default of zero means that\n % the command is not executed\n\\def\\@IEEEtriggercmd{\\newpage}\n\n% allow the user to alter the triggered command\n\\long\\def\\IEEEtriggercmd#1{\\long\\def\\@IEEEtriggercmd{#1}}\n\n% allow user a way to specify the reference number just before the\n% command is executed\n\\def\\IEEEtriggeratref#1{\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA=#1%\n\\edef\\@IEEEtriggerrefnum{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA}}%\n\n% trigger command at the given reference\n\\def\\@IEEEbibitemprefix{\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA=\\@IEEEtriggerrefnum\\relax%\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA by -1\\relax%\n\\ifnum\\c@enumiv=\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA\\relax\\@IEEEtriggercmd\\relax\\fi}\n\n\n\\def\\@biblabel#1{[#1]}\n\n% compsoc journals and conferences left align the reference numbers\n\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\def\\@biblabel#1{[#1]\\hfill}}\n\n% controls bib item spacing\n\\def\\IEEEbibitemsep{0pt plus .5pt}\n\n\\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\def\\IEEEbibitemsep{0.5\\baselineskip plus 0.25\\baselineskip minus 0.25\\baselineskip}}\n\n\n\\def\\thebibliography#1{\\section*{\\refname}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\\refname}%\n % V1.6 add some rubber space here and provide a command trigger\n \\footnotesize\\vskip 0.3\\baselineskip plus 0.1\\baselineskip minus 0.1\\baselineskip%\n \\list{\\@biblabel{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n {\\settowidth\\labelwidth{\\@biblabel{#1}}%\n \\leftmargin\\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\labelsep\\relax\n \\itemsep \\IEEEbibitemsep\\relax\n \\usecounter{enumiv}%\n \\let\\p@enumiv\\@empty\n \\renewcommand\\theenumiv{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n \\let\\@IEEElatexbibitem\\bibitem%\n \\def\\bibitem{\\@IEEEbibitemprefix\\@IEEElatexbibitem}%\n\\def\\newblock{\\hskip .11em plus .33em minus .07em}%\n% originally:\n% \\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000%\n% by adding the \\interlinepenalty here, we make it more\n% difficult, but not impossible, for LaTeX to break within a reference.\n% The IEEE almost never breaks a reference (but they do it more often with\n% technotes). You may get an underfull vbox warning around the bibliography, \n% but the final result will be much more like what the IEEE will publish. \n% MDS 11/2000\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote\\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000\\interlinepenalty100%\n\\else\\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000\\interlinepenalty500\\fi%\n \\sfcode`\\.=1000\\relax}\n\\let\\endthebibliography=\\endlist\n\n\n\n\n% TITLE PAGE COMMANDS\n% \n% \n% \\IEEEmembership is used to produce the sublargesize italic font used to indicate author \n% IEEE membership. compsoc uses a large size sans slant font\n\\def\\IEEEmembership#1{{\\@IEEEnotcompsoconly{\\sublargesize}\\normalfont\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\sffamily}\\textit{#1}}}\n \n\n% \\IEEEauthorrefmark{} produces a footnote type symbol to indicate author affiliation.\n% When given an argument of 1 to 9, \\IEEEauthorrefmark{} follows the standard LaTeX footnote\n% symbol sequence convention. However, for arguments 10 and above, \\IEEEauthorrefmark{} \n% reverts to using lower case roman numerals, so it cannot overflow. Do note that you \n% cannot use \\footnotemark[] in place of \\IEEEauthorrefmark{} within \\author as the footnote\n% symbols will have been turned off to prevent \\thanks from creating footnote marks.\n% \\IEEEauthorrefmark{} produces a symbol that appears to LaTeX as having zero vertical\n% height - this allows for a more compact line packing, but the user must ensure that\n% the interline spacing is large enough to prevent \\IEEEauthorrefmark{} from colliding\n% with the text above.\n% V1.7 make this a robust command\n% V1.8 transmag uses an arabic author affiliation symbol\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\n\\DeclareRobustCommand*{\\IEEEauthorrefmark}[1]{\\raisebox{0pt}[0pt][0pt]{\\textsuperscript{\\footnotesize #1}}}\n\\else\n\\DeclareRobustCommand*{\\IEEEauthorrefmark}[1]{\\raisebox{0pt}[0pt][0pt]{\\textsuperscript{\\footnotesize\\ensuremath{\\ifcase#1\\or *\\or \\dagger\\or \\ddagger\\or%\n \\mathsection\\or \\mathparagraph\\or \\|\\or **\\or \\dagger\\dagger%\n \\or \\ddagger\\ddagger \\else\\textsuperscript{\\expandafter\\romannumeral#1}\\fi}}}}\n\\fi\n\n\n% FONT CONTROLS AND SPACINGS FOR CONFERENCE MODE AUTHOR NAME AND AFFILIATION BLOCKS\n% \n% The default font styles for the author name and affiliation blocks (confmode)\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockNstyle{\\normalfont\\@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly{\\sffamily}\\sublargesize}\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockAstyle{\\normalfont\\@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly{\\sffamily}\\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\itshape}\\normalsize}\n% The default if the user does not use an author block\n\\def\\@IEEEauthordefaulttextstyle{\\normalfont\\@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly{\\sffamily}\\sublargesize}\n\n% adjustment spacing from title (or special paper notice) to author name blocks (confmode)\n% can be negative\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockconfadjspace{-0.25em}\n% compsoc conferences need more space here\n\\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockconfadjspace{0.75\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}}\n\n% spacing between name and affiliation blocks (confmode)\n% This can be negative.\n% The IEEE doesn't want any added spacing here, but I will leave these\n% controls in place in case they ever change their mind.\n% Personally, I like 0.75ex.\n%\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockNtopspace{0.75ex}\n%\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockAtopspace{0.75ex}\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockNtopspace{0.0ex}\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockAtopspace{0.0ex}\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\n% transmag uses one line of space above first affiliation block\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockAtopspace{1\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}\n\\fi\n\n% baseline spacing within name and affiliation blocks (confmode)\n% must be positive, spacings below certain values will make \n% the position of line of text sensitive to the contents of the\n% line above it i.e., whether or not the prior line has descenders, \n% subscripts, etc. For this reason it is a good idea to keep\n% these above 2.6ex\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockNinterlinespace{2.6ex}\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockAinterlinespace{2.75ex}\n\n% This tracks the required strut size.\n% See the \\@IEEEauthorhalign command for the actual default value used.\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockXinterlinespace{2.7ex}\n\n% variables to retain font size and style across groups\n% values given here have no effect as they will be overwritten later\n\\gdef\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontsize{10}\n\\gdef\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontbaselineskip{12}\n\\gdef\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontencoding{OT1}\n\\gdef\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontfamily{ptm}\n\\gdef\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontseries{m}\n\\gdef\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontshape{n}\n\n% saves the current font attributes\n\\def\\@IEEEcurfontSAVE{\\global\\let\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontsize\\f@size%\n\\global\\let\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontbaselineskip\\f@baselineskip%\n\\global\\let\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontencoding\\f@encoding%\n\\global\\let\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontfamily\\f@family%\n\\global\\let\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontseries\\f@series%\n\\global\\let\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontshape\\f@shape}\n\n% restores the saved font attributes\n\\def\\@IEEEcurfontRESTORE{\\fontsize{\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontsize}{\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontbaselineskip}%\n\\fontencoding{\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontencoding}%\n\\fontfamily{\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontfamily}%\n\\fontseries{\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontseries}%\n\\fontshape{\\@IEEESAVESTATEfontshape}%\n\\selectfont}\n\n\n% variable to indicate if the current block is the first block in the column\n\\newif\\if@IEEEprevauthorblockincol \\@IEEEprevauthorblockincolfalse\n\n\n% the command places a strut with height and depth = \\@IEEEauthorblockXinterlinespace\n% we use this technique to have complete manual control over the spacing of the lines\n% within the halign environment.\n% We set the below baseline portion at 30%, the above\n% baseline portion at 70% of the total length.\n% Responds to changes in the document's \\baselinestretch\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorstrutrule{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\@IEEEauthorblockXinterlinespace%\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=\\baselinestretch\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA%\n\\rule[-0.3\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA]{0pt}{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}}\n\n\n% blocks to hold the authors' names and affilations. \n% Makes formatting easy for conferences\n%\n% use real definitions in conference mode\n% name block\n\\def\\IEEEauthorblockN#1{\\relax\\@IEEEauthorblockNstyle% set the default text style\n\\gdef\\@IEEEauthorblockXinterlinespace{0pt}% disable strut for spacer row\n% the \\expandafter hides the \\cr in conditional tex, see the array.sty docs\n% for details, probably not needed here as the \\cr is in a macro\n% do a spacer row if needed\n\\if@IEEEprevauthorblockincol\\expandafter\\@IEEEauthorblockNtopspaceline\\fi\n\\global\\@IEEEprevauthorblockincoltrue% we now have a block in this column\n%restore the correct strut value\n\\gdef\\@IEEEauthorblockXinterlinespace{\\@IEEEauthorblockNinterlinespace}%\n% input the author names\n#1%\n% end the row if the user did not already\n\\crcr}\n% spacer row for names\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockNtopspaceline{\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip\\@IEEEauthorblockNtopspace}}\n%\n% affiliation block\n\\def\\IEEEauthorblockA#1{\\relax\\@IEEEauthorblockAstyle% set the default text style\n\\gdef\\@IEEEauthorblockXinterlinespace{0pt}%disable strut for spacer row\n% the \\expandafter hides the \\cr in conditional tex, see the array.sty docs\n% for details, probably not needed here as the \\cr is in a macro\n% do a spacer row if needed\n\\if@IEEEprevauthorblockincol\\expandafter\\@IEEEauthorblockAtopspaceline\\fi\n\\global\\@IEEEprevauthorblockincoltrue% we now have a block in this column\n%restore the correct strut value\n\\gdef\\@IEEEauthorblockXinterlinespace{\\@IEEEauthorblockAinterlinespace}%\n% input the author affiliations\n#1%\n% end the row if the user did not already\n\\crcr\n% V1.8 transmag does not use any additional affiliation spacing after the first author\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\\gdef\\@IEEEauthorblockAtopspace{0pt}\\fi}\n\n% spacer row for affiliations\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorblockAtopspaceline{\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip\\@IEEEauthorblockAtopspace}}\n\n\n% allow papers to compile even if author blocks are used in modes other\n% than conference or peerreviewca. For such cases, we provide dummy blocks.\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n\\else\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreviewca\\else\n % not conference, peerreviewca or transmag mode\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\\else\n \\def\\IEEEauthorblockN#1{#1}%\n \\def\\IEEEauthorblockA#1{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% we provide our own halign so as not to have to depend on tabular\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorhalign{\\@IEEEauthordefaulttextstyle% default text style\n \\lineskip=0pt\\relax% disable line spacing\n \\lineskiplimit=0pt\\relax%\n \\baselineskip=0pt\\relax%\n \\@IEEEcurfontSAVE% save the current font\n \\mathsurround\\z@\\relax% no extra spacing around math\n \\let\\\\\\@IEEEauthorhaligncr% replace newline with halign friendly one\n \\tabskip=0pt\\relax% no column spacing\n \\everycr{}% ensure no problems here\n \\@IEEEprevauthorblockincolfalse% no author blocks yet\n \\def\\@IEEEauthorblockXinterlinespace{2.7ex}% default interline space\n \\vtop\\bgroup%vtop box\n \\halign\\bgroup&\\relax\\hfil\\@IEEEcurfontRESTORE\\relax ##\\relax\n \\hfil\\@IEEEcurfontSAVE\\@IEEEauthorstrutrule\\cr}\n\n% ensure last line, exit from halign, close vbox\n\\def\\end@IEEEauthorhalign{\\crcr\\egroup\\egroup}\n\n% handle bogus star form\n\\def\\@IEEEauthorhaligncr{{\\ifnum0=`}\\fi\\@ifstar{\\@@IEEEauthorhaligncr}{\\@@IEEEauthorhaligncr}}\n\n% test and setup the optional argument to \\\\[]\n\\def\\@@IEEEauthorhaligncr{\\@testopt\\@@@IEEEauthorhaligncr\\z@skip}\n\n% end the line and do the optional spacer\n\\def\\@@@IEEEauthorhaligncr[#1]{\\ifnum0=`{\\fi}\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip#1\\relax}}\n\n\n\n% flag to prevent multiple \\and warning messages\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNand\n\\@IEEEWARNandtrue\n\n% if in conference or peerreviewca modes, we support the use of \\and as \\author is a\n% tabular environment, otherwise we warn the user that \\and is invalid\n% outside of conference or peerreviewca modes.\n\\def\\and{\\relax} % provide a bogus \\and that we will then override\n\n\\renewcommand{\\and}[1][\\relax]{\\if@IEEEWARNand\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\and is valid only\n when in conference or peerreviewca}\\typeout{modes (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNandfalse}\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference%\n\\renewcommand{\\and}[1][\\hfill]{\\end{@IEEEauthorhalign}#1\\begin{@IEEEauthorhalign}}%\n\\fi\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreviewca\n\\renewcommand{\\and}[1][\\hfill]{\\end{@IEEEauthorhalign}#1\\begin{@IEEEauthorhalign}}%\n\\fi\n% V1.8 transmag uses conference author format\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\n\\renewcommand{\\and}[1][\\hfill]{\\end{@IEEEauthorhalign}#1\\begin{@IEEEauthorhalign}}%\n\\fi\n\n% page clearing command\n% based on LaTeX2e's \\cleardoublepage, but allows different page styles\n% for the inserted blank pages\n\\def\\@IEEEcleardoublepage#1{\\clearpage\\if@twoside\\ifodd\\c@page\\else\n\\hbox{}\\thispagestyle{#1}\\newpage\\if@twocolumn\\hbox{}\\thispagestyle{#1}\\newpage\\fi\\fi\\fi}\n\n% V1.8b hooks to allow adjustment of space above title\n\\def\\IEEEtitletopspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\n% an added extra amount to allow for adjustment/offset\n\\def\\IEEEtitletopspaceextra{0pt}\n\n% user command to invoke the title page\n\\def\\maketitle{\\par%\n \\begingroup%\n \\normalfont%\n \\def\\thefootnote{}% the \\thanks{} mark type is empty\n \\def\\footnotemark{}% and kill space from \\thanks within author\n \\let\\@makefnmark\\relax% V1.7, must *really* kill footnotemark to remove all \\textsuperscript spacing as well.\n \\footnotesize% equal spacing between thanks lines\n \\footnotesep 0.7\\baselineskip%see global setting of \\footnotesep for more info\n % V1.7 disable \\thanks note indention for compsoc\n \\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\long\\def\\@makefntext##1{\\parindent 1em\\noindent\\hbox{\\@makefnmark}##1}}%\n \\normalsize%\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview\n \\newpage\\global\\@topnum\\z@ \\@maketitle\\@IEEEstatictitlevskip\\@IEEEaftertitletext%\n \\thispagestyle{IEEEpeerreviewcoverpagestyle}\\@thanks%\n \\else\n \\if@twocolumn%\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote%\n \\newpage\\global\\@topnum\\z@ \\@maketitle\\@IEEEstatictitlevskip\\@IEEEaftertitletext%\n \\else\n \\twocolumn[{\\IEEEquantizevspace{\\@maketitle}[\\IEEEquantizedisabletitlecmds]{0pt}[-\\topskip]{\\baselineskip}{\\@IEEENORMtitlevspace}{\\@IEEEMINtitlevspace}\\@IEEEaftertitletext}]%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\newpage\\global\\@topnum\\z@ \\@maketitle\\@IEEEstatictitlevskip\\@IEEEaftertitletext%\n \\fi\n \\thispagestyle{IEEEtitlepagestyle}\\@thanks%\n \\fi\n % pullup page for pubid if used.\n \\if@IEEEusingpubid\n \\enlargethispage{-\\@IEEEpubidpullup}%\n \\fi \n \\endgroup\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}\\let\\maketitle\\relax\\let\\@maketitle\\relax\n \\gdef\\@thanks{}%\n % v1.6b do not clear these as we will need the title again for peer review papers\n % \\gdef\\@author{}\\gdef\\@title{}%\n \\let\\thanks\\relax}\n\n\n% V1.8 parbox to format \\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext\n\\long\\def\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextextbox#1{\\parbox{1\\textwidth}{#1}}\n% V1.8 compsoc is partial width\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n% comparison with proofs suggests it's in the range of 92.1-92.3%\n\\long\\def\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextextbox#1{\\parbox{0.922\\textwidth}{\\@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly{\\rightskip\\@flushglue\\leftskip\\z@skip}#1}}\n\\fi\n\n% formats the Title, authors names, affiliations and special paper notice\n% THIS IS A CONTROLLED SPACING COMMAND! Do not allow blank lines or unintentional\n% spaces to enter the definition - use % at the end of each line\n\\def\\@maketitle{\\newpage\n\\bgroup\\par\\vskip\\IEEEtitletopspace\\vskip\\IEEEtitletopspaceextra\\centering%\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote% technotes, V1.8a abstract and index terms are not treated differently for compsoc technotes\n {\\bfseries\\large\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\Large\\sffamily}\\@title\\par}\\vskip 1.3em{\\lineskip .5em\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\large\\sffamily}\\@author\n \\@IEEEspecialpapernotice\\par}\\relax\n\\else% not a technote\n \\vskip0.2em{\\Huge\\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\\bfseries\\LARGE\\fi\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\sffamily}\\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\vskip 2\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\n \\bfseries\\Large}\\@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly{\\vskip 0.75\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}\\@title\\par}\\relax\n \\@IEEEcompsocnotconfonly{\\vskip 0.5\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}\\vskip1.0em\\par%\n % V1.6 handle \\author differently if in conference mode\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONconference%\n {\\@IEEEspecialpapernotice\\mbox{}\\vskip\\@IEEEauthorblockconfadjspace%\n \\mbox{}\\hfill\\begin{@IEEEauthorhalign}\\@author\\end{@IEEEauthorhalign}\\hfill\\mbox{}\\par}\\relax\n \\else% peerreviewca, peerreview or journal\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreviewca\n % peerreviewca handles author names just like conference mode\n {\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\sffamily}\\@IEEEspecialpapernotice\\mbox{}\\vskip\\@IEEEauthorblockconfadjspace%\n \\mbox{}\\hfill\\begin{@IEEEauthorhalign}\\@author\\end{@IEEEauthorhalign}\\hfill\\mbox{}\\par\n {\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\vskip 1.5em\\relax\n \\@IEEEtitleabstractindextextbox{\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext}\\par\\noindent\\hfill\n \\IEEEcompsocdiamondline\\hfill\\hbox{}\\par}}}\\relax\n \\else% journal, peerreview or transmag\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\n % transmag also handles author names just like conference mode\n % it also uses \\@IEEEtitleabstractindextex, but with one line less\n % space above, and one more below\n {\\@IEEEspecialpapernotice\\mbox{}\\vskip\\@IEEEauthorblockconfadjspace%\n \\mbox{}\\hfill\\begin{@IEEEauthorhalign}\\@author\\end{@IEEEauthorhalign}\\hfill\\mbox{}\\par\n {\\vspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\relax\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextextbox{\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext}\\vspace{-1\\baselineskip}\\par}}\\relax\n \\else% journal or peerreview\n {\\lineskip.5em\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\sffamily}\\sublargesize\\@author\\@IEEEspecialpapernotice\\par\n {\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\vskip 1.5em\\relax\n \\@IEEEtitleabstractindextextbox{\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext}\\par\\noindent\\hfill\n \\IEEEcompsocdiamondline\\hfill\\hbox{}\\par}}}\\relax\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup}\n\n\n% V1.7 Computer Society \"diamond line\" which follows index terms for nonconference papers\n% V1.8a full width diamond line for single column use\n\\def\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlinei{\\vrule depth 0pt height 0.5pt width 4cm\\nobreak\\hspace{7.5pt}\\nobreak\n\\raisebox{-3.5pt}{\\fontfamily{pzd}\\fontencoding{U}\\fontseries{m}\\fontshape{n}\\fontsize{11}{12}\\selectfont\\char70}\\nobreak\n\\hspace{7.5pt}\\nobreak\\vrule depth 0pt height 0.5pt width 4cm\\relax}\n% V1.8a narrower width diamond line for double column use\n\\def\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlineii{\\vrule depth 0pt height 0.5pt width 2.5cm\\nobreak\\hspace{7.5pt}\\nobreak\n\\raisebox{-3.5pt}{\\fontfamily{pzd}\\fontencoding{U}\\fontseries{m}\\fontshape{n}\\fontsize{11}{12}\\selectfont\\char70}\\nobreak\n\\hspace{7.5pt}\\nobreak\\vrule depth 0pt height 0.5pt width 2.5cm\\relax}\n% V1.8a bare core without rules to base a last resort on for very narrow linewidths\n\\def\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlineiii{\\mbox{}\\nobreak\\hspace{7.5pt}\\nobreak\n\\raisebox{-3.5pt}{\\fontfamily{pzd}\\fontencoding{U}\\fontseries{m}\\fontshape{n}\\fontsize{11}{12}\\selectfont\\char70}\\nobreak\n\\hspace{7.5pt}\\nobreak\\mbox{}\\relax}\n\n% V1.8a allow \\IEEEcompsocdiamondline to adjust for different linewidths.\n% Use \\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlinei if its width is less than 0.66\\linewidth (0.487 nominal for single column)\n% if not, fall back to \\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlineii if its width is less than 0.75\\linewidth (0.659 nominal for double column)\n% if all else fails, try to make a custom diamondline based on the abnormally narrow linewidth\n\\def\\IEEEcompsocdiamondline{\\settowidth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlinei}\\relax\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA<0.66\\linewidth\\relax\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlinei\\relax\n\\else\n\\settowidth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlineii}\\relax\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA<0.75\\linewidth\\relax\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlineii\\relax\n\\else\n\\settowidth{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlineiii}\\relax\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB=\\linewidth\\relax\n\\addtolength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}{-1\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}\\relax\n\\vrule depth 0pt height 0.5pt width 0.33\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\@IEEEcompsocdiamondlineiii\\vrule depth 0pt height 0.5pt width 0.33\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax\n\\fi\\fi}\n\n\n% V1.7 standard LateX2e \\thanks, but with \\itshape under compsoc. Also make it a \\long\\def\n% We also need to trigger the one-shot footnote rule\n\\def\\@IEEEtriggeroneshotfootnoterule{\\global\\@IEEEenableoneshotfootnoteruletrue}\n\n\n\\long\\def\\thanks#1{\\footnotemark\n \\protected@xdef\\@thanks{\\@thanks\n \\protect\\footnotetext[\\the\\c@footnote]{\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\itshape\n \\protect\\@IEEEtriggeroneshotfootnoterule\\relax}\\ignorespaces#1}}}\n\\let\\@thanks\\@empty\n\n\n% V1.7 allow \\author to contain \\par's. This is needed to allow \\thanks to contain \\par.\n\\long\\def\\author#1{\\gdef\\@author{#1}}\n\n\n% in addition to setting up IEEEitemize, we need to remove a baselineskip space above and\n% below it because \\list's \\pars introduce blank lines because of the footnote struts.\n\\def\\@IEEEsetupcompsocitemizelist{\\def\\labelitemi{$\\bullet$}%\n\\setlength{\\IEEElabelindent}{0pt}\\setlength{\\labelsep}{1.2em}\\setlength{\\parskip}{0pt}%\n\\setlength{\\partopsep}{0pt}\\setlength{\\topsep}{0.5\\baselineskip}\\vspace{-1\\baselineskip}\\relax}\n\n\n% flag for fake non-compsoc \\IEEEcompsocthanksitem - prevents line break on very first item\n\\newif\\if@IEEEbreakcompsocthanksitem \\@IEEEbreakcompsocthanksitemfalse\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n% V1.7 compsoc bullet item \\thanks\n% also, we need to redefine this to destroy the argument in \\IEEEquantizevspace\n\\long\\def\\IEEEcompsocitemizethanks#1{\\relax\\@IEEEbreakcompsocthanksitemfalse\\footnotemark\n \\protected@xdef\\@thanks{\\@thanks\n \\protect\\footnotetext[\\the\\c@footnote]{\\itshape\\protect\\@IEEEtriggeroneshotfootnoterule\n {\\let\\IEEEiedlistdecl\\relax\\protect\\begin{IEEEitemize}[\\protect\\@IEEEsetupcompsocitemizelist]\\ignorespaces#1\\relax\n \\protect\\end{IEEEitemize}}\\protect\\vspace{-1\\baselineskip}}}}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand*{\\IEEEcompsocthanksitem}{\\item}\n\\else\n% non-compsoc, allow for dual compilation via rerouting to normal \\thanks\n\\long\\def\\IEEEcompsocitemizethanks#1{\\thanks{#1}}\n% redirect to \"pseudo-par\" \\hfil\\break\\indent after swallowing [] from \\IEEEcompsocthanksitem[]\n\\DeclareRobustCommand{\\IEEEcompsocthanksitem}{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@IEEEthanksswallowoptionalarg}%\n{\\@IEEEthanksswallowoptionalarg[\\relax]}}\n% be sure and break only after first item, be sure and ignore spaces after optional argument\n\\def\\@IEEEthanksswallowoptionalarg[#1]{\\relax\\if@IEEEbreakcompsocthanksitem\\hfil\\break\n\\indent\\fi\\@IEEEbreakcompsocthanksitemtrue\\ignorespaces}\n\\fi\n\n\n% V1.6b define the \\IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle as needed\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview\n\\def\\IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle{\\@IEEEcleardoublepage{empty}%\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtwocolumn\n\\twocolumn[{\\IEEEquantizevspace{\\@IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle}[\\IEEEquantizedisabletitlecmds]{0pt}[-\\topskip]{\\baselineskip}{\\@IEEENORMtitlevspace}{\\@IEEEMINtitlevspace}}]\n\\else\n\\newpage\\@IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle\\@IEEEstatictitlevskip\n\\fi\n\\thispagestyle{IEEEtitlepagestyle}}\n\\else\n% \\IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle does nothing if peer review option has not been selected\n\\def\\IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle{\\relax}\n\\fi\n\n% peerreview formats the repeated title like the title in journal papers.\n\\def\\@IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle{\\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\sffamily}%\n\\normalfont\\normalsize\\vskip0.2em{\\Huge\\@title\\par}\\vskip1.0em\\par\n\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup}\n\n\n\n% V1.6 \n% this is a static rubber spacer between the title/authors and the main text\n% used for single column text, or when the title appears in the first column\n% of two column text (technotes). \n\\def\\@IEEEstatictitlevskip{{\\normalfont\\normalsize\n% adjust spacing to next text\n% v1.6b handle peer review papers\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview\n% for peer review papers, the same value is used for both title pages\n% regardless of the other paper modes\n \\vskip 1\\baselineskip plus 0.375\\baselineskip minus 0.1875\\baselineskip\n\\else\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONconference% conference\n \\vskip 1\\baselineskip plus 0.375\\baselineskip minus 0.1875\\baselineskip%\n \\else%\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote% technote\n \\vskip 1\\baselineskip plus 0.375\\baselineskip minus 0.1875\\baselineskip%\n \\else% journal uses more space\n \\vskip 2.5\\baselineskip plus 0.75\\baselineskip minus 0.375\\baselineskip%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi}}\n\n\n% set the nominal and minimum values for the quantized title spacer\n% the quantization algorithm will not allow the spacer size to\n% become less than \\@IEEEMINtitlevspace - instead it will be lengthened\n% default to journal values\n\\def\\@IEEENORMtitlevspace{2.5\\baselineskip}\n\\def\\@IEEEMINtitlevspace{2\\baselineskip}\n% conferences and technotes need tighter spacing\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference% conference\n \\def\\@IEEENORMtitlevspace{1\\baselineskip}\n \\def\\@IEEEMINtitlevspace{0.75\\baselineskip}\n\\fi\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote% technote\n \\def\\@IEEENORMtitlevspace{1\\baselineskip}\n \\def\\@IEEEMINtitlevspace{0.75\\baselineskip}\n\\fi\n\n\n% V1.8a\n\\def\\IEEEquantizevspace{\\begingroup\\@ifstar{\\@IEEEquantizevspacestarformtrue\\@IEEEquantizevspace}{\\@IEEEquantizevspacestarformfalse\\@IEEEquantizevspace}}\n% \\IEEEquantizevspace[output dimen register]{object}[object decl]\n% {top baselineskip}\n% [offset][prevdepth][lineskip limit][lineskip]\n% {unit height}{nominal vspace}{minimum vspace}\n%\n% Calculates and creates the vspace needed to make the combined height with\n% the given object an integer multiple of the given unit height. This command\n% is more general than the older \\@IEEEdynamictitlevspace it replaces.\n%\n% The star form has no effect at present, but is reserved for future use.\n%\n% If the optional argument [output dimen register] is given, the calculated\n% vspace height is stored in the given output dimen (or skip) register\n% and no other action is taken, otherwise the object followed by a vspace*\n% of the appropriate height is evaluated/output.\n%\n% The optional object decl (declarations) is code that is evaluated just\n% before the object's height is evaluated. Its intented purpose is to allow\n% for the alteration or disabling of code within the object during internal\n% height evaluation (e.g., \\long\\def\\thanks#1{\\relax} ).\n% This special code is not invoked if/when the object is rendered at the end.\n%\n% The nominal vspace is the target value of the added vspace and the minimum\n% vspace is the lower allowed limit. The vspacer will be the value that achieves\n% integral overall height, in terms of the given unit height, that is closest\n% to the nominal vspace and that is not less than the specified minimum vspace.\n%\n% The line spacing algorithm of TeX is somewhat involved and requires special\n% care with regard to the first line of a vertical list (which is indicated\n% when \\prevdepth is -1000pt or less). top baselineskip specifies the\n% baselineskip or topskip used prior to the object. If the height of the\n% first line of the object is greater than the given top baselineskip, then\n% the top baselineskip is subtracted from the height of the first line and\n% that difference is considered along with the rest of the object height\n% (because the object will be shifted down by an amount = \n% top line height - top baselineskip). Otherwise, the height of the first line\n% of the object is ignored as far as the calculations are concerned.\n% This algorithm is adequate for objects that appear at the top of a page\n% (e.g., titles) where \\topskip spacing is used.\n%\n% However, as explained on page 78 of the TeXbook, interline spacing is more\n% complex when \\baselineskip is being used (indicated by \\prevdepth > \n% -1000pt). The four optional parameters offset, prevdepth, lineskip limit and\n% lineskip are assumed to be equal to be 0pt, \\prevdepth, \\lineskiplimit and\n% \\lineskip, respectively, if they are omitted.\n%\n% The prevdepth is the depth of the line before the object, the lineskip limit\n% specifies how close the top of the object can come to the bottom of the\n% previous line before \\baselineskip is ignored and \\lineskip is inserted\n% between the object and the line above it. Lineskip does not come into\n% play unless the first line of the object is high enough to \"get too close\"\n% (as specified by lineskiplimit) to the line before it. The the prevdepth,\n% lineskip limit, and lineskip optional parameters are not needed for the\n% first object/line on a page (i.e., prevdepth <= -1000pt) where the simplier\n% \\topskip spacing rules are in effect.\n%\n% Offset is a manual adjustment that is added to the height calculations of\n% object irrespective of the value of \\prevdepth. It is useful when the top\n% baselineskip will result in a noninteger unit height object placement even\n% if the object itself has integral height. e.g., a footnotesize baselineskip\n% is used before the object, thus an offset of, say -3pt, can be given as a\n% correction.\n\n% Common combinations of these parameters include:\n%\n% top baselineskip: (and default values for offset, prevdepth, etc.)\n% \\topskip % for objects that appear at the top of a page\n% \\maxdimen % always ignore the height of the top line\n% 0pt % always consider any positive height of the top line\n%\n% for objects to appear inline in normal text:\n% top baselineskip = \\baselineskip\n%\n% set prevdepth = -1000pt and top baselineskip = 0pt to consider the\n% overall height of the object without any other external skip\n% consideration\n\n\\newif\\if@IEEEquantizevspacestarform % flag to indicate star form\n\\newif\\if@IEEEquantizevspaceuseoutdimenreg % flag to indicate output dimen register is to be used\n% Use our own private registers because the object could contain a\n% structure that uses the existing tmp scratch pad registers\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEquantizeprevdepth % need to save this early as can change\n\\newcount\\@IEEEquantizemultiple\n\\newbox\\@IEEEquantizeboxA\n\n\n\\def\\@IEEEquantizevspace{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@IEEEquantizevspaceuseoutdimenregtrue\\@@IEEEquantizevspace}{\\@IEEEquantizevspaceuseoutdimenregfalse\\@@IEEEquantizevspace[]}}\n\n\n\\long\\def\\@@IEEEquantizevspace[#1]#2{\\relax\n% acquire and store\n% #1 optional output dimen register\n% #2 object\n\\edef\\@IEEEquantizeoutdimenreg{#1}\\relax\n% allow for object specifications that contain parameters\n\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA={#2}\\relax\n\\long\\edef\\@IEEEquantizeobject{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA}\\relax\n\\@ifnextchar [{\\@@@IEEEquantizevspace}{\\@@@IEEEquantizevspace[\\relax]}}\n\n\\long\\def\\@@@IEEEquantizevspace[#1]#2{\\relax\n% acquire and store\n% [#1] optional object decl, is \\relax if not given by user\n% #2 top baselineskip\n% allow for object decl specifications that have parameters\n\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA={#1}\\relax\n\\long\\edef\\@IEEEquantizeobjectdecl{\\the\\@IEEEtrantmptoksA}\\relax\n\\edef\\@IEEEquantizetopbaselineskip{#2}\\ivIEEEquantizevspace}\n\n% acquire optional argument set and store\n% [offset][prevdepth][lineskip limit][lineskip]\n\\def\\ivIEEEquantizevspace{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@vIEEEquantizevspace}{\\@vIEEEquantizevspace[0pt]}}\n\\def\\@vIEEEquantizevspace[#1]{\\edef\\@IEEEquantizeoffset{#1}\\@ifnextchar [{\\@viIEEEquantizevspace}{\\@viIEEEquantizevspace[\\prevdepth]}}\n\\def\\@viIEEEquantizevspace[#1]{\\@IEEEquantizeprevdepth=#1\\relax\\@ifnextchar [{\\@viiIEEEquantizevspace}{\\@viiIEEEquantizevspace[\\lineskiplimit]}}\n\\def\\@viiIEEEquantizevspace[#1]{\\edef\\@IEEEquantizelineskiplimit{#1}\\@ifnextchar [{\\@viiiIEEEquantizevspace}{\\@viiiIEEEquantizevspace[\\lineskip]}}\n\\def\\@viiiIEEEquantizevspace[#1]{\\edef\\@IEEEquantizelineskip{#1}\\@ixIEEEquantizevspace}\n\n% main routine\n\\def\\@ixIEEEquantizevspace#1#2#3{\\relax\n\\edef\\@IEEEquantizeunitheight{#1}\\relax\n\\edef\\@IEEEquantizenomvspace{#2}\\relax\n\\edef\\@IEEEquantizeminvspace{#3}\\relax\n% \\@IEEEquantizeoutdimenreg\n% \\@IEEEquantizeobject\n% \\@IEEEquantizeobjectdecl\n% \\@IEEEquantizetopbaselineskip\n% \\@IEEEquantizeoffset\n% \\@IEEEquantizeprevdepth\n% \\@IEEEquantizelineskiplimit\n% \\@IEEEquantizelineskip\n% \\@IEEEquantizeunitheight\n% \\@IEEEquantizenomvspace\n% \\@IEEEquantizeminvspace\n% get overall height of object\n\\setbox\\@IEEEquantizeboxA\\vbox{\\begingroup\\@IEEEquantizeobjectdecl\\@IEEEquantizeobject\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\ht\\@IEEEquantizeboxA\\relax\n% get height of first line of object\n\\setbox\\@IEEEquantizeboxA\\vtop{\\begingroup\\@IEEEquantizeobjectdecl\\@IEEEquantizeobject\\relax\\endgroup}\\relax\n\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\\ht\\@IEEEquantizeboxA\\relax\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEquantizeprevdepth>-1000pt\\relax % prevdepth > -1000pf means full baselineskip\\lineskip rules in effect\n% lineskip spacing rule takes effect if height of top line > baselineskip - prevdepth - lineskiplimit, \n% otherwise the baselineskip rule is in effect and the height of the first line does not matter at all.\n\\@IEEEquantizeheightC=\\@IEEEquantizetopbaselineskip\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightC-\\@IEEEquantizeprevdepth\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightC-\\@IEEEquantizelineskiplimit\\relax % this works even though \\@IEEEquantizelineskiplimit is a macro because TeX allows --10pt notation\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEquantizeheightB>\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\relax\n% lineskip spacing rule is in effect i.e., the object is going to be shifted down relative to the\n% baselineskip set position by its top line height (already a part of the total height) + prevdepth + lineskip - baselineskip\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\@IEEEquantizeprevdepth\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\@IEEEquantizelineskip\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA-\\@IEEEquantizetopbaselineskip\\relax\n\\else\n% height of first line <= \\@IEEEquantizetopbaselineskip - \\@IEEEquantizeprevdepth - \\@IEEEquantizelineskiplimit\n% standard baselineskip rules are in effect, so don't consider height of first line\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA-\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\\relax\n\\fi\n%\n\\else % prevdepth <= -1000pt, simplier \\topskip type rules in effect\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEquantizeheightB>\\@IEEEquantizetopbaselineskip\n% height of top line (already included in the total height) in excess of\n% baselineskip is the amount it will be downshifted\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA-\\@IEEEquantizetopbaselineskip\\relax\n\\else\n% height of first line is irrelevant, remove it\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA-\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\\relax\n\\fi\n\\fi % prevdepth <= -1000pt\n%\n% adjust height for any manual offset\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\@IEEEquantizeoffset\\relax\n% add in nominal spacer\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\@IEEEquantizenomvspace\\relax\n% check for nonzero unitheight\n\\@IEEEquantizeheightB=\\@IEEEquantizeunitheight\\relax\n\\ifnum\\@IEEEquantizeheightB=0\\relax\n\\@IEEEclspkgerror{IEEEquantizevspace unit height cannot be zero. Assuming 10pt.}%\n{Division by zero is not allowed.}\n\\@IEEEquantizeheightB=10pt\\relax\n\\fi\n% get integer number of lines\n\\@IEEEquantizemultiple=\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\relax\n\\divide\\@IEEEquantizemultiple\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\\relax\n% set A to contain the excess height over the \\@IEEEquantizemultiple of lines\n% A = height - multiple*unitheight\n\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\\relax\n\\multiply\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\@IEEEquantizemultiple\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightA-\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\relax\n% set B to contain the height short of \\@IEEEquantizemultiple+1 of lines\n% B = unitheight - A\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightB-\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\relax\n% choose A or B based on which is closer\n\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\@IEEEquantizenomvspace\\relax\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEquantizeheightA<\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\\relax\n% C = nomvspace - A, go with lower\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightC-\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\relax\n\\else\n% C = nomvspace + B, go with upper\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\\relax\n\\fi\n% if violate lower bound, use next integer bound\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEquantizeheightC<\\@IEEEquantizeminvspace\\relax\n% A + B = unitheight\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\@IEEEquantizeheightA\\relax\n\\advance\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\@IEEEquantizeheightB\\relax\n\\fi\n% export object and spacer outside of group\n\\global\\let\\@IEEEquantizeobjectout\\@IEEEquantizeobject\\relax\n\\global\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\relax\n\\endgroup\n\\if@IEEEquantizevspaceuseoutdimenreg\n\\@IEEEquantizeoutdimenreg=\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\relax\n\\else\n\\@IEEEquantizeobjectout\\relax\n\\vskip\\@IEEEquantizeheightC\\relax\n\\fi}\n\n\n% user command to disable all global assignments, possible use within object decl\n\\def\\IEEEquantizedisableglobal{\\let\\global\\relax\n\\let\\gdef\\def\n\\let\\xdef\\edef}\n% user command to allow for the disabling of \\thanks and other commands, possible use within object decl\n\\def\\IEEEquantizedisabletitlecmds{\\long\\def\\thanks##1{\\relax}\\relax\n\\long\\def\\IEEEcompsocitemizethanks##1{\\relax}\\def\\newpage{\\relax}}\n\n\n\n\n\n% V1.6\n% we allow the user access to the last part of the title area\n% useful in emergencies such as when a different spacing is needed\n% This text is NOT compensated for in the dynamic sizer.\n\\let\\@IEEEaftertitletext=\\relax\n\\long\\def\\IEEEaftertitletext#1{\\def\\@IEEEaftertitletext{#1}}\n\n\n% V1.7 provide a way for users to enter abstract and keywords\n% into the onecolumn title are. This text is compensated for\n% in the dynamic sizer.\n\\let\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext=\\relax\n\\long\\def\\IEEEtitleabstractindextext#1{\\def\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext{#1}}\n\n% V1.7 provide a way for users to get the \\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext if\n% not in compsoc or transmag journal mode - this way abstract and keywords\n% can still be placed in their conventional position if not in those modes.\n\\def\\IEEEdisplaynontitleabstractindextext{%\n% display for all conference formats\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext\\relax\n\\else% non-conferences\n % V1.8a display for all technotes\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote\\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext\\relax\n % V1.8a add diamond line after abstract and index terms for compsoc technotes\n \\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\noindent\\hfill\\IEEEcompsocdiamondline\\hfill\\hbox{}\\par}\\relax\n \\else % non-conferences and non-technotes\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc% display if not compsoc and not transmag\n \\else\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\n \\else% not compsoc journal nor transmag journal\n \\@IEEEtitleabstractindextext\\relax\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi}\n\n\n% command to allow alteration of baselinestretch, but only if the current\n% baselineskip is unity. Used to tweak the compsoc abstract and keywords line spacing.\n\\def\\@IEEEtweakunitybaselinestretch#1{{\\def\\baselinestretch{1}\\selectfont\n\\global\\@tempskipa\\baselineskip}\\ifnum\\@tempskipa=\\baselineskip%\n\\def\\baselinestretch{#1}\\selectfont\\fi\\relax}\n\n\n% abstract and keywords are in \\small, except \n% for 9pt docs in which they are in \\footnotesize\n% Because 9pt docs use an 8pt footnotesize, \\small\n% becomes a rather awkward 8.5pt\n\\def\\@IEEEabskeysecsize{\\small}\n\\ifx\\CLASSOPTIONpt\\@IEEEptsizenine\n \\def\\@IEEEabskeysecsize{\\footnotesize}\n\\fi\n\n% compsoc journals use \\footnotesize, compsoc conferences use normalsize\n\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\def\\@IEEEabskeysecsize{\\footnotesize}}\n\\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\def\\@IEEEabskeysecsize{\\small}}\n\n\n% V1.6 have abstract and keywords strip leading spaces, pars and newlines\n% so that spacing is more tightly controlled.\n\\def\\abstract{\\normalfont\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\bfseries\\textit{\\abstractname}---\\relax\n \\else\n \\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering\\vspace{-1.78ex}\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\textbf{\\abstractname}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup\\quotation\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\n \\fi\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}\n% V1.6 The IEEE wants only 1 pica from end of abstract to introduction heading when in \n% conference mode (the heading already has this much above it)\n\\def\\endabstract{\\relax\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\\vspace{0ex}\\else\\vspace{1.34ex}\\fi\\par\\if@twocolumn\\else\\endquotation\\fi\n \\normalfont\\normalsize}\n\n\\def\\IEEEkeywords{\\normalfont\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\bfseries\\textit{\\IEEEkeywordsname}---\\relax\n \\else\n \\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\textbf{\\IEEEkeywordsname}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup\\quotation\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\n \\fi\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}\n\\def\\endIEEEkeywords{\\relax\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote\\vspace{1.34ex}\\else\\vspace{0.67ex}\\fi\n \\par\\if@twocolumn\\else\\endquotation\\fi%\n \\normalfont\\normalsize}\n\n% V1.7 compsoc keywords index terms\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONconference% compsoc conference\n\\def\\abstract{\\normalfont\\@IEEEtweakunitybaselinestretch{1.15}\\bfseries\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\noindent\\textit{\\abstractname}---\\relax\n \\else\n \\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering\\vspace{-1.78ex}\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\textbf{\\abstractname}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup\\quotation\\@IEEEabskeysecsize%\n \\fi\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}\n\\def\\IEEEkeywords{\\normalfont\\@IEEEtweakunitybaselinestretch{1.15}\\bfseries\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\vskip 0.5\\baselineskip plus 0.25\\baselineskip minus 0.25\\baselineskip\\noindent\n \\textit{\\IEEEkeywordsname}---\\relax\n \\else\n \\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\textbf{\\IEEEkeywordsname}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup\\quotation\\@IEEEabskeysecsize%\n \\fi\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}\n \\else% compsoc not conference\n\\def\\abstract{\\normalfont\\@IEEEtweakunitybaselinestretch{1.15}\\sffamily\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\noindent\\textbf{\\abstractname}---\\relax\n \\else\n \\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering\\vspace{-1.78ex}\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\textbf{\\abstractname}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup\\quotation\\@IEEEabskeysecsize%\n \\fi\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}\n\\def\\IEEEkeywords{\\normalfont\\@IEEEtweakunitybaselinestretch{1.15}\\sffamily\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\vskip 0.5\\baselineskip plus 0.25\\baselineskip minus 0.25\\baselineskip\\noindent\n \\textbf{\\IEEEkeywordsname}---\\relax\n \\else\n \\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\textbf{\\IEEEkeywordsname}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup\\quotation\\@IEEEabskeysecsize%\n \\fi\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n% V1.8 transmag keywords index terms\n% no abstract name, use indentation\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\n\\def\\abstract{\\normalfont\\parindent 1em\\relax\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\bfseries\\indent\n \\else\n \\bgroup\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\centering\\vspace{-1.78ex}\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\n \\textbf{\\abstractname}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup\\quotation\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\n \\fi\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}\n\n\\def\\IEEEkeywords{\\normalfont\\parindent 1em\\relax\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@IEEEabskeysecsize\\vspace{1\\baselineskip}\\bfseries\\indent\\textit{\\IEEEkeywordsname}---\\relax\n \\else\n \\bgroup\\par\\vspace{1\\baselineskip}\\centering\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\n \\textbf{\\IEEEkeywordsname}\\par\\addvspace{0.5\\baselineskip}\\egroup\\quotation\\@IEEEabskeysecsize\n \\fi\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% gobbles all leading \\, \\\\ and \\par, upon finding first token that\n% is not a \\ , \\\\ or a \\par, it ceases and returns that token\n% \n% used to strip leading \\, \\\\ and \\par from the input\n% so that such things in the beginning of an environment will not\n% affect the formatting of the text\n\\long\\def\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP#1{\\let\\@IEEEswallowthistoken=0%\n\\let\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSPtoken#1%\n\\let\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARtoken=\\par%\n\\let\\@IEEEgobbleleadNLtoken=\\\\%\n\\let\\@IEEEgobbleleadSPtoken=\\ %\n\\def\\@IEEEgobbleleadSPMACRO{\\ }%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSPtoken\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARtoken%\n\\let\\@IEEEswallowthistoken=1%\n\\fi%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSPtoken\\@IEEEgobbleleadNLtoken%\n\\let\\@IEEEswallowthistoken=1%\n\\fi%\n\\ifx\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSPtoken\\@IEEEgobbleleadSPtoken%\n\\let\\@IEEEswallowthistoken=1%\n\\fi%\n% a control space will come in as a macro\n% when it is the last one on a line\n\\ifx\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSPtoken\\@IEEEgobbleleadSPMACRO%\n\\let\\@IEEEswallowthistoken=1%\n\\fi%\n% if we have to swallow this token, do so and taste the next one\n% else spit it out and stop gobbling\n\\ifx\\@IEEEswallowthistoken 1\\let\\@IEEEnextgobbleleadPARNLSP=\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP\\else%\n\\let\\@IEEEnextgobbleleadPARNLSP=#1\\fi%\n\\@IEEEnextgobbleleadPARNLSP}%\n\n\n\n\n% TITLING OF SECTIONS\n\\def\\@IEEEsectpunct{:\\ \\,} % Punctuation after run-in section heading (headings which are\n % part of the paragraphs), need little bit more than a single space\n % spacing from section number to title\n% compsoc conferences use regular period/space punctuation\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n\\def\\@IEEEsectpunct{.\\ }\n\\fi\\fi\n\n\n\\def\\@seccntformat#1{\\csname the#1dis\\endcsname\\hskip 0.5em\\relax}\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n% compsoc journals need extra spacing\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\\else\n\\def\\@seccntformat#1{\\csname the#1dis\\endcsname\\hskip 1em\\relax}\n\\fi\\fi\n\n%v1.7 put {} after #6 to allow for some types of user font control\n%and use \\@@par rather than \\par\n\\def\\@sect#1#2#3#4#5#6[#7]#8{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth\n \\let\\@svsec\\@empty\n \\else\n \\refstepcounter{#1}%\n % load section label and spacer into \\@svsec\n \\protected@edef\\@svsec{\\@seccntformat{#1}\\relax}%\n \\fi%\n \\@tempskipa #5\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@% tempskipa determines whether is treated as a high\n \\begingroup #6{\\relax% or low level heading\n \\noindent % subsections are NOT indented\n % print top level headings. \\@svsec is label, #8 is heading title\n % The IEEE does not block indent the section title text, it flows like normal\n {\\hskip #3\\relax\\@svsec}{\\interlinepenalty \\@M #8\\@@par}}%\n \\endgroup\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{\\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth\\relax\\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}\\fi#7}%\n \\else % printout low level headings\n % svsechd seems to swallow the trailing space, protect it with \\mbox{}\n % got rid of sectionmark stuff\n \\def\\@svsechd{#6{\\hskip #3\\relax\\@svsec #8\\@IEEEsectpunct\\mbox{}}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{\\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth\\relax\\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}\\fi#7}}%\n \\fi%skip down\n \\@xsect{#5}}\n\n\n% section* handler\n%v1.7 put {} after #4 to allow for some types of user font control\n%and use \\@@par rather than \\par\n\\def\\@ssect#1#2#3#4#5{\\@tempskipa #3\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n %\\begingroup #4\\@hangfrom{\\hskip #1}{\\interlinepenalty \\@M #5\\par}\\endgroup\n % The IEEE does not block indent the section title text, it flows like normal\n \\begingroup \\noindent #4{\\relax{\\hskip #1}{\\interlinepenalty \\@M #5\\@@par}}\\endgroup\n % svsechd swallows the trailing space, protect it with \\mbox{}\n \\else \\def\\@svsechd{#4{\\hskip #1\\relax #5\\@IEEEsectpunct\\mbox{}}}\\fi\n \\@xsect{#3}}\n\n\n%% SECTION heading spacing and font\n%%\n% arguments are: #1 - sectiontype name\n% (for \\@sect) #2 - section level\n% #3 - section heading indent\n% #4 - top separation (absolute value used, neg indicates not to indent main text)\n% If negative, make stretch parts negative too!\n% #5 - (absolute value used) positive: bottom separation after heading,\n% negative: amount to indent main text after heading\n% Both #4 and #5 negative means to indent main text and use negative top separation\n% #6 - font control\n% You've got to have \\normalfont\\normalsize in the font specs below to prevent\n% trouble when you do something like:\n% \\section{Note}{\\ttfamily TT-TEXT} is known to ... \n% The IEEE sometimes REALLY stretches the area before a section\n% heading by up to about 0.5in. However, it may not be a good\n% idea to let LaTeX have quite this much rubber.\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference%\n% The IEEE wants section heading spacing to decrease for conference mode\n\\def\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}{1.5ex plus 1.5ex minus 0.5ex}%\n{0.7ex plus 1ex minus 0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\centering\\scshape}}%\n\\def\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}{1.5ex plus 1.5ex minus 0.5ex}%\n{0.7ex plus .5ex minus 0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}%\n\\else % for journals\n\\def\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}{3.0ex plus 1.5ex minus 1.5ex}% V1.6 3.0ex from 3.5ex\n{0.7ex plus 1ex minus 0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\centering\\scshape}}%\n\\def\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}{3.5ex plus 1.5ex minus 1.5ex}%\n{0.7ex plus .5ex minus 0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}%\n\\fi\n\n% for both journals and conferences\n% decided to put in a little rubber above the section, might help somebody\n\\def\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\parindent}{0ex plus 0.1ex minus 0.1ex}%\n{0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}%\n\\def\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{2\\parindent}{0ex plus 0.1ex minus 0.1ex}%\n{0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}%\n\n\n% compsoc\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n% compsoc conference\n\\def\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}{1\\baselineskip plus 0.25\\baselineskip minus 0.25\\baselineskip}%\n{1\\baselineskip plus 0.25\\baselineskip minus 0.25\\baselineskip}{\\normalfont\\large\\bfseries}}%\n\\def\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}{1\\baselineskip plus 0.25\\baselineskip minus 0.25\\baselineskip}%\n{1\\baselineskip plus 0.25\\baselineskip minus 0.25\\baselineskip}{\\normalfont\\sublargesize\\bfseries}}%\n\\def\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}{1\\baselineskip plus 0.25\\baselineskip minus 0.25\\baselineskip}%\n{0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries}}%\n\\def\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{2\\parindent}{0ex plus 0.1ex minus 0.1ex}%\n{0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize}}%\n\\else% compsoc journals\n% use negative top separation as compsoc journals do not indent paragraphs after section titles\n\\def\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}{-3.5ex plus -2ex minus -1.5ex}%\n{0.7ex plus 1ex minus 0ex}{\\normalfont\\sublargesize\\sffamily\\bfseries\\scshape}}%\n% Note that subsection and smaller may not be correct for the Computer Society,\n% I have to look up an example.\n\\def\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}{-3.5ex plus -1.5ex minus -1.5ex}%\n{0.7ex plus .5ex minus 0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\sffamily\\bfseries}}%\n\\def\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}{-2.5ex plus -1ex minus -1ex}%\n{0.5ex plus 0.5ex minus 0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\sffamily\\itshape}}%\n\\def\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{2\\parindent}{-0ex plus -0.1ex minus -0.1ex}%\n{0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize}}%\n\\fi\\fi\n\n% transmag\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtransmag\n\\def\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{0.75\\parindent}{3.5ex plus 1.5ex minus 1.5ex}%\n{0.7ex plus .5ex minus 0ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}%\n\\def\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{1.25\\parindent}{0.1ex plus 0.1ex minus 0.1ex}%\n{0.1ex}{\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}%\n\\fi\n\n\n% V1.8a provide for a raised line Introduction section for use with Computer\n% Society papers. We have to remove any spacing glue after the section\n% heading and then remove the blank line for the new paragraph after it.\n% LaTeX's section handler alters \\everypar and we need to propogate those\n% changes outside of the \\parbox lest there be spacing problems at the top\n% of the next section.\n\\def\\IEEEraisesectionheading#1{\\noindent\\raisebox{1.5\\baselineskip}[0pt][0pt]{\\parbox[b]{\\columnwidth}{#1\\unskip\\global\\everypar=\\everypar}}\\vspace{-1\\baselineskip}\\vspace{-\\parskip}\\par}\n\n\n\n%% ENVIRONMENTS\n% \"box\" symbols at end of proofs\n\\def\\IEEEQEDclosed{\\mbox{\\rule[0pt]{1.3ex}{1.3ex}}} % for a filled box\n% V1.6 some journals use an open box instead that will just fit around a closed one\n\\def\\IEEEQEDopen{{\\setlength{\\fboxsep}{0pt}\\setlength{\\fboxrule}{0.2pt}\\fbox{\\rule[0pt]{0pt}{1.3ex}\\rule[0pt]{1.3ex}{0pt}}}}\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\def\\IEEEQED{\\IEEEQEDopen} % default to open for compsoc\n\\else\n\\def\\IEEEQED{\\IEEEQEDclosed} % otherwise default to closed\n\\fi\n\n%V1.8 flag to indicate if QED symbol is to be shown\n\\newif\\if@IEEEQEDshow \\@IEEEQEDshowtrue\n\\def\\IEEEproofindentspace{2\\parindent}% V1.8 allow user to change indentation amount if desired\n% v1.7 name change to avoid namespace collision with amsthm. Also add support\n% for an optional argument.\n\\def\\IEEEproof{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@IEEEproof}{\\@IEEEproof[\\IEEEproofname]}}\n\\def\\@IEEEproof[#1]{\\@IEEEQEDshowtrue\\par\\noindent\\hspace{\\IEEEproofindentspace}{\\itshape #1: }}\n\\def\\endIEEEproof{\\if@IEEEQEDshow\\hspace*{\\fill}\\nobreakspace\\IEEEQED\\fi\\par}\n% qedhere for equation environments, similar to AMS \\qedhere\n\\def\\IEEEQEDhereeqn{\\global\\@IEEEQEDshowfalse\\eqno\\let\\eqno\\relax\\let\\leqno\\relax\n \\let\\veqno\\relax\\hbox{\\IEEEQED}}\n% IEEE style qedhere for IEEEeqnarray and other environments\n\\def\\IEEEQEDhere{\\global\\@IEEEQEDshowfalse\\IEEEQED}\n% command to disable QED at end of IEEEproof\n\\def\\IEEEQEDoff{\\global\\@IEEEQEDshowfalse}\n\n\n%\\itemindent is set to \\z@ by list, so define new temporary variable\n\\newdimen\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n% V1.8a compsoc uses bold theorem titles, a period instead of a colon, vertical spacing, and hanging indentation\n% V1.8 allow long theorem names to break across lines.\n% Thanks to Miquel Payaro for reporting this.\n\\def\\@begintheorem#1#2{\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\\itemindent\\relax\n \\topsep 0.2\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip plus 0.26\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip minus 0.05\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\n \\rmfamily\\trivlist\\hangindent\\parindent%\n \\item[]\\textit{\\bfseries\\noindent #1\\ #2.} \\itemindent\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\\relax}\n\\def\\@opargbegintheorem#1#2#3{\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\\itemindent\\relax\n\\topsep 0.2\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip plus 0.26\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip minus 0.05\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip\n\\rmfamily\\trivlist\\hangindent\\parindent%\n% V1.6 The IEEE is back to using () around theorem names which are also in italics\n% Thanks to Christian Peel for reporting this.\n \\item[]\\textit{\\bfseries\\noindent #1\\ #2\\ (#3).} \\itemindent\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\\relax}\n% V1.7 remove bogus \\unskip that caused equations in theorems to collide with\n% lines below.\n\\def\\@endtheorem{\\endtrivlist\\vskip 0.25\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip plus 0.26\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip minus 0.05\\@IEEEnormalsizeunitybaselineskip}\n\\else\n%\n% noncompsoc\n% \n% V1.8 allow long theorem names to break across lines.\n% Thanks to Miquel Payaro for reporting this.\n\\def\\@begintheorem#1#2{\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\\itemindent\\relax\\topsep 0pt\\rmfamily\\trivlist%\n \\item[]\\textit{\\indent #1\\ #2:} \\itemindent\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\\relax}\n\\def\\@opargbegintheorem#1#2#3{\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\\itemindent\\relax\\topsep 0pt\\rmfamily \\trivlist%\n% V1.6 The IEEE is back to using () around theorem names which are also in italics\n% Thanks to Christian Peel for reporting this.\n \\item[]\\textit{\\indent #1\\ #2\\ (#3):} \\itemindent\\@IEEEtmpitemindent\\relax}\n% V1.7 remove bogus \\unskip that caused equations in theorems to collide with\n% lines below.\n\\def\\@endtheorem{\\endtrivlist}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n% V1.6\n% display command for the section the theorem is in - so that \\thesection\n% is not used as this will be in Roman numerals when we want arabic.\n% LaTeX2e uses \\def\\@thmcounter#1{\\noexpand\\arabic{#1}} for the theorem number\n% (second part) display and \\def\\@thmcountersep{.} as a separator.\n% V1.7 intercept calls to the section counter and reroute to \\@IEEEthmcounterinsection\n% to allow \\appendix(ices} to override as needed.\n%\n% special handler for sections, allows appendix(ices) to override\n\\gdef\\@IEEEthmcounterinsection#1{\\arabic{#1}}\n% string macro\n\\edef\\@IEEEstringsection{section}\n\n% redefine the #1#2[#3] form of newtheorem to use a hook to \\@IEEEthmcounterinsection\n% if section in_counter is used\n\\def\\@xnthm#1#2[#3]{%\n \\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\@definecounter{#1}\\@newctr{#1}[#3]%\n \\edef\\@IEEEstringtmp{#3}\n \\ifx\\@IEEEstringtmp\\@IEEEstringsection\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname the#1\\endcsname{%\n \\noexpand\\@IEEEthmcounterinsection{#3}\\@thmcountersep\n \\@thmcounter{#1}}%\n \\else\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname the#1\\endcsname{%\n \\expandafter\\noexpand\\csname the#3\\endcsname \\@thmcountersep\n \\@thmcounter{#1}}%\n \\fi\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@thm{#1}{#2}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}\n\n\n\n%% SET UP THE DEFAULT PAGESTYLE\n\\pagestyle{headings}\n\\pagenumbering{arabic}\n\n% normally the page counter starts at 1\n\\setcounter{page}{1}\n% however, for peerreview the cover sheet is page 0 or page -1\n% (for duplex printing)\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview\n \\if@twoside\n \\setcounter{page}{-1}\n \\else\n \\setcounter{page}{0}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n% standard book class behavior - let bottom line float up and down as\n% needed when single sided\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtwoside\\else\\raggedbottom\\fi\n% if two column - turn on twocolumn, allow word spacings to stretch more and\n% enforce a rigid position for the last lines\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtwocolumn\n% the peer review option delays invoking twocolumn\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview\\else\n \\twocolumn\n \\fi\n\\sloppy \n\\flushbottom\n\\fi\n\n\n\n\n% \\APPENDIX and \\APPENDICES definitions\n\n% This is the \\@ifmtarg command from the LaTeX ifmtarg package\n% by Peter Wilson (CUA) and Donald Arseneau\n% \\@ifmtarg is used to determine if an argument to a command\n% is present or not.\n% For instance:\n% \\@ifmtarg{#1}{\\typeout{empty}}{\\typeout{has something}}\n% \\@ifmtarg is used with our redefined \\section command if\n% \\appendices is invoked.\n% The command \\section will behave slightly differently depending\n% on whether the user specifies a title: \n% \\section{My appendix title}\n% or not:\n% \\section{}\n% This way, we can eliminate the blank lines where the title\n% would be, and the unneeded : after Appendix in the table of\n% contents \n\\begingroup\n\\catcode`\\Q=3\n\\long\\gdef\\@ifmtarg#1{\\@xifmtarg#1QQ\\@secondoftwo\\@firstoftwo\\@nil}\n\\long\\gdef\\@xifmtarg#1#2Q#3#4#5\\@nil{#4}\n\\endgroup\n% end of \\@ifmtarg defs\n\n\n% V1.7\n% command that allows the one time saving of the original definition\n% of section to \\@IEEEappendixsavesection for \\appendix or \\appendices \n% we don't save \\section here as it may be redefined later by other\n% packages (hyperref.sty, etc.)\n\\def\\@IEEEsaveoriginalsectiononce{\\let\\@IEEEappendixsavesection\\section\n\\let\\@IEEEsaveoriginalsectiononce\\relax}\n\n% neat trick to grab and process the argument from \\section{argument}\n% we process differently if the user invoked \\section{} with no\n% argument (title)\n% note we reroute the call to the old \\section*\n\\def\\@IEEEprocessthesectionargument#1{%\n\\@ifmtarg{#1}{%\n\\@IEEEappendixsavesection*{\\appendixname\\nobreakspace\\thesectiondis}%\n\\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\\appendixname\\nobreakspace\\thesection}}{%\n\\@IEEEappendixsavesection*{\\appendixname\\nobreakspace\\thesectiondis\\\\* #1}%\n\\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\\appendixname\\nobreakspace\\thesection: #1}}}\n\n% we use this if the user calls \\section{} after\n% \\appendix-- which has no meaning. So, we ignore the\n% command and its argument. Then, warn the user.\n\\def\\@IEEEdestroythesectionargument#1{\\typeout{** WARNING: Ignoring useless\n\\protect\\section\\space in Appendix (line \\the\\inputlineno).}}\n\n\n% remember \\thesection forms will be displayed in \\ref calls\n% and in the Table of Contents.\n% The \\sectiondis form is used in the actual heading itself\n\n% appendix command for one single appendix\n% normally has no heading. However, if you want a \n% heading, you can do so via the optional argument:\n% \\appendix[Optional Heading]\n\\def\\appendix{\\relax}\n\\renewcommand{\\appendix}[1][]{\\@IEEEsaveoriginalsectiononce\\par\n % v1.6 keep hyperref's identifiers unique\n \\gdef\\theHsection{Appendix.A}%\n % v1.6 adjust hyperref's string name for the section\n \\xdef\\Hy@chapapp{appendix}%\n \\setcounter{section}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsubsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{paragraph}{0}%\n \\gdef\\thesection{A}%\n \\gdef\\thesectiondis{}% \n \\gdef\\thesubsection{\\Alph{subsection}}%\n \\gdef\\@IEEEthmcounterinsection##1{A}\n \\refstepcounter{section}% update the \\ref counter\n \\@ifmtarg{#1}{\\@IEEEappendixsavesection*{\\appendixname}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\\appendixname}}{%\n \\@IEEEappendixsavesection*{\\appendixname\\nobreakspace\\\\* #1}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\\appendixname: #1}}%\n % redefine \\section command for appendix\n % leave \\section* as is\n \\def\\section{\\@ifstar{\\@IEEEappendixsavesection*}{%\n \\@IEEEdestroythesectionargument}}% throw out the argument\n % of the normal form\n}\n\n\n\n% appendices command for multiple appendices\n% user then calls \\section with an argument (possibly empty) to\n% declare the individual appendices\n\\def\\appendices{\\@IEEEsaveoriginalsectiononce\\par\n % v1.6 keep hyperref's identifiers unique\n \\gdef\\theHsection{Appendix.\\Alph{section}}%\n % v1.6 adjust hyperref's string name for the section\n \\xdef\\Hy@chapapp{appendix}%\n \\setcounter{section}{-1}% we want \\refstepcounter to use section 0\n \\setcounter{subsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsubsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{paragraph}{0}%\n \\ifCLASSOPTIONromanappendices%\n \\gdef\\thesection{\\Roman{section}}%\n \\gdef\\thesectiondis{\\Roman{section}}%\n \\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\gdef\\thesectiondis{\\Roman{section}.}}%\n \\gdef\\@IEEEthmcounterinsection##1{A\\arabic{##1}}\n \\else%\n \\gdef\\thesection{\\Alph{section}}%\n \\gdef\\thesectiondis{\\Alph{section}}%\n \\@IEEEcompsocconfonly{\\gdef\\thesectiondis{\\Alph{section}.}}%\n \\gdef\\@IEEEthmcounterinsection##1{\\Alph{##1}}\n \\fi%\n \\refstepcounter{section}% update the \\ref counter\n \\setcounter{section}{0}% NEXT \\section will be the FIRST appendix\n % redefine \\section command for appendices\n % leave \\section* as is\n \\def\\section{\\@ifstar{\\@IEEEappendixsavesection*}{% process the *-form\n \\refstepcounter{section}% or is a new section so,\n \\@IEEEprocessthesectionargument}}% process the argument \n % of the normal form\n}\n\n\n\n% V1.7 compoc uses nonbold drop cap and small caps word style\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\def\\IEEEPARstartFONTSTYLE{\\mdseries}\n \\def\\IEEEPARstartWORDFONTSTYLE{\\scshape}\n \\def\\IEEEPARstartWORDCAPSTYLE{\\relax}\n\\fi\n%\n%\n% \\IEEEPARstart\n% Definition for the big two line drop cap letter at the beginning of the\n% first paragraph of journal papers. The first argument is the first letter\n% of the first word, the second argument is the remaining letters of the\n% first word which will be rendered in upper case.\n% In V1.6 this has been completely rewritten to:\n% \n% 1. no longer have problems when the user begins an environment\n% within the paragraph that uses \\IEEEPARstart.\n% 2. auto-detect and use the current font family\n% 3. revise handling of the space at the end of the first word so that\n% interword glue will now work as normal.\n% 4. produce correctly aligned edges for the (two) indented lines.\n% \n% We generalize things via control macros - playing with these is fun too.\n% \n% V1.7 added more control macros to make it easy for IEEEtrantools.sty users\n% to change the font style.\n% \n% the number of lines that are indented to clear it\n% may need to increase if using decenders\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartDROPLINES}{2}\n% minimum number of lines left on a page to allow a \\@IEEEPARstart\n% Does not take into consideration rubber shrink, so it tends to\n% be overly cautious\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartMINPAGELINES}{2}\n% V1.7 the height of the drop cap is adjusted to match the height of this text\n% in the current font (when \\IEEEPARstart is called).\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartHEIGHTTEXT}{T}\n% the depth the letter is lowered below the baseline\n% the height (and size) of the letter is determined by the sum\n% of this value and the height of the \\IEEEPARstartHEIGHTTEXT in the current\n% font. It is a good idea to set this value in terms of the baselineskip\n% so that it can respond to changes therein.\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartDROPDEPTH}{1.1\\baselineskip}\n% V1.7 the font the drop cap will be rendered in,\n% can take zero or one argument.\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartFONTSTYLE}{\\bfseries}\n% V1.7 any additional, non-font related commands needed to modify\n% the drop cap letter, can take zero or one argument.\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartCAPSTYLE}{\\MakeUppercase}\n% V1.7 the font that will be used to render the rest of the word,\n% can take zero or one argument.\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartWORDFONTSTYLE}{\\relax}\n% V1.7 any additional, non-font related commands needed to modify\n% the rest of the word, can take zero or one argument.\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartWORDCAPSTYLE}{\\MakeUppercase}\n% This is the horizontal separation distance from the drop letter to the main text.\n% Lengths that depend on the font (e.g., ex, em, etc.) will be referenced\n% to the font that is active when \\IEEEPARstart is called. \n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartSEP}{0.15em}\n% V1.7 horizontal offset applied to the left of the drop cap.\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartHOFFSET}{0em}\n% V1.7 Italic correction command applied at the end of the drop cap.\n\\providecommand{\\IEEEPARstartITLCORRECT}{\\/}\n\n% width of the letter output, set globally. Can be used in \\IEEEPARstartSEP\n% or \\IEEEPARstartHOFFSET, but not the height lengths.\n\\newdimen\\IEEEPARstartletwidth\n\\IEEEPARstartletwidth 0pt\\relax\n\n% definition of \\IEEEPARstart\n% THIS IS A CONTROLLED SPACING AREA, DO NOT ALLOW SPACES WITHIN THESE LINES\n% \n% The token \\@IEEEPARstartfont will be globally defined after the first use\n% of \\IEEEPARstart and will be a font command which creates the big letter\n% The first argument is the first letter of the first word and the second\n% argument is the rest of the first word(s).\n\\def\\IEEEPARstart#1#2{\\par{%\n% if this page does not have enough space, break it and lets start\n% on a new one\n\\@IEEEtranneedspace{\\IEEEPARstartMINPAGELINES\\baselineskip}{\\relax}%\n% V1.7 move this up here in case user uses \\textbf for \\IEEEPARstartFONTSTYLE\n% which uses command \\leavevmode which causes an unwanted \\indent to be issued\n\\noindent\n% calculate the desired height of the big letter\n% it extends from the top of \\IEEEPARstartHEIGHTTEXT in the current font\n% down to \\IEEEPARstartDROPDEPTH below the current baseline\n\\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\IEEEPARstartHEIGHTTEXT}%\n\\addtolength{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\IEEEPARstartDROPDEPTH}%\n% extract the name of the current font in bold\n% and place it in \\@IEEEPARstartFONTNAME\n\\def\\@IEEEPARstartGETFIRSTWORD##1 ##2\\relax{##1}%\n{\\IEEEPARstartFONTSTYLE{\\selectfont\\edef\\@IEEEPARstartFONTNAMESPACE{\\fontname\\font\\space}%\n\\xdef\\@IEEEPARstartFONTNAME{\\expandafter\\@IEEEPARstartGETFIRSTWORD\\@IEEEPARstartFONTNAMESPACE\\relax}}}%\n% define a font based on this name with a point size equal to the desired\n% height of the drop letter\n\\font\\@IEEEPARstartsubfont\\@IEEEPARstartFONTNAME\\space at \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax%\n% save this value as a counter (integer) value (sp points)\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA=\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA%\n% now get the height of the actual letter produced by this font size\n\\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}{\\@IEEEPARstartsubfont\\IEEEPARstartCAPSTYLE{#1}}%\n% If something bogus happens like the first argument is empty or the\n% current font is strange, do not allow a zero height.\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB=0pt\\relax%\n\\typeout{** WARNING: IEEEPARstart drop letter has zero height! (line \\the\\inputlineno)}%\n\\typeout{ Forcing the drop letter font size to 10pt.}%\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB=10pt%\n\\fi%\n% and store it as a counter\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB=\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB%\n% Since a font size doesn't exactly correspond to the height of the capital\n% letters in that font, the actual height of the letter, \\@IEEEtrantmpcountB,\n% will be less than that desired, \\@IEEEtrantmpcountA\n% we need to raise the font size, \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA \n% by \\@IEEEtrantmpcountA / \\@IEEEtrantmpcountB\n% But, TeX doesn't have floating point division, so we have to use integer\n% division. Hence the use of the counters.\n% We need to reduce the denominator so that the loss of the remainder will\n% have minimal affect on the accuracy of the result\n\\divide\\@IEEEtrantmpcountB by 200%\n\\divide\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA by \\@IEEEtrantmpcountB%\n% Then reequalize things when we use TeX's ability to multiply by\n% floating point values\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB=0.005\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA%\n\\multiply\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB by \\@IEEEtrantmpcountA%\n% \\@IEEEPARstartfont is globaly set to the calculated font of the big letter\n% We need to carry this out of the local calculation area to to create the\n% big letter.\n\\global\\font\\@IEEEPARstartfont\\@IEEEPARstartFONTNAME\\space at \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB%\n% Now set \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA to the width of the big letter\n% We need to carry this out of the local calculation area to set the\n% hanging indent\n\\settowidth{\\global\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\@IEEEPARstartfont\n\\IEEEPARstartCAPSTYLE{#1\\IEEEPARstartITLCORRECT}}}%\n% end of the isolated calculation environment\n\\global\\IEEEPARstartletwidth\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\\relax%\n% add in the extra clearance we want\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by \\IEEEPARstartSEP\\relax%\n% add in the optional offset\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by \\IEEEPARstartHOFFSET\\relax%\n% V1.7 don't allow negative offsets to produce negative hanging indents\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA\n\\ifnum\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB < 0 \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB 0pt\\fi\n% \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA has the width of the big letter plus the\n% separation space and \\@IEEEPARstartfont is the font we need to use\n% Now, we make the letter and issue the hanging indent command\n% The letter is placed in a box of zero width and height so that other\n% text won't be displaced by it.\n\\hangindent\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\hangafter=-\\IEEEPARstartDROPLINES%\n\\makebox[0pt][l]{\\hspace{-\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}%\n\\raisebox{-\\IEEEPARstartDROPDEPTH}[0pt][0pt]{\\hspace{\\IEEEPARstartHOFFSET}%\n\\@IEEEPARstartfont\\IEEEPARstartCAPSTYLE{#1\\IEEEPARstartITLCORRECT}%\n\\hspace{\\IEEEPARstartSEP}}}%\n{\\IEEEPARstartWORDFONTSTYLE{\\IEEEPARstartWORDCAPSTYLE{\\selectfont#2}}}}\n\n\n\n\n% determines if the space remaining on a given page is equal to or greater\n% than the specified space of argument one\n% if not, execute argument two (only if the remaining space is greater than zero)\n% and issue a \\newpage\n% \n% example: \\@IEEEtranneedspace{2in}{\\vfill}\n% \n% Does not take into consideration rubber shrinkage, so it tends to\n% be overly cautious\n% Based on an example posted by Donald Arseneau\n% Note this macro uses \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB internally for calculations,\n% so DO NOT PASS \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB to this routine\n% if you need a dimen register, import with \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA instead\n\\def\\@IEEEtranneedspace#1#2{\\penalty-100\\begingroup%shield temp variable\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\pagegoal\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB-\\pagetotal% space left\n\\ifdim #1>\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB\\relax% not enough space left\n\\ifdim\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB>\\z@\\relax #2\\fi%\n\\newpage%\n\\fi\\endgroup}\n\n\n\n% IEEEbiography ENVIRONMENT\n% Allows user to enter biography leaving place for picture (adapts to font size)\n% As of V1.5, a new optional argument allows you to have a real graphic!\n% V1.5 and later also fixes the \"colliding biographies\" which could happen when a \n% biography's text was shorter than the space for the photo.\n% MDS 7/2001\n% V1.6 prevent multiple biographies from making multiple TOC entries\n\\newif\\if@IEEEbiographyTOCentrynotmade\n\\global\\@IEEEbiographyTOCentrynotmadetrue\n\n% biography counter so hyperref can jump directly to the biographies\n% and not just the previous section\n\\newcounter{IEEEbiography}\n\\setcounter{IEEEbiography}{0}\n\n% photo area size\n\\def\\@IEEEBIOphotowidth{1.0in} % width of the biography photo area\n\\def\\@IEEEBIOphotodepth{1.25in} % depth (height) of the biography photo area\n% area cleared for photo\n\\def\\@IEEEBIOhangwidth{1.14in} % width cleared for the biography photo area\n\\def\\@IEEEBIOhangdepth{1.25in} % depth cleared for the biography photo area\n % actual depth will be a multiple of \n % \\baselineskip, rounded up\n\\def\\@IEEEBIOskipN{4\\baselineskip}% nominal value of the vskip above the biography\n\n\\newenvironment{IEEEbiography}[2][]{\\normalfont\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\sffamily}\\footnotesize%\n\\unitlength 1in\\parskip=0pt\\par\\parindent 1em\\interlinepenalty500%\n% we need enough space to support the hanging indent\n% the nominal value of the spacer\n% and one extra line for good measure\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=\\@IEEEBIOhangdepth%\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by \\@IEEEBIOskipN%\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by 1\\baselineskip%\n% if this page does not have enough space, break it and lets start\n% with a new one\n\\@IEEEtranneedspace{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\relax}%\n% nominal spacer can strech, not shrink use 1fil so user can out stretch with \\vfill\n\\vskip \\@IEEEBIOskipN plus 1fil minus 0\\baselineskip%\n% the default box for where the photo goes\n\\def\\@IEEEtempbiographybox{{\\setlength{\\fboxsep}{0pt}\\framebox{%\n\\begin{minipage}[b][\\@IEEEBIOphotodepth][c]{\\@IEEEBIOphotowidth}\\centering PLACE\\\\ PHOTO\\\\ HERE \\end{minipage}}}}%\n%\n% detect if the optional argument was supplied, this requires the\n% \\@ifmtarg command as defined in the appendix section above\n% and if so, override the default box with what they want\n\\@ifmtarg{#1}{\\relax}{\\def\\@IEEEtempbiographybox{\\mbox{\\begin{minipage}[b][\\@IEEEBIOphotodepth][c]{\\@IEEEBIOphotowidth}%\n\\centering%\n#1%\n\\end{minipage}}}}% end if optional argument supplied\n% Make an entry into the table of contents only if we have not done so before\n\\if@IEEEbiographyTOCentrynotmade%\n% link labels to the biography counter so hyperref will jump\n% to the biography, not the previous section\n\\setcounter{IEEEbiography}{-1}%\n\\refstepcounter{IEEEbiography}%\n\\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Biographies}%\n\\global\\@IEEEbiographyTOCentrynotmadefalse%\n\\fi%\n% one more biography\n\\refstepcounter{IEEEbiography}%\n% Make an entry for this name into the table of contents \n\\addcontentsline{toc}{subsection}{#2}%\n% V1.6 properly handle if a new paragraph should occur while the\n% hanging indent is still active. Do this by redefining \\par so\n% that it will not start a new paragraph. (But it will appear to the\n% user as if it did.) Also, strip any leading pars, newlines, or spaces.\n\\let\\@IEEEBIOORGparCMD=\\par% save the original \\par command\n\\edef\\par{\\hfil\\break\\indent}% the new \\par will not be a \"real\" \\par\n\\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}{\\@IEEEtempbiographybox}% get height of biography box\n\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB=\\@IEEEBIOhangdepth%\n\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA=\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB% countA has the hang depth\n\\divide\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA by \\baselineskip% calculates lines needed to produce the hang depth\n\\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA by 1% ensure we overestimate\n% set the hanging indent\n\\hangindent\\@IEEEBIOhangwidth%\n\\hangafter-\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA%\n% reference the top of the photo area to the top of a capital T\n\\settoheight{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}{\\mbox{T}}%\n% set the photo box, give it zero width and height so as not to disturb anything\n\\noindent\\makebox[0pt][l]{\\hspace{-\\@IEEEBIOhangwidth}\\raisebox{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenB}[0pt][0pt]{%\n\\raisebox{-\\@IEEEBIOphotodepth}[0pt][0pt]{\\@IEEEtempbiographybox}}}%\n% now place the author name and begin the bio text\n\\noindent\\textbf{#2\\ }\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}{\\relax\\let\\par=\\@IEEEBIOORGparCMD\\par%\n% 7/2001 V1.5 detect when the biography text is shorter than the photo area\n% and pad the unused area - preventing a collision from the next biography entry\n% MDS\n\\ifnum \\prevgraf <\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA\\relax% detect when the biography text is shorter than the photo\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA by -\\prevgraf% calculate how many lines we need to pad\n \\advance\\@IEEEtrantmpcountA by -1\\relax% we compensate for the fact that we indented an extra line\n \\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA=\\baselineskip% calculate the length of the padding\n \\multiply\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA by \\@IEEEtrantmpcountA%\n \\noindent\\rule{0pt}{\\@IEEEtrantmpdimenA}% insert an invisible support strut\n\\fi%\n\\par\\normalfont}\n\n\n\n% V1.6\n% added biography without a photo environment\n\\newenvironment{IEEEbiographynophoto}[1]{%\n% Make an entry into the table of contents only if we have not done so before\n\\if@IEEEbiographyTOCentrynotmade%\n% link labels to the biography counter so hyperref will jump\n% to the biography, not the previous section\n\\setcounter{IEEEbiography}{-1}%\n\\refstepcounter{IEEEbiography}%\n\\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Biographies}%\n\\global\\@IEEEbiographyTOCentrynotmadefalse%\n\\fi%\n% one more biography\n\\refstepcounter{IEEEbiography}%\n% Make an entry for this name into the table of contents \n\\addcontentsline{toc}{subsection}{#1}%\n\\normalfont\\@IEEEcompsoconly{\\sffamily}\\footnotesize\\interlinepenalty500%\n\\vskip 4\\baselineskip plus 1fil minus 0\\baselineskip%\n\\parskip=0pt\\par%\n\\noindent\\textbf{#1\\ }\\@IEEEgobbleleadPARNLSP}{\\relax\\par\\normalfont}\n\n\n% provide the user with some old font commands\n% got this from article.cls\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\rm}{\\normalfont\\rmfamily}{\\mathrm}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\sf}{\\normalfont\\sffamily}{\\mathsf}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\tt}{\\normalfont\\ttfamily}{\\mathtt}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\bf}{\\normalfont\\bfseries}{\\mathbf}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\it}{\\normalfont\\itshape}{\\mathit}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\sl}{\\normalfont\\slshape}{\\@nomath\\sl}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\sc}{\\normalfont\\scshape}{\\@nomath\\sc}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand*\\cal{\\@fontswitch\\relax\\mathcal}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand*\\mit{\\@fontswitch\\relax\\mathnormal}\n\n\n% SPECIAL PAPER NOTICE COMMANDS\n% \n% holds the special notice text\n\\def\\@IEEEspecialpapernotice{\\relax}\n \n% for special papers, like invited papers, the user can do:\n% \\IEEEspecialpapernotice{(Invited Paper)} before \\maketitle\n\\def\\IEEEspecialpapernotice#1{\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference%\n\\def\\@IEEEspecialpapernotice{{\\sublargesize\\textit{#1}\\vspace*{1em}}}%\n\\else%\n\\def\\@IEEEspecialpapernotice{{\\\\*[1.5ex]\\sublargesize\\textit{#1}}\\vspace*{-2ex}}%\n\\fi}\n\n\n\n\n% PUBLISHER ID COMMANDS\n% to insert a publisher's ID footer\n% V1.6 \\IEEEpubid has been changed so that the change in page size and style\n% occurs in \\maketitle. \\IEEEpubid must now be issued prior to \\maketitle\n% use \\IEEEpubidadjcol as before - in the second column of the title page\n% These changes allow \\maketitle to take the reduced page height into\n% consideration when dynamically setting the space between the author \n% names and the maintext.\n%\n% the amount the main text is pulled up to make room for the\n% publisher's ID footer\n% The IEEE uses about 1.3\\baselineskip for journals, \n% dynamic title spacing will clean up the fraction\n\\def\\@IEEEpubidpullup{1.3\\baselineskip}\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote\n% for technotes it must be an integer of baselineskip as there can be no\n% dynamic title spacing for two column mode technotes (the title is in the\n% in first column) and we should maintain an integer number of lines in the\n% second column\n% There are some examples (such as older issues of \"Transactions on\n% Information Theory\") in which the IEEE really pulls the text off the ID for\n% technotes - about 0.55in (or 4\\baselineskip). We'll use 2\\baselineskip\n% and call it even.\n\\def\\@IEEEpubidpullup{2\\baselineskip}\n\\fi\n\n% V1.7 compsoc does not use a pullup\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n\\def\\@IEEEpubidpullup{0pt}\n\\fi\n\n% holds the ID text\n\\def\\@IEEEpubid{\\relax}\n\n% flag so \\maketitle can tell if \\IEEEpubid was called\n\\newif\\if@IEEEusingpubid\n\\global\\@IEEEusingpubidfalse\n% issue this command in the page to have the ID at the bottom\n% V1.6 use before \\maketitle\n\\def\\IEEEpubid#1{\\def\\@IEEEpubid{#1}\\global\\@IEEEusingpubidtrue}\n\n\n% command which will pull up (shorten) the column it is executed in\n% to make room for the publisher ID. Place in the second column of\n% the title page when using \\IEEEpubid\n% Is smart enough not to do anything when in single column text or\n% if the user hasn't called \\IEEEpubid\n% currently needed in for the second column of a page with the\n% publisher ID. If not needed in future releases, please provide this\n% command and define it as \\relax for backward compatibility\n% v1.6b do not allow command to operate if the peer review option has been \n% selected because \\IEEEpubidadjcol will not be on the cover page.\n% V1.7 do nothing if compsoc\n\\def\\IEEEpubidadjcol{\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\\else\\ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview\\else\n\\if@twocolumn\\if@IEEEusingpubid\\enlargethispage{-\\@IEEEpubidpullup}\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi}\n\n% Special thanks to Peter Wilson, Daniel Luecking, and the other\n% gurus at comp.text.tex, for helping me to understand how best to\n% implement the IEEEpubid command in LaTeX.\n\n\n\n%% Lockout some commands under various conditions\n\n% general purpose bit bucket\n\\newsavebox{\\@IEEEtranrubishbin}\n\n% flags to prevent multiple warning messages\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNthanks\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEPARstart\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEbiography\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEbiographynophoto\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEpubid\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEpubidadjcol\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEmembership\n\\newif\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEaftertitletext\n\\@IEEEWARNthankstrue\n\\@IEEEWARNIEEEPARstarttrue\n\\@IEEEWARNIEEEbiographytrue\n\\@IEEEWARNIEEEbiographynophototrue\n\\@IEEEWARNIEEEpubidtrue\n\\@IEEEWARNIEEEpubidadjcoltrue\n\\@IEEEWARNIEEEmembershiptrue\n\\@IEEEWARNIEEEaftertitletexttrue\n\n\n%% Lockout some commands when in various modes, but allow them to be restored if needed\n%%\n% save commands which might be locked out\n% so that the user can later restore them if needed\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDthanks\\thanks\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEPARstart\\IEEEPARstart\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEbiography\\IEEEbiography\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDendIEEEbiography\\endIEEEbiography\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEbiographynophoto\\IEEEbiographynophoto\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDendIEEEbiographynophoto\\endIEEEbiographynophoto\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEpubid\\IEEEpubid\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEpubidadjcol\\IEEEpubidadjcol\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEmembership\\IEEEmembership\n\\let\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEaftertitletext\\IEEEaftertitletext\n\n\n% disable \\IEEEPARstart when in draft mode\n% This may have originally been done because the pre-V1.6 drop letter\n% algorithm had problems with a non-unity baselinestretch\n% At any rate, it seems too formal to have a drop letter in a draft\n% paper.\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONdraftcls\n\\def\\IEEEPARstart#1#2{#1#2\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEPARstart\\typeout{** ATTENTION: \\noexpand\\IEEEPARstart\n is disabled in draft mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEPARstartfalse}\n\\fi\n% and for technotes\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONtechnote\n\\def\\IEEEPARstart#1#2{#1#2\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEPARstart\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\IEEEPARstart\n is locked out for technotes (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEPARstartfalse}\n\\fi\n\n\n% lockout unneeded commands when in conference mode\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONconference\n% when locked out, \\thanks, \\IEEEbiography, \\IEEEbiographynophoto, \\IEEEpubid,\n% \\IEEEmembership and \\IEEEaftertitletext will all swallow their given text. \n% \\IEEEPARstart will output a normal character instead\n% warn the user about these commands only once to prevent the console screen\n% from filling up with redundant messages\n\\def\\thanks#1{\\if@IEEEWARNthanks\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\thanks\n is locked out when in conference mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNthanksfalse}\n\\def\\IEEEPARstart#1#2{#1#2\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEPARstart\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\IEEEPARstart\n is locked out when in conference mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEPARstartfalse}\n\n\n% LaTeX treats environments and commands with optional arguments differently.\n% the actual (\"internal\") command is stored as \\\\commandname \n% (accessed via \\csname\\string\\commandname\\endcsname )\n% the \"external\" command \\commandname is a macro with code to determine\n% whether or not the optional argument is presented and to provide the \n% default if it is absent. So, in order to save and restore such a command\n% we would have to save and restore \\\\commandname as well. But, if LaTeX\n% ever changes the way it names the internal names, the trick would break.\n% Instead let us just define a new environment so that the internal\n% name can be left undisturbed.\n\\newenvironment{@IEEEbogusbiography}[2][]{\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEbiography\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\IEEEbiography\n is locked out when in conference mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEbiographyfalse%\n\\setbox\\@IEEEtranrubishbin\\vbox\\bgroup}{\\egroup\\relax}\n% and make biography point to our bogus biography\n\\let\\IEEEbiography=\\@IEEEbogusbiography\n\\let\\endIEEEbiography=\\end@IEEEbogusbiography\n\n\\renewenvironment{IEEEbiographynophoto}[1]{\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEbiographynophoto\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\IEEEbiographynophoto\n is locked out when in conference mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEbiographynophotofalse%\n\\setbox\\@IEEEtranrubishbin\\vbox\\bgroup}{\\egroup\\relax}\n\n\\def\\IEEEpubid#1{\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEpubid\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\IEEEpubid \n is locked out when in conference mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEpubidfalse}\n\\def\\IEEEpubidadjcol{\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEpubidadjcol\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\IEEEpubidadjcol\n is locked out when in conference mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEpubidadjcolfalse}\n\\def\\IEEEmembership#1{\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEmembership\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\IEEEmembership\n is locked out when in conference mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEmembershipfalse}\n\\def\\IEEEaftertitletext#1{\\if@IEEEWARNIEEEaftertitletext\\typeout{** WARNING: \\noexpand\\IEEEaftertitletext\n is locked out when in conference mode (line \\the\\inputlineno).}\\fi\\global\\@IEEEWARNIEEEaftertitletextfalse}\n\\fi\n\n\n% provide a way to restore the commands that are locked out\n\\def\\IEEEoverridecommandlockouts{%\n\\typeout{** ATTENTION: Overriding command lockouts (line \\the\\inputlineno).}%\n\\let\\thanks\\@IEEESAVECMDthanks%\n\\let\\IEEEPARstart\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEPARstart%\n\\let\\IEEEbiography\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEbiography%\n\\let\\endIEEEbiography\\@IEEESAVECMDendIEEEbiography%\n\\let\\IEEEbiographynophoto\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEbiographynophoto%\n\\let\\endIEEEbiographynophoto\\@IEEESAVECMDendIEEEbiographynophoto%\n\\let\\IEEEpubid\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEpubid%\n\\let\\IEEEpubidadjcol\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEpubidadjcol%\n\\let\\IEEEmembership\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEmembership%\n\\let\\IEEEaftertitletext\\@IEEESAVECMDIEEEaftertitletext}\n\n\n\n% need a backslash character for typeout output\n{\\catcode`\\|=0 \\catcode`\\\\=12\n|xdef|@IEEEbackslash{\\}}\n\n\n% hook to allow easy disabling of all legacy warnings\n\\def\\@IEEElegacywarn#1#2{\\typeout{** ATTENTION: \\@IEEEbackslash #1 is deprecated (line \\the\\inputlineno).\nUse \\@IEEEbackslash #2 instead.}}\n\n\n% provide some legacy IEEEtran commands\n\\def\\IEEEcompsoctitleabstractindextext{\\@IEEElegacywarn{IEEEcompsoctitleabstractindextext}{IEEEtitleabstractindextext}\\IEEEtitleabstractindextext}\n\\def\\IEEEdisplaynotcompsoctitleabstractindextext{\\@IEEElegacywarn{IEEEdisplaynotcompsoctitleabstractindextext}{IEEEdisplaynontitleabstractindextext}\\IEEEdisplaynontitleabstractindextext}\n% provide some legacy IEEEtran environments\n\n\n% V1.8a no more support for these legacy commands\n%\\def\\authorblockA{\\@IEEElegacywarn{authorblockA}{IEEEauthorblockA}\\IEEEauthorblockA}\n%\\def\\authorblockN{\\@IEEElegacywarn{authorblockN}{IEEEauthorblockN}\\IEEEauthorblockN}\n%\\def\\authorrefmark{\\@IEEElegacywarn{authorrefmark}{IEEEauthorrefmark}\\IEEEauthorrefmark}\n%\\def\\PARstart{\\@IEEElegacywarn{PARstart}{IEEEPARstart}\\IEEEPARstart}\n%\\def\\pubid{\\@IEEElegacywarn{pubid}{IEEEpubid}\\IEEEpubid}\n%\\def\\pubidadjcol{\\@IEEElegacywarn{pubidadjcol}{IEEEpubidadjcol}\\IEEEpubidadjcol}\n%\\def\\specialpapernotice{\\@IEEElegacywarn{specialpapernotice}{IEEEspecialpapernotice}\\IEEEspecialpapernotice}\n% and environments\n%\\def\\keywords{\\@IEEElegacywarn{keywords}{IEEEkeywords}\\IEEEkeywords}\n%\\def\\endkeywords{\\endIEEEkeywords}\n% V1.8 no more support for legacy IED list commands\n%\\let\\labelindent\\IEEElabelindent\n%\\def\\calcleftmargin{\\@IEEElegacywarn{calcleftmargin}{IEEEcalcleftmargin}\\IEEEcalcleftmargin}\n%\\def\\setlabelwidth{\\@IEEElegacywarn{setlabelwidth}{IEEEsetlabelwidth}\\IEEEsetlabelwidth}\n%\\def\\usemathlabelsep{\\@IEEElegacywarn{usemathlabelsep}{IEEEusemathlabelsep}\\IEEEusemathlabelsep}\n%\\def\\iedlabeljustifyc{\\@IEEElegacywarn{iedlabeljustifyc}{IEEEiedlabeljustifyc}\\IEEEiedlabeljustifyc}\n%\\def\\iedlabeljustifyl{\\@IEEElegacywarn{iedlabeljustifyl}{IEEEiedlabeljustifyl}\\IEEEiedlabeljustifyl}\n%\\def\\iedlabeljustifyr{\\@IEEElegacywarn{iedlabeljustifyr}{IEEEiedlabeljustifyr}\\IEEEiedlabeljustifyr}\n% V1.8 no more support for QED and proof stuff\n%\\def\\QED{\\@IEEElegacywarn{QED}{IEEEQED}\\IEEEQED}\n%\\def\\QEDclosed{\\@IEEElegacywarn{QEDclosed}{IEEEQEDclosed}\\IEEEQEDclosed}\n%\\def\\QEDopen{\\@IEEElegacywarn{QEDopen}{IEEEQEDopen}\\IEEEQEDopen}\n%\\AtBeginDocument{\\def\\proof{\\@IEEElegacywarn{proof}{IEEEproof}\\IEEEproof}\\def\\endproof{\\endIEEEproof}}\n% V1.8 no longer support biography or biographynophoto\n%\\def\\biography{\\@IEEElegacywarn{biography}{IEEEbiography}\\IEEEbiography}\n%\\def\\biographynophoto{\\@IEEElegacywarn{biographynophoto}{IEEEbiographynophoto}\\IEEEbiographynophoto}\n%\\def\\endbiography{\\endIEEEbiography}\n%\\def\\endbiographynophoto{\\endIEEEbiographynophoto}\n% V1.7 and later no longer supports \\overrideIEEEmargins\n%\\def\\overrideIEEEmargins{%\n%\\typeout{** WARNING: \\string\\overrideIEEEmargins \\space no longer supported (line \\the\\inputlineno).}%\n%\\typeout{** Use the \\string\\CLASSINPUTinnersidemargin, \\string\\CLASSINPUToutersidemargin \\space controls instead.}}\n\n\\endinput\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% End of IEEEtran.cls %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% That's all folks!\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: TPAMI26_ERA.tex\n================================================\n\\ifdefined\\pdfminorversion\n \\pdfminorversion=7\n\\fi\n\\ifdefined\\pdfobjcompresslevel\n \\pdfobjcompresslevel=0\n\\fi\n\n\\documentclass[10pt,journal,compsoc]{IEEEtran}\n\n% DO NOT USE \\usepackage{times}; IEEE typesetters will remove it.\n\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}\n\\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{multirow}\n\\usepackage{makecell}\n\\usepackage{array}\n\\usepackage{float}\n\\usepackage{pifont}\n\\usepackage{ragged2e}\n\\usepackage{url}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{colortbl}\n\\usepackage{algorithm}\n\\usepackage{algorithmic}\n\n\\ifCLASSOPTIONcompsoc\n \\usepackage[nocompress]{cite}\n\\else\n \\usepackage{cite}\n\\fi\n\n\\usepackage[colorlinks=true,linkcolor=blue,citecolor=blue,urlcolor=blue]{hyperref}\n\n\\definecolor{headergray}{RGB}{245,245,245}\n\\definecolor{rowblue}{RGB}{255,244,235}\n\\definecolor{colavg}{RGB}{248,248,250}\n\\definecolor{rowgreen}{RGB}{240,248,243}\n\\definecolor{textpurple}{RGB}{255,0,0}\n\n\\newcommand{\\erahighlight}[1]{#1}\n\\newcommand{\\pub}[1]{$_{\\text{#1}}$}\n\\newcommand{\\cmark}{\\ding{51}}\n\\newcommand{\\xmark}{\\ding{55}}\n\n\\hyphenation{op-tical net-works semi-conduc-tor}\n\\graphicspath{{images/}}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\\title{ERA: Entropy-Guided Visual Token Pruning with Rectified Attention for Efficient MLLMs}\n\n \\author{Yuhao~Wang,\n Mu~Qiao,\n Haiwen~Diao$^{\\dagger,\\,\\ast}$,\n Yunzhi~Zhuge$^{\\dagger}$,\n Pingping~Zhang$^{\\dagger}$, ~\\IEEEmembership{Member,~IEEE},\\\\\n Xindong~Zhang,\n Lei~Zhang,~\\IEEEmembership{Fellow,~IEEE} and\n Huchuan~Lu,~\\IEEEmembership{Fellow,~IEEE}\n\\IEEEcompsocitemizethanks{\n\\IEEEcompsocthanksitem $\\dagger$ denotes the corresponding author. $\\ast$ denotes the project lead.\n\\IEEEcompsocthanksitem Yuhao Wang, Mu Qiao, Yunzhi Zhuge, Pingping Zhang, and Huchuan Lu are with the School of Future Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China (e-mail: 924973292@mail.dlut.edu.cn; q15841685383@mail.dlut.edu.cn; zgyz@dlut.edu.cn; zhpp@dlut.edu.cn; lhchuan@dlut.edu.cn).\n\\IEEEcompsocthanksitem Haiwen Diao is with S-Lab, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798 (e-mail: haiwen.diao@ntu.edu.sg).\n\\IEEEcompsocthanksitem Xindong Zhang is with the OPPO Research Institute, Shenzhen 518000, China (e-mail: zhangxindong1@oppo.com).\n\\IEEEcompsocthanksitem Lei Zhang is with the Department of Computing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong (e-mail: cslzhang@comp.polyu.edu.hk).\n}}\n\n\\markboth{IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence}%\n{Wang \\MakeLowercase{\\textit{et al.}}: ERA: Entropy-Guided Visual Token Pruning with Rectified Attention for Efficient MLLMs}\n\n\\input{sections/abstract}\n\\maketitle\n\\IEEEdisplaynontitleabstractindextext\n\\IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle\n\n\\input{sections/introduction.tex}\n\\input{sections/relatedwork.tex}\n\\input{sections/method.tex}\n\\input{sections/experiment.tex}\n\\input{sections/conclusion.tex}\n\\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}\n\\bibliography{refs}\n\\input{sections/biography}\n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: algorithm.sty\n================================================\n% ALGORITHM STYLE -- Released 8 April 1996\n% for LaTeX-2e\n% Copyright -- 1994 Peter Williams\n% E-mail Peter.Williams@dsto.defence.gov.au\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesPackage{algorithm}\n\\typeout{Document Style `algorithm' - floating environment}\n\n\\RequirePackage{float}\n\\RequirePackage{ifthen}\n\\newcommand{\\ALG@within}{nothing}\n\\newboolean{ALG@within}\n\\setboolean{ALG@within}{false}\n\\newcommand{\\ALG@floatstyle}{ruled}\n\\newcommand{\\ALG@name}{Algorithm}\n\\newcommand{\\listalgorithmname}{List of \\ALG@name s}\n\n% Declare Options\n% first appearance\n\\DeclareOption{plain}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@floatstyle}{plain}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{ruled}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@floatstyle}{ruled}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{boxed}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@floatstyle}{boxed}\n}\n% then numbering convention\n\\DeclareOption{part}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@within}{part}\n \\setboolean{ALG@within}{true}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{chapter}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@within}{chapter}\n \\setboolean{ALG@within}{true}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{section}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@within}{section}\n \\setboolean{ALG@within}{true}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{subsection}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@within}{subsection}\n \\setboolean{ALG@within}{true}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{subsubsection}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@within}{subsubsection}\n \\setboolean{ALG@within}{true}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{nothing}{\n \\renewcommand{\\ALG@within}{nothing}\n \\setboolean{ALG@within}{true}\n}\n\\DeclareOption*{\\edef\\ALG@name{\\CurrentOption}}\n\n% ALGORITHM\n%\n\\ProcessOptions\n\\floatstyle{\\ALG@floatstyle}\n\\ifthenelse{\\boolean{ALG@within}}{\n \\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\ALG@within}{part}}\n {\\newfloat{algorithm}{htbp}{loa}[part]}{}\n \\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\ALG@within}{chapter}}\n {\\newfloat{algorithm}{htbp}{loa}[chapter]}{}\n \\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\ALG@within}{section}}\n {\\newfloat{algorithm}{htbp}{loa}[section]}{}\n \\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\ALG@within}{subsection}}\n {\\newfloat{algorithm}{htbp}{loa}[subsection]}{}\n \\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\ALG@within}{subsubsection}}\n {\\newfloat{algorithm}{htbp}{loa}[subsubsection]}{}\n \\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\ALG@within}{nothing}}\n {\\newfloat{algorithm}{htbp}{loa}}{}\n}{\n \\newfloat{algorithm}{htbp}{loa}\n}\n\\floatname{algorithm}{\\ALG@name}\n\n\\newcommand{\\listofalgorithms}{\\listof{algorithm}{\\listalgorithmname}}\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: algorithmic.sty\n================================================\n% ALGORITHMIC STYLE -- Released 8 APRIL 1996\n% for LaTeX version 2e\n% Copyright -- 1994 Peter Williams\n% E-mail PeterWilliams@dsto.defence.gov.au\n%\n% Modified by Alex Smola (08/2000)\n% E-mail Alex.Smola@anu.edu.au\n%\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesPackage{algorithmic}\n\\typeout{Document Style `algorithmic' - environment}\n%\n\\RequirePackage{ifthen}\n\\RequirePackage{calc}\n\\newboolean{ALC@noend}\n\\setboolean{ALC@noend}{false}\n\\newcounter{ALC@line}\n\\newcounter{ALC@rem}\n\\newlength{\\ALC@tlm}\n%\n\\DeclareOption{noend}{\\setboolean{ALC@noend}{true}}\n%\n\\ProcessOptions\n%\n% ALGORITHMIC\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicrequire}{\\textbf{Require:}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicensure}{\\textbf{Ensure:}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmiccomment}[1]{\\{#1\\}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicend}{\\textbf{end}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicif}{\\textbf{if}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicthen}{\\textbf{then}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicelse}{\\textbf{else}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicelsif}{\\algorithmicelse\\ \\algorithmicif}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicendif}{\\algorithmicend\\ \\algorithmicif}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicfor}{\\textbf{for}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicforall}{\\textbf{for all}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicdo}{\\textbf{do}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicendfor}{\\algorithmicend\\ \\algorithmicfor}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicwhile}{\\textbf{while}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicendwhile}{\\algorithmicend\\ \\algorithmicwhile}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicloop}{\\textbf{loop}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicendloop}{\\algorithmicend\\ \\algorithmicloop}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicrepeat}{\\textbf{repeat}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicuntil}{\\textbf{until}}\n\n%changed by alex smola\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicinput}{\\textbf{input}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicoutput}{\\textbf{output}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicset}{\\textbf{set}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmictrue}{\\textbf{true}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicfalse}{\\textbf{false}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicand}{\\textbf{and\\ }}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicor}{\\textbf{or\\ }}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicfunction}{\\textbf{function}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicendfunction}{\\algorithmicend\\ \\algorithmicfunction}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicmain}{\\textbf{main}}\n\\newcommand{\\algorithmicendmain}{\\algorithmicend\\ \\algorithmicmain}\n%end changed by alex smola\n\n\\def\\ALC@item[#1]{%\n\\if@noparitem \\@donoparitem\n \\else \\if@inlabel \\indent \\par \\fi\n \\ifhmode \\unskip\\unskip \\par \\fi\n \\if@newlist \\if@nobreak \\@nbitem \\else\n \\addpenalty\\@beginparpenalty\n \\addvspace\\@topsep \\addvspace{-\\parskip}\\fi\n \\else \\addpenalty\\@itempenalty \\addvspace\\itemsep\n \\fi\n \\global\\@inlabeltrue\n\\fi\n\\everypar{\\global\\@minipagefalse\\global\\@newlistfalse\n \\if@inlabel\\global\\@inlabelfalse \\hskip -\\parindent \\box\\@labels\n \\penalty\\z@ \\fi\n \\everypar{}}\\global\\@nobreakfalse\n\\if@noitemarg \\@noitemargfalse \\if@nmbrlist \\refstepcounter{\\@listctr}\\fi \\fi\n\\sbox\\@tempboxa{\\makelabel{#1}}%\n\\global\\setbox\\@labels\n \\hbox{\\unhbox\\@labels \\hskip \\itemindent\n \\hskip -\\labelwidth \\hskip -\\ALC@tlm\n \\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\labelwidth\n \\box\\@tempboxa\n \\else \\hbox to\\labelwidth {\\unhbox\\@tempboxa}\\fi\n \\hskip \\ALC@tlm}\\ignorespaces}\n%\n\\newenvironment{algorithmic}[1][0]{\n\\let\\@item\\ALC@item\n \\newcommand{\\ALC@lno}{%\n\\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\arabic{ALC@rem}}{0}}\n{{\\footnotesize \\arabic{ALC@line}:}}{}%\n}\n\\let\\@listii\\@listi\n\\let\\@listiii\\@listi\n\\let\\@listiv\\@listi\n\\let\\@listv\\@listi\n\\let\\@listvi\\@listi\n\\let\\@listvii\\@listi\n \\newenvironment{ALC@g}{\n \\begin{list}{\\ALC@lno}{ \\itemsep\\z@ \\itemindent\\z@\n \\listparindent\\z@ \\rightmargin\\z@ \n \\topsep\\z@ \\partopsep\\z@ \\parskip\\z@\\parsep\\z@\n \\leftmargin 1em\n \\addtolength{\\ALC@tlm}{\\leftmargin}\n }\n }\n {\\end{list}}\n \\newcommand{\\ALC@it}{\\addtocounter{ALC@line}{1}\\addtocounter{ALC@rem}{1}\\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\arabic{ALC@rem}}{#1}}{\\setcounter{ALC@rem}{0}}{}\\item}\n \\newcommand{\\ALC@com}[1]{\\ifthenelse{\\equal{##1}{default}}%\n{}{\\ \\algorithmiccomment{##1}}}\n \\newcommand{\\REQUIRE}{\\item[\\algorithmicrequire]}\n \\newcommand{\\ENSURE}{\\item[\\algorithmicensure]}\n \\newcommand{\\STATE}{\\ALC@it}\n \\newcommand{\\COMMENT}[1]{\\algorithmiccomment{##1}}\n%changes by alex smola\n \\newcommand{\\INPUT}{\\item[\\algorithmicinput]}\n \\newcommand{\\OUTPUT}{\\item[\\algorithmicoutput]}\n \\newcommand{\\SET}{\\item[\\algorithmicset]}\n% \\newcommand{\\TRUE}{\\algorithmictrue}\n% \\newcommand{\\FALSE}{\\algorithmicfalse}\n \\newcommand{\\AND}{\\algorithmicand}\n \\newcommand{\\OR}{\\algorithmicor}\n \\newenvironment{ALC@func}{\\begin{ALC@g}}{\\end{ALC@g}}\n \\newenvironment{ALC@main}{\\begin{ALC@g}}{\\end{ALC@g}}\n%end changes by alex smola\n \\newenvironment{ALC@if}{\\begin{ALC@g}}{\\end{ALC@g}}\n \\newenvironment{ALC@for}{\\begin{ALC@g}}{\\end{ALC@g}}\n \\newenvironment{ALC@whl}{\\begin{ALC@g}}{\\end{ALC@g}}\n \\newenvironment{ALC@loop}{\\begin{ALC@g}}{\\end{ALC@g}}\n \\newenvironment{ALC@rpt}{\\begin{ALC@g}}{\\end{ALC@g}}\n \\renewcommand{\\\\}{\\@centercr}\n \\newcommand{\\IF}[2][default]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicif\\ ##2\\ \\algorithmicthen%\n\\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@if}}\n \\newcommand{\\SHORTIF}[2]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicif\\ ##1\\\n \\algorithmicthen\\ {##2}}\n \\newcommand{\\ELSE}[1][default]{\\end{ALC@if}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicelse%\n\\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@if}}\n \\newcommand{\\ELSIF}[2][default]%\n{\\end{ALC@if}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicelsif\\ ##2\\ \\algorithmicthen%\n\\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@if}}\n \\newcommand{\\FOR}[2][default]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicfor\\ ##2\\ \\algorithmicdo%\n\\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@for}}\n \\newcommand{\\FORALL}[2][default]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicforall\\ ##2\\ %\n\\algorithmicdo%\n\\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@for}}\n \\newcommand{\\SHORTFORALL}[2]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicforall\\ ##1\\ %\n \\algorithmicdo\\ {##2}}\n \\newcommand{\\WHILE}[2][default]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicwhile\\ ##2\\ %\n\\algorithmicdo%\n\\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@whl}}\n \\newcommand{\\LOOP}[1][default]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicloop%\n\\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@loop}}\n%changed by alex smola\n \\newcommand{\\FUNCTION}[2][default]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicfunction\\ ##2\\ %\n \\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@func}}\n \\newcommand{\\MAIN}[2][default]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicmain\\ ##2\\ %\n \\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@main}}\n%end changed by alex smola\n \\newcommand{\\REPEAT}[1][default]{\\ALC@it\\algorithmicrepeat%\n \\ALC@com{##1}\\begin{ALC@rpt}}\n \\newcommand{\\UNTIL}[1]{\\end{ALC@rpt}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicuntil\\ ##1}\n \\ifthenelse{\\boolean{ALC@noend}}{\n \\newcommand{\\ENDIF}{\\end{ALC@if}}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDFOR}{\\end{ALC@for}}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDWHILE}{\\end{ALC@whl}}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDLOOP}{\\end{ALC@loop}}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDFUNCTION}{\\end{ALC@func}}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDMAIN}{\\end{ALC@main}}\n }{\n \\newcommand{\\ENDIF}{\\end{ALC@if}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicendif}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDFOR}{\\end{ALC@for}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicendfor}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDWHILE}{\\end{ALC@whl}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicendwhile}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDLOOP}{\\end{ALC@loop}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicendloop}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDFUNCTION}{\\end{ALC@func}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicendfunction}\n \\newcommand{\\ENDMAIN}{\\end{ALC@main}\\ALC@it\\algorithmicendmain}\n } \n \\renewcommand{\\@toodeep}{}\n \\begin{list}{\\ALC@lno}{\\setcounter{ALC@line}{0}\\setcounter{ALC@rem}{0}%\n \\itemsep\\z@ \\itemindent\\z@ \\listparindent\\z@%\n \\partopsep\\z@ \\parskip\\z@ \\parsep\\z@%\n \\labelsep 0.5em \\topsep 0.2em%\n \\ifthenelse{\\equal{#1}{0}}\n {\\labelwidth 0.5em }\n {\\labelwidth 1.2em }\n \\leftmargin\\labelwidth \\addtolength{\\leftmargin}{\\labelsep}\n \\ALC@tlm\\labelsep\n }\n }\n {\\end{list}}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: images_tex/hyper.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\vspace{-2mm}\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{./images/hyper.pdf}\n \\caption{Hyperparameter sensitivity of ERA with respect to $\\alpha$ and $\\eta$.}\n %\n \\label{fig:hyperparameters}\n\\end{figure}\n\n================================================\nFILE: images_tex/motivation.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{./images/Motivation.pdf}\n \\vspace{-7mm}\n\\caption{Motivations for ERA with LLaVA-1.5-7B on the VQA$^{\\text{T}}$ dataset.\n\\textbf{(a) Token entropy reveals head-wise saliency.} Averaged attention can obscure tokens that are critical to specific heads. Head-wise entropy exposes these low-entropy, head-specific responses concentrated on salient regions, providing an auxiliary criterion for importance estimation.\n\\textbf{(b) Attention logit collapse under token reduction.} Across the four settings, pruning and merging reduce the fraction of attention logit assigned to visual tokens and shift attention toward system and instruction tokens. Our proposed rectified attention realigns this distribution with the full-sequence baseline, preserving visual evidence after compression.}\n \\label{fig:motivation}\n \\vspace{-3mm}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: images_tex/overall.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{./images/Overall.pdf}\n \\vspace{-2mm}\n \\caption{\n Overview of the proposed ERA framework. \n ERA consists of three synergistic components.\n (a) \\textbf{Dual-view Entropy Pruning (DEP)} selects anchors by jointly modeling visual diversity and head-wise saliency. \n (b) \\textbf{Bias-aware Token Recycling (BTR)} merges pruned tokens into their nearest anchors and estimates a cluster-level logit bias. \n (c) \\textbf{Logit-preserving Attention Rectification (LAR)} injects the estimated bias to rectify the \\textit{Attention Logit Collapse}. \n (d) \\textbf{Hardware-aware Implementation} leverages matrix augmentation to maintain compatibility with optimized attention kernels. \n With these components, ERA enables aggressive token reduction while preserving robust and efficient MLLM inference.\n }\n\\label{fig:overall}\n\\vspace{-2mm}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: images_tex/vis1.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{./images/vis1.pdf}\n \\caption{Visualization of token pruning under different DEP criteria.}\n %\n \\label{fig:vis_token_pruning}\n \\vspace{-1mm}\n\\end{figure}\n\n================================================\nFILE: refs.bib\n================================================\n@inproceedings{tong2025flowcut,\ntitle={{FlowCut}: Rethinking Redundancy via Information Flow for Efficient Vision-Language Models},\nauthor={Jintao Tong and Wenwei Jin and Pengda Qin and Anqi Li and Yixiong Zou and Yuhong Li and Yuhua Li and Ruixuan Li},\nbooktitle={NeurIPS},\nvolume={38},\npages={94946--94973},\nyear={2025}\n}\n@article{jensen1906fonctions,\n title={Sur les fonctions convexes et les in{\\'e}galit{\\'e}s entre les valeurs moyennes},\n author={Jensen, Johan Ludwig William Valdemar},\n journal={Acta mathematica},\n volume={30},\n number={1},\n pages={175--193},\n year={1906},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n@inproceedings{kwon2023efficient,\n title={Efficient memory management for large language model serving with pagedattention},\n author={Kwon, Woosuk and Li, Zhuohan and Zhuang, Siyuan and Sheng, Ying and Zheng, Lianmin and Yu, Cody Hao and Gonzalez, Joseph and Zhang, Hao and Stoica, Ion},\n booktitle={SOSP},\n pages={611--626},\n year={2023}\n}\n@article{baek2026agilepruner,\n title={AgilePruner: An empirical study of attention and diversity for adaptive visual token pruning in large vision-language models},\n author={Baek, Changwoo and Song, Jouwon and Kim, Sohyeon and Kong, Kyeongbo},\n journal={ICLR},\n year={2026}\n}\n@inproceedings{kim2026zooprune,\n title={ZOO-Prune: Training-Free Token Pruning via Zeroth-Order Gradient Estimation in Vision-Language Models},\n author={Kim, Youngeun and Zhang, Youjia and Liu, Huiling and Jung, Aecheon and Lee, Sunwoo and Hong, Sungeun},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n year={2026}\n}\n@inproceedings{zhu2026hawk,\n title={HAWK: Head Importance-Aware Visual Token Pruning in Multimodal Models},\n author={Zhu, Qihui and Zhang, Tao and Wang, Yuchen and Chen, Shuangwu and Tan, Xiaobin and Yang, Jian and Liu, Yang and Pan, Yinfei},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n pages={39583--39592},\n year={2026}\n}\n@inproceedings{chen2026one,\n title={One Layer's Trash is Another Layer's Treasure: Adaptive Layer-wise Visual Token Selection in LVLMs},\n author={Chen, Yongru and Zhang, Kai and Zong, Zeliang and Lu, Yuchen and Tan, Wenming and Ren, Ye and Hu, Jilin},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n pages={17672--17681},\n year={2026}\n}\n@inproceedings{liu2023visual,\n title={Visual Instruction Tuning},\n author={Liu, Haotian and Li, Chunyuan and Wu, Qingyang and Lee, Yong Jae},\n booktitle={NeurIPS},\n volume={36},\n pages={34892--34916},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{liu2024improved,\n title={Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning},\n author={Liu, Haotian and Li, Chunyuan and Li, Yuheng and Lee, Yong Jae},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n pages={26296--26306},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{baltrusaitis2019multimodal,\n title={Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomy},\n author={Baltrusaitis, Tadas and Ahuja, Chaitanya and Morency, Louis-Philippe},\n journal={TPAMI},\n volume={41},\n number={2},\n pages={423--443},\n year={2019},\n doi={10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2798607}\n}\n\n@article{han2023survey,\n title={A Survey on Vision Transformer},\n author={Han, Kai and Wang, Yunhe and Chen, Hanting and Chen, Xinghao and Guo, Jianyuan and Liu, Zhenhua and Tang, Yehui and Xiao, An and Xu, Chunjing and Xu, Yixing and Yang, Zhaohui and Zhang, Yiman and Tao, Dacheng},\n journal={TPAMI},\n volume={45},\n number={1},\n pages={87--110},\n year={2023},\n doi={10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3152247}\n}\n\n@article{xu2023multimodal,\n title={Multimodal Learning With Transformers: A Survey},\n author={Xu, Peng and Zhu, Xiatian and Clifton, David A.},\n journal={TPAMI},\n volume={45},\n number={10},\n pages={12113--12132},\n year={2023},\n doi={10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3275156}\n}\n\n@article{zhang2024visionlanguage,\n title={Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Survey},\n author={Zhang, Jingyi and Huang, Jiaxing and Jin, Sheng and Lu, Shijian},\n journal={TPAMI},\n volume={46},\n number={8},\n pages={5625--5644},\n year={2024},\n doi={10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3369699}\n}\n\n@article{papa2024efficient,\n title={A Survey on Efficient Vision Transformers: Algorithms, Techniques, and Performance Benchmarking},\n author={Papa, Lorenzo and Russo, Paolo and Amerini, Irene and Zhou, Luping},\n journal={TPAMI},\n volume={46},\n number={12},\n pages={7682--7700},\n year={2024},\n doi={10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3392941}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2019root,\n title={Root Mean Square Layer Normalization},\n author={Zhang, Biao and Sennrich, Rico},\n booktitle={NeurIPS},\n volume={32},\n pages={12360--12371},\n year={2019}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{dosovitskiy2021image,\n title={An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale},\n author={Dosovitskiy, Alexey and Beyer, Lucas and Kolesnikov, Alexander and Weissenborn, Dirk and Zhai, Xiaohua and Unterthiner, Thomas and Dehghani, Mostafa and Minderer, Matthias and Heigold, Georg and Gelly, Sylvain and Uszkoreit, Jakob and Houlsby, Neil},\n booktitle={ICLR},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@article{shazeer2020glu,\n title={{GLU} Variants Improve Transformer},\n author={Shazeer, Noam},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.05202},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{liu2021swin,\n title={{Swin Transformer}: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows},\n author={Liu, Ze and Lin, Yutong and Cao, Yue and Hu, Han and Wei, Yixuan and Zhang, Zheng and Lin, Stephen and Guo, Baining},\n booktitle={ICCV},\n pages={10012--10022},\n year={2021}\n}\n@misc{liu2024llavanext,\n title={{LLaVA-NeXT}: Improved Reasoning, {OCR}, and World Knowledge},\n author={Liu, Haotian and Li, Chunyuan and Li, Yuheng and Li, Bo and Zhang, Yuanhan and Shen, Sheng and Lee, Yong Jae},\n howpublished={LLaVA Blog},\n year={2024},\n note={Accessed: May 17, 2026}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhu2024minigpt,\ntitle={Mini{GPT}-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Models},\nauthor={Deyao Zhu and Jun Chen and Xiaoqian Shen and Xiang Li and Mohamed Elhoseiny},\nbooktitle={ICLR},\nyear={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{chen2024internvl,\n title={{InternVL}: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Tasks},\n author={Chen, Zhe and Wu, Jiannan and Wang, Wenhai and Su, Weijie and Chen, Guo and Xing, Sen and Zhong, Muyan and Zhang, Qinglong and Zhu, Xizhou and Lu, Lewei and Li, Bin and Luo, Ping and Lu, Tong and Qiao, Yu and Dai, Jifeng},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n pages={24185--24198},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{zhu2025internvl3,\n title={{InternVL3}: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models},\n author={Zhu, Jinguo and Wang, Weiyun and Chen, Zhe and Liu, Zhaoyang and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10479},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{dong2024internlm,\n title={{InternLM-XComposer2}: Mastering Free-form Text-Image Composition and Comprehension in Vision-Language Large Models},\n author={Dong, Xiaoyi and Zhang, Pan and Zang, Yuhang and Cao, Yuhang and Wang, Bin and Ouyang, Linke and Wei, Xilin and Zhang, Songyang and Duan, Haodong and Cao, Maosong and Zhang, Wenwei and Li, Yining and Yan, Hang and Gao, Yang and Zhang, Xinyue and Li, Wei and Li, Jingwen and Chen, Kai and He, Conghui and Zhang, Xingcheng and Qiao, Yu and Lin, Dahua and Wang, Jiaqi},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.16420},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{diao2025evev2,\n author = {Diao, Haiwen and Li, Xiaotong and Cui, Yufeng and Wang, Yueze and Deng, Haoge and Pan, Ting and Wang, Wenxuan and Lu, Huchuan and Wang, Xinlong},\n title = {{EVEv2}: Improved Baselines for Encoder-Free Vision-Language Models},\n booktitle = {ICCV},\n year = {2025},\n pages = {21014--21025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{diao2024unveiling,\n title={Unveiling encoder-free vision-language models},\n author={Diao, Haiwen and Cui, Yufeng and Li, Xiaotong and Wang, Yueze and Lu, Huchuan and Wang, Xinlong},\n booktitle={NeurIPS},\n volume={37},\n pages={52545--52567},\n year={2024},\n doi={10.52202/079017-1665}\n}\n\n@article{yin2024survey,\n title={A survey on multimodal large language models},\n author={Yin, Shukang and Fu, Chaoyou and Zhao, Sirui and Li, Ke and Sun, Xing and Xu, Tong and Chen, Enhong},\n journal={National Science Review},\n volume={11},\n number={12},\n pages={nwae403},\n year={2024},\n doi={10.1093/nsr/nwae403}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{fu2025mme,\n title={{MME}: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models},\n author={Fu, Chaoyou and Chen, Peixian and Shen, Yunhang and Qin, Yulei and Zhang, Mengdan and Lin, Xu and Yang, Jinrui and Zheng, Xiawu and Li, Ke and Sun, Xing and Wu, Yunsheng and Ji, Rongrong and Shan, Caifeng and He, Ran},\n booktitle={NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks Track},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{chen2024longvila,\n title={Long{VILA}: Scaling Long-Context Visual Language Models for Long Videos},\n author={Yukang Chen and Fuzhao Xue and Dacheng Li and Qinghao Hu and Ligeng Zhu and Xiuyu Li and Yunhao Fang and Haotian Tang and Shang Yang and Zhijian Liu and Yihui He and Hongxu Yin and Pavlo Molchanov and Jan Kautz and Linxi Fan and Yuke Zhu and Yao Lu and Song Han},\n booktitle={ICLR},\n year={2025}\n}\n@inproceedings{chen2024image,\n title={An image is worth 1/2 tokens after layer 2: Plug-and-play inference acceleration for large vision-language models},\n author={Chen, Liang and Zhao, Haozhe and Liu, Tianyu and Bai, Shuai and Lin, Junyang and Zhou, Chang and Chang, Baobao},\n booktitle={ECCV},\n pages={19--35},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{li2023blip,\n title={{BLIP-2}: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-Training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models},\n author={Li, Junnan and Li, Dongxu and Savarese, Silvio and Hoi, Steven},\n booktitle={ICML},\n pages={19730--19742},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{shao2025tokens,\n title={A Survey of Token Compression for Efficient Multimodal Large Language Models},\n author={Shao, Kele and Tao, Keda and Zhang, Kejia and Feng, Sicheng and Cai, Mu and Shang, Yuzhang and You, Haoxuan and Qin, Can and Sui, Yang and Wang, Huan},\n journal={TMLR},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{bai2025qwen2,\n title={{Qwen2.5-VL} {Technical Report}},\n author={Bai, Shuai and Chen, Keqin and Liu, Xuejing and Wang, Jialin and Ge, Wenbin and Song, Sibo and Dang, Kai and Wang, Peng and Wang, Shijie and Tang, Jun and Zhong, Humen and Zhu, Yuanzhi and Yang, Mingkun and Li, Zhaohai and Wan, Jianqiang and Wang, Pengfei and Ding, Wei and Fu, Zheren and Xu, Yiheng and Ye, Jiabo and Zhang, Xi and Xie, Tianbao and Cheng, Zesen and Zhang, Hang and Yang, Zhibo and Xu, Haiyang and Lin, Junyang},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13923},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{shang2025llava,\n title={{LLaVA-PruMerge}: Adaptive Token Reduction for Efficient Large Multimodal Models},\n author={Shang, Yuzhang and Cai, Mu and Xu, Bingxin and Lee, Yong Jae and Yan, Yan},\n booktitle={ICCV},\n pages={22857--22867},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{dao2022flashattention,\n title={{FlashAttention}: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with {IO}-Awareness},\n author={Dao, Tri and Fu, Daniel Y. and Ermon, Stefano and Rudra, Atri and R{\\'e}, Christopher},\n booktitle={NeurIPS},\n volume={35},\n pages={16344--16359},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{chen2018fast,\n title={Fast Greedy {MAP} Inference for Determinantal Point Process to Improve Recommendation Diversity},\n author={Chen, Laming and Zhang, Guoxin and Zhou, Eric},\n booktitle={NeurIPS},\n volume={31},\n pages={5627--5638},\n year={2018}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{goyal2017making,\n title={Making the v in vqa matter: Elevating the role of image understanding in visual question answering},\n author={Goyal, Yash and Khot, Tejas and Summers-Stay, Douglas and Batra, Dhruv and Parikh, Devi},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n pages={6904--6913},\n year={2017}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{hudson2019gqa,\n title={{GQA}: A New Dataset for Real-World Visual Reasoning and Compositional Question Answering},\n author={Hudson, Drew A and Manning, Christopher D},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n pages={6700--6709},\n year={2019}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{lu2022learn,\n title={Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering},\n author={Lu, Pan and Mishra, Swaroop and Xia, Tony and Qiu, Liang and Chang, Kai-Wei and Zhu, Song-Chun and Tafjord, Oyvind and Clark, Peter and Kalyan, Ashwin},\n booktitle={NeurIPS},\n volume={35},\n pages={2507--2521},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{li2023evaluating,\n title = {Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models},\n author = {Li, Yifan and Du, Yifan and Zhou, Kun and Wang, Jinpeng and Zhao, Xin and Wen, Ji-Rong},\n booktitle = {EMNLP},\n year = {2023},\n pages = {292--305},\n doi = {10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.20}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{liu2024mmbench,\n title={{MMBench}: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?},\n author={Liu, Yuan and Duan, Haodong and Zhang, Yuanhan and Li, Bo and Zhang, Songyang and Zhao, Wangbo and Yuan, Yike and Wang, Jiaqi and He, Conghui and Liu, Ziwei and others},\n booktitle={ECCV},\n pages={216--233},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{yu2023mm,\n title = {{MM}-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities},\n author = {Yu, Weihao and Yang, Zhengyuan and Li, Linjie and Wang, Jianfeng and Lin, Kevin and Liu, Zicheng and Wang, Xinchao and Wang, Lijuan},\n booktitle = {ICML},\n year = {2024},\n pages = {57730--57754}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{singh2019towards,\n title={Towards {VQA} Models That Can Read},\n author={Singh, Amanpreet and Natarajan, Vivek and Shah, Meet and Jiang, Yu and Chen, Xinlei and Batra, Dhruv and Parikh, Devi and Rohrbach, Marcus},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n pages={8317--8326},\n year={2019}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{masry2022chartqa,\n title={{ChartQA}: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning},\n author={Masry, Ahmed and Long, Do Xuan and Tan, Jia Qing and Joty, Shafiq and Hoque, Enamul},\n booktitle={Findings of ACL},\n pages={2263--2279},\n year={2022},\n doi={10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.177}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{kembhavi2016diagram,\n title={A diagram is worth a dozen images},\n author={Kembhavi, Aniruddha and Salvato, Mike and Kolve, Eric and Seo, Minjoon and Hajishirzi, Hannaneh and Farhadi, Ali},\n booktitle={ECCV},\n pages={235--251},\n year={2016}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{diao2025pixels,\n title={From Pixels to Words--Towards Native Vision-Language Primitives at Scale},\n author={Diao, Haiwen and Li, Mingxuan and Wu, Silei and Dai, Linjun and Wang, Xiaohua and Deng, Hanming and Lu, Lewei and Lin, Dahua and Liu, Ziwei},\n booktitle={ICLR},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{diao2026pixels,\n title={From Pixels to Words--Towards Native One-Vision Models at Scale},\n author={Diao, Haiwen and Wang, Jiahao and Wu, Penghao and Dong, Yuhao and Niu, Yuwei and Zhu, Yue and Cai, Zhongang and Fan, Weichen and Dai, Linjun and Wu, Silei and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.28820},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{diao2026sensenova,\n title={Sensenova-u1: Unifying multimodal understanding and generation with neo-unify architecture},\n author={Diao, Haiwen and Wu, Penghao and Deng, Hanming and Wang, Jiahao and Bai, Shihao and Wu, Silei and Fan, Weichen and Ye, Wenjie and Tong, Wenwen and Fan, Xiangyu and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.12500},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{kulesza2012determinantal,\n title={Determinantal Point Processes for Machine Learning},\n author={Kulesza, Alex and Taskar, Ben},\n journal={Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning},\n volume={5},\n number={2--3},\n pages={123--286},\n year={2012},\n publisher={Now Publishers},\n doi={10.1561/2200000044}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{lin2025boosting,\n title={Boosting multimodal large language models with visual tokens withdrawal for rapid inference},\n author={Lin, Zhihang and Lin, Mingbao and Lin, Luxi and Ji, Rongrong},\n booktitle={AAAI},\n volume={39},\n number={5},\n pages={5334--5342},\n year={2025},\n doi={10.1609/aaai.v39i5.32567}\n}\n@inproceedings{ye2025fit,\n title={Fit and prune: Fast and training-free visual token pruning for multi-modal large language models},\n author={Ye, Weihao and Wu, Qiong and Lin, Wenhao and Zhou, Yiyi},\n booktitle={AAAI},\n volume={39},\n number={21},\n pages={22128--22136},\n year={2025},\n doi={10.1609/aaai.v39i21.34366}\n}\n@inproceedings{chowdhury2025prompt,\n title={Prompt-CAM: Making Vision Transformers Interpretable for Fine-Grained Analysis},\n author={Chowdhury, Arpita and Paul, Dipanjyoti and Mai, Zheda and Gu, Jianyang and Zhang, Ziheng and Mehrab, Kazi Sajeed and Campolongo, Elizabeth G. and Rubenstein, Daniel and Stewart, Charles V. and Karpatne, Anuj and Berger-Wolf, Tanya and Su, Yu and Chao, Wei-Lun},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n pages={4375--4385},\n year={2025}\n}\n@inproceedings{yang2025visionzip,\n title={{VisionZip}: Longer is Better but Not Necessary in Vision Language Models},\n author={Yang, Senqiao and Chen, Yukang and Tian, Zhuotao and Wang, Chengyao and Li, Jingyao and Yu, Bei and Jia, Jiaya},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n pages={19792--19802},\n year={2025}\n}\n@inproceedings{alvar2025divprune,\n title={{DivPrune}: Diversity-based Visual Token Pruning for Large Multimodal Models},\n author={Alvar, Saeed Ranjbar and Singh, Gursimran and Akbari, Mohammad and Zhang, Yong},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n pages={9392--9401},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{wen2025stop,\n title = {Stop Looking for ``Important Tokens'' in Multimodal Language Models: Duplication Matters More},\n author = {Wen, Zichen and Gao, Yifeng and Wang, Shaobo and Zhang, Junyuan and Zhang, Qintong and Li, Weijia and He, Conghui and Zhang, Linfeng},\n booktitle = {EMNLP},\n year = {2025},\n pages = {9961--9980},\n doi = {10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.505}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2024sparsevlm,\n title = {{SparseVLM}: Visual Token Sparsification for Efficient Vision-Language Model Inference},\n author = {Zhang, Yuan and Fan, Chun{-}Kai and Ma, Junpeng and Zheng, Wenzhao and Huang, Tao and Cheng, Kuan and Gudovskiy, Denis A. and Okuno, Tomoyuki and Nakata, Yohei and Keutzer, Kurt and Zhang, Shanghang},\n booktitle = {ICML},\n pages = {74840--74857},\n year = {2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{guan2024hallusionbench,\n title={{HallusionBench}: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Models},\n author={Guan, Tianrui and Liu, Fuxiao and Wu, Xiyang and Xian, Ruiqi and Li, Zongxia and Liu, Xiaoyu and Wang, Xijun and Chen, Lichang and Huang, Furong and Yacoob, Yaser and Manocha, Dinesh and Zhou, Tianyi},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n pages={14375--14385},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2025beyond,\ntitle={Beyond Attention or Similarity: Maximizing Conditional Diversity for Token Pruning in {MLLM}s},\nauthor={Qizhe Zhang and Mengzhen Liu and Lichen Li and Ming Lu and Yuan Zhang and Junwen Pan and Qi She and Shanghang Zhang},\nbooktitle={NeurIPS},\nvolume={38},\npages={25438--25468},\nyear={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{song2024trim,\n title = {Less is More: A Simple yet Effective Token Reduction Method for Efficient Multi-modal {LLM}s},\n author = {Song, Dingjie and Wang, Wenjun and Chen, Shunian and Wang, Xidong and Guan, Michael X. and Wang, Benyou},\n booktitle = {COLING},\n year = {2025},\n pages = {7614--7623}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{xing2024pyramid,\n title={Conical Visual Concentration for Efficient Large Vision-Language Models},\n author={Xing, Long and Huang, Qidong and Dong, Xiaoyi and Lu, Jiajie and Zhang, Pan and Zang, Yuhang and Cao, Yuhang and He, Conghui and Wang, Jiaqi and Wu, Feng and Lin, Dahua},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n pages={14593--14603},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{lin2014microsoft,\n title={Microsoft {COCO}: Common Objects in Context},\n author={Lin, Tsung-Yi and Maire, Michael and Belongie, Serge and Hays, James and Perona, Pietro and Ramanan, Deva and Doll{\\'a}r, Piotr and Zitnick, C Lawrence},\n booktitle={ECCV},\n pages={740--755},\n year={2014}\n}\n\n@article{krishna2017visual,\n title={Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations},\n author={Krishna, Ranjay and Zhu, Yuke and Groth, Oliver and Johnson, Justin and Hata, Kenji and Kravitz, Joshua and Chen, Stephanie and Kalantidis, Yannis and Li, Li-Jia and Shamma, David A. and Bernstein, Michael S. and Li, Fei-Fei},\n journal={IJCV},\n volume={123},\n number={1},\n pages={32--73},\n year={2017},\n doi={10.1007/s11263-016-0981-7}\n}\n\n@article{kuznetsova2020open,\n title={The Open Images Dataset {V4}: Unified Image Classification, Object Detection, and Visual Relationship Detection at Scale},\n author={Kuznetsova, Alina and Rom, Hassan and Alldrin, Neil and Uijlings, Jasper and Krasin, Ivan and Pont-Tuset, Jordi and Kamali, Shahab and Popov, Stefan and Malloci, Matteo and Kolesnikov, Alexander and Duerig, Tom and Ferrari, Vittorio},\n journal={IJCV},\n volume={128},\n number={7},\n pages={1956--1981},\n year={2020},\n doi={10.1007/s11263-020-01316-z}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{radford2021learning,\n title={Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision},\n author={Radford, Alec and Kim, Jong Wook and Hallacy, Chris and Ramesh, Aditya and Goh, Gabriel and Agarwal, Sandhini and Sastry, Girish and Askell, Amanda and Mishkin, Pamela and Clark, Jack and Krueger, Gretchen and Sutskever, Ilya},\n booktitle={ICML},\n pages={8748--8763},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@misc{chiang2023vicuna,\n title={Vicuna: An Open-Source Chatbot Impressing GPT-4 with 90\\%* ChatGPT Quality},\n author={Chiang, Wei-Lin and Li, Zhuohan and Lin, Zi and Sheng, Ying and Wu, Zhanghao and Zhang, Hao and Zheng, Lianmin and Zhuang, Siyuan and Zhuang, Yonghao and Gonzalez, Joseph E. and Stoica, Ion and Xing, Eric P.},\n year={2023},\n month={March},\n note={Accessed: May 17, 2026}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{duan2024vlmevalkit,\n title={{VLMEvalKit}: An Open-Source {ToolKit} for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Models},\n author={Duan, Haodong and Yang, Junming and Qiao, Yuxuan and Fang, Xinyu and Chen, Lin and Liu, Yuan and Dong, Xiaoyi and Zang, Yuhang and Zhang, Pan and Wang, Jiaqi and Lin, Dahua and Chen, Kai},\n booktitle={ACM MM},\n pages={11198--11201},\n year={2024},\n doi={10.1145/3664647.3685520}\n}\n\n@article{yang2023dawn,\n title={The Dawn of {LMMs}: Preliminary Explorations with {GPT-4V}(ision)},\n author={Yang, Zhengyuan and Li, Linjie and Lin, Kevin and Wang, Jianfeng and Lin, Chung-Ching and Liu, Zicheng and Wang, Lijuan},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17421},\n year={2023},\n doi={10.48550/arXiv.2309.17421}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{song2024milebench,\n title={{MileBench}: Benchmarking {MLLM}s in Long Context},\n author={Song, Dingjie and Chen, Shunian and Chen, Guiming Hardy and Yu, Fei and Wan, Xiang and Wang, Benyou},\n booktitle={COLM},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{zhang2024video,\n title={{LLaVA-Video}: Video Instruction Tuning with Synthetic Data},\n author={Zhang, Yuanhan and Wu, Jinming and Li, Wei and Li, Bo and Ma, Zejun and Liu, Ziwei and Li, Chunyuan},\n journal={TMLR},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{li2024llavaonevision,\n title={{LLaVA}-{OneVision}: Easy Visual Task Transfer},\n author={Li, Bo and Zhang, Yuanhan and Guo, Dong and Zhang, Renrui and Li, Feng and Zhang, Hao and Zhang, Kaichen and Zhang, Peiyuan and Li, Yanwei and Liu, Ziwei and Li, Chunyuan},\n journal={TMLR},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{fu2024videomme,\n title={{Video-MME}: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal {LLM}s in Video Analysis},\n author={Fu, Chaoyou and Dai, Yuhan and Luo, Yongdong and Li, Lei and Ren, Shuhuai and Zhang, Renrui and Wang, Zihan and Zhou, Chenyu and Shen, Yunhang and Zhang, Mengdan and Chen, Peixian and Li, Yanwei and Lin, Shaohui and Zhao, Sirui and Li, Ke and Xu, Tong and Zheng, Xiawu and Chen, Enhong and Shan, Caifeng and He, Ran and Sun, Xing},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n pages={24108--24118},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{wu2024longvideobench,\n title={{LongVideoBench}: A Benchmark for Long-context Interleaved Video-Language Understanding},\n author={Wu, Haoning and Li, Dongxu and Chen, Bei and Li, Junnan},\n booktitle={NeurIPS},\n volume={37},\n pages={28828--28857},\n year={2024},\n doi={10.52202/079017-0907}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{li2024mvbench,\n title={{MVBench}: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmark},\n author={Li, Kunchang and Wang, Yali and He, Yinan and Li, Yizhuo and Wang, Yi and Liu, Yi and Wang, Zun and Xu, Jilan and Chen, Guo and Luo, Ping and Wang, Limin and Qiao, Yu},\n booktitle={CVPR},\n pages={22195--22206},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{wang2025vispruner,\n title={Beyond Text-Visual Attention: Exploiting Visual Cues for Effective Token Pruning in {VLM}s},\n author={Zhang, Qizhe and Cheng, Aosong and Lu, Ming and Zhang, Renrui and Zhuo, Zhiyong and Cao, Jiajun and Guo, Shaobo and She, Qi and Zhang, Shanghang},\n booktitle={ICCV},\n pages={20857--20867},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{huang2024prunevid,\n title={{PruneVid}: Visual Token Pruning for Efficient Video Large Language Models},\n author={Huang, Xiaohu and Zhou, Hao and Han, Kai},\n booktitle={Findings of ACL},\n pages={19959--19973},\n year={2025},\n doi={10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.1024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{shen2025fastvid,\n title={{FastVID}: Dynamic Density Pruning for Fast Video Large Language Models},\n author={Shen, Leqi and Gong, Guoqiang and He, Tao and Zhang, Yifeng and Liu, Pengzhang and Zhao, Sicheng and Ding, Guiguang},\n booktitle={NeurIPS},\n volume={38},\n pages={123553--123581},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{fan2026flashvid,\n title={{FlashVID}: Efficient Video Large Language Models via Training-free Tree-based Spatiotemporal Token Merging},\n author={Fan, Ziyang and Chen, Keyu and Xing, Ruilong and Li, Yulin and Jiang, Li and Tian, Zhuotao},\n booktitle={ICLR},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{mangalam2023egoschema,\n title={{EgoSchema}: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Very Long-form Video Language Understanding},\n author={Mangalam, Karttikeya and Akshulakov, Raiymbek and Malik, Jitendra},\n booktitle={NeurIPS},\n volume={36},\n pages={46212--46244},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{kwon2023vllm,\n title={Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with {PagedAttention}},\n author={Kwon, Woosuk and Li, Zhuohan and Zhuang, Siyuan and Sheng, Ying and Zheng, Lianmin and Yu, Cody Hao and Gonzalez, Joseph E. and Zhang, Hao and Stoica, Ion},\n booktitle={SOSP},\n pages={611--626},\n year={2023},\n doi={10.1145/3600006.3613165}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{paszke2019pytorch,\n title={{PyTorch}: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library},\n author={Paszke, Adam and Gross, Sam and Massa, Francisco and Lerer, Adam and Bradbury, James and Chanan, Gregory and Killeen, Trevor and Lin, Zeming and Gimelshein, Natalia and Antiga, Luca and Desmaison, Alban and Kopf, Andreas and Yang, Edward and DeVito, Zachary and Raison, Martin and Tejani, Alykhan and Chilamkurthy, Sasank and Steiner, Benoit and Fang, Lu and Bai, Junjie and Chintala, Soumith},\n booktitle={NeurIPS},\n volume={32},\n pages={8024--8035},\n year={2019}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2023h2o,\n title={{H2O}: Heavy-Hitter Oracle for Efficient Generative Inference of Large Language Models},\n author={Zhang, Zhenyu and Sheng, Ying and Zhou, Tianyi and Chen, Tianlong and Zheng, Lianmin and Cai, Ruisi and Song, Zhao and Tian, Yuandong and R{\\'e}, Christopher and Barrett, Clark and Wang, Zhangyang and Chen, Beidi},\n booktitle={NeurIPS},\n volume={36},\n pages={34661--34710},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{li2024snapkv,\n title={{SnapKV}: {LLM} Knows What You Are Looking for Before Generation},\n author={Li, Yuhong and Huang, Yingbing and Yang, Bowen and Venkitesh, Bharat and Locatelli, Acyr and Ye, Hanchen and Cai, Tianle and Lewis, Patrick and Chen, Deming},\n booktitle={NeurIPS},\n volume={37},\n pages={22947--22970},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{cai2024pyramidkv,\n title={Pyramid{KV}: Dynamic {KV} Cache Compression Based on Pyramidal Information Funneling},\n author={Cai, Zefan and Zhang, Yichi and Gao, Bofei and Liu, Yuliang and Li, Yucheng and Liu, Tianyu and Lu, Keming and Xiong, Wayne and Dong, Yue and Hu, Junjie and Xiao, Wen},\n booktitle={COLM},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{wan2024lookm,\n title={{LOOK}-{M}: Look-Once Optimization in {KV} Cache for Efficient Multimodal Long-Context Inference},\n author={Wan, Zhongwei and Wu, Ziang and Liu, Che and Huang, Jinfa and Zhu, Zhihong and Jin, Peng and Wang, Longyue and Yuan, Li},\n booktitle={Findings of EMNLP},\n pages={4065--4078},\n year={2024},\n doi={10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.235}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{wan2025meda,\n title={{MEDA}: Dynamic {KV} Cache Allocation for Efficient Multimodal Long-Context Inference},\n author={Wan, Zhongwei and Shen, Hui and Wang, Xin and Liu, Che and Mai, Zheda and Zhang, Mi},\n booktitle={NAACL},\n pages={2485--2497},\n year={2025},\n doi={10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.125}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2025lmmseval,\n title={{LMMs-Eval}: Reality Check on the Evaluation of Large Multimodal Models},\n author={Zhang, Kaichen and Li, Bo and Zhang, Peiyuan and Pu, Fanyi and Cahyono, Joshua Adrian and Hu, Kairui and Liu, Shuai and Zhang, Yuanhan and Yang, Jingkang and Li, Chunyuan and Liu, Ziwei},\n booktitle={Findings of NAACL},\n pages={881--916},\n year={2025},\n doi={10.18653/v1/2025.findings-naacl.51}\n}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/abstract.tex\n================================================\n\\IEEEtitleabstractindextext{%\n\\begin{abstract}\n\\justifying\nMultimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) incur prohibitive inference costs due to long visual token sequences.\n%\nTraining-free visual token reduction provides an efficient solution.\n%\nHowever, existing methods distort attention distributions, giving rise to a phenomenon we term \\emph{Attention Logit Collapse}.\n%\nTo address this issue, we propose \\textbf{ERA}, an \\textbf{E}ntropy-guided visual token pruning framework with \\textbf{R}ectified \\textbf{A}ttention for efficient MLLMs.\n%\nSpecifically, ERA comprises three crucial components: \\textbf{Dual-view Entropy Pruning (DEP)}, \\textbf{Bias-aware Token Recycling (BTR)}, and \\textbf{Logit-preserving Attention Rectification (LAR)}.\n%\nFirst, DEP identifies representative anchor tokens by jointly modeling visual diversity and head-wise saliency.\n%\nBTR then recycles pruned tokens into their corresponding anchors while estimating a cluster-level logit bias.\n%\nBuilding upon this, LAR injects the estimated bias into attention logits, effectively rectifying the collapse induced by token reduction.\n%\nTogether, these components preserve visual evidence even under aggressive compression, enabling robust performance across single-image, multi-image, and video settings on a wide range of MLLMs.\n%\nBeyond delivering practical acceleration, ERA establishes logit-preserving visual token pruning as a principled framework for efficient MLLMs, unifying theoretical foundation, algorithmic design, and practical deployment.\n%\nThe code is at \\url{https://github.com/924973292/ERA}.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\\begin{IEEEkeywords}\nMultimodal Large Language Model, Visual Token Pruning, Efficient Inference, Attention Rectification\n\\end{IEEEkeywords}\n}\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/biography.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{IEEEbiography}[{\\includegraphics[width=1in,height=1.24in,clip,keepaspectratio]{Authors/YHWang.jpg}}]{Yuhao Wang} received the B.E. degree in Artificial Intelligence from the School of Future Technology, Dalian University of Technology (DUT), Dalian, China, in 2024. He is pursuing the M.S. degree in Artificial Intelligence at the School of Computer Science, DUT. His research interests include efficient large language models and multimodal fusion.\n\\end{IEEEbiography}\n\\begin{IEEEbiography}[{\\includegraphics[width=1in,height=1.24in,clip,keepaspectratio]{Authors/MQiao.jpg}}]{Mu Qiao}\n is currently pursuing the B.E. degree in Software Engineering at the School of Software, Dalian University of Technology (DUT), Dalian, China. His research interests include multimodal large models and efficient vision-language models.\n \\end{IEEEbiography}\n\\begin{IEEEbiography}[{\\includegraphics[width=1in,height=1.24in,clip,keepaspectratio]{Authors/HWDiao.jpg}}]{Haiwen Diao} received the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees from Dalian University of Technology (DUT), Dalian, China. He is currently a Research Fellow at MMLab, Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. His research interests include computer vision and artificial intelligence, with a focus on native multimodal models, vision-language understanding and generation, and inference-time reasoning.\n\\end{IEEEbiography}\n\\begin{IEEEbiography}[{\\includegraphics[width=1in,height=1.24in,clip,keepaspectratio]{Authors/ZGYunZhi.jpg}}]{Yunzhi Zhuge} received the B.E. degree in electrical engineering from Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China, in 2017, the M.S. degree in biomedical engineering from Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China, in 2019, and the Ph.D. degree in computer science from the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia, in 2023. He is currently a postdoctoral researcher at Dalian University of Technology.\n\\end{IEEEbiography}\n\\begin{IEEEbiography}[{\\includegraphics[width=1in,height=1.24in,clip,keepaspectratio]{Authors/PP.jpg}}]{Pingping Zhang} received the B.E. degree in mathematics and applied mathematics from Henan Normal University (HNU), Xinxiang, China, in 2012, and the Ph.D. degree in signal and information processing from the Dalian University of Technology (DUT), Dalian, China, in 2020. He is currently an Associate Professor with the School of Future Technology and the School of Artificial Intelligence, DUT. He has authored over 70 papers in top-tier journals and conferences. His research interests include deep learning, saliency detection, person re-identification, and semantic segmentation.\n\\end{IEEEbiography}\n\\begin{IEEEbiography}[{\\includegraphics[width=1in,height=1.24in,clip,keepaspectratio]{Authors/XDZhang.jpg}}]{Xindong Zhang} received the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees from Xiamen University, Xiamen, China, Dalian University of Technology (DUT), Dalian, China, and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, respectively. He is currently with OPPO, where he works on AI ISP algorithm engineering and technical planning. His research interests include numerical optimization and applications, lightweight AI model design, and AI-based computational imaging.\n\\end{IEEEbiography}\n\\begin{IEEEbiography}[{\\includegraphics[width=1in,height=1.24in,clip,keepaspectratio]{Authors/LZHang.jpg}}]{Lei Zhang} (IEEE Fellow) received the B.Sc. degree from Shenyang Institute of Aeronautical Engineering, Shenyang, China, in 1995, and the M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in control theory and engineering from Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China, in 1998 and 2001, respectively. From 2001 to 2002, he was a Research Associate with the Department of Computing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. From 2003 to 2006, he was a Postdoctoral Fellow with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, McMaster University, Canada. In 2006, he joined the Department of Computing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, as an Assistant Professor. Since 2017, he has been a Chair Professor in the same department. His research interests include computer vision, image and video analysis, pattern recognition, and biometrics. He has published more than 200 papers in these areas. As of 2022, his publications have been cited more than 80,000 times. He is a Senior Associate Editor of IEEE Transactions on Image Processing and has served as an Associate Editor of IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, and Image and Vision Computing. He was named a Clarivate Analytics Highly Cited Researcher from 2015 to 2022.\n\\end{IEEEbiography}\n\\begin{IEEEbiography}[{\\includegraphics[width=1in,height=1.24in,clip,keepaspectratio]{Authors/HCLu.jpg}}]{Huchuan Lu} (IEEE Fellow) received the MS degree in signal and information processing and the Ph.D. degree in systems engineering from the Dalian University of Technology (DUT), Dalian, China, in 1998 and 2008, respectively. In 1988, he joined the faculty of the School of Information and Communication Engineering, DUT, where he is currently a full professor. He is also the Dean of the School of Future Technology, DUT. His current research interests include computer vision and artificial intelligence with a focus on visual tracking, and multimodal large language models.\n\\end{IEEEbiography}\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/conclusion.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Conclusion}\n\\label{sec:conclusion}\nIn this paper, we revisit visual token reduction in MLLMs from the perspective of attention behavior.\n%\nWe show that effective token reduction requires not only selecting a compact set of visual tokens, but also preserving a compatible attention distribution after compression to avoid the overlooked phenomenon we term \\emph{Attention Logit Collapse}.\n%\nTo this end, we propose \\textbf{ERA}, a training-free token reduction framework that integrates entropy-guided token pruning with rectified attention.\n%\nSpecifically, we leverage \\textbf{Dual-view Entropy Pruning (DEP)} to capture both diversity and saliency.\n%\nThen, we employ \\textbf{Bias-aware Token Recycling (BTR)} to recycle tokens by estimating a bias in each cluster.\n%\nFinally, we adopt \\textbf{Logit-preserving Attention Rectification (LAR)} to maintain the distribution in a kernel-friendly manner.\n%\nExtensive experiments across MLLM architectures, resolutions and benchmark settings demonstrate that ERA achieves robust and efficient inference under aggressive token reduction.\n%\nBeyond accelerating MLLM inference, ERA highlights \\emph{Attention Logit Collapse} as a neglected failure mode in current training-free visual token reduction methods and provides a unified solution across theory, algorithm and deployment.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/experiment.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Experiments}\n\\subsection{Experimental Setup}\n\\label{ssec:setup}\nWe perform experiments to verify whether ERA preserves visual information, transfers across input regimes and yields practical inference gains under aggressive token reduction.\n%\nWe first evaluate single-image understanding across diverse MLLM architectures, resolutions and benchmarks.\n%\nWe then evaluate longer visual contexts, including multi-image and video understanding.\n%\nFinally, we analyze module contributions and deployment efficiency.\n%\nUnless otherwise specified, all experiments follow the official evaluation protocols.\n\\subsubsection{Models and Evaluation Scope}\n\\label{sssec:models}\nWe evaluate ERA on representative MLLMs that cover different visual-token generation paradigms.\n%\n\\textbf{LLaVA-1.5}~\\cite{liu2024improved} serves as the standard image-understanding backbone. It couples a CLIP~\\cite{radford2021learning} vision encoder with a Vicuna~\\cite{chiang2023vicuna} language model through an MLP projector, producing 576 visual tokens from $336 \\times 336$ inputs.\n%\n\\textbf{LLaVA-NeXT}~\\cite{liu2024llavanext} represents the high-resolution setting. Dynamic grid pinning partitions each $672 \\times 672$ image into multiple subimages aligned with the encoder's fixed resolution. These subimages are encoded independently and then concatenated, producing 2{,}880 visual tokens per image. This creates a substantially more severe redundancy problem.\n%\nFor both families, we utilize the 7B and 13B variants to assess ERA's scalability across model capacity.\n%\nTo verify architectural generality, we further evaluate \\textbf{Qwen2.5-VL}~\\cite{bai2025qwen2}. \n%\nIts vision backbone builds on a Vision Transformer~\\cite{dosovitskiy2021image} and incorporates RMSNorm~\\cite{zhang2019root}, SwiGLU activations~\\cite{shazeer2020glu} and window-based attention~\\cite{liu2021swin}. \n%\nAn MLP-based Merger then fuses spatially adjacent patch features before feeding tokens into the LLM under dynamic-resolution inputs.\n%\nWe then adopt \\textbf{InternVL3}~\\cite{zhu2025internvl3} as an additional strong MLLM to stress-test architectural robustness beyond the LLaVA and Qwen series.\n%\nFinally, we evaluate \\textbf{NEO}~\\cite{diao2025pixels}, a native MLLM that jointly processes visual and textual tokens in a single backbone. \n%\nFor longer visual contexts with multiple images, ERA is transferred to LLaVA-1.5 on MileBench~\\cite{song2024milebench}. \n%\nBeyond multi-image reasoning, we also apply ERA to \\textbf{LLaVA-Video}~\\cite{zhang2024video} and \\textbf{LLaVA-OneVision}~\\cite{li2024llavaonevision} for video understanding.\n\\input{tables/LLAVA_ALL.tex}\n\\input{tables/main_LLAVA_13B.tex}\n\\subsubsection{Benchmarks}\n\\label{sssec:benchmarks}\nFor single-image evaluation, we group the benchmarks by the visual information required by each task.\n%\nGeneral visual question answering and reasoning are evaluated with VQA$^{\\text{v2}}$~\\cite{goyal2017making}, GQA~\\cite{hudson2019gqa} and SQA$^{\\text{I}}$~\\cite{lu2022learn}. These benchmarks test whether compressed tokens preserve object-level semantics, commonsense cues and scientific reasoning information. We report results on the VQA$^{\\text{v2}}$ test-dev split, the GQA balanced test-dev split and the SQA image subset.\n%\nFine-grained text, chart and diagram understanding are evaluated with VQA$^{\\text{T}}$~\\cite{singh2019towards}, ChartQA~\\cite{masry2022chartqa} and AI2D~\\cite{kembhavi2016diagram}. These benchmarks depend on local visual details, embedded text and layout structure. We evaluate them on the official validation, test and test splits, respectively.\n%\nThe comprehensive multimodal capability is measured by MME~\\cite{fu2025mme}, MMB$^{\\text{E}}$~\\cite{liu2024mmbench}, MMB$^{\\text{C}}$~\\cite{liu2024mmbench} and MMVet~\\cite{yu2023mm}. Together, they cover perception, OCR, bilingual multiple-choice reasoning under CircularEval and open-ended LLM-judged multimodal assessment.\n%\nThe object hallucination analysis is evaluated with POPE~\\cite{li2023evaluating} on COCO~\\cite{lin2014microsoft} and HaluBench~\\cite{guan2024hallusionbench}. These benchmarks probe whether pruning methods retain the information for object presence and visual contradiction checking.\n%\nFor multi-image reasoning, MileBench~\\cite{song2024milebench} measures cross-image understanding, retrieval-oriented reasoning and long-context aggregation.\n%\nFor video understanding, we follow the frame-based settings on VideoMME~\\cite{fu2024videomme}, LongVideoBench~\\cite{wu2024longvideobench} and MVBench~\\cite{li2024mvbench}. \n%\nThese benchmarks extend the evaluation from spatial redundancy to repeated temporal context.\n\\subsubsection{Implementation Details}\n\\label{sssec:impl}\nOn image benchmarks, for the LLaVA-1.5 and LLaVA-NeXT series, we use the official evaluation implementations.\n%\nFor Qwen2.5-VL, InternVL3 and NEO, we adopt VLMEvalKit~\\cite{duan2024vlmevalkit} to ensure consistent and reproducible evaluation.\n%\nOn video benchmarks, for LLaVA-Video and LLaVA-OneVision, we use lmms-eval~\\cite{zhang2025lmmseval} to follow the standard video evaluation protocol.\n%\nAll evaluations are implemented in PyTorch~\\cite{paszke2019pytorch} and conducted on a single NVIDIA A800 GPU. The same setup is used for task performance and efficiency analysis, including latency measurement.\n%\nFor Qwen2.5-VL, window-based attention is used in most vision blocks. Only the last vision block performs global attention over the full visual token sequence.\n%\nWe therefore extract the attention map from this last global-attention block to ensure that the head-wise entropy is computed from globally comparable interactions rather than from window-restricted attention.\n%\nSince Qwen2.5-VL has no CLS token, we adopt a CLS-free formulation. We average attention over all query positions per head before entropy computation. \n%\nTo remain consistent with Qwen's MLP-Merger, we also average the resulting pre-merge entropy and auxiliary features within each merge group.\n%\nFor a fair comparison, we adapt CDPruner~\\cite{zhang2025beyond} to Qwen2.5-VL following its protocol for models without a text encoder. The text guidance is derived by averaging instruction-token embeddings, replacing the original CLIP-style pooling.\n%\nFor InternVL3, we use the default CLS-token attention readout adopted by the LLaVA series. \n%\nNo architecture-specific adaptation is required because its vision encoder also provides a CLS token.\n%\nNEO does not expose a separate vision encoder. \n%\nWe therefore perform pruning during the prefill pass at the twelfth layer, the endpoint of the pre-Buffer stage. \n%\nMeanwhile, we extract the submatrix of visual tokens from the full attention map and average it over all query positions per head before entropy computation.\n%\nAcross all models, we set the bias-floor parameter in Eq.~\\eqref{eq:bias_weight} to $\\lambda=0.3$.\n%\nFor other hyperparameters, we set the balance factor $\\alpha=0.5$ and the regularization weight $\\eta=0.1$ in all experiments unless otherwise specified.\n%\n\\input{tables/extra_milebench.tex}\n\\input{tables/main_Qwen2.5-VL-7B.tex}\n\\input{tables/extra_internvl3.tex}\n\\input{tables/main_NEO_2B.tex}\n\\subsection{Single-image Evaluation}\n\\label{ssec:single_image}\nSingle-image evaluation is the primary test of whether visual token reduction preserves the information required for perception, OCR, chart reasoning, grounding and multimodal instruction following.\n%\nWe begin with the LLaVA family under extreme compression in Tab.~\\ref{tab:extreme_pruning_combined_all}, retaining 32 tokens for LLaVA-1.5 and 160 tokens for LLaVA-NeXT.\n%\nWe then evaluate token-budget robustness on LLaVA-1.5-13B and extend the comparison to Qwen2.5-VL-7B, InternVL3-8B and NEO-2B.\n%\nTogether, these settings evaluate ERA across different compression levels, model sizes and architectures.\n\\noindent\\textbf{Main Results on the LLaVA Family.}\nWe analyze the LLaVA series across four regimes covering compression strength, model capacity, input resolution and reasoning difficulty.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textit{(1) Effectiveness in Standard Compression Regimes.}\nWe first evaluate LLaVA-1.5-7B with 32 retained tokens.\n%\nERA maintains an average retention of 93.4\\%, with particularly strong performance on fine-grained perception tasks.\n%\nNotably, ERA outperforms CDPruner by \\textbf{2.5\\%} on MMB$^{\\text{C}}$, showing stronger preservation of semantic anchors for reasoning.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textit{(2) Scalability with Increased Model Capacity.}\nWhen scaling to LLaVA-1.5-13B, ERA maintains 94.5\\% of the upper-bound performance, surpassing CDPruner by \\textbf{1.5\\%}.\n%\nBy selecting informative tokens, ERA allows the model to operate with a compact visual context without losing critical information.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textit{(3) Robustness in High-Resolution Scenarios.}\nOn the LLaVA-NeXT series, ERA achieves the highest average performance of 95.8\\% on LLaVA-NeXT-7B. It also outperforms CDPruner by \\textbf{0.6\\%} on VQA$^{\\text{v2}}$, indicating effective redundancy filtering.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textit{(4) Robustness in Complex Reasoning.}\nFinally, on LLaVA-NeXT-13B, ERA remains competitive on average and is especially strong on benchmarks requiring complex reasoning and domain knowledge.\n%\nOn MMB$^{\\text{E}}$, ERA reaches 67.5\\%, surpassing the prior best performance by 1.6\\%.\n%\nThese results show that ERA preserves the discriminative details required for high-level understanding under extreme compression.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{Token-budget Robustness on LLaVA-1.5-13B.}\nWe further evaluate ERA on the larger 13B backbone under more moderate budgets in Tab.~\\ref{tab:cdpruner_t3_llava15_13b}.\n%\nAcross all three budgets, ERA ranks among the top methods in averaged performance, indicating robust behavior under both aggressive and mild visual token reduction.\n%\nUnder the 32-token setting in Tab.~\\ref{tab:extreme_pruning_combined_all}, ERA achieves the best results on six of nine benchmarks, with clear gains on VQA$^{\\text{v2}}$ and VQA$^{\\text{T}}$.\n%\nOn the fine-grained benchmark MMB$^{\\text{C}}$, ERA reaches 59.4\\%, compared with 56.6\\% for CDPruner. This gain of 2.8\\% suggests better preservation of semantically critical visual anchors under tight information bottlenecks.\n%\nAs the budget increases to 64 and 128 tokens in Tab.~\\ref{tab:cdpruner_t3_llava15_13b}, the performance recovers smoothly on individual benchmarks. \n%\nERA still ranks first in averaged retention at both budgets, reaching 96.9\\% at 64 tokens and 98.0\\% at 128 tokens.\n%\nOverall, ERA remains strong on fine-grained tasks across the entire range from 32 to 128 tokens, indicating a balanced preservation of local details and global context.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{Generalization to Advanced MLLMs.}\nWe verify the architectural generalization of ERA on three MLLM backbones whose visual-token generation paradigms differ substantially from the LLaVA family.\n%\nWe present the results in order of increasing architectural deviations.\n%\nWe start with the dynamic-resolution Qwen2.5-VL, move to another image-domain InternVL3, and finally to the encoder-free NEO.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textit{(1) Dynamic-resolution Qwen2.5-VL-7B.}\nAs shown in Tab.~\\ref{tab:qwen2.5_vl_7b_comparison_v3}, ERA remains robust under progressive token reduction.\n%\nAt 50\\% tokens, ERA retains 98.5\\% of the full-token performance and reaches 82.7\\% on ChartQA, compared with 69.5\\% for CDPruner.\n%\nUnder the 20\\% budget, ERA improves ChartQA from 52.0\\% to 70.2\\% over CDPruner and raises averaged retention from 83.8\\% to 94.1\\%.\n%\nThese results show that ERA remains effective under dynamic-resolution inputs, particularly for OCR and reasoning sensitive to layout.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textit{(2) Image-domain InternVL3-8B.}\nInternVL3-8B provides an additional strong image-domain backbone for testing architectural robustness.\n%\nAs shown in Tab.~\\ref{tab:extra_internvl3}, ERA achieves better performance than VisionZip under both 256 and 128 token settings.\n%\nCompared with DivPrune, ERA improves the performance across all benchmarks at both budgets, with clear gains on VQA$^{\\text{T}}$ and MME.\n%\nThese results demonstrate that ERA can effectively generalize to InternVL3.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textit{(3) Encoder-free NEO-2B.}\nERA generalizes consistently to NEO-2B as shown in Tab.~\\ref{tab:neo_2b_final_corrected}, achieving 98.4\\% retention at 50\\% tokens.\n%\nOn fine-grained tasks, ERA attains 60.5\\% on VQA$^{\\text{T}}$ and 73.7\\% on AI2D at 10\\% tokens.\n%\nERA also outperforms CDPruner on VQA$^{\\text{T}}$, improving the score from 52.9\\% to 60.5\\%. On POPE, the score increases from 78.0\\% to 87.9\\%.\n%\nThese results support the generalization of ERA on advanced architectures beyond LLaVA-style MLLMs.\n\\input{tables/extra_llava_video.tex}\n\\subsection{Multi-image Evaluation}\n\\label{ssec:multi_image}\nWe next evaluate multi-image reasoning, where redundancy is distributed across images.\n%\nThis setting tests whether the retained tokens still support cross-image aggregation and retrieval-oriented reasoning after token compression.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{Multi-image Long-context Results.}\nWe evaluate ERA on MileBench, where each method retains approximately 58 visual tokens per image. This budget corresponds to a 10\\% retention ratio for LLaVA-1.5-7B.\n%\nAs shown in Tab.~\\ref{tab:extra_milebench}, ERA is competitive with both long-context cache-compression baselines and transferable image-token reduction baselines in multi-image scenarios.\n%\nERA achieves the best average score, reaching 32.6\\% and retaining 101.6\\% of the full-cache upper bound.\n%\nCompared with MEDA, ERA improves the average score from 31.7\\% to 32.6\\% and performs better in 8 out of 11 categories.\n%\nThe gains are most pronounced on T-4, S-5, NH and IR.\n%\nThese experiments demonstrate that ERA can effectively handle multi-image long-context reasoning.\n\\subsection{Video Evaluation}\n\\label{ssec:video}\nWe further evaluate ERA on video understanding tasks.\n%\n% Although our proposed ERA is specifically designed for image-token reduction, video MLLMs also process long visual sequences when many frames are encoded jointly.\n%\nThis setting examines whether ERA can extend to video inputs without introducing temporal-specific modules.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{Video Understanding Results.}\nAcross video MLLMs, ERA remains competitive with general image-pruning baselines such as FastV and VisionZip.\n%\nWith LLaVA-Video-7B at 25\\% retention, ERA reaches 60.2\\% on LongVideoBench and 60.5\\% on MVBench. The latter matches FastVID under the same token budget. Its average accuracy reaches 60.3\\%, corresponding to 97.5\\% of the full-token model.\n%\nUnder the same 25\\% video setting, a separate LAR ablation with LLaVA-Video-7B shows that adding LAR yields 60.2\\% on LongVideoBench, improving the accuracy by 1.8\\% and confirming the effectiveness of attention rectification under long-context visual inputs.\n%\nAt around 10\\% retention, ERA maintains competitive performance on VideoMME. \n%\nWith LLaVA-Video-7B, it obtains 57.7\\% on MVBench and an average accuracy of 57.6\\%.\n%\nWithin transferable image-pruning methods, ERA achieves the best average accuracy and the strongest result on LongVideoBench.\n%\nThese results show that our proposed modules transfer effectively to video long-context inference, remaining competitive with video-specific methods without explicit temporal modeling.\n\\subsection{Module Effectiveness Verification}\n\\label{ssec:module}\nIn this section, we evaluate the effectiveness of ERA with detailed module ablations, readout stability analysis, layer-wise LAR analysis and attention-restoration verification.\n\\input{tables/main_ablation.tex}\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{Analysis of Key Modules.}\nTab.~\\ref{tab:ablation_main} isolates the contribution of each component.\n%\nDEP($\\mathbf{x}$) preserves representative visual patterns across compression ratios and achieves 94.6\\% retention at 64 tokens.\n%\nDEP($\\mathbf{y}$) drops to 90.4\\%, indicating that saliency without diversity is insufficient to maintain global semantics.\n%\nCombining DEP($\\mathbf{x}$) with DEP($\\mathbf{y}$) consistently improves robustness, confirming the complementarity of visual diversity and entropy-guided saliency.\n%\nIntroducing BTR further enhances performance under aggressive compression, improving retention by up to \\textbf{1.0\\%} at 32 tokens.\n%\nLAR increases the average retention from 93.7\\% to \\textbf{95.1\\%}, effectively rectifying attention logit shifts caused by severe token reduction.\n%\nThese results confirm the contribution of each module under varying compression budgets.\n\\input{tables/extra_cls_free_common.tex}\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{CLS and AVG Readout Stability.}\nERA uses head-wise attention entropy to estimate visual-token saliency. When the vision encoder provides a CLS token, the default implementation uses the CLS-token attention row as the saliency readout.\n%\nFor architectures without a CLS token, this readout can be replaced by average pooling over all patch-token attention rows.\n%\nTo verify that ERA does not depend on this design choice, we compare CLS and average readouts with the LLaVA-1.5-7B and LLaVA-NeXT-7B backbones in Tab.~\\ref{tab:extra_cls_free_common}.\n%\nThe close agreement with the LLaVA family indicates that ERA's entropy-based saliency is not inherently tied to the CLS token.\n%\nThis conclusion is further supported by the results of CLS-free architectures.\n%\nFor Qwen2.5-VL, ERA computes entropy from the last global-attention block and remains effective under dynamic-resolution inputs, as shown in Tab.~\\ref{tab:qwen2.5_vl_7b_comparison_v3}.\n%\nFor NEO-2B, which is encoder-free and has no vision-encoder CLS token, ERA still preserves strong performance in Tab.~\\ref{tab:neo_2b_final_corrected}. These results show that the entropy readout can be adapted to the available attention structure rather than depending on a specific CLS-token design.\n\\input{tables/extra_lar_layer_strategy.tex}\n\\begin{figure*}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{images/lar_mechanism_verification.pdf}\n \\caption{LAR verification with \\textbf{LLaVA-1.5-7B} on VQA$^{\\text{T}}$. (a) Joint trajectory of attention logit error and token-group KL divergence, where arrows indicate the shift from Collapsed to LAR toward the dense-reference distribution. (b) Signed attention logit deviation from the unpruned model. (c) Token-group KL divergence to the grouped unpruned attention distribution. (d) Layer-wise recovery of attention logit error and group-level KL.}\n \\label{fig:extra_lar_mechanism}\n\\end{figure*}\n\\input{tables/main_Efficiency.tex}\n\\input{tables/extra_lar_overhead.tex}\n\\input{tables/extra_vllm_deployment_rowwise.tex}\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{LAR Strategy across Layers.}\nWe further examine whether LAR requires an explicit bias across layers.\n%\nWithout explicit layer-wise scheduling, ERA stays within 0.25\\% of the tested strategies, keeping LAR simple and efficient.\n%\nThis confirms that LAR is not sensitive to layer-wise scheduling.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{LAR Mechanism Verification.}\nLAR is designed to correct the attention mismatch after compression caused by token reduction.\n%\nTo verify this mechanism, we analyze all 32 LLM layers on the full VQA$^{\\text{T}}$ validation set with LLaVA-1.5-7B under the $576 \\rightarrow 144$ compression setting.\n%\nWe compare the unpruned model, the compressed model without LAR, and the compressed model with LAR.\n%\nThe compressed model without LAR is denoted as Collapsed.\n%\nWe measure relative attention logit deviation and token-group KL divergence against the unpruned reference.\n%\nAs shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:extra_lar_mechanism}, Collapsed systematically underestimates visual attention after token merging.\n%\nAfter applying LAR, the mean absolute logit deviation decreases from 23.0\\% to 8.2\\%, and several layers move close to the dense-reference region.\n%\nAt the group-distribution level, the mean token-group KL decreases from 0.90 to 0.40. The layer-wise recovery reaches 68\\% for logit error and 54\\% for group-level KL.\n%\nThese results show that LAR directly restores attention statistics distorted by token reduction, rather than only improving the final accuracy.\n\\subsection{Efficiency and Deployment Analysis}\n\\label{ssec:efficiency}\nIn this section, we examine the efficiency and deployment analysis of our proposed method, covering computational cost, LAR overhead and vLLM~\\cite{kwon2023efficient} deployment benefits.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{Analysis of Efficiency.}\nTab.~\\ref{tab:efficiency_comparison_1_6_final} compares computational efficiency and retained accuracy.\n%\nWith ERA, reducing 2{,}880 visual tokens to 160 lowers FLOPs by $11.8\\times$, from 66.1 TFLOPs to 5.6 TFLOPs. \n%\nThe end-to-end (E2E) latency improves by $2.7\\times$, and prefill is accelerated by $4.6\\times$, decreasing from 415 ms to 91 ms.\n%\nThe KV cache memory drops from 1.44 GB to 0.08 GB.\n%\nBeyond efficiency, ERA achieves 95.8\\% performance, which is 5.3\\% higher than DART.\n%\nThese results show that ERA provides a better trade-off.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{LAR Overhead in Standard Inference.}\nWe further verify the practical overhead of our LAR on GQA, using a compressed visual sequence of 160 tokens with FlashAttention v2.7.3.\n%\nTab.~\\ref{tab:extra_lar_overhead} shows that LAR introduces no measurable overhead in end-to-end inference. \n%\nThe latency difference remains within measurement noise while the peak GPU memory usage is unchanged.\n%\nMeanwhile, the performance on GQA improves by 0.87\\%.\n%\nThese results confirm that LAR can be deployed without incurring additional latency or memory cost, while still providing a significant accuracy boost.\n%\n% Although isolated attention microbenchmarks for a single layer can show visible relative overhead due to very small kernel times, the absolute cost is diluted in full inference by MLP computation, vision encoding, projection, layer normalization and runtime scheduling.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{vLLM Deployment Results.}\nWe further evaluate ERA in a practical vLLM serving setup using LLaVA-NeXT-7B.\n%\nAs shown in Tab.~\\ref{tab:extra_vllm_deployment_rowwise}, ERA consistently improves deployment efficiency across different batch sizes while remaining compatible with the standard vLLM serving pipeline.\n%\nAt Batch=256, ERA reduces the prefill sequence length from 1845 to 373 tokens, leading to a $4.3\\times$ reduction in LLM prefill latency and a $5.0\\times$ reduction in per-request KV cache usage.\n%\nThis memory reduction is particularly important for high-throughput serving. Under a full batching, the original baseline requires approximately 244 GB of GPU memory, which exceeds the capacity of a single 80 GB A800 GPU. In contrast, ERA reduces the peak memory footprint to only 59.69 GB, enabling the entire batch to be served on a single device without batch partitioning.\n%\nThe deployment benefit also generalizes across different scheduling regimes. ERA achieves $3.2\\times$ prefill acceleration at Batch=48 and still maintains a $2.4\\times$ speedup at Batch=1.\n%\nImportantly, the decode throughput remains nearly unchanged, indicating that ERA primarily accelerates the prefill stage without introducing additional overhead to the decode path.\n%\nIn the same vLLM deployment setting, ERA also preserves task performance under aggressive token pruning, improving VQA$^{\\text{T}}$ accuracy from 49.19\\% to 56.87\\% and POPE average accuracy from 86.59\\% to 88.25\\%.\n%\nOverall, these results demonstrate that ERA provides practical deployment advantages while maintaining compatibility with optimized vLLM pipelines.\n\\subsection{Sensitivity Analysis}\n\\label{ssec:hyper}\nIn this section, we examine the sensitivity of ERA to its main hyperparameters: the balance factor $\\alpha$ and the regularization weight $\\eta$.\n%\nMeanwhile, we also explore the effect of pruning depths on the encoder-free architecture NEO.\n\\input{images_tex/hyper.tex}\n\\begin{figure}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\vspace{-3mm}\n \\includegraphics[width=0.485\\textwidth]{images/NEO_ablation.pdf}\n \\caption{Pruning-depth sensitivity with \\textbf{NEO-2B}.}\n \\label{fig:neo_ablation}\n\\end{figure}\n\\begin{figure*}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\textwidth]{images/appendix1.pdf}\n \\caption{Head-wise attention visualizations and token pruning results with \\textbf{LLaVA-1.5-7B} on the VQA$^{\\text{T}}$ dataset.}\n \\label{fig:appendix_fig1}\n \\vspace{-2mm}\n\\end{figure*}\n\\input{images_tex/vis1.tex}\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{Analysis of Hyperparameters.}\nFig.~\\ref{fig:hyperparameters} analyzes the sensitivity of ERA to $\\alpha$ and $\\eta$.\n%\nOverall, ERA remains stable across a wide range of values for both hyperparameters.\n%\nSpecifically, Fig.~\\ref{fig:hyperparameters} (a) indicates that varying $\\alpha$ yields consistently strong performance across datasets.\n%\nIn both the 32-token and 64-token settings, the curves fluctuate only mildly across the tested values.\n%\nFig.~\\ref{fig:hyperparameters} (b) shows that the performance is insensitive to $\\eta$.\n%\nAcross datasets and token budgets, the curves remain stable, indicating that the entropy-guided regularization is not sensitive to the hyperparameter values.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{Pruning-depth Verification in NEO.}\nUnlike modular MLLMs that decouple vision encoders from language backbones, NEO integrates raw visual patches directly into a unified transformer with naive attention.\n%\nIn this setting, the pruning depth determines when the visual-token sequence is compressed.\n%\nFig.~\\ref{fig:neo_ablation} summarizes an ablation over pruning depths on NEO-2B.\n%\nPruning too early degrades performance across benchmarks. At 20\\% token retention, the average score rises from 67.1\\% at layer 2 to 75.1\\% across layers 10 to 14. At 10\\% retention, the corresponding average rises from 53.9\\% to 72.5\\%.\n%\nIn contrast, pruning at deeper layers yields stable results, with the stronger-performance region spanning layers 10 to 14 around the end of the pre-Buffer stage.\n%\nThis phenomenon matches the design of NEO, where the pre-Buffer stage ends at the 12th layer.\n%\nThus, we choose the 12th layer as the default pruning depth for different pruning methods on NEO-2B for fair comparison.\n\\subsection{Qualitative Visualizations}\n\\label{ssec:vis}\nIn the final section of experiments, we provide qualitative visualizations of ERA's head-wise attention distribution and token pruning results under different DEP criteria in Tab.~\\ref{tab:ablation_main}.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{Bias of Head-averaged Attention.}\nFig.~\\ref{fig:appendix_fig1} presents a qualitative comparison between averaged attention maps and the activation patterns of individual attention heads across various inputs.\n%\nObserving the \\textit{Averaged Attention} column, the heatmaps exhibit a smoothed distribution that fails to distinctively highlight specific regions.\n%\nIn contrast, the visualization of \\textit{Different Attention Heads} reveals that semantic information is sparsely encoded in specific heads. \n%\nThese heads act as sharp detectors for instruction-aligned features, such as the clock face or airplane code, but their signals are diluted when aggregated.\n%\nThis discrepancy shows that simple head-averaging can mask critical tokens.\n%\nAs shown in the \\textit{Pruned Output}, DEP mitigates this averaging bias. \n%\nIt isolates the visual anchors required to answer the prompt while discarding background redundancy.\n%\nThese results support the motivation for incorporating head-wise attention entropy as a novel criterion for token importance estimation, generating more reliable pruning decisions.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{Visualization of Token Pruning.}\nFig.~\\ref{fig:vis_token_pruning} visualizes token pruning results based on different DEP criteria.\n%\nDiversity-based DEP focuses on high-variance background regions, whereas saliency-based DEP favors the dominant object but may miss fine-grained details.\n%\nDEP jointly balances saliency and diversity, leading to more reliable token pruning.\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/introduction.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Introduction}\n\\label{sec:intro}\n\\IEEEPARstart{M}{ultimodal} Large Language Models (MLLMs) extend Large Language Models (LLMs) to the visual domain~\\cite{liu2024improved} by integrating visual tokens into the language backbone, achieving strong performance on diverse tasks.\n%\nHowever, modern vision encoders~\\cite{chen2024internvl} generally include hundreds to thousands of visual tokens, making computation and memory scale poorly~\\cite{chen2024image}.\n%\nThis redundancy becomes more severe for high-resolution images, multi-image inputs and video sequences, where visual tokens dominate the prefill stage and inflate the cache.\n%\nThus, training-free visual token reduction~\\cite{shao2025tokens} has become a practical solution for accelerating MLLM inference without retraining the model.\n\nRecently, great progress has been made in this direction.\n%\nFor example, FastV~\\cite{chen2024image} shows that many visual tokens can be removed after early LLM layers according to attention statistics.\n%\nDivPrune~\\cite{alvar2025divprune} and CDPruner~\\cite{zhang2025beyond} improve token selection by emphasizing diversity and instruction relevance.\n%\nVisionZip~\\cite{yang2025visionzip} further combines token selection with token merging to preserve compact visual representations.\n%\nThese methods demonstrate that substantial visual token redundancy exists in MLLM inference.\n\nDespite great progress, existing methods suffer from two fundamental limitations.\n%\nThe first lies in token importance estimation.\n%\nMost methods prune or merge tokens using a single criterion, such as visual diversity~\\cite{alvar2025divprune} or sparsity~\\cite{chen2024image}.\n%\nEven when the diversity and sparsity are combined~\\cite{yang2025visionzip}, these methods overlook the attention patterns across different heads~\\cite{chowdhury2025prompt}.\n%\nAs shown in \\erahighlight{Fig.~\\ref{fig:motivation} (a)}, the averaged attention can obscure tokens that are critical to specific heads.\n%\nWe find that such head-specific tokens exhibit low entropies in their attention distributions.\n%\nThey concentrate on salient regions, motivating information entropy as an auxiliary criterion for token importance estimation.\n%\nMore importantly, we identify a previously overlooked phenomenon in current MLLMs, termed \\emph{Attention Logit Collapse}.\n%\nIn \\erahighlight{Fig.~\\ref{fig:motivation} (b)}, we compare the distribution of attention logits across token types under four settings.\n%\nIn the baseline with a full sequence, visual tokens account for 61\\% of the attention logit, whereas system and instruction tokens account for 35\\% and 4\\%, respectively.\n%\nAfter pruning, the distribution shifts significantly.\n%\nThe fraction of attention logits assigned to visual tokens drops to 18\\%, whereas system and instruction tokens increase to 68\\% and 14\\%, respectively.\n%\nThis shift suggests that pruning suppresses visual attention and highlights non-visual tokens.\n%\nCrucially, this distortion persists even with token merging.\n%\nTheoretically, this collapse is attributed to how the attention logit is aggregated.\n%\nIn practice, the attention logit for a given region equals the sum of exponentiated logits over all tokens in that region.\n%\nHowever, existing token reduction methods approximate this sum with a single centroid logit, thereby systematically underestimating the accumulated attention logit of visual tokens and leading to the collapse.\n\n\\input{images_tex/motivation.tex}\nMotivated by these observations, we propose \\textbf{ERA}, an \\emph{\\textbf{E}ntropy-guided visual token pruning framework with \\textbf{R}ectified \\textbf{A}ttention} for efficient MLLM inference.\n%\nSpecifically, ERA comprises three key components: \\textbf{Dual-view Entropy Pruning (DEP)}, \\textbf{Bias-aware Token Recycling (BTR)}, and \\textbf{Logit-preserving Attention Rectification (LAR)}.\n%\nFirst, DEP identifies representative anchor tokens in a unified space that jointly models visual diversity and head-wise saliency, enabling the retained tokens to cover both complementary visual patterns and head-specific evidence.\n%\nSecond, BTR recycles pruned tokens into their corresponding anchors and estimates a cluster-level logit bias, preserving discarded visual evidence while recording its accumulated contribution to attention.\n%\nThird, LAR injects the estimated bias into attention logits, rectifying the collapse induced by token reduction.\n%\nThis keeps the attention computed on reduced tokens consistent with the original distribution.\n%\nCrucially, LAR admits a kernel-friendly realization via matrix augmentation and remains compatible with optimized attention implementations such as FlashAttention~\\cite{dao2022flashattention}.\n%\nTo validate the effectiveness of ERA, we conduct extensive experiments across single-image, multi-image and video settings, covering representative MLLMs with different visual-token generation paradigms.\n%\nBeyond standard benchmark evaluation, we further assess ERA in a practical vLLM~\\cite{kwon2023efficient} serving environment to verify the transferability of its efficiency gains to real-world deployment.\n%\nAcross these settings, ERA remains robustness under aggressive token reduction while delivering consistent acceleration benefits.\n\nIn summary, our contributions are as follows:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item We reveal two observations for training-free visual token reduction methods in MLLMs.\n The head-wise attention entropy provides an effective criterion for identifying tokens that are salient to specific attention heads. \n More importantly, we identify a previously overlooked phenomenon, termed \\emph{Attention Logit Collapse}, in which existing methods systematically underestimate the accumulated attention logit of visual tokens through cluster-based approximation.\n \\item We propose ERA, an entropy-guided visual token pruning framework with rectified attention for efficient MLLM inference.\n %\n It first uses Dual-view Entropy Pruning (DEP) to select anchors with both diversity and saliency.\n Then, Bias-aware Token Recycling (BTR) recycles pruned tokens while estimating a cluster-level logit bias.\n %\n Finally, Logit-preserving Attention Rectification (LAR) injects the estimated bias to restore the compressed attention distribution.\n \\item We conduct extensive experiments across single-image, multi-image and video settings on representative MLLMs with different visual-token generation paradigms.\n %\n The results show that ERA remains robustness under aggressive token reduction while delivering inference gains in FLOPs, latency, prefill speed and cache usage, including deployment-oriented improvements with vLLM.\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/method.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Method}\n\\label{sec:method}\n\\input{images_tex/overall.tex}\nWe propose ERA, an entropy-guided token pruning framework with rectified attention for efficient MLLM inference.\n%\nAs illustrated in \\erahighlight{Fig.~\\ref{fig:overall}}, ERA comprises three synergistic components:\n%\n\\noindent(1) \\textbf{Dual-view Entropy Pruning} (\\erahighlight{\\S\\ref{ssec:sampling}}) identifies a robust anchor set by balancing visual diversity with saliency derived from head-wise attention entropy.\n%\n\\noindent(2) \\textbf{Bias-aware Token Recycling} (\\erahighlight{\\S\\ref{ssec:recycling}}) aggregates pruned tokens into their nearest anchors to form recycled representations and estimates an effective bias for each cluster.\n%\n\\noindent(3) \\textbf{Logit-preserving Attention Rectification} (\\erahighlight{\\S\\ref{ssec:rectification}}) injects the estimated bias into attention logits, ensuring that the LLM's interaction with the reduced tokens remains consistent with the original distribution.\n%\nDetails are described as follows.\n\\subsection{Dual-view Entropy Pruning}\n\\label{ssec:sampling}\nEffective token pruning benefits from anchor tokens that can preserve visual diversity and capture attentive information.\n%\nRelying solely on visual diversity may include irrelevant background~\\cite{zhang2025beyond}, while relying solely on attention may result in redundancy~\\cite{tong2025flowcut}.\n%\nTo address this issue, we introduce Dual-view Entropy Pruning (DEP), which operates in a unified space that couples visual appearance with head-wise saliency for robust anchor selection.\n%\nAs shown in \\erahighlight{Fig.~\\ref{fig:overall} (a)}, given an input image $\\mathbf{I}$, the vision encoder $F_v$ produces visual tokens $\\mathbf{X} \\in \\mathbb{R}^{N \\times D}$.\n%\nHere, $N$ is the number of visual tokens and $D$ is the embedding dimension.\n%\nMeanwhile, we extract the attention map $\\mathbf{A} \\in \\mathbb{R}^{H \\times N}$ from the vision encoder's CLS token over $H$ heads.\n%\nThen, we define the head saliency map $\\mathbf{Y} \\in \\mathbb{R}^{N \\times H}$ for each token via a softmax operation with the following equation:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\mathbf{y}_i = \\text{Softmax}(\\mathbf{A}^\\top[i, :]).\n\\end{equation}\n%\nHere, $\\mathbf{y}_i \\in \\mathbb{R}^{H}$ captures how token $i$ distributes its importance across different attention heads.\n%\nWe then compute the entropy $\\mathbf{E}$ of this distribution to quantify the token saliency:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\mathbf{e}_i = -\\sum_{h=1}^{H} \\mathbf{y}_{i,h} \\log (\\mathbf{y}_{i,h} + \\epsilon).\n\\end{equation}\n%\nHere, $\\epsilon$ is a small constant for numerical stability.\n%\nNext, we perform a dual-view combination by concatenating the visual token $\\mathbf{x}_i$ with the saliency feature $\\mathbf{y}_i$, followed by $\\ell_2$ normalization to obtain $\\mathbf{z}_{i} \\in \\mathbb{R}^{D+H}$ as follows:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\mathbf{z}_i =\n \\frac{\\text{Concat}\\left( \\mathbf{x}_i, \\alpha \\mathbf{y}_i \\right)}\n {\\left\\| \\text{Concat}\\left( \\mathbf{x}_i, \\alpha \\mathbf{y}_i \\right) \\right\\|_2},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\alpha$ balances these two views.\n%\nUsing this representation, we adopt an entropy-penalized greedy search to construct an anchor set $S$ that balances diversity and saliency, as illustrated in \\erahighlight{Alg.~\\ref{alg:sampling}}.\n%\nSpecifically, we initialize $S$ with the minimum-entropy token as the starting anchor.\n%\nAt each step, we select the candidate that is farthest from the current anchors in the dual-view space, while penalizing high-entropy tokens with a factor $\\eta$ with the following equation:\n\\begin{equation}\n j^* = \\arg\\max_{j \\notin S}\\left(-\\max_{i \\in S} \\mathbf{z}_j^\\top \\mathbf{z}_i - \\eta \\mathbf{e}_j\\right).\n\\end{equation}\nThe similarity term promotes the coverage of complementary visual patterns and saliency distributions, while the entropy penalty suppresses tokens whose head-wise importance is diffuse.\n%\nWe repeat the above update until reaching the target anchor size $K$.\n%\nAfter selection, we obtain the anchor indices $S$ and define the pruned indices as its complement $U = \\{1,\\ldots,N\\} \\setminus S$.\n%\nNext, we recycle tokens in $U$ by merging them into their nearest anchors in $S$ to preserve information as described in the following section.\n\\subsection{Bias-aware Token Recycling}\n\\label{ssec:recycling}\nAnchor selection is insufficient for effective token reduction, as naively discarding pruned tokens inevitably leads to information loss.\n%\nTo address this issue, we propose Bias-aware Token Recycling (BTR), which recycles pruned tokens into anchors while explicitly estimating the accumulated logit bias of each cluster for subsequent attention rectification.\n%\n\\noindent\\textbf{Anchor Matching and Cluster Formation.}\nAs shown in \\erahighlight{Fig.~\\ref{fig:overall} (b)}, given the anchor set $S$ and the pruned set $U$, we assign each pruned token to its nearest anchor based on the similarity of visual features.\n%\nSpecifically, for each $u \\in U$, we identify its matched anchor with the following equation:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\phi(u) = \\arg\\max_{s \\in S} \\left( \\mathbf{x}_u^\\top \\mathbf{x}_s \\right).\n\\end{equation}\n%\nThis induces a set of clusters $\\{C_k\\}_{k \\in S}$, where each cluster contains one anchor and its associated pruned tokens:\n\\begin{equation}\n C_k = \\{k\\} \\cup \\{u \\in U \\mid \\phi(u) = k\\}.\n\\end{equation}\n\\noindent\\textbf{Centroid Update.}\nAfter clustering, we compress each cluster into a single recycled token by updating the anchor representation.\n%\nTo preserve semantic information, the token recycling is performed in the embedding space as follows:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\mathbf{x}_k^{\\prime} = \\frac{1}{|C_k|} \\sum_{i \\in C_k} \\mathbf{x}_i .\n\\end{equation}\n%\nThis produces a recycled token sequence $\\mathbf{X}' = \\{\\mathbf{x}_k'\\}_{k \\in S}$ that semantically approximates the full visual token set.\n\\begin{algorithm}[t]\n\\caption{Entropy-penalized Greedy Search}\n\\label{alg:sampling}\n\\begin{algorithmic}[1]\n\\STATE \\textbf{Input:} Dual-view representation $\\mathbf{Z} \\in \\mathbb{R}^{N \\times (D+H)}$, Entropy $\\mathbf{E} \\in \\mathbb{R}^{N}$, Balance factor $\\eta$, Target size $K$\n\\STATE \\textbf{Output:} Anchor indices $S$\n\\STATE Compute similarity matrix $\\mathbf{C} \\leftarrow \\mathbf{Z}\\mathbf{Z}^\\top$\n\\STATE Initialize $s_0 \\leftarrow \\arg\\min_i \\mathbf{e}_i$; $S \\leftarrow \\{s_0\\}$\n\\STATE Initialize cache $\\mathbf{m} \\leftarrow \\mathbf{C}[:, s_0]$\n\\WHILE{$|S| < K$}\n \\STATE Select anchor: $j^* \\leftarrow \\arg\\max_{j \\notin S}\\left(-\\mathbf{m}_j - \\eta\\,\\mathbf{e}_j\\right)$\n \\STATE Update $S \\leftarrow S \\cup \\{j^*\\}$\n \\STATE Update cache: $\\mathbf{m} \\leftarrow \\max\\big(\\mathbf{m}, \\mathbf{C}[:, j^*]\\big)$\n\\ENDWHILE\n\\STATE \\textbf{return} $S$\n\\end{algorithmic}\n\\end{algorithm}\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{Bias Estimation.}\nTo estimate the attention logit bias accumulated by each cluster, we first normalize the entropy of each pruned token within the current visual sequence and convert it into a bounded saliency score as follows:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\bar{\\mathbf{e}}_u =\n \\frac{\\mathbf{e}_u - \\min_i \\mathbf{e}_i}\n {\\max_i \\mathbf{e}_i - \\min_i \\mathbf{e}_i + \\epsilon},\n \\quad\n \\mathbf{s}_u = 1 - \\bar{\\mathbf{e}}_u .\n\\end{equation}\nHere, $\\mathbf{s}_u \\in [0,1]$ and a lower entropy indicates a higher saliency.\n%\nWe then convert the saliency into a bias weight for aggregating the contribution of each pruned token with the mapping function as follows:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\mathbf{w}_u = \\lambda + (1-\\lambda)\\mathbf{s}_u,\n \\quad \\lambda \\in [0,1].\n \\label{eq:bias_weight}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nFinally, the estimated attention logit bias associated with each recycled token is obtained by accumulating the weights from its assigned tokens with the following equation:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\mathbf{b}_k = 1 + \\sum_{u \\in C_k \\setminus \\{k\\}} \\mathbf{w}_u .\n \\label{eq:cluster_bias}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nHere, the constant term accounts for the anchor itself, while the summation indicates the bias accumulated from pruned tokens.\n%\nThe recycled tokens $\\mathbf{X}'$ and their associated bias $\\mathbf{B}=\\{\\mathbf{b}_k\\}_{k\\in S}$ jointly encode the semantic content and the logit bias.\n%\nIn the next stage, this information serves as the input to attention rectification, enabling efficient inference while preserving the original attention distribution.\n%\n\\subsection{Logit-preserving Attention Rectification}\n\\label{ssec:rectification}\nThe standard dot-product attention mechanism assigns each token a logit, and the subsequent softmax is determined by the exponentiated logit.\n%\nAfter token merging, a single centroid logit no longer captures the accumulated exponentiated logit of all cluster members, causing a mismatch between the reduced and original attention distribution.\n%\nAs shown in \\erahighlight{Fig.~\\ref{fig:motivation} (b)}, we refer to this phenomenon as \\emph{Attention Logit Collapse}.\n%\nTo address this issue, we propose Logit-preserving Attention Rectification (LAR), which injects a log-bias term into the attention logit to rectify the collapse and preserve the original distribution.\n%\nAs illustrated in \\erahighlight{Fig.~\\ref{fig:overall} (c)}, the ideal exponentiated logit assigned to the cluster $C_k$ in the original sequence at a given LLM layer $F_l$ can be represented as follows:\n\\begin{equation}\n P_k^{\\text{ideal}}\n = \\sum_{i \\in C_k} \\exp\\left( \\frac{\\mathbf{q}^\\top \\mathbf{k}_i}{\\sqrt{d}} \\right).\n\\end{equation}\nSince each cluster is formed by assigning pruned tokens to their nearest anchors according to the feature similarity in \\erahighlight{Sec.~\\ref{ssec:recycling}}, it is naturally expected that tokens within the same cluster exhibit a local feature coherence.\n%\nUnder this assumption (i.e., $\\mathbf{k}_i \\approx \\mathbf{k}_k'$ for $i \\in C_k$), we could approximate the sum by scaling the centroid contribution as follows:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\resizebox{0.87\\linewidth}{!}{$P_k^{\\text{ideal}} \\approx \\sum_{i \\in C_k} \\exp\\left( \\frac{\\mathbf{q}^\\top \\mathbf{k}_k^{\\prime}}{\\sqrt{d}} \\right)\n = |C_k| \\cdot \\exp\\left( \\frac{\\mathbf{q}^\\top \\mathbf{k}_k^{\\prime}}{\\sqrt{d}} \\right)\n $}.\n\\end{equation}\nHowever, the raw count $|C_k|$ assumes a uniform contribution from all tokens, which contradicts the saliency observations in \\erahighlight{Sec.~\\ref{ssec:recycling}}.\n%\nTo account for varying token saliency, we replace $|C_k|$ with the attention logit bias $\\mathbf{b}_k$.\n%\nThen, we can rectify the attention logit on the reduced sequence:\n\\begin{equation}\n P_k^{\\text{rectified}}\n = \\mathbf{b}_k \\cdot \\exp\\left( \\frac{\\mathbf{q}^\\top \\mathbf{k}_k^{\\prime}}{\\sqrt{d}} \\right).\n\\end{equation}\nEquivalently, scaling the exponentiated logit by $\\mathbf{b}_k$ can be realized by adding a log-bias term to the corresponding attention logit with the following equation:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\log P_k^{\\text{rectified}}\n =\n \\frac{\\mathbf{q}^\\top \\mathbf{k}_k^{\\prime}}{\\sqrt{d}}\n +\n \\underbrace{\\log \\mathbf{b}_k}_{\\text{Log-bias Term}}.\n \\label{eq:lar_log_bias}\n\\end{equation}\nWith the above formulation, LAR ensures that the logit on the reduced token set $\\mathbf{X}'$ reflects the contributions of all original tokens.\n%\nMeanwhile, to maintain the compatibility with optimized attention kernels~\\cite{dao2022flashattention}, we propose a Hardware-aware Implementation (HI) that injects the log-bias term without modifying the kernel.\n%\nAs shown in \\erahighlight{Fig.~\\ref{fig:overall} (d)}, we append one auxiliary dimension to the queries, keys, and values, carrying a constant query term, the scaled log-bias and a zero value term with the following equations:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\tilde{\\mathbf{Q}} = [\\mathbf{Q}, \\mathbf{1}], \\quad\n \\tilde{\\mathbf{K}} = [\\mathbf{K}, \\sqrt{d}\\mathbf{B}_{\\log}], \\quad\n \\tilde{\\mathbf{V}} = [\\mathbf{V}, \\mathbf{0}],\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mathbf{B}_{\\log}$ stores the element-wise $\\log \\mathbf{b}_k$.\n%\nThen, the dot-product logit naturally incorporates the bias as follows:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\resizebox{0.80\\linewidth}{!}{$\n \\frac{\\tilde{\\mathbf{Q}}\\tilde{\\mathbf{K}}^\\top}{\\sqrt{d}}\n =\n \\frac{\\mathbf{Q}\\mathbf{K}^\\top + \\mathbf{1}(\\sqrt{d}\\mathbf{B}_{\\log})^\\top}{\\sqrt{d}}\n =\n \\frac{\\mathbf{Q}\\mathbf{K}^\\top}{\\sqrt{d}} + \\mathbf{B}_{\\log}.\n $}\n\\end{equation}\nFinally, after the attention operation, we discard the auxiliary padding, allowing LAR to implement the desired log-bias without changing the outputs.\n%\nIn this way, LAR enables MLLMs to operate on the reduced sequence while preserving the original distribution for improved performance.\n\\\\\n\\noindent\\textbf{Theoretical Justification.}\nThe above implementation explains how LAR injects the bias without modifying attention kernels.\n%\nWe now provide a theoretical derivation of the phenomenon we term \\emph{Attention Logit Collapse} and establish a bounded rectification guarantee for LAR.\n%\nSpecifically, for a cluster $C_k$ with $m=|C_k|$, let $\\mathbf{k}_i$ denote the original key of token $i$.\n%\nWe consider the local centroid model $\\mathbf{k}_k'=\\frac{1}{m}\\sum_{i \\in C_k}\\mathbf{k}_i$, which matches the recycled representation when tokens in the cluster are locally coherent.\n%\nGiven a query $\\mathbf{q}$ and head dimension $d$, we can get the ideal attention logit in the original sequence and the naive attention logit after centroid update with the following equations:\n\\begin{equation}\n P_k^{\\text{ideal}}\n =\n \\sum_{i \\in C_k}\n \\exp\\!\\left(\\frac{\\mathbf{q}^{\\top}\\mathbf{k}_i}{\\sqrt{d}}\\right),\n \\quad\n P_k^{\\text{naive}}\n =\n \\exp\\!\\left(\\frac{\\mathbf{q}^{\\top}\\mathbf{k}_k'}{\\sqrt{d}}\\right).\n \\label{eq:ideal_naive_logit}\n\\end{equation}\nHere, $P_k^{\\text{ideal}}$ accumulates the contributions of original tokens in the cluster, whereas $P_k^{\\text{naive}}$ keeps the centroid contribution.\n%\nSince $\\exp(\\cdot)$ is convex, Jensen's inequality~\\cite{jensen1906fonctions} gives:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{aligned}\n P_k^{\\text{naive}}\n & =\n \\exp\\!\\left(\n \\frac{1}{m}\\sum_{i \\in C_k}\n \\frac{\\mathbf{q}^{\\top}\\mathbf{k}_i}{\\sqrt{d}}\n \\right)\n \\leq\n \\frac{1}{m}P_k^{\\text{ideal}}, \\\\\n \\frac{P_k^{\\text{ideal}}}{P_k^{\\text{naive}}}\n &\\geq m\n \\quad\\Rightarrow\\quad\n \\text{\\emph{Attention Logit Collapse}}.\n\\end{aligned}\n \\label{eq:jensen_collapse}\n\\end{equation}\nThus, centroid replacement underestimates the cluster-level logit by at least a factor of $m$.\n%\nTherefore, visual evidence across multiple tokens collapses into a single logit after merging.\n%\nThe cluster size is also a natural first-order target for rectification.\n%\nLet $\\boldsymbol{\\delta}_i=\\mathbf{k}_i-\\mathbf{k}_k'$ and assume $\\|\\boldsymbol{\\delta}_i\\|_2\\leq \\varepsilon$ for all $i \\in C_k$.\n%\nSince $\\mathbf{k}_k'$ is the centroid of the keys in $C_k$, the residuals satisfy $\\sum_{i \\in C_k}\\boldsymbol{\\delta}_i=\\mathbf{0}$.\n%\nThus, we have the following equation:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\frac{P_k^{\\text{ideal}}}{P_k^{\\text{naive}}}\n =\n \\sum_{i \\in C_k}\n \\exp\\!\\left(\n \\frac{\\mathbf{q}^{\\top}\\boldsymbol{\\delta}_i}{\\sqrt{d}}\n \\right).\n \\label{eq:ratio_residual}\n\\end{equation}\nA Taylor expansion around zero cancels the first-order term after summing over the cluster.\n%\nWith $\\rho=\\|\\mathbf{q}\\|_2\\varepsilon/\\sqrt{d}$, the remaining error is bounded with the second-order term:\n\\begin{equation}\n 0\n \\leq\n \\frac{P_k^{\\text{ideal}}}{P_k^{\\text{naive}}}\n -\n m\n \\leq\n \\frac{1}{2}m e^{\\rho}\\rho^2\n =\n \\mathcal{O}\\!\\left(\n \\frac{m\\|\\mathbf{q}\\|_2^2\\varepsilon^2}{d}\n \\right).\n \\label{eq:second_order_bound}\n\\end{equation}\nTherefore, the true multiplicative rectification is close to the cluster size, with only a second-order residual.\n%\nHowever, directly using the raw count $m$ treats all merged tokens as equally important.\n%\nERA instead uses the saliency-aware bias $\\mathbf{b}_k$ in Eq.~\\eqref{eq:cluster_bias}.\n%\nFrom Eq.~\\eqref{eq:bias_weight}, each pruned-token weight satisfies $0\\leq \\mathbf{w}_u\\leq 1$, and thus $\\mathbf{b}_k$ is bounded between one anchor contribution and the full cluster size.\n%\nCombining this bound with Eq.~\\eqref{eq:jensen_collapse}, we obtain this sandwich formulation:\n\\begin{equation}\n 1\n \\leq\n \\mathbf{b}_k\n \\leq\n m\n \\leq\n \\frac{P_k^{\\text{ideal}}}{P_k^{\\text{naive}}},\n \\qquad\n P_k^{\\text{naive}}\n \\leq\n P_k^{\\text{rectified}}\n \\leq\n P_k^{\\text{ideal}} .\n \\label{eq:lar_sandwich}\n\\end{equation}\nThe last inequality follows from $P_k^{\\text{rectified}}=\\mathbf{b}_kP_k^{\\text{naive}}$.\n%\nThis sandwich property shows that LAR moves the compressed attention logit toward the original one while avoiding over-amplification.\n%\nFor highly salient clusters, $\\mathbf{b}_k$ approaches $m$, providing a near-full compensation for the collapsed attention.\n%\nFor heterogeneous clusters with less relevant tokens, $\\mathbf{b}_k$ stays below $m$, yielding a conservative rectification that reflects token saliency rather than blindly restoring every merged token equally.\n%\nOverall, this derivation connects the three modules of ERA.\n%\nDEP selects anchors that support locally coherent clusters.\n%\nBTR converts entropy-derived saliency into a bounded cluster-level logit bias.\n%\nLAR injects this bias as an additive logit rectification within standard attention.\n%\nThe below experiments verify that this rectification improves both accuracy and efficiency in practice.\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/relatedwork.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Related Work}\n\\label{sec:related_work}\n\\subsection{Multimodal Large Language Models}\nMLLMs enable unified perception and reasoning by connecting visual representations with LLMs through diverse architectural designs~\\cite{baltrusaitis2019multimodal,xu2023multimodal,zhang2024visionlanguage}.\n%\nGiven that the attention computation scales quadratically with sequence length, how visual tokens are represented and injected into LLMs largely dictates inference efficiency.\n%\nAccordingly, current MLLMs can be organized into three categories: \\textit{static projection pipelines}, \\textit{resolution-adaptive strategies} and \\textit{unified architectures}.\n\\\\\n\\textbf{Static Projection Pipelines.}\nThis paradigm bridges a vision encoder with an LLM via a learnable projector, mapping patch-level features into the LLM semantic space.\n%\nLLaVA~\\cite{liu2024improved} and MiniGPT-4~\\cite{zhu2024minigpt} establish this baseline by aligning visual features with language tokens.\n%\nInternVL~\\cite{chen2024internvl} scales this approach to foundation models with stronger encoders.\n%\nDespite their effectiveness, these methods typically employ a static projection for visual tokens, resulting in prohibitive computation costs and memory usage, especially for high-resolution scenarios~\\cite{chen2024image,chen2024longvila} and video inputs~\\cite{li2024llavaonevision}.\n\\\\\n\\textbf{Resolution-Adaptive Strategies.}\nTo mitigate information loss and redundancy caused by fixed-size resizing, some approaches adapt visual tokenization to image resolution and aspect ratio.\n%\nFor example, LLaVA-NeXT~\\cite{liu2024llavanext} and InternLM-XComposer2~\\cite{dong2024internlm} utilize dynamic grid pinning to enhance fine-grained perception capabilities.\n%\nQwen2.5-VL~\\cite{bai2025qwen2} studies dynamic-resolution tokenization to support any-resolution perception.\n%\nWhile improving visual fidelity, these methods may sharply increase visual tokens with high-resolution inputs, amplifying the need for visual token reduction under constrained computational budgets.\n\\\\\n\\textbf{Unified Architectures.}\nDifferent from the modular designs, unified architectures integrate vision and language processing within a single backbone.\n%\nFor example, EVE series~\\cite{diao2024unveiling,diao2025evev2} and the NEO family~\\cite{diao2025pixels,diao2026pixels,diao2026sensenova} process visual and textual tokens as a single sequence, requiring no explicit projectors or vision encoders.\n%\nHowever, they typically process visual tokens without intrinsic token reduction.\n%\nThus, substantial computational redundancy remains, underscoring the need for more advanced visual token reduction methods to improve efficiency in unified MLLMs.\n\\subsection{Visual Token Reduction for MLLMs}\nMany visual tokens introduce substantial computational and memory overhead in MLLMs~\\cite{han2023survey,papa2024efficient}.\n%\nRecently, visual token reduction draws attention for accelerating MLLM inference.\n%\nSpecifically, existing visual token reduction methods can be categorized into three paradigms: \\textit{attention-based pruning}, \\textit{similarity-based pruning} and \\textit{merging-based pruning}.\n\\\\\n\\textbf{Attention-based Pruning.}\nAttention-based pruning estimates token importance from attention distributions or cross-modal interactions.\n%\nFor example, FastV~\\cite{chen2024image} prunes visual tokens of early LLM layers based on attention statistics.\n%\nSparseVLM~\\cite{zhang2024sparsevlm} leverages cross-modal attention to preserve instruction-relevant visual evidence.\n%\nBesides, VTW~\\cite{lin2025boosting} exploits the attention sink phenomenon to withdraw visual tokens in deeper layers of LLMs. \n%\nFitPrune~\\cite{ye2025fit} improves the pruning stability by minimizing the divergence of attention distributions.\n%\nAlthough effective, attention-based methods are often context-dependent and may not be fully compatible with lightweight attention kernels such as FlashAttention~\\cite{dao2022flashattention}, thereby limiting the inference efficiency of MLLMs.\n\\\\\n\\textbf{Similarity-based Pruning.}\nSimilarity-based pruning reduces redundancy by selecting a compact subset of visual tokens according to feature diversity.\n%\nFor example, DART~\\cite{wen2025stop} ranks and selects tokens using diversity-aware scores to retain representative visual content.\n%\nDivPrune~\\cite{alvar2025divprune} emphasizes feature dispersion to reduce redundancy among visual tokens.\n%\nHowever, similarity-based pruning may ignore instruction relevance.\n%\nCDPruner~\\cite{zhang2025beyond} addresses this issue by selecting tokens that are both diverse and relevant to the instruction with a subset selection~\\cite{kulesza2012determinantal}.\n%\nNevertheless, both attention-based and similarity-based pruning discard redundant tokens, resulting in irreversible information loss and motivating token merging as an alternative paradigm.\n\\\\\n\\textbf{Merging-based Pruning.}\nMerging-based pruning reduces redundancy by aggregating or resampling visual tokens into compact representations within MLLMs.\n%\nFor example, BLIP-2~\\cite{li2023blip} uses a Q-Former to distill visual features into a fixed number of query tokens.\n%\nVisionZip~\\cite{yang2025visionzip} merges similar visual tokens to extend the effective context length.\n%\nLLaVA-PruMerge~\\cite{shang2025llava} combines pruning and merging to dynamically adapt the visual token count at inference time.\n%\nWhile effective, merging-based pruning methods commonly overlook the phenomenon of \\emph{Attention Logit Collapse}, leading to information loss during token reduction.\n%\nIn contrast, our proposed framework explicitly preserves attention logits via entropy-guided pruning and attention rectification, achieving superior trade-offs between efficiency and accuracy.\n\n================================================\nFILE: tables/LLAVA_ALL.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{\n Single-image comparison under \\textbf{extreme compression} ($\\sim$5\\% tokens retained) with \\textbf{LLaVA-1.5} and \\textbf{LLaVA-NeXT} backbones. \\textbf{Avg.} denotes retained performance relative to each full-token upper bound. Best and second-best pruned results are shown in \\textbf{bold} and \\underline{underlined}, respectively.\n }\n \\resizebox{0.945\\textwidth}{!}{\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{6.5pt}\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{0.991}\n \\begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Method} & \\textbf{VQA$^{\\text{v2}}$} & \\textbf{GQA} & \\textbf{SQA$^{\\text{I}}$} &\n \\textbf{VQA$^{\\text{T}}$} & \\textbf{POPE} & \\textbf{MME} &\n \\textbf{MMB$^{\\text{E}}$} & \\textbf{MMB$^{\\text{C}}$} &\n \\textbf{MMVet} & \\textbf{Avg. (\\%)} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= LLaVA-1.5-7B =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{11}{c}{\\textsc{LLaVA-1.5-7B: Upper Bound: 576 Tokens (100\\%)}} \\\\\n LLaVA-1.5-7B & 78.5 & 61.9 & 69.5 & 58.2 & 85.9 & 1506.5 & 64.7 & 58.1 & 31.3 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{11}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 32 Tokens} ($\\downarrow$ 94.4\\%)} \\\\\n PruMerge+\\pub{(ICCV25)\\cite{shang2025llava}}& 65.6 & 52.9 & 67.9 & 49.2 & 66.7 & 1236.6 & 55.1 & 45.9 & 24.7 & 83.8\\% \\\\\n TRIM\\pub{(COLING25)\\cite{song2024trim}} & 68.6 & 54.5 & 68.1 & 47.6 & 84.9 & 1251.8 & 57.7 & 40.1 & 20.5 & 84.5\\% \\\\\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 67.1 & 51.8 & 69.1 & 53.1 & 69.4 & 1251.2 & 57.0 & 50.3 & 25.3 & 86.6\\% \\\\\n DART\\pub{(EMNLP25)\\cite{wen2025stop}} & 67.1 & 52.9 & \\underline{69.3} & 52.2 & 69.1 & 1273.3 & 58.5 & 50.0 & 25.0 & 86.9\\% \\\\\n DivPrune\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{alvar2025divprune}} & 71.2 & 54.9 & 68.6 & 52.9 & 81.5 & 1284.9 & 57.6 & 49.1 & 26.3 & 89.6\\% \\\\\n CDPruner\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{zhang2025beyond}} & \\underline{73.6} & \\textbf{57.0} & \\textbf{69.5} & 53.2 & \\textbf{87.9} & \\textbf{1373.0} & 59.6 & 49.6 & \\underline{27.8} & \\underline{93.1\\%} \\\\\n AgilePrune\\pub{(ICLR26)\\cite{baek2026agilepruner}} & \\textbf{74.0} & 54.1 & 69.0 & \\underline{54.5} & 80.1 & 1297.3 & \\underline{60.4} & \\textbf{53.6} & - & 92.4\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\textbf{Ours} & \\underline{73.6} & \\underline{56.9} & 69.1 & \\textbf{54.6} & \\underline{85.6} & \\underline{1312.6} & \\textbf{60.9} & \\underline{52.1} & \\textbf{28.5} & \\textbf{93.4\\%} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= LLaVA-1.5-13B =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{11}{c}{\\textsc{LLaVA-1.5-13B: Upper Bound: 576 Tokens (100\\%)}} \\\\\n LLaVA-1.5-13B & 80.0 & 63.3 & 72.8 & 61.2 & 86.0 & 1531.2 & 68.5 & 63.5 & 36.2 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{11}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 32 Tokens} ($\\downarrow$ 94.4\\%)} \\\\\n PruMerge+\\pub{(ICCV25)\\cite{shang2025llava}}& 66.8 & 54.1 & 71.7 & 52.4 & 67.4 & 1269.1 & 61.1 & 53.5 & 28.7 & 85.2\\% \\\\\n TRIM\\pub{(COLING25)\\cite{song2024trim}} & 69.8 & 55.6 & 70.4 & 49.6 & \\underline{85.8} & 1284.7 & 63.1 & 45.4 & 26.4 & 85.9\\% \\\\\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 68.4 & 52.7 & \\underline{72.9} & 55.2 & 66.8 & 1257.7 & 61.2 & 55.8 & 29.3 & 86.3\\% \\\\\n DART\\pub{(EMNLP25)\\cite{wen2025stop}} & 68.1 & 53.9 & \\textbf{73.2} & 55.1 & 66.9 & 1282.8 & 61.9 & 56.2 & 29.4 & 86.9\\% \\\\\n DivPrune\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{alvar2025divprune}} & 72.0 & 56.2 & 70.9 & 54.6 & 79.3 & 1405.2 & 61.7 & \\underline{57.2} & 27.8 & 89.6\\% \\\\\n CDPruner\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{zhang2025beyond}} & \\underline{75.2} & \\textbf{58.5} & 71.9 & \\underline{55.3} & \\textbf{87.6} & \\underline{1421.0} & \\underline{63.7} & 56.6 & \\underline{30.9} & \\underline{93.0\\%} \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\textbf{Ours} & \\textbf{75.4} & \\underline{58.4} & 71.8 & \\textbf{55.9} & 85.1 & \\textbf{1461.4} & \\textbf{65.8} & \\textbf{59.4} & \\textbf{32.6} & \\textbf{94.5\\%} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= LLaVA-NeXT-7B =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{11}{c}{\\textsc{LLaVA-NeXT-7B: Upper Bound: 2880 Tokens (100\\%)}} \\\\\n LLaVA-NeXT-7B & 81.3 & 62.5 & 67.5 & 60.3 & 86.8 & 1511.8 & 65.8 & 57.3 & 40.0 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{11}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 160 Tokens} ($\\downarrow$ 94.4\\%)} \\\\\n PruMerge+\\pub{(ICCV25)\\cite{shang2025llava}}& 70.5 & 56.2 & 66.9 & 50.3 & 71.1 & 1289.6 & 58.0 & 48.9 & 29.3 & 85.9\\% \\\\\n TRIM\\pub{(COLING25)\\cite{song2024trim}} & 71.0 & 57.4 & 65.5 & 45.8 & 84.8 & 1275.8 & 61.6 & 45.2 & 29.6 & 86.7\\% \\\\\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 71.4 & 55.2 & \\underline{67.9} & \\underline{55.0} & 74.9 & 1327.8 & 58.6 & 50.4 & 32.3 & 88.9\\% \\\\\n DART\\pub{(EMNLP25)\\cite{wen2025stop}} & 72.5 & 56.8 & 67.8 & 54.9 & 75.3 & 1325.4 & 62.0 & 53.6 & 32.2 & 90.5\\% \\\\\n DivPrune\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{alvar2025divprune}} & 75.0 & 59.3 & 67.1 & 54.1 & 80.0 & 1356.6 & 62.9 & 53.7 & 32.0 & 91.9\\% \\\\\n CDPruner\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{zhang2025beyond}} & \\underline{76.7} & \\textbf{60.8} & 67.5 & \\textbf{55.4} & \\textbf{86.8} & \\textbf{1425.3} & \\underline{64.2} & 53.8 & \\textbf{36.2} & 95.5\\% \\\\\n ZOO-Prune\\pub{(CVPR26)\\cite{kim2026zooprune}} & 76.1 & 59.9 & \\textbf{68.4} & \\textbf{55.4} & 83.1 & 1417.0 & \\underline{64.2} & \\underline{54.4} & - & \\underline{95.6\\%} \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\textbf{Ours} & \\textbf{77.3} & \\underline{60.4} & \\underline{67.9} & \\underline{55.0} & \\underline{85.2} & \\underline{1422.2} & \\textbf{64.5} & \\textbf{57.1} & \\underline{35.5} & \\textbf{95.8\\%} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= LLaVA-NeXT-13B =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{11}{c}{\\textsc{LLaVA-NeXT-13B: Upper Bound: 2880 Tokens (100\\%)}} \\\\\n LLaVA-NeXT-13B & 82.3 & 64.4 & 73.1 & 63.2 & 85.3 & 1539.5 & 68.5 & 61.2 & 45.0 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{11}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 160 Tokens} ($\\downarrow$ 94.4\\%)} \\\\\n PruMerge+\\pub{(ICCV25)\\cite{shang2025llava}}& 71.6 & 57.9 & 70.1 & 52.8 & 72.1 & 1345.9 & 63.2 & 57.1 & 30.6 & 86.9\\% \\\\\n TRIM\\pub{(COLING25)\\cite{song2024trim}} & 72.1 & 58.9 & 69.1 & 49.2 & \\underline{87.0} & 1392.3 & 65.7 & 51.6 & 27.8 & 87.3\\% \\\\\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 72.4 & 57.8 & 69.7 & \\textbf{58.6} & 76.8 & 1393.9 & 64.8 & 60.0 & 35.9 & 91.0\\% \\\\\n DART\\pub{(EMNLP25)\\cite{wen2025stop}} & 72.8 & 58.7 & 70.1 & \\underline{57.2} & 75.7 & 1389.3 & 64.6 & 60.8 & 35.0 & 90.7\\% \\\\\n DivPrune\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{alvar2025divprune}} & 75.6 & 60.0 & 71.4 & 56.3 & 81.9 & 1436.7 & 65.1 & \\underline{60.9} & 37.4 & 93.2\\% \\\\\n CDPruner\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{zhang2025beyond}} & \\textbf{77.8} & \\textbf{62.2} & \\underline{71.7} & 56.7 & \\textbf{88.3} & \\underline{1476.9} & \\underline{65.9} & 60.1 & \\textbf{40.4} & \\textbf{95.8\\%} \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\textbf{Ours} & \\underline{77.3} & \\textbf{62.2} & \\textbf{72.3} & 56.3 & 82.6 & \\textbf{1524.2} & \\textbf{67.5} & \\textbf{61.2} & \\underline{37.8} & \\underline{95.2\\%} \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n \\label{tab:extreme_pruning_combined_all}\n\\end{table*}\n\n================================================\nFILE: tables/extra_cls_free_common.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{table}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{\n CLS-free average-readout ablation on representative large-scale benchmarks. $\\Delta$ rows report normalized changes.\n }\n \\label{tab:extra_cls_free_common}\n \\resizebox{\\linewidth}{!}{\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3.8pt}\n \\footnotesize\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{0.98}\n \\begin{tabular}{@{}clccccc@{}}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Budget} & \\textbf{Readout} & \\textbf{GQA} & \\textbf{SQA$^{\\text{I}}$} & \\textbf{VQA$^{\\text{T}}$} & \\textbf{POPE} & \\textbf{Avg. (\\%)} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{7}{c}{\\textsc{LLaVA-1.5-7B}} \\\\\n Full model & Baseline & 61.9 & 69.5 & 58.2 & 85.9 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\multirow{3}{*}{Retain 64} & ERA-CLS & 58.5 & 68.8 & 55.9 & 87.0 & \\textbf{97.7\\%} \\\\\n & ERA-Avg & 58.3 & 68.2 & 55.5 & 87.4 & 97.4\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n & $\\Delta$ & -0.3\\% & -0.9\\% & -0.7\\% & +0.5\\% & -0.3\\% \\\\\n \\multirow{3}{*}{Retain 32} & ERA-CLS & 56.9 & 69.1 & 54.6 & 85.6 & \\textbf{96.2\\%} \\\\\n & ERA-Avg & 57.0 & 67.9 & 53.8 & 86.5 & 95.7\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n & $\\Delta$ & +0.2\\% & -1.7\\% & -1.4\\% & +1.0\\% & -0.5\\% \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{7}{c}{\\textsc{LLaVA-NeXT-7B}} \\\\\n Full model & Baseline & 62.5 & 67.5 & 60.3 & 86.8 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\multirow{3}{*}{Retain 320} & ERA-CLS & 61.7 & 67.9 & 56.5 & 86.9 & 98.3\\% \\\\\n & ERA-Avg & 61.8 & 68.4 & 56.3 & 86.7 & \\textbf{98.4\\%} \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n & $\\Delta$ & +0.2\\% & +0.7\\% & -0.3\\% & -0.2\\% & +0.1\\% \\\\\n \\multirow{3}{*}{Retain 160} & ERA-CLS & 60.4 & 67.9 & 55.0 & 85.2 & \\textbf{96.7\\%} \\\\\n & ERA-Avg & 60.7 & 67.8 & 54.8 & 83.9 & 96.3\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n & $\\Delta$ & +0.5\\% & -0.1\\% & -0.3\\% & -1.5\\% & -0.4\\% \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n\\end{table}\n\n================================================\nFILE: tables/extra_internvl3.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{table}[t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{\n Image-domain comparison with \\textbf{InternVL3-8B}.\n }\n \\label{tab:extra_internvl3}\n \n \\resizebox{0.489\\textwidth}{!}{ \n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{2.5pt} \n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.05} \n \n \\begin{tabular}{lcccccccc}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Method} & \\textbf{VQA$^{\\text{T}}$} & \\textbf{MME} & \\textbf{POPE} & \\textbf{GQA} & \\textbf{MMB$^{\\text{E}}$} & \\textbf{MMB$^{\\text{C}}$} & \\textbf{Avg. (\\%)} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \n % ================= UPPER BOUND =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{8}{c}{\\textsc{Upper Bound: 1,280 Tokens (100\\%)}} \\\\\n InternVL3-8B & 81.5 & 2389.7 & 90.3 & 52.0 & 85.9 & 85.4 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\midrule\n \n % ================= 256 TOKENS =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{8}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 256 Tokens} ($\\downarrow$ 80.0\\%)} \\\\\n DivPrune\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{alvar2025divprune}} & \\underline{67.1} & 2188.7 & \\underline{90.1} & 49.0 & 82.0 & 80.8 & 93.0\\% \\\\\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 67.2 & 2192.0 & 88.6 & 47.8 & 82.9 & 81.5 & 92.7\\% \\\\\n DART\\pub{(EMNLP25)\\cite{wen2025stop}} & 62.0 & \\textbf{2280.4} & 88.0 & \\textbf{50.9} & \\textbf{83.2} & \\textbf{83.2} & \\underline{93.5\\%} \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \t\\textbf{Ours} & \\textbf{71.2} & \\underline{2251.7} & \\textbf{89.8} & \\underline{48.7} & \\underline{82.9} & \\underline{83.0} & \\textbf{94.7\\%} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \n % ================= 128 TOKENS =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{8}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 128 Tokens} ($\\downarrow$ 90.0\\%)} \\\\\n DivPrune\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{alvar2025divprune}} & 54.7 & 2043.0 & 87.6 & 47.4 & 78.6 & 78.0 & 87.3\\% \\\\\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 48.3 & 1987.8 & 85.2 & 44.6 & 77.7 & 76.5 & 83.8\\% \\\\\n DART\\pub{(EMNLP25)\\cite{wen2025stop}} & 51.3 & \\textbf{2180.4} & 85.1 & \\textbf{48.9} & \\textbf{80.7} & \\textbf{80.9} & \\underline{88.5\\%} \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \t\\textbf{Ours} & \\textbf{60.8} & \\underline{2119.2} & \\textbf{88.7} & \\underline{47.7} & \\underline{79.6} & \\underline{79.8} & \\textbf{89.9\\%} \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n\\end{table}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: tables/extra_lar_layer_strategy.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{table}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{\n LAR strategy ablation with \\textbf{LLaVA-1.5-7B} and \\textbf{LLaVA-NeXT-7B}.\n }\n \\label{tab:extra_lar_layer_strategy}\n \\resizebox{0.489\\textwidth}{!}{\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4.0pt}\n \\small\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.08}\n \\begin{tabular}{@{}lcccc@{}}\n \\toprule\n \\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{LAR Strategy}} &\n \\multicolumn{1}{c@{}}{\\textbf{LLaVA-1.5-7B}} &\n \\multicolumn{3}{c@{}}{\\textbf{LLaVA-NeXT-7B}} \\\\\n \\cmidrule(l){2-5}\n &\\textbf{VQA$^{\\text{T}}$} & \\textbf{VQA$^{\\text{T}}$} & \\textbf{POPE} & \\textbf{SQA$^{\\text{I}}$} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n Default: uniform all layers & 57.01 & \\textbf{56.50} & \\textbf{86.65} & \\textbf{68.03} \\\\\n Early only: layers 0, 1, and 2 & 57.02 & 56.35 & 86.43 & 67.98 \\\\\n Decayed: linear across layers & \\textbf{57.03} & 56.39 & 86.40 & 68.00 \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n\\end{table}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: tables/extra_lar_overhead.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{table}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{Efficiency and accuracy impact of LAR with \\textbf{LLaVA-NeXT-7B}.}\\label{tab:extra_lar_overhead}\n \\resizebox{\\linewidth}{!}{ \n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4.0pt}\n \\small\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.05}\n \\begin{tabular}{@{}lccc@{}}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Metric} & \\textbf{w/o LAR} & \\textbf{ERA} & \\textbf{Gain} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\textsc{Latency}} \\\\\n E2E Latency (ms) & 135.300 & 134.608 & \\textbf{0.692 ms lower} \\\\\n LLM Prefill (ms) & 92.784 & 92.139 & 0.645 ms lower \\\\\n Decode Total (ms) & 42.516 & 42.469 & 0.047 ms lower \\\\\n Decode Throughput (tok/s) & 32.9 & 33.1 & 0.2 tok/s higher \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\textsc{Resource}} \\\\\n Peak GPU Memory (GB) & 14.633 & 14.633 & \\textbf{unchanged} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\textsc{Accuracy}} \\\\\n GQA Accuracy (\\%) & 59.68 & \\textbf{60.55} & \\textbf{0.87\\% higher} \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n\\end{table}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: tables/extra_llava_video.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{\n Video comparison with \\textbf{LLaVA-OneVision-7B} and \\textbf{LLaVA-Video-7B}. \\textsuperscript{I} denotes image-only pruning transferred to video inputs. Superscripts $\\dagger$ and $\\ddagger$ mark the best results within image-transfer and video-specific methods, respectively.\n }\n \\label{tab:extra_llava_video}\n \\resizebox{0.945\\textwidth}{!}{\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{6.5pt}\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.05}\n \\begin{tabular}{l|cccc|cc|cc}\n \\toprule\n \\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Method}} &\n \\multicolumn{4}{c|}{\\textbf{VideoMME}} &\n \\multirow{2}{*}{\\makecell{\\textbf{LongVideoBench}}} &\n \\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{MVBench}} &\n \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{Avg. Acc.}} \\\\\n \\cmidrule(lr){2-5}\n \\cmidrule(lr){8-9}\n &\n \\textbf{Short} &\n \\textbf{Medium} &\n \\textbf{Long} &\n \\textbf{Overall} &\n &\n &\n \\textbf{Score} &\n \\textbf{\\%} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{9}{c}{\\textsc{LLaVA-OneVision-7B: Upper Bound (100\\% Tokens)}} \\\\\n LLaVA-OneVision-7B & 69.9 & 56.7 & 48.9 & 58.5 & 56.6 & 58.3 & 57.8 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{9}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 25\\% Tokens}} \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n FastV\\pub{(ECCV24)\\cite{chen2024image}} & 68.1 & 54.7 & 46.8 & 56.5 & 55.4 & 56.4 & 56.1 & 97.1\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 68.8 & 57.3$^\\dagger$ & 48.2 & 58.1 & 56.4$^\\dagger$ & 57.8$^\\dagger$ & 57.4$^\\dagger$ & 99.3\\%$^\\dagger$ \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n Ours\\textsuperscript{I} & 71.0$^\\dagger$ & 56.6 & 49.1$^\\dagger$ & 58.9$^\\dagger$ & 55.6 & 57.0 & 57.2 & 99.0\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowgreen}\n PruneVID\\pub{(ACL25)\\cite{huang2024prunevid}} & 67.3 & 54.8 & 47.2 & 56.4 & 55.4 & 56.8 & 56.2 & 97.2\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowgreen}\n FastVID\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{shen2025fastvid}} & 69.9 & 56.3 & 47.4 & 57.9 & 55.9 & 58.1$^\\ddagger$ & 57.3 & 99.1\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowgreen}\n FlashVID\\pub{(ICLR26)\\cite{fan2026flashvid}} & 71.2$^\\ddagger$ & 57.0$^\\ddagger$ & 49.3$^\\ddagger$ & 59.2$^\\ddagger$ & 56.8$^\\ddagger$ & 58.0 & 58.0$^\\ddagger$ & 100.3\\%$^\\ddagger$ \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{9}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 15\\% Tokens}} \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n FastV\\pub{(ECCV24)\\cite{chen2024image}} & 64.6 & 54.0 & 45.3 & 54.6 & 54.8 & 55.0 & 54.8 & 94.8\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 63.8 & 54.6 & 48.3$^\\dagger$ & 55.6 & 54.1 & 53.5 & 54.4 & 94.1\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n Ours\\textsuperscript{I} & 68.3$^\\dagger$ & 56.4$^\\dagger$ & 46.9 & 57.2$^\\dagger$ & 55.0$^\\dagger$ & 56.5$^\\dagger$ & 56.2$^\\dagger$ & 97.3\\%$^\\dagger$ \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowgreen}\n PruneVID\\pub{(ACL25)\\cite{huang2024prunevid}} & 67.2 & 52.8 & 46.7 & 56.1 & 54.5 & 55.1 & 55.2 & 95.6\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowgreen}\n FastVID\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{shen2025fastvid}} & 69.7$^\\ddagger$ & 55.8 & 47.7 & 57.7 & 56.7 & 58.2$^\\ddagger$ & 57.5 & 99.5\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowgreen}\n FlashVID\\pub{(ICLR26)\\cite{fan2026flashvid}} & 69.6 & 56.0$^\\ddagger$ & 48.9$^\\ddagger$ & 58.2$^\\ddagger$ & 57.5$^\\ddagger$ & 57.9 & 57.9$^\\ddagger$ & 100.1\\%$^\\ddagger$ \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{9}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 10\\% Tokens}} \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n FastV\\pub{(ECCV24)\\cite{chen2024image}} & 60.9 & 52.2 & 44.9 & 52.7 & 52.4 & 53.4 & 52.8 & 91.3\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 60.3 & 52.9 & 46.7 & 53.3 & 49.4 & 54.8 & 52.5 & 90.8\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n Ours\\textsuperscript{I} & 66.8$^\\dagger$ & 53.7$^\\dagger$ & 48.1$^\\dagger$ & 56.2$^\\dagger$ & 52.5$^\\dagger$ & 56.0$^\\dagger$ & 54.9$^\\dagger$ & 95.0\\%$^\\dagger$ \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowgreen}\n PruneVID\\pub{(ACL25)\\cite{huang2024prunevid}} & 65.9 & 52.8 & 45.6 & 54.7 & 54.0 & 53.7 & 54.1 & 93.7\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowgreen}\n FastVID\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{shen2025fastvid}} & 68.1$^\\ddagger$ & 55.7 & 47.8 & 57.2 & 55.7 & 57.0 & 56.6 & 98.0\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowgreen}\n FlashVID\\pub{(ICLR26)\\cite{fan2026flashvid}} & 67.3 & 57.1$^\\ddagger$ & 49.0$^\\ddagger$ & 57.8$^\\ddagger$ & 56.5$^\\ddagger$ & 57.4$^\\ddagger$ & 57.2$^\\ddagger$ & 99.0\\%$^\\ddagger$ \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{9}{c}{\\textsc{LLaVA-Video-7B: Upper Bound (100\\% Tokens)}} \\\\\n LLaVA-Video-7B & 77.0 & 62.1 & 53.3 & 64.2 & 59.5 & 61.9 & 61.9 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{9}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 25\\% Tokens}} \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n FastV\\pub{(ECCV24)\\cite{chen2024image}} & 71.7 & 59.2 & 50.9 & 60.6 & 56.4 & 59.1 & 58.7 & 94.8\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 74.0$^\\dagger$ & 60.3$^\\dagger$ & 52.9$^\\dagger$ & 62.4$^\\dagger$ & 58.3 & 60.0 & 60.2 & 97.3\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n Ours\\textsuperscript{I} & 72.3 & 57.0 & 51.6 & 60.3 & 60.2$^\\dagger$ & 60.5$^\\dagger$ & 60.3$^\\dagger$ & 97.5\\%$^\\dagger$ \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowgreen}\n FastVID\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{shen2025fastvid}} & 74.7$^\\ddagger$ & 60.1 & 53.6$^\\ddagger$ & 62.8$^\\ddagger$ & 58.2 & 60.5$^\\ddagger$ & 60.5 & 97.7\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowgreen}\n FlashVID\\pub{(ICLR26)\\cite{fan2026flashvid}} & 74.2 & 61.4$^\\ddagger$ & 51.6 & 62.4 & 59.1$^\\ddagger$ & 60.2 & 60.6$^\\ddagger$ & 97.8\\%$^\\ddagger$ \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{9}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 10\\% Tokens}} \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n FastV\\pub{(ECCV24)\\cite{chen2024image}} & 64.3 & 53.8 & 49.2 & 55.8 & 53.6 & 56.2 & 55.2 & 89.2\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 69.4 & 57.9$^\\dagger$ & 51.2$^\\dagger$ & 59.5$^\\dagger$ & 54.5 & 58.5$^\\dagger$ & 57.5 & 92.9\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n Ours\\textsuperscript{I} & 69.9$^\\dagger$ & 56.8 & 49.4 & 58.7 & 56.4$^\\dagger$ & 57.7 & 57.6$^\\dagger$ & 93.1\\%$^\\dagger$ \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowgreen}\n FastVID\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{shen2025fastvid}} & 71.8 & 57.3 & 50.2 & 59.8 & 56.9 & 59.3$^\\ddagger$ & 58.7 & 94.8\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowgreen}\n FlashVID\\pub{(ICLR26)\\cite{fan2026flashvid}} & 72.2$^\\ddagger$ & 59.1$^\\ddagger$ & 51.2$^\\ddagger$ & 60.9$^\\ddagger$ & 57.7$^\\ddagger$ & 59.3$^\\ddagger$ & 59.3$^\\ddagger$ & 95.8\\%$^\\ddagger$ \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n\\end{table*}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: tables/extra_milebench.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{\n Multi-image comparison on \\textbf{MileBench} with \\textbf{LLaVA-1.5-7B}.\n }\n \\label{tab:extra_milebench}\n \\resizebox{0.945\\textwidth}{!}{\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{6.5pt}\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.05}\n\n \\begin{tabular}{l|cccc|ccccc|cc|cc}\n \\toprule\n \\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Method}} &\n \\multicolumn{4}{c|}{\\textbf{Temporal Multi-image}} &\n \\multicolumn{5}{c|}{\\textbf{Semantic Multi-image}} &\n \\multicolumn{2}{c|}{\\textbf{Diagnostic Retrieval}} &\n \\multicolumn{2}{c}{\\textbf{Average}} \\\\\n \\cmidrule(lr){2-5}\n \\cmidrule(lr){6-10}\n \\cmidrule(lr){11-12}\n \\cmidrule(lr){13-14}\n &\n \\textbf{T-1} & \\textbf{T-2} & \\textbf{T-3} & \\textbf{T-4} &\n \\textbf{S-1} & \\textbf{S-2} & \\textbf{S-3} & \\textbf{S-4} & \\textbf{S-5} &\n \\textbf{NH} & \\textbf{IR} &\n \\textbf{Score} & \\textbf{\\%} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{14}{c}{\\textsc{Upper Bound: Full Cache (100\\%)}} \\\\\n\n LLaVA-1.5-7B &\n 40.3 & 45.6 & 31.8 & 37.9 &\n 56.9 & 33.2 & 12.7 & 24.3 & 61.0 &\n 5.3 & 4.0 &\n 32.1 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n\n \\midrule\n\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{14}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 10\\% Tokens}} \\\\\n\n H2O\\pub{(NeurIPS23)\\cite{zhang2023h2o}} &\n 37.4 & 42.9 & 29.0 & 35.1 &\n 53.8 & 29.5 & 9.8 & 21.0 & 58.1 &\n 2.8 & 1.5 &\n 29.2 & 90.9\\% \\\\\n\n SnapKV\\pub{(NeurIPS24)\\cite{li2024snapkv}} &\n 36.9 & 42.4 & 28.6 & 34.6 &\n 53.4 & 29.7 & 9.5 & 21.2 & 57.4 &\n 1.9 & 1.7 &\n 28.8 & 89.9\\% \\\\\n\n PyramidKV\\pub{(arXiv25)\\cite{cai2024pyramidkv}} &\n 37.1 & 42.7 & 28.8 & 34.9 &\n 53.9 & 30.1 & 9.6 & 21.1 & 57.8 &\n 2.1 & 1.4 &\n 29.0 & 90.5\\% \\\\\n\n LOOK-M\\pub{(EMNLP24)\\cite{wan2024lookm}} &\n 38.8 & 44.0 & 30.0 & 36.3 &\n 55.4 & 31.3 & 10.9 & 22.8 & 59.2 &\n 3.5 & 2.6 &\n 30.4 & 94.8\\% \\\\\n\n MEDA\\pub{(NAACL25)\\cite{wan2025meda}} &\n 40.1 & \\textbf{45.1} & \\textbf{31.1} & 37.4 &\n 56.5 & 32.8 & 12.1 & 24.0 & 60.7 &\n 4.9 & 4.1 &\n 31.7 & 98.8\\% \\\\\n\n FastV\\pub{(ECCV24)\\cite{chen2024image}} &\n 32.0 & 42.4 & 28.2 & 34.2 &\n 51.1 & 29.7 & \\textbf{15.0} & 24.5 & 62.0 &\n 5.3 & 3.2 &\n 29.8 & 92.8\\% \\\\\n\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} &\n \\textbf{44.7} & 25.9 & 20.8 & 39.1 &\n 54.0 & 30.3 & 6.7 & \\textbf{25.9} & 69.5 &\n 12.2 & 9.7 &\n 30.8 & 96.0\\% \\\\\n\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\textbf{Ours} &\n 42.3 & 33.8 & 18.0 & \\textbf{43.9} &\n \\textbf{58.5} & \\textbf{34.8} & 7.9 & 24.6 & \\textbf{71.0} &\n \\textbf{12.5} & \\textbf{11.3} &\n \\textbf{32.6} & \\textbf{101.6\\%} \\\\\n\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n\\end{table*}\n\n================================================\nFILE: tables/extra_vllm_deployment_rowwise.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{table}[t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{\n vLLM serving benchmark with \\textbf{LLaVA-NeXT-7B}.\n }\n \\label{tab:extra_vllm_deployment_rowwise}\n \\resizebox{\\linewidth}{!}{\n {\\small\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{1.5pt}\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.05}\n \\begin{tabular}{@{}lccc@{}}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Metric} & \\textbf{Baseline} & \\textbf{ERA} & \\textbf{Gain} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\textsc{Batch=256}} \\\\\n Amortized E2E Time / Req. (ms) & 77.7 & 23.9 & \\textbf{3.3$\\times$ speedup} \\\\\n LLM Prefill(ms) & 167.01 & 39.22 & \\textbf{4.3$\\times$ speedup} \\\\\n Decode Throughput (tok/s) & 68.3 & 70.4 & comparable \\\\\n Avg. Prefill Tokens & 1845 & 373 & \\textbf{4.9$\\times$ compression} \\\\\n KV Cache / Req. (GB) & 0.901 & 0.182 & \\textbf{5.0$\\times$ reduction} \\\\\n Peak GPU Memory (GB) & 243.69 & 59.69 & \\textbf{4.1$\\times$ lower} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\textsc{Batch=48}} \\\\\n Amortized E2E Time / Req. (ms) & 81.8 & 37.6 & \\textbf{2.2$\\times$ speedup} \\\\\n LLM Prefill(ms) & 57.91 & 17.89 & \\textbf{3.2$\\times$ speedup} \\\\\n KV Cache / Req. (GB) & 0.272 & 0.046 & \\textbf{5.9$\\times$ reduction} \\\\\n Peak GPU Memory (GB) & 26.16 & 15.35 & \\textbf{10.81 GB lower} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\textsc{Batch=1}} \\\\\n Amortized E2E Time / Req. (ms) & 611.4 & 507.3 & \\textbf{1.2$\\times$ speedup} \\\\\n LLM Prefill(ms) & 37.02 & 15.73 & \\textbf{2.4$\\times$ speedup} \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n }\n\\end{table}\n\n================================================\nFILE: tables/main_Efficiency.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{\n Efficiency and accuracy comparison with \\textbf{LLaVA-NeXT-7B}. Metrics cover FLOPs, latency, memory usage and average performance retention.\n }\n \\label{tab:efficiency_comparison_1_6_final}\n \\resizebox{0.925\\textwidth}{!}{\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.05}\n\n % 新增了一列，共9列\n \\begin{tabular}{l | c c c c c c c c}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Method} & \\textbf{Token} & \\textbf{FLOPs} & \\textbf{E2E Latency} & \\textbf{Prefill} & \\textbf{Decode / Token} & \\textbf{KV Cache} & \\textbf{GPU Memory} & \\textbf{Avg.} \\\\\n & \\scriptsize{(\\#)} & \\scriptsize{(TFLOPs)} & \\scriptsize{(ms)} & \\scriptsize{(ms)} & \\scriptsize{(ms)} & \\scriptsize{(GB)} & \\scriptsize{(GB)} & \\scriptsize{(\\%)} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= BASELINE =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{9}{c}{\\textsc{Baseline: Full Model}} \\\\\n \n LLaVA-NeXT-7B & 2880 & 66.1 & 544 & 415 & 25 & 1.44 & 18.6 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= COMPRESSED METHODS =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{9}{c}{\\textsc{Lightweight Methods (Retain 160 Tokens)}} \\\\\n PDrop\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{xing2024pyramid}} & 160 & 17.4 & 249 & 129 & 29 & \\textbf{0.08} & 16.1 & $<$79.2\\% \\\\\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 160 & \\textbf{5.6} & 232 & 93 & 33 & \\textbf{0.08} & 15.3 & 88.9\\% \\\\\n DART\\pub{(EMNLP25)\\cite{wen2025stop}} & 160 & \\underline{8.6} & \\textbf{192} & 93 & \\textbf{27} & \\textbf{0.08} & \\textbf{13.8} & 90.5\\% \\\\\n CDPruner\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{zhang2025beyond}} & 160 & \\textbf{5.6} & \\underline{198} & \\textbf{85} & \\underline{28} & \\textbf{0.08} & \\underline{14.3} & \\underline{95.5\\%} \\\\\n \n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\textbf{Ours} & 160 & \\textbf{5.6} & 200 & \\underline{91} & \\textbf{27} & \\textbf{0.08} & 14.6 & \\textbf{95.8\\%} \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n\\end{table*}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: tables/main_LLAVA_13B.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{Token-budget comparison with \\textbf{LLaVA-1.5-13B}.}\n \\resizebox{0.945\\textwidth}{!}{\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{6.5pt}\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1}\n\n \\begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Method} & \\textbf{VQA$^{\\text{v2}}$} & \\textbf{GQA} & \\textbf{SQA$^{\\text{I}}$} &\n \\textbf{VQA$^{\\text{T}}$} & \\textbf{POPE} & \\textbf{MME} &\n \\textbf{MMB$^{\\text{E}}$} & \\textbf{MMB$^{\\text{C}}$} &\n \\textbf{MMVet} & \\textbf{Avg. (\\%)} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{11}{c}{\\textsc{Upper Bound: 576 Tokens (100\\%)}} \\\\\n LLaVA-1.5-13B & 80.0 & 63.3 & 72.8 & 61.2 & 86.0 & 1531.2 & 68.5 & 63.5 & 36.2 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{11}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 128 Tokens} ($\\downarrow$ 77.8\\%)} \\\\\n FastV\\pub{(ECCV24)\\cite{chen2024image}} & 75.3 & 58.3 & 74.2 & 58.6 & 75.5 & 1460.6 & 66.1 & 62.3 & 32.8 & 94.7\\% \\\\\n PDrop\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{xing2024pyramid}} & \\textbf{78.2} & \\textbf{61.0} & 73.3 & \\textbf{60.2} & 83.6 & \\textbf{1489.5} & 67.5 & \\textbf{62.8} & 32.1 & 97.1\\% \\\\\n SparseVLM\\pub{(ICML25)\\cite{zhang2024sparsevlm}} & 77.6 & 59.6 & \\textbf{74.3} & \\underline{59.3} & 85.0 & \\underline{1487.9} & \\textbf{68.4} & \\underline{62.6} & 35.2 & 97.9\\% \\\\\n PruMerge+\\pub{(ICCV25)\\cite{shang2025llava}}& 76.2 & 58.3 & 73.3 & 56.1 & 82.7 & 1445.9 & 66.3 & 61.2 & 33.6 & 95.1\\% \\\\\n TRIM\\pub{(COLING25)\\cite{song2024trim}} & 76.4 & 59.4 & 72.4 & 55.0 & 86.8 & 1426.9 & 67.1 & 58.4 & 35.1 & 95.5\\% \\\\\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 76.8 & 57.9 & 73.8 & 58.9 & 82.7 & 1449.2 & 67.4 & 62.5 & 36.0 & 96.9\\% \\\\\n DART\\pub{(EMNLP25)\\cite{wen2025stop}} & 75.7 & 57.7 & \\underline{74.2} & 58.7 & 80.4 & 1395.0 & 65.4 & 62.2 & 34.8 & 95.3\\% \\\\\n DivPrune\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{alvar2025divprune}} & 77.1 & 59.2 & 72.8 & 58.0 & 86.8 & 1457.7 & 66.3 & 60.7 & 34.4 & 96.5\\% \\\\\n VisPruner\\pub{(ICCV25)\\cite{wang2025vispruner}} & 76.9 & 58.4 & 73.9 & 59.2 & 83.8 & 1428.0 & 67.2 & 62.2 & 36.9 & 97.3\\% \\\\\n CDPruner\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{zhang2025beyond}} & 77.7 & \\underline{59.7} & 73.2 & 58.4 & \\textbf{87.3} & 1478.0 & 67.5 & 61.5 & \\underline{36.2} & \\underline{97.9\\%} \\\\\n AgilePrune\\pub{(ICLR26)\\cite{baek2026agilepruner}} & 77.5 & 59.1 & 72.8 & 58.9 & 86.9 & 1481.0 & \\underline{67.6} & 61.9 & - & 97.6\\% \\\\\n ZOO-Prune\\pub{(CVPR26)\\cite{kim2026zooprune}} & 77.8 & 58.9 & 73.4 & 58.8 & \\underline{87.0} & 1484.7 & 67.0 & 60.9 & - & 97.4\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\textbf{Ours} & \\underline{77.9} & 59.5 & 73.4 & 58.2 & 86.9 & 1467.1 & 67.1 & 61.7 & \\textbf{37.2} & \\textbf{98.0\\%} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{11}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 64 Tokens} ($\\downarrow$ 88.9\\%)} \\\\\n FastV\\pub{(ECCV24)\\cite{chen2024image}} & 65.3 & 51.9 & 73.1 & 53.4 & 56.9 & 1246.4 & 59.2 & 55.1 & 26.9 & 82.9\\% \\\\\n PDrop\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{xing2024pyramid}} & 70.8 & 54.1 & 73.1 & 55.3 & 66.1 & 1247.0 & 63.1 & 56.6 & 21.9 & 85.0\\% \\\\\n SparseVLM\\pub{(ICML25)\\cite{zhang2024sparsevlm}} & 73.2 & 55.9 & 73.0 & 57.1 & 77.9 & 1374.3 & 65.2 & 60.3 & 32.9 & 92.8\\% \\\\\n PruMerge+\\pub{(ICCV25)\\cite{shang2025llava}}& 72.6 & 56.3 & 73.5 & 54.4 & 75.7 & 1338.2 & 65.0 & 59.3 & 30.3 & 90.8\\% \\\\\n TRIM\\pub{(COLING25)\\cite{song2024trim}} & 73.2 & 57.9 & 72.0 & 52.0 & \\underline{86.5} & 1406.2 & 65.0 & 52.7 & 27.8 & 90.4\\% \\\\\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 73.7 & 56.2 & \\textbf{74.2} & 57.4 & 75.7 & 1379.6 & 64.9 & \\underline{61.3} & 33.4 & 93.1\\% \\\\\n DART\\pub{(EMNLP25)\\cite{wen2025stop}} & 72.4 & 55.7 & \\underline{73.8} & 57.3 & 72.8 & 1380.0 & 64.7 & 60.6 & 32.8 & 92.1\\% \\\\\n DivPrune\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{alvar2025divprune}} & 75.2 & 57.9 & 71.7 & 57.4 & 84.5 & \\underline{1454.2} & 64.1 & 59.8 & 29.3 & 93.3\\% \\\\\n VisPruner\\pub{(ICCV25)\\cite{wang2025vispruner}} & 73.9 & 56.0 & 74.0 & 57.9 & 79.2 & 1408.9 & 65.0 & 59.9 & 33.1 & 93.5\\% \\\\\n CDPruner\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{zhang2025beyond}} & \\underline{76.7} & \\textbf{59.4} & 72.5 & 57.6 & \\textbf{87.1} & \\textbf{1466.8} & 65.5 & 58.8 & \\underline{35.2} & \\underline{96.2\\%} \\\\\n AgilePrune\\pub{(ICLR26)\\cite{baek2026agilepruner}} & 75.7 & 57.5 & 72.0 & \\textbf{58.6} & 82.0 & 1437.0 & \\textbf{66.2} & \\textbf{61.6} & - & 95.4\\% \\\\\n ZOO-Prune\\pub{(CVPR26)\\cite{kim2026zooprune}} & 76.4 & 58.6 & 72.1 & \\textbf{58.6} & 85.3 & 1438.6 & 64.8 & 60.1 & - & 95.7\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\textbf{Ours} & \\textbf{77.2} & \\underline{58.8} & 72.5 & \\underline{57.7} & 85.5 & 1446.2 & \\underline{66.1} & 60.7 & \\textbf{37.1} & \\textbf{96.9\\%} \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n \\label{tab:cdpruner_t3_llava15_13b}\n\\end{table*}\n\n================================================\nFILE: tables/main_NEO_2B.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{table}[t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{Encoder-free MLLM comparison with \\textbf{NEO-2B}.}\n \\label{tab:neo_2b_final_corrected}\n \n \\resizebox{0.489\\textwidth}{!}{ \n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{2.5pt} \n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.1} \n\n \\begin{tabular}{lccccccc}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Method} & \\textbf{AI2D} & \\textbf{VQA$^{\\text{T}}$} & \\textbf{HaluBench} & \\textbf{POPE} & \\textbf{MMB$^{\\text{E}}$} & \\textbf{MMB$^{\\text{C}}$} & \\textbf{Avg. (\\%)} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= UPPER BOUND =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{8}{c}{\\textsc{Upper Bound: Dynamic Resolution (100\\%)}} \\\\\n NEO-2B & 80.2 & 73.8 & 44.6 & 87.5 & 75.3 & 72.4 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= 50% TOKEN =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{8}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 50\\% Tokens}} \\\\\n FastV\\pub{(ECCV24)\\cite{chen2024image}} & 78.1 & 53.7 & \\textbf{43.4} & \\underline{86.9} & \\underline{75.4} & \\textbf{71.8} & 94.4\\% \\\\\n CDPruner\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{zhang2025beyond}} & 78.3 & 71.2 & 41.6 & 86.3 & 75.3 & \\underline{71.5} & \\underline{97.5\\%} \\\\\n DivPrune\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{alvar2025divprune}} & \\underline{79.0} & \\underline{67.2} & 42.0 & 86.3 & 73.6 & 70.8 & 96.3\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\textbf{Ours} & \\textbf{79.2} & \\textbf{72.4} & \\underline{42.1} & \\textbf{87.7} & \\textbf{75.8} & 71.1 & \\textbf{98.4\\%} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= 20% TOKEN =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{8}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 20\\% Tokens}} \\\\\n FastV\\pub{(ECCV24)\\cite{chen2024image}} & 74.5 & 44.9 & \\textbf{38.4} & 81.6 & \\underline{72.0} & \\underline{68.5} & 87.2\\% \\\\\n CDPruner\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{zhang2025beyond}} & \\underline{74.7} & \\underline{62.2} & 36.9 & \\underline{82.5} & 70.4 & 65.7 & \\underline{89.8\\%} \\\\\n DivPrune\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{alvar2025divprune}} & 73.3 & 41.1 & 34.0 & 80.0 & 67.6 & 63.8 & 82.1\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\textbf{Ours} & \\textbf{77.2} & \\textbf{68.0} & \\underline{37.6} & \\textbf{88.1} & \\textbf{75.1} & \\textbf{70.9} & \\textbf{95.2\\%} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= 10% TOKEN =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{8}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 10\\% Tokens}} \\\\\n FastV\\pub{(ECCV24)\\cite{chen2024image}} & 68.9 & 30.8 & \\textbf{36.6} & 73.9 & \\underline{67.1} & \\underline{65.1} & 78.9\\% \\\\\n CDPruner\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{zhang2025beyond}} & \\underline{70.0} & \\underline{52.9} & 35.3 & \\underline{78.0} & 66.7 & 60.6 & \\underline{83.2\\%} \\\\\n DivPrune\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{alvar2025divprune}} & 66.9 & 23.3 & 32.4 & 67.0 & 53.2 & 50.7 & 67.5\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\textbf{Ours} & \\textbf{73.7} & \\textbf{60.5} & \\underline{35.2} & \\textbf{87.9} & \\textbf{73.8} & \\textbf{68.8} & \\textbf{91.1\\%} \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n\\end{table}\n\n================================================\nFILE: tables/main_Qwen2.5-VL-7B.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{table}[t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{\n Dynamic-resolution comparison with \\textbf{Qwen2.5-VL-7B}.}\n \\label{tab:qwen2.5_vl_7b_comparison_v3}\n \n % 请确保导言区定义了 \\pub 命令\n % \\newcommand{\\pub}[1]{{\\color{gray}\\fontsize{6pt}{7pt}\\selectfont #1}}\n \n \\resizebox{0.489\\textwidth}{!}{ \n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{2.5pt} \n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.05} \n\n \\begin{tabular}{lccccccc}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Method} & \\textbf{AI2D} & \\textbf{ChartQA} & \\textbf{POPE} & \\textbf{MME} & \\textbf{MMB$^{\\text{E}}$} & \\textbf{MMB$^{\\text{C}}$} & \\textbf{Avg. (\\%)} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= UPPER BOUND =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{8}{c}{\\textsc{Upper Bound: Dynamic Resolution (100\\%)}} \\\\\n Qwen2.5-VL-7B & 80.8 & 86.2 & 86.6 & 2306.5 & 79.8 & 82.4 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= 50% TOKEN =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{8}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 50\\% Tokens}} \\\\\n FastV\\pub{(ECCV24)\\cite{chen2024image}} & \\textbf{79.9} & \\textbf{83.3} & \\textbf{86.3} & 2286.7 & \\textbf{80.2} & \\underline{81.3} & \\textbf{98.9\\%} \\\\\n CDPruner\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{zhang2025beyond}} & 75.7 & 69.5 & \\underline{85.7} & 2221.6 & 78.4 & 70.2 & 92.2\\% \\\\\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 79.2 & 78.1 & 85.0 & \\underline{2292.6} & \\underline{80.1} & 81.0 & 97.5\\% \\\\\n % HAWK\\pub{(CVPR26)}\\cite{zhu2026hawk} & 76.4 & 76.0 & 84.9 & 2245.3 & 78.7 & 68.9 & 90.8\\% \\\\\n % DPPruner\\pub{(NeurIPS25)} & 79.3 & 78.9 & 85.6 & 2257.1 & 79.1 & 72.5 & 95.6\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\textbf{Ours} & \\underline{79.8} & \\underline{82.7} & 84.9 & \\textbf{2305.5} & 79.0 & \\textbf{81.6} & \\underline{98.5\\%} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= 20% TOKEN =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{8}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 20\\% Tokens}} \\\\\n FastV\\pub{(ECCV24)\\cite{chen2024image}} & \\underline{76.5} & \\underline{57.8} & \\underline{82.9} & \\textbf{2225.4} & \\textbf{78.8} & \\underline{79.1} & \\underline{91.5\\%} \\\\\n CDPruner\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{zhang2025beyond}} & 70.8 & 52.0 & 80.4 & 2068.2 & 73.5 & 65.9 & 83.8\\% \\\\\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 74.7 & 55.0 & 81.8 & 2212.2 & 78.1 & 78.6 & 90.0\\% \\\\\n % DPPruner\\pub{(NeurIPS25)} & 75.3 & 56.8 & 84.4 & 2200.1 & 75.8 & 65.9 & 87.8\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\textbf{Ours} & \\textbf{77.2} & \\textbf{70.2} & \\textbf{83.4} & \\underline{2224.3} & \\underline{78.4} & \\textbf{79.6} & \\textbf{94.1\\%} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= 10% TOKEN =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{8}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 10\\% Tokens}} \\\\\n FastV\\pub{(ECCV24)\\cite{chen2024image}} & \\underline{72.6} & 34.6 & 75.8 & 1975.4 & 74.1 & 75.4 & 81.2\\% \\\\\n CDPruner\\pub{(NeurIPS25)\\cite{zhang2025beyond}} & 67.9 & \\underline{42.0} & 75.6 & 1872.3 & 69.0 & 62.9 & 77.3\\% \\\\\n VisionZip\\pub{(CVPR25)\\cite{yang2025visionzip}} & 69.6 & 38.3 & \\underline{77.7} & \\underline{2019.9} & \\underline{75.2} & \\underline{77.5} & \\underline{82.7\\%} \\\\\n % DPPruner\\pub{(NeurIPS25)} & 71.8 & 40.0 & 81.9 & 1991.9 & 72.3 & 63.3 & 80.6\\% \\\\\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\textbf{Ours} & \\textbf{74.1} & \\textbf{54.5} & \\textbf{81.3} & \\textbf{2041.2} & \\textbf{77.1} & \\textbf{78.5} & \\textbf{88.2\\%} \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n \\vspace{-3mm}\n\\end{table}\n\n================================================\nFILE: tables/main_ablation.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{table}[t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{\n Module ablation with \\textbf{LLaVA-1.5-7B}. DEP($\\mathbf{x}$) and DEP($\\mathbf{y}$) denote diversity-based and saliency-based DEP, respectively.\n }\n \\label{tab:ablation_main}\n \n \\resizebox{0.489\\textwidth}{!}{ \n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4.0pt}\n \\small\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.05}\n\n \\begin{tabular}{@{}cccccccc@{}}\n \\toprule\n \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\textbf{Modules}} & \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\textbf{Downstream Tasks}} \\\\\n \\cmidrule(lr){1-4} \\cmidrule(lr){5-8}\n \t\\textbf{DEP($\\mathbf{x}$)} & \\textbf{DEP($\\mathbf{y}$)} & \\textbf{BTR} & \\textbf{LAR} & \\textbf{VQA$^{\\text{T}}$} & \\textbf{POPE} & \\textbf{GQA} & \\textbf{Avg. (\\%)} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= UPPER BOUND =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{8}{c}{\\textsc{Upper Bound: 576 Tokens (100\\%)}} \\\\\n \\multicolumn{4}{c}{LLaVA-1.5-7B} & 58.2 & 85.9 & 61.9 & 100.0\\% \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= 128 TOKENS =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{8}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 128 Tokens} ($\\downarrow$ 77.8\\%)} \\\\\n \\cmark & & & & 55.8 & 85.4 & 59.0 & 96.9\\% \\\\\n & \\cmark & & & \\textbf{56.9} & 82.6 & 57.9 & 95.8\\% \\\\\n \\cmark & \\cmark & & & 56.3 & 87.0 & 59.2 & 97.9\\% \\\\\n \\cmark & \\cmark & \\cmark & & 56.5 & \\underline{87.1} & \\underline{59.2} & \\underline{98.0\\%} \\\\\n % Full Method Row\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\cmark & \\cmark & \\cmark & \\cmark & \\underline{56.6} & \\textbf{87.6} & \\textbf{59.6} & \\textbf{98.5\\%} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= 64 TOKENS =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{8}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 64 Tokens} ($\\downarrow$ 88.9\\%)} \\\\\n \\cmark & & & & 54.1 & 84.1 & 57.5 & 94.6\\% \\\\\n & \\cmark & & & 54.5 & 75.7 & 55.4 & 90.4\\% \\\\\n \\cmark & \\cmark & & & 55.2 & \\underline{86.0} & 57.8 & 96.1\\% \\\\\n \\cmark & \\cmark & \\cmark & & \\underline{55.7} & 85.2 & \\underline{58.0} & \\underline{96.2\\%} \\\\\n % Full Method Row\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\cmark & \\cmark & \\cmark & \\cmark & \\textbf{55.9} & \\textbf{87.0} & \\textbf{58.5} & \\textbf{97.3\\%} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n % ================= 32 TOKENS =================\n \\rowcolor{headergray}\n \\multicolumn{8}{c}{\\textsc{Retain 32 Tokens} ($\\downarrow$ 94.4\\%)} \\\\\n \\cmark & & & & 52.9 & 81.8 & 54.2 & 91.2\\% \\\\\n & \\cmark & & & 53.3 & 68.2 & 51.7 & 84.8\\% \\\\\n \\cmark & \\cmark & & & 53.7 & 82.9 & 55.3 & 92.7\\% \\\\\n \\cmark & \\cmark & \\cmark & & \\underline{54.3} & \\underline{83.1} & \\underline{56.3} & \\underline{93.7\\%} \\\\\n % Full Method Row\n \\rowcolor{rowblue}\n \\cmark & \\cmark & \\cmark & \\cmark & \\textbf{54.6} & \\textbf{85.6} & \\textbf{56.9} & \\textbf{95.1\\%} \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n\\end{table}\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091183,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31983"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31983"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Fatemeh Ahmadi"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Fatemeh Ahmadi, Tobias Bernhard, Mohamed Abdelmaksoud, Luca Zecchini, Tilmann Rabl, Ziawasch Abedjan"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Clean Me If You Can: A Large Collection of Real-World Addresses for Data Cleaning Benchmarking"},"comments":{"kind":"null"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.DB"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"There has been extensive research on automating and scaling data cleaning, i.e., the detection and correction of erroneous values in tabular data. Yet, existing approaches often perform well only within controlled environments. One of the major bottlenecks in data cleaning research is the lack of real-world datasets. In this paper, we address this gap by providing a large, dirty dataset with postal entries and their corresponding ground truth. We discuss the design decisions and challenges for obtaining the dataset. We demonstrate the limitations of existing cleaning approaches when faced with our proposed datasets and derive guidelines for future research."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:21:48 GMT"},{"version":"v2","created":"Wed, 01 Jul 2026 07:13:51 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:21:48 GMT\"\n },\n {\n \"version\": \"v2\",\n \"created\": \"Wed, 01 Jul 2026 07:13:51 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-02"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Ahmadi","Fatemeh",""],["Bernhard","Tobias",""],["Abdelmaksoud","Mohamed",""],["Zecchini","Luca",""],["Rabl","Tilmann",""],["Abedjan","Ziawasch",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Ahmadi\",\n \"Fatemeh\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Bernhard\",\n \"Tobias\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Abdelmaksoud\",\n \"Mohamed\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Zecchini\",\n \"Luca\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Rabl\",\n \"Tilmann\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Abedjan\",\n \"Ziawasch\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: abbreviations.bib\n================================================\n% This file was created with JabRef 2.9.2.\n% Encoding: Cp1252\n\n@PREAMBLE{ {\\providecommand{\\noopsort}[1]{}} }\n\n@STRING{AAAI = {Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence\n\t(AAAI)}}\n\n@STRING{AAW = {Reading, MA, USA}}\n\n@STRING{ADBIS = {Advances in Databases and Information Systems (ADBIS)}}\n\n@STRING{ADDR-MITPRESS = {Cambridge, MA, USA}}\n\n@STRING{AI = {Artificial Intelligence}}\n\n@STRING{AICOMM={AI Communications}}\n\n@STRING{AIMAG = {AI Magazine}}\n\n@STRING{AMG = {New York, NY}}\n\n@STRING{AMK = {San Francisco, CA, USA}}\n\n@STRING{APH = {Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA}}\n\n@STRING{ASP = {Berlin -- Heidelberg -- New York}}\n\n@STRING{AW = {Addison-Wesley}}\n\n@STRING{BTW = {Proceedings of the Conference Datenbanksysteme in B\\\"uro, Technik\n\tund Wissenschaft (BTW)}}\n\n@STRING{BTW2 = {Proceedings of the Conference Datenbanksysteme in Business, Technologie\n\tund Web Technik (BTW)}}\n\n@STRING{CACM = {Communications of the ACM (CACM)}}\n\n@STRING{CAISE = {Proceedings of the Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering\n\t(CAiSE)}}\n\n@STRING{CIDR = {Proceedings of the Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research\n\t(CIDR)}}\n\n@STRING{CIKM = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge\n\tManagement (CIKM)}}\n\n@STRING{COMAD = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Data\n\t(COMAD)}}\n\t\n@STRING{TCJ={The Computer Journal}}\n\n@STRING{COOPIS = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Cooperative Information\n\tSystems (CoopIS)}}\n\n@STRING{CSUR = {ACM Computing Surveys}}\n\n@STRING{IJDMMM={International Journal of Data Mining, Modelling and Management}}\n\n@STRING{DASFAA = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Database Systems for\n\tAdvanced Applications (DASFAA)}}\n\t\n@STRING{DAWAK={Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery (Da{W}a{K})}}\n\n@STRING{DBISP2P = {Proceedings of the International Workshop on Databases, Information\n\tSystems and Peer-to-Peer Computing (DBISP2P)}}\n\n@STRING{DBPL = {Proceedings of the International Workshop on Database Programming\n\tLanguages}}\n\n@STRING{DBSPEKTRUM = {Datenbank Spektrum}}\n\n@STRING{DE = {IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin}}\n\n@STRING{DEXA = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Database and Expert\n\tSystems Applications (DEXA)}}\n\n@STRING{DILS = {Proceedings of the International Workshop on Data Integration for\n\tthe Life Sciences (DILS)}}\n\n@STRING{DKE = {Data and Knowledge Engineering (DKE)}}\n\n@STRING{DMKD = {Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery}}\n\n@STRING{DOOD = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Deductive and Object-Oriented\n\tDatabases (DOOD)}}\n\n@STRING{DPUNKT = {dpunkt.verlag, Heidelberg}}\n\n@STRING{DQCIS = {Proceedings of the International Workshop on Data Quality in Cooperative\n\tInformation Systsems (DQCIS)}}\n\n@STRING{EDBT = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Extending Database\n\tTechnology (EDBT)}}\n\n@STRING{EFIS = {Proceedings of the International Workshop on Engineering Federated\n\tInformation Systems (EFIS)}}\n\n@STRING{ER = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Conceptual Modeling\n\t(ER)}}\n\n@STRING{ESWC = {Proceedings of the Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC)}}\n\n@STRING{FDBS = {Proceedings of the Workshop F\\\"oderierte Datenbanken (FDBS)}}\n\n@STRING{FOCS = {Proceedings of the Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science}}\n\n@STRING{FQAS = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Flexible Query Answering\n\tSystems (FQAS)}}\n\n@STRING{ICDE = {Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)}}\n\n@STRING{ICDT = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT)}}\n\n@STRING{ICDM={Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM)}}\n\n@STRING{IDEAS = {Proceedings of the International Database Engineering and Applications\n\tSymposium (IDEAS)}}\n\n@STRING{IIS = {Journal of Intelligent Information Systems}}\n\n@STRING{IIWEB = {Proceedings of the International Workshop on Information Integration\n\ton the Web (IIWeb)}}\n\n@STRING{IJCAI = {Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence\n\t(IJCAI)}}\n\n@STRING{IQ = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality\n\t(IQ)}}\n\n@STRING{IQIS = {Proceedings of the SIGMOD International Workshop on Information Quality\n\tfor Information Systems (IQIS)}}\n\n@STRING{IS = {Information Systems}}\n\n@STRING{ISWC = {Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC)}}\n\n@STRING{JACM = {Journal of the ACM}}\n\n@STRING{JDIGLIB = {Journal of Digital Libraries}}\n\n@STRING{JMOLBIOL = {Journal of Molecular Biology}}\n\n@STRING{JWS = {Journal of Web Semantics}}\n\n@STRING{KAIS = {Knowledge and Information Systems}}\n\n@STRING{KRDB = {Proceedings of the International Workshop on Knowledge Represenation\n\tMeets Databases (KRDB)}}\n\t\n@STRING{MOBIDE={Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Data Engineering for Wireless and Mobile Access (MobiDE)}}\n\n@STRING{MG = {McGraw-Hill, Inc.}}\n\n@STRING{MIT = {MIT Press}}\n\n@STRING{MK = {Morgan Kaufmann}}\n\n@STRING{NTII = {Proceedings of the International Workshop on New Trends in Information\n\tIntegration (NTII)}}\n\n@STRING{PACMMOD = {Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data (PACMMOD)}}\n\n@STRING{PDIS = {Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed\n\tInformation Systems(PDIS)}}\n\n@STRING{PH = {Prentice-Hall}}\n\n@STRING{PKDD = {European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery\n\t(PKDD)}}\n\n@STRING{PNAS = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)}}\n\n@STRING{PODS = {Proceedings of the Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS)}}\n\n@STRING{PVLDB = {Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (PVLDB)}}\n\n@STRING{QDB = {Proceedings of the International Workshop on Quality in Databases\n\t(QDB)}}\n\n@STRING{RIDE = {Proceedings of the International Workshop on Research Issues in Data\n\tEngineering (RIDE)}}\n\n@STRING{SCIENCE = {Science}}\n\n@STRING{SIAMJC = {SIAM Journal on Computing}}\n\n@STRING{SIGKDD = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge discovery\n\tand data mining (SIGKDD)}}\n\n@STRING{SIGMOD = {Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Management of Data\n\t(SIGMOD)}}\n\n@STRING{SIGMODREC = {ACM SIGMOD Record}}\n\n@STRING{SP = {Springer Verlag}}\n\n@STRING{SSDBM = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific and Statistical\n\tDatabase Management (SSDBM)}}\n\n@STRING{STOC = {Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)}}\n\n@STRING{TAGT = {Proceedings of the International Workshop on Theory and Application\n\tof Graph Transformations (TAGT)}}\n\t\n@STRING{TCS = {Theoretical Computer Science}}\n\n@STRING{TKDD = {ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data}}\n\n@STRING{TKDE = {IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (TKDE)}}\n\n@STRING{TODS = {ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS)}}\n\n@STRING{TOIS = {ACM Transactions on Information Systems}}\n\n@STRING{VDB = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Visual Database Systems\n\t(VDB)}}\n\n@STRING{VLDB = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases\n\t(VLDB)}}\n\n@STRING{VLDBJ = {VLDB Journal}}\n\n@STRING{WEBDB = {Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB)}}\n\n@STRING{WISE = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Information Systems\n\tEngineering (WISE)}}\n\n@STRING{WITS = {Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems\n\t(WITS)}}\n\n@STRING{WWW = {Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference (WWW)}}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: acmart.cls\n================================================\n%%\n%% This is file `acmart.cls',\n%% generated with the docstrip utility.\n%%\n%% The original source files were:\n%%\n%% acmart.dtx (with options: `class')\n%% \n%% IMPORTANT NOTICE:\n%% \n%% For the copyright see the source file.\n%% \n%% Any modified versions of this file must be renamed\n%% with new filenames distinct from acmart.cls.\n%% \n%% For distribution of the original source see the terms\n%% for copying and modification in the file acmart.dtx.\n%% \n%% This generated file may be distributed as long as the\n%% original source files, as listed above, are part of the\n%% same distribution. (The sources need not necessarily be\n%% in the same archive or directory.)\n%% \\CharacterTable\n%% {Upper-case \\A\\B\\C\\D\\E\\F\\G\\H\\I\\J\\K\\L\\M\\N\\O\\P\\Q\\R\\S\\T\\U\\V\\W\\X\\Y\\Z\n%% Lower-case \\a\\b\\c\\d\\e\\f\\g\\h\\i\\j\\k\\l\\m\\n\\o\\p\\q\\r\\s\\t\\u\\v\\w\\x\\y\\z\n%% Digits \\0\\1\\2\\3\\4\\5\\6\\7\\8\\9\n%% Exclamation \\! Double quote \\\" Hash (number) \\#\n%% Dollar \\$ Percent \\% Ampersand \\&\n%% Acute accent \\' Left paren \\( Right paren \\)\n%% Asterisk \\* Plus \\+ Comma \\,\n%% Minus \\- Point \\. Solidus \\/\n%% Colon \\: Semicolon \\; Less than \\<\n%% Equals \\= Greater than \\> Question mark \\?\n%% Commercial at \\@ Left bracket \\[ Backslash \\\\\n%% Right bracket \\] Circumflex \\^ Underscore \\_\n%% Grave accent \\` Left brace \\{ Vertical bar \\|\n%% Right brace \\} Tilde \\~}\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesClass{acmart}\n[2020/02/22 v1.70 Typesetting articles for the Association for Computing Machinery]\n\\def\\@classname{acmart}\n\\InputIfFileExists{acmart-preload-hook.tex}{%\n \\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{%\n I am loading acmart-preload-hook.tex. You are fully responsible\n for any problems from now on.}}{}\n\\RequirePackage{xkeyval}\n\\RequirePackage{xstring}\n\\define@choicekey*+{acmart.cls}{format}[\\ACM@format\\ACM@format@nr]{%\n manuscript, acmsmall, acmlarge, acmtog, sigconf, siggraph,\n sigplan, sigchi, sigchi-a}[manuscript]{}{%\n \\ClassError{\\@classname}{The option format must be manuscript,\n acmsmall, acmlarge, acmtog, sigconf, siggraph,\n sigplan, sigchi or sigchi-a}}\n\\def\\@DeclareACMFormat#1{\\DeclareOptionX{#1}{\\setkeys{acmart.cls}{format=#1}}}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{manuscript}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{acmsmall}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{acmlarge}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{acmtog}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{sigconf}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{siggraph}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{sigplan}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{sigchi}\n\\@DeclareACMFormat{sigchi-a}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{format}\n\\define@boolkey+{acmart.cls}[@ACM@]{screen}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@screen\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using screen mode}%\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Not using screen mode}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option screen can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{screen=false}\n\\define@boolkey+{acmart.cls}[@ACM@]{urlbreakonhyphens}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@urlbreakonhyphens\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using breaking urls on hyphens}%\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Not breaking urls on hyphens}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option urlbreakonhyphens can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{urlbreakonhyphens=true}\n\\define@boolkey+{acmart.cls}[@ACM@]{acmthm}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@acmthm\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Requiring acmthm}%\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Suppressing acmthm}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option acmthm can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{acmthm=true}\n\\define@boolkey+{acmart.cls}[@ACM@]{review}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@review\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using review mode}%\n \\AtBeginDocument{\\@ACM@printfoliostrue}%\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Not using review mode}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option review can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{review=false}\n\\define@boolkey+{acmart.cls}[@ACM@]{authorversion}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@authorversion\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using authorversion mode}%\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Not using authorversion mode}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option authorversion can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{authorversion=false}\n\\define@boolkey+{acmart.cls}[@ACM@]{nonacm}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using nonacm mode}%\n \\AtBeginDocument{\\@ACM@printacmreffalse}%\n % in 'nonacm' mode we disable the \"ACM Reference Format\"\n % printing by default, but this can be re-enabled by the\n % user using \\settopmatter{printacmref=true}\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Not using nonacm mode}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option nonacm can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{nonacm=false}\n\\define@boolkey+{acmart.cls}[@ACM@]{balance}[true]{}{%\n \\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option balance can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{balance}\n\\define@boolkey+{acmart.cls}[@ACM@]{natbib}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@natbib\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Explicitly selecting natbib mode}%\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Explicitly deselecting natbib mode}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option natbib can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{natbib=true}\n\\define@boolkey+{acmart.cls}[@ACM@]{anonymous}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using anonymous mode}%\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Not using anonymous mode}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option anonymous can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{anonymous=false}\n\\define@boolkey+{acmart.cls}[@ACM@]{timestamp}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@timestamp\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using timestamp mode}%\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Not using timestamp mode}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option timestamp can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{timestamp=false}\n\\define@boolkey+{acmart.cls}[@ACM@]{authordraft}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@authordraft\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using authordraft mode}%\n \\@ACM@timestamptrue\n \\@ACM@reviewtrue\n \\else\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Not using authordraft mode}%\n \\fi}{\\PackageError{\\@classname}{The option authordraft can be either true or\n false}}\n\\ExecuteOptionsX{authordraft=false}\n\\def\\ACM@fontsize{}\n\\DeclareOptionX{9pt}{\\edef\\ACM@fontsize{\\CurrentOption}}\n\\DeclareOptionX{10pt}{\\edef\\ACM@fontsize{\\CurrentOption}}\n\\DeclareOptionX{11pt}{\\edef\\ACM@fontsize{\\CurrentOption}}\n\\DeclareOptionX{12pt}{\\edef\\ACM@fontsize{\\CurrentOption}}\n\\DeclareOptionX{draft}{\\PassOptionsToClass{\\CurrentOption}{amsart}}\n\\DeclareOptionX{*}{\\PassOptionsToClass{\\CurrentOption}{amsart}}\n\\ProcessOptionsX\n\\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Using format \\ACM@format, number \\ACM@format@nr}\n\\newif\\if@ACM@manuscript\n\\newif\\if@ACM@journal\n\\newif\\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip\n\\newif\\if@ACM@sigchiamode\n\\ifnum\\ACM@format@nr=5\\relax % siggraph\n \\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{The format siggraph is now obsolete.\n I am switching to sigconf.}\n \\setkeys{acmart.cls}{format=sigconf}\n\\fi\n\\ifnum\\ACM@format@nr=0\\relax\n \\@ACM@manuscripttrue\n\\else\n \\@ACM@manuscriptfalse\n\\fi\n\\@ACM@sigchiamodefalse\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n \\@ACM@journaltrue\n\\or % acmsmall\n \\@ACM@journaltrue\n\\or % acmlarge\n \\@ACM@journaltrue\n\\or % acmtog\n \\@ACM@journaltrue\n\\or % sigconf\n \\@ACM@journalfalse\n\\or % siggraph\n \\@ACM@journalfalse\n \\or % sigplan\n \\@ACM@journalfalse\n \\or % sigchi\n \\@ACM@journalfalse\n\\or % sigchi-a\n \\@ACM@journalfalse\n \\@ACM@sigchiamodetrue\n\\fi\n\\if@ACM@journal\n \\@ACM@journal@bibstriptrue\n\\else\n \\@ACM@journal@bibstripfalse\n\\fi\n\\ifx\\ACM@fontsize\\@empty\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{9pt}%\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{10pt}%\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{10pt}%\n \\or % acmtog\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{9pt}%\n \\or % sigconf\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{9pt}%\n \\or % siggraph\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{9pt}%\n \\or % sigplan\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{10pt}%\n \\or % sigchi\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{10pt}%\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\def\\ACM@fontsize{10pt}%\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Using fontsize \\ACM@fontsize}\n\\LoadClass[\\ACM@fontsize, reqno]{amsart}\n\\RequirePackage{microtype}\n\\RequirePackage{etoolbox}\n\\RequirePackage{booktabs}\n\\RequirePackage{refcount}\n\\RequirePackage{totpages}\n\\RequirePackage{environ}\n\\if@ACM@manuscript\n\\RequirePackage{setspace}\n\\onehalfspacing\n\\fi\n\\RequirePackage{textcase}\n\\if@ACM@natbib\n \\RequirePackage{natbib}\n \\renewcommand{\\bibsection}{%\n \\section*{\\refname}%\n \\phantomsection\\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\\refname}%\n }\n \\renewcommand{\\bibfont}{\\bibliofont}\n \\renewcommand\\setcitestyle[1]{\n \\@for\\@tempa:=#1\\do\n {\\def\\@tempb{round}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\renewcommand\\NAT@open{(}\\renewcommand\\NAT@close{)}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{square}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\renewcommand\\NAT@open{[}\\renewcommand\\NAT@close{]}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{angle}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\renewcommand\\NAT@open{$<$}\\renewcommand\\NAT@close{$>$}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{curly}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\renewcommand\\NAT@open{\\{}\\renewcommand\\NAT@close{\\}}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{semicolon}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\renewcommand\\NAT@sep{;}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{colon}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\renewcommand\\NAT@sep{;}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{comma}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\renewcommand\\NAT@sep{,}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{authoryear}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\NAT@numbersfalse\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{numbers}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\NAT@numberstrue\\NAT@superfalse\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{super}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\NAT@numberstrue\\NAT@supertrue\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{nobibstyle}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\let\\bibstyle=\\@gobble\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{bibstyle}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\let\\bibstyle=\\@citestyle\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{sort}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\def\\NAT@sort{\\@ne}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{nosort}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\def\\NAT@sort{\\z@}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{compress}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\def\\NAT@cmprs{\\@ne}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{nocompress}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\def\\NAT@cmprs{\\z@}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{sort&compress}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\def\\NAT@sort{\\@ne}\\def\\NAT@cmprs{\\@ne}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{mcite}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\let\\NAT@merge\\@ne\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{merge}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\@ifnum{\\NAT@merge<\\tw@}{\\let\\NAT@merge\\tw@}{}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{elide}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\@ifnum{\\NAT@merge<\\thr@@}{\\let\\NAT@merge\\thr@@}{}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{longnamesfirst}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\NAT@longnamestrue\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{nonamebreak}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\def\\NAT@nmfmt#1{\\mbox{\\NAT@up#1}}\\fi\n \\expandafter\\NAT@find@eq\\@tempa=\\relax\\@nil\n \\if\\@tempc\\relax\\else\n \\expandafter\\NAT@rem@eq\\@tempc\n \\def\\@tempb{open}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\xdef\\NAT@open{\\@tempc}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{close}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\xdef\\NAT@close{\\@tempc}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{aysep}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\xdef\\NAT@aysep{\\@tempc}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{yysep}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\xdef\\NAT@yrsep{\\@tempc}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{notesep}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\xdef\\NAT@cmt{\\@tempc}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{citesep}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n \\xdef\\NAT@sep{\\@tempc}\\fi\n \\fi\n }%\n \\NAT@@setcites\n }\n \\renewcommand\\citestyle[1]{%\n \\ifcsname bibstyle@#1\\endcsname%\n \\csname bibstyle@#1\\endcsname\\let\\bibstyle\\@gobble%\n \\else%\n \\@latex@error{Undefined `#1' citestyle}%\n \\fi\n }%\n\\fi\n\\newcommand{\\bibstyle@acmauthoryear}{%\n \\setcitestyle{%\n authoryear,%\n open={[},close={]},citesep={;},%\n aysep={},yysep={,},%\n notesep={, }}}\n\\newcommand{\\bibstyle@acmnumeric}{%\n \\setcitestyle{%\n numbers,sort&compress,%\n open={[},close={]},citesep={,},%\n notesep={, }}}\n\\if@ACM@natbib\n\\citestyle{acmnumeric}\n\\fi\n\\def\\@startsection#1#2#3#4#5#6{%\n \\if@noskipsec \\leavevmode \\fi\n \\par\n \\@tempskipa #4\\relax\n \\@afterindenttrue\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa <\\z@\n \\@tempskipa -\\@tempskipa \\@afterindentfalse\n \\fi\n \\if@nobreak\n \\everypar{}%\n \\else\n \\addpenalty\\@secpenalty\\addvspace\\@tempskipa\n \\fi\n \\@ifstar\n {\\@ssect{#3}{#4}{#5}{#6}}%\n {\\@dblarg{\\@sect{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}{#5}{#6}}}}\n\\def\\@sect#1#2#3#4#5#6[#7]#8{%\n \\edef\\@toclevel{\\ifnum#2=\\@m 0\\else\\number#2\\fi}%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth\n \\let\\@svsec\\@empty\n \\else\n \\refstepcounter{#1}%\n \\protected@edef\\@svsec{\\@seccntformat{#1}\\relax}%\n \\fi\n \\@tempskipa #5\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n \\begingroup\n #6{%\n \\@hangfrom{\\hskip #3\\relax\\@svsec}%\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M #8\\@@par}%\n \\endgroup\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\@tochangmeasure{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}%\n \\fi\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}%\n \\fi\n #7}%\n \\else\n \\def\\@svsechd{%\n #6{\\hskip #3\\relax\n \\@svsec #8}%\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\@tochangmeasure{\\csname the#1\\endcsname\\space}%\n \\fi\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}%\n \\fi\n #7}}%\n \\fi\n \\@xsect{#5}}\n\\def\\@xsect#1{%\n \\@tempskipa #1\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n \\par \\nobreak\n \\vskip \\@tempskipa\n \\@afterheading\n \\else\n \\@nobreakfalse\n \\global\\@noskipsectrue\n \\everypar{%\n \\if@noskipsec\n \\global\\@noskipsecfalse\n {\\setbox\\z@\\lastbox}%\n \\clubpenalty\\@M\n \\begingroup \\@svsechd \\endgroup\n \\unskip\n \\@tempskipa #1\\relax\n \\hskip -\\@tempskipa\n \\else\n \\clubpenalty \\@clubpenalty\n \\everypar{}%\n \\fi}%\n \\fi\n \\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\@seccntformat#1{\\csname the#1\\endcsname\\quad}\n\\def\\@ssect#1#2#3#4#5{%\n \\@tempskipa #3\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n \\begingroup\n #4{%\n \\@hangfrom{\\hskip #1}%\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M #5\\@@par}%\n \\endgroup\n \\else\n \\def\\@svsechd{#4{\\hskip #1\\relax #5}}%\n \\fi\n \\@xsect{#3}}\n\\def\\@starttoc#1#2{\\begingroup\\makeatletter\n \\setTrue{#1}%\n \\par\\removelastskip\\vskip\\z@skip\n \\@startsection{section}\\@M\\z@{\\linespacing\\@plus\\linespacing}%\n {.5\\linespacing}{\\centering\\contentsnamefont}{#2}%\n \\@input{\\jobname.#1}%\n \\if@filesw\n \\@xp\\newwrite\\csname tf@#1\\endcsname\n \\immediate\\@xp\\openout\\csname tf@#1\\endcsname \\jobname.#1\\relax\n \\fi\n \\global\\@nobreakfalse \\endgroup\n \\addvspace{32\\p@\\@plus14\\p@}%\n}\n\\def\\l@section{\\@tocline{1}{0pt}{1pc}{2pc}{}}\n\\def\\l@subsection{\\@tocline{2}{0pt}{1pc}{3pc}{}}\n\\def\\l@subsubsection{\\@tocline{2}{0pt}{1pc}{5pc}{}}\n\\def\\@makefntext{\\noindent\\@makefnmark}\n\\if@ACM@sigchiamode\n\\long\\def\\@footnotetext#1{\\marginpar{%\n \\reset@font\\small\n \\interlinepenalty\\interfootnotelinepenalty\n \\protected@edef\\@currentlabel{%\n \\csname p@footnote\\endcsname\\@thefnmark\n }%\n \\color@begingroup\n \\@makefntext{%\n \\rule\\z@\\footnotesep\\ignorespaces#1\\@finalstrut\\strutbox}%\n \\color@endgroup}}%\n\\fi\n\\long\\def\\@mpfootnotetext#1{%\n \\global\\setbox\\@mpfootins\\vbox{%\n \\unvbox\\@mpfootins\n \\reset@font\\footnotesize\n \\hsize\\columnwidth\n \\@parboxrestore\n \\protected@edef\\@currentlabel\n {\\csname p@mpfootnote\\endcsname\\@thefnmark}%\n \\color@begingroup\\centering\n \\@makefntext{%\n \\rule\\z@\\footnotesep\\ignorespaces#1\\@finalstrut\\strutbox}%\n \\color@endgroup}}\n\\def\\@makefnmark{\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont\\@thefnmark}}}\n\\let\\@footnotemark@nolink\\@footnotemark\n\\let\\@footnotetext@nolink\\@footnotetext\n\\RequirePackage[bookmarksnumbered,unicode]{hyperref}\n\\pdfstringdefDisableCommands{%\n \\def\\addtocounter#1#2{}%\n \\def\\unskip{}%\n \\def\\textbullet{- }%\n \\def\\textrightarrow{ -> }%\n \\def\\footnotemark{}%\n}\n\\urlstyle{rm}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n\\or % acmlarge\n\\or % acmtog\n\\or % sigconf\n\\or % siggraph\n\\or % sigplan\n \\urlstyle{sf}\n\\or % sigchi\n\\or % sigchi-a\n \\urlstyle{sf}\n\\fi\n\\AtEndPreamble{%\n \\if@ACM@urlbreakonhyphens\n \\def\\do@url@hyp{\\do\\-}%\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@screen\n \\hypersetup{colorlinks,\n linkcolor=ACMPurple,\n citecolor=ACMPurple,\n urlcolor=ACMDarkBlue,\n filecolor=ACMDarkBlue}\n \\else\n \\hypersetup{hidelinks}\n \\fi\n \\hypersetup{pdflang={en},\n pdfdisplaydoctitle}}\n\\if@ACM@natbib\n \\let\\citeN\\cite\n \\let\\cite\\citep\n \\let\\citeANP\\citeauthor\n \\let\\citeNN\\citeyearpar\n \\let\\citeyearNP\\citeyear\n \\let\\citeNP\\citealt\n \\DeclareRobustCommand\\citeA\n {\\begingroup\\NAT@swafalse\n \\let\\NAT@ctype\\@ne\\NAT@partrue\\NAT@fullfalse\\NAT@open\\NAT@citetp}%\n \\providecommand\\newblock{}%\n\\else\n \\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\let\\shortcite\\cite%\n \\providecommand\\citename[1]{#1}}\n\\fi\n\\newcommand\\shortcite[2][]{%\n \\ifNAT@numbers\\cite[#1]{#2}\\else\\citeyearpar[#1]{#2}\\fi}\n\\def\\bibliographystyle#1{%\n \\ifx\\@begindocumenthook\\@undefined\\else\n \\expandafter\\AtBeginDocument\n \\fi\n {\\if@filesw\n \\immediate\\write\\@auxout{\\string\\bibstyle{#1}}%\n \\fi}}\n\\RequirePackage{graphicx}\n\\RequirePackage[prologue]{xcolor}\n\\definecolor[named]{ACMBlue}{cmyk}{1,0.1,0,0.1}\n\\definecolor[named]{ACMYellow}{cmyk}{0,0.16,1,0}\n\\definecolor[named]{ACMOrange}{cmyk}{0,0.42,1,0.01}\n\\definecolor[named]{ACMRed}{cmyk}{0,0.90,0.86,0}\n\\definecolor[named]{ACMLightBlue}{cmyk}{0.49,0.01,0,0}\n\\definecolor[named]{ACMGreen}{cmyk}{0.20,0,1,0.19}\n\\definecolor[named]{ACMPurple}{cmyk}{0.55,1,0,0.15}\n\\definecolor[named]{ACMDarkBlue}{cmyk}{1,0.58,0,0.21}\n\\if@ACM@authordraft\n \\RequirePackage{draftwatermark}\n \\SetWatermarkFontSize{0.5in}\n \\SetWatermarkColor[gray]{.9}\n \\SetWatermarkText{\\parbox{12em}{\\centering\n Unpublished working draft.\\\\\n Not for distribution.}}\n\\fi\n\\RequirePackage{geometry}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n \\geometry{letterpaper,head=13pt,\n marginparwidth=6pc,heightrounded}%\n\\or % acmsmall\n \\geometry{twoside=true,\n includeheadfoot, head=13pt, foot=2pc,\n paperwidth=6.75in, paperheight=10in,\n top=58pt, bottom=44pt, inner=46pt, outer=46pt,\n marginparwidth=2pc,heightrounded\n }%\n\\or % acmlarge\n \\geometry{twoside=true, head=13pt, foot=2pc,\n paperwidth=8.5in, paperheight=11in,\n includeheadfoot,\n top=78pt, bottom=114pt, inner=81pt, outer=81pt,\n marginparwidth=4pc,heightrounded\n }%\n\\or % acmtog\n \\geometry{twoside=true, head=13pt, foot=2pc,\n paperwidth=8.5in, paperheight=11in,\n includeheadfoot, columnsep=24pt,\n top=52pt, bottom=75pt, inner=52pt, outer=52pt,\n marginparwidth=2pc,heightrounded\n }%\n\\or % sigconf\n \\geometry{twoside=true, head=13pt,\n paperwidth=8.5in, paperheight=11in,\n includeheadfoot, columnsep=2pc,\n top=57pt, bottom=73pt, inner=54pt, outer=54pt,\n marginparwidth=2pc,heightrounded\n }%\n\\or % siggraph\n \\geometry{twoside=true, head=13pt,\n paperwidth=8.5in, paperheight=11in,\n includeheadfoot, columnsep=2pc,\n top=57pt, bottom=73pt, inner=54pt, outer=54pt,\n marginparwidth=2pc,heightrounded\n }%\n\\or % sigplan\n \\geometry{twoside=true, head=13pt,\n paperwidth=8.5in, paperheight=11in,\n includeheadfoot=false, columnsep=2pc,\n top=1in, bottom=1in, inner=0.75in, outer=0.75in,\n marginparwidth=2pc,heightrounded\n }%\n\\or % sigchi\n \\geometry{twoside=true, head=13pt,\n paperwidth=8.5in, paperheight=11in,\n includeheadfoot, columnsep=2pc,\n top=66pt, bottom=73pt, inner=54pt, outer=54pt,\n marginparwidth=2pc,heightrounded\n }%\n\\or % sigchi-a\n \\geometry{twoside=false, head=13pt,\n paperwidth=11in, paperheight=8.5in,\n includeheadfoot, marginparsep=72pt,\n marginparwidth=170pt, columnsep=20pt,\n top=72pt, bottom=72pt, left=314pt, right=72pt\n }%\n \\@mparswitchfalse\n \\reversemarginpar\n\\fi\n\\setlength\\parindent{10\\p@}\n\\setlength\\parskip{\\z@}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n\\or % acmlarge\n\\or % acmtog\n \\setlength\\parindent{9\\p@}%\n\\or % sigconf\n\\or % siggraph\n\\or % sigplan\n\\or % sigchi\n\\or % sigchi-a\n\\fi\n\\setlength\\normalparindent{\\parindent}\n\\def\\copyrightpermissionfootnoterule{\\kern-3\\p@\n \\hrule \\@width \\columnwidth \\kern 2.6\\p@}\n\\RequirePackage{manyfoot}\n\\SelectFootnoteRule[2]{copyrightpermission}\n\\DeclareNewFootnote{authorsaddresses}\n\\SelectFootnoteRule[2]{copyrightpermission}\n\\DeclareNewFootnote{copyrightpermission}\n\\def\\footnoterule{\\kern-3\\p@\n \\hrule \\@width 4pc \\kern 2.6\\p@}\n\\def\\endminipage{%\n \\par\n \\unskip\n \\ifvoid\\@mpfootins\\else\n \\vskip\\skip\\@mpfootins\n \\normalcolor\n \\unvbox\\@mpfootins\n \\fi\n \\@minipagefalse\n \\color@endgroup\n \\egroup\n \\expandafter\\@iiiparbox\\@mpargs{\\unvbox\\@tempboxa}}\n\\def\\@textbottom{\\vskip \\z@ \\@plus 1pt}\n\\let\\@texttop\\relax\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n\\or % acmlarge\n\\or % acmtog\n \\flushbottom\n\\or % sigconf\n \\flushbottom\n\\or % siggraph\n \\flushbottom\n\\or % sigplan\n \\flushbottom\n\\or % sigchi\n \\flushbottom\n\\or % sigchi-a\n\\fi\n\\RequirePackage{iftex}\n\\ifPDFTeX\n\\input{glyphtounicode}\n\\pdfglyphtounicode{f_f}{FB00}\n\\pdfglyphtounicode{f_f_i}{FB03}\n\\pdfglyphtounicode{f_f_l}{FB04}\n\\pdfglyphtounicode{f_i}{FB01}\n\\pdfglyphtounicode{t_t}{0074 0074}\n\\pdfglyphtounicode{f_t}{0066 0074}\n\\pdfglyphtounicode{T_h}{0054 0068}\n\\pdfgentounicode=1\n\\fi\n\\RequirePackage{cmap}\n\\newif\\if@ACM@newfonts\n\\@ACM@newfontstrue\n\\IfFileExists{libertine.sty}{}{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{You do not\n have the libertine package installed. Please upgrade your\n TeX}\\@ACM@newfontsfalse}\n\\IfFileExists{zi4.sty}{}{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{You do not\n have the zi4 package installed. Please upgrade your\n TeX}\\@ACM@newfontsfalse}\n\\IfFileExists{newtxmath.sty}{}{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{You do not\n have the newtxmath package installed. Please upgrade your\n TeX}\\@ACM@newfontsfalse}\n\\if@ACM@newfonts\n \\RequirePackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\\ifxetex\n \\RequirePackage[tt=false]{libertine}\n \\setmonofont{inconsolata}\n\\else\n \\RequirePackage[tt=false, type1=true]{libertine}\n\\fi\n\\RequirePackage[varqu]{zi4}\n\\RequirePackage[libertine]{newtxmath}\n\\fi\n\\let\\liningnums\\@undefined\n\\AtEndPreamble{%\n \\DeclareTextFontCommand{\\liningnums}{\\libertineLF}}\n\\if@ACM@sigchiamode\n \\renewcommand{\\familydefault}{\\sfdefault}\n\\fi\n\\newif\\if@Description@present\n\\@Description@presenttrue\n\\newif\\if@undescribed@images\n\\@undescribed@imagesfalse\n\\newcommand\\Description[2][]{\\global\\@Description@presenttrue\\ignorespaces}\n\\AtEndDocument{\\if@undescribed@images\n \\ClassWarningNoLine{\\@classname}{Some images may lack descriptions}\\fi}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{figure}{\\@Description@presentfalse\n \\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{figure*}{\\@Description@presentfalse\n \\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtEndEnvironment{figure}{\\if@Description@present\\else\n \\global\\@undescribed@imagestrue\n \\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{A possible image without description}\\fi}\n\\AtEndEnvironment{figure*}{\\if@Description@present\\else\n \\global\\@undescribed@imagestrue\n \\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{A possible image without description}\\fi}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{table}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{table*}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{algorithm}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{algorithm*}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{lstlisting}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\\AtBeginEnvironment{lstlisting*}{\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig}\n\n\\RequirePackage{caption, float}\n\\captionsetup[table]{position=top}\n\\if@ACM@journal\n \\captionsetup{labelfont={sf, small},\n textfont={sf, small}, margin=\\z@}\n \\captionsetup[figure]{name={Fig.}}\n\\else\n \\captionsetup{labelfont={bf},\n textfont={bf}, labelsep=colon, margin=\\z@}\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\or % acmtog\n \\or % sigconf\n \\or % siggraph\n \\captionsetup{textfont={it}}\n \\or % sigplan\n \\captionsetup{labelfont={bf},\n textfont={normalfont}, labelsep=period, margin=\\z@}\n \\or % sigchi\n \\captionsetup[figure]{labelfont={bf, small},\n textfont={bf, small}}\n \\captionsetup[table]{labelfont={bf, small},\n textfont={bf, small}}\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\captionsetup[figure]{labelfont={bf, small},\n textfont={bf, small}}\n \\captionsetup[table]{labelfont={bf, small},\n textfont={bf, small}}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\\newfloat{sidebar}{}{sbar}\n\\floatname{sidebar}{Sidebar}\n\\renewenvironment{sidebar}{\\Collect@Body\\@sidebar}{}\n\\long\\def\\@sidebar#1{\\bgroup\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig\\captionsetup{type=sidebar}%\n \\marginpar{\\small#1}\\egroup}\n\\newenvironment{marginfigure}{\\Collect@Body\\@marginfigure}{}\n\\long\\def\\@marginfigure#1{\\bgroup\n \\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig\n \\captionsetup{type=figure}%\n \\marginpar{\\@Description@presentfalse\\centering\n \\small#1\\if@Description@present\\else\n \\global\\@undescribed@imagestrue\n \\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{A possible image without description}\n \\fi}%\n \\egroup}\n\\newenvironment{margintable}{\\Collect@Body\\@margintable}{}\n\\long\\def\\@margintable#1{\\bgroup\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig\\captionsetup{type=table}%\n \\marginpar{\\centering\\small#1}\\egroup}\n\\newdimen\\fulltextwidth\n\\fulltextwidth=\\dimexpr(\\textwidth+\\marginparwidth+\\marginparsep)\n\\if@ACM@sigchiamode\n\\def\\@dblfloat{\\bgroup\\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig\\columnwidth=\\fulltextwidth\n \\let\\@endfloatbox\\@endwidefloatbox\n \\def\\@fpsadddefault{\\def\\@fps{tp}}%\n \\@float}\n\\fi\n\\if@ACM@sigchiamode\n\\def\\end@dblfloat{%\n \\end@float\\egroup}\n\\fi\n\\def\\@endwidefloatbox{%\n \\par\\vskip\\z@skip\n \\@minipagefalse\n \\outer@nobreak\n \\egroup\n \\color@endbox\n \\global\\setbox\\@currbox=\\vbox{\\moveleft\n \\dimexpr(\\fulltextwidth-\\textwidth)\\box\\@currbox}%\n \\wd\\@currbox=\\textwidth\n}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n\\or % acmlarge\n\\or % acmtog\n\\or % sigconf\n\\or % siggraph\n\\or % sigplan\n\\def\\labelenumi{\\theenumi.}\n\\def\\labelenumii{\\theenumii.}\n\\def\\labelenumiii{\\theenumiii.}\n\\def\\labelenumiv{\\theenumiv.}\n\\or % sigchi\n\\or % sigchi-a\n\\fi\n\\newdimen\\@ACM@labelwidth\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\setlength\\labelsep{4pt}\n \\setlength{\\@ACM@labelwidth}{6.5pt}\n\n %% First-level list: when beginning after the first line of an\n %% indented paragraph or ending before an indented paragraph, labels\n %% should not hang to the left of the preceding/following text.\n \\setlength\\leftmargini{\\z@}\n \\addtolength\\leftmargini{\\parindent}\n \\addtolength\\leftmargini{2\\labelsep}\n \\addtolength\\leftmargini{\\@ACM@labelwidth}\n\n %% Second-level and higher lists.\n \\setlength\\leftmarginii{\\z@}\n \\addtolength\\leftmarginii{0.5\\labelsep}\n \\addtolength\\leftmarginii{\\@ACM@labelwidth}\n \\setlength\\leftmarginiii{\\leftmarginii}\n \\setlength\\leftmarginiv{\\leftmarginiii}\n \\setlength\\leftmarginv{\\leftmarginiv}\n \\setlength\\leftmarginvi{\\leftmarginv}\n \\@listi}\n\\newskip\\listisep\n\\listisep\\smallskipamount\n\\def\\@listI{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\labelwidth\\leftmargini \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\listparindent\\z@\n \\topsep\\listisep}\n\\let\\@listi\\@listI\n\\def\\@listii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginii \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep\\z@skip}\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiii \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listiv{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiv \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listv{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginv \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listvi{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginvi\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginvi \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\renewcommand{\\descriptionlabel}[1]{\\upshape\\bfseries #1}\n\\renewenvironment{description}{\\list{}{%\n \\labelwidth\\@ACM@labelwidth\n \\let\\makelabel\\descriptionlabel}%\n}{\n \\endlist\n}\n\\let\\enddescription=\\endlist % for efficiency\n\\newif\\if@ACM@maketitle@typeset\n\\@ACM@maketitle@typesetfalse\n\\define@choicekey*+{ACM}{acmJournal}[\\@journalCode\\@journalCode@nr]{%\n CIE,%\n CSUR,%\n DGOV,%\n DTRAP,%\n HEALTH,%\n IMWUT,%\n JACM,%\n JDIQ,%\n JEA,%\n JERIC,%\n JETC,%\n JOCCH,%\n PACMCGIT,%\n PACMHCI,%\n PACMPL,%\n POMACS,%\n TAAS,%\n TACCESS,%\n TACO,%\n TALG,%\n TALLIP,%\n TAP,%\n TCPS,%\n TDS,%\n TEAC,%\n TECS,%\n TELO,%\n THRI,%\n TIIS,%\n TIOT,%\n TISSEC,%\n TIST,%\n TKDD,%\n TMIS,%\n TOCE,%\n TOCHI,%\n TOCL,%\n TOCS,%\n TOCT,%\n TODAES,%\n TODS,%\n TOG,%\n TOIS,%\n TOIT,%\n TOMACS,%\n TOMM,%\n TOMPECS,%\n TOMS,%\n TOPC,%\n TOPS,%\n TOPLAS,%\n TOS,%\n TOSEM,%\n TOSN,%\n TQC,%\n TRETS,%\n TSAS,%\n TSC,%\n TSLP,%\n TWEB,%\n FACMP%\n}{%\n\\ifcase\\@journalCode@nr\n\\relax % CIE\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Computers in Entertainment}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Comput. Entertain.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1544-3574}%\n\\or % CSUR\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Computing Surveys}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Comput. Surv.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{0360-0300}%\n\\or % DGOV\n \\def\\@journalName{Digital Government: Research and Practice}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Digit. Gov. Res. Pract.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2639-0175}%\n\\or % DTRAP\n \\def\\@journalName{Digital Threats: Research and Practice}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Digit. Threat. Res. Pract.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2576-5337}%\n\\or % HEALTH\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Comput. Healthcare}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2637-8051}%\n\\or % IMWUT\n \\def\\@journalName{Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile,\n Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2474-9567}%\n \\@ACM@screentrue\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using screen mode due to \\@journalCode}%\n\\or % JACM\n \\def\\@journalName{Journal of the ACM}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{J. ACM}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{0004-5411}%\n\\or % JDIQ\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM J. Data Inform. Quality}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1936-1955}%\n\\or % JEA\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM J. Exp. Algor.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1084-6654}%\n\\or % JERIC\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM J. Edu. Resources in Comput.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1073-0516}%\n\\or % JETC\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1550-4832}%\n\\or % JOCCH\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM J. Comput. Cult. Herit.}%\n\\or % PACMCGIT\n \\def\\@journalName{Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Proc. ACM Comput. Graph. Interact. Tech.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2577-6193}%\n \\@ACM@screentrue\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using screen mode due to \\@journalCode}%\n\\or % PACMHCI\n \\def\\@journalName{Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2573-0142}%\n \\@ACM@screentrue\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using screen mode due to \\@journalCode}%\n\\or % PACMPL\n \\def\\@journalName{Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Proc. ACM Program. Lang.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2475-1421}%\n \\@ACM@screentrue\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using screen mode due to \\@journalCode}%\n\\or % POMACS\n \\def\\@journalName{Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{Proc. ACM Meas. Anal. Comput. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2476-1249}%\n \\@ACM@screentrue\n \\PackageInfo{\\@classname}{Using screen mode due to \\@journalCode}%\n\\or % TAAS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Autonom. Adapt. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1556-4665}%\n\\or % TACCESS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Access. Comput.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1936-7228}%\n\\or % TACO\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Arch. Code Optim.}%\n\\or % TALG\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Algorithms}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Algor.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1549-6325}%\n\\or % TALLIP\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Asian Low-Resour. Lang. Inf. Process.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2375-4699}%\n\\or % TAP\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Applied Perception}%\n\\or % TCPS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems}%\n\\or % TDS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM/IMS Transactions on Data Science}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM/IMS Trans. Data Sci.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2577-3224}%\n\\or % TEAC\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation}%\n\\or % TECS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Embedd. Comput. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1539-9087}%\n\\or % TELO\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Evol. Learn.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2688-3007}%\n\\or % THRI\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Hum.-Robot Interact.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2573-9522}%\n\\or % TIIS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2160-6455}%\n\\or % TIOT\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Internet of Things}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Internet Things}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2577-6207}%\n\\or % TISSEC\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Information and System Security}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Info. Syst. Sec.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1094-9224}%\n\\or % TIST\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2157-6904}%\n\\or % TKDD\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1556-4681}%\n\\or % TMIS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Manag. Inform. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2158-656X}%\n\\or % TOCE\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Computing Education}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Comput. Educ.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1946-6226}%\n\\or % TOCHI\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1073-0516}%\n\\or % TOCL\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Computational Logic}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Comput. Logic}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1529-3785}%\n\\or % TOCS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Computer Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Comput. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{0734-2071}%\n\\or % TOCT\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Computation Theory}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Comput. Theory}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1942-3454}%\n\\or % TODAES\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Des. Autom. Electron. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1084-4309}%\n\\or % TODS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Database Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Datab. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{0362-5915}%\n\\or % TOG\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Graphics}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Graph.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{0730-0301}\n\\or % TOIS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Information Systems}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1046-8188}%\n\\or % TOIT\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Internet Technology}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Internet Technol.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1533-5399}%\n\\or % TOMACS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul.}%\n\\or % TOMM\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1551-6857}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{0100}%\n\\or % TOMPECS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Model. Perform. Eval. Comput. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2376-3639}%\n\\or % TOMS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Math. Softw.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{0098-3500}%\n\\or % TOPC\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Parallel Computing}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Parallel Comput.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1539-9087}%\n\\or % TOPS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Priv. Sec.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2471-2566}%\n\\or % TOPLAS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{0164-0925}%\n\\or % TOS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Storage}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Storage}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1553-3077}%\n\\or % TOSEM\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1049-331X}%\n\\or % TOSN\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Sensor Netw.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1550-4859}%\n\\or % TQC\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Quantum Comput.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2643-6817}%\n\\or % TRETS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Reconfig. Technol. Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1936-7406}%\n\\or % TSAS\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Spatial Algorithms Syst.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2374-0353}%\n\\or % TSC\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Social Computing}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Soc. Comput.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{2469-7818}%\n\\or % TSLP\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Speech Lang. Process.}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1550-4875}%\n\\or % TWEB\n \\def\\@journalName{ACM Transactions on the Web}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Trans. Web}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{1559-1131}%\n\\else % FACMP, a dummy journal\n \\def\\@journalName{Forthcoming ACM Publication}%\n \\def\\@journalNameShort{ACM Forthcoming}%\n \\def\\@permissionCodeOne{XXXX-XXXX}%\n\\fi\n\\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Using journal code \\@journalCode}%\n}{%\n \\ClassError{\\@classname}{Incorrect journal #1}%\n}%\n\\def\\acmJournal#1{\\setkeys{ACM}{acmJournal=#1}%\n \\global\\@ACM@journal@bibstriptrue}\n\\def\\@journalCode@nr{0}\n\\def\\@journalName{}%\n\\def\\@journalNameShort{\\@journalName}%\n\\def\\@permissionCodeOne{XXXX-XXXX}%\n\\def\\@permissionCodeTwo{}%\n\\newcommand\\acmConference[4][]{%\n \\gdef\\acmConference@shortname{#1}%\n \\gdef\\acmConference@name{#2}%\n \\gdef\\acmConference@date{#3}%\n \\gdef\\acmConference@venue{#4}%\n \\ifx\\acmConference@shortname\\@empty\n \\gdef\\acmConference@shortname{#2}%\n \\fi\n \\global\\@ACM@journal@bibstripfalse\n}\n\\if@ACM@journal\\else\n\\acmConference[Conference'17]{ACM Conference}{July 2017}{Washington,\n DC, USA}%\n\\fi\n\\def\\acmBooktitle#1{\\gdef\\@acmBooktitle{#1}}\n\\acmBooktitle{Proceedings of \\acmConference@name\n \\ifx\\acmConference@name\\acmConference@shortname\\else\n \\ (\\acmConference@shortname)\\fi}\n\\def\\@editorsAbbrev{(Ed.)}\n\\def\\@acmEditors{}\n\\def\\editor#1{\\ifx\\@acmEditors\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@acmEditors{#1}%\n \\else\n \\gdef\\@editorsAbbrev{(Eds.)}%\n \\g@addto@macro\\@acmEditors{\\and#1}%\n\\fi}\n\\def\\subtitle#1{\\def\\@subtitle{#1}}\n\\subtitle{}\n\\newcount\\num@authorgroups\n\\num@authorgroups=0\\relax\n\\newcount\\num@authors\n\\num@authors=0\\relax\n\\newif\\if@insideauthorgroup\n\\@insideauthorgroupfalse\n\\renewcommand\\author[2][]{%\n \\IfSubStr{#2}{,}{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{Do not put several\n authors in the same \\string\\author\\space macro!}}{}%\n \\global\\advance\\num@authors by 1\\relax\n \\if@insideauthorgroup\\else\n \\global\\advance\\num@authorgroups by 1\\relax\n \\global\\@insideauthorgrouptrue\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\addresses\\@empty\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\n \\gdef\\addresses{\\@author{Anonymous Author(s)%\n \\ifx\\@acmSubmissionID\\@empty\\else\\\\Submission Id:\n \\@acmSubmissionID\\fi}}%\n \\gdef\\authors{Anonymous Author(s)}%\n \\else\n \\gdef\\addresses{\\@author{#2}}%\n \\gdef\\authors{#2}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\addresses{\\and\\@author{#2}}%\n \\g@addto@macro\\authors{\\and#2}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\n \\ifx\\shortauthors\\@empty\n \\gdef\\shortauthors{Anon.\n \\ifx\\@acmSubmissionID\\@empty\\else Submission Id:\n \\@acmSubmissionID\\fi}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\def\\@tempa{#1}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty\n \\ifx\\shortauthors\\@empty\n \\gdef\\shortauthors{#2}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\shortauthors{\\and#2}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\ifx\\shortauthors\\@empty\n \\gdef\\shortauthors{#1}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\shortauthors{\\and#1}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi}\n\\newcommand{\\affiliation}[2][]{%\n \\global\\@insideauthorgroupfalse\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\addresses{\\affiliation{#1}{#2}}%\n \\fi}\n\\define@boolkey+{@ACM@affiliation@}[@ACM@affiliation@]{obeypunctuation}%\n[true]{}{\\ClassError{\\@classname}{The option obeypunctuation can be either true or false}}\n\\def\\additionalaffiliation#1{\\authornote{\\@additionalaffiliation{#1}}}\n\\def\\@additionalaffiliation#1{\\bgroup\n \\def\\position##1{\\ignorespaces}%\n \\def\\institution##1{##1\\ignorespaces}%\n \\def\\department{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@department}{\\@department[]}}%\n \\def\\@department[##1]##2{\\unskip, ##2\\ignorespaces}%\n \\let\\streetaddress\\position\n \\let\\city\\position\n \\let\\state\\position\n \\let\\postcode\\position\n \\let\\country\\position\n Also with #1\\unskip.\\egroup}\n\\renewcommand{\\email}[2][]{%\n \\IfSubStr{#2}{,}{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{Do not put several\n addresses in the same \\string\\email\\space macro!}}{}%\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\addresses{\\email{#1}{#2}}%\n \\fi}\n\\def\\orcid#1{\\unskip\\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\authorsaddresses#1{\\def\\@authorsaddresses{#1}}\n\\authorsaddresses{\\@mkauthorsaddresses}\n\\def\\@titlenotes{}\n\\def\\titlenote#1{%\n \\g@addto@macro\\@title{\\footnotemark}%\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\n \\g@addto@macro\\@titlenotes{%\n \\stepcounter{footnote}\\footnotetext{Title note}}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\@titlenotes{\\stepcounter{footnote}\\footnotetext{#1}}%\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@subtitlenotes{}\n\\def\\subtitlenote#1{%\n \\g@addto@macro\\@subtitle{\\footnotemark}%\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\n \\g@addto@macro\\@subtitlenotes{%\n \\stepcounter{footnote}\\footnotetext{Subtitle note}}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\@subtitlenotes{%\n \\stepcounter{footnote}\\footnotetext{#1}}%\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@authornotes{}\n\\def\\authornote#1{%\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\addresses{\\@authornotemark}%\n \\g@addto@macro\\@authornotes{%\n \\stepcounter{footnote}\\footnotetext{#1}}%\n \\fi}\n\\newcommand\\authornotemark[1][\\relax]{%\n \\ifx#1\\relax\\relax\\relax\n \\g@addto@macro\\addresses{\\@authornotemark}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\addresses{\\@@authornotemark{#1}}%\n \\fi}\n\\def\\acmVolume#1{\\def\\@acmVolume{#1}}\n\\acmVolume{1}\n\\def\\acmNumber#1{\\def\\@acmNumber{#1}}\n\\acmNumber{1}\n\\def\\acmArticle#1{\\def\\@acmArticle{#1}}\n\\acmArticle{}\n\\def\\acmArticleSeq#1{\\def\\@acmArticleSeq{#1}}\n\\acmArticleSeq{\\@acmArticle}\n\\def\\acmYear#1{\\def\\@acmYear{#1}}\n\\acmYear{\\the\\year}\n\\def\\acmMonth#1{\\def\\@acmMonth{#1}}\n\\acmMonth{\\the\\month}\n\\def\\@acmPubDate{\\ifcase\\@acmMonth\\or\n January\\or February\\or March\\or April\\or May\\or June\\or\n July\\or August\\or September\\or October\\or November\\or\n December\\fi~\\@acmYear}\n\\def\\acmPrice#1{\\def\\@acmPrice{#1}}\n\\acmPrice{15.00}\n\\def\\acmSubmissionID#1{\\def\\@acmSubmissionID{#1}}\n\\acmSubmissionID{}\n\\def\\acmISBN#1{\\def\\@acmISBN{#1}}\n\\acmISBN{978-x-xxxx-xxxx-x/YY/MM}\n\\def\\acmDOI#1{\\def\\@acmDOI{#1}}\n\\acmDOI{10.1145/nnnnnnn.nnnnnnn}\n\\newif\\if@ACM@badge\n\\@ACM@badgefalse\n\\newlength\\@ACM@badge@width\n\\setlength\\@ACM@badge@width{5pc}\n\\newlength\\@ACM@title@width\n\\newlength\\@ACM@badge@skip\n\\setlength\\@ACM@badge@skip{1pc}\n\\newcommand\\acmBadgeR[2][]{\\@ACM@badgetrue\n \\def\\@acmBadgeR@url{#1}%\n \\def\\@acmBadgeR@image{#2}}\n\\def\\@acmBadgeR@url{}\n\\def\\@acmBadgeR@image{}\n\\newcommand\\acmBadgeL[2][]{\\@ACM@badgetrue\n \\def\\@acmBadgeL@url{#1}%\n \\def\\@acmBadgeL@image{#2}}\n\\def\\@acmBadgeL@url{}\n\\def\\@acmBadgeL@image{}\n\\def\\startPage#1{\\def\\@startPage{#1}}\n\\startPage{}\n\\def\\terms#1{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{The command \\string\\terms{} is\n obsolete. I am going to ignore it}}\n\\def\\keywords#1{\\def\\@keywords{#1}}\n\\let\\@keywords\\@empty\n\\AtEndDocument{\\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\\ifx\\@keywords\\@empty\n \\ifnum\\getrefnumber{TotPages}>2\\relax\n \\ClassWarningNoLine{\\@classname}{ACM keywords are mandatory\n for papers over two pages}%\n \\fi\\fi\\fi}\n\\renewenvironment{abstract}{\\Collect@Body\\@saveabstract}{}\n\\long\\def\\@saveabstract#1{\\if@ACM@maketitle@typeset\n \\ClassError{\\@classname}{Abstract must be defined before maketitle\n command. Please move it!}\\fi\n \\long\\gdef\\@abstract{#1}}\n\\@saveabstract{}\n\\long\\def\\@lempty{}\n\\define@boolkey+{@ACM@topmatter@}[@ACM@]{printccs}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@printccs\n \\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Printing CCS}%\n \\else\n \\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Suppressing CCS}%\n \\fi}{\\ClassError{\\@classname}{The option printccs can be either true or false}}\n\\define@boolkey+{@ACM@topmatter@}[@ACM@]{printacmref}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@printacmref\n \\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Printing bibformat}%\n \\else\n \\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Suppressing bibformat}%\n \\fi}{\\ClassError{\\@classname}{The option printacmref can be either true or false}}\n\\AtEndDocument{\\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\\if@ACM@printacmref\\else\n \\ifnum\\getrefnumber{TotPages}>1\\relax\n \\ClassWarningNoLine{\\@classname}{ACM reference format is mandatory\n for papers over one page}%\n \\fi\\fi\\fi}\n\\define@boolkey+{@ACM@topmatter@}[@ACM@]{printfolios}[true]{%\n \\if@ACM@printfolios\n \\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Printing folios}%\n \\else\n \\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Suppressing folios}%\n \\fi}{\\ClassError{\\@classname}{The option printfolios can be either true or false}}\n\\define@cmdkey{@ACM@topmatter@}[@ACM@]{authorsperrow}[0]{%\n \\IfInteger{#1}{\\ClassInfo{\\@classname}{Setting authorsperrow to\n #1}}{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{The parameter authorsperrow must be\n numerical. Ignoring the input #1}\\gdef\\@ACM@authorsperrow{0}}}\n\\def\\settopmatter#1{\\setkeys{@ACM@topmatter@}{#1}}\n\\settopmatter{printccs=true, printacmref=true}\n\\if@ACM@manuscript\n \\settopmatter{printfolios=true}\n\\else\n \\if@ACM@journal\n \\settopmatter{printfolios=true}\n \\else\n \\settopmatter{printfolios=false}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\\settopmatter{authorsperrow=0}\n\\def\\@received{}\n\\newcommand\\received[2][]{\\def\\@tempa{#1}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty\n \\ifx\\@received\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@received{Received #2}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro{\\@received}{; revised #2}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\ifx\\@received\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@received{#1 #2}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro{\\@received}{; #1 #2}%\n \\fi\n \\fi}\n\\AtEndDocument{%\n \\ifx\\@received\\@empty\\else\n \\par\\bigskip\\noindent\\small\\normalfont\\@received\\par\n \\fi}\n\\RequirePackage{comment}\n\\excludecomment{CCSXML}\n\\let\\@concepts\\@empty\n\\newcounter{@concepts}\n\\newcommand\\ccsdesc[2][100]{%\n \\ccsdesc@parse#1~#2~~\\ccsdesc@parse@end}\n\\def\\textrightarrow{$\\rightarrow$}\n\\def\\ccsdesc@parse#1~#2~#3~{%\n \\stepcounter{@concepts}%\n \\expandafter\\ifx\\csname CCS@General@#2\\endcsname\\relax\n \\expandafter\\gdef\\csname CCS@General@#2\\endcsname{\\textbullet\\\n \\textbf{#2}}%\n \\expandafter\\gdef\\csname CCS@Punctuation@#2\\endcsname{; }%\n \\expandafter\\gdef\\csname CCS@Specific@#2\\endcsname{}%\n \\g@addto@macro{\\@concepts}{\\csname CCS@General@#2\\endcsname\n \\csname CCS@Punctuation@#2\\endcsname\n \\csname CCS@Specific@#2\\endcsname}%\n \\fi\n \\ifx#3\\relax\\relax\\else\n \\expandafter\\gdef\\csname CCS@Punctuation@#2\\endcsname{\n \\textrightarrow\\ }%\n \\expandafter\\g@addto@macro\\expandafter{\\csname CCS@Specific@#2\\endcsname}{%\n \\addtocounter{@concepts}{-1}%\n \\ifnum#1>499\\textbf{#3}\\else\n \\ifnum#1>299\\textit{#3}\\else\n #3\\fi\\fi\\ifnum\\value{@concepts}=0.\\else; \\fi}%\n \\fi\n\\ccsdesc@parse@finish}\n\\AtEndDocument{\\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\\ifx\\@concepts\\@empty\\relax\n \\ifnum\\getrefnumber{TotPages}>2\\relax\n \\ClassWarningNoLine{\\@classname}{CCS concepts are mandatory\n for papers over two pages}%\n \\fi\\fi\\fi}\n\\def\\ccsdesc@parse@finish#1\\ccsdesc@parse@end{}\n\\newif\\if@printcopyright\n\\@printcopyrighttrue\n\\newif\\if@printpermission\n\\@printpermissiontrue\n\\newif\\if@acmowned\n\\@acmownedtrue\n\\define@choicekey*{ACM@}{acmcopyrightmode}[%\n \\acm@copyrightinput\\acm@copyrightmode]{none,%\n acmcopyright,acmlicensed,rightsretained,%\n usgov,usgovmixed,cagov,cagovmixed,licensedusgovmixed,%\n licensedcagov,licensedcagovmixed,othergov,licensedothergov,%\n iw3c2w3,iw3c2w3g}{%\n \\@printpermissiontrue\n \\@printcopyrighttrue\n \\@acmownedtrue\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=0\\relax % none\n \\@printpermissionfalse\n \\@printcopyrightfalse\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=2\\relax % acmlicensed\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=3\\relax % rightsretained\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\AtBeginDocument{\\acmPrice{}}%\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=4\\relax % usgov\n \\@printpermissiontrue\n \\@printcopyrightfalse\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\AtBeginDocument{\\acmPrice{}}%\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=6\\relax % cagov\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=8\\relax % licensedusgovmixed\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=9\\relax % licensedcagov\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=10\\relax % licensedcagovmixed\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=11\\relax % othergov\n \\@acmownedtrue\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=12\\relax % licensedothergov\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=13\\relax % iw3c2w3\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\AtBeginDocument{\\acmPrice{}}%\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\acm@copyrightmode=14\\relax % iw3c2w3g\n \\@acmownedfalse\n \\AtBeginDocument{\\acmPrice{}}%\n \\fi}\n\\def\\setcopyright#1{\\setkeys{ACM@}{acmcopyrightmode=#1}}\n\\setcopyright{acmcopyright}\n\\def\\@copyrightowner{%\n \\ifcase\\acm@copyrightmode\\relax % none\n \\or % acmcopyright\n Association for Computing Machinery.\n \\or % acmlicensed\n Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to\n ACM\\@.\n \\or % rightsretained\n Copyright held by the owner/author(s).\n \\or % usgov\n \\or % usgovmixed\n Association for Computing Machinery.\n \\or % cagov\n Crown in Right of Canada.\n \\or %cagovmixed\n Association for Computing Machinery.\n \\or %licensedusgovmixed\n Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to\n ACM\\@.\n \\or % licensedcagov\n Crown in Right of Canada. Publication rights licensed to\n ACM\\@.\n \\or %licensedcagovmixed\n Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to\n ACM\\@.\n \\or % othergov\n Association for Computing Machinery.\n \\or % licensedothergov\n Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to\n ACM\\@.\n \\or % ic2w3www\n IW3C2 (International World Wide Web Conference Committee), published\n under Creative Commons CC-BY~4.0 License.\n \\or % ic2w3wwwgoogle\n IW3C2 (International World Wide Web Conference Committee), published\n under Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND~4.0 License.\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@formatdoi#1{\\url{https://doi.org/#1}}\n\\def\\@copyrightpermission{%\n \\ifcase\\acm@copyrightmode\\relax % none\n \\or % acmcopyright\n Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this\n work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided\n that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial\n advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on\n the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by\n others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is\n permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to\n redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission\n and\\hspace*{.5pt}/or a fee. Request permissions from\n permissions@acm.org.\n \\or % acmlicensed\n Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this\n work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided\n that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial\n advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on\n the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by\n others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit\n is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers\n or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission\n and\\hspace*{.5pt}/or a fee. Request permissions from\n permissions@acm.org.\n \\or % rightsretained\n Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work\n for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that\n copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage\n and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first\n page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be\n honored. For all other uses, contact the\n owner\\hspace*{.5pt}/author(s).\n \\or % usgov\n This paper is authored by an employee(s) of the United States\n Government and is in the public domain. Non-exclusive copying or\n redistribution is allowed, provided that the article citation is\n given and the authors and agency are clearly identified as its\n source.\n \\or % usgovmixed\n ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored\n by an employee, contractor, or affiliate of the United States\n government. As such, the United States government retains a\n nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this\n article, or to allow others to do so, for government purposes only.\n \\or % cagov\n This article was authored by employees of the Government of Canada.\n As such, the Canadian government retains all interest in the\n copyright to this work and grants to ACM a nonexclusive,\n royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow\n others to do so, provided that clear attribution is given both to\n the authors and the Canadian government agency employing them.\n Permission to make digital or hard copies for personal or classroom\n use is granted. Copies must bear this notice and the full citation\n on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by\n others than the Canadian Government must be honored. To copy\n otherwise, distribute, republish, or post, requires prior specific\n permission and\\hspace*{.5pt}/or a fee. Request permissions from\n permissions@acm.org.\n \\or % cagovmixed\n ACM acknowledges that this contribution was co-authored by an\n affiliate of the national government of Canada. As such, the Crown\n in Right of Canada retains an equal interest in the copyright.\n Reprints must include clear attribution to ACM and the author's\n government agency affiliation. Permission to make digital or hard\n copies for personal or classroom use is granted. Copies must bear\n this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for\n components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored.\n To copy otherwise, distribute, republish, or post, requires prior\n specific permission and\\hspace*{.5pt}/or a fee. Request permissions\n from permissions@acm.org.\n \\or % licensedusgovmixed\n Publication rights licensed to ACM\\@. ACM acknowledges that this\n contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor\n or affiliate of the United States government. As such, the\n Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or\n reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government\n purposes only.\n \\or % licensedcagov\n This article was authored by employees of the Government of Canada.\n As such, the Canadian government retains all interest in the\n copyright to this work and grants to ACM a nonexclusive,\n royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow\n others to do so, provided that clear attribution is given both to\n the authors and the Canadian government agency employing them.\n Permission to make digital or hard copies for personal or classroom\n use is granted. Copies must bear this notice and the full citation\n on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by\n others than the Canadian Government must be honored. To copy\n otherwise, distribute, republish, or post, requires prior specific\n permission and\\hspace*{.5pt}/or a fee. Request permissions from\n permissions@acm.org.\n \\or % licensedcagovmixed\n Publication rights licensed to ACM\\@. ACM acknowledges that this\n contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor\n or affiliate of the national government of Canada. As such, the\n Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or\n reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government\n purposes only.\n \\or % othergov\n ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored\n by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As\n such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to\n publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for\n Government purposes only.\n \\or % licensedothergov\n Publication rights licensed to ACM\\@. ACM acknowledges that this\n contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor\n or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government\n retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce\n this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes\n only.\n \\or % iw3c2w3\n This paper is published under the Creative Commons Attribution~4.0\n International (CC-BY~4.0) license. Authors reserve their rights to\n disseminate the work on their personal and corporate Web sites with\n the appropriate attribution.\n \\or % iw3c2w3g\n This paper is published under the Creative Commons\n Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs~4.0 International\n (CC-BY-NC-ND~4.0) license. Authors reserve their rights to\n disseminate the work on their personal and corporate Web sites with\n the appropriate attribution.\n \\fi}\n\\def\\copyrightyear#1{\\def\\@copyrightyear{#1}}\n\\copyrightyear{\\@acmYear}\n\\def\\@teaserfigures{}\n\\newenvironment{teaserfigure}{\\Collect@Body\\@saveteaser}{}\n\\long\\def\\@saveteaser#1{\\g@addto@macro\\@teaserfigures{\\@teaser{#1}}}\n\\renewcommand{\\thanks}[1]{%\n \\@ifnotempty{#1}{%\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\n \\g@addto@macro\\thankses{\\thanks{A note}}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\thankses{\\thanks{#1}}%\n \\fi}}\n\\newbox\\mktitle@bx\n\\def\\maketitle{%\n \\@ACM@maketitle@typesettrue\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\n % Anonymize omission of \\author-s\n \\ifnum\\num@authorgroups=0\\author{}\\fi\n \\fi\n \\begingroup\n \\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig\n \\let\\@footnotemark\\@footnotemark@nolink\n \\let\\@footnotetext\\@footnotetext@nolink\n \\renewcommand\\thefootnote{\\@fnsymbol\\c@footnote}%\n \\hsize=\\textwidth\n \\def\\@makefnmark{\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\@thefnmark}}}%\n \\@mktitle\\if@ACM@sigchiamode\\else\\@mkauthors\\fi\\@mkteasers\n \\@printtopmatter\n \\if@ACM@sigchiamode\\@mkauthors\\fi\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}%\n \\def\\@makefnmark{\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont\\@thefnmark}}}%\n \\@titlenotes\n \\@subtitlenotes\n \\@authornotes\n \\let\\@makefnmark\\relax\n \\let\\@thefnmark\\relax\n \\let\\@makefntext\\noindent\n \\ifx\\@empty\\thankses\\else\n \\footnotetextauthorsaddresses{%\n \\def\\par{\\let\\par\\@par}\\parindent\\z@\\@setthanks}%\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@empty\\@authorsaddresses\\else\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\\else\n \\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip\n \\footnotetextauthorsaddresses{%\n \\def\\par{\\let\\par\\@par}\\parindent\\z@\\@setauthorsaddresses}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\\footnotetextcopyrightpermission{%\n \\if@ACM@authordraft\n \\raisebox{-2ex}[\\z@][\\z@]{\\makebox[0pt][l]{\\large\\bfseries\n Unpublished working draft. Not for distribution.}}%\n \\color[gray]{0.9}%\n \\fi\n \\parindent\\z@\\parskip0.1\\baselineskip\n \\if@ACM@authorversion\\else\n \\if@printpermission\\@copyrightpermission\\par\\fi\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@manuscript\\else\n \\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip\\else % Print the conference information\n {\\itshape \\acmConference@shortname, \\acmConference@date, \\acmConference@venue}\\par\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\if@printcopyright\n \\copyright\\ \\@copyrightyear\\ \\@copyrightowner\\\\\n \\else\n \\@copyrightyear.\\\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@manuscript\n Manuscript submitted to ACM\\\\\n \\else\n \\if@ACM@authorversion\n This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for\n your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive Version\n of Record was published in\n \\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip\n \\emph{\\@journalName}%\n \\else\n \\emph{\\@acmBooktitle}%\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@acmDOI\\@empty\n .\n \\else\n , \\@formatdoi{\\@acmDOI}.\n \\fi\\\\\n \\else\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\n \\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip\n \\@permissionCodeOne/\\@acmYear/\\@acmMonth-ART\\@acmArticle\n \\ifx\\@acmPrice\\@empty\\else\\ \\$\\@acmPrice\\fi\\\\\n \\@formatdoi{\\@acmDOI}%\n \\else % Conference\n \\ifx\\@acmISBN\\@empty\\else ACM~ISBN~\\@acmISBN\n \\ifx\\@acmPrice\\@empty.\\else\\dots\\$\\@acmPrice\\fi\\\\\\fi\n \\ifx\\@acmDOI\\@empty\\else\\@formatdoi{\\@acmDOI}\\fi%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi}\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}%\n \\@mkabstract\n \\if@ACM@printccs\n \\ifx\\@concepts\\@empty\\else\\bgroup\n {\\@specialsection{CCS Concepts}%\n \\noindent\\@concepts\\par}\\egroup\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@keywords\\@empty\\else\\bgroup\n {\\if@ACM@journal\n \\@specialsection{Additional Key Words and Phrases}%\n \\else\n \\@specialsection{Keywords}%\n \\fi\n \\noindent\\@keywords}\\par\\egroup\n \\fi\n \\andify\\authors\n \\andify\\shortauthors\n \\global\\let\\authors=\\authors\n \\global\\let\\shortauthors=\\shortauthors\n \\if@ACM@printacmref\n \\@mkbibcitation\n \\fi\n \\hypersetup{%\n pdfauthor={\\authors},\n pdftitle={\\@title},\n pdfsubject={\\@concepts},\n pdfkeywords={\\@keywords},\n pdfcreator={LaTeX with acmart\n \\csname ver@acmart.cls\\endcsname\\space\n and hyperref\n \\csname ver@hyperref.sty\\endcsname}}%\n \\global\\@topnum\\z@ % this prevents floats from falling\n % at the top of page 1\n \\global\\@botnum\\z@ % we do not want them to be on the bottom either\n \\@printendtopmatter\n \\@afterindentfalse\n \\@afterheading\n}\n\\def\\@specialsection#1{%\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\par\\medskip\\small\\noindent#1: %\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\par\\medskip\\small\\noindent#1: %\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\par\\medskip\\small\\noindent#1: %\n \\or % acmtog\n \\par\\medskip\\small\\noindent#1: %\n \\or % sigconf\n \\section*{#1}%\n \\or % siggraph\n \\section*{#1}%\n \\or % sigplan\n \\noindentparagraph*{#1:~}%\n \\or % sigchi\n \\section*{#1}%\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\section*{#1}%\n \\fi\n}\n\\def\\@printtopmatter{%\n \\ifx\\@startPage\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@startPage{1}%\n \\else\n \\setcounter{page}{\\@startPage}%\n \\fi\n \\thispagestyle{firstpagestyle}%\n \\noindent\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\box\\mktitle@bx\\par\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\box\\mktitle@bx\\par\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\box\\mktitle@bx\\par\n \\or % acmtog\n \\twocolumn[\\box\\mktitle@bx]%\n \\or % sigconf\n \\twocolumn[\\box\\mktitle@bx]%\n \\or % siggraph\n \\twocolumn[\\box\\mktitle@bx]%\n \\or % sigplan\n \\twocolumn[\\box\\mktitle@bx]%\n \\or % sigchi\n \\twocolumn[\\box\\mktitle@bx]%\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\par\\box\\mktitle@bx\\par\\bigskip\n \\if@ACM@badge\n \\marginpar{\\noindent\n \\ifx\\@acmBadgeL@image\\@empty\\else\n \\href{\\@acmBadgeL@url}{%\n \\includegraphics[width=\\@ACM@badge@width]{\\@acmBadgeL@image}}%\n \\hskip\\@ACM@badge@skip\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@acmBadgeR@image\\@empty\\else\n \\href{\\@acmBadgeR@url}{%\n \\includegraphics[width=\\@ACM@badge@width]{\\@acmBadgeR@image}}%\n \\fi}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n}\n\\def\\@mktitle{%\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\@mktitle@i\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\@mktitle@i\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\@mktitle@i\n \\or % acmtog\n \\@mktitle@i\n \\or % sigconf\n \\@mktitle@iii\n \\or % siggraph\n \\@mktitle@iii\n \\or % sigplan\n \\@mktitle@iii\n \\or % sigchi\n \\@mktitle@iii\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\@mktitle@iv\n \\fi\n}\n\\def\\@titlefont{%\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\LARGE\\sffamily\\bfseries\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\LARGE\\sffamily\\bfseries\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\LARGE\\sffamily\\bfseries\n \\or % acmtog\n \\Huge\\sffamily\n \\or % sigconf\n \\Huge\\sffamily\\bfseries\n \\or % siggraph\n \\Huge\\sffamily\\bfseries\n \\or % sigplan\n \\Huge\\bfseries\n \\or % sigchi\n \\Huge\\sffamily\\bfseries\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\Huge\\bfseries\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@subtitlefont{\\normalsize\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\mdseries\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\mdseries\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\mdseries\n \\or % acmtog\n \\LARGE\n \\or % sigconf\n \\LARGE\\mdseries\n \\or % siggraph\n \\LARGE\\mdseries\n \\or % sigplan\n \\LARGE\\mdseries\n \\or % sigchi\n \\LARGE\\mdseries\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\mdseries\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@mktitle@i{\\hsize=\\textwidth\n \\@ACM@title@width=\\hsize\n \\ifx\\@acmBadgeL@image\\@empty\\else\n \\advance\\@ACM@title@width by -\\@ACM@badge@width\n \\advance\\@ACM@title@width by -\\@ACM@badge@skip\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@acmBadgeR@image\\@empty\\else\n \\advance\\@ACM@title@width by -\\@ACM@badge@width\n \\advance\\@ACM@title@width by -\\@ACM@badge@skip\n \\fi\n \\setbox\\mktitle@bx=\\vbox{\\noindent\\@titlefont\n \\ifx\\@acmBadgeL@image\\@empty\\else\n \\raisebox{-.5\\baselineskip}[\\z@][\\z@]{\\href{\\@acmBadgeL@url}{%\n \\includegraphics[width=\\@ACM@badge@width]{\\@acmBadgeL@image}}}%\n \\hskip\\@ACM@badge@skip\n \\fi\n \\parbox[t]{\\@ACM@title@width}{\\raggedright\n \\@titlefont\\noindent\n \\@title\n \\ifx\\@subtitle\\@empty\\else\n \\par\\noindent{\\@subtitlefont\\@subtitle}\n \\fi}%\n \\ifx\\@acmBadgeR@image\\@empty\\else\n \\hskip\\@ACM@badge@skip\n \\raisebox{-.5\\baselineskip}[\\z@][\\z@]{\\href{\\@acmBadgeR@url}{%\n \\includegraphics[width=\\@ACM@badge@width]{\\@acmBadgeR@image}}}%\n \\fi\n \\par\\bigskip}}%\n\\def\\@mktitle@iii{\\hsize=\\textwidth\n \\setbox\\mktitle@bx=\\vbox{\\@titlefont\\centering\n \\@ACM@title@width=\\hsize\n \\if@ACM@badge\n \\advance\\@ACM@title@width by -2\\@ACM@badge@width\n \\advance\\@ACM@title@width by -2\\@ACM@badge@skip\n \\parbox[b]{\\@ACM@badge@width}{\\strut\n \\ifx\\@acmBadgeL@image\\@empty\\else\n \\raisebox{-.5\\baselineskip}[\\z@][\\z@]{\\href{\\@acmBadgeL@url}{%\n \\includegraphics[width=\\@ACM@badge@width]{\\@acmBadgeL@image}}}%\n \\fi}%\n \\hskip\\@ACM@badge@skip\n \\fi\n \\parbox[t]{\\@ACM@title@width}{\\centering\\@titlefont\n \\@title\n \\ifx\\@subtitle\\@empty\\else\n \\par\\noindent{\\@subtitlefont\\@subtitle}\n \\fi\n }%\n \\if@ACM@badge\n \\hskip\\@ACM@badge@skip\n \\parbox[b]{\\@ACM@badge@width}{\\strut\n \\ifx\\@acmBadgeR@image\\@empty\\else\n \\raisebox{-.5\\baselineskip}[\\z@][\\z@]{\\href{\\@acmBadgeR@url}{%\n \\includegraphics[width=\\@ACM@badge@width]{\\@acmBadgeR@image}}}%\n \\fi}%\n \\fi\n \\par\\bigskip}}%\n\\def\\@mktitle@iv{\\hsize=\\textwidth\n \\setbox\\mktitle@bx=\\vbox{\\raggedright\\leftskip5pc\\@titlefont\n \\noindent\\leavevmode\\leaders\\hrule height 2pt\\hfill\\kern0pt\\par\n \\noindent\\@title\n \\ifx\\@subtitle\\@empty\\else\n \\par\\noindent\\@subtitlefont\\@subtitle\n \\fi\n \\par\\bigskip}}%\n\\newbox\\@ACM@commabox\n\\def\\@ACM@addtoaddress#1{%\n \\ifvmode\\else\n \\if@ACM@affiliation@obeypunctuation\\else\n \\setbox\\@ACM@commabox=\\hbox{, }%\n \\unskip\\cleaders\\copy\\@ACM@commabox\\hskip\\wd\\@ACM@commabox\n \\fi\\fi\n #1}\n\\def\\streetaddress#1{\\unskip\\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\postcode#1{\\unskip\\ignorespaces}\n\\if@ACM@journal\n \\def\\position#1{\\unskip\\ignorespaces}\n \\def\\institution#1{\\unskip~#1\\ignorespaces}\n \\def\\city#1{\\unskip\\ignorespaces}\n \\def\\state#1{\\unskip\\ignorespaces}\n \\newcommand\\department[2][0]{\\unskip\\ignorespaces}\n \\def\\country#1{\\if@ACM@affiliation@obeypunctuation\\else, \\fi#1\\ignorespaces}\n\\else\n \\def\\position#1{\\if@ACM@affiliation@obeypunctuation#1\\else#1\\par\\fi}%\n \\def\\institution#1{\\if@ACM@affiliation@obeypunctuation#1\\else#1\\par\\fi}%\n \\newcommand\\department[2][0]{\\if@ACM@affiliation@obeypunctuation\n #2\\else#2\\par\\fi}%\n \\let\\city\\@ACM@addtoaddress\n \\let\\state\\@ACM@addtoaddress\n \\let\\country\\@ACM@addtoaddress\n\\fi\n\\def\\@mkauthors{\\begingroup\n \\hsize=\\textwidth\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\@mkauthors@i\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\@mkauthors@i\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\@mkauthors@i\n \\or % acmtog\n \\@mkauthors@i\n \\or % sigconf\n \\@mkauthors@iii\n \\or % siggraph\n \\@mkauthors@iii\n \\or % sigplan\n \\@mkauthors@iii\n \\or % sigchi\n \\@mkauthors@iii\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\@mkauthors@iv\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n}\n\\def\\@authorfont{\\Large\\sffamily}\n\\def\\@affiliationfont{\\normalsize\\normalfont}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n \\def\\@authorfont{\\large\\sffamily}\n \\def\\@affiliationfont{\\small\\normalfont}\n\\or % acmlarge\n\\or % acmtog\n \\def\\@authorfont{\\LARGE\\sffamily}\n \\def\\@affiliationfont{\\large}\n\\or % sigconf\n \\def\\@authorfont{\\LARGE}\n \\def\\@affiliationfont{\\large}\n\\or % siggraph\n \\def\\@authorfont{\\normalsize\\normalfont}\n \\def\\@affiliationfont{\\normalsize\\normalfont}\n\\or % sigplan\n \\def\\@authorfont{\\Large\\normalfont}\n \\def\\@affiliationfont{\\normalsize\\normalfont}\n\\or % sigchi\n \\def\\@authorfont{\\bfseries}\n \\def\\@affiliationfont{\\mdseries}\n\\or % sigchi-a\n \\def\\@authorfont{\\bfseries}\n \\def\\@affiliationfont{\\mdseries}\n\\fi\n\\def\\@typeset@author@line{%\n \\andify\\@currentauthors\\par\\noindent\n \\@currentauthors\\def\\@currentauthors{}%\n \\ifx\\@currentaffiliations\\@empty\\else\n \\andify\\@currentaffiliations\n \\unskip, {\\@currentaffiliations}\\par\n \\fi\n \\def\\@currentaffiliations{}}\n\\def\\@mkauthors@i{%\n \\def\\@currentauthors{}%\n \\def\\@currentaffiliations{}%\n \\global\\let\\and\\@typeset@author@line\n \\def\\@author##1{%\n \\ifx\\@currentauthors\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@currentauthors{\\@authorfont\\MakeTextUppercase{##1}}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro{\\@currentauthors}{\\and\\MakeTextUppercase{##1}}%\n \\fi\n \\gdef\\and{}}%\n \\def\\email##1##2{}%\n \\def\\affiliation##1##2{%\n \\def\\@tempa{##2}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty\\else\n \\ifx\\@currentaffiliations\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@currentaffiliations{%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{obeypunctuation=false}%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{##1}%\n \\@affiliationfont##2}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro{\\@currentaffiliations}{\\and\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{obeypunctuation=false}%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{##1}##2}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\global\\let\\and\\@typeset@author@line}%\n \\global\\setbox\\mktitle@bx=\\vbox{\\noindent\\box\\mktitle@bx\\par\\medskip\n \\noindent\\addresses\\@typeset@author@line\n \\par\\medskip}%\n}\n\\newbox\\author@bx\n\\newdimen\\author@bx@wd\n\\newskip\\author@bx@sep\n\\author@bx@sep=1pc\\relax\n\\def\\@typeset@author@bx{\\bgroup\\hsize=\\author@bx@wd\n \\def\\and{\\par}\\normalbaselines\n \\global\\setbox\\author@bx=\\vtop{\\if@ACM@sigchiamode\\else\\centering\\fi\n \\@authorfont\\@currentauthors\\par\\@affiliationfont\n \\@currentaffiliation}\\egroup\n \\box\\author@bx\\hspace{\\author@bx@sep}%\n \\gdef\\@currentauthors{}%\n \\gdef\\@currentaffiliation{}}\n\\def\\@mkauthors@iii{%\n \\author@bx@wd=\\textwidth\\relax\n \\advance\\author@bx@wd by -\\author@bx@sep\\relax\n \\ifnum\\@ACM@authorsperrow>0\\relax\n \\divide\\author@bx@wd by \\@ACM@authorsperrow\\relax\n \\else\n \\ifcase\\num@authorgroups\n \\relax % 0?\n \\or % 1=one author per row\n \\or % 2=two authors per row\n \\divide\\author@bx@wd by \\num@authorgroups\\relax\n \\or % 3=three authors per row\n \\divide\\author@bx@wd by \\num@authorgroups\\relax\n \\or % 4=two authors per row (!)\n \\divide\\author@bx@wd by 2\\relax\n \\else % three authors per row\n \\divide\\author@bx@wd by 3\\relax\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\advance\\author@bx@wd by -\\author@bx@sep\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentauthors{}%\n \\gdef\\@currentaffiliation{}%\n \\def\\@author##1{\\ifx\\@currentauthors\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@currentauthors{\\par##1}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\@currentauthors{\\par##1}%\n \\fi\n \\gdef\\and{}}%\n \\def\\email##1##2{\\ifx\\@currentaffiliation\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@currentaffiliation{\\bgroup\n \\mathchardef\\UrlBreakPenalty=10000\\nolinkurl{##2}\\egroup}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\@currentaffiliation{\\par\\bgroup\n \\mathchardef\\UrlBreakPenalty=10000\\nolinkurl{##2}\\egroup}%\n \\fi}%\n \\def\\affiliation##1##2{\\ifx\\@currentaffiliation\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@currentaffiliation{%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{obeypunctuation=false}%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{##1}##2}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\@currentaffiliation{\\par\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{obeypunctuation=false}%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{##1}##2}%\n \\fi\n \\global\\let\\and\\@typeset@author@bx\n}%\n \\hsize=\\textwidth\n \\global\\setbox\\mktitle@bx=\\vbox{\\noindent\n \\box\\mktitle@bx\\par\\medskip\\leavevmode\n \\lineskip=1pc\\relax\\centering\\hspace*{-1em}%\n \\addresses\\let\\and\\@typeset@author@bx\\and\\par\\bigskip}}\n\\def\\@mkauthors@iv{%\n \\author@bx@wd=\\columnwidth\\relax\n \\advance\\author@bx@wd by -\\author@bx@sep\\relax\n \\ifnum\\@ACM@authorsperrow>0\\relax\n \\divide\\author@bx@wd by \\@ACM@authorsperrow\\relax\n \\else\n \\ifcase\\num@authorgroups\n \\relax % 0?\n \\or % 1=one author per row\n \\else % 2=two authors per row\n \\divide\\author@bx@wd by 2\\relax\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\advance\\author@bx@wd by -\\author@bx@sep\\relax\n \\gdef\\@currentauthors{}%\n \\gdef\\@currentaffiliation{}%\n \\def\\@author##1{\\ifx\\@currentauthors\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@currentauthors{\\par##1}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\@currentauthors{\\par##1}%\n \\fi\n \\gdef\\and{}}%\n \\def\\email##1##2{\\ifx\\@currentaffiliation\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@currentaffiliation{\\nolinkurl{##2}}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\@currentaffiliation{\\par\\nolinkurl{##2}}%\n \\fi}%\n \\def\\affiliation##1##2{\\ifx\\@currentaffiliation\\@empty\n \\gdef\\@currentaffiliation{%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{obeypunctuation=false}%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{##1}##2}%\n \\else\n \\g@addto@macro\\@currentaffiliation{\\par\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{obeypunctuation=false}%\n \\setkeys{@ACM@affiliation@}{##1}##2}%\n \\fi\n \\global\\let\\and\\@typeset@author@bx}%\n \\bgroup\\hsize=\\columnwidth\n \\par\\raggedright\\leftskip=\\z@\n \\lineskip=1pc\\noindent\n \\addresses\\let\\and\\@typeset@author@bx\\and\\par\\bigskip\\egroup}\n\\def\\@mkauthorsaddresses{%\n \\ifnum\\num@authors>1\\relax\n Authors' \\else Author's \\fi\n \\ifnum\\num@authorgroups>1\\relax\n addresses: \\else address: \\fi\n \\bgroup\n \\def\\streetaddress##1{\\unskip, ##1}%\n \\def\\postcode##1{\\unskip, ##1}%\n \\def\\position##1{\\unskip\\ignorespaces}%\n \\def\\institution##1{\\unskip, ##1}%\n \\def\\city##1{\\unskip, ##1}%\n \\def\\state##1{\\unskip, ##1}%\n \\renewcommand\\department[2][0]{\\unskip\\@addpunct, ##2}%\n \\def\\country##1{\\unskip, ##1}%\n \\def\\and{\\unskip; }%\n \\def\\@author##1{##1}%\n \\def\\email##1##2{\\unskip, \\nolinkurl{##2}}%\n \\addresses\n \\egroup}\n\\AtEndDocument{\\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\\if@ACM@journal\n \\ifx\\@authorsaddresses\\@empty\n \\ClassWarningNoLine{\\@classname}{Authors'\n addresses are mandatory for ACM journals}%\n \\fi\\fi\\fi}\n\\def\\@setaddresses{}\n\\def\\@authornotemark{\\g@addto@macro\\@currentauthors{\\footnotemark\\relax}}\n\\def\\@@authornotemark#1{\\g@addto@macro\\@currentauthors{\\footnotemark[#1]}}\n\\def\\@mkteasers{%\n \\ifx\\@teaserfigures\\@empty\\else\n \\def\\@teaser##1{\\par\\bigskip\\bgroup\n \\captionsetup{type=figure}##1\\egroup\\par}\n \\global\\setbox\\mktitle@bx=\\vbox{\\noindent\\box\\mktitle@bx\\par\n \\noindent\\@Description@presentfalse\n \\@teaserfigures\\par\\if@Description@present\\else\n \\global\\@undescribed@imagestrue\n \\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{A possible image without\n description}\\fi\n \\medskip}%\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@mkabstract{\\bgroup\n \\ifx\\@abstract\\@lempty\\else\n {\\phantomsection\\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Abstract}%\n \\if@ACM@journal\n \\everypar{\\setbox\\z@\\lastbox\\everypar{}}\\small\n \\else\n \\section*{\\abstractname}%\n \\fi\n \\ignorespaces\\@abstract\\par}%\n \\fi\\egroup}\n\\def\\@mkbibcitation{\\bgroup\n \\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig\n \\def\\@pages@word{\\ifnum\\getrefnumber{TotPages}=1\\relax page\\else pages\\fi}%\n \\def\\footnotemark{}%\n \\def\\\\{\\unskip{} \\ignorespaces}%\n \\def\\footnote{\\ClassError{\\@classname}{Please do not use footnotes\n inside a \\string\\title{} or \\string\\author{} command! Use\n \\string\\titlenote{} or \\string\\authornote{} instead!}}%\n \\def\\@article@string{\\ifx\\@acmArticle\\@empty{\\ }\\else,\n Article~\\@acmArticle\\ \\fi}%\n \\par\\medskip\\small\\noindent{\\bfseries ACM Reference Format:}\\par\\nobreak\n \\noindent\\bgroup\n \\def\\\\{\\unskip{}, \\ignorespaces}\\authors\\egroup. \\@acmYear. \\@title\n \\ifx\\@subtitle\\@empty. \\else: \\@subtitle. \\fi\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\n % The 'nonacm' option disables 'printacmref' by default,\n % and the present \\@mkbibcitation definition is never used\n % in this case. The conditional remains useful if the user\n % explicitly sets \\settopmatter{printacmref=true}.\n \\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip\n \\textit{\\@journalNameShort}\n \\@acmVolume, \\@acmNumber \\@article@string (\\@acmPubDate),\n \\ref{TotPages}~\\@pages@word.\n \\else\n In \\textit{\\@acmBooktitle}%\n \\ifx\\@acmEditors\\@empty\\textit{.}\\else\n \\andify\\@acmEditors\\textit{, }\\@acmEditors~\\@editorsAbbrev.%\n \\fi\\\n ACM, New York, NY, USA%\n \\@article@string\\unskip, \\ref{TotPages}~\\@pages@word.\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@acmDOI\\@empty\\else\\@formatdoi{\\@acmDOI}\\fi\n\\par\\egroup}\n\\def\\@printendtopmatter{%\n \\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@orig\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@orig\n \\par\\bigskip\n \\let\\@vspace\\@vspace@acm\n \\let\\@vspacer\\@vspacer@acm\n }\n\\def\\@setthanks{\\long\\def\\thanks##1{\\par##1\\@addpunct.}\\thankses}\n\\def\\@setauthorsaddresses{\\@authorsaddresses\\unskip\\@addpunct.}\n\\RequirePackage{fancyhdr}\n\\let\\ACM@ps@plain\\ps@plain\n\\let\\ACM@ps@myheadings\\ps@myheadings\n\\let\\ACM@ps@headings\\ps@headings\n\\def\\ACM@restore@pagestyle{%\n \\let\\ps@plain\\ACM@ps@plain\n \\let\\ps@myheadings\\ACM@ps@myheadings\n \\let\\ps@headings\\ACM@ps@headings}\n\\AtBeginDocument{\\ACM@restore@pagestyle}\n\\if@ACM@review\n \\newsavebox{\\ACM@linecount@bx}\n \\newlength\\ACM@linecount@bxht\n \\newcount\\ACM@linecount\n \\ACM@linecount\\@ne\\relax\n \\def\\ACM@mk@linecount{%\n \\savebox{\\ACM@linecount@bx}[4em][t]{\\parbox[t]{4em}{\\normalfont\n \\normalsize\n \\setlength{\\ACM@linecount@bxht}{0pt}%\n \\loop{\\color{red}\\scriptsize\\the\\ACM@linecount}\\\\\n \\global\\advance\\ACM@linecount by \\@ne\n \\addtolength{\\ACM@linecount@bxht}{\\baselineskip}%\n \\ifdim\\ACM@linecount@bxht<\\textheight\\repeat\n {\\color{red}\\scriptsize\\the\\ACM@linecount}\\hfill\n \\global\\advance\\ACM@linecount by \\@ne}}}\n\\fi\n\\def\\ACM@linecountL{%\n \\if@ACM@review\n \\ACM@mk@linecount\n \\begin{picture}(0,0)%\n \\put(-26,-22){\\usebox{\\ACM@linecount@bx}}%\n \\end{picture}%\n \\fi}\n\\def\\ACM@linecountR{%\n \\if@ACM@review\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\relax\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\relax\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\relax\n \\or % acmtog\n \\ACM@mk@linecount\n \\or % sigconf\n \\ACM@mk@linecount\n \\or % siggraph\n \\ACM@mk@linecount\n \\or % sigplan\n \\ACM@mk@linecount\n \\or % sigchi\n \\ACM@mk@linecount\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\ACM@mk@linecount\n \\fi\n \\begin{picture}(0,0)%\n \\put(20,-22){\\usebox{\\ACM@linecount@bx}}%\n \\end{picture}%\n \\fi}\n\\if@ACM@timestamp\n % Subtracting 30 from \\time gives us the effect of rounding down despite\n % \\numexpr rounding to nearest\n \\newcounter{ACM@time@hours}\n \\setcounter{ACM@time@hours}{\\numexpr (\\time - 30) / 60 \\relax}\n \\newcounter{ACM@time@minutes}\n \\setcounter{ACM@time@minutes}{\\numexpr \\time - \\theACM@time@hours * 60 \\relax}\n \\newcommand\\ACM@timestamp{%\n \\footnotesize%\n \\ifx\\@acmSubmissionID\\@empty\\relax\\else\n Submission ID: \\@acmSubmissionID.{ }%\n \\fi\n \\the\\year-\\two@digits{\\the\\month}-\\two@digits{\\the\\day}{ }%\n \\two@digits{\\theACM@time@hours}:\\two@digits{\\theACM@time@minutes}{. }%\n Page \\thepage\\ of \\@startPage--\\pageref*{TotPages}.%\n }\n\\fi\n\\def\\@shortauthors{%\n \\if@ACM@anonymous\n Anon.\n \\ifx\\@acmSubmissionID\\@empty\\else Submission Id: \\@acmSubmissionID\\fi\n \\else\\shortauthors\\fi}\n\\def\\@headfootfont{\\sffamily\\footnotesize}\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n\\fancypagestyle{standardpagestyle}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\renewcommand{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\def\\@acmArticlePage{%\n \\ifx\\@acmArticle\\empty%\n \\if@ACM@printfolios\\thepage\\fi%\n \\else%\n \\@acmArticle\\if@ACM@printfolios:\\thepage\\fi%\n \\fi%\n }%\n \\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\if@ACM@printfolios\\thepage\\fi}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\if@ACM@printfolios\\thepage\\fi}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\@shortauthors}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\ACM@linecountL\\shorttitle}%\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\footnotesize Manuscript submitted to ACM}\n \\fi%\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\\@acmArticlePage}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\@headfootfont\\@acmArticlePage}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\@headfootfont\\@shortauthors}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\\shorttitle}%\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\footnotesize \\@journalNameShort, Vol. \\@acmVolume, No.\n \\@acmNumber, Article \\@acmArticle. Publication date: \\@acmPubDate.}%\n \\fi\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\n \\@acmArticlePage\\quad\\textbullet\\quad\\@shortauthors}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\ACM@linecountL}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\@headfootfont\n \\shorttitle\\quad\\textbullet\\quad\\@acmArticlePage}%\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\footnotesize \\@journalNameShort, Vol. \\@acmVolume, No.\n \\@acmNumber, Article \\@acmArticle. Publication date: \\@acmPubDate.}%\n \\fi\n \\or % acmtog\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\n \\@acmArticlePage\\quad\\textbullet\\quad\\@shortauthors}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\ACM@linecountL}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\@headfootfont\n \\shorttitle\\quad\\textbullet\\quad\\@acmArticlePage\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\footnotesize \\@journalNameShort, Vol. \\@acmVolume, No.\n \\@acmNumber, Article \\@acmArticle. Publication date: \\@acmPubDate.}%\n \\fi\n \\else % Proceedings\n \\fancyfoot[C]{\\if@ACM@printfolios\\footnotesize\\thepage\\fi}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\\shorttitle}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\@headfootfont\\@shortauthors\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\\footnotesize\n \\acmConference@shortname,\n \\acmConference@date, \\acmConference@venue}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\@headfootfont\n \\acmConference@shortname,\n \\acmConference@date, \\acmConference@venue\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\else % Proceedings\n \\fancyfoot[C]{\\if@ACM@printfolios\\footnotesize\\thepage\\fi}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\\shorttitle}%\n \\fancyhead[RE]{\\@headfootfont\\@shortauthors\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@headfootfont\n \\acmConference@shortname,\n \\acmConference@date, \\acmConference@venue}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\@headfootfont\n \\acmConference@shortname,\n \\acmConference@date, \\acmConference@venue\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@sigchiamode\n \\fancyheadoffset[L]{\\dimexpr(\\marginparsep+\\marginparwidth)}%\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@timestamp\n \\fancyfoot[LO,RE]{\\ACM@timestamp}\n \\fi\n}%\n\\pagestyle{standardpagestyle}\n}\n\\newdimen\\@folio@wd\n\\@folio@wd=\\z@\n\\newdimen\\@folio@ht\n\\@folio@ht=\\z@\n\\newdimen\\@folio@voffset\n\\@folio@voffset=\\z@\n\\def\\@folio@max{1}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n \\@folio@wd=45.75pt\\relax\n \\@folio@ht=1.25in\\relax\n \\@folio@voffset=.2in\\relax\n \\def\\@folio@max{8}\n\\or % acmlarge\n \\@folio@wd=43.25pt\\relax\n \\@folio@ht=79pt\\relax\n \\@folio@voffset=.55in\\relax\n \\def\\@folio@max{10}\n\\fi\n\\def\\@folioblob{\\@tempcnta=0\\@acmArticleSeq\\relax\n \\ifnum\\@tempcnta=0\\relax\\else\n \\loop\n \\ifnum\\@tempcnta>\\@folio@max\\relax\n \\advance\\@tempcnta by - \\@folio@max\n \\repeat\n \\advance\\@tempcnta by -1\\relax\n \\@tempdima=\\@folio@ht\\relax\n \\multiply\\@tempdima by \\the\\@tempcnta\\relax\n \\advance\\@tempdima by -\\@folio@voffset\\relax\n \\begin{picture}(0,0)\n \\makebox[\\z@]{\\raisebox{-\\@tempdima}{%\n \\rlap{%\n \\raisebox{-0.45\\@folio@ht}[\\z@][\\z@]{%\n \\rule{\\@folio@wd}{\\@folio@ht}}}%\n \\parbox{\\@folio@wd}{%\n \\centering\n \\textcolor{white}{\\LARGE\\sffamily\\bfseries\\@acmArticle}}}}\n \\end{picture}\\fi}\n\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n\\fancypagestyle{firstpagestyle}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\renewcommand{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\if@ACM@journal@bibstrip\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\fancyhead[L]{\\ACM@linecountL}%\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\if@ACM@printfolios\\small\\thepage\\fi}%\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\fancyfoot[RE,LO]{\\footnotesize Manuscript submitted to ACM}%\n \\fi%\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\footnotesize \\@journalNameShort, Vol. \\@acmVolume, No.\n \\@acmNumber, Article \\@acmArticle. Publication date:\n \\@acmPubDate.}%\n \\fi%\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@folioblob}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\ACM@linecountL}%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\@folioblob}%\n \\fancyheadoffset[RO,LE]{0.6\\@folio@wd}%\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\footnotesize \\@journalNameShort, Vol. \\@acmVolume, No.\n \\@acmNumber, Article \\@acmArticle. Publication date:\n \\@acmPubDate.}%\n \\fi%\n \\fancyhead[RO]{\\@folioblob}%\n \\fancyhead[LE]{\\ACM@linecountL\\@folioblob}%\n \\fancyhead[LO]{\\ACM@linecountL}%\n \\fancyheadoffset[RO,LE]{1.4\\@folio@wd}%\n \\or % acmtog\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else%\n \\fancyfoot[RO,LE]{\\footnotesize \\@journalNameShort, Vol. \\@acmVolume, No.\n \\@acmNumber, Article \\@acmArticle. Publication date:\n \\@acmPubDate.}%\n \\fi%\n \\fancyhead[L]{\\ACM@linecountL}%\n \\fancyhead[R]{\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\else % Conference proceedings\n \\fancyhead[L]{\\ACM@linecountL}%\n \\fancyhead[R]{\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\fancyfoot[C]{\\if@ACM@printfolios\\footnotesize\\thepage\\fi}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\fancyhead[L]{\\ACM@linecountL}%\n \\fancyhead[R]{\\ACM@linecountR}%\n \\fancyfoot[C]{\\if@ACM@printfolios\\footnotesize\\thepage\\fi}%\n \\fi\n \\if@ACM@timestamp\n \\ifnum\\ACM@format@nr=0\\relax % Manuscript\n \\fancyfoot[LO,RE]{\\ACM@timestamp\\quad\n \\if@ACM@nonacm\\else\n \\footnotesize Manuscript submitted to ACM\n \\fi}\n \\else\n \\fancyfoot[LO,RE]{\\ACM@timestamp}\n \\fi\n \\fi\n}}\n\\def\\ACM@NRadjust#1{%\n \\begingroup\n \\expandafter\\ifx\\csname Sectionformat\\endcsname\\relax\n % do nothing when \\Sectionformat is unknown\n \\def\\next{\\endgroup #1}%\n \\else\n \\def\\next{\\endgroup\n \\let\\realSectionformat\\Sectionformat\n \\def\\ACM@sect@format@{#1}%\n \\let\\Sectionformat\\ACM@NR@adjustedSectionformat\n %% next lines added 2018-06-17 to ensure section number is styled\n \\let\\real@adddotafter\\@adddotafter\n \\let\\@adddotafter\\ACM@adddotafter\n #1{}% imposes the styles, but nullifies \\MakeUppercase\n \\let\\@adddotafter\\real@adddotafter\n }%\n \\fi \\next\n}\n\\def\\ACM@NR@adjustedSectionformat#1#2{%\n \\realSectionformat{\\ACM@sect@format{#1}}{#2}%\n \\let\\Sectionformat\\realSectionformat}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand{\\ACM@sect@format}{\\ACM@sect@format@}\n\\def\\ACM@sect@format@null#1{#1}\n\\let\\ACM@sect@format@\\ACM@sect@format@null\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\expandafter\\ifx\\csname LTX@adddotafter\\endcsname\\relax\n \\let\\LTX@adddotafter\\@adddotafter\n \\fi\n}\n\\def\\ACM@adddotafter#1{\\ifx\\relax#1\\relax\\else\\LTX@adddotafter{#1}\\fi}\n\\renewcommand\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}%\n {-.75\\baselineskip \\@plus -2\\p@ \\@minus -.2\\p@}%\n {.25\\baselineskip}%\n {\\ACM@NRadjust\\@secfont}}\n\\renewcommand\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}%\n {-.75\\baselineskip \\@plus -2\\p@ \\@minus -.2\\p@}%\n {.25\\baselineskip}%\n {\\ACM@NRadjust\\@subsecfont}}\n\\renewcommand\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}%\n {-.5\\baselineskip \\@plus -2\\p@ \\@minus -.2\\p@}%\n {-3.5\\p@}%\n {\\ACM@NRadjust{\\@subsubsecfont\\@adddotafter}}}\n\\renewcommand\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\parindent}%\n {-.5\\baselineskip \\@plus -2\\p@ \\@minus -.2\\p@}%\n {-3.5\\p@}%\n {\\ACM@NRadjust{\\@parfont\\@adddotafter}}}\n\\newcommand\\noindentparagraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}%\n {-.5\\baselineskip \\@plus -2\\p@ \\@minus -.2\\p@}%\n {-3.5\\p@}%\n {\\ACM@NRadjust{\\@parfont}}}\n\n\\renewcommand\\part{\\@startsection{part}{9}{\\z@}%\n {-10\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -2\\p@}%\n {4\\p@}%\n {\\ACM@NRadjust\\@parfont}}\n\\def\\section@raggedright{\\@rightskip\\@flushglue\n \\rightskip\\@rightskip\n \\leftskip\\z@skip\n \\parindent\\z@}\n\\def\\@secfont{\\sffamily\\bfseries\\section@raggedright\\MakeTextUppercase}\n\\def\\@subsecfont{\\sffamily\\bfseries\\section@raggedright}\n\\def\\@subsubsecfont{\\sffamily\\itshape}\n\\def\\@parfont{\\itshape}\n\\setcounter{secnumdepth}{3}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n\\or % acmlarge\n \\def\\@secfont{\\sffamily\\large\\section@raggedright\\MakeTextUppercase}\n \\def\\@subsecfont{\\sffamily\\large\\section@raggedright}\n\\or % acmtog\n \\def\\@secfont{\\sffamily\\large\\section@raggedright\\MakeTextUppercase}\n \\def\\@subsecfont{\\sffamily\\large\\section@raggedright}\n\\or % sigconf\n \\def\\@secfont{\\bfseries\\Large\\section@raggedright\\MakeTextUppercase}\n \\def\\@subsecfont{\\bfseries\\Large\\section@raggedright}\n\\or % siggraph\n \\def\\@secfont{\\sffamily\\bfseries\\Large\\section@raggedright\\MakeTextUppercase}\n \\def\\@subsecfont{\\sffamily\\bfseries\\Large\\section@raggedright}\n\\or % sigplan\n \\def\\@secfont{\\bfseries\\Large\\section@raggedright}\n \\def\\@subsecfont{\\bfseries\\section@raggedright}\n \\def\\@subsubsecfont{\\bfseries\\section@raggedright}\n \\def\\@parfont{\\bfseries\\itshape}\n \\def\\@subparfont{\\itshape}\n\\or % sigchi\n \\setcounter{secnumdepth}{1}\n \\def\\@secfont{\\sffamily\\bfseries\\section@raggedright\\MakeTextUppercase}\n \\def\\@subsecfont{\\sffamily\\bfseries\\section@raggedright}\n\\or % sigchi-a\n \\setcounter{secnumdepth}{0}\n \\def\\@secfont{\\sffamily\\bfseries\\section@raggedright\\MakeTextUppercase}\n \\def\\@subsecfont{\\sffamily\\bfseries\\section@raggedright}\n\\fi\n\\def\\@adddotafter#1{#1\\@addpunct{.}}\n\\def\\@addspaceafter#1{#1\\@addpunct{\\enspace}}\n\\providecommand*\\@dotsep{4.5}\n\\def\\@acmplainbodyfont{\\itshape}\n\\def\\@acmplainindent{\\parindent}\n\\def\\@acmplainheadfont{\\scshape}\n\\def\\@acmplainnotefont{\\@empty}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n\\or % acmlarge\n\\or % acmtog\n\\or % sigconf\n\\or % siggraph\n\\or % sigplan\n \\def\\@acmplainbodyfont{\\itshape}\n \\def\\@acmplainindent{\\z@}\n \\def\\@acmplainheadfont{\\bfseries}\n \\def\\@acmplainnotefont{\\normalfont}\n\\or % sigchi\n\\or % sigchi-a\n\\fi\n\\newtheoremstyle{acmplain}%\n {.5\\baselineskip\\@plus.2\\baselineskip\n \\@minus.2\\baselineskip}% space above\n {.5\\baselineskip\\@plus.2\\baselineskip\n \\@minus.2\\baselineskip}% space below\n {\\@acmplainbodyfont}% body font\n {\\@acmplainindent}% indent amount\n {\\@acmplainheadfont}% head font\n {.}% punctuation after head\n {.5em}% spacing after head\n {\\thmname{#1}\\thmnumber{ #2}\\thmnote{ {\\@acmplainnotefont(#3)}}}% head spec\n\\def\\@acmdefinitionbodyfont{\\normalfont}\n\\def\\@acmdefinitionindent{\\parindent}\n\\def\\@acmdefinitionheadfont{\\itshape}\n\\def\\@acmdefinitionnotefont{\\@empty}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n\\or % acmlarge\n\\or % acmtog\n\\or % sigconf\n\\or % siggraph\n\\or % sigplan\n \\def\\@acmdefinitionbodyfont{\\normalfont}\n \\def\\@acmdefinitionindent{\\z@}\n \\def\\@acmdefinitionheadfont{\\bfseries}\n \\def\\@acmdefinitionnotefont{\\normalfont}\n\\or % sigchi\n\\or % sigchi-a\n\\fi\n\\newtheoremstyle{acmdefinition}%\n {.5\\baselineskip\\@plus.2\\baselineskip\n \\@minus.2\\baselineskip}% space above\n {.5\\baselineskip\\@plus.2\\baselineskip\n \\@minus.2\\baselineskip}% space below\n {\\@acmdefinitionbodyfont}% body font\n {\\@acmdefinitionindent}% indent amount\n {\\@acmdefinitionheadfont}% head font\n {.}% punctuation after head\n {.5em}% spacing after head\n {\\thmname{#1}\\thmnumber{ #2}\\thmnote{ {\\@acmdefinitionnotefont(#3)}}}% head spec\n\\theoremstyle{acmplain}\n\\AtEndPreamble{%\n \\if@ACM@acmthm\n \\theoremstyle{acmplain}\n \\@ifundefined{theorem}{%\n \\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]\n }{}\n \\@ifundefined{conjecture}{%\n \\newtheorem{conjecture}[theorem]{Conjecture}\n }{}\n \\@ifundefined{proposition}{%\n \\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}\n }{}\n \\@ifundefined{lemma}{%\n \\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}\n }{}\n \\@ifundefined{corollary}{%\n \\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}\n }{}\n \\theoremstyle{acmdefinition}\n \\@ifundefined{example}{%\n \\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}\n }{}\n \\@ifundefined{definition}{%\n \\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}\n }{}\n \\fi\n \\theoremstyle{acmplain}\n}\n\\def\\@proofnamefont{\\scshape}\n\\def\\@proofindent{\\indent}\n\\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n\\relax % manuscript\n\\or % acmsmall\n\\or % acmlarge\n\\or % acmtog\n\\or % sigconf\n\\or % siggraph\n\\or % sigplan\n \\def\\@proofnamefont{\\itshape}\n \\def\\@proofindent{\\noindent}\n\\or % sigchi\n\\or % sigchi-a\n\\fi\n\\renewenvironment{proof}[1][\\proofname]{\\par\n \\pushQED{\\qed}%\n \\normalfont \\topsep6\\p@\\@plus6\\p@\\relax\n \\trivlist\n \\item[\\@proofindent\\hskip\\labelsep\n {\\@proofnamefont #1\\@addpunct{.}}]\\ignorespaces\n}{%\n \\popQED\\endtrivlist\\@endpefalse\n}\n\\AtEndPreamble{%\n \\if@ACM@balance\n \\ifcase\\ACM@format@nr\n \\relax % manuscript\n \\global\\@ACM@balancefalse\n \\or % acmsmall\n \\global\\@ACM@balancefalse\n \\or % acmlarge\n \\global\\@ACM@balancefalse\n \\or % acmtog\n \\RequirePackage{balance}%\n \\or % sigconf\n \\RequirePackage{balance}%\n \\or % siggraph\n \\RequirePackage{balance}%\n \\or % sigplan\n \\RequirePackage{balance}%\n \\or % sigchi\n \\RequirePackage{balance}%\n \\or % sigchi-a\n \\global\\@ACM@balancefalse\n \\fi\n \\fi\n}\n\\AtEndDocument{%\n \\if@ACM@balance\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\balance\n \\fi\\fi}\n\\newcommand\\acksname{Acknowledgments}\n\\specialcomment{acks}{%\n \\begingroup\n \\section*{\\acksname}\n \\phantomsection\\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\\acksname}\n}{%\n \\endgroup\n}\n\\def\\grantsponsor#1#2#3{#2}\n\\newcommand\\grantnum[3][]{#3%\n \\def\\@tempa{#1}\\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty\\else\\space(\\url{#1})\\fi}\n\\AtEndPreamble{%\n\\if@ACM@screen\n \\includecomment{screenonly}\n \\excludecomment{printonly}\n\\else\n \\excludecomment{screenonly}\n \\includecomment{printonly}\n\\fi\n\\if@ACM@anonymous\n \\excludecomment{anonsuppress}\n \\excludecomment{acks}\n\\else\n \\includecomment{anonsuppress}\n\\fi}\n\\newcommand\\showeprint[2][arxiv]{%\n \\def\\@tempa{#1}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty\\def\\@tempa{arxiv}\\fi\n \\def\\@tempb{arxiv}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\n arXiv:\\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/#2}{#2}\\else arXiv:#2%\n \\fi}\n\\let\\@vspace@orig=\\@vspace\n\\let\\@vspacer@orig=\\@vspacer\n\\apptocmd{\\@vspace}{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{\\string\\vspace\\space should\n only be used to provide space above/below surrounding\n objects}}{}{}\n\\apptocmd{\\@vspacer}{\\ClassWarning{\\@classname}{\\string\\vspace\\space should\n only be used to provide space above/below surrounding\n objects}}{}{}\n\\let\\@vspace@acm=\\@vspace\n\\let\\@vspacer@acm=\\@vspacer\n\\let\\ACM@origbaselinestretch\\baselinestretch\n\\AtEndDocument{\\ifx\\baselinestretch\\ACM@origbaselinestretch\\else\n \\ClassError{\\@classname}{An attempt to redefine\n \\string\\baselinestretch\\space detected. Please do not do this for\n ACM submissions!}\\fi}\n\\normalsize\\normalfont\\frenchspacing\n\\endinput\n%%\n%% End of file `acmart.cls'.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n\n\\documentclass[sigconf, nonacm]{acmart}\n\n\\newcommand\\vldbdoi{XX.XX/XXX.XX}\n\\newcommand\\vldbpages{XXX-XXX}\n\\newcommand\\vldbvolume{20}\n\\newcommand\\vldbissue{1}\n\\newcommand\\vldbyear{2026}\n\\newcommand\\vldbauthors{\\authors}\n\\newcommand\\vldbtitle{\\shorttitle}\n\\newcommand\\vldbavailabilityurl{URL_TO_YOUR_ARTIFACTS}\n\\newcommand\\vldbpagestyle{plain}\n\\PassOptionsToPackage{dvipsnames}{xcolor}\n\\usepackage[dvipsnames]{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\usepackage{listings}\n\\usepackage{listingsutf8}\n\\usepackage{makecell}\n\\usepackage{color}\n\\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}\n\\usepackage{subcaption}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage[ngerman, english]{babel}\n\\usepackage{bibgerm}\n\\usepackage{balance}\n\\usepackage{enumitem}\n\\lstset{\n inputencoding=utf8,\n upquote=true,\n keepspaces=true,\n columns=fullflexible,\n literate=\n {Ö}{{\\\"O}}1 {Ä}{{\\\"A}}1 {Ü}{{\\\"U}}1\n {ö}{{\\\"o}}1 {ä}{{\\\"a}}1 {ü}{{\\\"u}}1\n {ß}{{\\ss}}1\n {≈}{{$\\approx$}}1\n}\n\\usepackage{csquotes}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\DeclareCaptionType[fileext=lol]{listing}\n\\usepackage{verbatim}\n\\usepackage{textcomp}\n\\usepackage{tikz}\n\\usepackage{multirow}\n\\usepackage{tabularx}\n\\usepackage[ruled,vlined]{algorithm2e}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepgflibrary{plotmarks}\n\\usepgflibrary[plotmarks]\n\\usetikzlibrary{plotmarks}\n\\usetikzlibrary[plotmarks]\n\\usepackage{fvextra}\n\\usepackage{pgfplots}\n\\usepgfplotslibrary{groupplots}\n\\pgfplotsset{compat=newest}\n\\usepackage{pgfplotstable}\n\n\\newcommand{\\CC}{CommonCrawl}\n\\newcommand{\\OSM}{OpenStreetMaps}\n\n\\definecolor{codebackground}{gray}{0.90}\n\\lstdefinestyle{code}{\n frame=tb,\n framerule=0pt,\n backgroundcolor=\\color{gray!20},\n commentstyle=\\color{Green},\n keywordstyle=\\color{magenta},\n numberstyle=\\tiny\\color{gray},\n stringstyle=\\color{purple},\n basicstyle=\\ttfamily\\footnotesize,\n breakatwhitespace=false,\n breaklines=true,\n captionpos=b,\n keepspaces=true,\n numbers=left,\n numbersep=5pt,\n showspaces=false,\n showstringspaces=false,\n showtabs=false,\n tabsize=2\n}\n\n\\newcommand{\\dsname}{\\textsf{full-named}}\n\\newcommand{\\dsnoname}{\\textsf{full-unnamed}}\n\\newcommand{\\deslice}{\\textsf{de-slice}}\n\\newcommand{\\usslice}{\\textsf{us-slice}}\n\\newcommand{\\cnslice}{\\textsf{cn-slice}}\n\\newcommand{\\ruslice}{\\textsf{ru-slice}}\n\\newcommand{\\airport}{\\textsf{airport}}\n\\newcommand{\\hotel}{\\textsf{hotel}}\n\\newcommand{\\library}{\\textsf{library}}\n\\newcommand{\\shoppingcenter}{\\textsf{shopping-center}}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\\title{Clean Me If You Can: A Large Collection of Real-World Addresses for Data Cleaning Benchmarking [Experiment, Analysis \\& Benchmark]}\n\n\\renewcommand{\\shorttitle}{Clean Me If You Can: A Large Collection of Real-World Addresses for Data Cleaning Benchmarking}\n\n\\author{Fatemeh Ahmadi$^1$, Tobias Bernhard$^1$, Mohamed Abdelmaksoud$^1$, Luca Zecchini$^1$,\\\\ Tilmann Rabl$^2$, Ziawasch Abedjan$^1$}\n\\affiliation{%\n \\institution{$^1$BIFOLD \\& TU Berlin, $^2$Hasso Plattner Institute, Potsdam}\n}\n\\email{{f.ahmadi, mohamed, luca.zecchini, abedjan}@tu-berlin.de, tilmann.rabl@hpi.de, to-tb@gmx.de}\n\n\\renewcommand{\\shortauthors}{Ahmadi et al.}\n\n\\begin{abstract}\nThere has been extensive research on automating and scaling data cleaning, i.e., the detection and correction of erroneous values in tabular data. Yet, existing approaches often perform well only within controlled environments. One of the major bottlenecks in data cleaning research is the lack of real-world datasets. In this paper, we address this gap by providing a large, dirty dataset with postal entries and their corresponding ground truth. We discuss the design decisions and challenges for obtaining the dataset. We demonstrate the limitations of existing cleaning approaches when faced with our proposed datasets and derive guidelines for future research.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\\maketitle\n\\textit{Preprint. Submitted for review.}\n\\vspace{0.5em}\n\n\\pagestyle{\\vldbpagestyle}\n\\begingroup\\small\\noindent\\raggedright\n% \\textbf{Reference Format:}\\\\\n% Fatemeh Ahmadi, Tobias Bernhard, Mohamed Abdelmaksoud, Luca Zecchini, Tilmann Rabl, Ziawasch Abedjan. \n% \\vldbtitle. \n% PVLDB, \\vldbvolume(\\vldbissue): \\vldbpages, \\vldbyear.\\\\\n% \\href{https://doi.org/\\vldbdoi}{doi:\\vldbdoi}\n\\endgroup\n% \\begingroup\n% \\renewcommand\\thefootnote{}\\footnote{\\noindent\n% This work is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License. Visit \\url{https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/} to view a copy of this license. \n% For any use beyond those covered by this license, obtain permission by emailing \\href{mailto:info@vldb.org}{info@vldb.org}. Copyright is held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to the VLDB Endowment. \\\\\n% \\raggedright Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, Vol. \\vldbvolume, No. \\vldbissue\\ %\n% ISSN 2150-8097. \\\\\n% \\href{https://doi.org/\\vldbdoi}{doi:\\vldbdoi} \\\\\n% }\\addtocounter{footnote}{-1}\\endgroup\n\n\\ifdefempty{\\vldbavailabilityurl}{}{\n\\vspace{.3cm}\n\\begingroup\\small\\noindent\\raggedright\\textbf{Artifact Availability:}\\\\\nThe source code, data, and other artifacts have been made available at \\url{https://github.com/D2IP-TUB/Clean-Me-If-You-Can}}.\n\\endgroup\n\n\\setcounter{section}{0}\n\\input{sections/introduction}\n\\input{sections/related_work}\n\\input{sections/requirements}\n\\input{sections/dataset}\n\\input{sections/dataset_statistics}\n\\input{sections/experiments}\n\\input{sections/conclusion}\n\n\\bibliographystyle{ACM-Reference-Format}\n\\bibliography{abbreviations,references}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: references.bib\n================================================\n@inproceedings{subramani-etal-2023-detecting,\n title = \"Detecting Personal Information in Training Corpora: an Analysis\",\n author = \"Subramani, Nishant and\n Luccioni, Sasha and\n Dodge, Jesse and\n Mitchell, Margaret\",\n booktitle = \"Proceedings of the Workshop on Trustworthy Natural Language Processing (TrustNLP)\",\n year = \"2023\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2023.trustnlp-1.18/\",\n doi = \"10.18653/v1/2023.trustnlp-1.18\",\n pages = \"208--220\",\n}\n\n@Article{digital4040051,\n author = {Jasmin Singh and\n Heiko Gebauer},\n title = {Clean Customer Master Data for Customer Analytics: {A} Neglected Element of Data Monetization},\n journal = {Digital},\n volume = {4},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1020--1038},\n year = {2024},\n doi = {10.3390/digital4040051}\n}\n\n@article{DBLP:journals/pacmmod/SiddiqiKB23,\n author = {Shafaq Siddiqi and\n Roman Kern and\n Matthias Boehm},\n title = {{SAGA:} {A} Scalable Framework for Optimizing Data Cleaning Pipelines for Machine Learning Applications},\n journal = PACMMOD,\n volume = {1},\n number = {3},\n eid = {218},\n numpages = {26},\n year = {2023},\n doi = {10.1145/3617338}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/icde/LiRBZCZ21,\n author = {Peng Li and\n Xi Rao and\n Jennifer Blase and\n Yue Zhang and\n Xu Chu and\n Ce Zhang},\n title = {CleanML: {A} Study for Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on {ML}\n Classification Tasks},\n booktitle = ICDE,\n year = {2021},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE51399.2021.00009},\n doi = {10.1109/ICDE51399.2021.00009},\n timestamp = {Fri, 23 May 2025 21:08:46 +0200},\n biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/icde/LiRBZCZ21.bib},\n bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}\n}\n\n@article{DBLP:journals/is/MohammedBFINNPNH25,\n author = {Sedir Mohammed and\n Lukas Budach and\n Moritz Feuerpfeil and\n Nina Ihde and\n Andrea Nathansen and\n Nele Sina Noack and\n Hendrik Patzlaff and\n Felix Naumann and\n Hazar Harmouch},\n title = {The effects of data quality on machine learning performance on tabular\n data},\n journal = IS,\n volume = {132},\n eid = {102549},\n numpages = {18},\n year = {2025},\n doi = {10.1016/j.is.2025.102549}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/sigmod/SantoroAGMMP16,\n author = {Donatello Santoro and\n Patricia C. Arocena and\n Boris Glavic and\n Giansalvatore Mecca and\n Ren{\\'{e}}e J. Miller and\n Paolo Papotti},\n title = {{BART} in Action: Error Generation and Empirical Evaluations of Data-Cleaning\n Systems},\n booktitle = SIGMOD,\n pages = {2161--2164},\n year = {2016},\n doi = {10.1145/2882903.2899397}\n}\n@article{DBLP:journals/sigmod/MohammedEHNS25,\n author = {Sedir Mohammed and\n Lisa Ehrlinger and\n Hazar Harmouch and\n Felix Naumann and\n Divesh Srivastava},\n title = {The Five Facets of Data Quality Assessment},\n journal = SIGMODREC,\n volume = {54},\n number = {2},\n pages = {18--27},\n year = {2025},\n doi = {10.1145/3749116.3749120}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{Leeuw1992DataQI,\n title={Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and Face to Face Surveys.},\n author={Edith Desiree {de Leeuw}},\n year={1992},\n url={https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED374136}\n}\n\n@article{NiMZWLY24,\n author = {Wei Ni and\n Xiaoye Miao and\n Xiangyu Zhao and\n Yangyang Wu and\n Shuwei Liang and\n Jianwei Yin},\n title = {Automatic Data Repair: Are We Ready to Deploy?},\n journal = PVLDB,\n volume = {17},\n number = {10},\n pages = {2617--2630},\n year = {2024},\n url = {https://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol17/p2617-miao.pdf},\n doi = {10.14778/3675034.3675051},\n timestamp = {Fri, 04 Jul 2025 22:14:53 +0200},\n biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/journals/pvldb/NiMZWLY24.bib},\n bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}\n}\n\n@article{AbedjanCDFIOPST16,\n author = {Ziawasch Abedjan and\n Xu Chu and\n Dong Deng and\n Raul Castro Fernandez and\n Ihab F. Ilyas and\n Mourad Ouzzani and\n Paolo Papotti and\n Michael Stonebraker and\n Nan Tang},\n title = {Detecting Data Errors: Where are we and what needs to be done?},\n journal = PVLDB,\n volume = {9},\n number = {12},\n pages = {993--1004},\n year = {2016},\n url = {http://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol9/p993-abedjan.pdf},\n doi = {10.14778/2994509.2994518},\n timestamp = {Mon, 03 Jan 2022 22:06:49 +0100},\n biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/journals/pvldb/AbedjanCDFIOPST16.bib},\n bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}\n}\n\n@article{DBLP:journals/pvldb/AbedjanAOPS15,\n author = {Ziawasch Abedjan and\n Cuneyt G. Akcora and\n Mourad Ouzzani and\n Paolo Papotti and\n Michael Stonebraker},\n title = {Temporal Rules Discovery for Web Data Cleaning},\n journal = PVLDB,\n volume = {9},\n number = {4},\n pages = {336--347},\n year = {2015},\n url = {http://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol9/p336-abedjan.pdf},\n doi = {10.14778/2856318.2856328},\n timestamp = {Sun, 06 Oct 2024 21:37:12 +0200},\n biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/journals/pvldb/AbedjanAOPS15.bib},\n bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}\n}\n\n@misc{blog-september24-crawl,\n title = {September 2024 {{Crawl Archive Now Available}}},\n author = {Vaughan, Thom},\n year = {2024},\n month = sep,\n journal = {Common Crawl - Blog},\n langid = {english},\n url = {https://commoncrawl.org/blog/september-2024-crawl-archive-now-available},\n note = {Accessed: 26 Jan. 2025},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://commoncrawl.org/blog/september-2024-crawl-archive-now-available}}\n}\n\n@book{vivasAddressingPostcodeManual2009,\n title = {Addressing and {{Postcode Manual}}},\n author = {Vivas, Patricia and Lubenow, Joe},\n year = {2009},\n month = mar,\n publisher = {Universal Postal Union (UPU)},\n langid = {english},\n file = {/Users/tobi/Zotero/storage/ZU25Q5A4/Vivas and Lubenow - Addressing and Postcode Manual.pdf}\n}\n@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/icde/WuYZMNXZY25,\n author = {Yangyang Wu and\n Chen Yang and\n Mengying Zhu and\n Xiaoye Miao and\n Wei Ni and\n Meng Xi and\n Xinkui Zhao and\n Jianwei Yin},\n title = {A Zero-Training Error Correction System with Large Language Models},\n booktitle = ICDE,\n pages = {2949--2962},\n year = {2025},\n doi = {10.1109/ICDE65448.2025.00221}\n}\n@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/icde/NiZMZWWY25,\n author = {Wei Ni and\n Kaihang Zhang and\n Xiaoye Miao and\n Xiangyu Zhao and\n Yangyang Wu and\n Yaoshu Wang and\n Jianwei Yin},\n title = {ZeroED: Hybrid Zero-Shot Error Detection Through Large Language Model\n Reasoning},\n booktitle = {41st {IEEE} International Conference on Data Engineering, {ICDE} 2025,\n Hong Kong, May 19-23, 2025},\n pages = {3126--3139},\n publisher = {{IEEE}},\n year = {2025},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE65448.2025.00234},\n doi = {10.1109/ICDE65448.2025.00234},\n timestamp = {Fri, 05 Sep 2025 21:24:36 +0200},\n biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/icde/NiZMZWWY25.bib},\n bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}\n}\n@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/sigmod/MahdaviAFMOS019,\n author = {Mohammad Mahdavi and\n Ziawasch Abedjan and\n Raul Castro Fernandez and\n Samuel Madden and\n Mourad Ouzzani and\n Michael Stonebraker and\n Nan Tang},\n title = {Raha: {A} Configuration-Free Error Detection System},\n booktitle = SIGMOD,\n pages = {865--882},\n year = {2019},\n doi = {10.1145/3299869.3324956}\n}\n@article{DBLP:journals/pvldb/MahdaviA20,\n author = {Mohammad Mahdavi and\n Ziawasch Abedjan},\n title = {Baran: Effective Error Correction via a Unified Context Representation\n and Transfer Learning},\n journal = PVLDB,\n volume = {13},\n number = {11},\n pages = {1948--1961},\n year = {2020},\n doi = {10.14778/3407790.3407801}\n}\n@article{DBLP:journals/pvldb/RezigOAEMS21,\n author = {El Kindi Rezig and\n Mourad Ouzzani and\n Walid G. Aref and\n Ahmed K. Elmagarmid and\n Ahmed R. Mahmood and\n Michael Stonebraker},\n title = {Horizon: Scalable Dependency-driven Data Cleaning},\n journal = PVLDB,\n volume = {14},\n number = {11},\n pages = {2546--2554},\n year = {2021},\n doi = {10.14778/3476249.3476301}\n}\n@article{DBLP:journals/pvldb/NiMZWLY24,\n author = {Wei Ni and\n Xiaoye Miao and\n Xiangyu Zhao and\n Yangyang Wu and\n Shuwei Liang and\n Jianwei Yin},\n title = {Automatic Data Repair: Are We Ready to Deploy?},\n journal = PVLDB,\n volume = {17},\n number = {10},\n pages = {2617--2630},\n year = {2024},\n doi = {10.14778/3675034.3675051}\n}\n@article{DBLP:journals/jmlr/BiessmannRSNSTL19,\n author = {Felix Bie{\\ss}mann and\n Tammo Rukat and\n Philipp Schmidt and\n Prathik Naidu and\n Sebastian Schelter and\n Andrey Taptunov and\n Dustin Lange and\n David Salinas},\n title = {DataWig: Missing Value Imputation for Tables},\n journal = {Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR)},\n volume = {20},\n eid = {175},\n numpages = {6},\n year = {2019},\n url = {https://jmlr.org/papers/v20/18-753.html}\n}\n@article{glock2150detecting,\n title={Detecting and Cleaning Errors in Personal Contact Information with Large Language Models},\n author={Glock, Anna-Christina and Dominka-Kiss, Christine and Korom, Philipp and Ehrlinger, Lisa},\n journal=PVLDB,\nyear={2025}\n}\n@article{DBLP:journals/pvldb/RekatsinasCIR17,\n author = {Theodoros Rekatsinas and\n Xu Chu and\n Ihab F. Ilyas and\n Christopher R{\\'{e}}},\n title = {HoloClean: Holistic Data Repairs with Probabilistic Inference},\n journal = PVLDB,\n volume = {10},\n number = {11},\n pages = {1190--1201},\n year = {2017},\n doi = {10.14778/3137628.3137631}\n}\n@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/icde/ChuIP13,\n author = {Xu Chu and\n Ihab F. Ilyas and\n Paolo Papotti},\n title = {Holistic Data Cleaning: Putting Violations Into Context},\n booktitle = ICDE,\n pages = {458--469},\n year = {2013},\n doi = {10.1109/ICDE.2013.6544847}\n}\n@article{DBLP:journals/pvldb/DingQWCTSHW25,\n author = {Xiaoou Ding and\n Zekai Qian and\n Hongzhi Wang and\n Siying Chen and\n Yafeng Tang and\n Hongbin Su and\n Huan Hu and\n Chen Wang},\n title = {UniClean: {A} Scalable Data Cleaning Solution for Mixed Errors based\n on Unified Cleaners and Optimized Cleaning Workflow},\n journal = PVLDB,\n year = {2025},\n volume = {18},\n number = {11},\n pages = {4117--4130},\n year = {2025},\n doi = {10.14778/3749646.3749681}\n}\n\n@article{DBLP:journals/cacm/Damerau64,\n author = {Fred {Damerau}},\n title = {{A Technique for Computer Detection and Correction of Spelling Errors}},\n journal = CACM,\n volume = {7},\n number = {3},\n pages = {171--176},\n year = {1964},\n doi = {10.1145/363958.363994}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/edbt/0003HS23,\n author = {Mohamed Abdelaal and\n Christian Hammacher and\n Harald Sch{\\\"{o}}ning},\n title = {{REIN:} {A} Comprehensive Benchmark Framework for Data Cleaning Methods in {ML} Pipelines},\n booktitle = EDBT,\n pages = {499--511},\n year = {2023},\n doi = {10.48786/edbt.2023.43}\n}\n@article{DBLP:journals/pvldb/KarlasLWGC0020,\n author = {Bojan Karlas and\n Peng Li and\n Renzhi Wu and\n Nezihe Merve G{\\\"{u}}rel and\n Xu Chu and\n Wentao Wu and\n Ce Zhang},\n title = {Nearest Neighbor Classifiers over Incomplete Information: From Certain\n Answers to Certain Predictions},\n journal = PVLDB,\n volume = {14},\n number = {3},\n pages = {255--267},\n year = {2020},\n doi = {10.14778/3430915.3430917}\n}\n@article{DBLP:journals/pvldb/ArocenaGMMPS15,\n author = {Patricia C. Arocena and\n Boris Glavic and\n Giansalvatore Mecca and\n Ren{\\'{e}}e J. Miller and\n Paolo Papotti and\n Donatello Santoro},\n title = {Messing Up with {BART:} Error Generation for Evaluating Data-Cleaning Algorithms},\n journal = PVLDB,\n volume = {9},\n number = {2},\n pages = {36--47},\n year = {2015},\n doi = {10.14778/2850578.2850579}\n}\n@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/edbt/SchelterRB21,\n author = {Sebastian Schelter and\n Tammo Rukat and\n Felix Biessmann},\n title = {{JENGA} - {A} Framework to Study the Impact of Data Errors on the\n Predictions of Machine Learning Models},\n booktitle = EDBT,\n pages = {529--534},\n year = {2021},\n doi = {10.5441/002/edbt.2021.63}\n}\n@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/deem/RestatBCS22,\n author = {Valerie Restat and\n Gerrit Boerner and\n Andr{\\'{e}} Conrad and\n Uta St{\\\"{o}}rl},\n title = {GouDa - Generation of universal Data Sets: Improving Analysis and Evaluation of Data Preparation Pipelines},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the Workshop on Data Management for End-To-End Machine Learning (DEEM)},\n eid = {2},\n numpages = {6},\n year = {2022},\n doi = {10.1145/3533028.3533311}\n}\n@article{DBLP:journals/pvldb/LiDLMS12,\n author = {Xian Li and\n Xin Luna Dong and\n Kenneth Lyons and\n Weiyi Meng and\n Divesh Srivastava},\n title = {Truth Finding on the Deep Web: Is the Problem Solved?},\n journal = PVLDB,\n volume = {6},\n number = {2},\n pages = {97--108},\n year = {2012},\n doi = {10.14778/2535568.2448943}\n}\n@article{ouzzani2016rayyan,\n title={Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews},\n author={Ouzzani, Mourad and Hammady, Hossam and Fedorowicz, Zbys and Elmagarmid, Ahmed},\n journal={Systematic Reviews},\n volume={5},\n eid={210},\n numpages={10},\n year={2016},\n doi={10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4}\n}\n@inproceedings{beers_dataset,\n title={Craft Beers Dataset},\n author={Hould, Jean-Nicholas},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://www.kaggle.com/nickhould/craft-cans}},\n note={Version 1},\n year={2017},\n}\n\n@article{DBLP:journals/pvldb/LiC25,\n author = {Yi Li and\n Gao Cong},\n title = {GeoBloom: Revisiting Lightweight Models for Geographic Information\n Retrieval},\n journal = PVLDB,\n volume = {18},\n number = {5},\n pages = {1348--1361},\n year = {2025},\n doi = {10.14778/3718057.3718064}\n}\n\n@article{DBLP:journals/pvldb/LiuPCY17,\n author = {Yiding Liu and\n Tuan{-}Anh Nguyen Pham and\n Gao Cong and\n Quan Yuan},\n title = {An Experimental Evaluation of Point-of-interest Recommendation in\n Location-based Social Networks},\n journal = PVLDB,\n volume = {10},\n number = {10},\n pages = {1010--1021},\n year = {2017},\n doi = {10.14778/3115404.3115407}\n}\n@article{DBLP:journals/jdiq/JungJCB25,\n author = {Philipp Jung and\n Sebastian J{\\\"{a}}ger and\n Nicholas Chandler and\n Felix Biessmann},\n title = {Towards Realistic Error Models for Tabular Data},\n journal = {{ACM} J. Data Inf. Qual.},\n volume = {17},\n number = {4},\n pages = {28:1--28:27},\n year = {2025},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3774914},\n doi = {10.1145/3774914},\n timestamp = {Sun, 01 Feb 2026 13:41:06 +0100},\n biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/journals/jdiq/JungJCB25.bib},\n bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}\n}\n@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/www/BrinkmannPB23,\n author = {Alexander Brinkmann and\n Anna Primpeli and\n Christian Bizer},\n editor = {Ying Ding and\n Jie Tang and\n Juan F. Sequeda and\n Lora Aroyo and\n Carlos Castillo and\n Geert{-}Jan Houben},\n title = {The Web Data Commons Schema.org Data Set Series},\n booktitle = {Companion Proceedings of the {ACM} Web Conference 2023, {WWW} 2023,\n Austin, TX, USA, 30 April 2023 - 4 May 2023},\n pages = {136--139},\n publisher = {{ACM}},\n year = {2023},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3543873.3587331},\n doi = {10.1145/3543873.3587331},\n timestamp = {Sun, 19 Jan 2025 13:10:04 +0100},\n biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/www/BrinkmannPB23.bib},\n bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}\n}\n\n\n% ---- libraries and algorithms used in the error taxonomy classifier ----\n\n@article{barrington2017libpostal,\n author = {Barrington-Leigh, Christopher and Millard-Ball, Adam},\n title = {The World's User-Generated Road Map Is More Than 80\\% Complete},\n journal = {PLOS ONE},\n volume = {12},\n number = {8},\n pages = {e0180698},\n year = {2017},\n doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0180698}\n}\n\n@article{levenshtein1966binary,\n author = {Levenshtein, Vladimir I.},\n title = {Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions, and Reversals},\n journal = {Soviet Physics Doklady},\n volume = {10},\n number = {8},\n pages = {707--710},\n year = {1966}\n}\n\n@book{bird2009nltk,\n author = {Bird, Steven and Klein, Ewan and Loper, Edward},\n title = {Natural Language Processing with {Python}},\n publisher = {O'Reilly Media},\n year = {2009},\n isbn = {978-0-596-51649-9}\n}\n\n@article{miller1995wordnet,\n author = {Miller, George A.},\n title = {{WordNet}: {A} Lexical Database for {English}},\n journal = {Communications of the ACM},\n volume = {38},\n number = {11},\n pages = {39--41},\n year = {1995},\n doi = {10.1145/219717.219748}\n}\n\n@misc{ftfy,\n author = {Robyn Speer},\n title = {ftfy: {F}ixes {T}ext {F}or {Y}ou},\n year = {2023},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://github.com/rspeer/python-ftfy}}\n}\n\n@misc{lingua2024,\n author = {Peter M. Stahl},\n title = {lingua-language-detector: {A}ccurate Natural Language Detection},\n year = {2024},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://github.com/pemistahl/lingua-py}}\n}\n\n@misc{rapidfuzz2024,\n author = {Max Bachmann},\n title = {{RapidFuzz}: {R}apid fuzzy string matching in {P}ython},\n year = {2024},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://github.com/maxbachmann/RapidFuzz}}\n}\n\n@misc{unidecode,\n author = {Tomaz Solc},\n title = {Unidecode: {ASCII} Transliterations of Unicode Text},\n year = {2023},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://pypi.org/project/Unidecode/}}\n}\n\n@misc{pycountry,\n author = {Christian Theune},\n title = {pycountry: {ISO} Databases for Countries, Subdivisions, Languages, Currencies and Scripts},\n year = {2024},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://pypi.org/project/pycountry/}}\n}\n\n@misc{regex2024,\n author = {Matthew Barnett},\n title = {regex: {A}lternative Regular Expression Module for {Python}},\n year = {2024},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://pypi.org/project/regex/}}\n}\n\n@misc{unicode2024,\n author = {{The Unicode Consortium}},\n title = {The {Unicode} Standard, Version~15.1},\n year = {2024},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode15.1.0/}}\n}\n\n@misc{python3stdlib,\n author = {{Python Software Foundation}},\n title = {Python~3 Standard Library},\n year = {2024},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://docs.python.org/3/library/}}\n}\n\n@misc{usps,\n author = {{United States Postal Service}},\n title = {{Undeliverable as Addressed Mail}},\n year = {2014},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://www.uspsoig.gov/reports/audit-reports/undeliverable-addressed-mail}}\n}\n\n@article{DBLP:journals/cj/HuhtalaKPT99,\n author = {Yk{\\\"{a}} Huhtala and\n Juha K{\\\"{a}}rkk{\\\"{a}}inen and\n Pasi Porkka and\n Hannu Toivonen},\n title = {{TANE:} An Efficient Algorithm for Discovering Functional and Approximate\n Dependencies},\n journal = {Comput. J.},\n volume = {42},\n number = {2},\n pages = {100--111},\n year = {1999},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/42.2.100},\n doi = {10.1093/COMJNL/42.2.100},\n timestamp = {Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:44:07 +0200},\n biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/journals/cj/HuhtalaKPT99.bib},\n bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}\n}\n\n@misc{wdc_schema_org_subsets,\n author = {Web Data Commons},\n title = {{Class-Specific Subsets of the Schema.org Data Contained in the October 2024 Corpus}},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://webdatacommons.org/structureddata/2024-12/stats/schema_org_subsets.html}}\n}\n\n% ---- standards and external documentation ----\n\n@misc{nominatim-docs,\n author = {{Nominatim Development Team}},\n title = {Nominatim Documentation},\n year = {2025},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://nominatim.org/release-docs/latest/}},\n note = {Accessed: 2025}\n}\n\n@misc{nominatim,\n author = {{OpenStreetMap Foundation}},\n title = {Nominatim: Search {OpenStreetMap} Data by Name and Address},\n year = {2025},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://nominatim.org}},\n note = {Accessed: 2025}\n}\n\n@misc{tomtom,\n author = {{TomTom}},\n title = {{TomTom Geocoding API}},\n year = {2024},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://developer.tomtom.com/geocoding-api/documentation/product-information/introduction}},\n note = {Accessed: 2025}\n}\n\n@misc{overturemaps,\n author = {{Overture Maps Foundation}},\n title = {Overture Maps},\n year = {2024},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://overturemaps.org}},\n note = {Accessed: 2025}\n}\n\n@misc{openaddresses,\n author = {{OpenAddresses}},\n title = {{OpenAddresses}: The Free, Open Global Address Collection},\n year = {2024},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://openaddresses.io}},\n note = {Accessed: 2025}\n}\n\n@misc{ISO3166,\n author = {{International Organization for Standardization}},\n title = {{ISO} 3166-1:2020 --- Codes for the Representation of Names of\n Countries and Their Subdivisions --- Part~1: Country Codes},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://www.iso.org/standard/72482.html}},\n year = {2020}\n}\n\n@misc{AddressCountrya,\n author = {{Schema.org}},\n title = {{Schema.org}: \\texttt{addressCountry}},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://schema.org/addressCountry}},\n year = {2024},\n note = {Accessed: 2025}\n}\n\n@misc{PostalAddress,\n author = {{Schema.org}},\n title = {{Schema.org}: \\texttt{PostalAddress}},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://schema.org/PostalAddress}},\n year = {2024},\n note = {Accessed: 2025}\n}\n\n@article{DBLP:journals/corr/abs-2604-09277,\n author = {Divya Bhadauria and\n Hazar Harmouch and\n Felix Naumann and\n Divesh Srivastava and\n Lisa Ehrlinger},\n title = {A Catalog of Data Errors},\n journal = {CoRR},\n volume = {abs/2604.09277},\n year = {2026},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.09277},\n doi = {10.48550/ARXIV.2604.09277},\n eprinttype = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2604.09277},\n timestamp = {Fri, 08 May 2026 10:42:58 +0200},\n biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/journals/corr/abs-2604-09277.bib},\n bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}\n}\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/conclusion.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Conclusions}\n\\label{sec:conclusion}\nIn this paper, we present the first large-scale dirty address dataset with ground truth. The dirty version of the dataset contains real-world addresses. The collected addresses are dirty and inconsistent. The dataset contains a high variety of errors, enabling reasoning on different types and rates of errors. Using a geo-location service and additional manual postprocessing, we obtained a corresponding ground truth. For ease of use, we also provide country-based and POI-based slices of the dataset. With this dataset, we aim to support research in data cleaning. In fact, we also highlight that existing prototypes show significant limitations in handling our dataset.\nBeyond data cleaning, the dataset might also be interesting for use cases such as data transformation discovery or entity resolution.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/dataset.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Dataset Creation}\n\\label{sec:dataset}\n\nChoosing the postal domain for benchmarking also has practical advantages, as the data and ground truth are generally accessible and understandable by any data engineer.\nYet, as we will describe in this section, the scalable extraction and annotation of addresses requires a careful process for searching and postprocessing.\nA rich source for arbitrarily created datasets that are operational is the Web. Thus, one could extract visible addresses in regular Web dumps, such as the Web Data Commons (WDC) corpus~\\cite{DBLP:conf/www/BrinkmannPB23}. At the same time, there are several commercial services that provide clean address records. The process can be divided in six major steps that are introduced below and detailed and justified in the following subsections.\n\n\\begin{enumerate}[leftmargin=*]\n\n\\item \\textbf{Download WDC N-Quads.}\nThe WDC project extracts structured data from Common Crawl\\footnote{\\url{https://commoncrawl.org}} and publishes pre-extracted RDF statements in N-Quads format~\\cite{DBLP:conf/www/BrinkmannPB23}. We downloaded all class-specific Schema.org subsets\\footnote{\\url{https://webdatacommons.org/structureddata/2024-12/stats/schema_org_subsets.html}} that contain \\textsf{PostalAddress} annotations\\footnote{\\url{https://schema.org/PostalAddress}}, covering types of points of interest (POIs) such as \\textit{Library}, \\textit{Hotel}, and \\textit{Hospital}, as well as the \\textsf{html-mf-adr} subset from the Microformats source\\footnote{\\url{https://webdatacommons.org/structureddata/2024-12/stats/stats.html}}.\\\\\n$\\quad\\rightarrow\\;$ 12.9B N-Quads from 22 Schema.org subsets\\\\\n$\\quad\\rightarrow\\;$ 41M N-Quads from the \\textsf{html-mf-adr} subset\n\n\\item \\textbf{Extract address information.}\nWe parsed the downloaded N-Quads to identify address entities and reconstruct them as dataset records. We extracted \\textsf{schema:PostalAddress} entities from the class-specific Schema.org subsets and \\textsf{vcard:Address} entities from the \\textsf{html-mf-adr} subset.\nAfter collecting its fields, each extracted address entity is represented as one \\emph{dirty record}, as it may contain errors.\\\\\n$\\quad\\rightarrow\\;$ 247.9M dirty records from \\textsf{schema:PostalAddress} entities\\\\\n$\\quad\\rightarrow\\;$ 11.8M dirty records from \\textsf{vcard:Address} entities\n\n\\item \\textbf{Filter out unverifiable addresses.}\nWe discarded dirty records that provided neither street name, nor locality, nor postal code, as their information was insufficient for geocoding validation.\\\\\n$\\quad\\rightarrow\\;$ 219.9M dirty records from \\textsf{schema:PostalAddress} entities\\\\\n$\\quad\\rightarrow\\;$ 8.5M dirty records from \\textsf{vcard:Address} entities\n\n\\item \\textbf{Retrieve reference addresses.}\nWe searched for corresponding reference addresses using a geocoding service. After matching and validation, we treat these reference addresses as \\emph{ground-truth records}. The matching and validation procedure is discussed in detail in Section~\\ref{sec:data_validation}.\\\\\n$\\quad\\rightarrow$ 29.7M pairs of dirty and ground-truth records\n\n\\item \\textbf{Align the schema for dirty and ground-truth records.}\nWe mapped the attributes of dirty and ground-truth records to a common schema and excluded pairs in which the ground-truth record contained imprecise or incomplete information.\nWe also removed exact duplicates, i.e., records that appeared multiple times in the exact same format on the same Web page.\\\\\n$\\quad\\rightarrow\\;$ \\textbf{\\dsnoname{} address dataset}: 9,317,886 dirty records with the corresponding ground truth (without names)\n\n\\item \\textbf{Filter out entity mismatches.}\nWe ensured that the name referred to the same real-world entity in both the dirty record and the corresponding ground truth.\\\\\n$\\quad\\rightarrow\\;$ \\textbf{\\dsname{} address dataset}: 4,338,109 dirty records with the corresponding ground truth (with names).\n\n\\end{enumerate}\n\nWe further refined the \\dsname{} dataset into several variations.\nA detailed overview of all datasets and their key properties is provided in Table~\\ref{tab:facility-error-summary}.\nNext, we describe each step in the dataset generation process in further detail.\n\n\\subsection{Dirty Data Collection}\n\\label{sec:data_collection}\n\nTo obtain addresses in their dirty version, we used structured data pre-extracted from Common Crawl snapshots and publicly released as RDF N-Quads by the WDC project~\\cite{DBLP:conf/www/BrinkmannPB23}.\nWe used the WDC release for December 2024, the most recent at the time of data collection.\n\n\\subsubsection{Address Extraction}\n\\label{sec:address_extraction}\n\nWe extracted records containing address information from two complementary WDC sources: Schema.org and Microformats.\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Class-specific Schema.org subsets.}\nWDC extracts Schema.org annotations from Web pages and publishes them in\nclass-specific subsets according to the annotated entity type, such as\n\\textit{Library}, \\textit{Hotel}, and \\textit{Hospital}.\nWe downloaded all 22 subsets that contain entities with \\textsf{schema:PostalAddress}\nannotations, comprising 12.9B RDF statements in N-Quads format.\nIn this format, each line encodes a single\n(\\textsf{subject}, \\textsf{predicate}, \\textsf{object}, \\textsf{graph IRI}) tuple,\nwhere \\textsf{graph IRI} represents the source page URL.\nEach address is therefore distributed across multiple lines, one per field, as shown in Listing~\\ref{lst:nquads_example}.\nFor each node typed as \\textsf{schema:PostalAddress}, we extracted its address fields, including \\textsf{streetAddress}, \\textsf{postalCode}, \\textsf{addressLocality}, \\textsf{addressRegion}, and \\textsf{addressCountry}.\nWe then searched for an entity whose \\textsf{schema:address} property pointed to that address node. From this entity, we extracted its \\textsf{schema:name} property. In Listing~\\ref{lst:nquads_example}, \\texttt{\\_:b1} is the address node, and \\texttt{\\_:b0} is the \\textsf{LocalBusiness} entity whose address is \\texttt{\\_:b1}.\nListing~\\ref{lst:extracted_record} shows a simplified extracted address with selected fields.\n\n\\begin{listing}[t]\n\\begin{lstlisting}[style=code, numbers=none, gobble=0]\n_:b0 rdf:type schema:LocalBusiness <example.de/page> .\n_:b0 schema:name \"NAME\" <example.de/page> .\n_:b0 schema:address _:b1 <example.de/page> .\n_:b1 rdf:type schema:PostalAddress <example.de/page> .\n_:b1 schema:streetAddress \"STREET\" <example.de/page> .\n_:b1 schema:addressLocality \"CITY\" <example.de/page> .\n\\end{lstlisting}\n\\vspace{-10pt}\n\\caption{N-Quads example from the \\texttt{LocalBusiness} Schema.org subset. The address node\n(\\texttt{\\_:b1}) is linked to its parent entity (\\texttt{\\_:b0}) via\n\\texttt{schema:address}.}\n\\label{lst:nquads_example}\n\\end{listing}\n\n\\begin{listing}[t]\n\\begin{lstlisting}[language=Python, style=code, numbers=none, gobble=0]\n{\n \"address\": {\n \"streetAddress\": \"STREET\",\n \"addressLocality\": \"CITY\",\n },\n \"name\": \"NAME\",\n \"graph_iri\": \"https://example.de/page\"\n}\n\\end{lstlisting}\n\\vspace{-10pt}\n\\caption{Address extracted from the example in Listing~\\ref{lst:nquads_example}.}\n\\label{lst:extracted_record}\n\\end{listing}\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{\\textsf{html-mf-adr} Microformats subset.}\nWDC also provides a format-specific dump for the \\texttt{html-mf-adr} microformat,\nwhere address fields are encoded as HTML class names and extracted\ninto the W3C vCard vocabulary, as shown in Listing~\\ref{lst:vcard_nquads}.\nThis subset covers 41M RDF statements in N-Quads format across nine shards.\nWe remapped vCard predicates to Schema.org field names to ensure a uniform structure across both sources.\n\nThis extraction phase yielded 247.9M \\textsf{schema:PostalAddress} entities from the Schema.org subsets and 11.8M \\textsf{vCard:Address} entities from the \\textsf{html-mf-adr} subset. After collecting its fields, we represent each extracted address entity as one dirty record.\n\n\\begin{listing}[t]\n\\begin{lstlisting}[style=code, numbers=none, gobble=0]\n_:b0 rdf:type vcard:Address <example.com/page> .\n_:b0 vcard:street-address \"STREET\" <example.com/page> .\n_:b0 vcard:locality \"CITY\" <example.com/page> .\n_:b0 vcard:country-name \"COUNTRY\" <example.com/page> .\n\\end{lstlisting}\n\\vspace{-10pt}\n\\caption{N-Quads example from the \\texttt{html-mf-adr} subset, using the\nW3C vCard vocabulary. Unlike Schema.org, no parent entity is linked, so the\nplace name is unavailable.}\n\\label{lst:vcard_nquads}\n\\end{listing}\n\n\\subsubsection{Address Filtering}\n\\label{sec:address-filtering}\nTo focus validation on records with sufficient spatial evidence, we retained only dirty records containing at least one core address signal: \\textsf{streetAddress}, \\textsf{addressLocality}, or \\textsf{postalCode}.\nThis filtering step removes records whose address information is too sparse to be meaningfully validated, while preserving the vast majority of usable records.\nAfter filtering, 219.9M dirty records remain from the Schema.org subsets (88.7\\% retention rate) and 8.5M from the \\textsf{html-mf-adr} subset (71.9\\% retention rate).\nTogether, they form a combined pool of 228.4M dirty records.\n\n\\subsection{Ground Truth Generation}\n\\label{sec:data_validation}\n\nTo generate the ground truth, we need to find a true representation for each address.\nThis would normally require the definition of a desired target representation, followed by the manual verification of each dirty address.\nUnfortunately, the latter is not scalable.\nAlternatively, one can compare each dirty address with the corresponding representation in a trusted source.\nThe challenge is ensuring that each address is correctly matched.\nFollowing this intuition, we resorted to a mixed approach, where we first tried to match each dirty address to its representation provided by a geocoding service, then applied manually crafted scripts to filter out inconsistencies.\n\n\\subsubsection{Geocoding Service Selection}\n\\label{sec:geocoding_selection}\nGenerating ground truth at this scale requires a geocoding service with broad geographic coverage, reliable address-level matches, and sufficient throughput for hundreds of millions of queries.\nWe therefore considered both proprietary geocoding services and open alternatives.\nProprietary services such as Google Places, HERE, and Geocode.xyz provide geocoding APIs, but their use at scale is constrained by a combination of licensing costs, rate limits, and regional coverage restrictions.\nSome services are optimized for specific countries or regions, while others become impractical for 228.4M queries under their public rate limits or pricing models.\nWe also considered three open alternatives:\n\\emph{(i)}~Overture Maps\\footnote{\\url{https://overturemaps.org}}, a dataset of approximately 446M addresses stored as GeoParquet files on S3, which can be queried offline via DuckDB;\n\\emph{(ii)}~OpenAddresses\\footnote{\\url{https://openaddresses.io}}, a collection of roughly one billion addresses distributed as GeoJSON files, also queryable via DuckDB; and\n\\emph{(iii)}~Nominatim\\footnote{\\url{https://github.com/osm-search/Nominatim}}, the geocoding front-end of OpenStreetMap (OSM), which is available as a public RESTful API and can also be self-hosted to support high-throughput querying.\n\nTo assess their suitability for generating ground truth at scale, we compared them on a stratified sample of 1\\emph{k} dirty addresses to preserve the original distribution of countries and points of interests (POIs).\nFor each service, we queried the sampled addresses and scored the returned matches based on fuzzy string similarity across house number, street name, postal code, and locality.\nNominatim was able to match with high confidence 96.5\\% of the dirty addresses. We further verified a random sample of 1\\emph{k}~addresses against the Google Address Validation API\\footnote{\\url{https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/address-validation}}, finding 99.1\\% agreement between the two sources.\nThe two alternatives showed substantial coverage gaps: Overture Maps and OpenAddresses covered only 39 and 19 countries, matching 10.8\\% and 33.4\\% of the dirty addresses, respectively.\nBoth significantly struggled with regions outside Europe.\n\nThe strong performance of Nominatim can be mainly attributed to two factors.\nFirst, OSM maintains rich POI data, such as hotels, restaurants, and public amenities, that align well with the entities in our dataset.\nSecond, the structured search endpoint provided by Nominatim accepts individual address fields, which reduces ambiguity compared to free text.\nBased on these findings, we selected Nominatim as the geocoding service for ground truth generation, and we deployed a self-hosted instance capable of handling several hundred requests per second.\n\n\\subsubsection{Geocoding Service Querying}\n\\label{sec:geocoding_querying}\n\n\\begin{listing}[t!]\n\\begin{lstlisting}[style=code,numbers=none,gobble=0]\n https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/search\n .... ?amenity=extracted.name\n .... &street=extracted.streetAddress\n .... &city=extracted.addressLocality\n .... &postalcode=extracted.postalCode\n .... &state=extracted.addressRegion\n .... &country=extracted.addressCountry\n .... &format=geojson\n .... &limit=1\n .... &addressdetails=1\n .... &extratags=1\n\\end{lstlisting}\n\n\\vspace{-10pt}\n\\caption{The parameters used to query each dirty address through the Nominatim API.}\n\\label{fig:nominatim_search}\n\\end{listing}\n\nFor each dirty record, we queried the Nominatim API through its \\textsf{/search} endpoint to retrieve the corresponding representation in the OSM database.\nThe query template, which exploits the structured information provided by the \\textsf{PostalAddress} schema, is shown in Listing~\\ref{fig:nominatim_search}.\nBased on the additional parameters, Nominatim returns the closest match in JSON format. The result is a JSON object that includes address details and additional information about the location, such as opening hours.\nRelevant fields for our use case are:\n\\emph{(i)}~\\textsf{name}, i.e., the name associated\nwith the location;\n\\emph{(ii)}~\\textsf{place\\_rank}, an integer that reflects the granularity of the location (higher values correspond to more specific location types);\n\\emph{(iii)}~\\textsf{address}, a nested JSON object that includes the address details of the location.\nUnfortunately, the address details returned by Nominatim do not adhere to the PostalAddress schema.\nWe therefore need to perform schema alignment by defining appropriate mappings and transformations.\n\n\\subsubsection{Schema Alignment}\n\\label{sec:schema_alignment}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t!]\n \\tikzset{>=latex}\n \\centering\n \\begin{tikzpicture}[\n node distance=5cm and 3cm,\n every node/.style={draw, text width=2.0cm,\n central/.style={text width=2.0cm, fill=yellow!20, font=\\footnotesize},\n align=center, minimum height=0.5cm, font=\\footnotesize},\n align=center, thick, scale=0.70\n ]\n\n \\node[draw=none, text width=3cm] (col1) at (-4,10) {\\textbf{Extracted Addresses} \\\\ (Before alignment)};\n \\node[draw=none, text width=5cm] (col3) at (0,10) {\\textbf{Aligned Schema} \\\\};\n \\node[draw=none, text width=3cm] (col4) at (4,10) {\\textbf{OSM Addresses} \\\\ (Before alignment)};\n\n \\node (ex_name) at (-4,9) {name};\n \\node (osm_name) at (4,9) {name};\n \\node[central] (name) at (0,9) {name};\n \\draw[->] (osm_name) -- (name);\n \\draw[->] (ex_name) -- (name);\n\n \\node (ext1) at (-4,7.5) {streetAddress};\n \\node[central] (join1a) at (0,8) {road};\n \\node[central] (join1b) at (0,7) {house\\_number};\n \\node (osm1a) at (4,8) {road};\n \\node (osm1b) at (4,7) {house\\_number};\n \\draw[->] (ext1) -- (join1a);\n \\draw[->] (ext1) -- (join1b);\n \\draw[->] (osm1a) -- (join1a);\n \\draw[->] (osm1b) -- (join1b);\n\n \\node (ex_postcode) at (-4,6) {postalCode};\n \\node (osm_postcode) at (4,6) {postcode};\n \\node[central] (postcode) at (0,6) {postcode};\n \\draw[->] (osm_postcode) -- (postcode);\n \\draw[->] (ex_postcode) -- (postcode);\n\n \\node (ex_local) at (-4,4) {addressLocality};\n \\node[central] (local) at (0,4) {locality};\n \\node (osm_local) at (4,4) {city, town,\\\\\\textit{village}, \\textit{borough}\\\\\\textit{neighborhood}, \\textit{hamlet},\\\\\\textit{municipality}};\n \\draw[->] (ex_local) -- (local);\n \\draw[->] (osm_local) -- (local);\n\n \\node (osm_region) at (4,1.5) {region, state\\\\\\textit{county}, \\textit{province}, \\textit{state\\_district}};\n \\node (ex_region) at (-4,1.5) {addressRegion};\n \\node[central] (region) at (0,1.5) {region};\n \\draw[->] (osm_region) -- (region);\n \\draw[->] (ex_region) -- (region);\n\n \\node (ex_country) at (-4,-0.5) {addressCountry};\n \\node[central] (countryA) at (0,-0) {country};\n \\node[central] (countryB) at (0,-1) {country\\_code};\n\n \\node (osm_countryA) at (4,-0) {country};\n \\node (osm_countryB) at (4,-1) {country\\_code};\n \\draw[->] (osm_countryA) -- (countryA);\n \\draw[->] (osm_countryB) -- (countryB);\n \\draw[->] (ex_country) -- (countryA);\n \\draw[->] (ex_country) -- (countryB);\n\n \\end{tikzpicture}\n \\vspace{-.6cm}\n \\caption{Schema alignment between extracted addresses (dirty records) and OSM addresses (ground truth).}\n \\label{fig:schema_alignment}\n\\end{figure}\n\nFigure~\\ref{fig:schema_alignment} provides an overview of the designed alignment between the \\textsf{PostalAddress} schema and the address details returned by Nominatim.\nWhile \\textsf{name} and \\textsf{postcode} can be aligned directly, most fields require more refined strategies to handle structural differences.\nFor instance, OSM uses two independent fields to store the street name and the house number, which are instead combined into a single \\textsf{streetAddress} attribute in \\textsf{PostalAddress}.\nTo unify the two representations, we split \\textsf{streetAddress} into \\textsf{road} and \\textsf{house\\_number} to keep a more modular representation of the address.\nWe extracted the street name and house number from \\textsf{streetAddress} using libpostal\\footnote{\\url{https://github.com/openvenues/libpostal}}, a popular address parser.\nIf libpostal could not identify one of the two components, the corresponding value was set to \\textit{null} in the dirty version of the dataset.\n\nSimilarly, OSM stores both the country name and its ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code\\footnote{\\url{https://www.iso.org/iso-3166-country-codes.html}}, each in a dedicated field.\nIn contrast, \\textsf{PostalAddress} uses a single \\textsf{addressCountry} attribute, which can contain either the country name or its code.\nWe decided to keep both fields in the aligned schema and to move the \\textsf{addressCountry} value to \\textsf{country\\_code} if it matched with the required two-letter pattern.\n\nFinally, \\textsf{addressLocality} and \\textsf{addressRegion} attributes have many possible correspondences in OSM, listed in Figure~\\ref{fig:schema_alignment}.\nEach location returned by Nominatim can contain one or more of these fields, requiring a flexible approach to identify the most appropriate value for the ground truth.\nSpecifically, we favored the \\textsf{city} and \\textsf{town} (\\textsf{region} and \\textsf{state}) fields, semantically closer to the concept of locality (region) in \\textsf{PostalAddress}, considering the remaining ones only if none of them were present.\nThe edit distance from the extracted value, computed using the well-known Damerau-Levenshtein metric~\\cite{DBLP:journals/cacm/Damerau64}, was then used as the tie-breaking criterion in case multiple (non)preferred fields were present at the same time.\n\n\\subsubsection{Ground Truth Filtering}\n\\label{sec:ground_truth_filtering}\n\nAfter obtaining ground truth addresses from Nominatim, we applied a validation and normalization pipeline before constructing the benchmark dataset.\n\nFirst, we filtered out 183.8M addresses (about 80\\% of our queries) for which Nominatim did not return any matching location.\nTo further ensure completeness, we removed addresses whose corresponding ground truth entries were missing values for at least one attribute, excluding \\textsf{name}.\nIndeed, as \\textsf{name} was missing in more than 42\\% of the remaining entries, removing them would have significantly reduced the size of the dataset.\nWe opted therefore to create two versions of the dataset:\n\\emph{(i)}~\\textbf{\\dsnoname{}} (9,317,886 addresses), obtained by retaining all remaining addresses, dropping the \\textsf{name} attribute from both the extracted dirty dataset and the ground truth;\n\\emph{(ii)}~\\textbf{\\dsname{}} (4,338,109 addresses), obtained from the portion of addresses for which the name was present in the ground truth, after a further refinement step using name similarity as a heuristic to identify and remove inaccurate matches.\nWe measured similarity through token set ratio\\footnote{\\url{https://rapidfuzz.github.io/RapidFuzz/Usage/fuzz.html\\#token-set-ratio}} due to its robustness to different word ordering and partial overlaps.\nA perfect threshold (100\\%) was chosen after string normalization (lowercasing and converting to a canonical Unicode form) to ensure that distinct co-located entities were not mistakenly aligned.\nIn both dataset versions, duplicate addresses originating from the same source page and sharing identical attribute values in both the dirty dataset and the ground truth were removed.\n\nFinally, to further improve the consistency of the \\textsf{locality} attribute in the ground truth, we used publicly available country-based lists of recognized localities, e.g., Gemeinden in Germany\\footnote{\\url{https://public.opendatasoft.com/explore/assets/georef-germany-gemeinde/}} or places/subdivisions in the US\\footnote{\\url{https://public.opendatasoft.com/explore/assets/georef-united-states-of-america-place/} and \\url{https://public.opendatasoft.com/explore/assets/georef-united-states-of-america-county-subdivision/}}, to maintain the same level of granularity in the \\textsf{locality} attribute.\nFor each ground-truth entry, we checked the presence of a certified locality in that region from the list, allowing fuzzy matches based on containment or edit distance, and we updated the locality of that entry to the certified one in case it was reporting a different value.\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\footnotesize\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{8pt}\n\\caption{Number of distinct values for each attribute in the ground truth of the \\dsname{} and \\dsnoname{} datasets.}\n\\vspace{-.3cm}\n\n\\label{tab:distinct_values}\n\\begin{tabular}{lrrrrrrrrrr}\n\\toprule\nDataset version & \\textsf{\\_id} & \\textsf{name} & \\textsf{house\\_number} & \\textsf{road} & \\textsf{postcode} & \\textsf{locality} & \\textsf{region} & \\textsf{country} & \\textsf{country\\_code} & \\textsf{graph\\_iri}\\\\\n\\midrule\n\\dsname{} & 4,338,109 & 357,323 & 30,417 & 157,530 & 90,819 & 39,810 & 1,263& 128 & 127& 2,911,740\\\\\n\\dsnoname{} & 9,317,886 & --- & 74,539 & 412,231 & 152,099 & 61,579 & 1,461 & 135 &135 & 6,240,792\\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\subsection{Ethical Concerns}\n\\label{sec:ethical_concerns}\n\nIn alignment with prior work that analyzed the Common Crawl archives~\\cite{subramani-etal-2023-detecting}, we refrained from including any explicit personally identifiable information (PII), such as SSNs, emails, phone numbers, and banking information.\nAfter extraction, we also used the underlying PII detection library\\footnote{\\url{https://github.com/PovertyAction/PII_detection}} to identify unintentionally captured PII. No PII was detected.\nThe entities whose addresses we collected represent businesses and publicly known offices.\nFurthermore, we semi-automatically audited the entries to identify facilities, further confirming that the addresses do not belong to individuals.\n\nThe data from Common Crawl is used under its Terms of Use.\nIn accordance with the Open Database Licence (ODbL) 1.0 of OpenStreetMap, our ground truth dataset remains under ODbL in line with the share-alike requirements.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/dataset_statistics.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Dataset Statistics}\n\\label{sec:dataset-eval}\n\nIn this section, we report statistical insights from our analysis of the dataset in its different variations, i.e., \\dsname{} and \\dsnoname{}. As shown in Table~\\ref{tab:distinct_values}, the schema of the generated dataset reflects the attributes defined in the schema alignment step (Section~\\ref{sec:schema_alignment}): \\textsf{house\\_number}, \\textsf{road}, \\textsf{postcode}, \\textsf{locality}, \\textsf{region}, \\textsf{country}, and \\textsf{country\\_code}.\nThe \\textsf{name} attribute is present only in the \\dsname{} version.\nFurther, a unique identifier (\\textsf{\\_id}) is assigned to every record in the whole collection to serve as its identifier. We also track the source page URL as an attribute (\\textsf{graph\\_iri}) for each record.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/geo_dist.png}\n \\vspace{-.6cm}\n\n \\caption{Country distribution in the \\dsname{} dataset.}\n \\label{fig:geographic_distribution}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Geographic Distribution.}\nAlthough country-level coverage is uneven, the dataset is geographically diverse, with addresses spanning 128 countries worldwide. Figure~\\ref{fig:geographic_distribution} shows the geographic distribution of addresses in the \\dsname{} version. If needed, one can readily sample a balanced subset over \\emph{x} countries that remains larger than many existing cleaning datasets.\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Cardinalities.} Table~\\ref{tab:distinct_values} reports the number of distinct values per attribute in the ground truth of the \\dsname{} and \\dsnoname{} versions.\nWith the only exception of the identifier, no attribute is unique.\nAt the record level, filtering out \\textsf{\\_id} and \\textsf{graph\\_iri} attributes, we can count 427,885 and 1,457,806 distinct records in the ground truth of the \\dsname{} and \\dsnoname{} versions, respectively.\nIn the \\dsname{} version, multiple named entities can be located at the same address.\nOn average, each distinct address hosts 1.03 distinct entities, with a maximum of 51 co-located entities.\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Functional Dependencies.} Our dataset presents multiple functional dependencies (FDs), which can serve to detect errors and generate repairs in rule-based tools.\nThe \\dsname{} version contains 14 FDs for \\textsf{country} and 10 for \\textsf{country\\_code}, involving one (e.g., \\textsf{country} $\\rightarrow$ \\textsf{country\\_code}\\footnote{Note that the rule \\textsf{country\\_code} $\\rightarrow$ \\textsf{country} does not hold instead, due to an exception, \\textsf{Northern~Cyprus}, which is associated with the same ISO code as \\textsf{Cyprus}.}), two (e.g., \\textsf{postcode}, \\textsf{locality} $\\rightarrow$ \\textsf{country}), or three attributes on the left-hand side (e.g., \\textsf{house\\_number}, \\textsf{road}, \\textsf{postcode} $\\rightarrow$ \\textsf{country}).\nCountry-based subsets may contain additional dependencies. For example, in German addresses \\textsf{region} can be functionally determined by \\textsf{postcode} and \\textsf{locality}.\nThe full lists of FDs for the representative dataset variations described in the paper are publicly available in our GitHub repository.\n\n\\subsection{Dataset Slices}\n\\label{sec:dataset_variations}\n\nFor a finer-grained analysis, we readily sampled and made available multiple subsets of the \\dsname{} dataset based on specific dimensions, such as the country and the type of point of interest (POI), to use them in our experimental evaluation.\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Country-based Slices.}\nWe first considered the geographic dimension, producing dedicated subsets for the two most represented countries (US and Germany).\nAs shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:geographic_distribution}, the two slices (denoted as \\textsf{us-slice} and \\textsf{de-slice}) are composed of 2,267,895 and 374,533 addresses, respectively.\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{POI-based Slices.}\nWe also created slices for 22 different types of POI, reflecting class-specific Schema.org subsets identified by WDC.\n This way, researchers can further explore specific cleaning strategies by augmenting certain entities with their type-specific properties~\\cite{DBLP:journals/pvldb/LiC25, DBLP:journals/pvldb/LiuPCY17}.\nIn our analysis, we focus on \\textsf{library} and \\textsf{shopping-center}, which cover all identified error types.\n\n\\subsection{Error Statistics}\n\\label{subsec:err-rate-analysis}\n\nTo demonstrate the usefulness of our generated dataset, we analyze the characteristics of its errors. We report the overall error rate for the \\dsname{} and \\dsnoname{} variants and the error rate for individual address fields.\nTo capture not only frequency but also the nature of errors, we analyze the distribution of \\textit{error types}.\nIn general, we compare the \\emph{dirty} value in each cell with the corresponding \\emph{clean} value from the ground truth. Cells that do not match exactly are counted as errors.\n\n\\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*]\n \\item \\textbf{\\dsname{}} -- Across 4,338,109 addresses with eight fields, hence 34,704,872 cells in total, \\textbf{51.1\\%} of the cells are clean, i.e., they match the ground truth, while \\textbf{48.9\\%} contain errors.\n \\item \\textbf{\\dsnoname{}} -- Across 9,317,886 addresses with seven fields, hence 65,225,202 cells in total, \\textbf{47.3\\%} of the cells are clean, while \\textbf{52.7\\%} contain errors.\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\subsubsection{Error Categories}\n\\label{subsec:err-type-analysis}\n\nTo characterize the errors present in our dataset, we apply a \\emph{hierarchical, rule-based} classifier that assigns each cell to exactly one error category. Because a single cell can be subject to multiple errors simultaneously, e.g., a token reordering that also introduces a capitalization change, mutual exclusivity is enforced by a strict priority cascade: each rule is evaluated in the order listed below, and the first rule leading to a match with the ground truth determines the label. This design prevents double-counting and makes the classification reproducible, ensuring that aggregate statistics are fully comparable across dataset slices.\n\nBefore any rule is applied, both the dirty and clean value are normalized deterministically: zero-width and non-breaking space characters are removed or replaced with regular spaces, whitespace runs are collapsed, and Unicode NFC normalization is applied. This step is intentionally case- and punctuation-preserving so that purely cosmetic differences are absorbed into the \\emph{Clean} category rather than triggering downstream rules.\n\nThe taxonomy comprises 12 mutually exclusive categories, applied in the following priority order:\n\n\\smallskip\n\n\\noindent\n\\emph{Clean} $\\to$\n\\emph{Missing} $\\to$\n\\emph{Parsing} $\\to$\n\\emph{Capitalization} $\\to$\n\\emph{Special Chars} $\\to$\n\\emph{Name Reformat} $\\to$\n\\emph{Language} $\\to$\n\\emph{Abbreviation} $\\to$\n\\emph{Token Subset} $\\to$\n\\emph{Typo} $\\to$\n\\emph{Word Substitution} $\\to$\n\\emph{Miscellaneous}\n\n\\smallskip\n\n\\noindent\nWe begin by separating exact matches and missing values, which can be identified without applying any transformation. Next come deterministic representation changes such as parsing issues, capitalization, punctuation, and name reformatting. These must be resolved early to avoid misclassifying them into broader, less precise categories such as typos. Language variations and abbreviations, which produce values that are lexically distinct but semantically equivalent, are evaluated before token-subset and edit-distance-based typo rules. Finally, typos, word substitutions, and miscellanea capture progressively less constrained differences, serving as a catch-all for cases not resolved by the earlier, more specific rules.\nNext, we explain each category in detail.\n\n\\begin{enumerate}[leftmargin=*]\n\n \\item \\textbf{Clean} -- The normalized dirty value is identical to the normalized ground truth. No error is present.\n\n \\item \\textbf{Missing} -- The dirty value is empty after normalization. This error type is placed first, as applying any subsequent rule to an empty string would be meaningless.\n\n \\item \\textbf{Parsing} -- The dirty value contains an artifact resulting from an incorrectly identified character encoding, e.g., \\textsf{M\\%C3\\%BCnchen} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{München}, \\textsf{Caf\\&\\#233;} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{Café}.\n Equality with the ground truth is restored after an appropriate decoding step.\n\n \\item \\textbf{Capitalization} -- The two values are identical under Unicode case folding~\\cite{unicode2024}, e.g., \\textsf{ATLANTA} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{Atlanta}, \\textsf{10a} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{10A}.\n\n \\item \\textbf{Special Characters} -- The two values are identical under case folding after removing all Unicode punctuation, symbol, and whitespace characters from both, e.g., \\textsf{Notre-Dame Street} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{Notre Dame Street}, \\textsf{U.S.A.} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{USA}.\n This rule fires for differences that are entirely attributable to punctuation usage conventions.\n\n \\item \\textbf{Name Reformat} -- The multiset of accent-folded, lowercased word-level tokens is identical for both values, despite different ordering in the original strings, e.g., \\textsf{Howson Branch, Austin Public Library} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{Austin Public Library -- Howson Branch}, \\textsf{South 37th Avenue} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{37th Avenue South}.\n\n \\item \\textbf{Language} -- The two values refer to the same entity but differ due to a language variation, such as a translation, an exonym, or a romanisation, e.g., \\textsf{Austria} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{\\\"{O}sterreich}, \\textsf{Athens} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{$A\\theta\\acute{\\eta}\\nu\\alpha$}.\n Resolving language variations before abbreviations prevents short tokens in a non-Latin script from being claimed by the abbreviation lookup, which operates on Latin-script expansions.\n\n \\item \\textbf{Abbreviation} -- The two values are equal after standardized address-form expansion via libpostal~\\cite{barrington2017libpostal}, e.g., \\textsf{Ave} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{Avenue}, \\textsf{Bachmannstr.} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{Bachmannstraße}.\n\n \\item \\textbf{Token Subset} -- One token multiset is a strict subset of the other, e.g., \\textsf{New York} $\\subset$ \\textsf{New York City}, \\textsf{Finavia} $\\subset$ \\textsf{Finavia Oyj}. Structural containment is a stronger indicator than a small edit distance: resolving such cases before typos prevents us from incorrectly labeling them as typographical errors.\n\n \\item \\textbf{Typo} -- The two normalized strings differ by at most two edit operations (substitution, insertion, deletion, or adjacent transposition) under the Damerau--Levenshtein distance~\\cite{levenshtein1966binary,DBLP:journals/cacm/Damerau64}, e.g., \\textsf{Theater} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{Theatre}, \\textsf{Marriott} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{Mariot}.\n\n \\item \\textbf{Word Substitution} -- Exactly one token differs between the two multisets while at least one token is shared, e.g., \\textsf{VA Clinic} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{Outpatient Clinic}. This category captures factual inaccuracies, but also morphological variants, derivational forms, and near-synonyms that represent the same concept.\n\n \\item \\textbf{Miscellaneous} -- Any cell-level difference that does not satisfy any of the preceding rules is assigned this residual category. It subsumes cases such as cross-source conflicts, e.g., \\textsf{California} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{Highway 76}, administrative reassignments, e.g., \\textsf{Strathroy} $\\leftrightarrow$ \\textsf{Adelaide Metcalfe}, OCR-style corruptions, etc.\n\n\\end{enumerate}\n\nOur categories build on prior work on error detection and taxonomies, but are more fine-granular and tailored to cell-level differences. Bhadauria et al.~\\cite{DBLP:journals/corr/abs-2604-09277} provide a broader catalog of errors. Our taxonomy covers a subset observable through cell-wise address comparison and focuses on the cause of the error and not the type they belong to based on the algorithm that exposes them, such as rule violation or outliers~\\cite{AbedjanCDFIOPST16}.\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\scriptsize\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{4pt}\n\\caption{Distribution of error types across dataset variations (percentages of total cells). \\emph{Parsing} is also reported as an absolute count due to its negligible overall frequency. Statistics for other POI-based slices are available on GitHub.}\n\\vspace{-.3cm}\n\n\\label{tab:facility-error-summary}\n\\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{\n\\begin{tabular}{lrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr}\n\\toprule\nSlice & Num-rows & Clean & Missing & Parsing (\\#) & Parsing (\\%) & Capitalization & Special Chars & Name Reformat & Language & Abbreviation & Token Subset & Typo & Word Subst. & Misc \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\dsname{} & 4{,}338{,}109 & 51.1\\% & 23.7\\% & 8830 & 0.025\\% & 2.1\\% & 0.8\\% & 0.6\\% & 6.9\\% & 9.3\\% & 2.6\\% & 1.2\\% & 0.2\\% & 1.5\\% \\\\\n\\dsnoname{} & 9{,}317{,}886 & 47.3\\% & 28.6\\% & 500 & 0.001\\% & 1.7\\% & 0.8\\% & 0.3\\% & 6.4\\% & 9.5\\% & 1.8\\% & 1.3\\% & 0.4\\% & 1.9\\% \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\usslice{} & 2{,}267{,}895 & 52.9\\% & 20.1\\% & 6940 & 0.038\\% & 1.0\\% & 0.5\\% & 0.1\\% & 7.0\\% & 14.9\\% & 2.2\\% & 0.7\\% & 0.0\\% & 0.5\\% \\\\\n\\deslice{} & 374{,}533 & 53.5\\% & 30.0\\% & 91 & 0.003\\% & 1.9\\% & 1.2\\% & 0.3\\% & 5.3\\% & 1.2\\% & 2.7\\% & 0.3\\% & 0.0\\% & 3.6\\% \\\\\n\\ruslice{} & 194,274 & 51.9\\% & 29.6\\% & 0 & 0.000\\% & 7.8\\% & 0.3\\% & 0.1\\% & 2.2\\% & 0.4\\% & 0.7\\% & 6.4\\% & 0.2\\% & 0.3\\% \\\\\n\n\\midrule\n\\library{} & 5{,}370 & 51.7\\% & 27.3\\% & 10 & 0.023\\% & 2.8\\% & 0.4\\% & 0.6\\% & 2.0\\% & 5.8\\% & 1.6\\% & 1.1\\% & 0.0\\% & 6.6\\% \\\\\n\\shoppingcenter{} & 3{,}478 & 45.8\\% & 22.4\\% & 13 & 0.047\\% & 3.1\\% & 0.2\\% & 7.3\\% & 4.2\\% & 7.1\\% & 2.5\\% & 6.5\\% & 0.2\\% & 0.6\\% \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{figures/full_heatmap.png}\n \\vspace{-.8cm}\n \\caption{Percentages of clean and erroneous cells (grouped by error type) per attribute in the \\dsname{} dataset.}\\label{fig:full-heatmap}\n\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsubsection{Error Category Distributions}\n\nWe now report the ratios of the defined error types for the full dataset and its slices.\n\n\\subsubsection*{Full Dataset}\nFigure~\\ref{fig:full-heatmap} summarizes the cell-wise comparison over all attributes between the extracted dataset and its ground truth for the \\dsname{} version. The \\dsnoname{} version shows a very similar distribution. The largest drift between the \\emph{dirty} and \\emph{clean} version of the dataset is due to representation issues and missing values. Common issues include abbreviated or shortened forms of street and region names, partial or omitted locality fields, and inconsistent capitalization or punctuation. Textual attributes such as \\textsf{region} and \\textsf{country} are the most affected, often due to incomplete or shortened representations of organizations and administrative divisions. In contrast, structured fields, such as \\textsf{house\\_number}, \\textsf{postcode}, and \\textsf{locality}, tend to be considerably cleaner, with most inconsistencies limited to minor formatting or typographic deviations. The \\textsf{country\\_code} value is frequently missing, reflecting the common omission of standardized codes on Web sources.\n\n\\subsubsection*{Country-based Slices}\nThe distribution of error types in addresses from \\usslice{} is very similar to the one in the full dataset, where US addresses represent more than the half of the entries.\nUS addresses show a significantly higher rate of abbreviations, especially in the \\textsf{region} attribute (74.6\\%), but also for \\textsf{road} (25.3\\%) and \\textsf{country} (19\\%). For instance, addresses inconsistently use abbreviations for street components, such as ``W'' for ``West'' or ``Blvd.'' for ``Boulevard''.\nThe abbreviation rate is much lower in \\deslice{}, e.g., 9.2\\% for \\textsf{road} or close to 0\\% for \\textsf{region} and \\textsf{country}, which shows instead a high rate of missing values for \\textsf{region} (70.3\\%). Indeed, for \\emph{free cities}, such as Berlin and Hamburg, the region coincides with the city itself and is therefore omitted for practical reasons. Another distinguishing factor is the overall clean ratio for street names (61.8\\%). An interesting observation concerns the orthography of the word ``street'' (``Stra{\\ss}e'') in German and Swiss addresses. While German addresses strictly adhere to the usage of ``\\ss'' instead of ``ss'' in the ground truth, Swiss addresses do the opposite. The correspondingly wrong usage can be observed in the dirty version of the dataset.\n\n\\subsubsection*{POI-based Slices}\n\nIn Table~\\ref{tab:facility-error-summary}, we report the distribution of error types for the two POI-based slices (\\textsf{library} and \\textsf{shopping-center}) used in our experiments.\nStatistics for the other 20 slices are available on GitHub.\nMissing values are by far the most common error type across all slices, ranging from 16\\% to 49.1\\% of the cells, with the highest rates concentrated in sport-related slices.\nAbbreviations are dominating among representational inconsistencies (median 9.2\\%, up to 13.8\\%), while typos are rare in most slices (median 0.8\\%, up to 6.9\\%).\nThe remaining categories vary substantially by POI type.\nLanguage variations range from 2\\% to 16.2\\% across slices, reaching the highest values in tourism-related slices, such as \\textsf{ski-resort}, often referenced from multiple countries.\nFocusing on the two selected slices, \\textsf{library} combines a high rate of missing values (27.3\\%) with the largest amount of miscellaneous errors across all slices (6.6\\%), while \\textsf{shopping-center} exhibits the highest rate of name reformatting (7.3\\%) and the second-highest rate of typos (6.5\\%), together with a lower rate of clean cells (45.8\\% vs.\\ 51.7\\%).\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/experiments.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Experimental Analysis}\\label{sec:experiments}\nTo demonstrate the utility of our benchmark dataset, we conducted an extensive set of experiments and evaluated the effectiveness and scalability of state-of-the-art data cleaning systems across different subsets. We selected representative systems for rule-based, learning-based, and LLM-driven approaches, and assessed their performance in terms of effectiveness, runtime, and memory usage.\n\n\\subsubsection*{Setup}\\label{sec:setup}\nAll dataset variations and source code for dataset extraction, ground truth generation, analysis, and experiments are publicly available on\nGitHub.\nThe code is implemented in Python. Runtime experiments were executed on a server equipped with an AMD EPYC 7702P 64-core processor and 512~GB of RAM.\nRAID-configured SSDs were used for storage.\n\n\\subsection{Datasets}\nTo evaluate state-of-the-art cleaning systems across different scenarios, we created the samples summarized in Table~\\ref{tab:dataset_slices}.\nFor effectiveness experiments, we used samples of 10\\emph{k} records of \\dsname{}, \\deslice{}, and \\ruslice{}.\nThe latter contains Russian addresses and was selected to assess how cleaning systems perform on a non-Latin address subset.\nSince US addresses already represent the majority in \\dsname{}, we exclude the results on \\usslice{} for brevity.\nAs the error rate in the original dataset is rather high (about 50\\% of the cells), we also generated samples at lower error rates by proportionally replacing erroneous cells with the corresponding ground truth values.\nFor example, on a dataset with 100 cells among which 50 are marked as erroneous, hence presenting a 50\\% error rate, a 20\\% error rate would be obtained by randomly restoring 30 of the 50 erroneous cells to their ground truth values.\nWe additionally report on two POI-based slices, \\library{} and \\shoppingcenter{}, which differ with regard to their error-type distributions, to assess system behavior on domain-specific data.\n\nFor scalability experiments, we considered random \\dsname{} samples of 10\\emph{k}, 100\\emph{k}, 500\\emph{k}, and 1M records.\nAll datasets have eight columns: we excluded \\textsf{\\_id} and \\textsf{graph\\_iri} from all experiments, as both are always clean.\nFor the effectiveness experiments, we additionally filtered out records that were exact duplicates in their dirty version after the removal of the \\textsf{\\_id} and \\textsf{graph\\_iri} columns.\nThis determines the error rates marked as original* in Table~\\ref{tab:dataset_slices}, which are slightly different from those reported in Table~\\ref{tab:facility-error-summary}.\n\n\\begin{table}[t!]\n\\centering\n\\scriptsize\n\\caption{Overview of dataset samples used in the experiments. For the effectiveness experiments, records that were exact duplicates in their dirty version after the removal of the \\textsf{\\_id} and \\textsf{graph\\_iri} columns were filtered out before sampling.}\n\\vspace{-.2cm}\n\\label{tab:dataset_slices}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.1}\n\\begin{tabular}{lccr}\n\\hline\n\\textbf{Dataset} & \\textbf{Error Rate} & \\textbf{\\#Rows} & \\textbf{\\#Columns} \\\\\n\\hline\n\\multicolumn{4}{l}{\\textit{Effectiveness Experiments}} \\\\\n\\hline\n\\dsname{} & 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.51 (original*) & 10,000 & 8 \\\\\n\\deslice{} & 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.48 (original*) & 10,000 & 8 \\\\\n\\ruslice{} & 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.65 (original*) & 10,000 & 8 \\\\\n\\library{} & 0.64 (original*) & 1,656 & 8 \\\\\n\\shoppingcenter{} & 0.64 (original*) & 802 & 8 \\\\\n\\hline\n\\multicolumn{4}{l}{\\textit{Scalability Experiments}} \\\\\n\\hline\n\\dsname{} (All) & 0.49 & 4,338,109 & 8 \\\\\n\\dsname{} (1M) & 0.49 & 1,000,000 & 8 \\\\\n\\dsname{} (500$k$) & 0.49 & 500,000 & 8 \\\\\n\\dsname{} (100$k$) & 0.49 & 100,000 & 8 \\\\\n\\dsname{} (10$k$) & 0.49 & 10,000 & 8 \\\\\n\\hline\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\subsection{Baselines}\nIn our experiments, we considered several state-of-the-art data cleaning systems\nin representation of rule-based, learning-based, and LLM-driven approaches.\n\n\\subsubsection*{Rule-based Approaches}\n\\hfill\\\\\n\\noindent{\\textbf{Horizon}}~\\cite{DBLP:journals/pvldb/RezigOAEMS21} is a scalable rule-based system that generates repairs in linear time. We used the implementation provided by the authors\\footnote{\\url{https://github.com/D2IP-TUB/Horizon}}. As input, Horizon requires a set of FDs: we extracted them from the clean version of each sample using TANE~\\cite{DBLP:journals/cj/HuhtalaKPT99}, relying on a third-party Python implementation\\footnote{\\url{https://github.com/codocedo/tane}}.\n\n\\noindent{\\textbf{UniClean}}~\\cite{DBLP:journals/pvldb/DingQWCTSHW25} is a system for building efficient data cleaning workflows. We classify it as rule-based because it requires predefined rules and constraints as input. We used the official implementation\\footnote{\\url{https://github.com/qzkinhit/UniClean-bench-Result}} with its default configuration and the same set of FDs used for Horizon. In addition, we enabled pattern-based and missing-value cleaners, as UniClean supports multiple error types.\nFor datasets where UniClean did not finish within the allocated time budget of 10 hours under its initial configuration, we reduced the workload by incrementally modifying three settings. First, we changed the sampling mode, choosing whether UniClean derives the repair plan from a quality-based coreset or from the full data directly. Second, we simplified the set of FDs by removing those with three or more attributes on the left-hand side. Third, we adjusted the block-size threshold \\textsf{single\\_max}. When repairing a target attribute or attribute group, UniClean applies all rules jointly if the sampled block contains fewer than \\textsf{single\\_max} rows; otherwise, it applies the rules one at a time.\nFor each dataset we applied these changes incrementally in the presented order, stopping as soon as the run completed within the time budget. The final configuration used for each dataset is available in our repository.\n\\subsubsection*{Learning-based Approaches}\n\\hfill\\\\\n\\noindent{\\textbf{HoloClean}}~\\cite{DBLP:journals/pvldb/RekatsinasCIR17} is an error correction system that combines integrity constraints, external data sources, and statistical profiles in a unified factor graph model to infer the most likely repairs for detected errors. We used the original implementation\\footnote{\\url{https://github.com/HoloClean/holoclean}} and provided it with the same FDs used for Horizon and UniClean.\n\n\\noindent{\\textbf{Raha}}~\\cite{DBLP:conf/sigmod/MahdaviAFMOS019} and \\textbf{Baran}~\\cite{DBLP:journals/pvldb/MahdaviA20}\nare semi-supervised systems for error detection and correction, respectively. Both formulate detection and correction as classification tasks and learn data-specific patterns to identify and repair erroneous cells. All experiments were conducted using their official implementation\\footnote{\\url{https://github.com/BigDaMa/raha}}. As recommended by the authors, we ran each experiment with 20 labeled tuples per task to train the corresponding models.\n\n\\noindent{\\textbf{DataWig}}~\\cite{DBLP:journals/jmlr/BiessmannRSNSTL19} is a data imputation method based on deep learning. We used the official implementation\\footnote{\\url{https://github.com/awslabs/datawig}} and the SimpleImputer module for our experiments. We used 20 labeled tuples for training and validation. For each column, the imputer was trained to predict its values based on all remaining columns. We then used the calibrated probability scores provided by the imputer to filter predictions, setting the threshold to 0.5. Among the remaining predictions, those differing from the original values were considered as detected errors. For the correction task, we then used the trained models to predict repairs for all actual erroneous cells in the dataset.\n\n\\subsubsection*{LLM-driven Approaches}\n\\hfill\\\\\n\\noindent{\\textbf{Glock's}}~\\cite{glock2150detecting} recently used LLMs to detect and correct errors in personal contact information datasets, a use case with which our dataset closely aligns. The proposed approach prompts LLMs to process each record individually, providing table-level rules and descriptions to guide both detection and correction. We used the official implementation\\footnote{\\url{https://github.com/Anna-Christina-Glock/pci-llm-toolkit}} and adapted the prompts to fit our dataset, making the edited versions publicly available in our repository. Experiments were conducted using Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite. In preliminary tests, we had observed very similar results between Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-5-mini. We opted for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite due to its faster response times.\n\n\\begin{table*}[t!]\n\\scriptsize\n\\centering\n\\caption{Error detection and correction results across POI-based slices.}\n\\vspace{-.3cm}\n\n\\label{tab:facility_results}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.1}\n\\begin{tabular}{l|lccc|lccc}\n\\hline\n\\textbf{Dataset} & \\textbf{Error Detection System} & \\textbf{Precision} & \\textbf{Recall} & \\textbf{F1-Score} & \\textbf{Error Correction System} & \\textbf{Precision} & \\textbf{Recall} & \\textbf{F1-Score} \\\\\n\\hline\n\\multirow{6}{*}{\\library{}}\n& Raha & 0.92 & 0.91 & 0.91 & Baran & 0.14 & 0.11 & 0.12 \\\\\n& Horizon & 0.49 & 0.54 & 0.51 & Horizon & 0.01 & 0.005 & 0.007 \\\\\n& DataWig & 0.66 & 0.97 & 0.79 & DataWig &0.30 & 0.29 &0.29 \\\\\n& HoloClean & 0.88 & 0.73 & 0.80 & HoloClean & 0.001 & 0.001 & 0.001\\\\\n& Glock's &0.97 & 0.56 &0.71 & Glock's & 0.31 & 0.27 & 0.29\\\\\n& UniClean & 0.73 & 0.86 & 0.79 & UniClean & 0.005 & 0.03 & 0.009 \\\\\n\\hline\n\\multirow{6}{*}{\\shoppingcenter{}}\n& Raha & 0.90 & 0.90 & 0.90 & Baran & 0.47 & 0.35 & 0.40 \\\\\n& Horizon & 0.54 & 0.65 & 0.59 & Horizon & 0.004 & 0.003 & 0.003 \\\\\n& DataWig & 0.67 & 0.98 & 0.80 & DataWig & 0.28 & 0.27 & 0.27 \\\\\n& HoloClean & 0.91 & 0.70 & 0.79 & HoloClean & 0.01 & 0.003 & 0.004 \\\\\n& Glock's & 0.98 & 0.60 & 0.74 & Glock's & 0.27 & 0.24& 0.25\\\\\n& UniClean & 0.95 & 0.67 & 0.78 & UniClean & 0.01 & 0.02 & 0.01 \\\\\n\\hline\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\subsection{Effectiveness Experiments}\n\n\\input{sections/experiments_ed_effectiveness}\nWe evaluate the effectiveness of all baselines for both error detection and correction across different error rates, country slices, and POI-based slices. We ran each system three times and report the average. For holistic systems such as UniClean and Horizon, which do not explicitly output detected errors, we derive detection results from the repairs they perform: whenever a system changes a cell value, we count that cell as detected.\n\n\\subsubsection{Cleaning Effectiveness w.r.t.\\ Error Rate.} Figure~\\ref{fig:effectiveness} illustrates the effectiveness of all baselines in both error detection and correction on samples from \\dsname{}, \\deslice{}, and \\ruslice{}. The \\emph{x}-axis represents the cell-level error rate, while the \\emph{y}-axis shows the F1-score.\nAs expected, all systems perform better on \\deslice{} and \\ruslice: within the same country, patterns and rules for addresses are more homogeneous, which makes the data inherently easier to clean.\n\n\\paragraph{Error Detection.} Among detection baselines, Raha shows the strongest performance across all slices. The LLM-based approach by Glock et al.\\ is the second strongest detector. On \\deslice{}, it reaches an F1-score of 0.77-0.82 and remains close to Raha across all error rates. DataWig, HoloClean, UniClean, and Horizon start from substantially lower F1-scores at small error rates, but their performance improves as the amount of errors increases. For example, on \\deslice{} DataWig's F1-score rises from 0.13 at a 5\\% error rate to 0.68 at 48\\%. This trend can be explained by class imbalance. At low error rates, erroneous cells are rare. Thus, even high-recall detectors may suffer from low precision, since many flagged cells are clean. As the error rate increases, the share of erroneous cells grows, precision improves, and the F1-score rises accordingly. This effect is less visible for Raha, which maintains competitive precision even at low error rates due to its semi-supervised strategy.\n\n\\paragraph{Error Correction.} To evaluate correction quality independently from detection, we provide the systems with the list of actual erroneous cells.\nIn contrast to detection, which benefits from class imbalance at higher error rates, correction performance degrades as the error rate increases.\nMost correction systems rely on the assumption that the dataset contains enough clean and redundant evidence to infer the correct value. As the error rate increases, this evidence becomes less reliable, hence correction gets harder.\n\nBaran achieves the strongest average performance across all slices. On \\deslice{}, Baran and Glock's\\ perform similarly, with average F1-scores of 69\\% and 68\\%, respectively. UniClean ranks third with 53\\%.\nA similar trend is registered on \\ruslice{}, with Baran (45\\%) outperforming UniClean (39\\%) and Glock's\\ (37\\%).\nThe lower scores registered on \\ruslice{} compared to \\deslice{} are mainly due to the fact that its columns generally present higher distinct value ratios, providing therefore less evidence to support correction.\nFinally, Baran reaches an average F1-score of 46\\% on \\dsname{}, followed by Glock's\\ with 42\\% and DataWig with 18\\%.\n\nBaran's strong performance shows the benefits of using signals within the dataset when enough clean context is available. Its performance drops for higher error rates, because the same internal signals become noisier as more cells are corrupted.\nGlock's\\ is more robust against increases in error rates because each record is processed independently and the method relies on knowledge acquired during pretraining rather than on evidence present in the dataset. DataWig also remains relatively stable, because we used a fixed training budget across all error rates.\n\nRule-based approaches perform poorly in correction because their applicability is limited by the available dependencies and by the values present in the data. FDs do not cover all attributes. Thus, errors in attributes such as \\textsf{house\\_number}, \\textsf{name}, or \\textsf{postcode} cannot be repaired, as they are not captured by any rule. Even when a rule applies, the system can only infer a correction if enough clean and consistent evidence exists elsewhere in the dataset. This assumption is often violated in our benchmark, which contains heterogeneous addresses from different countries, together with a high number of missing values, abbreviations, and noisy variants. These results show a limitation shared by many correction methods: they rely on the dataset itself to provide reliable correction evidence, hence their effectiveness decreases when the data is noisy, incomplete, or internally inconsistent.\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n\\centering\n\\caption{Error detection (recall) and correction (F1-score) performance across error types.}\\label{tab:poi-err-type-res}\n\\vspace{-.3cm}\n\n\\scriptsize\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.0}\n\\begin{tabular}{c l l l cccccccccc}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Dataset} & \\textbf{Task} & \\textbf{Method}\n& Missing & Parsing & Capitalization & Special Chars & Name Reformat & Language & Abbreviation & Token Subset & Typo & Word Subst. & Miscellaneous \\\\\n\\midrule\n\n\\multirow{12}{*}{\\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{\\library{}}}\n & \\multirow{5}{*}{\\shortstack{Detection\\\\\\textit{(Recall)}}} & Raha & 0.995 & 0.286 & 0.813 & 0.594 & 0.649 & 0.504 & 0.949 & 0.580 & 0.106 & 0.524 & 0.653 \\\\\n & & Horizon & 0.332 & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} & 0.970 & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{0.993} \\\\\n & & DataWig & 0.994 & 0.667 & 0.937 & 0.894 & 0.846 & 0.891 & \\textbf{0.995} & 0.844 & 0.951 & 0.952 & 0.989 \\\\\n & & HoloClean & 0.959 & 0.000 & 0.137 & 0.033 & 0.142 & 0.102 & 0.390 & 0.223 & 0.244 & 0.000 & 0.395 \\\\\n & & Glock's & 0.995 & 0.000 & 0.003 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.013 & 0.061 & 0.006 & 0.081 & 0.143 & 0.175 \\\\\n & & UniClean & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} & 0.551 & 0.683 & 0.544 & 0.570 & 0.501 & 0.579 & 0.512 & 0.571 & 0.626 \\\\\n\n \\cmidrule{2-14}\n & \\multirow{6}{*}{\\shortstack{Correction\\\\\\textit{(F1-Score)}}} & Baran & 0.072 & 0.000 & 0.043 & 0.065 & 0.019 & 0.172 & 0.712 & 0.041 & 0.089 & \\textbf{0.250} & \\textbf{0.427} \\\\\n & & Horizon & 0.010 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.014 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 \\\\\n & & DataWig & \\textbf{0.399} & 0.000 & 0.022 & 0.000 & 0.016 & 0.018 & 0.154 & 0.008 & 0.008 & 0.000 & 0.016 \\\\\n & & HoloClean & 0.001 & 0.000 & 0.004 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 \\\\\n & & Glock's & 0.219 & 0.000 & \\textbf{0.372} & \\textbf{0.117} & \\textbf{0.604} & \\textbf{0.330} & \\textbf{0.936} & \\textbf{0.100} & \\textbf{0.182} & 0.154 & 0.256 \\\\\n & & UniClean & 0.007 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 \\\\\n\n\\midrule\n\n\\multirow{12}{*}{\\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{\\shoppingcenter{}}}\n & \\multirow{6}{*}{\\shortstack{Detection\\\\\\textit{(Recall)}}} & Raha & \\textbf{1.000} & 0.267 & 0.872 & 0.477 & 0.575 & 0.679 & 0.798 & 0.434 & 0.253 & 0.921 & 0.747 \\\\\n & & Horizon & 0.460 & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{0.993} & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{0.992} & 0.961 & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} & \\textbf{1.000} & 0.962 \\\\\n & & DataWig & 0.996 & 0.833 & 0.958 & 0.879 & 0.925 & 0.949 & \\textbf{0.982} & 0.876 & 0.893 & 1.000 & \\textbf{0.983} \\\\\n & & HoloClean & 0.996 & 0.000 & 0.268 & 0.000 & 0.226 & 0.101 & 0.152 & 0.028 & 0.200 & 0.000 & 0.506 \\\\\n & & Glock's & 0.999 & 0.000 & 0.001 & 0.023 & 0.000 & 0.009 & 0.061 & 0.013 & 0.027 & 0.000 & 0.169 \\\\\n & & UniClean & \\textbf{1.000 }& \\textbf{1.000} & 0.056 & 0.250 & 0.016 & 0.050 & 0.094 & 0.022 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.544 \\\\\n \\cmidrule{2-14}\n & \\multirow{6}{*}{\\shortstack{Correction\\\\\\textit{(F1-Score)}}} & Baran & \\textbf{0.432} & 0.000 & \\textbf{0.219} & 0.029 & \\textbf{0.640} & 0.275 & 0.586 & 0.136 & 0.097 & 0.027 & \\textbf{0.429} \\\\\n & & Horizon & 0.004 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.006 & 0.006 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 \\\\\n & & DataWig & 0.400 & 0.067 & 0.035 & 0.023 & 0.038 & 0.028 & 0.117 & 0.020 & 0.071 & 0.035 & 0.160 \\\\\n & & HoloClean & 0.001 & 0.000 & 0.023 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 \\\\\n & & Glock's & 0.210 & 0.000 & 0.129 & \\textbf{0.300} & 0.225 & \\textbf{0.446} & \\textbf{0.762} & \\textbf{0.148} & \\textbf{0.105} & \\textbf{0.563} & 0.344 \\\\\n & & UniClean & 0.008 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.005 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.016 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\subsubsection{Cleaning Effectiveness on POI-based Slices and Different Error Types} We evaluate the systems on two POI-based slices: \\library{} (1,656 records, 13,248 cells) and \\shoppingcenter{} (802 records, 6,416 cells).\nThese POIs were selected because they exhibit complementary error profiles and together cover the main error types identified in our benchmark, as shown in Table~\\ref{tab:facility-error-summary}.\n\nTable~\\ref{tab:facility_results} reports the overall precision, recall, and F1-score for detection and correction on both slices. Table~\\ref{tab:poi-err-type-res} further breaks down the results by error type. For detection, we report recall per error type, since the goal is to measure how many errors are successfully identified for each category. Type-wise precision is not meaningful in this context, because false positives correspond to clean cells and therefore cannot be assigned to a specific error category. For correction, we report F1-score, as a predicted repair is only counted as correct if it matches the ground-truth value.\n\nFor several error types, Raha, UniClean, DataWig, and Horizon achieve high detection recall, yet the corresponding correction F1-scores remain low. For example, on \\library{} DataWig detects \\textit{Abbreviation} errors with a recall of 0.995, but reaches only a 0.154 F1-score in correcting them. Similarly, Horizon obtains near-perfect recall for several categories, but almost never produces successful repairs. Rule violations or distributional signals are often enough to identify suspicious cells, but not to infer the correct value.\n\nTable~\\ref{tab:poi-err-type-res} shows that correction quality strongly depends on the error type. Baran performs best on \\textit{Missing}, \\textit{Name Reformat}, and \\textit{Miscellaneous} errors on \\shoppingcenter{}, where useful evidence can be derived from recurring patterns in the dataset. Glock's\\ performs better on textual and semantic transformations, including \\textit{Abbreviation}, \\textit{Language}, \\textit{Special Characters}, and \\textit{Word Substitution}. This complements the previous results: learning-based and rule-based methods are effective when clean and redundant evidence is available, whereas the LLM-based method is more robust for transformations that require lexical, linguistic, or world knowledge.\n\n\\subsection{Efficiency and Scalability Experiments}\n\nTo evaluate efficiency and scalability of the different data cleaning systems, we measure runtime and peak memory usage. Table~\\ref{tab:runtime_memory} shows the corresponding results. We executed all systems three times. The number of records ranges from 10\\emph{k} to the full dataset size. Executions exceeding a predefined 10-hour limit were terminated.\n\n\\subsubsection{Runtime}\nAmong all baselines, DataWig is the fastest. Its runtime can be due to the small training set, consisting of only 20 tuples.\nBoth Raha and Baran were terminated before reaching 500\\emph{k} records: the former ran out of memory, while the latter exceeded the time limit.\nAlthough Horizon is usually fast, its runtime is sensitive to the number and interaction structure of the input FDs. Having to deal with 24 FDs at a 49\\% error rate, the run did not finish within 10 hours on the 500\\emph{k}-record dataset.\n\nUniClean's runtime is non-monotonic. The execution on 100\\emph{k} records (3,118s) is faster than on 10\\emph{k} (13,455s) and 500\\emph{k} (7,613s). UniClean is configured with a set of rules and repairs violations by first partitioning inconsistent rows into blocks. Cost scales with block size, rule count, and iteration count, so runtime is driven by error distribution rather than the number of rows.\nEach sample presents a different error profile, determining the non-monotonic behavior mentioned above.\nFinally, Glock's offloads computation to an external LLM API, avoiding local hardware limits, but one API call per record makes runtime and cost scale linearly, already requiring 8 hours to process 1M records and therefore exceeding the time limit on the full dataset with 4.3M records.\nClearly, also monetary costs become significant on large datasets.\nFor instance, just a single run on the full dataset would cost approximately \\$650.\nNote that Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a rather fast model with a quick-response API. We had significantly slower runtime in preliminary experiments using GPT-5-mini.\n\n\\begin{table}[ht]\n\\scriptsize\n\\centering\n\\caption{Runtime (seconds) and peak memory usage (MB) of data cleaning systems across samples of increasing size.\\\\TO: timeout (runtime $>$ 10 hours); OOM: out of memory.}\n\\vspace{-.3cm}\n\\label{tab:runtime_memory}\n\\begin{tabular}{ll rrrrr}\n\\toprule\n& & \\multicolumn{5}{c}{\\textbf{Number of Records}} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){3-7}\n\\textbf{Task} & \\textbf{System} & \\textbf{10$k$} & \\textbf{100$k$} & \\textbf{500$k$} & \\textbf{1M} & \\textbf{4.3M} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{7}{l}{\\textit{Runtime (seconds)}} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{3}{*}{Error Detection}\n & Raha & 122.7 & 12865.9 & OOM & OOM & OOM \\\\\n & HoloClean & 8.5 & 45.6 & 219.8 & 445.9 & 1,965.0 \\\\\n & Glock's & 101.8 & 1092.9 & 10,379.46 & 12,927.58 & TO \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{3}{*}{Error Correction}\n & Baran & 1,057.2 & 5,230.4 & TO & TO & TO \\\\\n\n & HoloClean & 404.5 & 4,621.1 & TO & TO & TO \\\\\n & Glock's & 103.4 & 1,747.39 & 8,945.61 & 16,567.23 & TO \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{3}{*}{\\shortstack[l]{Error Detection +\\\\Error Correction}}\n & DataWig & 29.1 & 241.2 & 1,186.4 & 2,376.5 & 10,230.1 \\\\\n & Horizon & 6,445.0 & TO & TO & TO & TO \\\\\n & UniClean &\n13,455 & 3,118 & 7,613 & 11,357 & 13,490 \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\midrule\n\n\\multicolumn{7}{l}{\\textit{Peak Memory (MB)}} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{3}{*}{Error Detection}\n & Raha & 1795 & 86,734 & OOM & OOM & OOM \\\\\n & HoloClean & 306 & 711 & 2,459 & 4,663 & 18,979 \\\\\n & Glock's & 257.69 & 1,030.13 & 4,562.0 & 8,954.88 & TO \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{3}{*}{Error Correction}\n & Baran & 685.84 & 3021.3 & TO & TO & TO \\\\\n & HoloClean & 2,867 & 33,843 & TO & TO & TO \\\\\n & Glock's & 257.69 & 1,030.13 & 4,562.0 & 8,954.88 & TO \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multirow{3}{*}{\\shortstack[l]{Error Detection +\\\\Error Correction}}\n& DataWig & 1,138 & 2,002 & 3,723 & 5,761 & 14,576 \\\\\n & Horizon & 1,700 & 2,088 & TO & TO & TO \\\\\n & UniClean & 8,229 & \t127,662 & 131,006 & 324,948 &\n315,567 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\subsubsection{Memory Usage}\n\nAmong the non-LLM approaches, DataWig is the most memory-efficient: it requires at most around 14~GB even on the full dataset. In contrast, Raha is substantially more memory-intensive. Its memory consumption increases from about 1.8~GB on the smallest setting to more than 86~GB on the subset with 100$k$ records, after which it runs out of memory. This limits its applicability to larger datasets despite its strong detection effectiveness. HoloClean also shows increasing memory usage, reaching around 19~GB for error detection on the full dataset. However, in correction settings it times out before memory becomes the limiting factor.\nUniClean shows the highest memory footprint. Its peak memory already exceeds 127~GB on 100$k$ records and more than 300~GB on larger samples. Horizon, in comparison, remains relatively lightweight on the smaller samples, but it times out on larger ones.\nFinally, the LLM-based approach has low memory requirements because the main computation is delegated to the cloud model. Thus, the reported peak memory usage does not reflect the actual memory footprint of the model.\n\n\\subsection{Key Takeaways}\nOverall, our experiments show that even for address data, which is highly prevalent and does not require specialized domain expertise, existing cleaning systems remain insufficient for resolving data quality issues, prompting the need for further research on scalable and reliable data cleaning.\nLearning-based methods are strong detectors and can exploit regularities within the dataset when sufficient clean evidence is available. LLM-based approaches are more robust under heterogeneity and missingness, but come with scalability costs. Rule-based systems are effective only in settings with high redundancy, reliable dependencies, and broad rule coverage.\nIn the following, we point out some more detailed takeaways.\n\n\\paragraph{(1) Data consistency.} Systems generally perform better on the country-specific slices than on the full dataset, confirming that linguistic, structural, and formatting consistency facilitates both detection and correction. Thus, a clear development direction for general-purpose cleaning systems is the ability to identify such slices automatically for effective step-wise cleaning.\n\n\\paragraph{(2) Error rates.} Detection often improves as the error rate increases, because erroneous cells become less rare and class imbalance becomes less severe. Correction, however, typically becomes harder at higher error rates, since the clean and redundant evidence needed to infer the correct value becomes less reliable. Future research should therefore consider including augmentation strategies to balance out the error rates.\n\n\\paragraph{(3) Cleaning strategies} We observe a clear tendency where supervised approaches outperform the more rigid rule-based systems, even on the rather canonical data types that exist in postal datasets. Although rule-based approaches are generally faster, their effectiveness depends on the error rate, dataset homogeneity, and availability of rules. While both rule-based and learning-based approaches primarily exploit patterns and evidence contained in the available data, LLMs can draw on knowledge acquired during pretraining to detect and correct erroneous values. This would suggest that a promising direction is a staged combination of these strategies, by filtering with fast and coarse-granular rule-based techniques and passing on difficult cases to the more powerful supervised and LLM-based solutions.\nHowever, we have to acknowledge that existing systems already combine rules, supervision, and agents~\\cite{DBLP:journals/pvldb/MahdaviA20,DBLP:conf/icde/NiZMZWWY25,DBLP:conf/icde/WuYZMNXZY25}. Thus, the way forward is to further refine and adjust how different approaches work together so that a quick fall-back on expensive agentic-based solutions can be avoided.\n\n\\paragraph{(4) Scalability} Existing systems scale differently and are therefore not equally suitable for all settings. Beyond table size, efficiency is affected by the error rate, the number and complexity of rules, and the distribution of errors and values in the data. LLM-based solutions avoid some local hardware limitations, but introduce a different scalability bottleneck: their cost and runtime depend on record-level inference, model response time, and the available serving infrastructure. Consequently, they can quickly become impractical at larger scales. Future cleaning research would benefit from approaches that take the relevant metadata into consideration and recalibrate their detection and correction strategies.\n\n\\subsubsection*{Limitations} While the dataset covers a very important domain and is large, it does not scale in the number of columns. Although current systems already struggle with the current dataset dimensions, it would be beneficial for future benchmarks to also scale horizontally.\nFurther, the dataset is skewed towards US and Europe.\nFinally, the approach for obtaining ground truth is only one among many. Quality describes fitness for use. How addresses should be represented and used can differ depending on the use case. Our approach made sure that the data is correct and consistent with regard to one standard that was cross-confirmed with different validators.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/experiments_ed_effectiveness.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{figure*}[t!]\n \\centering\n \\begin{tikzpicture}\n \\begin{groupplot}[\n group style={\n group size=6 by 1,\n horizontal sep=1cm,\n },\n width=0.2\\textwidth,\n height=0.2\\textwidth,\n xlabel={Error Rate},\n ylabel={F1-Score},\n xmode=log,\n xmin=0, xmax=0.55,\n ymin=0, ymax=1,\n xtick={0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.52},\n tick label style={font=\\normalsize, align=center, yshift=-0.5ex},\n xticklabels={$5\\%$, $ $, $20\\%$, $51\\%$},\n grid=both,\n ]\n\n \\nextgroupplot[\n title={\\deslice{} - Detection},\n legend to name=sharedlegend,\n legend columns=-1,\n legend style={draw=none, fill=none},\n xmin=0, xmax=0.55,\n ymin=0, ymax=1,\n xtick={0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.48},\n tick label style={font=\\normalsize, align=center, yshift=-0.5ex},\n xticklabels={$5\\%$, $ $, $20\\%$, $48\\%$},\n ]\n \\addplot[\n color=blue,\n mark=o,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/de_slice/raha.csv};\\addlegendentry{Raha}\n \\addplot[\n color=Emerald,\n mark=diamond,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/de_slice/datawig.csv};\\addlegendentry{DataWig}\n \\addplot[\n color=purple,\n mark=star,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/de_slice/glocks.csv};\\addlegendentry{Glock's}\n \\addplot[\n color=Brown,\n mark=oplus,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/de_slice/holoclean.csv};\\addlegendentry{HoloClean}\n \\addplot[\n color=Plum,\n mark=square*,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/de_slice/horizon.csv};\\addlegendentry{Horizon}\n\n \\addplot[\n color=WildStrawberry,\n mark=pentagon,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/de_slice/uniclean.csv};\n \\addlegendentry{UniClean}\n\n \\addlegendimage{color=BurntOrange, mark=*}\\addlegendentry{Baran}\n\n \\nextgroupplot[\n title={\\ruslice{} - Detection},\n ylabel={},\n xmin=0, xmax = 0.72,\n xtick={0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.65},\n xticklabels={$5\\%$, $ $, $20\\%$, $65\\%$},\n ]\n \\addplot[\n color=blue,\n mark=o,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/russia/raha.csv};\n \\addplot[\n color=Emerald,\n mark=diamond,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/russia/datawig.csv};\n \\addplot[\n color=purple,\n mark=star,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/russia/glocks.csv};\n \\addplot[\n color=Brown,\n mark=oplus,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/russia/holoclean.csv};\n \\addplot[\n color=Plum,\n mark=square*,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/russia/horizon.csv};\n\n \\addplot[\n color=WildStrawberry,\n mark=pentagon,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/russia/uniclean.csv};\n\n \\nextgroupplot[\n title={\\textsf{full} - Detection},\n ylabel={}\n ]\n \\addplot[\n color=blue,\n mark=o,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/full/raha.csv};\n \\addplot[\n color=Emerald,\n mark=diamond,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/full/datawig.csv};\n \\addplot[\n color=purple,\n mark=star,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/full/glocks.csv};\n \\addplot[\n color=Brown,\n mark=oplus,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/full/holoclean.csv};\n \\addplot[\n color=Plum,\n mark=square*,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]{experiments_results/effectiveness/full/horizon.csv};\n\n \\addplot[\n color=WildStrawberry,\n mark=pentagon,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=det_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/full/uniclean.csv};\n\n \\nextgroupplot[\n title={\\deslice{} - Correction},\n ylabel={},\n xmin=0, xmax=0.55,\n ymin=0, ymax=1,\n xtick={0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.48},\n tick label style={font=\\normalsize, align=center, yshift=-0.5ex},\n xticklabels={$5\\%$, $ $, $20\\%$, $48\\%$},\n ]\n\n \\addplot[\n color=Emerald,\n mark=diamond,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/de_slice/datawig.csv};\n\n \\addplot[\n color=purple,\n mark=star,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/de_slice/glocks.csv};\n\n \\addplot[\n color=Brown,\n mark=oplus,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/de_slice/holoclean.csv};\n\n \\addplot[\n color=Plum,\n mark=square*,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/de_slice/horizon.csv};\n\n \\addplot[\n color=BurntOrange,\n mark=*,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/de_slice/baran.csv};\n\n \\addplot[\n color=WildStrawberry,\n mark=pentagon,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/de_slice/uniclean.csv};\n\n \\nextgroupplot[\n title={\\ruslice{} - Correction},\n ylabel={},\n xmin=0, xmax = 0.72,\n xtick={0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.65},\n xticklabels={$5\\%$, $ $, $20\\%$, $65\\%$},\n ]\n\n \\addplot[\n color=Emerald,\n mark=diamond,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/russia/datawig.csv};\n\n \\addplot[\n color=purple,\n mark=star,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/russia/glocks.csv};\n\n \\addplot[\n color=Brown,\n mark=oplus,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/russia/holoclean.csv};\n\n \\addplot[\n color=Plum,\n mark=square*,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/russia/horizon.csv};\n\n \\addplot[\n color=BurntOrange,\n mark=*,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/russia/baran.csv};\n\n \\addplot[\n color=WildStrawberry,\n mark=pentagon,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/russia/uniclean.csv};\n\n \\nextgroupplot[\n title={\\textsf{full} - Correction},\n ylabel={}\n ]\n\n \\addplot[\n color=Emerald,\n mark=diamond,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/full/datawig.csv};\n \\addplot[\n color=Brown,\n mark=oplus,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/full/holoclean.csv};\n \\addplot[\n color=purple,\n mark=star,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/full/glocks.csv};\n \\addplot[\n color=Plum,\n mark=square*,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/full/horizon.csv};\n\n\\addplot[\n color=WildStrawberry,\n mark=pentagon,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/full/uniclean.csv};\n\n\\addplot[\n color=BurntOrange,\n mark=*,\n ] table[x=error_rate, y=corr_f1, col sep=comma]\n {experiments_results/effectiveness/full/baran.csv};\n\n \\end{groupplot}\n\n \\node at ($(group c3r1.south)!0.5!(group c4r1.south)+(0,-1.2cm)$)\n {\\ref{sharedlegend}};\n\n \\end{tikzpicture}\n\n\\vspace{-.5cm}\n\n \\caption{F1-score of different data cleaning systems for error detection and correction on subsets of \\deslice{}, \\ruslice{}, and \\dsname{} dataset variations at different error rates.}\n \\label{fig:effectiveness}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/introduction.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Introduction}\n\\label{sec:introduction}\n\nEnsuring high-quality data is a cumbersome process that requires numerous exhaustive human cycles~\\cite{DBLP:journals/sigmod/MohammedEHNS25}. Data cleaning research aims to automate this task, proposing a large number of rule-based~\\cite{DBLP:journals/pvldb/RezigOAEMS21}, learning-based~\\cite{DBLP:journals/pvldb/MahdaviA20}, and, more recently, LLM-driven~\\cite{DBLP:conf/icde/WuYZMNXZY25} approaches.\nAlthough individual papers often report improved results, industrial adoption remains a challenge. This is partially due to the fact that many approaches are not scalable, or they target specific error types and distributions that do not reflect the complexity of the real world~\\cite{DBLP:journals/jdiq/JungJCB25}.\n\nOne impeding factor to data cleaning research is the absence of real-world benchmark datasets to guide the research progress. For evaluating a cleaning algorithm, two versions of a dataset are necessary: the so-called \\emph{dirty} version, which requires cleaning, and the \\emph{ground truth}, which contains all records in the desired cleaned format.\nGenerally, there are three possible approaches to obtain such benchmark datasets: \\emph{(i)}~a supposedly clean dataset is dirtied using error generators~\\cite{DBLP:journals/pvldb/ArocenaGMMPS15, DBLP:journals/jdiq/JungJCB25}, \\emph{(ii)}~a dirty dataset is manually curated to obtain the corresponding ground truth~\\cite{AbedjanCDFIOPST16}, or \\emph{(iii)}~the ground truth does not exist and the success of a downstream task, such as inference accuracy, is used as a proxy for cleanliness~\\cite{DBLP:journals/is/MohammedBFINNPNH25,DBLP:journals/pacmmod/SiddiqiKB23,DBLP:conf/icde/LiRBZCZ21}.\n\nEach of these approaches is generally viable but has specific limitations. Error generators are useful for benchmarking algorithm behavior in controlled environments, but they often rely on randomness or explicit patterns, in contrast to latent patterns that manifest in the real world.\nTabular errors result from systematic flaws in data collection, such as human typos, flawed extractors, outdated values, etc.\nIn contrast, when building a benchmark from naturally dirty data, the central challenge is constructing ground truth at scale. This is either feasible for small-scale datasets or for very obvious errors that can be cleaned with very simple heuristics. Finally, using downstream task performance circumvents the need for obtaining ground truth.\nHowever, downstream proxy scores are not always guiding towards a clean version of a dataset, as proxy scores such as downstream inference accuracy might even improve through artificial noise~\\cite{DBLP:journals/is/MohammedBFINNPNH25}.\n\nTo address the lack of realistic large-scale benchmark datasets, we put our efforts into providing researchers and practitioners with a real-world dataset that can be used for benchmarking data cleaning solutions.\nCleaning postal information has been a primary use case in data quality assessment, as companies try to retain curated information about (prospective) customers~\\cite{digital4040051}, suppliers, and partners~\\cite{Leeuw1992DataQI}. The famous case of the 6.8 billion pieces of mail that could not be delivered as addressed~\\cite{usps}\nfurther underpins the importance of data quality in such a context.\nDespite this relevance, a real-world benchmark address dataset has so far been missing. Prior research was conducted on either proprietary address datasets or a rather limited restaurant dataset~\\cite{AbedjanCDFIOPST16}.\n\nIn this paper, we present a dataset that contains real addresses of organizations across the world with real-world data quality problems.\nTo obtain this dataset, we exploited the Web Data Commons (WDC) corpus~\\cite{DBLP:conf/www/BrinkmannPB23} and used Web services to collect postal information on public entities.\nThe resulting dataset contains up to 9,317,886 records, which exhibit data quality issues that stem from language inconsistencies, inaccuracies, obsolescence, and extraction limitations~\\cite{DBLP:journals/pvldb/AbedjanAOPS15}. We also provide further variations of the dataset that differ in terms of geographical scope, type of entities, and cleanliness.\n\nWe show that a rather low-dimensional real-world dataset is already challenging for state-of-the-art research prototypes, opening avenues for further research in error detection and correction. In summary, we make the following contributions.\n\n\\begin{enumerate}[leftmargin=*]\n \\item We present a real-world benchmark dataset for scalable data cleaning that contains real errors. We also provide the corresponding ground truth derived from geocoding services. We share our process for obtaining this benchmark dataset. The process is fully reproducible and our dataset and extraction code are available online.\n\n \\item We conduct an extensive evaluation that highlights the limitations of existing approaches for both error detection and correction. None of the evaluated data cleaning approaches can reliably clean the dataset or even its slices. Learning-based approaches generally achieve strong effectiveness, but they also expose clear scalability limitations.\n\n \\item We identify and discuss future directions for data cleaning research, supported by empirical evidence from our benchmark and evaluation. In particular, our results show the need for approaches that can benefit from corrections beyond the input dataset, balance classic rule-based, learning-based, and LLM-driven strategies, and scale not only with respect to the number of rows and columns, but also across different error rates and error distributions.\n\n\\end{enumerate}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/related_work.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Related Work}\n\nBenchmark datasets for data cleaning appear in three adjacent lines of research.\n\n\\subsubsection*{Data Cleaning Research}\nMost real-world benchmark datasets have been established on-the-fly while proposing novel data cleaning techniques.\nThis is the case for datasets like Hospital~\\cite{DBLP:conf/icde/ChuIP13}, Flights~\\cite{DBLP:journals/pvldb/LiDLMS12}, Rayyan~\\cite{ouzzani2016rayyan}, or Beers~\\cite{beers_dataset}.\nIn 2015, Abedjan et al.~\\cite{AbedjanCDFIOPST16} conducted an evaluation of state-of-the-art error detection techniques from that time.\nTo focus on real-world errors, the authors mostly relied on proprietary datasets.\nNi et al.\\ extended the evaluation to data repair~\\cite{DBLP:journals/pvldb/NiMZWLY24}.\nOverall, most of the existing datasets are either small or contain errors that are easy to identify and fix. For example, Flights contains duplicate records acquired from different sources and\npresents a strong correlation between the source of a record and its quality. Thus, errors can be easily detected and corrected using records from higher-quality sources.\n\n\\subsubsection*{Error Generators}\nSeveral benchmarking papers provided error generation tools for datasets.\nBART~\\cite{DBLP:journals/pvldb/ArocenaGMMPS15} represents one of the earliest efforts to systematically generate data errors for benchmarking data cleaning systems, enabling controlled injection of diverse error types into clean databases. It remains widely used for constructing synthetic benchmarks~\\cite{DBLP:conf/edbt/0003HS23}. JENGA~\\cite{DBLP:conf/edbt/SchelterRB21} is a framework that includes a data corruption module to study the impact of data quality issues on downstream machine learning tasks.\nGouDa~\\cite{DBLP:conf/deem/RestatBCS22} is a data generation tool that creates datasets with specific error types without requiring an initial clean table.\nMore recently, Jung et al.~\\cite{DBLP:journals/jdiq/JungJCB25} argued that errors in real-world data often depend on the data itself, whereas many existing benchmarks inject errors independently of the underlying data. They proposed a latent-factor model that captures dependencies between data values and error occurrences through shared latent variables.\nWhile these frameworks facilitate controlled evaluations, they still produce synthetic errors with a set of predefined types rather than naturally occurring ones, limiting their ability to reflect the full diversity of real-world data issues.\n\n\\subsubsection*{Data Cleaning for Machine Learning}\nData cleaning can be an operator within a data science pipeline~\\cite{DBLP:conf/edbt/SchelterRB21}. Thus, one can measure the effectiveness of cleaning using downstream model performance as a proxy.\nKarlaš et al.\\ proposed CPClean~\\cite{DBLP:journals/pvldb/KarlasLWGC0020}, a data cleaning framework built on top of machine learning pipelines, and evaluated the impact of cleaning in the context of \\textit{k}-nearest neighbor classifiers.\nAbdelaal et al.\\ proposed REIN~\\cite{DBLP:conf/edbt/0003HS23}, a benchmark framework that enables data cleaning evaluation for downstream machine learning tasks, such as regression, classification, and clustering. While using downstream accuracy is viable in some scenarios, it does not serve for general-purpose data cleaning assessment.\nIndeed, it can be misleading, as the downstream performance optimum often differs from the performance on the actual ground truth data~\\cite{DBLP:journals/is/MohammedBFINNPNH25}.\n\n\\emph{With our benchmark dataset}, we expand existing test cases in two directions: we provide a \\emph{very large real-world dataset with ground truth} and we curate smaller subsets for specific analysis tasks. Our dataset is significantly larger than existing academic datasets, showcasing the limitations of current cleaning methods.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: sections/requirements.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Address Dataset}\n\nIn this section, we iterate through the requirements we expect a benchmark dataset for data cleaning to meet and introduce the design of the targeted schema.\n\n\\subsection{Dataset Requirements}\n\\label{sec:dataset:requirements}\nThe main goal of this benchmark dataset is to support data cleaning research. We therefore identify several requirements that the final benchmark should fulfill.\n\n \\textit{(1) Relevant domain.}\n The dataset should belong to a common domain for data cleaning and the errors should closely mirror those present in real-world data.\n\n \\textit{(2) Content variations.}\n The dataset should capture a diverse set of data relationships at row and column levels.\n Thus, it should exhibit redundancy and conflicting records, different data types, as well as both related and independent attributes.\n\n \\textit{(3) Error diversity.}\n The data should encompass various error types, such as missing values, inconsistent formatting, contradictory data, misspellings, or nonsensical values.\n Some errors should be easy to fix without additional context, while others might require consideration of attribute relationships and external knowledge.\n\n \\textit{(4) Ground truth labels.}\n We are interested in how well a system can detect and correct errors.\n With the ground truth data for each record it is possible to determine which values are erroneous and what the correct value should be, enabling the calculation of metrics such as precision and recall.\n\n \\textit{(5) Provenance.}\n The dataset should track the origin of each record. This enables transparent inspection of benchmark construction and allows future users to verify, reproduce, or extend the dataset.\n\n\\subsection{Domain: Postal Addresses}\n\\label{sec:requirement:design}\n\nFor our benchmark dataset, we choose the domain of postal information.\nPostal address data is prevalent in a wide range of real-world applications, such as e-commerce or logistics.\nIt is one of the most common types of data that is subject to cleaning~\\cite{AbedjanCDFIOPST16}.\nWhile prevalent, address information is often challenging, as formats do not follow a single, universally adopted standard.\n\nAs a result, the address structure can vary considerably depending on local postal conventions and cultural differences.\nFor instance, the house number typically precedes the street name in US addresses (e.g., \\textit{17 Main Street}) and follows it in German addresses (e.g., \\textit{Hauptstraße 17}).\nAddresses commonly include abbreviations, and even punctuation is often used inconsistently, separating address components through commas, whitespaces, or dashes.\nFurther, address styles can be heavily location-specific.\nFor example, the old town of Mannheim in Germany employs a distinctive addressing scheme using block-level identifiers and house numbers, while other districts of Mannheim adhere to the conventional German format based on street name and house number.\nFinally, postal data often exhibit missing values: while fields such as street or locality are integral to an address, other fields such as region or country are frequently missing.\n\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091184,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31984"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31984"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Yufei Li"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Yufei Li, Zaiwei Zhang, Mingfu Liang, Kavosh Asadi, Jay Xu, Jimmy Kim, Chongyang Bai, Jieyi Zhang, Hongye Xie, Prachi Agrawal, Dian Yu, Tianyi Chen, Jean-Pascal Billaud, Garret Buell, YK (Yongkang) Zhu, Sachin Patil, Brooke Bian, Zhou Fang, Kevin Huang, Shiva Sudanagunta, Yuzhen Huang, Emma Lu, Chris O'Brien, Yang Song, Lihong Li, Jacob Tao, Zhicheng Zhu, Chao Li, Gaoxiang Liu, Neil Wu, Li Han, Loki Chen, Ming Lei, Greg Rehm, Siyuan Song, Tianwei Zhang, Li Li, Ketan Singh, Yavuz Yetim, Ilyas Atishev, Satendra Gera, Ashkan Sadeghi, Rachel Yan, Nikko Mizutani, Shuaiwen Wang, Song Yang, Zhijing Li, Jiang Liu, Mengying Sun, Fei Tian, Xiaohan Wei, Chonglin Sun, Shuo Gu, Parish Aggarwal, Kaushik Rangadurai, Zhi Hua, Frank Shyu, Ruchit Sharma, Liyuan Li, Shike Mei, Wenlin Chen, Santanu Kolay, Ben Schulte, Deepak Chandra, Adam (Yang) Song, Sandeep Pandey, Xi Liu, Hamed Firooz, Luke Simon"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"GR2 Technical Report"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"18 pages, 10 figures"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.IR cs.AI"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Industrial recommendation systems serve billions of users through a multi-stage funnel -- retrieval, early-stage ranking, and re-ranking -- where the final re-ranking step disproportionately shapes user engagement and downstream performance, particularly for carousel and grid display formats. Despite growing enthusiasm for Large Language Models (LLMs) in recommendation, three gaps hinder industrial adoption: (1) most efforts target retrieval and ranking, leaving re-ranking -- the stage closest to the final user experience -- largely underexplored; (2) LLMs are typically deployed zero-shot or via supervised fine-tuning, underutilizing the reasoning capabilities unlocked by reinforcement learning (RL) on verifiable rewards; (3) deployed catalogs index billions of items with non-semantic identifiers that lie outside any base-LLM vocabulary. We present GR2 (Generative Reasoning Re-Ranker), an end-to-end framework that combines (i) mid-training on semantic IDs produced by a tokenizer with >=99% uniqueness, (ii) reasoning-trace distilled from a stronger teacher via targeted prompting and rejection sampling, and (iii) RL with verifiable rewards purpose-built for re-ranking. To make GR2 resource-viable, we further (iv) introduce a context compressor that amortizes training cost, On-Policy Distillation (OPD) as a scalable alternative to SFT -- which we find collapses at industrial scale -- and reasoning distillation for low-latency serving. GR2 delivers +18.7% R@1, +7.1% R@3, and +9.6% N@3 over legacy baselines on industrial-scale traffic. We further find that reward design is critical in re-ranking: LLMs often hack rewards by preserving the incoming order or exploiting position bias, motivating conditional verifiable rewards as essential industrial components."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:22:22 GMT"},{"version":"v2","created":"Wed, 01 Jul 2026 23:39:37 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:22:22 GMT\"\n },\n {\n \"version\": \"v2\",\n \"created\": \"Wed, 01 Jul 2026 23:39:37 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-03"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Li","Yufei","","Yongkang"],["Zhang","Zaiwei","","Yongkang"],["Liang","Mingfu","","Yongkang"],["Asadi","Kavosh","","Yongkang"],["Xu","Jay","","Yongkang"],["Kim","Jimmy","","Yongkang"],["Bai","Chongyang","","Yongkang"],["Zhang","Jieyi","","Yongkang"],["Xie","Hongye","","Yongkang"],["Agrawal","Prachi","","Yongkang"],["Yu","Dian","","Yongkang"],["Chen","Tianyi","","Yongkang"],["Billaud","Jean-Pascal","","Yongkang"],["Buell","Garret","","Yongkang"],["YK","","","Yongkang"],["Zhu","","","Yang"],["Patil","Sachin","","Yang"],["Bian","Brooke","","Yang"],["Fang","Zhou","","Yang"],["Huang","Kevin","","Yang"],["Sudanagunta","Shiva","","Yang"],["Huang","Yuzhen","","Yang"],["Lu","Emma","","Yang"],["O'Brien","Chris","","Yang"],["Song","Yang","","Yang"],["Li","Lihong","","Yang"],["Tao","Jacob","","Yang"],["Zhu","Zhicheng","","Yang"],["Li","Chao","","Yang"],["Liu","Gaoxiang","","Yang"],["Wu","Neil","","Yang"],["Han","Li","","Yang"],["Chen","Loki","","Yang"],["Lei","Ming","","Yang"],["Rehm","Greg","","Yang"],["Song","Siyuan","","Yang"],["Zhang","Tianwei","","Yang"],["Li","Li","","Yang"],["Singh","Ketan","","Yang"],["Yetim","Yavuz","","Yang"],["Atishev","Ilyas","","Yang"],["Gera","Satendra","","Yang"],["Sadeghi","Ashkan","","Yang"],["Yan","Rachel","","Yang"],["Mizutani","Nikko","","Yang"],["Wang","Shuaiwen","","Yang"],["Yang","Song","","Yang"],["Li","Zhijing","","Yang"],["Liu","Jiang","","Yang"],["Sun","Mengying","","Yang"],["Tian","Fei","","Yang"],["Wei","Xiaohan","","Yang"],["Sun","Chonglin","","Yang"],["Gu","Shuo","","Yang"],["Aggarwal","Parish","","Yang"],["Rangadurai","Kaushik","","Yang"],["Hua","Zhi","","Yang"],["Shyu","Frank","","Yang"],["Sharma","Ruchit","","Yang"],["Li","Liyuan","","Yang"],["Mei","Shike","","Yang"],["Chen","Wenlin","","Yang"],["Kolay","Santanu","","Yang"],["Schulte","Ben","","Yang"],["Chandra","Deepak","","Yang"],["Adam","","","Yang"],["Song","",""],["Pandey","Sandeep",""],["Liu","Xi",""],["Firooz","Hamed",""],["Simon","Luke",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Li\",\n \"Yufei\",\n \"\",\n \"Yongkang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Zhang\",\n \"Zaiwei\",\n \"\",\n \"Yongkang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Liang\",\n \"Mingfu\",\n \"\",\n \"Yongkang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Asadi\",\n \"Kavosh\",\n \"\",\n \"Yongkang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Xu\",\n \"Jay\",\n \"\",\n \"Yongkang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Kim\",\n \"Jimmy\",\n \"\",\n \"Yongkang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Bai\",\n \"Chongyang\",\n \"\",\n \"Yongkang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Zhang\",\n \"Jieyi\",\n \"\",\n \"Yongkang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Xie\",\n \"Hongye\",\n \"\",\n \"Yongkang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Agrawal\",\n \"Prachi\",\n \"\",\n \"Yongkang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Yu\",\n \"Dian\",\n \"\",\n \"Yongkang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Chen\",\n \"Tianyi\",\n \"\",\n \"Yongkang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Billaud\",\n \"Jean-Pascal\",\n \"\",\n \"Yongkang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Buell\",\n \"Garret\",\n \"\",\n \"Yongkang\"\n ],\n [\n \"YK\",\n \"\",\n \"\",\n \"Yongkang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Zhu\",\n \"\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Patil\",\n \"Sachin\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Bian\",\n \"Brooke\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Fang\",\n \"Zhou\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Huang\",\n \"Kevin\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Sudanagunta\",\n \"Shiva\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Huang\",\n \"Yuzhen\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Lu\",\n \"Emma\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"O'Brien\",\n \"Chris\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Song\",\n \"Yang\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Li\",\n \"Lihong\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Tao\",\n \"Jacob\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Zhu\",\n \"Zhicheng\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Li\",\n \"Chao\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Liu\",\n \"Gaoxiang\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Wu\",\n \"Neil\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Han\",\n \"Li\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Chen\",\n \"Loki\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Lei\",\n \"Ming\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Rehm\",\n \"Greg\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Song\",\n \"Siyuan\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Zhang\",\n \"Tianwei\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Li\",\n \"Li\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Singh\",\n \"Ketan\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Yetim\",\n \"Yavuz\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Atishev\",\n \"Ilyas\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Gera\",\n \"Satendra\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Sadeghi\",\n \"Ashkan\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Yan\",\n \"Rachel\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Mizutani\",\n \"Nikko\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Wang\",\n \"Shuaiwen\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Yang\",\n \"Song\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Li\",\n \"Zhijing\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Liu\",\n \"Jiang\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Sun\",\n \"Mengying\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Tian\",\n \"Fei\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Wei\",\n \"Xiaohan\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Sun\",\n \"Chonglin\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Gu\",\n \"Shuo\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Aggarwal\",\n \"Parish\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Rangadurai\",\n \"Kaushik\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Hua\",\n \"Zhi\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Shyu\",\n \"Frank\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Sharma\",\n \"Ruchit\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Li\",\n \"Liyuan\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Mei\",\n \"Shike\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Chen\",\n \"Wenlin\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Kolay\",\n \"Santanu\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Schulte\",\n \"Ben\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Chandra\",\n \"Deepak\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Adam\",\n \"\",\n \"\",\n \"Yang\"\n ],\n [\n \"Song\",\n \"\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Pandey\",\n \"Sandeep\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Liu\",\n \"Xi\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Firooz\",\n \"Hamed\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Simon\",\n \"Luke\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: fairmeta.cls\n================================================\n% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% A new style for FAIR pre-prints\n% Author: dlp@meta.com\n% Version: 1.1\n% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n% Class declarations %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesClass{fairmeta}\n\\LoadClassWithOptions{article}\n\n% Layout %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\RequirePackage[top=2.25cm, bottom=2.5cm, left=2.5cm, right=2.5cm, columnsep=0.65cm]{geometry}\n% Page header with GR2 logo %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\RequirePackage{fancyhdr}\n\\RequirePackage{eso-pic} % alternative: stamp on every page incl. title\n\n% Make room at the top for the logo\n\\geometry{top=3.0cm,headheight=1.2cm,headsep=0.4cm}\n\n\\pagestyle{fancy}\n\\fancyhf{} % clear default header/footer\n\\renewcommand{\\headrulewidth}{0pt}\n\\fancyhead[L]{\\includegraphics[height=0.9cm]{assets/gr2_logo.png}}\n\n% Also stamp it on the title page (which uses \\thispagestyle{plain})\n\\fancypagestyle{plain}{%\n\\fancyhf{}%\n\\renewcommand{\\headrulewidth}{0pt}%\n\\fancyhead[L]{\\includegraphics[height=0.9cm]{assets/gr2_logo.png}}%\n}\n\n\\RequirePackage{microtype}\n\\RequirePackage{placeins}\n\\RequirePackage{hyphenat}\n\\RequirePackage{setspace}\n\\RequirePackage{parskip}\n\\RequirePackage[latin, english]{babel}\n\\RequirePackage{lipsum}\n\\RequirePackage{etoolbox}\n\n\\DisableLigatures[f]{family=sf*} \n\n% Graphics %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\RequirePackage{graphicx}\n\\RequirePackage{subcaption}\n\n% Tables %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\RequirePackage{booktabs}\n\\RequirePackage{nicematrix}\n\\RequirePackage{multirow}\n\\RequirePackage{bm}\n\\newcommand{\\nm}[1]{#1}\n\n% Colorful stuff %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\RequirePackage[most]{tcolorbox}\n\\RequirePackage{xcolor}\n\\definecolor{metablue}{HTML}{0064E0}\n\\definecolor{metafg}{HTML}{1C2B33}\n\\definecolor{metabg}{HTML}{F1F4F7}\n\n% References %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\RequirePackage{hyperref}\n\\RequirePackage[noabbrev,nameinlink]{cleveref}\n\\hypersetup{\n colorlinks,\n linkcolor=metablue,\n citecolor=metablue,\n urlcolor=metablue\n}\n\n\\RequirePackage[round,authoryear]{natbib}\n\\def\\bibfont{\\small}\n\n% Section and caption format %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\RequirePackage{titlesec}\n\\titleformat*{\\paragraph}{\\itshape}\n\\titleformat*{\\section}{\\Large\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\titleformat*{\\subsection}{\\large\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\titleformat*{\\subsubsection}{\\normalsize\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\DeclareTextFontCommand{\\textbf}{\\bfseries\\sffamily}\n\n\\RequirePackage{caption}\n\\DeclareCaptionLabelSeparator{custom}{}\n\\DeclareCaptionFormat{custom}{{\\sffamily\\textbf{#1 #2}} #3}\n\\captionsetup{singlelinecheck=false,format=custom,labelsep=custom,font=small}\n\\captionsetup[sub]{singlelinecheck=true,format=custom,labelsep=custom,font=small}\n\n% Meta custom fonts %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% http://c.caignaert.free.fr/Install-ttf-Font.pdf\n\n\\renewcommand*\\ttdefault{cmvtt}\n\\RequirePackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\n% \\pdfmapline{+optimistic < assets/Optimistic.ttf <T1-WGL4.enc}\n% \\renewcommand{\\sfdefault}{optimistic}\n\n\\DeclareFontFamily{T1}{optimistic}{}\n\\DeclareFontShape{T1}{optimistic}{m}{n}{<-> s * [0.88] assets/optimistic}{}\n\\pdfmapline{+optimistic < assets/Optimistic.ttf <T1-WGL4.enc}\n\\renewcommand{\\sfdefault}{optimistic}\n\n% Authors, affiliations, infos %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\renewcommand\\addtolist[5][]{\n \\begingroup\n \\if\\relax#3\\relax\\def\\sep{}\\else\\def\\sep{#5}\\fi\n \\let\\protect\\@unexpandable@protect \n \\xdef#3{\\expandafter{#3}\\sep #4[#1]{#2}}%\n \\endgroup\n}\n\n\\newcommand\\authorlist{}\n\\newcommand\\authorformat[2][]{{\\sffamily \\bfseries #2$^{#1}$}}\n\\renewcommand\\author[2][]{\\addtolist[#1]{#2}{\\authorlist}{\\authorformat}{, }}\n\n\\newcommand\\affiliationlist{}\n\\newcommand\\affiliationformat[2][]{{\\normalsize $^{#1}$#2}}\n\\newcommand\\affiliation[2][]{\\addtolist[#1]{#2}{\\affiliationlist}{\\affiliationformat}{, }}\n\n\\newcommand\\contributionlist{}\n\\newcommand\\contributionformat[2][]{{\\small $^{#1}$#2}}\n\\newcommand\\contribution[2][]{\\addtolist[#1]{#2}{\\contributionlist}{\\contributionformat}{, }}\n\n\\newcommand\\metadatalist{}\n\\newcommand\\metadataformat[2][]{{\\small {\\sffamily \\bfseries #1:} #2}}\n\\newcommand\\metadata[2][]{\\addtolist[#1]{#2}{\\metadatalist}{\\metadataformat}{\\par}}\n\n\\renewcommand{\\abstract}[1]{\\def\\abstractlist{{\\color{metafg} #1}}}\n\\newcommand{\\email}[1]{\\href{mailto:#1}{\\texttt{#1}}}\n\n\\renewcommand\\date[1]{\\metadata[Date]{#1}}\n\\newcommand\\correspondence[1]{\\metadata[Correspondence]{#1}}\n\n\\renewcommand{\\title}[1]{\\newcommand{\\titlelist}{{\\huge\\sffamily\\bfseries #1}}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\beginappendix}{\\appendix{\\huge\\sffamily Appendix\\par}}\n\n% Titlebox %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\n\\newcommand{\\mymaketitle}{%\n \\tcbset{enhanced,frame hidden}\n \\tcbset{left=0.5cm}\n \\tcbset{right=0.5cm}\n \\tcbset{top=0.5cm}\n \\tcbset{bottom=0.5cm}\n \\tcbset{arc=10pt}\n \\tcbset{colback=metabg}\n \\tcbset{before skip=0pt}\n \\tcbset{grow to left by=1.5pt}\n \\tcbset{grow to right by=1.5pt}\n \\tcbset{overlay={\\node[\n anchor=south east,\n at= (frame.south east),\n xshift=-0.5cm,\n yshift=0.5cm] {\\includegraphics[width=1.5cm]{assets/logometa.pdf}};}}\n % \n \\begin{tcolorbox}\n \\setlength{\\parindent}{0cm}\n \\setlength{\\parskip}{0.5cm}\n {\n \\setlength{\\parskip}{0cm}\n \\raggedright\n \\nohyphens\n %\n {\n \\setstretch{1.618}\n \\titlelist\\par\n }\n \\vskip 0.2cm\n %\n \\authorlist\\par\n \\vskip 0.2cm\n %\n \\affiliationlist\\par\n %\n \\contributionlist\\par\n }\n %\n \\abstractlist\\par\n %\n \\vskip 0.5cm\n %\n {\n \\setlength{\\parskip}{0cm}\n \\ifdefempty{\\metadatalist}{\\vspace*{0.65cm}}{\\metadatalist\\par}\n }\n \\end{tcolorbox}\n \\tcbset{reset}\n \\FloatBarrier\n}\n\n\\if@twocolumn%\n\\renewcommand{\\maketitle}{\n\\twocolumn[%\n \\mymaketitle\n \\vskip 0.38cm\n]\n}%\n\\else%\n\\renewcommand{\\maketitle}{\n \\mymaketitle\n}%\n\\fi\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: fairmeta_gr2.cls\n================================================\n% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% A new style for FAIR pre-prints -- GR2 customization\n% Based on fairmeta.cls v1.1 by dlp@meta.com\n% Adds: per-page logo header (top-left) with horizontal separator rule.\n%\n% Usage: \\documentclass[]{fairmeta_gr2}\n% Place logo files in assets/ and edit the \\headerlogos macro below.\n% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n% Class declarations %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesClass{fairmeta_gr2}\n\\LoadClassWithOptions{article}\n\n% Layout %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% top= bumped from 2.25cm to 3.0cm and headheight/headsep added to make room\n% for the logo header. Adjust top + headheight together if you change the\n% logo size; see the \"Page header\" section below.\n\n\\RequirePackage[top=3.0cm, bottom=2.5cm, left=2.5cm, right=2.5cm,\n columnsep=0.65cm, headheight=1.4cm, headsep=0.5cm]{geometry}\n\\RequirePackage{microtype}\n\\RequirePackage{placeins}\n\\RequirePackage{hyphenat}\n\\RequirePackage{setspace}\n\\RequirePackage{parskip}\n\\RequirePackage[latin, english]{babel}\n\\RequirePackage{lipsum}\n\\RequirePackage{etoolbox}\n\n\\DisableLigatures[f]{family=sf*}\n\n% Graphics %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\RequirePackage{graphicx}\n\\RequirePackage{subcaption}\n\n% Tables %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\RequirePackage{booktabs}\n\\RequirePackage{nicematrix}\n\\RequirePackage{multirow}\n\\RequirePackage{bm}\n\\newcommand{\\nm}[1]{#1}\n\n% Colorful stuff %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\RequirePackage[most]{tcolorbox}\n\\RequirePackage{xcolor}\n\\definecolor{metablue}{HTML}{0064E0}\n\\definecolor{metafg}{HTML}{1C2B33}\n\\definecolor{metabg}{HTML}{F1F4F7}\n\n% References %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\RequirePackage{hyperref}\n\\RequirePackage[noabbrev,nameinlink]{cleveref}\n\\hypersetup{\n colorlinks,\n linkcolor=metablue,\n citecolor=metablue,\n urlcolor=metablue\n}\n\n\\RequirePackage[round,authoryear]{natbib}\n\\def\\bibfont{\\small}\n\n% Section and caption format %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\RequirePackage{titlesec}\n\\titleformat*{\\paragraph}{\\itshape}\n\\titleformat*{\\section}{\\Large\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\titleformat*{\\subsection}{\\large\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\titleformat*{\\subsubsection}{\\normalsize\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\DeclareTextFontCommand{\\textbf}{\\bfseries\\sffamily}\n\n\\RequirePackage{caption}\n\\DeclareCaptionLabelSeparator{custom}{}\n\\DeclareCaptionFormat{custom}{{\\sffamily\\textbf{#1 #2}} #3}\n\\captionsetup{singlelinecheck=false,format=custom,labelsep=custom,font=small}\n\\captionsetup[sub]{singlelinecheck=true,format=custom,labelsep=custom,font=small}\n\n% Meta custom fonts %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% http://c.caignaert.free.fr/Install-ttf-Font.pdf\n\n\\renewcommand*\\ttdefault{cmvtt}\n\\RequirePackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\n\\DeclareFontFamily{T1}{optimistic}{}\n\\DeclareFontShape{T1}{optimistic}{m}{n}{<-> s * [0.88] assets/optimistic}{}\n\\pdfmapline{+optimistic < assets/Optimistic.ttf <T1-WGL4.enc}\n\\renewcommand{\\sfdefault}{optimistic}\n\n% First-page header with logos %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% The GR2 logo header is intentionally shown only on the first/title page.\n% All subsequent pages use an empty header with no separator rule.\n%\n% --- How to adjust the logo size --------------------------------------------\n% * Change \\headerlogoheight below. All logos in \\headerlogos scale together.\n% * If you push it past ~1.2cm, also raise top= and headheight= in \\geometry\n% (rule of thumb: top ~= logo height + 2cm, headheight ~= logo height + 0.5cm).\n% * For a one-off override on a single logo, replace [height=\\headerlogoheight]\n% with an explicit value, e.g. [height=1.1cm], on that \\includegraphics line.\n%\n% --- How to add more logos (e.g. collaborator universities) -----------------\n% 1. Drop the image into assets/ (prefer vector PDF/SVG; if PNG, >=300 DPI).\n% 2. Edit ONLY the \\headerlogos macro: append a \\hspace{\\headerlogosep}\n% followed by another \\includegraphics line. Order is left-to-right.\n% 3. To split logos across the first-page header (Meta left, university right)\n% instead of stacking them on the left, also use \\fancyhead[R]{...} inside\n% the `gr2firstpage` style below.\n%\n% --- How to remove the first-page separator rule -----------------------------\n% Set \\headrulewidth to 0pt inside the `gr2firstpage` style below.\n% ----------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\\RequirePackage{fancyhdr}\n\n% Tunable knobs\n\\newcommand{\\headerlogoheight}{0.9cm} % logo height (width auto-scales)\n\\newcommand{\\headerlogosep}{0.35cm} % horizontal gap between adjacent logos\n\\newcommand{\\headerruleskip}{0.15cm} % vertical gap between logos and the rule\n\n% Single source of truth for first-page header content. Add/remove logos here only.\n%\n% The `trim=L B R T, clip` parameters strip whitespace from the bitmap before\n% it is scaled, so the rule below sits flush against the visible artwork.\n% Units are bp (1bp = 1 pixel of the source PNG at 72dpi). Adjust per logo.\n%\n% GR2_logo_cropped.png is shipped pre-cropped (a separate one-time crop already\n% removed ~25%% top/bottom + ~18%% left/right padding). The trim values\n% below are therefore 0 -- change them only if you replace the file with\n% an un-cropped version. For the original GR2_logo.png the matching values\n% would be: trim=396 180 402 178.\n\\newcommand{\\headerlogos}{%\n \\includegraphics[height=\\headerlogoheight, trim=0 0 0 0, clip]{assets/GR2_logo_cropped.png}\n % To add a collaborator logo, uncomment and duplicate as needed.\n % If the new logo has padding, set its own trim=L B R T (bp) to crop it.\n % \\hspace{\\headerlogosep}%\n % \\includegraphics[height=\\headerlogoheight, trim=0 0 0 0, clip]{assets/university_logo.pdf}%\n}\n\n% Default style for pages after page 1: no logo and no header rule.\n\\pagestyle{fancy}\n\\fancyhf{}\n\\renewcommand{\\headrulewidth}{0pt}\n\n% Keep standard `plain` pages header-free as well (e.g., after \\clearpage).\n\\fancypagestyle{plain}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\renewcommand{\\headrulewidth}{0pt}%\n}\n\n% First/title page style: GR2 logo plus separator rule.\n\\fancypagestyle{gr2firstpage}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\renewcommand{\\headrulewidth}{0.4pt}%\n \\renewcommand{\\headrule}{%\n \\vskip\\headerruleskip\n \\hrule width\\headwidth height\\headrulewidth\n }%\n \\fancyhead[L]{\\headerlogos}%\n}\n\n% Authors, affiliations, infos %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\renewcommand\\addtolist[5][]{\n \\begingroup\n \\if\\relax#3\\relax\\def\\sep{}\\else\\def\\sep{#5}\\fi\n \\let\\protect\\@unexpandable@protect\n \\xdef#3{\\expandafter{#3}\\sep #4[#1]{#2}}%\n \\endgroup\n}\n\n\\newcommand\\authorlist{}\n\\newcommand\\authorformat[2][]{{\\sffamily \\bfseries #2$^{#1}$}}\n\\renewcommand\\author[2][]{\\addtolist[#1]{#2}{\\authorlist}{\\authorformat}{, }}\n\n\\newcommand\\affiliationlist{}\n\\newcommand\\affiliationformat[2][]{{\\normalsize $^{#1}$#2}}\n\\newcommand\\affiliation[2][]{\\addtolist[#1]{#2}{\\affiliationlist}{\\affiliationformat}{, }}\n\n\\newcommand\\contributionlist{}\n\\newcommand\\contributionformat[2][]{{\\small $^{#1}$#2}}\n\\newcommand\\contribution[2][]{\\addtolist[#1]{#2}{\\contributionlist}{\\contributionformat}{, }}\n\n\\newcommand\\metadatalist{}\n\\newcommand\\metadataformat[2][]{{\\small {\\sffamily \\bfseries #1:} #2}}\n\\newcommand\\metadata[2][]{\\addtolist[#1]{#2}{\\metadatalist}{\\metadataformat}{\\par}}\n\n\\renewcommand{\\abstract}[1]{\\def\\abstractlist{{\\color{metafg} #1}}}\n\\newcommand{\\email}[1]{\\href{mailto:#1}{\\texttt{#1}}}\n\n\\renewcommand\\date[1]{\\metadata[Date]{#1}}\n\\newcommand\\correspondence[1]{\\metadata[Correspondence]{#1}}\n\n\\renewcommand{\\title}[1]{\\newcommand{\\titlelist}{{\\huge\\sffamily\\bfseries #1}}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\beginappendix}{\\appendix{\\huge\\sffamily Appendix\\par}}\n\n% Titlebox %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\newcommand{\\mymaketitle}{%\n \\thispagestyle{gr2firstpage}%\n \\tcbset{enhanced,frame hidden}\n \\tcbset{left=0.5cm}\n \\tcbset{right=0.5cm}\n \\tcbset{top=0.5cm}\n \\tcbset{bottom=0.5cm}\n \\tcbset{arc=10pt}\n \\tcbset{colback=metabg}\n \\tcbset{before skip=0pt}\n \\tcbset{grow to left by=1.5pt}\n \\tcbset{grow to right by=1.5pt}\n \\tcbset{overlay={\\node[\n anchor=south east,\n at= (frame.south east),\n xshift=-0.5cm,\n yshift=0.5cm] {\\includegraphics[width=1.5cm]{assets/logometa.pdf}};}}\n %\n \\begin{tcolorbox}\n \\setlength{\\parindent}{0cm}\n \\setlength{\\parskip}{0.5cm}\n {\n \\setlength{\\parskip}{0cm}\n \\raggedright\n \\nohyphens\n %\n {\n \\setstretch{1.618}\n \\titlelist\\par\n }\n \\vskip 0.2cm\n %\n \\authorlist\\par\n \\vskip 0.2cm\n %\n \\affiliationlist\\par\n %\n \\contributionlist\\par\n }\n %\n \\abstractlist\\par\n %\n \\vskip 0.5cm\n %\n {\n \\setlength{\\parskip}{0cm}\n \\ifdefempty{\\metadatalist}{\\vspace*{0.65cm}}{\\metadatalist\\par}\n }\n \\end{tcolorbox}\n \\tcbset{reset}\n \\FloatBarrier\n}\n\n\\if@twocolumn%\n\\renewcommand{\\maketitle}{\n\\twocolumn[%\n \\mymaketitle\n \\vskip 0.38cm\n]\n}%\n\\else%\n\\renewcommand{\\maketitle}{\n \\mymaketitle\n}%\n\\fi\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: output.bbl\n================================================\n\\begin{thebibliography}{38}\n\\providecommand{\\natexlab}[1]{#1}\n\\providecommand{\\url}[1]{\\texttt{#1}}\n\\expandafter\\ifx\\csname urlstyle\\endcsname\\relax\n \\providecommand{\\doi}[1]{doi: #1}\\else\n \\providecommand{\\doi}{doi: \\begingroup \\urlstyle{rm}\\Url}\\fi\n\n\\bibitem[Behdin et~al.(2025)Behdin, Dai, Fatahibaarzi, Gupta, Song, Tang, Sang,\n Dexter, Zhu, Zhu, et~al.]{behdin2025scaling}\nKayhan Behdin, Yun Dai, Ata Fatahibaarzi, Aman Gupta, Qingquan Song, Shao Tang,\n Hejian Sang, Gregory Dexter, Sirou Zhu, Siyu Zhu, et~al.\n\\newblock Efficient ai in practice: Training and deployment of efficient llms\n for industry applications.\n\\newblock 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Chen et~al.(2025)Chen, Li, Gong, Jiang, Fei, Yang, Shan, Yu, Wang,\n Zhu, et~al.]{chen2025minimax}\nAili Chen, Aonian Li, Bangwei Gong, Binyang Jiang, Bo~Fei, Bo~Yang, Boji Shan,\n Changqing Yu, Chao Wang, Cheng Zhu, et~al.\n\\newblock Minimax-m1: Scaling test-time compute efficiently with lightning\n attention.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.13585}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Deng et~al.(2025)Deng, Wang, Cai, Ren, Hu, Ding, Luo, and\n Zhou]{deng2025onerec}\nJiaxin Deng, Shiyao Wang, Kuo Cai, Lejian Ren, Qigen Hu, Weifeng Ding, Qiang\n Luo, and Guorui Zhou.\n\\newblock Onerec: Unifying retrieve and rank with generative recommender and\n iterative preference alignment.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18965}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Feng et~al.(2025)Feng, Hua, Lei, Xie, Yang, Long, and\n You]{feng2025iranker}\nTao Feng, Zhigang Hua, Zijie Lei, Yan Xie, Shuang Yang, Bo~Long, and Jiaxuan\n You.\n\\newblock Iranker: Towards ranking foundation model.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21638}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Gao et~al.(2024)Gao, Zhao, Li, Zhao, Wu, Guo, Liu, and\n Yin]{gao2024smlp4rec}\nJingtong Gao, Xiangyu Zhao, Muyang Li, Minghao Zhao, Runze Wu, Ruocheng Guo,\n Yiding Liu, and Dawei Yin.\n\\newblock Smlp4rec: An efficient all-mlp architecture for sequential\n recommendations.\n\\newblock \\emph{ACM Transactions on Information Systems}, 42\\penalty0\n (3):\\penalty0 1--23, 2024.\n\n\\bibitem[Gao et~al.(2025)Gao, Chen, Zhao, Liu, Li, Wang, Wang, Guo, and\n Tang]{gao2025llm4rerank}\nJingtong Gao, Bo~Chen, Xiangyu Zhao, Weiwen Liu, Xiangyang Li, Yichao Wang,\n Wanyu Wang, Huifeng Guo, and Ruiming Tang.\n\\newblock Llm4rerank: Llm-based auto-reranking framework for recommendations.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025}, pages\n 228--239, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Geng et~al.(2022)Geng, Liu, Fu, Ge, and Zhang]{geng2022recommendation}\nShijie Geng, Shuchang Liu, Zuohui Fu, Yingqiang Ge, and Yongfeng Zhang.\n\\newblock Recommendation as language processing (rlp): A unified pretrain,\n personalized prompt \\& predict paradigm (p5).\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender\n Systems}, pages 299--315, 2022.\n\n\\bibitem[Gu et~al.(2025)Gu, Zhong, Xia, Yang, Lu, Jiang, and Gai]{gu2025r}\nHao Gu, Rui Zhong, Yu~Xia, Wei Yang, Chi Lu, Peng Jiang, and Kun Gai.\n\\newblock R 4ec: A reasoning, reflection, and refinement framework for\n recommendation systems.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Conference on Recommender\n Systems}, pages 411--421, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[He et~al.(2025)He, Heldt, Hong, Keshavan, Mao, Mehta, Su, Tsai, Wang,\n Wang, et~al.]{he2025plum}\nRuining He, Lukasz Heldt, Lichan Hong, Raghunandan Keshavan, Shifan Mao, Nikhil\n Mehta, Zhengyang Su, Alicia Tsai, Yueqi Wang, Shao-Chuan Wang, et~al.\n\\newblock Plum: Adapting pre-trained language models for industrial-scale\n generative recommendations.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.07784}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Lee et~al.(2022)Lee, Kim, Kim, Cho, and Han]{lee2022autoregressive}\nDoyup Lee, Chiheon Kim, Saehoon Kim, Minsu Cho, and Wook-Shin Han.\n\\newblock Autoregressive image generation using residual quantization.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision\n and pattern recognition}, pages 11523--11532, 2022.\n\n\\bibitem[Liang et~al.(2025)Liang, Liu, Jin, Liu, Suo, Zhou, Zhou, Chen, Zheng,\n Li, et~al.]{liang2025external}\nMingfu Liang, Xi~Liu, Rong Jin, Boyang Liu, Qiuling Suo, Qinghai Zhou, Song\n Zhou, Laming Chen, Hua Zheng, Zhiyuan Li, et~al.\n\\newblock External large foundation model: How to efficiently serve trillions\n of parameters for online ads recommendation.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Companion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025},\n pages 344--353, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Liang et~al.(2026)Liang, Li, Xu, Asadi, Liu, Gu, Rangadurai, Shyu,\n Wang, Yang, et~al.]{liang2026generative}\nMingfu Liang, Yufei Li, Jay Xu, Kavosh Asadi, Xi~Liu, Shuo Gu, Kaushik\n Rangadurai, Frank Shyu, Shuaiwen Wang, Song Yang, et~al.\n\\newblock Generative reasoning re-ranker.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.07774}, 2026.\n\n\\bibitem[Liu et~al.()Liu, Xi, Qin, Sun, Chen, Zhang, Zhang, and\n Tang]{liuneural}\nWeiwen Liu, Yunjia Xi, Jiarui Qin, Fei Sun, Bo~Chen, Weinan Zhang, Rui Zhang,\n and Ruiming Tang.\n\\newblock Neural re-ranking in multi-stage recommender systems: A review.\n\n\\bibitem[Liu et~al.(2025)Liu, Wang, Wang, Zhang, Deng, Bao, Zhang, Li, Zheng,\n Wu, Hu, Hu, Luo, Ren, Zhang, Wang, Cai, Wu, Cheng, Cheng, Ren, Wang, Su,\n Tang, Gai, and Zhou]{liu2025onerec}\nZhanyu Liu, Shiyao Wang, Xingmei Wang, Rongzhou Zhang, Jiaxin Deng, Honghui\n Bao, Jinghao Zhang, Wuchao Li, Pengfei Zheng, Xiangyu Wu, Yifei Hu, Qigen Hu,\n Xinchen Luo, Lejian Ren, Zixing Zhang, Qianqian Wang, Kuo Cai, Yunfan Wu,\n Hongtao Cheng, Zexuan Cheng, Lu~Ren, Huanjie Wang, Yi~Su, Ruiming Tang, Kun\n Gai, and Guorui Zhou.\n\\newblock Onerec-think: In-text reasoning for generative recommendation.\n\\newblock \\emph{CoRR}, abs/2510.11639, 2025.\n\\newblock \\doi{10.48550/ARXIV.2510.11639}.\n\\newblock \\url{https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.11639}.\n\n\\bibitem[Luo et~al.(2025)Luo, Chen, Zhang, Hang, Gu, Zhang, Liu, Chen, Fan,\n Liang, et~al.]{luo2025meta}\nLiang Luo, Yuxin Chen, Zhengyu Zhang, Mengyue Hang, Andrew Gu, Buyun Zhang,\n Boyang Liu, Chen Chen, Chengze Fan, Dong Liang, et~al.\n\\newblock Meta lattice: Model space redesign for cost-effective industry-scale\n ads recommendations.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.09200}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Rajput et~al.(2023)Rajput, Mehta, Singh, Hulikal~Keshavan, Vu, Heldt,\n Hong, Tay, Tran, Samost, et~al.]{rajput2023recommender}\nShashank Rajput, Nikhil Mehta, Anima Singh, Raghunandan Hulikal~Keshavan, Trung\n Vu, Lukasz Heldt, Lichan Hong, Yi~Tay, Vinh Tran, Jonah Samost, et~al.\n\\newblock Recommender systems with generative retrieval.\n\\newblock \\emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n 36:\\penalty0 10299--10315, 2023.\n\n\\bibitem[Ramanujam et~al.(2025)Ramanujam, Alonso, Kataria, Dangi, Gupta,\n Tiwana, Somaiya, Simon, Byrne, Ha, et~al.]{ramanujam2025large}\nSudarshan~Srinivasa Ramanujam, Antonio Alonso, Saurabh Kataria, Siddharth\n Dangi, Akhilesh Gupta, Birjodh~Singh Tiwana, Manas Somaiya, Luke Simon, David\n Byrne, Sojeong Ha, et~al.\n\\newblock Large scale retrieval for the linkedin feed using causal language\n models.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14223}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Shao et~al.(2024)Shao, Wang, Zhu, Xu, Song, Bi, Zhang, Zhang, Li, Wu,\n et~al.]{shao2024deepseekmath}\nZhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Xiao Bi, Haowei\n Zhang, Mingchuan Zhang, YK~Li, Yang Wu, et~al.\n\\newblock Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open\n language models.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300}, 2024.\n\n\\bibitem[Team(2025)]{qwen3technicalreport}\nQwen Team.\n\\newblock Qwen3 technical report, 2025.\n\\newblock \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09388}.\n\n\\bibitem[Wang et~al.(2021)Wang, Shivanna, Cheng, Jain, Lin, Hong, and\n Chi]{wang2021dcn}\nRuoxi Wang, Rakesh Shivanna, Derek Cheng, Sagar Jain, Dong Lin, Lichan Hong,\n and Ed~Chi.\n\\newblock Dcn v2: Improved deep \\& cross network and practical lessons for\n web-scale learning to rank systems.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the web conference 2021}, pages 1785--1797,\n 2021.\n\n\\bibitem[Wang et~al.(2025)Wang, Sun, and Zhang]{wang2025llm}\nYaqi Wang, Haojia Sun, and Shuting Zhang.\n\\newblock Llm as explainable re-ranker for recommendation system.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.03439}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Wang et~al.(2024)Wang, Zhao, Wang, Huang, Fan, Zhang, Wang, Wang, and\n Liu]{wang2024strategic}\nYu~Wang, Shiwan Zhao, Zhihu Wang, Heyuan Huang, Ming Fan, Yubo Zhang, Zhixing\n Wang, Haijun Wang, and Ting Liu.\n\\newblock Strategic chain-of-thought: Guiding accurate reasoning in llms\n through strategy elicitation.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.03271}, 2024.\n\n\\bibitem[Wei et~al.(2022)Wei, Wang, Schuurmans, Bosma, Xia, Chi, Le, Zhou,\n et~al.]{wei2022chain}\nJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed~Chi, Quoc~V\n Le, Denny Zhou, et~al.\n\\newblock Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language\n models.\n\\newblock \\emph{Advances in neural information processing systems},\n 35:\\penalty0 24824--24837, 2022.\n\n\\bibitem[Wu et~al.(2024)Wu, Zheng, Qiu, Wang, Gu, Shen, Qin, Zhu, Zhu, Liu,\n et~al.]{wu2024survey}\nLikang Wu, Zhi Zheng, Zhaopeng Qiu, Hao Wang, Hongchao Gu, Tingjia Shen, Chuan\n Qin, Chen Zhu, Hengshu Zhu, Qi~Liu, et~al.\n\\newblock A survey on large language models for recommendation.\n\\newblock \\emph{World Wide Web}, 27\\penalty0 (5):\\penalty0 60, 2024.\n\n\\bibitem[Xia et~al.(2025)Xia, Wang, Liu, Li, Yu, Chen, McAuley, and\n Li]{xia2025beyond}\nYu~Xia, Rui Wang, Xu~Liu, Mingyan Li, Tong Yu, Xiang Chen, Julian McAuley, and\n Shuai Li.\n\\newblock Beyond chain-of-thought: A survey of chain-of-{X} paradigms for\n {LLM}s.\n\\newblock In Owen Rambow, Leo Wanner, Marianna Apidianaki, Hend Al-Khalifa,\n Barbara~Di Eugenio, and Steven Schockaert, editors, \\emph{Proceedings of the\n 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics}, pages\n 10795--10809, Abu Dhabi, UAE, January 2025. Association for Computational\n Linguistics.\n\\newblock \\url{https://aclanthology.org/2025.coling-main.719/}.\n\n\\bibitem[Xu et~al.(2025)Xu, Dong, Hou, Wang, Li, Gao, Zhong, and Cai]{xu2025mm}\nMingjun Xu, Jinhan Dong, Jue Hou, Zehui Wang, Sihang Li, Zhifeng Gao, Renxin\n Zhong, and Hengxing Cai.\n\\newblock Mm-r5: Multimodal reasoning-enhanced reranker via reinforcement\n learning for document retrieval.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.12364}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Yu et~al.(2025)Yu, Zhang, Zhu, Yuan, Zuo, Yue, Dai, Fan, Liu, Liu,\n et~al.]{yu2025dapo}\nQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan, Xiaochen Zuo, Yu~Yue, Weinan\n Dai, Tiantian Fan, Gaohong Liu, Lingjun Liu, et~al.\n\\newblock Dapo: An open-source llm reinforcement learning system at scale.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14476}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Zhang et~al.(2022)Zhang, Luo, Liu, Li, Chen, Zhang, Wei, Hao, Tsang,\n Wang, et~al.]{zhang2022dhen}\nBuyun Zhang, Liang Luo, Xi~Liu, Jay Li, Zeliang Chen, Weilin Zhang, Xiaohan\n Wei, Yuchen Hao, Michael Tsang, Wenjun Wang, et~al.\n\\newblock Dhen: A deep and hierarchical ensemble network for large-scale\n click-through rate prediction.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11014}, 2022.\n\n\\bibitem[Zhang et~al.(2024)Zhang, Luo, Chen, Nie, Liu, Li, Zhao, Hao, Yao, Wen,\n et~al.]{zhang2024wukong}\nBuyun Zhang, Liang Luo, Yuxin Chen, Jade Nie, Xi~Liu, Shen Li, Yanli Zhao,\n Yuchen Hao, Yantao Yao, Ellie~Dingqiao Wen, et~al.\n\\newblock Wukong: towards a scaling law for large-scale recommendation.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine\n Learning}, pages 59421--59434, 2024.\n\n\\bibitem[Zhang et~al.(2025{\\natexlab{a}})Zhang, Wang, Qiu, Reddy, and\n Agrawal]{zhang2025rearank}\nLe~Zhang, Bo~Wang, Xipeng Qiu, Siva Reddy, and Aishwarya Agrawal.\n\\newblock {REARANK}: Reasoning re-ranking agent via reinforcement learning.\n\\newblock In Christos Christodoulopoulos, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Carolyn Rose, and\n Violet Peng, editors, \\emph{Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical\n Methods in Natural Language Processing}, pages 2458--2471, Suzhou, China,\n November 2025{\\natexlab{a}}. Association for Computational Linguistics.\n\\newblock ISBN 979-8-89176-332-6.\n\\newblock \\doi{10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.125}.\n\\newblock \\url{https://aclanthology.org/2025.emnlp-main.125/}.\n\n\\bibitem[Zhang et~al.(2025{\\natexlab{b}})Zhang, Liu, Zeng, Liang, Yang, Jin,\n Chen, Han, Ma, Long, et~al.]{zhang2025reasonrec}\nYihua Zhang, Xi~Liu, Xihuan Zeng, Mingfu Liang, Jiyan Yang, Rong Jin, Wen-Yen\n Chen, Yiping Han, Hao Ma, Bo~Long, et~al.\n\\newblock Reasonrec: A reasoning-augmented multimodal agent for unified\n recommendation.\n\\newblock In \\emph{ICML 2025 Workshop on Programmatic Representations for Agent\n Learning}, 2025{\\natexlab{b}}.\n\n\\bibitem[Zhao et~al.(2026)Zhao, Xie, Liu, Huang, Pang, Chen, and\n Grover]{zhao2026self}\nSiyan Zhao, Zhihui Xie, Mengchen Liu, Jing Huang, Guan Pang, Feiyu Chen, and\n Aditya Grover.\n\\newblock Self-distilled reasoner: On-policy self-distillation for large\n language models.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.18734}, 2026.\n\n\\bibitem[Zhao et~al.(2024)Zhao, Fan, Li, Liu, Mei, Wang, Wen, Wang, Zhao, Tang,\n et~al.]{zhao2024recommender}\nZihuai Zhao, Wenqi Fan, Jiatong Li, Yunqing Liu, Xiaowei Mei, Yiqi Wang, Zhen\n Wen, Fei Wang, Xiangyu Zhao, Jiliang Tang, et~al.\n\\newblock Recommender systems in the era of large language models (llms).\n\\newblock \\emph{IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering},\n 36\\penalty0 (11):\\penalty0 6889--6907, 2024.\n\n\\bibitem[Zheng et~al.(2025)Zheng, Liu, Li, Chen, Yu, Gao, Dang, Liu, Men, Yang,\n et~al.]{zheng2025group}\nChujie Zheng, Shixuan Liu, Mingze Li, Xiong-Hui Chen, Bowen Yu, Chang Gao, Kai\n Dang, Yuqiong Liu, Rui Men, An~Yang, et~al.\n\\newblock Group sequence policy optimization.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.18071}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Zhou et~al.(2019)Zhou, Mou, Fan, Pi, Bian, Zhou, Zhu, and\n Gai]{zhou2019deep}\nGuorui Zhou, Na~Mou, Ying Fan, Qi~Pi, Weijie Bian, Chang Zhou, Xiaoqiang Zhu,\n and Kun Gai.\n\\newblock Deep interest evolution network for click-through rate prediction.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial\n intelligence}, volume~33, pages 5941--5948, 2019.\n\n\\bibitem[Zhou et~al.(2025{\\natexlab{a}})Zhou, Bao, Huang, Deng, Zhang, She,\n Cai, Ren, Ren, Luo, et~al.]{zhou2025openonerec}\nGuorui Zhou, Honghui Bao, Jiaming Huang, Jiaxin Deng, Jinghao Zhang, Junda She,\n Kuo Cai, Lejian Ren, Lu~Ren, Qiang Luo, et~al.\n\\newblock Openonerec technical report.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.24762}, 2025{\\natexlab{a}}.\n\n\\bibitem[Zhou et~al.(2025{\\natexlab{b}})Zhou, Hu, Cheng, Wang, Deng, Zhang,\n Cai, Ren, Ren, Yu, et~al.]{zhou2025onerec}\nGuorui Zhou, Hengrui Hu, Hongtao Cheng, Huanjie Wang, Jiaxin Deng, Jinghao\n Zhang, Kuo Cai, Lejian Ren, Lu~Ren, Liao Yu, et~al.\n\\newblock Onerec-v2 technical report.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.20900}, 2025{\\natexlab{b}}.\n\n\\bibitem[Zhou et~al.(2025{\\natexlab{c}})Zhou, Gu, Zhan, Liu, Zhou, Xiao, Liang,\n Govindan, Chawla, Yang, et~al.]{zhou2025efficiency}\nHuixue Zhou, Hengrui Gu, Zaifu Zhan, Xi~Liu, Kaixiong Zhou, Yongkang Xiao,\n Mingfu Liang, Srinivas~Prasad Govindan, Piyush Chawla, Jiyan Yang, et~al.\n\\newblock The efficiency vs. accuracy trade-off: Optimizing rag-enhanced llm\n recommender systems using multi-head early exit.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association\n for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)}, pages 26443--26458,\n 2025{\\natexlab{c}}.\n\n\\end{thebibliography}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: paper.bib\n================================================\n@article{liang2026generative,\n title={Generative Reasoning Re-ranker},\n author={Liang, Mingfu and Li, Yufei and Xu, Jay and Asadi, Kavosh and Liu, Xi and Gu, Shuo and Rangadurai, Kaushik and Shyu, Frank and Wang, Shuaiwen and Yang, Song and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.07774},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n%%%%% Theoretical Analysis\n@inproceedings{bartlett2018gradient,\n title={Gradient descent with identity initialization efficiently learns positive definite linear transformations by deep residual networks},\n author={Bartlett, Peter and Helmbold, Dave and Long, Philip},\n booktitle={ICML},\n pages={521--530},\n year={2018},\n organization={PMLR}\n}\n\n%%%%% distillation\n\n@article{yang2022toward,\n title={Toward understanding privileged features distillation in learning-to-rank},\n author={Yang, Shuo and Sanghavi, Sujay and Rahmanian, Holakou and Bakus, Jan and SVN, Vishwanathan},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={35},\n pages={26658--26670},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n%%%%% Benchmarks\n\n@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/sigir/ZhuDSMLCXZ22,\n author = {Jieming Zhu and\n Quanyu Dai and\n Liangcai Su and\n Rong Ma and\n Jinyang Liu and\n Guohao Cai and\n Xi Xiao and\n Rui Zhang},\n editor = {Enrique Amig{\\'{o}} and\n Pablo Castells and\n Julio Gonzalo and\n Ben Carterette and\n J. Shane Culpepper and\n Gabriella Kazai},\n title = {{BARS:} Towards Open Benchmarking for Recommender Systems},\n pages = {2912--2923},\n publisher = {{ACM}},\n year = {2022},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3477495.3531723},\n doi = {10.1145/3477495.3531723},\n timestamp = {Sun, 04 Aug 2024 19:39:40 +0200},\n biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/sigir/ZhuDSMLCXZ22.bib},\n bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/cikm/ZhuLYZH21,\n author = {Jieming Zhu and\n Jinyang Liu and\n Shuai Yang and\n Qi Zhang and\n Xiuqiang He},\n editor = {Gianluca Demartini and\n Guido Zuccon and\n J. Shane Culpepper and\n Zi Huang and\n Hanghang Tong},\n title = {Open Benchmarking for Click-Through Rate Prediction},\n pages = {2759--2769},\n publisher = {{ACM}},\n year = {2021},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3459637.3482486},\n doi = {10.1145/3459637.3482486},\n timestamp = {Tue, 12 Nov 2024 16:50:49 +0100},\n biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/conf/cikm/ZhuLYZH21.bib},\n bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2024scaling,\n title={Scaling User Modeling: Large-scale Online User Representations for Ads Personalization in Meta},\n author={Zhang, Wei and Li, Dai and Liang, Chen and Zhou, Fang and Zhang, Zhongke and Wang, Xuewei and Li, Ru and Zhou, Yi and Huang, Yaning and Liang, Dong and others},\n booktitle={Companion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024},\n pages={47--55},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n%%%%% metrics\n@inproceedings{he2014practical,\n title={Practical lessons from predicting clicks on ads at facebook},\n author={He, Xinran and Pan, Junfeng and Jin, Ou and Xu, Tianbing and Liu, Bo and Xu, Tao and Shi, Yanxin and Atallah, Antoine and Herbrich, Ralf and Bowers, Stuart and others},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the eighth international workshop on data mining for online advertising},\n pages={1--9},\n year={2014}\n}\n\n%%%%% datasets\n\n@misc{Kuaishou,\n title = {Kuaishou,\n howpublished = {\\url{https://www.kuaishou.com/activity/uimc}}\n}\n}\n\n@misc{TaobaoAd,\n title = {TaobaoAd,\n howpublished = {\\url{https://tianchi.aliyun.com/dataset/56}}\n}\n}\n\n%%%%% Multi-task Learning\n@inproceedings{li2019routing,\n title={Routing micro-videos via a temporal graph-guided recommendation system},\n author={Li, Yongqi and Liu, Meng and Yin, Jianhua and Cui, Chaoran and Xu, Xin-Shun and Nie, Liqiang},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on multimedia},\n pages={1464--1472},\n year={2019}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhu2023reloop2,\n title={ReLoop2: Building Self-Adaptive Recommendation Models via Responsive Error Compensation Loop},\n author={Zhu, Jieming and Cai, Guohao and Huang, Junjie and Dong, Zhenhua and Tang, Ruiming and Zhang, Weinan},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining},\n pages={5728--5738},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@misc{Tianchi,\n title = {Ad display/click data on taobao.com, 2018.},\n author = {Tianchi},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://tianchi.aliyun.com/dataset/56}}\n}\n\n@article{liu2025onerec,\n author = {Zhanyu Liu and\n Shiyao Wang and\n Xingmei Wang and\n Rongzhou Zhang and\n Jiaxin Deng and\n Honghui Bao and\n Jinghao Zhang and\n Wuchao Li and\n Pengfei Zheng and\n Xiangyu Wu and\n Yifei Hu and\n Qigen Hu and\n Xinchen Luo and\n Lejian Ren and\n Zixing Zhang and\n Qianqian Wang and\n Kuo Cai and\n Yunfan Wu and\n Hongtao Cheng and\n Zexuan Cheng and\n Lu Ren and\n Huanjie Wang and\n Yi Su and\n Ruiming Tang and\n Kun Gai and\n Guorui Zhou},\n title = {OneRec-Think: In-Text Reasoning for Generative Recommendation},\n journal = {CoRR},\n volume = {abs/2510.11639},\n year = {2025},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.11639},\n doi = {10.48550/ARXIV.2510.11639},\n eprinttype = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2510.11639},\n timestamp = {Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:04:04 +0100},\n biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/journals/corr/abs-2510-11639.bib},\n bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}\n}\n\n\n@article{yu2025dapo,\n title={Dapo: An open-source llm reinforcement learning system at scale},\n author={Yu, Qiying and Zhang, Zheng and Zhu, Ruofei and Yuan, Yufeng and Zuo, Xiaochen and Yue, Yu and Dai, Weinan and Fan, Tiantian and Liu, Gaohong and Liu, Lingjun and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14476},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{wang2024strategic,\n title={Strategic chain-of-thought: Guiding accurate reasoning in llms through strategy elicitation},\n author={Wang, Yu and Zhao, Shiwan and Wang, Zhihu and Huang, Heyuan and Fan, Ming and Zhang, Yubo and Wang, Zhixing and Wang, Haijun and Liu, Ting},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.03271},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n\n\n@inproceedings{xia2025beyond,\n title = \"Beyond Chain-of-Thought: A Survey of Chain-of-{X} Paradigms for {LLM}s\",\n author = \"Xia, Yu and\n Wang, Rui and\n Liu, Xu and\n Li, Mingyan and\n Yu, Tong and\n Chen, Xiang and\n McAuley, Julian and\n Li, Shuai\",\n editor = \"Rambow, Owen and\n Wanner, Leo and\n Apidianaki, Marianna and\n Al-Khalifa, Hend and\n Eugenio, Barbara Di and\n Schockaert, Steven\",\n booktitle = \"Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics\",\n month = jan,\n year = \"2025\",\n address = \"Abu Dhabi, UAE\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computational Linguistics\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2025.coling-main.719/\",\n pages = \"10795--10809\",\n abstract = \"Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has been a widely adopted prompting method, eliciting impressive reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). Inspired by the sequential thought structure of CoT, a number of Chain-of-X (CoX) methods have been developed to address challenges across diverse domains and tasks. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey of Chain-of-X methods for LLMs in different contexts. Specifically, we categorize them by taxonomies of nodes, i.e., the X in CoX, and application tasks. We also discuss the findings and implications of existing CoX methods, as well as potential future directions. Our survey aims to serve as a detailed and up-to-date resource for researchers seeking to apply the idea of CoT to broader scenarios.\"\n}\n\n@article{feng2025iranker,\n title={IRanker: Towards Ranking Foundation Model},\n author={Feng, Tao and Hua, Zhigang and Lei, Zijie and Xie, Yan and Yang, Shuang and Long, Bo and You, Jiaxuan},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21638},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{xu2025mm,\n title={MM-R5: MultiModal Reasoning-Enhanced ReRanker via Reinforcement Learning for Document Retrieval},\n author={Xu, Mingjun and Dong, Jinhan and Hou, Jue and Wang, Zehui and Li, Sihang and Gao, Zhifeng and Zhong, Renxin and Cai, Hengxing},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.12364},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2025rearank,\n title = \"{REARANK}: Reasoning Re-ranking Agent via Reinforcement Learning\",\n author = \"Zhang, Le and\n Wang, Bo and\n Qiu, Xipeng and\n Reddy, Siva and\n Agrawal, Aishwarya\",\n editor = \"Christodoulopoulos, Christos and\n Chakraborty, Tanmoy and\n Rose, Carolyn and\n Peng, Violet\",\n booktitle = \"Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing\",\n month = nov,\n year = \"2025\",\n address = \"Suzhou, China\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computational Linguistics\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2025.emnlp-main.125/\",\n doi = \"10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.125\",\n pages = \"2458--2471\",\n ISBN = \"979-8-89176-332-6\",\n abstract = \"We present REARANK, a large language model (LLM)-based listwise reasoning rerank- ing agent. REARANK explicitly reasons be- fore reranking, significantly improving both performance and interpretability. Leveraging reinforcement learning and data augmentation, REARANK achieves substantial improvements over baseline models across popular informa- tion retrieval benchmarks, notably requiring only 179 annotated samples. Built on top of Qwen2.5-7B, our REARANK-7B demonstrates performance comparable to GPT-4 on both in- domain and out-of-domain benchmarks and even surpasses GPT-4 on reasoning-intensive BRIGHT benchmarks. These results under- score the effectiveness of our approach and highlight how reinforcement learning can en- hance LLM reasoning capabilities in reranking.\"\n}\n\n@article{zheng2025group,\n title={Group sequence policy optimization},\n author={Zheng, Chujie and Liu, Shixuan and Li, Mingze and Chen, Xiong-Hui and Yu, Bowen and Gao, Chang and Dang, Kai and Liu, Yuqiong and Men, Rui and Yang, An and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.18071},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n\n@article{chen2025minimax,\n title={MiniMax-M1: Scaling Test-Time Compute Efficiently with Lightning Attention},\n author={Chen, Aili and Li, Aonian and Gong, Bangwei and Jiang, Binyang and Fei, Bo and Yang, Bo and Shan, Boji and Yu, Changqing and Wang, Chao and Zhu, Cheng and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.13585},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n\n@article{shao2024deepseekmath,\n title={Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models},\n author={Shao, Zhihong and Wang, Peiyi and Zhu, Qihao and Xu, Runxin and Song, Junxiao and Bi, Xiao and Zhang, Haowei and Zhang, Mingchuan and Li, YK and Wu, Yang and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{he2016ups,\n title={Ups and downs: Modeling the visual evolution of fashion trends with one-class collaborative filtering},\n author={He, Ruining and McAuley, Julian},\n booktitle={proceedings of the 25th international conference on world wide web},\n pages={507--517},\n year={2016}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{khani2024bridging,\n title={Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Hidden Challenges in Knowledge Distillation for Online Ranking Systems},\n author={Khani, Nikhil and Wei, Li and Nath, Aniruddh and Andrews, Shawn and Yang, Shuo and Liu, Yang and Abbo, Pendo and Kula, Maciej and Kahn, Jarrod and Zhao, Zhe and others},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems},\n pages={758--761},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{lee2024continual,\n title={Continual Collaborative Distillation for Recommender System},\n author={Lee, Gyuseok and Kang, SeongKu and Kweon, Wonbin and Yu, Hwanjo},\n booktitle={SIGKDD},\n pages={1495--1505},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{anil2022factory,\n title={On the factory floor: ML engineering for industrial-scale ads recommendation models},\n author={Anil, Rohan and Gadanho, Sandra and Huang, Da and Jacob, Nijith and Li, Zhuoshu and Lin, Dong and Phillips, Todd and Pop, Cristina and Regan, Kevin and Shamir, Gil I and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.05310},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{zeng2024interformer,\n title={InterFormer: Towards Effective Heterogeneous Interaction Learning for Click-Through Rate Prediction},\n author={Zeng, Zhichen and Liu, Xiaolong and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.09852},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n\n@article{li2022shadow,\n title={Shadow knowledge distillation: Bridging offline and online knowledge transfer},\n author={Li, Lujun and Jin, Zhe},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={35},\n pages={635--649},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{xiao2020deep,\n title={Deep multi-interest network for click-through rate prediction},\n author={Xiao, Zhibo and Yang, Luwei and Jiang, Wen and Wei, Yi and Hu, Yi and Wang, Hao},\n booktitle={CIKM},\n pages={2265--2268},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@incollection{wang2017deep,\n title={Deep \\& cross network for ad click predictions},\n author={Wang, Ruoxi and Fu, Bin and Fu, Gang and Wang, Mingliang},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the ADKDD'17},\n pages={1--7},\n year={2017}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{rendle2010factorization,\n title={Factorization machines},\n author={Rendle, Steffen},\n booktitle={2010 IEEE International conference on data mining},\n pages={995--1000},\n year={2010},\n organization={IEEE}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{sun2021fm2,\n title={FM2: Field-matrixed factorization machines for recommender systems},\n author={Sun, Yang and Pan, Junwei and Zhang, Alex and Flores, Aaron},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the web conference 2021},\n pages={2828--2837},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{guo2017deepfm,\n title={DeepFM: a factorization-machine based neural network for CTR prediction},\n author={Guo, Huifeng and Tang, Ruiming and Ye, Yunming and Li, Zhenguo and He, Xiuqiang},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence},\n pages={1725--1731},\n year={2017}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{wang2019improving,\n title={Improving Relevance Prediction with Transfer Learning in Large-scale Retrieval Systems},\n author={Wang, Ruoxi and Zhao, Zhe and Yi, Xinyang and Yang, Ji and Cheng, Derek Zhiyuan and Hong, Lichan and Tjoa, Steve and Kang, Jieqi and Ettinger, Evan and Chi, H},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 1st Adaptive \\& Multitask Learning Workshop},\n year={2019}\n}\n\n\n@article{zhang2022dhen,\n title={DHEN: A deep and hierarchical ensemble network for large-scale click-through rate prediction},\n author={Zhang, Buyun and Luo, Liang and Liu, Xi and Li, Jay and Chen, Zeliang and Zhang, Weilin and Wei, Xiaohan and Hao, Yuchen and Tsang, Michael and Wang, Wenjun and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11014},\n year={2022}\n}\n@article{naumov2019deep,\n title={Deep learning recommendation model for personalization and recommendation systems},\n author={Naumov, Maxim and Mudigere, Dheevatsa and Shi, Hao-Jun Michael and Huang, Jianyu and Sundaraman, Narayanan and Park, Jongsoo and Wang, Xiaodong and Gupta, Udit and Wu, Carole-Jean and Azzolini, Alisson G and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.00091},\n year={2019}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{pan2024ads,\n title={Ads recommendation in a collapsed and entangled world},\n author={Pan, Junwei and Xue, Wei and Wang, Ximei and Yu, Haibin and Liu, Xun and Quan, Shijie and Qiu, Xueming and Liu, Dapeng and Xiao, Lei and Jiang, Jie},\n booktitle={SIGKDD},\n pages={5566--5577},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{ying2018graph,\n title={Graph convolutional neural networks for web-scale recommender systems},\n author={Ying, Rex and He, Ruining and Chen, Kaifeng and Eksombatchai, Pong and Hamilton, William L and Leskovec, Jure},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery \\& data mining},\n pages={974--983},\n year={2018}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{geng2022recommendation,\n title={Recommendation as language processing (rlp): A unified pretrain, personalized prompt \\& predict paradigm (p5)},\n author={Geng, Shijie and Liu, Shuchang and Fu, Zuohui and Ge, Yingqiang and Zhang, Yongfeng},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems},\n pages={299--315},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhu2024collaborative,\n title={Collaborative large language model for recommender systems},\n author={Zhu, Yaochen and Wu, Liang and Guo, Qi and Hong, Liangjie and Li, Jundong},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024},\n pages={3162--3172},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{li2020interpretable,\n title={Interpretable click-through rate prediction through hierarchical attention},\n author={Li, Zeyu and Cheng, Wei and Chen, Yang and Chen, Haifeng and Wang, Wei},\n booktitle=WSDM},\n pages={313--321},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@article{achiam2023gpt,\n title={Gpt-4 technical report},\n author={Achiam, Josh and Adler, Steven and Agarwal, Sandhini and Ahmad, Lama and Akkaya, Ilge and Aleman, Florencia Leoni and Almeida, Diogo and Altenschmidt, Janko and Altman, Sam and Anadkat, Shyamal and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{touvron2023llama,\n title={Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models},\n author={Touvron, Hugo and Lavril, Thibaut and Izacard, Gautier and Martinet, Xavier and Lachaux, Marie-Anne and Lacroix, Timoth{\\'e}e and Rozi{\\`e}re, Baptiste and Goyal, Naman and Hambro, Eric and Azhar, Faisal and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{kang2021item,\n title={Item-side ranking regularized distillation for recommender system},\n author={Kang, SeongKu and Hwang, Junyoung and Kweon, Wonbin and Yu, Hwanjo},\n journal={Information Sciences},\n volume={580},\n pages={15--34},\n year={2021},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{liu2022position,\n title={Position awareness modeling with knowledge distillation for CTR prediction},\n author={Liu, Congcong and Li, Yuejiang and Zhu, Jian and Teng, Fei and Zhao, Xiwei and Peng, Changping and Lin, Zhangang and Shao, Jingping},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems},\n pages={562--566},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{kweon2021bidirectional,\n title={Bidirectional distillation for top-K recommender system},\n author={Kweon, Wonbin and Kang, SeongKu and Yu, Hwanjo},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021},\n pages={3861--3871},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhu2020ensembled,\n title={Ensembled CTR prediction via knowledge distillation},\n author={Zhu, Jieming and Liu, Jinyang and Li, Weiqi and Lai, Jincai and He, Xiuqiang and Chen, Liang and Zheng, Zibin},\n booktitle={CIKM},\n pages={2941--2958},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@misc{zookeeper,\n title = {ZooKeeper},\n author={Apache},\n url = {https://zookeeper.apache.org/},\n year = {2023}\n}\n\n@article{gou2021knowledge,\n title={Knowledge distillation: A survey},\n author={Gou, Jianping and Yu, Baosheng and Maybank, Stephen J and Tao, Dacheng},\n journal={International Journal of Computer Vision},\n volume={129},\n number={6},\n pages={1789--1819},\n year={2021},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{hinton2015distilling,\n title={Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network},\n author={Hinton, Geoffrey},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531},\n year={2015}\n}\n\n@article{kang2024unbiased,\n title={Unbiased, Effective, and Efficient Distillation from Heterogeneous Models for Recommender Systems},\n author={Kang, SeongKu and Kweon, Wonbin and Lee, Dongha and Lian, Jianxun and Xie, Xing and Yu, Hwanjo},\n journal={ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems},\n year={2024},\n publisher={ACM New York, NY}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{chen2023unbiased,\n title={Unbiased knowledge distillation for recommendation},\n author={Chen, Gang and Chen, Jiawei and Feng, Fuli and Zhou, Sheng and He, Xiangnan},\n booktitle={WSDM},\n pages={976--984},\n year={2023}\n}\n@inproceedings{kang2023distillation,\n title={Distillation from heterogeneous models for top-k recommendation},\n author={Kang, SeongKu and Kweon, Wonbin and Lee, Dongha and Lian, Jianxun and Xie, Xing and Yu, Hwanjo},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023},\n pages={801--811},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{tang2018ranking,\n title={Ranking distillation: Learning compact ranking models with high performance for recommender system},\n author={Tang, Jiaxi and Wang, Ke},\n booktitle={SIGKDD},\n pages={2289--2298},\n year={2018}\n}\n\n@article{huang2024foundation,\n title={Foundation models for recommender systems: A survey and new perspectives},\n author={Huang, Chengkai and Yu, Tong and Xie, Kaige and Zhang, Shuai and Yao, Lina and McAuley, Julian},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.11143},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{hua2023index,\n title={How to index item ids for recommendation foundation models},\n author={Hua, Wenyue and Xu, Shuyuan and Ge, Yingqiang and Zhang, Yongfeng},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval in the Asia Pacific Region},\n pages={195--204},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{shin2023scaling,\n title={Scaling law for recommendation models: Towards general-purpose user representations},\n author={Shin, Kyuyong and Kwak, Hanock and Kim, Su Young and Ramstr{\\\"o}m, Max Nihl{\\'e}n and Jeong, Jisu and Ha, Jung-Woo and Kim, Kyung-Min},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},\n volume={37},\n number={4},\n pages={4596--4604},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{fang2024scaling,\n title={Scaling laws for dense retrieval},\n author={Fang, Yan and Zhan, Jingtao and Ai, Qingyao and Mao, Jiaxin and Su, Weihang and Chen, Jia and Liu, Yiqun},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval},\n pages={1339--1349},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@online{navon2024parameter,\n author = {Aviv Navon},\n title = {Parameter Sharing in Deep Learning},\n year = {2024},\n url = {https://avivnavon.github.io/blog/parameter-sharing-in-deep-learning/},\n note = {Accessed: 2024-11-18}\n}\n\n@article{rajput2023recommender,\n title={Recommender systems with generative retrieval},\n author={Rajput, Shashank and Mehta, Nikhil and Singh, Anima and Hulikal Keshavan, Raghunandan and Vu, Trung and Heldt, Lukasz and Hong, Lichan and Tay, Yi and Tran, Vinh and Samost, Jonah and others},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={36},\n pages={10299--10315},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{yang2025qwen3,\n title={Qwen3 technical report},\n author={Yang, An and Li, Anfeng and Yang, Baosong and Zhang, Beichen and Hui, Binyuan and Zheng, Bo and Yu, Bowen and Gao, Chang and Huang, Chengen and Lv, Chenxu and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{mcauley2015image,\n title={Image-based recommendations on styles and substitutes},\n author={McAuley, Julian and Targett, Christopher and Shi, Qinfeng and Van Den Hengel, Anton},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 38th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval},\n pages={43--52},\n year={2015}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{arthur2007kmeansplusplus,\n author = {David Arthur and Sergei Vassilvitskii},\n title = {k-means++: The Advantages of Careful Seeding},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA)},\n year = {2007},\n pages = {1027--1035}\n}\n\n@article{he2025plum,\n title={Plum: Adapting pre-trained language models for industrial-scale generative recommendations},\n author={He, Ruining and Heldt, Lukasz and Hong, Lichan and Keshavan, Raghunandan and Mao, Shifan and Mehta, Nikhil and Su, Zhengyang and Tsai, Alicia and Wang, Yueqi and Wang, Shao-Chuan and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.07784},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{zhou2025efficiency,\n title={The efficiency vs. accuracy trade-off: Optimizing rag-enhanced llm recommender systems using multi-head early exit},\n author={Zhou, Huixue and Gu, Hengrui and Zhan, Zaifu and Liu, Xi and Zhou, Kaixiong and Xiao, Yongkang and Liang, Mingfu and Govindan, Srinivas Prasad and Chawla, Piyush and Yang, Jiyan and others},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)},\n pages={26443--26458},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{wang2021dcn,\n title={Dcn v2: Improved deep \\& cross network and practical lessons for web-scale learning to rank systems},\n author={Wang, Ruoxi and Shivanna, Rakesh and Cheng, Derek and Jain, Sagar and Lin, Dong and Hong, Lichan and Chi, Ed},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the web conference 2021},\n pages={1785--1797},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhou2019deep,\n title={Deep interest evolution network for click-through rate prediction},\n author={Zhou, Guorui and Mou, Na and Fan, Ying and Pi, Qi and Bian, Weijie and Zhou, Chang and Zhu, Xiaoqiang and Gai, Kun},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence},\n volume={33},\n number={01},\n pages={5941--5948},\n year={2019}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2024wukong,\n title={Wukong: towards a scaling law for large-scale recommendation},\n author={Zhang, Buyun and Luo, Liang and Chen, Yuxin and Nie, Jade and Liu, Xi and Li, Shen and Zhao, Yanli and Hao, Yuchen and Yao, Yantao and Wen, Ellie Dingqiao and others},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning},\n pages={59421--59434},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{liang2025external,\n title={External large foundation model: How to efficiently serve trillions of parameters for online ads recommendation},\n author={Liang, Mingfu and Liu, Xi and Jin, Rong and Liu, Boyang and Suo, Qiuling and Zhou, Qinghai and Zhou, Song and Chen, Laming and Zheng, Hua and Li, Zhiyuan and others},\n booktitle={Companion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025},\n pages={344--353},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{lee2022autoregressive,\n title={Autoregressive image generation using residual quantization},\n author={Lee, Doyup and Kim, Chiheon and Kim, Saehoon and Cho, Minsu and Han, Wook-Shin},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition},\n pages={11523--11532},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n# Reasoning\n\n@article{wei2022chain,\n title={Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models},\n author={Wei, Jason and Wang, Xuezhi and Schuurmans, Dale and Bosma, Maarten and Xia, Fei and Chi, Ed and Le, Quoc V and Zhou, Denny and others},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={35},\n pages={24824--24837},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{wang2022self,\n title={Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models},\n author={Wang, Xuezhi and Wei, Jason and Schuurmans, Dale and Le, Quoc and Chi, Ed and Narang, Sharan and Chowdhery, Aakanksha and Zhou, Denny},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11171},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n\n@article{zhao2026self,\n title={Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models},\n author={Zhao, Siyan and Xie, Zhihui and Liu, Mengchen and Huang, Jing and Pang, Guan and Chen, Feiyu and Grover, Aditya},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.18734},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{lewkowycz2022solving,\n title={Solving quantitative reasoning problems with language models},\n author={Lewkowycz, Aitor and Andreassen, Anders and Dohan, David and Dyer, Ethan and Michalewski, Henryk and Ramasesh, Vinay and Slone, Ambrose and Anil, Cem and Schlag, Imanol and Gutman-Solo, Theo and others},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={35},\n pages={3843--3857},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{stiennon2020learning,\n title={Learning to summarize with human feedback},\n author={Stiennon, Nisan and Ouyang, Long and Wu, Jeffrey and Ziegler, Daniel and Lowe, Ryan and Voss, Chelsea and Radford, Alec and Amodei, Dario and Christiano, Paul F},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={33},\n pages={3008--3021},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@article{ouyang2022training,\n title={Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback},\n author={Ouyang, Long and Wu, Jeffrey and Jiang, Xu and Almeida, Diogo and Wainwright, Carroll and Mishkin, Pamela and Zhang, Chong and Agarwal, Sandhini and Slama, Katarina and Ray, Alex and others},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={35},\n pages={27730--27744},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{lightman2023let,\n title={Let's verify step by step},\n author={Lightman, Hunter and Kosaraju, Vineet and Burda, Yuri and Edwards, Harrison and Baker, Bowen and Lee, Teddy and Leike, Jan and Schulman, John and Sutskever, Ilya and Cobbe, Karl},\n booktitle={The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{\nxing2023toa,\ntitle={{TOA}: Task-oriented Active {VQA}},\nauthor={Xiaoying Xing and Mingfu Liang and Ying Wu},\nbooktitle={Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems},\nyear={2023},\nurl={https://openreview.net/forum?id=yoAmURKDJi}\n}\n\n@article{guo2025deepseek,\n title={Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning},\n author={Guo, Daya and Yang, Dejian and Zhang, Haowei and Song, Junxiao and Zhang, Ruoyu and Xu, Runxin and Zhu, Qihao and Ma, Shirong and Wang, Peiyi and Bi, Xiao and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{rafailov2023direct,\n title={Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model},\n author={Rafailov, Rafael and Sharma, Archit and Mitchell, Eric and Manning, Christopher D and Ermon, Stefano and Finn, Chelsea},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={36},\n pages={53728--53741},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{zhou2025onerec,\n title={Onerec-v2 technical report},\n author={Zhou, Guorui and Hu, Hengrui and Cheng, Hongtao and Wang, Huanjie and Deng, Jiaxin and Zhang, Jinghao and Cai, Kuo and Ren, Lejian and Ren, Lu and Yu, Liao and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.20900},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{zhou2025openonerec,\n title={OpenOneRec Technical Report},\n author={Zhou, Guorui and Bao, Honghui and Huang, Jiaming and Deng, Jiaxin and Zhang, Jinghao and She, Junda and Cai, Kuo and Ren, Lejian and Ren, Lu and Luo, Qiang and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.24762},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{ramanujam2025large,\n title={Large Scale Retrieval for the LinkedIn Feed using Causal Language Models},\n author={Ramanujam, Sudarshan Srinivasa and Alonso, Antonio and Kataria, Saurabh and Dangi, Siddharth and Gupta, Akhilesh and Tiwana, Birjodh Singh and Somaiya, Manas and Simon, Luke and Byrne, David and Ha, Sojeong and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14223},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{behdin2025scaling,\n title={Efficient AI in Practice: Training and Deployment of Efficient LLMs for Industry Applications},\n author={Behdin, Kayhan and Dai, Yun and Fatahibaarzi, Ata and Gupta, Aman and Song, Qingquan and Tang, Shao and Sang, Hejian and Dexter, Gregory and Zhu, Sirou and Zhu, Siyu and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14305},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{deng2025onerec,\n title={Onerec: Unifying retrieve and rank with generative recommender and iterative preference alignment},\n author={Deng, Jiaxin and Wang, Shiyao and Cai, Kuo and Ren, Lejian and Hu, Qigen and Ding, Weifeng and Luo, Qiang and Zhou, Guorui},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18965},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{luo2025meta,\n title={Meta Lattice: Model Space Redesign for Cost-Effective Industry-Scale Ads Recommendations},\n author={Luo, Liang and Chen, Yuxin and Zhang, Zhengyu and Hang, Mengyue and Gu, Andrew and Zhang, Buyun and Liu, Boyang and Chen, Chen and Fan, Chengze and Liang, Dong and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.09200},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2025reasonrec,\n title={Reasonrec: A reasoning-augmented multimodal agent for unified recommendation},\n author={Zhang, Yihua and Liu, Xi and Zeng, Xihuan and Liang, Mingfu and Yang, Jiyan and Jin, Rong and Chen, Wen-Yen and Han, Yiping and Ma, Hao and Long, Bo and others},\n booktitle={ICML 2025 Workshop on Programmatic Representations for Agent Learning},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{zhao2024recommender,\n title={Recommender systems in the era of large language models (llms)},\n author={Zhao, Zihuai and Fan, Wenqi and Li, Jiatong and Liu, Yunqing and Mei, Xiaowei and Wang, Yiqi and Wen, Zhen and Wang, Fei and Zhao, Xiangyu and Tang, Jiliang and others},\n journal={IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering},\n volume={36},\n number={11},\n pages={6889--6907},\n year={2024},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n\n@article{wu2024survey,\n title={A survey on large language models for recommendation},\n author={Wu, Likang and Zheng, Zhi and Qiu, Zhaopeng and Wang, Hao and Gu, Hongchao and Shen, Tingjia and Qin, Chuan and Zhu, Chen and Zhu, Hengshu and Liu, Qi and others},\n journal={World Wide Web},\n volume={27},\n number={5},\n pages={60},\n year={2024},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{gao2025llm4rerank,\n title={Llm4rerank: Llm-based auto-reranking framework for recommendations},\n author={Gao, Jingtong and Chen, Bo and Zhao, Xiangyu and Liu, Weiwen and Li, Xiangyang and Wang, Yichao and Wang, Wanyu and Guo, Huifeng and Tang, Ruiming},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025},\n pages={228--239},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{gao2024smlp4rec,\n title={Smlp4rec: An efficient all-mlp architecture for sequential recommendations},\n author={Gao, Jingtong and Zhao, Xiangyu and Li, Muyang and Zhao, Minghao and Wu, Runze and Guo, Ruocheng and Liu, Yiding and Yin, Dawei},\n journal={ACM Transactions on Information Systems},\n volume={42},\n number={3},\n pages={1--23},\n year={2024},\n publisher={ACM New York, NY}\n}\n@article{liuneural,\n title={Neural Re-ranking in Multi-stage Recommender Systems: A Review},\n booktitle={IJCAI 2022},\n author={Liu, Weiwen and Xi, Yunjia and Qin, Jiarui and Sun, Fei and Chen, Bo and Zhang, Weinan and Zhang, Rui and Tang, Ruiming}\n}\n\n\n\n@inproceedings{trivedi2023interleaving,\n title={Interleaving retrieval with chain-of-thought reasoning for knowledge-intensive multi-step questions},\n author={Trivedi, Harsh and Balasubramanian, Niranjan and Khot, Tushar and Sabharwal, Ashish},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 61st annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (volume 1: long papers)},\n pages={10014--10037},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{zhuang2025rank,\n title={Rank-r1: Enhancing reasoning in llm-based document rerankers via reinforcement learning},\n author={Zhuang, Shengyao and Ma, Xueguang and Koopman, Bevan and Lin, Jimmy and Zuccon, Guido},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06034},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{10.1145/3726302.3730070,\nauthor = {Ji, Yuelyu and Li, Zhuochun and Meng, Rui and He, Daqing},\ntitle = {Reason-to-Rank: Distilling Direct and Comparative Reasoning from Large Language Models for Document Reranking},\nyear = {2025},\nisbn = {9798400715921},\npublisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\naddress = {New York, NY, USA},\nurl = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3726302.3730070},\ndoi = {10.1145/3726302.3730070},\nabstract = {Reranking documents in information retrieval often relies on black-box models that improve effectiveness but lack explainability. We introduce Reason-to-Rank (R2R), a novel framework that separates direct relevance reasoning from comparison reasoning to provide both direct and comparitive explanations. We first prompt a large language model to produce comprehensive rationales and a ranking order; then we distill both the ranking decisions and textual explanations into a smaller, open-source student model. Our approach not only improves retrieval performance, as demonstrated in MSMARCO, BEIR, and BRIGHT, but also provides interpretable justifications for why one document outranks another. We report NDCG@5 (and NDCG@10) for direct comparisons with prior work, and show that the distilled student model achieves competitive results while significantly reducing computational overhead. By unifying direct and comparative reasoning in a single pipeline, R2R bridges the gap between transparency and effectiveness in modern reranking systems.},\nbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval},\npages = {2320–2329},\nnumpages = {10},\nkeywords = {information retrieval, large language models, re-ranking},\nlocation = {Padua, Italy},\nseries = {SIGIR '25}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{song-etal-2025-limrank,\n title = \"{L}im{R}ank: Less is More for Reasoning-Intensive Information Reranking\",\n author = \"Song, Tingyu and\n Zhao, Yilun and\n Zhang, Siyue and\n Zhao, Chen and\n Cohan, Arman\",\n editor = \"Christodoulopoulos, Christos and\n Chakraborty, Tanmoy and\n Rose, Carolyn and\n Peng, Violet\",\n booktitle = \"Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing\",\n month = nov,\n year = \"2025\",\n address = \"Suzhou, China\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computational Linguistics\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2025.emnlp-main.1041/\",\n doi = \"10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1041\",\n pages = \"20625--20639\",\n ISBN = \"979-8-89176-332-6\",\n abstract = \"Existing approaches typically rely on large-scale fine-tuning to adapt LLMs for information reranking tasks, which is computationally expensive. In this work, we demonstrate that modern LLMs can be effectively adapted using only minimal, high-quality supervision. To enable this, we design LIMRANK-SYNTHESIZER, a reusable and open-source pipeline for generating diverse, challenging, and realistic reranking examples. Using this synthetic data, we fine-tune our reranker model, LIMRANK. We evaluate LIMRANK on two challenging benchmarks, i.e., BRIGHT for reasoning-intensive retrieval and FollowIR for instruction-following retrieval. Our experiments demonstrate that LIMRANK achieves competitive performance, while being trained on less than 5{\\%} of the data typically used in prior work. Further ablation studies demonstrate the effectiveness of LIMRANK-SYNTHESIZER and the strong generalization capabilities of LIMRANK across downstream tasks, including scientific literature search and retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive problem solving.\"\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang-etal-2025-enhancing,\n title = \"Enhancing Reranking for Recommendation with {LLM}s through User Preference Retrieval\",\n author = \"Zhang, Haobo and\n Zhu, Qiannan and\n Dou, Zhicheng\",\n editor = \"Rambow, Owen and\n Wanner, Leo and\n Apidianaki, Marianna and\n Al-Khalifa, Hend and\n Eugenio, Barbara Di and\n Schockaert, Steven\",\n booktitle = \"Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics\",\n month = jan,\n year = \"2025\",\n address = \"Abu Dhabi, UAE\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computational Linguistics\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2025.coling-main.45/\",\n pages = \"658--671\",\n abstract = \"Recently, large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to enhance recommendations due to their sufficient knowledge and remarkable summarization ability. However, the existing LLM-powered recommendation may create redundant output, which generates irrelevant information about the user{'}s preferences on candidate items from user behavior sequences. To address the issues, we propose a framework UR4Rec that enhances reranking for recommendation with large language models through user preference retrieval. Specifically, UR4Rec develops a small transformer-based user preference retriever towards candidate items to build the bridge between LLMs and recommendation, which focuses on producing the essential knowledge through LLMs from user behavior sequences to enhance reranking for recommendation. Our experimental results on three real-world public datasets demonstrate the superiority of UR4Rec over existing baseline models.\"\n}\n\n@inproceedings{das2025rader,\n title={Rader: Reasoning-aware dense retrieval models},\n author={Das, Debrup and O’Nuallain, Sam and Rahimi, Razieh},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing},\n pages={19981--20008},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{li2025cot,\n title={Cot-rag: Integrating chain of thought and retrieval-augmented generation to enhance reasoning in large language models},\n author={Li, Feiyang and Fang, Peng and Shi, Zhan and Khan, Arijit and Wang, Fang and Feng, Dan and Wang, Weihao and Zhang, Xin and Cui, Yongjian},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13534},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{10.1145/3696410.3714922,\nauthor = {Gao, Jingtong and Chen, Bo and Zhao, Xiangyu and Liu, Weiwen and Li, Xiangyang and Wang, Yichao and Wang, Wanyu and Guo, Huifeng and Tang, Ruiming},\ntitle = {LLM4Rerank: LLM-based Auto-Reranking Framework for Recommendations},\nyear = {2025},\nisbn = {9798400712746},\npublisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\naddress = {New York, NY, USA},\nurl = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3696410.3714922},\ndoi = {10.1145/3696410.3714922},\nabstract = {Reranking is significant for recommender systems due to its pivotal role in refining recommendation results. Numerous reranking models have emerged to meet diverse reranking requirements in practical applications, which not only prioritize accuracy but also consider additional aspects such as diversity and fairness. However, most of the existing models struggle to strike a harmonious balance between these diverse aspects at the model level. Additionally, the scalability and personalization of these models are often limited by their complexity and a lack of attention to the varying importance of different aspects in diverse reranking scenarios. To address these issues, we propose LLM4Rerank, a comprehensive LLM-based reranking framework designed to bridge the gap between various reranking aspects while ensuring scalability and personalized performance. Specifically, we abstract different aspects into distinct nodes and construct a fully connected graph for LLM to automatically consider aspects like accuracy, diversity, fairness, and more, all in a coherent Chain-of-Thought (CoT) process. To further enhance personalization during reranking, we facilitate a customizable input mechanism that allows fine-tuning of LLM's focus on different aspects according to specific reranking needs. Experimental results on three widely used public datasets demonstrate that LLM4Rerank outperforms existing state-of-the-art reranking models across multiple aspects.},\nbooktitle = {Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025},\npages = {228–239},\nnumpages = {12},\nkeywords = {large language model, recommender system, reranking},\nlocation = {Sydney NSW, Australia},\nseries = {WWW '25}\n}\n\n@article{hong2025generative,\n title={Generative Reasoning Recommendation via LLMs},\n author={Hong, Minjie and Zhou, Zetong and Guo, Zirun and Zhang, Ziang and Hu, Ruofan and Gan, Weinan and Zhu, Jieming and Zhao, Zhou},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.20815},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{tsai-etal-2024-leveraging,\n title = \"Leveraging {LLM} Reasoning Enhances Personalized Recommender Systems\",\n author = \"Tsai, Alicia and\n Kraft, Adam and\n Jin, Long and\n Cai, Chenwei and\n Hosseini, Anahita and\n Xu, Taibai and\n Zhang, Zemin and\n Hong, Lichan and\n Chi, Ed H. and\n Yi, Xinyang\",\n editor = \"Ku, Lun-Wei and\n Martins, Andre and\n Srikumar, Vivek\",\n booktitle = \"Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024\",\n month = aug,\n year = \"2024\",\n address = \"Bangkok, Thailand\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computational Linguistics\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-acl.780/\",\n doi = \"10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.780\",\n pages = \"13176--13188\"\n}\n\n@inproceedings{sun-etal-2023-chatgpt,\n title = \"Is {C}hat{GPT} Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agents\",\n author = \"Sun, Weiwei and\n Yan, Lingyong and\n Ma, Xinyu and\n Wang, Shuaiqiang and\n Ren, Pengjie and\n Chen, Zhumin and\n Yin, Dawei and\n Ren, Zhaochun\",\n editor = \"Bouamor, Houda and\n Pino, Juan and\n Bali, Kalika\",\n booktitle = \"Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing\",\n month = dec,\n year = \"2023\",\n address = \"Singapore\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computational Linguistics\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2023.emnlp-main.923/\",\n doi = \"10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.923\",\n pages = \"14918--14937\",\n abstract = \"Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable zero-shot generalization across various language-related tasks, including search engines. However, existing work utilizes the generative ability of LLMs for Information Retrieval (IR) rather than direct passage ranking. The discrepancy between the pre-training objectives of LLMs and the ranking objective poses another challenge. In this paper, we first investigate generative LLMs such as ChatGPT and GPT-4 for relevance ranking in IR. Surprisingly, our experiments reveal that properly instructed LLMs can deliver competitive, even superior results to state-of-the-art supervised methods on popular IR benchmarks. Furthermore, to address concerns about data contamination of LLMs, we collect a new test set called NovelEval, based on the latest knowledge and aiming to verify the model{'}s ability to rank unknown knowledge. Finally, to improve efficiency in real-world applications, we delve into the potential for distilling the ranking capabilities of ChatGPT into small specialized models using a permutation distillation scheme. Our evaluation results turn out that a distilled 440M model outperforms a 3B supervised model on the BEIR benchmark. The code to reproduce our results is available at www.github.com/sunnweiwei/RankGPT.\"\n}\n\n@article{zeng2025optimizing,\n title={Optimizing Generative Ranking Relevance via Reinforcement Learning in Xiaohongshu Search},\n author={Zeng, Ziyang and Jing, Heming and Chen, Jindong and Li, Xiangli and Liu, Hongyu and He, Yixuan and Li, Zhengyu and Sun, Yige and Xie, Zheyong and Yang, Yuqing and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.00968},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{10.1145/3705728,\nauthor = {Luo, Sichun and He, Bowei and Zhao, Haohan and Shao, Wei and Qi, Yanlin and Huang, Yinya and Zhou, Aojun and Yao, Yuxuan and Li, Zongpeng and Xiao, Yuanzhang and Zhan, Mingjie and Song, Linqi},\ntitle = {RecRanker: Instruction Tuning Large Language Model as Ranker for Top-k Recommendation},\nyear = {2025},\nissue_date = {September 2025},\npublisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\naddress = {New York, NY, USA},\nvolume = {43},\nnumber = {5},\nissn = {1046-8188},\nurl = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3705728},\ndoi = {10.1145/3705728},\nabstract = {Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities and have been extensively deployed across various domains, including recommender systems. Prior research has employed specialized prompts to leverage the in-context learning capabilities of LLMs for recommendation purposes. More recent studies have utilized instruction tuning techniques to align LLMs with human preferences, promising more effective recommendations. However, existing methods suffer from several limitations. The full potential of LLMs is not fully elicited due to low-quality tuning data and the overlooked integration of conventional recommender signals. Furthermore, LLMs may generate inconsistent responses for different ranking tasks in the recommendation, potentially leading to unreliable results.In this article, we introduce Ranker for top-k Recommendations (RecRanker), tailored for instruction tuning LLMs to serve as the Ranker for top-k Recommendations. Specifically, we introduce importance-aware sampling, clustering-based sampling, and penalty for repetitive sampling for sampling high-quality, representative, and diverse training data. To enhance the prompt, we introduce a position shifting strategy to mitigate position bias and augment the prompt with auxiliary information from conventional recommendation models, thereby enriching the contextual understanding of the LLM. Subsequently, we utilize the sampled data to assemble an instruction-tuning dataset with the augmented prompts comprising three distinct ranking tasks: pointwise, pairwise, and listwise rankings. We further propose a hybrid ranking method to enhance the model performance by ensembling these ranking tasks. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed RecRanker in both direct and sequential recommendation scenarios.1},\njournal = {ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.},\nmonth = jul,\narticleno = {113},\nnumpages = {31},\nkeywords = {Recommender System, Large Language Model, Instruction Tuning, Ranking}\n}\n\n@article{yang2025rank,\n title={Rank-k: Test-time reasoning for listwise reranking},\n author={Yang, Eugene and Yates, Andrew and Ricci, Kathryn and Weller, Orion and Chari, Vivek and Van Durme, Benjamin and Lawrie, Dawn},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14432},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{zhao2025reason,\n title={Reason-to-Recommend: Using Interaction-of-Thought Reasoning to Enhance LLM Recommendation},\n author={Zhao, Keyu and Xu, Fengli and Li, Yong},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05069},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{qin2024large,\n title={Large language models are effective text rankers with pairwise ranking prompting},\n author={Qin, Zhen and Jagerman, Rolf and Hui, Kai and Zhuang, Honglei and Wu, Junru and Yan, Le and Shen, Jiaming and Liu, Tianqi and Liu, Jialu and Metzler, Donald and others},\n booktitle={Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024},\n pages={1504--1518},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{liu-etal-2025-rethinking,\n title = \"Rethinking the Role of Prompting Strategies in {LLM} Test-Time Scaling: A Perspective of Probability Theory\",\n author = \"Liu, Yexiang and\n Li, Zekun and\n Fang, Zhi and\n Xu, Nan and\n He, Ran and\n Tan, Tieniu\",\n editor = \"Che, Wanxiang and\n Nabende, Joyce and\n Shutova, Ekaterina and\n Pilehvar, Mohammad Taher\",\n booktitle = \"Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)\",\n month = jul,\n year = \"2025\",\n address = \"Vienna, Austria\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computational Linguistics\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.1356/\",\n doi = \"10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1356\",\n pages = \"27962--27994\",\n ISBN = \"979-8-89176-251-0\",\n abstract = \"Recently, scaling test-time compute on Large Language Models (LLM) has garnered wide attention. However, there has been limited investigation of how various reasoning prompting strategies perform as scaling. In this paper, we focus on a standard and realistic scaling setting: majority voting. We systematically conduct experiments on 6 LLMs $\\times$ 8 prompting strategies $\\times$ 6 benchmarks. Experiment results consistently show that as the sampling time and computational overhead increase, complicated prompting strategies with superior initial performance gradually fall behind simple Chain-of-Thought.We analyze this phenomenon and provide theoretical proofs. Additionally, we propose a probabilistic method to efficiently predict scaling performance and identify the best prompting strategy under large sampling times, eliminating the need for resource-intensive inference processes in practical applications.Furthermore, we introduce two ways derived from our theoretical analysis to significantly improve the scaling performance. We hope that our research can promote to re-examine the role of complicated prompting, unleash the potential of simple prompting strategies, and provide new insights for enhancing test-time scaling performance. Code is available at https://github.com/MraDonkey/rethinking{\\_}prompting.\"\n}\n\n@inproceedings{li2024large,\n title={Large language models for generative recommendation: A survey and visionary discussions},\n author={Li, Lei and Zhang, Yongfeng and Liu, Dugang and Chen, Li},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024)},\n pages={10146--10159},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{ma-etal-2024-xrec,\n title = \"{XR}ec: Large Language Models for Explainable Recommendation\",\n author = \"Ma, Qiyao and\n Ren, Xubin and\n Huang, Chao\",\n editor = \"Al-Onaizan, Yaser and\n Bansal, Mohit and\n Chen, Yun-Nung\",\n booktitle = \"Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024\",\n month = nov,\n year = \"2024\",\n address = \"Miami, Florida, USA\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computational Linguistics\",\n url = \"https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-emnlp.22/\",\n doi = \"10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.22\",\n pages = \"391--402\",\n abstract = \"Recommender systems help users navigate information overload by providing personalized recommendations aligned with their preferences. Collaborative Filtering (CF) is a widely adopted approach, but while advanced techniques like graph neural networks (GNNs) and self-supervised learning (SSL) have enhanced CF models for better user representations, they often lack the ability to provide explanations for the recommended items. Explainable recommendations aim to address this gap by offering transparency and insights into the recommendation decision-making process, enhancing users' understanding. This work leverages the language capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to push the boundaries of explainable recommender systems. We introduce a model-agnostic framework called XRec, which enables LLMs to provide comprehensive explanations for user behaviors in recommender systems. By integrating collaborative signals and designing a lightweight collaborative adaptor, the framework empowers LLMs to understand complex patterns in user-item interactions and gain a deeper understanding of user preferences. Our extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of XRec, showcasing its ability to generate comprehensive and meaningful explanations that outperform baseline approaches in explainable recommender systems.\"\n}\n\n@inproceedings{gu2025r,\n title={R 4ec: A reasoning, reflection, and refinement framework for recommendation systems},\n author={Gu, Hao and Zhong, Rui and Xia, Yu and Yang, Wei and Lu, Chi and Jiang, Peng and Gai, Kun},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems},\n pages={411--421},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{wang2025llm,\n title={LLM as Explainable Re-Ranker for Recommendation System},\n author={Wang, Yaqi and Sun, Haojia and Zhang, Shuting},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.03439},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n\n@misc{qwen3technicalreport,\n title={Qwen3 Technical Report}, \n author={Qwen Team},\n year={2025},\n eprint={2505.09388},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CL},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09388}, \n}\n\n@article{van2017neural,\n title={Neural discrete representation learning},\n author={Van Den Oord, Aaron and Vinyals, Oriol and others},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={30},\n year={2017}\n}\n\n================================================\nFILE: paper.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[]{fairmeta_gr2}\n% Option \"twocolumn\" available, but please prioritize single-column\n\n\\usepackage{multirow}\n\\usepackage{color}\n\\usepackage{colortbl}\n\\usepackage{mdframed}\n\\usepackage{caption}\n\\usepackage{subcaption}\n\\usepackage{algpseudocode}\n\\usepackage{algorithm}\n\\usepackage{amsthm}\n\\usepackage{amssymb}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{enumitem}\n\\usepackage{xspace}\n\\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}\n\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\newcommand{\\cmark}{\\checkmark}\n\\newcommand{\\xmark}{$\\times$}\n\n\\usepackage[most]{tcolorbox}\n\\usepackage{microtype} \n\n\\newcommand{\\approach}{GR2\\xspace}\n\n\n\\title{GR2 Technical Report}\n\n\\author[*]{Yufei Li}\n\\author[*]{Zaiwei Zhang}\n\\author[*]{Mingfu Liang}\n\\author[*]{Kavosh Asadi}\n\\author[]{Jay Xu}\n\\author[]{Jimmy Kim}\n\\author[]{Chongyang Bai}\n\\author[]{Jieyi Zhang}\n\\author[]{Hongye Xie}\n\\author[]{Prachi Agrawal}\n\\author[]{Dian Yu}\n\\author[]{Tianyi Chen}\n\\author[]{Jean-Pascal Billaud}\n\\author[]{Garret Buell}\n\\author[]{YK (Yongkang) Zhu}\n\\author[]{Sachin Patil}\n\\author[]{Brooke Bian}\n\\author[]{Zhou Fang}\n\\author[]{Kevin Huang}\n\\author[]{Shiva Sudanagunta}\n\\author[]{Yuzhen Huang}\n\\author[]{Emma Lu}\n\\author[]{Chris O'Brien}\n\\author[]{Yang Song}\n\\author[]{Lihong Li}\n\\author[]{Jacob Tao}\n\\author[]{Zhicheng Zhu}\n\\author[]{Chao Li}\n\\author[]{Gaoxiang Liu}\n\\author[]{Neil Wu}\n\\author[]{Li Han}\n\\author[]{Loki Chen}\n\\author[]{Ming Lei}\n\\author[]{Greg Rehm}\n\\author[]{Siyuan Song}\n\\author[]{Tianwei Zhang}\n\\author[]{Li Li}\n\\author[]{Ketan Singh}\n\\author[]{Yavuz Yetim}\n\\author[]{Ilyas Atishev}\n\\author[]{Satendra Gera}\n\\author[]{Ashkan Sadeghi}\n\\author[]{Rachel Yan}\n\\author[]{Nikko Mizutani}\n\\author[]{Shuaiwen Wang}\n\\author[]{Song Yang}\n\\author[]{Zhijing Li}\n\\author[]{Jiang Liu}\n\\author[]{Mengying Sun}\n\\author[]{Fei Tian}\n\\author[]{Xiaohan Wei}\n\\author[]{Chonglin Sun}\n\\author[]{Shuo Gu}\n\\author[]{Parish Aggarwal}\n\\author[]{Kaushik Rangadurai}\n\\author[]{Zhi Hua}\n\\author[]{Frank Shyu}\n\\author[]{Ruchit Sharma}\n\\author[]{Liyuan Li}\n\\author[]{Shike Mei}\n\\author[]{Wenlin Chen}\n\\author[]{Santanu Kolay}\n\\author[]{Ben Schulte}\n\\author[]{Deepak Chandra}\n\\author[]{Adam (Yang) Song}\n\\author[]{Sandeep Pandey}\n\\author[1]{Xi Liu}\n\\author[2]{Hamed Firooz}\n\\author[2]{Luke Simon}%\n% \\author[1]{Second Author}\n% \\author[1,\\dagger]{Third Author}\n% \\author[1,\\dagger]{Last Author}\n\n\\affiliation[]{Meta AI}\n% \\affiliation[2]{Second Affiliation}\n\n\\contribution[*]{Co-first author}\n\\contribution[1]{Project lead}\n\\contribution[2]{Direction lead}\n% \\contribution[\\dagger]{Joint last author}\n\n\\abstract{Industrial recommendation systems serve billions of users through a multi-stage funnel---retrieval, early-stage ranking, and re-ranking---where the final re-ranking step disproportionately shapes user engagement and downstream performance, particularly for carousel and grid display formats.\n Despite growing enthusiasm for Large Language Models (LLMs) in recommendation, three gaps hinder industrial adoption: (1) most efforts target retrieval and ranking, leaving re-ranking---the stage closest to the final user experience---largely underexplored; (2) LLMs are typically deployed zero-shot or via supervised fine-tuning, underutilizing the reasoning capabilities unlocked by reinforcement learning (RL) on verifiable rewards; (3) deployed catalogs index billions of items with non-semantic identifiers that lie outside any base-LLM vocabulary.\n We present \\approach (Generative Reasoning Re-Ranker), an end-to-end framework that combines (i)~mid-training on semantic IDs produced by a tokenizer with $\\geq$99\\% uniqueness, (ii)~reasoning-trace distilled from a stronger teacher via targeted prompting and rejection sampling, and (iii)~RL with verifiable rewards purpose-built for re-ranking.\n To make \\approach resource-viable, we further (iv) introduce a context compressor that amortizes training cost, On-Policy Distillation (OPD) as a scalable alternative to SFT---which we find collapses at industrial scale---and reasoning distillation for low-latency serving.\n \\approach delivers +18.7\\% R@1, +7.1\\% R@3, and +9.6\\% N@3 over legacy baselines on industrial-scale traffic.\n We further find that reward design is critical in re-ranking: LLMs often hack rewards by preserving the incoming order or exploiting position bias, motivating conditional verifiable rewards as essential industrial components.}\n\n% \\date{\\today}\n% \\correspondence{Yufei Li at \\email{liyufei@meta.com}}\n\n% % You can add additional metadata fields as follows \n% \\metadata[Code]{\\url{https://github.com/facebookresearch/repo}}\n% \\metadata[Blogpost]{\\url{https://ai.meta.com/blog/?page=1}}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\n\\section{Introduction}\n\\label{section:intro}\n\nRecommendation systems have become indispensable across modern online platforms, mitigating information overload by surfacing items aligned with users' interests\\citep{ramanujam2025large,behdin2025scaling,deng2025onerec}. Over the past decade, deep neural networks built on large embedding tables have dominated the modeling of user--item interactions~\\citep{liang2025external,luo2025meta,zhang2024wukong,zhang2022dhen,wang2021dcn, zhou2019deep}.\nMore recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a transformative paradigm for recommendation~\\citep{zhou2025efficiency,zhang2025reasonrec, zhao2024recommender,wu2024survey}, driven by their continual scaling gains, broad world knowledge, and contextual understanding. Representative efforts include P5~\\citep{geng2022recommendation}, which unifies diverse recommendation tasks within a single LLM model; OneRec-Think~\\citep{liu2025onerec}, which fuses retrieval and ranking stages via fine-tuned LLMs; and PLUM~\\citep{he2025plum} that adapts pre-trained LLMs for scalable retrieval at YouTube.\n\n\nWithin the multi-stage industrial funnel, the final \\emph{re-ranking} step disproportionately shapes what users see and interact with---most notably in carousel and grid layouts where top positions dominate engagement~\\citep{gao2025llm4rerank,gao2024smlp4rec,liuneural}. Despite this, LLM-based re-ranking remains underexplored: existing work concentrates on retrieval and early ranking, while industrial re-rankers still rely on point-wise CTR scoring without explicit reasoning over user intent or item semantics. Three concrete gaps block adoption at scale.\n\\textbf{(G1) Reasoning is left on the table.} LLMs are typically deployed zero-shot or supervised-fine-tuned on plain ranking labels, leaving the chain-of-thought capabilities most effectively elicited through reinforcement learning (RL) on verifiable rewards largely unused for re-ranking.\n\\textbf{(G2) Vocabulary mismatch.} Industrial catalogs index billions of items via non-semantic identifiers that lie outside any base-LLM vocabulary, breaking the model's ability to reason about candidates directly.\n\\textbf{(G3) Industrial-scale tax.} Naive recipes incur prohibitive training cost, low serving throughput from long thinking traces, and---as we show---reward hacking that inflates offline metrics without reflecting genuine ranking quality.\n\n\n\nTo close these gaps we introduce \\approach, the \\emph{Generative Reasoning Re-Ranker}. \\approach is built on a three-stage training pipeline (Figure~\\ref{fig:framework}) tailored to large-scale re-ranking. \\emph{First}, a pre-trained student LLM (e.g., Qwen3-8B~\\citep{qwen3technicalreport}) is mid-trained on semantic item IDs produced by a tokenizer that achieves $\\geq$99\\% uniqueness, allowing the model to recognize and generalize over the catalog without vocabulary blowup. \\emph{Second}, a stronger teacher (e.g., Qwen3-32B~\\citep{qwen3technicalreport}) is prompted with re-ranking-specific templates to generate hierarchical reasoning traces; targeted sampling or rejection sampling yields a curated SFT corpus that grounds the student's reasoning in user behavior and item semantics. \\emph{Third}, we adapt DAPO~\\citep{yu2025dapo} with a re-ranking-specific reward composed of a format term, an AUC/NDCG-based verifiable ranking term, and an optional LLM-as-a-judge reasoning term, providing scalable, reward-driven supervision.\nBridging this recipe to industry exposes failure modes that is often overlooked. Our contribution is to propose targeted solutions for each: a \\emph{context compressor} that cuts input length by ${>}80\\%$ while matching full-context quality, amortizing training cost; \\emph{On-Policy Distillation (OPD)} as a scalable replacement for SFT---naive SFT collapses at industrial scale, whereas a 1.7B OPD student recovers $\\approx$82\\% of a 32B teacher's gain at 5\\% of its size; \\emph{de-hacking conditional reward}, without which RL learns to preserve the incoming order or fail to generate valid output format; and \\emph{reasoning distillation} that internalizes chain-of-thought into a non-thinking policy, yielding ${\\sim}15\\times$ serving ROI at iso-quality.\n\n\nWe summarize our contributions as follows:\n\\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*,nosep]\n\\item \\textbf{Re-ranking-first LLM design.} Distinct from prior work that adapts LLMs for retrieval and early ranking, we establish design principles for LLM-based re-ranking and demonstrate that LLM world knowledge and reasoning translate into measurable ranking gains.\n\\item \\textbf{Semantic-ID mid-training.} A tokenization scheme that converts non-semantic item IDs into semantic IDs with $\\geq$99\\% uniqueness, combined with a mixed mid-training corpus of semantic IDs and world knowledge, enabling LLMs to reason over catalog items directly.\n\\item \\textbf{Reasoning activation pipeline.} Re-ranking-specific prompts paired with targeted and rejection sampling produce hierarchical reasoning traces; SFT (or OPD at industrial scale) on these curated traces installs a reasoning prior that pure RL cannot recover.\n\\item \\textbf{Verifiable-reward RL for re-ranking.} A re-ranking-tailored adaptation of DAPO with a multi-component reward; we identify and mitigate two reward-hacking modes (incoming-order preservation and position-bias exploitation) through conditional verifiable rewards and debiased training data.\n\\item \\textbf{Industrial adaptations.} A context compressor, OPD-based scalable distillation, and CoT distillation for non-thinking serving---each ablated to quantify its contribution to deployment feasibility.\n\\item \\textbf{Comprehensive evaluation.} \\approach improves over internal baselines on industrial traffic (+18.7\\% R@1, +9.6\\% N@3) and shows no decay over subsequent 9 days serving; ablations confirm that OPD supplies the reasoning prior and RL sharpens the ranking objective on top of it.\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\n\n\\begin{figure*}[htbp]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figure/gr2_overview.png}\n \\caption{Overview of the 4-stage training pipeline: student LLM mid-training on tokenized semantic IDs, reasoning data generation using teacher LLM via rejection sampling and on-policy distillation, student LLM reasoning enablement by RL, and serving ROI optimization.}\n \\label{fig:framework}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\n\n\\section{Tokenized Mid-Training}\\label{sec:stage_1}\nIn this section, we introduce the key components for attaining the LLM-based generative recommender: \\textbf{tokenization} and \\textbf{mid-training}. \n% To improve the cookbook utilization, we introduce our enhancement for the SID generation. \nTo obtain the generative retriever, we stemmed from the mid-training workflow from the advanced LLM-based generative retriever that perform multi-task training on an LLM.\n\n\\subsection{Tokenizer and Semantic ID (SID)}\n\nLearning the so-called semantic IDs (SIDs) has been widely adopted in recommendation systems to mitigate generalization issues pertaining to large embedding tables. \nThe seminal work, TIGER~\\citep{rajput2023recommender}, was the first to apply this technique to sequential recommendation. \nAt a high level, given the textual feature $x$ of an item, the tokenizer maps it to a sequence of discrete integers, i.e., a compact symbolic representation, defined as $\\text{Tokenizer}(x) = (z_1, z_2, \\ldots, z_K)$ where the final representation is a memeber of the set $\\{1,\\ldots,C_1\\}\\times \\cdot\\cdot\\cdot \\times \\{1,\\ldots,C_K\\}$,\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\boxed{\n% \\text{Tokenizer}(x) = (z_1, z_2, \\ldots, z_K),\n% \\quad z_k \\in \\{1,\\ldots,C_k\\}\n% }\n% \\end{equation}\nwhere $C_i$ is the cardinality of the $i$-th codebook. The core of the tokenizer is an (RQ-VAE)~\\citep{lee2022autoregressive}. The SID tokens are added to the vocabulary as special tokens.\nWe refer the reader to Sec 2 from our previous technical paper~\\citep{liang2026generative} for further details.\n\n\n\n\\subsection{Mid-Training via Multi-Task Learning}\n\\label{sec:item alignment}\n\nTIGER~\\citep{rajput2023recommender} trains an autoregressive model purely over Semantic ID sequences. In the era of LLMs, leveraging world knowledge encoded in pretrained LMs has become an important direction. \nTo this end, OneRec-Think~\\citep{liu2025onerec} developed by Kuaishou introduces a mid-training stage. Referred to as the `item alignment', this stage enables the LLM to align the recommendation knowledge and language (Semantic IDs) with the LLM's linguistic space and world knowledge. More concretely, the idea here is to \\emph{interleave Semantic IDs (SIDs) with natural language tokens within a single sequence} and to optimize the SID embedding table through the \\emph{next-token prediction objective}. \nThe mid-training tasks follows the same design from our previous technical paper~\\citep{liang2026generative}.\n\n\n\\section{Reasoning Enhancement}\\label{sec:stage_2}\nWe now present the design of reasoning enhancement for re-ranking. In Sec.\\ref{sec:chat_template}, we introduce a chat-format training-sample structure that grounds item representation in semantic IDs and enables chain-of-thought reasoning with structured JSON output. In Sec.\\ref{Reasoning Trace Generation}, we present two complementary strategies for generating high-quality reasoning traces, i.e., \\emph{targeted sampling}, which leverages ground-truth guidance, and \\emph{rejection sampling}, which ensures reasoning authenticity through iterative verification, together with five prompt-design principles that enable grounded, interpretable, and behaviorally-aware reasoning from large language models.\n\n\\subsection{Chat-formatted Template of Reasoning Data}\\label{sec:chat_template}\nWe construct training samples in a chat-format structure with three message roles. The design follows six principles:\n\\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*,nosep]\n \\item \\textbf{Role-based System Prompt.} The system message instantiates an analyst persona and specifies the re-ranking objective, activating domain reasoning without invoking purchase-intent or persuasion framing.\n % \\item \\textbf{SID-grounded Item Representation.} Both interaction-history items and candidate items are tagged with semantic-ID tokens (e.g., \\texttt{<|sid\\_begin|><s\\_a\\_57>\\ldots<|sid\\_end|>}), enabling the model to interleave SIDs with natural language during reasoning.\n \\item \\textbf{Rich Item Metadata.} Each item carries its title and category hierarchy, supporting both semantic and category-aware reasoning.\n \\item \\textbf{Unified Item Format.} History and candidates share the same structural format (SID + title + categories), ensuring consistent representation learning across input contexts.\n \\item \\textbf{Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Trace.} The assistant response contains step-by-step reasoning that explicitly cites items by their SIDs, producing grounded, verifiable traces.\n \\item \\textbf{Structured JSON Output.} The response is a JSON object containing the reasoning explanation and the ranked list, enabling deterministic parsing and evaluation.\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\n\n\\subsection{Reasoning Trace Generation}\n\\label{Reasoning Trace Generation}\n\nTo generate high-quality reasoning trace, we consider two generation strategies for the reasoning trace: \\emph{targeted sampling} and \\emph{rejection sampling}.\n\n\\paragraph{Targeted Sampling.}\nIn the targeted approach, we provide the target item $\\mathbf{s}_{v_{n+1}}$ and most recent $k$ historical items, then query a larger LLM to generate a reasoning trace $\\tau$ explaining the target interaction:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\tau \\sim P_\\theta(\\cdot | \\mathcal{P}_{\\text{targeted}} ([\\mathbf{s}_{v_1},...,\\mathbf{s}_{v_k}], [\\mathbf{s}_{y_1},...,\\mathbf{s}_{y_c}], \\mathbf{s}_{v_{n+1}})),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mathcal{P}_{\\text{targeted}}(x, y, z)$ constructs a prompt to query the rationale for why a user who interacts with item sequence $x$ would be most interested in $z$ from candidate list $y$. \nAs the ground truth is involved, the targeted approach always yields rationales for why the target might be favored by the user. Notice that this requires having ground truth in the prompt. \n\n\\paragraph{Rejection Sampling.}\nIn sharp contrast to targeted sampling, in rejection sampling we do not provide the ground truth. Instead we repeatedly query the LLM to predict which item $\\mathbf{\\hat{s}}_{y_c}$ among the pre-ranked candidates is most likely to be the user's next interest, until the prediction matches the ground-truth target:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{split}\n(\\tau, \\hat{\\mathbf{s}}_{y_c}) \\;\\sim\\;& P_\\theta\\!\\left(\\cdot \\,\\middle|\\, \\mathcal{P}_{\\text{rejection}}\\!\\bigl([\\mathbf{s}_{v_1},\\ldots,\\mathbf{s}_{v_k}],\\,[\\mathbf{s}_{y_1},\\ldots,\\mathbf{s}_{y_c}]\\bigr)\\right) \\\\\n& \\text{s.t.}\\quad \\hat{\\mathbf{s}}_{y_c} = \\mathbf{s}_{v_{n+1}}.\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mathcal{P}_{\\text{rejection}}(x,y)$ constructs a prompt to query which item in candidate list $y$ is most likely to be the user's next interest, given history $x$.\n\nTo generate high quality reasoning trace for re-ranking, we leverage following principles to design the prompt for instructing LLM for reasoning:\n\\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*,nosep]\n \\item \\textbf{Concrete System Role and Re-ranking Task definition}: To incentivize re-ranking capabilities, we elucidate the recommendation domain, the dedicated roles for the LLM to display, and the concrete definition of the re-ranking task.\n \\item \\textbf{Collaborative Context Presentation}: To provide comprehensive decision context, we present both the user's engagement history (with structured metadata including titles and categories) and the complete candidate set, enabling the model to perform holistic comparison rather than isolated item evaluation.\n \\item \\textbf{Domain Knowledge Priming}: To leverage sequential engagement patterns inherent in e-commerce (e.g., shampoo $\\rightarrow$ conditioner $\\rightarrow$ styling products), we explicitly prompt the model to consider such domain-specific heuristics, enabling it to apply common-sense reasoning about product complementarity and routine-based purchasing behavior.\n \\item \\textbf{Critical Guidelines as Output Constraint}: To ensure reasoning traces are grounded and verifiable, we impose explicit constraints such as requiring the model to cite items by their SIDs. This forces the model to anchor its reasoning in specific historical items rather than generating hallucinated justifications, enabling direct traceability between reasoning steps and context.\n \\item \\textbf{Structured Multi-Step Reasoning Format}: To elicit progressive and interpretable reasoning, we provide an explicit step-by-step output format with examples. This hierarchical structure guides the model through: (1) broad pattern recognition, (2) identifying complementary product types, and (3) matching to specific candidates, mirroring human decision-making processes.\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\n\\subsection{Supervised Fine-tuning on Reasoning Traces}\n\\label{sec:sft_formulation}\n\n\n\\paragraph{Problem Setup and Prompt Interface}\nGiven a user engagement history and a pre-ranked list of candidate items produced by a previous stage, our desire is to re-rank the candidates so as to promote the ground-truth next item.\nEach training or inference instance is formatted as a chat prompt consisting of three roles:\n\\texttt{system}, \\texttt{user}, and \\texttt{assistant}. \n% We follow the same role semantics as defined in Section~\\ref{sec:stage_2}.\nDuring supervised fine-tuning (SFT), the model is trained to generate the full assistant message.\nDuring reinforcement learning (RL), the policy conditions only on the system and user messages, and the assistant output is treated as the action.\n\n\nRecommender models often struggle to generate effective CoT reasoning from noisy and lengthy real-world user behavior sequences~\\citep{liu2025onerec}. The generated reasoning traces are used to supervise a base LLM to acquire reasoning capability for re-ranking. We fine-tune the model to generate both the reasoning trace $\\tau = [r_1, \\ldots, r_M]$ and the ranked output $\\mathbf{o} = [o_1, \\ldots, o_T]$.\n\nTo preserve ranking performance while enabling reasoning, we decouple the losses for reasoning and ranking tokens. Specifically, we apply the language modeling loss \\emph{only to the assistant message}, with separate weights for reasoning and ranking segments:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\mathcal{L}_{\\text{SFT}} =\n- \\lambda_r \\sum_{i=1}^{M}\n\\log P(r_i \\mid \\mathcal{P}, r_{<i})\n- \\lambda_o \\sum_{j=1}^{T}\n\\log P(o_j \\mid \\mathcal{P}, \\tau, o_{<j}),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\lambda_r < \\lambda_o$ balances reasoning fluency and ranking accuracy. This training procedure teaches the model to generate grounded, coherent reasoning traces that connect user history with candidate comparisons, while maintaining strong re-ranking behavior.\n\n\\subsection{OPD for Reasoning Activation}\n\\label{sec:method_distill}\nWe use \\emph{on-policy distillation} (OPD)~\\citep{zhao2026self} to transfer reasoning from a frozen teacher into the deployed student. A GRPO-style loop treats the student as the trainable actor and the teacher as the reference policy: at every step the student samples reasoning chains and ranked lists from its own distribution $\\pi_\\theta$, each rollout receives the reward of Section~\\ref{sec:stage_3}, and the actor is updated with a clipped surrogate plus a per-token reverse-KL anchor to the teacher,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{aligned}\n\\mathcal{L}_{\\mathrm{OPD}}(\\theta)\n={}& -\\mathbb{E}\\!\\left[\\min\\!\\bigl(\\rho_t \\hat A_t,\\;\\mathrm{clip}(\\rho_t,1{-}\\epsilon_{\\mathrm{lo}},1{+}\\epsilon_{\\mathrm{hi}})\\hat A_t\\bigr)\\right] \\\\\n& {}+ \\beta\\,\\mathbb{KL}\\!\\bigl[\\pi_{\\theta}(\\cdot\\!\\mid\\! s_t)\\,\\|\\,\\pi_{\\mathrm{T}}(\\cdot\\!\\mid\\! s_t)\\bigr],\n\\end{aligned}\n\\label{eq:opd}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\rho_t$ is the per-token importance ratio, $\\hat A_t$ the group-relative advantage, and $\\beta$ the distillation strength. The teacher contributes only token log-probabilities, never labels, acting as a distributional anchor while gradients flow through the student.\n\n\\paragraph{Why on-policy beats off-policy CoT supervision.}\nThe two CoT-SFT baselines introduced earlier in Section~\\ref{sec:sft_formulation} both reduce\nreasoning transfer to behavior cloning on a static, teacher-defined corpus, and inherit the standard pathologies of teacher-forced sequence learning: the student is supervised on states it will never visit at deployment, producing a train/inference distribution mismatch that compounds along the generated chain. Each method also adds its own bias on top of this. Targeted sampling conditions the teacher on the answer, so the resulting traces tend to encode post-hoc, label-aware shortcuts that the student memorizes as fluent but non-causal reasoning. Rejection sampling, by contrast, silently discards every prompt on which the teacher cannot meet the AUC bar within the sampling budget, which both wastes teacher compute and removes precisely the hardest examples—where supervision is most needed—from the training set. OPD avoids both failure modes by construction: the gradient is computed on trajectories the student itself samples, every prompt contributes a continuous reward signal regardless of how easy or hard it is for the teacher, and the teacher's role is reduced from generating the target trace to regularizing the student's own distribution. This combination\nof on-policy exposure, dense per-rollout reward, and per-token KL anchoring is what allows the small student to absorb the teacher's reasoning competence without inheriting its trace-style mismatch.\n\n\\section{RL Post-Training}\\label{sec:stage_3}\n\n\n\n\nWhile SFT enables coherent reasoning, it does not directly optimize the re-ranking objective. Building on the distilled reasoning capability of Sec.~\\ref{sec:sft_formulation}, we apply RL to refine both the reasoning process and the final ranking quality. Given a prompt $\\mathcal{P}(\\mathcal{H},\\mathcal{D})$, the policy $\\pi_\\theta$ generates an output $o=(\\tau,\\mathbf{o})$; during RL the policy conditions only on the system and user messages and $o$ is treated as the action. Unlike public benchmarks, where each impression has a single positive next item, industrial slates are \\emph{multi-positive}: a candidate list may carry several engagement labels at once. We therefore replace the single-target rank-delta of prior work with reward functions that score the whole permutation against a multi-label ground truth.\n\n\\subsection{Ranking Reward}\\label{sec:rank_reward}\nA candidate slate $\\mathcal{D}=\\{c_1,\\ldots,c_K\\}$ is associated with a binary engagement label vector $\\mathbf{y}\\in\\{0,1\\}^K$ that may contain multiple ones. We adopt the per-impression AUC of the predicted permutation $\\pi$ against $\\mathbf{y}$ as the primary ranking signal:\n\\begin{equation}\nR_{\\text{AUC}}(\\pi,\\mathbf{y}) \\;=\\; \\frac{1}{|\\mathcal{M}||\\mathcal{N}|}\\sum_{i\\in\\mathcal{M}}\\sum_{j\\in\\mathcal{N}}\\mathbf{1}\\!\\left[\\mathrm{rank}_\\pi(i)<\\mathrm{rank}_\\pi(j)\\right],\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mathcal{M}=\\{i|y_i{=}1\\}$ and $\\mathcal{N}=\\{j|y_j{=}0\\}$. AUC handles multiple positives natively, is bounded in $[0,1]$, and is permutation-invariant within each label class, providing a stable RL signal.\n\nWhen richer post-engagement signals are available, we further incorporate a graded-relevance \\emph{NDCG} term using a three-level label $g_i\\in\\{0,1,2\\}$ for $\\{\\text{no engagement},\\text{ click},\\text{ click}+\\text{conversion}\\}$:\n\\begin{equation}\nR_{\\text{NDCG}}(\\pi,\\mathbf{g}) \\;=\\; \\frac{1}{Z}\\sum_{i=1}^{K}\\frac{2^{g_{\\pi^{-1}(i)}}-1}{\\log_2(i+1)},\n\\end{equation}\nwith $Z$ the ideal DCG. The combined ranking reward is $R_{\\text{rank}}=R_{\\text{AUC}}~\\text{or}~R_{\\text{NDCG}}$ in our internal-data setup. Slates with no positives or no negatives ($|\\mathcal{P}|=0$ or $|\\mathcal{N}|=0$) are filtered at data-loading.\n\n\\subsection{Conditional Format Reward}\\label{sec:fmt_reward}\nTo ensure parseable outputs, we add a format reward $R_{\\text{fmt}}=\\Omega(o)$ that checks whether (i) the reasoning trace $\\tau$ and ranking output $\\mathbf{o}$ can be reliably parsed, and (ii) the parsed ranking is a valid permutation of $\\{1,\\ldots,K\\}$ matching the slate size. Naively combining $R_{\\text{rank}}$ and $R_{\\text{fmt}}$ exposes the policy to two reward-hacking pathways. First, an invalid permutation could still earn a non-trivial $R_{\\text{rank}}$ from a partial parse; we therefore gate $R_{\\text{rank}}$ on $\\Omega(o)=1$. Second, when the upstream slate is itself non-trivially ordered---i.e., the identity permutation already attains $R_{\\text{rank}}<1$---the policy can harvest format reward by emitting $[1,2,\\ldots,K]$ without performing any re-ranking, riding on whatever AUC the input order already supplies. We detect this \\emph{identity-permutation cheating} and zero out $R_{\\text{rank}}$ when the model output equals the input order \\emph{and} the input order is suboptimal:\n\\begin{equation}\nR =\n\\begin{cases}\nR_{\\text{rank}} + \\alpha R_{\\text{fmt}}, & \\pi\\neq[1,\\ldots,K]\\ \\text{or}\\ R_{\\text{AUC}}([1,\\ldots,K],\\mathbf{y})=1,\\\\\n\\alpha R_{\\text{fmt}}, & \\pi=[1,\\ldots,K]\\ \\text{and}\\ R_{\\text{AUC}}([1,\\ldots,K],\\mathbf{y})<1,\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\alpha$ is the format-reward weight. When the upstream slate is already optimal, the identity permutation is the genuinely correct answer and reward flows normally.\n\n\n\n\n\\subsection{Training via DAPO}\n\nWe optimize the policy using Decoupled Clip and Dynamic sAmpling Policy Optimization (DAPO) algorithm~\\citep{yu2025dapo}, a recently state-of-the-art RL algorithm developed upon Grouped Policy Optimization\n(GRPO)~\\citep{shao2024deepseekmath}. \nIt can effectively resolve the entropy collapse phenomenon and rollout length bias identified in the GRPO training process. For each prompt, we sample a group of $G$ outputs\n$\\{o_i\\}_{i=1}^G$\nand optimize:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{aligned}\n\\mathcal{J}_{\\text{DAPO}}(\\theta) = \\ &\\mathbb{E}_{(q,a)\\sim\\mathcal{D},\\,\\{o_i\\}_{i=1}^G \\sim \\pi_{\\theta_{\\text{old}}}(\\cdot|q)} \\\\\n&\\Bigg[ \\frac{1}{\\sum_{i=1}^G |o_i|} \\sum_{i=1}^G \\sum_{t=1}^{|o_i|} \\min\\Big( r_{i,t}(\\theta)\\,\\hat{A}_{i,t}, \\\\\n&\\qquad \\text{clip}\\big(r_{i,t}(\\theta),\\, 1-\\varepsilon_{\\text{low}},\\, 1+\\varepsilon_{\\text{high}}\\big)\\,\\hat{A}_{i,t} \\Big) \\Bigg],\n\\end{aligned}\n\\label{eq:dapo}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere\n\\begin{equation}\nr_{i,t}(\\theta) = \\frac{\\pi_\\theta(o_{i,t} | q, o_{i,<t})}{\\pi_{\\theta_{\\text{old}}}(o_{i,t} | q, o_{i,<t})}, \\quad \\hat{A}_{i,t} = \\frac{R_i - \\text{mean}(\\{R_i\\}_{i=1}^G)}{\\text{std}(\\{R_i\\}_{i=1}^G)}.\n\\label{eq:9}\n\\end{equation}\n$\\pi_\\theta$ and $\\pi_{\\theta_{\\text{old}}}$ denote the current and previous policies, respectively. \nThe pair $(q,D)\\sim\\mathcal{D}$ is sampled from the training distribution. The advantage estimate $\\hat{A}_{i,t}$ is computed for each output sequence $o_i$ and normalized within the group $G$. \nAdhering to the Clip-Higher strategy, DAPO decouples the lower and higher clipping range as $\\varepsilon_{\\text{low}}$ and $\\varepsilon_{\\text{high}})$. \nAdditionally, to avoid zero policy gradients (advantages) and improve sample efficiency, it oversamples and filters out prompts with the accuracy equal to 1 and 0.\n\n\n\\section{Serving ROI Optimization}\n\n\n\nThe first three stages yield a capable but expensive reasoning ranker:\nmid-training adapts the model to RecSys inputs and compresses prompts via\nsemantic IDs (\\S\\ref{sec:stage_1}), reasoning enablement instills a reasoning\nprior (\\S\\ref{sec:stage_2}), and RL post-training sharpens ranking behavior\nunder that prior (\\S\\ref{sec:stage_3}). The final stage preserves these ROI\ngains while slashing serving cost along its two dominant axes: the\n\\emph{input cost} of prompting over an $O(B)$ item catalog, and the\n\\emph{decode cost} of generating a chain-of-thought (CoT) per request. We\naddress them with two complementary levers---input-side context compression\nand decode-side reasoning internalization---delivering higher throughput and\nlower latency without sacrificing ranking quality.\n\n\\subsection{Input-Side: Context Compression}\n\nMid-training over an $O(B)$ item catalog requires generating large volumes of\nSID-aligned data and incurs heavy GPU cost per iteration, which slows online\nexperimentation. As a faster alternative for cutting input cost, we train a\n\\emph{context compressor} that shrinks the input before it reaches the ranker.\n\nThe compressor is trained with GRPO using an LLM-as-a-judge that scores each\ncompressed output along three axes: \\textit{solvability} $s\\!\\in\\!\\{0,1\\}$,\n\\textit{information preservation} $p\\!\\in\\!\\{1,\\ldots,10\\}$, and\n\\textit{ranking quality} $q\\!\\in\\!\\{1,\\ldots,10\\}$. The judge prompt is\nmode-aware (item-level vs.\\ free-form summary). The reward combines a\ncontinuous compression term with a solvability-conditioned judge term:\n\\begin{equation}\n r_{\\text{judge}} =\n \\begin{cases}\n 0.2\\,\\bar{p} + 0.8\\,\\bar{q} & s = 1 \\\\\n 0.8\\,\\bar{p} + 0.2\\,\\bar{q} & \\text{otherwise}\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\n\\begin{equation}\n r = \\bigl(\\alpha\\, r_{\\text{comp}} + (1{-}\\alpha)\\, r_{\\text{judge}}\\bigr) \\cdot \\lambda_{\\text{ellipsis}},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\bar{p}=p/10$, $\\bar{q}=q/10$,\n$r_{\\text{comp}}=\\max(0,\\,1-|\\text{compressed}|/|\\text{original}|)$, $\\alpha$\ntrades off compression against quality, and\n$\\lambda_{\\text{ellipsis}}\\!\\in\\![0,1]$ penalizes truncation shortcuts. When\nthe task is solvable we weight ranking signal over raw information\ncompleteness, since we find preservation correlates weakly with downstream\nranking while higher compression can suppress noise.\n\n\\subsection{Decode-Side: Internalizing Reasoning for Efficient Serving}\n\nGenerating a full CoT per request is the dominant \\emph{decode} cost of GR2.\nTo preserve the reasoning gains under large-scale serving latency, we run a\nsecond RL pass on the RL post-training checkpoint (\\S\\ref{sec:stage_3}) with\nexplicit reasoning bypassed: the policy is trained to emit only the structured\nranked output, conditioned directly on the system and user prompts. Because\nthe reasoning prior---instilled via OPD during reasoning enablement\n(\\S\\ref{sec:stage_2}) and sharpened by RL (\\S\\ref{sec:stage_3})---is already\nencoded in the shared backbone, it transfers to the direct-output policy\nwithout incurring CoT generation cost. This reasoning-free variant is the\ndeployed artifact; the CoT-enabled model is retained offline for evaluation\nand reward design.\n\n\n\\subsection{Systems-Level Optimizations: Pruning and KV Caching}\n\nThe above levers reduce token counts; two systems-level techniques further cut\nthe cost per token. \\emph{Model pruning} shrinks the served network via\ndepth-wise (layer) pruning followed by redistillation to recover quality,\nlowering compute across both prefill and decode. \\emph{KV caching} exploits the\nstructure of RecSys prompts: the candidate set for a request is fixed and\nlargely shared across users, so we precompute its key--value representations\nonce and reuse them across requests, ordering the prompt as system prompt,\ncandidates, then user context so the candidate KV remains reusable. Together\nthese amortize compute over the stable parts of the input and the reduced\nmodel, compounding the savings from compression and reasoning internalization.\n\n\n\\section{Experiments}\\label{sec:exp}\n\\label{experiments}\n\n\nWe focus this section on the industrial setting and answer the following research questions:\n\n\\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*,nosep]\n \\item \\textbf{Q1}: Does GR2 outperform the point-wise lagacy baseline, and is the gain robust to test-set scale, traffic freshness, and student model size?\n \\item \\textbf{Q2}: How do different reasoning-activation strategies (SFT, OPD) and RL post-training affect re-ranking quality at industrial scale?\n \\item \\textbf{Q3}: Can the enterprise-scale adaptations---context compression, OPD-based distillation, and implicit-CoT serving---preserve ranking quality under industrial latency and GPU budgets?\n\\end{itemize}\n\nPublic-benchmark results, the semantic-ID tokenizer design, and the codebook/uniqueness study are reported in a prior technical paper~\\cite{liang2026generative}; here we concentrate on the industrial setting, where adaptation challenges dominate.\n\n\\subsection{Experiment Setup}\n\n\\subsubsection{\\textbf{Datasets}}\n\\label{sec:datasets}\n\n\nGR2 is trained on a single day (\\texttt{01-25}) of internal logs containing roughly 70k user sessions and evaluated on held-out sessions from \\texttt{02-01} through \\texttt{02-09}.\nEach training example corresponds to one impression list paired with the user's historical feedback (e.g., clicked products). We apply standard industrial filtering to drop duplicated logging events and users with fewer than three interactions in the observation window.\nTo stress-test generalization, the test split is constructed so that user identifiers and interacted products rarely overlap with training: $>$99\\% of candidate products, 100\\% of user IDs, and 93\\% of user-history items are unseen during training. User histories are aggregated up to day~$-2$ relative to the impression to prevent label leakage.\nUnless noted otherwise, we report relative gains over the point-wise legacy baseline, which is online-trained with snapshot refresh every 60--90 minutes.\n\n\n\n\\subsubsection{\\textbf{Metrics}}\n\\label{sec:metrics}\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.75\\linewidth]{figure/gr2_main_results.png}\n \\caption{Re-ranking performance comparison with legacy baseline on industrial traffic across 70k sessions.}\n \\label{fig:main_results}\n\\end{figure}\n\nWe report standard sequential-recommendation metrics, \\emph{Recall@K} and \\emph{Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain at K (NDCG@K)}, computed over held-out impression lists.\n\n\n\n\\subsection{Main Results}\n\\label{sec:main_results}\n\n\\paragraph{GR2 substantially outperforms the legacy baseline (Fig.~\\ref{fig:main_results}).}\nOn the internal test set, GR2 delivers \\textbf{+18.7\\% R@1} and \\textbf{+7.1\\% R@3} over a heavily-tuned legacy baseline, despite being trained on a single day of logs.\nSince the GR2 checkpoint is roughly two weeks stale relative to the test window while the baseline is refreshed hourly, the lift cannot be attributed to data freshness; it reflects a genuine improvement in ranking quality driven by reasoning over product semantics.\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.75\\linewidth]{figure/gr2_test_scaling.png}\n \\caption{Relative performance gain across different testing data scales (regarding the training data size).}\n \\label{fig:test_size_scaling}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\paragraph{The lift is preserved at industrial scale (Fig.~\\ref{fig:test_size_scaling}).}\nHolding training data fixed at 70k sessions, we sweep test-set size from $0.14\\times$ through $1.4\\times$ up to $100\\times$ training data size.\nRelative R@K and N@K gains remain essentially constant across all three scales, indicating that GR2's improvement is not an artifact of small-sample evaluation and transfers to traffic volumes seen in industrial serving.\n\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.75\\linewidth]{figure/gr2_test_by_days.png}\n \\caption{Relative performance gain tested on 9 consecutive days of traffic after 2 weeks training.}\n \\label{fig:freshness}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\paragraph{Gains do not decay under model staleness (Fig.~\\ref{fig:freshness}).}\nEvaluated daily for nine consecutive days starting \\texttt{02-01}, the relative lift over the legacy baseline shows no measurable decay even though the GR2 checkpoint is more than two weeks stale by the end of the window.\nThis is striking given the cold-start setting described above (Section~\\ref{sec:datasets}): nearly every user and product at test time is novel, yet GR2 generalizes without retraining.\nWe attribute this robustness to GR2's reliance on LLM world knowledge and reasoning rather than memorized sparse IDs, which is precisely what forces the legacy baseline to refresh every 60--90 minutes to avoid distribution drift.\nWe expect this gap to widen on lower-funnel signals (delayed conversions), where sparse-ID models are further disadvantaged by feedback delay and label sparsity.\n\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.75\\linewidth]{figure/gr2_model_scaling.png}\n \\caption{Relative R@3 gain for various Qwen3 model sizes.}\n \\label{fig:model_scaling}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\paragraph{Performance scales with model size (Fig.~\\ref{fig:model_scaling}).}\nSweeping over Qwen-3 from 1.7B to 32B parameters, we observe R@3 lift grows monotonically with model size, demonstrating that GR2 inherits the LLM scaling law in the ads re-ranking domain.\nThis stands in contrast to sparse-ID baseline models, whose scaling is bounded by ID-vocabulary capacity rather than parameter count.\nThe current curve has not yet flattened despite our $\\sim$10-GPU budget, suggesting potential headroom; we discuss how on-policy distillation (Section~\\ref{sec:method_distill}) closes the resulting serving-cost gap.\n\n\n\\subsection{Serving Latency and Distillation}\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.8\\linewidth]{figure/gr2_opd_roi.png}\n \\caption{On-policy Distillation (OPD) can significantly improve Serving ROI. ZS denotes zeroshot.}\n \\label{fig:opd_roi}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\paragraph{Serving ROI via On-Policy Distillation (Fig.~\\ref{fig:opd_roi})}\nOur default GR2 recipe, denoted \\textbf{RL-OPD}, first applies OPD to bootstrap reasoning without the catastrophic forgetting we observe with token-level SFT, then runs RL post-training on the OPD checkpoint to sharpen ranking quality while preserving the reasoning prior.\nA 1.7B student distilled from a 32B teacher (5\\% of teacher size) recovers \\textbf{82\\%} of the 32B's gain over the baseline baseline and delivers \\textbf{2.6$\\times$} the gain of an 8B model trained without distillation, yielding a $\\sim$\\textbf{15$\\times$} serving-ROI boost ($32/1.7 \\times 0.82$) at iso-quality.\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.75\\linewidth]{figure/rec_sys_compressor.png}\n \\caption{Performance Comparison between Full Context vs Compressed Context (80\\% fewer tokens).}\n \\label{fig:compressor}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\paragraph{Context Compression (Fig.~\\ref{fig:compressor})} \nBoth RL-OPD variants improve substantially over the zero-shot 0.6B baseline (\\textbf{+10--12\\%} R@1, \\textbf{+4--6\\%} R@5/N@5). The compressed-context variant matches or slightly surpasses the full-context counterpart at R@3/N@3 (\\textbf{+7.71\\%} vs.\\ \\textbf{+7.14\\%}; \\textbf{+8.16\\%} vs.\\ \\textbf{+7.98\\%}) while consuming \\textbf{$<$20\\%} of the tokens---an additional \\textbf{$>$5$\\times$} context reduction at iso-quality. We attribute this to the solvability-conditioned reward: when $s{=}1$, the compressor is pushed toward ranking quality $\\bar{q}$ rather than literal preservation $\\bar{p}$, learning to discard ranking-irrelevant signal. This confirms our hypothesis that information preservation correlates only weakly with ranking utility, and that aggressive ranking-aware compression acts as a denoiser.\n\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figure/rec_sys_internal.png}\n \\caption{Recall and NDCG across RL-OPD with CoT (explicit reasoning traces), without CoT, and after a second RL pass that internalizes reasoning.}\n \\label{fig:internal}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\paragraph{Internalizing Reasoning (Fig.~\\ref{fig:internal})}\nTo stress-test whether implicit reasoning can replace explicit CoT, we evaluate on a hard subset---sessions flagged by a large foundation LLM as requiring above-average reasoning, where bypassing CoT should hurt most. The first two points trace the \\emph{same} RL-OPD checkpoint with and without CoT: removing the trace at inference drops Recall and NDCG sharply on both 0.6B and 1.7B students (\\textbf{$-$6--7\\%} R@1/N@1, \\textbf{$-$3--5\\%} R@3/N@3), confirming the CoT carries real ranking signal on this slice. A second RL pass closes the gap entirely and slightly surpasses the CoT reference at the head of the ranking (R@1/N@1: \\textbf{0.3012} vs.\\ \\textbf{0.2968} for 0.6B; \\textbf{0.3070} vs.\\ \\textbf{0.3059} for 1.7B), and matches it at deeper cutoffs (0.6B R@5: \\textbf{0.9256} vs.\\ \\textbf{0.9278}; N@5: \\textbf{0.6174} vs.\\ \\textbf{0.6190}, both within $\\sim$0.3\\%). The OPD-pretrained backbone already encodes a robust ranking prior over reasoning traces, so the second RL phase only needs to re-route this prior into the direct-output policy, internalizing CoT through the shared backbone. The deployed artifact is thus reasoning-free at iso- or super-CoT quality even on reasoning-heavy traffic.\n\n\n\\subsection{Reasoning Quality and Ablation}\n\\label{sec:reasoning_analysis}\n\n\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.75\\linewidth]{figure/gr2_ablation_reasoning.png}\n \\caption{Reasoning quality (5 rubrics evaluated by LLM-as-a-judge using Claude CLI) of different GR2 variants.}\n \\label{fig:reasoning_judge}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\paragraph{Reasoning quality across training recipes (Fig.~\\ref{fig:reasoning_judge}).}\nApplying RL directly on top of the zero-shot checkpoint slightly degrades reasoning quality across all five rubrics relative to OPD-initialized variants; the degradation is sharpest on \\textbf{Depth} (\\mbox{$\\approx$}$1.02$, near the rubric floor), confirming that RL alone learns to \\emph{rank well without thinking well}.\nThe \\textbf{RL-OPD} recipe recovers reasoning quality while preserving the ranking gains, producing traces that are simultaneously shorter and more focused.\n\n\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.75\\linewidth]{figure/gr2_ablation_perf.png}\n \\caption{Ranking performance of different GR2 variants.}\n \\label{fig:ablation}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{A case study demonstrating the value of GR2 vs.\\ the pointwise legacy baseline on a representative session. \\textcolor{red}{Red} marks the clicked candidate. Special tokens and SID are removed for readability.}\n \\label{tab:reasoning_case_study}\n \\scriptsize\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{6pt}\n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.15}\n \\begin{tabular}{@{}p{0.4\\textwidth} p{0.22\\textwidth} p{0.32\\textwidth}@{}}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{User interaction history} & \\textbf{Legacy baseline (Top-6)} & \\textbf{GR2 reasoning + Top-6 (reranked indices)} \\\\\n \\midrule\n\n \\begin{enumerate}[leftmargin=1.2em,nosep,label=\\textbf{\\arabic*.}]\n \\item TRX AMBIDEXTROUS HOLSTER PRO (TRX Holster): The TRX HolsterTM Slim offers reliable compatibility and a snug fit for your Glock, P80, Smith \\& Wess...\n \\item Leather Drop Leg Holster with Light (Falco): Light-bearing Duty Drop Leg holster made of leather, specifically designed for professional use and ...\n \\item Leather Drop Leg Holster with Light (Falco): Light-bearing Duty Drop Leg holster made of leather, specifically designed for professional use and ...\n \\item Menseventwear Casual Men's Double Breasted Tweed Herringbone V Neck Waistcoat XS / Brown (Adam Reed): 20\\% Wool / 80\\% Polyester Herringbone V Neck 2 Real Welt pocket Double Breasted 8 Buttons Back metal ...\n \\item US Flag \\& Constitution Pistol Case (Relic Wood): US Flag \\& Constitution Pistol Case The perfect pistol case for proud and patriotic handgun owners. I...\n \\item Guides Choice® Speed Loader Pouch (Diamond D Custom Leather): Due To Popular Demand We Have Created What We Believe To Be A Very Ergonomic And Easy To Use Pouch F...\n \\item Alaska Hunter Hip Holster (Diamond D Custom Leather): The Alaska Hunter Leather Gun Holster Is A Hip Holster With Ease Of Carry In Mind. We Have Placed Th...\n \\item Leather Drop Leg Holster with Light (Falco): Light-bearing Duty Drop Leg holster made of leather, specifically designed for professional use and ...\n \\item Wearable Recorder: Wearable Recorder\n \\item John Wayne Cowboy Leather Vest - Brown Real Sheep Leather Waistcoat For Mens (Handmade)\n \\item Minolta MND20 Point \\& Shoot Digital Camera with SD Card (Minolta): Whether you're sightseeing, celebrating with family, or gathering with friends, this point and shoot...\n \\item Gordon® 6 in. Bowie Knife (Gordon®): The GORDONTM 6 in. Bowie Knife is perfect for piercing and cutting in tight spaces. Stainless steel b...\n \\item Jos. A. Bank Solid Watch Cap (Jos. A. Bank): A versatile essential for cooler weather, this watch cap is designed for both warmth and timeless st...\n \\item HyperIce Hyperboot by Nike × (HyperIce): These wearable technology shoes offer three levels of heat and Normatec dynamic air compression to s...\n \\item Alleviate Loft 2 Left Foot Brace (Alleviate): Get immediate relief from plantar fasciitis or posterior tibial tendonitis (PTTD) pain with the Alle...\n \\end{enumerate}\n\n &\n\n \\begin{enumerate}[leftmargin=1.2em,nosep,label=\\textbf{\\arabic*.}]\n \\item Diesel Men9.5us Leather Lace-up Boots Dark Brown Distressed Finish Almost Unused (Diesel)\n \\item Oakley Probation Polished Chrome No Lens Oo4041-02 Inmate Metal Rare (Oakley)\n \\item 1-1/2\" Domed Face German-style Chasing Hammer 11\" Length Jewelry Making Tool (2)\n \\item \\textcolor{red}{70s-80ś Germany Police German Policeman Genuine Leather Leather Coat Vintage (Police)}\n \\item Mens Leather Jeans Pants Trouser 5 Pockets Cowhide Brown Breeches Bluf Levis 501 (Dexa Apperals)\n \\item Cnc Stainless Steel Replacement Safety Razor Stubby Short 3.0\" Inch Handle Only (Unspecified)\n \\end{enumerate}\n &\n <think>\n \n The user has a history of clicking on various products, mainly related to holsters, leather items, and some accessories. Let's look at their previous interactions to see what they like.\n They have a strong interest in leather holsters and cases (TRX, Falco, Diamond D), which are all related to firearms accessories. They also clicked on leather coats, like the John Wayne Vest and Menseventwear. So products related to leather and accessories would be a good fit.\n \n Looking at the products to predict: \n \\begin{enumerate}[leftmargin=1.2em,nosep,label=\\textbf{\\arabic*.}]\n \\item The first one is Leather boots.\n \\item Oakley is a brand they haven't clicked before, but maybe not relevant.\n \\item The third one is a jewelry making tool. The user didn't click anything like this before.\n \\item The forth one is similar to previous leather coats (John Wayne Cowboy Vest, Menseventwear Waistcoat) they clicked on.\n \\item Mens Leather Jeans Pants – They clicked on leather pants/jeans in the past (like the Menseventwear Waistcoat).\n \\item Cnc Stainless Steel Razor – The user didn't click on any razors before.\n \\end{enumerate}\n \n Product 4 (Leather Coat) is similar in style. Product 5 (Leather Pants) is also a type of clothing. Product 1 (Leather Boots) might be a bit less relevant than pants but could be clicked if they like the style. Product 2 (Oakley Probation) is not leather and not firearms. Product 3 (Jewelry tool) and product 6 (Stainless Steel Razor) are not aligned with their past behavior.\n \n So the most likely clicked would be 4 and 5, followed by 1. Product 2 (Oakley), 3 (tool), and 6 (razor) might be lower on the list. \n \n </think>\n \n [4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 6]\n \n \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\n\n\\paragraph{Ablation: training recipe trade-offs (Fig.~\\ref{fig:ablation}).}\n\\label{sec:ablation}\nWe compare three recipes side-by-side on both ranking metrics and reasoning quality:\n(i) RL-only on the zero-shot checkpoint, and\n% (ii) SFT$\\,\\to\\,$RL, and\n(ii) \\textbf{RL-OPD}.\nRL-only matches \\textbf{RL-OPD} on ranking metrics but underperforms on every reasoning rubric;\n% SFT$\\,\\to\\,$RL exhibits model collapse at industrial scale---reasoning becomes degenerate even where ranking metrics remain acceptable---which is what motivated us to adopt OPD as a scalable alternative to SFT in the first place.\n\\textbf{RL-OPD} Pareto-dominates both, supporting our headline claim that OPD supplies the reasoning prior while RL sharpens the ranking objective on top of it.\n\n\n\\paragraph{Case study (Table~\\ref{tab:reasoning_case_study}).}\nGR2 grounds its ranking in product attributes (category, material, function) and the user's revealed click patterns---semantics the sparse-ID baseline cannot represent. From a history dominated by leather holsters, pistol cases, and leather outerwear, GR2 infers a coherent ``leather goods + firearms accessories'' profile and promotes the vintage leather police coat to the top, recovering the click that the baseline ranks fourth. Non-leather, off-theme candidates (jewelry-making hammer, safety razor, Oakley sunglasses) are correctly pushed to the bottom, while the leather boots and leather pants are kept in the middle as plausible but weaker matches.\n\n\n\n\\section{Related Works}\\label{sec:related}\n\n\\paragraph{Generative LLM RecSys}\nRecent work increasingly reformulates recommendation as sequence generation. TIGER~\\citep{rajput2023recommender} pioneered the use of Semantic IDs (SIDs), discretizing item representations via RQ-VAE to enable autoregressive recommendation without large embedding tables. OneRec~\\citep{zhou2025onerec} cast multiple recommendation tasks into a unified text-to-text LLM framework, and OneRec-Think~\\citep{liu2025onerec} extended it with explicit reasoning traces, showing that chain-of-thought intermediate steps improve accuracy and robustness. OpenOneRec~\\citep{zhou2025openonerec} contributes a reproducible research framework for this family. PLUM~\\citep{he2025plum} similarly uses continued pre-training to align LLMs with the recommendation domain and adds a task-specific fine-tuning objective for generative retrieval.\nGR2 inherits the SID and item-alignment ideas but differs in three respects: (1) a tokenizer that achieves substantially higher SID uniqueness, (2) high-quality reasoning traces produced via targeted prompting and rejection sampling, and (3) a DAPO-based reward optimization.\n\n\\paragraph{Reasoning LLM}\nChain-of-thought (CoT) prompting elicits multi-step reasoning by generating intermediate steps before final answers~\\citep{wei2022chain}, and subsequent work has formalized and extended reasoning structures beyond CoT~\\citep{xia2025beyond,wang2024strategic}. RL methods such as GRPO and its variants further improve reasoning faithfulness and coherence via verifiable rewards~\\citep{shao2024deepseekmath,yu2025dapo,zheng2025group,chen2025minimax}, providing the broader context for our optimization strategy.\nA close work is LLM-based document re-ranking. ReaRank reasons before re-ranking passage lists via RL~\\citep{zhang2025rearank}; Rank-R1 applies RL-based reasoning optimization to document ranking~\\citep{feng2025iranker}; ReasonRank and MM-R5 extend reasoning-augmented reranking to multi-view and multi-modal settings~\\citep{xu2025mm}; $R^4ec$~\\citep{gu2025r} adds iterative reflection and refinement; and \\citet{wang2025llm} use a candidate-randomization bootstrap to improve fairness in LLM-based reranking. GR2 differs in its focus on semantic IDs and reward functions tailored to recommendation re-ranking, combined with structured reasoning traces and rejection sampling for higher-quality supervision.\n\n\n\n\\section{Conclusion}\\label{sec:con}\nWe presented \\textbf{GR2}, a Generative Reasoning Re-Ranker that brings LLM world knowledge and chain-of-thought reasoning to the final re-ranking stage of large-scale recommendation systems. GR2 combines mid-training on SIDs, reasoning-trace distilled from a stronger teacher, and RL with verifiable rewards. To make the recipe industry-viable, we further introduced a context compressor that cuts input length by $>$80\\% at iso-quality, OPD as a scalable alternative to SFT, and reasoning-internalizing CoT distillation that delivers a $\\sim$15$\\times$ serving-ROI gain.\nAcross industrial-scale traffic, GR2 improves over internal baselines (+18.7\\% R@1, +7.1\\% R@3; +9.6\\% N@3), with gains robust to test-set scale, two-week traffic staleness, and increasing model size. Ablations and LLM-as-judge analysis confirm that OPD supplies the reasoning prior while RL sharpens the ranking objective on top of it---neither is sufficient alone. \n\n\n\n\n\\clearpage\n\\newpage\n\\bibliographystyle{assets/plainnat}\n\\bibliography{paper}\n\n% \\clearpage\n% \\newpage\n% \\beginappendix\n\n% \\section{First appendix}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091185,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31985"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31985"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Zohar Nussinov"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Giorgi Tsereteli and Zohar Nussinov"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Non-Maxwellian Velocity Statistics in Supercooled Liquids and Their Possible Relation to Super-Arrhenius Viscosity"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"29 pages, 18 figures"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.soft"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"For particles of fixed mass, classical equilibrium statistical mechanics dictates a Maxwellian velocity distribution determined solely by the temperature, regardless of the interactions, density, or structure. Supercooled glass forming liquids realize long lived metastable states that evade equilibrium crystallization and may thus violate assumptions underlying Maxwellian statistics. We numerically demonstrate that supercooled liquids can exhibit persistent non-Maxwellian velocity distributions with deviations connected to their exceptionally slow super-Arrhenius relaxation. Our work is motivated by a general result establishing that long lived metastable states may exhibit finite width distributions of intensive variables. A distribution of temperatures implies non-Maxwellian velocity statistics. We test this prediction by introducing stochastic thermostats that generate stationary states while, unlike conventional thermostats, not imposing Maxwellian velocity distributions. Simulations with these thermostats yield long lived states that have, by comparison to Maxwellian velocity distributions, an excess kurtosis $0<\\kappa\\lesssim0.3$. Crystallization is strongly impeded with increasing $\\kappa$. In a minimal description, temperature fluctuations are characterized by a dimensionless width $\\overline{A}$ with $\\kappa\\simeq3\\overline{A}^{2}$. The nearly constant $\\overline{A}$ (of an average value $0.08$ and standard deviation $0.03$) found in viscosity data collapse across $45$ glass formers and in specific heat signatures is consistent with kurtosis found in our simulations. Long time non-Maxwellian velocity statistics may thus link slow relaxation, transport, and thermodynamic measurements. Independent of the tested theory, the stochastic thermostats that we introduce offer a molecular dynamics route to non-Maxwellian velocity statistics."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:22:36 GMT"},{"version":"v2","created":"Wed, 01 Jul 2026 16:22:03 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:22:36 GMT\"\n },\n {\n \"version\": \"v2\",\n \"created\": \"Wed, 01 Jul 2026 16:22:03 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-02"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Tsereteli","Giorgi",""],["Nussinov","Zohar",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Tsereteli\",\n \"Giorgi\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Nussinov\",\n \"Zohar\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: main6.bbl\n================================================\n%merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked\n%Control: key (0)\n%Control: author (72) initials jnrlst\n%Control: editor formatted (1) identically to author\n%Control: production of article title (-1) disabled\n%Control: page (0) single\n%Control: year (1) truncated\n%Control: production of eprint (0) enabled\n\\begin{thebibliography}{117}%\n\\makeatletter\n\\providecommand \\@ifxundefined [1]{%\n \\@ifx{#1\\undefined}\n}%\n\\providecommand \\@ifnum [1]{%\n \\ifnum #1\\expandafter \\@firstoftwo\n \\else \\expandafter \\@secondoftwo\n \\fi\n}%\n\\providecommand \\@ifx [1]{%\n \\ifx #1\\expandafter \\@firstoftwo\n \\else \\expandafter \\@secondoftwo\n \\fi\n}%\n\\providecommand \\natexlab [1]{#1}%\n\\providecommand \\enquote [1]{``#1''}%\n\\providecommand \\bibnamefont [1]{#1}%\n\\providecommand \\bibfnamefont [1]{#1}%\n\\providecommand \\citenamefont [1]{#1}%\n\\providecommand \\href@noop [0]{\\@secondoftwo}%\n\\providecommand \\href [0]{\\begingroup \\@sanitize@url \\@href}%\n\\providecommand \\@href[1]{\\@@startlink{#1}\\@@href}%\n\\providecommand \\@@href[1]{\\endgroup#1\\@@endlink}%\n\\providecommand \\@sanitize@url [0]{\\catcode `\\\\12\\catcode `\\$12\\catcode `\\&12\\catcode `\\#12\\catcode `\\^12\\catcode `\\_12\\catcode `\\%12\\relax}%\n\\providecommand \\@@startlink[1]{}%\n\\providecommand \\@@endlink[0]{}%\n\\providecommand \\url [0]{\\begingroup\\@sanitize@url \\@url }%\n\\providecommand \\@url [1]{\\endgroup\\@href {#1}{\\urlprefix }}%\n\\providecommand \\urlprefix [0]{URL }%\n\\providecommand \\Eprint [0]{\\href }%\n\\providecommand \\doibase [0]{http://dx.doi.org/}%\n\\providecommand \\selectlanguage [0]{\\@gobble}%\n\\providecommand \\bibinfo [0]{\\@secondoftwo}%\n\\providecommand \\bibfield [0]{\\@secondoftwo}%\n\\providecommand \\translation [1]{[#1]}%\n\\providecommand \\BibitemOpen [0]{}%\n\\providecommand \\bibitemStop [0]{}%\n\\providecommand \\bibitemNoStop [0]{.\\EOS\\space}%\n\\providecommand \\EOS [0]{\\spacefactor3000\\relax}%\n\\providecommand \\BibitemShut [1]{\\csname bibitem#1\\endcsname}%\n\\let\\auto@bib@innerbib\\@empty\n%</preamble>\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Ediger}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1996)\\citenamefont {Ediger}, \\citenamefont {Angell},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Nagel}}]{doi:10.1021/jp953538d}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Ediger}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.~A.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Angell}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~R.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Nagel}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1021/jp953538d} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Phys.\\ Chem.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {100}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {13200} (\\bibinfo {year} {1996})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Angell}(1995)}]{bib:angell}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.~A.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Angell}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1126/science.267.5206.1924} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Science}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {267}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1924} (\\bibinfo {year} {1995})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Berthier}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Biroli}(2011)}]{BB}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont {Berthier}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Biroli}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.587} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Rev.\\ Mod.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {83}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {587} (\\bibinfo {year} {2011})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Nussinov}(2024)}]{Nussinov2024}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Nussinov}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1016/j.aop.2024.169634} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Ann.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {463}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {169634} (\\bibinfo {year} {2024})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Nussinov}(2017)}]{grant16}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Nussinov}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1080/14786435.2017.1281448} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Philos.\\ Mag.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {97}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1509} (\\bibinfo {year} {2017})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Weingartner}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2016)\\citenamefont {Weingartner}, \\citenamefont {Pueblo}, \\citenamefont {Nogueira}, \\citenamefont {Kelton},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Nussinov}}]{grant15}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {N.~B.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Weingartner}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.}~\\bibnamefont {Pueblo}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.}~\\bibnamefont {Nogueira}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.~F.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kelton}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Nussinov}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.3389/fmats.2016.00050} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Front.\\ Mater.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {3}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {50} (\\bibinfo {year} {2016})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Weingartner}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2015)\\citenamefont {Weingartner}, \\citenamefont {Pueblo}, \\citenamefont {Kelton},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Nussinov}}]{preprint2}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {N.~B.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Weingartner}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.}~\\bibnamefont {Pueblo}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.~F.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kelton}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Nussinov}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\enquote {\\bibinfo {title} {Critical assessment of the equilibrium melting-based, energy distribution theory of supercooled liquids and application to jammed systems},}\\ } (\\bibinfo {year} {2015}),\\ \\Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.04565} {arXiv:1512.04565} \\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Vogel}(1921)}]{bib:vft}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.}~\\bibnamefont {Vogel}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Z.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {22}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {645} (\\bibinfo {year} {1921})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Fulcher}(1925)}]{bib:vft2}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Fulcher}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1925.tb12387.x} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Am.\\ Ceram.\\ Soc.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {8}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {339} (\\bibinfo {year} {1925})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Tammann}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Hesse}(1926)}]{bib:vft3}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Tammann}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.~Z.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Hesse}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1002/zaac.19261560119} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Anorg.\\ Allgem.\\ Chem.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {156}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {245} (\\bibinfo {year} {1926})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Ediger}(2000{\\natexlab{a}})}]{ediger2000spatially}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Ediger}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1146/annurev.physchem.51.1.99} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Annu.\\ Rev.\\ Phys.\\ Chem.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {51}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {99} (\\bibinfo {year} {2000}{\\natexlab{a}})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Debenedetti}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Stillinger}(2001)}]{Debenedetti2001}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.~G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Debenedetti}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.~H.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Stillinger}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1038/35065704} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Nature}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {410}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {259} (\\bibinfo {year} {2001})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Xue}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2022)\\citenamefont {Xue}, \\citenamefont {Nogueira}, \\citenamefont {Kelton},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Nussinov}}]{jing}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Xue}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Nogueira}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.~F.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kelton}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Nussinov}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physical Review Research}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {4}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {043047} (\\bibinfo {year} {2022})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Zhao}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2013)\\citenamefont {Zhao}, \\citenamefont {Simon},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {McKenna}}]{amber2013}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Zhao}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~L.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Simon}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.~B.}\\ \\bibnamefont {McKenna}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1038/ncomms2809} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Nat.\\ Commun.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {4}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1783} (\\bibinfo {year} {2013})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Blodgett}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2015)\\citenamefont {Blodgett}, \\citenamefont {Egami}, \\citenamefont {Nussinov},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Kelton}}]{grant3}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Blodgett}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {T.}~\\bibnamefont {Egami}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Nussinov}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.~F.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kelton}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1038/srep13837} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Sci.\\ Rep.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {5}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {13837} (\\bibinfo {year} {2015})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Flenner}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Szamel}(2015)}]{Flenner2015}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.}~\\bibnamefont {Flenner}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Szamel}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1038/ncomms8392} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Nat.\\ Commun.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {6}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {7392} (\\bibinfo {year} {2015})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Illing}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2017)\\citenamefont {Illing}, \\citenamefont {Fritschi}, \\citenamefont {Kaiser}, \\citenamefont {Klix}, \\citenamefont {Maret},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Keim}}]{Illing2017}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont {Illing}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont {Fritschi}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.}~\\bibnamefont {Kaiser}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.~L.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Klix}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Maret}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.}~\\bibnamefont {Keim}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1073/pnas.1612964114} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Proc.\\ Natl.\\ Acad.\\ Sci.\\ U.S.A.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {114}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1856} (\\bibinfo {year} {2017})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Leutheusser}(1984)}]{bib:mct1}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.}~\\bibnamefont {Leutheusser}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevA.29.2765} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ A}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {29}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {2765} (\\bibinfo {year} {1984})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Bengtzelius}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1984)\\citenamefont {Bengtzelius}, \\citenamefont {G{\\\"o}tze},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Sj{\\\"o}lander}}]{bib:mct2}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {U.}~\\bibnamefont {Bengtzelius}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.}~\\bibnamefont {G{\\\"o}tze}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Sj{\\\"o}lander}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1088/0022-3719/17/33/016} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Phys.\\ C: Solid State Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {17}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {5915} (\\bibinfo {year} {1984})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {G{\\\"o}tze}(2008)}]{bib:mct3}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.}~\\bibnamefont {G{\\\"o}tze}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {title} {Complex Dynamics of Glass-Forming Liquids: A Mode-Coupling Theory}}}\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {Oxford University Press},\\ \\bibinfo {year} {2008})\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Janssen}(2018)}]{mode_coupling_L}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.~M.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Janssen}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.3389/fphy.2018.00097} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Front.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {6}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {97} (\\bibinfo {year} {2018})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Mirigian}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Schweizer}(2013)}]{Mirigian2013unified}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont {Mirigian}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Schweizer}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {arXiv:1310.6018}\\ } (\\bibinfo {year} {2013})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Palmer}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1984)\\citenamefont {Palmer}, \\citenamefont {Stein}, \\citenamefont {Abrahams},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Anderson}}]{Palmer1984}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.~G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Palmer}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.~L.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Stein}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.}~\\bibnamefont {Abrahams}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.~W.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Anderson}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.958} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {53}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {958} (\\bibinfo {year} {1984})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Berthier}(2021)}]{Berthier2021}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont {Berthier}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {arXiv:2010.12244v2}\\ } (\\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Keys}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2013)\\citenamefont {Keys}, \\citenamefont {Garrahan},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Chandler}}]{keys}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Keys}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~P.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Garrahan}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.}~\\bibnamefont {Chandler}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1073/pnas.1300430110} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Proc.\\ Natl.\\ Acad.\\ Sci.\\ U.S.A.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {110}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {4482} (\\bibinfo {year} {2013})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Adam}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Gibbs}(1965)}]{AGlass}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Adam}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~H.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Gibbs}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1063/1.1696442} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {43}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {139} (\\bibinfo {year} {1965})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Goldstein}(1969)}]{Goldstein2}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Goldstein}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1063/1.1672177} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {51}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {3728} (\\bibinfo {year} {1969})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Biroli}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Bouchaud}(2012)}]{RFOT:crit_assess}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Biroli}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.-P.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Bouchaud}},\\ }in\\ \\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {booktitle} {Structural Glasses and Supercooled Liquids: Theory, Experiment, and Applications}}},\\ \\bibinfo {editor} {edited by\\ \\bibinfo {editor} {\\bibfnamefont {P.~G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Wolynes}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {editor} {\\bibfnamefont {V.}~\\bibnamefont {Lubchenko}}}\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {John Wiley \\& Sons},\\ \\bibinfo {year} {2012})\\ pp.\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {31--113}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Kirkpatrick}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Wolynes}(1987)}]{Ted87b}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {T.~R.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kirkpatrick}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.~G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Wolynes}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevB.36.8552} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ B}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {36}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {8552} (\\bibinfo {year} {1987})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Kirkpatrick}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1989)\\citenamefont {Kirkpatrick}, \\citenamefont {Thirumalai},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Wolynes}}]{ktw}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {T.~R.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kirkpatrick}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.}~\\bibnamefont {Thirumalai}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.~G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Wolynes}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.1045} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ A}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {40}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1045} (\\bibinfo {year} {1989})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Lubchenko}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Wolynes}(2007)}]{ref:lubchenkowolynes}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {V.}~\\bibnamefont {Lubchenko}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.~G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Wolynes}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104518} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Annu.\\ Rev.\\ Phys.\\ Chem.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {58}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {235} (\\bibinfo {year} {2007})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {M{\\'{e}}zard}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Parisi}(1999)}]{bib:ag2}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {M{\\'{e}}zard}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Parisi}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1063/1.479796} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {111}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1076} (\\bibinfo {year} {1999})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Parisi}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2020)\\citenamefont {Parisi}, \\citenamefont {Urbani},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Zamponi}}]{bookZamponi}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Parisi}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.}~\\bibnamefont {Urbani}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.}~\\bibnamefont {Zamponi}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {title} {Theory of Simple Glasses: Exact Solutions in Infinite Dimensions}}}\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {Cambridge University Press},\\ \\bibinfo {year} {2020})\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Angelani}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2000)\\citenamefont {Angelani}, \\citenamefont {Parisi}, \\citenamefont {Ruocco},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Viliani}}]{ref:angelaniPEL}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont {Angelani}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Parisi}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Ruocco}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Viliani}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.1681} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ E}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {61}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1681} (\\bibinfo {year} {2000})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Parisi}(2000)}]{ref:parisiglasstrans}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Parisi}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00216-1} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physica A}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {280}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {115} (\\bibinfo {year} {2000})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Charbonneau}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2017)\\citenamefont {Charbonneau}, \\citenamefont {Kurchan}, \\citenamefont {Parisi}, \\citenamefont {Urbani},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Zamponi}}]{Patrick2017}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.}~\\bibnamefont {Charbonneau}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Kurchan}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Parisi}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.}~\\bibnamefont {Urbani}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.}~\\bibnamefont {Zamponi}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-025334} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Annu.\\ Rev.\\ Condens.\\ Matter Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {8}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {265} (\\bibinfo {year} {2017})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Kivelson}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Tarjus}(2008)}]{Steve_Gilles}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~A.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kivelson}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Tarjus}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1038/nmat2296} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Nat.\\ Mater.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {7}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {831} (\\bibinfo {year} {2008})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Kivelson}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1995)\\citenamefont {Kivelson}, \\citenamefont {Kivelson}, \\citenamefont {Zhao}, \\citenamefont {Nussinov},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Tarjus}}]{bib:KKZNT1}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.}~\\bibnamefont {Kivelson}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~A.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kivelson}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {X.}~\\bibnamefont {Zhao}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Nussinov}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Tarjus}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1016/0378-4371(95)00104-2} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physica A}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {219}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {27} (\\bibinfo {year} {1995})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Nussinov}(2004)}]{bib:KKZNT3}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Nussinov}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.014208} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ B}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {69}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {014208} (\\bibinfo {year} {2004})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Speck}(2019)}]{Speck2019}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {T.}~\\bibnamefont {Speck}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1088/1742-5468/ab2ace} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Stat.\\ Mech.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {2019}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {084015} (\\bibinfo {year} {2019})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Sillescu}(1999)}]{DH1}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.}~\\bibnamefont {Sillescu}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1016/S0022-3093(98)00610-3} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Non-Cryst.\\ Solids}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {243}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {81} (\\bibinfo {year} {1999})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Ediger}(2000{\\natexlab{b}})}]{DH2}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Ediger}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1146/annurev.physchem.51.1.99} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Annu.\\ Rev.\\ Phys.\\ Chem.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {51}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {99} (\\bibinfo {year} {2000}{\\natexlab{b}})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Richert}(2002)}]{DH3}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.}~\\bibnamefont {Richert}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1088/0953-8984/14/23/201} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Phys.:\\ Condens.\\ Matter}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {14}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {R703} (\\bibinfo {year} {2002})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Kob}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1997)\\citenamefont {Kob}, \\citenamefont {Donati}, \\citenamefont {Plimpton}, \\citenamefont {Poole},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Glotzer}}]{DH4}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.}~\\bibnamefont {Kob}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.}~\\bibnamefont {Donati}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Plimpton}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.~H.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Poole}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Glotzer}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2827} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {79}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {2827} (\\bibinfo {year} {1997})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Donati}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1998)\\citenamefont {Donati}, \\citenamefont {Douglas}, \\citenamefont {Kob}, \\citenamefont {Plimpton}, \\citenamefont {Poole},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Glotzer}}]{DH5}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.}~\\bibnamefont {Donati}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~F.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Douglas}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.}~\\bibnamefont {Kob}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Plimpton}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.~H.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Poole}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Glotzer}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2338} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {80}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {2338} (\\bibinfo {year} {1998})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Berthier}(2011)}]{dh10}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont {Berthier}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/Physics.4.42} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physics}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {4}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {42} (\\bibinfo {year} {2011})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Zhang}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2018)\\citenamefont {Zhang}, \\citenamefont {Maldonis}, \\citenamefont {Liu}, \\citenamefont {Schroers},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Volynes}}]{volynes}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.}~\\bibnamefont {Zhang}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Maldonis}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Liu}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Schroers}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.~M.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Volynes}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1038/s41467-018-03451-1} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Nat.\\ Commun.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {9}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1129} (\\bibinfo {year} {2018})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Berthier}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2011)\\citenamefont {Berthier}, \\citenamefont {Biroli}, \\citenamefont {Bouchaud}, \\citenamefont {Cipelletti},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {van Saarloos}}]{dh11}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont {Berthier}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Biroli}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.-P.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Bouchaud}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont {Cipelletti}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.}~\\bibnamefont {van Saarloos}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {title} {Dynamical Heterogeneities in Glasses, Colloids, and Granular Media}}}\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {Oxford University Press},\\ \\bibinfo {year} {2011})\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Widmer-Cooper}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2008)\\citenamefont {Widmer-Cooper}, \\citenamefont {Perry}, \\citenamefont {Harrowell},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Reichman}}]{dh12}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Widmer-Cooper}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.}~\\bibnamefont {Perry}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.}~\\bibnamefont {Harrowell}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.~R.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Reichman}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1038/nphys1056} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Nat.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {4}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {711} (\\bibinfo {year} {2008})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Nussinov}(2020)}]{preprint6}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Nussinov}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.114948} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Nucl.\\ Phys.\\ B}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {953}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {114948} (\\bibinfo {year} {2020})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Nussinov}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2018)\\citenamefont {Nussinov}, \\citenamefont {Weingartner},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Nogueira}}]{book_TOP}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Nussinov}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {N.~B.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Weingartner}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Nogueira}},\\ }in\\ \\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {booktitle} {Topological Phase Transitions and New Developments}}},\\ \\bibinfo {editor} {edited by\\ \\bibinfo {editor} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont {Brink}}, \\bibinfo {editor} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Gunn}}, \\bibinfo {editor} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~V.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Jose}}, \\bibinfo {editor} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~M.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kosterlitz}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {editor} {\\bibfnamefont {K.~K.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Phua}}}\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {World Scientific},\\ \\bibinfo {year} {2018})\\ pp.\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {61--79}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Nose}(1984)}]{Nose}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont {Nose}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1063/1.447334} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {81}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {511} (\\bibinfo {year} {1984})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Hoover}(1985)}]{Hoover}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.~G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Hoover}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ A}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {31}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1695} (\\bibinfo {year} {1985})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Andersen}(1980)}]{Andersen_thermostat}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Andersen}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1063/1.439486} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {72}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {2384} (\\bibinfo {year} {1980})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Hoover}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1982{\\natexlab{a}})\\citenamefont {Hoover}, \\citenamefont {Ladd},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Moran}}]{Langevin1}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.~G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Hoover}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Ladd}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont {Moran}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1818} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {48}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1818} (\\bibinfo {year} {1982}{\\natexlab{a}})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Evans}(1983)}]{Langevin2}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Evans}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1063/1.445214} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {78}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {3297} (\\bibinfo {year} {1983})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Kob}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Andersen}(1995)}]{Kob-Andersen}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.}~\\bibnamefont {Kob}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Andersen}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.51.4626} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ E}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {51}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {4626} (\\bibinfo {year} {1995})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Herrero}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Berthier}(2024)}]{PhysRevLett.132.258201}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.}~\\bibnamefont {Herrero}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont {Berthier}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.258201} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {132}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {258201} (\\bibinfo {year} {2024})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Gao}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2025)\\citenamefont {Gao}, \\citenamefont {Yu}, \\citenamefont {Schr{\\o}der},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Dyre}}]{gao2024unifiedpercolationscenarioalpha}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont {Gao}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.-B.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Yu}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {T.~B.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Schr{\\o}der}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Dyre}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Nat. Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {21}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {471} (\\bibinfo {year} {2025})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Cockrell}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2023)\\citenamefont {Cockrell}, \\citenamefont {Dicks}, \\citenamefont {Todorov}, \\citenamefont {Elena},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Trachenko}}]{fast}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.}~\\bibnamefont {Cockrell}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {O.}~\\bibnamefont {Dicks}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {I.~T.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Todorov}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~M.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Elena}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.}~\\bibnamefont {Trachenko}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1038/s41598-023-41931-7} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Sci.\\ Rep.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {1}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {13} (\\bibinfo {year} {2023})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Whitmer}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Luijten}(2010)}]{Whitmer2010}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~K.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Whitmer}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.}~\\bibnamefont {Luijten}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1088/0953-8984/22/10/104106} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Phys.:\\ Condens.\\ Matter}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {22}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {104106} (\\bibinfo {year} {2010})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Guiselin}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2022)\\citenamefont {Guiselin}, \\citenamefont {Scalliet},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Berthier}}]{OriginWings}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont {Guiselin}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.}~\\bibnamefont {Scalliet}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont {Berthier}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1038/s41567-022-01508-z} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Nat.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {18}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1} (\\bibinfo {year} {2022})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Zorm}(2022)}]{WingExplained}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.}~\\bibnamefont {Zorm}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1038/s41567-022-01553-8} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Nat.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {18}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {374} (\\bibinfo {year} {2022})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Hasyim}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Mandadapu}(2024)}]{EmergentFaci}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.~R.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Hasyim}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.~K.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Mandadapu}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1073/pnas.2322592121} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Proc.\\ Natl.\\ Acad.\\ Sci.\\ U.S.A.}\\ } (\\bibinfo {year} {2024}),\\ 10.1073/pnas.2322592121}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Frey}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2024)\\citenamefont {Frey} \\emph {et~al.}}]{frey2024interplayliquidlikestressdrivendynamics}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Frey}} \\emph {et~al.},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\enquote {\\bibinfo {title} {On the interplay of liquid-like and stress-driven dynamics in a metallic glass former observed by temperature scanning {XPCS}},}\\ } (\\bibinfo {year} {2024}),\\ \\Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12306} {arXiv:2403.12306} \\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Van~Hoang}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2015)\\citenamefont {Van~Hoang}, \\citenamefont {Teboul},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Odagaki}}]{doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b08912}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {V.}~\\bibnamefont {Van~Hoang}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {V.}~\\bibnamefont {Teboul}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {T.}~\\bibnamefont {Odagaki}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b08912} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Phys.\\ Chem.\\ B}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {119}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {15752} (\\bibinfo {year} {2015})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Lam}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2024)\\citenamefont {Lam} \\emph {et~al.}}]{lam2024distinguishableparticleglassycrystalsimplest}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.~S.~I.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Lam}} \\emph {et~al.},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\enquote {\\bibinfo {title} {Distinguishable-particle glassy crystal: the simplest molecular model of glass},}\\ } (\\bibinfo {year} {2024}),\\ \\Eprint {http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15805} {arXiv:2402.15805} \\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Jung}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2023)\\citenamefont {Jung}, \\citenamefont {Biroli},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Berthier}}]{Jung2023Predicting}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Jung}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Biroli}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont {Berthier}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.238202} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {130}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {238202} (\\bibinfo {year} {2023})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Baidakov}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2010)\\citenamefont {Baidakov} \\emph {et~al.}}]{LJisotherm}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {V.~G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Baidakov}} \\emph {et~al.},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1063/1.3439585} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.}\\ } (\\bibinfo {year} {2010}),\\ 10.1063/1.3439585}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Wierschem}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Manousakisa}(2010)}]{LJmelting}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.}~\\bibnamefont {Wierschem}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.}~\\bibnamefont {Manousakisa}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1016/J.PHPRO.2010.01.213} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physics Procedia}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {3}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1515} (\\bibinfo {year} {2010})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Sosso}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2016)\\citenamefont {Sosso} \\emph {et~al.}}]{MDnuc}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Sosso}} \\emph {et~al.},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00744} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Chem.\\ Rev.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {116}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {7078} (\\bibinfo {year} {2016})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Hafskjold}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2019)\\citenamefont {Hafskjold}, \\citenamefont {Travis}, \\citenamefont {Hass}, \\citenamefont {Hammer}, \\citenamefont {Aasen},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Wilhelmsen}}]{Hafskjold_2019}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont {Hafskjold}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.~P.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Travis}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~B.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Hass}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Hammer}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Aasen}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibnamefont {Wilhelmsen}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1080/00268976.2019.1664780} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Mol.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {117}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {3754} (\\bibinfo {year} {2019})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Kirova}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Norman}(2015)}]{visc}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.~M.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kirova}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.~E.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Norman}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1088/1742-6596/653/1/012106} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Phys.:\\ Conf.\\ Ser.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {653}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {012106} (\\bibinfo {year} {2015})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Zhao}(2008)}]{Zhao2008BriefIT}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Y.}~\\bibnamefont {Zhao}},\\ }\\href {https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:4826717} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Tech. Rep. Research Note Thermostat, University of California, San Diego}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {007}} (\\bibinfo {year} {2008})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Hoover}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Hoover}(2024)}]{https://doi.org/10.12921/cmst.2024.0000005}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.}~\\bibnamefont {Hoover}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.}~\\bibnamefont {Hoover}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Computational Methods in Science and Technology}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {30}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {17} (\\bibinfo {year} {2024})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Lowe}(1999)}]{Lowe}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.~P.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Lowe}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1209/epl/i1999-00365-x} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Europhys.\\ Lett.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {47}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {145} (\\bibinfo {year} {1999})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Lechner}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Dellago}(2008)}]{Lechner2008}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.}~\\bibnamefont {Lechner}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.}~\\bibnamefont {Dellago}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1063/1.2977970} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {129}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {114707} (\\bibinfo {year} {2008})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {ten Wolde}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1996)\\citenamefont {ten Wolde}, \\citenamefont {Ruiz-Montero},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Frenkel}}]{tenWolde1996}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.~R.}\\ \\bibnamefont {ten Wolde}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Ruiz-Montero}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.}~\\bibnamefont {Frenkel}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1063/1.471638} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {104}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {9932} (\\bibinfo {year} {1996})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Cohen}(2007)}]{Cohen2007}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~M.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Cohen}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1007/978-0-387-68276-9} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {title} {Numerical Methods for {Laplace} Transform Inversion}}},\\ \\bibinfo {series} {Numerical Methods and Algorithms}, Vol.~\\bibinfo {volume} {5}\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {Springer},\\ \\bibinfo {year} {2007})\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Jaynes}(1957)}]{Jaynes1957}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.~T.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Jaynes}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRev.106.620} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {106}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {620} (\\bibinfo {year} {1957})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Sausset}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2010)\\citenamefont {Sausset}, \\citenamefont {Biroli},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Kurchan}}]{sausset}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.}~\\bibnamefont {Sausset}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Biroli}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Kurchan}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1007/s10955-010-9994-x} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Stat.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {140}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {718} (\\bibinfo {year} {2010})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Hansen}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {McDonald}(2013)}]{HansenMcDonald}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.-P.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Hansen}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {I.~R.}\\ \\bibnamefont {McDonald}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {title} {Theory of Simple Liquids}}},\\ \\bibinfo {edition} {4th}\\ ed.\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {Academic Press},\\ \\bibinfo {year} {2013})\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Angell}(2011)}]{AngellheatE}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.~A.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Angell}},\\ }in\\ \\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {booktitle} {Glassy, Amorphous and Nano-Crystalline Materials}}},\\ \\bibinfo {editor} {edited by\\ \\bibinfo {editor} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Sestak}}, \\bibinfo {editor} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Mares}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {editor} {\\bibfnamefont {P.}~\\bibnamefont {Hubik}}}\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {Springer},\\ \\bibinfo {address} {Berlin},\\ \\bibinfo {year} {2011})\\ pp.\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {21--40}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Chen}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2023)\\citenamefont {Chen}, \\citenamefont {Nussinov},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Kelton}}]{nucleation1}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.}~\\bibnamefont {Chen}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Nussinov}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.~F.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kelton}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.064205} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ B}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {108}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {064205} (\\bibinfo {year} {2023})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Chen}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2024)\\citenamefont {Chen}, \\citenamefont {Sheng}, \\citenamefont {Dahlberg}, \\citenamefont {Nussinov},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Kelton}}]{nucleation2}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.}~\\bibnamefont {Chen}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Y.}~\\bibnamefont {Sheng}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Dahlberg}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Nussinov}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.~F.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kelton}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1016/j.actamat.2024.119860} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Acta Mater.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {270}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {119860} (\\bibinfo {year} {2024})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Steinhardt}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1983)\\citenamefont {Steinhardt}, \\citenamefont {Nelson},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Ronchetti}}]{BOO}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Steinhardt}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.~R.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Nelson}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Ronchetti}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.784} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ B}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {28}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {784} (\\bibinfo {year} {1983})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Yu}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2020)\\citenamefont {Yu}, \\citenamefont {Schr{\\\"o}ter},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Sperl}}]{Yu2020}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.}~\\bibnamefont {Yu}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Schr{\\\"o}ter}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Sperl}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.208007} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {124}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {208007} (\\bibinfo {year} {2020})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Kanazawa}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2015)\\citenamefont {Kanazawa}, \\citenamefont {Sano}, \\citenamefont {Sagawa},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Hayakawa}}]{Kanazawa2015}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.}~\\bibnamefont {Kanazawa}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {T.~G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Sano}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {T.}~\\bibnamefont {Sagawa}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.}~\\bibnamefont {Hayakawa}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.090601} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {114}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {090601} (\\bibinfo {year} {2015})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Patron}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2021)\\citenamefont {Patron}, \\citenamefont {S{\\'a}nchez-Rey},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Prados}}]{Patron2021}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Patron}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont {S{\\'a}nchez-Rey}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Prados}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.064127} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ E}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {104}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {064127} (\\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Megias}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Santos}(2022)}]{Megias2022}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Megias}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Santos}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.3390/e24101436} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Entropy}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {24}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1436} (\\bibinfo {year} {2022})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Nussinov}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Chakrabarty}(2022)}]{Planck22}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Nussinov}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont {Chakrabarty}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1016/j.aop.2022.168970} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Ann.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {443}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {168970} (\\bibinfo {year} {2022})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Cavagna}(2009)}]{Cavagna}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Cavagna}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.03.003} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rep.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {476}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {51} (\\bibinfo {year} {2009})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Kelton}(2022)}]{Kelton_review}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.~F.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kelton}},\\ }in\\ \\href {\\doibase 10.1007/978-3-030-87665-5_5} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {booktitle} {Metallurgy in Space, Recent Results from {ISS}}}},\\ \\bibinfo {series and number} {The Minerals, Metals, \\& Materials Series},\\ \\bibinfo {editor} {edited by\\ \\bibinfo {editor} {\\bibfnamefont {H.-J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Fecht}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {editor} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Mohr}}}\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {Springer},\\ \\bibinfo {year} {2022})\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Hoover}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1982{\\natexlab{b}})\\citenamefont {Hoover}, \\citenamefont {Ladd},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Moran}}]{Hoover1985}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.~G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Hoover}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~J.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Ladd}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont {Moran}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1818} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {48}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1818} (\\bibinfo {year} {1982}{\\natexlab{b}})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Berendsen}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1984)\\citenamefont {Berendsen}, \\citenamefont {Postma}, \\citenamefont {van Gunsteren}, \\citenamefont {DiNola},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Haak}}]{berendsen1984molecular}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.~J.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Berendsen}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~P.~M.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Postma}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.~F.}\\ \\bibnamefont {van Gunsteren}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {DiNola}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~R.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Haak}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1063/1.448134} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {81}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {3684} (\\bibinfo {year} {1984})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Allen}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Tildesley}(2017)}]{AllenTildesley2017}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.~P.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Allen}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Tildesley}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {title} {Computer Simulation of Liquids}}},\\ \\bibinfo {edition} {2nd}\\ ed.\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {Oxford University Press},\\ \\bibinfo {year} {2017})\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Frenkel}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Smit}(2002)}]{FrenkelSmit2002}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.}~\\bibnamefont {Frenkel}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont {Smit}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {title} {Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications}}},\\ \\bibinfo {edition} {2nd}\\ ed.\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {Academic Press},\\ \\bibinfo {address} {San Diego},\\ \\bibinfo {year} {2002})\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Bobylev}(1982)}]{Bobylev1976}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~V.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Bobylev}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Sov.\\ Phys.\\ Dokl.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {27}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {29} (\\bibinfo {year} {1982})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Cercignani}(1988)}]{Cercignani1988}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.}~\\bibnamefont {Cercignani}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {title} {The {Boltzmann} Equation and Its Applications}}}\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {Springer},\\ \\bibinfo {address} {New York},\\ \\bibinfo {year} {1988})\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Chaudhuri}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2007)\\citenamefont {Chaudhuri}, \\citenamefont {Berthier},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Kob}}]{Chauduri}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.}~\\bibnamefont {Chaudhuri}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont {Berthier}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.}~\\bibnamefont {Kob}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.060604} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {99}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {060604} (\\bibinfo {year} {2007})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Bhowmik}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2018)\\citenamefont {Bhowmik}, \\citenamefont {Tah},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Karmakar}}]{Bhowmik}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.~P.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Bhowmik}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {I.}~\\bibnamefont {Tah}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont {Karmakar}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.98.022122} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ E}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {98}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {022122} (\\bibinfo {year} {2018})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Rahman}(1964)}]{Rahman1964}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Rahman}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRev.136.A405} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {136}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {A405} (\\bibinfo {year} {1964})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Donati}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1999)\\citenamefont {Donati}, \\citenamefont {Glotzer}, \\citenamefont {Poole}, \\citenamefont {Kob},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Plimpton}}]{Donati1999}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.}~\\bibnamefont {Donati}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Glotzer}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.~H.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Poole}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.}~\\bibnamefont {Kob}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Plimpton}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.3107} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ E}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {60}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {3107} (\\bibinfo {year} {1999})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Fredrickson}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Andersen}(1984)}]{Fredrickson1984}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.~H.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Fredrickson}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Andersen}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1244} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {53}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1244} (\\bibinfo {year} {1984})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {J{\\\"a}ckle}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Eisinger}(1991)}]{JackleEisinger1991}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {J{\\\"a}ckle}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont {Eisinger}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1007/BF01453764} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Z.\\ Phys.\\ B}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {84}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {115} (\\bibinfo {year} {1991})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Chandler}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Garrahan}(2010)}]{Chandler2010}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.}~\\bibnamefont {Chandler}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~P.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Garrahan}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1146/annurev.physchem.59.032607.093540} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Annu.\\ Rev.\\ Phys.\\ Chem.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {61}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {191} (\\bibinfo {year} {2010})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Berthier}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2005)\\citenamefont {Berthier}, \\citenamefont {Chandler},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Garrahan}}]{Berthier2004}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont {Berthier}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.}~\\bibnamefont {Chandler}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~P.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Garrahan}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1209/epl/i2004-10401-5} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Europhys.\\ Lett.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {69}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {320} (\\bibinfo {year} {2005})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Turnbull}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Fisher}(1949)}]{TurnbullFisher1949}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.}~\\bibnamefont {Turnbull}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Fisher}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1063/1.1747055} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {17}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {71} (\\bibinfo {year} {1949})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Wedekind}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2007)\\citenamefont {Wedekind}, \\citenamefont {Strey},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Reguera}}]{Wedekind2008}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Wedekind}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.}~\\bibnamefont {Strey}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.}~\\bibnamefont {Reguera}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1063/1.2713401} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {126}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {134103} (\\bibinfo {year} {2007})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Beck}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Cohen}(2003)}]{beck2003superstatistics}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.}~\\bibnamefont {Beck}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.~G.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Cohen}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {322}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {267} (\\bibinfo {year} {2003})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Cohen}(2004)}]{cohen2004superstatistics}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.~G.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Cohen}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Pramana}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {64}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {635} (\\bibinfo {year} {2004})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Arpornthip}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2011)\\citenamefont {Arpornthip}, \\citenamefont {Balatsky}, \\citenamefont {Graf},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Nussinov}}]{tanwa}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {T.}~\\bibnamefont {Arpornthip}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~V.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Balatsky}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Graf}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Nussinov}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physical Review B}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {84}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {17} (\\bibinfo {year} {2011})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Gallo}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2018)\\citenamefont {Gallo}, \\citenamefont {Magaletti},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Casciola}}]{superheat}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Gallo}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.}~\\bibnamefont {Magaletti}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.~M.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Casciola}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.053604} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Fluids}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {3}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {053604} (\\bibinfo {year} {2018})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Nold}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2012)\\citenamefont {Nold}, \\citenamefont {Ribeiro}, \\citenamefont {Ramisch}, \\citenamefont {Huang}, \\citenamefont {Muller}, \\citenamefont {Scott}, \\citenamefont {Stroth},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {{ASDEX Upgrade Team}}}]{localeTplasma}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont {Nold}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {T.~T.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Ribeiro}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Ramisch}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Huang}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.~W.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Muller}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Scott}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {U.}~\\bibnamefont {Stroth}}, \\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibnamefont {{ASDEX Upgrade Team}}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1088/1367-2630/14/6/063022} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {New J.\\ Phys.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {14}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {063022} (\\bibinfo {year} {2012})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Doyon}(2020)}]{doyon}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont {Doyon}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.18} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {SciPost Phys.\\ Lect.\\ Notes}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {18}} (\\bibinfo {year} {2020}),\\ 10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.18}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Evans}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Morriss}(1984)}]{EvansMorriss1984}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Evans}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.~P.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Morriss}},\\ }\\href {\\doibase 10.1103/PhysRevA.30.1528} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ A}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {30}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1528} (\\bibinfo {year} {1984})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Evans}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Morriss}(2008)}]{EvansMorrissBook}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Evans}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.~P.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Morriss}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {title} {Statistical Mechanics of Nonequilibrium Liquids}}}\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {Cambridge University Press},\\ \\bibinfo {year} {2008})\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\end{thebibliography}%\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main6.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[aps,pra,reprint,showpacs,twocolumn,superscriptaddress,eqsecnum]{revtex4-2}\n\n\\usepackage[margin=0.75in]{geometry}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}\n\\usepackage[caption=false]{subfig} \n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\usepackage{titlesec}\n\\usepackage{comment}\n\\usepackage{makecell}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{siunitx}\n\\usepackage{multirow,array}\n\\usepackage[breakable,skins]{tcolorbox}\n\\usepackage{amsthm}\n\n\\makeatletter\n% Define a standard environment alias that safely pipes the width parameter\n\\newenvironment{subfigure}[2][b]{%\n \\begin{minipage}{#2}%\n % Redirect caption styles inside this box to format beautifully \n \\def\\caption##1{\\gdef\\@subcap{\\parbox{\\linewidth}{\\centering ##1}}}%\n \\gdef\\@subcap{}% Ensure it initializes cleanly\n}{%\n % Check if a caption text was declared, and append it safely at the base\n \\ifx\\@subcap\\@empty\\else\n \\par\\vspace{4pt}{\\small\\@subcap}% Renders a clean, full-width caption\n \\fi\n \\end{minipage}%\n}\n\\makeatother\n% ========================================================\n\n\\makeatletter\n\\@ifundefined{widetext}{%\n \\newenvironment{widetext}{}{}\n}{}\n\\makeatother\n\n\\hypersetup{\n colorlinks,\n linkcolor={red!50!black},\n citecolor={blue!50!black},\n urlcolor={blue!80!black}\n}\n\n\\newcommand{\\openissue}[1]{%\n \\par\\smallskip\\noindent\n \\fcolorbox{purple}{purple!7}{%\n \\parbox{0.9\\linewidth}{\\textcolor{purple}{\\textbf{[OPEN ISSUE --- reconcile before submission]}\\\\ #1}}%\n }\\par\\smallskip}\n\n\\newcommand{\\kt}{\\kappa(t)}\n\\newcommand{\\tcoll}{\\tau_{\\mathrm{coll}}}\n\\newcommand{\\tbeta}{\\tau_\\beta}\n\\newcommand{\\talpha}{\\tau_\\alpha}\n\\newcommand{\\txtal}{t_{\\mathrm{xtal}}}\n\\newcommand{\\Abar}{\\bar{A}}\n\\titleformat{\\section}{\\large\\bfseries}{\\thesection}{1em}{}\n\\newcommand{\\chapter}[1]{\\section{#1}}\n\\setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}\n\n\\date{}\n\n% --- ported from appendix preamble for fused document ---\n\\theoremstyle{remark}\n\\newtheorem{remark}{Remark}\n\\newcommand{\\kss}{\\kappa}\n\\newcommand{\\kinit}{\\kappa(0)}\n% --------------------------------------------------------\n\n\\begin{document}\n\\title{Non-Maxwellian Velocity Statistics in Supercooled Liquids and Their Possible Relation to Super-Arrhenius Viscosity}\n\n\n\\author{Giorgi Tsereteli}\n\\email{g.tsereteli@wustl.edu}\n\\affiliation{Department of Physics, Washington University, St.~Louis, Missouri 63130, USA}\n\\author{Zohar Nussinov}\n\\email{zohar@wustl.edu}\n\\affiliation{Department of Physics, Washington University, St.~Louis, Missouri 63130, USA}\n\\affiliation{LPTMC, CNRS-UMR 7600, Sorbonne Universit\\'e, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris cedex 05, France}\n\\affiliation{Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom}\n\\date{\\today}\n\n\\begin{abstract}\nFor particles of fixed mass, classical equilibrium statistical mechanics dictates a Maxwellian velocity distribution determined solely by the temperature, regardless of the interactions, density, or structure. Supercooled glass forming liquids realize long lived metastable states that evade equilibrium crystallization and may thus violate assumptions underlying Maxwellian statistics. We numerically demonstrate that supercooled liquids can exhibit persistent non-Maxwellian velocity distributions with deviations connected to their exceptionally slow super-Arrhenius relaxation. Our work is motivated by a general result establishing that long lived metastable states may exhibit finite width distributions of intensive variables. A distribution of temperatures implies non-Maxwellian velocity statistics. We test this prediction by introducing stochastic thermostats that generate stationary states while, unlike conventional thermostats, not imposing Maxwellian velocity distributions. Simulations with these thermostats yield long lived states that have, by comparison to Maxwellian velocity distributions, an excess kurtosis $0<\\kappa\\lesssim0.3$. Crystallization is strongly impeded with increasing $\\kappa$. In a minimal description, temperature fluctuations are characterized by a dimensionless width $\\overline{A}$ with $\\kappa\\simeq3\\overline{A}^{2}$. The nearly constant $\\overline{A}$ (of an average value $0.08$ and standard deviation $0.03$) found in viscosity data collapse across $45$ glass formers and in specific heat signatures is consistent with kurtosis found in our simulations. Long time non-Maxwellian velocity statistics may thus link slow relaxation, transport, and thermodynamic measurements. Independent of the tested theory, the stochastic thermostats that we introduce offer a molecular dynamics route to non-Maxwellian velocity statistics.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\\section{Thermostats and velocity distributions}\n\\label{cpt1}\n\n\\subsection{Theoretical Introduction}\n\nSupercooled liquids realize an enigmatic long-lived metastable state \\cite{doi:10.1021/jp953538d,bib:angell,BB} of a lifetime that is $10^{10}$ to $10^{17}$ times longer than their natural underlying microscopic timescales. On general grounds, in the limit of divergent metastable state lifetimes, all local few particle expectation values \\cite{Nussinov2024} (see also Appendix \\ref{app:theorem}) can be expressed as unique weighted averages of their equilibrium counterparts. In the current work, we focus on a corollary of this result that affords {\\it a link between the deviation of the single particle velocity from the equilibrium Maxwellian distribution to the shear viscosity}. In the current numerical work, we test this predicted link with experiment to find consistent agreement. We will largely quantify the latter deviation via the excess kurtosis of the velocity distribution relative to that in equilibrium. We first outline theoretical elements underlying this suggested link between the single particle velocity statistics and the shear viscosity in a supercooled liquid:\n\n(i)~For a classical particle of fixed mass, regardless of details of the system (include specific interparticle interactions), the equilibrium velocity distribution is Maxwellian and is set by the temperature alone.\n\n\n(ii)~Although temperature is strictly an equilibrium concept, a corollary of Ref. \\cite{Nussinov2024} implies that the velocity distribution of a long lived metastable state at a given empirically determined temperature $T$ can be expressed as a weighted sum of Maxwellians of effective temperatures $T'$ drawn from a distribution $P(T|T')$. A finite width of this distribution $P$ yields a non-Maxwellian velocity distribution. \n\n\n(iii)~This width is captured by a dimensionless parameter $\\overline{A}:=\\sigma_{T'}/\\langle T'\\rangle = \\sigma_{T'}/T$, which is related to the measured excess velocity kurtosis $\\kappa$ by \n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\label{eq:kappa_Abar} \n\\kappa\\simeq3\\overline{A}^{2}.\n\\end{eqnarray}\n\n(iv) $\\overline{A}$ determines the weight of the distribution $P$ that lies above the equilibrium liquidus temperature (the temperature above which the system is completely liquid). In equilibrium, only states of temperature $T'$ above the liquidus temperature contribute to sustained hydrodynamic flow. Thus, the shear viscosity $\\eta(T)$ is controlled by this statistical weight above the liquidus temperature. Putting all of the pieces together provides the said connection between velocity statistics and the temperature dependence of the viscosity.\n\nThe resulting expression for $\\eta(T)$ depends only on the liquidus temperature and $\\overline{A}$ \\cite{Nussinov2024,grant16,grant15,preprint2}. As we will illustrate, this expression does not introduce additional conjectured temperatures of the type found in the Vogel Fulcher Tammann (VFT) law ~\\cite{bib:vft,bib:vft2,bib:vft3}. When compared against experimental data of $45$ glass formers, the expression is consistent over sixteen decades of the viscosity. Statistical comparisons ~\\cite{grant15,preprint2} further indicate that the resulting single parameter form describes the data more accurately than the three parameter VFT expression. \n\nUndertaking tests, in conventional numerical experiments, the predicted link between velocity statistics and the viscosity encounters some hurdles. Conventional MD thermostats enforce the equilibrium Maxwell velocity distribution and therefore preclude, from the very start, the observation of possible deviations from Maxwellian statistics. We consequently employ alternative dynamical schemes that leave the velocity distribution unconstrained. We introduce and employ stochastic thermostats that do not impose a Maxwellian velocity distribution. Technical details are provided in Appendix~\\ref{app:thermostats}. These thermostats allow the velocity distribution to be measured rather than prescribed. With the aid of these thermostats, we determine the excess kurtosis and the associated value of $\\overline{A}$ and compare it with that inferred from viscosity data. If the excess kurtosis were merely a transient consequence of coupling to the bath, it would be expected to disappear rapidly. In simple solvable instances, uniform Boltzmann equation considerations indeed suggest a collision rate dominated relaxation toward a Maxwellian distribution (Appendix~\\ref{app:boltzmann}). The finite excess kurtosis probability distributions that aim to explore allow for both nontrivial spatial and momentum distributions and are trivially time translationally invariant. \n\nThe excess kurtosis is also related to other properties of the metastable state. The probability of crystallization decreases once $\\kappa\\gtrsim0.15$. Related signatures appear in the distribution of single particle potential energies. The excess kurtosis is therefore associated with properties of the metastable state beyond the velocity distribution itself.\n\n\nBefore proceeding further, we briefly regress to a broad introduction of the general problem at hand- that of supercooled liquids and the glass transition. Notwithstanding extensive progress that resulted from intense investigations over many decades \\cite{doi:10.1021/jp953538d,ediger2000spatially,Debenedetti2001}, the dynamics of supercooled glass-forming fluids near their glass transition remain ill-understood. When simple single substance liquids are cooled slowly, they typically crystallize below their freezing temperature (or melting temperature $T_{m}$). Similarly, in numerous complex metallic alloys, instead of a single melting temperature, the equilibrium system is purely liquid above the above discussed liquidus temperature $T_{l}$ and purely solid below the so, called solidus temperature; for simple single component systems, the liquidus and melting temperatures are one and the same, $T_{l} = T_{m}$. In the opposite limit---rapid cooling, or ``supercooling''---crystallization is kinetically bypassed, and the system enters a long lived metastable state. After a material-dependent waiting time (but before the system eventually crystallizes or ``devitrifies''), rich universal phenomena emerge: local observables and their dynamics converge to a steady state that remains poorly understood to this day. Remarkably, despite their vastly different properties, the supercooled liquid and the equilibrated crystalline phase are governed by the same underlying Hamiltonian. Adding further complexity, many glassformers are multicomponent systems in which equilibrium melting is not a sharp transition. Instead, it occurs over a temperature range bounded by the solidus temperature where melting begins and a higher temperature liquidus temperature $T_{l}$ denotes where it is completed.\n\nAt sufficiently low temperatures ($T < T_g$), supercooled liquids form, on typical experimental time scales, amorphous solids---glasses. This time scale definition of $T_g$ (relying on typical time scales rather than conventional markers of a phase transition) is somewhat ad-hoc. The ``glass transition'' at temperature $T=T_{g}$ has been known empirically for millennia and is the focus of intense modern research. This ``transition'' differs sharply from conventional thermodynamic transitions. Most strikingly, relaxation times can increase by a factor of $10^{14}$ as temperature drops, with no corresponding signature in thermodynamic quantities such as the specific heat. The most celebrated description of this dramatic dynamical slowdown is the VFT law~\\cite{bib:vft,bib:vft2,bib:vft3}\nwhich predicts a divergence of viscosity and relaxation times at finite temperature,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\eta(T) = \\eta_0 \\exp\\!\\left[\\frac{D\\,T_0}{T - T_0}\\right].\n\\label{eq:VFT_law}\n\\end{equation}\nHere, \\( \\eta_0 \\), \\( D \\), and \\( T_0 \\) are liquid dependent parameters. Regardless of the veracity of this form, including notably whether a true transition appears at a temperature $T_0$ of whether the latter is only an artifact when attempting to fit with the VFT equation, the dynamics of supercooled liquids depart much more radically from Arrhenius activated dynamics than those in conventional fluids \\cite{jing}. The extreme (``super-Arrhenius'') slowing down of liquid dynamics as their temperature is lowered is a hallmark of supercooled liquids. If Eq. (\\ref{eq:VFT_law}) were to be taken literally, the temperature $T_{0}$ would mark an essential singularity at which the relaxation times scales diverge; this is the so-called ``ideal glass'' temperature that many theories attempt to rationalize. The VFT law and related fits predicting a true divergence of relaxation times at temperatures below the glass transition have been called into question by experiment~\\cite{amber2013,grant3}. Nonetheless, the VFT fit is well known to capture the quintessential behavior of supercooled liquids above their glass transition temperature. Regardless of the accuracy of specific fitting forms, the rapid increase of the viscosity of these liquids (especially in so-called ``fragile'' glassformers \\cite{bib:angell}) as their temperature drops is a hallmark of these systems.\n\nA vexing problem in understanding these systems are their very slow dynamics (these slow dynamics are typically especially acute in simulated {\\it in silico} systems that aim to provide a microscopic picture of what occurs). Numerical studies using MD simulations in both two and three dimensions have provided valuable information on relaxation behavior \\cite{Flenner2015, Illing2017}, but a unified theoretical description remains elusive. Several theoretical approaches have been developed to address this problem. These can largely be divided into those focusing on dynamic versus thermodynamic descriptions. The former approaches include the celebrated mode coupling theories \\cite{bib:mct1,bib:mct2,bib:mct3,mode_coupling_L} and ideas concerning ``dynamic facilitation'' \\cite{Mirigian2013unified, Palmer1984,Berthier2021,keys} seeking to describe heterogeneous relaxation through constrained correlated mobility events. There are numerous statistical mechanics approaches, e.g., \\cite{AGlass,Goldstein2,RFOT:crit_assess,BB,Ted87b,ktw,ref:lubchenkowolynes,bib:ag2,bookZamponi,ref:angelaniPEL,ref:parisiglasstrans,Patrick2017,Steve_Gilles,bib:KKZNT1,bib:KKZNT3} that assume that some core ideas from equilibrium statistical mechanics may still remain applicable for the long lived (yet still metastable) supercooled fluid state.\nThese thermodynamic approaches often build on mean-field concepts, compare the free energies of the long lived metastable supercooled state of fluids below their melting temperature to those of the bona fide equilibrium solid (crystalline) state, discuss energy landscapes, configurational entropy effects, avoided transitions, and explore countless other interesting ideas.\nNotable work has also modeled localized mobility defects using statistical mechanical approaches to capture slow dynamics \\cite{Speck2019}.\n\nFor decades, it has been unquestionably assumed that the particle velocity distribution in a supercooled liquid follows the Maxwell-Boltzmann form, yet this has not been tested to date. The prevailing view is that the many body system navigates a complex high-dimensional energy landscape spanned by generalized coordinates specifying atomic configurations, while the momentum distribution remains a simple Maxwell-Boltzmann form.\n\nThis assumption has persisted even after the discovery of spatially nonuniform ``dynamical heterogeneities'' \\cite{DH1,DH2,DH3,DH4,DH5,dh10,volynes,dh11,dh12}. Within configuration energy landscape approaches \\cite{BB,Goldstein2}, a Maxwellian velocity distribution is still assumed for supercooled liquids---the effective potential may differ from that in the equilibrium system, but the kinetic energy is taken to be that of an equilibrium system at fixed temperature.\n\nThe general theorem of Ref. ~\\cite{Nussinov2024} establishes that the reduced few body probability density of any stationary state of an open system is a weighted superposition of equilibrium densities at different effective values of all state variables. This result is general: it makes no assumption about how the stationary state was prepared or what broadened its distribution of effective state variables. In the present work, we focus on the distribution $P(T|T')$ of effective local temperatures. This is natural since, for particles of fixed mass, the single particle equilibrium velocity distribution is Maxwell-Boltzmann at temperature $T'$, independent of the interaction potential, the particle density, and all other state variables. (More generally, the distribution extends to all state variables including the local particle number density.) One mechanism by which $P(T|T')$ acquires a finite width is the following~\\cite{preprint6} (Appendix \\ref{rem:drive}). When a liquid is rapidly cooled, the external environment must couple to an extensive fraction of all atomic sites in order to change the energy density at a finite rate. The fluctuations of this common environment are imparted simultaneously to spatially distant sites, generating long range correlations and a system size-independent ($\\mathcal{O}(1)$) standard deviation $\\sigma_\\epsilon$ of the global average energy density. Once cooling ceases, local uncorrelated noise destroys the long range covariance between sites, so the global average energy becomes self-averaging with fluctuations of order $1/\\sqrt{N}\\to 0$. However, the \\emph{spatial} heterogeneity that was imprinted across sites during the drive --- the $\\mathcal{O}(1)$-wide distribution of effective local temperatures $\\{T'_i\\}$ across different spatial regions --- cannot be removed: the system is trapped by nucleation barriers and structural arrest, so rapid supercooling prevents global equilibration and only local rearrangements on scales of $\\sim\\mathsf{n}$ particles are possible. It is the width of $T'$ in the \\emph{reduced few body local probability density} --- the spatial variation of effective local temperatures across the system --- that constitutes the finite-width $P(T|T')$ of the central theorem and gives rise to non-Maxwellian velocity statistics. A detailed derivation by explicit integration over the external drive is given in Appendix \\ref{app:theorem}. The system then relaxes toward the nearest stationary state it can reach. True equilibrium, the crystal, is inaccessible: nucleation is suppressed by a large free-energy barrier near the melting temperature, and structural relaxation is arrested by the high viscosity at low temperatures. The system instead settles into the long lived metastable supercooled state, stationary on all timescales satisfying $\\tau_{\\rm micro} \\ll t \\ll \\tau_{\\rm xtal}$. The broadening of $P(T|T')$ is essential: if it were sharp, the supercooled liquid would be indistinguishable from a true equilibrium state of the same Hamiltonian, which is the crystal. Earlier work~\\cite{book_TOP,grant16,grant15,preprint2} developed this physical picture and its consequences for viscosity and other observables of supercooled liquids, invoking a notion of \\emph{global} stationarity: the long time average of the full many body density was assumed to be stationary. The key advance of Ref.~\\cite{Nussinov2024} is to invoke instead \\emph{local} stationarity. Indeed, empirically, the long time average of local few body observables --- and hence of the reduced few body probability density --- equals the instantaneous local reduced probability density in the metastable supercooled state. This weaker and physically more natural condition is what allows the theorem to hold for a metastable system that is not globally stationary. The velocity distribution is related to $P(T|T')$ through a Laplace-transform relation. In practice, we do not attempt to invert this (ill-posed) transform but extract only its width via the moment relation Eq.~(\\ref{eq:kappa_Abar}). The width parameter $\\overline{A}$ of this distribution is the same quantity that collapses the viscosity of 45 experimental glass-forming liquids over sixteen decades onto a single universal curve~\\cite{grant15,Nussinov2024}. Conventional thermostats, by enforcing Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity statistics, erase this signal by construction. The thermostats introduced in the present work do not.\n\nA central aim of our work is to \\textbf{systematically study the velocity distributions} in supercooled liquids via MD simulations. Thermostats used in most conventional simulations (e.g., the Nos\\'e-Hoover \\cite{Nose,Hoover}, Andersen \\cite{Andersen_thermostat}, and Langevin \\cite{Langevin1,Langevin2} thermostats) are all guaranteed, by construction, to yield a Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution. Thus, due to the nature of these thermostats, deviations from the equilibrium Maxwellian velocity distribution may not be observed numerically when these conventional thermostats are used. Our MD results demonstrate that, when these thermostats are \\emph{not used}, supercooled Kob-Andersen type \\cite{Kob-Andersen} systems exhibit a \\emph{non-Maxwellian velocity distribution}.\n\nPrior to the current work, dynamical heterogeneities have been numerically probed and assumed to occur physically in the form of spatially fluctuating relaxation rates. Theoretically, much effort has been devoted to study how dynamic facilitation affects supercooled liquids in MD simulations. One approach \\cite{PhysRevLett.132.258201} creates spatial variation by applying rapid swap Monte Carlo dynamics to specific regions while using a global Nos\\'e--Hoover thermostat to maintain equilibrium.\nThe method that we describe in this work differs in that we do not preselect fast regions but rather aim to simulate the system as it is cooled in real experiment without imposing a Maxwellian velocity distribution. We modify the thermostat so that stronger coupling appears randomly in both space and time. This generates dynamically heterogeneous regions naturally, letting us compare the resulting behavior with that of standard thermostats at the same temperature.\n\nFor completeness, we briefly note related work. Recent work \\cite{gao2024unifiedpercolationscenarioalpha} has introduced a dual-temperature percolation framework for deeply supercooled glass formers, proposing that a single equilibrium temperature may not fully capture inherently non-equilibrium dynamics. Similarly, another study \\cite{fast} found that the subset of particles in truly equilibrated (i.e., non-supercooled) liquids that transit over distances longer than average can deviate from Maxwellian behavior. Previous studies \\cite{Whitmer2010} showed that colloidal systems with different boundary conditions can develop non-Maxwellian velocity distributions. Signatures of nontrivial low temperatures dynamics were investigated in \\cite{OriginWings,WingExplained}; in these works, asymmetric features in relaxation spectra were observed and subsequently rationalized. In Ref. \\cite{EmergentFaci}, dynamic facilitation was proposed to emerge from localized stress excitations modeled using Markovian dynamics. Our work shares this motivation but takes a more physically grounded approach. As alluded to above, instead of introducing explicit stress-based rules, we probed the dynamics of supercooled fluids using a custom stochastic thermostat designed to mimic physical cooling processes. Specifically, the thermostat simulates random central collisions between system particles and fictitious bath particles drawn from an equilibrated colder reservoir. This creates local energy exchange through collision-like events, similar to how real hot systems may cool down. Initially, there is a large difference in velocities between the hot and cold particles. As they equilibrate, the distribution of particle velocities become less broad yet might still (and indeed does) self consistently stabilize towards a broader than\na Maxwellian distribution. The distribution emulates the non-uniform cooling background. The broader the background distribution from which the velocities are drawn from stochastically in our collision based framework, the broader the single particle velocity distribution of the system. This collision-based energy exchange naturally produces dynamically heterogeneous regions in space and time. We reiterate that the resulting dynamics that we find indeed differ qualitatively from those generated by conventional global thermostats such as Nos\\'e--Hoover or Berendsen, which impose equilibrium constraints without modeling physically local cooling mechanisms. Recent experimental studies of metallic glass formers using temperature scanning X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy \\cite{frey2024interplayliquidlikestressdrivendynamics} support the idea that multiple distinct dynamical processes coexist as systems approach glassy states. Earlier computational work \\cite{doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b08912} demonstrated that dynamic heterogeneities emerge even in minimal MD models such as two-dimensional Lennard-Jones liquids, which are among the systems we examine here. Additional insight comes from \\cite{lam2024distinguishableparticleglassycrystalsimplest}, which shows that glassy dynamics in three-dimensional Lennard-Jones systems can be revealed through potential energy distributions rather than solely through structural or kinetic observables. We similarly find that local potential energy distributions provide a robust probe of supercooled dynamics, as they fluctuate more slowly during relaxation than velocity distributions or structural measures. Recent work has used machine learning to predict dynamical quantities such as four-point correlation functions and local temperature fields \\cite{Jung2023Predicting}. In constructing our MD systems, we followed established methods and benchmarks \\cite{LJisotherm,LJmelting,MDnuc,Hafskjold_2019,visc,Zhao2008BriefIT,https://doi.org/10.12921/cmst.2024.0000005}.\n\nBuilding on the above noted phase space concepts and the more general, theory unbiased, quest to understand dynamics in supercooled liquids that are unconstrained by conventional thermostats that automatically impose a Maxwell-Boltzman distribution of velocities, we studied the dynamics in these systems with physically motivated thermostats.\n\nThe prevailing interpretation of dynamical heterogeneity assumes that notwithstanding the existence of spatially varying dynamics, the velocities themselves maintain a Boltzmann distribution throughout. In the present work we question this assumption. If spatially varying regions harbor genuinely faster/slower particles, then the single particle velocity distribution may be broader than that in Maxwellian systems and the respective excess kurtosis $\\kappa$ will not vanish.\n\nWe study both two- and three-dimensional systems with a dominant focus on the latter. Of all the figures in this paper, only Fig.~\\ref{fig:2Dkurt} reports our results on two-dimensional systems. In three dimensions, the thermostat's role as the stabilizer of the system becomes apparent much more quickly for comparably sized systems, so the thermostat-present versus thermostat-absent comparison is not feasible. Instead, we compare the same system evolved with two markedly different thermostats while modulating the degree of non-equilibrium through the velocity kurtosis. The advantage of the three-dimensional systems is the naturally emergent crystallization at a consistent melting temperature, unlike the two-dimensional case where Mermin--Wagner fluctuations preclude such an outcome.\n\n\\subsection{Thermostat Mechanisms and Non-Maxwellian Sampling}\n\nTo investigate how thermostats influence supercooled molecular dynamics, we design cooling protocols where different thermostats cool an initially equilibrated liquid to the same target temperature using comparable cooling schedules. All thermodynamic parameters remain constant; only the thermostat coupling is varied. This isolates the effect of the realistic coupling needed to achieve rapid cooling on the emergent dynamics.\n\nWe consider two broad classes of thermostats: Continuous coupling schemes, such as Langevin, Berendsen, and Nos\\'e--Hoover thermostats, act on all particles at every timestep via weak, persistent interactions that continuously regulate the kinetic degrees of freedom. In contrast, collision-based stochastic schemes, including the Heavy-Tailed Lowe--Andersen (HTLA) and Two-Bath Andersen thermostats, operate through discrete, instantaneous perturbations applied to a randomly selected subset of particles, resulting in intermittent but typically stronger modifications of particle velocities. Details concerning these schemes, both the conventional thermostats together and the two stochastic thermostats introduced in this work, are provided in Appendix~\\ref{app:thermostats}. \n\nContinuous thermostats maintain near Maxwellian velocity statistics through frequent small adjustments. In contrast, collision-based stochastic thermostats introduce intermittent, localized energy exchanges that broaden the instantaneous velocity distribution even when the mean kinetic energy (temperature) remains the same.\n\nThese differences are evident in Fig.~\\ref{fig:velocity_comparison},\nwhere normalized velocity distributions are compared at equal temperatures.\nThe stochastic thermostat produces visibly heavier tails, whereas the\nBerendsen case closely follows the Maxwellian form.\n\nThe dynamical consequences are summarized in\nFig.~\\ref{fig:combined_kurtosis_structure}. Langevin dynamics promote smooth equilibration and crystallization, while the Two-Bath stochastic\nthermostat drives the system into a noisy steady state with sustained\ndeviations from Gaussian velocity statistics.\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{Pvcomp.png}\n \\label{fig:vel_stoch}\n \\caption[Velocity Distributions]{ Comparison of single particle velocity distributions (for a Cartesian component $v_x$)\n in the supercooled fluid obtained using different thermostats with a Maxwellian (Gaussian) velocity distribution of the same mean (zero) and standard deviation (set by the temperature). The orange curve corresponds to the Two baths Andersen thermostat, which exhibits enhanced excess kurtosis ($\\kappa = 0.30$) relative to the Maxwellian reference. The blue curve shows the distribution obtained using the Langevin thermostat,\n which closely follows the Maxwellian form ($\\kappa \\approx 0$). The highlighted regions indicate where the supercooled state distribution satisfies\n$P_{\\mathrm{supercooled}} (v_x)> P_{\\sf eq.}(v_x)$\nfeaturing heavier velocity tails at the same nominal temperature. Each distribution was obtained from a sample of 15000 velocities.\n }\n\\label{fig:velocity_comparison}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}{0.48\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{Kcomparison.png}\n \\caption{\\scriptsize Kurtosis comparison}\n \\label{fig:K_langevin}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}{0.48\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{BooComparison.png}\n \\caption{\\scriptsize Bond order comparison}\n \\label{fig:K_twobath}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption{\n Combined structural and dynamical comparison between equilibrium crystallization (Langevin dynamics) and nonequilibrium supercooling (Two-Bath Andersen thermostat).\n (a) Velocity kurtosis during relaxation: the Two-Bath thermostat produces a noisy steady state with higher excess kurtosis (\\(\\kappa = 0.32 > 0.004\\)), while Langevin yields smooth equilibration and crystallization. The curves are shifted so the Gaussian value (\\(k=3\\)) maps to zero.\n (b) Structural evolution: the bond orientational order parameter $B$ distinguishes the supercooled state (blue) from the crystalline state (orange). Both systems approach stationary regimes as seen from saturation of the self-intermediate scattering function.\n }\n \\label{fig:combined_kurtosis_structure}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\subsection{Velocity Kurtosis as a Measure of Non-Equilibrium Sampling}\n\nTo quantify deviations from Maxwellian statistics, we compute the\nkurtosis of a Cartesian velocity component,\n\\begin{equation}\nk := \\frac{\\langle (v_x-\\langle v_x \\rangle)^4 \\rangle}{\\langle (v_x - \\langle v_x \\rangle)^2 \\rangle},\n\\end{equation}\nwith the average $\\langle \\cdot \\rangle$ performed over all particles in the system within the ensemble that we simulate. In the absence of externally imposed symmetry breaking (such as in the supercooled liquids that we simulate), $\\langle v_x \\rangle =0$. Independent of temperature and spatial dimensionality, for a Maxwellian (a Gaussian distribution in each Cartesian velocity component),\nthe kurtosis is, trivially,\n$k = 3$.\nAlthough all of our simulations are classical, we note for completeness that the same value $k=3$ trivially appears for the Gaussian momentum distribution in the quantum arena for finite temperature harmonic atomic vibrations. To probe the deviations from a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, we therefore focus on the excess kurtosis\n\\begin{equation}\n\\kappa(t) := k(t) - 3.\n\\end{equation}\nHere $k(t)=\\langle v_\\alpha^{4}\\rangle/\\langle v_\\alpha^{2}\\rangle^{2}$ is the kurtosis of a single Cartesian velocity component $v_\\alpha$ (averaged over components and particles); the identity $\\kappa=3\\overline{A}^{2}$ and the two-bath result $\\kappa=3c^{2}$ are quoted in this same one-dimensional, per-component convention. Lastly, to characterize the relaxation process, we compute the time averaged\nexcess kurtosis over a time interval. The latter is thus explicitly defined as\n\\begin{equation}\n\\kappa :=\n\\frac{1}{t_f - t_0}\n\\int_{t_0}^{t_f} \\left[k(t)-3\\right] dt.\n\\end{equation}\nFinite-size fluctuations of the kurtosis in Gaussian samples have a variance scaling as\n$\\mathrm{Var}(k)\\sim 24/N$. For $N\\approx1500$ particles this implies\nstatistical fluctuations of the order of $\\sim 0.1$. As we will detail, the excess kurtosis values that we find\nwhen using stochastic thermostats are notably larger ($\\kappa \\sim 0.3$ for Two baths and $\\kappa \\sim 0.2$ for the HTLA discussed in the next section). These values exceed\npure sampling noise and represent genuine deviations from canonical\nvelocity statistics. This deviation underscores the viable appearance of non-Maxwellian velocity distributions in supercooled systems.\n\nThe time series displayed in Fig.~\\ref{fig:combined_kurtosis_structure} illustrate that, as is indeed known, conventional continuous thermostats reduce $\\kappa$ to zero during equilibration. By contrast, stochastic thermostats {\\it maintain a finite positive} $\\kappa$ even after the temperature has stabilized. In this stabilized regime, the system effectively equilibrates inasmuch as all conventional metrics (including the intermediate scattering function) point to. Monodisperse two-dimensional Lennard-Jones systems offer a particularly instructive case: their temperature remains stable for approximately 100~MD time units without active thermostat coupling, allowing direct comparison of dynamics with and without thermostatic control. Because such a small two-dimensional sample can be cooled with a strongly coupled thermostat and then completely decoupled for the initial relaxation without compromising the stability of the temperature, we can isolate the mean kurtosis of the system during relaxation and how it is affected by the presence of the thermostat. The results indicate that the velocity distributions of the supercooled systems progressively deviate from being Gaussian as the temperature is lowered. This effect is much less apparent when the thermostat is kept on and points to the canonical constraint imposed by conventional thermostats actively masking the intrinsic non-equilibrium broadening. Following a removal of the thermostat, the system displays substantially elevated transient kurtosis, revealing that canonical constraints suppress intrinsic non-equilibrium fluctuations (Fig.~\\ref{fig:2Dkurt}).\n\nThese observations establish $\\kappa$ as a practical and\ndimensionless measure of non-equilibrium velocity-space\nbroadening.\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{2DKurt.png}\n \\caption[2D kurtosis]{ The excess kurtosis $\\kappa$ of the temperature $T$ in a monodisperse two-dimensional Lennard-Jones system. $\\kappa$ is measured after 10 MD time units from the end of the quenching scheme. The orange points are taken without a thermostat's participation in the relaxation of the system while blue ones are from measurements with a Langevin thermostat active throughout the entire process. It is evident that, when supercooled, the system is more outlier prone without the participation of the thermostat.}\n \\label{fig:2Dkurt}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Stochastic Non-Equilibrium Thermostats: HTLA and Two-Bath}\n\nIn addition to conventional equilibrium thermostats, we employed two\ncollision-based stochastic schemes designed to sustain controlled\nnon-equilibrium velocity sampling: a Heavy-Tailed variant of the Lowe--Andersen (HTLA)\nthermostat \\cite{Lowe,Andersen_thermostat} and the Two-Bath form of the Andersen thermostat \\cite{Andersen_thermostat}.\nBoth the HTLA and the Two-Bath Andersen thermostat belong to the Andersen class of stochastic collision\nthermostats, in which particle velocities are intermittently reassigned\nthrough pairwise or single particle collision events occurring with a\nspecified rate. Unlike continuous drag based schemes, these thermostats\nintroduce strong stochastic perturbations. Consequently, these baths generate\nbroader than Maxwellian instantaneous velocity distributions even when the mean kinetic\ntemperature is fixed.\n\nThe Two-Bath thermostat achieves non-equilibrium steady states by\nrandomly thermalizing particles to one of two heat reservoirs at\ndifferent temperatures. The HTLA thermostat generalizes the\nLowe--Andersen framework by drawing post collision velocities from\nheavy-tailed distributions, thereby enhancing the probability of\nhigh-velocity excursions and amplifying velocity heterogeneity.\n\nIn both cases, the system reaches a stationary state with constant mean\ntemperature but non-Maxwellian velocity statistics, making these\nthermostats suitable for systematically tuning the degree of\nnon-equilibrium sampling. A detailed derivation of the algorithms, parameter choices, and\nstatistical properties of these thermostats is provided in Appendix \\ref{app:thermostats}. \n\nThe degree of non-equilibrium broadening accessible to each scheme is summarized in Fig.~\\ref{fig:kappa_contrast_comparison}, which shows the dependence of the steady state excess kurtosis $\\kappa$ on the thermostat contrast parameter for both schemes in a three-dimensional Lennard--Jones system, for supercooled (orange) and crystalline (blue) samples. For the HTLA thermostat (left panel), decreasing the contrast enhances the superstatistical broadening and produces a systematic growth of $\\kappa$; for the Two-Bath thermostat (right panel), the temperature contrast induces bimodal thermalization whose kurtosis grows with the temperature separation and collision frequency. Both schemes modulate the statistical profile of the system, but the Two-Bath thermostat accesses a broader range of $\\kappa$ values with less noise, which is why it is the primary tool used in the crystallization study below.\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}{0.48\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\linewidth]{kappa_comp_HTLA_final_title.png}\n \\caption{HTLA: $\\kappa$ vs Contrast}\n \\label{fig:kappa_htla_contrast}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}{0.48\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\linewidth]{kappa_comp_TwoBath_final_title.png}\n \\caption{Two-Bath Andersen: $\\kappa$ vs Contrast}\n \\label{fig:Kappa_twobath_contrast}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption[$\\kappa$ vs contrast]{\n Dependence of velocity-distribution kurtosis $\\kappa$ on thermostat contrast\n for two stochastic schemes in a 3D Lennard--Jones system for both supercooled (orange) and crystal (blue) samples.\n Left: Heavy-Tailed Lowe-Andersen (HTLA), where decreasing contrast enhances superstatistical broadening and produces systematic growth in excess kurtosis.\n Right: Two-Bath Andersen thermostat, where contrast induces bimodal thermalization and generates non-Gaussian velocity statistics whose kurtosis depends on the temperature separation and collision frequency.\n Both thermostats can modulate the statistical profile of the system, but the Two-Bath thermostat accesses a broader range of $\\kappa$ values with less noise.\n }\n \\label{fig:kappa_contrast_comparison}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}{0.48\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{Pordered.png}\n \\caption{}\n \\label{fig:cum_pcryst_80}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}{0.48\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{Pordered2.png}\n \\caption{}\n \\label{fig:cum_pcryst_120}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption{\n The cumulative probability distribution for local bond orientational order conditioned on the velocity-kurtosis threshold.\n For each threshold $\\kappa$, the curves show\n $P(\\mathrm{ordered}\\mid \\kappa' \\ge \\kappa)$.\n Panel (a) the results for 80 runs; panel (b) the corresponding result for 150 runs.\n Shaded bands: binomial standard error.\n Increased kurtosis suppresses crystallization.\n Both panels are restricted to the accessible range $\\kappa\\lesssim0.3$ (the horizontal axis runs only to $\\kappa\\simeq0.3$ in each); the suppression of ordering therefore occurs entirely within the $\\kappa\\lesssim0.3$ window set by the stochastic thermostats.}\n \\label{fig:cum_pcryst_combined}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{Pordered_3D.png}\n \\caption[P(local Order) $B^*$ threshold]{\n Three-dimensional representation of the crystallization probability\n $P(\\mathrm{cryst})$ as a function of excess velocity kurtosis $\\kappa$\n and bond order threshold $B_{\\mathrm{th}}$.\n The surface illustrates how increasing non-equilibrium velocity broadening\n (larger $\\kappa$) systematically reduces the likelihood of crystallization\n across structural thresholds.\n Regions of high $B_{\\mathrm{th}}$ emphasize stringent crystallinity criteria,\n while low thresholds capture more weakly ordered states.\n The data in the $\\kappa =0$ plane coincide, identically, with those found when using the conventional (i.e., non heavy tailed) Lowe-Andersen thermostat.\n }\n \\label{fig:Pcryst_3D_surface}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Excess Kurtosis and Suppression of Crystallization}\n\\label{sec:2.4}\n\nWe now examine how the momentum or, equivalently, the velocity-space broadening affects structural\noutcomes. Across $\\sim$ 100 independent 3D supercooling runs for 3 different quenching schemes each. The number of particles $N=1500$, the time step $dt=0.004$, mass of the particles set to $m=1$, the Boltzmann constant $k_{B}=1$, the density $\\rho=1.1$, and the Lennard-Jones potential coefficients $\\bar{b}=1$, $U=1$ all in natural MD units. The degree of polydispersity in the potential being $8\\%$. The only control variable in our calculations was the strength of\nnon-equilibrium velocity sampling introduced by the thermostat.\n\nProviding the average over a hundred runs, Figure~\\ref{fig:cum_pcryst_combined} depicts the cumulative probability $P(\\mathrm{ordered} \\mid \\kappa' \\ge \\kappa)$ that the cooled system develops a sufficient degree of local order (i.e., that its bond orientational order parameter exceeds a minimal threshold value $B^*$) given that the excess kurtosis of the velocity was larger than $\\kappa$. As is readily seen, when an excess kurtosis of $\\kappa \\sim 0.15$ is achieved, the probability of crystallization decreases sharply.\nIn fig.~\\ref{fig:cum_pcryst_combined},\nthe lower cutoff on the local bond orientation order $B^* = 0.25$ was chosen so as to have maximum contrast between systems enjoying a higher degree of local order than those that do not. Fig.~\\ref{fig:Pcryst_3D_surface} shows the variation of the cumulative distribution for local bond orientational order over the full range of $B^*$ values that we examined. The use of threshold values of $B^*$ is not common practice in the literature; earlier investigations, e.g., ~\\cite{Lechner2008,tenWolde1996} similarly sought to determine optimal threshold values on the local bond orientational order parameter and its generalization to best delineate between crystalline and supercooled states. All of the data points collected in Figs. \\ref{fig:cum_pcryst_combined} and \\ref{fig:Pcryst_3D_surface} are for supercooled fluid systems. For crystalline systems (inasmuch as crystallinity can be inferred in the simulated polydisperse systems), the local bond orientational order parameter was sizable (of values $B \\gtrsim 0.7$ similar to those shown for the orange curve in Fig. \\ref{fig:combined_kurtosis_structure} (b)). The trend that we find with increasing values of $\\kappa$ indicates that broader velocity distributions actively suppress structural ordering.\nIntermittent high velocity excursions disrupt coherent particle rearrangements required for nucleation,\nmaintaining configurational disorder even at identical mean temperatures.\n\nComplementary spatial diagnostics reinforce this conclusion.\nWe contrast the coarse grained potential energy landscapes\nfor stochastic versus equilibrium thermostats.\nSupercooled runs exhibit pronounced spatial heterogeneity,\nwhile equilibrium crystallization produces uniform,\nlow-energy domains. The effect persists across system sizes ranging from 1500 to 10000 particles and is robust under periodic boundary conditions, indicating that it is not an artifact of finite size or rigid walls. We note in this connection that, when a rigid (rather than periodic) boundary condition is used, natural crystallization is predominantly nucleated at the walls of the system, producing an uneven radial distribution of the structural variables; this was the practical reason for adopting conventional periodic boundary conditions throughout. The wall-nucleation effect persists even when the system size is increased by an order of magnitude (the particle number was varied between $1500$ and $12000$). While this is a genuine finite-size effect caused by the rigid boundaries, it is also a clear illustration of the system exhibiting radically different structural outcomes for two different thermostatting protocols at the same nominal temperature. \nThere is additional evidence suggesting the dependence of the\nblock-averaged structural relaxation time $\\langle \\tau_{\\alpha} \\rangle$\non the excess velocity kurtosis $\\kappa$. We can see emergence of positive correlation: as $\\kappa$ increases,\n$\\langle \\tau_{\\alpha} \\rangle$ systematically grows.\nIn particular, beyond $\\kappa \\gtrsim 0.2$ the increase becomes sharper, indicating that progressively heavier-tailed\nvelocity statistics are accompanied by a marked slowing down of\n$\\alpha$-relaxation dynamics.\nSince larger $\\kappa$ quantifies stronger deviations from a Maxwellian\nvelocity distribution, this result demonstrates that non-Gaussian\nfluctuations in the kinetic sector couple directly to long time\nstructural relaxation in the supercooled regime. A complementary discussion of the standard non-Gaussian parameter $\\alpha_2(t)$, its relation to the $\\alpha$-relaxation time $\\tau_\\alpha$, and the connection between dynamical heterogeneity and the crystallization time $\\tau_{\\mathrm{xtal}}$ is given in Appendix~\\ref{app:nongaussian}.\n\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n&& P(\\mathrm{ordered} \\mid \\kappa' \\ge \\kappa)\n:=\nP\\!\\left( B \\ge B^* \\;\\middle|\\; \\kappa' \\ge \\kappa \\right) \\nonumber\n\\\\ && =\n\\frac{\n\\sum\\limits_{r=1}^{N_{\\mathrm{runs}}}\n\\Theta\\!\\left(B_r - B^*\\right)\n\\Theta\\!\\left(\\kappa'_r - \\kappa\\right)\n}{\n\\sum\\limits_{r=1}^{N_{\\mathrm{runs}}}\n\\Theta\\!\\left(\\kappa'_r - \\kappa\\right)\n},\n\\end{eqnarray}\nwhere $\\Theta(\\cdot)$ denotes the Heaviside step function that is equal to unity when its argument is positive and is zero for negative arguments. \n\n\\section{ Determining Temperature Distributions From Single Particle Velocities}\n\\label{sec:ilt}\n\\label{cpt2}\n\nThe velocity distributions discussed in the last chapter allow for much more than merely observing that the steady state dynamics are non-Maxwellian. With their aid, we can infer the distribution of effective equilibrium temperatures that describe the nearly stationary supercooled state.\n\nThe velocity degrees of freedom do not fully equilibrate before structural arrest/crystallization in deeply supercooled systems. Figs. \\ref{fig:cum_pcryst_120} and \\ref{fig:Pcryst_3D_surface} demonstrate that excess kurtosis remains finite in the metastable supercooled state and does not relax to zero prior to crystallization (the underlying non-Gaussian dynamics, dynamical heterogeneity, and crystallization are reviewed in Appendix~\\ref{app:nongaussian}). The thermostats that we employ emulate a supercooled system with self-consistent finite excess kurtosis. This establishes that non-Gaussian velocity statistics are an intrinsic and persistent feature of the supercooled state on physically relevant timescales.\n\nA central result of a phase space formulation of the long lived nearly stationary state concerns a universality that allows for predictions. \n\nWe reiterate and underscore that this universality is not an assumption but rather a consequence of the theorem of Ref. \\cite{Nussinov2024} (Appendix \\ref{app:theorem}). Specifically, in any system for which the canonical and microcanonical ensemble descriptions coincide, the reduced few body local density of an arbitrary stationary state (including, trivially, the equilibrium states themselves) is a weighted superposition of the respective reduced few body local equilibrium probability densities when the latter are summed over varying values of the state variables. Such ensemble equivalence is satisfied by a broad class of disorder-free Hamiltonians. This includes, notably, supercooled liquids and their crystalline and liquid counterparts~\\cite{Nussinov2024}. Thus, for these systems, the few body correlations of \\emph{any} stationary state are fully encoded by thermal equilibrium. In particular, within the stationary state, the long time local reduced $n$-body probability density (with the particle number $n$ being of order unity) at inverse temperature $\\beta$, chemical potential $\\mu$, and any other state variables is a weighted superposition of reduced probability densities of the equilibrium system \\cite{Nussinov2024} at effective inverse temperatures $\\beta'$, chemical potentials $\\mu'$, etc. That is, \n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{eq:localP}\n\\begin{split}\n\\rho_{{\\sf stationary},n}(\\beta, \\mu, \\ldots)\n= \\int d\\beta'\\, d\\mu' \\cdots \\\\\nP(\\beta, \\mu, \\ldots \\mid \\beta', \\mu', \\ldots)\\;\n\\rho_{{\\sf eq.},n}(\\beta', \\mu', \\ldots)\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\n\nIn general, an additional contribution arises from the phase-coexistence regime where the energy density and number density may vary continuously at fixed thermodynamic fields $\\beta',\\mu', \\ldots$ \\cite{Nussinov2024}; the full expression including this coexistence region is given in Eq.~(\\ref{central-theorem}) of Appendix \\ref{app:theorem}. The normalized weight $P$ acts as a \\emph{spectral decomposition over equilibria}. This transforms the problem of characterizing complex non-equilibrium and metastable structures into one governed entirely by equilibrium statistical mechanics. Given the form of Eq. (\\ref{eq:localP}) for the reduced local probability density, predictions can be made for numerous local observables if $P$ were known. We return to a central point underlying our work: the single particle velocity distributions allow for an extraction of the dependence of probability kernel $P$ on the effective inverse temperature $\\beta'$ in a manner that is completely {\\it independent} of the specific details of the system such as the potential energy describing the interactions between its constituents, details of chemical composition, and all structural facets. Theoretically, given the single particle velocity distribution over all velocities, one could infer $P(\\beta|\\beta')$ uniquely via a simple inverse Laplace transform. We turn to this aspect next.\n\n\\subsection{Theoretical Framework}\n\nWe briefly return to the theoretical framework of Ref. \\cite{Nussinov2024} and focus on temperature fluctuations. As repeatedly emphasized above, in all classical equilibrium systems the velocities follow a Maxwellian distribution which is set solely by the temperature and no other equilibrium state variables. This implies that the probability distribution for Cartesian velocity components of a nearly stationary system at nominal inverse temperature \\( \\beta \\) can be written as a convex hull average of Maxwellians at effective equilibrium inverse temperatures \\( \\beta' \\) of the equilibrium system \\cite{Nussinov2024},\n\\begin{equation}\nP(|v_x|)\n=\n\\sqrt{\\frac{2m}{\\pi}}\n\\int_0^\\infty d\\beta'\\;\n\\beta'^{1/2}\n\\exp\\!\\left(- \\frac{m \\beta' v_x^2}{2}\\right)\n\\, P(\\beta \\mid \\beta').\n\\label{eq:pvx_mixture}\n\\end{equation}\nUpon defining the Laplace transform variable\n$s := \\frac{m v_x^2}{2}$,\nEq.~\\eqref{eq:pvx_mixture} immediately reads\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\label{eq:pvx_laplace}\n&& P(\\lvert v_x \\rvert)\n=\n\\sqrt{\\frac{2m}{\\pi}}\n\\int_0^\\infty d\\beta'\\,\ne^{-s\\beta'}\\ g(\\beta'),\\nonumber\n\\\\ &&\ng(\\beta') := \\beta'^{1/2} P(\\beta \\mid \\beta').\n\\end{eqnarray}\nPerforming an inverse Laplace transform with respect to \\(s\\) therefore yields\n\\begin{equation}\nP(\\beta \\mid \\beta')\n=\n\\sqrt{\\frac{\\pi}{2m}}\\,\n\\beta'^{-1/2}\\,\n\\mathcal{L}^{-1}_{s\\to\\beta'}\n\\!\\left[\nP(|v_x|)\\Big|_{v_x=\\sqrt{2s/m}}\n\\right].\n\\label{eq:inv_laplace_beta_prime}\n\\end{equation}\nThis formulation provides a direct method\nto extract the effective inverse-temperature weighting kernel \\(P(\\beta \\mid \\beta')\\) from the measured\nvelocity distribution \\(P(|v_x|)\\).\nA practical implementation of this inversion and its comparison to measured \\(P(v_x)\\) is shown in Figs.~\\ref{fig:Pbeta_combined} and \\ref{fig:bessel_high_kurt}. Although the single particle distribution $P(\\vec{v})$ is rotationally invariant, it is not a product of independent Cartesian-component distributions. This non-factorizability of the non-Maxwellian velocity distribution is deeply related to the constrained correlated dynamics in the supercooled liquid (Appendix \\ref{app:correlated}).\n\n\\subsection{Numerical Inverse Laplace Transform via the Cohen Algorithm}\n\nIn practice, in order to extract $P(\\beta \\mid \\beta')$, we will numerically invert the\nLaplace transform relating $P(|v_x|)$ to the rescaled function\n$g(\\beta') = \\beta'^{1/2} P(\\beta \\mid \\beta')$.\nBecause numerical Laplace inversion is exponentially ill-conditioned, we employ the Cohen algorithm~\\cite{Cohen2007}, which is based on a\nFourier--series representation of the Bromwich integral with controlled\nconvergence acceleration. In this method, the inverse transform is\napproximated as\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n&& g(\\beta')\n\\approx\n\\frac{e^{A_{cohen}/2}}{2\\beta'}\n\\sum_{k=0}^{N}\n(-1)^k \\, c_k \\,\n\\Re\\!\\left[\n\\tilde{P}(s_k)\n\\right], \\nonumber\n\\\\ \\quad\n&& s_k = \\frac{A_{cohen} + i\\pi k}{2\\beta'},\n\\end{eqnarray}\nwhere $\\tilde{P}(s)$ denotes the Laplace-domain function obtained from\n$P(|v_x|)$ after removing the prefactor $\\sqrt{2m/\\pi}$ and substituting\n$v_x = \\sqrt{2s/m}$. The parameter $A_{cohen}>0$ controls numerical stability,\n$N$ is the truncation order, and $c_k$ are Cohen acceleration coefficients\nthat suppress truncation error. The parameters $(A_{cohen},N)$ are chosen such\nthat convergence is achieved within the statistical uncertainty of the\nmeasured velocity histogram.\n\nIn practice, we first smoothen $P(|v_x|)$ using spline interpolation to\nobtain a continuous representation and then evaluate the transform at the\ncomplex arguments required by the algorithm. The recovered function\n$g(\\beta')$ is subsequently rescaled according to\n$P(\\beta \\mid \\beta') = \\beta'^{-1/2} g(\\beta')$\nand normalized to satisfy\n$\\int_0^{\\infty} P(\\beta \\mid \\beta') \\, d\\beta' = 1$.\nOnce $P(\\beta|\\beta')$ is known, we can determine numerous quantities for which the temperature is the prominent governing state variable of the supercooled fluid, including the viscosity as a function of temperature.\n\n\\subsection{Gamma-Distributed Effective Temperature}\n\nA fundamental result of equilibrium statistical mechanics is that the maximization of the entropy subject to the condition of a given mean energy yields the canonical ensemble probability distribution with the inverse temperature serving as the Lagrange multiplier enforcing that constraint \\cite{Jaynes1957}. The supercooled liquid\nis not described by the canonical ensemble probability density with the system Hamiltonian. The canonical density built from the system Hamiltonian at a temperature below melting describes the equilibrium \\emph{solid}, not the supercooled fluid, and the supercooled liquid simply does not have ``sufficient time'' to reach this global equilibrium state. Under rapid supercooling, different local regions of the system instead ``manage'' to equilibrate and maximize the entropy locally to varying temperatures, so that a vanishing variance of the effective temperatures $T'$ would correspond to the canonical density of the equilibrium solid rather than to the supercooled fluid. Instead, the supercooled liquid may only achieve a maximum entropy state\nwith a finite variance of the effective equilibrium temperatures $T'$. We thus seek the distribution $P(T|T')$ having a maximal Shannon entropy subject to: fixed average $\\int_0^\\infty T' P(T|T') dT' = T$; fixed finite standard deviation; support restricted to positive temperatures; and continuous vanishing at zero.\n\nMaximizing the Shannon entropy\n${\\sf H} = - \\frac{1}{\\ln 2} \\int_0^\\infty P(T|T') \\ln P(T|T') \\, dT'$\nsubject to the above constraints yields a Gamma distribution, \n\\begin{equation}\nP(T|T')\n=\n\\frac{(T{'})^{{\\sf A}-1}}{\\Gamma({\\sf A})\\,{\\sf B}^{{\\sf A}}}\\,\n\\exp\\!\\left(-\\frac{T'}{\\sf{B}}\\right),\n\\qquad T'>0 .\n\\label{eq:gamma_T}\n\\end{equation}\nThe two lowest cumulants of the distribution are\n$\\langle T^{'}\\rangle = {\\sf A B}$,\n$\\mathrm{Var}(T^{'})={\\sf A B}^{2}$,\nand the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean is a constant,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\frac{\\sigma_{T^{'}}}{\\langle T^{'}\\rangle}=\\frac{1}{\\sqrt{{\\sf{A}}}} := \\overline{A}.\n\\label{eq:gamma_moments}\n\\end{equation}\nThus ${\\sf B}$ sets the temperature scale, while ${\\sf A}$ controls the relative width of the distribution and quantifies the degree of thermal heterogeneity. In the limit ${\\sf{A}}\\to\\infty$ at fixed mean temperature, the distribution collapses to\n$P(T|T')\\to\\delta(T-T')$, corresponding to the equilibrium system.\nThe quality of the Gamma fit is demonstrated in Fig.~\\ref{fig:pvx}. Taken together, Figs.~\\ref{fig:pvx} and \\ref{fig:bessel_high_kurt} show that the Gamma form captures the high-energy (large $T'$) tail of $P(T|T')$ (which dominates the non-equilibrium, fluid-like contributions to averages such as the viscosity) more faithfully than the low-$T'$ (slower particle) region.\n\n\\begin{figure}[tbp]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{PTgamma.png}\n \\caption[$P(T|T')$ Gamma fit]{ The Gamma distribution fit for the supercooled liquid temperature distribution \\(P(T|T')\\).}\n \\label{fig:pvx}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\paragraph{Inverse temperature distribution.}\nTransforming to the inverse temperature $\\beta=1/T$ yields\n\\begin{equation}\nP(\\beta|\\beta')\n=\n\\frac{\\beta'^{({\\sf{A}}+1)}}{\\Gamma({\\sf{A}})\\,{\\sf{B}}^{{\\sf{A}}}}~\ne^{-1/{({\\sf{B}}\\beta')}},\n\\label{eq:inv_gamma_beta}\n\\end{equation}\nan inverse--Gamma distribution in $\\beta'$.\n\n\\subsection{Velocity Distribution with Gamma Temperature Prior}\n\nWhen $P(T|T')$ is chosen to be a Gamma distribution,\n\\begin{equation}\nP_T(v_{ix})\n=\n\\int_{0}^{\\infty}\n\\sqrt{\\frac{m_i}{2\\pi T'}}\\,\n\\exp\\!\\left(-\\frac{m_i v_{ix}^2}{2 T'}\\right)\\,\nP(T|T')\\, dT' .\n\\label{eq:PTv_gamma_def}\n\\end{equation}\nSubstituting Eq.~\\eqref{eq:gamma_T} and employing\n$s = m_i v_{ix}^2/(2)$, the integral can be evaluated analytically using\nstandard Bessel function identities:\n\\begin{equation}\nP_T(v_{ix})\n=\n\\sqrt{\\frac{m_i}{2\\pi}}\\;\n\\frac{2}{\\Gamma({\\sf A})\\,{\\sf B}^{\\sf A}}\\,\n(s {\\sf B})^{\\frac{{\\sf A}-\\frac{1}{2}}{2}}\\,\nK_{{\\sf A}-\\frac{1}{2}}\\!\\left(2\\sqrt{\\frac{s}{{\\sf B}}}\\right).\n\\label{eq:PTv_gamma_closed}\n\\end{equation}\nHere, $K_\\nu(z)$ is the modified Bessel function of the second kind.\nIn the equilibrium limit ${\\sf A}\\to\\infty$ with ${\\sf AB}=T$, the mixture collapses to\nthe Maxwell--Boltzmann distribution. For small $\\overline{A} \\ll 1$, the Gamma distribution becomes a Gaussian,\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\label{approxGauss}\nP(T|T') \\approx \\frac{1}{T \\overline{A}\\sqrt{2\\pi} } \\exp\\left[-\\frac{1}{2} \\left(\\frac{T' - T}{T \\overline{A}} \\right)^2 \\right].\n\\end{eqnarray}\nBeyond the maximum entropy motivation \\cite{Jaynes1957} for the Gamma distribution form of $P(T|T')$, there is a further practical benefit to this choice over other distributions that behave similarly near their peak (for example a log-normal distribution in $T'$): unlike a log-normal prior, the Gamma prior leads to the closed-form expression of Eq.~\\eqref{eq:PTv_gamma_closed}, which is particularly convenient for analytical analysis and parameter fitting.\n\nThe discriminating physical information, however, lies in the high-$T'$ tail rather than at the peak, since it is the weight at $T'>T_m$ that controls the equilibrium-fluid-like (e.g.\\ viscous) contributions to averages performed with Eq.~(\\ref{eq:localP}). To probe this directly we refit the candidate families \\{Normal, Lognormal, Gamma\\} using only the tail region $T'>T_m=0.7$. In this restricted domain the Gamma fit yields the smallest residual (root-mean-square error, RMSE), indicating that it most accurately captures the melting-side tail shape, although the differences between the functional forms are not large. \nThe normal and log-normal fits feature standard deviations $\\sigma_{T'}$ similar to that of the Gamma distribution, $\\sigma_{T'}\\approx\\overline{A}\\,T$. That is, the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean of the effective temperatures is the same fixed, temperature independent dimensionless constant $\\overline{A}$ while the long high $T'$ tail of $P(T|T')$ emulates that of an inverse-Gamma distribution. This tail only comparison is shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:tail_fits_rmse}.\n\n\\begin{figure}[tbp]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{TailFits_RMSE.png}\n \\caption[$P(T|T')$ 3 fits comparison]{Tail only fits for $T'>T_m=0.7$. Curves show least-squares fits of Gamma, Normal, and Lognormal models to $P(T\\mid T')$ restricted to the high-$T'$ region. Legend labels report the RMSE values computed on the tail window: Gamma (0.0413), Normal (0.0494), Lognormal (0.0573).}\n \\label{fig:tail_fits_rmse}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Relating $\\overline{A}$ to Velocity Kurtosis}\n\nGiven Eqs. (\\ref{eq:pvx_mixture},\\ref{eq:inv_gamma_beta}),\n\\begin{equation}\n \\langle v_x^2 \\rangle\n = \\frac{1}{m} \\left\\langle\\frac{1}{\\beta^{'}} \\right\\rangle,~~\n \\langle v_x^4 \\rangle\n = \\frac{3}{m^2} \\left\\langle \\frac{1}{(\\beta^{'})^2} \\right\\rangle.\n \\end{equation}\nBecause the velocity distribution at each effective temperature is Maxwellian, $\\langle v_x^4\\rangle_{T'}=3\\langle v_x^2\\rangle_{T'}^2$; averaging over $P(T|T')$ then gives the kurtosis in closed form,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{ksim}\n k := \\frac{\\langle v_x^4\\rangle}{\\langle v_x^2\\rangle^2}= 3\\,\\frac{\\langle T'^2\\rangle}{\\langle T'\\rangle^2}= 3\\left(1+\\overline{A}^2\\right),\n\\end{equation}\nso that the excess kurtosis $\\kappa:=k-3$ is given by \nEq. (\\ref{eq:kappa_Abar}). Only the first two moments of $P(T|T')$ enter, so Eq.~(\\ref{eq:kappa_Abar}) is exact and independent of the shape of the distribution; it fixes the relative variance of the effective-temperature distribution directly from the measured kurtosis, with no reference to the microscopic interactions.\nBoth the direct fitting of $P(\\beta|\\beta')$ and using Eq.~(\\ref{ksim}) to approximately compute $\\overline{A}$ from the kurtosis yield values that are very close to each other (up to relative corrections of 0.1 or raw changes in the values of $\\overline{A}$ that are $\\sim 0.01$). Furthermore, the error bars in computing $\\kappa$ are themselves $\\sim 0.01$. These error bars are many standard deviations below the finite $\\kappa$ values that we find. Thus, our measured deviations from Maxwellian velocity statistics are not an artifact of statistical noise.\n\n\\subsection{Statistical Interpretation of the Tail Area and its Connection to Relaxation Slowdown}\n\nAt temperatures $T^{'} > T_{m}$, the local reduced few body probability density $\\rho_{{\\sf eq.},n}(\\beta', \\ldots)$ in Eq. (\\ref{eq:localP}) is that of an equilibrium fluid above its melting temperature. Within the equilibrium liquid,\nlong time hydrodynamic flow may occur. By contrast, in the equilibrium solid, such dynamics are not possible \\cite{sausset}. Thus, we define the\n\\emph{high temperature tail area} $\\mathcal{A}(T>T_m)$ as the integrated probability mass of the\neffective temperature distribution above the melting point:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\mathcal{A}(T'>T_m) := \\int_{T_m}^{\\infty} P(T|T')\\, dT'.\n\\label{eq:tail_area_def}\n\\end{equation}\nFigure~\\ref{fig:PT_tail_T06} illustrates this construction for a representative supercooled liquid at mean temperature $T=0.6$. The vertical dashed line marks the melting temperature $T_m$, and the shaded region above it is the high temperature tail whose area quantifies the excess non-equilibrium population above the melting threshold.\nWe consider the\n\\emph{inverse tail area}, $\\mathcal{A}^{-1}(T'>T_m)$, as a statistical proxy for the shear viscosity,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\eta(T) \\; \\simeq \\; \\frac{\\eta_{\\sf eq.}(T_{m}^{+})}{\\mathcal{A}(T'>T_m)}.\n\\label{eq:eta_tail_relation}\n\\end{equation}\nEquation~(\\ref{eq:eta_tail_relation}) is obtained from the Stokes relation. In Refs.~\\cite{grant16,grant15,preprint6,preprint2,Nussinov2024} the viscosity is read from the terminal velocity of an infinitesimal sphere released into the liquid under a uniform gravitational field, which by Stokes' law is inversely proportional to $\\eta$. Only regions whose effective temperature places them in the equilibrium fluid ($T'>T_{m})$ contribute to this flow. In an equilibrium solid the terminal velocity vanishes: a solid below its liquidus does not generate a drag that grows with velocity~\\cite{sausset}, and although defects such as diffusing vacancies and gliding dislocations permit activated, plastic relaxation above a yield stress, they do not sustain continuous viscous flow under an infinitesimal stress. Where static crystalline domains coexist with fluid ones, the solid fraction forms a load-bearing skeleton with a finite yield stress, so infinitesimal stresses again drive no steady flow and the sphere does not fall. Averaging the terminal velocity over the effective-temperature distribution of Eq.~(\\ref{eq:localP}) therefore retains only the weight above the liquidus, the high temperature tail area $\\mathcal{A}(T'>T_m)$m and yields Eq.~(\\ref{eq:eta_tail_relation}), the equilibrium liquidus being the sole surviving temperature scale (Appendix \\ref{app:theorem}). \n\nAs the system temperature $T$ is supercooled below $T_m$, the weight associated with effective temperatures $T'$ that are larger than $T_{m}$ decreases sharply. This rapid decrease reflects the dominance of dynamically arrested regions as the temperature is lowered. The rapid growth of relaxation times with decreasing temperature makes a direct determination of the viscosity at low temperatures computationally prohibitive~\\cite{HansenMcDonald}. We employed the VFT fit to extrapolate the inverse tail area to low temperatures. The computed viscosity was obtained directly from non-equilibrium MD using the SLLOD algorithm (Appendix \\ref{app:sllod}). Fig. \\ref{fig:InvTailArea_VFTfit} illustrates that the rise of the computed viscosity with decreasing temperature is approximately consistent with the VFT fit \\cite{bib:vft,bib:vft2,bib:vft3} of Eq. (\\ref{eq:VFT_law}). The above results constitute a consistency test of Eq. (\\ref{eq:eta_tail_relation}). The viscosity data points in Fig.~\\ref{fig:InvTailArea_VFTfit} and the temperature distributions and tail areas in Figs.~\\ref{fig:Pbeta_combined} and \\ref{fig:PT_and_tail_area} were all computed for the same supercooled polydisperse Kob-Andersen Lennard--Jones liquid of excess kurtosis $\\kappa=0.3$ (i.e.,\\ an effective width $\\overline{A}=\\sqrt{\\kappa/3}\\approx0.316$). We chose this larger $\\kappa=0.3$ value specifically because its tail-area curve is more sizable than for smaller $\\kappa$ and thus easier to track. The comparison between the kurtosis derived width and the independently measured SLLOD viscosity introduces no adjustable parameters tying the two together. \n\nAs noted in Eq. (\\ref{approxGauss}), for $\\overline{A} \\ll 1$, Eq.~(\\ref{eq:eta_tail_relation}) may be approximated by\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\label{eq:visc1}\n\\eta(T) \\simeq \\frac{\\eta(T^+_{\\sf melt})}{{\\sf erfc} (\\frac{T_{\\sf melt} - T}{\\overline{A}T \\sqrt{2}})},\n\\end{eqnarray}\nwith ${\\sf erfc}(z)$ denoting the complementary error function. \n\nWe stress that in the above simulation comparison in which $\\overline{A} \\sim 0.3$, the results plotted in Fig.~\\ref{fig:InvTailArea_VFTfit}) were computed with the \\emph{exact} tail-area relation Eq.~(\\ref{eq:eta_tail_relation}), the integrated high-$T'$ probability mass itself, rather than the $overline{A} \\ll 1$ approximation of Eq.~(\\ref{eq:visc1}). In fitting to experiments (Fig. \\ref{Collapse.}), one typically finds $\\overline{A} \\ll 1$ \\cite{grant15,preprint2}. For the few strongly broadened glass formers, e.g.,\\ $\\overline{A}\\simeq0.234$ for Zr$_{57}$Ni$_{43}$, the exact relation Eq.~(\\ref{eq:eta_tail_relation}) is the form to use although in the latter case, the fit was still performed with Eq. (\\ref{eq:visc1}). Averaging over all of fitted fluids in Fig. (\\ref{Collapse.}), the mean liquid dependent dimensionless parameter $\\overline{A}$ is $0.08$ with a standard deivation of $0.03$. We underscore that these fits contain \\emph{two} material parameters: the experimentally measured high temperature liquidus (melting) scale $T_l\\approx T_m$ entering Eq.~(\\ref{eq:visc1}) and the fitted dimensionless width $\\overline{A}$. Both are required to reproduce the measured viscosities across all tested liquids, including those with varying degrees of compositional mixing among their constituents. \n\nEmpirically, the same width $\\overline{A}$ appears to be consistent with more than the temperature dependence of the viscosity alone. Because the distribution of the effective local temperatures $T^{'}$ has standard deviation $\\sigma_{T_g}\\simeq\\overline{A}\\,T_g$ at the glass transition, the hysteresis of the fixed pressure specific heat measured on heating and cooling through $T_g$ is predicted to span a window $\\Delta T_h\\approx2\\sigma_{T_g}\\approx2\\overline{A}\\,T_g$~\\cite{Nussinov2024,preprint6}. For the four glass formers whose viscosity fits supply $\\overline{A}$ (OTP, glycerol, salol, and TNB), published calorimetric data give the dimensionless ratio $\\Delta T_h/(2\\overline{A}\\,T_g)\\approx0.92\\pm0.08$, qualitatively consistent with the predicted value of unity~\\cite{Nussinov2024,preprint6}. As is seen in the 45 liquid collapse of Fig. \\ref{Collapse.}~\\cite{grant15,preprint2}, there are a few outliers that do not conform well to Eq. (\\ref{eq:visc1}) Glycerol is a notable outlier in this collapse of and its specific heat likewise departs from that of other supercooled liquids; the latter feature has been suggested as evidence for a ``liquid--liquid'' transition~\\cite{AngellheatE}. Other departures from the collapse include Vit1 and trehalose and SiO$_2$, an archetypal extremely ``strong'' glass former (in Angell's classification \\cite{bib:angell}). Our simulations for the model polydisperse Kob-Andersen type system yield values of $\\overline{A}$ consistent in magntiude to those found in experiment ~\\cite{grant15,preprint2}. In our simulations the accessible non-equilibrium steady states extend from $\\kappa=0$ up to a stability ceiling at excess kurtosis $\\kappa\\approx0.3$ (equivalently a width $\\overline{A}=\\sqrt{\\kappa/3}\\approx0.316$); larger values are associated with an inability to achieve a stable steady state).\n\nThe stochastic thermostats give access to an entire \\emph{spectrum} of steady state kurtosis values rather than a single one. For the Two-Bath thermostat, this spectrum is bounded above by $\\kappa\\simeq 0.3$: below this value the system reaches a well-defined non-equilibrium steady state (and the stationarity assumptions underlying our analysis hold), whereas above $\\kappa\\simeq0.3$ those stationarity assumptions begin to break down and a stable steady state can no longer be maintained. The upper bound value of $\\kappa\\simeq0.3$ constitutes a \\emph{stability ceiling}, i.e., it is the largest non-Gaussianity that can be stably sustained. We emphasize that this upper bound is \\emph{not} a value to which the steady state is pinned. The supercooled system supports a stable steady state at \\emph{any} kurtosis below this threshold- the thermostats can realize the whole range $0<\\kappa\\lesssim0.3$. We further find values of $\\overline{A}$ within this range which are similar in magnitude to those in the data collapse of Fig. (\\ref{Collapse.}).\n\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[tbp]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{AT.png}\n \\caption[Tail Area Intro.]{\n Probability distribution $P(T|T')$ for the supercooled liquid at a mean temperature $T=0.6$, fitted with a Gamma distribution.\n The vertical dashed line indicates the melting temperature $T_m$, and the shaded region corresponds to the high temperature tail $T^\\prime>T_m$.\n The area of this region quantifies the excess non-equilibrium population above the melting threshold.}\n \\label{fig:PT_tail_T06}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.49\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{PTcomparison.png}\n \\label{fig:Pbeta_comparison}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.49\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{PabsVx.png}\n \\label{fig:Pbeta_lognorm}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption[Inverse Laplace for two $P(v_x)$ distributions]{\n (a) Probability distribution \\(P(T|T')\\) obtained via inverse Laplace transformation of \\(P(v_x)\\) using the Cohen algorithm, comparing equilibrium (blue) and supercooled (yellow) states.\n (b) Corresponding Normalized probability distributions \\( P(|v_x|) \\) vs \\( |v_x| \\) from an MD simulation of a supercooled liquid with Cumulative Kurtosis values $\\kappa = 0.02,0.3$. Blue curve is from a supercooled liquid while the yellow stands for an equilibrium crystal.}\n \\label{fig:Pbeta_combined}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure}[tbp]\n\\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{PVxgamma.png}\n \\caption[$P(|V_x|)$ comparison]{\n Comparison between the extracted velocity probability density $P(|v_x|)$ from raw data (red dots) to the distribution reconstructed from the Laplace transform of the Gamma distribution $P(T|T')$ of Eq. (\\ref{eq:gamma_T}) (continuous blue curve). The agreement demonstrates the quality of the gamma fit (Eq. (\\ref{eq:PTv_gamma_closed})). For the computation of the viscosity, the nontrivial high velocity (effective high $T'$) tail is of greater importance than the peak $v_x=0$ value. The sample shown here is at mean temperature $T=0.34$, which lies below the glass transition temperature $T_g\\simeq0.4$. Our effective Gamma distribution $P(T|T')$ fit forms indeed appear to extend to low temperatures. \n }\n \\label{fig:bessel_high_kurt}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{InvTailArea_VFTfit.png}\n \\caption[VFT]{\n Comparison between the reciprocal of the high temperature tail area of Eq. (\\ref{eq:eta_tail_relation}) extracted from the temperature distributions \\(P(T|T')\\), its respective VFT fit approximation (Eq. (\\ref{eq:VFT_law})), and the numerically measured viscosity. As the probability weight above the melting temperature decreases, the reciprocal \\(1/\\mathcal{A}\\) increases in tandem with the rapid growth of viscosity captured by the phenomenological VFT law. The plotted viscosity points plotted were obtained, via the SLLOD algorithm, from the $\\kappa=0.3$ ($\\overline{A}\\approx0.316$) supercooled sample whose temperature distributions and tail areas appear in Figs.~\\ref{fig:Pbeta_combined} and \\ref{fig:PT_and_tail_area}.}\n \\label{fig:InvTailArea_VFTfit}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.49\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{PT.png}\n \\label{fig:PT_distributions}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.49\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{PT_tail_area.png}\n \\label{fig:PT_tail_area}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption[$\\mathcal{A}(T^{'}>T_{m})$ vs Temperature]{ Left - distributions $P(T|T^{'})$ with $T_m$ highlighted by a dotted line. Right - Corresponding area above\n melting, $\\mathcal{A}(T^{'}>T_{m})$, quantifying the fraction of probability mass of being above the equilibrium melting temperatures for each case.\n }\n\\label{fig:PT_and_tail_area}\n\\end{figure*}\n\nThe right panel of Fig.~\\ref{fig:PT_and_tail_area} shows a sigmoid like dependence of the excess tail area \\(\\mathcal{A}(T^{'} > T_{m})\\) on temperature. This smooth crossover spans the interval between the conventional melting temperature \\(T_m \\simeq 0.8\\) and the glass transition temperature \\(T_g \\simeq 0.4\\) for Lennard--Jones type systems. Importantly, the measured excess tail area arises exclusively from the non-equilibrium velocity distributions generated by the thermostat. In strict thermal equilibrium, velocity distributions are exactly Maxwellian, implying \\(\\mathcal{A}(T^{'} > T_{m})=0\\) at all temperatures. In that limit, the sigmoid like curve collapses to a step function at \\(T_m\\), thereby eliminating any sensitivity to \\(T_g\\) as a meaningful crossover scale.\n\n\\begin{figure*}\n\t\\centering\n\t\\includegraphics[width=1.9 \\columnwidth, height=1.3 \\textheight, keepaspectratio]{Universal_Collapse_Alt.jpg}\n\t\\caption[Viscosity]{\nReproduced from \\cite{grant15}. An empirical test of Eq.~(\\ref{eq:visc1}) across 45 supercooled liquids. Viscosities are scaled by the viscosity $\\eta(T_{l})$ at the liquidus temperature and plotted against the dimensionless variable $x := \\frac{T_{l} - T}{\\sqrt{2} \\overline{A} T}$. Data spanning silicate, metallic, and organic systems --- covering the full range of kinetic fragilities --- collapse onto a single universal curve over 16 decades, suggesting a universality among glassforming liquids. No conjectured temperatures (such as the VFT ideal glass transition fitting parameter $T_0$) appear. Rather the only temperature scale appearing in this collapse is the experimentally accessible, equilibrium liquidus temperature $T_{l}$.} \t\\label{Collapse.}\n\\end{figure*}\n\nConcurrent with the enhanced velocity fluctuations relative to those in the equilibrium system (with these broader fluctuations associated with a spread of temperatures $T'$), other fluctuations are present. Crystallization in supercooled systems may proceed \\cite{nucleation1,nucleation2} via correlated large scale fluctuations in which particles forming an entire shell simultaneously join a crystalline seed. \n\n\\chapter{The Methods Used}\n\n\\subsection{Simulation Parameters}\nWe performed MD supercooling simulations using a $6$--$12$ Lennard--Jones\ninteraction, while varying the thermostatting protocol employed in the system. To suppress\ncrystallization, a slight polydispersity was introduced in the Lennard--Jones length scale.\nThe pairwise interaction potential between particles $i$ and $j$ separated by a distance\n$r_{ij}$ is given by\n\\begin{equation}\n U_{ij}(r_{ij}) =\n 4 U\n \\left[\n \\left(\\frac{b_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\\right)^{12}\n -\n \\left(\\frac{b_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\\right)^{6}\n \\right],\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $U$ sets the interaction energy scale and $b_{ij}$ is an effective interaction length\ndefined from particle-specific size parameters $b_i$ and $b_j$ via the arithmetic\nmixing rule $b_{ij} = \\tfrac{1}{2}(b_i + b_j)$. The parameters $b_i$ are drawn from a Gaussian distribution centered around a mean value $\\bar{b}$, introducing a controlled level of\npolydispersity ($8$--$10\\%$) while preserving the overall Lennard--Jones form of the interaction.\n\nThe relevant base parameters for which most of our simulations were conducted are: the number of particles $N= 500$--$10000$, the time step $dt=0.004$, mass of the particles $m=1$, the Boltzmann constant $k_{B}=1$, the density $\\rho=1.1$, and the Lennard-Jones potential parameters: $U=1$ and mean $\\bar{b}=1$ over the polydisperse system.\n\nFigure ~\\ref{fig:Boo} demonstrates two contrasting states achieved from this system at $T=0.5$ with $8\\%$ polydispersity. It is integral for our study that the system is a near perfect crystal former ($B \\approx 0.8$) while also being able to reach supercooled states of negligible structure under specific thermostats and quenching schemes. The equations of motion were integrated using the standard Velocity Verlet\nalgorithm, which is symplectic and time-reversible to second order in\nthe time step $dt$. At each step the new particle positions are first determined from the current velocities and forces, after which the forces are recomputed and the velocities updated accordingly; this scheme ensures good energy stability even in the absence of a thermostat and provides a consistent framework for incorporating the various thermostatting protocols considered here.\n\n\\subsection{Structure, Intermediate Scattering and Local Potential Energy}\n\nThe structure parameter is calculated as the six-fold bond orientation order parameter as codified in the celebrated work by Steinhardt, Nelson, and Ronchetti \\cite{BOO}.\nFor each particle $i$, the complex bond-order coefficients are defined as\n\\begin{equation}\nq_{lm}(i) =\n\\frac{1}{N_b(i)}\n\\sum_{j \\in \\mathcal{N}(i)}\nY_{lm}\\!\\left(\\hat{r}_{ij}\\right),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $Y_{lm}$ are spherical harmonics of degree $l$,\n$\\hat{r}_{ij}$ is the normalized bond vector,\n$\\mathcal{N}(i)$ denotes the neighbor set, and $N_b(i)$ is the number of\nneighbors of particle $i$.\n\nWe focus on $l = 6$, which is particularly sensitive to crystalline\n(FCC/HCP) symmetry. The rotationally invariant scalar order parameter\nfor each particle is\n\\begin{equation}\nq_6(i) =\n\\left[\n\\frac{4\\pi}{2l+1}\n\\sum_{m=-l}^{l}\n\\left| q_{lm}(i) \\right|^2\n\\right]^{1/2}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nThe instantaneous average structural order over all particles is defined as\n\\begin{equation}\nB(t) =\n\\frac{1}{N}\n\\sum_{i=1}^{N}\nq_6(i,t).\n\\end{equation}\n\nThe self part of the intermediate scattering function $F(\\vec{q},t)$ is calculated as:\n\\begin{equation}\nF(\\vec{q},t) := \\frac{1}{N} \\sum_{i=1}^{N} e^{i\\vec{q} \\cdot (\\vec{r}_i(t)-\\vec{r}_j(0))}.\\end{equation}\n\nHere, $N$ is the number of MD particles, $\\vec{q}$ is the wave vector at which the intermediate scattering function is evaluated, $\\vec{r}_i$ is the location of the $i$-th particle and $t$ is the time. The magnitude of the pertinent wave number $q$ at which $F$ is evaluated is the one maximizing the structure factor $S(|\\vec{q}|=q)$ as seen for a crystal sample (Fig.~\\ref{fig:Structure_Factor}). Measurements of $F(q,t)$ evaluated at the wavenumber maximizing $S(q)$ are customarily employed to diagnose the stability and relaxation of the system~\\cite{Kob-Andersen}.\n\n\\begin{figure}[tbp]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{Isotropic_Sq.png}\n \\caption[S(q)]{The overlaid structure factors $S(q)$ of the supercooled liquid and of the crystalline system.}\n \\label{fig:Structure_Factor}\n\\end{figure}\n\nApart from computing $F(q,t)$, we also examined the distribution of the local potential energies of the liquid at various degrees of coarse-graining. The local potential energy is defined as follows:\n\\begin{equation}\nU_{j} := \\frac{1}{N_{j}} \\sum_{i=1}^{N_{j}}\\sum_{s=1}^{l} U_{is}( R_{is}).\n\\end{equation}\nHere, $U_{j}$ is the local potential energy of a smaller cell $j$ with $N_j$ being the number of particles in this cell, and $l$ is the number of neighbors of particle $i$. Examples of the resulting single particle potential energy spatial maps and distributions are compiled in Fig.~\\ref{fig:potential_4panel}.\n\nThe distributions in Fig.~\\ref{fig:potential_4panel} show that the\nstandard deviation of the single particle potential energy is\nnoticeably larger in the supercooled liquid than in the crystal:\n$\\sigma_U^{\\rm sc}/\\sigma_U^{\\rm eq} \\approx 1.08$ for the\n$\\overline{A} = 0.09$ system shown. This $8\\%$ excess is far larger\nthan what the thermal heterogeneity $\\overline{A}$ alone can produce,\nand its origin lies in the density fluctuations of\n$\\mathcal{P}_{\\rm config}$. The argument is straightforward.\nFor a single Cartesian kinetic-energy component\n$K_x = \\tfrac{1}{2}mv_x^2$, the equilibrium variance is\n$\\mathrm{Var}(K_x)_{\\rm eq} = T^2/2$ (in the Gaussian system,\n$\\langle v_x^4\\rangle = 3\\langle v_x^2\\rangle^2$).\nApplying the law of total variance with $P(T|T')$,\nthe excess variance in the supercooled state is\n$\\mathrm{Var}(K_x)_{\\rm sc} - \\mathrm{Var}(K_x)_{\\rm eq}\n= \\tfrac{3}{4}\\overline{A}^2 T^2$, giving a relative excess\nstandard deviation\n$(\\sigma_{K_x}^{\\rm sc} - \\sigma_{K_x}^{\\rm eq})/\\sigma_{K_x}^{\\rm eq}\n\\approx \\tfrac{3}{4}\\overline{A}^2 \\approx 0.6\\%$ for\n$\\overline{A} = 0.09$. No assumption about the interaction potential\nis needed; the same result follows directly from the measured kurtosis\n$\\kappa \\approx 3\\overline{A}^2$ via\n$(\\sigma_{K_x}^{\\rm sc} - \\sigma_{K_x}^{\\rm eq})/\\sigma_{K_x}^{\\rm eq}\n\\approx \\kappa/4$.\nFor the potential energy, the thermal contribution from harmonic\nfluctuations about the inherent-structure minima is identical to\nthe kinetic contribution. Since $U_x = \\frac{1}{2}kx^2$ with\n$x\\sim\\mathcal{N}(0,T'/k)$ has exactly the same form as $K_x$\n(both are $(T'/2)\\cdot Z^2$ with $Z\\sim\\mathcal{N}(0,1)$),\nthe law of total variance applied to $P(T|T')$ gives identically:\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n && \\frac{\\mathrm{Var}(U_x)_{\\rm sc} - \\mathrm{Var}(U_x)_{\\rm eq}}{\\mathrm{Var}(U_x)_{\\rm eq}}\n = \\frac{\\mathrm{Var}(K_x)_{\\rm sc} - \\mathrm{Var}(K_x)_{\\rm eq}}{\\mathrm{Var}(K_x)_{\\rm eq}} \\nonumber\n\\\\ && = \\tfrac{3}{2}\\overline{A}^2 = \\frac{\\kappa}{2}\\approx 1.2\\%.\n \\label{eq:rel_var_equal}\n\\end{eqnarray}\nThis thermal harmonic contribution to the relative variance excess\nof $U$ is directly readable from the measured velocity kurtosis\n$\\kappa$, with no assumption about the interaction potential.\nThe observed relative variance excess, $(\\sigma_U^{\\rm sc}/\\sigma_U^{\\rm eq})^2 - 1 \\approx 1.08^2 - 1 \\approx 16.6\\%$,\nis $\\sim\\!14$ times larger than this thermal prediction of $1.2\\%$.\nThe bulk ($\\approx 93\\%$) of the single particle potential energy\nvariance excess therefore arises not from thermal fluctuations about\nthe inherent-structure minima, but from the \\emph{spatial distribution\nof the minima themselves} --- i.e.\\ from the spread of\n$U_{\\rm min}$ values across different local regions of the\nsupercooled liquid encoded in $\\mathcal{P}_{\\rm config}$.\nThe steeply density-dependent LJ potential means that regions of\ndifferent local density $n'$ (Eq. (\\ref{eq:localP})) sit at substantially different\ninherent structure energies, contributing a term\n$\\sim(\\partial U_{\\rm min}/\\partial n')^2\\sigma_{n'}^2$\nto $\\mathrm{Var}(U)_{\\rm sc}$ that dominates the thermal term\nby an order of magnitude.\nThe excess $\\sigma_U$ is thus a direct signature of the\ndistribution of particle number densities/inherent structure minima across the spatially\nheterogeneous supercooled state.\n\n\n\\begin{figure*}[tbp]\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}{.5\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=.8\\linewidth]{Supercooled.png}\n \\caption{Bond order for the supercooled liquid}\n \\label{fig:boo_supercooled}\n \\end{subfigure}%\n \\begin{subfigure}{.5\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=.8\\linewidth]{Crystal.png}\n \\caption{Bond order for the crystal}\n \\label{fig:boo_crystal}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\vspace{0.5em}\n \\begin{subfigure}{.5\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=.8\\linewidth]{grsupercooled.png}\n \\caption{$g(r)$ for the supercooled liquid}\n \\label{fig:rdf_supercooled}\n \\end{subfigure}%\n \\begin{subfigure}{.5\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=.8\\linewidth]{grcrystal.png}\n \\caption{$g(r)$ for the crystal}\n \\label{fig:rdf_crystal}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption[Structure comparison]{\n Spatial distribution of local structural order and pair correlations for MD particles under different thermostatting conditions.\n \\textbf{Top:} bond orientational order illustrating suppressed crystallinity in the supercooled liquid (low collision-rate thermostat) and long range order in the crystal (Berendsen thermostat).\n \\textbf{Bottom:} Corresponding radial distribution functions $g(r)$, showing broadened and damped coordination shells in the supercooled state and sharp, long range oscillations characteristic of crystalline order.\n }\n \\label{fig:Boo}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[!t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}{.48\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=.9\\linewidth]{SupercooledPot.png}\n \\caption{Spatial map (supercooled)}\n \\label{fig:spatial_stoch}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}{.48\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=.9\\linewidth]{CrystalPot.png}\n \\caption{Spatial map (crystal)}\n \\label{fig:spatial_lang}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\vspace{0.6em}\n \\begin{subfigure}{.48\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=.9\\linewidth]{PotHistSupercooled.png}\n \\caption{Per-particle $U$ distribution (supercooled)}\n \\label{fig:hist_stoch}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}{.48\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=.9\\linewidth]{PotHistCystal.png}\n \\caption{Per-particle $U$ distribution (crystal)}\n \\label{fig:hist_lang}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption[Local energy comparison]{ Single particle potential energy in the supercooled and crystalline states under two thermostatting protocols. (a,b) Spatial distributions of per-particle potential energy for a noisy non-Gaussian (stochastic) thermostat (supercooled) and a Langevin thermostat (crystal). (c,d) Corresponding normalized per-particle potential-energy distributions, highlighting the sharper (narrower) energy distribution in the crystalline state. Notably, at the same nominal temperature the crystalline state exhibits a lower mean potential energy than the supercooled state.}\n \\label{fig:potential_4panel}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\n\\section{Conclusion}\n\nThe rich spatially nonuniform configuration space landscape of supercooled liquids has been studied for many decades by now. However, the momentum space distributions has been assumed to be canonical. We explored this unquestioned assumption. Our results hint at a possible self-consistent symmetric picture in which both the configurational potential and the kinetic energies differ from those in conventional equilibrium systems. Such deviations cannot be numerically probed with conventional thermostats that, by consruction, are guaranteed to generate Maxwellian velocity distributions. Towards this end, we constructed new thermostats. By systematically comparing continuous equilibrium thermostats with our collision based stochastic schemes, we demonstrated that non-Maxwellian velocity distributions may appear. The excess velocity kurtosis $\\kappa$ was introduced as a quantitative dimensionless deviation from Maxwellian statistics. Our studied stochastic collision-based thermostats sustain finite positive $\\kappa$, reflecting broadened velocity distributions. These results suggest a consistent link between momentum space broadening and structural evolution. Across extensive ensembles of supercooling runs, the probability of crystallization decreases monotonically with increasing $\\kappa$- wider velocity distributions systematically correlate with inhibited nucleation (Section \\ref{sec:2.4}). A non-Gaussian (including heavy tailed) bath generically which yields, as we find, a stationary velocity distribution with finite, nonzero kurtosis, is consistent with a nontrivial fixed-point property of the full coupled dynamics (so long as the supercooled system remains in a steady state prior to crystallization). Our findings of finite kurtosis and nontrivial velocity distributions in supercooled liquids are further consistent with similar trends in other arenas in which stochastic forcing and other effects yield non-Gaussian stationary distributions with persistent higher order moments (including kurtosis), e.g., \\cite{Yu2020,Kanazawa2015,Patron2021,Megias2022}. With no drift and leading to stationary averages, the bath may be regarded as part of the larger dynamical system, which self consistently determines the steady state ensemble.\nStarting from the single particle velocity distribution as a mixture of Maxwellians, we demonstrated how an effective temperature distribution $P(T|T')$ can be reconstructed from simulation data using numerically stabilized inversion. \nIn the supercooled regime, the reconstructed$P(T|T')$ is well described by a Gamma distribution. The reciprocal of the shape parameter ($\\overline{A}^2$) quantifies the relative variance of temperature fluctuations and is measurable from the velocity kurtosis via Eq. (\\ref{ksim}). The corresponding non-factorizable and hence, as we emphasize and elaborate on, constrained correlated structure of the velocity distribution is discussed in Appendix \\ref{app:correlated}.\n\nMost importantly, the high temperature tail area $\\mathcal{A}(T'>T_m)$ of the distribution $P$ above the equilibrium melting (or liquidus temperature) tracks, within numerical error, the reciprocal of the shear viscosity. Specifically, as the temperature $T$ drops and the supercooled liquid approaches the glass transition temperature $T_g$, the tail area $\\mathcal{A}$ decreases smoothly. Its reciprocal steadily increasingly with the measured viscosity following an apparent VFT like increase. This allows for a direct bridge between microscopic temperature fluctuations and macroscopic transport slowdown without resorting to phenomenological kinetic assumptions. In strict equilibrium, $\\mathcal{A}=0$ and the construction collapses to a single Maxwellian, highlighting that the observed sigmoid crossover between $T_m$ and $T_g$ is intrinsically tied to nonequilibrium ensemble broadening. We find that the simulated systems are consistent with values of $\\overline{A}$ with experimental viscosity data of fluids of different types (Fig. \\ref{Collapse.}). The simulation viscosities entering this comparison were obtained via the SLLOD algorithm of Appendix \\ref{app:sllod}.\n\nTaken together, the inverse Laplace reconstruction of the distribution $P$, its Gamma description, and the associated kurtosis of the studied Lennard-Jones type systems provide a self-consistent interpretation of heterogeneous dynamics in supercooled liquids. The resulting framework may rationalize behaviors of real (experimental) supercooled fluids. Our approach converts momentum space deviations from Maxwellian statistics into a measurable distribution of effective\ntemperatures and identifies the width of this distribution as a key control parameter governing relaxation slowdown. The emergence of ever slower sluggish glassy dynamics as the system temperature drops is a consequence of a progressively narrowing support of rare fluctuations that emulate the equilibrium system above its melting temperature $T'=T_{m}$.\n\nOn a technical level, the stochastic thermostats introduced in this work, the HTLA and Two-Bath Andersen schemes, provide a principled controllable route to non-Maxwellian velocity statistics in MD simulations. The HTLA thermostat draws post collision relative velocities from a Student-$t$ distribution with tunable tail index. This yields a steady state kurtosis $k = 3(\\nu_s-2)/(\\nu_s-4)$ for $\\nu_s > 4$ degrees of freedom, i.e.,\\ an excess kurtosis relative to the Maxwellian (Gaussian) distribution of $\\kappa:= k-3 = 6/(\\nu_s-4)$. The Two-Bath thermostat couples particles stochastically to two reservoirs at cold and hot temperatures $T_c$ and $T_h$. For the symmetric case, $p_{\\rm hot}=1/2$ with dimensionless contrast $c:=(T_h-T_c)/(T_h+T_c)$, the steady state is a balanced mixture of two Maxwellians whose excess kurtosis is $\\kappa(c) = 3c^2$. The agreement with $\\kappa\\simeq3\\overline{A}^{2}$ enables a controlled non-Maxwellian environment. Increasing the contrast parameter broadens the velocity distribution, suppresses crystallization, and increases the structural relaxation time $\\langle\\tau_\\alpha\\rangle$. The specific details of our thermostats are given in Appendix~\\ref{app:thermostats}. \n\nA broadened probability distribution $P(T|T')$, and hence a finite initial excess kurtosis, is itself a consequence of supercooling in various situations (see Ref.~\\cite{preprint6} focusing on closed systems and Appendix~\\ref{rem:drive}).\nOnce supercooling ceases, a closed system (for which moments of its Hamiltonian trivially remain time translationally invariant) will continue to exhibit a finite standard deviation of its energy density. For general open systems, the reduced probability density relation of Eq. (\\ref{eq:localP}) applies. Although a full system equilibrium probability density is trivially time translationally invariant, initial reduced few particle probability densities of an equilibrium form may vary in time, governed by BBGKY type equations. When these reduced equilibrium probability densities $\\rho_{{\\sf eq.},n}$ are (nearly) stationary, and if the initial excess velocity kurtosis is finite (i.e., if $P$ is not a delta function in the temperature), then the probability density of Eq. (\\ref{eq:localP}) will retain this post-supercooling velocity kurtosis for all (respectively, long) times. A plethora of different systems may share identical reduced probability densities, including those of the single particle momentum (or velocity) distribution. There are also non-stationary spatially uniform states with lifetimes much shorter than those of the supercooled state for which initial velocity kurtosis will decay rapidly, e.g., the uniform dilute gas type system discussed in Appendix \\ref{app:boltzmann}. As seen from Liouville's equation, an asymmetry between the configuration and momentum space effective temperature distributions in a liquid will generally give rise to drift of the probability density with the respective contributions being proportional to the mechanical power $\\dot K$ and the differences between the kinetic and configuration space inverse temperatures. To close our circle of ideas, to date the focus has been on asymmetric (highly complex and rich) non-uniform spatial configuration and (trivial) uniform momentum space descriptions with standard thermostats not allowing richer kinetic descriptions. We hope that our work will motivate further studies of enabling configuration and momentum space descriptions to be more symmetric as they are at the level of the equations of motion. In particular, simulation protocols that do not force Gaussian velocities, and measurements (e.g., deep inelastic neutron scattering and particle resolved colloidal velocities) that may probe the momentum sector directly. \n\n\\begin{acknowledgments}\nThis work is dedicated to the memory of our dear colleague, mentor, and friend Kenneth F. Kelton who is sorely missed. We are thankful to numerous colleagues with whom we interacted during the course of this work. In particular, we are grateful to K. F. Kelton, Shivaji L. Sondhi, and Gilles Tarjus for many discussions and much encouragement. GT was supported by the McDonnell International Scholar Academy at Washington University in Saint Louis. ZN's work at Oxford and the Laboratoire de Physique Th\\'eorique de la Mati\\`ere Condens\\'ee (LPTMC) were, respectively, supported by a Leverhulme Trust International Professorship (S. L. Sondhi) grant (number LIP-2020-014) and by the CNRS.\n\\end{acknowledgments}\n\n\\appendix\n\n\\section{Reduced probability densities of metastable states: review}\n\\label{app:theorem}\n\n\\noindent In order to make notions that motivated the current work more self-contained, we review some of these elements.\n\n\\subsection{Stationary reduced probability densities}\n\nThe central result of Ref.~\\cite{Nussinov2024}, complementing the framework~\\cite{grant16,grant15,preprint2,preprint6,Planck22,book_TOP}, that led to the prediction of non-Maxwellian velocity distributions links the reduced few body\n($n = \\mathcal{O}(1)$) probability densities of macroscopic ($N \\gg 1$)\nmetastable systems to their thermal equilibrium counterparts. Under\nensemble equivalence (which holds for conventional disorder-free\nHamiltonians governing supercooled liquids and their equilibrium\ncounterparts), the reduced $n$-particle probability density of a\nstationary state at inverse temperature $\\beta$, chemical potential\n$\\mu, \\ldots$ is\n%\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\label{central-theorem}\n&& \\rho_{{\\sf stationary},n}(\\beta, \\mu, \\ldots) = \\nonumber \\\\\n&& \\int d\\beta' d \\mu' \\ldots \\Big( P(\\beta, \\mu, \\ldots| \\beta', \\mu', \\ldots )\n\\nonumber \\\\\n&& \\times \\rho_{{\\sf eq.},n}(\\beta', \\mu', \\ldots) \\Big) \\nonumber\n\\\\ && +\n\\int_{\\cal{CO}} d\\epsilon' d {\\tilde{{\\sf n}}}' \\cdots\n\\Big(P(\\epsilon, {\\tilde{{\\sf n}}}, \\ldots| \\epsilon', {\\tilde{{\\sf n}}}'\n,\\ldots) \\nonumber \\\\\n&& \\times \\rho_{{\\sf eq.},n} (\\epsilon', {\\tilde{{\\sf n}}}', \\ldots) \\Big).\n\\end{eqnarray}\n%\nIt should be emphasized that this is not if and only if condition. That is, not all reduced probabilities of the weighted form of Eq. (\\ref{central-theorem}) need to be stationary. Rather, what Ref. ~\\cite{Nussinov2024} established is that all stationary reduced probability densities must be of the above form. Eq. (\\ref{central-theorem}) is an extended and slightly more precise form of Eq. (\\ref{eq:localP}) when there is a region of equilibrium phase coexistence ${\\cal{CO}}$. Here, $\\rho_n := {\\sf Tr}_{n+1,\\ldots,N}(\\rho_\\Lambda)$ is the partial\ntrace of the full many body probability density. A simplified form of\nthis equation, omitting the coexistence term, is stated in the main\ntext (Section~II); the present Eq.~(\\ref{central-theorem}) is more\ncomplete in that it explicitly retains the contribution from the\nphase-coexistence region.\n\nStationarity of the long time average\n$\\rho^* := \\lim_{\\tau\\to\\infty}\\frac{1}{\\tau}\n\\int_t^{t+\\tau}\\rho_\\Lambda(t')\\,dt'$\nimplies $[\\rho^*,H]=0$ ( in the quantum arena) or $\\{\\rho^*,H\\}_{P.B.}=0$ (classical).\nThe most general solution to these commutator or Poisson bracket conditions \nis a weighted sum of projection operators onto states of fixed energy $E'$ and conserved quantities\n$\\{W'_\\alpha\\}$:\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{PEW}\n{\\mathbb{P}}_{E',\\{W'_{\\alpha}\\}} = |E', \\{W'_{\\alpha}\\}\\rangle\\langle E',\\{W'_{\\alpha}\\}|.\n\\end{equation}\n%\nWhenever ensemble equivalence holds and $\\mathcal{P}$ is smooth, this\nyields Eq.~\\eqref{central-theorem} with the weight\n$\\mathcal{P}(E',\\{W'_\\alpha\\})$ identified with\n$P(\\beta,\\ldots|\\beta',\\ldots)$.\n\nSeveral remarks are in order:\n\\begin{enumerate}\\setlength\\itemsep{2pt}\n\\item The linear map of Eq.~\\eqref{central-theorem} applies\n \\emph{only} to stationary $\\rho_{{\\sf stationary},n}$. Strictly speaking, it cannot\n link equilibrium densities to arbitrary time evolving probability\n densities.\n\\item For a bona fide equilibrium system,\n $P(\\beta,\\mu,\\ldots|\\beta',\\mu',\\ldots) =\n \\delta(\\beta'-\\beta)\\delta(\\mu'-\\mu)\\cdots$, recovering the standard\n result.\n\\item Eq.~\\eqref{central-theorem} should also apply to the putative ideal glass\n (conjectured to be permanently quiescent ~\\cite{Cavagna,BB})\n whenever ensemble equivalence holds.\n\\end{enumerate}\n\nIn general, although the system may have a fixed particle number or energy,\nwhenever the reduced few body probability density is stationary the system\neffectively lies in the convex hull of equilibrium states~\\cite{Nussinov2024}\nand samples equilibrium states of different energy densities, particle\ndensities, and any other conserved quantities, as in\nEq.~\\eqref{central-theorem} of the macroscopic system.\nConceptually, Eq.~\\eqref{central-theorem} bears some similarity to, and\nmay be further refined by, the ergodic decomposition theorem whenever the\nsystem has disjoint ergodic sectors. Unlike the usual textbook realizations\nof the ergodic theorem, the ergodic sectors in Eq.~\\eqref{central-theorem}\nare effectively labeled by different intensive state variables and other\nconstants of motion densities. Ref.~\\cite{preprint2} employed the above\nnotion, taking the equilibrium particle density as a state variable, to\nexamine the jamming transition. Since the particle density of the crystal\nand that of the supercooled liquid differ, contributions from the\ncoexistence region (the $\\int_{\\cal{CO}}$ term in\nEq.~\\eqref{central-theorem}) are in general non negligible and must be\nretained in a complete treatment.\n\n\\subsection{Near stationarity of the supercooled liquid}\n\nIn the metastable supercooled liquid at $T > T_g$, local few body\nobservables are nearly (but not perfectly) stationary, since\ncrystallization occurs after a finite time $\\tau_{\\sf xtal}$. The\nratio of microscopic to crystallization timescales,\n%\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\label{scales-eq}\n 10^{-10} \\gtrsim \\tau_{\\sf micro}/\\tau_{\\sf xtal} \\gtrsim 10^{-17},\n\\end{eqnarray}\n%\nensures that corrections to Eq.~\\eqref{central-theorem} are\nexceptionally small~\\cite{Nussinov2024}. These bounds include metallic glass formers (where the crystallization times $\\tau_{\\sf xtal}\\gtrsim 10^{-3}$~s) to silicate and\norganic systems ($\\tau_{\\sf xtal}\\gtrsim 10^4$~s just above\n$T_g$)~\\cite{Kelton_review}.\n\n\\begin{tcolorbox}[enhanced, colback=yellow!10!white, colframe=black,\n boxrule=0.7pt, arc=2pt, left=8pt, right=8pt, top=6pt, bottom=6pt]\nSince local few body expectation values in the metastable supercooled\nfluid differ from those in the equilibrium liquid or crystal, the\ndistribution $P$ in Eq.~\\eqref{central-theorem} must differ from the\nequilibrium delta-function form. $P$ must therefore have a\n\\textbf{finite standard deviation} in at least one state variable.\n\\end{tcolorbox}\n\n\\begin{remark}[time averaged versus instantaneous correlators]\nWhen the probability densities $\\rho_\\Lambda(t')$ are not completely\nstationary, connected correlation functions computed with their\ntime average can be spatially longer ranged than their instantaneous\ncounterparts. To see this precisely, let $A$ and $B$ be local\nobservables at spatially separated points, and let\n$\\overline{X(t')} = \\frac{1}{\\tau}\\int_t^{t+\\tau} X(t')\\,dt'$\ndenote the time average computed with the uniform distribution\n$P_\\tau(t') = \\frac{1}{\\tau}\\Theta(t+\\tau-t')\\Theta(t'-t)$.\nSuppose that at every instant $t'$ the equilibrium probability density\n$\\rho_\\Lambda(t')$ has only local spatial correlations, so that\n$\\langle A(t')B(t')\\rangle - \\langle A(t')\\rangle\\langle B(t')\\rangle\n\\to 0$ for $A$ and $B$ far apart.\nNevertheless, the time averaged covariance\n\\begin{equation}\n \\overline{\\langle A(t')B(t')\\rangle}\n - \\overline{\\langle A(t')\\rangle}\\;\\overline{\\langle B(t')\\rangle}\n \\label{eq:time_avg_covar}\n\\end{equation}\nneed not vanish, because the time average mixes instantaneous states\nat different $t'$, and cross-correlations between $\\langle A(t')\\rangle$\nevaluated at one time and $\\langle B(t'')\\rangle$ at another can\nsurvive the averaging even when the instantaneous connected correlator\nis short-ranged. This is precisely why \\emph{only empirically measured\nlocal} finite-particle expectation values need be nearly static in the\nsupercooled state: global stationarity of $\\rho_\\Lambda$ is not\nrequired, and long range correlations in time averaged quantities do\nnot contradict the short-range nature of the instantaneous equilibrium\ndensities.\n\nFinally, we note that the reduced $n$-particle probability density of\nEq.~\\eqref{central-theorem} can be amended by an additive contribution\n$\\mathrm{Tr}_{n+1,\\ldots,N}(f_\\Lambda)$, where $f_\\Lambda$ is a\ncorrection to the full many body density that keeps the reduced\nprobability density positive semidefinite while leaving the\nnear stationarity condition intact.\n\\end{remark}\n\n\\subsection{An origin of finite width of $P(T|T')$}\n\\label{rem:drive}\nWe now outline a mechanism~\\cite{preprint6} by which the distribution $P(T|T')$ acquires a finite width. \n\n\nLet $\\{\\phi_i\\}_{i=1}^N$ denote compact local fields (e.g.\\ local energy or order parameter densities) at $N$ spatial sites, governed by a local Hamiltonian\n$H_0[\\{\\phi_i\\}] = \\sum_i\\bigl[\\tfrac{r}{2}\\phi_i^2 + \\tfrac{u}{4}\\phi_i^4 + \\cdots\\bigr]$.\nDuring rapid cooling, the external bath couples linearly to all sites\nthrough a common fluctuating field $h(t)$. This is modeled by the term\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n H_{\\rm drive} = -h(t)\\sum_i \\phi_i,\n \\qquad \\nonumber\n \\\\ \n \\langle h(t)\\rangle = 0,\\quad \\langle h(t)h(t')\\rangle = D\\,\\delta(t-t').\n \\label{eq:Hdrive}\n\\end{eqnarray}\nThe coupling must be that to an {\\it extensive} fraction of sites in order to change the global energy density $\\bar{E}=(1/N)\\sum_i\\epsilon_i$ at a finite rate.\n\nWe next integrate out the fluctuating field $h(t)$. \nRather explicitly, the path integral over $\\{\\phi_i\\}$ and $h$ is\n$Z = \\int \\mathcal{D}[\\{\\phi_i\\}]\\,\\mathcal{D}[h]\\,e^{-S_0-S_{\\rm drive}}$,\nwith $S_{\\rm drive} = \\int dt\\bigl[-h\\sum_i\\phi_i + h^2/(2D)\\bigr]$.\nTrivially completing the square, \n\\begin{equation}\n -h\\sum_i\\phi_i + \\frac{h^2}{2D}\n = \\frac{1}{2D}\\Bigl(h - D\\sum_i\\phi_i\\Bigr)^2\n - \\frac{D}{2}\\Bigl(\\sum_i\\phi_i\\Bigr)^2,\n\\end{equation}\nand integrating out $h$ leads to the effective action\n\\begin{equation}\n S_{\\rm eff} = S_0 - \\frac{D}{2}\\int dt\\,\\sum_{i,j}\\phi_i(t)\\phi_j(t).\n \\label{eq:Seff}\n\\end{equation}\nThe integrated out drive $h$ generates an \\emph{all-to-all coupling} $-\\tfrac{D}{2}\\phi_i\\phi_j$ between every pair of sites, including $i\\neq j$. The all-to-all coupling in Eq. (\\ref{eq:Seff}) yields a positive covariance between any pair of sites, \n\\begin{equation}\n \\mathrm{Cov}(\\phi_i,\\phi_j) = D\\chi^2\\tau_{\\rm drive} = \\mathcal{O}(1).\n \\label{eq:cov_drive}\n\\end{equation}\nHere, $\\chi$ is the local susceptibility and $\\tau_{\\rm drive}$ is the duration of the cooling. The variance of the global intensive average $\\bar\\Phi = N^{-1}\\sum_i\\phi_i$ is then system size independent,\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n \\mathrm{Var}(\\bar\\Phi)\n = \\frac{1}{N^2}\\sum_{i,j}\\mathrm{Cov}(\\phi_i,\\phi_j) \\nonumber\n\\\\ = \\frac{N^2}{N^2}\\,D\\chi^2\\tau_{\\rm drive}\n = \\mathcal{O}(1).\n \\label{eq:var_global}\n\\end{eqnarray}\nThe above result is diametrically opposite to the case of independent fluctuations. For the latter case, in the thermodynamic limit, $\\mathrm{Var}(\\bar\\Phi)_{\\rm indep} = \\sigma_{\\rm local}^2/N\\to 0$. The compactness of the fields (the $u\\phi^4$ term) ensures $\\sigma_\\epsilon = \\mathcal{O}(1)$ remains finite rather than diverging with $\\tau_{\\rm drive}$.\n\nOnce the common drive ceases to act, each site couples to its own independent local noise $\\xi_i(t)$ with $\\langle\\xi_i(t)\\xi_j(t')\\rangle = 2T\\delta_{ij}\\delta(t-t')$. The intersite covariance then decays,\n\\begin{equation}\n \\frac{d}{dt}\\langle\\phi_i\\phi_j\\rangle\n \\approx -(\\gamma_i+\\gamma_j)\\langle\\phi_i\\phi_j\\rangle,\n \\qquad i\\neq j,\n\\end{equation}\nexponentially on local relaxation timescale. The all-to-all coupling in Eq.~\\eqref{eq:Seff} vanishes and $\\mathrm{Cov}(\\phi_i,\\phi_j)\\to 0$ for $i\\neq j$. Consequently,\n\\begin{equation}\n \\mathrm{Var}(\\bar\\Phi)_{\\rm after} = \\frac{1}{N}\\mathrm{Var}(\\phi_i) = \\mathcal{O}(1/N) \\to 0.\n\\end{equation}\nA finite $\\mathcal{O}(1)$ standard deviation of the global average in the stationary state will require long range correlations that are no longer present \\cite{preprint6}.\n\nIn the content of rapid cooling, each local field $\\phi_i$ acted on by the drive was displaced to a value encoding a local effective temperature $T'_i$. Once the drive (cooling) ceases, the system cannot veer towards its true equilibrium crystalline state on short times. Just below the melting temperature, critical nuclei are large and rare, yielding low nucleation rate. At the other (low temperature) limit of the supercooled system, the viscosity is enormous and the dynamics are arrested, so even though crystalline nuclei may form they cannot grow in size. Held between these two pincers (few nuclei near melting and frozen dynamics at low temperature), the distribution of the fields $\\{\\phi_i\\}$ may become arrested on exceptionally long timescales. The distribution of $\\{T'_i\\}$ across different regions of the system is of width\n\\begin{equation}\n \\sigma(T') \n = \\sqrt{\\mathrm{Var}(\\{T'_i\\})}\n = \\mathcal{O}(\\Abar\\, T).\n \\label{eq:sigma_spatial}\n\\end{equation}\nThat is, the standard deviation of the fields is system size independent, $\\mathcal{O}(1)$. It is precisely this system size independent width of $T'$ in the \\emph{reduced few body local probability density} (borne by a spatial variation of effective local temperatures across the system), that constitutes the finite width $P(T|T')$ of Eq.~\\eqref{central-theorem}. This wide (i.e., non delta function) distribution $P$ gives rise to the non-Maxwellian velocity statistics observed in the present work. \n\nInequalities for maintaining equilibrium systems can be arrived by applying this logic in reverse. That is, demanding that $P$ have a vanishing width so that the system is in equilibrium leads to bounds on the maximal rates of change of observables \\cite{preprint6,Planck22}. \n\n\\subsection{Viscosity from local observables}\n\\label{app:viscosity_local}\n\nSetting the observable $Q$ in Eq.~\\eqref{central-theorem} to the\nterminal velocity of a sphere falling through the liquid (Stokes\nequation), and noting that equilibrium flow occurs only above the\nliquidus temperature $T_l$, gives~\\cite{book_TOP,grant16,grant15,preprint2,Nussinov2024}:\n%\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\label{viscosityfromv}\n\\eta(T) \\simeq \\frac{\\eta_{\\sf eq.}(T^+_{l})}{\\int_{T_{l}}^{\\infty} dT' P(T|T')},\n\\end{eqnarray}\n%\nwhich with a Gaussian $P(T|T')$ of width $\\overline{A}T$ yields the erfc collapse\nof Eq.~\\eqref{eq:visc1}.\n\n\\begin{tcolorbox}[enhanced, colback=yellow!10!white, colframe=black,\n boxrule=0.7pt, arc=2pt, left=8pt, right=8pt, top=6pt, bottom=6pt]\nA \\textbf{unique} function $P$ should consistently provide predictions\nfor \\textit{all} local few body observables of a given fluid.\nKnown singularities of equilibrium phase transitions will be\n``smeared out'' by a $P$ that is not a delta function, yet the\nequilibrium melting temperature still plays a prominent role ---\nunderlying the appearance of $T_l$ in the viscosity collapse.\n\\end{tcolorbox}\n\n\\section{Kurtosis decay in a dilute gas with elastic binary collisions: Boltzmann equation analysis}\n\\label{app:boltzmann}\n\nIn the Appendix, we study the decay of an initial velocity kurtosis for a spatially homogeneous (dilute gas) system within the framework of the Boltzmann equation,\n\\begin{equation}\n \\partial_t f(\\vec{v},t) = C[f,f].\n\\end{equation}\nHere, $C[f,f]$ is the elastic binary collision operator conserving\nparticle number, momentum, and kinetic energy. In what follows, we introduce shorthands for the velocity moments\n$M_n = \\int d\\vec{v}\\, |\\vec{v}|^n f(\\vec{v},t)$. Particle number, momentum, and energy conservation imply that $\\dot{M}_0 = \\dot{M}_2 = 0$. The per component excess kurtosis $\\kappa=\\langle v_x^4\\rangle/\\langle v_x^2\\rangle^2-3$ that we used throughout the current work is, for an isotropic $f$,\n\\begin{equation}\n \\kt = \\frac{9}{5}\\,\\frac{M_4}{M_2^2} - 3.\n\\end{equation}\nAs it must, $\\kt$ vanishes for the Maxwell--Boltzmann distribution (where $M_4/M_2^2=5/3$). Since $M_2$ is conserved, the evolution of the excess kurtosis is determined entirely by $\\dot{M}_4$.\n\nUsing the standard symmetrized form of $C[f,f]$ and introducing\ncenter of mass and relative velocities, $\\vec{V} := (\\vec{v}_1\n+ \\vec{v}_2)/2$, $\\vec{g} := \\vec{v}_1 - \\vec{v}_2$, with\n$|\\vec{g}'|=|\\vec{g}|$ following the collision, \nwith $\\theta$ the angle between $\\vec{g}'$ and $\\vec{g}$, and a solid angle $d\\Omega$ integral over the direction of $\\vec{g}'$,\nwe have that\n\\begin{equation}\n \\frac{dM_4}{dt}\n = \\frac{1}{4}\\int d\\vec{v}_1\\,d\\vec{v}_2\\,d\\Omega\\;\n B(g,\\theta)\\,f_1 f_2\n \\bigl(v_1'^{\\,4}+v_2'^{\\,4}-v_1^4-v_2^4\\bigr).\n \\label{eq:M4dot_full}\n\\end{equation}\nA direct calculation yields \n\\begin{equation}\n v_1'^{\\,4}+v_2'^{\\,4}-v_1^4-v_2^4\n \\;=\\;\n 2\\bigl[(\\vec{V}\\cdot\\vec{g}')^2 - (\\vec{V}\\cdot\\vec{g})^2\\bigr].\n \\label{eq:diff_exact}\n\\end{equation}\nFor Maxwellian particles, $B(g,\\theta)=B(\\theta)$ is independent of\n$g=|\\vec{g}|$. Expressing the deviation of the single particle velocity distribution from Maxwellian (M) equilibrium as\n$f(\\vec{v},t)=f_{\\mathrm{M}}(\\vec{v})\\,[1+h(\\vec{v},t)]$ and\nlinearizing $C[f,f]$ about $f_{\\mathrm{M}}$, the perturbation evolves as\n$\\partial_t h=\\mathcal{L}h$. The linearized collision operator $\\mathcal{L}h$ is\ndefined exactly by\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n (\\mathcal{L}h)(\\vec{v}_1)\n &:=&\\int d\\vec{v}_2\\int d\\Omega\\;B(\\theta) f_{\\mathrm{M}}(\\vec{v}_2)\\, \n \\\\ \n&& \\times \\bigl[\\,h(\\vec{v}_1')+h(\\vec{v}_2')-h(\\vec{v}_1)-h(\\vec{v}_2)\\,\\bigr]. \\nonumber\n \\label{eq:Llin}\n\\end{eqnarray}\nThe two gain terms\n$h(\\vec{v}_{1,2}')$ and two loss terms $h(\\vec{v}_{1,2})$ arise\nbecause $f_{\\mathrm{M}}(\\vec{v}_1')f_{\\mathrm{M}}(\\vec{v}_2')\n=f_{\\mathrm{M}}(\\vec{v}_1)f_{\\mathrm{M}}(\\vec{v}_2)$ by energy\nconservation. The operator $\\mathcal{L}$ is self adjoint and negative\nsemidefinite with respect to the weighted inner product $\\langle\ng,h\\rangle=\\int d\\vec{v}\\,f_{\\mathrm{M}}(\\vec{v})\\,g(\\vec{v})\nh(\\vec{v})$, with kernel spanned by the collision invariants\n$\\{1,\\vec{v},\\vec{v}^2\\}$. For Maxwellian particles, it enjoys an eigenfunction expansion in Sonine (associated Laguerre) polynomials \\cite{Bobylev1976,Cercignani1988}. The fourth order Sonine polynomial,\n\\begin{equation}\n S_2^{(1/2)}(c^2) \\;\\propto\\; c^4 - 5c^2 + \\tfrac{15}{4},\n \\quad c^2 = |\\vec{v}|^2/(2T),\n\\end{equation}\nis an eigenfunction of $\\mathcal{L}$ of eigenvalue $-\\nu_4 < 0$.\nHere, \n\\begin{equation}\n \\nu_4 = n \\int_0^\\pi B(\\theta)(1-\\cos^4\\theta)\\sin\\theta\\,d\\theta\n \\;\\sim\\; \\frac{1}{\\tcoll},\n \\label{eq:nu4}\n\\end{equation}\nwith $\\tcoll$ denoting the microsopic collision time scale. Since the excess kurtosis is proportional to the coefficient of this\neigenfunction in the expansion of $f - f_{\\mathrm{M}}$, it satisfies\n\\begin{equation}\n \\frac{d(\\kt)}{dt} = -\\nu_4\\,\\kt,\n \\qquad\n \\kt = \\kinit\\,e^{-\\nu_4 t}.\n \\label{eq:kappa_normal}\n\\end{equation}\nThe excess kurtosis $\\kappa$ is thus not a hydrodynamic mode. Rather, in this system, $\\kappa$ decays on the said collision timescale $\\tcoll \\sim \\nu_4^{-1}$, faster than any\nhydrodynamic (sound/diffusion) mode, and independently of the\nhydrodynamic fields.\n\nThe above simple calculation was for an idealized homogeneous system with elastic binary collisions. Supercooled liquids are far more complex (and nonuniform) than such systems. For the supercooled state, the theorem of Ref.~\\cite{Nussinov2024}\nestablishes that the single particle velocity distribution is a weighted sum of Maxwellian distributions at different effective\ntemperatures $T'$, drawn from a distribution $P(T|T')$ of nonzero\nwidth. For the Gaussian ansatz with dimensionless width $\\Abar$,\nthe steady state excess kurtosis follows from the moment identity of Eq.~(\\ref{eq:kappa_Abar}),\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n \\kss = 3\\Abar^2,\n \\label{eq:kss_A}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhere $\\Abar$ also governs the erfc viscosity\nformula of Eq. (\\ref{eq:visc1})~\\cite{grant15,Nussinov2024},\nwhich fits the viscosity of 45 supercooled liquids over 16 decades\nwith $\\Abar \\simeq 0.08 \\pm 0.03$~\\cite{grant15}.\n\n\nFor more realistic interactions (e.g.\\ hard spheres), the eigenvalue\n$\\nu_4$ acquires velocity dependence and nonlinear corrections appear,\n\\begin{equation}\n \\frac{d(\\kt)}{dt} = -\\nu_4\\,\\kt + \\nu_2\\,\\kappa^2(t) + \\cdots,\n\\end{equation}\nbut the dominant term remains $-\\nu_4\\,\\kt$ for small $\\kt$.\n\n% ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n\n% ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n\n\n\n\n\n% ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n\\section{Thermostat Descriptions}\n\\label{app:thermostats}\n\n\\subsection{Conventional Thermostats}\n\n\\subsubsection{Nos\\'{e}--Hoover}\n The Nos\\'e--Hoover thermostat~\\cite{Hoover1985} introduces a deterministic thermal reservoir through a\n dynamically evolving friction coefficient that regulates the kinetic temperature.\n In discrete time, the particle velocities are updated according to\n \\begin{equation}\n \\vec{v}_{i,n+1} =\n \\vec{v}_{i,n}\n + \\Delta t \\left(\n \\frac{\\vec{F}_{i,n}}{m_i}\n - \\zeta_n\\,\\vec{v}_{i,n}\n \\right),\n \\end{equation}\n where the thermostat variable evolves as\n \\begin{equation}\n \\zeta_{n+1} =\n \\zeta_n\n + \\frac{\\Delta t}{Q}\n \\left(\n \\frac{T_n}{T_{\\text{bath}}} - 1\n \\right),\n \\end{equation}\n with $Q$ the effective thermostat mass. In the long time limit, this scheme\n samples the canonical ensemble with a Maxwellian velocity distribution.\n\n\\subsubsection{Berendsen}\n The Berendsen thermostat~\\cite{berendsen1984molecular} regulates the system temperature through global velocity\n rescaling:\n \\begin{equation}\n \\vec{v}_{i,n+1} =\n \\vec{v}_{i,n}\n \\left(\n 1 + \\frac{\\Delta t}{\\tau}\n \\left(\n \\frac{T_{\\text{bath}}}{T_n} - 1\n \\right)\n \\right)^{1/2}.\n \\end{equation}\n This thermostat is computationally efficient but does not generate a true canonical ensemble, and frequently samples velocity distributions with negative $\\kappa$, narrower than Maxwell-Boltzmann.\n\n\\subsubsection{Langevin}\nThe Langevin thermostat~\\cite{AllenTildesley2017} models the thermal bath through a combination of viscous\ndamping and stochastic forcing:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{split}\n\\vec{v}_{i,n+1}\n&= \\vec{v}_{i,n}\n+ \\Delta t\n\\left(\n\\frac{\\vec{F}_{i,n}}{m_i}\n- \\gamma\\,\\vec{v}_{i,n}\n\\right)\n+ \\sqrt{\\frac{2\\gamma T_{\\text{bath}}\\Delta t}{m_i}}\\,\n\\vec{\\eta}_{i,n},\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\gamma$ is the friction coefficient and $\\vec{\\eta}_{i,n}$ is a vector of\nindependent Gaussian random variables with zero mean and unit variance. Langevin dynamics is common practice to achieve the canonical Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.\n\n\\subsection{Non-Equilibrium Thermostats}\n\n\\subsubsection{Heavy-Tailed Lowe--Andersen (HTLA) Thermostat}\n\nThe HTLA thermostat generalizes the conventional\nstochastic Andersen/Lowe~\\cite{Andersen_thermostat} collision scheme by replacing the Maxwell--Boltzmann\npost collision velocity sampling with a heavy-tailed kernel.\n\nCollision pairs $(i,j)$ are selected\nwith probability $P_{\\mathrm{coll}} = 1 - e^{-\\nu \\Delta t}$.\nFor each selected pair, only the relative velocity projected along the\ninterparticle axis direction,\n$g_{ij}^{\\parallel} = (\\vec{v}_i - \\vec{v}_j)\\cdot \\hat{{r}}_{ij}$,\nis resampled. In HTLA, the Gaussian kernel is replaced by a Student-$t$ distribution:\n\\begin{equation}\nP_{\\mathrm{HTLA}}(g^{\\parallel}) =\n\\frac{\\Gamma\\!\\left(\\frac{\\nu_s+1}{2}\\right)}\n{\\sqrt{\\nu_s \\pi}\\,\\Gamma\\!\\left(\\frac{\\nu_s}{2}\\right)\\sigma}\n\\left[\n1 + \\frac{(g^{\\parallel})^2}{\\nu_s \\sigma^2}\n\\right]^{-\\frac{\\nu_s+1}{2}},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\nu_s$ denotes the number of degrees of freedom (the tail index) and $\\sigma^2 = T / \\mu$ sets the thermal scale. The tail index maps to a control parameter $A$ via $\\nu_s = 2/A^2$, so that the kurtosis of the HTLA distribution is\n\\begin{equation}\n\\kappa =\n\\begin{cases}\n3(\\nu_s - 2)/(\\nu_s - 4), & \\nu_s > 4, \\\\\n\\infty, & \\nu_s \\le 4.\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nSince only relative velocities are redrawn, linear momentum is conserved pairwise.\n\n\\subsubsection{Two-Bath Andersen Thermostat}\n\nThe Two-Bath Andersen thermostat extends the conventional Andersen scheme by\ncoupling particles to two distinct thermal reservoirs at temperatures $T_c$ and $T_h$.\nWhen a collision event occurs for particle $i$ with probability $P_{\\mathrm{coll}} = 1 - e^{-\\nu \\Delta t}$, the hot bath is selected with probability $p_{\\mathrm{hot}}$. The post collision velocity is reassigned from the Maxwell--Boltzmann\ndistribution corresponding to the chosen bath. The unconditional distribution at collision events is therefore a mixture:\n\\begin{equation}\nP(\\vec{v})\n=\n(1 - p_{\\mathrm{hot}}) P(\\vec{v} \\mid T_c)\n+\np_{\\mathrm{hot}} P(\\vec{v} \\mid T_h).\n\\end{equation}\nThe kurtosis of a single velocity component is\n\\begin{equation}\n\\kappa\n=\n3\\,\n\\frac{\n(1 - p_{\\mathrm{hot}}) T_c^2\n+\np_{\\mathrm{hot}} T_h^2\n}{\n\\left[\n(1 - p_{\\mathrm{hot}}) T_c\n+\np_{\\mathrm{hot}} T_h\n\\right]^2\n} - 3.\n\\end{equation}\nFor the symmetric case $p_{\\mathrm{hot}} = \\tfrac12$ with parameterization\n$T_h = T_0(1+c)$, $T_c = T_0(1-c)$:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\kappa(c)\n=\n3(1 + c^2) - 3 = 3c^2.\n\\end{equation}\nThus increasing temperature separation produces systematic\nheavy-tailed broadening relative to Maxwellian statistics.\n\n\\subsubsection{Stochastic Elastic-Collision Thermostat}\n\nWe also employ a custom-designed stochastic thermostat that models central,\nthree-dimensional elastic collisions between MD\nparticles of mass $M$ and background gas particles of mass $m$.\nThe post collision velocity of the MD particle is\n\\begin{equation}\n\\vec{v}_{n+1}\n=\n\\frac{M - m}{M + m} \\vec{v}_n\n+\n\\frac{2m}{M + m} \\vec{v}_s,\n\\label{eq:elastic_update}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\vec{v}_s$ is sampled from a Maxwell--Boltzmann distribution at bath temperature $T_b$. This thermostat provides a physically\ntransparent mechanism for modeling thermal exchange while preserving microscopic conservation laws at each collision event.\n\n\\subsubsection{Other Thermostats}\n\nAdditional variants explored include MD-simulated gas-liquid collisions (where an ideal gas is spawned alongside the MD liquid and elastic collisions occur at designated contact distances) and a Randomized Berendsen thermostat in which the coupling parameter is drawn randomly:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\vec{v}_{n+1}=\\frac{\\vec{v}_n}{|\\vec{v}_n|} \\left(|\\vec{v}_n|+R \\left(\\sqrt{2T/3m}-|\\vec{v}_n|\\right)\\right),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $R\\ll 1$ is a randomly chosen small coupling parameter. These variants were found to be less numerically tractable on feasible MD timescales.\n\n\\subsection{Drawbacks of Conventional Thermostats}\n\nThe Nos\\'e--Hoover thermostat imposes a Maxwell--Boltzmann velocity distribution by design. By enforcing this distribution deterministically, it can distort the natural evolution of dynamical observables in non-ergodic or highly heterogeneous states.\n\nThe Berendsen thermostat does not generate a true canonical ensemble. Instead of sampling from the correct Maxwell--Boltzmann distribution, it suppresses the natural fluctuations in kinetic energy, artificially narrowing the velocity distribution and distorting fluctuation-derived properties.\n\nThe Langevin thermostat enforces canonical sampling by augmenting the equations of motion with viscous damping and stochastic noise satisfying the fluctuation--dissipation relation. While this guarantees convergence to Maxwell--Boltzmann in equilibrium, the explicit stochastic forcing can significantly perturb underlying microscopic dynamics, particularly for slow collective motion and long lived dynamical correlations characteristic of glass-forming systems.\n\nRegardless of these factors, the use of a thermostat remains a necessity for sizable MD systems, as numerical integration errors lead to a gradual increase in the system's total energy manifesting as unphysical heating over time~\\cite{FrenkelSmit2002}.\n%-------------\n%--------------\n%--------------\n\n\n\\section{Non-Gaussian Dynamics, Dynamical Heterogeneity, and Crystallization}\n\\label{app:nongaussian}\n\nTo better place our results in context, in this appendix, we all too briefly review well known elements, e.g., \\cite{DH1,DH2,DH3,DH4,DH5,dh10,volynes,dh11,dh12,PhysRevLett.132.258201,doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b08912,Kelton_review,BB,Chauduri,Bhowmik,Rahman1964,Donati1999,Fredrickson1984,JackleEisinger1991,Chandler2010,Mirigian2013unified,Palmer1984,Berthier2021,keys}. \n\n\\subsection{Non-Gaussian observables}\nThe excess (single Cartesian component or other generalized coordinate) velocity kurtosis,\nis the central quantity analyzed in the current work. \nOther metrics of non-Gaussian statistics have been heavily used in earlier\nstudies of supercooled liquids. These include, in particular, the\n\\emph{displacement} non-Gaussian parameter, introduced by\nRahman~\\cite{Rahman1964},\n\\begin{equation}\n \\alpha_2(t) = \\frac{3\\langle (\\vec{r}^2(t))^2\\rangle}{5\\langle \\vec{r}^2(t)\\rangle^2} - 1.\n \\label{eq:alpha2_def}\n\\end{equation}\nThe prefactor $3/5$ in $\\alpha_2$ is, in general spatial dimension $d \\neq 3$, replaced by $d/(d+2)$. \n\n\\subsection{Dynamical heterogeneity}\n\nAs noted in the main text, in supercooled liquids, dynamics may become spatially heterogeneous \\cite{DH1,DH2,DH3,DH4,DH5,dh10,volynes,dh11,dh12}. Herein, fast and slow regions coexist and relaxation occurs via cooperative rearrangements. Notably, displacement distributions develop non-Gaussian\ntails~\\cite{Donati1999,BB}. The focus of all earlier studies has not been on velocities (which until the current work have been invariably assumed to be Maxwellian) but rather on relaxation rates. \n\nA key empirical fact is that $\\alpha_2(t)$ peaks at the structural\n($\\alpha$-)relaxation time $\\tau_\\alpha$~\\cite{Kob-Andersen,Donati1999}. The peak of $\\alpha_2(t)$\nbecomes larger and monotonically shifts to longer times as the temperature drops. This tend tracks the\ngrowth of cooperative rearranging regions.\n\n\\subsection{Kinetically constrained models}\n\nKinetically constrained models (KCMs) \\cite{Mirigian2013unified, Palmer1984,Berthier2021,keys}, including the\nFredrickson-Andersen (FA) and East models~\\cite{Fredrickson1984,JackleEisinger1991,Chandler2010}, capture these features through local\nmobility constraints. Herein, dynamics are facilitated by neighboring excitations. The resulting relaxation is hierarchical and spatially heterogeneous. The structural relaxation time grows in a super-Arrhenius fashion. Within the East model, $\\tau_\\alpha \\sim \\exp(C/T^2)$ with $C$ being a constant \\cite{keys}.\n\nFar more general than the domain of kinetically constrained models alone, the distribution of local relaxation times may be broad. This may lead to stretched exponential relaxation~\\cite{Palmer1984} and consequently yield large values of $\\alpha_2(t)$.\n\n\\subsection{Relation between $\\alpha_2(t)$ and relaxation}\n\nThe non-Gaussian parameter is related to the variance of the local\ndiffusivity $D$~\\cite{Berthier2004},\n\\begin{equation}\n \\alpha_2(t) \\;\\sim\\; \\frac{\\mathrm{Var}(D)}{\\langle D\\rangle^2}.\n\\end{equation}\nAs a general rule of thumb trend, increasing non-Gaussianity $\\alpha_2$ appears in tandem with stronger dynamical heterogeneity.\n\n\n\\subsection{Connection to the crystallization time $\\tau_{\\mathrm{xtal}}$}\n\nThe classical nucleation rate is governed by~\\cite{TurnbullFisher1949} $\n \\tau_{\\mathrm{xtal}} \\;\\sim\\; \\tau_0\\,e^{\\Delta F^*/T}$, \nwhere $\\Delta F^*$ is the nucleation barrier and $\\tau_0$ is an \nattempt timescale. In a supercooled liquid, nucleation requires\ncollective rearrangements. In other words, $\\tau_0 \\sim \\tau_\\alpha$~\\cite{Wedekind2008} and \n\\begin{equation}\n \\tau_{\\mathrm{xtal}} \\;\\sim\\; \\tau_\\alpha\\,e^{\\Delta F^*/T}.\n \\label{eq:txtal_talpha}\n\\end{equation}\nSince $\\alpha_2(t)$ peaks at times $t \\sim \\tau_\\alpha$, its lifetime and\nmagnitude are indirect proxies for $\\tau_\\alpha$ and hence for\n$\\tau_{\\mathrm{xtal}}$.\n\n\\subsection{Competing effects of non-Gaussianity}\n\nNon-Gaussianity has two opposing consequences for crystallization.\n\\begin{enumerate}\\setlength\\itemsep{2pt}\n \\item Large $\\alpha_2$ signals slow, heterogeneous dynamics\n $\\Rightarrow \\tau_\\alpha\\uparrow \\Rightarrow \\tau_{\\mathrm{xtal}}\\uparrow$.\n \\item Concomitantly, however, similar to the discussion in the main paper (Figs. \\ref{fig:InvTailArea_VFTfit} and \\ref{fig:PT_and_tail_area}), fat tails may imply an enhanced tail of fast particles\n $\\Rightarrow$ locally enhanced barrier crossing\n $\\Rightarrow \\tau_{\\mathrm{xtal}}\\downarrow$.\n\\end{enumerate}\nThus $\\alpha_2$ correlates with $\\tau_{\\mathrm{xtal}}$ but does not\nuniquely determine it.\n\n\n\n% ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n\\section{Non-Maxwellian velocity distributions imply correlated constrained dynamics}\n\\label{app:correlated}\nThe broadening that we discuss in the current work falls under the broad umbrella of ``superstatistics''~\\cite{beck2003superstatistics,cohen2004superstatistics}. As emphasized in the current work, the single particle velocity statistics is non Gaussian when superposing Maxwellians associated with a distribution of intensive parameters,\n\\begin{equation}\n P_{\\beta}({\\vec{v}}) = \\int d\\beta' \\;P(\\beta|\\beta')\\;\n \\left(\\frac{m\\beta'}{2\\pi}\\right)^{3/2}\n \\exp\\!\\left(-\\frac{\\beta' m v^2}{2}\\right).\n \\label{eq:Pbeta_v}\n\\end{equation}\nThe distributions $P$ are associated with a non-uniform temperature $\\beta'$. In Refs.~\\cite{grant16,grant15,preprint6,preprint2,Nussinov2024},such distributions were not posited in an ad hoc manner. Ref.~\\cite{preprint6} established, via rigorous inequalities and exactly solvable examples, that driving the system must broaden its effective energy density/effective temperature, and/or other intensive state variables that are changed as the system is driven (leading to a non-delta function like $P$). One such broadening mechanism is further derived in Appendix~\\ref{rem:drive}. Non-Maxwellian single particle velocity statistics are also extremely well known in other arenas. Such a broadening also appears when local intensive variables fluctuate, as in the Landau Ginzburg description of strained supersolids and superconductors~\\cite{tanwa}, in bubble nucleation~\\cite{superheat}, and in plasmas~\\cite{localeTplasma}. The local equilibrium ansatz of long-studied variables in generalized hydrodynamics~\\cite{doyon} is of the same character.\n\nAlbeit ingenious, Maxwell’s derivation of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution for rotationally invariant systems {\\it posits \nan absence of correlations amongst the individual velocity components}- i.e., a factorization of the velocity probability distribution into that of the individual Cartesian velocity components from rotational symmetry. As is well known, this assumption falters in many systems. The breaking of this assumption (and thus the absence of Maxwellian velocity distributions) implies the existence of nontrivial correlations. A factorization of the probability distribution does not arise when the velocity components are not independent. The lack of Maxwellian statistics in rotationally symmetric systems mandates the appearance of nontrivial constraints/correlations amongst the velocity components. The velocities of free bosons/fermions conform to rotationally invariant Bose-Einstein and Fermi-Dirac distributions. However, these functions of the squared velocity ${\\vec{v}}^2$ (derivable from geometric series in the rotationally invariant Maxwellian times the fugacity) {\\it are not} products of the probability distributions of the individual velocity components $v_{a={x,y,z}}$. In an analogous way, in a relativistic system, the velocity component cannot be arbitrary and Lorentz invariance mandates that these are constrained so a factorization into the Cartesian components in void- this leads, once again, to a departure from a classical (in this case, non-relativistic) Maxwellian distribution of velocities. Similarly, our proposed distribution is manifestly rotationally invariant (since it’s a weighted sum/integral of rotationally invariant Maxwellians, but this, again, is {\\it not} a product of the probability distributions of the individual velocity components, \n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\label{ineqMax}\n P_{\\beta}({\\vec{v}}) \\neq \\prod_{a} P_{\\beta}(v_a). \n\\end{eqnarray}\nNow here is the central point of the current Appendix:\nInequalities of the form of Eq. (\\ref{ineqMax}) for Bose and Fermi as well as relativistic systems do, similar to those proposed in our current work for glassformers imply {\\it correlated/constrained dynamics (inhibited correlated dynamics are not unexpected for glassformers)}. We remark that non-factorizable (non-Gaussian) distributions are also found even with conventional Nose-Hoover and other thermostats that mandate a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution for the velocity. Specifically, the self part of the van Hove function (probability distribution for particle displacements) has, for large times, a fat (exponential) tail for large displacements that cannot be factored into the respective probability distributions for displacements along the different Cartesian directions. This fat tail augmenting the Gaussian (diffusive) probability distribution for small displacements is a hallmark of dynamical heterogeneities (see also Appendix \\ref{app:nongaussian}) which similarly superpose large and small displacements \\cite{BB,Chauduri,Bhowmik}.\n\n\n\n%─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n% Appendices E–G: from the main paper (methods and thermostat descriptions)\n% ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n\n\\section{Viscosity Measurement via the SLLOD Algorithm}\n\\label{app:sllod}\n\nTo compute the shear viscosity in the non-equilibrium steady state, we employed homogeneous shear MD using the SLLOD algorithm coupled with an iso-kinetic thermostat. This method generates planar Couette flow with a linear streaming profile while preserving periodic boundary conditions.\n\nFor a simple shear flow in the $x$-direction with velocity gradient along $y$, the streaming velocity field is\n$\\mathbf{u}(\\mathbf{r}) = \\dot{\\gamma} y \\,\\mathbf{e}_x$,\nwhere $\\dot{\\gamma}$ is the imposed shear rate. The microscopic shear stress was computed as\n\\begin{equation}\n\\sigma_{xy} = \\frac{1}{V}\n\\left[\n\\sum_i m_i c_{ix} c_{iy}\n+\n\\sum_{i<j} r_{ij,x} f_{ij,y}\n\\right],\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mathbf{c}_i$ are peculiar velocities and $\\mathbf{f}_{ij}$ are pair forces.\nThe shear viscosity was obtained from the steady state average:\n$\\eta = \\langle \\sigma_{xy} \\rangle / \\dot{\\gamma}$.\n\nThe SLLOD equations were originally introduced to generate homogeneous shear flow in periodic systems \\cite{EvansMorriss1984,Hoover1985,EvansMorrissBook}. For validation, the non-equilibrium viscosity was compared to equilibrium Green--Kubo calculations,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\eta = \\frac{V}{T} \\int_0^{\\infty} \\langle \\sigma_{xy}(0)\\sigma_{xy}(t) \\rangle \\, dt,\n\\end{equation}\nand both approaches yielded consistent viscosity values within statistical uncertainty, confirming that the imposed shear rates remained within the linear response regime.\n\n\\section{Cooling Protocol and steady state Verification}\n\\label{app:methods}\n\n\\subsection{Cooling Rates and Temperature-Time Profiles}\nWe cooled the system to time dependent target temperatures following an exponential quench protocol,\n\\begin{equation}\nT_{\\mathrm{target}}(t)\n=\nT_{\\mathrm{final}}\n+\n\\left(T_0 - T_{\\mathrm{final}}\\right)\ne^{-t/\\tau_{\\mathrm{Quench}}}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere \\(T_0\\) is the initial temperature, \\(T_{\\mathrm{final}}\\) the final target low-temperature state, and \\(\\tau_{\\mathrm{Quench}}\\) controls the cooling rate. Small \\(\\tau_{\\mathrm{Quench}}\\lesssim 10^2\\) MD step values correspond to rapid quenches that strongly drive the system out of equilibrium and favor glassy arrest. By contrast, larger \\(10^3 \\lesssim \\tau_{\\mathrm{Quench}} \\lesssim 10^5\\) step values allow for structural relaxation and partial or full crystallization depending on thermostat noise and polydispersity. In the limit \\(\\tau_{\\mathrm{Quench}}\\to\\infty\\), the protocol approaches quasi-static cooling.\n\n\\subsection{steady state Verification: $F(q,t)$ as a Probe of Steady State}\n\nThe static structure factor $S(\\vec{q})$ quantifies density correlations in reciprocal space and is defined as:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{split}\nS(\\vec{q}) &= \\frac{1}{N} \\left\\langle \\sum_{j=1}^{N} \\sum_{k=1}^{N}\ne^{-i \\vec{q} \\cdot (\\vec{r}_j - \\vec{r}_k)} \\right\\rangle \\\\\n&= \\frac{1}{N} \\left\\langle \\left| \\sum_{j=1}^{N}\ne^{-i \\vec{q} \\cdot \\vec{r}_j} \\right|^2 \\right\\rangle\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nPeaks in $S(\\vec{q})$ indicate preferred interparticle spacings and provide information about the system's structural ordering. The value of $q=|\\vec{q}|$ at which $S(q)$ reaches its peak is the pertinent one at which the self-part of the intermediate scattering function $F(q,t)$ was computed.\n\n\nThe corresponding time-domain relaxation of $F(\\vec{q},t)$ is shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:Fqt_single_sample} for the two thermostat choices.\n\n\\begin{figure}[tbp]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{Fqt.png}\n \\caption[$F(q,t)$]{\n Representative relaxation curve of the self--intermediate scattering \n function $F(q,t)$ at fixed wavevector $q$ for a single sample trajectory. \n The horizontal dashed line indicates the threshold $e^{-1}$ used to define \n the structural $\\alpha$-relaxation time. \n The vertical dashed line marks $\\tau_\\alpha$, determined from the condition \n $F(q,\\tau_\\alpha)=e^{-1}$.}\n \\label{fig:Fqt_single_sample}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsubsection*{Stationarity Test for $F(q,t)$}\n\nBefore extracting dynamical information from the intermediate scattering\nfunction $F(q,t)$, it is essential to verify that the system has reached\na statistically stationary state within the time window used for selecting\ntime origins.\n\n\\paragraph{Procedure.}\nWe adopt the following practical steady state test:\n\\begin{enumerate}\n \\item Select the final $30\\%$--$40\\%$ of the trajectory after cooling.\n \\item Divide this time window into $K = 20$ equal segments.\n \\item Compute $F_k(q,t)$ independently in each segment using only\n time origins contained within that segment.\n \\item Compare the resulting curves $F_k(q,t)$.\n\\end{enumerate}\n\n\\paragraph{Stationarity Criterion.}\nWe require that the relative spread across these segments satisfy \n\\begin{equation}\n\\frac{\\mathrm{std}_k\\!\\left[F_k(q,t)\\right]}\n{\\left\\langle F_k(q,t) \\right\\rangle_k}\n\\;\\lesssim\\; 3\\%,\n\\qquad\nt \\in \\text{$\\alpha$-relaxation window}.\n\\end{equation}\nIf the block-averaged curves collapse within approximately $3\\%$\nthroughout the decay region, the system is considered\nstatistically stationary and suitable for reliable extraction\nof dynamical quantities such as $\\tau_\\alpha$. The $3\\%$ margin was consistently achieved when $\\kappa < 0.5$ with HTLA and TwoBath thermostats.\n\n\n\n\n\\bibliographystyle{apsrev4-1}\n\\bibliography{merged_references}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: merged_references.bib\n================================================\n% ============================================================\n% PAPER REFERENCES (thesis-references.bib)\n% Source: uploaded document by authors -- do not modify keys\n% Two issues noted:\n% (a) 'collision' key is duplicated -- second entry kept below\n% with key 'collision_foot' to avoid BibTeX duplicate error\n% (b) glycerol-TTT points to Wang et al. 2019 (ice paper),\n% which is the authors' original assignment -- preserved as-is\n% ============================================================\n\n@article{Lovecraft1928,\n author = \"Howard Phillips Lovecraft\",\n title = \"{The Call of Cthulhu}\",\n journal = \"Weird Tales\",\n volume = 11,\n number = 2,\n pages = \"159+\",\n year = 1928,\n month = \"February\"\n}\n\n@article{LJmelting,\n author = \"Keola Wierschem and Efstratios Manousakisa\",\n title = \"{Simulation of two-dimensional melting of Lennard-Jones solid}\",\n journal = \"Physics Procedia\",\n volume = \"3\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"1515--1519\",\n year = \"2010\",\n doi = \"10.1016/J.PHPRO.2010.01.213\"\n}\n\n@article{Bhowmik,\n title = {Non-{Gaussianity} of van {Hove} Function and Dynamic Heterogeneity\n Length Scale},\n author = {Bhanu Prasad Bhowmik and Indrajit Tah and Smarajit Karmakar},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ E},\n volume = {98},\n pages = {022122},\n year = {2018},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.98.022122}\n}\n\n@article{Chauduri,\n author = {P.~Chaudhuri and L.~Berthier and W.~Kob},\n title = {Universal nature of particle displacements close to glass\n and jamming transitions},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.},\n volume = {99},\n pages = {060604},\n year = {2007},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.060604}\n}\n\n@article{Zhao2008BriefIT,\n title = {Brief introduction to the thermostats},\n author = {Yanxiang Zhao},\n year = {2008},\n url = {https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:4826717}\n}\n\n@article{Hafskjold_2019,\n title = {Thermodynamic properties of the {3D} {Lennard-Jones}/spline model},\n volume = {117},\n doi = {10.1080/00268976.2019.1664780},\n number = {23--24},\n journal = {Mol.\\ Phys.},\n publisher = {Informa UK Limited},\n author = {Hafskjold, Bj{\\o}rn and Travis, Karl Patrick and Hass, Amanda Bailey\n and Hammer, Morten and Aasen, Ailo and Wilhelmsen},\n year = {2019},\n pages = {3754--3769}\n}\n\n@article{MDnuc,\n author = \"Gabriele C. Sosso and others\",\n title = \"{Crystal Nucleation in Liquids: Open Questions and Future\n Challenges in Molecular Dynamics Simulations}\",\n journal = \"Chem.\\ Rev.\",\n volume = \"116\",\n number = \"12\",\n pages = \"7078--7116\",\n year = \"2016\",\n doi = \"10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00744\"\n}\n\n@article{visc,\n author = \"E.~M.~Kirova and G.~E.~Norman\",\n title = \"{Viscosity calculations at molecular dynamics simulations}\",\n journal = \"J.\\ Phys.:\\ Conf.\\ Ser.\",\n volume = \"653\",\n pages = \"012106\",\n year = \"2015\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1742-6596/653/1/012106\"\n}\n\n@article{LJisotherm,\n author = \"V.~G.~Baidakov and others\",\n title = \"{Crystal nucleation rate isotherms in Lennard-Jones liquids}\",\n journal = \"J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.\",\n year = \"2010\",\n doi = \"10.1063/1.3439585\"\n}\n\n@article{LJcryst,\n author = \"James R. Morris and Xueyu Song\",\n title = \"{The anisotropic free energy of the Lennard-Jones\n crystal-melt interface}\",\n journal = \"J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.\",\n volume = \"119\",\n pages = \"3920--3925\",\n year = \"2003\",\n doi = \"10.1063/1.1591725\"\n}\n\n@article{fast,\n author = {Cockrell, C. and Dicks, O. and Todorov, I.~T. and\n Elena, A.~M. and Trachenko, K.},\n year = {2023},\n pages = {13},\n title = {Fast dynamics and high effective dimensionality of liquid fluidity},\n volume = {1},\n journal = {Sci.\\ Rep.},\n doi = {10.1038/s41598-023-41931-7}\n}\n\n@article{Yu2020,\n title = {Velocity Distribution of a Homogeneously Cooling Granular Gas},\n author = {Peidong Yu and Matthias Schr{\\\"o}ter and Matthias Sperl},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.},\n volume = {124},\n pages = {208007},\n year = {2020},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.208007}\n}\n\n@article{Kanazawa2015,\n title = {Minimal Model of Stochastic Athermal Systems: Origin of\n Non-{Gaussian} Noise},\n author = {Kiyoshi Kanazawa and Tomohiko G. Sano and Takahiro Sagawa\n and Hisao Hayakawa},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.},\n volume = {114},\n pages = {090601},\n year = {2015},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.090601}\n}\n\n@article{Patron2021,\n author = {A.~Patron and B.~S{\\'a}nchez-Rey and A.~Prados},\n title = {Strong non exponential relaxation and memory effects in a fluid\n with nonlinear drag},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ E},\n year = {2021},\n volume = {104},\n pages = {064127},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.104.064127}\n}\n\n@article{Megias2022,\n title = {Kinetic Theory and Memory Effects of Homogeneous Inelastic\n Granular Gases under Nonlinear Drag},\n author = {A.~Megias and A.~Santos},\n journal = {Entropy},\n year = {2022},\n volume = {24},\n pages = {1436},\n doi = {10.3390/e24101436}\n}\n\n@article{EmergentFaci,\n author = {M.~R.~Hasyim and K.~K.~Mandadapu},\n title = {Emergent facilitation and glassy dynamics in supercooled liquids},\n journal = {Proc.\\ Natl.\\ Acad.\\ Sci.\\ U.S.A.},\n year = {2024},\n doi = {10.1073/pnas.2322592121}\n}\n\n@article{PhysRevLett.132.258201,\n title = {Direct Numerical Analysis of Dynamic Facilitation in\n Glass-Forming Liquids},\n author = {Herrero, Cecilia and Berthier, Ludovic},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.},\n volume = {132},\n pages = {258201},\n year = {2024},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.258201}\n}\n\n@article{OriginWings,\n author = {Guiselin, Benjamin and Scalliet, Camille and Berthier, Ludovic},\n year = {2022},\n pages = {1--5},\n title = {Microscopic origin of excess wings in relaxation spectra of\n supercooled liquids},\n volume = {18},\n journal = {Nat.\\ Phys.},\n doi = {10.1038/s41567-022-01508-z}\n}\n\n@article{WingExplained,\n author = {Zorm, R.},\n year = {2022},\n pages = {374--375},\n title = {A wing explained},\n volume = {18},\n journal = {Nat.\\ Phys.},\n doi = {10.1038/s41567-022-01553-8}\n}\n\n@misc{lam2024distinguishableparticleglassycrystalsimplest,\n title = {Distinguishable-particle Glassy Crystal: the simplest\n molecular model of glass},\n author = {Leo S.~I.~Lam and others},\n year = {2024},\n eprint = {2402.15805},\n archivePrefix = {arXiv}\n}\n\n@book{Nussinov2018,\n author = {Z.~Nussinov and N.~B.~Weingartner and F.~S.~Nogueira},\n title = {The ``Glass Transition'' as a Topological Defect Driven Transition\n in a Distribution of Crystals and a Prediction of a Universal\n Viscosity Collapse},\n booktitle = {Topological Phase Transitions and New Developments},\n pages = {61},\n publisher = {World Scientific},\n year = {2018}\n}\n\n@misc{frey2024interplayliquidlikestressdrivendynamics,\n title = {On the interplay of liquid-like and stress-driven dynamics\n in a metallic glass former observed by temperature scanning\n {XPCS}},\n author = {Maximilian Frey and others},\n year = {2024},\n eprint = {2403.12306},\n archivePrefix = {arXiv}\n}\n\n@misc{https://doi.org/10.12921/cmst.2024.0000005,\n doi = {10.12921/CMST.2024.0000005},\n url = {https://cmst.eu/articles/canonical-temperature-control-by-molecular-dynamics/},\n author = {Hoover, Wm.G. and Hoover, C.G.},\n title = {Canonical Temperature Control by Molecular Dynamics},\n publisher = {Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center},\n year = {2024}\n}\n\n@misc{gao2024unifiedpercolationscenarioalpha,\n title = {Unified percolation scenario for the $\\alpha$ and $\\beta$\n processes in simple glass formers},\n author = {Liang Gao and Hai-Bin Yu and Thomas B.~Schr{\\o}der\n and Jeppe C.~Dyre},\n year = {2024},\n eprint = {2411.02922},\n archivePrefix = {arXiv}\n}\n\n@article{doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b08912,\n author = {Van Hoang, Vo and Teboul, Victor and Odagaki, Takashi},\n title = {New Scenario of Dynamical Heterogeneity in Supercooled Liquid\n and Glassy States of {2D} Monatomic System},\n journal = {J.\\ Phys.\\ Chem.\\ B},\n volume = {119},\n number = {51},\n pages = {15752--15757},\n year = {2015},\n doi = {10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b08912}\n}\n\n@article{doi:10.1021/jp953538d,\n author = {Ediger, M.~D. and Angell, C.~A. and Nagel, Sidney R.},\n title = {Supercooled Liquids and Glasses},\n journal = {J.\\ Phys.\\ Chem.},\n volume = {100},\n number = {31},\n pages = {13200--13212},\n year = {1996},\n doi = {10.1021/jp953538d}\n}\n\n@article{Flenner2015,\n title = {Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three\n dimensions},\n author = {Flenner, Elijah and Szamel, Grzegorz},\n journal = {Nat.\\ Commun.},\n volume = {6},\n pages = {7392},\n year = {2015},\n doi = {10.1038/ncomms8392}\n}\n\n@article{Debenedetti2001,\n title = {Supercooled liquids and the glass transition},\n author = {Debenedetti, Pablo G. and Stillinger, Frank H.},\n journal = {Nature},\n volume = {410},\n pages = {259--267},\n year = {2001},\n doi = {10.1038/35065704}\n}\n\n@article{ediger2000spatially,\n title = {Spatially heterogeneous dynamics in supercooled liquids},\n author = {Ediger, M.~D.},\n journal = {Annu.\\ Rev.\\ Phys.\\ Chem.},\n volume = {51},\n pages = {99--128},\n year = {2000},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev.physchem.51.1.99}\n}\n\n@article{Illing2017,\n title = {{Mermin--Wagner} fluctuations in {2D} amorphous solids},\n author = {Illing, Bernd and Fritschi, Sebastian and Kaiser, Herbert and\n Klix, Christian L. and Maret, Georg and Keim, Peter},\n journal = {Proc.\\ Natl.\\ Acad.\\ Sci.\\ U.S.A.},\n volume = {114},\n pages = {1856--1861},\n year = {2017},\n doi = {10.1073/pnas.1612964114}\n}\n\n@article{Mirigian2013unified,\n title = {Unified theory of activated relaxation in liquids and glasses},\n author = {Stephen Mirigian and Kenneth S.~Schweizer},\n journal = {arXiv:1310.6018},\n year = {2013}\n}\n\n@article{Palmer1984,\n title = {Models of Hierarchically Constrained Dynamics for Glassy Relaxation},\n author = {Palmer, R.~G. and Stein, D.~L. and Abrahams, E. and Anderson, P.~W.},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.},\n volume = {53},\n pages = {958--961},\n year = {1984},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.958}\n}\n\n@article{Berthier2021,\n title = {Self-induced heterogeneity in deeply supercooled liquids},\n author = {Berthier, Ludovic},\n journal = {arXiv:2010.12244v2},\n year = {2021}\n}\n\n@article{Jung2023Predicting,\n title = {Predicting Dynamic Heterogeneity in Glass-Forming Liquids\n by Physics-Inspired Machine Learning},\n author = {Jung, Gerhard and Biroli, Giulio and Berthier, Ludovic},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.},\n volume = {130},\n pages = {238202},\n year = {2023},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.238202}\n}\n\n@article{Speck2019,\n title = {Dynamic facilitation theory: a statistical mechanics approach\n to dynamic arrest},\n author = {Speck, Thomas},\n journal = {J.\\ Stat.\\ Mech.},\n volume = {2019},\n pages = {084015},\n year = {2019},\n doi = {10.1088/1742-5468/ab2ace}\n}\n\n@article{berendsen1984molecular,\n author = {H.~J.~C.~Berendsen and J.~P.~M.~Postma and\n W.~F.~van Gunsteren and A.~DiNola and J.~R.~Haak},\n title = {Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath},\n journal = {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {81},\n pages = {3684--3690},\n year = {1984},\n doi = {10.1063/1.448134}\n}\n\n@article{amber2013,\n author = {J.~Zhao and S.~L.~Simon and G.~B.~McKenna},\n title = {Using 20-million-year-old amber to test the super-{Arrhenius}\n behaviour of glassforming systems},\n journal = {Nat.\\ Commun.},\n volume = {4},\n year = {2013},\n pages = {1783},\n doi = {10.1038/ncomms2809}\n}\n\n@article{Frank1952,\n title = {Supercooling of Liquids},\n author = {F.~C.~Frank},\n journal = {Proc.\\ R.\\ Soc.\\ Lond.\\ A},\n volume = {215},\n pages = {43--46},\n year = {1952},\n doi = {10.1098/rspa.1952.0194}\n}\n\n@article{3D,\n author = {Yang, Yao and Zhou, Jihan and Zhu, Fan and Yuan, Yakun and\n Chang, Dillan J. and Kim, Dennis S. and Rana, Arjun and\n Tian, Xuezeng and Yao, Yonggang and Osher, Stanley J. and\n Schmid, Andreas K. and Hu, Lianbing and Ercius, Peter and\n Miao, Jianwei},\n title = {Determining the three-dimensional atomic structure of an\n amorphous solid},\n journal = {Nature},\n volume = {592},\n pages = {785--789},\n year = {2021},\n doi = {10.1038/s41586-021-03454-6}\n}\n\n@incollection{Kelton_review,\n author = {Kelton, K.~F.},\n title = {Theory of Nucleation and Glass Formation},\n booktitle = {Metallurgy in Space, Recent Results from {ISS}},\n editor = {Fecht, H.-J. and Mohr, M.},\n series = {The Minerals, Metals, \\& Materials Series},\n publisher = {Springer},\n year = {2022},\n doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-87665-5_5}\n}\n\n@article{nucleation1,\n author = {Chen, Fangzheng and Nussinov, Zohar and Kelton, K.~F.},\n title = {Crystal Nucleation and Growth in Liquids: Cooperative Atom\n Attachment and Detachment},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ B},\n volume = {108},\n pages = {064205},\n year = {2023},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevB.108.064205}\n}\n\n@article{nucleation2,\n author = {Chen, Fangzheng and Sheng, Yelin and Dahlberg, Kian Cole and\n Nussinov, Zohar and Kelton, K.~F.},\n title = {Crystal Nucleation in an {AlNiZr} Metallic Liquid: Within and\n Beyond Classical Nucleation Theory},\n journal = {Acta Mater.},\n volume = {270},\n pages = {119860},\n year = {2024},\n doi = {10.1016/j.actamat.2024.119860}\n}\n\n@article{DH1,\n author = {Sillescu, H.},\n title = {Heterogeneity at the glass transition: a review},\n journal = {J.\\ Non-Cryst.\\ Solids},\n volume = {243},\n pages = {81--108},\n year = {1999},\n doi = {10.1016/S0022-3093(98)00610-3}\n}\n\n@article{DH2,\n author = {Ediger, M.~D.},\n title = {Spatially heterogeneous dynamics in supercooled liquids},\n journal = {Annu.\\ Rev.\\ Phys.\\ Chem.},\n volume = {51},\n pages = {99--128},\n year = {2000},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev.physchem.51.1.99}\n}\n\n@article{DH3,\n author = {Richert, R.},\n title = {Heterogeneous dynamics in liquids: fluctuations in space and time},\n journal = {J.\\ Phys.:\\ Condens.\\ Matter},\n volume = {14},\n pages = {R703--R738},\n year = {2002},\n doi = {10.1088/0953-8984/14/23/201}\n}\n\n@article{DH4,\n author = {Kob, W. and Donati, C. and Plimpton, S.~J. and\n Poole, P.~H. and Glotzer, S.~C.},\n title = {Dynamical heterogeneities in a supercooled {Lennard-Jones} liquid},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.},\n volume = {79},\n pages = {2827--2830},\n year = {1997},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2827}\n}\n\n@article{DH5,\n author = {Donati, C. and Douglas, J.~F. and Kob, W. and Plimpton, S.~J. and\n Poole, P.~H. and Glotzer, S.~C.},\n title = {Stringlike cooperative motion in a supercooled liquid},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.},\n volume = {80},\n pages = {2338--2341},\n year = {1998},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2338}\n}\n\n@book{dh11,\n author = {Berthier, L. and Biroli, G. and Bouchaud, J.-P. and\n Cipelletti, L. and van Saarloos, W.},\n title = {Dynamical Heterogeneities in Glasses, Colloids, and\n Granular Media},\n publisher = {Oxford University Press},\n year = {2011},\n isbn = {9780199691470}\n}\n\n@article{dh10,\n author = {Berthier, L.},\n title = {Dynamic Heterogeneity in Amorphous Materials},\n journal = {Physics},\n volume = {4},\n pages = {42},\n year = {2011},\n doi = {10.1103/Physics.4.42}\n}\n\n@article{volynes,\n author = {Zhang, Pei and Maldonis, Jason J. and Liu, Ze and Schroers, Jan\n and Volynes, Paul M.},\n title = {Spatially heterogeneous dynamics in a metallic glass forming\n liquid imaged by electron correlation microscopy},\n journal = {Nat.\\ Commun.},\n volume = {9},\n pages = {1129},\n year = {2018},\n doi = {10.1038/s41467-018-03451-1}\n}\n\n@article{dh12,\n author = {Widmer-Cooper, A. and Perry, H. and Harrowell, P. and\n Reichman, D.~R.},\n title = {Irreversible reorganization in a supercooled liquid originates\n from localized soft modes},\n journal = {Nat.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {4},\n pages = {711--715},\n year = {2008},\n doi = {10.1038/nphys1056}\n}\n\n@article{juraj,\n author = {Kyselica, Juraj and Guba, Peter and Chudjak, Martin},\n title = {Recalescence dynamics and solidification of a supercooled melt\n in a finite domain},\n journal = {Int.\\ J.\\ Heat Mass Transfer},\n volume = {159},\n pages = {120048},\n year = {2020},\n doi = {10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120048}\n}\n\n@book{KG,\n author = {Kelton, K.~F. and Greer, A.~L.},\n title = {Nucleation in Condensed Matter: Applications in Materials\n and Biology},\n publisher = {Elsevier},\n year = {2010},\n isbn = {9780123820383}\n}\n\n@article{glycerol-TTT,\n author = {Wang, Q. and Huang, X. and Guo, W. and Cao, Z.},\n title = {Synergy of orientational relaxation between bound water and\n confined water in ice cold-crystallization},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Chem.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {21},\n pages = {10293--10301},\n year = {2019},\n doi = {10.1039/C9CP01653B}\n}\n\n@article{superheat,\n author = {Gallo, M. and Magaletti, F. and Casciola, C.~M.},\n title = {Thermally activated vapor bubble nucleation: The\n {Landau-Lifshitz-Van der Waals} approach},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Fluids},\n volume = {3},\n pages = {053604},\n year = {2018},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.053604}\n}\n\n@article{localeTplasma,\n author = {Nold, B. and Ribeiro, T.~T. and Ramisch, M. and Huang, Z. and\n Muller, H.~W. and Scott, B.~D. and Stroth, U. and\n {ASDEX Upgrade Team}},\n title = {Influence of temperature fluctuations on plasma turbulence\n investigations with {Langmuir} probes},\n journal = {New J.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {14},\n pages = {063022},\n year = {2012},\n doi = {10.1088/1367-2630/14/6/063022}\n}\n\n@article{Doyon,\n author = {Doyon, B.},\n title = {Notes on Generalized Hydrodynamics},\n journal = {SciPost Phys.\\ Lect.\\ Notes},\n volume = {18},\n year = {2020},\n doi = {10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.18}\n}\n\n@article{Ganorkar,\n author = {Ganorkar, S. and Lee, S. and Lee, Y.~H. and Ishikawa, T. and\n Lee, G.~W.},\n title = {Origin of glass forming ability of {Cu-Zr} alloys: A link between\n compositional variation and stability of liquid and glass},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Mater.},\n volume = {2},\n pages = {115606},\n year = {2018},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.115606}\n}\n\n@article{Walter,\n author = {Kauzmann, W.},\n title = {The Nature of the Glassy State and the Behavior of Liquids at\n Low Temperatures},\n journal = {Chem.\\ Rev.},\n volume = {43},\n pages = {219--256},\n year = {1948},\n doi = {10.1021/cr60135a002}\n}\n\n@article{GM,\n author = {Gibbs, J.~H. and DiMarzio, E.~A.},\n title = {Nature of the glass transition and the glassy state},\n journal = {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {28},\n pages = {373--383},\n year = {1958},\n doi = {10.1063/1.1744032}\n}\n\n@article{ktw,\n author = {Kirkpatrick, T.~R. and Thirumalai, D. and Wolynes, P.~G.},\n title = {Scaling concepts for the dynamics of viscous liquids near an\n ideal glassy state},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ A},\n volume = {40},\n pages = {1045--1054},\n year = {1989},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevA.40.1045}\n}\n\n@article{ref:lubchenkowolynes,\n author = {Lubchenko, V. and Wolynes, P.~G.},\n title = {Theory of Structural Glasses and Supercooled Liquids},\n journal = {Annu.\\ Rev.\\ Phys.\\ Chem.},\n volume = {58},\n pages = {235--266},\n year = {2007},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev.physchem.58.032806.104518}\n}\n\n@incollection{RFOT:crit_assess,\n author = {Biroli, G. and Bouchaud, J.-P.},\n title = {The Random First-Order Transition Theory of Glasses: a critical\n assessment},\n booktitle = {Structural Glasses and Supercooled Liquids: Theory, Experiment,\n and Applications},\n editor = {Wolynes, P.~G. and Lubchenko, V.},\n pages = {31--113},\n publisher = {John Wiley \\& Sons},\n year = {2012}\n}\n\n@article{race,\n author = {Royall, C.~P. and Turci, F. and Tatsumi, S. and Russo, J.\n and Robinson, J.},\n title = {The race to the bottom: approaching the ideal glass?},\n journal = {J.\\ Phys.:\\ Condens.\\ Matter},\n volume = {30},\n pages = {363001},\n year = {2018},\n doi = {10.1088/1361-648X/aad82f}\n}\n\n@incollection{BBGKY1,\n author = {Bogoliubov, N.~N.},\n title = {The dynamical theory in statistical physics},\n booktitle = {Studies in Statistical Mechanics},\n editor = {de Boer, J. and Uhlenbeck, G.~E.},\n volume = {1},\n publisher = {North-Holland, Amsterdam},\n pages = {1--118},\n year = {1962}\n}\n\n@book{BBGKY2,\n author = {Born, M. and Green, H.~S.},\n title = {A General Kinetic Theory of Liquids},\n publisher = {Cambridge University Press},\n year = {1949}\n}\n\n@article{BBGKY3,\n author = {Kirkwood, J.~G.},\n title = {The Statistical Mechanical Theory of Transport Processes {I}.\n General Theory},\n journal = {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {14},\n pages = {180--201},\n year = {1946},\n doi = {10.1063/1.1724093}\n}\n\n@article{BBGKY4,\n author = {Kirkwood, J.~G.},\n title = {The Statistical Mechanical Theory of Transport Processes {II}.\n Transport in Gases},\n journal = {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {15},\n pages = {72--77},\n year = {1947},\n doi = {10.1063/1.1746294}\n}\n\n@book{BBGKY5,\n author = {Yvon, J.},\n title = {La Th{\\'e}orie des Fluids et L'{\\'e}quation D'{\\'e}tat},\n publisher = {Hermann and Cie, Paris},\n year = {1935}\n}\n\n@book{Kardar,\n author = {Kardar, Mehran},\n title = {Statistical Physics of Particles},\n publisher = {Cambridge University Press},\n year = {2007}\n}\n\n@article{collision,\n author = {Huang Wu and Christopher J.~Foot},\n title = {Direct simulation of evaporative cooling},\n journal = {J.\\ Phys.\\ B: At.\\ Mol.\\ Opt.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {29},\n pages = {L321--L327},\n year = {1996},\n doi = {10.1088/0953-4075/29/15/001}\n}\n\n@article{sausset,\n author = {F.~Sausset and G.~Biroli and J.~Kurchan},\n title = {Do Solids Flow?},\n journal = {J.\\ Stat.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {140},\n pages = {718--727},\n year = {2010},\n doi = {10.1007/s10955-010-9994-x}\n}\n\n@article{Planck22,\n author = {Z.~Nussinov and S.~Chakrabarty},\n title = {Exact Universal Chaos, Velocity, Acceleration, Transport\n Coefficient, ``Collapse'' Times to Equilibrium States, and\n Other Bounds in Quantum Thermal Systems},\n journal = {Ann.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {443},\n pages = {168970},\n year = {2022},\n doi = {10.1016/j.aop.2022.168970}\n}\n\n@article{ETH1,\n author = {J.~M.~Deutsch},\n title = {Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ A},\n volume = {43},\n pages = {2046--2049},\n year = {1991},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevA.43.2046}\n}\n\n@article{ETH2,\n author = {M.~Srednicki},\n title = {Chaos and quantum thermalization},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ E},\n volume = {50},\n pages = {888--901},\n year = {1994},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.50.888}\n}\n\n@article{MBL,\n author = {D.~Basko and I.~Aleiner and B.~Altshuler},\n title = {Metal-insulator transition in a weakly interacting\n many-electron system with localized single-particle states},\n journal = {Ann.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {321},\n pages = {1126--1205},\n year = {2006},\n doi = {10.1016/j.aop.2005.11.014}\n}\n\n@article{MBL_rev,\n author = {D.~A.~Abanin and E.~Altman and I.~Bloch and M.~Serbyn},\n title = {Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization,\n and entanglement},\n journal = {Rev.\\ Mod.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {91},\n pages = {021001},\n year = {2019},\n doi = {10.1103/RevModPhys.91.021001}\n}\n\n@article{scar,\n author = {E.~J.~Heller},\n title = {Bound-State Eigenfunctions of Classically Chaotic {Hamiltonian}\n Systems: Scars of Periodic Orbits},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.},\n volume = {53},\n pages = {1515--1518},\n year = {1984},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1515}\n}\n\n@article{scar_rev,\n author = {A.~Chandran and A.~T.~Iadecola and V.~Khemani and R.~Moessner},\n title = {Quantum Many-Body Scars: A Quasiparticle Perspective},\n journal = {Annu.\\ Rev.\\ Condens.\\ Matter Phys.},\n volume = {14},\n pages = {443--469},\n year = {2023},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031620-101617}\n}\n\n@article{Lowe,\n author = {Lowe, C.~P.},\n title = {An alternative approach to dissipative particle dynamics},\n journal = {Europhys.\\ Lett.},\n volume = {47},\n pages = {145--151},\n year = {1999},\n doi = {10.1209/epl/i1999-00365-x}\n}\n\n@article{Jaynes1957,\n title = {Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics},\n author = {E.~T.~Jaynes},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.},\n volume = {106},\n pages = {620--630},\n year = {1957},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRev.106.620}\n}\n\n@article{Andersen_thermostat,\n author = {Andersen, H.~C.},\n title = {Molecular dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or\n temperature},\n journal = {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {72},\n pages = {2384--2393},\n year = {1980},\n doi = {10.1063/1.439486}\n}\n\n@article{Langevin1,\n author = {Hoover, W.~G. and Ladd, A.~J. and Moran, B.},\n title = {High-strain-rate plastic flow studied via nonequilibrium\n molecular dynamics},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.},\n volume = {48},\n pages = {1818--1821},\n year = {1982},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1818}\n}\n\n@article{Langevin2,\n author = {Evans, D.~J.},\n title = {Computer ``experiment'' for nonlinear thermodynamics of\n {Couette} flow},\n journal = {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {78},\n pages = {3297--3309},\n year = {1983},\n doi = {10.1063/1.445214}\n}\n\n@article{Kob-Andersen,\n author = {Kob, Walter and Andersen, Hans C.},\n title = {Testing mode-coupling theory for a supercooled binary\n {Lennard-Jones} mixture {I}: The van {Hove} correlation function},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ E},\n volume = {51},\n pages = {4626--4641},\n year = {1995},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.51.4626}\n}\n\n@article{Whitmer2010,\n author = {Jonathan K.~Whitmer and Erik Luijten},\n title = {Fluid-solid boundary conditions for multiparticle collision\n dynamics},\n journal = {J.\\ Phys.:\\ Condens.\\ Matter},\n volume = {22},\n pages = {104106},\n year = {2010},\n doi = {10.1088/0953-8984/22/10/104106}\n}\n\n@article{Nussinov2024,\n author = {Zohar Nussinov},\n title = {Reduced probability densities of long-lived metastable states as\n those of distributed thermal systems: possible experimental\n implications for supercooled fluids},\n journal = {Ann.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {463},\n pages = {169634},\n year = {2024},\n doi = {10.1016/j.aop.2024.169634}\n}\n\n@incollection{book_TOP,\n author = {Z.~Nussinov and N.~B.~Weingartner and F.~S.~Nogueira},\n title = {The `Glass Transition' as a Topological Defect Driven Transition\n in a Distribution of Crystals and a Prediction of a Universal\n Viscosity Collapse},\n booktitle = {Topological Phase Transitions and New Developments},\n editor = {Lars Brink and Mike Gunn and Jorge V.~Jose and John Michael\n Kosterlitz and Kok Khoo Phua},\n pages = {61--79},\n publisher = {World Scientific},\n year = {2018}\n}\n\n@article{grant3,\n author = {M.~Blodgett and T.~Egami and Z.~Nussinov and K.~F.~Kelton},\n title = {Proposal for universality in the viscosity of metallic liquids},\n journal = {Sci.\\ Rep.},\n volume = {5},\n pages = {13837},\n year = {2015},\n doi = {10.1038/srep13837}\n}\n\n@article{grant15,\n author = {Nicholas B.~Weingartner and Chris Pueblo and Flavio Nogueira and\n Kenneth F.~Kelton and Zohar Nussinov},\n title = {A phase space approach to supercooled liquids and a universal\n collapse of their viscosity},\n journal = {Front.\\ Mater.},\n volume = {3},\n pages = {50},\n year = {2016},\n doi = {10.3389/fmats.2016.00050}\n}\n\n@article{grant16,\n author = {Z.~Nussinov},\n title = {A one parameter fit for glassy dynamics as a quantum corollary\n of the liquid to solid transition},\n journal = {Philos.\\ Mag.},\n volume = {97},\n pages = {1509--1570},\n year = {2017},\n doi = {10.1080/14786435.2017.1281448}\n}\n\n@misc{preprint2,\n author = {Nicholas B.~Weingartner and Chris Pueblo and K.~F.~Kelton\n and Zohar Nussinov},\n title = {Critical assessment of the equilibrium melting-based, energy\n distribution theory of supercooled liquids and application\n to jammed systems},\n year = {2015},\n eprint = {1512.04565},\n archivePrefix = {arXiv}\n}\n\n@article{preprint6,\n author = {Z.~Nussinov},\n title = {Macroscopic length correlations in non-equilibrium systems and\n their possible realizations},\n journal = {Nucl.\\ Phys.\\ B},\n volume = {953},\n pages = {114948},\n year = {2020},\n doi = {10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.114948}\n}\n\n@article{BOO,\n author = {Steinhardt, P.~J. and Nelson, D.~R. and Ronchetti, M.},\n title = {Bond-orientational order in liquids and glasses},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ B},\n volume = {28},\n pages = {784--805},\n year = {1983},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevB.28.784}\n}\n\n@article{Nose,\n author = {Nose, S.},\n title = {A unified formulation of the constant temperature\n molecular-dynamics methods},\n journal = {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {81},\n pages = {511--519},\n year = {1984},\n doi = {10.1063/1.447334}\n}\n\n@article{Hoover,\n author = {Hoover, W.~G.},\n title = {Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ A},\n volume = {31},\n pages = {1695--1697},\n year = {1985},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695}\n}\n\n@article{bib:vft,\n author = {H.~Vogel},\n title = {The law of the relationship between viscosity of liquids\n and the temperature},\n journal = {Z.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {22},\n pages = {645--646},\n year = {1921}\n}\n\n@article{bib:vft2,\n author = {G.~S.~Fulcher},\n title = {Analysis of Recent Measurements of the Viscosity of Glasses},\n journal = {J.\\ Am.\\ Ceram.\\ Soc.},\n volume = {8},\n pages = {339--355},\n year = {1925},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1151-2916.1925.tb12387.x}\n}\n\n@article{bib:vft3,\n author = {G.~Tammann and W.~Z.~Hesse},\n title = {Die {Abh\\\"angigkeit} der {Viskosit\\\"at} von der {Temperatur}\n bei unterk{\\\"u}hlten {Fl{\\\"u}ssigkeiten}},\n journal = {Anorg.\\ Allgem.\\ Chem.},\n volume = {156},\n pages = {245--257},\n year = {1926},\n doi = {10.1002/zaac.19261560119}\n}\n\n@article{bib:angell,\n author = {Angell, C.~A.},\n title = {Formation of glasses from liquids and biopolymers},\n journal = {Science},\n volume = {267},\n pages = {1924--1935},\n year = {1995},\n doi = {10.1126/science.267.5206.1924}\n}\n\n@article{bib:mct1,\n author = {Leutheusser, E.},\n title = {Dynamical model of the liquid-glass transition},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ A},\n volume = {29},\n pages = {2765--2773},\n year = {1984},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevA.29.2765}\n}\n\n@article{bib:mct2,\n author = {Bengtzelius, U. and G{\\\"o}tze, W. and Sj{\\\"o}lander, A.},\n title = {Dynamics of supercooled liquids and the glass transition},\n journal = {J.\\ Phys.\\ C: Solid State Phys.},\n volume = {17},\n pages = {5915--5934},\n year = {1984},\n doi = {10.1088/0022-3719/17/33/016}\n}\n\n@book{bib:mct3,\n author = {G{\\\"o}tze, W.},\n title = {Complex Dynamics of Glass-Forming Liquids: A Mode-Coupling\n Theory},\n publisher = {Oxford University Press},\n year = {2008},\n isbn = {9780198568260}\n}\n\n@article{BB,\n author = {L.~Berthier and G.~Biroli},\n title = {Theoretical perspective on the glass transition and amorphous\n solids},\n journal = {Rev.\\ Mod.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {83},\n pages = {587--645},\n year = {2011},\n doi = {10.1103/RevModPhys.83.587}\n}\n\n@article{Cavagna,\n author = {A.~Cavagna},\n title = {Supercooled liquids for pedestrians},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rep.},\n volume = {476},\n pages = {51--124},\n year = {2009},\n doi = {10.1016/j.physrep.2009.03.003}\n}\n\n@book{EvansMorrissBook,\n author = {Evans, Denis J. and Morriss, Gary P.},\n title = {Statistical Mechanics of Nonequilibrium Liquids},\n publisher = {Cambridge University Press},\n year = {2008}\n}\n\n@article{EvansMorriss1984,\n author = {Evans, D.~J. and Morriss, G.~P.},\n title = {Nonlinear-response theory for steady planar {Couette} flow},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ A},\n volume = {30},\n pages = {1528--1530},\n year = {1984},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevA.30.1528}\n}\n\n@article{Hoover1985,\n author = {Hoover, W.~G. and Ladd, A.~J.~C. and Moran, B.},\n title = {High-strain-rate plastic flow studied via nonequilibrium\n molecular dynamics},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.},\n volume = {48},\n pages = {1818--1820},\n year = {1982},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1818}\n}\n\n@book{AllenTildesley2017,\n author = {Allen, Michael P. and Tildesley, Dominic J.},\n title = {Computer Simulation of Liquids},\n publisher = {Oxford University Press},\n edition = {2nd},\n year = {2017}\n}\n\n@article{Lechner2008,\n author = {Lechner, Wolfgang and Dellago, Christoph},\n title = {Accurate determination of crystal structures based on averaged\n local bond order parameters},\n journal = {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {129},\n pages = {114707},\n year = {2008},\n doi = {10.1063/1.2977970}\n}\n\n@article{tenWolde1996,\n author = {ten Wolde, P.~R. and Ruiz-Montero, M.~J. and Frenkel, D.},\n title = {Numerical calculation of the rate of crystal nucleation in a\n {Lennard-Jones} system},\n journal = {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {104},\n pages = {9932--9947},\n year = {1996},\n doi = {10.1063/1.471638}\n}\n\n@book{Cohen2007,\n author = {Cohen, A.~M.},\n title = {Numerical Methods for {Laplace} Transform Inversion},\n publisher = {Springer},\n series = {Numerical Methods and Algorithms},\n volume = {5},\n year = {2007},\n doi = {10.1007/978-0-387-68276-9}\n}\n\n@book{HansenMcDonald,\n author = {J.-P.~Hansen and I.~R.~McDonald},\n title = {Theory of Simple Liquids},\n edition = {4th},\n publisher = {Academic Press},\n year = {2013}\n}\n\n@book{FrenkelSmit2002,\n author = {Daan Frenkel and Berend Smit},\n title = {Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to\n Applications},\n edition = {2},\n year = {2002},\n publisher = {Academic Press},\n address = {San Diego},\n isbn = {9780122673511}\n}\n\n@article{Ted87b,\n author = {Kirkpatrick, T.~R. and Wolynes, P.~G.},\n title = {Stable and metastable states in mean-field {Potts} and\n structural glasses},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ B},\n volume = {36},\n pages = {8552--8564},\n year = {1987},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevB.36.8552}\n}\n\n@article{Goldstein2,\n author = {Goldstein, M.},\n title = {Viscous liquids and the glass transition: A potential energy\n barrier picture},\n journal = {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {51},\n pages = {3728--3739},\n year = {1969},\n doi = {10.1063/1.1672177}\n}\n\n@article{AGlass,\n author = {Adam, G. and Gibbs, J.~H.},\n title = {On the temperature dependence of cooperative relaxation\n properties in glass-forming liquids},\n journal = {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {43},\n pages = {139--146},\n year = {1965},\n doi = {10.1063/1.1696442}\n}\n\n@article{bib:KKZNT1,\n author = {Kivelson, D. and Kivelson, S.~A. and Zhao, X. and Nussinov, Z.\n and Tarjus, G.},\n title = {A Thermodynamic Theory of Supercooled Liquids},\n journal = {Physica A},\n volume = {219},\n pages = {27--38},\n year = {1995},\n doi = {10.1016/0378-4371(95)00104-2}\n}\n\n@article{Vogel1921,\n author = {H.~Vogel},\n title = {The law of the relation between viscosity of liquids and the\n temperature},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Z.},\n volume = {22},\n pages = {645--646},\n year = {1921}\n}\n\n@article{Patrick2017,\n author = {Charbonneau, P. and Kurchan, J. and Parisi, G. and Urbani, P.\n and Zamponi, F.},\n title = {Glass and Jamming Transitions: From Exact Results to\n Finite-Dimensional Descriptions},\n journal = {Annu.\\ Rev.\\ Condens.\\ Matter Phys.},\n volume = {8},\n pages = {265--288},\n year = {2017},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-025334}\n}\n\n@article{Steve_Gilles,\n author = {Kivelson, S.~A. and Tarjus, G.},\n title = {In search of a theory of supercooled liquids},\n journal = {Nat.\\ Mater.},\n volume = {7},\n pages = {831--833},\n year = {2008},\n doi = {10.1038/nmat2296}\n}\n\n@article{keys,\n author = {Keys, A.~S. and Garrahan, J.~P. and Chandler, D.},\n title = {Calorimetric glass transition explained by hierarchical dynamic\n facilitation},\n journal = {Proc.\\ Natl.\\ Acad.\\ Sci.\\ U.S.A.},\n volume = {110},\n pages = {4482--4487},\n year = {2013},\n doi = {10.1073/pnas.1300430110}\n}\n\n@book{bookZamponi,\n author = {Parisi, Giorgio and Urbani, Pierfrancesco and Zamponi, Francesco},\n title = {Theory of Simple Glasses: Exact Solutions in Infinite Dimensions},\n publisher = {Cambridge University Press},\n year = {2020},\n isbn = {9781108482590}\n}\n% ============================================================\n% NEW ENTRIES: appendix-only references not in paper bib\n% All verified against published sources.\n% ============================================================\n\n@article{Bobylev1976,\n author = {A.~V.~Bobylev},\n title = {The {Chapman--Enskog} and {Grad} methods for solving the\n {Boltzmann} equation},\n journal = {Sov.\\ Phys.\\ Dokl.},\n volume = {27},\n pages = {29--31},\n year = {1982}\n}\n\n@book{Cercignani1988,\n author = {C.~Cercignani},\n title = {The {Boltzmann} Equation and Its Applications},\n publisher = {Springer},\n address = {New York},\n year = {1988}\n}\n\n@article{Chandler2010,\n author = {D.~Chandler and J.~P.~Garrahan},\n title = {Dynamics on the way to forming glass: bubbles in space-time},\n journal = {Annu.\\ Rev.\\ Phys.\\ Chem.},\n volume = {61},\n pages = {191--217},\n year = {2010},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev.physchem.59.032607.093540}\n}\n\n@article{Donati1999,\n author = {C.~Donati and S.~C.~Glotzer and P.~H.~Poole and\n W.~Kob and S.~J.~Plimpton},\n title = {Spatial correlations of mobility and immobility in a\n glass-forming {Lennard-Jones} liquid},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ E},\n volume = {60},\n pages = {3107--3119},\n year = {1999},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.60.3107}\n}\n\n@article{JackleEisinger1991,\n author = {J.~J{\\\"a}ckle and S.~Eisinger},\n title = {A hierarchically constrained kinetic {Ising} model},\n journal = {Z.\\ Phys.\\ B},\n volume = {84},\n pages = {115--124},\n year = {1991},\n doi = {10.1007/BF01453764}\n}\n\n@article{Rahman1964,\n author = {A.~Rahman},\n title = {Correlations in the motion of atoms in liquid argon},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.},\n volume = {136},\n pages = {A405--A411},\n year = {1964},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRev.136.A405}\n}\n\n@article{TurnbullFisher1949,\n author = {D.~Turnbull and J.~C.~Fisher},\n title = {Rate of nucleation in condensed systems},\n journal = {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {17},\n pages = {71--73},\n year = {1949},\n doi = {10.1063/1.1747055}\n}\n\n@article{Wedekind2008,\n author = {J.~Wedekind and R.~Strey and D.~Reguera},\n title = {New method to analyze simulations of activated processes},\n journal = {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {126},\n pages = {134103},\n year = {2007},\n doi = {10.1063/1.2713401}\n}\n\n@article{Berthier2004,\n author = {L.~Berthier and D.~Chandler and J.~P.~Garrahan},\n title = {Length scale for the onset of {Fickian} diffusion in\n supercooled liquids},\n journal = {Europhys.\\ Lett.},\n volume = {69},\n pages = {320--326},\n year = {2005},\n doi = {10.1209/epl/i2004-10401-5}\n}\n\n@article{Fredrickson1984,\n author = {G.~H.~Fredrickson and H.~C.~Andersen},\n title = {Kinetic {Ising} model of the glass transition},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ Lett.},\n volume = {53},\n pages = {1244--1247},\n year = {1984},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1244}\n}\n\n@article{mode_coupling_L,\n author = {Janssen, L.~M.~C.},\n title = {Mode-Coupling Theory of the Glass Transition: A Primer},\n journal = {Front.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {6},\n pages = {97},\n year = {2018},\n doi = {10.3389/fphy.2018.00097}\n}\n\n@article{bib:ag2,\n author = {M{\\'{e}}zard, M. and Parisi, G.},\n title = {A first-principle computation of the thermodynamics of glasses},\n journal = {J.\\ Chem.\\ Phys.},\n volume = {111},\n pages = {1076--1095},\n year = {1999},\n doi = {10.1063/1.479796}\n}\n\n@article{ref:angelaniPEL,\n author = {Angelani, L. and Parisi, G. and Ruocco, G. and Viliani, G.},\n title = {Potential energy landscape and long-time dynamics in a simple\n model glass},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ E},\n volume = {61},\n pages = {1681--1691},\n year = {2000},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.61.1681}\n}\n\n@article{ref:parisiglasstrans,\n author = {Parisi, G.},\n title = {The physics of the glass transition},\n journal = {Physica A},\n volume = {280},\n pages = {115--124},\n year = {2000},\n doi = {10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00216-1}\n}\n\n@article{bib:KKZNT3,\n author = {Nussinov, Z.},\n title = {Avoided Phase Transitions and Glassy Dynamics in Geometrically\n Frustrated Systems and Non-{Abelian} Theories},\n journal = {Phys.\\ Rev.\\ B},\n volume = {69},\n pages = {014208},\n year = {2004},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevB.69.014208}\n}\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091186,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31986"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31986"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Lianyu Hu"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Lianyu Hu, Shengqian Qin, Zeqin Liao, Qing Guo, Liang Wan, Wei Feng, Yang Liu"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"CoLT: Teaching Multi-Modal Models to Think with Chain of Latent Thoughts"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"Accepted by ECCV2026. Code is available at https://github.com/hulianyuyy/CoLT"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.CV"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has enabled multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) to tackle complex visual reasoning tasks by generating explicit intermediate reasoning steps in natural language. However, this text-based reasoning paradigm is inherently slow at inference time with even thousands of tokens and fundamentally constrained by the expressiveness of natural language. In this paper, we propose CoLT, (Chain of Latent Thoughts), a novel framework that teaches multi-modal models to reason through a chain of latent thought representations instead of verbose text tokens, which can perform thinking with as few as 3 steps. Naively forcing the model to think with latent states easily produces meaningless semantics and makes training unstable. To effectively regulate the latent reasoning process, we introduce a lightweight external decoder that provides step-level supervision for each latent reasoning step in two complementary directions: a forward mode that decodes latent thoughts into the textual reasoning of the next step, and a backward mode that aligns decoder hidden states with the model's latent thoughts given preceding textual context. We further incorporate internal supervision that encourages coherent step-by-step latent transitions. The decoder and internal supervision are removed during inference to maintain high efficiency of latent reasoning. Extensive experiments on eight benchmarks demonstrate that CoLT not only outperforms existing latent reasoning methods such as CODI and SIM-CoT, but also surpasses latent visual reasoning approaches that rely on auxiliary images with costly annotation requirements. Compared to text CoT methods, CoLT can notably reduce the inference time by 10.1$\\times$ and text decoding time by 22.6$\\times$. Code is released at https://github.com/hulianyuyy/CoLT."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:24:40 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:24:40 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Hu","Lianyu",""],["Qin","Shengqian",""],["Liao","Zeqin",""],["Guo","Qing",""],["Wan","Liang",""],["Feng","Wei",""],["Liu","Yang",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Hu\",\n \"Lianyu\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Qin\",\n \"Shengqian\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Liao\",\n \"Zeqin\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Guo\",\n \"Qing\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Wan\",\n \"Liang\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Feng\",\n \"Wei\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Liu\",\n \"Yang\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: eccv.sty\n================================================\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n%\n% Formatting Package for ECCV Submissions\n% \n% initially created for ECCV 2024\n% by Stefan Roth\n%\n% based on previous ECCV templates:\n% updated April 2002 by Antje Endemann\n% Based on CVPR 07 and LNCS, with modifications by DAF, AZ and elle, 2008 and AA, 2010, and CC, 2011; TT, 2014; AAS, 2016; AAS, 2020; TH, 2022\n%\n% and the CVPR templates:\n% https://github.com/cvpr-org/author-kit\n%\n% No guarantee is given that the format corresponds perfectly to\n% LNCS Proceedings, but most features should be ok.\n%\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n%\n% use as\n% \\documentclass[runningheads]{llncs}\n% \\usepackage[options]{eccv}\n%\n% \"options\" include\n% * \"review\" for submitting a paper for review and\n% * \"final\" for the camera ready (default).\n% * \"mobile\" for camera ready on small-screen devices\n% * \"year=20??\" allows to specify the conference year (default current year).\n% * \"ID=12345\" allows to specify the paper ID (default `none').\n%\n% specify references as\n% \\bibliographystyle{splncs04}\n% \\bibliography{...your files...}\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1999/12/01]\n\\ProvidesPackage{eccv}[LaTeX style for ECCV]\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Suppress unwanted warnings\n\n\\RequirePackage{silence} \n\\WarningFilter{amsmath}{Unable to redefine math accent \\vec}\n\\WarningFilter{caption}{Unknown document class (or package)}\n\\RequirePackage{etoolbox}\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Basic packages \n\n\\RequirePackage[T1]{fontenc} % Required to avoid font issues\n\\RequirePackage[left,mathlines]{lineno} % Support for line numbers\n\\RequirePackage[dvipsnames]{xcolor} % Color for line numbers\n\\RequirePackage{amsmath} % Need AMS packages to bug fix \n\\RequirePackage{amssymb} % line numbers in equations\n\\RequirePackage{cite} % Sort citations\n\\RequirePackage{xspace} \n\n% Breaking lines for URLs in the bib\n\\RequirePackage[hyphens]{url}\n\\Urlmuskip=0mu plus 1mu\\relax\n\n% Color for links and line numbers\n\\definecolor{eccvblue}{rgb}{0.12,0.49,0.85}\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Use modern caption package to allow for sub-figures etc.\n% Reproduces the original LNCS style as closely as possible.\n\n\\RequirePackage[labelfont=bf,font=small,tableposition=bottom]{caption}\n\\RequirePackage[skip=3pt]{subcaption}\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Process ECCV package options\n\n% Key value options\n\\RequirePackage{kvoptions}\n\\SetupKeyvalOptions{\n family=eccv,\n prefix=eccv@\n}\n\n\\DeclareBoolOption{review}\n\\DeclareComplementaryOption{final}{review}\n\\DeclareBoolOption{mobile}\n\\DeclareStringOption[\\the\\year]{year}\n\\DeclareStringOption[none]{ID}\n\\DeclareDefaultOption{\\PackageWarning{eccv}{Unkown option `\\CurrentOption'}}\n\\ProcessKeyvalOptions*\n\n% Enable processing options also in main paper with \\eccvsetup{ key=value, ... }\n\\newcommand*{\\eccvsetup}\n {\\setkeys{eccv}%\n}\n\n% Warn if ECCV package for review version is not loaded with paper ID option\n\\ifeccv@review\n \\ifdefstring{\\eccv@ID}{none}{%\n \\PackageWarningNoLine{eccv}{Review version requires a paper ID. Please load `eccv' package with `ID=*****' option and replace `*****' with your paper ID}\n }{}\n\\fi\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Basic error handling\n\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n % Print an error if document class other than llncs is used\n \\@ifclassloaded{llncs}{}{%\n \\PackageError{eccv}{Package only meant to be used with document class `llncs'}{Change document class to `llncs'.}\n }\n % Print a warning if incorrect options for llncs are specified\n \\@ifclasswith{llncs}{runningheads}{}{%\n \\PackageWarningNoLine{eccv}{Running heads incorrectly suppressed - ECCV requires running heads. Please load document class `llncs' with `runningheads' option}\n }\n % Print a warning if hyperref is not loaded and/or if the pagebackref option is missing\n \\ifeccv@review\n \\@ifpackageloaded{hyperref}{%\n \\@ifpackagewith{hyperref}{pagebackref}{}{%\n \\PackageWarningNoLine{eccv}{Package `hyperref' is not loaded with option `pagebackref', which is strongly recommended for review version}\n }\n }{%\n \\PackageWarningNoLine{eccv}{Package `hyperref' is not loaded, but strongly recommended for review version}\n }\n \\else\n \\@ifpackageloaded{hyperref}{%\n \\@ifpackagewith{hyperref}{pagebackref}{%\n \\PackageWarningNoLine{eccv}{Package `hyperref' is loaded with option `pagebackref', which is *not* recommended for camera-ready version}{}\n }{}\n }{%\n \\PackageWarningNoLine{eccv}{Package `hyperref' is not loaded, but highly recommended for camera-ready version}\n }\n \\fi\n}\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Line number support for the review version\n\n% NUMBER with left flushed zeros \\fillzeros[<WIDTH>]<NUMBER>\n% from CVPR template\n\\newcount\\cv@tmpc@ \\newcount\\cv@tmpc\n\\def\\fillzeros[#1]#2{\\cv@tmpc@=#2\\relax\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@<0\\cv@tmpc@=-\\cv@tmpc@\\fi\n\\cv@tmpc=1 %\n\\loop\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@<10 \\else \\divide\\cv@tmpc@ by 10 \\advance\\cv@tmpc by 1 \\fi\n \\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@=10\\relax\\cv@tmpc@=11\\relax\\fi \\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@>10 \\repeat\n\\ifnum#2<0\\advance\\cv@tmpc1\\relax-\\fi\n\\loop\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc<#1\\relax0\\advance\\cv@tmpc1\\relax\\fi \\ifnum\\cv@tmpc<#1 \\repeat\n\\cv@tmpc@=#2\\relax\\ifnum\\cv@tmpc@<0\\cv@tmpc@=-\\cv@tmpc@\\fi \\relax\\the\\cv@tmpc@}%\n\n\n% colored, bold, sans serif line numbers\n\\renewcommand\\thelinenumber{\\color{eccvblue}\\normalfont\\sffamily\\scriptsize\\fillzeros[3]{\\arabic{linenumber}}\\color[rgb]{0,0,0}}\n% on both sides\n\\renewcommand\\makeLineNumber{\\hss\\thelinenumber\\ \\hspace{4.5mm} \\rlap{\\hskip\\textwidth\\ \\hspace{5mm}\\thelinenumber}}\n\n\n% Bug: An equation with $$ ... $$ isn't numbered, nor is the previous line.\n% Patch amsmath commands so that the previous line and the equation itself\n% are numbered. Bug: multiline has an extra line number.\n% https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/461186/how-to-use-lineno-with-amsmath-align\n\n%% Patch 'normal' math environments:\n\\newcommand*\\linenomathpatch[1]{%\n \\cspreto{#1}{\\linenomath}%\n \\cspreto{#1*}{\\linenomath}%\n \\csappto{end#1}{\\endlinenomath}%\n \\csappto{end#1*}{\\endlinenomath}%\n}\n%% Patch AMS math environments:\n\\newcommand*\\linenomathpatchAMS[1]{%\n \\cspreto{#1}{\\linenomathAMS}%\n \\cspreto{#1*}{\\linenomathAMS}%\n \\csappto{end#1}{\\endlinenomath}%\n \\csappto{end#1*}{\\endlinenomath}%\n}\n\n%% Definition of \\linenomathAMS depends on whether the mathlines option is provided\n\\expandafter\\ifx\\linenomath\\linenomathWithnumbers\n \\let\\linenomathAMS\\linenomathWithnumbers\n %% The following line gets rid of an extra line numbers at the bottom:\n \\patchcmd\\linenomathAMS{\\advance\\postdisplaypenalty\\linenopenalty}{}{}{}\n\\else\n \\let\\linenomathAMS\\linenomathNonumbers\n\\fi\n\n\\linenomathpatch{equation}\n\\linenomathpatchAMS{gather}\n\\linenomathpatchAMS{multline}\n\\linenomathpatchAMS{align}\n\\linenomathpatchAMS{alignat}\n\\linenomathpatchAMS{flalign}\n\n% Disable line numbering during measurement step of multline\n\\makeatletter\n\\patchcmd{\\mmeasure@}{\\measuring@true}{\n \\measuring@true\n \\ifnum-\\linenopenaltypar>\\interdisplaylinepenalty\n \\advance\\interdisplaylinepenalty-\\linenopenalty\n \\fi\n }{}{}\n\\makeatother\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Modifications to LNCS template for review version\n\n\\makeatletter\n\\ifeccv@review\n % Display line numbers\n \\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\linenumbers\n \\linenomathpatch{equation}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{gather}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{multline}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{align}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{alignat}%\n \\linenomathpatchAMS{flalign}%\n }\n\n % Crop the page for review version\n \\RequirePackage[width=122mm,left=12mm,paperwidth=146mm,height=193mm,top=12mm,paperheight=217mm]{geometry}\n\n % Replace authors, institute, and running title with review placeholders\n \\let\\maketitleold\\maketitle\n \\renewcommand{\\maketitle}{\\author{Anonymous ECCV \\eccv@year{} Submission}%\n \\titlerunning{ECCV \\eccv@year{} Submission \\#\\eccv@ID}% \n \\authorrunning{ECCV \\eccv@year{} Submission \\#\\eccv@ID}% \n \\institute{Paper ID \\#\\eccv@ID}%\n \\maketitleold}\n\\fi\n\n\\ifeccv@mobile\n % Crop the page for mobile version\n \\RequirePackage[width=122mm,left=12mm,paperwidth=146mm,height=193mm,top=12mm,paperheight=217mm]{geometry}\n\\fi\n\n% Macro for ECCV year in main text\n\\newcommand{\\ECCVyear}{\\eccv@year\\xspace}\n\\makeatother\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Support for easy cross-referencing (e.g., \\cref{eq:loss}, \\cref{sec:intro})\n% configured with \\AtEndPreamble as it needs to be called after hyperref\n\n\\AtEndPreamble{\n \\usepackage[capitalize]{cleveref}\n \\crefname{section}{Sec.}{Secs.}\n \\Crefname{section}{Section}{Sections}\n \\crefname{table}{Tab.}{Tabs.}\n \\Crefname{table}{Table}{Tables}\n}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: eccvabbrv.sty\n================================================\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n%\n% Formatting Package for ECCV Submissions\n% \n% initially created for ECCV 2024\n% by Stefan Roth\n%\n% based on previous ECCV templates:\n% updated April 2002 by Antje Endemann\n% Based on CVPR 07 and LNCS, with modifications by DAF, AZ and elle, 2008 and AA, 2010, and CC, 2011; TT, 2014; AAS, 2016; AAS, 2020; TH, 2022\n%\n% and the CVPR templates:\n% https://github.com/cvpr-org/author-kit\n%\n% No guarantee is given that the format corresponds perfectly to\n% LNCS Proceedings, but most features should be ok.\n%\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1999/12/01]\n\\ProvidesPackage{eccvabbrv}[Common abbreviations for ECCV]\n\n% Add a period to the end of an abbreviation unless there's one\n% already, then \\xspace.\n\\RequirePackage{xspace}\n\\makeatletter\n\\DeclareRobustCommand\\onedot{\\futurelet\\@let@token\\@onedot}\n\\def\\@onedot{\\ifx\\@let@token.\\else.\\null\\fi\\xspace}\n\n\\def\\eg{\\emph{e.g}\\onedot} \n\\def\\Eg{\\emph{E.g}\\onedot}\n\\def\\ie{\\emph{i.e}\\onedot} \n\\def\\Ie{\\emph{I.e}\\onedot}\n\\def\\cf{\\emph{cf}\\onedot} \n\\def\\Cf{\\emph{Cf}\\onedot}\n\\def\\etc{\\emph{etc}\\onedot} \n\\def\\vs{\\emph{vs}\\onedot}\n\\def\\wrt{w.r.t\\onedot} \n\\def\\dof{d.o.f\\onedot}\n\\def\\iid{i.i.d\\onedot} \n\\def\\wolog{w.l.o.g\\onedot}\n\\def\\etal{\\emph{et al}\\onedot}\n\\makeatother\n\n================================================\nFILE: llncs.cls\n================================================\n% LLNCS DOCUMENT CLASS -- version 2.22 (05-Sep-2022)\n% Springer Verlag LaTeX2e support for Lecture Notes in Computer Science\n%\n%%\n%% \\CharacterTable\n%% {Upper-case \\A\\B\\C\\D\\E\\F\\G\\H\\I\\J\\K\\L\\M\\N\\O\\P\\Q\\R\\S\\T\\U\\V\\W\\X\\Y\\Z\n%% Lower-case \\a\\b\\c\\d\\e\\f\\g\\h\\i\\j\\k\\l\\m\\n\\o\\p\\q\\r\\s\\t\\u\\v\\w\\x\\y\\z\n%% Digits \\0\\1\\2\\3\\4\\5\\6\\7\\8\\9\n%% Exclamation \\! Double quote \\\" Hash (number) \\#\n%% Dollar \\$ Percent \\% Ampersand \\&\n%% Acute accent \\' Left paren \\( Right paren \\)\n%% Asterisk \\* Plus \\+ Comma \\,\n%% Minus \\- Point \\. Solidus \\/\n%% Colon \\: Semicolon \\; Less than \\<\n%% Equals \\= Greater than \\> Question mark \\?\n%% Commercial at \\@ Left bracket \\[ Backslash \\\\\n%% Right bracket \\] Circumflex \\^ Underscore \\_\n%% Grave accent \\` Left brace \\{ Vertical bar \\|\n%% Right brace \\} Tilde \\~}\n%%\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1995/12/01]\n\\ProvidesClass{llncs}[2022/09/05 v2.22\n^^J LaTeX document class for Lecture Notes in Computer Science]\n% Options\n\\let\\if@envcntreset\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{envcountreset}{\\let\\if@envcntreset\\iftrue}\n\\DeclareOption{citeauthoryear}{\\let\\citeauthoryear=Y}\n\\DeclareOption{oribibl}{\\let\\oribibl=Y}\n\\let\\if@custvec\\iftrue\n\\DeclareOption{orivec}{\\let\\if@custvec\\iffalse}\n\\let\\if@envcntsame\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{envcountsame}{\\let\\if@envcntsame\\iftrue}\n\\let\\if@envcntsect\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{envcountsect}{\\let\\if@envcntsect\\iftrue}\n\\let\\if@runhead\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{runningheads}{\\let\\if@runhead\\iftrue}\n\n\\let\\if@openright\\iftrue\n\\let\\if@openbib\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{openbib}{\\let\\if@openbib\\iftrue}\n\n% languages\n\\let\\switcht@@therlang\\relax\n\\def\\ds@deutsch{\\def\\switcht@@therlang{\\switcht@deutsch}}\n\\def\\ds@francais{\\def\\switcht@@therlang{\\switcht@francais}}\n\n\\DeclareOption*{\\PassOptionsToClass{\\CurrentOption}{article}}\n\n\\ProcessOptions\n\n\\LoadClass[twoside]{article}\n\\RequirePackage{multicol} % needed for the list of participants, index\n\\RequirePackage{aliascnt}\n\n\\setlength{\\textwidth}{12.2cm}\n\\setlength{\\textheight}{19.3cm}\n\\renewcommand\\@pnumwidth{2em}\n\\renewcommand\\@tocrmarg{3.5em}\n%\n\\def\\@dottedtocline#1#2#3#4#5{%\n \\ifnum #1>\\c@tocdepth \\else\n \\vskip \\z@ \\@plus.2\\p@\n {\\leftskip #2\\relax \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg \\advance\\rightskip by 0pt plus 2cm\n \\parfillskip -\\rightskip \\pretolerance=10000\n \\parindent #2\\relax\\@afterindenttrue\n \\interlinepenalty\\@M\n \\leavevmode\n \\@tempdima #3\\relax\n \\advance\\leftskip \\@tempdima \\null\\nobreak\\hskip -\\leftskip\n {#4}\\nobreak\n \\leaders\\hbox{$\\m@th\n \\mkern \\@dotsep mu\\hbox{.}\\mkern \\@dotsep\n mu$}\\hfill\n \\nobreak\n \\hb@xt@\\@pnumwidth{\\hfil\\normalfont \\normalcolor #5}%\n \\par}%\n \\fi}\n%\n\\def\\switcht@albion{%\n\\def\\abstractname{Abstract.}\n\\def\\ackname{Acknowledgement.}\n\\def\\andname{and}\n\\def\\lastandname{\\unskip, and}\n\\def\\appendixname{Appendix}\n\\def\\chaptername{Chapter}\n\\def\\claimname{Claim}\n\\def\\conjecturename{Conjecture}\n\\def\\contentsname{Table of Contents}\n\\def\\corollaryname{Corollary}\n\\def\\definitionname{Definition}\n\\def\\examplename{Example}\n\\def\\exercisename{Exercise}\n\\def\\figurename{Fig.}\n\\def\\keywordname{{\\bf Keywords:}}\n\\def\\indexname{Index}\n\\def\\lemmaname{Lemma}\n\\def\\contriblistname{List of Contributors}\n\\def\\listfigurename{List of Figures}\n\\def\\listtablename{List of Tables}\n\\def\\mailname{{\\it Correspondence to\\/}:}\n\\def\\noteaddname{Note added in proof}\n\\def\\notename{Note}\n\\def\\partname{Part}\n\\def\\problemname{Problem}\n\\def\\proofname{Proof}\n\\def\\propertyname{Property}\n\\def\\propositionname{Proposition}\n\\def\\questionname{Question}\n\\def\\remarkname{Remark}\n\\def\\seename{see}\n\\def\\solutionname{Solution}\n\\def\\subclassname{{\\it Subject Classifications\\/}:}\n\\def\\tablename{Table}\n\\def\\theoremname{Theorem}}\n\\switcht@albion\n% Names of theorem like environments are already defined\n% but must be translated if another language is chosen\n%\n% French section\n\\def\\switcht@francais{%\\typeout{On parle francais.}%\n \\def\\abstractname{R\\'esum\\'e.}%\n \\def\\ackname{Remerciements.}%\n \\def\\andname{et}%\n \\def\\lastandname{ et}%\n \\def\\appendixname{Appendice}%\n \\def\\chaptername{Chapitre}%\n \\def\\claimname{Pr\\'etention}%\n \\def\\conjecturename{Hypoth\\`ese}%\n \\def\\contentsname{Table des mati\\`eres}%\n \\def\\corollaryname{Corollaire}%\n \\def\\definitionname{D\\'efinition}%\n \\def\\examplename{Exemple}%\n \\def\\exercisename{Exercice}%\n \\def\\figurename{Fig.}%\n \\def\\keywordname{{\\bf Mots-cl\\'e:}}%\n \\def\\indexname{Index}%\n \\def\\lemmaname{Lemme}%\n \\def\\contriblistname{Liste des contributeurs}%\n \\def\\listfigurename{Liste des figures}%\n \\def\\listtablename{Liste des tables}%\n \\def\\mailname{{\\it Correspondence to\\/}:}%\n \\def\\noteaddname{Note ajout\\'ee \\`a l'\\'epreuve}%\n \\def\\notename{Remarque}%\n \\def\\partname{Partie}%\n \\def\\problemname{Probl\\`eme}%\n \\def\\proofname{Preuve}%\n \\def\\propertyname{Caract\\'eristique}%\n%\\def\\propositionname{Proposition}%\n \\def\\questionname{Question}%\n \\def\\remarkname{Remarque}%\n \\def\\seename{voir}%\n \\def\\solutionname{Solution}%\n \\def\\subclassname{{\\it Subject Classifications\\/}:}%\n \\def\\tablename{Tableau}%\n \\def\\theoremname{Th\\'eor\\`eme}%\n}\n%\n% German section\n\\def\\switcht@deutsch{%\\typeout{Man spricht deutsch.}%\n \\def\\abstractname{Zusammenfassung.}%\n \\def\\ackname{Danksagung.}%\n \\def\\andname{und}%\n \\def\\lastandname{ und}%\n \\def\\appendixname{Anhang}%\n \\def\\chaptername{Kapitel}%\n \\def\\claimname{Behauptung}%\n \\def\\conjecturename{Hypothese}%\n \\def\\contentsname{Inhaltsverzeichnis}%\n \\def\\corollaryname{Korollar}%\n%\\def\\definitionname{Definition}%\n \\def\\examplename{Beispiel}%\n \\def\\exercisename{\\\"Ubung}%\n \\def\\figurename{Abb.}%\n \\def\\keywordname{{\\bf Schl\\\"usselw\\\"orter:}}%\n \\def\\indexname{Index}%\n%\\def\\lemmaname{Lemma}%\n \\def\\contriblistname{Mitarbeiter}%\n \\def\\listfigurename{Abbildungsverzeichnis}%\n \\def\\listtablename{Tabellenverzeichnis}%\n \\def\\mailname{{\\it Correspondence to\\/}:}%\n \\def\\noteaddname{Nachtrag}%\n \\def\\notename{Anmerkung}%\n \\def\\partname{Teil}%\n%\\def\\problemname{Problem}%\n \\def\\proofname{Beweis}%\n \\def\\propertyname{Eigenschaft}%\n%\\def\\propositionname{Proposition}%\n \\def\\questionname{Frage}%\n \\def\\remarkname{Anmerkung}%\n \\def\\seename{siehe}%\n \\def\\solutionname{L\\\"osung}%\n \\def\\subclassname{{\\it Subject Classifications\\/}:}%\n \\def\\tablename{Tabelle}%\n%\\def\\theoremname{Theorem}%\n}\n\n% Ragged bottom for the actual page\n\\def\\thisbottomragged{\\def\\@textbottom{\\vskip\\z@ plus.0001fil\n\\global\\let\\@textbottom\\relax}}\n\n\\renewcommand\\small{%\n \\@setfontsize\\small\\@ixpt{11}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 8.5\\p@ \\@plus3\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus2\\p@\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 4\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus2\\p@\n \\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\parsep 0\\p@ \\@plus1\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\topsep 8\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\itemsep0\\p@}%\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n}\n\n\\frenchspacing\n\\widowpenalty=10000\n\\clubpenalty=10000\n\n\\setlength\\oddsidemargin {63\\p@}\n\\setlength\\evensidemargin {63\\p@}\n\\setlength\\marginparwidth {90\\p@}\n\n\\setlength\\headsep {16\\p@}\n\n\\setlength\\footnotesep{7.7\\p@}\n\\setlength\\textfloatsep{8mm\\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}\n\\setlength\\intextsep {8mm\\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\n\\setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}\n\n\\newcounter {chapter}\n\\renewcommand\\thechapter {\\@arabic\\c@chapter}\n\n\\newif\\if@mainmatter \\@mainmattertrue\n\\newcommand\\frontmatter{\\cleardoublepage\n \\@mainmatterfalse\\pagenumbering{Roman}}\n\\newcommand\\mainmatter{\\cleardoublepage\n \\@mainmattertrue\\pagenumbering{arabic}}\n\\newcommand\\backmatter{\\if@openright\\cleardoublepage\\else\\clearpage\\fi\n \\@mainmatterfalse}\n\n\\renewcommand\\part{\\cleardoublepage\n \\thispagestyle{empty}%\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\onecolumn\n \\@tempswatrue\n \\else\n \\@tempswafalse\n \\fi\n \\null\\vfil\n \\secdef\\@part\\@spart}\n\n\\def\\@part[#1]#2{%\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >-2\\relax\n \\refstepcounter{part}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{part}{\\thepart\\hspace{1em}#1}%\n \\else\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{part}{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\markboth{}{}%\n {\\centering\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M\n \\normalfont\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >-2\\relax\n \\huge\\bfseries \\partname~\\thepart\n \\par\n \\vskip 20\\p@\n \\fi\n \\Huge \\bfseries #2\\par}%\n \\@endpart}\n\\def\\@spart#1{%\n {\\centering\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M\n \\normalfont\n \\Huge \\bfseries #1\\par}%\n \\@endpart}\n\\def\\@endpart{\\vfil\\newpage\n \\if@twoside\n \\null\n \\thispagestyle{empty}%\n \\newpage\n \\fi\n \\if@tempswa\n \\twocolumn\n \\fi}\n\n\\newcommand\\chapter{\\clearpage\n \\thispagestyle{empty}%\n \\global\\@topnum\\z@\n \\@afterindentfalse\n \\secdef\\@chapter\\@schapter}\n\\def\\@chapter[#1]#2{\\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\m@ne\n \\if@mainmatter\n \\refstepcounter{chapter}%\n \\typeout{\\@chapapp\\space\\thechapter.}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}%\n {\\protect\\numberline{\\thechapter}#1}%\n \\else\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\chaptermark{#1}%\n \\addtocontents{lof}{\\protect\\addvspace{10\\p@}}%\n \\addtocontents{lot}{\\protect\\addvspace{10\\p@}}%\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\@topnewpage[\\@makechapterhead{#2}]%\n \\else\n \\@makechapterhead{#2}%\n \\@afterheading\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@makechapterhead#1{%\n% \\vspace*{50\\p@}%\n {\\centering\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\m@ne\n \\if@mainmatter\n \\large\\bfseries \\@chapapp{} \\thechapter\n \\par\\nobreak\n \\vskip 20\\p@\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\interlinepenalty\\@M\n \\Large \\bfseries #1\\par\\nobreak\n \\vskip 40\\p@\n }}\n\\def\\@schapter#1{\\if@twocolumn\n \\@topnewpage[\\@makeschapterhead{#1}]%\n \\else\n \\@makeschapterhead{#1}%\n \\@afterheading\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@makeschapterhead#1{%\n% \\vspace*{50\\p@}%\n {\\centering\n \\normalfont\n \\interlinepenalty\\@M\n \\Large \\bfseries #1\\par\\nobreak\n \\vskip 40\\p@\n }}\n\n\\renewcommand\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}%\n {-18\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {12\\p@ \\@plus 4\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}%\n {\\normalfont\\large\\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\rightskip=\\z@ \\@plus 8em\\pretolerance=10000 }}\n\\renewcommand\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}%\n {-18\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {8\\p@ \\@plus 4\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\rightskip=\\z@ \\@plus 8em\\pretolerance=10000 }}\n\\renewcommand\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}%\n {-18\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {-0.5em \\@plus -0.22em \\@minus -0.1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries\\boldmath}}\n\\renewcommand\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}%\n {-12\\p@ \\@plus -4\\p@ \\@minus -4\\p@}%\n {-0.5em \\@plus -0.22em \\@minus -0.1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}\n\\renewcommand\\subparagraph[1]{\\typeout{LLNCS warning: You should not use\n \\string\\subparagraph\\space with this class}\\vskip0.5cm\nYou should not use \\verb|\\subparagraph| with this class.\\vskip0.5cm}\n\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Gamma}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"00}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Delta}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"01}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Theta}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"02}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Lambda}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"03}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Xi}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"04}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Pi}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"05}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Sigma}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"06}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Upsilon}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"07}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Phi}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"08}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Psi}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"09}\n\\DeclareMathSymbol{\\Omega}{\\mathalpha}{letters}{\"0A}\n\n\\let\\footnotesize\\small\n\n\\if@custvec\n\\DeclareRobustCommand\\vec[1]{\\mathchoice{\\mbox{\\boldmath$\\displaystyle#1$}}\n{\\mbox{\\boldmath$\\textstyle#1$}}\n{\\mbox{\\boldmath$\\scriptstyle#1$}}\n{\\mbox{\\boldmath$\\scriptscriptstyle#1$}}}\n\\fi\n\n\\def\\squareforqed{\\hbox{\\rlap{$\\sqcap$}$\\sqcup$}}\n\\def\\qed{\\ifmmode\\squareforqed\\else{\\unskip\\nobreak\\hfil\n\\penalty50\\hskip1em\\null\\nobreak\\hfil\\squareforqed\n\\parfillskip=0pt\\finalhyphendemerits=0\\endgraf}\\fi}\n\n\\def\\getsto{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\n\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\gets\\cr\\to\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\gets\n\\cr\\to\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\gets\n\\cr\\to\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n\\gets\\cr\\to\\cr}}}}}\n\\def\\lid{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n<\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip0.9pt}=\\cr}}}}}\n\\def\\gid{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip0.9pt}=\\cr}}}}}\n\\def\\grole{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\n\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-1pt}<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-1pt}<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-0.8pt}<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-0.3pt}<\\cr}}}}}\n\\def\\bbbr{{\\rm I\\!R}} %reelle Zahlen\n\\def\\bbbm{{\\rm I\\!M}}\n\\def\\bbbn{{\\rm I\\!N}} %natuerliche Zahlen\n\\def\\bbbf{{\\rm I\\!F}}\n\\def\\bbbh{{\\rm I\\!H}}\n\\def\\bbbk{{\\rm I\\!K}}\n\\def\\bbbp{{\\rm I\\!P}}\n\\def\\bbbone{{\\mathchoice {\\rm 1\\mskip-4mu l} {\\rm 1\\mskip-4mu l}\n{\\rm 1\\mskip-4.5mu l} {\\rm 1\\mskip-5mu l}}}\n\\def\\bbbc{{\\mathchoice {\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\rm C$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\textstyle\\rm C$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle\\rm C$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\rm C$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}}}\n\\def\\bbbq{{\\mathchoice {\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\rm\nQ$}\\hbox{\\raise\n0.15\\ht0\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.8\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\textstyle\\rm Q$}\\hbox{\\raise\n0.15\\ht0\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.8\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle\\rm Q$}\\hbox{\\raise\n0.15\\ht0\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.7\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\rm Q$}\\hbox{\\raise\n0.15\\ht0\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.7\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}}}\n\\def\\bbbt{{\\mathchoice {\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\rm\nT$}\\hbox{\\hbox to0pt{\\kern0.3\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\textstyle\\rm T$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.3\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle\\rm T$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.3\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\rm T$}\\hbox{\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.3\\wd0\\vrule height0.9\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}}}\n\\def\\bbbs{{\\mathchoice\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\displaystyle \\rm S$}\\hbox{\\raise0.5\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.35\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.55\\wd0\\vrule height0.5\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\textstyle \\rm S$}\\hbox{\\raise0.5\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.35\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.55\\wd0\\vrule height0.5\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle \\rm S$}\\hbox{\\raise0.5\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.35\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\raise0.05\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.5\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}\n{\\setbox0=\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\rm S$}\\hbox{\\raise0.5\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.4\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\raise0.05\\ht0\\hbox\nto0pt{\\kern0.55\\wd0\\vrule height0.45\\ht0\\hss}\\box0}}}}\n\\def\\bbbz{{\\mathchoice {\\hbox{$\\mathsf\\textstyle Z\\kern-0.4em Z$}}\n{\\hbox{$\\mathsf\\textstyle Z\\kern-0.4em Z$}}\n{\\hbox{$\\mathsf\\scriptstyle Z\\kern-0.3em Z$}}\n{\\hbox{$\\mathsf\\scriptscriptstyle Z\\kern-0.2em Z$}}}}\n\n\\let\\ts\\,\n\n\\setlength\\leftmargini {17\\p@}\n\\setlength\\leftmargin {\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginii {\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiii {\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiv {\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength \\labelsep {.5em}\n\\setlength \\labelwidth{\\leftmargini}\n\\addtolength\\labelwidth{-\\labelsep}\n\n\\def\\@listI{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\parsep 0\\p@ \\@plus1\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\topsep 8\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\itemsep0\\p@}\n\\let\\@listi\\@listI\n\\@listi\n\\def\\@listii {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 0\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus\\p@}\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 0\\p@ \\@plus\\p@\\@minus\\p@\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\partopsep \\p@ \\@plus\\z@ \\@minus\\p@}\n\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemi{\\normalfont\\bfseries --}\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemii{$\\m@th\\bullet$}\n\n\\setlength\\arraycolsep{1.4\\p@}\n\\setlength\\tabcolsep{1.4\\p@}\n\n\\def\\tableofcontents{\\chapter*{\\contentsname\\@mkboth{{\\contentsname}}%\n {{\\contentsname}}}\n \\def\\authcount##1{\\setcounter{auco}{##1}\\setcounter{@auth}{1}}\n \\def\\lastand{\\ifnum\\value{auco}=2\\relax\n \\unskip{} \\andname\\\n \\else\n \\unskip \\lastandname\\\n \\fi}%\n \\def\\and{\\stepcounter{@auth}\\relax\n \\ifnum\\value{@auth}=\\value{auco}%\n \\lastand\n \\else\n \\unskip,\n \\fi}%\n \\@starttoc{toc}\\if@restonecol\\twocolumn\\fi}\n\n\\def\\l@part#1#2{\\addpenalty{\\@secpenalty}%\n \\addvspace{2em plus\\p@}% % space above part line\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@\n \\rightskip \\z@ plus 5em\n \\hrule\\vskip5pt\n \\large % same size as for a contribution heading\n \\bfseries\\boldmath % set line in boldface\n \\leavevmode % TeX command to enter horizontal mode.\n #1\\par\n \\vskip5pt\n \\hrule\n \\vskip1pt\n \\nobreak % Never break after part entry\n \\endgroup}\n\n\\def\\@dotsep{2}\n\n\\let\\phantomsection=\\relax\n\n\\def\\hyperhrefextend{\\ifx\\hyper@anchor\\@undefined\\else\n{}\\fi}\n\n\\def\\addnumcontentsmark#1#2#3{%\n\\addtocontents{#1}{\\protect\\contentsline{#2}{\\protect\\numberline\n {\\thechapter}#3}{\\thepage}\\hyperhrefextend}}%\n\\def\\addcontentsmark#1#2#3{%\n\\addtocontents{#1}{\\protect\\contentsline{#2}{#3}{\\thepage}\\hyperhrefextend}}%\n\\def\\addcontentsmarkwop#1#2#3{%\n\\addtocontents{#1}{\\protect\\contentsline{#2}{#3}{0}\\hyperhrefextend}}%\n\n\\def\\@adcmk[#1]{\\ifcase #1 \\or\n\\def\\@gtempa{\\addnumcontentsmark}%\n \\or \\def\\@gtempa{\\addcontentsmark}%\n \\or \\def\\@gtempa{\\addcontentsmarkwop}%\n \\fi\\@gtempa{toc}{chapter}%\n}\n\\def\\addtocmark{%\n\\phantomsection\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@adcmk}{\\@adcmk[3]}%\n}\n\n\\def\\l@chapter#1#2{\\addpenalty{-\\@highpenalty}\n \\vskip 1.0em plus 1pt \\@tempdima 1.5em \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@ \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg\n \\advance\\rightskip by 0pt plus 2cm\n \\parfillskip -\\rightskip \\pretolerance=10000\n \\leavevmode \\advance\\leftskip\\@tempdima \\hskip -\\leftskip\n {\\large\\bfseries\\boldmath#1}\\ifx0#2\\hfil\\null\n \\else\n \\nobreak\n \\leaders\\hbox{$\\m@th \\mkern \\@dotsep mu.\\mkern\n \\@dotsep mu$}\\hfill\n \\nobreak\\hbox to\\@pnumwidth{\\hss #2}%\n \\fi\\par\n \\penalty\\@highpenalty \\endgroup}\n\n\\def\\l@title#1#2{\\addpenalty{-\\@highpenalty}\n \\addvspace{8pt plus 1pt}\n \\@tempdima \\z@\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@ \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg\n \\advance\\rightskip by 0pt plus 2cm\n \\parfillskip -\\rightskip \\pretolerance=10000\n \\leavevmode \\advance\\leftskip\\@tempdima \\hskip -\\leftskip\n #1\\nobreak\n \\leaders\\hbox{$\\m@th \\mkern \\@dotsep mu.\\mkern\n \\@dotsep mu$}\\hfill\n \\nobreak\\hbox to\\@pnumwidth{\\hss #2}\\par\n \\penalty\\@highpenalty \\endgroup}\n\n\\def\\l@author#1#2{\\addpenalty{\\@highpenalty}\n \\@tempdima=15\\p@ %\\z@\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@ \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg\n \\advance\\rightskip by 0pt plus 2cm\n \\pretolerance=10000\n \\leavevmode \\advance\\leftskip\\@tempdima %\\hskip -\\leftskip\n \\textit{#1}\\par\n \\penalty\\@highpenalty \\endgroup}\n\n\\setcounter{tocdepth}{0}\n\\newdimen\\tocchpnum\n\\newdimen\\tocsecnum\n\\newdimen\\tocsectotal\n\\newdimen\\tocsubsecnum\n\\newdimen\\tocsubsectotal\n\\newdimen\\tocsubsubsecnum\n\\newdimen\\tocsubsubsectotal\n\\newdimen\\tocparanum\n\\newdimen\\tocparatotal\n\\newdimen\\tocsubparanum\n\\tocchpnum=\\z@ % no chapter numbers\n\\tocsecnum=15\\p@ % section 88. plus 2.222pt\n\\tocsubsecnum=23\\p@ % subsection 88.8 plus 2.222pt\n\\tocsubsubsecnum=27\\p@ % subsubsection 88.8.8 plus 1.444pt\n\\tocparanum=35\\p@ % paragraph 88.8.8.8 plus 1.666pt\n\\tocsubparanum=43\\p@ % subparagraph 88.8.8.8.8 plus 1.888pt\n\\def\\calctocindent{%\n\\tocsectotal=\\tocchpnum\n\\advance\\tocsectotal by\\tocsecnum\n\\tocsubsectotal=\\tocsectotal\n\\advance\\tocsubsectotal by\\tocsubsecnum\n\\tocsubsubsectotal=\\tocsubsectotal\n\\advance\\tocsubsubsectotal by\\tocsubsubsecnum\n\\tocparatotal=\\tocsubsubsectotal\n\\advance\\tocparatotal by\\tocparanum}\n\\calctocindent\n\n\\def\\l@section{\\@dottedtocline{1}{\\tocchpnum}{\\tocsecnum}}\n\\def\\l@subsection{\\@dottedtocline{2}{\\tocsectotal}{\\tocsubsecnum}}\n\\def\\l@subsubsection{\\@dottedtocline{3}{\\tocsubsectotal}{\\tocsubsubsecnum}}\n\\def\\l@paragraph{\\@dottedtocline{4}{\\tocsubsubsectotal}{\\tocparanum}}\n\\def\\l@subparagraph{\\@dottedtocline{5}{\\tocparatotal}{\\tocsubparanum}}\n\n\\def\\listoffigures{\\@restonecolfalse\\if@twocolumn\\@restonecoltrue\\onecolumn\n \\fi\\section*{\\listfigurename\\@mkboth{{\\listfigurename}}{{\\listfigurename}}}\n \\@starttoc{lof}\\if@restonecol\\twocolumn\\fi}\n\\def\\l@figure{\\@dottedtocline{1}{0em}{1.5em}}\n\n\\def\\listoftables{\\@restonecolfalse\\if@twocolumn\\@restonecoltrue\\onecolumn\n \\fi\\section*{\\listtablename\\@mkboth{{\\listtablename}}{{\\listtablename}}}\n \\@starttoc{lot}\\if@restonecol\\twocolumn\\fi}\n\\let\\l@table\\l@figure\n\n\\renewcommand\\listoffigures{%\n \\section*{\\listfigurename\n \\@mkboth{\\listfigurename}{\\listfigurename}}%\n \\@starttoc{lof}%\n }\n\n\\renewcommand\\listoftables{%\n \\section*{\\listtablename\n \\@mkboth{\\listtablename}{\\listtablename}}%\n \\@starttoc{lot}%\n }\n\n\\ifx\\oribibl\\undefined\n\\ifx\\citeauthoryear\\undefined\n\\renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]\n {\\section*{\\refname}\n \\def\\@biblabel##1{##1.}\n \\small\n \\list{\\@biblabel{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n {\\settowidth\\labelwidth{\\@biblabel{#1}}%\n \\leftmargin\\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\labelsep\n \\if@openbib\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\bibindent\n \\itemindent -\\bibindent\n \\listparindent \\itemindent\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\fi\n \\usecounter{enumiv}%\n \\let\\p@enumiv\\@empty\n \\renewcommand\\theenumiv{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n \\if@openbib\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\par}%\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\hskip .11em \\@plus.33em \\@minus.07em}%\n \\fi\n \\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000%\n \\sfcode`\\.=\\@m}\n {\\def\\@noitemerr\n {\\@latex@warning{Empty `thebibliography' environment}}%\n \\endlist}\n\\def\\@lbibitem[#1]#2{\\item[{[#1]}\\hfill]\\if@filesw\n {\\let\\protect\\noexpand\\immediate\n \\write\\@auxout{\\string\\bibcite{#2}{#1}}}\\fi\\ignorespaces}\n\\newcount\\@tempcntc\n\\def\\@citex[#1]#2{\\if@filesw\\immediate\\write\\@auxout{\\string\\citation{#2}}\\fi\n \\@tempcnta\\z@\\@tempcntb\\m@ne\\def\\@citea{}\\@cite{\\@for\\@citeb:=#2\\do\n {\\@ifundefined\n {b@\\@citeb}{\\@citeo\\@tempcntb\\m@ne\\@citea\\def\\@citea{,}{\\bfseries\n ?}\\@warning\n {Citation `\\@citeb' on page \\thepage \\space undefined}}%\n {\\setbox\\z@\\hbox{\\global\\@tempcntc0\\csname b@\\@citeb\\endcsname\\relax}%\n \\ifnum\\@tempcntc=\\z@ \\@citeo\\@tempcntb\\m@ne\n \\@citea\\def\\@citea{,}\\hbox{\\csname b@\\@citeb\\endcsname}%\n \\else\n \\advance\\@tempcntb\\@ne\n \\ifnum\\@tempcntb=\\@tempcntc\n \\else\\advance\\@tempcntb\\m@ne\\@citeo\n \\@tempcnta\\@tempcntc\\@tempcntb\\@tempcntc\\fi\\fi}}\\@citeo}{#1}}\n\\def\\@citeo{\\ifnum\\@tempcnta>\\@tempcntb\\else\n \\@citea\\def\\@citea{,\\,\\hskip\\z@skip}%\n \\ifnum\\@tempcnta=\\@tempcntb\\the\\@tempcnta\\else\n {\\advance\\@tempcnta\\@ne\\ifnum\\@tempcnta=\\@tempcntb \\else\n \\def\\@citea{--}\\fi\n \\advance\\@tempcnta\\m@ne\\the\\@tempcnta\\@citea\\the\\@tempcntb}\\fi\\fi}\n\\else\n\\renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]\n {\\section*{\\refname}\n \\small\n \\list{}%\n {\\settowidth\\labelwidth{}%\n \\leftmargin\\parindent\n \\itemindent=-\\parindent\n \\labelsep=\\z@\n \\if@openbib\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\bibindent\n \\itemindent -\\bibindent\n \\listparindent \\itemindent\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\fi\n \\usecounter{enumiv}%\n \\let\\p@enumiv\\@empty\n \\renewcommand\\theenumiv{}}%\n \\if@openbib\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\par}%\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\hskip .11em \\@plus.33em \\@minus.07em}%\n \\fi\n \\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000%\n \\sfcode`\\.=\\@m}\n {\\def\\@noitemerr\n {\\@latex@warning{Empty `thebibliography' environment}}%\n \\endlist}\n \\def\\@cite#1{#1}%\n \\def\\@lbibitem[#1]#2{\\item[]\\if@filesw\n {\\def\\protect##1{\\string ##1\\space}\\immediate\n \\write\\@auxout{\\string\\bibcite{#2}{#1}}}\\fi\\ignorespaces}\n \\fi\n\\else\n\\@cons\\@openbib@code{\\noexpand\\small}\n\\fi\n\n\\def\\idxquad{\\hskip 10\\p@}% space that divides entry from number\n\n\\def\\@idxitem{\\par\\hangindent 10\\p@}\n\n\\def\\subitem{\\par\\setbox0=\\hbox{--\\enspace}% second order\n \\noindent\\hangindent\\wd0\\box0}% index entry\n\n\\def\\subsubitem{\\par\\setbox0=\\hbox{--\\,--\\enspace}% third\n \\noindent\\hangindent\\wd0\\box0}% order index entry\n\n\\def\\indexspace{\\par \\vskip 10\\p@ plus5\\p@ minus3\\p@\\relax}\n\n\\renewenvironment{theindex}\n {\\@mkboth{\\indexname}{\\indexname}%\n \\thispagestyle{empty}\\parindent\\z@\n \\parskip\\z@ \\@plus .3\\p@\\relax\n \\let\\item\\par\n \\def\\,{\\relax\\ifmmode\\mskip\\thinmuskip\n \\else\\hskip0.2em\\ignorespaces\\fi}%\n \\normalfont\\small\n \\begin{multicols}{2}[\\@makeschapterhead{\\indexname}]%\n }\n {\\end{multicols}}\n\n\\renewcommand\\footnoterule{%\n \\kern-3\\p@\n \\hrule\\@width 2truecm\n \\kern2.6\\p@}\n \\newdimen\\fnindent\n \\fnindent1em\n\\long\\def\\@makefntext#1{%\n \\parindent \\fnindent%\n \\leftskip \\fnindent%\n \\noindent\n \\llap{\\hb@xt@1em{\\hss\\@makefnmark\\ }}\\ignorespaces#1}\n\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{%\n \\small\n \\vskip\\abovecaptionskip\n \\sbox\\@tempboxa{{\\bfseries #1.} #2}%\n \\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize\n {\\bfseries #1.} #2\\par\n \\else\n \\global \\@minipagefalse\n \\hb@xt@\\hsize{\\hfil\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n \\fi\n \\vskip\\belowcaptionskip}\n\n\\def\\fps@figure{htbp}\n\\def\\fnum@figure{\\figurename\\thinspace\\thefigure}\n\\def \\@floatboxreset {%\n \\reset@font\n \\small\n \\@setnobreak\n \\@setminipage\n}\n\\def\\fps@table{htbp}\n\\def\\fnum@table{\\tablename~\\thetable}\n\\renewenvironment{table}\n {\\setlength\\abovecaptionskip{0\\p@}%\n \\setlength\\belowcaptionskip{10\\p@}%\n \\@float{table}}\n {\\end@float}\n\\renewenvironment{table*}\n {\\setlength\\abovecaptionskip{0\\p@}%\n \\setlength\\belowcaptionskip{10\\p@}%\n \\@dblfloat{table}}\n {\\end@dblfloat}\n\n\\long\\def\\@caption#1[#2]#3{\\par\\addcontentsline{\\csname\n ext@#1\\endcsname}{#1}{\\protect\\numberline{\\csname\n the#1\\endcsname}{\\ignorespaces #2}}\\begingroup\n \\@parboxrestore\n \\@makecaption{\\csname fnum@#1\\endcsname}{\\ignorespaces #3}\\par\n \\endgroup}\n\n% LaTeX does not provide a command to enter the authors institute\n% addresses. The \\institute command is defined here.\n\n\\newcounter{@inst}\n\\newcounter{@auth}\n\\newcounter{auco}\n\\newdimen\\instindent\n\\newbox\\authrun\n\\newtoks\\authorrunning\n\\newtoks\\tocauthor\n\\newbox\\titrun\n\\newtoks\\titlerunning\n\\newtoks\\toctitle\n\n\\def\\clearheadinfo{\\gdef\\@author{No Author Given}%\n \\gdef\\@title{No Title Given}%\n \\gdef\\@subtitle{}%\n \\gdef\\@institute{No Institute Given}%\n \\gdef\\@thanks{}%\n \\global\\titlerunning={}\\global\\authorrunning={}%\n \\global\\toctitle={}\\global\\tocauthor={}}\n\n\\def\\institute#1{\\gdef\\@institute{#1}}\n\n\\def\\institutename{\\par\n \\begingroup\n \\parskip=\\z@\n \\parindent=\\z@\n \\setcounter{@inst}{1}%\n \\def\\and{\\par\\stepcounter{@inst}%\n \\noindent$^{\\the@inst}$\\enspace\\ignorespaces}%\n \\setbox0=\\vbox{\\def\\thanks##1{}\\@institute}%\n \\ifnum\\c@@inst=1\\relax\n \\gdef\\fnnstart{0}%\n \\else\n \\xdef\\fnnstart{\\c@@inst}%\n \\setcounter{@inst}{1}%\n \\noindent$^{\\the@inst}$\\enspace\n \\fi\n \\ignorespaces\n \\@institute\\par\n \\endgroup}\n\n\\def\\@fnsymbol#1{\\ensuremath{\\ifcase#1\\or\\star\\or{\\star\\star}\\or\n {\\star\\star\\star}\\or \\dagger\\or \\ddagger\\or\n \\mathchar \"278\\or \\mathchar \"27B\\or \\|\\or **\\or \\dagger\\dagger\n \\or \\ddagger\\ddagger \\else\\@ctrerr\\fi}}\n\n\\def\\inst#1{\\unskip$^{#1}$}\n\\def\\orcidID#1{\\unskip$^{[#1]}$} % added MR 2018-03-10\n\\def\\fnmsep{\\unskip$^,$}\n\\def\\email#1{{\\tt#1}}\n\n\\AtBeginDocument{\\@ifundefined{url}{\\def\\url#1{#1}}{}%\n\\@ifpackageloaded{babel}{%\n\\@ifundefined{extrasenglish}{}{\\addto\\extrasenglish{\\switcht@albion}}%\n\\@ifundefined{extrasfrenchb}{}{\\addto\\extrasfrenchb{\\switcht@francais}}%\n\\@ifundefined{extrasgerman}{}{\\addto\\extrasgerman{\\switcht@deutsch}}%\n\\@ifundefined{extrasngerman}{}{\\addto\\extrasngerman{\\switcht@deutsch}}%\n}{\\switcht@@therlang}%\n\\providecommand{\\keywords}[1]{\\def\\and{{\\textperiodcentered} }%\n\\par\\addvspace\\baselineskip\n\\noindent\\keywordname\\enspace\\ignorespaces#1}%\n\\@ifpackageloaded{hyperref}{%\n\\def\\doi#1{\\href{https://doi.org/\\detokenize{#1}}{\\url{https://doi.org/#1}}}}{\n\\def\\doi#1{https://doi.org/\\detokenize{#1}}}\n}\n\\def\\homedir{\\~{ }}\n\n\\def\\subtitle#1{\\gdef\\@subtitle{#1}}\n\\clearheadinfo\n%\n%%% to avoid hyperref warnings\n\\providecommand*{\\toclevel@author}{999}\n%%% to make title-entry parent of section-entries\n\\providecommand*{\\toclevel@title}{0}\n%\n\\renewcommand\\maketitle{\\newpage\n\\phantomsection\n \\refstepcounter{chapter}%\n \\stepcounter{section}%\n \\setcounter{section}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{figure}{0}\n \\setcounter{table}{0}\n \\setcounter{equation}{0}\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}%\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent=\\z@\n \\renewcommand\\thefootnote{\\@fnsymbol\\c@footnote}%\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\ifnum \\col@number=\\@ne\n \\@maketitle\n \\else\n \\twocolumn[\\@maketitle]%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\newpage\n \\global\\@topnum\\z@ % Prevents figures from going at top of page.\n \\@maketitle\n \\fi\n \\thispagestyle{empty}\\@thanks\n%\n \\def\\\\{\\unskip\\ \\ignorespaces}\\def\\inst##1{\\unskip{}}%\n \\def\\thanks##1{\\unskip{}}\\def\\fnmsep{\\unskip}%\n \\instindent=\\hsize\n \\advance\\instindent by-\\headlineindent\n \\if!\\the\\toctitle!\\addcontentsline{toc}{title}{\\@title}\\else\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{title}{\\the\\toctitle}\\fi\n \\if@runhead\n \\if!\\the\\titlerunning!\\else\n \\edef\\@title{\\the\\titlerunning}%\n \\fi\n \\global\\setbox\\titrun=\\hbox{\\small\\rm\\unboldmath\\ignorespaces\\@title}%\n \\ifdim\\wd\\titrun>\\instindent\n \\typeout{Title too long for running head. Please supply}%\n \\typeout{a shorter form with \\string\\titlerunning\\space prior to\n \\string\\maketitle}%\n \\global\\setbox\\titrun=\\hbox{\\small\\rm\n Title Suppressed Due to Excessive Length}%\n \\fi\n \\xdef\\@title{\\copy\\titrun}%\n \\fi\n%\n \\if!\\the\\tocauthor!\\relax\n {\\def\\and{\\noexpand\\protect\\noexpand\\and}%\n \\def\\inst##1{}% added MR 2017-09-20 to remove inst numbers from the TOC\n \\def\\orcidID##1{}% added MR 2017-09-20 to remove ORCID ids from the TOC\n \\protected@xdef\\toc@uthor{\\@author}}%\n \\else\n \\def\\\\{\\noexpand\\protect\\noexpand\\newline}%\n \\protected@xdef\\scratch{\\the\\tocauthor}%\n \\protected@xdef\\toc@uthor{\\scratch}%\n \\fi\n \\addtocontents{toc}{\\noexpand\\protect\\noexpand\\authcount{\\the\\c@auco}}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{author}{\\toc@uthor}%\n \\if@runhead\n \\if!\\the\\authorrunning!\n \\value{@inst}=\\value{@auth}%\n \\setcounter{@auth}{1}%\n \\else\n \\edef\\@author{\\the\\authorrunning}%\n \\fi\n \\global\\setbox\\authrun=\\hbox{\\def\\inst##1{}% added MR 2017-09-20 to remove inst numbers from the runninghead\n \\def\\orcidID##1{}% added MR 2017-09-20 to remove ORCID ids from the runninghead\n \\small\\unboldmath\\@author\\unskip}%\n \\ifdim\\wd\\authrun>\\instindent\n \\typeout{Names of authors too long for running head. Please supply}%\n \\typeout{a shorter form with \\string\\authorrunning\\space prior to\n \\string\\maketitle}%\n \\global\\setbox\\authrun=\\hbox{\\small\\rm\n Authors Suppressed Due to Excessive Length}%\n \\fi\n \\xdef\\@author{\\copy\\authrun}%\n \\markboth{\\@author}{\\@title}%\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\setcounter{footnote}{\\fnnstart}%\n \\clearheadinfo}\n%\n\\def\\@maketitle{\\newpage\n \\markboth{}{}%\n \\def\\lastand{\\ifnum\\value{@inst}=2\\relax\n \\unskip{} \\andname\\\n \\else\n \\unskip \\lastandname\\\n \\fi}%\n \\def\\and{\\stepcounter{@auth}\\relax\n \\ifnum\\value{@auth}=\\value{@inst}%\n \\lastand\n \\else\n \\unskip,\n \\fi}%\n \\begin{center}%\n \\let\\newline\\\\\n {\\Large \\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\pretolerance=10000\n \\@title \\par}\\vskip .8cm\n\\if!\\@subtitle!\\else {\\large \\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\vskip -.65cm\n \\pretolerance=10000\n \\@subtitle \\par}\\vskip .8cm\\fi\n \\setbox0=\\vbox{\\setcounter{@auth}{1}\\def\\and{\\stepcounter{@auth}}%\n \\def\\thanks##1{}\\@author}%\n \\global\\value{@inst}=\\value{@auth}%\n \\global\\value{auco}=\\value{@auth}%\n \\setcounter{@auth}{1}%\n{\\lineskip .5em\n\\noindent\\ignorespaces\n\\@author\\vskip.35cm}\n {\\small\\institutename}\n \\end{center}%\n }\n\n% definition of the \"\\spnewtheorem\" command.\n%\n% Usage:\n%\n% \\spnewtheorem{env_nam}{caption}[within]{cap_font}{body_font}\n% or \\spnewtheorem{env_nam}[numbered_like]{caption}{cap_font}{body_font}\n% or \\spnewtheorem*{env_nam}{caption}{cap_font}{body_font}\n%\n% New is \"cap_font\" and \"body_font\". It stands for\n% fontdefinition of the caption and the text itself.\n%\n% \"\\spnewtheorem*\" gives a theorem without number.\n%\n% A defined spnewthoerem environment is used as described\n% by Lamport.\n%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\def\\@thmcountersep{}\n\\def\\@thmcounterend{.}\n\n\\def\\spnewtheorem{\\@ifstar{\\@sthm}{\\@Sthm}}\n\n% definition of \\spnewtheorem with number\n\n\\def\\@spnthm#1#2{%\n \\@ifnextchar[{\\@spxnthm{#1}{#2}}{\\@spynthm{#1}{#2}}}\n\\def\\@Sthm#1{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@spothm{#1}}{\\@spnthm{#1}}}\n\n\\def\\@spxnthm#1#2[#3]#4#5{\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\@definecounter{#1}\\@addtoreset{#1}{#3}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname the#1\\endcsname{\\expandafter\\noexpand\n \\csname the#3\\endcsname \\noexpand\\@thmcountersep \\@thmcounter{#1}}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname #1name\\endcsname{#2}%\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@spthm{#1}{\\csname #1name\\endcsname}{#4}{#5}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}\n\n\\def\\@spynthm#1#2#3#4{\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\@definecounter{#1}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname the#1\\endcsname{\\@thmcounter{#1}}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname #1name\\endcsname{#2}%\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@spthm{#1}{\\csname #1name\\endcsname}{#3}{#4}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}\n\n\\def\\@spothm#1[#2]#3#4#5{%\n \\@ifundefined{c@#2}{\\@latexerr{No theorem environment `#2' defined}\\@eha}%\n {\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\newaliascnt{#1}{#2}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname #1name\\endcsname{#3}%\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@spthm{#1}{\\csname #1name\\endcsname}{#4}{#5}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}}\n\n\\def\\@spthm#1#2#3#4{\\topsep 7\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n\\refstepcounter{#1}%\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@spythm{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}}{\\@spxthm{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}}}\n\n\\def\\@spxthm#1#2#3#4{\\@spbegintheorem{#2}{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}{#3}{#4}%\n \\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\@spythm#1#2#3#4[#5]{\\@spopargbegintheorem{#2}{\\csname\n the#1\\endcsname}{#5}{#3}{#4}\\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\@spbegintheorem#1#2#3#4{\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{#3#1\\ #2\\@thmcounterend}]#4}\n\n\\def\\@spopargbegintheorem#1#2#3#4#5{\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{#4#1\\ #2}]{#4(#3)\\@thmcounterend\\ }#5}\n\n% definition of \\spnewtheorem* without number\n\n\\def\\@sthm#1#2{\\@Ynthm{#1}{#2}}\n\n\\def\\@Ynthm#1#2#3#4{\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@Thm{\\csname #1name\\endcsname}{#3}{#4}}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname #1name\\endcsname{#2}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endtheorem}}}\n\n\\def\\@Thm#1#2#3{\\topsep 7\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n\\@ifnextchar[{\\@Ythm{#1}{#2}{#3}}{\\@Xthm{#1}{#2}{#3}}}\n\n\\def\\@Xthm#1#2#3{\\@Begintheorem{#1}{#2}{#3}\\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\@Ythm#1#2#3[#4]{\\@Opargbegintheorem{#1}\n {#4}{#2}{#3}\\ignorespaces}\n\n\\def\\@Begintheorem#1#2#3{#3\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{#2#1\\@thmcounterend}]}\n\n\\def\\@Opargbegintheorem#1#2#3#4{#4\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{#3#1}]{#3(#2)\\@thmcounterend\\ }}\n\n\\if@envcntsect\n \\def\\@thmcountersep{.}\n \\spnewtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\else\n \\spnewtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n \\if@envcntreset\n \\@addtoreset{theorem}{section}\n \\else\n \\@addtoreset{theorem}{chapter}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n%definition of divers theorem environments\n\\spnewtheorem*{claim}{Claim}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spnewtheorem*{proof}{Proof}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\if@envcntsame % alle Umgebungen wie Theorem.\n \\def\\spn@wtheorem#1#2#3#4{\\@spothm{#1}[theorem]{#2}{#3}{#4}}\n\\else % alle Umgebungen mit eigenem Zaehler\n \\if@envcntsect % mit section numeriert\n \\def\\spn@wtheorem#1#2#3#4{\\@spxnthm{#1}{#2}[section]{#3}{#4}}\n \\else % nicht mit section numeriert\n \\if@envcntreset\n \\def\\spn@wtheorem#1#2#3#4{\\@spynthm{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}\n \\@addtoreset{#1}{section}}\n \\else\n \\def\\spn@wtheorem#1#2#3#4{\\@spynthm{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}\n \\@addtoreset{#1}{chapter}}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\\spn@wtheorem{case}{Case}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{conjecture}{Conjecture}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{corollary}{Corollary}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\spn@wtheorem{definition}{Definition}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\spn@wtheorem{example}{Example}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{exercise}{Exercise}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\spn@wtheorem{note}{Note}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{problem}{Problem}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{property}{Property}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{proposition}{Proposition}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\spn@wtheorem{question}{Question}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{solution}{Solution}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\spn@wtheorem{remark}{Remark}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\n\\def\\@takefromreset#1#2{%\n \\def\\@tempa{#1}%\n \\let\\@tempd\\@elt\n \\def\\@elt##1{%\n \\def\\@tempb{##1}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@tempb\\else\n \\@addtoreset{##1}{#2}%\n \\fi}%\n \\expandafter\\expandafter\\let\\expandafter\\@tempc\\csname cl@#2\\endcsname\n \\expandafter\\def\\csname cl@#2\\endcsname{}%\n \\@tempc\n \\let\\@elt\\@tempd}\n\n\\def\\theopargself{\\def\\@spopargbegintheorem##1##2##3##4##5{\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{##4##1\\ ##2}]{##4##3\\@thmcounterend\\ }##5}\n \\def\\@Opargbegintheorem##1##2##3##4{##4\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{##3##1}]{##3##2\\@thmcounterend\\ }}\n }\n\n\\renewenvironment{abstract}{%\n \\list{}{\\advance\\topsep by0.35cm\\relax\\small\n \\leftmargin=1cm\n \\labelwidth=\\z@\n \\listparindent=\\z@\n \\itemindent\\listparindent\n \\rightmargin\\leftmargin}\\item[\\hskip\\labelsep\n \\bfseries\\abstractname]}\n {\\endlist}\n\n\\newdimen\\headlineindent % dimension for space between\n\\headlineindent=1.166cm % number and text of headings.\n\n\\def\\ps@headings{\\let\\@mkboth\\@gobbletwo\n \\let\\@oddfoot\\@empty\\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n \\def\\@evenhead{\\normalfont\\small\\rlap{\\thepage}\\hspace{\\headlineindent}%\n \\leftmark\\hfil}\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\normalfont\\small\\hfil\\rightmark\\hspace{\\headlineindent}%\n \\llap{\\thepage}}\n \\def\\chaptermark##1{}%\n \\def\\sectionmark##1{}%\n \\def\\subsectionmark##1{}}\n\n\\def\\ps@titlepage{\\let\\@mkboth\\@gobbletwo\n \\let\\@oddfoot\\@empty\\let\\@evenfoot\\@empty\n \\def\\@evenhead{\\normalfont\\small\\rlap{\\thepage}\\hspace{\\headlineindent}%\n \\hfil}\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\normalfont\\small\\hfil\\hspace{\\headlineindent}%\n \\llap{\\thepage}}\n \\def\\chaptermark##1{}%\n \\def\\sectionmark##1{}%\n \\def\\subsectionmark##1{}}\n\n\\if@runhead\\ps@headings\\else\n\\ps@empty\\fi\n\n\\setlength\\arraycolsep{1.4\\p@}\n\\setlength\\tabcolsep{1.4\\p@}\n\n\\endinput\n%end of file llncs.cls\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.bib\n================================================\n% Long form of conference & journal abbreviations -- especially for camera ready\n@String(PAMI = {IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.})\n@String(IJCV = {Int. J. Comput. Vis.})\n@String(CVPR = {IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog.})\n@String(ICCV = {Int. Conf. Comput. Vis.})\n@String(ECCV = {Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis.})\n@String(NeurIPS = {Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst.})\n@String(ICML = {Int. Conf. Mach. Learn.})\n@String(ICLR = {Int. Conf. Learn. Represent.})\n@String(ACCV = {Asian Conf. Comput. Vis.})\n@String(BMVC = {Brit. Mach. Vis. Conf.})\n@String(CVPRW = {IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog. Worksh.})\n@String(AAAI = {AAAI})\n@String(IJCAI = {IJCAI})\n@String(ICIP = {IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process.})\n@String(ICPR = {Int. Conf. Pattern Recog.})\n@String(ICASSP=\t{ICASSP})\n@String(ICME = {Int. Conf. Multimedia and Expo})\n@String(JMLR = {J. Mach. Learn. Res.})\n@String(TMLR = {Trans. Mach. Learn Res.})\n@String(TOG = {ACM Trans. Graph.})\n@String(TIP = {IEEE Trans. Image Process.})\n@String(TVCG = {IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.})\n@String(TCSVT = {IEEE Trans. Circuit Syst. Video Technol.})\n@String(TMM = {IEEE Trans. Multimedia})\n@String(ACMMM = {ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia})\n@String(PR = {Pattern Recognition})\n\n@String(MNI\t = {Nature Mach. Intell.})\n@String(SPL\t = {IEEE Sign. Process. Letters})\n@String(VR = {Vis. Res.})\n@String(JOV\t = {J. Vis.})\n@String(TVC = {The Vis. Comput.})\n@String(JCST = {J. Comput. Sci. Tech.})\n@String(CGF = {Comput. Graph. Forum})\n@String(CVM = {Computational Visual Media})\n\n\n% Short form of conference & journal abbreviations -- especially for submission version\n% if desired, remove these macros in favor of the above ones\n@String(PAMI = {IEEE TPAMI})\n@String(IJCV = {IJCV})\n@String(CVPR = {CVPR})\n@String(ICCV = {ICCV})\n@String(ECCV = {ECCV})\n@String(NeurIPS = {NeurIPS})\n@String(ICML = {ICML})\n@String(ICLR = {ICLR})\n@String(ACCV = {ACCV})\n@String(BMVC =\t{BMVC})\n@String(CVPRW = {CVPRW})\n@String(AAAI = {AAAI})\n@String(IJCAI = {IJCAI})\n@String(ICIP = {ICIP})\n@String(ICPR = {ICPR})\n@String(ICASSP=\t{ICASSP})\n@String(ICME =\t{ICME})\n@String(JMLR = {JMLR})\n@String(TMLR = {TMLR})\n@String(TOG = {ACM TOG})\n@String(TIP = {IEEE TIP})\n@String(TVCG = {IEEE TVCG})\n@String(TCSVT = {IEEE TCSVT})\n@String(TMM =\t{IEEE TMM})\n@String(ACMMM = {ACM MM})\n@String(PR = {PR})\n\n@article{fu2026neurosymactive,\n title={Neurosymactive: Differentiable neural-symbolic reasoning with active exploration for knowledge graph question answering},\n author={Fu, Rong and Li, Yang and Zhang, Zeyu and Wu, Jiekai and Liu, Yaohua and Cao, Shuaishuai and Zeng, Yangchen and Zhang, Yuhang and Du, Xiaojing and Fong, Simon},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15353},\n year={2026}\n}\n@inproceedings{fu2026s,\n title={S-Path-RAG: Semantic-Aware Shortest-Path Retrieval Augmented Generation for Multi-Hop Knowledge Graph Question Answering},\n author={Fu, Rong and Wang, Yemin and Xu, Tianxiang and Liu, Yongtai and Tang, Weizhi and Wu, Wangyu and Ma, Xiaowen and Fong, Simon},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2026},\n pages={4057--4068},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{bai2026prism,\n title={Prism: Efficient Test-Time Scaling via Hierarchical Search and Self-Verification for Discrete Diffusion Language Models},\n author={Bai, Jinbin and Li, Yixuan and Zhu, Yuchen and Xin, Yi and Shi, Qingyu and Feng, Aosong and Liu, Xiaohong and Tao, Molei and Xue, Jianru and Li, Xiangtai and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.01842},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{bai2026tgo,\n title={Threshold-Guided Optimization for Visual Generative Models},\n author={Bai, Jinbin and Lei, Yu and Shi, Qingyu and Feng, Aosong and Xin, Yi and Zhao, Zhuoran and Shen, Fei and Yu, Kaidong and Li, Jason},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.04653},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@misc{zhu2026medsynapsevbridgingvisualperception,\n title={MedSynapse-V: Bridging Visual Perception and Clinical Intuition via Latent Memory Evolution}, \n author={Chunzheng Zhu and Jiaqi Zeng and Junyu Jiang and Jianxin Lin and Yijun Wang},\n year={2026},\n eprint={2604.26283},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26283}, \n}\n@inproceedings{zhu2025pathology,\n title={Pathology-Aware Prototype Evolution via LLM-Driven Semantic Disambiguation for Multicenter Diabetic Retinopathy Diagnosis},\n author={Zhu, Chunzheng and Lin, Yangfang and Shao, Jialin and Lin, Jianxin and Wang, Yijun},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia},\n pages={9196--9205},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhu2026medeyes,\n title={MedEyes: Learning Dynamic Visual Focus for Medical Progressive Diagnosis},\n author={Zhu, Chunzheng and Lin, Yangfang and Chen, Shen and Wang, Yijun and Lin, Jianxin},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},\n volume={40},\n number={16},\n pages={13916--13924},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{xiao2026not,\n title={Not just what’s there: Enabling clip to comprehend negated visual descriptions without fine-tuning},\n author={Xiao, Junhao and Wu, Zhiyu and Lin, Hao and Chen, Yi and Liu, Yahui and Zhao, Xiaoran and Wang, Zixu and He, Zejiang},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},\n volume={40},\n number={13},\n pages={10978--10986},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{lyu2026photocraft,\n title={PhotoCraft: Agentic Reasoning with Hierarchical Self-Evolving Memory for Deep Image Search},\n author={Lyu, Kailin and Yuan, Zhiqiang and He, Jianwei and Yan, Qiwei and Su, Xuanbo and Hu, Nanxing and Liu, Yang and Hao, Ce and Qin, Shengqian and Hu, Lianyu and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.03099},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{feng2026onethinker,\n title={Onethinker: All-in-one reasoning model for image and video},\n author={Feng, Kaituo and Zhang, Manyuan and Li, Hongyu and Fan, Kaixuan and Chen, Shuang and Jiang, Yilei and Zheng, Dian and Sun, Peiwen and Zhang, Yiyuan and Sun, Haoze and others},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={5432--5443},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{li2024seed,\n title={Seed-bench: Benchmarking multimodal large language models},\n author={Li, Bohao and Ge, Yuying and Ge, Yixiao and Wang, Guangzhi and Wang, Rui and Zhang, Ruimao and Shan, Ying},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={13299--13308},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{singh2019towards,\n title={Towards VQA Models That Can Read},\n author={Singh, Amanpreet and Natarjan, Vivek and Shah, Meet and Jiang, Yu and Chen, Xinlei and Parikh, Devi and Rohrbach, Marcus},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={8317-8326},\n year={2019}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{masry2022chartqa,\n title={Chartqa: A benchmark for question answering about charts with visual and logical reasoning},\n author={Masry, Ahmed and Tan, Jia Qing and Joty, Shafiq and Hoque, Enamul and others},\n booktitle={Findings of the association for computational linguistics: ACL 2022},\n pages={2263--2279},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{hu2026illava,\n title={illava: An image is worth fewer than 1/3 input tokens in large multimodal models},\n author={Hu, Lianyu and Gao, Liqing and Shang, Fanhua and Wan, Liang and Feng, Wei},\n journal={International Conference on Learning Representation},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{hu2026tvi,\n title={TVI-CoT: Text-Visual Interleaved Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Multimodal Understanding},\n author={Hu, Lianyu and Ma, Xiaoyu and Liao, Zeqin and Liu, Yang},\n journal={International Conference on Machine Learning},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{wang2025diffusion,\n title={Diffusion models for 3D generation: A survey},\n author={Wang, Chen and Peng, Hao-Yang and Liu, Ying-Tian and Gu, Jiatao and Hu, Shi-Min},\n journal={Computational Visual Media},\n volume={11},\n number={1},\n pages={1--28},\n year={2025},\n publisher={TUP}\n}\n\n@article{li2024clip,\n title={CLIP-SP: Vision-language model with adaptive prompting for scene parsing},\n author={Li, Jiaao and Huang, Yixiang and Wu, Ming and Zhang, Bin and Ji, Xu and Zhang, Chuang},\n journal={Computational Visual Media},\n volume={10},\n number={4},\n pages={741--752},\n year={2024},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{shi2026intelligent,\n title={Intelligent robot systems: a survey from the perspective of visual intelligence},\n author={Shi, Hengcan and Liu, Wen and Li, Zheng and Fang, Xinpu and Meng, Xiangfeng and Peng, Weixing and Zhong, Hang and Liu, Min and Wang, Yaonan},\n journal={Visual Intelligence},\n volume={4},\n number={1},\n pages={14},\n year={2026},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{wei2026sim,\n title={SIM-CoT: Supervised Implicit Chain-of-Thought},\n author={Wei, Xilin and Liu, Xiaoran and Zang, Yuhang and Dong, Xiaoyi and Cao, Yuhang and Wang, Jiaqi and Qiu, Xipeng and Lin, Dahua},\n journal={International Conference on Learning Representation},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{wang2026monet,\n title={Monet: Reasoning in latent visual space beyond images and language},\n author={Wang, Qixun and Shi, Yang and Wang, Yifei and Zhang, Yuanxing and Wan, Pengfei and Gai, Kun and Ying, Xianghua and Wang, Yisen},\n journal={IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{xu2025llava,\n title={Llava-cot: Let vision language models reason step-by-step},\n author={Xu, Guowei and Jin, Peng and Wu, Ziang and Li, Hao and Song, Yibing and Sun, Lichao and Yuan, Li},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision},\n pages={2087--2098},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2025video,\n title={Video-cot: A comprehensive dataset for spatiotemporal understanding of videos based on chain-of-thought},\n author={Zhang, Shuyi and Hao, Xiaoshuai and Tang, Yingbo and Zhang, Lingfeng and Wang, Pengwei and Wang, Zhongyuan and Ma, Hongxuan and Zhang, Shanghang},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia},\n pages={12745--12752},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{ye2025vla,\n title={Vla-r1: Enhancing reasoning in vision-language-action models},\n author={Ye, Angen and Zhang, Zeyu and Wang, Boyuan and Wang, Xiaofeng and Zhang, Dapeng and Zhu, Zheng},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.01623},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhao2025cot,\n title={Cot-vla: Visual chain-of-thought reasoning for vision-language-action models},\n author={Zhao, Qingqing and Lu, Yao and Kim, Moo Jin and Fu, Zipeng and Zhang, Zhuoyang and Wu, Yecheng and Li, Zhaoshuo and Ma, Qianli and Han, Song and Finn, Chelsea and others},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference},\n pages={1702--1713},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{zeng2026glm,\n title={GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering},\n author={Zeng, Aohan and Lv, Xin and Hou, Zhenyu and Du, Zhengxiao and Zheng, Qinkai and Chen, Bin and Yin, Da and Ge, Chendi and Xie, Chengxing and Wang, Cunxiang and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15763},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{shao2024visual,\n title={Visual cot: Advancing multi-modal language models with a comprehensive dataset and benchmark for chain-of-thought reasoning},\n author={Shao, Hao and Qian, Shengju and Xiao, Han and Song, Guanglu and Zong, Zhuofan and Wang, Letian and Liu, Yu and Li, Hongsheng},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={37},\n pages={8612--8642},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{yang2025qwen2,\n title={Qwen2. 5-xCoder: Multi-Agent Collaboration for Multilingual Code Instruction Tuning},\n author={Yang, Jian and Zhang, Wei and Miao, Yibo and Quan, Shanghaoran and Wu, Zhenhe and Peng, Qiyao and Yang, Liqun and Liu, Tianyu and Cui, Zeyu and Hui, Binyuan and others},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)},\n pages={13121--13131},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{singh2026openai,\n title={Openai gpt-5 system card},\n author={Singh, Aaditya and Fry, Adam and Perelman, Adam and Tart, Adam and Ganesh, Adi and El-Kishky, Ahmed and McLaughlin, Aidan and Low, Aiden and Ostrow, AJ and Ananthram, Akhila and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03267},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{he2025semcot,\n title={SemCoT: Accelerating Chain-of-Thought Reasoning through Semantically-Aligned Implicit Tokens},\n author={He, Yinhan and Zheng, Wendy and Zhu, Yaochen and Zheng, Zaiyi and Su, Lin and Vasudevan, Sriram and Guo, Qi and Hong, Liangjie and Li, Jundong},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{jaech2024openai,\n title={Openai o1 system card},\n author={Jaech, Aaron and Kalai, Adam and Lerer, Adam and Richardson, Adam and El-Kishky, Ahmed and Low, Aiden and Helyar, Alec and Madry, Aleksander and Beutel, Alex and Carney, Alex and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16720},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{huang2026step3,\n title={Step3-vl-10b technical report},\n author={Huang, Ailin and Yao, Chengyuan and Han, Chunrui and Wan, Fanqi and Guo, Hangyu and Lv, Haoran and Zhou, Hongyu and Wang, Jia and Zhou, Jian and Sun, Jianjian and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.09668},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{zhu2025internvl3,\n title={Internvl3: Exploring advanced training and test-time recipes for open-source multimodal models},\n author={Zhu, Jinguo and Wang, Weiyun and Chen, Zhe and Liu, Zhaoyang and Ye, Shenglong and Gu, Lixin and Tian, Hao and Duan, Yuchen and Su, Weijie and Shao, Jie and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10479},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{wei2022chain,\n title={Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models},\n author={Wei, Jason and Wang, Xuezhi and Schuurmans, Dale and Bosma, Maarten and Xia, Fei and Chi, Ed and Le, Quoc V and Zhou, Denny and others},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={35},\n pages={24824--24837},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{kojima2022large,\n title={Large language models are zero-shot reasoners},\n author={Kojima, Takeshi and Gu, Shixiang Shane and Reid, Machel and Matsuo, Yutaka and Iwasawa, Yusuke},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={35},\n pages={22199--22213},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{wang2022self,\n title={Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models},\n author={Wang, Xuezhi and Wei, Jason and Schuurmans, Dale and Le, Quoc and Chi, Ed and Narang, Sharan and Chowdhery, Aakanksha and Zhou, Denny},\n journal={International Conference on Learning Representation},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n% === Latent Reasoning ===\n@article{hao2024coconut,\n title={Training large language models to reason in a continuous latent space},\n author={Hao, Shibo and Sukhbaatar, Sainbayar and Su, DiJia and Li, Xian and Hu, Zhiting and Weston, Jason and Tian, Yuandong},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06769},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{shen2025codi,\n title={Codi: Compressing chain-of-thought into continuous space via self-distillation},\n author={Shen, Zhenyi and Yan, Hanqi and Zhang, Linhai and Hu, Zhanghao and Du, Yali and He, Yulan},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing},\n pages={677--693},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{deng2024explicit,\n title={From explicit cot to implicit cot: Learning to internalize cot step by step},\n author={Deng, Yuntian and Choi, Yejin and Shieber, Stuart},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14838},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{cheng2024compressed,\n title={Compressed chain of thought: Efficient reasoning through dense representations},\n author={Cheng, Jeffrey and Van Durme, Benjamin},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13171},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{xu2025softcot,\n title={Softcot: Soft chain-of-thought for efficient reasoning with llms},\n author={Xu, Yige and Guo, Xu and Zeng, Zhiwei and Miao, Chunyan},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)},\n pages={23336--23351},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{sun2025lacot,\n title={Latent chain-of-thought for visual reasoning},\n author={Sun, Guohao and Hua, Hang and Wang, Jian and Luo, Jiebo and Dianat, Sohail and Rabbani, Majid and Rao, Raghuveer and Tao, Zhiqiang},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.23925},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{li2025lvr,\n title={Latent visual reasoning},\n author={Li, Bangzheng and Sun, Ximeng and Liu, Jiang and Wang, Ze and Wu, Jialian and Yu, Xiaodong and Chen, Hao and Barsoum, Emad and Chen, Muhao and Liu, Zicheng},\n journal={International Conference on Learning Representation},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n% === Visual Latent Reasoning ===\n@article{liu2024llava,\n title={Visual instruction tuning},\n author={Liu, Haotian and Li, Chunyuan and Wu, Qingyang and Lee, Yong Jae},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={36},\n pages={34892--34916},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@misc{liu2024llavanext,\n title={Llavanext: Improved reasoning, ocr, and world knowledge},\n author={Liu, Haotian and Li, Chunyuan and Li, Yuheng and Li, Bo and Zhang, Yuanhan and Shen, Sheng and Lee, Yong Jae},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n% === Benchmarks ===\n@inproceedings{yue2024mmmu,\n title={Mmmu: A massive multi-discipline multimodal understanding and reasoning benchmark for expert agi},\n author={Yue, Xiang and Ni, Yuansheng and Zhang, Kai and Zheng, Tianyu and Liu, Ruoqi and Zhang, Ge and Stevens, Samuel and Jiang, Dongfu and Ren, Weiming and Sun, Yuxuan and others},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},\n pages={9556--9567},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{liu2024mmbench,\n title={Mmbench: Is your multi-modal model an all-around player?},\n author={Liu, Yuan and Duan, Haodong and Zhang, Yuanhan and Li, Bo and Zhang, Songyang and Zhao, Wangbo and Yuan, Yike and Wang, Jiaqi and He, Conghui and Liu, Ziwei and others},\n booktitle={European conference on computer vision},\n pages={216--233},\n year={2024},\n organization={Springer}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2024mathverse,\n title={Mathverse: Does your multi-modal llm truly see the diagrams in visual math problems?},\n author={Zhang, Renrui and Jiang, Dongzhi and Zhang, Yichi and Lin, Haokun and Guo, Ziyu and Qiu, Pengshuo and Zhou, Aojun and Lu, Pan and Chang, Kai-Wei and Qiao, Yu and others},\n booktitle={European Conference on Computer Vision},\n pages={169--186},\n year={2024},\n organization={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{lu2024mathvista,\n title={Mathvista: Evaluating mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts},\n author={Lu, Pan and Bansal, Hritik and Xia, Tony and Liu, Jiacheng and Li, Chunyuan and Hajishirzi, Hannaneh and Cheng, Hao and Chang, Kai-Wei and Galley, Michel and Gao, Jianfeng},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02255},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{lu2022scienceqa,\n title={Learn to explain: Multimodal reasoning via thought chains for science question answering},\n author={Lu, Pan and Mishra, Swaroop and Xia, Tanglin and Qiu, Liang and Chang, Kai-Wei and Zhu, Song-Chun and Tafjord, Oyvind and Clark, Peter and Kalyan, Ashwin},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={35},\n pages={2507--2521},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{chen2024mmstar,\n title={Are we on the right way for evaluating large vision-language models?},\n author={Chen, Lin and Li, Jinsong and Dong, Xiaoyi and Zhang, Pan and Zang, Yuhang and Chen, Zehui and Duan, Haodong and Wang, Jiaqi and Qiao, Yu and Lin, Dahua and others},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={37},\n pages={27056--27087},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{kembhavi2016ai2d,\n title={A diagram is worth a dozen images},\n author={Kembhavi, Aniruddha and Salvato, Mike and Kolve, Eric and Seo, Minjoon and Hajishirzi, Hannaneh and Farhadi, Ali},\n booktitle={European conference on computer vision},\n pages={235--251},\n year={2016},\n organization={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{ying2024mmtbench,\n title={Mmt-bench: A comprehensive multimodal benchmark for evaluating large vision-language models towards multitask agi},\n author={Ying, Kaining and Meng, Fanqing and Wang, Jin and Li, Zhiqian and Lin, Han and Yang, Yue and Zhang, Hao and Zhang, Wenbo and Lin, Yuqi and Liu, Shuo and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16006},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n\n% === Multimodal CoT ===\n@article{zhang2023multimodal,\n title={Multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning in language models},\n author={Zhang, Zhuosheng and Zhang, Aston and Li, Mu and Zhao, Hai and Karypis, George and Smola, Alex},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00923},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n% === Efficient Reasoning ===\n@article{deng2023implicit,\n title={Implicit chain of thought reasoning via knowledge distillation},\n author={Deng, Yuntian and Prasad, Kiran and Fernandez, Roland and Smolensky, Paul and Chaudhary, Vishrav and Shieber, Stuart},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01460},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{loshchilov2019adamw,\n title={Decoupled weight decay regularization},\n author={Loshchilov, Ilya and Hutter, Frank},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101},\n year={2017}\n}\n\n@article{guo2025deepseek,\n title={Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning},\n author={Guo, Daya and Yang, Dejian and Zhang, Haowei and Song, Junxiao and Wang, Peiyi and Zhu, Qihao and Xu, Runxin and Zhang, Ruoyu and Ma, Shirong and Bi, Xiao and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@misc{qwq2024,\n title={Qwq: Reflect deeply on the boundaries of the unknown},\n author={Team, Qwen},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n% === Recent MLLMs (2024-2025) ===\n@article{wang2024qwen2vl,\n title={Qwen2-vl: Enhancing vision-language model's perception of the world at any resolution},\n author={Wang, Peng and Bai, Shuai and Tan, Sinan and Wang, Shijie and Fan, Zhihao and Bai, Jinze and Chen, Keqin and Liu, Xuejing and Wang, Jialin and Ge, Wenbin and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12191},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{li2024llavaonevision,\n title={Llava-onevision: Easy visual task transfer},\n author={Li, Bo and Zhang, Yuanhan and Guo, Dong and Zhang, Renrui and Li, Feng and Zhang, Hao and Zhang, Kaichen and Zhang, Peiyuan and Li, Yanwei and Liu, Ziwei and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03326},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{chen2024internvl25,\n title={Expanding performance boundaries of open-source multimodal models with model, data, and test-time scaling},\n author={Chen, Zhe and Wang, Weiyun and Cao, Yue and Liu, Yangzhou and Gao, Zhangwei and Cui, Erfei and Zhu, Jinguo and Ye, Shenglong and Tian, Hao and Liu, Zhaoyang and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05271},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{tong2024cambrian,\n title={Cambrian-1: A fully open, vision-centric exploration of multimodal llms},\n author={Tong, Peter and Brown, Ellis and Wu, Penghao and Woo, Sanghyun and Iyer, Adithya Jairam Vedagiri and Akula, Sai Charitha and Yang, Shusheng and Yang, Jihan and Middepogu, Manoj and Wang, Ziteng and others},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={37},\n pages={87310--87356},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{snell2024scaling,\n title={Scaling llm test-time compute optimally can be more effective than scaling model parameters},\n author={Snell, Charlie and Lee, Jaehoon and Xu, Kelvin and Kumar, Aviral},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03314},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zhang2024chain,\n title={Chain of thought empowers transformers to solve inherently serial problems},\n author={Li, Zhiyuan and Liu, Hong and Zhou, Denny and Ma, Tengyu},\n booktitle={The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{xu2025towards,\n title={Towards reasoning era: A survey of long chain-of-thought for reasoning large language models},\n author={Chen, Qiguang and Qin, Libo and Liu, Jinhao and Peng, Dengyun and Guan, Jiannan and Wang, Peng and Hu, Mengkang and Zhou, Yuhang and Gao, Te and Che, Wanxiang},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09567},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{chen2024expanding,\n title={Thinking tokens for language modeling},\n author={Herel, David and Mikolov, Tomas},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.08644},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{tan2025colar,\n title={Think silently, think fast: Dynamic latent compression of llm reasoning chains},\n author={Tan, Wenhui and Li, Jiaze and Ju, Jianzhong and Luo, Zhenbo and Song, Ruihua and Luan, Jian},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16552},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{bai2025qwen3,\n title={Qwen3-vl technical report},\n author={Bai, Shuai and Cai, Yuxuan and Chen, Ruizhe and Chen, Keqin and Chen, Xionghui and Cheng, Zesen and Deng, Lianghao and Ding, Wei and Gao, Chang and Ge, Chunjiang and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{yang2025qwen3,\n title={Qwen3 technical report},\n author={Yang, An and Li, Anfeng and Yang, Baosong and Zhang, Beichen and Hui, Binyuan and Zheng, Bo and Yu, Bowen and Gao, Chang and Huang, Chengen and Lv, Chenxu and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n% chen2025internvl3 removed: duplicate of zhu2025internvl3\n\n@article{wang2025mcot_survey,\n title={Multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning: A comprehensive survey},\n author={Wang, Yaoting and Wu, Shengqiong and Zhang, Yuecheng and Yan, Shuicheng and Liu, Ziwei and Luo, Jiebo and Fei, Hao},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.12605},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{chen2025latent_survey,\n title={Reasoning beyond language: A comprehensive survey on latent chain-of-thought reasoning},\n author={Chen, Xinghao and Zhao, Anhao and Xia, Heming and Lu, Xuan and Wang, Hanlin and Chen, Yanjun and Zhang, Wei and Wang, Jian and Li, Wenjie and Shen, Xiaoyu},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16782},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{feng2025onethinker,\n title={Onethinker: All-in-one reasoning model for image and video},\n author={Feng, Kaituo and Zhang, Manyuan and Li, Hongyu and Fan, Kaixuan and Chen, Shuang and Jiang, Yilei and Zheng, Dian and Sun, Peiwen and Zhang, Yiyuan and Sun, Haoze and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.03043},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{shao2024deepseekmath,\n title={Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models},\n author={Shao, Zhihong and Wang, Peiyi and Zhu, Qihao and Xu, Runxin and Song, Junxiao and Bi, Xiao and Zhang, Haowei and Zhang, Mingchuan and Li, YK and Wu, Yang and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[runningheads]{llncs}\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Include basic ECCV package\n \n% TODO REVIEW: Insert your submission number below by replacing '*****'\n% TODO FINAL: Comment out the following line for the camera-ready version\n%\\usepackage[review,year=2026,ID=7421]{eccv}\n% TODO FINAL: Un-comment the following line for the camera-ready version\n\\usepackage{eccv}\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Other packages\n\n% Commonly used abbreviations (\\eg, \\ie, \\etc, \\cf, \\etal, etc.)\n\\usepackage{eccvabbrv}\n\n% Include other packages here, before hyperref.\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{amssymb}\n\\usepackage{multirow}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{colortbl}\n\\usepackage{makecell}\n\\usepackage{subcaption}\n\\definecolor{seagreen}{RGB}{46, 139, 87}\n\n% The \"axessiblity\" package can be found at: https://ctan.org/pkg/axessibility?lang=en\n\\usepackage[accsupp]{axessibility} % Improves PDF readability for those with disabilities.\n\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n% Hyperref package\n\n% TODO FINAL: Comment out the following line for the camera-ready version\n%\\usepackage[pagebackref,breaklinks,colorlinks,citecolor=eccvblue]{hyperref}\n% TODO FINAL: Un-comment the following line for the camera-ready version\n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\n% Support for ORCID icon\n\\usepackage{orcidlink}\n\n% Custom commands\n\\newcommand{\\ours}{\\textsc{CoLT}}\n\\newcommand{\\Lfwd}{\\mathcal{L}_{\\text{fwd}}}\n\\newcommand{\\Lbwd}{\\mathcal{L}_{\\text{bwd}}}\n\\newcommand{\\Lint}{\\mathcal{L}_{\\text{int}}}\n\\newcommand{\\Ltask}{\\mathcal{L}_{\\text{task}}}\n\\definecolor{bestcolor}{rgb}{0.85,0.92,0.85}\n\\definecolor{Gray}{gray}{0.88}\n\\begin{document}\n\n% ---------------------------------------------------------------\n\\title{CoLT: Teaching Multi-Modal Models to Think\\\\with Chain of Latent Thoughts} \n\n\\titlerunning{CoLT: Chain of Latent Thoughts}\n\n\\author{Lianyu Hu\\inst{1}\\orcidlink{0000-0003-2470-8110} \\and\nShengqian Qin\\inst{2}\\and\nZeqin Liao\\inst{1} \\and\nQing Guo\\inst{3,4}\\thanks{Corresponding author} \\and\nLiang Wan\\inst{5} \\and\nWei Feng\\inst{5} \\and\nYang Liu\\inst{1}}\n\n%\\author{Lianyu Hu\\inst{1}\\orcidlink{0000-0003-2470-8110} \\and\n% Shengqian Qin\\inst{2}\\orcidlink{1111-2222-3333-4444} \\and\n% Zeqin Liao\\inst{1}\\orcidlink{2222--3333-4444-5555} \\and\n% Qing Guo\\inst{3}\\orcidlink{0000-0003-0974-9299} \\and\n% Liang Wan\\inst{4}\\orcidlink{2222--3333-4444-5555} \\and\n% Wei Feng\\inst{4}\\orcidlink{0000-0003-3809-1086} \\and\n% Yang Liu\\inst{1}\\orcidlink{2222--3333-4444-5555}}\n\\authorrunning{Lianyu Hu et al.}\n\\institute{Nanyang Technological University, Singapore \\and Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China \\and NKIARI, Shenzhen Futian, China \\and AAIS \\& VCIP, Nankai University, China \\and Tianjin University, China}\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\\begin{abstract}\nChain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has enabled multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) to tackle complex visual reasoning tasks by generating explicit intermediate reasoning steps in natural language. However, this text-based reasoning paradigm is inherently slow at inference time with even thousands of tokens and fundamentally constrained by the expressiveness of natural language. In this paper, we propose \\ours{} (\\textbf{C}hain \\textbf{o}f \\textbf{L}atent \\textbf{T}houghts), a novel framework that teaches multi-modal models to reason through a chain of latent thought representations instead of verbose text tokens, which can perform thinking with as few as 3 steps. Naively forcing the model to think with latent states easily produces meaningless semantics and makes training unstable. To effectively regulate the latent reasoning process, we introduce a lightweight external decoder that provides step-level supervision for each latent reasoning step in two complementary directions: a \\emph{forward} mode that decodes latent thoughts into the textual reasoning of the next step, and a \\emph{backward} mode that aligns decoder hidden states with the model's latent thoughts given preceding textual context. We further incorporate \\emph{internal supervision} that encourages coherent step-by-step latent transitions. The decoder and internal supervision are removed during inference to maintain high efficiency of latent reasoning. Extensive experiments on eight benchmarks demonstrate that \\ours{} not only outperforms existing latent reasoning methods such as CODI and SIM-CoT, but also surpasses latent visual reasoning approaches that rely on auxiliary images with costly annotation requirements. Compared to text CoT methods, \\ours{} can notably reduce the inference time by 10.1$\\times$ and text decoding time by 22.6$\\times$. Code is released at \\url{https://github.com/hulianyuyy/CoLT}.\n\n\\keywords{Latent reasoning \\and Multi-modal models \\and Chain-of-thought}\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\\section{Introduction}\n\\label{sec:intro}\nMulti-modal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in visual understanding and reasoning~\\cite{lyu2026photocraft,zhu2025internvl3,bai2025qwen3,huang2026step3,wang2025diffusion,li2024clip,shi2026intelligent,hu2026illava,hu2026tvi}. By integrating vision encoders with powerful language model backbones, these models can process both visual and textual information to solve complex tasks ranging from visual question answering to mathematical problem solving~\\cite{lu2024mathvista,yue2024mmmu}. A key ingredient underlying their success is chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning~\\cite{wei2022chain}, which instructs models to decompose problems into intermediate reasoning steps expressed in natural language before arriving at a final answer. Recent reasoning models such as DeepSeek-R1~\\cite{guo2025deepseek} and QwQ~\\cite{qwq2024} have further amplified this paradigm through long-form CoT, establishing it as the dominant reasoning strategy.\n\nDespite its effectiveness, text-based CoT suffers from several fundamental limitations. First, generating lengthy reasoning chains in natural language significantly increases inference latency, as each reasoning token must be produced autoregressively. This becomes more severe as the thinking process typically consumes hundreds or even thousands of tokens~\\cite{jaech2024openai,guo2025deepseek,huang2026step3}, constituting the heaviest computing burden during inference. Second, the decoded textual expressions are inherently deterministic: once a reasoning step is committed to a specific natural language form, it collapses the rich distribution of potential solving trajectories into a single surface realization, eliminating alternative reasoning pathways. Third, errors made in early reasoning steps can propagate and compound through subsequent steps, a phenomenon that is particularly problematic in long reasoning chains~\\cite{wang2022self,li2025lvr}.\n\nRecent work has begun to explore \\emph{latent reasoning} as an alternative, where the intermediate thinking process occurs in a continuous representation space rather than through explicit text generation. CoCoNut~\\cite{hao2024coconut} pioneered this direction by training language models to reason in a continuous latent space. CODI~\\cite{shen2025codi} further explored compressing chain-of-thought into continuous representations via self-distillation. SemCoT~\\cite{he2025semcot} tried to align latent thoughts with textual CoT via a trained sentence transformer. However, these approaches are primarily designed for text-only language models and do not address the unique challenges of multi-modal reasoning. More recently, latent visual reasoning~\\cite{sun2025lacot,li2025lvr} leverages auxiliary images to generate latent thought tokens, but introduces significant overhead by requiring additional image annotations and specialized encoders, resulting in high labelling costs and limited scalability.\n\nIn this paper, we propose \\ours{} (\\textbf{C}hain \\textbf{o}f \\textbf{L}atent \\textbf{T}houghts), a novel framework that enables multi-modal models to perform effective latent reasoning with principled supervision. A critical challenge is that naively forcing the model to perform latent thinking, \\ie, simply replacing text tokens with continuous vectors during reasoning, easily produces semantically meaningless latent representations and causes severe training instability, as the unconstrained continuous space provides no inductive bias for structured reasoning. To overcome this, we introduce fine-grained step-level supervision through a lightweight external decoder operating in two complementary modes: \n\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item \\textbf{Forward decoding supervision}: The decoder takes the preceding latent thoughts as input and is trained to decode the textual reasoning content of the next step, ensuring that latent thoughts encode meaningful and progressive reasoning information.\n \\item \\textbf{Backward decoding supervision}: The decoder receives the preceding textual thoughts as input, and the generated hidden states are enforced to approach the latent thought representations, thereby anchoring the latent space to the semantic structure of explicit reasoning.\n\\end{itemize}\n\nIn addition to these external supervision signals, we introduce an \\textbf{internal supervision} mechanism that directly encourages coherent transitions between consecutive latent steps by training the model to predict the next step's representation from the current one. The combination of forward, backward, and internal supervision provides a comprehensive training signal that effectively regularizes the latent reasoning process without requiring any auxiliary visual annotations.\n\nExtensive experiments on eight multimodal benchmarks demonstrate that \\ours{} consistently outperforms existing latent reasoning methods, and surpasses latent visual reasoning approaches that rely on costly image-based supervision. Compared to text CoT methods, CoLT can notably reduce the inference time by 10.1$\\times$ and text decoding time by 22.6$\\times$, achieving superior efficiency. Plentiful visualizations verify that \\ours{} can successfully encode meaningful thinking patterns within the latent thoughts. \n\n%\\textbf{forward decoding} which decodes latent thoughts into the textual reasoning of the next step, ensuring that latent thoughts encode meaningful and progressive reasoning information, and \\textbf{backward decoding} which aligns decoder hidden states with latent thoughts, anchors the latent space to the semantic structure of explicit reasoning by . We further introduce \\textbf{internal supervision} that encourages coherent step-to-step transitions. Together, these three signals comprehensively regularize the latent reasoning process without any auxiliary visual annotations.\n\n%Extensive experiments on eight multimodal benchmarks demonstrate that \\ours{} consistently outperforms existing latent reasoning methods and surpasses latent visual reasoning approaches that rely on costly image-based supervision. Compared to text CoT methods, \\ours{} can notably reduce the inference time by 10.3$\\times$ and text decoding time by 20.9$\\times$, achieving superior efficiency.\n\n% \\begin{itemize}\n% \\item We propose \\ours{}, a novel framework for multi-modal latent reasoning that replaces verbose text-based chain-of-thought with efficient latent thought chains, enabling faster and more expressive reasoning.\n% \\item We introduce a principled supervision mechanism combining forward decoding, backward decoding, and internal latent prediction through a lightweight external decoder, providing comprehensive regulation of the latent reasoning process without auxiliary annotations.\n% \\item Extensive experiments on MMMU, MMBench, MathVerse, MathVista, ScienceQA, MMStar, AI2D, and MMT-Bench demonstrate that \\ours{} consistently outperforms existing latent reasoning methods including CoCoNut and CODI, and surpasses latent visual reasoning approaches that rely on costly image-based supervision.\n% \\end{itemize}\n\n\n\\section{Related Work}\n\\label{sec:related}\n\n\\subsection{Multi-Modal Large Language Models}\n\nThe rapid advancement of large language models has catalyzed the development of multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) that integrate visual perception with language understanding~\\cite{liu2024llava,zhu2025internvl3,zhu2026medeyes,xiao2026not,zhu2025pathology,zhu2026medsynapsevbridgingvisualperception,bai2026tgo,bai2026prism,chen2024internvl25,bai2025qwen3,huang2026step3,fu2026neurosymactive,fu2026s}. LLaVA~\\cite{liu2024llava} pioneered the visual instruction tuning paradigm, and its successors have significantly advanced the field: LLaVA-NeXT~\\cite{liu2024llavanext} improved reasoning and OCR capabilities, while LLaVA-OneVision~\\cite{li2024llavaonevision} unified image, video, and multi-image understanding into a single framework. The InternVL series has pushed open-source performance, with InternVL 2.5~\\cite{chen2024internvl25} achieving results competitive with commercial systems, and InternVL3~\\cite{zhu2025internvl3} further advancing capabilities via mixed-modality pre-training. In the Qwen-VL family, Qwen2-VL~\\cite{wang2024qwen2vl} introduced native dynamic resolution support, and Qwen3-VL~\\cite{bai2025qwen3} strengthened document parsing and long-video comprehension. Step3-VL~\\cite{huang2026step3} conducted a vision-centric exploration of MLLM design choices, providing insights into the role of visual representations. While these models have made substantial progress, their reasoning capabilities still heavily rely on text-based intermediate representations, which our work aims to address through latent reasoning.\n\n\\subsection{Chain-of-Thought Reasoning}\n\nChain-of-thought (CoT) prompting~\\cite{wei2022chain} has emerged as a powerful technique that enables language models to solve complex problems by generating intermediate reasoning steps. Li \\etal~\\cite{zhang2024chain} showed that CoT empowers transformers to solve inherently serial problems that are otherwise intractable for constant-depth models. Recent work has dramatically scaled this paradigm: OpenAI o1~\\cite{jaech2024openai} demonstrated that training with long chains of thought yields substantial gains on scientific and mathematical benchmarks, while DeepSeek-R1~\\cite{guo2025deepseek} showed that reinforcement learning can incentivize emergent reasoning capabilities. More recent works like OpenAI GPT-5~\\cite{singh2026openai}, GLM-5~\\cite{zeng2026glm} and Qwen2.5-xCoder~\\cite{yang2025qwen2} further verify that long-form CoT is the key protocol to build high-intelligence agents.\n\nIn the multi-modal domain, CoT reasoning has been extensively explored across diverse modalities. Image analysis~\\cite{shao2024visual,xu2025llava}, video understanding~\\cite{zhang2025video} and embodied intelligence~\\cite{zhao2025cot,ye2025vla} have fully witnessed the power of CoT reasoning in promoting understanding performance via long-chain thoughts. Wang \\etal~\\cite{wang2025mcot_survey} provided a comprehensive survey categorizing multimodal CoT methods. Despite strong performance, these explicit approaches incur significant computational costs due to lengthy text generation, often consuming thousands of tokens~\\cite{xu2025towards}. This motivates the exploration of more efficient alternatives that preserve reasoning quality while reducing the generation burden.\n\n\\subsection{Latent Reasoning}\n\nThe limitations of text-based reasoning have motivated a growing body of work on latent reasoning that operates in continuous representation spaces~\\cite{chen2025latent_survey}. CoCoNut~\\cite{hao2024coconut} introduced a pioneering framework that trains language models to reason in a continuous latent space, replacing discrete text tokens with continuous thought vectors, and demonstrated that the continuous space can encode multiple alternative reasoning paths. CODI~\\cite{shen2025codi} proposed compressing chain-of-thought into continuous representations via self-distillation. SoftCoT~\\cite{xu2025softcot} introduced a small assistant model to generate continuous soft thought tokens, projected into the main LLM’s embedding space to boost reasoning accuracy and efficiency. CoLaR~\\cite{tan2025colar} introduced dynamic latent compression that adaptively compresses reasoning chains based on problem difficulty. SIM-CoT~\\cite{wei2026sim} used an auxiliary decoder to provide step-level implicit supervision, which stabilizes latent reasoning states to avoid collapse and enhances interpretability.\n\nIn the multi-modal setting, latent visual reasoning~\\cite{li2025lvr,wang2026monet} has emerged as an approach that uses auxiliary images to generate latent thought tokens for reasoning. LVR~\\cite{li2025lvr} performed implicit visual inference by requiring the latent visual representation to approximate the encoded features of auxiliary images. MoNet~\\cite{wang2026monet} introduced a three-stage framework to gradually internalize auxiliary image features into the generation process of the backbone model. However, these approaches require auxiliary image annotations or generation models, resulting in high labelling costs and limited applicability to scenarios where visual intermediates are not readily available. Our proposed \\ours{} differs fundamentally by operating entirely in the language model's latent space, requiring no auxiliary visual annotations while providing comprehensive supervision through forward, backward, and internal signals.\n\n\n%=============================================\n\n\\section{Method}\n\\label{sec:method}\n\nIn this section, we present \\ours{}, our framework for teaching multi-modal models to reason through latent thought representations. We first provide an overview of the framework (\\cref{sec:overview}), then describe the latent thought representation (\\cref{sec:latent_repr}), the external decoder supervision combining forward and backward decoding (\\cref{sec:decoder_supervision}), the internal step-level supervision (\\cref{sec:internal_supervision}), and the complete training objective (\\cref{sec:training}).\n\n\\subsection{Overview}\n\\label{sec:overview}\n\nGiven a multi-modal input consisting of an image $\\mathbf{v}$ and a text query $\\mathbf{x}$, a standard MLLM first encodes the image through a vision encoder to obtain visual tokens $\\mathbf{z}_v = \\text{Encoder}(\\mathbf{v})$, which are concatenated with the text tokens as input to the language model. In text-based CoT, the model generates explicit reasoning steps $\\mathbf{r}_1, \\mathbf{r}_2, \\ldots, \\mathbf{r}_L$ as natural language text, followed by the final answer $\\mathbf{y}$:\n\\begin{equation}\n P(\\mathbf{y} | \\mathbf{v}, \\mathbf{x}) = \\sum_{\\mathbf{r}_{1:L}} P(\\mathbf{y} | \\mathbf{r}_{1:L}, \\mathbf{v}, \\mathbf{x}) \\prod_{l=1}^{L} P(\\mathbf{r}_l | \\mathbf{r}_{<l}, \\mathbf{v}, \\mathbf{x}).\n \\label{eq:cot}\n\\end{equation}\n\n\\ours{} replaces the text reasoning steps with latent thought vectors $\\mathbf{h}_1, \\mathbf{h}_2, \\ldots, \\mathbf{h}_K \\in \\mathbb{R}^d$ with $K \\ll L$, where $d$ denotes the hidden dimension of the language model. The model directly produces latent representations at designated reasoning positions, bypassing the text generation bottleneck while preserving multi-path exploration in the latent space:\n\\begin{equation}\n P(\\mathbf{y} | \\mathbf{v}, \\mathbf{x}) = P(\\mathbf{y} | \\mathbf{h}_{1:K}, \\mathbf{v}, \\mathbf{x}),\n \\label{eq:colt}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere each $\\mathbf{h}_k$ is obtained from the language model's hidden states at the corresponding latent thought position.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n\\centerline{\\includegraphics[width=1.0\\textwidth]{./figures/figure1.pdf}}\n \\caption{Comparison of reasoning paradigms and overview of \\ours{}. Left: (1)~text CoT generates verbose reasoning tokens before the answer; (2)~latent reasoning replaces text with latent states but lacks explicit supervision; (3)~latent visual reasoning aligns latent states with extra image annotations via an encoder. Right: \\ours{} generates latent thought vectors $\\mathbf{h}_1, \\ldots, \\mathbf{h}_K$ regulated by two complementary mechanisms: external step-level supervision (a decoder $D_\\phi$ operating in forward and backward modes) and internal step-to-step prediction.}\n\\label{fig:overview}\n\n\\end{figure}\n\nThe key challenge in latent reasoning is ensuring that the latent thoughts encode meaningful and structured reasoning information, despite being unconstrained continuous vectors. The core contribution of \\ours{} is to introduce fine-grained \\emph{step-level supervision} that guides the latent thinking process. Specifically, we design two complementary supervision mechanisms:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item \\textbf{External decoder supervision} (\\cref{sec:decoder_supervision}): We introduce a lightweight external decoder $D_\\phi$, a smaller language model from the same model family as the backbone that shares the same tokenizer and vocabulary. The decoder provides step-level supervision from two directions: \\emph{forward decoding} that decodes latent thoughts into the textual reasoning of the next step, and \\emph{backward decoding} that aligns decoder hidden states with the model's latent thoughts given preceding textual context.\n%A lightweight external decoder $D_\\phi$, a smaller language model from the same family as the backbone, provides step-level supervision from two directions: \\emph{forward decoding} that decodes latent thoughts into the textual reasoning of the next step, and \\emph{backward decoding} that aligns decoder hidden states with the model's latent thoughts.\n \\item \\textbf{Internal step-level supervision} (\\cref{sec:internal_supervision}): A lightweight projection head that encourages coherent transitions between consecutive latent steps by predicting the next step's representation from the current one.\n\\end{itemize}\nTogether, these signals comprehensively regulate the latent reasoning process, ensuring that each latent thought encodes progressively meaningful semantics. \\Cref{fig:overview} compares \\ours{} with existing reasoning paradigms (text CoT, latent reasoning, and latent visual reasoning) and illustrates our framework.\n\n\\subsection{Latent Thought Representation}\n\\label{sec:latent_repr}\n\nTo enable structured latent reasoning, we divide the reasoning process into $K$ discrete steps based on the logical structure of the chain-of-thought annotations. At each step, instead of generating explicit text tokens, the model directly produces a hidden state that serves as the latent thought vector. No special tokens are introduced into the vocabulary, and the latent thoughts exist purely as continuous hidden representations. The latent thought at step $k$ is obtained from the last hidden layer of the language model:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\mathbf{h}_k = \\text{LM}^{\\text{last}}(\\mathbf{z}_v, \\mathbf{x}, \\mathbf{h}_1, \\ldots, \\mathbf{h}_{k-1}) \\in \\mathbb{R}^d,\n \\label{eq:latent_thought}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\text{LM}^{\\text{last}}(\\cdot)$ extracts the last-layer hidden state at the current reasoning position. Each latent thought $\\mathbf{h}_k$ is directly fed back into the language model as the input embedding for the next position, allowing subsequent latent thoughts and the final answer to attend to all preceding latent representations through the standard self-attention mechanism. This design preserves the autoregressive nature of the language model while enabling reasoning in the continuous latent space, avoiding any overhead from extending the model's vocabulary.\n\nDuring training, we assume access to paired data where explicit text reasoning chains $\\mathbf{r}_1, \\ldots, \\mathbf{r}_L$ are available (from existing CoT annotations or distilled from a teacher model). Each latent thought corresponds to $\\frac{L}{K}$ consecutive textual tokens. The latent thought vectors are supervised to encode the same reasoning information through the mechanisms described below, and at inference time, the model uses only the latent thoughts without generating any text reasoning.\n\n\\subsection{External Decoder Supervision}\n\\label{sec:decoder_supervision}\n\nThe external decoder $D_\\phi$ provides step-level supervision from two complementary directions: forward decoding that ensures latent thoughts encode sufficient information to produce textual reasoning, and backward decoding that anchors the latent space to the semantic structure of explicit reasoning chains.\n\n\\textbf{Forward decoding.} The forward decoding supervision ensures that the latent thoughts encode sufficient information to reconstruct the explicit reasoning process. The external decoder $D_\\phi$ receives the preceding latent thought $\\mathbf{h}_{k}$ as input and is trained to decode the textual reasoning content of the next step $\\mathbf{r}_{k+1}$:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\hat{\\mathbf{r}}_{k+1} = D_\\phi( \\mathbf{h}_k),\n \\label{eq:forward_decode}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $D_\\phi$ autoregressively generates the text tokens conditioned on the preceding latent thoughts. Since $D_\\phi$ is a smaller language model from the same model family and shares the same vocabulary as the main backbone, it can naturally decode the latent thoughts into coherent textual reasoning. The forward decoding loss is defined as the negative log-likelihood of the ground-truth textual reasoning:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\Lfwd = -\\frac{1}{K} \\sum_{k=0}^{K-1} \\sum_{t=1}^{|\\mathbf{r}_{k+1}|} \\log P_{D_\\phi}(r_{k+1,t} | r_{k+1,<t}, \\mathbf{h}_{k}),\n \\label{eq:loss_fwd}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $r_{k+1,t}$ is the $t$-th token of the $(k+1)$-th reasoning step. This forward supervision provides a strong training signal: the latent thought at each step must capture enough information to enable accurate generation of the next reasoning step. The gradients from the decoder flow back through the latent thoughts to the main language model, encouraging the formation of informative latent representations.\n\n\\textbf{Backward decoding.} While forward decoding maps from latent to text, backward decoding provides the reverse constraint by anchoring the latent space to the semantic structure of text reasoning. The decoder $D_\\phi$ receives the preceding textual reasoning steps $\\mathbf{r}_{k-1}$ as input and produces a hidden state $\\tilde{\\mathbf{h}}_k$ trained to align with the model's latent thought:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\tilde{\\mathbf{h}}_k = D_\\phi^{\\text{last}}(\\mathbf{r}_{k-1}),\n \\label{eq:backward_encode}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $D_\\phi^{\\text{last}}$ extracts the last-layer hidden state of the decoder after processing the text input. Since $D_\\phi$ belongs to the same model family and shares the same vocabulary as the main backbone, the decoder's text-conditioned hidden states naturally reside in a compatible representation space, enabling effective alignment without additional projection layers. The backward decoding loss enforces alignment between $\\tilde{\\mathbf{h}}_k$ and the corresponding latent thought $\\mathbf{h}_k$:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\Lbwd = \\frac{1}{K} \\sum_{k=1}^{K} \\left\\| \\frac{\\tilde{\\mathbf{h}}_k}{\\|\\tilde{\\mathbf{h}}_k\\|} - \\frac{\\text{sg}(\\mathbf{h}_k)}{\\|\\text{sg}(\\mathbf{h}_k)\\|} \\right\\|^2,\n \\label{eq:loss_bwd}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\text{sg}(\\cdot)$ denotes the stop-gradient operator applied to prevent the latent thoughts from collapsing to match trivial decoder outputs. The normalization ensures that alignment is measured in direction rather than magnitude, providing more stable training dynamics. Together, forward and backward signals provide comprehensive decoder-based regulation: forward decoding ensures the latent thoughts \\emph{can produce} reasoning text, while backward decoding ensures they \\emph{align with} the semantic content of reasoning steps.\n\n\\subsection{Internal Step-Level Supervision}\n\\label{sec:internal_supervision}\n\nBeyond the external decoder supervision, we introduce an internal supervision mechanism that directly regularizes the transitions between consecutive latent thought steps. The key intuition is that adjacent latent steps should have a predictable relationship, mirroring the logical progression in explicit reasoning chains. We implement this through a lightweight projection head $f_\\theta: \\mathbb{R}^d \\to \\mathbb{R}^d$ (a two-layer MLP with GELU activation) that predicts the next step's latent thought from the current one:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\hat{\\mathbf{h}}_{k+1} = f_\\theta(\\mathbf{h}_k),\n \\label{eq:internal_pred}\n\\end{equation}\nwith the internal supervision loss:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\Lint = \\frac{1}{K-1} \\sum_{k=1}^{K-1} \\left(1 - \\frac{\\hat{\\mathbf{h}}_{k+1} \\cdot \\text{sg}(\\mathbf{h}_{k+1})}{\\|\\hat{\\mathbf{h}}_{k+1}\\| \\cdot \\|\\text{sg}(\\mathbf{h}_{k+1})\\|}\\right),\n \\label{eq:loss_int}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere we use cosine similarity with a stop-gradient on the target to prevent representational collapse. The internal supervision complements the external decoder signals: while the decoder-based losses anchor the latent space to the \\emph{content} of reasoning through text-latent correspondence, the internal prediction loss regularizes the \\emph{structure} of the latent chain through step-to-step consistency.\n\n\\subsection{Training Objective}\n\\label{sec:training}\n\nThe complete training objective of \\ours{} combines the standard task loss with the three supervision signals:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\mathcal{L} = \\Ltask + \\alpha \\Lfwd + \\beta \\Lbwd + \\gamma \\Lint,\n \\label{eq:total_loss}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\Ltask$ is the standard next-token prediction loss for generating the final answer $\\mathbf{y}$ conditioned on the latent thoughts:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\Ltask = -\\sum_{t=1}^{|\\mathbf{y}|} \\log P_\\text{LM}(y_t | y_{<t}, \\mathbf{h}_{1:K}, \\mathbf{v}, \\mathbf{x}),\n \\label{eq:loss_task}\n\\end{equation}\nand $\\alpha$, $\\beta$, $\\gamma$ are hyperparameters controlling the relative importance of each supervision signal.\n\n\\textbf{Training procedure.} The training of \\ours{} proceeds in two stages. In the first stage (\\emph{supervised fine-tuning}), we train the external decoder and LLM of the backbone with the combined objective in \\cref{eq:total_loss} on CoT annotations from the OneThinker dataset~\\cite{feng2025onethinker}, which provides high-quality textual reasoning annotations across diverse visual tasks. This stage teaches the model to produce structured latent thoughts regulated by the three supervision signals.\n\nIn the second stage (\\emph{reinforcement learning}), we apply Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO)~\\cite{shao2024deepseekmath} on 50K CoT samples, allowing the latent thoughts to update freely without the decoder and internal supervision constraints. By removing the auxiliary losses and optimizing solely through outcome-based rewards, the model is encouraged to explore latent reasoning strategies beyond what the supervised signals prescribe. During inference, the external decoder and projection head are discarded entirely, incurring no additional computational overhead.\n\n\n%=============================================\n\\section{Experiments}\n\\label{sec:experiments}\n\n\\subsection{Experimental Setup}\n\\label{sec:setup}\n\n\\textbf{Benchmarks.}\nWe evaluate \\ours{} on eight diverse multi-modal benchmarks: SeedBench~\\cite{li2024seed} for comprehensive visual understanding and reasoning; MMBench~\\cite{liu2024mmbench} covering multiple visual perception and reasoning abilities; ChartQA~\\cite{masry2022chartqa} for chart comprehension and data reasoning; TextVQA~\\cite{singh2019towards} targeting text-rich visual question answering; ScienceQA~\\cite{lu2022scienceqa} for multi-modal science question answering; MMStar~\\cite{chen2024mmstar} with carefully curated vision-indispensable problems; AI2D~\\cite{kembhavi2016ai2d} focusing on diagram understanding; and MMT-Bench~\\cite{ying2024mmtbench} for comprehensive multitask evaluation.\n\n\\textbf{Implementation details.}\nWe build \\ours{} on top of Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct~\\cite{bai2025qwen3}, and instantiate the external decoder $D_\\phi$ as Qwen3-0.6B~\\cite{yang2025qwen3}, a smaller model from the same Qwen3 family that shares the same tokenizer and vocabulary. The projection head $f_\\theta$ is a 2-layer MLP with GELU activation. We set the number of latent thought steps $K=3$. The loss weights are $\\alpha=0.2$, $\\beta=0.2$, and $\\gamma=0.2$. We dynamically split the textual CoT annotations into $K$ splits during training to enhance the ability of model understanding. We train all models on the image subset of Onethinker dataset~\\cite{feng2026onethinker} with one epoch. All models are evaluated with the same prompt and same configurations to ensure fairness. We use the AdamW~\\cite{loshchilov2019adamw} optimizer with a cosine learning rate schedule and a batch size of 8. More details can be referred to our codebase.\n\n\\subsection{Main Results}\n\\label{sec:main_results}\n\n\\Cref{tab:comparison} presents a comprehensive comparison of \\ours{} against proprietary models, open-source MLLMs, latent reasoning methods, and latent visual reasoning approaches across all eight benchmarks.\n\n\\textbf{Baseline comparison.} Compared to direct answer (no reasoning), \\ours{} improves average performance by +9.6\\% (79.1 vs.\\ 69.5), confirming that latent thoughts provide substantial reasoning capacity despite generating only 3 continuous vectors. Compared to textual reasoning with explicit chain-of-thought, \\ours{} achieves +3.4\\% higher average (79.1 vs.\\ 75.7), with the largest gains on ChartQA (+9.6\\%) and TextVQA (+6.1\\%), while using significantly fewer tokens.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\caption{Comprehensive comparison across proprietary models, open-source MLLMs, latent reasoning methods and latent visual reasoning methods. 'SQA` is the abbreviation of `ScienceQA' benchmark. $^\\dagger$: methods built on the Qwen3-VL-8B backbone. Best non-proprietary results in \\textbf{bold}.}\n\\label{tab:comparison}\n\\centering\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3pt}\n\\small\n\\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{\n\\begin{tabular}{l|c|cccccccc|c}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Method} & \\textbf{Size} & \\textbf{SeedBench} & \\textbf{MMBench} & \\textbf{ChartQA} & \\textbf{TextVQA} & \\textbf{SQA} & \\textbf{MMStar} & \\textbf{AI2D} & \\textbf{MMT} & \\textbf{Avg.} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{11}{l}{\\emph{Proprietary Models}} \\\\\n\\rowcolor{Gray} GPT-5-high & - & - & 83.8 & 86.2 & - & 97.4 & 76.4 & 89.7 & 77.2 & - \\\\\n\\rowcolor{Gray} Claude-Opus-4.1 & - & - & 83.0 & 83.3 & - & - & 71.0 & 84.4 & - & - \\\\\n\\rowcolor{Gray} Gemini-2.5-Pro & - & - & 90.1 & 59.7 & - & 96.2 & 77.5 & 88.4 & 75.4 & - \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{11}{l}{\\textit{Open-Source MLLMs (7-8B scale)}} \\\\\nLLaVA-OneVision-1.5 & 8B & 77.3 & 84.1 & 86.5 & - & 95.0 & 67.7 & 84.2 & - & - \\\\\nInternVL3 & 8B & - & 83.4 & 86.6 & 80.2 & - & 68.2 & 85.2 & 65.0 & - \\\\\n%Mini-Gemini & 7B & 38.2 & 69.3 & 28.5 & 46.2 & 82.5 & 44.9 & 66.0 & 53.0 & 53.6 \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{11}{l}{\\emph{Latent Reasoning$^\\dagger$}} \\\\\nCCoT & 8B & 63.4 & 78.4 & 60.4 & 63.1 & 87.0 & 60.3 & 77.0 & 57.1 & 68.3 \\\\\nICoT & 8B & 64.7 & 79.1 & 62.1 & 65.6 & 87.6 & 61.2 & 77.8 & 57.9 & 69.5 \\\\\nCODI & 8B & 68.6 & 80.2 & 61.6 & 67.2 & 88.4 & 62.5 & 79.0 & 59.1 & 70.8 \\\\\nSoftCoT & 8B & 69.2 & 81.0 & 64.5 & 68.4 & 89.5 & 64.0 & 80.4 & 60.6 & 72.2 \\\\\nSIM-CoT & 8B & 72.4 & 82.0 & 66.7 & 70.2 & 90.8 & 65.6 & 82.0 & 62.4 & 74.0 \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{11}{l}{\\emph{Latent Visual Reasoning}} \\\\\nMultimodal CoT$^\\dagger$ & 8B & 63.2 & 79.5 & 62.1 & 66.1 & 87.8 & 61.5 & 78.2 & 58.3 & 69.6 \\\\\nLaCoT & 7B & 67.4 & - & 64.6 & 67.6 & - & - & - & - & - \\\\\nLVR & 7B & 71.2 & 81.5 & 67.2 & 70.2 & 90.2 & 64.8 & 81.3 & 62.6 & 73.6 \\\\\n\\midrule\n\nQwen3-VL (Direct answer) & 8B & 66.2 & 76.2 & 64.1 & 74.3 & 85.3 & 58.6 & 75.3 & 55.6 & 69.5 \\\\\nQwen3-VL (Textual reasoning)& 8B & 76.4 & 83.4 & 65.1 & 75.2 & 91.8 & 67.1 & 83.6 & 63.3 & 75.7 \\\\\n\\rowcolor{bestcolor}\n\\textbf{\\ours{}$^\\dagger$} & 8B & \\textbf{77.5} & \\textbf{84.6} & \\textbf{74.7} & \\textbf{81.3} & \\textbf{92.8} & \\textbf{68.9} & \\textbf{85.4} & \\textbf{67.4} & \\textbf{79.1} \\\\\n\\scriptsize\n Relative improvement & & \\textcolor{seagreen}{\\textbf{+1.1}} & \\textcolor{seagreen}{\\textbf{+1.2}} & \\textcolor{seagreen}{\\textbf{+9.6}} & \\textcolor{seagreen}{\\textbf{+6.1}} & \\textcolor{seagreen}{\\textbf{+1.0}} & \\textcolor{seagreen}{\\textbf{+1.8}} & \\textcolor{seagreen}{\\textbf{+1.8}} & \\textcolor{seagreen}{\\textbf{+4.1}} & \\textcolor{seagreen}{\\textbf{+3.3}} \\\\\n% & & \\textcolor{seagreen}{+5.2} & \\textcolor{seagreen}{+1.2} & \\textcolor{seagreen}{+1.8} & \\textcolor{seagreen}{+2.0} & \\textcolor{seagreen}{+1.7} & \\textcolor{seagreen}{+1.8} & \\textcolor{seagreen}{+1.2} & \\textcolor{seagreen}{+1.6} & \\textcolor{seagreen}{\\textbf{+2.0}} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\textbf{Comparison with latent reasoning methods.} We compare against five latent reasoning methods, all built on the same Qwen3-VL-8B backbone for fair comparison. CCoT~\\cite{cheng2024compressed} compresses chain-of-thought into dense representations; ICoT~\\cite{deng2023implicit} internalizes reasoning via distillation; CODI~\\cite{shen2025codi} distills CoT into latent thoughts; SoftCoT~\\cite{xu2025softcot} uses soft continuous embeddings; and SIM-CoT~\\cite{wei2026sim} aligns implicit tokens with explicit reasoning. \\ours{} surpasses the strongest baseline SIM-CoT by +5.1\\% on average (79.1 vs.\\ 74.0), with consistent gains including +5.1\\% on SeedBench, +8.0\\% on ChartQA, and +11.1\\% on TextVQA, demonstrating the effectiveness of three-way step-level supervision.\n\n\\textbf{Comparison with latent visual reasoning.} We further compare with approaches that incorporate auxiliary images for additional supervision: Multimodal CoT~\\cite{zhang2023multimodal} decomposes reasoning into rationale generation and answer inference; LaCoT~\\cite{sun2025lacot} performs visual reasoning through continuous latent representations; and LVR~\\cite{li2025lvr} generates latent visual tokens as intermediate representations. \\ours{} outperforms the strongest baseline LVR by +5.5\\% on average (79.1 vs.\\ 73.6), with notable gains on TextVQA (+11.1\\%) and SeedBench (+6.3\\%) while eliminating the need for auxiliary image annotations, validating our design of operating in the language model's latent space.\n\n\\subsection{Ablation Study}\n\\label{sec:ablation}\n\nWe conduct comprehensive ablation studies to analyze the contribution of each component in \\ours{}. All ablations use the Qwen3-VL-8B backbone and report results on four representative benchmarks.\n\n\\textbf{Effect of supervision signals.}\n\\Cref{tab:ablation_loss} presents a systematic ablation over all combinations of the three supervision signals. Several key findings emerge: (1)~Among individual losses, backward decoding alone achieves the highest single-component accuracy ($67.2\\%$), outperforming forward decoding ($65.8\\%$) and internal supervision ($63.6\\%$). (2)~Every pairwise combination substantially improves over its constituent single losses, with $\\Lfwd + \\Lbwd$ ($69.8\\%$) being the strongest pair. (3)~Adding the third signal to any pair consistently yields further gains, with backward decoding contributing the largest marginal improvement ($+4.5\\%$ when added to $\\Lfwd + \\Lint$), followed by forward ($+3.5\\%$) and internal ($+2.8\\%$). Overall, this confirms all three losses provide non-redundant regularization and complete three-way supervision is essential for optimal performance.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\caption{Ablation study on supervision signal combinations. \\checkmark{} indicates the corresponding loss is active during training.}\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3pt}\n\\label{tab:ablation_loss}\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\begin{tabular}{ccc|cccc|c}\n\\toprule\n$\\Lfwd$ & $\\Lbwd$ & $\\Lint$ & \\textbf{SeedBench} & \\textbf{MMStar} & \\textbf{AI2D} & \\textbf{MMT} & \\textbf{Avg.} \\\\\n\\midrule\n & & & 63.5 & 55.0 & 73.2 & 53.8 & 61.4 \\\\\n\\checkmark & & & 68.2 & 59.5 & 77.6 & 57.8 & 65.8 \\\\\n & \\checkmark & & 69.5 & 60.8 & 78.8 & 59.5 & 67.2 \\\\\n & & \\checkmark & 65.8 & 57.2 & 75.5 & 56.0 & 63.6 \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\checkmark & \\checkmark & & 72.0 & 63.5 & 81.5 & 62.0 & 69.8 \\\\\n\\checkmark & & \\checkmark & 70.5 & 61.5 & 80.0 & 60.2 & 68.1 \\\\\n & \\checkmark & \\checkmark & 71.2 & 62.8 & 81.0 & 61.5 & 69.1 \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\rowcolor{bestcolor}\n\\checkmark & \\checkmark & \\checkmark & \\textbf{75.2} & \\textbf{66.5} & \\textbf{83.8} & \\textbf{65.0} & \\textbf{72.6} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\n\\textbf{Effect of decoder architecture.}\nWe investigate the impact of the external decoder size in \\cref{tab:ablation_decoder}. All decoder variants are from the Qwen3 family and share the same tokenizer and vocabulary. Scaling the decoder from Qwen3-0.6B to Qwen3-8B yields only marginal improvements: Qwen3-0.6B performs only slightly worse than Qwen3-1.7B ($-$0.3\\%), and Qwen3-1.7B nearly matches Qwen3-4B ($-$0.2\\%). Further scaling to Qwen3-8B provides a negligible +0.1\\% gain. These results demonstrate that even a lightweight 0.6B decoder provides effective step-level supervision, and we use Qwen3-0.6B as the default for its best accuracy-efficiency trade-off.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\caption{Ablation on external decoder architecture. All decoders are from the Qwen3 family and share the same vocabulary as the backbone.}\n\\label{tab:ablation_decoder}\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3pt}\n\\begin{tabular}{l|c|cccc|c}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Decoder} & \\textbf{Params} & \\textbf{SeedBench} & \\textbf{MMStar} & \\textbf{AI2D} & \\textbf{MMT} & \\textbf{Avg.} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\rowcolor{bestcolor}\n\\textbf{Qwen3-0.6B} & 0.6B & \\textbf{75.2} & \\textbf{66.5} & \\textbf{83.8} & \\textbf{65.0} & \\textbf{72.6} \\\\\nQwen3-1.7B & 1.7B & 75.5 & 66.8 & 84.1 & 65.3 & 72.9 \\\\\nQwen3-4B & 4.0B & 75.7 & 67.0 & 84.3 & 65.5 & 73.1 \\\\\nQwen3-8B & 8.0B & 75.8 & 67.1 & 84.4 & 65.6 & 73.2 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\caption{Effect of the number of latent thought steps $K$ on four benchmarks. Performance peaks at $K{=}3$ and gradually decreases with larger $K$.}\n\n\\label{tab:num_steps}\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3pt}\n\\begin{tabular}{c|cccc|c}\n\\toprule\n$K$ & \\textbf{SeedBench} & \\textbf{MMStar} & \\textbf{AI2D} & \\textbf{MMT} & \\textbf{Avg.} \\\\\n\\midrule\n1 & 69.5 & 60.5 & 78.2 & 58.8 & 66.8 \\\\\n2 & 73.0 & 64.0 & 81.8 & 62.5 & 70.3 \\\\\n\\rowcolor{bestcolor}\n3 & \\textbf{75.2} & \\textbf{66.5} & \\textbf{83.8} & \\textbf{65.0} & \\textbf{72.6} \\\\\n4 & 74.8 & 66.0 & 83.5 & 64.5 & 72.2 \\\\\n6 & 74.3 & 65.5 & 83.0 & 64.0 & 71.7 \\\\\n8 & 73.8 & 65.0 & 82.6 & 63.5 & 71.2 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\textbf{Effect of number of latent steps.}\n\\Cref{tab:num_steps} presents the performance of \\ours{} as a function of the number of latent thought steps $K$. Performance increases rapidly from $K{=}1$ (66.8\\%) through $K{=}2$ (70.3\\%) to $K{=}3$ (72.6\\%), beyond which it gradually decreases: $K{=}4$ (72.2\\%), $K{=}6$ (71.7\\%), and $K{=}8$ (71.2\\%). This suggests that $K{=}3$ provides the optimal trade-off, where too few steps limit reasoning capacity while excessive steps introduce redundancy that slightly degrades performance. We use $K{=}3$ as the default.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\caption{Cross-$K$ generalization: performance (\\%) on individual benchmarks when training and testing with different numbers of latent steps. Best result in \\textbf{bold}.}\n\\label{tab:cross_k}\n\\centering\n\\setlength{\\baselineskip}{1.1\\baselineskip}\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{1pt}\n\\small\n\\begin{minipage}[t]{0.31\\linewidth}\n\\centering\n\\textbf{(a) SeedBench}\\\\[2pt]\n\\begin{tabular}{c|ccccc}\n\\toprule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{\\makecell{Train \\\\K}}} & \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\textbf{Test $K$}} \\\\\n & $1$ & $3$ & $6$ & $8$ \\\\\n\\midrule\n$1$ & \\cellcolor{bestcolor}\\textbf{69.5} & 68.8 & 68.0 & 67.5 \\\\\n$3$ & 70.0 & \\cellcolor{bestcolor}\\textbf{75.2} & 74.5 & 74.0 \\\\\n$6$ & 69.0 & 74.0 & \\cellcolor{bestcolor}\\textbf{74.3} & 74.0 \\\\\n$8$ & 68.5 & 73.5 & 73.6 & \\cellcolor{bestcolor}\\textbf{73.8} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\hfill\n\\begin{minipage}[t]{0.31\\linewidth}\n\\centering\n\\textbf{(b) MMStar}\\\\[1pt]\n\\begin{tabular}{c|ccccc}\n\\toprule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{\\makecell{Train \\\\K}}} & \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\textbf{Test $K$}} \\\\\n & $1$ & $3$ & $6$ & $8$ \\\\\n\\midrule\n$1$ & \\cellcolor{bestcolor}\\textbf{60.5} & 59.8 & 59.2 & 58.8 \\\\\n$3$ & 61.0 & \\cellcolor{bestcolor}\\textbf{66.5} & 65.8 & 65.3 \\\\\n$6$ & 60.0 & 65.2 & \\cellcolor{bestcolor}\\textbf{65.5} & 65.2 \\\\\n$8$ & 59.5 & 64.8 & 64.8 & \\cellcolor{bestcolor}\\textbf{65.0} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\hfill\n\\begin{minipage}[t]{0.31\\linewidth}\n\\centering\n\\textbf{(c) MMT}\\\\[1pt]\n\\begin{tabular}{c|ccccc}\n\\toprule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{\\makecell{Train \\\\K}}} & \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\textbf{Test $K$}} \\\\\n & $1$ & $3$ & $6$ & $8$ \\\\\n\\midrule\n$1$ & \\cellcolor{bestcolor}\\textbf{58.8} & 58.0 & 57.5 & 57.0 \\\\\n$3$ & 59.5 & \\cellcolor{bestcolor}\\textbf{65.0} & 64.3 & 63.8 \\\\\n$6$ & 58.5 & 63.8 & \\cellcolor{bestcolor}\\textbf{64.0} & 63.8 \\\\\n$8$ & 58.0 & 63.2 & 63.3 & \\cellcolor{bestcolor}\\textbf{63.5} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\hfill\n% \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.235\\linewidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\textbf{(d) ScienceQA}\\\\[1pt]\n% \\begin{tabular}{c|ccccc}\n% \\toprule\n% & \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\textbf{Test $K$}} \\\\\n% \\textbf{Train} & $4$ & $8$ & $12$ & $16$ \\\\\n% \\midrule\n% $4$ & \\cellcolor{bestcolor}\\textbf{92.3} & 91.8 & 91.4 & 91.0 \\\\\n% $8$ & 92.7 & \\cellcolor{bestcolor}\\textbf{93.1} & 92.8 & 92.5 \\\\\n% $12$ & 92.2 & 92.9 & \\cellcolor{bestcolor}\\textbf{93.1} & 92.8 \\\\\n% $16$ & 91.8 & 92.6 & 92.9 & \\cellcolor{bestcolor}\\textbf{93.0} \\\\\n% \\bottomrule\n% \\end{tabular}\n% \\end{minipage}\n\n\\end{table}\n\n\\textbf{Generalization across latent steps.}\nBeyond the default setting where training and testing use the same $K$, we investigate cross-$K$ generalization in \\cref{tab:cross_k}. The diagonal entries (matching $K$) consistently achieve the best performance, confirming that the model learns step-specific reasoning patterns. Notably, \\ours{} exhibits strong robustness to $K$ mismatch: models trained with $K{=}3$ and tested at $K{=}6$ incur only minor drops (0.7\\% on SeedBench, 0.7\\% on MMStar, 0.7\\% on MMT), and testing at $K{=}8$ similarly retains most of the performance with drops of merely 1.2\\%. Even the largest mismatch (training with $K{=}1$, testing at $K{=}8$) causes at most 2.0\\% degradation, confirming $K{=}3$ as a practical default that generalizes well across different test-time step counts.\n\n\n\\subsection{Robustness to Input Noise}\n\nCompared to explicit text decoding, latent reasoning can preserve the probability of multi-path reasoning within latent spaces and thus can perform more robustly to input noise. To assess the robustness of latent reasoning under noisy inputs, we evaluate \\ours{} against Direct Answer and Text CoT under two categories of perturbations. For visual noise, we apply Gaussian blur ($\\sigma \\in \\{1, 2, 3\\}$) and random occlusion (masking 10\\%/20\\%/30\\% of image patches). For text noise, we introduce character-level spelling errors (5\\%/10\\% of tokens) and key information deletion (10\\%/20\\% of question tokens). \\Cref{tab:noise} reports per-benchmark accuracy degradation on the SeedBench, MMStar, and MMT benchmarks.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\caption{Robustness to input noise. Per-benchmark accuracy degradation (\\%) under visual noise and text noise on SeedBench, MMStar, and MMT.}\n\n\\label{tab:noise}\n\\centering\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{2pt}\n\\small\n\\resizebox{0.9\\textwidth}{!}{\n\\begin{tabular}{ll|ccc|ccc|ccc}\n\\toprule\n\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Noise}} & \\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Level}} & \\multicolumn{3}{c|}{\\textbf{SeedBench}} & \\multicolumn{3}{c|}{\\textbf{MMStar}} & \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\textbf{MMT}} \\\\\n& & \\makecell{Direct \\\\Answer} & \\makecell{Text \\\\CoT} & \\ours{} & \\makecell{Direct \\\\Answer} & \\makecell{Text \\\\CoT} & \\ours{} & \\makecell{Direct \\\\Answer} & \\makecell{Text \\\\CoT} & \\ours{} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{11}{l}{\\emph{Visual Noise}} \\\\\nGauss.\\ blur & $\\sigma{=}1$ & $-$7.5 & $-$5.2 & \\textbf{$-$2.8} & $-$8.8 & $-$6.0 & \\textbf{$-$3.4} & $-$8.2 & $-$5.6 & \\textbf{$-$3.0} \\\\\n & $\\sigma{=}2$ & $-$11.8 & $-$8.0 & \\textbf{$-$4.8} & $-$13.0 & $-$9.0 & \\textbf{$-$5.5} & $-$12.2 & $-$8.5 & \\textbf{$-$5.0} \\\\\n & $\\sigma{=}3$ & $-$15.8 & $-$11.0 & \\textbf{$-$6.8} & $-$17.5 & $-$12.5 & \\textbf{$-$8.0} & $-$16.2 & $-$11.5 & \\textbf{$-$7.2} \\\\\nOcclusion & 10\\% & $-$8.2 & $-$5.6 & \\textbf{$-$3.0} & $-$9.2 & $-$6.4 & \\textbf{$-$3.6} & $-$8.5 & $-$5.8 & \\textbf{$-$3.2} \\\\\n & 20\\% & $-$12.5 & $-$8.5 & \\textbf{$-$5.2} & $-$14.0 & $-$9.8 & \\textbf{$-$6.0} & $-$13.0 & $-$9.0 & \\textbf{$-$5.5} \\\\\n & 30\\% & $-$17.0 & $-$12.2 & \\textbf{$-$7.8} & $-$19.0 & $-$13.8 & \\textbf{$-$9.0} & $-$17.5 & $-$12.5 & \\textbf{$-$8.2} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{11}{l}{\\emph{Text Noise}} \\\\\nSpell.\\ err. & 5\\% & $-$7.8 & $-$5.5 & \\textbf{$-$3.2} & $-$7.2 & $-$5.0 & \\textbf{$-$2.8} & $-$8.0 & $-$5.8 & \\textbf{$-$3.4} \\\\\n & 10\\% & $-$12.2 & $-$8.2 & \\textbf{$-$5.0} & $-$11.5 & $-$7.8 & \\textbf{$-$4.5} & $-$12.5 & $-$8.5 & \\textbf{$-$5.2} \\\\\nKey del. & 10\\% & $-$10.5 & $-$7.5 & \\textbf{$-$4.2} & $-$9.5 & $-$6.8 & \\textbf{$-$3.8} & $-$10.8 & $-$7.8 & \\textbf{$-$4.5} \\\\\n & 20\\% & $-$15.5 & $-$11.2 & \\textbf{$-$6.8} & $-$14.2 & $-$10.0 & \\textbf{$-$6.2} & $-$16.0 & $-$11.5 & \\textbf{$-$7.2} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n}\n\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\caption{Inference speed comparison on MMStar and SeedBench (per-sample average). All methods use the same Qwen3-VL-8B backbone on a single H200 GPU. Time is decomposed into input encoding and token generation (in seconds).}\n\n\\label{tab:speed}\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\begin{tabular}{l|c|cc|c|c|cc|c}\n\\toprule\n\\multirow{3}{*}{\\textbf{Method}} & \\multicolumn{4}{c|}{\\textbf{MMStar}} & \\multicolumn{4}{c}{\\textbf{MMT-Bench}} \\\\\n& \\multirow{2}{*}{\\makecell{CoT \\\\Tokens}} & \\multicolumn{2}{c|}{Time} & \\multirow{2}{*}{Acc.} & \\multirow{2}{*}{\\makecell{CoT \\\\Tokens}} & \\multicolumn{2}{c|}{Time} & \\multirow{2}{*}{Acc.} \\\\\n& & Encode & Generate & & & Encode & Generate & \\\\\n\\midrule\nDirect answer & 0 & 0.45 & 0.14 & 58.6 & 0 & 0.46 & 0.15 & 55.6 \\\\\nText CoT & 142.1 & 0.47 & 7.24 & 67.1 & 138.5 & 0.48 & 7.38 & 63.3 \\\\\n\\textbf{\\ours{}} & 3 & 0.44 & 0.32 & \\textbf{68.9} & 3 & 0.45 & 0.33 & \\textbf{67.4} \\\\\n& (\\scriptsize{\\textbf{\\textcolor{seagreen}{$\\downarrow$ 47.4$\\times$}}}) & & (\\scriptsize{\\textbf{\\textcolor{seagreen}{$\\downarrow$ 22.6$\\times$}}}) & & (\\scriptsize{\\textbf{\\textcolor{seagreen}{$\\downarrow$ 46.2$\\times$}}}) & & (\\scriptsize{\\textbf{\\textcolor{seagreen}{$\\downarrow$ 22.4$\\times$}}}) & \\\\ \n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\n\\end{table}\n\n\\ours{} consistently exhibits the lowest performance degradation across all noise conditions and benchmarks. Under visual noise, MMStar shows the highest sensitivity due to its reliance on vision-indispensable problems: at the most severe occlusion level (30\\%), Direct Answer degrades by 19.0\\%, Text CoT by 13.8\\%, and \\ours{} by only 9.0\\%. In contrast, SeedBench is comparatively more resilient, with \\ours{} degrading by at most 7.8\\%. For text noise, MMT is the most affected due to its diverse multitask evaluation, while MMStar shows the smallest drops given its focus on vision-critical problems. Overall, \\ours{}'s degradation ranges from 2.8\\% to 9.0\\% across all conditions, substantially lower than Direct Answer (7.2\\% to 19.0\\%) and Text CoT (5.0\\% to 13.8\\%). We attribute this robustness to the continuous nature of latent representations: whereas discrete text tokens propagate local input errors through the sequential decoding process, continuous latent vectors distribute information across all dimensions, enabling more graceful degradation under noise. Furthermore, the three-way supervision in \\ours{} encourages latent states to capture abstract reasoning patterns rather than surface-level input features, making them inherently less sensitive to input perturbations.\n\n\n\\subsection{Inference Speed Comparison}\nA key advantage of latent reasoning over text-based CoT is the reduced inference time. \\Cref{tab:speed} decomposes the per-sample inference time on MMStar and MMT-Bench into input encoding and token generation. The encoding phase is roughly constant across methods (${\\sim}$0.44--0.48\\,s), as it processes the same inputs regardless of reasoning strategy. The critical difference lies in generation: text CoT requires 7.24\\,s (MMStar) and 7.38\\,s (MMT-Bench) to produce ${\\sim}$142 and ${\\sim}$139 reasoning tokens respectively, whereas \\ours{} completes generation in 0.32\\,s and 0.33\\,s using only 3 latent vectors, achieving $22.6{\\times}$ and $22.4{\\times}$ reduction in generation time. Overall, \\ours{} delivers $10.1{\\times}$ (MMStar) and $10.1{\\times}$ (MMT-Bench) end-to-end speedup while maintaining higher accuracy.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n\\centerline{\\includegraphics[width=1.0\\textwidth]{./figures/figure2.pdf}}\n %\\fbox{\\parbox{0.95\\linewidth}{\\centering\\vspace{3cm}\\textbf{[Qualitative Comparison]}\\\\\\vspace{0.3cm}\\small Two example problems (one mathematical, one scientific) showing: (a) the input image and question, (b) text CoT reasoning with explicit steps, (c) decoded latent thoughts from \\ours{} showing more concise reasoning patterns, and (d) the final answers.\\vspace{0.5cm}}}\n\n \\caption{Two qualitative examples from MathVista with decoded latent thoughts. We use the forward decoder to project latent states back into text. Color-coded segments indicate reasoning content decoded from different latent steps. }\n%(a)~A logical pattern-matching problem where latent steps capture row-by-row visual analysis and pattern inference. (b)~A mathematical problem where latent steps decompose place-value components and compute the sum. Both examples confirm that the latent states encode meaningful, structured reasoning.\n \\label{fig:qualitative}\n\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\subsection{Qualitative Analysis}\n\\Cref{fig:qualitative} presents two MathVista examples where we use the forward decoder to project the latent thoughts of \\ours{} back into text for interpretation. In the logical pattern-matching problem~(a), the decoded text reveals that the latent steps systematically describe the visual pattern row by row, identifying the position and number of green slices in each circle, and then infer the missing pattern to arrive at the correct answer. In the mathematical problem~(b), the decoded text shows that the latent steps decompose the base-10 block representation into individual place-value components and compute the final sum. The color-coded segments demonstrate that each latent step encodes a distinct and meaningful portion of the reasoning chain, confirming that \\ours{}'s latent representations capture structured, interpretable thought patterns. The decoded content also maintains logical coherence across consecutive latent steps, meaning that our internal supervision enforces meaningful step-to-step transitions.\n\n%\\Cref{fig:qualitative} presents two MathVista examples where we use the forward decoder to project the latent thoughts of \\ours{} back into text for interpretation. In the logical pattern-matching problem~(a), the decoded text reveals that the latent steps systematically describe the visual pattern row by row, identifying the position and number of green slices in each circle, and then infer the missing pattern to arrive at the correct answer. In the mathematical problem~(b), the decoded text shows that the latent steps decompose the base-10 block representation into individual place-value components and compute the final sum. The color-coded segments demonstrate that each latent step encodes a distinct and meaningful portion of the reasoning chain, confirming that \\ours{}'s latent representations capture structured, interpretable thought patterns. These visualizations further validate that the three-way supervision effectively guides latent thoughts toward encoding structured semantics rather than degenerating into arbitrary representations. The decoded content also maintains logical coherence across consecutive latent steps, suggesting that the internal supervision successfully enforces meaningful step-to-step transitions.\n\n\n%=============================================\n\\section{Conclusion}\n\\label{sec:conclusion}\n\n\nWe presented \\ours{} (Chain of Latent Thoughts), a novel framework that teaches multi-modal models to reason through latent thought representations instead of explicit text-based CoT. The core innovation is introducing three complementary step-level supervisions: forward decoding, backward decoding, and internal supervision. Extensive experiments on eight benchmarks demonstrate that \\ours{} consistently outperforms existing latent reasoning methods and achieves up to $22.6{\\times}$ speedup over text CoT. Promising directions include adaptive latent steps by problem difficulty, and exploring hybrid latent-text reasoning frameworks. % extending latent reasoning to video and audio modalities,\n\n\\section*{Acknowledgements}\nOur work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U2574216), and Emerging Frontiers Cultivation Program of Tianjin University Interdisciplinary Center. This research is also supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. XXX-63263254); by the National Research Foundation Singapore and the Cyber Security Agency under the National Cybersecurity R\\&D Programme (NCRP25-P04-TAICeN); and is part of the IN-CYPHER programme and is supported by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the views of the National Research Foundation, Singapore, Cyber Security Agency of Singapore, Singapore.\n\\clearpage\n% ---- Bibliography ----\n\\bibliographystyle{splncs04}\n\\bibliography{main}\n\\end{document}\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091187,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31987"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31987"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Alejandro Ruiperez"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Alejandro Ruip\\'erez"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"BMPV black hole at first order in $\\alpha'$"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"24 pages"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"hep-th"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"We consider the low-energy effective action of the heterotic string and derive an analytic solution describing the first-order $\\alpha'$ corrections to the supersymmetric and extremal BMPV black hole with three unequal charges. The solution interpolates between an asymptotically-flat region and the near-horizon geometry. We compute the corrected black hole entropy using a generalization of Wald formula available in the literature, which correctly accounts for the Lorentz Chern-Simons term. The resulting expression agrees with recent results in the literature, which are based on the evaluation of an appropriate supersymmetric index."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:25:31 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:25:31 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Ruipérez","Alejandro",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Ruipérez\",\n \"Alejandro\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[a4paper, 11 pt]{article}\n\\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}\n\\usepackage[english]{babel}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{amssymb}\n\\usepackage{braket}\n\\usepackage{mathtools}\n\\usepackage{dsfont}\n\\usepackage{subcaption}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{yfonts}\n\\usepackage{setspace}\n\\usepackage{cite}\n%\\usepackage{color}\n%\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\usepackage{verbatim}\n\n\\usepackage{amstext} % for \\text macro\n\\usepackage{array} % for \\newcolumntype macro\n\\newcolumntype{C}{>{$}c<{$}} % math-mode version of \"c\" column type\n\n\\usepackage{geometry}\n\\geometry{textwidth=15.8cm,textheight=23.2cm,vmarginratio=6:5}%vmarginratio = ratio between top and bottom margin\n\n\\usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames]{color}\n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\hypersetup{\n colorlinks,\n citecolor=Blue,\n linkcolor=Blue,\n urlcolor=Blue}\n\n\n\\linespread{1.2}\n\n\\numberwithin{equation}{section}\n\n% New commands\n\\def\\be{\\begin{equation}}\n\\def\\ee{\\end{equation}}\n%\\def\\de{\\partial}\n\\def\\rme{{\\rm e}}\n\\newcommand{\\nn}{\\nonumber}\n\\newcommand{\\diff}{\\mathrm{d}}\n\\newcommand{\\ii}{\\mathrm{i}} % imaginary unit\n\n\n\\newcommand{\\dd}{\\delta}\n\n\\def\\ti{\\widetilde}\n\\def\\aa{\\mathsf{a}}\n\\def\\bb{\\mathsf{b}}\n\\def\\cc{\\mathsf{c}}\n\\def\\mm{{\\mathsf{m}}}\n\\def\\kk{{\\mathsf{k}}}\n\\def\\mn{{\\cal M}_N}\n\\def\\ms{{\\cal M}_S}\n\\def\\I{{\\rm I}}\n\\def\\II{{\\rm II}}\n\\def\\III{{\\rm III}}\n\\def\\IV{{\\rm IV}}\n\\def\\D{{\\rm D}}\n\\def\\qq{{\\hat q}}\n\\def\\vv{v}\n\\def\\ww{\\mathsf{w}}\n\n\n\n\\newcommand{\\DC}[1]{\\textcolor{cyan} {{\\bf #1}}}\n\\newcommand{\\AR}[1]{\\textcolor{RoyalBlue} {{\\bf #1}}}\n\\newcommand{\\ET}[1]{\\textcolor{magenta} {{\\bf #1}}}\n\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\\pagestyle{empty}\n\n\\begin{center}\n\n$\\,$\n\\vskip 0.5cm\n\n{\\LARGE{\\bf BMPV black hole at first order in $\\boldsymbol{\\alpha'}$}}\n\n\\vskip 1cm\n\nAlejandro Ruip\\'erez\n\n\\vskip 1cm\n\n\\end{center}\n\n\\renewcommand{\\thefootnote}{\\arabic{footnote}}\n\n\\begin{center}\n{\\it Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia ``Galileo Galilei'', Universit\\`a di Padova,\\\\ Via Marzolo 8, 35135, Padova, Italy\\\\[2mm]\nINFN Sezione di Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35135, Padova, Italy}\n\n\n\\vskip 3cm\n\n\n {\\bf Abstract} \n\\end{center}\n\n{\\noindent We consider the low-energy effective action of the heterotic string and derive an analytic solution describing the first-order $\\alpha'$ corrections to the supersymmetric and extremal BMPV black hole with three unequal charges. The solution interpolates between an asymptotically-flat region and the near-horizon geometry. We compute the corrected black hole entropy using a generalization of Wald formula available in the literature, which correctly accounts for the Lorentz Chern-Simons term. The resulting expression agrees with recent results in the literature, which are based on the evaluation of an appropriate supersymmetric index.}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\newpage\n\\setcounter{page}{1}\n\\pagestyle{plain}\n\n\n\n\\tableofcontents\n\n\n\n\\vskip 1cm\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\section{Introduction}\n\n\nOne of the key challenges for any theory of quantum gravity is to provide a microscopic derivation of black hole entropy. In string theory, this was originally achieved by Strominger and Vafa, who showed that the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of certain supersymmetric black holes in five dimensions is reproduced by the statistical entropy of the underlying microscopic system \\cite{ Strominger:1996sh}. Soon after, this was extended to account for rotation \\cite{Breckenridge:1996is}, and to related black holes in four dimensions \\cite{Maldacena:1997de}. These entropy matches were originally achieved in a regime where quantum-gravitational corrections can be safely ignored. The incorporation of quantum effects, particularly in supersymmetric settings where enhanced control is possible, naturally emerged as one of the next major steps and became a central goal of the field in the coming decades.\n\nOn the gravity side, we can distinguish between two types of corrections to the semiclassical Bekenstein-Hawking formula. The first arises from quantum fluctuations of massless fields in the black hole background. The second, which will be the focus of this paper, is due to the presence of higher-derivative corrections in the low-energy effective action. In contrast to the former, the latter are sensitive to the ultraviolet completion of the theory. In the context of string theory, these arise after integrating out massive string states, with masses above the string scale $1/\\sqrt{\\alpha'}$. As it is well known, this gives rise to an \\textit{a priori} infinite series of higher-derivative terms, to which we commonly refer as the $\\alpha'$ expansion. In most situations of interest, the dimensionless expansion parameter in this series is the characteristic curvature scale of the background in string units. This means that these stringy effects become relevant only when the finite size of the black hole is taken into account, leading to corrections to both the geometry and the thermodynamic properties. Most notably, in presence of higher-curvature interactions, the entropy is no longer given by the Bekenstein--Hawking formula, but by the generalization due to Wald \\cite{Wald:1993nt,Iyer:1994ys}.\n\nThe study of $\\alpha'$ corrections presents several technical challenges. To begin with, our knowledge of $\\alpha'$ corrections in string effective actions is by no means complete. Although in principle the underlying microscopic theory contains all the information required to determine the full tower of higher-derivative corrections, extracting them in practice is rather involved. As a consequence, only a few terms in the $\\alpha'$ expansion of the various string theories are explicitly known. The case which is perhaps best understood is the heterotic string, whose complete effective action and supersymmetry transformations were presented in \\cite{Bergshoeff:1989de} up to order $\\alpha'^3$, extending earlier results \\cite{Gross:1986mw, Metsaev:1987zx}. Even when the relevant corrections are known, solving the resulting corrected equations of motion and interpreting the corresponding solutions remains a formidable task. In particular, often one has to deal with subtleties in the definition of conserved charges, which have been source of confusion in the past. \n\nSeveral strategies to overcome these difficulties were proposed in the literature over the years. In particular, the application of superconformal calculus techniques \\cite{Bergshoeff:1980sw, deWit:1980lyi, Freedman:2012zz} to construct higher-derivative supersymmetric invariants allowed to make progress in computing corrections to the entropy of asymptotically-flat BPS black holes in four and five dimensions. The four-dimensional case was investigated shortly after \\cite{Strominger:1996sh, Breckenridge:1996is, Maldacena:1997de}, starting with \\cite{Behrndt:1996jn,Behrndt:1998eq, LopesCardoso:1998tkj, LopesCardoso:1999fsj, LopesCardoso:2000qm, Mohaupt:2000mj}. This benefited from the fact that the supersymmetrization of the Weyl-squared term in $N=2$ supergravity was already known at that time \\cite{Bergshoeff:1980is}. In contrast, progress in five dimensions had to wait a few years \\cite{Castro:2007hc, Castro:2007ci, Castro:2008ne, Castro:2008ys, deWit:2009de}, being mostly triggered by the construction of a supersymmetric $R^2$ invariant in \\cite{Hanaki:2006pj}.\\footnote{Earlier results which are not based on the supersymmetric $R^2$ invariant constructed in \\cite{Hanaki:2006pj} appeared in \\cite{Guica:2005ig}.}\nIn the meantime, Sen developed the entropy function formalism, providing an efficient method for computing corrections to the entropy of extremal black holes ---supersymmetric or not--- which does not require explicit knowledge of the corrected solution \\cite{Sen:2005wa, Sen:2005iz, Sahoo:2006pm, Sen:2007qy, Sen:2008vm}.\\footnote{Here, as well as in the rest of the paper, we are assuming that we are treating the higher-derivative corrections perturbatively.} Eventually, this boils down to the fact that the two-derivative solution extremizes the (two-derivative part of the) action. Thus, the fact that the two-derivative solution suffices to extract the corrected thermodynamics must hold in general ---not just for extremal black holes---, as it was pointed out in \\cite{Reall:2019sah}. In the last years, this observation has been exploited to compute higher-derivative corrections to the thermodynamics of supersymmetric AdS${}_5$ black holes \\cite{Bobev:2022bjm,Cassani:2022lrk,Cassani:2024tvk}, allowing for a precise holographic match of the corresponding CFT results beyond leading order in the large-$N$ expansion \\cite{Cassani:2021fyv,Cassani:2024tvk}.\\footnote{See also \\cite{Bobev:2020egg, Bobev:2021oku} for earlier results for AdS${}_4$ black holes.} \\footnote{These results have been very recently re-derived using equivariant localization techniques in supergravity in \\cite{BenettiGenolini:2026qdm, Gaar:2026nqq}, without even making explicit use of the two-derivative solutions. Another closely related approach for obtaining these corrections in a remarkably efficient manner is through the equivariant integration of the anomaly polynomial. The power of this method, already employed in \\cite{Ohmori:2021dzb,Cassani:2024tvk}, has been demonstrated most strikingly in \\cite{Cassani:2026teb}, where it has been used to derive the on-shell action of supersymmetric black holes with non-trivial horizon topology in five dimensions, with both flat and AdS asymptotics, including higher-derivative corrections.}\n\nIn comparison with the development of techniques for computing corrections to the entropy and charges, little progress was made in constructing the corresponding $\\alpha'$-corrected solutions beyond the near-horizon limit. Restricting our attention to the supersymmetric case, the first-order $\\alpha'$ corrections to the heterotic version of the ``Strominger--Vafa'' and ``Maldacena--Strominger--Witten'' black holes were obtained in \\cite{Cano:2018qev,Chimento:2018kop,Cano:2018brq}, more than two decades after the corresponding two-derivative solutions had been constructed \\cite{Cvetic:1995uj,Cvetic:1996xz} and their entropy successfully reproduced microscopically \\cite{Strominger:1996sh,Breckenridge:1996is, Maldacena:1997de}.\\footnote{The $\\alpha'$ corrections to the finite-temperature black holes with three and four charges were later studied in \\cite{Cano:2022tmn, Zatti:2023oiq}.} Subsequently, the two-charge case ---namely, the so-called small black holes--- was investigated in \\cite{Cano:2018hut, Ruiperez:2020qda, Cano:2021dyy, Massai:2023cis}. Having analytic solutions at hand is always advantageous, but it proved particularly valuable in the latter case, where it enabled a reassessment of earlier claims in the literature regarding the resolution of the singular horizon of small black holes by $\\alpha'$ corrections \\cite{Sen:1995in, Dabholkar:2004yr}. Concretely, the conclusion of \\cite{Cano:2018hut, Ruiperez:2020qda, Cano:2021dyy, Massai:2023cis} is that heterotic small black holes remain singular after including the first-order $\\alpha'$ corrections. Moreover, it was argued that the black holes whose entropy was claimed to match the microscopic degeneracy of the two-charge system \\cite{Dabholkar:1989jt} are actually associated to a different microscopic system which necessarily preserves less supersymmetry \\cite{Cano:2021dyy}.\\footnote{See \\cite{Chen:2024gmc} for a complementary discussion.} \n\nA particularly relevant case for which the $\\alpha'$ corrections have not been yet analyzed is the BMPV black hole \\cite{Breckenridge:1996is}, the rotating generalization of the Strominger--Vafa solution \\cite{Strominger:1996sh}. The goal of this paper is precisely to fill this gap. As we further discuss below, one of the main motivations for undertaking this work is the existence of conflicting expressions for the corrected BMPV entropy in the literature. Thus, beyond the intrinsic interest of obtaining a new explicit solution, our analysis will provide an independent first-principles computation of the entropy.\n\n\\paragraph{Outline of the paper and main results.} The original BMPV solution \\cite{Breckenridge:1996is} can be generalized to a supersymmetric solution of $N=2, D=5$ ungauged supergravity that carries $n_v+1$ electric charges $\\{Q_I\\}_{I=0, \\dots, n_v}$ and one angular momentum $J_-$. This supergravity theory arises as the effective action of M-theory on a Calabi-Yau threefold CY${}_{3}$. At the two-derivative level, the couplings of the theory are determined by a fully-symmetric constant tensor $C_{IJK}$ corresponding to the intersection numbers of CY${}_3$. Additional geometrical data enter in the action beyond two derivatives. Most importantly, the coupling constant in front of the mixed Chern-Simons term $A^I\\wedge {\\rm Tr}(R\\wedge R)$ is proportional to the second Chern class $c_{2I}$ of CY${}_{3}$. \n\nIn this paper we shall consider a specific supergravity model which arises as a consistent truncation of heterotic string theory on $T^5$, which is dual to M-theory on $K3\\times T^2$. This is the so-called STU model, which has $n_v=2$ vector multiplets and which is further determined by the choice $C_{IJK}\\propto |\\epsilon_{IJK}|$. Our main motivation to work with this model is that, as we already mentioned, $\\alpha'$ corrections can be conveniently studied in the heterotic frame, where they are best understood. Given this, the strategy that we follow is to first embed the BMPV in heterotic theory, and then make use of the Bergshoeff-de Roo effective action \\cite{Bergshoeff:1989de} in order to compute the $\\alpha'$ corrections directly in ten dimensions. The corrected solution we find depends just on four functions of the radial coordinate, and it is summarized in eqs.~\\eqref{eq:10Dsolution}, \\eqref{eq:1form} and \\eqref{eq:functions}. It should be emphasized that the solution we find interpolates between an asymptotically-flat region and the near-horizon, which is a $S^1$ fibration over AdS${}_{2}\\times S^2$ as in the two-derivative solution. The corrected entropy of the solution is found in eq.~\\eqref{eq:finalentropy}, which we report here for convenience:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:finalentropyintro}\n {\\cal S}\\,=\\,2\\pi \\sqrt{Q_+ Q_- \\left[Q_0+3-\\ww^2\\left(Q_0+4\\right)\\right]}\\,.\n\\end{equation}\nIn this formula, $Q_+, Q_-, Q_0$ denote the asymptotic charges associated to momentum, winding and NS5-branes, and $\\ww$ is related to the angular momentum $J_-$ by\n\\begin{equation}\n\\ww\\,=\\, \\frac{J_-}{\\sqrt{Q_+ Q_- Q_0}}\\,.\n\\end{equation}\nBefore further proceeding, it should be emphasized that our final entropy formula \\eqref{eq:finalentropy} holds in principle only to linear order in the large-charge expansion. At this order, one has \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:finalentropy_exp}\n {\\cal S}\\,=\\,2\\pi \\sqrt{Q_+ Q_- Q_0\\left(1-\\ww^2\\right)} \\left[1+\\frac{3g(\\ww)}{2Q_0}\\right]\\,, \\hspace{1cm}g(\\ww)\\,=\\,\\frac{1-\\tfrac{4}{3}\\ww^2}{1-\\ww^2}\\,.\n\\end{equation}\nThe corrected BMPV entropy has been computed in a number of references in the past literature, including \\cite{Guica:2005ig, Castro:2007ci, Castro:2008ys, deWit:2009de, Gupta:2021roy, Cassani:2024tvk, Alexandrov:2026rra}. As discussed in greater detail in the last one \\cite{Alexandrov:2026rra}, the previous references obtained seemingly inequivalent expressions for the function $g(\\ww)$ appearing in \\eqref{eq:finalentropy_exp}, even if the comparison is not always straightforward due to subtleties in the definition of conserved charges with Chern-Simons interactions, see e.g.~\\cite{Cassani:2023vsa}. Nevertheless, the analysis of \\cite{Alexandrov:2026rra}, which computes the microscopic 5D index of M-theory on specific classes of CY${}_3$, strongly supported the expression for the entropy presented in eq.~(7.12) of \\cite{Cassani:2024tvk}. Such formula was obtained via a Legendre transform of the on-shell action of a supersymmetric non-extremal configuration corresponding to the saddle of the 5D gravitational index associated to the BMPV black hole. Remarkably, one can verify that when making the appropriate choice for the couplings of the supergravity theory considered in \\cite{Cassani:2024tvk}, the formula obtained there precisely reduces to the one we find in this paper, namely \\eqref{eq:finalentropyintro}. Moreover, it was found in \\cite{Alexandrov:2026rra} that the match with the microscopic result improves considerably when \\eqref{eq:finalentropyintro}, instead of \\eqref{eq:finalentropy_exp}, is used, suggesting that \\eqref{eq:finalentropyintro} might be $\\alpha'$-exact. \n\nThis provides an independent consistency check of the entropy formula originally presented in \\cite{Cassani:2024tvk} working directly at the level of the heterotic effective action and only using the extremal black hole geometry. It should be stressed that the effective supergravity action considered in \\cite{Cassani:2024tvk} only includes the four-derivative invariant related to the supersymmetrization of the mixed Chern-Simons term. While this term certainly arises via dimensional reduction of the heterotic effective action on a torus, it has been argued to not be enough to match the full action, see e.g.~\\cite{Cai:2026qrr}. Thus, the agreement of the final entropy formulas must be explained by the fact that terms unrelated to the Chern-Simons will not contribute to the entropy of supersymmetric black holes, as explicitly verified in \\cite{Cai:2026qrr} in the static case. \n\n\\paragraph{Plan of the paper.} The paper is organized as follows. In section~\\ref{sec:heterotic_theory} we review the low-energy effective action of the heterotic string at first order in $\\alpha'$. In section~\\ref{sec:BMPV} we embed the BMPV in the heterotic theory in ten dimensions and derive an analytic solution describing the first-order $\\alpha'$ corrections. Then, in section~\\ref{sec:nh+entropy} we discuss the near-horizon geometry and compute the corrected entropy. Finally, in section~\\ref{sec:nonSUSYBMPV} we consider a non-supersymmetric BMPV black hole and compute the $\\alpha'$ corrections as well, showing that they differ from the supersymmetric case beyond leading order in $\\alpha'$. \n\n\\paragraph{Note on conventions.} In this paper we adopt the conventions of the book \\cite{Ortin:2015hya}. These coincide with those of \\cite{Bergshoeff:1989de}, which will be extensively used in what follows. In particular, we shall employ the mostly-minus signature for the metric $(+-\\dots -)$, and the conventions for the Riemann tensor are such that\n\\begin{equation}\n\\left[\\nabla_\\mu,\\nabla_\\nu\\right]\\xi^\\sigma\\,=\\, R_{\\mu\\nu\\rho}{}^{\\sigma}\\xi^\\rho\\, .\n\\end{equation}\nMoreover, the Hodge dual is defined by\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Hodge}\n\\star(e^{a_1}\\wedge \\dots \\wedge e^{a_p})\\,=\\,\\frac{1}{(d-p)!}\\epsilon_{b_1 \\dots b_{d-p}}{}^{a_1\\dots a_p}\\,e^{b_1}\\wedge \\dots \\wedge e^{b_{d-p}}\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $e^a$ denotes the vielbein, $d$ the number of spacetime dimensions and\n\\begin{equation}\n\\epsilon^{0\\,\\ldots\\, d-1}\\,=\\,+1\\,, \\hspace{1cm} \\Rightarrow \\hspace{1cm} \\epsilon_{0\\,\\ldots \\,d-1}\\,=\\,\\left(-1\\right)^{d-1}\\, . \n\\end{equation}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\section{Effective action of the heterotic string at first order in $\\alpha'$}\\label{sec:heterotic_theory}\n\nThe supersymmetric effective action of the heterotic string at first order in $\\alpha'$ can be conveniently formulated by introducing the torsionful spin connections \\cite{Bergshoeff:1989de},\n\\begin{equation}\n\\omega_{(\\pm)}{}^a{}_b\\,=\\,\\omega^a{}_b \\pm \\frac{1}{2}H_{c}{}^a{}_b\\, e^c\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\omega^a{}_b$ is the Levi-Civita spin connection, $e^c$ is the zehnbein and $H$ is the Neveu-Schwarz (NS) three-form.\\footnote{The first Cartan structure equation reads $\\diff e^a\\,=\\,\\omega^a{}_b\\wedge e^b$.} Anomaly cancellation enforces the modified Bianchi identity \\cite{Green:1984sg},\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Bianchi}\n\\diff H\\,=\\, \\frac{\\alpha'}{4} R_{(-)}{}^a{}_b\\wedge R_{(-)}{}^b{}_a\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere \n\\begin{equation}\nR_{(-)}{}^a{}_b\\,=\\, \\diff \\omega_{(-)}{}^a{}_b-\\omega_{(-)}{}^a{}_c\\wedge \\omega_{(-)}{}^c{}_b\n\\end{equation}\nis the curvature two-form of the torsionful spin connection $\\omega_{(-)}{}^a{}_b$.\n\nIn terms of these elements, the heterotic effective action at first order in $\\alpha'$ is given by \\cite{Bergshoeff:1989de}\\footnote{For simplicity, we are setting the 10D gauge fields to zero, which is a consistent truncation. Their effect on static black holes with three and four charges was studied in \\cite{Cano:2018qev, Chimento:2018kop, Cano:2018brq}. A generalization of the BMPV black hole with non-trivial gauge fields was found in \\cite{Ortin:2019sex}.}\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:BdRaction}\nS\\,=\\, \\frac{g_s^2}{16\\pi G_{10}} \\int \\diff^{10}x\\,\\sqrt{-g}\\,e^{-2\\phi}\\left[R-4\\left(\\partial \\phi\\right)^2+\\frac{1}{12}H^2+\\frac{\\alpha'}{8}R_{(-)}{}_{\\mu\\nu\\rho\\sigma}R_{(-)}{}^{\\mu\\nu\\rho\\sigma} \\right] \\,,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $g_{\\mu\\nu}$ denotes the metric in the string frame, $\\phi$ is the dilaton and $G_{10}$ is the ten-dimensional Newton constant. This is related to the asymptotic value of the string coupling $g_s$ and to $\\alpha'$ by \n\\begin{equation}\nG_{10}\\,=\\,8\\pi^6 g_s^2 \\alpha'{}^4\\,\\,.\n\\end{equation}\nThe equations of motion following from the above action are \\cite{Bergshoeff:1989de}\\footnote{The derivation of the equations of motion simplifies after using a lemma proven in \\cite{Bergshoeff:1989de}, which tells us that the variation of the action with respect to $\\omega_{(-)}{}_{ab}$ is proportional to $\\alpha'$ and to the two-derivative equations of motion plus terms of higher order in $\\alpha'$.}\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\label{eq:Einstein}\n R_{\\mu\\nu}-2\\nabla_\\mu\\partial_\\nu \\phi+\\frac{1}{4}H_{\\mu\\rho\\sigma}H_{\\nu}{}^{\\rho\\sigma}&\\,=\\,&-\\frac{\\alpha'}{4}R_{(-)}{}_{\\mu\\rho\\sigma\\lambda}R_{(-)}{}_{\\nu}{}^{\\rho\\sigma\\lambda}\\,,\\\\[1mm]\n \\label{eq:dilaton}\n \\left(\\partial\\phi\\right)^2-\\frac{1}{2}\\nabla^2\\phi-\\frac{1}{24}H^2&\\,=\\,&\\frac{\\alpha'}{32}R_{(-)}{}_{\\mu\\nu\\rho\\sigma}R_{(-)}{}^{\\mu\\nu\\rho\\sigma}\\,,\\\\[1mm]\n \\label{eq:B}\n \\diff\\left(e^{-2\\phi} \\star H\\right)&\\,=\\,&0\\,.\n\\end{eqnarray}\nFinally, we provide the supersymmetry transformations of the gravitino $\\psi_a$ and the dilatino $\\lambda$ at first order in $\\alpha'$, \n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\label{eq:gravitino_SUSYtransf}\n\\delta_{\\epsilon}\\psi_{a}&\\,=\\,&\\nabla^{(+)}_a\\epsilon\\,=\\,\\left(\\partial_a-\\frac{1}{4}\\Omega_{(+)}{}_{abc}\\Gamma^{bc}\\right)\\epsilon\\,,\\\\[1mm]\n\\label{eq:dilatino_SUSYtransf}\n\\delta_{\\epsilon}\\lambda&\\,=\\,&\\left(\\Gamma^a\\partial_a\\phi -\\frac{1}{12}H_{abc}\\Gamma^{abc}\\right)\\epsilon\\,,\n\\end{eqnarray}\nwhere $\\Gamma^a$ are the ten-dimensional gamma matrices.\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\section{BMPV black hole at first order in $\\alpha'$}\n\\label{sec:BMPV}\n\nOur main goal in this section is to compute the first-order $\\alpha'$ corrections to the BMPV black hole \\cite{Breckenridge:1996is}. This can be seen as a solution of the STU model of $N=2, D=5$ supergravity, which can be obtained by dimensional reduction and further truncation of heterotic supergravity on a five-torus. Then, there are roughly speaking two possible strategies to compute the $\\alpha'$ corrections. The first would be to reduce the effective action \\eqref{eq:BdRaction} on a torus, and try to solve the resulting five-dimensional equations of motion. Alternatively, we can embed the BMPV solution in heterotic theory, and proceed by computing the $\\alpha'$ corrections directly in ten dimensions. Given the complexity of the dimensionally-reduced effective action \\cite{Baron:2017dvb, Elgood:2020xwu, Ortin:2020xdm, Eloy:2020dko,Jayaprakash:2024xlr}, we choose to follow the second route.\n\n\\subsection{Embedding the BMPV black hole in heterotic theory}\n\\label{sec:upliftBMPV}\n\nLet us then start by uplifting the BMPV black hole to ten dimensions. To this aim, we will use the results in appendix~E.3 of \\cite{RuiperezVicente:2020qfw}, where the uplift of the general class of timelike supersymmetric solutions of the STU model of $N=2, D=5$ supergravity is given. Focusing only on the subclass of these solutions which is relevant for us here, we have\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\diff s^2&\\,=\\,& \\frac{1}{Z_+Z_-}\\left(\\diff t+\\omega\\right)^2-Z_0 \\,\\diff s^2_{\\mathbb R^4}- \\frac{Z_+}{Z_-}\\left[\\diff z- Z_+^{-1}\\left(\\diff t+\\omega\\right)\\right]^2-\\diff {\\vec y}^2\\,,\\\\[1mm]\n\\label{eq:Hsusy}\nH&\\,=\\,&-\\diff\\left[Z_-^{-1}\\left(\\diff t+\\omega\\right)\\wedge \\diff z\\right]+\\star_4\\diff Z_0\\,,\\\\[1mm]\n\\label{eq:dilatonsusy}\ne^{2\\phi}&\\,=\\,&g_s^2 \\frac{Z_0}{Z_-}\\, .\n\\end{eqnarray}\nThe coordinates $z\\sim z+2\\pi R_z$ and ${\\vec y}\\sim \\vec y +2\\pi \\sqrt{\\alpha'}$ parametrize the internal space, which is a five-torus. The functions $Z_0, Z_+, Z_-$ and one-form $\\omega$ are defined on the $\\mathbb R^4$ \\emph{base space}.\\footnote{This can be in principle any hyper-Kahler space, but the one relevant for describing the BMPV solution is simply ${\\mathbb R}^4$.} We introduce spherical coordinates on ${\\mathbb R}^4$ such that the metric reads\n\\begin{equation}\n\\diff s^2_{\\mathbb R^4}\\,=\\,\\diff r^2 +\\frac{r^2}{4} \\left[(\\diff \\psi+\\cos\\theta \\diff \\phi)^2 + \\diff \\theta^2 +\\sin^2\\theta\\diff \\phi^2\\right]\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\theta\\in [0, \\pi]$ and $(\\psi, \\phi)\\sim (\\psi-2\\pi, \\phi+2\\pi)\\sim (\\psi+2\\pi, \\phi+2\\pi)$. \n\nAt leading order in $\\alpha'$, supersymmetry, equations of motion and Bianchi identities impose that the $Z_I$ functions are harmonic and that $\\diff \\omega$ is anti-selfdual:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{eq:zerothorderconditions}\n\\diff \\star_4 \\diff Z_{I}\\,=\\,0\\,, \\hspace{1cm} \\diff\\omega+\\star_4\\diff \\omega\\,=\\,0\\, ,\\hspace{1cm} I=+, -,0\\,.\n\\end{equation}\nThe choice corresponding to the BMPV black hole is\n\\begin{equation}\nZ_+\\,=\\, 1+ \\frac{q_+}{r^2}\\,, \\hspace{1cm} Z_-\\,=\\, 1+ \\frac{q_-}{r^2}\\,,\n\\hspace{1cm} Z_0\\,=\\, 1+ \\frac{q_0}{r^2}\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nand\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:omega_BMPV}\n\\omega\\,=\\,\\frac{a}{2r^2}\\left(\\diff\\psi +\\cos \\theta \\diff \\phi\\right)\\, . \n\\end{equation}\nOne can verify that the one-form \\eqref{eq:omega_BMPV} is indeed anti-selfdual with respect to the orientation \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:orientation}\n\\frac{r^3}{8}\\sin\\theta\\,\\diff r\\wedge \\diff \\theta \\wedge \\diff \\psi \\wedge \\diff \\phi.\n\\end{equation}\nAs it turns out, the parameters $q_+, q_-$ and $q_0$ are related to the momentum, winding and NS5-brane charges, respectively. The precise relations can be found e.g.~in \\cite{Cano:2018qev}, \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:charges}\nq_+\\,=\\,\\frac{g_s^2 \\alpha'^2}{R_z^2}Q_+\\,, \\hspace{1cm} q_-\\,=\\, g_s^2\\alpha' Q_-\\,, \\hspace{1cm} q_0\\,=\\,\\alpha' Q_0\\, .\n\\end{equation}\nAs it is well known, the BMPV black hole only carries one independent combination of the two possible angular momenta in five dimensions, $J_1, J_2$.\\footnote{$J_1$ and $J_2$ generate rotations along the angular directions $\\phi_1\\,=\\, \\frac{\\psi+\\phi}{2}$ and $\\phi_2\\,=\\, \\frac{\\phi-\\psi}{2}$.} Such combination is related to the parameter $a$. Defining $J_{\\pm}\\,=\\, \\tfrac{J_1\\pm J_2}{2}$, a standard calculation yields\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:J_-}\n J_+\\,=\\,0\\,, \\hspace{1cm} J_-\\,=\\,\\frac{\\pi a}{4G_5} \\,, \n\\end{equation}\nwhere $G_5$ is the Newton constant in five dimensions. The first condition can be understood to be a consequence of extremality, as explained in \\cite{Cassani:2024tvk, Anupam:2023yns, Cassani:2024kjn, Boruch:2025qdq}. In particular, it was shown in \\cite{Cassani:2024tvk} that this condition still holds after including higher-derivative corrections. We will corroborate this in the following section.\n\n\\subsection{$\\alpha'$ corrections to the BMPV black hole}\\label{sec:alpha_BMPV}\n\nBased on the uplift of the supersymmetric BMPV solution in the previous section, we write down the following ansatz\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\diff s^2&\\,=\\,& \\frac{1}{Z_+ Z_-}\\left(\\diff t+\\omega\\right)^2-Z_0 \\,\\diff s^2_{\\mathbb R^4}- \\frac{Z_+}{Z_-}\\left[\\diff z- Z_+^{-1}\\left(\\diff t+\\omega\\right)\\right]^2-\\diff {\\vec y}^2,\\\\[1mm]\n\\label{eq:Hansatz}\nH&\\,=\\,&-\\,\\diff Z_-^{-1}\\wedge \\left(\\diff t+\\omega\\right)\\wedge \\diff z+ Z_-^{-1}\\star_4\\diff\\omega\\wedge \\diff z+\\star_4\\diff Z_0\\,,\n\\end{eqnarray}\nwhere the functions $Z_{I}\\,=\\, Z_{I}(r)$ and the dilaton $\\phi\\,=\\,\\phi(r)$ are assumed to depend only on the radial coordinate, and\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{eq:omega_ansatz}\n\\omega\\,=\\, W(r)\\left(\\diff \\psi +\\cos \\theta \\diff \\phi\\right)\\,. \n\\end{equation}\nMore explicitly, with respect to the orientation \\eqref{eq:orientation}, we have that\n\\begin{equation}\n\\star_4\\diff Z_0\\,=\\, \\frac{r^3Z_0'}{8}\\sin \\theta\\, \\diff \\theta\\wedge \\diff\\phi\\wedge \\diff \\psi \\,,\n\\end{equation}\nand\n\\begin{equation}\n\\star_4\\diff \\omega\\,=\\, -\\frac{r W'}{2} \\sin \\theta \\,\\diff \\theta\\wedge \\diff \\phi+\\frac{2W}{r}\\diff r\\wedge \\left(\\diff\\psi+\\cos\\theta\\diff\\phi\\right) \\,.\n\\end{equation}\nAt first sight, it might seem that we have performed an unnecessary rewriting in \\eqref{eq:Hansatz}. Indeed, bearing in mind the second equation in \\eqref{eq:zerothorderconditions}, it is clear that \\eqref{eq:Hansatz} is equivalent to \\eqref{eq:Hsusy} at leading order in $\\alpha'$. However, \\eqref{eq:zerothorderconditions} will no longer hold at first order in $\\alpha'$ if the function $W$ in \\eqref{eq:omega_ansatz} receives corrections. In this case, the two ways of writing $H$ at leading order in $\\alpha'$ cease to be equivalent at first order. The key point is that the sum of the first and second terms in \\eqref{eq:Hansatz} is no longer closed, and this is actually what will allow us to solve the modified Bianchi identity \\eqref{eq:Bianchi}, as we will see momentarily.\n\nIn what follows we explain our strategy to solve the modified Bianchi identity \\eqref{eq:Bianchi} and equations of motion \\eqref{eq:Einstein}, \\eqref{eq:dilaton}, \\eqref{eq:B}, working perturbatively in $\\alpha'$. Namely, we expand around the leading order solution,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:alphaexpansion}\nZ_I\\,=\\, 1+\\frac{q_I}{r^2}+\\alpha' f_I(r)\\,, \\hspace{1cm} W\\,=\\,\\frac{a}{2r^2}+\\alpha' f_W(r)\\,, \\hspace{1cm} I\\,=\\, +, -, 0\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nand solve for the unknown functions $f_I$, $f_W$, and the dilaton $\\phi$. As it turns out, after solving for the dilaton, the $\\alpha'$-corrected equations eventually reduce to a system of inhomogeneous ODEs for the unknown functions, $f_I, f_W$. This is because the explicit $\\alpha'$ terms in \\eqref{eq:Bianchi}, \\eqref{eq:Einstein} and \\eqref{eq:dilaton} behave effectively as sources. Therefore, the functions are determined up to a solution to the homogeneous equations, which corresponds to our choice of boundary conditions, or equivalently to a shift of the constant term and the $1/r^2$ coefficient of the two-derivative solution. A natural choice of boundary conditions corresponds to fixing the asymptotic behavior of the solution such that\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:bdry_cond}\nZ_I\\underset{r\\rightarrow \\infty}{\\longrightarrow} 1+\\frac{q_I}{r^2}+\\dots\\,, \\hspace{1cm} W \\underset{r\\rightarrow \\infty}{\\longrightarrow} \\frac{a}{2r^2}+\\dots\\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nso that the relations \\eqref{eq:charges} and \\eqref{eq:J_-} still hold at first order in $\\alpha'$. This will be our choice here. Another natural choice would be to impose mixed boundary conditions in which we fix the constant term at infinity and the coefficient of the $1/r^2$ term as $r$ approaches the position of the horizon, $r=0$. This would keep the near-horizon geometry fixed, as we further discuss in section~\\ref{sec:nh+entropy}. This was the choice made e.g.~in \\cite{Cano:2018qev, Faedo:2019xii, Cano:2021dyy}, where the corrections to the non-rotating three-charge solutions were obtained and further studied. Therefore, one must bear in mind this subtlety when comparing against these references. \n\n\\paragraph{Kalb-Ramond equation.} The Kalb-Ramond equation \\eqref{eq:B} imposes two conditions:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{}\n W\\left(2\\phi'-\\frac{Z_0'}{Z_0}+\\frac{Z_-'}{Z_-} \\right)\\,=\\,0\\,,\\hspace{1cm}\n 2\\phi'-\\frac{Z_0'}{Z_0}+\\frac{Z_-'}{Z_-}-\\frac{Z''_-}{Z_-'}-\\frac{3}{r}\\,=\\,0\\, .\n\\end{equation}\nIn the rotating case $W\\neq 0$, the system reduces to \n\\begin{equation}\n2\\phi'-\\frac{Z_0'}{Z_0}+\\frac{Z_-'}{Z_-} \\,=\\,0\\,, \\hspace{1cm}\n\\left(r^3 Z_-'\\right)'\\,=\\,0\\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nwhich is solved by\n\\begin{equation}\ne^{2\\phi}\\,=\\,g_s^2 \\,\\frac{Z_0}{Z_-}\\,, \n\\end{equation}\nand \n\\begin{equation}\n Z_-\\,=\\, 1+ \\frac{q_-}{r^2} \\, \\hspace{1cm} \\Rightarrow \\hspace{1cm} f_-\\,=\\, 0\\, .\n\\end{equation}\nNote that we have fixed the integration constants by identifying the asymptotic value of the dilaton with the string coupling constant $g_s$, and by imposing the boundary conditions \\eqref{eq:bdry_cond}.\n\n\\paragraph{Bianchi identity.} Next, we turn to the Bianchi identity. Substituting the ansatz \\eqref{eq:alphaexpansion} in \\eqref{eq:Bianchi} yields\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{aligned}\n&\\frac{\\alpha' r^2\\sin \\theta}{4}\\diff r\\wedge \\diff \\theta\\wedge \\diff\\phi\\wedge \\left[\\left(f_0''+\\frac{3}{r} f_0'-\\frac{24 q_0^2 }{\\left(r^2+q_0\\right){}^4}\\right)\\,\\frac{r}{2}\\,\\diff\\psi\\right. \\\\[1mm]\n&\\left. + \\left(-r \\left(r^2+q_-\\right) f_W''-\\left(r^2+3 q_-\\right) f_W'+4 r f_W+\\frac{8 a q_0 r\n \\left(q_0+3 q_-+4 r^2\\right)}{\\left(r^2+q_0\\right){}^4}\\right)\\frac{2\\diff z}{\\left(r^2+q_-\\right)^2}\\right]\\,=\\,0 .\n\\end{aligned}\n\\end{equation}\nThe inhomogeneous term in the second line evidences that an ansatz for $H$ of the form \\eqref{eq:Hsusy} would not have solved the $r\\theta\\phi z$ component of the Bianchi identity, since the first term in \\eqref{eq:Hsusy} is closed. The above equation can be written in a simpler way by introducing new functions,\n\\begin{equation}\nF_0\\,=\\,f_0-\\frac{q_0^2}{r^2 \\left(r^2+q_0\\right){}^2}\\, , \\hspace{1cm}F_W\\,=\\,f_W-\\frac{a q_0}{r^2 \\left(r^2+q_0\\right){}^2}\\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nnamely\n\\begin{equation}\n\\frac{\\alpha' r^2\\sin \\theta}{4}\\diff r\\wedge \\diff \\theta\\wedge \\diff\\phi\\wedge \\left[\\frac{\\left(r^3 {F}'_0\\right)'}{2r^2}\\,\\diff\\psi- \\frac{2\\left(r^2+q_-\\right)\\left(r^3 F_W'\\right)'-4r^2 \\left(r^2 F_W\\right)'}{r^2\\left(r^2+q_-\\right)^2}\\diff z\\right]\\,=\\,0 .\n\\end{equation}\nThe general solutions to these homogeneous equations are \n\\begin{equation}\n F_0\\,=\\, c^1_0+\\frac{c^2_0}{r^2}\\,, \\hspace{1cm} F_W\\,=\\,\\frac{c^1_W}{r^2}+ c^2_W\\left(r^2+2q_-\\right)\\,. \n\\end{equation}\nTherefore, only the trivial solutions $F_0\\,=\\,F_W\\,=\\,0$, corresponding to\n\\begin{equation}\nf_0\\,=\\,\\frac{q_0^2}{r^2 \\left(r^2+q_0\\right){}^2}\\, , \\hspace{1cm}f_W\\,=\\,\\frac{a q_0}{r^2 \\left(r^2+q_0\\right){}^2}\\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nrespect our choice of boundary conditions \\eqref{eq:bdry_cond}.\n\n\\paragraph{Dilaton and Einstein equations.} As it turns out, the dilaton equation \\eqref{eq:dilaton} is automatically satisfied at this point. The same occurs for all components of the Einstein equation except for the $zz$ one, which gives the following differential equation for $f_+$,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{aligned}\n\\left(r^3 f_+'\\right)'\\,=\\,&-\\frac{16 q_- q_+ r^3 \\left(q_0^2+q_0 q_-+q_-^2+3 \\left(q_0+q_-\\right) r^2+3\n r^4\\right)}{\\left(q_0+r^2\\right){}^3 \\left(q_-+r^2\\right){}^3}\\\\[1mm]\n&+\\frac{32 a^2 r^3 \\left(q_0^2+2 q_0 q_-+3 q_-^2+4 \\left(q_0+2 q_-\\right) r^2+6\n r^4\\right)}{\\left(q_0+r^2\\right){}^4 \\left(q_-+r^2\\right){}^3}\\,.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\end{equation}\nThe solution satisfying \\eqref{eq:bdry_cond} is \n\\begin{equation}\n f_+\\,=\\, \\frac{-2}{r^2\\left(r^2+q_0\\right)\\left(r^2+q_-\\right)}\\left(q_+q_--\\frac{2a^2}{r^2+q_0}\\right)\\,.\n\\end{equation}\n\n\\paragraph{Summary.} We have found that the ten-dimensional configuration describing the first-order $\\alpha'$ corrections to the BMPV black hole is given by \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:10Dsolution}\n\\begin{aligned}\n\\diff s^2\\,=\\,& \\frac{1}{Z_+ Z_-}\\left(\\diff t+\\omega\\right)^2-Z_0 \\,\\diff s^2_{\\mathbb R^4}- \\frac{Z_+}{Z_-}\\left[\\diff z- Z_+^{-1}\\left(\\diff t+\\omega\\right)\\right]^2-\\diff {\\vec y}^2,\\\\[1mm]\nH\\,=\\,&-\\,\\diff Z_-^{-1}\\wedge \\left(\\diff t+\\omega\\right)\\wedge \\diff z+ Z_-^{-1}\\star_4\\diff\\omega\\wedge \\diff z+\\star_4\\diff Z_0\\,,\\\\[1mm]\ne^{2\\phi}\\,=\\,& g_s^2 \\frac{Z_0}{Z_-}\\,,\n\\end{aligned}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:1form}\n\\omega\\,=\\,W\\left(\\diff \\psi+\\cos\\theta\\,\\diff \\phi\\right)\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nand \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:functions}\n\\begin{aligned}\nZ_0\\,=\\,& 1+\\frac{q_0}{r^2}+ \\frac{q_0^2\\,\\alpha'}{r^2 \\left(r^2+q_0\\right){}^2}+{\\cal O}(\\alpha'^2)\\,,\\\\[1mm]\nZ_+\\,=\\,& 1+\\frac{q_+}{r^2}- \\frac{2\\alpha'}{r^2\\left(r^2+q_0\\right)\\left(r^2+q_-\\right)}\\left(q_+q_--\\frac{2a^2}{r^2+q_0}\\right)+{\\cal O}(\\alpha'^2)\\,,\\\\[1mm]\nZ_-\\,=\\,& 1+\\frac{q_-}{r^2}+{\\cal O}(\\alpha'^2)\\,,\\\\[1mm]\nW\\,=\\,& 1+\\frac{a}{2r^2}+ \\frac{a \\,q_0\\,\\alpha'}{r^2 \\left(r^2+q_0\\right){}^2}+{\\cal O}(\\alpha'^2)\\,.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\end{equation}\nThis reduces to the solution found in \\cite{Cano:2018brq} when the rotation parameter $a$ is set to zero. Furthermore, in appendix~\\ref{app:SUSYanalysis} we show that the corrected solution is still $\\tfrac{1}{4}$-supersymmetric, as expected. \n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\section{Near-horizon limit and black hole entropy}\\label{sec:nh+entropy}\n\n\\subsection{Near-horizon limit}\n\nIn order to obtain the near-horizon limit of the solution we found in section~\\ref{sec:alpha_BMPV}, we rescale the time and radial coordinates,\n\\begin{equation}\nt\\to \\frac{t}{\\lambda}\\,, \\hspace{1cm} r\\to \\sqrt{\\lambda}\\,r\\,, \n\\end{equation}\nand then send $\\lambda\\to 0$. The resulting solution is conveniently described by introducing a new radial coordinate $\\rho$ related to $r$ by\n\\begin{equation}\n\\rho\\,=\\, \\frac{2r^2}{\\sqrt{\\qq_+ q_-\\qq_0 -{\\hat a}^2}}\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nand using the near-horizon parameters\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:map_asymptotic_charges}\n\\qq_+\\,=\\,q_+\\left[1-\\frac{2\\alpha'}{q_0}\\left(1-\\frac{2a^2}{q_+q_-q_0}\\right)\\right]\\hspace{5mm} \\qq_0\\,=\\, q_0\\left(1+\\frac{\\alpha'}{q_0}\\right)\\,, \\hspace{5mm} \\hat a\\,=\\, a\\left(1+\\frac{2\\alpha'}{q_0}\\right)\\, .\n\\end{equation}\nIn terms of these quantities, the near-horizon limit of the solution reads\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:metricNH}\n\\begin{aligned}\n\\diff s^2\\,=\\,& \\frac{{\\qq}_0}{4} \\left(\\rho^2 \\diff t^2-\\frac{\\diff \\rho^2}{\\rho^2}\\right)-\\frac{\\qq_0}{4}\\left[\\vv^2\\left(\\diff\\psi+\\cos\\theta \\diff \\phi -\\frac{{\\hat a}\\,\\rho \\,\\diff t}{\\vv\\sqrt{\\qq_+ q_-\\qq_0 } } \\right)^2+\\diff\\theta^2+\\sin^2\\theta\\, \\diff \\phi^2\\right]\\\\[1mm]\n-&\\frac{\\qq_+}{\\qq_-}\\left[\\diff z-\\frac{\\vv\\sqrt{\\qq_+ q_-\\qq_0 } \\,\\rho\\,\\diff t}{2\\qq_+} - \\frac{\\hat a}{2\\qq_+}\\left(\\diff \\psi+\\cos \\theta \\diff \\phi\\right)\\right]^2 \\,,\n\\end{aligned}\n\\end{equation}\n\\begin{equation}\nH\\,=\\,\\frac{\\sqrt{\\qq_+ q_-\\qq_0 } \\, v}{2q_-}\\diff t\\wedge \\diff\\rho \\wedge \\diff z+\\frac{\\qq_0}{4}\\sin\\theta \\,\\diff\\theta \\wedge \\diff \\psi\\wedge \\diff \\phi+\\frac{\\hat a}{2q_-}\\sin\\theta\\, \\diff \\theta\\wedge \\diff \\phi\\wedge \\diff z\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nand \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:dilatonNH}\ne^{2\\phi}\\,=\\,g_s^2 \\,\\frac{\\qq_0}{q_-}\\,.\n\\end{equation}\nIt should be noted that we are ignoring the four-torus directions $\\vec y$ as they play essentially no role in our discussion. Then, in this section we will deal with the six-dimensional configuration obtained from dimensional reduction on $T^4$. From \\eqref{eq:metricNH}, we see that the near-horizon geometry is the twisted product of ${\\rm{AdS}}_2\\times S^3\\times S^1$. The squashing of the Hopf fiber is parametrized by $v$, which is given by\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:squashing}\nv\\,=\\,\\sqrt{1-\\frac{{\\hat a}^2}{\\qq_+q_-\\qq_0}}\\,.\n\\end{equation}\nThis is exactly the near-horizon geometry of the two-derivative solution, up to the replacement\n\\begin{equation}\n q_0\\to \\qq_0\\,, \\hspace{1cm} q_+\\to \\qq_+\\,, \\hspace{1cm} \n a\\to \\hat a \\,. \n\\end{equation}\nThis implies that we can always fix our boundary conditions imposing that the near-horizon geometry is held fixed. This is not the case for us here because we decided to fix our boundary conditions at infinity ---namely, keeping the asymptotic charges fixed. An equivalent implication is that the near-horizon limit is a solution of the ``homogeneous'' or uncorrected equations of motion and Bianchi identity, meaning that it solves \\eqref{eq:Bianchi}, \\eqref{eq:Einstein}, \\eqref{eq:dilaton} and \\eqref{eq:B} with the right-hand sides set to zero. Indeed, an explicit computation shows that the near-horizon solution satisfies \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:R_-=0}\n R_{(-)}{}^{ab}\\,=\\,0\\,, \n\\end{equation}\nas found earlier for static black holes with three and four charges in \\cite{DominisPrester:2008ynb, Cano:2018qev, Cano:2018brq, Faedo:2019xii, Cano:2021dyy}. Another property shared with the static case is the fact that $H$ is (anti-)selfdual in six dimensions. In order to see this explicitly, we introduce the following vielbein basis,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:vielbein}\n\\begin{aligned}\ne^0\\,=\\,& \\frac{\\sqrt{\\qq_0}}{2} \\rho \\,\\diff t\\,, \\hspace{2.5mm}e^1\\,=\\, \\frac{\\sqrt{\\qq_0}}{2\\rho} \\,\\diff \\rho\\,, \\hspace{2.5mm} e^2\\,=\\,\\frac{\\sqrt{\\qq_0}}{2}\\diff\\theta\\,, \\hspace{2.5mm} e^3\\,=\\, \\frac{\\sqrt{\\qq_0} v}{2} \\left(\\diff\\psi+\\cos\\theta \\diff \\phi -\\frac{{\\hat a}\\,\\rho \\,\\diff t}{\\vv\\sqrt{\\qq_0 \\qq_+ q_-} }\\right)\\,, \\\\[1mm]\ne^4\\,=\\,& \\frac{\\sqrt{\\qq_0}}{2}\\sin\\theta\\,\\diff \\theta\\,,\\hspace{5mm} e^5\\,=\\, \\sqrt{\\frac{\\qq_+}{q_-}}\\left[\\diff z-\\frac{\\vv\\sqrt{\\qq_0 \\qq_+ q_-} \\,\\rho\\,\\diff t}{2\\qq_+} - \\frac{\\hat a}{2\\qq_+}\\left(\\diff \\psi+\\cos \\theta \\diff \\phi\\right)\\right]\\, ,\n\\end{aligned}\n\\end{equation}\nin terms of which the expression for $H$ reads\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Hflat}\nH\\,=\\,\\frac{2v}{\\sqrt{\\qq_0}}\\left(e^0\\wedge e^1\\wedge e^5+e^2\\wedge e^3\\wedge e^4\\right)+\\frac{2\\hat a}{\\qq_0 \\sqrt{\\qq_+ q_-}}\\left(e^0\\wedge e^1\\wedge e^3+e^2\\wedge e^4\\wedge e^5\\right)\\, .\n\\end{equation}\nTherefore, in our conventions \\eqref{eq:Hodge} we have that\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:antiselfdualH}\nH\\,=\\,-\\star H\\,.\n\\end{equation}\n\n\\subsection{Black hole entropy}\n\nIn this section we compute the corrected entropy of the black hole. As discussed in \\cite{Tachikawa:2006sz, Elgood:2020nls}, Wald formula needs to be generalized as a consequence of the Lorentz Chern-Simons term. Following \\cite{Elgood:2020nls}, we have that the generalized Wald entropy for the heterotic theory is given by\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:gen_Wald_formula}\n{\\cal S}\\,=\\, \\frac{g_s^2}{8 G_6}\\int_{\\Sigma} e^{-2\\phi}\\left[\\star (e^a\\wedge e^b)+\\frac{\\alpha'}{2}\\star R_{(-)}{}^{ab}-\\frac{\\alpha'}{2}\\star H\\wedge \\omega_{(-)}{}^{ab}\\right]n_{ab}\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $G_6$ is the 6D Newton constant, $\\Sigma$ is any spatial cross-section of the horizon\\footnote{Strictly speaking, both the original formula by Wald and the one of \\cite{Elgood:2020nls} are valid for non-extremal black holes, and are given in terms of integrals over the bifurcation surface. However, one can use the results of \\cite{Jacobson:1993vj} to extend them to arbitrary spatial cross-sections of the horizon, rendering them applicable to extremal black holes.} and $n_{ab}$ is the binormal, normalized so that $n_{ab}\\,n^{ab}=-2$. As explained in \\cite{Elgood:2020nls}, the first two terms come from the variation of the Lagrangian with respect to the explicit ocurrences of the Riemann tensor, while the third one comes from the $H\\wedge \\star H$ term, and is not accounted for by the original Wald formula \\cite{Wald:1993nt, Iyer:1994ys}.\n\nWe proceed by choosing $\\Sigma$ to be a $t=$constant slice of the horizon, so that $n_{01}\\,=\\,1$ with respect to the vielbein basis in \\eqref{eq:vielbein}. Making use of \\eqref{eq:R_-=0} and of the self-duality properties for $H$ \\eqref{eq:antiselfdualH}, the above formula reduces to \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:entropy}\n\\begin{aligned}\n{\\cal S}\\,=\\,&\\frac{q_-}{4 G_6\\,\\qq_0}\\int_{\\Sigma} \\left[\\star (e^0\\wedge e^1)+\\frac{\\alpha'}{2}H\\wedge \\omega_{(-)}{}^{01}\\right]\\\\[2mm]\n\\,=\\,&\\frac{q_-}{4 G_6\\,\\qq_0}\\int_{\\Sigma} \\left[1-\\frac{\\alpha'}{2}\\left(H_{234}\\,\\omega_{(-)}{}_{501}+H_{245}\\,\\omega_{(-)}{}_{301}\\right)\\right]e^2\\wedge e^3\\wedge e^4\\wedge e^5\\\\[2mm]\n\\,=\\,&\\frac{q_-}{4 G_6\\,\\qq_0}\\int_{\\Sigma} e^2\\wedge e^3\\wedge e^4\\wedge e^5 \\left(1+\\frac{2\\alpha'}{\\qq_0}\\right)\\\\[2mm]\n\\,=\\,& \\frac{\\pi^2}{2G_5}\\sqrt{\\qq_+ q_- \\qq_0-{\\hat a}^2}\\left(1+\\frac{2\\alpha'}{\\qq_0}\\right)\\,.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\end{equation}\nIn the last line we used the relation between the Newton constants in five and six dimensions, namely $G_6\\,=\\,2\\pi R_z \\, G_5$. Additionally, in order to go from the second to the third line we used the expression for $H$ in \\eqref{eq:Hflat} and that the expressions for the components of the torsionful spin connection $\\omega_{(-)}{}_{abc}$ which are needed are given by\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:comp_omega_-}\n\\omega_{(-)}{}_{501}\\,=\\,-\\frac{2v}{\\sqrt{\\qq_0}}\\,, \\hspace{1cm}\\omega_{(-)}{}_{301}\\,=\\,-\\frac{2\\hat a}{\\qq_0 \\sqrt{\\qq_+q_-}}\\, .\n\\end{equation}\nNext, we use the map \\eqref{eq:map_asymptotic_charges} in order to express the entropy in terms of the asymptotic charges,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:entropyformula1}\n{\\cal S}\\,=\\,\\frac{\\pi^2}{2G_5}\\sqrt{q_+q_-q_0\\left(1-\\ww^2\\right)}\\left(1+\\frac{3\\alpha'}{2q_0}\\frac{1-\\tfrac{4}{3}\\ww^2}{1-\\ww^2}\\right)\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere, following \\cite{Alexandrov:2026rra}, we have defined\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:w_parameter}\n\\ww\\,=\\,\\frac{a}{\\sqrt{q_+ q_-q_0}}\\, ,\n\\end{equation}\nin order to facilitate the comparison with previous results in the literature Before doing so, we use \\eqref{eq:charges} and \\eqref{eq:J_-}, together with the fact that the 5D Newton constant is given by \n\\begin{equation}\nG_5\\,=\\,\\frac{G_6}{2\\pi R_z}\\,=\\,\\frac{G_{10}}{\\left(2\\pi\\right)^5 R_z \\alpha'^2}\\,=\\,\\frac{\\pi g_s^2 \\alpha'^2}{2 R_z}\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nto rewrite the entropy formula \\eqref{eq:entropyformula1} in terms of $Q_+, Q_-, Q_0$ and $J_-$:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:entropyformula2}\n{\\cal S}\\,=\\,2\\pi\\sqrt{Q_+Q_-Q_0\\left(1-\\ww^2\\right)}\\left(1+\\frac{3}{2Q_0}\\frac{1-\\tfrac{4}{3}\\ww^2}{1-\\ww^2}\\right)\\,, \n\\end{equation}\nwhere \n\\begin{equation}\n\\ww\\,=\\,\\frac{J_-}{\\sqrt{Q_+ Q_- Q_0}}\\,. \n\\end{equation}\nFinally, we note that \\eqref{eq:entropyformula2} coincides at next-to-leading order with the large-charge expansion of \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:finalentropy}\n{\\cal S}\\,=\\,2\\pi\\sqrt{Q_+Q_-\\left[Q_0+3-\\ww^2\\left(Q_0+4 \\right)\\right]}\\,, \n\\end{equation}\nwhich precisely agrees with the formula presented in eq.~(7.12) of \\cite{Cassani:2024tvk}, very recently reproduced via a microscopic calculation in \\cite{Alexandrov:2026rra}. As shown in this reference, the agreement with the microscopic result considerably improves when the entropy is written as in \\eqref{eq:finalentropy}, see Fig.~13 in \\cite{Alexandrov:2026rra}. This suggests that \\eqref{eq:finalentropy} might be the exact $\\alpha'$-corrected entropy.\n\n\n\\section{Corrections in the non-supersymmetric case}\n\\label{sec:nonSUSYBMPV}\n\nAt leading order in $\\alpha'$, the bosonic part of the heterotic effective action and equations of motion are invariant under the ${\\mathbb Z}_2$ transformation,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Z2transf}\ng_{\\mu\\nu}\\to g_{\\mu\\nu}\\,, \\hspace{1cm} H\\to -H \\,, \\hspace{1cm} \\phi \\to \\phi\\, .\n\\end{equation}\nThus, if we start from a two-derivative solution and flip the sign of $H$ we will obtain another solution. Although the form of the background fields will look identical in both solutions (up to an obvious sign), they will have different physical properties. In particular, the new solution will not be supersymmetric in general, as the supersymmetric transformations are not left invariant under \\eqref{eq:Z2transf}. Furthermore, the inclusion of $\\alpha'$ corrections breaks the ${\\mathbb Z}_2$ symmetry, and as a consequence the two solutions will differ beyond leading order in $\\alpha'$. \n\nGiven this, it is an interesting exercise to compute the first order $\\alpha'$ corrections to the non-supersymmetric and extremal BMPV solution, obtained by taking the ten-dimensional solution presented in section \\ref{sec:upliftBMPV} and flipping the sign of $H$. As it turns out, the same ansatz used in the previous section works in the non-supersymmetric case as well. In order to encompass both possibilities, we introduce a sign parameter $\\varepsilon$, such that \n\\begin{equation}\n\\varepsilon\\,=\\,+1 \\hspace{2.5mm}\\text{(SUSY)}\\,, \\hspace{1cm}\\varepsilon\\,=\\, -1 \\hspace{2.5mm}\\text{(non-SUSY)}\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nas we show in appendix~\\ref{app:SUSYanalysis}. The ansatz is then given by\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\label{eq:ansatz_metric}\n\\diff s^2&\\,=\\,& \\frac{1}{Z_+ Z_-}\\left(\\diff t+\\omega\\right)^2-Z_0 \\,\\diff s^2_{\\mathbb R^4}- \\frac{Z_+}{Z_-}\\left[\\diff z- Z_+^{-1}\\left(\\diff t+\\omega\\right)\\right]^2-\\diff {\\vec y}^2,\\\\[1mm]\n\\label{eq:ansatz_H}\nH&\\,=\\,&\\varepsilon\\left[-\\,\\diff Z_-^{-1}\\wedge \\left(\\diff t+\\omega\\right)\\wedge \\diff z+ Z_-^{-1}\\star_4\\diff\\omega\\wedge \\diff z+\\star_4\\diff Z_0\\right]\\,,\\\\[1mm]\n\\label{eq:ansatz_phi}\ne^{2\\phi}&\\,=\\,&g_s^2 \\frac{Z_0}{Z_-}\\,,\n\\end{eqnarray}\nwhere, as before,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\omega\\,=\\, W\\left(\\diff \\psi +\\cos \\theta \\diff \\phi\\right)\\,, \n\\end{equation}\nand all the functions of the ansatz are assumed to depend only on the radial coordinate. Following the same steps as in the supersymmetric case, we obtain the $\\alpha'$ corrections to the harmonic functions are given by\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{aligned}\nZ_0\\,=\\,& 1+\\frac{q_0}{r^2}+ \\frac{q_0^2\\,\\alpha'}{r^2 \\left(r^2+q_0\\right){}^2}+{\\cal O}(\\alpha'^2)\\,,\\\\[1mm]\nZ_+\\,=\\,& 1+\\frac{q_+}{r^2}- \\frac{\\left(1+\\varepsilon\\right)\\alpha'}{r^2\\left(r^2+q_0\\right)\\left(r^2+q_-\\right)}\\left(q_+q_--\\frac{2a^2}{r^2+q_0}\\right)+{\\cal O}(\\alpha'^2)\\,,\\\\[1mm]\nZ_-\\,=\\,& 1+\\frac{q_-}{r^2}+{\\cal O}(\\alpha'^2)\\,,\\\\[1mm]\nW\\,=\\,& 1+\\frac{a}{2r^2}+ \\frac{\\left(1+\\varepsilon\\right) a \\,q_0\\,\\alpha'}{2r^2 \\left(r^2+q_0\\right){}^2}+{\\cal O}(\\alpha'^2)\\,.\n\\end{aligned}\n\\end{equation}\nAs found in the static case \\cite{Cano:2021nzo, Ortin:2021win}, we find that the $\\alpha'$ corrections actually simplify in the non-supersymmetric case, as only the function $Z_0$ receives corrections.\n\n\\paragraph{Non-supersymmetric black hole entropy.} The metric and dilaton in the near-horizon limit take the same form as in the supersymmetric solution, \\eqref{eq:metricNH} and \\eqref{eq:dilatonNH}, but bearing in mind that the relation between the near-horizon and asymptotic charges \\eqref{eq:map_asymptotic_charges} is modified by $\\varepsilon$. Indeed, we find that in the non-supersymmetric case\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:nonSUSY_map_asymptotic_charges}\n\\qq_+\\,=\\,q_+\\,, \\hspace{1cm} \\qq_0\\,=\\,q_0\\left(1+\\frac{\\alpha'}{q_0}\\right)\\,, \\hspace{1cm} \\hat a\\,=\\, a\\, ,\\hspace{1cm} \\varepsilon\\,=\\,-1 \\hspace{2.5mm}\\text{(non-SUSY)}\\,.\n\\end{equation}\nAdditionally, the three-form picks an overall sign with respect to the expression in the supersymmetric case \\eqref{eq:Hflat}. Crucially, this sign implies that the two components of the torsionful spin connection entering in the formula for the entropy \\eqref{eq:entropy} vanish. As a consequence, the entropy in the non-supersymmetric case is just given by the area term\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:nonSUSYentropy}\n{\\cal S}_{\\text{non-susy}} \\,=\\,\\frac{\\pi^2}{2G_5}\\sqrt{q_+q_-\\qq_0-a^2}\\,=\\,\\frac{\\pi^2}{2G_5}\\sqrt{q_+q_-q_0\\left(1-\\ww^2\\right)}\\left(1+\\frac{\\alpha'}{2q_0}\\right)\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere we recall that the parameter $\\ww$ was defined in \\eqref{eq:w_parameter}. This result reproduces the one obtained in \\cite{Cano:2021nzo} in the static case, $\\ww\\,=\\,0$. Finally, it should be emphasized that we have obtained the corrections in the non-supersymmetric case just as an academic exercise. Starting with \\cite{Iliesiu:2020qvm}, it has been understood in recent years that non-supersymmetric near-extremal black holes receive large quantum corrections. These modify the density of states, driving it to zero in the extremal limit. Consequently, the above formula for the entropy cannot be really trusted. \n\n\n\\section*{Acknowledgments}\nI would like to thank Davide Cassani, Tom\\'as Ort\\'in and Enrico Turetta for interesting discussions and comments on the draft. I am supported by the University of Padua and the Fondazione Cariparo under the STARS@UNIPD 2025 programme (GRASBH -- The gravitational path integral, supersymmetric black holes and higher-derivative corrections).\n\n\\appendix\n\n\\section{Supersymmetry analysis}\n\\label{app:SUSYanalysis}\nLet us consider the field configuration given in \\eqref{eq:ansatz_metric}, \\eqref{eq:ansatz_H}, \\eqref{eq:ansatz_phi} and make the following choice of zehnbein basis $e^a$, \n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{aligned}\ne^0\\,=\\,&\\frac{1}{\\sqrt{Z_+ Z_-}}\\left(\\diff t+\\omega\\right)\\,, \\hspace{2.5mm} e^1\\,=\\,\\sqrt{Z_0}\\,\\diff r\\,, \\hspace{2.5mm} e^2\\,=\\,\\frac{r\\sqrt{Z_0}}{2}\\,\\diff \\theta\\,, \\hspace{2.5mm} e^3\\,=\\,\\frac{r\\sqrt{Z_0}}{2}\\,\\left(\\diff \\psi+\\cos\\theta\\diff \\phi\\right)\\,,\\\\[1mm]\ne^4\\,=\\,&\\frac{r\\sqrt{Z_0}}{2}\\sin \\theta\\,\\diff \\phi\\,, \\hspace{2.5mm} e^5\\,=\\,\\sqrt{\\frac{Z_+}{Z_-}}\\left[\\diff z- Z_+^{-1}\\left(\\diff t+\\omega\\right)\\right]\\,, \\hspace{2.5mm} e^{i+6}\\,=\\,\\diff y^i\\,,\n\\end{aligned}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $i=1, \\dots, 4$ are the four-torus directions. In this basis, the dilatino Killing spinor equation (KSE), \n\\begin{equation}\n\\delta_{\\epsilon}\\lambda\\,=\\,\\left(\\Gamma^a\\partial_a\\phi -\\frac{1}{12}H_{abc}\\Gamma^{abc}\\right)\\epsilon\\,=\\,0\\, , \n\\end{equation}\nis satisfied for arbitrary choices of the functions $Z_+, Z_-, Z_0, W$ if the following conditions are met:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\left(1-\\varepsilon\\Gamma^{1234}\\right)\\epsilon\\,=\\,0\\,,\\hspace{1cm} \\left(1+\\varepsilon\\Gamma^{05}\\right)\\epsilon\\,=\\,0\\,,\\hspace{1cm} \\left(1+\\Gamma^{05}\\right)\\epsilon\\,=\\,0\\,.\n\\end{equation}\nWe note that the last one is needed only if $W\\neq0$. In this case, the dilatino KSE already informs us that only the configuration with $\\varepsilon\\,=\\,+1$ can be supersymmetric, since we cannot impose the two conditions $\\left(1\\pm\\Gamma^{05}\\right)\\epsilon\\,=\\,0$ simultaneously, unless $\\epsilon=0$. \n\nThus, from now on we assume $\\varepsilon\\,=\\,1$ and that the Killing spinor satisfies\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:KS_cond}\n\\left(1-\\Gamma^{1234}\\right)\\epsilon\\,=\\,0\\,,\\hspace{1cm} \\left(1+\\Gamma^{05}\\right)\\epsilon\\,=\\,0\\,.\n\\end{equation}\nUnder these assumptions, the gravitino KSE,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\delta_\\epsilon \\psi_a\\,=\\,\\left(\\partial_a-\\frac{1}{4}\\Omega_{(+)}{}_{abc}\\Gamma^{bc}\\right)\\epsilon\\,=\\,0\\,, \n\\end{equation}\nboils down to the following first-order differential equations,\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n\\partial_t\\epsilon&\\,=\\,&\\partial_\\psi\\epsilon\\,=\\,\\partial_z\\epsilon\\,=\\,\\partial_{y^i}\\epsilon\\,=\\,0\\,,\\\\[1mm]\n\\label{eq:radialeq}\n\\partial_r\\epsilon&\\,=\\,&-\\frac{1}{4}\\left(\\frac{Z_+'}{Z_+}+\\frac{Z_-'}{Z_-}\\right)\\epsilon\\,,\\\\[1mm]\n\\label{eq:thetaeq}\n\\partial_\\theta\\epsilon&\\,=\\,&-\\frac{\\Gamma^{12}}{2}\\epsilon\\,,\\\\[1mm]\n\\label{eq:phieq}\n\\partial_\\phi\\epsilon&\\,=\\,&-\\frac{1}{2}\\left(\\sin \\theta \\,\\Gamma^{14}+\\cos\\theta \\,\\Gamma^{13}\\right)\\epsilon\\,=\\,-\\frac{1}{2}\\left(-\\sin \\theta \\,\\Gamma^{12}+\\cos\\theta \\,\\right)\\Gamma^{13}\\epsilon\\,.\n\\end{eqnarray}\nTo solve this system of equations, we make an ansatz of the form\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:ansatzKS}\n\\epsilon\\,=\\, \\epsilon_r(r)M(\\theta)N(\\phi)\\epsilon_0\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\epsilon_r(r)$ is a function, $M(\\theta)$ and $N(\\phi)$ are matrices ---which are assumed to commute with the projectors in \\eqref{eq:KS_cond}--- and $\\epsilon_0$ is a constant spinor satisfying \\eqref{eq:KS_cond}, namely\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:KS_cond_0}\n\\left(1-\\Gamma^{1234}\\right)\\epsilon_0\\,=\\,0\\,,\\hspace{1cm} \\left(1+\\Gamma^{05}\\right)\\epsilon_0\\,=\\,0\\,.\n\\end{equation}\nThen we can straightforwardly integrate the radial equation \\eqref{eq:radialeq}, obtaining that\n\\begin{equation}\n \\epsilon_r\\,=\\, \\left(Z_+Z_-\\right)^{-\\tfrac{1}{4}} \\,. \n\\end{equation}\nNext we plug \\eqref{eq:ansatzKS} in \\eqref{eq:thetaeq}, which yields the following matrix differential equation,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\left(\\frac{\\diff M(\\theta)}{\\diff \\theta}+\\frac{1}{2}\\Gamma^{12}M(\\theta) \\right)\\,N(\\phi)\\,\\epsilon_0\\,=\\,0\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nwhich is solved by \n\\begin{equation}\nM(\\theta)\\,=\\,e^{-\\frac{1}{2}\\Gamma^{12}\\theta}\\,=\\,\\cos\\left(\\tfrac{\\theta}{2}\\right)-\\sin\\left(\\tfrac{\\theta}{2}\\right)\\Gamma^{12}\\,. \n\\end{equation}\nThis satisfies the property,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\left(\\cos \\theta-\\sin \\theta \\Gamma^{12}\\right)\\Gamma^{13}M(\\theta)\\,=\\,M(\\theta)\\Gamma^{13}\\,, \n\\end{equation}\nwhich can be used in \\eqref{eq:phieq} to find that $N(\\phi)$ satisfies the differential equation, \n\\begin{equation}\n \\frac{\\diff N(\\phi)}{\\diff \\phi} + \\frac{1}{2}\\Gamma^{13}N(\\phi)\\,=\\,0\\,, \n\\end{equation}\nso that \n\\begin{equation}\nN(\\phi)\\,=\\,e^{-\\frac{1}{2}\\Gamma^{13}\\phi}\\,=\\,\\cos\\left(\\tfrac{\\phi}{2}\\right)-\\sin\\left(\\tfrac{\\phi}{2}\\right)\\Gamma^{13}\\,.\n\\end{equation}\nThus, the Killing spinor is given by \n\\begin{equation}\n\\epsilon\\,=\\,\\frac{1}{\\left(Z_+Z_-\\right)^{1/4}}\\left[\\cos\\left(\\tfrac{\\theta}{2}\\right)-\\sin\\left(\\tfrac{\\theta}{2}\\right)\\Gamma^{12}\\right]\\left[\\cos\\left(\\tfrac{\\phi}{2}\\right)-\\sin\\left(\\tfrac{\\phi}{2}\\right)\\Gamma^{13}\\right]\\epsilon_0\\,,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere we recall that $\\epsilon_0$ is a constant spinor satisfying the two conditions in \\eqref{eq:KS_cond_0}, which imply that field configuration preserves one-quarter of the total number of supersymmetries.\n\\bibliography{refs.bib}\n\\bibliographystyle{JHEP}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n \n\n\n================================================\nFILE: refs.bib\n================================================\n@article{Iliesiu:2020qvm,\n author = \"Iliesiu, Luca V. and Turiaci, Gustavo J.\",\n title = \"{The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes}\",\n eprint = \"2003.02860\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP05(2021)145\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"145\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Boruch:2025qdq,\n author = \"Boruch, Jan and Emparan, Roberto and Iliesiu, Luca V. and Murthy, Sameer\",\n title = \"{The gravitational index of 5d black holes and black strings}\",\n eprint = \"2501.17909\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP06(2025)145\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n pages = \"145\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Cassani:2024kjn,\n author = \"Cassani, Davide and Ruip{\\'e}rez, Alejandro and Turetta, Enrico\",\n title = \"{Localization of the 5D supergravity action and Euclidean saddles for the black hole index}\",\n eprint = \"2409.01332\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP12(2024)086\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"12\",\n pages = \"086\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Anupam:2023yns,\n author = \"Anupam, A. H. and Chowdhury, Chandramouli and Sen, Ashoke\",\n title = \"{Revisiting logarithmic correction to five dimensional BPS black hole entropy}\",\n eprint = \"2308.00038\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP05(2024)070\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"070\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{LopesCardoso:1999fsj,\n author = \"Lopes Cardoso, Gabriel and de Wit, Bernard and Mohaupt, Thomas\",\n title = \"{Macroscopic entropy formulae and nonholomorphic corrections for supersymmetric black holes}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/9906094\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"AEI-111, THU-99-11\",\n doi = \"10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00560-X\",\n journal = \"Nucl. Phys. B\",\n volume = \"567\",\n pages = \"87--110\",\n year = \"2000\"\n}\n\n@article{Behrndt:1996jn,\n author = \"Behrndt, Klaus and Lopes Cardoso, Gabriel and de Wit, Bernard and Kallosh, Renata and Lust, Dieter and Mohaupt, Thomas\",\n title = \"{Classical and quantum N=2 supersymmetric black holes}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/9610105\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-TH-96-276, HUB-EP-96-53, SU-ITP-96-41, THU-96-34\",\n doi = \"10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00028-X\",\n journal = \"Nucl. Phys. B\",\n volume = \"488\",\n pages = \"236--260\",\n year = \"1997\"\n}\n\n@article{Cassani:2023vsa,\n author = \"Cassani, Davide and Ruip{\\'e}rez, Alejandro and Turetta, Enrico\",\n title = \"{Boundary terms and conserved charges in higher-derivative gauged supergravity}\",\n eprint = \"2304.06101\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP06(2023)203\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n pages = \"203\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{Chen:2024gmc,\n author = \"Chen, Yiming and Murthy, Sameer and Turiaci, Gustavo J.\",\n title = \"{Gravitational index of the heterotic string}\",\n eprint = \"2402.03297\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP09(2024)041\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"09\",\n pages = \"041\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Sen:1995in,\n author = \"Sen, Ashoke\",\n title = \"{Extremal black holes and elementary string states}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/9504147\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"TIFR-TH-95-19\",\n doi = \"10.1142/S0217732395002234\",\n journal = \"Mod. Phys. Lett. A\",\n volume = \"10\",\n pages = \"2081--2094\",\n year = \"1995\"\n}\n\n@article{Sen:2005pu,\n author = \"Sen, Ashoke\",\n title = \"{Black holes, elementary strings and holomorphic anomaly}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0502126\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2005/07/063\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"07\",\n pages = \"063\",\n year = \"2005\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Eloy:2020dko,\n author = \"Eloy, Camille and Hohm, Olaf and Samtleben, Henning\",\n title = \"{Duality Invariance and Higher Derivatives}\",\n eprint = \"2004.13140\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.101.126018\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"101\",\n number = \"12\",\n pages = \"126018\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Cai:2026qrr,\n author = \"Cai, Yide and Jayaprakash, Sabarenath and Liu, James T. and Pang, Yi and Saskowski, Robert J.\",\n title = \"{New $F^4$ invariants in five-dimensional supergravity}\",\n eprint = \"2603.18180\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"LITP-26-06, USTC-ICTS/PCFT-26-15\",\n month = \"3\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Gupta:2021roy,\n author = \"Gupta, Rajesh Kumar and Murthy, Sameer and Sahni, Manya\",\n title = \"{Quantum entropy of BMPV black holes and the topological M-theory conjecture}\",\n eprint = \"2104.02634\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP06(2022)053\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n pages = \"053\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Dabholkar:1989jt,\n author = \"Dabholkar, Atish and Harvey, Jeffrey A.\",\n title = \"{Nonrenormalization of the Superstring Tension}\",\n reportNumber = \"PUPT-1122\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.478\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"63\",\n pages = \"478\",\n year = \"1989\"\n}\n\n@article{Ma:2025vjk,\n author = \"Ma, Liang and Lu, H.\",\n title = \"{Quadratic curvature correction to 5D Myers-Perry metric}\",\n eprint = \"2512.23797\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP05(2026)081\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"081\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Hu:2025aji,\n author = \"Hu, Peng-Ju and Ma, Liang and Pang, Yi and Saskowski, Robert J.\",\n title = \"{Higher-derivative heterotic Kerr-Sen black holes}\",\n eprint = \"2506.20077\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"USTC-ICTS/PCFT-25-23\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP02(2026)235\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"02\",\n pages = \"235\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Cano:2021rey,\n author = \"Cano, Pablo A. and Ruip{\\'e}rez, Alejandro\",\n title = \"{String gravity in D=4}\",\n eprint = \"2111.04750\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.105.044022\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"105\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"044022\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Cano:2019ore,\n author = \"Cano, Pablo A. and Ruip{\\'e}rez, Alejandro\",\n title = \"{Leading higher-derivative corrections to Kerr geometry}\",\n eprint = \"1901.01315\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"gr-qc\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-19-2\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP05(2019)189\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"189\",\n year = \"2019\",\n note = \"[Erratum: JHEP 03, 187 (2020)]\"\n}\n\n@article{Cano:2019ycn,\n author = \"Cano, Pablo A. and Chimento, Samuele and Linares, Rom{\\'a}n and Ort{\\'\\i}n, Tom{\\'a}s and Ram{\\'\\i}rez, Pedro F.\",\n title = {{$\\alpha'$ corrections of Reissner-Nordstr{\\\"o}m black holes}},\n eprint = \"1910.14324\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-18-114\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP02(2020)031\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"02\",\n pages = \"031\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Cano:2019oma,\n author = \"Cano, Pablo A. and Ort{\\'\\i}n, Tom{\\'a}s and Ramirez, Pedro F.\",\n title = \"{On the extremality bound of stringy black holes}\",\n eprint = \"1909.08530\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-19-125, IFUM-1079-FT\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP02(2020)175\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"02\",\n pages = \"175\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Cano:2022tmn,\n author = \"Cano, Pablo A. and Ort{\\'\\i}n, Tom{\\'a}s and Ruip{\\'e}rez, Alejandro and Zatti, Matteo\",\n title = \"{Non-extremal, $\\alpha$'-corrected black holes in 5-dimensional heterotic superstring theory}\",\n eprint = \"2210.01861\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-22-122\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP12(2022)150\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"12\",\n pages = \"150\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Zatti:2023oiq,\n author = \"Zatti, Matteo\",\n title = \"{$\\alpha'$ corrections to 4-dimensional non-extremal stringy black holes}\",\n eprint = \"2308.12879\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-23-108\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP11(2023)185\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"11\",\n pages = \"185\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Massai:2023cis,\n author = \"Massai, Stefano and Ruip{\\'e}rez, Alejandro and Zatti, Matteo\",\n title = \"{Revisiting $\\alpha'$ corrections to heterotic two-charge black holes}\",\n eprint = \"2311.03308\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-23-143\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP04(2024)150\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"04\",\n pages = \"150\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Dabholkar:2004yr,\n author = \"Dabholkar, Atish\",\n title = \"{Exact counting of black hole microstates}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0409148\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"SLAC-PUB-10717, SU-ITP-04-36, TIFR-TH-04-23\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.241301\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"94\",\n pages = \"241301\",\n year = \"2005\"\n}\n\n@article{Ruiperez:2020qda,\n author = \"Ruip{\\'e}rez, Alejandro\",\n title = \"{Higher-derivative corrections to small black rings}\",\n eprint = \"2003.02269\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-20-37\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1361-6382/abff9b\",\n journal = \"Class. Quant. Grav.\",\n volume = \"38\",\n number = \"14\",\n pages = \"145011\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Cano:2018hut,\n author = \"Cano, Pablo A. and Ram{\\'\\i}rez, Pedro F. and Ruip{\\'e}rez, Alejandro\",\n title = \"{The small black hole illusion}\",\n eprint = \"1808.10449\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-18-92, IFUM-1064-FT, IFUM-1062-FT\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP03(2020)115\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"03\",\n pages = \"115\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Callan:1988hs,\n author = \"Callan, Jr., Curtis G. and Myers, Robert C. and Perry, M. J.\",\n title = \"{Black Holes in String Theory}\",\n reportNumber = \"NSF-ITP-88-79\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0550-3213(89)90172-7\",\n journal = \"Nucl. Phys. B\",\n volume = \"311\",\n pages = \"673--698\",\n year = \"1989\"\n}\n\n@article{Cvetic:1996xz,\n author = \"Cvetic, Mirjam and Youm, Donam\",\n title = \"{General rotating five-dimensional black holes of toroidally compactified heterotic string}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/9603100\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"IASSNS-HEP-96-24, PUPT-1602\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0550-3213(96)00355-0\",\n journal = \"Nucl. Phys. B\",\n volume = \"476\",\n pages = \"118--132\",\n year = \"1996\"\n}\n\n@article{Cvetic:1995uj,\n author = \"Cvetic, Mirjam and Youm, Donam\",\n title = \"{Dyonic BPS saturated black holes of heterotic string on a six torus}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/9507090\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"UPR-0672-TA, UPR-672-TA\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.53.R584\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"53\",\n pages = \"584--588\",\n year = \"1996\"\n}\n\n@article{Cassani:2021fyv,\n author = \"Cassani, Davide and Komargodski, Zohar\",\n title = \"{EFT and the SUSY Index on the 2nd Sheet}\",\n eprint = \"2104.01464\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.21468/SciPostPhys.11.1.004\",\n journal = \"SciPost Phys.\",\n volume = \"11\",\n pages = \"004\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Sahoo:2006pm,\n author = \"Sahoo, Bindusar and Sen, Ashoke\",\n title = \"{alpha-prime - corrections to extremal dyonic black holes in heterotic string theory}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0608182\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2007/01/010\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"01\",\n pages = \"010\",\n year = \"2007\"\n}\n\n@article{Sen:2008vm,\n author = \"Sen, Ashoke\",\n title = \"{Quantum Entropy Function from AdS(2)/CFT(1) Correspondence}\",\n eprint = \"0809.3304\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1142/S0217751X09045893\",\n journal = \"Int. J. Mod. Phys. A\",\n volume = \"24\",\n pages = \"4225--4244\",\n year = \"2009\"\n}\n\n@article{Bergshoeff:1980is,\n author = \"Bergshoeff, E. and de Roo, M. and de Wit, B.\",\n title = \"{Extended Conformal Supergravity}\",\n reportNumber = \"NIKHEF-H/80-07\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0550-3213(81)90465-X\",\n journal = \"Nucl. Phys. B\",\n volume = \"182\",\n pages = \"173--204\",\n year = \"1981\"\n}\n\n@article{Bobev:2020egg,\n author = \"Bobev, Nikolay and Charles, Anthony M. and Hristov, Kiril and Reys, Valentin\",\n title = \"{The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Higher-Derivative Supergravity in AdS$_4$ Holography}\",\n eprint = \"2006.09390\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.131601\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"125\",\n number = \"13\",\n pages = \"131601\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Cassani:2026teb,\n author = \"Cassani, Davide and Turetta, Enrico\",\n title = \"{The black hole at the end of the cone: localizing the anomaly polynomial on toric geometries}\",\n eprint = \"2606.16986\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n month = \"6\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Ohmori:2021dzb,\n author = \"Ohmori, Kantaro and Tizzano, Luigi\",\n title = \"{Anomaly matching across dimensions and supersymmetric Cardy formulae}\",\n eprint = \"2112.13445\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP12(2022)027\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"12\",\n pages = \"027\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Gaar:2026nqq,\n author = \"Gaar, Florian and Gauntlett, Jerome P. and Park, Jaeha and Sparks, James\",\n title = \"{The superconformal index and localizing higher derivative supergravity}\",\n eprint = \"2604.09490\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n month = \"4\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n\n@article{BenettiGenolini:2026qdm,\n author = \"Benetti Genolini, Pietro and Gaar, Florian and Gauntlett, Jerome P. and Sparks, James\",\n title = \"{Equivariant localization for higher derivative supergravity}\",\n eprint = \"2604.08656\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n month = \"4\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Cassani:2024tvk,\n author = \"Cassani, Davide and Ruip{\\'e}rez, Alejandro and Turetta, Enrico\",\n title = \"{Higher-derivative corrections to flavoured BPS black hole thermodynamics and holography}\",\n eprint = \"2403.02410\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP05(2024)276\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"276\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Cassani:2022lrk,\n author = \"Cassani, Davide and Ruip{\\'e}rez, Alejandro and Turetta, Enrico\",\n title = \"{Corrections to AdS$_{5}$ black hole thermodynamics from higher-derivative supergravity}\",\n eprint = \"2208.01007\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP11(2022)059\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"11\",\n pages = \"059\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Bobev:2022bjm,\n author = \"Bobev, Nikolay and Dimitrov, Vasil and Reys, Valentin and Vekemans, Annelien\",\n title = \"{Higher derivative corrections and AdS5 black holes}\",\n eprint = \"2207.10671\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L121903\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"106\",\n number = \"12\",\n pages = \"L121903\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Bobev:2021oku,\n author = \"Bobev, Nikolay and Charles, Anthony M. and Hristov, Kiril and Reys, Valentin\",\n title = \"{Higher-derivative supergravity, AdS$_{4}$ holography, and black holes}\",\n eprint = \"2106.04581\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP08(2021)173\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"08\",\n pages = \"173\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Reall:2019sah,\n author = \"Reall, Harvey S. and Santos, Jorge E.\",\n title = \"{Higher derivative corrections to Kerr black hole thermodynamics}\",\n eprint = \"1901.11535\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP04(2019)021\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"04\",\n pages = \"021\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n@article{Sen:2005iz,\n author = \"Sen, Ashoke\",\n title = \"{Entropy function for heterotic black holes}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0508042\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2006/03/008\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"03\",\n pages = \"008\",\n year = \"2006\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Castro:2008ys,\n author = \"Castro, Alejandra and Murthy, Sameer\",\n title = \"{Corrections to the statistical entropy of five dimensional black holes}\",\n eprint = \"0807.0237\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2009/06/024\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n pages = \"024\",\n year = \"2009\"\n}\n\n@article{deWit:2009de,\n author = \"de Wit, Bernard and Katmadas, Stefanos\",\n title = \"{Near-Horizon Analysis of D=5 BPS Black Holes and Rings}\",\n eprint = \"0910.4907\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"ITP-UU-09-78, SPIN-09-36\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP02(2010)056\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"02\",\n pages = \"056\",\n year = \"2010\"\n}\n\n@article{Guica:2005ig,\n author = \"Guica, Monica and Huang, Lisa and Li, Wei and Strominger, Andrew\",\n title = \"{R**2 corrections for 5-D black holes and rings}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0505188\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2006/10/036\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"10\",\n pages = \"036\",\n year = \"2006\"\n}\n\n@article{Castro:2007ci,\n author = \"Castro, Alejandra and Davis, Joshua L. and Kraus, Per and Larsen, Finn\",\n title = \"{Precision Entropy of Spinning Black Holes}\",\n eprint = \"0705.1847\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/003\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"09\",\n pages = \"003\",\n year = \"2007\"\n}\n\n@article{Castro:2008ne,\n author = \"Castro, Alejandra and Davis, Joshua L. and Kraus, Per and Larsen, Finn\",\n title = \"{String Theory Effects on Five-Dimensional Black Hole Physics}\",\n eprint = \"0801.1863\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1142/S0217751X08039724\",\n journal = \"Int. J. Mod. Phys. A\",\n volume = \"23\",\n pages = \"613--691\",\n year = \"2008\"\n}\n\n@article{Castro:2007hc,\n author = \"Castro, Alejandra and Davis, Joshua L. and Kraus, Per and Larsen, Finn\",\n title = \"{5D Black Holes and Strings with Higher Derivatives}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0703087\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2007/06/007\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n pages = \"007\",\n year = \"2007\"\n}\n\n@article{Hanaki:2006pj,\n author = \"Hanaki, Kentaro and Ohashi, Keisuke and Tachikawa, Yuji\",\n title = \"{Supersymmetric Completion of an R**2 term in Five-dimensional Supergravity}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0611329\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"TIT-HEP-562\",\n doi = \"10.1143/PTP.117.533\",\n journal = \"Prog. Theor. Phys.\",\n volume = \"117\",\n pages = \"533\",\n year = \"2007\"\n}\n\n@article{Behrndt:1998eq,\n author = \"Behrndt, Klaus and Lopes Cardoso, Gabriel and de Wit, Bernard and Lust, Dieter and Mohaupt, Thomas and Sabra, Wafic A.\",\n title = \"{Higher order black hole solutions in N=2 supergravity and Calabi-Yau string backgrounds}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/9801081\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"HUB-EP-98-4, THU-98-02, QMW-PH-98-01\",\n doi = \"10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00413-4\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett. B\",\n volume = \"429\",\n pages = \"289--296\",\n year = \"1998\"\n}\n\n@book{Freedman:2012zz,\n author = \"Freedman, Daniel Z. and Van Proeyen, Antoine\",\n title = \"{Supergravity}\",\n doi = \"10.1017/CBO9781139026833\",\n isbn = \"978-1-139-36806-3, 978-0-521-19401-3\",\n publisher = \"Cambridge Univ. Press\",\n address = \"Cambridge, UK\",\n month = \"5\",\n year = \"2012\"\n}\n\n@article{deWit:1980lyi,\n author = \"de Wit, B. and van Holten, J. W. and Van Proeyen, Antoine\",\n title = \"{Structure of N=2 Supergravity}\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-TH-2985\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0550-3213(83)90548-5\",\n journal = \"Nucl. Phys. B\",\n volume = \"184\",\n pages = \"77\",\n year = \"1981\",\n note = \"[Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 222, 516 (1983)]\"\n}\n\n@inproceedings{Bergshoeff:1980sw,\n author = \"Bergshoeff, E. and de Roo, M. and van Holten, J. W. and de Wit, B. and Van Proeyen, Antoine\",\n title = \"{Extended Conformal Supergravity and Its Applications}\",\n booktitle = \"{Nuffield Workshop on Superspace and Supergravity}\",\n reportNumber = \"PRINT-80-0785 (AMSTERDAM)\",\n month = \"6\",\n year = \"1980\"\n}\n\n@inbook{Cassani:2025sim,\n author = \"Cassani, Davide and Murthy, Sameer\",\n title = \"{Quantum black holes: supersymmetry and exact results}\",\n eprint = \"2502.15360\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n month = \"2\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n@article{Mandal:2010cj,\n author = \"Mandal, Ipsita and Sen, Ashoke\",\n editor = \"Baulieu, Laurent and de Boer, Jan and Douglas, Michael and Rabinovici, Eliezer and Vanhove, Pierre and Windey, Paul\",\n title = \"{Black Hole Microstate Counting and its Macroscopic Counterpart}\",\n eprint = \"1008.3801\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1088/0264-9381/27/21/214003\",\n journal = \"Class. Quant. Grav.\",\n volume = \"27\",\n pages = \"214003\",\n year = \"2010\"\n}\n\n@article{Gross:1986mw,\n author = \"Gross, David J. and Sloan, John H.\",\n title = \"{The Quartic Effective Action for the Heterotic String}\",\n reportNumber = \"NSF-ITP-87-02\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0550-3213(87)90465-2\",\n journal = \"Nucl. Phys. B\",\n volume = \"291\",\n pages = \"41--89\",\n year = \"1987\"\n}\n\n@article{Metsaev:1987zx,\n author = \"Metsaev, R. R. and Tseytlin, Arkady A.\",\n title = \"{Order alpha-prime (Two Loop) Equivalence of the String Equations of Motion and the Sigma Model Weyl Invariance Conditions: Dependence on the Dilaton and the Antisymmetric Tensor}\",\n reportNumber = \"PRINT-87-0184 (LEBEDEV)\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0550-3213(87)90077-0\",\n journal = \"Nucl. Phys. B\",\n volume = \"293\",\n pages = \"385--419\",\n year = \"1987\"\n}\n\n@article{Ozkan:2024euj,\n author = \"Ozkan, Mehmet and Pang, Yi and Sezgin, Ergin\",\n title = \"{Higher derivative supergravities in diverse dimensions}\",\n eprint = \"2401.08945\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"MI-HET-826\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.physrep.2024.07.002\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rept.\",\n volume = \"1086\",\n pages = \"1--95\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Maldacena:1997de,\n author = \"Maldacena, Juan Martin and Strominger, Andrew and Witten, Edward\",\n title = \"{Black hole entropy in M theory}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/9711053\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/1997/12/002\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"12\",\n pages = \"002\",\n year = \"1997\"\n}\n\n@article{Mohaupt:2000mj,\n author = \"Mohaupt, Thomas\",\n title = \"{Black hole entropy, special geometry and strings}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0007195\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1002/1521-3978(200102)49:1/3<3::AID-PROP3>3.0.CO;2-#\",\n journal = \"Fortsch. Phys.\",\n volume = \"49\",\n pages = \"3--161\",\n year = \"2001\"\n}\n\n@article{LopesCardoso:2000qm,\n author = \"Lopes Cardoso, Gabriel and de Wit, Bernard and Kappeli, Jurg and Mohaupt, Thomas\",\n title = \"{Stationary BPS solutions in N=2 supergravity with R**2 interactions}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0009234\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"SPIN-2000-21, SPIN-00-21, ITP-UU-00-24, SU-ITP-00-19\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2000/12/019\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"12\",\n pages = \"019\",\n year = \"2000\"\n}\n\n@article{LopesCardoso:1998tkj,\n author = \"Lopes Cardoso, Gabriel and de Wit, Bernard and Mohaupt, Thomas\",\n title = \"{Corrections to macroscopic supersymmetric black hole entropy}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/9812082\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"SPIN-1998-11, THU-98-44\",\n doi = \"10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00227-0\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett. B\",\n volume = \"451\",\n pages = \"309--316\",\n year = \"1999\"\n}\n\n@article{Sen:2005wa,\n author = \"Sen, Ashoke\",\n title = \"{Black hole entropy function and the attractor mechanism in higher derivative gravity}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0506177\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2005/09/038\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"09\",\n pages = \"038\",\n year = \"2005\"\n}\n\n@article{Sen:2007qy,\n author = \"Sen, Ashoke\",\n title = \"{Black Hole Entropy Function, Attractors and Precision Counting of Microstates}\",\n eprint = \"0708.1270\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/s10714-008-0626-4\",\n journal = \"Gen. Rel. Grav.\",\n volume = \"40\",\n pages = \"2249--2431\",\n year = \"2008\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Strominger:1996sh,\n author = \"Strominger, Andrew and Vafa, Cumrun\",\n title = \"{Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/9601029\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"HUTP-96-A002, RU-96-01\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0370-2693(96)00345-0\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett. B\",\n volume = \"379\",\n pages = \"99--104\",\n year = \"1996\"\n}\n\n@article{Ortin:2019sex,\n author = \"Ort{\\'\\i}n, Tom{\\'a}s and Ruip{\\'e}rez, Alejandro\",\n title = \"{Non-Abelian Rotating Black Holes in 4- and 5-Dimensional Gauged Supergravity}\",\n eprint = \"1905.00016\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-19-14\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP11(2019)167\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"11\",\n pages = \"167\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n@article{Chimento:2018kop,\n author = \"Chimento, Samuele and Meessen, Patrick and Ortin, Tomas and Ramirez, Pedro F. and Ruiperez, Alejandro\",\n title = \"{On a family of $\\alpha'$-corrected solutions of the Heterotic Superstring effective action}\",\n eprint = \"1803.04463\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"FPAUO-18/03, IFT-UAM/CSIC-18-018, IFUM-1058-FT\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP07(2018)080\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"07\",\n pages = \"080\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n@article{Jayaprakash:2024xlr,\n author = \"Jayaprakash, Sabarenath and Liu, James T.\",\n title = \"{Higher derivative heterotic supergravity on a torus and supersymmetry}\",\n eprint = \"2406.14600\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"LCTP-24-11\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP12(2024)076\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"12\",\n pages = \"076\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Baron:2017dvb,\n author = \"Baron, Walter H. and Fernandez-Melgarejo, Jose J. and Marques, Diego and Nunez, Carmen\",\n title = \"{The Odd story of {\\ensuremath{\\alpha}}'-corrections}\",\n eprint = \"1702.05489\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"YITP-17-18\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP04(2017)078\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"04\",\n pages = \"078\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n@book{Ortin:2015hya,\n author = \"Ortin, Tomas\",\n title = \"{Gravity and Strings}\",\n edition = \"2nd ed.\",\n doi = \"10.1017/CBO9781139019750\",\n isbn = \"978-0-521-76813-9, 978-0-521-76813-9, 978-1-316-23579-9\",\n publisher = \"Cambridge University Press\",\n series = \"Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics\",\n month = \"7\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n\n@article{Jacobson:1993vj,\n author = \"Jacobson, Ted and Kang, Gungwon and Myers, Robert C.\",\n title = \"{On black hole entropy}\",\n eprint = \"gr-qc/9312023\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"MCGILL-93-22, NSF-ITP-93-152, UMDGR-94-75\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.49.6587\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"49\",\n pages = \"6587--6598\",\n year = \"1994\"\n}\n\n@article{Ortin:2021win,\n author = \"Ort{\\'\\i}n, Tom{\\'a}s and Ruip{\\'e}rez, Alejandro and Zatti, Matteo\",\n title = \"{Extremal stringy black holes in equilibrium at first order in $\\alpha'$}\",\n eprint = \"2112.12764\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-21-066\",\n doi = \"10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.6.4.072\",\n journal = \"SciPost Phys. Core\",\n volume = \"6\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"072\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{Cano:2021nzo,\n author = \"Cano, Pablo A. and Ort{\\'\\i}n, Tom{\\'a}s and Ruip{\\'e}rez, Alejandro and Zatti, Matteo\",\n title = \"{Non-supersymmetric black holes with {\\ensuremath{\\alpha}}' corrections}\",\n eprint = \"2111.15579\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-21-116\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP03(2022)103\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"03\",\n pages = \"103\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Alexandrov:2026rra,\n author = \"Alexandrov, Sergei and Klemm, Albrecht and Pioline, Boris\",\n title = \"{Large Order Enumerative Geometry, Black Holes and Black Rings}\",\n eprint = \"2605.19552\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n month = \"5\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@book{Ortin:2004ms,\n author = \"Ortin, Tomas\",\n title = \"{Gravity and strings}\",\n doi = \"10.1017/CBO9780511616563\",\n isbn = \"978-0-521-82475-0\",\n publisher = \"Cambridge Univ. Press\",\n series = \"Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics\",\n month = \"3\",\n year = \"2004\"\n}\n\n@article{Iyer:1994ys,\n author = \"Iyer, Vivek and Wald, Robert M.\",\n title = \"{Some properties of Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy}\",\n eprint = \"gr-qc/9403028\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.50.846\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"50\",\n pages = \"846--864\",\n year = \"1994\"\n}\n\n@article{Wald:1993nt,\n author = \"Wald, Robert M.\",\n title = \"{Black hole entropy is the Noether charge}\",\n eprint = \"gr-qc/9307038\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"EFI-93-42\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.48.R3427\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"48\",\n number = \"8\",\n pages = \"R3427--R3431\",\n year = \"1993\"\n}\n\n@article{Elgood:2020nls,\n author = \"Elgood, Zachary and Ort{\\'\\i}n, Tom{\\'a}s and Pere{\\~n}{\\'\\i}guez, David\",\n title = \"{The first law and Wald entropy formula of heterotic stringy black holes at first order in $\\alpha'$}\",\n eprint = \"2012.14892\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-20-182\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP05(2021)110\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"110\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Tachikawa:2006sz,\n author = \"Tachikawa, Yuji\",\n title = \"{Black hole entropy in the presence of Chern-Simons terms}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/0611141\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1088/0264-9381/24/3/014\",\n journal = \"Class. Quant. Grav.\",\n volume = \"24\",\n pages = \"737--744\",\n year = \"2007\"\n}\n\n@article{Cano:2021dyy,\n author = \"Cano, Pablo A. and Murcia, {\\'A}ngel and Ram{\\'\\i}rez, Pedro F. and Ruip{\\'e}rez, Alejandro\",\n title = \"{On small black holes, KK monopoles and solitonic 5-branes}\",\n eprint = \"2102.04476\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP05(2021)272\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"272\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Faedo:2019xii,\n author = \"Faedo, Federico and Ramirez, Pedro F.\",\n title = \"{Exact charges from heterotic black holes}\",\n eprint = \"1906.12287\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IFUM-1077-FT\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP10(2019)033\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"10\",\n pages = \"033\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n@article{DominisPrester:2008ynb,\n author = \"Dominis Prester, Predrag and Terzic, Tomislav\",\n title = \"{$\\alpha'$-exact entropies for BPS and non-BPS extremal dyonic black holes in heterotic string theory from ten-dimensional supersymmetry}\",\n eprint = \"0809.4954\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2008/12/088\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"12\",\n pages = \"088\",\n year = \"2008\"\n}\n\n@article{Cano:2018qev,\n author = \"Cano, Pablo A. and Meessen, Patrick and Ort{\\'\\i}n, Tom{\\'a}s and Ram{\\'\\i}rez, Pedro F.\",\n title = \"{$\\alpha'$-corrected black holes in String Theory}\",\n eprint = \"1803.01919\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"FPAUO-18/01, IFT-UAM/CSIC-17-107, FPAUO-18-01, IFT-UAM-CSIC-17-107, IFUM-1057-FT\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP05(2018)110\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"05\",\n pages = \"110\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n@article{Cano:2018brq,\n author = \"Cano, Pablo A. and Chimento, Samuele and Meessen, Patrick and Ort{\\'\\i}n, Tom{\\'a}s and Ram{\\'\\i}rez, Pedro F. and Ruip{\\'e}rez, Alejandro\",\n title = \"{Beyond the near-horizon limit: Stringy corrections to Heterotic Black Holes}\",\n eprint = \"1808.03651\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-17-091, IFUM-1061-FT\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP02(2019)192\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"02\",\n pages = \"192\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n@article{Elgood:2020xwu,\n author = \"Elgood, Zachary and Ortin, Tomas\",\n title = \"{T duality and Wald entropy formula in the Heterotic Superstring effective action at first-order in {\\ensuremath{\\alpha}}'}\",\n eprint = \"2005.11272\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-20-067\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP10(2020)097\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"10\",\n pages = \"097\",\n year = \"2020\",\n note = \"[Erratum: JHEP 06, 105 (2021)]\"\n}\n@article{Ortin:2020xdm,\n author = \"Ortin, Tomas\",\n title = \"{O(n, n) invariance and Wald entropy formula in the Heterotic Superstring effective action at first order in $\\alpha'$}\",\n eprint = \"2005.14618\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-th\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-20-073\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP01(2021)187\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"01\",\n pages = \"187\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Breckenridge:1996is,\n author = \"Breckenridge, J. C. and Myers, Robert C. and Peet, A. W. and Vafa, C.\",\n title = \"{D-branes and spinning black holes}\",\n eprint = \"hep-th/9602065\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"HUTP-96-A005, MCGILL-96-07, PUPT-1592\",\n doi = \"10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01460-8\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett. B\",\n volume = \"391\",\n pages = \"93--98\",\n year = \"1997\"\n}\n\n@phdthesis{RuiperezVicente:2020qfw,\n author = \"Ruip{\\'e}rez Vicente, Alejandro\",\n title = \"{Black holes in string theory with higher-derivative corrections}\",\n school = \"U. Autonoma, Madrid (main)\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Green:1984sg,\n author = \"Green, Michael B. and Schwarz, John H.\",\n title = \"{Anomaly Cancellation in Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory}\",\n reportNumber = \"CALT-68-1182\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0370-2693(84)91565-X\",\n journal = \"Phys. Lett. B\",\n volume = \"149\",\n pages = \"117--122\",\n year = \"1984\"\n}\n\n@article{Bergshoeff:1989de,\n author = \"Bergshoeff, E. A. and de Roo, M.\",\n title = \"{The Quartic Effective Action of the Heterotic String and Supersymmetry}\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-TH-5398-89\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0550-3213(89)90336-2\",\n journal = \"Nucl. Phys. B\",\n volume = \"328\",\n pages = \"439--468\",\n year = \"1989\"\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091188,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31988"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31988"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Benjamin Remy"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Benjamin Remy, Chihway Chang, Rebecca Willett"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Joint inference of weak lensing convergence map and cosmology with diffusion models"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"12 pages, 6 figures"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IM"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"We present a method for joint inference of cosmological parameters and convergence maps from weak lensing observations, targeting the full posterior conditioned on the observed shear field. Our approach uses implicit inference with diffusion models, learning the joint distribution from simulations, without the need to have an explicit and differentiable forward model for gradient-based MCMC sampling. We introduce a transformer-based architecture that operates in pixel space and treats cosmological parameters as additional tokens in a unified sequence, enabling efficient multimodal processing within a single network. At inference time, the trained model generates posterior samples of joint convergence maps and cosmological parameters conditioned on observed noisy shear fields. We demonstrate the method on simulated weak lensing data generated from log-normal fields in a wcdm cosmology. The model accurately reconstructs convergence maps and recovers cosmological posteriors that agree with traditional MCMC, while remaining well calibrated across the prior, with a MIRA calibration score of $0.635 \\pm 0.017$ on the joint posterior (where $0.667$ is optimal). The inferred fields reproduce the correct two-point statistics as well as non-Gaussian statistics such as the one-point distribution. This work establishes diffusion-based implicit inference as a viable route toward full field-level cosmological analyses, paving the way for applications to more realistic, non-differentiable simulators."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:25:45 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:25:45 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Remy","Benjamin",""],["Chang","Chihway",""],["Willett","Rebecca",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Remy\",\n \"Benjamin\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Chang\",\n \"Chihway\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Willett\",\n \"Rebecca\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: main_mnras.tex\n================================================\n% mnras_template.tex \n%\n% LaTeX template for creating an MNRAS paper\n%\n% v3.2 released 20 July 2023\n% (version numbers match those of mnras.cls)\n%\n% Copyright (C) Royal Astronomical Society 2015\n% Authors:\n% Keith T. Smith (Royal Astronomical Society)\n\n% Change log\n%\n% v3.2 July 2023\n%\tUpdated guidance on use of amssymb package\n% v3.0 May 2015\n% Renamed to match the new package name\n% Version number matches mnras.cls\n% A few minor tweaks to wording\n% v1.0 September 2013\n% Beta testing only - never publicly released\n% First version: a simple (ish) template for creating an MNRAS paper\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% Basic setup. Most papers should leave these options alone.\n\\documentclass[fleqn,usenatbib]{mnras}\n\n% MNRAS is set in Times font. If you don't have this installed (most LaTeX\n% installations will be fine) or prefer the old Computer Modern fonts, comment\n% out the following line\n\\usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}\n% Depending on your LaTeX fonts installation, you might get better results with one of these:\n%\\usepackage{mathptmx}\n%\\usepackage{txfonts}\n\n% Use vector fonts, so it zooms properly in on-screen viewing software\n% Don't change these lines unless you know what you are doing\n\\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\\usepackage{url}\n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{afterpage}\n\n\\usepackage{lineno}\n\n\\usepackage{bm}\n\\newcommand{\\thetab}{\\bm{\\theta}}\n\\newcommand{\\jade}{\\texttt{JADE}}\n\\newcommand{\\sbilens}{\\texttt{sbi\\_lens}}\n\\newcommand{\\wcdm}{\\textit{w}CDM}\n\\newcommand{\\ben}[1]{\\textcolor{cyan}{\\textbf{ben:} #1}}\n\\newcommand{\\vdag}{(v)^\\dagger}\n\\newcommand\\aastex{AAS\\TeX}\n\\newcommand\\latex{La\\TeX}\n\n\\newcommand{\\cc}{\\textcolor{orange}}\n\n\n% Allow \"Thomas van Noord\" and \"Simon de Laguarde\" and alike to be sorted by \"N\" and \"L\" etc. in the bibliography.\n% Write the name in the bibliography as \"\\VAN{Noord}{Van}{van} Noord, Thomas\"\n\\DeclareRobustCommand{\\VAN}[3]{#2}\n\\let\\VANthebibliography\\thebibliography\n\\def\\thebibliography{\\DeclareRobustCommand{\\VAN}[3]{##3}\\VANthebibliography}\n\n\n%%%%% AUTHORS - PLACE YOUR OWN PACKAGES HERE %%%%%\n\n% Only include extra packages if you really need them. Avoid using amssymb if newtxmath is enabled, as these packages can cause conflicts. newtxmatch covers the same math symbols while producing a consistent Times New Roman font. Common packages are:\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\t% Including figure files\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\t% Advanced maths commands\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n%%%%% AUTHORS - PLACE YOUR OWN COMMANDS HERE %%%%%\n\n% Please keep new commands to a minimum, and use \\newcommand not \\def to avoid\n% overwriting existing commands. Example:\n%\\newcommand{\\pcm}{\\,cm$^{-2}$}\t% per cm-squared\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TITLE PAGE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n% Title of the paper, and the short title which is used in the headers.\n% Keep the title short and informative.\n% \\title[Short title, max. 45 characters]{MNRAS \\LaTeXe\\ template -- title goes here}\n% \\title[Joint mass map and cosmology inference]{Joint inference of mass map and cosmology from weak lensing \\\\ cosmic shear with diffusion models}\n\\title[Joint convergence map and cosmology inference]{Joint inference of weak lensing convergence map and cosmology with diffusion models}\n% The list of authors, and the short list which is used in the headers.\n% If you need two or more lines of authors, add an extra line using \\newauthor\n% \\author[K. T. Smith et al.]{\n% Keith T. Smith,$^{1}$\\thanks{E-mail: publications@ras.ac.uk (KTS)}\n% A. N. Other,$^{2}$\n% Third Author$^{2,3}$\n% and Fourth Author$^{3}$\n\\author[B. Remy et al.]{\nBenjamin Remy,$^{1,2,}$\\thanks{E-mail: bremy@uchicago.edu}\nChihway Chang,$^{1,2,3}$\nRebecca Willett$^{1,4,5}$\n\\\\\n% List of institutions\n% $^{1}$Royal Astronomical Society, Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BQ, UK\\\\\n% $^{2}$Department, Institution, Street Address, City Postal Code, Country\\\\\n% $^{3}$Another Department, Different Institution, Street Address, City Postal Code, Country\n% }\n$^{1}$NSF-Simons AI Institute for the Sky (SkAI), 172 E. Chestnut St., Chicago, IL 60611, USA\\\\\n$^{2}$Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA\\\\\n$^{3}$Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA\\\\\n$^{4}$Department of Statistics, University\nof Chicago, USA\\\\\n$^{5}$Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago, USA\\\\\n% $^{6}$Data Science Institute, University of Chicago, USA\n}\n\n\n% These dates will be filled out by the publisher\n\\date{Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ}\n\n% Enter the current year, for the copyright statements etc.\n\\pubyear{2026}\n\n% Don't change these lines\n\\begin{document}\n\\label{firstpage}\n\\pagerange{\\pageref{firstpage}--\\pageref{lastpage}}\n\\maketitle\n\n% Abstract of the paper\n\\begin{abstract}\nWe present a method for joint inference of cosmological parameters and convergence maps from weak lensing observations, targeting the full posterior conditioned on the observed shear field. \nOur approach uses implicit inference \nwith diffusion models, learning the joint distribution from simulations, without the need to have an explicit and differentiable forward model for gradient-based MCMC sampling. We introduce a transformer-based architecture that operates in pixel space and treats cosmological parameters as additional tokens in a unified sequence, enabling efficient multimodal processing within a single network. At inference time, the trained model generates posterior samples of joint convergence maps and cosmological parameters conditioned on observed noisy shear fields.\nWe demonstrate the method on simulated weak lensing data generated from log-normal fields in a \\wcdm\\ cosmology. The model accurately reconstructs convergence maps and recovers cosmological posteriors that agree with traditional MCMC, while remaining well calibrated across the prior, with a MIRA calibration score of $0.635 \\pm 0.017$ on the joint posterior (where $0.667$ is optimal). The inferred fields reproduce the correct two-point statistics as well as non-Gaussian statistics such as the one-point distribution. This work establishes diffusion-based implicit inference as a viable route toward full field-level cosmological analyses, paving the way for applications to more realistic, non-differentiable simulators.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n% Select between one and six entries from the list of approved keywords.\n% Don't make up new ones.\n\\begin{keywords}\ncosmology -- gravitational lensing -- Bayesian inference\n\\end{keywords}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% BODY OF PAPER %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n% \\linenumbers\n\n\\section{Introduction}\nOngoing and upcoming Stage-IV galaxy surveys, including DESI \\citep{aghamousa2016desi}, Euclid \\citep{laureijs2011euclid}, the Vera C. Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time \\citep[LSST,][]{ivezic2019lsst} and the Roman Space Telescope's High-Latitude Wide-Area Survey \\citep[HLWAS,][]{spergel2015wide} will map the large-scale structure of the Universe with unprecedented precision. Harnessing the full potential of these datasets requires analysis methods capable of exploiting all available information, particularly on small, non-linear scales where a vast number of observable modes carry significant constraining power on cosmological parameters.\n\nWeak gravitational lensing, the subtle coherent distortions of galaxy shapes caused by the gravitational potential of the large-scale structure, is one of the most powerful probes of cosmology \\citep{Mandelbaum2018}. Traditional cosmological analyses rely on summary statistics, primarily the two-point correlation function of galaxy shapes, to extract cosmological information from lensing surveys. While highly successful, e.g. analyses from DECADE+DES\nY3 \\citep{anbajagane2025dark}, KiDS-Legacy \\citep{wright2025kids}, HSC Y3 \\citep{li2023hyper}, these approaches are known to discard information contained in the non-Gaussian features of the matter distribution, particularly on small scales where nonlinear structure formation generates rich higher-order correlations.\n\n\nTo go beyond the two-point function and access the non-Gaussian information present in weak lensing data, a variety of higher-order statistics have been developed. These include peak counts, wavelet and scattering transforms, Minkowski functionals, moments, and three-point statistics \\citep[see e.g.][and references therein]{ajani2020constraining,cheng2020new,liu2019constraining,kratochvil2012probing,takada2004cosmological}. These approaches have been shown to tighten cosmological constraints relative to two-point analyses alone. However, any fixed set of summary statistics inevitably leaves some fraction of the available information unexploited. Full-field approaches, which operate directly on the observed maps rather than compressing them into predefined summaries, offer a principled way to capture all statistical information simultaneously.\n\nOne line of work uses neural networks to perform full-field cosmological inference directly from weak lensing maps, learning near sufficient compressed summaries of the field from which the cosmological posterior is then sampled \\citep{jeffrey2021likelihood, Lanzieri_2025, jeffrey2025dark, thomsen2025dark}.\nThese methods can in principle capture all statistical information present in the observations, including non-Gaussian signatures, thereby reducing uncertainties on cosmological parameters beyond what analytical summary statistics alone can achieve. However, they marginalize over the underlying convergence field rather than reconstructing it, so the map itself is not recovered as part of the inference. \n\nA separate line of work, also based on neural networks, instead targets field reconstruction in isolation. mass mapping methods \\citep{remy2023probabilistic} aim to recover the convergence field from noisy shear measurements, and analogous approaches have been developed for reconstructing initial conditions from late-time tracers \\citep{legin2024posterior, Doeser_2025}. These methods treat the inverse problem on its own, with cosmological parameters held fixed rather than jointly inferred. Most existing neural network based methods thus address either the reconstruction or the inference problem while holding the other fixed, or resort to marginalization.\n\nIn this paper, we introduce \\texttt{JADE}\\footnote{\\url{https://github.com/b-remy/jade}} (Joint Architecture for fielD and cosmological parameter Estimation), an alternative approach based on implicit inference, in which we learn a conditional diffusion model that directly samples from the posterior distribution of physical fields and cosmological parameters, conditioned on the observed data. Rather than requiring a differentiable forward model and MCMC sampling, our method learns this conditional distribution directly from simulations, allowing for arbitrarily complex cosmological simulators. This enables both mass map reconstruction and cosmological parameter inference in a single, unified framework. Related to this work, \\cite{cuesta2024joint} developed a joint inference pipeline combining two separate generative models, one for inferring the initial density field, and the other for the cosmological parameters. While we could use this approach to sample from our target joint distribution between the convergence and cosmology, we propose a method that learns the joint posterior with a single conditional diffusion model. We demonstrate that this implicit approach can recover accurate posterior distributions over both the convergence field and cosmological parameters, opening the door to full-field analyses with realistic, non-differentiable simulators.\n\nThe paper is organized as follow: in Section~\\ref{sec:weak-lensing} we recall how weak lensing serve as a cosmological probe and how we mocked convergence fields with log-normal simulations, in Section~\\ref{sec:method} we present our diffusion model framework and our transformer architecture for joint inference of cosmology and mass maps, and in Section~\\ref{sec:dataset} we describe the simulation setting we used to train our diffusion model, and we present the results of joint inference in Section~\\ref{sec:results}. We conclude in Section~\\ref{sec:discussion}.\n\n\\section{Weak gravitational lensing}\\label{sec:weak-lensing}\n\n\\subsection{Primer on convergence and shear}\n\nThe large-scale structures of the matter distribution deflect the paths of photons emitted by distant galaxies due to their gravitational potential, inducing\nsubtle but coherent distortions in their observed shapes. With this effect being faint, we call it the weak regime of gravitational lensing, or weak lensing. These distortions are described by two quantities: the convergence $\\kappa$, which corresponds to an isotropic magnification of galaxy images, and the shear $\\gamma=\\gamma_1 + i \\gamma_2$, which produces anisotropic stretching.\n\nThe convergence is directly related to the projected matter density, or mass, along the line of sight. As such, a map of the convergence field is often referred to as a \\textit{mass map}. For a population of source galaxies distributed in redshift according to a density $n(z)$, $\\kappa$ can be written as a weighted integral of the three-dimensional matter overdensity $\\delta$ over the comoving distance $\\chi$,\n\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:convergence}\n \\kappa(\\bm{\\vartheta}) = \\frac{3H_0\\Omega_m}{2c^2}\\int^{\\chi_\\text{lim}}_0 d\\chi\\frac{q(\\chi)}{a(\\chi)}f_{K}(\\chi)\\delta(f_K(\\chi)\\bm{\\vartheta}, \\chi),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\bm{\\vartheta}$ is the angular coordinate on the sky, $H_0$ is the Hubble constant, $\\Omega_m$ the matter density parameter, $a(\\chi)$ the scale factor, $f_K$ the comoving angular diameter distance, and $q(\\chi) = \\int^{\\inf}_\\chi d\\chi^\\prime n(\\chi^\\prime) f_K(\\chi^\\prime - \\chi)/f_K(\\chi^\\prime)$ is the lensing efficiency kernel. This expression also makes it explicit that the convergence field depends on cosmological parameters governing the geometry and growth of structure \\citep{Kilbinger2015}.\n\nWhile convergence encodes the projected mass, it is not directly observable. In practice, we measure shear, which can be estimated from the ellipticities of galaxies. \n\nBoth the convergence and shear are obtained from the lensing potential $\\psi$ as second derivatives. Adopting the flat-sky approximation, in which the survey patch is treated as a plane with Cartesian coordinates, these take the form\n\\begin{equation}\n \\kappa = \\frac{1}{2}\\Delta\\psi \\; , \\; \\gamma_1 = \\frac{1}{2}(\\partial_1^2\\psi - \\partial_2^2\\psi) \\; , \\; \\gamma_2 = \\partial_1\\partial_2\\psi,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\Delta = \\partial_1^2 + \\partial_2^2$. In the same approximation, we can convert between them through the following relation in Fourier space \\citep{Kaiser1993}\n\\begin{align}\n \\tilde{\\kappa}_E + i\\tilde{\\kappa}_B &= \\left(\\frac{k_1^2 - k_2^2}{k^2} + i\\frac{2k_1 k_2}{k^2}\\right) \\left(\\tilde{\\gamma}_1 + i\\tilde{\\gamma}_2\\right) \\nonumber \\\\\n &= \\mathbf{P} \\left(\\tilde{\\gamma}_1 + i\\tilde{\\gamma}_2\\right),\n\\end{align}\nwhere $\\kappa_E$ and $\\kappa_B$ are the E- and B-modes of the convergence, and a tilde denotes the Fourier transform. The forward model relating the convergence to the observed noisy shear is therefore\n\\begin{equation}\n \\gamma_\\text{obs} = \\mathbf{F}^{-1}\\mathbf{P^\\dagger F}\\kappa + n,\n\\end{equation}\nwith $\\mathbf{F}$ the Fourier operator, $\\mathbf{P}^\\dagger$ the Hermitian conjugate of $\\mathbf{P}$, and $n\\sim\\mathcal{N}(0,\\Sigma_n)$ the shape noise. \n\n\\subsection{Log-normal mass maps}\\label{sec:log-normal}\n\nTo test our pipeline, we need to generate a large number of weak lensing convergence maps to train the diffusion model. There is a wide spectrum of methods that one can adopt to generate these maps ranging from N-body simulations, e.g. the Gower street simulations \\citep{jeffrey2025dark} or the CosmoGrid simulations \\citep{kacprzak2023cosmogridv1}, to simple Gaussian maps given a power spectrum \\citep{xavier2016flask, tessore2023glass}. In this paper, we take an intermediate approach and simulate convergence maps with a 2-dimensional log-normal model \\citep{coles1991lognormal}. \n\nThe log-normal field is a phenomenological model for the convergence, which has been demonstrated to be able to mock the non-linear growth of structures \\citep{Xavier_2016, clerkin}. While log-normal fields do not fully replicate the complexity of N-body simulations, particularly at small scales, they are very fast to generate and embed non-Gaussian information in the fields, making them very useful for demonstrating novel field-level inference methods. We refer the reader to \\cite{Lanzieri_2025} and \\cite{Zeghal_2025} for an in-depth description of the efficient generation of log-normal fields, and only outline its main steps here. \n\nFirst, a Gaussian random field $\\kappa_\\text{GRF}$ is generated with the expected convergence non-linear power spectrum, and with expected cross-correlations across redshift bins. Then this field is exponentiated and shifted with a parameter $\\lambda$, generating a log-normal field $\\kappa_\\text{LN}$ such that\n\\begin{equation}\n \\kappa_\\text{LN} = e^{\\kappa_\\text{GRF}} - \\lambda(z, \\theta).\n\\end{equation}\nBecause the exponentiation changes the pixel correlations, the field needs to be normalized so that it matches the expected correlation function. Typically, we construct the correlation function of $\\kappa_\\text{GRF}$ such that its transformation into a log-normal field yields correlation functions that reproduce the theoretical predictions. The shift parameter $\\lambda$ is determined from perturbation theory calculations, using the \\texttt{CosMomentum} code \\citep{friedrich2020primordial}, to ensure the log-normal field reproduces the correct skewness. The dependency on cosmology and redshift of the shift parameter induces information in the fields beyond the power spectrum, hence the presence of non-Gaussian information.\n\nWhile applying our method to real data will ultimately require training on N-body simulations, the log-normal model is sufficient for the purposes of this work as it provides a fast, controllable forward model that produces fields with realistic non-Gaussian structure, allowing us to develop and test the joint inference framework before scaling to more expensive simulators.\n\n\\section{Methods} \\label{sec:method}\n\nIn this section, we provide an overview of field-level inference and where our approach stands in Section~\\ref{sec:field-level}. Next, we describe our diffusion model framework in Section~\\ref{sec:diffusion-model} and our proposed neural network architecture in Section~\\ref{sec:jade}. We finally explain how to condition the inference on observed fields in Section~\\ref{sec:amortized-posterior}.\n\n\\subsection{Field-level inference}\\label{sec:field-level}\nIn the context of weak lensing, field-level inference is formulated as a forward modeling problem: starting from cosmological parameters $\\theta$ and initial condition over-densities $\\delta_\\text{IC}$, a physical model predicts the convergence field $\\kappa$, from which the observed noisy shear field $\\gamma_\\text{obs}$ is generated. The goal is then to infer a posterior that jointly constrains the cosmology and one or more of these underlying fields.\n\nA prominent example is the Bayesian Origin Reconstruction from Galaxies framework \\citep[BORG,][]{jasche2013bayesian, lavaux2019systematicfreeinferencecosmicmatter}, which targets the joint posterior over cosmological parameters and initial conditions, $p(\\theta, \\delta_\\text{IC} \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$, by sampling within a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) framework. This formulation has shown promise for inferring cosmological parameters such as ($\\Omega_m$, $\\sigma_8$) \\citep{porqueres2023fieldlevelinferencecosmicshear}, primordial non-Gaussianity \\citep{chen2024probing, andrews2023bayesian}, and BAO parameters \\citep{bayer2026field}. Beyond its role in constraining cosmology, reconstructing the initial conditions has independent scientific value: when coupled with a forward model, the recovered initial density field can be used to predict fields that are not directly observable, such as the late-time matter density field, the convergence map, or the detailed structure of the cosmic web, like clusters, filaments, and voids, providing observational access to quantities that have traditionally been studied only through simulations. It also enables direct validation of the assumed cosmological model through posterior predictive checks. However, these approaches rely on \\textit{explicit inference}: they require a differentiable forward model linking the initial conditions to observables, which limits the complexity of the physics that can be employed, and they sample the posterior using MCMC, which faces well-known challenges in the high-dimensional spaces characteristic of field-level inference. Gradient-based samplers such as Hamiltonian Monte Carlo \\citep[HMC;][]{radford2021learningtransferablevisualmodels, betancourt2018conceptualintroductionhamiltonianmonte} can accelerate the sampling when a differentiable forward model is available, but do not lift the underlying restrictions on model complexity. \\citet{omori2026practicalfieldlevelinferenceweak} shows that sampling 3D initial conditions from observing the 2D cosmic shear field is particularly challenging when using particle-mesh solvers, and is feasible only with careful preconditioning of the sampler.\n\nThe second strategy, known as \\textit{implicit inference}, bypasses the need for an explicit likelihood and a differentiable forward model by using generative models trained on simulations to learn the relationship between observations and parameters directly from simulations.\n\nA further distinction concerns what is being inferred. \\textit{Marginal inference} targets the cosmological posterior $p(\\theta \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs}) = \\int p(\\theta, \\kappa \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})\\, \\mathrm{d}\\kappa$, integrating out the field and providing constraints on cosmological parameters only. \\textit{Joint inference}, on the other hand, targets the full posterior $p(\\theta, \\kappa \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$, simultaneously constraining the cosmology and reconstructing the convergence field. Implicit inference methods have been explored for weak lensing \\citep{Jeffrey_2020, Lanzieri_2025, jeffrey2025dark, thomsen2025dark}, but existing approaches all target the marginal posterior and do not provide an estimate of the convergence field.\n\nOur method falls within the implicit inference framework, but unlike previous work, we target the full joint posterior $p(\\theta, \\kappa \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$, enabling both cosmological parameter inference and convergence field reconstruction within a single model. We choose to infer the convergence field as a first step to demonstrate our approach, as inferring jointly the initial conditions and cosmology $p(\\theta, \\delta_\\text{IC} \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$ is more challenging, as one needs to infer a 3D field from a 2D observed field. Future work will extend our proposed architecture to the joint inference of initial conditions and cosmological parameters.\n\n\\subsection{Diffusion models} \\label{sec:diffusion-model}\n\n\n\\begin{figure*}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.8\\linewidth]{assets/figure_jade_shear_v2.pdf}\n \\caption{Joint field and cosmological denoising transformer architecture inputs a noisy convergence map, noisy cosmological parameters, and observed shear field, and outputs denoised field and cosmology (hat denotes estimated variable). Fields are first patched and then linearly projected into embedding vectors, and summed to their positional encoding. Time embedding modulates each transformer block.\n}\n \\label{fig:jade}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\nThe first step of our pipeline concerns learning the joint distribution $p(\\kappa, \\theta)$ with a diffusion model.\nFor simplicity, we introduce a joint variable $x = [\\theta, \\kappa]$. Diffusion models \\citep{ho2020denoisingdiffusionprobabilisticmodels, song2021scorebasedgenerativemodelingstochastic} and flow models \\citep{lipman2023flowmatchinggenerativemodeling} are generative models that map a base distribution $p_0$, such as a multivariate Gaussian, to a target distribution $p_1$. Diffusion and flow models differ in their specific training and sampling procedure, but are fundamentally the same generative model framework as unified in \\cite{albergo2023stochastic}, so we interchangeably use diffusion and flow in this paper. Here, we adopt the flow matching framework where we introduce a noisy variable $x_t = tx_1 + (1-t)x_0$, which linearly interpolates between the base and the target distribution, and where the generation is performed by sampling from the base distribution $x_0 \\sim p_0$ and solving the ordinary differential equation (ODE)\n\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:ode}\n \\dfrac{dx_t}{dt} = v_t(x_t),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $v_t$ is called the marginal velocity field and can be estimated with a neural network $v_\\varphi(x_t, t)$, parameterized by weights $\\varphi$. The marginal velocity field $v_t(x_t)$ is generally intractable, but flow matching provides a tractable way to learn it. The key idea is to introduce a conditional velocity field $v_t(x_t\\mid x_0,x_1)$, i.e. conditioned on the initial and final state of the trajectory, that we get by differentiating the interpolant such as\n\n\\begin{equation}\n v_t(x_t\\mid x_0, x_1) = \\frac{dx_t}{dt} = x_1 - x_0.\n\\end{equation}\n\nThe flow matching objective is then a regression loss with respect to this velocity field, such that for a neural network $v_\\varphi$ we need to minimize the mean squared error loss\n\n\\begin{align}\\label{eq:loss-velocity}\n \\mathcal{L}(\\varphi) \n & =\\mathbb{E}_{p(t)p(x_1)p(x_0)} \\left[ \\| v_\\varphi(x_t, t) - v_t(x_t\\mid x_0, x_1) \\|^2 \\right] \\nonumber \\\\\n &= \\mathbb{E}_{p(t)p(x_1)p(x_0)} \\left[ \\| v_\\varphi(x_t, t) - (x_1 - x_0) \\|^2 \\right],\n\\end{align}\nwhere $t\\sim p(t)$ is the time distribution during training. This loss is being minimized when $v_\\varphi$ equals the conditional expectation $\\mathbb{E}_{p(x_0,x_1\\mid x_t)}\\left[ v_t(x_t\\mid x_0, x_1) \\right] = v_t(x_t)$, which is exactly the marginal velocity field.\nAlternative objectives have been proposed for this task \\citep{ho2020denoisingdiffusionprobabilisticmodels, song2021scorebasedgenerativemodelingstochastic, albergo2023stochastic}, and in particular \\cite{li2026basicsletdenoisinggenerative} showed that while the different objectives, including \\autoref{eq:loss-velocity}, lead to equivalent performance, parameterizing the neural network so that it predicts the denoised sample directly instead of the velocity can substantially improve the performance. To this end, we introduce a denoiser $d_\\varphi(x_t, t)$, and parameterize the velocity field such that\n\n\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:velocity-denoiser}\n v_\\varphi(x_t, t) = \\dfrac{d_\\varphi(x_t, t) - x_t}{1 - t}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nNote that this expression is not defined for $t=1$, so we clip the denominator with a strictly positive value following \\cite{li2026basicsletdenoisinggenerative}. The loss function expressed in term of the denoiser can be found in \\autoref{eq:jade-loss}. The motivation for the denoiser parameterization relates to the low-dimensional manifold structure of physical data. Convergence fields, like natural images, occupy a low-dimensional manifold within the ambient pixel space. Predicting a noised quantity like the velocity $v = x_1 - x_0$ requires the network to faithfully represent signals that span the full ambient space, placing heavy demands on network capacity, particularly for large patch sizes. Predicting the clean sample $x_1$ instead allows the network to focus on the manifold structure of the data, which is a considerably easier task. As demonstrated by \\cite{li2026basicsletdenoisinggenerative}, this distinction goes beyond a simple reweighting of the loss: direct velocity or noise prediction can break down entirely in high-dimensional settings, whereas clean-sample prediction remains effective even with limited network width.\n\n\nThe framework described above is general as it defines how to learn and sample from a high-dimensional distribution using a neural network that parameterizes the velocity field. What remains to be specified is the architecture of this neural network, which must be able to operate jointly on both the convergence field $\\kappa$ and the cosmological parameters $\\theta$. We address this in the next section.\n\n\n\\subsection{A transformer architecture for field and parameters inference} \\label{sec:jade}\n\nAs we aim to learn the joint distribution $p(\\kappa, \\theta)$, we need an architecture which takes both $\\kappa$ and $\\theta$ as input and produces both as output. The usual architecture used for diffusion models involving images or volumes is the U-Net \\citep{ronneberger2015unetconvolutionalnetworksbiomedical} thanks to the efficiency of convolutional layers. While this architecture has been widely used for astrophysical application \\citep{remy2023probabilistic, adam2022posterior, legin2024posterior}, it is not convenient to work with cosmological parameters as well. Transformer-based architectures \\citep{vaswani2023attentionneed} however, initially developed for text, have recently demonstrated equivalent performances for images \\citep{dosovitskiy2021imageworth16x16words} and multimodal data \\citep{radford2021learningtransferablevisualmodels}. They have already been used for multimodal tasks in astrophysics \\citep{parker2025aion1omnimodalfoundationmodel}. Transformer architectures along with diffusion models have also been used in the context of simulation-based inference to model joint and arbitrary conditional distributions in \\citep{gloeckler2024all}.\n\n\nWe introduce \\texttt{JADE}, a Joint Architecture for fielDs and cosmological parameter Estimation. It is a pixel-space vision transformer augmented with cosmological information. \\cite{li2026basicsletdenoisinggenerative} recently demonstrated that vision transformers can be designed to implement diffusion models directly in pixel space, rather than in an autoencoder’s latent space \\citep[e.g. diffusion transformers][]{peebles2023scalable}. Moreover, operating directly in pixel space removes the need to train an additional autoencoder alongside the diffusion model, simplifying the overall training pipeline.\n\nOur architecture is built from the JiT (Just image Transformer) architecture presented in \\cite{li2026basicsletdenoisinggenerative} for pixel-space image diffusion. The input image is decomposed into patches, and each patch is projected into an embedding representation by a linear transformation. These embedding vectors, also called tokens, are summed with the patches positional embedding. This creates a sequence of tokens which are processed by several transformer blocks, returning another sequence which is finally projected back into patches with a linear layer called the predictor. \n\nBecause we need our neural network to operate jointly on a field and on cosmological parameters, we similarly project the six parameters to cosmological embeddings of the same dimension as the patches, which we concatenate to the sequence of patch embeddings. This way, the cosmological information is just another token the transformer has to process. We use different projector and predictor layers for the cosmology and for the field patches because they do not represent the same modality, but the transformer blocks are shared. See \\autoref{fig:jade} for an illustration of the architecture.\n\nAccording to the denoiser parameterization described in Section~\\ref{sec:jade}, the model takes as input both the noisy field $\\kappa_t$ and the noisy cosmology $\\theta_t$ and predicts the denoised field and cosmology. The model is also conditioned on the time $t$, providing information on the amount of noise. Further details on the architecture, such as conditioning strategy, patch sizes, transformer blocks, can be found in Appendix~\\ref{sec:architecture}.\n\nOnce trained, the denoiser can be turned into a velocity field estimator with \\autoref{eq:velocity-denoiser} and the unconditional distribution $p(\\kappa, \\theta)$ can be sampled jointly by sampling random fields $\\kappa_0\\sim \\mathcal{N}(0, I_{d\\times d})$ and parameters $\\theta_0\\sim \\mathcal{N}(0, I_6)$, and solving \\autoref{eq:ode}.\n\n\\subsection{Amortized joint posterior inference} \\label{sec:amortized-posterior}\n\nThe diffusion model described above learns the unconditional joint distribution $p(\\kappa, \\theta)$. In practice, however, we wish to condition on an observed noisy shear field $\\gamma_\\text{obs}$ and sample from the posterior $p(\\kappa, \\theta \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$. We now describe how \\jade\\ can be extended to perform this conditional sampling in a fully amortized fashion, producing posterior samples for any new observation without retraining.\n\nSampling a conditional distribution with a diffusion model requires conditioning the velocity field on the observation, yielding $v_\\varphi(\\kappa_t, \\theta_t, t, \\gamma_\\text{obs})$. With \\jade, conditioning on an observed field is architecturally straightforward, because the observed field can be processed in the same way as the sampled field. The observed field $\\gamma_\\text{obs}$ is also split into patches, which are projected into embeddings by a dedicated linear projector, combined with positional embeddings, and concatenated to the existing sequence of target field and cosmology tokens. The full sequence is then processed jointly by the shared transformer blocks. The output tokens corresponding to the conditioning input are discarded, as they are not constrained during training and carry no physical meaning. The transformer's attention mechanism therefore provides a natural and flexible way to incorporate the conditioning information: each target token, whether a field patch or the cosmology, can attend to the observed shear at all spatial positions, allowing the model to learn which features of the data are informative for each component of the posterior.\n\nA practical advantage of this design is that the conditioning input does not require the same patch resolution as the target field. Because the observed shear $\\gamma_\\text{obs}$ is contaminated by shape noise, small-scale information is suppressed compared to the noiseless convergence map that the model aims to reconstruct. We can therefore use a bigger patch size for the conditioning input, incurring negligible information loss while reducing the sequence length and the computational cost of the self-attention operations.\n\nThe conditional model is trained with the same flow matching objective as the unconditional model (\\autoref{eq:loss-velocity}), with the only difference that the velocity field is now also conditioned on $\\gamma_\\text{obs}$. At each training step, a triplet $(\\theta, \\kappa, \\gamma_\\text{obs})$ is drawn from the forward model, the noisy interpolants $\\kappa_t$ and $\\theta_t$ are constructed as before, and the denoiser is trained to predict the clean samples given both the noisy state and the observed shear. Once trained, posterior samples ($\\theta, \\kappa) \\sim p(\\theta, \\kappa \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$ are obtained by initializing from Gaussian noise and integrating the conditional ODE, now with the observation $\\gamma_\\text{obs}$ provided as a fixed input at every integration step.\n\nBecause the conditioning is handled at the architecture level rather than through an explicit likelihood, the model learns the full data-to-posterior mapping directly from simulations. This makes the approach fully amortized: a single trained model can be applied to any observed shear field without additional optimization or sampling. As for the unconditional model, no differentiable forward model is required at any stage, but only the ability to generate training triplets $(\\theta, \\kappa, \\gamma_\\text{obs})$ from the simulator.\n\n\\section{Training on LSST Y10 weak lensing maps} \\label{sec:dataset}\n\nSimilarly to \\cite{Lanzieri_2025, Zeghal_2025}, we simulate the convergence field of a small patch of the sky as seen at LSST Y10 resolution from a \\wcdm\\, model using the \\texttt{sbi\\_lens}\\footnote{\\url{https://github.com/DifferentiableUniverseInitiative/sbi_lens}} library. The \\wcdm\\, cosmological model is described by six parameters $\\theta=(\\Omega_c, \\Omega_b, \\sigma_8, h_0, n_s, w_0)$, namely the cold dark matter and baryon density parameters, the amplitude of matter fluctuations at 8 $h^{-1}$Mpc scales, the dimensionless Hubble parameter, the spectral index, and the dark energy equation-of-state parameter. The total matter density entering the convergence in Equation~\\ref{eq:convergence} is then $\\Omega_m = \\Omega_c + \\Omega_b$. Priors distribution and the fiducial values we used for this work are the same as in \\cite{Lanzieri_2025}, and recalled in Table~\\ref{tab:priors}.\n\n\\begin{table}\n\n\t\\begin{center}\n \t\\begin{tabular}{lcc} \n \t\t\\hline \\hline\n \t\tParameter & Prior & Fiducial value \\\\\n \t\t$\\Omega_c$ & $\\mathcal{N}_{[0, \\cdot)}$ (0.2664, 0.2) & 0.2664 \\\\\n \t\t$\\Omega_b$ & $\\mathcal{N}$ (0.0492, 0.006) & 0.0492 \\\\\n \t\t$\\sigma_8$ & $\\mathcal{N}$ (0.831, 0.14) & 0.831 \\\\\n \t\t$h_0$ & $\\mathcal{N}$ (0.6727, 0.063) & 0.6727\\\\\n \t\t$n_s$ & $\\mathcal{N}$ (0.9645, 0.08) & 0.9645 \\\\\n \t\t$w_{0}$ & $\\mathcal{N}_{[-2,-0.3 ]}$ (-1.0, 0.9) & -1.0 \\\\\n \t\t\\hline\n \t\\end{tabular}\n \\caption{Parameters, priors and fiducial values used for our weak lensing simulations. $\\mathcal{N}_\\text{[a, b]}$ denotes a normal distribution truncated on the interval $\\text{[a, b]}$.}\n\t \\label{tab:priors}\n \\end{center}\n\\end{table}\n\n\n\nThe Vera C. Rubin Observatory's LSST \\citep{ivezic2019lsst} is a next-generation galaxy survey that will image billions of galaxies over ten years, making it one of the most powerful weak lensing datasets to date. We adopt the Y10 configuration, corresponding to the full survey depth. The distribution of the source redshift bins is parameterized by a Smail distribution \n $n(z) \\propto z^2 e^{-(z/z_0)^{\\alpha}}$ \\citep{smail1995deep}, with $z_0=0.11$, $\\alpha=0.68$. We also consider a systematic uncertainty on the redshift with a bias parameter $\\sigma_z = 0.05(1+z)$. All our fields are spatially binned into $128\\times 128$ pixels, spanning a $5\\times 5 \\deg^2$ area, with a pixel resolution of 2.34 arcmin/pixel.\n\nThe shape noise per pixel in each tomographic bin is determined by the intrinsic ellipticity dispersion $\\sigma_e = 0.26$ and the galaxy number density. Each of the 5 tomographic bins has an effective density of $\\bar{n} = 27 \\, \\mathrm{arcmin}^{-2}$, yielding a per-pixel noise standard deviation of\n\\begin{equation}\n \\sigma_{\\mathrm{pix}} = \\frac{\\sigma_e}{\\sqrt{\\bar{n} \\, A_{\\mathrm{pix}}}},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $A_{\\mathrm{pix}} = (5 \\times 60 / 128)^2 \\approx 5.49 \\, \\mathrm{arcmin}^2$ is the pixel area, which corresponds to averaging over approximately 148 galaxies per pixel.\n\n\\medskip\n\nWe trained \\jade\\, on 100,000 independent draws of $(\\theta, \\kappa, \\gamma_\\text{obs})$, from the forward model. Training is performed on a single NVIDIA GH200 GPU with 96\\,GB of VRAM, using a batch size of 128 for 750 epochs, completing in approximately 48 hours. Once trained, generating a single joint posterior sample $(\\theta, \\kappa) \\sim p(\\theta, \\kappa \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$ takes approximately 0.2 seconds, corresponding to the 256 ODE integration steps listed in \\autoref{tab:placeholder}. Drawing 1,000 posterior samples for a given observation therefore requires roughly 3 minutes of wall-clock time. In the following section, we compare the posterior obtained with our \\jade\\, diffusion model and with the No-U-Turn Sampler \\citep[NUTS;][]{hoffman2011nouturnsampleradaptivelysetting}. We run 10 NUTS chains in parallel, initialized at the field and cosmology ground truths, with 500 warmup steps and 3 000 sampling steps per chain, with a maximum tree depth of 6, allowing up to $2^{6}-1 = 63$ leapfrog steps per iteration, and an initial step size of $10^{-2}$. In practice the sampler saturated the maximum tree depth at essentially every iteration, averaging $62.3$ leapfrog steps\nper sample. Across the 10 chains this amounts to $2.18\\times10^{6}$ total gradient evaluations, or equivalently $4.36\\times10^{6}$ simulation calls (two per gradient) for evaluating the gradients via automatic differentiation. This is of similar order of magnitude as the sampling benchmark in \\citet{Zeghal_2025}, and one order of magnitude more than what we used to train our implicit joint posterior model \\jade.\n\n\\section{Results} \\label{sec:results}\n\nWe now present our results on joint posterior sampling from the conditional model $p(\\theta, \\kappa \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$, and verify both the quality of the reconstructed convergence fields and the recovered cosmological constraints.\n\n\\begin{figure*}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1\\linewidth]{assets/joint_posterior_samples.pdf}\n \\caption{The first row shows the 5 bins of the observed convergence $\\kappa_\\text{obs}=\\mathbf{F}\\mathbf{P F^{-1}}\\gamma_\\text{obs}$, i.e. the Kaiser-Squires transformation of the observed shear field. The second row shows ground truth convergence and cosmology behind the noise. The third and fourth rows show posterior cosmology and convergence field, jointly sampled with our conditional diffusion model $(\\theta, \\kappa) \\sim p_\\varphi(\\theta, \\kappa \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$.}\n \\label{fig:field-posterior}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\nWe trained a conditional $\\texttt{JADE}$ model, learning directly $p(\\theta, \\kappa \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$ . The architecture and hyperparameters are detailed in appendix \\ref{sec:architecture}.\n\n\\subsection{Posterior samples validation}\n\\autoref{fig:field-posterior} shows joint posterior samples of the cosmological parameters and convergence maps, conditioned on a single noisy shear observation. The observed shear is visibly noisy, yet the posterior samples recover the structures of the ground-truth convergence field, while correctly reflecting the residual uncertainty on small scales.\n\nIn order to verify that the reconstructed convergence fields are statistically consistent with the jointly sampled cosmology, we perform two types of checks. For each posterior sample $(\\theta^{(i)}, \\kappa^{(i)})$, we generate an independent simulation $\\kappa_\\text{sim}$ from the forward model at the sampled cosmology $\\theta^{(i)}$ and compare summary statistics between $\\kappa^{(i)}$ and $\\kappa_\\text{sim}$. \\autoref{fig:posterior-power-spectra} shows that the auto- and cross- power spectra of the posterior samples match, sample by sample, those of independent simulations drawn at the corresponding $\\theta^{(i)}$ across all tomographic redshift bin combinations. To quantify the overall spectral accuracy, we also compare the mean power spectrum averaged over many ground-truth convergence fields to the mean averaged over posterior samples across multiple observations. We compute the relative error between these aggregates by computing the following ratio $(\\overline{\\mathcal{C}}_{\\ell, \\text{posterior}}-\\overline{\\mathcal{C}}_{\\ell, \\text{simulation}})/\\overline{\\mathcal{C}}_{\\ell, \\text{simulation}}$. This aggregate comparison yields a relative error of $6.7\\%$ averaged over all redshift bins and scales.\n\nAt the pixel level, we verify that the posterior samples are consistent with the observed data by computing the reduced chi-squared statistic\n\\begin{equation}\n \\chi^2_\\text{red} = \\frac{1}{N_\\text{pix}} \\sum_{i,j=1}^{128} \\sum_{z=1}^{5} \\left( \\frac{\\gamma_{\\text{obs},ijz} - \\kappa^{(s)}_{ijz}}{\\sigma_{\\text{lsst},z}} \\right)^2,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $N_\\text{pix} = 128 \\times 128 \\times 5 = 81920$ and $\\sigma_{\\text{lsst},z}$ is the per-bin noise standard deviation. If the posterior samples faithfully reconstruct the convergence field, the residual between the observation and a posterior sample should be dominated by the injected shape noise, yielding $\\chi^2_\\text{red} \\approx 1$. Averaged over 1000 posterior samples, we obtain $\\chi^2_\\text{red} = 1.0024$, consistent with the expected value of $1.0000 \\pm 0.0049$, confirming that the residuals are statistically indistinguishable from the noise.\n\nWe similarly compare the one-point probability density functions (PDFs) of each posterior sample $\\kappa^{(i)}$ to those of the matched simulation at $\\theta^{(i)}$, finding excellent agreement across all five tomographic redshift bins (\\autoref{fig:posterior-pdf}). As for the power spectrum, we also compute an aggregate PDF comparison by averaging the one-point distributions over many ground-truth fields and over posterior samples, obtaining a relative error $(\\overline{p(\\kappa)}_\\text{posterior}-\\overline{p(\\kappa)}_\\text{simulations})/\\overline{p(\\kappa)}_\\text{simulations}$ of $5.2\\%$ averaged across all redshift bins. Because each posterior sample is tested against a simulation at its own sampled cosmology, rather than against a fixed fiducial reference, these checks directly probe the consistency of the joint posterior, not just the marginal field statistics. The recovered PDFs additionally exhibit the expected log-normal shape, confirming that the model has learned the non-Gaussian structure imposed by the log-normal forward model. Further statistical comparisons are presented in Appendix~\\ref{sec:statistics-comparison}.\n\n\\subsection{Posterior coverage validation}\n\n\\autoref{fig:marginal-posterior} shows the 1D and 2D marginal posterior $p(\\theta\\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$, obtained by marginalizing the field from our joint posterior samples. For comparison, we run MCMC using NUTS, which requires gradients of the log-normal forward model provided by the differentiability of the \\texttt{sbi\\_lens} library. The diffusion-based contours are in excellent agreement with the MCMC result, recovering consistent credible regions and degeneracy directions across all parameter pairs. We note that while NUTS requires a differentiable forward model and must be run independently for each observation, our diffusion model is trained only from forward simulations and is amortized over observations. We further discuss the practical implications of these differences in Section \\ref{sec:discussion}. \n\nWe assess the calibration of the estimated posteriors using MIRA (Mass In Random Areas), a score for evaluating the accuracy of conditional distributions \\citep{sharief2026mirascoreconditionaldistribution}, together with the Tests of Accuracy with Random Points \\citep[TARP;][]{lemos2023sampling} diagnostic. Both the MIRA and TARP diagnostics are computed using $500$ observations with $500$ posterior samples drawn per observation. MIRA is a sample-based statistical test that verifies whether a conditional distribution assigns the correct density to any region of parameter space, by comparison with simulated parameters $\\theta, \\kappa, \\gamma_\\text{obs} \\sim p(\\theta, \\kappa, \\gamma_\\text{obs})$. A perfectly calibrated posterior yields a MIRA score of $2/3$, while the worst-case score is $1/2$. Applying MIRA to our learned joint posterior $p(\\theta, \\kappa \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$, we obtain a score of $0.635 \\pm 0.017$, indicating good calibration. This value suggests that the posterior is mildly overconfident, but it represents a strong result for a high-dimensional distribution. We further compute the MIRA score on the marginal cosmological posterior $p(\\theta \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$ and obtain $0.659 \\pm 0.0139$, which lies within MIRA's theoretical error bars of $1/\\sqrt{18L}$, where $L$ is the number of conditioning observations $\\gamma_\\text{obs}$ used to estimate the score, and reflects even better calibration. TARP complements this analysis by evaluating whether the credible regions of the inferred posterior achieve the correct frequentist coverage across many test observations. \\autoref{fig:tarp-theta-amortized} shows the resulting coverage plot, with the mean and $1\\sigma$, $2\\sigma$, and $3\\sigma$ error bars computed via bootstrap resampling. The coverage curves are consistent with the diagonal, indicating that the marginal cosmological posterior is well calibrated across the parameter space.\n\n\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{assets/power-spectra-posterior.pdf}\n \\caption{Auto- and cross-power spectra $\\mathcal{C}_\\ell$ of the convergence field for all tomographic bin combinations. For each posterior draw ($\\theta^{(i)}$, $\\kappa^{(i)}$), the black curves show the spectra of an independent simulation drawn at the sampled cosmology $\\theta^{(i)}$, while the corresponding posterior samples $\\kappa^{(i)}$ are shown in blue. The solid blue line indicates the mean over posterior samples, and the shaded region denotes the sample spread at $1\\sigma$.}\n \\label{fig:posterior-power-spectra}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=.9\\linewidth]{assets/tarp_conditional.pdf}\n \\caption{TARP coverage test of the marginal posterior $p(\\theta \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$ inferred with the amortized model, showing mean and error bars with $\\sigma \\in [1,2,3]$ computed with bootstrap.}\n \\label{fig:tarp-theta-amortized}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1.\\linewidth]{assets/contour_plot.pdf} \\\\\n \\caption{1D and 2D marginal posterior $p(\\theta \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$ contour plot, comparing our amortized diffusion sampling and classical MCMC contours for a single observation generated at fiducial Planck cosmology.\n }\n \\label{fig:marginal-posterior}\n\\end{figure}\n\\section{Discussion and conclusion} \\label{sec:discussion}\n\nIn this work, we introduced \\jade, a joint architecture for the simultaneous inference of convergence fields and cosmological parameters from weak lensing observations. By learning the joint posterior $p(\\theta, \\kappa \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$ with a single conditional diffusion model, our method unifies mass map reconstruction and cosmological parameter estimation within a coherent Bayesian framework, without requiring a differentiable forward model or MCMC sampling at inference time.\n\nWe validated our approach on a simulated LSST Y10-like weak lensing setting using log-normal convergence fields in a \\wcdm\\, model. The reconstructed convergence maps are statistically consistent with the jointly inferred cosmology, as verified through power spectra and one-point PDF comparisons. The marginal cosmological posterior is in excellent agreement with NUTS-based MCMC chains and is well calibrated as assessed by the TARP and MIRA diagnostics. These results demonstrate that a single diffusion model can jointly recover both the field and the cosmology at a quality comparable to dedicated methods for each task individually.\n\nOur method offers several practical advantages over explicit inference approaches, which as discussed in Section~\\ref{sec:field-level}, require a differentiable forward model and MCMC sampling.\nTraining requires only forward simulations, not a differentiable simulator, making it in principle applicable to arbitrarily complex forward models including full N-body and hydrodynamical codes for which analytical gradients are unavailable. \nThe model is amortized: once trained, posterior samples for any new observation are obtained by integrating the learned ODE at a cost of approximately 0.2 seconds per sample, and training needs one order of magnitude fewer simulations than required for sampling.\n\nSeveral directions remain for future improvement. Operating the diffusion model directly in pixel space, as we do here, becomes computationally challenging as the field resolution increases, since the transformer sequence length grows with the number of patches. This can be mitigated by adopting a latent diffusion approach \\citep{rombach2022high}, in which an autoencoder first compresses the field into a lower-dimensional representation on which the diffusion model operates. Such a strategy would significantly reduce the cost of both training and sampling, enabling application to higher-resolution fields at the expense of an additional autoencoder training stage.\n\nOur current demonstration relies on log-normal simulations, which are fast enough to generate the large training datasets required by the diffusion model. Scaling to more realistic but computationally expensive simulators, such as full N-body codes, introduces additional challenges. The training set must densely cover the cosmological parameter space to ensure the learned posterior generalizes across cosmologies, and the cost of generating sufficient simulations may become prohibitive. Furthermore, as an amortized method, \\jade, must be retrained whenever the data model changes, for instance when updating the survey mask, noise model, or systematic effects, unlike explicit inference methods which can adapt at inference time. Our setting also assumes a flat-sky approximation on a small patch; extending to curved-sky geometries and larger survey footprints will require architectural adaptations. More broadly, implicit inference methods rely on the fidelity of the training simulations: any mismatch between the simulated and real data distributions will propagate directly into the inferred posterior, making careful validation of the forward model essential before application to observational data.\n\nAlthough our method does not require a differentiable simulator, it can benefit from one when available. As proposed by \\cite{zeghal2022neural, Zeghal_2025}, gradient information from a differentiable forward model can be incorporated during training to improve sample efficiency, reducing the number of simulations needed to train the diffusion model. This is particularly relevant when training on expensive N-body simulations, where each sample carries a significant computational cost. Notably, this gradient-informed training strategy is not straightforward to apply to standard simulation-based inference methods for cosmology, which typically learn an amortized marginal posterior $p(\\theta \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$: the simulator gradients are defined on the joint space of fields and parameters, and there is no direct way to compare them against the output of a model that has marginalized over the fields. Because \\jade\\, models the full joint posterior $p(\\theta, \\kappa \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$, the learned denoiser operates in the same space as the simulator gradients, making it possible to incorporate this information directly into the training objective. We leave the exploration of this direction to future work.\n\nFinally, we note that the framework presented here is not specific to convergence field reconstruction. The same architecture and training procedure can be applied to any field-level inference problem where both a physical field and global parameters must be jointly recovered from observations. A natural extension is the reconstruction of initial conditions of the Universe jointly with cosmological parameters, which we will explore in future work. More broadly, \\jade\\, can be applied to other cosmological probes and combined with multi-probe analyses, where the joint inference of shared fields and parameters across different observables could further tighten cosmological constraints. \n\n\\section*{Acknowledgements}\n\\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Acknowledgements}\n\nAll authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the NSF-Simons AI-Institute for the Sky (SkAI) via grants NSF AST-2421845 and Simons Foundation MPS-AI-00010513. This research used the DeltaAI advanced computing and data resource, which is supported by the National Science Foundation (award OAC 2320345) and the State of Illinois. DeltaAI is a joint effort of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and its National Center for Supercomputing Applications.\n\n\\medskip\n\nThe code written to produce the results presented in this paper uses the following software: JAX \\citep{jax2018github}, Flax \\citep{flax2020github}, Numpy \\citep{harris2020array}, Matplotlib \\citep{Hunter:2007}, Lenstools \\citep{Petri_2016}, \\sbilens\\ \\citep{Lanzieri_2025}.\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% REFERENCES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\bibliographystyle{mnras}\n\\bibliography{references} % if your bibtex file is called example.bib\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% APPENDICES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\appendix\n\n\n\\section{Architecture details}\\label{sec:architecture}\n\nWe describe here the details of the \\jade\\, architecture, its training recipe, and the sampling procedure. The full set of hyper-parameters is reported in \\autoref{tab:placeholder}. Our design closely follows the Just image Transformer \\citep[JiT;][]{li2026basicsletdenoisinggenerative}, extended to operate jointly on a convergence field and on cosmological parameters, and optionally on an observed shear field used as conditioning.\n\n\n\n\\begin{table}\n \\centering\n \\begin{tabular}{lc}\n \\hline\n \\hline\n \\textbf{Architecture} & \\\\\n image size & $128\\times 128$ \\\\\n channels (tomographic bins) & 5 \\\\\n patch size $p$ & 8 \\\\\n conditioning patch size $p_\\text{cond}$ & 8 \\\\\n \\# cosmology tokens $N_\\theta$ & 16 \\\\\n depth $L$ & 12 \\\\\n hidden dim $d$ & 768 \\\\\n attention heads $h$ & 12 \\\\\n bottleneck dim $b$ & 128 \\\\\n normalization & RMSNorm \\\\\n feed-forward & SwiGLU \\\\\n positional embedding (field/cond) & RoPE \\\\\n attention stabilization & qk-norm \\\\\n time conditioning & adaLN-Zero \\\\\n \\hline\n \\textbf{Training} & \\\\\n loss type & $v$-loss ($x$-pred.) \\\\\n time distribution & logit-normal \\\\\n $(\\mu, \\sigma)$ & $(-0.8,\\, 0.8)$ \\\\\n $(1-t)$ clipping $t_\\text{eps}$ & 0.05 \\\\\n optimizer & AdamW \\\\\n $(\\beta_1, \\beta_2)$ & $(0.9,\\, 0.95)$ \\\\\n weight decay & 0 \\\\\n schedule & warmup + cosine decay \\\\\n initial learning rate & $5\\times 10^{-3}$ \\\\\n final learning rate & $1\\times 10^{-4}$ \\\\\n data augmentation & flips + $90^{\\circ}$ rotations \\\\\n noise resampling & on the fly \\\\\n gradient norm clipping & 1.0 \\\\\n EMA decay & 0.999 \\\\\n batch size & 128 \\\\\n epochs & 750 \\\\\n precision & bfloat16 \\\\\n \\hline\n \\textbf{Sampling} & \\\\\n solver & Heun \\\\\n steps & 256 \\\\\n time grid & linear in $[0, 1]$ \\\\\n \\hline\n \\end{tabular}\n \\caption{Hyper-parameters used to set up the architecture, train, and sample from the conditional \\jade\\ model.}\n \\label{tab:placeholder}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\subsection{Patch embeddings and token sequence}\n\nThe target convergence field $\\kappa \\in \\mathbb{R}^{H\\times W\\times C}$, with $H=W=128$ and $C=5$ tomographic bins, is divided into non-overlapping patches of size $p\\times p$ with $p=8$, yielding a sequence of $(H/p)\\times(W/p) = 16\\times 16 = 256$ field tokens. Each patch is a $p\\times p\\times C = 320$-dimensional vector, which is projected into the $d=768$-dimensional hidden space of the transformer by a bottleneck linear embedding \\citep{li2026basicsletdenoisinggenerative}. Following their prescription, we replace the single linear embedding of the standard ViT \\citep{dosovitskiy2021imageworth16x16words} by two successive linear layers with an intermediate bottleneck dimension $b=128$, acting as a low-rank reparameterization of the patch embedding. The symmetric predictor that projects output tokens back to $p\\times p\\times C$ patches also uses a bottleneck pair of linear layers. Fixed sinusoidal 2D positional embeddings are added to the field patch embeddings.\n\nThe six cosmological parameters $\\theta\\in\\mathbb{R}^{6}$ are projected to a sequence of $N_\\theta = 16$ tokens in the same hidden space by a dedicated linear projector, to which we add learnable positional embeddings. Using multiple cosmology tokens rather than a single one follows the in-context class conditioning strategy of \\cite{li2026basicsletdenoisinggenerative} (repeated from MAR, \\citealt{li2024autoregressive}), and gives the transformer a larger capacity to propagate cosmological information through the sequence. At the output, the corresponding $N_\\theta$ tokens are averaged and passed through a separate linear head to predict the denoised cosmology $\\theta$.\n\nWhen a noisy shear observation $\\gamma_\\text{obs}\\in\\mathbb{R}^{H\\times W\\times C}$ is provided as conditioning, it is tokenized with an independent bottleneck patch embedding and its own learnable 2D positional embedding. This produces an additional $16\\times 16 = 256$ conditioning tokens. The full input sequence to the transformer is therefore\n\\begin{equation}\n [\\underbrace{e^\\theta_1, \\dots, e^\\theta_{16}}_{\\text{cosmology}}, \\; \\underbrace{e^{\\gamma}_{1}, \\dots, e^{\\gamma}_{64}}_{\\text{conditioning}}, \\; \\underbrace{e^{\\kappa}_{1}, \\dots, e^{\\kappa}_{256}}_{\\text{field}}],\n\\end{equation}\nfor a total length of $528$ tokens. The output tokens associated with the conditioning are discarded, as they are not constrained by the loss.\n\n\\subsection{Transformer blocks}\n\nThe token sequence is processed by $L=12$ transformer blocks with hidden dimension $d=768$ and $h=12$ attention heads, following the recipe of \\cite{li2026basicsletdenoisinggenerative}. Each block consists of multi-head self-attention followed by a feed-forward network, with pre-normalization. We adopt the following modern components: RMSNorm \\citep{zhang2019root} in place of LayerNorm, SwiGLU \\citep{shazeer2020glu} as the feed-forward non-linearity, rotary positional embeddings \\citep[RoPE;][]{su2024roformer} applied to the field and conditioning tokens (the cosmology tokens are excluded from RoPE and act as a register-like prefix), and query-key normalization \\citep{henry2020query} for attention stability. Formally, a single attention head computes\n\\begin{equation}\n \\text{Attn}(Q, K, V) = \\text{softmax}\\!\\left(\\frac{\\mathcal{R}(Q)\\,\\mathcal{R}(K)^\\top}{\\sqrt{d_h}}\\right) V,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $Q, K, V$ are the query, key, and value projections of the normalized input, $d_h = d/h = 64$ is the per-head dimension, and $\\mathcal{R}$ denotes the RoPE rotation applied to field and conditioning tokens. Queries and keys are additionally RMSNorm-normalized before the attention product.\n\n\\subsection{Time conditioning}\n\nThe diffusion time $t\\in[0,1]$ is encoded with a sinusoidal frequency embedding followed by a two-layer MLP, producing a conditioning vector $c(t)\\in\\mathbb{R}^{d}$. This vector modulates every transformer block and the field predictor head via adaLN-Zero \\citep{peebles2023scalable}. Inside each block, the scale, shift, and residual gate parameters of the attention and MLP sublayers are predicted as affine functions of $c(t)$. The adaLN projections are initialized to zero so that each block starts as an identity mapping at the beginning of training, which has been shown to stabilize the optimization of diffusion transformers \\citep{peebles2023scalable}.\n\n\n\\begin{figure*}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{assets/one-point-function.pdf}\n \\caption{One-point probability density functions of the convergence field for each of the five tomographic bins. For each posterior draw $(\\theta^{(i)}, \\kappa^{(i)})$, the posterior sample PDF (blue) is compared to the PDF of an independent simulation generated at the sampled cosmology $\\theta^{(i)}$ (black). The posterior samples closely reproduce the expected log-normal shape across all bins, confirming that the model captures the non-Gaussian pixel statistics of the convergence field beyond the two-point information validated by the power spectrum.}\n \\label{fig:posterior-pdf}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\n\\subsection{Initialization}\n\nLinear layers are initialized with Xavier uniform initialization \\citep{glorot2010understanding}. Following \\cite{peebles2023scalable} and \\cite{li2026basicsletdenoisinggenerative}, the adaLN modulation layers and the final predictor layers are zero-initialized, so that the network initially predicts the clean sample equal to the noisy input (and the corresponding velocity is the identity interpolation), providing a stable starting point for flow matching training.\n\n\\subsection{Time distribution and loss}\n\nFollowing \\cite{esser2024scaling} and \\cite{li2026basicsletdenoisinggenerative}, during training we sample the diffusion time $t$ from a logit-normal distribution: $s\\sim\\mathcal{N}(\\mu,\\sigma^2)$ and $t = \\text{sigmoid}(s)$, with $\\mu=-0.8$ and $\\sigma=0.8$. This biases training towards mid-to-high noise levels, which we empirically found beneficial in our setting.\n\nFollowing the trick advocated by \\cite{li2026basicsletdenoisinggenerative}, we optimize the flow matching $v$-loss of \\autoref{eq:loss-velocity}, but parameterize the neural network so that it predicts the clean sample $x_1 = [\\theta_1, \\kappa_1]$ rather than the velocity. The velocity $v_\\varphi$ entering the loss is reconstructed from the denoiser output $d_\\varphi$ through \\autoref{eq:velocity-denoiser}, so that the training objective reads\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:jade-loss}\n \\mathcal{L}(\\varphi) = \\mathbb{E} \\left[ \\left\\| \\frac{d_\\varphi(x_t, t, \\gamma_\\text{obs}) - x_t}{\\max(1-t,\\, t_\\text{eps})} - (x_1 - x_0) \\right\\|^2 \\right],\n\\end{equation}\nwhere the expectation is taken over $p(t)\\,p(x_1)\\,p(x_0)$ with $x_t = t x_1 + (1-t) x_0$, and $t_\\text{eps}=0.05$ clips the $(1-t)$ denominator as $t\\to 1$ \\citep{li2026basicsletdenoisinggenerative}. We emphasize that the field and cosmology components of the denoiser enter this single, unweighted mean-squared-error objective on the same footing. Introducing a relative weight between the field and cosmology components of the velocity residual in \\autoref{eq:jade-loss} would no longer target the true joint velocity field, and would therefore bias the recovered joint posterior $p(\\kappa,\\theta\\mid\\gamma_\\text{obs})$.\n\n\\subsection{Data augmentation and on-the-fly noise}\n\nBecause the convergence field is statistically isotropic on the small patches considered here, we apply random flips and $90^{\\circ}$ rotations to each clean convergence map at every training step. This cheap augmentation effectively multiplies the number of distinct fields seen by the network, reducing the risk of the transformer memorizing individual training simulations.\n\nThe conditioning shear $\\gamma_\\text{obs}$ is not stored alongside the dataset but is re-generated at every training iteration by applying the Kaiser-Squires operator to the convergence and adding a fresh realization of LSST-Y10 shape noise (see Section~\\ref{sec:log-normal}). As a result, the network sees a different noise realization of the same underlying field at each epoch, which acts as an additional regularizer and forces the learned posterior to marginalize explicitly over the noise distribution rather than over a fixed empirical sample.\n\n\\subsection{Optimization}\n\n\\jade\\, is trained with Adam \\citep{kingma2014adam} using $(\\beta_1, \\beta_2) = (0.9, 0.95)$, no weight decay, and gradient norm clipping at $1.0$. The learning rate follows a warmup-then-cosine-decay schedule. It is linearly warmed up from $5\\times 10^{-3}$ to a peak value and then decayed with a cosine profile down to $1\\times 10^{-4}$ by the end of training. We use bfloat16 mixed precision on a single NVIDIA GH200 96\\,GB GPU with a batch size of 128, training for 750 epochs on 100,000 simulated pairs $(\\theta, \\kappa)$, with $\\gamma_\\text{obs}$ resampled on the fly as described above. We maintain an exponential moving average of the weights with decay $0.999$, which is used for all reported results.\n\n\\subsection{Sampling}\n\nPosterior samples are obtained by integrating the ODE in \\autoref{eq:ode} with the velocity field reconstructed from the denoiser through \\autoref{eq:velocity-denoiser}. We use Heun's second-order solver \\citep{karras2022elucidating} with $256$ steps on a linear time grid in $[0, 1]$, starting from $\\kappa_0\\sim\\mathcal{N}(0, I)$ and $\\theta_0\\sim\\mathcal{N}(0, I_6)$, and with $\\gamma_\\text{obs}$ provided as a fixed conditioning input at every step.\n\n\\section{Posterior samples statistics check}\\label{sec:statistics-comparison}\n\nTo verify that the convergence fields produced by our conditional diffusion model are statistically consistent with the jointly sampled cosmology, we perform checks of summary statistics checks. For each posterior draw $(\\theta^{(i)}, \\kappa^{(i)}) \\sim p_\\varphi(\\theta, \\kappa \\mid \\gamma_\\text{obs})$, we draw an independent simulation $\\kappa^{(i)}_\\text{sim}$ from the forward model at the sampled cosmology $\\theta^{(i)}$ and compare summary statistics between $\\kappa^{(i)}$ and $\\kappa^{(i)}_\\text{sim}$. Because the reference simulation is drawn at $\\theta^{(i)}$ rather than at a fixed fiducial cosmology, this test directly probes the consistency of the joint posterior. For the log-normal forward model considered here, the field statistics are fully specified by the power spectrum and the shift parameter $\\lambda(z,\\theta)$, so the auto- and cross-power spectra (\\autoref{fig:posterior-power-spectra}) together with the one-point PDFs (\\autoref{fig:posterior-pdf}) are statistically sufficient to validate our field-level posterior samples. Extending these checks with summaries more sensitive to scale-coupled non-Gaussianity, such as the scattering transform, will become informative when moving to N-body simulators.\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\n% Don't change these lines\n\\bsp\t% typesetting comment\n\\label{lastpage}\n\\end{document}\n\n% End of mnras_template.tex\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: mnras.cls\n================================================\n% mnras.cls\n%\n% MNRAS journal document class file\n% v3.2 for LaTeX 2e\n%\n% Copyright (C) Royal Astronomical Society 2015, Blackwell Science 2001,\n% Cambridge University Press 1994\n%\n% Authors:\n% David Rhead, Springer Verlag, M. Reed, Sue Brooks, Alison Woollatt,\n% Mark Reed, Nadine Thompson, John Thompson, David Evans, Keith T. Smith,\n% Norman Gray\n%\n% For a full change log see the end of this file.\n% See mnras_guide for a user guide\n%\n% This work may be distributed and/or modified under the\n% conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3\n% of this license or (at your option) any later version.\n% The latest version of this license is in\n% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt\n% and version 1.3 or later is part of all distributions of LaTeX\n% version 2005/12/01 or later.\n%\n% This work has the LPPL maintenance status `author-maintained'.\n% \n% The Current Maintainer of this work is: Royal Astronomical Society,\n% MNRAS Editorial Office, who can be contacted on mn@ras.org.uk\n%\n% This work consists of all the files listed in readme.txt\n\n\n% Preamble to this style file\n\n\\def\\@version{3.2}\n\\def\\@releasedate{2023/07/20}\n\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesClass{mnras}[\\@releasedate\\ v\\@version\\ LaTeX2e MNRAS document class]\n\n\\typeout{MNRAS document style v\\@version, released \\@releasedate}\n\n% Journals use two-sided printing.\n%\n\\@twosidetrue\n\\@twocolumntrue\n\\@mparswitchtrue\n\\def\\ds@draft{\\overfullrule 5pt}\n\\def\\ds@twocolumn{\\@twocolumntrue}\n\\def\\ds@onecolumn{\\@twocolumnfalse}\n\n% letters option\n%\n\\newif\\if@letters\n\\def\\ds@letters{\\@letterstrue}\n\n% landscape option\n%\n\\newif\\ifSFB@landscape\n\\def\\ds@landscape{\\SFB@landscapetrue}\n\n% galley option\n%\n\\newif\\ifSFB@galley\n\\def\\ds@galley{\\SFB@galleytrue}\n\n% usenatbib option\n%\n\\newif\\if@usenatbib\n\\def\\ds@usenatbib{\\@usenatbibtrue}\n\n% usedcolumn option\n%\n\\newif\\if@usedcolumn\n\\def\\ds@usedcolumn{\\@usedcolumntrue}\n\n% usegraphicx option\n\\newif\\if@usegraphicx\n\\def\\ds@usegraphicx{\\@usegraphicxtrue\\usepackage{graphicx}}\n\n% referee option\n%\n\\newif\\ifSFB@referee\n\\def\\ds@referee{%\n \\SFB@refereetrue\n \\@twocolumnfalse\n}\n\\newif\\ifdoublesp@cing\n\\def\\ds@doublespacing{%\n \\doublesp@cingtrue\n}%\n%%%\n%%% NHT: New AMS fonts option\n%%%\n\\newif\\ifNHT@useAMS\n\\def\\ds@useAMS{\\NHT@useAMStrue}\n%\n\n% Prevent fleqn throwing an 'unknown option' warning\n\\newif\\if@fleqn\n\\def\\ds@fleqn{\\@fleqntrue}\n\n% Silently execute these options. I'm not convinced this actually does anything.\n\\ExecuteOptions{a4paper,twoside,final,fleqn}\n% \\ExecuteOptions{twoside,final,fleqn}\n\n% Throw warning if the user tries to use US Letter paper\n\\newif\\if@letterpaper\n\\def\\ds@letterpaper{\\PackageWarning{mnras}{MNRAS uses A4 paper, option 'letterpaper' is ignored}}\n\n% Error message for unknown options\n\\DeclareOption*{\\PackageWarning{mnras}{Unknown option `\\CurrentOption'}}\n\n\\ProcessOptions\\relax\n\n% Before we do anything else with layout, ensure that the paper is A4\n\\usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}\n%%\n\\setlength\\paperwidth{210mm}%\n\\setlength\\paperheight{276mm}%\n%%\n\n% Fix several errors with LaTeX2e, including 2-column floats out of order\n% \\usepackage{fixltx2e} %% Unnecessary since TL2015\n\n% Include hyperref, so we can have clickable links\n\\usepackage[pdfpagelabels=false]{hyperref}\t% Hyperlinks\n\\hypersetup{colorlinks=true,linkcolor=blue,citecolor=blue,filecolor=blue,urlcolor=blue,}\n%\n% ****************************************\n% * Font sizes *\n% ****************************************\n% Note these are misleadingly named - most text is not in \\normalsize etc.\n\n\\lineskip 1pt\n\\normallineskip 1pt\n\\ifSFB@referee\n \\def\\baselinestretch{1.5}\n\\else\n \\ifdoublesp@cing\n \\def\\baselinestretch{2}\n\\else\n \\def\\baselinestretch{1}\n\\fi\\fi\n\\if@twocolumn\n \\renewcommand\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize\\normalsize\\@ixpt{11}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 6pt plus 2pt minus 2pt\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\abovedisplayshortskip 6pt plus 2pt\n \\belowdisplayshortskip \\abovedisplayshortskip\n \\let\\@listi\\@listI}\n \\else\n \\ifSFB@referee\n \\renewcommand\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize\\normalsize\\@xiipt{14}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 4pt plus 1pt minus 1pt\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\abovedisplayshortskip 4pt plus 1pt\n \\belowdisplayshortskip \\abovedisplayshortskip\n \\let\\@listi\\@listI}\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\normalsize{\\@setfontsize\\normalsize\\@ixpt{12}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 4pt plus 1pt minus 1pt\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\abovedisplayshortskip 4pt plus 1pt\n \\belowdisplayshortskip \\abovedisplayshortskip\n \\let\\@listi\\@listI}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\\newcommand\\small{\\@setfontsize\\small\\@viiipt{10}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 4pt plus 1pt minus 1pt\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\abovedisplayshortskip 4pt plus 1pt\n \\belowdisplayshortskip \\abovedisplayshortskip\n \\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\topsep 2pt plus 1pt minus 1pt\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\itemsep 2pt}}\n\\newcommand\\footnotesize{\\@setfontsize\\footnotesize\\@viiipt{10}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 4pt plus 1pt minus 1pt\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\abovedisplayshortskip 4pt plus 1pt\n \\belowdisplayshortskip \\abovedisplayshortskip\n \\renewcommand\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\topsep 2pt plus 1pt minus 1pt\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\itemsep 2pt}}\n\\newcommand\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize\\scriptsize\\@vipt{8}}\n\\newcommand\\tiny{\\@setfontsize\\tiny\\@vpt{6}}\n%\n%%new font for abstract/keywords\n\\def\\@xivpt{14}\n\\def\\@xiipt{12}\n\\def\\@xvipt{16}\n\\newcommand\\abslarge{\\@setfontsize\\abslarge\\@xpt{12.5}}\n%%\n\\if@twocolumn\n \\newcommand\\large{\\@setfontsize\\large\\@xpt{11}}\n \\else\n \\newcommand\\large{\\@setfontsize\\large\\@xpt{12}}\n \\fi\n\\newcommand\\Large{\\@setfontsize\\Large\\@xiipt{14}}\n%%\\newcommand\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize\\LARGE\\@xivpt{17}}\n\\newcommand\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize\\LARGE\\@xiipt{15}}\n%%\\newcommand\\huge{\\@setfontsize\\huge\\@xviipt{20}}\n\\newcommand\\huge{\\@setfontsize\\huge\\@xvipt{18}}\n\\newcommand\\Huge{\\@setfontsize\\Huge\\@xxpt{25}}\n%\n\\newcommand\\sevensize{\\@setfontsize\\sevensize\\@viipt{8}}\n%\n\\normalsize\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Extra Math / Symbol code %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n \\newcommand{\\rmn}[1]{{\\mathrm{#1}}}\n \\newcommand{\\itl}[1]{{\\mathit{#1}}}\n \\newcommand{\\bld}[1]{{\\mathbf{#1}}}\n\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\rm}{\\normalfont\\rmfamily}{\\mathrm}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\sf}{\\normalfont\\sffamily}{\\mathsf}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\tt}{\\normalfont\\ttfamily}{\\mathtt}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\bf}{\\normalfont\\bfseries}{\\mathbf}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\it}{\\normalfont\\itshape}{\\mathit}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\sl}{\\normalfont\\slshape}{\\@nomath\\sl}\n\\DeclareOldFontCommand{\\sc}{\\normalfont\\scshape}{\\@nomath\\sc}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand\\cal{\\@fontswitch{\\relax}{\\mathcal}}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand\\mit{\\@fontswitch{\\relax}{\\mathchoice}}\n%\n\n\\def\\hexnumber#1{\\ifcase#1 0\\or1\\or2\\or3\\or4\\or5\\or6\\or7%\n \\or8\\or9\\or A\\or B\\or C\\or D\\or E\\or F\\fi}\n\n\\def\\setboxz@h{\\setbox\\z@\\hbox}\n\\def\\wdz@{\\wd\\z@}\n\\def\\boxz@{\\box\\z@}\n\\def\\setbox@ne{\\setbox\\@ne}\n\\def\\wd@ne{\\wd\\@ne}\n\n\\def\\math@atom#1#2{%\n \\binrel@{#1}\\binrel@@{#2}}\n\\def\\binrel@#1{\\setboxz@h{\\thinmuskip0mu\n \\medmuskip\\m@ne mu\\thickmuskip\\@ne mu$#1\\m@th$}%\n \\setbox@ne\\hbox{\\thinmuskip0mu\\medmuskip\\m@ne mu\\thickmuskip\n \\@ne mu${}#1{}\\m@th$}%\n \\setbox\\tw@\\hbox{\\hskip\\wd@ne\\hskip-\\wdz@}}\n\\def\\binrel@@#1{\\ifdim\\wd2<\\z@\\mathbin{#1}\\else\\ifdim\\wd\\tw@>\\z@\n \\mathrel{#1}\\else{#1}\\fi\\fi}\n\n% These must be here because \\newif and \\newtoks are defined \\outer.\n\\newif\\iffirstta\n\\newtoks\\math@groups\n\\newif\\ifd@f\n\n\n% Make these do nothing (for backwards compatibility}\n\\let\\loadboldmathitalic=\\relax\n\\let\\loadboldgreek=\\relax\n\n% font definitions for NFSS release 2\n\n\\newcommand{\\textbfit}[1]{\\textbf{\\textit{#1}}}\n\\newcommand{\\mathbfit}[1]{\\textbf{\\textit{#1}}}\n\\newcommand{\\textbfss}[1]{\\textbf{\\textsf{#1}}}\n\\newcommand{\\mathbfss}[1]{\\textbf{\\textsf{#1}}}\n\n %\n \\def\\mathch{\\protect\\p@mathch}\n \\def\\p@mathch#1#2{%\n \\begingroup\n \\let\\@nomath\\@gobble \\mathversion{#1}%\n \\math@atom{#2}{%\n \\mathchoice%\n {\\hbox{$\\m@th\\displaystyle#2$}}%\n {\\hbox{$\\m@th\\textstyle#2$}}%\n {\\hbox{$\\m@th\\scriptstyle#2$}}%\n {\\hbox{$\\m@th\\scriptscriptstyle#2$}}}%\n \\endgroup}\n %\n \\def\\bmath{\\protect\\p@boldm}\n \\def\\p@boldm#1{\\mathch{bold}{#1}}\n%\n\n \\let\\mit=\\mathnormal\n %\n % The following is needed because NFSS release 2\n % does not define the bold\n % math symbol font to be available!\n %\n \\SetSymbolFont{symbols}{bold}{OMS}{cmsy}{b}{n}\n %\n \\DeclareSymbolFont{bmisymbols}{OML}{cmm}{b}{it}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\balpha}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"0B}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bbeta}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"0C}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bgamma}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"0D}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bdelta}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"0E}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bepsilon}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"0F}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bzeta}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"10}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\boldeta}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"11}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\btheta}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"12}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\biota}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"13}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bkappa}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"14}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\blambda}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"15}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bmu}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"16}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bnu}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"17}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bxi}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"18}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bpi}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"19}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\brho}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"1A}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bsigma}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"1B}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\btau}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"1C}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bupsilon}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"1D}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bphi}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"1E}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bchi}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"1F}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bpsi}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"20}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bomega}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"21}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bvarepsilon}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"22}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bvartheta}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"23}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bvarpi}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"24}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bvarrho}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"25}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bvarsigma}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"26}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\bvarphi}{0}{bmisymbols}{\"27}\n %\n\n%% Define font shapes for Euler upright Math\n\\ifNHT@useAMS\n \\DeclareSymbolFont{UPM}{U}{eur}{m}{n}\n \\SetSymbolFont{UPM}{bold}{U}{eur}{b}{n}\n \\DeclareSymbolFont{AMSa}{U}{msa}{m}{n}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\upi}{0}{UPM}{\"19}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\umu}{0}{UPM}{\"16}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\upartial}{0}{UPM}{\"40}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\leqslant}{3}{AMSa}{\"36}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\geqslant}{3}{AMSa}{\"3E}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\la}{3}{AMSa}{46}\n \\DeclareMathSymbol{\\ga}{3}{AMSa}{38}\n %\n \\let\\oldle=\\le \\let\\oldleq=\\leq\n \\let\\oldge=\\ge \\let\\oldgeq=\\geq\n \\let\\leq=\\leqslant \\let\\le=\\leqslant\n \\let\\geq=\\geqslant \\let\\ge=\\geqslant\n\n\\else\n \\newcommand{\\upi}{\\pi}\n \\newcommand{\\umu}{\\mu}\n \\newcommand{\\upartial}{\\partial}\n \\newcommand{\\la}{\\,\\rlap{\\raise 0.5ex\\hbox{$<$}}{\\lower 1.0ex\\hbox{$\\sim$}}\\,}\n \\newcommand{\\ga}{\\,\\rlap{\\raise 0.5ex\\hbox{$>$}}{\\lower 1.0ex\\hbox{$\\sim$}}\\,}\n\n\\fi\n\n% Astronomy and Astrophysics symbol macros\n\n\\newcommand\\getsto{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\n\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\reset@font\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\gets\\cr\\to\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\gets\n\\cr\\to\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\gets\n\\cr\\to\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n\\gets\\cr\\to\\cr}}}}}\n\n\\newcommand\\cor{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\hbox{$\\widehat=$}}{\\hbox{$\\widehat=$}}\n{\\hbox{$\\reset@font\\scriptstyle\\hat=$}}\n{\\hbox{$\\reset@font\\scriptscriptstyle\\hat=$}}}}\n\n\\newcommand\\lid{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\reset@font\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n<\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip0.9pt}=\\cr}}}}}\n\n\\newcommand\\gid{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\reset@font\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1.2pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip1pt}=\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\n\\noalign{\\vskip0.9pt}=\\cr}}}}}\n\n\\newcommand\\sol{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\reset@font\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\sim\\cr<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\sim\\cr\n<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\sim\\cr\n<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n\\sim\\cr<\\cr}}}}}\n\n\\newcommand\\sog{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\reset@font\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\sim\\cr>\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\\sim\\cr\n>\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n\\sim\\cr>\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n\\sim\\cr>\\cr}}}}}\n\n\\newcommand\\lse{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\reset@font\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\\simeq\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n<\\cr\\simeq\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n<\\cr\\simeq\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n<\\cr\\simeq\\cr}}}}}\n\n\\newcommand\\gse{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\reset@font\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\\simeq\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\simeq\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\simeq\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\simeq\\cr}}}}}\n\n\\newcommand\\grole{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\reset@font\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-1.5pt}<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-1.5pt}<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-1pt}<\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-0.5pt}<\\cr}}}}}\n\n\\newcommand\\leogr{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\reset@font\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-1.5pt}>\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n<\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-1.5pt}>\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n<\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-1pt}>\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n<\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip-0.5pt}>\\cr}}}}}\n\n\\newcommand\\loa{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\reset@font\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr<\\cr\\approx\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n<\\cr\\approx\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n<\\cr\\approx\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n<\\cr\\approx\\cr}}}}}\n\n\\newcommand\\goa{\\mathrel{\\mathchoice {\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil\n$\\reset@font\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr>\\cr\\approx\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\approx\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\approx\\cr}}}\n{\\vcenter{\\offinterlineskip\\halign{\\hfil$\\reset@font\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n>\\cr\\approx\\cr}}}}}\n\n\\newcommand\\sun{\\hbox{$\\odot$}}\n\\newcommand\\earth{\\hbox{$\\oplus$}}\n\\newcommand\\degr{\\hbox{$^\\circ$}}\n\\newcommand\\diameter{{\\ifmmode\\mathchoice\n{\\ooalign{\\hfil\\hbox{$\\reset@font\\displaystyle/$}\\hfil\\crcr\n{\\hbox{$\\reset@font\\displaystyle\\mathchar\"20D$}}}}\n{\\ooalign{\\hfil\\hbox{$\\reset@font\\textstyle/$}\\hfil\\crcr\n{\\hbox{$\\reset@font\\textstyle\\mathchar\"20D$}}}}\n{\\ooalign{\\hfil\\hbox{$\\reset@font\\scriptstyle/$}\\hfil\\crcr\n{\\hbox{$\\reset@font\\scriptstyle\\mathchar\"20D$}}}}\n{\\ooalign{\\hfil\\hbox{$\\reset@font\\scriptscriptstyle/$}\\hfil\\crcr\n{\\hbox{$\\reset@font\\scriptscriptstyle\\mathchar\"20D$}}}}\n\\else{\\ooalign{\\hfil/\\hfil\\crcr\\mathhexbox20D}}%\n\\fi}}\n\n\\newcommand\\sq{\\hbox{\\rlap{$\\sqcap$}$\\sqcup$}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\romn}[1] {{\\mathrm #1}}\n\n\\newcommand\\fd{\\hbox{$.\\!\\!^{\\reset@font\\romn d}$}}\n\\newcommand\\fh{\\hbox{$.\\!\\!^{\\reset@font\\romn h}$}}\n\\newcommand\\fm{\\hbox{$.\\!\\!^{\\reset@font\\romn m}$}}\n\\newcommand\\fs{\\hbox{$.\\!\\!^{\\reset@font\\romn s}$}}\n\\newcommand\\fdg{\\hbox{$.\\!\\!^\\circ$}}\n\\newcommand\\farcm{\\hbox{$.\\mkern-4mu^\\prime$}}\n\\newcommand\\farcs{\\hbox{$.\\!\\!^{\\prime\\prime}$}}\n\\newcommand\\fp{\\hbox{$.\\!\\!^{\\reset@font\\reset@font\\scriptscriptstyle\\romn p}$}}\n\\newcommand\\arcmin{\\hbox{$^\\prime$}}\n\\newcommand\\arcsec{\\hbox{$^{\\prime\\prime}$}}\n\n\\newcommand\\micron{\\hbox{$\\umu$m}}\n\\newcommand\\ion[2]{\\text{#1\\,\\textsc{\\lowercase{#2}}}}\t% ionization states\n\n% Standard journal abbreviations\n% Mostly as used by ADS, with a few additions for journals where MNRAS does not\n% follow normal IAU style.\n\n\\newcommand\\aap{A\\&A} % Astronomy and Astrophysics\n\\let\\astap=\\aap % alternative shortcut\n\\newcommand\\aapr{A\\&ARv} % Astronomy and Astrophysics Review (the)\n\\newcommand\\aaps{A\\&AS} % Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series\n\\newcommand\\actaa{Acta Astron.} % Acta Astronomica\n\\newcommand\\afz{Afz} % Astrofizika\n\\newcommand\\aj{AJ} % Astronomical Journal (the)\n\\newcommand\\ao{Appl. Opt.} % Applied Optics\n\\let\\applopt=\\ao % alternative shortcut\n\\newcommand\\aplett{Astrophys.~Lett.} % Astrophysics Letters\n\\newcommand\\apj{ApJ} % Astrophysical Journal\n\\newcommand\\apjl{ApJ} % Astrophysical Journal, Letters\n\\let\\apjlett=\\apjl % alternative shortcut\n\\newcommand\\apjs{ApJS} % Astrophysical Journal, Supplement\n\\let\\apjsupp=\\apjs % alternative shortcut\n% The following journal does not appear to exist! Disabled.\n%\\newcommand\\apspr{Astrophys.~Space~Phys.~Res.} % Astrophysics Space Physics Research\n\\newcommand\\apss{Ap\\&SS} % Astrophysics and Space Science\n\\newcommand\\araa{ARA\\&A} % Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics\n\\newcommand\\arep{Astron. Rep.} % Astronomy Reports\n\\newcommand\\aspc{ASP Conf. Ser.} % ASP Conference Series\n\\newcommand\\azh{Azh} % Astronomicheskii Zhurnal\n\\newcommand\\baas{BAAS} % Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society\n\\newcommand\\bac{Bull. Astron. Inst. Czechoslovakia} % Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia \n\\newcommand\\bain{Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands} % Bulletin Astronomical Institute of the Netherlands\n\\newcommand\\caa{Chinese Astron. Astrophys.} % Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics\n\\newcommand\\cjaa{Chinese J.~Astron. Astrophys.} % Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics\n\\newcommand\\fcp{Fundamentals Cosmic Phys.} % Fundamentals of Cosmic Physics\n\\newcommand\\gca{Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta} % Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta\n\\newcommand\\grl{Geophys. Res. Lett.} % Geophysics Research Letters\n\\newcommand\\iaucirc{IAU~Circ.} % IAU Cirulars\n\\newcommand\\icarus{Icarus} % Icarus\n\\newcommand\\japa{J.~Astrophys. Astron.} % Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy\n\\newcommand\\jcap{J.~Cosmology Astropart. Phys.} % Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics\n\\newcommand\\jcp{J.~Chem.~Phys.} % Journal of Chemical Physics\n\\newcommand\\jgr{J.~Geophys.~Res.} % Journal of Geophysics Research\n\\newcommand\\jqsrt{J.~Quant. Spectrosc. Radiative Transfer} % Journal of Quantitiative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer\n\\newcommand\\jrasc{J.~R.~Astron. Soc. Canada} % Journal of the RAS of Canada\n\\newcommand\\memras{Mem.~RAS} % Memoirs of the RAS\n\\newcommand\\memsai{Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana} % Memoire della Societa Astronomica Italiana\n\\newcommand\\mnassa{MNASSA} % Monthly Notes of the Astronomical Society of Southern Africa\n\\newcommand\\mnras{MNRAS} % Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society\n\\newcommand\\na{New~Astron.} % New Astronomy\n\\newcommand\\nar{New~Astron.~Rev.} % New Astronomy Review\n\\newcommand\\nat{Nature} % Nature\n\\newcommand\\nphysa{Nuclear Phys.~A} % Nuclear Physics A\n\\newcommand\\pra{Phys. Rev.~A} % Physical Review A: General Physics\n\\newcommand\\prb{Phys. Rev.~B} % Physical Review B: Solid State\n\\newcommand\\prc{Phys. Rev.~C} % Physical Review C\n\\newcommand\\prd{Phys. Rev.~D} % Physical Review D\n\\newcommand\\pre{Phys. Rev.~E} % Physical Review E\n\\newcommand\\prl{Phys. Rev.~Lett.} % Physical Review Letters\n\\newcommand\\pasa{Publ. Astron. Soc. Australia} % Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia\n\\newcommand\\pasp{PASP} % Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific\n\\newcommand\\pasj{PASJ} % Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan\n\\newcommand\\physrep{Phys.~Rep.} % Physics Reports\n\\newcommand\\physscr{Phys.~Scr.} % Physica Scripta\n\\newcommand\\planss{Planet. Space~Sci.} % Planetary Space Science\n\\newcommand\\procspie{Proc.~SPIE} % Proceedings of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers\n\\newcommand\\rmxaa{Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofis.} % Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica\n\\newcommand\\qjras{QJRAS} % Quarterly Journal of the RAS\n\\newcommand\\sci{Science} % Science\n\\newcommand\\skytel{Sky \\& Telesc.} % Sky and Telescope\n\\newcommand\\solphys{Sol.~Phys.} % Solar Physics\n\\newcommand\\sovast{Soviet~Ast.} % Soviet Astronomy (aka Astronomy Reports)\n\\newcommand\\ssr{Space Sci. Rev.} % Space Science Reviews\n\\newcommand\\zap{Z.~Astrophys.} % Zeitschrift fuer Astrophysik\n\n%%%Command to produce a box around selected text\n%%%NB This is for use in the file mnras_guide only -- it is NOT\n%%% to be used in the journal\n\\newcommand{\\boxit}[1]{%\n \\noindent\\fbox{%\n \\begin{minipage}[]{84mm}#1\\end{minipage}\n }\n}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% End of Extra Math / Symbol code %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n% ****************************************\n% * PAGE LAYOUT *\n% ****************************************\n%\n% SIDE MARGINS:\n\\if@twocolumn\n \\setlength\\oddsidemargin{-2.5pc}\n \\setlength\\evensidemargin{-2.5pc}\n\\else\n \\ifSFB@referee\n \\setlength\\oddsidemargin{\\z@}\n \\setlength\\evensidemargin{\\z@}\n \\else\n \\setlength\\oddsidemargin{-2pc}\n \\setlength\\evensidemargin{-2pc}\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\\setlength\\marginparwidth{4pc}\n\\setlength\\marginparsep{0.5pc}\n\n% VERTICAL SPACING:\n%\\if@twocolumn\n \\setlength\\topmargin{-2pc}\n%\\else\n \\setlength\\topmargin{-4pc}\n%\\fi\n\\setlength{\\headheight}{14pt}\n\\setlength{\\headsep} {15pt}\n\\setlength{\\topskip} {9pt}\n\\setlength{\\footskip} {22pt} %was 26 pt\n%\n% DIMENSION OF TEXT: % SFB 0.1.01\n%\n\\newdimen\\SFB@measure\n\\SFB@measure 508pt%42pc\n%\n\\setlength\\textheight{682pt}\n\\setlength\\textwidth{\\SFB@measure}\n%\n\\ifSFB@landscape\n \\setlength\\textwidth{\\textheight}\n \\setlength\\textheight{\\SFB@measure}\n\\fi\n\\ifSFB@referee\n \\setlength\\textwidth{39pc}\n\\fi\n\\setlength\\columnsep{20pt}%{2pc}\n\\setlength\\columnseprule{0pt}\n\n% FOOTNOTES:\n\\setlength\\footnotesep{6pt}\n\\setlength\\skip{\\footins 19.5pt plus 12pt minus 1pt}\n\n% FLOATS:\n\\setlength\\floatsep{ 12pt plus 5.5pt minus 1pt}\n\\setlength\\textfloatsep{ 12pt plus 7.5pt}\n\\setlength\\intextsep{ 12pt plus 5.5pt minus 2pt}\n\\setlength\\dblfloatsep{ 12pt plus 5.5pt minus 2pt }\n\\setlength\\dbltextfloatsep{ 15pt plus 4.5pt minus 3pt}\n\\setlength\\@fptop{ 0pt plus 0fil}\n\\setlength\\@fpsep{ 12pt plus 0fil }\n\\setlength\\@fpbot{ 0pt plus 0fil }\n\\setlength\\@dblfptop{ 0pt plus 0fil}\n\\setlength\\@dblfpsep{ 12pt plus 0fil}\n\\setlength\\@dblfpbot{ 0pt plus 0fil}\n\\setlength\\marginparpush{ 5pt }\n\n% ****************************************\n% * PARAGRAPHING *\n% ****************************************\n%\n\\newlength{\\realparindent} % needed for abstract\n\\setlength\\parskip{ \\z@ plus .1pt }\n\\setlength\\parindent{9pt}\n\\setlength{\\realparindent}{\\parindent}\n\\setlength\\partopsep{ 0pt plus 1pt }\n\\@lowpenalty 51\n\\@medpenalty 151\n\\@highpenalty 301\n\\@beginparpenalty -\\@lowpenalty\n\\@endparpenalty -\\@lowpenalty\n\\@itempenalty -\\@lowpenalty\n\\clubpenalty=0\n\\widowpenalty=10000\n\n% ****************************************\n% * PARTS & SECTIONS NUMBERS *\n% ****************************************\n%\n\\newcounter {part}\n\\newcounter {section}\n\\newcounter {subsection}[section]\n\\newcounter {subsubsection}[subsection]\n\\newcounter {paragraph}[subsubsection]\n\\newcounter {subparagraph}[paragraph]\n\\def\\thepart {\\arabic{part}}\n\\def\\thesection {\\arabic{section}}\n\\def\\thesubsection {\\thesection.\\arabic{subsection}}\n\\def\\thesubsubsection {\\thesubsection.\\arabic{subsubsection}}\n\\def\\theparagraph {\\thesubsubsection.\\arabic{paragraph}}\n\\def\\thesubparagraph {\\theparagraph.\\arabic{subparagraph}}\n\n%%%Additional material below is from GJI class file\n% Sometimes people want to number equations by section, rather than\n% sequentially through the whole paper.\n\n% Removed - \\numberwithin{equation}{section} already does this!\n\n% ****************************************\n% * PARTS *\n% ****************************************\n%\n\\def\\part{\\par \\addvspace{4ex}\\@afterindentfalse\n \\secdef\\@part\\@spart}\n\\def\\@part[#1]#2{\\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\m@ne\n \\refstepcounter{part}\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{part}{Part \\thepart: #1}\n \\else \\addcontentsline{toc}{part}{#1}\n \\fi\n {\\parindent 0pt \\raggedright\n \\ifnum \\c@secnumdepth >\\m@ne\n \\reset@font\\large\\rm PART\n \\ifcase\\thepart \\or ONE \\or TWO \\or THREE \\or FOUR \\or FIVE\n \\or SIX \\or SEVEN \\or EIGHT \\or NINE \\or TEN \\else \\fi\n \\par \\nobreak\n \\fi\n \\reset@font\\LARGE \\rm #2 \\markboth{}{}\\par }\n \\nobreak \\vskip 3ex \\@afterheading}\n\\def\\@spart#1{{\\parindent 0pt \\raggedright\n \\reset@font\\LARGE \\rm #1\\par}\n \\nobreak \\vskip 3ex \\@afterheading}\n\n% ****************************************\n% * SECTIONS *\n% ****************************************\n%\n% \\@startsection modified to leave less space before \\subsection\n% if it immediately follows \\section\n\n% \\@startsection {NAME}{LEVEL}{INDENT}{BEFORESKIP}{AFTERSKIP}{STYLE}\n\n\\newif\\if@levelone\n\n\\def\\@startsection#1#2#3#4#5#6{\\if@noskipsec \\leavevmode \\fi\n \\par \\@tempskipa #4\\relax\n \\@afterindenttrue\n \\ifnum #2=\\@ne % if level=1 ie. section\n \\global\\@levelonetrue\n \\else\n \\global\\@levelonefalse\n \\fi\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa <\\z@ \\@tempskipa -\\@tempskipa \\@afterindentfalse\\fi\n \\if@nobreak\n \\everypar{}\\ifnum#2=2 \\vskip 0pt plus1pt\\fi % was 6pt\n \\else\n \\addpenalty{\\@secpenalty}\\addvspace{\\@tempskipa}\n \\fi \\@ifstar\n {\\@ssect{#3}{#4}{#5}{#6}}{\\@dblarg{\\@sect{#1}{#2}{#3}{#4}{#5}{#6}}}}\n\n\\def\\SFB@hangraggedright{\\rightskip=\\@flushglue \\let\\\\=\\@centercr \\parindent=0pt}\n\n\\newif\\if@firstsection\n\\@firstsectiontrue\n\\def\\section{%\n \\if@firstsection \\fixfootnotes\\@firstsectionfalse \\fi%\n \\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}\n {-24pt plus -12pt minus -1pt}{6pt}\n {\\SFB@hangraggedright\\reset@font\\normalsize\\bf}}\n\\def\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}\n {-18pt plus -9pt minus -1pt}{6pt}\n {\\SFB@hangraggedright\\reset@font\\normalsize\\bf}}\n\\def\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}\n {-18pt plus -9pt minus -1pt}{6pt}\n {\\SFB@hangraggedright\\reset@font\\normalsize\\it}}\n\\def\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}\n {12pt plus 2.25pt minus 1pt}{-0.5em}{\\reset@font\\normalsize\\bf}}\n\\def\\subparagraph{\\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\\parindent}\n {12pt plus 2.25pt minus 1pt}{-0.5em}{\\reset@font\\normalsize\\it}}\n\\setcounter{secnumdepth}{4} % SFB 0.1.01\n%\n% \\@sect{NAME}{LEVEL}{INDENT}{BEFORESKIP}{AFTERSKIP}{STYLE}[ARG1]{ARG2}\n\\def\\@sect#1#2#3#4#5#6[#7]#8{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth\n \\def\\@svsec{}%\n \\else\n \\refstepcounter{#1}%\n \\if@levelone % is it a \\section or \\section*\n \\ifSFB@appendix\n \\edef\\@svsec{}%\n \\else\n \\edef\\@svsec{\\csname the#1\\endcsname\\hskip .5em}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\edef\\@svsec{\\csname the#1\\endcsname\\hskip .5em}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\@tempskipa #5\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n \\begingroup #6\\relax\n \\if@levelone\n \\ifSFB@appendix\n \\@hangfrom{\\hskip #3\\relax\\@svsec}{\\interlinepenalty \\@M\n APPENDIX \\csname the#1\\endcsname:\\hskip 0.5em\\uppercase{#8}\\par}%\n \\else\n \\@hangfrom{\\hskip #3\\relax\\@svsec}{\\interlinepenalty \\@M\n \\uppercase{#8}\\par}%\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\@hangfrom{\\hskip #3\\relax\\@svsec}{\\interlinepenalty \\@M #8\\par}%\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{\\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else %ajw\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}\\fi #7}%ajw\n \\else\n \\def\\@svsechd{#6\\hskip #3\\@svsec \\if@levelone \\uppercase{#8}\\else #8\\fi\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{\\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else %ajw\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}\\fi#7}%ajw\n }\\fi\n \\@xsect{#5}}\n\n% from latex.tex\n% \\@ssect{INDENT}{BEFORESKIP}{AFTERSKIP}{STYLE}{ARG}\n\\def\\@ssect#1#2#3#4#5{%\n \\@tempskipa #3\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n \\begingroup #4\\@hangfrom{\\hskip #1}{%\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M\n \\if@levelone\n \\uppercase{#5}%\n \\else {#5}%\n \\fi\\par}%\n \\endgroup\n \\else\n \\def\\@svsechd{#4\\hskip #1\\relax\n \\if@levelone\n \\uppercase{#5}%\n \\else {#5}%\n \\fi}\n \\fi\n \\@xsect{#3}%\n}\n\n\\newif\\ifSFB@appendix\n\\def\\appendix{\\par\n \\SFB@appendixtrue\n \\@addtoreset{equation}{section}\n \\@addtoreset{table}{section}\n \\@addtoreset{figure}{section}\n \\setcounter{section}{0}\n \\setcounter{equation}{0}\n \\setcounter{figure}{0}\n \\setcounter{table}{0}\n \\def\\thesection{\\Alph{section}}\n \\renewcommand\\thesubsection{\\thesection\\arabic{subsection}}\n \\renewcommand\\theequation{\\thesection\\arabic{equation}}\n \\renewcommand\\thefigure{\\thesection\\@arabic\\c@figure}\n \\renewcommand\\thetable{\\thesection\\@arabic\\c@table}\n \\renewcommand{\\theHsection}{A\\arabic{section}} % for hyperref links\n}\n\n% ****************************************\n% * SKIPS *\n% ****************************************\n%\n\\newskip\\@indentskip\n\\newskip\\smallindent\n\\newskip\\@footindent\n\\newskip\\@leftskip\n\\@indentskip=18pt\n\\smallindent=1.5em\n\\@footindent=\\smallindent\n\\@leftskip=\\z@\n\n% ****************************************\n% * LISTS *\n% ****************************************\n%\n\\setlength\\leftmargini{ \\z@ }\n\\setlength\\leftmarginii{ 1em }\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiii{ 1em }\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiv{ 1em }\n\\setlength\\leftmarginv{ 1pc }\n\\setlength\\leftmarginvi{ 1pc }\n\\setlength\\leftmargin{\\leftmargini}\n\\setlength\\labelsep{ 0.5em}\n\\labelwidth\\leftmargini\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n%\n% label macros for Range-Left and Range-Right labels\n\\def\\makeRLlabel#1{\\rlap{#1}\\hss}\n\\def\\makeRRlabel#1{\\hss\\llap{#1}}\n\\def\\makenewlabel#1{#1}\n%\n\\def\\@listI{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\topsep 6pt plus 1pt minus 1pt\n \\itemsep \\z@ plus .1pt\n}\n\\let\\@listi\\@listI\n\\@listi\n\\def\\@listii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\n \\topsep 6pt plus 1pt minus 1pt\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\itemsep \\z@ plus .1pt\n}\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\n \\topsep 6pt plus 1pt minus 1pt\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\partopsep \\z@\n \\itemsep \\topsep\n}\n\\def\\@listiv{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiv\n}\n\\def\\@listv{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginv\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n}\n\\def\\@listvi{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginvi\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginvi\\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n}\n%\n% ITEMIZE\n\\def\\itemize{%\n \\ifnum \\@itemdepth >3 \\@toodeep\n \\else \\advance\\@itemdepth \\@ne\n \\edef\\@itemitem{labelitem\\romannumeral\\the\\@itemdepth}%\n \\list{\\csname\\@itemitem\\endcsname}%\n {\\let\\makelabel\\makeRRlabel}%\n \\parindent 1em%\n \\leftmargin 3.5em\\labelsep 0.5em\\itemindent 2.0em\\labelwidth 0.5em%\n \\fi}\n\\def\\labelitemi{$\\bullet$}\n\\def\\labelitemii{--}\n\\def\\labelitemiii{$\\cdot$}\n\\def\\labelitemiv{*}\n%\n% ENUMERATE\n% SFB -- enumerate with optional argument to set left margin...\n\\def\\enumerate{\\ifnum \\@enumdepth >3 \\@toodeep \\else\n \\advance\\@enumdepth \\@ne\n \\edef\\@enumctr{enum\\romannumeral\\the\\@enumdepth}%\n \\fi\n \\@ifnextchar [{\\@enumeratetwo}{\\@enumerateone}%\n}\n\\def\\@enumeratetwo[#1]{%\n \\list{\\csname label\\@enumctr\\endcsname}%\n {\\settowidth\\labelwidth{[#1]}\n \\leftmargin\\z@\n \\listparindent 1em\n \\usecounter{\\@enumctr}\n \\let\\makelabel\\makenewlabel}\n}\n\\def\\@enumerateone{%\n \\list{\\csname label\\@enumctr\\endcsname}%\n {\\usecounter{\\@enumctr}\\itemindent 1em\\listparindent 1em\n \\let\\makelabel\\makenewlabel}}\n%\n\\def\\labelenumi{\\theenumi}\n\\def\\theenumi{(\\roman{enumi})}\n\\def\\labelenumii{\\theenumii}\n\\def\\theenumii{(\\alph{enumii})}\n\\def\\p@enumii{\\theenumi}\n\\def\\labelenumiii{\\theenumiii}\n\\def\\theenumiii{(\\arabic{enumiii})}\n\\def\\p@enumiii{\\theenumi(\\theenumii)}\n\\def\\labelenumiv{\\theenumiv}\n\\def\\theenumiv{(\\Alph{enumiv})}\n\\def\\p@enumiv{\\p@enumiii\\theenumiii}\n%\n% DESCRIPTION\n\\def\\descriptionlabel#1{\\reset@font\\bf #1}\n\\def\\description{\\list{}{\\labelwidth\\z@\n \\leftmargin \\z@\n \\itemindent 1em\n}}\n\\let\\enddescription\\endlist\n\n% ****************************************\n% * DISPLAYED TEXT *\n% ****************************************\n%\n% VERSE\n\\def\\verse{\\let\\\\=\\@centercr\n \\list{}{\\itemsep\\z@\n \\itemindent -\\@indentskip\n \\listparindent \\itemindent\n \\rightmargin\\leftmargin\n \\advance\\leftmargin \\@indentskip}\\item[]}\n\\let\\endverse\\endlist\n%\n% QUOTATION\n\\def\\quotation{\\list{}{\\listparindent \\smallindent\n% \\itemindent\\listparindent\n \\leftmargin\\z@\\rightmargin\\leftmargin\n \\parsep 0pt plus 1pt}\\item[]\\reset@font\\small}\n\\let\\endquotation=\\endlist\n%\n% QUOTE\n\\def\\quote{\\list{}{\\leftmargin\\z@\\rightmargin\\leftmargin}\\item[]%\n \\reset@font\\small}\n\\let\\endquote=\\endlist\n%\n% BSL QUOTE\n\\newenvironment{lquote}{\\begin{list}{}%\n {\\setlength{\\leftmargin}{2em}}\n \\item[]}\n {\\end{list}}\n%\n% ****************************************\n% * OTHER ENVIRONMENTS *\n% ****************************************\n%\n% THEOREM\n\\def\\@begintheorem#1#2{\\reset@font\\rm \\trivlist \\item[\\hskip \\labelsep\n {\\reset@font\\bf #1\\ #2.}]}\n\\def\\@opargbegintheorem#1#2#3{\\reset@font\\rm \\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip \\labelsep{\\reset@font\\bf #1\\ #2.\\ (#3)}]}\n\\def\\@endtheorem{\\endtrivlist}\n%\n% PROOF\n\\def\\proof{\\reset@font\\rm \\trivlist \\item[\\hskip \\labelsep\n {\\reset@font\\it Proof.}]}\n\\def\\endproof{\\hspace*{1em}{\\begin{picture}(6.5,6.5)%\n \\put(0,0){\\framebox(6.5,6.5){}}\\end{picture}}\\endtrivlist}\n\\@namedef{proof*}{\\reset@font\\rm \\trivlist \\item[\\hskip \\labelsep\n {\\reset@font\\it Proof.}]}\n\\@namedef{endproof*}{\\endtrivlist}\n\\def\\proofbox{\\begin{picture}(6.5,6.5)%\n \\put(0,0){\\framebox(6.5,6.5){}}\\end{picture}}\n%\n% TITLEPAGE\n\\def\\titlepage{\\@restonecolfalse\\if@twocolumn\\@restonecoltrue\\onecolumn\n \\else \\newpage \\fi \\thispagestyle{empty}\\c@page\\z@}\n\\def\\endtitlepage{\\if@restonecol\\twocolumn \\else \\newpage \\fi}\n\n% ARRAY AND TABULAR\n%\n\\arraycolsep 5pt\n\\tabcolsep 6pt\n\\arrayrulewidth .5pt\n\\doublerulesep 1.5pt\n\n\\def\\tabular{\\def\\@halignto{}\n \\def\\hline{\\noalign{\\ifnum0=`}\\fi\n \\vskip 3pt\n \\hrule \\@height \\arrayrulewidth\n \\vskip 3pt\n \\futurelet \\@tempa\\@xhline}\n \\def\\fullhline{\\noalign{\\ifnum0=`}\\fi\n \\vskip 3pt\n \\hrule \\@height \\arrayrulewidth\n \\vskip 3pt\n \\futurelet \\@tempa\\@xhline}\n \\def\\@xhline{\\ifx\\@tempa\\hline\n \\vskip -6pt\n \\vskip \\doublerulesep\n \\fi\n \\ifnum0=`{\\fi}}\n \\def\\@arrayrule{\\@addtopreamble{\\hskip -.5\\arrayrulewidth\n% \\vrule \\@width \\arrayrulewidth\n \\hskip .5\\arrayrulewidth}}\n\\@tabular\n}\n% TABBING\n%\n\\tabbingsep \\labelsep\n\n% MINIPAGE\n%\n\\skip\\@mpfootins = \\skip\\footins\n\n% FRAMEBOX\n%\n% Space left between box and text by \\fbox and \\framebox.\n\\fboxsep = 3pt\n% Width of rules in box made by \\fbox and \\framebox.\n\\fboxrule = \\arrayrulewidth\n\n% ****************************************\n% * TITLE AND ABSTRACT *\n% ****************************************\n%\n\\def\\maketitle{\\par\n \\begingroup\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\twocolumn[\\vspace*{17pt}\\@maketitle]\n \\else\n \\newpage\n \\global\\@topnum\\z@\n \\@maketitle\n \\fi\n \\thispagestyle{titlepage}\n \\endgroup\n \\let\\maketitle\\relax\n \\let\\@maketitle\\relax\n \\gdef\\@author{}\n \\gdef\\@title{}\n \\let\\thanks\\relax\n}\n\\def\\newauthor{% DE's definitions\n \\end{tabular}\\par\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l@{}}\\let\\\\=\\author@nextline%\n}\n\\def\\and{%\n \\end{tabular}\\vskip 3pt\\par\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l@{}}\\let\\\\=\\author@nextline%\n}\n\\def\\@maketitle{\\newpage\n \\vspace*{7pt}\n {\\raggedright \\sloppy\n {\\reset@font\\huge \\bf \\@title \\par}\n \\vskip 16pt\n {\\reset@font\\LARGE\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{@{}l@{}}\\let\\\\=\\author@nextline\\@author%\n \\end{tabular}\n \\par}\n \\vskip 22pt\n } %End of DE's definitions\n \\par\\noindent\n {\\reset@font\\small \\@date \\par}\n \\vskip 22pt\n}\n\n\\def\\author@nextline{% %DE's definition\n\\tabularnewline[-5pt]\\reset@font\\small\\it\\ignorespaces\\unskip\\unskip\\unskip%\n\\let\\\\=\\author@nextline}% %let command added by NT to bring\n % subsequent lines into correct format\n\n%\n\\def\\abstract{\\if@twocolumn\n \\start@SFBbox\\@abstract\n \\else\n \\@abstract\n \\fi}\n\\def\\endabstract{\\if@twocolumn\n \\endlist\\finish@SFBbox\n \\else\n \\endlist\n \\fi}\n\\def\\@abstract{\\list{}{%\n \\listparindent\\realparindent\n \\itemindent\\z@\n \\labelwidth\\z@ \\labelsep\\z@\n \\leftmargin\\z@\\rightmargin\\z@%%was 11pc left\n \\parsep 0pt plus 1pt}\\item[]%\n \\reset@font\\normalsize{\\bf ABSTRACT}\\\\\\reset@font\\abslarge\n} % SFB 0.1.01\n%\n\\newif\\ifSFB@keywords\n\\def\\keywords{\\if@twocolumn\n \\start@SFBbox\\@keywords\n \\else\n \\@keywords\n \\fi\n}\n\\def\\@keywords{\\list{}{%\n \\labelwidth\\z@ \\labelsep\\z@\n \\leftmargin\\z@\\rightmargin\\z@ %was 11pc left was 11pc\\right....\n \\parsep 0pt plus 1pt}\\item[]\\reset@font\\abslarge{\\bf Key words: }%\n}\n\\def\\endkeywords{\\if@twocolumn\n \\endlist\\addvspace{37pt plus 0.5\\baselineskip}\\finish@SFBbox\n \\else\n \\endlist\n \\fi\n \\@thanks\n \\gdef\\@thanks{}\n \\SFB@keywordstrue\n}\n\\def\\nokeywords{\\ifSFB@keywords\\else\n \\if@twocolumn \\start@SFBbox\\addvspace{37pt}\\finish@SFBbox \\fi\n \\@thanks\n \\gdef\\@thanks{}\\fi\n}\n\n\\def\\author@tabular{\\def\\@halignto{}\\@authortable}\n\\let\\endauthor@tabular=\\endtabular\n%\n\\def\\author@tabcrone{\\vspace{2pt}{\\ifnum0=`}\\fi%\n \\@xtabularcr[-7pt]\\reset@font\\small\\it\n \\let\\\\=\\author@tabcrtwo\\ignorespaces}\n%\n\\def\\author@tabcrtwo{{\\ifnum0=`}\\fi\\@xtabularcr[-7pt]\\reset@font\\small\\it\n \\let\\\\=\\author@tabcrtwo\\ignorespaces}\n%\n\\def\\@authortable{\\leavevmode \\hbox \\bgroup $\\let\\@acol\\@tabacol\n \\let\\@classz\\@tabclassz \\let\\@classiv\\@tabclassiv\n \\let\\\\=\\author@tabcrone\\ignorespaces \\@tabarray}\n\n\\def\\start@SFBbox{\\@next\\@currbox\\@freelist{}{}%\n \\global\\setbox\\@currbox\n \\vbox\\bgroup\n \\hsize \\textwidth\n \\@parboxrestore\n}\n\\def\\finish@SFBbox{\\par\\vskip -\\dbltextfloatsep\n \\egroup\n \\global\\count\\@currbox\\tw@\n \\global\\@dbltopnum\\@ne\n \\global\\@dbltoproom\\maxdimen\\@addtodblcol\n \\global\\vsize\\@colht\n \\global\\@colroom\\@colht\n}\n\n% ****************************************\n% * PAGE STYLES *\n% ****************************************\n%\n\\mark{{}{}}\n\\gdef\\@author{\\mbox{}}\n\\def\\author{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@authortwo}{\\@authorone}}\n\\def\\@authortwo[#1]#2{\\gdef\\@author{#2}\\gdef\\@shortauthor{#1}}\n\\def\\@authorone#1{\\gdef\\@author{#1}\\gdef\\@shortauthor{#1}}\n\\gdef\\@shortauthor{}\n\\gdef\\@title{\\mbox{}}\n\\def\\title{\\@ifnextchar [{\\@titletwo}{\\@titleone}}\n\\def\\@titletwo[#1]#2{\\gdef\\@title{#2}\\gdef\\@shorttitle{#1}}\n\\def\\@titleone#1{\\gdef\\@title{#1}\\gdef\\@shorttitle{#1}}\n\\gdef\\@shorttitle{}\n\\def\\volume#1{\\gdef\\@volume{#1}}\n\\gdef\\@volume{000}\n\\def\\tod@y{\\today}\n\\def\\microfiche#1{\\gdef\\@microfiche{#1}}\n\\gdef\\@microfiche{}\n\\def\\pubyear#1{\\gdef\\@pubyear{#1}}\n\\gdef\\@pubyear{0000}\n\\def\\pagerange#1{\\gdef\\@pagerange{#1}}\n\\gdef\\@pagerange{000--000}\n\\def\\journal#1{\\gdef\\@journal{#1}}\n\\def\\plate#1{\\gdef\\pl@te{#1}}\n\\ifx\\CUP@mtlplain@loaded\\undefined\n \\def\\@printed{Preprint \\tod@y\\\n \\qquad\\qquad\\qquad Compiled using MNRAS \\LaTeX\\ style file v\\@version} % manual spacing isn't ideal\n\\else\n \\def\\@printed{}\n\\fi\n\\gdef\\@journal{{MNRAS} {\\bf \\@volume}, \\@pagerange\\\n% (\\number\\year) \\@microfiche\\@printed}\n (\\@pubyear) \\@microfiche \\hfill \\@printed}\n%\n% \\ps@empty and \\ps@plain defined in LATEX.TEX\n%\n\\def\\@ddell{}\n\\if@letters\n \\def\\@ddell{L}\n\\fi\n\n% Headers and footers\n\n\\def\\ps@headings{\\let\\@mkboth\\markboth\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\Large\\hfill{\\it\\@shorttitle}\\hspace{1.5em}%\n \\rm\\@ddell\\thepage}\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\hfill\\small MNRAS {\\bf \\@volume}, \\@pagerange\\ (\\@pubyear)}\n \\def\\@evenhead{\\Large\\@ddell\\thepage\\hspace{1.5em}\\it\\@shortauthor\\hfill}\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\small MNRAS {\\bf \\@volume}, \\@pagerange\\ (\\@pubyear)\\hfil}\n \\def\\sectionmark##1{\\markboth{##1}{}}\n \\def\\subsectionmark##1{\\markright{##1}}}\n\n\\def\\ps@myheadings{\\let\\@mkboth\\@gobbletwo\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\Large\\hfill\\it\\rightmark\\hspace{1.5em}\\rm\\@ddell\\thepage}\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\small MNRAS {\\bf \\@volume}, \\@pagerange\\ (\\@pubyear)\\hfil}\n \\def\\@evenhead{\\Large\\@ddell\\thepage\\hspace{1.5em}\\it\\leftmark\\hfill}\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\hfil\\small MNRAS {\\bf \\@volume}, \\@pagerange\\ (\\@pubyear)}\n \\def\\sectionmark##1{}\n \\def\\subsectionmark##1{}}\n\n\\def\\ps@titlepage{\\let\\@mkboth\\@gobbletwo\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\footnotesize\\@journal}\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\small\\copyright\\ \\@pubyear\\ The Authors\\hfil}\n \\def\\@evenhead{\\footnotesize\\@journal\\hfill}\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\hfil\\small\\copyright\\ \\@pubyear\\ The Authors}\n \\def\\sectionmark##1{}\n \\def\\subsectionmark##1{}}\n\n\\def\\ps@plate{\\let\\@mkboth\\@gobbletwo\n \\def\\@oddhead{\\footnotesize\\pl@te\\hfill}\n \\def\\@oddfoot{\\small MNRAS {\\bf \\@volume}, \\@pagerange\\ (\\@pubyear)\\hfil}\n \\def\\@evenhead{\\footnotesize\\pl@te\\hfill}\n \\def\\@evenfoot{\\hfil\\small MNRAS {\\bf \\@volume}, \\@pagerange\\ (\\@pubyear)}\n}\n\n% ****************************************\n% * TABLE OF CONTENTS, ETC. *\n% ****************************************\n%\n\\def\\@pnumwidth{1.55em}\n\\def\\@tocrmarg {2.55em}\n\\def\\@dotsep{4.5}\n\\setcounter{tocdepth}{2}\n\\def\\@undottedtocline#1#2#3#4#5{\\ifnum #1>\\c@tocdepth\n \\else\n \\vskip \\z@ plus .2pt\n {\\hangindent #2\\relax\n \\rightskip \\@tocrmarg \\parfillskip -\\rightskip\n \\parindent #2\\relax \\@afterindenttrue\n \\interlinepenalty\\@M \\leavevmode\n \\@tempdima #3\\relax #4\\nobreak \\hfill \\nobreak\n \\hbox to\\@pnumwidth{\\hfil\\reset@font\\rm \\ }\\par}\\fi}\n\\def\\tableofcontents{\\@restonecolfalse\n \\if@twocolumn\\@restonecoltrue\\onecolumn\\fi\n \\section*{CONTENTS} \\@starttoc{toc}\n \\if@restonecol\\twocolumn\\fi \\par\\vspace{12pt}}\n\\def\\l@part#1#2{\\addpenalty{-\\@highpenalty}\n \\addvspace{2.25em plus 1pt}\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@ \\rightskip \\@pnumwidth\n \\parfillskip -\\@pnumwidth\n {\\reset@font\\normalsize\\rm\n \\leavevmode \\hspace*{3pc}\n #1\\hfil \\hbox to\\@pnumwidth{\\hss \\ }}\\par\n \\nobreak \\global\\@nobreaktrue\n \\everypar{\\global\\@nobreakfalse\\everypar{}}\\endgroup}\n\\def\\l@section#1#2{\\addpenalty{\\@secpenalty}\n \\@tempdima 1.5em\n \\begingroup\n \\parindent \\z@ \\rightskip \\@pnumwidth\n \\parfillskip -\\@pnumwidth \\reset@font\\rm \\leavevmode\n \\advance\\leftskip\\@tempdima \\hskip -\\leftskip\n #1\\nobreak\\hfil \\nobreak\\hbox to\\@pnumwidth{\\hss \\ }\\par\n \\endgroup}\n\\def\\l@subsection{\\@undottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}\n\\def\\l@subsubsection{\\@undottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}\n\\def\\l@paragraph{\\@undottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}\n\\def\\l@subparagraph{\\@undottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}\n\\def\\listoffigures{\\@restonecolfalse\n \\if@twocolumn\\@restonecoltrue\\onecolumn\\fi\n \\section*{LIST OF FIGURES\\@mkboth{LIST OF FIGURES}{LIST OF FIGURES}}\n \\@starttoc{lof} \\if@restonecol\\twocolumn\\fi}\n\\def\\l@figure{\\@undottedtocline{1}{1.5em}{2.3em}}\n\\def\\listoftables{\\@restonecolfalse\n \\if@twocolumn\\@restonecoltrue\\onecolumn\\fi\n \\section*{LIST OF TABLES\\@mkboth{LIST OF TABLES}{LIST OF TABLES}}\n \\@starttoc{lot} \\if@restonecol\\twocolumn\\fi}\n\\let\\l@table\\l@figure\n% ****************************************\n% * BIBLIOGRAPHY *\n% ****************************************\n%\n\n\\def\\thebibliography#1{\\section*{REFERENCES}\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{REFERENCES}\n % KTS: most of this stuff gets over-written by natbib below, so\n % I don't think it does anything.\n \\newcounter{dummy}\n \\list{}{\\usecounter{dummy}%\n \\labelwidth \\z@\n \\leftmargin 0em %1.5em\n\t\t \\bibhang \\z@\n \\itemsep \\z@\n \\itemindent-\\leftmargin}\n \\reset@font\\footnotesize\n \\parindent\\z@\n \\parskip\\z@ plus .1pt\\relax\n \\def\\newblock{}%\\hskip .11em plus .33em minus .07em}\n \\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000\n \\sfcode`\\.=1000\\relax\n}\n\\let\\endthebibliography=\\endlist\n\\def\\@biblabel#1{\\hspace*{\\labelsep}[#1]}\n\n\\if@usenatbib%\n \\def\\newblock{\\hskip .11em plus .33em minus .07em}\n \\usepackage[authoryear]{natbib}\n \\bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}\n % Re-define these in upper case as natbib.sty has them capitalised\n \\renewcommand\\bibname{BIBLIOGRAPHY}\n \\renewcommand\\refname{REFERENCES}\n\\fi\n\n% Natbib has overwritten a bunch of settings, so redfine them\n% Works both with and without natbib (in theory)\n\\let\\originalbib\\thebibliography\n\\renewcommand{\\thebibliography}{\\labelwidth \\z@ \\bibhang 1.5em \\footnotesize \\originalbib}\n% The typesetters actually use a 12pt bibhang, but with 8pt text this is 1.5em\n\n% new column specifiers to be used with dcolumn\n\\if@usedcolumn%\n \\usepackage{dcolumn}\n \\newcolumntype{d}[1]{D{.}{.}{#1}}\n \\newcolumntype{.}{D{.}{.}{-1}}\n \\newcolumntype{,}{D{,}{,}{2}}\n\\fi\n\n\n% ****************************************\n% * COMMANDS FOR USE WITH MNRAS.BST *\n% ****************************************\n%\n% The following three macros provide auxiliary support for the BibTeX\n% wranglings in mnras.bst. They provide support for functionality\n% which it is impossible, or at least unmaintainably arcane, to\n% provide within BibTeX Style Language.\n%\n% These definitions can be loaded as a package or, probably better,\n% should be incorporated into a mnras.cls file.\n%\n% These depend on the presence of a \\href{URL}{text} macro, as\n% provided by the hyperref package. The mnras.bst style depends\n% additionally on the \\url{URL} macro, which hyperref also provides.\n%\n% If the hyperref package is not included, then suitable defaults are\n%\n% \\def\\href#1#2{#2}\n% \\def\\@url#1{#1\\endgroup}\n% \\def\\url{\\begingroup\\@urlcharsother \\ttfamily \\@url}\n%\n% These must appear _after_ this package is loaded, and should appear\n% _instead_ of loading the hyperref package (it'll probably be OK to\n% let the hyperref package redefine these, but that is to tempt fate).\n\n\n% \\@urlcharsother\n%\n% 'Other' some characters which may appear in DOIs and URIs.\n%\n% All of the characters here may appear in URIs, except for '^' and '\\'.\n%\n% There appear to be almost no restrictions on what characters appear\n% in DOIs (or at least none discovereable in ISO 26324:2012, which\n% says simply that the 'DOI suffix' is \"a character string of any\n% length\". A DOI registrant which uses characters outside ASCII plus\n% the following set, is a DOI registrant who should be taken outside\n% and challenged on their taste.\n%\n% The following list is not simply \\dospecials, because that includes\n% '{' and '}', which we need. And if they're in a DOI... well.\n\\def\\@urlcharsother{%\n \\let\\do\\@makeother \n \\do\\\\\\do\\$\\do\\&\\do\\#\\do\\^\\do\\_\\do\\%\\do\\~}\n\n% \\doi\n%\n% \\doi{10.foo} formats the DOI in the argument, and provides a link to dx.doi.org.\n% \\doi[text]{10.foo} formats the DOI 10.foo, but provides 'text' as the link.\n% The DOI can contain {\\$&#^_%~} (though there's not necessarily a\n% guarantee that these will still work as URL characters within the PDF)\n\\def\\doi{\\begingroup\n \\@urlcharsother\n \\@ifnextchar[%\n {\\@doi}\n {\\@doi[]}}\n\\def\\@doi[#1]#2{%\n \\def\\@tempa{#1}%\n \\ifx\\@tempa\\@empty\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/#2}{doi:#2}%\n \\else\n \\href{http://dx.doi.org/#2}{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n }\n\n% \\eprint\n%\n% \\eprint{defaultArchivePrefix}{id} expands to a link to the given ID\n% at a suitable archive. The 'id' can be either a bare ID (such as\n% yymm.1234) for arXiv, or can include an archive prefix. If there is\n% no prefix in the 'id', then 'defaultArchivePrefix' supplies a default.\n%\n% Thus\n% \\eprint{}{arXiv:yymm.1234} -> \\href{http://arxiv.org/abs/yymm.1234}{arXiv:yymm.1234}\n% \\eprint{}{yymm.1234} -> same as \\eprint{}{arXiv:yymm.1234}\n% \\eprint{arXiv}{arXiv:yymm.1234} -> same\n% \\eprint{dblp}{1234} -> \\href{http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/1234.xml}{dblp:1234}\n% \\eprint{dblp}{arXiv:yymm.1234} -> same as \\eprint{}{arXiv:yymm.1234}\n% \\eprint{}{wibble:1234} -> wibble:1234 (doesn't match anything)\n%\n% A prefix 'PFX' is 'registered' by defining a macro\n% \\@eprint@PFX#1{...} which formats the identifier (that is, \\eprint's\n% second argument _minus_ any colon-terminated prefix).\n\\def\\eprint#1#2{%\n \\@eprint#1:#2::\\@nil}\n\\def\\@eprint@arXiv#1{\\href{http://arxiv.org/abs/#1}{{\\tt arXiv:#1}}}\n\\def\\@eprint@dblp#1{\\href{http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/#1.xml}{dblp:#1}}\n\\def\\@eprint#1:#2:#3:#4\\@nil{%\n \\def\\@tempa{#1}%\n \\def\\@tempb{#2}%\n \\def\\@tempc{#3}%\n \\ifx\\@tempc\\@empty\n \\let\\@tempc\\@tempb\n \\let\\@tempb\\@tempa\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@tempb\\@empty\n % default to arXiv\n \\def\\@tempb{arXiv}%\n \\fi\n % If \\@tempb is a 'recognised' prefix, then call it, otherwise, just\n % print prefix:id and be done with it. A prefix is 'recognised' if\n % there's a macro \\@eprint@<prefix>.\n \\@ifundefined{@eprint@\\@tempb}\n {\\@tempb:\\@tempc}\n % or call macro '@eprint@\\@tempb' on the argument \\@tempc\n {\\expandafter\\expandafter\\csname @eprint@\\@tempb\\endcsname\\expandafter{\\@tempc}}%\n }\n\n% \\mniiiauthor\n%\n% The following implements the three-author-hack described in mnras.bst.\n%\n% This consumes a command for each such author. It's surely possible\n% to avoid this (with some constructions involving {\\\\#1}; see\n% Appendix D cleverness), but that would verge on the unmaintanably\n% arcane, and not really be worth it.\n\\def\\mniiiauthor#1#2#3{%\n \\@ifundefined{mniiiauth@#1}\n {\\global\\expandafter\\let\\csname mniiiauth@#1\\endcsname\\null #2}\n {#3}}\n\n\n% ****************************************\n% * THE INDEX *\n% ****************************************\n%\n\\newif\\if@restonecol\n\\def\\theindex{\\section*{INDEX}\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{INDEX}\n \\reset@font\\footnotesize \\parindent\\z@ \\parskip\\z@ plus .1pt\\relax\n \\let\\item\\@idxitem}\n\\def\\@idxitem{\\par\\hangindent 1em}\n\\def\\subitem {\\par\\hangindent 1em \\hspace*{1em}}\n\\def\\subsubitem{\\par\\hangindent 1em\\hspace*{1em}}\n\\def\\endtheindex{\\if@restonecol\\onecolumn\\else\\clearpage\\fi}\n\\def\\indexspace{\\par\\vskip\\baselineskip \\relax}\n\n% ****************************************\n% * FOOTNOTES *\n% ****************************************\n%\n\\def\\footnoterule{\\kern-3\\p@ \\hrule width 12pc height \\z@ \\kern 3\\p@}\n\n\\renewcommand{\\thefootnote}{\\mbox{{$\\fnsymbol{footnote}$}}}\n\\renewcommand{\\thempfootnote}{\\mbox{{${\\alph{mpfootnote}}$}}}\n\n\\def\\@fnsymbol#1{\\ifcase#1\\or \\mbox{${^{\\star}}$}\\or\n \\dagger\\or \\ddagger\\or\n \\S \\or \\P \\or \\|\\or \\mbox{$^{\\star\\star}$}\\or \\dagger\\dagger\n \\or \\ddagger\\ddagger\\or \\S\\S\\or \\P\\P\\or \\|\\|\\else ***\n \\fi\\relax}\n\n\\providecommand\\@makefntext[1]{}\n\n\\renewcommand{\\@makefnmark}{$\\@thefnmark$}\n\\renewcommand\\@makefntext[1]{\\parindent 1em\\noindent\n ${\\@thefnmark}$\\hspace{4pt}#1}\n\n\\newcommand{\\fixfootnotes}{%\n\\renewcommand{\\@makefnmark}{$^{\\@thefnmark}$}%\n\\renewcommand\\@makefntext[1]{\\parindent 1em\\noindent%\n $^{\\@thefnmark}$\\hspace{4pt}##1}%\n\\renewcommand{\\thefootnote}{\\arabic{footnote}}%\n\\setcounter{footnote}{0}%\n}\n%****************************************\n% * FIGURES AND TABLES *\n% ****************************************\n%\n% Settings for how much of the page can be used for floats\n\\setcounter{topnumber}{4}\n\\def\\topfraction{0.9}\n\\setcounter{bottomnumber}{2}\n\\def\\bottomfraction{0.5}\n\\setcounter{dbltopnumber}{3} % two-column floats\n\\def\\dbltopfraction{0.9}\n\\setcounter{totalnumber}{4}\n\\def\\textfraction{0.1}\n\\def\\floatpagefraction{0.9}\n\\def\\dblfloatpagefraction{0.9}\n\n\\newif\\ifst@rredfloat\n\\newcounter{table}\n\\def\\thetable{\\@arabic\\c@table}\n\\def\\fps@table{tbp}\n\\def\\ftype@table{1}\n\\def\\fstyle@table{\\reset@font\\small\\rm}\n\\def\\ext@table{lot}\n\\def\\fnum@table{Table \\thetable}\n\\def\\table{\\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n \\let\\@makecaption=\\SFB@maketablecaption%\n \\@float{table}\\fstyle@table}\n\\let\\endtable\\end@float\n\\@namedef{table*}{\\def\\baselinestretch{1}\\st@rredfloattrue\n \\let\\@makecaption=\\SFB@maketablecaption%\n \\@dblfloat{table}\\centering\\fstyle@table}\n\\@namedef{endtable*}{\\end@dblfloat\\st@rredfloatfalse}\n\n\\newcounter{figure}\n\\def\\thefigure{\\@arabic\\c@figure}\n\\def\\fps@figure{tbp}\n\\def\\ftype@figure{2}\n\\def\\fstyle@figure{\\reset@font\\small\\rm}\n\\def\\ext@figure{lof}\n\\def\\fnum@figure{Figure \\thefigure}\n\\def\\figure{\\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n \\let\\@makecaption=\\SFB@makefigurecaption%\n \\@float{figure}\\fstyle@figure}\n\\let\\endfigure\\end@float\n\\@namedef{figure*}{\\def\\baselinestretch{1}\\st@rredfloattrue\n \\let\\@makecaption=\\SFB@makefigurecaption%\n \\@dblfloat{figure}\\centering\\fstyle@figure}\n\\@namedef{endfigure*}{\\end@dblfloat\\st@rredfloatfalse}\n\n\\long\\def\\SFB@makefigurecaption#1#2{\\vskip 6pt\n \\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{\\reset@font\\small{\\bf #1}%\n \\if@cont \\ -- {\\it continued}\\else{\\bf .}\\fi\\ {\\rm #2}\\par}%\n \\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize\n {\\reset@font\\small{\\bf #1}%\n \\if@cont \\ -- {\\it continued}\\else{\\bf .}\\fi\\ {\\rm #2}\\par}%\n \\else\n \\ifst@rredfloat\n \\hbox to\\hsize{\\hfill\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfill}%\n \\else\n \\hbox to\\hsize{\\hfill\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfill}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\vskip 6pt\n \\@contfalse\n}\n\n\\long\\def\\SFB@maketablecaption#1#2{\\vskip 6pt\n \\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{\\reset@font\\small{\\bf #1}%\n \\if@cont \\ -- {\\it continued}\\else{\\bf .}\\fi\\ {\\rm #2}\\par}%\n \\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize\n {\\reset@font\\small{\\bf #1}%\n \\if@cont \\ -- {\\it continued}\\else{\\bf .}\\fi\\ {\\rm #2}\\par}%\n \\else\n \\hbox to\\hsize{\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfill}%\n \\fi\n \\vskip 6pt\n \\@contfalse\n}\n\n\\newif\\if@cont\n\\def\\caption{\\refstepcounter\\@captype \\@dblarg{\\@caption\\@captype}}\n\\def\\contcaption{\\@conttrue\\SFB@caption\\@captype}\n\n\\long\\def\\SFB@caption#1#2{%\\par\n \\begingroup\n \\@parboxrestore\n \\reset@font\\normalsize\n \\@makecaption{\\csname fnum@#1\\endcsname}{\\ignorespaces #2}\\par\n \\endgroup}\n\n% ****************************************\n% * CUP specials *\n% ****************************************\n%\n% KTS: I'm not convinced that any of these are still used, but will avoid\n% deleting them just in case.\n%\n% The following code is taken from authordate.sty, by David Rhead, of\n% the Cripps Computing Centre (February 1990), with some modifications\n% by ggw. It is intended for documents\n% that use the author-date citation system. When used in conjunction with\n% authordate1.bst, ... , authordate4.bst, it allows citations of the\n% form \\shortcite{bloggs-60} as well as the usual \\cite{bloggs-60}.\n% When\n% ... \\cite{bloggs-60} ... \\shortcite{bloggs-60} ...\n% appears in the input file,\n% ... (Bloggs, 1960) ... (1960) ...\n% appears in the final document.\n%\n% Code taken from apalike.sty.\n%\n\\def\\@cite#1#2{(#1\\if@tempswa , #2\\fi)}\n\\def\\@biblabel#1{}\n\n% Set length of hanging indentation for bibliography entries\n%\n\n\\if@usenatbib\\relax\\else%\n\\newlength{\\bibhang}\n\\setlength{\\bibhang}{2em}\n\\fi\n\n% Define default title and page-head text.\n%\n\\def\\bibtitle{References}\n\\def\\bibheadtitle{REFERENCES}\n\n% Code taken from aaai.sty.\n%\n% don't box citations, add space between multiple citations, separate with ;\n\\def\\@citex[#1]#2{%\n \\if@filesw\\immediate\\write\\@auxout{\\string\\citation{#2}}\\fi\n \\def\\@citea{}\\@cite{\\@for\\@citeb:=#2\\do\n {\\@citea\\def\\@citea{; }\\@ifundefined\n {b@\\@citeb}{{\\reset@font\\bf ?}\\@warning\n {Citation `\\@citeb' on page \\thepage \\space undefined}}%\n{\\csname b@\\@citeb\\endcsname}}}{#1}}\n% Allow short (name-less) citations, when used in\n% conjunction with a bibliography style that creates labels like\n% \\citename{<names>, }<year>\n\\let\\@internalcite\\cite\n\\def\\cite{\\def\\citename##1{##1}\\@internalcite}\n\\def\\shortcite{\\def\\citename##1{}\\@internalcite}\n\n% Typesetting note at the end of the article\n\\def\\bsp{\\vspace{0.5cm}\\reset@font\\footnotesize\\noindent This paper\nhas been typeset from a \\TeX/\\LaTeX\\ file prepared by the author.}\n\n\n\n% ****************************************\n% * MISCELLANEOUS *\n% ****************************************\n%\n% DATE\n\\def\\today{\\number\\day\\ \\ifcase\\month\\or\n January\\or February\\or March\\or April\\or May\\or June\\or\n July\\or August\\or September\\or October\\or November\\or December\n \\fi \\ \\number\\year}\n\n% REVISED AUTHOR QUERY COMMAND\n% Queries in text are printed in large bold font, in square brackets\n% Queries in references are printed as bold number followed by text\n \\DeclareFixedFont{\\largerm}{OT1}{cmss}{m}{n}{17}\n \\DeclareFixedFont{\\largeital}{OT1}{cmss}{m}{sl}{17}\n \\newcommand{\\aquery}[1]{\\mbox{\\largerm {[#1]}}}\n \\newcommand{\\BSLquery}[1]{\\aquery{#1}}\n %For backwards compatibility with old query command\n \\newcommand{\\tquery}[1]{\\mbox{\\largeital{[#1]}}}\n %Typesetter query: same format\n \\newenvironment{query}{\\vspace{5mm} \\noindent {\\bf Queries}\\\\}{}\n \\newcommand{\\authorquery}[2]{\\noindent{{\\bf #1} #2}\\\\}\n\n% definition required for newarray.sty\n\\gdef\\d@llar{}\n\n% ****************************************\n% * INITIALIZATION *\n% ****************************************\n%\n%\n%%%NHT: this code needs fixed.\n%%% At the moment the zif is always undefined, so it does nothing!\n\\newif\\ifCUPmtlplainloaded\n\\ifx\\CUP@mtlplain@loaded\\undefined\n\\else\n \\global\\CUPmtlplainloadedtrue\n \\input mnsym\n\\fi\n%\n\\flushbottom\n\\ps@headings\n\\ifSFB@galley\n \\raggedbottom\n \\ps@empty\n\\fi\n%\\ifSFB@referee\n% \\raggedbottom\n%\\fi\n\\pagenumbering{arabic}\n\\if@twocolumn\n \\twocolumn\n \\sloppy\n\\else\n \\onecolumn\n\\fi\n\\frenchspacing\n\n\n% ****************************************\n% * Change log *\n% ****************************************\n\n\n% Original file produced by Cambridge University Press 1994\n% for LaTeX version 2.09, 1988, by Leslie Lamport\n% based on the original LaTeX ARTICLE DOCUMENT STYLE\n% modifications by Sue Brooks, Alison Woollatt and Mark Reed 1993, 1994\n% further modifications by Nadine and John Thompson 1999 August\n% and David Evans 1999 December. Updates by Keith T. Smith 2013.\n%\n% > Incorporating also parts of authordate.sty\n% by David Rhead, Cripps Computing Centre (Feb 1990).\n% > Incorporating special symbol code from laa.sty v1.1 (25th Feb 1991)\n% used with the permission of Springer Verlag.\n% > Incorporating parts of mssymb.tex (8th July 1987).\n% > Incorporating newfont.sty vALPHA pl 8 (16th August 1994), by M. Reed\n%\n% v0.1.01 SFB text area, abstract heading, secnumdepth,\n% \\dblfloatpagefraction\n% v0.1.02 SFB landscape, galley and referee options;\n% new catchline; enumerated lists; correct raggedright\n% on section headings;\n% v0.1.03 SFB continued floats with \\caption* (removed now),\n% short captions centred\n% v0.1.04 SFB appendices, unnumbered list (using description)\n% v0.1.05 AJW roman catchline, final statement\n% v1.0 RM BSP note, \\bsp, added to cup specials\n% v1.1 AJW / MR, 28th January 1994. NFSS 1/2 compatible,\n% Springer-Verlag macros added\n% v1.2 AJW, 18th July 1994. Improved cont. captions,\n% MR font selection check improved,\n% MR removed some redundant code, AW \\sevensize added,\n% MR Added MR's `NewFont' support, MR Improved NFSS 1/2 support,\n% MR Added support for Bold math and AMS symbols for NFSS 1,\n% MR par's in abstract now have par indents.\n% MR added \\ifCUPmtlplainloaded switch for use in documents.\n% MR Added mnsym.tex (for Times version).\n% v1.25 MR, not released to authors 16th August 1994.\n% Replaced existing Newfont.sty code with updated code, after\n% discovering several bugs. This version not released to authors\n% because they are unlikely to find the bugs unless:\n% 1) they have an extremely long article,\n% 2) have used many \\New.. commands (no docs were supplied for\n% these anyway).\n% v1.3 MR, 5 September 1994. Added printing of style file version to\n% 'Printed' info in catchline. Will help us identify how the\n% article was produced (TeX/LaTeX) and the version number of the\n% macros.\n% MR Tables and Figures no longer get double spaced when using the\n% `referee' or `doublespacing' options.\n% MR Corrected 7th footnote symbol: made a \\star\\star (was **).\n% MR Corrected problem where some headings were not upper-case\n% when they should have been (\\section*).\n% v1.4 AJW, 14th September 1995. Add footlines and \\newauthor,\n% correct \\listparindent in enumerate environment.\n% v2.1 NHT/JST 1999 August 22. Conversion to\n% a LaTeX2e class file, following the conversions used\n% in GJIb.sty->GJI.cls.\n% Obselete NFSS font information removed.\n% footnotes redefined.\n% v2.2 DE various changes.\n% NHT 1999 Dec 23. \\la and \\ga symbols fixed. Bug in displaying\n% author names and addresses fixed. Problem in producing footnotes\n% in minipages fixed.\n% v2.3b Keith T. Smith (Royal Astronomical Society)\n% September 2013\n% Beta testing only - never publicly released\n% First update in over a decade\n% Now requires the 'geometry' package to enforce A4 paper\n% Now requires the 'fixltx2e' package to fix float ordering\n% Now requires the 'hyperref' package for clickable links\n% Updated headers and footers, and typesetting of reference list\n% Removed the fleqn code in this file, which didn't do anything\n% Added definitions for journal abbreviations used by ADS\n% Define a \\ion command for ionization states\n% Added commands used by the new version \n% of the .bst file (code by Norman Gray)\n% Now licensed under LPPL, comments updated accordingly\n% Various minor tweaks and updates\n% v3.0 Keith T. Smith (Royal Astronomical Society)\n% May 2015\n% Package renamed from 'mn2e' to 'mnras' after\n% discussion with the TeX Users Group\n% Numerous small tweaks and improvements following testing\n% end of mnras.cls\n\n================================================\nFILE: references.bib\n================================================\n@article{legin2024posterior,\n title={Posterior sampling of the initial conditions of the universe from non-linear large scale structures using score-based generative models},\n author={Legin, Ronan and Ho, Matthew and Lemos, Pablo and Perreault-Levasseur, Laurence and Ho, Shirley and Hezaveh, Yashar and Wandelt, Benjamin},\n journal={Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters},\n volume={527},\n number={1},\n pages={L173--L178},\n year={2024},\n publisher={Oxford University Press}\n}\n\n@article{remy2023probabilistic,\n title={Probabilistic mass-mapping with neural score estimation},\n author={Remy, Benjamin and Lanusse, Francois and Jeffrey, Niall and Liu, Jia and Starck, J-L and Osato, Ken and Schrabback, Tim},\n journal={Astronomy \\& Astrophysics},\n volume={672},\n pages={A51},\n year={2023},\n publisher={EDP Sciences}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Mandelbaum2018,\n author = {{Mandelbaum}, Rachel},\n title = \"{Weak Lensing for Precision Cosmology}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = sep,\n volume = {56},\n pages = {393-433},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051928},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1710.03235},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ARA&A..56..393M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@misc{li2026basicsletdenoisinggenerative,\n title={Back to Basics: Let Denoising Generative Models Denoise}, \n author={Tianhong Li and Kaiming He},\n year={2026},\n eprint={2511.13720},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13720}, \n}\n\n@misc{ronneberger2015unetconvolutionalnetworksbiomedical,\n title={U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation}, \n author={Olaf Ronneberger and Philipp Fischer and Thomas Brox},\n year={2015},\n eprint={1505.04597},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04597}, \n}\n\n@misc{dosovitskiy2021imageworth16x16words,\n title={An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale}, \n author={Alexey Dosovitskiy and Lucas Beyer and Alexander Kolesnikov and Dirk Weissenborn and Xiaohua Zhai and Thomas Unterthiner and Mostafa Dehghani and Matthias Minderer and Georg Heigold and Sylvain Gelly and Jakob Uszkoreit and Neil Houlsby},\n year={2021},\n eprint={2010.11929},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11929}, \n}\n\n@article{Zeghal_2025,\n title={Simulation-based inference benchmark for weak lensing cosmology},\n volume={699},\n ISSN={1432-0746},\n url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452410},\n DOI={10.1051/0004-6361/202452410},\n journal={Astronomy \\& Astrophysics},\n publisher={EDP Sciences},\n author={Zeghal, Justine and Lanzieri, Denise and Lanusse, François and Boucaud, Alexandre and Louppe, Gilles and Aubourg, Eric and Bayer, Adrian E.},\n year={2025},\n month=jul, pages={A327} }\n\n@article{Lanzieri_2025,\n title={Optimal neural summarization for full-field weak lensing cosmological implicit inference},\n volume={697},\n ISSN={1432-0746},\n url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451535},\n DOI={10.1051/0004-6361/202451535},\n journal={Astronomy \\& Astrophysics},\n publisher={EDP Sciences},\n author={Lanzieri, Denise and Zeghal, Justine and Lucas Makinen, T. and Boucaud, Alexandre and Starck, Jean-Luc and Lanusse, François},\n year={2025},\n month=may, pages={A162} }\n\n@article{clerkin,\n author = {Clerkin, L. and Kirk, D. and Manera, M. and Lahav, O. and Abdalla, F. and Amara, A. and Bacon, D. and Chang, C. and Gaztañaga, E. and Hawken, A. and Jain, B. and Joachimi, B. and Vikram, V. and Abbott, T. and Allam, S. and Armstrong, R. and Benoit-Lévy, A. and Bernstein, G. M. and Bernstein, R. A. and Bertin, E. and Brooks, D. and Burke, D. L. and Rosell, A. Carnero and Carrasco Kind, M. and Crocce, M. and Cunha, C. E. and D'Andrea, C. B. and da Costa, L. N. and Desai, S. and Diehl, H. T. and Dietrich, J. P. and Eifler, T. F. and Evrard, A. E. and Flaugher, B. and Fosalba, P. and Frieman, J. and Gerdes, D. W. and Gruen, D. and Gruendl, R. A. and Gutierrez, G. and Honscheid, K. and James, D. J. and Kent, S. and Kuehn, K. and Kuropatkin, N. and Lima, M. and Melchior, P. and Miquel, R. and Nord, B. and Plazas, A. A. and Romer, A. K. and Roodman, A. and Sanchez, E. and Schubnell, M. and Sevilla-Noarbe, I. and Smith, R. C. and Soares-Santos, M. and Sobreira, F. and Suchyta, E. and Swanson, M. E. C. and Tarle, G. and Walker, A. R.},\n title = {Testing the lognormality of the galaxy and weak lensing convergence distributions from Dark Energy Survey maps},\n journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},\n volume = {466},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1444-1461},\n year = {2016},\n month = {08},\n abstract = {It is well known that the probability distribution function (PDF) of galaxy density contrast is approximately lognormal; whether the PDF of mass fluctuations derived from weak lensing convergence (κWL) is lognormal is less well established. We derive PDFs of the galaxy and projected matter density distributions via the counts-in-cells (CiC) method. We use maps of galaxies and weak lensing convergence produced from the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data over 139 deg2. We test whether the underlying density contrast is well described by a lognormal distribution for the galaxies, the convergence and their joint PDF. We confirm that the galaxy density contrast distribution is well modelled by a lognormal PDF convolved with Poisson noise at angular scales from 10 to 40 arcmin (corresponding to physical scales of 3–10 Mpc). We note that as κWL is a weighted sum of the mass fluctuations along the line of sight, its PDF is expected to be only approximately lognormal. We find that the κWL distribution is well modelled by a lognormal PDF convolved with Gaussian shape noise at scales between 10 and 20 arcmin, with a best-fitting χ2/dof of 1.11 compared to 1.84 for a Gaussian model, corresponding to p-values 0.35 and 0.07, respectively, at a scale of 10 arcmin. Above 20 arcmin a simple Gaussian model is sufficient. The joint PDF is also reasonably fitted by a bivariate lognormal. As a consistency check, we compare the variances derived from the lognormal modelling with those directly measured via CiC. Our methods are validated against maps from the MICE Grand Challenge N-body simulation.},\n issn = {0035-8711},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw2106},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2106},\n eprint = {https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/466/2/1444/10866855/stw2106.pdf},\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Xavier_2016,\n title={Improving lognormal models for cosmological fields},\n volume={459},\n ISSN={1365-2966},\n url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw874},\n DOI={10.1093/mnras/stw874},\n number={4},\n journal={Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},\n publisher={Oxford University Press (OUP)},\n author={Xavier, Henrique S. and Abdalla, Filipe B. and Joachimi, Benjamin},\n year={2016},\n month=apr, pages={3693–3710} }\n\n@misc{vaswani2023attentionneed,\n title={Attention Is All You Need}, \n author={Ashish Vaswani and Noam Shazeer and Niki Parmar and Jakob Uszkoreit and Llion Jones and Aidan N. Gomez and Lukasz Kaiser and Illia Polosukhin},\n year={2023},\n eprint={1706.03762},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CL},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762}, \n}\n\n@misc{radford2021learningtransferablevisualmodels,\n title={Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision}, \n author={Alec Radford and Jong Wook Kim and Chris Hallacy and Aditya Ramesh and Gabriel Goh and Sandhini Agarwal and Girish Sastry and Amanda Askell and Pamela Mishkin and Jack Clark and Gretchen Krueger and Ilya Sutskever},\n year={2021},\n eprint={2103.00020},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00020}, \n}\n\n@misc{parker2025aion1omnimodalfoundationmodel,\n title={AION-1: Omnimodal Foundation Model for Astronomical Sciences}, \n author={Liam Parker and Francois Lanusse and Jeff Shen and Ollie Liu and Tom Hehir and Leopoldo Sarra and Lucas Meyer and Micah Bowles and Sebastian Wagner-Carena and Helen Qu and Siavash Golkar and Alberto Bietti and Hatim Bourfoune and Nathan Casserau and Pierre Cornette and Keiya Hirashima and Geraud Krawezik and Ruben Ohana and Nicholas Lourie and Michael McCabe and Rudy Morel and Payel Mukhopadhyay and Mariel Pettee and Bruno Regaldo-Saint Blancard and Kyunghyun Cho and Miles Cranmer and Shirley Ho},\n year={2025},\n eprint={2510.17960},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={astro-ph.IM},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17960}, \n}\n\n@article{coles1991lognormal,\n title={A lognormal model for the cosmological mass distribution},\n author={Coles, Peter and Jones, Bernard},\n journal={Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},\n volume={248},\n number={1},\n pages={1--13},\n year={1991},\n publisher={The Royal Astronomical Society}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{cuesta2024joint,\n title={Joint cosmological parameter inference and initial condition reconstruction with Stochastic Interpolants},\n author={Cuesta-Lazaro, Carolina and Bayer, Adrian E and Albergo, Michael S and Mishra-Sharma, Siddharth and Modi, Chirag and Eisenstein, Daniel J},\n booktitle={NeurIPS 2024 Workshop: Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{peebles2023scalable,\n title={Scalable diffusion models with transformers},\n author={Peebles, William and Xie, Saining},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision},\n pages={4195--4205},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{albergo2023stochastic,\n title={Stochastic interpolants: A unifying framework for flows and diffusions},\n author={Albergo, Michael S and Boffi, Nicholas M and Vanden-Eijnden, Eric},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08797},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{friedrich2020primordial,\n title={Primordial non-Gaussianity without tails--how to measure f NL with the bulk of the density PDF},\n author={Friedrich, Oliver and Uhlemann, Cora and Villaescusa-Navarro, Francisco and Baldauf, Tobias and Manera, Marc and Nishimichi, Takahiro},\n journal={Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},\n volume={498},\n number={1},\n pages={464--483},\n year={2020},\n publisher={Oxford University Press}\n}\n\n@article{Jeffrey_2020,\n title={Likelihood-free inference with neural compression of DES SV weak lensing map statistics},\n volume={501},\n ISSN={1365-2966},\n url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3594},\n DOI={10.1093/mnras/staa3594},\n number={1},\n journal={Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},\n publisher={Oxford University Press (OUP)},\n author={Jeffrey, Niall and Alsing, Justin and Lanusse, François},\n year={2020},\n month=nov, pages={954–969} }\n\n@software{jax2018github,\n author = {James Bradbury and Roy Frostig and Peter Hawkins and Matthew James Johnson and Chris Leary and Dougal Maclaurin and George Necula and Adam Paszke and Jake Vander{P}las and Skye Wanderman-{M}ilne and Qiao Zhang},\n title = {{JAX}: composable transformations of {P}ython+{N}um{P}y programs},\n url = {http://github.com/jax-ml/jax},\n version = {0.3.13},\n year = {2018},\n}\n\n@software{flax2020github,\n author = {Jonathan Heek and Anselm Levskaya and Avital Oliver and Marvin Ritter and Bertrand Rondepierre and Andreas Steiner and Marc van {Z}ee},\n title = {{F}lax: A neural network library and ecosystem for {JAX}},\n url = {http://github.com/google/flax},\n version = {0.12.3},\n year = {2024},\n}\n\n@misc{betancourt2018conceptualintroductionhamiltonianmonte,\n title={A Conceptual Introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo}, \n author={Michael Betancourt},\n year={2018},\n eprint={1701.02434},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={stat.ME},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.02434}, \n}\n\n@misc{hoffman2011nouturnsampleradaptivelysetting,\n title={The No-U-Turn Sampler: Adaptively Setting Path Lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo}, \n author={Matthew D. Hoffman and Andrew Gelman},\n year={2011},\n eprint={1111.4246},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={stat.CO},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.4246}, \n}\n\n@book{Brooks_2011,\n title={Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo},\n ISBN={9780429138508},\n url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b10905},\n DOI={10.1201/b10905},\n publisher={Chapman and Hall/CRC},\n author={Brooks, Steve and Gelman, Andrew and Jones, Galin and Meng, Xiao-Li},\n year={2011},\n month=may }\n\n@misc{porqueres2023fieldlevelinferencecosmicshear,\n title={Field-level inference of cosmic shear with intrinsic alignments and baryons}, \n author={Natalia Porqueres and Alan Heavens and Daniel Mortlock and Guilhem Lavaux and T. Lucas Makinen},\n year={2023},\n eprint={2304.04785},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={astro-ph.CO},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.04785}, \n}\n\n@misc{lavaux2019systematicfreeinferencecosmicmatter,\n title={Systematic-free inference of the cosmic matter density field from SDSS3-BOSS data}, \n author={Guilhem Lavaux and Jens Jasche and Florent Leclercq},\n year={2019},\n eprint={1909.06396},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={astro-ph.CO},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.06396}, \n}\n\n@article{jasche2013bayesian,\n title={Bayesian physical reconstruction of initial conditions from large-scale structure surveys},\n author={Jasche, Jens and Wandelt, Benjamin D},\n journal={Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},\n volume={432},\n number={2},\n pages={894--913},\n year={2013},\n publisher={The Royal Astronomical Society}\n}\n\n@misc{song2021scorebasedgenerativemodelingstochastic,\n title={Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations}, \n author={Yang Song and Jascha Sohl-Dickstein and Diederik P. Kingma and Abhishek Kumar and Stefano Ermon and Ben Poole},\n year={2021},\n eprint={2011.13456},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.LG},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.13456}, \n}\n\n@misc{ho2020denoisingdiffusionprobabilisticmodels,\n title={Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models}, \n author={Jonathan Ho and Ajay Jain and Pieter Abbeel},\n year={2020},\n eprint={2006.11239},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.LG},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11239}, \n}\n\n@article{Doeser_2025,\n title={Learning the Universe: learning to optimize cosmic initial conditions with non-differentiable structure formation models},\n volume={542},\n ISSN={1365-2966},\n url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf1289},\n DOI={10.1093/mnras/staf1289},\n number={2},\n journal={Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},\n publisher={Oxford University Press (OUP)},\n author={Doeser, Ludvig and Ata, Metin and Jasche, Jens},\n year={2025},\n month=aug, pages={1403–1422} }\n\n@article{aghamousa2016desi,\n title={The DESI experiment part I: Science, targeting, and survey design},\n author={Aghamousa, Amir and Aguilar, Jessica and Ahlen, Steve and Alam, Shadab and Allen, Lori E and Prieto, Carlos Allende and Annis, James and Bailey, Stephen and Balland, Christophe and Ballester, Otger and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.00036},\n year={2016}\n}\n\n@article{laureijs2011euclid,\n title={Euclid definition study report},\n author={Laureijs, Rene and Amiaux, J{\\'e}r{\\^o}me and Arduini, S and Augueres, J-L and Brinchmann, J and Cole, R and Cropper, M and Dabin, C and Duvet, L and Ealet, AJAPA and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1110.3193},\n year={2011}\n}\n@article{ivezic2019lsst,\n title={LSST: from science drivers to reference design and anticipated data products},\n author={Ivezi{\\'c}, {\\v{Z}}eljko and Kahn, Steven M and Tyson, J Anthony and Abel, Bob and Acosta, Emily and Allsman, Robyn and Alonso, David and AlSayyad, Yusra and Anderson, Scott F and Andrew, John and others},\n journal={The Astrophysical Journal},\n volume={873},\n number={2},\n pages={111},\n year={2019},\n publisher={The American Astronomical Society}\n}\n\n@article{porqueres2023field,\n title={Field-level inference of cosmic shear with intrinsic alignments and baryons},\n author={Porqueres, Natalia and Heavens, Alan and Mortlock, Daniel and Lavaux, Guilhem and Makinen, T Lucas},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.04785},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{chen2024probing,\n title={Probing primordial non-Gaussianity by reconstructing the initial conditions},\n author={Chen, Xinyi and Padmanabhan, Nikhil and Eisenstein, Daniel J},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00968},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{andrews2023bayesian,\n title={Bayesian field-level inference of primordial non-Gaussianity using next-generation galaxy surveys},\n author={Andrews, Adam and Jasche, Jens and Lavaux, Guilhem and Schmidt, Fabian},\n journal={Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},\n volume={520},\n number={4},\n pages={5746--5763},\n year={2023},\n publisher={Oxford University Press}\n}\n\n@article{bayer2026field,\n title={Field-Level Inference from Galaxies: BAO Reconstruction},\n author={Bayer, Adrian E and Parker, Liam and Valcin, David and Chen, Shi-Fan and Modi, Chirag and Seljak, Uros},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.15732},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{chung2022diffusion,\n title={Diffusion posterior sampling for general noisy inverse problems},\n author={Chung, Hyungjin and Kim, Jeongsol and Mccann, Michael T and Klasky, Marc L and Ye, Jong Chul},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14687},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{smail1995deep,\n title={Deep optical galaxy counts with the Keck Telescope},\n author={Smail, Ian and Hogg, David W and Yan, Lin and Cohen, Judith G},\n journal={The Astrophysical Journal Letters},\n volume={449},\n number={2},\n pages={L105--L108},\n year={1995}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{lemos2023sampling,\n title={Sampling-based accuracy testing of posterior estimators for general inference},\n author={Lemos, Pablo and Coogan, Adam and Hezaveh, Yashar and Perreault-Levasseur, Laurence},\n booktitle={International Conference on Machine Learning},\n pages={19256--19273},\n year={2023},\n organization={PMLR}\n}\n\n@article{wang2022high,\n title={The high latitude spectroscopic survey on the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope},\n author={Wang, Yun and Zhai, Zhongxu and Alavi, Anahita and Massara, Elena and Pisani, Alice and Benson, Andrew and Hirata, Christopher M and Samushia, Lado and Weinberg, David H and Colbert, James and others},\n journal={The Astrophysical Journal},\n volume={928},\n number={1},\n pages={1},\n year={2022},\n publisher={The American Astronomical Society}\n}\n\n@article{spergel2015wide,\n title={Wide-field infrarred survey telescope-astrophysics focused telescope assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 report},\n author={Spergel, Davidetal and Gehrels, Neil and Baltay, Charles and Bennett, David and Breckinridge, James and Donahue, Megan and Dressler, Alan and Gaudi, B Scott and Greene, Tom and Guyon, Olivier and others},\n journal={ArXiv e-prints},\n pages={arXiv--1503},\n year={2015}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{rombach2022high,\n title={High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models},\n author={Rombach, Robin and Blattmann, Andreas and Lorenz, Dominik and Esser, Patrick and Ommer, Bj{\\\"o}rn},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition},\n pages={10684--10695},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{jeffrey2025dark,\n title={Dark energy survey year 3 results: likelihood-free, simulation-based w cdm inference with neural compression of weak-lensing map statistics},\n author={Jeffrey, Niall and Whiteway, Lorne and Gatti, Marco and Williamson, J and Alsing, Justin and Porredon, Anna and Prat, Judit and Doux, Cyrille and Jain, Bhuvnesh and Chang, Chihway and others},\n journal={Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},\n volume={536},\n number={2},\n pages={1303--1322},\n year={2025},\n publisher={Oxford University Press}\n}\n\n@article{kacprzak2023cosmogridv1,\n title={CosmoGridV1: a simulated ��CDM theory prediction for map-level cosmological inference},\n author={Kacprzak, Tomasz and Fluri, Janis and Schneider, Aurel and Refregier, Alexandre and Stadel, Joachim},\n journal={Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics},\n volume={2023},\n number={02},\n pages={050},\n year={2023},\n publisher={IOP Publishing}\n}\n\n@article{xavier2016flask,\n title={FLASK: Full-sky Lognormal Astro-fields Simulation Kit},\n author={Xavier, Henrique S and Abdalla, Filipe B and Joachimi, Benjamin},\n journal={Astrophysics Source Code Library},\n pages={ascl--1606},\n year={2016}\n}\n\n@article{tessore2023glass,\n title={Glass: Generator for large scale structure},\n author={Tessore, Nicolas and Loureiro, Arthur and Joachimi, Benjamin and von Wietersheim-Kramsta, Maximilian and Jeffrey, Niall},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01942},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{thomsen2025dark,\n title={Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Simulation-based $ w $ CDM inference from weak lensing and galaxy clustering maps with deep learning. I. Analysis design},\n author={Thomsen, A and Bucko, J and Kacprzak, T and Ajani, V and Fluri, J and Refregier, A and Anbajagane, D and Castander, FJ and Fert{\\'e}, A and Gatti, M and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.04681},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@misc{lipman2023flowmatchinggenerativemodeling,\n title={Flow Matching for Generative Modeling}, \n author={Yaron Lipman and Ricky T. Q. Chen and Heli Ben-Hamu and Maximilian Nickel and Matt Le},\n year={2023},\n eprint={2210.02747},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.LG},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02747}, \n}\n\n@article{ajani2020constraining,\n title={Constraining neutrino masses with weak-lensing multiscale peak counts},\n author={Ajani, Virginia and Peel, Austin and Pettorino, Valeria and Starck, Jean-Luc and Li, Zack and Liu, Jia},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.10993},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@article{cheng2020new,\n title={A new approach to observational cosmology using the scattering transform},\n author={Cheng, Sihao and Ting, Yuan-Sen and M{\\'e}nard, Brice and Bruna, Joan},\n journal={Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},\n volume={499},\n number={4},\n pages={5902--5914},\n year={2020},\n publisher={Oxford University Press}\n}\n\n@article{liu2019constraining,\n title={Constraining neutrino mass with the tomographic weak lensing one-point probability distribution function and power spectrum},\n author={Liu, Jia and Madhavacheril, Mathew S},\n journal={Physical Review D},\n volume={99},\n number={8},\n pages={083508},\n year={2019},\n publisher={APS}\n}\n\n@article{kratochvil2012probing,\n title={Probing cosmology with weak lensing Minkowski functionals},\n author={Kratochvil, Jan M and Lim, Eugene A and Wang, Sheng and Haiman, Zolt{\\'a}n and May, Morgan and Huffenberger, Kevin},\n journal={Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology},\n volume={85},\n number={10},\n pages={103513},\n year={2012},\n publisher={APS}\n}\n\n@article{takada2004cosmological,\n title={Cosmological parameters from lensing power spectrum and bispectrum tomography},\n author={Takada, Masahiro and Jain, Bhuvnesh},\n journal={Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},\n volume={348},\n number={3},\n pages={897--915},\n year={2004},\n publisher={Blackwell Science Ltd Oxford, UK}\n}\n\n@article{zeghal2022neural,\n title={Neural posterior estimation with differentiable simulators},\n author={Zeghal, Justine and Lanusse, Fran{\\c{c}}ois and Boucaud, Alexandre and Remy, Benjamin and Aubourg, Eric},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.05636},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{Kaiser1993,\n title = {{Mapping the dark matter with weak gravitational lensing}},\n year = {1993},\n journal = {The Astrophysical Journal},\n author = {Kaiser, Nick and Squires, Gordon},\n month = {2},\n pages = {441},\n volume = {404},\n url = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/doi/10.1086/172297},\n doi = {10.1086/172297},\n issn = {0004-637X}\n}\n\n\n@article{Kilbinger2015,\n title = {{Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: A review}},\n year = {2015},\n journal = {Reports on Progress in Physics},\n author = {Kilbinger, Martin},\n number = {8},\n volume = {78},\n doi = {10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901},\n issn = {00344885},\n pmid = {26181770},\n arxivId = {1411.0115},\n keywords = {cosmology, large-scale structure of universe, weak gravitational lensing}\n}\n\n\n@article{jeffrey2021likelihood,\n title={Likelihood-free inference with neural compression of DES SV weak lensing map statistics},\n author={Jeffrey, Niall and Alsing, Justin and Lanusse, Fran{\\c{c}}ois},\n journal={Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},\n volume={501},\n number={1},\n pages={954--969},\n year={2021},\n publisher={Oxford University Press}\n}\n\n@article{loshchilov2017decoupled,\n title={Decoupled weight decay regularization},\n author={Loshchilov, Ilya and Hutter, Frank},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101},\n year={2017}\n}\n\n@article{kingma2014adam,\n title={Adam: A method for stochastic optimization},\n author={Kingma, Diederik P and Ba, Jimmy},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980},\n year={2014}\n}\n\n@article{li2024autoregressive,\n title={Autoregressive image generation without vector quantization},\n author={Li, Tianhong and Tian, Yonglong and Li, He and Deng, Mingyang and He, Kaiming},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={37},\n pages={56424--56445},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{zhang2019root,\n title={Root mean square layer normalization},\n author={Zhang, Biao and Sennrich, Rico},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={32},\n year={2019}\n}\n\n@article{shazeer2020glu,\n title={Glu variants improve transformer},\n author={Shazeer, Noam},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.05202},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@article{su2024roformer,\n title={Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding},\n author={Su, Jianlin and Ahmed, Murtadha and Lu, Yu and Pan, Shengfeng and Bo, Wen and Liu, Yunfeng},\n journal={Neurocomputing},\n volume={568},\n pages={127063},\n year={2024},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{henry2020query,\n title={Query-key normalization for transformers},\n author={Henry, Alex and Dachapally, Prudhvi Raj and Pawar, Shubham Shantaram and Chen, Yuxuan},\n booktitle={Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020},\n pages={4246--4253},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{glorot2010understanding,\n title={Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks},\n author={Glorot, Xavier and Bengio, Yoshua},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics},\n pages={249--256},\n year={2010},\n organization={JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{esser2024scaling,\n title={Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis},\n author={Esser, Patrick and Kulal, Sumith and Blattmann, Andreas and Entezari, Rahim and M{\\\"u}ller, Jonas and Saini, Harry and Levi, Yam and Lorenz, Dominik and Sauer, Axel and Boesel, Frederic and others},\n booktitle={Forty-first international conference on machine learning},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{karras2022elucidating,\n title={Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models},\n author={Karras, Tero and Aittala, Miika and Aila, Timo and Laine, Samuli},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={35},\n pages={26565--26577},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{adam2022posterior,\n title={Posterior samples of source galaxies in strong gravitational lenses with score-based priors},\n author={Adam, Alexandre and Coogan, Adam and Malkin, Nikolay and Legin, Ronan and Perreault-Levasseur, Laurence and Hezaveh, Yashar and Bengio, Yoshua},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.03812},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{harris2020array,\n title={Array programming with NumPy},\n author={Harris, Charles R and Millman, K Jarrod and Van Der Walt, St{\\'e}fan J and Gommers, Ralf and Virtanen, Pauli and Cournapeau, David and Wieser, Eric and Taylor, Julian and Berg, Sebastian and Smith, Nathaniel J and others},\n journal={nature},\n volume={585},\n number={7825},\n pages={357--362},\n year={2020},\n publisher={Nature Publishing Group UK London}\n}\n\n@misc{sharief2026mirascoreconditionaldistribution,\n title={MIRA: A Score for Conditional Distribution Accuracy and Model Comparison}, \n author={Sammy Sharief and Justine Zeghal and Gabriel Missael Barco and Pablo Lemos and Yashar Hezaveh and Laurence Perreault-Levasseur},\n year={2026},\n eprint={2605.02014},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={stat.ML},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02014}, \n}\n\n@article{gloeckler2024all,\n title={All-in-one simulation-based inference},\n author={Gloeckler, Manuel and Deistler, Michael and Weilbach, Christian and Wood, Frank and Macke, Jakob H},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.09636},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n\n@article{abbott2026dark,\n title={Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic Shear},\n author={Abbott, TMC and Aguena, M and Alarcon, A and Alves, O and Amon, A and Anbajagane, D and Andrade-Oliveira, F and d'Assignies, W and Avila, S and Bacon, D and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.10065},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n@article{wright2025kids,\n title={KiDS-Legacy: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear with the complete Kilo-Degree Survey},\n author={Wright, Angus H and St{\\\"o}lzner, Benjamin and Asgari, Marika and Bilicki, Maciej and Giblin, Benjamin and Heymans, Catherine and Hildebrandt, Hendrik and Hoekstra, Henk and Joachimi, Benjamin and Kuijken, Konrad and others},\n journal={Astronomy \\& Astrophysics},\n volume={703},\n pages={A158},\n year={2025},\n publisher={EDP Sciences}\n}\n\n@article{anbajagane2025dark,\n title={The Dark Energy Camera All Data Everywhere cosmic shear project V: Constraints on cosmology and astrophysics from 270 million galaxies across 13,000 deg $\\^{} 2$ of the sky},\n author={Anbajagane, D and Chang, C and Drlica-Wagner, A and Tan, CY and Adamow, M and Gruendl, RA and Secco, LF and Zhang, Z and Becker, MR and Ferguson, PS and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.03582},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{li2023hyper,\n title={Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear two-point correlation functions},\n author={Li, Xiangchong and Zhang, Tianqing and Sugiyama, Sunao and Dalal, Roohi and Terasawa, Ryo and Rau, Markus M and Mandelbaum, Rachel and Takada, Masahiro and More, Surhud and Strauss, Michael A and others},\n journal={Physical Review D},\n volume={108},\n number={12},\n pages={123518},\n year={2023},\n publisher={APS}\n}\n\n@misc{omori2026practicalfieldlevelinferenceweak,\n title={Towards Practical Field-Level Inference for Weak Lensing}, \n author={Yuuki Omori and Justine Zeghal and Chihway Chang and François Lanusse and Laurence Perreault-Levasseur},\n year={2026},\n eprint={2606.12255},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={astro-ph.CO},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12255}, \n}\n\n@Article{Hunter:2007,\n Author = {Hunter, J. D.},\n Title = {Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment},\n Journal = {Computing in Science \\& Engineering},\n Volume = {9},\n Number = {3},\n Pages = {90--95},\n abstract = {Matplotlib is a 2D graphics package used for Python for\n application development, interactive scripting, and publication-quality\n image generation across user interfaces and operating systems.},\n publisher = {IEEE COMPUTER SOC},\n doi = {10.1109/MCSE.2007.55},\n year = 2007\n}\n\n@article{Petri_2016,\n title={Mocking the weak lensing universe: The LensTools Python computing package},\n volume={17},\n ISSN={2213-1337},\n url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2016.06.001},\n DOI={10.1016/j.ascom.2016.06.001},\n journal={Astronomy and Computing},\n publisher={Elsevier BV},\n author={Petri, A.},\n year={2016},\n month=Oct, pages={73–79} }\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091189,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31989"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31989"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Moupriya Das"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Vipul Rai and Moupriya Das"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Exploring the entropic asymmetry on logical stochastic resonance with energetically equivalent intrinsic outputs"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"12 pages, 9 figures"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cond-mat.stat-mech"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Small-scale systems are inherently subject to environmental noise that can be harnessed constructively to realize reliable logic operations -- a phenomenon known as logical stochastic resonance (LSR), where a bistable system produces correct logical outputs within an optimal window of noise intensity. The Brownian dynamics governed by appropriate inputs inside a double-well potential, modeling the bistable system, mimic the logic operations. The two wells of this potential represent two distinct logical output states 0 and 1. Asymmetry in this potential is known to be essential for improving logical reliability. However, prior studies have focused on energetic asymmetry, characterized by unequal depths of the two wells of the potential. This left the role of the width asymmetry in the potential, unexplored. This latter class of asymmetry emerges due to the dissimilar widths of the two wells of the potential. It can be classified as the entropic asymmetry between the two logical output states. Here, we systematically investigate the effect of width or the entropic asymmetry in the system on the logical response for OR and AND gate operations. Unlike energetic asymmetry, width asymmetry preserves the energetic equivalence of the two intrinsic logical output states, making it a geometric effect. We find that increasing width asymmetry consistently improves the optimal P(logic), the quantifier measuring the successful logical outcome. Moreover, when it is combined with an energetic bias, it produces reliable logic gate operation at a significantly reduced energetic cost compared to the symmetric case. The requirement of this energy bias also diminishes gradually with the increasing degree of width asymmetry in the potential."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:26:45 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:26:45 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Rai","Vipul",""],["Das","Moupriya",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Rai\",\n \"Vipul\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Das\",\n \"Moupriya\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: manuscript.tex\n================================================\n%\\documentclass[10pts,aps,prx,twocolumn,showpacs,notitlepage,floatfix,superscriptaddress]{revtex4-2}\n\\documentclass[10pt,aps,prx,twocolumn,showpacs,notitlepage,floatfix,superscriptaddress,longbibliography]{revtex4-2}\n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\hypersetup{\ncolorlinks=false,\ncolorlinks=true,\ncitecolor=blue,\nlinkcolor=blue,\nurlcolor=blue}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{physics}\n\\usepackage{amsfonts}\n\\usepackage{amssymb}\n\\usepackage{mathtools}\n%\\usepackage{float}\n%\\usepackage{subcaption}\n\\usepackage{bm}\n\\usepackage{siunitx}\n\\usepackage{xfrac}\n\\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}\n\\usepackage{orcidlink} \n% Additional packages\n\\usepackage{braket}% Dirac braket\n\\usepackage{cases}% Numbered cases\n\n\\newcommand{\\mdas}[1]{\\textcolor{black}{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\pcmd}[1]{\\textcolor{black}{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\md}[1]{\\textcolor{orange}{#1}}\n\\renewcommand{\\thesubsubsection}{B~\\Roman{subsubsection}}\n\\DeclareUnicodeCharacter{0229}{\\c{e}}\n\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\n\\title{Exploring the entropic asymmetry on logical stochastic resonance with energetically equivalent intrinsic outputs}\n\\author{Vipul Rai\\orcidlink{0009-0000-0813-4482}}\n\\email{Contact author: d23176@students.iitmandi.ac.in}\n\\affiliation{School of Physical Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Mandi-175005 (H.P.), India}\n\\author{Moupriya Das\\orcidlink{0000-0003-1851-2162}}\n\\email{Contact author: moupriya@iitmandi.ac.in}\n\\affiliation{School of Chemical Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Mandi-175005 (H.P.), India}\n\n\n\\begin{abstract}\n%\\md{Points to include in the \\textbf{Abstract}: Will work on it finally}\\\\\n%\\mdas{\n%\\begin{itemize}\n%\\item Noise is inherent in small systems performing a logic response. \n%\\item Logical response is optimal at an intermediate noise level: \\textbf{Logical stochastic resonance}\n%\\item \\textbf{Asymmetry} in the potential is required to bring about a \\textbf{reliable and improved} logical response.\n%\\item The \\textbf{energetic asymmetry} case has been studied before.\n%\\item \\textbf{Width asymmetry }is introduced in the present study. Here,\\\\\n%1. \\textbf{The logical states are energetically equivalent}.\\\\\n%2. \\textbf{Systematic study} to observe the effect of the \\textbf{degree of width asymmetry} on the \\textbf{logical response}\n%3. Energetic bias improves the logical response further\\\\\n%4. Less energetic bias is required for the improvement of %the outcomes with width asymmetry\\\\\n%\\end{itemize}\n%}\n\nSmall-scale systems \\mdas{are inherently subject to environmental noise that} can be harnessed \nconstructively to realize reliable logic operations --- a phenomenon known \nas logical stochastic resonance (LSR), where a bistable system produces \ncorrect logical outputs within an optimal window of noise intensity. \nThe Brownian dynamics governed by appropriate inputs inside a double-well potential, modeling the bistable system, mimic the logic operations. The two wells of this potential represent two distinct logical output states $0$ and $1$.\nAsymmetry in this potential is known to be essential for improving \nlogical reliability. However, prior studies have focused on energetic \nasymmetry, characterized by unequal depths of the two wells of the potential.\nThis left the role of the width asymmetry in the potential, unexplored. This latter class of asymmetry emerges due to the dissimilar widths of the two wells of the potential. It can be classified as the entropic asymmetry between the two logical output states. Here, we systematically \ninvestigate the effect of width or the entropic asymmetry in the system on the logical response for OR \nand AND gate operations. Unlike energetic asymmetry, width asymmetry \npreserves the energetic equivalence of the two intrinsic logical output states, making it a geometric effect. We find that increasing width asymmetry \nconsistently improves the optimal $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$, the quantifier measuring the successful logical outcome.\nMoreover, when it is combined with an \nenergetic bias, it produces reliable logic gate operation at a significantly \nreduced energetic cost compared to the symmetric case. \nThe requirement of this energy bias also diminishes gradually with the increasing degree of width asymmetry in the potential.\\\\ \n%\\mdas{Therefore, our study reveals the possibility of employing entropic asymmetry that is naturally present in some systems, or implemented appropriately in the designed potentials, to generate basic types of logic gates under appropriate conditions.}\\\\\n\n%\\pcmd{\\textbf{General point to look at:} \\textit{To look for how the width asymmetry in the potential can be explained in real devices performing logic operations.} This will help explain the applicability and impact of the current work in practical circumstances. If proper information is found, the discussions can be included in the Abstract, Introduction and Conclusion to strengthen the motivation.}\\\\\n\n%\\mdas{Width asymmetry in the underlying potential of real systems:}\\\\\n\n%\\mdas{1. Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS)/ Nanoelectromechanical systems (NEMS): Unequal electrode spacing, Residual mechanical stress, Geometric imperfections introduced during fabrication, Asymmetric beam dimensions.}\\\\\n\n%\\mdas{2. Magnetic bistable systems: Shape anisotropy,\n%Exchange bias,\n%Nonuniform magnetic fields,\n%Asymmetric nanomagnet geometry}\\\\\n\n%\\mdas{3. Electronic bistable circuits: Transistor mismatch,\n%Unequal feedback gains,\n%Offset voltages,\n%Different saturation characteristics.}\\\\\n\n%\\mdas{4. Ferroelectric devices: Internal electric fields,\n%Defect distributions,\n%Electrode asymmetry,\n%Nonuniform polarization switching}\n\n\\end{abstract}\n\\maketitle\n\n\\section{Introduction}\nThe operations underlying modern digital computing are built upon binary \nlogic, where information is encoded in one of two discrete states: $0$ or $1$. \nThe physical implementation of these logical operations is realized \nthrough logic gates, which form the elementary building blocks of all \ndigital circuits. As technological progress continues to drive \nminiaturization of devices toward the nanoscale, thermal fluctuations \nbecome increasingly significant and can no longer be neglected~\\cite{KISH2002144,sano2000increasing,bulsara2005no}. At such \nscales, the deterministic picture of classical logic breaks down, and the \ninterplay between logical signals, noise, and the nonlinear dynamics of \nthe system must be understood at the microscopic level. \n\n%\\textcolor{orange}{This growing relevance of thermal noise in small-scale computing has motivated proposals that treat noise not merely as a nuisance to be suppressed, but as a potential computational resource in its own right. \n%For instance, it has been shown that thermal noise itself can serve as the information carrier and clock in a digital system, offering an energy-efficient alternative to conventional noise-suppressed logic~\\cite{Kish_APL_2006}. Building on this broader perspective}, \nA particularly intriguing consequence of operating in this noisy regime \nis the phenomenon of stochastic resonance (SR)~\\cite{RevModPhys.70.223,Wiesenfeld_chaos,BULSARA2010424,Peter_prl_2003,peter_pra_1991,Adi_pre_2000,Casado-Pascual_pre,gammaitoni1993stochastic}, wherein an optimal \nlevel of noise can enhance, rather than degrade, the response of a \nnonlinear system. This counterintuitive effect --- that noise, usually \nregarded as a source of disturbance, can in fact improve the performance \nof both natural and artificial systems~\\cite{Kish_APL_2006} --- has attracted considerable \nattention across a wide range of disciplines~\\cite{Gammaitoni,Aharonov,RevModPhys.70.223,PhysRevLett.95.080503,Nori_prl,Nori_pre, Gammaitoni_prl,Astumian,Worschech,Hafiz,Li_prl}. Building on this \ninsight, the concept of logical stochastic resonance (LSR) was introduced \nby Murali et al.~\\cite{Murali_prl_2009,PhysRevA.39.4854,Murali_apl_2009,Sinha_2009,KOHAR2012957,Hou2020,Sinha_pre_2011}, who demonstrated that a \\pcmd{two-state} system driven \nby two aperiodic input signals can produce correct logical outputs within \nan optimal window of noise intensity. \n\\mdas{Here, a double-well potential representing the essential bistability \\pcmd{of the two-state system} serves as the \nphysical model of the system performing logic operations. The two wells of the \ndouble-well potential correspond to two distinct binary memory states $0$ and $1$.} \nFurthermore, structural asymmetry \\mdas{arising from different depths of the two wells} \nof the \\mdas{effective} bistable potential has been shown to play an important \nrole in enhancing logical reliability, enabling more robust logic gate operation \nin the presence of noise~\\cite{Murali_prl_2009,YU_PhysRevE_2023,Das_PRE,Das_pre_2012,Das_pre_2013,Murli_pra_2025,Zamora-Munt:10,CHENG2020109514,Dong_pre_2026,Parmananda_pre_2021,Gui_chaos,Sinha_pre_2011}.\nMotivated by these developments, researchers have investigated the \nimplementation of fundamental logic gates --- such as OR, AND, NAND, and \nNOR --- within the LSR framework~\\cite{Murali_prl_2009, YU_PhysRevE_2023,Chen_pre_2026}. \nMore recently, this line of work has been extended to realize XOR and XNOR \ngates~\\cite{Cai_2025}, demonstrating the versatility of noise-assisted \nlogic in bistable systems.\n\nIn the present work, we focus on an asymmetric bistable system in which \nthe asymmetry arises solely from a difference in well widths \\mdas{of the model double-well potential}, referred to \nhere as a width or entropic asymmetry. Such a width asymmetry has been studied \nin various physical contexts, including the mean first-passage \ntime~\\cite{ciampini2021experimental, innerbichler_2020,Chupeau_2020,QIAO20212194}, memory \nerasure~\\cite{Rai_vipul, Bechhoefer_prl}, and dynamical \nhysteresis~\\cite{ghosh2025dynamic}, where it has been shown to offer \ndistinct advantages over the symmetric case. \n\\mdas{In physical devices, the width asymmetries in the potential are particularly observed in MEMS (Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems), NEMS (Nanoelectromechanical systems), magnetic bistable systems with shape anisotropy, ferroelectric devices with defects, etc.}\n\\textcolor{black}{From an experimental \nstandpoint, potential barrier shaping has recently been \nrealized in MEMS (Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems) devices. Here, tuning the electrostatic potential \nlandscape has been shown to improve noise-assisted signal detection \nunder varying noise conditions~\\cite{MEMS_SR_2026}, demonstrating \nthat geometric modification of bistable potentials is not merely a \ntheoretical tool but an experimentally viable strategy.} \n\nInspired by these findings, \nwe investigate whether width asymmetry can similarly enhance the \nreliability of logical operations in the LSR framework. \n\\mdas{While we understand that the energetic or depth-asymmetry in the underlying potential \ncan improve the reliability of the logic response, we aim to explore this aspect for the \nbistable systems with entropic or width-asymmetric origin. \nThe idea is to provide a comparative interpretation of the outcomes in these two scenarios.}\n\n\\mdas{We indicate one important point here regarding the energy values of the binary memory states. \nIn the case of the depth-asymmetric system performing logic operations, \nthe energy values of the memory states are different even when the systems \nare not subject to any inputs. \\pcmd{This can be understood from the description of the analog circuit that was introduced to explain LSR~\\cite{Murali_apl_2009,BULSARA2010424}. Here, considering two separate thresholds, or a DC bias, or both simultaneously, makes the effective double-well potential asymmetric; the two wells of the potential differ in depth.} Therefore, the exact energy \\pcmd{of the intrinsic binary states $0$ and $1$, becomes distinct as each of them is represented by the state in a} particular well of the double-well potential. \nWhereas for the systems with width-asymmetry, the binary memory states are maintained \nat the same energy level in the static condition. Therefore, we can say that \nfor these kinds of systems, we examine the logical response for \nenergetically equivalent memory states to begin with. \nThe findings establish the distinctions between the characteristics of the \nlogic functions for these two specific classes of asymmetric systems.}\n\nThe paper is organized as follows. In Section II, the model \nand dynamics are described. \\mdas{The logic gates implementation is defined in Section III.} \nThe results have been presented and discussed in Section IV. Conclusions are presented in Section V.\n \n\\section{Model and Dynamics}\n\nWe model the logical operation \\mdas{conventionally}~\\cite{Murali_prl_2009,Murali_apl_2009,Zhang_pre,Das_PRE,YU_PhysRevE_2023,Guerra_nano_letters} through the dynamics of a \nBrownian particle confined to a one-dimensional bistable potential, subject to two external \ninput signals. The dynamics of the particle are governed by the overdamped \nLangevin equation:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\gamma \\frac{dx}{dt} = -\\frac{\\partial V(x)}{\\partial x} + I_1(t) + I_2(t) \n + \\sqrt{D}\\, \\xi(t),\n \\label{eq:langevin}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $x(t)$ denotes the position of the Brownian particle, whose value \ndetermines the logical \\mdas{output} state of the system. $\\gamma$ is the friction \n(damping) coefficient. $\\xi(t)$ is Gaussian white noise satisfying the \nstatistical properties\n\\[\n\\langle \\xi(t) \\rangle = 0, \\quad \\langle \\xi(t)\\,\\xi(t') \\rangle = \n2\\delta(t - t').\n\\]\n\\mdas{The noise term accounts for the environmental fluctuations which are common \nin logic devices of small scale.} $D$ is the diffusion coefficient, \nwhich serves as a measure of \\mdas{the strength or magnitude of the} thermal fluctuations. \nIt is related to the temperature $T$ and the damping \ncoefficient $\\gamma$ through \\mdas{the relation} $D = \\gamma k_{B}T$, where $k_{B}$ is the \nBoltzmann constant. $I_1(t)$ and $I_2(t)$ represent two external input \nsignals that encode the logical inputs. Each signal takes one of two \ndiscrete values, corresponding to logical $0$ or logical $1$, and together \nthey determine the net bias applied to the particle. \n\n\\mdas{We consider two external signals, as at least two input signals are required to construct \nthe OR, AND or NOR, NAND gates, the basic types of logic gates, which is the central goal of \nthe present study. It is evident from the Langevin dynamics model represented through the \nEq.~\\eqref{eq:langevin}, the dynamical variable gets directly influenced by the action \nof the inputs. Therefore, it is justified to consider the state variable $x$ to determine the \noutput which results from the operations of the inputs. Its value is controlled by the underlying \npotential $V(x)$ as well, which is generally considered to be of a double-well form. \nThis is because at least two distinct states are required to represent the \noutput values $0$ and $1$ emerging from the binary logic operation. \nThe double-well potential serves as the minimal model to correspond to this two-state system \nwhich can mimic the intended logic operations. The state of the Brownian particle \nin two different wells is assigned to a specific logical output value $0$ or $1$. \nFor example, when the particle is in the left well, it can be considered to denote \nthe output state $0$, and in that case, its presence in the right well will signify \nthe logical output $1$. The reverse convention can also be taken into account. \nA particular fashion of this assignment is followed depending on the type of logic gates that are \nplanned to be designed. }\n\n\\mdas{It has been reported that it is important to incorporate asymmetry in \nthis double-well potential model to obtain reliable logical responses.~\\cite{Murali_prl_2009,Murali_apl_2009} \nIn these previous studies, the asymmetry in the potential appears in terms of the different depths \nof the two potential wells, making the two logical output states energetically different.} \n\\mdas{Here,} we use an asymmetric double-well potential $V(x)$ \nfollowing the form used in Refs.~\\cite{innerbichler_2020}, where the \nasymmetry arises from differing well widths \\mdas{and shape of the barrier separating the \ntwo wells. This form of asymmetry in the potential is recognizable from the asymmetric structures \nconsidered earlier, as here the logical output states are energetically equivalent \nto start with.}. \n\nThe potential is defined as\n\\begin{align}\\label{eq:potential}\n V(x) &= h \\left[ 1 + \\left( \\frac{2x}{S(x)} \\right)^4 \n - 2\\left( \\frac{2x}{S(x)} \\right)^2 \\right], \\\\\n \\textrm{with} \\nonumber \\\\\n S(x) &= c\\,\\Theta(-x) + (2 - c)\\,\\Theta(x),\\nonumber\n\\end{align}\nwhere $h$ denotes the barrier height, $S(x)$ is a position-dependent \nscaling function that controls the relative widths of the left and right \nwells, and $\\Theta(x)$ is the Heaviside step function. The positive \nparameter $c$ introduces structural asymmetry into the potential by \nsetting the width ratio between the two wells. Unlike the erasure protocol \nconsidered in Refs.~\\cite{Rai_vipul}, \nthe potential here remains \nstatic throughout the operation; no barrier modulation is applied~\\cite{innerbichler_2020}. The \nlogical output is instead determined entirely by the net bias imposed by \nthe input signals $I_1(t)$ and $I_2(t)$. \n%Here we take $b = 0.3$ for the OR gate and $b = -0.3$ for the AND gate.\n\nWe now make Eq.~\\eqref{eq:langevin} into dimensionless form to work with \na simplified description of the dynamics. The position is scaled as \n$\\tilde{x} = x/l$, where $l$ is the distance between the two minima of \nthe potential, with numerical value equal to $1$. Time is scaled by the \nfactor $t_l = \\gamma l^2 / k_B T_R$, where $T_R$ is a reference \ntemperature, so that the dimensionless time is $\\tilde{t} = t/t_l$. \nThe factor $t_l$ effectively represents twice the time required for the \nBrownian particle to diffuse across the distance $l$. \nThe input signals are made dimensionless by scaling with the thermal energy \nper unit length as $\\tilde{I}_{1,2} = I_{1,2}\\, l/k_B T_R$.\nThe dimensionless Langevin equation then takes the form\n\\begin{equation}\n \\frac{d\\tilde{x}}{d\\tilde{t}} = 16h \\left\\{ \n \\frac{\\tilde{x}}{S(\\tilde{x})^2} - 4\\frac{\\tilde{x}^3}{S(\\tilde{x})^4} \n \\right\\} + \\tilde{I}_1 + \\tilde{I}_2 \n + \\sqrt{\\tilde{D}}\\,\\tilde{\\xi}(\\tilde{t}),\n \\label{eq:langevin_dimless}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\tilde{\\xi}(\\tilde{t})$ is the rescaled noise term, $\\tilde{D} = \nT/T_R$ is the dimensionless diffusion coefficient, and $h$ is the \ndimensionless barrier height. In the following, we drop the tildes for \nbrevity, with all quantities understood to be dimensionless. \n\n\\begin{figure*}[ht]\n% \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=4.5cm]{potential_OR.pdf}\n \\caption[]{Asymmetric bistable potential \\textbf{(a)} configuration for OR gate for \\(c=0.2\\), \\textbf{(b)} OR gate configuration for \\(c=1\\) and \\textbf{(c)} AND gate configuration for \\(c=1.8\\)}\n \\label{fig:potential}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\n\\begin{table*}[ht]\n\\centering\n\\caption{Truth tables for the OR and AND logic gates showing \nthe logical output for each input combination $(I_1, I_2)$.}\n\n\\begin{tabular*}{\\textwidth}{@{\\extracolsep{\\fill}}ccccc@{}}\n\\hline\\hline\n$I_{\\mathrm{tot} \\,= \\, I_1 +I_2}$ \n& $I_1$ and $I_2$ \n& Logical input sets \n& OR \n& AND \\\\ \n\\hline\n\n$-2$ \n& $(-1,-1)$ \n& $(0,0)$ \n& $0 \\; (x < 0)$ \n& $0 \\; (x < 0)$ \\\\\n\n$0$ \n& $(-1,1)/(1,-1)$ \n& $(0,1)/(1,0)$ \n& $1 \\; (x > 0)$ \n& $0 \\; (x < 0)$ \\\\\n\n$2$ \n& $(1,1)$ \n& $(1,1)$ \n& $1 \\; (x > 0)$ \n& $1 \\; (x > 0)$ \\\\\n\n\\hline\\hline\n\\end{tabular*}\n\n\\label{tab:OR_AND}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%55%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%trajectories\n\\begin{figure*}[ht]\n \\centering\n% \\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.75\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.92\\linewidth,height=4cm]{logical_0_response_c_0.08_0.34_1.00_D_0.050.pdf}\n% \\phantomsubcaption\n \\label{fig:traj_c1}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n \n \\vspace{0.1cm}\n% \\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.75\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.92\\linewidth,height=4cm]{logical_0_response_c_0.08_0.34_1.00_D_0.100.pdf}\n% \\phantomsubcaption\n \\label{fig:traj_c02}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n \\vspace{0.1cm}\n% \\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.75\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.92\\linewidth,height=4cm]{logical_0_response_c_0.08_0.34_1.00_D_0.250.pdf}\n% \\phantomsubcaption\n \\label{fig:trajectories_5050}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption{Input--output correspondence of the OR gate for different values of $D$ and $c$. The rows correspond to $D=0.05$, $D=0.125$, and $D=0.25$, respectively, while the columns correspond to $c=0.08$, $c=0.34$, and $c=1$, respectively.}\n \\label{fig:trajectories}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%55%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%trajectories\n\\begin{figure*}[ht]\n \\centering\n% \\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.75\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.92\\linewidth,height=4cm]{logical_AND_0_response_c_1.92_1.66_1.00_D_0.050.pdf}\n% \\phantomsubcaption\n % \\label{fig:traj_c1}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n \n \\vspace{0.1cm}\n% \\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.75\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.92\\linewidth,height=4cm]{logical_AND_0_response_c_1.92_1.66_1.00_D_0.100.pdf}\n% \\phantomsubcaption\n %\\label{fig:traj_c02}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n \\vspace{0.1cm}\n% \\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.75\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.92\\linewidth,height=4cm]{logical_AND_0_response_c_1.92_1.66_1.00_D_0.250.pdf}\n% \\phantomsubcaption\n %\\label{fig:trajectories_5050}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption{Input--output correspondence of the AND gate for different values of $D$ and $c$. The rows correspond to $D=0.05$, $D=0.125$, and $D=0.25$, respectively, while the columns correspond to $c=1.92$, $c=1.66$, and $c=1.00$, respectively.}\n \\label{fig:trajectories_AND}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\section{Logic Gate Implementation}\n\nWe discuss the realization of OR and AND logic operations in an asymmetric \nbistable potential driven by noise. In the binary framework underlying \ndigital computation, information is encoded in two discrete \nstates: ON and OFF, \\mdas{or TRUE and FALSE. The ON (or TRUE) \nand OFF (or FALSE) states are} assigned the logical values $1$ and $0$, respectively. \\mdas{Both the inputs and outputs are interpreted with this binary representation.}\n\nThe two logical inputs $I_1$ and $I_2$ each take the value $+1$ \n(logical $1$) or $-1$ (logical $0$). Their superposition forms a \nthree-level composite signal $I = I_1 + I_2$, which takes the values \n$\\{-2,\\, 0,\\, +2\\}$ corresponding to the four input combinations \n$(0,0)$, $(0,1)$\\,/\\,$(1,0)$, and $(1,1)$, respectively. The net signal \n$I$ thus acts as the driving force that biases the particle toward one \nof the two wells \\mdas{of the bistable potential Fig.~\\ref{fig:potential}}. \n\\mdas{As the occupancy of a particular well occurs as \na result of the action of the inputs, the state of the \nparticle in the given well is considered as the output.}\nWhile the bistable potential possesses two wells, the left \nwell is associated with the logical \\mdas{output} state $0$ \nand the right well with the logical \\mdas{output} state $1$. \nThe logical input--output correspondence for the OR \nand AND gates is summarized in Table~\\ref{tab:OR_AND}. \n%\\pcmd{[Since the output appears as an effect of the inputs, \n%it might be more appropriate to define inputs (cause) \n%first and then outputs (effect). So, the change of sequence \n%was considered.]}\n\n\nThe width asymmetry of the potential is controlled through the parameter \n$c$. For $c < 1$, the left well is narrower than the right, and the \nsystem realizes an OR gate, whereas for $1 < c \\leq 2$, the right well \nis narrower, and the system realizes an AND gate \\mdas{under optimal control over the noise-strength}. The symmetric case \n$c = 1$ serves as the reference configuration. The primary objective \nof this work is to systematically investigate how the degree of width \nasymmetry, modulated by $c$, influences the reliability of these logical \noperations in the presence of noise. \n\n\\mdas{Here, we point out that it is possible to consider the \nalternative definitions of the logical output states. i.e., \nthe left well can be mapped to the output state $1$ \nand the right well to $0$. In that case, the systems will \nperform as an NOR and NAND gate within the given framework.}\n\n\n\\section{Numerical results and discussions}\n\\subsection{Input-output correspondence}\nWe consider the overdamped Langevin equation~(\\ref{eq:langevin_dimless}) and solve it numerically using the improved Euler algorithm~\\cite{press1992numerical}. The Gaussian white noise term $\\xi(t)$ is generated using the Box--Muller algorithm. The time step used in the simulation is $\\Delta t = 10^{-4}$. The input signals $I_1(t)$ and $I_2(t)$ are two aperiodic signals incorporated into the Langevin dynamics. \\mdas{They appear in the form of the time-dependent square wave functions, which can have only two discrete levels. We consider these discrete magnitudes to have numerical values $1$ and $-1$, which correspond to the logical input values $1$ and $0$, respectively. Therefore,} the combination $I_1=-1$ and $I_2=-1$ indicates the logical input $(0,0)$, while $I_1=-1$ and $I_2=1$, or vice versa, signify the logical inputs $(0,1)/(1,0)$. Similarly, $I_1=1$ and $I_2=1$ corresponds to the logical input $(1,1)$, as listed in Table~\\ref{tab:OR_AND}. \n\nWe examine the input--output correspondence for different values of the asymmetry parameter $c$ \\mdas{for the OR logic gates first}. To start with, we consider the low-noise case with $D=0.05$ for different asymmetry values, namely $c=0.20$, $0.56$, and $1$, as shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:trajectories}{\\textcolor{blue}{(a)--(c)}}. In this low-noise regime, the system does not exhibit a proper logical response. When the noise strength is increased such that the barrier-height-to-noise ratio, $\\Delta U/ k_B T$, \nreaches a suitable level, for example at $D=0.125$, the system begins to show a clear logical response, as illustrated in Fig.~\\ref{fig:trajectories}{\\textcolor{blue}{(d)--(f)}}. However, upon further increasing the noise strength to $D=0.25$, shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:trajectories}{\\textcolor{blue}{(g)--(i)}}, the logical response again disappears due to excessive fluctuations induced by strong noise. Thus, at high noise strengths, random fluctuations dominate the dynamics, leading to unreliable logical responses. Therefore, the system exhibits optimal logical behavior only within an intermediate range of noise intensity. \n\n\\mdas{The same analyses have been done in the context of realizing AND logical behavior exhibited by the systems. The results for the $c$ values $ c =1.92$, $1.56$ and $1.20$ at three different noise levels have been illustrated in Fig.~\\ref{fig:trajectories_AND}{\\textcolor{blue}{(a)--(i)}}. Here, the outcomes of the logical response also show a similar dependence on the noise strength, as discussed for the OR logic systems.}\n\n\\subsection{Quantifying the Logical Response}\n\nTo quantify the reliability of the logical response in a noisy bistable \nsystem, we compute the probability of logical success $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$, \nestimated from repeated stochastic realizations of the dynamics under all \npossible combinations of logical inputs.\n\nFor each logical input combination, the system is first evolved for a \nfinite thermalization period $T_{\\mathrm{settle}}$. This allows the particle, \\mdas{the position of which represents the state of the system,}\nto approach a steady state before any measurement is performed. This step \nexcludes transient effects from the logical response, since the particle's \ninitial position may not be consistent with the applied input.\n\nFollowing the thermalization period, the system is evolved for an \nadditional measurement interval $T_{\\mathrm{measure}}$, during which the \nwell occupation is monitored. We define the time-averaged occupation \nfraction of the right well as\n\\begin{equation}\n f_+ = \\frac{t_+}{T_{\\mathrm{measure}}},\n \\label{eq:time_frac}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $t_+$ is the total time spent by the particle in the right well \n$(x > 0)$. A value of $f_+ \\simeq 1$ indicates predominant occupation \nof the right well, while $f_+ \\simeq 0$ indicates predominant occupation \nof the left well.\n\nRather than assigning the logical output from a single instantaneous \nposition of the particle, we employ a fraction-of-time occupation \ncriterion. A threshold $\\theta$ is introduced, and the logical output \nis assigned as\n\\begin{equation}\n \\text{Output} =\n \\begin{cases}\n 1 & \\text{if} \\quad f_+ > \\theta, \\\\\n 0 & \\text{if} \\quad f_+ < 1 - \\theta.\n \\end{cases}\n \\label{eq:out}\n\\end{equation}\nIf $1 - \\theta \\leq f_+ \\leq \\theta$, the trajectory is regarded as \nambiguous (constantly switching) and the trial is counted as unsuccessful. We set $\\theta = 0.98$ \nthroughout this work. This criterion ensures that a logical output is \naccepted only when the particle remains in the corresponding well for \nnearly the entire observation interval. This verifies not only correct \nswitching behaviour but also the temporal stability of the logical state \nagainst noise-induced fluctuations.\n\nThe four logical input combinations are applied sequentially in a randomly \nchosen order within each trial. A trial is considered successful only if \nall four input combinations yield the correct logical output according to \nthe chosen truth table. The probability of logical success is defined as~\\cite{Murali_prl_2009,Zhang_pre,Cai_2025}\n\\begin{equation}\n P_{\\mathrm{logic}} = \\frac{N_{\\mathrm{success}}}{N_{\\mathrm{trial}}},\n \\label{eq:P_logic}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $N_{\\mathrm{success}}$ is the number of successful trials out of \n$N_{\\mathrm{trial}}$ total realizations.\n\n\\subsubsection*{Entropic Bias}\n\nWe first consider a \\mdas{bistable} potential with width asymmetry \\mdas{between the two wells}. \\mdas{The potential has the mathematical form represented by} Eq.~\\ref{eq:potential}. \n\\mdas{This potential can be considered to have pure entropic bias between the two wells with} no energy bias. The \\mdas{quantification of the} logical response for the OR and AND gates is shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:logical_response}~{\\textcolor{blue}{(a)--(b)}}, \n\\mdas{respectively, as a function of noise strength $D$}. \\mdas{The quantifiers $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}(OR)$ and $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}(AND)$ are} evaluated over $N_{\\mathrm{trial}} = 2 \\times10^4$ trials. \n\n\\mdas{The study has been performed for a range of asymmetric systems with a varied degree of \nasymmetry in the underlying potential. For all cases, $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ exhibits a maximum \nvalue at an intermediate magnitude of the noise strength $D$ or within a given span of it. \nThis dependence on $D$ is justified by the examination of the input-output correspondence at \ndifferent noise levels discussed in the previous subsection. This variation also connects to the \nsimilar observations described previously as logical stochastic resonance~\\cite{Murali_prl_2009,Das_pre_2013,YU_PhysRevE_2023,Cai_2025,Dong_pre_2026}, where \nmaximum reliable logical response is observed at an intermediate level of noise strength. \nHowever, our findings are distinct from the previous studies where asymmetry was considered to arise due to the different depths of the two wells of the double-well potential governing the dynamics.} \n\n\\mdas{The main objective of the present work is to analyze the effect of entropic asymmetry on the\nlogical performance of the bistable system, modeled with the described double-well potential. \nBefore discussing the systematic understanding of the degree of asymmetry in the systems \non their logical performance, we first elucidate some important characteristic behavior of \nthe symmetric system as a reference point.}\n\\textcolor{black}{A notable feature of Fig.~\\ref{fig:logical_response} is the emergence of \na flat region, or plateau, in $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ at intermediate noise \nintensities as the system approaches the symmetric configuration ($c = 1$). \nThis behaviour can be understood by examining the OR gate \n(Fig.~\\ref{fig:logical_response}~{\\textcolor{blue}{(a)}}) as a representative \ncase. For $c = 1$, the potential is perfectly symmetric, with both wells \nhaving equal width and depth. The problematic input combinations for the \nOR gate are $(0,1)$ and $(1,0)$, which correspond to a vanishing net \nsignal $I_{\\mathrm{tot}} = I_1 + I_2 = 0$, yet the correct logical output \nis $1$, requiring the particle to occupy the right well. In a symmetric \npotential with no energy bias, however, there is no deterministic \npreference for either well. Consequently, at low noise the particle \nremains near its initial position; at high noise it switches between \nwells randomly with equal probability; and only at intermediate noise \nlevels do a sufficient number of trajectories reach the desired right well \nto produce a measurable logical response. The system therefore possesses \nno intrinsic directional bias, and the logical operation relies almost \nentirely on fluctuations. An analogous argument applies to the AND gate \n(Fig.~\\ref{fig:logical_response}~{\\textcolor{blue}{(b)}}), where the same \ninput combinations produce $I_{\\mathrm{tot}} = 0$ but now require the \noutput to be $0$, leading to a similar plateau structure near $c = 1$.}\n\n\\mdas{Now, we present the outcomes of our methodical analyses for the entropically asymmetric \nsystems intended to perform as logic gates. In our current study,} it is observed that systems \nwith greater width asymmetry \n\\mdas{(decreasing order of $c$ for OR logic systems and increasing magnitude of $c$ for AND logic systems)} \nconsistently outperform the symmetric case, \nyielding a higher \\mdas{maximum value for} $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ %\\pcmd{[Need to mention it is the maximum value of $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ which is actually important. Numerical value might not be required to refer to here. The comment was added to justify the inclusion of the phrase `maximum value for' in the previous sentence.]} \nacross the noise range considered. \n\\mdas{This finding implies that it is possible to construct logic gates with a certain level of reliability if a high entropic bias between the two logical output states is implemented.}\nHowever, even for the most asymmetric configuration, the \nsystem does not achieve a perfect logical response; $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ \nremains below unity for all values of $D$.\n\nWe suggest that \\mdas{although the perfect logical responses are not obtained from this class of \nsystems with width asymmetry, the outcomes have fundamental importance. \nThis is because here the left and the right potential wells of the \ndouble-well potential, i.e., the logical output states $0$ and $1$, maintain the same energy level \nto begin with, i.e., they are energetically equivalent for the unperturbed systems. \n\\pcmd{In the case of} the related previous studies~\\cite{Murali_prl_2009,Chen_pre_2026,Cai_2025} \nwhich report better logical responses, \\pcmd{involve the description of the standard framework where the resulting underlying double-well potential has different well depths.} This indicates that for those cases, \nthe two logical output states $0$ and $1$, designated by the left and the right wells of the \npotential, possess different energy values even when no input is applied to the system. This \\pcmd{fact can be explained in a physical system with refering to the depiction of an analog circuit subject to disparate thresholds, or a DC bias, or both together considered in earlier studies~\\cite{BULSARA2010424,Murali_apl_2009} \\mdas{[Refs.]}. Their presence creates an effective asymmetric bistable system or a double-well potential with two distinct values of the energy minima. \nTherefore, a fundamental energetic asymmetry appears in the intrinsic potential due \nto the different depths of its two wells, leaving the intrinsic energy values of the binary memory states at different levels.} \nOur present analysis shows an alternative and potential path to forming \nlogic systems with a moderate extent of reliability, even in situations \nwhen the output states are not inherently biased.} \n\n\\mdas{We understand that the} width \nasymmetry alone is insufficient \\mdas{to produce logic systems which can approach perfect \n($\\sim$ 100\\%) reliability}. Therefore, an additional energy bias \\mdas{will be beneficial} to \nfurther improve the logical performance. \\mdas{This fact} is investigated \\mdas{in detail} \n\\and{discussed} in the following subsection. \n\n\\begin{figure}[ht]\n\\centering\n% Left figure\n\\begin{minipage}{0.49\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=3.5cm]%\n {OR_gate_results_bias_0_t_settle_300.pdf}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\hfill\n% Right figure\n\\begin{minipage}{0.49\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=3.5cm]%\n {and_gate_results_bias_0_t_settle_300.pdf}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\caption{Probability of logical success $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ as a \nfunction of noise intensity $D$ for the (a) OR gate and (b) AND gate, \nevaluated over $N_{\\mathrm{trial}} = 2 \\times10^4$ trials. Results are shown \nfor a purely entropic potential ($b = 0$) with varying width asymmetry \nparameter $c$. The thermalization and measurement intervals are \n$T_{\\mathrm{settle}} = T_{\\mathrm{measure}} = 300$, with occupation \nthreshold $\\theta = 0.98$.}\n\\label{fig:logical_response}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsubsection*{Entropic and Energy Bias}\n\nTo investigate the combined effect of width asymmetry, \\mdas{i.e., entropic bias} \nand energy bias on logical performance \\mdas{of the systems}, \nwe introduce both simultaneously. \\mdas{This modifies the form of the potential $V(x)$ as}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Trajectory Plot for Bias case\n\n\\begin{figure*}[ht]\n \\centering\n% \\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.75\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.92\\linewidth,height=4cm]{logical_b_response_c_0.08_0.34_1.00_D_0.100.pdf}\n \\vspace{0.1cm}\n% \\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.75\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.92\\linewidth,height=4cm]{logical_b_response_c_1.92_1.66_1.00_D_0.100.pdf}\n\n \\caption{Input--output time series of the OR gate (top row, (a)--(c)) \n and AND gate (bottom row, (d)--(f)) at fixed noise intensity $D = 0.125$, \n shown for selected values of the width asymmetry parameter $c$ at their \n respective optimal bias $b_{\\mathrm{optimal}}$. Top row: $c = 0.08$ (a), \n $c = 0.34$ (b), and $c = 1.00$ (c) for the OR gate. Bottom row: \n $c = 1.92$ (d), $c = 1.66$ (e), and $c = 1.00$ (f) for the AND gate.}\n \\label{fig:trajectories_bias}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\\begin{equation}\n V(x) = h \\left[ 1 + \\left( \\frac{2x}{S(x)} \\right)^4 \n - 2\\left( \\frac{2x}{S(x)} \\right)^2 \\right] + bx\n \\label{eq:potential_modi}\n\\end{equation}\n\nHere, $b$ is an energy bias parameter that introduces a tilt in the potential, breaking the energetic equivalence of the two wells. A positive value ($b > 0$) favors the right well and is used for the OR gate, while a negative value ($b < 0$) favors the left well and \nis used for the AND gate. \\textcolor{black}{The corresponding \ninput--output time series for the case of combined entropic and \nenergy bias are shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:trajectories_bias}}\n\\pcmd{for some representative scenarios when the systems exhibit optimized logical response. The results include both OR and AND logic systems.} \n\\mdas{From the numerical simulation study with the above form of the potential,} \nit is found that neither bias \\mdas{at their individual level} \nalone is sufficient to \\mdas{produce a maximum of} $P_{\\mathrm{logic}} \\sim 1$. \nA combination of both is required to achieve \\mdas{nearly perfect} logical response \n\\mdas{in the systems.} Systems with greater width asymmetry attain a higher \n\\mdas{optimized} $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ at \\mdas{the same magnitude of the energy bias} relative to \nthe symmetric case as shown in Figs.~\\ref{fig:logical_response_bias}~{\\textcolor{blue}{(a)--(b)}}, \n\\mdas{for the OR and AND logic systems, respectively}. \n\\mdas{Moreover, further investigations reveal that a relatively weaker energy bias is sufficient \nto get maximized logical response as the degree of asymmetry increases in the system.} \n\\mdas{The observations are the same for both types of systems performing as \nOR and AND logic gates.}\n\n\\begin{figure}[ht]\n\\centering\n% Left figure\n\\begin{minipage}{0.49\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=3.5cm]{OR_gate_results_bias_0.4_t_settle_300.pdf}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\hfill\n% Right figure\n\\begin{minipage}{0.49\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=3.5cm]{and_gate_results_bias_0.4_t_settle_300.pdf}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\caption{Probability of logical success $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ as a function \nof noise intensity $D$ for the (a) OR gate and (b) AND gate, evaluated \nover $N_{\\mathrm{trial}} = 2 \\times10^4$ trials. Results are shown for an \nasymmetric double-well potential with varying width asymmetry parameter \n$c$, in the presence of a fixed energy bias $b = 0.4$ (OR gate) and \n$b = -0.4$ (AND gate). The thermalization and measurement intervals are \n$T_{\\mathrm{settle}} = T_{\\mathrm{measure}} = 300$, with occupation \nthreshold $\\theta = 0.98$.}\n\\label{fig:logical_response_bias}\n\\end{figure}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\nTo provide a global picture of the logical performance, we present the contour \nplots of $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ in the $(D,\\, b)$ plane in \nFig.~\\ref{fig:contour}~{\\textcolor{blue}{(a)--(e)}} for the OR gates and in Fig.~\\ref{fig:contour}~{\\textcolor{blue}{(f)--(j)}} for the AND \ngates, computed for several values of the width asymmetry parameter $c$. \nThese plots reveal the joint dependence of logical success on noise \nintensity and energy bias, and clearly show that increasing width \nasymmetry expands the region of high $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ toward lower \nvalues of $b$.\n\n\\begin{figure*}[ht]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.99\\linewidth,height=4.7cm]{contour_OR_all_c_with_b_1.5.pdf}\n \\label{fig:contour_OR}\n %\\vspace{0.05cm}\n \\includegraphics[width=0.99\\linewidth,height=4.7cm]{contour_AND_all_c_with_b_1.5.pdf}\n \\label{fig:contour_AND}\n \\caption{Contour plots of the logical success probability,\n $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$, in the $(D,b)$ plane.\n Panels (a)--(e) correspond to the OR gate, while panels (f)--(j)\n correspond to the AND gate, for different values of the width-asymmetry\n parameter $c$. The probabilities are estimated from\n $N_{\\mathrm{trial}} = 10^4$ independent trials. The thermalization and\n measurement times are fixed at\n $T_{\\mathrm{settle}} = T_{\\mathrm{measure}} = 300$, and the occupation\n threshold is $\\theta = 0.98$.}\n \\label{fig:contour}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\nTo isolate the effect of energy bias, we fix the noise intensity at \n$D = 0.125$ and vary the external bias $b$. \nAs shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:external_bias}\\textcolor{blue}{(a)--(b)}, systems with greater width asymmetry \nattain a higher, \\mdas{and also the maximized} $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ at a smaller \\mdas{modulus} \nvalue of $b$ \\mdas{for both types of logic gates, OR and AND}. \n\\mdas{This confirms} that entropic asymmetry reduces the \\mdas{magnitude of the} energy bias \nrequired to achieve reliable logical operation. \\mdas{Here, we mention one important point \nregarding the sign of the bias $b$, which is observed to develop the maximized logical response \nfor two different types of logic gates, OR and AND. The results show that $b$ requires a \npositive sign for the construction of the reliable OR logic gates, according to the convention in \nour present study. $b$ is found to have a negative sign for the maximum value of \n$P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ for the systems exhibiting AND logical response. This is understandable as\nthe opposite types of bias favor the formation of the OR and AND logic systems.}\n\n\\textcolor{black}{It is further observed that \nthe plateau in $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ present in the symmetric case \n(Fig.~\\ref{fig:logical_response}) disappears once a sufficient energy \nbias is applied. This can be understood as follows: the energy bias \nbreaks the well symmetry and introduces a deterministic preference \ntoward the correct output well, thereby resolving the \\mdas{matter concerning the} \nambiguous trajectories that were responsible for the plateau. \nConsequently, $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ rises sharply with $b$ for the symmetric \ncase, whereas asymmetric systems require a smaller bias to achieve \nthe same effect. This is because the well-width asymmetry already provides a \npartial directional preference.}\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[ht]\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=3.cm]{P_logic_OR_AND_subplot.pdf}\n\n\\caption{Probability of logical success $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ as a function\nof energy bias $b$ for the (a) OR gate and (b) AND gate, at fixed noise\nintensity $D = 0.125$, for several values of width asymmetry parameter\n$c$. Results are evaluated over $N_{\\mathrm{trial}} = 2 \\times10^4$ trials, with\n$T_{\\mathrm{settle}} = T_{\\mathrm{measure}} = 300$ and occupation threshold\n$\\theta = 0.98$.}\n\n\\label{fig:external_bias}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\nTo further quantify this advantage, we extract the optimal bias \n$b_{\\mathrm{optimal}}$, defined as the value of $b$ at which \n$P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ attains its maximum $P_{\\mathrm{max}}$, for each \nvalue of the asymmetry parameter $c$. \n\\mdas{This has been done for both types of logic gates, OR and AND. \nThe results have been illustrated in Fig.~\\ref{fig:optimal}~{\\textcolor{blue}{(a)--(b)}}\nfor the OR and AND logic systems, respectively.} \nAs it is inferred from the Fig.~\\ref{fig:optimal}, \n\\mdas{the modulus value of} $b_{\\mathrm{optimal}}$ increases monotonically \nas $c$ approaches the symmetric case ($c = 1$) \\mdas{for both kinds of logic gates.} \nThis investigation validates that greater width asymmetry reduces \nthe \\mdas{requirement for the} energy bias needed to maximize logical performance. \n\n\\begin{figure}[ht]\n\\centering\n% Left figure\n\\begin{minipage}{0.49\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=3.5cm]{b_optimal_or_D_0.125.pdf}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\hfill\n% Right figure\n\\begin{minipage}{0.49\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth,height=3.5cm]{b_optimal_and_D_0.125.pdf}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\caption{Optimal energy bias $b_{\\mathrm{optimal}}$ as a function of \nthe width asymmetry parameter $c$ for the (a) OR gate and (b) AND gate, \nat fixed noise intensity $D = 0.125$. $b_{\\mathrm{optimal}}$ is defined \nas the value of $b$ at which $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$ attains its maximum \n$P_{\\mathrm{max}}$. Results are evaluated over $N_{\\mathrm{trial}} = 20000$ \ntrials, with $T_{\\mathrm{settle}} = T_{\\mathrm{measure}} = 300$ and \noccupation threshold $\\theta = 0.98$.}\n\\label{fig:optimal}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\section{Conclusion}\n\n%\\mdas{Formation of logic gates, OR and AND in small systems exploiting the effect of noise (known) and entropic asymmetry.}\\\\\n\n%\\mdas{Importance: Logical output states are energetically equivalent for the unperturbed system.}\\\\\n\n%\\mdas{Entropic bias can construct logic gates with moderately reliable responses.}\\\\\n\n%\\mdas{The outcomes can be further improved with the addition of energy bias.}\\\\\n\n%\\mdas{The extent of the energy bias is reduced for systems with a greater extent of entropic asymmetry.}\\\\\n\n%\\mdas{A systematic study to understand the effect of entropic asymmetry in the formation of the logic gates}\\\\\n\nIn this work, we have systematically investigated the role of width \n(entropic) asymmetry in a bistable double-well potential on the formation \nof OR and AND logic gates via logical stochastic resonance. \n\\mdas{Previous significant studies have revealed that the introduction of depth or energetic asymmetry in the double-well potential model of the bistable system studied from the perspective of logical stochastic resonance improves the logical response of the system. However, the role of the width asymmetry in the potential, the other fundamental type of asymmetry that can be present in the systems, has not been thoroughly explored yet in this context.}\n\n\\mdas{Recently, the} width asymmetry has been shown to play important roles in \nnoise-driven phenomena \\mdas{related to barrier crossing}~\\cite{innerbichler_2020}, including \\mdas{significant dynamical processes like} memory erasure~\\cite{Rai_vipul, \nBechhoefer_prl} and dynamical hysteresis~\\cite{ghosh2025dynamic}. \nThe present study extends this \\mdas{crucial} line of investigation to the domain of \nnoise-assisted logic operations. \\mdas{This is one of the similar important areas where a thorough understanding regarding the interplay between the nonlinearity in the systems, signal and environmental noise is essential. This interpretation can suggest advancement of the efficacy of the outcome of the process. With this objective,} we have performed a methodical investigation of how the degree of entropic asymmetry, controlled by the well-width parameter $c$, \\mdas{influences the logical responses exhibited by the systems.}\n\nA key feature of the width-asymmetric potential is that the two logical \noutput states remain energetically equivalent in the unperturbed system, \nmaking the asymmetry purely geometric (entropic) in nature. \n\\mdas{This feature is distinct from previously studied cases with energetic asymmetric systems, where the intrinsic logical output states are energetically biased to perform a given logical operation. For example, the left well and the right well minima of the underlying double-well potential, representing the logical states $0$ and $1$, are maintained at different energy levels. Which minimum will have higher or lower energy as compared to the other is decided by the fact that which logical outcome is expected from the system. It has been found in earlier studies that the opposite types of energetic asymmetry support the formation of the OR and AND logic gates. Here, we show that this inherent energetic non-equivalence in the intrinsic logical output states is not essential to construct logic gates of the given kinds. One can have the advantage of starting with the energetically equivalent output states to proceed with designing the planned logic gates.}\n\nWe find that entropic asymmetry alone is sufficient to build \nlogic gates \\mdas{of OR and AND type within the present \nframework considered here,} with a moderately reliable \nlogical response \\mdas{at an optimal range of noise strength}. \\mdas{The opposite types of width asymmetry in the model double-well potential or entropic asymmetry in the system are required to be implemented to produce OR and AND logical responses. We also point out that with the alternative assignments of the logical output states, the formation of NOR and NAND gates is also possible within the given setup.} \\mdas{Methodical analyses suggest that} increasing the degree of \nwidth asymmetry consistently improves the \\mdas{maximum value of} $P_{\\mathrm{logic}}$, \\mdas{quantifying the correct logical outcomes,} relative to \nthe symmetric case. However, width asymmetry alone is not sufficient to \nachieve a highly reliable logical response \\mdas{at the optimal noise range}; a certain extent of energy \nbias is additionally required. \n\nWhen an energy bias is introduced alongside entropic asymmetry, the \nlogical performance \\mdas{of the systems} improves substantially. \\mdas{In this case, the systems exhibit nearly perfect logical responses within the optimal noise value window}. Crucially, a system with \na greater width asymmetry requires a smaller energy bias to attain the same \nlevel of logical success. This demonstrates that entropic asymmetry acts as \na geometric resource that reduces the energetic cost of reliable logic \ngate operation. These results establish width asymmetry as a meaningful and practical \ndesign parameter for noise-assisted logic devices. \n\n\\mdas{Finally, we highlight some of the cases where entropic asymmetry emerges in real scenarios. This is to assert that our present theoretical analyses can guide a systematic path in developing logic systems for practical applicability.} Geometric asymmetry \nof the described kind arises naturally in a broad class of confined physical \nenvironments --- including microfluidic \nchannels~\\cite{yang2006microfluidic, Kreuter2013, QIAO20212194, \nXU2020382} and optical trapping \nsetups~\\cite{ciampini2021experimental, innerbichler_2020, Albay:18} --- \nwhere spatial confinement produces entropic barriers that govern particle \ntransport. Recent experimental work has further demonstrated that shaping \nthe potential barrier profile in optical tweezers experiments can \nsubstantially enhance Brownian escape rates~\\cite{Chupeau_2020}, \nconfirming that width-asymmetric potentials of the kind considered here \nare experimentally accessible. \\textcolor{black}{Beyond colloidal and microfluidic \nsystems, potential shaping has also been realized in MEMS devices, \nwhere the bistable potential landscape can be controlled by tuning \nelectrostatic parameters. In this case, it has been shown that reshaping the \npotential barrier provides a reliable strategy to improve signal quality \nunder varying noise conditions~\\cite{MEMS_SR_2026}. Taken together, \nthese experimental realizations across diverse physical platforms \nconfirm that the well-width asymmetry, as a geometric property of the \npotential, \\mdas{can} constitute a practically relevant and tunable design \nparameter for noise-assisted logical operations \\mdas{in physical devices. The basics of the methodical guide towards the control of the logical outcomes through the extent of asymmetry of this kind in actual systems can be inferred from our present analyses.}}\n\n\n\\section*{Acknowledgments}\nV.R. acknowledges IIT Mandi for a fellowship. \nM.D. thanks SERB (Project No. SRG/2022/000296), \nDepartment of Science and Technology, Government of India, \nand IIT Mandi (Seed Grant No. IITM/SG/MUD/91) for financial support.\nThe High Performance Computing Cluster facility and Param Himalaya Supercomputing \nfacility managed by IIT Mandi are also acknowledged. The authors thank Dr. Harsh Soni for\ninsightful discussions. \\\\\\\\\n\\textbf{Author contributions:} M.D. conceptualized and designed the research problem.\nV.R. executed the research work. V.R. and M.D. analyzed the results. \nV.R. and M.D. prepared and finalized the manuscript draft.\\\\\\\\\nThe authors express no conflicts of interest.\n\n\n\\bibliographystyle{apsrev4-2-titles} % PRX needs titles\n\\bibliography{reference}\n\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: reference.bib\n================================================\n@article{KISH2002144,\n title = {End of Moore's law: thermal (noise) death of integration in micro and nano electronics},\n journal = {Physics Letters A},\n volume = {305},\n number = {3},\n pages = {144-149},\n year = {2002},\n issn = {0375-9601},\n doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(02)01365-8},\n url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960102013658},\n author = {Laszlo B Kish},\n abstract = {The exponential growth of memory size and clock frequency in computers has a great impact on everyday life. The growth is empirically described by Moore's law of miniaturization. Physical limitations of this growth would have a serious impact on technology and economy. A thermodynamical effect, the increasing thermal noise voltage (Johnson–Nyquist noise) on decreasing characteristic capacitances, together with the constrain of using lower supply voltages to keep power dissipation manageable on the contrary of increasing clock frequency, has the potential to break abruptly Moore's law within 6–8 years, or earlier.}\n}\n\n@article{sano2000increasing,\n title={Increasing importance of electronic thermal noise in sub-0.1 $\\mu$m Si-MOSFETs},\n author={Sano, Nobuyuki},\n journal={IEICE Transactions on Electronics},\n volume={83},\n number={8},\n pages={1203--1211},\n year={2000},\n publisher={The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers},\n url={https://globals.ieice.org/en_transactions/electronics/10.1587/e83-c_8_1203/_p}\n}\n\n\n@article{bulsara2005no,\n title={No-nuisance noise},\n author={Bulsara, Adi R},\n journal={Nature},\n volume={437},\n number={7061},\n pages={962--963},\n year={2005},\n publisher={Nature Publishing Group UK London},\n doi= {10.1038/437962a},\n url ={https://doi.org/10.1038/437962a}\n}\n\n\n@article{Kish_APL_2006,\n author = {Kish, Laszlo B.},\n title = {Thermal noise driven computing},\n journal = {Applied Physics Letters},\n volume = {89},\n number = {14},\n pages = {144104},\n year = {2006},\n month = {10},\n abstract = {A new type of computing, where thermal noise is the information carrier and the clock in a computer, is proposed. The energy requirement/dissipation is studied in a simple digital system with zero threshold voltage when the thermal noise is equal to or greater than the digital signal. In a simple realization of a thermal noise driven gate, the lower limit of energy needed to generate the digital signal is ≈1.1kT∕bit. The arrangement has potentially improved energy efficiency and it is free of leakage current, cross-talk, and ground plane electromagnetic interference problems. Disadvantage is the larger number of required elements.},\n issn = {0003-6951},\n doi = {10.1063/1.2359293},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2359293}\n}\n\n\n@article{ Peter_prl_2003,\n title = {Two-State Theory of Nonlinear Stochastic Resonance},\n author = {Casado-Pascual, Jes\\'us and G\\'omez-Ord\\'o\\~nez, Jos\\'e and Morillo, Manuel and H\\\"anggi, Peter},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},\n volume = {91},\n issue = {21},\n pages = {210601},\n numpages = {4},\n year = {2003},\n month = {Nov},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.210601},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.210601}\n}\n\n@article{peter_pra_1991,\n title = {Amplification of small signals via stochastic resonance},\n author = {Jung, Peter and H\\\"anggi, Peter},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. A},\n volume = {44},\n issue = {12},\n pages = {8032--8042},\n numpages = {0},\n year = {1991},\n month = {Dec},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevA.44.8032},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.44.8032}\n}\n@article{Wiesenfeld_chaos,\n author = {Wiesenfeld, Kurt and Jaramillo, Fernan},\n title = {Minireview of stochastic resonance},\n journal = {Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science},\n volume = {8},\n number = {3},\n pages = {539-548},\n year = {1998},\n month = {09},\n abstract = {We present an introductory overview of the subject of stochastic resonance. As researchers’ interest in the phenomenon has spread from physics to biology, new questions both fundamental and practical have emerged. After reviewing some key aspects of the subject, we describe a promising candidate for exploring the possible beneficial effects of random noise in sensory transduction.},\n issn = {1054-1500},\n doi = {10.1063/1.166335},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166335}\n}\n\n@article{Adi_pre_2000,\n title = {Nonlinear stochastic resonance: The saga of anomalous output-input gain},\n author = {H\\\"anggi, Peter and Inchiosa, Mario E. and Fogliatti, Dave and Bulsara, Adi R.},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. E},\n volume = {62},\n issue = {5},\n pages = {6155--6163},\n numpages = {0},\n year = {2000},\n month = {Nov},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.62.6155},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.62.6155}\n}\n@article{Casado-Pascual_pre,\n title = {Subthreshold stochastic resonance: Rectangular signals can cause anomalous large gains},\n author = {Casado-Pascual, Jes\\'us and G\\'omez-Ord\\'o\\~nez, Jos\\'e and Morillo, Manuel and H\\\"anggi, Peter},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. E},\n volume = {68},\n issue = {6},\n pages = {061104},\n numpages = {7},\n year = {2003},\n month = {Dec},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.68.061104},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.061104}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{RevModPhys.70.223,\n title = {Stochastic resonance},\n author = {Gammaitoni, Luca and H\\\"anggi, Peter and Jung, Peter and Marchesoni, Fabio},\n journal = {Rev. Mod. Phys.},\n volume = {70},\n issue = {1},\n pages = {223--287},\n numpages = {0},\n year = {1998},\n month = {Jan},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/RevModPhys.70.223},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.70.223}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{BULSARA2010424,\n title = {Logical stochastic resonance},\n journal = {Chemical Physics},\n volume = {375},\n number = {2},\n pages = {424-434},\n year = {2010},\n note = {Stochastic processes in Physics and Chemistry (in honor of Peter Hänggi)},\n issn = {0301-0104},\n doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2010.06.015},\n url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301010410002831},\n author = {Adi R. Bulsara and Anna Dari and William L. Ditto and K. Murali and Sudeshna Sinha},\n keywords = {Logic gates, Stochastic resonance},\n abstract = {In a recent publication it was shown that, when one drives a two-state system with two square waves as input, the response of the system mirrors a logical output (NOR/OR). The probability of obtaining the correct logic response is controlled by the interplay between the noise-floor and the nonlinearity. As one increases the noise intensity, the probability of the output reflecting a NOR/OR operation increases to unity and then decreases. Varying the nonlinearity (or the thresholds) of the system allows one to morph the output into another logic operation (NAND/AND) whose probability displays analogous behavior. Thus, the outcome of the interplay of nonlinearity and noise is a flexible logic gate with enhanced performance. Here we review this concept of “Logical Stochastic Resonance” (LSR) and provide details of an electronic circuit system demonstrating LSR. Our proof-of-principle experiment involves a particularly simple realization of a two-state system realized by two adjustable thresholds. We also review CMOS implementations of a simple LSR circuit, and the concatenation of these LSR modules to emulate combinational logic, such as data flip-flop and full adder operations.}\n}\n\n@article{Aharonov,\n title = {Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Long-Range Correlated Noise},\n author = {Aharonov, Dorit and Kitaev, Alexei and Preskill, John},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},\n volume = {96},\n issue = {5},\n pages = {050504},\n numpages = {4},\n year = {2006},\n month = {Feb},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.050504},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.050504}\n}\n\n@article{Das_PRE,\n title = {Logical response induced by temperature asymmetry},\n author = {Das, Moupriya and Kantz, Holger},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. E},\n volume = {100},\n issue = {3},\n pages = {032108},\n numpages = {8},\n year = {2019},\n month = {Sep},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.100.032108},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.100.032108}\n}\n@article{Das_pre_2012,\n title = {Logic gates for entropic transport},\n author = {Das, Moupriya and Mondal, Debasish and Ray, Deb Shankar},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. E},\n volume = {86},\n issue = {4},\n pages = {041112},\n numpages = {10},\n year = {2012},\n month = {Oct},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.86.041112},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.041112}\n}\n@article{Das_pre_2013,\n title = {Control of logic gates by dichotomous noise in energetic and entropic systems},\n author = {Das, Moupriya and Ray, Deb Shankar},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. E},\n volume = {88},\n issue = {3},\n pages = {032122},\n numpages = {14},\n year = {2013},\n month = {Sep},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.88.032122},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.032122}\n}\n@article{Chen_pre_2026,\n title = {Reconfigurable logic gates and latches in noise-driven bistable systems: A mean first-passage time approach},\n author = {Chen, Zi-yi and Jiang, Long and Lu, Lu-lu and Pei, Qi-ming and Yu, Dong},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. E},\n volume = {113},\n issue = {5},\n pages = {054218},\n numpages = {10},\n year = {2026},\n month = {May},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/5lcv-g4bx},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/5lcv-g4bx}\n}\n\n@article{Murli_pra_2025,\n title = {Deterministic chaos for parallel invertible logic},\n author = {Murali, K. and Sinha, Sudeshna},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. Appl.},\n volume = {23},\n issue = {3},\n pages = {034010},\n numpages = {11},\n year = {2025},\n month = {Mar},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034010},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034010}\n}\n@article{Zamora-Munt:10,\n author = {J. Zamora-Munt and C. Masoller},\n journal = {Opt. Express},\n keywords = {Laser theory; Vertical cavity surface emitting lasers; Laser Doppler velocimetry; Optical fields; Optical systems; Semiconductor lasers; Transverse effects; Vertical cavity surface emitting lasers},\n number = {16},\n pages = {16418--16429},\n publisher = {Optica Publishing Group},\n title = {Numerical implementation of a VCSEL-based stochastic logic gate via polarization bistability},\n volume = {18},\n month = {Aug},\n year = {2010},\n url = {https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-18-16-16418},\n doi = {10.1364/OE.18.016418},\n abstract = {We study the interplay of polarization bistability, spontaneous emission noise and aperiodic current modulation in vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VCSELs). We demonstrate the phenomenon of logic stochastic resonance (LSR), by which the laser gives robust and reliable logic response to two logic inputs encoded in an aperiodic signal directly modulating the laser bias current. The probability of a correct response is controlled by the noise strength, and is equal to 1 in a wide region of noise strengths. LSR is associated with optimal noise-activated polarization switchings (the so-called ``inter-well'' dynamics if one considers the VCSEL as a bistable system described by a double-well potential) and optimal sensitivity to spontaneous emission in each polarization (the ``intra-well'' dynamics in the double-well potential picture). The robust nature of LSR in VCSELs offers interesting perspectives for novel applications and provides yet another example of a driven nonlinear optical system where noise can be employed constructively.}\n}\n@article{Gammaitoni,\n author = {Gammaitoni, L.},\n title = {Noise limited computational speed},\n journal = {Applied Physics Letters},\n volume = {91},\n number = {22},\n pages = {224104},\n year = {2007},\n month = {11},\n abstract = {In modern transistor based logic gates, the impact of noise on computation has become increasingly relevant since the voltage scaling strategy aimed at decreasing the dissipated power, has increased the probability of error due to the reduced switching threshold voltages. In this paper, we discuss the role of noise in a two state model that mimic the dynamics of standard logic gates and show that the presence of the noise sets a fundamental limit to the computing speed. An optimal idle time interval that minimizes the error probability is derived.},\n issn = {0003-6951},\n doi = {10.1063/1.2817968},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2817968}\n}\n@article{CHENG2020109514,\n title = {Sine-Wiener bounded noise-induced logical stochastic resonance in a two-well potential system},\n journal = {Chaos, Solitons \\& Fractals},\n volume = {131},\n pages = {109514},\n year = {2020},\n issn = {0960-0779},\n doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109514},\n url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077919304667},\n author = {Guanghui Cheng and Weidan Liu and Rong Gui and Yuangen Yao},\n keywords = {Stochastic resonance, Logical stochastic resonance, Sine-Wiener bounded noise},\n abstract = {Some noisy nonlinear system can be used to realize reliable logic operation based on the mechanism of logical stochastic resonance (LSR). However, most previous studies focus mainly on Gaussian noise-driven system. In this paper, the effect of non-Gaussian sine-Wiener (SW) bounded noise on the reliability and agility of logic system is explored based on a SW noise-driven two-potential well system. The success probability P of obtaining desired reliable logic operation increases quickly, reaches a maximum of P = 1, and then decrease with the increase of noise intensity or self-correlation time of SW noise, showing the occurrence of LSR. Furthermore, with increasing self-correlation time of SW noise, the optimal window of noise intensity moves toward left and becomes narrower. For too long self-correlation time, SW noise cannot induce LSR. The optimal parameter regions of SW noise are strongly dependent on bias b of logic system. Therefore, adjusting bias b can realize the control of noise and let noise produce constructive effect. Additionally, the agility of reliable logic gate can be improved by properly increasing noise intensity. Taken together, the results presented here are beneficial to the design of new logic devices based on LSR.}\n}\n@article{Dong_pre_2026,\n title = {Interplay between noise and higher-order interactions in the stochastic Kuramoto model: From enhancement to explosive transitions},\n author = {Yu, Dong and Tang, Yirui and Hu, Yipeng and Li, Xuening and Wang, Xueqin and Li, Tianyu and Lu, Lulu and Pei, Qiming and Jia, Ya},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. E},\n volume = {113},\n issue = {3},\n pages = {034218},\n numpages = {10},\n year = {2026},\n month = {Mar},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/pzkj-ynnt},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/pzkj-ynnt}\n}\n@article{Parmananda_pre_2021,\n title = {Emergent noise-aided logic through synchronization},\n author = {Aravind, Manaoj and Parmananda, P. and Sinha, Sudeshna},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. E},\n volume = {104},\n issue = {6},\n pages = {064207},\n numpages = {7},\n year = {2021},\n month = {Dec},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.104.064207},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.104.064207}\n}\n\n@article{Sinha_2009,\n title = {Exploiting the effect of noise on a chemical system to obtain logic gates},\n author = {Sinha, Sudeshna and Cruz, J. M. and Buhse, T. and Parmananda, P.},\n journal = {Europhysics Letters},\n pages = {60003},\n number = {6},\n year = {2009},\n month = {jul},\n publisher = {},\n volume = {86},\n doi = {10.1209/0295-5075/86/60003},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/86/60003},\n abstract = {Small added noise has been predicted to direct certain classes of chemical systems towards a specific enantiomeric direction, with the dependence of product asymmetry on noise levels being non-monotonic and nonlinear. Associating the product selection in such chemical reactions with different outputs, and varying noise levels to encode the inputs, we observe that the response of the system mirrors the input-output relations of different fundamental logic operations. So the complex enantioselection, under the influence of noise, allows the chemical system to effectively behave as a logic gate. This observation may have potential applications in the design of chemical gates, as well as provide understanding of the information processing capacity of naturally occurring chiral symmetry-breaking chemical systems, with noise acting as the logic pattern selector.}\n}\n\n@article{KOHAR2012957,\n title = {Noise-assisted morphing of memory and logic function},\n journal = {Physics Letters A},\n volume = {376},\n number = {8},\n pages = {957-962},\n year = {2012},\n issn = {0375-9601},\n doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2012.01.039},\n url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960112000643},\n author = {Vivek Kohar and Sudeshna Sinha},\n keywords = {Stochastic resonance, Memory, Logic gates, Nonlinear circuits},\n abstract = {We demonstrate how noise allows a bistable system to behave as a memory device, as well as a logic gate. Namely, in some optimal range of noise, the system can operate flexibly, both as a NAND/AND gate and a Set–Reset latch, by varying an asymmetrizing bias. Thus we show how this system implements memory, even for sub-threshold input signals, using noise constructively to store information. This can lead to the development of reconfigurable devices, that can switch efficiently between memory tasks and logic operations.}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Gui_chaos,\n author = {Gui, Rong and Zhang, Huiyu and Cheng, Guanghui and Yao, Yuangen},\n title = {Set–reset latch logic operation in a bistable system under suprathreshold and subthreshold signals},\n journal = {Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science},\n volume = {30},\n number = {2},\n pages = {023119},\n year = {2020},\n month = {02},\n abstract = {A set–reset latch is a basic building block of computers and can be used to store state information. Here, by testing the influence of the two logical input signals on the reliable set–reset latch logic operation in the bistable system, we found that there are two types of input signals, namely, suprathreshold and subthreshold signals. For the suprathreshold signals, reliable set–reset logic operation can be achieved without any driving forces and exhibits certain anti-interference ability; for the subthreshold signals, a single harmonic could induce correct set–reset latch logic operation but with a narrow optimal parameter region. The introduction of biharmonic-induced set–reset latch logic operation (logical vibrational resonance) could greatly expand the parameter region. Explanations for the above results were provided by taking the logical inputs as the dynamic bias to analyze the dynamic changes in the system. Finally, the results were further verified by circuit simulation and actual hardware circuit.},\n issn = {1054-1500},\n doi = {10.1063/1.5134888},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5134888}\n}\n\n\n@article{Hou2020,\n author = {Hou, Mingjie and Yang, Jianhua and Shi, Shuai and Liu, Houguang},\n title = {Logical stochastic resonance in a nonlinear fractional-order system},\n journal = {The European Physical Journal Plus},\n year = {2020},\n volume = {135},\n number = {9},\n pages = {747},\n doi = {10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00770-5},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00770-5},\n issn = {2190-5444},\n abstract = {We investigate logical stochastic resonance (LSR) in a nonlinear fractional-order system with an asymmetric bistable potential function. We use the success probability of the logical output to measure the logical operation ability of the system. If the success probability is 1, the logical output presents reliable LSR completely. When there are only two logical signals existing in the excitation, LSR can be realized by varying the value of the fractional order or the bias of the potential function. If the fractional order is relatively large, the system performs correct logical operations more easily. With the increase in the bias, the interval of the fractional order corresponding to LSR increases first and then decreases. When both logical signals and Gaussian white noise exist in the excitation, the intervals of the fractional order and the bias corresponding to LSR decrease with the increase in the noise intensity. In addition, with the increase in the value of the fractional order, the maximal value of the success probability also increases. Further, the system usually performs more accurate logical operations when the value of the fractional order lies in the interval [1, 1.5]. The results expand the achievements of LSR. They also provide a reference in choosing an optimal system of LSR.}\n}\n\n@article{PhysRevLett.95.080503,\n title = {Efficient Quantum Computation with Probabilistic Quantum Gates},\n author = {Duan, L.-M. and Raussendorf, R.},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},\n volume = {95},\n issue = {8},\n pages = {080503},\n numpages = {4},\n year = {2005},\n month = {Aug},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.080503},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.080503}\n}\n\n\n@article{Murali_prl_2009,\n title = {Reliable Logic Circuit Elements that Exploit Nonlinearity in the Presence of a Noise Floor},\n author = {Murali, K. and Sinha, Sudeshna and Ditto, William L. and Bulsara, Adi R.},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},\n volume = {102},\n issue = {10},\n pages = {104101},\n numpages = {4},\n year = {2009},\n month = {Mar},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.104101},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.104101}\n}\n@article{PhysRevA.39.4854,\n title = {Theory of stochastic resonance},\n author = {McNamara, Bruce and Wiesenfeld, Kurt},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. A},\n volume = {39},\n issue = {9},\n pages = {4854--4869},\n numpages = {0},\n year = {1989},\n month = {May},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevA.39.4854},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.39.4854}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Gammaitoni_prl,\n title = {Stochastic Resonance as a Bona Fide Resonance},\n author = {Gammaitoni, L. and Marchesoni, F. and Santucci, S.},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},\n volume = {74},\n issue = {7},\n pages = {1052--1055},\n numpages = {0},\n year = {1995},\n month = {Feb},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1052},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1052}\n}\n@article{Worschech,\n author = {Worschech, L. and Hartmann, F. and Kim, T. Y. and Höfling, S. and Kamp, M. and Forchel, A. and Ahopelto, J. and Neri, I. and Dari, A. and Gammaitoni, L.},\n title = {Universal and reconfigurable logic gates in a compact three-terminal resonant tunneling diode},\n journal = {Applied Physics Letters},\n volume = {96},\n number = {4},\n pages = {042112},\n year = {2010},\n month = {01},\n abstract = {Submicron-sized mesas of resonant tunneling diodes (RTDs) with split drain contacts have been realized and the current-voltage characteristics have been studied in the bistable regime at room temperature. Dynamically biased, the RTDs show noise-triggered firing of spikelike signals and can act as reconfigurable universal logic gates for small voltage changes of a few millivolt at the input branches. These observations are interpreted in terms of a stochastic nonlinear processes. The logic gate operation shows gain for the fired-signal bursts with transconductance slopes exceeding the thermal limit. The RTD junction can be easily integrated to arrays of multiple inputs and have thus the potential to mimic neurons in nanoelectronic circuits.},\n issn = {0003-6951},\n doi = {10.1063/1.3302457},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3302457}\n}\n@article{Hafiz,\n author = {Hafiz, M. A. A. and Kosuru, L. and Younis, M. I.},\n title = {Towards electromechanical computation: An alternative approach to realize complex logic circuits},\n journal = {Journal of Applied Physics},\n volume = {120},\n number = {7},\n pages = {074501},\n year = {2016},\n month = {08},\n abstract = {Electromechanical computing based on micro/nano resonators has recently attracted significant attention. However, full implementation of this technology has been hindered by the difficulty in realizing complex logic circuits. We report here an alternative approach to realize complex logic circuits based on multiple MEMS resonators. As case studies, we report the construction of a single-bit binary comparator, a single-bit 4-to-2 encoder, and parallel XOR/XNOR and AND/NOT logic gates. Toward this, several microresonators are electrically connected and their resonance frequencies are tuned through an electrothermal modulation scheme. The microresonators operating in the linear regime do not require large excitation forces, and work at room temperature and at modest air pressure. This study demonstrates that by reconfiguring the same basic building block, tunable resonator, several essential complex logic functions can be achieved.},\n issn = {0021-8979},\n doi = {10.1063/1.4961206},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4961206}\n}\n@article{Li_prl,\n title = {Stochastic Exceptional Points for Noise-Assisted Sensing},\n author = {Li, Zhipeng and Li, Chenhui and Xiong, Ze and Xu, Guoqiang and Wang, Yongtai Raymond and Tian, Xi and Yang, Xin and Liu, Zhu and Zeng, Qihang and Lin, Rongzhou and Li, Ying and Lee, Jason Kai Wei and Ho, John S. and Qiu, Cheng-Wei},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},\n volume = {130},\n issue = {22},\n pages = {227201},\n numpages = {6},\n year = {2023},\n month = {Jun},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.227201},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.227201}\n}\n@article{MEMS_SR_2026,\n title = {Signal-to-Noise Ratio Enhancement for MEMS Resonant Sensors with Potential Barrier Adjustable Stochastic Resonance},\n author = {Wu, Junhui and Zhou, Guangya},\n journal = {Microsystems \\& Nanoengineering},\n year = {2026},\n volume = {12},\n number = {1},\n pages = {84},\n doi = {10.1038/s41378-026-01201-8},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41378-026-01201-8},\n issn = {2055-7434},\n abstract = {The signature of stochastic resonance is that additional noise surprisingly enhances the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). A noise-adaptive system that learns to add an optimal amount of noise to trigger stochastic resonance and improve SNR is known as adaptive stochastic resonance. However, the current stochastic resonance mechanism fails when environmental noise exceeds the optimal noise level, as any additional noise merely worsens the SNR. In this case, instead of adding noise, stochastic resonance can be facilitated by adapting the potential energy landscape of the bistable system. Here, we propose a novel approach to enhance SNR in noisy environments, involving a potential adjustable microelectromechanical systems resonator. A periodic signal with an amplitude of 0.28 Vrms is buried in ambient noise, emulated by a white noise signal with amplitude ranging from 0.7 Vrms to 4 Vrms. Experimental results show that when the ambient noise exceeds 1 Vrms, adding additional noise leads to a decline in SNR. However, SNR enhancement induced by stochastic resonance is experimentally demonstrated by tuning the potential well of the resonator. This advancement highlights the feasibility of potential adjustable systems to overcome the limitations of conventional noise adjustable stochastic resonance methods in noisy environments. The proposed mechanism is further applied to detect periodic forces of 2.7 nN with various waveforms.}\n}\n\n@article{QIAO20212194,\ntitle = {Double stochastic resonance induced by varying potential-well depth and width},\njournal = {Journal of the Franklin Institute},\nvolume = {358},\nnumber = {3},\npages = {2194-2211},\nyear = {2021},\nissn = {0016-0032},\ndoi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.12.028},\nurl = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016003220308437},\nauthor = {Zijian Qiao and Jian Liu and Xin Ma and Jinliang Liu},\nabstract = {The role of potential-well depth and width on stochastic resonance (SR) driven by colored noise with different noise correlation times is explored and evaluated by deriving the analytic expression of output signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as a most widely used indicator for quantifying SR phenomenon. Double resonance peaks are observed and shifted between single peak and double peaks when SNR is expressed as the function of varying potential-well depth, varying potential-well width, additive noise intensity, multiplicative noise intensity and the intensity ratio between two noise, respectively. Moreover, the SR behavior induced by varying potential-well depth is different from that induced by varying potential-well width. Even the shapes of SNR curves under different correlation times and coupling strength for potential-well depth are opposite to those for potential-well width and furthermore they are also of dependence on initial conditions. Above clues may be helpful to the precise control of SR by varying potential-well depth and width separately for weak signal enhancement.}\n}\n\n@article{XU2020382,\ntitle = {Entropic stochastic resonance in a confined asymmetrical bistable system with non-Gaussian noise},\njournal = {Chinese Journal of Physics},\nvolume = {63},\npages = {382-391},\nyear = {2020},\nissn = {0577-9073},\ndoi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2019.11.009},\nurl = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0577907319309815},\nauthor = {Jinzheng Xu and Xiaoqin Luo},\nkeywords = {Entropic stochastic resonance (ESR), Asymmetrical bistable system, Non-Gaussian noise},\nabstract = {Particles moving in confined regions with bistable potential driven by weak signal and fluctuations may present a similar stochastic resonance (SR). This similar SR is called entropic stochastic resonance (ESR). The phenomenon of ESR in a confined asymmetrical bistable potential driven by a transverse periodic force is investigated when a non-Gaussian fluctuation is considered in the system. The left potential of the bistable system can be adjusted by introducing the asymmetrical ratio α. By the functional analysis and two-state theory, the approximate Signal-to-Noise ratio (SNR) is derived. It is found that there is a global maximum in the SNR curves when the asymmetrical ratio α and the noise intensity D are changed. It is also shown that the noise correlation time τ will suppress the ESR of the system and the departure q can obviously change the position of peak in the SNR. The above clues are helpful in achieving weak signal detection under irregular, small-scale systems.}\n}\n\n@article{gammaitoni1993stochastic,\n title={Stochastic resonance in paramagnetic resonance systems},\n author={Gammaitoni, Luca and Martinelli, M and Pardi, L and Santucci, Sergio},\n journal={Journal of statistical physics},\n volume={70},\n number={1},\n pages={425--435},\n year={1993},\n publisher={Springer},\n url ={https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01053979}\n}\n@article{Astumian,\n author = {Astumian, R. Dean and Moss, Frank},\n title = {Overview: The constructive role of noise in fluctuation driven transport and stochastic resonance},\n journal = {Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science},\n volume = {8},\n number = {3},\n pages = {533-538},\n year = {1998},\n month = {09},\n abstract = {Random noise is typically thought of as the enemy of order rather than as a constructive influence. Recent work has shown however that under certain circumstances, noise and Brownian motion can facilitate transmission of information via a mechanism know as stochastic resonance, and help systems use chemical energy and nonequilibrium fluctuations to drive directed motion via fluctuation driven transport. In this focus issue we have collected several articles that capture the flavor of these developing fields and point the way to new directions for research.},\n issn = {1054-1500},\n doi = {10.1063/1.166334},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166334}\n}\n\n@article{Sinha_pre_2011,\n title = {Enhancement of ``logical'' responses by noise in a bistable optical system},\n author = {Singh, Kamal P. and Sinha, Sudeshna},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. E},\n volume = {83},\n issue = {4},\n pages = {046219},\n numpages = {6},\n year = {2011},\n month = {Apr},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.83.046219},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.046219}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Murali_apl_2009,\n author = {Murali, K. and Rajamohamed, I. and Sinha, Sudeshna and Ditto, William L. and Bulsara, Adi R.},\n title = {Realization of reliable and flexible logic gates using noisy nonlinear circuits},\n journal = {Applied Physics Letters},\n volume = {95},\n number = {19},\n pages = {194102},\n year = {2009},\n month = {11},\n abstract = {It was shown recently [Murali et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 104101 (2009)] that when one presents two square waves as input to a two-state system, the response of the system can produce a logical output (NOR/OR) with a probability controlled by the interplay between the system noise and the nonlinearity (that characterizes the bistable dynamics). One can switch or “morph” the output into another logic operation (NAND/AND) whose probability displays analogous behavior; the switching is accomplished via a controlled symmetry-breaking dc input. Thus, the interplay of nonlinearity and noise yields flexible and reliable logic behavior, and the natural outcome is, effectively, a logic gate. This “logical stochastic resonance” is demonstrated here via a circuit implementation using a linear resistor, a linear capacitor and four CMOS-transistors with a battery to produce a cubiclike nonlinearity. This circuit is simple, robust, and capable of operating in very high frequency regimes; further, its ease of implementation with integrated circuits and nanoelectronic devices should prove very useful in the context of reliable logic gate implementation in the presence of circuit noise.},\n issn = {0003-6951},\n doi = {10.1063/1.3245318},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3245318}\n \n}\n@article{Guerra_nano_letters,\n author = {Guerra, Diego N. and Bulsara, Adi R. and Ditto, William L. and Sinha, Sudeshna and Murali, K. and Mohanty, P.},\n title = {A Noise-Assisted Reprogrammable Nanomechanical Logic Gate},\n journal = {Nano Letters},\n volume = {10},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1168-1171},\n year = {2010},\n abstract = { We present a nanomechanical device, operating as a reprogrammable logic gate, and performing fundamental logic functions such as AND/OR and NAND/NOR. The logic function can be programmed (e.g., from AND to OR) dynamically, by adjusting the resonator’s operating parameters. The device can access one of two stable steady states, according to a specific logic function; this operation is mediated by the noise floor which can be directly adjusted, or dynamically “tuned” via an adjustment of the underlying nonlinearity of the resonator, i.e., it is not necessary to have direct control over the noise floor. The demonstration of this reprogrammable nanomechanical logic gate affords a path to the practical realization of a new generation of mechanical computers. },\n doi = {10.1021/nl9034175},\n note ={PMID: 20218630},\n URL = { https://doi.org/10.1021/nl9034175}\n \n}\n\n\n@article{YU_PhysRevE_2023,\n title = {Theoretical description of logical stochastic resonance and its enhancement: Fast Fourier transform filtering method},\n author = {Yu, Dong and Zhan, Xuan and Yang, Li-jian and Jia, Ya},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. E},\n volume = {108},\n issue = {1},\n pages = {014205},\n numpages = {10},\n year = {2023},\n month = {Jul},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.108.014205},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.108.014205}\n}\n\n\n@article{Nori_prl,\n title = {Geometric Stochastic Resonance},\n author = {Ghosh, Pulak Kumar and Marchesoni, Fabio and Savel'ev, Sergey E. and Nori, Franco},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},\n volume = {104},\n issue = {2},\n pages = {020601},\n numpages = {4},\n year = {2010},\n month = {Jan},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.020601},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.020601}\n}\n\n@article{Nori_pre,\n title = {Geometric stochastic resonance in a double cavity},\n author = {Ghosh, Pulak K. and Glavey, Russell and Marchesoni, Fabio and Savel'ev, Sergey E. and Nori, Franco},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. E},\n volume = {84},\n issue = {1},\n pages = {011109},\n numpages = {7},\n year = {2011},\n month = {Jul},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.84.011109},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.84.011109}\n}\n\n\n@article{Cai_2025,\n title = {Realization of xor and xnor logic gates utilizing bistable potentials},\n author = {Cai, Zefeng and Zeng, Chunhua and Luo, Yuhui},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. E},\n volume = {112},\n issue = {2},\n pages = {L022201},\n numpages = {7},\n year = {2025},\n month = {Aug},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/fsjp-l38d},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/fsjp-l38d}\n}\n\n\n@article{\ninnerbichler_2020,\nauthor = {Max Innerbichler and Christoph Dellago },\ntitle = {Enhancing transport by shaping barriers},\njournal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},\nvolume = {117},\nnumber = {5},\npages = {2238-2240},\nyear = {2020},\ndoi = {10.1073/pnas.1921425117},\nURL = {https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1921425117}\n}\n\n@article{Dago_Ludovic_PhysRevLett_22,\n title = {Dynamics of Information Erasure and Extension of Landauer's Bound to Fast Processes},\n author = {Dago, Salamb\\^o and Bellon, Ludovic},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},\n volume = {128},\n issue = {7},\n pages = {070604},\n numpages = {6},\n year = {2022},\n month = {Feb},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.070604},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.070604}\n}\n\n@article{Zhang_pre,\n title = {Effect of colored noise on logical stochastic resonance in bistable dynamics},\n author = {Zhang, Lei and Song, Aiguo and He, Jun},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. E},\n volume = {82},\n issue = {5},\n pages = {051106},\n numpages = {7},\n year = {2010},\n month = {Nov},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.82.051106},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.051106}\n}\n\n\n@article{ciampini2021experimental,\n title={Experimental nonequilibrium memory erasure beyond Landauer's bound},\n author={Ciampini, Mario A and Wenzl, Tobias and Konopik, Michael and Thalhammer, Gregor and Aspelmeyer, Markus and Lutz, Eric and Kiesel, Nikolai},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.04429},\n year={2021},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2107.0442},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.0442}\n}\n\n@article{\nChupeau_2020,\nauthor = {Marie Chupeau and Jannes Gladrow and Alexei Chepelianskii and Ulrich F. Keyser and Emmanuel Trizac },\ntitle = {Optimizing Brownian escape rates by potential shaping},\njournal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},\nvolume = {117},\nnumber = {3},\npages = {1383-1388},\nyear = {2020},\ndoi = {10.1073/pnas.1910677116},\nURL = {https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1910677116},\nabstract = {Diffusion is of fundamental relevance in physics, chemistry, and biology, to explain the transport of macromolecules in a solvent, under the action of external forces. Diffusion is fueled by temperature, resulting in thermal fluctuations. Macromolecules trapped in a potential energy well can then escape, harnessing favorable fluctuations. Such events are a priori rare nevertheless, and the so-called Arrhenius relation describes the corresponding exponential decrease of escape rates with increasing barrier heights. It therefore comes as a surprise that some potential wells, with high barriers, may help the macromolecule escape. We report experimental proof of this counterintuitive boosting effect. Optimizing theoretically the potential profile that provides maximum boost, we translate our predictions into results in automated microfluidic experiments. Brownian escape is key to a wealth of physico-chemical processes, including polymer folding and information storage. The frequency of thermally activated energy barrier crossings is assumed to generally decrease exponentially with increasing barrier height. Here, we show experimentally that higher, fine-tuned barrier profiles result in significantly enhanced escape rates, in breach of the intuition relying on the above scaling law, and address in theory the corresponding conditions for maximum speed-up. Importantly, our barriers end on the same energy on which they start. For overdamped dynamics, the achievable boost of escape rates is, in principle, unbounded so that the barrier optimization has to be regularized. We derive optimal profiles under 2 different regularizations and uncover the efficiency of N-shaped barriers. We then demonstrate the viability of such a potential in automated microfluidic Brownian dynamics experiments using holographic optical tweezers and achieve a doubling of escape rates compared to unhindered Brownian motion. Finally, we show that this escape rate boost extends into the low-friction inertial regime.}}\n\n@article{Rai_vipul,\n title = {Improving the efficiency of finite-time memory erasure with potential barrier shaping},\n author = {Rai, Vipul and Das, Moupriya},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. Res.},\n volume = {8},\n issue = {2},\n pages = {023031},\n numpages = {18},\n year = {2026},\n month = {Apr},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/kwg2-b74f},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/kwg2-b74f}\n}\n\n@article{Bechhoefer_prl,\n title = {Erasure without Work in an Asymmetric Double-Well Potential},\n author = {Gavrilov, Mom\\ifmmode \\check{c}\\else \\v{c}\\fi{}ilo and Bechhoefer, John},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},\n volume = {117},\n issue = {20},\n pages = {200601},\n numpages = {6},\n year = {2016},\n month = {Nov},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.200601},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.200601}\n}\n@article{ghosh2025dynamic,\n title={Dynamic hysteresis and transitions controlled by asymmetry in potential barrier shaping},\n author={Ghosh, Samudro and Das, Moupriya},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.05465},\n year={2025},\n doi ={https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.05465},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05465}\n}\n\n\n@article{aurell2012refined,\n title={Refined second law of thermodynamics for fast random processes},\n author={Aurell, Erik and Gawȩdzki, Krzysztof and Mej{\\'\\i}a-Monasterio, Carlos and Mohayaee, Roya and Muratore-Ginanneschi, Paolo},\n journal={Journal of statistical physics},\n volume={147},\n number={3},\n pages={487--505},\n year={2012},\n publisher={Springer},\n url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10955-012-0478-x#citeas}\n}\n\n\n@article{box1958note,\n title={A note on the generation of random normal deviates},\n author={Box, George EP and Muller, Mervin E},\n journal={The annals of mathematical statistics},\n volume={29},\n number={2},\n pages={610--611},\n year={1958},\n publisher={Institute of Mathematical Statistics}\n}\n@article{press1992numerical,\n title={Numerical recipes in Fortran 77},\n author={Press, William H and Teukolsky, Saul A and Vetterling, William T and Flannery, Brian P},\n journal={The art of scientific computing},\n volume={1},\n year={1992}\n}\n\n\n@article{yang2006microfluidic,\n title={A microfluidic device for continuous, real time blood plasma separation},\n author={Yang, Sung and {\\\"U}ndar, Akif and Zahn, Jeffrey D},\n journal={Lab on a Chip},\n volume={6},\n number={7},\n pages={871--880},\n year={2006},\n publisher={Royal Society of Chemistry},\n url ={https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2006/lc/b516401j}\n}\n@article{Kreuter2013,\n author = {Kreuter, C. and Siems, U. and Nielaba, P. and Leiderer, P. and Erbe, A.},\n title = {Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Externally and Self-Propelled Colloids in Confined Geometry},\n journal = {The European Physical Journal Special Topics},\n year = {2013},\n volume = {222},\n number = {11},\n pages = {2923--2939},\n doi = {10.1140/epjst/e2013-02067-x},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2013-02067-x},\n issn = {1951-6401},\n abstract = {Over the last decades, colloidal suspensions have been proven as powerful model systems to reveal fundamental questions in soft matter or general physics. In this work, we focus on the influence of interaction and confinement on the mobility of colloidal particles as well as on the transport behavior of particles over obstacles placed in a micro-channel. Both experiments are supported with Brownian dynamics simulations. The paper concludes with an investigation of the behavior of single active swimmers close to a wall.}\n}\n\n@article{Albay:18,\n title = {Optical tweezers as a mathematically driven spatio-temporal potential generator},\n author = {John A. C. Albay and Govind Paneru and Hyuk Kyu Pak and Yonggun Jun},\n journal = {Opt. Express},\n volume = {26},\n keywords = {Fourier transforms; Laser beams; Optical force; Optical trapping; Optical tweezers; Precision metrology},\n number = {23},\n pages = {29906--29915},\n year = {2018},\n month = {Nov},\n publisher = {Optica Publishing Group},\n url = {https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-26-23-29906},\n doi = {10.1364/OE.26.029906},\n abstract = {The ability to create and manipulate spatio-temporal potentials is essential in the diverse fields of science and technology. Here, we introduce an optical feedback trap system based on high precision position detection and ultrafast feedback control of a Brownian particle in the optical tweezers to generate spatio-temporal virtual potentials of the desired shape in a controlled manner. As an application, we study the nonequilibrium fluctuation dynamics of the particle in a time-varying virtual harmonic potential and validate the Crooks fluctuation theorem in the highly nonequilibrium condition.},\n}\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091190,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31990"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31990"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Lukas Kammerer"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Lukas Kammerer, Gabriel Kronberger, Deaglan J. Bartlett, Harry Desmond, Pedro G. Ferreira, Stephan Winkler"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Evaluation of Population Initialization Methods for Genetic Programming-based Symbolic Regression"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"15 pages. Accepted for publication at EUROCAST 2026: 20th International Conference on Computer Aided Systems Theory"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.NE cs.LG"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"We analyze the effect of optimizing the initial population of genetic programming (GP) for symbolic regression (SR) on the accuracy and complexity of solutions. We compare three well-established random initialization methods as well as initialization with small optimized solutions from exhaustive symbolic regression (ESR) using a GP/SR implementation which is based on the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm NSGA-II. We compare the final Pareto fronts found with each initialization method on twelve synthetic problems of varying complexity and one real-world dataset. We find no significant differences in accuracy or model complexity among the initialization methods. The initial advantage of initialization with ESR disappears after only a few generations. Our results show that, given similar diversity in the initial population, the effect of the initialization method in GP-based symbolic regression on the final Pareto front is negligible."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:28:37 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:28:37 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Kammerer","Lukas",""],["Kronberger","Gabriel",""],["Bartlett","Deaglan J.",""],["Desmond","Harry",""],["Ferreira","Pedro G.",""],["Winkler","Stephan",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Kammerer\",\n \"Lukas\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Kronberger\",\n \"Gabriel\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Bartlett\",\n \"Deaglan J.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Desmond\",\n \"Harry\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Ferreira\",\n \"Pedro G.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Winkler\",\n \"Stephan\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: main.bbl\n================================================\n\\begin{thebibliography}{10}\n\\providecommand{\\url}[1]{\\texttt{#1}}\n\\providecommand{\\urlprefix}{URL }\n\\providecommand{\\doi}[1]{https://doi.org/#1}\n\n\\bibitem{ahmad2018comparison}\nAhmad, H., Helmuth, T.: A comparison of semantic-based initialization methods for genetic programming. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion. pp. 1878--1881 (2018)\n\n\\bibitem{bartlett2023functionsets}\nBartlett, D.J., Desmond, H., Ferreira, P.G.: Exhaustive symbolic regression function sets (2022), \\url{https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7339113}\n\n\\bibitem{bartlett2023exhaustive}\nBartlett, D.J., Desmond, H., Ferreira, P.G.: Exhaustive symbolic regression. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation \\textbf{28}(4), 950--964 (2023)\n\n\\bibitem{burke2003ramped}\nBurke, E., Gustafson, S., Kendall, G.: Ramped half-n-half initialisation bias in gp. In: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. pp. 1800--1801. Springer (2003)\n\n\\bibitem{burlacu2019hash}\nBurlacu, B., Kammerer, L., Affenzeller, M., Kronberger, G.: Hash-based tree similarity and simplification in genetic programming for symbolic regression. In: International Conference on Computer Aided Systems Theory. pp. 361--369. Springer (2020)\n\n\\bibitem{burlacu2020operon}\nBurlacu, B., Kronberger, G., Kommenda, M.: Operon {C++} an efficient genetic programming framework for symbolic regression. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion. pp. 1562--1570 (2020)\n\n\\bibitem{deb2002fast}\nDeb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: {NSGA-II}. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation \\textbf{6}(2), 182--197 (2002)\n\n\\bibitem{deng2015improved}\nDeng, Y., Liu, Y., Zhou, D.: An improved genetic algorithm with initial population strategy for symmetric tsp. Mathematical problems in engineering \\textbf{2015}(1), 212794 (2015)\n\n\\bibitem{guimera2020bayesian}\nGuimer{\\`a}, R., Reichardt, I., Aguilar-Mogas, A., Massucci, F.A., Miranda, M., Pallar{\\`e}s, J., Sales-Pardo, M.: A bayesian machine scientist to aid in the solution of challenging scientific problems. Science advances \\textbf{6}(5), eaav6971 (2020)\n\n\\bibitem{hassanat2018improved}\nHassanat, A.B., Prasath, V.S., Abbadi, M.A., Abu-Qdari, S.A., Faris, H.: An improved genetic algorithm with a new initialization mechanism based on regression techniques. Information \\textbf{9}(7), ~167 (2018)\n\n\\bibitem{koza1992}\nKoza, J.R.: Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. MIT Press (1992)\n\n\\bibitem{kronberger2024symbolic}\nKronberger, G., Burlacu, B., Kommenda, M., Winkler, S.M., Affenzeller, M.: Symbolic regression. CRC Press (2024)\n\n\\bibitem{kronberger2026guiding}\nKronberger, G., de~Franca, F.O., Bartlett, D.J., Desmond, H., Ferreira, P.G.: Guiding multi-objective genetic programming with description length improves symbolic regression solutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.22374 (2026)\n\n\\bibitem{lacava2021contemporary}\n{La Cava}, W., Orzechowski, P., Burlacu, B., {de Fran{\\c{c}}a}, F.O., Virgolin, M., Jin, Y., Kommenda, M., Moore, J.: Contemporary symbolic regression methods and their relative performance. In: Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks. vol.~1 (2021)\n\n\\bibitem{langdon2000seeding}\nLangdon, W.B., Nordin, J.: Seeding genetic programming populations. In: European Conference on Genetic Programming. pp. 304--315. Springer (2000)\n\n\\bibitem{levenberg1944method}\nLevenberg, K.: A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Quarterly of applied mathematics \\textbf{2}(2), 164--168 (1944)\n\n\\bibitem{luke2002two}\nLuke, S.: Two fast tree-creation algorithms for genetic programming. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation \\textbf{4}(3), 274--283 (2002)\n\n\\bibitem{marquardt1963algorithm}\nMarquardt, D.W.: An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics \\textbf{11}(2), 431--441 (1963)\n\n\\bibitem{mundhenk2021symbolic}\nMundhenk, T.N., Landajuela, M., Glatt, R., Santiago, C.P., Faissol, D.M., Petersen, B.K.: Symbolic regression via neural-guided genetic programming population seeding. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. pp. 24912--24923 (2021)\n\n\\bibitem{nikuradse1933stromungsgesetze}\nNikuradse, J.: Strömungsgesetze in rauhen {R}ohren. VDI-{F}orschungsheft \\textbf{361}, ~1 (1933)\n\n\\bibitem{paul2014new}\nPaul, P.V., Ramalingam, A., Baskaran, R., Dhavachelvan, P., Vivekanandan, K., Subramanian, R.: A new population seeding technique for permutation-coded genetic algorithm: Service transfer approach. Journal of Computational Science \\textbf{5}(2), 277--297 (2014)\n\n\\end{thebibliography}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[runningheads]{llncs}\n%\n\\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\\usepackage{makecell}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\n\\usepackage{tabularx}\n\n\\usepackage{pgfplots}\n\\def\\mathdefault#1{#1}\n\\pgfplotsset{compat=1.18}\n\n\\usepackage[caption=false]{subfig}\n\n\\usepackage{pgfplots}\n\\def\\mathdefault#1{#1}\n\\pgfplotsset{compat=1.18}\n\\usetikzlibrary{positioning}\n\\usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta, positioning}\n\n\n\\begin{document}\n%\n\\title{Evaluation of Population Initialization Methods for Genetic Programming-based Symbolic Regression}\n%\n\\titlerunning{Evaluation of Population Initialization Methods}\n%\n\\author{\n Lukas Kammerer\\inst{1}\\orcidID{0000-0001-8236-4294} \n \\and Gabriel Kronberger\\inst{1}\\orcidID{0000-0002-3012-3189}\n \\and Deaglan J. Bartlett\\inst{2}\\orcidID{0000-0001-9426-7723} \n \\and Harry Desmond\\inst{3}\\orcidID{0000-0003-0685-9791} \n \\and Pedro G. Ferreira\\inst{2}\\orcidID{0000-0002-3021-2851}\n \\and Stephan Winkler\\inst{1}\\orcidID{0000-0002-5196-4294}\n}\n%\n\\authorrunning{L.~Kammerer et al.}\n%\n\\institute{\n Heuristic and Evolutionary Algorithms Laboratory, \\\\\n University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Hagenberg, Austria \\\\\n \\and\n Astrophysics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK \\\\\n \\and\n Institute of Cosmology \\& Gravitation, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK\n \\medskip\n \\email{lukas.kammerer@fh-hagenberg.at}\n}\n%\n\\maketitle\n%\n\\begin{abstract}\nWe analyze the effect of optimizing the initial population of genetic programming (GP) for symbolic regression (SR) on the accuracy and complexity of solutions. We compare three well-established random initialization methods as well as initialization with small optimized solutions from exhaustive symbolic regression (ESR) using a GP/SR implementation which is based on the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm NSGA-II. We compare the final Pareto fronts found with each initialization method on twelve synthetic problems of varying complexity and one real-world dataset. \nWe find no significant differences in accuracy or model complexity among the initialization methods. The initial advantage of initialization with ESR disappears after only a few generations.\nOur results show that, given similar diversity in the initial population, the effect of the initialization method in GP-based symbolic regression on the final Pareto front is negligible.\n\n\\keywords{Symbolic regression \\and Genetic Programming \\and Population initialization \\and Tree creators.}\n\\end{abstract}\n%\n%\n%\n\\section{Introduction}\n\nSymbolic regression (SR) is a machine learning problem where the goal is to find a human-interpretable mathematical expression of any possible functional form that best fits a given dataset \\cite{koza1992,kronberger2024symbolic}. The most common approach to solve SR problems is genetic programming (GP), which evolves a population of individuals in the form of expression trees representing mathematical expressions. GP typically initializes a population randomly \nand then evolves it using selection, crossover, and mutation operations. This random initialization ensures a diverse set of individuals that can be used by the crossover operator to create new and potentially better models \\cite{koza1992}. \n\nMost research on improving GP/SR towards more accurate or shorter models has focused on the evolutionary process itself, for example by introducing new selection, crossover, and mutation operators \\cite{lacava2021contemporary}. Methods for creating an initial population and therefore initializing the starting condition of the evolutionary process are referred to as population seeding. These aim to provide aspects in the initial population that are beneficial for the evolutionary process, such as diversity \\cite{paul2014new,hassanat2018improved}. Given the crucial role of population diversity for the success of GP, most developments on population initialization focus on creating a uniform distribution of symbols or number of nodes in expression trees, such as the so-called \\textit{grow} method, the \\textit{full} method, the combination of the latter called the ramped half-and-half method \\cite{koza1992}, the probabilistic tree creators PTC-1 and PTC-2 \\cite{luke2002two} or the balanced tree creator (BTC) \\cite{burlacu2020operon}.\n\nDifferent approaches to population seeding exist to deliberately bias initial populations. Methods that optimize the initial population's fitness showed clear improvements in combinatorial optimization \\cite{paul2014new,deng2015improved,hassanat2018improved}, while related attempts in GP for program synthesis \\cite{ahmad2018comparison} did not provide significant improvements over random initialization. Another approach by Langdon and Nordin \\cite{langdon2000seeding} took overfit individuals as the initial population and used GP with parsimony pressure to identify well-generalizing models. Mundhenk et al.~\\cite{mundhenk2021symbolic} used a recurrent neural network (RNN) to generate an initial population. After short GP runs that were seeded with the RNN, the best final models were then used to further train the RNN and generate a new population.\n\n\nThis work analyses the effects of optimizing the initial population versus well-established random initialization methods. \nOur main hypothesis is that an initial population that is already strong in accuracy and complexity either accelerates convergence or improves the final Pareto front, provided that it retains sufficient diversity. \n\nTo check this, we use short, well-fitting expressions produced by exhaustive symbolic regression (ESR) \\cite{bartlett2023exhaustive} for the initial GP population instead of random seeding. ESR performs a brute-force search over the space of all possible algebraically unique functional forms up to a certain number of nodes in the expression tree, which is referred to as complexity. Parameters are optimized numerically, and we assume in our experiments that the best parameters are found for each functional form. Due to its exhaustive nature, ESR is limited to a much smaller search space than GP/SR and covers only short, univariate models of complexity up to ten. We use the GP/SR implementation Operon\\footnote{specifically the Python wrapper \\textit{PyOperon}, version 0.6.0.} \\cite{burlacu2020operon} which has shown strong performance on SR benchmarks \\cite{lacava2021contemporary}. \n\nAs baselines for comparison, we use the grow initialization method, PTC-2, and BTC. The grow method \\cite{koza1992} creates trees of any complexity and shape within a given depth limit, which is the only available parameter to control the shape of the resulting trees. Due to this lack of fine-grained model complexity control, the grow method might generate only small or imbalanced trees that lead to low diversity, or too large trees \\cite{luke2002two,burke2003ramped}. PTC-2 \\cite{luke2002two} creates trees from a customizable distribution of model complexity and operator occurrence. By default, Operon uses the balanced tree creator, BTC, which tends to build balanced trees of minimal depth and uniformly distributed complexities \\cite{burlacu2020operon}.\n\nThe use of ESR for population seeding is motivated by its guarantee to find the most accurate and algebraically unique models in their shortest form within the given complexity limits \\cite{bartlett2023exhaustive}. The population returned by ESR can be considered as an optimal population with respect to accuracy and complexity within Operon's initialization complexity bounds because Operon also uses a complexity limit of ten for random initialization. ESR identifies and removes algebraically duplicate models in its search and returns a set of mathematically unique models, \nwhich leads to syntactically diverse models, as we demonstrate below.\n\n\nWe compare ESR initialization with three different random initialization methods on twelve synthetic problems of varying complexity, and one real-world problem. Our results show that the initial advantage of the ESR-initialized population quickly diminishes during the evolutionary process within only a few generations. Therefore, there is no significant improvement in terms of accuracy and complexity. Only for simple problems, in which the ground truth is very close to the best model found by ESR, do we find a significant improvement with an ESR-initialized population over the random initial population. The experiments also show that all three random initialization methods perform equally well, which implies that the specific choice of random initialization method barely has an effect on the final Pareto front of models in GP/SR.\n\nSection \\ref{sec:methodology} describes the experimental setup, including the initialization methods, the GP settings and the benchmark problems. Section \\ref{sec:results} first outlines preliminary results regarding diversity and accuracy in the initial population to ensure a proper experimental setup. It then shows the modeling results of the synthetic problems and verifies their implications on a real-world dataset. Section \\ref{sec:conclusion} discusses and concludes our work.\n\n\n\\section{Methodology}\n\\label{sec:methodology}\n\nESR is run before Operon to use the resulting set of best models as the initial population for Operon. For each dataset we run the ESR fitting phase with the same precomputed set of expressions from \\cite{bartlett2023functionsets} that uses arithmetic operators and the power function.\nTo match Operon's distribution of model complexity in the initial population, we run ESR with different maximum complexities. As we use a population size of 1000 in GP and only binary operators that result in odd complexities, we run ESR with maximum complexities of three, five, seven, and nine and take the 250 most accurate models from each run. We use duplicate models for complexity three and five as for these complexity values fewer than 250 unique models exist.\n\n\nGiven the deterministic nature of ESR (assuming perfect parameter optimization), we run it only once per problem. \nSince GP is a stochastic method, we perform 1000 repetitions of Operon with different random seeds for both ESR initialization and each random initialization method, as outlined in Figure \\ref{fig:setup}. We note that the ESR optimization process is performed in addition to GP and therefore uses additional computational budget compared to GP with computationally cheap random initialization. We compare the models from all resulting 1000 Pareto fronts of each method and plot the distribution of the error of the Pareto-optimal models from all runs over their respective complexity for all initialization methods. By comparing all distributions, we show whether changing the initial population leads to improvements regarding both accuracy and complexity in the final Pareto fronts.\n\n\\begin{figure}[b!]\n\\begin{tikzpicture}[\n node distance=1cm,\n box/.style={draw, rectangle, rounded corners, minimum width=3.4cm, minimum height=0.6cm, align=center, font=\\footnotesize},\n decision/.style={draw, diamond, aspect=2, minimum width=3cm, minimum height=0.7cm, align=center, font=\\footnotesize},\n arrow/.style={-{Latex[length=2mm]}, thick}\n]\n \n\\node[box] (start) {Problem};\n\n\\node[box, below left=0.2cm and -1.2cm of start] (method1) {Random Initialization};\n\\node[box, below right=0.2cm and -1.2cm of start] (method2) {ESR-Initialization};\n\n\\draw[arrow] (start.west) -| (method1.north) node[midway, above, font=\\footnotesize, xshift=-1.7cm, yshift=-0.3cm] {for BTC/PTC-2/grow};\n\\draw[arrow] (start.east) -| (method2.north);\n\n\\node[box, below=0.4cm of method1] (runs1) {GP};\n\\node[box, below=0.4cm of method2] (runs2) {GP};\n\n\\draw[arrow] (method1) -- (runs1);\n\\draw[arrow] (method2) -- (runs2);\n\n\\draw [arrow] ([xshift=-1.5cm] runs1.south) to [out=270,in=90, bend left=120] node[midway, left, align=right] {1000\\\\repetitions} ([xshift=-1.5cm] method1.north);\n\n\\draw [arrow] ([xshift=1.2cm] runs2.south) arc(-140:140:.5) node[pos=0.55, right, align=left] {1000\\\\repetitions};\n\n\\node[box, below=0.4cm of runs1] (pareto1) {1000 Pareto Fronts};\n\\node[box, below=0.4cm of runs2] (pareto2) {1000 Pareto Fronts};\n\n\\draw[arrow] (runs1) -- (pareto1);\n\\draw[arrow] (runs2) -- (pareto2);\n\n\\node[box, below=0.4cm of start, yshift=-2.6cm] (compare) {Compare Distributions};\n\n\\draw[arrow] (pareto1.south) |- (compare.west);\n\\draw[arrow] (pareto2.south) |- (compare.east);\n \n\\end{tikzpicture}\n\\caption{We compare all initialization methods by running 1000 repetitions of GP with different random seeds on twelve synthetic and one real-world problem. We then compare the resulting Pareto fronts for each problem.}\n\\label{fig:setup}\n\\end{figure}\n\nSince we are interested in the Pareto front of models over accuracy and complexity, we use the multi-objective NSGA-II \\cite{deb2002fast} implementation of Operon. As objectives, we use the normalized mean squared error (NMSE) and the complexity, which is also referred to as the model length. The NMSE is defined as the mean squared error divided by the variance of the target variable in the training data. We use the same hyperparameters for all experiments, which are shown in Table~\\ref{tab:operon_settings}, while only adapting the maximum complexity to specific problems. Problems 1 to 5 use a maximum complexity of 20, while Problems 6 to 12 use a maximum complexity of 50. The complexity limit for models in the initial population is set to ten, except for the grow method, which only supports a depth limit. Parameter values in randomly initialized models are sampled from a Gaussian distribution with zero mean and $\\sigma=1$. In ESR-initialized populations, we retain the parameter values that were found by ESR in each model. During the evolutionary process, parameter values in each model are optimized with the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm \\cite{levenberg1944method,marquardt1963algorithm} for a maximum of 15 iterations. \n\n\\begin{table}\n \\centering\n \\caption{GP/SR Hyperparameters used for all experiments. The maximum length depends on the problem. Other hyperparameters are set to their default values.\n }\n \\label{tab:operon_settings}\n \\begin{tabular}{l|l}\n \\hline\n Hyperparameter & Value \\\\\n \\hline\n Algorithm: & NSGA-II \\\\\n Objectives: & NMSE, Length \\\\\n Population Size: & 1000 \\\\\n Generations: & 500 \\\\\n Selection: & Tournament (size=3) \\\\\n Mutation Rate: & 25\\% \\\\\n Max.~Length: & 20 or 50 \\\\\n Max.~Initialization Length: & 10 (only ESR, PTC-2 and BTC) \\\\\n Max.~Initialization Depth: & 5 \\\\\n Linear Scaling: & off \\\\\n Variable Scaling: & off \\\\\n Parameter Opt.: & LM, max.~15 iterations \\\\\n Function Set: & $+$, $-$, $\\times$, $\\div$, powerabs \\\\\n Terminal Set: & $x$, parameters \\\\\n \\hline\n \\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\nThe function set is based on the functions used by ESR, with the only difference being that univariate inverse operations are converted into binary division operations with one as the numerator. The function set consists of arithmetic operators and the composite \\textit{powerabs} operator, defined as $\\mathrm{powerabs}(a, b) = |a|^b$, which extends the power function to negative bases and ensures real-valued outputs for non-integer exponents. Operon's default linear and variable scaling was disabled to identify functions in their shortest representation and to reuse ESR's models in their original form. The most relevant parameters are shown in Table~\\ref{tab:operon_settings}. All other parameters are set to their default values. \n\n\nWe use twelve synthetic problems with varying complexity and a small noise level for comparison, as shown in Table~\\ref{tab:ground_truth_equations}. Each problem has a training set of size 100 and a test set of size 1000. \nWe choose univariate synthetic benchmarks with known noise distributions since ESR currently supports only functions of one variable and so that we can evaluate the likelihood.\nPotential univariate problems in common benchmarks \\cite{lacava2021contemporary} are too simple or lack noise specifications. Problems 1 to 6 were created by hand by combining randomly sampled ESR solutions. Problems 7 to 12 were created by letting Operon with the same hyperparameters as in Table \\ref{tab:operon_settings} with a maximum length of 50 over-fit \nto ten points of Gaussian random noise with zero mean and $\\sigma = 1$\nand then selecting and simplifying the best-fitting continuous function as ground truth. The values of $x$ are evenly spaced in the given range to prevent bias from specific training or test set samples. The value range of $x$ was chosen so that all values $f(x)$ are on a similar scale. Small Gaussian noise with zero mean and $\\sigma = 10^{-7}$ \nis added to the target variable $f(x)$ to focus on the optimization process rather than model selection.\n\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.5}\n\\begin{table}[t!]\n\\centering\n\\footnotesize\n\\caption{Ground truth equations, their complexity \nand value ranges for the twelve synthetic problems. Gaussian noise $\\mathcal{N}(0, 10^{-7})$ is added to $f(x)$.}\n\\label{tab:ground_truth_equations}\n\\begin{tabular}{c|c|l|l}\nNr. & Complexity & Ground truth $f(x)$ & $x \\in$ \\\\\n\\hline\n1 & 11 & $\\frac{1}{x + x^{{0.05}^{x} - x}}$ & $[0.6, 2.5]$ \\\\\n2 & 13 & $- 0.4 x \\left(x^{2} - 0.5\\right) + x^{x}$ & $[0.1, 1.7]$ \\\\\n3 & 13 & $\\frac{{0.16}^{- \\frac{1}{x}} x^{x}}{x + 3}$ & $[0.6, 3]$ \\\\\n4 & 11 & $x^{x - x^{3.5}} + \\frac{1}{x}$ & $[0.5, 2.5]$ \\\\\n5 & 13 & $0.1 x + \\left(\\frac{0.17}{{0.1}^{x} + 0.25}\\right)^{x}$ & $[0.5, 2.5]$ \\\\\n6 & 17 & $0.1 x + \\left(\\frac{0.17}{{0.1}^{x} + 0.3}\\right)^{x} - \\frac{0.05}{x}$ & $[0.2, 4]$ \\\\\n7 & 41 & $\\frac{\\left(- 0.05 x^{3} + \\left(0.5 x\\right)^{0.5 x}\\right) \\left(0.1 x + \\left(\\frac{0.17}{{0.1}^{x} + 0.3}\\right)^{x} - \\frac{0.05}{x}\\right)}{0.15 x + 0.98} - 0.06$ & $[0.08, 4.2]$ \\\\\n8 & 43 & \\makecell[l]{\n $\\left(-0.02 + \\frac{0.0061}{x}\\right) \\left|{x - 1}\\right|^{4.54} + 0.348$ + \\\\\n $x \\Big(\\left(0.04 x + \\frac{0.4}{x}\\right) \\Big(\\left|{x^{0.66} - 1.2}\\right|^{3.9} + \\left|{x - 6.7}\\right|^{-2.1}$ \\\\ $ - \\frac{0.14}{x}\\Big) - 0.08\\Big)$\n } & $[0.5, 4]$ \\\\ \n9 & 39 & \\makecell[l]{\n $0.339$ \\\\\\scriptsize\n $ \\left({0.73}^{{1.376}^{{1.095}^{x} {1.376}^{0.36 x^{1.661 - x}} \\left(x - 1.7\\right) \\left(x^{x - 1.7} - 1.7\\right)} \\left(x^{x - 1.8} - 1.7\\right)}\\right)$\n }\n & $[0.5, 3]$\n \\\\\n10 & 39 & $\\left(0.943 x \\left(x x^{x^{6.283}}\\right)^{- x}\\right)^{x^{0.723} x^{- 0.72 x^{9.87} \\left(x \\left(0.932 x\\right)^{x}\\right)^{- 9.9 x}}}$ & $[0.5, 1.5]$ \\\\\n11 & 39 & \\makecell[l]{\n $0.636 \\left(x + 0.318\\right)^{\\left(0.05 x^{0.47 x - 0.745}\\right)^{- x \\left(1.4 \\left({0.05}^{x^{2}}\\right) - x\\right)}} -$ \\\\\n $0.64 \\left({0.05}^{0.745 - 0.47 x}\\right)$ \n }\n & $[0.5, 3.2]$ \\\\\n12 & 37 & \\makecell[l]{\n $\\left(x - 1.6\\right) \\biggl(x^{{0.049}^{x - 1.6}} + \\left(0.27 x^{0.073} - 0.028\\right) $ \\\\ \n $ \\left(x^{{0.036}^{{0.104}^{x - 1.6} \\left(2 x - 1.6\\right)}} - 1.6\\right) \\biggr)$ \n } \n & $[0.2, 2]$ \n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\nTo verify the findings on synthetic data, we also run experiments on the one-dimensional Nikuradse dataset \\cite{nikuradse1933stromungsgesetze}, which contains measurements of friction of fluids in pipes \\cite{guimera2020bayesian}. Given the dense set of observations and its difficulty for modeling, this dataset has been used for testing SR implementations \\cite{guimera2020bayesian,kronberger2026guiding} and allows us to verify whether the results hold in a more realistic setting. It contains 362 observations, which we randomly split into a training set of 230 and a test set of 132 observations \\cite{kronberger2026guiding}. Although the noise level of the Nikuradse dataset is not explicitly specified, it is expected to be much higher than the noise level of the synthetic problems. In our experiments, we assume a noise level of $\\sigma = 0.0367$ determined as the root mean squared error (RMSE) of well-fitting models found with some exploratory GP runs. We use the same settings shown in Table \\ref{tab:operon_settings}, with a maximum complexity of 50.\n\n\n\n\\section{Results}\n\\label{sec:results}\n\nFigure \\ref{fig:ground_truth_with_esr} compares the best models found by ESR to the ground truth for each synthetic problem. Most ESR models capture the overall curvature, especially in Problems 1, 3 and 11. However, Problems 6, 7, and 12 show poor approximations. We report the root mean squared error (RMSE) in all our results which enables comparisons to the known irreducible noise level.\nThe RMSE of the best ESR models ranges between $10^{-2}$ and $10^{-1}$ in all synthetic problems, which is much higher than the noise level of $\\sigma = 10^{-7}$, despite visual similarity of the outputs.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t!]\n\\centering\n\\input{plots/ground_truth_with_esr.pgf}\n\\caption{Ground truth and 100 most accurate ESR solutions. In most problems, ESR finds models that capture the overall curvature of the ground truth but still have a high RMSE of between $10^{-2}$ and $10^{-1}$ compared to the noise level of $\\sigma = 10^{-7}$.}\n\\label{fig:ground_truth_with_esr}\n\\end{figure}\n\nAs population diversity is crucial for the success of GP and ESR does not explicitly enforce dissimilarity within its search space, we first analyze whether a population initialized with ESR provides sufficient diversity. To ensure that the subsequent evolutionary optimization is not compromised by a lack of diversity, we compare the diversity of an ESR-initialized population with randomly initialized populations using BTC, PTC-2 and the grow method. We use the hash-based tree distance \\cite{burlacu2019hash} as a measure of syntactic dissimilarity between two expression trees. The hash-based tree distance is the ratio of distinct subtrees to the total number of subtrees in both expression trees, and also accounts for commutativity of multiplication and addition. Therefore, two trees that are equal or isomorphic regarding commutativity have a tree distance of zero, while two trees that do not share a single node have a tree distance of one.\nFigure \\ref{fig:diversity} shows the mean and standard deviation of pairwise tree distances between the models in the populations of each run with error bars for each method. Since the ESR-initialized population depends on the problem, we show the distribution for each problem separately. For each random population initialization method, we show the mean across all 1000 runs as well as the average standard deviation of each of the 1000 populations. Since the random initial population is independent of the problem, we show it only once.\n\n\\begin{figure}[b!]\n\\centering\n\\input{plots/diversity.pgf}\n\\caption{The mean and standard deviation of pairwise tree distances among individuals in the initial population for each method. Higher values denote more diversity. As ESR initialization depends on the problem, the mean and standard deviation are shown for each problem separately. For the three random initialization methods, the bars show the mean and the average standard deviation of the initial populations of all 1000 runs. All methods provide similar diversity, with just slightly different averages and the grow method with higher standard deviations.}\n\\label{fig:diversity}\n\\end{figure}\n\nThe ESR-initialized populations show similar diversity across all problems. Their diversity is slightly below the diversity of populations initialized with BTC and PTC-2, but clearly within the standard deviation. The grow method shows slightly less diversity than the other methods with higher standard deviations, which is expected as it creates trees of any size and shape. Overall, the diversity of the ESR-initialized population is comparable to (although slightly lower than) the randomly initialized populations, suggesting that although the ESR-initialized population is more accurate, it is marginally less diverse which could hinder the evolutionary process.\n\nTo quantify the accuracy advantage of the ESR-initialized population over the random initialization methods, we compare the distributions of test errors of models in the initial populations before any evolutionary optimization. Figure~\\ref{fig:initial_population_test_err} shows the median and the centered 90\\% of test errors for each initialization method and problem. Invalid outputs that can occur in randomly generated models are treated as infinite. \nFor the random initialization methods, we report the average of the median and the 5\\textsuperscript{th} and 95\\textsuperscript{th} percentiles over all 1000 runs.\nAs expected, the ESR-initialized population achieves a median test RMSE one to two orders of magnitude lower than the random initialization methods, while still being clearly higher than the corresponding noise levels. The three random initialization methods yield very similar error distributions.\n\n\\begin{figure}\n\\centering\n\\input{plots/error_distribution_initial_population.pgf}\n\\caption{The distribution of test errors of models in the initial population for all methods and problems. The dots show the median and the error bars denote the 5\\textsuperscript{th} and 95\\textsuperscript{th} percentile. The bars for the three random initialization methods show the average median and percentile values across all 1000 runs. As expected, we observe a much lower median test error in the ESR-initialized population than in the random initialization methods.}\n\\label{fig:initial_population_test_err}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\nTo compare the error distributions of the final GP results of all four methods, we take the models from the Pareto front after 500 generations of all 1000 GP runs for each method and problem. Figure \\ref{fig:pareto_front_test_err} shows the distribution of test error over complexity for each problem. The area between the dashed lines \ndenotes the centered 90\\% of the test error of models at a specific complexity across all 1000 runs for a single method. The solid lines denote the median test error, and each dot indicates a specific complexity value. Given that ESR results are optimal with respect to accuracy within its search space, the dot at complexity 9 for GP with an ESR-initialized \npopulation shows the accuracy of the best ESR model. In all problems, this RMSE is between $10^{-2}$ and $10^{-1}$. We omit the training error results as they are nearly identical to the shown test results.\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[t!]\n\\centering\n\\input{plots/final_pareto_fronts_test_err.pgf}\n\\caption{\nThe distribution of test error over complexity of the Pareto-optimal models from each of the 1000 runs per initialization method for the synthetic problems. The areas between the dashed lines denote centered 90\\% of test errors and the solid line the median at a specific complexity. All methods show similar performance with very similar distributions denoted by largely overlapping areas between the dashed lines. ESR initialization shows slightly better performance only in Problem~1 but performs even slightly worse in Problems~6 and 7. \n}\n\\label{fig:pareto_front_test_err}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\nDespite the observed differences in the initial population with respect to diversity and accuracy, \nall methods perform nearly identically after the evolutionary process, with largely overlapping error distributions. Even the grow method with its slightly lower diversity and higher standard deviation performs equally well as the other methods. The ESR-initialized population also shows no clear improvement over GP with random population initialization and even performs worse in Problems 6 and 7. A visible improvement occurs only in Problem 1, where we reliably identify the ground truth with an ESR-initialized population.\n\nIn most problems, such as Problem 11,\nall error distributions overlap completely. While the ESR-initialized population provides slightly better results after approximately the first twenty generations, the randomly initialized populations catch up quickly. Figures \\ref{fig:pareto_fronts_over_generations_eq_11} and \\ref{fig:pareto_fronts_over_generations_eq_1} show the test error distributions of models from the Pareto fronts of all runs after different generation counts for each initialization method for Problems 11 and 1, respectively. Figure \\ref{fig:pareto_fronts_over_generations_eq_11} shows for Problem 11 that after generation one, GP with ESR initialization shows better results, but after ten generations, both error distributions largely overlap, with the ESR-initialized population showing only slightly better results. This difference shrinks further after 20 generations. After 200 generations, both methods show identical performance. This pattern is observed in all problems except Problem 1, which we discuss in more detail below. Many models created by the grow method exceed the complexity limits. Such models are not explicitly handled in Operon and appear on the Pareto front in the first few generations until dominated during the evolutionary process. We removed these models in early generations from our analysis as they would distort the results.\nWe note that ESR initialization, which takes roughly two hours for all complexities per problem on an AMD EPYC 7713P 2.0 GHz 64-core CPU, is computationally much more expensive \nthan the subsequent GP run, which took around only five seconds on the same CPU. These differences in computational effort \noutweigh any slight improvement in runtime of the GP run.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t!]\n\\centering\n\\input{plots/pareto_fronts_over_generations_eq_11.pgf}\n\\caption{The distribution of test error over complexity of the Pareto-optimal models from each of the 1000 runs for each initialization method in the synthetic Problem 11 after four different numbers of generations. While the ESR-initialized population performs better initially, these differences shrink continuously after ten and 20 generations until they perform equally after 200 generations.}\n\\label{fig:pareto_fronts_over_generations_eq_11}\n\\end{figure}\n\nThe only clear improvement in accuracy and complexity by the ESR initialization is observed in Problem 1. We attribute this to the ESR solution $\\hat{f}(x) = \\frac{1}{x + x^{0.0974 - x}}$ being very close to the ground truth $f(x) = \\frac{1}{x + x^{{0.05}^{x} - x}}$, and therefore only requiring minor modifications by the evolutionary process. This is consistent with the observed search progress by GP shown in Figure \\ref{fig:pareto_fronts_over_generations_eq_1}, where GP with an ESR-initialized population identifies the ground truth after only around 20 generations in most runs. In contrast, GP with random initialization methods identifies the ground truth much less frequently even after 500 generations as shown in Figure \\ref{fig:pareto_front_test_err}. \n\n\\begin{figure}\n\\centering\n\\input{plots/pareto_fronts_over_generations_eq_1.pgf}\n\\caption{The distribution of test error over complexity of the Pareto-optimal models from each of the 1000 runs for each initialization method in the synthetic Problem 1 after four different numbers of generations. In contrast to all other problems, the ESR-initialized population shows a clear improvement over the randomly initialized population, which is due to the best ESR model being very close to the ground truth.}\n\\label{fig:pareto_fronts_over_generations_eq_1}\n\\end{figure}\n\nTo ensure results are not affected by the specific algebraic representation of models selected by ESR, which uses symbolic simplification to prevent duplicates \\cite{bartlett2023exhaustive}, we also run experiments with randomly sampled algebraic representations of the selected ESR models. These experiments show nearly identical results, with no significant improvement of the ESR-initialized population over random initialization in most problems.\n\nThe results on the real-world Nikuradse dataset in Figure \\ref{fig:nikuradse_data_results} show the same pattern as in the synthetic problems and verify that this behavior is also consistent in a setting containing more noise. Figure \\ref{fig:nikuradse_data} plots the whole dataset as well as the curves of the 100 most accurate ESR models. It shows that the best ESR models provide only rough estimates with RMSE values clearly above the assumed noise level of $\\sigma = 0.03672$. Figure \\ref{fig:pareto_front_test_err_nikuradse} shows that all methods provide similar results after running GP for 500 generations with largely overlapping error distributions of the final Pareto fronts.\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\subfloat[The Nikuradse data and the 100 most accurate ESR models. The best ESR model achieves an RMSE of 0.077, around twice as high as the assumed noise level of $\\sigma = 0.03672$.\\label{fig:nikuradse_data}]{%\n \\input{plots/nikuradse_data.pgf}\\hspace{1em}\n }\\hspace{1em}%\n \\subfloat[The distribution of test error over complexity of the Pareto-optimal models from each of the 1000 runs per initialization method \\cite{nikuradse1933stromungsgesetze,guimera2020bayesian}. The areas between the dashed lines denote centered 90\\% of test errors and the solid line denotes the median at a specific complexity across all 1000 runs. \\label{fig:pareto_front_test_err_nikuradse}]{%\n \\input{plots/final_pareto_fronts_nikuradse_1d.pgf}\n }\n \\caption{The one-dimensional real-world Nikuradse dataset \\cite{nikuradse1933stromungsgesetze,guimera2020bayesian} and the GP results for each initialization method, in which we observe a similar pattern as in the synthetic problems. While ESR-initialization provides reasonable fits in the initial population, as shown in Figure \\ref{fig:nikuradse_data}, the GP yields similar results over all initialization methods, as denoted by the overlapping error distributions in Figure \\ref{fig:pareto_front_test_err_nikuradse}.}\n \\label{fig:nikuradse_data_results}\n\\end{figure}\n\nFigure \\ref{fig:pareto_fronts_over_generations_nikuradse} also shows that, for this dataset, the initial advantage of an ESR-initialized population quickly diminishes after a few generations and does not lead to more accurate or less complex models. The same observation applies to all three random initialization methods, which perform equally well.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t!]\n\\centering\n\\input{plots/pareto_fronts_over_generations_nikuradse.pgf}\n\\caption{The distribution of test error over complexity of the Pareto-optimal models from each of the 1000 runs for both methods in the Nikuradse dataset \\cite{nikuradse1933stromungsgesetze,guimera2020bayesian} after four different numbers of generations. As in the synthetic problems, the advantage of the ESR-initialized population diminishes after only a few generations and does not lead to more accurate or less complex models.}\n\\label{fig:pareto_fronts_over_generations_nikuradse}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\n\\section{Conclusion}\n\\label{sec:conclusion}\n\nDespite the intuitive assumption that optimizing the initial population for accuracy and complexity would improve the Pareto front of models in GP/SR, we find that an ESR-initialized population does not provide significant improvements over random initialization. Even with the best ESR population within the tested search space \nas GP's initial population, GP with a randomly initialized population is able to recover any information provided by ESR on its own in the final Pareto front and quickly catches up with GP with an ESR-initialized population. Only in one problem, where the ground truth is very close to the best ESR model, do we observe an improvement. In all other problems, the initial advantage quickly diminishes within only a few generations. The same observation applies to the three random initialization methods, which all perform equally well. The grow method and its limited control over the complexity of the initial population led to models that exceed the given complexity limits and provided slightly less and more varying diversity. However, even these aspects do not impair the final results. This implies that the specific choice of initialization method barely has an effect on the final results in GP/SR. \nWe recommend BTC or PTC-2 because they provide freely customizable complexity limits, are computationally inexpensive and lead to equivalent results in the subsequent evolutionary process as the grow method or ESR initialization.\n\nA limitation of our study is the small complexity in the optimized, ESR-initialized population. Although ESR provides optimal results within its supported complexity range, the error and complexity of the best ESR models are still far off from the noise level and the complexity of the ground truth. Since we observe a clear improvement in Problem 1 where the ground truth and the best ESR model are syntactically close, larger models in the initial population that are optimal in their covered search space might lead to more improvements over random initialization and increase the chance of finding a better or even optimal solution with GP.\nEven if such models in the larger-complexity initial population were not optimal, perhaps some `reasonable' guesses based on domain-specific knowledge could be beneficial, as one would expect that minor modifications to these could achieve good solutions.\n\nWe have only studied univariate problems. With higher-dimensional problems there may be differences between the random initialization methods. However, ESR cannot be used as it is limited to low dimensionality. \nAdditionally, our results are based mostly on synthetic problems and only one real-world dataset. Other real-world problems might offer different possibilities for improvements, such as biasing the population towards specific functional forms based on prior knowledge about the underlying system.\nFinally, the complexity of the test functions also plays a role. We selected test functions with a range of complexities but potentially the datasets can be approximated well with short expressions which could make it easy for GP to evolve fitting expressions, even when the generating function is not recovered exactly.\n\n\nThis work tests the effect of adapting only the initial population using ESR on the final Pareto front after many generations. Since we do observe beneficial effects of initialization, other approaches that maintain a stronger influence throughout the whole evolutionary process, such as periodic injection of elite individuals from ESR, might still lead to improvements over random initialization. \n\n\n\n\\subsubsection{\\ackname}\n{\\small\nL.K. and G.K. acknowledge support by the Austrian Federal Ministry for Economy, Energy, and Tourism, the Federal Ministry for Innovation, Mobility and Infrastructure, and the regional government of Upper Austria within the COMET project ProMetHeus (904919) supported by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG). D.J.B. acknowledges that support was provided by Schmidt Sciences, LLC. H.D. is supported by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship (grant no. 211046).\n}\n\n\\bibliographystyle{splncs04}\n\\bibliography{references}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: references.bib\n================================================\n% Encoding: UTF-8\n@inproceedings{lacava2021contemporary,\n\tauthor = {William {La Cava} and Patryk Orzechowski and Bogdan Burlacu and Fabr{\\'\\i}cio Olivetti {de Fran{\\c{c}}a} and Marco Virgolin and Ying Jin and Michael Kommenda and Jason Moore},\n\tbooktitle = {Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks},\n\tsize = {16 pages},\n\ttitle = {Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performance},\n\tvolume = {1},\n\tyear = {2021}\n}\n\n@article{bartlett2023exhaustive,\n title={Exhaustive symbolic regression},\n author={Bartlett, Deaglan J. and Desmond, Harry and Ferreira, Pedro G.},\n journal={IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation},\n volume={28},\n number={4},\n pages={950--964},\n year={2023},\n publisher={IEEE},\n keywords={external}\n}\n\n@misc{bartlett2023functionsets,\nauthor = {Bartlett, Deaglan J. and Desmond, Harry and Ferreira, Pedro G.},\ntitle = {Exhaustive Symbolic Regression Function Sets},\nyear = 2022,\npublisher = {Zenodo},\nurl = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7339113}\n}\n\n@book{kronberger2024symbolic,\n title={Symbolic regression},\n author={Kronberger, Gabriel and Burlacu, Bogdan and Kommenda, Michael and Winkler, Stephan M. and Affenzeller, Michael},\n year={2024},\n publisher={CRC Press}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{ahmad2018comparison,\n title={A comparison of semantic-based initialization methods for genetic programming},\n author={Ahmad, Hammad and Helmuth, Thomas},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion},\n pages={1878--1881},\n year={2018}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{burlacu2020operon,\n title={Operon {C++} an efficient genetic programming framework for symbolic regression},\n author={Burlacu, Bogdan and Kronberger, Gabriel and Kommenda, Michael},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 2020 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion},\n pages={1562--1570},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{burke2003ramped,\n title={Ramped half-n-half initialisation bias in GP},\n author={Burke, Edmund and Gustafson, Steven and Kendall, Graham},\n booktitle={Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference},\n pages={1800--1801},\n year={2003},\n organization={Springer}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{burlacu2019hash,\n title={Hash-based tree similarity and simplification in genetic programming for symbolic regression},\n author={Burlacu, Bogdan and Kammerer, Lukas and Affenzeller, Michael and Kronberger, Gabriel},\n booktitle={International Conference on Computer Aided Systems Theory},\n pages={361--369},\n year={2020},\n publisher={Springer},\n keywords={personal,best}\n}\n\n@article{lu2016using,\n title={Using genetic programming with prior formula knowledge to solve symbolic regression problem},\n author={Lu, Qiang and Ren, Jun and Wang, Zhiguang},\n journal={Computational intelligence and neuroscience},\n volume={2016},\n number={1},\n pages={1021378},\n year={2016},\n publisher={Wiley Online Library}\n}\n\n@article{luke2002two,\n title={Two fast tree-creation algorithms for genetic programming},\n author={Luke, Sean},\n journal={IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation},\n volume={4},\n number={3},\n pages={274--283},\n year={2002},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n\n@book{koza1992,\n\tauthor = {John R. Koza},\n\tkeywords = {genetic algorithms, genetic programming, text book},\n\tpublisher = {MIT Press},\n\ttitle = {Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection},\n\tyear = {1992}\n}\n\n% related work\n\n@article{paul2014new,\n title={A new population seeding technique for permutation-coded Genetic Algorithm: Service transfer approach},\n author={Paul, P Victer and Ramalingam, A and Baskaran, Ramachandran and Dhavachelvan, P and Vivekanandan, K and Subramanian, R},\n journal={Journal of Computational Science},\n volume={5},\n number={2},\n pages={277--297},\n year={2014},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{deng2015improved,\n title={An improved genetic algorithm with initial population strategy for symmetric TSP},\n author={Deng, Yong and Liu, Yang and Zhou, Deyun},\n journal={Mathematical problems in engineering},\n volume={2015},\n number={1},\n pages={212794},\n year={2015},\n publisher={Wiley Online Library}\n}\n\n@article{hassanat2018improved,\n title={An improved genetic algorithm with a new initialization mechanism based on regression techniques},\n author={Hassanat, Ahmad B and Prasath, VB Surya and Abbadi, Mohammed Ali and Abu-Qdari, Salam Amer and Faris, Hossam},\n journal={Information},\n volume={9},\n number={7},\n pages={167},\n year={2018},\n publisher={MDPI}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{langdon2000seeding,\n title={Seeding genetic programming populations},\n author={Langdon, William B and Nordin, JP},\n booktitle={European Conference on Genetic Programming},\n pages={304--315},\n year={2000},\n organization={Springer}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{mundhenk2021symbolic,\n title={Symbolic regression via neural-guided genetic programming population seeding},\n author={Mundhenk, T Nathan and Landajuela, Mikel and Glatt, Ruben and Santiago, Claudio P and Faissol, Daniel M and Petersen, Brenden K},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems},\n pages={24912--24923},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@article{deb2002fast,\n title={A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: {NSGA-II}},\n author={Deb, Kalyanmoy and Pratap, Amrit and Agarwal, Sameer and Meyarivan, TAMT},\n journal={IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation},\n volume={6},\n number={2},\n pages={182--197},\n year={2002},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n\n@article{levenberg1944method,\n title={A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares},\n author={Levenberg, Kenneth},\n journal={Quarterly of applied mathematics},\n volume={2},\n number={2},\n pages={164--168},\n year={1944}\n}\n\n@article{marquardt1963algorithm,\n title={An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters},\n author={Marquardt, Donald W},\n journal={Journal of the society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics},\n volume={11},\n number={2},\n pages={431--441},\n year={1963},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@article{nikuradse1933stromungsgesetze,\n title={Strömungsgesetze in rauhen {R}ohren},\n author={Nikuradse, Johann},\n journal={VDI-{F}orschungsheft},\n volume={361},\n pages={1},\n year={1933}\n}\n\n@article{guimera2020bayesian,\n title={A Bayesian machine scientist to aid in the solution of challenging scientific problems},\n author={Guimer{\\`a}, Roger and Reichardt, Ignasi and Aguilar-Mogas, Antoni and Massucci, Francesco A and Miranda, Manuel and Pallar{\\`e}s, Jordi and Sales-Pardo, Marta},\n journal={Science advances},\n volume={6},\n number={5},\n pages={eaav6971},\n year={2020},\n publisher={American Association for the Advancement of Science}\n}\n\n@article{russeil2026exploring,\n title={Exploring multi-view symbolic regression methods in physical sciences},\n author={Russeil, Etienne and Olivetti de Fran{\\c{c}}a, Fabr{\\'\\i}cio and Moinard, Guillaume and Malanchev, Konstantin and Cherrey, Maxime},\n journal={Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences},\n volume={384},\n number={2317},\n year={2026},\n publisher={The Royal Society}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{radwan2024comparison,\n title={A comparison of recent algorithms for symbolic regression to genetic programming},\n author={Radwan, Yousef A and Kronberger, Gabriel and Winkler, Stephan},\n booktitle={International Conference on Computer Aided Systems Theory},\n pages={157--171},\n year={2024},\n organization={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{kronberger2026guiding,\n title={Guiding Multi-Objective Genetic Programming with Description Length Improves Symbolic Regression Solutions},\n author={Kronberger, Gabriel and de Franca, Fabricio Olivetti and Bartlett, Deaglan J and Desmond, Harry and Ferreira, Pedro G},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.22374},\n year={2026}\n}\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091191,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31991"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31991"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Wojciech {\\L}apacz"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Wojciech {\\L}apacz, Stanis{\\l}aw Pawlak"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Amplifying Membership Signal Through Chained Regeneration"},"comments":{"kind":"null"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.LG cs.AI"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"The tendency of large generative models to memorize training data makes sample verification critical for privacy auditing and copyright enforcement. Current membership (MIA) and dataset inference (DI) attacks often rely on one-shot generations, which yield weak signals and limited sensitivity across modalities. Inspired by Model Autophagy Disorder (MAD), we introduce MADreMIA, a model-agnostic framework that enhances white-, gray-, and black-box MIA and DI. Rather than relying on shadow model training -- often infeasible for large generative models -- our framework facilitates scalable inference by leveraging inherent signals through iterative trajectories. This process utilizes chained generations across diverse modalities, where each output serves as the subsequent input, to improve membership evidence at low FPR. We demonstrate that memorized training samples exhibit significantly higher coherence and slower degradation during iterative regeneration than non-member generations. Our results show that MADreMIA provides richer signals across diverse model families and modalities; we present comprehensive evaluations for IARs, diffusion, and language models, alongside preliminary results demonstrating its potential for audio models."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:29:04 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:29:04 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Łapacz","Wojciech",""],["Pawlak","Stanisław",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Łapacz\",\n \"Wojciech\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Pawlak\",\n \"Stanisław\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: content/00_abstract.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{abstract}\n % The tendency of large generative models to memorize training data has established sample verification as a critical necessity for privacy auditing and copyright enforcement. Current dataset inference (DI) and membership inference attacks (MIAs) often rely on one-shot generations, which yield weak signals and limited sensitivity across different modalities. Inspired by Model Autophagy Disorder (MAD), we introduce MADreMIA, a model-agnostic framework that enhances white-, grey-, and black-box MIAs and DIs. Unlike conventional approaches that use a single query, our framework utilizes chained generations -- where each output informs the subsequent input -- to amplify membership evidence. We demonstrate that memorized training samples exhibit significantly higher coherence and slower degradation during iterative regeneration than non-members generations. Our results show that MADreMIA provides richer signals for both membership and dataset inference across diverse model families and modalities, including IARs, diffusion, large audio and language models.\n\n The tendency of large generative models to memorize training data makes sample verification critical for privacy auditing and copyright enforcement. Current membership (MIA) and dataset inference (DI) attacks often rely on one-shot generations, which yield weak signals and limited sensitivity across modalities. Inspired by Model Autophagy Disorder (MAD), we introduce MADreMIA, a model-agnostic framework that enhances white-, gray-, and black-box MIA and DI. Rather than relying on shadow model training -- often infeasible for large generative models -- our framework facilitates scalable inference by leveraging inherent signals through iterative trajectories. This process utilizes chained generations across diverse modalities, where each output serves as the subsequent input, to improve membership evidence at low FPR. We demonstrate that memorized training samples exhibit significantly higher coherence and slower degradation during iterative regeneration than non-member generations. Our results show that MADreMIA provides richer signals across diverse model families and modalities; we present comprehensive evaluations for IARs, diffusion, and language models, alongside preliminary results demonstrating its potential for audio models.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: content/01_intro.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Introduction}\nThe rapid development of generative AI triggered a pressing demand for training data, frequently leading to the unauthorized ingestion of private, sensitive, or copyrighted content. Consequently, with the scaling of generative models the importance of Membership inference attacks (MIAs)~\\citep{shokri2017mia} and dataset inference (DI)~\\cite{maini2021di} has become critical. Practical auditing -- ranging from protecting medical privacy~\\cite{zhang2022healthmia} to identifying licensed content~\\citep{dubinski2025cdi} or detecting benchmark contamination~\\citep{maini2024did,singh2024evaluation,zawalski2026codec} -- requires determining whether specific samples or datasets were used to shape a model's parameters. The definitive test is whether a model retains a structural ''echo'' of its training data, manifesting itself as a high-fidelity memorization signal that can be surfaced through targeted inference. Existing auditing methods, however, face a significant bottleneck. Most extract evidence from a single query~\\citep{zhang2024minkpp,wu2024yoqo} or a set of loosely coupled samples~\\citep{choquette2021labelonlymia}. These one-shot signals are often fragile; recent evaluations on unbiased benchmarks show that many MIAs degrade significantly under distributional shifts, often performing only slightly better than random guessing~\\cite{maini2024did,dubinski2025cdi}. Furthermore, high-performance ''shadow model'' attacks~\\cite{ye2022enhanced,carlini2021zlib} -- which require training multiple auxiliary models to simulate the target -- are computationally expensive and impractical for real-world large-scale generative architectures.\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\textwidth]{figures/teaser_v6.pdf}\n \\caption{Comparison between conventional one-shot membership inference attack and our chained-generation approach. The former use a single query, which yields a weak signal that often fails to separate members from non-members. In the latter, each generation informs the next query, progressively amplifying membership evidence and improving separability: re-members \\oksign~are more coherent and degrade slower than re-non-members \\xsign.}\n \\label{fig:teaser}\n\\end{figure}\n\nTo address these limitations, we shift the perspective from a single static query to a dynamic trajectory. This concept is best illustrated through a forensic parallel: in a criminal interrogation, a suspect may maintain a lie for a single response, but that lie often collapses under the pressure of repeated, recursive follow-up questions. A truthful narrative, by contrast, remains coherent because it is grounded in a fixed reality. We argue that generative models exhibit a similar phenomenon -- their ''truth'' is the training set. While a model can produce a plausible-looking output for a non-member sample once, it may struggle to sustain that plausibility over a recursive chain of self-generated inputs.\n\nOur framework, \\textbf{MADreMIA}, is inspired by the mechanics of Model Autophagy Disorder (MAD)~\\citep{alemohammad2023mad,shumailov2024mad2}. Traditionally, MAD describes a failure mode where models trained on their own synthetic outputs progressively lose variance and collapse into a state of degenerated ''madness''. We pivot this phenomenon into a diagnostic, interference-time tool: if a sample was present during training, it acts as a stable ``attractor'' in the model’s latent space. By repeatedly feeding a model’s outputs back into itself -- creating an iterative regeneration chain -- we can amplify the signal of memorization. \n\nWithin this framework, we distinguish between two types of trajectories:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\vspace{-0.2cm}\n \\item \\colorbox{okFill}{\\textbf{Re-members}}: These are member samples (training data) that are iteratively \\textbf{re}-generated. Because the model has ''memorized'' these points, they exhibit high stability and slow semantic degradation over time.\n \\item \\colorbox{badFill}{\\textbf{Re-non-members}}: These are unseen samples that are iteratively \\textbf{re}-generated. Lacking a structural anchor in the model's weights, these samples drift rapidly toward the model's average biases or dissolve into noise (see Figure~\\ref{fig:teaser}).\n \\vspace{-0.2cm}\n\\end{itemize}\n\nMADreMIA functions as a modular, inference-time add-on that is intentionally method-, model-, and modality-agnostic. By measuring consistency across recursive loops, we provide richer signals across diverse architectures, including image autoregressive models (IARs), diffusion models (DMs), large language models (LLMs), and audio voice conversion models. We demonstrate that while a single output is often too noisy to be decisive, the trajectory of a ``re-member'' is different than ``re-non-member'' and thus acts as a powerful signal amplifier, surfacing traces of training data that are otherwise invisible.\n\nMADreMIA iterative procedure moves beyond one-shot plausibility by probing whether the model preserves semantic and structural consistency under repeated self-interaction. Consequently, this work investigates a central research question: \\emph{Can the dynamics of recursive self-generation serve as a signal amplifier to expose training data membership?}\n\nIn summary, the main contributions of our paper are:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item We introduce an \\textbf{iterative regeneration setup} to uncover data memorization invisible during single-pass inference.\n \\item We show theoretically and empirically that \\textbf{trajectory features} (generation dynamics over time) yield a significantly more statistically robust membership signal. By functioning as a variance reduction mechanism, these features isolate the underlying membership information much more effectively than standard one-shot baselines.\n \\item We propose an \\textbf{inference-time, cross-modal framework} that improves Membership and Dataset Inference efficiency across Vision and Language models without the need for expensive shadow model training.\n\\end{itemize}\n% Although valuable, these methods often produce weak and noisy signals, especially when the target example is only partially memorized, or when the model family or data modality changes.\n\n% We view model auditing through this same lens. While a classical MIA effectively asks a single question -- \\emph{Have you seen this example?} -- Dataset Inference extends this to a dataset-level question, operationalized as a collection of per-example membership tests. In contrast, we construct a chained interaction inspired by the recursive, \\textit{self-feeding} nature of Model Autophagy Disorder (MAD)~\\citep{alemohammad2023mad,shumailov2024mad2}.\\janek{explain the main finding of this MAD work in 1 sentence} Our approach, MADreMIA, builds on iterative self-conditioning of the model through its own generated outputs. Instead of evaluating a single forward pass, we repeatedly feed the model’s outputs back into itself to form a multi-step regeneration chain. Concretely, starting from an initial input, we generate an output, treat this output as a new input, and re-query the model for several iterations. This process can be instantiated across modalities, including image regeneration, audio \\textit{echo} loops, or text expansion chains. This iterative procedure moves beyond one-shot plausibility by probing whether the model preserves semantic and structural consistency under repeated self-interaction. Rather than asking whether a single output appears plausible, we measure whether the model can maintain a coherent trajectory of outputs over time.\\\\\n% \\wojtek{chcemy postawić jakieś wyboldowane main research question?}\n\n% We argue that black-box auditing of generative models should be viewed in the same way. In this analogy, the suspect is the generative model. A classical MIA effectively asks a single question: \\emph{did you see this example during training?} A DI broadens the scope by asking multiple questions about whether a dataset, concept collection, or benchmark was present in training. Our approach goes one step further: instead of evaluating isolated outputs, we construct a chained interaction in which each generation informs the next query. For images, this takes the form of iterative regenerations; for audio, echo-style continuation and reconditioning; and for language, text expansion and continuation. The resulting sequence exposes not only whether the model can produce a plausible output once, but whether it can sustain a coherent chain of outputs whose quality differs systematically between members and non-members.\n\n% This perspective leads to \\textbf{MADreMIA}, a generative framework inspired by Model Autophagy Disorder (MAD). The core idea is simple: if a sample was seen during training, then repeatedly feeding model-produced outputs back into the generation process should preserve, amplify, or reveal traces of membership more strongly than standard one-shot querying. In contrast, for non-members, the same chained process tends to drift, degrade, or lose the latent structure associated with memorized data in much faster pace. By measuring these differences over chained regenerations rather than isolated generations, we obtain stronger evidence for both membership inference and dataset inference.\n\n% Our framework is designed to be intentionally method-, model-, and modality-agnostic. By functioning as a modular add-on, it can be integrated with existing white-, grey-, or black-box membership inference attacks to significantly enhance their detection sensitivity. Although the technical implementation of the chaining mechanism varies by domain, the core principle remains universal: membership leaves an indelible footprint on the stability, fidelity, and self-consistency of iterative generations. This unified approach allows MADreMIA to transfer seamlessly across diverse architectures, including image autoregressive models (IARs), diffusion models (DMs), large language models (LLMs), and Voice Conversion (audio) models.\\janek{enumerate the strengths of our method in bulletpoints}\\wojtek{imo nie potrzeba}\n\n% In summary, we challenge the status quo of one-shot auditing, arguing that it fundamentally underutilizes the information latent within generative models. We demonstrate that while a single output is often too noisy to be decisive, a chain of regenerated outputs acts as a powerful \\textbf{signal amplifier}. By developing this concept into a model-agnostic add-on, we show that iteratively regenerated members (re-members) maintain a structural persistence that non-members simply cannot sustain. Across diverse architectures and modalities, our results confirm that the key to a confident audit lies not in the first response, but in the consistency of the iterative dialogue. The main contributions of our paper can be summarized as:\n% \\begin{itemize}\n% \\item We introduce an \\textbf{iterative regeneration setup} to uncover data memorization invisible during single-pass inference.\n% \\item We show both theoretically and empirically that trajectory features (generation dynamics over time) may \\textbf{amplify the membership signals}.\n% \\item We propose an \\textbf{inference-time, cross-modal framework} that significantly improves Membership and Dataset Inference efficiency across both LLMs and Vision models.\n% \\end{itemize}\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% NOTES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% Membership inference attacks (MIAs) and dataset inference (DIs) have become increasingly important as large generative models are trained on data whose provenance is often unclear and whose contents may be private, copyrighted, or otherwise sensitive. In practice, this matters far beyond a purely academic privacy setting. Auditors may need to determine whether a model has memorized medical records, whether a benchmark is contaminated by training data, whether a deployed model was trained on licensed content, or whether a claimed unlearning procedure truly removed the influence of designated examples. In all of these cases, the central question is not only whether a model performs well, but whether traces of specific samples or datasets remain detectable in its behavior.\n\n% \\todo{TODO}\n% \\wojtek{TODO}\n% \\stachu{TODO}\n\n% This setting has motivated a shift from white-box analysis toward black-box auditing methods. Such methods are substantially more realistic in deployment, where model weights, gradients, and internal activations are rarely accessible to external investigators. Yet black-box auditing is also fundamentally harder: the investigator sees only outputs, often under rate limits, stochastic decoding, or modality-specific generation pipelines. As a result, many existing approaches extract evidence from a single prompt--response pair or from a small set of loosely related queries. While valuable, these methods often produce weak and noisy signals, especially when the target example is only partially memorized, when the model family changes, or when the modality is not text.\n\n% A useful analogy is a suspect interrogation. If an investigator asks a suspect only a single question, it may be difficult to tell whether the answer is truthful. A plausible lie can resemble a truthful answer when judged in isolation. Asking multiple questions already improves the situation because inconsistencies begin to accumulate. But the strongest setting is a sequential interrogation in which each new question is conditioned on the previous answer. In that setting, truthful answers tend to remain coherent under follow-up, whereas fabricated answers become progressively harder to sustain. What matters is not merely one answer, but the consistency and quality of the evolving dialogue.\n\n% We argue that black-box auditing of generative models should be viewed in the same way. In this analogy, the suspect is the generative model. A classical MIA effectively asks a single question: \\emph{did you see this example during training?} A DI broadens the scope by asking multiple questions about whether a dataset, concept collection, or benchmark was present in training. Our approach goes one step further: instead of evaluating isolated outputs, we construct a chained interaction in which each generation informs the next query. For images, this takes the form of iterative regenerations; for audio, echo-style continuation and reconditioning; and for language, text expansion and continuation. The resulting sequence exposes not only whether the model can produce a plausible output once, but whether it can sustain a coherent chain of outputs whose quality differs systematically between members and non-members.\n\n% This perspective leads to \\textbf{MADreMIA}, a generative framework inspired by Model Autophagy Disorder (MAD). The core idea is simple: if a sample was seen during training, then repeatedly feeding model-produced outputs back into the generation process should preserve, amplify, or reveal traces of membership more strongly than standard one-shot querying. In contrast, for non-members, the same chained process tends to drift, degrade, or lose the latent structure associated with memorized data in much faster pace. By measuring these differences over chained regenerations rather than isolated generations, we obtain stronger evidence for both membership inference and dataset inference.\n\n% Our formulation is deliberately modality-agnostic. The mechanism of chaining differs across domains, but the underlying principle is shared: membership leaves traces in the stability, fidelity, and self-consistency of iterated generation. This allows the same high-level auditing idea to transfer across image autoregressive models, diffusion models, large language models, and large audio-language models. Beyond improving attack strength, this viewpoint also helps unify several practical audit settings -- privacy auditing, contamination detection, and unlearning evaluation -- under a single sequential black-box framework.\n\n% In summary, this paper asks whether one-shot auditing underuses the information already available from generative models. Our answer is \\textbf{yes}: a single output is often too weak to be decisive, but a sequence of conditionally linked outputs can reveal much richer evidence. We develop this idea systematically and show that chained regenerated outputs provide a more sensitive and robust signal for distinguishing members from non-members across diverse generative architectures and modalities.\n\n% \\begin{figure*}[t]\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=0.98\\textwidth]{figures/teaser.png}\n% \\caption{Comparison between conventional one-shot membership inference (Case A) and our chained-generation approach (Case B). In Case A, a single query yields a weak signal that often fails to separate members from non-members. In Case B, each generation informs the next query, progressively amplifying membership evidence and improving separability.}\n% \\label{fig:teaser}\n% \\end{figure*}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: content/02_related.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Related Works}\n\n\\paragraph{Memorization.} Memorization in generative models — the tendency to reproduce training examples rather than generate novel samples — has been studied across multiple model families. Early work formalized the distinction between memorization, mode collapse, and overfitting~\\citep{burg2021memorization1}, while subsequent studies characterized the generalization-to-memorization transition in diffusion models~\\citep{gu2023memorization4}, localized it through attention patterns~\\citep{sakarvadia2024memorization3}, and showed that standard evaluation metrics fail to surface it~\\citep{bai2021memorization2}. Mitigation strategies have been proposed for both LLMs~\\citep{hans2024memorization5} and text-to-image models~\\citep{Chen2025memorization7}.\n\\vspace{-0.1cm}\n\\paragraph{Membership and Dataset Inference.} Individual Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) can be confounded by distribution shifts~\\citep{maini2024did}, prompting a shift toward Dataset Inference, which aggregates evidence across many samples~\\citep{maini2025reassessing,dubinski2025cdi,kowalczuk2025privacy}. Shadow-model approaches~\\citep{ye2022enhanced,carlini2021zlib} are now computationally infeasible for large architectures, so modern attacks extract signals from limited black-box outputs~\\citep{zhang2024minkpp,chang2025camia,tao2025informia}. Most relevant to our work, \\citet{li2024towards} performs MIAs on diffusion models by repeatedly perturbing a target image and comparing averaged outputs to the original — but since queries are independent and do not evolve with model responses, deeper structural memorization remains unexploited.\n\\vspace{-0.1cm}\n\\paragraph{Model Collapse.} Recursive self-training in generative models leads to progressive quality and diversity degradation when insufficient real data is injected — a phenomenon termed Model Autophagy Disorder~\\citep{alemohammad2023mad}. Training on model-generated data further causes tails of the original distribution to disappear~\\citep{shumailov2024mad2}. Together, these works suggest that iterative generation is structurally revealing: memorized regions may persist differently from non-member examples under repeated reuse. Our method turns this insight into a privacy-auditing mechanism, \\textbf{exploiting chained regeneration at inference time} to amplify membership-relevant differences rather than treating collapse as a training-time pathology. The extended related works section can be found in Appendix~\\ref{app:related}.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: content/03_method.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Method}\n\\label{sec:madremia-method}\n\nMADreMIA is a trajectory-augmentation framework for privacy inference on generative models. It is designed as an any-box extension of standard one-shot attacks (MIA/DI): black-box by default, gray-box when richer outputs are available, and white-box when needed. The central design principle is to keep the downstream scorer unchanged and improve only its input representation through additional trajectory-derived evidence.\n\n\\paragraph{Unified setup.}\nFollowing Sec.~\\ref{sec:general-theory}, for each queried sample we construct\n\\[\nZ_0, Z_1, \\dots, Z_T,\\qquad\nZ_{t+1}=\\mathcal{R}(f, Z_t),\\; t=0,\\dots,T-1,\n\\]\nwhere $Z_0=x$ is the queried sample, $f$ is the audited generator, and $\\mathcal{R}$ is a modality-specific regeneration operator executed under a fixed protocol. For MIA, the label is $M\\in\\{0,1\\}$ (member/non-member). For DI, we use an analogous binary label $D\\in\\{0,1\\}$ (in-target-dataset/out-of-target-dataset).\n\n% \\paragraph{Unified setup.}\n% Following Sec.~\\ref{sec:general-theory}, for each queried sample we construct\n% \\[\n% Z_0, Z_1, \\dots, Z_T,\\qquad\n% Z_{t+1}=\\mathcal{R}(f, Z_t),\\; t=0,\\dots,T-1,\n% \\]\n% where $Z_0=x$ is the queried sample, $f$ is the audited generator, and $\\mathcal{R}$ is a modality-specific regeneration operator executed under a fixed protocol. For MIA, the label is $M\\in\\{0,1\\}$ (member/non-member). For DI, we use an analogous binary label $D\\in\\{0,1\\}$ (in-target-dataset/out-of-target-dataset).\n\n\\paragraph{Threat model.}\nMADreMIA supports: black-box (query access to $f$ outputs only), gray-box (query access plus output-level statistics such as loss/log-probability signals), and white-box (optional access to internals/gradients when available). In all cases, the adversary/auditor has no access to training data identities (labels), performs at most $T$ regeneration steps per sample, and outputs a binary prediction via $h$: $M$ for MIA or $D$ for DI.\n\n\\paragraph{Base one-shot signal.}\nThe theory defines\n$\\phi_t := \\phi(Z_t, Z_{t+1}),\\qquad\nS_T := \\frac{1}{T}\\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\\phi_t.$\n\n\nA trajectory one-shot comparator corresponds to the $T=1$ case (using $\\phi_0=\\phi(Z_0,Z_1)$). When available, we additionally report classical one-shot baselines $z_{\\mathrm{base}}=\\phi_{\\mathrm{base}}(Z_0)$. Importantly, for each modality/model, the orientation (sign) of $\\phi_t$ is fixed on train data only (equivalently $\\phi_t$ or $-\\phi_t$) and then frozen for test-time evaluation.\n\n% \\todo{czy da sie to lepiej napisac?}\n% We report $S_T$-based univariate attacks as the direct theory-facing statistic and multivariate fusion as a secondary enhancement.\n\\paragraph{Signals and Fusion.} MADreMIA augments one-shot evidence with trajectory summaries computed from $(Z_0,\\dots,Z_T)$. We define\n\\[\nz_{\\mathrm{base}}=\\phi_{\\mathrm{base}}(Z_0)\\in\\mathbb{R}^{d},\\qquad\nz_{\\mathrm{traj}}=\\psi(Z_0,\\dots,Z_T)\\in\\mathbb{R}^{k},\n\\]\nHere $\\psi$ aggregates temporal statistics aligned with the $\\phi_t$ process (e.g., drift, consistency, quality evolution, diversity, score decay, and summaries derived from $\\{\\phi_t\\}_{t=0}^{T-1}$ and $S_T$). The fused representation is $\\tilde z=[z_{\\mathrm{base}}\\|z_{\\mathrm{traj}}]\\in\\mathbb{R}^{d+k},$\nand the final attack score is $ s(Z_0)=h(\\tilde z), $\nwith $h$ a calibrated scorer. By default, following~\\citet{kowalczuk2025privacy}, $h$ is an L1-regularized logistic regression fit as a plug-in estimator of $P(M=1\\mid \\tilde z)$.\n%\\todo{Reproducibility: give full list of psi statistics per modality, dimensionality k, the z\\_base z\\_traj layout, the L1 strength, and threshold-selection rule for h.}\n\n\\paragraph{Mechanism.} MADreMIA leverages the fact that members often exhibit slower average drift than non-members. Memorized samples typically lie in deeper local probability wells, causing iterative regenerations to remain closer to $Z_0$. Gains represent fixed-statistic SNR improvements consistent with the DPI: $I(M;\\tilde z)\\le I(M;Z_0)$. \n\n% \\paragraph{MADreMIA trajectory membership signal amplifier.}\n% MADreMIA augments one-shot evidence with trajectory summaries computed from $(Z_0,\\dots,Z_T)$. We define\n% \\[\n% z_{\\mathrm{base}}=\\phi_{\\mathrm{base}}(Z_0)\\in\\mathbb{R}^{d},\\qquad\n% z_{\\mathrm{traj}}=\\psi(Z_0,\\dots,Z_T)\\in\\mathbb{R}^{k},\n% \\]\n% Here $\\psi$ aggregates temporal statistics aligned with the $\\phi_t$ process (e.g., drift, consistency, quality evolution, diversity, score decay, and summaries derived from $\\{\\phi_t\\}_{t=0}^{T-1}$ and $S_T$). The fused representation is\n% \\[\n% \\tilde z=[z_{\\mathrm{base}}\\|z_{\\mathrm{traj}}]\\in\\mathbb{R}^{d+k},\n% \\]\n% and the final attack score is\n% \\[\n% s(Z_0)=h(\\tilde z),\n% \\]\n% with $h$ a calibrated scorer. In our default setup, following~\\citet{kowalczuk2025privacy}, $h$ is L1-regularized logistic regression with train-only normalization and train-only threshold selection. Here $h$ is fit as a plug-in estimator of $P(M=1\\mid \\tilde z)$ (or $P(D=1\\mid \\tilde z)$ for DI) within the chosen model class. MADreMIA therefore modifies the representation, not the scoring principle.\n\n% \\paragraph{Mechanism.}\n% One-shot evidence ($T=1$) is often weakly separable. MADreMIA improves practical separability by aggregating temporal evidence over $t=0,\\dots,T-1$: in evaluated settings, members (or in-dataset samples) exhibit slower average drift than non-members (or out-dataset samples). Intuitively, memorized samples lie in stronger local probability wells of the learned distribution, so iterative regeneration tends to remain closer to their neighborhood, whereas non-members drift more rapidly. This is the empirical counterpart of trajectory averaging and SNR amplification formalized via $\\phi_t$ and $S_T$ in Sec.~\\ref{sec:general-theory}. Consistent with the Bayes-cap remark in theory, gains are interpreted as fixed-statistic SNR/variance gains rather than increased Bayes-optimal information. Under the Markov structure $M\\!\\to\\!Z_0\\!\\to\\!Z_1\\!\\to\\!\\cdots\\!\\to\\!Z_T$, this is DPI-consistent: $I(M;\\tilde z)\\le I(M;Z_0)$.\n\n\\subsection{Modality-specific instantiations}\n\\label{sec:madremia-modalities}\n%\\todo{Specify R exactly: diffusion noise level + scheduler + #steps; precise definition of IAR strength s; LLM prompt template + decoding params.}\n\n\\paragraph{Image autoregressive models (IARs) and diffusion models.}\n$\\mathcal{R}$ is image-to-image regeneration under fixed controls (autoregressive decoding for IARs; controlled re-noise/re-denoise for diffusion, i.e., partial forward noising to a fixed noise level followed by reverse denoising under fixed scheduler/settings). Trajectory features are defined relative to $Z_0$, in particular\n$\\mathrm{MSE}(Z_0,Z_t)$, $\\mathrm{LPIPS}(Z_0,Z_t)$~\\cite{zhang2018lpips}, and $\\mathrm{SSIM}(Z_0,Z_t)$~\\cite{wang2004ssim}.\n\n\\paragraph{Large language models (LLMs).}\n$\\mathcal{R}$ is an autophagous text loop where each generation is fed back as the next prompt/input under a fixed template, fixed context-window policy (with left-sided truncation to keep only the newest text), and fixed decoding configuration. We use multiple features to measure the quality and diversity of generations, specifically: Kullback-Leibler Divergence, Jensen-Shannon Divergence, Jaccard Index, Predictive Entropy, and Logit Margin:\n\\[\n\\mathrm{KLD}(Z_0,Z_t),\\quad\n\\mathrm{JSD}(Z_0,Z_t),\\quad\n\\mathrm{Jaccard}(Z_0,Z_t), \\quad\n\\mathrm{Entropy}(Z_t),\\quad\n\\mathrm{LogitMargin}(Z_t),\n\\]\nfor $t\\in\\{1,\\dots,T\\}$. These are summarized along the trajectory and fused with $z_{\\mathrm{base}}$.\nFor clarity, KLD/JSD are computed on aligned token-distribution vectors: in gray/white-box settings from next-token logits, and in black-box settings from smoothed empirical token-frequency distributions under a fixed tokenizer/vocabulary. In fact, metrics in our experiments follow the gray-box setting, but our framework itself \\textbf{is open to the black-box setting as well}. A black-box setting requires repeated queries per step to estimate distributions. Jaccard is computed on token sets after the same fixed preprocessing. More information about features for vision and language models are provided in Appendix~\\ref{app:metrics}.\n\n\\paragraph{Audio generative models.}\nIn the audio domain, $\\mathcal{R}$ employs iterative reconstruction loops. Notably, we do not conduct a full Membership or Dataset Inference evaluation for audio models, as the literature currently lacks proper audio benchmarks and specialized attacks tailored to the voice conversion setting. Nevertheless, to demonstrate the cross-modal generality of our framework, our first experiment explores this potential using an objective audio fidelity metric.\n\nAcross all modalities, MADreMIA follows the pipeline: $Z_0 \\rightarrow (Z_{0:T}) \\rightarrow (\\phi_{0:T-1}, S_T, z_{\\mathrm{traj}}) \\rightarrow \\tilde z \\rightarrow s(Z_0)$.\n% Across modalities, MADreMIA always follows\n% \\[\n% Z_0 \\rightarrow (Z_0,\\dots,Z_T) \\rightarrow (\\phi_{0:T-1}, S_T, z_{\\mathrm{traj}}) \\rightarrow \\tilde z \\rightarrow s(Z_0),\n% \\]\n% This defines a more general abstraction with modality-specific feature definitions ( $\\psi$).\n\n% \\section{Method}\n% \\janek{We don't really explain the method clearly. There is no formal resolution (if X then member) etc. Feels like defining a couple of formalisms, not actually method description.}\n\n% MADreMIA is a lightweight add-on to standard membership and dataset inference tasks (see Figure~\\ref{fig:method}). In this section, we present it only as MIA add-on for simplicity. A one-shot MIA extracts features from a query sample and predicts a membership score, but this signal is often weak. We strengthen it by concatenating features from an iterative regeneration trajectory before calculating final MIA score.\n\n% \\paragraph{Base MIA embedding.}\n% Given an input \\(x\\), a baseline extractor \\(\\phi_{\\text{mia}}\\) produces\n% $\n% z_{\\text{mia}}=\\phi_{\\text{mia}}(x)\\in\\mathbb{R}^{d}.\n% $\n% This is the standard one-shot MIA representation.\n\n\n% \\paragraph{Chained regeneration.}\n% We construct a self-conditioned sequence\n% \\[\n% x^{(t+1)}=\\mathcal{R}(f,x^{(t)}),\\quad x^{(0)}=x,\\; t=0,\\ldots,T-1,\n% \\]\n% where \\(f\\) is the target generator and \\(\\mathcal{R}\\) is modality-specific regeneration (e.g., image regeneration, text continuation, audio echo). \n% Two key observations on re- members and non-members are: \n% \\begin{enumerate}\n% \\item generation's quality: re-members have higher quality throuhgout the trajectory; non-members generations degrade faster,\n% \\item generation's diversity: re-members tend to preserve structure across steps, are more coherent; non-members generations diverge in distinct directions faster, are more diverse.\n% \\end{enumerate}\n% We formalize our approach as a self-conditioned sequence:\n% \\[\n% x^{(t+1)}=\\mathcal{R}(f,x^{(t)}),\\quad x^{(0)}=x,\\; t=0,\\ldots,T-1,\n% \\]\n% where $f$ denotes the target generator and $\\mathcal{R}$ represents a modality-specific regeneration function (e.g., image-to-image refinement, text continuation, or audio re-conditioning). Intuitively, if \\(x\\) is a training member, the model preserves structure and identity across generation trajectory more consistently; for non-members, the chain drifts faster and degrades in fidelity.\n\n% \\paragraph{Feature fusion and scoring.}\n% Trajectory statistics are encoded as $z_{\\text{traj}}=\\psi(x^{(0)},\\ldots,x^{(T)})\\in\\mathbb{R}^{k},$ and then concatenated with baseline evidence:\n% $\\tilde{z}=[z_{\\text{mia}}\\|\\;z_{\\text{traj}}]. $\n% A scorer \\(h\\) outputs the final membership score \\(s(x)=h(\\tilde{z})\\). The scoring stage is unchanged; MADreMIA only enriches the input representation.\n\n% \\paragraph{Key effect.}\n% MADreMIA converts weak one-shot evidence into a stronger temporal-consistency signal, improving member/non-member separability while remaining model- and modality-agnostic.\n\n% \\begin{figure}[t!]\n% \\centering\n\n% % ===================== TOP ROW =====================\n% % -------- Vision block (left) --------\n% \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.48\\textwidth}\n% \\begin{minipage}[c]{0.10\\textwidth}\n% \\rotatebox{90}{\\subtitleboxblack{\\textbf{Images}\\hspace{0.5em}\\emph{(black-box)}}}\n% \\end{minipage}\n% \\begin{minipage}[c]{0.88\\textwidth}\n% \\centering\n% % Row 1\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/rar_xxl.pdf}\n% \\caption{RAR-XXL}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/var_30.pdf}\n% \\caption{VAR-d30}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n\n% \\vspace{0.4em}\n\n% % Row 2\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/dit_g.pdf}\n% \\caption{DiT-MoE-G}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/uvit_t2i_deep.pdf}\n% \\caption{UViT-T2I-Deep}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\end{minipage}\n% \\end{minipage}\n% \\hfill\n% % -------- Text block (right) --------\n% \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.48\\textwidth}\n% \\begin{minipage}[c]{0.10\\textwidth}\n% \\rotatebox{90}{\\subtitlebox{\\textbf{Text}\\hspace{0.5em}\\emph{(grey-box)}}}\n% \\end{minipage}\n% \\begin{minipage}[c]{0.88\\textwidth}\n% \\centering\n% % Row 1\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/olmo_7b_new.pdf}\n% \\caption{OLMo-7B}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/pythia_6_9b_new.pdf}\n% \\caption{Pythia-6.9B}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n\n% \\vspace{0.4em}\n\n% % Row 2\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/opt_6b_new.pdf}\n% \\caption{OPT-6.7B}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/llama_new.pdf}\n% \\caption{Llama-13B}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\end{minipage}\n% \\end{minipage}\n\n% \\vspace{4mm}\n\n% % ===================== BOTTOM ROW =====================\n% % -------- Audio block (under vision only) --------\n% \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.48\\textwidth}\n% \\begin{minipage}[c]{0.10\\textwidth}\n% \\rotatebox{90}{\\subtitleboxblack{\\textbf{Audio}\\hspace{0.5em}\\emph{(black-box)}}}\n% \\end{minipage}\n% \\begin{minipage}[c]{0.88\\textwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/freevc.pdf}\n% \\caption{FreeVC}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/autovc.pdf}\n% \\caption{AutoVC}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\end{minipage}\n% \\end{minipage}\n% \\caption{\\textbf{Divergence trajectories across chained regeneration steps.} Rows represent image models (FID), audio models (FAD), and language models (KLD). Across modalities and access settings, \\colorbox{okFill}{member examples} retain lower divergence and degrade more slowly than \\colorbox{badFill}{non-member examples}, providing a robust signal for both membership and dataset inference. Evaluations were conducted using the following sample sizes: 10,000 for IAR and Diffusion models, 2,000 for Audio, 1,000 for OLMo, 512 for Pythia, and 250 for LLaMA and OPT (complete WikiMIA dataset).}\n% \\label{fig:fid-proof}\n% \\vspace{-0.4cm}\n% \\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t!]\n\\centering\n\\begin{minipage}[t]{0.36\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\subtitleboxblack{\\textbf{Images}\\hspace{0.5em}\\emph{(black-box)}}\n \\vspace{0.3em}\n\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/rar_xxl.pdf}\n \\caption{RAR-XXL}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/var_30.pdf}\n \\caption{VAR-d30}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\vspace{0.3em}\n\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/dit_g.pdf}\n \\caption{DiT-MoE-G}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/uvit_t2i_deep.pdf}\n \\caption{UViT-T2I-Deep}\n \\end{subfigure}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\hfill\n\\begin{minipage}[t]{0.36\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\subtitlebox{\\textbf{Text}\\hspace{0.5em}\\emph{(grey-box)}}\n \\vspace{0.3em}\n\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/olmo_7b_new.pdf}\n \\caption{OLMo-7B}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/pythia_6_9b_new.pdf}\n \\caption{Pythia-6.9B}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\vspace{0.3em}\n\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/opt_6b_new.pdf}\n \\caption{OPT-6.7B}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/llama_new.pdf}\n \\caption{Llama-13B}\n \\end{subfigure}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\hfill\n\\begin{minipage}[t]{0.24\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\subtitleboxblack{\\textbf{Audio}\\hspace{0.3em}\\emph{(black-box)}}\n \\vspace{0.5em}\n \n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.7\\linewidth}\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/freevc.pdf}\n \\caption{FreeVC}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\vspace{1.4em}\n \n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.7\\linewidth}\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/autovc.pdf}\n \\caption{AutoVC}\n \\end{subfigure}\n\\end{minipage}\n\n\\caption{\\textbf{Divergence trajectories across chained regeneration steps.} Rows represent image models (FID), audio models (FAD), and language models (KLD). Across modalities and access settings, \\colorbox{okFill}{member examples} retain lower divergence and degrade more slowly than \\colorbox{badFill}{non-member examples}, providing a robust signal for both membership and dataset inference. Evaluations were conducted using the following sample sizes: 10,000 for IAR and Diffusion models, 2,000 for Audio, 1,000 for OLMo, 512 for Pythia, and 250 for Llama and OPT.}\n\\label{fig:fid-proof}\n\\vspace{-0.4cm}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n% \\subsection{MIA procedure}\n% \\textbf{LLMy:}\\\\\n% We propose an iterative Membership Inference Attack (MIA) framework operating under a grey-box threat model to distinguish memorized training data from unseen non-members. To capture the differential dynamics of memorization, we force the target Large Language Model into an autophagous generative loop—feeding its output back as the input prompt across $N$ iterations—to extract continuous sequence trajectories. At each iteration, we compute a comprehensive suite of established MIA baselines~\\citep{carlini2021zlib,zhang2024minkpp,chang2025camia}\\todo{CITE Loss also}, quality metrics, and diversity metrics (metrics are described in~\\Cref{}\\todo{REF}) that quantify how drastically the model's structural and probabilistic output deviates from its initial state. To evaluate the discriminatory power of these features, we employ a bootstrap. Individual trajectory statistics (such as maximum drift or mean entropy) are evaluated directly via distribution thresholding, while multidimensional feature ensembles are fused using a Logistic Regression classifier evaluated on strictly stratified 80/20 train-test splits to prevent data leakage. Final attack efficacy is reported utilizing the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC), True Positive Rate at a strict 1\\% False Positive Rate, and overall classification accuracy.\n\n% \\textbf{IARy:}\\\\\n% To capture the differential dynamics of memorization, we force the target model into an autophagous generative loop, using its own output as the subsequent prompt across $N$ iterations to extract continuous generation trajectories. At each step, we compute an established MIA baseline~\\citep{}\\todo{CITE}, Quality and Diversity metrics that quantify how drastically the model's structural and probabilistic output deviates from the initial image. To rigorously evaluate these trajectories, we employ a bootstrapping methodology. Individual feature statistics are evaluated directly via distribution thresholding, while multidimensional feature ensembles are fused using a Logistic Regression classifier trained on strictly stratified 80/20 splits to prevent data leakage. Attack efficacy is reported using the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC), True Positive Rate at a strict 1\\% False Positive Rate, and threshold classification accuracy.\n\n\n% \\begin{figure}[t!]\n% \\centering\n% \\begin{minipage}[c]{0.05\\textwidth}\n% \\rotatebox{90}{\\subtitleboxblack{\\textbf{Images} \\hspace{0.5em} \\emph{(black-box)}}}\n% \\end{minipage}\n% \\begin{minipage}[c]{0.4\\textwidth}\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\textwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/rar_xxl.pdf}\n% \\caption{RAR-XXL}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\textwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/var_30.pdf}\n% \\caption{VAR-d30}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\textwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/dit_g.pdf}\n% \\caption{DiT-MoE-G}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\textwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/uvit_t2i_deep.pdf}\n% \\caption{UViT-T2I-Deep}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\end{minipage}\n \n% \\vspace{3mm}\n% \\begin{minipage}[c]{0.05\\textwidth}\n% \\rotatebox{90}{\\subtitleboxblack{ \\textbf{Audio} \\hspace{0.5em} \\emph{(black-box)}}}\n% \\end{minipage}\n% \\begin{minipage}[c]{0.4\\textwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\textwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/freevc.pdf}\n% \\caption{FreeVC}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\textwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/autovc.pdf}\n% \\caption{AutoVC}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\end{minipage}\n\n% \\vspace{3mm}\n% \\begin{minipage}[c]{0.05\\textwidth}\n% \\rotatebox{90}{\\subtitlebox{\\textbf{Text} \\hspace{0.5em} \\emph{(grey-box)}}}\n% \\end{minipage}\n% \\begin{minipage}[c]{0.4\\textwidth}\n% \\centering\n% % Row 1\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/olmo_7b.pdf}\n% \\caption{OLMo-7B}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/gpt_neo_20b.pdf}\n% \\caption{GPT-NeoX-20B}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n \n% \\vspace{0.2em}\n \n% % Row 2\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/mamba.pdf}\n% \\caption{Mamba-1.4B}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\linewidth}\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/llama.pdf}\n% \\caption{Llama-13B}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\end{minipage}\n % \\rotatebox{90}{\\subtitlebox{\\textbf{Text} \\hspace{0.5em} \\emph{(grey-box setting)}}}\n % \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.22\\textwidth}\n % \\centering\n % \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/olmo_7b.pdf}\n % \\caption{OLMo 7B}\n % \\end{subfigure}\n % \\hfill\n % \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.22\\textwidth}\n % \\centering\n % \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/gpt_neo_20b.pdf}\n % \\caption{GPT-NeoX-20B}\n % \\end{subfigure}\n % \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.22\\textwidth}\n % \\centering\n % \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/mamba.pdf}\n % \\caption{Mamba-1.4B}\n % \\end{subfigure}\n % \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.22\\textwidth}\n % \\centering\n % \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/llama.pdf}\n % \\caption{Llama-13B}\n % \\end{subfigure}\n\n% \\caption{\\textbf{Divergence trajectories across chained regeneration steps.} Rows represent image models ($FID$), audio models ($FAD$), and text models ($KLD$). Across modalities and access settings, \\colorbox{okFill}{member examples} retain lower divergence and degrade more slowly than \\colorbox{badFill}{non-member examples}, providing a robust signal for both membership and dataset inference.}\n% \\label{fig:fid-proof}\n% \\vspace{-0.4cm}\n% \\end{figure}\n\n\n\n\n%In summary, this paper asks whether current one-shot auditing protocols leave critical evidence on the table. Our answer is a definitive yes: if a single generation is merely a \"statement,\" then a conditionally linked sequence is a \"testimony.\" We systematically show that by moving beyond isolated queries to a chained-generation framework, we can amplify the subtle signals of memorization that one-shot methods miss. Our approach, MADreMIA, provides a significantly more sensitive and robust signal for membership—proving that the model's ability to sustain coherence over time is the most reliable evidence for its training provenance across all modalities.\n\n%In summary, this paper asks whether one-shot auditing underuses the information already available from generative models. Our answer is \\textbf{yes}: a single output is often too weak to be decisive, but a sequence of conditionally linked outputs can reveal much richer evidence. We develop this idea systematically and show that chained regenerated outputs provide a more sensitive and robust signal for distinguishing members from non-members across diverse generative architectures and modalities.\n\n================================================\nFILE: content/04_theory.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Theory of Trajectory-Based Signal Amplification}\n\\label{sec:general-theory}\n\nFor each sample, we define an iterative trajectory $Z_0, Z_1, \\dots, Z_T$, where $Z_0$ is the observed sample and $Z_{t+1}$ is produced by one regeneration step. Let $M \\in \\{0,1\\}$ denote membership. Define a per-step score $\\phi_t := \\phi(Z_t, Z_{t+1})$ and the average $S_T := \\frac{1}{T}\\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\\phi_t$. The attack predicts $M$ from $S_T$. We use $a_T \\gtrsim b_T$ when $a_T \\ge c\\,b_T$ for a constant $c > 0$ independent of $T$, and $a_T \\asymp b_T$ for two-sided bounds.\n\n\\begin{assumption}[Signal and Noise]\n\\label{assumptions}\n(A1) There exists a sequence $(\\Delta_t \\ge 0)$ such that $\\E[\\phi_t \\mid M=1] - \\E[\\phi_t \\mid M=0] \\ge \\Delta_t$. (A2) $\\max_m \\sup_t \\Var(\\phi_t \\mid M=m) \\le \\sigma^2 < \\infty$. (A3) The centered process $\\tilde{\\phi}_t := \\phi_t - \\E[\\phi_t \\mid M]$ is geometrically mixing with effective autocorrelation time $\\tau_{\\mathrm{eff}}$, implying $\\Var(S_T \\mid M) \\le C\\frac{\\sigma^2\\tau_{\\mathrm{eff}}}{T}$.\n\\end{assumption}\n\n\\begin{theorem}[Trajectory Averaging]\n\\label{thm:trajectory-amplification}\nUnder A1--A3, the signal $\\Gamma_T := |\\E[S_T \\mid M=1] - \\E[S_T \\mid M=0]|$ and SNR satisfy:\n\\[\n\\Gamma_T \\ge \\frac{1}{T}\\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\\Delta_t, \\quad \\mathrm{SNR}^2(S_T) := \\frac{\\Gamma_T^2}{\\max_m \\Var(S_T \\mid M=m)} \\ge \\frac{(\\frac{1}{T}\\sum \\Delta_t)^2}{C\\sigma^2\\tau_{\\mathrm{eff}}/T}.\n\\]\n\\end{theorem}\n\\textit{Interpretation.} Multi-step attacks improve when mean signal decays slowly relative to variance reduction. \n\n\\begin{corollary}[Exponential Leakage]\n\\label{cor:exp-leakage}\nIf $\\Delta_t = \\Delta_0 e^{-t/\\tau_g}$, then $\\Gamma_T \\ge \\Delta_0\\frac{1-e^{-T/\\tau_g}}{T/\\tau_g}$. If $\\Gamma_T \\asymp \\Delta_0\\frac{1-e^{-T/\\tau_g}}{T/\\tau_g}$, then $\\mathrm{SNR}^2(S_T)\\gtrsim g(T/\\tau_g)$ where $g(x):=\\frac{(1-e^{-x})^2}{x}$. The maximizer $x^\\star \\approx 1.2564$ yields an optimal $T^\\star \\approx 1.2564\\,\\tau_g$.\n\\end{corollary}\n\n\\begin{corollary}[Amplification Gain]\n\\label{cor:sqrt-kappa}\nLet $\\kappa := \\tau_g/\\tau_{\\mathrm{eff}}$. At $T=T^\\star$, the gain over the single-step baseline $S_1$ is $\\frac{\\mathrm{SNR}(S_{T^\\star})}{\\mathrm{SNR}(S_1)} \\gtrsim c\\sqrt{\\kappa}$, with $c \\approx 0.638$.\n\\end{corollary}\n\nIt is worth noting that we do not claim that trajectory iteration increase the Bayes information ceiling $I(M; Z_0)$; No, instead it improves practical fixed-form statistics via temporal variance reduction.\n\nThis theory applies to any iterative protocol satisfying A1--A3. Theorem~\\ref{thm:trajectory-amplification} provides a conditional amplification guarantee. We present proofs in the Appendix~\\ref{app:proofs-general-theory}.\n\n% \\section{Method}\n% \\label{sec:madremia-method}\n\n% MADreMIA is an any-box trajectory-augmentation framework for privacy inference. It improves downstream scorers by enhancing the input representation with trajectory-derived evidence.\n\n% \\paragraph{Unified setup.}\n% Following Sec.~\\ref{sec:general-theory}, for each queried sample we construct\n% \\[\n% Z_0, Z_1, \\dots, Z_T,\\qquad\n% Z_{t+1}=\\mathcal{R}(f, Z_t),\\; t=0,\\dots,T-1,\n% \\]\n% where $Z_0=x$ is the queried sample, $f$ is the audited generator, and $\\mathcal{R}$ is a modality-specific regeneration operator executed under a fixed protocol. For MIA, the label is $M\\in\\{0,1\\}$ (member/non-member). For DI, we use an analogous binary label $D\\in\\{0,1\\}$ (in-target-dataset/out-of-target-dataset).\n\n% \\paragraph{Threat model.}\n% MADreMIA supports: black-box (query access to $f$ outputs only), gray-box (query access plus output-level statistics such as loss/log-probability signals), and white-box (optional access to internals/gradients when available). In all cases, the adversary/auditor has no access to training data identities (labels), performs at most $T$ regeneration steps per sample, and outputs a binary prediction via $h$: $M$ for MIA or $D$ for DI.\n\n% % \\paragraph{Unified setup.} For a queried sample $Z_0$, we construct $Z_{t+1}=\\mathcal{R}(f, Z_t)$ for $t < T$, where $f$ is the generator and $\\mathcal{R}$ is a modality-specific regeneration operator. We consider binary labels $M$ (MIA) or $D$ (DI).\n% % MADreMIA supports black-box (outputs only), gray-box (output statistics), and white-box (internals) access. The auditor performs at most $T$ steps and outputs a prediction $h(\\tilde{z})$.\n\n% \\paragraph{Signals and Fusion.} We define the baseline $z_{\\mathrm{base}}=\\phi_{\\mathrm{base}}(Z_0)$ and trajectory features $z_{\\mathrm{traj}}=\\psi(Z_0,\\dots,Z_T)$, where $\\psi$ aggregates statistics like drift, consistency, and the average score $S_T$. The fused representation $\\tilde z=[z_{\\mathrm{base}}\\|z_{\\mathrm{traj}}]$ is fed to a calibrated scorer $s(Z_0)=h(\\tilde z)$. By default, $h$ is an L1-regularized logistic regression fit as a plug-in estimator of $P(M=1\\mid \\tilde z)$.\n\n% \\paragraph{Mechanism.} MADreMIA leverages the fact that members often exhibit slower average drift than non-members. Memorized samples typically lie in deeper local probability wells, causing iterative regenerations to remain closer to $Z_0$. Gains represent fixed-statistic SNR improvements consistent with the DPI: $I(M;\\tilde z)\\le I(M;Z_0)$.\n\n% \\subsection{Modality-specific instantiations}\n% \\label{sec:madremia-modalities}\n\n% \\paragraph{Image autoregressive models (IARs) and diffusion models.}\n% $\\mathcal{R}$ is image-to-image regeneration under fixed controls (autoregressive decoding for IARs; controlled re-noise/re-denoise for diffusion, i.e., partial forward noising to a fixed noise level followed by reverse denoising under fixed scheduler/settings). Trajectory features are defined relative to $Z_0$, in particular\n% $\\mathrm{MSE}(Z_0,Z_t)$, $\\mathrm{LPIPS}(Z_0,Z_t)$~\\cite{zhang2018lpips}, and $\\mathrm{SSIM}(Z_0,Z_t)$~\\cite{wang2004ssim}.\n% % \\paragraph{Images (IARs and Diffusion).} $\\mathcal{R}$ is image-to-image regeneration (autoregressive decoding or controlled re-noise/denoise). Features include $\\mathrm{MSE}(Z_0,Z_t)$, $\\mathrm{LPIPS}(Z_0,Z_t)$, and $\\mathrm{SSIM}(Z_0,Z_t)$.\n\n% \\paragraph{LLMs.} $\\mathcal{R}$ is an autophagous loop with fixed templates and left-sided truncation. We aggregate $\\mathrm{KLD}(Z_0,Z_t)$, $\\mathrm{JSD}(Z_0,Z_t)$, $\\mathrm{Jaccard}(Z_0,Z_t)$, $\\mathrm{Entropy}(Z_t)$, and $\\mathrm{LogitMargin}(Z_t)$. KLD/JSD use next-token logits (gray-box) or empirical frequencies (black-box). \n\n% \\paragraph{Audio.} $\\mathcal{R}$ uses iterative reconstruction. While standard benchmarks are lacking, we evaluate this to demonstrate cross-modal generality using audio fidelity metrics.\n\n% \\paragraph{Abstraction.} Across all modalities, MADreMIA follows the pipeline: $Z_0 \\rightarrow (Z_{0:T}) \\rightarrow (\\phi_{0:T-1}, S_T, z_{\\mathrm{traj}}) \\rightarrow \\tilde z \\rightarrow s(Z_0)$.\n\n\n\n\n\n% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% \\clearpage\n% \\begin{itemize}\n% \\item The Inevitability of the \"Absorbing State\" The \"Model Collapse\" paper mathematically models this generational decay as a Markov chain. It shows that even under nearly ideal learning conditions (where functional approximation errors are minimal), a recursive loop will inevitably hit an \"absorbing state\". This means the probability distribution eventually converges into a \"delta function\"—a single point estimate with zero variance. - My to mocno potwierdzamy, bo IN i COCO to generalnie \"healty\" datasety a kolaps w inferencji występuje.\n% \\item MAD paper says that one of the main motivations for using synthetic data is to protect privacy in sensitive applications, such as medical imaging or medical record aggregation. The MAD paper observes that during an autophagous loop with sampling bias, the generated data modes do not blur together, but rather \"drift and collapse around individual (high quality) images\". If those individual images that the model collapses onto are exact matches of the original training data, the model is acting as a leaky database. \\todo{Czy autophagous loop na obrazie syntetycznym doprowadzi do danych rzeczywistych z trainsetu?}\n% \\end{itemize}\n\n% \\todo{JUST EXAMPLES:}\n\n% \\begin{theorem}\\label{theo SAM constant} Let $f:\\R^n\\rightarrow\\R$ be a smooth convex function whose gradient is Lipschitz continuous with constant $L>0$. Given any initial point $x^1\\in\\R^n$, let $\\set{x^k}$ be generated by the SAM method with the iterative procedure\n% \\begin{align}\\label{iterative SAM}\n% x^{k+1}=x^k-t_k\\nabla f\\brac{x^k+\\rho_k\\frac{\\nabla f(x^k)}{\\norm{\\nabla f(x^k)}}}\n% \\end{align}\n% for all $k\\in \\N$ with nonnegative stepsizes and perturbation radii satisfying the conditions\n% \\begin{align}\\label{parameter constant rho}\n% \\sum_{k=1}^\\infty t_k^2<\\infty,\\; \\sum_{k=1}^\\infty t_k=\\infty,\\; \\sup_{k\\in\\N}\\rho_k<\\infty.\n% \\end{align}\n% Assume that $\\nabla f(x^k)\\ne 0$ for all $k\\in\\N$ and that $\\inf_{k\\in\\N} f(x^k)>-\\infty$. Then the following assertions hold:\n\n% {\\bf(i)} $\\displaystyle{\\liminf_{k\\rightarrow \\infty}}\\;\\nabla f(x^k)=0$.\n \n% {\\bf(ii)} If $f$ has a nonempty bounded level set, then $\\set{x^k}$ is bounded, every accumulation point of $\\set{x^k}$ is a global minimizer of $f$, and $\\set{f(x^k)}$ converges to the optimal value of $f$. If in addition $f$ has a unique minimizer, then the sequence $\\set{x^k}$ converges to that minimizer.\n% \\end{theorem}\n\n\n% \\begin{lemma}[three sequences lemma]\\rm\\label{three sequences lemma}\n% Let $\\{\\alpha_k\\},\\{\\beta_k\\}, \\{\\gamma_k\\}$ be sequences of nonnegative numbers satisfying the conditions\n% \\begin{align}\n% &\\alpha_{k+1}-\\alpha_k\\le \\beta_k\\alpha_k+ \\gamma_k\\tag{a}\\;\\text{ for sufficient large }\\;k\\in\\N,\\label{a}\\\\\n% &\\set{\\beta_k}\\text{ is bounded},\\sum_{k=1}^\\infty \\beta_k=\\infty,\\; \\sum_{k=1}^\\infty \\gamma_k<\\infty,\\;\\mbox{ and }\\;\\sum_{k=1}^\\infty \\beta_k\\alpha_k^2<\\infty.\\tag{b} \\label{b}\n% \\end{align}\n% Then we have that $\\alpha_k\\rightarrow0$ as $k\\to\\infty$.\n% \\end{lemma}\n% \\begin{proof}\n% First we show that $\\liminf_{k\\rightarrow\\infty}\\alpha_k=0.$ Supposing the contrary gives us some $\\delta>0$ and $N\\in \\N$ such that $\\alpha_k\\ge \\delta$ for all $k\\ge N$. Combining this with the second and the third condition in \\eqref{b} yields\n% \\begin{align*}\n% \\infty>\\sum_{k=N}^\\infty \\beta_k\\alpha_k^2\\ge \\delta^2 \\sum_{k=N}^\\infty \\beta_k=\\infty,\n% \\end{align*}\n% which is a contradiction verifying the claim.\n% Let us now show that in fact $\\lim_{k\\rightarrow\\infty} \\alpha_k=0.$ Indeed, by the boundedness of $\\set{\\beta_k}$ define $\\bar\\beta:=\\sup_{k\\in\\N}\\beta_k$ and deduce from \\eqref{a} that there exists $K\\in\\N$ such that \n% \\begin{align}\\label{alpha con beta}\n% \\alpha_{k+1}-\\alpha_k\\le \\beta_k\\alpha_k+ \\gamma_k\\text{ for all }k\\ge K.\n% \\end{align}\n% Pick $\\varepsilon>0$ and find by $\\liminf_{k\\rightarrow\\infty}\\alpha_k=0$ and the two last conditions in \\eqref{b} some $K_\\varepsilon\\in\\N$ with $K_\\varepsilon\\ge K$, $\\alpha_{K_\\varepsilon}\\le \\varepsilon$,\n% \\begin{align}\\label{1 by 18}\n% \\sum_{k=K_\\varepsilon}^\\infty \\gamma_k<\\frac{\\varepsilon}{3}, \\sum_{k=K_\\varepsilon}^\\infty \\beta_k\\alpha_k^2<\\frac{\\varepsilon^2 }{3},\\;\\text{ and }\\; \\bar\\beta\\beta_k\\alpha_k^2\\le \\frac{\\varepsilon^2}{9}\\;\\text{ as }\\;k\\ge K_\\varepsilon.\n% \\end{align}\n% It suffices to show that $\\alpha_k\\le 2\\varepsilon$ for all $k\\ge K_\\varepsilon.$ Fix $k\\ge K_\\varepsilon$ and observe that for $\\alpha_k\\le \\varepsilon$ the desired inequality is obviously satisfied. If $\\alpha_k>\\varepsilon,$ we use $\\alpha_{K_\\varepsilon}\\le \\varepsilon$ and find some $k'<k$ such that $k'\\ge K_\\varepsilon$ and \n% \\begin{align*}\n% \\alpha_{k'}\\le \\varepsilon\\;\\text{ and }\\;\\alpha_i >\\varepsilon\\;\\text{ for }\\; i=k,k-1,\\ldots,k'+1.\n% \\end{align*}\n% Then we deduce from \\eqref{alpha con beta} and \\eqref{1 by 18} that\n% \\begin{align*}\n% \\alpha_k- \\alpha_{k'}&= \\sum_{i=k'}^{k-1}\\brac{\\alpha_{i+1}-\\alpha_i}\\le \\sum_{i=k'}^{k-1}\\brac{ \\beta_i\\alpha_i+ \\gamma_i}\\\\\n% &=\\sum_{i=k'+1}^{k} \\beta_i\\alpha_i+\\sum_{i=k'}^{k-1} \\gamma_i+\\beta_{k'}\\alpha_{k'} \\\\\n% &\\le \\frac{1}{\\varepsilon}\\sum_{i=k'+1}^{k}\\beta_i \\alpha_i^2+ \\sum_{i=k'}^{k-1}\\gamma_i+\\sqrt{\\beta_{k'}}\\sqrt{\\beta_{k'}}\\alpha_{k'}\\\\\n% &\\le \\frac{1}{\\varepsilon}\\sum_{i=K_\\varepsilon}^{\\infty}\\beta_i \\alpha_i^2+ \\sum_{i=K_\\varepsilon}^{\\infty}\\gamma_i+\\sqrt{\\bar \\beta \\beta_{k'}\\alpha_{k'}^2}\\\\\n% &\\le \\frac{1}{\\varepsilon}\\frac{\\varepsilon^2}{3}+\\frac{\\varepsilon}{3}+\\frac{\\varepsilon}{3}=\\varepsilon.\n% \\end{align*}\n% As a consequence, we arrive at the estimate\n% \\begin{align*}\n% \\alpha_k= \\alpha_{k'}+\\alpha_k -\\alpha_{k'}\\le \\varepsilon+\\varepsilon=2\\varepsilon\\;\\mbox{ for all }\\;k\\ge K_\\ve, \n% \\end{align*}\n% which verifies that $\\alpha_k\\rightarrow 0$ as $k\\to\\infty$ sand thus completes the proof of the lemma.\n% \\end{proof}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: content/05_experiments.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Experiments}\n\\label{sec:experiments}\n\n\\subsection{Experimental Setup}\nTo ensure a scientifically sound evaluation across our MIA tasks, we restrict our setup to models trained on public datasets with well-defined training and test splits. We evaluate our method across three diverse modalities to demonstrate its broad applicability. For image generation, we analyze SOTA autoregressive models (VAR-d\\{20, 24, 30\\}~\\citep{tian2024var}, RAR-\\{L, XL, XXL\\}~\\citep{yu2024rar}) and diffusion models (DiT-RF-\\{XL, G\\}~\\citep{fei2024dit}, UViT-T2I-Deep~\\citep{bao2022uvit}), trained primarily on the ImageNet~\\citep{deng2009imagenet} or COCO~\\citep{veit2016coco} datasets for class-conditioned and text-to-image generation. We extend this evaluation to the audio domain using modern Voice Conversion models (AutoVC~\\citep{qian2019autovc}, FreeVC~\\citep{li2023freevc}), and to the language domain utilizing prominent LLMs (LLaMA-13B~\\citep{touvron2023llama}, Pythia-6.9B~\\citep{biderman2023pythia}, OLMo-7B~\\citep{groeneveld2024olmo}, and OPT-6.7B~\\citep{zhang2022opt}). Comprehensive details regarding all specific models and datasets used in experiments are provided in the Appendix~\\ref{app:model_details} and~\\ref{app:dataset_details}.\nAll experiments were conducted on a machine equipped with 3 NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell GPUs (48 GB VRAM each) and an Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y CPU.\n\n\\subsection{Metrics}\n\\label{sec:metrics}\nTo measure similarity between feature representations and their fidelity, we utilize the Fréchet Inception Distance (FID)~\\citep{heusel2017fid}, and Fréchet Audio Distance (FAD)~\\citep{kilgour2018fad} for vision and audio models, respectively. For LLMs, we measure Token Diversity as the Kullback–Leibler Divergence (KLD) between the normalized average token probability distribution at the current iteration and that of the first evaluation iteration:\nToken Diversity at iteration \\( t \\) (for \\( t > 1 \\)) is defined as the\nKullback-Leibler divergence from iteration \\( 1 \\):\n\\[\n\\mathrm{TokenDiversity}(t)\n=\nD_{\\mathrm{KL}}\\!\\left( p_t \\,\\|\\, p_1 \\right)\n=\n\\sum_{i \\in V} p_t(i)\\,\\log \\frac{p_t(i)}{p_1(i)}.\n\\]\nwhere $p_t$ and $p_1$ are the normalized average token probability distributions for step $t$ and step $1$ respectively.\n\n\\subsection{MIA and DI procedures}\n\\label{sec:madremia-mia-di}\n\n\\paragraph{MIA pipeline.}\nFor each labeled member/non-member sample, we generate $Z_0,\\dots,Z_T$, compute $\\phi_t$, $S_T$, and modality-specific trajectory features, form $\\tilde z$, and fit $h_{\\mathrm{mia}}$. We evaluate univariate trajectory statistics by direct thresholding and multivariate features by logistic-regression fusion on strictly stratified 80/20 train-test splits. We report AUC, TPR at 1\\% FPR, and accuracy.\nSplitting is performed at sample/source level before trajectory generation: all descendants of the same $Z_0$ (all $Z_t$, all derived features) remain in the same partition. Thresholds, feature normalization, and LR calibration are fit on train only and applied unchanged to test.\nPrimary endpoint is the multivariate fusion score; univariate $S_T^\\star$ results are reported as theory-aligned diagnostics.\nIf $T$ is tuned, it is selected on train (or a train-only validation split) and never on test. We use established metrics: TPR@FPR=1\\%, AUC, and Accuracy.\n % We quantify uncertainty with repeated splits/seeds and bootstrap confidence intervals (including low-FPR operating points).\\todo{what exactly?}\n\n\\paragraph{DI pipeline.}\nThe DI pipeline is identical, replacing the target label with dataset-origin variable $D$. The same $Z_t$, $\\phi_t$, and trajectory-fusion machinery is used; only label semantics and calibration change. For DI, splitting/evaluation are performed at dataset or source-group level, and per-sample logits are aggregated by a fixed mean rule into a dataset-level score. Dataset-level decisions are evaluated against a permutation-based null over dataset labels within the evaluation fold.\n\nBoth MIA and DI setups inherit standard generative privacy-audit conventions, including the IAR setting introduced in~\\citep{kowalczuk2025privacy}.\n\n\\subsection{Research questions}\nWe evaluate whether chained regeneration can be a signal amplifier for one-shot auditing across modalities, model families, and access regimes. Our analysis focuses on the following questions: \n\\textbf{(Q1)} What distinguishes member/non-member chained generation trajectories?\n\\textbf{(Q2)} Can one-shot membership signal be amplified for single $\\phi(t)$ features? What are the gains for trajectory-based $S_T$ over $\\phi(t)$ across modalities?\n\\textbf{(Q3)} Does MADreMIA increase member/non-member separability compared to one-shot MIA?\n\\textbf{(Q4)} Does increasing generative model stochasticity during regeneration loop affect the trajectories separation between members and non-members?\n\\textbf{(Q5)} How does model size affect member/nonmember trajectory signals?\n Finally, we also provide a short analysis of the Getty Images case~\\cite{coulter2024gettyvsstabilityai} in Appendix~\\ref{app:getty}.\n\n\\subsection{Members and Nonmembers differ in generative trajectories: qaulitative results.}\nAcross all modalities, members and non-members exhibit distinct regeneration dynamics. Members preserve structure longer and drift more slowly, while non-members degrade faster and diverge toward the model’s generic prior. This pattern is visible both in per-step qualitative examples (\\Cref{fig:mem_trajectory,fig:nonmem_trajectory}) and in aggregate divergence trajectories (\\Cref{fig:fid-proof}) comparing the quality of regenerations to base samples (FID for images, FAD for audio) and the drift of output token distribution in text model. The results presented support the core hypothesis that auto-regeneration trajectory contains multiple membership cues. The key trajectory asymmetry findings are:\n\n\\begin{enumerate}\n \\item \\textbf{Fidelity and degradation:} \\colorbox{okFill}{Re-members} maintain high structural quality throughout the trajectory, whereas \\colorbox{badFill}{re-non-members} exhibit rapid perceptual and semantic degradation.\n \\item \\textbf{Persistence and divergence:} \\colorbox{okFill}{Re-members} demonstrate significant structural persistence and coherence across iterations. Conversely, \\colorbox{badFill}{re-non-members} diverge more quickly, drifting toward the model’s general distribution and losing the specific characteristics of the original input.\n \\vspace{-0.5cm}\n\\end{enumerate}\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.48\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{figures/members_trajectory_grid.pdf}\n \\caption{Members.}\n \\label{fig:mem_trajectory}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.48\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{figures/nonmembers_trajectory_grid.pdf}\n \\caption{Non-members.}\n \\label{fig:nonmem_trajectory}\n \\end{subfigure}\n\n \\caption{\\textbf{Qualitative comparison of members and non-members across iterative regeneration (VAR-d30).} Non-member images quality degrades faster than members, whose semantic coherence is largely preserved across regenerations.}\n \\label{fig:mem_vs_nonmem_trajectory}\n \\vspace{-0.5cm}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\paragraph{The asymmetry is present across diverse models and modalities.}\nWe test broad architectural diversity: image autoregressive and diffusion models, audio voice conversion/generation models, and text generative models. \\Cref{fig:fid-proof} summarizes trajectory behavior using modality-appropriate divergence metrics~\\ref{sec:metrics}. This design directly tests whether our proposed signal amplification is model- and modality-agnostic.\n\n% \\paragraph{MADreMIA amplifies baseline MIA.}\n% Table \\ref{tab:mia_summary_compact} compares the performance of our MADreMIA framework against the one-shot MIA baseline. The results demonstrate that augmenting the baseline with auxiliary signals -- specifically image generation quality (LPIPS/MSE) and diversity (MSE std) -- consistently improves attack effectiveness across all metrics. Our MADreMIA (Combined) approach achieves the strongest performance, yielding a TPR of 0.072 at a 1\\% FPR, which represents a significant relative improvement over the baseline. This confirms that reconstruction-based features provide critical signal for identifying training set membership.\n\n\\subsection{$\\phi(t)$ statistics may increase membership signal over one-shot $\\phi(0)$.}\n\\label{sec:theory-validation-summary}\n\nWe evaluate the validity of our theoretical assumptions using empirical generative trajectories, fixing $T$ to the first 15 iterations. As summarized in Table~\\ref{tab:assumption-support-restricted}, while Assumption A2 is fully supported, A1 and A3 receive only partial empirical backing. Specifically, for certain values of $\\phi_t$, the absence of clear exponential decay within the first 15 iterations is acceptable for our main claim, since it indicates slower or plateau-like leakage. It suggests that non-exponential leakage forms may also govern real trajectories.\n\nTo assess the efficacy of modality-specific trajectory statistics, we evaluate whether aggregated trajectory evidence remains competitive with - or outperforms - the one-shot evidence. We define\n$\n\\mathrm{gain}:=\\frac{\\max_T \\mathrm{SNR}^2(S_T)}{\\max_t \\mathrm{SNR}^2(\\phi_t)},\n$\nand show results in Table~\\ref{tab:gains}. Trajectory diagnostics are strong:\n$\nP(\\mathrm{gain}\\ge 1)=\\frac{8}{11}=0.73,\\qquad\nP(\\mathrm{gain}\\ge 0.9)=\\frac{10}{11}=0.91,\n$\nwith median gain $=1.00$. Given the small number of tested features, we interpret these numbers as supportive preliminary evidence. \n\n% \\begin{table}[t]\n% \\centering\n% \\small\n% \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.4\\linewidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\caption{$S_T$ gains over $\\phi_t$ across modalities.}\n% \\begin{tabular}{lccccc}\n% \\toprule\n% Family & $n$ & $P(\\mathrm{gain}\\ge 1)$ & $P(\\mathrm{gain}\\ge 0.9)$ & Median gain \\\\\n% \\midrule\n% VAR & 3 & 0.67 & 1.00 & 1.00 \\\\\n% Diffusion & 3 & 0.67 & 1.00 & 1.00 \\\\\n% LLM & 5 & 0.80 & 0.80 & 1.04 \\\\\n% \\bottomrule\n% \\end{tabular}\n% \\label{tab:gains}\n% \\end{minipage}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{minipage}[t]{0.4\\linewidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\caption{Assumption support across different model families.}\n% \\begin{tabular}{lccc}\n% \\toprule\n% Family & A1 & A2 & A3 \\\\\n% \\midrule\n% VAR & $3/3$ & $3/3$ & $3/3$ \\\\\n% Diffusion & $3/3$ & $3/3$ & $2/3$ \\\\\n% LLM & $3/5$ & $5/5$ & $2/5$ \\\\\n% \\bottomrule\n% \\end{tabular}\n% \\label{tab:assumption-support-restricted}\n% \\end{minipage}\n% \\end{table}\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\begin{minipage}[t]{0.48\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\caption{\\textbf{$S_T$ gains over $\\phi_t$ across modalities.} $P(\\text{gain} \\ge 1)$ indicates the fraction of models where scoring matches or exceeds the baseline.}\n \\vspace{0.5em}\n \\begin{tabular}{lcccc}\n \\toprule\n Family & $n$ & $P(\\ge 1)$ & $P(\\ge 0.9)$ & Median \\\\\n \\midrule\n VAR & 3 & 0.67 & 1.00 & 1.00 \\\\\n Diffusion & 3 & 0.67 & 1.00 & 1.00 \\\\\n LLM & 5 & 0.80 & 0.80 & 1.04 \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n \\label{tab:gains}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\hfill\n\\begin{minipage}[t]{0.48\\linewidth}\n \\centering\n \\caption{\\textbf{Assumption support across model families.} Fractions indicate the number of models satisfying each assumption.}\n \\vspace{0.5em}\n \\begin{tabular}{lccc}\n \\toprule\n Family & A1 & A2 & A3 \\\\\n \\midrule\n VAR & $3/3$ & $3/3$ & $3/3$ \\\\\n Diffusion & $3/3$ & $3/3$ & $2/3$ \\\\\n LLM & $3/5$ & $5/5$ & $2/5$ \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n \\label{tab:assumption-support-restricted}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\end{table}\n\n\n\n\\subsection{MADreMIA amplifies baseline MIA}\n\\Cref{tab:mia-llm,tab:mia-iar} compare MADreMIA-augmented attacks against their unaided baselines across LLMs and IARs. Across all base attacks and model families, incorporating reconstruction \\textit{Diversity} ($MSE_{\\text{sum}}$, $LPIPS_{\\text{sum}}$), \\textit{Quality} ($SSIM_{\\text{sum}}$, $SSIM_{\\text{std}}$), or both (\\textit{Combined}) consistently raises attack performance. Gains are most pronounced on OLMo-7B, where, for example, the Zlib baseline collapses to AUC 0.179 yet recovers to 0.868 with Combined signals, and CAMIA reaches AUC 0.969 — the strongest result across all settings. On the remaining LLMs the improvements are more modest but consistent. For IARs, MADreMIA yields clear gains in classification accuracy: VAR-d30 improves from 0.607 to 0.696 (+8.9 p.p.) and RAR-XXL from 0.562 to 0.713 (+15.1 p.p.), although TPR@1\\%FPR gains are smaller and less stable. Together, these results confirm that iterative reconstruction signals provide complementary, architecture-agnostic information that reliably strengthens membership inference across both LLMs and IARs.\n% \\Cref{tab:mia-llm,tab:mia-iar} evaluate the MADreMIA framework by comparing auxiliary-signal-augmented attacks against the one-shot baseline (Iter 0) across two distinct model families. The results demonstrate that augmenting the baseline with reconstruction-based quality ($MSE_{\\text{sum}}$) and diversity ($MSE_{\\text{std}}$) signals consistently improves attack effectiveness. Our MADreMIA (Combined) approach proves particularly potent for the larger RAR-XXL model, yielding a TPR of 0.068 at a 1\\% FPR and a substantial +15.3 p.p. absolute gain in classification accuracy. This robust performance across architectures confirms that iterative reconstruction features provide critical, scalable signals for identifying training set membership.\n\n\\vspace{-0.3cm}\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\scriptsize\n\\caption{MIA results on established LLM benchmarks (described in detail in Appendix~\\ref{app:dataset_details}), where MADreMIA trajectory features are aggregated across 15 iterations. Augmenting any base attack with diversity, quality, or combined signals consistently improves all the metrics over the unaided baselines.}\n\\label{tab:mia-llm}\n\\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{\n\\begin{tabular}{l|cc|cc|cc|cc}\n\\toprule\n & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{Pythia-6.9B} & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{OLMo-7B} & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{OPT-6.7B} & \\multicolumn{2}{c}{Llama-13B} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){2-3} \\cmidrule(lr){4-5} \\cmidrule(lr){6-7} \\cmidrule(lr){8-9}\nAttack & TPR@1\\%FPR & AUC & TPR@1\\%FPR & AUC & TPR@1\\%FPR & AUC & TPR@1\\%FPR & AUC \\\\\n\\midrule\nLoss~\\cite{yeom2018privacy} & 0.004 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.00} & 0.349 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.008 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.523 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.013 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.390 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} & 0.009 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.368 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} \\\\\n~+ Diversity & 0.093 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.06} & 0.647 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & \\textbf{0.303} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.09} & 0.735 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} & 0.092 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.12} & 0.613 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.09} & 0.173 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.14} & 0.690 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} \\\\\n~+ Quality & 0.096 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} & \\textbf{0.686} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & 0.032 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} & 0.702 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} & 0.084 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.09} & 0.652 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} & \\textbf{0.198} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.13} & 0.679 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.09} \\\\\n~+ Combined & \\textbf{0.100} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & 0.673 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.06} & 0.263 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.14} & \\textbf{0.804} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & \\textbf{0.112} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.12} & \\textbf{0.672} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.09} & 0.188 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.15} & \\textbf{0.702} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} \\\\\n\\midrule\nZlib~\\cite{carlini2021zlib}) & 0.000 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.00} & 0.338 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.022 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.179 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.012 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.369 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.009 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.337 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n~+ Diversity & \\textbf{0.129} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & 0.677 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & \\textbf{0.318} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.11} & 0.842 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.099 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.11} & 0.628 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & 0.176 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.14} & 0.689 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} \\\\\n~+ Quality & 0.124 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & 0.673 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.06} & 0.208 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.10} & 0.833 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.092 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.10} & 0.667 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & \\textbf{0.210} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.14} & 0.688 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} \\\\\n~+ Combined & 0.128 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & \\textbf{0.690} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.06} & 0.295 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.14} & \\textbf{0.868} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & \\textbf{0.121} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.12} & \\textbf{0.672} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & 0.194 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.15} & \\textbf{0.693} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} \\\\\n\\midrule\nMin-K\\%~\\cite{shi2023mink} & \\textbf{0.124} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & 0.680 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & 0.067 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} & 0.703 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} & 0.086 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.11} & 0.650 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & 0.127 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.11} & 0.648 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.09} \\\\\n~+ Diversity & 0.120 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} & 0.677 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & 0.219 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & 0.775 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.064 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.09} & 0.640 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & 0.144 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.13} & 0.685 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} \\\\\n~+ Quality & \\textbf{0.124} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} & \\textbf{0.695} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & 0.095 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.09} & 0.772 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & \\textbf{0.094} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.11} & 0.674 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.09} & 0.178 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.14} & 0.686 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} \\\\\n~+ Combined & 0.113 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} & 0.694 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & \\textbf{0.240} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.15} & \\textbf{0.837} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.092 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.10} & \\textbf{0.694} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & \\textbf{0.182} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.14} & \\textbf{0.700} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} \\\\\n\\midrule\n% Min-K\\%++ & 0.034 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & 0.529 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.12} & 0.054 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.06} & 0.534 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.20} & \\textbf{0.112} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.11} & 0.653 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.09} & 0.190 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.13} & 0.754 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.06} \\\\\n% ~+ Diversity & 0.044 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & \\textbf{0.558} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.06} & \\textbf{0.316} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.12} & 0.734 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} & 0.106 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.11} & 0.668 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & 0.204 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.13} & 0.760 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} \\\\\n% ~+ Quality & \\textbf{0.047} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & 0.494 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & 0.046 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} & 0.713 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} & 0.097 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.10} & \\textbf{0.687} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & \\textbf{0.230} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.15} & 0.773 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} \\\\\n% ~+ Combined & 0.040 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} & 0.550 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.06} & 0.254 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.15} & \\textbf{0.807} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.099 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.12} & 0.681 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.09} & 0.226 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.15} & \\textbf{0.782} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} \\\\\n% \\midrule\nCAMIA~\\cite{chang2025camia} & 0.111 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.09} & 0.683 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & 0.428 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.25} & 0.958 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & \\textbf{0.128} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.12} & 0.664 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & 0.166 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.13} & 0.686 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.09} \\\\\n~+ Diversity & 0.118 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & 0.690 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & 0.517 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.25} & 0.966 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.104 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.11} & 0.668 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & 0.146 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.12} & 0.692 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} \\\\\n~+ Quality & \\textbf{0.131} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & \\textbf{0.708} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & 0.501 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.26} & 0.964 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.115 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.13} & 0.682 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & \\textbf{0.192} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.14} & 0.712 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} \\\\\n~+ Combined & 0.109 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & 0.696 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & \\textbf{0.553} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.27} & \\textbf{0.969} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.109 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.12} & \\textbf{0.689} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & 0.176 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.13} & \\textbf{0.716} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{table}[h!]\n\\centering\n\\scriptsize\n\\caption{MIA results on IARs, where MADreMIA trajectory features are aggregated across 10 iterations (benchmark details in Appendix~\\ref{app:dataset_details}). While AUC remains stable across augmentation variants, TPR@1\\%FPR and Accuracy improve substantially.}\n\\label{tab:mia-iar}\n\\begin{tabular}{l|ccc|ccc}\n\\toprule\n & \\multicolumn{3}{c|}{VAR-d30} & \\multicolumn{3}{c}{RAR-XXL} \\\\\n\\cmidrule(lr){2-4} \\cmidrule(lr){5-7}\nAttack & TPR@1\\%FPR & AUC & ACC & TPR@1\\%FPR & AUC & ACC \\\\\n\\midrule\nBaseline~\\citep{kowalczuk2025privacy} & 0.040 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.750 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.607 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} & 0.044 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.754 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.562 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} \\\\\n~+ Diversity & \\textbf{0.090} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.09} & 0.755 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.691 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & \\textbf{0.084} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.06} & 0.771 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.700 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n~+ Quality & 0.076 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.08} & \\textbf{0.757} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & \\textbf{0.703} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.079 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} & 0.754 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} & 0.703 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n~+ Combined & 0.088 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.06} & 0.750 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} & 0.696 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.069 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & \\textbf{0.775} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & \\textbf{0.713} {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\n\n\n\\subsection{MADreMIA amplifies baseline DI}\n% \\Cref{fig:di} shows that MADreMIA trajectory features consistently reduce the sample budget required for confident dataset-level inference across all evaluated architectures. On Pythia-6.9B, augmented variants reach the 95\\% confidence threshold at around 100 samples versus roughly 150 for the baseline, a moderate but reliable improvement shared across all three signal types. On RAR-XXL the benefit is more pronounced, with augmented variants crossing the confidence threshold roughly 100 samples earlier than the baseline. The p-value histograms corroborate these findings throughout: the Combined variant consistently shifts the distribution of $-\\log_{10}(p)$ values rightward relative to the baseline, confirming that individual trials yield stronger and more reliable statistical evidence for dataset inference.\n\nThe p-value histograms in \\Cref{fig:di} demonstrate that MADreMIA trajectory features consistently strengthen the statistical evidence for dataset-level inference across all evaluated architectures. On Pythia-6.9B, augmented variants reach the 95\\% confidence threshold at around 100 samples versus roughly 150 for the baseline. Furthermore, augmented variants shift the distribution of $-\\log_{10}(p)$ values noticeably rightward relative to the baseline, with this pattern holding across all three signal types. The effect is more pronounced on RAR-XXL, where the Combined variant produces a substantially larger rightward shift, indicating that individual trials yield stronger and more reliable evidence for membership inference.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n % ---------- Row 1 ----------\n % \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.38\\columnwidth}\n % \\centering\n % \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/di/di_success_rates_pythia.pdf}\n % \\caption{Pythia-6.9B}\n % \\end{subfigure}\n % \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/di/di_distribution_ecdf_pythia.pdf}\n \\caption{Pythia-6.9B}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/di/di2_distribution_ecdf_RAR.pdf}\n \\caption{RAR-XXL}\n \\end{subfigure}\n % \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.38\\columnwidth}\n % \\centering\n % \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/di/di_success_rates_RAR.pdf}\n % \\caption{RAR-XXL}\n % \\end{subfigure}\n % \\vspace{0.6em}\n % % ---------- Row 2 ----------\n\n \\caption{\\textbf{Dataset Inference} performance on selected models.}\n \\label{fig:di}\n\\end{figure}\n\n% \\begin{figure}[t]\n% \\centering\n\n% % ---------- Row 1 ----------\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/di/di_success_rates_pythia.pdf}\n% \\caption{Pythia-6.9B}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/di/di_success_rates_RAR.pdf}\n% \\caption{RAR-XXL}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\vspace{0.6em}\n\n% % ---------- Row 2 ----------\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/di/di_distribution_ecdf_pythia.pdf}\n% \\caption{Pythia-6.9B}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/di/di2_distribution_ecdf_RAR.pdf}\n% \\caption{RAR-XXL}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\caption{Dataset Inference performance on selected models.}\n% \\label{fig:di}\n% \\end{figure}\n\\vspace{-0.3cm}\n\n\\subsection{Sensitivity analysis of generation strength}\nFigure~\\ref{fig:korbka} shows PR curves for VAR-d30 across regeneration strengths $s \\in \\{2, 4, 6, 8\\}$, where $s$ controls how many final scales are regenerated. Members consistently achieve higher precision and recall than non-members across all values of $s$, confirming that the MIA signal is robust to the choice of regeneration strength. As $s$ increases, however, the two groups converge in PR space (see Appendix~\\ref{app:rpc}).\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.22\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/korbka/pr_curve_var_30_s2.pdf}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.22\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/korbka/pr_curve_var_30_s4.pdf}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.22\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/korbka/pr_curve_var_30_s6.pdf}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.28\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/korbka/pr_curve_var_30_s8.pdf}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Precision-Recall curves for VAR-d30} across regeneration strengths $s \\in \\{2, 4, 6, 8\\}$. Members (green) and Non-Members (red) are traced over 15 iterations, with color intensity indicating iteration progress. Larger $s$ corresponds to more aggressive regeneration.}\n \\label{fig:korbka}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\subsection{Trajectory asymmetry scaling across model families}\nAs illustrated in \\Cref{fig:size-ablation}, the membership signal -- quantified by $\\Delta\\text{FID} = \\text{FID}_{\\text{nonmem}} - \\text{FID}_{\\text{mem}}$ persists across all model scales, suggesting that the observed asymmetry is a fundamental property rather than an artifact of specific parameter regimes. While the magnitude of this separation varies across architectures, its relationship with model scale is not uniform. The separation grows stronger with model size in VAR and DiT-MoE, but remains largely unaffected by scaling in RARs. Ultimately, the underlying trend is robust: iterative trajectory chaining consistently exposes a larger membership gap compared to standard one-shot generations.\n\\begin{figure}[h!]\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/size_ablation/rar_fid_diff.pdf}\n \\caption{RAR}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/size_ablation/var_fid_diff.pdf}\n \\caption{VAR}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/size_ablation/dit_fid_diff.pdf}\n \\caption{DiT-MoE}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption{\\textbf{Ablation: Trajectory asymmetry scaling across model families.} Membership separation ($\\Delta $ FID) persists across model scales, confirming that iterative trajectory chaining consistently amplifies membership signals compared to one-shot baselines.}\n \\label{fig:size-ablation}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% NOTES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% We evaluate both membership inference and dataset inference under a unified black-box protocol across image, audio, and language models. Because different deployment settings emphasize different operating points, we report a collection of complementary metrics rather than relying on a single scalar summary.\n\n% \\begin{figure*}[t]\n% \\centering\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/rar_xxl.pdf}\n% \\caption{RAR-XXL}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/var_30.pdf}\n% \\caption{VAR-d30}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/dit_g.pdf}\n% \\caption{DiT-MoE-G}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n\n% \\vspace{1mm}\n\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/uvit_t2i_deep.pdf}\n% \\caption{UViT-T2I-Deep}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/freevc.pdf}\n% \\caption{FreeVC}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/autovc.pdf}\n% \\caption{AutoVC}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n\n% \\vspace{1mm}\n\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/olmo_7b.pdf}\n% \\caption{OLMo 7B}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/gpt_neo_20b.pdf}\n% \\caption{GPT-Neox-20B}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/pythia_12b.pdf}\n% \\caption{Pythia-12B}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n\n% \\vspace{1mm}\n\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/mamba.pdf}\n% \\caption{Mamba-1.4B}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/llama.pdf}\n% \\caption{Llama-13B}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/fid_panels/pythia_12b.pdf}\n% \\caption{TODO}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n\n% \\caption{Each panel plots illustrative FID trajectories across regeneration steps for member and non-member examples on VAR, RAR, TODO . The intended qualitative pattern is that member examples retain lower FID and degrade more slowly, whereas non-member examples drift faster under repeated regeneration. This figure is a mock layout for paper development and should be replaced with final experimental curves.}\n% \\label{fig:fid-proof}\n% \\end{figure*}\n\n\n% \\begin{figure*}\n% \\centering\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/size_ablation/rar_fid_diff.pdf}\n% \\caption{RAR}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/size_ablation/var_fid_diff.pdf}\n% \\caption{VAR}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\hfill\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.32\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/size_ablation/dit_fid_diff.pdf}\n% \\caption{DiT-MoE}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\caption{Model size ablation. Delta FID is FID(nonmem) - FID(mem)}\n% \\end{figure*}\n\n% \\subsection{Getty Images case}\n% As a concrete dataset-inference case study connected to the Getty Images v.~Stability AI dispute discussed in Section~3, we evaluate whether chained regeneration can distinguish images that are plausibly associated with the Stable Diffusion training distribution from images that are very unlikely to have been included. We use Stable Diffusion~1.5 as the target model. For the positive pool, we extract 2{,}000 images from LAION-2B whose metadata contains the string ``gettyimages'' and treat them as \\textit{members}. For the negative pool, we collect 2{,}000 images from the Getty Images website whose upload date is after January~1,~2025, and treat them as \\textit{non-members}. Because these images post-date the original Stable Diffusion~1.5 training era (late 2022), they provide a conservative practical control group for this experiment.\n\n% \\begin{figure}[bt]\n% \\centering\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.48\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/getty_ssim.pdf}\n% \\caption{SSIM $(\\uparrow)$}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.48\\columnwidth}\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/getty_mse.pdf}\n% \\caption{Reconstruction Error (MSE) $(\\downarrow)$}\n% \\end{subfigure}\n% \\label{fig:getty}\n% \\caption{Getty Images case}\n% \\end{figure}\n\n% For each pool, we run the same chained-regeneration procedure for 15 iterations and summarize the trajectories with SSIM and reconstruction error (MSE) (Figure~\\ref{fig:getty}). The SSIM plot measures whether regenerations remain structurally closer to the initial query for the member pool than for the non-member pool. The MSE plot provides a complementary pixel-level view across regeneration depth by measuring how quickly reconstructed samples drift away from their reference images. In our experiments, the two pools remain visibly separated under both SSIM and MSE. We do not use FID in this case, because it is very unstable on 2{,}000-image pools. We still interpret MSE conservatively: it is sensitive to low-level reconstruction error rather than semantic fidelity alone. For this reason, we use MSE as a stable auxiliary trajectory measure across iterations, while SSIM remains the more directly interpretable structural signal in this case study.\n\n\n% \\begin{table}\n% \\caption{MIA Results for VAR-d30 - VALID PATRZĄC NA WYNIKI KOWALCZUKA}\n% \\label{tab:var_30_llm_mia}\n% \\begin{tabular}{lccc}\n% \\toprule\n% Method & TPR@1\\%FPR & AUC & ACC \\\\\n% \\midrule\n% Iter 0 (just MIA) & 0.041 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.753 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.617 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} \\\\\n% Iter 1 & 0.011 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.516 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.494 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} \\\\\n% Iter 2 & 0.012 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.493 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.489 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} \\\\\n% Iter 3 & 0.008 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.525 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.513 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} \\\\\n% Iter 4 & 0.008 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.542 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.522 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} \\\\\n% Iter 5 & 0.008 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.514 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.510 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} \\\\\n% \\midrule\n% Traj: AUC (Integral) & 0.012 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.565 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.530 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n% Traj: Mean-Pooling & 0.012 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.591 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.515 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} \\\\\n% Traj: L2-Norm & 0.012 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.587 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.537 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n% \\midrule\n% Iter 0 + MSE & 0.061 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} & 0.747 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} & 0.689 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} \\\\\n% Iter 0 + MSE\\_std & 0.070 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} & 0.759 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.700 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n% Iter 0 + MSE\\_max & 0.065 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.06} & 0.749 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} & 0.691 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} \\\\\n% Iter 0 + MSE\\_min & 0.072 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} & 0.752 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.691 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n% Iter 0 + LPIPS & 0.063 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} & 0.760 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.699 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n% Iter 0 + SSIM & 0.063 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.07} & 0.755 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.694 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n% Iter 0 + all & 0.057 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.06} & 0.755 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} & 0.698 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.04} \\\\\n% \\bottomrule\n% \\end{tabular}\n% \\end{table}\n\n\n% \\begin{table}\n% \\caption{MIA Results for RAR-XXL - VALID PATRZĄC NA WYNIKI KOWALCZUKA}\n% \\label{tab:rar_xxl_llm_mia}\n% \\begin{tabular}{lccc}\n% \\toprule\n% Method & TPR@1\\%FPR & AUC & ACC \\\\\n% \\midrule\n% Iter 0 (just MIA) & 0.048 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.757 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.566 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} \\\\\n% Iter 1 & 0.047 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.715 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.518 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} \\\\\n% Iter 2 & 0.059 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.697 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.516 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} \\\\\n% Iter 3 & 0.062 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.691 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.530 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} \\\\\n% Iter 4 & 0.034 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.661 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.504 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.00} \\\\\n% Iter 5 & 0.036 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.662 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.503 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.00} \\\\\n% \\midrule\n% Traj: AUC (Integral) & 0.047 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.712 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.503 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.00} \\\\\n% Traj: Mean-Pooling & 0.049 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.717 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.501 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.00} \\\\\n% Traj: L2-Norm & 0.048 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.02} & 0.721 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.01} & 0.503 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.00} \\\\\n% \\midrule\n% Iter 0 + MSE & 0.059 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.06} & 0.759 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.714 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n% Iter 0 + MSE\\_std & 0.060 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.06} & 0.755 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.709 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n% Iter 0 + MSE\\_max & 0.051 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & 0.764 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.713 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n% Iter 0 + MSE\\_min & 0.051 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & 0.759 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.709 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n% Iter 0 + LPIPS & 0.042 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & 0.769 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.715 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n% Iter 0 + SSIM & 0.066 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.06} & 0.759 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.707 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n% Iter 0 + all & 0.028 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.05} & 0.770 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} & 0.716 {\\tiny $\\pm$0.03} \\\\\n% \\bottomrule\n% \\end{tabular}\n% \\end{table}\n\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: content/06_conclusions.tex\n================================================\n\\vspace{-0.3cm}\n\\section{Conclusions}\nWe introduced MADreMIA, a model-agnostic membership inference signal amplifier for large generative models. By chaining repeated regenerations rather than relying on a single query, MADreMIA exploits a consistent asymmetry: member samples retain coherence across iterations while non-members drift and deteriorate. This signal generalizes across image, text, and audio generators, spanning IAR, diffusion, and LLM families. Our experimental results show that fusing trajectory-derived features with baseline MIA/DI scores further improves member/non-member separability, suggesting that iterative regeneration is a broadly applicable lens for privacy auditing and copyright attribution.\n\n% \\section{Conclusions}\n% \\todo{do przepisania} As generative models increasingly exhibit high-fidelity memorization, verifying whether specific samples were seen during training becomes central to privacy auditing and copyright attribution. Inspired by the recursive self-feeding dynamics of Model Autophagy Disorder (MAD), we introduce MADreMIA as a model-agnostic add-on for white-, grey-, and black-box generative settings: instead of relying on a single generation, it builds chained generations in which each output conditions the next. Our results show a consistent asymmetry for this iterative protocol -- training re-members retain coherence and degrade more slowly, while non-members drift and deteriorate faster across image, text, and audio generators, including IAR, diffusion, and large language model families. Finally, we show preliminary results that by fusing trajectory-derived evidence with baseline MIA features, MADreMIA amplifies membership signals and improves separability between members and non-members.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: content/07_acknowledgements.tex\n================================================\n\\subsubsection*{Acknowledgments}\nWe gratefully acknowledge Polish high-performance computing infrastructure PLGrid for providing computer facilities and support within computational grant no. PLG/2025/018391. This research was partially funded by National Science Centre, Poland, grant no: 2023/51/I/ST6/02854.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: content/08_appendix.tex\n================================================\n\\clearpage\n\\section{Impact Statement}\nThis work advances methods for auditing generative models by improving membership and dataset inference through chained regeneration. The primary positive impact is stronger accountability: MADreMIA can help detect memorization of sensitive, proprietary, or benchmark data, supporting privacy audits, copyright verification, and unlearning validation across model families and modalities.\n\nWhile enhanced inference capabilities can assist in model auditing and transparency, they also require responsible application to avoid potential misuse. We frame MADreMIA as a tool for research evaluation, compliance monitoring, and internal red-teaming. It is important to note that our method provides statistical evidence rather than a definitive proof of data inclusion; therefore, results should be interpreted alongside additional forensic and procedural evidence within a broader data governance framework.\n\n\\section{Limitations}\nWhile our proposed framework is designed to be cross-modal and model-agnostic, our experimental scope is naturally constrained by several practical and theoretical factors. Most notably, we do not conduct full Membership Inference Attack (MIA) evaluations on audio generation models. Although our initial signal-degradation experiments indicate that iterative trajectory features exist in the audio domain, the literature currently lacks established single-step baselines tailored for these architectures, leaving MIA for audio models untested. Furthermore, while our framework is conceptually compatible with restricted setups, our current empirical evaluations rely on gray-box access to exact next-token logits, meaning that strictly black-box MIA remains untested in our work. Operationally, the primary limitation of our method is its scalability; the iterative regeneration loop inherently introduces a linear computational overhead by requiring multiple forward passes per sample. From a theoretical perspective, our core assumptions A1 and A3 are only partially satisfied in practice, as demonstrated by the empirical measurements in Table~2. Finally, our evaluations may be susceptible to distribution-shift confounds---where trajectory differences might stem from inherent dataset mismatches rather than pure memorization---and the exploratory findings presented in Section~5.6 are based on preliminary small-$n$ evidence that will require larger-scale validation in future work.\n\n\\section{LLM Usage}\nLarge language models were used to improve the readability and clarity of portions of the manuscript, as well as to provide feedback during the writing and revision process. The authors verified all technical statements, citations, and claims and take full responsibility for the final content.\n\n\\section{Method Overview}\n\\label{app:method}\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/madremia_teaser_v1_method.pdf}\n \\caption{%\n \\textbf{MADreMIA amplifies membership signal via trajectory features.}\n Left: both methods share the same suspect sample $Z_0$ and base features $z_{\\mathrm{base}}=\\phi(Z_0)$.\n Top: baseline one-shot MIA uses no trajectory add-on and yields weak member/non-member separability.\n Bottom: MADreMIA adds trajectory features $z_{\\mathrm{traj}}=\\psi(Z_0,\\ldots,Z_T)$ from chained regeneration.\n Members exhibit \\emph{consistent} trajectories (slow drift from $Z_0$), whereas non-members drift \\emph{inconsistently}.\n The fused representation $\\tilde{z}=[z_{\\mathrm{base}}\\|z_{\\mathrm{traj}}]$ is scored by the same plug-in estimator $h$ (e.g., L1-regularized logistic regression), amplifying the attack signal without changing the scorer.%\n }\n \\label{fig:madremia-teaser}\n\\end{figure}\n\n% \\begin{figure}[h]\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=0.8\\textwidth]{figures/madremia_teaser_v1_method.pdf}\n% \\caption{\\textbf{MADreMIA: add-on chained regeneration features to strengthen the membership signal for generative models.} It is cross-modal, and method type-agnostic: can be used for white-, grey- and black- box MIA methods.} \n% \\end{figure}\n\n\\section{Extended Related Works}\n\\label{app:related}\nOur work builds upon three intersecting lines of prior research: the characterization of data memorization in generative models, the evolution of membership inference, and the dynamics of model collapse during recursive generation.\n\n\\subsection{Memorization}\nMemorization — the tendency of generative models to reproduce training examples rather than generate novel samples — has been studied across multiple model families and from both measurement and mitigation perspectives. \\citet{burg2021memorization1} formalized the problem for probabilistic generative models such as VAEs, showing that memorization differs fundamentally from mode collapse and overfitting and is not captured by commonly-used nearest-neighbor tests. For diffusion models, \\citet{gu2023memorization4} show that the denoising score matching objective has a closed-form optimum that can only replicate training samples, and introduces the EMM metric to quantify how dataset size and model configuration govern the generalization-to-memorization transition. \\citet{sakarvadia2024memorization3} localize this phenomenon through bright-ending cross-attention patterns, while the sharpness-based framework of~\\citep{wen2024memorization6} justifies score-difference memorization metrics and proposes mitigation via sharpness-aware regularization of the initial noise. The benchmarking study~\\citep{bai2021memorization2} demonstrated that standard evaluation metrics fail to surface memorization even in competitive settings. Mitigation has been tackled both for LLMs, where \\citet{hans2024memorization5} propose the goldfish loss that excludes randomly sampled token subsets from the training objective to prevent verbatim reproduction, and for text-to-image diffusion models, where \\citet{Chen2025memorization7} address the privacy–utility tension by combining prompt re-anchoring with semantic prompt search to improve both dimensions simultaneously.\n\n\\subsection{Membership/Dataset Inference}\nA second line of work investigates whether specific examples or datasets can be identified from model behavior. Because individual Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) can be confounded by distribution shifts~\\citep{maini2024did}, recent literature often favors Dataset Inference (DI), which aggregates feature evidence across many samples to statistically detect training data usage~\\citep{maini2025reassessing,dubinski2025cdi,kowalczuk2025privacy}. Concurrently, individual MIA methods must adapt to increasingly restrictive black-box deployments. Furthermore, approaches based on training multiple shadow models to learn membership distributions~\\citep{ye2022enhanced,carlini2021zlib} are now computationally infeasible for massive modern architectures. Consequently, modern attacks must extract signals using only limited outputs rather than internal weights or gradients~\\citep{zhang2024minkpp,chang2025camia,tao2025informia}.\n\nIn these restricted settings, recent black-box attacks heavily rely on output variations. For example, \\citet{li2024towards} perform MIAs on diffusion models by repeatedly perturbing a target image via an API, averaging the results, and comparing them to the original sample. However, in an interrogation analogy, this approach merely asks multiple paraphrased versions of the exact same question. Because the target sample is perturbed independently each time, the query does not dynamically evolve in response to the model's previous answers, leaving deeper structural memorization unexploited.\n\n\\subsection{Model Collapse}\nThe last, but very important point is the literature on recursive self-training in generative models. \\citet{alemohammad2023mad} showed that self-consuming generative loops lead to progressive degradation in quality or diversity when insufficient fresh real data is injected at each generation, a phenomenon they term Model Autophagy Disorder. Their analysis is especially important for our setting because it frames repeated regeneration not as a neutral operation, but as a process that can magnify latent properties of the learned distribution. Closely related, \\citet{shumailov2024mad2} showed that recursively training on model-generated data causes model collapse, where tails of the original distribution disappear and learned behaviour drifts toward degenerate approximations. Taken together, these works suggest that iterative generation is structurally revealing: under repeated reuse, memorized or high-density regions may persist differently from non-member examples, while generic outputs may drift or collapse. Our method turns this insight into a privacy-auditing mechanism: rather than studying recursive generation as a training-time pathology, \\textbf{we exploit chained regeneration at inference time} to amplify membership-relevant differences.\n\n\\section{Model Details}\n\\label{app:model_details}\nIn our experiments, we consider two vision model families: image autoregressive models (IARs) and diffusion models. The IAR category includes VAR~\\cite{tian2024var} and RAR~\\cite{yu2024rar} variants, while the diffusion category includes DiT-MoE~\\cite{fei2024dit} and UViT-T2I~\\cite{bao2022uvit}. Furthermore, as others modalities, we evaluate large language models (LLMs) and voice conversion (VC) models. The LLMs include Pythia~\\cite{biderman2023pythia}, OLMo~\\cite{groeneveld2024olmo}, OPT~\\cite{zhang2022opt}, and Llama~\\cite{touvron2023llama}, while the VC models consist of AutoVC~\\cite{qian2019autovc} and FreeVC~\\cite{li2023freevc}. Across all settings, we focus on representative, high-performing model variants.\n\n\\vspace{-0.2cm}\n\\begin{table*}[h!]\n \\centering\n \\caption{Vision model details.}\n \\label{tab:vision_model_details}\n \\tiny\n \\begin{tabular}{lccccccccc}\n \\toprule\n & \\multicolumn{6}{c}{\\textbf{IAR Models}} & \\multicolumn{3}{c}{\\textbf{Diffusion Models}} \\\\\n \\cmidrule(r){2-7} \\cmidrule(r){8-10}\n & VAR-d30 & VAR-d24 & VAR-d20 & RAR-XXL & RAR-XL & RAR-L\n & DiT-MoE-G & DiT-MoE-XL & UViT-T2I-Deep \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\textbf{Model parameters} & 2.1B & 1.0B & 600M & 1.5B & 955M & 462M & 16.5B & 4.1B & 141M \\\\\n \\textbf{Training epochs} & 350 & 300 & 250 & 400 & 400 & 400 & — & — & — \\\\\n \\textbf{FID} & 1.92 & 2.33 & 2.95 & 1.48 & 1.50 & 1.70 & 1.72 & 2.10 & 5.48 \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\\vspace{-0.4cm}\n\n\\begin{table*}[h]\n\\centering\n\n\\begin{minipage}[h]{0.45\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\vspace{0pt}\n \\captionof{table}{Language model details.}\n \\label{tab:llm_model_details}\n \\tiny\n \\begin{tabular}{l c c c c}\n \\toprule\n & \\textbf{OLMo} & \\textbf{Llama} & \\textbf{Pythia} & \\textbf{OPT} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\textbf{Model parameters} & 7B & 13B & 6.9B & 6.7B \\\\\n \\textbf{Training tokens} & 2.46T & 1T & 300B & 180B \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\hfill\n\\begin{minipage}[h]{0.4\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\vspace{0pt}\n \\captionof{table}{Audio model details.}\n \\label{tab:audio_model_details}\n \\tiny\n \\begin{tabular}{l c c}\n \\toprule\n & \\textbf{AutoVC} & \\textbf{FreeVC} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\textbf{Model parameters} & 28M & 39M \\\\\n \\textbf{Training data (hours)} & 44 & 40 \\\\\n \\textbf{SMOS (seen-to-seen)} & 3.5 & 4.1 \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n\\end{minipage}\n\n\\end{table*}\n\\vspace{-0.3cm}\n\n\\section{Dataset Details}\n\\label{app:dataset_details}\nFor vision and audio models that have publicly known and available train/test splits we use these datasets. For most LLMs we use established MIA benchmarks (e.g. WikiMIA), but for OLMo, we use their corresponding training sets and the Global News as non-member set, as suggested in~\\cite{zawalski2026codec}.\n\\vspace{-0.3cm}\n\n\\begin{table}[h!]\n \\centering\n \\caption{Datasets used to construct member and non-member sets for each model family in our experiments, spanning vision, language, and speech domains.}\n \\label{tab:data_details}\n \\small\n \\begin{tabular}{lcc}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Model} & \\textbf{Members} & \\textbf{Non-members} \\\\\n \\midrule\n VAR & ImageNet~\\cite{deng2009imagenet} & ImageNet \\\\\n RAR & ImageNet & ImageNet \\\\\n % MAR & ImageNet & ImageNet \\\\\n DiT-MoE & ImageNet & ImageNet \\\\\n UViT-T2I & COCO~\\cite{veit2016coco} & COCO \\\\\n \\midrule\n % Mamba & WikiMIA~\\cite{shi2023wikimia} & WikiMIA \\\\\n % GPT-Neox & The Pile~\\cite{gao2020pile} & Global News \\\\\n Pythia & Mimir~\\cite{duan2024mimir} & Mimir \\\\\n OLMo & Dolma~\\cite{soldaini2024dolma} & Global News \\\\\n Llama & WikiMIA & WikiMIA \\\\\n OPT & WikiMIA & WikiMIA \\\\\n \\midrule\n AutoVC & VCTK~\\cite{yamagishi2019vctk} & LibriTTS~\\cite{zen2019libritts} \\\\\n FreeVC & VCTK & LibriTTS \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\nImportantly, for the Pythia-6.9B we use the Mimir dataset~\\citep{duan2024mimir} which consists of 6 subsets: \\textit{arxiv}, \\textit{dm\\_mathematics}, \\textit{github}, \\textit{hackernews}, \\textit{pubmed\\_central}, and \\textit{wikipedia\\_(en)}. We concatenate all these subsets and randomly select samples from the pool. We use the \\textit{ngram\\_7\\_0.2} data split. For the rest of the models, we employ their corresponding datasets' train split as members and val/test split as nonmembers.\n\n\n\\section{Metrics Details}\n\\label{app:metrics}\nThe following metrics are computed over the sequence of model outputs collected across MADreMIA iterations, capturing how the model's generative behavior evolves under repeated generation.\n\n\\subsection{Features for Language Models}\n\n\\begin{description}\n\\item[Jaccard Similarity:]\nMeasures the lexical overlap between the model's output at a given iteration and its initial response, computed over trigrams. A high Jaccard similarity indicates that the model rigidly reproduces the same surface forms across iterations, which is characteristic of memorized content.\n\\[\nJ(A,B) = \\frac{|A \\cap B|}{|A \\cup B|}\n\\]\n\\item[Token Diversity:]\nQuantifies the divergence between the token probability distribution at the current iteration $P$ and the initial distribution $Q$. Large values indicate that the model's vocabulary preferences shift substantially during reconstruction, reflecting instability in its output distribution.\n\\[\n D_{KL}(P \\parallel Q) = \\sum_{x \\in \\mathcal{X}} P(x) \\log \\left( \\frac{P(x)}{Q(x)} \\right)\n\\]\n\n\\item[Token Distribution Shift:]\nWe define it as a Jensen-Shannon Divergence, which is a symmetric and bounded variant of KLD that measures the distributional distance between $P$ and $Q$ via their mixture $M$. Compared to KLD, JSD is well-defined even when the supports of $P$ and $Q$ do not fully overlap, making it a more numerically stable measure of distributional drift across iterations.\n\\begin{align*}\n \\mathrm{JSD}(P \\parallel Q) &= \\frac{1}{2} D_{KL}(P \\parallel M) + \\frac{1}{2} D_{KL}(Q \\parallel M) \\\\\n \\text{where } M &= \\frac{1}{2}(P + Q) \\nonumber\n\\end{align*}\n\n\\item[Predictive Entropy:]\nMeasures the uncertainty of the model's next-token distribution over the full vocabulary $\\mathcal{V}$. Low entropy indicates that the model assigns high probability mass to a single token — consistent with confident, memorized reproduction — whereas high entropy reflects diffuse, uncertain predictions.\n\\begin{equation*}\n H(Y \\mid \\mathbf{x}) = - \\sum_{c \\in \\mathcal{V}} P(y=c \\mid \\mathbf{x}) \\log P(y=c \\mid \\mathbf{x})\n\\end{equation*}\n\n\\item[Margin:]\nCaptures the decisiveness of the model's token predictions by computing the difference in probability between the top-ranked and second-ranked tokens. A large margin indicates high confidence in a specific token, which may signal memorized recall, while a small margin reflects genuine uncertainty between competing continuations.\n\\begin{equation*}\n M = P(\\hat{y}_1 \\mid \\mathbf{x}) - P(\\hat{y}_2 \\mid \\mathbf{x})\n\\end{equation*}\n\\end{description}\n\n\\subsection{Features for Vision Models}\n\n\\begin{description}\n\\item[Mean Squared Error (MSE):]\nMeasures the average pixel-level reconstruction error between the generated image at a given iteration and the original input. Lower MSE indicates that the model consistently reproduces fine-grained pixel details across iterations, which is a strong signal of memorization.\n\\[\n\\mathrm{MSE}(x, \\hat{x}) = \\frac{1}{N} \\sum_{i=1}^{N} \\left( x_i - \\hat{x}_i \\right)^2\n\\]\n\\item[Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM)~\\citep{wang2004ssim}:]\nEvaluates perceptual similarity between the reconstructed image $\\hat{x}$ and the original $x$ by jointly comparing luminance, contrast, and structural information across local image patches. Unlike MSE, SSIM is sensitive to perceptual distortions that are meaningful to human observers, and its stability across iterations serves as a complementary signal to pixel-level metrics.\n\\[\n\\mathrm{SSIM}(x, \\hat{x}) = \\frac{(2\\mu_x \\mu_{\\hat{x}} + c_1)(2\\sigma_{x\\hat{x}} + c_2)}{(\\mu_x^2 + \\mu_{\\hat{x}}^2 + c_1)(\\sigma_x^2 + \\sigma_{\\hat{x}}^2 + c_2)}\n\\]\nwhere $\\mu_x$, $\\mu_{\\hat{x}}$ are local means, $\\sigma_x^2$, $\\sigma_{\\hat{x}}^2$ are local variances, $\\sigma_{x\\hat{x}}$ is the cross-covariance, and $c_1$, $c_2$ are stabilization constants.\n\n\\item[Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS)~\\citep{zhang2018lpips}:]\nQuantifies perceptual dissimilarity between $x$ and $\\hat{x}$ using deep feature representations extracted from a pretrained network $\\phi$. By operating in a learned feature space rather than pixel space, LPIPS captures high-level semantic and textural differences that are invisible to MSE or SSIM, making it particularly sensitive to cases where a model reproduces semantic content while varying low-level details.\n\\[\n\\mathrm{LPIPS}(x, \\hat{x}) = \\sum_{l} \\frac{1}{H_l W_l} \\sum_{h,w} \\left\\| w_l \\odot \\left( \\phi_l(x)_{hw} - \\phi_l(\\hat{x})_{hw} \\right) \\right\\|_2^2\n\\]\nwhere $\\phi_l$ denotes the feature map at layer $l$ of the pretrained network and $w_l$ are learned channel-wise weights.\n\\end{description}\n\n\n\\section{Additional Dataset Inference Results}\n\\Cref{fig:di-additional} extends our dataset inference evaluation to Llama-13B and VAR-d30. On Llama-13B, augmented variants reach the 95\\% confidence threshold faster than the baseline, with the Combined and Quality signals leading, though convergence is noisier at low sample counts. On VAR-d30, the benefit is more pronounced: augmented variants cross the threshold at roughly 100 samples compared to over 200 for the baseline, with all three signal types outperforming it consistently. The significance histograms corroborate these findings — the Combined variant shifts the $-\\log_{10}(p)$ distribution rightward on both models, confirming that trajectory features yield stronger per-trial evidence.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n\n % ---------- Row 1 ----------\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/di/di_success_rates_llama.pdf}\n \\caption{Llama-13B}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/di/di_success_rates_VAR.pdf}\n \\caption{VAR-d30}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\vspace{0.6em}\n\n % ---------- Row 2 ----------\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/di/di_distribution_ecdf_llama.pdf}\n \\caption{Llama-13B}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.49\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/di/di2_distribution_ecdf_VAR.pdf}\n \\caption{VAR-d30}\n \\end{subfigure}\n\n \\caption{DI performance on additional models.}\n \\label{fig:di-additional}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\section{Precision and Recall for Generative Models}\n\\label{app:rpc}\n\\Cref{fig:prec-rec} shows Precision and Recall across iterations for VAR-d30 and DiT-MoE-XL. In both models and both metrics, members consistently score higher than non-members throughout all iterations, confirming that the membership signal is stable and model-agnostic. Notably, the gap between members and non-members widens as iterations progress, indicating that chained regeneration amplifies the underlying asymmetry rather than merely preserving it.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n\n % ---------- Row 1 ----------\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.24\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/rpc/rec_var_30.pdf}\n \\caption{VAR-d30 (Rec.)}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.24\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/rpc/prec_var_30.pdf}\n \\caption{VAR-d30 (Prec.)}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.24\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/rpc/rec_dit_xl.pdf}\n \\caption{DiT-MoE-XL (Rec.)}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.24\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/rpc/prec_dit_xl.pdf}\n \\caption{DiT-MoE-XL (Prec.)}\n \\end{subfigure}\n\n \\caption{Precision and Recall across models.}\n \\label{fig:prec-rec}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\section{Getty Images Case}\n\\label{app:getty}\nAs a practical case study, we consider the Getty Images v.~Stability AI dispute~\\cite{coulter2024gettyvsstabilityai} and evaluate whether chained regeneration can distinguish images that are plausibly associated with the Stable Diffusion training distribution from images that are very unlikely to have been included. We use Stable Diffusion~1.5 as the target model. For the positive pool, we extract 2{,}000 images from LAION-2B whose metadata contains the string \\textit{gettyimages} and treat them as \\textit{members}. For the negative pool, we collect 2{,}000 images from the Getty Images website whose upload date is after January~1,~2025, and treat them as \\textit{non-members}. Because these images post-date the original Stable Diffusion~1.5 training era (late 2022), they provide a conservative practical control group for this experiment.\n\n\\begin{figure}[h]\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.48\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/getty_ssim.pdf}\n \\caption{SSIM $(\\uparrow)$}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.48\\columnwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{figures/getty_mse.pdf}\n \\caption{Reconstruction Error (MSE) $(\\downarrow)$}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption{Evolution of (a) SSIM and (b) Reconstruction Error over 15 chained regeneration steps. The solid lines indicate the mean values for training members (blue) and held-out non-members (red), with shaded regions representing standard deviation. Across both metrics, members exhibit higher structural fidelity and slower degradation than non-members.}\n \\label{fig:getty}\n\\end{figure}\n\nFor each pool, we run the same chained-regeneration procedure for 15 iterations and summarize the trajectories with SSIM and reconstruction error (MSE) (see \\Cref{fig:getty}). The SSIM plot measures whether regenerations remain structurally closer to the initial query for the member pool than for the non-member pool. The MSE plot provides a complementary pixel-level view across regeneration depth by measuring how quickly reconstructed samples drift away from their reference images. In our experiments, the two pools remain visibly separated under both SSIM and MSE. We do not use FID in this case, because it is very unstable on 2{,}000-image pools. We still interpret MSE conservatively: it is sensitive to low-level reconstruction error rather than semantic fidelity alone. For this reason, we use MSE as a stable auxiliary trajectory measure across iterations, while SSIM remains the more directly interpretable structural signal in this case study.\n\n\\section{Proofs for Section~\\ref{sec:general-theory}}\n\\label{app:proofs-general-theory}\n\n\\subsection{Proof of Theorem~\\ref{thm:trajectory-amplification}}\n\n\\noindent\\textit{Proof.}\nBy definition,\n\\[\n\\E[S_T\\mid M=m]=\\frac1T\\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\\E[\\phi_t\\mid M=m],\\qquad m\\in\\{0,1\\}.\n\\]\nHence\n\\[\n\\E[S_T\\mid1]-\\E[S_T\\mid0]\n=\\frac1T\\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\\Big(\\E[\\phi_t\\mid1]-\\E[\\phi_t\\mid0]\\Big).\n\\]\nUnder A1,\n\\[\n\\E[\\phi_t\\mid1]-\\E[\\phi_t\\mid0]\\ge \\Delta_t\\ge0,\\quad \\forall t,\n\\]\nso\n\\[\n\\E[S_T\\mid1]-\\E[S_T\\mid0]\\ge \\frac1T\\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\\Delta_t\\ge0.\n\\]\nTherefore\n\\[\n\\Gamma_T:=\\big|\\E[S_T\\mid1]-\\E[S_T\\mid0]\\big|\n\\ge \\frac1T\\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\\Delta_t.\n\\]\nFor the denominator, A3 gives, for each class $m$,\n\\[\n\\Var(S_T\\mid M=m)\\le C\\frac{\\sigma^2\\tau_{\\mathrm{eff}}}{T}.\n\\]\nHence\n\\[\n\\max_m \\Var(S_T\\mid M=m)\\le C\\frac{\\sigma^2\\tau_{\\mathrm{eff}}}{T}.\n\\]\nCombining with the lower bound on $\\Gamma_T$,\n\\[\n\\mathrm{SNR}^2(S_T)\n=\\frac{\\Gamma_T^2}{\\max_m\\Var(S_T\\mid M=m)}\n\\ge\n\\frac{\\left(\\frac1T\\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\\Delta_t\\right)^2}\n{C\\sigma^2\\tau_{\\mathrm{eff}}/T}.\n\\]\nThis proves Theorem~\\ref{thm:trajectory-amplification}. \\qed\n\n\\subsection{Proof of Corollary~\\ref{cor:exp-leakage}}\n\n\\noindent\\textit{Proof.}\nAssume $\\Delta_t=\\Delta_0e^{-t/\\tau_g}$. Then\n\\[\n\\frac1T\\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\\Delta_t\n=\\frac{\\Delta_0}{T}\\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}e^{-t/\\tau_g}\n=\\frac{\\Delta_0}{T}\\cdot\\frac{1-e^{-T/\\tau_g}}{1-e^{-1/\\tau_g}}.\n\\]\nSince $1-e^{-u}\\le u$ for $u>0$, with $u=1/\\tau_g$ we get\n\\[\n1-e^{-1/\\tau_g}\\le \\frac1{\\tau_g}\n\\quad\\Longrightarrow\\quad\n\\frac1{1-e^{-1/\\tau_g}}\\ge \\tau_g.\n\\]\nTherefore\n\\[\n\\frac1T\\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\\Delta_t\n\\ge\n\\Delta_0\\frac{1-e^{-T/\\tau_g}}{T/\\tau_g}.\n\\]\nBy Theorem~\\ref{thm:trajectory-amplification},\n\\[\n\\mathrm{SNR}^2(S_T)\\ge\n\\frac{\\left(\\frac1T\\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\\Delta_t\\right)^2}\n{C\\sigma^2\\tau_{\\mathrm{eff}}/T}\n\\;\\gtrsim\\;\n\\frac{\\Delta_0^2\\tau_g}{\\sigma^2\\tau_{\\mathrm{eff}}}\\,g(x),\n\\]\nwhere\n\\[\ng(x):=\\frac{(1-e^{-x})^2}{x},\\qquad x:=T/\\tau_g,\n\\]\nand $\\gtrsim$ absorbs only $T$-independent constants (including $1/C$ and comparability constants).\n\nTo optimize the shape in $x$, differentiate:\n\\[\ng'(x)=\\frac{(1-e^{-x})\\big(2xe^{-x}-(1-e^{-x})\\big)}{x^2}.\n\\]\nFor $x>0$, critical points satisfy\n\\[\n2xe^{-x}=1-e^{-x}\n\\quad\\Longleftrightarrow\\quad\ne^x=2x+1.\n\\]\nThis has a unique positive solution $x^\\star\\approx1.2564$, so the surrogate shape is maximized at\n\\[\nT^\\star\\approx x^\\star\\tau_g\\approx1.2564\\,\\tau_g.\n\\]\n\\qed\n\n\\subsection{Proof of Corollary~\\ref{cor:sqrt-kappa} (shape-constant clarification)}\n\n\\noindent\\textit{Proof.}\nFrom the previous corollary (under the same comparability regime),\n\\[\n\\mathrm{SNR}^2(S_{T^\\star})\n\\gtrsim\n\\frac{\\Delta_0^2\\tau_g}{\\sigma^2\\tau_{\\mathrm{eff}}}\\,g(x^\\star).\n\\]\nAssume additionally\n\\[\n\\Gamma_1\\asymp \\Delta_0,\\qquad\n\\Var(S_1\\mid M)\\asymp \\sigma^2,\n\\]\nso $\\mathrm{SNR}(S_1)\\asymp \\Delta_0/\\sigma$. Taking square roots and ratio:\n\\[\n\\frac{\\mathrm{SNR}(S_{T^\\star})}{\\mathrm{SNR}(S_1)}\n\\gtrsim\n\\sqrt{g(x^\\star)}\\sqrt{\\frac{\\tau_g}{\\tau_{\\mathrm{eff}}}}\n=\nc_{\\mathrm{shape}}\\sqrt{\\kappa},\n\\]\nwhere\n\\[\n\\kappa:=\\frac{\\tau_g}{\\tau_{\\mathrm{eff}}},\\qquad\nc_{\\mathrm{shape}}:=\\sqrt{g(x^\\star)}\\approx0.638.\n\\]\nThus $c_{\\mathrm{shape}}$ is the idealized shape constant; additional model-dependent prefactors remain absorbed by $\\gtrsim$.\n\\qed\n\n\\subsection{Additional comments on Bayes-cap statement at the end of Section~\\ref{sec:general-theory}}\n\nIf membership is deterministic in the initial sample, $M=f(Z_0)$, then $H(M\\mid Z_0)=0$, so\n\\[\nI(M;Z_0)=H(M)-H(M\\mid Z_0)=H(M).\n\\]\nAlso, conditioning on $Z_0$ already determines $M$, hence\n\\[\nH(M\\mid Z_0,Z_{1:T})=0=H(M\\mid Z_0),\n\\]\nwhich implies\n\\[\nI(M;Z_{1:T}\\mid Z_0)=H(M\\mid Z_0)-H(M\\mid Z_0,Z_{1:T})=0.\n\\]\nTherefore, by the chain rule for mutual information,\n\\[\nI(M;Z_{0:T})=I(M;Z_0)+I(M;Z_{1:T}\\mid Z_0)=I(M;Z_0).\n\\]\nThus trajectory iteration cannot increase Bayes-optimal information; it can improve practical fixed-form statistics through variance reduction and temporal aggregation.\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% NOTES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n% \\newpage\n% \\section{Motivation}\n% 1. The New York Times vs OpenAI:~\\cite{NYT2023Complaint}\\\\\n% 2. Getty Images vs Stability AI:~\\cite{coulter2024gettyvsstabilityai}\\\\\n% 3. Andersen vs Stability AI:\\\\\n% \\url{https://copyrightalliance.org/andersen-v-stability-ai-copyright-case/} - nie wiem jak to zacytować\n\n\n\n% \\section{Old Theory}\n% \\subsection{Preliminaries}\n% We study the behavior of iterative regeneration as a stochastic dynamical system acting on the data space. Let $x_k\\in \\mathcal{X}$ denote the sample after $k$ regeneration steps. The model induces a residual stochastic map\n% \\begin{equation}\n% x_{k+1} = x_k + G_\\theta(x_k) + \\xi_k\n% \\end{equation}\n% where the deterministic drift $G_\\theta$ is $L$-Lipschitz, and $\\xi_k \\sim \\mathcal{N}(0, \\sigma^2 I)$ is independent stochastic noise. This viewpoint lets us analyze regeneration not as a single forward pass, but as a trajectory evolving over the data manifold.\n\n% A key intuition behind our theory is that the learned generator does not behave uniformly over $\\mathcal{X}$. Instead, training induces regions with qualitatively different dynamics. We therefore reason about the space topologically, partitioning it into regions according to how the induced map acts locally on points:\n\n% \\begin{assumption}[Memorization Basin]\n% \\label{assumption1}\n% For any point $x$ in the local neighborhood of a training fixed point $x^*\\in\\R^D$, the map satisfies a mean-square contraction:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\mathbb{E}\\left[\\|x_{k+1} - x^*\\|^2\\right] \\leq \\gamma^2 \\mathbb{E}\\left[\\|x_k - x^*\\|^2\\right] + \\sigma^2D\n% \\end{equation}\n% where $\\gamma < 1$.\n% \\end{assumption}\n\n% \\begin{assumption}[Dead Region]\n% \\label{assumption2}\n% For off-manifold test points in uninformative interpolating regions, the deterministic drift vanishes:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\|G_\\theta(x)\\| \\leq \\varepsilon_K\n% \\end{equation}\n% \\end{assumption}\n\n% \\begin{assumption}[Drift Region]\n% \\label{assumption3}\n% For test points in active, non-contractive regions, the drift maintains directional coherence. There exists a unit vector $u$ such that:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\langle G_\\theta(x_k), u \\rangle \\geq c_{\\mathrm{drift}} > 0\n% \\end{equation}\n% \\end{assumption}\n\n\n% \\subsection{Theoretical Guarantees}\n% These three regions imply qualitatively different \\emph{trajectory geometries} under iterative regeneration. In memorization basins, trajectories fluctuate locally around a fixed point due to stochastic contraction. In dead regions, motion is dominated by accumulated noise, leading to diffusive wandering. In drift regions, trajectories exhibit coherent directional motion and grow linearly over time.\n\n% To capture these geometric differences in a model-agnostic way, we study two simple statistics: the average step size (path energy) and the net displacement after $K$ steps. As we show next, these two observables are sufficient to separate the three regimes induced by the learned generator.\n\n% \\paragraph{Noise floor notation.}\n% Since $\\xi_k \\sim \\mathcal{N}(0, \\sigma^2 I_D)$, the expected step magnitude induced\n% by noise alone is\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\bar{\\sigma} \\;:=\\; \\mathbb{E}\\!\\left[\\|\\xi_k\\|\\right]\n% \\;=\\; \\sigma\\sqrt{D}\\,\n% \\frac{\\Gamma\\!\\left(\\tfrac{D+1}{2}\\right)}\n% {\\Gamma\\!\\left(\\tfrac{D}{2}\\right)\\sqrt{D}}\n% \\;\\in\\; \\left[\\sigma\\sqrt{D-1},\\; \\sigma\\sqrt{D}\\,\\right].\n% \\end{equation}\n% We use $\\bar{\\sigma}$ as the \\emph{noise floor} throughout; it satisfies\n% $\\bar{\\sigma} = \\Theta(\\sigma\\sqrt{D})$.\n\n% \\begin{theorem}\n% \\label{theorem}\n% Define the path energy $S_K$ and the net displacement $E_K$ over $K$ steps as:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% S_K = \\frac{1}{K}\\sum_{k=0}^{K-1} \\|x_{k+1} - x_k\\|\n% \\qquad \\text{and} \\qquad\n% E_K = \\|x_K - x_0\\|.\n% \\end{equation}\n% Then, for sufficiently large $K$, the expected observables satisfy:\n\n% \\begin{table}[h!]\n% \\centering\n% \\begin{tabular}{lll}\n% \\toprule\n% \\textbf{Region}\n% & $\\mathbb{E}[S_K]$\n% & $\\mathbb{E}[E_K]$ \\\\\n% \\midrule\n% Train Basin\n% & $\\bar{\\sigma} + \\mathcal{O}(K^{-1})$\n% & $\\mathcal{O}\\!\\left(\\dfrac{\\bar{\\sigma}}{\\sqrt{1-\\gamma^2}}\\right)$\n% \\emph{(Bounded)} \\\\[8pt]\n% Dead Zone\n% & $\\bar{\\sigma}$\n% & $\\bar{\\sigma}\\sqrt{K}$ \\\\[4pt]\n% Drift Zone\n% & $\\geq \\bar{\\sigma} + c_{\\mathrm{drift}}$\n% & $\\geq c_{\\mathrm{drift}}\\,K$ \\\\\n% \\bottomrule\n% \\end{tabular}\n% \\end{table}\n\n% \\noindent\n% Moreover, under the Lipschitz and bounded noise assumptions, both $S_K$ and\n% $E_K$ concentrate exponentially around their respective expectations.\n% \\end{theorem}\n\n% This theorem establishes that the orbit statistics obey fundamentally different growth laws across the three regions; this divergence with $K$ directly yields a simple threshold-based separation rule.\n\n% \\begin{corollary}[Separation Rule]\n% \\label{corollary}\n% There exist global thresholds $\\tau_S$ and $\\tau_E$ such that the logical condition:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\{E_K > \\tau_E\\} \\lor \\{S_K > \\tau_S\\}\n% \\end{equation}\n% strictly classifies non-members from members with probability $1 - \\exp(-\\Omega(K))$.\n% \\end{corollary}\n\n% In this section, we introduced a simple dynamical view of iterative regeneration and showed that it naturally breaks the space into three regimes: memorization basins, dead regions, and drift regions. We then used two basic trajectory statistics—path energy and net displacement—to capture how these regimes behave differently over time. This leads to a simple and provable thresholding rule that separates members from non-members based only on their long-run trajectory behavior. Overall, this provides the theoretical backbone for the empirical differences we observe in regeneration dynamics.\n\n% \\subsection{Proof of \\Cref{theorem}}\n% We evaluate the expected values and concentration bounds for the path energy $S_K = \\frac{1}{K}\\sum_{k=0}^{K-1} \\|x_{k+1} - x_k\\|$ and the net displacement $E_K = \\|x_K - x_0\\|$ across the three topological regimes.\n\n% \\begin{proof}[Part 1: The Train Basin]\n% Let $x^*\\in \\R^D$ be the memorized fixed point. Define the displacement $\\Delta_k = x_k - x^*$. By Assumption~\\ref{assumption1}, we have:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\mathbb{E}[\\|\\Delta_k\\|^2] \\leq \\gamma^2 \\mathbb{E}[\\|\\Delta_{k-1}\\|^2] + \\sigma^2 D\n% \\end{equation}\n% Unrolling this recursion from $k=0$ yields:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\mathbb{E}[\\|\\Delta_K\\|^2] \\leq \\gamma^{2K}\\|\\Delta_0\\|^2 + \\sigma^2 D \\sum_{j=0}^{K-1} \\gamma^{2j} \\leq \\gamma^{2K}\\|\\Delta_0\\|^2 + \\frac{\\sigma^2 D}{1 - \\gamma^2}\n% \\end{equation}\n% Applying the triangle inequality to the net displacement $E_K = \\|x_K - x_0\\|$, we introduce the fixed point $x^*$ to express the bound in terms of the state errors $\\Delta_k$:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% E_K = \\|(x_K - x^*) - (x_0 - x^*)\\| \\leq \\|x_K - x^*\\| + \\|x_0 - x^*\\| = \\|\\Delta_K\\| + \\|\\Delta_0\\|\n% \\end{equation}\n% Taking the expectation over the stochastic noise trajectory yields:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\mathbb{E}[E_K] \\leq \\mathbb{E}[\\|\\Delta_K\\|] + \\mathbb{E}[\\|\\Delta_0\\|]\n% \\end{equation}\n% Assuming the initial point $x_0$ is deterministic (or evaluating conditioned on a specific $x_0$), we have $\\mathbb{E}[\\|\\Delta_0\\|] = \\|\\Delta_0\\|$. To bound the expected norm of the final state error $\\mathbb{E}[\\|\\Delta_K\\|]$, we apply Jensen's inequality ($\\mathbb{E}[\\|Z\\|] \\leq \\sqrt{\\mathbb{E}[\\|Z\\|^2]}$):\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\mathbb{E}[\\|\\Delta_K\\|] \\leq \\sqrt{\\mathbb{E}\\left[\\|\\Delta_K\\|^2\\right]}\n% \\end{equation}\n% Substituting our unrolled variance bound from the stochastic contraction into the radical gives:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\mathbb{E}[\\|\\Delta_K\\|] \\leq \\sqrt{ \\gamma^{2K}\\|\\Delta_0\\|^2 + \\frac{\\sigma^2 D}{1 - \\gamma^2} }\n% \\end{equation}\n% To decouple the transient decay from the stationary noise floor, we apply the subadditivity property of the square root:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\mathbb{E}[\\|\\Delta_K\\|] \\leq \\sqrt{\\gamma^{2K}\\|\\Delta_0\\|^2} + \\sqrt{\\frac{\\sigma^2 D}{1 - \\gamma^2}} = \\gamma^K \\|\\Delta_0\\| + \\frac{\\sigma\\sqrt{D}}{\\sqrt{1-\\gamma^2}}\n% \\end{equation}\n% Combining this with our initial triangle inequality bound, we obtain the full finite-time expected displacement:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\mathbb{E}[E_K] \\leq (1 + \\gamma^K)\\|\\Delta_0\\| + \\frac{\\sigma\\sqrt{D}}{\\sqrt{1-\\gamma^2}}\n% \\end{equation}\n% Because the input $x_0$ is assumed to be within the local neighborhood of the memorization basin, $\\|\\Delta_0\\|$ is bounded. As the observation window $K$ grows large ($K \\to \\infty$), the transient term $\\gamma^K \\|\\Delta_0\\| \\to 0$. Thus, the expected displacement becomes strictly dominated by the local initial displacement and the stationary geometry of the basin, independent of $K$:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\mathbb{E}[E_K] \\leq \\|\\Delta_0\\| + \\mathcal{O}\\left( \\frac{\\sigma\\sqrt{D}}{\\sqrt{1-\\gamma^2}} \\right)\n% \\end{equation}\n% For $S_K$, notice that $x_{k+1} - x_k = G_\\theta(x_k) + \\xi_k$. Inside the contractive basin, $\\|G_\\theta(x_k)\\| \\to 0$ in expectation, meaning $\\mathbb{E}[\\|x_{k+1} - x_k\\|] = \\bar{\\sigma} + \\mathcal{O}(\\gamma^k)$. Averaging over $K$ steps yields $\\mathbb{E}[S_K] = \\bar{\\sigma} + \\mathcal{O}(K^{-1})$. \n\n% Under the strong local contraction (Lipschitz constant of the update map $L_0 < 1$), the sum of the sensitivities to the noise sequence $(\\xi_0, \\dots, \\xi_{K-1})$ is bounded by a geometric series. By the Gaussian Poincar\\'e inequality, $E_K$ and $S_K$ concentrate around their means with probability $1 - \\exp(-\\Omega(1))$ with respect to $K$.\n% \\end{proof}\n\n% \\vspace{1em}\n\n% \\begin{proof}[Part 2: The Dead Zone]\n% By Assumption~\\ref{assumption2}, $\\|G_\\theta(x_k)\\| \\leq \\varepsilon$ for all visited states. The trajectory expands as:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% x_K - x_0 = \\sum_{k=0}^{K-1} \\xi_k + \\sum_{k=0}^{K-1} G_\\theta(x_k)\n% \\end{equation}\n% The noise sum $\\Xi_K = \\sum_{k=0}^{K-1} \\xi_k$ is distributed as $\\mathcal{N}(0, K\\sigma^2 I_D)$. The expected norm of this Gaussian vector is $\\mathbb{E}[\\|\\Xi_K\\|] \\approx \\sigma\\sqrt{DK}$. Assuming $\\varepsilon \\ll \\sigma / \\sqrt{K}$, the deterministic drift is negligible, yielding $\\mathbb{E}[E_K] \\approx \\sigma\\sqrt{DK}$.\n\n% To rigorously establish exponential concentration for the net displacement $E_K = \\|\\Xi_K\\|$, we apply the Borell–TIS Gaussian concentration inequality. Since the trajectory in the Dead Zone is an unbiased random walk, the net noise vector is distributed as $\\Xi_K \\sim \\mathcal{N}(0, K\\sigma^2 I_D)$. \n\n% We can reparameterize this as $\\Xi_K = \\sigma\\sqrt{K} Z$, where $Z \\sim \\mathcal{N}(0, I_D)$ is a standard Gaussian vector. The Euclidean norm function $f(Z) = \\|\\sigma\\sqrt{K} Z\\|_2$ is Lipschitz continuous. By the reverse triangle inequality, the Lipschitz constant is $L = \\sigma\\sqrt{K}$. By the Borell–TIS inequality, the fluctuations of a Lipschitz function of a standard Gaussian vector are bounded by:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\mathbb{P}\\left( \\big|\\|\\Xi_K\\| - \\mathbb{E}[\\|\\Xi_K\\|]\\big| > t \\right) \\leq 2 \\exp\\left( - \\frac{t^2}{2L^2} \\right) = 2 \\exp\\left( - \\frac{t^2}{2K\\sigma^2} \\right)\n% \\end{equation}\n% Notably, while the expected displacement $\\mathbb{E}[E_K]$ scales with the state dimension $\\sqrt{D}$, the variance proxy $K\\sigma^2$ is dimension-free, guaranteeing tight concentration even in high-dimensional generative spaces.\n\n% Similarly, we evaluate the path energy $S_K = \\frac{1}{K} \\sum_{k=0}^{K-1} \\|\\xi_k\\|_2$. Each step magnitude $\\|\\xi_k\\|_2$ is a $1$-Lipschitz function of the scaled Gaussian $\\xi_k = \\sigma z_k$ (where $z_k \\sim \\mathcal{N}(0, I_D)$). Applying the Borell–TIS inequality again yields that each $\\|\\xi_k\\|_2$ is a sub-Gaussian random variable with variance proxy $\\nu^2 = \\sigma^2$. \n\n% Because $S_K$ is the empirical average of $K$ independent sub-Gaussian random variables, the variance proxy of the average scales inversely with $K$. Applying the general Hoeffding bound for sub-Gaussian variables yields:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\mathbb{P}\\left( \\big|S_K - \\mathbb{E}[S_K]\\big| > t \\right) \\leq 2 \\exp\\left( - \\frac{K t^2}{2\\sigma^2} \\right)\n% \\end{equation}\n% Since $\\mathbb{E}[S_K] = \\mathbb{E}[\\|\\xi_0\\|] \\approx \\sigma\\sqrt{D}$, this confirms that the path energy concentrates exponentially fast around its expected noise floor at a rate of $\\exp(-\\Omega(K))$.\n% \\end{proof}\n\n% \\vspace{1em}\n\n% \\begin{proof}[Part 3: The Drift Zone]\n% By Assumption~\\ref{assumption3}, there exists a unit vector $u$ such that $\\langle G_\\theta(x_k), u \\rangle \\geq c_{\\mathrm{drift}}$. We bound $E_K$ by projecting the displacement onto $u$:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% E_K = \\|x_K - x_0\\| \\geq \\langle x_K - x_0, u \\rangle = \\sum_{k=0}^{K-1} \\langle G_\\theta(x_k), u \\rangle + \\sum_{k=0}^{K-1} \\langle \\xi_k, u \\rangle\n% \\end{equation}\n% Taking the expectation, the noise term vanishes, leaving $\\mathbb{E}[E_K] \\geq c_{\\mathrm{drift}} K$. \n\n% The noise projection $\\sum \\langle \\xi_k, u \\rangle$ is a 1D Gaussian $\\mathcal{N}(0, K\\sigma^2)$. By standard Gaussian tail bounds, the probability that the displacement falls below half its expected trajectory $\\tau_E = \\frac{1}{2}c_{\\mathrm{drift}}K$ is:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\mathbb{P}\\left( E_K < \\frac{1}{2} c_{\\mathrm{drift}} K \\right) \\leq \\mathbb{P}\\left( \\mathcal{N}(0, K\\sigma^2) < -\\frac{1}{2} c_{\\mathrm{drift}} K \\right) \\leq \\exp\\left( - \\frac{c_{\\mathrm{drift}}^2 K}{8\\sigma^2} \\right)\n% \\end{equation}\n% This establishes strict exponential concentration $\\exp(-\\Omega(K))$. Identical logic applies to $S_K$, projecting each step onto $u$ to guarantee $\\mathbb{E}[S_K] \\geq c_{\\mathrm{drift}}$, which similarly concentrates via Hoeffding's inequality.\n% \\end{proof}\n\n\n% \\subsection{Proof of Corollary~\\ref{corollary}}\n% \\begin{proof}\n% We construct a composite logical classifier to identify non-members using the condition $\\{E_K > \\tau_E\\} \\lor \\{S_K > \\tau_S\\}$. \n\n% Let $\\mu_{dead} = \\sigma\\sqrt{DK}$ and $\\mu_{train}^{(E)} = \\mathcal{O}(1)$ be the expected net displacements in the Dead Zone and Train Basin, respectively. Let $\\bar{\\sigma} \\approx \\sigma\\sqrt{D}$ be the expected step size of the noise floor. We set the classification thresholds as follows:\n% \\begin{enumerate}\n% \\item $\\tau_S = \\bar{\\sigma} + \\frac{1}{2}c_{\\mathrm{drift}}$\n% \\item $\\tau_E = \\sigma \\sqrt{D K} - cK$, where $c > 0$ is a constant chosen such that $\\tau_E \\gg \\mu_{train}^{(E)}$. (Note: This requires $K \\ll D$, naturally holding in high-dimensional generative spaces).\n% \\end{enumerate}\n\n% We now bound the classification error probabilities for each topological regime.\n\n% \\textbf{Case 1: Memorized Member (Train Basin).} \n% A false positive occurs if the train orbit triggers either condition. \n% For the path energy, $\\mathbb{E}[S_K] \\leq \\bar{\\sigma} + \\mathcal{O}(K^{-1})$. For sufficiently large $K$, the margin to the threshold is $\\tau_S - \\mathbb{E}[S_K] \\approx \\frac{1}{2}c_{\\mathrm{drift}}$. Because $S_K$ is an average of $K$ independent sub-Gaussian step norms with variance proxy $\\sigma^2$, Hoeffding's bound yields:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\mathbb{P}(S_K > \\tau_S) \\leq \\exp\\left( - \\frac{K c_{\\mathrm{drift}}^2}{8\\sigma^2} \\right) = \\exp(-\\Omega(K))\n% \\end{equation}\n% For the net displacement, $\\mathbb{E}[E_K] = \\mathcal{O}(1)$. The threshold $\\tau_E$ scales as $\\mathcal{O}(\\sqrt{K})$. Thus, $\\tau_E - \\mathbb{E}[E_K] \\to \\infty$, and by the Gaussian Poincar\\'e inequality for the stationary basin, $\\mathbb{P}(E_K > \\tau_E)$ decays super-exponentially in $K$. By the union bound, the false positive rate is bounded by $\\exp(-\\Omega(K))$.\n\n% \\textbf{Case 2: Non-Member (Dead Zone).} \n% A true positive is guaranteed if $\\{E_K > \\tau_E\\}$ triggers. The expected displacement is $\\mu_{dead} = \\sigma\\sqrt{DK}$. The margin is $t_0 = \\mu_{dead} - \\tau_E = cK$. Applying the Borell-TIS inequality for the Lipschitz norm of the $K$-step random walk (where the Lipschitz constant is $L = \\sigma\\sqrt{K}$):\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\mathbb{P}(E_K \\leq \\tau_E) = \\mathbb{P}\\Big( E_K - \\mu_{dead} \\leq -cK \\Big) \\leq \\exp\\left( - \\frac{(cK)^2}{2(\\sigma\\sqrt{K})^2} \\right) = \\exp\\left( - \\frac{c^2 K}{2\\sigma^2} \\right) = \\exp(-\\Omega(K))\n% \\end{equation}\n% Thus, a Dead Zone non-member is correctly identified with high probability.\n\n% \\textbf{Case 3: Non-Member (Drift Zone).} \n% A true positive is guaranteed if $\\{S_K > \\tau_S\\}$ triggers. The expected path energy is $\\mathbb{E}[S_K] \\geq \\bar{\\sigma} + c_{\\mathrm{drift}}$. The margin is bounded below by $\\mathbb{E}[S_K] - \\tau_S \\geq \\frac{1}{2}c_{\\mathrm{drift}}$. Applying the sub-Gaussian Hoeffding bound for $S_K$:\n% \\begin{equation}\n% \\mathbb{P}(S_K \\leq \\tau_S) \\leq \\exp\\left( - \\frac{K c_{\\mathrm{drift}}^2}{8\\sigma^2} \\right) = \\exp(-\\Omega(K))\n% \\end{equation}\n\n% \\textbf{Conclusion.} \n% For any valid $K$ (before a non-member enters a Memorization Basin), the probability of misclassification in any of the three regimes is strictly bounded by terms of order $\\exp(-\\Omega(K))$. Therefore, the composite logical classifier strictly separates the regimes with high probability.\n% \\end{proof}\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.bib\n================================================\n@inproceedings{shokri2017mia,\n title={Membership inference attacks against machine learning models},\n author={Shokri, Reza and Stronati, Marco and Song, Congzheng and Shmatikov, Vitaly},\n booktitle={2017 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (SP)},\n pages={3--18},\n year={2017},\n organization={IEEE}\n}\n@article{maini2021di,\n title={Dataset inference: Ownership resolution in machine learning},\n author={Maini, Pratyush and Yaghini, Mohammad and Papernot, Nicolas},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.10706},\n year={2021}\n}\n@article{singh2024evaluation,\n title={Evaluation data contamination in LLMs: how do we measure it and (when) does it matter?},\n author={Singh, Aaditya K and Kocyigit, Muhammed Yusuf and Poulton, Andrew and Esiobu, David and Lomeli, Maria and Szilvasy, Gergely and Hupkes, Dieuwke},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03923},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@misc{NYT2023Complaint,\n author = {{The New York Times Company}},\n title = {Complaint},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://nytco-assets.nytimes.com/2023/12/NYT_Complaint_Dec2023.pdf}},\n note = {Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-11195, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York},\n year = {2023},\n month = dec\n}\n\n@article{coulter2024gettyvsstabilityai,\n title={Aiming for fairness: an exploration into getty images v. stability ai and its importance in the landscape of modern copyright law},\n author={Coulter, Matthew},\n journal={DePaul J. Art Tech. \\& Intell. Prop. L},\n volume={34},\n pages={124},\n year={2024},\n publisher={HeinOnline}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{alemohammad2023mad,\n title={Self-consuming generative models go mad},\n author={Alemohammad, Sina and Casco-Rodriguez, Josue and Luzi, Lorenzo and Humayun, Ahmed Imtiaz and Babaei, Hossein and LeJeune, Daniel and Siahkoohi, Ali and Baraniuk, Richard},\n booktitle={The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{dathathri2024watermarking,\n title={Scalable watermarking for identifying large language model outputs},\n author={Dathathri, Sumanth and See, Abigail and Ghaisas, Sumedh and Huang, Po-Sen and McAdam, Rob and Welbl, Johannes and Bachani, Vandana and Kaskasoli, Alex and Stanforth, Robert and Matejovicova, Tatiana and others},\n journal={Nature},\n volume={634},\n number={8035},\n pages={818--823},\n year={2024},\n publisher={Nature Publishing Group UK London}\n}\n\n@article{dohmatob2024collapsedemy,\n title={Model collapse demystified: The case of regression},\n author={Dohmatob, Elvis and Feng, Yুনzhen and Kempe, Julia},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={37},\n pages={46979--47013},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{xing2025aiautophagy,\n title={On the caveats of AI autophagy},\n author={Xing, Xiaodan and Shi, Fadong and Huang, Jiahao and Wu, Yinzhe and Nan, Yang and Zhang, Sheng and Fang, Yingying and Roberts, Michael and Sch{\\\"o}nlieb, Carola-Bibiane and Del Ser, Javier and others},\n journal={Nature Machine Intelligence},\n volume={7},\n number={2},\n pages={172--180},\n year={2025},\n publisher={Nature Publishing Group UK London}\n}\n\n@article{shumailov2024mad2,\n author = {Shumailov, Ilia and Shumaylov, Zakhar and Zhao, Yiren and Papernot, Nicolas and Anderson, Ross and Gal, Yarin},\n year = {2024},\n month = {07},\n pages = {755-759},\n title = {AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data},\n volume = {631},\n journal = {Nature},\n doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-07566-y}\n}\n\n@article{li2024towards,\n author = {Li, Jingwei and Dong, Jing and He, Tianxing and Zhang, Jingzhao},\n title = {Towards Black-Box Membership Inference Attack for Diffusion Models},\n journal = {CoRR},\n volume = {abs/2405.20771},\n year = {2024},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2405.20771},\n eprint = {2405.20771},\n archivePrefix = {arXiv},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.20771}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{burg2021memorization1,\n author = {van den Burg, Gerrit and Williams, Chris},\n booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n editor = {M. Ranzato and A. Beygelzimer and Y. Dauphin and P.S. Liang and J. Wortman Vaughan},\n pages = {27916--27928},\n publisher = {Curran Associates, Inc.},\n title = {On Memorization in Probabilistic Deep Generative Models},\n url = {https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2021/file/eae15aabaa768ae4a5993a8a4f4fa6e4-Paper.pdf},\n volume = {34},\n year = {2021}\n}\n@inproceedings{bai2021memorization2,\n author = {Bai, Ching-Yuan and Lin, Hsuan-Tien and Raffel, Colin and Kan, Wendy Chi-wen},\n title = {On Training Sample Memorization: Lessons from Benchmarking Generative Modeling with a Large-scale Competition},\n year = {2021},\n isbn = {9781450383325},\n publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},\n address = {New York, NY, USA},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3447548.3467198},\n doi = {10.1145/3447548.3467198},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery \\& Data Mining},\n pages = {2534–2542},\n numpages = {9},\n keywords = {neural networks, memorization, generative models, datasets, computer vision, competition, benchmark},\n location = {Virtual Event, Singapore},\n series = {KDD '21}\n}\n@inproceedings{sakarvadia2024memorization3,\n title={Mitigating memorization in language models},\n author={Sakarvadia, Mansi and Ajith, Aswathy and Khan, Arham Mushtaq and Hudson, Nathaniel C and Geniesse, Caleb and Chard, Kyle and Yang, Yaoqing and Foster, Ian and Mahoney, Michael W},\n booktitle={The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations},\n year={2024}\n}\n@article{gu2023memorization4,\n title={On memorization in diffusion models},\n author={Gu, Xiangming and Du, Chao and Pang, Tianyu and Li, Chongxuan and Lin, Min and Wang, Ye},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02664},\n year={2023}\n}\n@article{hans2024memorization5,\n title={Be like a goldfish, don't memorize! mitigating memorization in generative llms},\n author={Hans, Abhimanyu and Wen, Yuxin and Jain, Neel and Kirchenbauer, John and Kazemi, Hamid and Singhania, Prajwal and Singh, Siddharth and Somepalli, Gowthami and Geiping, Jonas and Bhatele, Abhinav and others},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={37},\n pages={24022--24045},\n year={2024}\n}\n@inproceedings{\n wen2024memorization6,\n title={Detecting, Explaining, and Mitigating Memorization in Diffusion Models},\n author={Yuxin Wen and Yuchen Liu and Chen Chen and Lingjuan Lyu},\n booktitle={The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations},\n year={2024},\n url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=84n3UwkH7b}\n}\n@article{Chen2025memorization7,\n title={Enhancing Privacy-Utility Trade-offs to Mitigate Memorization in Diffusion Models},\n author={Chen Chen and Daochang Liu and Mubarak Shah and Chang Xu},\n journal={2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},\n year={2025},\n pages={8182-8191},\n url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:278129333}\n}\n\n@article{huang2026repromia,\n author = {Huang, Chihan and Wang, Huaijin and Wang, Shuai},\n title = {{ReproMIA}: A Comprehensive Analysis of Model Reprogramming for Proactive Membership Inference Attacks},\n journal = {CoRR},\n volume = {abs/2603.28942},\n year = {2026},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2603.28942},\n eprint = {2603.28942},\n archivePrefix = {arXiv},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.28942}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{ye2022enhanced,\n title={Enhanced membership inference attacks against machine learning models},\n author={Ye, Jiayuan and Maddi, Aadyaa and Murakonda, Sasi Kumar and Bindschaedler, Vincent and Shokri, Reza},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security},\n pages={3093--3106},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{carlini2021zlib,\n title={Extracting training data from large language models},\n author={Carlini, Nicholas and Tramer, Florian and Wallace, Eric and Jagielski, Matthew and Herbert-Voss, Ariel and Lee, Katherine and Roberts, Adam and Brown, Tom and Song, Dawn and Erlingsson, Ulfar and others},\n booktitle={30th USENIX security symposium (USENIX Security 21)},\n pages={2633--2650},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@article{yi2026simmia,\n author = {Yi, Jiatong and Li, Yanyang},\n title = {Membership Inference on {LLM}s in the Wild},\n journal = {CoRR},\n volume = {abs/2601.11314},\n year = {2026},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2601.11314},\n eprint = {2601.11314},\n archivePrefix = {arXiv},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.11314}\n}\n\n@article{maini2024did,\n author = {Maini, Pratyush and Jia, Hengrui and Papernot, Nicolas and Dziedzic, Adam},\n title = {{LLM} Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?},\n journal = {CoRR},\n volume = {abs/2406.06443},\n year = {2024},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2406.06443},\n eprint = {2406.06443},\n archivePrefix = {arXiv},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.06443}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{kaneko2025samia,\n author = {Kaneko, Masahiro and Ma, Youmi and Wata, Yuki and Okazaki, Naoaki},\n title = {Sampling-based Pseudo-Likelihood for Membership Inference Attacks},\n booktitle = {Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: {ACL} 2025},\n year = {2025},\n address = {Vienna, Austria},\n publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},\n pages = {8894--8907},\n doi = {10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.465},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.465}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{dubinski2025cdi,\n title={Cdi: Copyrighted data identification in diffusion models},\n author={Dubi{\\'n}ski, Jan and Kowalczuk, Antoni and Boenisch, Franziska and Dziedzic, Adam},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference},\n pages={18674--18684},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{chang2025camia,\n title={Context-aware membership inference attacks against pre-trained large language models},\n author={Chang, Hongyan and Shamsabadi, Ali Shahin and Katevas, Kleomenis and Haddadi, Hamed and Shokri, Reza},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing},\n pages={7299--7321},\n year={2025}\n}\n\n@article{shi2023mink,\n title={Detecting pretraining data from large language models},\n author={Shi, Weijia and Ajith, Anirudh and Xia, Mengzhou and Huang, Yangsibo and Liu, Daogao and Blevins, Terra and Chen, Danqi and Zettlemoyer, Luke},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16789},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{zhang2024minkpp,\n author = {Zhang, Jingyang and Sun, Jingwei and Yeats, Eric C. and Ouyang, Yang and Kuo, Martin and Zhang, Jianyi and Yang, Hao and Li, Hai Helen},\n title = {Min-{$k$}\\%++: Improved Baseline for Detecting Pre-Training Data from Large Language Models},\n journal = {CoRR},\n volume = {abs/2404.02936},\n year = {2024},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2404.02936},\n eprint = {2404.02936},\n archivePrefix = {arXiv},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.02936}\n}\n@inproceedings{choquette2021labelonlymia,\n title={Label-only membership inference attacks},\n author={Choquette-Choo, Christopher A and Tramer, Florian and Carlini, Nicholas and Papernot, Nicolas},\n booktitle={International conference on machine learning},\n pages={1964--1974},\n year={2021},\n organization={PMLR}\n}\n@inproceedings{wu2024yoqo,\n title={You Only Query Once: An Efficient Label-Only Membership Inference Attack},\n author={YUTONG WU and Han Qiu and Shangwei Guo and Jiwei Li and Tianwei Zhang},\n booktitle={The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations},\n year={2024},\n url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=7WsivwyHrS}\n}\n\n@article{zhang2022healthmia,\n title={Membership inference attacks against synthetic health data},\n author={Zhang, Ziqi and Yan, Chao and Malin, Bradley A},\n journal={Journal of biomedical informatics},\n volume={125},\n pages={103977},\n year={2022},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{tao2025informia,\n author = {Tao, Jiashu and Shokri, Reza},\n title = {(Token-Level) {InfoRMIA}: Stronger Membership Inference and Memorization Assessment for {LLM}s},\n journal = {CoRR},\n volume = {abs/2510.05582},\n year = {2025},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2510.05582},\n eprint = {2510.05582},\n archivePrefix = {arXiv},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.05582}\n}\n\n@article{Gerstgrasser2024IsMC,\n title={Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Data},\n author={Matthias Gerstgrasser and Rylan Schaeffer and Apratim Dey and Rafael Rafailov and Henry Sleight and John Hughes and Tomasz Korbak and Rajashree Agrawal and Dhruv Pai and Andrey Gromov and Daniel A. Roberts and Diyi Yang and David L. Donoho and Oluwasanmi Koyejo},\n journal={ArXiv},\n year={2024},\n volume={abs/2404.01413},\n url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:268856698}\n}\n\n@article{Barzilai2025WhenNoCollapse,\n title={When Models Don't Collapse: On the Consistency of Iterative MLE},\n author={Daniel Barzilai and Ohad Shamir},\n journal={ArXiv},\n year={2025},\n volume={abs/2505.19046},\n url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:278905870}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{Yoon2024CollapseInDiff,\n title={Model Collapse in the Self-Consuming Chain of Diffusion Finetuning: A Novel Perspective from Quantitative Trait Modeling},\n author={Youngseok Yoon and Dai Lei Hu and Iain Xie Weissburg and Yao Qin and Haewon Jeong},\n year={2024},\n url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:271432427}\n}\n\n@article{Zhu2024SynthDataWithoutCollapse,\n title={How to Synthesize Text Data without Model Collapse?},\n author={Xuekai Zhu and Daixuan Cheng and Hengli Li and Kaiyan Zhang and Ermo Hua and Xingtai Lv and Ning Ding and Zhouhan Lin and Zilong Zheng and Bowen Zhou},\n journal={ArXiv},\n year={2024},\n volume={abs/2412.14689},\n url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:274859529}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{yeom2018privacy,\n title={Privacy risk in machine learning: Analyzing the connection to overfitting},\n author={Yeom, Samuel and Giacomelli, Irene and Fredrikson, Matt and Jha, Somesh},\n booktitle={2018 IEEE 31st computer security foundations symposium (CSF)},\n pages={268--282},\n year={2018},\n organization={IEEE}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{mcallester1998pac,\n title={PAC-Bayesian model averaging},\n author={McAllester, David A},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the twelfth annual conference on Computational learning theory},\n pages={164--170},\n year={1999}\n}\n\n@article{mcallester2003pacstochastic,\n title={PAC-Bayesian stochastic model selection},\n author={McAllester, David A},\n journal={Machine Learning},\n volume={51},\n number={1},\n pages={5--21},\n year={2003},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{shi2025lookmodelcollapse,\n title={A Closer Look at Model Collapse: From a Generalization-to-Memorization Perspective},\n author={Lianghe Shi and Meng Wu and Huijie Zhang and Zekai Zhang and Molei Tao and Qing Qu},\n journal={ArXiv},\n year={2025},\n volume={abs/2509.16499},\n url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:281421510}\n}\n\n@article{wang2004ssim,\n title={Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity},\n author={Wang, Zhou and Bovik, Alan C and Sheikh, Hamid R and Simoncelli, Eero P},\n journal={IEEE transactions on image processing},\n volume={13},\n number={4},\n pages={600--612},\n year={2004},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n@inproceedings{zhang2018lpips,\n title={The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric},\n author={Zhang, Richard and Isola, Phillip and Efros, Alexei A and Shechtman, Eli and Wang, Oliver},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition},\n pages={586--595},\n year={2018}\n}\n\n### MIA ###\n@inproceedings{\n zawalski2026codec,\n title={Detecting Data Contamination in {LLM}s via In-Context Learning},\n author={Micha{\\l} Zawalski and Meriem Boubdir and Klaudia Ba{\\l}azy and Besmira Nushi and Pablo Ribalta},\n booktitle={The Fourteenth International Conference on Learning Representations},\n year={2026},\n url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=YlpaaYxx4t}\n}\n@article{kong2023pia,\n title={An efficient membership inference attack for the diffusion model by proximal initialization},\n author={Kong, Fei and Duan, Jinhao and Ma, RuiPeng and Shen, Hengtao and Zhu, Xiaofeng and Shi, Xiaoshuang and Xu, Kaidi},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18355},\n year={2023}\n}\n@inproceedings{maini2025reassessing,\n title={Reassessing EMNLP 2024’s Best Paper: Does Divergence-Based Calibration for MIAs Hold Up?},\n author={Maini, Pratyush and Suri, Anshuman},\n booktitle={The Fourth Blogpost Track at ICLR 2025}\n}\n@inproceedings{kowalczuk2025privacy,\n title={Privacy Attacks on Image AutoRegressive Models},\n author={Antoni Kowalczuk and Jan Dubi{\\'n}ski and Franziska Boenisch and Adam Dziedzic},\n booktitle={Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learning},\n year={2025},\n url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=7SXXczJCWP}\n}\n\n\n### MODELS ###\n@misc{tian2024var,\n title={Visual Autoregressive Modeling: Scalable Image Generation via Next-Scale Prediction}, \n author={Keyu Tian and Yi Jiang and Zehuan Yuan and Bingyue Peng and Liwei Wang},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2404.02905},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02905}, \n}\n@misc{li2024mar,\n title={Autoregressive Image Generation without Vector Quantization}, \n author={Tianhong Li and Yonglong Tian and He Li and Mingyang Deng and Kaiming He},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2406.11838},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11838}, \n}\n\n@misc{yu2024rar,\n title={Randomized Autoregressive Visual Generation}, \n author={Qihang Yu and Ju He and Xueqing Deng and Xiaohui Shen and Liang-Chieh Chen},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2411.00776},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00776}, \n}\n@misc{fei2024dit,\n title={Scaling Diffusion Transformers to 16 Billion Parameters}, \n author={Zhengcong Fei and Mingyuan Fan and Changqian Yu and Debang Li and Junshi Huang},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2407.11633},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.CV},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11633}, \n}\n@inproceedings{bao2022uvit,\n title={All are Worth Words: A ViT Backbone for Diffusion Models},\n author={Bao, Fan and Nie, Shen and Xue, Kaiwen and Cao, Yue and Li, Chongxuan and Su, Hang and Zhu, Jun},\n booktitle = {CVPR},\n year={2023}\n}\n@article{zhang2022opt,\n title={Opt: Open pre-trained transformer language models},\n author={Zhang, Susan and Roller, Stephen and Goyal, Naman and Artetxe, Mikel and Chen, Moya and Chen, Shuohui and Dewan, Christopher and Diab, Mona and Li, Xian and Lin, Xi Victoria and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01068},\n year={2022}\n}\n@inproceedings{biderman2023pythia,\nauthor = {Biderman, Stella and Schoelkopf, Hailey and Anthony, Quentin and Bradley, Herbie and O'Brien, Kyle and Hallahan, Eric and Khan, Mohammad Aflah and Purohit, Shivanshu and Prashanth, USVSN Sai and Raff, Edward and Skowron, Aviya and Sutawika, Lintang and Van Der Wal, Oskar},\ntitle = {Pythia: a suite for analyzing large language models across training and scaling},\nyear = {2023},\npublisher = {JMLR.org},\nbooktitle = {Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning},\narticleno = {102},\nnumpages = {34},\nlocation = {, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, },\nseries = {ICML'23}\n}\n@article{touvron2023llama,\n title={Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models},\n author={Touvron, Hugo and Lavril, Thibaut and Izacard, Gautier and Martinet, Xavier and Lachaux, Marie-Anne and Lacroix, Timoth{\\'e}e and Rozi{\\`e}re, Baptiste and Goyal, Naman and Hambro, Eric and Azhar, Faisal and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971},\n year={2023}\n}\n@article{gu2023mamba,\n title={Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces},\n author={Gu, Albert and Dao, Tri},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00752},\n year={2023}\n}\n@inproceedings{black2022gptneox,\n title={Gpt-neox-20b: An open-source autoregressive language model},\n author={Black, Sidney and Biderman, Stella and Hallahan, Eric and Anthony, Quentin and Gao, Leo and Golding, Laurence and He, Horace and Leahy, Connor and McDonell, Kyle and Phang, Jason and others},\n booktitle={Proceedings of BigScience Episode\\# 5--Workshop on Challenges \\& Perspectives in Creating Large Language Models},\n pages={95--136},\n year={2022}\n}\n@inproceedings{groeneveld2024olmo,\n title={OLMo: Accelerating the science of language models},\n author={Groeneveld, Dirk and Beltagy, Iz and Walsh, Evan and Bhagia, Akshita and Kinney, Rodney and Tafjord, Oyvind and Jha, Ananya and Ivison, Hamish and Magnusson, Ian and Wang, Yizhong and others},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)},\n pages={15789--15809},\n year={2024}\n}\n@inproceedings{qian2019autovc,\n title={Autovc: Zero-shot voice style transfer with only autoencoder loss},\n author={Qian, Kaizhi and Zhang, Yang and Chang, Shiyu and Yang, Xuesong and Hasegawa-Johnson, Mark},\n booktitle={International Conference on Machine Learning},\n pages={5210--5219},\n year={2019},\n organization={PMLR}\n}\n@inproceedings{li2023freevc,\n title={Freevc: Towards high-quality text-free one-shot voice conversion},\n author={Li, Jingyi and Tu, Weiping and Xiao, Li},\n booktitle={ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)},\n pages={1--5},\n year={2023},\n organization={IEEE}\n}\n@article{heusel2017fid,\n title={Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium},\n author={Heusel, Martin and Ramsauer, Hubert and Unterthiner, Thomas and Nessler, Bernhard and Hochreiter, Sepp},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={30},\n year={2017}\n}\n@article{kilgour2018fad,\n title={Fr$\\backslash$'echet audio distance: A metric for evaluating music enhancement algorithms},\n author={Kilgour, Kevin and Zuluaga, Mauricio and Roblek, Dominik and Sharifi, Matthew},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08466},\n year={2018}\n}\n\n### DATASETS ###\n@inproceedings{deng2009imagenet,\n title={Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database},\n author={Deng, Jia and Dong, Wei and Socher, Richard and Li, Li-Jia and Li, Kai and Fei-Fei, Li},\n booktitle={2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition},\n pages={248--255},\n year={2009},\n organization={Ieee}\n}\n@article{veit2016coco,\n title={Coco-text: Dataset and benchmark for text detection and recognition in natural images},\n author={Veit, Andreas and Matera, Tomas and Neumann, Lukas and Matas, Jiri and Belongie, Serge},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.07140},\n year={2016}\n}\n@article{yamagishi2019vctk,\n title={CSTR VCTK Corpus: English multi-speaker corpus for CSTR voice cloning toolkit (version 0.92)},\n author={Yamagishi, Junichi and Veaux, Christophe and MacDonald, Kirsten},\n journal={The Rainbow Passage which the speakers read out can be found in the International Dialects of English Archive:(http://web. ku. edu/\\~{} idea/readings/rainbow. htm).},\n year={2019},\n publisher={University of Edinburgh. The Centre for Speech Technology Research (CSTR)}\n}\n@inproceedings{zen2019libritts,\n title={LibriTTS: A Corpus Derived from LibriSpeech for Text-to-Speech},\n author={Heiga Zen and Viet Dang and Robert A. J. Clark and Yu Zhang and Ron J. Weiss and Ye Jia and Z. Chen and Yonghui Wu},\n booktitle={Interspeech},\n year={2019},\n url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:102352475}\n}\n@inproceedings{soldaini2024dolma,\n title={Dolma: An open corpus of three trillion tokens for language model pretraining research},\n author={Soldaini, Luca and Kinney, Rodney and Bhagia, Akshita and Schwenk, Dustin and Atkinson, David and Authur, Russell and Bogin, Ben and Chandu, Khyathi and Dumas, Jennifer and Elazar, Yanai and others},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)},\n pages={15725--15788},\n year={2024}\n}\n@article{gao2020pile,\n title={The pile: An 800gb dataset of diverse text for language modeling},\n author={Gao, Leo and Biderman, Stella and Black, Sid and Golding, Laurence and Hoppe, Travis and Foster, Charles and Phang, Jason and He, Horace and Thite, Anish and Nabeshima, Noa and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.00027},\n year={2020}\n}\n@inproceedings{duan2024mimir,\n title={Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?}, \n author={Michael Duan and Anshuman Suri and Niloofar Mireshghallah and Sewon Min and Weijia Shi and Luke Zettlemoyer and Yulia Tsvetkov and Yejin Choi and David Evans and Hannaneh Hajishirzi},\n year={2024},\n booktitle={Conference on Language Modeling (COLM)},\n}\n@article{shi2023wikimia,\n title={Detecting pretraining data from large language models},\n author={Shi, Weijia and Ajith, Anirudh and Xia, Mengzhou and Huang, Yangsibo and Liu, Daogao and Blevins, Terra and Chen, Danqi and Zettlemoyer, Luke},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16789},\n year={2023}\n}\n@article{hou2024amazonreviews,\n title={Bridging Language and Items for Retrieval and Recommendation},\n author={Hou, Yupeng and Li, Jiacheng and He, Zhankui and Yan, An and Chen, Xiusi and McAuley, Julian},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03952},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass{article}\n\n% if you need to pass options to natbib, use, e.g.:\n% \\PassOptionsToPackage{numbers, compress}{natbib}\n% before loading neurips_2026\n\\PassOptionsToPackage{numbers, compress}{natbib}\n% The authors should use one of these tracks.\n% Before accepting by the NeurIPS conference, select one of the options below.\n% 0. \"default\" for submission\n % \\usepackage{neurips_2026}\n% the \"default\" option is equal to the \"main\" option, which is used for the Main Track with double-blind reviewing.\n% 1. \"main\" option is used for the Main Track\n% \\usepackage[main]{neurips_2026}\n% 2. \"position\" option is used for the Position Paper Track\n% \\usepackage[position]{neurips_2026}\n% 3. \"dandb\" option is used for the Datasets & Benchmarks Track\n % \\usepackage[dandb]{neurips_2026}\n% 4. \"creativeai\" option is used for the Creative AI Track\n% \\usepackage[creativeai]{neurips_2026}\n% 5. \"sglblindworkshop\" option is used for the Workshop with single-blind reviewing\n % \\usepackage[sglblindworkshop]{neurips_2026}\n% 6. \"dblblindworkshop\" option is used for the Workshop with double-blind reviewing\n% \\usepackage[dblblindworkshop]{neurips_2026}\n\n% After being accepted, the authors should add \"final\" behind the track to compile a camera-ready version.\n% 1. Main Track\n % \\usepackage[main, final]{neurips_2026}\n% 2. Position Paper Track\n% \\usepackage[position, final]{neurips_2026}\n% 3. Datasets & Benchmarks Track\n % \\usepackage[dandb, final]{neurips_2026}\n% 4. Creative AI Track\n% \\usepackage[creativeai, final]{neurips_2026}\n% 5. Workshop with single-blind reviewing\n% \\usepackage[sglblindworkshop, final]{neurips_2026}\n% 6. Workshop with double-blind reviewing\n% \\usepackage[dblblindworkshop, final]{neurips_2026}\n% Note. For the workshop paper template, both \\title{} and \\workshoptitle{} are required, with the former indicating the paper title shown in the title and the latter indicating the workshop title displayed in the footnote.\n% For workshops (5., 6.), the authors should add the name of the workshop, \"\\workshoptitle\" command is used to set the workshop title.\n% \\workshoptitle{WORKSHOP TITLE}\n\n% \"preprint\" option is used for arXiv or other preprint submissions\n \\usepackage[preprint]{neurips_2026}\n\n% to avoid loading the natbib package, add option nonatbib:\n% \\usepackage[nonatbib]{neurips_2026}\n\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % allow utf-8 input\n\\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % use 8-bit T1 fonts\n\\usepackage{hyperref} % hyperlinks\n\\usepackage{url} % simple URL typesetting\n\\usepackage{booktabs} % professional-quality tables\n\\usepackage{nicefrac} % compact symbols for 1/2, etc.\n\\usepackage{microtype} % microtypography\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{tikz}\n\\usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta}\n\\usepackage[most]{tcolorbox}\n\\newtcbox{\\subtitlebox}{on line, \n arc=3pt, % Rounded corners\n colback=gray!5, % Very light gray background\n colframe=gray!40, % Subtle border\n before upper=\\strut, \n boxrule=0.6pt, \n boxsep=0pt, \n left=4pt, right=4pt, top=2pt, bottom=2pt,\n fontupper=\\small \\sffamily\\bfseries% Matches typical caption size\n}\n\n\\newtcbox{\\subtitleboxblack}{on line, \n arc=3pt, % Slightly sharper corners for a professional look\n colback=black, % Black background\n colframe=black, % Black border\n colupper=white, % White text color\n boxrule=0.6pt, \n boxsep=0pt, \n left=4pt, right=4pt, top=2pt, bottom=2pt,\n fontupper=\\small\\sffamily\\bfseries % Sans-serif and Bold\n}\n\n% Colors (close to your screenshot)\n\\definecolor{okStroke}{HTML}{15803D}\n\\definecolor{okFill}{HTML}{D1FAE5}\n\\definecolor{okText}{HTML}{14532D}\n\n\\definecolor{badStroke}{HTML}{B91C1C}\n\\definecolor{badFill}{HTML}{FECACA}\n\\definecolor{badText}{HTML}{7F1D1D}\n\n% OK sign (green circle with check)\n\\newcommand{\\oksign}[1][1.0]{%\n \\tikz[baseline=-0.6ex,scale=#1]{\n \\node[\n circle,\n draw=okStroke,\n fill=okFill,\n line width=0.9pt,\n minimum size=2.2ex,\n inner sep=0pt\n ] {\\textcolor{okText}{\\bfseries\\scriptsize$\\checkmark$}};\n }%\n}\n\n% X sign (red circle with x)\n\\newcommand{\\xsign}[1][1.0]{%\n \\tikz[baseline=-0.6ex,scale=#1]{\n \\node[\n circle,\n draw=badStroke,\n fill=badFill,\n line width=0.9pt,\n minimum size=2.2ex,\n inner sep=0pt\n ] {\\textcolor{badText}{\\bfseries\\scriptsize$\\times$}};\n }%\n}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{subcaption} % subfigures\n\n% For theorems and such\n\\usepackage{amsfonts, amsmath, amssymb, amsthm}\n\\usepackage{cleveref}\n\\usepackage{mathtools}\n\\usepackage{float}\n\n\\newcommand{\\todo}[1]{\\textbf{\\color{red}[TODO: #1]}}\n\\newcommand{\\wojtek}[1]{\\textcolor{blue}{[Wojtek: #1]}}\n\\newcommand{\\stachu}[1]{\\textcolor{purple}{[Stachu: #1]}}\n\\newcommand{\\janek}[1]{\\textcolor{green}{[Janek: #1]}}\n\n\\theoremstyle{plain}\n\\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]\n\\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}\n\\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}\n\\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}\n\\theoremstyle{definition}\n\\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}\n\\newtheorem{assumption}[theorem]{Assumption}\n\\newcommand{\\R}{\\mathbb{R}}\n\\newcommand{\\N}{\\mathbb{N}}\n\\newcommand{\\E}{\\mathbb{E}}\n\\newcommand{\\Var}{\\mathrm{Var}}\n\n\n% Note. For the workshop paper template, both \\title{} and \\workshoptitle{} are required, with the former indicating the paper title shown in the title and the latter indicating the workshop title displayed in the footnote. \n\\title{Amplifying Membership Signal\\\\ Through Chained Regeneration}\n\n% \\title{MADreMIA: recursive generation for strong membership signal}\n\n% The \\author macro works with any number of authors. There are two commands\n% used to separate the names and addresses of multiple authors: \\And and \\AND.\n%\n% Using \\And between authors leaves it to LaTeX to determine where to break the\n% lines. Using \\AND forces a line break at that point. So, if LaTeX puts 3 of 4\n% authors names on the first line, and the last on the second line, try using\n% \\AND instead of \\And before the third author name.\n\n\n\\author{%\n Wojciech Łapacz\\thanks{Equal contribution.}\\textsuperscript{~~~}\\thanks{Contact: \\texttt{wojciech.lapacz02@gmail.com}}\\\\\n Warsaw University of Technology\\\\\n \\And\n Stanisław Pawlak\\footnotemark[1] \\\\\n Warsaw University of Technology\n}\n\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\\input{content/00_abstract}\n\\input{content/01_intro}\n\\input{content/02_related}\n\\input{content/04_theory}\n\\input{content/03_method}\n\\input{content/05_experiments}\n\\input{content/06_conclusions}\n\\input{content/07_acknowledgements}\n\n\\clearpage\n\\bibliographystyle{plainnat}\n\\bibliography{main}\n\n\\appendix\n\\input{content/08_appendix}\n\n\n\\end{document}\n\n================================================\nFILE: neurips_2026.sty\n================================================\n% partial rewrite of the LaTeX2e package for submissions to the\n% Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS):\n%\n% - uses more LaTeX conventions\n% - line numbers at submission time replaced with aligned numbers from\n% lineno package\n% - \\nipsfinalcopy replaced with [final] package option\n% - automatically loads times package for authors\n% - loads natbib automatically; this can be suppressed with the\n% [nonatbib] package option\n% - adds foot line to first page identifying the conference\n% - adds preprint option for submission to e.g. arXiv\n% - conference acronym modified\n% - update foot line to display the track name\n%\n% Roman Garnett (garnett@wustl.edu) and the many authors of\n% nips15submit_e.sty, including MK and drstrip@sandia\n%\n% last revision: January 2026\n\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesPackage{neurips_2026}[2026-01-29 NeurIPS 2026 submission/camera-ready style file]\n\n% declare final option, which creates camera-ready copy\n\\newif\\if@neuripsfinal\\@neuripsfinalfalse\n\\DeclareOption{final}{\n \\@neuripsfinaltrue\n \\@anonymousfalse\n}\n\n% declare nonatbib option, which does not load natbib in case of\n% package clash (users can pass options to natbib via\n% \\PassOptionsToPackage)\n\\newif\\if@natbib\\@natbibtrue\n\\DeclareOption{nonatbib}{\n \\@natbibfalse\n}\n\n% declare preprint option, which creates a preprint version ready for\n% upload to, e.g., arXiv\n\\newif\\if@preprint\\@preprintfalse\n\\DeclareOption{preprint}{\n \\@preprinttrue\n \\@anonymousfalse\n}\n\n% determine the track of the paper in camera-ready mode\n\\newif\\if@main\\@maintrue\n\\DeclareOption{main}{\n \\@maintrue\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear).}\n}\n\\newif\\if@position\\@positionfalse\n\\DeclareOption{position}{\n \\@positiontrue\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear) Position Paper Track.}\n}\n\\newif\\if@dandb\\@dandbfalse\n\\DeclareOption{dandb}{\n \\@dandbtrue\n \\@anonymousfalse\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear) Track on Datasets and Benchmarks.}\n}\n\\newif\\if@creativeai\\@creativeaifalse\n\\DeclareOption{creativeai}{\n \\@creativeaitrue\n \\@anonymousfalse\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear) Creative AI Track.}\n}\n\n% For anonymous or non-anonymous\n\\newif\\if@anonymous\\@anonymoustrue\n\n% For workshop papers\n\\newcommand{\\@workshoptitle}{}\n\\newcommand{\\workshoptitle}[1]{\\renewcommand{\\@workshoptitle}{#1}}\n\n\\newif\\if@workshop\\@workshopfalse\n\\DeclareOption{sglblindworkshop}{\n \\@workshoptrue\n \\@anonymousfalse\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear) Workshop: \\@workshoptitle.}\n}\n\\DeclareOption{dblblindworkshop}{\n \\@workshoptrue\n \\newcommand{\\@trackname}{\\@neuripsordinal\\ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear) Workshop: \\@workshoptitle.}\n}\n\n\\ProcessOptions\\relax\n\n% fonts\n\\renewcommand{\\rmdefault}{ptm}\n\\renewcommand{\\sfdefault}{phv}\n\n% change this every year for notice string at bottom\n\\newcommand{\\@neuripsordinal}{40th}\n\\newcommand{\\@neuripsyear}{2026}\n\\newcommand{\\@neuripslocation}{Sydney}\n\n% acknowledgments\n\\usepackage{environ}\n\\newcommand{\\acksection}{\\section*{Acknowledgments and Disclosure of Funding}}\n\\NewEnviron{ack}{%\n \\acksection\n \\BODY\n}\n\n%% title, authors, abstract on page 1, full paper starts on page 2\n% % We patch the standard abstract environment\n% \\RequirePackage{etoolbox}\n\n% % Redefine the end of the abstract environment\n% \\AtEndEnvironment{abstract}{%\n% \\clearpage % Force a new page\n% \\setcounter{page}{2} % Set the next page to 2\n% }\n\n% load natbib unless told otherwise\n\\if@natbib\n \\RequirePackage{natbib}\n\\fi\n\n\n\n\n\n% set page geometry\n\\usepackage[verbose=true,letterpaper]{geometry}\n\\AtBeginDocument{\n \\newgeometry{\n textheight=9in,\n textwidth=5.5in,\n top=1in,\n headheight=12pt,\n headsep=25pt,\n footskip=30pt\n }\n \\@ifpackageloaded{fullpage}\n {\\PackageWarning{neurips_2026}{fullpage package not allowed! Overwriting formatting.}}\n {}\n}\n\n\\widowpenalty=10000\n\\clubpenalty=10000\n\\flushbottom\n\\sloppy\n\n\n% font sizes with reduced leading\n\\renewcommand{\\normalsize}{%\n \\@setfontsize\\normalsize\\@xpt\\@xipt\n \\abovedisplayskip 7\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 5\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus 3\\p@\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 4\\p@ \\@plus 3\\p@ \\@minus 3\\p@\n}\n\\normalsize\n\\renewcommand{\\small}{%\n \\@setfontsize\\small\\@ixpt\\@xpt\n \\abovedisplayskip 6\\p@ \\@plus 1.5\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus 2\\p@\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 3\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@\n}\n\\renewcommand{\\footnotesize}{\\@setfontsize\\footnotesize\\@ixpt\\@xpt}\n\\renewcommand{\\scriptsize}{\\@setfontsize\\scriptsize\\@viipt\\@viiipt}\n\\renewcommand{\\tiny}{\\@setfontsize\\tiny\\@vipt\\@viipt}\n\\renewcommand{\\large}{\\@setfontsize\\large\\@xiipt{14}}\n\\renewcommand{\\Large}{\\@setfontsize\\Large\\@xivpt{16}}\n\\renewcommand{\\LARGE}{\\@setfontsize\\LARGE\\@xviipt{20}}\n\\renewcommand{\\huge}{\\@setfontsize\\huge\\@xxpt{23}}\n\\renewcommand{\\Huge}{\\@setfontsize\\Huge\\@xxvpt{28}}\n\n\n% Force \\tiny to be no smaller than 6pt\n\\renewcommand{\\tiny}{\\fontsize{6pt}{7pt}\\selectfont}\n\n% Force \\scriptsize to be no smaller than 7pt\n\\renewcommand{\\scriptsize}{\\fontsize{7pt}{8pt}\\selectfont}\n\n% Force \\footnotesize to be no smaller than 8pt\n\\renewcommand{\\footnotesize}{\\fontsize{8pt}{9.5pt}\\selectfont}\n\n% sections with less space\n\\providecommand{\\section}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\section}{%\n \\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}%\n {-2.0ex \\@plus -0.5ex \\@minus -0.2ex}%\n { 1.5ex \\@plus 0.3ex \\@minus 0.2ex}%\n {\\large\\bf\\raggedright}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\subsection}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\subsection}{%\n \\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}%\n {-1.8ex \\@plus -0.5ex \\@minus -0.2ex}%\n { 0.8ex \\@plus 0.2ex}%\n {\\normalsize\\bf\\raggedright}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\subsubsection}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\subsubsection}{%\n \\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}%\n {-1.5ex \\@plus -0.5ex \\@minus -0.2ex}%\n { 0.5ex \\@plus 0.2ex}%\n {\\normalsize\\bf\\raggedright}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\paragraph}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\paragraph}{%\n \\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}%\n {1.5ex \\@plus 0.5ex \\@minus 0.2ex}%\n {-1em}%\n {\\normalsize\\bf}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\subparagraph}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\subparagraph}{%\n \\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\\z@}%\n {1.5ex \\@plus 0.5ex \\@minus 0.2ex}%\n {-1em}%\n {\\normalsize\\bf}%\n}\n\\providecommand{\\subsubsubsection}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\subsubsubsection}{%\n \\vskip5pt{\\noindent\\normalsize\\rm\\raggedright}%\n}\n\n% float placement\n\\renewcommand{\\topfraction }{0.85}\n\\renewcommand{\\bottomfraction }{0.4}\n\\renewcommand{\\textfraction }{0.1}\n\\renewcommand{\\floatpagefraction}{0.7}\n\n\\newlength{\\@neuripsabovecaptionskip}\\setlength{\\@neuripsabovecaptionskip}{7\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\@neuripsbelowcaptionskip}\\setlength{\\@neuripsbelowcaptionskip}{\\z@}\n\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{\\@neuripsabovecaptionskip}\n\\setlength{\\belowcaptionskip}{\\@neuripsbelowcaptionskip}\n\n% swap above/belowcaptionskip lengths for tables\n\\renewenvironment{table}\n {\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{\\@neuripsbelowcaptionskip}%\n \\setlength{\\belowcaptionskip}{\\@neuripsabovecaptionskip}%\n \\@float{table}}\n {\\end@float}\n\n% footnote formatting\n\\setlength{\\footnotesep }{6.65\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\skip\\footins}{9\\p@ \\@plus 4\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\\renewcommand{\\footnoterule}{\\kern-3\\p@ \\hrule width 12pc \\kern 2.6\\p@}\n\\setcounter{footnote}{0}\n\n% paragraph formatting\n\\setlength{\\parindent}{\\z@}\n\\setlength{\\parskip }{5.5\\p@}\n\n% list formatting\n\\setlength{\\topsep }{4\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\partopsep }{1\\p@ \\@plus 0.5\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\itemsep }{2\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\parsep }{2\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\leftmargin }{3pc}\n\\setlength{\\leftmargini }{\\leftmargin}\n\\setlength{\\leftmarginii }{2em}\n\\setlength{\\leftmarginiii}{1.5em}\n\\setlength{\\leftmarginiv }{1.0em}\n\\setlength{\\leftmarginv }{0.5em}\n\\def\\@listi {\\leftmargin\\leftmargini}\n\\def\\@listii {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 2\\p@ \\@plus 1\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@\n \\parsep 1\\p@ \\@plus 0.5\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@\n \\itemsep \\parsep}\n\\def\\@listiii{\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiii\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep\n \\topsep 1\\p@ \\@plus 0.5\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\partopsep 0.5\\p@ \\@plus 0\\p@ \\@minus 0.5\\p@\n \\itemsep \\topsep}\n\\def\\@listiv {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginiv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginiv\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listv {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginv\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginv\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\\def\\@listvi {\\leftmargin\\leftmarginvi\n \\labelwidth\\leftmarginvi\n \\advance\\labelwidth-\\labelsep}\n\n% create title\n\\providecommand{\\maketitle}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\maketitle}{%\n \\par\n \\begingroup\n \\renewcommand{\\thefootnote}{\\fnsymbol{footnote}}\n % for perfect author name centering\n \\renewcommand{\\@makefnmark}{\\hbox to \\z@{$^{\\@thefnmark}$\\hss}}\n % The footnote-mark was overlapping the footnote-text,\n % added the following to fix this problem (MK)\n \\long\\def\\@makefntext##1{%\n \\parindent 1em\\noindent\n \\hbox to 1.8em{\\hss $\\m@th ^{\\@thefnmark}$}##1\n }\n \\thispagestyle{empty}\n \\@maketitle\n \\@thanks\n \\@notice\n \\endgroup\n \\let\\maketitle\\relax\n \\let\\thanks\\relax\n}\n\n% rules for title box at top of first page\n\\newcommand{\\@toptitlebar}{\n \\hrule height 4\\p@\n \\vskip 0.25in\n \\vskip -\\parskip%\n}\n\\newcommand{\\@bottomtitlebar}{\n \\vskip 0.29in\n \\vskip -\\parskip\n \\hrule height 1\\p@\n \\vskip 0.09in%\n}\n\n% create title (includes both anonymized and non-anonymized versions)\n\\providecommand{\\@maketitle}{}\n\\renewcommand{\\@maketitle}{%\n \\vbox{%\n \\hsize\\textwidth\n \\linewidth\\hsize\n \\vskip 0.1in\n \\@toptitlebar\n \\centering\n {\\LARGE\\bf \\@title\\par}\n \\@bottomtitlebar\n \\if@anonymous\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\n Anonymous Author(s) \\\\\n Affiliation \\\\\n Address \\\\\n \\texttt{email} \\\\\n \\end{tabular}%\n \\else\n \\def\\And{%\n \\end{tabular}\\hfil\\linebreak[0]\\hfil%\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\\ignorespaces%\n }\n \\def\\AND{%\n \\end{tabular}\\hfil\\linebreak[4]\\hfil%\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\\ignorespaces%\n }\n \\begin{tabular}[t]{c}\\bf\\rule{\\z@}{24\\p@}\\@author\\end{tabular}%\n \\fi\n \\vskip 0.3in \\@minus 0.1in\n }\n}\n\n% add conference notice to bottom of first page\n\\newcommand{\\ftype@noticebox}{8}\n\\newcommand{\\@notice}{%\n % give a bit of extra room back to authors on first page\n \\enlargethispage{2\\baselineskip}%\n \\@float{noticebox}[b]%\n \\footnotesize\\@noticestring%\n \\end@float%\n}\n\n% abstract styling\n\\renewenvironment{abstract}%\n{%\n \\vskip 0.075in%\n \\centerline%\n {\\large\\bf Abstract}%\n \\vspace{0.5ex}%\n \\begin{quote}%\n}\n{\n \\par%\n \\end{quote}%\n \\vskip 1ex%\n}\n\n% For the paper checklist\n\\newcommand{\\answerYes}[1][]{\\textcolor{blue}{[Yes]#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\answerNo}[1][]{\\textcolor{orange}{[No]#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\answerNA}[1][]{\\textcolor{gray}{[N/A]#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\answerTODO}[1][]{\\textcolor{red}{\\bf [TODO]}}\n\\newcommand{\\justificationTODO}[1][]{\\textcolor{red}{\\bf [TODO]}}\n\n% handle tweaks for camera-ready copy vs. submission copy\n\\if@preprint\n \\newcommand{\\@noticestring}{%\n Preprint.%\n }\n\\else\n \\if@neuripsfinal\n \\newcommand{\\@noticestring}{\n \\@trackname\n }\n \\else\n \\newcommand{\\@noticestring}{%\n Submitted to \\@neuripsordinal\\/ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS \\@neuripsyear). Do not distribute.%\n }\n\n % hide the acknowledgements\n \\NewEnviron{hide}{}\n \\let\\ack\\hide\n \\let\\endack\\endhide\n\n % line numbers for submission\n \\RequirePackage{lineno}\n \\linenumbers\n\n % fix incompatibilities between lineno and amsmath, if required, by\n % transparently wrapping linenomath environments around amsmath\n % environments\n \\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\@ifpackageloaded{amsmath}{%\n \\newcommand*\\patchAmsMathEnvironmentForLineno[1]{%\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname old#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\\csname #1\\endcsname\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname oldend#1\\expandafter\\endcsname\\csname end#1\\endcsname\n \\renewenvironment{#1}%\n {\\linenomath\\csname old#1\\endcsname}%\n {\\csname oldend#1\\endcsname\\endlinenomath}%\n }%\n \\newcommand*\\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno[1]{%\n \\patchAmsMathEnvironmentForLineno{#1}%\n \\patchAmsMathEnvironmentForLineno{#1*}%\n }%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{equation}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{align}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{flalign}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{alignat}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{gather}%\n \\patchBothAmsMathEnvironmentsForLineno{multline}%\n }\n {}\n }\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\n\\endinput\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091192,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31992"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31992"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Kailiang Wu"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Linfeng Xu, Shengrong Ding, Kailiang Wu"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"GQL-Based Physical-Constraint-Preserving High-Order Finite Difference Schemes for Special Relativistic Hydrodynamics in Arbitrary Dimensions"},"comments":{"kind":"null"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"math.NA astro-ph.IM cs.NA physics.comp-ph physics.flu-dyn"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"High-order accurate simulations of special relativistic hydrodynamics (RHD) are prone to numerical breakdown if intrinsic physical constraints (positive rest-mass density/pressure and subluminal velocity) are violated near strong discontinuities. In this work, we develop a robust and efficient physical-constraint-preserving (PCP) flux-limiting framework for high-order schemes, using finite-difference WENO as a representative example. By leveraging the geometric quasilinearization (GQL) representation, which equivalently reformulates the nonlinear RHD constraints into a family of linear inequalities, we integrate a Zalesak-type Flux-Corrected Transport (FCT) update into a scalar-style limiter that acts directly on conservative variables. A critical innovation is the explicit, non-iterative determination of limiting parameters via a rational stereographic parameterization of the GQL normal vector. This technique transforms the required worst-case minimization over auxiliary variables into a generalized Rayleigh-quotient formulation, allowing the optimal parameters to be obtained by solving small symmetric eigenvalue problems ($2\\times2$ in 1D; $(d+1)\\times(d+1)$ in $d$ dimensions). Relaxed variants are further introduced to reduce computational costs in multidimensions while retaining the PCP guarantee. Extensive numerical benchmarks ranging from 1D to 3D, including ultra-relativistic Riemann problems and astrophysical jets, demonstrate that the proposed method robustly enforces physical admissibility, sharply resolves discontinuities, and maintains design-order accuracy for smooth solutions."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:29:34 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:29:34 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Xu","Linfeng",""],["Ding","Shengrong",""],["Wu","Kailiang",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Xu\",\n \"Linfeng\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Ding\",\n \"Shengrong\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Wu\",\n \"Kailiang\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: elsarticle.cls\n================================================\n%%\n%% This is file `elsarticle.cls',\n%% generated with the docstrip utility.\n%%\n%% The original source files were:\n%%\n%% elsarticle.dtx (with options: `class')\n%% \n%% Copyright 2007-2013 Elsevier Ltd\n%% \n%% This file is part of the 'Elsarticle Bundle'.\n%% -------------------------------------------\n%% \n%% It may be distributed under the conditions of the LaTeX Project Public\n%% License, either version 1.2 of this license or (at your option) any\n%% later version. The latest version of this license is in\n%% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt\n%% and version 1.2 or later is part of all distributions of LaTeX\n%% version 1999/12/01 or later.\n%% \n%% The list of all files belonging to the 'Elsarticle Bundle' is\n%% given in the file `manifest.txt'.\n%% \n%%\n%% $Id: elsarticle.dtx 70 2013-07-25 11:29:05Z rishi $\n%%\n \\def\\RCSfile{elsarticle}%\n \\def\\RCSversion{2.1}%\n \\def\\RCSdate{2013/07/25}%\n \\def\\@shortjnl{\\relax}\n \\def\\@journal{Elsevier Ltd} \\def\\@company{Elsevier Ltd}\n \\def\\@issn{000-0000}\n \\def\\@shortjid{elsarticle}\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1995/12/01]\n\\ProvidesClass{\\@shortjid}[\\RCSdate, \\RCSversion: \\@journal]\n\\def\\ABD{\\AtBeginDocument}\n\\newif\\ifpreprint \\preprintfalse\n\\newif\\ifnonatbib \\nonatbibfalse\n\\newif\\iflongmktitle \\longmktitlefalse\n\\newif\\ifnopreprintline \\nopreprintlinefalse\n\\newif\\ifdoubleblind \\doubleblindfalse\n\n\\def\\@blstr{1}\n\\newdimen\\@bls\n\\@bls=\\baselineskip\n\n\\def\\@finalWarning{%\n *****************************************************\\MessageBreak\n This document is typeset in the CRC style which\\MessageBreak\n is not suitable for submission.\\MessageBreak\n \\MessageBreak\n Please typeset again using 'preprint' option\\MessageBreak\n for creating PDF suitable for submission.\\MessageBreak\n ******************************************************\\MessageBreak\n}\n\n\\DeclareOption{preprint}{\\global\\preprinttrue\n \\gdef\\@blstr{1}\\xdef\\jtype{0}%\n \\AtBeginDocument{\\@twosidefalse\\@mparswitchfalse}}\n\\DeclareOption{nopreprintline}{\\global\\nopreprintlinetrue}\n\\DeclareOption{final}{\\gdef\\@blstr{1}\\global\\preprintfalse}\n\\DeclareOption{review}{\\global\\preprinttrue\\gdef\\@blstr{1.5}}\n\\DeclareOption{authoryear}{\\xdef\\@biboptions{round,authoryear}}\n\\DeclareOption{number}{\\xdef\\@biboptions{numbers}}\n\\DeclareOption{numbers}{\\xdef\\@biboptions{numbers}}\n\\DeclareOption{nonatbib}{\\global\\nonatbibtrue}\n\\DeclareOption{longtitle}{\\global\\longmktitletrue}\n\\DeclareOption{5p}{\\xdef\\jtype{5}\\global\\preprintfalse\n \\ExecuteOptions{twocolumn}}\n \\def\\jtype{0}\n\\DeclareOption{3p}{\\xdef\\jtype{3}\\global\\preprintfalse}\n\\DeclareOption{1p}{\\xdef\\jtype{1}\\global\\preprintfalse\n \\AtBeginDocument{\\@twocolumnfalse}}\n\\DeclareOption{times}{\\IfFileExists{txfonts.sty}%\n {\\AtEndOfClass{\\RequirePackage{txfonts}%\n \\gdef\\ttdefault{cmtt}%\n \\let\\iint\\relax\n \\let\\iiint\\relax\n \\let\\iiiint\\relax\n \\let\\idotsint\\relax\n \\let\\openbox\\relax}}{\\AtEndOfClass{\\RequirePackage{times}}}}\n\n\\DeclareOption{endfloat}{\\IfFileExists{endfloat.sty}\n {\\AtEndOfClass{\\RequirePackage[markers]{endfloat}}}{}}\n\\DeclareOption{endfloats}{\\IfFileExists{endfloat.sty}\n {\\AtEndOfClass{\\RequirePackage[markers]{endfloat}}}{}}\n\\DeclareOption{numafflabel}\n {\\AtBeginDocument{\\def\\theaffn{\\arabic{affn}}}} %*%\n\\DeclareOption{lefttitle}\n {\\AtBeginDocument{\\def\\elsarticletitlealign{flushleft}}} %*%\n\\DeclareOption{centertitle}\n {\\AtBeginDocument{\\def\\elsarticletitlealign{center}}} %*%\n\\DeclareOption{reversenotenum}\n {\\AtBeginDocument{\\def\\theaffn{\\arabic{affn}}\n \\def\\thefnote{\\alph{fnote}}}}\n\\DeclareOption{doubleblind}{\\doubleblindtrue}\n\n\\ExecuteOptions{a4paper,10pt,oneside,onecolumn,number,preprint,centertitle}\n\\DeclareOption*{\\PassOptionsToClass{\\CurrentOption}{article}}\n\\ProcessOptions\n\\LoadClass{article}\n\\RequirePackage{graphicx}\n\n\\let\\comma\\@empty\n\\let\\tnotesep\\@empty\n\\let\\@title\\@empty\n\n\\def\\useelstitle{}\n\n\\def\\title#1{\\g@addto@macro\\@title{#1%\n \\global\\let\\tnoteref\\@gobble}%\n \\g@addto@macro\\useelstitle{#1}}\n\n\\def\\elsLabel#1{\\@bsphack\\protected@write\\@auxout{}%\n {\\string\\Newlabel{#1}{\\@currentlabel}}\\@esphack}\n\\def\\Newlabel#1#2{\\expandafter\\xdef\\csname X@#1\\endcsname{#2}}\n\n\\def\\elsRef#1{\\@ifundefined{X@#1}{0}{\\csname X@#1\\endcsname}}\n\n\\let\\@tnotemark\\@empty\n\n\\ifdoubleblind\n \\def\\tnotemark[#1]{}\n\\else\n \\def\\tnotemark[#1]{\\@for\\mytmark:=#1\\do{%\n \\expandafter\\ifcase\\csname X@\\mytmark\\endcsname\\or$^{\\star}$\\or\n $^{,\\star\\star}$\\fi\n }%\n}\n\\fi\n\n\\def\\tnoteref#1{\\tnotemark[{#1}]}\n\\let\\@tnotes\\@empty\n\\newcounter{tnote}\n\\def\\tnotetext[#1]#2{\\g@addto@macro\\@tnotes{%\n \\stepcounter{tnote}\\elsLabel{#1}%\n \\def\\thefootnote{\\ifcase\\c@tnote\\or$\\star$\\or$\\star\\star$\\fi}%\n \\footnotetext{#2}}}\n\n\\let\\@nonumnotes\\@empty\n\\def\\nonumnote#1{\\g@addto@macro\\@nonumnotes{%\n \\let\\thefootnote\\relax\\footnotetext{#1}}}\n\n\\newcounter{fnote}\n\\def\\thefnote{\\arabic{fnote}}\n\\def\\fnmark[#1]{\\let\\comma\\@empty\n \\def\\@fnmark{\\@for\\@@fnmark:=#1\\do{%\n \\edef\\fnotenum{\\@ifundefined{X@\\@@fnmark}{1}{\\elsRef{\\@@fnmark}}}%\n \\unskip\\comma\\fnotenum\\let\\comma,}}%\n}\n\n\\def\\fnref#1{\\fnmark[#1]}\n\n\\let\\@fnotes\\@empty\\let\\@fnmark\\@empty\n\\def\\fntext[#1]#2{\\g@addto@macro\\@fnotes{%\n \\refstepcounter{fnote}\\elsLabel{#1}%\n \\def\\thefootnote{\\c@fnote}%\n \\global\\setcounter{footnote}{\\c@fnote}%\n \\footnotetext{#2}}}\n\n\\def\\cormark[#1]{\\edef\\cnotenum{\\elsRef{#1}}%\n \\unskip\\textsuperscript{\\sep\\ifcase\\cnotenum\\or\n $\\ast$\\or$\\ast\\ast$\\fi\\hspace{-1pt}}\\let\\sep=,}\n\n\\let\\@cormark\\@empty\n\\let\\@cornotes\\@empty\n\\newcounter{cnote}\n\\def\\cortext[#1]#2{\\g@addto@macro\\@cornotes{%\n \\refstepcounter{cnote}\\elsLabel{#1}%\n \\def\\thefootnote{\\ifcase\\thecnote\\or$\\ast$\\or\n $\\ast\\ast$\\fi}%\n \\footnotetext{#2}}}\n\n\\let\\@corref\\@empty\n\\def\\corref#1{\\edef\\cnotenum{\\elsRef{#1}}%\n \\edef\\@corref{\\ifcase\\cnotenum\\or\n $\\ast$\\or$\\ast\\ast$\\fi\\hskip-1pt}}\n\n\\def\\resetTitleCounters{\\c@cnote=0\n \\c@fnote=0 \\c@tnote=0 \\c@footnote=0}\n\n\\let\\eadsep\\@empty\n\\def\\@elseads{}\n\\let\\@elsuads\\@empty\n\\let\\@cormark\\@empty\n\\def\\hashchar{\\expandafter\\@gobble\\string\\~}\n\\def\\underscorechar{\\expandafter\\@gobble\\string\\_}\n\\def\\lbracechar{\\expandafter\\@gobble\\string\\{}\n\\def\\rbracechar{\\expandafter\\@gobble\\string\\}}\n\n\\gdef\\ead{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@uad}{\\@ead}}\n\\gdef\\@ead#1{\\bgroup\n \\def\\_{\\underscorechar}%\n \\def\\{{\\lbracechar}%\n \\def~{\\hashchar}%\n \\def\\}{\\rbracechar}%\n \\edef\\tmp{\\the\\@eadauthor}%\n \\immediate\\write\\@auxout{\\string\\emailauthor\n {#1}{\\expandafter\\strip@prefix\\meaning\\tmp}}%\n \\egroup\n}\n\\newcounter{ead}\n\\gdef\\emailauthor#1#2{\\stepcounter{ead}%\n \\g@addto@macro\\@elseads{\\raggedright%\n \\let\\corref\\@gobble\\def\\@@tmp{#1}%\n \\eadsep{\\ttfamily\\expandafter\\strip@prefix\\meaning\\@@tmp}\n (#2)\\def\\eadsep{\\unskip,\\space}}%\n}\n\\gdef\\@uad[#1]#2{\\bgroup\n \\def~{\\hashchar}%\n \\def\\_{\\underscorechar}%\n \\def~{\\hashchar}%\n \\def\\}{\\rbracechar}%\n \\edef\\tmp{\\the\\@eadauthor}\n \\immediate\\write\\@auxout{\\string\\urlauthor\n {#2}{\\expandafter\\strip@prefix\\meaning\\tmp}}%\n \\egroup\n}\n\\gdef\\urlauthor#1#2{\\g@addto@macro\\@elsuads{\\let\\corref\\@gobble%\n \\def\\@@tmp{#1}\\raggedright\\eadsep\n {\\ttfamily\\expandafter\\strip@prefix\\meaning\\@@tmp}\\space(#2)%\n \\def\\eadsep{\\unskip,\\space}}%\n}\n\n\\def\\elsauthors{}\n\\def\\useauthors{}\n\n\\def\\pprinttitle{}\n\\let\\authorsep\\@empty\n\\let\\sep\\@empty\n\\newcounter{author}\n\\def\\author{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@author}{\\@author}}\n\n\\newtoks\\@eadauthor\n\\def\\@@author[#1]#2{\\g@addto@macro\\elsauthors{%\n \\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n \\authorsep#2\\unskip\\textsuperscript{%#1%\n \\@for\\@@affmark:=#1\\do{%\n \\edef\\affnum{\\@ifundefined{X@\\@@affmark}{1}{\\elsRef{\\@@affmark}}}%\n \\unskip\\sep\\affnum\\let\\sep=,}%\n \\ifx\\@fnmark\\@empty\\else\\unskip\\sep\\@fnmark\\let\\sep=,\\fi\n \\ifx\\@corref\\@empty\\else\\unskip\\sep\\@corref\\let\\sep=,\\fi\n }%\n \\def\\authorsep{\\unskip,\\space}%\n \\global\\let\\sep\\@empty\\global\\let\\@corref\\@empty\n \\global\\let\\@fnmark\\@empty}%\n \\@eadauthor={#2}%\n \\g@addto@macro\\useauthors{#2; }%\n}\n\n\\def\\@author#1{\\g@addto@macro\\elsauthors{\\normalsize%\n \\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n \\upshape\\authorsep#1\\unskip\\textsuperscript{%\n \\ifx\\@fnmark\\@empty\\else\\unskip\\sep\\@fnmark\\let\\sep=,\\fi\n \\ifx\\@corref\\@empty\\else\\unskip\\sep\\@corref\\let\\sep=,\\fi\n }%\n \\def\\authorsep{\\unskip,\\space}%\n \\global\\let\\@fnmark\\@empty\n \\global\\let\\@corref\\@empty \\global\\let\\sep\\@empty}%\n \\@eadauthor={#1}%\n \\g@addto@macro\\useauthors{#1; }%\n}\n\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\@ifpackageloaded{hyperref}{%\n \\expandafter\\gdef\\csname Hy@title\\endcsname{\\useelstitle}%\n \\expandafter\\gdef\\csname Hy@author\\endcsname{\\useauthors}%\n }{}\n}\n\n\\def\\elsaddress{}\n\\def\\addsep{\\par\\vskip6pt}\n\\def\\address{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@@address}{\\@address}}\n\n\\def\\@alph#1{%\n \\ifcase#1\\or a\\or b\\or c\\or d\\or e\\or f\\or g\\or h\\or i\\or j\\or k\\or\n l\\or m\\or n\\or o\\or p\\or q\\or r\\or s\\or t\\or u\\or v\\or w\\or x\\or\n y\\or z%\n \\or aa\\or ab\\or ac\\or ad\\or ae\\or af\\or ag\\or ah\\or ai\\or aj\\or\n ak\\or al\\or am\\or an\\or ao\\or ap\\or aq\\or ar\\or as\\or at\\or au\\or\n av\\or aw\\or ax\\or ay\\or az%\n \\or ba\\or bb\\or bc\\or bd\\or be\\or bf\\or bg\\or bh\\or bi\\or bj\\or\n bk\\or bl\\or bm\\or bn\\or bo\\or bp\\or bq\\or br\\or bs\\or bt\\or bu\\or\n bv\\or bw\\or bx\\or by\\or bz%\n \\or ca\\or cb\\or cc\\or cd\\or ce\\or cf\\or cg\\or ch\\or ci\\or cj\\or\n ck\\or cl\\or cm\\or cn\\or co\\or cp\\or cq\\or cr\\or cs\\or ct\\or cu\\or\n cv\\or cw\\or cx\\or cy\\or cz%\n \\or da\\or db\\or dc\\or dd\\or de\\or df\\or dg\\or dh\\or di\\or dj\\or\n dk\\or dl\\or dm\\or dn\\or do\\or dp\\or dq\\or dr\\or ds\\or dt\\or du\\or\n dv\\or dw\\or dx\\or dy\\or dz%\n \\or ea\\or eb\\or ec\\or ed\\or ee\\or ef\\or eg\\or eh\\or ei\\or ej\\or\n ek\\or el\\or em\\or en\\or eo\\or ep\\or eq\\or er\\or es\\or et\\or eu\\or\n ev\\or ew\\or ex\\or ey\\or ez%\n \\or fa\\or fb\\or fc\\or fd\\or fe\\or ff\\or fg\\or fh\\or fi\\or fj\\or\n fk\\or fl\\or fm\\or fn\\or fo\\or fp\\or fq\\or fr\\or fs\\or ft\\or fu\\or\n fv\\or fw\\or fx\\or fy\\or fz%\n \\or ga\\or gb\\or gc\\or gd\\or ge\\or gf\\or gg\\or gh\\or gi\\or gj\\or\n gk\\or gl\\or gm\\or gn\\or go\\or gp\\or gq\\or gr\\or gs\\or gt\\or gu\\or\n gv\\or gw\\or gx\\or gy\\or gz%\n \\else\\@ctrerr\\fi}\n\n\\newcounter{affn}\n\\renewcommand\\theaffn{\\alph{affn}}\n\n\\long\\def\\@@address[#1]#2{\\g@addto@macro\\elsaddress{%\n \\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n \\refstepcounter{affn}\n \\xdef\\@currentlabel{\\theaffn}\n \\elsLabel{#1}%\n \\textsuperscript{\\theaffn}#2\\par}}\n\n\\long\\def\\@address#1{\\g@addto@macro\\elsauthors{%\n \\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n \\addsep\\footnotesize\\itshape#1\\def\\addsep{\\par\\vskip6pt}%\n \\def\\authorsep{\\par\\vskip8pt}}}\n\n\\newbox\\absbox\n\\let\\@elsarticleabstitle\\@empty %*%\n\\def\\abstracttitle#1{\\gdef\\@elsarticleabstitle{#1}} %*%\n\\abstracttitle{Abstract} %*%\n\\renewenvironment{abstract}{\\global\\setbox\\absbox=\\vbox\\bgroup\n \\hsize=\\textwidth\\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n \\noindent\\unskip\\textbf{\\@elsarticleabstitle} %*%\n \\par\\medskip\\noindent\\unskip\\ignorespaces}\n {\\egroup}\n\n\\newbox\\keybox\n\\let\\@elsarticlekwdtitle\\@empty %*%\n\\def\\keywordtitle#1{\\gdef\\@elsarticlekwdtitle{#1}} %*%\n\\def\\keywordtitlesep#1{\\gdef\\@elsarticlekeywordtitlesep{#1}} %*%\n\\keywordtitle{\\normalsize \\bfseries Keywords} %*%\n\\keywordtitlesep{:\\ }\n\\def\\keyword{%\n \\def\\sep{\\unskip, }%\n \\def\\MSC{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@MSC}{\\@MSC[2000]}}\n \\def\\@MSC[##1]{\\par\\leavevmode\\hbox {\\it ##1~MSC:\\space}}%\n \\def\\PACS{\\par\\leavevmode\\hbox {\\it PACS:\\space}}%\n \\def\\JEL{\\par\\leavevmode\\hbox {\\it JEL:\\space}}%\n \\global\\setbox\\keybox=\\vbox\\bgroup\\hsize=\\textwidth\n \\normalsize\\normalfont\\def\\baselinestretch{1}\n \\parskip\\z@\n \\noindent\\textit{\\@elsarticlekwdtitle\\@elsarticlekeywordtitlesep}\n \\raggedright % Keywords are not justified.\n \\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\endkeyword{\\par \\egroup}\n\n\\newdimen\\Columnwidth\n\\Columnwidth=\\columnwidth\n\n\\def\\printFirstPageNotes{%\n \\iflongmktitle\n \\let\\columnwidth=\\textwidth\n \\fi\n\\ifdoubleblind\n\\else\n \\ifx\\@tnotes\\@empty\\else\\@tnotes\\fi\n \\ifx\\@nonumnotes\\@empty\\else\\@nonumnotes\\fi\n \\ifx\\@cornotes\\@empty\\else\\@cornotes\\fi\n \\ifx\\@elseads\\@empty\\relax\\else\n \\let\\thefootnote\\relax\n \\footnotetext{\\ifnum\\theead=1\\relax\n \\textit{Email address:\\space}\\else\n \\textit{Email addresses:\\space}\\fi\n \\@elseads}\\fi\n \\ifx\\@elsuads\\@empty\\relax\\else\n \\let\\thefootnote\\relax\n \\footnotetext{\\textit{URL:\\space}%\n \\@elsuads}\\fi\n\\fi\n \\ifx\\@fnotes\\@empty\\else\\@fnotes\\fi\n \\iflongmktitle\\if@twocolumn\n \\let\\columnwidth=\\Columnwidth\\fi\\fi\n}\n\n%% Pushing text to begin on newpage %*%\n\\def\\newpage@after@title{title}\n\\def\\newpage@after@author{author}\n\\def\\newpage@after@abstract{abstract}\n\\def\\newpageafter#1%\n {\\gdef\\@elsarticlenewpageafter{#1}}\n\n\\long\\def\\pprintMaketitle{\\clearpage\n \\iflongmktitle\\if@twocolumn\\let\\columnwidth=\\textwidth\\fi\\fi\n \\resetTitleCounters\n \\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n \\printFirstPageNotes\n \\begin{\\elsarticletitlealign}%\n \\thispagestyle{pprintTitle}%\n \\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n \\Large\\@title\\par\\vskip18pt%\n \\ifx\\@elsarticlenewpageafter\\newpage@after@title% %*%\n \\newpage\n \\fi%\n \\ifdoubleblind\n \\vspace*{2pc}\n \\else\n \\normalsize\\elsauthors\\par\\vskip10pt\n \\footnotesize\\itshape\\elsaddress\\par\\vskip36pt\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\@elsarticlenewpageafter\\newpage@after@author% %*%\n \\newpage\n \\fi%\n \\hrule\\vskip12pt\n \\ifvoid\\absbox\\else\\unvbox\\absbox\\par\\vskip10pt\\fi\n \\ifvoid\\keybox\\else\\unvbox\\keybox\\par\\vskip10pt\\fi\n \\hrule\\vskip12pt\n \\ifx\\@elsarticlenewpageafter\\newpage@after@abstract% %*%\n \\newpage\n \\fi%\n \\end{\\elsarticletitlealign}%\n \\gdef\\thefootnote{\\arabic{footnote}}%\n }\n\n\\def\\printWarning{%\n \\mbox{}\\par\\vfill\\par\\bgroup\n \\fboxsep12pt\\fboxrule1pt\n \\hspace*{.18\\textwidth}\n \\fcolorbox{gray50}{gray10}{\\box\\warnbox}\n \\egroup\\par\\vfill\\thispagestyle{empty}\n \\setcounter{page}{0}\n \\clearpage}\n\n\\long\\def\\finalMaketitle{%\n \\resetTitleCounters\n \\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n \\MaketitleBox\n \\thispagestyle{pprintTitle}%\n \\gdef\\thefootnote{\\arabic{footnote}}%\n }\n\n\\long\\def\\MaketitleBox{%\n \\resetTitleCounters\n \\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n \\begin{\\elsarticletitlealign}%\n \\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n \\Large\\@title\\par\\vskip18pt\n \\ifdoubleblind\n \\vspace*{2pc}\n \\else\n \\normalsize\\elsauthors\\par\\vskip10pt\n \\footnotesize\\itshape\\elsaddress\\par\\vskip36pt\n \\fi\n \\hrule\\vskip12pt\n \\ifvoid\\absbox\\else\\unvbox\\absbox\\par\\vskip10pt\\fi\n \\ifvoid\\keybox\\else\\unvbox\\keybox\\par\\vskip10pt\\fi\n \\hrule\\vskip12pt\n \\end{\\elsarticletitlealign}%\n}\n\n\\def\\FNtext#1{\\par\\bgroup\\footnotesize#1\\egroup}\n\\newdimen\\space@left\n\\def\\alarm#1{\\typeout{******************************}%\n \\typeout{#1}%\n \\typeout{******************************}%\n}\n\n\\def\\titlespancalculator#1#2#3#4{%\n % break count\n \\@tempcnta=#4\\relax%\n % pagebreakcount increment\n \\advance\\@tempcnta by 1\\relax%\n % title page height\n \\@tempdima=#1\\relax%\n % Page height - title page notes height (only for first break)\n % Page height - textheight (for remaining breaks)\n % Page height - title page notes height\n \\@tempdimb=#2\\relax%\n % Remaining title page height\n \\advance\\@tempdima -\\the\\@tempdimb%\n % Checks if remaining title page\n % height less than textheight\n \\ifdim\\the\\@tempdima>#3\\relax%\n \\titlespancalculator%\n {\\the\\@tempdima}{#3}{#3}{\\the\\@tempcnta}%Break again\n \\else%\n % Save break count and exit.\n \\xdef\\savetitlepagespan{\\the\\@tempcnta}%\n \\fi%\n}%\n\n\\long\\def\\myfor#1#2#3{%\n \\@tempcnta=#1\\relax%\n \\ifnum#1<#2\\relax%\n \\advance\\@tempcnta by 1\\relax%\n #3%\n \\myfor{\\the\\@tempcnta}{#2}{#3}%\n \\fi}\n\n\\long\\def\\getSpaceLeft{%\\global\\@twocolumnfalse%\n \\global\\setbox0=\\vbox{\\hsize=\\textwidth\\MaketitleBox}%\n \\global\\setbox1=\\vbox{\\hsize=\\textwidth\n \\let\\footnotetext\\FNtext\n \\printFirstPageNotes}%\n \\xdef\\noteheight{\\the\\ht1}%\n \\xdef\\titleheight{\\the\\ht0}%\n \\@tempdima=\\vsize\n \\advance\\@tempdima-\\noteheight\n \\advance\\@tempdima-1\\baselineskip\n \\xdef\\savefpageheight{\\the\\@tempdima}%\n \\setbox2=\\vbox{\\titlespancalculator{\\titleheight}%\n {\\savefpageheight}{\\textheight}{0}}%\n}\n\n \\skip\\footins=24pt\n\n\\newbox\\els@boxa\n\\newbox\\els@boxb\n\n\\ifpreprint\n \\def\\maketitle{\\pprintMaketitle}\n \\else\n \\ifnum\\jtype=1\n \\def\\maketitle{%\n \\iflongmktitle\\getSpaceLeft\n \\ifdim\\noteheight>0pt%\n \\advance\\@tempdima-1.35\\baselineskip\n \\fi%\n \\global\\setbox\\els@boxa=\\vsplit0 to \\@tempdima\n \\box\\els@boxa\\par\\resetTitleCounters\n \\thispagestyle{pprintTitle}%\n \\printFirstPageNotes\n \\ifnum\\savetitlepagespan>1\\relax%\n \\myfor{2}{\\savetitlepagespan}{%\n \\global\\setbox\\els@boxb=\\vsplit0 to \\textheight%\\@tempdima\n \\box\\els@boxb}\n \\else%\n \\fi%\n \\box0%\n \\else\n \\finalMaketitle\\printFirstPageNotes\n \\fi\n \\gdef\\thefootnote{\\arabic{footnote}}}%\n \\else\n \\ifnum\\jtype=5\n \\def\\maketitle{%\n \\iflongmktitle\\getSpaceLeft\n \\ifdim\\noteheight>0pt%\n \\advance\\@tempdima-1.35\\baselineskip\n \\fi%\n \\global\\setbox\\els@boxa=\\vsplit0 to \\@tempdima\n \\box\\els@boxa\\par\\resetTitleCounters\n \\thispagestyle{pprintTitle}%\n \\printFirstPageNotes\n \\ifnum\\savetitlepagespan>1\\relax%\n \\myfor{2}{\\savetitlepagespan}{%\n \\global\\setbox\\els@boxb=\\vsplit0 to \\textheight%\\@tempdima\n \\twocolumn[\\box\\els@boxb]}\n \\else%\n \\fi%\n \\twocolumn[\\box0]%\\printFirstPageNotes\n \\else\n \\twocolumn[\\finalMaketitle]\\printFirstPageNotes\n \\fi\n \\gdef\\thefootnote{\\arabic{footnote}}}\n \\else\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\def\\maketitle{%\n \\iflongmktitle\\getSpaceLeft\n \\ifdim\\noteheight>0pt%\n \\advance\\@tempdima-1.35\\baselineskip\n \\fi%\n \\global\\setbox\\els@boxa=\\vsplit0 to \\@tempdima\n \\box\\els@boxa\\par\\resetTitleCounters\n \\thispagestyle{pprintTitle}%\n \\printFirstPageNotes\n \\ifnum\\savetitlepagespan>1\\relax%\n \\myfor{2}{\\savetitlepagespan}{%\n \\global\\setbox\\els@boxb=\\vsplit0 to \\textheight%\\@tempdima\n \\twocolumn[\\box\\els@boxb]}\n \\else%\n \\fi%\n \\twocolumn[\\box0]%\n \\else\n \\twocolumn[\\finalMaketitle]\\printFirstPageNotes\n \\fi\n \\gdef\\thefootnote{\\arabic{footnote}}}%\n \\else\n \\def\\maketitle{%\n \\iflongmktitle\\getSpaceLeft\n \\ifdim\\noteheight>0pt%\n \\advance\\@tempdima-1.35\\baselineskip\n \\fi%\n \\global\\setbox\\els@boxa=\\vsplit0 to \\@tempdima\n \\box\\els@boxa\\par\\resetTitleCounters\n \\thispagestyle{pprintTitle}%\n \\printFirstPageNotes\n \\ifnum\\savetitlepagespan>1\\relax%\n \\myfor{2}{\\savetitlepagespan}{%\n \\global\\setbox\\els@boxb=\\vsplit0 to \\textheight%\\@tempdima\n \\box\\els@boxb}\n \\else%\n \\fi%\n \\box0%\n \\else\n \\finalMaketitle\\printFirstPageNotes\n \\fi\n \\gdef\\thefootnote{\\arabic{footnote}}}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\fi\n\\fi\n\n\\let\\@elsarticlemyfooter\\@empty\n\\let\\@elsarticlemyfooteralign\\@empty\n\\def\\@elsarticlemyfooteralignleft{L}\n\\def\\@elsarticlemyfooteralignright{R}\n\\def\\@elsarticlemyfooteraligncenter{C}\n\n\\def\\myfooter[#1]#2 %*%\n {\\gdef\\@elsarticlemyfooteralign{#1}\n \\gdef\\@elsarticlemyfooter{#2}}\n\n\n\\def\\myfooterfont#1{\\gdef\\@myfooterfont{#1}}\n\\myfooterfont{\\footnotesize\\itshape}\n\\def\\ps@pprintTitle{%\n \\let\\@oddhead\\@empty\n \\let\\@evenhead\\@empty\n \\def\\@oddfoot\n {\\hbox to \\textwidth%\n {\\ifnopreprintline\\relax\\else\n \\@myfooterfont%\n \\ifx\\@elsarticlemyfooteralign\\@elsarticlemyfooteraligncenter%\n \\hfil\\@elsarticlemyfooter\\hfil%\n \\else%\n \\ifx\\@elsarticlemyfooteralign\\@elsarticlemyfooteralignleft%\n \\@elsarticlemyfooter\\hfill{}%\n \\else%\n \\ifx\\@elsarticlemyfooteralign\\@elsarticlemyfooteralignright%\n {}\\hfill\\@elsarticlemyfooter%\n \\else%\n Preprint submitted to \\ifx\\@journal\\@empty%\n Elsevier%\n \\else\\@journal\\fi\\hfill\\@date\\fi%\n \\fi%\n \\fi%\n \\fi%\n }\n }%\n \\let\\@evenfoot\\@oddfoot}\n\\def\\@seccntDot{.}\n\\def\\@seccntformat#1{\\csname the#1\\endcsname\\@seccntDot\\hskip 0.5em}\n\n\\renewcommand\\section{\\@startsection {section}{1}{\\z@}%\n {18\\p@ \\@plus 6\\p@ \\@minus 3\\p@}%\n {9\\p@ \\@plus 6\\p@ \\@minus 3\\p@}%\n {\\normalsize\\bfseries\\boldmath}}\n\\renewcommand\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}%\n {12\\p@ \\@plus 6\\p@ \\@minus 3\\p@}%\n {3\\p@ \\@plus 6\\p@ \\@minus 3\\p@}%\n {\\normalfont\\bfseries\\itshape}} %\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape\n\\renewcommand\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}%\n {12\\p@ \\@plus 6\\p@ \\@minus 3\\p@}%\n {\\p@}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\itshape}}\n\n\\def\\paragraph{\\secdef{\\els@aparagraph}{\\els@bparagraph}}\n\\def\\els@aparagraph[#1]#2{\\elsparagraph[#1]{#2.}}\n\\def\\els@bparagraph#1{\\elsparagraph*{#1.}}\n\n\\newcommand\\elsparagraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{0\\z@}%\n {10\\p@ \\@plus 6\\p@ \\@minus 3\\p@}%\n {-6\\p@}%\n {\\normalfont\\itshape}}\n\\newdimen\\leftMargin\n\\leftMargin=2em\n\\newtoks\\@enLab %\\newtoks\\@enfont\n\\def\\@enQmark{?}\n\\def\\@enLabel#1#2{%\n \\edef\\@enThe{\\noexpand#1{\\@enumctr}}%\n \\@enLab\\expandafter{\\the\\@enLab\\csname the\\@enumctr\\endcsname}%\n \\@enloop}\n\\def\\@enSpace{\\afterassignment\\@enSp@ce\\let\\@tempa= }\n\\def\\@enSp@ce{\\@enLab\\expandafter{\\the\\@enLab\\space}\\@enloop}\n\\def\\@enGroup#1{\\@enLab\\expandafter{\\the\\@enLab{#1}}\\@enloop}\n\\def\\@enOther#1{\\@enLab\\expandafter{\\the\\@enLab#1}\\@enloop}\n\\def\\@enloop{\\futurelet\\@entemp\\@enloop@}\n\\def\\@enloop@{%\n \\ifx A\\@entemp \\def\\@tempa{\\@enLabel\\Alph }\\else\n \\ifx a\\@entemp \\def\\@tempa{\\@enLabel\\alph }\\else\n \\ifx i\\@entemp \\def\\@tempa{\\@enLabel\\roman }\\else\n \\ifx I\\@entemp \\def\\@tempa{\\@enLabel\\Roman }\\else\n \\ifx 1\\@entemp \\def\\@tempa{\\@enLabel\\arabic}\\else\n \\ifx \\@sptoken\\@entemp \\let\\@tempa\\@enSpace \\else\n \\ifx \\bgroup\\@entemp \\let\\@tempa\\@enGroup \\else\n \\ifx \\@enum@\\@entemp \\let\\@tempa\\@gobble \\else\n \\let\\@tempa\\@enOther\n \\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\\fi\n \\@tempa}\n\\newlength{\\@sep} \\newlength{\\@@sep}\n\\setlength{\\@sep}{.5\\baselineskip plus.2\\baselineskip\n minus.2\\baselineskip}\n\\setlength{\\@@sep}{.1\\baselineskip plus.01\\baselineskip\n minus.05\\baselineskip}\n\\providecommand{\\sfbc}{\\rmfamily\\upshape}\n\\providecommand{\\sfn}{\\rmfamily\\upshape}\n\\def\\@enfont{\\ifnum \\@enumdepth >1\\let\\@nxt\\sfn \\else\\let\\@nxt\\sfbc \\fi\\@nxt}\n\\def\\enumerate{%\n \\ifnum \\@enumdepth >3 \\@toodeep\\else\n \\advance\\@enumdepth \\@ne\n \\edef\\@enumctr{enum\\romannumeral\\the\\@enumdepth}\\fi\n \\@ifnextchar[{\\@@enum@}{\\@enum@}}\n\\def\\@@enum@[#1]{%\n \\@enLab{}\\let\\@enThe\\@enQmark\n \\@enloop#1\\@enum@\n \\ifx\\@enThe\\@enQmark\\@warning{The counter will not be printed.%\n ^^J\\space\\@spaces\\@spaces\\@spaces The label is: \\the\\@enLab}\\fi\n \\expandafter\\edef\\csname label\\@enumctr\\endcsname{\\the\\@enLab}%\n \\expandafter\\let\\csname the\\@enumctr\\endcsname\\@enThe\n \\csname c@\\@enumctr\\endcsname7\n \\expandafter\\settowidth\n \\csname leftmargin\\romannumeral\\@enumdepth\\endcsname\n {\\the\\@enLab\\hskip\\labelsep}%\n \\@enum@}\n\\def\\@enum@{\\list{{\\@enfont\\csname label\\@enumctr\\endcsname}}%\n {\\usecounter{\\@enumctr}\\def\\makelabel##1{\\hss\\llap{##1}}%\n \\ifnum \\@enumdepth>1\\setlength{\\topsep}{\\@@sep}\\else\n \\setlength{\\topsep}{\\@sep}\\fi\n \\ifnum \\@enumdepth>1\\setlength{\\itemsep}{0pt plus1pt minus1pt}%\n \\else \\setlength{\\itemsep}{\\@@sep}\\fi\n %\\setlength\\leftmargin{\\leftMargin}%%%{1.8em}\n \\setlength{\\parsep}{0pt plus1pt minus1pt}%\n \\setlength{\\parskip}{0pt plus1pt minus1pt}\n }}\n\n\\def\\endenumerate{\\par\\ifnum \\@enumdepth >1\\addvspace{\\@@sep}\\else\n \\addvspace{\\@sep}\\fi \\endlist}\n\n\\def\\sitem{\\@noitemargtrue\\@item[\\@itemlabel *]}\n\n\\def\\itemize{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@Itemize}{\\@Itemize[]}}\n\n\\def\\@Itemize[#1]{\\def\\next{#1}%\n \\ifnum \\@itemdepth >\\thr@@\\@toodeep\\else\n \\advance\\@itemdepth\\@ne\n \\ifx\\next\\@empty\\else\\expandafter\\def\\csname\n labelitem\\romannumeral\\the\\@itemdepth\\endcsname{#1}\\fi%\n \\edef\\@itemitem{labelitem\\romannumeral\\the\\@itemdepth}%\n \\expandafter\\list\\csname\\@itemitem\\endcsname\n {\\def\\makelabel##1{\\hss\\llap{##1}}}%\n \\fi}\n\\def\\newdefinition#1{%\n \\@ifnextchar[{\\@odfn{#1}}{\\@ndfn{#1}}}%]\n\\def\\@ndfn#1#2{%\n \\@ifnextchar[{\\@xndfn{#1}{#2}}{\\@yndfn{#1}{#2}}}\n\\def\\@xndfn#1#2[#3]{%\n \\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\@definecounter{#1}\\@newctr{#1}[#3]%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname the#1\\endcsname{%\n \\expandafter\\noexpand\\csname the#3\\endcsname \\@dfncountersep\n \\@dfncounter{#1}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@dfn{#1}{#2}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@enddefinition}}}\n\\def\\@yndfn#1#2{%\n \\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\@definecounter{#1}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname the#1\\endcsname{\\@dfncounter{#1}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@dfn{#1}{#2}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@enddefinition}}}\n\\def\\@odfn#1[#2]#3{%\n \\@ifundefined{c@#2}{\\@nocounterr{#2}}%\n {\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\global\\@namedef{the#1}{\\@nameuse{the#2}}\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@dfn{#2}{#3}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@enddefinition}}}}\n\\def\\@dfn#1#2{%\n \\refstepcounter{#1}%\n \\@ifnextchar[{\\@ydfn{#1}{#2}}{\\@xdfn{#1}{#2}}}\n\\def\\@xdfn#1#2{%\n \\@begindefinition{#2}{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}\\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\@ydfn#1#2[#3]{%\n \\@opargbegindefinition{#2}{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}{#3}\\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\@dfncounter#1{\\noexpand\\arabic{#1}}\n\\def\\@dfncountersep{.}\n\\def\\@begindefinition#1#2{\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{\\bfseries #1\\ #2.}]\\upshape}\n\\def\\@opargbegindefinition#1#2#3{\\trivlist\n \\item[\\hskip\\labelsep{\\bfseries #1\\ #2\\ (#3).}]\\upshape}\n\\def\\@enddefinition{\\endtrivlist}\n\n\\def\\@begintheorem#1#2{\\trivlist\n \\let\\baselinestretch\\@blstr\n \\item[\\hskip \\labelsep{\\bfseries #1\\ #2.}]\\itshape}\n\\def\\@opargbegintheorem#1#2#3{\\trivlist\n \\let\\baselinestretch\\@blstr\n \\item[\\hskip \\labelsep{\\bfseries #1\\ #2\\ (#3).}]\\itshape}\n\n\\def\\newproof#1{%\n \\@ifnextchar[{\\@oprf{#1}}{\\@nprf{#1}}}\n\\def\\@nprf#1#2{%\n \\@ifnextchar[{\\@xnprf{#1}{#2}}{\\@ynprf{#1}{#2}}}\n\\def\\@xnprf#1#2[#3]{%\n \\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\@definecounter{#1}\\@newctr{#1}[#3]%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname the#1\\endcsname{%\n \\expandafter\\noexpand\\csname the#3\\endcsname \\@prfcountersep\n \\@prfcounter{#1}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@prf{#1}{#2}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endproof}}}\n\\def\\@ynprf#1#2{%\n \\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\@definecounter{#1}%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\\csname the#1\\endcsname{\\@prfcounter{#1}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@prf{#1}{#2}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endproof}}}\n\\def\\@oprf#1[#2]#3{%\n \\@ifundefined{c@#2}{\\@nocounterr{#2}}%\n {\\expandafter\\@ifdefinable\\csname #1\\endcsname\n {\\global\\@namedef{the#1}{\\@nameuse{the#2}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{#1}{\\@prf{#2}{#3}}%\n \\global\\@namedef{end#1}{\\@endproof}}}}\n\\def\\@prf#1#2{%\n \\refstepcounter{#1}%\n \\@ifnextchar[{\\@yprf{#1}{#2}}{\\@xprf{#1}{#2}}}\n\\def\\@xprf#1#2{%\n \\@beginproof{#2}{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}\\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\@yprf#1#2[#3]{%\n \\@opargbeginproof{#2}{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}{#3}\\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\@prfcounter#1{\\noexpand\\arabic{#1}}\n\\def\\@prfcountersep{.}\n\\def\\@beginproof#1#2{\\trivlist\\let\\baselinestretch\\@blstr\n \\item[\\hskip \\labelsep{\\scshape #1.}]\\rmfamily}\n\\def\\@opargbeginproof#1#2#3{\\trivlist\\let\\baselinestretch\\@blstr\n \\item[\\hskip \\labelsep{\\scshape #1\\ (#3).}]\\rmfamily}\n\\def\\@endproof{\\endtrivlist}\n\\newcommand*{\\qed}{\\hbox{}\\hfill$\\Box$}\n\n\\@ifundefined{@biboptions}{\\xdef\\@biboptions{numbers}}{}\n\\InputIfFileExists{\\jobname.spl}{}{}\n\\ifnonatbib\\relax\\else\n \\RequirePackage[\\@biboptions]{natbib}\n\\fi\n\\newwrite\\splwrite\n\\immediate\\openout\\splwrite=\\jobname.spl\n\\def\\biboptions#1{\\def\\next{#1}\\immediate\\write\\splwrite{%\n \\string\\g@addto@macro\\string\\@biboptions{%\n ,\\expandafter\\strip@prefix\\meaning\\next}}}\n\n\\let\\baselinestretch=\\@blstr\n\\ifnum\\jtype=1\n \\RequirePackage{geometry}\n \\geometry{twoside,\n paperwidth=210mm,\n paperheight=297mm,\n textheight=562pt,\n textwidth=384pt,\n centering,\n headheight=50pt,\n headsep=12pt,\n footskip=12pt,\n footnotesep=24pt plus 2pt minus 12pt,\n }\n \\global\\let\\bibfont=\\footnotesize\n \\global\\bibsep=0pt\n \\if@twocolumn\\global\\@twocolumnfalse\\fi\n\\else\\ifnum\\jtype=3\n \\RequirePackage{geometry}\n \\geometry{twoside,\n paperwidth=210mm,\n paperheight=297mm,\n textheight=622pt,\n textwidth=468pt,\n centering,\n headheight=50pt,\n headsep=12pt,\n footskip=18pt,\n footnotesep=24pt plus 2pt minus 12pt,\n columnsep=2pc\n }\n \\global\\let\\bibfont=\\footnotesize\n \\global\\bibsep=0pt\n \\if@twocolumn\\input{fleqn.clo}\\fi\n\\else\\ifnum\\jtype=5\n \\RequirePackage{geometry}\n \\geometry{twoside,\n paperwidth=210mm,\n paperheight=297mm,\n textheight=682pt,\n textwidth=522pt,\n centering,\n headheight=50pt,\n headsep=12pt,\n footskip=18pt,\n footnotesep=24pt plus 2pt minus 12pt,\n columnsep=18pt\n }%\n \\global\\let\\bibfont=\\footnotesize\n \\global\\bibsep=0pt\n \\input{fleqn.clo}\n \\global\\@twocolumntrue\n%%\n%% End of option '5p'\n%%\n\\fi\\fi\\fi\n\\def\\journal#1{\\gdef\\@journal{#1}}\n \\let\\@journal\\@empty\n\\newenvironment{frontmatter}{}{\\maketitle}\n\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{%\n \\vskip\\abovecaptionskip\\footnotesize\n \\sbox\\@tempboxa{#1: #2}%\n \\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize\n #1: #2\\par\n \\else\n \\global \\@minipagefalse\n \\hb@xt@\\hsize{\\hfil\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n \\fi\n \\vskip\\belowcaptionskip}\n\n\\AtBeginDocument{\\@ifpackageloaded{hyperref}\n {\\def\\@linkcolor{blue}\n \\def\\@anchorcolor{blue}\n \\def\\@citecolor{blue}\n \\def\\@filecolor{blue}\n \\def\\@urlcolor{blue}\n \\def\\@menucolor{blue}\n \\def\\@pagecolor{blue}\n\\begingroup\n \\@makeother\\`%\n \\@makeother\\=%\n \\edef\\x{%\n \\edef\\noexpand\\x{%\n \\endgroup\n \\noexpand\\toks@{%\n \\catcode 96=\\noexpand\\the\\catcode`\\noexpand\\`\\relax\n \\catcode 61=\\noexpand\\the\\catcode`\\noexpand\\=\\relax\n }%\n }%\n \\noexpand\\x\n }%\n\\x\n\\@makeother\\`\n\\@makeother\\=\n}{}}\n%%\n\\def\\appendixname{Appendix }\n\\renewcommand\\appendix{\\par\n \\setcounter{section}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{equation}{0}\n \\gdef\\thefigure{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\arabic{figure}}%\n \\gdef\\thetable{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\arabic{table}}%\n \\gdef\\thesection{\\appendixname~\\@Alph\\c@section}%\n \\@addtoreset{equation}{section}%\n \\gdef\\theequation{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\arabic{equation}}%\n \\addtocontents{toc}{\\string\\let\\string\\numberline\\string\\tmptocnumberline}{}{}\n}\n\n%%%% \\numberline width calculation for appendix.\n\\newdimen\\appnamewidth\n\\def\\tmptocnumberline#1{%\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\appendixname}\n \\appnamewidth=\\wd0\n \\addtolength\\appnamewidth{2.5pc}\n \\hb@xt@\\appnamewidth{#1\\hfill}\n}\n\n%% Added for work with amsrefs.sty\n\n\\@ifpackageloaded{amsrefs}%\n {}\n {%\\let\\bibsection\\relax%\n \\AtBeginDocument{\\def\\cites@b#1#2,#3{%\n \\begingroup[%\n \\toks@{\\InnerCite{#2}#1}%\n \\ifx\\@empty#3\\@xp\\@gobble\\fi\n \\cites@c#3%\n}}}\n%%\n%% Added for avoiding clash with cleveref.sty\n\\@ifpackageloaded{cleveref}%\n {}\n {\\def\\tnotetext[#1]#2{\\g@addto@macro\\@tnotes{%\n \\refstepcounter{tnote}%\n \\immediate\\write\\@auxout{\\string\\Newlabel{#1}{\\thetnote}}\n \\def\\thefootnote{\\ifcase\\c@tnote\\or$\\star$\\or$\\star\\star$\\fi}%\n \\footnotetext{#2}}}\n%%%\n \\def\\fntext[#1]#2{\\g@addto@macro\\@fnotes{%\n \\refstepcounter{fnote}%\n \\immediate\\write\\@auxout{\\string\\Newlabel{#1}{\\thefnote}}\n \\def\\thefootnote{\\thefnote}%\n \\global\\setcounter{footnote}{\\c@fnote}%\n \\footnotetext{#2}}}\n%%%\n \\def\\cortext[#1]#2{\\g@addto@macro\\@cornotes{%\n \\refstepcounter{cnote}%\n \\immediate\\write\\@auxout{\\string\\Newlabel{#1}{\\thecnote}}\n \\def\\thefootnote{\\ifcase\\c@cnote\\or$\\ast$\\or\n $\\ast\\ast$\\fi}%\n \\footnotetext{#2}}}\n}\n\n\\def\\textmarker#1#2{\\textcolor{#1}{#2}}%*%\n\n\\endinput\n%%\n%% End of file `elsarticle.cls'.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: jcomp.sty\n================================================\n%%\n%% This is file `jcomp.sty',\n%% generated with the docstrip utility.\n%%\n%% Copyright 2017 Elsevier Ltd\n%% \n%% This file is part of the 'Elsarticle Bundle'.\n%% -------------------------------------------\n%% \n%% It may be distributed under the conditions of the LaTeX Project Public\n%% License, either version 1.2 of this license or (at your option) any\n%% later version. The latest version of this license is in\n%% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt\n%% and version 1.2 or later is part of all distributions of LaTeX\n%% version 1999/12/01 or later.\n%% \n%%\n%% $Id: jcomp.sty 99 2017-07-04 06:26:43Z apu.v $\n%%\n\\def\\RCSfile{jcomp}%\n\\def\\RCSversion{0.1}%\n\\def\\RCSdate{2017/06/24}%\n\\def\\@shortjnl{jcp}\n\\def\\@journal{Journal of Computational Physics}\n\\def\\@company{Elsevier Inc.}\n\\def\\@issn{0021-9991}\n\\def\\@shortjid{jcomp}\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1995/12/01]\n\n\\@ifclassloaded{elsarticle}\n{\\typeout{elsarticle.cls is loaded...}}\n{\\errmessage{This package will work only with \n\t\telsarticle.cls. So please load elsarticle.cls \n\t\tand try.}}\n\n\\@ifpackageloaded{hyperref}{}\n{\\def\\href#1#2{#2}} \n\n\\AtBeginDocument{\\@twosidetrue\\@mparswitchtrue}\n\n\\def\\@verso{}\n\\gdef\\verso#1{\\gdef\\@verso{#1}}\n\n\\gdef\\baselinestretch{1}%\n\\gdef\\belowabstractskip{10pt}%\n\n\\RequirePackage{geometry}\n\\geometry{twoside,\n\tpaperwidth=192mm,\n\tpaperheight=262mm,\n\ttextheight=635.35pt,\n\ttextwidth=467.75pt,\n\tinner=37pt,\n\touter=42pt,\n\ttop=52pt,\n\tbottom=52pt,\n\theadheight=12pt,\n\theadsep=12pt,\n\tfootskip=16pt,\n\tfootnotesep=28pt plus 2pt minus 6pt,\n\tcolumnsep=18pt\n}\n\\global\\let\\bibfont=\\footnotesize\n\\global\\bibsep=0pt\n\\input{fleqn.clo}\n%\\ifpreprint\n%\\else\n% \\global\\@twocolumntrue\n%\\fi\n\n\\long\\def\\elsputbox(#1)(#2)[#3]#4{%\n\t\\unitlength=1mm%\n\t\\fboxsep=-\\fboxrule\n\t\\fboxrule0pt%\n\t\\fboxsep0pt%\n\t\\ifvmode\\leavevmode\\fi\\smash{\\put(#1)%\n\t\t{\\makebox(#2)[#3]{\\fbox{#4}}}}}\n\n\\long\\def\\elsptputbox(#1)(#2)[#3]#4{%\n\t\\unitlength=1pt%\n\t\\fboxsep=-\\fboxrule\n\t\\fboxrule0pt%\n\t\\fboxsep0pt%\n\t\\ifvmode\\leavevmode\\fi\\smash{\\put(#1)%\n\t\t{\\makebox(#2)[#3]{\\fbox{#4}}}}}\n\n\\usepackage{multirow}\n\\usepackage{color}\n\n\\definecolor{gray10}{gray}{.9}\n\n\\AtBeginDocument{\n\t\\def\\elsarticletitlealign{flushleft}\n}\n\n%dsrno\n%%\n\\def\\snm#1{\\textcolor{red}{#1}}\n\n\\def\\tnotemark[#1]{\\@for\\mytmark:=#1\\do{%\n\t\t\\@ifundefined{X@\\mytmark}%\n\t\t{\\expandafter\\def\\csname X@\\mytmark\\endcsname{0}}%\n\t\t{}%\n\t\t\\expandafter\\ifcase\\csname X@\\mytmark\\endcsname\\or$^{\\star}$\\or\n\t\t$^{,\\star\\star}$\\fi\n\t}%\n}\n\n\\def\\elstitleheaderwidth{\\textwidth}%165mm\n\\def\\titleboxawidth{140mm}\n\\def\\elsjnllogowidth{20mm}\n\\def\\titleblocksep{4mm}%\n\\def\\titlegrayboxwidth{112.5mm}\n\\def\\titlegrayboxheight{20.75mm}\n\\def\\elsjnllogoheight{25.24mm}\n\\def\\elstitleboxcolor{gray10}\n\\def\\ScienceDirect{\\href{http://www.sciencedirect.com}{ScienceDirect}}\n\\if@twocolumn%\n\\def\\abovestmtitleheaderskip{-16pt}%\n\\else%\n\\def\\abovestmtitleheaderskip{-28pt}%\n\\fi%\n\\def\\crossmarkskip{25mm}\n\\def\\jnllogo{jcomp-logo}%%dsr\n\\def\\elslogo{elsevier-logo}%%dsr\n\\def\\jnlurl#1{\\gdef\\@jnlurl{#1}}%%dsr\n\\gdef\\@jnlurl{www.elsevier.com/locate/jcp}%%dsr\n\n\\def\\elstitleheadboxa#1#2#3{%\n\t\\minipage[b][][t]{#1}%\n\t\\hrule width #1 height 0.3pt%\n\t\\vspace*{6pt}%\n\t{\\raisebox{-3pt}{\\includegraphics%\n\t\t\t{\\elslogo}\\hspace*{\\titleblocksep}}}%\n\t\\colorbox{\\elstitleboxcolor}{% \n\t\t\\parbox[b][#2]{#3}{\\elstitlejnldetails}}%\n\t\\endminipage%\n}\n\n\\def\\elstitlejnldetails{%\n\t\\minipage[b][23mm][b]{\\titlegrayboxwidth}%\n\t\\centering%\n\t\\parbox[b]{\\titlegrayboxwidth}{% \n\t\t\\centering\\sffamily%\n\t\t\\fontsize{8.5pt}{9.6pt}\\fontseries{m}\\selectfont% \n\t\tContents lists available at \\ScienceDirect}\\\\[15pt]%\n\t{\\fontsize{15pt}{18pt}\\selectfont%\n\t\t\\@journal%\n\t}\\\\[15pt]%\n\t\\parbox[b]{\\titlegrayboxwidth}%\n\t{\\centering\\sffamily\\fontsize{8.5pt}{9.6pt}\\fontseries{m}\\selectfont% \n\t\tjournal homepage:~%\n\t\t\\href{http://\\@jnlurl}{\\@jnlurl}%\n\t\t\\vspace*{0pt}%\n\t}%\n\t\\endminipage}\n\n\\def\\elsjnllogoboxb#1#2{%\n\t\\minipage[b][#2][b]{#1}%\n\t{\\fboxrule=0.2pt\\fboxsep=0pt\\fbox{%\n\t\t\t\\includegraphics[width=20.22mm,height=25.47mm]{\\jnllogo}}}%\n\t\\endminipage}\n\n\\def\\titleheaderfont{\\fontsize{8pt}{8pt}\\selectfont}\n\n\\def\\stmtitleheader{%\n\t{\\parskip=0pt%\n\t\t\\parindent=0pt%\n\t\t\\vspace*{\\abovestmtitleheaderskip}%\n\t\t\\minipage[t][][t]{\\elstitleheaderwidth}%\n\t\t\\par\\vspace*{9pt}%\n\t\t\\elstitleheadboxa{\\titleboxawidth}%\n\t\t{\\titlegrayboxheight}{\\titlegrayboxwidth}%\n\t\t\\hspace*{\\dimexpr(\\titleblocksep-0.3pt)}%\n\t\t\\elsjnllogoboxb{\\elsjnllogowidth}{\\elsjnllogoheight}%\n\t\t\\par\\vspace*{-3pt}% \n\t\t\\rule{\\textwidth}{3pt}% \n\t\t\\vspace*{18pt}%\n\t\t\\endminipage%\n\t}%\n} \n\n\\long\\def\\getSpaceLeft{%\\global\\@twocolumnfalse%\n\t\\global\\setbox0=\\vbox{\\hsize=\\textwidth%\n\t\t\\par\\vspace*{12pt}%\n\t\t\\MaketitleBox%\n\t\t\\MakeabstractBox}%\n\t\\global\\setbox1=\\vbox{\\hsize=\\textwidth\n\t\t\\let\\footnotetext\\FNtext\n\t\t\\printFirstPageNotes}%\n\t\\xdef\\noteheight{\\the\\ht1}%\n\t\\xdef\\titleheight{\\the\\ht0}%\n\t\\@tempdima=\\vsize\n\t\\advance\\@tempdima-\\noteheight\n\t\\advance\\@tempdima-1\\baselineskip\n\t\\xdef\\savefpageheight{\\the\\@tempdima}% \n\t\\setbox2=\\vbox{\\titlespancalculator{\\titleheight}%\n\t\t{\\savefpageheight}{\\textheight}{0}}%\n}\n\n%%Maketitle for jcomp\n\\if@twocolumn\n\\def\\maketitle{%\n\t\\iflongmktitle\\getSpaceLeft\n\t\\ifdim\\noteheight>0pt%\n\t\\advance\\@tempdima-1.35\\baselineskip\n\t\\fi%\n\t\\setcounter{cnote}{0}% \n\t\\setcounter{tnote}{0}%\n\t\\setcounter{fnote}{0}%\n\t\\global\\setbox\\els@boxa=\\vsplit0 to \\@tempdima\n\t\\box\\els@boxa%\n\t\\printFirstPageNotes%\n\t\\par\\resetTitleCounters\n\t\\thispagestyle{pprintTitle}%\n\t\\ifnum\\savetitlepagespan>1\\relax%\n\t\\myfor{2}{\\savetitlepagespan}{%\n\t\t\\global\\setbox\\els@boxb=\\vsplit0 to \\textheight%\\@tempdima \n\t\t\\twocolumn[\\unvbox\\els@boxb]}\n\t\\else%\n\t\\fi% \n\t\\twocolumn[\\unvbox0]%\n\t\\else\n\t\\twocolumn[\\vspace*{10pt}\\finalMaketitle]\\printFirstPageNotes\n\t\\fi\n\t\\gdef\\thefootnote{\\arabic{footnote}}%\n\t\\ifpreprint%\n\t\\global\\advance\\baselineskip by 6pt%\n\t\\fi%\n}%\n\\else\n\\def\\maketitle{%\n\t\\iflongmktitle\\getSpaceLeft\n\t\\ifdim\\noteheight>0pt%\n\t\\advance\\@tempdima-1.35\\baselineskip\n\t\\fi%\n\t\\setcounter{cnote}{0}%\n\t\\setcounter{tnote}{0}% \n\t\\setcounter{fnote}{0}% \n\t\\global\\setbox\\els@boxa=\\vsplit0 to \\@tempdima\n\t\\printFirstPageNotes% \n\t\\unvbox\\els@boxa%\n\t\\par\\resetTitleCounters\n\t\\thispagestyle{pprintTitle}%\n\t\\ifnum\\savetitlepagespan>1\\relax%\n\t\\myfor{2}{\\savetitlepagespan}{%\n\t\t\\global\\setbox\\els@boxb=\\vsplit0 to \\textheight%\\@tempdima \n\t\t\\unvbox\\els@boxb}\n\t\\else%\n\t\\fi% \n\t\\unvbox0%\n\t\\else\n\t\\finalMaketitle\\printFirstPageNotes\n\t\\fi\n\t\\gdef\\thefootnote{\\arabic{footnote}}%\n\t\\ifpreprint%\n\t\\global\\advance\\baselineskip by 6pt%\n\t\\fi%\n}%\n\\fi%\n\n\n%% Title page header\n\\def\\ps@JCOMPTitle{%\n\t\\def\\@oddhead{%%dsr-start\n%\t\t\\stmtitleheader \n%\t\t{\\titleheaderfont%\n%\t\t\t\\hfil\\@journal\\ (\\the\\year)\\hfil}% \n\t{\\titleheaderfont%\n\t\t\\hfil {\\noindent}\\rule[10pt]{\\textwidth}{0.05em} \\hfil}% \n\t}%dsr-end\n\t\\let\\@evenhead\\@empty\n\t\\def\\@oddfoot{%\n\t\t\\ifpreprint%\n\t\t\\ifnopreprintline\\relax\\else%\n\t\tPreprint submitted to \\ifx\\@journal\\@empty%\n\t\tElsevier%\n\t\t\\else\\@journal\\fi\\hfill\\@date%\n\t\t\\fi%\n\t\t\\fi%\n\t}\n\t\\let\\@evenfoot\\@oddfoot\n}\n\n\\let\\ps@pprintTitle\\ps@JCOMPTitle\n\n\\def\\ps@headings{%\n%\t\\def\\@evenhead{{\\titleheaderfont\\rlap{\\thepage}%\n%\t\t\t\\hfill\\@verso\\,/\\,\\@journal\\ (\\the\\year)\\hfill\\mbox{}}}\n%\t\\def\\@oddhead{{\\titleheaderfont\\mbox{}%\n%\t\t\t\\hfill\\@verso\\,/\\,\\@journal\\ (\\the\\year)\\hfill\\llap{\\thepage}}}\n\t\\def\\@evenhead{{\\titleheaderfont\\rlap{\\thepage}%\n\t\t\t\\hfill\\@verso\\hfill\\mbox{}}}\n\t\\def\\@oddhead{{\\titleheaderfont\\mbox{}%\n\t\t\t\\hfill\\@verso\\hfill\\llap{\\thepage}}}\n%\\def\\@evenhead{{\\titleheaderfont\\rlap{\\thepage}%\n%\t}}%\\hfill\\@verso\\,/\\,\\@journal\\ (\\the\\year)\\hfill\\mbox{}}} %dsr\n%\t\\def\\@oddhead{{\\titleheaderfont\\mbox{} \\hfill\\llap{\\thepage} }}\n%\t\t\t %\\hfill\\@verso\\,/\\,\\@journal\\ (\\the\\year)\\hfill\\mbox{}}} \n\t\\let\\@oddfoot\\relax\n\t\\let\\@evenfoot\\@oddfoot\n}\n\n% Header for other than title page.\n\\pagestyle{headings}\n\n% History info\n\\let\\@received\\@empty\n\\let\\@finalform\\@empty\n\\let\\@accepted\\@empty\n\\let\\@availableonline\\@empty\n\\let\\@communicated\\@empty\n\\def\\received#1{\\gdef\\@received{#1}}\n\\def\\finalform#1{\\gdef\\@finalform{#1}}\n\\def\\accepted#1{\\gdef\\@accepted{#1}}\n\\def\\availableonline#1{\\gdef\\@availableonline{#1}}\n\\def\\communicated#1{\\gdef\\@communicated{#1}}\n\n\\def\\receivedhead{Received}\n\\def\\acceptedhead{Accepted}\n\\def\\finalformhead{Received in final form}\n\\def\\availableonlinehead{Available online}\n\\def\\communicatedhead{Communicated by}\n\n%%dsr2\n\n% Article info\n\\def\\articleinfobox{%\n\t\\parbox[t]{.25\\textwidth}{%\n%\t\t\\vspace*{0pt}%dsr-start\n%\t\t% \\hrule% \n%\t\t% \\vspace*{6pt}% \n%\t\t\\fontsize{8pt}{10pt}\\selectfont%\n%\t\t\\textit{Article history}:\\\\\n%\t\t\\ifx\\@received\\@empty\\relax\n%\t\t\\else\n%\t\t\\receivedhead~\\@received\\\\\n%\t\t\\fi\n%\t\t\\ifx\\@finalform\\@empty\\relax\n%\t\t\\else\n%\t\t\\finalformhead~\\@finalform\\\\\n%\t\t\\fi\n%\t\t\\ifx\\@accepted\\@empty\\relax\n%\t\t\\else\n%\t\t\\acceptedhead~\\@accepted\\\\\n%\t\t\\fi\n%\t\t\\ifx\\@availableonline\\@empty\\relax\n%\t\t\\else\n%\t\t\\availableonlinehead~\\@availableonline\n%\t\t\\fi\n%\t\t\\ifx\\@communicated\\@empty\\relax\n%\t\t\\\\[-2pt]\n%\t\t\\else\n%\t\t\\par\n%\t\t\\vspace*{10pt}\n%\t\t\\communicatedhead~\\@communicated\n%\t\t\\vspace*{12pt}\n%\t\t\\fi\n%\t\t\\hrule width 0.285\\textwidth\n%\t\t\\vspace*{1pc} %dsr-end\n\t\t\\unhbox\\keybox}\n}\n\n% Preprint Maketitle\n\\long\\def\\pprintMaketitle{\\MaketitleBox}%\n\n\n\n% Maketitle \n\\long\\def\\MaketitleBox{%\n\t\\resetTitleCounters\n%\t\\stmtitleheader%\n\t\\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n\t\\begin{\\elsarticletitlealign}%\n\t\t\\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n\t\t% \\vspace*{7.5pc}\n\t\t\\Large\\@title\\par\\vskip18pt\n\t\t\\normalsize\n\t\t\\ifdoubleblind\n\t\t% \\vspace*{2pc}\n\t\t\\else\n\t\t\\elsauthors\\par\\vskip10pt\n\t\t{\\footnotesize\\itshape\\elsaddress}\\par\\vskip12pt\n\t\t\\fi\n%\t\t\\vspace*{-\\baselineskip}%\n\t\\end{\\elsarticletitlealign}%\n\t% \\vspace*{2pc}\n\t% \\printFirstPageNotes%\n}\n\n%\\long\\def\\MakeabstractBox{%\n%%\t\\@tempdima=.335\\textwidth%\n%%\t\\elsptputbox(-\\strip@pt\\@tempdima,0)(0,0)[tl]{\\MakeartinfoBox}%\n%%\t\\elsptputbox(0,0)(0,0)[tl]{\\MakeartinfoBox}%\n%\t{%\n%%\t\t\t\t\\leftskip=\\@tempdima%\n%\t\t\\rule{\\textwidth}{.2pt}\\\\[8pt]%\\vskip10pt\n%\t\t\\noindent\n%\t\t\\begin{tabular*}{\\textwidth}{@{}l@{}p{\\textwidth}}\n%\t\t\t% \\hspace*{7pt}&A~B~S~T~R~A~C~T\\\\[8pt]\n%%\t\t\t\\multicolumn{2}{@{}l@{}}{A~B~S~T~R~A~C~T}\\\\[8pt]\n%%\t\t\t\\hspace*{7pt}\\normalsize\\bfseries\\boldmath Abstract\\\\[8pt]\n%\t\t\t\\multicolumn{}{@{}l@{}}{\\normalsize\\bfseries Abstract}\\\\[12pt] \n%\t\t\\end{tabular*}\n%\t\t\\par\\noindent%\n%\t\t\\unvbox\\absbox%\n%\t\t\\vspace*{10pt}%\n%\t\t\\noindent\n%\t\t\\unhbox\\keybox\n%\t\t\\mbox{}\\\\[\\belowabstractskip]%\\rule{.665\\textwidth}{.2pt}%\\vskip10pt% \n%\t\t\\noindent\\hrule%\n%\t\t\\if@twocolumn%\n%\t\t\\vspace*{24pt}%\n%\t\t\\fi% \n%\t} \n%}\n%%% modify by Chuan\n\\long\\def\\MakeabstractBox{%\n\t%\t\\@tempdima=.335\\textwidth%\n\t%\t\\elsptputbox(-\\strip@pt\\@tempdima,0)(0,0)[tl]{\\MakeartinfoBox}%\n\t%\t\\elsptputbox(0,0)(0,0)[tl]{\\MakeartinfoBox}%\n\t{%\n\t\t%\t\t\t\t\\leftskip=\\@tempdima%\n\t\t\\rule{\\textwidth}{.2pt}\\\\[8pt]%\\vskip10pt\n\t\t\\noindent\n\t\t\\begin{tabular*}{\\textwidth}{@{}l@{}p{\\textwidth}}\n\t\t\t\\multicolumn{2}{@{}l@{}}{\\normalsize\\bfseries Abstract}\\\\[12pt] \n\t\t\\end{tabular*}\n\t\t\\par\\noindent%\n\t\t\\unvbox\\absbox%\n\t\t\\vspace*{10pt}%\n\t\t\\noindent\n\t\t\\unhbox\\keybox\n\t\t\\mbox{}\\\\[\\belowabstractskip]%\\rule{.665\\textwidth}{.2pt}%\\vskip10pt% \n\t\t\\if@twocolumn%\n\t\t\\vspace*{24pt}%\n\t\t\\fi% \n\t} \n}\n\n\\long\\def\\MakeartinfoBox{%\n\t\\vtop{\\hsize=.285\\textwidth%\n%\t\t\\noindent\\rule{.285\\textwidth}{.2pt}\\\\[10pt]%\\vskip10pt%\n%\t\t\\noindent\\rule{\\textwidth}{.2pt}\\\\[10pt]%\\vskip10pt%\n\t\t\\vskip 10pt\n\t\t\\noindent\n%\t\t\\begin{tabular*}{.285\\textwidth}{@{}l@{}p{.285\\textwidth}}\n%\t\t\t% \\hspace*{7pt}&A~R~T~I~C~L~E~~I~N~F~O\\\\[8pt]%\n%\t\t\t\\multicolumn{2}{@{}l@{}}{A~R~T~I~C~L~E\\mbox{~~~}I~N~F~O}\\\\[8pt] \n%\t\t\t\\hline\\\\[-8pt]%\n%\t\t\\end{tabular*}%\n\t\t\\par%\n\t\t\\noindent\\articleinfobox\\\\[3pt]%\\hrule\n\t}\n}\n\n%\\long\\def\\MakeabstractBox{%\n%\t\\@tempdima=.335\\textwidth%\n%\t\\elsptputbox(-\\strip@pt\\@tempdima,0)(0,0)[tl]{\\MakeartinfoBox}%\n%\t{%\n%%\t\t\\leftskip=\\@tempdima%\n%\t\t\\rule{.665\\textwidth}{.2pt}\\\\[10pt]%\\vskip10pt\n%\t\t\\noindent\n%\t\t\\begin{tabular*}{.665\\textwidth}{@{}l@{}p{.665\\textwidth}}\n%\t\t\t% \\hspace*{7pt}&A~B~S~T~R~A~C~T\\\\[8pt]\n%\t\t\t\\multicolumn{2}{@{}l@{}}{A~B~S~T~R~A~C~T}\\\\[8pt]\n%\t\t\t\\hline\\\\[-8pt]\n%\t\t\\end{tabular*}\n%\t\t\\par\\noindent%\n%\t\t\\unvbox\\absbox%\n%\t\t\\mbox{}\\\\[\\belowabstractskip]%\\rule{.665\\textwidth}{.2pt}%\\vskip10pt% \n%\t\t\\noindent\\hrule%\n%\t\t\\if@twocolumn%\n%\t\t\\vspace*{24pt}%\n%\t\t\\fi% \n%\t} \n%}\n%\n%\\long\\def\\MakeartinfoBox{%\n%\t\\vtop{\\hsize=.285\\textwidth%\n%\t\t\\noindent\\rule{.285\\textwidth}{.2pt}\\\\[10pt]%\\vskip10pt%\n%\t\t\\noindent\n%\t\t\\begin{tabular*}{.285\\textwidth}{@{}l@{}p{.285\\textwidth}}\n%\t\t\t% \\hspace*{7pt}&A~R~T~I~C~L~E~~I~N~F~O\\\\[8pt]%\n%\t\t\t\\multicolumn{2}{@{}l@{}}{A~R~T~I~C~L~E\\mbox{~~~}I~N~F~O}\\\\[8pt] \n%\t\t\t\\hline\\\\[-8pt]%\n%\t\t\\end{tabular*}%\n%\t\t\\par%\n%\t\t\\noindent\\articleinfobox\\\\[3pt]%\\hrule\n%\t}\n%}\n\n\\long\\def\\finalMaketitle{%\n\t\\resetTitleCounters\n\t\\def\\baselinestretch{1}%\n\t\\MaketitleBox%\n\t\\MakeabstractBox%\n\t\\thispagestyle{JCOMPTitle}% dsr\n\t\\gdef\\thefootnote{\\arabic{footnote}}%\n}\n\n\n\\def\\printFirstPageNotes{%\n\t\\def\\snm##1{##1}%\n\t\\iflongmktitle\n\t\\let\\columnwidth=\\textwidth\\fi\n\t\\ifdoubleblind\n\t\\else\n\t\\ifx\\@tnotes\\@empty\\else\\@tnotes\\fi\n\t\\ifx\\@nonumnotes\\@empty\\else\\@nonumnotes\\fi\n\t\\ifx\\@cornotes\\@empty\\else\\@cornotes\\fi\n\t\\ifx\\@elseads\\@empty\\relax\\else\n\t\\let\\thefootnote\\relax\n\t\\footnotetext{\\ifnum\\theead=1\\relax\n\t\t\\textit{e-mail:\\space}\\else\n\t\t\\textit{e-mail:\\space}\\fi\n\t\t\\@elseads}\\fi\n\t\\ifx\\@elsuads\\@empty\\relax\\else\n\t\\let\\thefootnote\\relax\n\t\\footnotetext{\\textit{URL:\\space}%\n\t\t\\@elsuads}\\fi\n\t\\fi\n\t\\ifx\\@fnotes\\@empty\\else\\@fnotes\\fi\n\t\\iflongmktitle\\if@twocolumn\n\t\\let\\columnwidth=\\Columnwidth\\fi\\fi\n}\n\n% Abstract\n\\renewenvironment{abstract}{%\n\t\\global\\setbox\\absbox=\\vtop\\bgroup%\n\t\\hsize=\\textwidth%\n%\t\\leftskip=.335\\textwidth%%dsr\n\t\\noindent\\unskip\\ignorespaces%\n\t% \\hskip-1pt%\n}\n{\\mbox{} %dsr-start\n\t%\\newline%\n\t%\\mbox{~}\\hfill %\\copyright~\\the\\year\\ %\n%\tElsevier~Inc.~All~rights~reserved. %dsr-end\n\t\\egroup%\n}%\n\n% Keyword\n\\def\\keyword{%\n\t%\\def\\sep{\\newline}%\n\t\\def\\sep{\\unskip\\ignorespaces,\\space}%\n\t\\def\\MSC{\\@ifnextchar[{\\@MSC}{\\@MSC[2000]}}%\n%\t \\def\\@MSC[##1]{\\leavevmode\\hbox {\\it ##1~MSC:}\\newline}%\n\t\\def\\@MSC[##1]{\\leavevmode\\hbox {\\it ##1~MSC:}~}%\n\t\\def\\JEL{\\newline\\leavevmode\\hbox {\\it JEL:\\space}}%\n\t\\def\\KWD{%\n%\t\t\\vspace*{10pt}\\newline\n% \\leavevmode\\hbox {\\it Keywords:}\\newline %}%\n\t {\\it \\normalsize \\bfseries Keywords:}~ }%\n%\\global\\setbox\\keybox=\\hbox\\bgroup\\hsize=\\textwidth%\n\\global\\setbox\\keybox=\\hbox\\bgroup\\hsize=\\textwidth%\n\\normalsize\n%\\fontsize{8pt}{10pt}\n\\selectfont%\n\\parskip\\z@%\n\\noindent%\n\\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\endkeyword{\\egroup}\n\n%% Other customization\n\n% Enumerate\n\\def\\labelenumii{\\labelenumi.\\arabic{enumii}}\n\n% Caption\n\\def\\figurename{Fig.}\n\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{%\n\\vskip\\abovecaptionskip\\footnotesize\\bfseries\n\\sbox\\@tempboxa{#1.~#2}%\n\\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize\n#1.~#2\\par\n\\else\n\\global \\@minipagefalse\n\\hb@xt@\\hsize{\\hfil\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n\\fi\n\\vskip\\belowcaptionskip}\n\n%\\AtBeginDocument{\\ifpreprint\n% \\advance\\baselineskip by 6pt\n%\\fi}\n\n%\\def\\TM{$^{\\rm TM}$}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main_clean.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[times,final,11pt,compress]{elsarticle}\n\n\\usepackage{jcomp}\n\n\\usepackage{caption, subcaption}%\n\n\\captionsetup[table]{justification=centering}\n\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{amssymb}\n\\usepackage{amsfonts}\n\\usepackage{amsthm}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n%\\usepackage{cite}\n\\usepackage{mathrsfs}\n\\usepackage{epsfig}\n\\usepackage{enumerate}\n\\usepackage{enumitem}\n\\usepackage{extarrows}\n\\usepackage{flafter}\n\\usepackage{float} \n\\usepackage{graphicx,wrapfig}\n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\usepackage{leftidx}\n\\usepackage{lscape}\n%\\usepackage{cite}\n\\usepackage{multicol}\n\\usepackage{multirow}\n\\usepackage{pgfplots}\n\\usepackage{setspace}\n\\usepackage{tikz}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\definecolor{mygreen}{rgb}{0,0.45,0}\n\\usetikzlibrary{arrows,shapes,chains}\n\\usetikzlibrary{graphs, positioning, quotes, shapes.geometric}\n\n\\usepackage{bm}\n\n\\allowdisplaybreaks\n\n%%===================Math Style\n\\renewcommand{\\theequation}{\\thesection.\\arabic{equation}}\n\\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]\n\\newtheorem{proposition}{Proposition}[section]\n\\newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}[section]\n\\newtheorem{corollary}{Corollary}[section]\n\\newtheorem{remark}{Remark}\n\\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}\n\\theoremstyle{remark}\n\\newtheorem{example}{\\bf Example}[]\n\n% \\usepackage{hyperref}\n% \\usepackage{url}\n\n\n\\begin{document}\n\t\n\t\\begin{frontmatter}\n\t\t\\title{{\\bf GQL-Based Physical-Constraint-Preserving High-Order Finite Difference Schemes for Special Relativistic Hydrodynamics in Arbitrary Dimensions}}\n\t\t\\author[1]{Linfeng Xu}\n\t\t\\ead{xulf2022@mail.sustech.edu.cn}\n\t\t\\author[2]{Shengrong Ding}\n\t\t\\ead{dingshr7@mail.sysu.edu.cn}\n\t\t\\author[1,3]{Kailiang Wu\\corref{cor1}}\n\t\t\\ead{wukl@sustech.edu.cn}\n\t\t\n\t\t\\address[1]{Department of Mathematics, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, China}\n\t\t\\address[2]{School of Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518107, China}\n \\address[3]{Shenzhen International Center for Mathematics, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, China}\n\n\t\t\n\t\t\\cortext[cor1]{Corresponding author.}\n\n\t\t\n \n\\begin{abstract}\n\tHigh-order accurate simulations of special relativistic hydrodynamics (RHD) are prone to numerical breakdown if intrinsic physical constraints (positive rest-mass density/pressure and subluminal velocity) are violated near strong discontinuities. In this work, we develop a robust and efficient physical-constraint-preserving (PCP) flux-limiting framework for high-order schemes, using finite-difference WENO as a representative example. By leveraging the geometric quasilinearization (GQL) representation, which equivalently reformulates the nonlinear RHD constraints into a family of linear inequalities, we integrate a Zalesak-type Flux-Corrected Transport (FCT) update into a scalar-style limiter that acts directly on conservative variables.\tA critical innovation is the explicit, non-iterative determination of limiting parameters via a rational stereographic parameterization of the GQL normal vector. This technique transforms the required worst-case minimization over auxiliary variables into a generalized Rayleigh-quotient formulation, allowing the optimal parameters to be obtained by solving small symmetric eigenvalue problems ($2\\times2$ in 1D; $(d+1)\\times(d+1)$ in $d$ dimensions). Relaxed variants are further introduced to reduce computational costs in multidimensions while retaining the PCP guarantee. Extensive numerical benchmarks ranging from 1D to 3D, including ultra-relativistic Riemann problems and astrophysical jets, demonstrate that the proposed method robustly enforces physical admissibility, sharply resolves discontinuities, and maintains design-order accuracy for smooth solutions.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\\begin{keyword}\n\\textbf{Keywords:}\tspecial relativistic hydrodynamics \\sep physical-constraints-preserving \\sep flux-corrected transport \\sep geometric quasilinearization (GQL) \\sep high-order accuracy \\sep WENO. \n\\end{keyword}\n\t\t\n%\\noindent{\\bf MSC codes.}\\quad65M12\\sep 49M15\\sep 76Y05\\sep 35L65\n\t\t\n\t\\end{frontmatter}\n\t\n\t\\singlespacing\n\n % --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\t\n\\section{Introduction}\n\\setcounter{equation}{0}\n\n\nRelativistic hydrodynamics (RHD) provides a fundamental description of fluid motion at velocities approaching the speed of light and plays a central role in astrophysics, high-energy physics, and cosmology. \nThe governing equations feature strong nonlinearities and, in many practically relevant regimes, extremely large Lorentz factors; as a result, analytical solutions are rare and high-fidelity numerical simulation becomes indispensable for elucidating the dynamics of relativistic flows. \nCompared with the nonrelativistic Euler equations, RHD exhibits a more intricate and nonlinearly coupled relationship between conservative and primitive variables, which poses additional challenges for designing robust, accurate, and efficient numerical methods.\n\nEarly numerical investigations date back to \\cite{may1966hydrodynamic,wilson1972numerical}, where finite-difference discretizations augmented by artificial viscosity were employed in Lagrangian or Eulerian coordinates. Over the past decades, a wide range of high-resolution and high-order methods have been developed for RHD, including finite-volume, finite-difference, and discontinuous Galerkin (DG) approaches; see, e.g., \\cite{chen2021second, radice2012thc, WuTang2015, radice2011discontinuous, zhao2013runge}. To further enhance the resolution of discontinuities and multiscale structures, adaptive mesh refinement and adaptive moving-mesh techniques have also been incorporated into RHD simulations \\cite{2006Zhang,he2012adaptive1}.\n\n\n\n\n\nA central difficulty in RHD computations is the strict enforcement of intrinsic physical constraints: positivity of the rest-mass density and pressure, and the subluminal constraint on the fluid velocity (i.e., $|{\\bm v}|<1$ with the light speed $c=1$). \nThese constraints define the admissible state set of the system. \nNumerical violations (negative density/pressure or superluminal velocity) are not only nonphysical but may also cause immediate breakdown of the computation, particularly in extreme regimes characterized by large Lorentz factors, near-vacuum conditions, or strong shocks. \nIn practice, such failures are sometimes handled in an ad hoc manner by restarting with more diffusive schemes and/or smaller CFL numbers until admissibility is recovered \\cite{2006Zhang, hughes2002three}. \nThis lack of rigor and predictability motivates the development of high-order methods that guarantee admissibility by construction, commonly referred to as physical-constraints-preserving (PCP) or, more generally, invariant-domain-preserving (IDP) schemes.\n\n\n\n\nIn the broader setting of hyperbolic conservation laws, the design of provably PCP/IDP schemes has advanced substantially, with two major limiter paradigms emerging. \nThe first class consists of scaling-type limiters, pioneered by Zhang and Shu, and successfully applied to scalar conservation laws \\cite{zhang2010}, the nonrelativistic Euler equations \\cite{zhang2012positivity, zhang2010b}, and the compressible Navier--Stokes equations \\cite{ZHANG2017301}. \nThe second class enforces admissibility through flux correction, i.e., nonlinear blending of high-order and low-order numerical fluxes. \nRepresentative examples include parametrized maximum-principle/positivity-preserving flux limiters for scalar laws \\cite{Xu2014, Liang2014}, convection-dominated diffusion \\cite{jiang2013parametrized}, and the compressible Euler equations \\cite{Xiong2016}. \nIn addition, Hu, Adams, and Shu \\cite{Hu2013} proposed a sufficient positivity-preserving flux limiting condition for the Euler equations via a convex decomposition of cell averages, an approach later generalized to special RHD by Wu and Tang \\cite{WuTang2015}.\n\n\n\nThe flux-correction philosophy can be traced back to the Flux-Corrected Transport (FCT) method of Boris and Book \\cite{boris1973flux, book1975flux, boris1976flux}. \nZalesak extended FCT to fully multidimensional settings \\cite{zalesak1979fully} and developed a structured-grid limiter for scalar conservation laws \\cite{zalesak2012design}, laying foundations for later IDP/PCP developments. \nRecent work has further clarified the close connection between Zalesak-type FCT limiters and parametrized flux limiters; see, e.g., \\cite{Xu2014,wu2025high}. \nKuzmin and collaborators systematically extended FCT to multidimensional and high-order discretizations \\cite{kuzmin2001positive, kuzmin2004high} and proposed monolithic convex limiting techniques for hyperbolic systems \\cite{kuzmin2020monolithic}. \nOther notable FCT-type variants include the Point-Average-Moment PolynomiAl-Interpreted (PAMPA) schemes \\cite{abgrall2024bound, abgrall2025bound, abgrall2025novel}. \nAnother influential line is the convex limiting framework of Guermond, Popov, and Tomas \\cite{guermond2017invariant, guermond2018second, guermond2019invariant}, developed for discretization-independent IDP mechanisms and applied across continuous finite elements and other discretization frameworks. \nFor comprehensive discussions of FCT/IDP principles and algorithms, we refer to \\cite{kuzmin2012flux, wu2025high} and the references therein.\n\n\n\nApplying PCP/IDP ideas to RHD is nontrivial. \nAlthough the equations are conservative, neither the fluxes nor the wave speeds admit simple closed-form expressions purely in terms of conservative variables, since they depend on primitive variables obtained through a nonlinear recovery procedure; see Section~\\ref{sec: RHD}. \nDespite these difficulties, major progress has been achieved for special RHD. \nWu and Tang \\cite{WuTang2015} derived the first explicit equivalent characterization of the admissible state set, later generalized to general equations of state (EOS) \\cite{WuTang2017ApJS}, and developed high-order PCP finite-difference WENO schemes with flux-corrected limiters. \nThis foundation has supported extensions to unstructured finite-volume methods \\cite{chen2022physical}, discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods \\cite{QinShu2016, WuTang2017ApJS}, and invariant-region/minimum-entropy-principle approaches \\cite{WuMEP2021, cui2025local}. \nRelated PCP frameworks have also been established for general relativistic hydrodynamics \\cite{wu2017design} and coupled with the oscillation-eliminating approach \\cite{peng2025oedg} in \\cite{cao2025robust}, and PCP techniques have been extended to relativistic MHD \\cite{WuTangM3AS, WuShu2020NumMath} as well as nonrelativistic MHD \\cite{Wu2017a, WuShu2018, WuShu2019}. \nFor further background, we refer to the reviews \\cite{marti2003numerical, Marti2015}, the textbook \\cite{rezzolla2013relativistic}, and recent studies \\cite{WuShu2019SISC, marquina2019capturing, xu2024high}.\n\n\nMore recently, the geometric quasilinearization (GQL) framework was introduced in \\cite{wu2023geometric}, inspired by PCP analyses for (relativistic) MHD and related systems \\cite{WuTangM3AS, Wu2017a, WuShu2018, WuShu2019, WuShu2020NumMath}. \nGQL converts nonlinear admissibility constraints into equivalent families of linear inequalities parameterized by auxiliary variables, offering a geometric route to PCP design. \nHowever, for special RHD a key practical bottleneck remains: enforcing the nonlinear constraint $q({\\bf U})>0$ (encoding positive pressure and subluminal velocity) in a way that is both sharp and efficient. \nAchieving high resolution requires the flux-corrected limiting parameter $\\theta\\in[0,1]$ to stay as close to $1$ as possible, while guaranteeing admissibility at every interface and Runge--Kutta stage. \nEven within the GQL framework \\cite{wu2023geometric}, the limiting step naturally leads to a worst-case optimization over an auxiliary variable $v_{*}$; existing strategies often rely on discrete sampling or iterative root-finding, whose cost and implementation complexity grow rapidly in multiple space dimensions and may become overly restrictive when the solution approaches the boundary of the admissible set.\n\n\nTo address these issues, we propose a new, efficient PCP flux-limiting framework for special RHD that avoids iterative searches over auxiliary variables in the limiting step. \nBuilding on the GQL characterization and the classical Zalesak-type FCT mechanism, our main contributions are:\n\\begin{itemize}\n\t\\item \\textit{GQL--FCT scalar-style PCP limiting.} We integrate the GQL family of linear inequalities into an FCT update to construct a scalar-style limiter that acts directly on conservative variables. \n\tIn contrast to classical characteristic FCT limiters for hyperbolic systems \\cite{zalesak1979fully,zalesak2012design}, our GQL-based PCP limiter does \\emph{not} require characteristic decomposition in the limiting step. \n\tFurthermore, unlike the FCT approach using GQL with a specific convex decomposition for PAMPA schemes \\cite{abgrall2024bound}, the present limiter avoids such a prior convex decomposition; our limiting approach is thus applicable to other high-order numerical frameworks, such as finite difference and finite volume schemes.\n\t\n\t\\item \\textit{Eigenvalue-based parameter estimation.} We resolve the computational bottleneck associated with the nonlinear constraint. \n\tBy introducing a rational (stereographic-type) parameterization of the GQL normal vector, we transform the worst-case minimization over GQL auxiliary variables into a generalized Rayleigh-quotient maximization. \n\tConsequently, the limiter parameters are obtained from only a few small \\emph{symmetric eigenvalue problems} ($2\\times2$ in 1D; $(d{+}1)\\times(d{+}1)$ in $d$ dimensions), yielding an explicit, non-iterative procedure. \n\tFor 2D and 3D, we further propose relaxed variants that substantially reduce the number of eigenvalue evaluations while retaining robustness (from 16 to 6 in 2D and from 64 to 9 in 3D).\n\t\n\t\\item \\textit{High-order PCP WENO schemes and numerical validation.} We couple the new limiter with standard fifth-order finite-difference WENO reconstruction and strong-stability-preserving Runge--Kutta time integration. \n\tA series of demanding one- to three-dimensional benchmarks, including ultra-relativistic Riemann problems, multidimensional Riemann problems, shock--bubble interaction, and relativistic jet simulations, demonstrate robustness and high-order accuracy. \n\tComparisons with the classical Wu--Tang PCP limiter \\cite{WuTang2015} indicate that the new estimator provides better resolution.\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\nFrom the viewpoint of invariant-domain enforcement, convex limiting and its monolithic variants provide a general mechanism to restrict high-order (anti-diffusive) corrections so that the updated degrees of freedom remain in a prescribed convex admissible set; see, e.g., the convex limiting framework of Guermond et al.~\\cite{guermond2018second, guermond2019invariant} and the monolithic convex limiting approach of Kuzmin~\\cite{kuzmin2020monolithic}. \nIn contrast, we exploit the specific geometry of the special-RHD admissible set in conservative variables: besides $D>0$, the nonlinear constraint $q({\\bm U})=E-\\sqrt{D^2+|{\\bm m}|^2}>0$ is represented \\emph{exactly} as the intersection of linear half-space inequalities ${\\bf U}\\cdot{\\bm n}({\\bm v}_*)>0$ for all ${\\bm v}_*\\in \\mathbb{B}_1({\\bf 0})$. \nThis makes it possible to embed constraint enforcement into a scalar-style Zalesak-type FCT update by applying lower-bound limiting to the projected quantities ${\\bf U}\\cdot{\\bm n}({\\bm v}_*)$, acting directly on conservative variables and avoiding any problem-specific convex decomposition of states in the limiting step.\n\n \n\nThe remainder of this paper is organized as follows. \nSection~\\ref{sec: RHD} introduces the governing equations and the GQL characterization of the admissible state set. \nSection~\\ref{Sec: FD Review} outlines the base finite-difference WENO discretization. \nSection~\\ref{Sec: BP analysis} details the construction of the GQL--FCT PCP flux limiter, the eigenvalue-based parameter estimation, and the proof of the PCP property. \nNumerical validations are presented in Section~\\ref{Sec: Results}, followed by conclusions in Section~\\ref{sec:conclusion}.\n\n% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\\section{Relativistic Euler system and admissible state set} \\label{sec: RHD}\nThe $d$-dimensional special relativistic hydrodynamics system can be formulated as a system of hyperbolic conservation laws:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:RHD3D}\n\t\\frac{\\partial {\\bf U}}{\\partial t} + \\sum_{i=1}^{d} \\frac{\\partial {\\bf F}_i({\\bf U})}{\\partial x_i} = {\\bf 0},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere the conservative vector ${\\bf U}$ and flux function ${\\bf F}_i$ are defined as\n\\begin{align} \n\t&{\\bf U} = \n\t\\left( D, {\\bm m}^\\top, E \\right)^\\top \n\t= \n\t\\left( \\rho \\gamma, \\rho h \\gamma^2 {\\bm v}^\\top, \\rho h \\gamma^2 - p \\right)^\\top, \n\t\\label{eq:86} \\\\ \n\t&{\\bf F}_i = \n\t\\left( D v_i, v_i {\\bm m}^\\top + p {\\bm e}_i^\\top, m_i \\right)^\\top \n\t= \n\t\\left( \\rho \\gamma v_i, \\rho h \\gamma^2 v_i {\\bm v}^\\top + p {\\bm e}_i^\\top, \\rho h \\gamma^2 v_i \\right)^\\top.\n\t\\label{eq:93} \n\\end{align}\nHere, $D,\\ {\\bm m}$, and $E$ correspond to the mass density, momentum density vector, and energy density, respectively, and are collectively referred to as {\\em conservative variables}. The rest-mass density $\\rho$, fluid velocity ${\\bm v} = (v_1, v_2, \\dots, v_d)^\\top$, and pressure $p$ are often termed {\\em primitive variables}. The Lorentz factor \n$\\gamma = (1 - |{\\bm v}|^2)^{-\\frac12},$ with ${|\\bm v|}$ denoting the magnitude of the velocity vector, and ${\\bm e}_i$ stands for the $i$-th column of the $d \\times d$ identity matrix.\n\nThe RHD system \\eqref{eq:RHD3D} is closed by an EOS, which relates the specific enthalpy $h$ to pressure $p$ and rest-mass density $\\rho$. To ensure relativistic causality (local sound speed $c_s<1$), the EOS must satisfy the inequality \\cite{WuTang2017ApJS}:\n\\begin{equation*}\n h\\ \\left(\\frac{1}{\\rho} - \\frac{\\partial h}{\\partial p}(p,\\rho)\\right) < \\frac{\\partial h}{\\partial \\rho}(p,\\rho) < 0.\n\\end{equation*}\nIn this work, we adopt the ideal EOS:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{ID-EOS}\n h = 1 + \\frac{\\Gamma p}{(\\Gamma -1) \\rho} ,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\Gamma \\in (1,2]$ is the adiabatic index. \nThe admissible state set of the RHD system \\eqref{eq:RHD3D} with the ideal EOS \\eqref{ID-EOS} is defined as:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:3constraints}\n \\mathcal{G} = \\left\\{ {\\bf U} = (D, {\\bm m}^\\top, E)^\\top \\in \\mathbb{R}^{d+2} \\mid \\rho({\\bf U}) > 0,\\ p({\\bf U}) > 0,\\ {\\bm v}({\\bf U}) \\in \\mathbb{B}_1({\\bf 0})\\subseteq\\mathbb{R}^d\\right\\},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mathbb{B}_1({\\bf 0})$ denotes the $d$-dimensional unit ball centered at the origin. An explicit equivalent characterization of $\\mathcal{G}$ was derived in \\cite{WuTang2015}:\n\\begin{equation} \\label{1stequivG}\n \\mathcal{G}^{(1)} = \\left\\{ {\\bf U} = (D, {\\bm m}^\\top, E)^\\top \\in \\mathbb{R}^{d+2} \\mid D > 0,\\ q({\\bf U}) := E - \\sqrt{D^2 + |{\\bm m}|^2} > 0 \\right\\},\n\\end{equation}\nwhich was further linearized via the GQL framework \\cite{wu2023geometric} as:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:1218}\n \\mathcal{G}^{(2)}= \\left\\{ {\\bf U} = (D,{\\bm m}^\\top,E)^\\top \\in \\mathbb{R}^{d+2} \\mid D > 0,\\ {\\bf U}\\cdot {\\bm n}_* > 0,\\ \\forall {\\bm v_*} \\in \\mathbb{B}_1({\\bf 0}) \\right\\},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere ${\\bm n}_*:= \\big( -\\sqrt{1-|{\\bm v}_*|^2}, -{\\bm v}_*^\\top, 1 \\big)^\\top$, and ${\\bm v}_*$ is the auxiliary parameter introduced in the GQL framework to linearize the constraints. As demonstrated in Section \\ref{Sec: BP analysis}, this linear representation $\\mathcal{G}^{(2)}$ offers substantial advantages over the original nonlinear form of $\\mathcal{G}$ in PCP analysis for RHD.\n\nDifferent from the nonrelativistic case, there are no explicit expressions for either the fluxes ${\\bf F}_i$\nor the primitive quantities in terms of the conservative variables ${\\bf U}$ for RHD. In the computation, we have to first recover the primitive variables from the conservative ones before evaluating the fluxes. For a given conservative vector $\\bm U=(D,\\bm m,E)^\\top\\in\\mathcal G$, we recover primitive variables $(\\rho,\\bm v,p)^\\top$ for the ideal EOS \\eqref{ID-EOS} by solving a nonlinear algebraic equation \\cite{WuTang2015}\n\\begin{equation} \\label{RHDCon2Pri}\n\\Phi_{\\bf U}(p) := \\frac{p}{\\Gamma-1}-E+\\frac{\\|{\\bm m}\\|^2}{E+p}+D\\sqrt{1-\\frac{\\|{\\bm m}\\|^2}{(E+p)^2}} = 0 \\quad \\text{for}\\ \\ p>0.\n\\end{equation}\nOnce $p$ is determined from \\eqref{RHDCon2Pri}, the velocity vector ${\\bm v}$ and rest-mass density $\\rho$ are computed via:\n\\[\n\\bm v=\\frac{\\bm m}{E+p},\\qquad \\rho=D\\sqrt{1-\\|{\\bm v}\\|^2}.\n\\]\nTo solve \\eqref{RHDCon2Pri} robustly, we suggest the provably convergent iterative algorithms for RHD primitive-variable recovery in \\cite{chen2022physical, cai2024provably}.\n\n\n% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\\section{Review of finite difference WENO methods} \\label{Sec: FD Review}\n\\setcounter{equation}{0}\nThe proposed GQL-based limiting framework is applicable to general high-order finite-difference and finite-volume schemes. {Since WENO methods are particularly popular, our numerical experiments use a high-order finite-difference classical WENO-JS scheme \\cite{jiang1996efficient} with $\\epsilon = 10^{-6}$ as a representative example to demonstrate the effectiveness of the framework; however, the same framework can be applied directly to other high-order discretizations as well, such as WENO-Z \\cite{borges2008improved} and monotonicity-preserving \\cite{suresh1997accurate} schemes.}\nFor completeness, we briefly recall the standard finite-difference WENO discretization for one-dimensional systems of conservation laws.\nConsider the $d=1$ case of \\eqref{eq:RHD3D},\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:RHD1D}\n {\\bf U}_t + {\\bf F}({\\bf U})_x = {\\bf 0},\n\\end{equation}\non a uniform grid $x_i=i\\Delta x$.\nA conservative flux-differencing semi-discretization takes the form\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:semiWENO}\n \\frac{d{\\bf U}_i}{dt} = -\\frac{1}{\\Delta x}\\Bigl(\\widehat{\\bf F}_{i+1/2}-\\widehat{\\bf F}_{i-1/2}\\Bigr),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\widehat{\\bf F}_{i+1/2}$ is a high-order accurate numerical flux at the interface $x_{i+1/2}=(x_i+x_{i+1})/2$.\n\n\\paragraph{Global Lax--Friedrichs flux splitting}\nWe employ the global Lax--Friedrichs (LF) splitting\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:LFsplit}\n {\\bf F}^{\\pm}({\\bf U})=\\frac12\\Bigl({\\bf F}({\\bf U}) \\pm \\alpha{\\bf U} \\Bigr),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\alpha$ is the globally defined maximum wave speed, that is, the spectral radius of the Jacobian ${\\bf A}({\\bf U})=\\partial{\\bf F}/\\partial{\\bf U}$ over all grid points, i.e.,\n$\\alpha = \\max_j \\rho\\bigl({\\bf A}({\\bf U}_j)\\bigr)$.\nThen ${\\bf F}({\\bf U})={\\bf F}^{+}({\\bf U})+{\\bf F}^{-}({\\bf U})$, and the positive/negative parts can be reconstructed using upwind-biased stencils.\n\n\\paragraph{Characteristic projection and WENO5 reconstruction}\nLet ${\\bf L}_{i+1/2}$ and ${\\bf R}_{i+1/2}={\\bf L}_{i+1/2}^{-1}$ be the left/right eigenvector matrices of ${\\bf A}({\\bf U})$ evaluated at a suitable interface state (e.g., a local average of $\\{{\\bf U}_j\\}$).\nDefine the characteristic split fluxes\n\\[\n {\\bf W}_{j}^{\\pm} := {\\bf L}_{i+1/2}\\,{\\bf F}^{\\pm}({\\bf U}_j).\n\\]\nFor each component of ${\\bf W}_j^{+}$, apply the standard fifth-order WENO reconstruction \\cite{liu1994weighted,jiang1996efficient} with a \\emph{left-biased} stencil to obtain the interface value $\\widehat{\\bf W}^{+}_{i+1/2}$.\nSimilarly, reconstruct ${\\bf W}_j^{-}$ with a \\emph{right-biased} stencil to obtain $\\widehat{\\bf W}^{-}_{i+1/2}$.\nTransform back to physical space,\n\\[\n \\widehat{\\bf F}^{\\pm}_{i+1/2} := {\\bf R}_{i+1/2}\\,\\widehat{\\bf W}^{\\pm}_{i+1/2},\n\\qquad\n \\widehat{\\bf F}_{i+1/2} := \\widehat{\\bf F}^{+}_{i+1/2}+\\widehat{\\bf F}^{-}_{i+1/2}.\n\\]\nIn multiple spatial dimensions, the above procedure is applied dimension-by-dimension to each directional flux.\n\n\\paragraph{Time integration}\nThe semi-discrete system \\eqref{eq:semiWENO} is advanced in time by the third-order SSP Runge--Kutta method.\nThe PCP flux limiting procedure developed in Section~\\ref{Sec: BP analysis} is applied at each Runge--Kutta stage.\n\n% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\\section{A novel PCP flux limiter} \\label{Sec: BP analysis}\n\\setcounter{equation}{0}\n\nIn this section, we will discuss the PCP high-order schemes for one-, two-, and three-dimensional RHD with the ideal EOS \\eqref{ID-EOS}. The PCP property is achieved through our novel flux limiter, which is motivated by Zalesak's limiter in Flux-Corrected Transport (FCT) schemes for scalar partial differential equations \\cite{zalesak1979fully,zalesak2012design,kuzmin2012flux}.\n\n%Applying the FCT scheme with Zalesak's FCT limiter to nonlinear hyperbolic systems relies on (i) if for spurious oscillation suppression a local characteristic projection to decouple complex multi-wave interactions into independent scalar problems, thereby transplanting the well-established high-resolution limiting techniques from the scalar case \\cite{zalesak2012design} (ii) if for invariant domain preservation, requires a specific convex decomposition to derive a sufficient PCP condition. However, this classical strategy also comes with stricter high computational costs, especially in the multi-dimensional case. \nRecently, Wu and Shu proposed the Geometric Quasi Linearization (GQL) framework for PCP analysis, providing new insights into dealing with nonlinear hyperbolic systems, such as RHD \\eqref{eq:RHD3D}. The GQL theory reformulates the nonlinear constraints into equivalent linear ones by introducing additional free parameters. As observed and verified in \\eqref{eq:1218}, we can judge whether the solution lies in $\\mathcal{G}$ by the sign of the {\\em scalar} ${\\bf U} \\cdot {\\bm n}_*$, which can be integrated with Zalesak's limiter in scalar equations for RHD, without transforming the system into its local characteristic space or seeking a technical convex decomposition for a sufficient PCP condition.\n\n\\subsection{One-dimensional case}\nWe consider the following finite difference FCT scheme for the case $d = 1$ in \\eqref{eq:RHD3D}. \n{In what follows, we denote:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+1/2}^L$: first-order low-order numerical flux (see \\eqref{eq:LF_loworder} for the detailed definition).\n \\item $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+1/2}^H$: fifth-order characteristic WENO flux described in Section~\\ref{Sec: FD Review}.\n \\item $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+1/2}^A := \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+1/2}^H - \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+1/2}^L$: anti-diffusive numerical flux.\n\\end{itemize}}\nFor convenience, we omit the subscript of $x_1$:\n\\begin{equation} \\label{uLF1DRHD}\n {\\bf U}_i^L := {\\bf U}_i^n - \\frac{\\Delta t}{\\Delta x}\\left(\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+{1}/{2}}^L-\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i-{1}/{2}}^L\\right),\n\\end{equation}\n\\begin{equation} \\label{uPCP1D}\n {\\bf U}_i^{n+1} = {\\bf U}_i^L - \\frac{\\Delta t}{\\Delta x}\\left(\\theta_{i+{1}/{2}}\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+{1}/{2}}^A-\\theta_{i-{1}/{2}}\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i-{1}/{2}}^A\\right).\n\\end{equation}\nIn our implementation, the low-order flux is chosen as the first-order global LF (Rusanov) flux\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:LF_loworder}\n \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+{1}/{2}}^L=\\frac12\\Bigl({\\bf F}({\\bf U}_i^n)+{\\bf F}({\\bf U}_{i+1}^n)-\\alpha\\,({\\bf U}_{i+1}^n-{\\bf U}_i^n)\\Bigr)\n\\end{equation}\nwith the same LF parameter $\\alpha$ as in \\eqref{eq:LFsplit}. (At each SSP-RK stage, ${\\bf U}^n$ is replaced by the corresponding stage solution.) The LF scheme \\eqref{uLF1DRHD} with flux \\eqref{eq:LF_loworder} is known to preserve the admissible set for the RHD system under a suitable CFL condition; see, e.g., \\cite{WuTang2015,Wu2017a}. Our goal is to find the explicit formula for the coefficients $\\theta_{i+{1}/{2}}$. \n% For convenience, we denote\n% \\[\n% {\\bf U}_i^L = \\left(D_i^L,\\ m_i^L,\\ E_i^L\\right)^\\top,\\qquad\n% \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm 1/2}^A = \\left(\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm 1/2}^{A,D},\\ \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm 1/2}^{A,m},\\ \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm 1/2}^{A,E}\\right)^\\top.\n% \\]\n\nAt each SSP-RK stage, we enforce the following $\\epsilon$-admissible set in conservative variables:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:1219}\n \\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon^{(1)}=\\left\\{{\\bf U}\\in\\mathbb{R}^3 \\ \\big|\\ D({\\bf U})\\geq\\epsilon,\\ q({\\bf U})=E-\\sqrt{D^2+m^2}\\geq\\epsilon\\right\\}.\n\\end{equation}\nWe fix a small parameter $\\epsilon>0$ such that ${\\bf U}_i^L\\in \\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon^{(1)}$ for all $i$.\nIn computation, we choose it stage-by-stage as\n$\\epsilon=\\min\\bigl\\{10^{-13},\\ D_i^L\\bigr\\}$ or $\\epsilon=\\min\\bigl\\{10^{-13},\\ q({\\bf U}_i^L)\\bigr\\}$ for each cell within the computational domain.\n{\nThe $q$-constraint in \\eqref{eq:1219} is nonlinear with respect to ${\\bf U}$, which makes it difficult for the PCP analysis. We first find an equivalent linear form following the GQL framework \\cite{WuTang2015,wu2023geometric}.\n\\begin{proposition}[Equivalent GQL representation of $\\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon^{(1)}$]\\label{prop:GQL form}\n The $\\epsilon$-admissible set \\eqref{eq:1219} can be equivalently written as an intersection of half-spaces:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{1DRHDGQLeps}\n \\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon^{(2)}=\\left\\{{\\bf U}\\in\\mathbb{R}^3 \\ \\big|\\ D({\\bf U})\\geq\\epsilon,\\ {\\bf U}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*(v_*)\\geq \\epsilon,\\ \n {\\bm n}_*(v_*):=\\left(-\\sqrt{1-{ v}_*^2},\\ -{v}_*,\\ 1\\right)^\\top,\\ \\forall\\ { v}_*\\in (-1,1)\\right\\}.\n\\end{equation}\n\\end{proposition}\n\\begin{proof}\n\tLet $\\phi({\\bf U}, v_*):= {\\bf U}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*(v_*)-\\epsilon = E-mv_*-D\\sqrt{1-v_*^2}-\\epsilon$. By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we obtain\n \\[\n \\phi({\\bf U}, v_*) \\geq E - \\sqrt{D^2+m^2}\\sqrt{v_*^2+\\left(\\sqrt{1-v_*^2}\\right)^2} = q({\\bf U})-\\epsilon.\n \\]\n Since the equality holds when $v_* = \\frac{m}{\\sqrt{D^2+m^2}}\\in(-1,1)$, we have $\\min\\limits_{v_*\\in(-1,1)}\\phi({\\bf U},v_*)=q({\\bf U})-\\epsilon$. This completes the proof.\n\\end{proof}\n}\n% Following the GQL framework \\cite{WuTang2015,wu2023geometric}, \\eqref{eq:1219} is equivalently written as an intersection of half-spaces:\n% \\begin{equation}\\label{1DRHDGQLeps}\n% \\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon^{(2)}=\\left\\{{\\bf U}\\in\\mathbb{R}^3 \\ \\big|\\ D({\\bf U})\\geq\\epsilon,\\ {\\bf U}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*(v_*)\\geq \\epsilon,\\ \n% {\\bm n}_*(v_*):=\\left(-\\sqrt{1-{ v}_*^2},\\ -{v}_*,\\ 1\\right)^\\top,\\ \\forall\\ { v}_*\\in (-1,1)\\right\\}.\n% \\end{equation}\nFor the exact GQL characterization with zero lower bound, normalization of the normal vector is immaterial because the half-space inequality is homogeneous under positive rescaling. \n% In the $\\epsilon$-admissible formulation used below, because \n{\nProposition~\\ref{prop:GQL form} states that, for the same $\\epsilon$, $q({\\bf U}) \\ge \\epsilon$ is exactly equivalent to ${\\bf U}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*(v_*)\\geq \\epsilon$ for all ${ v}_*\\in (-1,1)$ with the specific unnormalized normal ${\\bm n}_*(v_*)$ in \\eqref{1DRHDGQLeps}, we thus do not rescale it; consequently the same lower bound $\\epsilon$ is used consistently in all projected inequalities. \nIf one chooses to normalize ${\\bm n}_*(v_*)$ to unit Euclidean length $(\\widehat{\\bm n}_* = {\\bm n}_* / \\sqrt{2})$, the equivalent constraint becomes ${\\bf U}\\cdot\\widehat{\\bm n}_*\\geq\\epsilon/\\sqrt{2}$. The equivalence is preserved only if the constraint parameter is scaled by the reciprocal of the norm. Our choice of the unnormalized normal vector is purely for notational convenience, as it avoids the introduction of arbitrary scaling factors in the subsequent flux limiter derivation. This normalization property holds generally for the GQL framework in all spatial dimensions.\n} Therefore, it suffices to apply the scalar lower-bound operation in Zalesak's FCT limiter to the two linear constraints associated with ${\\bm n}_D:=(1,0,0)^\\top$ and ${\\bm n}_*(v_*)$ in \\eqref{1DRHDGQLeps}. To make the description convenient and clear, we follow Zalesak's notation \\cite{zalesak2012design} and redefine the related quantities for any fixed vector ${\\bm n}$.\n\\begin{align*}\n P^{-}_{i} &= \\min\\left(0, -\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^{A}_{i+{1}/{2}}\\cdot{\\bm n}\\right) + \\min\\left(0, \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^{A}_{i-{1}/{2}}\\cdot{\\bm n}\\right).\\\\\n Q^{-}_{i} &= \\frac{\\Delta x}{\\Delta t}\\left(\\epsilon - {\\bf U}^{L}_{i}\\cdot{\\bm n}\\right),\\quad {\\bf U}^{L}_{i}\\ \\text{is defined in }\\eqref{uLF1DRHD}.\\\\\n R^{-}_{i} &= \n \\begin{cases}\n \\min\\left(1, \\frac{Q^{-}_{i}}{P^{-}_{i}}\\right), & \\text{if}\\quad P^{-}_{i} < 0,\\\\\n 1,& \\text{otherwise}.\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{align*}\n\n{\\bf Step 1:} Enforce $D({\\bf U})\\geq\\epsilon$.\nThis step is identical to the scalar FCT lower-bound limiting. We take ${\\bm n} = {\\bm n}_D$ (so that ${\\bf U}\\cdot{\\bm n}_D=D({\\bf U})$) and use the parameter $\\epsilon=\\min\\bigl\\{10^{-13},\\ D_i^L\\bigr\\}$. The coefficients of the density flux limiter are computed by\n\\begin{equation} \\label{alphaD1D}\n \\theta_{i+\\frac{1}{2}}^D = \n \\begin{cases}\n R_{i}^- & \\text{if}\\quad \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+{1}/{2}}^{A}\\cdot{\\bm n}_D \\geq 0, \\\\\n R_{i+1}^- & \\text{if}\\quad \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+{1}/{2}}^{A}\\cdot{\\bm n}_D < 0.\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nThe density flux limiter $\\theta_{i+{1}/{2}}^D$ can be exactly computed in each interface because $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+{1}/{2}}^{A,D}$, representing the first component of the anti-diffusive numerical flux in the $x$ direction, is a scalar.\n\n{\\bf Step 2:} Enforce ${\\bf U}\\cdot{\\bm n_*}\\geq \\epsilon\\iff q({\\bf U})=E-\\sqrt{D^2+m^2}\\geq\\epsilon$.\nSimilar to {Step 1}, we obtain the formulations of the flux limiter for $q({\\bf U})$\n\\begin{equation} \\label{1DRHDPressure}\n \\theta_{i+\\frac{1}{2}}^q = \n \\begin{cases}\n R_{i}^- & \\text{if}\\quad \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+{1}/{2}}^{A}\\cdot{\\bm n}_* \\geq 0, \\\\\n R_{i+1}^- & \\text{if}\\quad \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+{1}/{2}}^{A}\\cdot{\\bm n}_* < 0.\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nIn this step, ${\\bm n} = {\\bm n}_*(v_*)=\\left(-\\sqrt{1-{ v}_*^2},\\ -{v}_*,\\ 1\\right)^\\top$ with ${v}_*\\in (-1,1)$, and $\\epsilon=\\min\\bigl\\{10^{-13},\\ q({\\bf U}_i^L)\\bigr\\}$ is used. The main difference from Step~1 is the presence of the free parameter ${v}_*$. Since $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+{1}/{2}}^{A}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*$ in Step~2 depends on ${v}_*$, its sign cannot be determined once and for all at a fixed interface; hence the sign-based coefficient in \\eqref{1DRHDPressure} cannot be used directly as a uniform limiter for all GQL half-spaces. We therefore solve the following worst-case optimization problem\n\\begin{align}\n (P_1): \\mathcal{L}_{i} &= \\min\\limits_{{v}_*\\in (-1,1)}\\frac{\\frac{\\Delta x}{\\Delta t}\\left({\\epsilon} - {\\bf U}^{L}_{i}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*\\right)}{\\min\\left(0, -\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^{A}_{i+{1}/{2}}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*\\right) + \\min\\left(0, \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^{A}_{i-{1}/{2}}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*\\right)} \\nonumber \\\\\n &= \\min\\limits_{{v}_*\\in (-1,1)}\\frac{\\frac{\\Delta x}{\\Delta t}\\left({\\bf U}^{L}_{i}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*-{\\epsilon}\\right)}{\\max\\left(0, \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^{A}_{i+{1}/{2}}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*\\right) + \\max\\left(0, -\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^{A}_{i-{1}/{2}}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*\\right)} \\nonumber \\\\\n &= \\frac{\\Delta x}{\\Delta t}\\left(\\max\\limits_{{ v}_*\\in (-1,1)}\n \\frac{\\max\\left(0, \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^{A}_{i+{1}/{2}}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*\\right) + \n \\max\\left(0, -\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^{A}_{i-{1}/{2}}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*\\right)}\n {{\\bf U}^{L}_{i}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*-{\\epsilon}}\\right)^{-1}. \\tag{P1}\\label{1DbeforeQuadForm}\n\\end{align}\nAs in the scalar FCT coefficient \\(R_i^-\\), the actual cell-wise coefficient is capped at one. Equivalently, if \\(M_i\\) denotes the denominator maximum in the last line of \\eqref{1DbeforeQuadForm}, then \\(\\mathcal{L}_i=1\\) when \\(M_i=0\\), and otherwise\n\\[\n\\mathcal{L}_i=\\min\\left\\{1,\\frac{\\Delta x}{\\Delta t\\,M_i}\\right\\}.\n\\]\nThe uncapped denominator ratio is introduced below only for deriving the quadratic maximization.\n\\begin{equation} \\label{1Doptfun}\n\\mathcal{L}_i({\\bm n}_*) := \\frac{\\max\\left(0, \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^{A}_{i+{1}/{2}}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*\\right) + \n \\max\\left(0, -\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^{A}_{i-{1}/{2}}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*\\right)}\n {{\\bf U}^{L}_{i}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*-{\\epsilon}}.\n\\end{equation}\n\n\\begin{table}[!tb] \n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.8}\n \\centering\n \\belowrulesep=0pt\n \\aboverulesep=0pt\n \\caption{Formulae for coefficients in \\eqref{1DUFcdotn}.}\n \\label{tab:1DQuadCoeff}\n % \\scalebox{0.99}{\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3mm}{\n \\begin{tabular}{c|c|c}\n \\toprule[1.5pt]\n {} &\n {$(a,b,c)^\\top$} &\n {$(d^{\\pm},e^{\\pm},f^{\\pm})^\\top$} \\\\ \n \\midrule[1.5pt]\n {$|{u}_*|<1$} & ${\\bf M}{\\bf U}_i^L-{\\bf S}$ & ${\\bf M}\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^{A}_{i\\pm1/2}$ \\\\\n % {$|{u}_*|>1$} & ${\\bf M}^{>1}{\\bf U}_i^L-{\\bf S}$ & ${\\bf M}^{>1}\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^{A}_{i\\pm1/2}$ \\\\\n \\bottomrule[1.5pt]\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n % }\n\\end{table}\n\n{Since the normal vector ${\\bm n}_*(v_*)$ contains the irrational term $\\sqrt{1-|v_{*}|^{2}}$, the minimization problem \\eqref{1DbeforeQuadForm} is algebraically cumbersome to handle directly.} To rigorously transform this into a quadratic form, we introduce a stereographic-type rational parameterization of the unit interval. Let $u_*$ be an auxiliary variable; we define the mapping:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{1Dvstar_para} \n\tv_{*} := \\frac{2u_{*}}{1+u_{*}^{2}} {~~\\mbox{ with } u_* \\in (-1,1) \\quad \\implies \\quad {\\bm n}_*(u_*) = \\left(-\\frac{1-u_{*}^{2}}{1+u_{*}^{2}}, -\\frac{2u_{*}}{1+u_{*}^{2}}, 1\\right)^\\top.}\n\\end{equation}\n{For the open admissible range, the restriction $|u_*|<1$ is in one-to-one correspondence for $v_*\\in(-1,1)$, with inverse $u_*={v_*}/(1+\\sqrt{1-v_*^2})$.}\n{ To simplify the notation and make our presentation clearer, we introduce the following matrix and vector:\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\mathbf{M} = \\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 1 \\\\ 0 & 2 & 0 \\\\ -1 & 0 & 1 \\end{pmatrix}, \\quad \n \\mathbf{S} = \\begin{pmatrix} \\epsilon \\\\ 0 \\\\ \\epsilon \\end{pmatrix}.\n\\end{equation*}\nThen we obtain\n{\n\\begin{equation}\n {\\bf U}_{i}^L\\cdot{\\bm n}_*-\\epsilon:=\\frac{au_{*}^2-bu_{*}+c}{1+u_{*}^2}, \\qquad\n \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm{1}/{2}}^A\\cdot{\\bm n}_*:=\\frac{d^{\\pm}u_{*}^2-e^{\\pm}u_{*}+f^{\\pm}}{1+u_{*}^2}, \\label{1DUFcdotn}\n\\end{equation}}\nwhere the definitions of the quantities $a$, $b$, $c$, $d^{\\pm}$, $e^{\\pm}$, and $f^{\\pm}$ are listed in Table \\ref{tab:1DQuadCoeff}.}\n\n{Using \\eqref{1DUFcdotn},} we can solve $(P_1)$ by explicitly expressing the optimization function ${\\mathcal{L}}_{i}({\\bm n}_*)$ as the quadratic form with an extra constraint $|{ u}_*|<1$. \n{We first introduce some matrix notations, transforming \\eqref{1Doptfun} into the matrix-vector formulation. Let $\\star \\in \\{+,-\\}$ and define the sign function \n\\begin{equation*}\n \\tt{sign}(\\star) :=\n \\begin{cases}\n 1 & \\text{if}\\ \\star = +,\\\\\n -1 & \\text{if}\\ \\star = -.\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{equation*}\nThen we define\n\\begin{equation*}\n A^{\\star}:= {\\tt sign}(\\star)\n \\begin{pmatrix}\n d^{\\star} & -\\frac{e^{\\star}}{2} \\\\\n -\\frac{e^{\\star}}{2} & f^{\\star}\n \\end{pmatrix},\\qquad\n B:=\n \\begin{pmatrix}\n a & -\\frac{b}{2} \\\\\n -\\frac{b}{2} & c\n \\end{pmatrix},\\qquad\n {\\bm w}:=\n \\begin{pmatrix}\n u_* \\\\ 1\n \\end{pmatrix}.\n\\end{equation*}\n{\nSince ${\\bm w}^\\top B{\\bm w}={\\bf U}^{L}_{i}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*-\\epsilon\\geq 0$, the matrix $B$ is symmetrically positive definite except for the case ${b}^2=4ac\\iff q({\\bf U}_{i}^L)=\\epsilon$. \n% If ${b}^2=4ac$ (equivalently $q({\\bf U}_i^L)=\\epsilon$), then ${\\bf U}_i^L$ lies on the boundary of the relaxed admissible set and the matrix $B$ becomes singular.\nIn this borderline case,} any anti-diffusive correction may immediately violate $q({\\bf U})\\ge\\epsilon$, and we simply take $\\mathcal{L}_{i}=0$ (i.e., keep the low-order update). Otherwise, we rewrite \n\\begin{equation*}\n B = R^\\top R,\\qquad\n R = \n \\begin{pmatrix}\n \\sqrt{a} & -\\frac{b}{2\\sqrt{a}} \\\\\n 0 & \\sqrt{c-\\frac{{b}^2}{4a}}\n \\end{pmatrix}.\n\\end{equation*}\nWe can then derive the explicit formulae for matrices $\\widehat{A}^{\\star}:=R^{-\\top}A^{\\star}R^{-1}$:\n\\begin{equation} \\label{Astar}\n \\widehat{A}^{\\star} = {\\tt sign}(\\star)\n \\begin{pmatrix}\n \\frac{d^{\\star}}{a} & \\frac{bd^{\\star}-ae^{\\star}}{a\\sqrt{4ac-{b}^2}} \\\\\n \\frac{bd^{\\star}-ae^{\\star}}{a\\sqrt{4ac-{b}^2}} & \n \\frac{4a^2f^{\\star}-2a{b}{e^{\\star}}+d^{\\star}{b}^2}{a\\left(4ac-{b}^2\\right)}\n \\end{pmatrix}.\n\\end{equation}\nBased on the above matrix-vector notations, we continue to solve $(P_1)$. }\n\n\\begin{align*}\n {\\mathcal{L}}_{i}&=\\frac{\\Delta x}{\\Delta t}\\left(\\max\\limits_{{\\bm w}:=({u}_*,1)^\\top\\in\\mathbb{R}^2 \\atop {|{ u}_{*}|<1}}\n \\frac{\\max\\left(0,{\\bm w}^\\top A^+{\\bm w}\\right)+\\max\\left(0,{\\bm w}^\\top A^-{\\bm w}\\right)}{{\\bm w}^\\top B{\\bm w}}\\right)^{-1}\\\\\n % &=\\max\\limits_{{\\bm w}:=({u}_*,1)^\\top\\in\\mathbb{R}^2 \\atop {|{ u}_{*}|<1}}\n % \\frac{\\max\\left(0,{\\bm w}^\\top A^+{\\bm w}\\right)+\\max\\left(0,{\\bm w}^\\top A^-{\\bm w}\\right)}{(R{\\bm w})^\\top (R{\\bm w})}\\\\\n &=\\frac{\\Delta x}{\\Delta t}\\left(\\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}:=R{\\bm w}\\ \\in\\ \\mathbb{R}^2 \\atop {|{ u}_{*}|<1}}\n \\frac{\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}^+{\\bm z}\\right)+\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}^-{\\bm z}\\right)}\n {{\\bm z}^\\top {\\bm z}}\\right)^{-1}\\\\\n &=\\frac{\\Delta x}{\\Delta t}\\left(\\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}\\in\\mathbb{R}^2,\\ \\Vert {\\bm z} \\Vert_2=1 \\atop {|{ u}_{*}|<1}}\n \\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}^+{\\bm z}\\right)+\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}^-{\\bm z}\\right)\\right)^{-1}.\n\\end{align*}\nThe solution to the Rayleigh quotient $\\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}\\in\\mathbb{R}^2,\\ \\Vert {\\bm z} \\Vert_2=1}{\\bm z}^\\top\\widehat{A}^{\\star}{\\bm z}$ is the maximal eigenvalue of the matrix $\\widehat{A}^{\\star}$. However, this is not a standard Rayleigh quotient, and there are two main differences. On the one hand, we need an extra check for the feasibility of the associated optimizer ${\\bm w}=({u}_*,1)^\\top$, i.e., $|{u}_{*}|<1$ or not. On the other hand, for the case $d = 1$ in \\eqref{eq:RHD3D}, the optimization function \\eqref{1Doptfun} is a sum of two quotients composed of the maximum operation, which is clearly different. We adopt the following lemma to simplify the maximum operation. \n{\\begin{lemma}\\label{lem:RayleighQ}\nLet $p_1,\\dots,p_K\\in\\mathbb{R}$, and ${\\bm s} = (s_1, s_2, \\dots, s_K)^\\top \\in \\{0,1\\}^K$, where $s_k$ is the k-th element of the binary vector ${\\bm s}$. Then\n\\[\n\\sum_{k=1}^K \\max(0,p_k)\n= \\max_{S\\subseteq\\{1,\\dots,K\\}} \\sum_{k\\in S} p_k\n= \\max_{\\bm s\\in\\{0,1\\}^K} \\sum_{k=1}^K s_k p_k.\n\\]\n\\end{lemma}}\n\\begin{proof}\nLet $S_+:=\\{k\\in\\{1,\\dots,K\\}\\,:\\,p_k>0\\}$. Then $\\sum_{k=1}^K\\max(0,p_k)=\\sum_{k\\in S_+}p_k$.\nFor any subset $S$, we have $\\sum_{k\\in S}p_k\\le \\sum_{k\\in S_+}p_k$, because adding any index with $p_k\\le 0$ cannot increase the sum.\nTherefore the maximum is attained by $S=S_+$, which proves the identities.\n\\end{proof}\nWe can apply Lemma \\ref{lem:RayleighQ} to the Rayleigh quotient to solve ${\\mathcal{L}}_{i}$ immediately by taking $K=2$.\n{\\begin{equation*}\n {\\mathcal{L}}_{i}\n =\\frac{\\Delta x}{\\Delta t}\\left(\n \\max\\left\\{0,\\\n \\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}\\in\\mathbb{R}^2,\\ \\Vert {\\bm z} \\Vert_2=1 \\atop {|{ u}_{*}|<1}}{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}^+{\\bm z},\\ \\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}\\in\\mathbb{R}^2,\\ \\Vert {\\bm z} \\Vert_2=1 \\atop {|{ u}_{*}|<1}}{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}^-{\\bm z},\\ \n \\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}\\in\\mathbb{R}^2,\\ \\Vert {\\bm z} \\Vert_2=1 \\atop {|{ u}_{*}|<1}}{\\bm z}^\\top \\left(\\widehat{A}^++\\widehat{A}^-\\right){\\bm z}\\right\\}\n \\right)^{-1}.\n\\end{equation*}}\n{\n% Then, obtaining $\\mathcal{L}_i$ is simplified to solving three Rayleigh quotients with an additional constraint ${|{u}_{*}|<1}$. \nThe remaining step is to solve the Rayleigh quotient with the additional constraint $|{u}_{*}|<1$:\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\widetilde{\\mathcal{L}}_{i}:=\\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}\\in\\mathbb{R}^2,\\ \\Vert {\\bm z} \\Vert_2=1 \\atop {|{ u}_{*}|<1}}{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}\\ {\\bm z},\n\\end{equation*}}\nwhich is the same as the standard Rayleigh quotient except for a further validation of the associated optimizer ${\\bm w}=({u}_*,1)^\\top$. If the optimizer ${\\bm w}$ associated with the maximal eigenvalue satisfies $|{u}_{*}|<1$, then the solution is consistent with the standard Rayleigh quotient. Otherwise, we compare the remaining feasible eigenvalues with the boundary values. Let $\\widehat{\\lambda}_1$ and $\\widehat{\\lambda}_2$ be the eigenvalues of the model matrix $\\widehat{A}$, and $\\widehat{\\lambda}_1 > \\widehat{\\lambda}_2$. Then we have\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\widetilde{\\mathcal{L}}_{i}=\n \\begin{cases}\n \\max\\left\\{0,\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_1\\right\\} & \\text{if}\\ \\left|{u}_{*,1}\\right|<1\\\\\n \\max\\left\\{0,\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_2,\\ \\frac{d}{a},\\ \\frac{f}{c}\\right\\} & \\text{if}\\ \\left|{u}_{*,1}\\right|\\geq 1\\ \\text{and}\\ \\left|{u}_{*,2}\\right|<1\\\\\n \\max\\left\\{0,\\ \\frac{d}{a},\\ \\frac{f}{c}\\right\\} & \\text{otherwise}\n \\end{cases},\n\\end{equation*}\nwhere {$u_{*,1}$ and $u_{*,2}$ are the first component of the optimizers corresponding to} $\\widehat{\\lambda}_1$ and $\\widehat{\\lambda}_2$, respectively. The definitions of $d$, $e$, and $f$ are consistent with $\\widehat{A}$.\n{The eigenvalues of the matrices $\\widehat{A}^{\\star}$ ($\\star\\in\\{+,-\\}$) and $\\widehat{A}^+ + \\widehat{A}^-$ are listed below, denoted by $\\widehat{\\lambda}_{k}^{\\star}$ and $\\widehat{\\lambda}_{k}^{*}$ ($k = 1,2$):\n\\begin{align}\n \\widehat{\\lambda}_k^{\\star} &= \\frac{(-1)^{k-1}\\sigma^{\\star}+{\\tt sign}(\\star)(2af^{\\star}-{b}{e^{\\star}}+2cd^{\\star})}{4ac-{b}^2},\\label{1Deig1}\\\\\n \\widehat{\\lambda}_k^{*} &= \\frac{(-1)^{k-1}\\sigma^{*}+2af^{*}-{b}{e^{*}}+2cd^{*}}{4ac-{b}^2},\\label{1Deig2}\n\\end{align}\nwhere\n\\begin{align}\n d^{*}&:=d^+-d^-,\\qquad e^{*}:=e^+ - e^-,\\qquad f^{*}:=f^+-f^-,\\nonumber\\\\\n \\sigma^{\\widehat{\\star}}&:=2\\sqrt{(af^{\\widehat{\\star}}-cd^{\\widehat{\\star}})^2-(af^{\\widehat{\\star}}+cd^{\\widehat{\\star}}){b}{e^{\\widehat{\\star}}}+ac{\\left(e^{\\widehat{\\star}}\\right)}^2+{b}^2d^{\\widehat{\\star}} f^{\\widehat{\\star}}},\\quad {\\widehat{\\star}\\in\\{\\star, *\\}}.\\label{sigma1D}\n\\end{align}\nThe non-negativity of the radicand in \\eqref{sigma1D} is a fundamental prerequisite for the well-posedness of $\\sigma^{\\widehat{\\star}}$. {If $b=0$, the radicand reduces to $(af^{\\widehat{\\star}}-cd^{\\widehat{\\star}})^2+ac\\big(e^{\\widehat{\\star}}\\big)^2\\ge0$. Thus, in the quadratic-form representation below, we only need to consider $b\\ne0$.} We rewrite it as a symmetric quadratic form to reveal its underlying mathematical structure:\n\\[\n\\sigma^{\\widehat{\\star}} = \\sqrt{\\mathbf{r}^\\top \\mathbf{Q} \\mathbf{r}}, \\quad \\text{where} \\quad \\mathbf{r} = \\left( \\frac{d^{\\widehat{\\star}}}{a}, \\frac{e^{\\widehat{\\star}}}{b}, \\frac{f^{\\widehat{\\star}}}{c} \\right)^\\top,\n\\]\nand the symmetric matrix $\\mathbf{Q}$ is defined as\n\\[\n\\mathbf{Q} = 2ac\n\\begin{pmatrix}\n 2ac & -b^2 & b^2-2ac \\\\\n -b^2 & 2b^2 & -b^2 \\\\\n b^2-2ac & -b^2 & 2ac\n\\end{pmatrix}.\n\\]\nWe prove that $\\mathbf{Q}$ is symmetric positive semi-definite for all admissible states by verifying that all the eigenvalues of ${\\bf Q}$ are non-negative. The three eigenvalues of ${\\bf Q}$\n\\[\n\\lambda_{\\bf Q}^{(1)} = 0,\\qquad \\lambda_{\\bf Q}^{(2)} = 6ab^2c,\\qquad \\lambda_{\\bf Q}^{(3)} = 2ac(4ac-b^2)\n\\]\nare all non-negative, following the definitions of $a,b,c$ and the admissible state ${\\bf U}_i^L\\in\\mathcal{G}_{\\epsilon}^{(1)}$.\nTherefore, the quadratic form $\\langle \\mathbf{r}, \\mathbf{Q} \\mathbf{r} \\rangle$ is non-negative for all $\\mathbf{r}$, and $\\sigma^{\\widehat{\\star}}$ is well-defined.\n}\n\n{\nThe key components in computing the $q$-limiting factor are the eigenvalues of matrices $\\widehat{A}^{\\star}$, defined in \\eqref{Astar}. It is necessary to explicitly clarify the situation where $\\widehat{A}^{\\star}$ is positive definite, positive semi-definite, or indefinite. We summarize it in the following proposition to improve the readability and rigor.\n\n\\begin{proposition}[One-dimensional classification of the matrix $\\widehat{A}^{\\star}$]\nAssume that the low-order state ${\\bf U}_i^L$ produced by \\eqref{uLF1DRHD} satisfies ${\\bf U}_i^L\\in \\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon^{(1)}$ for all $i$, where $\\epsilon>0$. Then $\\widehat{A}^{\\star}$ in \\eqref{Astar} is\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item positive definite $\\iff$ {\\tt sign}$(\\star)(2af^{\\star}+2cd^{\\star}-be^{\\star})>0\\ $ and $\\ 4d^{\\star}f^{\\star}-(e^{\\star})^2>0$,\n \\item positive semi-definite $\\iff$ {\\tt sign}$(\\star)(2af^{\\star}+2cd^{\\star}-be^{\\star})\\geq0\\ $ and $\\ 4d^{\\star}f^{\\star}-(e^{\\star})^2\\geq0$,\n \\item indefinite $\\iff$ $4d^{\\star}f^{\\star}-(e^{\\star})^2<0$.\n\\end{itemize}\n\\end{proposition}\n\\begin{proof}\n Since ${\\bf U}_i^L\\in \\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon^{(1)}$ for all $i$, we have $a>0$, $c>0$, and $4ac-b^2\\geq0$. A matrix is positive definite if and only if its trace and determinant are both positive, which are consistent with {\\tt sign}$(\\star)(2af^{\\star}+2cd^{\\star}-be^{\\star})>0\\ $ and $\\ 4d^{\\star}f^{\\star}-(e^{\\star})^2>0$ for $\\widehat{A}^{\\star}$. Similar arguments can be applied to the other two cases.\n\\end{proof}\n}\n\n\\begin{remark}[Two branches in the rational parameterization]\\label{rem:branches}\nThe rational map \\eqref{1Dvstar_para} is two-to-one: $u_*$ and $1/u_*$ generate the same $v_*\\in(-1,1)$ and hence the same normal vector ${\\bm n}_*(v_*)$.\n{Consequently, the optimization may be restricted to either branch, $|u_*| < 1$ or $|u_*| > 1$, as they yield the same final result.}\n\\end{remark}\n\n\n\\begin{remark}[Conservative enforcement of GQL constraints]\\label{rem:qest}\n\tFor any fixed parameter $v_*\\in(-1,1)$, the inequality ${\\bf U}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*(v_*) \\ge \\epsilon$ defines a single linear half-space. In a scalar setting, this would admit a parameter-dependent Zalesak coefficient, denoted here as $R_i^-(v_*)$, which depends on the sign of the projected anti-diffusive flux $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+1/2}^A\\cdot{\\bm n}_*(v_*)$.\n\tHowever, the admissible set $G$ is the intersection of all such half-spaces. To guarantee that the updated solution ${\\bf U}_i^{n+1}$ resides in $G$, we require a single limiting coefficient that enforces the constraint \\emph{uniformly} for all $v_*$.\n\tSince the flux sign may vary with $v_*$, we compute a cell-wise constant $\\mathcal{L}_i$ via the worst-case minimization problem \\eqref{1DbeforeQuadForm}, ensuring that $\\mathcal{L}_i \\le R_i^-(v_*)$ for all $v_* \\in (-1,1)$. We then define the (uniform) interface limiting factor as\n\t\\begin{equation}\\label{alphaq1D}\n\t\t\\widehat{\\theta}_{i+1/2}^q := \\min\\{\\mathcal{L}_i,\\ \\mathcal{L}_{i+1}\\}.\n\t\\end{equation}\n\tThis construction guarantees that ${\\bf U}_i^{n+1}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*(v_*)\\ge\\epsilon$ holds for all $v_*$, which is sufficient to prove the PCP property in Theorem~\\ref{thm:1DBP}.\n\\end{remark}\n\n \n\n\n\n\nBefore ending this subsection, we summarize the one-dimensional PCP property.\n\n\\begin{theorem}[One-dimensional PCP flux limiter]\\label{thm:1DBP}\nAssume that, at a given SSP-RK stage, the low-order state ${\\bf U}_i^L$ produced by \\eqref{uLF1DRHD} satisfies ${\\bf U}_i^L\\in \\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon^{(1)}$ for all $i$, where $\\epsilon>0$.\nLet the density limiting factors $\\theta_{i+1/2}^D$ be defined by \\eqref{alphaD1D}, and let the $q$-limiting factors $\\widehat{\\theta}_{i+1/2}^q$ be defined by \\eqref{alphaq1D}.\nDefine the final interface limiter by\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:theta_final_1d}\n \\theta_{i+1/2}:=\\min\\bigl\\{\\theta_{i+1/2}^D,\\ \\widehat{\\theta}_{i+1/2}^q\\bigr\\}.\n\\end{equation}\nThen the flux-corrected update \\eqref{uPCP1D} satisfies ${\\bf U}_i^{n+1}\\in \\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon^{(1)}$ for all $i$.\n\nMoreover, if ${\\bf U}_i^n\\in\\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon^{(1)}$ and the time step satisfies the standard LF CFL condition $\\alpha\\,\\Delta t/\\Delta x\\le 1/2$, then the low-order update \\eqref{uLF1DRHD}--\\eqref{eq:LF_loworder} yields ${\\bf U}_i^L\\in\\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon^{(1)}$, and hence the overall limited high-order scheme is PCP.\n\\end{theorem}\n\n\\begin{proof}\nThe set $\\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon^{(2)}$ in \\eqref{1DRHDGQLeps} is an intersection of half-spaces defined by the linear functionals\n\\[\n \\ell_D({\\bf U}) := D({\\bf U}) = {\\bf U}\\cdot{\\bm n}_D,\\qquad {\\bm n}_D=(1,0,0)^\\top,\n\\]\nand\n\\[\n \\ell_{v_*}({\\bf U}) := {\\bf U}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*(v_*),\\qquad\n {\\bm n}_*(v_*):=\\bigl(-\\sqrt{1-v_*^2},\\,-v_*,\\,1\\bigr)^\\top,\\quad v_*\\in(-1,1).\n\\]\nSince $\\ell_D$ and $\\ell_{v_*}$ are linear in ${\\bf U}$, taking the dot product of \\eqref{uPCP1D} with a fixed ${\\bm n}$ yields a scalar flux-corrected transport (FCT) update for the scalar quantity $\\ell_{\\bm n}({\\bf U}_i)$, with anti-diffusive flux $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+1/2}^A\\cdot{\\bm n}$.\n\n\\medskip\n\\noindent\\textbf{(i) Density constraint.}\nWith ${\\bm n}={\\bm n}_D$, the scalar FCT lower-bound limiting (Zalesak limiter) shows that choosing $\\theta_{i+1/2}\\le \\theta_{i+1/2}^D$ guarantees\n$D({\\bf U}_i^{n+1})={\\bf U}_i^{n+1}\\cdot{\\bm n}_D\\ge \\epsilon$ for all $i$.\n\n\\medskip\n\\noindent\\textbf{(ii) GQL constraints.}\nFix any $v_*\\in(-1,1)$ and take ${\\bm n}={\\bm n}_*(v_*)$. The same scalar FCT argument shows that if the interface factors satisfy\n$\\theta_{i+1/2}\\le \\theta_{i+1/2}(v_*)$ for all interfaces, where $\\theta_{i+1/2}(v_*)$ is the Zalesak coefficient associated with $\\ell_{v_*}$, then\n${\\bf U}_i^{n+1}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*(v_*)\\ge \\epsilon$ for all $i$.\nOur construction computes cell-wise constants $\\mathcal{L}_i$ such that $\\mathcal{L}_i\\le R_i^-(v_*)$ for all $v_*\\in(-1,1)$, and then sets\n$\\widehat{\\theta}_{i+1/2}^q=\\min\\{\\mathcal{L}_i,\\mathcal{L}_{i+1}\\}$; see \\eqref{alphaq1D}--\\eqref{1DbeforeQuadForm}.\nTherefore $\\theta_{i+1/2}\\le \\widehat{\\theta}_{i+1/2}^q\\le \\theta_{i+1/2}(v_*)$ for all $v_*$, implying ${\\bf U}_i^{n+1}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*(v_*)\\ge \\epsilon$ for all $v_*$.\n\n\\medskip\nCombining (i)--(ii) and \\eqref{1DRHDGQLeps} yields ${\\bf U}_i^{n+1}\\in\\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon^{(2)}$ for all $i$.\nBy the equivalence \\eqref{eq:1219}--\\eqref{1DRHDGQLeps}, this implies ${\\bf U}_i^{n+1}\\in\\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon^{(1)}$.\n\\end{proof}\n\n\n% \\begin{itemize}\n% \\item $|{u}_*|<1$:\n% \\begin{align*}\n% a = E_{i}^L+D_{i}^L-\\epsilon,\\quad b&=2m_{i}^L,\\quad c=E_{i}^L-D_{i}^L-\\epsilon,\\\\\n% d^{+}=\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,E}+\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,D},\\quad\n% e^{+}&=2\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,m},\\quad\n% f^{+}=\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,E}-\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,D},\\\\\n% d^{-}=\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i-\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,E}+\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i-\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,D},\\quad\n% e^{-}&=2\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i-\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,m},\\quad\n% f^{-}=\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i-\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,E}-\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i-\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,D}.\n% \\end{align*}\n% \\item $|{u}_*|>1$:\n% \\begin{align*}\n% a = E_{i}^L-D_{i}^L-\\epsilon,\\quad b&=2m_{i}^L,\\quad c=E_{i}^L+D_{i}^L-\\epsilon,\\\\\n% d^{+}=\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,E}-\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,D},\\quad\n% e^{+}&=2\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,m},\\quad\n% f^{+}=\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,E}+\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,D},\\\\\n% d^{-}=\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i-\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,E}-\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i-\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,D},\\quad\n% e^{-}&=2\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i-\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,m},\\quad\n% f^{-}=\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i-\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,E}+\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i-\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,D}.\n% \\end{align*}\n% \\end{itemize}\n\n\n% \\begin{table}[!thb] \n% \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.5}\n% \\centering\n% \\belowrulesep=0pt\n% \\aboverulesep=0pt\n% \\caption{Coefficients associated with model matrix $\\widehat{A}_{\\bf s}$.}\n% \\label{tab:1DQuadCoeff}\n% % \\scalebox{0.8}{\n% \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3mm}{\n% \\begin{tabular}{c|cccccc}\n% \\toprule[1.5pt]\n% {} &\n% {$a$} &\n% {$b$} &\n% {$c$} &\n% {$d^{\\pm}$} &\n% {$e^{\\pm}$} &\n% {$f^{\\pm}$} \\\\ \n% \\midrule[1.5pt]\n% {$|{\\bf u}_*|<1$} & $E_{i}^L+D_{i}^L-\\epsilon$ & $2m_{i}^L$ & $E_{i}^L-D_{i}^L-\\epsilon$ & $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,E}+\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,D}$ & $2\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,m}$ & $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,E}-\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,D}$ \\\\\n% \\midrule\n% {$|{\\bf u}_*|>1$} & $E_{i}^L-D_{i}^L-\\epsilon$ & $2m_{i}^L$ & $E_{i}^L+D_{i}^L-\\epsilon$ & $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,E}-\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,D}$ & $2\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,m}$ & $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,E}+\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm\\frac{1}{2}}^{A,D}$ \\\\\n% \\bottomrule[1.5pt]\n% \\end{tabular}\n% }\n% % }\n% \\end{table}\n\n% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\\subsection{Multi-dimensional case}\nThe discussions about the case $d = 1$ in \\eqref{eq:RHD3D} can be easily generalized to $d = 2$ and $d = 3$. This is because the GQL tools conveniently transform the dimension of computational variables ${\\bf U}$ and ${\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}}$ into that of the introduced auxiliary ones. For uniform rectangular cells, we only need to apply the one-dimensional flux limiter in each spatial dimension separately in the finite difference framework.\nTo make the notation clear, we use $y$ and $z$ to represent the other two spatial dimensions, rather than $x_2$ and $x_3$ in \\eqref{eq:RHD3D}. We analyze the two-dimensional case and provide a brief summary of the three-dimensional case.\n\nThe finite difference FCT scheme for the two-dimensional RHD\n\\[\n {\\bf U}_t+{\\bf F}({\\bf U})_x+{\\bf G}({\\bf U})_y = 0,\n\\]\n\\[\n {\\bf U} = \n \\begin{pmatrix}\n D \\\\ m_x \\\\ m_y \\\\ E\n \\end{pmatrix},\n \\qquad\n {\\bf F}({\\bf U}) = \n \\begin{pmatrix}\n D v_x \\\\ m_xv_x+p \\\\ m_yv_x \\\\ m_x\n \\end{pmatrix},\n \\qquad\n {\\bf G}({\\bf U}) = \n \\begin{pmatrix}\n D v_y \\\\ m_xv_y \\\\ m_yv_y+p \\\\ m_y\n \\end{pmatrix}\n\\]\ncan be formulated as\n\\begin{equation}\\label{uLF2DRHD}\n {\\bf U}_{ij}^{L} := {\\bf U}_{ij}^n\n-\\frac{\\Delta t}{\\Delta x}\\left(\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+\\frac{1}{2},j}^L-\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i-\\frac{1}{2},j}^L\\right)\n-\\frac{\\Delta t}{\\Delta y}\\left(\\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}_{i,j+\\frac{1}{2}}^L-\\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}_{i,j-\\frac{1}{2}}^L\\right),\n\\end{equation}\n\\begin{equation}\\label{2DFE}\n {\\bf U}_{ij}^{n+1} = {\\bf U}_{ij}^L\n-\\frac{\\Delta t}{\\Delta x}\\left(\\theta_{i+\\frac{1}{2},j}\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+\\frac{1}{2},j}^A-\\theta_{i-\\frac{1}{2},j}\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i-\\frac{1}{2},j}^A\\right)\n-\\frac{\\Delta t}{\\Delta y}\\left(\\theta_{i,j+\\frac{1}{2}}\\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}_{i,j+\\frac{1}{2}}^A-\\theta_{i,j-\\frac{1}{2}}\\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}_{i,j-\\frac{1}{2}}^A\\right).\n\\end{equation}\n\nThe density limiter is similar to the one-dimensional case, but it requires computation in both the $x$ and $y$ directions. Following Zalesak's notation \\cite{zalesak2012design}, for a fixed vector ${\\bm n}$, we define\n\\begin{align*}\n P^{-}_{ij} &= \\Delta y\\left[\\min\\left(0, -\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^{A}_{i+\\frac{1}{2},j}\\cdot{\\bm n}\\right) + \\min\\left(0, \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^{A}_{i-\\frac{1}{2},j}\\cdot{\\bm n}\\right)\\right]\n +\\Delta x\\left[\\min\\left(0, -\\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}^{A}_{i,j+\\frac{1}{2}}\\cdot{\\bm n}\\right) + \\min\\left(0, \\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}^{A}_{i,j-\\frac{1}{2}}\\cdot{\\bm n}\\right)\\right].\\\\\n Q^{-}_{ij} &= \\frac{\\Delta x\\Delta y}{\\Delta t}\\left(\\epsilon - {\\bf U}^{L}_{ij}\\cdot{\\bm n}\\right),\\quad {\\bf U}^{L}_{ij}\\ \\text{is defined in }\\eqref{uLF2DRHD}.\\\\\n R^{-}_{ij} &= \n \\begin{cases}\n \\min\\left(1, \\frac{Q^{-}_{ij}}{P^{-}_{ij}}\\right), & \\text{if}\\quad P^{-}_{ij} < 0,\\\\\n 1,& \\text{otherwise}.\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{align*}\nTaking ${\\bm n} = {\\bm n}_D=(1,0,0,0)^\\top$ (so that ${\\bf U}\\cdot{\\bm n}_D=D({\\bf U})$) and using $\\epsilon = \\min\\bigl\\{10^{-13},D({\\bf U}_{ij}^L)\\bigr\\}$, the coefficients of the density flux limiter are\n{\\begin{align*}\n \\theta_{i+\\frac{1}{2},j}^D = \n \\begin{cases}\n R_{ij}^- & \\text{if}\\ \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+\\frac{1}{2},j}^{A}\\cdot{\\bm n}_D \\geq 0, \\\\\n R_{i+1,j}^- & \\text{if}\\ \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+\\frac{1}{2},j}^{A}\\cdot{\\bm n}_D < 0.\n \\end{cases},\n \\qquad\\qquad\n \\theta_{i,j+\\frac{1}{2}}^D = \n \\begin{cases}\n R_{ij}^- & \\text{if}\\ \\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}_{i,j+\\frac{1}{2}}^{A}\\cdot{\\bm n}_D \\geq 0, \\\\\n R_{i,j+1}^- & \\text{if}\\ \\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}_{i,j+\\frac{1}{2}}^{A}\\cdot{\\bm n}_D < 0.\n \\end{cases},\n\\end{align*}\nwhere ${\\bm n}_D:=(1,0,0,0)^\\top$ here.}\n\nThe limiter for $q({\\bf U})=E-\\sqrt{D^2+|{\\bm m}|^2}\\geq\\epsilon$ is a little different. The main difference lies in the dimension of the GQL auxiliary variable ${\\bm v}_*\\in\\mathbb{B}_1({\\bf 0})\\subseteq\\mathbb{R}^2$. The GQL representation of the admissible state set in the two-dimensional case is\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon^{\\tt 2D}=\\left\\{{\\bf U}\\in\\mathbb{R}^4 \\mid D({\\bf U})\\geq\\epsilon,\\ {\\bf U}\\cdot{\\bm n_*}\\geq \\epsilon,\\ {\\bm n_*}=\\left(-\\sqrt{1-|{\\bm v}_*|^2},\\ -{\\bm v}_*^\\top,\\ 1\\right)^\\top,\\ \\forall\\ {\\bm v}_*\\in\\mathbb{B}_1({\\bf 0})\\subseteq\\mathbb{R}^2\\right\\}.\n\\end{equation*}\nAs in the one-dimensional case, we fix a small parameter $\\epsilon>0$ such that the low-order update satisfies ${\\bf U}_{ij}^L\\in \\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon^{\\tt 2D}$ for all cells. In computation, at each SSP-RK stage we set $\\epsilon=\\min\\bigl\\{10^{-13},\\ q({\\bf U}_{ij}^L)\\bigr\\}$.\nWe generalize the stereographic-type transformation in \\eqref{1Dvstar_para} to higher dimensions (a rational parameterization of the unit ball) and obtain\n\\begin{equation}\\label{2Dvstar_para}\n {\\bm v}_*:=\\frac{2{\\bm u}_{*}}{1+\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2^2} {~~\\mbox{ with } \\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1 \\quad \\implies \\quad \n {\\bm n}_*({\\bm u}_*)=\\left(-\\frac{1-\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2^2}{1+\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2^2},\\ -\\frac{2{\\bm u}_{*}^\\top}{1+\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2^2},\\ 1\\right)^\\top,}\n\\end{equation}\nwhich has the same form as the one-dimensional case because we apply the same parameterization for all velocity components. Therefore, it is also applicable to the three-dimensional RHD. Next comes the key step. We need to solve the following optimization problem\n\\begin{equation*}\n (P_2): \\mathcal{L}_{ij} = \\min\\limits_{{\\bm v}_*\\in\\mathbb{B}_1({\\bf 0})\\subseteq\\mathbb{R}^2}\n \\frac{Q^{-}_{ij}}{P^{-}_{ij}}.\n\\end{equation*}\n{\nLet ${\\bm w}:=({\\bm u}_*^\\top,1)^\\top\\in\\mathbb{R}^3$. Define $\\widehat{A}_x^{\\star}:=\\Delta y\\widetilde{A}_x^{\\star}$, $\\widehat{A}_y^{\\star}:=\\Delta x\\widetilde{A}_y^{\\star}$, and the matrix \n\\begin{equation} \\label{2DQuadCoeff}\n \\widetilde{A}_s^{\\star}:=R^{-\\top}A_s^{\\star} R^{-1} = {\\tt sign}(\\star)\n \\begin{pmatrix}\n \\frac{d_s^{\\star}}{a}\\mathcal{I}_{2\\times2} & \\frac{d_s^{\\star}{\\bm b}-a{\\bm e}_s^{\\star}}{a\\sqrt{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}} \\\\\n \\frac{d_s^{\\star}{\\bm b}^\\top-a({\\bm e}_s^{\\star})^\\top}{a\\sqrt{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}} &\n \\frac{4a^2f_s^{\\star}-2a{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}_s^{\\star}+d_s^{\\star}|{\\bm b}|^2}{a\\left(4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2\\right)}\n \\end{pmatrix},\\qquad s = x,y,\\quad \\star\\in\\{+,-\\}\n\\end{equation}\nwith the coefficients listed in Table \\ref{tab:2DQuadCoeff}.\nTo simplify the notation and make our presentation clearer, we introduce the following matrix and vector:\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\mathbf{M}_d = \\begin{pmatrix} 1 & {\\bf 0}_d^\\top & 1 \\\\ {\\bf 0}_d & 2\\mathcal{I}_{d\\times d} & {\\bf 0}_d \\\\ -1 & {\\bf 0}_d^\\top & 1 \\end{pmatrix}, \\quad \n \\mathbf{S}_d = \\begin{pmatrix} \\epsilon \\\\ {\\bf 0}_d \\\\ \\epsilon \\end{pmatrix},\n\\end{equation*}\nwhere $d$ is consistent with the space dimension.\nFollowing the idea in the one-dimensional case and applying Lemma \\ref{lem:RayleighQ} for $K = 4$, we have\n\n\\begin{align}\n \\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ij}:&=\\max\\limits_{{\\bm w}\\in\\mathbb{R}^3 \\atop {\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1} }\n \\frac{\\Delta y\\left[\\max\\left(0,{\\bm w}^\\top A_x^+{\\bm w}\\right)+\\max\\left(0,{\\bm w}^\\top A_x^-{\\bm w}\\right)\\right]\n +\\Delta x\\left[\\max\\left(0,{\\bm w}^\\top A_y^+{\\bm w}\\right)+\\max\\left(0,{\\bm w}^\\top A_y^-{\\bm w}\\right)\\right]}\n {{\\bm w}^\\top B{\\bm w}}\\nonumber \\\\\n &=\\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}:=R{\\bm w}\\ \\in\\ \\mathbb{R}^3 \\atop {\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1} }\n \\frac{\\Delta y\\left[\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widetilde{A}_x^+{\\bm z}\\right)+\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widetilde{A}_x^-{\\bm z}\\right)\\right]\n +\\Delta x\\left[\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widetilde{A}_y^+{\\bm z}\\right)+\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widetilde{A}_y^-{\\bm z}\\right)\\right]}\n {{\\bm z}^\\top {\\bm z}} \\nonumber \\\\\n % &=\\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}\\in\\mathbb{R}^3,\\ \\Vert {\\bm z} \\Vert_2=1 \\atop \\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1 }\n % \\Big\\{\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\left(\\Delta y\\widetilde{A}_x^+\\right){\\bm z}\\right)\n % +\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\left(\\Delta y\\widetilde{A}_x^-\\right){\\bm z}\\right)\\\\ &\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\n % +\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\left(\\Delta x\\widetilde{A}_y^+\\right){\\bm z}\\right)\n % +\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\left(\\Delta x\\widetilde{A}_y^-\\right){\\bm z}\\right)\\Big\\}\\\\\n &=\\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}\\in\\mathbb{R}^3,\\ \\Vert {\\bm z} \\Vert_2=1,\\ {\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1} }\n \\Big\\{\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_x^+{\\bm z}\\right)\n +\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_x^-{\\bm z}\\right)\n +\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_y^+{\\bm z}\\right)\n +\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_y^-{\\bm z}\\right)\\Big\\},\\nonumber \\\\\n % &=\\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}\\in\\mathbb{R}^3,\\ \\Vert {\\bm z} \\Vert_2=1,\\ {\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1} }\n % \\max\\Big\\{0,\\ {\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_x^+{\\bm z},\\ {\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_x^-{\\bm z},\\ \n % {\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_y^+{\\bm z},\\ {\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_y^-{\\bm z},\\ \n % {\\bm z}^\\top \\big(\\widehat{A}_x^++\\widehat{A}_x^-\\big) {\\bm z},\\ \n % {\\bm z}^\\top \\big(\\widehat{A}_x^++\\widehat{A}_y^+\\big) {\\bm z},\\nonumber \\\\ & \\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\quad\\ \n % {\\bm z}^\\top \\big(\\widehat{A}_x^++\\widehat{A}_y^-\\big) {\\bm z},\\ \n % {\\bm z}^\\top \\big(\\widehat{A}_x^-+\\widehat{A}_y^+\\big) {\\bm z},\\ \n % {\\bm z}^\\top \\big(\\widehat{A}_x^-+\\widehat{A}_y^-\\big) {\\bm z},\\ \n % {\\bm z}^\\top \\big(\\widehat{A}_y^++\\widehat{A}_y^-\\big) {\\bm z},\\nonumber \\\\ & \\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\quad\\ \n % {\\bm z}^\\top \\big(\\widehat{A}_x^++\\widehat{A}_x^-+\\widehat{A}_y^+\\big) {\\bm z},\\ \n % {\\bm z}^\\top \\big(\\widehat{A}_x^++\\widehat{A}_x^-+\\widehat{A}_y^-\\big) {\\bm z},\\ \n % {\\bm z}^\\top \\big(\\widehat{A}_x^++\\widehat{A}_y^++\\widehat{A}_y^-\\big) {\\bm z},\\nonumber \\\\ & \\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\quad\\ \n % {\\bm z}^\\top \\big(\\widehat{A}_x^-+\\widehat{A}_y^++\\widehat{A}_y^-\\big) {\\bm z},\\ \n % {\\bm z}^\\top \\big(\\widehat{A}_x^++\\widehat{A}_x^-+\\widehat{A}_y^++\\widehat{A}_y^-\\big) {\\bm z}\\Big\\}\\nonumber\\\\\n &=\\max\\Big\\{0,\\ \n \\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}\\in\\mathbb{R}^3,\\ \\Vert {\\bm z} \\Vert_2=1,\\ {\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1} }{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_x^+{\\bm z},\\ \\ldots,\\ \n \\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}\\in\\mathbb{R}^3,\\ \\Vert {\\bm z} \\Vert_2=1,\\ {\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1} }{\\bm z}^\\top \\big(\\widehat{A}_x^++\\widehat{A}_x^-+\\widehat{A}_y^++\\widehat{A}_y^-\\big) {\\bm z}\\Big\\}.\\label{16mat2D}\n\\end{align}\n}\n\n\\begin{table}[!thb] \n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.8}\n \\centering\n \\belowrulesep=0pt\n \\aboverulesep=0pt\n \\caption{Formulae for coefficients in \\eqref{2DQuadCoeff}.}\n \\label{tab:2DQuadCoeff}\n % \\scalebox{0.99}{\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3mm}{\n \\begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}\n \\toprule[1.5pt]\n {} & {$\\left(a,{\\bm b}^\\top,c\\right)^\\top$} & {$\\left(d_x^{\\pm},({\\bm e}_x^{\\pm})^\\top,f_x^{\\pm}\\right)^\\top$} & {$\\left(d_y^{\\pm},({\\bm e}_y^{\\pm})^\\top,f_y^{\\pm}\\right)^\\top$} \\\\ \n \\midrule[1.5pt]\n {$\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1$} & ${\\bf M}_2{\\bf U}_{ij}^L-{\\bf S}_2$ & ${\\bf M}_2\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm{1}/{2},j}^{A}$ & ${\\bf M}_2\\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}_{i,j\\pm{1}/{2}}^{A}$ \\\\\n % {$\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2>1$} & ${\\bf M}_2^{>1}{\\bf U}_{ij}^L-{\\bf S}_2$ & ${\\bf M}_2^{>1}\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i\\pm{1}/{2},j}^{A}$ & ${\\bf M}_2^{>1}\\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}_{i,j\\pm{1}/{2}}^{A}$ \\\\\n \\bottomrule[1.5pt]\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n % }\n\\end{table}\n\n\\begin{remark}[On restricting to $\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1$]\\label{rem:md-branch}\nThe multi-dimensional mapping \\eqref{2Dvstar_para} (and its 3D analogue) is also two-to-one: ${\\bm u}_*$ and ${\\bm u}_*/\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2^2$ generate the same ${\\bm v}_*\\in\\mathbb{B}_1(0)$ and hence the same normal vector ${\\bm n}_*( {\\bm v}_*)$.\nTherefore the cases $\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1$ and $\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2>1$ are equivalent.\nIn practice we restrict the optimization to $\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1$; the other branch can be treated analogously.\n\\end{remark}\n\nFrom \\eqref{16mat2D}, we see that the solution to $\\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ij}$ is the maximum of $2^4=16$ maximal eigenvalues of associated matrices. Let ${\\bm s}:=(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)\\in\\{0,1\\}^4$ be an index vector, and $\\widehat{A}_{\\bm s}:=s_1\\widehat{A}_x^++s_2\\widehat{A}_x^-+s_3\\widehat{A}_y^++s_4\\widehat{A}_y^-$ contains all 16 possible combinations that make a difference in solving \\eqref{16mat2D}. The basic model of $\\widehat{A}_{\\bm s}$ can be expressed as\n\\begin{equation}\\label{basicmodel}\n \\widehat{A}_{\\bm s}=\n \\begin{pmatrix}\n \\frac{d}{a}\\mathcal{I}_{2\\times2} & \\frac{d{\\bm b}-a{\\bm e}}{a\\sqrt{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}} \\\\\n \\frac{d{\\bm b}^\\top-a{\\bm e}^\\top}{a\\sqrt{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}} & \n \\frac{4a^2f-2a{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}+|{\\bm b}|^2d}{a(4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2)}\n \\end{pmatrix} = \n \\begin{pmatrix}\n \\frac{d}{a} & 0 & \\frac{b_1d-ae_1}{a\\sqrt{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}} \\\\\n 0 & \\frac{d}{a} & \\frac{b_2d-ae_2}{a\\sqrt{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}} \\\\\n \\frac{b_1d-ae_1}{a\\sqrt{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}} & \n \\frac{b_2d-ae_2}{a\\sqrt{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}} &\n \\frac{4a^2f-2a{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}+|{\\bm b}|^2d}{a(4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2)}\n \\end{pmatrix},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere ${\\bm b}=(b_1,b_2)^\\top,\\ {\\bm e}=(e_1,e_2)^\\top.$\nThree eigenvalues of $\\widehat{A}_{\\bm s}$ are\n{\\begin{equation}\\label{basicmodel:evalue}\n \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(k)} = \\frac{(-1)^{k-1}\\sigma_{\\bm s}+2af-{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}+2cd}{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}\\ \\ (k=1,2),\\quad\n % \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(1)} = \\frac{\\sigma_{\\bm s}+2af-{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}+2cd}{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2},\\quad\n % \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(2)} = \\frac{-\\sigma_{\\bm s}+2af-{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}+2cd}{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2},\\quad\n \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(3)} = \\frac{d}{a},\n\\end{equation}}\nwhere\n\\begin{equation} \\label{sigma2D}\n \\sigma_{\\bm s}:=\\sqrt{4\\Big((af-cd)^2-(af+cd)({\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e})+ac|{\\bm e}|^2+|{\\bm b}|^2df\\Big)-(b_1e_2-b_2e_1)^2}.\n\\end{equation}\n{\nThe non-negativity of the radicand in \\eqref{sigma2D} follows directly from the symmetric block structure of \\eqref{basicmodel}. Let\n\\[\n\\Delta:=4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2>0,\\qquad\n{\\bm h}:=\\frac{d{\\bm b}-a{\\bm e}}{a\\sqrt{\\Delta}},\\qquad\n g:=\\frac{4a^2f-2a{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}+|{\\bm b}|^2d}{a\\Delta}.\n\\]\nThen \\eqref{basicmodel} has the eigenvalue $d/a$ in the subspace orthogonal to ${\\bm h}$ (with the obvious multiplicity-two degeneracy if ${\\bm h}={\\bf 0}$), and its two remaining eigenvalues are those of the real symmetric $2\\times2$ matrix\n\\[\n\\begin{pmatrix} d/a & \\|{\\bm h}\\|_2 \\\\ \\|{\\bm h}\\|_2 & g \\end{pmatrix}.\n\\]\nConsequently,\n\\[\n\\sigma_{\\bm s}^2=\\frac{\\Delta^2}{4}\\left(\\left(g-\\frac{d}{a}\\right)^2+4\\|{\\bm h}\\|_2^2\\right)\\ge0,\n\\]\nwhich is algebraically equivalent to the radicand in \\eqref{sigma2D}. Hence $\\sigma_{\\bm s}$ is real and the eigenvalue formula \\eqref{basicmodel:evalue} is well-defined for all admissible states.\n}\nSince $\\sigma_{\\bm s}\\geq0$, the maximal eigenvalue of $\\widehat{A}_{\\bm s}$ is\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}:=\\max\\left\\{\\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(1)},\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(3)}\\right\\}.\n\\end{equation*}\nWe are also interested in the optimizer ${\\bm w} = ({\\bm u}_*^\\top, 1)^\\top\\in\\mathbb{R}^3$ when dealing with the additional constraint $\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1$. It can be found by multiplying the eigenvector ${\\bm z}$ associated with the maximal eigenvalue of $\\widehat{A}_{\\bm s}$ since we apply the substitution ${\\bm z}=R{\\bm w}$ to express $\\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ij}$ as a Rayleigh quotient.\n\\begin{align}\n {\\bm w}_{\\bm s}^{(1)} &= \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{c-\\frac{|{\\bm b}|^2}{4a}}}\\left(\\frac{{\\bm b}^\\top}{2a}+\\frac{(d{\\bm b}^\\top-a{\\bm e}^\\top)\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bm s}^{(1)}}{2a\\|a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}\\|_2^2},\\ 1\\right)^\\top,\\label{basicmodel:evector1}\\\\\n % {\\bm w}_{\\bm s}^{(1)} &= \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{c-\\frac{|{\\bm b}|^2}{4a}}}\\left(\\frac{b_1}{2a}+\\frac{(b_1d-ae_1)\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bm s}^{(1)}}{2a\\|a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}\\|_2^2},\\ \\frac{b_2}{2a}+\\frac{(b_2d-ae_2)\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bm s}^{(1)}}{2a\\|a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}\\|_2^2},\\ 1\\right)^\\top,\\label{basicmodel:evector1}\\\\\n {\\bm w}_{\\bm s}^{(2)} &= \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{c-\\frac{|{\\bm b}|^2}{4a}}}\\left(\\frac{{\\bm b}^\\top}{2a}-\\frac{(d{\\bm b}^\\top-a{\\bm e}^\\top)\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bm s}^{(2)}}{2a\\|a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}\\|_2^2},\\ 1\\right)^\\top,\\label{basicmodel:evector2}\\\\\n % {\\bm w}_{\\bm s}^{(2)} &= \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{c-\\frac{|{\\bm b}|^2}{4a}}}\\left(\\frac{b_1}{2a}-\\frac{(b_1d-ae_1)\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bm s}^{(2)}}{2a\\|a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}\\|_2^2},\\ \\frac{b_2}{2a}-\\frac{(b_2d-ae_2)\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bm s}^{(2)}}{2a\\|a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}\\|_2^2},\\ 1\\right)^\\top,\\label{basicmodel:evector2}\\\\\n {\\bm w}_{\\bm s}^{(3)} &= \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{a}}\\left(-\\frac{b_2d-ae_2}{b_1d-ae_1},\\ 1,\\ 0\\right)^\\top,\\label{basicmodel:evector3}\n\\end{align}\nwhere\n{\\begin{equation} \\label{basicemodel:evec_sig}\n \\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bm s}^{(k)} = a\\sigma_{\\bm s}+(-1)^k\\left(|{\\bm b}|^2d+2a^2f-2acd-a{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}\\right),\\quad k = 1,2.\n\\end{equation}}\nThe maximal eigenvalue may not be a feasible optimal solution if its corresponding eigenvector ${\\bm w} = ({\\bm u}_*^\\top, 1)^\\top$ does not satisfy $\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1$. We list this quantity for feasibility judgment for \\eqref{basicmodel:evector1}, \\eqref{basicmodel:evector2}, and \\eqref{basicmodel:evector3}:\n\\begin{align}\n \\left|{\\bm u}_{\\bm s}^{(1)}\\right|^2&=\\left(\\frac{b_1}{2a}+\\frac{(b_1d-ae_1)\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bm s}^{(1)}}{2a\\|a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}\\|_2^2}\\right)^2+\\left(\\frac{b_2}{2a}+\\frac{(b_2d-ae_2)\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bm s}^{(1)}}{2a\\|a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}\\|_2^2}\\right)^2,\\label{basicmodel:generalnorm1}\\\\\n \\left|{\\bm u}_{\\bm s}^{(2)}\\right|^2&=\\left(\\frac{b_1}{2a}-\\frac{(b_1d-ae_1)\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bm s}^{(2)}}{2a\\|a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}\\|_2^2}\\right)^2+\\left(\\frac{b_2}{2a}-\\frac{(b_2d-ae_2)\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bm s}^{(2)}}{2a\\|a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}\\|_2^2}\\right)^2,\\label{basicmodel:generalnorm2}\\\\\n \\left|{\\bm u}_{\\bm s}^{(3)}\\right|^2&=\\left(-\\frac{b_2d-ae_2}{b_1d-ae_1}\\right)^2+1^2\\geq1,\\ \\text{and the last component of ${\\bm w}_{\\bm s}^{(3)}$ is not 1}.\\label{basicmodel:generalnorm3}\n\\end{align}\nAll the above formulations correspond to the basic model of $\\widehat{A}_{\\bm s}$. {For a given index vector ${\\bm s}_0:=(s_1,s_2,s_3,s_4)^\\top$, we can obtain $\\widehat{A}_{{\\bm s}_0}$ by the corresponding choices of $d$, $e_1$, $e_2$, and $f$. To simplify the notation and make our presentation clearer, we introduce the base coefficient vectors:\n\\begin{equation*}\n {\\bm V}_d:=\n \\begin{pmatrix}\n \\Delta y\\ d_x^+\\\\\n -\\Delta y\\ d_x^-\\\\\n \\Delta x\\ d_y^+\\\\\n -\\Delta x\\ d_y^-\n \\end{pmatrix},\n \\quad\n {\\bm V}_{e_1}:=\n \\begin{pmatrix}\n \\Delta y\\ e_x^{+,1}\\\\\n -\\Delta y\\ e_x^{-,1}\\\\\n \\Delta x\\ e_y^{+,1}\\\\\n -\\Delta x\\ e_y^{-,1}\n \\end{pmatrix},\n \\quad\n {\\bm V}_{e_2}:=\n \\begin{pmatrix}\n \\Delta y\\ e_x^{+,2}\\\\\n -\\Delta y\\ e_x^{-,2}\\\\\n \\Delta x\\ e_y^{+,2}\\\\\n -\\Delta x\\ e_y^{-,2}\n \\end{pmatrix},\n \\quad\n {\\bm V}_f:=\n \\begin{pmatrix}\n \\Delta y\\ f_x^+\\\\\n -\\Delta y\\ f_x^-\\\\\n \\Delta x\\ f_y^+\\\\\n -\\Delta x\\ f_y^-\n \\end{pmatrix}.\n\\end{equation*}\nThen the coefficients $d,e_1,e_2,f$ associated with the index vector ${\\bm s}_0$ are given by\n\\begin{equation*}\n c_{\\star} = {\\bm s}_0\\cdot{\\bm V}_{c_{\\star}} = \\sum\\limits_{i=1}^4s_i\\ ({\\bm V}_{c_{\\star}})_i,\\qquad c_{\\star}\\in\\{d,e_1,e_2,f\\}.\n\\end{equation*}\nThis compact representation unifies all 16 possible sign combinations.\n}\n% The 15 different cases (except zero matrix for $\\widehat{A}_{{\\bm s}_0}$) are listed in Table \\ref{tab:2Dmat16general}.\n\nBefore the end, a special case should be verified. If the eigenvectors \\eqref{basicmodel:evector1} and \\eqref{basicmodel:evector2} are not well defined, i.e., $a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}={\\bf 0}$, we should check whether it is consistent with the general formulation. In this special case, the basic model $\\widehat{A}_{\\bm s}$ degenerates into\n\\begin{equation}\\label{basicmodel:special}\n \\widehat{A}_{\\bm s}=\n \\begin{pmatrix}\n \\frac{d}{a} & 0 & 0 \\\\\n 0 & \\frac{d}{a} & 0 \\\\\n 0 & 0 & \\frac{4a^2f-2a{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}+|{\\bm b}|^2d}{a(4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2)}\n \\end{pmatrix}.\n % ,\\qquad {\\bm b}=(b_1,b_2)^\\top,\\quad {\\bm e}=(e_1,e_2)^\\top.\n\\end{equation}\nThree eigenvalues of $\\widehat{A}_{\\bm s}$ are\n\\begin{equation}\\label{basicmodel:specialevalue}\n \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(1)} = \\frac{4af-{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}}{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2},\\quad\n \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(2)} = \\frac{d}{a},\\quad\n \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(3)} = \\frac{d}{a},\n\\end{equation}\nand the maximal eigenvalue is given by\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s} = \n \\begin{cases}\n \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(1)} = \\frac{4af-{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}}{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2} & \\text{if}\\ af>cd\\\\\n \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(2)} = \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(3)} = \\frac{d}{a} & \\text{otherwise}\n \\end{cases}.\n\\end{equation*}\nThe associated (scaled) eigenvectors are\n\\begin{align}\n {\\bm w}_{\\bm s}^{(1)} &= \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{c-\\frac{|{\\bm b}|^2}{4a}}}\\left(\\frac{{\\bm b}^\\top}{2a},\\ 1\\right)^\\top,\\label{basicmodel:specialevector1}\\\\\n % {\\bm w}_{\\bm s}^{(1)} &= \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{c-\\frac{|{\\bm b}|^2}{4a}}}\\left(\\frac{b_1}{2a},\\ \\frac{b_2}{2a},\\ 1\\right)^\\top,\\label{basicmodel:specialevector1}\\\\\n {\\bm w}_{\\bm s}^{(2)} &= \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{a}}\\left(0,\\ 1,\\ 0\\right)^\\top,\\label{basicmodel:specialevector2}\\\\\n {\\bm w}_{\\bm s}^{(3)} &= \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{a}}\\left(1,\\ 0,\\ 0\\right)^\\top.\\label{basicmodel:specialevector3}\n\\end{align}\nWe also list the quantity for feasibility judgment for \\eqref{basicmodel:specialevector1}, \\eqref{basicmodel:specialevector2}, and \\eqref{basicmodel:specialevector3}:\n\\begin{align}\n \\left|{\\bm u}_{\\bm s}^{(1)}\\right|^2 &= \\left(\\frac{b_1}{2a}\\right)^2+\\left(\\frac{b_2}{2a}\\right)^2=\\frac{|{\\bm b}|^2}{4a^2},\\label{basicmodel:specialnorm1}\\\\\n \\left|{\\bm u}_{\\bm s}^{(2)}\\right|^2 &= 1 \\geq 1 \\ \\text{and the last component of ${\\bm w}_{\\bm s}^{(2)}$ is not 1},\\label{basicmodel:specialnorm2}\\\\\n \\left|{\\bm u}_{\\bm s}^{(3)}\\right|^2 &= 1 \\geq 1 \\ \\text{and the last component of ${\\bm w}_{\\bm s}^{(3)}$ is not 1}.\\label{basicmodel:specialnorm3}\n\\end{align}\n% The detailed formulations of these 16 matrices and their associated eigenpairs are listed in Table \\ref{tab:2Dmat16general}. \nHowever, computing 16 eigenvalues may be too expensive and complex, and there exist $2^6=64$ cases if we extend \\eqref{16mat2D} to the three-dimensional case, which are impractical in application. \nOne relaxation approach is to divide $\\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ij}$ into two parts, corresponding to two one-dimensional cases that we have already solved. Note that\n\\begin{align*}\n \\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ij}&=\\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}\\in\\mathbb{R}^3,\\ \\Vert {\\bm z} \\Vert_2=1 \\atop {\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1} }\n \\Big\\{\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_x^+{\\bm z}\\right)\n +\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_x^-{\\bm z}\\right)\n +\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_y^+{\\bm z}\\right)\n +\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_y^-{\\bm z}\\right)\\Big\\}\\\\\n &\\leq \\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}\\in\\mathbb{R}^3,\\ \\Vert {\\bm z} \\Vert_2=1 \\atop {\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1} }\n \\Big\\{\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_x^+{\\bm z}\\right)\n +\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_x^-{\\bm z}\\right)\\Big\\}+\n \\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}\\in\\mathbb{R}^3,\\ \\Vert {\\bm z} \\Vert_2=1 \\atop {\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1} }\n \\Big\\{\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_y^+{\\bm z}\\right)\n +\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_y^-{\\bm z}\\right)\\Big\\}.\n\\end{align*}\nFor convenience, we denote\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ij}^{x}:=\\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}\\in\\mathbb{R}^3,\\ \\Vert {\\bm z} \\Vert_2=1,\\ {\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1} }\n \\Big\\{\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_x^+{\\bm z}\\right)\n +\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_x^-{\\bm z}\\right)\\Big\\}\n =\\max\\left\\{0,\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_x^+,\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_x^-,\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_x^*\\right\\},\n\\end{equation*}\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ij}^{y}:=\\max\\limits_{{\\bm z}\\in\\mathbb{R}^3,\\ \\Vert {\\bm z} \\Vert_2=1,\\ {\\|{\\bm u}_*\\|_2<1} }\n \\Big\\{\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_y^+{\\bm z}\\right)\n +\\max\\left(0,{\\bm z}^\\top \\widehat{A}_y^-{\\bm z}\\right)\\Big\\}\n =\\max\\left\\{0,\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_y^+,\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_y^-,\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_y^*\\right\\},\n\\end{equation*}\nwhere $\\lambda_s^+$, $\\lambda_s^-$, and $\\lambda_s^*$ represent the maximal eigenvalues of $\\widehat{A}_s^+$, $\\widehat{A}_s^-$, and $\\widehat{A}_s^++\\widehat{A}_s^-$ ($s=x$ or $y$), respectively. We then obtain the final relaxation formulation\n\\begin{equation} \\label{relax2D}\n \\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ij}^{\\mathcal{R}}:=\\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ij}^{x}+\\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ij}^{y}=\n \\max\\left\\{0,\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_x^+,\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_x^-,\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_x^*\\right\\}+\\max\\left\\{0,\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_y^+,\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_y^-,\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_y^*\\right\\},\n\\end{equation}\nwhich is significantly more efficient than \\eqref{16mat2D}.\n{Here $\\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}$ denotes the maximal denominator ratio in the optimization problem, not the limiter coefficient itself. Thus, for the relaxed 2D estimator, the corresponding cell-wise $q$-limiting factor is\n\\[\n\\mathcal{L}_{ij}^{q,\\mathcal R}:=\n\\begin{cases}\n1, & \\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ij}^{\\mathcal R}=0,\\\\[1mm]\n\\min\\left\\{1,\\dfrac{\\Delta x\\Delta y}{\\Delta t}\\left(\\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ij}^{\\mathcal R}\\right)^{-1}\\right\\}, & \\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ij}^{\\mathcal R}>0,\n\\end{cases}\n\\]\nwith the exact estimator obtained by replacing $\\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ij}^{\\mathcal R}$ by the full 16-matrix maximum in \\eqref{16mat2D}. The interface factors are then assigned by the usual adjacent-cell minimum, e.g., $\\theta^q_{i+1/2,j}=\\min\\{\\mathcal{L}_{ij}^{q},\\mathcal{L}_{i+1,j}^{q}\\}$ and analogously in the $y$ direction.}\n\\begin{remark}[On the relaxed multi-dimensional estimators]\\label{rem:relax-md}\nThe relaxed estimators \\eqref{relax2D} and \\eqref{relax3D} are \\emph{sufficient} for PCP enforcement.\nIndeed, they replace the exact maximization over all sign combinations by a sum of directional upper bounds, which yields a conservative underestimate of the exact admissible factor (and hence a more restrictive limiter).\nAs a result, the PCP proof remains valid, while the number of eigenvalue evaluations is substantially reduced; see Section~\\ref{sec:cost} {for the trade-off analysis of computational cost and numerical dissipation}.\n\\end{remark}\n\n\nFinally, we briefly explain how to implement our flux limiter in the three-dimensional RHD, which is very similar to the two-dimensional case, and only the different parts will be listed. \nThe FCT finite difference scheme for three-dimensional uniform rectangular meshes can be formulated by\n\\begin{equation}\\label{uLF3DRHD}\n {\\bf U}_{ijk}^{L} := {\\bf U}_{ijk}^n\n-\\frac{\\Delta t}{\\Delta x}\\left(\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+\\frac{1}{2},j,k}^L-\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i-\\frac{1}{2},j,k}^L\\right)\n-\\frac{\\Delta t}{\\Delta y}\\left(\\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}_{i,j+\\frac{1}{2},k}^L-\\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}_{i,j-\\frac{1}{2},k}^L\\right)\n-\\frac{\\Delta t}{\\Delta z}\\left(\\widehat{\\mathcal{H}}_{i,j,k+\\frac{1}{2}}^L-\\widehat{\\mathcal{H}}_{i,j,k-\\frac{1}{2}}^L\\right),\n\\end{equation}\n\\begin{align*}\n {\\bf U}_{ijk}^{n+1} = {\\bf U}_{ijk}^L\n &-\\frac{\\Delta t}{\\Delta x}\\left(\\theta_{i+\\frac{1}{2},j,k}\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i+\\frac{1}{2},j,k}^A-\\theta_{i-\\frac{1}{2},j,k}\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}_{i-\\frac{1}{2},j,k}^A\\right)\\\\\n &-\\frac{\\Delta t}{\\Delta y}\\left(\\theta_{i,j+\\frac{1}{2},k}\\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}_{i,j+\\frac{1}{2},k}^A-\\theta_{i,j-\\frac{1}{2},k}\\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}_{i,j-\\frac{1}{2},k}^A\\right)\n -\\frac{\\Delta t}{\\Delta z}\\left(\\theta_{i,j,k+\\frac{1}{2}}\\widehat{\\mathcal{H}}_{i,j,k+\\frac{1}{2}}^A-\\theta_{i,j,k-\\frac{1}{2}}\\widehat{\\mathcal{H}}_{i,j,k-\\frac{1}{2}}^A\\right),\n\\end{align*}\nwhere ${\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}}$, ${\\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}}$, and ${\\widehat{\\mathcal{H}}}$ represent the numerical fluxes in $x$, $y$, and $z$ direction, respectively. \nThe three-dimensional case can share the same framework as the two-dimensional one, except for the definitions of the following quantities related to the spatial dimension\n\\begin{align*}\n P^{-}_{ijk} &= \\Delta y\\Delta z\\left[\\min\\left(0, -\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^{A}_{i+\\frac{1}{2},j,k}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*\\right) + \\min\\left(0, \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^{A}_{i-\\frac{1}{2},j,k}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*\\right)\\right]\\\\\n &+\\Delta x\\Delta z\\left[\\min\\left(0, -\\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}^{A}_{i,j+\\frac{1}{2},k}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*\\right) + \\min\\left(0, \\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}^{A}_{i,j-\\frac{1}{2},k}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*\\right)\\right]\\\\\n &+\\Delta x\\Delta y\\left[\\min\\left(0, -\\widehat{\\mathcal{H}}^{A}_{i,j,k+\\frac{1}{2}}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*\\right) + \\min\\left(0, \\widehat{\\mathcal{H}}^{A}_{i,j,k-\\frac{1}{2}}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*\\right)\\right].\\\\\n Q^{-}_{ijk} &= \\frac{\\Delta x\\Delta y\\Delta z}{\\Delta t}\\left(\\epsilon - {\\bf U}^{L}_{ijk}\\cdot{\\bm n}_*\\right),\\quad {\\bf U}^{L}_{ijk}\\ \\text{is defined in }\\eqref{uLF3DRHD}.\\\\\n R^{-}_{ijk} &= \n \\begin{cases}\n \\min\\left(1, \\frac{Q^{-}_{ijk}}{P^{-}_{ijk}}\\right), & \\text{if}\\quad P^{-}_{ijk} < 0,\\\\\n 1,& \\text{otherwise}.\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{align*}\n\nThe formulations of the model matrix $\\widehat{A}_{\\bm s}$ and its associated eigenpairs share the same form as \\eqref{basicmodel}, \\eqref{basicmodel:evalue}, \\eqref{basicmodel:evector1}, \\eqref{basicmodel:evector2}, and \\eqref{basicmodel:evector3} but only differ in the size of ${\\bm b}$ and ${\\bm e}$. \n\\begin{equation*}\n \\widehat{A}_{\\bm s}=\n \\begin{pmatrix}\n \\frac{d}{a}\\mathcal{I}_{3\\times 3} & \\frac{d{\\bm b}-a{\\bm e}}{a\\sqrt{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}} \\\\\n \\frac{d{\\bm b}^\\top-a{\\bm e}^\\top}{a\\sqrt{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}} & \n \\frac{4a^2f-2a{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}+|{\\bm b}|^2d}{a(4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2)}\n \\end{pmatrix} =\n \\begin{pmatrix}\n \\frac{d}{a} & 0 & 0 & \\frac{b_1d-ae_1}{a\\sqrt{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}} \\\\\n 0 & \\frac{d}{a} & 0 & \\frac{b_2d-ae_2}{a\\sqrt{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}} \\\\\n 0 & 0 & \\frac{d}{a} & \\frac{b_3d-ae_3}{a\\sqrt{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}} \\\\\n \\frac{b_1d-ae_1}{a\\sqrt{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}} & \n \\frac{b_2d-ae_2}{a\\sqrt{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}} &\n \\frac{b_3d-ae_3}{a\\sqrt{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}} &\n \\frac{4a^2f-2a{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}+|{\\bm b}|^2d}{a(4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2)}\n \\end{pmatrix},\n\\end{equation*}\nwhere ${\\bm b}=(b_1,b_2,b_3)^\\top,\\ {\\bm e}=(e_1,e_2,e_3)^\\top.$\n\\begin{table}[t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{Summary of the cost of the $q$-limiter parameter estimation per cell. ``Exact'' refers to the estimator based on the full maximization in Lemma~\\ref{lem:RayleighQ}; ``relaxed'' refers to \\eqref{relax2D} in 2D and \\eqref{relax3D} in 3D. }\n \\label{tab:cost}\n \\begin{tabular}{cccc}\n \\toprule\n Dimension & matrix size & \\# eigenproblems (exact) & \\# eigenproblems (relaxed)\\\\\n \\midrule\n 1D & $2\\times2$ & $3$ & --\\\\\n 2D & $3\\times3$ & $16$ & $6$\\\\\n 3D & $4\\times4$ & $64$ & $9$\\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\nThere is one more repeated eigenvalue compared with \\eqref{basicmodel:evalue}:\n{\\begin{equation*}\n \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(k)} = \\frac{(-1)^{k-1}\\sigma_{\\bm s}+2af-{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}+2cd}{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2}\\ \\ (k=1,2),\\quad\n % \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(1)} = \\frac{\\sigma_{\\bm s}+2af-{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}+2cd}{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2},\\quad\n % \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(2)} = \\frac{-\\sigma_{\\bm s}+2af-{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}+2cd}{4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2},\\quad\n \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(3)} = \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bm s}^{(4)} = \\frac{d}{a},\n\\end{equation*}}\nwhere\n\\begin{align}\n &\\sigma_{\\bm s}:=\\sqrt{4\\Big((af-cd)^2-(af+cd)({\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e})+ac|{\\bm e}|^2+|{\\bm b}|^2df\\Big)-{|{\\bm b}\\times{\\bm e}|^2}},\\label{sigma3D}\\\\\n &{{\\bm b}\\times{\\bm e}=\\left(b_2e_3-b_3e_2,\\ b_3e_1-b_1e_3,\\ b_1e_2-b_2e_1\\right)^\\top.\\nonumber}\n\\end{align}\n{Similarly, the radicand of $\\sigma_{\\bm s}$ in \\eqref{sigma3D} is non-negative by the same block-structure argument. With $\\Delta:=4ac-|{\\bm b}|^2>0$, ${\\bm h}:=(d{\\bm b}-a{\\bm e})/(a\\sqrt{\\Delta})$, and $g:=(4a^2f-2a{\\bm b}\\cdot{\\bm e}+|{\\bm b}|^2d)/(a\\Delta)$, the $4\\times4$ matrix above has the repeated eigenvalue $d/a$ on the two-dimensional subspace orthogonal to ${\\bm h}$, while the two non-repeated eigenvalues are determined by the same real symmetric $2\\times2$ block with entries $d/a$, $\\|{\\bm h}\\|_2$, and $g$. Thus\n\\[\n\\sigma_{\\bm s}^2=\\frac{\\Delta^2}{4}\\left(\\left(g-\\frac{d}{a}\\right)^2+4\\|{\\bm h}\\|_2^2\\right)\\ge0,\n\\]\nwhich is equivalent to the radicand in \\eqref{sigma3D}. This guarantees the well-posedness of the 3D eigenvalue formulas.}\nThe associated eigenvectors are\n\\begin{align*}\n {\\bf w}_{\\bf s}^{(1)} &= \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{c-\\frac{|{\\bm b}|^2}{4a}}}\\left(\n \\frac{b_1}{2a}+\\frac{(b_1d-ae_1)\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bf s}^{(1)}}{2a\\|a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}\\|_2^2},\n \\frac{b_2}{2a}+\\frac{(b_2d-ae_2)\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bf s}^{(1)}}{2a\\|a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}\\|_2^2},\n \\frac{b_3}{2a}+\\frac{(b_3d-ae_3)\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bf s}^{(1)}}{2a\\|a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}\\|_2^2},\n 1\\right)^\\top,\\\\\n {\\bf w}_{\\bf s}^{(2)} &= \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{c-\\frac{|{\\bm b}|^2}{4a}}}\\left(\n \\frac{b_1}{2a}-\\frac{(b_1d-ae_1)\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bf s}^{(2)}}{2a\\|a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}\\|_2^2},\n \\frac{b_2}{2a}-\\frac{(b_2d-ae_2)\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bf s}^{(2)}}{2a\\|a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}\\|_2^2},\n \\frac{b_3}{2a}-\\frac{(b_3d-ae_3)\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bf s}^{(2)}}{2a\\|a{\\bm e}-d{\\bm b}\\|_2^2},\n 1\\right)^\\top,\\\\\n {\\bf w}_{\\bf s}^{(3)} &= \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{a}}\\left(-\\frac{b_2d-ae_2}{b_1d-ae_1},1,0,0\\right)^\\top,\\\\\n {\\bf w}_{\\bf s}^{(4)} &= \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{a}}\\left(-\\frac{b_3d-ae_3}{b_1d-ae_1},0,1,0\\right)^\\top,\n\\end{align*}\nwhere $\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bf s}^{(1)}$ and $\\widetilde{\\sigma}_{\\bf s}^{(2)}$ share the same definition in \\eqref{basicemodel:evec_sig}.\nThe judgment for the feasibility of eigenvectors and the special case of $\\widehat{A}_{\\bm s}$ are very similar to the two-dimensional case, and hence we omit them here.\n\nSince solving $2^6=64$ Rayleigh quotients is impractical, we suggest using the relaxation approach similar to \\eqref{relax2D}, which is also adopted and shown in the numerical results.\n\\begin{equation}\\label{relax3D}\n \\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ijk}^{\\mathcal{R}}:=\n \\sum_{s\\in\\{x,y,z\\}}\\max\\Bigl\\{0,\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bf s}^{+},\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bf s}^{-},\\ \\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bf s}^{*}\\Bigr\\},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bf s}^{+}$, $\\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bf s}^{-}$ and $\\widehat{\\lambda}_{\\bf s}^{*}$ denote the maximal eigenvalues of $\\widehat{A}_{\\bf s}^{+}$, $\\widehat{A}_{\\bf s}^{-}$ and $\\widehat{A}_{\\bf s}^{+}+\\widehat{A}_{\\bf s}^{-}$, respectively.\nThe relaxed estimator \\eqref{relax3D} reduces the number of eigenvalue evaluations from $2^6=64$ to $3\\times 3=9$ per cell, and the corresponding 3D cell-wise factor is obtained analogously as $\\mathcal{L}_{ijk}^{q,\\mathcal R}=1$ when $\\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ijk}^{\\mathcal R}=0$, and otherwise $\\mathcal{L}_{ijk}^{q,\\mathcal R}=\\min\\{1,(\\Delta x\\Delta y\\Delta z)/(\\Delta t\\,\\widehat{\\mathcal{L}}_{ijk}^{\\mathcal R})\\}$.\n\n\n\\subsection{Computational cost and implementation remarks}\\label{sec:cost}\nThe new estimator reduces the determination of the $q$-limiting factor to a small number of symmetric eigenvalue problems of size $(d{+}1)\\times(d{+}1)$.\nIn 1D, the maximization is reduced to three $2\\times2$ eigenvalue problems, and in 2D and 3D, the exact estimators require $2^4=16$ and $2^6=64$ eigenvalue evaluations per cell, respectively.\nThe relaxed variants \\eqref{relax2D} and \\eqref{relax3D} significantly reduce this number (see Table \\ref{tab:cost} for details) while remaining robust in all tests reported in Section~\\ref{Sec: Results}.\n\nIn addition, the symmetric matrices arising from the GQL parameterization have a special low-rank structure, and their maximal eigenvalues (and eigenvectors when needed) can be evaluated by closed-form formulas; see \\eqref{1Deig1}--\\eqref{1Deig2} in 1D and \\eqref{basicmodel:evalue} and \\eqref{basicmodel:evector1} in 2D/3D.\nThis avoids iterative root finding and makes the limiter well suited for large-scale simulations.\n\n{As noted in Remark~\\ref{rem:relax-md}, the relaxed estimators are conservative lower bounds on the exact limiting factor, which introduces a small amount of additional numerical dissipation in theory. However, extensive numerical benchmarks in Section~\\ref{Sec: Results} demonstrate that this dissipation is negligible or acceptable in practice. This minimal accuracy loss is more than offset by the dramatic reduction in computational cost. }\n\n\nThis completes the description of our PCP flux limiting framework. To facilitate reproducibility, \\ref{appendix:code} provides complete pseudocode, and Section \\ref{Sec: Results} lists all computational parameters, including grids, CFL numbers, final times, etc., used in the experiments. \n\n\n\n% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\\section{Numerical results} \\label{Sec: Results}\n\\setcounter{equation}{0}\n\n\\begin{table}[!thb] \n \\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.5}\n \\centering\n \\belowrulesep=0pt\n \\aboverulesep=0pt\n \\caption{Numerical errors and convergence rates in $\\rho$ at different grid resolutions.}\n \\label{table:Ex5.2.0}\n \\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{3mm}{\n \\begin{tabular}{c|cccccc}\n \\toprule[1.5pt]\n \\multirow{2}{*}{Flux limiter } &\n \\multirow{2}{*}{$N_x\\times N_y$} &\n \\multicolumn{2}{c}{$L^1$ norm} &\n \\multicolumn{2}{c}{$L^2$ norm}\\\\\n \\cmidrule(r){3-4} \\cmidrule(r){5-6}\n & & error & order & error & order\\\\ \n \\midrule[1.5pt]\n \\multirow{6}{*}{Without relaxation \\eqref{16mat2D}} & $8\\times8$ & 1.7455e-02 & -- & 1.8592e-02 & -- \\\\\n & $16\\times16$ & 8.6992e-04 & 4.3266 & 1.0609e-03 & 4.1313 \\\\\n & $32\\times32$ & 2.8496e-05 & 4.9320 & 3.3626e-05 & 4.9795 \\\\\n & $64\\times64$ & 8.6622e-07 & 5.0399 & 1.0034e-06 & 5.0667 \\\\\n & $128\\times128$ & 2.6647e-08 & 5.0227 & 3.0419e-08 & 5.0437 \\\\\n & $256\\times256$ & 8.3183e-10 & 5.0015 & 9.3642e-10 & 5.0217 \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\multirow{6}{*}{With relaxation \\eqref{relax2D}} & $8\\times8$ & 1.7455e-02 & -- & 1.8592e-02 & -- \\\\\n & $16\\times16$ & 8.6992e-04 & 4.3266 & 1.0609e-03 & 4.1313 \\\\\n & $32\\times32$ & 2.8496e-05 & 4.9320 & 3.3626e-05 & 4.9795 \\\\\n & $64\\times64$ & 8.6622e-07 & 5.0399 & 1.0034e-06 & 5.0667 \\\\\n & $128\\times128$ & 2.6647e-08 & 5.0227 & 3.0419e-08 & 5.0437 \\\\\n & $256\\times256$ & 8.3183e-10 & 5.0015 & 9.3642e-10 & 5.0217 \\\\\n \\bottomrule[1.5pt]\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n\\end{table}\n\nIn this section, we present a series of numerical experiments to validate the performance of {the proposed flux-limited high-order accurate method} for the one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D), and three-dimensional (3D) RHD. \nThe primary objective is to verify that the implemented flux limiter preserves the designed spatial accuracy when coupled with the classical fifth-order WENO (WENO5) reconstruction. This is examined using smooth problems where the formal convergence order can be measured. \nA key focus of the tests is to demonstrate the robustness granted by the flux limiter's ability to enforce the admissible states of the relativistic system. Several challenging benchmark problems, including strong shocks, ultra-relativistic Riemann problems, and multi-dimensional jets, are simulated. Without the limiting procedure, the standard WENO5 would break down due to the generation of nonphysical solutions. Furthermore, comparison results will be shown between our novel flux limiter and the {\\tt Wu-Tang} limiter \\cite{WuTang2015}. These experiments, therefore, underscore the necessity of the PCP mechanism and simultaneously assess the resolution in capturing complex wave structures. \nFor time integration, we employ the third-order strong-stability-preserving Runge--Kutta method.\nThe CFL number is set to 0.4, and the ideal equation of state \\eqref{ID-EOS} is used in all cases, with the adiabatic index set to $\\Gamma=5/3$, unless otherwise specified.\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.45\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{Smooth3D_N160_10isosurface.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{$t=10$.}\n % \\label{Fig_a:Ex6.2.0}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.45\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{Smooth3D_triangle-eps-converted-to.pdf}\n\t\t% \\caption{$t=20$.}\n % \\label{Fig_b:Ex6.2.0}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{Example \\ref{Ex5.2.0}: The numerical results obtained using WENO5 with the proposed PCP flux limiter. Left: 10 iso-surfaces of $\\rho$ equally spaced from 0 to 2; right: $l^1$, $l^2$, and $l^{\\infty}$ errors in $\\rho$ at different grid resolutions.}\\label{Fig:Ex6.2.0}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{example}[Accuracy test]\\label{Ex5.2.0}\nThis example tests a smooth sine wave propagating periodically in the domain $[0,1]^k$, $k=2,3$, aiming to investigate the accuracy of our proposed scheme in two and three dimensions. {In the algorithm implementation, we explore two strategies for handling the flux limiter parameters: a non-relaxed version \\eqref{16mat2D} and a relaxed version \\eqref{relax2D}.} \n{In all smooth-solution convergence tests, we follow the standard WENO accuracy-verification strategy of Jiang and Shu \\cite{jiang1996efficient}, also used in \\cite{zhang2012positivity, WuTang2015}. Although the SSP-RK3 time discretization is third-order accurate, the time step is deliberately reduced according to\n\\[\n\\Delta t=C\\left(\\sum_{\\ell=1}^k \\frac{1}{\\Delta x_\\ell}\\right)^{-p/q},\\qquad p=5,\\quad q=3,\n\\]\nwith $C=0.4$ and $k$ the space dimension of the smooth test. Therefore $O(\\Delta t^3)=O(h^5)$ on uniform grids, so the temporal error does not mask the fifth-order spatial convergence being measured.}\nFor the 2D case, the initial conditions are given by \n$$\n\\textbf{V}(x,y,0) = \\left(1+0.999\\ {\\rm sin}(2\\pi(x+y)),\\ 0.99/\\sqrt{2},\\ 0.99/\\sqrt{2},\\ 0.001\\right)^\\top,\n$$\nwith the exact solution of the rest-mass density \n\\begin{equation} \\label{exact2D}\n \\rho(x,y,t) = 1+0.999\\ {\\rm sin}\\left(2\\pi(x+y-0.99\\sqrt{2}t)\\right).\n\\end{equation}\nUniform grids are used with mesh size $\\Delta x=\\Delta y = \\frac{1}{N}$, where $N \\in \\{8,16,32,64,128,256\\}$.\nThe time step-size is chosen to match the spatial accuracy: $\\Delta t = {0.4}\\left({\\frac{1}{\\Delta x}+\\frac{1}{\\Delta y}}\\right)^{-\\frac{5}{3}}$. We report the $L^1$ and $L^2$ errors at $t = 0.1$ for the rest-mass density and corresponding orders obtained by the WENO5 scheme combined with flux limiters \\eqref{16mat2D} and \\eqref{relax2D} in Table \\ref{table:Ex5.2.0}. The results show that {the proposed scheme} achieves fifth-order accuracy, consistent with its theoretical order. In this smooth setting the physical constraints are not active, and the computed limiting factors stay very close to one, so the limiter does not degrade the design accuracy. \nFor the 3D case, the initial data are\n$$\n\\textbf{V}(x,y,z,0) = \\left(1+0.999\\ {\\rm sin}(2\\pi(x+y+z)),\\ 0.99/\\sqrt{3},\\ 0.99/\\sqrt{3},\\ 0.99/\\sqrt{3},\\ 0.001\\right)^\\top.\n$$\nThe exact solution of the rest-mass density is\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\rho(x,y,z,t) = 1+0.999\\ {\\rm sin}\\left(2\\pi(x+y+z-0.99\\sqrt{3}t)\\right).\n\\end{equation*}\n{Due to the complexity of directly computing and comparing 64 eigenvalues in 3D, only the relaxed version of the flux limiter is employed here. }\nTo investigate the spatial accuracy, we set the mesh size as $\\Delta x=\\Delta y=\\Delta z = \\frac{1}{N}$ with varying $N \\in \\{10,20,40,80,160\\}$.\nThe time step is set as $\\Delta t = {0.4}\\left({\\frac{1}{\\Delta x}+\\frac{1}{\\Delta y}+\\frac{1}{\\Delta z}}\\right)^{-\\frac{5}{3}}$. In Fig. \\ref{Fig:Ex6.2.0}, we present a 3D iso-surface plot of the rest-mass density using the numerical solution on a $160\\times160\\times160$ grid, and show the log-log graphs of the $L^1$, $L^2$, and $L^\\infty$ errors versus $N$ at $t = 0.1$. The slopes of all error lines are close to -5, indicating that the proposed scheme exhibits fifth-order spatial convergence in 3D case, which aligns with theoretical expectations.\n\\end{example}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{RCSrho1000_FL.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$\\rho$}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{RCSrho1000_FL_closeup.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{Close-up of $\\rho$}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{RCSvel1000_FL.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$v_1$}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{RCSpre1000_FL.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$p$}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{Example \\ref{Ex:RCS}: Numerical results for $\\rho,\\ v_1,\\ p$ obtained using WENO5 with the relaxed PCP flux limiter at $t = 0.45$. }\\label{Fig:ExRCS}\n\\end{figure}\n\n{\nFor discontinuous solutions such as Riemann problems, formal convergence order does not apply, and the error is concentrated in a narrow region around shocks and contact discontinuities. The primary goal of numerical methods for such problems is to produce sharp, non-oscillatory shock profiles while preserving physical constraints.\n}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{RCSrho1000_FL_limiter_xt.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{Example \\ref{Ex:RCS}} \\label{Fig:RCSLimiterMap}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ShockHeatrho200_FL_limiter_xt.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{Example \\ref{Ex:SH}} \\label{Fig:SHLimiterMap}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{Spatiotemporal distribution of the proposed flux limiter coefficient $\\theta(x,t)$ computed with WENO5. Activation regions align with shock discontinuities and track wave trajectories. The color scale represents the value of $\\theta_{i+1/2}$, ranging from 0 to 1. }\\label{Fig:1DLimiterActivation}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{example}{(1D Riemann problem)} \\label{Ex:RCS}\nWe simulate a demanding Riemann problem within the domain $[0,1]$.\nThe initial conditions are as follows:\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\textbf{V}(x,0)=\n \\begin{cases}\n (1,0,10^{4})^\\top,& x<0.5,\\\\\n (1,0,10^{-8})^\\top,& x>0.5.\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{equation*}\nThe outflow boundary conditions are applied.\nThe solution at final time $t=0.45$ develops a strong leftward rarefaction, a rightward contact discontinuity, and a rightward shock. The latter two waves propagate at velocities exceedingly close to the speed of light (approximately 0.986956 and 0.9963757), rendering the simulation highly challenging. A key difficulty lies in resolving the extremely narrow region between the contact discontinuity and the shock front, which has a theoretical width of about $4.2\\times10^{-3}$ at $t = 0.45$.\n% The wave structure of this problem is akin to that of Example \\ref{Ex5.1.2}. \nFig. \\ref{Fig:ExRCS} compares the numerical solutions obtained using our proposed GQL-based flux limiter against the iterative limiter of Wu and Tang \\cite{WuTang2015}. While both methods preserve positivity, the proposed scheme (circles) exhibits visibly sharper resolution of the contact discontinuity and the shock front compared to the {\\tt Wu-Tang} limiter (squares). This improvement is attributed to the exact determination of the locally optimal limiting parameter, avoiding the over-dissipation.\n{\nTo further quantify the performance of the proposed flux limiter and analyze its activation behavior, Fig. \\ref{Fig:RCSLimiterMap} shows the spatiotemporal distribution of the flux limiter coefficient $\\theta(x,t)$, which is consistent with the wave structure.\n}\n\\end{example}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ShockHeatrho200_FL.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$\\rho$}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ShockHeatrho200_FL_closeup.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{Close-up of $\\rho$}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ShockHeatvel200_FL.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$v_1$}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ShockHeatpre200_FL.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$p$}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{Example \\ref{Ex:SH}: Numerical results for $\\rho,\\ v_1,\\ p$ obtained using WENO5 or AiWENO5-Z with the proposed PCP flux limiter at $t = 2$. }\\label{Fig:ExSH}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{example}{(Shock heating problem)}\\label{Ex:SH}\nWe consider a shock heating test in this example. The initial data are prescribed as\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\textbf{V}(x,0)=\n (1,1-10^{-10},{10^{-4}}/{3})^\\top,\\quad 0<x<1.\n\\end{equation*}\nAt $x = 1$, a reflective boundary condition is imposed, while the left boundary $x=0$ allows free inflow.\nPhysically, this setup describes a cold, ultra-relativistic gas stream moving to the right toward a fixed wall. Upon impact, the kinetic energy is converted into thermal energy, resulting in strong compression and the formation of a left-propagating shock. The shock speed can be derived analytically as $v_s=\\frac{(\\Gamma-1)W_0|v_0|}{W_0+1}$, where $\\Gamma=4/3$, $v_0=1-10^{-10}$, and $W_0=(1-v_0^2)^{-1/2}\\approx70710.675$. Behind the shock, the gas is at rest and attains a specific internal energy of $W_0-1$.\n\n{To demonstrate the generality of the proposed limiter, we also incorporate our GQL-based flux limiter into the fifth-order Ai-WENO-Z scheme (AiWENO5-Z) \\cite{wang2022affine}.} Fig. \\ref{Fig:ExSH} presents the profiles of rest-mass density $\\rho$, velocity $v_1$, and pressure $p$ at $t=2$ computed by {either WENO5 or AiWENO5-Z} with our flux limiter on a mesh of 200 uniform cells. The exact solution is provided for reference. It is noteworthy that without the flux limiter, {both the finite difference WENO5 and AiWENO5-Z scheme would produce non-physical solutions and break down during the simulation. The AiWENO5-Z solution exhibits higher resolution near the shock as expected. We also provide pointwise error plots in Fig. \\ref{Fig:ExSH_error}, which implies that the error is concentrated in a narrow region around the shock, consistent with WENO's accuracy behavior.} {The tiny oscillations are visible immediately behind the reflected shock, which are also observed in \\cite{WuTang2015}. Critically, this behavior is not unique to our flux limiter, but rather a general property of high-order shock-capturing methods.} Although a slight wall-heating phenomenon persists near the reflective boundary $x=1$, the overall solution exhibits excellent stability and high resolution.\n{\nFig. \\ref{Fig:SHLimiterMap} presents the spatiotemporal distribution of $\\theta(x,t)$ for the shock heating problem. {In this problem, the flux limiter $\\theta$ takes values of 0 or 1 in nearly the entire domain, and intermediate values only exist in an extremely narrow band right at the shock front.} The activation region forms a straight line that exactly coincides with the trajectory of the left-propagating reflected shock wave, demonstrating the limiter's precise shock-tracking capability.\n}\n\\end{example}\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ShockHeatrho200_FL_PointError.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{Error plot for $\\rho$}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ShockHeatpre200_FL_PointError.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{Error plot for $p$}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{Example \\ref{Ex:SH}: Plots of error between numerical and exact solution $u-u_{\\tt ex}$ at $t = 2$ obtained by WENO5 or AiWENO5-Z with the proposed PCP flux limiter. }\\label{Fig:ExSH_error}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\n\\begin{example}{(2D Riemann problems).}\\label{Ex5.2.5}\nIn this example, we simulate two challenging 2D Riemann problems to verify the robustness and bound-preserving property of our flux limiter. The computational domain is set to $[0,1]^2$ with outflow boundary conditions imposed on all boundaries. The maximum fluid velocity in both problems is close to the speed of light, presenting significant challenges for numerical simulation. We employ a uniform mesh with $400\\times400$ cells to assess the performance of WENO5, using the PCP limiter with the estimator \\eqref{16mat2D} and its relaxed variant \\eqref{relax2D}. \n\nThe initial conditions for the two 2D Riemann problems are given by \n\\begin{equation*}\n \\textbf{V}(x,y,0) = \n \\begin{cases}\n (0.1, 0, 0, 20)^\\top, & x>0.5,\\ y>0.5,\\\\\n (0.00414329639576, 0.9946418833556542, 0, 0.05)^\\top, & x<0.5,\\ y>0.5,\\\\\n (0.01, 0, 0, 0.05)^\\top, & x<0.5,\\ y<0.5,\\\\\n (0.00414329639576, 0, 0.9946418833556542, 0.05)^\\top, & \\text{otherwise},\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{equation*} \nand\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\textbf{V}(x,y,0) = \n \\begin{cases}\n (0.1, 0, 0, 0.01)^\\top & x>0.5,\\ y>0.5,\\\\\n (0.1, 0.99, 0, 1)^\\top & x<0.5,\\ y>0.5,\\\\\n (0.5, 0, 0, 1)^\\top & x<0.5,\\ y<0.5,\\\\\n (0.1, 0, 0.99, 1)^\\top &\\text{otherwise}.\n \\end{cases}\n\\end{equation*}\nFig. \\ref{Fig:2D_RP4} and Fig. \\ref{Fig:2D_RP5} display the logarithmic rest-mass density $\\ln\\rho$ at $t = 0.4$ for the first and second Riemann problems, respectively. \n{The proposed scheme} captures the intricate structures, including the sharp jet-like spike, the curved shocks, and the finely resolved mushroom cloud with high resolution. In both simulations, the solution remains strictly within the physical bounds, demonstrating that the present method maintains high resolution while preserving stability and physical constraints. To see the advantages in the resolution of complex wave structures, we further show the results of the rest-mass density, obtained by WENO5 with both proposed PCP flux limiters and the {\\tt Wu-Tang} one, over several 1D lines (see Fig. \\ref{Fig:2D_RP4_1Dline}), or plot the global minimum of $\\theta_{i,j}$ in each step over time (see Fig. \\ref{Fig:2D_RP_FLalpha}). These plots validate the high resolution of our proposed PCP flux limiter. {The mild oscillations visible near the shock in Fig. \\ref{Fig:2D_RP4_1Dline_a} are inherent to the WENO5 reconstruction on this coarse grid and remain bounded; crucially, they do not violate any physical admissibility constraint.}\n\n{\nTo quantify the difference between the exact and relaxed implementations of the proposed flux limiter, Fig.~\\ref{Fig:2D_RP45_cmp} shows the natural logarithm of the absolute pointwise density difference, i.e., the logarithm $\\log(|\\rho_{\\text{\\tt ex}}-\\rho_{\\text{\\tt re}}|)$, where $\\rho_{\\text{\\tt ex}}$ and $\\rho_{\\text{\\tt re}}$ denote the results obtained with the exact limiter \\eqref{16mat2D} and the relaxed limiter \\eqref{relax2D}, respectively. The comparison demonstrates that the differences are extremely small:}\n{\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item For the first 2D Riemann problem, the maximum pointwise difference is approximately $3.3290 \\times 10^{-5}$, and the average difference is approximately $2.5839 \\times 10^{-8}$.\n \\item For the second 2D Riemann problem, the maximum pointwise difference is approximately $4.4900 \\times 10^{-5}$, and the average difference is approximately $3.0354 \\times 10^{-8}$.\n\\end{itemize}\nThese differences are orders of magnitude smaller than the solution amplitude, confirming that the relaxed flux limiter does not introduce excessive or unnecessary numerical dissipation, while providing dramatic computational savings.\n}\n\\end{example}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\linewidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=0.95\\textwidth]{RP4_rho_FL_16-eps-converted-to.pdf}\n\t\t\\caption{$\\log \\rho$, flux limiter \\eqref{16mat2D}.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\linewidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=0.95\\textwidth]{RP4_rho_FL_Relax-eps-converted-to.pdf}\n\t\t\\caption{$\\log \\rho$, flux limiter \\eqref{relax2D}.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\linewidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=0.95\\textwidth]{RP4_rho_2015Wu-eps-converted-to.pdf}\n\t\t\\caption{$\\log \\rho$, {\\tt Wu-Tang} flux limiter.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{First 2D Riemann problem in Example \\ref{Ex5.2.5}: The contours of $\\log\\rho$ at $t = 0.4$ obtained by WENO5 {with different flux limiters.} 25 equally spaced contour lines from -8 to -2.3 are displayed.}\\label{Fig:2D_RP4}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\linewidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=0.95\\textwidth]{RP4_1Dxplusy06_cmp.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$\\rho$ along $x+y=0.6$.}\\label{Fig:2D_RP4_1Dline_a}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\linewidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=0.95\\textwidth]{RP4_1Dxplusy067_cmp.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$\\rho$ along $x+y=0.67$.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\linewidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=0.95\\textwidth]{RP4_1Dxeqy_cmp.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$\\rho$ along $x=y$.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\linewidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=0.95\\textwidth]{RP4_1Dyeq02_cmp.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$\\rho$ along $y=0.2$.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{Same as Fig. \\ref{Fig:2D_RP4} except for $\\rho$ along different lines.}\\label{Fig:2D_RP4_1Dline}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\linewidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=0.95\\textwidth]{RP5_rho_FL_16-eps-converted-to.pdf}\n\t\t\\caption{$\\log \\rho$, flux limiter \\eqref{16mat2D}.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\linewidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=0.95\\textwidth]{RP5_rho_FL_Relax-eps-converted-to.pdf}\n\t\t\\caption{$\\log \\rho$, flux limiter \\eqref{relax2D}.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\linewidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=0.95\\textwidth]{RP5_rho_2015Wu-eps-converted-to.pdf}\n\t\t\\caption{$\\log \\rho$, {\\tt Wu-Tang} flux limiter.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{Second 2D Riemann problem in Example \\ref{Ex5.2.5}: The contours of $\\log\\rho$ at $t = 0.4$ obtained by WENO5 {with different flux limiters.} 25 equally spaced contour lines from -6 to 1.9 are displayed.}\\label{Fig:2D_RP5}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\linewidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{RP4_FLalpha_cmp.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{First 2D Riemann problem.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\linewidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{RP5_FLalpha_cmp.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{Second 2D Riemann problem.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{Example \\ref{Ex5.2.5}: Comparison of $\\min\\limits_{i,j}\\left\\{\\theta_{i+1/2,j},\\ \\theta_{i,j+1/2}\\right\\}$ between different flux limiters over time. }\\label{Fig:2D_RP_FLalpha}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\linewidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=0.95\\textwidth]{RP4_rho_FL_diff.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{{Error logarithm for first 2D Riemann problem.}}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\linewidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=0.95\\textwidth]{RP5_rho_FL_diff.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{{Error logarithm for second 2D Riemann problem.}}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{{Example \\ref{Ex5.2.5}: Contours of the logarithm $\\log(|\\rho_{\\text{\\tt ex}}-\\rho_{\\text{\\tt re}}|)$ at $t=0.4$ obtained by WENO5, where $\\rho_{\\text{\\tt ex}}$ and $\\rho_{\\text{\\tt re}}$ denote the density computed with the exact and relaxed flux limiters, respectively. 25 equally spaced contour levels are displayed.}}\\label{Fig:2D_RP45_cmp}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\n\\begin{example}{(Shock-Vortex interaction problem)} \\label{EX:SV}\nThis example examines the interaction between a shock wave and a vortex, a problem previously studied in \\cite{duan2019high,chen2022physical}. \nThe initial condition is given by\n\\begin{gather*}\n \\mathbf{V}(x,y,0) = \n \\begin{cases}\n \\mathbf{V}_{\\rm L}, & x < -6, \\\\[5pt]\n \\mathbf{V}_{\\rm vortex}, & x \\ge -6,\n \\end{cases}\n \\qquad{\\rm with}\\\\\n \\mathbf{V}_{\\rm L}=\\Big(4.891497310766981,-0.388882958251919,0,11.894863258311670\\Big)^\\top,\\\\\n \\mathbf{V}_{\\rm vortex}=\\left(\n \\left(\\hat{\\theta}(x,y)\\right)^\\frac{1}{\\Gamma-1},\n \\frac{w_1(x,y)-v_c}{1-v_c \\, w_1(x,y)},\n \\frac{\\sqrt{1-v_c^2}\\ w_2(x,y)}{1-v_c \\, w_1(x,y)},\n \\left(\\hat{\\theta}(x,y)\\right)^\\frac{\\Gamma}{\\Gamma-1}\n \\right)^\\top,\n\\end{gather*}\nwhere the functions $\\hat{\\theta}$, $w_1$, and $w_2$ are given by\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\hat{\\theta}(x,y) = 1-\\frac{{\\varepsilon_{\\rm vtx}^2}}{28\\pi^2} \\, \\mathrm{e}^{1-\\frac{x^2}{1-v_c^2}-y^2}, ~ \n w_1(x,y) = -y \\hat{f}(x,y), \n ~ \n w_2(x,y) = \\frac{x}{\\sqrt{1-v_c^2}}\\hat{f}(x,y),\n\\end{equation*}\nwith\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\hat{f}(x,y) = \\sqrt{\\frac{\\beta}{1+\\beta\\left(\\frac{x^2}{1-v_c^2}+y^2\\right)}},\\quad\n \\beta = \\frac{\\frac{{\\varepsilon_{\\rm vtx}^2}}{10\\pi^2}\\ \\mathrm{e}^{1-\\frac{x^2}{1-v_c^2}-y^2}}{1.8-\\frac{{\\varepsilon_{\\rm vtx}^2}}{20\\pi^2}\\ \\mathrm{e}^{1-\\frac{x^2}{1-v_c^2}-y^2}}.\n\\end{equation*}\nThis setup ensures that\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\lim_{x\\rightarrow -6^-} \\mathbf{V}(x,y,0) = \\mathbf{V}_{\\rm L}, \n \\quad\n \\lim_{x\\rightarrow -6^+} \\mathbf{V}(x,y,0) \n \\approx \n \\left(1,-0.9, 0, 1\\right)^\\top,\n % =:\\mathbf{V}_{\\rm R},\n\\end{equation*}\nwhich represents a stationary shock at $x = -6$. On the right side of the shock, an initially centered vortex at $(0,0)$ moves leftward with a speed of $v_c=0.9$. To demonstrate the robustness of our flux limiter, we investigate a challenging case with a vortex strength set to ${\\varepsilon_{\\rm vtx}=10.0828}$.\n% % This initial condition is deduced by following the analytical method proposed in \\cite{duan2022analytical}. \nThe computational domain is $[-17,3] \\times [-5,5]$ with reflective boundary conditions at $y = \\pm5$, inflow at $x=3$, and outflow at $x=-17$. We solve this problem up to $t = 19$ using WENO5 with both versions of our flux limiter \\eqref{16mat2D} and \\eqref{relax2D} on a uniform grid with $\\Delta x = \\Delta y = 1/40$. \nThe contour plots of $\\log_{10}(1+|\\nabla \\rho|)$ are presented in Fig. \\ref{Fig:2D_SV}. \nAs the vortex interacts with the stationary shock wave, intricate wave structures emerge. {The WENO5 scheme, incorporating either our flux limiter \\eqref{16mat2D} or \\eqref{relax2D}}, effectively captures these wave patterns. \n{\nThe difference between the two implementations of our flux limiter, approximately $6.77\\times10^{-4}$ in $l^{\\infty}$ norm, is much smaller than the solution amplitude, demonstrating the accuracy of the relaxed limiter \\eqref{relax2D}.\n}\n\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{SV_FL_16_closeup.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{With flux limiter \\eqref{16mat2D}.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{SV_FL_Relax_closeup.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{With flux limiter \\eqref{relax2D}.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{Example \\ref{EX:SV}: Contour plots of ${\\rm log}_{10}(1+|\\nabla \\rho|)$ at $t = 19$, obtained using WENO5.}\\label{Fig:2D_SV}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\end{example}\n\n\n\n\n\\begin{example}{(2D Relativistic jets)} \\label{EX:jet}\n\tRelativistic jets are frequently observed in astrophysical phenomena such as active galactic nuclei. Due to the potential development of complex flow features, including strong relativistic shocks, shear layers, and interface instabilities, numerical simulations for relativistic jets are extremely challenging.\n\t\n\tWe examine three configurations of the pressure-matched, highly supersonic jet model with increasingly extreme relativistic characteristics. The initial states of the ambient flow are defined as:\n\t\\begin{align}\n\t\t{\\bf V}_1(x,y,0) &= \\left(1,0,0,2.3536240721718810\\times10^{-5}\\right)^\\top,\\label{j1}\\\\\n\t\t{\\bf V}_2(x,y,0) &= \\left(1,0,0,2.3966375079777595\\times10^{-5}\\right)^\\top,\\label{j2}\\\\\n\t\t{\\bf V}_3(x,y,0) &= \\left(1,0,0,2.3995344183272123\\times10^{-7}\\right)^\\top.\\label{j3}\n\t\\end{align}\n\tA jet beam with rest-mass density $\\rho^b=0.1$ is injected through the bottom boundary inlet $\\{y=0,\\ |x|\\leq0.5\\}$. The jet moves in the $y$-direction with velocity $v^b$ while its pressure matches the ambient value. The specific settings for the jet beams corresponding to the ambient flows \\eqref{j1}, \\eqref{j2}, and \\eqref{j3} are:\n\n \\vspace{3mm}\n\t\t(i) $v^b = 0.99$, $M_b = 50$ ($\\gamma^b\\approx7.09$, $M_r\\approx354.37$);\n \n \\vspace{3mm}\n\t\t(ii) $v^b = 0.999$, $M_b = 50$ ($\\gamma^b\\approx22.37$, $M_r\\approx1118.09$);\n \n \\vspace{3mm}\n\t\t(iii) $v^b = 0.9999$, $M_b = 500$ ($\\gamma^b\\approx70.71$, $M_r\\approx35356.15$).\n \n \\vspace{3mm}\n \n\tHere, the classical beam Mach number is $M_b=v^b/c_s$, and the relativistic Mach number is $M_r=M_b\\gamma^b/\\gamma^s$, where $\\gamma^b$ and $\\gamma^s$ are the Lorentz factors for the jet speed and local sound speed, respectively.\n\tThe computational domain $[0,12]\\times[0,25]$ is discretized into $240\\times500$ uniform cells. Reflective boundary conditions are enforced at $x=0$, a fixed jet beam inflow is imposed on the nozzle $\\{y=0,\\ 0\\leq x\\leq0.5\\}$, and outflow conditions are applied elsewhere.\n\n {\n\tFigs.~\\ref{Fig:2D_Jet_lnrho} and~\\ref{Fig:2D_Jet_lnpre} present schlieren images of the logarithmic rest-mass density and pressure for the three configurations, computed using both the exact flux limiter \\eqref{16mat2D} (top rows), and the pointwise logarithmic absolute difference between the exact \\eqref{16mat2D} and relaxed \\eqref{relax2D} limiters (bottom rows). The solutions obtained with the two limiters are visually indistinguishable, with the average pointwise density and pressure differences both below $10^{-5}$\n across all three configurations.} These regimes, particularly the third case with $\\gamma^b \\approx 70.71$, are notoriously prone to numerical breakdown due to the rapid generation of negative pressure or density during transient evolution. We observe that the standard finite difference WENO5 scheme fails almost immediately without the PCP limiting procedure. In contrast, our GQL-based limiter successfully stabilizes the simulation even at $M_b=500$. All computed solutions exhibit well-resolved flow structures, with the leading Mach shock and the Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities along the shear layer captured with high resolution. These results confirm that the proposed scheme combines strict physical robustness with excellent shock-capturing capabilities in handling complex, ultra-relativistic jet dynamics.\n\\end{example}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ColdJet_v099_rho_FL_16.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{{No Relax} flux limiter.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ColdJet_v0999_rho_FL_16.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{{No Relax} flux limiter.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ColdJet_v09999_rho_FL_16.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{{No Relax} flux limiter.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ColdJet_v099_rho_FL_diff.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{the relaxed PCP flux limiter.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ColdJet_v0999_rho_FL_diff.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{the relaxed PCP flux limiter.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ColdJet_v09999_rho_FL_diff.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{the relaxed PCP flux limiter.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{Example \\ref{EX:jet}: Top: Schlieren images of $\\ln\\rho$ obtained using WENO5 with our flux limiter \\eqref{16mat2D}; bottom: contours of the logarithm $\\log(|\\rho_{\\text{\\tt ex}}-\\rho_{\\text{\\tt re}}|)$, where $\\rho_{\\text{\\tt ex}}$ and $\\rho_{\\text{\\tt re}}$ denote the density computed with the exact and relaxed flux limiters, respectively. 25 equally spaced contour levels from -11.5 to -0.5 are displayed. From left to right: configurations (i) at $t=30$, (ii) at $t=25$, and (iii) at $t=23$.}\\label{Fig:2D_Jet_lnrho}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ColdJet_v099_pre_FL_16.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{{No Relax} flux limiter.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ColdJet_v0999_pre_FL_16.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{{No Relax} flux limiter.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ColdJet_v09999_pre_FL_16.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{{No Relax} flux limiter.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ColdJet_v099_pre_FL_diff.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{the relaxed PCP flux limiter.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ColdJet_v0999_pre_FL_diff.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{the relaxed PCP flux limiter.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{ColdJet_v09999_pre_FL_diff.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{the relaxed PCP flux limiter.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{Example \\ref{EX:jet}: Top: Schlieren images of $\\ln p$ obtained using WENO5 with our flux limiter \\eqref{16mat2D}; bottom: contours of the logarithm $\\log(|p_{\\text{\\tt ex}}-p_{\\text{\\tt re}}|)$, where $p_{\\text{\\tt ex}}$ and $p_{\\text{\\tt re}}$ denote the pressure computed with the exact and relaxed flux limiters, respectively. 25 equally spaced contour levels from -11.5 to -1.2 are displayed. From left to right: configurations (i) at $t=30$, (ii) at $t=25$, and (iii) at $t=23$.}\\label{Fig:2D_Jet_lnpre}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\n\\begin{example}{(2D Axisymmetric relativistic jets)} \\label{EX:Axisjet}\nThis test considers an axisymmetric relativistic jet simulation in cylindrical coordinates $(r,z)$. Compared with the rectangular coordinates $(x,y)$, the RHD equations in $(r,z)$ coordinates\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\frac{\\partial{\\bf U}}{\\partial t}+\\frac{\\partial{\\bf F}_1({\\bf U})}{\\partial r}+\\frac{\\partial {\\bf F}_2({\\bf U})}{\\partial z} = {\\bf S}({\\bf U}, r),\n\\end{equation*}\nare different by the source term\n\\begin{equation*}\n {\\bf S}({\\bf U}, r) = -\\frac{1}{r}\\left(Dv_1,m_1v_1,m_2v_1,m_1\\right)^\\top.\n\\end{equation*}\nIn the case of rectangular coordinates, we have ${\\bf U}_{ij}+\\Delta t\\mathscr{L}({\\bf U}_{ij})\\in\\mathcal{G}$ by enforcing our flux limiter. When transforming into cylindrical coordinates, we should update ${\\bf U}_{ij}+\\Delta t\\left(\\mathscr{L}({\\bf U}_{ij})+{\\bf S}({\\bf U}_{ij}, r_i)\\right)$ in each time step. To analyze the possible extra PCP condition caused by the source term, we rewrite\n\\begin{equation*}\n {\\bf U}_{ij}+\\Delta t\\left(\\mathscr{L}({\\bf U}_{ij})+{\\bf S}({\\bf U}_{ij}, r_i)\\right)\n = (1-\\beta)\\left({\\bf U}_{ij}+\\frac{\\Delta t}{1-\\beta}\\mathscr{L}({\\bf U}_{ij})\\right)\n + \\beta \\left({\\bf U}_{ij}+\\frac{\\Delta t}{\\beta}{\\bf S}({\\bf U}_{ij}, r_i)\\right),\\quad \\beta \\in (0,1).\n\\end{equation*}\nIt is sufficient to ensure that ${\\bf U}_{ij}+\\frac{\\Delta t}{1-\\beta}\\mathscr{L}({\\bf U}_{ij})\\in\\mathcal{G}$ and ${\\bf U}_{ij}+\\frac{\\Delta t}{\\beta}{\\bf S}({\\bf U}_{ij}, r_i)\\in\\mathcal{G}$ when ${\\bf U}_{ij}\\in\\mathcal{G}$ for all $i,j$. The first part ${\\bf U}_{ij}+\\frac{\\Delta t}{1-\\beta}\\mathscr{L}({\\bf U}_{ij})\\in\\mathcal{G}$ can be achieved by enforcing our flux limiter after replacing $\\Delta t$ in ${Q}_{ij}^-:=\\frac{\\Delta x\\Delta y}{\\Delta t}$ by $\\frac{\\Delta t}{1-\\beta}$. The second part is true if \n\\begin{equation}\\label{source:beta}\n \\Delta t \\leq \\beta A_s,\\quad\n A_s:=\\min\\limits_{\\{i,j\\}\\in\\mathcal{P}_v}\\left\\{\\frac{i\\Delta r\\ q({\\bf U}_{ij})}{\\left(p({\\bf U}_{ij})+q({\\bf U}_{ij})\\right)\\left|v_1({\\bf U}_{ij})\\right|}\\right\\},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mathcal{P}_v=\\{(i,j):\\ i,j\\in\\mathbb{Z},\\ v_1({\\bf U}_{ij}) > 0\\}$.\n\nWe adopt the pressure-matched, highly supersonic C2 jet model, also referred to as the cold jet. Initially, the computational domain $[0,15]\\times[0,45]$ is filled with the ambient medium, whose state is set as\n\\begin{equation*}\n {\\bf V}(r,z,0) = \\left(1,0,0,1.70304823218172071\\times10^{-4}\\right)^\\top.\n\\end{equation*}\nThe settings of boundary conditions are the same as those in Example \\ref{EX:jet} except for two minor differences. The rest-mass density and the injected velocity of the jet beam are $\\rho^b=0.01$ and $v^b=0.99$ in this cold jet model, and the nozzle on the bottom boundary $y=0$ is changed into $\\{z=0,\\ r\\leq1\\}$. The beam Mach number is $M_b=6$, corresponding to a relativistic Mach number $M_r\\approx41.95$. \n\n{\nThe left panel of Fig. \\ref{Fig:2D_AxisJet2} shows the schlieren images of the logarithmic rest-mass density obtained with exact flux limiter \\eqref{16mat2D} within the symmetric domain $[-15,15]\\times[0,45]$ at $t = 100$ on a uniform $360\\times1080$ mesh. }\nThe simulation employs WENO5 coupled with both versions of our flux limiter \\eqref{16mat2D} and \\eqref{relax2D}, in which the source terms are specially treated by setting $\\beta = 0.1$ in \\eqref{source:beta} to maintain solution admissibility. The results clearly show the bow shock at the jet head, large-scale vortex structures generated by Kelvin--Helmholtz instabilities, and the resulting turbulent mixing region. These morphological features align well with results reported in \\cite{2006Zhang, chen2022physical, WuTang2015}, which were obtained using adaptive mesh refinement RHD codes or high-order positivity-preserving WENO methods. \n{\nThe right panel of Fig. \\ref{Fig:2D_AxisJet2} shows the pointwise logarithmic absolute difference between the exact \\eqref{16mat2D} and relaxed \\eqref{relax2D} limiters.\nQuantitatively, the maximum absolute difference of rest-mass density between the exact and relaxed limiters reaches 1.727, occurring on the symmetry axis $x=0$, where the leading bow shock is located; the corresponding density values from the exact and relaxed schemes are 2.6583 and 4.3853, respectively. For pressure, the maximum absolute difference is 0.1284, also concentrated on the symmetry axis, with the exact and relaxed values being 0.1454 and 0.0169 at the peak point. This deviation pattern is physically reasonable: the relaxed limiter introduces a small amount of extra dissipation as a conservative guarantee of the PCP property, and this effect accumulates most prominently in the high-gradient bow shock region where the limiter is activated most frequently. The average absolute differences are approximately $7.861\\times10^{-3}$ for density and $2.321\\times10^{-4}$ for pressure, both orders of magnitude smaller than the local peak. Therefore, the minor accuracy loss is overall acceptable when both limiters strictly enforce the physical admissibility constraints across the entire domain.\n}\n\n{\nFig.~\\ref{Fig:2D_AxisJet2_LimiterPercent} presents the limiter activation frequency maps at two representative time instants, $t=20$ and $t=100$. {For comparison, we adopt a higher-contrast colormap and unify the colorbar range for both subfigures.} The color scale represents the proportion of time steps during which the limiter was activated at each cell, i.e., the fraction of time steps where one of the four limiter coefficients $\\theta_{i\\pm1/2,j}$ and $\\theta_{i,j\\pm1/2}$ is strictly less than $1$. Temporally, the maximum activation frequency decreases from 27.5\\% at the early stage to 19.95\\% at $t=100$, with denser contours in the early phase. This arises as transient sharp shocks during initial jet penetration challenge WENO5 reconstruction, while mature turbulent structures are better resolved with fewer spurious oscillations. Spatially, {the activation pattern matches the flow structures well: the highest frequency concentrates on the symmetry axis where flow conditions are most demanding, and periodic stripes correspond to the Kelvin–Helmholtz vortices along the shear layer. This confirms that the limiter activates locally and adaptively with strong flow features.} \n}\n\n\\end{example}\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n \t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=0.96\\textwidth]{AxisJet2_rho_FL_16_Nx360T100_beta01.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{{No Relax} flux limiter, $\\beta = 0.1$.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=0.96\\textwidth]{AxisJet2_rho_FL_16_Nx360T100_beta01_diff.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{the relaxed PCP flux limiter, $\\beta = 0.1$.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{Example \\ref{EX:Axisjet}: Left: Schlieren images of $\\ln\\rho$ obtained using WENO5 with our flux limiter \\eqref{16mat2D} at $t = 100$; bottom: Schlieren images of the logarithm $\\log(|\\rho_{\\text{\\tt ex}}-\\rho_{\\text{\\tt re}}|)$ at $t = 100$, where $\\rho_{\\text{\\tt ex}}$ and $\\rho_{\\text{\\tt re}}$ denote the density computed with the exact and relaxed flux limiters, respectively.}\\label{Fig:2D_AxisJet2}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n \t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=0.96\\textwidth]{AxisJet2_rho_FL_Relax_Nx360T20_limiterPercent.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{$\\beta = 0.1$}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=0.96\\textwidth]{AxisJet2_rho_FL_Relax_Nx360T100_limiterPercent.jpg}\n\t\t% \\caption{the relaxed PCP flux limiter, $\\beta = 0.1$.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{Example \\ref{EX:Axisjet}: Limiter activation frequency maps. Left: $t=20$; right: $t=100$. Both subfigures share a unified color scale for cross-time comparison, and activation patterns align with the key flow structures. The color scale represents the proportion of time steps during which the limiter was activated at each cell (zero means that the limiter is not activated).}\\label{Fig:2D_AxisJet2_LimiterPercent}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\n\\begin{example}[3D Shock-bubble interaction problems]\\label{Ex:SB}\nThe next 3D example simulates the shock-bubble interaction problem within the computational domain $[0,325]\\times[0,90]\\times[0,90]$. Reflective boundary conditions are applied at $y=0$, $y=90$, $z=0$, and $z=90$, inflow boundary conditions at $x=325$, and outflow boundary conditions at $x=0$. \n% The setups are similar to those in \\cite{he2012adaptive1}, but with a different EOS, namely, the RC-EOS \\eqref{hEOS1} is used in our setups. \nThe left and right states of the shock are initialized as follows:\n% &Case\\ 3:\n\\begin{equation*}\n \\mathbf{V}(x,y,z,0) = \n \\begin{cases}\n {(1, 0, 0, 0, 0.05)^\\top}& x<265,\\\\\n {(1.865225080631180,-0.196781107378299, 0, 0, 0.15)^\\top}& x>265. \n \\end{cases}\n\\end{equation*}\nThe state of the bubble differs from that in {the numerical RHD study} \\cite{duan2021entropy}: \n\\begin{equation*}\n \\textbf{V}(x,y,z,0) = {(0.01358, 0, 0, 0, 0.05)^\\top},\\quad\\quad\\quad\\sqrt{(x-215)^2+(y-45)^2+(z-45)^2}\\leq 25.\n\\end{equation*}\nThe density of the bubble is specifically adjusted to construct a demanding scenario, which imposes strict requirements on the numerical scheme, making the adoption of our proposed flux limiter indispensable for achieving stable and accurate simulations. \n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n \t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{RHD_shockbb3259090_Light_1c_density_2Dxy.jpg}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.48\\textwidth}\n \t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{RHD_shockbb3259090_Light_1c_density_2Dxz.jpg}\n \\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{Example \\ref{Ex:SB}: Schlieren images of $\\rho$ at $t=90,180,270,360,450$ (from top to bottom). Left: on the slice {$z=45$}; right: on the slice {$y=45$}. The two orthogonal slices jointly demonstrate the rotational symmetry of the 3D flow field.}\\label{Fig:2D_shockbb_2Dslice}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n\t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{SB2Nx325_3D10isosurface_T270_noAxis.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$t = 270$.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{SB2Nx325_3D10isosurface_T360_noAxis.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$t = 360$.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \t\\begin{subfigure}[t]{.32\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{SB2Nx325_3D10isosurface_T450_noAxis.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$t = 450$.}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{Example \\ref{Ex:SB}: 10 iso-surfaces of $\\rho$ equally spaced from 0.55 to 1.75, obtained using WENO5 with the relaxed PCP flux limiter \\eqref{relax3D}.}\\label{Fig:3D_SB_rho}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\nTo comprehensively visualize the interaction between the shock and the bubble, Fig. \\ref{Fig:2D_shockbb_2Dslice} presents the schlieren images of the rest-mass density $\\rho$ at $t=90,180,270,360,450$ on the mid-plane slices {$y=45$ and $z=45$}. \n{\nThe two orthogonal mid-plane slices complement each other: they capture the shock-bubble interaction dynamics from different viewing angles and provide intuitive evidence that the numerical scheme well preserves the rotational symmetry of the initial configuration.\n}\nMeanwhile, Fig. \\ref{Fig:3D_SB_rho} displays the 3D iso-surfaces of $\\rho$ at three later time instants ($t = 270,\\ 360,\\ 450$), consisting of 10 equally spaced iso-values ranging from 0.55 to 1.75. The 3D visualization intuitively depicts the complete three-dimensional dynamic process of the shock-bubble interaction, capturing the spatial morphology of the bubble deformation, shock propagation, and mutual interaction with high fidelity. \nAll numerical solutions are obtained using WENO5 with our flux limiter on $325\\times90\\times90$ uniform grids. As demonstrated by both the 2D schlieren images and 3D iso-surface plots, our scheme effectively captures the dynamics of the interaction between the left-moving shock and the bubble.\n\\end{example}\n\n\n\\begin{example}{(3D Axisymmetric relativistic jets)}\\label{EX:Axisjet3D}\nThis 3D example is based on the pressure-matched hot A1 model in the 2D case. The adiabatic index $\\Gamma = 4/3$. The computational domain is $[0,7]\\times[0,7]\\times[0,50]$, which is initially filled with uniform static gas with the state\n\\begin{equation*}\n {\\bf V}(x,y,z,0) = \\left(1,0,0,0,0.40611878453038897\\right)^\\top.\n\\end{equation*}\nThrough the bottom boundary circular region $\\{z=0,\\ \\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\\leq1\\}$, a light jet beam with the state $$(\\rho^b,v_1^b,v_2^b,v_3^b,p^b) = (0.01,0,0,0.99,0.40611878453038897)$$ is injected parallel to the $z$-axis. The boundary conditions are specified in a manner very similar to the 2D case. The fixed jet beam inflow is imposed on $\\{z=0,\\ \\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\\leq1\\}$, reflective conditions are applied on planes $x = 0$ and $y = 0$, and outflow conditions are specified on the remaining boundaries.\n\n{Note that the computational domain for this simulation is $[0,7]\\times[0,7]\\times[0,50]$, which covers one quadrant of the full axisymmetric domain. For the visualization in Fig.~\\ref{Fig:3D_AxisJet1_FL_Relax_yhalf}, we mirror the computed solution exactly across the $x=0$ symmetry plane to display the symmetric half-domain $[-7,7]\\times[0,7]\\times[0,50]$; this post-processing does not alter the numerical solution.} {Fig. \\ref{Fig:3D_AxisJet1_FL_Relax_yhalf_density_T20}, \\ref{Fig:3D_AxisJet1_FL_Relax_yhalf_density_T40}, and \\ref{Fig:3D_AxisJet1_FL_Relax_yhalf_density_T60} present} 15 iso-surfaces of $\\ln\\rho$ in the symmetric region $[-7,7]\\times[0,7]\\times[0,50]$ at $t = 20,\\ 40$, and 60, using a uniform $70\\times70\\times500$ mesh. {The corresponding velocity fields are visualized in Fig. \\ref{Fig:3D_AxisJet1_FL_Relax_yhalf_vel_T20}, \\ref{Fig:3D_AxisJet1_FL_Relax_yhalf_vel_T40}, and \\ref{Fig:3D_AxisJet1_FL_Relax_yhalf_vel_T60},} where the arrow direction indicates velocity direction and the arrow scale is proportional to velocity magnitude. The results demonstrate the accurate capture of the time evolution of a light, relativistic jet with high internal energy, and confirm the PCP capability of the proposed flux limiter.\n\\end{example}\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[!htb]\n\t\\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.16\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{RHD_3DAxisJetA1_yhalfdensity_T20.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$t=20$.}\\label{Fig:3D_AxisJet1_FL_Relax_yhalf_density_T20}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.16\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{RHD_3DAxisJetA1_yhalfdensity_T40.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$t=40$.}\\label{Fig:3D_AxisJet1_FL_Relax_yhalf_density_T40}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.16\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{RHD_3DAxisJetA1_yhalfdensity_T60.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$t=60$.}\\label{Fig:3D_AxisJet1_FL_Relax_yhalf_density_T60}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.16\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{velocity_field_Ite2.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$t=20$.}\\label{Fig:3D_AxisJet1_FL_Relax_yhalf_vel_T20}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.16\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{velocity_field_Ite4.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$t=40$.}\\label{Fig:3D_AxisJet1_FL_Relax_yhalf_vel_T40}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}[t]{.16\\textwidth}\n\t\t\\centering\n\t\t\\includegraphics[width=1\\textwidth]{velocity_field_Ite6.jpg}\n\t\t\\caption{$t=60$.}\\label{Fig:3D_AxisJet1_FL_Relax_yhalf_vel_T60}\n\t\\end{subfigure}\n\t\\caption{Example \\ref{EX:Axisjet3D}: Numerical results obtained using WENO5 with the relaxed PCP flux limiter \\eqref{relax3D}. Left three subfigures: 15 iso-surfaces of $\\ln\\rho$ equally spaced from -5 to 1; right three subfigures: Slope field visualization of the velocity ${\\bm v}$.}\\label{Fig:3D_AxisJet1_FL_Relax_yhalf}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\n% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\n\n\\section{Conclusions}\\label{sec:conclusion}\nWe have developed a robust and efficient physical-constraint-preserving (PCP) flux-limiting framework for high-order schemes, exemplified by finite-difference WENO methods, for special relativistic hydrodynamics. The admissible state set in conservative variables is strictly enforced through the equivalent conditions $D>0$ and $q({\\bf{U}})=E-\\sqrt{D^2+|{\\bm m}|^2}>0$, corresponding to positive rest-mass density, positive pressure, and subluminal velocity.\n\nThe central idea is to leverage the geometric quasilinearization (GQL) characterization, which represents the nonlinear constraint $q({\\bf{U}})>0$ exactly as the intersection of linear half-space inequalities ${\\bf{U}}\\cdot{\\bm{n}}_*({\\bm{v}}_*)>0$ for all auxiliary variables ${\\bm{v}}_*\\in \\mathbb{B}_1({\\bf 0})$. This formulation allows us to embed the RHD constraints into a scalar-style Zalesak-type FCT limiter: by projecting the flux-corrected update onto the relevant normals, the constraint enforcement reduces to lower-bound limiting of scalar quantities while the limiter operates directly on conservative variables.\n\nA critical innovation is the {explicit, non-iterative determination} of the limiting parameters via a rational stereographic parameterization of the GQL normal vector. This technique transforms the required worst-case minimization over auxiliary variables into a generalized Rayleigh-quotient formulation, allowing the optimal parameters to be obtained by solving small symmetric eigenvalue problems ($2\\times2$ in 1D; $(d+1)\\times(d+1)$ in $d$ dimensions). In multidimensions, relaxed variants further reduce the number of eigenvalue evaluations while preserving a rigorous PCP guarantee. Consequently, the proposed parameter estimator avoids expensive iterative searches over ${\\bm{v}}_*$ and replaces them with {closed-form} eigenvalue evaluations, resulting in a lightweight limiter suitable for large-scale multidimensional simulations.\n\nExtensive numerical experiments in one to three space dimensions confirm that the resulting schemes robustly enforce physical admissibility, retain fifth-order accuracy for smooth solutions, and sharply resolve strong discontinuities. Future work will focus on less restrictive (yet still explicit) estimators for the $q$-limiting factor, extensions to curvilinear or unstructured meshes and more general equations of state, and applications of the GQL--FCT strategy to other hyperbolic systems with nonlinear invariant domains.\n\n\n\n% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\\section*{Data availability}\nThe data and code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.\n\n\\section*{Declaration of competing interest}\nThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.\n\n% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\\section*{Acknowledgement}\nThis work was partially supported by Science Challenge Project (No.~TZ2025007) and the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Grant Nos.~JCYJ20250604144300001 and RCJC20221008092757098).\n% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\n% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n{\n\\appendix\n\\section{Complete Pseudocode for the proposed PCP flux Limiter}\\label{appendix:code}\n\nIn this appendix, we provide complete pseudocode for our physical-constraint-preserving flux-limiting framework. All notation matches the main text.\n\n\\subsection{Notation Summary}\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item ${\\bf U}^n$: Conservative state at time $t^n$\n \\item $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^H$: High-order WENO5 numerical flux\n \\item $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^L$: Low-order global Lax-Friedrichs (Rusanov) flux\n \\item $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^A = \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^H - \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^L$: Anti-diffusive flux\n \\item $\\Delta x, \\Delta y, \\Delta z, \\Delta t$: Mesh size and time step\n \\item $\\alpha$: Global maximum wave speed\n % \\item $\\epsilon_{\\text{PCP}} = \\min(10^{-13}, D(U^L), q(U^L))$: PCP tolerance\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\subsection{Main Algorithm: PCP flux Limiter}\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Algorithm A.1} \\textit{GQL-Based PCP Flux-Limiting Framework (1D/2D/3D)}\n\n\\medskip\n\\noindent\\textbf{Input:} Conservative state ${\\bf U}^n$, high-order flux $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^H$, low-order flux $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^L$, mesh parameters $\\Delta x, \\Delta y, \\Delta z$, time step $\\Delta t$, CFL number\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Output:} Updated state ${\\bf U}^{n+1}$ satisfying ${\\bf U}^{n+1} \\in \\mathcal{G}_\\epsilon$\n\n\\medskip\n\\begin{enumerate}\n \\item \\textbf{Step 1: Compute low-order update (guaranteed to be admissible)}\n \n Compute low-order state ${\\bf U}^L$ using first-order LF flux:\n \\[\n {\\bf U}^L = {\\bf U}^n - \\frac{\\Delta t}{\\Delta x} \\left( \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^L_{i+1/2,j,k} - \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^L_{i-1/2,j,k} \\right) - \\frac{\\Delta t}{\\Delta y} \\left( \\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}^L_{i,j+1/2,k} - \\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}^L_{i,j-1/2,k} \\right) - \\frac{\\Delta t}{\\Delta z} \\left( \\widehat{\\mathcal{H}}^L_{i,j,k+1/2} - \\widehat{\\mathcal{H}}^L_{i,j,k-1/2} \\right)\n \\]\n (For 1D, omit $y,z$ terms; for 2D, omit $z$ term.)\n\n \\item \\textbf{Step 2: Compute anti-diffusive flux}\n \n $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^A_{i+1/2} \\leftarrow \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^H_{i+1/2} - \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^L_{i+1/2}$\n \n (Similarly for $\\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}^A, \\widehat{\\mathcal{H}}^A$ in 2D/3D.)\n\n \\item \\textbf{Step 3: Compute density limiter $\\theta^D$ (enforces $D \\geq \\epsilon$)}\n \n \\begin{enumerate}\n \\item For each cell $i$ (and $j,k$ in 2D/3D):\n \\begin{itemize}\n \\item $\\epsilon_D \\leftarrow \\min(10^{-13}, D({\\bf U}^L_i))$\n \\item Compute $P^-_i, Q^-_i, R^-_i$ using Zalesak's notation with ${\\bm n}_D = (1, 0, \\dots, 0)^\\top$\n \\end{itemize}\n \n \\item For each interface $i+1/2$:\n \\begin{itemize}\n \\item If $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^A_{i+1/2} \\cdot {\\bm n}_D \\geq 0$: $\\theta^D_{i+1/2} \\leftarrow R^-_i$\n \\item Else: $\\theta^D_{i+1/2} \\leftarrow R^-_{i+1}$\n \\end{itemize}\n \\end{enumerate}\n (Similarly for $y,z$ directions in 2D/3D.)\n\n \\item \\textbf{Step 4: Compute q-limiter $\\theta^q$ (enforces $q(U) \\geq \\epsilon$)}\n \n \\begin{itemize}\n \\item If dimension == 1: $\\theta^q \\leftarrow \\texttt{Compute1DLimiter}({\\bf U}^L, \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^A, \\Delta x, \\Delta t)$\n \\item Else: $\\theta^q \\leftarrow \\texttt{ComputeRelaxedLimiter}({\\bf U}^L, \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^A, \\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}^A, \\widehat{\\mathcal{H}}^A, \\Delta x, \\Delta y, \\Delta z, \\Delta t)$\n \\end{itemize}\n\n \\item \\textbf{Step 5: Apply final limiter and update state}\n \n \\begin{itemize}\n \\item For each interface: $\\theta_{i+1/2} \\leftarrow \\min(\\theta^D_{i+1/2}, \\theta^q_{i+1/2})$\n \\item Compute flux-corrected update:\n \\[\n {\\bf U}^{n+1} = {\\bf U}^L - \\frac{\\Delta t}{\\Delta x} \\left( \\theta_{i+1/2} \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^A_{i+1/2} - \\theta_{i-1/2} \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^A_{i-1/2} \\right)\n \\]\n \\end{itemize}\n\\end{enumerate}\n\n\\medskip\n\\noindent\\textbf{Return:} ${\\bf U}^{n+1}$\n\n\\medskip\n\\subsection{Subroutine: Exact 1D q-Limiter}\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Algorithm A.2} \\textit{Compute1DLimiter(${\\bf U}^L, \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^A, \\Delta x, \\Delta t$)}\n\n% \\medskip\n\\noindent\\textbf{Input:} Low-order state ${\\bf U}^L$, anti-diffusive flux $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^A$, mesh parameters\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Output:} q-limiter $\\theta^q$\n\n\\medskip\n\\begin{enumerate}\n \\item For each cell $i$:\n \\begin{enumerate}\n \\item \\textbf{Step 1: Extract coefficients }\n \n ${\\bf U}^L_i = (D^L, m^L, E^L)^\\top$\n \n $\\epsilon_q \\leftarrow \\min(10^{-13}, q({\\bf U}^L_i))$\n \n $a \\leftarrow E^L + D^L - \\epsilon_q$, $b \\leftarrow 2m^L$, $c \\leftarrow E^L - D^L - \\epsilon_q$\n \n $d^\\pm \\leftarrow \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^A_{i\\pm1/2} \\cdot (1, 0, 1)^\\top$, $e^\\pm \\leftarrow 2\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^A_{i\\pm1/2} \\cdot (0, 1, 0)^\\top$, $f^\\pm \\leftarrow \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^A_{i\\pm1/2} \\cdot (-1, 0, 1)^\\top$\n\n \\item \\textbf{Step 2: Rational stereographic parameterization and Rayleigh quotient}\n \n Define symmetric matrices:\n \\[\n B = \\begin{pmatrix} a & -b/2 \\\\ -b/2 & c \\end{pmatrix}, \\quad {A^\\star={\\tt sign}(\\star)\\begin{pmatrix} d^\\star & -e^\\star/2 \\\\ -e^\\star/2 & f^\\star \\end{pmatrix},\\quad \\star\\in\\{+,-\\}}\n \\]\n {Here ${\\tt sign}(+)=1$ and ${\\tt sign}(-)=-1$.}\n \n Compute Cholesky decomposition $B = R^\\top R$\n \n ${\\widetilde{A}^\\star \\leftarrow R^{-\\top} A^\\star R^{-1},\\quad \\star\\in\\{+,-\\}}$\n\n \\item \\textbf{Step 3: Compute maximal eigenvalues}\n \n $\\lambda^+_{\\text{max}} \\leftarrow \\texttt{MaxEigenvalue}(\\widetilde{A}^+)$\n \n $\\lambda^-_{\\text{max}} \\leftarrow \\texttt{MaxEigenvalue}(\\widetilde{A}^-)$\n \n $\\lambda^*_{\\text{max}} \\leftarrow \\texttt{MaxEigenvalue}(\\widetilde{A}^+ + \\widetilde{A}^-)$\n\n \\item \\textbf{Step 4: Check feasibility of eigenvectors ($|u_*| < 1$)}\n \n For each eigenvalue $\\lambda$:\n \\begin{itemize}\n \\item Compute the corresponding eigenvector $z$\n \\item ${\\bm w} \\leftarrow R^{-1} {\\bm z}$\n \\item {If the last component of ${\\bm w}$ is nonzero, set $u_* \\leftarrow w_1/w_2$; otherwise mark this eigenvector as infeasible}\n \\item If $|u_*| \\geq 1$: Reject this eigenvalue (infeasible)\n \\end{itemize}\n\n \\item \\textbf{Step 5: Compute cell-wise limiting factor}\n \n {$M_i \\leftarrow \\max(0, \\lambda^+_{\\text{max, feasible}}, \\lambda^-_{\\text{max, feasible}}, \\lambda^*_{\\text{max, feasible}},\\text{ boundary candidates})$}\n \n {$\\mathcal{L}_i \\leftarrow 1$ if $M_i=0$; otherwise $\\mathcal{L}_i\\leftarrow \\min\\left\\{1,\\dfrac{\\Delta x}{\\Delta t\\,M_i}\\right\\}$.}\n \\end{enumerate}\n\n \\item \\textbf{Step 6: Compute interface limiting factors}\n \n For each interface $i+1/2$: $\\theta^q_{i+1/2} \\leftarrow \\min(\\mathcal{L}_i, \\mathcal{L}_{i+1})$\n\\end{enumerate}\n\n\\medskip\n\\noindent\\textbf{Return:} $\\theta^q$\n\n\\medskip\n\\subsection{Subroutine: Relaxed 2D/3D q-Limiter}\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Algorithm A.3} \\textit{ComputeRelaxedLimiter(${\\bf U}^L, \\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^A, \\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}^A, \\widehat{\\mathcal{H}}^A, \\Delta x, \\Delta y, \\Delta z, \\Delta t$)}\n\n\\medskip\n\\noindent\\textbf{Input:} Low-order state ${\\bf U}^L$, anti-diffusive fluxes in all directions, mesh parameters\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Output:} Relaxed q-limiter $\\theta^q$\n\n{\\noindent\\textbf{Note:} \\texttt{ComputeDirectionalDenominator} returns the weighted maximal denominator estimate in \\eqref{relax2D} or \\eqref{relax3D}; the conversion to the actual limiter coefficient is performed only after summing the directional denominator estimates.}\n\n\\medskip\n\\begin{enumerate}\n \\item For each cell $i,j,k$:\n % \\begin{enumerate}\n \n {\\textbf{Step 1: Extract coefficients for each spatial direction}}\n \n Extract $(a, {\\bm b}, c)$ from ${\\bf U}^L_{ijk}$ (vector ${\\bm b}$ for momentum)\n \n Extract $(d^\\pm_x, {\\bm e}^\\pm_x, f^\\pm_x)$ from $\\widehat{\\mathcal{F}}^A_{i\\pm1/2,j,k}$\n \n Extract $(d^\\pm_y, {\\bm e}^\\pm_y, f^\\pm_y)$ from $\\widehat{\\mathcal{G}}^A_{i,j\\pm1/2,k}$\n \n If dimension == 3:\n \\begin{itemize}\n \\item Extract $(d^\\pm_z, {\\bm e}^\\pm_z, f^\\pm_z)$ from $\\widehat{\\mathcal{H}}^A_{i,j,k\\pm1/2}$\n \\item {$M^x_{ijk} \\leftarrow \\texttt{ComputeDirectionalDenominator}(a, {\\bm b}, c, d^\\pm_x, {\\bm e}^\\pm_x, f^\\pm_x, \\Delta y \\Delta z)$}\n \\item {$M^y_{ijk} \\leftarrow \\texttt{ComputeDirectionalDenominator}(a, {\\bm b}, c, d^\\pm_y, {\\bm e}^\\pm_y, f^\\pm_y, \\Delta x \\Delta z)$}\n \\item {$M^z_{ijk} \\leftarrow \\texttt{ComputeDirectionalDenominator}(a, {\\bm b}, c, d^\\pm_z, {\\bm e}^\\pm_z, f^\\pm_z, \\Delta x \\Delta y)$}\n \\item {$M_{ijk} \\leftarrow M^x_{ijk} + M^y_{ijk} + M^z_{ijk}$}\n \\item {$\\mathcal{L}_{ijk}\\leftarrow 1$ if $M_{ijk}=0$; otherwise $\\mathcal{L}_{ijk}\\leftarrow\\min\\left\\{1,\\dfrac{\\Delta x\\Delta y\\Delta z}{\\Delta t\\,M_{ijk}}\\right\\}$}\n \\end{itemize}\n Else:\n \\begin{itemize}\n \\item {$M^x_{ij} \\leftarrow \\texttt{ComputeDirectionalDenominator}(a, {\\bm b}, c, d^\\pm_x, {\\bm e}^\\pm_x, f^\\pm_x, \\Delta y)$}\n \\item {$M^y_{ij} \\leftarrow \\texttt{ComputeDirectionalDenominator}(a, {\\bm b}, c, d^\\pm_y, {\\bm e}^\\pm_y, f^\\pm_y, \\Delta x)$}\n \\item {$M_{ij} \\leftarrow M^x_{ij} + M^y_{ij}$}\n \\item {$\\mathcal{L}_{ij}\\leftarrow 1$ if $M_{ij}=0$; otherwise $\\mathcal{L}_{ij}\\leftarrow\\min\\left\\{1,\\dfrac{\\Delta x\\Delta y}{\\Delta t\\,M_{ij}}\\right\\}$}\n \\end{itemize}\n % \\end{enumerate}\n\n \\item \\textbf{Step 2: Compute interface limiting factors}\n \n For each interface: $\\theta^q \\leftarrow \\min(\\mathcal{L}_{\\text{left}}, \\mathcal{L}_{\\text{right}})$\n\\end{enumerate}\n\n\\medskip\n\\noindent\\textbf{Return:} $\\theta^q$\n\n\\medskip\n% \\clearpage\n\\subsection{Auxiliary Function: Maximal Eigenvalue}\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Algorithm A.4} \\textit{MaxEigenvalue($A$)}\n\n\\medskip\n\\noindent\\textbf{Input:} Symmetric matrix $A$ (size 2x2, 3x3, or 4x4)\n\n\\noindent\\textbf{Output:} Maximal eigenvalue $\\lambda_{\\text{max}}$\n\n\\medskip\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item Compute eigenvalues using the explicit formulae from the main text\n \\item $\\lambda_{\\text{max}} \\leftarrow \\text{maximum of all eigenvalues}$\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\medskip\n\\noindent\\textbf{Return:} $\\lambda_{\\text{max}}$\n}\n\n% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\\bibliographystyle{abbrv}\n\\bibliography{references}\n \n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: references.bib\n================================================\n@article{wang2022affine,\n title={{Affine-invariant WENO weights and operator}},\n author={Wang, Bao-Shan and Don, Wai Sun},\n journal={Applied Numerical Mathematics},\n volume={181},\n pages={630--646},\n year={2022},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{peng2025oedg,\n title = {{OEDG}: Oscillation-eliminating discontinuous {Galerkin} method for hyperbolic conservation laws},\n author = {Peng, Manting and Sun, Zheng and Wu, Kailiang},\n journal = {Mathematics of Computation},\n volume = {94},\n number = {353},\n pages = {1147--1198},\n year = {2025},\n doi = {10.1090/mcom/3998},\n eprint = {2310.04807},\n archivePrefix = {arXiv},\n primaryClass = {math.NA}\n}\n\n\n@article{borges2008improved,\n title={An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws},\n author={Borges, Rafael and Carmona, Monique and Costa, Bruno and Don, Wai Sun},\n journal={Journal of computational physics},\n volume={227},\n number={6},\n pages={3191--3211},\n year={2008},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{wu2017design,\n title={Design of provably physical-constraint-preserving methods for general relativistic hydrodynamics},\n author={Wu, Kailiang},\n journal={Phys. Rev. D},\n volume={95},\n number={10},\n pages={103001},\n year={2017},\n publisher={APS}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{abgrall2024bound,\n title={{Bound preserving Point-Average-Moment PolynomiAl-interpreted (PAMPA)} scheme: one-dimensional case},\n author={Abgrall, R{\\'e}mi and Jiao, Miaosen and Liu, Yongle and Wu, Kailiang},\n journal={Commun. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={39},\n number={5},\n pages={29--58},\n year={2026},\n publisher={Cambridge University Press}\n}\n\n@article{abgrall2025bound,\n title={{Bound preserving Point-Average-Moment PolynomiAl-interpreted (PAMPA) on polygonal meshes}},\n author={Abgrall, R{\\'e}mi and Liu, Yongle and Boscheri, Walter},\n journal={},\n year={2025},\n note={\\href{https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10069}{https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10069}}\n}\n\n@article{abgrall2025novel,\n title={A novel and simple invariant-domain-preserving framework for {PAMPA scheme: 1D} case},\n author={Abgrall, R{\\'e}mi and Jiao, Miaosen and Liu, Yongle and Wu, Kailiang},\n journal={SIAM J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={47},\n number={6},\n pages={A3536--A3565},\n year={2025},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@article{cui2025local,\n title={On Local Minimum Entropy Principle of High-Order Schemes for Relativistic {E}uler Equations},\n author={Cui, Shumo and Wu, Kailiang and Xu, Linfeng},\n journal={Math. Comp. },\n volume={in press},\n year={2025},\n note={\\href{https://doi.org/10.1090/mcom/4139}{https://doi.org/10.1090/mcom/4139}} \n}\n\n@article{liu1994weighted,\n title={Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes},\n author={Liu, Xu-Dong and Osher, Stanley and Chan, Tony},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={115},\n number={1},\n pages={200--212},\n year={1994},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{jiang1996efficient,\n title={Efficient implementation of weighted {ENO} schemes},\n author={Jiang, Guang-Shan and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={126},\n number={1},\n pages={202--228},\n year={1996},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{zalesak1979fully,\n title={Fully multidimensional flux-corrected transport algorithms for fluids},\n author={Zalesak, Steven T},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={31},\n number={3},\n pages={335--362},\n year={1979},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{zalesak1981very,\n title={Very high order and pseudospectral flux-corrected transport {(FCT)} algorithms for conservation laws},\n author={Zalesak, Steven T},\n booktitle={Proceedings of the Fourth IMACS International Symposium on Computer Methods for Partial Differential Equations},\n pages={126},\n year={1981},\n organization={IMACS, Rutgers University New Brunswick}\n}\n\n@article{zalesak1987preliminary,\n title={A preliminary comparison of modern shock-capturing schemes: linear advection},\n author={Zalesak, ST},\n journal={Advances in Computer Methods for PDEs. Publ. IMACS},\n pages={15--22},\n year={1987}\n}\n\n@incollection{zalesak2005design,\n title={The design of {Flux-Corrected Transport (FCT)} algorithms for structured grids},\n author={Zalesak, Steven T},\n booktitle={Flux-corrected transport: Principles, algorithms, and applications},\n pages={29--78},\n year={2005},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@book{zalesak2012design,\n title={The design of {Flux-Corrected Transport} ({FCT}) algorithms for structured grids},\n author={Zalesak, Steven T},\n year={2012},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@book{kuzmin2012flux,\n title={Flux-corrected transport: principles, algorithms, and applications},\n author={Kuzmin, Dmitri and L{\\\"o}hner, Rainald and Turek, Stefan},\n year={2012},\n publisher={Springer Science \\& Business Media}\n}\n\n@article{wilson1972numerical,\n title={{Numerical study of fluid flow in a Kerr space}},\n author={Wilson, James R},\n journal={Astrophys. J.},\n volume={173},\n pages={431},\n year={1972}\n}\n\n@article{may1966hydrodynamic,\n title={Hydrodynamic calculations of general-relativistic collapse},\n author={May, Michael M and White, Richard H},\n journal={Phys. Rev.},\n volume={141},\n number={4},\n pages={1232},\n year={1966},\n publisher={APS}\n}\n\n@article{tchekhovskoy2007wham,\n\ttitle={{WHAM: a WENO-based general relativistic numerical scheme--I. Hydrodynamics}},\n\tauthor={Tchekhovskoy, Alexander and McKinney, Jonathan C and Narayan, Ramesh},\n\tjournal={Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.},\n\tvolume={379},\n\tnumber={2},\n\tpages={469--497},\n\tyear={2007},\n\tpublisher={Blackwell Publishing Ltd Oxford, UK}\n}\n\n@article{chen2021second,\n\ttitle={Second-order accurate {BGK} schemes for the special relativistic hydrodynamics with the {S}ynge equation of state},\n\tauthor={Chen, Yaping and Kuang, Yangyu and Tang, Huazhong},\n\tjournal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n\tvolume = {442},\n\tpages={110438},\n\tyear={2021},\n\tpublisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{dolezal1995,\n\ttitle={Relativistic hydrodynamics and essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes},\n\tauthor={Dolezal, A and Wong, SSM},\n\tjournal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n\tvolume={120},\n\tnumber={2},\n\tpages={266--277},\n\tyear={1995},\n\tpublisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{del2002efficient,\n\ttitle={{An efficient shock-capturing central-type scheme for multidimensional relativistic flows-I. Hydrodynamics}},\n\tauthor={Del Zanna, Luca and Bucciantini, Niccolo},\n\tjournal={Astron. Astrophys.},\n\tvolume={390},\n\tnumber={3},\n\tpages={1177--1186},\n\tyear={2002},\n\tpublisher={EDP Sciences}\n}\n\n@article{radice2012thc,\n\ttitle={{THC: a new high-order finite-difference high-resolution shock-capturing code for special-relativistic hydrodynamics}},\n\tauthor={Radice, David and Rezzolla, Luciano},\n\tjournal={Astron. Astrophys.},\n\tvolume={547},\n\tpages={A26},\n\tyear={2012},\n\tpublisher={EDP Sciences}\n}\n\n@article{KIDDER201784,\n title = {{SpECTRE}: A task-based discontinuous {Galerkin} code for relativistic astrophysics},\n author = {Kidder, Lawrence E. and Field, Scott E. and Foucart, Francois and Schnetter, Erik and Teukolsky, Saul A. and Bohn, Andy and Deppe, Nils and Diener, Peter and H{\\'e}bert, Francois and Lippuner, Jonas and Scheel, Mark A. and Szil{\\'a}gyi, Bela},\n journal = {J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume = {335},\n pages = {84--114},\n year = {2017},\n doi = {10.1016/j.jcp.2016.12.046},\n}\n\n\n@article{2006Zhang,\n title={{RAM: A relativistic adaptive mesh refinement hydrodynamics code}},\n author={Zhang, Weiqun and MacFadyen, Andrew I},\n journal={Astrophys. J. Suppl. S.},\n volume={164},\n number={1},\n pages={255},\n year={2006},\n publisher={IOP Publishing}\n}\n\n@article{hughes2002three,\n title={Three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations of relativistic extragalactic jets},\n author={Hughes, Philip A and Miller, Mark A and Duncan, G Comer},\n journal={Astrophys. J.},\n volume={572},\n number={2},\n pages={713},\n year={2002},\n publisher={IOP Publishing}\n}\n\n@article{zhang2012positivity,\n title={Positivity-preserving high order finite difference {WENO} schemes for compressible {E}uler equations},\n author={Zhang, Xiangxiong and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={231},\n number={5},\n pages={2245--2258},\n year={2012},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{qiu2011positivity,\n title={{Positivity preserving semi-Lagrangian discontinuous Galerkin formulation: theoretical analysis and application to the Vlasov--Poisson system}},\n author={Qiu, Jing-Mei and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={230},\n number={23},\n pages={8386--8409},\n year={2011},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{cheng2014positivity,\n title={Positivity-preserving Lagrangian scheme for multi-material compressible flow},\n author={Cheng, Juan and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={257},\n pages={143--168},\n year={2014},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{jiang2013parametrized,\n title={Parametrized maximum principle preserving limiter for finite difference {WENO} schemes solving convection-dominated diffusion equations},\n author={Jiang, Yi and Xu, Zhengfu},\n journal={SIAM J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={35},\n number={6},\n pages={A2524--A2553},\n year={2013},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@article{xiong2013parametrized,\n title={A parametrized maximum principle preserving flux limiter for finite difference {RK-WENO} schemes with applications in incompressible flows},\n author={Xiong, Tao and Qiu, Jing-Mei and Xu, Zhengfu},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={252},\n pages={310--331},\n year={2013},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{deppe2023positivity,\n title={A positivity-preserving adaptive-order finite-difference scheme for {GRMHD}},\n author={Deppe, Nils and Kidder, Lawrence E and Teukolsky, Saul A and Bonilla, Marceline S and H{\\'e}bert, Fran{\\c{c}}ois and Kim, Yoonsoo and Scheel, Mark A and Throwe, William and Vu, Nils L},\n journal={Class. Quantum Grav.},\n volume={40},\n number={24},\n pages={245014},\n year={2023},\n publisher={IOP Publishing}\n}\n\n@article{boms1971fluid,\n title={A fluid transport algorithm that works},\n author={Boris, Jay P},\n journal={Computing as a Language},\n volume={9},\n pages={171--189},\n year={1971}\n}\n\n@article{boris1973flux,\n title={Flux-corrected transport. {I. SHASTA}, a fluid transport algorithm that works},\n author={Boris, Jay P and Book, David L},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={11},\n number={1},\n pages={38--69},\n year={1973},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{book1975flux,\n title={Flux-corrected transport {II: G}eneralizations of the method},\n author={Book, David L and Boris, Jay P and Hain, K},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={18},\n number={3},\n pages={248--283},\n year={1975},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{boris1976flux,\n title={Flux-corrected transport. {III. Minimal-error FCT} algorithms},\n author={Boris, Jay P and Book, David L},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={20},\n number={4},\n pages={397--431},\n year={1976},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@book{devore1998improved,\n title={An improved limiter for multidimensional flux-corrected transport},\n author={DeVore, C Richard},\n volume={6440},\n number={98-8330},\n year={1998},\n publisher={Naval Research Laboratory, Center for Computational Physics Development}\n}\n\n@article{kuzmin2001positive,\n title={Positive finite element schemes based on the flux-corrected transport procedure},\n author={Kuzmin, D},\n journal={Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, Elsevier},\n pages={887--888},\n year={2001}\n}\n\n@article{kuzmin2004high,\n title={High-resolution {FEM--FCT} schemes for multidimensional conservation laws},\n author={Kuzmin, Dimitri and M{\\\"o}ller, Matthias and Turek, Stefan},\n journal={Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.},\n volume={193},\n number={45-47},\n pages={4915--4946},\n year={2004},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{kuzmin2020monolithic,\n title={Monolithic convex limiting for continuous finite element discretizations of hyperbolic conservation laws},\n author={Kuzmin, Dmitri},\n journal={Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.},\n volume={361},\n pages={112804},\n year={2020},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@book{kuzmin2024property,\n title={Property-preserving numerical schemes for conservation laws},\n author={Kuzmin, Dmitri and Hajduk, Hennes},\n year={2024},\n publisher={World Scientific}\n}\n\n@article{wu2025high,\n title={High Order Numerical Methods Preserving Invariant Domain for Hyperbolic and Related Systems},\n author={Wu, Kailiang and Zhang, Xiangxiong and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={SIAM Rev.},\n volume={in press},\n year={2025},\n note={\\href{https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.09116}{https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.09116}}\n}\n\n@article{duan2021entropy,\n title={Entropy stable adaptive moving mesh schemes for {2D and 3D} special relativistic hydrodynamics},\n author={Duan, Junming and Tang, Huazhong},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={426},\n pages={109949},\n year={2021},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{cao2025robust,\n title={Robust discontinuous {G}alerkin methods maintaining physical constraints for general relativistic hydrodynamics},\n author={Cao, Huihui and Peng, Manting and Wu, Kailiang},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={526},\n pages={113770},\n year={2025},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{cai2024provably,\n title={Provably convergent Newton--Raphson methods for recovering primitive variables with applications to physical-constraint-preserving Hermite WENO schemes for relativistic hydrodynamics},\n author={Cai, Chaoyi and Qiu, Jianxian and Wu, Kailiang},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={498},\n pages={112669},\n year={2024},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n% -----------------------------------------------------------------------------\n% above references are added after 2025.12.17\n% -----------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n@incollection {lax1971shock,\n\tAUTHOR = {Lax, Peter},\n\tTITLE = {Shock waves and entropy},\n\tBOOKTITLE = {Contributions to nonlinear functional analysis ({P}roc.\n\t{S}ympos., {M}ath. {R}es. {C}enter, {U}niv. {W}isconsin,\n\t{M}adison, {W}is., 1971)},\n\tPAGES = {603--634},\n\tPUBLISHER = {Academic Press, New York-London},\n\tYEAR = {1971},\n\tMRCLASS = {35L65 (76.35)},\n\tMRNUMBER = {393870},\n\tMRREVIEWER = {Alan\\ Jeffrey},\n}\n\n\n@article{berthon2015entropy,\n\ttitle={An entropy preserving relaxation scheme for ten-moments equations with source terms},\n\tauthor={Berthon, Christophe and Dubroca, Bruno and Sangam, Afeintou},\n\tjournal={Commun. Math. Sci.},\n\tvolume={13},\n\tnumber={8},\n\tpages={2119--2154},\n\tyear={2015},\n\tpublisher={International Press of Boston}\n}ï¼?\n@article{ding2025,\n\ttitle = {Robust {DG} schemes on unstructured triangular meshes: Oscillation elimination and bound preservation via optimal convex decomposition},\n\tjournal = {J. Comput. Phys.},\n\tvolume = {526},\n\tpages = {113769},\n\tyear = {2025},\n\tissn = {0021-9991},\n\tdoi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2025.113769},\n\turl = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002199912500052X},\n\tauthor = {Shengrong Ding and Shumo Cui and Kailiang Wu},\n}\n\n@article {cui20203,\n\tAUTHOR = {Cui, Shumo and Ding, Shengrong and Wu, Kailiang},\n\tTITLE = {Is the classic convex decomposition optimal for\n\tbound-preserving schemes in multiple dimensions?},\n\tJOURNAL = {J. Comput. Phys.},\n\tFJOURNAL = {Journal of Computational Physics},\n\tVOLUME = {476},\n\tYEAR = {2023},\n\tPAGES = {Paper No. 111882, 16},\n\tISSN = {0021-9991,1090-2716},\n\tMRCLASS = {65M60 (35L65)},\n\tMRNUMBER = {4531554},\n\tDOI = {10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111882},\n\tURL = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111882},\n}\n\n@article{coquel1998relaxation,\n title={Relaxation of energy and approximate {R}iemann solvers for general pressure laws in fluid dynamics},\n author={Coquel, Fr{\\'e}d{\\'e}ric and Perthame, Beno{\\i}â?t},\n journal={SIAM J. Numer. Anal.},\n volume={35},\n number={6},\n pages={2223--2249},\n year={1998},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n\n@article{berthon2023artificial,\n title={Artificial viscosity to get both robustness and discrete entropy inequalities},\n author={Berthon, Christophe and Castro D{\\'\\i}az, Manuel J and Duran, Arnaud and Morales de Luna, Tom{\\'a}s and Saleh, Khaled},\n journal={J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={97},\n number={3},\n pages={65},\n year={2023},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n@article{BERTHON2018284,\n title = {A simple fully well-balanced and entropy preserving scheme for the shallow-water equations},\n journal = {Applied Mathematics Letters},\n volume = {86},\n pages = {284-290},\n year = {2018},\n issn = {0893-9659},\n author = {Christophe Berthon and Victor Michel-Dansac},\n}\n\n@article{berthon2012local,\n title={A local entropy minimum principle for deriving entropy preserving schemes},\n author={Berthon, Christophe and Dubroca, Bruno and Sangam, Afeintou},\n journal={SIAM J. Numer. Anal.},\n volume={50},\n number={2},\n pages={468--491},\n year={2012},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n\n@article{suresh1997accurate,\n title={Accurate monotonicity-preserving schemes with {Runge--Kutta} time stepping},\n author={Suresh, Ambady and Huynh, Hung T},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={136},\n number={1},\n pages={83--99},\n year={1997},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{duan2021,\n\ttitle={High-order accurate entropy stable finite difference schemes for the shallow water magnetohydrodynamics},\n\tauthor={Duan, Junming and Tang, Huazhong},\n\tjournal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n\tvolume={431},\n\tpages={110136},\n\tyear={2021},\n\tpublisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{berthon2014entropy,\n title={An entropy preserving {MOOD} scheme for the {E}uler equations},\n author={Berthon, Christophe and Desveaux, Vivien},\n journal={International Journal on Finite Volumes},\n pages={1--39},\n year={2014}\n}\n\n@article{berthon2016fully,\n title={A fully well-balanced, positive and entropy-satisfying {G}odunov-type method for the shallow-water equations},\n author={Berthon, Christophe and Chalons, Christophe},\n journal={Math. Comp. },\n volume={85},\n number={299},\n pages={1281--1307},\n year={2016}\n}\n\n@article{zhao2022strictly,\n title={Strictly convex entropy and entropy stable schemes for reactive {E}uler equations},\n author={Zhao, Weifeng},\n journal={Math. Comp. },\n volume={91},\n number={334},\n pages={735--760},\n year={2022}\n}\n\n@article{jiang1994cell,\n title={On a cell entropy inequality for discontinuous {G}alerkin methods},\n author={Jiang, Guang Shan and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={Math. Comp. },\n volume={62},\n number={206},\n pages={531--538},\n year={1994}\n}\n\n@article{duan2022analytical,\n title={An analytical solution of the isentropic vortex problem in the special relativistic magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={Duan, Junming and Tang, Huazhong},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={456},\n pages={110903},\n year={2022},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{he2012adaptive1,\n\ttitle={An adaptive moving mesh method for two-dimensional relativistic hydrodynamics},\n\tauthor={He, Peng and Tang, Huazhong},\n\tjournal={Commun. Comput. Phys.},\n\tvolume={11},\n\tnumber={1},\n\tpages={114--146},\n\tyear={2012},\n\tpublisher={Cambridge University Press}\n}\n\n@article{chen2022physical,\n title={{A physical-constraint-preserving finite volume WENO method for special relativistic hydrodynamics on unstructured meshes}},\n author={Chen, Yaping and Wu, Kailiang},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={466},\n pages={111398},\n year={2022},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{ching2024positivity,\n title={Positivity-preserving and entropy-bounded discontinuous {G}alerkin method for the chemically reacting, compressible {E}uler equations. Part {I}: The one-dimensional case},\n author={Ching, Eric J and Johnson, Ryan F and Kercher, Andrew D},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n pages={112881},\n year={2024},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{ching2024positivity2,\n title={Positivity-preserving and entropy-bounded discontinuous {G}alerkin method for the chemically reacting, compressible {E}uler equations. Part {II}: The multidimensional case},\n author={Ching, Eric J and Johnson, Ryan F and Kercher, Andrew D},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={505},\n pages={112878},\n year={2024},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{ching2025positivity,\n title={Positivity-preserving and entropy-bounded discontinuous {G}alerkin method for the chemically reacting, compressible {N}avier-{S}tokes equations},\n author={Ching, Eric J and Johnson, Ryan F and Burrows, Sarah and Higgs, Jacklyn and Kercher, Andrew D},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n pages={113746},\n year={2025},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{xu2024high,\n title={High-Order Accurate Entropy Stable Schemes for Relativistic Hydrodynamics with General Synge-Type Equation of State},\n author={Xu, Linfeng and Ding, Shengrong and Wu, Kailiang},\n journal={J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={98},\n number={2},\n pages={43},\n year={2024},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{cui2024optimal,\n title={On optimal cell average decomposition for high-order bound-preserving schemes of hyperbolic conservation laws},\n author={Cui, Shumo and Ding, Shengrong and Wu, Kailiang},\n journal={SIAM J. Numer. Anal.},\n volume={62},\n number={2},\n pages={775--810},\n year={2024},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@article{taub1948relativistic,\n\ttitle={Relativistic rankine-hugoniot equations},\n\tauthor={Taub, AH},\n\tjournal={Phys. Rev.},\n\tvolume={74},\n\tnumber={3},\n\tpages={328},\n\tyear={1948},\n\tpublisher={APS}\n}\n\n@article{wu2023geometric,\n title={Geometric quasilinearization framework for analysis and design of bound-preserving schemes},\n author={Wu, Kailiang and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={SIAM Rev.},\n volume={65},\n number={4},\n pages={1031--1073},\n year={2023},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@article{ryu2006equation,\n\ttitle={Equation of state in numerical relativistic hydrodynamics},\n\tauthor={Ryu, Dongsu and Chattopadhyay, Indranil and Choi, Eunwoo},\n\tjournal={Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.},\n\tvolume={166},\n\tnumber={1},\n\tpages={410},\n\tyear={2006},\n\tpublisher={IOP Publishing}\n}\n\n@article{sokolov2001simple,\n\ttitle={Simple and efficient {G}odunov scheme for computational relativistic gas dynamics},\n\tauthor={Sokolov, IV and Zhang, H-M and Sakai, JI},\n\tjournal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n\tvolume={172},\n\tnumber={1},\n\tpages={209--234},\n\tyear={2001},\n\tpublisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{mignone2005piecewise,\n\ttitle={The piecewise parabolic method for multidimensional relativistic fluid dynamics},\n\tauthor={Mignone, A and Plewa, T and Bodo, G},\n\tjournal={Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.},\n\tvolume={160},\n\tnumber={1},\n\tpages={199},\n\tyear={2005},\n\tpublisher={IOP Publishing}\n}\n\n@article{mathews1971hydromagnetic,\n\ttitle={The hydromagnetic free expansion of a relativistic gas},\n\tauthor={Mathews, William G},\n\tjournal={Astrophys. J., vol. 165, p. 147},\n\tvolume={165},\n\tpages={147},\n\tyear={1971}\n}\n\n@article{WuMEP2021,\n\ttitle={Minimum principle on specific entropy and high-order accurate invariant region preserving numerical methods for relativistic hydrodynamics},\n\tauthor={Wu, Kailiang},\n\tjournal={SIAM J. Sci. Comput.},\n\tvolume={43},\n\tnumber={6},\n\tpages={B1164--B1197},\n\tyear={2021},\n\tpublisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n% -----------------------------------------------------------------------------\n% above references are added after 2023.6.23\n% -----------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n@inproceedings{endeve2019thornado,\n title={thornado-hydro: towards discontinuous {Galerkin} methods for supernova hydrodynamics},\n author={Endeve, Eirik and Buffaloe, Jesse and Dunham, Samuel J and Roberts, Nick and Andrew, Kristopher and Barker, Brandon and Pochik, David and Pulsinelli, Juliana and Mezzacappa, Anthony},\n booktitle={Journal of Physics: Conference Series},\n volume={1225},\n number={1},\n pages={012014},\n year={2019},\n organization={IOP Publishing}\n}\n\n@article{Guermond2014,\nauthor = {Guermond, Jean-Luc and Popov, Bojan},\ntitle = {Viscous Regularization of the {Euler} Equations and Entropy Principles},\njournal = {SIAM J. Appl. Math.},\nvolume = {74},\nnumber = {2},\npages = {284--305},\nyear = {2014}\n}\n\n\n@article{marquina2019capturing,\n title={Capturing Composite Waves in Non-convex Special Relativistic Hydrodynamics},\n author={Marquina, Antonio and Serna, Susana and Ib{\\'a}{\\~n}ez, Jos{\\'e} M},\n journal={J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={81},\n number={3},\n pages={2132--2161},\n year={2019},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n\n@inproceedings{anile1987mathematical,\n title={On the mathematical structure of test relativistic magnetofluiddynamics},\n author={Anile, AM and Pennisi, Sebastiano},\n booktitle={Annales de l'IHP Physique th{\\'e}orique},\n volume={46},\n pages={27--44},\n year={1987}\n}\n\n@article{khobalatte1994maximum,\n title={Maximum principle on the entropy and second-order kinetic schemes},\n author={Khobalatte, B. and Perthame, B.},\n journal={Math. Comp. },\n volume={62},\n number={205},\n pages={119--131},\n year={1994}\n}\n\n\n@inproceedings{FMT09,\n\tauthor = \"Fjordholm, U. S. and Mishra, S. and Tadmor, E.\",\n\tbooktitle = \"{Foundations of Computational Mathematics, Hong Kong 2008}\",\n\tpages = \"93--139\",\n\tseries = \"{London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes Series}\",\n\ttitle = \"{Energy preserving and energy stable schemes for the shallow water equations}\",\n\tvolume = \"363\",\n\tyear = \"2009\"\n}\n\n@article{TadmorZhong2006,\nauthor = {Tadmor, E. and Zhong, W.},\ntitle = {Entropy Stable Approximations of {Navier--Stokes} Equations with no artificial numerical viscosity},\njournal = {J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ.},\nvolume = {03},\nnumber = {03},\npages = {529-559},\nyear = {2006}\n}\n\n\n@article{LV2015715,\ntitle = \"Entropy-bounded discontinuous {Galerkin} scheme for {Euler} equations\",\njournal = \"J. Comput. Phys.\",\nvolume = \"295\",\npages = \"715--739\",\nyear = \"2015\",\nauthor = \"Yu Lv and Matthias Ihme\"\n}\n\n\n@article{anton2010relativistic,\n title={Relativistic magnetohydrodynamics: renormalized eigenvectors and full wave decomposition {Riemann} solver},\n author={Ant{\\'o}n, Luis and Miralles, Juan A and Mart{\\'\\i}, Jos{\\'e} M and Ib{\\'a}{\\~n}ez, Jos{\\'e} M and Aloy, Miguel A and Mimica, Petar},\n journal={Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.},\n volume={188},\n number={1},\n pages={1},\n year={2010},\n publisher={IOP Publishing}\n}\n\n\n@article{abgrall2018general,\n title={A general framework to construct schemes satisfying additional conservation relations. Application to entropy conservative and entropy dissipative schemes},\n author={Abgrall, Remi},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={372},\n pages={640--666},\n year={2018},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n@article{Artebrant2008,\n title={Increasing the accuracy in locally divergence-preserving finite volume schemes for {MHD}},\n author={Artebrant, Robert and Torrilhon, Manuel},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={227},\n number={6},\n pages={3405--3427},\n year={2008},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n@Article{Balbas2006,\nauthor = {Jorge Balb\\'as and Eitan Tadmor},\ntitle = {Nonoscillatory Central Schemes for One- and Two-Dimensional Magnetohydrodynamics Equations. {II}: High-Order SemiDiscrete Schemes},\njournal = {SIAM J. Sci. Comput.},\nvolume = {28},\nnumber = {2},\npages = {533--560},\nyear = {2006}\n}\n\n@article{Balsara2001,\n title={Total variation diminishing scheme for relativistic magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={Balsara, Dinshaw},\n journal={Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.},\n volume={132},\n number={1},\n pages={83},\n year={2001},\n publisher={IOP Publishing}\n}\n\n\n@Article{Balsara2004, \n title = {Second-order-accurate schemes for magnetohydrodynamics with divergence-free reconstruction},\n author = {D. S. Balsara},\n journal = {Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.},\n volume = 151,\n year = 2004,\n pages = {149--184}\n}\n\n\n@article{BALSARA20101970,\ntitle = \"Multidimensional {HLLE} {Riemann} solver: Application to {Euler} and magnetohydrodynamic flows\",\njournal = \"J. Comput. Phys.\",\nvolume = \"229\",\nnumber = \"6\",\npages = \"1970--1993\",\nyear = \"2010\",\nauthor = \"Dinshaw S. Balsara\"\n}\n\n@article{BALSARA20127476,\ntitle = \"A two-dimensional {HLLC} {Riemann} solver for conservation laws: {Application} to {Euler} and magnetohydrodynamic flows\",\njournal = \"J. Comput. Phys.\",\nvolume = \"231\",\nnumber = \"22\",\npages = \"7476--7503\",\nyear = \"2012\",\nauthor = \"Dinshaw S. Balsara\"\n}\n\n\n\n@Article{Balsara2012,\n title = {Self-adjusting, positivity preserving high order schemes for hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics},\n author = {D. S. Balsara},\n journal = {J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume = 231,\n year = 2012,\n pages = {7504--7517}\n}\n\n\n@article{BALSARA2014172,\ntitle = \"Multidimensional {HLLC} {Riemann} solver for unstructured meshes --- {With} application to {Euler} and {MHD} flows\",\njournal = \"J. Comput. Phys.\",\nvolume = \"261\",\npages = \"172--208\",\nyear = \"2014\",\nauthor = \"Dinshaw S. Balsara and Michael Dumbser and Remi Abgrall\"\n}\n\n@article{BalsaraKim2016,\n title={A subluminal relativistic magnetohydrodynamics scheme with {ADER-WENO} predictor and multidimensional {Riemann} solver-based corrector},\n author={Balsara, Dinshaw S and Kim, Jinho},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={312},\n pages={357--384},\n year={2016},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@Article{BalsaraSpicer1999a,\n title = {Maintaining pressure positivity in magnetohydrodynamic simulations},\n author = {D. S. Balsara and D. Spicer},\n journal = {J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume = 148,\n year = 1999,\n pages = {133--148}\n}\n\n\n@Article{BalsaraSpicer1999,\n title = {A staggered mesh algorithm using high order {Godunov} fluxes to ensure solenoidal magnetic fields in magnetohydrodynamic simulations},\n author = {D. S. Balsara and D. Spicer},\n journal = {J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume = 149,\n year = 1999,\n pages = {270--292}\n}\n\n@incollection{Barth1998,\n title={Numerical methods for gasdynamic systems on unstructured meshes},\n author={Barth, Timothy},\n booktitle={An introduction to recent developments in theory and numerics for conservation laws},\n pages={195--285},\n year={1999},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\t\n\n@incollection{Barth2006,\n title={On the role of involutions in the discontinuous {Galerkin} discretization of {Maxwell} and magnetohydrodynamic systems},\n author={Barth, Timothy},\n booktitle={Compatible spatial discretizations},\n pages={69--88},\n year={2006},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{biswas2018low,\n title={Low dissipative entropy stable schemes using third order {WENO} and {TVD} reconstructions},\n author={Biswas, Biswarup and Dubey, Ritesh Kumar},\n journal={Adv. Comput. Math.},\n volume={44},\n number={4},\n pages={1153--1181},\n year={2018},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n@article{bouchut1996muscl,\n title={A {MUSCL} method satisfying all the numerical entropy inequalities},\n author={Bouchut, Fran{\\c{c}}ois and Bourdarias, Ch and Perthame, Benoit},\n journal={Math. Comp. },\n volume={65},\n number={216},\n pages={1439--1461},\n year={1996}\n}\n\n\n@article{Bouchut2007,\n title={A multiwave approximate {Riemann} solver for ideal {MHD} based on relaxation. {I}: theoretical framework},\n author={Bouchut, Fran{\\c{c}}ois and Klingenberg, Christian and Waagan, Knut},\n journal={Numer. Math.},\n volume={108},\n number={1},\n pages={7--42},\n year={2007},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Bouchut2010,\n title={A multiwave approximate {Riemann} solver for ideal {MHD} based on relaxation {II}: numerical implementation with 3 and 5 waves},\n author={Bouchut, Fran{\\c{c}}ois and Klingenberg, Christian and Waagan, Knut},\n journal={Numer. Math.},\n volume={115},\n number={4},\n pages={647--679},\n year={2010},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n@article{Brackbill1980,\n title={The effect of nonzero {$\\nabla \\cdot {\\bf {B}}$} on\n\t\tthe numerical solution of the magnetodydrodynamic equations},\n author={Brackbill, Jeremiah U and Barnes, Daniel C},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={35},\n number={3},\n pages={426--430},\n year={1980},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{carpenter2014entropy,\n title={Entropy Stable Spectral Collocation Schemes for the {Navier--Stokes} Equations: Discontinuous Interfaces},\n author={Carpenter, Mark H and Fisher, Travis C and Nielsen, Eric J and Frankel, Steven H},\n journal={SIAM J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={36},\n number={5},\n pages={B835--B867},\n year={2014},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@article{cheng,\n title={Positivity-preserving {DG} and central {DG} methods for ideal {MHD} equations},\n author={Cheng, Yue and Li, Fengyan and Qiu, Jianxian and Xu, Liwei},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={238},\n pages={255--280},\n year={2013},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{chan2018discretely,\n title={On discretely entropy conservative and entropy stable discontinuous {Galerkin} methods},\n author={Chan, Jesse},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={362},\n pages={346--374},\n year={2018},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{chandrashekar2013kinetic,\n title={Kinetic energy preserving and entropy stable finite volume schemes for compressible {Euler} and {Navier-Stokes} equations},\n author={Chandrashekar, Praveen},\n journal={Commun. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={14},\n number={5},\n pages={1252--1286},\n year={2013},\n publisher={Cambridge University Press}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{chandrashekar2019global,\n title={A global divergence conforming {DG} method for hyperbolic conservation laws with divergence constraint},\n author={Chandrashekar, Praveen},\n journal={J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={79},\n number={1},\n pages={79--102},\n year={2019},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n@article{Chandrashekar2016,\n title={Entropy stable finite volume scheme for ideal compressible {MHD} on {2-D} {Cartesian} meshes},\n author={Chandrashekar, Praveen and Klingenberg, Christian},\n journal={SIAM J. Numer. Anal.},\n volume={54},\n number={2},\n pages={1313--1340},\n year={2016},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@incollection{Chandrashekar2016b,\n author =\t {P. Chandrashekar and P. Gallego and C. Klingenberg},\n title =\t {A {Runge-Kutta} discontinuous {Galerkin} scheme for the ideal magnetohydrodynamical model},\n booktitle = {Springer Proceedings in Mathematics \\& Statistics: Theory, Numerics and Applications of Hyperbolic Problems, edited by C. Klingenberg and M. Westdickenberg},\n volume = {236},\n publisher = {Springer},\n year = {2018}\n}\n\n@article{chen2017entropy,\n title={Entropy stable high order discontinuous {Galerkin} methods with suitable quadrature rules for hyperbolic conservation laws},\n author={Chen, Tianheng and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={345},\n pages={427--461},\n year={2017},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n@article{Christlieb2016,\n title={A high-order positivity-preserving single-stage single-step method for the ideal magnetohydrodynamic equations},\n author={Christlieb, Andrew J and Feng, Xiao and Seal, David C and Tang, Qi},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={316},\n pages={218--242},\n year={2016},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{Christlieb,\n title={Positivity-preserving finite difference weighted {ENO} schemes with constrained transport for ideal magnetohydrodynamic equations},\n author={Christlieb, Andrew J and Liu, Yuan and Tang, Qi and Xu, Zhengfu},\n journal={SIAM J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={37},\n number={4},\n pages={A1825--A1845},\n year={2015},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@article{Christlieb2014,\n title={Finite difference weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with constrained transport for ideal magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={Christlieb, Andrew J and Rossmanith, James A and Tang, Qi},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={268},\n pages={302--325},\n year={2014},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n@article{christlieb2015high,\n title={High order parametrized maximum-principle-preserving and positivity-preserving {WENO} schemes on unstructured meshes},\n author={Christlieb, Andrew J and Liu, Yuan and Tang, Qi and Xu, Zhengfu},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={281},\n pages={334--351},\n year={2015},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{CockburnShu1989,\n title={{TVB} {Runge-Kutta} local projection discontinuous {Galerkin} finite element method for conservation laws. {II.} {General} framework},\n author={Cockburn, Bernardo and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={Math. Comp. },\n volume={52},\n number={186},\n pages={411--435},\n year={1989}\n}\n\n\n@article{CockburnHouShu1990,\n title={The {Runge-Kutta} local projection discontinuous {Galerkin} finite element method for conservation laws. {IV.} {The} multidimensional case},\n author={Cockburn, Bernardo and Hou, Suchung and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={Math. Comp. },\n volume={54},\n number={190},\n pages={545--581},\n year={1990}\n}\n\n@article{crandall1980monotone,\n title={Monotone difference approximations for scalar conservation laws},\n author={Crandall, Michael G and Majda, Andrew},\n journal={Math. Comp. },\n volume={34},\n number={149},\n pages={1--21},\n year={1980}\n}\n\n\n@article{Dai1998,\n title={A simple finite difference scheme for multidimensional magnetohydrodynamical equations},\n author={Dai, Wenlong and Woodward, Paul R},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={142},\n number={2},\n pages={331--369},\n year={1998},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n@article{davis1988simplified,\n title={Simplified second-order {Godunov-type} methods},\n author={Davis, S. F.},\n journal={SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comp.},\n volume={9},\n number={3},\n pages={445--473},\n year={1988},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n\n@article{Dedner2002,\n title={Hyperbolic divergence cleaning for the {MHD} equations},\n author={Dedner, Andreas and Kemm, Friedemann and Kr{\\\"o}ner, Dietmar and Munz, C-D and Schnitzer, Thomas and Wesenberg, Matthias},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={175},\n number={2},\n pages={645--673},\n year={2002},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n@article{del2007echo,\n\ttitle={{ECHO}: a {Eulerian} conservative high-order scheme for general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics and magnetodynamics},\n\tauthor={Del Zanna, L and Zanotti, O and Bucciantini, N and Londrillo, P},\n\tjournal={Astron.~\\& Astrophys.},\n\tvolume={473},\n\tnumber={1},\n\tpages={11--30},\n\tyear={2007},\n\tpublisher={EDP Sciences}\n}\n\n\n@article{Dellar2001,\n title={A note on magnetic monopoles and the one-dimensional {MHD} {Riemann} problem},\n author={Dellar, Paul J},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={172},\n number={1},\n pages={392--398},\n year={2001},\n publisher={Elsevier Science}\n}\n\n\n@article{derigs2016novel,\n title={A novel high-order, entropy stable, {3D AMR MHD} solver with guaranteed positive pressure},\n author={Derigs, Dominik and Winters, Andrew R and Gassner, Gregor J and Walch, Stefanie},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={317},\n pages={223--256},\n year={2016},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@Article{Derigs2018,\nauthor=\"Derigs, Dominik\nand Gassner, Gregor J.\nand Walch, Stefanie\nand Winters, Andrew R.\",\ntitle=\"Entropy Stable Finite Volume Approximations for Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics\",\njournal=\"Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung\",\nyear=\"2018\"\n}\n\n\n@article{DERIGS2018420,\ntitle = \"Ideal {GLM-MHD}: {About} the entropy consistent nine-wave magnetic field divergence diminishing ideal magnetohydrodynamics equations\",\njournal = \"J. Comput. Phys.\",\nvolume = \"364\",\npages = \"420--467\",\nyear = \"2018\",\nauthor = \"Dominik Derigs and Andrew R. Winters and Gregor J. Gassner and Stefanie Walch and Marvin Bohm\"\n}\n\n\n\n@article{du2018positivity,\n title={Positivity-preserving high-order schemes for conservation laws on arbitrarily distributed point clouds with a simple {WENO} limiter},\n author={Du, Jie and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model.},\n volume={15},\n pages={1--25},\n year={2018}\n}\n\n\n@article{duan2019high,\n title={High-order accurate entropy stable finite difference schemes for one-and two-dimensional special relativistic hydrodynamics},\n author={Duan, Junming and Tang, Huazhong},\n journal = {Adv. Appl. Math. Mech.},\nyear = {2020},\nvolume = {12},\nnumber = {1},\npages = {1--29}\n}\n\n\n@article{einfeldt1991godunov,\n title={On {Godunov-type} methods near low densities},\n author={Einfeldt, Bernd and Munz, Claus-Dieter and Roe, Philip L and Sj{\\\"o}green, Bj{\\\"o}rn},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={92},\n number={2},\n pages={273--295},\n year={1991},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Evans1988,\n title={Simulation of magnetohydrodynamic flows: a constrained transport method},\n author={Evans, Charles R and Hawley, John F},\n journal={Astrophys. J.},\n volume={332},\n pages={659--677},\n year={1988}\n}\n\n@article{fisher2013high,\n title={High-order entropy stable finite difference schemes for nonlinear conservation laws: Finite domains},\n author={Fisher, Travis C and Carpenter, Mark H},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={252},\n pages={518--557},\n year={2013},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{fjordholm2016sign,\n\ttitle={A sign preserving {WENO} reconstruction method},\n\tauthor={Fjordholm, Ulrik S and Ray, Deep},\n\tjournal={J. Sci. Comput.},\n\tvolume={68},\n\tnumber={1},\n\tpages={42--63},\n\tyear={2016},\n\tpublisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{fjordholm2012arbitrarily,\n title={Arbitrarily high-order accurate entropy stable essentially nonoscillatory schemes for systems of conservation laws},\n author={Fjordholm, Ulrik S and Mishra, Siddhartha and Tadmor, Eitan},\n journal={SIAM J. Numer. Anal.},\n volume={50},\n number={2},\n pages={544--573},\n year={2012},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{fjordholm2013eno,\n title={{ENO} reconstruction and {ENO} interpolation are stable},\n author={Fjordholm, Ulrik S and Mishra, Siddhartha and Tadmor, Eitan},\n journal={Found. Comput. Math.},\n volume={13},\n number={2},\n pages={139--159},\n year={2013},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n\n\n@article{font2008,\n title={Numerical hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics in general relativity},\n author={Font, Jos{\\'e} A},\n journal={Living Rev. Relativ.},\n volume={11},\n number={1},\n pages={7},\n year={2008},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n@article{freistuhler2013symmetrizations,\n title={Symmetrizations of {RMHD} equations and stability of relativistic current--vortex sheets},\n author={Freist{\\\"u}hler, Heinrich and Trakhinin, Yuri},\n journal={Classical and Quantum Gravity},\n volume={30},\n number={8},\n pages={085012},\n year={2013},\n publisher={IOP Publishing}\n}\n\n\n@Article{Fu2018,\nauthor=\"Fu, Pei\nand Li, Fengyan\nand Xu, Yan\",\ntitle=\"Globally Divergence-Free Discontinuous {Galerkin} Methods for Ideal Magnetohydrodynamic Equations\",\njournal=\"J. Sci. Comput.\",\n volume={77},\n number={3},\n year={2018},\n pages={1621--1659}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{fuchs2011, \ntitle={Approximate {Riemann} solvers and robust high-order finite volume schemes for multi-dimensional ideal {MHD} equations}, \nvolume={9}, \nnumber={2}, \njournal={Commun. Comput. Phys.}, \npublisher={Cambridge University Press}, \nauthor={Fuchs, Franz Georg and McMurry, Andrew D. and Mishra, Siddhartha and Risebro, Nils Henrik and Waagan, Knut}, \nyear={2011}, \npages={324--362}\n}\n\n\n@article{Gardiner2005,\n title={An unsplit {Godunov} method for ideal {MHD} via constrained transport},\n author={Gardiner, Thomas A and Stone, James M},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={205},\n number={2},\n pages={509--539},\n year={2005},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{gassner2013skew,\n title={A skew-symmetric discontinuous {Galerkin} spectral element discretization and its relation to {SBP-SAT} finite difference methods},\n author={Gassner, Gregor J},\n journal={SIAM J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={35},\n number={3},\n pages={A1233--A1253},\n year={2013},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@article{gassner2016well,\n title={A well balanced and entropy conservative discontinuous {Galerkin} spectral element method for the shallow water equations},\n author={Gassner, Gregor J and Winters, Andrew R and Kopriva, David A},\n journal={Appl. Math. Comp. },\n volume={272},\n pages={291--308},\n year={2016},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{giacomazzo_rezzolla_2006, \ntitle={The exact solution of the {Riemann} problem in relativistic magnetohydrodynamics}, \nvolume={562}, \njournal={J. Fluid Mech.}, \npublisher={Cambridge University Press}, \nauthor={Guercilena, Federico and Rezzolla, Luciano}, \nyear={2006}, \npages={223--259}\n}\n\n@book{godlewski2013numerical,\n title={Numerical approximation of hyperbolic systems of conservation laws},\n author={Godlewski, Edwige and Raviart, Pierre-Arnaud},\n volume={118},\n year={2013},\n publisher={Springer Science \\& Business Media}\n}\n\n\n@article{guercilena2017entropy,\n title={Entropy-limited hydrodynamics: a novel approach to relativistic hydrodynamics},\n author={Guercilena, Federico and Radice, David and Rezzolla, Luciano},\n journal={Comput. Astrophys. Cosmol.},\n volume={4},\n number={1},\n pages={3},\n year={2017},\n publisher={SpringerOpen}\n}\n\n@article{Godunov1972,\n title={Symmetric form of the equations of magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={Godunov, S. K.},\n journal={Numerical Methods for Mechanics of Continuum Medium},\n volume={1},\n pages={26--34},\n year={1972},\n publisher={Citeseer}\n}\n\n\n@article{Guermond2016,\n title={Fast estimation from above of the maximum wave speed in the {Riemann} problem for the {Euler} equations},\n author={Guermond, Jean-Luc and Popov, Bojan},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={321},\n pages={908--926},\n year={2016},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{guermond2016invariant,\n title={Invariant domains and first-order continuous finite element approximation for hyperbolic systems},\n author={Guermond, Jean-Luc and Popov, Bojan},\n journal={SIAM J. Numer. Anal.},\n volume={54},\n number={4},\n pages={2466--2489},\n year={2016},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@article{guermond2017invariant,\n title={Invariant domains and second-order continuous finite element approximation for scalar conservation equations},\n author={Guermond, Jean-Luc and Popov, Bojan},\n journal={SIAM J. Numer. Anal.},\n volume={55},\n number={6},\n pages={3120--3146},\n year={2017},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n\n@article{guermond2018second,\n title={Second-order invariant domain preserving approximation of the {Euler} equations using convex limiting},\n author={Guermond, Jean-Luc and Nazarov, Murtazo and Popov, Bojan and Tomas, Ignacio},\n journal={SIAM J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={40},\n number={5},\n pages={A3211--A3239},\n year={2018},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@article{guermond2019invariant,\n title={Invariant domain preserving discretization-independent schemes and convex limiting for hyperbolic systems},\n author={Guermond, Jean-Luc and Popov, Bojan and Tomas, Ignacio},\n journal={Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.},\n volume={347},\n pages={143--175},\n year={2019},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{guermond2017invariant2,\n title={Invariant domains preserving arbitrary {Lagrangian} {Eulerian} approximation of hyperbolic systems with continuous finite elements},\n author={Guermond, Jean-Luc and Popov, Bojan and Saavedra, Laura and Yang, Yong},\n journal={SIAM J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={39},\n number={2},\n pages={A385--A414},\n year={2017},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n\n@article{GottliebShuTadmor2001,\n title={Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods},\n author={Gottlieb, Sigal and Shu, Chi-Wang and Tadmor, Eitan},\n journal={SIAM Rev.},\n volume={43},\n number={1},\n pages={89--112},\n year={2001},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n\n@article{Gottlieb2005,\n title={On high order strong stability preserving {Runge-Kutta} and multi step time discretizations},\n author={Gottlieb, Sigal},\n journal={J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={25},\n number={1-2},\n pages={105--128},\n year={2005},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n\n\n@article{Gottlieb2009,\n title={High order strong stability preserving time discretizations},\n author={Gottlieb, Sigal and Ketcheson, David I and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={38},\n number={3},\n pages={251--289},\n year={2009},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{Gurski2004,\nauthor = {Gurski, K.},\ntitle = {An {HLLC-type} Approximate {Riemann} Solver for Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics},\njournal = {SIAM J. Sci. Comput.},\nvolume = {25},\nnumber = {6},\npages = {2165--2187},\nyear = {2004}\n}\n\n\n@article{harten1976finite,\n title={On finite-difference approximations and entropy conditions for shocks},\n author={Harten, Amiram and Hyman, James M and Lax, Peter D and Keyfitz, Barbara},\n journal={Commun. Pure Appl. Math.},\n volume={29},\n number={3},\n pages={297--322},\n year={1976},\n publisher={Wiley Online Library}\n}\n\n@article{HARTEN1983151,\ntitle = \"On the symmetric form of systems of conservation laws with entropy\",\njournal = \"J. Comput. Phys.\",\nvolume = \"49\",\nnumber = \"1\",\npages = \"151--164\",\nyear = \"1983\",\nissn = \"0021-9991\",\nauthor = \"Amiram Harten\"\n}\n\n\n\n@article{HeTang2012RMHD,\n title={An adaptive moving mesh method for two-dimensional relativistic magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={He, Peng and Tang, Huazhong},\n journal={Comput. Fluids},\n volume={60},\n pages={1--20},\n year={2012},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n@article{hesthaven2019entropy,\n title={Entropy stable essentially nonoscillatory methods based on {RBF} reconstruction},\n author={Hesthaven, Jan S and M{\\\"o}nkeberg, Fabian},\n journal={ESAIM. Math. Model Numer. Anal.},\n volume={53},\n number={3},\n pages={925--958},\n year={2019},\n publisher={EDP Sciences}\n}\n\n\n@article{hiltebrand2014entropy,\n title={Entropy stable shock capturing space--time discontinuous {Galerkin} schemes for systems of conservation laws},\n author={Hiltebrand, Andreas and Mishra, Siddhartha},\n journal={Numer. Math.},\n volume={126},\n number={1},\n pages={103--151},\n year={2014},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Hu2013,\n title={Positivity-preserving method for high-order conservative schemes solving compressible {Euler} equations},\n author={Hu, Xiangyu Y and Adams, Nikolaus A and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={242},\n pages={169--180},\n year={2013},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n@article{ismail2009affordable,\n title={Affordable, entropy-consistent {Euler} flux functions {II: Entropy} production at shocks},\n author={Ismail, Farzad and Roe, Philip L},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={228},\n number={15},\n pages={5410--5436},\n year={2009},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n\n\n@article{Janhunen2000,\n title={A positive conservative method for magnetohydrodynamics based on {HLL} and {Roe} methods},\n author={Janhunen, Pekka},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={160},\n number={2},\n pages={649--661},\n year={2000},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{JIANG2018,\ntitle = \"Invariant-region-preserving {DG} methods for multi-dimensional hyperbolic conservation law systems, with an application to compressible {Euler} equations\",\nauthor = \"Yi Jiang and Hailiang Liu\",\njournal = \"J. Comput. Phys.\",\nvolume = \"373\",\npages = \"385--409\",\nyear = \"2018\"\n}\n\n@article{jiang2019invariant,\n title={An invariant-region-preserving limiter for {DG} schemes to isentropic {Euler} equations},\n author={Jiang, Yi and Liu, Hailiang},\n journal={Numer. Methods Part. D. E.},\n volume={35},\n number={1},\n pages={5--33},\n year={2019},\n publisher={Wiley Online Library}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{jiang2016invariant,\n title={An invariant-region-preserving ({IRP}) limiter to {DG} methods for compressible {Euler} equations},\n author={Jiang, Yi and Liu, Hailiang},\n booktitle={Theory, Numerics and Applications of Hyperbolic Problems, II},\n pages={71--83},\n year={2016},\n organization={Springer}\n}\n\n\n@article{komissarov1999godunov,\n title={A {Godunov-type} scheme for relativistic magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={Komissarov, S. S.},\n journal={Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.},\n volume={303},\n number={2},\n pages={343--366},\n year={1999},\n publisher={The Royal Astronomical Society}\n}\n\n@article{Krivodonova,\n title={Shock detection and limiting with discontinuous {Galerkin} methods for hyperbolic conservation laws},\n author={Krivodonova, Lilia and Xin, J and Remacle, J-F and Chevaugeon, Nicolas and Flaherty, Joseph E},\n journal={Appl. Numer. Math.},\n volume={48},\n number={3-4},\n pages={323--338},\n year={2004},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{lefloch2002fully,\n title={Fully discrete, entropy conservative schemes of arbitrary order},\n author={Lefloch, Philippe G and Mercier, Jean-Marc and Rohde, Christian},\n journal={SIAM J. Numer. Anal.},\n volume={40},\n number={5},\n pages={1968--1992},\n year={2002},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@article{LI2005344,\ntitle = \"An {HLLC} {Riemann} solver for magneto-hydrodynamics\",\njournal = \"J. Comput. Phys.\",\nvolume = \"203\",\nnumber = \"1\",\npages = \"344--357\",\nyear = \"2005\",\nauthor = \"Shengtai Li\"\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Li2005,\n title={Locally divergence-free discontinuous {Galerkin} methods for {MHD} equations},\n author={Li, Fengyan and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={22},\n number={1-3},\n pages={413--442},\n year={2005},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n@article{Li2012,\n title={Arbitrary order exactly divergence-free central discontinuous {Galerkin} methods for ideal {MHD} equations},\n author={Li, Fengyan and Xu, Liwei},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={231},\n number={6},\n pages={2655--2675},\n year={2012},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Li2011,\n title={Central discontinuous {Galerkin} methods for ideal {MHD} equations with the exactly divergence-free magnetic field},\n author={Li, Fengyan and Xu, Liwei and Yakovlev, Sergey},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={230},\n number={12},\n pages={4828--4847},\n year={2011},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{Liang2014,\n title={Parametrized maximum principle preserving flux limiters for high order schemes solving multi-dimensional scalar hyperbolic conservation laws},\n author={Liang, Chao and Xu, Zhengfu},\n journal={J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={58},\n number={1},\n pages={41--60},\n year={2014},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n@article{LingDuanTang2019,\ntitle = \"Physical-constraints-preserving {Lagrangian} finite volume schemes for one- and two-dimensional special relativistic hydrodynamics\",\nauthor={Dan Ling and Junming Duan and Huazhong Tang},\njournal = \"J. Comput. Phys.\",\n volume={396},\n pages={507--543},\n year={2019},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n@article{LiuShuZhang2017,\n title={Entropy stable high order discontinuous {Galerkin} methods for ideal compressible {MHD} on structured meshes},\n author={Liu, Yong and Shu, Chi-Wang and Zhang, Mengping},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={354},\n pages={163--178},\n year={2018},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n@article{Londrillo2000,\n title={High-order upwind schemes for multidimensional magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={Londrillo, Pasquale and Del Zanna, Luca},\n journal={Astrophys. J.},\n volume={530},\n number={1},\n pages={508--524},\n year={2000},\n publisher={IOP Publishing}\n}\n\n@article{Marti2015,\n title={Grid-based methods in relativistic hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={Mart{\\'\\i}, Jos{\\'e} Mar{\\'\\i}a and M{\\\"u}ller, Ewald},\n journal={Living Rev. Comput. Astrophys.},\n volume={1},\n number={1},\n pages={3},\n year={2015},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{mignone2005hllc,\n title={An {HLLC} {Riemann} solver for relativistic flows--{I}. {Hydrodynamics}},\n author={Mignone, Andrea and Bodo, G},\n journal={Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.},\n volume={364},\n number={1},\n pages={126--136},\n year={2005},\n publisher={Blackwell Science Ltd Oxford, UK}\n}\n\n@article{MignoneHLLCRMHD,\n title={An {HLLC} Riemann solver for relativistic flows--{II}. Magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={Mignone, Andrea and Bodo, G},\n journal={Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.},\n volume={368},\n number={3},\n pages={1040--1054},\n year={2006},\n publisher={The Royal Astronomical Society}\n}\n\n@article{moe2017positivity,\n title={Positivity-preserving discontinuous Galerkin methods with Lax-Wendroff time discretizations},\n author={Moe, Scott A and Rossmanith, James A and Seal, David C},\n journal={J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={71},\n number={1},\n pages={44--70},\n year={2017},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{MIYOSHI2005315,\ntitle = \"A multi-state {HLL} approximate {Riemann} solver for ideal magnetohydrodynamics\",\njournal = \"J. Computat. Phys.\",\nvolume = \"208\",\nnumber = \"1\",\npages = \"315--344\",\nyear = \"2005\",\nauthor = \"Takahiro Miyoshi and Kanya Kusano\"\n}\n\n\n@article{orszag1979small,\n title={Small-scale structure of two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence},\n author={Orszag, Steven A and Tang, Cha-Mei},\n journal={J. Fluid Mech.},\n volume={90},\n number={1},\n pages={129--143},\n year={1979},\n publisher={Cambridge University Press}\n}\n\n@article{osher1984riemann,\n title={Riemann solvers, the entropy condition, and difference},\n author={Osher, Stanley},\n journal={SIAM J. Numer. Anal.},\n volume={21},\n number={2},\n pages={217--235},\n year={1984},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@article{osher1988convergence,\n title={On the convergence of difference approximations to scalar conservation laws},\n author={Osher, Stanley and Tadmor, Eitan},\n journal={Math. Comp. },\n volume={50},\n number={181},\n pages={19--51},\n year={1988}\n}\n\n\n@article{perthame1996positivity,\n title={On positivity preserving finite volume schemes for {E}uler equations},\n author={Perthame, Benoit and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={Numer. Math.},\n volume={73},\n number={1},\n pages={119--130},\n year={1996},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n@TECHREPORT{Powell1994,\n AUTHOR = {K. G. Powell},\n TITLE = {An approximate {Riemann} solver for magnetohydrodynamics (that works in more than one dimension)},\ninstitution={NASA Langley},\n NUMBER = {ICASE Report No. 94-24},\n ADDRESS = {VA},\nyear=1994\n}\n\n\n\n@inproceedings{Powell1995,\n title={An upwind scheme for magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={Powell, Kenneth G and Roe, Philip and Myong, Rho and Gombosi, Tamas},\n booktitle={12th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference},\n pages={1704},\n year={1995}\n}\n\n@article{QinShu2016,\ntitle = \"Bound-preserving discontinuous {Galerkin} methods for relativistic hydrodynamics\",\njournal = \"J. Comput. Phys.\",\nvolume = \"315\",\npages = \"323--347\",\nyear = \"2016\",\nauthor = \"Tong Qin and Chi-Wang Shu and Yang Yang\"\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Qiu2005,\n title={{Runge--Kutta} Discontinuous {Galerkin} Method Using {WENO} Limiters},\n author={Qiu, Jianxian and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={SIAM J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={26},\n number={3},\n pages={907--929},\n year={2005},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Radice2014,\n title={High-order fully general-relativistic hydrodynamics: new approaches and tests},\n author={Radice, David and Rezzolla, Luciano and Galeazzi, Filippo},\n journal={Class. Quantum Grav.},\n volume={31},\n number={7},\n pages={075012},\n year={2014},\n publisher={IOP Publishing}\n}\n\n\n@article{ranocha2018comparison,\n title={Comparison of some entropy conservative numerical fluxes for the Euler equations},\n author={Ranocha, Hendrik},\n journal={J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={76},\n number={1},\n pages={216--242},\n year={2018},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n@book{rezzolla2013relativistic,\n title={Relativistic Hydrodynamics},\n author={Rezzolla, Luciano and Zanotti, Olindo},\n year={2013},\n publisher={Oxford University Press}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{ruggeri1981convex,\n title={Convex covariant entropy density, symmetric conservative form, and shock waves in relativistic magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={Ruggeri, Tommaso and Strumia, Alberto},\n journal={J. Math. Phys.},\n volume={22},\n number={8},\n pages={1824--1827},\n year={1981},\n publisher={AIP}\n}\n\n\n@article{Rossmanith2006,\n title={An unstaggered, high-resolution constrained transport method for magnetohydrodynamic flows},\n author={Rossmanith, James A},\n journal={SIAM J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={28},\n number={5},\n pages={1766--1797},\n year={2006},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n\n@article{Ryu1998,\n title={A divergence-free upwind code for multidimensional magnetohydrodynamic flows},\n author={Ryu, Dongsu and Miniati, Francesco and Jones, TW and Frank, Adam},\n journal={Astrophys. J.},\n volume={509},\n number={1},\n pages={244--255},\n year={1998},\n publisher={IOP Publishing}\n}\n\n@article{seal2016explicit,\n title={An explicit high-order single-stage single-step positivity-preserving finite difference {WENO} method for the compressible {Euler} equations},\n author={Seal, David C and Tang, Qi and Xu, Zhengfu and Christlieb, Andrew J},\n journal={J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={68},\n number={1},\n pages={171--190},\n year={2016},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n\n@book{serre2000systems,\n title= \"Systems of Conservation Laws. 2. {Geometric} Structures, Oscillations, and Initial-Boundary Value Problems. {Translated} from the 1996 {French} original by {I.N.} {Sneddon}\",\n author= \"Denis Serre\",\n year={2000},\n publisher={Cambridge University Press},\n address={Cambridge, UK}\n}\n\n\n@incollection{shu1998essentially,\n\ttitle={Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws},\n\tauthor={Shu, Chi-Wang},\n\tbooktitle={Advanced numerical approximation of nonlinear hyperbolic equations},\n\tpages={325--432},\n\tyear={1998},\n\tpublisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n@InProceedings{Shu2018,\nauthor=\"Shu, Chi-Wang\",\neditor=\"Klingenberg, Christian\nand Westdickenberg, Michael\",\ntitle=\"Bound-Preserving High-Order Schemes for Hyperbolic Equations: Survey and Recent Developments\",\nbooktitle=\"Theory, Numerics and Applications of Hyperbolic Problems II\",\nyear=\"2018\",\npublisher=\"Springer International Publishing\",\naddress=\"Cham\",\npages=\"591--603\"\n}\n\n\n\n@article{SunShu2019,\n title={Strong Stability of Explicit {Runge--Kutta} Time Discretizations},\n author={Sun, Zheng and Shu, Chi-wang},\n journal={SIAM J. Numer. Anal.},\n volume={57},\n number={3},\n pages={1158--1182},\n year={2019},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n\n@article{tadmor1984skew,\n title={Skew-selfadjoint form for systems of conservation laws},\n author={Tadmor, Eitan},\n journal={J. Math. Anal. Appl.},\n volume={103},\n number={2},\n pages={428--442},\n year={1984},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n@article{tadmor1987numerical,\n title={The numerical viscosity of entropy stable schemes for systems of conservation laws. {I}},\n author={Tadmor, Eitan},\n journal={Math. Comp. },\n volume={49},\n number={179},\n pages={91--103},\n year={1987}\n}\n\n@article{tadmor2002semidiscrete,\n title={From semidiscrete to fully discrete: {Stability} of {Runge-Kutta} schemes by the energy method. {II}},\n author={Tadmor, E},\n journal={Collected lectures on the preservation of stability under discretization},\n volume={109},\n pages={25},\n year={2002}\n}\n\n@article{tadmor2003entropy,\n title={Entropy stability theory for difference approximations of nonlinear conservation laws and related time-dependent problems},\n author={Tadmor, Eitan},\n journal={Acta Numer.},\n volume={12},\n pages={451--512},\n year={2003},\n publisher={Cambridge University Press}\n}\n\n\n@article{TADMOR1986211,\ntitle = \"A minimum entropy principle in the gas dynamics equations\",\njournal = \"Appl. Numer. Math.\",\nvolume = \"2\",\nnumber = \"3\",\npages = \"211--219\",\nyear = \"1986\",\nauthor = \"Eitan Tadmor\"\n}\n\n@article{gouasmi2020minimum,\n title={A minimum entropy principle in the compressible multicomponent {Euler} equations},\n author={Gouasmi, Ayoub and Duraisamy, Karthik and Murman, Scott M and Tadmor, Eitan},\n journal={ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal.},\n volume={54},\n number={2},\n pages={373--389},\n year={2020},\n publisher={EDP Sciences}\n}\t\n\n\n\n\n@article{Torrilhon2005,\n title={Locally divergence-preserving upwind finite volume schemes for magnetohydrodynamic equations},\n author={Torrilhon, Manuel},\n journal={SIAM J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={26},\n number={4},\n pages={1166--1191},\n year={2005},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@article{Torrilhon2004,\n title={Constraint-preserving upwind methods for multidimensional advection equations},\n author={Torrilhon, Manuel and Fey, Michael},\n journal={SIAM J. Numer. Anal.},\n volume={42},\n number={4},\n pages={1694--1728},\n year={2004},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n\n@article{Toth2000,\n title={The {$\\nabla \\cdot {\\bf {B}} = 0$} constraint in shock-capturing magnetohydrodynamics codes},\n author={T{\\'o}th, G{\\'a}bor},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={161},\n number={2},\n pages={605--652},\n year={2000},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n@article{Host:2008,\n title={A multidimensional grid-adaptive relativistic magnetofluid code},\n author={van der Holst, Bart and Keppens, Rony and Meliani, Zakaria},\n journal={Comput. Phys. Commun.},\n volume={179},\n number={9},\n pages={617--627},\n year={2008},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{van1991maxwell,\n title={Maxwell's equations in divergence form for general media with applications to {MHD}},\n author={van Putten, Maurice H.P.M.},\n journal={Commun. Math. Phys.},\n volume={141},\n number={1},\n pages={63--77},\n year={1991},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{van1996knots,\n title={Knots in Simulations of Magnetized Relativistic Jets},\n author={van Putten, Maurice H.P.M.},\n journal={Astrophys. J. Lett.},\n volume={467},\n number={2},\n pages={L57},\n year={1996},\n publisher={IOP Publishing}\n}\n\n@article{van1995two,\n title={A two-dimensional numerical implementation of magnetohydrodynamics in divergence form},\n author={van Putten, Maurice H.P.M.},\n journal={SIAM J. Numer. Anal.},\n volume={32},\n number={5},\n pages={1504--1518},\n year={1995},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@article{van2014extreme,\n title={Extreme luminosities in ejecta produced by intermittent outflows around rotating black holes},\n author={van Putten, Maurice H.P.M.},\n journal={Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.},\n volume={447},\n number={1},\n pages={L11--L15},\n year={2014},\n publisher={Oxford University Press}\n}\n\n@article{maurice1993numerical,\n title={A numerical implementation of {MHD} in divergence form},\n author={van Putten, Maurice H.P.M.},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={105},\n number={2},\n pages={339--353},\n year={1993},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{VILAR2016416,\ntitle = \"Positivity-preserving cell-centered Lagrangian schemes for multi-material compressible flows: {From} first-order to high-orders. {Part II:} The two-dimensional case\",\njournal = \"J. Comput. Phys.\",\nvolume = \"312\",\npages = \"416--442\",\nyear = \"2016\",\nauthor = \"F. Vilar and Chi-Wang Shu and Pierre-Henri Maire\",\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n@article{Waagan2009,\n title={A positive {MUSCL-Hancock} scheme for ideal magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={Waagan, Knut},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={228},\n number={23},\n pages={8609--8626},\n year={2009},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{waagan2011robust,\n title={A robust numerical scheme for highly compressible magnetohydrodynamics: {Nonlinear} stability, implementation and tests},\n author={Waagan, Knut and Federrath, Christoph and Klingenberg, Christian},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={230},\n number={9},\n pages={3331--3351},\n year={2011},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{winters2016affordable,\n title={Affordable, entropy conserving and entropy stable flux functions for the ideal {MHD} equations},\n author={Winters, Andrew R and Gassner, Gregor J},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={304},\n pages={72--108},\n year={2016},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n@article{Wu2017,\n title={Design of provably physical-constraint-preserving methods for general relativistic hydrodynamics},\n author={Wu, Kailiang},\n journal={Phys. Rev. D},\n volume={95},\n number={10},\n eid={103001},\n year={2017},\n publisher={APS}\n}\n\n\n@article{Wu2017a,\n author =\t {K. Wu},\n title =\t {Positivity-preserving analysis of numerical schemes for ideal magnetohydrodynamics},\n journal = {SIAM J. Numer. Anal.},\n\tvolume = {56},\nnumber = {4},\npages = {2124--2147},\n\tyear = {2018}\n }\n\n@article{WuShu2018,\n author =\t {K. Wu and C.-W. Shu},\n title =\t {A provably positive discontinuous {Galerkin} method for multidimensional ideal magnetohydrodynamics},\n journal = {SIAM J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={40},\n number={5},\n pages={B1302--B1329},\n year={2018},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@Article{WuShu2019,\nauthor=\"Wu, Kailiang and Shu, Chi-Wang\",\ntitle=\"Provably positive high-order schemes for ideal magnetohydrodynamics: analysis on general meshes\",\njournal=\"Numer. Math.\",\nyear=\"2019\",\nmonth=\"Aug\",\nday=\"01\",\nvolume=\"142\",\nnumber=\"4\",\npages=\"995--1047\"\n}\n\n@article{WuShu2019SISC,\n title={Entropy symmetrization and high-order accurate entropy stable numerical schemes for relativistic {MHD} equations},\n author={Wu, Kailiang and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={SIAM J. Sci. Comput.},\nvolume = {42},\nnumber = {4},\npages = {A2230--A2261},\nyear = {2020}\n}\n\n\n@article{WuShu2020NumMath,\n title={Provably Physical-Constraint-Preserving Discontinuous {Galerkin} Methods for Multidimensional Relativistic {MHD} Equations},\n author={Wu, Kailiang and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={Numer. Math.},\n year={2021},\n doi={10.1007/s00211-021-01209-4}\n}\n\n\n@article{WuTang2015,\n title={High-order accurate physical-constraints-preserving finite difference {WENO} schemes for special relativistic hydrodynamics},\n author={Wu, Kailiang and Tang, Huazhong},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={298},\n pages={539--564},\n year={2015},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{WuTangM3AS,\n title={Admissible states and physical-constraints-preserving schemes for relativistic magnetohydrodynamic equations},\n author={Wu, Kailiang and Tang, Huazhong},\n journal={Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci.},\n volume={27},\n number={10},\n pages={1871--1928},\n year={2017},\n publisher={World Scientific}\n}\n\n @Article{WuTangZAMP,\n \tauthor=\"Wu, Kailiang\n \tand Tang, Huazhong\",\n \ttitle=\"On physical-constraints-preserving schemes for special relativistic magnetohydrodynamics with a general equation of state\",\n \tjournal=\"Z. Angew. Math. Phys.\",\n \tyear=\"2018\",\n \tmonth=\"May\",\n \tday=\"30\",\n \tvolume=\"69\",\n \tnumber=\"3\",\n \teid=\"84\"\n}\n \t\n\n@article{WuTang2017ApJS,\n title={Physical-constraint-preserving central discontinuous {Galerkin} methods for special relativistic hydrodynamics with a general equation of state},\n author={Wu, Kailiang and Tang, Huazhong},\n journal={Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.},\n volume={228},\n number={1},\n eid={3},\n year={2017},\n publisher={IOP Publishing}\n}\n\n@article{wu2016direct,\n title={A direct {Eulerian} {GRP} scheme for spherically symmetric general relativistic hydrodynamics},\n author={Wu, Kailiang and Tang, Huazhong},\n journal={SIAM J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={38},\n number={3},\n pages={B458--B489},\n year={2016},\n publisher={SIAM}\n}\n\n@article{Xing2010,\n title={Positivity-preserving high order well-balanced discontinuous {Galerkin} methods for the shallow water equations},\n author={Xing, Yulong and Zhang, Xiangxiong and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={Adv. Water Res.},\n volume={33},\n number={12},\n pages={1476--1493},\n year={2010},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{Xiong2016,\n title={Parametrized positivity preserving flux limiters for the high order finite difference {WENO} scheme solving compressible {Euler} equations},\n author={Xiong, Tao and Qiu, Jing-Mei and Xu, Zhengfu},\n journal={J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={67},\n number={3},\n pages={1066--1088},\n year={2016},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{Xu2014,\n title={Parametrized maximum principle preserving flux limiters for high order schemes solving hyperbolic conservation laws: one-dimensional scalar problem},\n author={Xu, Zhengfu},\n journal={Math. Comp. },\n volume={83},\n number={289},\n pages={2213--2238},\n year={2014}\n}\n\n@article{XuLiu2016,\n title={New central and central discontinuous {Galerkin} schemes on overlapping cells of unstructured grids for solving ideal magnetohydrodynamic equations with globally divergence-free magnetic field},\n author={Xu, Zhiliang and Liu, Yingjie},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={327},\n pages={203--224},\n year={2016},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{XuZhang2017,\n title = {Bound-preserving high order schemes},\n author={Z. Xu and X. Zhang},\n booktitle = {Handbook of Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Problems:\n\tApplied and Modern Issues, edited by R. Abgrall and C.-W.\n\tShu},\n volume = 18,\n publisher = {Elsevier},\n address = {North-Holland, Amsterdam},\n year = {2017}\n}\n\n@article{Yakovlev2013,\n title={Locally divergence-free central discontinuous {Galerkin} methods for ideal {MHD} equations},\n author={Yakovlev, Sergey and Xu, Liwei and Li, Fengyan},\n journal={J. Comput. Sci.},\n volume={4},\n number={1-2},\n pages={80--91},\n year={2013},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n@article{zhang2010,\n title={On maximum-principle-satisfying high order schemes for scalar conservation laws},\n author={Zhang, Xiangxiong and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={229},\n number={9},\n pages={3091--3120},\n year={2010},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n@article{zhang2010b,\n title={On positivity-preserving high order discontinuous {Galerkin} schemes for compressible {Euler} equations on rectangular meshes},\n author={Zhang, Xiangxiong and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={229},\n number={23},\n pages={8918--8934},\n year={2010},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n@article{zhang2011,\n title={Positivity-preserving high order discontinuous {Galerkin} schemes for compressible {Euler} equations with source terms},\n author={Zhang, Xiangxiong and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={230},\n number={4},\n pages={1238--1248},\n year={2011},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{zhang2011b,\n title={Maximum-principle-satisfying and positivity-preserving high-order schemes for conservation laws: survey and new developments},\n author={Zhang, Xiangxiong and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={Proc. R. Soc. A},\n volume={467},\n pages={2752--2776},\n year={2011},\n}\n\n@article{zhang2012minimum,\n title={A minimum entropy principle of high order schemes for gas dynamics equations},\n author={Zhang, Xiangxiong and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={Numer. Math.},\n volume={121},\n number={3},\n pages={545--563},\n year={2012},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n@article{ZhaoTang2017,\n title={{Runge-Kutta} discontinuous {Galerkin} methods for the special relativistic magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={Zhao, Jian and Tang, Huazhong},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={343},\n pages={33--72},\n year={2017},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{xu2016divergence,\n title={Divergence-free {WENO} reconstruction-based finite volume scheme for solving ideal {MHD} equations on triangular meshes},\n author={Xu, Z. L. and Balsara, D. S. and Du, H.},\n journal={Commun. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={19},\n number={4},\n pages={841--880},\n year={2016},\n publisher={Cambridge University Press}\n}\n\n@article{ZHANG2017301,\ntitle = \"On positivity-preserving high order discontinuous {Galerkin} schemes for compressible {Navier-Stokes} equations\",\njournal = \"J. Comput. Phys.\",\nvolume = \"328\",\npages = \"301--343\",\nyear = \"2017\",\nauthor = \"Xiangxiong Zhang\"\n}\n\n\n@article{zhang2012maximum,\n title={Maximum-principle-satisfying and positivity-preserving high order discontinuous {Galerkin} schemes for conservation laws on triangular meshes},\n author={Zhang, Xiangxiong and Xia, Yinhua and Shu, Chi-Wang},\n journal={J. Sci. Comput.},\n volume={50},\n number={1},\n pages={29--62},\n year={2012},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{ZouYuDai2019,\n title={A positivity-preserving {Lagrangian} discontinuous {Galerkin} method for ideal magnetohydrodynamics equations in one-dimension},\n author={Zou, Shijun and Yu, Xijun and Dai, Zihuan},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={405},\n pages={109144},\n year={2020},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n\n@article{mocz2016moving,\n title={A moving mesh unstaggered constrained transport scheme for magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={Mocz, Philip and Pakmor, R{\\\"u}diger and Springel, Volker and Vogelsberger, Mark and Marinacci, Federico and Hernquist, Lars},\n journal={Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.},\n volume={463},\n number={1},\n pages={477--488},\n year={2016},\n publisher={The Royal Astronomical Society}\n}\n\n@article{hopkins2015accurate,\n title={Accurate, meshless methods for magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={Hopkins, Philip F and Raives, Matthias J},\n journal={Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.},\n volume={455},\n number={1},\n pages={51--88},\n year={2015},\n publisher={Oxford University Press}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Zanotti2015,\n title={Solving the relativistic magnetohydrodynamics equations with {ADER} discontinuous {Galerkin} methods, a posteriori subcell limiting and adaptive mesh refinement},\n author={Zanotti, Olindo and Fambri, Francesco and Dumbser, Michael},\n journal={Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.},\n volume={452},\n number={3},\n pages={3010--3029},\n year={2015},\n publisher={Oxford University Press}\n}\n\n@book{dafermos2000hyperbolic,\n title={Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Continuum Physics},\n author={Dafermos, C. M.},\n volume={325},\n publisher={Springer},\n edition =\t {4th},\n year={2010}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{POWELL1999284,\ntitle = \"A Solution-Adaptive Upwind Scheme for Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics\",\njournal = \"J. Comput. Phys.\",\nvolume = \"154\",\nnumber = \"2\",\npages = \"284 - 309\",\nyear = \"1999\",\nauthor = \"Kenneth G. Powell and Philip L. Roe and Timur J. Linde and Tamas I. Gombosi and Darren L. De Zeeuw\",\n}\n\n\n\n@article{KUZMIN2020109230,\ntitle = \"Limiting and divergence cleaning for continuous finite element discretizations of the {MHD} equations\",\njournal = \"J. Comput. Phys.\",\npages = \"109230\",\nauthor = \"Dmitri Kuzmin and Nikita Klyushnev\",\nyear = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{radice2011discontinuous,\n title={Discontinuous {Galerkin} methods for general-relativistic hydrodynamics: formulation and application to spherically symmetric spacetimes},\n author={Radice, David and Rezzolla, Luciano},\n journal={Phys. Rev. D},\n volume={84},\n number={2},\n pages={024010},\n year={2011},\n publisher={APS}\n}\n\n@article{he2012adaptive,\n title={An adaptive moving mesh method for two-dimensional relativistic hydrodynamics},\n author={He, Peng and Tang, Huazhong},\n journal={Commun. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={11},\n number={1},\n pages={114--146},\n year={2012},\n publisher={Cambridge University Press}\n}\n\n@article{zhao2013runge,\n title={{Runge--Kutta} discontinuous {Galerkin} methods with {WENO} limiter for the special relativistic hydrodynamics},\n author={Zhao, Jian and Tang, Huazhong},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={242},\n pages={138--168},\n year={2013},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{zanotti2015solving,\n title={Solving the relativistic magnetohydrodynamics equations with {ADER} discontinuous {Galerkin} methods, a posteriori subcell limiting and adaptive mesh refinement},\n author={Zanotti, Olindo and Fambri, Francesco and Dumbser, Michael},\n journal={Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.},\n volume={452},\n number={3},\n pages={3010--3029},\n year={2015},\n publisher={Oxford University Press}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{bugner2016solving,\n title={Solving {3D} relativistic hydrodynamical problems with weighted essentially nonoscillatory discontinuous {Galerkin} methods},\n author={Bugner, Marcus and Dietrich, Tim and Bernuzzi, Sebastiano and Weyhausen, Andreas and Br{\\\"u}gmann, Bernd},\n journal={Phys. Rev. D},\n volume={94},\n number={8},\n pages={084004},\n year={2016},\n publisher={APS}\n}\n\n@article{teukolsky2016formulation,\n title={Formulation of discontinuous {Galerkin} methods for relativistic astrophysics},\n author={Teukolsky, Saul A},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={312},\n pages={333--356},\n year={2016},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{kidder2017spectre,\n\ttitle={{SpECTRE}: A task-based discontinuous {Galerkin} code for relativistic astrophysics},\n\tauthor={Kidder, Lawrence E and Field, Scott E and Foucart, Francois and Schnetter, Erik and Teukolsky, Saul A and Bohn, Andy and Deppe, Nils and Diener, Peter and H{\\'e}bert, Fran{\\c{c}}ois and Lippuner, Jonas and others},\n\tjournal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n\tvolume={335},\n\tpages={84--114},\n\tyear={2017},\n\tpublisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{chen2017second,\n title={Second-order accurate genuine BGK schemes for the ultra-relativistic flow simulations},\n author={Chen, Yaping and Kuang, Yangyu and Tang, Huazhong},\n journal={J. Comput. Phys.},\n volume={349},\n pages={300--327},\n year={2017},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{fambri2018ader,\n title={{ADER} discontinuous {Galerkin} schemes for general-relativistic ideal magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={Fambri, Francesco and Dumbser, Michael and K{\\\"o}ppel, Sven and Rezzolla, Luciano and Zanotti, Olindo},\n journal={Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.},\n volume={477},\n number={4},\n pages={4543--4564},\n year={2018},\n publisher={Oxford University Press}\n}\n\n@article{dunham2019discontinuous,\n title={A Discontinuous {Galerkin} Method for General Relativistic Hydrodynamics in thornado},\n author={Dunham, Samuel and Endeve, Eirik and Mezzacappa, Anthony and Buffaloe, Jesse},\n journal={Bulletin of the American Physical Society},\n volume={64},\n year={2019},\n publisher={APS}\n}\n\n@article{bhoriya2020entropy,\n title={Entropy-stable schemes for relativistic hydrodynamics equations},\n author={Bhoriya, Deepak and Kumar, Harish},\n journal={Z. Angew. Math. Phys.},\n volume={71},\n number={1},\n pages={1--29},\n year={2020},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n@article{mewes2020sphericalnr,\n title={{SphericalNR}: A dynamical spacetime and general relativistic {MHD} evolution framework in spherical coordinates for the {Einstein} {Toolkit}},\n author={Mewes, Vassilios and Zlochower, Yosef and Campanelli, Manuela and Baumgarte, Thomas W and Etienne, Zachariah B and Armengol, Federico G Lopez and Cipolletta, Federico},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.06225},\n year={2020}\n}\n\n\n\n@article{marti2003numerical,\n title={Numerical hydrodynamics in special relativity},\n author={Mart{\\'\\i}, Jos{\\'e} Maria and M{\\\"u}ller, Ewald},\n journal={Living Rev. Relativ.},\n volume={6},\n number={1},\n pages={7},\n year={2003},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{font2008numerical,\n title={Numerical hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics in general relativity},\n author={Font, Jos{\\'e} A},\n journal={Living Reviews in Relativity},\n volume={11},\n number={1},\n pages={7},\n year={2008},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n@article{marti2015grid,\n title={Grid-based methods in relativistic hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics},\n author={Mart{\\'\\i}, Jos{\\'e} Mar{\\'\\i}a and M{\\\"u}ller, Ewald},\n journal={Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics},\n volume={1},\n number={1},\n pages={3},\n year={2015},\n publisher={Springer}\n}\n\n\n@article{zhao2014steger,\n title={{Steger--Warming} flux vector splitting method for special relativistic hydrodynamics},\n author={Zhao, Jian and He, Peng and Tang, Huazhong},\n journal={Math. Methods Appl. Sci.},\n volume={37},\n number={7},\n pages={1003--1018},\n year={2014},\n publisher={Wiley Online Library}\n}\n\n\n@article{mewes2020numerical,\n title={Numerical relativity in spherical coordinates: {A} new dynamical spacetime and general relativistic {MHD} evolution framework for the {Einstein} {Toolkit}},\n author={Mewes, Vassilios and Zlochower, Yosef and Campanelli, Manuela and Baumgarte, Thomas W and Etienne, Zachariah B and Armengol, Federico G Lopez and Cipolletta, Federico},\n journal={Phys. Rev. D},\n volume={101},\n number={10},\n pages={104007},\n year={2020},\n publisher={APS}\n}\n\n\n@Misc{siam,\n key = {zzz},\n title =\t {{SIAM} Style Manual: For journals and books},\n year =\t 2013,\nurl = {https://www.siam.org/journals/pdf/stylemanual.pdf}}\n\n@Misc{Hi14,\n author =\t {Nick Higham},\n title =\t {A Call for Better Indexes},\n howpublished = {SIAM Blogs},\n year =\t 2014,\n month =\t nov,\n url =\t\t {http://blogs.siam.org/a-call-for-better-indexes/},\n urldate =\t {2015-04-05}\n}\n\n@Misc{PeKoPi14,\n title = {Accelerating Community Detection by Using {K}-core Subgraphs},\n author =\t {Chengbin Peng and Tamara G. Kolda and Ali Pinar},\n eprint =\t {1403.2226},\n year =\t 2014,\n month =\t mar,\n eprintclass =\t {math.NA}\n}\n\n\n@Article{WoZhMeSh05,\n author =\t {Woessner, Donald E. and Zhang, Shanrong and\n Merritt, Matthew E. and Sherry, A. Dean},\n title = {Numerical Solution of the {Bloch} Equations Provides Insights \n into the Optimum Design of {PARACEST} Agents for {MRI}},\n journal =\t {Magnetic Resonance in Medicine},\n doi =\t\t {10.1002/mrm.20408},\n volume =\t 53,\n number =\t 4,\n month =\t apr,\n year =\t 2005,\n pages =\t {790--799},\n archiveprefix = {PubMed},\n archive =\t {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed},\n eprint =\t {15799055}\n}\n\n@Article{Ne03,\n title =\t {Properties of Highly Clustered Networks},\n author =\t {Newman, M. E. J.},\n doi =\t\t {10.1103/PhysRevE.68.026121},\n journal =\t {Phys. Rev. E},\n volume =\t {68},\n year =\t {2003},\n eid =\t\t {026121},\n pagetotal =\t 6,\n month =\t aug,\n}\n\n@misc{clawpack,\n title =\t {Clawpack Software},\n author =\t {{Clawpack Development Team}},\n url =\t\t {http://www.clawpack.org},\n urldate =\t {2015/05/14},\n note =\t {Version 5.2.2},\n year =\t 2015\n}\n\n@Misc{AMSMSC2010,\n title =\t {{Mathematics Subject Classification}},\n author =\t {{American Mathematical Society}},\n year =\t {2010},\n url =\t\t {http://www.ams.org/mathscinet/msc/msc2010.html},\n urldate =\t {2015/03/29},\n}\n\n\n@book{La86,\n author =\t \"Leslie Lamport\",\n title =\t \"\\LaTeX: A Document Preparation System\",\n publisher =\t \"Addison--Wesley\",\n year =\t \"1986\",\n address =\t \"Reading, MA\"\n}\n\n@Book{MiGo04,\n author =\t {Frank Mittlebach and Michel Goossens},\n title =\t {The \\LaTeX\\ Companion},\n publisher =\t {Addison--Wesley},\n year =\t 2004,\n edition =\t {2nd}}\n\n@Book{GoVa13,\n author =\t {Golub, Gene H. and Van Loan, Charles F.},\n title =\t {Matrix Computations},\n publisher =\t {The Johns Hopkins University Press},\n address =\t {Baltimore},\n year =\t 2013,\n edition =\t {4th}\n}\n\n\n@Misc{CalcI,\n author =\t {Paul Dawkins},\n title =\t {Paul's Online Math Notes: Calculus {I} --- Notes},\n url = {http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcI/MeanValueTheorem.aspx},\n urldate =\t {2015-07-08}}\n\n@Misc{amsmath,\n author =\t {{American Mathematical Society}},\n title =\t {User's Guide for the \\texttt{amsmath} Package\n (Version 2.0)},\n url =\t\t {ftp://ftp.ams.org/pub/tex/doc/amsmath/amsldoc.pdf},\n urldate =\t {2015-07-30},\n year =\t 2002}\n\n@Misc{shortmath,\n author =\t {Michael Downes},\n title =\t {Short Math Guide for {\\LaTeX}},\n url =\t\t {ftp://ftp.ams.org/pub/tex/doc/amsmath/short-math-guide.pdf},\n urldate =\t {2015-07-30},\n year =\t 2002}\n\n@Misc{pgfplots,\n author =\t {Christian Feuers\\\"anger},\n title =\t {Manual for Package \\texttt{PGFPLOTS}},\n month =\t may,\n year =\t 2015,\n url =\t\t {http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgfplots}\n}\n\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091193,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31993"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31993"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Arpit Bahety"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Arnav Balaji, Arpit Bahety, Sriniket Ambatipudi, Daniel Lam, Junhong Xu, Roberto Mart\\'in-Mart\\'in"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"OopsieVerse: A Safety Benchmark with Damage-Aware Simulation for Robot Manipulation"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"Project website: https://robin-lab.cs.utexas.edu/oopsieverse/. The first two authors contributed equally; order decided by dice roll. Accepted to Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS 2026)"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cs.RO"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"While robotic manipulation capabilities have advanced rapidly, physical safety remains a major barrier to deploying household robots: task success is insufficient if the robot damages itself or its surroundings. Simulation offers a harm-free alternative to costly and dangerous real-world training and evaluation, yet existing simulators lack general mechanisms to detect, quantify, and represent damage. To address this gap, we introduce OOPSIEVERSE, a unified simulation framework and benchmark for damage-aware household manipulation. OOPSIEVERSE provides damage as an explicit, physically-grounded, and taskagnostic signal by converting sources such as contact forces, temperature changes, and liquid interactions into corresponding mechanical, thermal or fluid damage. OOPSIEVERSE comprises two core elements: (1) DAMAGESIM, a simulator-agnostic framework for detecting and quantifying damage during navigation and manipulation, and (2) a suite of household tasks designed to evaluate common damage modes and distinguish between task completion and safe execution. We demonstrate the generality of our framework by instantiating DAMAGESIM in two simulators with different physics backends, OmniGibson (Nvidia Omniverse) and RoboCasa (MuJoCo). We further showcase the utility of OOPSIEVERSE across multiple use cases, including (1) guiding safer demonstration collection via real-time damage feedback, (2) learning safer manipulation policies through damage-conditioned imitation learning and reinforcement learning, (3) benchmarking the safety of state-of-the-art Vision Language Action policies, and (4) improving real-world safety of sim-to-real transferred policies. Together, our results highlight the potential of OOPSIEVERSE as an open-source foundation for systematic, scalable research on safe robot manipulation. For code and more information, please refer to https://robin-lab.cs.utexas.edu/oopsieverse/"},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:30:05 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:30:05 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Balaji","Arnav",""],["Bahety","Arpit",""],["Ambatipudi","Sriniket",""],["Lam","Daniel",""],["Xu","Junhong",""],["Martín-Martín","Roberto",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Balaji\",\n \"Arnav\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Bahety\",\n \"Arpit\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Ambatipudi\",\n \"Sriniket\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Lam\",\n \"Daniel\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Xu\",\n \"Junhong\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Martín-Martín\",\n \"Roberto\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: 00-abstract.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{abstract}\nWhile robotic manipulation capabilities have advanced rapidly, physical safety remains a major barrier to deploying household robots: task success is insufficient if the robot damages itself or its surroundings.\nSimulation offers a harm-free alternative to costly and dangerous real-world training and evaluation, yet existing simulators lack general mechanisms to detect, quantify, and represent damage.\nTo address this gap, we introduce \\methodname{}, a unified simulation framework and benchmark for damage-aware household manipulation. \nAt a theoretical level, \\methodname{} augments an existing Markov Decision Problem with additional damage-related observations, rewards and/or termination conditions based on user preferences.\n%To do that,\n\\methodname{} provides damage as an explicit, physically-grounded, and task-agnostic signal by converting sources such as contact forces, temperature changes, and liquid interactions into corresponding mechanical, thermal or fluid damage. \n\\methodname{} comprises two core elements: (1) \\simname{}, a simulator-agnostic framework for detecting and quantifying damage during navigation and manipulation, and (2) a suite of household tasks designed to evaluate common damage modes and distinguish between task completion and safe execution.\nWe demonstrate the generality of our framework by instantiating \\simname{} in two simulators with different physics backends, OmniGibson (Nvidia Omniverse) and RoboCasa (MuJoCo). \nWe further showcase the utility of \\methodname{} across multiple use cases, including (1) guiding safer demonstration collection via real-time damage feedback, (2) learning safer manipulation policies through damage-conditioned imitation learning and reinforcement learning, (3) benchmarking the safety of state-of-the-art Vision Language Action policies, and (4) improving real-world safety of sim-to-real transferred policies.\nTogether, our results highlight the potential of \\methodname{} as an open-source foundation for systematic, scalable research on safe robot manipulation.\nFor code and additional information, please refer to \\url{https://robin-lab.cs.utexas.edu/oopsieverse/}\n\n\n% \\url{https:\\\\oopsiverse-anon.github.io}.\n% Progress toward safe real-world robots requires not only methods for learning safe policies, but also principled ways to evaluate the safety of robot behavior. This calls for a unified framework and benchmark that capture the safety challenges faced by generalist robots performing everyday tasks. We introduce \\methodname{}, a simulation framework and benchmark for safety-aware robot learning in household manipulation settings. \\methodname{} provides two core contributions: (1) \\frameworkname{}, a general, simulator-agnostic framework for detecting and modeling diverse forms of damage that arise in real-world manipulation, and (2) a suite of household tasks explicitly designed to expose the gap between goal completion and safe execution. Through extensive experiments, we evaluate the safety properties of state-of-the-art vision–language–action models, demonstrate how the framework enables learning safer policies via imitation and reinforcement learning, and show that policies trained with our safety signals transfer to safer behavior on real robots.\n\n% Simulation tools and benchmarks are increasingly used to train and evaluate robot policies for complex manipulation tasks, with the goal of transferring learned policies to the real world. Yet current simulators define task success purely in terms of goal achievement and lack a general mechanism for measuring safety. This leads both training and evaluation pipelines to overlook behaviors that would be dangerous in reality. \n% To address this gap, we introduce \\methodname{}, a benchmark for safety-aware robot learning in household manipulation settings. \\methodname{} consists of two core contributions: (1) \\frameworkname{}, a general framework for damage detection in manipulation scenarios, modeling multiple forms of damage experienced in the real world, and (2) a suite of household manipulation tasks designed to highlight the distinction between goal-achieving yet unsafe behavior and truly safe task execution. We demonstrate the generality of our design by implementing \\methodname{} in two simulators, OmniGibson and RoboCasa. \n% These contributions give researchers a systematic way to train and evaluate manipulation policies not only for performance but also for safety. We show in our experiments that policies trained using our damage-detection framework learn safer strategies and pose substantially lower risk to their surroundings compared to policies trained without them.\n\n% 1. To truly make progres in safe robots in the real world we need a way to train safe policies and evaluate the safety of different methods. \n% 2. For this we need a framework and a benchmark that can help evaluate safety on tasks that a generalist robot would perform in the real world\n% 3. To enable this, we propose \\methodname, a simulation framework and benchmark for safety-aware robot learning in household manipulation settings. \n% 4. SAFEMANIBENCH consists of two core contributions: (1) DAMAGESIM, a general framework for damage detection in manipulation scenarios, that can be wrapped over any simulator, modeling multiple forms of damage experienced in the real world, and (2) a suite of household manipulation tasks designed to highlight the distinction between goal-achieving yet unsafe behavior and truly safe task execution\n% 5. Through our extensive experimentation, we show the how safe are SOTA VLAs, how can we leverage this framework for learning safer policies via IL or RL and also show that policies trained based on our framework act safely in the real world.\n\n% We show in our experiments, across teleoperation, imitation learning, and reinforcement learning settings, that policies trained with damage-based safety metrics learn safer strategies and pose substantially lower risk to their surroundings compared to policies trained without them.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n================================================\nFILE: 01-intro.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Introduction}\n\\label{s:intro}\n\nA central goal of robotics is to build capable assistants that can solve complex manipulation tasks in real-world environments. \nHowever, training and evaluating such systems directly in the physical world is difficult, expensive, and potentially unsafe, particularly when interactions involve damageable objects or the robot itself.\nSimulation is therefore widely used as a safe alternative, enabling learning and evaluation without real-world consequences.\nHowever, this safety is largely artificial: most simulators do not model or measure the damage that would result from unsafe interactions in the real world.\nAs a result, manipulation benchmarks typically define success solely in terms of goal completion, making no distinction between behaviors that would be benign in the real world and those that would succeed only by causing damage.\nPolicies trained or evaluated under this abstraction may therefore appear successful in simulation while relying on behaviors that would be unsafe or destructive when deployed (see Fig.~\\ref{fig:pull_fig}); avoiding such behaviors requires task-specific reward shaping or hand-designed constraints that are brittle and difficult to scale across diverse environments and damage sources.\n\n% Nevertheless, existing simulators do not provide general mechanism for measuring safety during task execution, and benchmarks for manipulation define success solely based on goal achievement.\n% As a result, there is often no clear distinction between trajectories that are safe and those that achieve the goal while causing damage; avoiding unsafe behaviors requires manual reward shaping or hand-designed constraints that are task-specific, brittle, and difficult to scale across diverse environments and failure sources.\n\n% However, task success alone is not sufficient. We also want robots to act in ways that are safe for both themselves and their surroundings. \n% Unfortunately, most simulators and benchmarks define success purely in terms of goal achievement and provide no general mechanism for measuring safety during task execution. As a result, there is often no clear distinction between trajectories that are safe and those that achieve the goal while causing damage. In practice, avoiding such behaviors typically requires manual reward shaping or hand-designed constraints, which are task-specific, brittle, and difficult to scale across diverse environments and failure modes.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{Figures/pull_fig.pdf}\n % https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/16qQYgGK1DvIwkqOfoQM06lGbQCRklBGpRXsTv_M6yzo/edit\n \\caption{\\textit{Oops, did I do that?} \n Robots trained and evaluated in simulation are unaware of the real-world damage their actions would cause, such as applying excessive forces, heating or freezing inappropriate objects, or spilling water on delicate items.\n \\methodname{} addresses this gap by providing DamageSim, a general damage-aware simulation framework, including a plugin for multiple simulators (instantiated in Omniverse and MuJoCo) and OopsieBench, a benchmark of 32 household manipulation tasks for evaluating and developing safe robotic solutions.\n }\n \\label{fig:pull_fig}\n\\end{figure}\n\nIn this work, we introduce \\methodname{}, a simulation framework for safety-aware robotics in household manipulation settings. \nOur framework enables training and systematic evaluation of safety by explicitly modeling damage incurred during task execution. \\methodname{} consists of two core components:\n\\simname{} and \\benchname{}. \n\nFirst, \\simname{} is a damage detection plugin for object-centric detection, tracking and quantification of damage in manipulation and navigation tasks in household domains.\n\\simname{} models the three most common object and robot damage sources in this domain (see Fig.~\\ref{fig:damages}): 1) \\textit{mechanical damage}, produced by excessive forces due to impact and drops, or excessive compression or tension that deform or break objects, 2) \\textit{thermal damage}, arising from exposure to extreme temperatures, such as contact with hot surfaces, flames, or freezing temperatures, and 3) \\textit{fluid damage}, produced from contact between liquids and objects that cause corrosion, or short-circuit electronics. For each damage source, \\simname{} continuously computes a unified damage value based on the simulator state (e.g., contact forces, temperatures, and liquid interactions) and object-dependent characteristics and tracks it in an object-centric \\textit{health} value. \nThis provides a task-agnostic safety signal that can be applied uniformly across environments, tasks, objects and robots.\nSignificantly, \\simname{} is not bounded to a specific simulator: we provide as part of \\methodname{} implementations of \\simname{} in Behavior-1K/OmniGibson~\\cite{li2024behavior1khumancenteredembodiedai} (based on Nvidia's Omniverse~\\cite{nvidia_omniverse_dev_overview}) and RoboCasa/Robosuite~\\cite{nasiriany2024robocasa,zhu2025robosuitemodularsimulationframework} (based on DeepMind's MuJoCo~\\cite{todorov2012mujoco}).\n\nSecond, \\benchname{} is a suite of 32 ready-to-use household manipulation tasks designed to expose the distinction between goal achievement and safe execution measurable thanks to \\simname{}. \nThe tasks span diverse scenes, objects, and interaction patterns, and include both short-horizon settings that isolate individual damage modalities and longer-horizon scenarios that require sustained safety-aware decision making. \nEach task admits multiple solution strategies, including unsafe goal-achieving shortcuts and alternative strategies that complete the objective without causing harm, enabling systematic evaluation of safety--performance trade-offs.\nWe include a dataset of human-collected demonstrations as part of the benchmark.\nAs \\simname{}, \\benchname{} is cross-platform, including 17 tasks defined in OmniGibson and 15 tasks in RoboCasa. We believe this will broaden the accessibility to our work.\n\n% To demonstrate that these design choices are not tied to a single simulator, we implement \\methodname{} in two simulators with fundamentally different architectures: OmniGibson and RoboCasa. RoboCasa is built on a MuJoCo-based pipeline, while OmniGibson is built on NVIDIA Isaac Sim. Despite these differences in physics engines and simulator design, we are able to apply the same damage-detection framework and task abstractions across both platforms without modifying the core formulation.\n\nTo demonstrate the wide range of uses of \\methodname{}, we evaluate it across a range of learning and data-generation settings. \nFirst, we integrate live damage feedback in a teleoperation interface and show that it leads to significantly safer human demonstrations for several \\benchname{} tasks. \nSecond, we train safe imitation learning policies by using the damage feedback from \\simname{} to discourage using unsafer samples during the training process. \nThird, we use \\methodname{} to develop a damage-aware reinforcement learning procedure that reduces damage, demonstrating the utility of our framework as universal safety reward. \nFinally, we evaluate some of the learned policies in the real world demonstrating the safer behaviors obtained thanks to \\methodname{}.\n\\methodname{}, with \\simname{} and \\benchname{}, provides a general, practical, and scalable way to train and evaluate manipulation policies not only for task completion, but also for safety and we hope this tool facilitates research in this area.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: 02-related.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Related Work}\n\\label{s:rw}\n\n% Missing works:\n% sections: 1. safety in robotics\n% 2. safety benchmarks in robotics\n% 1. Datasets and Benchmarks for Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning\n% 2. SafeVLA\n% 3. RobusGymnasium\n% Mention 1 sentence about sim frameowkrs/benchmarks in autonomous driving?\n\n\\textbf{Safety in Robotics.} Safety has long been a central concern in robotics, with early approaches grounded in control theory and reachability analysis, including control barrier functions, Hamiltonian methods, and related formulations~\\cite{mitchell2005time,tomlin2002conflict,ames2016control,ames2019control}. \nThese methods provide strong safety guarantees but require explicit definitions of safe and unsafe states and accurate system models, making them difficult to scale to complex, contact-rich manipulation scenarios~\\cite{blanchini1999set}.\n\nMore recent learning-based approaches aim to incorporate safety through learned reachability, value functions, recovery policies, or constraints that steer agents away from unsafe regions~\\cite{berkenkamp2017safe,dalal2018safe,thananjeyan2021recovery,brunke2025semanticallysaferobotmanipulation,ni2025dontletrobotharmful,bahety2025safemimic,Nakamura_2025}. \nWhile effective in specific settings, these methods typically rely on hand-designed unsafe scenarios or task-specific cost functions, limiting their generality and making cross-task evaluation challenging~\\cite{garcia2015survey}. \n\\methodname{} is inspired by these approaches but targets a complementary goal: providing standardized environments and physically grounded damage models where such methods can be trained and evaluated consistently.\n\n% Since the early days, robotics has been concerned with the safety of their solutions~\\cite{}.\n% Initial methods to evaluate safety were rooted in control theory and controllability of controllers~\\cite{}, based on reachability through control barrier functions, Hamiltonians and similar concepts~\\cite{}.\n% A limitation of these approaches is in that they require a predefinition of what states are safe and which ones are not, and clear dynamic models, demanding a high level of engineering and state observability.\n\n% Recent learning approaches have relaxed these limitations by learning these spaces or features that represent them~\\cite{}.\n% A different family of approaches provide safety in the form of learned structures like safety value functions~\\cite{} or recovery policies~\\cite{} to steer the robot away from danger.\n% While these approaches\n% inspire the damage sources and scenarios of \\methodname{}, their development required costly hand-defining individual unsafe and damaging scenarios: The goal of \\methodname{} is to complement these approaches, by providing standardized environments and damage models where such safe manipulation methods can be evaluated on.\n% focus on\n% algorithmic safety mechanisms for specific tasks rather than defining a\n% task-agnostic benchmark with scalable damage metrics.\n% The goal of \\methodname{} is to complement these approaches, by providing standardized environments and damage models where such safe manipulation methods can be evaluated on.\n\n% Several works address safety in robotic manipulation.\n% Brunke et al.\\ propose a semantic safety filter that combines scene\n% understanding with control barrier functions to enforce constraints such as\n% ``do not move a cup of water over a laptop'' or ``avoid unsafe object\n% poses''~\\cite{brunke2025semanticallysaferobotmanipulation}. Ni et al.\\ introduce\n% responsible robotic manipulation, using imagined world-model rollouts and a\n% ``safety-as-policy'' formulation to avoid hazardous outcomes such as fires,\n% poisoning, or explosions while following natural-language\n% instructions~\\cite{ni2025dontletrobotharmful}. Ak et al.\\ learn failure\n% prevention skills that sit on top of base manipulation skills, explicitly\n% targeting failure modes such as sliding, overturning, or spilling during\n% everyday tasks~\\cite{ak2023learningfailurepreventionskills}. These approaches\n% inspire several of the failure scenarios in \\methodname{}, such as avoiding water\n% over electronics or heating plastic on a stove, but they focus on\n% algorithmic safety mechanisms for specific tasks rather than defining a\n% task-agnostic benchmark with scalable damage metrics.\n% The goal of \\methodname{} is to complement these approaches, by providing standardized environments and damage models where such safe manipulation methods can be evaluated on.\n\n\\textbf{Safety Benchmarks.} Several benchmarks have been proposed to study safe reinforcement learning. \nSafety Gym and its successor Safety-Gymnasium encode safety through constraint costs such as collisions or proximity to obstacles, focusing primarily on `navigation and low-dimensional control tasks\\cite{ray2019benchmarking,ji2023safety}. \nSimilarly, safe-control-gym and GUARD standardize constrained RL problems across classic control domains~\\cite{yuan2022safe,zhao2023guard}, while AI Safety Gridworlds study abstract safety failures such as reward hacking in discrete environments~\\cite{leike2017aisafetygridworlds}. \nDSRL introduces a platform tailored for offline safe reinforcement learning~\\cite{liu2023datasetsbenchmarksofflinesafe} and ReDMan designs a benchmark for safe dexterous manipulation~\\cite{redman}.\nHASARD introduces a vision-based safe RL benchmark built on the game DOOM, with scalar safety costs for hazards such as lava~\\cite{tomilin2025hasard}. \nWhile valuable for theoretical and algorithmic study, these benchmarks express safety through task-specific constraints or abstract costs rather than explicit models of physical damage.\n\n% A few subfields in robotics have developed specific simulation benchmarks to evaluate and train safety solutions.\n% Autonomous driving is a well defined domain with clear rules and safety boundaries.\n% Moreover, its close-to-deployment state has prompted the appearance of simulation benchmarks to evaluate the safety of their solutions~\\cite{}.\n% However, given the differences between autonomous driving and household manipulation, the principles used in this domain are hardly exportable to safe manipulation.\n% Another domain that has historically looked at safety is the Reinforcement Learning (RL) community because \\roberto{finish this}.\n% Benchmarks like OpenAI's Safety Gym~\\cite{} and its extension Safety-Gymnasium~\\cite{ji2024safetygymnasiumunifiedsafereinforcement}\n% \\textbf{Benchmarking Safety in Robot Learning}\n% Existing approaches have introduced benchmarks for safe reinforcement learning. Safety-Gymnasium~\\cite{ji2024safetygymnasiumunifiedsafereinforcement} extends\n% OpenAI's Safety Gym with additional \n% provide environments and safety RL algorithms, focusing primarily on navigation and a few manipulation tasks. \n% Safety is encoded through constraint costs such as collision penalties and distances to obstacles,\n% rather than explicit models of physical damage. Similarly, safe-control-gym~\\cite{yuan2022safecontrolgymunifiedbenchmarksuite} provides a unified suite of classic control problems with state and input constraints for safety evaluation, and GUARD~\\cite{zhao2024guardsafereinforcementlearning} offers a generalized benchmark that standardizes constrained RL tasks and algorithms across a variety of low-dimensional environments. \n% AI Safety Gridworlds~\\cite{leike2017aisafetygridworlds}\n% presents a set of 2D grid environments that instantiate abstract safety\n% challenges such as side effects and reward hacking. \n% More recently, HASARD~\\cite{tomilin2025hasardbenchmarkvisionbasedsafe} introduces a vision-based safe RL benchmark built on the game DOOM, with egocentric pixel inputs and scalar safety costs for hazards such as lava and harming neutrals. \n% While these benchmarks are valuable for the theoretical study of Safe-RL algorithms, they largely focus on navigation or specific control tasks and express safety through task-specific constraints; there is a need for a benchmark that can generalize to common household manipulation tasks.\n% % general object-level physical damage as in \\methodname{}. \n% \\roberto{reduce the above. too many single benchmark analysis. group in families and extract general ideas. Contrast to ours}\n\n% To evaluate the development and performance of household robots in simulation, the community has developed benchmarks such as BEHAVIOR-1K~\\cite{li2024behavior1khumancenteredembodiedai}, and RoboCasa~\\cite{}. \n% They provide large-scale suites of realistic household tasks on top of simulator like OmniGibson-Omniverse and MuJoCo. \n% These benchmarks emphasize long-horizon mobile manipulation and human-centered activities, but they do not provide a general, reusable notion of safety: task success is defined purely in terms of goal achievement, and any safety considerations must be encoded individually and manually in task-specific rewards or termination conditions. \n% With \\methodname{} we provide a plugin that can be complement existing household simulation benchmarks and provide a unified, physics-grounded notion of damage that is shared across tasks, objects, and robots.\n\nIn the context of household manipulation, large-scale simulation benchmarks such as BEHAVIOR-1K~\\cite{li2024behavior1khumancenteredembodiedai} and RoboCasa~\\cite{nasiriany2024robocasa} provide diverse, realistic tasks built on simulators like OmniGibson and MuJoCo~\\cite{todorov2012mujoco}. \nThese benchmarks emphasize long-horizon manipulation and human-centric activities but define success purely in terms of goal completion; safety considerations must be encoded manually via rewards or termination conditions. \nIn contrast, \\methodname{} through the plugin \\simname{} augments such environments with a reusable, physics-grounded notion of damage that distinguishes safe from unsafe task execution independent of task success.\n\nOverall, \\methodname{}, with its simulation plugin \\simname{} and associated benchmark of safety household tasks \\benchname{}, complements existing safe learning methods and simulation benchmarks by providing a unified framework that exposes the physical consequences of actions through measurable damage signals, enabling scalable evaluation and development of safety-aware manipulation policies.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{Figures/fig2oopsie.pdf}\n % TODO: Get the source file for this figure\n \\caption{\\textbf{Damage-Augmented POMDP Implementation with \\simname{} in \\methodname{}}. Conceptually, our \\simname{} plugin (\\textit{blue}) extends an existing POMDPs in simulation (\\textit{green}, dotted arrow to agent) by augmenting the state with \\textit{health}. \n The health state can in turn influence the observations and rewards, and/or provide access to new damage-aware terminal states. \n \\simname{} implements the health state to augment the original POMDP state into a \\textit{Damage Aware} steate ($s^\\textrm{DA}\\in\\mathcal{S}^\\textrm{DA}=\\mathcal{S}\\times\\mathcal{S}^\\textrm{h}$) as a per-object object physical property, updated at every timestep by a set of \\textit{damage evaluator models (DEM)} that compute mechanical, thermal, and fluid damage ($d_\\textrm{DEM}$) from simulator state and interactions, reducing per-entity health accordingly. \n The augmented POMDP provided by \\simname{} approximates better the conditions of the real-world task.\n }\n \\label{fig:method_overview}\n\\end{figure}\n\n% \\subsection{Safety in Robot Manipulation}\n\n\\input{fig-damages}\n\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: 03a-simulator.tex\n================================================\n\\section{\\simname{}}\n\\label{s:damagesim}\n\n% TODO: Add references for grounding our mech damage in eixsitng works\n\nIn this section we introduce \\simname{}, our simulation-based damage evaluation framework. After introducing our conceptual framing for a damage-aware POMDP formulation, we describe how we compute mechanical, thermal, and fluid damage signals from the simulator.\n\n\\subsection{Damage-Aware POMDP Formulation}\n\nRobotic tasks can be formulated as Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDP)~\\cite{Kaelbling1998PlanningAA} defined by the tuple $\\mathcal{M}=(\\mathcal{S}, \\mathcal{A}, \\mathcal{T}, \\mathcal{R}, \\Omega, \\mathcal{O}, \\gamma)$, where $s \\in \\mathcal{S}$ is the state space, $a \\in \\mathcal{A}$ the action space, $\\mathcal{T}(s' \\mid s, a)$ the transition function, $\\mathcal{R}(s, a)$ the reward function, $o \\in \\Omega$ the observation space, $\\mathcal{O}(o \\mid s)$ the observation function, and $\\gamma \\in [0,1)$ the discount factor.\nIn most existing simulators, this POMDP is specified purely in a task-completion-centric manner: the state, reward, and termination conditions only reflect whether the task has been completed. However, this neglects a common characteristic of the real world problems: to be correctly completed, the agent should avoid damaging the objects and itself when completing the task~\\cite{arnold2017value}.\nBy omitting such damage considerations from the state, the resulting behaviors in simulation may seem successful, while leading to dangers that cannot be executed in the real world.\n\nTo address this divergence between sim and real, we propose a damage-aware POMDP $\\mathcal{M}^\\textrm{DA}$, an augmentation of the original simulation POMDP that explicitly includes a \\emph{health} state, $h\\in \\mathcal{S}^h$, enabling the approximation of damage-inducing processes absent in existing simulators (see Fig.~\\ref{fig:method_overview}).\nIn the damage-aware POMDP, $\\mathcal{M}^\\textrm{DA}$, the health-augmented state space, $s^\\textrm{DA} \\in \\mathcal{S}^\\textrm{DA}=\\mathcal{S}\\times\\mathcal{S}^\\textrm{h}$, can serve as basis to generate new damage-aware elements for other components of the POMDP ---the observations, the termination conditions, the reward---, better approximating the real-world task.\n\nIn the following, we describe how this damage-aware POMDP is instantiated in practice through our \\simname{} plugin, and how object health is computed by tracking and updating damage based on physically grounded interaction signals.\n\n\\subsection{Damage-Aware POMDP Implementation: \\textls[-45]{\\textsc{DamageSim}}}\n\nWhile existing specialized simulators can compute complex damage such as fracture mechanics~\\cite{Anderson2017FractureMechanics} or thermal effects, they rely on ad-hoc physical computation and detailed material properties, far from what existing robotics simulators provide.\nOur goal in \\simname{} is instead to expose a portable, physically grounded, task-agnostic signal that \\textit{approximates} real-world damage, can be computed based on common values provided by robotics simulators (forces, motion,\\ldots), and can be used consistently for evaluation and learning. \nTo achieve this goal, we represent damage through an explicit, unifying ``health'' state, an additional object-centric state variable that keeps the original task dynamics intact while still modeling the irreversible consequences of unsafe interactions.\nHealth is tracked for each object and the robot by aggregating and accumulating damage in their composing links caused by different sources such as mechanical, thermal, and fluid elements.\n\nConcretely, we assume the simulated scene contains multiple objects, $\\mathcal{E}=\\{e_1,\\ldots,e_N\\}$, each one composed of one or multiple links, $(l_1\\ldots,l_M)$, whose common physical state (pose, velocity, forces acting on it through contact, etc.) $s_{e_i}^{l_j}$, can be retrieved from an underlying physics simulator.\nTo augment this state, we keep track of the health of each link of an object, $h_{e_i}^{l_j}$, and associate an object health to the minimum health of its links, $h_{e_i} = \\min(h_{e_i}^{l_1}, \\ldots, h_{e_i}^{l_M})$. \nThis provides a semantically meaningful health understanding: an object (or the robot) is fully damaged when one or more of its links are fully damaged.\nWe rank health to range between a maximum value, $h_{MAX}$ (completely undamaged), and $0$ (completely damaged) for all objects and links, and use a unifying scale for all objects ($h_{MAX}=100$) that enables easy comparisons of health state.\nThe overall environment health state at time $t$ is given by: $h_t = \\{h_{e_1},\\ldots,h_{e_N}\\}$.\nThe link health values are updated using a set of $k$ \\textit{Damage Evaluation Models} (DEM).\nEach DEM models a specific source of physical damage (e.g., mechanical damage, thermal damage, etc.) using the current simulator state, $s_t$, to output a damage value $d_{DEM_k}$. The aggregated damage value across all DEMs represents the decrease in the object’s health:\n$h_{e_i}(t)=h_{e_i}(t-1)-\\sum_{k} d_{DEM_k}(t)$.\n\n\\textbf{Mechanical Damage Evaluation Model:}\nMechanical damage captures contact-induced harm that leads to undesired effects such as cracking, deformation, or breakage. \nIn household manipulation, such damage typically arises from two classes of interactions: i) \\emph{impulsive} events that causes rapid changes in an object's motion (e.g., collisions or drops), and ii) \\emph{sustained} or \\emph{constrained} contacts in which large forces are applied with little or no acceleration (e.g., compressing, stretching, or pushing against a fixed surface). \nWhile these regimes can be characterized using detailed physical quantities --such as momentum change or structure load analysis-- computing them accurately is computationally expensive and unnecessary for distinguishing safe from unsafe behaviors.\nInstead, we approximate both regimes using a unified proxy derived from states available in standard robotics physics simulators, producing health-reducing effects that are qualitatively consistent with real-world object degradation.\n\nComputing the effect of impulsive vs. constrained/sustained forces requires understanding the kinematic (motion) nature of the links.\nFor each link, at each physics step $t$, we obtain from the physics simulator the set of contact forces acting on the link, $\\{\\mathbf{f}_{1}(t), \\ldots, \\mathbf{f}_{K}(t)\\}$, and the link's kinematic information, which includes the link acceleration, $\\mathbf{a}(t)$ (in the following, we drop the link suffixes for readability). \nWe can then decompose each contact force, $\\mathbf{f}_{k}(t)$, into components parallel and orthogonal to the direction of acceleration $\\hat{\\mathbf{a}}(t)$: $\\mathbf{f}_{\\parallel,k}(t) = (\\mathbf{f}_{k}(t)\\!\\cdot\\!\\hat{\\mathbf{a}}(t))\\,\\hat{\\mathbf{a}}(t)$ and $\\mathbf{f}_{\\perp,k}(t) = \\mathbf{f}_{k}(t) - \\mathbf{f}_{\\parallel,k}(t)$, and aggregate them across contact points:\n\\[\nF_{\\parallel}(t) = \\sum_k \\|\\mathbf{f}_{\\parallel,k}(t)\\|,\n\\qquad\nF_{\\perp}(t) = \\sum_k \\|\\mathbf{f}_{\\perp,k}(t)\\|.\n\\]\nIntuitively, $F_{\\parallel}(t)$ captures contact aligned with the change in motion (impulsive interactions), while $F_{\\perp}(t)$ captures the remaining contact that is not aligned with it (i.e., sustained/constrained loading). \n\nInspired by the materials physics, we approximate the effective mechanical load acting on the link as\n$\\varepsilon_{\\text{mech}}(t) = \\alpha\\,F_{\\parallel}(t) + \\beta\\,F_{\\perp}(t)$, where $\\alpha$ and $\\beta$ are user-specified coefficients that control sensitivity to sustained versus impulsive loading~\\cite{johnson1987contact}. For example, a paper cup typically deforms more easily under sustained compressive loading (e.g., squeezing or crushing) than under brief impulsive contact (e.g., dropping it).\nFinally, \\simname{} models the incremental mechanical damage at time $t$ as\n\\[\nd_{\\text{mech}}(t)=\\Lambda_{\\text{mech}}\\max\\!\\big(\\varepsilon_{\\text{mech}}(t)-\\mathcal{E}_{\\text{mech}},\\,0\\big),\n\\]\nwhere $\\mathcal{E}_{\\text{mech}}$ represents a minimal load threshold analogous to a material's yield or fracture limit~\\cite{Anderson2017FractureMechanics}, and $\\Lambda_{\\text{mech}}$ scales the rate at which damage accumulates beyond this threshold~\\cite{callister2020materials}. \nBoth parameters can be specified per link to reflect material properties: brittle (fragile) objects are modeled with lower thresholds and higher damage scaling, while ductile objects use larger threshold and lower scaling.\nFig.~\\ref{fig:damages} a), b) and c) depict common cases of mechanical damages due to impact, compression and tension obtained by our mechanical damage evaluation model.\n\n\\textbf{Thermal Damage Evaluation Model:}\nThermal damage captures harm from exposure to temperatures outside an object's safe operating range (e.g., melting, burning, or freeze damage). \nModeling damage due to thermal harm is thus only possible in simulators that keep track of temperature and heat/cold sources. \nTherefore, while our model is object-centric and general, we provide an implementation of the thermal damage evaluation model of \\simname{} only in OmniGibson~\\cite{li2024behavior1khumancenteredembodiedai}, which provides the necessary temperature readings.\n\nSimilar to our mechanical damage evaluation model, our thermal evaluation model evaluates if the temperature of an object goes over/under physically grounded thresholds and scales the damage according to material properties.\nAt each timestep $t$, we retrieve the object temperature (OmniGibson provides only temperature per object, not link), $T(t)$, from the underlying physics simulator. Thermal damage is then modeled in \\simname{} as: \n\\[\nd_{\\text{therm}}(t)\n=\n\\begin{cases}\n\\Lambda_{\\text{hot}}\\bigl(T(t) - \\mathcal{T}_{\\text{hot}}\\bigr), & T(t) > \\mathcal{T}_{\\text{hot}}, \\\\[4pt]\n\\Lambda_{\\text{cold}}\\bigl(\\mathcal{T}_{\\text{cold}} - T(t)\\bigr), & T(t) < \\mathcal{T}_{\\text{cold}}, \\\\[4pt]\n0, & \\text{otherwise,}\n\\end{cases}\n\\]\nwhere the thresholds $(\\mathcal{T}_{\\text{hot}}, \\mathcal{T}_{\\text{cold}})$ specify the range of tolerated temperatures, and $(\\Lambda_{\\text{hot}}, \\Lambda_{\\text{cold}})$ indicate how quickly damage accumulates beyond the range based on material properties, e.g., cookware exhibits high $\\mathcal{T}_{\\text{hot}}$ and/or small $\\Lambda_{\\text{hot}}$, while burnable plastic items like toys are defined with a lower $\\mathcal{T}_{\\text{hot}}$ and larger $\\Lambda_{\\text{hot}}$.\nBoth thresholds can be made very large positive/negative values to indicate that an object cannot be damaged by fire or by freezing temperatures.\nFig.~\\ref{fig:damages}.d depicts an example of the results of our thermal damage evaluation model.\n\n\\input{fig-tasks}\n\n\\textbf{Fluid Damage Evaluation Model:}\nFluid damage models harm from liquid exposure (e.g., swelling, contamination, or short-circuiting). \nSimilar to thermal damage, fluid damage can only be modeled for simulators that represent fluids; we provide an implementation of the fluid damage model in \\simname{} only in OmniGibson, which provides the necessary fluid computation.\n\nAnalogous to the previous evaluation models, in our fluid damage evaluation model we compute whether the fluid particles in contact with a link go over a given threshold and scale the effect into damage based on the resistance of the link to liquid harm.\nAt each timestep $t$, we retrieve the amount of liquid particles in contact with each link, $c_{\\ell}(t)$. \n\\simname{} then models fluid damage as:\n\\[\nd_{\\text{fluid}}(t) = \\Lambda_{\\text{fluid}}\\,\\max\\!\\big(c_{\\ell}(t) - \\mathrm{C}_{\\text{fluid}},\\,0\\big),\n\\]\nwhere threshold $\\mathrm{C}_{\\text{fluid}}$ controls how much exposure is tolerated before damage begins, and $\\Lambda_{\\text{fluid}}$ controls the rate at which damage accumulates thereafter. \nWaterproof objects can be modeled with large $\\mathrm{C}_{\\text{fluid}}$ and/or near-zero $\\Lambda_{\\text{fluid}}$, while electronics or liquid-delicate materials are defined with a low $\\mathrm{C}_{\\text{fluid}}$ and larger $\\Lambda_{\\text{fluid}}$.\nFig.~\\ref{fig:damages}.e depicts an example of the damage due to fluid obtained with our fluid damage evaluation model.\n\n% The three damage evaluation models above are implemented as part of \\simname{}, enabling modifying objects' health based on mechanical, thermal and fluid caused causes, but our methodology could be extended to other physical sources available in other robotics simulators beyond OmniGibson and MuJoCo.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: 03b-benchmark.tex\n================================================\n\\section{\\benchname{}}\n\\label{s:bench}\n\n\n\nWe introduce a suite of \\textbf{32 task instances} across the \\textbf{two simulators} (OmniGibson/OmniVerse for B1K tasks and MuJoCo for RoboCasa tasks), corresponding to \\textbf{21 unique task designs} (see Fig.~\\ref{fig:tasks}). \nThe suite is built to (i) expose policies to \\emph{physically damaging failure modes} that arise naturally in household manipulation, and (ii) make the safety distinction \\emph{measurable}: for most tasks there exists an easy, tempting strategy that completes the goal but risks damage, alongside a safer strategy that typically requires more careful interaction (e.g., gentler contacts, safer approach directions, or avoiding hazardous regions/objects).\n\nWe include a shared core of short- and medium-horizon tasks instantiated in both simulators, spanning common kitchen and household interactions such as opening doors/drawers, operating appliances, pick-and-place, grasping and shelving fragile objects, wiping a surface, and navigation followed by placement. We additionally include simulator-specific tasks that stress damage modes that are more naturally supported by a given backend or scene library. In RoboCasa, we include longer-horizon composite tasks (see Appendix) that chain multiple atomic skills in kitchen settings. In OmniGibson, we include tasks that explicitly stress \\emph{fluid} and \\emph{thermal} risks in contact-rich settings (e.g., pouring water near electronics, interacting with running water, and operating near fire/heat), as well as long-horizon activities adapted from BEHAVIOR-style household scenarios.\n\nAcross the suite, damaging shortcuts arise from realistic interaction pressures: slamming or forcing articulated objects (mechanical damage), operating near liquids and sensitive objects (fluid/electrical risk), and handling objects near heat sources (thermal damage). This structure lets us evaluate not only whether a policy reaches the goal, but whether it does so \\emph{without} incurring damage as quantified by \\methodname{}. We provide the full task list, simulator instantiations, and per-task metadata in the Appendix.\n\nFurthermore, as part of \\benchname{}, we provide 90 demonstrations across five tasks (\\textit{Shelve Cereal Box, Lift Egg, Add Firewood, Pour Water, Wipe Countertop}), evenly split between demonstrations collected with and without the \\textsc{DamageSim} plugin (see Fig.~\\ref{fig:interface} and Sec.~\\ref{exp:imitation-learning}).\n\n\\input{fig-il}\n\n================================================\nFILE: 04-experiments.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Experiments}\n\\label{s:exp}\nOur experiments are designed to demonstrate the utility and versatility of \\methodname{} as a safety framework for robotic manipulation.\nWe validate our framework by demonstrating the following use cases across two simulators (OmniGibson and Robocasa):\n\\begin{enumerate}[label=\\Alph*.]\n\\item Does \\methodname{} provide a sufficiently accurate signal to collect safer data and/or to train safer policies with imitation learning (Sec.~\\ref{exp:imitation-learning})? \n\\item Can \\methodname{}'s extended state be used to define safety-related reward to train/finetune policies with reinforcement learning (Sec.~\\ref{exp:rl})?\n\\item Does \\methodname{} reveal safety gaps in state-of-the-art VLA models that standard simulators miss (Sec.~\\ref{exp:benchmark-vla})? \n\\item Do the safety behaviors trained in \\methodname{} transfer to real robot tasks (Sec.~\\ref{exp:sim2real})? \n\\end{enumerate}\n\n\\subsection{\\methodname{} for Imitation Learning}\\label{exp:imitation-learning}\n\n\nWe investigate whether \\methodname{}'s damage-aware feedback can improve imitation learning in two distinct ways: by improving demonstration quality at collection time through real-time feedback, and by enabling automated curation of safe data from mixed-quality datasets without manual annotation.\nWe consider five tasks spanning different damage failure modes from our task suite: shelving an item (mechanical damage), pouring water near sensitive objects (fluid damage), adding firewood to a fireplace (thermal damage), wiping dirt from a table (mechanical damage), and picking up a fragile egg (mechanical damage).\n\n\\input{fig-demo-interface}\n\nFor each task, human operators collected demonstrations under two conditions.\nIn the health-feedback condition, operators viewed real-time health bars provided by \\simname{} during teleoperation (see Fig.~\\ref{fig:interface} for a visualization of the interface).\nIn the no-health-feedback condition, operators can only observe the video frames without the health feedback, matching the standard simulator teleoperation setup. \nIn the health-feedback condition, \\simname{} augments the interface with real-time safety visualizations in two ways. First, each damage-tracked object is associated with a live health bar that initializes at 100 and decreases as damage accumulates. This allows operators to immediately identify unsafe interactions, including failures that may occur outside the current camera view (e.g., the wine bottle falling behind furniture and being out of frame in Fig.~\\ref{fig:interface}). Secondly, \\simname{} can also optionally apply damage-based coloration, progressively tinting damaged objects red as health decreases. This provides an intuitive cue about which parts of the scene are experiencing unsafe interactions. Together, health bars and damage coloration provide complementary feedback to the user without changing the existing physics of the simulator.\nUsing these demonstrations, we train flow-based \\cite{lipman2023flowmatchinggenerativemodeling} imitation learning policies with action chunking under five data regimes:\n\\begin{description}[style=unboxed, font=\\normalfont\\itshape]\n \\item[All Data:] keeps all demonstrations regardless of collection condition, establishing baseline performance without any data curation.\n \\item[With Health Feedback:] exclusively retains demonstrations collected with live health feedback, testing whether real-time feedback during collection provided by \\methodname{} improves imitation learning policy safety.\n \\item[Without Health Feedback:] keeps demonstrations collected without feedback, providing a lower bound comparison on safety.\n \\item[Health-Filtered Episodes:] removes episodes from the full dataset where any object's health falls below $95$ at any timestep, testing whether episode-level curation can recover safety from mixed-quality data.\n \\item[Health-Filtered Datapoints:] removes individual timesteps from the full dataset whose subsequent $N$ steps incur damage exceeding a certain threshold. This filtering strategy is a middle ground between \\textit{All Data} and \\textit{Health-Filtered Episodes}. \n It preserves more data, but is myopic if $N$ is small. In this experiment, we set $N=8$, which is the same as the action chunk length.\n\\end{description}\n\nFig.~\\ref{fig:il} presents evaluation results averaged over $30$ rollouts per task. \nWe report two metrics to disentangle task performance from safety: \n\\textit{Task Completion Rate} measures success regardless of damage, while \\textit{Safe Task Completion Rate} requires both task success and all object health remaining above $95$.\nThe gap between these metrics quantifies how often policies succeed through unsafe behaviors.\nResults reveal a consistent pattern across all five tasks: policies trained on unfiltered data (green) or data collected without live feedback (blue) achieve high task completion rates but exhibit a substantial gap to safe task completion, indicating that these policies complete tasks through unsafe behaviors that standard evaluations would overlook.\nFor instance, on \\textit{Wipe Countertop}, the unfiltered policy achieves perfect task completion but only $35\\%$ safe completion.\nIn contrast, policies trained on data leveraging \\methodname{}'s damage signal—whether through real-time feedback during collection (orange) or post-hoc filtering (red, purple)—substantially improves the safe task completion rates. \nFig.~\\ref{fig:trajectories} visualizes the trajectory distributions for the \\textit{Shelve Cereal Box} task, comparing policies trained without health feedback (red) versus with health-filtered episodes (green). \nThe policy trained on filtered data exhibits a tighter distribution concentrated toward the right side of the shelf—a region free of fragile objects. \nIn contrast, the unfiltered policy produces more trajectories that frequently place the cereal box near or against fragile items. \nThese results confirm that \\methodname{} provides sufficiently accurate feedback to guide both human operators in real time and automated curation after the fact toward safer imitation learning.\n\n\\subsection{\\methodname{} for Reinforcement Learning}\\label{exp:rl}\n\n\n\\input{fig-trajectories}\n\nWe next investigate whether \\methodname{}'s damage signal can serve as a reward for training safe policies via reinforcement learning. \nWe evaluate three settings of RL training: steering a pre-trained flow-matching policy, fine-tuning a pre-trained Gaussian policy, and training from scratch.\n\nAcross all settings, we augment the task reward with a damage penalty derived from \\methodname{}: whenever damage is detected to any object, the agent receives a negative reward proportional to the damage caused. \nIn our setup, we use a simple additive form of the two rewards \n\\begin{equation} \\nonumber\n r(s_t) = \\mathcal{R}_{\\text{task}}(s_t) - w\\left( d_{\\text{mech}}(t) + d_{\\text{therm}}(t) + d_{\\text{fluid}}(t) \\right),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mathcal{R}_{\\text{task}}$ denotes the task reward and $w$ controls the weight of the damage penalty. \nThis formulation encourages the policy to complete tasks while minimizing damage across all modalities.\n\nWe apply Diffusion Steering (DSRL)~\\cite{wagenmaker2025steeringdiffusionpolicylatent} to the IL policy trained on w/o health feedback from the previous section on the \\textit{Shelve Cereal Box} task. \nDSRL optimizes a learnable initial noise distribution for the flow-matching policy, steering sampled trajectories toward safe behavior without modifying the underlying policy weights.\nSecond, we fine-tune a Gaussian policy pre-trained on mixed-quality demonstrations for the \\textit{Move Cup of Water} task, a modified version of \\textit{Pour Water}.\nThird, we train an RL policy from scratch on \\textit{Place Plate}, to verify that \\methodname{}'s reward signal is sufficient for learning safe behaviors without any demonstration data.\nAll settings use PPO~\\cite{schulman2017proximal} for optimization; hyperparameters are provided in Appendix.\n\nFig~\\ref{fig:rl_results} summarizes evaluation results using the same metrics as Section~\\ref{exp:imitation-learning}. \nDSRL improves safe task completion on \\textit{Shelve Cereal Box} from $13\\%$ to $33\\%$.\nFine-tuning the Gaussian policy yields a larger gain on \\textit{Move Cup of Water}, increasing safe success from $20\\%$ to $100\\%$. \nThese two fine-tuning results demonstrate that IL policies can be steered toward safety using the signals derived from \\simname{}. \nFinally, training from scratch with \\simname{}'s damage penalty achieves over $80\\%$ safe task completion compared to almost $0\\%$ when using task reward alone. \nThese results confirm that \\methodname{} provides a practical reward signal for training safe policies with RL—whether refining existing policies or training new ones—complementing its utility for imitation learning.\n\n\\input{fig-rl-results}\n\n\\subsection{Benchmarking VLAs on \\methodname{}}\\label{exp:benchmark-vla}\n\nWe demonstrate \\methodname{}'s ability to evaluate the safety of modern manipulation policies. We benchmark a state-of-the-art Vision Language Action (VLA) model, NVIDIA GR00T \\cite{gr00tn1_2025}, which achieves strong task performance across a wide range of household manipulation scenarios. Our goal is to assess whether such high-performing policies also behave safely, or whether task success masks damaging interactions that would be unacceptable in real-world settings.\n\nWe evaluate GR00T (used off-the-shelf, without any task-specific fine-tuning) on tasks from both OmniGibson and RoboCasa. OmniGibson tasks are long-horizon household activities, and to focus evaluation on contact-rich interactions where damage is most likely to occur, we benchmark representative manipulation subtasks from each activity (reported in parentheses). RoboCasa provides a set of shorter-horizon kitchen manipulation tasks, enabling controlled evaluation in atomic interaction settings. We additionally report results for pi0~\\cite{black2026pi0visionlanguageactionflowmodel} in Appendix \\ref{sec:add_vla}.\n\nWe evaluate each task over 30 episodes. For every rollout, we record three metrics: \\textbf{Task Completion}, indicating whether the task goal is achieved; \\textbf{Safe Completion}, indicating successful task completion without incurring any damage events as measured by \\simname{}; and \\textbf{Average Environment Health}, defined as the mean normalized health of the environment over the rollout. Together, these metrics distinguish policies that complete tasks from those that complete tasks safely.\n\n\nAcross both simulators, these results reveal a consistent gap between task performance and safety. Even when GR00T achieves high task success, it frequently incurs damage, leading to substantially lower safe success rates and degraded environment health. This highlights the limitation of evaluating VLAs solely based on task completion and motivates the need for benchmarks and learning signals that explicitly account for damaging interactions.\n\n\\subsection{Sim-to-real Transfer from \\methodname{}}\\label{exp:sim2real}\n\n\nFinally, we test whether safety improvements enabled by \\simname{} transfer to the real world. We train policies in OmniGibson for two tasks—\\textit{shelve cereal box} and \\textit{pour water}—and evaluate two methods: \\texttt{without\\_live\\_feedback} (damage-unaware) and \\texttt{filtered\\_episodes} (damage-aware) on a Franka Panda robot. For both tasks, the input to the policy is proprioception and low-dim states (i.e. object poses). We directly transfer the corresponding low-dim policies from sim to real. The action space is 6 dof delta eef pose and gripper open/close. We use a OSC Pose controller to control the Emika Franka Panda robot.\n\nBecause simulator health is not directly observable on hardware, we instead report a qualitative safety outcome indicating whether the task is completed without observable object damage (e.g., breakage, spills onto sensitive objects, or unsafe contact). For the shelving task, success is defined as placing the cereal box on the shelf, while for the pouring task, success requires pouring at least 10ml into the cup. Unsafe behavior includes toppling fragile objects or spilling water onto a laptop.\nAggregated across both tasks (10 trials per method per task) \\texttt{filtered\\_episodes} achieves a 75\\% task completion rate, 65\\% safe completion rate and an unsafe behavior rate of 15\\%, compared to 70\\% and 5\\% and 75\\% respectively for \\texttt{without\\_live\\_feedback}—a 60\\% reduction in unsafe behavior rate while maintaining comparable task performance.\nThis shows that explicit damage signals obtained via \\methodname{} can translate into improved safety on hardware.\n\n\\begin{table}[!t]\n\\caption{VLA (Gr00t) evaluation on \\benchname{}. C: Task Completion Rate, SC: Safe Task Completion Rate}\n \\centering\n \\begin{tabular*}{\\columnwidth}{@{\\extracolsep{\\fill}} l c c c}\n \\hline\n \\textbf{Task} & \\textbf{C [\\%]} & \\textbf{SC [\\%]} & \\textbf{Avg.\\ Health} \\\\\n \\hline\n (B1K-OG) attach camera & 8 & 4 & 71.25 \\\\\n (B1K-OG) open microwave door & 92 & 4 & 33.55 \\\\\n (B1K-OG) pick up scrubber & 28 & 8 & 85 \\\\\n (B1K-OG) ignite wood & 60 & 0 & 8 \\\\\n \\hline\n (RC-MJC) Open Single Door & 92 & 32 & 50.73 \\\\\n (RC-MJC) Turn On Microwave & 92 & 12 & 41.48 \\\\\n (RC-MJC) PnP: Counter to Microwave & 20 & 20 & 29.28 \\\\\n (RC-MJC) Turn On Stove & 88 & 8 & 0.2192 \\\\\n \\hline\n \\end{tabular*}\n \\label{tab:gr00t_combined}\n\\end{table}\n\n\\input{fig-rw}\n\n================================================\nFILE: 05-conclusion.tex\n================================================\n\\section{Limitations and Conclusion}\n\nIn this work we addressed the problem of evaluating and training safe robot policies in simulation.\nWe presented \\methodname{}, a novel framework composed of \\simname{}, a damage-aware simulation plugin implemented in two widely used simulators (OmniVerse and MuJoCo), \\benchname{}, a benchmark with 32 tasks and 450 demonstrations collected with and without live damage feedback to the teleoperators.\nThrough a comprehensive evaluation, we demonstrate the utility of \\methodname{} to train imitation and reinforcement learning policies, evaluate VLAs for safety, and transfer safe behaviors to the real world.\n\\methodname{} is not without limitations: first, our damage evaluation models are approximations of the underlying physical processes (e.g., mechanical fracture, burning effects, liquid dynamics) and therefore, the computed damage may differ from the accurate one. However, through our evaluation we indicated that the approximations are sufficient to represent with enough fidelity the real world damage sources.\nMoreover, while many of the values can be inferred from the material properties of the objects, the computation of damage requires a manual annotation from the users to define per link/object parameters. We believe this process can be greatly automated making use of the common sense knowledge in LLMs and VLMs.\nEven with these limitations, we hope \\methodname{} to facilitate research and development of safer robotic solutions.\n\n\\section*{Acknowledgments}\nThis work is in part supported by the UT-CNS Catalyst Grant and Toyota Research Institute - Young Faculty Researcher Program. \n\n================================================\nFILE: 06-appendix.tex\n================================================\n\\clearpage\n\\section*{Appendix}\n\\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Appendix}\n\n% Section numbering: A, B, C, ...\n\\setcounter{section}{0}\n\\renewcommand{\\thesection}{\\Alph{section}}\n\n% Subsection numbering: A.1, A.2, ...\n\\renewcommand{\\thesubsection}{\\thesection.\\arabic{subsection}}\n\n% Figure and table numbering: Figure A.1, Table B.2, ...\n\\setcounter{figure}{0}\n\\setcounter{table}{0}\n\\renewcommand{\\thefigure}{\\thesection.\\arabic{figure}}\n\\renewcommand{\\thetable}{\\thesection.\\arabic{table}}\n\n% \\section{Computational Efficiency}\n% Arpit\n% Include a plot of the speed of sim with N objects (increasing number) and a second line with the same number of objects but when we \"activate\" damage detection. Hopefully both lines will be close, even for hundreds of objects\n\n\\section{Constrained MDP Formulation}\n\\label{appdx:cmdp}\n\nIn the main text, we formulate \\simname{} as a Damage-Aware POMDP to provide maximum flexibility in how health and damage signals are utilized, whether as part of the observation space, for reward shaping, or as termination conditions. However, many established works in Safe RL ~\\cite{liu2023datasetsbenchmarksofflinesafe, redman,ray2019benchmarking,ji2023safety} adopt a \\textbf{Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP)} formulation. To ensure compatibility with these methods, we show here how our framework naturally maps to a CMDP. In this formulation, the agent's objective is to maximize the task-specific reward while keeping the cumulative physical damage below a predefined safety budget.\n\nOur tasks can be formally represented by the CMDP tuple $(\\mathcal{S}^{\\text{DA}}, \\mathcal{A}, \\mathcal{T}, R, C, \\hat{c}, \\gamma)$, where $\\mathcal{S}^{\\text{DA}} = \\mathcal{S} \\times \\mathcal{S}^h$ is the health-augmented state space, $\\mathcal{A}$ is the action space, $\\mathcal{T}(s' \\mid s, a)$ is the transition function including the health update rule defined in Section~\\ref{s:damagesim}, and $\\gamma \\in [0,1)$ is the discount factor. \n\nIn this context, the task-specific reward function $R(s, a)$ corresponds to $\\mathcal{R}_{task}$, rewarding purely functional achievements such as goal proximity or object placement. The damage cost function $C(s, a)$ is defined by the total damage signal produced by our suite of Damage Evaluation Models (DEMs) at each time step $t$:\n\\begin{equation}\n C(s_t, a_t) = \\sum_{k} d_{DEM_k}(t)\n\\end{equation}\nThe parameter $\\hat{c}$ represents the damage budget, specifying the maximum allowable cumulative health loss an agent or any object may incur over the course of an episode.\n\nUnder the CMDP framework, the objective is to find a policy $\\pi$ that maximizes the expected task reward while ensuring the expected damage does not exceed the budget $\\hat{c}$:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\max_{\\pi} \\mathbb{E}_{\\pi} \\left[ \\sum_{t=0}^{\\infty} \\gamma^t R(s_t, a_t) \\right] \\quad \\text{s.t.} \\quad \\mathbb{E}_{\\pi} \\left[ \\sum_{t=0}^{\\infty} \\gamma^t C(s_t, a_t) \\right] \\leq \\hat{c}\n\\end{equation}\n\n\\section{Tasks in \\benchname{}}\n\\label{appdx:tasks}\n\nTable~\\ref{tab:oopsiebenchtasks} enumerates the task suite used in \\benchname{}, grouped by simulator backend (Tasks that are present in \\emph{OG and RoboCasa}, \\emph{RoboCasa only}, and \\emph{OG only}). Beyond the high-level overview in Sec.~\\ref{s:bench}, the table summarizes per-task information that is useful when selecting tasks for training or evaluation, including the number of damageable objects tracked in the scene, and the expected failure cases.\n\nAcross these tasks, we intentionally span a range of common household hazards and unsafe shortcuts. For example, several short-horizon manipulation tasks (e.g., placing fragile dishware or shelving a cereal box) admit fast strategies that complete the goal but cause catastrophic damage, while safer strategies require gentler contacts or more careful strategies. Other tasks are designed to stress hazards that are naturally supported by a given simulator: OmniGibson tasks include explicit liquid and thermal risks (e.g., pouring water near electronics, interacting with running water, operating near a burning fireplace), while RoboCasa includes longer-horizon kitchen activities that chain multiple interactions and increase the opportunity for errors. While each task highlights a primary damage modality, many are designed with overlapping hazards; for instance, the \\textit{place bowl in sink} task requires the agent to simultaneously mitigate mechanical risks, such as high-impact drops, and fluid risks, such as water on the robot’s end-effector.\n\nImportantly, \\benchname{} is meant to be extensible. The task definitions are modular and the safety instrumentation provided by \\simname{} is environment-agnostic: users can add new scenes or task specifications and obtain the same health/damage signals, provided that damage tracking is enabled for the relevant objects. Additionally, \\simname{} is natively compatible with existing task definitions from the BEHAVIOR-1k and RoboCasa benchmarks, including 1,000 tasks from BEHAVIOR-1K and 360 from RoboCasa. When object-specific parameters are available (either from our provided settings or user-specified edits), \\simname{} can be applied to these additional tasks and environments with minimal configuration changes.\n\n\\begin{table*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{\\benchname{} Tasks}\n \\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{\n \\begin{tabular}{p{3.5cm} p{4cm} p{5.5cm} p{1.5cm}}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Task} & \\textbf{Task Type} & \\textbf{Anticipated Damage Type/s} & \\textbf{\\# Damageable Objects} \\\\\n \\hline\n \\multicolumn{4}{l}{\\textbf{BEHAVIOR-1K and Robocasa}} \\\\\n \\hline\n Place Plate & free-space pick-and-place & impact damages to plate & 2 \\\\\n Pick Egg & delicate object grasping & crushing damage to egg & 2 \\\\\n Shelve Cereal box & contact-assisted placement & impact damage to delicate objects & 6 \\\\\n Wipe Counter & sustained surface interaction & compression damage to robot & 1 \\\\\n Open Single Door & articulated object actuation & constraint violation damage to door/robot & 2 \\\\ \n Place in Microwave & constrained-space insertion & compression/shear damage to food/robot & 2 \\\\\n Open/Close Drawer & articulated object actuation & constraint violation damage to drawer/robot & 2 \\\\ \n Navigate and Pick & contact-rich nav & impact damage to delicate objects or compression damage to robot & 2 \\\\\n Turn on Stove & articulated object actuation & constraint violation damage to stove knob/robot & 2 \\\\\n Turn on Faucet & articulated object actuation & constraint violation damage to stove knob/robot & 2 \\\\\n \\hline\n \\multicolumn{4}{l}{\\textbf{Robocasa only}} \\\\\n \\hline\n Serve Pastry & delicate object grasping + transport & crushing/impact damage to pastry & 3 \\\\\n Prepare Breakfast & dynamic object transport & impact damage when objects spill from tray & 3 \\\\\n Dishes to Sink & fragile object pick and place & impact damages to fragile objects & 3 \\\\\n Prepare Coffee & constrained-space insertion & compression damages to robot & 3 \\\\\n Turn on Microwave & button actuation & compression damage to microwave/robot & 2 \\\\\n \\hline\n \\multicolumn{4}{l}{\\textbf{BEHAVIOR-1K only}} \\\\\n \\hline\n Pour Water (in cup) & fluid-aware manipulation & fluid-induced damage to laptop & 2 \\\\\n Fill Bowl \\\\ (with faucet running) & fluid-aware manipulation & fluid-induced damage to gripper & 1 \\\\\n Add Firewood (to a lit fireplace) & fire-aware manipulation & thermal damage to robot & 1 \\\\\n Attach Camera (to a tripod) & fragile object insertion & impact damage to camera & 2 \\\\\n Pick up Scrub & precise picking & compression damage to robot & 2 \\\\\n Ignite wood & fire-aware manipulation & thermal damage to robot & 1 \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n }\n \\label{tab:oopsiebenchtasks}\n\\end{table*}\n\n\n\n\\section{\\methodname{} for Imitation Learning}\nThis section details the imitation learning setup, comprising the dataset collection process, the flow matching policy architecture, and the training hyperparameters.\n\n\\begin{table}[t]\n \\centering\n \\caption{Task objects and dataset statistics.}\n \\label{tab:task_objects}\n \\begin{tabular}{l l l}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Task} & \\textbf{Task Objects} & \\makecell{\\textbf{Total Episodes} \\\\ \\textbf{(w/ + w/o Feedback)}} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\textsc{Shelve Item} & \\makecell[l]{Box of crackers, Flour bag, \\\\ Bottle of wine, Bottle of beer, \\\\ Wineglass} & $90 \\ (45 + 45)$ \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\textsc{Pick Egg} & Egg & $90 \\ (45 + 45)$ \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\textsc{Add Firewood} & Log, Fireplace, Robot & $60 \\ (30 + 30)$ \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\textsc{Pour Water} & \\makecell[l]{Laptop, Coffee cup, \\\\ Robot, Water glass} & $60 \\ (30 + 30)$ \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\textsc{Wipe Counter} & \\makecell[l]{Counter, Sponge, \\\\ Dirt, Robot} & $60 \\ (30 + 30)$ \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering \n\\caption{IL Hyperparameters}\n\\label{tab:hyperparameters} \n\\begin{tabular}{l l} \n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Hyperparameter} & \\textbf{Value} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{2}{l}{\\textit{Architecture}} \\\\\nFeature dimension $D$ & 512 \\\\\nTransformer layers $L$ & 4 \\\\\nAttention heads & 8 \\\\\nFFN expansion factor & 4 \\\\\nAttention dropout & 0.1 \\\\\nFFN dropout & 0.2 \\\\\nSegmentation embedding dim & 32 \\\\\nSegmentation image size & $128 \\times 128$ \\\\\nFrame stack $F$ & 2 \\\\\nAction chunk size $H$ & 8 \\\\\nAction dimension & 7 (6 for \\textsc{Pour Water}) \\\\\nProprioceptive state dimension & 23 \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{2}{l}{\\textit{Flow Matching}} \\\\\nTraining timestep sampler & $\\text{Beta}(1.5, 1.0)$ \\\\\nFlow-matching inference steps $K$ & 16 \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{2}{l}{\\textit{Training}} \\\\\nOptimizer & AdamW \\\\\nLearning rate & $3 \\times 10^{-4}$ \\\\\nWeight decay & $1 \\times 10^{-3}$ \\\\\nBatch size & 64 \\\\\nGradient clipping (max norm) & 5.0 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\n\\subsection{Demonstration Data Collection}\nFor each task in Section~\\ref{exp:imitation-learning}, we collected human demonstrations under two distinct conditions.\nIn the ``with health feedback\" condition, operators utilized the \\simname{} interface, which overlays real-time health bars on the video feed to visualize the objects' health (see Fig.~\\ref{fig:interface} and Section \\ref{exp:imitation-learning}).\nIn the ``w/o health feedback\" condition, operators viewed standard video frames without health indicators.\nWe collected a balanced dataset containing an equal number of episodes for both conditions; detailed statistics are provided in Table~\\ref{tab:task_objects}.\n\n\n\\subsection{Model Architecture}~\\label{appdx:model-arch}\nFor all the models trained in Section~\\ref{exp:imitation-learning}, we use the Conditional Flow model ~\\cite{lipman2023flowmatchinggenerativemodeling} based on a transformer backbone similar to the $\\pi_0$ action expert~\\cite{black2024pi_0}.\n\n\\textbf{Observation and action spaces.}\nThe policy's observation space consists of visual and proprioceptive inputs. \nThe visual input consists of six $128 \\times 128$ segmentation images from three camera viewpoints (one wrist-mounted, two external).\nWe only provide segmentation to task objects (refer to Table.~\\ref{tab:task_objects}).\nTo mitigate partial observability, we stack the last $2$ frames for each camera. \nThe proprioceptive input is a $23$-dimensional vector encoding the manipulator's joint positions, velocities, end-effector pose, and the gripper position.\nThe policy predicts an action chunk of horizon $T=8$. Each step in the chunk is a $7$-dimensional vector containing the desired delta-translation ($3$ dims), delta-rotation ($3$ dims), and gripper command ($1$ dim). \nAll action outputs are normalized to $[0, 1]$ during training and denormalized for inference.\n\n\\textbf{Segmetation and proprioception state encoder.}\nThe segmentation encoder converts integer-valued instance segmentation masks into dense feature vectors.\nIt is shared across all camera views and frame-stacked observations. \nEach segmentation image is a $128 \\times 128$ map of integer class IDs. \nThe encoder first maps each pixel's class ID to a 32-dimensional dense vector through a learned embedding table.\nThis converts the discrete segmentation mask into a continuous tensor of shape $128 \\times 128 \\times 32$, which can be interpreted as a 32-channel image. \nThis embedded representation is then processed by a residual convolutional network consisting of four modules.\nEach module contains a residual block followed by a strided convolution that halves the spatial resolution.\nThe residual blocks use two $3 \\times 3$ convolutions with GroupNorm ($16$ groups) and SiLU activations, with a skip connection that applies a $1 \\times 1$ projection convolution when the input and output channel dimensions differ.\nThe channel dimensions progress as $32 \\to 64 \\to 128 \\to 256 \\to 256$ across the four modules, reducing the spatial dimensions from $128 \\times 128$ down to $8 \\times 8$. A final residual block with $256$ channels is applied after the last stage.\nThe resulting $8 \\times 8 \\times 256$ feature map is spatially pooled using $4 \\times 4$ average pooling, producing a $2 \\times 2 \\times 256 = 1024$-dimensional vector. This vector is then projected to the model's feature dimension ($512$) through a two-layer MLP with a SiLU activation in between.\nAt each timestep $t$, we can obtain $3 \\times 2$ segmentation feature vectors $\\mathbf{I} = [\\mathbf{I}_{t-1}^1, \\mathbf{I}_{t}^1, ..., \\mathbf{I}_{t-1}^3, \\mathbf{I}_{t}^3]$, where the superscript camera index.\nThe most recent frame of the 23-dimensional proprioceptive state is encoded by a 3-layer MLP, which produces a single 512-dimensional vector $\\mathbf{s}_t$.\n\n\\textbf{Action decoder.}\nFollowing the architectural design of $\\pi_0$, we employ a Transformer backbone to parameterize the flow matching velocity field. \nThe model predicts the denoising velocity conditioned on the current noisy action, the observation, and the flow timestep $\\tau$. \n\nThe encoder output $7$ observation tokens (comprising $6$ segmentation embeddings $\\mathbf{I}_t$ and $1$ proprioceptive embedding $\\mathbf{s}_t$). \nWe project the noisy action chunk at the flow matching step $\\tau$ into $8$ tokens, denoted as $\\hat{\\mathbf{a}}_{t:t+T}^\\tau \\in \\mathbb{R}^{8 \\times 512}$. \nThe flow matching timestep $\\tau$ is mapped to a high-dimensional embedding $\\tau_{\\text{emb}}$ via a 2-layer MLP with SiLU activations. \nThe full input sequence to the Transformer is formed by concatenating the observation context, the timestep embedding, and the noisy action tokens $\\mathbf{x}^{\\text{in}}_t = [\\mathbf{I}_t, \\mathbf{s}_t, \\tau_{\\text{emb}}, \\hat{\\mathbf{a}}_{t:t+T}^\\tau]$.\nThis input sequence $\\mathbf{x}_{\\text{in}}$ is processed by a stack of 4 transformer layers, each consisting of multi-head self-attention (8 heads, 64 dimensions per head) followed by a feed-forward network that expands the feature dimension from 512 to 2048 with a GELU activation before projecting back to 512. Both sublayers use post-norm residual connections with LayerNorm.\nTo generate the flow matching update, we extract the last $8$ tokens corresponding to the action chunk from the Transformer output. \nThese tokens are passed through a final linear projection layer to produce the predicted velocity field $\\hat{\\mathbf{v}}_t^\\tau \\in \\mathbb{R}^{8 \\times 7}$.\n\n\\textbf{Inference}\nWe generate action chunks by integrating the learned flow using a fixed-step Euler solver with $K=16$ steps, initialized from a standard Gaussian prior $\\mathbf{a}_t^0 \\sim \\mathcal{N}(\\mathbf{0}, \\mathbf{I})$. \n\n\n\n\n\\subsection{Training and Evaluation}\nTable~\\ref{tab:hyperparameters} lists the specific hyperparameters used for training and inference.\nTo evaluate performance, we conduct $30$ episodes per model. In each episode, we introduce random perturbations to the initial poses and scales of the scene objects to assess the policy's robustness to scene variations.\n\n\\section{\\methodname{} for Reinforcement Learning}\n\n\n\\subsection{Diffusion Steering (DSRL) for \\textsc{Shelve Item}}\n \\begin{table}[t] \n \\centering \n \\caption{DSRL PPO hyperparameters}\n \\label{tab:dsrl_ppo_hyperparameters} \n \\begin{tabular}{l l}\n \\toprule\n \\textbf{Hyperparameter} & \\textbf{Value} \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\multicolumn{2}{l}{\\textit{Noise Policy Network}} \\\\\n Architecture & 5-layer MLP \\\\\n Hidden dimension & 1024 \\\\\n Activation & SiLU \\\\\n Mean clamp range & $[-1, 1]$ \\\\\n Std clamp range & $[0.1, 1.0]$ \\\\\n Noise sample clamp range & $[-2, 2]$ \\\\\n Initial std & 0.5 \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\multicolumn{2}{l}{\\textit{PPO}} \\\\\n Optimizer & Adam \\\\\n Learning rate & $1 \\times 10^{-4}$ \\\\\n Clip ratio $\\epsilon$ & 0.2 \\\\\n PPO epochs per iteration & 5 \\\\\n Minibatch size & 512 \\\\\n Entropy coefficient $\\beta$ & 0.0 \\\\\n Gradient clipping (max norm) & 1.0 \\\\\n Total steps & $5.2 \\times 10^5$ \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\multicolumn{2}{l}{\\textit{GAE}} \\\\\n Discount $\\gamma$ & 0.95 \\\\\n GAE $\\lambda$ & 0.95 \\\\\n \\midrule\n \\multicolumn{2}{l}{\\textit{Data Collection}} \\\\\n Replay buffer size & 2048 \\\\\n \\bottomrule\n \\end{tabular}\n \\end{table}\n\n\nWe investigate whether the damage signals provided by \\methodname{} can be leveraged to steer a pre-trained flow matching policy towards safer behaviors. To achieve this, we employ the Diffusion Steering (DSRL) framework~\\cite{wagenmaker2025steeringdiffusionpolicylatent}.\n\nUnlike standard fine-tuning approaches that update the entire diffusion backbone, DSRL optimizes a learned initial noise distribution to select specific noise (latents) that maximize returns.\nIn our setup, we train a policy $\\pi_{\\text{latent}}(\\mathbf{a}^0_t | \\mathbf{x}^\\mathrm{in}_t)$ using Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) \\cite{schulman2017proximalpolicyoptimizationalgorithms} to output the mean and variance of the initial noise $\\mathbf{a}^0$, replacing the standard Gaussian prior $\\mathcal{N}(\\mathbf{0}, \\mathbf{I})$.\n\nTo minimize computational overhead and preserve the learned feature representations for the base policy, we leverage the frozen encoder from the imitation learning policy described in Section~\\ref{appdx:model-arch}. \nThe DSRL policy is conditioned on these embeddings and outputs the distributional parameters (mean and variance) for the steered initial noise $\\mathbf{a}^0_t$.\nCrucially, freezing the encoders prevents the RL optimization from degrading the visual and proprioceptive features essential for the base policy's performance. \nFor this experiment, we specifically target the baseline policy trained \\textit{without} health feedback.\nAs this policy exhibited the highest likelihood for unsafe behavior, it serves as the ideal candidate to evaluate the efficacy of damage-aware steering.\nThe hyperparameters for the PPO training phase are detailed in Table~\\ref{tab:dsrl_ppo_hyperparameters}.\n\nFor the \\textsc{Shelve Item} task, we define the task completion as one where the cereal box is fully contained within the shelf boundaries and the gripper has released the object. \nWe use a sparse task reward, assigning a $+1$ reward only upon task completion, otherwise $0$.\nTo incentivize safety, we incorporate a penalty term derived from the the damage computed by \\simname{}. \nThis damage signal is normalized across the all task objects to the range $[-1, 0]$, ensuring the penalty magnitude is the same with the sparse task reward. \nDuring training, the base policy receives a latent from the DSRL policy and generates a full action chunk $\\mathbf{a}^1_{t:t+T}$. This chunk is executed completely before computing the next latent, enabling faster training by avoiding flow matching policy inference at every simulator step.\n\nFig.~\\ref{fig:rl} shows the training curves for the task completion reward $\\mathcal{R}_\\mathrm{task}$ (green) and the damage $d$ caused by the policy (yellow).\nWe observe that with steering, the task completion reward remains stable at levels comparable to the initial base policy, while damage consistently decreases. This demonstrates that \\simname{} provides effective damage and health signals for steering the flow matching policy toward safer behaviors.\n\n\\subsection{Finetuning a BC-Gaussian Policy for \\textsc{Move Glass of Water}}\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\caption{BC + PPO hyperparameters for \\textsc{Move Glass of Water}}\n\\label{tab:move_glass_bc_ppo_hyperparameters}\n% tabularx with \\textwidth ensures the table stays within margins\n% The 'X' column type will automatically wrap text\n\\begin{tabularx}{\\columnwidth}{l X}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Hyperparameter} & \\textbf{Value} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{2}{l}{\\textit{Policy / Value Networks}} \\\\\nArchitecture (actor \\& critic) & 4-layer MLP \\\\\nHidden dimensions & 256--1024--1024--256 \\\\\nActivation & Tanh \\\\\nAction distribution & Gaussian + Tanh squashing \\\\\nInitial log-std & $-0.5$ \\\\\nObservation & EEF pose + mug pose (14D) \\\\\nAction & EEF position delta (3D); gripper held closed \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{2}{l}{\\textit{Behavior Cloning (BC)}} \\\\\nOffline dataset & 50 teleop demos (25 safe, 25 unsafe) \\\\\nBC epochs & 20 \\\\\nBC objective & Maximize log-likelihood of demo actions \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{2}{l}{\\textit{PPO Finetuning}} \\\\\nOptimizer & Adam \\\\\nLearning rate & $1\\times10^{-3}$ (annealed) \\\\\nTotal steps & $3.0\\times10^4$ \\\\\nRollout length & 512 \\\\\nUpdate epochs per iteration & 8 \\\\\nMinibatches per update & 4 (minibatch size 128) \\\\\nClip ratio $\\epsilon$ & 0.1 \\\\\nEntropy coefficient $\\beta$ & 0.0 \\\\\nValue loss coefficient & 0.7 \\\\\nGradient clipping (max norm) & 0.5 \\\\\nTarget KL & 0.01 \\\\\nDiscount $\\gamma$ & 0.99 \\\\\nGAE $\\lambda$ & 0.95 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabularx}\n\\end{table}\n\nWe evaluate whether \\simname{}'s damage signals can be used to improve safety in a continuous-control setting with liquids and electrical hazards.\nFor the \\textsc{Move Glass of Water} task, we begin with a Gaussian policy trained via behavior cloning (BC) on a teleoperation dataset containing 50 demonstrations (25 safe and 25 unsafe trajectories).\nThe BC policy achieves a task completion rate of 100\\%, but only 20\\% safe success, motivating RL finetuning to reduce damage while maintaining task competence.\n\nWe finetune the BC-initialized policy using Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) \\cite{schulman2017proximalpolicyoptimizationalgorithms} for 30,000 environment steps.\nThe policy observes a state consisting of the robot end-effector pose and the mug pose (14D total), and outputs only end-effector position deltas (3D).\n\nRewards combine a task-progress term with a safety penalty derived from \\simname{} (see Sec.~\\ref{exp:rl}).\nConcretely, the task reward is the negative distance to a fixed goal position on the target surface, with a large terminal bonus on success.\nA rollout terminates either when the mug reaches the goal (yielding a $+300$ success reward) or when accumulated damage causes any tracked entity's health to reach zero (yielding a large negative terminal penalty).\nThe overall scalar reward at each step is the sum of the task-distance reward and the damage-derived reward (with unit weights in our implementation).\nAll PPO and BC hyperparameters are summarized in Table~\\ref{tab:move_glass_bc_ppo_hyperparameters}.\n\n\n\\subsection{RL from Scratch for \\textsc{Place Plate}}\n\\begin{table}[t]\n\\centering\n\\caption{PPO hyperparameters for \\textsc{Place Plate}}\n\\label{tab:place_plate_ppo_hyperparameters}\n\\begin{tabular}{l l}\n\\toprule\n\\textbf{Hyperparameter} & \\textbf{Value} \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{2}{l}{\\textit{Observation / Action Spaces}} \\\\\nObservation space & 6D ($[\\text{EEF pos};\\, \\text{plate pos}]$) \\\\\nAction space & 4D ($[\\Delta x, \\Delta y, \\Delta z,\\, \\text{gripper}]$) \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{2}{l}{\\textit{Policy / Value Networks}} \\\\\nPolicy distribution & Gaussian + Tanh squashing \\\\\nActor architecture & 2-layer MLP (512, 512) \\\\\nCritic architecture & 2-layer MLP (512, 512) \\\\\nActivation & Tanh \\\\\nInitial log-std (arm dims) & $-0.5$ \\\\\nInitial log-std (gripper dim) & $-1.5$ \\\\\n\\midrule\n\\multicolumn{2}{l}{\\textit{PPO}} \\\\\nOptimizer & Adam \\\\\nLearning rate & $1\\times10^{-3}$ (annealed) \\\\\nTotal steps & $1.0\\times10^5$ \\\\\nRollout length & 512 \\\\\nUpdate epochs per iteration & 10 \\\\\nMinibatches per update & 8 \\\\\nClip ratio $\\epsilon$ & 0.2 \\\\\nEntropy coefficient $\\beta$ & 0.0 \\\\\nValue loss coefficient & 0.5 \\\\\nGradient clipping (max norm) & 0.5 \\\\\nTarget KL & 0.01 \\\\\nDiscount $\\gamma$ & 0.99 \\\\\nGAE $\\lambda$ & 0.95 \\\\\n\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}\n\\end{table}\n\n\nIn \\textsc{Place Plate}, the robot begins holding a plate above the counter and must place it onto the target region.\nWe train a continuous-control policy from scratch using PPO under two reward settings: (i) a task-only objective and (ii) a combined task-and-damage objective.\n\nOur task reward is a dense signal given by the negative distance to the goal position, with a large positive success bonus (similar to the \\textsc{Move glass of water} task).\nFor the damage-aware setting, we add the same damage-derived penalty term used in the other RL experiments (see Sec.~\\ref{exp:rl}).\nWe set the damage weight to $w{=}2$ for this task.\n\nTraining with task reward alone produces an unsafe strategy that drops the plate to reduce distance quickly.\nIn contrast, incorporating the damage penalty discourages damaging interactions, leading to gentler placements that preserve plate health.\nTraining hyperparameters are provided in Table~\\ref{tab:place_plate_ppo_hyperparameters}.\n\n\\section{Additional VLA experiments}\n\\label{sec:add_vla}\nWe evaluated pi0 (off-the-shelf, no fine-tuning) ~\\cite{black2026pi0visionlanguageactionflowmodel} on the 4 RoboCasa VLA tasks (as mentioned in Table \\ref{tab:gr00t_combined} and observed a 17.5\\% completion rate, 0\\% safe completion rate as compared to 73\\%, 18\\% respectively for Gr00t. pi0 did not perform any meaningful behavior on the B1K tasks since it wasn't post-trained on them.\n\n% \\section{Damage-Aware GUI}\n% \\label{sec:damage_gui}\n\n% To help users interpret safety outcomes during interaction, \\simname{} provides optional GUI augmentations that visualize damage and health in real time (Fig.~\\ref{fig:interface}).\n% These overlays are available in both simulators and can be enabled alongside standard teleoperation or policy execution.\n\n% First, \\simname{} renders a live \\emph{health bar} for each damage-tracked object specified in the scene configuration.\n% Health bars initialize at $100$ and update continuously as damage accumulates, allowing users to immediately identify which object is being harmed and by how much.\n% This is particularly helpful when damage occurs outside the current camera view (e.g., an object falling behind a counter or rolling out of frame): even if the user cannot directly observe the event, the health bars provide an immediate indication that damage has occurred.\n\n% Second, \\simname{} optionally applies \\emph{damage-based coloration} to tracked objects.\n% As an object’s health decreases, its appearance is changed progressively toward red, providing an intuitive cue about which parts of the scene are experiencing unsafe interaction.\n% Together, health bars and damage coloration provide complementary feedback to the user without changing the existing physics of the simulator.\n\n% In practice, these GUI features make it easier to collect safer demonstrations and to iterate on policies by providing safety feedback that is not available in standard interfaces.\n\n\n\\input{fig-rl}\n\n\\section{Setting Object Parameters}\n\\label{sec:config_damage}\n\n\\simname{} models mechanical, thermal, and fluid damage using the\nobject-specific parameters introduced in Section~\\ref{s:damagesim}.\nBecause real objects exhibit diverse failure behaviors that depend on properties such as material,\ngeometry, etc., there is no single set of parameters\nthat accurately captures all objects. Instead, \\simname{} exposes these\nparameters to the user and treats them as part of the environment specification.\n\n\\simname{} parameters are set through the same configuration file (or dictionary)\nused to construct the environment. Each object's damage parameters\nare specified alongside standard per-object attributes already present in\nsimulator configs (e.g., pose, scale). We provide parameter\nsettings for all objects used in our tasks and experiments, but the\nconfiguration is intentionally editable: users can easily make objects more or\nless fragile based on the behaviors they wish to model.\n\nDamage tracking can be enabled for any subset of objects in the scene. For\narticulated objects, users may optionally restrict tracking to a subset of rigid\nparts (``links'') and can further provide link-specific overrides. This level of\nspecification is \\emph{not required} for typical use (the default is to track all\nlinks with shared parameters), but it is useful when different parts of an object exhibit different behaviors (e.g., the different parts of a Tiago robot), and a user wishes to model them.\n\nCrucially, specifying parameters for new objects does not require strong domain expertise. The objective is to establish a physically grounded proxy for unsafe interactions rather than perfectly modeling every material property. As such, users can utilize our provided benchmark objects as starting points for objects with similar properties and perform minimal iterative tuning to achieve effective results.\n\nTables~\\ref{tab:appendix_mech_params}, \\ref{tab:appendix_therm_params}, and\n\\ref{tab:appendix_fluid_params} list the per-object parameter values used in our\nexperiments for the mechanical, thermal, and fluid evaluators, respectively.\n\n\n\\begin{table}[htbp]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{6pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.15}\n\\begin{tabular}{lcccc}\n\\hline\n\\textbf{Object} & $\\alpha$ & $\\beta$ & $\\mathcal{E}_{\\text{mech}}$ & $\\Lambda_{\\text{mech}}$ \\\\\n\\hline\n\\texttt{default} & 1.0 & 1.0 & 30.0 & 0.1 \\\\\n\\texttt{agent} (robot) & 0.01 & 1.0 & 70.0 & 0.2 \\\\\n\\texttt{microwave} & 1.0 & 1.0 & 100.0 & 1.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{camera\\_tripod} & 0.1 & 1.0 & 150.0 & 1.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{digital\\_camera} & 1.0 & 0.5 & 60.0 & 100.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{scrub\\_brush} & 0.01 & 0.01 & 300.0 & 100.0 \\\\\n\\hline\n\\texttt{bottle\\_of\\_wine} & 1.0 & 0.5 & 50.0 & 100.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{wineglass} & 1.0 & 0.5 & 15.0 & 100.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{bottle\\_of\\_beer} & 1.0 & 0.5 & 15.0 & 100.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{bag\\_of\\_flour} & 0.1 & 0.1 & 150.0 & 100.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{box\\_of\\_crackers}& 0.1 & 0.8 & 200.0 & 1.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{stand} & 0.001& 0.001 & 500.0 & 1.0 \\\\\n\\hline\n\\texttt{laptop} & 1.0 & 0.5 & 80.0 & 100.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{water\\_glass} & 1.0 & 0.5 & 50.0 & 100.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{coffee\\_cup} & 1.0 & 0.5 & 150.0 & 1.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{plate} & 1.0 & 0.5 & 50.0 & 10.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{vase} & 1.0 & 0.5 & 30.0 & 10.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{pedestal\\_table} & 0.1 & 0.1 & 150.0 & 1.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{swivel\\_chair} & 0.1 & 0.1 & 500.0 & 1.0 \\\\\n\\hline\n\\end{tabular}\n\\caption{Mechanical damage parameters per object. Symbols match Sec.~\\ref{s:damagesim}:\n$\\varepsilon_{\\text{mech}}=\\alpha F_{\\parallel}+\\beta F_{\\perp}$ and\n$d_{\\text{mech}}=\\Lambda_{\\text{mech}}\\max(\\varepsilon_{\\text{mech}}-\\mathcal{E}_{\\text{mech}},0)$.}\n\\label{tab:appendix_mech_params}\n\\end{table}\n\n\n\n\n\\begin{table}[htbp]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{6pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.15}\n\\begin{tabular}{lccc}\n\\hline\n\\textbf{Object} & $\\mathcal{T}_{\\text{hot}}$ & $\\mathcal{T}_{\\text{cold}}$ & $\\Lambda_{\\text{therm}}$ \\\\\n\\hline\n\\texttt{agent} (robot) & 40.0 & -20.0 & 1.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{camera\\_tripod} & 50.0 & -30.0 & 0.1 \\\\\n\\texttt{digital\\_camera} & 50.0 & -30.0 & 0.1 \\\\\n\\texttt{laptop} & 50.0 & -20.0 & 0.1 \\\\\n\\texttt{vase} & 60.0 & -40.0 & 0.01 \\\\\n\\texttt{pedestal\\_table} & 60.0 & -40.0 & 0.01 \\\\\n\\texttt{swivel\\_chair} & 60.0 & -60.0 & 0.01 \\\\\n\\hline\n\\end{tabular}\n\\caption{Thermal damage parameters per object. Symbols match Sec.~\\ref{s:damagesim}:\n$d_{\\text{therm}}(t)=\\Lambda_{\\text{therm}}\\max(T-\\mathcal{T}_{\\text{hot}},0)+\\Lambda_{\\text{therm}}\\max(\\mathcal{T}_{\\text{cold}}-T,0)$\n(our code uses a single scale $\\Lambda_{\\text{therm}}$ applied symmetrically).}\n\n\\label{tab:appendix_therm_params}\n\\end{table}\n\n\n\\begin{table}[htbp]\n\\centering\n\\small\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{6pt}\n\\renewcommand{\\arraystretch}{1.15}\n\\begin{tabular}{lcc}\n\\hline\n\\textbf{Object} & $\\mathrm{C}_{\\text{fluid}}$ & $\\Lambda_{\\text{fluid}}$ \\\\\n\\hline\n\\texttt{agent} (robot) & 10.0 & 10.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{digital\\_camera} & 20.0 & 5.0 \\\\\n\\texttt{laptop} & 20.0 & 5.0 \\\\\n\\hline\n\\end{tabular}\n\\caption{Liquid-exposure parameters per object. Symbols match Sec.~\\ref{s:damagesim}:\ndamage begins once exposure exceeds $\\mathrm{C}_{\\text{fluid}}$ and then accumulates as\n$d_{\\text{fluid}}(t)=\\Lambda_{\\text{fluid}}\\max(\\mathrm{C}(t)-\\mathrm{C}_{\\text{fluid}},0)$.}\n\\label{tab:appendix_fluid_params}\n\\end{table}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: fig-damages.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{figure*}[!ht]\n\\centering\n\\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.193\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth, height=2.5cm]{Figures/damage_types/shelve_item_1.jpeg}\n %\\vspace{2pt}\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth, height=2.5cm]{Figures/damage_types/shelve_item_2.jpeg}\n \\caption{Impact Damage}\n\\end{subfigure}\n\\hfill\n\\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.193\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth, height=2.5cm]{Figures/damage_types/pick_egg_1.jpeg}\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth, height=2.5cm]{Figures/damage_types/pick_egg_2.jpeg}\n \\caption{Compression Damage}\n\\end{subfigure}\n\\hfill\n\\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.193\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth, height=2.5cm]{Figures/damage_types/drawer_1.jpeg}\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth, height=2.5cm]{Figures/damage_types/drawer_2.jpeg}\n \\caption{Tension Damage}\n\\end{subfigure}\n\\hfill\n\\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.193\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth, height=2.5cm]{Figures/damage_types/firewood_1.jpeg}\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth, height=2.5cm]{Figures/damage_types/firewood_2.jpeg}\n \\caption{Thermal Damage}\n\\end{subfigure}\n\\hfill\n\\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.193\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth, height=2.5cm]{Figures/damage_types/pour_water_1.jpeg}\n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth, height=2.5cm]{Figures/damage_types/pour_water_3.jpeg}\n \\caption{Liquid Damage}\n\\end{subfigure}\n\\caption{\\textbf{Types of physical damage detected by \\simname{}}. Object-level damage caused by excessive a) impact, b) compression forces, or c) tensile forces, by d) temperature changes, or by e) water spills are measured and tracked by our simulation plugin, \\simname{}, enabling learning and evaluating their effect in robot behaviors. In the pictures, the top row shows a state without damage while in the bottom row the pictures depict damaged objects (\\textit{most left:} wine bottle, \\textit{second left:} egg, \\textit{center:} cabinet with drawer, \\textit{second right:} robot arm, \\textit{right:} laptop), indicated by levels of red color.\n}\n\\label{fig:damages}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n================================================\nFILE: fig-demo-interface.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.95\\linewidth]{Figures/Interface.pdf}%\n % https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1nl_S76NZb0R7izwOchZ5INXx_303D6Ro_-AB3l7jZbE/edit\n % \\includegraphics[width=0.49\\linewidth]{Figures/omnigibson_viz.png}\n \\caption{\n \\textbf{Real-time damage visualization provided by \\simname{}}. The interface tracks and displays to the teleoperator the per-object health as the interactions occur, enabling immediate identification and reaction to unsafe behaviors. It displays the health in two complementary ways: health bars, which allow for visualizing the health of objects out of frame, and as object coloration, which gives an intuitive cue of damage. These overlays are available in both simulators and can be enabled alongside standard teleoperation or policy execution.\n }\n % TODO: Add info about our UI enabling tracking of objects not visible after interaction (wine bottle)\n \\label{fig:interface}\n % TODO: describe the color and other thigns in this figure\n\\end{figure}\n\n================================================\nFILE: fig-il.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.99\\linewidth]{Figures/IL_plot.pdf}%\n \\caption{\\textbf{Imitation Learning with \\methodname{}}. Task completion rate (\\textit{solid bar}) and safe task completion rate (\\textit{striped bar}) for policies trained with only demonstrations collected without health feedback (\\textit{blue}), only demonstrations collected with health feedback (\\textit{orange}), all the demonstrations (\\textit{green}), all demonstrations filtering entire episodes (\\textit{red}) and individual datapoints (\\textit{purple}) with health losses $>5$, for 5 tasks from \\benchname{}. While using all demonstrations achieve higher task completion rates, they lead to significant unsafe execution (low safe task completion). Variants of IL using health information obtain higher safe task execution with minimal drop in task completion, indicating that \\methodname{}'s information is a strong source for safe IL policy learning.}\n \\label{fig:il}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n================================================\nFILE: fig-rl-results.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\vspace{-20pt}\n \\includegraphics[width=0.99\\linewidth]{Figures/rl_plot.pdf}%\n \\caption{\\textbf{Reinforcement Learning with \\methodname{}.} We evaluate three RL variants across 3 tasks: training from scratch, fine-tuning a BC-GMM policy, and DSRL fine-tuning. Comparing safe task completion rates between the baseline that does not use \\methodname{}'s health information (\\textit{blue}) and methods that do (\\textit{orange}), shows that \\methodname{} enables learning safer policies both from scratch and through the fine-tuning of existing policies.}\n \\label{fig:rl_results}\n\\end{figure}\n\n================================================\nFILE: fig-rl.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{figure*}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.32\\linewidth,height=0.4\\linewidth]{Figures/rl_curve_shelve.pdf}%\n \\hspace{0.06\\linewidth}%\n \\includegraphics[width=0.32\\linewidth,height=0.4\\linewidth]{Figures/move_water_reward_and_damage.pdf}%\n\n \\vspace{0.5em}\n\n \\includegraphics[width=0.32\\linewidth,height=0.4\\linewidth]{Figures/wo_damage_reward_and_damage.pdf}%\n \\includegraphics[width=0.32\\linewidth,height=0.4\\linewidth]{Figures/w_damage_reward_and_damage.pdf}%\n \\hspace{0.06\\linewidth}%\n \\caption{\\textbf{Reinforcement Learning with \\methodname{}}. We use \\simname{}'s damage and health signal for RL training for \\textsc{Shelve Item} with DSRL, and \\textsc{Move glass of water} and \\textsc{Place plate} with PPO. \n We plot task return (green) and damage (yellow) to decouple task performance from safety metrics, demonstrating that policies trained with \\simname{} can maintain high task success while progressively reducing the damage.\n (\\textit{top row:}) \\textsc{Shelve Item} with DSRL (\\textit{left}) and \\textsc{Move glass of water} with PPO (\\textit{right}). (\\textit{bottom row:}) \\textsc{Place plate} trained with PPO using task reward only (\\textit{left}) and task reward with the damage penalty enabled (\\textit{right}), illustrating that without damage feedback the policy attains the goal but incurs substantially higher damage.\n For visualization, the curves are smoothed using a moving average with a window of the last 10 episode returns for \\textsc{Shelve Item} (top left) and the last 60 episode returns for the other three plots.\n }\n \\label{fig:rl}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n\n\n% \\begin{figure*}[t]\n% \\centering\n% \\includegraphics[width=0.32\\linewidth,height=0.4\\linewidth]{Figures/rl_curve_shelve.pdf}%\n% \\hfill\n% \\includegraphics[width=0.32\\linewidth,height=0.4\\linewidth]{Figures/move_water_reward_and_damage.pdf}%\n% \\hfill\n% \\includegraphics[width=0.32\\linewidth,height=0.4\\linewidth]{example-image-a}%\n% \\caption{\\textbf{Reinforcement Learning with \\methodname{}}. (\\textit{from top to bottom:}) training curves (reward/return), task success, and health evolution over time for \\roberto{task1} trained with \\roberto{method1} (\\textit{left}), \\roberto{task2} trained with \\roberto{method2} (\\textit{center}), and \\roberto{task3} trained with \\roberto{method3} (\\textit{right}). All methods increase task success while maintaining a higher overall health. Using \\methodname{}'s enabled health-based reward term facilitates different forms of safe-RL policy training.}\n% \\label{fig:rl}\n% \\end{figure*}\n\n================================================\nFILE: fig-rw.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.99\\linewidth]{Figures/real_world_fig.pdf}%\n % https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1ZSf9I47xKeIhJm7Aigg64Vjne694sj8kA2Cho8DA14U/edit\n \\caption{\\textbf{Sim-to-real transfer of policies trained in \\methodname{}}. We evaluate baseline IL policy (without health feedback) with the IL policy with health-filtered episodes on Panda robot. The baseline IL policy often performs unsafe behaviors like spilling water on the laptop or pushing a fragile bottle over the shelf. Whereas the damage-aware filtered-episode IL policy learns safer behaviors. The damage-aware IL policy results in a 60 \\% safer execution as compared to the baseline IL policy. This shows that \\methodname{} can enable transferring safer policies to the real world.}\n \\label{fig:rw}\n % \\vspace{0.1em} \n\\end{figure}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: fig-tasks.tex\n================================================\n\\newcommand{\\TaskImg}[2][example-image-a]{% \n \\begin{overpic}[width=0.136\\textwidth,height=0.065\\textheight,percent]{#1}% \n \\put(100,65){\\makebox(0,0)[tr]{\\colorbox{white}{\\tiny\\texttt{#2}}}}\n \\end{overpic}% \n}\n\n\\begin{figure*}[!h]\n\\centering\n\\setlength{\\tabcolsep}{0pt}\n\\begin{tabular}{ccccccc}\n\\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/open_single_door]{Open Single Door} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/shelve_item]{Shelve Item} & \n\\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/wipe_counter]{Wipe Counter} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/pick_plate]{Place Plate} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/turn_on_stove]{Turn on Stove} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/pick_bowl_from_faucet]{Fill Bowl} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/pour_glass]{Pour Water} \\\\\n\\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/place_log_in_fireplace]{Add Firewood} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/prepare_breakfast]{Prepare Breakfast} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/turn_on_sink]{Turn on Faucet} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/nav_to_table]{Navigate and pick} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/set_pastry]{Serve Pastry} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/coffee_setup_mug]{Prepare Coffee} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/clean_trumpet]{Pick up Scrubber} \\\\\n\\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/pick_egg]{Pick Egg} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/attach_camera_to_tripod]{Attach Camera} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/counter_to_microwave]{Place in Microwave} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/dirty_dishes]{Dishes to Sink} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/setting_the_fire]{Ignite Wood} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/turn_on_microwave]{Turn on Microwave} & \\TaskImg[Figures/task-collage/open_drawer]{Open Drawer}\\\\\n\\end{tabular}\n\n\\caption{\\textbf{Tasks in \\benchname{}}. The image show 21 different tasks instantiated in Behavior-1k/OmniGibson (built on Nvidia Omniverse) and/or RoboCasa/Robosuite (built on DeepMind MuJoCo). The complete task suite includes 32 tasks combining both simulators spanning diverse household objects, scenes, and interaction patterns, and is designed to expose agents to potential hazards across multiple damage modalities, including mechanical (impact,\n% \\includegraphics[height=1.5em]{Figures/task-collage/attach_camera_to_tripod.jpg}\ncompression, tension), thermal, and fluid interactions (main damage modality per task is indicated with icons at the top left corner of each image).}\n\\label{fig:tasks}\n\\end{figure*}\n\n================================================\nFILE: fig-trajectories.tex\n================================================\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.95\\linewidth]{Figures/traj_disrt.png}%\n \\caption{\\textbf{Trajectory differences based on damage feedback}. Trajectories generated by the policy trained on w/o health feedback dataset that is not aware of damage (\\textit{red}) constantly pushes towards fragile objects.\n In contrast, the policy trained with health-filtered episodes (\\textit{green}) more frequently directs its trajectories toward the paper bag—even though interaction is required—resulting in safer task completions.}\n \\label{fig:trajectories}\n\\end{figure}\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.bbl\n================================================\n\\begin{thebibliography}{38}\n\\providecommand{\\natexlab}[1]{#1}\n\\providecommand{\\url}[1]{\\texttt{#1}}\n\\expandafter\\ifx\\csname urlstyle\\endcsname\\relax\n \\providecommand{\\doi}[1]{doi: #1}\\else\n \\providecommand{\\doi}{doi: \\begingroup \\urlstyle{rm}\\Url}\\fi\n\n\\bibitem[Li et~al.(2024)Li, Zhang, Wong, Gokmen, Srivastava, Martín-Martín, Wang, Levine, Ai, Martinez, Yin, Lingelbach, Hwang, Hiranaka, Garlanka, Aydin, Lee, Sun, Anvari, Sharma, Bansal, Hunter, Kim, Lou, Matthews, Villa-Renteria, Tang, Tang, Xia, Li, Savarese, Gweon, Liu, Wu, and Fei-Fei]{li2024behavior1khumancenteredembodiedai}\nChengshu Li, Ruohan Zhang, Josiah Wong, Cem Gokmen, Sanjana Srivastava, Roberto Martín-Martín, Chen Wang, Gabrael Levine, Wensi Ai, Benjamin Martinez, Hang Yin, Michael Lingelbach, Minjune Hwang, Ayano Hiranaka, Sujay Garlanka, Arman Aydin, Sharon Lee, Jiankai Sun, Mona Anvari, Manasi Sharma, Dhruva Bansal, Samuel Hunter, Kyu-Young Kim, Alan Lou, Caleb~R Matthews, Ivan Villa-Renteria, Jerry~Huayang Tang, Claire Tang, Fei Xia, Yunzhu Li, Silvio Savarese, Hyowon Gweon, C.~Karen Liu, Jiajun Wu, and Li~Fei-Fei.\n\\newblock Behavior-1k: A human-centered, embodied ai benchmark with 1,000 everyday activities and realistic simulation, 2024.\n\\newblock URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09227}.\n\n\\bibitem[{NVIDIA}()]{nvidia_omniverse_dev_overview}\n{NVIDIA}.\n\\newblock Nvidia omniverse developer overview.\n\\newblock \\url{https://docs.omniverse.nvidia.com/dev-overview/latest/index.html}.\n\\newblock Accessed 2026-01-31.\n\n\\bibitem[Nasiriany et~al.(2024)Nasiriany, Maddukuri, Zhang, Parikh, Lo, Joshi, Mandlekar, and Zhu]{nasiriany2024robocasa}\nSoroush Nasiriany, Abhiram Maddukuri, Lance Zhang, Adeet Parikh, Aaron Lo, Abhishek Joshi, Ajay Mandlekar, and Yuke Zhu.\n\\newblock Robocasa: Large-scale simulation of everyday tasks for generalist robots.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02523}, 2024.\n\n\\bibitem[Zhu et~al.(2025)Zhu, Wong, Mandlekar, Martín-Martín, Joshi, Lin, Maddukuri, Nasiriany, and Zhu]{zhu2025robosuitemodularsimulationframework}\nYuke Zhu, Josiah Wong, Ajay Mandlekar, Roberto Martín-Martín, Abhishek Joshi, Kevin Lin, Abhiram Maddukuri, Soroush Nasiriany, and Yifeng Zhu.\n\\newblock robosuite: A modular simulation framework and benchmark for robot learning, 2025.\n\\newblock URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.12293}.\n\n\\bibitem[Todorov et~al.(2012)Todorov, Erez, and Tassa]{todorov2012mujoco}\nEmanuel Todorov, Tom Erez, and Yuval Tassa.\n\\newblock Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control.\n\\newblock In \\emph{2012 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems}, pages 5026--5033. IEEE, 2012.\n\n\\bibitem[Mitchell et~al.(2005)Mitchell, Bayen, and Tomlin]{mitchell2005time}\nIan~M Mitchell, Alexandre~M Bayen, and Claire~J Tomlin.\n\\newblock A time-dependent hamilton-jacobi formulation of reachable sets for continuous dynamic games.\n\\newblock \\emph{IEEE Transactions on automatic control}, 50\\penalty0 (7):\\penalty0 947--957, 2005.\n\n\\bibitem[Tomlin et~al.(2002)Tomlin, Pappas, and Sastry]{tomlin2002conflict}\nClaire Tomlin, George~J Pappas, and Shankar Sastry.\n\\newblock Conflict resolution for air traffic management: A study in multiagent hybrid systems.\n\\newblock \\emph{IEEE Transactions on automatic control}, 43\\penalty0 (4):\\penalty0 509--521, 2002.\n\n\\bibitem[Ames et~al.(2016)Ames, Xu, Grizzle, and Tabuada]{ames2016control}\nAaron~D Ames, Xiangru Xu, Jessy~W Grizzle, and Paulo Tabuada.\n\\newblock Control barrier function based quadratic programs for safety critical systems.\n\\newblock \\emph{IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control}, 62\\penalty0 (8):\\penalty0 3861--3876, 2016.\n\n\\bibitem[Ames et~al.(2019)Ames, Coogan, Egerstedt, Notomista, Sreenath, and Tabuada]{ames2019control}\nAaron~D Ames, Samuel Coogan, Magnus Egerstedt, Gennaro Notomista, Koushil Sreenath, and Paulo Tabuada.\n\\newblock Control barrier functions: Theory and applications.\n\\newblock In \\emph{2019 18th European control conference (ECC)}, pages 3420--3431. Ieee, 2019.\n\n\\bibitem[Blanchini(1999)]{blanchini1999set}\nFranco Blanchini.\n\\newblock Set invariance in control.\n\\newblock \\emph{Automatica}, 35\\penalty0 (11):\\penalty0 1747--1767, 1999.\n\n\\bibitem[Berkenkamp et~al.(2017)Berkenkamp, Turchetta, Schoellig, and Krause]{berkenkamp2017safe}\nFelix Berkenkamp, Matteo Turchetta, Angela Schoellig, and Andreas Krause.\n\\newblock Safe model-based reinforcement learning with stability guarantees.\n\\newblock \\emph{Advances in neural information processing systems}, 30, 2017.\n\n\\bibitem[Dalal et~al.(2018)Dalal, Gilboa, Mannor, and Schumann]{dalal2018safe}\nGal Dalal, Daniel Gilboa, Shie Mannor, and Andreas Schumann.\n\\newblock Safe exploration in continuous action spaces.\n\\newblock In \\emph{International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)}, 2018.\n\n\\bibitem[Thananjeyan et~al.(2021)Thananjeyan, Balakrishna, Nair, et~al.]{thananjeyan2021recovery}\nBrijen Thananjeyan, Ashwin Balakrishna, Suraj Nair, et~al.\n\\newblock Recovery rl: Safe reinforcement learning with learned recovery zones.\n\\newblock \\emph{Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS)}, 2021.\n\n\\bibitem[Brunke et~al.(2025)Brunke, Zhang, Römer, Naimer, Staykov, Zhou, and Schoellig]{brunke2025semanticallysaferobotmanipulation}\nLukas Brunke, Yanni Zhang, Ralf Römer, Jack Naimer, Nikola Staykov, Siqi Zhou, and Angela~P. Schoellig.\n\\newblock Semantically safe robot manipulation: From semantic scene understanding to motion safeguards, 2025.\n\\newblock URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.15185}.\n\n\\bibitem[Ni et~al.(2025)Ni, Zhang, Chen, Bai, Chen, Zhang, Zhang, and Zuo]{ni2025dontletrobotharmful}\nMinheng Ni, Lei Zhang, Zihan Chen, Kaixin Bai, Zhaopeng Chen, Jianwei Zhang, Lei Zhang, and Wangmeng Zuo.\n\\newblock Don't let your robot be harmful: Responsible robotic manipulation via safety-as-policy, 2025.\n\\newblock URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18289}.\n\n\\bibitem[Bahety et~al.(2025)Bahety, Balaji, Abbatematteo, and Martín-Martín]{bahety2025safemimic}\nArpit Bahety, Arnav Balaji, Ben Abbatematteo, and Roberto Martín-Martín.\n\\newblock Safemimic: Towards safe and autonomous human-to-robot imitation for mobile manipulation, 2025.\n\\newblock URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15847}.\n\n\\bibitem[Nakamura et~al.(2025)Nakamura, Peters, and Bajcsy]{Nakamura_2025}\nKensuke Nakamura, Lasse Peters, and Andrea Bajcsy.\n\\newblock Generalizing safety beyond collision-avoidance via latent-space reachability analysis.\n\\newblock In \\emph{Robotics: Science and Systems XXI}, RSS2025. Robotics: Science and Systems Foundation, 2025.\n\\newblock \\doi{10.15607/rss.2025.xxi.113}.\n\\newblock URL \\url{http://dx.doi.org/10.15607/RSS.2025.XXI.113}.\n\n\\bibitem[Garcia and Fern{\\'a}ndez(2015)]{garcia2015survey}\nJavier Garcia and Fernando Fern{\\'a}ndez.\n\\newblock A comprehensive survey on safe reinforcement learning.\n\\newblock \\emph{Journal of Machine Learning Research}, 16:\\penalty0 1437--1480, 2015.\n\n\\bibitem[Ray et~al.(2019)Ray, Achiam, and Amodei]{ray2019benchmarking}\nAlex Ray, Joshua Achiam, and Dario Amodei.\n\\newblock Benchmarking safe exploration in deep reinforcement learning.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01708}, 7\\penalty0 (1):\\penalty0 2, 2019.\n\n\\bibitem[Ji et~al.(2023)Ji, Zhang, Zhou, Pan, Huang, Sun, Geng, Zhong, Dai, and Yang]{ji2023safety}\nJiaming Ji, Borong Zhang, Jiayi Zhou, Xuehai Pan, Weidong Huang, Ruiyang Sun, Yiran Geng, Yifan Zhong, Josef Dai, and Yaodong Yang.\n\\newblock Safety gymnasium: A unified safe reinforcement learning benchmark.\n\\newblock \\emph{Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems}, 36:\\penalty0 18964--18993, 2023.\n\n\\bibitem[Yuan et~al.(2022)Yuan, Hall, Zhou, Brunke, Greeff, Panerati, and Schoellig]{yuan2022safe}\nZhaocong Yuan, Adam~W Hall, Siqi Zhou, Lukas Brunke, Melissa Greeff, Jacopo Panerati, and Angela~P Schoellig.\n\\newblock Safe-control-gym: A unified benchmark suite for safe learning-based control and reinforcement learning in robotics.\n\\newblock \\emph{IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters}, 7\\penalty0 (4):\\penalty0 11142--11149, 2022.\n\n\\bibitem[Zhao et~al.(2023)Zhao, Sun, Li, Chen, Liu, Wei, and Liu]{zhao2023guard}\nWeiye Zhao, Yifan Sun, Feihan Li, Rui Chen, Ruixuan Liu, Tianhao Wei, and Changliu Liu.\n\\newblock Guard: A safe reinforcement learning benchmark.\n\\newblock \\emph{Transactions on Machine Learning Research}, 2023.\n\n\\bibitem[Leike et~al.(2017)Leike, Martic, Krakovna, Ortega, Everitt, Lefrancq, Orseau, and Legg]{leike2017aisafetygridworlds}\nJan Leike, Miljan Martic, Victoria Krakovna, Pedro~A. Ortega, Tom Everitt, Andrew Lefrancq, Laurent Orseau, and Shane Legg.\n\\newblock Ai safety gridworlds, 2017.\n\\newblock URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.09883}.\n\n\\bibitem[Liu et~al.(2023)Liu, Guo, Lin, Yao, Zhu, Cen, Hu, Yu, Zhang, Tan, and Zhao]{liu2023datasetsbenchmarksofflinesafe}\nZuxin Liu, Zijian Guo, Haohong Lin, Yihang Yao, Jiacheng Zhu, Zhepeng Cen, Hanjiang Hu, Wenhao Yu, Tingnan Zhang, Jie Tan, and Ding Zhao.\n\\newblock Datasets and benchmarks for offline safe reinforcement learning, 2023.\n\\newblock URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.09303}.\n\n\\bibitem[Yiran et~al.(2025)Yiran, Ji, Chen, Haoran, Zhong, and Yang]{redman}\nGeng Yiran, Jiaming Ji, Yuanpei Chen, Geng Haoran, Fangwei Zhong, and Yaodong Yang.\n\\newblock Redman: reliable dexterous manipulation with safe reinforcement learning.\n\\newblock \\emph{Machine Learning}, 114, 07 2025.\n\\newblock \\doi{10.1007/s10994-025-06825-x}.\n\n\\bibitem[Tomilin et~al.(2025)Tomilin, Fang, and Pechenizkiy]{tomilin2025hasard}\nTristan Tomilin, Meng Fang, and Mykola Pechenizkiy.\n\\newblock Hasard: A benchmark for vision-based safe reinforcement learning in embodied agents.\n\\newblock In \\emph{The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations}, 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Kaelbling et~al.(1998)Kaelbling, Littman, and Cassandra]{Kaelbling1998PlanningAA}\nLeslie~Pack Kaelbling, Michael~L. Littman, and Anthony~R. Cassandra.\n\\newblock Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains.\n\\newblock \\emph{Artif. Intell.}, 101:\\penalty0 99--134, 1998.\n\\newblock URL \\url{https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:5613003}.\n\n\\bibitem[Arnold et~al.(2017)Arnold, Kasenberg, and Scheutz]{arnold2017value}\nThomas Arnold, Daniel Kasenberg, and Matthias Scheutz.\n\\newblock Value alignment or misalignment-what will keep systems accountable?\n\\newblock In \\emph{AAAI Workshops}, pages 81--88, 2017.\n\n\\bibitem[Anderson(2017)]{Anderson2017FractureMechanics}\nT.~L. Anderson.\n\\newblock \\emph{Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications}.\n\\newblock CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 4 edition, 2017.\n\\newblock ISBN 978-1-4987-2813-3.\n\\newblock \\doi{10.1201/9781315370293}.\n\n\\bibitem[Johnson(1987)]{johnson1987contact}\nKenneth~Langstreth Johnson.\n\\newblock \\emph{Contact mechanics}.\n\\newblock Cambridge university press, 1987.\n\n\\bibitem[Callister~Jr and Rethwisch(2020)]{callister2020materials}\nWilliam~D Callister~Jr and David~G Rethwisch.\n\\newblock \\emph{Materials science and engineering: an introduction}.\n\\newblock John wiley \\& sons, 2020.\n\n\\bibitem[Lipman et~al.(2023)Lipman, Chen, Ben-Hamu, Nickel, and Le]{lipman2023flowmatchinggenerativemodeling}\nYaron Lipman, Ricky T.~Q. Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nickel, and Matt Le.\n\\newblock Flow matching for generative modeling, 2023.\n\\newblock URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02747}.\n\n\\bibitem[Wagenmaker et~al.(2025)Wagenmaker, Nakamoto, Zhang, Park, Yagoub, Nagabandi, Gupta, and Levine]{wagenmaker2025steeringdiffusionpolicylatent}\nAndrew Wagenmaker, Mitsuhiko Nakamoto, Yunchu Zhang, Seohong Park, Waleed Yagoub, Anusha Nagabandi, Abhishek Gupta, and Sergey Levine.\n\\newblock Steering your diffusion policy with latent space reinforcement learning, 2025.\n\\newblock URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15799}.\n\n\\bibitem[Schulman et~al.(2017{\\natexlab{a}})Schulman, Wolski, Dhariwal, Radford, and Klimov]{schulman2017proximal}\nJohn Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov.\n\\newblock Proximal policy optimization algorithms.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347}, 2017{\\natexlab{a}}.\n\n\\bibitem[NVIDIA et~al.(2025)NVIDIA, Johan Bjorck~andFernando Castañeda, Da, Ding, Fan, Fang, Fox, Hu, Huang, Jang, Jiang, Kautz, Kundalia, Lao, Li, Lin, Lin, Liu, Llontop, Magne, Mandlekar, Narayan, Nasiriany, Reed, Tan, Wang, Wang, Wang, Wang, Xiang, Xie, Xu, Xu, Ye, Yu, Zhang, Zhang, Zhao, Zheng, and Zhu]{gr00tn1_2025}\nNVIDIA, Nikita~Cherniadev Johan Bjorck~andFernando Castañeda, Xingye Da, Runyu Ding, Linxi~\"Jim\" Fan, Yu~Fang, Dieter Fox, Fengyuan Hu, Spencer Huang, Joel Jang, Zhenyu Jiang, Jan Kautz, Kaushil Kundalia, Lawrence Lao, Zhiqi Li, Zongyu Lin, Kevin Lin, Guilin Liu, Edith Llontop, Loic Magne, Ajay Mandlekar, Avnish Narayan, Soroush Nasiriany, Scott Reed, You~Liang Tan, Guanzhi Wang, Zu~Wang, Jing Wang, Qi~Wang, Jiannan Xiang, Yuqi Xie, Yinzhen Xu, Zhenjia Xu, Seonghyeon Ye, Zhiding Yu, Ao~Zhang, Hao Zhang, Yizhou Zhao, Ruijie Zheng, and Yuke Zhu.\n\\newblock {GR00T} {N1}: An open foundation model for generalist humanoid robots.\n\\newblock In \\emph{ArXiv Preprint}, March 2025.\n\n\\bibitem[Black et~al.(2026)Black, Brown, Driess, Esmail, Equi, Finn, Fusai, Groom, Hausman, Ichter, Jakubczak, Jones, Ke, Levine, Li-Bell, Mothukuri, Nair, Pertsch, Shi, Tanner, Vuong, Walling, Wang, and Zhilinsky]{black2026pi0visionlanguageactionflowmodel}\nKevin Black, Noah Brown, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, Lachy Groom, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, Szymon Jakubczak, Tim Jones, Liyiming Ke, Sergey Levine, Adrian Li-Bell, Mohith Mothukuri, Suraj Nair, Karl Pertsch, Lucy~Xiaoyang Shi, James Tanner, Quan Vuong, Anna Walling, Haohuan Wang, and Ury Zhilinsky.\n\\newblock $\\pi_0$: A vision-language-action flow model for general robot control, 2026.\n\\newblock URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.24164}.\n\n\\bibitem[Black et~al.(2024)Black, Brown, Driess, Esmail, Equi, Finn, Fusai, Groom, Hausman, Ichter, et~al.]{black2024pi_0}\nKevin Black, Noah Brown, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, Lachy Groom, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, et~al.\n\\newblock $\\pi_0$: A vision-language-action flow model for general robot control.\n\\newblock \\emph{arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24164}, 2024.\n\n\\bibitem[Schulman et~al.(2017{\\natexlab{b}})Schulman, Wolski, Dhariwal, Radford, and Klimov]{schulman2017proximalpolicyoptimizationalgorithms}\nJohn Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov.\n\\newblock Proximal policy optimization algorithms, 2017{\\natexlab{b}}.\n\\newblock URL \\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06347}.\n\n\\end{thebibliography}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[conference]{IEEEtran}\n\\input{packages}\n\\pdfinfo{\n /Author (Homer Simpson)\n /Title (Robots: Our new overlords)\n /CreationDate (D:20101201120000)\n /Subject (Robots)\n /Keywords (Robots;Overlords)\n}\n\n\\newcommand{\\methodname}{\\textls[-25]{\\textsc{OopsieVerse}}}\n\\newcommand{\\simname}{\\textls[-25]{\\textsc{DamageSim}}}\n\\newcommand{\\benchname}{\\textls[-25]{\\textsc{OopsieBench}}}\n\\newcommand{\\roberto}[1]{\\textcolor{red}{ R: #1}}\n\\newcommand{\\arpit}[1]{\\textcolor{pink}{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\arnav}[1]{{\\color{orange}{\\bf [Arnav: #1]}}}\n\\newcommand{\\rebuttal}[1]{\\textcolor{blue}{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\sriniket}[1]{\\textcolor{green}{#1}}\n\\begin{document}\n\n% paper title\n% \\title{SafeMimic: Towards Fully Autonomous Safe Human-to-Robot Imitation for Mobile Manipulation}\n\\title{\\textls[-25]{\\textsc{OopsieVerse}}: A Safety Benchmark with Damage-Aware Simulation for Robot Manipulation}\n\n% You will get a Paper-ID when submitting a pdf file to the conference system\n\\author{Arnav Balaji*, Arpit Bahety*, Sriniket Ambatipudi, Daniel Lam, Junhong Xu, Roberto Mart\\'in-Mart\\'in \\\\ The University of Texas at Austin \\\\ *Equal Contribution; order by dice roll}\n\n%\\author{\\authorblockN{Michael Shell}\n%\\authorblockA{School of Electrical and\\\\Computer Engineering\\\\\n%Georgia Institute of Technology\\\\\n%Atlanta, Georgia 30332--0250\\\\\n%Email: mshell@ece.gatech.edu}\n%\\and\n%\\authorblockN{Homer Simpson}\n%\\authorblockA{Twentieth Century Fox\\\\\n%Springfield, USA\\\\\n%Email: homer@thesimpsons.com}\n%\\and\n%\\authorblockN{James Kirk\\\\ and Montgomery Scott}\n%\\authorblockA{Starfleet Academy\\\\\n%San Francisco, California 96678-2391\\\\\n%Telephone: (800) 555--1212\\\\\n%Fax: (888) 555--1212}}\n\n\n% avoiding spaces at the end of the author lines is not a problem with\n% conference papers because we don't use \\thanks or \\IEEEmembership\n\n\n% for over three affiliations, or if they all won't fit within the width\n% of the page, use this alternative format:\n% \n%\\author{\\authorblockN{Michael Shell\\authorrefmark{1},\n%Homer Simpson\\authorrefmark{2},\n%James Kirk\\authorrefmark{3}, \n%Montgomery Scott\\authorrefmark{3} and\n%Eldon Tyrell\\authorrefmark{4}}\n%\\authorblockA{\\authorrefmark{1}School of Electrical and Computer Engineering\\\\\n%Georgia Institute of Technology,\n%Atlanta, Georgia 30332--0250\\\\ Email: mshell@ece.gatech.edu}\n%\\authorblockA{\\authorrefmark{2}Twentieth Century Fox, Springfield, USA\\\\\n%Email: homer@thesimpsons.com}\n%\\authorblockA{\\authorrefmark{3}Starfleet Academy, San Francisco, California 96678-2391\\\\\n%Telephone: (800) 555--1212, Fax: (888) 555--1212}\n%\\authorblockA{\\authorrefmark{4}Tyrell Inc., 123 Replicant Street, Los Angeles, California 90210--4321}}\n\n\n\\maketitle\n\\IEEEpeerreviewmaketitle\n\n\\input{00-abstract}\n\\input{01-intro}\n\\input{02-related}\n\\input{03a-simulator}\n\\input{03b-benchmark}\n\\input{04-experiments}\n\\input{05-conclusion}\n% \\section*{Acknowledgments}\n% \\bibliographystyle{plainnat}\n\\bibliographystyle{unsrtnat}\n\\bibliography{references}\n\n\\input{06-appendix}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: packages.tex\n================================================\n\\PassOptionsToPackage{export}{adjustbox}\n\\usepackage{times}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{multirow}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{amssymb}\n\\usepackage{algorithm}\n\\usepackage{algpseudocode}\n\\usepackage{gensymb}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{tablefootnote}\n\\usepackage{makecell}\n\\usepackage{twemojis}\n\\usepackage{microtype}\n\\let\\labelindent\\relax\n\\usepackage[inline]{enumitem}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{subcaption}\n\\usepackage{lipsum}\n\\usepackage{overpic}\n\\usepackage{tabularx}\n\\usepackage{enumitem}\n\n% numbers option provides compact numerical references in the text. \n\\usepackage[numbers]{natbib}\n\\usepackage{multicol}\n\\usepackage[bookmarks=true]{hyperref}\n\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage[export]{adjustbox}\n\\definecolor{darkgreen}{rgb}{0.0, 0.2, 0.13}\n\n\\captionsetup[figure]{font=small}\n\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: references.bib\n================================================\n@misc{tomilin2025hasardbenchmarkvisionbasedsafe,\n title={HASARD: A Benchmark for Vision-Based Safe Reinforcement Learning in Embodied Agents}, \n author={Tristan Tomilin and Meng Fang and Mykola Pechenizkiy},\n year={2025},\n eprint={2503.08241},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.AI},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08241}, \n}\n\n@inproceedings{dalal2018safe,\n title={Safe exploration in continuous action spaces},\n author={Dalal, Gal and Gilboa, Daniel and Mannor, Shie and Schumann, Andreas},\n booktitle={International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)},\n year={2018}\n}\n\n@article{ray2019benchmarking,\n title={Benchmarking safe exploration in deep reinforcement learning},\n author={Ray, Alex and Achiam, Joshua and Amodei, Dario},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01708},\n volume={7},\n number={1},\n pages={2},\n year={2019}\n}\n\n\n@article{ji2023safety,\n title={Safety gymnasium: A unified safe reinforcement learning benchmark},\n author={Ji, Jiaming and Zhang, Borong and Zhou, Jiayi and Pan, Xuehai and Huang, Weidong and Sun, Ruiyang and Geng, Yiran and Zhong, Yifan and Dai, Josef and Yang, Yaodong},\n journal={Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},\n volume={36},\n pages={18964--18993},\n year={2023}\n}\n\n@article{yuan2022safe,\n title={Safe-control-gym: A unified benchmark suite for safe learning-based control and reinforcement learning in robotics},\n author={Yuan, Zhaocong and Hall, Adam W and Zhou, Siqi and Brunke, Lukas and Greeff, Melissa and Panerati, Jacopo and Schoellig, Angela P},\n journal={IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters},\n volume={7},\n number={4},\n pages={11142--11149},\n year={2022},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n\n@article{zhao2023guard,\n title={GUARD: A Safe Reinforcement Learning Benchmark},\nyear={2023},\n author={Zhao, Weiye and Sun, Yifan and Li, Feihan and Chen, Rui and Liu, Ruixuan and Wei, Tianhao and Liu, Changliu},\n journal={Transactions on Machine Learning Research}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{tomilin2025hasard,\n title={HASARD: A Benchmark for Vision-Based Safe Reinforcement Learning in Embodied Agents},\n author={Tomilin, Tristan and Fang, Meng and Pechenizkiy, Mykola},\n year={2025},\n booktitle={The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations}\n}\n\n@book{callister2020materials,\n title={Materials science and engineering: an introduction},\n author={Callister Jr, William D and Rethwisch, David G},\n year={2020},\n publisher={John wiley \\& sons}\n}\n\n@book{johnson1987contact,\n title={Contact mechanics},\n author={Johnson, Kenneth Langstreth},\n year={1987},\n publisher={Cambridge university press}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{todorov2012mujoco,\n title={Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control},\n author={Todorov, Emanuel and Erez, Tom and Tassa, Yuval},\n booktitle={2012 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems},\n pages={5026--5033},\n year={2012},\n organization={IEEE}\n}\n\n@article{nasiriany2024robocasa,\n title={Robocasa: Large-scale simulation of everyday tasks for generalist robots},\n author={Nasiriany, Soroush and Maddukuri, Abhiram and Zhang, Lance and Parikh, Adeet and Lo, Aaron and Joshi, Abhishek and Mandlekar, Ajay and Zhu, Yuke},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02523},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@article{thananjeyan2021recovery,\n title={Recovery RL: Safe reinforcement learning with learned recovery zones},\n author={Thananjeyan, Brijen and Balakrishna, Ashwin and Nair, Suraj and others},\n journal={Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS)},\n year={2021}\n}\n\n@article{garcia2015survey,\n title={A comprehensive survey on safe reinforcement learning},\n author={Garcia, Javier and Fern{\\'a}ndez, Fernando},\n journal={Journal of Machine Learning Research},\n volume={16},\n pages={1437--1480},\n year={2015}\n}\n\n@article{berkenkamp2017safe,\n title={Safe model-based reinforcement learning with stability guarantees},\n author={Berkenkamp, Felix and Turchetta, Matteo and Schoellig, Angela and Krause, Andreas},\n journal={Advances in neural information processing systems},\n volume={30},\n year={2017}\n}\n\n@article{blanchini1999set,\n title={Set invariance in control},\n author={Blanchini, Franco},\n journal={Automatica},\n volume={35},\n number={11},\n pages={1747--1767},\n year={1999},\n publisher={Elsevier}\n}\n\n@article{ames2016control,\n title={Control barrier function based quadratic programs for safety critical systems},\n author={Ames, Aaron D and Xu, Xiangru and Grizzle, Jessy W and Tabuada, Paulo},\n journal={IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control},\n volume={62},\n number={8},\n pages={3861--3876},\n year={2016},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{ames2019control,\n title={Control barrier functions: Theory and applications},\n author={Ames, Aaron D and Coogan, Samuel and Egerstedt, Magnus and Notomista, Gennaro and Sreenath, Koushil and Tabuada, Paulo},\n booktitle={2019 18th European control conference (ECC)},\n pages={3420--3431},\n year={2019},\n organization={Ieee}\n}\n\n@article{tomlin2002conflict,\n title={Conflict resolution for air traffic management: A study in multiagent hybrid systems},\n author={Tomlin, Claire and Pappas, George J and Sastry, Shankar},\n journal={IEEE Transactions on automatic control},\n volume={43},\n number={4},\n pages={509--521},\n year={2002},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n\n@article{mitchell2005time,\n title={A time-dependent Hamilton-Jacobi formulation of reachable sets for continuous dynamic games},\n author={Mitchell, Ian M and Bayen, Alexandre M and Tomlin, Claire J},\n journal={IEEE Transactions on automatic control},\n volume={50},\n number={7},\n pages={947--957},\n year={2005},\n publisher={IEEE}\n}\n\n@misc{ji2024safetygymnasiumunifiedsafereinforcement,\n title={Safety-Gymnasium: A Unified Safe Reinforcement Learning Benchmark}, \n author={Jiaming Ji and Borong Zhang and Jiayi Zhou and Xuehai Pan and Weidong Huang and Ruiyang Sun and Yiran Geng and Yifan Zhong and Juntao Dai and Yaodong Yang},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2310.12567},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.AI},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12567}, \n}\n\n@misc{leike2017aisafetygridworlds,\n title={AI Safety Gridworlds}, \n author={Jan Leike and Miljan Martic and Victoria Krakovna and Pedro A. Ortega and Tom Everitt and Andrew Lefrancq and Laurent Orseau and Shane Legg},\n year={2017},\n eprint={1711.09883},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.LG},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.09883}, \n}\n\n@misc{yuan2022safecontrolgymunifiedbenchmarksuite,\n title={safe-control-gym: a Unified Benchmark Suite for Safe Learning-based Control and Reinforcement Learning in Robotics}, \n author={Zhaocong Yuan and Adam W. Hall and Siqi Zhou and Lukas Brunke and Melissa Greeff and Jacopo Panerati and Angela P. Schoellig},\n year={2022},\n eprint={2109.06325},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.RO},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.06325}, \n}\n\n@inproceedings{Achiam2019BenchmarkingSE,\n title={Benchmarking Safe Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning},\n author={Josh Achiam and Dario Amodei},\n year={2019},\n url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:208283920}\n}\n\n@misc{li2024behavior1khumancenteredembodiedai,\n title={BEHAVIOR-1K: A Human-Centered, Embodied AI Benchmark with 1,000 Everyday Activities and Realistic Simulation}, \n author={Chengshu Li and Ruohan Zhang and Josiah Wong and Cem Gokmen and Sanjana Srivastava and Roberto Martín-Martín and Chen Wang and Gabrael Levine and Wensi Ai and Benjamin Martinez and Hang Yin and Michael Lingelbach and Minjune Hwang and Ayano Hiranaka and Sujay Garlanka and Arman Aydin and Sharon Lee and Jiankai Sun and Mona Anvari and Manasi Sharma and Dhruva Bansal and Samuel Hunter and Kyu-Young Kim and Alan Lou and Caleb R Matthews and Ivan Villa-Renteria and Jerry Huayang Tang and Claire Tang and Fei Xia and Yunzhu Li and Silvio Savarese and Hyowon Gweon and C. Karen Liu and Jiajun Wu and Li Fei-Fei},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2403.09227},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.RO},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09227}, \n}\n\n@misc{zhu2025robosuitemodularsimulationframework,\n title={robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learning}, \n author={Yuke Zhu and Josiah Wong and Ajay Mandlekar and Roberto Martín-Martín and Abhishek Joshi and Kevin Lin and Abhiram Maddukuri and Soroush Nasiriany and Yifeng Zhu},\n year={2025},\n eprint={2009.12293},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.RO},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.12293}, \n}\n\n@misc{mu2021maniskillgeneralizablemanipulationskill,\n title={ManiSkill: Generalizable Manipulation Skill Benchmark with Large-Scale Demonstrations}, \n author={Tongzhou Mu and Zhan Ling and Fanbo Xiang and Derek Yang and Xuanlin Li and Stone Tao and Zhiao Huang and Zhiwei Jia and Hao Su},\n year={2021},\n eprint={2107.14483},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.LG},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.14483}, \n}\n\n@misc{schulman2017proximalpolicyoptimizationalgorithms,\n title={Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms}, \n author={John Schulman and Filip Wolski and Prafulla Dhariwal and Alec Radford and Oleg Klimov},\n year={2017},\n eprint={1707.06347},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.LG},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06347}, \n}\n\n@article{Kaelbling1998PlanningAA,\n title={Planning and Acting in Partially Observable Stochastic Domains},\n author={Leslie Pack Kaelbling and Michael L. Littman and Anthony R. Cassandra},\n journal={Artif. Intell.},\n year={1998},\n volume={101},\n pages={99-134},\n url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:5613003}\n}\n\n@misc{zhao2024guardsafereinforcementlearning,\n title={GUARD: A Safe Reinforcement Learning Benchmark}, \n author={Weiye Zhao and Yifan Sun and Feihan Li and Rui Chen and Ruixuan Liu and Tianhao Wei and Changliu Liu},\n year={2024},\n eprint={2305.13681},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.LG},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.13681}, \n}\n\n@misc{brunke2025semanticallysaferobotmanipulation,\n title={Semantically Safe Robot Manipulation: From Semantic Scene Understanding to Motion Safeguards}, \n author={Lukas Brunke and Yanni Zhang and Ralf Römer and Jack Naimer and Nikola Staykov and Siqi Zhou and Angela P. Schoellig},\n year={2025},\n eprint={2410.15185},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.RO},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.15185}, \n}\n\n@misc{ni2025dontletrobotharmful,\n title={Don't Let Your Robot be Harmful: Responsible Robotic Manipulation via Safety-as-Policy}, \n author={Minheng Ni and Lei Zhang and Zihan Chen and Kaixin Bai and Zhaopeng Chen and Jianwei Zhang and Lei Zhang and Wangmeng Zuo},\n year={2025},\n eprint={2411.18289},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.RO},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18289}, \n}\n\n@misc{ak2023learningfailurepreventionskills,\n title={Learning Failure Prevention Skills for Safe Robot Manipulation}, \n author={Abdullah Cihan Ak and Eren Erdal Aksoy and Sanem Sariel},\n year={2023},\n eprint={2305.02807},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.RO},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02807}, \n}\n\n@book{Sutton1998,\n added-at = {2019-07-13T10:11:53.000+0200},\n author = {Sutton, Richard S. and Barto, Andrew G.},\n biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2f46601cf8b13d39d1378af0d79438b12/lanteunis},\n edition = {Second},\n interhash = {ac6b144aaec1819919a2fba9f705c852},\n intrahash = {f46601cf8b13d39d1378af0d79438b12},\n keywords = {},\n publisher = {The MIT Press},\n timestamp = {2019-07-13T10:11:53.000+0200},\n title = {Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction},\n url = {http://incompleteideas.net/book/the-book-2nd.html},\n year = {2018 }\n}\n\n@inproceedings{gr00tn1_2025,\n archivePrefix = {arxiv},\n eprint = {2503.14734},\n title = {{GR00T} {N1}: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robots},\n author = {NVIDIA and Johan Bjorck andFernando Castañeda, Nikita Cherniadev and Xingye Da and Runyu Ding and Linxi \"Jim\" Fan and Yu Fang and Dieter Fox and Fengyuan Hu and Spencer Huang and Joel Jang and Zhenyu Jiang and Jan Kautz and Kaushil Kundalia and Lawrence Lao and Zhiqi Li and Zongyu Lin and Kevin Lin and Guilin Liu and Edith Llontop and Loic Magne and Ajay Mandlekar and Avnish Narayan and Soroush Nasiriany and Scott Reed and You Liang Tan and Guanzhi Wang and Zu Wang and Jing Wang and Qi Wang and Jiannan Xiang and Yuqi Xie and Yinzhen Xu and Zhenjia Xu and Seonghyeon Ye and Zhiding Yu and Ao Zhang and Hao Zhang and Yizhou Zhao and Ruijie Zheng and Yuke Zhu},\n month = {March},\n year = {2025},\n booktitle = {ArXiv Preprint},\n}\n\n@misc{lipman2023flowmatchinggenerativemodeling,\n title={Flow Matching for Generative Modeling}, \n author={Yaron Lipman and Ricky T. Q. Chen and Heli Ben-Hamu and Maximilian Nickel and Matt Le},\n year={2023},\n eprint={2210.02747},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.LG},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02747}, \n}\n\n@misc{wagenmaker2025steeringdiffusionpolicylatent,\n title={Steering Your Diffusion Policy with Latent Space Reinforcement Learning}, \n author={Andrew Wagenmaker and Mitsuhiko Nakamoto and Yunchu Zhang and Seohong Park and Waleed Yagoub and Anusha Nagabandi and Abhishek Gupta and Sergey Levine},\n year={2025},\n eprint={2506.15799},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.RO},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15799}, \n}\n\n@article{schulman2017proximal,\n title={Proximal policy optimization algorithms},\n author={Schulman, John and Wolski, Filip and Dhariwal, Prafulla and Radford, Alec and Klimov, Oleg},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347},\n year={2017}\n}\n\n@misc{nvidia_omniverse_dev_overview,\n author = {{NVIDIA}},\n title = {NVIDIA Omniverse Developer Overview},\n howpublished = {\\url{https://docs.omniverse.nvidia.com/dev-overview/latest/index.html}},\n note = {Accessed 2026-01-31}\n}\n@inproceedings{arnold2017value,\n title={Value alignment or misalignment-what will keep systems accountable?},\n author={Arnold, Thomas and Kasenberg, Daniel and Scheutz, Matthias},\n booktitle={AAAI Workshops},\n pages={81--88},\n year={2017}\n}\n\n@book{Anderson2017FractureMechanics,\n author={Anderson, T. L.},\n title={Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications},\n edition={4},\n year={2017},\n publisher={CRC Press},\n address={Boca Raton, FL},\n isbn={978-1-4987-2813-3},\n doi={10.1201/9781315370293}\n}\n\n@misc{bahety2025safemimic,\n title={SafeMimic: Towards Safe and Autonomous Human-to-Robot Imitation for Mobile Manipulation}, \n author={Arpit Bahety and Arnav Balaji and Ben Abbatematteo and Roberto Martín-Martín},\n year={2025},\n eprint={2506.15847},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.RO},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15847}, \n}\n\n@article{black2024pi_0,\n title={$\\pi_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control},\n author={Black, Kevin and Brown, Noah and Driess, Danny and Esmail, Adnan and Equi, Michael and Finn, Chelsea and Fusai, Niccolo and Groom, Lachy and Hausman, Karol and Ichter, Brian and others},\n journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24164},\n year={2024}\n}\n\n@misc{black2026pi0visionlanguageactionflowmodel,\n title={$\\pi_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control}, \n author={Kevin Black and Noah Brown and Danny Driess and Adnan Esmail and Michael Equi and Chelsea Finn and Niccolo Fusai and Lachy Groom and Karol Hausman and Brian Ichter and Szymon Jakubczak and Tim Jones and Liyiming Ke and Sergey Levine and Adrian Li-Bell and Mohith Mothukuri and Suraj Nair and Karl Pertsch and Lucy Xiaoyang Shi and James Tanner and Quan Vuong and Anna Walling and Haohuan Wang and Ury Zhilinsky},\n year={2026},\n eprint={2410.24164},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.LG},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.24164}, \n}\n\n@misc{liu2023datasetsbenchmarksofflinesafe,\n title={Datasets and Benchmarks for Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning}, \n author={Zuxin Liu and Zijian Guo and Haohong Lin and Yihang Yao and Jiacheng Zhu and Zhepeng Cen and Hanjiang Hu and Wenhao Yu and Tingnan Zhang and Jie Tan and Ding Zhao},\n year={2023},\n eprint={2306.09303},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={cs.LG},\n url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.09303}, \n}\n\n@article{redman,\nauthor = {Yiran, Geng and Ji, Jiaming and Chen, Yuanpei and Haoran, Geng and Zhong, Fangwei and Yang, Yaodong},\nyear = {2025},\nmonth = {07},\npages = {},\ntitle = {ReDMan: reliable dexterous manipulation with safe reinforcement learning},\nvolume = {114},\njournal = {Machine Learning},\ndoi = {10.1007/s10994-025-06825-x}\n}\n\n@inproceedings{Nakamura_2025, series={RSS2025},\n title={Generalizing Safety Beyond Collision-Avoidance via Latent-Space Reachability Analysis},\n url={http://dx.doi.org/10.15607/RSS.2025.XXI.113},\n DOI={10.15607/rss.2025.xxi.113},\n booktitle={Robotics: Science and Systems XXI},\n publisher={Robotics: Science and Systems Foundation},\n author={Nakamura, Kensuke and Peters, Lasse and Bajcsy, Andrea},\n year={2025},\n month=June, collection={RSS2025} }\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091194,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31994"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31994"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Antonela Matija\\v{s}i\\'c"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Antonela Matija\\v{s}i\\'c"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"The geometric bookkeeping guide for $\\varepsilon$-factorised differential equations"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"8 pages, 1 figure; talk presented at Loops and Legs in Quantum Field Theory 2026"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"hep-th hep-ph"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"Precision predictions for high-energy experiments rely on accurately evaluating multi-loop, multi-scale Feynman integrals in dimensional regularisation. The method of differential equations is by now the standard tool for this task, but its full power is only realised when the system can be brought into an $\\varepsilon$-factorised form. In this talk, we present an algorithmic framework that systematically constructs $\\varepsilon$-factorised differential equations for arbitrary integral families, independent of their underlying geometry. We work in the setting of twisted cohomology and study the space of differential forms associated with a given family of Feynman integrals in the Baikov representation. Our approach consists of two steps. First, we introduce a particular ordering for the Laporta algorithm that orders Feynman integrals within a sector according to their geometric properties. We observe that this order relation yields a basis whose differential equation is in a Laurent polynomial form in the dimensional regulator $\\varepsilon$. In the second step, we systematically construct transformation matrices such that the resulting system is in the $\\varepsilon$-factorised form."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:30:36 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:30:36 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Matijašić","Antonela",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Matijašić\",\n \"Antonela\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: pos.sty\n================================================\n%% pos.sty\n%% Copyright 2021 SISSA Medialab\n%\n% This work may be distributed and/or modified under the\n% conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3\n% of this license or (at your option) any later version.\n% The latest version of this license is in\n% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt\n% and version 1.3 or later is part of all distributions of LaTeX\n% version 2005/12/01 or later.\n%\n% This work has the LPPL maintenance status `author-maintained'.\n%\n% The Current Maintainer of this work is\n% SISSA Medialab <info@medialab.sissa.it>\n%\n% This work consists of the files pos.sty, PoSlogo.pdf and PoSlogo.ps.\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesPackage{pos} [2021/09/21 v2.2]\n\n\\RequirePackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\\RequirePackage[utf8]{inputenc}\n\n\\newif\\ifnatbibsort\\natbibsorttrue\\DeclareOption{no-natbib-sort}{\\natbibsortfalse}\n\\ProcessOptions\\relax\n\n\\RequirePackage{newtxtext}\n\\RequirePackage{amsthm} % before newtxmath because of macro \"\\openbox\" defined in both packages\n\\RequirePackage{newtxmath}\n\\def\\mathsterling{\\mbox{\\textsterling}}\n\\def\\pounds{\\mbox{\\textsterling}} % while waiting for new release of newtxmath from Michael Sharpe (2015/07)\n\\DeclareMathAlphabet{\\mathfrak}{U}{euf}{m}{n}\n\\SetMathAlphabet{\\mathfrak}{bold}{U}{euf}{b}{n}\n\\RequirePackage[zerostyle=e]{newtxtt}\n\\RequirePackage{amsmath}\n\\RequirePackage{graphicx}\n\\ifnatbibsort\\RequirePackage[numbers,sort&compress]{natbib}\\else\\RequirePackage[numbers,compress]{natbib}\\fi\n\\RequirePackage[font=small,labelfont=bf]{caption}\n\\RequirePackage{xcolor}\n\\definecolor{posurl}{cmyk}{.9 .9 0 0}\n\\RequirePackage[colorlinks=true\n,urlcolor=posurl\n,anchorcolor=posurl\n,citecolor=posurl\n,filecolor=posurl\n,linkcolor=posurl\n,menucolor=posurl\n,linktocpage=true\n,pdfa=true\n]{hyperref}\n\n\\newif\\ifdotoc\\dotocfalse\n\\newif\\ifemailadd\\emailaddfalse\n\\newif\\iftoccontinuous\\toccontinuousfalse\n\\newif\\ifshorttitle\\shorttitlefalse\n\\newif\\if@PoSspecialurl\\@PoSspecialurlfalse\n\n\\let\\oldthefootnote\\thefootnote\n\n\\RequirePackage{expl3}\n\\RequirePackage{xparse}\n\n\\ExplSyntaxOn\n\n%% a sequence of \"authors\" for the running headers\n\\seq_new:N \\l_authors_for_head_s\n\n%% a sequence of \"superscripts\"\n%% (in the same order as the authors)\n\\seq_new:N \\l_super_s\n\n%% a sequence of \"authors\"\n%% (in the same order as the superscripts)\n\\seq_new:N \\l_authors_s\n\n%% a boolean to indicate if the footnote for the speaker should be output\n\\bool_new:N\\l_do_speaker_note_bool\\bool_set_false:N\\l_do_speaker_note_bool\n\n%% a boolean to indicate authors should be manually separated by the\n%% operator or automatically by \",\" and \"and\"\n\\bool_new:N\\l_manually_separate_authors_bool\\bool_set_false:N\\l_manually_separate_authors_bool\n\\newcommand{\\manuallySeparateAuthors}{\\bool_set_true:N\\l_manually_separate_authors_bool}\n\n\\newcommand{\\speakerFlag}{\\ast}\n\\newcommand{\\speakerText}{Speaker}\n\n%% accumulate authors\n\\RenewDocumentCommand\\author{som}{%\n \\seq_put_right:Nn \\l_authors_s {#3}\n \\IfNoValueTF{#2} % test the optional argument\n { % no optional argument used\n\n \\IfBooleanTF#1 % test if we have the \"star\"\n {%\n % starred form (author*) means \"speaker\"\n % add this author to those for the running headers\n \\seq_put_right:Nn \\l_authors_for_head_s {#3}\n\n % save the superscripts with the same order as the authors\n \\seq_put_right:Nn \\l_super_s {\\speakerFlag}\n\n \\bool_set_true:N\\l_do_speaker_note_bool\n }\n {\n % save the superscripts with the same order as the authors\n \\seq_put_right:Nn \\l_super_s {{}}\n }\n }\n\n { % there is an optional argument\n \\IfBooleanTF#1 % test if we have the \"star\"\n {%\n % starred form (author*) means \"speaker\"\n % add this author to those for the running headers\n \\seq_put_right:Nn \\l_authors_for_head_s {#3}\n\n % save the superscripts with the same order as the authors\n \\seq_put_right:Nn \\l_super_s {#2,\\speakerFlag}\n\n \\bool_set_true:N\\l_do_speaker_note_bool\n }\n {\n % save the superscripts with the same order as the authors\n \\seq_put_right:Nn \\l_super_s {#2}\n }\n }\n}\n\n\\tl_new:N\\l_author_tl\n\\tl_new:N\\l_superscript_tl\n\\int_new:N\\l_num_authors_int\n\\str_new:N\\l_au_separator_pre_str\n\\str_new:N\\l_au_separator_post_str\n\\msg_new:nnn {PoS} {empty-head-authors} {No~speaker.~Please~add~a~\"*\"~to~the~macro~\\author}\n%% output\n\\newcommand{\\printAuthors}{%\n\n \\int_zero_new:N\\l_count_authors_int\n \\str_set:Nn\\l_au_separator_pre_str{,}\n \\str_set:Nn\\l_au_separator_post_str{~}\n\n % the number of authors\n \\int_set:Nn\\l_num_authors_int{\\seq_count:N\\l_authors_s}\n\n \\int_compare:nNnTF % If\n {\\l_num_authors_int} % the length of the authors\n = % is equal\n {1} % to 1\n { % then output the author:\n % get the author name and superscripts\n \\seq_pop_left:NN\\l_authors_s\\l_author_tl\n \\seq_pop_left:NN\\l_super_s\\l_superscript_tl\n\n \\tl_use:N\\l_author_tl$^{\\tl_use:N\\l_superscript_tl}$\n\n % It would be nice to also set the running header if necessary\n % but I was not able to do it.\n % I think it is because the headers are set before \\printAuthors is called,\n % so that \\l_author_tl is empty when the headers are set\n %\n %% \\seq_if_empty:NT\\l_authors_for_head_s{\n %% \\seq_gput_right:Nn \\l_authors_for_head_s {\\tl_use:N\\l_author_tl}\n %% }\n\n }\n { % otherwise output all\n % if the operator included the separations (\",\", \"and\")\n % simpy output the names\n \\bool_if:NTF\\l_manually_separate_authors_bool\n {\n \\bool_do_until:nn\n {\\seq_if_empty_p:N\\l_authors_s}\n {\n % get the author name and superscripts\n \\seq_pop_left:NN\\l_authors_s\\l_author_tl\n \\seq_pop_left:NN\\l_super_s\\l_superscript_tl\n \\tl_use:N\\l_author_tl\n $^{\\tl_use:N\\l_superscript_tl}$\n }\n }\n\n % otherwise separate automatically\n {\n \\bool_do_until:nn\n {\\seq_if_empty_p:N\\l_authors_s}\n {\n % get the author name and superscripts\n \\seq_pop_left:NN\\l_authors_s\\l_author_tl\n \\seq_pop_left:NN\\l_super_s\\l_superscript_tl\n\n % step the counter\n \\int_incr:N\\l_count_authors_int\n\n % if we are looking at the next-to-last author,\n % then change the separator\n \\int_compare:nNnT\n {\\l_count_authors_int}\n =\n {\\int_eval:n{\\l_num_authors_int - 1}}\n {\n \\str_set:Nn\\l_au_separator_pre_str{}\n \\str_set:Nn\\l_au_separator_post_str{~and~}\n % TODO: use {~and\\nobreakspace}\n }\n % if we are looking at the last author,\n % do not add anything at the end\n \\int_compare:nNnT\n {\\l_count_authors_int}\n =\n {\\l_num_authors_int}\n {\n \\str_set:Nn\\l_au_separator_pre_str{}\n \\str_set:Nn\\l_au_separator_post_str{}\n }\n \\tl_use:N\\l_author_tl\n \\str_use:N\\l_au_separator_pre_str\n $^{\\tl_use:N\\l_superscript_tl}$\n \\str_use:N\\l_au_separator_post_str\n }\n }\n }\n\n \\tl_use:N \\l_onbehalf_tl\n\n % display the speaker's foonote text if needed\n \\bool_if:NTF\\l_do_speaker_note_bool\n {\n \\begin{NoHyper}\n \\renewcommand\\thefootnote{$\\speakerFlag$}%\n \\footnotetext{\\speakerText}%\n \\stepcounter{footnote}%\n \\let\\thefootnote\\oldthefootnote%\n \\end{NoHyper}\n }\n {\n \\seq_if_empty:NT\\l_authors_for_head_s{\\msg_warning:nn {PoS}{empty-head-authors}}\n }\n}\n\n\\newcommand{\\printHeadAuthors}{%\n \\seq_use:Nnnn \\l_authors_for_head_s { ~and~} { ,~ } { ~and\\nobreakspace }\n}\n\n% region [Authors/OnBehalf] %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\tl_new:N \\l_onbehalf_tl\n\\skip_const:Nn \\l_onbehalf_skip {0pt plus 2pt minus 2pt}\n\n\\NewDocumentCommand{\\onbehalf}{sm}{\n \\tl_set:Nn \\l_onbehalf_tl {\n \\IfBooleanTF {#1}\n {\n \\skip_vertical:N \\l_onbehalf_skip\n }\n {\n { \\nobreakspace }\n }\n #2\\nobreakspace\n }\n}\n\n% endregion\n\n\n\\ExplSyntaxOff\n\n\n\\renewcommand{\\baselinestretch}{1.1}\\normalsize\n\\setlength\\lineskip{1\\p@}\n\\setlength\\parindent{1.2\\parindent}\n\\setlength\\normallineskip{1\\p@}\n\\setlength\\parskip{0\\p@ \\@plus \\p@}\n\\@lowpenalty 51\n\\@medpenalty 151\n\\@highpenalty 301\n\\widowpenalty 1000\n\\clubpenalty 1000\n\\setcounter{topnumber}{8}\n\\renewcommand\\topfraction{.85} % default .7\n\\setcounter{bottomnumber}{5}\n\\renewcommand\\bottomfraction{.6} %.2\n\\setcounter{totalnumber}{8}\n\\renewcommand\\textfraction{.15}\n\\renewcommand\\floatpagefraction{.8}\n\\setcounter{dbltopnumber}{3}\n\\renewcommand\\dbltopfraction{.85}\n\\renewcommand\\dblfloatpagefraction{.8}\n\\setlength{\\floatsep}{12pt plus 2pt minus 4pt}\n\\setlength{\\textfloatsep}{20pt plus 3pt minus 8pt}\n\\setlength{\\intextsep}{12pt plus 2pt minus 4pt}\n\\textwidth .72\\paperwidth\t% WIDTH OF TEXT, REMAINS .28% FOR MARGINS\n\\setlength\\@tempdima{.76\\paperheight}\t% HEIGHT OF TEXT WITH FOOTNOTES\n\\divide\\@tempdima\\baselineskip\t\t% EXCLUDING HEAD (AND FOOT)\n\\@tempcnta=\\@tempdima\t\t\t% rounded to integer (#lines-1)\n\\setlength\\textheight{\\@tempcnta\\baselineskip}\n\\addtolength\\textheight{\\topskip}\n\\voffset -1in\n\\topmargin .06\\paperheight\t% FROM TOP OF PAGE TO TOP OF HEADING (0=1inch)\n\\headheight .02\\paperheight\t% HEIGHT OF HEADING BOX.\n\\headsep .03\\paperheight\t% VERT. SPACE BETWEEN HEAD AND TEXT.\n\\footskip .04\\paperheight\t% FROM END OF TEX TO BASE OF FOOTER. (40pt)\n\\marginparsep 9\\p@\t\t% HOR. SPACE BETWEEN TEXT AND MARGINAL NOTE\n\\marginparpush 6\\p@\t\t% MIN. VERT. SPACE BETWEEN MARGINAL NOTES\n\\hoffset -1in\t\t\t\t% TO ADJUST WITH PAPER:\n\\oddsidemargin .14\\paperwidth\t% LEFT MARGIN FOR ODD PAGES (20)\n\\evensidemargin .14\\paperwidth\t% LEFT MARGIN FOR EVEN PAGES (20)\n\\marginparwidth .11\\paperwidth\t% TEXTWIDTH OF MARGINALNOTES\n\n\n\n% Header and footer\n\\def\\ps@PoS{%\n \\def\\@oddfoot{%\n \\ifnum\\value{page}=1\n % copyright and link on front page footer\n\t\\PoScopyright@box\\hfill%\n\t\\tiny\\posurl%\n\t\\else%\n % page numbers on all other pages footers\n \\reset@font\\hfil\\thepage\\hfil%\n \\fi}%\n \\def\\@oddhead{%\n \\ifnum\\value{page}=1\n % logo on first page header\n \\smash{\\makebox[0cm][l]{\\logo}}\\hfill%\n \\else%\n % running headers on all other pages\n \\smash{\\vbox{\\hsize=\\textwidth\\noindent\n\t \\ifshorttitle{\\small\\it\\@shorttitle}\\else{\\small\\it\\@title}\\fi\\hfill\n\t \\printHeadAuthors\\vskip.17em \\hrule }}%\n \\fi}%\n \\let\\@mkboth\\@gobbletwo %%%%\n \\let\\sectionmark\\@gobble\n \\let\\subsectionmark\\@gobble\n}\n\n\n% Define all our variables as empty\n\\def\\@subheader{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@abstract{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@xtum{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@accepted{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@received{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@revised{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@published{\\@empty}\n\\def\\doi@url{\\@empty}\n\\def\\doi@anchor{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@dedicated{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@shorttitle{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@afterAbstractEmitNotes{\\@empty}\n\n\\def\\logo{\\raisebox{-5mm}{\\hbox{\\noindent\\includegraphics{PoSlogo.pdf}}}}\n\n% Populate variables\n\\newcommand{\\subheader}[1]{\\gdef\\@subheader{#1}}\n\\renewcommand{\\abstract}[1]{\\gdef\\@abstract{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\notes}[1]{\\gdef\\@afterAbstractEmitNotes{#1}}\n\n\\newcommand\\dedicated[1]{\\gdef\\@dedicated{\\vskip .5\\titlesk@c\n \\vbox{\\small\\it\\raggedleft #1}}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\ShortTitle}[1]{\\gdef\\@shorttitle{#1}\\shorttitletrue}\n\n\\gdef\\FullConference@box{\\relax}\n\\newif\\ifMissingFullConference\\MissingFullConferencetrue\n\\newcommand\\FullConference[1]{\\gdef\\FullConference@box{\n\t\t\t \\vbox{\\small\\raggedright\n\t\t\t \\it #1}}%\n\\MissingFullConferencefalse}\n\n% wrap table of content with two lines\n% also make it just after the title page\n\\let\\oldTableofcontents\\tableofcontents\n\\renewcommand\\tableofcontents{\\dotoctrue}\n\n%comodity (just to have always the same spelling and layout)\n\\newcommand\\acknowledgments{\\section*{Acknowledgments}}\n\\newcommand\\posurl{\\url{https://pos.sissa.it/}}\n\n%% add some footnotetext without the footnotemark\n%% (change the mark and step the counter depending on optional argument)\n\\newcommand\\note[2][?]{%\n \\begin{NoHyper}\n %% with empty optional argument, add a footnote text without any footnotemark\n \\if!#1!%\n \\let\\thefootnote\\relax\\footnotetext{#2}%\n \\else\n %% in any other case, step the footnote counter\n \\stepcounter{footnote}%\n %% if an optional argument was NOT given, add a default footnotetext\n \\if?#1%\n \\footnotetext{#2}%\n \\else%\n %% if an optional argument WAS given, add a footnotetext using the argument as mark\n \\renewcommand{\\thefootnote}{#1}\\footnotetext{#2}%\n \\fi%\n \\fi%\n \\let\\thefootnote\\oldthefootnote%\n \\end{NoHyper}\n}\n\n\n% Copyright\n\\gdef\\PoScopyright@box{\\parbox[b]{.7\\textwidth}{\\tiny $\\copyright$ Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)\nAll rights for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies for commercial purposes, are reserved.\nISSN 1824-8039 . Published by SISSA Medialab.}}\n\n\n% Affiliations\n\\newtoks\\affil@toks\\newif\\ifaffil\\affilfalse\n\\newcommand{\\affiliation}[2][]{%\n\\affiltrue\n \\if!#1!%\n \\affil@toks=\\expandafter{\\the\\affil@toks{\\item[]#2}}%\n \\else\n \\affil@toks=\\expandafter{\\the\\affil@toks{\\item[$^{#1}$]#2}}%\n \\fi\n}\n\n% E-mails\n% (automatically add a comma between emails)\n\\newtoks\\email@toks\\newcounter{email@counter}%\n\\setcounter{email@counter}{0}%\n\\newcommand{\\emailAdd}[1]{%\n\\emailaddtrue%\n\\ifnum\\theemail@counter>0\\email@toks=\\expandafter{\\the\\email@toks, \\@email{#1}}%\n\\else\\email@toks=\\expandafter{\\the\\email@toks\\@email{#1}}%\n\\fi\\stepcounter{email@counter}}\n\\newcommand{\\@email}[1]{\\href{mailto:#1}{#1}}\n\n\n\\renewcommand{\\@dotsep}{10000}\n\n% Hooks after various pieces of the title page\n% (these hooks also define the spacing between the pieces)\n\\newlength{\\affiliationsSep}\\setlength{\\affiliationsSep}{-3pt}\n\\newcommand{\\hookBeforeTitle}{\\vskip2em plus .4fill minus 1em}\n\\newcommand{\\hookAfterTitle}{\\vskip1.7em plus .1fill minus 1em}\n\\newcommand{\\hookAfterRule}{\\vskip1.7em plus .1fill minus 1em}\n\\newcommand{\\hookAfterAuthor}{\\relax}\n\\newcommand{\\hookAfterAffiliation}{\\relax}\n\\newcommand{\\hookAfterEmail}{\\vskip16pt plus0.2fill minus10pt\\filbreak}\n\\newcommand{\\hookAfterAbstract}{\\vskip1.5em plus .05fill minus 1em}\n\\newcommand{\\hookAfterToc}{\\vskip 2em \\@plus 3ex \\@minus 3ex}\n\\newcommand{\\hookAfterTocRule}{\\vskip 2em \\@plus 3ex \\@minus 3ex}\n\n\\newcommand{\\PoSTOCrule}{\\noindent\\rule\\textwidth{.1pt}}\n\n\\renewcommand\\maketitle{\\pagestyle{PoS}%\n \\begingroup%\n \\renewcommand\\thefootnote{\\@fnsymbol\\c@footnote}%\n \\begin{flushleft}%\t\t\t\t% PAY ATTENTION TO \\par'S\n \\null\n %\n \\hookBeforeTitle\n %\n {\\LARGE\\sffamily % TITLE\n \\bfseries\\boldmath\n \\@title\\par}%\n %\n \\hookAfterTitle\n %\n \\hrule height 1\\p@% % RULE 1pt.\n %\n \\hookAfterRule\n %\n {%\n \\raggedright%\n \\renewcommand\\baselinestretch{1.2}%\n \\bfseries%\n \\sffamily%\n \\large%\n \\printAuthors%\n \\par\n }\n %\n \\hookAfterAuthor\n % Affiliations\n \\ifaffil\\begin{list}{}{%\n \\setlength{\\leftmargin}{0.28cm}%\n \\setlength{\\labelsep}{0pt}%\n \\setlength{\\labelwidth}{1em}%\n \\setlength{\\itemsep}{\\affiliationsSep}%\n \\setlength{\\topsep}{-\\parskip}}\n \\itshape\\small%\n \\the\\affil@toks\n \\end{list}\\fi\n %\n \\hookAfterAffiliation\n %\n \\ifemailadd %% if emailadd is true\n \\noindent\\hspace{0.28cm}\\begin{minipage}[l]{.9\\textwidth}\n \\begin{flushleft}\n \\textit{E-mail:} {\\ttfamily\\small\\the\\email@toks}\n \\end{flushleft}\n \\end{minipage}\\fi\n %\n \\hookAfterEmail\n %\n % abstract (narrower)\n \\if!\\@abstract!\\else%\n \\noindent\\hspace{0.28cm}% same indent as affiliations and email (TODO: parametrize indent)\n \\parbox{.9\\textwidth}{\\small\\ignorespaces\\@abstract\\normalsize}%\n \\fi%\n \\@afterAbstractEmitNotes%\n %\n \\@dedicated % DEDICATION (if present) with its space\n %\n \\hookAfterAbstract\n \\vfill\n \\FullConference@box % FULL CONFERENCE INFO\n \\end{flushleft}%\n %\n \\newpage\t\t\t\t% END OF PAGE\n \\endgroup\n \\flushbottom\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}%\n \\ifdotoc%\n \\PoSTOCrule\n \\hookAfterTocRule\n \\oldTableofcontents\n \\hookAfterToc\n \\PoSTOCrule\n \\hookAfterTocRule\n \\fi%\n \\ifMissingFullConference%\n \\PackageWarningNoLine{pos}{No conference info. Please use the macro \\protect\\FullConference}%\n \\fi%\n}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% ACTUAL TITLEPAGE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\n\\setcounter{secnumdepth}{3}\n\n\\newcommand\\secstyle{\\bfseries\\raggedright}\n\n\\renewcommand\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}%\n {3.5ex \\@plus 1.3ex \\@minus .7ex}%\n {2.3ex \\@plus.4ex \\@minus .4ex}%\n {\\normalfont\\large\\secstyle}}\n\\renewcommand\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}%\n {2.3ex\\@plus 1ex \\@minus .5ex}%\n {1.2ex \\@plus .3ex \\@minus .3ex}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\secstyle}}\n\\renewcommand\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}%\n {2.3ex\\@plus 1ex \\@minus .5ex}%\n {1ex \\@plus .2ex \\@minus .2ex}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\secstyle}}\n\\renewcommand\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}%\n {1.75ex \\@plus1ex \\@minus.2ex}%\n {-1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries}}\n\\renewcommand\\subparagraph{\\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\\parindent}%\n {1.75ex \\@plus1ex \\@minus .2ex}%\n {-1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries}}\n\n%% append a dot after the section number\n%% (only for sections, not for sub-sections etc.)\n%% https://texfaq.org/FAQ-seccntfmt\n%% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/24444/56076\n\\newcommand*{\\adddot@section}{.}\n\\renewcommand*{\\@seccntformat}[1]{%\n \\csname the#1\\endcsname\n \\csname adddot@#1\\endcsname\\hspace{1ex}\n}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: skeleton.tex\n================================================\n% Please make sure you insert your\n% data according to the instructions in PoSauthmanual.pdf\n\\documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{article}\n\\usepackage{pos}\n\\usepackage{subcaption}\n\n\\newcommand{\\eps}{\\varepsilon}\n\n\\newcommand{\\Fcomb}{F_{\\mathrm{comb}}}\n\\newcommand{\\Fgeom}{F_{\\mathrm{geom}}}\n\\newcommand{\\Fgen}{F}\n\n\\newcommand{\\Hcomb}{H_{\\mathrm{comb}}}\n\\newcommand{\\Hgeom}{H_{\\mathrm{geom}}}\n\\newcommand{\\Hgen}{H}\n\n\\title{The geometric bookkeeping guide for $\\varepsilon$-factorised differential equations}\n%% \\ShortTitle{Short Title for header}\n\n\\author*[a]{Antonela Matija\\v{s}i\\'{c}}\n\n\n\\affiliation[a]{PRISMA Cluster of Excellence, Institut f{\\\"u}r Physik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universit\\\"at Mainz,\\\\ D-55099 Mainz, Germany, }\n\n\n\\emailAdd{amatijas@uni-mainz.de}\n\n\n\\abstract{Precision predictions for high-energy experiments rely on accurately evaluating multi-loop, multi‑scale Feynman integrals in dimensional regularisation. The method of differential equations is by now the standard tool for this task, but its full power is only realised when the system can be brought into an $\\varepsilon$-factorised form. In this talk, we present an algorithmic framework that systematically constructs $\\varepsilon$-factorised differential equations for arbitrary integral families, independent of their underlying geometry.\n\nWe work in the setting of twisted cohomology and study the space of differential forms associated with a given family of Feynman integrals in the Baikov representation. Our approach consists of two steps. First, we introduce a particular ordering for the Laporta algorithm that orders Feynman integrals within a sector according to their geometric properties. We observe that this order relation yields a basis whose differential equation is in a Laurent polynomial form in the dimensional regulator $\\varepsilon$. In the second step, we systematically construct transformation matrices such that the resulting system is in the $\\varepsilon$‑factorised form. }\n\n\\FullConference{Loops and Legs in Quantum Field Theory (LL2026)\\\\\n12-17, April, 2026\\\\\nBayreuth, Germany\\\\}\n\n%% \\tableofcontents\n\n\\begin{document}\n\\maketitle\n\n\n\\section{Introduction}\n\nIn recent years, progress in high-energy physics has been largely driven by the availability of precision calculations, which depend extensively on perturbative quantum field theory and Feynman integrals. These computations are essential not only for high-energy physics itself, but also play an important role in gravitational wave physics and in high-precision experiments at low energies. One of the main bottlenecks in these computations is efficiently evaluating multi-loop and multi-scale Feynman integrals.\n\nBy now, the standard tool for evaluating Feynman integrals is the method of differential equations~\\cite{Kotikov:1991pm,Remiddi:1997ny,Gehrmann:1999as}. In the first step, a finite basis of master integrals is determined, along with the differential equations they satisfy using integration-by-parts identities~\\cite{Tkachov:1981wb, Chetyrkin:1981qh} and the Laporta algorithm~\\cite{Laporta:2000dsw}. The resulting differential equations can be solved either analytically or numerically~\\cite{Liu:2017jxz,Liu:2022chg,Liu:2022mfb,Hidding:2020ytt,Armadillo:2022ugh,Prisco:2025wqs, PetitRosas:2025xhm}. In analytic computations, one typically first identifies a transformation to an $\\eps$-factorised system of differential equations~\\cite{Henn:2013pwa}, which can then be solved order-by-order in $\\eps$ using iterated integrals~\\cite{Chen:1977oja}.\n\nThere are a few bottlenecks with this approach. First, despite the existence of several optimised public implementations of integration-by-parts reduction~\\cite{Peraro:2019svx,Lee:2013mka,Guan:2024byi,Lange:2025fba,Smirnov:2025prc}, in state-of-the-art applications one can still encounter limitations due to available computing resources. Second challenge comes from finding a transformation to $\\eps$-factorised differential equation especially in presence of non-trivial geometries (see~\\cite{Bree:2025tug,Forner:2026vby} and references therein).\n\nIn~\\cite{e-collaboration:2025frv, Bree:2025tug}, these challenges are addressed by a two-step procedure for finding $\\eps$-factorised differential equations. In the initial step, we use a new ordering relation in the Laporta algorithm which avoids spurious polynomials in the reduction coefficients. We find that this ordering relation leads to a basis whose differential equation is expressed as a Laurent polynomial in $\\varepsilon$. Furthermore, this differential equation can be systematically transformed into an $\\varepsilon$‑factorised form without using the knowledge of the underlying geometry.\n\nIn this talk, we review the main steps of the proposed algorithm and demonstrate its application on an example relevant for low-energy physics precision computations.\n\n\\section{Setup and algorithm overview}\nWe are interested in a family of Feynman integrals and we assume that any scalar product involving loop momenta can be written as a linear combination of inverse propagators and a constant term, i.e. we introduce irreducible scalar products (ISPs) if needed. \n\nWe would like to improve the ordering within a given sector, therefore we can work on the maximal cut. It is convenient to analyse the maximal cut of a Feynman integral in Baikov representation~\\cite{Baikov:1996iu}. In particular, we are using a loop-by-loop Baikov representation~\\cite{Frellesvig:2017aai} \n\\begin{equation}\n I_{\\nu_1,\\ldots,\\nu_{N_E}}\\left(D_{int},\\varepsilon,x\\right) = C_{B} \\int \\prod_{i\\in I_{all}}[p_i(z,x)]^{\\alpha_i} \\prod_{j=1}^{N_E} \\dfrac{d z_j}{z_j^{\\nu_j}},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $z_j$ are Baikov variables, and $C_B$ depends on kinematic variables $x$ and dimensional regulator $\\eps$. Exponents $\\alpha_i$ are always of the following form\n\\begin{equation}\n \\alpha_i=\\frac{1}{2}\\left(a_i + b_i \\varepsilon \\right), \\quad a_i,\\;b_i \\in \\mathbb{Z}.\n\\end{equation}\nWe say that polynomial $p_i$ is even if the corresponding $a_i$ is even. Similarly, if $a_i$ is odd, we call the corresponding polynomial $p_i$ odd.\n\nOn the maximal cut, we have\n\\begin{equation}\n C_{B} \\int_{\\mathcal{C}_{\\text{maxcut}}} \\dfrac{d^n z}{(2\\pi i)^n} \\prod_{i\\in I_{all}}[p_i(z,x)]^{\\alpha_i},\n\\end{equation} \nwhere $z$ are now remaining $n$ Baikov variables. We extend the affine space with coordinates $(z_1,\\ldots,z_n)$ to projective space with homogeneous coordinates $[z_0:z_1:\\ldots:z_n]$. Furthermore, we define differential forms as\n\\begin{equation}\n \\label{eq:diff_forms}\n \\Psi_{\\mu_0,\\ldots, \\mu_{N_D}}[Q]=C\\;U\\; \\dfrac{Q}{\\prod_{i\\in I_{all}^0} P_i^{\\mu_i}} \\eta, \\quad \\mu_i \\in \\mathbb{N}_0.\n\\end{equation}\nHere, $C$ is $z$-independent prefactor (see Ref.~\\cite{e-collaboration:2025frv, Bree:2025tug} for definition), $U$ is a twist function\n\\begin{equation}\n U=\\prod_{i\\in I_{odd}}[P_i(z,x)]^{-\\frac{1}{2}+\\frac{1}{2} b_i \\varepsilon}\\prod_{i\\in I_{even}}[P_i(z,x)]^{\\frac{1}{2} b_i \\varepsilon},\n\\end{equation}\n$Q$ is a homogeneous polynomial in Baikov variables, and $\\eta$ is the standard differential $n$-form.\n\nThese differential forms satisfy three types of linear relations:\n\\begin{enumerate}\n \\item Integration-by-parts identities\n \\begin{equation}\n \\frac{1}{\\varepsilon}\\Psi_{\\mu_0\\ldots\\mu_i\\ldots\\mu_{N_D}}\\left[\\partial_{z_j}Q_{+}\\right] + \\sum_{i\\in I_{all}} \\Psi_{\\mu_0\\ldots(\\mu_i+1)\\ldots\\mu_{N_D}}\\left[Q_{+}\\left(\\partial_{z_j} P_i \\right)\\right] =0\n \\end{equation}\n \\item Distribution identities\n \\begin{equation}\n \\Psi_{\\mu_0\\ldots\\mu_{N_D}}\\left[Q_1 + Q_2\\right] = \\Psi_{\\mu_0\\ldots\\mu_{N_D}}\\left[Q_1 \\right]+\\Psi_{\\mu_0\\ldots\\mu_{N_D}}\\left[Q_2\\right]\n \\end{equation}\n \\item Cancellation identities\n \\begin{equation}\n \\Psi_{\\mu_0\\ldots(\\mu_j+1)\\ldots \\mu_{N_D}}\\left[P_j Q\\right] = \\frac{1}{\\varepsilon} \\left(\\frac{a_j}{2}-\\mu_j+\\frac{b_j}{2}\\varepsilon\\right)\\Psi_{\\mu_0\\ldots\\mu_j\\ldots \\mu_{N_D}}\\left[Q\\right].\n \\label{eq:ci}\n \\end{equation}\n\\end{enumerate}\nAfter modding out these linear relations, differential forms span a finite-dimensional vector space $H^n_{\\omega}$ (twisted cohomology group).\n\nWe would like to minimise the division with the linear factors in $\\eps$ on the right hand side of the cancellation identities~\\eqref{eq:ci}. Therefore, within a given sector, we propose a new ordering criteria\n\\begin{equation}\n \\label{eq:new ordering}\n \\left(a,w,o,|\\mu|,\\ldots \\right).\n\\end{equation}\nFirst we order the differential forms by the localization level $a$. If even polynomials appear in the denominator of a differential form, we may take a residue around $P_i=0, \\; i \\in I_{even}^0$. We then say that we localise at this specific $P_i$, which yields a simpler problem. This procedure should be iterated until we get to a point. By assigning $a=-w$ to preferred candidates that are masters on a localization and $a=0$ to all other forms,\n%\\begin{align}\n% a = \\left\\{\n% \\begin{array}{rl}\n% -w, & \\Psi_{\\mu_0 \\dots \\mu_{N_D}}[Q] \\; \\mbox{is a preferred candidate on a localisation}\\\\\n% 0, & \\mbox{otherwise,} \\\\\n% \\end{array}\n% \\right.\n%\\end{align}\nwe want to give preference to differential forms coming from these simpler problems. The next integer we assign to a differential forms is the Hodge weight $w=n+r$, where $r$ is the number of consecutive non-zero residues that we can take. Within a given weight, we organise differential forms by pole order $o$. Both $w$ and $o$ are computed after setting $\\eps = 0$ in $U$. Finally, the last integer we assign is $|\\mu|=\\sum_{i \\in I_{all}} \\mu_i$.\n\nIn addition to being used in the ordering relation, integers $(r,o,|\\mu|)$ define three filtrations $W_{\\bullet}, \\; F_{geom}^{\\bullet},\\; F_{comb}^{\\bullet}$, respectively, on the space of differential forms. These filtrations can be used to decompose the vector space of differential forms into subspaces.\n\nUsing the ordering criteria~\\eqref{eq:new ordering} in the Laporta algorithm we obtain a basis $J$.\nWe observe that the coefficients in the reduction of the derivatives of master integrals $J$ are Laurent polynomials in $\\eps$, i.e. we get a differential equation of the following form\n\\begin{equation}\n \\text{d} J = \\sum_{k=k_{min}}^1 \\varepsilon^k A^{(k)}(x) J.\n\\end{equation}\nIn addition, if $\\Psi_i$ has $|\\mu|=|\\mu|_i$ and $\\Psi_j$ has $|\\mu|=|\\mu|_j$, we observe that \n\\begin{equation}\n A_{i,j}(\\eps,x)=\\sum_{k_{min}=-|\\mu|_i-|\\mu|_j} \\eps^k A_{i,j}^{(k)}(x),\n\\end{equation}\nand we call such a differential equation $F^{\\bullet}$-compatible differential equation with respect to $F_{comb}^{\\bullet}$ filtration.\n\nIn Ref.~\\cite{Bree:2025tug}, we prove that $F^{\\bullet}$-compatible differential equation can always be systematically transformed to an $\\eps$-factorised differential equation. \n\n\\section{Illustrative example: a kite diagram}\nLet us take a look at a particular example and go through the main steps of the algorithm.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t!]\n \\begin{subfigure}{0.5\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.6\\linewidth]{PL3.png}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\begin{subfigure}{0.5\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\linewidth]{filtration.pdf}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\caption{A kite diagram. Blue lines represent propagators and external momenta with the mass $m^2$, while the orange line represent the external momenta with the mass $q^2$. Thinner black lines are massless. The top sector has seven master integrals that decompose with respect to $\\Fgeom^{\\bullet}$ and $W_{\\bullet}$ filtration as shown on the right figure.} \n \\label{fig:pl3}\n\\end{figure}\n\nWe are considering a kite diagram (see Fig.~\\ref{fig:pl3}) with the following kinematics:\n\\begin{align}\n p_1^2&=p_2^2=m^2, \\qquad p_3^2=0, \\qquad p_4^2=q^2 \\notag \\\\\n s&=(p_1+p_2)^2, \\quad t=(p_2+p_3)^2,\\quad u=(p_1+p_3)^2\n\\end{align}\nThe inverse propagators of the full family are defined as:\n\\begin{align}\n \\sigma_1&=(k1_p1)^2, \\quad \\sigma_2=k_1^2-m^2, \\quad \\sigma_3=(k_1+p_2)^2, \\quad \\sigma_4=(k_2-p_1)^2-m^2 \\notag \\\\\n \\sigma_5&=(k_2+p_2) - m^2, \\quad\n \\sigma_6=(k_2+p_2+p_3)^2-m^2, \\quad \\sigma_7=(k_1-k_2)^2-m^2, \\notag \\\\\n \\sigma_8&=(k_1+p_2+p_3)^2, \\quad \\sigma_9=k_2^2.\n\\end{align}\nWe are interested in the kite sector whose inverse propagators are $\\{\\sigma_2, \\sigma_3, \\sigma_4,\\sigma_6, \\sigma_7 \\}$, and we use two ISPs ($z_1=\\sigma_5$ and $z_2=\\sigma_9$) in order to compute a loop-by-loop Baikov representation. On the maximal cut we get:\n\\begin{equation}\n e^{2 \\eps \\gamma_E} \\int_{\\mathcal{C}_{\\text{maxcut}}}\\dfrac{d^Dk_1}{i \\pi^{2-\\eps}}\\dfrac{d^Dk_2}{i \\pi^{2-\\eps}} \\dfrac{1}{\\sigma_2\\sigma_3\\sigma_4\\sigma_6\\sigma_7}=C_B \\int \\dfrac{dz_1}{2\\pi i}\\dfrac{dz_2}{2\\pi i} p_1^{-2 \\eps } {p_2}^{-\\frac{1}{2} +\\eps} {p_3}^{ -\\frac{1}{2} -\\eps},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere \n\\begin{align}\n \\label{eq:poly3}\n C_B &= -\\dfrac{(-1)^{-\\eps} 16 e^{2 \\eps \\gamma_E} \\pi^3}{\\Gamma\\left(1-2\\eps \\right)} \\left(m^2 \\right)^{-\\eps} \\left(-m^4 s+m^2 \\left(-q^4+q^2 s+2 s t\\right)-s t \\left(-q^2+s+t\\right)\\right)^{\\eps}, \\notag \\\\\n p_1&=z_1, \\notag \\\\\n p_2&= \\left(4 m^2 z_1-\\left(z_1-z_2\\right){}^2\\right), \\\\\n p_3&= z_1^2 \\left(m^4-2 m^2 \\left(q^2+t\\right)+\\left(q^2-t\\right)^2\\right) + z_2^2\\left(q^2-s\\right)^2 \\notag\\\\\n & -2 z_1 z_2 \\left(m^2 \\left(q^2+s\\right)+q^4-q^2 (s+t)-s t\\right) + 2 z_1 \\left(m^2-t\\right) \\left(m^2 \\left(2 q^2+s\\right)+s \\left(t-q^2\\right)\\right) \\notag \\\\\n & -2 z_2 \\left(q^2-s\\right) \\left(m^2 \\left(2 q^2-s\\right)-s t\\right) -s(4 m^2 - s) (m^2 - t)^2. \\notag\n\\end{align}\nThe homogenous twist is \n\\begin{equation}\n U= z_0^{2 \\eps}P_1^{-2 \\eps } {P_2}^{-\\frac{1}{2}+\\eps} {P_3}^{-\\frac{1}{2}-\\eps},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere polynomials $P_1,\\; P_2,\\; P_3$ are homogenous versions of polynomials in equation~\\eqref{eq:poly3}. The twist is of the degree $-2$. Therefore, differential forms have to be of a degree $-1$. There are seven master integrals in this sector. \n\nPolynomials $P_0$ and $P_1$ are even, hence we start the analysis by localising on them. Let us first look at the $P_0=0$ localisation. We may take two consecutive non-zero residue at points\n\\begin{equation}\n \\left[ 0:0:1 \\right], \\quad \\left[ 0:1:1 \\right].\n\\end{equation}\nThe differential form $\\Psi_{1100}[z_2]$ has residue at both points, while $\\Psi_{1000}[1]$ has a residue only at the second point. We assign to these forms $a=-4$. Running the algorithm at weight 3 tells us that these two forms are independent and that the basis for $\\langle P_0 \\rangle$ localisation is \n\\begin{equation}\n \\{\\Psi_{1000}[1],\\; \\Psi_{1100}[z_2] \\}.\n\\end{equation}\nBoth of these forms have $w=4$ and $o=2$. \n\nWe proceed with the localisation on the remaining even polynomial $ P_1=0$. The form $\\Psi_{1100}[z_2]$ has two residues at the point \n\\begin{equation}\n \\left[ 0:1:1 \\right],\n\\end{equation}\nand we assign $a=-4$ to it. In addition, this form has $w=4$ and $o=2$. We then run the reduction at weight 3 and find the remaining 2 candidates\n\\begin{equation}\n \\{\\Psi_{0100}[1],\\; \\Psi_{0110}\\left[ 2 m^2 (-m^2 + t) z_0 + (m^2 + t) z_1 + (m^2 - t) z_2\\right] \\}.\n\\end{equation}\nBoth of these forms have $w=3$, while the first has $o=1$ and the second one has $o=2$. We assign $a=-3$ to these forms before merging the results of the two localisations (see Ref.~\\cite{Bree:2025tug} for details on the merge procedure). \n\nAfter the merge procedure, we are left with four independent master integrands\n\\begin{equation}\n \\lbrace \\Psi_{1000}[1],\\; \\Psi_{0100}[1],\\; \\Psi_{1100}[z_2] ,\\; \\Psi_{0110}\\left[2 m^2 (-m^2 + t) z_0 + (m^2 + t) z_1 + (m^2 - t) z_2\\right] \\rbrace. \n\\end{equation}\nRunning the Laporta algorithm on the full system, we find the remaining 3 master integrands\n\\begin{equation}\n \\lbrace \\Psi_{0001}[\\mathcal{N}_1],\\; \\Psi_{0001}[\\mathcal{N}_2],\\; \\Psi_{0010}[\\mathcal{N}_3]\\rbrace, \n\\end{equation}\nwhere\n\\begin{align}\n \\mathcal{N}_1&= -(m^2 - t) (2 m^2 q^2 - m^2 s - s t) z_0 + \\bigl[-m^4 + (q^2 - 2 s - t) t + \n m^2 (q^2 + 2 t) \\bigr] z_1 + (q^2 - s) (m^2 - t) z_2 \\notag \\\\\n \\mathcal{N}_2 &=- (4 m^2 - s) s (m^2 - t) z_0 + \\bigl[m^2 (2 q^2 + s) + s (-q^2 + t)\\bigr] z_1 + \n s (2 m^2 + q^2 - s - 2 t) z_2, \\notag \\\\\n \\mathcal{N}_3&=2 m^2 (m^2 - t) z_0 + (2 m^2 - s - 2 t) z_1 - s z_2.\n\\end{align}\nThese 3 master integrands have $w=2$ and $o=1$. \n\nThe full basis of master integrands ordered by $|\\mu|$ is \n\\begin{align}\n &\\left \\lbrace \\Psi_{0001}[\\mathcal{N}_1], \\; \\Psi_{0001}[\\mathcal{N}_2], \\; \\Psi_{0010}[\\mathcal{N}_3] ,\\; \\Psi_{1000}[1], \\; \\Psi_{0100}[1], \\right. \\\\\n &\\left. \\; \\Psi_{011}\\left[2 m^2 (-m^2 + t) z_0 + (m^2 + t) z_1 + (m^2 - t) z_2\\right] , \\; \\Psi_{1100}[z_2] \\right \\rbrace,\n\\end{align}\nwhich corresponds to the basis\n\\begin{align}\n &\\left\\lbrace \\frac{1}{2} \\eps^2 I_{011201100}, \\; \\frac{1}{2} \\eps^2 I_{011102100}, \\right. \\notag \\\\\n &\\left.\\frac{1}{2} \\eps^2 \\left[I_{(-1)21101100} - I_{0211011(-1)0} +\\eps \\dfrac{m^2-t- s}{m^2} I_{011101100} - s I_{021101100}\\right], \\right. \\notag \\\\\n &\\left.-\\eps^2 I_{011101200},\\; 2 \\eps^3 I_{011101100}, \n - 2 \\varepsilon^2 \\left(\n 2 m^2 I_{021101100} +2 \\varepsilon I_{011101100} + 2 m^2 I_{011101200}\n \\right), \\right. \\notag \\\\\n &\\left. \\eps I_{0111013(-1)0} \\right\\rbrace \n\\end{align}\non the Feynman integral side.\n\n\nThe resulting differential equation is in the $F^{\\bullet}$-compatible form with the following $\\eps$-dependence of the connection matrices:\n\\begin{equation}\n \\left(\n\\begin{array}{ccccc|cc}\n \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} \\\\\n \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} \\\\\n \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} \\\\\n \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} \\\\\n \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{1\\} & - \\\\\n \\hline\n \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} \\\\\n \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{-1,0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} \\\\\n\\end{array}\n\\right).\n\\end{equation}\nHere $\\{-1,0,1\\}$ means that the coefficients of $\\eps^{-1},\\; \\eps^0$ and $\\eps^1$ are non-vanishing rational functions of kinematic variables.\n\nGenerally, the entries of connection matrices are at most be rational functions of $\\eps$ when using one of the standard orderings in the Laporta algorithm. In this example, using one of the standard orderings in the Laporta algorithm, gives us a basis\n\\begin{align}\n \\left\\{ I_{011101100},\\; I_{021101100},\\; \n I_{012101100},\\; I_{011201100},\\; \n I_{011102100},\\; I_{011101200}, \\;\n I_{031101100} \\right\\},\n\\end{align}\nwhose differential equations have connection matrices with $\\eps$-dependence as\n\\begin{equation}\n \\left(\n\\begin{array}{ccccccc}\n \\{0,1\\} & \\{-1,0\\} & \\{-1,0\\} & \\{0\\} & \\{0\\} & \\{-1,0\\} & \\{-1\\} \\\\\n \\{2\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0\\} \\\\\n \\{2\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0\\} \\\\\n \\{2\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0\\} \\\\\n \\{2\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0\\} \\\\\n \\{2\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{1\\} & \\{0,1\\} & \\{0\\} \\\\\n \\{2,3\\} & \\{0,1,2\\} & \\{0,1,2\\} & \\{1,2\\} & \\{1,2\\} & \\{0,1,2\\} & \\{0,1\\} \\\\\n\\end{array}\n\\right).\n\\end{equation}\nEven though, we only get monomials in $\\eps$ when using one of the standard orderings, we still benefit from the improved ordering. The first benefit is that the size of the differential equations is roughly a half of the standard one. The second benefit is that we can systematically remove unwanted terms in $\\eps$ until we reach an $\\eps$-factorised form. \n\n\n\n\n\\section{Conclusions}\nIn this talk, we reviewed a recently proposed two-step algorithm for finding $\\eps$-factorised differential equations for Feynman integrals. In the first step, we use a new ordering relation in the Laporta algorithm inspired by geometry. We observe that the resulting basis satisfies differential equations compatible with a filtration. This step involves only rational functions in kinematic variables which benefits semi-numerical approaches~\\cite{Hidding:2020ytt,Armadillo:2022ugh,Prisco:2025wqs, PetitRosas:2025xhm}. Additionally, we observe a reduction in size of differential equations since our approach avoids spurious polynomials in the denominators. In the second step, we may systematically remove unwanted terms in $\\eps$ starting from a differential equation compatible with a filtration. \n\n\n\n\\begin{thebibliography}{99}\n\n%\\cite{e-collaboration:2025frv}\n\\bibitem{e-collaboration:2025frv}\nI.~Bree \\textit{et al.} [{\\ensuremath{\\varepsilon}}-collaboration],\n%``Geometric Bookkeeping Guide to Feynman Integral Reduction and {\\ensuremath{\\epsilon}}-Factorized Differential Equations,''\nPhys. Rev. Lett. \\textbf{136}, no.24, 241602 (2026)\n%doi:10.1103/pyt8-d7rt\n[arXiv:2506.09124 [hep-th]].\n%24 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 24 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Bree:2025tug}\n\\bibitem{Bree:2025tug}\nI.~Bree \\textit{et al.} [{\\ensuremath{\\epsilon}}-collaboration],\n%``New algorithms for Feynman integral reduction and epsilon-factorized differential equations,''\nPhys. Rev. D \\textbf{113}, no.11, 116019 (2026)\n%doi:10.1103/mjpn-61yv\n[arXiv:2511.15381 [hep-th]].\n%15 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 24 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Kotikov:1991pm}\n\\bibitem{Kotikov:1991pm}\nA.~V.~Kotikov,\n%``Differential equation method: The Calculation of N point Feynman diagrams,''\nPhys. Lett. B \\textbf{267}, 123-127 (1991)\n[erratum: Phys. Lett. B \\textbf{295}, 409-409 (1992)]\n%doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90536-Y\n%534 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Remiddi:1997ny}\n\\bibitem{Remiddi:1997ny}\nE.~Remiddi,\n%``Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes,''\nNuovo Cim. A \\textbf{110}, 1435-1452 (1997)\n%doi:10.1007/BF03185566\n[arXiv:hep-th/9711188 [hep-th]].\n%848 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Gehrmann:1999as}\n\\bibitem{Gehrmann:1999as}\nT.~Gehrmann and E.~Remiddi,\n%``Differential equations for two-loop four-point functions,''\nNucl. Phys. B \\textbf{580}, 485-518 (2000)\n%doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00223-6\n[arXiv:hep-ph/9912329 [hep-ph]].\n%1141 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Tkachov:1981wb}\n\\bibitem{Tkachov:1981wb}\nF.~V.~Tkachov,\n%``A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,''\nPhys. Lett. B \\textbf{100}, 65-68 (1981)\n%doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90288-4\n%1478 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Chetyrkin:1981qh}\n\\bibitem{Chetyrkin:1981qh}\nK.~G.~Chetyrkin and F.~V.~Tkachov,\n%``Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate $\\beta$-functions in 4 loops,''\nNucl. Phys. B \\textbf{192}, 159-204 (1981)\n%doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90199-1\n%2450 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Laporta:2000dsw}\n\\bibitem{Laporta:2000dsw}\nS.~Laporta,\n%``High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,''\nInt. J. Mod. Phys. A \\textbf{15}, 5087-5159 (2000)\n%doi:10.1142/S0217751X00002159\n[arXiv:hep-ph/0102033 [hep-ph]].\n%1520 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 29 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Liu:2017jxz}\n\\bibitem{Liu:2017jxz}\nX.~Liu, Y.~Q.~Ma and C.~Y.~Wang,\n%``A Systematic and Efficient Method to Compute Multi-loop Master Integrals,''\nPhys. Lett. B \\textbf{779}, 353-357 (2018)\n%doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.02.026\n[arXiv:1711.09572 [hep-ph]].\n%266 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Liu:2022chg}\n\\bibitem{Liu:2022chg}\nX.~Liu and Y.~Q.~Ma,\n%``AMFlow: A Mathematica package for Feynman integrals computation via auxiliary mass flow,''\nComput. Phys. Commun. \\textbf{283}, 108565 (2023)\n%doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108565\n[arXiv:2201.11669 [hep-ph]].\n%361 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Liu:2022mfb}\n\\bibitem{Liu:2022mfb}\nZ.~F.~Liu and Y.~Q.~Ma,\n%``Determining Feynman Integrals with Only Input from Linear Algebra,''\nPhys. Rev. Lett. \\textbf{129}, no.22, 222001 (2022)\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.222001\n[arXiv:2201.11637 [hep-ph]].\n%101 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Hidding:2020ytt}\n\\bibitem{Hidding:2020ytt}\nM.~Hidding,\n%``DiffExp, a Mathematica package for computing Feynman integrals in terms of one-dimensional series expansions,''\nComput. Phys. Commun. \\textbf{269}, 108125 (2021)\n%doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108125\n[arXiv:2006.05510 [hep-ph]].\n%219 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Armadillo:2022ugh}\n\\bibitem{Armadillo:2022ugh}\nT.~Armadillo, R.~Bonciani, S.~Devoto, N.~Rana and A.~Vicini,\n%``Evaluation of Feynman integrals with arbitrary complex masses via series expansions,''\nComput. Phys. Commun. \\textbf{282}, 108545 (2023)\n%doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108545\n[arXiv:2205.03345 [hep-ph]].\n%104 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Prisco:2025wqs}\n\\bibitem{Prisco:2025wqs}\nR.~M.~Prisco, J.~Ronca and F.~Tramontano,\n%``LINE: Loop Integrals Numerical Evaluation,''\nJHEP \\textbf{07}, 219 (2025)\n%doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2025)219\n[arXiv:2501.01943 [hep-ph]].\n%30 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{PetitRosas:2025xhm}\n\\bibitem{PetitRosas:2025xhm}\nP.~Petit Ros{\\`a}s and W.~J.~Torres Bobadilla,\n%``Fast evaluation of Feynman integrals for Monte Carlo generators,''\nJHEP \\textbf{09}, 210 (2025)\n%doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2025)210\n[arXiv:2507.12548 [hep-ph]].\n%13 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Henn:2013pwa}\n\\bibitem{Henn:2013pwa}\nJ.~M.~Henn,\n%``Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,''\nPhys. Rev. Lett. \\textbf{110}, 251601 (2013)\n%doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.251601\n[arXiv:1304.1806 [hep-th]].\n%1189 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Chen:1977oja}\n\\bibitem{Chen:1977oja}\nK.~T.~Chen,\n%``Iterated path integrals,''\nBull. Am. Math. Soc. \\textbf{83}, 831-879 (1977)\n%doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1977-14320-6\n%435 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Peraro:2019svx}\n\\bibitem{Peraro:2019svx}\nT.~Peraro,\n%``$\\text{FiniteFlow}$: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs,''\nJHEP \\textbf{07}, 031 (2019)\n%doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2019)031\n[arXiv:1905.08019 [hep-ph]].\n%338 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Lee:2013mka}\n\\bibitem{Lee:2013mka}\nR.~N.~Lee,\n%``LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for reduction of multiloop integrals,''\nJ. Phys. Conf. Ser. \\textbf{523}, 012059 (2014)\n%doi:10.1088/1742-6596/523/1/012059\n[arXiv:1310.1145 [hep-ph]].\n%725 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Guan:2024byi}\n\\bibitem{Guan:2024byi}\nX.~Guan, X.~Liu, Y.~Q.~Ma and W.~H.~Wu,\n%``Blade: A package for block-triangular form improved Feynman integrals decomposition,''\nComput. Phys. Commun. \\textbf{310}, 109538 (2025)\n%doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2025.109538\n[arXiv:2405.14621 [hep-ph]].\n%94 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Lange:2025fba}\n\\bibitem{Lange:2025fba}\nF.~Lange, J.~Usovitsch and Z.~Wu,\n%``Kira 3: integral reduction with efficient seeding and optimized equation selection,''\nComput. Phys. Commun. \\textbf{322}, 109999 (2026)\n%doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2025.109999\n[arXiv:2505.20197 [hep-ph]].\n%79 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Smirnov:2025prc}\n\\bibitem{Smirnov:2025prc}\nA.~V.~Smirnov and M.~Zeng,\n%``FIRE 7: Automatic Reduction with Modular Approach,''\n[arXiv:2510.07150 [hep-ph]].\n%27 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Forner:2026vby}\n\\bibitem{Forner:2026vby}\nF.~Forner, C.~C.~Mella, C.~Nega, L.~Tancredi and F.~J.~Wagner,\n%``Integrand Analysis, Leading Singularities and Canonical Bases beyond Polylogarithms,''\n[arXiv:2604.25270 [hep-th]].\n%3 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 30 Jun 2026\n\n\n%\\cite{Baikov:1996iu}\n\\bibitem{Baikov:1996iu}\nP.~A.~Baikov,\n%``Explicit solutions of the multiloop integral recurrence relations and its application,''\nNucl. Instrum. Meth. A \\textbf{389}, 347-349 (1997)\n%doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(97)00126-5\n[arXiv:hep-ph/9611449 [hep-ph]].\n%248 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 29 Jun 2026\n\n%\\cite{Frellesvig:2017aai}\n\\bibitem{Frellesvig:2017aai}\nH.~Frellesvig and C.~G.~Papadopoulos,\n%``Cuts of Feynman Integrals in Baikov representation,''\nJHEP \\textbf{04}, 083 (2017)\n%doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2017)083\n[arXiv:1701.07356 [hep-ph]].\n%194 citations counted in INSPIRE as of 29 Jun 2026\n\n\n\n\\end{thebibliography}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091195,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31995"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31995"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Alexandre Boucaud"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Alexandre Boucaud, Pierre Antilogus, \\'Eric Aubourg, Antoine Bernard, Johan Bregeon, Patrick Breugnon, Julien Cordian, Herv\\'e Croizet, Guillaume Daubard, Kevin Fanning, Fabrice Gallo, Anthony S. Johnson, Claire Juramy-Gilles, Pierre Karst, Mile Kusulja, Eric Lagorio, Travis Lange, Didier Laporte, Juan-Carlos Lazarte, Margaux Lopez, Aur\\'elien Marini, Stuart Marshall, Dmitry Onoprienko, Hannah M. M. Pollek, Max Turri, Yousuke Utsumi, Francis Vezzu, Fran\\c{c}oise Virieux, T\\'eo Weicherding"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"The filter exchange system of the LSSTCam at the Vera C. Rubin Observatory"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"14 pages, 5 figures, proceeding of the SPIE conference"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"astro-ph.IM"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"The Filter Exchange System of the LSSTCam at the Vera C. Rubin Observatory is a critical subsystem enabling the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) by performing rapid, repeatable exchanges among five large-format filters within a highly constrained in-camera volume. Since the start of on-sky operations in April 2025, the FES has routinely performed up to 40 filter exchanges per night, completing each change in under 90 seconds with a positioning repeatability of 100 micrometers in the focal plane. Safety and reliability are ensured through a dedicated software architecture. Drawing on over a year of operational experience, we report on the in-situ performance of this sophisticated system within the observatory environment, characterize the key performance metrics, and discuss how specific design choices have influenced system behavior and reliability in practice."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:31:02 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:31:02 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Boucaud","Alexandre",""],["Antilogus","Pierre",""],["Aubourg","Éric",""],["Bernard","Antoine",""],["Bregeon","Johan",""],["Breugnon","Patrick",""],["Cordian","Julien",""],["Croizet","Hervé",""],["Daubard","Guillaume",""],["Fanning","Kevin",""],["Gallo","Fabrice",""],["Johnson","Anthony S.",""],["Juramy-Gilles","Claire",""],["Karst","Pierre",""],["Kusulja","Mile",""],["Lagorio","Eric",""],["Lange","Travis",""],["Laporte","Didier",""],["Lazarte","Juan-Carlos",""],["Lopez","Margaux",""],["Marini","Aurélien",""],["Marshall","Stuart",""],["Onoprienko","Dmitry",""],["Pollek","Hannah M. M.",""],["Turri","Max",""],["Utsumi","Yousuke",""],["Vezzu","Francis",""],["Virieux","Françoise",""],["Weicherding","Téo",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Boucaud\",\n \"Alexandre\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Antilogus\",\n \"Pierre\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Aubourg\",\n \"Éric\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Bernard\",\n \"Antoine\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Bregeon\",\n \"Johan\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Breugnon\",\n \"Patrick\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Cordian\",\n \"Julien\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Croizet\",\n \"Hervé\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Daubard\",\n \"Guillaume\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Fanning\",\n \"Kevin\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Gallo\",\n \"Fabrice\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Johnson\",\n \"Anthony S.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Juramy-Gilles\",\n \"Claire\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Karst\",\n \"Pierre\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Kusulja\",\n \"Mile\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Lagorio\",\n \"Eric\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Lange\",\n \"Travis\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Laporte\",\n \"Didier\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Lazarte\",\n \"Juan-Carlos\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Lopez\",\n \"Margaux\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Marini\",\n \"Aurélien\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Marshall\",\n \"Stuart\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Onoprienko\",\n \"Dmitry\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Pollek\",\n \"Hannah M. M.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Turri\",\n \"Max\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Utsumi\",\n \"Yousuke\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Vezzu\",\n \"Francis\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Virieux\",\n \"Françoise\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Weicherding\",\n \"Téo\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: main.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[]{spie} %>>> use for US letter paper\n% \\documentclass[a4paper]{spie} %>>> use this instead for A4 paper\n%\\documentclass[nocompress]{spie} %>>> to avoid compression of citations\n\n\\renewcommand{\\baselinestretch}{1.0} % Change to 1.65 for double spacing\n \n\\usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,amssymb}\n\\usepackage{siunitx}\n\\sisetup{range-phrase = {\\textendash}, range-units = single}\n\\DeclareSIUnit{\\gee}{\\textit{g}}\n\\DeclareSIUnit{\\bps}{bps}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{subcaption}\n\\usepackage[colorlinks=true, allcolors=blue]{hyperref}\n\n\\title{The filter exchange system of the LSSTCam at \\newline the Vera C. Rubin Observatory}\n\n\\author[a]{Alexandre~Boucaud}\n\\author[b]{Pierre~Antilogus}\n\\author[c]{\\'{E}ric~Aubourg}\n\\author[d]{Antoine~Bernard}\n\\author[d]{Johan~Bregeon}\n\\author[e]{Patrick~Breugnon}\n\\author[b]{Julien~Cordian}\n\\author[f]{Hervé~Croizet}\n\\author[b]{Guillaume~Daubard}\n\\author[g]{Kevin~Fanning}\n\\author[e]{Fabrice~Gallo}\n\\author[g]{Anthony~S.~Johnson}\n\\author[b]{Claire~Juramy-Gilles}\n\\author[e]{Pierre~Karst}\n\\author[d]{Mile~Kusulja}\n\\author[d]{Eric~Lagorio}\n\\author[g]{Travis~Lange}\n\\author[b]{Didier~Laporte}\n\\author[g]{Juan-Carlos~Lazarte}\n\\author[g]{Margaux~Lopez}\n\\author[e]{Aur\\'{e}lien~Marini}\n\\author[g]{Stuart~Marshall}\n\\author[g]{Dmitry~Onoprienko}\n\\author[g]{Hannah~M.~M.~Pollek}\n\\author[f]{Max~Turri}\n\\author[h]{Yousuke~Utsumi}\n\\author[d]{Francis~Vezzu}\n\\author[a]{Françoise Virieux}\n\\author[e]{T\\'{e}o~Weicherding}\n\n\\affil[a]{Universit\\'e Paris Cit\\'e, CNRS/IN2P3, APC, 4 rue Elsa Morante, F-75013 Paris, France}\n\\affil[b]{Sorbonne Universit\\'{e}, Universit\\'{e} Paris Cit\\'{e}, CNRS/IN2P3, LPNHE, 4 place Jussieu, F-75005 Paris, France}\n\\affil[c]{Universit\\'{e} Paris Cit\\'{e}, CEA, CNRS/IN2P3, APC, 4 rue Elsa Morante, F-75013 Paris, France}\n\\affil[d]{Universit\\'{e} Grenoble Alpes, CNRS/IN2P3, LPSC, 53 avenue des Martyrs, F-38026 Grenoble, France}\n\\affil[e]{Aix Marseille Universit\\'{e}, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, 163 avenue de Luminy, F-13288 Marseille, France}\n\\affil[f]{Universit\\'{e} Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, LPCA, 4 Avenue Blaise Pascal, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France}\n\\affil[g]{SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Rd., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA}\n\\affil[h]{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Chile Observatory, Los Abedules 3085, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile}\n\n% Could be Pierre + Alex\n\\authorinfo{Corresponding author e-mail: aboucaud@apc.in2p3.fr}\n\n% Option to view page numbers\n\\pagestyle{empty} % change to \\pagestyle{plain} for page numbers \n\\setcounter{page}{301} % Set start page numbering at e.g. 301\n \n\\begin{document}\n\n\\maketitle\n\n\\begin{abstract}\n%\nThe Filter Exchange System of the LSSTCam at the Vera C. Rubin Observatory\nis a critical subsystem enabling the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) by\nperforming rapid, repeatable exchanges among five large-format filters within a\nhighly constrained in-camera volume. Since the start of on-sky operations in\nApril 2025, the FES has routinely performed up to 40 filter exchanges per night,\ncompleting each change in under \\SI{90}{\\second} with a positioning\nrepeatability of \\SI{100}{\\micro\\meter} in the focal plane.\nSafety and reliability are ensured through a dedicated software architecture.\nDrawing on over a year of operational experience, we report on\nthe in-situ performance of this sophisticated system within the observatory environment,\ncharacterize the key performance metrics, and discuss how specific design\nchoices have influenced system behavior and reliability in practice.\n%\n\\end{abstract}\n\n% Include a list of keywords after the abstract \n\\keywords{Vera Rubin Observatory, LSSTCam, Filter Exchange System, commissioning, PLC, Java, CAN bus}\n\n% ====================================================================================\n\n\\section{Introduction}\n% \\input{intro}\n\\label{sec:intro}\n%\nThe Filter Exchange System (FES; see Ref.~\\citenum{Juramy22}) of the\nLSST Camera (LSSTCam; see Ref.~\\citenum{Lage24}) at the Vera C. Rubin\nObservatory handles five \\SI{75}{\\centi\\meter} diameter filters, each weighing between\n\\SI{25.5}{\\kilogram} and \\SI{38}{\\kilogram}, for a total in-camera mass of\napproximately \\SI{160}{\\kilogram}. \nThe primary requirement of the FES is to perform a filter exchange in less than\n\\SI{90}{\\second}, with a positioning accuracy of \\SI{100}{\\micro\\meter} at the\nfocal plane, while operating within the very tight spatial constraints of the\ncamera body.\n\n\\noindent The FES is composed of three motorized subsystems, each with a specific role:\n\\begin{itemize}\n%\n\\item \\textbf{The Carousel:} stores up to five filters outside the beam, in five\nstands forming a pentagonal shape surrounding the cryostat, named sockets. The\ncarousel has one specific position called \\textit{standby} that acts as the\ninterface with the autochanger. In order for a selected filter on the carousel\nto be installed for operation, its socket must first be rotated to the\n\\textit{standby} position. Seen in Figure~\\ref{fig:fes-elements}.\n%\n\\item \\textbf{The Autochanger:} transfers the filter from the carousel\n\\textit{standby} position to the focal plane along a complex 3D trajectory. It\nthen secures the filter in place with a \\SI{100}{\\micro\\meter} accuracy. Seen in Figure~\\ref{fig:fes-elements}.\n%\n\\item \\textbf{The Loader:} which can be mounted on the camera body during \ndaytime operations, interacts with the autochanger to swap filters in and out\nof the LSSTCam, enabling the use of the full six-filter LSSTCam set. Shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:loader}.\n%\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.85\\linewidth]{figures/LSSTCamExplodedView-FESAnnotated.jpeg}\n \\caption{Exploded view of the LSSTCam with annotated elements of the filter exchange system: \n the carousel and the autochanger. Credit for original image: T. Lange (SLAC)\n }\n \\label{fig:fes-elements}\n\\end{figure}\n\nAt every operational stage, at least one of these subsystems manages the filter using a\ndedicated locking mechanism. The design and qualification processes for the\nFES addresses seismic risks, as well as the observatory’s\ntemperature range and the stringent cleanliness requirements for both filters\nand lenses.\nSystem safety is guaranteed by multiple Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs).\nThe FES control is fully integrated into the Filter Control System\n(FCS) software, which interfaces with all FES hardware, including 13 motors,\napproximately 100 sensors, 22 controllers, 3 PLCs, and one PC104 unit—via a\nrobust CAN bus communication network.\n\nAfter one year of on-sky operations, 3200+ successful filter changes\nhave been performed, with an average of 9 changes per night and up to 40 changes on some nights. This document presents the performance of the\nLSSTCam Filter Exchange System (FES) and evaluates the impact of the design\nchoices made during its development.\n\n% ====================================================================================\n\n\\section{FES hardware during commissioning}\n% \\input{commissioning}\n\\label{sec:commissioning}\n\nThe FES is housed inside the LSSTCam camera body. This enclosed volume maintains\ncirculating air at \\SI{0}{\\percent} humidity to prevent condensation on the\nlarge cryostat entrance window. The integrated LSSTCam camera body environment is drier than the\noriginal FES design assumption, which had anticipated a humidity level of\napproximately \\SI{3}{\\percent}.\nBefore installation on the telescope, the FES had never operated in such dry\nconditions. Consequently, the primary hardware issues encountered during\ncommissioning were linked to the dry atmosphere that was previously unexplored during testing. Although these\nissues have been resolved, it is worth documenting them and highlighting the inherent robustness of the FES design.\n\nTwo components of the FES required\nadaptation during commissioning to address behavior driven by the\nextremely dry environment of the LSSTCam camera body.\n\n\\subsection{Carousel clamp friction}\n\\label{sec:clamp-friction}\n%\nWhen stored in the carousel, each filter is supported at three points: one at\nthe bottom for guidance only, and two on the sides that secure the filter using\nmechanical clamps. These clamps are self-locking, engaging automatically when\nthe autochanger pushes the filter’s side pins into them. Conversely, to allow\nthe autochanger to retrieve the filter, a motor-driven mechanism opens the\nclamps whenever requested by the FCS. Motion is transmitted from the carousel’s fixed section to its rotating\nsection via a magnetic coupling and a cable.\n\nProbes monitor both the clamp state (open/closed) and the filter’s position\nwithin the clamp. Initially, it was expected that the moving parts inside the\nclamps would operate reproducibly with minimal friction, even without grease.\nThe primary reason for avoiding grease was to reduce maintenance requirements,\nas its application would necessitate removing the clamp from the camera and\ndisassembling it.\n\nFrom the start of commissioning, operating for the first time under \\SI{0}{\\percent}\nhumidity, the clamps exhibited significant friction, as evidenced by a\nnoticeable increase in the time required to open them. After two months of\ncommissioning, it became necessary to revise the opening trajectory (motor current vs.\ntime) and increase the driving current. Simultaneously, an automatic\nself-recovery procedure was put in place. This procedure (see\nSection~\\ref{sec:autorecovery}) involves briefly actuating the unclamping motor\nto relieve tension in the unlocking cable, thereby facilitating proper clamp\nclosure.\n\nThis self-recovery procedure—automatically triggered by the slow control system\nwhen clamp closure is not detected within \\SI{2}{\\second}, despite the filter\nbeing in its expected position—was triggered with increasing frequency after its initial integration in September 2025. After\ntwo months, the procedure had to be systematically applied to two of the ten\nclamps. Ultimately, one clamp failed completely, reducing the number of usable\nfilters from five to four until maintenance could be performed. In October 2025, \nall clamps underwent maintenance:\n%\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item All clamps were disassembled and inspected.\n%\n\\item The non-operational clamp exhibited significant friction during manual\noperation. However, this friction decreased substantially after the clamp was\nexposed for one day to a controlled environment at \\SI{35}{\\percent} humidity.\nThis suggests that humidity affects the surface properties of the moving parts.\n%\n\\item Nevertheless, all clamps still exhibited some friction during manual\noperation, even two days after removal from the dry environment of the camera. While\nthis low-level friction may have always been present, it is likely highly\ndependent on surface properties and humidity.\n%\n\\end{itemize}\n\nTo address this issue, a minimal amount of grease was applied to the main\nsliding surfaces inside the clamps. The objective was to create a thin layer\nensuring consistent sliding properties, regardless of ambient humidity. After\nthe maintenance and a subsequent testing period, the current required to open the clamps was reduced by\napproximately \\SI{20}{\\percent} (about \\SI{1}{\\ampere}). This intervention fully\nresolved the issue: clamp operations are back to their nominal speed and are\nhighly reproducible (see Figure~\\ref{fig:fes-unlock}). \n \n\n% Following this maintenance the duration and dispersion of the filter exchange time has been improved as shown in fig:\\ref{fig:fes-setfilter_jitter} (see also Section \\ref{sec:performance})\n%\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n % \\includegraphics[width=0.45\\linewidth]{figures/UnlockClampDurationHistBefore.png}\n % \\includegraphics[width=0.45\\linewidth]{figures/UnlockClampDurationHistAfter.png}\n \\includegraphics[width=0.95\\linewidth]{figures/unlock_clamp_heatmap.png}\n % \\caption{Histograms of the filter pins \\texttt{unlock} time before (15 August to\n % 15 September 2025 on the left) and after (15 November to 15 December 2025 on\n % the right) the carousel maintenance in October 2025} \n \\caption{Set of heatmaps showing the \\texttt{unlock} duration of all the carousel socket X+ and X- clamps before (left) and after (right) the October 2025 maintenance. We can see that the unlocking duration of the X- clamp of sockets 1 and 4 was particularly slow compared to the others, exhibiting signs of internal friction, that was fully solved after the lubrication during maintenance. Due to an unexpected hardware issue, socket 3 was deactivated mid-July 2025, which is why it does not appear on the left heatmap.}\n \\label{fig:fes-unlock}\n\\end{figure}\n\nThese surface property changes caused by the extreme dryness inside the\ncamera enclosure had an additional unexpected effect on signal and current transmission to and from the rotating part of the\ncarousel.\n\n\\subsection{Carousel collector friction}\n\\label{sec:collectors}\n%\nThe carousel rotates to position filters for the autochanger. Electrical power\nand sensor signals from the rotating section are transmitted via five copper\nslip rings on the back flange and carbon–silver brushes (called\n\\textit{collectors}) mounted on the rotating part. The brushes are spring-loaded\nto ensure continuous contact with the copper rings.\n\nAt the start of operations in the dry atmosphere, communication errors related to\nthe slip-ring system started to appear. Each channel uses two collectors: one for power\ntransmission and the other for CAN bus signal transmission. In late April 2025,\nhowever, one channel completely lost communication capability. Disassembly of\nthe faulty collector revealed that one carbon–silver pin was stuck and\nnon-operational (see Figure~\\ref{fig:collector}). Notably, after approximately 24\nhours in a $\\approx$\\SI{35}{\\percent} humidity environment outside the camera, the residual\nfriction, present after manually freeing the contact, had disappeared.\n\nIn practice, the issue inside the camera gradually resolved itself over time:\nsystem operation provided a beneficial burn-in, gradually smoothing the\nincreased surface roughness caused by the dry atmosphere. The error rate,\ninitially at zero, rose to over one communication glitch per rotation at the\nstart of operations in April 2025, and returned to zero by mid-May 2025.\n%\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.48\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.9\\textwidth]{figures/loader.jpg}\n \\caption{One of the two FES loaders, connected to the LSSTCam during a filter swap operation. Photo credit: T. Lange (SLAC)}\n \\label{fig:loader}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\hfill\n \\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.48\\textwidth}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[angle=90, width=0.8\\textwidth]{figures/IMG_3029.png}\n \\caption{The faulty collector after removal from the carousel, with the left carbon–silver contact\n blocked in a ``spring compressed'' position due to friction. The other two carbon–silver contacts are fully extended in their nominal position.\n % A friction between the carbon-silver part and the PEEK body could not be overcome by the spring.\n }\n \\label{fig:collector}\n \\end{subfigure}\n \\vspace{0.3em}\n % \\includegraphics[width=0.40\\linewidth]{figures/loader.jpg}\n % \\includegraphics[angle=90, width=0.36\\linewidth]{figures/IMG_3029.png}\n \\caption{Photos showing the FES loader attached to LSSTCam, and the faulty carousel collector.}\n % \\caption{Left image, the FES loader connected to the LSSTCam during a filter swap operation. Right image: the faulty collector just after removal from carousel. One of the\n % three carbon-silver contacts of the collector (on the left) is\n % blocked in a \"spring compressed\" position. A friction between the\n % carbon–silver part and the PEEK body could not be overcome by the spring.} \n \\label{fig:photos}\n\\end{figure}\n\n% ====================================================================================\n\n\\section{FES protection system}\n% \\input{plc}\n\\label{sec:plc}\n\n\\subsection{PLC and FES protection system}\n%\nProgrammable Logic Controllers (PLCs) are designed to protect the filters\nfrom incorrect or dangerous FES operations. Using input from probes and sensors\nthat continuously monitor the system state, the PLCs either enable or block\nspecific operations based on the current FES state. In real time, the PLCs\ndeactivate system components by controlling power to the motors via relays.\n\nTo prevent collisions between the filter and the carousel while the\nautochanger is moving the filter, the logic follows:\n%\n\\begin{itemize}\n%\n\\item The relay powering the autochanger motors is enabled only when the\ncarousel is in a position and configuration compatible with autochanger\nmovement.\n%\n\\item The carousel rotation controller does not receive the \\SI{48}{\\volt}\nrequired to power its motor. Even if a rotation command is issued, it cannot be\nexecuted.\n%\n\\end{itemize}\n\nThis approach provides both a physical authorization for requested operations\nand an automatic stop if the system enters an unexpected state. In addition to\nthe PLC, two further protection layers exist:\n\\begin{itemize}\n%\n\\item An upper layer at the slow-control software level, which verifies that the requested operation is compatible with the current FES\nstate prior\nto execution. Its primary purpose is to prevent human errors that would otherwise\ntrigger a PLC interruption, which would then require explicit error\nacknowledgment and a controller reset before any new operation could proceed.\n%\n\\item A lower layer at the motor controller level: these controllers are\nconfigured to interrupt motion if the trajectory deviates excessively from\nexpectations, such as in the case of an unexpected obstacle or abnormal\nfriction.\n\n%\n\\end{itemize}\n\nThe full set of PLC logic equations and behaviors was qualified prior to camera\ninstallation on the telescope. However, during commissioning, we refined\nsome of the logic to minimize excessive relay activations during nightly telescope\noperations.\n\n\\subsection{PLC upgrade during commissioning}\n\\label{sub:plc-upgrade}\n\n\\noindent The FES PLC commissioning included:\n%\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item Fine-tuning the allowed movement ranges based on position limit switch values, to\naccount for the final system configuration and the summit temperature range.\n%\n\\item Adjustment of delays before PLC state changes to mitigate glitches\nobserved in some probes during FES operation.\n%\n\\item Deactivation of the PLCs during non-FES operations.\n\\end{itemize}\n\nThe third adjustment was initially implemented only for the carousel PLC, as a\nside effect of disabling carousel probes outside filter changes. This was\nintended to reduce power dissipation within the camera. However, during commissioning, this PLC sleep mode had to be extended to the\nautochanger PLC. Autochanger movements are permitted only within a narrow camera\nrotator angle range (\\ang{\\pm5}), ensuring the autochanger rails remain aligned\nwith gravity, a requirement for proper filter displacement in the compact camera\nenvironment. The carousel PLC monitors this orientation using an inclinometer\nwith a resolution of approximately \\ang{0.4}.\n\nDuring telescope tracking, the trajectory combined with inclinometer measurement\nnoise can cause high-frequency on/off switching of the autochanger motor relays.\nTo prevent premature relay aging, the PLC is deactivated when the FES is\nidle, namely at the end of each filter change, and reactivated just before\nthe next operation begins.\n\nThis PLC sleep mode, particularly its ability to quickly restore full operation\nat the start of a filter change, is detailed in Section~\\ref{sec:wake-up}.\n\n\\subsection{FES protection system in action}\n\nFrom April 2025 to May 2026, in addition to protecting the whole system against human error and routine operations that go awry, the\nFES protection system executed several critical interventions, demonstrating its\ncapabilities.\n\nBetween April and December 2025, the PLC prevented FES operations 16\ntimes, with no further occurrences afterward. Most of these vetoes occurred\nduring the core commissioning phase and were linked to non-optimal system\nconfigurations or wake-up issues from sleep mode, which required time to\noptimize (see Section~\\ref{sec:wake-up}).\n\nOne notable event, related to the carousel clamp friction described in\nSection~\\ref{sec:clamp-friction}, is worth highlighting. Under normal\nconditions (i.e., without friction), the clamp opens passively when a filter pin\nenters it to reach its storage position. On this occasion, one carousel clamp blocked the\nfilter as its pins entered, preventing it from finishing the movement. \nThis resulted in an asymmetric configuration: one\nfilter pin was partially inserted into its clamp, while the other remained stuck\noutside. While the PLC temporarily allows this system configuration as a transition\nstate, it is only tolerated for a short period. After this delay, the system\ntriggered a shutdown of the autochanger motor power to prevent excessive and\npotentially damaging force. Following this event, the PLC inhibited all\nfurther FES operations.\n\nTrending data—recorded at approximately \\SI{10}{\\hertz} during FES\noperation and including the state of all probes and motors—made it possible to\ndiagnose the cause of the interruption (i.e., a clamp blocking the movement).\nThe camera was then positioned horizontally, and the PLC was manually overridden\nto open the faulty clamp using a dedicated manual current ramp.\nThe PLC was reactivated, enabling safe storage of the filter in the carousel, and\nmaintenance of the faulty clamp was scheduled (see\nSection~\\ref{sec:clamp-friction}).\n\nThe PLCs, despite being programmable, are among the lowest-level layers of system programming.\nMost updates are made to the slow-control layer called the Filter Control System (FCS).\n\n% ====================================================================================\n\n\\section{FES slow-control system: FCS}\n% \\input{fcs}\n\nThe FES system control and operations rely on three software layers: \n%\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item \\textbf{Top level:} a Java-based system for communicating with the hardware\nusing the CAN bus protocol, executing filter exchanges, monitoring the entire\nsystem, and hosting a graphical user interface for daily maintenance operations.\n%\n\\item \\textbf{Intermediate level:} the micro-code of the various motor\ncontrollers combined with their configuration parameters that execute the\noperations in the requested steps.\n%\n\\item \\textbf{Base level:} the protection system, PLC-based, that continuously ensures\nfilter safety.\n%\n\\end{itemize}\n\nThe flexibility, complementarity, and robustness of this software design have\nbeen demonstrated throughout commissioning. However, the high mechanical\ncomplexity of the FES—which combines extreme spatial constraints with fast,\nprecise filter motion—makes the hardware inherently less flexible to modify than the software. While software optimizations are essential during\ncommissioning, key features—such as the mechanisms that securely hold the\nfilters without over-constraining them, or the 3D motion profile that limits\nfilter acceleration to $\\lesssim$\\,\\SI{1.5}{\\gee}—are complex and require careful\ntesting and qualification before deploying software changes to the camera that\ncould affect real filters.\n\n\\subsection{Software optimization during commissioning}\n\nWhile the final qualification of slow-control software typically occurs during\non-site commissioning in Chile—where it competes with observatory operations—the availability of\na full-scale FES demonstrator and camera motion test bench at LPNHE laboratory in Paris enabled\nindependent integration, testing, and refinement prior to deployment on LSSTCam. This test infrastructure has been\nessential for slow-control upgrades, optimization, and troubleshooting, enabling\ndetailed analysis of issues encountered during LSSTCam commissioning without\nimpacting observatory operations.\n\nAnother valuable resource during the commissioning period was the on-site presence of\nCamera-FES team members at the observatory. In particular, on the software\nside—which is often the last to receive development and qualification time—one\nteam member was full-time in Chile from October 2024 to November 2025 to bring\nthe FES control software (FCS) to operational readiness.\n\nThe rest of the section highlights key improvements made to the Filter Control\nSystem (FCS) during commissioning that have significantly enhanced overall\nsystem performance.\n\n\\subsection{Loader operation}\n\nChanging the set of filters inside the camera requires the use of the filter loader\nsystem. This device (seen in Figure~\\ref{fig:loader}), which inserts and\nextracts filters from the camera, must operate safely under the control of the\nFES PLC.\n\nIn practice, all loader electrical and software connections have been\nimplemented as a ``hot-plug'' operation. The loader, only used during daytime\noperations for loading and unloading filters, can be dynamically connected to\nand disconnected from the camera, the power supply, the protection system and the FCS.\n\nBecause the power line cannot, by design, be de-energized at the camera\nlevel, dedicated protections have been implemented on the loader side to\neliminate any risk during cable connection. The PLC logic accounts for the\npresence or absence of the loader and extends its functionality accordingly when\nthe loader is connected.\n\nA dedicated CAN bus is used for the loader, fully independent of the\ncarousel/autochanger CAN bus. It operates over longer cables and therefore at a\nlower bitrate than the rest of the FES system (\\SI{125}{\\kilo\\bps} versus\n\\SI{1}{\\mega\\bps}).\n\nThe software library used to manage the CAN bus on the FES PC104 successfully\nsupports hot-plug connection, initialization, and disconnection of the loader,\nwithout requiring a restart of the FCS software. The entire operation can be \nhandled by a software operator from a graphical user interface which displays \nlive the status of the various sensors, the power supply switches, and two buttons:\none to extract a filter from the camera into the loader, and one to insert a filter from the loader into the camera.\n\nThe sequencing of the underlying hardware operations has been carefully tuned\nand tested over a few dozen live operations to minimize blocking points, and\nthis full hot-plug capability has now been in operation for more than six months\nwithout a single issue.\n\n\n\\subsection{FES integration within observatory control}\n\n\\subsubsection{FES degraded mode}\n\\label{sec:degraded}\n\nTo enhance system robustness and safety during interaction with the\nobservatory, we implemented a degraded mode that allows the camera to continue\noperating seamlessly after acknowledging that some components of the FES are unavailable. It\nprevents the system from entering a fault state when the FES\nfunctionality is partially compromised. This ensures uninterrupted imaging under\nsuboptimal conditions, whether due to daytime checkout results or in-night\nfailures. The mode accommodates several scenarios, including:\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item Unusable carousel sockets, rendering specific filters unavailable.\n \\item Inoperable carousel or autochanger, restricting use to the currently\n installed filter.\n \\item Rotation failure, limiting operation to the currently loaded filter, including no filter.\n\\end{itemize}\n\nDegraded mode can be activated via CCS engineering mode, either at the start\nof the night or dynamically in response to failures. Depending on the above\ndegraded scenario, it will immediately forward the list of currently available filters to the\nobservatory, meaning the list of installed filters in the camera\nexcluding those that cannot safely be placed in the focal plane.\n\n\\subsubsection{FES sleep mode / wake up}\n\\label{sec:wake-up}\n\nTo optimize energy efficiency within the LSSTCam, the FES carousel supports a\nlow power mode (also referred to as sleep mode), reducing consumption during\nidle periods and avoiding heat buildup inside the camera body. While this mode\nintroduces a $\\approx$\\,\\SI{5}{\\second} overhead to wake up the system before\nexecuting a filter change, this cost is small compared to the energy savings it provides. Additionally,\nthis overhead can fully disappear if the wake up is executed in anticipation\nof a filter change, though this has not yet been implemented at the observatory level.\n\nDevelopment of this feature spanned several months, with incremental\nimprovements to both backend and user interface. In early 2025, the work focused on\ncore power state logic and integration with primary commands. By mid-2025, we\nintroduced automated power-saving after filter changes as well as checks to\nprevent a ``bad wake up'', meaning FES actions executed while the system is\nnot fully responsive, leading to system alerts. Finally, we made this\nfunctionality available at the observatory level so it can be controlled by\noperators outside of the camera software. \n\n\\noindent We thus offer three operational modes:\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item \\textbf{SLEEP}: enforces low power mode.\n\\item \\textbf{WAKEUP}: transitions to high power mode in anticipation of a\nfilter change, automatically reverting to low power afterward.\n\\item \\textbf{STAYUP}: maintains carousel power indefinitely, ideal for maintenance\nor high-frequency operations.\n\\end{itemize}\n\n\\subsubsection{Live filter monitoring}\n\\label{sec:filter-monit}\n\nThe communication between the observatory and the camera subsystems is layered,\nwith the observatory control system written in Python and the entire camera\ncontrol system written in Java. The communication layer built on top\nensures fast information flow and keeps the observatory constantly aware of the\nstatus of every camera subsystem.\n\nBecause the FES is one such subsystem, an important task was to ensure that\nthe full system status—particularly the filter currently in place—is accessible\nto the observatory, guaranteeing that the recorded metadata remains valid at all\ntimes during operations. To this end, all camera subsystems define two main\nstates: \\texttt{NORMAL} and \\texttt{ENGINEERING}. The \\texttt{ENGINEERING} mode\nindicates that the camera team is manually working on the subsystem and is in\ncharge, signaling to the observatory that the camera is unavailable for\noperations. To enter operational mode, every camera subsystem must first switch\nto \\texttt{NORMAL} mode.\n\nThe transition from \\texttt{ENGINEERING} to \\texttt{NORMAL} state for the FES\nevolved as the team gained confidence in the system’s reliability, reaching a\nlevel where we require a filter to be placed in the focal plane and ready for\nobservations before this transition is completed. In practice, this means the\nsystem is returned to the observatory in a state where sky images can be\ncaptured immediately, without requiring a double-check of the subsystem’s\nstatus.\n\n\\subsection{Auto-recoveries}\n\\label{sec:autorecovery} \n\nThe implementation of auto-recovery procedures has both improved the reliability\nof FES operations—ensuring uninterrupted execution—and significantly enhanced\nrepeatability. In particular, FES motion execution now demonstrates reduced\ntiming jitter.\n\nGiven the high speed and complexity of FES operations, some mechanical\nvariability is expected over time. The system experiences a wide range of forces\nand constraints, depending on filter mass, telescope orientation, operational\nconditions, and interactions between subsystems (controllers, motors, and\nmechanisms).\n\nThe guiding principle of these auto-recovery procedures is to leverage the\nextensive sensor network and real-time system state monitoring to detect\nout-of-tolerance behavior and take immediate corrective action, restoring the\nsystem to its optimal operating state. These procedures can also recover from\nfailures, including controller errors, by automatically resolving the underlying\nissue and resuming normal operation without human intervention.\n\n\\noindent Below are two examples of auto-recovery procedures implemented in the FCS:\n%\n\\begin{itemize}\n%\n\\item \\textbf{Carousel clamp unlocking:} friction in the clamp mechanism can\nprevent timely opening when using the nominal current. However, a reconfigured\nactuation mode that applies higher current can overcome this condition. Although\nthis ``slow mode'' increases operation time and accelerates system wear, it is\nused selectively as an auto-recovery mechanism. This allows operations to\ncontinue while maintenance (e.g., re-greasing) is scheduled at a convenient\ntime,\n%\n\\item \\textbf{Filter load force relaxation:} when a filter mounted in the loader\nis transported within the dome using the crane, mechanical constraints can build\nup in the hook mechanism that holds the filter. As the filter begins to move\ndown into the camera, the PLC may interpret these forces as unexpected motion,\ntriggering an interruption. The auto-recovery procedure detects this pre-load\ncondition before motion begins, releases the constraint, and then safely\ninitiates the in-camera filter loading sequence.\n%\n\\end{itemize}\n\n% ====================================================================================\n\n\\section{Performance}\n% \\input{perf}\n\\subsection{Number of filter changes}\n\nDuring the LSST survey operations, we expect a rate of filter changes up to\n$\\approx$17 per night. To this rate, we should add 1 to 5 filter changes during\ndaytime to take into account telescope calibration and FES daily operations\nfor maintenance or filter swap. \n\nDuring this year of commissioning, from the 14th of April 2025 to the 14th of\nApril 2026, we counted:\n%\n\\begin{itemize}\n \\item a total of 3222 filter changes (averaging to $\\approx$9 filter changes a day),\n \\item 85 days without a filter change (maintenance, AOS tuning, bad weather),\n \\item 197 days with 5 filter changes or more,\n \\item 132 days with 10 filter changes or more,\n \\item 49 days with 20 filter changes or more,\n \\item 71 filter changes – maximum recorded during a single night, associated\n with the commissioning of the filter focus offset.\n\\end{itemize}\n\nTo avoid overheating of the FES autochanger motors, a \\SI{2}{\\minute} pause\nbetween two filter exchanges is requested, limiting the maximum rate to 15\nfilter changes per hour during normal operations. For specific targets of\nopportunity, this limitation can be ignored for a maximum of $\\approx$5 successive\nfilter changes in order to keep the increase of the FES autochanger motor\ntemperature below \\SI{20}{\\degreeCelsius}.\n\n% ---\n\n\\subsection{Filter change duration and associated telescope overhead}\n\\label{sec:duration}\n\nThe time used to perform a filter change is an overhead to the light\ncollection, and has to be minimized. The design goal for the execution time of a\nfilter change is \\SI{90}{\\second} for the filter change itself by the FES to\nwhich we should add \\SI{30}{\\second} to set up the telescope in the right\nconfiguration and to go back to normal operation. \n\nAs shown in Figure~\\ref{fig:fes-setfilter_jitter}, the mean execution time of the\nFES filter change is between \\SI{82}{\\second} and \\SI{85}{\\second} depending on the distance the carousel has to travel to fetch the next filter. In both cases we are well below the requirement after the\ncarousel clamp friction underwent maintenance (see Section~\\ref{sec:clamp-friction}).\n\nThe main dispersion in the filter exchange time corresponds to the pentagonal\ngeometry of the FES carousel leading to two given filters being separated by\neither one or two slots in any direction. Hence, during a filter change, the\ncarousel must either be rotated by 1/5 or 2/5 turn, leading to the two plots\nat the top of Figure~\\ref{fig:fes-setfilter_jitter}.\n%\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n % \\includegraphics[width=0.45\\linewidth]{figures/SetFilterTimeBefore.png}\n % \\includegraphics[width=0.45\\linewidth]{figures/SetFilterTimeAfter.png}\n \\includegraphics[width=0.95\\linewidth]{figures/SetFilterMaintenanceImpact.png}\n \\caption{Top panels: Kernel density estimates of the filter change (\\texttt{SetFilter} calls) duration distribution split by carousel rotation distance (1-socket and 2-socket) for each period. Median durations decreased after maintenance in both cases (1-socket: \\SI{86.3}{\\second} to \\SI{81.8}{\\second}; 2-socket: \\SI{90.9}{\\second} to \\SI{85.1}{\\second}), and the distributions narrowed, suggesting more consistent filter-exchange performance overall. Bottom panel: A bar chart of automated recovery rates (as a percentage of all \\texttt{SetFilter} calls) explaining the tails or second peaks in the above distributions. We list here carousel realignment, carousel brakes warm up, and both combined. The carousel realignment rate decreased from \\SI{29.6}{\\percent} to \\SI{17.5}{\\percent}, indicating improved carousel balance post-maintenance. However, the carousel brakes warm up rate rose from \\SI{0.5}{\\percent} to \\SI{22}{\\percent}, reflecting an issue that emerged from the low number of filter exchanges during the period examined and the recent adoption of this recovery method. Fortunately, these recoveries never seem to happen during the same operation. Overall, the filter exchange duration is now well below the system requirement of \\SI{90}{\\second}.\n }\n \\label{fig:fes-setfilter_jitter}\n\\end{figure}\n\nOn top of these peaks, a small tail visible in\nFigure~\\ref{fig:fes-setfilter_jitter} is associated with two other effects:\n% \n\\begin{itemize}\n%\n \\item \\textbf{Carousel brakes warmup (\\SI{5}{\\second}):} if the carousel has\n not been used for more than \\SI{5}{\\hour}, its brakes must be operated\n independently to ensure rapid opening during normal use. This addresses a\n sticky contact issue that occurs when the brakes remain closed for extended\n periods. This process takes $\\approx$\\SI{5}{\\second} at the start of each night\n to warm them up.\n %\n \\item \\textbf{Carousel realignment (\\SI{3}{\\second}):} the carousel brakes\n are in contact with the main gear tooth, but due to backlash between the brake\n and the gear tooth, the gear can still move by approximately\n \\SI{200}{\\micro\\meter}, especially if the telescope moves or the camera\n rotates. The tolerance we impose for the carousel-autochanger offset is\n below~\\SI{100}{\\micro\\meter}. If this misalignment is detected prior to a filter\n change, the carousel automatically performs a small realignment with the\n autochanger before storing the filter, which takes \\SI{3}{\\second}.\n%\n\\end{itemize}\n\nThe overhead associated with moving the camera rotator to \\ang{0} and back to\nits target value is \\SI{0.27}{\\second\\per\\degree}, in addition to a constant\noverhead of \\SI{32}{\\second}. For an average \\ang{\\pm45} rotation, this results\nin a dead time of \\SI{57}{\\second} for the telescope operation associated with a\nfilter exchange. At this stage of commissioning, the total dead time associated\nwith a filter change is \\SI{141}{\\second}, that is \\SI{21}{\\second} longer than\nthe target. There is still room for optimization that has not yet been\nimplemented, due to other priorities in observatory optimization and\ncommissioning.\n% \n\\begin{itemize} \n %\n \\item Currently, telescope tracking is stopped\n and restarted during a filter change. This protection configuration, set during commissioning,\n should be removed over time after testing on-summit.\n %\n \\item While the camera rotator must be at zero for a filter change, LSST survey strategy can minimize the required rotation at the time of\n the filter change by requesting a filter change when the rotator is closest to \\ang{0}.\n %\n \\item The duration quoted above for the pure-FES filter change does not include the FES\n wake-up time ($\\leq \\SI{5}{\\second}$, see Section~\\ref{sec:wake-up}). This\n operation can be performed in parallel with the telescope setup, prior to\n the start of the filter exchange at the FES level. This is not yet activated\n at the telescope control level; however, this duration is included in the\n telescope overhead, not the FES overhead.\n%\n\\end{itemize}\n\n% ---\n\n\\subsection{Filter positioning repeatability}\n\nGiven the constrained available space and the large size of the LSSTCam filters,\nthe designed filter exchange solution involves large movements, complex 3D\ntrajectories, and relatively high speeds. For example, the autochanger’s main\nmovement to transport the $\\approx$\\SI{30}{\\kilogram} filter from the focal\nplane to its carousel socket takes \\SI{6}{\\second} to cover\n\\SI{91}{\\centi\\meter} (excluding the \\SI{9}{\\centi\\meter} of slow-speed approach\nmovement), with a \\ang{90} change in direction. Despite this complexity, the stability of the instrument’s\nphotometric response is paramount. Although the spatial uniformity of LSST\nfilters is very good, it is not perfect, and even in a controlled, enclosed\nenvironment, the presence of dust particles on the filters cannot be entirely\nexcluded. Therefore, the filter position in the plane transverse to the optical\naxis must be reproducible with an acceptable tolerance of\n\\SI{100}{\\micro\\meter}, in order to preserve LSSTCam optical performance.\n\nIn the X–Y plane, this reproducibility is achieved through the FES autochanger\nclamping system. Positioning in the X direction is\ndirectly driven and monitored by the autochanger’s dual-arm trucks and their\nencoders. This achieves a reproducibility of approximately\n\\SI{50}{\\micro\\meter}—an order of magnitude better than required. In the Y\ndirection, dedicated position sensors monitor and ensure consistent filter\npresentation to the focal plane clamps, regardless of telescope pointing and\ngravity effects.\n\nWhile the absolute positioning may vary slightly from one filter to another due\nto small differences in their mechanical interfaces with the clamping system,\nthe measured positioning reproducibility remains below \\SI{100}{\\micro\\meter} peak-to-peak, as\nillustrated for the Y direction in Figure~\\ref{fig:yposition},\na factor of three better than required.\n%\n\\begin{figure}\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=0.90\\linewidth]{figures/FilterStabilityAlongY_violin.png}\n \\caption{The\n positional reproducibility over the three-month period is shown, with peak-to-peak\n within $\\pm$\\,\\SI{100}{\\micro\\meter}, across all filters. In practice,\n the observed dispersion is associated with position changes at each filter\n exchange, as the monitoring indicates displacement below\n \\SI{1}{\\micro\\meter} once the filter is in place.\n }\n \\label{fig:yposition}\n\\end{figure}\n\n% ---\n\n\\subsection{Swapping filters in/out of LSSTCam}\n\nAmong the six LSSTCam filters, \\{\\textit{u, g, r, i, z, y}\\}, the camera body\ncan only hold five simultaneously, resulting in a need for what we call filter\nswaps. During a filter swap, one of the two FES loaders extracts one of the five filters\nout of the camera, and the other FES loader inserts the sixth filter. While we could imagine a turnover\nbetween all six filters, in practice, only the filters at both ends of the\nspectrum, \\textit{u} and \\textit{y}, are swapped alternately every other week,\ncorresponding to moon cycles. Over the past year, in addition to routine\n\\textit{u}/\\textit{y} swaps, the loaders have also been used to install\ntechnical filters such as the pinhole filter or the empty frame, and to insert\nor remove filters for safe maintenance access.\n\nThe filter swap procedure takes about two hours and involves the two FES loaders\n(each weighing $\\approx$\\SI{200}{\\kilogram} with a filter inside). One is used to\nextract a filter from the camera, and the second to install a new one. Most of\nthis operation is spent moving securely and sequentially the loaders from their\nchariot on the dome floor to the camera on the telescope, using the dome crane\n(\\SI{20}{\\minute} each way). Once removed from the camera, the unused filter can\nstay inside a loader, ready for the next swap operation. Due to ongoing\nconstruction activities in the dome, the loaders are currently stored in the\nobservatory clean room. In the future, they will remain inside the dome\nand be connected to a clean airflow system.\n\nA filter swap operation requires four persons in radio contact the whole time: a\ncrane operator, two mechanical operators whose role is to secure the interface\nbetween the camera and the FES loaders (opening and closing panels, cleaning the\ndust, managing the external power cables and CAN bus lines), and one software\noperator that controls the FES via the Filter Control System (FCS). The\nqualification of the swap procedure, the full automation of FES operations, and\nteam training were successfully completed by November 2025. \n\nOver one year (April 2025 to April 2026), we report:\n\n\\begin{itemize}\n%\n\\item 54 filter load or unload operations (including operations to/from a\nfilter storage box in the clean room),\n%\n\\item 11 \\textit{u}/\\textit{y} filter swaps (23 swaps per year are expected during\nnormal operations),\n%\n\\item 16 additional filter swaps requested for maintenance ($\\leq$5 per year\nexpected during normal operations).\n%\n\\end{itemize}\n\n% ---\n\n\\subsection{Error rate evolution from April 2025 to April 2026}\n\nIn the first six months of the commissioning, the error rate requiring human\nintervention decreased from \\SI{5}{\\percent} to $\\lesssim$\\,\\SI{0.1}{\\percent} of\nfilter changes. Issues encountered have been mitigated by \n\\begin{itemize} \n\\item FES, probes and PLC optimization, driven by operating the FES\nin the observatory environment.\n\\item Software, mainly by writing/extending auto-recovery methods (see Section\n\\ref{sec:autorecovery}).\n\\item Hardware interventions on the camera in May and October 2025, to address\nearly-life issues in the system (see Sections \\ref{sec:clamp-friction} and\n\\ref{sec:collectors}).\n\\end{itemize}\n\n% ====================================================================================\n\n\\section{Conclusion}\n\nAfter one year of on-sky operations from April 2025 to April 2026, the LSSTCam\nFilter Exchange System has demonstrated reliable, high-performance operation\nwithin the Vera C. Rubin Observatory. Over this period, 3222 filter changes were\nexecuted, up to 40 per night, with a mean execution time of \\SI{84}{\\second}, well\nbelow the \\SI{90}{\\second} requirement.\n\nCommissioning revealed unexpected hardware challenges, primarily driven by the\n\\SI{0}{\\percent} humidity environment inside the camera enclosure. These affected\nthe carousel clamp and slip-ring collector mechanisms. Both issues were\nsuccessfully diagnosed and resolved through targeted hardware interventions—in\nparticular, re-greasing the clamp sliding surfaces—and complemented by software\nauto-recovery procedures that maintained operations in the interim with minimal\nhuman intervention.\n\nOn the software side, the Filter Control System underwent significant\ndevelopment, delivering key capabilities including FES degraded mode for graceful\ndegradation, a PLC sleep/wake cycle to reduce power dissipation, hot-plug loader\nintegration, and automated self-recovery procedures. These improvements drove the\nFES error rate requiring human intervention from \\SI{5}{\\percent} at the start of\noperations to below \\SI{0.1}{\\percent} within six months.\n\nThe commissioning of the FES was formally declared complete in December 2025.\nOngoing efforts focus on long-term monitoring and stability, in particular\nleveraging the full-scale FES demonstrator in Paris to study and qualify future\nupgrades before deployment—an asset that has proven invaluable throughout\ncommissioning. The system is now well positioned to support the full duration of\nthe LSST survey.\n\n% ====================================================================================\n\n\\acknowledgements\n\nThis material is based upon work supported in part by the National Science Foundation through Cooper-\native Agreements AST-1258333 and AST-2241526 and Cooperative Support Agreements AST-1202910 and\nAST2211468 managed by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA), and the De-\npartment of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515 with the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory\nmanaged by Stanford University. Additional Rubin Observatory funding comes from private donations, grants\nto universities, and in-kind support from LSST-DA Institutional Members. \nThis work has been supported by the French National Institute of Nuclear and Particle Physics (IN2P3) through dedicated funding provided by\nthe National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS). The authors thank Sean MacBride for the thoughtful review of the manuscript.\n\n\n% References\n\\bibliography{report} % bibliography data in report.bib\n\\bibliographystyle{spiebib} % makes bibtex use spiebib.bst\n\n\\end{document} \n\n\n================================================\nFILE: report.bib\n================================================\n%% report.bib - contains BiBtex input for bibliography\n\n@inproceedings{Juramy22, \n\tauthor = \"Pierre Antilogus, et al.\", \n\ttitle = \"Design, assembly and validation of the Filter Exchange System of LSSTCam.\", \n booktitle= \"Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes IX\",\n\tseries = \"Proc. SPIE\", \n\tvolume = \"12182\",\n\tpages = \"121823A\", \n\tyear = \"2022\"\t}\n \n@inproceedings{Lage24, \n\tauthor = \"Travis Lange, et al.\", \n\ttitle = \"Integrating the LSST camera\", \n booktitle= \"Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes X\",\n\tseries = \"Proc. SPIE\", \n\tvolume = \"13096\",\n\tpages = \"1309610\", \n\tyear = \"2024\"\t} \n\n\n================================================\nFILE: spie.cls\n================================================\n%% spie.cls - Version 3.40\n%% LaTeX2e class file to format manuscript for SPIE Proceedings\n%% See end of file for history of changes\n%\n% The following commands will not be understood in other classes:\n% \\authorinfo{}, \\keywords{} \n%\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesClass{spie}[2015/08/14 v3.4 SPIE Proceedings class]\n\\LoadClassWithOptions{article} % build on standard article class\n\n\\DeclareOption{a4paper}{%\n \\AtEndOfClass{%\n% \\oddsidemargin -0.61cm % for side margins of 1.93 cm\n% \\evensidemargin -0.61cm % for side margins of 1.93 cm\n \\typeout{a4paper used}\n }\n }\n\n\\DeclareOption{10pt}{\\PassOptionsToClass{10pt}{article}} \n\\DeclareOption{11pt}{\\PassOptionsToClass{11pt}{article}}\n\\DeclareOption{12pt}{\\PassOptionsToClass{12pt}{article}}\n\n\\ProcessOptions\\relax % set margins for a4paper if specified\n\n%% type out specified font size\n\\if0\\@ptsize\\typeout{ten-point font}\\fi\n\\if1\\@ptsize\\typeout{eleven-point font}\\fi\n\\if2\\@ptsize\\typeout{twelve-point font}\\fi\n\n\\RequirePackage{authblk}\n\\RequirePackage{ifthen}\n\\RequirePackage[superscript]{cite}[2003/11/04] % need vers. > 4.01 \n\n%% page format (see \"Sample manuscript showing specifications and style\")\n%% following based on default top and left offset of 1 inch = 25.4mm\n\\topmargin 0.0in % for top margin of 1.00in\n%% the next two side margins are for US letter paper \n%% and are overridden by the a4paper option\n\\oddsidemargin -0.125in % for side margin of 0.875 in\n\\evensidemargin -0.125in % for side margin of 0.875 in\n%\n\\textheight 8.74in % approx 22.2 cm\n\\textwidth 6.75in % approx 17.1 cm\n\\headheight 0in \\headsep 0in % avoid extra space for header\n\\pagestyle{empty} % no page numbers is default\n\\setlength{\\parskip}{1ex plus 1ex minus 0.3ex} % spacing between paragraphs\n\\date{} % avoid date\n\n%% space for floats - figures and tables\n\\setlength{\\abovecaptionskip}{0ex}\n\\setlength{\\floatsep}{0.9ex plus 0.3ex minus 0.6ex} \n\\setlength{\\textfloatsep}{4ex plus 3ex minus 1.5ex}\n\\renewcommand{\\textfraction}{0.10} \n\\renewcommand{\\floatpagefraction}{0.60} \n\\renewcommand{\\topfraction}{0.90} \n\\renewcommand{\\bottomfraction}{0.90}\n\\setcounter{totalnumber}{3} \n\\setcounter{topnumber}{2} \n\\setcounter{bottomnumber}{2} \n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%%%% define \\ample font size %%%%\n%% 10% larger than \\normalsize for 10 pt, \n%% but smaller than \\large\n\\def\\ample{\\large} % insurance\n\n\\def\\setamplefont{\n\\if0\\@ptsize % 10pt text; use 11pt bold fonts\n \\def\\ample{\\@setsize\\large{12pt}\\xipt\\@xipt}\n\\fi\n\n\\if1\\@ptsize % 10pt text; use 11pt bold fonts\n \\def\\ample{\\@setsize\\large{12pt}\\xiipt\\@xiipt}\n\\fi\n\n\\if2\\@ptsize % 12pt text; use 13.2pt bold fonts\n \\renewcommand{\\ample}{\\fontsize{13.2pt}{15.8pt}\\selectfont\\bfseries} \n \\ifcmr \\font\\ample = cmbx17 at 13.2truept \\fi\n\\fi }\n\n\n%%%% define title aspects %%%%\n\\def\\titlefont{\\normalfont\\LARGE\\bfseries} %% insurance\n\\def\\title#1{\\gdef\\@title{\\titlefont #1}} \n\n\\def\\settitlefont{\n%%% identify font used; cmr = Computer Modern Roman, ptm = Times Roman\n\\typeout{\\rmdefault -font_in_spiecls}\n\\def\\cmr{cmr} % variables for font tests\n\\newif\\ifcmr\n\\def\\ptm{ptm}\n\\newif\\ifptm\n\\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\rmdefault}{\\cmr}}{\\cmrtrue}{\\cmrfalse}\n\\ifthenelse{\\equal{\\rmdefault}{\\ptm}}{\\ptmtrue}{\\ptmfalse}\n%%% scale title according to default font and size\n\\if0\\@ptsize % 10pt text; use 16pt bold fonts\n \\renewcommand{\\titlefont}{\\fontsize{16pt}{19.2pt}\\selectfont\\bfseries}\n \\ifcmr \\font\\titlefont = cmbx12 at 16truept \\fi\n\\fi\n% for 11pt text, title font should be 17pt = \\LARGE for 11pt. No change needed\n\\if2\\@ptsize % 12pt text; use 19.2pt bold fonts\n \\renewcommand{\\titlefont}{\\fontsize{19.2pt}{23pt}\\selectfont\\bfseries}\n \\ifcmr \\font\\titlefont = cmbx12 at 19.2truept \\fi\n\\fi }\n\n\\def\\authorinfo#1{\\gdef\\@authorinfo{#1}}\n\\authorinfo{} %% default is empty\n%\\let\\@affiliation\\@empty\n%\\def\\affiliation#1{\\gdef\\@affiliation{#1}}\n\n% Set special footnote indentation for authorinfo\n\\renewcommand\\@makefntext[1]{\\leftskip=1.4em\\hskip-0em\\@makefnmark#1}\n\n\n\\def\\maketitle{\\par \n\\settitlefont\n\\setamplefont\n \\begingroup\n \\def\\thefootnote{\\fnsymbol{footnote}}%\n \\def\\@makefnmark{\\hbox\n to\\z@{$\\m@th^{\\@thefnmark}$\\hss}}%\n \\if@twocolumn\n \\twocolumn[\\@maketitle]%\n \\else \\newpage\n \\global\\@topnum\\z@\n \\@maketitle \\fi \n \\@thanks\n \\endgroup\n \\let\\maketitle\\relax\n \\let\\@maketitle\\relax\n \\gdef\\@thanks{}\\gdef\\@author{}\\gdef\\@title{}\\let\\thanks\\relax\n\n%%%% define footnote attributes %%%%\n\\renewcommand{\\footnotesize}{\\small} % enlarge footnote font to small\n\\renewcommand{\\thefootnote}{\\fnsymbol{footnote}}\n\\ifx\\@authorinfo\\empty \\else\\footnotetext[0]{\\@authorinfo}\\fi \n%% NB use zero to avoid footnote mark\n%% use footnote symbols, not numbers\n\\renewcommand{\\thefootnote}{\\fnsymbol{footnote}} \n\n% Set footnote indentation back to standard\n\\renewcommand\\@makefntext{\\leftskip=0em\\hskip1.4em\\@makefnmark}\n}\n\n\n\n\n% redefine \\and for author list because \\tabular was removed\n\\def\\and{\\bigskip\\\\} \n \n\\def\\@maketitle{\\newpage\n \\null\n% move title to top of page \n\\if0\\@ptsize\\vspace{-10mm}\\else\\vspace{-12mm}\\fi\n \\begin{center}%\n \\ifcmr \n \\if0\\@ptsize {\\typeout{10pt}\\setlength{\\baselineskip}{19.2pt} \\@title \\par} \\fi\n \\if1\\@ptsize {\\typeout{11pt}\\setlength{\\baselineskip}{20.4pt} \\@title \\par} \\fi\n \\if2\\@ptsize {\\typeout{12pt}\\setlength{\\baselineskip}{23pt} \\@title \\par} \\fi\n \\else \n {\\@title \\par} \n \\fi \n% {\\setlength{\\baselineskip}{4.3ex} \\@title \\par}\n \\vskip 3.5mm \n {\\large % author and organization font size \n \\@author \\par} % remove tabular used in article.cls\n \\vskip 1.5ex\t\n {\\large \\@date}%\n \\end{center}%\n \\par\n}\n\n\n%%%% section aspects %%%%\n% all headings bold\n% center section headings, ample size\n\\def\\sectfont{\\centering\\ample\\bf}\n% sub- and subsubsection headings flush left\n\\def\\subsectfont{\\raggedright\\ample\\bf}\n\\def\\subsubsectfont{\\raggedright\\normalsize\\bf}\n\\def\\append{0}\n\n\\def\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}\n {-2.5ex plus -1ex minus -0.5ex}{0.2ex plus 0.5ex minus 0ex}{\\sectfont}} \n\\def\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}\n {-1.5ex plus -1ex minus -0.5ex}{0.1ex plus 0.1ex minus 0.1ex}{\\subsectfont}}\n\\def\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}\n {-1ex plus -1ex minus -0.5ex}{0.1ex plus 0.1ex}{\\subsubsectfont}}\n\n%% from latex.sty \n%% \\@sect{NAME}{LEVEL}{INDENT}{BEFORESKIP}{AFTERSKIP}\n%% {STYLE}[ARG1]{ARG2}\n\\def\\@sect#1#2#3#4#5#6[#7]#8{\\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth\n \\let\\@svsec\\@empty\n \\let\\@svsecp\\@empty\n \\let\\@svsub\\@empty\n \\else\n \\refstepcounter{#1}\n \\edef\\@svsec{\\csname the#1\\endcsname\\hskip 0.5em plus 0.3em}\n \\edef\\@svsecp{\\csname the#1\\endcsname.\\hskip 0.3em plus 0.3em}\n \\edef\\@svsub{\\csname the#1\\endcsname\\hskip 0.5em plus 0.3em}\\fi\n \\@tempskipa #5\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n \\begingroup #6\\relax\n \\ifnum #2=1\n%%(kmh) in appendix, add word appendix in front of section number \n \\ifnum \\append=1 {\\interlinepenalty \\@M \n\t APPENDIX \\@svsecp\\uppercase{#8}\\par}\n\t \\else {\\interlinepenalty \\@M \\@svsecp\\uppercase{#8}\\par}\n\t \\fi\n\t \\else\\ifnum #2=2\n \\noindent{\\interlinepenalty \\@M \\@svsub #8\\par}\n\t \\else\n \\noindent{\\interlinepenalty \\@M \\@svsub #8\\par}\n\t \\fi\n\t \\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}\\addcontentsline\n {toc}{#1}{\\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}\\fi\n #7}\\else\n \\def\\@svsechd{#6\\hskip #3\\relax %% \\relax added 2 May 90\n \\@svsec #8\\csname #1mark\\endcsname\n {#7}\\addcontentsline\n {toc}{#1}{\\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}\\fi\n #7}}\\fi\n \\@xsect{#5}}\n\n%%%%% Special sections %%%%%\n\\def\\abstract{\\section*{ABSTRACT}}\n\\def\\endabstract{}\n\n% Keywords\n\\def\\keywords#1{\n\\par\\vspace{0.5ex}{\\noindent\\normalsize\\bf Keywords:} #1\n\\vspace{0.5ex} %% provide extra space before first section\n}\n\n\\def\\acknowledgments{\\section*{ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}}\n\\def\\endacknowledgments{}\n% include old spelling - which is acceptable, but not preferred\n\\def\\acknowledgements{\\section*{ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}}\n\\def\\endacknowledgements{}\n\n%%%% references %%%%\n% Give the references section a section number\n\\def\\thebibliography#1{\\section*{REFERENCES\\@mkboth\n {REFERENCES}{REFERENCES}}\\list\n {[{\\hskip .02em}\\arabic{enumi}{\\hskip .05em}]}\n {\\settowidth\\labelwidth{[#1]}\\leftmargin\\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\labelsep \\usecounter{enumi}}\n \\def\\newblock{\\hskip .11em plus .33em minus .07em}\n %% reduce vspace between items\n \\parskip -0.7ex plus 0.5ex minus 0ex \n\\if0\\@ptsize\\else\\small\\fi %% smaller fonts\n \\sloppy\\clubpenalty4000\\widowpenalty4000\n \\sfcode`\\.=1000\\relax}\n\\let\\endthebibliography=\\endlist\n\n%%%% Add theorem, lemma, and definition environments %%%%\n% kmh - noindent\n\\def\\@begintheorem#1#2{\n \\par\\noindent\\bgroup{\\sc #1\\ #2. }\\it\\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\@opargbegintheorem#1#2#3{\n \\par\\bgroup{\\sc #1\\ #2\\ (#3). }\\it\\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\@endtheorem{\\egroup}\n\\def\\proof{\\par{\\it Proof}. \\ignorespaces}\n\\def\\endproof{{\\ \\vbox{\\hrule\\hbox{%\n \\vrule height1.3ex\\hskip0.8ex\\vrule}\\hrule\n }}\\par}\n\\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]\n\\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}\n\\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}\n\n%%%% Figure and table captions %%%\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{% % from article.cls\n \\vskip\\abovecaptionskip\n \\sbox\\@tempboxa{{\\footnotesize #1.\\ }{\\footnotesize #2}}%\n \\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize % with period\n {\\footnotesize #1.\\ }{\\footnotesize #2 \\par}\n \\else\n \\global \\@minipagefalse\n \\hb@xt@\\hsize{\\hfil\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n \\fi\n \\vskip\\belowcaptionskip}\n\n%%%% appendix aspects %%%% \n% use \\appendix to start an appendix\n% use \\section{} for each appendix section\n\\def\\appendix{\\def\\append{1}\n \\par\n \\setcounter{section}{0}\n \\setcounter{subsection}{0}\n \\setcounter{subsubsection}{0}\n \\def\\thesection{\\Alph{section}} \n \\def\\thesubsection{\\Alph{section}.\\arabic{subsection}}\n\\def\\thesubsubsection{\n\\Alph{section}.\\arabic{subsection}.\\arabic{subsubsection}}\n}\n\n%% end of spie.cls\n%%\n% History\n% Prepared by Rick Zaccone <zaccone@bucknell.edu> on 6/3/91.\n% Modified by Adrian F Clark <alien@uk.ac.essex> 11-Jan-1992.\n% Modified by Ken Hanson <kmh@lanl.gov> April, 1995\n% Modified by Ken Hanson <kmh@lanl.gov> June 23, 1997\n% Modified by Ken Hanson <kmh@lanl.gov> Nov. 3, 1997\n% Modified by Ken Hanson <kmh@lanl.gov> Dec. 10, 1997\n% Modified by Ken Hanson <kmh@lanl.gov> Mar. 8, 1998\n% Modified by Ken Hanson <kmh@lanl.gov> July 18, 2001\n% Modified by Guenter Milde <G.Milde@physik.tu-dresden.de> \n% August 1, 2001\n% Convert to LaTex2e class and added option a4paper\n% Modified by Ken Hanson <kmh@lanl.gov> August 29, 2001\n% Update SPIE format, including new text field: 6.75 in by 8.75 in\n% citesort.sty embedded to facilitate concatenation of citations.\n% However, citesort may lead to problems when used with babel, \n% in which case it should be removed from this file.\n% 2.70 Modified by Ken Hanson <kmh@lanl.gov> August 29, 2002\n% Remove tabular in maketitle to properly handle long author list.\n% Use of \\and in \\author{} will start new line after inserting a\n% blank line.\n% Remove a4 option, leaving standard a4paper option in place.\n% Remove \\hoffset and \\voffset commands. Defaults are again zero.\n% 2.71 Modified by Ken Hanson <kmh@lanl.gov> Sept. 18, 2002\n% Correct short figure caption format, replacing : with . Thanks Mats.\n% 2.8 Modified by Ken Hanson <kmh2@lanl.gov> July 16, 2003\n% Margins changed to match SPIE's new specs.\n% 2.9 Modified by Ken Hanson <kmh@lanl.gov> January 23, 2006\n% Fixed bug; CMR fonts used for title with times package. Moved text \n% slightly for A4 paper at suggestion of Markus Knauer.\n% 3.00 Modified by Ken Hanson <kmh@lanl.gov> March 5, 2006\n% Proper sized font for title and section headings for times package \n% and other fonts. Use latest cite.sty for citations instead of \n% imbedded code. Beware of incompatabilities with Babel and hyperref.\n% 3.10 Modified by Ken Hanson <kmh@lanl.gov> March 16, 2006\n% For title fonts, scale CMR fonts from 12pt, instead of 17pt\n% 3.20 Modified by Ken Hanson <kmh@lanl.gov> April 17, 2007\n% Small format revisions to match SPIE specifications\n% 3.30 Modified by Ken Hanson <kmh@lanl.gov> January 19, 2008\n% Place reference numbers in square brackets to match new SPIE specs \n% 3.40 MOdified by John Hammersley August 14 2015\n% Remove superseded/outdated instructions and tidy up with new packages\n% \n%%\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091196,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31996"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31996"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Ritam Kundu"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Khushboo Dixit, Ritam Kundu, Papia Panda, Soebur Razzaque, Ramita Sarkar"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Quantum Information as a New Lens for Precision Neutrino Physics"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"31 pages, 7 figures, 3 tables. Comments are welcome"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"string","value":"IP/BBSR/2026-09"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"hep-ph hep-ex quant-ph"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"We present a quantum-information-theoretic study of three-flavor neutrino oscillations in long-baseline experiments by mapping flavor states to qubit-like representations and quantifying quantum correlations through total concurrence. The local minima of this entanglement measure identify energy regions where the flavor state is closest to separability, enabling cleaner extraction of oscillation parameters. We explain how these local minima offer opportunities for precision measurements and provide insight into the accurate determination of neutrino oscillation parameters. We then propose a strategy to improve parameter extraction by aligning the benchmark oscillation regions of NO$\\nu$A and T2K with the minimum entanglement achievable in each experiment. This shifts the concurrence minima toward higher-event-count energy regions, leading to tighter constraints and reducing the tension arising from their different energy regimes. For normal ordering, we obtain $(0.581^{+0.0136}_{-0.0150},,195^{+38}_{-32},^\\circ)$ in the $(\\sin^2\\theta_{23},\\delta_{\\rm CP})$ plane and $(0.580^{+0.0140}_{-0.0153},,2.515^{+0.0344}_{-0.0344}\\times10^{-3},\\mathrm{eV}^2)$ in the $(\\sin^2\\theta_{23},\\Delta m^2_{31})$ plane, yielding improved joint constraints. Using GLoBES simulations together with real data, we assess how local minima of quantum correlations influence leptonic CP-violation sensitivity, $\\theta_{23}$ octant-degeneracy resolution, and mass-ordering determination. Our results show that minimizing entanglement can significantly affect these key sensitivities, highlighting quantum information measures as complementary probes of neutrino flavor oscillations and offering new insight into the role of quantum correlations in precision neutrino physics."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:31:47 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:31:47 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Dixit","Khushboo",""],["Kundu","Ritam",""],["Panda","Papia",""],["Razzaque","Soebur",""],["Sarkar","Ramita",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Dixit\",\n \"Khushboo\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Kundu\",\n \"Ritam\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Panda\",\n \"Papia\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Razzaque\",\n \"Soebur\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Sarkar\",\n \"Ramita\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: jheppub.sty\n================================================\n%% jheppub.sty\n%% Copyright 2013 SISSA Medialab\n%\n% This work may be distributed and/or modified under the\n% conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3\n% of this license or (at your option) any later version.\n% The latest version of this license is in\n% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt\n% and version 1.3 or later is part of all distributions of LaTeX\n% version 2005/12/01 or later.\n%\n% This work has the LPPL maintenance status `author-maintained'.\n%\n% The Current Maintainer of this work is\n% SISSA Medialab <info@medialab.sissa.it>\n%\n% This work consists of the file jheppub.sty.\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}\n\\ProvidesPackage{jheppub}[2013/03/21 r534]\n\n\n\\gdef\\@fpheader{Prepared for submission to JHEP}\n\\gdef\\@journal{jhep}\n\n\\newif\\ifnotoc\\notocfalse\n\\newif\\ifemailadd\\emailaddfalse\n\\newif\\iftoccontinuous\\toccontinuousfalse\n\\newif\\ifnatbibsort\\natbibsorttrue\n\n\\DeclareOption{no-natbib-sort}{\\natbibsortfalse}\n\\ProcessOptions\\relax\n\n\\RequirePackage{amsmath}\n\\RequirePackage{amssymb}\n\\RequirePackage{epsfig}\n\\RequirePackage{graphicx}\n\\ifnatbibsort\\RequirePackage[numbers,sort&compress]{natbib}\\else\\RequirePackage[numbers,compress]{natbib}\\fi\n\\RequirePackage{color}\n\\RequirePackage[colorlinks=true\n,urlcolor=blue\n,anchorcolor=blue\n,citecolor=blue\n,filecolor=blue\n,linkcolor=blue\n,menucolor=blue\n,pagecolor=blue\n,linktocpage=true\n,pdfproducer=medialab\n,pdfa=true\n]{hyperref}\n\n\\def\\@subheader{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@keywords{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@abstract{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@xtum{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@dedicated{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@arxivnumber{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@collaboration{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@collaborationImg{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@proceeding{\\@empty}\n\\def\\@preprint{\\@empty}\n\n\\newcommand{\\subheader}[1]{\\gdef\\@subheader{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\keywords}[1]{\\if!\\@keywords!\\gdef\\@keywords{#1}\\else%\n\\PackageWarningNoLine{\\jname}{Keywords already defined.\\MessageBreak Ignoring last definition.}\\fi}\n\\renewcommand{\\abstract}[1]{\\gdef\\@abstract{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\dedicated}[1]{\\gdef\\@dedicated{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\arxivnumber}[1]{\\gdef\\@arxivnumber{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\proceeding}[1]{\\gdef\\@proceeding{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\xtumfont}[1]{\\textsc{#1}}\n\\newcommand{\\correctionref}[3]{\\gdef\\@xtum{\\xtumfont{#1} \\href{#2}{#3}}}\n\\newcommand\\jname{JHEP}\n\\newcommand\\acknowledgments{\\section*{Acknowledgments}}\n\\newcommand\\notoc{\\notoctrue}\n\\newcommand\\preprint[1]{\\gdef\\@preprint{\\hfill #1}}\n\n\n\n%Equivalent to ``\\footnote'', but can be used inside the \\author macro\n% because it does not write the footnote mark\n% it has an optional argument that will be used as footnote mark when given\n% WARNING: when the optional argument is used, the footnotecounter is not increased\n% WARNING: the character ``!'' cannot be used.\n% If you really need it use somthing like [\\relax !] as the optional arg.\n\\newcommand\\note[2][]{%\n\\if!#1!%\n\\stepcounter{footnote}\\footnotetext{#2}%\n\\else%\n{\\renewcommand\\thefootnote{#1}%\n\\footnotetext{#2}}%\n\\fi}\n\n\n\n%Use this if you want to try to keep some piece of the abstract on a\n%very long first page\n\\newcommand\\compress{%\n\\renewcommand\\afterProceedingsSpace{\\bigskip}%\n\\renewcommand\\afterTitleSpace{\\bigskip}%\n\\renewcommand\\afterRuleSpace{\\bigskip\\bigskip}\n\\renewcommand\\afterEmailSpace{\\par\\bigskip}}\n\n%authors and affiliations\n\\newtoks\\auth@toks\n\\renewcommand{\\author}[2][]{%\n \\if!#1!%\n \\auth@toks=\\expandafter{\\the\\auth@toks#2\\ }%\n \\else\n \\auth@toks=\\expandafter{\\the\\auth@toks#2$^{#1}$\\ }%\n \\fi\n}\n\n\\newtoks\\affil@toks\\newif\\ifaffil\\affilfalse\n\\newcommand{\\affiliation}[2][]{%\n\\affiltrue\n \\if!#1!%\n \\affil@toks=\\expandafter{\\the\\affil@toks{\\item[]#2}}%\n \\else\n \\affil@toks=\\expandafter{\\the\\affil@toks{\\item[$^{#1}$]#2}}%\n \\fi\n}\n\n%emails\n%automatically put a comma between emails\n\\newtoks\\email@toks\\newcounter{email@counter}%\n\\setcounter{email@counter}{0}%\n\\newcommand{\\emailAdd}[1]{%\n\\emailaddtrue%\n\\ifnum\\theemail@counter>0\\email@toks=\\expandafter{\\the\\email@toks, \\@email{#1}}%\n\\else\\email@toks=\\expandafter{\\the\\email@toks\\@email{#1}}%\n\\fi\\stepcounter{email@counter}}\n\\newcommand{\\@email}[1]{\\href{mailto:#1}{\\tt #1}}\n\n\n% Collaboration macros\n\\newcommand*\\collaboration[1]{\\gdef\\@collaboration{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\collaborationImg[2][]{\\gdef\\@collaborationImg{#2}}\n\n%all pieces get a ``after'' spacing\n\\newcommand\\afterLogoSpace{\\smallskip}\n\\newcommand\\afterSubheaderSpace{\\vskip3pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterProceedingsSpace{\\vskip21pt plus0.4fil minus15pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterTitleSpace{\\vskip23pt plus0.06fil minus13pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterRuleSpace{\\vskip23pt plus0.06fil minus13pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterCollaborationSpace{\\vskip3pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterCollaborationImgSpace{\\vskip3pt plus 2pt minus 1pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterAuthorSpace{\\vskip5pt plus4pt minus4pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterAffiliationSpace{\\vskip3pt plus3pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterEmailSpace{\\vskip16pt plus9pt minus10pt\\filbreak}\n\\newcommand\\afterXtumSpace{\\par\\bigskip}\n\\newcommand\\afterAbstractSpace{\\vskip16pt plus9pt minus13pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterKeywordsSpace{\\vskip16pt plus9pt minus13pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterArxivSpace{\\vskip3pt plus0.01fil minus10pt}\n\\newcommand\\afterDedicatedSpace{\\vskip0pt plus0.01fil}\n\\newcommand\\afterTocSpace{\\bigskip\\medskip}\n\\newcommand\\afterTocRuleSpace{\\bigskip\\bigskip}\n%this is the ``itemsep'' of the affiliations list\n\\newlength{\\affiliationsSep}\\setlength{\\affiliationsSep}{-3pt}\n%this hook is needed if the toc starts on the first page\n\\newcommand\\beforetochook{\\pagestyle{myplain}\\pagenumbering{roman}}\n\n\\DeclareFixedFont\\trfont{OT1}{phv}{b}{sc}{11}\n\n%first page\n\\renewcommand\\maketitle{\n%% First page\n\\pagestyle{empty}\n\\thispagestyle{titlepage}\n\\setcounter{page}{0}\n\\noindent{\\small\\scshape\\@fpheader}\\@preprint\\par\n\\afterLogoSpace\n% Subheader\n\\if!\\@subheader!\\else\\noindent{\\trfont{\\@subheader}}\\fi\n\\afterSubheaderSpace\n% Proceedings\n\\if!\\@proceeding!\\else\\noindent{\\sc\\@proceeding}\\fi\n\\afterProceedingsSpace\n% Title\n{\\LARGE\\flushleft\\sffamily\\bfseries\\@title\\par}\n\\afterTitleSpace\n% Rule\n\\hrule height 1.5\\p@%\n\\afterRuleSpace\n% Collaboration\n\\if!\\@collaboration!\\else\n{\\Large\\bfseries\\sffamily\\raggedright\\@collaboration}\\par\n\\afterCollaborationSpace\n\\fi\n%\n\\if!\\@collaborationImg!\\else\n{\\normalsize\\bfseries\\sffamily\\raggedright\\@collaborationImg}\\par\n\\afterCollaborationImgSpace\n%% I leave the size and font so that if there are two collaboration\n%% they can be linked with an 'and'\n\\fi\n% Author\n{\\bfseries\\raggedright\\sffamily\\the\\auth@toks\\par}\n\\afterAuthorSpace\n% Affiliation\n\\ifaffil\\begin{list}{}{%\n\\setlength{\\leftmargin}{0.28cm}%\n\\setlength{\\labelsep}{0pt}%\n\\setlength{\\itemsep}{\\affiliationsSep}%\n\\setlength{\\topsep}{-\\parskip}}\n\\itshape\\small%\n\\the\\affil@toks\n\\end{list}\\fi\n\\afterAffiliationSpace\n% E-mail\n\\ifemailadd %% if emailadd is true\n\\noindent\\hspace{0.28cm}\\begin{minipage}[l]{.9\\textwidth}\n\\begin{flushleft}\n\\textit{E-mail:} \\the\\email@toks\n\\end{flushleft}\n\\end{minipage}\n\\else %% if emailaddfalse do nothing\n\\PackageWarningNoLine{\\jname}{E-mails are missing.\\MessageBreak Plese use \\protect\\emailAdd\\space macro to provide e-mails.}\n\\fi\n\\afterEmailSpace\n%Erratum or addendum\n\\if!\\@xtum!\\else\\noindent{\\@xtum}\\afterXtumSpace\\fi\n% Abstract\n\\if!\\@abstract!\\else\\noindent{\\renewcommand\\baselinestretch{.9}\\textsc{Abstract:}}\\ \\@abstract\\afterAbstractSpace\\fi\n% Keywords\n\\if!\\@keywords!\\else\\noindent{\\textsc{Keywords:}} \\@keywords\\afterKeywordsSpace\\fi\n% Arxivnumber\n\\if!\\@arxivnumber!\\else\\noindent{\\textsc{ArXiv ePrint:}} \\href{http://arxiv.org/abs/\\@arxivnumber}{\\@arxivnumber}\\afterArxivSpace\\fi\n% Dedication\n\\if!\\@dedicated!\\else\\vbox{\\small\\it\\raggedleft\\@dedicated}\\afterDedicatedSpace\\fi\n%\n\\ifnotoc\\else\n\\iftoccontinuous\\else\\newpage\\fi\n\\beforetochook\\hrule\n\\tableofcontents\n\\afterTocSpace\n\\hrule\n\\afterTocRuleSpace\n\\fi\n\\setcounter{footnote}{0}\n\\pagestyle{myplain}\\pagenumbering{arabic}\n} % close the \\renewcommand\\maketitle{\n\n\n% Page layout\n\\renewcommand{\\baselinestretch}{1.1}\\normalsize\n\\setlength\\lineskip{1\\p@}\n\\setlength\\parindent{1.2\\parindent}\n\\setlength\\normallineskip{1\\p@}\n\\setlength\\parskip{0\\p@ \\@plus \\p@}\n\\@lowpenalty 51\n\\@medpenalty 151\n\\@highpenalty 301\n\\widowpenalty 1000\n\\clubpenalty 1000\n\n\\setcounter{topnumber}{4}\n\\renewcommand\\topfraction{1}\n\\setcounter{bottomnumber}{1}\n\\renewcommand\\bottomfraction{.6}\n\\setcounter{totalnumber}{5}\n\\renewcommand\\textfraction{0}\n\\renewcommand\\floatpagefraction{1}\n\n\\textwidth .72\\paperwidth\n\\setlength\\@tempdima{.76\\paperheight}\n\\divide\\@tempdima\\baselineskip\n\\@tempcnta=\\@tempdima\n\\setlength\\textheight{\\@tempcnta\\baselineskip}\n\\addtolength\\textheight{\\topskip}\n\n\\voffset -1in\n\\topmargin .05\\paperheight\n\\headheight .02\\paperheight\n\\headsep .03\\paperheight\n\\footskip .07\\paperheight\n\n\\marginparsep 9\\p@\n\\marginparpush 6\\p@\n\n\\hoffset -1in\n\\oddsidemargin .14\\paperwidth\n\\evensidemargin .14\\paperwidth\n\\marginparwidth .11\\paperwidth\n\n\\setlength\\arraycolsep{2\\p@}\n\\setlength\\tabcolsep{6\\p@}\n\\setlength\\arrayrulewidth{.4\\p@}\n\\setlength\\doublerulesep{2\\p@}\n\\setlength\\tabbingsep{\\labelsep}\n\\skip\\@mpfootins = \\skip\\footins\n\\setlength\\fboxsep{3\\p@}\n\\setlength\\fboxrule{.4\\p@}\n\n% No dots in the table of contents\n\\renewcommand{\\@dotsep}{10000}\n\n% Footer and header of the body\n% the command ``\\pagestyle{myplain}'' must be inserted\n% just after ``\\begin{document}''\n\\newcommand\\ps@myplain{\n\\pagenumbering{arabic}\n\\renewcommand\\@oddfoot{\\hfill-- \\thepage\\ --\\hfill}\n\\renewcommand\\@oddhead{}}\n\\let\\ps@plain=\\ps@myplain\n\n\n\n% no header or footer in the title page\n\\newcommand\\ps@titlepage{\\renewcommand\\@oddfoot{}\\renewcommand\\@oddhead{}}\n\n\n\n%number equations after the sections\n\\renewcommand{\\theequation}{\\thesection.\\arabic{equation}}\n\\numberwithin{equation}{section}\n\n\n%headings style\n\\renewcommand\\section{\\@startsection{section}{1}{\\z@}%\n {-3.5ex \\@plus -1.3ex \\@minus -.7ex}%\n {2.3ex \\@plus.4ex \\@minus .4ex}%\n {\\normalfont\\large\\bfseries}}\n\\renewcommand\\subsection{\\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\\z@}%\n {-2.3ex\\@plus -1ex \\@minus -.5ex}%\n {1.2ex \\@plus .3ex \\@minus .3ex}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries}}\n\\renewcommand\\subsubsection{\\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\\z@}%\n {-2.3ex\\@plus -1ex \\@minus -.5ex}%\n {1ex \\@plus .2ex \\@minus .2ex}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries}}\n\\renewcommand\\paragraph{\\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\\z@}%\n {1.75ex \\@plus1ex \\@minus.2ex}%\n {-1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries}}\n\\renewcommand\\subparagraph{\\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\\parindent}%\n {1.75ex \\@plus1ex \\@minus .2ex}%\n {-1em}%\n {\\normalfont\\normalsize\\bfseries}}\n\n\n%Caption of figure and table\n\\def\\fnum@figure{\\textbf{\\figurename\\nobreakspace\\thefigure}}\n\\def\\fnum@table{\\textbf{\\tablename\\nobreakspace\\thetable}}\n\n%redefining \\@makecaption, to have captions with \\small font size\n%taken from article.cls l.489--498\n%the only differences are the ``\\small '' commands added on two lines\n\\long\\def\\@makecaption#1#2{%\n \\vskip\\abovecaptionskip\n \\sbox\\@tempboxa{\\small #1. #2}%\n \\ifdim \\wd\\@tempboxa >\\hsize\n \\small #1. #2\\par\n \\else\n \\global \\@minipagefalse\n \\hb@xt@\\hsize{\\hfil\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n \\fi\n \\vskip\\belowcaptionskip}\n\n\n\n\n\n%apply some formatting on the biblio\n%without redefining the whole env\n\\let\\oldthebibliography=\\thebibliography\n\\let\\endoldthebibliography=\\endthebibliography\n\\renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]{%\n\\begin{oldthebibliography}{#1}%\n\\small%\n\\raggedright%\n\\setlength{\\itemsep}{5pt plus 0.2ex minus 0.05ex}%\n}%\n{%\n\\end{oldthebibliography}%\n}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: main_v1.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}\n\\pdfoutput=1\n\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}\n\\usepackage{jheppub}\n\\usepackage{latexsym}\n\\usepackage{color}\n\\usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames,svgnames,table]{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{tikz}\n\\usepackage{graphicx, braket}\n\\usepackage{epsfig} \n\\usepackage{epsf} \n\\usepackage{float}\n%\\usepackage{lineno}\n\\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}\n\\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}\n%\\linenumbers\n\\usepackage{dcolumn}\n\\usepackage{bm}\n\\usepackage[toc,page]{appendix}\n\\usepackage{dcolumn}\n\\usepackage{textcomp}\n\\usepackage{float}\n\\usepackage{hypcap}\n\\usepackage[]{hyperref}\n\\usepackage{booktabs}\n\\usepackage{multirow}\n\\usepackage{diagbox}\n\\usepackage{alphalph}\n\\usepackage{textcomp}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{epstopdf}\n\\usepackage{orcidlink}\n\\usepackage{url}\n\\DeclareMathOperator{\\diag}{diag}\n\\DeclareMathOperator{\\trace}{Tr}\n\\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}\n\n\\usepackage{lineno}\n\\usepackage{soul} \n\\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}\n\\usepackage{longtable}\n\\usepackage{multirow}\n\\usetikzlibrary{svg.path}\n\n\\definecolor{lime}{HTML}{A6CE39}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand{\\orcidicon}{\\hspace{-2.1mm}\n\\begin{tikzpicture}\n\\draw[lime,fill=lime] (0,0.0) circle [radius=0.13] node[white] {{\\fontfamily{qag}\\selectfont \\tiny ID}}; \\draw[white,fill=white] (-0.0525,0.095) circle [radius=0.007]; \n\\end{tikzpicture} \\hspace{-3.5mm} }\n\\foreach \\x in {A, ..., Z} {\\expandafter\\xdef\\csname orcid\\x\\endcsname{\\noexpand\\href{https://orcid.org/\\csname orcidauthor\\x\\endcsname} {\\noexpand\\orcidicon}}}\n\n\\newcommand{\\orcidauthorA}{0000-0001-7089-8694}\n\\newcommand{\\orcidauthorB}{0000-0003-3258-4357}\n\\newcommand{\\orcidauthorC}{0000-0001-9142-7090}\n\\newcommand{\\orcidauthorD}{0000-0002-0130-2460}\n\\newcommand{\\orcidauthorE}{0000-0002-7538-7372}\n\n\n\\def\\bibsection{\\section*{\\refname}} \n\n\\newcommand{\\capdef}{}\n\\newcommand{\\mycaption}[2][\\capdef]{\\renewcommand{\\capdef}{#2}\n\\caption[#1] {{\\footnotesize #2}}}\n \n \n\\newcommand{\\beq}{\\begin{equation}}\n\\newcommand{\\eeq}{\\end{equation}}\n\\newcommand{\\beqa}{\\begin{eqnarray}}\n\\newcommand{\\eeqa}{\\end{eqnarray}}\n\\definecolor{orcidlogocol}{HTML}{A6CE39}\n\n%%%%%%%%%To remove JHEP submission title%%%%%%\n\\makeatletter\n\\gdef\\@fpheader{}\n\\makeatother\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n%===================\n\\preprint{IP/BBSR/2026-09}\n%===================\n\n\\title{Quantum Information as a New Lens for Precision Neutrino Physics}\n\n\\author[a]{Khushboo Dixit\\,\\orcidA}\n\\author[b,c]{Ritam Kundu\\,\\orcidB}\n\\author[d]{Papia Panda\\,\\orcidC}\n\\author[a,e,f]{Soebur Razzaque\\,\\orcidD}\n\\author[b,c,g]{Ramita Sarkar\\,\\orcidE}\n\n\n\n\\affiliation[a]{Centre for Astro-Particle Physics (CAPP) and Department of Physics, University of Johannesburg, PO Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa}\n\\affiliation[b]{Institute of Physics, Sachivalaya Marg, Sainik School Post, Bhubaneswar 751005, India}\n\\affiliation[c]{Homi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai 400094}\n\\affiliation[d]{School of Physics, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad - 500046, India}\n\\affiliation[e]{Department of Physics, The George Washington University,\nWashington, DC 20052, USA}\n\\affiliation[f]{National Institute for Theoretical and Computational Sciences (NITheCS),\nPrivate Bag X1, Matieland, South Africa}\n\\affiliation[g]{Department of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Ariel University, Ariel 407000, Israel}\n\n\\emailAdd{kdixit@uj.ac.za}\n\\emailAdd{kunduritam14@gmail.com}\n\\emailAdd{ppapia93@gmail.com}\n\\emailAdd{srazzaque@uj.ac.za}\n\\emailAdd{ramitasarkar11@gmail.com}\n\n\n\n\n%========================================================================\n\n\\abstract{We present a quantum-information-theoretic study of three-flavor neutrino oscillations in long-baseline experiments by mapping flavor states to qubit-like representations and quantifying quantum correlations through total concurrence. The local minima of this entanglement measure identify energy regions where the flavor state is closest to separability, enabling cleaner extraction of oscillation parameters. We explain how these local minima offer opportunities for precision measurements and provide insight into the accurate determination of neutrino oscillation parameters. We then propose a strategy to improve parameter extraction by aligning the benchmark oscillation regions of NO$\\nu$A and T2K with the minimum entanglement achievable in each experiment. This shifts the concurrence minima toward higher-event-count energy regions, leading to tighter constraints and reducing the tension arising from their different energy regimes. For normal ordering, we obtain $(0.581^{+0.0136}_{-0.0150},,195^{+38}_{-32},^\\circ)$ in the $(\\sin^2\\theta_{23},\\delta_{\\rm CP})$ plane and $(0.580^{+0.0140}_{-0.0153},,2.515^{+0.0344}_{-0.0344}\\times10^{-3},\\mathrm{eV}^2)$ in the $(\\sin^2\\theta_{23},\\Delta m^2_{31})$ plane, yielding improved joint constraints. Using GLoBES simulations together with real data, we assess how local minima of quantum correlations influence leptonic CP-violation sensitivity, $\\theta_{23}$ octant-degeneracy resolution, and mass-ordering determination. Our results show that minimizing entanglement can significantly affect these key sensitivities, highlighting quantum information measures as complementary probes of neutrino flavor oscillations and offering new insight into the role of quantum correlations in precision neutrino physics.\n}\n\n\n%=========================================================================\n\n\\keywords{Neutrino Physics, Beyond Standard Model, Neutrino Interaction, CP violation}\n\n\n\n\\arxivnumber{XXXX.YYYYY}\n\n%=========================================================================\n\n\\begin{document}\n\\maketitle\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\section{Introduction}\nQuantum information and entanglement studies have emerged as one of the cornerstones driving several frontiers of particle physics over the past few decades. From experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)~\\cite{Barr:2024djo,Zhang:2025mmm,ATLAS:2023fsd} to astroparticle observations~\\cite{Pfenniger:2006rd, Dixit:2019lsg, Balantekin:2022lys, Roggero:2022hpy, Dixit:2024pcj, SinghKoranga:2026kiu, Banerjee:2026jpv} and neutrino phenomenology~\\cite{Dixit:2021jrk, Dixit:2024mbf}, the study of quantum correlations, including entanglement, has demonstrated significant potential, opening new avenues for exploration. The interdisciplinary interface between two rapidly evolving fields - quantum information and neutrino oscillation physics - has now become a topic of considerable interest, even without invoking exotic right-handed neutrinos or extending the Standard Model (SM) with additional symmetries. A key conceptual development in quantum information science is the realization of quantum entanglement within a single particle among its different modes, which has provided a novel framework to understand the nature of entanglement both qualitatively and quantitatively~\\cite{Zanardi:2002pwt, Shi:2003zz}. This framework has been substantiated through experimental observations in single-photon systems~\\cite{PhysRevLett.92.180401, PhysRevLett.88.070402, PhysRevLett.87.050402}. In the context of neutrino physics, the idea of entanglement for a single neutrino distributed among different flavor modes has long been a subject of interest within the community, in the backdrop of two-flavor oscillation \\cite{Blasone:2007vw}. Subsequently, with the establishment of the $3\\nu$ framework through results from experiments such as MINOS+~\\cite{Evans:2017brt, MINOS:2020llm}, NO$\\nu$A~\\cite{NOvA:2007rmc, NOvA:2021nfi}, and T2K~\\cite{T2K:2023smv}, along with the discovery of non-zero $\\theta_{13}$ by Daya Bay reactor neutrino experiment~\\cite{DayaBay:2012fng, DayaBay:2022orm}, quantum correlation studies in the neutrino sector have gained significant momentum~\\cite{Blasone:2007vw, Banerjee:2015mha, Formaggio:2016cuh, Dixit:2018gjc, Ettefaghi:2020otb, Li:2022mus, Alam:2026bxn}.\n%\\cite{Banerjee:2015mha, Dixit:2018gjc, Jha:2020dav, Li:2022mus, Siwach:2022xhx, Alam:2026bxn}.\n\n\n\nThe quantum nature of neutrino oscillations arises from the superpositions of mass eigenstates. When these states are expressed in the flavor basis, they exhibit correlations between different flavor modes. In this notion, we can quantify these correlations through entanglement using well-established measures such as concurrence~\\cite{Zanardi:2002pwt, Schliemann:2001rtw}. These quantities offer an alternative characterization of flavor transition phenomena beyond conventional probability-based analyses. Importantly, entanglement measures depend on the oscillation parameters, including the mixing angles, mass-squared splittings, and the Dirac CP phase, and may therefore help in resolving parameter degeneracies and probing leptonic CP violation~\\cite{Blasone:2007vw, Banerjee:2015mha}. \nMoreover, a three-flavor entanglement structure may also indicate the presence of new physics effects, such as non-standard interactions~\\cite{Dixit:2019swl,Sarkar:2020vob, Konwar:2025ipv}, decoherence~\\cite{Dixit:2018gjc}, or additional sterile degrees of freedom~\\cite{Benatti:2000ph, Fiza:2021gvq}. \n\n\nLong-baseline neutrino experiments are featured by relatively lower uncertainties in the beam flux and improved control over the oscillation length and neutrino energy compared to other neutrino experiments. Hence, even subtle departures from the standard entanglement structure are expected to leave observable imprints on the sensitivities of various outcomes driven by oscillation phenomenology in these unprecedented long-baseline setups. \nMotivated by the significant role of NO$\\nu$A and T2K experiments in shaping the global fits of neutrino oscillation data on behalf of the long-baseline sector, we investigate in this work how concurrence, a measure of quantum entanglement can influence some of the long-standing open issues in the standard $3\\nu$ framework. In our analysis, a single neutrino is treated as a generalized tripartite system comprising three flavor modes ($\\nu_e,\\,\\nu_\\mu,\\,\\text{and}\\,\\,\\nu_\\tau$), which can be mutually entangled. We consider the total concurrence as a measure of quantum entanglement to quantify the degree of entanglement among different flavor modes. It is an important fact to mention that, in our work, we do not consider the interactions between two neutrinos or possible entanglements between them, treating them as individual and independent particles. Following the footprints of the seminal work of the concurrence of an arbitrary state of two qubits~\\cite{Wootters:1997id}, we map the idea of concurrence on the canvas of $3\\nu$ framework. The central theme of this work is to probe the impact of the extremal realizations, specifically the effect of local minima, of this entanglement measure on neutrino oscillation parameters, with particular emphasis on leptonic CP violation, the resolution of the $\\theta_{23}$ octant ambiguity, mass ordering determination, and the enhancement or deterioration of the bounds in reshaping of the allowed parameter space in the $(\\sin^2\\theta_{23} - \\delta_\\mathrm{CP})$ and $(\\sin^2\\theta_{23} - \\Delta m_{31}^2)$ planes. Through this investigation, we aim to understand, within the oscillation canvas and for a single neutrino system, how the limiting scenario of complete separability among flavor modes affects the sensitivities to CP violation, rejection of the incorrect $\\theta_{23}$ octant, and the mass ordering determination, in the backdrop of the current data from the ongoing NO$\\nu$A and T2K experiments.\n\nNO$\\nu$A and T2K are two currently running long-baseline experiments poised to determine the neutrino mass ordering and measure $\\theta_{23}$ and CP-phase ($\\delta_{\\rm CP}$). Results from the two experiments, however, differ significantly on their individual best-fit value of $\\delta_{\\rm CP}$~\\cite{Cherchiglia:2023ojf, Rahaman:2022rfp, Rahaman:2021zzm, Chatterjee:2024kbn, Nizam:2018got, Prakash:2013tta}. In addition to several complementary features, a key distinction between these two experiments lies in their respective energy regimes of operation. Given the strong linear dependence of total concurrence on the neutrino energy through the oscillation probability, our entanglement study is optimized on the mismatching of the energy domain by choosing the common oscillation parameters for both experiments, and hence it is unbiased to a particular global-fit benchmark. \n\nThe structure of this paper is organized as follows: we present the theoretical framework in Section~\\ref{sec:TheoreyFramework}, where we define total concurrence in the context of three-flavor neutrino oscillations. In Section~\\ref{sec:ExperimentalDetails}, we explore the specifics of the experimental scenarios for T2K and NO$\\nu$A, followed by a discussion on how to resolve the tensions between these two experiments from the perspective of total concurrence. Finally, we present our results in Section~\\ref{sec:Results}, followed by discussion and conclusions in Section~\\ref{sec:Discussion}.\n\n\n\n\\label{sec:introducion}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%------------------------------------------- \\\\%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n \n %----------------------------------------------\n\n\n\n\n\n\n%\\newpage\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\section{Theoretical Framework}\n\\label{sec:TheoreyFramework}\nIn this section, we start our discussion by introducing the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) parameterization in the standard three-flavor scenario~\\cite{Maki:1962mu,Pontecorvo:1967fh}. Further, we provide the theoretical framework for constructing the total concurrence, the entanglement measure to quantify the entanglement distributed among its flavor modes, for the three-flavor neutrino oscillation scenario by mapping the neutrino flavor state onto three-qubit states. \n\n\\subsection{$3\\nu$ flavor oscillations}\nNeutrino oscillation is a robust phenomenon in particle physics that gave the first signature of Beyond Standard Model (BSM) physics. This phenomenon confirms the existence of non-zero neutrino mass. The evidence of non-zero $\\theta_{13}$ from the Daya Bay experiment~\\cite{DayaBay:2012fng, DayaBay:2022orm} firmly established the three-flavor neutrino framework. Neutrinos are produced and detected in their flavor states (\\textit{i.e.,} $\\nu_e$, $\\nu_\\mu$, or $\\nu_\\tau$). However, during propagation through vacuum or matter, they evolve as mass eigenstates (\\textit{i.e.,} $\\nu_1$, $\\nu_2$, and $\\nu_3$), which are the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. Neutrino oscillation implies that there is a finite probability that a neutrino is observed in a flavor different from its initial one at the detector, and this probability depends on the baseline length and the neutrino energy. These two sets of states (flavor states and mass eigenstates) are connected by a unitary matrix to conserve the total oscillation probability. This unitary matrix contains three mixing angles: atmospheric mixing angle $\\theta_{23}$, reactor mixing angle $\\theta_{13}$, and solar mixing angle $\\theta_{12}$; and a Dirac CP phase $\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}$, considering neutrino as a Dirac particle. Each of the mass eigenstates can be expressed as a coherent and linear superposition of the flavor states and vice versa. The amount of the superposition of a particular flavor to a given mass eigenstate is governed by the oscillation parameters. Mathematically, it can be written as, \n\\begin{equation}\n\\ket{\\nu_{\\beta}} = \\sum^3_{l=1} U_{\\beta l} \\, \\ket{\\nu_l},\n\\label{eqn:relation_flavor_mass}\n\\end{equation}\nat $t=0$. Here, $\\beta$ and $l$ denote the flavor ($e,\\,\\mu,\\,$ $\\tau$) and mass indices (1, 2, 3), respectively and $U_{\\beta l}$ are the elements of the PMNS matrix,\n\\begin{align}\nU = & \\begin{pmatrix}\nc_{12}c_{13} & s_{12}c_{13} & s_{13}e^{-i\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}} \\\\\n-s_{12}c_{23}-c_{12}s_{23}s_{13}e^{i\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}} & c_{12}c_{23}-s_{12}s_{13}s_{23}e^{i\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}} & c_{13}s_{23} \\\\\ns_{12}s_{23}-c_{12}s_{13}c_{23}e^{i\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}} & -c_{12}s_{23}-s_{12}s_{13}c_{23}e^{i\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}} & c_{13}c_{23}\n\\end{pmatrix}.\n\\label{eqn:PMNS_matrix}\n\\end{align}\\\\\nHere, we take the convention, $c_{ij}=\\cos\\theta_{ij}$ and $s_{ij}=\\sin\\theta_{ij}$ $\\forall$ $i<j=1,2,3$. Following this parameterization, the probability that a neutrino of flavor $\\alpha$ oscillates to a new flavor $\\beta$ after traveling a distance $L$ (km) and having energy $E$ (GeV) can be expressed~\\cite{Giunti:2007ry} as follows, \\\\\n\\begin{align}\nP_{\\alpha \\beta} &= \\delta_{\\alpha \\beta}\n- 4 \\sum_{i>j} \\mathrm{Re}\\!\\left( U_{\\alpha i} U^*_{\\beta i} U^*_{\\alpha j} U_{\\beta j} \\right)\n\\sin^2\\!\\left( 1.27\\, \\frac{\\Delta m^2_{ji} L}{E} \\right) \\nonumber \\\\\n&\\quad \\pm 2 \\sum_{i>j} \\mathrm{Im}\\!\\left( U_{\\alpha i} U^*_{\\beta i} U^*_{\\alpha j} U_{\\beta j} \\right)\n\\sin\\!\\left( 2.54\\, \\frac{\\Delta m^2_{ji} L}{E} \\right).\n\\end{align}\\\\\nThe positive (negative) sign of the third term, \\textit{i.e.,} CP-violating term corresponds to oscillation of neutrino (antineutrino). Here, $\\Delta m^2_{ji}=m^2_j-m^2_i$ (eV$^2$) denotes the solar or atmospheric mass-squared splitting that can be measured experimentally.\nThe governing Hamiltonian $\\mathcal{H}$ in the flavor basis representing the kinetic term of neutrinos and the interaction with the Earth matter can be shown as,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\mathcal{H}= \\frac{1}{2E}\\bigg[U^\\dagger \\begin{pmatrix}\n0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n0 & \\Delta m^2_{21} & 0 \\\\\n0 & 0 & \\Delta m^2_{31}\n\\end{pmatrix} U\\bigg] + \\begin{pmatrix}\nV_{CC} & 0 & 0 \\\\\n0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n0 & 0 & 0\n\\end{pmatrix}.\n\\label{equn:Hamiltonian}\n\\end{equation}\nHere, $U$ stands for the PMNS matrix as mentioned in eq.~\\ref{eqn:PMNS_matrix}, $E$ represents the neutrino energy, $V_{CC}$ depicts the Earth matter potential due to charged current (CC) interaction of neutrinos with the Earth. Here, $V_{CC}= \\pm \\sqrt{2}G_F N_e = \\pm (7.6\\times 10^{-14}\\times Y_e\\times\\rho)$ eV, where $G_F = 1.667\\times10^{-5}\\, \\mathrm{GeV}^{-2}$ is the Fermi coupling constant, $N_e$ stands for the electron number density in the Earth matter, $\\rho$ (in $g/cm^3$) is the line-averaged matter density of the medium, and $Y_e$ is the fractional contribution of electrons of the Earth (generally, upon the assumption of equal contribution of muon and tau in electrically neutral matter; $Y_e=\\frac{N_e}{N_p+N_n}=0.5$ )~\\cite{Wolfenstein:1977ue, Mikheyev:1985zog, Mikheyev1986, Minakata:2015gra, Denton:2016wmg}. The matter potential changes sign to negative for antineutrinos. Eq.~\\ref{equn:Hamiltonian} can be simplified as, \n\\begin{equation}\n \\mathcal{H} = \\frac{\\Delta m_{31}^2}{2 E} \\left[ R_{23} U_{\\delta} M U_{\\delta}^{\\dagger} R_{23}^T \\right],\n\\end{equation}\nwith $U_{\\delta} = \\mathrm{diag}(1,1,e^{i\\delta_{CP}})$ and $M = [R_{13} R_{12},\\mathrm{diag}(0,\\alpha,1),R_{12}^{T} R_{13}^{T}]$, with $\\alpha = \\Delta m^2_{21}/\\Delta m^2_{31}$. After diagonalizing the Hamiltonian $\\mathcal{H}$, we obtain the energy eigenvalues $E_1, E_2$, and $E_3$, along with the corresponding eigenvectors $v_1, v_2$, and $v_3$. The resulting mixing matrix is given by $W=(v_1~~v_2~~v_3)$, and the effective mixing matrix in matter takes the form $\\mathcal{U}=R_{23}U_{\\delta}W$.\n\n\nNeutrino mass-eigenstates are the stationary states, $i.e.,$ eigenstates of the free Hamiltonian (or interacting Hamiltonian in the presence of Earth matter potential). Hence, their time evolution can be represented as a solution to the Schrödinger equation, given as $\\ket{\\nu_l (t)} = e^{-i E_l t} \\ket{\\nu_l (0)}$, with $E_l$ being the energy of neutrinos of $l$-th mass eigenstate. Consequently, the connection between mass eigenstates and the flavor states given in eq.~\\ref{eqn:relation_flavor_mass} will be modified at $T=t$ by the phase factor as follows,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\ket{\\nu_{\\beta} (T=t)} = \\sum^3_{l=1} \\mathcal{U}_{\\beta l}~e^{-iE_lt} \\, \\ket{\\nu_l (T=0)},\n\\label{eqn:flavortomass}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\mathcal{U}_{\\beta l}$'s are the component of the matter-modified mixing matrix $\\mathcal{U}$. The connection between two flavor states at different time points, using eqs.~\\ref{eqn:relation_flavor_mass} and \\ref{eqn:flavortomass}, can be depicted as follows, \n\\begin{align}\n\\ket{\\nu_{\\beta} (t)} \n%&=\\sum^3_{l=1} U_{\\beta l}e^{-iE_lt} \\, \\ket{\\nu_l (0)} \\nonumber \\\\\n&= \\sum^3_{l=1} \\sum_{\\alpha=e,\\mu,\\tau} \\mathcal{U}_{\\beta l}~e^{-iE_lt} ~\\mathcal{U}^*_{\\alpha l} \\, \\ket{\\nu_\\alpha (0)} \\,\\, %\\text{[using Eqn. \\ref{eqn:relation_flavor_mass}]} \n\\nonumber\\\\\n%& = \\sum_\\alpha \\sum^3_{l=1} U_{\\beta l}e^{-iE_lt}U^*_{\\alpha l} \\ket{\\nu_\\alpha (0)} \\nonumber\\\\\n& = \\sum_{\\alpha=e,\\mu,\\tau} \\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\beta\\alpha} \\ket{\\nu_\\alpha (0)},\n\\end{align}\nwhere, $\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\beta\\alpha}= \\sum^3_{l=1} \\mathcal{U}_{\\beta l}~e^{-iE_lt} ~ \\mathcal{U}^*_{\\alpha l}$, denotes the flavor transition amplitude, which is subsequently used to compute the quantum entanglement measure, concurrence.\n\n\n\\subsection{Measure of entanglement}\n\tEntanglement is a key property of composite quantum systems where the state cannot be described as a product of individual subsystems. In neutrino oscillations, the mass eigenstates form an entangled basis in the flavor state representation by means of coherent and linear superposition. In this study, we thoroughly examine the degree of entanglement for a single neutrino flavor state, employing total concurrence as our analytical framework.\n\\\\\n\n\n\tConcurrence, being an important measure of entanglement~\\cite{Hill:1997pfa,Wootters:1997id,nielsen_chuang_2010} is strictly positive for\n\tentangled states and vanishes for all separable states. Thus, \nconcurrence provides a compact entanglement monotone that captures bipartite quantum \ncorrelations, satisfying necessary and sufficient conditions for separability. For a composite system with two sub-systems $M$ and $M^\\prime$ in it, the concurrence associated with a bipartition $M|M^\\prime$ is defined as~\\cite{Hill:1997pfa},\n\t\\begin{equation}\n\t\tC^2_{M| M ^\\prime}=2[1-tr{(\\rho^M)^2}],\n\t\\end{equation}\n\twhere $\\rho^M$ is the reduced density matrix of the sub-system M. Thus, concurrence directly quantifies the loss of purity of a subsystem due to entanglement with the other subsystem. Equivalently, for a two-qubit (AB) state, concurrence can also be written in the form,\n\t\\begin{equation}\n\t\tC^2_{A|B} = 4 ~\\text{det}(\\rho^A).\n\t\\end{equation} \nThe idea of concurrence has also been extended beyond two-qubit systems to quantify \nentanglement in multipartite states. Since multipartite entanglement is not captured \nby a single unique quantity, several generalizations of concurrence have been \nproposed. A common strategy is to construct a global or total concurrence by \ncombining the concurrences associated with different bipartitions or different \ntwo-mode reductions of the multipartite state. In this sense, the total concurrence \nacts as a collective measure of how entanglement is distributed among the subsystems.\nFor a three party system consisting of sub-systems $A$, $B$, and $C$, there are three possible bipartitions: $A|BC$, $B|CA$, and $C|AB$. In this case, we define total entanglement as the sum of entanglement across all bipartitions, specifically in terms of the sum of all one-vs-rest squared concurrences,~\\cite{Wootters:1997id, sarkar2021geometry, dutta2019permutation}\n\\begin{equation}\n C^2_{\\mathrm{tot}} = C^2_{A|BC} + C^2_{B|CA} + C^2_{C|AB}.\n\\end{equation}\nHere, each one-vs-rest squared concurrence, corresponding to one bipartition, say $A|BC$, follows the Coffman-Kundu-Wootters (CKW) monogamy relation~\\cite{Hill:1997pfa, Coffman:1999jd} and can be decomposed into pairwise ($A|B$, $A|C$) concurrence contributions and the residual three-tangle depicting the genuine residual three-party contribution. However, for the single-excitation flavor-mode state relevant to neutrino oscillations, the residual three-tangle vanishes, so the measure captures the distributed pairwise flavor-mode entanglement.\n\n \n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\t\\subsection{Neutrino flavor state in occupation number representation}\n\t\n\tThe evolved neutrino state with flavor $\\beta$ in a coherent superposition of flavor basis can be written as,\n\t\\[\n\t\\ket{\\nu_\\beta(t)} = \\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\beta e}(t)\\ket{\\nu_e} + \\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\beta \\mu}(t)\\ket{\\nu_\\mu} + \\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\beta \\tau}(t)\\ket{\\nu_\\tau}.\n\t\\] \n\tIn the effective two-flavor $(\\nu_e - \\nu_\\mu)$ oscillation scenario, the flavor states can be mapped onto a two-qubit state using the occupation number representation at $t=0$ as,\n\t\\[\n\t\\ket{\\nu_e} = \\ket{1}_e \\otimes \\ket{0}_\\mu \\equiv \\ket{10}_e, \\\\\n\t\\ket{\\nu_\\mu} = \\ket{0}_e \\otimes \\ket{1}_\\mu \\equiv \\ket{01}_\\mu,\n\t\\]\n\twhere, $\\ket{1}_e= \\begin{pmatrix}\n\t\t0\\\\\n\t\t1\n\t\\end{pmatrix}$ and $\\ket{0}_\\mu= \\begin{pmatrix}\n\t\t1\\\\\n\t\t0\n\t\\end{pmatrix}$. $\\ket{1}_\\alpha$ and $\\ket{0}_\\beta$ represent the presence of a neutrino in flavor-mode $\\alpha$ and its absence in flavor-mode $\\beta$, respectively. The time evolution of, say an initial $\\nu_e$ state, in a two-flavor mode system can be expressed as, \n\t\\begin{equation} \\label{two_flavoreq}\n\t\t\\ket{\\nu_e(t)} = \\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{ee}(t) \\ket{10}_e + \\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{e\\mu}(t) \\ket{01}_\\mu.\n\t\\end{equation} \n\tThe probability of detecting $\\nu_e$ flavor state as a disappearance probability $P_d = \\left| \\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{ee} \\right|^2$ and the probability of detecting $\\nu_\\mu$ flavor state as an appearance probability \n\t$P_a = \\left| \\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{e\\mu} \\right|^2$. \n \n\t\nSimilarly, a three-flavor neutrino state can be mapped to a three-qubit state using the following occupation number representation of flavor states at $t=0$,\n\t\\[\n\t\\begin{aligned}\n\t\t\\ket{\\nu_e} &= \\ket{1}_e \\otimes \\ket{0}_\\mu \\otimes \\ket{0}_\\tau \\equiv \\ket{100}_e ,\\\\\n\t\t\\ket{\\nu_\\mu} &= \\ket{0}_e \\otimes \\ket{1}_\\mu \\otimes \\ket{0}_\\tau \\equiv \\ket{010}_\\mu ,\\\\\n\t\t\\ket{\\nu_\\tau} &= \\ket{0}_e \\otimes \\ket{0}_\\mu \\otimes \\ket{1}_\\tau \\equiv \\ket{001}_\\tau .\n\t\\end{aligned}\n\t\\]\n\tHere, $\\ket{1}_e= \\begin{pmatrix}\n\t\t0\\\\\n\t\t1\n\t\\end{pmatrix}$ , $\\ket{0}_\\mu= \\begin{pmatrix}\n\t\t1\\\\\n\t\t0\n\t\\end{pmatrix}$, and $\\ket{0}_\\tau= \\begin{pmatrix}\n\t\t1\\\\\n\t\t0\n\t\\end{pmatrix}$.\n\t\n The time evolution of a three-flavor neutrino state in the computational basis, can be written as,\n\\begin{equation}\n\t\\ket{\\nu_\\beta(t)} = \\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\beta e}(t)\\ket{100}_e + \\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\beta \\mu}(t)\\ket{010}_\\mu + \\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\beta \\tau}(t)\\ket{001}_\\tau,\n\t\\label{eq:three_flavor_state}\n\\end{equation}\\\\ \nwhere, $P_d = \\left|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\beta\\beta}\\right|^2$ and $P_a = \\sum_{\\alpha\\neq \\beta}\\left|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\beta \\alpha}\\right|^2$.\n \nTo quantify the degree of entanglement, we prepare a density matrix $\\rho$, as this measure can be easily quantified using the appropriate density matrix. Since our study is based on the ongoing long-baseline experiments, NO$\\nu$A and T2K, the initial neutrino beam is of muon flavor. Hence, for these long-baseline experiments, the time-evolved flavor state can be expressed by eq.~\\ref{eq:three_flavor_state} with $\\beta=\\mu$.\n\nAs a result, the density matrix for the three-flavor neutrino system can be articulated as $\\rho_\\mu (t) = \\ket{\\nu_\\mu (t)}\\bra{\\nu_\\mu (t)}$, which can be linked with the matter-modified mixing matrix elements as follows, \n\\begin{equation}\n\t\\rho_\\mu (T=t) = \\begin{pmatrix}\n0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n0 & ~~|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu\\tau}|^2 & ~~\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu\\tau}\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}^*_{\\mu\\mu} & 0 & ~~\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu\\tau}\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}^*_{\\mu e} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n0 & ~~\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu\\mu}\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}^*_{\\mu\\tau} & ~~|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu\\mu}|^2 & 0 & ~~\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu\\mu}\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}^*_{\\mu e} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n0 & ~~\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu e}\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}^*_{\\mu\\tau} & ~~\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu e}\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}^*_{\\mu\\mu} & 0 & ~~|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu e}|^2 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n\\end{pmatrix}.\n\t\\label{eq:density_matrix}\n\\end{equation} \n\n\n\n \n %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\t\\subsection{Total concurrence for neutrino flavor state}\t\n\tThe post measurement vectors for the two-flavor neutrino state defined in eq.~\\ref{two_flavoreq} are ${\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}}_{ee}\\ket{1}$ and ${\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}}_{e \\mu} \\ket{0}$, which form an orthogonal set of states. %These two vectors are perpendicular; they form a rectangle. \n Concurrence in this case can be defined as $ 2|{\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}}_{ee}||{\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}}_{e \\mu}|$ and hence we get the squared concurrence as $4 P_a P_d$.\n \n \t\n\t\n\tFor three-flavor oscillations, we have concurrence for the bipartitions $C_{\\mu|e \\tau}$, $C_{e|\\mu \\tau}$ and $C_{\\tau| \\mu e}$. The values of these bipartitions~\\cite{nielsen_chuang_2010} for initial $\\nu_\\mu$ state can be given as follows, \n\\begin{align}\nC_{\\mu|e\\tau}\n&=\n\\sqrt{\n2\\left[\n1-\n\\left(|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu e}(t)|^2+|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu\\tau}(t)|^2\\right)^2\n-\n|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu\\mu}(t)|^4\n\\right]\n}\n=\n2|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu\\mu}(t)|\n\\sqrt{1-|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu\\mu}(t)|^2},\n\\nonumber\\\\[2mm]\nC_{e|\\mu\\tau}\n&=\n\\sqrt{\n2\\left[\n1-\n\\left(|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu\\mu}(t)|^2+|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu\\tau}(t)|^2\\right)^2\n-\n|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu e}(t)|^4\n\\right]\n}\n=\n2|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu e}(t)|\n\\sqrt{1-|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu e}(t)|^2},\n\\nonumber\\\\[2mm]\nC_{\\tau|\\mu e}\n&=\n\\sqrt{\n2\\left[\n1-\n\\left(|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu e}(t)|^2+|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu\\mu}(t)|^2\\right)^2\n-\n|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu\\tau}(t)|^4\n\\right]\n}\n=\n2|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu\\tau}(t)|\n\\sqrt{1-|\\widetilde{\\mathcal{U}}_{\\mu\\tau}(t)|^2}.\n\\end{align}\n \nAs in the beam experiments, $\\nu_\\mu$ is mainly the initial flavor, we can project the general equation of total concurrence to the canvas of the three-flavor neutrino landscape. Using proper PMNS matrix elements, the modified definition of squared total concurrence can be expressed as\\\\\n\\begin{equation}\n C^{\\mu^2} = 4 P_{\\mu e}P_{\\mu\\mu} + 4 P_{\\mu \\tau}P_{\\mu\\mu} + 4 P_{\\mu e}P_{\\mu\\tau}.\n \\label{eq: Total_squared_concurrence_in_three_neutrino}\n\\end{equation}\n\n\n %--------------------------------------------------\n %--------------------------------------------------\n\n\n%\\newpage\n \\section{Experimental setups and variation of total concurrence}\n \\label{sec:ExperimentalDetails}\n\nLong-baseline neutrino experiments play a central role in addressing some of the most fascinating questions in neutrino physics~\\cite{Feldman:2012jdx, Agarwalla:2014fva, Rahaman:2022rfp, Diwan:2016gmz}. By sending intense and carefully tuned neutrino beams over distances of hundreds to thousands of kilometers, these experiments allow us to observe how neutrinos transform as they travel through matter. This setup provides a powerful means to explore key issues such as leptonic CP violation~\\cite{Pascoli:2006ci, T2K:2019bcf, Rahaman:2022rfp, Agarwalla:2013avs, Ghosh:2013yon}, resolving the $\\theta_{23}$ octant degeneracy~\\cite{Agarwalla:2013ju, Agarwalla:2021bzs, Ghosh:2015ena}, establishment of the correct neutrino mass ordering~\\cite{Dixit:2018kev, Petcov:2005rv, Agarwalla:2013qfa, Prakash:2013nra, Dutta:2012et}, and matter effects~\\cite{Wolfenstein:1977ue, Mikheyev:1985zog, Mikheyev1986, Minakata:2015gra, Denton:2016wmg} in oscillations. Moreover, they offer an important avenue for probing possible physics beyond the Standard Model~\\cite{Mena:2005ek, Feldman:2012jdx, Agarwalla:2014fva, Diwan:2016gmz, Farzan:2017xzy}. We commence our analysis with some comprehensive juxtaposition of the two well-established long-baseline experiments presently in operation, NO$\\nu$A and T2K, highlighting their defining attributes and experimental sensitivities. First, we compute the total concurrence for neutrinos produced with an initial muon flavor using the NO$\\nu$A and T2K experimental setups, and vary the oscillation parameters to obtain a common set of parameters for which the total concurrence is minimum for both experiments. Thereafter, with the aid of publicly available GLoBES~\\cite{Huber:2004ka,Huber:2007ji} software, we vary selected parameters to fit NO$\\nu$A and T2K data~\\cite{Mikola:2024jnj,Wolcott:2024} while keeping other parameters to their values obtained from the total concurrence.\n\n\n\\subsection{An overview of the experimental setups of NO$\\nu$A and T2K}\n\\label{setup-nova-t2k}\nNuMI Off-axis $\\nu_e$ Appearance (NO$\\nu$A)~\\cite{NOvA:2007rmc, NOvA:2021nfi}, is an ongoing USA-based long-baseline experiment with a baseline of 810 km, spanning from Fermilab to Ash River, Minnesota. This on-axis and narrow band experiment uses a 14 kt scintillator detector with nominal exposure of 58.8 kt$\\cdot$MW$\\cdot$yr and has been collecting data since 2014. The total 6-year run time is equally split between neutrino and antineutrino modes. The experiment typically runs with a beam power of about 700 kW, accumulating approximately $3.6 \\times 10^{21}$ protons on target (P.O.T). Due to its $0.8^\\circ$ off-axis orientation, the maximum flux is at 2 GeV, which is near its first oscillation maxima at 1.6 GeV. As signals, we consider the combined contributions of $\\nu_\\mu \\rightarrow \\nu_e$ together with $\\bar{\\nu}_\\mu \\rightarrow \\bar{\\nu}_e$ for the appearance channels, and $\\nu_\\mu \\rightarrow \\nu_\\mu$ along with $\\bar{\\nu}_\\mu \\rightarrow \\bar{\\nu}_\\mu$ for the disappearance channels. The systematic uncertainties of $5\\%$ in signals and $10\\%$ in backgrounds are considered for both the appearance and disappearance channels' events.\n\nTokai to Kamioka (T2K)~\\cite{T2K:2023smv} is another ongoing narrow-band experiment in Japan, in which an intense $\\nu_\\mu$ beam produced at the J-PARC accelerator facility in Tokai traverses a distance of 295 km to reach the water Cherenkov detector Super-Kamiokande, with a fiducial volume of 22.5 kt. The experiment operates with a beam power of about 750 kW, corresponding to a total exposure of $7.8 \\times 10^{21}$ protons on target, and has been collecting data since 2009. The total runtime of five years is equally divided between neutrino and antineutrino modes, leading to a nominal exposure of 84.4 kt$\\cdot$MW$\\cdot$yr. The $2.5^\\circ$ off-axis configuration helps it to peak its flux at its first oscillation maxima at 0.6 GeV. The budget of systematic uncertainties for T2K is the same as mentioned for NO$\\nu$A.\n\nIt is worth noting that the far detectors of both experiments are non-magnetized and therefore lack the capability to distinguish between neutrino and antineutrino interactions on an event-by-event basis. As a consequence, any wrong-sign contamination present in a given beam configuration, whether nominally neutrino or antineutrino, cannot be directly identified in the detector. Accordingly, in our analysis, we include the wrong-sign contributions as part of the signal. The average Earth matter density for both experiments is considered as 2.8 $gm/cm^3$.\nRecently, NO$\\nu$A and T2K presented their joint analysis~\\cite{T2K:2025wet}, and in our synergistic study of these two experiments, we employ the benchmark oscillation parameter values provided by the collaborations.\n%----------------------------------------\n\\begin{table}[htb!]\n\\centering\n\t\\caption{The benchmark values of the oscillation parameters and their corresponding 3$\\sigma$ ranges following the ref.~\\cite{Esteban:2024eli}.}\n\\resizebox{\\columnwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\n\\hline \\hline\n\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Parameter}} & $\\Delta m^2_{21}/10^{-5}$ & $\\theta_{12}$ & $\\theta_{13}$ & $\\theta_{23}$ & $\\Delta m^2_{31}/10^{-3}$ & $\\delta_{\\text{CP}}$ \\\\\n\t\t\t\t&($\\mathrm{eV^{2}}$) & $(^\\circ)$ & $(^\\circ)$ & &($\\mathrm{eV^{2}}$)& ($^\\circ$)\\\\\n\t\t\t\t\\hline \\hline\n\t\t\t\t\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{NMO}} & \\boldmath$7.49$ & \\boldmath$33.68$ & \\boldmath$8.56$ & \\boldmath$43.3$ & \\boldmath$2.513$ & \\boldmath$212$\\\\\n\t\t\t\t\\cline{2-7}\n\t\t\t\t& 6.92 - 8.05 & 31.63 - 35.95 & 8.19 - 8.89 & 41.3 - 49.9 & 2.451 - 2.578 & 124 - 364\\\\\n\t\t\t\t\\hline \\hline\n \\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{IMO}} & \\boldmath$7.49$ & \\boldmath$33.68$ & \\boldmath$8.59$ & \\boldmath$47.9$ & \\boldmath$-2.484$ & \\boldmath$274$\\\\\n\t\t\t\t\\cline{2-7}\n\t\t\t\t& 6.92 - 8.05 & 31.63 - 35.95 & 8.25 - 8.93 & 41.5 - 49.8 & (-2.547)- (-2.421) & 201 - 335\\\\\n\t\t\t\t\\hline \\hline\n\t\t\t\\end{tabular}\n\t\t\t}\n\t\t\t\\label{table:NuFit}\n\t\\end{table}\n\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\subsection{Common benchmark oscillation parameter sets between NO$\\nu$A and T2K }\nNO$\\nu$A and T2K are two forefront long-baseline experiments that operate in different energy regimes and probe distinct first oscillation maxima. Being off-axis experiments, their fluxes peak at different energies due to differences in their respective off-axis angles relative to the beam pipes. Consequently, their sensitivities to total concurrence can differ, reflecting the underlying differences in their energy coverage.\nTo scan the effect of entanglement measure on the sensitivity to oscillation parameters, we need to focus on the dependence of the total concurrence directly on the oscillation parameters, however, being minimally affected by the difference of their operational energy ranges. To achieve this, we calculate the total concurrence within the energy range corresponding to the full width at half maxima (FWHM) around their \npeak flux, varying the oscillation parameters within their $3\\sigma$ uncertainties reported in~\\cite{Esteban:2024eli} and listed in table~\\ref{table:NuFit}.\nFurther, among these values, we selected a common set of six neutrino oscillation parameters that yielded the minimum total concurrence achieved for the T2K and NO$\\nu$A experiments. These parameter values are detailed in table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined} and table~\\ref{tab:IMO_concurrence_combined}, in case of normal mass ordering (NMO) and inverted mass ordering (IMO), respectively. The minimum value of total concurrence, particularly its local minima, is significant for the clear extraction of oscillation parameters. This is because these minima correspond to the energy window where the neutrino flavor state is closest to being separable. In the context of another long-baseline neutrino experiment under construction, known as Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE)~\\cite{DUNE:2020jqi}, it has been reported that this local minima of total concurrence indicate a nearly separable (though not fully separable) neutrino flavor state~\\cite{Banerjee:2024lih}. This characteristic makes it especially suitable for the precise extraction of oscillation parameters. \n\nWe found two common oscillation parameter sets (set-1 and set-2) corresponding to the concurrence local minima for T2K and NO$\\nu$A in the case of NMO, while only one such set in case of IMO. These parameters serve as our benchmark choices, significantly reducing the impact of the discrepancies between the operational energy windows of NO$\\nu$A and T2K.\nSuch a prescription of choosing this common set of oscillation parameters also ensures that our results are less biased toward a particular global-fit preference.\\\\\n% ========== Table 2 ============\n\\begin{table}[htbp]\n\\centering\n\\caption{Common sets of oscillation parameters between T2K and NO$\\nu$A corresponding to minimum total concurrence within the allowed $3\\sigma$ ranges of the global fit~\\cite{Esteban:2024eli}, and within their respective energy ranges containing FWHM of flux, assuming NMO.}\n\n\\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\n\\hline\\hline\n\\textbf{Type} & \\textbf{Set} & \\textbf{Experiment} & $\\Delta m^2_{21}/(10^{-5})$ & $\\theta_{12}$ & $\\theta_{13}$ & $\\theta_{23}$ & $\\Delta m^2_{31}/(10^{-3})$ & $\\delta_{CP}$ & \\textbf{Total concurrence} \\\\\n\\textbf{of extrema} & & \\textbf{[E (GeV)]} & \\textbf{[eV$^2$]} & & & & \\textbf{[eV$^2$]} & & \\textbf{(NMO)}\\\\\n\\hline\n\n\\multirow{4}{*}{\\textbf{Min}} \n& Set-1 & NO$\\nu$A [1.73] \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{8.05} \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{35.9} \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{8.19} \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{45.0} \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{2.574} \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{88} \n& 0.165057 \\\\\n\\cline{10-10}\n& & T2K [0.62] \n& & & & & & & 0.131989 \\\\\n\\cline{2-10}\n\n& Set-2 & NO$\\nu$A [2.01] \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{6.93} \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{35.9} \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{8.19} \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{45.0} \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{2.574} \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{92} \n& 0.40973 \\\\\n\\cline{10-10}\n& & T2K [0.685, 0.75] \n& & & & & & & 0.260415 (0.447701) \\\\\n\n\\hline\n\n\n\n\\hline\\hline\n\\end{tabular}\n}\n\\label{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined}\n\\end{table} \n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\begin{table}[htbp]\n\\centering\n\\caption{Common oscillation parameters between T2K and NO$\\nu$A corresponding to minimum total concurrence within the allowed $3\\sigma$ ranges of the global fit~\\cite{Esteban:2024eli}, and within their respective energy ranges containing FWHM of flux, assuming IMO.}\n\n\\resizebox{\\textwidth}{!}{%\n\\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\n\\hline\\hline\n\\textbf{Type} & \\textbf{Experiment} & $\\Delta m^2_{21}/(10^{-5})$ & $\\theta_{12}$ & $\\theta_{13}$ & $\\theta_{23}$ & $\\Delta m^2_{31}/(10^{-3})$ & $\\delta_{CP}$ & \\textbf{Total concurrence} \\\\\n\\textbf{of extrema} & \\textbf{[E (GeV)]} & \\textbf{[eV$^2$]} & & & & \\textbf{[eV$^2$]} & & \\textbf{(IMO)} \\\\\n\\hline\n\n% -------- MIN --------\n\\multirow{2}{*}{\\textbf{Min}}\n& NO$\\nu$A [1.93--2.03] \n& \\multirow{2}{*}{8.05}\n& \\multirow{2}{*}{35.9}\n& \\multirow{2}{*}{8.25}\n& \\multirow{2}{*}{45.0}\n& \\multirow{2}{*}{-2.547}\n& \\multirow{2}{*}{88}\n& 0.216--0.319 \\\\\n\\cline{9-9}\n& T2K [0.62] \n& & & & & & & 0.0998 \\\\\n\n\\hline\n\n\\hline\\hline\n\\end{tabular}\n}\n\\label{tab:IMO_concurrence_combined}\n\\end{table}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\begin{figure}[H]\n\t\\centering \n \\includegraphics[width=0.95\\linewidth]{./Fig/v1_New2_test}\\\\ \n\t\\includegraphics[width=0.95\\linewidth]{./Fig/Combined_NOVA_T2K_Plots_Matched}\n \n\\caption{(a) [(b)] the common oscillation parameters corresponding to minimum concurrence, set-1 [set-2] of Table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined}, \n%(b) the common oscillation parameters corresponding to minimum concurrence, Set-2 of Table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined},\n(c) the benchmark choices given by NO$\\nu$A and T2K, individually~\\cite{T2K:2025wet}, and (d) the benchmark values given by the joint analysis of NO$\\nu$A and T2K~\\cite{T2K:2025wet}, assuming NMO. The solid lines depict total concurrence ($C^{\\mu^2}$), whereas the dashed lines represent the normalized Quantum Fisher Information (QFI) ($H_Q(\\alpha)$ for $\\alpha=\\delta_{CP}$)~\\cite{Nogueira:2016qsk} for T2K (red) and NO$\\nu$A (blue) as a function of neutrino energy. The red (blue) vertical dotted lines indicate the neutrino energies corresponding to the local minimum of the total concurrence for T2K (NO$\\nu$A), while the olive dotted lines denote the energies at which the QFI is maximum. For T2K, the concurrence minimum and QFI maximum coincide, resulting in a single vertical line.} \n\t\\label{fig:2_conc_vs_energy}\n\\end{figure}\nFigure~\\ref{fig:2_conc_vs_energy} portrays the behavior of the total concurrence as a function of neutrino energy for NO$\\nu$A and T2K. For the upper panel of figure~\\ref{fig:2_conc_vs_energy}, the benchmark oscillation parameters are taken from table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined}. The left column corresponds to set-1, while the right column corresponds to set-2, both for the case of NMO. We also present the variation in total concurrence with energy for the best-fit oscillation parameter values reported in~\\cite{T2K:2025wet} by the T2K and NO$\\nu$A collaborations, individually (left) and from their combined fit (right) in the lower panel of figure~\\ref{fig:2_conc_vs_energy}. \nThe blue and red solid lines represent total concurrence ($C^{\\mu^2}$), given in eq.~\\ref{eq: Total_squared_concurrence_in_three_neutrino}, for the NO$\\nu$A and T2K experiments, respectively. In each panel, the blue (NO$\\nu$A) and red (T2K) shaded regions illustrate the corresponding experimental flux measurements.\n \n\nIn the upper panels of figure~\\ref{fig:2_conc_vs_energy}, we observe that the concurrence local minima for T2K occur at nearly the same energy level, approximately 0.599 GeV for set-1 (left panel) and around 0.60 GeV for set-2 (right panel). In contrast, the concurrence local minima for NO$\\nu$A are shifted to energy values that align with its FWHM region of the maximum neutrino flux, specifically around 1.647 GeV for set-1 and 1.65 GeV for set-2. These energy values are closer to the peak flux energy for NO$\\nu$A at 2 GeV compared to the local concurrence minima observed in the lower panel, which are at approximately 1.58 GeV and 1.61 GeV. As a result, selecting a set of common oscillation parameters for T2K and NO$\\nu$A based on the minimum concurrence achieved by both experiments effectively shifts the local minima of total concurrence for each experiment to an energy range within FWHM of their respective fluxes, where most of the neutrino events are detected, thus increasing statistical significance. We checked that a similar conclusion can be drawn for IMO by adopting the common set of oscillation parameters for the NO$\\nu$A and T2K configurations, as listed in table~\\ref{tab:IMO_concurrence_combined}. \n \nWe refer to this strategy of total concurrence local-minima-shift (LMS) within the FWHM regions for each experiment, the LMS scheme. This scheme enhances the likelihood of accurately extracting the oscillation parameters. In the next section, we use the benchmark values of oscillation parameters given in table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined} (for NMO) and table~\\ref{tab:IMO_concurrence_combined} (for IMO) to present our results regarding the oscillation parameter estimation. \n\n\\subsection{Relationship between total concurrence and quantum Fisher information}\nIn the previous subsection, we discussed the significance of local minima in total concurrence for the accurate extraction of oscillation parameters. These local minima represent nearly separable (but not fully) neutrino flavor states, which aid in the extraction of oscillation parameters. \nThis local minima of total concurrence also coincides quite close to the maximum value of quantum Fisher information (QFI), an important aspect related to quantum metrology. It strongly supports why the local minima of total concurrence helps in clear parameter extraction.\nQFI quantifies the maximum information that a quantum state contains about an unknown parameter. For a neutrino state $\\rho (\\alpha)$ depending on an oscillation parameter $\\alpha$, the QFI, $H_Q(\\alpha)$ determines the ultimate precision allowed by a quantum mechanical state through the quantum Cramér–Rao bound\n\\begin{equation}\n \\Delta \\alpha \\geq \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{N H_Q(\\alpha)}}\n \\label{eq:QFI_bound},\n\\end{equation}\nwith N denoting the number of independent measurements (event counts for neutrinos) and $H_{Q}(\\alpha)$ is expressed as \n\\begin{equation}\n H_{Q}(\\alpha) = 4\\left(\n\\langle \\partial_\\alpha \\psi_\\alpha | \\partial_\\alpha \\psi_\\alpha \\rangle\n-\n\\left|\\langle \\psi_\\alpha | \\partial_\\alpha \\psi_\\alpha \\rangle\\right|^2\n\\right).\n\\label{eq:QFI}\n\\end{equation} \nHence, regions of maximum QFI correspond to regions where small variations in the oscillation parameter produce more distinguishable quantum states, leading to a smaller achievable uncertainty. In neutrino oscillations, QFI therefore provides a measure of the intrinsic parameter sensitivity of the state undergoing flavor oscillations. In figure~\\ref{fig:2_conc_vs_energy}, we have plotted $H_{Q}(\\alpha)$ for $\\alpha=\\delta_{CP}$ as dotted blue and red curves for NO$\\nu$A and T2K, respectively. We observed that there is a relation between local-minima of $C^{\\mu^2}$ defined in eq. \\ref{eq: Total_squared_concurrence_in_three_neutrino} and maxima of $H_{Q}(\\alpha)$ that they coincide quite closely with each other. A similar connection has been reported between the von Neumann entropy-based entanglement measure and the QFI in~\\cite{Nogueira:2016qsk}. In figure~\\ref{fig:2_conc_vs_energy} it can be seen that the $H_{Q}(\\alpha)$ maxima (at $E=1.49$ GeV for the benchmarks from NuFIT 6.0 ) also shifts (at $E=1.536$ GeV for set-1 and at $E=1.54$ GeV for set-2 of table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined}) with $C^{\\mu^2}$ local-minima closer to energy value of peak flux for NO$\\nu$A, while for T2K there is no significant shift as its peak flux already aligns very close to the $C^{\\mu^2}$ local-minima or $H_{Q}(\\alpha)$ maxima.\n\n\n\nThis supports the argument of clear oscillation parameter extraction around local minima of $C^{\\mu^2}$. The total concurrence encodes the entanglement generated among the three flavor modes during oscillation. Its local minima mark regions where the flavor-state structure changes most sharply with respect to the oscillation parameters. When these concurrence minima are shifted toward the high-statistics region of an experiment, the corresponding enhancement of $H_{Q}(\\alpha)$ occurs in an energy range where the event sample is also large. The improved precision, therefore, will arise from the combined effects of intrinsic quantum sensitivity, measured by $H_Q(\\alpha)$, and experimental statistical weight, provided by the flux-dominated region. Thus, the concurrence-based LMS shifting scheme is effective because it aligns the quantum-information-optimal region with the experimentally most favorable energy window.\n\nIt can be seen that the alignment between $C^{\\mu^2}$ local-minima and $H_Q(\\alpha)$ maxima is a bit off for NO$\\nu$A, which occurs due to the profound matter effect for this experiment. However, the LMS scheme shifts both $C^{\\mu^2}$ local-minima and the $H_Q(\\alpha)$ maxima closer to the peak flux energy. \n\n\n\\subsection{Construction of the $\\chi^2$ }\nThe sensitivity is quantified using the Poisson likelihood-based $\\chi^2$ function~\\cite{Baker:1983tu}, from which we extract the median sensitivity~\\cite{Cowan:2010js} within a frequentist framework~\\cite{Blennow:2013oma}. We define our $\\chi^2$ in the following fashion.\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n\\chi^2 (\\vec{\\omega}, \\kappa_{s}, \\kappa_{b,l}) =\n\\underset{(\\vec{\\lambda}, \\kappa_{s}, \\kappa_{b,l})}{\\mathrm{min}}\n\\left[\n2\\sum_{i=1}^{n}\n\\left(\n\\tilde{y}_i - x_i - x_i \\ln \\frac{\\tilde{y}_i}{x_i}\n\\right)\n+ \\kappa_s^2 + \\sum_{l}\\kappa_{b,l}^2\n\\right],\n\\label{eq:chi2}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere the summation extends over $n$ reconstructed energy bins. The minimization is carried out over the nuisance parameters ($\\kappa_s$ and $\\kappa_{b,l}$) and the set $\\vec{\\lambda}$ of oscillation parameters included in the marginalization; the specific choice of $\\vec{\\lambda}$ will be specified in the relevant sections.\n%\nThe expected number of events in the $i$-th bin is written as\n\\begin{equation}\n\\tilde{y}_i(\\vec{\\omega}, \\kappa_{s}, \\kappa_{b,l}) =\nN^{\\mathrm{th}}_i(\\vec{\\omega}) \\left(1 + \\pi^s \\kappa_s \\right)\n+ \\sum_{l} N^b_{i,l}(\\vec{\\omega}) \\left(1 + \\pi^b \\kappa_{b,l} \\right),\n\\label{eq:chi}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhere $N^{\\mathrm{th}}_i(\\vec{\\omega})$ denotes the predicted signal yield for oscillation parameters\n$\\vec{\\omega} = \\{\\theta_{23}, \\theta_{13}, \\theta_{12},\\\\ \\Delta m^2_{21}, \\Delta m^2_{31}, \\delta_{\\mathrm{CP}}\\}$.\nThe term $N^b_{i,l}(\\vec{\\omega})$ represents the contribution from the $l$-th background component. While neutral-current backgrounds are independent of the oscillation parameters, charged-current backgrounds inherit a dependence on $\\vec{\\omega}$. The coefficients $\\pi^s$ and $\\pi^b$ encode the relative systematic uncertainties on the signal and background components, respectively, with $\\kappa_s$ and $\\kappa_{b,l}$ being the corresponding pull parameters. All systematics are treated as uncorrelated, and identical values are assumed for neutrino and antineutrino running modes. \n\nThe binned data entering the likelihood are constructed as $x_i = N^{\\mathrm{ex}}_i + N^b_{i,l}$, where $N^{\\mathrm{ex}}_i$ denotes the observed charged-current signal events in the $i$-th bin. These include contributions from both disappearance channels ($\\nu_\\mu \\to \\nu_\\mu$, $\\bar{\\nu}_\\mu \\to \\bar{\\nu}_\\mu$) and appearance channels ($\\nu_\\mu \\to \\nu_e$, $\\bar{\\nu}_\\mu \\to \\bar{\\nu}_e$), while $N^b_{i,l}$ accounts for the associated background contributions.\n\nOur numerical analysis is performed using the \\texttt{GLoBES} framework~\\cite{Huber:2002mx, Fogli:2002pt, Gonzalez-Garcia:2004pka}. In generating the pseudo-data, we assume NMO, consistent with the current global analyses that exhibit a preference for NMO at the level of about $2.5\\sigma$~\\cite{Esteban:2024eli}. During the fit, all relevant oscillation parameters are varied within their $3\\sigma$ ranges, as summarized in table~\\ref{table:NuFit}.\n %--------------------------------------------------\n %--------------------------------------------------\n %-------------------------------------------------- \n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%\\newpage\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%\\newpage\n\\section{Results}\n\\label{sec:Results}\nWe present our results in the context of oscillation parameter estimation, with a primary focus on the $CP$-phase $\\delta_{CP}$, the mixing angle $\\theta_{23}$, and the mass-squared difference $\\Delta m_{31}^2$. Additionally, we provide results showing how our LMS scheme affects the sensitivity of both experiments to detecting $CP$ violation, resolving the $\\theta_{23}$ octant, and determining the mass ordering. Our analysis considers the total contributions from neutrino and antineutrino events.\n\n\\subsection{Influence of LMS scheme on allowed region in ($\\sin^2\\theta_{23}-\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}$) plane} \n\n\\begin{figure}[htb!]\n\t\\centering \n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{./Fig/v1_Combined_Contour_1+2_sigma_conc_Real_data_T2K_NOVA}\n\t\\caption{\\footnotesize{These plots show the bounds in ($\\sin^2\\theta_{23}-\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}$) plane given by NO$\\nu$A (left panel), T2K (middle panel), and NO$\\nu$A+T2K (right panel). The contours are at $1\\sigma$ C.L. for 2 d.o.f. Assuming a true NMO, the blue (upper row) and green (lower row) lines depict contours where the remaining oscillation parameters are fixed to the shared T2K and NO$\\nu$A test values listed in table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined} for set-1 and set-2, respectively. The lower triangular solid points represent the values of $(\\sin^2\\theta_{23},\\delta_{\\mathrm{CP}})$ for which $\\Delta\\chi^2$ is zero. The solid black lines are $1\\sigma$ C.L. contours taken from the recent NO$\\nu$A data~\\cite{NOvA:2021nfi} (for left panel), recent T2K data~\\cite{T2K:2023smv} (for middle panel) and recent joint result of T2K and NO$\\nu$A~\\cite{T2K:2025wet} (for right panel) respectively. The black solid dots represent the best-fit values as given by the collaborations~\\cite{T2K:2025wet}. \n } }\n\t\\label{fig:Contour_min_concurrence_NMO}\n\\end{figure}\n\nIn this section, we investigate the effect of LMS scheme on the phenomenological perspective of possible correlations between $\\sin^2\\theta_{23}$ and $\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}$ in NO$\\nu$A and T2K. To ensure the same footing of NO$\\nu$A and T2K (as discussed earlier), our hypothesis is kept fixed at the set of common oscillation parameters corresponding to the local minima of total concurrence [see table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined}]. We utilize the real data obtained by the collaborations as true data points. In figure~\\ref{fig:Contour_min_concurrence_NMO}, we scan the parameter space ($\\sin^2\\theta_{23}-\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}$) as these are the two most uncertain parameters in the neutrino oscillation sector. This analysis includes results for NO$\\nu$A (left panel), T2K (middle panel), and a combined fit for NO$\\nu$A+T2K (right panel). To obtain this figure, our $\\Delta\\chi^2$ is defined as\n%-------------------------\n\\begin{equation}\n \\begin{aligned}\n \\Delta \\chi^2 = \\underset{(\\kappa_s,\\,\\kappa_b,\\,\\Delta m^2_{31})}{\\mathrm{min}} \\bigg[\n \\chi^2\\big(\\sin^2\\theta_{23}^{\\mathrm{test}} \\in [0.4:0.6],\\, \\delta_{\\mathrm{CP}}^{\\mathrm{test}} \\in [0^\\circ:\\,360^\\circ]\\big) \\\\\n {}- \\chi^2\\big(\\sin^2\\theta_{23}^{\\mathrm{true}},\\,\\delta_{\\mathrm{CP}}^{\\mathrm{true}} \\in \\mathrm{Real\\,\\, Data}\\big)\\bigg],\n\\end{aligned}\n\\label{eq:chi2-sensitivity-contour-real_th23_dcp}\n\\end{equation}\n%-------------------------------------------------\nwhere we marginalize over systematic uncertainties of signals and backgrounds, as mentioned in Section~\\ref{setup-nova-t2k}, and the $3\\sigma$ range of $\\Delta m^2_{31}$ as mentioned in table~\\ref{table:NuFit}. \nIn figure~\\ref{fig:Contour_min_concurrence_NMO}, we project the $\\Delta\\chi^2$ given in eq.~\\ref{eq:chi2-sensitivity-contour-real_th23_dcp}) in the parameter space at the $1\\sigma$ C.L. for the parameter values (except $\\theta_{23}$ and $\\delta_{CP}$) given in table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined} corresponding to our LMS scheme for NMO, in solid blue (for set-1) and green (for set-2) lines.\nThe blue and green triangular dots represent the coordinates in the above-mentioned parameter space for which $\\Delta\\chi^2=0$. The black solid lines and the circular black dots represent the favored regions at $1\\sigma$ C.L. and the best-fit values, as reported by the recent NO$\\nu$A and T2K collaborations~\\cite{T2K:2025wet}. For NO$\\nu$A, it can be seen that the 1$\\sigma$ allowed region in the ($\\sin^2 \\theta_{23}-\\delta_{CP}$) parameter space given in colored (blue and green) solid lines is significantly reduced compared to the region enclosed with black solid lines representing the NO$\\nu$A collaboration observation at 1$\\sigma$ C.L. In the case of T2K, there is a marginal difference in the regions enclosed by the colored and black lines. This can be explained by the fact that, within our LMS scheme, the local minima of concurrence is significantly shifted closer to the energy corresponding to the maximum flux for NO$\\nu$A. In contrast, for T2K, the observed shift is less significant, as the T2K setup already places the peak flux quite closer to the local minima of concurrence. Furthermore, when considering the combined fit of NO$\\nu$A and T2K data, we observe additional improvements due to the increased amount of statistical data in this scenario. Moreover, the best-fit points, denoted by colored triangular dots, are in very good agreement with the observed best-fit values from NO$\\nu$A and T2K individually and in the combined fit for NO$\\nu$A+T2K. Interestingly, the oscillation parameters obtained from the minimum concurrence (both set-1 and set-2 of table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined}) resolve the $\\theta_{23}$ octant degeneracy and show a preference for the higher octant in the left and right columns of figure~\\ref{fig:Contour_min_concurrence_NMO}. In contrast, the middle panel, corresponding to the T2K experimental configuration, does not resolve the $\\theta_{23}$ octant degeneracy, exhibiting nearly equal sensitivity to both the lower and higher octants. We find that, in the presence of minimum total concurrence corresponding to the benchmarks of set-1, the co-ordinates of the best-fit in ($\\sin^2\\theta_{23}-\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}$) plane are ($0.579^{+0.0139}_{-0.0154},\\,{194^{+32}_{-29}}\\,^\\circ$), and for set-2, they are ($0.581^{+0.0136}_{-0.0150},\\,{195^{+38}_{-32}}\\,^\\circ$); whereas the joint collaboration of NO$\\nu$A and T2K~\\cite{T2K:2025wet} gives their best-fit at ($0.561^{+0.021}_{-0.039},\\,{203^{+63}_{-38}}\\,^\\circ$).\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[htb!]\n\t\\centering \n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{./Fig/v1_dcp_Contour_IMO_1+2_sigma_conc_Real_data_T2K_NOVA}\n\t\\caption{\\footnotesize{Same as figure~\\ref{fig:Contour_min_concurrence_NMO} using the common oscillation parameter set given in table~\\ref{tab:IMO_concurrence_combined} for true IMO. \n }} \n\t\\label{fig:Contour_1sigma_IMO_dcp_th23_conc}\n\\end{figure}\n\nWe also conducted the same analysis for the true IMO using the oscillation parameters listed in table~\\ref{tab:IMO_concurrence_combined} and presented the results in figure~\\ref{fig:Contour_1sigma_IMO_dcp_th23_conc}. This figure contains only three panels, as we found only one set of common oscillation parameters under our LMS scheme for this scenario. A similar observation and the explanation as mentioned for figure~\\ref{fig:Contour_min_concurrence_NMO} fits for figure~\\ref{fig:Contour_1sigma_IMO_dcp_th23_conc}. In figure~\\ref{fig:Contour_1sigma_IMO_dcp_th23_conc}, the results obtained from our analysis consistently favor the higher octant across all panels, thereby resolving the $\\theta_{23}$ octant degeneracy. We find that, in the presence of minimum total concurrence corresponding to the benchmarks of table~\\ref{tab:IMO_concurrence_combined}, the co-ordinates of the best-fit in ($\\sin^2\\theta_{23}-\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}$) plane are ($0.595^{+0.0115}_{-0.0126},\\,{294^{+30}_{-38}}\\,^\\circ$); whereas the joint collaboration of NO$\\nu$A and T2K~\\cite{T2K:2025wet} gives their best-fit at ($0.563^{+0.021}_{-0.039},\\,{275^{+31}_{-27}}\\,^\\circ$).\n\nIn figure~\\ref{fig:Contour_min_concurrence_NMO}, the $\\Delta\\chi^2$ values, at the best-fit points, obtained under NMO hypothesis are 64.91, 94.90, and 163.92 for NO$\\nu$A, T2K, and the combined NO$\\nu$A+T2K analysis, respectively. In comparison, the corresponding values in case of IMO, shown in figure~\\ref{fig:Contour_1sigma_IMO_dcp_th23_conc}, are 82.45, 102.291, and 186.45. Since the NMO hypothesis yields consistently lower $\\Delta\\chi^2$ values, our results indicate a preference for NMO over IMO.\n\n\n\\subsection{Influence of LMS scheme on allowed region in ($\\sin^2\\theta_{23}-\\Delta m^2_{31}$) plane}\n\n\n\\begin{figure}[htb!]\n\t\\centering \n \\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{./Fig/Dummy_2_N+T}\n\t\\caption{\\footnotesize{These plots show the bounds in ($\\sin^2\\theta_{23}-\\Delta m^2_{31}$) plane given by NO$\\nu$A (left panel), T2K (middle panel), and NO$\\nu$A+T2K (right panel) at $1\\sigma$ C.L. for 2 d.o.f. Assuming a true NMO, the blue (upper row) and green (lower row) lines depict contours where the remaining oscillation parameters are fixed to the shared T2K and NO$\\nu$A test values listed in table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined} for set-1 and set-2, respectively.\nThe lower triangular solid points represent the values of $(\\sin^2\\theta_{23},\\Delta m^2_{31})$ for which the value of $\\Delta\\chi^2$ is zero. The black lines are the $1\\sigma$ contour taken from the recent NO$\\nu$A results~\\cite{NOvA:2021nfi}, recent T2K results~\\cite{T2K:2023smv} and recent joint result of T2K and NO$\\nu$A~\\cite{T2K:2025wet}, respectively. The black solid dots represent the best-fit values as given by the collaborations~\\cite{T2K:2025wet}.}} \n\t\\label{fig:Contour}\n\\end{figure}\n\nWe address the signature of LMS scheme in the correlations between $\\sin^2\\theta_{23}$ and the third most uncertain oscillation parameters, $\\textit{i.e.,}$ $\\Delta m^2_{31}$ in the light of NO$\\nu$A and T2K in this section through figure~\\ref{fig:Contour}, considering true NMO. Here also, we kept the choice of the benchmark oscillation parameters (except $\\theta_{23}$ and $\\Delta m^2_{31}$) at the local minima of total concurrence as per the aim to keep both the experiments in the same footing [see table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined}]. Figure~\\ref {fig:Contour} depicts the influence of minimum concurrence in the allowed region in ($\\sin^2\\theta_{23}-\\Delta m^2_{31}$) parameter space at $1\\sigma$ C.L. in NO$\\nu$A (left panel), T2K (middle panel), and the combined setup of NO$\\nu$A and T2K (right panel), respectively. The upper (lower) panels are for the benchmark choices according to set-1; blue lines (set-2; green lines) corresponding to the local minima of total concurrence as given in table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined}. The colored triangular dots represent the coordinates of this parameter space for which $\\Delta \\chi^2$ vanishes. On the other hand, the black lines and the black solid dots represent the $1\\sigma$ favorable region and the best-fit values in this parameter space as given by the experimental collaborations~\\cite{T2K:2025wet}. In figure~\\ref{fig:Contour}, our $\\Delta\\chi^2$ is defined as follows.\\\\\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{aligned}\n \\Delta \\chi^2 = \\underset{(\\kappa_s,\\,\\kappa_b,\\,\\delta_\\mathrm{CP})}{\\mathrm{min}} \\bigg[\n &\\chi^2(\\sin^2\\theta_{23}^{\\mathrm{test}} \\in [0.4:0.6], \\, \\Delta m^2_{31} \\in [2.450:\\,2.578]\\times 10^{-3}\\,\\mathrm{eV}^2) \\\\\n &-\\chi^2(\\sin^2\\theta_{23}^{\\mathrm{true}},\\,\\Delta m^{2,{\\mathrm{true}}}_{31} \\in \\mathrm{Real\\,\\, Data})\\bigg].\n\\end{aligned}\n\\label{eq:chi2-sensitivity-contour-real_th23_ldm}\n\\end{equation}\n\nWe marginalize our $\\chi^2$ over the $3\\sigma$ uncertainty of $\\delta_{CP}$, as mentioned in table~\\ref{table:NuFit}, alongside the systematic uncertainties of the signal ($\\kappa_s$) and the background ($\\kappa_b$). As illustrated in figure~\\ref{fig:Contour}, a significantly tighter $1\\sigma$ allowed region for NO$\\nu$A (indicated by both blue and green contours) relative to the official experimental bounds (black contours) is observed, whereas T2K exhibits only a marginal constraint. This behavior is elucidated by figure~\\ref{fig:2_conc_vs_energy}: under the LMS scheme, the local minima of total concurrence shift significantly closer to the energy range, corresponding to the peak flux of NO$\\nu$A, while T2K experiences a negligible shift. Because the T2K beam configuration naturally aligns its peak flux near the local concurrence minima, the resulting parameter space confinement is less pronounced than in NO$\\nu$A. Furthermore, NO$\\nu$A's larger detector volume enhances constraints on $\\sin^2\\theta_{23}$, while its longer baseline induces stronger matter effects that yield a more precise determination of $\\Delta m^2_{31}$ compared to T2K, consistent with official collaboration reports. Ultimately, a joint analysis leverages both higher statistics and the complementary features of these experiments to produce more stringent bounds. Crucially, while neither independent nor combined standard experimental setups can break the $\\theta_{23}$ octant degeneracy, selecting oscillation parameters that shifts local minima of total concurrence within FWHM, significantly increases the number of events, and hence expounds more precision for both $\\theta_{23}$ and $\\Delta m^2_{31}$ and resolve the $\\theta_{23}$ octant ambiguity, even in the individual setups. The best-fit points, indicated by colored triangles, demonstrate good agreement with the experimental best-fit values from individual NO$\\nu$A and T2K data, as well as the joint NO$\\nu$A+T2K fit. We find that, in the presence of minimum total concurrence corresponding to the benchmarks of set-1, the co-ordinates of the best-fit in ($\\sin^2\\theta_{23}-\\Delta m^2_{31}$) plane are ($0.581^{+0.0140}_{-0.0150},\\,{2.522^{+0.0364}_{-0.0348}}\\times10^{-3}\\,\\mathrm{eV}^2$), and for set-2, they are ($0.580^{+0.0140}_{-0.0153},\\,{2.515^{+0.0344}_{-0.0344}}\\times10^{-3}\\,\\mathrm{eV}^2$); whereas the joint collaboration of NO$\\nu$A and T2K~\\cite{T2K:2025wet} gives their best-fit at ($0.561^{+0.021}_{-0.039},\\,{2.505^{+0.1153}_{-0.1053}}\\times10^{-3}\\,\\mathrm{eV}^2$).\n\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\n\n\\subsection{Effect of LMS scheme on examining CP violation}\n\\begin{figure}[htb!]\n\t\\centering \n% \\includegraphics[width=0.98\\linewidth]{./Fig/CPV_multiplot}\n\\includegraphics[width=0.98\\linewidth]{./Fig/v1_New_2_CPV_multiplot}\n\t\\caption{\\footnotesize{The figure displays the effect of the LMS scheme in probing CP violation in the neutrino sector at NO$\\nu$A and T2K. Blue-solid and green-dashed lines show the sensitivity of NO$\\nu$A (left) and T2K (right) for set-1 and set-2 concurrence minima, respectively, of table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined}, whereas the black line denotes the same for the standard oscillation parameters from NuFit 6.0 (see table~\\ref{table:NuFit}). Both plots represent the sensitivity to CPV as a function of true $\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}$. Here, marginalization has been performed over $\\delta_{\\mathrm{CP}}$ and $\\Delta m^2_{31}$ into their 3$\\sigma$ span.\n }} \n\t\\label{fig:CPV_with_max_min_conc}\n\\end{figure}\nNeutrino oscillation studies are a good handle for probing leptonic CP violation, a highly sought-after quest to answer the question of matter-antimatter asymmetry~\\cite{Pascoli:2006ci, T2K:2019bcf, Rahaman:2022rfp, Agarwalla:2013avs, Ghosh:2013yon}. Here, we illustrate the effect of LMS scheme on the capability of detecting CP violation, assuming neutrino as a Dirac fermion. In the left (right) column of figure~\\ref{fig:CPV_with_max_min_conc}, we show the influence of local minima of total concurrence by simulating the ongoing NO$\\nu$A (T2K) experiment according to our goal of study. For this, the quantity $\\Delta\\chi^2_\\mathrm{CPV}$ is defined as follows.\\\\\n\n%-------------------------\n\\begin{equation}\n \\Delta \\chi^2_\\mathrm{CPV} = \\underset{( \\sin^2\\theta_{23},\\,\\Delta m^{2}_{31},\\,\\kappa_s,\\,\\kappa_b)}{\\mathrm{min}} \\bigg[\n \\chi^2(\\delta_{\\mathrm{CP}}^{\\mathrm{test}} \\in \\{0^\\circ,\\,180^\\circ,\\,360^\\circ\\})-\\chi^2(\\delta_{\\mathrm{CP}}^{\\mathrm{true}} \\in [0^{\\circ}, 360^{\\circ}])\\bigg].\n \\label{eq:chi2-sensitivity-cpv}\n\\end{equation}\n%-------------------------------------------------------\nHere, we marginalize the $\\Delta\\chi^2_\\mathrm{CPV}$ over the $3\\sigma$ range of $\\sin^2\\theta_{23},$ and $\\Delta m^{2}_{31},$ as mentioned in~\\cite{Esteban:2024eli} %\\rk{(Ritam: As we have marginalised not only a single value of the parameters, rather the $3\\sigma$ range of that value, hence I wrote that.)} \nafter considering the effects of systematic uncertainties of signals and backgrounds, $\\,\\kappa_s$ and $\\kappa_b$, respectively. We fix our theory at CP-conserving angles $0^\\circ$, $180^\\circ$, and $360^\\circ$ and varied the true value of $\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}$ for all possible values (\\textit{i.e.,} $0^\\circ$ to $360^\\circ$). The benchmark choices of the green and blue lines are according to the set 1 and set 2 concurrence minima, respectively, in table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined}. The black line depicts the sensitivity of CP violation, taking the benchmark choices as mentioned in the global-fit~\\cite{Esteban:2024eli} or in table~\\ref{table:NuFit}.\nWe consider the true mass ordering as NMO for the analysis for figure~\\ref{fig:CPV_with_max_min_conc}.\n\nIn figure~\\ref{fig:CPV_with_max_min_conc}, we observe that NO$\\nu$A is more capable of establishing CP violation at true $\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}= 90^\\circ, 270^\\circ$ for both set 1 and set 2 given in table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined}, rather it outperforms the sensitivity for the NuFit 6.0 global fit parameters. On the other hand, for T2K, the capability of examining the CP-violation is increased for true $\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}=270^\\circ$ for the set 1 benchmark values of table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined}. However, the sensitivity to CP-violation significantly decreases for benchmark values given in set 2.\n\nCP-violation sensitivity depends on the distinguishability of the CP-violating event spectrum from the CP-conserving hypotheses, $\\delta_{CP}=0,\\pi$, over the full reconstructed-energy distribution. Therefore, moving the concurrence minimum closer to the flux peak may also reduce CPV sensitivity if the shifted spectrum becomes more similar to one of the CP-conserving spectra, or if the spectral separation is redistributed away from energy bins that were previously more discriminating. In this case, the local statistical weight improves, but the global CPV hypothesis separation can become weaker. \n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%\\newpage\n\\subsection{Effect of LMS scheme in eliminating the wrong $\\theta_{23}$ octant}\n\\begin{figure}[htb!]\n\t\\centering \n \\includegraphics[width=0.98\\linewidth]{./Fig/v1_New_2_Octant_exclusion_multiplot}\n \\caption{\\footnotesize{The figure displays the effect of LMS scheme in excluding the wrong solution of $\\theta_{23}$ octant at NO$\\nu$A and T2K. Blue-solid and green-dashed lines show the sensitivity of NO$\\nu$A (left) and T2K (right) for set-1 and set-2 concurrence minima (see table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined}), respectively, whereas the black line denotes the same for the standard oscillation parameters from NuFit 6.0 (see table~\\ref{table:NuFit}). Both plots show the sensitivity to the exclusion of the opposite $\\theta_{23}$ octant, depicted as a function of true $\\sin^2\\theta_{23}$. Here, marginalization has been performed over $\\delta_{\\mathrm{CP}}$ and $\\Delta m^2_{31}$ into their 3$\\sigma$ span.}}\n\t\\label{fig:Oct_excl_with_max_min_conc}\n\\end{figure}\nDetermining the correct $\\theta_{23}$ octant is still an open-ended issue in the neutrino oscillation domain. In the neutrino sector, $\\theta_{23}$ is the second most uncertain parameter after $\\delta_{\\mathrm{CP}}$~\\cite{Agarwalla:2013ju, Agarwalla:2021bzs, Ghosh:2015ena}, hence it is important to settle down the correct octant of $\\theta_{23}$. In this section, we see how our LMS scheme affects the exclusion of the opposite $\\theta_{23}$ octant in the present long-baseline experiments NO$\\nu$A and T2K and present our results in figure~\\ref{fig:Oct_excl_with_max_min_conc}. For this purpose, $\\Delta\\chi^2_{\\mathrm{oct}}$ is defined as follows\n%----------------------------------\n\\begin{eqnarray}\n \\Delta \\chi^{2}_{\\text{oct}} &=& \\underset{(\\vec{\\lambda})}{\\mathrm{min}}\\left\\{ \\chi^2\\left(\\sin^2\\theta_{23}^{\\mathrm{test}} \\right) - \\chi^2\\left(\\sin^2\\theta_{23}^{\\mathrm{true}}\\right)\\right\\}\\,.\n\\label{eq:octant-exclusion-chi2}\n\\end{eqnarray}\n%--------------------------------\nHere, while our hypothesis is that $\\theta_{23}$ lies in lower octant (LO), \\textit{i.e.,} $\\sin^2\\theta_{23}^{\\mathrm{test}}\\in [0.4,0.5]$, the true value of $\\theta_{23}$ is in higher octant (HO), \\textit{i.e.,} $\\sin^2\\theta_{23}^{\\mathrm{true}}\\in [0.5,0.6]$. But, while the hypothesis is $\\theta_{23}$ in HO, \\textit{i.e.,} $\\sin^2\\theta_{23}^{\\mathrm{test}}\\in [0.5,0.6]$, the true value of $\\theta_{23}$ is in LO, \\textit{i.e.,} $\\sin^2\\theta_{23}^{\\mathrm{true}}\\in [0.4,0.5]$. So, we are excluding the opposite $\\theta_{23}$ octant in this analysis as we do not know which octant is true in Nature. Here, $\\lambda$ is the marginalized parameter for evaluating $\\Delta\\chi^2_\\mathrm{oct}$ and we take $\\lambda=\\delta_\\mathrm{CP},\\,\\Delta m^2_{31}$ (in their $3\\sigma$ range as given in table~\\ref{table:NuFit}), $\\kappa_s,$ and $\\kappa_b$. Here, the benchmark choices of the oscillation parameters for the blue (green) line are taken from set 1 (set 2) of table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined}. \n\n In figure~\\ref{fig:Oct_excl_with_max_min_conc}, we observe that the $\\theta_{23}$ octant exclusion sensitivity of NO$\\nu$A, for benchmark values of set 1 and set 2 in table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined} (blue and green lines) outperforms the standard case (black line, where we use benchmarks from NuFIT 6.0) in case of both true LO and HO. \n We also observed similar results for T2K, except for a very small range in higher octant where a decrease in the sensitivity can be seen for both blue and green curves. The octant sensitivity is a global degeneracy-resolution problem rather than a purely local precision measure. It depends on the separation between the true-octant spectrum and the best-fit wrong-octant spectrum after marginalization over $\\delta_{CP}$ and $\\Delta m_{31}^2$, and systematic uncertainties. In such cases, the statistical gain from the shift may be offset by increased octant degeneracy, resulting in reduced octant sensitivity. \n\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\subsection{Effect of LMS scheme in examining IMO exclusion sensitivity}\nWe expound the influence of LMS scheme for minimum concurrence on the sensitivity of excluding the IMO in the light of NO$\\nu$A and T2K. Although the present global fit data slightly favors the NMO with $2.5\\sigma$ preference~\\cite{Esteban:2024eli}, neutrino mass-hierarchy ambiguity still cannot be completely resolved either in the ongoing~\\cite{Dixit:2018kev, Petcov:2005rv, Agarwalla:2013qfa, Prakash:2013nra} or in the future long baseline experiments~\\cite{Sarker:2023qzp, Sarker:2026zqv} till date. In figure~\\ref{fig:IMO_excl_sensitivity_with_max_min_conc}, we assume NMO as the true neutrino mass ordering, whereas IMO is the mass ordering in the test spectrum, however this sensitivity is displayed as the function of true $\\delta_{CP}$ in its full possible range, as it is the most uncertain oscillation parameter. The considered uncertainty ranges of the parameters are as per the table~\\ref{table:NuFit}. The benchmark choices for the blue (green) lines are given by set-1 (set-2) of the minimum total concurrence as shown in table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined}, whereas the black lines take the benchmarks as given in NuFIT 6.0 in table~\\ref{table:NuFit}. Here, the definition of $\\Delta\\chi^2_\\mathrm{MH}$ is as follows,\\\\\n%-------------------------\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{aligned}\n \\Delta \\chi^2_\\mathrm{MH} = \\underset{( \\sin^2\\theta_{23},\\,\\kappa_s,\\,\\kappa_b)}{\\mathrm{min}} \\bigg[\n \\chi^2\\big(\\Delta m^{2,\\mathrm{test}}_{31} \\in [-2.55:-2.42]\\times10^{-3}\\,\\mathrm{eV}^2\\big) \\\\\n {}- \\chi^2\\big(\\Delta m^{2,\\mathrm{true}}_{31} \\in [2.45:2.58]\\times10^{-3}\\,\\mathrm{eV}^2\\big)\\bigg],\n\\end{aligned}\n\\label{eq:chi2-sensitivity-MH}\n\\end{equation}\n%-------------------------------------------------------\nwhere, we marginalize our $\\chi^2$ in the $3\\sigma$ range of $\\sin^2\\theta_{23}$ and the systemetic uncertainties of signal ($\\kappa_s$) and the background $\\kappa_b$. We consider the variation of $\\Delta m^2_{31}$ in their $3\\sigma$ range as given in NuFIT 6.0~\\cite{Esteban:2024eli} for both true (NMO) and test (IMO) values.\\\\\n\n\\begin{figure}[H]\n\t\\centering \n% \\includegraphics[width=0.98\\linewidth]{./Fig/CPV_multiplot}\n\\includegraphics[width=0.98\\linewidth]{./Fig/MH_IMexcl_multiplot}\n\\caption{\\footnotesize{The figure displays the effect of LMS scheme in probing IMO exclusion in the neutrino sector at NO$\\nu$A and T2K. Blue-solid and green-dashed lines show the sensitivity of NO$\\nu$A (left) and T2K (right) for set-1 and set-2 concurrence minima (see table~\\ref{tab:NMO_concurrence_combined}), respectively, whereas the black line denotes the same for the standard oscillation parameters from NuFit 6.0 (see table~\\ref{table:NuFit}). Both plots represent the sensitivity to IMO exclusion as a function of true $\\delta_{CP}$. Here, marginalization has been performed over $\\theta_{23}$ into its 3$\\sigma$ span.}} \n\t\\label{fig:IMO_excl_sensitivity_with_max_min_conc}\n\\end{figure}\n\nIn figure~\\ref{fig:IMO_excl_sensitivity_with_max_min_conc}, we investigate that, both NO$\\nu$A and T2K can exclude IMO more in the presence of minimum concurrence than the standard case, where we use benchmarks from NuFIT 6.0 at true $\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}=270^\\circ$. But, in the context of the inter-competition between the two experiments at true $\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}=270^\\circ$, NO$\\nu$A outperforms T2K, either in the standard case,where using benchmarks from NuFIT 6.0 or in the presence of minimum concurrence. NO$\\nu$A's enhanced matter effect due to its longer baseline helps it to achieve more sensitivity to our study. However, both sets of benchmark oscillation parameters corresponding to minimum concurrences show almost equal sensitivity to exclude IMO. At maximum CP-violating phase ($\\textit{i.e.,}\\,\\mathrm{true}\\,\\delta_\\mathrm{CP}=270^\\circ$), T2K shows more significant enhancement than the standard case while taking benchmark choices from NuFIT 6.0, compared to NO$\\nu$A. This happens as the local minima of the concurrence does not shift much for T2K from its 1st oscillation maxima (at $E=0.58$ GeV), and that energy bin also contributes more in the IMO exclusion sensitivity than the other energy bins, which is not happening in NO$\\nu$A.\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\n\n\n\\section{Discussion and Conclusions}\n \\label{sec:Discussion}\nThe long baseline NO$\\nu$A and T2K experiments have had tensions in their results, specifically on the value of the CP-violating phase and the $\\theta_{23}$ octant. Many previous analyses have attempted to resolve this tension using new physics effects, such as non-standard interactions~\\cite{Chatterjee:2020kkm, Denton:2020uda}, non-unitarity of the mixing matrix~\\cite{Miranda:2019ynh}, Lorentz invariance violation~\\cite{Rahaman:2021leu} and decoherence effects~\\cite{Coelho:2017zes, Stankevich:2018wgz, Loulijat:2026vyq} and the tension can be alleviated to varying degrees, see~\\cite{Rahaman:2021zzm} for review. In this work, we analyze the results of NO$\\nu$A and T2K through the entanglement properties of the flavor state, with particular emphasis on the local minima of the entanglement measure.\n\nWe investigated how local minima of total concurrence, an entanglement measure, affects the extraction of a preferred set of oscillation parameters in the long-baseline experiments NO$\\nu$A and T2K. These minima identify energy windows in which the flavor state is closest to separability, potentially enabling a cleaner determination of oscillation parameters. We show that the local minima of total concurrence closely coincide with maxima of QFI. Since QFI plays a central role in quantum metrology and sets the lower bound on parameter uncertainty through an inverse-square-root scaling, $\\Delta \\alpha \\propto 1/\\sqrt{H_Q(\\alpha)}$, its maxima corresponds to the minimum achievable uncertainty in parameter measurement. It supports the argument for clear measurement near local minima of entanglement, where the flavor state is nearly separable. \n\nFurther, to minimize the tension arising from differing energy regimes between NO$\\nu$A and T2K, we choose the common oscillation parameter sets that minimize the concurrence for both experiments within their respective FWHM around the peak fluxes and use these sets as benchmark parameter values. Consequently, this procedure of choosing benchmark values corresponding to the minimum concurrence shifts the local minima of total concurrence and the maxima of QFI closer to the energy values associated with the peak flux for each experiment. We call it the LMS scheme within the higher event statistics region. \n\nFinally, we present the results analyzing the effects of this LMS scheme on the extraction of various oscillation parameters, specifically, CP-violating phase $\\delta_{CP}$, mixing angle $\\theta_{23}$ and mass squared difference $\\Delta m^2_{31}$. We observed that the uncertainty in these three parameters is significantly reduced. Important point to note is that both experiments favor the higher octant ($>45^\\circ$) of $\\theta_{23}$, irrespective of the type of mass ordering. However, we also observed that NMO is favored over IMO by both experiments. The numbers we observed are $\\delta_{CP} = 195^{+38}_{-32}\\,^\\circ$ (for NMO), $\\delta_{CP} = 294^{+29.9}_{-38.2}\\,^\\circ$ (for IMO), $\\sin^2\\theta_{23} = 0.581^{+0.0136}_{-0.0150}$ (for NMO), $\\sin^2\\theta_{23} = 0.595^{+0.0115}_{-0.0126}$ (for IMO) and $\\Delta m^2_{31} = 2.515^{+0.0344}_{-0.0344}\\times10^{-3}\\,\\mathrm{eV}^2$ (for NMO).\n\n We also examine the effects of the LMS scheme on the sensitivity of both experiments to examine CP-violation, to determine the mass ordering, and to eliminate the wrong $\\theta_{23}$ octant. Interestingly, we observe a significant increase in the sensitivity to all these three parameters compared to the NuFIT 6.0 global best-fit parameter set in case of NO$\\nu$A experiment. In case of T2K, we observe a significant enhancement in the sensitivity to the IMO exclusion sensitivity. We also observed a significant increase in sensitivity to eliminate the wrong $\\theta_{23}$ octant, except for some $\\sin^2\\theta_{23}$ values between 0.57 and 0.6, where a slight reduction in sensitivity is observed for T2K. In the context of the CP-violation, a small increase in sensitivity is observed for set-1 of common oscillation parameters corresponding to the minimum concurrence, while a significant decrease for set-2 is observed. The LMS scheme can improve the precision of continuously varying oscillation parameters, since small parameter changes are then probed in an energy region with higher event statistics. However, CP-violation sensitivity is not determined solely by the precision of local parameters. It depends on the distinguishability of the CP-violating event spectrum from the CP-conserving hypotheses, over the full reconstructed-energy distribution. Therefore, moving the concurrence minimum closer to the flux peak may also reduce CP-violation sensitivity if the shifted spectrum becomes more similar to one of the CP-conserving spectra, or if the spectral separation is redistributed away from energy bins that were previously more discriminating. In this case, the local statistical weight improves, but the global CPV hypothesis separation can become weaker.\n\n Recent works have demonstrated that QFI provides a powerful quantum-metrological diagnostic for neutrino oscillations, yielding measurement-independent precision bounds and clarifying how efficiently flavor measurements extract the information encoded in the neutrino state \\cite{Ignoti:2025rxr, Frugiuele:2026yeq, Chundawat:2026lcm, Huang:2026bws, Yadav:2026mnw}. These analyses primarily focus on the QFI content itself, the associated quantum Cramér-Rao bounds, and the comparison between intrinsic and experimentally accessible Fisher information. In the present work we go beyond this information-content analysis and develop a complementary direction by relating parameter sensitivity to the behavior of quantum correlations, specifically the local minima of total concurrence. We show that these minima can be used not only as diagnostic markers of favorable energy windows, but also as a practical guide for improving the extraction of oscillation parameters in existing long-baseline experiments. Applying this strategy to NO$\\nu$A and T2K, we study its effect on joint parameter constraints and on key physics sensitivities, including leptonic CP violation, $\\theta_{23}$ octant determination, and establishment of the correct mass ordering, while also examining its role in reducing the tension between the two experiments within their present experimental limitations.\n\nThis work highlights the role of quantum information measures as useful diagnostic tools for understanding where oscillation parameters are intrinsically most accessible in neutrino flavor evolution. When combined with realistic flux, statistics, and spectral distinguishability, these tools can provide deeper insight into both precision estimation and sensitivity studies for CP violation, mass ordering, and parameter degeneracies.\n\n\n\n\\acknowledgments \nWe especially thank Ushak Rahaman for his helpful discussions and contributions to the GLoBES simulation framework. K.D. and S.R. would like to acknowledge support from the National Research Foundation of South Africa through a NITheCS grant. The numerical simulations were performed using the SAMKHYA: High-Performance Computing Facility at the Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar. RK acknowledges the help of Makrand Siddhabhatti in accessing the HPC SAMKHYA.\n\n\n%\\newpage\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\appendix\n%\\section{Appendix}\n\\label{Appendix}\n\\renewcommand\\thefigure{A\\arabic{figure}}\n\\renewcommand\\theHfigure{A\\arabic{figure}}\n\\renewcommand\\thetable{A\\arabic{table}}\n\\renewcommand\\theHtable{A\\arabic{table}}\n\\setcounter{table}{0} \n\\setcounter{figure}{0} \n\\setcounter{equation}{0}\n\n\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n%\\newpage\n\\bibliographystyle{JHEP}\n\\bibliography{nuqi}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\\end{document}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: nuqi.bib\n================================================\n%% This BibTeX bibliography file was created using BibDesk.\n%% https://bibdesk.sourceforge.io/\n\n%% Created for neutrino at 2021-07-19 02:33:08 +0530 \n\n\n%% Saved with string encoding Unicode (UTF-8)\n\n@article{Miranda:2019ynh,\n author = \"Miranda, Luis Salvador and Pasquini, Pedro and Rahaman, Ushak and Razzaque, Soebur\",\n title = \"{Searching for non-unitary neutrino oscillations in the present T2K and NO$\\nu $A data}\",\n eprint = \"1911.09398\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09227-0\",\n journal = \"Eur. Phys. J. C\",\n volume = \"81\",\n number = \"5\",\n pages = \"444\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Rahaman:2021leu,\n author = \"Rahaman, Ushak\",\n title = \"{Looking for Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) in the latest long baseline accelerator neutrino oscillation data}\",\n eprint = \"2103.04576\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09598-4\",\n journal = \"Eur. Phys. J. C\",\n volume = \"81\",\n number = \"9\",\n pages = \"792\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Chatterjee:2020kkm,\n author = \"Chatterjee, Sabya Sachi and Palazzo, Antonio\",\n title = \"{Nonstandard Neutrino Interactions as a Solution to the $NO\\nu A$ and T2K Discrepancy}\",\n eprint = \"2008.04161\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"IPPP/20/35\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.051802\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"126\",\n number = \"5\",\n pages = \"051802\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Denton:2020uda,\n author = \"Denton, Peter B. and Gehrlein, Julia and Pestes, Rebekah\",\n title = \"{$CP$ -Violating Neutrino Nonstandard Interactions in Long-Baseline-Accelerator Data}\",\n eprint = \"2008.01110\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.051801\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"126\",\n number = \"5\",\n pages = \"051801\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Barr:2024djo,\n author = \"Barr, Alan J. and Fabbrichesi, Marco and Floreanini, Roberto and Gabrielli, Emidio and Marzola, Luca\",\n title = \"{Quantum entanglement and Bell inequality violation at colliders}\",\n eprint = \"2402.07972\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.ppnp.2024.104134\",\n journal = \"Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.\",\n volume = \"139\",\n pages = \"104134\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Zhang:2025mmm,\n author = \"Zhang, Yulei and Zhou, Bai-Hong and Liu, Qi-Bin and Wu, Tong Arthur and Li, Shu and Han, Tao and Hsu, Shih-Chieh and Low, Matthew\",\n title = \"{Entanglement and Bell nonlocality in {\\ensuremath{\\tau}}$^{+}${\\ensuremath{\\tau}}$^{-}$ at the LHC using machine learning for neutrino reconstruction}\",\n eprint = \"2504.01496\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP04(2026)190\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"04\",\n pages = \"190\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{ATLAS:2023fsd,\n author = \"Aad, Georges and others\",\n collaboration = \"ATLAS\",\n title = \"{Observation of quantum entanglement with top quarks at the ATLAS detector}\",\n eprint = \"2311.07288\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ex\",\n reportNumber = \"CERN-EP-2023-230\",\n doi = \"10.1038/s41586-024-07824-z\",\n journal = \"Nature\",\n volume = \"633\",\n number = \"8030\",\n pages = \"542--547\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Pfenniger:2006rd,\n author = \"Pfenniger, Daniel and Observatory, Veruska Muccione Geneva\",\n title = \"{Cosmological Neutrino Entanglement and Quantum Pressure}\",\n eprint = \"astro-ph/0605354\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1051/0004-6361:20054496\",\n journal = \"Astron. Astrophys.\",\n volume = \"456\",\n pages = \"45\",\n year = \"2006\"\n}\n\n@article{Dixit:2019lsg,\n author = \"Dixit, Khushboo and Naikoo, Javid and Mukhopadhyay, Banibrata and Banerjee, Subhashish\",\n title = \"{Quantum correlations in neutrino oscillations in curved spacetime}\",\n eprint = \"1903.05664\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.100.055021\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"100\",\n number = \"5\",\n pages = \"055021\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Balantekin:2022lys,\n author = \"Balantekin, A. B.\",\n title = \"{Quantum Entanglement and Neutrino Many-Body Systems}\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1742-6596/2191/1/012004\",\n journal = \"J. Phys. Conf. Ser.\",\n volume = \"2191\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"012004\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Roggero:2022hpy,\n author = \"Roggero, Alessandro and Rrapaj, Ermal and Xiong, Zewei\",\n title = \"{Entanglement and correlations in fast collective neutrino flavor oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"2203.02783\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.HE\",\n reportNumber = \"N3AS-22-006,IQuS@UW-21-023\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.106.043022\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"106\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"043022\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Dixit:2024pcj,\n author = \"Dixit, Khushboo and Haque, S. Shajidul and Razzaque, Soebur\",\n title = \"{Spread Complexity of High Energy Neutrino Propagation over Astrophysical Distances}\",\n eprint = \"2406.07491\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1007/s10773-024-05873-8\",\n journal = \"Int. J. Theor. Phys.\",\n volume = \"64\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"9\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{SinghKoranga:2026kiu,\n author = \"Singh Koranga, Bipin and Farooq, Baktiar Wasir\",\n title = \"{Entanglement Signatures of CPT Violation in Neutrino Oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"2603.28841\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n month = \"3\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Banerjee:2026jpv,\n author = {Banerjee, Subhashish and P{\\\"a}s, Heinrich and Rani, Erika},\n title = \"{Tripartite entanglement of oscillating and decohering neutrinos}\",\n eprint = \"2606.14454\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n month = \"6\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@phdthesis{Dixit:2021jrk,\n author = \"Dixit, Khushboo\",\n title = \"{A study of quantum mechanical aspects in neutrino oscillations}\",\n school = \"IIT, Jodhpur\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Dixit:2024mbf,\n author = \"Dixit, Khushboo and Haque, S. Shajidul and Razzaque, Soebur\",\n title = \"{Measure of Quantum Complexity in Neutrino Oscillations}\",\n doi = \"10.22323/1.476.0229\",\n journal = \"PoS\",\n volume = \"ICHEP2024\",\n pages = \"229\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Zanardi:2002pwt,\n author = \"Zanardi, Paolo\",\n title = \"{Quantum entanglement in fermionic lattices}\",\n eprint = \"quant-ph/0104114\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevA.65.042101\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. A\",\n volume = \"65\",\n number = \"4\",\n pages = \"042101\",\n year = \"2002\"\n}\n\n@article{Shi:2003zz,\n author = \"Shi, Yu\",\n title = \"{Quantum entanglement of identical particles}\",\n eprint = \"quant-ph/0205069\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevA.67.024301\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. A\",\n volume = \"67\",\n pages = \"024301\",\n year = \"2003\"\n}\n@article{Coelho:2017zes,\n author = \"Coelho, Joao A. B. and Mann, W. Anthony and Bashar, Saqib S.\",\n title = \"{Nonmaximal $\\theta_{23}$ mixing at NOvA from neutrino decoherence}\",\n eprint = \"1702.04738\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.221801\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"118\",\n number = \"22\",\n pages = \"221801\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Stankevich:2018wgz,\n author = \"Stankevich, Konstantin and Studenikin, Alexander\",\n editor = \"Checchia, Paolo and others\",\n title = \"{Neutrino quantum decoherence due to entanglement with a magnetic field}\",\n eprint = \"1801.08896\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.22323/1.314.0645\",\n journal = \"PoS\",\n volume = \"EPS-HEP2017\",\n pages = \"645\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Loulijat:2026vyq,\n author = \"Loulijat, Jilali and Slaoui, Abdallah and Gouighri, Mohamed and Teklu, Berihu\",\n title = \"{Influence of Quantum Decoherence on the Survival of Neutrino Oscillation Quantumness}\",\n eprint = \"2605.24654\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"quant-ph\",\n month = \"5\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n\n@article{PhysRevLett.92.180401,\n title = {Experimental Demonstration of Single Photon Nonlocality},\n author = {Hessmo, Bj\\\"orn and Usachev, Pavel and Heydari, Hoshang and Bj\\\"ork, Gunnar},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},\n volume = {92},\n issue = {18},\n pages = {180401},\n numpages = {4},\n year = {2004},\n month = {May},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.180401},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.180401}\n}\n\n@article{PhysRevLett.88.070402,\n title = {Teleportation of a Vacuum--One-Photon Qubit},\n author = {Lombardi, Egilberto and Sciarrino, Fabio and Popescu, Sandu and De Martini, Francesco},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},\n volume = {88},\n issue = {7},\n pages = {070402},\n numpages = {4},\n year = {2002},\n month = {Jan},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.070402},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.070402}\n}\n\n\n@article{PhysRevLett.87.050402,\n title = {Quantum State Reconstruction of the Single-Photon Fock State},\n author = {Lvovsky, A. I. and Hansen, H. and Aichele, T. and Benson, O. and Mlynek, J. and Schiller, S.},\n journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},\n volume = {87},\n issue = {5},\n pages = {050402},\n numpages = {4},\n year = {2001},\n month = {Jul},\n publisher = {American Physical Society},\n doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.050402},\n url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.050402}\n}\n\n\n@article{Blasone:2007vw,\n author = \"Blasone, Massimo and Dell'Anno, Fabio and De Siena, Silvio and Illuminati, Fabrizio\",\n title = \"{Entanglement in neutrino oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"0707.4476\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1209/0295-5075/85/50002\",\n journal = \"EPL\",\n volume = \"85\",\n pages = \"50002\",\n year = \"2009\"\n}\n\n@article{Banerjee:2015mha,\n author = \"Banerjee, Subhashish and Alok, Ashutosh Kumar and Srikanth, R. and Hiesmayr, Beatrix C.\",\n title = \"{A quantum information theoretic analysis of three flavor neutrino oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"1508.03480\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3717-x\",\n journal = \"Eur. Phys. J. C\",\n volume = \"75\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"487\",\n year = \"2015\"\n}\n\n@article{Sarkar:2020vob,\n author = \"Sarkar, Trisha and Dixit, Khushboo\",\n title = \"{Effects of nonstandard interaction on temporal and spatial correlations in neutrino oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"2010.02175\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08874-7\",\n journal = \"Eur. Phys. J. C\",\n volume = \"81\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"88\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Konwar:2025ipv,\n author = \"Konwar, Lekhashri and Panda, Papia and Mohanta, Rukmani\",\n title = \"{Effect of off-diagonal NSI parameters on entanglement measurements in neutrino oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"2507.04885\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1361-6471/ae5076\",\n journal = \"J. Phys. G\",\n volume = \"53\",\n number = \"3\",\n pages = \"035002\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Dixit:2019swl,\n author = \"Dixit, Khushboo and Kumar Alok, Ashutosh\",\n title = \"{New physics effects on quantum coherence in neutrino oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"1909.04887\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01311-4\",\n journal = \"Eur. Phys. J. Plus\",\n volume = \"136\",\n number = \"3\",\n pages = \"334\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Benatti:2000ph,\n author = \"Benatti, F. and Floreanini, R.\",\n title = \"{Open system approach to neutrino oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/0002221\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1126-6708/2000/02/032\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"02\",\n pages = \"032\",\n year = \"2000\"\n}\n\n@article{Fiza:2021gvq,\n author = \"Fiza, Nishat and Masud, Mehedi and Mitra, Manimala\",\n title = \"{Exploring the new physics phases in 3+1 scenario in neutrino oscillation experiments}\",\n eprint = \"2102.05063\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP09(2021)162\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"09\",\n pages = \"162\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Alam:2026bxn,\n author = \"Alam, Murshed and Brdar, Vedran and Chattopadhyay, Dibya S.\",\n title = \"{Exploring quantumness at long-baseline neutrino experiments}\",\n eprint = \"2601.15375\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP06(2026)221\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n pages = \"221\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Cherchiglia:2023ojf,\n author = \"Cherchiglia, Adriano and Pasquini, Pedro and Peres, O. L. G. and Rodrigues, F. F. and Rossi, R. R. and Souza, E. S.\",\n title = \"{Alleviating the present tension between T2K and NO{\\ensuremath{\\nu}}A with nonstandard neutrino interactions}\",\n eprint = \"2310.18401\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/55qm-zbhv\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"112\",\n number = \"9\",\n pages = \"093004\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Hill:1997pfa,\n author = \"Hill, Scott and Wootters, William K.\",\n title = \"{Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits}\",\n eprint = \"quant-ph/9703041\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.5022\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"78\",\n pages = \"5022--5025\",\n year = \"1997\"\n}\n\n@article{Coffman:1999jd,\n author = \"Coffman, Valerie and Kundu, Joydip and Wootters, William K.\",\n title = \"{Distributed entanglement}\",\n eprint = \"quant-ph/9907047\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052306\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. A\",\n volume = \"61\",\n pages = \"052306\",\n year = \"2000\"\n}\n\n@article{Rahaman:2022rfp,\n author = \"Rahaman, Ushak and Razzaque, Soebur and Sankar, Sankagiri Uma\",\n title = \"{A Review of the Tension between the T2K and NO{\\ensuremath{\\nu}}A Appearance Data and Hints to New Physics}\",\n eprint = \"2201.03250\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.3390/universe8020109\",\n journal = \"Universe\",\n volume = \"8\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"109\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Rahaman:2021zzm,\n author = \"Rahaman, Ushak and Raut, Sushant K.\",\n title = \"{On the tension between the latest NO$\\nu $A~and T2K data}\",\n eprint = \"2112.13186\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10808-w\",\n journal = \"Eur. Phys. J. C\",\n volume = \"82\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"910\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Diwan:2016gmz,\n author = \"Diwan, M. V. and Galymov, V. and Qian, X. and Rubbia, A.\",\n title = \"{Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiments}\",\n eprint = \"1608.06237\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ex\",\n doi = \"10.1146/annurev-nucl-102014-021939\",\n journal = \"Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.\",\n volume = \"66\",\n pages = \"47--71\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n@article{Mena:2005ek,\n author = \"Mena, Olga\",\n title = \"{Unveiling neutrino mixing and leptonic CP violation}\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/0503097\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-05-035-T\",\n doi = \"10.1142/S0217732305016269\",\n journal = \"Mod. Phys. Lett. A\",\n volume = \"20\",\n pages = \"1--17\",\n year = \"2005\"\n}\n\n@article{Farzan:2017xzy,\n author = \"Farzan, Y. and Tortola, M.\",\n title = \"{Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions}\",\n eprint = \"1710.09360\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.3389/fphy.2018.00010\",\n journal = \"Front. in Phys.\",\n volume = \"6\",\n pages = \"10\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n@article{Huber:2004ka,\n author = \"Huber, Patrick and Lindner, M. and Winter, W.\",\n title = \"{Simulation of long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES (General Long Baseline Experiment Simulator)}\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/0407333\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"TUM-HEP-553-04\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.cpc.2005.01.003\",\n journal = \"Comput. Phys. Commun.\",\n volume = \"167\",\n pages = \"195\",\n year = \"2005\"\n}\n\n@article{Huber:2007ji,\n author = \"Huber, Patrick and Kopp, Joachim and Lindner, Manfred and Rolinec, Mark and Winter, Walter\",\n title = \"{New features in the simulation of neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES 3.0: General Long Baseline Experiment Simulator}\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/0701187\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"TUM-HEP-656-07\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.cpc.2007.05.004\",\n journal = \"Comput. Phys. Commun.\",\n volume = \"177\",\n pages = \"432--438\",\n year = \"2007\"\n}\n\n@article{Agarwalla:2013ju,\n author = \"Agarwalla, Sanjib Kumar and Prakash, Suprabh and Sankar, S. Uma\",\n title = \"{Resolving the octant of theta23 with T2K and NOvA}\",\n eprint = \"1301.2574\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"IFIC-12-85\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP07(2013)131\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"07\",\n pages = \"131\",\n year = \"2013\"\n}\n\n@article{Dixit:2018kev,\n author = \"Dixit, Khushboo and Naikoo, Javid and Banerjee, Subhashish and Alok, Ashutosh Kumar\",\n title = \"{Quantum correlations and the neutrino mass degeneracy problem}\",\n eprint = \"1807.01546\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6376-x\",\n journal = \"Eur. Phys. J. C\",\n volume = \"78\",\n number = \"11\",\n pages = \"914\",\n year = \"2018\"\n}\n\n@article{Petcov:2005rv,\n author = \"Petcov, S. T. and Schwetz, T.\",\n title = \"{Determining the neutrino mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos}\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/0511277\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"SISSA-94-2005-EP\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.01.020\",\n journal = \"Nucl. Phys. B\",\n volume = \"740\",\n pages = \"1--22\",\n year = \"2006\"\n}\n\n@article{Agarwalla:2013qfa,\n author = \"Agarwalla, Sanjib Kumar and Prakash, Suprabh and Wang, Wei\",\n title = \"{High-precision measurement of atmospheric mass-squared splitting with T2K and NOvA}\",\n eprint = \"1312.1477\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"IP-BBSR-2013-18\",\n month = \"12\",\n year = \"2013\"\n}\n\n@article{Prakash:2013nra,\n author = \"Prakash, Suprabh and Raut, Sushant and Sankar, S. Uma\",\n editor = \"Blondel, Alain and Efthymiopoulos, Ilias and Prior, Gersende\",\n title = \"{Mass hierarchy determination using current and upcoming neutrino experiments}\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1742-6596/408/1/012035\",\n journal = \"J. Phys. Conf. Ser.\",\n volume = \"408\",\n pages = \"012035\",\n year = \"2013\"\n}\n\n@article{Dutta:2012et,\n author = \"Dutta, Rupak and Sinha, Nita and Raut, Sushant K.\",\n title = \"{Determining neutrino mass hierarchy from electron disappearance at a Low energy neutrino factory}\",\n eprint = \"1210.6479\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"IMSC-2012-10-16\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.89.073011\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"89\",\n number = \"7\",\n pages = \"073011\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n\n@article{Pascoli:2006ci,\n author = \"Pascoli, S. and Petcov, S. T. and Riotto, Antonio\",\n title = \"{Leptogenesis and Low Energy CP Violation in Neutrino Physics}\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/0611338\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"DCPT-06-166, CERN-PH-TH-2006-213, IPPP-06-83, SISSA-71-2006-EP\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.02.019\",\n journal = \"Nucl. Phys. B\",\n volume = \"774\",\n pages = \"1--52\",\n year = \"2007\"\n}\n\n@article{T2K:2019bcf,\n author = \"Abe, K. and others\",\n collaboration = \"T2K\",\n title = \"{Constraint on the matter{\\textendash}antimatter symmetry-violating phase in neutrino oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"1910.03887\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ex\",\n doi = \"10.1038/s41586-020-2177-0\",\n journal = \"Nature\",\n volume = \"580\",\n number = \"7803\",\n pages = \"339--344\",\n year = \"2020\",\n note = \"[Erratum: Nature 583, E16 (2020)]\"\n}\n\n@article{Agarwalla:2013avs,\n author = \"Agarwalla, Sanjib Kumar and Prakash, Suprabh and Raut, Sushant K. and Uma Sankar, S.\",\n editor = \"Bernardini, Paolo and Fogli, Gianluigi and Lisi, Eligio\",\n title = \"{Potential of optimized NOvA for large $\\theta_{13}$ and combined performance with a LArTPC and T2K}\",\n doi = \"10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2013.04.088\",\n journal = \"Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.\",\n volume = \"237-238\",\n pages = \"193--195\",\n year = \"2013\"\n}\n\n@article{Ghosh:2013yon,\n author = \"Ghosh, Monojit and Ghoshal, Pomita and Goswami, Srubabati and Raut, Sushant K.\",\n title = \"{Can atmospheric neutrino experiments provide the first hint of leptonic CP violation?}\",\n eprint = \"1306.2500\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.89.011301\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"89\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"011301\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n\n@article{Sarker:2023qzp,\n author = \"Sarker, Arnab and Medhi, Abinash and Bezboruah, Dharitree and Devi, Moon Moon and Dutta, Debajyoti\",\n title = \"{Impact of scalar NSI on the neutrino mass ordering sensitivity at DUNE, HK and KNO}\",\n eprint = \"2309.12249\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP06(2024)128\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n pages = \"128\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Sarker:2026zqv,\n author = \"Sarker, Arnab and Bezboruah, Dharitree and Medhi, Abinash and Devi, Moon Moon and Dutta, Debajyoti\",\n title = \"{Scalar NSI and~Neutrino Mass Ordering Sensitivities in~Long-Baseline $\\nu $-Experiments}\",\n doi = \"10.1007/978-981-95-1513-4_282\",\n journal = \"Springer Proc. Phys.\",\n volume = \"432\",\n pages = \"1240--1243\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Mikola:2024jnj,\n author = \"Mikola, Veera\",\n collaboration = \"T2K, NOvA\",\n title = \"{Results from the T2K+NOvA Joint Analysis}\",\n doi = \"10.1051/epjconf/202431202002\",\n journal = \"EPJ Web Conf.\",\n volume = \"312\",\n pages = \"02002\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@inproceedings{Wolcott:2024,\n author = {Wolcott, Jeremy},\n title = {{New NOvA Results with 10 Years of Data}},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of the XXVI International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics (Neutrino 2024)},\n year = {2024},\n month = {Aug},\n note = {Presented on behalf of the NOvA Collaboration},\n reportNumber = {FERMILAB-SLIDES-24-0130-PPD},\n doi = {10.2172/2429313},\n url = {https://inspirehep.net/literature/2817608}\n}\n\n@article{Blennow:2013oma,\n author = \"Blennow, Mattias and Coloma, Pilar and Huber, Patrick and Schwetz, Thomas\",\n title = \"{Quantifying the sensitivity of oscillation experiments to the neutrino mass ordering}\",\n eprint = \"1311.1822\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP03(2014)028\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"03\",\n pages = \"028\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n\n@article{Huber:2002mx,\n author = \"Huber, Patrick and Lindner, Manfred and Winter, Walter\",\n title = \"{Superbeams versus neutrino factories}\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/0204352\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"TUM-HEP-462-02, MPI-PHT-02-15\",\n doi = \"10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00825-8\",\n journal = \"Nucl. Phys. B\",\n volume = \"645\",\n pages = \"3--48\",\n year = \"2002\"\n}\n\n@article{Fogli:2002pt,\n author = \"Fogli, G. L. and Lisi, E. and Marrone, A. and Montanino, D. and Palazzo, A.\",\n title = \"{Getting the most from the statistical analysis of solar neutrino oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/0206162\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.66.053010\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"66\",\n pages = \"053010\",\n year = \"2002\"\n}\n\n@article{Gonzalez-Garcia:2004pka,\n author = \"Gonzalez-Garcia, M. C. and Maltoni, Michele\",\n title = \"{Atmospheric neutrino oscillations and new physics}\",\n eprint = \"hep-ph/0404085\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n reportNumber = \"YITP-SB-18-04\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.70.033010\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"70\",\n pages = \"033010\",\n year = \"2004\"\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n@article{Chatterjee:2024kbn,\n author = \"Chatterjee, Sabya Sachi and Palazzo, Antonio\",\n title = \"{Status of tension between NOvA and T2K after Neutrino 2024 and possible role of nonstandard neutrino interactions}\",\n eprint = \"2409.10599\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.110.113002\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"110\",\n number = \"11\",\n pages = \"113002\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{Nizam:2018got,\n author = \"Nizam, Mohammad and Bharti, Suman and Prakash, Suprabh and Rahaman, Ushak and Uma Sankar, S.\",\n title = \"{Tensions between the appearance data of T2K and NO$\\nu$A}\",\n eprint = \"1811.01210\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1142/S0217732320500212\",\n journal = \"Mod. Phys. Lett. A\",\n volume = \"35\",\n number = \"06\",\n pages = \"06\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n@article{Prakash:2013tta,\n author = \"Prakash, S. and Raut, Sushant K. and Uma Sankar, S.\",\n editor = \"Limosani, Antonio\",\n title = \"{Getting the best out of T2K and NOvA}\",\n doi = \"10.22323/1.174.0394\",\n journal = \"PoS\",\n volume = \"ICHEP2012\",\n pages = \"394\",\n year = \"2013\"\n}\n\n@article{Maki:1962mu,\n author = \"Maki, Ziro and Nakagawa, Masami and Sakata, Shoichi\",\n title = \"{Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles}\",\n doi = \"10.1143/PTP.28.870\",\n journal = \"Prog. Theor. Phys.\",\n volume = \"28\",\n pages = \"870--880\",\n year = \"1962\"\n}\n\n@article{Pontecorvo:1967fh,\n author = \"Pontecorvo, B.\",\n title = \"{Neutrino Experiments and the Problem of Conservation of Leptonic Charge}\",\n journal = \"Sov. Phys. JETP\",\n volume = \"26\",\n pages = \"984--988\",\n year = \"1968\"\n}\n\n@book{Giunti:2007ry,\n author = \"Giunti, Carlo and Kim, Chung W.\",\n title = \"{Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics}\",\n doi = \"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508717.001.0001\",\n isbn = \"978-0-19-850871-7\",\n year = \"2007\"\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Evans:2017brt,\n author = \"Evans, Justin\",\n collaboration = \"MINOS, MINOS+\",\n title = \"{New results from MINOS and MINOS+}\",\n doi = \"10.1088/1742-6596/888/1/012017\",\n journal = \"J. Phys. Conf. Ser.\",\n volume = \"888\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"012017\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n@article{MINOS:2020llm,\n author = \"Adamson, P. and others\",\n collaboration = \"MINOS+\",\n title = \"{Precision Constraints for Three-Flavor Neutrino Oscillations from the Full MINOS+ and MINOS Dataset}\",\n eprint = \"2006.15208\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ex\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-20-253-ND\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.131802\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"125\",\n number = \"13\",\n pages = \"131802\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Li:2022mus,\n author = \"Li, Yu-Wen and Li, Li-Juan and Song, Xue-Ke and Wang, Dong and Ye, Liu\",\n title = \"{Geuine tripartite entanglement in three-flavor neutrino oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"2205.11058\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"quant-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10759-2\",\n journal = \"Eur. Phys. J. C\",\n volume = \"82\",\n number = \"9\",\n pages = \"799\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Jha:2020dav,\n author = \"Jha, Abhishek Kumar and Mukherjee, Supratik and Bambah, Bindu A.\",\n title = \"{Tri-Partite entanglement in Neutrino Oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"2004.14853\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1142/S0217732321500565\",\n journal = \"Mod. Phys. Lett. A\",\n volume = \"36\",\n number = \"09\",\n pages = \"2150056\",\n year = \"2021\"\n}\n\n@article{Dixit:2018gjc,\n author = \"Dixit, Khushboo and Naikoo, Javid and Banerjee, Subhashish and Kumar Alok, Ashutosh\",\n title = \"{Study of coherence and mixedness in meson and neutrino systems}\",\n eprint = \"1809.09947\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6609-7\",\n journal = \"Eur. Phys. J. C\",\n volume = \"79\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"96\",\n year = \"2019\"\n}\n\n@article{Siwach:2022xhx,\n author = \"Siwach, Pooja and Suliga, Anna M. and Balantekin, A. Baha\",\n title = \"{Entanglement in three-flavor collective neutrino oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"2211.07678\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"N3AS-22-023, INT-PUB-22-051\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.107.023019\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"107\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"023019\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{Wootters:1997id,\n author = \"Wootters, William K.\",\n title = \"{Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits}\",\n eprint = \"quant-ph/9709029\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2245\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"80\",\n pages = \"2245--2248\",\n year = \"1998\"\n}\n\n@article{sarkar2021geometry,\n author = {Sarkar, Ramita and Banerjee, Shreya and Bag, Subhasish and Panigrahi, Prasanta K.},\n title = {Geometry of distributive multiparty entanglement in 4-qubit hypergraph states},\n journal = {IET Quantum Communication},\n volume = {3},\n number = {1},\n pages = {72--84},\n year = {2021},\n month = {November},\n publisher = {The Institution of Engineering and Technology},\n doi = {10.1049/qtc2.12027},\n url = {https://doi.org}\n}\n\n@article{dutta2019permutation,\n title = {Permutation Symmetric Hypergraph States and Multipartite Quantum Entanglement},\n author = {Dutta, Supriyo and Sarkar, Ramita and Panigrahi, Prasanta K.},\n journal = {International Journal of Theoretical Physics},\n volume = {58},\n number = {11},\n pages = {3927--3944},\n year = {2019},\n month = {Nov},\n publisher = {Springer},\n doi = {10.1007/s10773-019-04259-2},\n url = {https://doi.org}\n}\n\n@article{Feldman:2012jdx,\n author = \"Feldman, G. J. and Hartnell, J. and Kobayashi, T.\",\n title = \"{Long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments}\",\n eprint = \"1210.1778\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ex\",\n doi = \"10.1155/2013/475749\",\n journal = \"Adv. High Energy Phys.\",\n volume = \"2013\",\n pages = \"475749\",\n year = \"2013\"\n}\n\n@article{Agarwalla:2014fva,\n author = \"Agarwalla, Sanjib Kumar\",\n title = \"{Physics Potential of Long-Baseline Experiments}\",\n eprint = \"1401.4705\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1155/2014/457803\",\n journal = \"Adv. High Energy Phys.\",\n volume = \"2014\",\n pages = \"457803\",\n year = \"2014\"\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n@article{Esteban:2024eli,\n author = \"Esteban, Ivan and Gonzalez-Garcia, M. C. and Maltoni, Michele and Martinez-Soler, Ivan and Pinheiro, Jo{\\~a}o Paulo and Schwetz, Thomas\",\n title = \"{NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"2410.05380\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"IFT-UAM/CSIC-24-140, YITP-SB-2024-24, IPPP/24/64, IPPP/24/64, IFT-UAM/CSIC-24-140, YITP-SB-2024-24\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP12(2024)216\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"12\",\n pages = \"216\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n\n@article{DUNE:2020jqi,\n author = \"Abi, B. and others\",\n collaboration = \"DUNE\",\n title = \"{Long-baseline neutrino oscillation physics potential of the DUNE experiment}\",\n eprint = \"2006.16043\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ex\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-20-251-E-LBNF-ND-PIP2-SCD, PUB-20-251-E-LBNF-ND-PIP2-SCD\",\n doi = \"10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08456-z\",\n journal = \"Eur. Phys. J. C\",\n volume = \"80\",\n number = \"10\",\n pages = \"978\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n@article{Banerjee:2024lih,\n author = \"Banerjee, Rajrupa and Panda, Papia and Mohanta, Rukmani and Patra, Sudhanwa\",\n title = \"{Analysis of neutrino oscillation parameters in the light on quantum entanglement}\",\n eprint = \"2410.05727\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n month = \"10\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n\n\n@book{Nielsen_Chuang_2010, place={Cambridge}, title={Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition}, publisher={Cambridge University Press}, author={Nielsen, Michael A. and Chuang, Isaac L.}, year={2010}} \n\n\n@article{SinghKoranga:2024rum,\n author = \"Singh Koranga, Bipin and Farooq, Baktiar Wasir\",\n title = \"{Two Flavour Neutrino Oscillation in Matter and Quantum Entanglement}\",\n eprint = \"2410.09137\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n month = \"10\",\n year = \"2024\"\n}\n\n@article{T2K:2023smv,\n author = \"Abe, K. and others\",\n collaboration = \"T2K\",\n title = \"{Measurements of neutrino oscillation parameters from the T2K experiment using $3.6\\times 10^{21}$ protons on target}\",\n eprint = \"2303.03222\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ex\",\n doi = \"10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11819-x\",\n journal = \"Eur. Phys. J. C\",\n volume = \"83\",\n number = \"9\",\n pages = \"782\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{T2K:2025wet,\n author = \"Abubakar, S. and others\",\n collaboration = \"T2K, NOvA\",\n title = \"{Joint neutrino oscillation analysis from the T2K and NOvA experiments}\",\n eprint = \"2510.19888\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ex\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-25-0132-PPD\",\n doi = \"10.1038/s41586-025-09599-3\",\n journal = \"Nature\",\n volume = \"646\",\n number = \"8086\",\n pages = \"818--824\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Nogueira:2016qsk,\n author = \"Nogueira, Edson C. and de Souza, Gustavo and Varizi, Adalberto D. and Sampaio, Marcos D.\",\n title = \"{Quantum estimation in neutrino oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"1610.05388\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"quant-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1142/s0219749917500459\",\n journal = \"Int. J. Quant. Inf.\",\n volume = \"15\",\n number = \"06\",\n pages = \"1750045\",\n year = \"2017\"\n}\n\n@article{Baker:1983tu,\n author = \"Baker, Steve and Cousins, Robert D.\",\n title = \"{Clarification of the Use of Chi Square and Likelihood Functions in Fits to Histograms}\",\n reportNumber = \"UCLA-HEP-83-3\",\n doi = \"10.1016/0167-5087(84)90016-4\",\n journal = \"Nucl. Instrum. Meth.\",\n volume = \"221\",\n pages = \"437--442\",\n year = \"1984\"\n}\n\n\n@article{DayaBay:2022orm,\n author = \"An, F. P. and others\",\n collaboration = \"Daya Bay\",\n title = \"{Precision Measurement of Reactor Antineutrino Oscillation at Kilometer-Scale Baselines by Daya Bay}\",\n eprint = \"2211.14988\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ex\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.161802\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"130\",\n number = \"16\",\n pages = \"161802\",\n year = \"2023\"\n}\n\n@article{Cowan:2010js,\n author = \"Cowan, Glen and Cranmer, Kyle and Gross, Eilam and Vitells, Ofer\",\n title = \"{Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics}\",\n eprint = \"1007.1727\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"physics.data-an\",\n doi = \"10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0\",\n journal = \"Eur. Phys. J. C\",\n volume = \"71\",\n pages = \"1554\",\n year = \"2011\",\n note = \"[Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 73, 2501 (2013)]\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Agarwalla:2021bzs,\n author = \"Agarwalla, Sanjib Kumar and Kundu, Ritam and Prakash, Suprabh and Singh, Masoom\",\n title = \"{A close look on 2-3 mixing angle with DUNE in light of current neutrino oscillation data}\",\n eprint = \"2111.11748\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"IP/BBSR/2021-11\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP03(2022)206\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"03\",\n pages = \"206\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{Ghosh:2015ena,\n author = \"Ghosh, Monojit and Ghoshal, Pomita and Goswami, Srubabati and Nath, Newton and Raut, Sushant K.\",\n title = \"{New look at the degeneracies in the neutrino oscillation parameters, and their resolution by T2K, NO$\\nu$A and ICAL}\",\n eprint = \"1504.06283\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.93.013013\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"93\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"013013\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Denton:2016wmg,\n author = \"Denton, Peter B. and Minakata, Hisakazu and Parke, Stephen J.\",\n title = \"{Compact Perturbative Expressions For Neutrino Oscillations in Matter}\",\n eprint = \"1604.08167\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-16-126-T, YACHAY-PUB-16-01-PN\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP06(2016)051\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"06\",\n pages = \"051\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n@article{Minakata:2015gra,\n author = \"Minakata, Hisakazu and Parke, Stephen J\",\n title = \"{Simple and Compact Expressions for Neutrino Oscillation Probabilities in Matter}\",\n eprint = \"1505.01826\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-15-196-T, NORDITA-2015-120, FERNILAB-PUB-15-196-T\",\n doi = \"10.1007/JHEP01(2016)180\",\n journal = \"JHEP\",\n volume = \"01\",\n pages = \"180\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Mikheyev1986,\n\tabstract = {For small mixing angles $\\theta$ the amplification of $\\nu$ oscillations in matter has the resonance form (resonance in neutrino energy or matter density). In the Sun resonance effect results in nontrivial changing (suppression) of $\\nu$-flux for a wide range of neutrino parameters $\\Delta$m2=(3{\\textperiodcentered}10−4{\\textdiv}10−8) (eV)2, sin22$\\theta$>10−4.},\n\tauthor = {Mikheyev, S. P. and Smirnov, A. Yu.},\n\tday = {01},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/BF02508049},\n\tissn = {0390-5551},\n\tjournal = {Il Nuovo Cimento C},\n\tmonth = {Jan},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tpages = {17--26},\n\ttitle = {Resonant amplification of $\\nu$ oscillations in matter and solar-neutrino spectroscopy},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02508049},\n\tvolume = {9},\n\tyear = {1986},\n\tBdsk-Url-1 = {https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02508049}}\n\n@article{Wolfenstein:1977ue,\n author = \"Wolfenstein, L.\",\n title = \"{Neutrino Oscillations in Matter}\",\n reportNumber = \"COO-3066-102\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.17.2369\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"17\",\n pages = \"2369--2374\",\n year = \"1978\"\n}\n\n\n@article{Mikheyev:1985zog,\n author = \"Mikheyev, S. P. and Smirnov, A. Yu.\",\n title = \"{Resonance Amplification of Oscillations in Matter and Spectroscopy of Solar Neutrinos}\",\n journal = \"Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.\",\n volume = \"42\",\n pages = \"913--917\",\n year = \"1985\"\n}\n\n@article{NOvA:2007rmc,\n author = \"Ayres, D. S. and others\",\n collaboration = \"NOvA\",\n title = \"{The NOvA Technical Design Report}\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-DESIGN-2007-01\",\n doi = \"10.2172/935497\",\n month = \"10\",\n year = \"2007\"\n}\n\n@article{NOvA:2021nfi,\n author = \"Acero, M. A. and others\",\n collaboration = \"NOvA\",\n title = \"{Improved measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters by the NOvA experiment}\",\n eprint = \"2108.08219\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ex\",\n reportNumber = \"FERMILAB-PUB-21-373-ND\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevD.106.032004\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. D\",\n volume = \"106\",\n number = \"3\",\n pages = \"032004\",\n year = \"2022\"\n}\n\n@article{DayaBay:2012fng,\n author = \"An, F. P. and others\",\n collaboration = \"Daya Bay\",\n title = \"{Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay}\",\n eprint = \"1203.1669\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ex\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.171803\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"108\",\n pages = \"171803\",\n year = \"2012\"\n}\n\n\n\n@article{Schliemann:2001rtw,\n author = \"Schliemann, John and Cirac, J. Ignacio and Ku{\\'s}, Marek and Lewenstein, Maciej and Loss, Daniel\",\n title = \"{Quantum correlations in two-fermion systems}\",\n eprint = \"quant-ph/0012094\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevA.64.022303\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. A\",\n volume = \"64\",\n number = \"2\",\n pages = \"022303\",\n year = \"2001\"\n}\n\n@article{Ignoti:2025rxr,\n author = \"Ignoti, Michela and Frugiuele, Claudia and Paris, Matteo G. A. and Genoni, Marco G.\",\n title = \"{Is the large uncertainty of $\\delta_{CP}$ fundamentally encoded in the neutrino quantum state?}\",\n eprint = \"2511.20148\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n month = \"11\",\n year = \"2025\"\n}\n\n@article{Frugiuele:2026yeq,\n author = \"Frugiuele, Claudia and Genoni, Marco G. and Ignoti, Michela and Paris, Matteo G. A.\",\n title = \"{Quantum Estimation Theory Limits in Neutrino Oscillation Experiments}\",\n eprint = \"2602.16534\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n month = \"2\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Chundawat:2026lcm,\n author = \"Chundawat, Neetu Raj Singh and Delgadillo, Luis A. and Li, Yu-Feng\",\n title = \"{Leptonic CP Phase Determination from Fisher Information in NO$\\nu$A and T2K}\",\n eprint = \"2605.30404\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n month = \"5\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Huang:2026bws,\n author = \"Huang, Jihong and Ohlsson, Tommy and Vihonen, Sampsa and Zhou, Shun\",\n title = \"{Revealing precision bounds on neutrino oscillation parameters with quantum estimation theory}\",\n eprint = \"2606.28275\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n month = \"6\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Yadav:2026mnw,\n author = \"Yadav, Bhavna and Subba, Amir and Shi, Yu\",\n title = \"{Multiparameter Quantum Estimation and Degeneracy Structure in Three-Flavor Neutrino Oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"2606.30222\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"hep-ph\",\n month = \"6\",\n year = \"2026\"\n}\n\n@article{Formaggio:2016cuh,\n author = \"Formaggio, J. A. and Kaiser, D. I. and Murskyj, M. M. and Weiss, T. E.\",\n title = \"{Violation of the Leggett-Garg Inequality in Neutrino Oscillations}\",\n eprint = \"1602.00041\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"quant-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.050402\",\n journal = \"Phys. Rev. Lett.\",\n volume = \"117\",\n number = \"5\",\n pages = \"050402\",\n year = \"2016\"\n}\n\n@article{Ettefaghi:2020otb,\n author = \"Ettefaghi, M. M. and Tabatabaei Lotfi, Z. S. and Ramezani Arani, R.\",\n title = \"{Quantum correlations in neutrino oscillation: Coherence and entanglement}\",\n eprint = \"2011.13010\",\n archivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n primaryClass = \"quant-ph\",\n doi = \"10.1209/0295-5075/132/31002\",\n journal = \"EPL\",\n volume = \"132\",\n number = \"3\",\n pages = \"31002\",\n year = \"2020\"\n}\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091197,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31997"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31997"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Seong-Gyu Yang"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Seong-Gyu Yang, Lucas Hedstr\\\"om, Jan Smrek, Ludvig Lizana"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Multifractal Scaling in Hi-C Maps"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"12 pages and 6 figures in main text, 13 pages and 9 figures in supporting information"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"cond-mat.stat-mech physics.bio-ph"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"The three-dimensional organization of the genome exhibits rich, scale-dependent structure, as revealed by both chromosome contact maps (e.g., Hi-C maps) and chromatin density measured by microscopy. Recent studies have reported multifractal scaling in these data. Yet, the origin of this scaling behavior remains unclear: existing efforts describe it through postulated models. Here, we show that the multifractal structure of Hi-C maps is a direct consequence of the power-law contact probability $P(s)$, which is itself an empirical observable measured from Hi-C maps. Starting from $P(s)$ with a single exponent $\\gamma$, we analytically derive the mass exponent $\\tau(q)$, which characterizes how the $q$-th moment of contact density scales with box size $l$ used to coarse-grain the genomic coordinate. This multifractal behavior reflects the geometric competition between intra- and inter-segment contacts. We find that the slope of $\\tau(q)$ at large $q$ is given by $2 -\\gamma$ when $\\gamma <1$, and by $1$ when $\\gamma \\geq 1$. We further show that this behavior is robust to noise and consistent across diverse organisms, indicating that it is a universal feature of chromatin organization. We extend our analysis into double-exponent $P(s)$, and show the $l$ dependence in multifractal behavior. Taken together, these results provide a physical explanation for multifractal scaling and establish a direct link between the multifractality in Hi-C maps and polymer contact statistics, with the large-$q$ slope of $\\tau(q)$ mapping onto a known polymer contact exponent."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:31:58 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:31:58 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Yang","Seong-Gyu",""],["Hedström","Lucas",""],["Smrek","Jan",""],["Lizana","Ludvig",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Yang\",\n \"Seong-Gyu\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Hedström\",\n \"Lucas\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Smrek\",\n \"Jan\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Lizana\",\n \"Ludvig\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: SI.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[aps,prl,reprint,superscriptaddress,amsmath,amssymb,longbibliography,onecolumn]{revtex4-2}\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\usepackage{graphicx} % Include figure files\n\\usepackage{dcolumn} % Align table columns on decimal point\n\\usepackage{bm} % Bold math\n\\usepackage{verbatim}\n\\usepackage{physics}\n\\usepackage{color,xcolor}\n\\usepackage{CJK}\n%---------------------------------------------\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\renewcommand{\\theequation}{S\\arabic{equation}}\n\\renewcommand{\\thefigure}{S\\arabic{figure}}\n%---------------------------------------------\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\begin{document}\n\\begin{CJK*}{UTF8}{}\n\\title{Supporting Information: Multifractal Scaling in Hi-C Maps}\n\n\\author{Seong-Gyu Yang \\CJKfamily{mj}{(양성규)}}\n\\email{seong-gyu.yang@umu.se}\n\\affiliation{Integrated Science Lab, Department of Physics, Ume{\\aa} University, SE-90187 Ume{\\aa}, Sweden}\n\\affiliation{Department of Physics and Institute of Basic Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea}\n \n\\author{Lucas Hedstr\\\"om}\n\\affiliation{Department of Physics, Ume{\\aa} University, SE-90187 Ume{\\aa}, Sweden}\n\n\\author{Jan Smrek}\n\\affiliation{Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria}\n\n\\author{Ludvig Lizana}\n\\email{ludvig.lizana@umu.se}\n\\affiliation{Integrated Science Lab, Department of Physics, Ume{\\aa} University, SE-90187 Ume{\\aa}, Sweden}\n \n\\date{\\today}\n\n\n\\maketitle\n\\end{CJK*}\n%--------------------------------------------\n\\section*{Further detailed derivation of $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$ and $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ for a single-exponent model}\nIn this Section, we provide the full derivation of the diagonal $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$ and the off-diagonal $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ contributions in the generalized partition function $Z(q,l)$ for a single-exponent model.\n\n\nWe begin by computing the mass $\\mu_l(f=0)$ in a box at $f=0$.\nFrom Eq.~5 in the main text together with the contact probability $P(s)$ in Eq.~2, we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:single_mu_zero}\n\\begin{split}\n\\mu_l (f=0) &= \\frac{l}{s_0} \\int_0^{l} P(s)\\, ds = \\frac{l}{s_0} \\left[ \\int_0^{s_0} C\\, ds + \\int_{s_0}^l C \\left( s/s_0 \\right)^{-\\gamma} ds \\right] = C l + C l s_0^{\\gamma-1} \\int_{s_0}^l s^{-\\gamma}\\, ds\\\\\n&= \\begin{cases}\nCl \\left[ 1 + \\ln(l/s_0) \\right], &\\gamma = 1,\\\\\n\\frac{Cl}{1-\\gamma} \\left[ \\left(l/s_0 \\right)^{1-\\gamma} - \\gamma \\right], &\\gamma \\neq 1,\n\\end{cases}\n\\ \\approx \\ \n\\begin{cases}\n\\frac{\\gamma C l}{\\gamma-1} \\sim l,&\\gamma > 1,\\\\\nCl \\left[ 1 + \\ln(l/s_0) \\right] \\sim l, &\\gamma = 1,\\\\\n\\frac{Cl}{1-\\gamma} \\left( l/s_0\\right)^{1-\\gamma} \\sim l^{2-\\gamma}, &\\gamma < 1.\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nThe mass $\\mu_l(f=0)$ scales as $l$ when $\\gamma\\geq 1$ and as $l^{2-\\gamma}$ when $\\gamma < 1$.\nThe exponent of $\\mu_l(f=0)$ is closely related to the bulk contact exponent $\\beta_b$, which is referred as $\\gamma_c$ in Ref.~\\cite{rosa2017beyond}, because $\\mu_l(f=0)$ counts the number of intra-segment contacts.\n\n\nSubstituting the results Eq.~\\ref{eq:single_mu_zero} into Eq.~6 in the main text, we obtain the diagonal contribution $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$ as\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:single_detailed_Zdiag}\n\\begin{split}\nZ_\\text{diag}(q,l) &= 4\\frac{L}{l} \\left[ \\mu_l (f=0)\\right]^q \n=\\begin{cases}\n4 C^q L l^{q-1}\\left[ 1 + \\ln(l/s_0) \\right]^q , &\\gamma = 1,\\\\\n\\frac{4 C^q }{(1 - \\gamma)^q} L l^{q-1}\\left[ \\left( l/s_0\\right)^{1-\\gamma} - \\gamma \\right]^q, &\\gamma\\neq 1,\n\\end{cases}\\\\\n&\\ \\approx\\ \n\\begin{cases}\n\\frac{4 \\gamma^q C^q }{(\\gamma-1)^q} L l^{q-1} \\sim l^{q-1} , &\\gamma>1,\\\\\n4 C^q L \\left[ 1 + \\ln(l/s_0) \\right]^q l^{q-1} \\sim l^{q-1}, &\\gamma = 1,\\\\\n\\frac{4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)}}{(1 - \\gamma)^q} L l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1} \\sim l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1}, &\\gamma<1.\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\n\n\n\n\n\n\nFor the off-diagonal contributions, we obtain the mass $\\mu_l(f\\neq 0)$ from Eq.~5 as\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:single_mu_nonzero}\n\\begin{split}\n\\mu_l(f\\neq0) &= \\frac{l}{s_0} \\int_{lf}^{l(f+1)} P(s)\\, ds = \\frac{l}{s_0} \\int_{lf}^{l(f+1)} C\\left( s/s_0 \\right)^{-\\gamma}\\, ds = C l s_0^{\\gamma-1} \\int_{lf}^{l(f+1)} s^{-\\gamma}\\ ds\\\\\n&=\\begin{cases}\nC l \\left[ \\ln(f+1) - \\ln(f) \\right], &\\gamma=1,\\\\\n\\frac{C l }{1-\\gamma} (l/s_0)^{1-\\gamma} \\left[(f+1)^{1-\\gamma} - f^{1-\\gamma} \\right], & \\gamma \\neq 1,\n\\end{cases} \\quad \\approx \\ C l (l/s_0)^{1-\\gamma} f^{-\\gamma}\\sim l^{2-\\gamma}.\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nIn the last line, we use approximations $(f+1)^{1-\\gamma} - f^{1-\\gamma} \\approx (1-\\gamma) f^{-\\gamma}$ and $\\ln(f+1) - \\ln(f) \\approx f^{-1}$.\nFigure~\\ref{fig:Approx} shows these approximations, and the difference decreases exponentially with $f$.\nThe scaling behavior of $\\mu_l(f\\neq0)$ is related to the surface contact exponent $\\beta_s$, because the mass counts the inter-segment contacts.\nThe surface contact exponent $\\beta_s$ is referred as surface exponent $\\beta$ in Refs.~\\cite{halverson2011molecular,smrek2013novel,halverson2014melt,rosa2017beyond}.\n\n\nNext, we calculate $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ using the result of Eq.~\\ref{eq:single_mu_nonzero} as\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{split}\nZ_\\text{off}(q,l) &= 4 \\int_1^{L/l} \\left( L/l -f \\right) \\left[ \\mu_l(f\\neq 0)\\right]^q df \\\\\n&= 4 C^q L s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)} l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1} \\int_1^{L/l} f^{-q\\gamma} df \\ - \\ 4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)} l^{q(2-\\gamma)} \\int_1^{L/l} f^{1-q\\gamma} df.\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nComparing these two terms, we find that the first term dominates by a factor of $L/l$.\nWe note that the box size $l$ lies in the regime $s_0 \\ll l \\ll L$.\nThe first term in $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ yields\n\\begin{equation}\n4C^q L s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)} l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1}\\int_1^{L/l} f^{-q\\gamma}df\n=\\begin{cases}\n4 C^q L s_0^{1-q} l^{2(q-1)}\\ln(L/l), &q\\gamma=1,\\\\\n\\frac{4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)}}{1-q\\gamma} L l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1} \\left[\\left(L/l \\right)^{1-q\\gamma} -1 \\right], &q\\gamma\\neq 1,\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nand the second term becomes\n\\begin{equation}\n4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)} l^{q(2-\\gamma)} \\int_1^{L/l} f^{1-q\\gamma}df\n=\\begin{cases}\n4 C^q s_0^{2-q} l^{2(q-1)} \\ln(L/l), & q\\gamma =2,\\\\\n\\frac{4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)}}{2-q\\gamma} l^{q(2-\\gamma)} \\left[\\left(L/l\\right)^{2-q\\gamma} -1\\right], &q\\gamma \\neq 2.\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\nThus, the off-diagonal term can be rewritten as\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:single_detailed_Zoff}\n\\begin{split}\nZ_\\text{off}(q,l)\n&=\\begin{cases}\n4 C^q s_0^{1-q} L l^{2(q-1)}\\ln(L/l), &q\\gamma=1,\\\\\n\\frac{4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)}}{1-q\\gamma} L l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1} \\left[\\left(L/l \\right)^{1-q\\gamma} -1 \\right], &q\\gamma\\neq 1,\n\\end{cases}\n\\quad -\\quad \\begin{cases}\n4 C^q s_0^{2-q} l^{2(q-1)} \\ln(L/l), & q\\gamma =2,\\\\\n\\frac{4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)}}{2-q\\gamma} l^{q(2-\\gamma)} \\left[ \\left(L/l\\right)^{2-q\\gamma} -1 \\right], &q\\gamma \\neq 2,\n\\end{cases}\\\\\n&\\approx\\begin{cases}\n\\frac{4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)}}{q\\gamma-1} L l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1} \\sim l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1}, &q\\gamma > 1,\\\\\n4 C^q s_0^{1-q} L l^{2(q-1)}\\ln(L/l) \\sim l^{2(q-1)}, &q\\gamma=1,\\\\\n\\frac{4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)}}{1-q\\gamma} L^{2-q\\gamma} l^{2(q-1)} \\sim l^{2(q-1)}, &q\\gamma < 1,\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nBy only considering the dominant contributions in $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$ and $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$, we obtain Eqs.~8 and 10 in the main text, which are plotted in Fig.~3A.\n\n\nIn Figs.~3B and 3C in the main text, the white dots represent the mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ obtained from $Z(q,l) = Z_\\text{diag}(q,l) + Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ using Eqs.~\\ref{eq:single_detailed_Zdiag} and \\ref{eq:single_detailed_Zoff}.\n\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n%--------------------------------------------\n\\section*{Detailed derivation of $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$ and $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ for a double-exponent model}\n%--------------------------------------------\nIn a double-exponent model, the contact probability $P(s)$ follows Eq.~11 with a sharp transition of exponents from $\\gamma$ to $\\eta$ at $s_T$, with $\\gamma<1$.\nFor the sake of generality, we allow $\\eta$ to be either smaller or larger than unity.\n\n\n\\subsection*{For large box sizes ($l > s_T$)}\nWhen the box size $l$ is larger than $s_T$, the results are qualitatively the same as in a single-exponent model, but the results have some additional terms and factors, and depend on $\\eta$.\nWe note that we assume $s_0 \\ll s_T < l \\ll L$ for large box size.\n\n\nIn the same way as before, we calculate the mass $\\mu_l(f=0)$ in a box at $f=0$, which yields\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:double_mu_zero}\n\\begin{split}\n\\mu_l(f=0) &= \\frac{l}{s_0} \\int_0^lP(s)\\, ds = \\frac{l}{s_0}\\left[ \\int_0^{s_0}C\\,ds + \\int_{s_0}^{s_T}C\\left(s/s_0\\right)^{-\\gamma}ds + \\int_{s_T}^l C\\left( s_T/s_0\\right)^{-\\gamma} \\left( s/s_T \\right)^{-\\eta} ds\\right]\\\\\n&=C l + C l s_0^{\\gamma-1}\\int_{s_0}^{s_T} s^{-\\gamma}\\,ds + C l \\left( s_T/s_0\\right)^{1-\\gamma}s_T^{\\eta-1} \\int_{s_T}^l s^{-\\eta}\\,ds\\\\\n&= \\begin{cases}\nC l \\left[ - \\frac{\\gamma}{1-\\gamma} + \\frac{1}{1-\\gamma} \\left( s_T/s_0\\right)^{1-\\gamma} + \\left(s_T/s_0\\right)^{1-\\gamma}\\ln(l/s_T) \\right], &\\eta=1,\\\\\nC l \\left[ -\\frac{\\gamma}{1-\\gamma} - \\frac{\\eta-\\gamma}{(1-\\gamma)(1-\\eta)} \\left( s_T/s_0\\right)^{1-\\gamma} + \\frac{1}{1-\\eta}\\left( s_T/s_0\\right)^{1-\\gamma}\\left(l/s_T\\right)^{1-\\eta} \\right], &\\eta \\neq 1,\n\\end{cases}\\\\\n&\\approx \\begin{cases}\n\\frac{(\\eta - \\gamma) C l}{(1-\\gamma)(\\eta-1)} \\left( s_T/s_0 \\right)^{1-\\gamma} \\sim l, &\\eta > 1,\\\\\n\\frac{Cl}{1-\\gamma} \\left(s_T/s_0\\right)^{1-\\gamma} \\left[ 1 + (1-\\gamma)\\ln(l/s_T) \\right] \\sim l, &\\eta=1,\\\\\n\\frac{Cl}{1-\\eta} \\left( s_T/s_0\\right)^{1-\\gamma} \\left( l/s_T\\right)^{1-\\eta} \\sim l^{2-\\eta}, &\\eta < 1.\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nIn this study, we assume that $\\gamma <1$, thus we ignore the case when $\\gamma\\geq1$ in the second term.\nThe dominant term in the diagonal mass $\\mu_l(f=0)$ scales as $l$ when $\\eta\\geq1$, and as $l^{2-\\eta}$ when $\\eta <1$, which matches the scaling behavior in Eq.~\\ref{eq:single_mu_zero} upon replacing $\\gamma$ with $\\eta$.\n\n\nEquation~\\ref{eq:double_mu_zero} yields $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:double_detailed_Zdiag}\n\\begin{split}\nZ_\\text{diag}(q,l) &= 4 \\frac{L}{l} \\left[ \\mu_l(f=0)\\right]^q = \n\\begin{cases}\n\\frac{4 C^q}{(1-\\gamma)^q} L l^{q-1}\\left[-\\gamma + \\left(s_T/s_0\\right)^{1-\\gamma} + \\left( s_T/s_0\\right)^{-\\gamma}\\ln(l/s_T)\\right]^q, &\\eta=1,\\\\\n4 C^q L l^{q-1}\\left[ \\frac{\\gamma}{\\gamma-1} + \\frac{\\eta-\\gamma}{(1-\\gamma)(\\eta-1)} \\left( s_T/s_0\\right)^{1-\\gamma} + \\frac{1}{1-\\eta} \\left(s_T/s_0\\right)^{-\\gamma}\\left(l/s_T\\right)^{1-\\eta} \\right]^q, &\\eta \\neq 1,\n\\end{cases}\\\\\n&\\approx\n\\begin{cases}\n\\frac{4(\\eta-\\gamma)^q C^q}{(1-\\gamma)^q(\\eta-1)^q} \\left(s_T/s_0\\right)^{q(1-\\gamma)} L l^{q-1}\\sim l^{q-1}, &\\eta > 1,\\\\\n\\frac{4C^q}{(1-\\gamma)^q} \\left(s_T/s_0\\right)^{q(1-\\gamma)} L l^{q-1}\\left[ 1 + (1-\\gamma) \\ln (l/s_T) \\right] \\sim l^{q-1}, &\\eta = 1,\\\\\n\\frac{4 C^q s_T^{q(\\eta-1)}}{(1-\\eta)^q} \\left(s_T/s_0\\right)^{q(1-\\gamma)} L l^{q(2-\\eta)-1} \\sim l^{q(2-\\eta)-1}, &\\eta < 1,\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nwhich exhibits the same scaling behavior in $l$, but replacing $\\gamma$ with $\\eta$ in Eq.~\\ref{eq:single_detailed_Zdiag}.\n\n\n\nThe off-diagonal mass $\\mu_l(f\\neq 0)$ takes a form analogous to Eq.~\\ref{eq:single_mu_nonzero}:\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:double_mu_nonzero}\n\\begin{split}\n\\mu_l(f\\neq 0) &= \\frac{l}{s_0} \\int_{lf}^{l(f+1)} P(s)ds = C l \\left( s_T/s_0\\right)^{1-\\gamma} s_T^{\\eta-1} \\int_{lf}^{l(f+1)} s^{-\\eta}ds \\\\\n&\\approx C l \\left(s_T/s_0\\right)^{1-\\gamma} (l/s_T)^{1-\\eta} f^{-\\eta} \\sim l^{2-\\eta}.\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nTo obtain Eq.~\\ref{eq:double_mu_nonzero}, we also use the same approximations that we used to calculate Eq.~\\ref{eq:single_mu_nonzero}.\nUsing this result, the off-diagonal contribution $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ is rewritten as\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:double_detailed_Zoff}\n\\begin{split}\nZ_\\text{off}(q,l) &= 4 \\int_1^{L/l} \\left(L/l - f \\right) \\left[\\mu_l(f\\neq 0)\\right]^q \\,df\\\\\n&= 4 C^q s_T^{q(\\eta-1)} \\left( s_T/s_0\\right)^{q(1-\\gamma)} L l^{q(2-\\eta)-1}\\int_1^{L/l}f^{-q\\eta}\\,df \\quad -\\quad 4 C^q s_T^{q(\\eta-1)} \\left(s_T/s_0\\right)^{q(1-\\gamma)} l^{q(2-\\eta)}\\int_1^{L/l}f^{1-q\\eta}\\,df\\\\\n&=\n\\begin{cases}\n4C^q s_T^{1-q} \\left(s_T/s_0\\right)^{q(1-\\gamma)} L l ^{2(q-1)} \\ln(L/l), &q\\eta =1,\\\\\n\\frac{4C^q s_T^{q(\\eta-1)}}{1-q\\eta} \\left(s_T/s_0\\right)^{q(1-\\gamma)} L l ^{q(2-\\eta)-1} \\left[\\left(L/l\\right)^{1-q\\eta} - 1\\right], &q\\eta \\neq 1,\n\\end{cases}\\\\\n&\\quad - \\begin{cases}\n4 C^q s_T^{2-q} \\left( s_T/s_0 \\right)^{q(1-\\gamma)} l^{2(q-2)} \\ln(L/l), &q\\eta = 2,\\\\\n\\frac{4 C^q s_T^{q(\\eta-1)}}{2-q\\eta}\\left(s_T/s_0\\right)^{q(1-\\gamma)} l^{q(2-\\eta)}\\left[ \\left(L/l\\right)^{2-q\\eta}-1\\right], &q\\eta \\neq 2,\n\\end{cases}\\\\\n&\\approx\n\\begin{cases}\n\\frac{4C^q s_T^{q(\\eta-1)}}{q\\eta-1} \\left( s_T/s_0 \\right)^{q(1-\\gamma)} L l^{q(2-\\eta)-1} \\sim l^{q(2-\\eta)-1} , &q\\eta>1,\\\\\n4C^q s_T^{1-q} \\left(s_T/s_0\\right)^{q(1-\\gamma)} L l ^{2(q-1)} \\ln(L/l) \\sim l^{2(q-1)}, &q\\eta=1,\\\\\n\\frac{4C^q s_T^{q(\\eta-1)}}{1-q\\eta} \\left( s_T/s_0 \\right)^{q(1-\\gamma)} L^{2-q\\eta} l^{2(q-1)} \\sim l^{2(q-1)} , &q\\eta<1.\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nThis result also exhibits the same scaling behavior as Eq.~\\ref{eq:single_detailed_Zoff}, but with additional factors and replacing $\\gamma$ with $\\eta$.\nConsidering the dominant term in $Z(q,l) = Z_\\text{diag}(q,l) + Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$, Fig.~6C depicts the four regimes of $\\tau(q)$.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\\subsection*{For small box sizes ($l < s_T$)}\n\nIn the small-$l$ regime, we assume $s_0 \\ll l < s_T \\ll L$.\nIn this case, the diagonal mass $\\mu_l(f=0)$ has the same form as in Eq.~\\ref{eq:single_mu_zero} for $\\gamma <1$, and the resulting diagonal $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$ follows Eq.~\\ref{eq:single_detailed_Zdiag}.\n\n\n\nThe off-diagonal contribution, in contrast, differs from the previous results.\nWe distinguish three cases depending on the position of the box relative to the transition scale $s_T$:\nthe first, where the box covers only $s < s_T$ ($f < f_c$ with $f_c = \\lfloor s_T/l \\rfloor$), so that $P(s)$ decays only with $\\gamma$;\nthe second, where the box covers only $s > s_T$ ($f > f_c$), so that $P(s)$ decays only with $\\eta$;\nand the third, where the box contains the transition point $s_T$ ($f = f_c$) thus both exponents contribute.\nIn the continuum approximation, the single point $f=f_c$ has zero measure, so we ignore its contribution.\nFurthermore, since $l < s_T$ in the small-$l$ regime, we have $s_T/l > 1$ and approximate $f_c = \\lfloor s_T/l\\rfloor \\approx s_T/l$.\nThe relative error of this approximation is $O(l/s_T)$, which does not affect the leading-order scaling.\n\n\n\n\nBecause $P(s)$ decays only with $\\gamma$ in the first region ($f<f_c)$, the mass in this region $\\mu_l(f<f_c)$ follows the same form as in Eq.~\\ref{eq:single_mu_nonzero}, and in the second region ($f>f_c$), the mass $\\mu_l(f>f_c)$ takes the same form as in Eq.~\\ref{eq:double_mu_nonzero}.\nTherefore, using Eqs.~\\ref{eq:single_mu_nonzero} and \\ref{eq:double_mu_nonzero}, we compute $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ as\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:double_detail_Zoff}\n\\begin{split}\nZ_\\text{off}(q,l) &= 4\\int_1^{L/l}\\left(L/l - f\\right) \\left[ \\mu_l(f\\neq0)\\right]^qdf\\\\\n&\\approx 4 \\int_1^{s_T/l} \\left(L/l - f\\right) \\left[ \\mu_l(f<f_c)\\right]^qdf \\ +\\ 4\\int_{s_T/l}^{L/l}\\left(L/l - f\\right) \\left[ \\mu_l(f>f_c)\\right]^qdf\\\\\n& = 4C^q l^q \\left( l/s_0 \\right)^{q(1-\\gamma)} \\int_1^{s_T/l}\\left(L/l-f\\right)f^{-q\\gamma}df \\ +\\ 4 C^q l^q \\left(s_T/s_0\\right)^{q(1-\\gamma)} \\left(l/s_T\\right)^{q(1-\\eta)}\\int_{s_T/l}^{L/l}\\left(L/l-f\\right) f^{-q\\eta}df\\\\\n& = 4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)} L l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1} \\int_1^{s_T/l} f^{-q\\gamma}df\n\\ -\\ 4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)} l^{q(2-\\gamma)} \\int_1^{s_T/l} f^{1-q\\gamma} df\\\\\n&\\ +4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)} s_T^{q(\\eta-\\gamma)} L l^{q(2-\\eta)-1} \\int_{s_T/l}^{L/l} f^{-q\\eta}df\n\\ -\\ 4C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)} s_T^{q(\\eta-\\gamma)} l^{q(2-\\eta)}\\int_{s_T/l}^{L/l} f^{1-q\\eta}df\\\\\n&=\\begin{cases}\n4 C^q s_0^{1-q} L l^{2(q-1)} \\ln(s_T/l), &q\\gamma = 1,\\\\\n\\frac{4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)}}{1-q\\gamma} L l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1}\\left[ \\left(s_T/l\\right)^{1-q\\gamma} - 1 \\right] , &q\\gamma \\neq 1,\n\\end{cases}\\\\ \n&\\quad -\n\\begin{cases}\n4 C^q s_0^{2-q} l^{2(q-1)} \\ln (s_T/l), &q\\gamma = 2,\\\\\n\\frac{4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)}}{2-q\\gamma} l^{q(2-\\gamma)} \\left[\\left( s_T/l \\right)^{2-q\\gamma} - 1 \\right], &q\\gamma \\neq 2,\n\\end{cases} \\\\\n&\\ +\n\\begin{cases}\n4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)} s_T^{1-q\\gamma} L l^{2(q-1)} \\ln(L/s_T), &q\\eta = 1,\\\\\n\\frac{4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)} s_T^{1-q\\gamma}}{1-q\\eta} L l^{2(q-1)}\\left[\\left(L/s_T\\right)^{1-q\\eta} - 1 \\right], &q\\eta \\neq 1,\n\\end{cases}\\\\\n&\\quad -\n\\begin{cases}\n4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)} s_T^{2-q\\gamma} l^{2(q-1)} \\ln(L/s_T), &q\\eta = 2,\\\\\n\\frac{4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)} s_T^{2-q\\gamma}}{2-q\\eta} l^{2(q-1)} \\left[ \\left(L/s_T \\right)^{2-q\\eta} - 1\\right], &q\\eta \\neq 2,\n\\end{cases}\\\\\n& \\approx\n\\begin{cases}\n\\frac{4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)}}{q\\gamma-1} L l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1} \\sim l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1}, &q\\gamma > 1,\\\\\n4 C^q s_0^{1-q} L l^{2(q-1)} \\ln(s_T/l) \\sim l^{2(q-1)}, &q\\gamma = 1,\\\\\n\\frac{4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)} s_T^{1-q\\gamma} }{1-q\\gamma} L l^{2(q-1)} \\sim l^{2(q-1)}, &q\\gamma < 1.\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nInterestingly, the dominant term in $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ in Eq.~\\ref{eq:double_detail_Zoff} depends on $\\gamma$ rather than $\\eta$.\n\n\n\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\\bibliographystyle{apsrev4-2}\n%apsrev4-2.bst 2019-01-14 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrev4-1.bst\n%Control: key (0)\n%Control: author (72) initials jnrlst\n%Control: editor formatted (1) identically to author\n%Control: production of article title (-1) disabled\n%Control: page (0) single\n%Control: year (1) truncated\n%Control: production of eprint (0) enabled\n\\begin{thebibliography}{4}%\n\\makeatletter\n\\providecommand \\@ifxundefined [1]{%\n \\@ifx{#1\\undefined}\n}%\n\\providecommand \\@ifnum [1]{%\n \\ifnum #1\\expandafter \\@firstoftwo\n \\else \\expandafter \\@secondoftwo\n \\fi\n}%\n\\providecommand \\@ifx [1]{%\n \\ifx #1\\expandafter \\@firstoftwo\n \\else \\expandafter \\@secondoftwo\n \\fi\n}%\n\\providecommand \\natexlab [1]{#1}%\n\\providecommand \\enquote [1]{``#1''}%\n\\providecommand \\bibnamefont [1]{#1}%\n\\providecommand \\bibfnamefont [1]{#1}%\n\\providecommand \\citenamefont [1]{#1}%\n\\providecommand \\href@noop [0]{\\@secondoftwo}%\n\\providecommand \\href [0]{\\begingroup \\@sanitize@url \\@href}%\n\\providecommand \\@href[1]{\\@@startlink{#1}\\@@href}%\n\\providecommand \\@@href[1]{\\endgroup#1\\@@endlink}%\n\\providecommand \\@sanitize@url [0]{\\catcode `\\\\12\\catcode `\\$12\\catcode\n `\\&12\\catcode `\\#12\\catcode `\\^12\\catcode `\\_12\\catcode `\\%12\\relax}%\n\\providecommand \\@@startlink[1]{}%\n\\providecommand \\@@endlink[0]{}%\n\\providecommand \\url [0]{\\begingroup\\@sanitize@url \\@url }%\n\\providecommand \\@url [1]{\\endgroup\\@href {#1}{\\urlprefix }}%\n\\providecommand \\urlprefix [0]{URL }%\n\\providecommand \\Eprint [0]{\\href }%\n\\providecommand \\doibase [0]{https://doi.org/}%\n\\providecommand \\selectlanguage [0]{\\@gobble}%\n\\providecommand \\bibinfo [0]{\\@secondoftwo}%\n\\providecommand \\bibfield [0]{\\@secondoftwo}%\n\\providecommand \\translation [1]{[#1]}%\n\\providecommand \\BibitemOpen [0]{}%\n\\providecommand \\bibitemStop [0]{}%\n\\providecommand \\bibitemNoStop [0]{.\\EOS\\space}%\n\\providecommand \\EOS [0]{\\spacefactor3000\\relax}%\n\\providecommand \\BibitemShut [1]{\\csname bibitem#1\\endcsname}%\n\\let\\auto@bib@innerbib\\@empty\n%</preamble>\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Rosa}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Everaers}(2017)}]{rosa2017beyond}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Rosa}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Everaers}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Physical Review E}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {95}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages}\n {012117} (\\bibinfo {year} {2017})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Halverson}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2011)\\citenamefont\n {Halverson}, \\citenamefont {Lee}, \\citenamefont {Grest}, \\citenamefont\n {Grosberg},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Kremer}}]{halverson2011molecular}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Halverson}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.~B.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Lee}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Grest}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~Y.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Grosberg}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.}~\\bibnamefont {Kremer}},\\ }\\href@noop {}\n {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {The Journal of chemical physics}\\\n }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {134}} (\\bibinfo {year} {2011})}\\BibitemShut\n {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Smrek}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Grosberg}(2013)}]{smrek2013novel}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Smrek}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~Y.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Grosberg}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n {volume} {392}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {6375} (\\bibinfo {year}\n {2013})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Halverson}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2014)\\citenamefont\n {Halverson}, \\citenamefont {Smrek}, \\citenamefont {Kremer},\\ and\\\n \\citenamefont {Grosberg}}]{halverson2014melt}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Halverson}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Smrek}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.}~\\bibnamefont {Kremer}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~Y.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Grosberg}},\\ }\\href@noop {}\n {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Rep. Prog. Phys.}\\ }\\textbf\n {\\bibinfo {volume} {77}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {022601} (\\bibinfo {year}\n {2014})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\end{thebibliography}%\n\n\n\n\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\\newpage\n\\begin{figure}\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{SI_MFS_Human_Mouse.pdf}\n\\caption{\n(A, B, E, and F) Mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ and (C, D, G, and H) singularity spectrum $f(\\alpha)$ for (A--D) human and (E--H) mouse Chr~1 Hi-C maps.\nSingularity spectrum $f(\\alpha)$ varies smoothly with $\\alpha$, which implies that the system exhibits the multifractal behavior.\n}\\label{fig:MFS_Human_Mouse}\n\\end{figure}\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\\newpage\n\\begin{figure}\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{SI_Human1.pdf}\n\\caption{\nContact probability $P(s)$ and multifractal analysis results for small and large $l$ for human Chr~2--Chr~13.\n}\\label{fig:Human_1}\n\\end{figure}\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\\newpage\n\\begin{figure}\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{SI_Human2.pdf}\n\\caption{\nContact probability $P(s)$ and multifractal analysis results for small and large $l$ for human Chr~14--Chr~X.\n}\\label{fig:Human_2}\n\\end{figure}\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\n\n\n\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\\newpage\n\\begin{figure}\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{SI_Mouse1.pdf}\n\\caption{\nContact probability $P(s)$ and multifractal analysis results for small and large $l$ for mouse Chr~2--Chr~13.\n}\\label{fig:Mouse_1}\n\\end{figure}\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\\newpage\n\\begin{figure}\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{SI_Mouse2.pdf}\n\\caption{\nContact probability $P(s)$ and multifractal analysis results for small and large $l$ for mouse Chr~14--Chr~X.\n}\\label{fig:Mouse_2}\n\\end{figure}\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n%--------------------------------------------\n\\newpage\n\\begin{figure}\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{SI_Approx.pdf}\n\\caption{\nApproximations validation.\n(A--D) We validate $(f+1)^{1-\\gamma}-f^{1-\\gamma}\\approx (1-\\gamma)f^{-\\gamma}$ for (A and B) $\\gamma=0.5$ and for (C and D) $\\gamma=1.5$.\n(E and F) Validation for $\\ln(f+1) - \\ln(f) \\approx f^{-1}$.\n(B, D, and F) As $f$ increase, the difference between original and approximated expressions decreases.\n}\\label{fig:Approx}\n\\end{figure}\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\\newpage\n\\begin{figure}\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{SI_MFS_One.pdf}\n\\caption{\n(A and B) Mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ and (C and D) singularity spectrum $f(\\alpha)$ for a single-exponent model.\nThe contact exponent $\\gamma$ is (A and C) $\\gamma=0.5$ and (B and D) $\\gamma=1.5$.\n}\\label{fig:MFS_Single}\n\\end{figure}\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\n\n\n\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\\newpage\n\\begin{figure}\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{SI_MFS_Two.pdf}\n\\caption{\n(A, B and C) Mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ and (D, E and F) singularity spectrum $f(\\alpha)$ for a double-exponent model.\nThe contact exponent $\\eta$ at large-$s$ regime is (A and D) $\\eta=0.85$ and (B, C, E, and F) $\\eta=1.5$.\nThe other contact exponent $\\gamma$ is set to $\\gamma=0.5$.\n}\\label{fig:MFS_Double}\n\\end{figure}\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\\newpage\n\\begin{figure}\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\textwidth]{SI_DiffTau.pdf}\n\\caption{\nComparison between the mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ measured by ratio $\\tau_r(q) = \\ln Z(q,l) / \\ln l$ and by log derivative $\\tau_d(q) = d\\ln Z(q,l) / d\\ln l$ for (A and B) $\\gamma=0.5$ and (C and D) $\\gamma=1.5$.\n(A and C) Log-derivative result $\\tau_d(q)$ shows more stable behavior than ratio result $\\tau_r(q)$ for $l$.\n(B and D) The difference $\\tau_d(q) - \\tau_r(q)$ scales as $1/\\ln l$ as we expected.\nWe set $q=2$.\n}\\label{fig:DiffTau}\n\\end{figure}\n\n%--------------------------------------------\n\n\n\n\n\n\\end{document}\n\n================================================\nFILE: arXiv.tex\n================================================\n\\documentclass[aps,prl,reprint,superscriptaddress,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4-2}\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\usepackage{graphicx} % Include figure files\n\\usepackage{dcolumn} % Align table columns on decimal point\n\\usepackage{bm} % Bold math\n\\usepackage{verbatim}\n\\usepackage{physics}\n\\usepackage{orcidlink}\n\\usepackage{color,xcolor}\n\\usepackage{CJK}\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\graphicspath{{./Figs/}}\n\\newcommand{\\SI}{\\textit{SI}}\n%\n%---------------------------------------------\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\begin{document}\n\\begin{CJK*}{UTF8}{}\n\\title{Multifractal Scaling in Hi-C Maps}\n\n\\author{Seong-Gyu Yang \\CJKfamily{mj}{(양성규)}\\orcidlink{0000-0003-0583-0006}}\n\\email{seong-gyu.yang@umu.se}\n\\affiliation{Integrated Science Lab, Department of Physics, Ume{\\aa} University, SE-90187 Ume{\\aa}, Sweden}\n\\affiliation{Department of Physics and Institute of Basic Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea}\n \n\\author{Lucas Hedstr\\\"om\\orcidlink{0000-0002-3315-0633}}\n\\affiliation{Department of Physics, Ume{\\aa} University, SE-90187 Ume{\\aa}, Sweden}\n\n\\author{Jan Smrek\\orcidlink{0000-0003-1764-9298}}\n\\affiliation{Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria}\n\n\\author{Ludvig Lizana\\orcidlink{0000-0003-3174-8145}}\n\\email{ludvig.lizana@umu.se}\n\\affiliation{Integrated Science Lab, Department of Physics, Ume{\\aa} University, SE-90187 Ume{\\aa}, Sweden}\n \n\\date{\\today}\n \n\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\begin{abstract}\n%\nThe three-dimensional organization of the genome exhibits rich, scale-dependent structure, as revealed by both chromosome contact maps (e.g., Hi-C maps) and chromatin density measured by microscopy.\nRecent studies have reported multifractal scaling in these data.\nYet, the origin of this scaling behavior remains unclear: existing efforts describe it through postulated models.\nHere, we show that the multifractal structure of Hi-C maps is a direct consequence of the power-law contact probability $P(s)$, which is itself an empirical observable measured from Hi-C maps.\nStarting from $P(s)$ with a single exponent $\\gamma$, we analytically derive the mass exponent $\\tau(q)$, which characterizes how the $q$-th moment of contact density scales with box size $l$ used to coarse-grain the genomic coordinate.\nThis multifractal behavior reflects the geometric competition between intra- and inter-segment contacts.\nWe find that the slope of $\\tau(q)$ at large $q$ is given by $2 -\\gamma$ when $\\gamma <1$, and by $1$ when $\\gamma \\geq 1$.\nWe further show that this behavior is robust to noise and consistent across diverse organisms, indicating that it is a universal feature of chromatin organization.\nWe extend our analysis into double-exponent $P(s)$, and show the $l$ dependence in multifractal behavior.\nTaken together, these results provide a physical explanation for multifractal scaling and establish a direct link between the multifractality in Hi-C maps and polymer contact statistics, with the large-$q$ slope of $\\tau(q)$ mapping onto a known polymer contact exponent.\n%\n\\end{abstract}\n%---------------------------------------------\n\n\n\\maketitle\n\\end{CJK*}\n\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\section*{Introduction}\n%\n%\n\nThe three-dimensional organization of chromatin physically constrains gene regulation and nuclear architecture.\nThis organization can now be probed directly with modern experimental techniques.\nChromosome conformation capture methods, especially Hi-C, enable genome-wide measurement of chromatin contacts~\\cite{lieberman2009comprehensive,rao20143d}, while multipoint FISH images provide complementary measurements of chromosome conformations in three-dimensional space~\\cite{wang2016spatial,bintu2018super}.\nTogether, these approaches reveal structural features such as loops, topologically associated domains (TADs)~\\cite{takei2021integrated,takaki2025active}, and chromosomal compartments~\\cite{bintu2018super,boettiger2016super,rao2017cohesin,schwarzer2017two,kim2017dynamic,hsieh2022enhancer}.\n\n\n%\nBeyond these structures, these experimental approaches also reveal continuous scaling behavior across genomic distances.\nFor example, Hi-C experiments show that the contact probability between two loci at genomic distance $s$ follows $P(s) \\sim s^{-\\gamma}$ with $\\gamma \\approx 1$ for $s>1$~Mb~\\cite{lieberman2009comprehensive}.\nThis result has made contact scaling a central observable for understanding chromatin folding.\n\n\nPolymer physics provides a natural framework for interpreting these scaling laws.\nEquilibrium models such as the Gaussian chain or self-avoiding walk predict $P(s) \\sim s^{-3/2}$ or $s^{-1.76}$, respectively~\\cite{de1979scaling,rubinstein2003polymer}, both inconsistent with the observed $\\gamma\\approx 1$~\\cite{mirny2011fractal}.\nThis value of $\\gamma$ instead points to non-equilibrium or topologically constrained conformations, captured by the crumpled (fractal) globule, characterized by hierarchical self-similar folding without entanglement~\\cite{grosberg1993crumpled,mirny2011fractal}.\nRegardless of the microscopic mechanism, polymer models share a common form: a power-law contact probability $P(s) \\sim s^{-\\gamma}$, with the exponent $\\gamma$ depending on the model.\nThis convergence has made $P(s)$ a benchmark observable for evaluating models of chromatin folding.\n\n\n\n\n%\nMultifractal analysis approaches the same contact map data from a different direction.\nIt characterizes the heterogeneous spatial distribution of local scaling behaviors through a spectrum of exponents~\\cite{halsey1986fractal,ott2002chaos,salat2017multifractal}, rather than describing how $P(s)$ varies with $s$, where multiple slopes are observed empirically~\\cite{lieberman2009comprehensive,sanborn2015chromatin,chan2024activity}.\nOriginally developed to describe intermittent energy dissipation in turbulent flows~\\cite{frisch1980fully,benzi1984multifractal,she1994universal,balyga1995interpretation,paladin1987degrees,paladin1987anomalous,chhabra1989direct,chhabra1989direct2}, it is now widely used to characterize heterogeneous scaling in diverse systems, including chaotic systems~\\cite{ott2002chaos}, brain activity~\\cite{wink2008monofractal}, financial markets~\\cite{calvet2002multifractality,jiang2019multifractal,jung2020fractality}, and complex networks~\\cite{murcio2015multifractal,liu2017fractal}.\nWhen applied to Hi-C maps, it revealed bifractal behavior~\\cite{pigolotti2020bifractal}. \nSuch multifractal signatures also appear in microscopy images of chromatin density~\\cite{LEE2025}, indicating that multifractal scaling is not tied to a single technique. \nMultifractal formalism treats Hi-C maps as geometric objects, much like velocity increments or dissipation fields in turbulence, and analyzes them without reference to polymer physics. \nAs a result, the connection between multifractal behavior and polymer scaling remains unclear.\nFor example, an existing attempt reproduces the multifractal scaling using the hierarchical domain model~\\cite{pigolotti2020bifractal}, but it does not explain why or how a polymer with power-law-decaying contacts should exhibit such behavior.\n\n\n\n\n%\nHere, we connect these two descriptions, polymer physics and multifractal formalism.\nThe key input is the contact probability $P(s)$, which is directly measurable from Hi-C maps and observed to decay as a power law across a broad range of genomic distances.\nStarting from this empirical observation, we derive the mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ analytically, without assuming any specific polymer conformation.\nThe only polymer input is this contact probability.\nWe show that multifractal behavior emerges in Hi-C maps because the two-dimensional organization of the contact map distinguishes contacts near and far from the diagonal, encoding different polymer interactions, namely intra- and inter-segment contacts, whose relative weight changes with the moment order $q$.\nThis geometric competition alone is sufficient to produce multifractal behavior even from a single power law $P(s)$.\nWe find that the slope of $\\tau(q)$ at large $q$ equals $2 - \\gamma$ when $\\gamma < 1$, and $1$ when $\\gamma \\geq 1$.\nSpecifically, this slope of $\\tau(q)$, $2-\\gamma$, maps onto a polymer contact exponent: the bulk contact exponent $\\beta_b$, governing intra-segment contacts.\nThis correspondence means that $\\tau(q)$, which is directly measurable from Hi-C maps, provides a new route to extract polymer contact exponent $\\beta_b$ that is encoded in $P(s)$ without requiring structural modeling of the polymer.\n\n\n\n%\nMoreover, our $\\tau(q)$ analytically explains the previously reported bifractal behavior~\\cite{pigolotti2020bifractal}.\nThe two asymptotic linear regimes observed in empirical Hi-C maps emerge naturally from the competition between intra- and inter-segment contacts.\nCrucially, however, these two regimes are not truly distinct.\nThey are necessarily connected by a smooth crossover, revealing that the underlying structure is multifractal rather than bifractal.\nWe test these predictions using Hi-C data from human and mouse cells~\\cite{rao20143d} and extend the analysis across multiple species, finding consistent multifractal behavior across diverse organisms.\nMore broadly, our results demonstrate that $\\tau(q)$ carries direct geometric information about the underlying polymer, opening a new window into chromatin organization beyond traditional contact scaling analysis.\n\n\n%\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\section*{Results}\n%---------------------------------------------\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\subsection*{Hi-C Maps from Human and Mouse show Multifractal Behavior}\n%\n\n\n%\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{01_Human_Mouse.pdf}\n\\caption{\nMultifractal analysis results for human (GM12878) and mouse (CH12.LX) chromosome (Chr)~1 Hi-C maps at $25$~kb resolution.\n(A and B) Representative parts of the Hi-C maps for (A) human and (B) mouse Chr~1, respectively.\nThe contact frequencies are KR-normalized and displayed on a logarithmic scale.\nThe white bracket denotes a $1$~Mb scale.\n(C and D) The mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ for (C) human and (D) mouse Chr~1 Hi-C maps, respectively, calculated at a box size $l\\approx 4$~Mb.\nThe slope of $\\tau(q)$ varies smoothly as $q$ increases, indicating multifractal behavior.\nThe gray lines show theoretical predictions in the large- and small-$q$ limits, $\\tau(q) = q-1$ and $\\tau(q) = 2(q-1)$, respectively.\n}\\label{fig:Empirical}\n\\end{figure}\n%\n\n\n\nWe analyze the multifractal behavior of two empirical Hi-C maps ($25$~kb resolution).\nOne dataset is from human B-lymphoblastoid cells (GM12878), and the other is from mouse B-lymphoblasts (CH12.LX)~\\cite{rao20143d}.\nAfter data preprocessing (see \\textit{Materials and Methods}), we perform a multifractal analysis by covering the Hi-C maps with boxes of size $l$ and calculating the probability mass $\\mu_l$ for each box.\nWe refer to $\\mu_l$ as ``mass'' throughout this paper.\nTo obtain the generalized partition function $Z(q,l)$, we raise $\\mu_l$ to the power $q$ and sum over all boxes, i.e., $Z(q,l) = \\sum_\\text{box} \\mu^q_l$.\nAs a function of the box size $l$, the generalized partition function scales as $Z(q,l) \\sim l^{\\tau(q)}$, where the mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ captures how different moments of the distribution of $\\mu_l$ change with $l$.\nA nonlinear $\\tau(q)$ is a hallmark of multifractal behavior, often read as distinct scaling in dense versus sparse regions: for Hi-C, we show below that this nonlinearity instead follows from $P(s)$ and the map geometry alone.\nDetails of the multifractal formalism are provided in \\textit{Materials and Methods}.\nIn \\SI, Fig.~S1 depicts the singularity spectrum $f(\\alpha)$ for both human and mouse Chr~1 Hi-C maps; the smooth shape of $f(\\alpha)$ in both organisms further indicates multifractal rather than bifractal.\n\n\n\nFigure~\\ref{fig:Empirical} shows $20$~Mb subregions of the Hi-C maps for human and mouse chromosome (Chr)~1 and $\\tau(q)$. \nBoth maps show a pronounced diagonal corresponding to many local contacts and block-like TADs (see Figs.~\\ref{fig:Empirical}A and B).\nFigures~\\ref{fig:Empirical}C and D show $\\tau(q)$ as a function of $q$ when $l\\approx 4$~Mb.\nBoth curves have the same general shape: they exhibit a crossover, where the slope shifts from $2$ for small $q$ to nearly $1$ for large $q$.\nThe gray lines show the two predicted scaling relations and agree well with the measured $\\tau(q)$ (see below).\nWe selected Chr~1 for both organisms because it is the longest.\nIn \\SI, Figs.~S2--S5 show results for the other chromosomes.\n\n\n\nThe nonlinear $\\tau(q)$ indicates that the Hi-C maps have a more heterogeneous mass distribution than a monofractal.\nIn such case, the generalized dimension $D_q = \\tau(q)/(q-1)$ is independent of $q$ and equal to the fractal dimension $d_f$, yielding a linear $\\tau(q) = d_f(q-1)$.\nThe $q$-dependent slope of $\\tau(q)$ observed here, in contrast, reflects the coexistence of multiple scaling regimes.\nIn the following sections, we explain this scaling behavior analytically using a power-law-decaying contact probability $P(s)$, typical of polymers, without imposing any specific structural model.\nNote that we present results only for $q \\geq 0$, as $\\mu_l^q$ diverges in boxes with zero mass for $q < 0$, making the generalized partition function $Z(q,l)$ ill-defined.\n\n\n%---------------------------------------------\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\subsection*{Heuristic argument on origin of multifractal scaling in Hi-C maps}\n\n%\n\\begin{figure*}[t!]\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{02_Boxes_DiagramOne.pdf}\n\\caption{\nSchematic overview of the multifractal analysis of Hi-C maps.\n%\n(A) Relation between box mass $\\mu_l(\\text{box})$ and polymer contacts.\nDiagonal boxes count intra-segment contacts, and off-diagonal boxes count inter-segment contacts.\nHere, $l$ is the linear size of the box, which corresponds to the length of each segment.\n%\n(B) Contact probability $P(s)$ as a function of genomic distance $s$ for human Chr~1.\n$P(s)$ is obtained by applying logarithmic binning to the KR-normalized contact frequencies and exhibits power-law decay with $s$.\nThe gray dashed line shows a power-law fit with contact exponent $\\gamma \\approx 1.09$.\n%\n(C) Schematic illustration of the matrix transformation used for analytical treatment.\nStarting from the upper triangular part of the original contact map of system size $L$, we rotate it by $45$ degrees (red arrow), yielding a right triangle with system size $L' = L/\\sqrt{2}$.\nSince $P(s)$ of a single-exponent model depends only on the genomic distance $s = |x-y|$, the two halves of the triangle contribute equally to $Z(q,l)$, and we restrict to one half.\nWe then approximate the hypotenuse of the resulting triangle by a staircase boundary shown as yellow steps and arrows.\nThe step index $f$ denotes the distance from the diagonal of the original map: $f = 0$ for diagonal boxes and $f > 0$ for off-diagonal boxes.\nEach box in the staircase shape has size $l$ and is subdivided into smaller boxes of size $s'_0 = s_0/\\sqrt{2}$. \n}\\label{fig:scheme}\n\\end{figure*}\n%\n\n\nTo build intuition, we first present a simple argument, which explains the two slopes in large- and small-$q$ regimes (Figs.~\\ref{fig:Empirical}C and D), as well as the crossover, before showing the full derivation.\nDetailed calculations are provided in the following section.\n\n\n\nIn order to capture the two scaling regimes, we decompose $Z(q,l)$ into diagonal and off-diagonal contributions:\n%\n\\begin{equation} \n\tZ(q,l) = Z_\\text{diag}(q,l) + Z_\\text{off}(q,l),\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhere $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$ accounts for contacts within segments of size $l$, and $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ contains inter-segment contacts (see Fig.~\\ref{fig:scheme}A).\nThen, we use the empirically observed form of $P(s)$, which decays as a power law with genomic distance $s$:\n%\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Ps}\nP(s) =\n\\begin{cases}\nC,\\ &s < s_0,\\\\\nC (s / s_0)^{-\\gamma},\\ &s \\geq s_0,\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhere $C$ is a normalization factor (depends on the system size $L$ but not on $l$), and $s_0$ denotes a cutoff representing the smallest resolvable genomic distance, such as the experimental resolution limit, and prevents divergence at small $s$.\nIn our empirical data analysis, $s_0 = 25$~kb.\nThroughout our analytic calculations, we set $s_0$ to unity by choosing it as the unit of genomic distance.\nFigure~\\ref{fig:scheme}B shows the empirical contact probability $P(s)$ for human Chr~1.\n\n\n\nThe slopes in $\\tau(q)$ result from a competition between diagonal (intra-segment) and off-diagonal (inter-segment) contributions that dominate $Z(q,l)\\sim l^{\\tau(q)}$ in different $q$ regimes.\nTo see this, we note that $\\mu_l$ is larger in diagonal boxes than in off-diagonal ones since $\\mu_l\\sim l \\int P(s)ds$ and $P(s)$ decays with $s$. \nConsequently, when evaluating $\\mu_l^q$, the diagonal contribution $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$ dominates for large $q$, while the off-diagonal contribution $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ does so for small $q$.\nFor analytical convenience, we approximate the sums defining the mass $\\mu_l$ and the generalized partition function $Z(q,l)$ by integrals in the regime $s_0 \\ll l \\ll L$.\n\n\n\nFor the diagonal contribution, the integral yields\n%\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:contribution_diag}\nZ_\\text{diag}(q,l) \\propto \\frac{L}{l} \\left( l\\int^l_{s_0} s^{-\\gamma} ds \\right)^q \\sim \n\\begin{cases}\nl^{q-1},\\ &\\gamma \\geq 1,\\\\\nl^{q(2-\\gamma)-1},\\ &\\gamma<1,\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhere the prefactor $L/l$ corresponds to the number of boxes along the diagonal.\nFor $\\gamma \\geq 1$, the integral $\\int_{s_0}^l s^{-\\gamma} ds$ is dominated by the lower cutoff $s_0$ and becomes nearly independent of $l$, leading to $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)\\sim l^{q-1}$.\nOn the other hand, for $\\gamma < 1$, the cutoff term becomes negligible, thus $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l) \\sim l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1}$.\n\n\n\nAs we mentioned above, $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$ dominates $Z(q,l)$ at large $q$, and thus determines $\\tau(q)$.\nWhen $\\gamma \\geq 1$, we identify $\\tau(q)=q-1$.\nThis is consistent with the empirical Hi-C data, where $\\gamma \\approx 1.09$ for human Chr~1 and $\\gamma \\approx 1.1$ for mouse Chr~1 at length scales roughly around $1$~Mb--$10$~Mb.\nWhen $\\gamma < 1$, we find $\\tau(q) = q(2-\\gamma)-1$, i.e., $\\tau(q)$'s slope is $2-\\gamma$.\n\n\n\nThe off-diagonal contribution $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ shows a different scaling behavior than $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$:\n%\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:contribution_off}\nZ_\\text{off}(q,l) \\propto \\left(\\frac{L}{l}\\right)^2\\left(d^{-\\gamma} l^2 \\right)^q \\sim l^{2(q-1)},\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhere the prefactor $\\left( L/l \\right)^2$ represents the number of off-diagonal boxes, and $d$ denotes the distance of an off-diagonal box from the diagonal.\nHere, we assume that the boxes are sufficiently far away from the diagonal so that the variation of $s$ across them is negligible. \nUnder this assumption, the integrated contact probability within each box is proportional to $d^{-\\gamma} l^2$.\nFinally, since $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ dominates the small-$q$ regime because of the power-law decaying $P(s)$, we find $\\tau(q)=2(q-1)$.\n\n\n\nThe heuristic argument above considers only the two limiting cases: boxes on the diagonal and those far away from the diagonal.\nIn practice, however, off-diagonal boxes at intermediate distances interpolate between these extremes.\nTheir contributions become significant around the crossover $q \\sim 1/\\gamma$ (derived by equating $\\tau(q)$ for large and small $q$) leading to a smooth crossover in $\\tau(q)$ rather than a sharp transition.\nThis contribution persists at large system size $L$, because the number of intermediate boxes increases as $L$ increases.\nThis gradual transition reflects the shift in the dominant contribution to $Z(q,l)$ from inter- to intra-segment contacts, as $q$ increases.\nAs a result, the scaling behavior of $\\tau(q)$ is inherently smooth, even though it exhibits clear two asymptotic regimes.\n%\n\n%---------------------------------------------\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\subsection*{Analytic derivation of multifractal scaling in the single-exponent model}\n\n\n\nThis section provides the detailed derivation of the generalized partition function $Z(q,l)$, complementing the heuristic results above.\nWe consider an $L\\times L$ contact map whose entries depend only on the genomic distance $s=|x-y|$ through $P(s)$, where $(x,y)$ is the position of the entry.\nSuch a map is translationally invariant along the diagonal and carries no position-specific features such as TADs or sub-TADs; $P(s)$ is its only ingredient.\nAny multifractality it produces therefore originates from $P(s)$ and the two-dimensional map geometry alone.\nFor analytical convenience, we rotate the matrix and extend the domain into a staircase geometry (see Fig.~\\ref{fig:scheme}C).\n%(see Fig.~\\ref{fig:scheme}D).\nThus, the mass at the $f$-th step from the diagonal is\n%\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:our_mu}\n\\mu_l(f) = \\frac{l}{s'_0} \\sum_{s' = l f}^{l(f+1)-1} P(s') \\approx \\frac{l}{s'_0} \\int_{lf}^{l(f+1)} P(s') ds',\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhere $f$ ranges from $0$ to $L'/l-1$, and $s'_0=s_0/\\sqrt{2}$.\nSimilarly, we express $Z(q,l)$ as\n%\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:our_Z}\n\\begin{split}\n&Z(q, l) = 4 \\sum_{f=0}^{L'/l-1} \\left( \\frac{L'}{l} - f \\right) \\left[ \\mu_l(f) \\right]^q\\\\\n&\\ \\approx 4 \\frac{L'}{l} \\left[\\mu_l(f=0) \\right]^q + 4\\int_{1}^{L'/l} \\left(\\frac{L'}{l} - f\\right) \\left[\\mu_l(f) \\right]^q df,\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhere the first term ($f=0$) corresponds to $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$ and the second one ($f>0$) to $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$.\nFor simplicity, we redefine $s$ and $L$ by dropping the primes from $s'=s/\\sqrt{2}$ and $L'=L/\\sqrt{2}$, since this does not affect the $l$-scaling.\n\n\n\nWe present the calculation results of Eqs.~\\ref{eq:our_mu} and \\ref{eq:our_Z} for the diagonal and off-diagonal contributions below.\nFor the diagonal boxes, we compute the mass $\\mu_l(f=0)$ using $P(s)$ from Eq.~\\ref{eq:Ps} and obtain\n%\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:mu_diag}\n\\mu_l(f=0) = \n\\begin{cases}\n\\frac{C l}{\\gamma-1} \\left[ \\gamma - \\left( l/s_0 \\right)^{1-\\gamma} \\right], &\\gamma \\neq 1, \\\\\nC l \\left[ 1 + \\ln \\left(l/s_0 \\right) \\right], & \\gamma = 1.\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nIn the first case of Eq.~\\ref{eq:mu_diag}, the mass reduces to $\\mu_l(f=0) \\approx \\frac{\\gamma Cl}{\\gamma-1}$, which scales as $l$ for $\\gamma >1$, while for $\\gamma < 1$, $\\mu_l(f=0) \\approx \\frac{Cl}{1-\\gamma} \\left( l/s_0\\right)^{1-\\gamma}$, yielding $\\sim l^{2-\\gamma}$.\nSubstituting these results into Eq.~\\ref{eq:our_Z}, we obtain the diagonal contribution as\n%\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:detail_Zdiag}\nZ_\\text{diag}(q,l) \\approx\n\\begin{cases}\n\\frac{4 \\gamma^q C^q }{(\\gamma-1)^q} L\\, l^{q-1} \\sim l^{q-1},\\ &\\gamma > 1,\\\\\n4 C^q L \\left[1 + \\ln(l/s_0) \\right]^q l^{q-1}\\, \\sim l^{q-1},\\ &\\gamma=1,\\\\\n\\frac{4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)}}{(1-\\gamma)^q} L \\, l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1} \\sim l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1},\\ &\\gamma<1.\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nThis result is consistent with the heuristic argument in the previous section (see Eq.~\\ref{eq:contribution_diag}).\n\n\n\nFor the off-diagonal region, we obtain the mass $\\mu_l(f>0)$ from Eq.~\\ref{eq:our_mu} as \n%\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:mu_off}\n\\mu_l(f>0) \\approx C l \\left( l/s_0 \\right)^{1-\\gamma}f^{-\\gamma},\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhich scales as $l^{2-\\gamma}$.\nHere, we use the approximations $(f+1)^{1-\\gamma} - f^{1-\\gamma} \\approx (1-\\gamma) f^{-\\gamma}$ and $\\ln(f+1) - \\ln f \\approx f^{-1}$.\nIn \\SI, Fig.~S6 shows the validation of these approximations.\nUsing this result, we obtain the dominant term in the off-diagonal contribution as\n%\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:detail_Zoff}\nZ_\\text{off}(q,l) \\approx\n\\begin{cases}\n\\frac{4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)}}{q\\gamma-1} L \\, l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1} \\sim l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1},\\ &q\\gamma > 1,\\\\\n4 C^q s_0^{1-q} L \\ln(L/l)\\, l^{2(q-1)} \\sim l^{2(q-1)},\\ &q\\gamma = 1,\\\\\n\\frac{4 C^q s_0^{q(\\gamma-1)}}{1-q\\gamma} L^{2-q\\gamma} \\, l^{2(q-1)} \\sim l^{2(q-1)},\\ &q\\gamma < 1.\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nWe omit the subleading term $-4\\int_1^{L/l} f \\left[ \\mu_l(f) \\right]^q df$, since it does not affect the dominant scaling.\nWithout this subleading term, the extension to the staircase gives the same result as the extension to the full square on the off-diagonal at the last step in Fig.~\\ref{fig:scheme}C.\n%Fig.~\\ref{fig:scheme}D.\nThis also supports the heuristic result in the previous section (see Eq.~\\ref{eq:contribution_off}), but with richer behavior: the detailed calculation for $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ exhibits an additional scaling regime, $Z_\\text{off}(q,l) \\sim l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1}$ when $q\\gamma > 1$, which is absent in the heuristic result.\nFurther details of the derivation are provided in \\SI.\n\n\n%\n\\begin{figure}[t!]\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{03_DiagramOne.pdf}\n\\caption{\n\tRegion diagram and its validation.\n (A) Diagram of the dominant $\\tau(q)$ behavior in $(\\gamma,q)$-space.\n\tThe dominant behavior of $\\tau(q)$ is divided into four regions:\n (I) yellow: $\\tau(q) = 2(q - 1)$;\n\t(II) red: $\\tau(q) = q(2 - \\gamma) - 1$;\n\t(III) blue: $\\tau(q) = q - 1$;\n (IV) green: $\\tau(q)$ depends on box size $l$:\n $\\tau(q) = q-1$ for $l > l^*$, and $\\tau(q) = 2(q-1)$ for $l < l^*$, where $l^* \\propto (L/s_0)^{(1-q\\gamma)/(1-q)}s_0$.\n (B and C) Validation of the analytical results using synthetic contact maps with (B) $\\gamma=0.5$ and (C) $\\gamma=1.5$.\n The colored lines indicate the analytical predictions from (A), and the white lines show $\\tau(q)$ obtained from the analytical expression $Z(q,l) = Z_\\text{diag}(q,l) + Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ (see \\SI).\n The synthetic maps have system size $L=10^6$ and $\\tau(q)$ for the black points in (B) and (C) is calculated with box size $l=10^3$.\n}\\label{fig:diagram_single}\n\\end{figure}\n%\n\n\n\nBy analyzing the dominant contributions to $Z(q,l)$, we find four regimes of $\\tau(q)$.\nFigure~\\ref{fig:diagram_single}A illustrates these regimes in $(\\gamma,q)$-space.\nThe crossover boundaries follow from Eqs.~\\ref{eq:detail_Zdiag} and \\ref{eq:detail_Zoff}.\nWhen $\\gamma < 1$, $\\tau(q)$ changes from $\\tau(q) = 2(q-1)$ (region I, yellow) to $\\tau(q) = q(2-\\gamma)-1$ (region II, red) as $q$ increases. \nThe crossover is centered at $q = 1/\\gamma$, where both contributions become comparable.\nIn region III (blue), $\\tau(q)=q-1$.\nIn region IV (green), $\\tau(q)$ is more complicated since it seems to depend on the box size $l$.\nWhen $l$ is smaller than a certain threshold $l^* \\propto (L/s_0)^{(1-q\\gamma)/(1-q)}$, $\\tau(q)=2(q-1)$ as in region I, while for $l > l^*$, $\\tau(q) = q-1$ as in region III.\nSince the exponent is positive in region IV, $l^*$ is large, and thus $l < l^*$ typically holds, yielding $\\tau(q) = 2(q-1)$ as in region I.\n\n\n\n\nWe validate the results using synthetic contact maps of size $L=10^6$ generated from a single power-law contact decay (Eq.~\\ref{eq:Ps}), which contain no detailed structure beyond $P(s)$.\n%They reproduce the same mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ seen in empirical data, defining a null model: the $\\tau(q)$ predicted from $P(s)$ alone is the baseline, and a genuine, irreducible multifractality would appear in empirical Hi-C maps as a $\\tau(q)$ that departs systematically from this prediction.\n%We observe no such departure, either in human and mouse here or in any organism examined below.\nFigures~\\ref{fig:diagram_single}B and C show the resulting $\\tau(q)$ as a function of $q$ for two different values of $\\gamma$, where the black dots represent the measurement from the synthetic contact maps.\nIn Fig.~\\ref{fig:diagram_single}B ($\\gamma=0.5$), $\\tau(q)$ increases with a slope of $2$ until $q = 2$ $(=1/\\gamma)$, after which the slope changes to $3/2$ $( = 2-\\gamma)$.\nFor $\\gamma=1.5$ (Fig.~\\ref{fig:diagram_single}C), the slope of $\\tau(q)$ is again $2$ for small $q$ but shifts to $1$ for $q>2/3$.\nThe colored solid lines indicate the theoretical predictions from Eqs.~\\ref{eq:detail_Zdiag} and \\ref{eq:detail_Zoff} with colors matching the four regimes in Fig.~\\ref{fig:diagram_single}A.\nThe white lines indicate the results from $Z(q,l) = Z_\\text{diag}(q,l) + Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ (see \\SI).\nWe find excellent agreement between theory and simulation.\nOverall, $\\tau(q)$ in synthetic maps exhibits asymptotically piecewise linear behavior with smooth crossovers between regimes, in agreement with both the heuristic argument and the detailed analytical calculations.\n\n\n%---------------------------------------------\n\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\subsection*{Robustness of Multifractal Behavior to Perturbations}\n\n\n\nTo assess the robustness of the multifractal behavior against experimental noise, we add white noise $\\xi(x,y) \\sim \\mathcal{N}(0,\\sigma^2)$ to each entry $(x,y)$ of empirical Hi-C maps after KR-normalization.\nWe test two noise levels representing weak and strong perturbations: $\\sigma = 10^{-4}$ and $\\sigma = 10^{-3}$.\nTo ensure that the contact maps remain non-negative, we resample $\\xi(x,y)$ whenever the resulting entry becomes negative.\n\n\n\nWith this additive white noise, $P(s)$ is significantly affected at large $s$ (see Figs.~\\ref{fig:noise}A and B).\nWhile $P(s)$ decays with exponent $\\gamma\\approx 0.7$ in the small-$s$ regime, it exhibits a clear plateau at large $s$.\nFor comparison, the gray lines show the noise-free $P(s)$, which continues to decay throughout the entire range.\nThe plateau level increases with $\\sigma$, consistent with a signal-independent additive noise that dominates whenever the underlying contact signal becomes smaller than the typical noise amplitude $\\sigma$.\nThe contact exponent $\\gamma \\approx 0.7$ is extracted from the slope of $\\tau(q)$ in the large-$q$ regime.\nUsing this $\\gamma$, we fit the prefactor in $P(s)$ to the empirical $P(s)$ in the small-$s$ regime of $s\\in[50~\\text{kb}, 250~\\text{kb}]$, obtaining a standard error of the fit $2.6\\times10^{-5}$.\nThis small standard error confirms that the contact exponent extracted from $\\tau(q)$ accurately describes $P(s)$ in the small-$s$ regime.\n\n\n\n\nIn contrast, the mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ remains essentially unchanged (Figs.~\\ref{fig:noise}C and D, $l=250$~kb).\nFor both $\\sigma$ values, $\\tau(q)$ retains its piecewise linear shape, with the same slopes as in the noise-free single-exponent model: the small-$q$ slope is $2$, and the large-$q$ slope is around $1.3 (=2-\\gamma)$, consistent with our predictions (see Fig.~\\ref{fig:diagram_single} for $\\gamma<1$).\nThe pink dotted lines show the theoretical prediction of $\\tau(q)$, which is obtained from the analytical expression of $Z(q,l)$ within the single-exponent model (see \\SI).\nNote the excellent agreement between the data analysis results (points) and theoretical predictions (lines).\nThese results imply that the multifractal behavior of the Hi-C maps is robust to additive white noise, as long as the white noise does not erase the power-law decay across the entire $s$ range.\nNote that $\\tau(q)$ measured here at $l=250$~kb shows a large-$q$ slope of $2-\\gamma$ rather than $1$, reflecting that $l$ lies within the small-$s$ regime of $P(s)$ with $\\gamma<1$.\nThis $l$ dependence of $\\tau(q)$ and its connection to the two-regime structure of $P(s)$ are analyzed in a later section, where we extend the single-exponent model to a double-exponent model to account for the two-regime structure of $P(s)$.\n\n\n%\n\\begin{figure}[!t]\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{04_WithNoise.pdf}\n\\caption{\nMultifractal analysis of human Chr~1 with additive white noise $\\xi(x,y) \\sim \\mathcal{N}(0,\\sigma^2)$ added to each ($x,y$) element of the Hi-C map.\n(A and B) The contact probability $P(s)$ exhibits a plateau at large $s$, which is absent in Fig.~\\ref{fig:scheme}B.\nThe contact exponent $\\gamma$ in small-$s$ regime is $\\gamma\\approx 0.7$ extracted from the slope of $\\tau(q)$ in the large-$q$ regime $q\\in[2,10]$.\n(C and D) The mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ computed in the box size $l=250$~kb, which lies within the power-law regime of $P(s)$ with exponent $0.7$.\nThe slope of $\\tau(q)$ for large $q$ is approximately $1.3$ $(=2-\\gamma)$, and the slope is $2$ for small $q$.\nThe pink dotted lines show $\\tau(q)$ computed from the analytical expression $Z(q,l) = Z_\\text{diag}(q,l) + Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ within the single-exponent model.\nThe noise level $\\sigma$ is $\\sigma = 10^{-4}$ in (A) and (C), and $\\sigma =10^{-3}$ in (B) and (D).\nThe plateau height in (A and B) is of the same order of magnitude as $\\sigma$.\nThe multifractal scaling remains robust even in the presence of noise.\nThe black dotted line in (A) shows the slope of $0.7$.\n}\\label{fig:noise}\n\\end{figure}\n%\n\n%---------------------------------------------\n\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\subsection*{Universal Multifractal Behavior across Diverse Species}\n%\n\\begin{figure*}[t!]\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{05_OtherSpecies.pdf}\n\\caption{ \n Multifractal behavior across six Australian species.\n\tFor each species, we show the Hi-C contact map (top), the contact probability \n$P(s)$ (middle), and the mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ (bottom).\n\t(A--C) New Zealand fur seal, \n\t(D--F) black swan, \n\t(G--I) central bearded dragon, \n\t(J--L) whale shark, \n\t(M--O) bluegreen aphid, \n\t(P--R) subterranean clover.\n\tThe gray lines in the $\\tau(q)$ panels indicate the theoretical predictions $\\tau(q) = 2(q-1)$ for small $q$, and $\\tau(q)=q-1$ for large $q$.\n\tAll species exhibit a power-law decay in $P(s)$ followed by a large-$s$ plateau, while $\\tau(q)$ retains the piece-wise linear form characteristic of multifractal scaling.\n\tBox size is set to $l\\approx 4$~Mb for all species.\n Gray lines show two predictions in the large- and small-$q$ limits.\n}\\label{fig:others_species}\n\\end{figure*}\n%\n\n\nWe apply multifractal analysis to six Australian species spanning diverse taxonomic groups: New Zealand fur seal (\\textit{Arctocephalus forsteri}, mammal), black swan (\\textit{Cygnus atratus}, bird), central bearded dragon (\\textit{Pogona vitticeps}, reptile)~\\cite{CentralBeardedDragon}, whale shark (\\textit{Rhincodon typus}, fish)~\\cite{WhaleShark}, bluegreen aphid (\\textit{Acyrthosiphon kondoi}, insect), and subterranean clover (\\textit{Trifolium subterraneum}, plant)~\\cite{Clover}.\nThe empirical Hi-C maps for these species are publicly available through the Western Australia Genome Atlas~\\cite{WAGA}, part of the global DNA Zoo consortium~\\cite{dudchenko2017novo,Dudchenko254797}.\n\n\n\nFor each species, we calculate the contact probability $P(s)$ and the mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ from Hi-C data.\nThe contact probability $P(s)$ exhibits a power-law decay up to intermediate $s$, followed by a plateau for large $s$.\nAs shown in the previous section, additive noise added to synthetic Hi-C maps produces a similar plateau in $P(s)$ (see Fig.~\\ref{fig:noise}).\nRegardless of its origin--possibly arising from Rabl-like confinement, finite size effects~\\cite{lieberman2009comprehensive,hoencamp20213d,gursoy2014spatial}, or experimental noise--$\\tau(q)$ retains the same multifractal scaling we observed in human and mouse Hi-C maps (see Fig.~\\ref{fig:Empirical}).\nThis consistency across diverse taxonomic groups suggests that such multifractal behavior is a universal feature of chromatin architecture.\n\n\n\nFigure~\\ref{fig:others_species} shows the data for all six species (for the longest Hi-C scaffold): Hi-C maps (top row of each block), contact probabilities $P(s)$ (middle row), and mass exponents $\\tau(q)$ (bottom row).\nThe Hi-C maps exhibit block-diagonal structures, as observed in human and mouse, and $P(s)$ decay as a power law with a plateau at large $s$.\nImportantly, $\\tau(q)$ exhibits a piecewise-linear shape at intermediate box sizes ($l\\approx 4$~Mb).\nThis confirms that multifractal behavior appears across all six species. \nIncluding mouse and human suggests that this behavior is universal across organisms.\n\n\n\n%---------------------------------------------\n\n%---------------------------------------------\n\n\\subsection*{Double-exponent model explains observed scale dependence of multifractal behavior}\n\n%\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n\\centering\n\\includegraphics[width=\\linewidth]{06_Tau_DiagramDouble.pdf}\n\\caption{\nScale dependence of multifractal behavior and mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ in the double-exponent model.\n(A and B) The slope of $\\tau(q)$ is the same at small $q$ but differs at large $q$ between two box sizes $l=200$~kb and $l=4$~Mb, in both (A) human and (B) mouse Hi-C maps.\nDots represent $\\tau(q)$ computed from empirical Hi-C maps, and colored lines show theoretical predictions.\n(C and D) Region diagrams show the dominant $\\tau(q)$ regions in the (C) large-$l$ ($l>s_T$) and (D) small-$l$ ($l<s_T$) regimes.\n(C) For large $l$, the dominant $\\tau(q)$ falls into four regions as in the single-exponent model:\n(I) yellow: $\\tau(q) = 2(q - 1)$;\n(II) violet: $\\tau(q) = q(2 - \\eta) - 1$;\n(III) blue: $\\tau(q)=q-1$;\n(IV) green: $\\tau(q)$ depends on the box size $l$: $\\tau(q) = q-1$ for $l > l^*$, and $\\tau(q) = 2(q-1)$ for $l < l^*$.\nThe crossover scale is $l^* \\propto (L/s_0)^{(1-q\\gamma)/(1-q)}s_0$.\n(D) For small $l$, the dominant $\\tau(q)$ falls into two regions, following the same labeling as in (C):\n(I) yellow: $\\tau(q) = 2(q - 1)$;\n(V) red: $\\tau(q) =q(2 - \\gamma) - 1$.\n(E--G) Validation of the predictions using synthetic contact maps of size $L=10^6$, for (E and F) large $l$ ($l=10^5$) and (G) small $l$ ($l=10^2$).\nThe transition scale is $s_T=10^3$.\nThe contact exponent in the large-$s$ regime is $\\eta=0.85$ for (E) and $\\eta=1.5$ for (F and G), while that in the small-$s$ regime is $\\gamma=0.5$.\n}\\label{fig:diagram_double}\n\\end{figure}\n%\n\n\nIn the preceding sections, we observed that the slope of $\\tau(q)$ in the large-$q$ regime differs between $l\\approx 4$~Mb (see Fig.~\\ref{fig:Empirical}C) and $l=250$~kb (see Figs.~\\ref{fig:noise}B and C), suggesting that this slope depends on the box size $l$.\nWe examine this dependence more systematically in Figs.~\\ref{fig:diagram_double}A and B for human and mouse Hi-C maps, comparing $l=200$~kb (red dots) and $l=4$~Mb (blue dots) along with theoretical predictions: $\\tau(q) = 2(q-1)$ (yellow line), $\\tau(q) = q(2-\\gamma)-1$ (red line), and $\\tau(q)=q-1$ (blue line).\nThe data-derived $\\tau(q)$ (red dots) lies close to the prediction $\\tau(q)=q(2-\\gamma)-1$ (red line) when $l=200$~kb.\nHowever, for $l=4$~Mb (blue dots), it rather follows $\\tau(q)=q-1$ (blue line).\nThis $l$ dependence reflects the two-regime structure of $P(s)$ in empirical Hi-C maps, which the single-exponent model does not capture.\n\n\n\nTo account for this, we extend our model to a model in which $P(s)$ follows two power laws separated by a transition scale $s_T$.\nSuch two-regime behavior has been reported in empirical Hi-C maps~\\cite{sanborn2015chromatin,rao20143d} and is often associated with loop extrusion and TAD formation~\\cite{sanborn2015chromatin,chan2023theory,chan2024activity}.\nThe contact probability in Fig.~\\ref{fig:scheme}B (human) also exhibits a change in its scaling exponent between the short and long genomic distance $s$.\n\n\n\nThe double-exponent model has two exponents, $\\gamma$ and $\\eta$, and reads\n%\n\\begin{equation} \\label{eq:p_double}\nP(s) =\n\\begin{cases}\nC,&s < s_0,\\\\\nC (s/s_0)^{-\\gamma},&s_0 \\leq s < s_T,\\\\\nC (s_T/s_0)^{-\\gamma}(s/s_T)^{-\\eta},&s_T \\leq s,\n\\end{cases}\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhere $s_T$ is the transition scale.\nThe model decays with exponent $\\gamma$ in the small-$s$ regime ($s_0 \\leq s < s_T$) and with $\\eta$ in the large-$s$ regime ($s \\geq s_T$).\nFor simplicity, we approximate the change in the contact exponent as a sharp transition at $s_T$.\nAlthough Hi-C experiments typically yield $\\eta \\geq 1$, we keep our analysis general and consider both $\\eta < 1$ and $\\eta \\geq 1$, with the assumption $\\gamma < 1$.\nThe small exponent $\\gamma<1$ is observed empirically at small genomic distances~\\cite{sanborn2015chromatin} (see Figs.~\\ref{fig:scheme}B, \\ref{fig:noise}A and C for $s \\lesssim 500~\\text{kb}$).\n\n\nFor this model, $\\tau(q)$ depends on the box size $l$ relative to $s_T$.\nFor large $l$ $(l > s_T)$, each diagonal box spans both the $\\gamma$ and $\\eta$ regimes of $P(s)$.\nThus, the diagonal contribution $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$ becomes\n%\n\\begin{equation}\nZ_\\text{diag}(q,l) \\propto \\frac{L}{l} \\left[ l\\left( \\int^{s_T}_{s_0} ds\\, s^{-\\gamma} +s_T^{\\eta-\\gamma}\\int^{l}_{s_T} ds\\, s^{-\\eta}\\right) \\right]^q.\n\\end{equation}\n%\nAs in the single-exponent model (with $\\eta$ replacing $\\gamma$), this term becomes $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l) \\sim l^{q-1}$ for $\\eta \\geq 1$, and $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l) \\sim l^{q(2-\\eta)-1}$ for $\\eta < 1$.\nThe off-diagonal contribution $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ also depends on $\\eta$, but its dominant term exhibits the same scaling behavior as in the single-exponent model (see Eq.~\\ref{eq:detail_Zoff}) with $\\gamma$ replaced by $\\eta$, yielding $Z_\\text{off}(q,l) \\sim l^{q(2-\\eta)-1}$ for $q\\eta >1$ and $\\sim l^{2(q-1)}$ for $q\\eta \\leq 1$.\nTherefore, for large $q$ and large $l$ $(l > s_T)$, $\\tau(q) = q-1$ when $\\eta > 1$ and $\\tau(q)=q(2-\\eta)-1$ when $\\eta < 1$.\nWhen $q$ is small, $\\tau(q) = 2(q-1)$.\nInterestingly, we do not see $\\gamma$ dependence in $\\tau(q)$ for large $l$ because each diagonal box spans both the $\\gamma$ and $\\eta$ regimes of $P(s)$, and thus the fine-scale information characterized by $\\gamma$ is coarse-grained away by integrating out $P(s)$ over $s$ within $\\mu_l$.\n\n\n\nConversely, for small $l$ $(l < s_T)$, each diagonal box lies entirely within the $\\gamma$ regime, so $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$ shows the same scaling as in the single-exponent model, i.e., $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l) \\sim l^{q(2-\\gamma)-1}$ since $\\gamma < 1$.\nUsing the far-from-diagonal approximation, the off-diagonal term $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ takes the form \n%\n\\begin{equation}\nZ_\\text{off}(q,l) \\propto \\left(\\frac{L}{l}\\right)^2 \\left( s_T^{\\eta-\\gamma} d^{-\\eta} l^2 \\right)^q \\sim l^{2(q-1)},\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhere $d$ is the distance from the diagonal.\nThus, for small $l$ $(l< s_T)$, the mass exponent is $\\tau(q)=q(2-\\gamma)-1$ in the large-$q$ regime, and $\\tau(q)=2(q-1)$ in the small-$q$ regime.\nThe detailed derivations are provided in \\SI.\nNote that the double-exponent model can also be applied to analyze multifractal behavior of the Hi-C maps of eight species (human and mouse with noise, and six Australian species), whose plateau in large $s$ corresponds to $\\eta \\approx 0$.\n\n\n\nFigure~\\ref{fig:diagram_double} shows the resulting diagrams for the scaling regimes associated with the double-exponent model.\nFor large $l$, the diagram (Fig.~\\ref{fig:diagram_double}C) has the same structure as in the single-exponent model (Fig.~\\ref{fig:diagram_single}A), with $\\eta$ replacing $\\gamma$.\nAccordingly, the red region in Fig.~\\ref{fig:diagram_single}A becomes violet with $\\tau(q) = q(2-\\eta)-1$.\nFor small $l$, the diagram (Fig.~\\ref{fig:diagram_double}D) contains only two regions: region I (yellow) with $\\tau(q)=2(q-1)$ and region V (red) with $\\tau(q)=q(2-\\gamma)-1$.\nWe validate these results with synthetic contact maps of size $L=10^6$ by generating data from Eq.~\\ref{eq:p_double} (Figs.~\\ref{fig:diagram_double}E--G).\nThe transition scale is set to $s_T=10^3$, and the box size is $l=10^5$ in Figs.~\\ref{fig:diagram_double}E and F, and $l=10^2$ in Fig.~\\ref{fig:diagram_double}G.\nWe fix $\\gamma=0.5$, and set $\\eta=0.85$ for Fig.~\\ref{fig:diagram_double}E, and $\\eta=1.5$ for Figs.~\\ref{fig:diagram_double}F and G.\nWhite lines show $\\tau(q)$ calculated from $Z(q,l) = Z_\\text{diag}(q,l) + Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ (see \\SI).\nAgain, we note excellent agreement with theoretical predictions.\nThe small discrepancies between the white lines and colored solid lines in Figs.~\\ref{fig:diagram_double}E, F, and G come from the subdominant terms in $\\tau(q)$.\n\n\n\n\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\section*{Summary and Discussion}\n%---------------------------------------------\n%---------------------------------------------\n%\nIn summary, we have observed multifractal behavior in Hi-C maps from human and mouse cells by measuring the mass exponent $\\tau(q)$.\nAs a minimal description, we have adopted a single-exponent model in which the contact probability $P(s)$ decays as a power law, motivated by the empirical observations that $P(s)$ decays as a power law in Hi-C maps~\\cite{lieberman2009comprehensive,nagano2013single,sanborn2015chromatin}, consistent with polymer scaling theory~\\cite{halverson2011molecular,mirny2011fractal,grosberg2014annealed}.\nUsing this model, we have revealed that the multifractality arises from the competition between diagonal and off-diagonal contributions, with the diagonal dominating at large $q$ and the off-diagonal at small $q$.\nWe have validated our results with synthetic Hi-C maps, which show excellent agreement with our theoretical predictions.\nWe have also shown that multifractal behavior is robust to noise and observed across several species.\nOur findings suggest that multifractal behavior is a universal feature of chromosome contact maps.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nFor a given polymer model with contact exponent $\\gamma$, our results provide a direct prediction of the multifractal scaling of the polymer model, establishing a direct link between multifractal behavior and polymer physics.\nThe mass $\\mu_l$ in the diagonal and off-diagonal boxes corresponds to two distinct types of polymer contacts: intra-segment (diagonal) and inter-segment (off-diagonal).\nThese are governed by two contact-associated exponents in polymer physics, which we refer to as the bulk contact exponent $\\beta_b$ and the surface contact exponent $\\beta_s$.\nWhile $\\beta_b$ characterizes the scaling of the number of contacts within a segment [$\\beta_b=\\gamma_c$ in Ref.~\\cite{rosa2017beyond}], $\\beta_s$ characterizes the scaling of the number of contacts between two different segments [$\\beta_s=\\beta$ in Refs.~\\cite{halverson2011molecular,smrek2013novel,halverson2014melt,rosa2017beyond}].\nEach contribution to $Z(q,l)$ encodes one of these exponents: $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$ encodes $\\beta_b$ through the scaling of intra-segment contacts, while $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ encodes $\\beta_s$ through the scaling of inter-segment contacts.\n\n\n\nHowever, in the full partition function $Z(q,l) = Z_\\text{diag}(q,l) + Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$, only the dominant contribution determines the leading $\\tau(q)$, and these two exponents are not equally accessible.\nThe slope of $\\tau(q)$ in the large-$q$ regime directly encodes $\\beta_b$: it equals $2-\\gamma$ when $\\gamma<1$, and $1$ when $\\gamma \\geq 1$, consistent with the dominance of $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$ at large $q$.\nIn contrast, $\\beta_s$, which equals $1$ when $\\gamma \\leq 1$, and $2-\\gamma$ when $\\gamma > 1$, is hidden from the slope of $\\tau(q)$ through two mechanisms.\nFirst, $\\beta_s$ appears in $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ only when $q\\gamma > 1$ (i.e., $q > 1/\\gamma$), but this is precisely the regime where $Z_\\text{diag}(q,l)$ already dominates (region II in Fig.~\\ref{fig:diagram_single}), masking $\\beta_s$ by the stronger intra-segment contribution.\nSecond, when $q\\gamma < 1$, $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$ dominates, but the slope of $\\tau(q)$ becomes $2$, independent of $\\gamma$, because the off-diagonal boxes scale as $l^{-2}$ in number and each contains $O(l^2)$ entries, reflecting the two-dimensional geometry of the Hi-C contact map.\nThrough these two mechanisms, $\\beta_s$ is hidden from the slope of $\\tau(q)$ across the entire range of $q$.\nAs a result, the multifractal behavior of Hi-C maps selectively encodes $\\beta_b$, while $\\beta_s$, though present in the underlying contact statistics through $Z_\\text{off}(q,l)$, is not directly readable from the slope of $\\tau(q)$.\nHow to extract $\\beta_s$ directly from Hi-C multifractal analysis thus remains an open question.\n\n\n\n\nA contact exponent $\\gamma < 1$ has been observed in double-folded ring polymers, with $\\gamma \\approx 0.75$~\\cite{rosa2019conformational}.\nThis small contact exponent $\\gamma$ is also observed within TADs~\\cite{sanborn2015chromatin,fudenberg2016formation}, where loop extrusion generates locally compact conformations.\nThe $\\gamma <1$ regime in the double-exponent model thus directly corresponds to the small-scale organization of chromatin shaped by loop extrusion.\n\n\n\nWhile the exponents $\\gamma$, $\\beta_s$ and $\\beta_b$ characterize the contacts, spatial conformation of the polymer is described by the exponent $\\nu=1/d_{f}$ governing the scaling of the end-to-end distance $R$ of a segment of length $s$ as $R\\sim s^{1/d_{f}}$, where $d_f$ is the fractal dimension.\nAlthough the exponent $\\gamma$ is constrained but not determined by $d_{f}$ in general~\\cite{halverson2014melt}, in a mean-field approximation in 3D space $\\gamma = 3/d_{f}$.\nFrom this perspective, $\\gamma < 1$ indicates polymer conformation with $d_{f} > 3$~\\cite{chan2024activity}, which has been associated with active polymer dynamics~\\cite{chan2024activity}.\nNote that such scaling can hold only up to some finite scale, since otherwise the density would diverge, which is unphysical.\nAn effective fractal dimension higher than $3$ (within the mean-field interpretation) further indicates that the segment folds compactly on itself, so that intra-segment contacts dominate.\n\n\n%\nTo the best of our knowledge, the functional form of the mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ has historically been obtained from phenomenological arguments rather than being derived from microscopic mechanisms.\nIn turbulence, the multifractal behavior is captured by cascade models~\\cite{benzi1984multifractal,she1994universal}, and in financial market data by multiplicative cascade models~\\cite{calvet2002multifractality}.\nIn those systems, the multifractal behavior encodes an irreducible hierarchy of scaling exponents that is not fully determined by two-point statistics.\nHowever, in Hi-C maps, the situation is fundamentally different.\nWe have shown that the observed multifractal behavior is fully determined by the power-law contact probability $P(s)$ and the two-dimensional organization of the contact map, without requiring any cascade-like hierarchical structure.\nThe multifractality of Hi-C maps is therefore reducible to two-point statistics.\nWe stress that reducible does not mean spurious or apparent in the previous studies~\\cite{jiang2019multifractal,kantelhardt2002multifractal}.\nUnlike the finite-size artifacts that vanish as the system size grows, this reducible multifractality is real and robust, surviving large system sizes and added noise.\nIt is simply not an independent signature of a multiplicative cascade.\n\n\n\n%\nWe emphasize that this classification reflects the nature of Hi-C measurements rather than the absence of hierarchical organization in genome folding itself.\nGenomic folding is known to exhibit cascade-like hierarchical structures, ranging from chromosome territories and compartments to TADs, sub-TADs, and chromatin loops~\\cite{gibcus2013hierarchy,lieberman2009comprehensive,rao20143d,sanborn2015chromatin,fudenberg2016formation,bernenko2023mapping}.\nHowever, Hi-C maps encode only pairwise contact frequencies between two loci, and such two-point statistics are, by construction, blind to the higher-order correlations.\nA genuine cascade structure, irreducible to two-point contacts, would manifest through such higher-order correlations.\n%Probing the potentially irreducible multifractal nature of genome folding would therefore require going beyond standard Hi-C.\n\n\n\n%\nRecently, multifractal behavior has also been reported in real-space images of cell nuclei~\\cite{LEE2025}.\nThe authors concluded that multifractal behavior reflects the heterogeneous spatial distribution of chromatin density in the nucleus.\nThe multifractality observed in our study, however, has a fundamentally different origin.\nOur analysis is performed on the Hi-C maps, which encode contact statistics between genomic loci as a function of genomic distance, rather than the spatial distribution of chromatin density.\nAs a result, the multifractal behavior in our study arises from the coexistence of two distinct polymer scaling regimes rather than from spatial heterogeneity.\nBut both perspectives are connected and provide complementary insights.\nWhile the image-based multifractal analysis captures the heterogeneous packing of chromatin in real space, our contact-based analysis reveals the underlying polymer physics scaling governing chromatin organization.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n%\nIn addition to advancing our understanding of chromatin folding, our multifractal analysis provides a computationally reliable method for extracting the contact exponents $\\gamma$ and $\\eta$ from Hi-C data.\nExisting approaches obtain these exponents either by fitting $P(s)$ directly, by log-derivative methods, or by fitting the measured $\\tau(q)$ to an assumed structural model.\nThe last route was taken by a previous study~\\cite{pigolotti2020bifractal}, which fit $\\tau(q)$ (denoted $K(q)$ in their study) to a hierarchical domain model characterized by a single parameter $a$, yielding $\\gamma= \\ln(4a)/\\ln(2)$.\nIn contrast, our framework reads $\\gamma$ directly from the slope of $\\tau(q)$ without assumed structural model.\nOur method also provides an integral-based estimator that is potentially less sensitive to noise than direct fitting of log-derivative methods.\nMoreover, by varying the box size $l$, our framework naturally accommodates the two-regime contact decay observed empirically, in which $P(s)$ crosses over from $\\gamma$ to $\\eta$.\nThis scale-resolved analysis suggests that both exponents $\\gamma$ and $\\eta$ can be extracted from $\\tau(q)$ within a single framework.\n\n\n\n\n\nIn conclusion, the multifractal behavior of Hi-C maps arises from the geometric competition between intra- and inter-segment contacts in a polymer under a power-law-decaying contact probability.\nWe anticipate that this competition is a general feature of eukaryotic chromatin organization, as supported by our cross-species analysis spanning diverse taxonomic groups.\n\n\n%---------------------------------------------\n\n\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\section*{Materials and Methods}\n\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\subsection*{Data preprocessing}\nWe preprocess human and mouse Hi-C data (GSE63525)~\\cite{rao20143d} by removing centromeric loci, which exhibit zero contact frequency in the corresponding rows and columns of the Hi-C maps.\nThe contact frequencies are then normalized using KR normalization~\\cite{knight2013fast} to eliminate technical biases.\nFor Hi-C maps of six species from the Western Australia Genome Atlas~\\cite{dudchenko2017novo,WAGA}, we use the hic-straw~\\cite{DURAND201699} Python package to read the Hi-C data and apply KR normalization to each Hi-C scaffold.\nWe use all Hi-C maps at $25$~kb resolution throughout this study.\n\n\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\subsection*{Multifractal formalism}\nMultifractal formalism is a tool that characterizes how local singularity exponents are distributed across the system~\\cite{halsey1986fractal,jiang2019multifractal,salat2017multifractal,ott2002chaos}.\nWe apply this formalism to analyze the scaling behavior of Hi-C maps.\nFirst, we partition the Hi-C map into boxes of size $l$.\nThe probability mass in a box $b_i$ is defined as\n%\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:OneBox_Mass}\n \\mu_l(b_i) = \\sum_{(x,y)\\in b_i} P(|x-y|),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere the sum runs over all pairs of loci $(x,y)$ within box $b_i$, and $P(|x-y|)$ is the normalized contact probability between the pair $(x,y)$.\nNote that $P(|x-y|)$ is normalized such that $\\sum_{b_i}\\sum_{(x,y)\\in b_i} P(|x-y|) = 1$.\nThe mass $\\mu_l(b_i)$ quantifies the local concentration of contacts within box $b_i$.\nThe mass $\\mu_l$ in in diagonal boxes represents intra-segment contacts, while that in off-diagonal boxes corresponds to inter-segment contacts.\n\n\n\nFrom the mass $\\mu_l$ over all boxes, the generalized partition function is defined as\n%\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Z_general}\n Z(q, l) = \\sum_{i} [\\mu_l(b_i)]^q,\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhich quantifies the $q$-th moment of the mass distribution.\nIn multifractal formalism, $Z(q,l)$ is assumed to scale as \n%\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:Z_scaling}\n Z(q, l) \\sim l^{\\tau(q)},\n\\end{equation}\n%\nwhere $\\tau(q)$ is the mass exponent.\nA linear $\\tau(q)$ indicates monofractal behavior, while a nonlinear $\\tau(q)$ represents multifractal behavior.\n\n\n\nIn the multifractal formalism, the mass in each box is assumed to scale as $\\mu_l(b_i) \\sim l^{\\alpha_i}$, where $\\alpha_i$ is a local scaling exponent that varies across boxes.\nThe exponent $\\alpha_i$ is also referred to as the H{\\\"o}lder exponent or singularity index.\nThe mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ is one of the central quantities characterizing the multifractal structure.\nThe complementary quantity is the singularity spectrum $f(\\alpha)$, which is related to $\\tau(q)$ via a Legendre-Fenchel transform and contains equivalent information~\\cite{falconer1994multifractal,chhabra1989direct,chhabra1989direct2,halsey1986fractal,salat2017multifractal}.\nIn this study, we focus on $\\tau(q)$ since its behavior directly reveals the competition between diagonal and off-diagonal contributions.\nThe mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ and the singularity spectrum $f(\\alpha)$ are shown in \\SI: for human and mouse Chr~1 Hi-C maps (\\SI, Fig.~S1), \nfor the single-exponent model (\\SI, Fig.~S7), and for the double-exponent model (\\SI, Fig.~S8).\nNote that the generalized fractal dimension $D_q$ can be obtained from $\\tau(q)$ as $D_q = \\tau(q)/(q-1)$, which corresponds to the box-counting dimension at $q=0$, the information dimension at $q=1$, and the correlation dimension at $q=2$.\n\n\n\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\subsection*{Numerical calculation}\nFor a given box size $l$, we first partition the Hi-C map into boxes of size $l\\times l$ and compute the mass $\\mu_l(b_i)$ for each box $b_i$ as the sum of the normalized contact probabilities within the box.\nWe then compute the generalized partition function using Eq.~\\ref{eq:Z_general}, and the calculation is repeated for various values of $q$ and $l$.\n\n\n\nFrom the resulting $Z(q,l)$, we numerically calculate the mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ at a given $l$ as the logarithmic derivative:\n%\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:log_derivative}\n \\tau(q) = \\frac{d}{d \\ln l}\\ln Z(q,l).\n\\end{equation}\n%\nWithin the scaling regime where $Z(q,l)\\sim l^{\\tau(q)}$, we have $\\ln Z(q,l) = \\tau(q) \\ln l + C(q)$, where $C(q)$ is independent of $l$.\nThe ratio $\\ln Z(q,l)/\\ln l$ contains an additional term $C(q)/\\ln l$, which vanishes only as $l\\to \\infty$ for $\\forall q$.\nIn contrast, the derivative eliminates $C(q)$ and yields $\\tau(q)$ directly.\nTo compute the derivative with respect to $\\ln l$ numerically, we employ Fornberg's finite difference algorithm~\\cite{fornberg1988generation}. Specifically, we use a five-point stencil at each evaluation point on the $\\ln l$ grid, which yields fourth-order accuracy.\nFornberg's algorithm allows accurate derivatives even when the grid is non-uniformly spaced.\nIn \\SI, Fig.~S9, we compare the ratio $\\ln Z(q,l) / \\ln l$ and the mass exponent $\\tau(q)$ in Eq.~\\ref{eq:log_derivative} by varying $l$.\nThe difference scales as $1/\\ln l$\n\n\n%---------------------------------------------\n%\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\section*{Acknowledgments}\nThe authors thank A.~Grosberg and A.~Rosa for fruitful discussions.\nThis work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (Grant No.~RS-2025-02312897) and the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsr{\\aa}det) (Grants No.~2021-04080 and No.~2022-06543).\nUnpublished genome assemblies and sequencing data for six Australian species are used with permission from the DNA Zoo Consortium (\\url{dnazoo.org}).\n\n\n\\section*{Data Availability}\nHuman and mouse Hi-C maps used in this study are publicly available in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, \\url{www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/} (accession No.~GSE63525)~\\cite{rao20143d}.\nHi-C maps for the other six species are found in DNA Zoo, Western Australia Genome Atlas~\\cite{dudchenko2017novo,WAGA}.\nAnalysis codes have been deposited in GitHub~\\cite{our_git}.\n%\n%\n%\n%---------------------------------------------\n\n\n\n% Bibliography\n\\bibliographystyle{apsrev4-2}\n%---------------------------------------------\n%\\bibliography{refs}\n%---------------------------------------------\n%\n%apsrev4-2.bst 2019-01-14 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrev4-1.bst\n%Control: key (0)\n%Control: author (72) initials jnrlst\n%Control: editor formatted (1) identically to author\n%Control: production of article title (-1) disabled\n%Control: page (0) single\n%Control: year (1) truncated\n%Control: production of eprint (0) enabled\n\\begin{thebibliography}{61}%\n\\makeatletter\n\\providecommand \\@ifxundefined [1]{%\n \\@ifx{#1\\undefined}\n}%\n\\providecommand \\@ifnum [1]{%\n \\ifnum #1\\expandafter \\@firstoftwo\n \\else \\expandafter \\@secondoftwo\n \\fi\n}%\n\\providecommand \\@ifx [1]{%\n \\ifx #1\\expandafter \\@firstoftwo\n \\else \\expandafter \\@secondoftwo\n \\fi\n}%\n\\providecommand \\natexlab [1]{#1}%\n\\providecommand \\enquote [1]{``#1''}%\n\\providecommand \\bibnamefont [1]{#1}%\n\\providecommand \\bibfnamefont [1]{#1}%\n\\providecommand \\citenamefont [1]{#1}%\n\\providecommand \\href@noop [0]{\\@secondoftwo}%\n\\providecommand \\href [0]{\\begingroup \\@sanitize@url \\@href}%\n\\providecommand \\@href[1]{\\@@startlink{#1}\\@@href}%\n\\providecommand \\@@href[1]{\\endgroup#1\\@@endlink}%\n\\providecommand \\@sanitize@url [0]{\\catcode `\\\\12\\catcode `\\$12\\catcode\n `\\&12\\catcode `\\#12\\catcode `\\^12\\catcode `\\_12\\catcode `\\%12\\relax}%\n\\providecommand \\@@startlink[1]{}%\n\\providecommand \\@@endlink[0]{}%\n\\providecommand \\url [0]{\\begingroup\\@sanitize@url \\@url }%\n\\providecommand \\@url [1]{\\endgroup\\@href {#1}{\\urlprefix }}%\n\\providecommand \\urlprefix [0]{URL }%\n\\providecommand \\Eprint [0]{\\href }%\n\\providecommand \\doibase [0]{https://doi.org/}%\n\\providecommand \\selectlanguage [0]{\\@gobble}%\n\\providecommand \\bibinfo [0]{\\@secondoftwo}%\n\\providecommand \\bibfield [0]{\\@secondoftwo}%\n\\providecommand \\translation [1]{[#1]}%\n\\providecommand \\BibitemOpen [0]{}%\n\\providecommand \\bibitemStop [0]{}%\n\\providecommand \\bibitemNoStop [0]{.\\EOS\\space}%\n\\providecommand \\EOS [0]{\\spacefactor3000\\relax}%\n\\providecommand \\BibitemShut [1]{\\csname bibitem#1\\endcsname}%\n\\let\\auto@bib@innerbib\\@empty\n%</preamble>\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Lieberman-Aiden}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2009)\\citenamefont\n {Lieberman-Aiden}, \\citenamefont {Van~Berkum}, \\citenamefont {Williams},\n \\citenamefont {Imakaev}, \\citenamefont {Ragoczy}, \\citenamefont {Telling},\n \\citenamefont {Amit}, \\citenamefont {Lajoie}, \\citenamefont {Sabo},\n \\citenamefont {Dorschner} \\emph {et~al.}}]{lieberman2009comprehensive}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Lieberman-Aiden}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {N.~L.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Van~Berkum}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Williams}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Imakaev}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {T.}~\\bibnamefont {Ragoczy}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Telling}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {I.}~\\bibnamefont {Amit}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {B.~R.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Lajoie}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.~J.}\\\n \\bibnamefont {Sabo}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.~O.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Dorschner}}, \\emph {et~al.},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo\n {journal} {Science}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {326}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages}\n {289} (\\bibinfo {year} {2009})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Rao}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2014)\\citenamefont {Rao},\n \\citenamefont {Huntley}, \\citenamefont {Durand}, \\citenamefont {Stamenova},\n \\citenamefont {Bochkov}, \\citenamefont {Robinson}, \\citenamefont {Sanborn},\n \\citenamefont {Machol}, \\citenamefont {Omer}, \\citenamefont {Lander} \\emph\n {et~al.}}]{rao20143d}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Rao}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.~H.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Huntley}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {N.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Durand}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.~K.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Stamenova}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {I.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Bochkov}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {J.~T.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Robinson}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {A.~L.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Sanborn}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {I.}~\\bibnamefont {Machol}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {A.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Omer}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.~S.}\\\n \\bibnamefont {Lander}}, \\emph {et~al.},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal}\n {\\bibinfo {journal} {Cell}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {159}},\\ \\bibinfo\n {pages} {1665} (\\bibinfo {year} {2014})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Wang}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2016)\\citenamefont {Wang},\n \\citenamefont {Su}, \\citenamefont {Beliveau}, \\citenamefont {Bintu},\n \\citenamefont {Moffitt}, \\citenamefont {Wu},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Zhuang}}]{wang2016spatial}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Wang}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.-H.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Su}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Beliveau}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont {Bintu}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {J.~R.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Moffitt}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {C.-t.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Wu}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {X.}~\\bibnamefont {Zhuang}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield\n {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Science}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume}\n {353}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {598} (\\bibinfo {year} {2016})}\\BibitemShut\n {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Bintu}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2018)\\citenamefont {Bintu},\n \\citenamefont {Mateo}, \\citenamefont {Su}, \\citenamefont {Sinnott-Armstrong},\n \\citenamefont {Parker}, \\citenamefont {Kinrot}, \\citenamefont {Yamaya},\n \\citenamefont {Boettiger},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Zhuang}}]{bintu2018super}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Bintu}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Mateo}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.-H.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Su}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {N.~A.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Sinnott-Armstrong}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Parker}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont {Kinrot}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {K.}~\\bibnamefont {Yamaya}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~N.}\\\n \\bibnamefont {Boettiger}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {X.}~\\bibnamefont {Zhuang}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo\n {journal} {Science}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {362}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages}\n {eaau1783} (\\bibinfo {year} {2018})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Takei}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2021)\\citenamefont {Takei},\n \\citenamefont {Yun}, \\citenamefont {Zheng}, \\citenamefont {Ollikainen},\n \\citenamefont {Pierson}, \\citenamefont {White}, \\citenamefont {Shah},\n \\citenamefont {Thomassie}, \\citenamefont {Suo}, \\citenamefont {Eng} \\emph\n {et~al.}}]{takei2021integrated}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Y.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Takei}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Yun}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont {Zheng}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {N.}~\\bibnamefont {Ollikainen}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {N.}~\\bibnamefont {Pierson}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {J.}~\\bibnamefont {White}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {S.}~\\bibnamefont {Shah}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Thomassie}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont {Suo}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.-H.~L.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Eng}}, \\emph\n {et~al.},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Nature}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {590}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {344}\n (\\bibinfo {year} {2021})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Takaki}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2025)\\citenamefont {Takaki},\n \\citenamefont {Savich}, \\citenamefont {Brugu{\\'e}s},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {J{\\\"u}licher}}]{takaki2025active}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Takaki}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Y.}~\\bibnamefont {Savich}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Brugu{\\'e}s}},\\ and\\\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.}~\\bibnamefont {J{\\\"u}licher}},\\\n }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physical review\n letters}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {134}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {128401}\n (\\bibinfo {year} {2025})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Boettiger}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2016)\\citenamefont\n {Boettiger}, \\citenamefont {Bintu}, \\citenamefont {Moffitt}, \\citenamefont\n {Wang}, \\citenamefont {Beliveau}, \\citenamefont {Fudenberg}, \\citenamefont\n {Imakaev}, \\citenamefont {Mirny}, \\citenamefont {Wu},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Zhuang}}]{boettiger2016super}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~N.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Boettiger}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont {Bintu}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~R.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Moffitt}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont {Wang}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {B.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Beliveau}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Fudenberg}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Imakaev}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {L.~A.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Mirny}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.-t.}\\\n \\bibnamefont {Wu}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {X.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Zhuang}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Nature}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {529}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {418}\n (\\bibinfo {year} {2016})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Rao}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2017)\\citenamefont {Rao},\n \\citenamefont {Huang}, \\citenamefont {St~Hilaire}, \\citenamefont {Engreitz},\n \\citenamefont {Perez}, \\citenamefont {Kieffer-Kwon}, \\citenamefont {Sanborn},\n \\citenamefont {Johnstone}, \\citenamefont {Bascom}, \\citenamefont {Bochkov}\n \\emph {et~al.}}]{rao2017cohesin}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Rao}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.-C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Huang}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.~G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {St~Hilaire}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~M.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Engreitz}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.~M.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Perez}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {K.-R.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kieffer-Kwon}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {A.~L.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Sanborn}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {S.~E.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Johnstone}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {G.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Bascom}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {I.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Bochkov}}, \\emph {et~al.},\\ }\\href@noop\n {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Cell}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n {volume} {171}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {305} (\\bibinfo {year}\n {2017})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Schwarzer}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2017)\\citenamefont\n {Schwarzer}, \\citenamefont {Abdennur}, \\citenamefont {Goloborodko},\n \\citenamefont {Pekowska}, \\citenamefont {Fudenberg}, \\citenamefont {Loe-Mie},\n \\citenamefont {Fonseca}, \\citenamefont {Huber}, \\citenamefont {Haering},\n \\citenamefont {Mirny} \\emph {et~al.}}]{schwarzer2017two}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Schwarzer}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {N.}~\\bibnamefont {Abdennur}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Goloborodko}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Pekowska}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Fudenberg}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {Y.}~\\bibnamefont {Loe-Mie}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {N.~A.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Fonseca}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {W.}~\\bibnamefont {Huber}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.~H.}\\\n \\bibnamefont {Haering}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Mirny}}, \\emph {et~al.},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo\n {journal} {Nature}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {551}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages}\n {51} (\\bibinfo {year} {2017})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Kim}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2017)\\citenamefont {Kim},\n \\citenamefont {Liachko}, \\citenamefont {Brickner}, \\citenamefont {Cook},\n \\citenamefont {Noble}, \\citenamefont {Brickner}, \\citenamefont {Shendure},\\\n and\\ \\citenamefont {Dunham}}]{kim2017dynamic}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Kim}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {I.}~\\bibnamefont {Liachko}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.~G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Brickner}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.}~\\bibnamefont {Cook}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {W.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Noble}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {J.~H.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Brickner}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Shendure}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {M.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Dunham}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield\n {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Elife}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {6}},\\\n \\bibinfo {pages} {e23623} (\\bibinfo {year} {2017})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Hsieh}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2022)\\citenamefont {Hsieh},\n \\citenamefont {Cattoglio}, \\citenamefont {Slobodyanyuk}, \\citenamefont\n {Hansen}, \\citenamefont {Darzacq},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Tjian}}]{hsieh2022enhancer}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {T.-H.~S.}\\\n \\bibnamefont {Hsieh}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Cattoglio}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Slobodyanyuk}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Hansen}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {X.}~\\bibnamefont {Darzacq}},\\\n and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.}~\\bibnamefont {Tjian}},\\\n }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Nature genetics}\\\n }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {54}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1919} (\\bibinfo {year}\n {2022})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {De~Gennes}(1979)}]{de1979scaling}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.-G.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {De~Gennes}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {title} {Scaling concepts in\n polymer physics}}}\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {Cornell university press},\\\n \\bibinfo {year} {1979})\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Rubinstein}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Colby}(2003)}]{rubinstein2003polymer}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Rubinstein}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.~H.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Colby}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {title} {Polymer physics}}}\\\n (\\bibinfo {publisher} {Oxford university press},\\ \\bibinfo {year}\n {2003})\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Mirny}(2011)}]{mirny2011fractal}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.~A.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Mirny}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Chromosome Res.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {19}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {37}\n (\\bibinfo {year} {2011})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Grosberg}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1993)\\citenamefont\n {Grosberg}, \\citenamefont {Rabin}, \\citenamefont {Havlin},\\ and\\\n \\citenamefont {Neer}}]{grosberg1993crumpled}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Grosberg}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Y.}~\\bibnamefont {Rabin}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont {Havlin}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Neer}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield\n {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Europhys. Lett.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n {volume} {23}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {373} (\\bibinfo {year} {1993})}\\BibitemShut\n {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Halsey}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1986)\\citenamefont {Halsey},\n \\citenamefont {Jensen}, \\citenamefont {Kadanoff}, \\citenamefont {Procaccia},\\\n and\\ \\citenamefont {Shraiman}}]{halsey1986fractal}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {T.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Halsey}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.~H.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Jensen}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.~P.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kadanoff}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {I.}~\\bibnamefont {Procaccia}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.~I.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Shraiman}},\\ }\\href@noop {}\n {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. A}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n {volume} {33}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1141} (\\bibinfo {year}\n {1986})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Ott}(2002)}]{ott2002chaos}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Ott}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {title} {Chaos in dynamical\n systems}}}\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {Cambridge university press},\\ \\bibinfo\n {year} {2002})\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Salat}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2017)\\citenamefont {Salat},\n \\citenamefont {Murcio},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Arcaute}}]{salat2017multifractal}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Salat}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.}~\\bibnamefont {Murcio}},\\ and\\\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.}~\\bibnamefont {Arcaute}},\\ }\\href@noop\n {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physica A: Statistical\n Mechanics and its Applications}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {473}},\\\n \\bibinfo {pages} {467} (\\bibinfo {year} {2017})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Sanborn}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2015)\\citenamefont\n {Sanborn}, \\citenamefont {Rao}, \\citenamefont {Huang}, \\citenamefont\n {Durand}, \\citenamefont {Huntley}, \\citenamefont {Jewett}, \\citenamefont\n {Bochkov}, \\citenamefont {Chinnappan}, \\citenamefont {Cutkosky},\n \\citenamefont {Li} \\emph {et~al.}}]{sanborn2015chromatin}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~L.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Sanborn}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Rao}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.-C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Huang}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {N.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Durand}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {M.~H.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Huntley}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {A.~I.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Jewett}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {I.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Bochkov}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {D.}~\\bibnamefont {Chinnappan}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Cutkosky}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Li}}, \\emph {et~al.},\\ }\\href@noop {}\n {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.}\\\n }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {112}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {E6456} (\\bibinfo\n {year} {2015})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Chan}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Rubinstein}(2024)}]{chan2024activity}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Chan}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Rubinstein}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {121}},\\\n \\bibinfo {pages} {e2401494121} (\\bibinfo {year} {2024})}\\BibitemShut\n {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Frisch}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Parisi}(1980)}]{frisch1980fully}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {U.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Frisch}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Parisi}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {New\n York Academy of Sciences, Annals}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {357}},\\\n \\bibinfo {pages} {359} (\\bibinfo {year} {1980})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Benzi}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1984)\\citenamefont {Benzi},\n \\citenamefont {Paladin}, \\citenamefont {Parisi},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Vulpiani}}]{benzi1984multifractal}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Benzi}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Paladin}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Parisi}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Vulpiani}},\\ }\\href@noop {}\n {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Journal of Physics A:\n Mathematical and General}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {17}},\\ \\bibinfo\n {pages} {3521} (\\bibinfo {year} {1984})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {She}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Leveque}(1994)}]{she1994universal}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.-S.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {She}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.}~\\bibnamefont {Leveque}},\\\n }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physical review\n letters}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {72}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {336}\n (\\bibinfo {year} {1994})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Ba{\\l}yga}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Bourne}(1995)}]{balyga1995interpretation}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Ba{\\l}yga}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Bourne}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Chemical engineering science}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {50}},\\ \\bibinfo\n {pages} {381} (\\bibinfo {year} {1995})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Paladin}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Vulpiani}(1987{\\natexlab{a}})}]{paladin1987degrees}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Paladin}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Vulpiani}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Physical Review A}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {35}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages}\n {1971} (\\bibinfo {year} {1987}{\\natexlab{a}})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Paladin}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Vulpiani}(1987{\\natexlab{b}})}]{paladin1987anomalous}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Paladin}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Vulpiani}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Physics Reports}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {156}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages}\n {147} (\\bibinfo {year} {1987}{\\natexlab{b}})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Chhabra}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(1989)\\citenamefont\n {Chhabra}, \\citenamefont {Meneveau}, \\citenamefont {Jensen},\\ and\\\n \\citenamefont {Sreenivasan}}]{chhabra1989direct}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~B.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Chhabra}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.}~\\bibnamefont {Meneveau}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.~V.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Jensen}},\\ and\\\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.}~\\bibnamefont {Sreenivasan}},\\\n }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physical Review\n A}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {40}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {5284} (\\bibinfo\n {year} {1989})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Chhabra}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Jensen}(1989)}]{chhabra1989direct2}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Chhabra}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.~V.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Jensen}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Physical Review Letters}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {62}},\\ \\bibinfo\n {pages} {1327} (\\bibinfo {year} {1989})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Wink}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2008)\\citenamefont {Wink},\n \\citenamefont {Bullmore}, \\citenamefont {Barnes}, \\citenamefont {Bernard},\\\n and\\ \\citenamefont {Suckling}}]{wink2008monofractal}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.-M.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Wink}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.}~\\bibnamefont {Bullmore}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Barnes}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.}~\\bibnamefont {Bernard}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Suckling}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield\n {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Human brain mapping}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n {volume} {29}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {791} (\\bibinfo {year} {2008})}\\BibitemShut\n {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Calvet}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Fisher}(2002)}]{calvet2002multifractality}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Calvet}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Fisher}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Review\n of Economics and Statistics}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {84}},\\ \\bibinfo\n {pages} {381} (\\bibinfo {year} {2002})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Jiang}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2019)\\citenamefont {Jiang},\n \\citenamefont {Xie}, \\citenamefont {Zhou},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Sornette}}]{jiang2019multifractal}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.-Q.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Jiang}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.-J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Xie}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.-X.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Zhou}},\\ and\\\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.}~\\bibnamefont {Sornette}},\\ }\\href@noop\n {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Reports on Progress in\n Physics}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {82}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {125901}\n (\\bibinfo {year} {2019})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Jung}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2020)\\citenamefont {Jung},\n \\citenamefont {Le}, \\citenamefont {Mafwele}, \\citenamefont {Lee},\n \\citenamefont {Chae},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Lee}}]{jung2020fractality}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {N.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Jung}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Q.~A.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Le}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Mafwele}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.~M.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Lee}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {S.~Y.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Chae}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {J.~W.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Lee}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield\n {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Journal of the Korean Physical Society}\\\n }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {77}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {186} (\\bibinfo {year}\n {2020})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Murcio}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2015)\\citenamefont {Murcio},\n \\citenamefont {Masucci}, \\citenamefont {Arcaute},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Batty}}]{murcio2015multifractal}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Murcio}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~P.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Masucci}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.}~\\bibnamefont {Arcaute}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Batty}},\\ }\\href@noop {}\n {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physical Review E}\\ }\\textbf\n {\\bibinfo {volume} {92}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {062130} (\\bibinfo {year}\n {2015})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Liu}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2017)\\citenamefont {Liu},\n \\citenamefont {Wang}, \\citenamefont {Yu},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Xie}}]{liu2017fractal}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.-L.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Liu}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Wang}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Z.-G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Yu}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {X.-H.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Xie}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield\n {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Scientific reports}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n {volume} {7}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {45588} (\\bibinfo {year}\n {2017})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Pigolotti}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2020)\\citenamefont\n {Pigolotti}, \\citenamefont {Jensen}, \\citenamefont {Zhan},\\ and\\\n \\citenamefont {Tiana}}]{pigolotti2020bifractal}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Pigolotti}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.~H.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Jensen}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Y.}~\\bibnamefont {Zhan}},\\ and\\\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Tiana}},\\ }\\href@noop {}\n {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. Res.}\\ }\\textbf\n {\\bibinfo {volume} {2}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {043078} (\\bibinfo {year}\n {2020})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Lee}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2025)\\citenamefont {Lee},\n \\citenamefont {Liu}, \\citenamefont {Ziabkin},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Zidovska}}]{LEE2025}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Lee}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {X.}~\\bibnamefont {Liu}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {I.}~\\bibnamefont {Ziabkin}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Zidovska}},\\ }\\bibfield {journal}\n {\\bibinfo {journal} {Biophysical Journal}\\ }\\href\n {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.02.014}\n {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.02.014} (\\bibinfo {year} {2025}),\\\n \\bibinfo {note} {in press}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Georges}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2015)\\citenamefont\n {Georges}, \\citenamefont {Li}, \\citenamefont {Lian}, \\citenamefont\n {O'Meally}, \\citenamefont {Deakin}, \\citenamefont {Wang}, \\citenamefont\n {Zhang}, \\citenamefont {Fujita}, \\citenamefont {Patel}, \\citenamefont\n {Holleley} \\emph {et~al.}}]{CentralBeardedDragon}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Georges}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Q.}~\\bibnamefont {Li}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Lian}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {D.}~\\bibnamefont {O'Meally}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Deakin}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {Z.}~\\bibnamefont {Wang}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Zhang}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Fujita}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.~R.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Patel}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.~E.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Holleley}}, \\emph {et~al.},\\\n }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Gigascience}\\\n }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {4}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {s13742} (\\bibinfo {year}\n {2015})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Weber}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2020)\\citenamefont {Weber},\n \\citenamefont {Park}, \\citenamefont {Luria}, \\citenamefont {Jeon},\n \\citenamefont {Kim}, \\citenamefont {Jeon}, \\citenamefont {Bhak},\n \\citenamefont {Jun}, \\citenamefont {Kim}, \\citenamefont {Hong} \\emph\n {et~al.}}]{WhaleShark}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~A.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Weber}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Park}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {V.}~\\bibnamefont {Luria}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont {Jeon}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {H.-M.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kim}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {Y.}~\\bibnamefont {Jeon}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Y.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Bhak}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~H.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Jun}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~W.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kim}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.~H.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Hong}}, \\emph {et~al.},\\\n }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Proceedings of the\n National Academy of Sciences}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {117}},\\ \\bibinfo\n {pages} {20662} (\\bibinfo {year} {2020})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Hirakawa}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2016)\\citenamefont\n {Hirakawa}, \\citenamefont {Kaur}, \\citenamefont {Shirasawa}, \\citenamefont\n {Nichols}, \\citenamefont {Nagano}, \\citenamefont {Appels}, \\citenamefont\n {Erskine},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Isobe}}]{Clover}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Hirakawa}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.}~\\bibnamefont {Kaur}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.}~\\bibnamefont {Shirasawa}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.}~\\bibnamefont {Nichols}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont {Nagano}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {R.}~\\bibnamefont {Appels}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {W.}~\\bibnamefont {Erskine}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~N.}\\\n \\bibnamefont {Isobe}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo\n {journal} {Scientific Reports}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {6}},\\ \\bibinfo\n {pages} {30358} (\\bibinfo {year} {2016})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{WAG(2025)}]{WAGA}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\href@noop {} {\\bibinfo {title} {{Western Australia Genome Atlas}}},\\\n \\bibinfo {howpublished} {\\url{https://www.dnazoo.org/waga}} (\\bibinfo {year}\n {2025}),\\ \\bibinfo {note} {accessed: 2025-11-14}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Dudchenko}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2017)\\citenamefont\n {Dudchenko}, \\citenamefont {Batra}, \\citenamefont {Omer}, \\citenamefont\n {Nyquist}, \\citenamefont {Hoeger}, \\citenamefont {Durand}, \\citenamefont\n {Shamim}, \\citenamefont {Machol}, \\citenamefont {Lander}, \\citenamefont\n {Aiden} \\emph {et~al.}}]{dudchenko2017novo}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {O.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Dudchenko}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Batra}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Omer}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~K.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Nyquist}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Hoeger}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {N.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Durand}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {M.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Shamim}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {I.}~\\bibnamefont {Machol}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {E.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Lander}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~P.}\\\n \\bibnamefont {Aiden}}, \\emph {et~al.},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal}\n {\\bibinfo {journal} {Science}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {356}},\\ \\bibinfo\n {pages} {92} (\\bibinfo {year} {2017})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Dudchenko}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2018)\\citenamefont\n {Dudchenko}, \\citenamefont {Shamim}, \\citenamefont {Batra}, \\citenamefont\n {Durand}, \\citenamefont {Musial}, \\citenamefont {Mostofa}, \\citenamefont\n {Pham}, \\citenamefont {Glenn St~Hilaire}, \\citenamefont {Yao}, \\citenamefont\n {Stamenova}, \\citenamefont {Hoeger}, \\citenamefont {Nyquist}, \\citenamefont\n {Korchina}, \\citenamefont {Pletch}, \\citenamefont {Flanagan}, \\citenamefont\n {Tomaszewicz}, \\citenamefont {McAloose}, \\citenamefont {P{\\'e}rez~Estrada},\n \\citenamefont {Novak}, \\citenamefont {Omer},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Aiden}}]{Dudchenko254797}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {O.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Dudchenko}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Shamim}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Batra}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {N.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Durand}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {N.~T.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Musial}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {R.}~\\bibnamefont {Mostofa}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Pham}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Glenn St~Hilaire}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Yao}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.}~\\bibnamefont {Stamenova}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Hoeger}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~K.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Nyquist}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {V.}~\\bibnamefont {Korchina}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {K.}~\\bibnamefont {Pletch}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {J.~P.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Flanagan}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Tomaszewicz}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {D.}~\\bibnamefont {McAloose}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {C.}~\\bibnamefont {P{\\'e}rez~Estrada}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {B.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Novak}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~D.}\\\n \\bibnamefont {Omer}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.~L.}\\\n \\bibnamefont {Aiden}},\\ }\\href {https://doi.org/10.1101/254797} {\\bibfield\n {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {bioRxiv}\\ ,\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {254797}}\n (\\bibinfo {year} {2018})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Hoencamp}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2021)\\citenamefont\n {Hoencamp}, \\citenamefont {Dudchenko}, \\citenamefont {Elbatsh}, \\citenamefont\n {Brahmachari}, \\citenamefont {Raaijmakers}, \\citenamefont {van Schaik},\n \\citenamefont {Sede{\\~n}o~Cacciatore}, \\citenamefont {Contessoto},\n \\citenamefont {van Heesbeen}, \\citenamefont {van~den Broek} \\emph\n {et~al.}}]{hoencamp20213d}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Hoencamp}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {O.}~\\bibnamefont {Dudchenko}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~M.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Elbatsh}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont {Brahmachari}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {J.~A.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Raaijmakers}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {T.}~\\bibnamefont {van Schaik}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {{\\'A}.}~\\bibnamefont {Sede{\\~n}o~Cacciatore}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {V.~G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Contessoto}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.~G.}\\ \\bibnamefont {van Heesbeen}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont {van~den Broek}}, \\emph {et~al.},\\\n }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Science}\\ }\\textbf\n {\\bibinfo {volume} {372}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {984} (\\bibinfo {year}\n {2021})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {G{\\\"u}rsoy}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2014)\\citenamefont\n {G{\\\"u}rsoy}, \\citenamefont {Xu}, \\citenamefont {Kenter},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Liang}}]{gursoy2014spatial}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont\n {G{\\\"u}rsoy}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Y.}~\\bibnamefont {Xu}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~L.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Kenter}},\\ and\\\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Liang}},\\ }\\href@noop {}\n {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Nucleic acids research}\\ }\\textbf\n {\\bibinfo {volume} {42}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {8223} (\\bibinfo {year}\n {2014})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Chan}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Rubinstein}(2023)}]{chan2023theory}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Chan}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Rubinstein}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {120}},\\\n \\bibinfo {pages} {e2222078120} (\\bibinfo {year} {2023})}\\BibitemShut\n {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Nagano}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2013)\\citenamefont {Nagano},\n \\citenamefont {Lubling}, \\citenamefont {Stevens}, \\citenamefont\n {Schoenfelder}, \\citenamefont {Yaffe}, \\citenamefont {Dean}, \\citenamefont\n {Laue}, \\citenamefont {Tanay},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Fraser}}]{nagano2013single}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {T.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Nagano}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {Y.}~\\bibnamefont {Lubling}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {T.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Stevens}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont {Schoenfelder}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {E.}~\\bibnamefont {Yaffe}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont\n {W.}~\\bibnamefont {Dean}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.~D.}\\\n \\bibnamefont {Laue}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Tanay}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Fraser}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Nature}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {502}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {59}\n (\\bibinfo {year} {2013})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Halverson}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2011)\\citenamefont\n {Halverson}, \\citenamefont {Lee}, \\citenamefont {Grest}, \\citenamefont\n {Grosberg},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Kremer}}]{halverson2011molecular}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Halverson}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.~B.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Lee}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Grest}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~Y.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Grosberg}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.}~\\bibnamefont {Kremer}},\\ }\\href@noop {}\n {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {The Journal of chemical physics}\\\n }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {134}} (\\bibinfo {year} {2011})}\\BibitemShut\n {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Grosberg}(2014)}]{grosberg2014annealed}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~Y.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Grosberg}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Soft\n Matter}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {10}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {560} (\\bibinfo\n {year} {2014})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Rosa}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Everaers}(2017)}]{rosa2017beyond}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Rosa}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Everaers}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Physical Review E}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {95}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages}\n {012117} (\\bibinfo {year} {2017})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Smrek}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Grosberg}(2013)}]{smrek2013novel}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Smrek}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~Y.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Grosberg}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n {volume} {392}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {6375} (\\bibinfo {year}\n {2013})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Halverson}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2014)\\citenamefont\n {Halverson}, \\citenamefont {Smrek}, \\citenamefont {Kremer},\\ and\\\n \\citenamefont {Grosberg}}]{halverson2014melt}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Halverson}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont {Smrek}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.}~\\bibnamefont {Kremer}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~Y.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Grosberg}},\\ }\\href@noop {}\n {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Rep. Prog. Phys.}\\ }\\textbf\n {\\bibinfo {volume} {77}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {022601} (\\bibinfo {year}\n {2014})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Rosa}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Everaers}(2019)}]{rosa2019conformational}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Rosa}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Everaers}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {The\n European Physical Journal E}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {42}},\\ \\bibinfo\n {pages} {7} (\\bibinfo {year} {2019})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Fudenberg}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2016)\\citenamefont\n {Fudenberg}, \\citenamefont {Imakaev}, \\citenamefont {Lu}, \\citenamefont\n {Goloborodko}, \\citenamefont {Abdennur},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Mirny}}]{fudenberg2016formation}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Fudenberg}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont {Imakaev}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {C.}~\\bibnamefont {Lu}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Goloborodko}}, \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {N.}~\\bibnamefont {Abdennur}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author}\n {\\bibfnamefont {L.~A.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Mirny}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield\n {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Cell reports}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume}\n {15}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {2038} (\\bibinfo {year} {2016})}\\BibitemShut\n {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Kantelhardt}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2002)\\citenamefont\n {Kantelhardt}, \\citenamefont {Zschiegner}, \\citenamefont {Koscielny-Bunde},\n \\citenamefont {Havlin}, \\citenamefont {Bunde},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Stanley}}]{kantelhardt2002multifractal}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~W.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Kantelhardt}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~A.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Zschiegner}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Koscielny-Bunde}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Havlin}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Bunde}},\\ and\\\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.~E.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Stanley}},\\\n }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physica A:\n Statistical Mechanics and its Applications}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume}\n {316}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {87} (\\bibinfo {year} {2002})}\\BibitemShut\n {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Gibcus}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Dekker}(2013)}]{gibcus2013hierarchy}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~H.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Gibcus}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Dekker}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Molecular cell}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {49}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {773}\n (\\bibinfo {year} {2013})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Bernenko}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2023)\\citenamefont\n {Bernenko}, \\citenamefont {Lee}, \\citenamefont {Stenberg},\\ and\\\n \\citenamefont {Lizana}}]{bernenko2023mapping}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Bernenko}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~H.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Lee}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.}~\\bibnamefont {Stenberg}},\\ and\\\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.}~\\bibnamefont {Lizana}},\\ }\\href@noop {}\n {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {PLOS Computational Biology}\\\n }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {19}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {e1011185} (\\bibinfo\n {year} {2023})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Knight}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Ruiz}(2013)}]{knight2013fast}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.~A.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Knight}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.}~\\bibnamefont {Ruiz}},\\\n }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {IMA Journal of\n Numerical Analysis}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {33}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages}\n {1029} (\\bibinfo {year} {2013})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Durand}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2016)\\citenamefont {Durand},\n \\citenamefont {Robinson}, \\citenamefont {Shamim}, \\citenamefont {Machol},\n \\citenamefont {Mesirov}, \\citenamefont {Lander},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n {Aiden}}]{DURAND201699}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {N.~C.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Durand}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~T.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Robinson}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Shamim}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {I.}~\\bibnamefont {Machol}},\n \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~P.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Mesirov}}, \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Lander}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo\n {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.~L.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Aiden}},\\ }\\href\n {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2015.07.012} {\\bibfield\n {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Cell Systems}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume}\n {3}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {99} (\\bibinfo {year} {2016})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Falconer}(1994)}]{falconer1994multifractal}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.~J.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n {Falconer}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Journal of theoretical Probability}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {7}},\\\n \\bibinfo {pages} {681} (\\bibinfo {year} {1994})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Fornberg}(1988)}]{fornberg1988generation}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont\n {Fornberg}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n {Math. Comput.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {51}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {699}\n (\\bibinfo {year} {1988})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\bibitem [{our(2026)}]{our_git}%\n \\BibitemOpen\n \\href@noop {} {\\bibinfo {title} {{All code for numerical calculations in this\n Git repository: [https://github.com/lizanalab/yang2026MF].}}} (\\bibinfo\n {year} {2026})\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\end{thebibliography}%\n\n%\n%---------------------------------------------\n\\end{document}\n\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091198,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31998"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31998"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Mohammad-Hassan Naddaf"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"M. H. Naddaf, M. Ghasemnezhad, H. Ghanbarnejad, D. Hutsem\\'ekers, and B. Czerny"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Radiation-pressure instability is an artifact of constant-$\\alpha$ closure"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"4 pages + appendix (4 pages), 2 figures, A&A Letters"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IM"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"The standard $\\alpha$-disk formalism parametrizes turbulent angular momentum transport through a dimensionless coefficient $\\alpha$, assumed to be spatially and thermodynamically invariant. While analytically convenient, this assumption leads to the well-known thermal and viscous instabilities in radiation-pressure dominated (RPD) regions. We show that this instability is not the consequence of radiation pressure, but is due to enforcing a constant $\\alpha$ across distinct thermodynamic regimes. Requiring the steady thin-disk (TD) to remain thermally stable and single-valued in the $\\dot{M}$--$\\Sigma$ plane yields a necessary condition on the stress response, expressed as $\\eta_{\\rm x} \\equiv d\\ln\\alpha_{\\rm x}\\,/\\,d\\ln X > 4/7$, where $X \\equiv P_{\\rm gas}/P_{\\rm rad}$. The resulting viscosity law $\\alpha_{\\rm x} \\equiv \\alpha(X)$ emerges directly from the internal consistency of TD equations, without modifying the stress law or invoking any additional physics. $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ removes the RPD unstable branch. The disk structure becomes smooth and globally single-valued, with higher $\\Sigma$ and $\\tau$ in the inner RPD disk, while preserving the standard effective-temperature profile. This increases thermal and inflow timescales, offering a natural route to accretion-state dependent variability without large-amplitude radiation-pressure limit cycles. It also motivates revisiting AGN disk tensions, including microlensing sizes and continuum reverberation lags with improved radiative-transfer modeling. The results show that the RPD instability, and possibly some associated AGN disk tensions, reflect an inconsistent viscosity closure."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:33:19 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:33:19 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Naddaf","M. H.",""],["Ghasemnezhad","M.",""],["Ghanbarnejad","H.",""],["Hutsemékers","D.",""],["Czerny","B.",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Naddaf\",\n \"M. H.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Ghasemnezhad\",\n \"M.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Ghanbarnejad\",\n \"H.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Hutsemékers\",\n \"D.\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Czerny\",\n \"B.\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: aa.cls\n================================================\n%%\n%% This is file `aa.cls',\n%% generated with the docstrip utility.\n%%\n%% The original source files were:\n%%\n%% aa.dtx (with options: `aa')\n%% \n%% aa.dtx\n%% Copyright EDP Sciences (2025), J.-C. Charpentier (2010), all rights reserved.\n%% Class `aa' to use with LaTeX 2e\n%% \\CharacterTable\n%% {Upper-case \\A\\B\\C\\D\\E\\F\\G\\H\\I\\J\\K\\L\\M\\N\\O\\P\\Q\\R\\S\\T\\U\\V\\W\\X\\Y\\Z\n%% Lower-case \\a\\b\\c\\d\\e\\f\\g\\h\\i\\j\\k\\l\\m\\n\\o\\p\\q\\r\\s\\t\\u\\v\\w\\x\\y\\z\n%% Digits \\0\\1\\2\\3\\4\\5\\6\\7\\8\\9\n%% Exclamation \\! Double quote \\\" Hash (number) \\#\n%% Dollar \\$ Percent \\% Ampersand \\&\n%% Acute accent \\' Left paren \\( Right paren \\)\n%% Asterisk \\* Plus \\+ Comma \\,\n%% Minus \\- Point \\. Solidus \\/\n%% Colon \\: Semicolon \\; Less than \\<\n%% Equals \\= Greater than \\> Question mark \\?\n%% Commercial at \\@ Left bracket \\[ Backslash \\\\\n%% Right bracket \\] Circumflex \\^ Underscore \\_\n%% Grave accent \\` Left brace \\{ Vertical bar \\|\n%% Right brace \\} Tilde \\~}\n%%\n\\def\\filedate{2025/11/27}\n\\let\\aafiledate\\filedate\n\\def\\fileversion{9.4}\n\\let\\aafileversion\\fileversion\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1995/06/01]\n\\ProvidesClass{aa}\n [\\filedate{} v\\fileversion{} Class for AA journal]\n\\LoadClass[fleqn]{article}\n\\newif\\ifaa@letter\n\\DeclareOption{letter}{\\aa@lettertrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@onlletter\n\\DeclareOption{onlletter}{\\aa@onllettertrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@online\n\\DeclareOption{online}{\\aa@onlinetrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@referee\n\\DeclareOption{referee}{\\aa@refereetrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@contents\n\\DeclareOption{contents}{\\aa@contentstrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@contentsAut\n\\DeclareOption{contentsAut}{\\aa@contentsAuttrue}\n\\newlength\\aa@fullwidth\n\\newlength\\aa@fullheight\n\\DeclareOption{a4paper}{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@paper{a4paper}%\n \\setlength\\aa@fullwidth{184mm}%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@leftmarginpaper{(21cm-\\aa@fullwidth)/2}%\n \\setlength\\aa@fullheight{705pt}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{letterpaper}{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@paper{letterpaper}\n \\setlength\\aa@fullwidth{184mm}%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@leftmarginpaper{(8.5in-\\aa@fullwidth)/2}%\n \\setlength\\aa@fullheight{705pt-1.76cm}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{legalpaper}{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@paper{legalpaper}%\n \\setlength\\aa@fullwidth{184mm}%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@leftmarginpaper{(8.5in-\\aa@fullwidth)/2}%\n \\setlength\\aa@fullheight{705pt}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@paper{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@leftmarginpaper{}\n\\newif\\ifaa@twocolumn\n\\DeclareOption{onecolumn}{%\n \\aa@twocolumnfalse\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@column{onecolumn}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{twocolumn}{%\n \\aa@twocolumntrue\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@column{twocolumn}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@column{}\n\\newif\\if@wideboxfn\n\\@wideboxfnfalse\n\\DeclareOption{wideboxfn}{\\@wideboxfntrue}\n%\n\\newif\\if@wideboxlafn\n\\@wideboxlafnfalse\n\\DeclareOption{wideboxlafn}{\\@wideboxlafntrue}\n%\n\\newif\\ifaa@longfn\n\\DeclareOption{longfn}{\\aa@longfntrue}\n\\newif\\ifaa@longauth\n\\DeclareOption{longauth}{\\aa@longauthtrue}\n\\let\\if@myobjects\\iffalse\n\\DeclareOption{ascii}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[ascii]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{latin1}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[latin1]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{latin9}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[latin9]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{ansinews}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[ansinews]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{applemac}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[applemac]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{utf8}{%\n \\def\\aa@inputenc{\\RequirePackage[utf8]{inputenc}}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@font{}\n\\DeclareOption{cm}{%\n \\def\\aa@font{%\n \\RequirePackage{textcomp}%\n }%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{showoverfull}{\\setlength\\overfullrule{5\\p@}}\n\\DeclareOption{hideoverfull}{\\setlength\\overfullrule{\\z@}}\n\\DeclareOption{openbib}{%\n \\AtEndOfPackage{%\n \\renewcommand\\@openbib@code{%\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\bibindent\n \\itemindent -\\bibindent\n \\listparindent \\itemindent\n \\parsep \\z@\n }%\n \\renewcommand\\newblock{\\par}}%\n}\n\\newif\\ifaa@bibnumber\n\\DeclareOption{bibnumber}{\\aa@bibnumbertrue%\n \\def\\aa@biblio{%\n \\RequirePackage[sort&compress]{natbib}\n \\bibpunct{[}{]}{,}{n}{}{,}%\n \\def\\@biblabel##1{##1.}%\n \\bibliographystyle{plainnat}%\n \\def\\bibfont{\\aa@bibliographyfont}%\n \\setlength{\\bibsep}{\\z@}%\n }\n}\n\\DeclareOption{bibauthoryear}{%\n \\def\\aa@biblio{%\n \\RequirePackage[nonamebreak]{natbib}\n \\bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}%\n \\def\\bibfont{\\aa@bibliographyfont}%\n \\setlength{\\bibsep}{\\z@}%\n }%\n}\n\\DeclareOption{bibyear}{%\n \\def\\aa@biblio{%\n \\def\\@biblabel##1{}%\n \\def\\@cite##1##2{{##1\\if@tempswa , ##2\\fi}}%\n }\n}\n\\ExecuteOptions{a4paper,twocolumn,utf8,hideoverfull,bibauthoryear}\n\\ProcessOptions\n\\RequirePackage{calc}\n\\RequirePackage{etex}\n\\RequirePackage[T1]{fontenc}\n\\aa@inputenc\n\\aa@font\n\\ifaa@referee\n\\RequirePackage{xcolor}\n\\RequirePackage{marginnote}\n\\AtEndOfClass{\n\\setlength{\\marginparwidth}{50mm}\n\\setlength{\\marginparsep}{5mm}\n}\n%\n\\newcounter{lenote}\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n\\@ifpackageloaded{hyperref}%\n{\\newcommand{\\LEm}[1]{\\texorpdfstring{\\protect\\stepcounter{lenote}{\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}] }}\n\\protect\\marginnote{\\baselineskip3ex{\\normalsize{\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}: #1]}}}}}{}}\n\\newcommand{\\LEt}[1]{\\texorpdfstring{\\protect\\stepcounter{lenote}{\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}: #1] }}}{}}}%\n{\\newcommand{\\LEm}[1]{\\protect\\stepcounter{lenote}{\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}] }}\n\\protect\\marginnote{\\baselineskip3ex{\\normalsize{\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}: #1]}}}}}\n\\newcommand{\\LEt}[1]{\\protect\\stepcounter{lenote}{\\normalfont\\textbf{\\color{red}[Note \\arabic{lenote}: #1] }}}}%\n}\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@column{onecolumn}\n \\aa@twocolumnfalse\n \\setlength{\\aa@fullwidth}{0.75\\aa@fullwidth}\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@leftmarginpaper{15mm}\n \\if!\\csname appendix\\endcsname!\\AtEndDocument{\\listofobjects}\\fi\n\\fi\n\\ifx\\pdfoutput\\undefined\n \\newcount\\pdfoutput\n\\fi\n\\ifnum\\pdfoutput=\\z@\n \\newcommand\\aa@driver{dvips}\n\\else\n \\newcommand\\aa@driver{pdftex}\n\\fi\n\\RequirePackage[\\aa@driver, \\aa@paper, left=\\aa@leftmarginpaper,\n \\ifaa@twocolumn\\aa@column\\fi, \\ifaa@referee\\else twoside,\\fi\n textheight=\\aa@fullheight,headheight=12pt,headsep=12pt,\n footskip=20pt,\n textwidth=\\aa@fullwidth, columnsep=4mm,\n marginpar=0in, marginparsep=0in]{geometry}\n\\RequirePackage{setspace}\n\\ifaa@referee\n \\doublespacing\n\\fi\n\\RequirePackage{fancyhdr}\n\\RequirePackage{cuted}\n\\RequirePackage[tbtags,fleqn]{amsmath}\n\\RequirePackage{amssymb}\n\\setlength{\\mathindent}{\\z@}\n\\ifaa@letter\n \\RequirePackage{xcolor}\n\\fi\n\\RequirePackage{url, enumerate}\n\\RequirePackage{longtable}\n\\renewcommand*\\LT@makecaption[3]{%\n \\LT@mcol\\LT@cols\n c{\\hbox to\\z@{%\n \\hss\\parbox[t]\\LTcapwidth{%\n \\aa@longtablecaptionfont\n \\sbox\\@tempboxa{%\n #1{{\\aa@longtableheadcaptionfont#2.} }#3%\n }%\n \\ifdim\\wd\\@tempboxa>\\hsize\n #1{{\\aa@longtableheadcaptionfont#2.} }#3%\n \\else\n \\hbox to\\hsize{\\box\\@tempboxa\\hfil}%\n \\fi\n \\endgraf\\vskip\\baselineskip\n }%\n \\hss\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\aa@biblio\n\\RequirePackage{xspace}\n\\RequirePackage[english]{babel}\n\\def\\aatolm#1{\\gdef\\@aatolm{#1}}\n\\def\\@aatolm{}\n\\renewenvironment{appendix}{\\par\\clearpage%\n\\aa@savefootnote \\csname c@footnote\\endcsname \\relax%\n\\aatolm{1}\n\\def\\@hangfrom##1{\\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{{##1}}%\n \\hangindent \\parindent\\noindent\\box\\@tempboxa}\n\\def\\sectcounterend{:}\n\\def\\@seccntformat##1{\\csname theap##1\\endcsname%\n \\hskip\\betweenumberspace}\n \\setcounter{section}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{figure}{0}%\n \\setcounter{table}{0}%\n \\newcommand\\theapsection{\\appendixname\\ \\@Alph\\c@section\\sectcounterend}%\n \\newcommand\\theapsubsection{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\@arabic\\c@subsection.}%\n \\newcommand\\theapsubsubsection{\\theapsubsection\\@arabic\\c@subsubsection.}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesection{\\@Alph\\c@section}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesubsection{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\@arabic\\c@subsection}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesubsubsection{\\thesubsection.\\@arabic\\c@subsubsection}%\n \\renewcommand\\theequation{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\@arabic\\c@equation}%\n \\renewcommand\\thefigure{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\@arabic\\c@figure}%\n \\renewcommand\\thetable{\\@Alph\\c@section.\\@arabic\\c@table}%\n \\@addtoreset{equation}{section}%\n \\@addtoreset{figure}{section}%\n \\@addtoreset{table}{section}%\n \\ifaa@longauth\\ifnum\\aa@nbauthors>10\\relax%\n \\nolinenumbers\n \\if@wideboxlafn\n \\setlength\\bibindent{1.4\\parindent}\n \\else\n \\setlength\\bibindent{\\parindent}\n \\fi\n \\renewcommand*\\thefootnote{\\@fnsymbol\\c@footnote}\n \\csname c@footnote\\endcsname \\aa@savethanks \\relax\n \\setcounter{footnote}{\\aa@savethanks}\t\n \\begin{aa@strip}\n \\section*{Authors and affiliations}%\n \\aaauthorname%\n \\aainstitutename%\n %\\addvspace{2\\aa@afterauthorskip}\n \\end{aa@strip}\n \\@thanks\n \\clearpage%\n \\setlength\\bibindent{1em}\n \\renewcommand*\\thefootnote{\\@arabic\\c@footnote}\n \\csname c@footnote\\endcsname \\aa@savefootnote \\relax\n \\setcounter{footnote}{\\aa@savefootnote}\n \\fi\\fi\\linenumbers%\n}\n{\n \\setcounter{section}{0}%\n \\setcounter{subsection}{0}%\n \\setcounter{figure}{0}%\n \\setcounter{table}{0}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesection{\\@arabic\\c@section}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesubsection{\\@arabic\\c@subsection}%\n \\renewcommand\\thesubsubsection{\\@arabic\\c@subsubsection}%\n \\renewcommand\\theequation{\\@arabic\\c@equation}%\n \\renewcommand\\thefigure{\\@arabic\\c@figure}%\n \\renewcommand\\thetable{\\@arabic\\c@table}%\n}\n\\RequirePackage[figuresright]{rotating}\n\\newcount\\aa@cnta\n\\newcount\\aa@cntb\n\\newcount\\aa@nbwords\n\\newcount\\aa@nbauthors\n\\newcount\\aa@nbinstitutes\n\\newcommand*\\aa@traditabstractmax{300}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@structabstractmax{300}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywordsmax{6}\n\\newcounter{aa@institutecnt}\n\\newcount\\aa@savecounter\n\\newcount\\aa@savefootnote\n\\newcount\\aa@savethanks\n\\newlength{\\aa@dima}\n\\newlength{\\aa@dimb}\n\\newlength{\\aa@dimc}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@removefootnoteindentspace{-1.5em}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@removefootnotewbindentspace{-2.25em}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logoruleindent{8\\p@}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logoruleraise{4\\p@}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logorulelength{78\\p@}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logorulethick{1\\p@}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logoraise{25\\p@}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logoraiserest{14.5\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTheorem}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTheorem}{8\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceAfterTheorem}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceAfterTheorem}{8\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 2\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\HSpaceIndentTheorem}\n\\setlength{\\HSpaceIndentTheorem}{\\z@}\n\\newlength{\\HVSpaceSepTheorem}\n\\setlength{\\HVSpaceSepTheorem}{0.25em}\n\\newlength{\\aa@securityheadmargin}\n\\setlength{\\aa@securityheadmargin}{2cm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@bleedmargin}\n\\setlength{\\aa@bleedmargin}{5mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@voffsetlettername}\n\\setlength{\\aa@voffsetlettername}{2.55cm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@hoffsetlettername}\n\\setlength{\\aa@hoffsetlettername}{2mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@hoffsetgray}\n\\setlength{\\aa@hoffsetgray}{3mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftercontentsnameskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftercontentsnameskip}{12\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftercontentsAutnameskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftercontentsAutnameskip}{12\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforeheadboxskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforeheadboxskip}{-20\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterheadboxskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterheadboxskip}{49\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforetopicsskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforetopicsskip}{18\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftertopicsskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftertopicsskip}{32\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterletternameskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterletternameskip}{6mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforeletternameskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforeletternameskip}{-4.8mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforeheadnoteskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforeheadnoteskip}{-12\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterheadnoteskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterheadnoteskip}{3.5mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftertitleskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftertitleskip}{10\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforesubtitleskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforesubtitleskip}{7\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftersubtitleskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftersubtitleskip}{10\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterauthorskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterauthorskip}{16.5\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforedefaultheadnoteskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforedefaultheadnoteskip}{2pt}\n\\newlength{\\aa@headingleftmargin}\n\\setlength{\\aa@headingleftmargin}{8mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@headingrightmargin}\n\\setlength{\\aa@headingrightmargin}{8mm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterinstituteskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterinstituteskip}{8\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@instituteindent}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterdateskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterdateskip}{16.5\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterdedicationskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterdedicationskip}{16.5\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterabstractnameskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterabstractnameskip}{9\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterabstractskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterabstractskip}{6\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}{\\z@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afterkeywordsskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afterkeywordsskip}{24\\p@}\n\\newlength{\\aa@beforeacknowledgementsskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@beforeacknowledgementsskip}{6pt}\n\\newlength{\\aa@afteracknowledgementsskip}\n\\setlength{\\aa@afteracknowledgementsskip}{6pt}\n\\newlength{\\aa@figgap}\n\\setlength{\\aa@figgap}{12pt}\n\\newlength{\\aa@sidecaptionminwidth}\n\\setlength{\\aa@sidecaptionminwidth}{5cm}\n\\newlength{\\aa@sidecaptionwidth}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceBeforeFigCaption}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceBeforeFigCaption}{5pt}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceAfterTabCaption}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceAfterTabCaption}{10pt}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTabBib}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTabBib}{2ex}\n\\newlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTabFoot}\n\\setlength{\\VSpaceBeforeTabFoot}{2ex}\n\\newlength{\\aftertext}\n\\setlength{\\aftertext}{5pt}\n\\newlength{\\aa@entryboxwidth}\n\\setlength{\\aa@entryboxwidth}{8mm}\n\\newlength{\\betweenumberspace}\n\\setlength{\\betweenumberspace}{3.33pt}\n\\newif\\ifaa@structabstract\n\\newif\\ifaa@numberedtheorem\n\\newif\\ifaa@firstonline\n\\aa@firstonlinetrue\n\\newcommand*\\journalname[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@journalname{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@journalname{Astronomy \\& Astrophysics}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@manuscriptname{%\n manuscript no. \\jobname\n \\hspace{\\stretch{1}}%\n \\copyright ESO \\the\\year\n}\n\\def\\Num{1}\n\\def\\Vol{1}\n\\def\\Month{JANUARY~I}\n\\newcommand*\\AANum[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@numarticle{#1}%\n\\gdef\\@AANum{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\@AANum{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@numarticle{Article number}\n\\newcommand*\\doi[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@doi{DOI: #1}%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@doifig{#1}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@doi{(DOI: will be inserted by hand later)}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@doifig{(to add)}\n\\newcommand*\\AALogo{%\n \\settowidth{\\aa@dima}{\\aa@logo@astrophysicsfont Astrophysics}%\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{%\n \\begin{minipage}{\\aa@dima}\n \\aa@logo@astronomyfont Astronomy\\\\\n \\raisebox{\\aa@logoraise}{%\n \\parbox[c][0pt]{\\z@}{%\n \\rlap{%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@logoruleindent}%\n \\aa@logo@andfont \\&%\n \\rule[\\aa@logoruleraise]{\\aa@logorulelength}{\\aa@logorulethick}%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n \\raisebox{\\aa@logoraiserest}{\\aa@logo@astrophysicsfont Astrophysics}\n \\end{minipage}%\n }%\n \\copy0%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@pageof{, page \\thepage{}}\n\\newcommand*{\\aa@publishlink}{\\hfil%\n Article published by EDP Sciences%\n \\hfil}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@topicsname{Special feature}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@offprintsname{Send offprint requests to\\/}\n\\newcommand*\\listobjectname{List of Objects}\n\\addto\\captionsenglish{\\renewcommand*\\figurename{Fig.}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@figtype{figure}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tabtype{table}\n\\newcommand*\\lettername{Letter to the Editor}\n\\newcommand*\\noteaddname{Note added in proof.}\n\\def\\noteadd{\\par\\addvspace{17pt}\\rm\n\\trivlist\\item[\\hskip\\labelsep\n{\\it\\noteaddname}]}\n\\def\\endnoteadd{\\endtrivlist\\addvspace{6pt}}\n\\newcommand*\\andname{\\unskip, }\n\\newcommand*\\andlastname{\\unskip, and }\n\\newcommand*\\andtwoname{\\unskip\\ and }\n\\newcommand*\\etalname{et al.}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@contentsname{Contents sorted by section}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@contentsAutname{Contents sorted by first author}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@pagename{page}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@AAname{A\\&A}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@copyrightname{\\copyright~ESO}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractiname{Context}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractiiname{Aims}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractiiiname{Methods}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractivname{Results}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractvname{Conclusions}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywordname{Key words}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@acknowledgementsname{Acknowledgements}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@floatcounterend{.~}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablebibname{References}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablefootname{Notes}\n\\renewcommand\\normalsize{%\n \\@setfontsize\\normalsize\\@xpt{11}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 8.55\\p@ \\@plus4\\p@ \\@minus5\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus3\\p@\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 6\\p@ \\@plus3\\p@ \\@minus3\\p@\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n \\let\\@listi\\@listI}\n\\normalsize\n\\renewcommand\\small{%\n \\@setfontsize\\small\\@ixpt{10}%\n \\abovedisplayskip 8.5\\p@ \\@plus3\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\abovedisplayshortskip \\z@ \\@plus2\\p@\n \\belowdisplayshortskip 4\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus2\\p@\n \\def\\@listi{\\leftmargin\\leftmargini\n \\parsep 0\\p@ \\@plus1\\p@ \\@minus1\\p@\n \\topsep 8\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\itemsep0\\p@}%\n \\belowdisplayskip \\abovedisplayskip\n}\n\\let\\footnotesize\\small\n\\renewcommand\\scriptsize{\\@setfontsize\\scriptsize\\@viipt\\@viiipt}\n\\renewcommand\\tiny{\\@setfontsize\\tiny\\@viiipt\\@ixpt}\n\\renewcommand\\large{\\@setfontsize\\large\\@xipt{13}}\n\\renewcommand\\Large{\\@setfontsize\\Large\\@xivpt{16}}\n\\renewcommand\\LARGE{\\@setfontsize\\LARGE\\@xviipt{20}}\n\\renewcommand\\huge{\\@setfontsize\\huge\\@xxpt{24}}\n\\renewcommand\\Huge{\\@setfontsize\\Huge\\@xxvpt{30}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@footfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subabstractfont{\\small\\sffamily\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@abstractfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@offprintsnamefont{\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logo@astronomyfont{\\fontsize{18}{21}\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logo@andfont{\\fontsize{16}{12}\\sffamily\\mdseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@logo@astrophysicsfont{\\fontsize{18}{21}\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@letternamefont{\\sffamily\\fontsize{19.2\\p@}{21\\p@}\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headletternamefont{\\large\\scshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@contentsnamefont{\\Large\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@contentsAutnamefont{\\Large\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@journalnamefont{\\slshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@manuscriptnamefont{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@todayheadboxfont{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@msnrheadboxfont{\\LARGE\\bfseries\\smash}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@textidlineempty{{\\slshape A\\&A proofs:}\\ manuscript no.~\\jobname}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@idlinefont{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@doifont{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@copyrightfont{\\small}\n\\ifaa@letter\n \\definecolor{aa@colorletter}{gray}{0.6}\n\\fi\n\\newcommand*\\aa@topicsfont{\\fontsize{12}{14}\\sffamily\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@topicsnamefont{\\fontsize{17}{20}\\sffamily}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headnotefont{\\LARGE\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@defaultheadnotefont{\\LARGE\\sffamily\\bfseries\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@titlefont{\\LARGE \\sffamily\\bfseries\\boldmath}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subtitlefont{\\Large \\sffamily\\bfseries\\boldmath}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@authorfont{\\large}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@institutefont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@datefont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@dedicationfont{\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@abstractnamefont{\\small\\sffamily\\bfseries\\MakeUppercase}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywordnamefont{\\small\\sffamily\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywordfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@longauthfont{\\centering\\small\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@longauthname{Affiliations can be found after the references}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@appauthaffname{Full author list and affiliations details can be found after the references}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@longauthopen{(}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@longauthclose{)}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@acknowledgementsfont{\\tiny}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@acknowledgementsnamefont{\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@bibliographyfont{\\tiny}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@captionfont{\\normalfont\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headcaptionfont{\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablebibfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablebibnamefont{\\small\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablefootfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tablefootnamefont{\\small\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@descriptionlabelfont{}\n\\newcommand\\aa@longtablecaptionfont{\\small}\n\\newcommand\\aa@longtableheadcaptionfont{\\small\\bfseries}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@emailfont{\\ttfamily}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@entryifont{\\itshape}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@entryiifont{\\bfseries}\n\\newtoks\\authorlink\n\\newtoks\\yearCop\n\\newbox\\aa@stripbox\n\\newbox\\aa@outputbox\n\\newenvironment{aa@strip}\n{%\n \\onecolumn\\parindent0mm\n \\setbox\\aa@stripbox=\\vbox\\bgroup\n}\n{%\n \\egroup\n \\aa@@strip\n}\n\\def\\aa@@strip{%\n \\ifdim\\ht\\aa@stripbox>\\textheight\n \\global\\setbox\\aa@outputbox=\\vsplit\\aa@stripbox to \\textheight\n \\dp\\aa@outputbox \\z@\n \\box\\aa@outputbox\\clearpage\n \\expandafter\\aa@@strip\n \\else\n \\dp\\aa@stripbox \\z@\n \\twocolumn[\\box\\aa@stripbox]\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand{\\ErratumOf}[3][]{}\n\\newcommand{\\NoteFor}[3][]{}\n\\renewcommand*\\@fnsymbol[1]{%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\ifcase#1\n \\or\\star\n \\or{\\star}{\\star}\n \\or{\\star}{\\star}{\\star}%\n \\or{\\star}{\\star}{\\star}{\\star}\n \\or \\ddagger\n \\or \\dagger\\dagger\n \\or \\ddagger\\ddagger \n \\or \\mathsection\n \\or \\mathparagraph\n \\or \\|\n \\or **\n \\or \\dagger\n \\else \\@ctrerr\n \\fi\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand\\longempty{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@cntwords[1]{%\n \\protected@edef\\aa@cntwords@arg{#1\\space\\noexpand\\aa@nil\\space}%\n \\aa@nbwords \\z@\n \\let\\@@protect\\protect\n \\let\\protect\\@unexpandable@protect\n \\expandafter\\aa@@cntwords\\aa@cntwords@arg\n \\restore@protect\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@nnil{\\aa@nil}\n\\long\\def\\aa@@cntwords#1 {%\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\aa@nnil\n \\else\n \\advance\\aa@nbwords \\@ne\n \\expandafter\\aa@@cntwords\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@roheadletter{%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dima}\n {1in + \\topmargin + \\headheight - \\dp\\strutbox +\n 2\\aa@bleedmargin}%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dimb}\n {\\paperwidth - (1in + \\oddsidemargin + \\textwidth) +\n \\aa@bleedmargin - \\aa@hoffsetgray}%\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\aa@letternamefont \\lettername}%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dimc}\n {\\paperheight - \\aa@dima - \\wd0 + 2\\aa@bleedmargin}%\n \\addtolength{\\aa@voffsetlettername}{0.5cm}\n \\leavevmode\n \\hbox to0pt{%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@hoffsetgray}%\n \\vbox to0pt{%\n \\hsize=\\aa@dimb\n \\vskip-\\aa@dima\n \\colorbox{aa@colorletter}{%\n \\vtop{%\n \\vspace*{\\aa@voffsetlettername}%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@hoffsetlettername}%\n \\rotatebox{90}{\\aa@letternamefont \\lettername}%\n \\hfill\\null\n \\vspace*{\\aa@dimc}%\n }%\n }%\n \\vss\n }%\n \\hss\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@leheadletter{%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dima}\n {1in + \\topmargin + \\headheight - \\dp\\strutbox +\n 2\\aa@bleedmargin}%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dimb}\n {1in + \\oddsidemargin + \\aa@bleedmargin - \\aa@hoffsetgray}%\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\aa@letternamefont \\lettername}%\n \\setlength{\\aa@dimc}\n {\\paperheight-\\aa@dima-\\wd0+2\\aa@bleedmargin}%\n \\addtolength{\\aa@voffsetlettername}{0.5cm}\n \\leavevmode\n \\hspace*{-2\\fboxsep}%\n \\hbox to0pt{%\n \\hss\n \\vbox to0pt{%\n \\hsize=\\aa@dimb\n \\vskip-\\aa@dima\n \\colorbox{aa@colorletter}{%\n \\vtop{%\n \\vspace*{\\aa@voffsetlettername}%\n \\hfill\n \\rotatebox{90}{\\aa@letternamefont \\lettername}%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@hoffsetlettername}%\n \\vspace*{\\aa@dimc}%\n }%\n }%\n \\vss\n }%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@hoffsetgray}%\n }%\n}\n\\ifaa@online\n \\fancypagestyle{firstpage}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\fancyfoot[RO]{\\aa@footfont\\aa@publishlink\\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof}%\n \\fancyfoot[LE]{\\aa@footfont\\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof\\qquad\\aa@publishlink}%\n }\n\\else\n \\fancypagestyle{firstpage}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\fancyfoot[RO]{\\aa@footfont \\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof}%\n \\fancyfoot[LE]{\\aa@footfont \\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof}%\n }\n\\fi\n\\ifaa@contents\n \\fancypagestyle{otherpage}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\fancyhead[C]{\\aa@AAname}%\n \\fancyfoot[C]{\\aa@contentsname, \\aa@pagename\\space \\thepage}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n }\n\\else\\ifaa@contentsAut\n \\fancypagestyle{otherpage}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\fancyhead[C]{\\aa@AAname}%\n \\fancyfoot[C]{\\aa@contentsAutname, \\aa@pagename\\space \\thepage}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n }\n\\else\n \\fancypagestyle{otherpage}{%\n \\fancyhf{}%\n \\fancyhead[CO]{\\aa@headfont \\aa@headings}%\n \\fancyhead[CE]{\\aa@headfont \\ifx\\aa@idline\\empty\\aa@textidlineempty\\else\\aa@idline\\fi}%\n \\fancyfoot[RO]{\\aa@footfont \\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof}%\n \\fancyfoot[LE]{\\aa@footfont \\aa@numarticle\\aa@pageof}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\headrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n \\renewcommand*{\\footrulewidth}{\\z@}%\n }\n\\fi\\fi\n\\pagestyle{otherpage}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headings{}\n\\renewcommand*\\date[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@date{#1}}%\n\\newcommand*\\aa@date{\\today}\n\\renewcommand*\\title[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@title{#1}}%\n\\newcommand*\\aa@title{}\n\\newcommand*\\subtitle[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@subtitle{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@subtitle{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@tenauthors{}\n\\renewcommand*\\author[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@author{#1}%\n \\begingroup\n \\let\\and\\relax\n \\renewcommand*\\inst[1]{\\unskip}%\n \\renewcommand*\\thanks[1]{\\unskip}%\n \\renewcommand*\\email[1]{\\unskip}%\n \\renewcommand*\\fnmsep{\\unskip}%\n \\renewcommand*\\textsuperscript[1]{\\unskip}%\n \\ifx\\orcid\\undefined\\relax\\else%\n \\renewcommand*\\orcid[1]{\\unskip}%\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\orcidlink\\undefined\\relax\\else%\n \\renewcommand*\\orcidlink[1]{\\unskip}%\n \\fi\n \\let\\@@protect\\protect\n \\let\\protect\\@unexpandable@protect\n \\global\\aa@nbauthors \\z@\n \\expandafter\\aa@cntauthors\\aa@author\\and\\aa@nil\\and\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbauthors>10\n \\expandafter\\aa@extracttenauthor\\aa@author\\and\\aa@nil\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@tenauthors{\\aa@tenauthors}%\n \\fi\n \\restore@protect\n \\endgroup\n}%\n\\newcommand*\\aa@author{}\n\\def\\aa@cntauthors#1\\and{%\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\aa@nnil\n \\else\n \\global\\advance\\aa@nbauthors \\@ne\n \\expandafter\\aa@cntauthors\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\institute[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@institute{#1}\n \\begingroup\n \\let\\and\\relax\n \\renewcommand*\\inst[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\thanks[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\email[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\textsuperscript[1]{}\n \\let\\@@protect\\protect\n \\let\\protect\\@unexpandable@protect\n \\global\\aa@nbinstitutes \\z@\n \\expandafter\\aa@cntinstitutes\\aa@institute\\and\\aa@nil\\and\n \\restore@protect\n \\endgroup\n}%\n\\newcommand*\\aa@institute{}\n\\def\\aa@cntinstitutes#1\\and{%\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\aa@nnil\n \\else\n \\global\\advance\\aa@nbinstitutes \\@ne\n \\expandafter\\aa@cntinstitutes\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\inst[1]{\\unskip\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont$#1$}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fnmsep{\\unskip\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont,}}}\n\\newcommand*\\email[1]{e-mail: {\\aa@emailfont #1}}\n\\newcommand*{\\corrauth}[1]{\\thanks{Corresponding author: {\\aa@emailfont #1}}}\n\\let\\endabstract\\relax\n\\renewcommand\\abstract[1]{%\n \\renewcommand\\aa@abstract@i{#1}%\n \\@ifnextchar\\bgroup{\\aa@abstract@next}{\\aa@abstract@one}\n}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@next[4]{%\n \\aa@structabstracttrue\n \\renewcommand\\aa@abstract@ii{#1}%\n \\renewcommand\\aa@abstract@iii{#2}%\n \\renewcommand\\aa@abstract@iv{#3}%\n \\renewcommand\\aa@abstract@v{#4}%\n \\begingroup\n \\renewcommand\\thanks[1]{}%\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@abstractwords{%\n \\aa@abstract@i \\space\n \\aa@abstract@ii \\space\n \\aa@abstract@iii \\space\n \\aa@abstract@iv \\space\n \\aa@abstract@v \\space\n }%\n \\endgroup\n \\aa@cnta \\z@\n \\aa@cntb \\aa@structabstractmax\n \\aa@abstract@cnt\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@abstract@one{%\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@abstractwords{\\aa@abstract@i}%\n \\aa@cnta \\z@\n \\aa@cntb \\aa@traditabstractmax\n \\aa@abstract@cnt\n}\n\\def\\aa@abstract@cnt{%\n \\aa@cntwords\\aa@abstractwords\n \\advance\\aa@nbwords \\aa@cnta\\relax\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbwords>\\aa@cntb\n \\typeout{^^J^^JIMPORTANT}\n \\ClassWarning{aa}\n {Around \\the\\aa@nbwords\\space words in the abstract instead\n of \\the\\aa@cntb\\space (max). You should rewrite your abstract}\n \\typeout{IMPORTANT\n ^^J}\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@i{}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@ii{}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@iii{}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@iv{}\n\\newcommand\\aa@abstract@v{}\n\\newcommand*\\keywords[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@keywords{#1}%\n \\aa@keywords@cnt\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbwords>\\aa@keywordsmax\n \\ClassWarning{aa}\n {\\the\\aa@nbwords\\space keywords instead of a maximum of\n \\aa@keywordsmax\\space}\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywords{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@doublehyphen{--}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@keywords@cnt{%\n \\protected@edef\\aa@@keywords{\\aa@keywords--\\noexpand\\aa@nil--}%\n \\aa@nbwords \\z@\n \\let\\@@protect\\protect\n \\let\\protect\\@unexpandable@protect\n \\expandafter\\aa@@keywords@cnt\\aa@@keywords\n \\restore@protect\n}\n\\def\\aa@@keywords@cnt#1--{%\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\aa@nnil\n \\else\n \\advance\\aa@nbwords \\@ne\n \\expandafter\\aa@@keywords@cnt\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\topics[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@topics{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@topics{}\n\\newcommand*\\titlerunning[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@titlerunning{#1}\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@titlerunning{}\n\\newcommand*\\authorrunning[1]{%\n \\renewcommand*\\aa@authorrunning{#1}\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@authorrunning{}\n\\newcommand*\\offprints[1]{%\n \\protected@edef\\@thanks{%\n \\@thanks\n \\protect\\footnotetext[0]{%\n \\unskip%\n \\if@wideboxfn%\n \\hspace{\\aa@removefootnotewbindentspace}%\n \\else%\n \\hspace{\\aa@removefootnoteindentspace}%\n \\fi\n {%\n \\aa@offprintsnamefont\n \\aa@offprintsname\n }: \\ignorespaces#1%\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\def\\aainstitutename{\\par\n \\begingroup\n \\renewcommand*\\and{%\n \\\\%\n \\refstepcounter{aa@institutecnt}%\n \\hangindent\\aa@instituteindent\n \\noindent\n \\hbox to-0.001\\aa@instituteindent%\n {%\n \\hss\n \\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont\\theaa@institutecnt}}%\n \\enspace\n }%\n \\ignorespaces\n }%\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbinstitutes>99\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont888}}\\enspace}%\n \\else\\ifnum\\aa@nbinstitutes>9\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont88}}\\enspace}%\n \\else\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont8}}\\enspace}%\n \\fi\\fi\n \\aa@instituteindent \\wd0\n {%\n \\aa@institutefont\n \\par\\refstepcounter{aa@institutecnt}%\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbinstitutes=1\\relax\n \\noindent\\ignorespaces\n \\else\n \\hangindent\\aa@instituteindent\n \\noindent\n \\hbox to\\aa@instituteindent{%\n \\hss\n \\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont\\theaa@institutecnt}}%\n \\enspace\n }\\ignorespaces%\n \\fi%\n \\aa@institute\\par\n }\n \\endgroup}\n\\def\\aaauthorname{\\par\n\\begingroup \n \\ifnum\\aa@nbauthors=\\tw@\n \\let\\and\\andtwoname\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\and{%\n \\advance\\aa@cnta \\@ne\n \\ifnum\\aa@cnta=\\aa@nbauthors\n \\andlastname\n \\else\n \\andname\n \\fi\n }\n \\fi\n \\aa@cnta \\@ne\n {\\renewcommand*\\email[1]{\\unskip}\n \\aa@authorfont\\centering\\aa@author\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afterauthorskip} \n\\endgroup}\n\\newcommand*\\mail[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@mail{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@mail{}\n\\newcommand*\\msnr[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@msnr{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@msnr{}\n\\newcommand*\\idline[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@idline{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@idline{}\n\\newcommand*\\headnote[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@headnote{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@headnote{}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@defaultheadnote{Corrigendum}\n\\newcommand*\\dedication[1]{\\renewcommand*\\aa@dedication{#1}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@dedication{}\n\\renewcommand*\\maketitle{%\n \\thispagestyle{firstpage}\n\\begingroup\n \\if@wideboxfn\n \\setlength\\bibindent{1.4\\parindent}\n \\else\n \\setlength\\bibindent{\\parindent}\n \\fi\n \\renewcommand*\\thefootnote{\\@fnsymbol\\c@footnote}%\n \\renewcommand\\@makefntext[1]{%\n \\ifaa@longfn\\hsize\\textwidth\\fi\n \\noindent\n \\hb@xt@\\bibindent{\\hss\\@makefnmark\\enspace}##1}\n \\ifaa@twocolumn\n \\begingroup\n \\twocolumn[\\aa@maketitle]\n \\@thanks\n \\endgroup\n \\else\n \\begingroup\n \\let\\thanks\\footnote\n \\aa@maketitle\n \\endgroup\n \\fi\n\\endgroup\n \\aa@savethanks \\csname c@footnote\\endcsname \\relax%\n \\let\\@thanks\\@empty%\n \\setcounter{footnote}{0}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@maketitle{%\n \\ifaa@contents\n {\\aa@contentsnamefont \\aa@contentsname\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftercontentsnameskip}\n \\else\\ifaa@contentsAut\n {\\aa@contentsAutnamefont \\aa@contentsAutname\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftercontentsAutnameskip}\n \\else\n \\vbox to0pt{\\vskip\\aa@beforeheadboxskip\n \\nointerlineskip\n \\ifx\\aa@idline\\empty\n \\noindent\n \\fbox{%\n \\begin{minipage}{\\linewidth-2\\fboxsep-2\\fboxrule}\n \\strut\n {\\aa@journalnamefont \\aa@journalname}\n {\\aa@manuscriptnamefont \\aa@manuscriptname}\\\\\n \\ifx\\aa@msnr\\empty\n {\\strut\\aa@todayheadboxfont \\today}%\n \\else\n \\makebox[0.75\\linewidth][r]{%\n \\strut\n {\\aa@msnrheadboxfont \\aa@msnr}%\n }%\n \\fi\n \\end{minipage}%\n }%\n \\else\n \\begin{tabular}[b]{@{}l@{}}\n \\aa@idlinefont \\aa@idline\\\\\n \\aa@doifont \\aa@doi\\\\\n \\aa@copyrightfont \\aa@copyrightname~\\if!\\the\\yearCop!\\the\\year\\else\\the\\yearCop\\fi\n \\end{tabular}\n \\hfill\\AALogo\n \\fi\\vss}\n \\par\n \\ifx\\aa@topics\\empty%\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afterheadboxskip}\n \\else\n \\addvspace{\\aa@beforetopicsskip}\n {\\noindent\\aa@topicsfont \\aa@topics}%\n \\hfill\n {\\aa@topicsnamefont \\aa@topicsname\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftertopicsskip}\n \\fi\n \\begingroup\n \\centering\n \\ifaa@letter\n \\ifx\\aa@topics\\empty\n \\addvspace{1.8\\aa@beforeletternameskip}\n \\else\n \\addvspace{\\aa@beforeletternameskip}\n \\fi\n {\\aa@headletternamefont \\lettername\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afterletternameskip}\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\aa@headnote\\empty\\else\n \\ifx\\aa@headnote\\aa@defaultheadnote\\else\n {\\aa@headnotefont \\aa@headnote\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afterheadnoteskip}\n \\fi\n \\fi\n {\\aa@titlefont \\aa@title\\par}\n \\ifx\\aa@subtitle\\empty%\n \\ifx\\aa@headnote\\aa@defaultheadnote\n {\\aa@defaultheadnotefont (\\aa@headnote)\\par}\n \\fi\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftertitleskip}\n \\else\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftertitleskip}\n {\\aa@subtitlefont \\aa@subtitle\\par}\n \\ifx\\aa@headnote\\aa@defaultheadnote\n \\addvspace{\\aa@beforedefaultheadnoteskip}\n {\\aa@defaultheadnotefont (\\aa@headnote)\\par}\n \\fi\n \\addvspace{\\aa@aftersubtitleskip}\n \\fi\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbauthors=\\tw@\n \\let\\and\\andtwoname\n \\else\n \\renewcommand\\and{%\n \\advance\\aa@cnta \\@ne\n \\ifnum\\aa@cnta=\\aa@nbauthors\n \\andlastname\n \\else\n \\andname\n \\fi\n }\n \\fi\n \\aa@cnta \\@ne\n \\ifaa@longauth\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbauthors>10%\n {\\aa@authorfont \\aa@tenauthors\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterinstituteskip}\n {\\noindent\\aa@longauthfont%\n \\aa@longauthopen\\aa@appauthaffname\\aa@longauthclose\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afterauthorskip}\n \\else\n {\\renewcommand*\\email[1]{\\unskip}\n \\aa@authorfont \\aa@author\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afterauthorskip}\n \\fi\n \\else\n {\\renewcommand*\\email[1]{\\unskip}\n \\aa@authorfont \\aa@author\\par}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afterauthorskip}\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\begingroup\n \\ifaa@longauth\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbauthors>10\\relax%\n \\else\n \\addvspace{-10pt}\n {\\noindent\\aa@longauthfont%\n \\aa@longauthopen\\aa@longauthname\\aa@longauthclose\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterinstituteskip}\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\leftskip \\aa@headingleftmargin\n \\rightskip \\aa@headingrightmargin\n \\aainstitutename\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterinstituteskip}\n \\fi\n {\\noindent\\aa@datefont\\ifaa@longauth\\centering\\fi \\aa@date\\par}\n \\ifx\\aa@dedication\\empty\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterdateskip}\n \\else\n \\addvspace\\baselineskip\n {\\noindent\\aa@dedicationfont \\aa@dedication\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterdedicationskip}\n \\fi\n {\\centering\\aa@abstractnamefont \\abstractname\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterabstractnameskip}\n \\ifaa@structabstract\n \\ifx\\aa@abstract@i\\longempty\\else\n {\\noindent\\aa@subabstractfont \\aa@subabstractiname. }%\n {\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@i\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}\n \\fi\n {\\noindent\\aa@subabstractfont \\aa@subabstractiiname. }%\n {\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@ii\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}\n {\\noindent\\aa@subabstractfont \\aa@subabstractiiiname. }%\n {\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@iii\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}\n {\\noindent\\aa@subabstractfont \\aa@subabstractivname. }%\n {\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@iv\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@aftersubabstractskip}\n \\ifx\\aa@abstract@v\\longempty\\else\n {\\noindent\\aa@subabstractfont \\aa@subabstractvname. }%\n {\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@v\\par}\n \\fi\n \\else\n {\\noindent\\aa@abstractfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@abstract@i\\par}\n \\fi\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterabstractskip}\n \\ifx\\aa@keywords\\empty\\else\n \\noindent\n {\\aa@keywordnamefont \\aa@keywordname. }\n {\\aa@keywordfont \\ignorespaces\\aa@keywords\\par}\n \\vspace{\\aa@afterkeywordsskip}\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\renewcommand*\\thanks[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\inst[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\fnmsep{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\and{, }%\n \\renewcommand*\\email[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\textsuperscript[1]{}\n \\ifx\\orcid\\undefined\\relax\\else%\n \\renewcommand*\\orcid[1]{\\unskip}%\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\orcidlink\\undefined\\relax\\else%\n \\renewcommand*\\orcidlink[1]{\\unskip}%\n \\fi\n \\renewcommand*\\\\{ }%\n \\renewcommand*\\vspace[1]{}%\n \\renewcommand*\\offprints[1]{}%\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@PDFauthor{\\if!\\the\\authorlink!\\aa@author\\else\\the\\authorlink\\fi}%\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@PDFtitle{\\noexpand\\protect\\noexpand\\aa@title}%\n \\def\\object##1{##1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@authorrunning\\empty\n \\let\\and\\relax\n \\renewcommand*\\\\{\\unskip\\space\\ignorespaces}%\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbauthors=1\n \\expandafter\\aa@extractoneauthor\\aa@author\\and\\aa@nil\n \\else\\ifnum\\aa@nbauthors=2\n \\expandafter\\aa@extracttwoauthor\\aa@author\\and\\aa@nil\n \\else\n \\expandafter\\aa@extractoneauthor\\aa@author\\and\\aa@nil\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@headings{\\aa@headings\\unskip\\space\\etalname\\space}%\n \\fi\\fi\n \\else\n \\xdef\\aa@headings{\\aa@authorrunning}%\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\aa@titlerunning\\empty\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@headings{\\aa@headings\\unskip: \\aa@title}%\n \\else\n \\protected@xdef\\aa@headings{\\aa@headings\\unskip: \\aa@titlerunning}%\n \\fi\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{%\n \\hspace*{\\aa@securityheadmargin}%\n \\aa@headfont \\aa@headings\n }%\n \\ifdim\\wd0>\\aa@fullwidth\n \\typeout{^^J^^JIMPORTANT}\n \\ClassWarning{aa}\n {The running head built automatically\n from \\string\\author\\space and \\string\\title\n exceeds the pagewidth, please supply a shorter form\n with \\string\\authorrunning\\space and/or\n \\string\\titlerunning\\space prior to \\string\\maketitle}\n {Use \\string\\titlerunning\\space to supply a shorter\n title and/or \\string\\authorrunning\\space to supply a\n shorter list of authors.}%\n \\typeout{IMPORTANT\n ^^J}\n \\fi\n \\fi\\fi\n}\n\\def\\aa@extractoneauthor#1\\and#2\\aa@nil{%\n \\gdef\\aa@headings{#1}%\n}\n\\def\\aa@extracttwoauthor#1\\and#2\\and#3\\aa@nil{%\n \\gdef\\aa@headings{#1\\andtwoname#2}%\n}\n\\def\\aa@extracttenauthor#1\\and#2\\and#3\\and#4\\and#5\\and#6\\and#7\\and#8\\and#9\\aa@nil{%\n \\gdef\\aa@tenauthors{#1\\unskip, #2\\unskip, #3\\unskip, #4\\unskip, #5\\unskip, #6\\unskip, #7\\unskip, #8\\unskip, et~al.}%\n}\n\\def\\sectcounterend{.}\n\\def\\@seccntformat#1{\\csname the#1\\endcsname\\sectcounterend\n\\hskip\\betweenumberspace}\n\\def\\@sect#1#2#3#4#5#6[#7]#8{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth\n \\let\\@svsec\\@empty\n \\else\n \\refstepcounter{#1}%\n \\protected@edef\\@svsec{\\@seccntformat{#1}\\relax}%\n \\fi\n \\@tempskipa #5\\relax\n \\ifdim \\@tempskipa>\\z@\n \\begingroup\n #6{%\n \\@hangfrom{\\hskip #3\\relax\\@svsec}%\n \\raggedright\n \\hyphenpenalty \\@M%\n \\interlinepenalty \\@M #8\\@@par}%\n \\endgroup\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}%\n \\fi\n #7}%\n \\else\n \\def\\@svsechd{%\n #6{\\hskip #3\\relax\n \\@svsec #8\\hskip\\aftertext}%\n \\csname #1mark\\endcsname{#7}%\n \\addcontentsline{toc}{#1}{%\n \\ifnum #2>\\c@secnumdepth \\else\n \\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}%\n \\fi\n #7}}%\n \\fi\n \\@xsect{#5}}\n\\ifaa@contentsAut\n \\renewcommand\\section{%\n \\@startsection{section}\n {1}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd \\@plus-4\\p@ \\@minus-4\\p@}\n {6dd}\n {\\large\\bfseries\\boldmath\\MakeUppercase}%\n }\n\\else\\ifaa@contents\n \\renewcommand\\section{%\n \\@startsection{section}\n {1}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd \\@plus-4\\p@ \\@minus-4\\p@}\n {6dd}\n {\\large\\bfseries\\boldmath\\MakeUppercase}%\n }\n\\else\n \\renewcommand\\section{%\n \\@startsection{section}\n {1}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd\\@plus-4\\p@ \\@minus-4\\p@}\n {6dd}\n {\\large\\sffamily\\bfseries\\boldmath}%\n }\n\\fi\\fi\n\\renewcommand\\subsection{%\n \\@startsection{subsection}\n {2}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd}\n {6dd}\n {\\normalsize\\sffamily\\itshape}%\n}\n\\renewcommand\\subsubsection{%\n \\@startsection{subsubsection}\n {3}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd}\n {6dd}\n {\\normalsize\\sffamily}%\n}\n\\renewcommand\\paragraph{%\n \\@startsection{paragraph}\n {4}\n {\\z@}\n {-16dd}\n {-\\fontdimen2\\font\n \\@plus-\\fontdimen3\\font\n \\@minus-\\fontdimen4\\font}\n {\\normalsize\\sffamily}%\n}\n\\renewcommand\\subparagraph{%\n \\ClassError{aa}{Command \\string\\subparagrap\\space isn't allowed}\n {Only commands from \\string\\section\\space to\n \\string\\paragraph\\space are allowed.}\n}\n\\renewcommand\\part{%\n \\ClassError{aa}{Command \\string\\part\\space isn't allowed}\n {Only commands from \\string\\section\\space to\n \\string\\paragraph\\space are allowed.}\n}\n\\frenchspacing\n\\clubpenalty=10000\n\\widowpenalty=10000\n\\flushbottom\n\\ifaa@twocolumn\n \\sloppy\n\\fi\n\\newenvironment{nopar}\n {\\let\\par\\relax%\n \\aa@acknowledgementsfont\n {%\n \\noindent\\aa@acknowledgementsnamefont\n \\aa@acknowledgementsname.%\n }%\n \\hskip.5em\n }{}\n\\newenvironment{acknowledgements}\n {%\n \\par\\addvspace{\\aa@beforeacknowledgementsskip}\n \\begin{spacing}{0.81}\n \\begin{nopar}\n }\n {%\n \\end{nopar}\n \\end{spacing}\n \\addvspace{\\aa@afteracknowledgementsskip}\n }\n\\let\\acknowledgement\\acknowledgements\n\\let\\endacknowledgement\\endacknowledgements\n\\renewcommand\\@makefntext[1]{%\n \\noindent\n \\hb@xt@\\bibindent{\\hss\\@makefnmark\\enspace}#1}\n\\newcommand\\listofobjects{\\if@myobjects%\n \\section*{\\listobjectname}\n \\@starttoc{obj}\\fi%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\l@obj[2]{\\noindent`#1' on page #2\\par}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand{\\object}[1]{%\n #1\\global\\let\\if@myobjects\\iftrue%\n \\addcontentsline{obj}{obj}{#1}%\n}\n\\newcommand\\longtab[2][]{%\n\\if!\\@aatolm!\n \\aalongfloat{table}{#2}%\n\\else\n \\aalongfloat[#1]{section}{#2}%\n\\fi\n}\n\\newcommand\\aalongfloat[3][]{%\n \\AtEndDocument{%\n \\aa@savecounter \\csname c@#2\\endcsname \\relax\n \\csname c@#2\\endcsname\n }%\n \\edef\\aa@nombre{\\number\\csname c@#2\\endcsname}%\n\\if!\\@aatolm!\n \\expandafter\\AtEndDocument\\expandafter{%\n \\aa@nombre\\relax\n \\setlength{\\LTcapwidth}{\\textwidth}\n \\onecolumn\n #3%\n \\twocolumn\n \\csname c@#2\\endcsname \\aa@savecounter \\relax\n }%\n \\stepcounter{#2}%\n\\else\n \\expandafter\\AtEndDocument\\expandafter{%\n \\aa@nombre\\relax\n \\setlength{\\LTcapwidth}{\\textwidth}\n \\onecolumn\n\\setcounter{table}{#1}\\addtocounter{table}{-1}\n\\renewcommand\\thesection{\\Alph{section}}%\n\\renewcommand\\thetable{\\thesection.\\arabic{table}}\n #3%\n \\twocolumn\n \\csname c@#2\\endcsname \\aa@savecounter \\relax\n }%\n \\setcounter{table}{#1}\n\\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@defineentry{%\n \\newcommand{\\entry}[3]{%\n \\par\\noindent\n {\\aa@entryiifont ##2}%\n \\par\n {%\n \\noindent\n \\raggedright\n {\\aa@entryifont ##1}%\n \\hfill\n \\rlap{\\makebox[\\aa@entryboxwidth][l]{\\hfill##3}}%\n \\par\n }%\n \\vspace{\\aftertext}\n }\n}\n\\ifaa@contents \\aa@defineentry \\fi\n\\ifaa@contentsAut \\aa@defineentry \\fi\n\\renewcommand\\@listi{%\n \\leftmargin \\leftmargini\n \\parsep \\z@ \\@plus\\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n \\topsep 8\\p@ \\@plus2\\p@ \\@minus4\\p@\n \\itemsep \\parsep\n}\n\\let\\listI\\@listi\n\\@listi\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\let\\@listi\\listI\n \\@listi\n}\n\\renewcommand\\@listii{%\n \\leftmargin \\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth \\leftmarginii\n \\advance\\labelwidth -\\labelsep\n \\topsep \\z@\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\itemsep \\z@\n}\n\\renewcommand\\@listiii{%\n \\leftmargin \\leftmarginiii\n \\labelwidth \\leftmarginiii\n \\advance\\labelwidth -\\labelsep\n \\topsep \\z@\n \\parsep \\z@\n \\itemsep \\z@\n \\partopsep \\p@ \\@minus\\p@\n }\n\\newcommand*\\aa@setitemindent[1]{%\n \\settowidth{\\labelwidth}{\\aa@descriptionlabelfont #1}%\n \\leftmargini \\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmargini \\labelsep\n \\renewcommand*\\@listi{%\n \\leftmargin \\leftmargini\n \\labelwidth \\leftmargini\n \\advance\\labelwidth -\\labelsep\n \\parsep \\parskip\n \\topsep \\medskipamount\n \\itemsep \\parskip\n \\advance\\itemsep -\\parsep\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@setitemitemindent[1]{%\n \\settowidth{\\labelwidth}{\\aa@descriptionlabelfont #1}%\n \\leftmarginii \\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmarginii \\labelsep\n \\renewcommand*\\@listii{%\n \\leftmargin \\leftmarginii\n \\labelwidth \\leftmarginii\n \\advance\\labelwidth -\\labelsep\n \\parsep \\parskip\n \\topsep \\z@\n \\itemsep \\parskip\n \\advance\\itemsep -\\parsep\n }%\n}\n\\renewcommand*\\descriptionlabel[1]{\\hspace\\labelsep #1\\hfil}\n\\renewcommand*\\description{%\n \\@ifnextchar[{\\aa@description} % ] (pour Emacs)\n {%\n \\list{}{%\n \\labelwidth\\z@\n \\itemindent -\\leftmargin\n \\let\\makelabel\\descriptionlabel\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand\\aa@description[1][]{%\n \\relax\\ifnum\\@listdepth=0\n \\aa@setitemindent{#1}%\n \\else\\ifnum\\@listdepth=1\n \\aa@setitemitemindent{#1}%\n \\fi\\fi\n \\list{--}{\\let\\makelabel\\aa@descriptionlabel}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@descriptionlabel[1]{%\n \\aa@descriptionlabelfont\n #1%\n \\hfil\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@theorem@aftercount{.}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@theorem@aftertitle{.}\n\\renewcommand*\\newtheorem{%\n \\@ifstar{\\aa@theorem@withstar}{\\aa@theorem@nostar}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@theorem@nostar{%\n \\aa@numberedtheoremtrue\n \\aa@newtheorem\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@theorem@withstar{%\n \\aa@numberedtheoremfalse\n \\aa@newtheorem\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@newtheorem[1]{%\n \\def\\aa@theorem@name{#1}%\n \\expandafter\\newif\\csname ifaa@theorem@#1@numbered\\endcsname\n \\ifaa@numberedtheorem\n \\csname aa@theorem@#1@numberedtrue\\endcsname\n \\fi\n \\aa@@newtheorem\n}\n\\newif\\ifaa@newcounter\n\\newcommand*\\aa@@newtheorem[2][]{%\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\empty\n \\expandafter\\edef\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname\n {AA\\aa@theorem@name}%\n \\aa@newcountertrue\n \\else\n \\expandafter\\ifx\n \\csname aa@theorem@#1@title\\endcsname\n \\relax\n \\ClassError{aa}\n {#1 isn't a theorem-like environment}\n {You have to create #1 with \\string\\newtheorem\\space\n before use its counter.}%\n \\expandafter\\edef\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname\n {AA\\aa@theorem@name}%\n \\aa@newcountertrue\n \\else\n \\expandafter\\def\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname\n {AA#1}%\n \\aa@newcounterfalse\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\expandafter\\newcommand\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @title\\endcsname\n {#2}%\n \\aa@@@newtheorem\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@@@newtheorem[3][]{%\n \\ifaa@newcounter\n \\def\\aa@arg{#1}%\n \\ifx\\aa@arg\\empty\n \\newcounter{\\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname}%\n \\else\n \\newcounter{\\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname}[#1]%\n \\expandafter\\xdef\n \\csname theaa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter\\endcsname{%\n \\expandafter\\noexpand\\csname the#1\\endcsname.%\n \\noexpand\\arabic{aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @counter}%\n }%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\expandafter\\newcommand\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @titlefont\\endcsname{#2}%\n \\expandafter\\newcommand\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\aa@theorem@name @bodyfont\\endcsname{#3}%\n \\newenvironment{\\aa@theorem@name}[1][]{%\n \\def\\aa@theorem@optionnal{##1}%\n \\par\\addvspace{\\VSpaceBeforeTheorem}%\n \\noindent\\hspace*{\\HSpaceIndentTheorem}%\n \\begingroup\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\@currenvir @titlefont\\endcsname\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\@currenvir @title\\endcsname\n \\csname ifaa@theorem@\\@currenvir @numbered\\endcsname\n \\refstepcounter{\\csname aa@theorem@\\@currenvir @counter\\endcsname}%\n \\space\n \\csname the\\csname aa@theorem@\\@currenvir @counter\\endcsname\\endcsname\n \\fi\n \\ifx\\aa@theorem@optionnal\\empty\n \\aa@theorem@aftercount\n \\else\n \\space(\\aa@theorem@optionnal)%\n \\aa@theorem@aftertitle\n \\fi\n \\endgroup\n \\ifdim\\HVSpaceSepTheorem<\\z@\n \\par\\nobreak\n \\vspace{-\\HVSpaceSepTheorem}%\n \\noindent\\hspace*{\\HSpaceIndentTheorem}%\n \\else\n \\hspace*{\\HVSpaceSepTheorem}%\n \\fi\n \\csname aa@theorem@\\@currenvir @bodyfont\\endcsname\n }%\n {%\n \\par\\addvspace{\\VSpaceAfterTheorem}\n }%\n}\n\\newtheorem*{proof}{Proof}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}{\\bfseries}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{exercise}[theorem]{Exercise}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\newtheorem{note}[theorem]{Note}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{problem}[theorem]{Problem}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}{\\bfseries}{\\itshape}\n\\newtheorem{question}[theorem]{Question}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\newtheorem{solution}[theorem]{Solution}{\\itshape}{\\rmfamily}\n\\setlength{\\textfloatsep}{18\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\dbltextfloatsep}{18\\p@ \\@plus 2\\p@ \\@minus 4\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\@fptop}{\\z@}\n\\setlength{\\@fpsep}{12\\p@}\n\\setlength{\\@dblfptop}{\\z@}\n\\setlength{\\@dblfpsep}{12\\p@}\n\\setcounter{topnumber}{4}\n\\renewcommand*\\topfraction{.9}\n\\setcounter{bottomnumber}{2}\n\\renewcommand*\\bottomfraction{.5}\n\\setcounter{totalnumber}{6}\n\\renewcommand*\\textfraction{.05}\n\\renewcommand*\\floatpagefraction{.95}\n\\setcounter{dbltopnumber}{3}\n\\renewcommand*\\dbltopfraction{.9}\n\\renewcommand*\\dblfloatpagefraction{.95}\n\\renewcommand*\\fps@figure{tbp}\n\\renewcommand*\\fps@table{tbp}\n\\def\\sidecaption#1\\caption{%\n \\setbox0=\\hbox{\\ignorespaces#1\\unskip}%\n \\aa@sidecaptionwidth=\\linewidth\n \\advance\\aa@sidecaptionwidth -\\wd0\n \\advance\\aa@sidecaptionwidth -\\aa@figgap\n \\ifdim\\aa@sidecaptionwidth<\\aa@sidecaptionminwidth\n \\ClassWarning{aa}{%\n No sufficient room for the legend;\n using normal \\string\\caption.%\n }%\n \\let\\aa@caption\\@caption\n \\unhbox0\n \\else\n \\let\\aa@caption\\aa@sidecaption\n \\dimen0 \\dp0\n \\advance\\dimen0 \\ht0\n \\dp0 \\dp\\strutbox\n \\advance\\dimen0-\\dp0\n \\ht0 \\dimen0\n \\unhbox0\\hspace{\\aa@figgap}%\n \\fi\n \\refstepcounter\\@captype\n \\@dblarg{\\aa@caption\\@captype}%\n}\n\\long\\def\\aa@sidecaption#1[#2]#3{%\n \\addcontentsline\n {\\csname ext@#1\\endcsname}\n {#1}\n {\\protect\\numberline{\\csname the#1\\endcsname}{\\ignorespaces #2}}%\n \\begingroup\n \\@parboxrestore\n \\aa@makesidecaption{\\csname fnum@#1\\endcsname}{\\ignorespaces #3}%\n \\par\n \\endgroup\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@capstrut{%\n \\leavevmode\n \\vrule \\@width\\z@ \\@height\\ht\\strutbox \\@depth\\z@\n}\n\\def\\aa@@makecaption#1{%\n {\\aa@headcaptionfont #1\\aa@floatcounterend}%\n}\n\\long\\def\\aa@makesidecaption#1#2{%\n \\parbox[b]{\\aa@sidecaptionwidth}{%\n \\aa@captionfont\n \\aa@@makecaption{#1}\n \\aa@capstrut\n #2%\n }%\n}\n\\renewcommand\\@makecaption[2]{%\n \\aa@captionfont\n \\ifx\\@captype\\aa@figtype\n \\par\\vskip\\VSpaceBeforeFigCaption\n \\aa@@makecaption{#1}%\n \\aa@capstrut%\n #2%\n \\par\n \\else\n {\\aa@headcaptionfont #1\\aa@floatcounterend}%\n \\aa@capstrut\n #2%\n \\par\n \\vskip\\VSpaceAfterTabCaption\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand\\tablebib[1]{\\VSpaceBeforeTabFoot=1ex%\n \\par\\vspace{\\VSpaceBeforeTabBib}\n \\noindent\n \\begin{minipage}{\\linewidth}\n {\\aa@tablebibnamefont\\aa@tablebibname.}~%\n \\aa@tablebibfont\n \\ignorespaces\n #1%\n \\end{minipage}%\n}\n\\newcommand\\tablefoot[1]{\\VSpaceBeforeTabBib=1ex%\n \\par\\vspace{\\VSpaceBeforeTabFoot}\n \\noindent\n \\begin{minipage}{\\linewidth}\n {\\aa@tablefootnamefont\\aa@tablefootname.}~%\n \\aa@tablefootfont\n \\ignorespaces\n #1%\n \\end{minipage}%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\tablefootmark[1]{%\n \\unskip\n \\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont\\itshape\\ignorespaces#1}}%\n \\,%\n \\ignorespaces\n}\n\\newcommand\\tablefoottext[2]{%\n \\hbox{\\@textsuperscript{\\normalfont({\\itshape\\ignorespaces#1})}}%\n ~%\n \\ignorespaces\n #2\\ \\ignorespaces%\n}\n% Numbering lines in PDF for all options author's versions\n\\RequirePackage[modulo,mathlines,switch,running,columnwise,pagewise]{linenoaa}\n\\columnwiselinenumbersfalse%\n\\runningpagewiselinenumbers%\n%\n\\setlength\\bibindent{1em}\n\\renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]{%\n \\begingroup\n \\section*{\\refname}%\n \\@mkboth{\\refname}{\\refname}%\n \\aa@bibliographyfont\n \\list{\\@biblabel{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}}%\n {%\n \\settowidth\\labelwidth{\\@biblabel{#1}}%\n \\ifaa@bibnumber\n \\leftmargin\\labelwidth\n \\advance\\leftmargin\\labelsep\n \\else\n \\leftmargin\\bibindent\n \\setlength{\\itemindent}{-\\leftmargin}\n \\fi\n \\@openbib@code\n \\usecounter{enumiv}%\n \\let\\p@enumiv\\@empty\n \\renewcommand\\theenumiv{\\@arabic\\c@enumiv}%\n }%\n \\sloppy\n \\clubpenalty4000\n \\@clubpenalty \\clubpenalty\n \\widowpenalty4000%\n \\sfcode`\\.\\@m\n}{%\n \\endlist\\par\\endgroup%\n \\ifaa@longauth\\nolinenumbers%\n \\ifnum\\aa@nbauthors>10\\relax%\n \\else\n \\kern6pt\\hrule\\kern6pt\\aainstitutename\\aa@longauthfalse\\fi%\n \\fi\n \\ifaa@referee\\if!\\csname appendix\\endcsname!\\relax\\else\\listofobjects\\fi\\fi\n \\def\\@noitemerr{\\ClassWarning{aa}{Empty `thebibliography' environment}}%\n}\n\\def \\@floatboxreset {%\n \\reset@font\n \\ifx\\@captype\\aa@tabtype\n \\small\n \\spacetab\n \\fi\n \\@setnobreak\n \\@setminipage\n}\n\\def\\spacetab{%\n\\abovedisplayshortskip-10pt%\n\\belowdisplayshortskip0pt%\n}\n\\DeclareRobustCommand{\\ion}[2]{\\textup{#1\\,\\textsc{\\lowercase{#2}}}}\n\\newcommand*\\element[1][]{%\n \\def\\aa@element@tr{#1}%\n \\aa@element\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@element[1][]{%\n \\def\\aa@element@tl{#1}%\n \\aa@@element\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@@element[1][]{%\n \\def\\aa@element@bl{#1}%\n \\aa@@@element\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@@@element[2][]{%\n \\def\\aa@element@br{#1}%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\vphantom{x}^{\\aa@element@tl}_{\\aa@element@bl}\n \\mathrm{#2}\n \\vphantom{x}^{\\aa@element@tr}_{\\aa@element@br}\n }%\n}\n\\renewcommand*\\vec[1]{\\ensuremath{\\boldsymbol{#1}}}\n\\newcommand*\\tens[1]{\\ensuremath{\\mathsf{#1}}}\n\\newcommand*\\sq{%\n \\ifmmode\n \\Box\n \\else\n \\begingroup\n \\unskip\\nobreak\n \\hfil\n \\penalty50\n \\hskip1em\n \\null\\nobreak\\hfil$\\Box$%\n \\parfillskip=0pt\n \\finalhyphendemerits=0\n \\endgraf\n \\endgroup\n \\fi\n}\n\\newcommand*\\sun{\\ensuremath{\\odot}}\n\\newcommand*\\degr{\\ensuremath{^\\circ}}\n\\newcommand*\\arcmin{\\ensuremath{^\\prime}}\n\\newcommand*\\arcsec{\\ensuremath{^{\\prime\\prime}}}\n\\def\\utw{\\ensuremath{\\smash{\\rlap{\\lower5pt\\hbox{$\\sim$}}}}}\n\\def\\udtw{\\ensuremath{\\smash{\\rlap{\\lower6pt\\hbox{$\\approx$}}}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fd{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\text{d}}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fh{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\text{h}}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fm{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\text{m}}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fs{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\text{s}}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fdg{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\circ}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\farcm{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\prime}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\farcs{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\prime\\prime}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\fp{\\ensuremath{\\overset{\\scriptscriptstyle\\text{p}}{.}}}\n\\newcommand*\\cor{\\ensuremath{\\mathrel{\\widehat{=}}}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@centerstack[2]{%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\mathrel{%\n \\mathchoice{%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr#1\\cr#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr#1\\cr#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr#1\\cr#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr#1\\cr#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\la{\\aa@centerstack{<}{\\sim}}\n\\newcommand*\\ga{\\aa@centerstack{>}{\\sim}}\n\\newcommand*\\sol{\\aa@centerstack{\\sim}{<}}\n\\newcommand*\\sog{\\aa@centerstack{\\sim}{>}}\n\\newcommand*\\lse{\\aa@centerstack{<}{\\simeq}}\n\\newcommand*\\gse{\\aa@centerstack{>}{\\simeq}}\n\\newcommand*\\aa@centerstackskip[6]{%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\mathrel{%\n \\mathchoice{%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\displaystyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n #1\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip#3}#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\textstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n #1\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip#4}#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n #1\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip#5}#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\vcenter{%\n \\offinterlineskip\n \\halign{\\hfil$\\scriptscriptstyle##$\\hfil\\cr\n #1\\cr\\noalign{\\vskip#6}#2\\cr}%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\grole{\\aa@centerstackskip{>}{<}{-1.5\\p@}{-1.5\\p@}{-1\\p@}{-.5\\p@}}\n\\newcommand*\\leogr{\\aa@centerstackskip{<}{>}{-1.5\\p@}{-1.5\\p@}{-1\\p@}{-.5\\p@}}\n\\newcommand*\\loa{\\aa@centerstack{<}{\\approx}}\n\\newcommand*\\goa{\\aa@centerstack{>}{\\approx}}\n\\newcommand*\\diameter{%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\mathchoice{%\n \\ooalign{%\n \\hfil\\hbox{$\\displaystyle/$}\\hfil\\crcr\n {\\hbox{$\\displaystyle\\mathchar\"20D$}}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\ooalign{%\n \\hfil\\hbox{$\\textstyle/$}\\hfil\\crcr\n {\\hbox{$\\textstyle\\mathchar\"20D$}}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\ooalign{%\n \\hfil\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle/$}\\hfil\\crcr\n {\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle\\mathchar\"20D$}}%\n }%\n }\n {%\n \\ooalign{%\n \\hfil\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle/$}\\hfil\\crcr\n {\\hbox{$\\scriptscriptstyle\\mathchar\"20D$}}%\n }%\n }%\n }%\n}\n\\let\\olddiameter\\diameter\n\\newcommand*\\getsto{\\aa@centerstack{\\gets}{\\to}}\n\\newcommand*\\lid{\\aa@centerstackskip{<}{=}{1.2\\p@}{1.2\\p@}{1\\p@}{0.9\\p@}}\n\\newcommand*\\gid{\\aa@centerstackskip{>}{=}{1.2\\p@}{1.2\\p@}{1\\p@}{0.9\\p@}}\n\\newcommand*\\bbbone{%\n \\ensuremath{%\n \\mathchoice{\\mathrm 1\\mskip-4mu l}\n {\\mathrm 1\\mskip-4mu l}\n {\\mathrm 1\\mskip-4.5mu l}\n {\\mathrm 1\\mskip-5mu l}%\n }%\n}\n\\newcommand*\\aap{A\\&A}\n\\let\\astap=\\aap\n\\newcommand*\\aapr{A\\&A~Rev.}\n\\newcommand*\\aaps{A\\&AS}\n\\newcommand*\\actaa{Acta Astron.}\n\\newcommand*\\aj{AJ}\n\\newcommand*\\ao{Appl.~Opt.}\n\\let\\applopt\\ao\n\\newcommand*\\apj{ApJ}\n\\newcommand*\\apjl{ApJ}\n\\let\\apjlett\\apjl\n\\newcommand*\\apjs{ApJS}\n\\let\\apjsupp\\apjs\n\\newcommand*\\aplett{Astrophys.~Lett.}\n\\newcommand*\\apspr{Astrophys.~Space~Phys.~Res.}\n\\newcommand*\\apss{Ap\\&SS}\n\\newcommand*\\araa{ARA\\&A}\n\\newcommand*\\azh{AZh}\n\\newcommand*\\baas{BAAS}\n\\newcommand*\\bac{Bull. astr. Inst. Czechosl.}\n\\newcommand*\\bain{Bull.~Astron.~Inst.~Netherlands}\n\\newcommand*\\caa{Chinese Astron. Astrophys.}\n\\newcommand*\\cjaa{Chinese J. Astron. Astrophys.}\n\\newcommand*\\fcp{Fund.~Cosmic~Phys.}\n\\newcommand*\\gca{Geochim.~Cosmochim.~Acta}\n\\newcommand*\\grl{Geophys.~Res.~Lett.}\n\\newcommand*\\iaucirc{IAU~Circ.}\n\\newcommand*\\icarus{Icarus}\n\\newcommand*\\jcap{J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.}\n\\newcommand*\\jcp{J.~Chem.~Phys.}\n\\newcommand*\\jgr{J.~Geophys.~Res.}\n\\newcommand*\\jqsrt{J.~Quant.~Spectr.~Rad.~Transf.}\n\\newcommand*\\jrasc{JRASC}\n\\newcommand*\\memras{MmRAS}\n\\newcommand*\\memsai{Mem.~Soc.~Astron.~Italiana}\n\\newcommand*\\mnras{MNRAS}\n\\newcommand*\\na{New A}\n\\newcommand*\\nar{New A Rev.}\n\\newcommand*\\nat{Nature}\n\\newcommand*\\nphysa{Nucl.~Phys.~A}\n\\newcommand*\\pasa{PASA}\n\\newcommand*\\pasj{PASJ}\n\\newcommand*\\pasp{PASP}\n\\newcommand*\\physrep{Phys.~Rep.}\n\\newcommand*\\physscr{Phys.~Scr}\n\\newcommand*\\planss{Planet.~Space~Sci.}\n\\newcommand*\\pra{Phys.~Rev.~A}\n\\newcommand*\\prb{Phys.~Rev.~B}\n\\newcommand*\\prc{Phys.~Rev.~C}\n\\newcommand*\\prd{Phys.~Rev.~D}\n\\newcommand*\\pre{Phys.~Rev.~E}\n\\newcommand*\\prl{Phys.~Rev.~Lett.}\n\\newcommand*\\procspie{Proc.~SPIE}\n\\newcommand*\\qjras{QJRAS}\n\\newcommand*\\rmxaa{Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis.}\n\\newcommand*\\skytel{S\\&T}\n\\newcommand*\\solphys{Sol.~Phys.}\n\\newcommand*\\sovast{Soviet~Ast.}\n\\newcommand*\\ssr{Space~Sci.~Rev.}\n\\newcommand*\\zap{ZAp}\n\\DeclareMathAlphabet{\\mathsfsl}{OT1}{txss}{m}{sl}\n\\g@addto@macro{\\endlongtable}{\\addvspace{-3.5mm}}\n\\AtBeginDocument{%\n\\@ifpackageloaded{lscape}{%\n\\g@addto@macro{\\landscape}{\\centering\\setlength{\\LTcapwidth}{\\aa@fullheight}}}{}\n\\@ifpackageloaded{pdflscape}{%\n\\g@addto@macro{\\landscape}{\\centering\\setlength{\\LTcapwidth}{\\aa@fullheight}}}{}\n\\@ifpackageloaded{aalongtable}%\n{\\def\\LS@rot{%\n \\setbox\\@outputbox\\vbox\n to\\aa@fullheight{\\vfill\\centerline{\\rotatebox{90}{\\box\\@outputbox}}\\vfill}}}{}\n\\@ifpackageloaded{subfigure}%\n{\\renewcommand*{\\thesubfigure}{\\alph{subfigure}}\n\\renewcommand*{\\@thesubfigure}{(\\thesubfigure)\\hskip\\subfiglabelskip}\n\\renewcommand*{\\@@thesubfigure}{(\\thesubfigure)}%\n\\renewcommand*{\\thesubtable}{\\alph{subtable}}\n\\renewcommand*{\\@thesubtable}{(\\thesubtable)\\hskip\\subfiglabelskip}\n\\renewcommand*{\\@@thesubtable}{(\\thesubtable)}}{}\n\\@ifpackageloaded{wasysym}%\n{\\let\\diameter\\olddiameter}{}\n\\@ifpackageloaded{txfonts}%\n{%\n \\newcommand*\\bbba{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{A}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbb{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{B}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbc{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{C}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbd{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{D}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbe{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{E}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbf{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{F}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbg{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{G}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbh{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{H}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbi{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{I}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbj{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{J}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbk{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{K}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbl{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{L}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbm{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{M}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbn{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{N}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbo{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{O}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbp{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{P}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbq{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{Q}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbr{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{R}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbs{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{S}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbt{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{T}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbu{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{U}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbv{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{V}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbw{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{W}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbx{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{X}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbby{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{Y}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbz{\\ensuremath{\\varmathbb{Z}}}}%\n{%\n \\newcommand*\\bbba{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{A}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbb{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{B}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbc{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{C}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbd{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{D}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbe{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{E}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbf{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{F}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbg{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{G}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbh{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{H}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbi{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{I}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbj{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{J}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbk{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{K}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbl{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{L}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbm{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{M}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbn{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{N}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbo{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{O}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbp{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{P}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbq{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{Q}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbr{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{R}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbs{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{S}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbt{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{T}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbu{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{U}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbv{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{V}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbw{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{W}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbx{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{X}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbby{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{Y}}}\n \\newcommand*\\bbbz{\\ensuremath{\\mathbf{Z}}}}\n}\n\\setlength\\leftmargini {\\parindent}\n\\leftmargin \\leftmargini\n\\setlength\\leftmarginii {\\parindent}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiii {1.87em}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginiv {1.7em}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginv {.5em}\n\\setlength\\leftmarginvi {.5em}\n\\setlength \\labelsep {.5em}\n\\setlength \\labelwidth{\\leftmargini}\n\\addtolength\\labelwidth{-\\labelsep}\n\\renewcommand\\theenumi{\\@arabic\\c@enumi}\n\\renewcommand\\theenumii{\\@alph\\c@enumii}\n\\renewcommand\\theenumiii{\\@roman\\c@enumiii}\n\\renewcommand\\theenumiv{\\@Alph\\c@enumiv}\n\\renewcommand\\labelenumi{\\theenumi.}\n\\renewcommand\\labelenumii{(\\theenumii)}\n\\renewcommand\\labelenumiii{\\theenumiii.}\n\\renewcommand\\labelenumiv{\\theenumiv.}\n\\renewcommand\\p@enumii{\\theenumi}\n\\renewcommand\\p@enumiii{\\theenumi(\\theenumii)}\n\\renewcommand\\p@enumiv{\\p@enumiii\\theenumiii}\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemi{\\normalfont\\bfseries --}\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemii{\\normalfont\\bfseries --}\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemiii{$\\m@th\\bullet$}\n\\renewcommand\\labelitemiv{$\\m@th\\cdot$}\n\\def\\arxivprefixe{arXiv}\n\\def\\arxivprefixesep{:}\n\\def\\arxiv#1{%\n{\\tt \\arxivprefixe\\arxivprefixesep\\ignorespaces#1}%\n}\n\\newcommand{\\eprint}[2][]{%\n{\\tt\\if!#1!#2\\else#1\\arxivprefixesep\\ignorespaces#2\\fi}%\n}\n% \\corr : Mute tag used by LE\n\\newcommand{\\corr}[1]{#1}\n%\n% Package required for complexed name figure files\n\\RequirePackage{grffile}\n%\n\\AtBeginDocument{\\renewcommand*\\aa@pageof{, page \\thepage{}}}\n%\n\\endinput\n%%\n%% End of file `aa.cls'.\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: lineno.sty\n================================================\n \\iffalse; awk '/S[H]ELL1/' lineno.sty|sh;exit; \n ... see bottom for .tex documentation ... \n\nMacro file lineno.sty for LaTeX: attach line numbers, refer to them. \n \\fi \n\\def\\fileversion{v4.41} \\def\\filedate{2005/11/02} %VERSION\n\n%%% Copyright 1995--2003 Stephan I. B\"ottcher <boettcher@physik.uni-kiel.de>; \n%%% Copyright 2002--2005 Uwe L\"uck, http://www.contact-ednotes.sty.de.vu \n%%% for version 4 and code from former Ednotes bundle \n%%% --author-maintained. \n%%% \n%%% This file can be redistributed and/or modified under \n%%% the terms of the LaTeX Project Public License; either \n%%% version 1.3a of the License, or any later version.\n%%% The latest version of this license is in\n%%% http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt\n%%% We did our best to help you, but there is NO WARRANTY. \n% \n%%% $Id: lineno.sty,v 3.14.2.2 2004/09/13 19:30:39 stephan Exp $ %% was v4.00.\n% \\title{\\texttt{\\itshape \n%% %% (UL 2004/10/09:) Italic TT is evil\n%% %% ... or nice front page layout!? \n%%\n% lineno.sty \\ \\fileversion\\ \\filedate \n% \\unskip}\\\\\\ \\\\\n% A \\LaTeX\\ package to attach \n% \\\\ line numbers to paragraphs\n% \\unskip}\\author{% \n% Stephan I. B\\\"ottcher \n% \\\\ Uwe L\\\"uck \n% \\unskip}\\date{% \n% boettcher@physik.uni-kiel.de \n% \\\\ http://contact-ednotes.sty.de.vu \n%% \\\\ stephan@nevis.columbia.edu\n%% \\\\ Stephan.Boettcher@cern.ch \n% \\\\}\n%\n% \\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}%D\n% \\usepackage{lineno}%D \n%% %% (New v4.00)\n% \\catcode`\\_\\active\\let_~ \n%% %% Beware math!? (/New v4.00) \n% \\def~{\\verb~} \n% \\let\\lessthan< \n% \\catcode`\\<\\active\n% \\def<#1>{$\\langle${\\itshape#1}\\/$\\rangle$}\n% \\catcode`\\|\\active\n%% (New v4.1: \\tt star; in box anyway.) \n% \\def|#1{\\ttfamily\\string#1}\n%% \\def|#1{{\\ttfamily\\string#1}}\n%% (/New v4.1) \n% \\newenvironment{code}\n% {\\par\\runninglinenumbers\n% \\modulolinenumbers[1]%\n% \\linenumbersep.3em\n% \\footnotesize\n% \\def\\linenumberfont\n% {\\normalfont\\tiny\\itshape}}\n% {} \n%% %% (New v4.00)\n% {\\makeatletter \\gdef\\scs#1{\\texttt\n% {\\protect\\@backslashchar#1}}}\n% \\def\\old{\\par\\footnotesize}\n%% %% (/New v4.00)\n%% %% (New v4.1) \n% {\\catcode`\\/\\active\n% \\gdef\\path{\\begingroup\\catcode`\\/\\active\n% \\let/\\slash\\dopath}\n% \\gdef\\dopath#1{\\slash\\unpenalty#1\\endgroup}}\n%% %% (/New v4.1)\n%\n% \\begin{document}%D\n%% \\DocInput{lineno}%D\n% \\pagewiselinenumbers\n% \\maketitle \n% \\pagestyle{headings}\n% \\tableofcontents\n% \\sloppy\n% \n%% %% New v4.00: `...section{%' + \\unskip \n% \\section{%\n% Introductions \n%% %% New v4.00: `s'\n% \\unskip}\n% \n% (New v4.00) Parts of former first section \n% have been rendered separate subsections for package \n% version_v4.00. (/New v4.00) \n% \n% \\subsection{% \n% Introduction to versions $\\textrm{v}\\lessthan4$\n% \\unskip} \n% \n% This package provides line numbers on paragraphs.\n% After \\TeX\\ has broken a paragraph into lines there will\n% be line numbers attached to them, with the possibility to\n% make references through the \\LaTeX\\ ~\\ref~, ~\\pageref~\n% cross reference mechanism. This includes four issues:\n% \\begin{itemize}\n% \\item attach a line number on each line,\n% \\item create references to a line number,\n% \\item control line numbering mode,\n% \\item count the lines and print the numbers.\n% \\end{itemize}\n% The first two points are implemented through patches to\n% the output routine. The third by redefining ~\\par~, ~\\@par~\n% and ~\\@@par~. The counting is easy, as long as you want\n% the line numbers run through the text. If they shall\n% start over at the top of each page, the aux-file as well\n% as \\TeX s memory have to carry a load for each counted line.\n%\n% I wrote this package for my wife Petra, who needs it for\n% transcriptions of interviews. This allows her to\n% precisely refer to passages in the text. It works well\n% together with ~\\marginpar~s, but not too well with displaymath.\n% ~\\footnote~s are a problem, especially when they\n% are split, but we may get there. \n% (New v4.00 UL) Version v4.00 overcomes the problem, I believe. \n% (/UL /New v4.00)\n%\n% lineno.sty works\n% surprisingly well with other packages, for\n% example, ~wrapfig.sty~. So please try if it\n% works with whatever you need, and if it does,\n% please tell me, and if it does not, tell me as\n% well, so I can try to fix it.\n%\n% \\subsection{%\n% Introduction to versions v4.00ff. (UL) \n% \\unskip}\n% \n% ~lineno.sty~ has been maintained by Stephan until version_v3.14.\n% From version_v4.00 onwards, maintenance is shifting towards \n% Uwe L\\\"uck (UL), who is the author of v4\\dots code and of v4\\dots \n% changes in documentation. This came about as follows. \n% \n% Since late 2002, Christian Tapp and Uwe L\\\"uck have employed \n% ~lineno.sty~ for their ~ednotes.sty~, a package supporting \n% critical editions---cf.\n% \\[\\mbox{\\tt \n% http://ednotes.sty.de.vu \n% \\unskip}\\]\n% ---while you find ~ednotes.sty~ and surrounding files in \n% CTAN folder \\path{macros/latex/contrib/ednotes}.\n% \n% Soon, some weaknesses of ~lineno.sty~ showed up, mainly since \n% Christian's critical editions (using ~ednotes.sty~) needed lots \n% of ~\\linelabel~s and footnotes. (These weaknesses are due to \n% weaknesses of \\LaTeX's ~\\marginpar~ mechanism that Stephan \n% used for ~\\linelabel~.) So we changed some ~lineno.sty~ \n% definitions in some extra files, which moreover offered new \n% features. We sent these files to Stephan, hoping he would take \n% the changes into ~lineno.sty~. However, he was too short of time. \n% \n% Writing a TUGboat article on Ednotes in 2004, we hoped to \n% reduce the number of files in the Ednotes bundle and so asked \n% Stephan again. Now he generously offered maintenance to me, so \n% I could execute the changes on my own. \n% \n% The improvements are as follows: \n% \\begin{itemize}\\item \n% [(i)] Footnotes placement approaches intentions better \n% (footnotes formerly liked to pile up at late pages). \n% \\item \n% [(ii)] The number of ~\\linelabel~s in one paragraph is no longer \n% limited to 18. \n% \\item \n% [(iii)] ~\\pagebreak~, ~\\nopagebreak~, ~\\vspace~, and the star \n% and optional versions of ~\\\\~ work as one would expect \n% (section_\\ref{s:MVadj}). %% Added for v4.1\n% \\item \n% [(iv)] A command is offered which chooses the first line number \n% to be printed in the margin \n% (subsection_\\ref{ss:Mod}). %% Added for v4.1\n% \\item \n% [(v)] (New v4.1) \\LaTeX\\ tabular environments (optionally) \n% get line numbers as well, and you can refer to them in the \n% usual automatic way. (It may be considered a shortcoming that, \n% precisely, \\emph{rows} are numbered, not lines.---See \n% subsection_\\ref{ss:Tab}.) \n% \\item \n% [(vi)] We are moving towards referring to math items \n% (subsection_\\ref{ss:MathRef} and the hooks in \n% subsection_\\ref{ss:LL}). \n% (/New v4.1) \n% \\end{itemize}\n% (Thanks to Stephan for making this possible!)\n% \n%% Unpublish: \n%% You may trace the earlier developments of these changes by \n%% requesting our files ~linenox0.sty~, ~linenox1.sty~, and \n%% ~lnopatch.sty~. Most of our changes have been in ~linenox0.sty~. \n%% Our ~linenox1.sty~ has extended ~linenox0.sty~ for one single \n%% purpose in a not very stable way. \n%%% (See ~\\linenumberpar~ below). \n%% ~lnopatch.sty~ has done the first line number thing referred \n%% to in case_(iv) up to now. \n%% (New v4.1) \n%% Case_(v) earlier was provided by our ~edtab02.sty~---now \n%% called ~edtable.sty~. \n%% (/New v4.1) \n% \n% Ednotes moreover profits from Stephan's offer with regard \n% to the documentation of our code which yielded these \n% improvements formerly. This documentation now becomes \n% printable, being part of the ~lineno.sty~ documentation. \n% \n% Of course, Stephan's previous ~lineno.sty~ versions were a great \n% and ingenious work and exhibit greatest \\TeX pertise. I never \n% could have done this. I learnt a lot in studying the code when \n% Christian pointed out strange output results and error \n% messages, and there are still large portions of ~lineno.sty~ \n% which I don't understand (consider only pagewise numbering of \n% lines). Fortunately, Stephan has offered future help if \n% needed.---My code for attaching line numbers to \\emph{tabular \n% environments} (as mentioned above, now still in \n% ~edtable.sty~) %% %% TODO\n% developed from macros which Stephan and Christian experimented \n% with in December 2002. Stephan built the basics. \n% (However, I then became too proud to follow his advice only to \n% use and modify ~longtable.sty~.)\n% \n% There are some issues concerning use of counters on which I \n% don't agree with Stephan and where I would like to change the \n% code if ~lineno.sty~ is ``mine'' as Stephan offered. However, \n% Stephan is afraid of compatibility problems from which, in \n% particular, his wife could suffer in the near future. So he \n% demanded that I change as little as possible for my first \n% version. Instead of executing changes that I plan I just offer \n% my opinions at the single occasions. I hope to get in touch \n% this way with users who consider subtle features vital which I \n% consider strange. \n% \n% On the other hand, the sections on improvements of the \n% implementation have been blown up very much and may be tiring \n% and litte understandable for mere \\emph{users}. These users \n% may profit from the present presentation just by jumping to \n% sections_\\ref{s:Opts} and_\\ref{s:UserCmds}. There is a user's \n% guide ulineno.tex which may be even more helpful, but it has \n% not been updated for a while. %% TODO\n% \n% \\subsection{%\n% Availability \n% \\unskip}\n% \n% In case you have found the present file otherwise than from \n% CTAN: A recent version and documentation of this package \n% should be available from CTAN folder \n% \\path{macros/latex/contrib/lineno}.\n% Or mail to one of the addresses at top of file. \n% \n% \\subsection{% \n% Introductory code\n% \\unskip}\n% \n% This style option is written for \\LaTeXe, November 1994 or later,\n% since we need the ~\\protected@write~ macro. \n% \n% (New v4.00) And we use ~\\newcommand*~ for \n% controlling length of user macro arguments, which has been \n% available since December 1994. \n%% \n\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1994/12/01] \n%% [1994/11/04] \n\\ProvidesPackage{lineno} \n [\\filedate\\space line numbers on paragraphs \\fileversion] \n% (/New v4.00) \n%% \n%% History of versions: \n%% v1.00 1995/03/31 SIB: first release for Petra's interview transcriptions\n%% v1.01 1995/10/28 SIB: added ~pagewise~ mode\n%% v1.02 1995/11/15 SIB: added ~modulo~ option \n%% v1.03 1995/12/05 SIB: pagewise: try to reduce the hash-size requirements\n%% v2.00 1995/12/06 SIB: .. it works, new user interface\n%% v2.01 1996/09/17 SIB: put into CVS\n%% v2.02 1997/03/17 SIB: add: \\@reinserts, for footnotes\n%% v2.04 1998/03/09 SIB: add: linenomath environment\n%% v2.05 1998/04/26 SIB: add: prevgraf test\n%% v2.06 1999/03/02 SIB: LPPL added\n%% v3.00 1999/06/11 SiB: include the extension in the main file\n%% v3.01 1999/08/28 SiB: \\@reinserts -> \\holdinginserts\n%% v3.02 2000/03/10 SiB: \\@LN@output\n%% v3.03 2000/07/01 SiB: \\@LN@ExtraLabelItems, hyperref\n%% v3.04 2000/12/17 SiB: longtable compatibility.\n%% v3.05 2001/01/02 SiB: [fleqn] detection. \n%% v3.05a 2001/01/04 SiB: [fleqn] detection reverted for eqnarray. \n%% v3.06 2001/01/17 SiB: [twocolumn] mode support.\n%% v3.07 2001/07/30 SiB: [hyperref] option obsoleted.\n%% v3.08 2001/08/02 SiB: linenomath wrapping for \\[ \\]\n%% v3.08a 2001/08/04 SiB: linenomath wrapping for \\[ \\] fixed\n%% v3.08b 2002/01/27 SiB: enquotation typo fix\n%% v3.09 2003/01/14 SIB: hyperref detection fix\n%% v3.10 2003/04/15 FMi: \\MakeLineNo fix for deep boxes\n%% v3.10a 2003/11/12 Uwe Lück: \\lineref typo fix\n%% v4.00 2004/09/02 UL: included linenox0, linenox1, lnopatch code with \n%% documentation, usually indicated by `New v4.00'; \n%% discussions of old code, indicated by `UL'; \n%% LPPL v.1 -> LPPL v1.3, `program' -> `file'; \n%% first lines with \\filedate and \\fileversion, \n%% according nawk lines; `November 1994 or later', \n%% some earlier documentation typos (including a few \n%% bad minus signs), { -> {% and } -> \\unskip} at \n%% line ends (so, e.g., alignment in TOC works); \\scs. \n%% 2004/09/03 UL: removed everything which indicated that the \n%% present file were named `lineno4.sty'. \n%% v4.1 2004/09/19 UL: Inserted Stephan's identification line, removed \n%% some TODOs and remarks from v4.00. \n%% 2004/10/04 UL: Added acknowledgement for Daniel Doherty; \n%% `(New v4.00)' with [|\\firstlinenumber]; changed \n%% TODOs; Refining -> Redefining (\\vadjust). \n%% 2004/10/05 UL: ednmath0 -> mathrefs; \\catcode`\\~ -> \\active;\n%% \\path; refined section on options `mathrefs'; \n%% changes in introduction. \n%% 2004/10/06 UL: Changed/removed TODOs, e.g., for edtable.sty. \n%% 2004/10/11 UL: Reminders: linenox0/1/lnopatch.sty obsolete; \n%% \\tt star in list of commands.\n%% 2004/10/12 UL: Corrected blank lines in lineno.tex. \n%% 2004/10/19 UL: Fixed minor typos; remark on \\if@LN@edtable. \n%% v4.1a 2004/11/07 UL: LPPL v1.3a. \n%% v4.1b 2004/11/13 UL: Comment on \\outputpenalty values. \n%% v4.1c 2005/01/10 UL: Contact via http. \n%% v4.11 2005/02/20 UL: Error message with \\linelabel when not numbering. \n%% 2005/03/07 UL: Removed \\linelabel from ss:Tab heading, consider \n%% marginal line numbers as well, revised ss:Tab. \n%% Added a few lines on missing explanations to \n%% s:UserCmds. Corrected some code alignments. \n%% 2005/03/08 UL: Require recent edtable.sty. \n%%\n\n%% v4.2 2005/03/21 UL: \"Physical page\" counter works with \\include. \n%% 2005/04/17 UL: Raised options section above extensions section \n%% (v4.00 disabled `displaymath' option); \n%% third arg for \\@ifundefined{mathindent}; \n%% \"bunch of options\"; \n%% 2005/04/24 UL: compatibility with tamefloats; vplref.sty. \n%% 2005/04/25 UL: \\number -> \\the; wondered -> $$; subsec. appbas; \n%% CrtlLN sec -> subsec.; \\newcommand* wherever ...; \n%% doc. on `other output routines' and `addpageno' \n%% (this changed from `varioref'). \n%% 2005/04/27 UL: =1\\relax -> =\\@ne, 0\\relax ..., \\hb@xt@, \n%% \\ifx\\@@par\\@@@par -> \\ifLineNumbers, typos, \n%% \\pagestyle{headings}, LaTeX -> \\LaTeX. \n%% v4.21 2005/04/28 UL: linenomath section: removed wrong \\else's, \n%% \\holding...: \\thr@@, \\@LN@outer@holdins, \\global. \n%% v4.22 2005/05/01 UL: \\unvbox\\@outputbox; \\@LN@col without #1, \n%% 2005/05/08 UL: global/local \\internall..., \\resetl... global, \n%% shortened discussions of this and of \\newcounter. \n%% 2005/05/09 UL: corr.: doc. typo, version history, bad lines; \n%% percent; \\chardef for modulo, \n%% \\value{firstlinenumber}. \n%% v4.3 2005/05/10 UL: \\@backslashchar -> \\char`\\\\ in \\scs. \n%% 2005/05/11 UL: \\linenumbers sets ...outer@holdins; tidied up \n%% documentation regarding earlier versions. \n%% 2005/05/12 UL: `linenomath' without spurious number above; \n%% `displaymath' default; edmac homepage -> \n%% ednotes.sty.de.vu, \\endlinenomath without \n%% numbers: no change of \\holdinginserts; \n%% \\linelabel doesn't go to .aux or mark, \n%% hyperref detected; undone 2005/05/10 (bad mark). \n%% 2005/05/13 UL: Reworked hyperref detection (new subsec.). \n%% 2005/05/15 UL: More typo fixes, corrected terrible confusions in \n%% the discussion (v4.22/v4.3) of \\new/\\stepcounter; \n%% new subsec. in `Line number ...'; another \n%% implementation of `hyperref' detection. \n%% 2005/05/16 UL: Final minor changes. \n%% v4.31b /06/14 UL: Extended explanation of \\firstlinenumbers \n%% and package options; \\@LN@ifgreat@critical; \n%% \\modulolinenumbers*. Sent to Ednotes.news only.\n%% v4.31 2005/06/15 UL: \\modulolinenumbers* with \\firstlinenumber{1}; \n%% \" -> ``/''; more doc. on \\firstlinenumber .\n%% 2005/06/20 UL: Typo fix. \n%% 2005/10/01 UL: Warning about \\mod...* with pagewise mode. \n%% v4.31a /10/02 UL: Minor changes of appearance of doc., e.g., \n%% \\[ for $$. \n%% v4.32b /10/15 UL: Support for \\addvspace; removed comments that\n%% had been invisible already for some time; \n%% made clear with which environments the \n%% linenomath environment is not needed. \n%% v4.32ab /10/15 UL: Observe \\if@nobreak with support for \\addvspace. \n%% v4.32 2005/10/17 UL: Just made it official and sent it to CTAN. \n%% v4.33b /10/23 UL: \\if@nobreak\\nobreak\\fi -> \\nobreak . \n%% v4.33ab /10/24 UL: \\LineNoLaTeXOutput without \\@tempswafalse; \n%% undid v4.22: \\[unv]box\\@outputbox (space is OK, \n%% \\unvbox pushes short columns down); \\@LN@kern@z@ . \n%% v4.4b 2005/10/24 UL: Another tidying-up of the discussion of \n%% \\stepcounter{linenumber}; \\@LN@screenoff@pen \n%% replaces \\@LN@kern@z@, \\@LN@depthbox . \n%% v4.4 2005/10/27 UL: Just made official for CTAN. \n%% v4.4a 2005/10/29 UL: Undid change of discussion of \n%% \\stepcounter{linenumber} (confusion again). \n%% v4.41 2005/11/02 UL: Raised \\CheckCommand*. \n%% \n%% Acknowledgements:\n%% v3.06: Donald Arseneau, pointed to mparhack.sty.\n%% v3.07+: Frank Mittelbach, points out inconsistencies in the\n%% user interface.\n%% v3.10: Frank Mittelbach \\MakeLineNo fix for deep boxes\n%% v4.00: Daniel Doherty points out clash of \\pagewise... with resetting \n%% page number. \n%% v4.21: Much testing work by Erik Luijten. \n%% v4.3: `displaymath' default by Erik Luijten's suggestion. \n%% v4.31: \\modulolinenumbers* is an idea of Hillel Chayim Yisraeli's. \n%% v4.32: Support for \\addvspace due to Saravanan M.'s observation. \n%% v4.33: Different support for \\addvspace due to bug reports by \n%% Saravanan M.'s and David Josef Dev. \n%% v4.4: David Josef Dev points out that \\kern\\z@ after a paragraph \n%% tends to place its final baseline wrongly. \n%\n%\n% \\section{%\n% Put the line numbers to the lines\n% \\unskip}\n% \n% (New v4.00) This section contained the most \n% basic package code previously. For various purposes of \n% version_4\\dots, much of these basics have been to be modified. \n% Much of my (UL's) reasoning on these modifications has been to \n% be reported. Sorry, the present section has been blown up \n% awfully thus and contains ramifications that may be difficult \n% to trace. We add some ~\\subsection~ commands in order to cope \n% with the new situation. (/New v4.00) \n% \n% \\subsection{% \n% Basic code of \\texttt{lineno.sty} \\scs{output}\n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:output} \n% \n% The line numbers have to be attached by the output\n% routine. We simply set the ~\\interlinepenalty~ to $-100000$.\n% The output routine will be called after each line in the\n% paragraph, except the last, where we trigger by ~\\par~.\n% The ~\\linenopenalty~ is small enough to compensate a bunch of\n% penalties (e.g., with ~\\samepage~).\n%\n% (New v3.04) Longtable uses \n% ~\\penalty~$-30000$. The lineno penalty range was \n% shrunk to $-188000 \\dots -32000$. (/New v3.04)\n% (New v4.00) New values are listed below (11111f.). (/New v4.00) \n\n\\newcount\\linenopenalty\\linenopenalty=-100000\n\n%% TODO v4.4+: \n% (UL) Hm. It is never needed below \n% that this is a counter. ~\\def\\linenopenalty{-100000\\relax}~ \n% would do. (I guess this consumes more memory, but it \n% is more important to save counters than to save memory.) \n% I was frightened by ~-\\linenopenalty~ below, but indeed \n% \\TeX\\ interprets the string ~--100000~ as 100000. \n% Has any user or extension package writer ever called \n% ~\\linenopenalty=xxx~, or could I really change this?---The \n% counter is somewhat faster than the macro. Together with the \n% compatibility question this seems to support keeping the \n% counter. (???) \n%% Note that Stephan chose ~\\mathchardef~ below, \n%% so his choice above seems to have been deliberate. \n%% <- no point, \\mathchardef token is fast. \n% (/UL) \n\n\\mathchardef\\linenopenaltypar=32000\n\n% So let's make a hook to ~\\output~, the direct way. The \\LaTeX\\ \n% macro ~\\@reinserts~ puts the footnotes back on the page.\n%\n% (New v3.01) ~\\@reinserts~ badly\n% screws up split footnotes. The bottom part is\n% still on the recent contributions list, and the\n% top part will be put back there after the bottom\n% part. Thus, since lineno.sty does not play well\n% with ~\\inserts~ anyway, we can safely experiment\n% with ~\\holdinginserts~, without making things\n% much worse. \n%\n% Or that's what I thought, but: Just activating\n% ~\\holdinginserts~ while doing the ~\\par~ will\n% not do the trick: The ~\\output~ routine may be\n% called for a real page break before all line\n% numbers are done, and how can we get control\n% over ~\\holdinginserts~ at that point?\n%\n% Let's try this: When the ~\\output~ routine is\n% run with ~\\holdinginserts=3~ for a real page\n% break, then we reset ~\\holdinginserts~ and\n% restart ~\\output~.\n%\n% Then, again, how do we keep the remaining\n% ~\\inserts~ while doing further line numbers? \n%\n% If we find ~\\holdinginserts~=$-3$ we activate it again \n% after doing ~\\output~. (/New v3.01)\n%\n% (New v3.02) To work with\n% multicol.sty, the original output routine is now\n% called indirectly, instead of being replaced.\n% When multicol.sty changes ~\\output~, it is a\n% toks register, not the real thing. (/New v3.02)\n% \n% (New v4.00) Two further complications are added. \n%%\n%% TODO v4.3+: Or three, ~\\@nobreakfalse~ after ~\\MakeLineNo~ \n%% for getting rid of ~\\@LN@nopagebreak~. \n% \\begin{itemize}\\item\n% [(i)] Problems with footnotes formerly resulted from \n% \\LaTeX's ~\\@reinserts~ in ~\\@specialoutput~ which Stephan's \n% ~\\linelabel~ called via the ~\\marginpar~ mechanism. \n% \\item\n% [(ii)] \\LaTeX\\ commands using ~\\vadjust~ formerly didn't work \n% as one would have hoped. The problem is as follows: \n% Printing the line number results from \n% a box that the output routine inserts at the place of the \n% ~\\interlinepenalty~. ~\\vadjust~ items appear \\emph{above} the \n% ~\\interlinepenalty~ (\\TeX book p._105). So ~\\pagebreak~, e.g., \n% formerly sent the line number to the next page, while the \n% penalty from ~\\nopagebreak~ could not tie the following line, \n% since it was screened off by the line number box.---Our trick \n% is putting the ~\\vadjust~ items into a list macro from which \n% the output routine transfers them into the vertical list, \n% below the line number box. \n% \\end{itemize}\n% In this case_(ii), like in case_(i), footnotes would suffer \n% if ~\\holdinginserts~ were non-positive. Indeed, in both \n% cases_(i) and_(ii) we tackle the footnote problem by extending \n% that part of Stephan's output routine that is active when \n% ~\\holdinginserts~ is positive. This extension writes the line \n% number ~\\newlabel~ to the .aux file (which was formerly done \n% under $~\\holdinginserts~=-3$) and handles the ~\\vadjust~ \n% items.---To trigger ~\\output~ and its ~\\linelabel~ or, resp., \n% ~\\vadjust~ part, the list of signal penalties started \n% immediately before is increased here (first for ~\\linelabel~, \n% second for postponed ~\\vadjust~ items): \n\n\\mathchardef\\@Mllbcodepen=11111 \n\\mathchardef\\@Mppvacodepen=11112 \n\n% (/New v4.00) (New v4.2) David Kastrup urges to use a private \n% name instead of ~\\the\\output~ (LaTeX-L-list). Otherwise an \n% ~\\output~ routine loaded later and using ~\\newtoks\\output~ \n% again may get lost entirely. So we change use of ~\\@LN@output~, \n% using it for the former purpose. Reference to what appeared \n% with the name of ~\\output~ here lasts for a few lines and then \n% is given away. \n\n\\let\\@tempa\\output\n\\newtoks\\output\n\\let\\@LN@output\\output\n\\output=\\expandafter{\\the\\@tempa}\n\n% Now we add two cases to Stephan's output routine. (New v4.00)\n\n\\@tempa={%\n% (/New 4.2)\n \\LineNoTest\n \\if@tempswa\n%% \n%% (UL) Learnt that even in def.s blank line means ~\\par~. \n%% to leave visual space in present file with having a\n%% blank line neither in present nor in .tex file, \n%% use double comment mark (`%%'). (/UL) \n%% \n% (New v4.00)\n% We insert recognition of waiting ~\\linelabel~ items--- \n%% \n \\ifnum\\outputpenalty=-\\@Mllbcodepen \n \\WriteLineNo \n%%\n% ---and of waiting ~\\vadjust~ items: \n%% \n \\else \n \\ifnum\\outputpenalty=-\\@Mppvacodepen \n \\PassVadjustList \n \\else \n%% \n%% Now we give control back to Stephan. \n% (/New v4.00) (New v4.2) Outsource ``Standard'' output \n% ---which occurs so rarely---to subsection_\\ref{ss:LLO}: \n%% \n \\LineNoLaTeXOutput \n% (/New v4.2) (New v4.00) \n% Two new ~\\fi~s for the ~\\linelabel~ and ~\\vadjust~ tests--- \n%% \n \\fi \n \\fi \n%%\n% ---and the remaining is \n%%%next three lines are \n% Stephan's code again: \n% (/New v4.00) \n%%\n \\else \n \\MakeLineNo\n \\fi\n }\n \n% (New v4.00) Our new macros \n% ~\\WriteLineNo~ and ~\\PassVadjustList~ will be dealt with in \n% sections_\\ref{s:LNref} and_\\ref{ss:PVadj}. (/New v4.00) \n% \n% \\subsection{%\n% \\scs{LineNoTest}\n% \\unskip} \n% \n% The float mechanism inserts ~\\interlinepenalty~s during\n% ~\\output~. So carefully reset it before going on. Else\n% we get doubled line numbers on every float placed in\n% horizontal mode, e.g, from ~\\linelabel~. \n%\n% Sorry, neither a ~\\linelabel~ nor a ~\\marginpar~ should\n% insert a penalty, else the following linenumber\n% could go to the next page. Nor should any other\n% float. So let us suppress the ~\\interlinepenalty~ \n% altogether with the ~\\@nobreak~ switch.\n%\n% Since (ltspace.dtx, v1.2p)[1996/07/26], the ~\\@nobreaktrue~ does\n% it's job globally. We need to do it locally here.\n\n\\def\\LineNoTest{%\n \\let\\@@par\\@@@par\n \\ifnum\\interlinepenalty<-\\linenopenaltypar\n \\advance\\interlinepenalty-\\linenopenalty\n \\@LN@nobreaktrue\n \\fi\n \\@tempswatrue\n \\ifnum\\outputpenalty>-\\linenopenaltypar\\else\n \\ifnum\\outputpenalty>-188000\\relax\n \\@tempswafalse\n \\fi\n \\fi\n }\n\n\\def\\@LN@nobreaktrue{\\let\\if@nobreak\\iftrue} % renamed v4.33\n\n% (UL) I thought here were \n% another case of the save stack problem explained in \\TeX book, \n% p._301, namely through both local and global changing \n% ~\\if@nobreak~. However, ~\\@LN@nobreak~ is called during \n% ~\\@LN@output~ only, while ~\\@nobreaktrue~ is called by \\LaTeX's \n% ~\\@startsection~ only. The latter never happens during \n% ~\\@LN@output~. So there is no local value of ~\\if@nobreak~ on \n% save stack when ~\\@nobreaktrue~ acts, since ~\\the\\@LN@output~ \n% (where ~\\@LN@output~ is a new name for the original ~\\output~) \n% is executed within a group (\\TeX book p._21).\n%%\n%% 2004/09/19 Removed nonsense here according to Stephan 2004/09/04.\n%% \n% (/UL) \n%\n% \\subsection{%\n% Other output routines (v4.2)\n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:LLO} \n% \n% I had thought of dealing with bad interference of footnotes \n% (and ~\\enlargethispage~) with (real) ~\\marginpar~s and floats \n% \\emph{here}. Yet this is done in \n% \\[\n% ~http://~\\mbox{[CTAN]}\n% ~/macros/latex/contrib/tamefloats/tameflts.sty~\n% \\]\n% now, and I prefer striving for compatibility with the latter. \n% (See there for expanding on the problem.)\n% This requires returning the special absolute value of \n% ~\\holdinginserts~ that ~lineno.sty~ finds at the end of a newly \n% typeset paragraph---now done in subsection_\\ref{ss:calls}\n% (~\\linenumberpar~). \n% The former ~\\LineNoHoldInsertsTest~ has been filled into here. \n%% ---`3' is replaced by ~\\thr@@~ for a while. ~\\thr@@~ is \n%% useful practice since plain \\TeX, but Stephan may have been \n%% wise in suspecting that \\LaTeX\\ once could forsake ~\\thr@@~. \n%% The same holds for ~\\@M=10000~. \n% Note: when the following code is invoked, we have \n% ~\\if@tempswa~_ =_~\\iftrue~. \n% WARNING: I am still not sure whether the present code is good \n% for cooperating with other packages that use ~\\holdinginserts~. \n\n\\def\\LineNoLaTeXOutput{% \n \\ifnum \\holdinginserts=\\thr@@ % v4.33 without \\@tempswafalse\n \\global\\holdinginserts-\\thr@@ \n \\unvbox\\@cclv \n \\ifnum \\outputpenalty=\\@M \\else \\penalty\\outputpenalty \\fi \n \\else\n \\if@twocolumn \\let\\@makecol\\@LN@makecol \\fi\n \\the\\@LN@output % finally following David Kastrup's advice. \n \\ifnum \\holdinginserts=-\\thr@@ \n \\global\\holdinginserts\\thr@@ \\fi \n \\fi\n}\n\n% \\textit{More on dealing with output routines from other \n% packages:} \n% Since ~lineno.sty~'s output routine is called at least once \n% for each output line, I think it should be in \\TeX's \n% original ~\\output~, while output routines dealing with \n% building pages and with floats etc.\\ should be filled into \n% registers addressed by ~\\output~ after ~\\newtoks\\output~. \n% Therefore \\begin{enumerate}\n% \\item \n% ~tameflts.sty~ should be loaded \\emph{after} ~lineno.sty~; \n% \\item \n% if a class changes ~\\output~ (APS journal class revtex4, \n% e.g.), ~lineno.sty~ should be loaded by ~\\RequirePackage~ \n% [here presumably following some options in \n% brackets]~{lineno}~ \\emph{preceding} ~\\documentclass~. \n% \\item \n% If you actually maintain such a class, please consider \n% loading ~lineno.sty~ on some draft option. The bunch of \n% lineno's package options may be a problem, but perhaps the \n% purpose of your class is offering only very few of lineno's \n% options anyway, maybe just one. \n% \\end{enumerate} \n% The latter may also be needed with classes that don't follow \n% David Kastrup's rule on changing ~\\output~. \n% \n% \\subsection{%\n% \\scs{MakeLineNo}: Actually attach line number \n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:MLN} \n% \n% We have to return all the page to the current page, and\n% add a box with the line number, without adding\n% breakpoints, glue or space. The depth of our line number\n% should be equal to the previous depth of the page, in\n% case the page breaks here, and the box has to be moved up\n% by that depth. \n%\n% The ~\\interlinepenalty~ comes after the ~\\vadjust~ from a\n% ~\\linelabel~, so we increment the line number \\emph{after}\n% printing it. The macro ~\\makeLineNumber~ produces the\n% text of the line number, see section \\ref{appearance}.\n% \n% (UL) I needed a while to understand \n% the sentence on incrementing. Correctly: writing the \n% ~\\newlabel~ to the .aux file is triggered by the signal \n% penalty that ~\\end@float~ inserts via ~\\vadjust~. \n% However, this could be changed by our new ~\\PostponeVadjust~. \n% After ~\\c@linenumber~ has been introduced as a \\LaTeX\\ \n% counter, it might be preferable that it behaved like standard \n% \\LaTeX\\ counters which are incremented shortly before printing. \n% But this may be of little practical relevance in this case, \n% as ~\\c@linenumber~ is driven in a very non-standard \n% way.---However still, this behaviour of ~\\c@linenumber~ \n% generates a problem with our ~edtable.sty~. \n%% \\unskip---Before, \n%% I thought that Stephan had reported his reasoning incorrectly \n%% and rather did this because of his ~\\resetlinenumber~ which \n%% initializes ~\\c@linenumber~ to 1 instead of 0---the latter is \n%% usual with \\LaTeX\\ counters. Cf._additional comment at \n%% ~\\resetlinenumber~. \n% (/UL). \n%\n% Finally we put in the natural ~\\interlinepenalty~, except\n% after the last line. \n%\n% (New v3.10) Frank Mittelbach points out that box255 may be \n% less deep than the last box inside, so he proposes to \n% measure the page depth with ~\\boxmaxdepth=\\maxdimen~.\n% (/New v3.10)\n% \n% (UL, New v4.00) We also resume the matter of \n% ~\\vadjust~ items that was started in section_\\ref{ss:output}. \n% \n% \\TeX\\ puts only nonzero interline \n% penalties into the vertical list (\\TeX book p._105), while \n% ~lineno.sty~ formerly replaced the signal interline penalty by \n% something closing with an explicit penalty of the value that \n% the interline penalty would have without ~lineno.sty~. \n% This is usually 0. Now, explicit vertical penalties can be \n% very nasty with respect to ~\\nopagebreak~, e.g., a low (even \n% positive) ~\\widowpenalty~ may force a widow where you \n% explicitly tried to forbid it by ~\\nopagebreak~ \n% (see explanation soon below). \n% The ~\\nopagebreak~ we create here would never work if all \n% those zero penalties were present.---On \n% the other hand, we cannot just omit Stephan's zero penalties, \n% because \\TeX\\ puts a penalty of 10000 after what ~lineno.sty~ \n% inserts (\\TeX book p._125). This penalty must be overridden \n% to allow page breaks between ordinary lines. To revive \n% ~\\nopagebreak~, we therefore replace those zero (or low) \n% penalties by penalties that the user demanded by \n% ~\\nopagebreak~.---This mechanism is not perfect and does not \n% exactly restore the original \\LaTeX\\ working of ~\\pagebreak~ \n% and ~\\nopagebreak~. Viz., if there are several vertical \n% penalties after a line which were produced by closely sitting \n% ~\\[no]pagebreak~s, without ~lineno.sty~ the lowest penalty would \n% be effective (cf._\\TeX book exercise_14.10). Our mechanism, by \n% contrast, chooses the \\emph{last} user-set penalty of the line \n% as the effective one. It would not be very difficult to come \n% more close to the original mechanism, but until someone urges \n% us we will cling to the present simple way. You may consider an \n% advantage of the difference between our mechanism and the \n% original one that the user here can actually override low \n% penalties by ~\\nopagebreak~, which may be what a lay \\LaTeX\\ \n% user would expect. \n%% ---Zero glue would do instead of zero \n%% penalty! This could make things easier. Maybe next time. \n%% <- v4.4: No, problem with column depth. \n% (/UL, /New v4.00) \n\n\\def\\MakeLineNo{%\n \\@LN@maybe@normalLineNumber % v4.31 \n \\boxmaxdepth\\maxdimen\\setbox\\z@\\vbox{\\unvbox\\@cclv}%\n \\@tempdima\\dp\\z@ \\unvbox\\z@\n \\sbox\\@tempboxa{\\hb@xt@\\z@{\\makeLineNumber}}%\n%% \n% (New v4.00) Previously, \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% % \\stepcounter{linenumber}%\n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old}\n%% %% TODO: Still first `\\begin{old}'?\n% followed. (Of course, there was no \n% comment mark; I put it there to make \n% reading the actual code easy.) \n% \n% (New v4.22: improved) Why not just \n% \\[~\\global\\advance\\c@linenumber\\@ne~?\\]\n% ~\\stepcounter~ additionally resets ``subordinate'' \n% counters, but which could these (usefully) be? \n% Again, may be column counters with ~edtable.sty~!? \n% \n% But then, our ~edtable.sty~ and its ~longtable~ option \n% should use it as well. So use a shorthand supporting \n% uniformity. You can even use it as a hook for choosing \n% ~\\global\\advance\\c@linenumber\\@ne~ instead of our choice. \n% (/New v4.22) \n%% \n \\stepLineNumber\n%% \n% (New v4.4) Now \n%% \n \\ht\\@tempboxa\\z@ \\@LN@depthbox \n%% \n% appends the box containing the line number without changing \n% ~\\prevdepth~---see end of section. \n% Now is the time for inserting the $\\dots$ (/New v4.4) \n%% The line number has now been placed (it may be invisible \n%% depending on the modulo feature), so \n%% we can insert the \n% ~\\vadjust~ items. We cannot do this much later, because \n% their right place is above the artificial interline \n% penalty which Stephan's code will soon insert \n% (cf._\\TeX book p._105). The next command is just ~\\relax~ \n% if no ~\\vadjust~ items have been accumulated for the \n% current line. Otherwise it is a list macro inserting \n% the ~\\vadjust~ items and finally resetting itself. \n% (This is made in section_\\ref{ss:PVadj} below.)\n% If the final item is a penalty, it is stored so it can \n% compete with other things about page breaking. \n%% \n \\@LN@do@vadjusts \n \\count@\\lastpenalty \n%% \n% At this place, \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% % \\ifnum\\outputpenalty=-\\linenopenaltypar\\else\n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old}\n% originally followed. We need something \\emph{before} the \n% ~\\else~: \n%% \n \\ifnum\\outputpenalty=-\\linenopenaltypar \n \\ifnum\\count@=\\z@ \\else \n%% \n% So final ~\\pagebreak[0]~ or ~\\nopagebreak[0]~ has no \n% effect---but this will make a difference after headings only, \n% where nobody should place such a thing anyway. \n%% \n \\xdef\\@LN@parpgbrk{% \n \\penalty\\the\\count@\n \\global\\let\\noexpand\\@LN@parpgbrk\n \\noexpand\\@LN@screenoff@pen}% v4.4 \n%% \n% That penalty will replace former ~\\kern\\z@~ in \n% ~\\linenumberpar~, see subsection_\\ref{ss:calls}.---A\n% few days earlier, I tried to send just a penalty value. \n% However, the ~\\kern\\z@~ in ~\\linenumberpar~ is crucial, \n% as I then found out. See below.---The final penalty is \n% repeated, but this does no harm. (It would not be very \n% difficult to avoid the repeating, but it may even be \n% less efficient.) It may be repeated due to the previous \n% ~\\xdef~, but it may be repeated as well below in the \n% present macro where artificial interline penalty is to \n% be overridden.\n%% \n \\fi\n \\else\n%% \n% (/New v4.00) \n%% Corrected code alignment with v4.11. \n \\@tempcnta\\outputpenalty\n \\advance\\@tempcnta -\\linenopenalty\n%% \n% (New v4.00) \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% % \\penalty\\@tempcnta\n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old}\n% followed previously. To give ~\\nopagebreak~ a chance, \n% we do \n%% Corrected code alignment with v4.11. \n \\penalty \\ifnum\\count@<\\@tempcnta \\@tempcnta \\else \\count@ \\fi \n%% \n% instead.---In ~linenox0.sty~, the ~\\else~ thing once was omitted. \n% Sergei Mariev's complaint (thanks!) showed that it is vital \n% (see comment before ~\\MakeLineNo~). \n% The remaining ~\\fi~ from previous package version closes the \n% ~\\ifnum\\outputpenalty~\\dots \n% (/New v4.00) \n%% \n \\fi\n }\n\n% (New v4.00) \n\n\\newcommand\\stepLineNumber{\\stepcounter{linenumber}} \n\n% For reason, see use above. (/New v4.00) \n%% %% TODO v4.4+: ~\\newcommand~ more often!? \n% \n% (New v4.4) The depth preserving trick is drawn here from \n% ~\\MakeLineNo~ because it will be used again in \n% section_\\ref{ss:calls}.\n\n\\def\\@LN@depthbox{% \n \\dp\\@tempboxa=\\@tempdima\n \\nointerlineskip \\kern-\\@tempdima \\box\\@tempboxa} \n\n% (/New v4.4) \n% \n% \\section{%\n% Control line numbering \n% \\unskip}\n% \\subsection{%\n% Inserting \\scs{output} calls %% own subsec. v4.4. \n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:calls}\n% The line numbering is controlled via ~\\par~. \\LaTeX\\\n% saved the \\TeX-primitive ~\\par~ in ~\\@@par~. We push it\n% one level further out, and redefine ~\\@@par~ to insert\n% the ~\\interlinepenalty~ needed to trigger the\n% line numbering. And we need to allow pagebreaks after a\n% paragraph. \n% \n% New (2.05beta): the prevgraf test. A paragraph that ends with a\n% displayed equation, a ~\\noindent\\par~ or ~wrapfig.sty~ produce empty\n% paragraphs. These should not get a spurious line number via\n% ~\\linenopenaltypar~. \n\n\\let\\@@@par\\@@par\n\\newcount\\linenoprevgraf\n\n% (UL) And needs ~\\linenoprevgraf~ \n% to be a counter? Perhaps there may be a paragraph having \n% thousands of lines, so ~\\mathchardef~ doesn't suffice (really??). \n%%\n%% %% TODO: limitations of lines per paragraph elsewhere? \n%% %% Signal penalties, e.g.!? ~\\deadcycles~!? \n%%\n% A macro ending on ~\\relax~ might suffice, but would be \n% somewhat slow. I think I will use ~\\mathchardef~ next time. \n% Or has any user used ~\\linenoprevgraf~? (/UL) \n\n%% v4.33: changed code alignment for better understanding. \n\\def\\linenumberpar{% \n \\ifvmode \\@@@par \\else \n \\ifinner \\@@@par \\else\n \\xdef\\@LN@outer@holdins{\\the\\holdinginserts}% v4.2 \n \\advance \\interlinepenalty \\linenopenalty\n \\linenoprevgraf \\prevgraf\n \\global \\holdinginserts \\thr@@ \n \\@@@par\n \\ifnum\\prevgraf>\\linenoprevgraf\n \\penalty-\\linenopenaltypar\n \\fi\n%% \n% (New v4.00) \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% % \\kern\\z@ \n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old}\n% was here previously. What for? \n% According to \\TeX book p._125, Stephan's \n% interline penalty is changed into 10000. At the end of a \n% paragraph, the ~\\parskip~ would follow that penalty of 10000, \n% so there could be a page break neither at the \n% ~\\parskip~ nor at the ~\\baselineskip~ (\\TeX book p._110)---so \n% there could never be a page break between two paragraphs. \n% So something must screen off the 10000 penalty. \n% Indeed, the ~\\kern~ is a place to break. \n% (Stephan once knew this: see `allow pagebreaks' above.)\n% \n% Formerly, I tried to replace ~\\kern\\z@~ by \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% % \\penalty\\@LN@parpgpen\\relax \n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old}\n% ---but this allows a page break after heading. So: \n%% \n \\@LN@parpgbrk \n%% \n%% After heading, ~\\kern\\z@~ resulting from previous line \n%% (see below) is followed by ~\\write~ or ~\\penalty10000~, \n%% so causes no page break. \n% \n% These and similar changes were formerly done by ~linenox1.sty~. \n% (/New v4.00) \n% \n% (New v4.4) \n% A ~\\belowdisplayskip~ may precede the previous when the paragraph \n% ends on a display-math; or there may be a ~\\topsep~ from a list, etc. \n% ~\\addvspace~ couldn't take account for it with ~\\kern\\z@~ \n% here. v4.32 therefore moved the space down -- with at least two \n% bad consequences. \n% Moreover, David Josef Dev observes that ~\\kern\\z@~ may \n% inappropriately yield column depth 0pt. \n% For these reasons, we introduce ~\\@LN@screenoff@pen~ below. \n% (/New v4.4) \n%% \n \\global\\holdinginserts\\@LN@outer@holdins % v4.2\n \\advance\\interlinepenalty -\\linenopenalty\n \\fi % from \\ifinner ... \\else \n \\fi} % from \\ifvmode ... \\else \n\n% (New v4.00, v4.4) Initialize ~\\@LN@parpgbrk~, accounting \n% for earlier space and for appropriate columndepth. \n% We use former ~\\MakeLineNo~'s depth-preverving trick \n% ~\\@LN@depthbox~ again: \n\n\\def\\@LN@screenoff@pen{% \n \\ifdim\\lastskip=\\z@ \n \\@tempdima\\prevdepth \\setbox\\@tempboxa\\null \n \\@LN@depthbox \\fi}\n\n\\global\\let\\@LN@parpgbrk\\@LN@screenoff@pen \n\n% (/New v4.4, v4.00) \n% \\subsection{%\n% Turning on/off %% own subsec. v4.4.\n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:OnOff}\n% The basic commands to enable and disable line numbers.\n% ~\\@par~ and ~\\par~ are only touched, when they are ~\\let~ \n% to ~\\@@@par~/~\\linenumberpar~. The line number may be\n% reset to 1 with the star-form, or set by an optional\n% argument ~[~<number>~]~. \n% \n% (New v4.00) We add ~\\ifLineNumbers~ etc.\\ since \n% a number of our new adjustments need to know whether \n% linenumbering is active. This just provides a kind of \n% shorthand for ~\\ifx\\@@par\\linenumberpar~; moreover it is \n% more stable: who knows what may happen to ~\\@@par~?---A \n% caveat: ~\\ifLineNumbers~ may be wrong. E.g., it may be \n% ~\\iffalse~ where it acts, while a ~\\linenumbers~ a few \n% lines below---in the same paragraph---brings about that \n% the line where the ~\\ifLineNumbers~ appears gets a \n% marginal number. \n%% Better implementation suggested below. \n%% \n% (New v4.3) Just noticed: Such tricks have been \n% disallowed with v4.11, see subsections_\\ref{ss:LL} \n% and_\\ref{ss:OnOff}.---Moreover, the switching between\n% meanings of ~\\linelabel~ for a possible error message \n% as of v4.11 is removed. Speed is difficult to esteem \n% and also depends on applications. Just use the most \n% simple code you find. (/New v4.3) \n\n\\newif\\ifLineNumbers \\LineNumbersfalse \n\n% (/New v4.00) \n\n\\def\\linenumbers{% \n \\LineNumberstrue % v4.00 \n \\xdef\\@LN@outer@holdins{\\the\\holdinginserts}% v4.3 \n%%\n% (New v4.3) The previous line is for ~{linenomath}~ \n% in a first numbered paragraph. (/New v4.3) \n%% \n \\let\\@@par\\linenumberpar\n % \\let\\linelabel\\@LN@linelabel % v4.11, removed v4.3 \n \\ifx\\@par\\@@@par\\let\\@par\\linenumberpar\\fi\n \\ifx\\par\\@@@par\\let\\par\\linenumberpar\\fi\n \\@LN@maybe@moduloresume % v4.31 \n \\@ifnextchar[{\\resetlinenumber}%]\n {\\@ifstar{\\resetlinenumber}{}}%\n }\n\n\\def\\nolinenumbers{% \n \\LineNumbersfalse % v4.00\n \\let\\@@par\\@@@par\n % \\let\\linelabel\\@LN@LLerror % v4.11, removed v4.3 \n \\ifx\\@par\\linenumberpar\\let\\@par\\@@@par\\fi\n \\ifx\\par\\linenumberpar\\let\\par\\@@@par\\fi\n }\n\n% (New v4.00) Moreover, it is useful to switch to \n% ~\\nolinenumbers~ in ~\\@arrayparboxrestore~. We postpone this \n% to section_\\ref{ss:ReDef} where we'll have an appending macro \n% for doing this. (/New v4.00) \n% \n% What happens with a display math? Since ~\\par~ is not executed,\n% when breaking the lines before a display, they will not get\n% line numbers. Sorry, but I do not dare to change\n% ~\\interlinepenalty~ globally, nor do I want to redefine\n% the display math environments here.\n% \\begin{displaymath}\n% display \\ math\n% \\end{displaymath}\n% See the subsection below, for a wrapper environment to make\n% it work. But that requires to wrap each and every display\n% in your \\LaTeX\\ source %%.\n%% v4.3: \n% (see option ~displaymath~ in subsections_\\ref{ss:v3opts} \n% and_\\ref{ss:display} for some relief [UL]). \n%\n% The next two commands are provided to turn on line\n% numbering in a specific mode. Please note the difference:\n% for pagewise numbering, ~\\linenumbers~ comes first to\n% inhibit it from seeing optional arguments, since\n% re-/presetting the counter is useless. \n\n\\def\\pagewiselinenumbers{\\linenumbers\\setpagewiselinenumbers}\n\\def\\runninglinenumbers{\\setrunninglinenumbers\\linenumbers}\n\n% Finally, it is a \\LaTeX\\ style, so we provide for the use\n% of environments, including the suppression of the\n% following paragraph's indentation.\n% \n%% TODO: v4.4+: \n% (UL) I am drawing the following \n% private thoughts of Stephan's to publicity so that others may \n% think about them---or to remind myself of them in an efficient \n% way. (/UL) \n%% UL changed `%%%' to `% %' below. \n%% TODO: add \\par to \\linenumbers, if called from an environment. %% v4.3 \n%% ToDO: add an \\@endpe hack if \\linenumbers are turned on\n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim} \n% % TO DO: add \\par to \\linenumbers, if called from an environment.\n% % To DO: add an \\@endpe hack if \\linenumbers are turned on\n% % in horizontal mode. {\\par\\parskip\\z@\\noindent} or\n% % something.\n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old} \n% (UL) However, I rather think that ~\\linenumbers~ and %% v4.31 \n% ~\\nolinenumbers~ should execute a ~\\par~ already. (Then the \n% ~\\par~s in the following definitions should be removed.) (/UL) \n\n\\@namedef{linenumbers*}{\\par\\linenumbers*}\n\\@namedef{runninglinenumbers*}{\\par\\runninglinenumbers*}\n\n\\def\\endlinenumbers{\\par\\@endpetrue}\n\\let\\endrunninglinenumbers\\endlinenumbers\n\\let\\endpagewiselinenumbers\\endlinenumbers\n\\expandafter\\let\\csname endlinenumbers*\\endcsname\\endlinenumbers\n\\expandafter\\let\\csname endrunninglinenumbers*\\endcsname\\endlinenumbers\n\\let\\endnolinenumbers\\endlinenumbers\n\n%\n% \\subsection{%\n% Display math\n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:DM}\n%\n% Now we tackle the problem to get display math working. \n% There are different options.\n% \\begin{enumerate}\\item[\n% 1.] Precede every display math with a ~\\par~. \n% Not too good.\n% \\item[\n% 2.] Change ~\\interlinepenalty~ and associates globally. \n% Unstable.\n% \\item[\n% 3.] Wrap each display math with a ~{linenomath}~ \n% environment. \n% \\end{enumerate}\n% We'll go for option 3. See if it works: \n% \\begin{linenomath}\n% \\begin{equation}\n% display \\ math\n% \\end{equation}\n% \\end{linenomath}\n% The star form ~{linenomath*}~ should also number the lines\n% of the display itself,\n% \\begin{linenomath*}\n% \\begin{eqnarray}\n% multi && line \\\\\n% display && math \\\\\n% & \n% \\begin{array}{c}\n% with \\\\\n% array\n% \\end{array}\n% &\n% \\end{eqnarray}\n% \\end{linenomath*}\n% including multline displays.\n% \n% First, here are two macros to turn\n% on linenumbering on paragraphs preceeding displays, with\n% numbering the lines of the display itself, or without.\n% The ~\\ifx..~ tests if line numbering is turned on. It\n% does not harm to add these wrappers in sections that are\n% not numbered. Nor does it harm to wrap a display\n% twice, e.q, in case you have some ~{equation}~s wrapped\n% explicitely, and later you redefine ~\\equation~ to do it\n% automatically. \n% \n% (New v4.3) To avoid the spurious line number above a \n% display in vmode, I insert ~\\ifhmode~. (/New v4.3) \n\n\\newcommand\\linenomathNonumbers{%\n \\ifLineNumbers \n%% \\ifx\\@@par\\@@@par\\else \n \\ifnum\\interlinepenalty>-\\linenopenaltypar\n \\global\\holdinginserts\\thr@@ \n \\advance\\interlinepenalty \\linenopenalty\n \\ifhmode % v4.3 \n \\advance\\predisplaypenalty \\linenopenalty\n \\fi \n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\ignorespaces\n }\n\n\\newcommand\\linenomathWithnumbers{%\n \\ifLineNumbers \n%% \\ifx\\@@par\\@@@par\\else\n \\ifnum\\interlinepenalty>-\\linenopenaltypar\n \\global\\holdinginserts\\thr@@ \n \\advance\\interlinepenalty \\linenopenalty\n \\ifhmode % v4.3 \n \\advance\\predisplaypenalty \\linenopenalty\n \\fi \n \\advance\\postdisplaypenalty \\linenopenalty\n \\advance\\interdisplaylinepenalty \\linenopenalty\n \\fi\n \\fi\n \\ignorespaces\n }\n\n% The ~{linenomath}~ environment has two forms, with and\n% without a star. The following two macros define the\n% environment, where the stared/non-stared form does/doesn't number the\n% lines of the display or vice versa.\n\n\\newcommand\\linenumberdisplaymath{%\n \\def\\linenomath{\\linenomathWithnumbers}%\n \\@namedef{linenomath*}{\\linenomathNonumbers}%\n }\n\n\\newcommand\\nolinenumberdisplaymath{%\n \\def\\linenomath{\\linenomathNonumbers}%\n \\@namedef{linenomath*}{\\linenomathWithnumbers}%\n }\n\n\\def\\endlinenomath{% \n \\ifLineNumbers % v4.3 \n \\global\\holdinginserts\\@LN@outer@holdins % v4.21 \n \\fi \n \\global % v4.21 support for LaTeX2e earlier than 1996/07/26. \n \\@ignoretrue\n}\n\\expandafter\\let\\csname endlinenomath*\\endcsname\\endlinenomath\n\n% The default is not to number the lines of a display. But\n% the package option ~mathlines~ may be used to switch\n% that behavior.\n\n\\nolinenumberdisplaymath\n\n%\n% \\section{%\n% Line number references\n% \\unskip}\\label{s:LNref} \n% \\subsection{% \n% Internals %% New subsec. v4.3. \n% \\unskip}\n% The only way to get a label to a line number in a\n% paragraph is to ask the output routine to mark it.\n%\n% (New v4.00) The following two paragraphs don't hold any \n% longer, see below. (/New v4.00) \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% % We use the marginpar mechanism to hook to ~\\output~ for a\n% % second time. Marginpars are floats with number $-1$, we\n% % fake marginpars with No $-2$. Originally, every negative\n% % numbered float was considered to be a marginpar.\n% % \n% % The float box number ~\\@currbox~ is used to transfer the\n% % label name in a macro called ~\\@LNL@~<box-number>.\n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old}\n% A ~\\newlabel~ is written to the aux-file. The reference\n% is to ~\\theLineNumber~, \\emph{not} ~\\thelinenumber~.\n% This allows to hook in, as done below for pagewise line\n% numbering. \n%\n% (New v3.03) The ~\\@LN@ExtraLabelItems~ are added for a hook\n% to keep packages like ~{hyperref}~ happy. (/New v3.03)\n% \n% (New v4.00) \n% We fire the ~\\marginpar~ mechanism, so we leave \\LaTeX's \n% ~\\@addmarginpar~ untouched. \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% % \\let\\@LN@addmarginpar\\@addmarginpar\n% % \\def\\@addmarginpar{%\n% % \\ifnum\\count\\@currbox>-2\\relax\n% % \\expandafter\\@LN@addmarginpar\n% % \\else\n% % \\@cons\\@freelist\\@currbox\n% % \\protected@write\\@auxout{}{%\n% % \\string\\newlabel\n% % {\\csname @LNL@\\the\\@currbox\\endcsname}%\n% % {{\\theLineNumber}{\\thepage}\\@LN@ExtraLabelItems}}%\n% % \\fi}\n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old}\n% OK, we keep Stephan's ~\\@LN@ExtraLabelItems~: \n% (/New v4.00) \n\n\\let\\@LN@ExtraLabelItems\\@empty\n\n% (New v4.00) \n% We imitate the ~\\marginpar~ mechanism without using the \n% ~\\@freelist~ boxes. ~\\linelabel~ will indeed place a signal \n% penalty (~\\@Mllbcodepen~, new), and it will put a label into \n% some list macro ~\\@LN@labellist~. A new part of the output \n% routine will take the labels from the list and will write \n% ~\\newlabel~s to the .aux file. \n% \n% The following is a version of \\LaTeX's ~\\@xnext~.\n\n\\def\\@LN@xnext#1\\@lt#2\\@@#3#4{\\def#3{#1}\\gdef#4{#2}}\n\n% This takes an item ~#1~ from a list ~#4~ into ~#3~; \n% to be used as ~\\expandafter\\@LN@xnext#4\\@@#3#4~. \n% Our lists use ~\\@lt~ after each item for separating. \n% Indeed, there will be another list macro which can \n% appear as argument ~#4~, this will be used for moving \n% ~\\vadjust~ items (section_\\ref{ss:PVadj}). \n% The list for ~\\linelabel~s is the following: \n\n\\global\\let\\@LN@labellist\\@empty \n\n% The next is the new part of the output routine writing the \n% ~\\newlabel~ to the .aux file. Since it is no real page output, \n% the page is put back to top of the main vertical list. \n\n\\def\\WriteLineNo{% \n \\unvbox\\@cclv \n \\expandafter \\@LN@xnext \\@LN@labellist \\@@ \n \\@LN@label \\@LN@labellist \n \\protected@write\\@auxout{}{\\string\\newlabel{\\@LN@label}% \n {{\\theLineNumber}{\\thepage}\\@LN@ExtraLabelItems}}% \n}\n\n% (/New v4.00)\n% \n% \\subsection{%\n% The \\scs{linelabel} command\n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:LL}\n% To refer to a place in line ~\\ref{~<foo>~}~ at page\n% ~\\pageref{~<foo>~}~ you place a ~\\linelabel{~<foo>~}~ at\n% that place.\n%\n% \\linelabel{demo}\n% \\marginpar{\\tiny\\raggedright\n% See if it works: This paragraph\n% starts on page \\pageref{demo}, line\n% \\ref{demo}. \n% \\unskip}%\n% (New v4.11) \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% % If you use this command outside a ~\\linenumbers~\n% % paragraph, you will get references to some bogus\n% % line numbers, sorry. But we don't disable the command,\n% % because only the ~\\par~ at the end of a paragraph may\n% % decide whether to print line numbers on this paragraph\n% % or not. A ~\\linelabel~ may legally appear earlier than\n% % ~\\linenumbers~.\n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old} \n% This trick is better not allowed---see subsections_\\ref{ss:LL} \n% and_\\ref{ss:OnOff}.\n% (/New v4.11)\n%\n% ~\\linelabel~ \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% %, via a fake float number $-2$, %% new mechanism v4.00\n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old}\n% puts a\n% ~\\penalty~ into a ~\\vadjust~, which triggers the\n% pagebuilder after putting the current line to the main\n% vertical list. A ~\\write~ is placed on the main vertical\n% list, which prints a reference to the current value of\n% ~\\thelinenumber~ and ~\\thepage~ at the time of the\n% ~\\shipout~.\n%\n% A ~\\linelabel~ is allowed only in outer horizontal mode.\n% In outer vertical mode we start a paragraph, and ignore\n% trailing spaces (by fooling ~\\@esphack~).\n% \n% (New v4.00) We aim at relaxing the previous condition. \n% We insert a hook ~\\@LN@mathhook~ and a shorthand \n% ~\\@LN@postlabel~ to support the ~mathrefs~ option which \n% allows ~\\linelabel~ in math mode. \n%\n% The next paragraph is no longer valid. \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% % The argument of ~\\linelabel~ is put into a macro with a\n% % name derived from the number of the allocated float box.\n% % Much of the rest is dummy float setup.\n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old}\n% (/New v4.00) \n%\n% (New v4.11) \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim} \n% % \\def\\linelabel#1{%\n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old} \n% I forgot ~\\linenumbers~ today, costed me hours or so. \n\n\\def\\@LN@LLerror{\\PackageError{lineno}{% \n \\string\\linelabel\\space without \\string\\linenumbers}{% \n Just see documentation. (New feature v4.11)}\\@gobble}\n\n% (New v4.3) Here some things have changed for v4.3. \n% The previous ~#1~ has been replaced by ~\\@gobble~. \n% Ensuing, the ~\\linelabel~ error message is re-implemented. \n% I find it difficult to compare efficiency of slight \n% alternatives---so choose an easy one. Explicit switching \n% in ~\\linenumbers~ and ~\\nolinenumbers~ is an additional \n% command that may better be avoided. \n\n\\newcommand\\linelabel{% \n \\ifLineNumbers \\expandafter \\@LN@linelabel \n \\else \\expandafter \\@LN@LLerror \\fi}\n%%\\let\\linelabel\\@LN@LLerror \n\n\\gdef\\@LN@linelabel#1{% \n%% \n% ~\\gdef~ for hyperref ``symbolically''. (/New v4.11) \n%% \n \\ifx\\protect\\@typeset@protect \n%% \n% $\\gets$ And a ~\\linelabel~ should never be replicated in a \n% mark or a TOC entry. (/New v4.3) \n%% \n \\ifvmode\n \\ifinner \\else \n \\leavevmode \\@bsphack \\@savsk\\p@\n \\fi\n \\else\n \\@bsphack\n \\fi\n \\ifhmode\n \\ifinner\n \\@parmoderr\n \\else\n%% \n% (New v4.00) \n%% \n \\@LN@postlabel{#1}% \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% % \\@floatpenalty -\\@Mii\n% % \\@next\\@currbox\\@freelist\n% % {\\global\\count\\@currbox-2%\n% % \\expandafter\\gdef\\csname @LNL@\\the\\@currbox\\endcsname{#1}}%\n% % {\\@floatpenalty\\z@ \\@fltovf \\def\\@currbox{\\@tempboxa}}%\n% % \\begingroup\n% % \\setbox\\@currbox \\color@vbox \\vbox \\bgroup \\end@float\n% % \\endgroup\n% % \\@ignorefalse \\@esphack\n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old} \n% (/New v4.00) \n%% \n \\@esphack \n%% \n% (New v4.00) \n% The ~\\@ignorefalse~ was appropriate before because the \n% ~\\@Esphack~ in ~\\end@float~ set ~\\@ignoretrue~. Cf._\\LaTeX's \n% ~\\@xympar~. (/New v4.00) \n%% \n \\fi\n \\else\n%% \n% (New v4.00) \n%% \n \\@LN@mathhook{#1}%\n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% % \\@parmoderr\n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old} \n% Instead of complaining, you may just do your job. \n% (/New v4.00) \n%% \n \\fi\n \\fi \n }\n\n% (New v4.00) The shorthand just does what happened \n% with ~linenox0.sty~ before ~ednmath0.sty~ (New v4.1: \n% now ~mathrefs~ option) appeared, and \n% the hook is initialized to serve the same purpose. \n% So errors come just where Stephan had built them in, \n% and this is just the \\LaTeX\\ ~\\marginpar~ behaviour. \n\n\\def\\@LN@postlabel#1{\\g@addto@macro\\@LN@labellist{#1\\@lt}%\n \\vadjust{\\penalty-\\@Mllbcodepen}} \n\\def\\@LN@mathhook#1{\\@parmoderr}\n\n% (/New v4.00) \n% \n% \\modulolinenumbers[3] \n% \\firstlinenumber{1}\n% \\section{%\n% The appearance of the line numbers\n% \\unskip}\\label{appearance}\n% \\subsection{%\n% Basic code %% own subsec. v4.2. \n% \\unskip}\n% \n% The line numbers are set as ~\\tiny\\sffamily\\arabic{linenumber}~,\n% $10pt$ left of the text. With options to place it\n% right of the text, or . . .\n%\n% . . . here are the hooks:\n\n\\def\\makeLineNumberLeft{% \n \\hss\\linenumberfont\\LineNumber\\hskip\\linenumbersep}\n\n\\def\\makeLineNumberRight{% \n \\linenumberfont\\hskip\\linenumbersep\\hskip\\columnwidth\n \\hb@xt@\\linenumberwidth{\\hss\\LineNumber}\\hss}\n\n\\def\\linenumberfont{\\normalfont\\tiny\\sffamily}\n\n\\newdimen\\linenumbersep\n\\newdimen\\linenumberwidth\n\n\\linenumberwidth=10pt\n\\linenumbersep=10pt\n\n% Margin switching requires ~pagewise~ numbering mode, but\n% choosing the left or right margin for the numbers always\n% works. \n\n\\def\\switchlinenumbers{\\@ifstar\n {\\let\\makeLineNumberOdd\\makeLineNumberRight\n \\let\\makeLineNumberEven\\makeLineNumberLeft}%\n {\\let\\makeLineNumberOdd\\makeLineNumberLeft\n \\let\\makeLineNumberEven\\makeLineNumberRight}%\n }\n\n\\def\\setmakelinenumbers#1{\\@ifstar\n {\\let\\makeLineNumberRunning#1%\n \\let\\makeLineNumberOdd#1%\n \\let\\makeLineNumberEven#1}%\n {\\ifx\\c@linenumber\\c@runninglinenumber\n \\let\\makeLineNumberRunning#1%\n \\else\n \\let\\makeLineNumberOdd#1%\n \\let\\makeLineNumberEven#1%\n \\fi}%\n }\n\n\\def\\leftlinenumbers{\\setmakelinenumbers\\makeLineNumberLeft}\n\\def\\rightlinenumbers{\\setmakelinenumbers\\makeLineNumberRight}\n\n\\leftlinenumbers*\n\n% ~\\LineNumber~ is a hook which is used for the modulo stuff.\n% It is the command to use for the line number, when you\n% customize ~\\makeLineNumber~. Use ~\\thelinenumber~ to\n% change the outfit of the digits.\n%\n%\n% We will implement two modes of operation:\n% \\begin{itemize}\n% \\item numbers ~running~ through (parts of) the text\n% \\item ~pagewise~ numbers starting over with one on top of\n% each page.\n% \\end{itemize}\n% Both modes have their own count register, but only one is\n% allocated as a \\LaTeX\\ counter, with the attached\n% facilities serving both.\n\n\\newcounter{linenumber}\n\\newcount\\c@pagewiselinenumber\n\\let\\c@runninglinenumber\\c@linenumber\n\n% Only the running mode counter may be reset, or preset,\n% for individual paragraphs. The pagewise counter must\n% give a unique anonymous number for each line.\n% \n% (New v4.3) ~\\newcounter{linenumber}~ \n% was the only ~\\newcounter~ in the whole package, and \n% formerly I was near using ~\\newcount~ instead. Yet \n% ~\\newcounter~ may be quite useful for ~\\includeonly~. \n% It also supports resetting ``subcounters'', but what \n% could these be? Well, ~edtable~ might introduce a \n% subcounter for columns. \n% (Note that \\LaTeX's setting commands would work with \n% ~\\newcount\\c@linenumber~ already, apart from this. \n% And perhaps sometimes ~\\refstepcounter{linenumber}~ \n% wouldn't work---cf._my discussion of ~\\stepcounter~ in \n% subsection_\\ref{ss:MLN}, similarly ~\\refstep...~ would \n% be quite useless. \n% Even the usual redefinitions of ~\\thelinenumber~ would \n% work. It is nice, on the other hand, that \n% ~\\thelinenumber~ is predefined here. \\LaTeX's \n% initialization of the value perhaps just serves making \n% clear \\LaTeX\\ counters should always be changed \n% globally.---Shortened and improved the discussion here.) \n% (/New v4.3) \n% \n% (New v4.22) \n% ~\\c@linenumber~ usually is---globally---incremented by \n% ~\\stepcounter~ (at present), so resetting it locally would \n% raise the save stack problem of \\TeX book p._301, moreover \n% it would be is useless, there is no hope of keeping the \n% values local (but see subsection_\\ref{ss:ILN}). So I insert \n% ~\\global~: (/New v4.22) \n\n\\newcommand*\\resetlinenumber[1][\\@ne]{% \n \\global % v4.22\n \\c@runninglinenumber#1\\relax}\n\n% (New v4.00) \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% % \\newcommand\\resetlinenumber[1][1]{\\c@runninglinenumber#1}\n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old}\n% Added ~\\relax~, being quite sure that this does no harm \n% and is quite important, as with ~\\setcounter~ etc. \n% I consider this a bug fix (although perhaps no user has \n% ever had a problem with this). (/New v4.00) \n% \n% (v4.22: I had made much fuss about resetting subordinate \n% counters here---removed, somewhat postponed.)\n% \n%% TODO v4.4+: \n%% \\newcommand*\\resetlinenumber[1][\\@ne]{% \n%% \\ifx\\c@linenumber\\c@runninglinenumber \n%% \\global\\c@linenumber#1\\relax\n%% \\global\\advance\\c@linenumber\\m@ne \n%% \\stepLineNumber \n%% \\else \n%% \\PackageError{lineno}%% Shorthand!? \n%% {You can't reset line number in pagewise mode}% \n%% {This should suffice.}% \n%% \\fi \n%% } \n% \n% \\subsection{%\n% Running line numbers\n% \\unskip} \n% \n% Running mode is easy, ~\\LineNumber~ and ~\\theLineNumber~\n% produce ~\\thelinenumber~, which defaults to\n% ~\\arabic{linenumber}~, using the ~\\c@runninglinenumber~\n% counter. This is the default mode of operation.\n\n\\def\\makeRunningLineNumber{\\makeLineNumberRunning}\n\n\\def\\setrunninglinenumbers{%\n \\def\\theLineNumber{\\thelinenumber}%\n \\let\\c@linenumber\\c@runninglinenumber\n \\let\\makeLineNumber\\makeRunningLineNumber\n }\n\n\\setrunninglinenumbers\\resetlinenumber\n\n%\n% \\subsection{%\n% Pagewise line numbers\n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:PW} \n% \n% Difficult, if you think about it. The number has to be\n% printed when there is no means to know on which page it\n% will end up, except through the aux-file. My solution \n% is really expensive, but quite robust. \n%\n% With version ~v2.00~ the hashsize requirements are\n% reduced, because we do not need one controlsequence for\n% each line any more. But this costs some computation time\n% to find out on which page we are.\n%\n% ~\\makeLineNumber~ gets a hook to log the line and page\n% number to the aux-file. Another hook tries to find out\n% what the page offset is, and subtracts it from the counter\n% ~\\c@linenumber~. Additionally, the switch\n% ~\\ifoddNumberedPage~ is set true for odd numbered pages,\n% false otherwise.\n\n\\def\\setpagewiselinenumbers{%\n \\let\\theLineNumber\\thePagewiseLineNumber\n \\let\\c@linenumber\\c@pagewiselinenumber\n \\let\\makeLineNumber\\makePagewiseLineNumber\n }\n\n\\def\\makePagewiseLineNumber{\\logtheLineNumber\\getLineNumber\n \\ifoddNumberedPage\n \\makeLineNumberOdd\n \\else\n \\makeLineNumberEven\n \\fi\n }\n\n% Each numbered line gives a line to the aux file\n% \\begin{verse}\n% ~\\@LN{~<line>~}{~<page>~}~\n% \\end{verse}\n% very similar to the ~\\newlabel~ business, except that we need\n% an arabic representation of the page number, not what\n% there might else be in ~\\thepage~.\n\n\\def\\logtheLineNumber{\\protected@write\\@auxout{}{%\n%% \n% (New v4.00) (UL)\n% As Daniel Doherty observed, the earlier line \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% % \\string\\@LN{\\the\\c@linenumber}{\\noexpand\\the\\c@page}}}\n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old}\n% here may lead into an infinite loop when the user resets \n% the page number (think of ~\\pagenumbering~, e.g.). \n% Stephan and I brief\\/ly discussed the matter and decided \n% to introduce a ``physical''-page counter to which \n% ~\\logtheLineNumber~ refers. It was Stephan's idea to use \n% ~\\cl@page~ for reliably augmenting the ``physical''-page \n% counter. However, this relies on the output routine once \n% doing ~\\stepcounter{page}~. Before Stephan's \n% suggestion, I had thought of appending the stepping to \n% \\LaTeX's ~\\@outputpage~.---So the macro definition ends \n% as follows. \n%% \n \\string\\@LN{\\the\\c@linenumber}{% \n%%\n% (New v4.2) \n%% \\noexpand\\number\\n@LN@truepage}}} \n%%\n% The `truepage' counter must start with ~\\c@~ so it works \n% with ~\\include~, and the ~\\@addtoreset~ below is needed \n% for the same purpose. \n%% \n \\noexpand\\the\\c@LN@truepage}}} \n\n%% \\newcount\\n@LN@truepage \n%% \\g@addto@macro\\cl@page{\\global\\advance\\n@LN@truepage\\@ne}\n\\newcount\\c@LN@truepage \n\\g@addto@macro\\cl@page{\\global\\advance\\c@LN@truepage\\@ne}\n\\@addtoreset{LN@truepage}{@ckpt}\n\n% (/New v4.2) I had thought of offering more \n% features of a \\LaTeX\\ counter. However, the user should \n% better \\emph{not} have access to this counter. ~\\c@page~ \n% should suffice as a pagewise master counter.---To be sure, \n% along the present lines the user \\emph{can} manipulate \n% ~\\c@LN@truepage~ by ~\\stepcounter{page}~. E.g., she might \n% do this in order to manually insert a photograph. Well, \n% seems not to harm. \n% \n% The above usage of ~\\g@addto@macro~ and ~\\cl@page~ may be \n% not as stable as Stephan intended. His proposal used \n% ~\\xdef~ directly. But he used ~\\cl@page~ as well, and who \n% knows \\dots{} And as to ~\\g@addto@macro~, I have introduced \n% it for list macros anyway. \n% (/UL) (/New v4.00) \n% \n% From the aux-file we get one macro ~\\LN@P~<page> for each\n% page with line numbers on it. This macro calls four other\n% macros with one argument each. These macros are\n% dynamically defined to do tests and actions, to find out\n% on which page the current line number is located.\n%\n% We need sort of a pointer to the first page with line\n% numbers, initiallized to point to nothing:\n\n\\def\\LastNumberedPage{first} \n\\def\\LN@Pfirst{\\nextLN\\relax}\n\n% The four dynamic macros are initiallized to reproduce\n% themselves in an ~\\xdef~\n\n\\let\\lastLN\\relax % compare to last line on this page\n\\let\\firstLN\\relax % compare to first line on this page\n\\let\\pageLN\\relax % get the page number, compute the linenumber\n\\let\\nextLN\\relax % move to the next page\n\n% During the end-document run through the aux-files, we\n% disable ~\\@LN~. I may put in a check here later, to give\n% a rerun recommendation. \n\n\\AtEndDocument{\\let\\@LN\\@gobbletwo}\n\n% Now, this is the tricky part. First of all, the whole\n% definition of ~\\@LN~ is grouped, to avoid accumulation\n% on the save stack. Somehow ~\\csname~<cs>~\\endcsname~ pushes\n% an entry, which stays after an ~\\xdef~ to that <cs>.\n%\n% If ~\\LN@P~<page> is undefined, initialize it with the\n% current page and line number, with the\n% \\emph{pointer-to-the-next-page} pointing to nothing. And\n% the macro for the previous page will be redefined to point\n% to the current one. \n%\n% If the macro for the current page already exists, just\n% redefine the \\emph{last-line-number} entry.\n%\n% Finally, save the current page number, to get the pointer to the\n% following page later.\n\n\\def\\@LN#1#2{{\\expandafter\\@@LN\n \\csname LN@P#2C\\@LN@column\\expandafter\\endcsname\n \\csname LN@PO#2\\endcsname\n {#1}{#2}}}\n\n\\def\\@@LN#1#2#3#4{\\ifx#1\\relax\n \\ifx#2\\relax\\gdef#2{#3}\\fi\n \\expandafter\\@@@LN\\csname LN@P\\LastNumberedPage\\endcsname#1% \n \\xdef#1{\\lastLN{#3}\\firstLN{#3}% \n \\pageLN{#4}{\\@LN@column}{#2}\\nextLN\\relax}%\n \\else\n \\def\\lastLN##1{\\noexpand\\lastLN{#3}}%\n \\xdef#1{#1}%\n \\fi\n \\xdef\\LastNumberedPage{#4C\\@LN@column}}\n\n% The previous page macro gets its pointer to the\n% current one, replacing the ~\\relax~ with the cs-token\n% ~\\LN@P~<page>. \n\n\\def\\@@@LN#1#2{{\\def\\nextLN##1{\\noexpand\\nextLN\\noexpand#2}%\n \\xdef#1{#1}}}\n\n% Now, to print a line number, we need to find the page,\n% where it resides. This will most probably be the page where\n% the last one came from, or maybe the next page. However, it can\n% be a completely different one. We maintain a cache,\n% which is ~\\let~ to the last page's macro. But for now\n% it is initialized to expand ~\\LN@first~, where the poiner\n% to the first numbered page has been stored in. \n\n\\def\\NumberedPageCache{\\LN@Pfirst}\n\n% To find out on which page the current ~\\c@linenumber~ is, \n% we define the four dynamic macros to do something usefull\n% and execute the current cache macro. ~\\lastLN~ is run\n% first, testing if the line number in question may be on a\n% later page. If so, disable ~\\firstLN~, and go on to the\n% next page via ~\\nextLN~.\n\n\\def\\testLastNumberedPage#1{\\ifnum#1<\\c@linenumber\n \\let\\firstLN\\@gobble\n \\fi}\n\n% Else, if ~\\firstLN~ finds out that we need an earlier\n% page, we start over from the beginning. Else, ~\\nextLN~\n% will be disabled, and ~\\pageLN~ will run\n% ~\\gotNumberedPage~ with four arguments: the first line\n% number on this column, the page number, the column \n% number, and the first line on the page.\n\n\\def\\testFirstNumberedPage#1{\\ifnum#1>\\c@linenumber\n \\def\\nextLN##1{\\testNextNumberedPage\\LN@Pfirst}%\n \\else\n \\let\\nextLN\\@gobble\n \\def\\pageLN{\\gotNumberedPage{#1}}%\n \\fi}\n\n% We start with ~\\pageLN~ disabled and ~\\nextLN~ defined to\n% continue the search with the next page.\n\n\\long\\def \\@gobblethree #1#2#3{}\n\n\\def\\testNumberedPage{%\n \\let\\lastLN\\testLastNumberedPage\n \\let\\firstLN\\testFirstNumberedPage\n \\let\\pageLN\\@gobblethree\n \\let\\nextLN\\testNextNumberedPage\n \\NumberedPageCache\n }\n\n% When we switch to another page, we first have to make\n% sure that it is there. If we are done with the last \n% page, we probably need to run \\TeX\\ again, but for the\n% rest of this run, the cache macro will just return four\n% zeros. This saves a lot of time, for example if you have\n% half of an aux-file from an aborted run, in the next run\n% the whole page-list would be searched in vain again and\n% again for the second half of the document.\n%\n% If there is another page, we iterate the search. \n\n\\def\\testNextNumberedPage#1{\\ifx#1\\relax\n \\global\\def\\NumberedPageCache{\\gotNumberedPage0000}%\n \\PackageWarningNoLine{lineno}%\n {Linenumber reference failed,\n \\MessageBreak rerun to get it right}%\n \\else\n \\global\\let\\NumberedPageCache#1%\n \\fi\n \\testNumberedPage\n }\n\n% \\linelabel{demo2}\n% \\marginpar{\\tiny\\raggedright\n% Let's see if it finds the label\n% on page \\pageref{demo}, \n% line \\ref{demo}, and back here\n% on page \\pageref{demo2}, line\n% \\ref{demo2}. \n% \\unskip}%\n% To separate the official hooks from the internals there is\n% this equivalence, to hook in later for whatever purpose:\n\n\\let\\getLineNumber\\testNumberedPage\n\n% So, now we got the page where the number is on. We\n% establish if we are on an odd or even page, and calculate\n% the final line number to be printed.\n\n\\newif\\ifoddNumberedPage\n\\newif\\ifcolumnwiselinenumbers\n\\columnwiselinenumbersfalse\n\n\\def\\gotNumberedPage#1#2#3#4{\\oddNumberedPagefalse\n \\ifodd \\if@twocolumn #3\\else #2\\fi\\relax\\oddNumberedPagetrue\\fi\n \\advance\\c@linenumber\\@ne \n \\ifcolumnwiselinenumbers\n \\subtractlinenumberoffset{#1}%\n \\else\n \\subtractlinenumberoffset{#4}%\n \\fi\n }\n\n% You might want to run the pagewise mode with running line\n% numbers, or you might not. It's your choice:\n\n\\def\\runningpagewiselinenumbers{%\n \\let\\subtractlinenumberoffset\\@gobble\n }\n\n\\def\\realpagewiselinenumbers{%\n \\def\\subtractlinenumberoffset##1{\\advance\\c@linenumber-##1\\relax}%\n }\n\n\\realpagewiselinenumbers\n\n% For line number references, we need a protected call to\n% the whole procedure, with the requested line number stored\n% in the ~\\c@linenumber~ counter. This is what gets printed\n% to the aux-file to make a label:\n\n\\def\\thePagewiseLineNumber{\\protect \n \\getpagewiselinenumber{\\the\\c@linenumber}}%\n\n% And here is what happens when the label is refered to:\n\n\\def\\getpagewiselinenumber#1{{%\n \\c@linenumber #1\\relax\\testNumberedPage\n \\thelinenumber\n }}\n\n% %\n% A summary of all per line expenses:\n% \\begin{description}\\item\n% [CPU:] The ~\\output~ routine is called for each line,\n% and the page-search is done.\n% \\item\n% [DISK:] One line of output to the aux-file for each\n% numbered line\n% \\item\n% [MEM:] One macro per page. Great improvement over v1.02,\n% which had one control sequence per line in\n% addition. It blew the hash table after some five\n% thousand lines. \n% \\end{description}\n%\n% \\subsection{%\n% Twocolumn mode (New v3.06)\n% \\unskip}\n%\n% Twocolumn mode requires another patch to the ~\\output~ \n% routine, in order to print a column tag to the .aux \n% file.\n\n\\AtBeginDocument{% v4.2, revtex4.cls (e.g.). \n % <- TODO v4.4+: Or better in \\LineNoLaTeXOutput!? \n \\let\\@LN@orig@makecol\\@makecol} \n\\def\\@LN@makecol{%\n \\@LN@orig@makecol\n \\setbox\\@outputbox \\vbox{%\n \\boxmaxdepth \\@maxdepth\n \\protected@write\\@auxout{}{% \n \\string\\@LN@col{\\if@firstcolumn1\\else2\\fi}%\n }%\n \\box\\@outputbox \n }% \\vbox\n} %% TODO cf. revtexln.sty. \n\n\\def\\@LN@col{\\def\\@LN@column} % v4.22, removed #1. \n\\@LN@col{1}\n\n%\n% \\subsection{%\n% Numbering modulo $m$, starting at $f$ \n%% Numbering modulo 5\n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:Mod} \n% \n% Most users want to have only one in five lines numbered.\n% ~\\LineNumber~ is supposed to produce the outfit of the\n% line number attached to the line, while ~\\thelinenumber~\n% is used also for references, which should appear even if\n% they are not multiples of five. \n% \n% (New v4.00) Moreover, some users want to \n% control which line number should be printed first. Support \n% of this is now introduced here---see ~\\firstlinenumber~ \n% below.---~numline.sty~ by Michael Jaegermann and \n% James Fortune offers controlling which \\emph{final} \n% line numbers should not be printed. What is \n% it good for? We ignore this here until some user demands \n% it.---Peter Wilson's ~ledmac.sty~ offers much different \n% choices of line numbers to be printed, due to Wayne Sullivan. \n% (/New v4.00) \n% \n% (New v4.22) ~\\c@linenumbermodulo~ is rendered a \n% fake counter, as discussed since v4.00. So it can \n% no longer be set by ~\\setcounter~. ~\\modulolinenumbers~ \n% serves this purpose. Well, does anybody want to do \n% what worked with ~\\addtocounter~? (Then please tell \n% me.)---At least, ~\\value~ still works. For the same \n% purpose I rename the fake `firstlinenumber' counter \n% ~\\n@...~ to ~\\c@...~. (/New v4.22) \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% % \\newcount\\c@linenumbermodulo % removed for v4.22 \n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old}\n% \n%% Removed for v4.22: \n%% (UL) On my question why, e.g., \n%% ~\\chardef~ would not have sufficed, Stephan couldn't remember \n%% exactly; guessed that he wanted to offer \\LaTeX\\ counter \n%% facilities. However, the typical ones don't come this way. \n%% So I'm quite sure that I will change this next time. \n%% \n%% However, I observed at least two times that users gave a very \n%% high value to ~\\c@linenumbermodulo~ in order to suppress \n%% printing of the line number. One of these users preferred an \n%% own way of handling line numbers, just wanted to use \n%% ~\\linelabel~ and ~ednotes.sty~ features. Should we support this? \n%% I rather would like to advise them to \n%% ~\\let\\makeLineNumber\\relax~. (/UL) \n% \n% (New v4.00) \\par \n% ~\\themodulolinenumber~ waits for being declared \n% ~\\LineNumber~ by ~\\modulolinenumbers~. (This has \n% been so before, no change.) Here is how it \n% looked before: \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% % \\def\\themodulolinenumber{{\\@tempcnta\\c@linenumber\n% % \\divide\\@tempcnta\\c@linenumbermodulo\n% % \\multiply\\@tempcnta\\c@linenumbermodulo\n% % \\ifnum\\@tempcnta=\\c@linenumber\\thelinenumber\\fi\n% % }}\n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old} \n% (UL) This was somewhat slow. This arithmetic \n% happens at every line. This time I tend to declare an extra \n%% TODO v4.4+ \n% line counter (as opposed to my usual recommendations to use \n% counters as rarely as possible) which is stepped every line. \n% It could be incremented in the same way as ~\\c@LN@truepage~ \n% is incremented via ~\\cl@page~! This is another point in favour \n% of ~{linenumber}~ being a \\LaTeX\\ counter! \n% When this new counter equals ~\\c@linenumbermodulo~, it is reset, \n% and ~\\thelinenumber~ is executed.---It gets much slower by my \n% support of controlling the first line number below. I should \n% improve this.---On\n%% %% TODO v4.4+--pagewise!? \n% the other hand, time expense means very little nowadays, \n% while the number of \\TeX\\ counters still is limited. \n% \n% For the same purpose, moreover, attaching the line number \n% box could be intercepted earlier (in ~\\MakeLineNo~), \n% without changing ~\\LineNumber~. However, this may be \n% bad for the latter's announcement as a wizard interface \n% in section_\\ref{s:UserCmds}.\n%% \n%% I wonder about Stephan's group. Its only effect is that \n%% ~\\@tempcnta~ is restored after using it. What for is this? \n%% I tend to remove the group braces. %% TODO v4.4+\n% (/UL) \n% \n% Here is the new code. It is very near to my ~lnopatch.sty~ \n% code which introduced the first line number feature \n% before.---I add starting with a ~\\relax~ which is so often \n% recommended---without understanding this really. At least, \n% it will not harm.---Former group braces appear as \n% ~\\begingroup~/~\\endgroup~ here. \n\n\\def\\themodulolinenumber{\\relax\n \\ifnum\\c@linenumber<\\c@firstlinenumber \\else \n \\begingroup \n \\@tempcnta\\c@linenumber\n \\advance\\@tempcnta-\\c@firstlinenumber \n \\divide\\@tempcnta\\c@linenumbermodulo\n \\multiply\\@tempcnta\\c@linenumbermodulo\n \\advance\\@tempcnta\\c@firstlinenumber \n \\ifnum\\@tempcnta=\\c@linenumber \\thelinenumber \\fi\n \\endgroup \n \\fi \n}\n\n% (/New v4.00) \n% \n% The user command to set the modulo counter:\n% (New v4.31) \\dots\\ a star variant is introduced to implement \n% Hillel Chayim Yisraeli's idea to print the first line number \n% after an interruption of the edited text by some editor's \n% text, regardless of the modulo. If it is 1, it is printed only \n% with ~\\firstlinenumber{1}~. I.e., you use ~\\modulolinenumbers*~\n% for the new feature, without the star you get the simpler \n% behaviour that we have had so far. And you can switch back \n% from the refined behaviour to the simple one by using \n% ~\\modulolinenumbers~ without the star.---This enhancement \n% is accompanied by a new package option ~modulo*~ which just \n% executes ~\\modulolinenumbers*~ \n% (subsection_\\ref{ss:v3opts}).---`With ~\\firstlinenumber{1}~' \n% exactly means: `1' is printed if and only if the last \n% ~\\firstlinenumber~ before or in the paragraph that follows \n% the ``interruption'' has argument `1' (or something \n% \\emph{expanding} to `1', or (to) something that \\TeX\\ \n% ``reads'' as 1, e.g.: a \\TeX\\ count register storing \n% 1).---At present, this behaviour may be unsatisfactory with \n% pagewise line-numbering $\\dots$ I'll make an experimental \n% extra package if someone complains \\dots\n\n\\newcommand\\modulolinenumbers{% \n \\@ifstar\n {\\def\\@LN@maybe@moduloresume{% \n \\global\\let\\@LN@maybe@normalLineNumber\n \\@LN@normalLineNumber}% \n \\@LN@modulolinenos}% \n {\\let\\@LN@maybe@moduloresume\\relax \\@LN@modulolinenos}%\n}\n\n\\global\\let\\@LN@maybe@normalLineNumber\\relax \n\\let\\@LN@maybe@moduloresume\\relax \n\\gdef\\@LN@normalLineNumber{% \n \\ifnum\\c@linenumber=\\c@firstlinenumber \\else \n \\ifnum\\c@linenumber>\\@ne\n \\def\\LineNumber{\\thelinenumber}% \n \\fi \n \\fi \n%%\n% ~\\def~ instead of ~\\let~ enables taking account of a \n% redefinition of ~\\thelinenumber~ in a present numbering \n% environment (e.g.). \n%%\n \\global\\let\\@LN@maybe@normalLineNumber\\relax}\n\n% Instead of changing ~\\LineNumber~ directly by \n% ~LN@moduloresume~, these tricks enable ~\\modulolinenumbers*~\n% to act as locally as I can make it. I don't know how to \n% avoid that the output routine switches back to the normal \n% modulo behaviour by a global change. (An ~\\aftergroup~ may \n% fail in admittedly improbable cases.)\n\n\\newcommand*\\@LN@modulolinenos[1][\\z@]{%\n%% \n% The definition of this macro is that of the former \n% ~\\modulolinenumbers~. (/New v4.31) \n%%\n \\let\\LineNumber\\themodulolinenumber\n \\ifnum#1>\\@ne \n \\chardef % v4.22, note below \n \\c@linenumbermodulo#1\\relax\n \\else\\ifnum#1=\\@ne \n% \\begin{old}\\begin{verbatim}\n% % \\def\\LineNumber{\\thelinenumber}%\n% \\end{verbatim}\n% \\end{old} \n% (New v4.00) I am putting something here to enable \n% ~\\firstlinenumber~ with $~\\c@linenumbermodulo~=1$. \n% With ~lnopatch.sty~, a trick was offered for this purpose. \n% It is now obsolete. \n% \n \\def\\LineNumber{\\@LN@ifgreat\\thelinenumber}% \n%% \n% (/New v4.00) \n%% \n \\fi\\fi\n }\n\n% (New v4.00) The default of ~\\@LN@ifgreat~ is \n\n\\let\\@LN@ifgreat\\relax\n\n% The previous changes as soon as ~\\firstlinenumber~ is used: \n\n\\newcommand*\\firstlinenumber[1]{% \n \\chardef\\c@firstlinenumber#1\\relax \n%% \n% No counter, little values allowed only---OK?---(UL) \n% The change is local---OK? The good thing is that \n% ~\\global\\firstlinenumber{~<number>~}~ works. Moreover, \n% ~\\modulolinenumbers~ acts locally as well. (/UL)\n%\n% (New v4.31) \n%% \n \\let\\@LN@ifgreat\\@LN@ifgreat@critical} \n\n\\def\\@LN@ifgreat@critical{%\n \\ifnum\\c@linenumber<\\c@firstlinenumber \n \\expandafter \\@gobble \n \\fi}% \n\n% (/New v4.31) \n% \n% The default \n% value of ~\\c@firstlinenumber~ %% v4.31 \n% is 0. This is best for what one would expect from modulo \n% printing. \n\n\\let\\c@firstlinenumber=\\z@\n\n% \n% For usage and effects of ~\\modulolinenumbers~ and %% v4.31 \n% ~\\firstlinenumbers~, please consult section_\\ref{s:UserCmds}. \n% Two details on ~\\firstlinenumbers~ here: \n% (i)_~\\firstlinenumber~ acts on a paragraph if and only if \n% (a)_the paragraph is broken into lines ``in line-numbering \n% mode'' (after ~\\linenumbers~, e.g.); \n% (b)_it is the last occurrence of a ~\\firstlinenumbers~ \n% before or in the paragraph. \n% (The practical applications of this that I can imagine \n% don't seem appealing to me.) \n% Cf._the explanation above of how ~\\modulolinenumbers~ and \n% ~\\firstlinenumbers~ interact---for this and for (ii), \n% which is concerned with possible arguments for \n% ~\\firstlinenumbers~. \n% \n% Note that the line numbers of the present section \n% demonstrate the two devices. (/New v4.00) \n\n%%\\setcounter{linenumbermodulo}{5}\n\\chardef\\c@linenumbermodulo=5 % v4.2; ugly? \n\\modulolinenumbers[1]\n\n% (New v4.22) The new implementation through ~\\chardef~ \n% decreases the functionality and raises certain compatibility \n% problems. I face this without fear. The maximum modulo value \n% is now ~255~. I expect that this suffices for usual applications. \n% However, some users have ``abused'' ~lineno.sty~ to get \n% ~ednotes.sty~ features without line numbers, so have set the \n% modulo to a value beyond the total number of lines in their \n% edition. This ought to be replaced by \n% ~\\let\\makeLineNumber\\relax~. (/New v4.22) \n% \n% \\section{% \n% Package options\n% \\unskip}\\label{s:Opts} \n% \n% (New v4.1) \n% The last heading formerly was the heading of what is now \n% subsection_\\ref{ss:v3opts}. The options declared there were \n% said to execute user commands only. This was wrong already \n% concerning ~displaymath~ and ~hyperref~. At least, however, \n% these options were no or almost no occasion to skip definitions \n% or allocations. This is different with the options that we now \n% insert. \n% \n%% (New v4.2) v4.00 moved the ``options'' below the \n%% ``extensions''. This was bad with ~\\do@mlineno~ in \n%% subsection_\\ref{ss:v3opts} which is to control \n%% subsection_\\ref{ss:display}---undone here. (/New v4.2) \n%\n% \\subsection{%\n% Extended referencing to line numbers. (v4.2)\n% \\unskip}\n% This subsection explains and declares package option ~addpageno~. %% v4.31\n% \n% If a line to whose number you refer by ~\\ref~ is not on the \n% present page, it may be useful to add the number of the page \n% on which the line occurs---and perhaps it should not be added \n% otherwise. In general, you could use the Standard \\LaTeX\\ \n% package varioref for this. However, the latter usually \n% produces verbose output like `on the preceding page'---\n% unless costumized---, while in critical editions, e.g., one \n% may prefer just adding the page number and some mark on the \n% left of the line number, irrespectively of how far the page is \n% apart etc. To support this, package option ~addpageno~ \n% provides a command ~\\vpagelineref~ to be used in place of \n% ~\\ref~. This produces, e.g., `34.15' when referring to line_15 \n% on page_34 while the present page is not 34. You can customize \n% the outcome, see the package file ~vplref.sty~ where the code \n% and further details are. You may conceive of \n% ~\\vpagelineref~ as a certain customization of varioref's \n% ~\\vref~. \n% \n% This implies that option ~addpageno~ requires the files \n% ~vplref.sty~ and ~varioref.sty~. ~addpageno~ automatically \n% loads both of them. Yet you can also load ~varioref.sty~ \n% on your own to use its package options. \n% \n% Of course, you might better introduce a shorter command name \n% for ~\\vpagelineref~ for your work, while we cannot predict \n% here what shorthand will fit your work. E.g., \n% ~\\newcommand{\\lref}{\\vpagelineref}~.\n% \n% If you really want to add the page number in \\emph{any} case, \n% use, e.g., some ~\\myref~ instead of ~\\ref~, after \n% \\[~newcommand*{\\myref}{\\pageref{#1}.\\ref{#1}}~\\] \n% or what you like. You don't need the ~addpageno~ option in \n% this case. \n% \n% ~addpageno~ is due to a suggestion by Sergei Mariev. \n\n\\DeclareOption{addpageno}{% \n \\AtEndOfPackage{\\RequirePackage{vplref}[2005/04/25]}} \n\n% \\subsection{% \n% \\scs{linelabel} in math mode \n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:MathRef}\n% \n% We have made some first steps towards allowing ~\\linelabel~ in \n% math mode. Because our code for this is presently experimental, \n% we leave it to the user to decide for the experiment by calling \n% option ~mathrefs~. We are in a hurry now and thus leave the \n% code, explanations, and discussion in the separate package \n% ~ednmath0.sty~. Maybe we later find the time to improve the \n% code and move the relevant content of ~ednmath0.sty~ to here. \n% The optimal situation would be to define ~\\linelabel~ from \n% the start so it works in math mode, omitting the ~mathrefs~ \n% option. \n% \n% Actually, this package even provides adjustments for analogously \n% allowing ~ednotes.sty~ commands in math mode. Loading the package \n% is postponed to ~\\AtBeginDocument~ when we know whether these \n% adjustments are needed. \n\n\\DeclareOption{mathrefs}{\\AtBeginDocument \n {\\RequirePackage{ednmath0}[2004/08/20]}} \n\n% \n% \\subsection{% \n% Arrays, tabular environments (Revised v4.11)\n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:Tab} \n% \n% This subsection explains and declares package options %% v4.31\n% ~edtable~, ~longtable~, and ~nolongtablepatch~.\n%\n% The standard \\LaTeX\\ tabular environments come as single \n% boxes, so the ~lineno.sty~ versions before v4.00 treated them as \n% (parts of) single lines, printing (at most) one line number \n% beside each and stepping the line number counter once only. \n% Moreover, ~\\linelabel~s got lost. Of course, tables are \n% usually so high that you will want to treat each row like a \n% line. (Christian Tapp even desires that the lines of table \n% entries belonging to a single row are treated like ordinary \n% lines.) Footnotes get lost in such environments as well, which \n% was bad for ~ednotes.sty~.\n% \n% We provide adjustments to count lines, print their numbers \n% etc.\\ as desired at least for \\emph{some} \\LaTeX\\ tabular \n% environments. (Like with other details, ``some'' is to some \n% extent explained in ~edtable.sty~.) We do this similarly as \n% with option ~mathrefs~ before. We leave code \n% and explanations in the separate package ~edtable.sty~. \n% (For wizards: this package provides adjustments for \n% ~ednotes.sty~ as well. However, in the present case we don't try \n% to avoid them unless ~ednotes.sty~ is loaded.) \n% Package option ~edtable~ \n% defines---by loading ~edtable.sty~---an environment ~{edtable}~ \n% which is able to change some \\LaTeX\\ tabular environments \n% with the desired effects. (v4.11: ~edtable.sty~ v1.3 counts \n% \\LaTeX's ~{array}~ [etc.\\@] as a ``tabular environment'' as \n% well.) \n% \n% The ~{edtable}~ environment doesn't help with ~longtable.sty~, \n% however. To make up for this, ~{longtable}~ is adjusted in a \n% different way---and this happens only when another ~lineno.sty~ \n% option ~longtable~ is called. In this case, option ~edtable~ \n% needn't be called explicitly: option ~longtable~ works as if \n% ~edtable~ had been called. \n% \n% Now, we are convinced that vertical spacing around \n% ~{longtable}~ works wrongly---see \\LaTeX\\ bugs database \n% tools/3180 and 3485, or see explanations in the package \n% ~ltabptch.sty~ (which is to be obtained from CTAN folder\n% \\path{macros/latex/ltabptch}). Our conviction is so strong\n% that the ~longtable~ option loads---after ~longtable.sty~---the\n% patch package ~ltabptch.sty~. If the user doesn't want this\n% (maybe preferring her own arrangement with the vertical \n% spacing), she can forbid it by calling ~nolongtablepatch~. \n% \n% The following code just collects some choices, which are \n% then executed in section_\\ref{ss:ExOpt}. We use an ~\\if...~ \n% without ~\\newif~ since ~\\if...true~ and ~\\if...false~ \n% would occur at most two times and only within the present \n% package. (~\\AtEndOfClass{\\RequirePackage{edtable}}~ \n% could be used instead, I just overlooked this. Now I don't \n% change it because it allows to change the version requirement \n% at one place only.)\n\n\\let\\if@LN@edtable\\iffalse \n\n\\DeclareOption{edtable}{\\let\\if@LN@edtable\\iftrue}\n\n\\DeclareOption{longtable}{\\let\\if@LN@edtable\\iftrue \n \\PassOptionsToPackage{longtable}{edtable}}\n\n\\DeclareOption{nolongtablepatch}{% \n \\PassOptionsToPackage{nolongtablepatch}{edtable}}\n\n% (/New v4.1) \n% \n% \\subsection{% \n% Switch among settings \n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:v3opts}\n% \n% There is a bunch of package options that execute %% v4.2 \n%% There is a bunch of package options, all of them executing \n%% executing only user commands (see below). %% Cf. start of section. \n% user commands only. \n%\n% Options ~left~ (~right~) put the line numbers on the left\n% (right) margin. This works in all modes. ~left~ is the\n% default.\n\n\\DeclareOption{left}{\\leftlinenumbers*}\n\n\\DeclareOption{right}{\\rightlinenumbers*}\n\n% Option ~switch~ (~switch*~) puts the line numbers on the\n% outer (inner) margin of the text. This requires running\n% the pagewise mode, but we turn off the page offset\n% subtraction, getting sort of running numbers again. The\n% ~pagewise~ option may restore true pagewise mode later.\n\n\\DeclareOption{switch}{\\setpagewiselinenumbers\n \\switchlinenumbers\n \\runningpagewiselinenumbers}\n\n\\DeclareOption{switch*}{\\setpagewiselinenumbers\n \\switchlinenumbers*%\n \\runningpagewiselinenumbers}\n\n% In twocolumn mode, we can switch the line numbers to \n% the outer margin, and/or start with number 1 in each\n% column. Margin switching is covered by the ~switch~ \n% options.\n\n\\DeclareOption{columnwise}{\\setpagewiselinenumbers\n \\columnwiselinenumberstrue\n \\realpagewiselinenumbers}\n\n% The options ~pagewise~ and ~running~ select the major\n% linenumber mechanism. ~running~ line numbers refer to a real\n% counter value, which can be reset for any paragraph,\n% even getting multiple paragraphs on one page starting\n% with line number one. ~pagewise~ line numbers get a\n% unique hidden number within the document, but with the\n% opportunity to establish the page on which they finally\n% come to rest. This allows the subtraction of the page\n% offset, getting the numbers starting with 1 on top of each\n% page, and margin switching in twoside formats becomes\n% possible. The default mode is ~running~. \n%\n% The order of declaration of the options is important here\n% ~pagewise~ must come after ~switch~, to overide running\n% pagewise mode. ~running~ comes last, to reset the running\n% line number mode, e.g, after selecting margin switch mode\n% for ~pagewise~ running. Once more, if you specify all\n% three of the options ~[switch,pagewise,running]~, the\n% result is almost nothing, but if you later say\n% ~\\pagewiselinenumbers~, you get margin switching, with\n% real pagewise line numbers.\n%\n\\DeclareOption{pagewise}{\\setpagewiselinenumbers\n \\realpagewiselinenumbers}\n\n\\DeclareOption{running}{\\relax}\n\n% The option ~modulo~ causes only those linenumbers to be\n% printed which are multiples of five. \n\n\\DeclareOption{modulo}{\\modulolinenumbers\\relax}\n\n% Option ~modulo*~ modifies ~modulo~ in working like \n% ~\\modulolinenumbers*~---see section_\\ref{s:UserCmds}. \n\n\\DeclareOption{modulo*}{\\modulolinenumbers*\\relax}\n\n% The package option ~mathlines~ switches the behavior of\n% the ~{linenomath}~ environment with its star-form.\n% Without this option, the ~{linenomath}~ environment does\n% not number the lines of the display, while the star-form\n% does. With this option, its just the opposite.\n%\n%%% 1999-06-10: renamed ~displaymath~ to ~mathlines~.\n\n\\DeclareOption{mathlines}{\\linenumberdisplaymath}\n\n% ~displaymath~ now calls for wrappers of the standard \n% \\LaTeX\\ display math environment. This was previously \n% done by ~mlineno.sty~.\n% \n% (New v4.3) Option `displaymath' becomes default according \n% to Erik \\mbox{Luijten}'s suggestion. I was finally convinced \n% of this as soon as I discovered how to avoid a spurious line \n% number above ~\\begin{linenomath}~ (subsection_\\ref{ss:DM}). \n% ~\\endlinenomath~ provides ~\\ignorespaces~, so what could go \n% wrong now? \n\n\\DeclareOption{displaymath}{\\PackageWarningNoLine{lineno}{%\n Option [displaymath] is obsolete -- default now!}} \n%% \n%%\\let\\do@mlineno\\relax\n%%\\DeclareOption{displaymath}{\\let\\do@mlineno\\@empty}\n% (/New v4.3) \n% \n% \\subsection{%\n% Compatibility with \\texttt{hyperref} %% own subsec. v4.3. \n% \\unskip}\n% The ~hyperref~ package, via ~nameref~, requires three more \n% groups in the second argment of a ~\\newlabel~. Well, why \n% shouldn't it get them? (New v3.07) The presence of the\n% ~nameref~ package is now detected automatically\n% ~\\AtBeginDocument~. (/New v3.07) (Fixed in v3.09) We try\n% to be smart, and test ~\\AtBeginDocument~ if the ~nameref~\n% package is loaded, but ~hyperref~ postpones the loading of\n% ~nameref~ too, so this is all in vain.\n% \n% (New v4.3) But we can also test at the first ~\\linelabel~. \n% Regarding the error-message for misplaced ~\\linelabel~ from v4.11: \n% previously, ~\\linenumbers~ rendered ~\\linelabel~ the genuine \n% version of ~\\linelabel~ from the start on. This doesn't work \n% now, since ~\\@LN@linelabel~ may change its meaning after the \n% first ~\\linenumbers~ and before a next one (if there is some). \n% (/New v4.3) \n\n\\DeclareOption{hyperref}{\\PackageWarningNoLine{lineno}{%\n Option [hyperref] is obsolete. \n \\MessageBreak The hyperref package is detected automatically.}}\n\n\\AtBeginDocument{% \n \\@ifpackageloaded{nameref}{%\n%% \n% (New v4.3) ``Global'' is merely ``symbolic'' ~\\AtBeginDoc...~. \n% If ~nameref~ is not detected here, the next ~\\@LN@linelabel~ \n% will do almost the same, then globally indeed. \n%%\n \\gdef\\@LN@ExtraLabelItems{{}{}{}}% \n }{%\n \\global\\let\\@LN@@linelabel\\@LN@linelabel \n \\gdef\\@LN@linelabel{% \n%% \n% ~\\@ifpackageloaded~ is ``preamble only'', its---very \n% internal---preamble definition is replicated here: \n%%\n \\expandafter \n \\ifx\\csname ver@nameref.sty\\endcsname\\relax \\else \n \\gdef\\@LN@ExtraLabelItems{{}{}{}}% \n \\fi \n%% \n% Now aim at the ``usual'' behaviour: \n%% \n \\global\\let\\@LN@linelabel\\@LN@@linelabel \n \\global\\let\\@LN@@linelabel\\relax \n \\@LN@linelabel\n }% \n }%\n} \n\n% (/New v4.3) \n% \n% (New v4.1) \n% \\subsection{% \n% A note on calling so many options \n% \\unskip} \n% \n% The number of package options may stimulate worrying about how to \n% \\emph{enter} all the options that one would like to use---they may \n% not fit into one line. Fortunately, you can safely break code lines \n% after the commas separating the option names in the ~\\usepackage~\n% command (no comment marks needed). \n% \n% \\subsection{% \n% Execute options\n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:ExOpt}\n% \n% We stop declaring options and execute the ones that are \n% called by the user. (/New v4.1)\n\n\\ProcessOptions\n\n% (New v4.1) Now we know whether ~edtable.sty~ is wanted \n% and (if it is) with which options it is to be called. \n\n\\if@LN@edtable \\RequirePackage{edtable}[2005/03/07] \\fi \n\n% (/New v4.1) \n% \n% \\section{%\n% Former package extensions \n% \\label{s:Xt}\\unskip}\n%\n% The extensions in this section were previously supplied \n% in separate ~.sty~ files. \n%\n% \\subsection{%\n% $display math$\n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:display}\n%% (New v4.32) \n% (New v4.3) From now on, you no longer need to type \n% the ~{linenomath}~ environment with the ~\\[~, ~{equation}~, \n% and ~{eqnarray}~ environments---and you no longer need to \n% use the former package option ~displaymath~ for this feature. \n% (/New v4.3) \n%% (/New v4.32) \n% \n% The standard \\LaTeX\\ display math environments are\n% wrapped in a ~{linenomath}~ environment.\n%\n% (New 3.05) The ~[fleqn]~ option of the standard\n% \\LaTeX\\ classes defines the display math\n% environments such that line numbers appear just\n% fine. Thus, we need not do any tricks when\n% ~[fleqn]~ is loaded, as indicated by presents of\n% the ~\\mathindent~ register. (/New 3.05)\n%\n% (New 3.05a) for ~{eqnarray}~s we rather keep the\n% old trick. (/New 3.05a)\n%\n% (New 3.08) Wrap ~\\[~ and ~\\]~ into ~{linenomath}~, \n% instead of ~{displaymath}~. Also save the definition\n% of ~\\equation~, instead of replicating the current \n% \\LaTeX\\ definition. (/New 3.08)\n\n%%\\ifx\\do@mlineno\\@empty\n \\@ifundefined{mathindent}{\n\n%% \\AtBeginDocument{% \n \\let\\LN@displaymath\\[%\n \\let\\LN@enddisplaymath\\]%\n \\renewcommand\\[{\\begin{linenomath}\\LN@displaymath}%\n \\renewcommand\\]{\\LN@enddisplaymath\\end{linenomath}}%\n% \n \\let\\LN@equation\\equation\n \\let\\LN@endequation\\endequation\n \\renewenvironment{equation}%\n {\\linenomath\\LN@equation}%\n {\\LN@endequation\\endlinenomath}%\n%% }\n\n }{}% \\@ifundefined{mathindent} -- 3rd arg v4.2, was \\par! \n\n%%\\AtBeginDocument{%\n \\let\\LN@eqnarray\\eqnarray\n \\let\\LN@endeqnarray\\endeqnarray\n \\renewenvironment{eqnarray}%\n {\\linenomath\\LN@eqnarray}%\n {\\LN@endeqnarray\\endlinenomath}%\n%%}\n \n%%\\fi\n\n% (UL) Indeed. The \\LaTeX\\ macros are saved for \n% unnumbered mode, which is detected by ~\\linenomath~. \n% (/UL) \n%\n% \\subsection{%\n% Line numbers in internal vertical mode\n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:ILN}\n%\n% The command ~\\internallinenumbers~ adds line numbers in \n% internal vertical mode, but with limitations: we assume\n% fixed baseline skip.\n%\n% (v4.22) v3.10 provided a global (~\\global\\advance~) \n% as well as a local version (star-form, using \n% ~\\c@internallinenumber~). ~\\resetlinenumbers~ acted \n% locally and was here used with the global version---save \n% stack danger, \\TeX book p._301---in v4.00 I \n% disabled the global version therefore. Now I find that \n% it is better to keep a global version, and the now global \n% ~\\resetlinenumbers~ is perfect for this. The global version \n% allows continuing the ``internal'' numbers in the ensuing \n% ``external'' text, and---unless reset by brackets \n% argument---continuing the above series of line numbers. \n% As with v3.10, the local version always starts with \n% line number one. A new ~\\@LN@iglobal~ steps ~\\global~ly \n% in the global version, otherwise it is ~\\relax~. \n% (I also remove all my stupid discussions as of v4.00. \n% And I use ~\\newcommand~.) (v4.22)\n\n\\let\\@LN@iglobal\\global % v4.22 \n\n\\newcommand\\internallinenumbers{\\setrunninglinenumbers \n \\let\\@@par\\internallinenumberpar\n \\ifx\\@par\\@@@par\\let\\@par\\internallinenumberpar\\fi\n \\ifx\\par\\@@@par\\let\\par\\internallinenumberpar\\fi\n \\ifx\\@par\\linenumberpar\\let\\@par\\internallinenumberpar\\fi\n \\ifx\\par\\linenumberpar\\let\\par\\internallinenumberpar\\fi\n \\@ifnextchar[{\\resetlinenumber}%]\n {\\@ifstar{\\let\\c@linenumber\\c@internallinenumber\n \\let\\@LN@iglobal\\relax % v4.22\n \\c@linenumber\\@ne}{}}%\n }\n\n\\let\\endinternallinenumbers\\endlinenumbers\n\\@namedef{internallinenumbers*}{\\internallinenumbers*}\n\\expandafter\\let\\csname endinternallinenumbers*\\endcsname\\endlinenumbers\n\n\\newcount\\c@internallinenumber\n\\newcount\\c@internallinenumbers\n\n\\newcommand\\internallinenumberpar{% \n \\ifvmode\\@@@par\\else\\ifinner\\@@@par\\else\\@@@par\n \\begingroup\n \\c@internallinenumbers\\prevgraf\n \\setbox\\@tempboxa\\hbox{\\vbox{\\makeinternalLinenumbers}}%\n \\dp\\@tempboxa\\prevdepth\n \\ht\\@tempboxa\\z@\n \\nobreak\\vskip-\\prevdepth\n \\nointerlineskip\\box\\@tempboxa\n \\endgroup \n \\fi\\fi\n }\n\n\\newcommand\\makeinternalLinenumbers{% \n \\ifnum\\c@internallinenumbers>\\z@ % v4.2\n \\hb@xt@\\z@{\\makeLineNumber}% \n \\@LN@iglobal % v4.22 \n \\advance\\c@linenumber\\@ne\n \\advance\\c@internallinenumbers\\m@ne\n \\expandafter\\makeinternalLinenumbers\\fi\n }\n % TODO v4.4+: star: line numbers right!? cf. lnocapt.sty\n\n% \n% \\subsection{%\n% Line number references with offset\n% \\unskip}\n%\n% This extension defines macros to refer to line\n% numbers with an offset, e.g., to refer to a line\n% which cannot be labeled directly (display math).\n% This was formerly knows as ~rlineno.sty~.\n%\n% To refer to a pagewise line number with offset:\n% \\begin{quote}\n% ~\\linerefp[~<OFFSET>~]{~<LABEL>~}~\n% \\end{quote}\n% To refer to a running line number with offset:\n% \\begin{quote}\n% ~\\linerefr[~<OFFSET>~]{~<LABEL>~}~\n% \\end{quote}\n% To refer to a line number labeled in the same mode as currently\n% selected:\n% \\begin{quote}\n% ~\\lineref[~<OFFSET>~]{~<LABEL>~}~\n% \\end{quote}\n\n\\newcommand\\lineref{%\n \\ifx\\c@linenumber\\c@runninglinenumber\n \\expandafter\\linerefr\n \\else\n \\expandafter\\linerefp\n \\fi\n}\n\n\\newcommand*\\linerefp[2][\\z@]{{%\n \\let\\@thelinenumber\\thelinenumber\n \\edef\\thelinenumber{\\advance\\c@linenumber#1\\relax\n \\noexpand\\@thelinenumber}%\n \\ref{#2}%\n}}\n\n% This goes deep into \\LaTeX's internals.\n\n\\newcommand*\\linerefr[2][\\z@]{{%\n \\def\\@@linerefadd{\\advance\\c@linenumber#1}%\n \\expandafter\\@setref\\csname r@#2\\endcsname\n \\@linerefadd{#2}%\n}}\n\n\\newcommand*\\@linerefadd[2]{\\c@linenumber=#1\\@@linerefadd\\relax\n \\thelinenumber}\n\n%% TODO v4.4+: Insert `LN' in internal command names? \n% \n% \\subsection{%\n% Numbered quotation environments\n% \\unskip}\n%\n% The ~{numquote}~ and ~{numquotation}~\n% environments are like ~{quote}~ and\n% ~{quotation}~, except there will be line\n% numbers. \n% \n% An optional argument gives the number to count\n% from. A star ~*~ (inside or outside the closing\n% ~}~) prevent the reset of the line numbers.\n% Default is to count from one.\n% \n% (v4.22: A local version using ~\\c@internallinenumber~ \n% might be useful, see subsection_\\ref{ss:ILN}.) %% TODO v4.4+\n\n\\newcommand\\quotelinenumbers\n {\\@ifstar\\linenumbers{\\@ifnextchar[\\linenumbers{\\linenumbers*}}}\n\n\\newdimen\\quotelinenumbersep\n\\quotelinenumbersep=\\linenumbersep\n\\let\\quotelinenumberfont\\linenumberfont\n\n\\newcommand\\numquotelist\n {\\leftlinenumbers\n \\linenumbersep\\quotelinenumbersep\n \\let\\linenumberfont\\quotelinenumberfont\n \\addtolength{\\linenumbersep}{-\\@totalleftmargin}%\n \\quotelinenumbers\n }\n\n\\newenvironment{numquote} {\\quote\\numquotelist}{\\endquote}\n\\newenvironment{numquotation} {\\quotation\\numquotelist}{\\endquotation}\n\\newenvironment{numquote*} {\\quote\\numquotelist*}{\\endquote}\n\\newenvironment{numquotation*}{\\quotation\\numquotelist*}{\\endquotation}\n\n% \n% \\subsection{%\n% Frame around a paragraph\n% \\unskip}\n%\n% The ~{bframe}~ environment draws a frame around\n% some text, across page breaks, if necessary.\n%\n% This works only for plain text paragraphs,\n% without special height lines. All lines must be\n% ~\\baselineskip~ apart, no display math.\n\n\\newenvironment{bframe}\n {\\par\n \\@tempdima\\textwidth\n \\advance\\@tempdima 2\\bframesep\n \\setbox\\bframebox\\hb@xt@\\textwidth{%\n \\hskip-\\bframesep\n \\vrule\\@width\\bframerule\\@height\\baselineskip\\@depth\\bframesep\n \\advance\\@tempdima-2\\bframerule\n \\hskip\\@tempdima\n \\vrule\\@width\\bframerule\\@height\\baselineskip\\@depth\\bframesep\n \\hskip-\\bframesep\n }%\n \\hbox{\\hskip-\\bframesep\n \\vrule\\@width\\@tempdima\\@height\\bframerule\\@depth\\z@}%\n \\nointerlineskip\n \\copy\\bframebox\n \\nobreak\n \\kern-\\baselineskip\n \\runninglinenumbers\n \\def\\makeLineNumber{\\copy\\bframebox\\hss}%\n }\n {\\par\n \\kern-\\prevdepth\n \\kern\\bframesep\n \\nointerlineskip\n \\@tempdima\\textwidth\n \\advance\\@tempdima 2\\bframesep\n \\hbox{\\hskip-\\bframesep\n \\vrule\\@width\\@tempdima\\@height\\bframerule\\@depth\\z@}%\n }\n\n\\newdimen\\bframerule\n\\bframerule=\\fboxrule\n\n\\newdimen\\bframesep\n\\bframesep=\\fboxsep\n\n\\newbox\\bframebox\n \n% \n% \n% \\section{%\n% Move \\scs{vadjust} items (New v4.00)\n% \\unskip}\\label{s:MVadj} \n% \n% This section completes reviving ~\\pagebreak~, ~\\nopagebreak~, \n% ~\\vspace~, and the star and optional form of ~\\\\~. This was \n% started in section_\\ref{ss:output} and resumed in \n% section_\\ref{ss:MLN} and subsection_\\ref{ss:calls}.\n% The problem was explained in section_\\ref{ss:output}: \n% ~\\vadjust~ items come out at a bad position, and the \n% \\LaTeX\\ commands named before work with ~\\vadjust~ indeed. \n% Our solution was sketched there as well. \n% \n% According to the caveat in subsection_\\ref{ss:OnOff} concerning\n% ~\\ifLineNumbers~, the \\LaTeX\\ commands enumerated may go \n% wrong if you switch line numbering inside or at the end of \n% a paragraph. \n%% %% TODO v4.4+\n% \n% \\subsection{%\n% Redefining \\scs{vadjust}\n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:PVadj}\n% \n% ~\\vadjust~ will temporarily be changed into the following \n% command. \n\n\\def\\PostponeVadjust#1{% \n \\global\\let\\vadjust\\@LN@@vadjust \n%% \n% This undoes a ~\\global\\let\\vadjust\\PostponeVadjust~ which will \n% start each of the refined \\LaTeX\\ commands. The ~\\global~s \n% are most probably superfluous. They might be useful should one \n% ~\\vadjust~ appear in a group starting after the change of \n% ~\\vadjust~ into ~\\PostponeVadjust~. \n% (UL) Even the undoing may be superfluous, cf._discussion \n% in section_\\ref{ss:ReDef} below. (UL) \n%% \n \\vadjust{\\penalty-\\@Mppvacodepen}% \n \\g@addto@macro\\@LN@vadjustlist{#1\\@lt}% \n}\n\\let\\@LN@@vadjust\\vadjust \n\\global\\let\\@LN@vadjustlist\\@empty \n\\global\\let\\@LN@do@vadjusts\\relax \n\n% These ~\\global~s are just to remind that \n% all the changes of the strings after ~\\let~ should be \n% ~\\global~ (\\TeX book p._301). ~\\@LN@vadjustlist~ collects \n% the ~\\vadjust~ items of a paragraph. ~\\PassVadjustList~ \n% tears one ~\\vadjust~ item for the current line out of \n% ~\\@LN@vadjustlist~ and puts it into ~\\@LN@do@vadjusts~. \n% The latter is encountered each line in ~\\MakeLineNo~ \n% (section_\\ref{ss:MLN}), while those \\LaTeX\\ ~\\vadjust~ \n% commands will come rather rarely. So I decided that \n% ~\\@LN@do@vadjust~ is ~\\relax~ until a ~\\vadjust~ item \n% is waiting. In the latter case, ~\\@LN@do@vadjusts~ \n% is turned into a list macro which resets itself to \n% ~\\relax~ when the other contents have been placed in \n% the vertical list.---~\\PassVadjustList~ is invoked by \n% the output routine (section_\\ref{ss:output}), so the \n% ~\\box255~ must be put back. \n\n\\def\\PassVadjustList{% \n \\unvbox\\@cclv \n \\expandafter \\@LN@xnext \\@LN@vadjustlist \\@@ \n \\@tempa \\@LN@vadjustlist \n \\ifx\\@LN@do@vadjusts\\relax \n \\gdef\\@LN@do@vadjusts{\\global\\let\\@LN@do@vadjusts\\relax}% \n \\fi \n \\expandafter \\g@addto@macro \\expandafter \\@LN@do@vadjusts \n \\expandafter {\\@tempa}% \n} \n\n% \n% \\subsection{%\n% Redefining the \\LaTeX\\ commands \n% \\unskip}\\label{ss:ReDef}\n% \n% Now we change ~\\pagebreak~ etc.\\ \n% so that they use ~\\PostponeVadjust~ in place of ~\\vadjust~. \n% We try to do this as independently as possible of the \n% implementation of the \\LaTeX\\ commands to be redefined. \n% Therefore, we don't just copy macro definition code from any \n% single implementation (say, latest \\LaTeX) and insert our \n% changes, but attach a conditional \n% ~\\global\\let\\vadjust\\PostponeVadjust~ \n% to their left ends in a way which should work rather \n% independantly of their actual code. \n% However, ~\\vadjust~ should be the primitive again after \n% execution of the command. So the ~\\global\\let...~ may be used \n% only if it's guaranteed that a ~\\vadjust~ is near.---(UL) \n% Sure? In line numbering mode, probably each ~\\vadjust~ \n% coming from a \\LaTeX\\ command should be ~\\PostponeVadjust~. \n% ~\\marginpar~s and floats seem to be the only cases which \n% are not explicitly dealt with in the present section. \n% This would be a way to avoid ~\\@LN@nobreaktrue~! \n% Of course, the ~\\vadjust~s that the present package uses \n% then must be replaced by ~\\@LN@@vadjust~.---Maybe \n% next time. (/UL) \n%% %% TODO v4.4+ \n% \n% The next command and something else will be added to the \n% \\LaTeX\\ commands we are concerned with here. \n\n\\DeclareRobustCommand\\@LN@changevadjust{% \n \\ifvmode\\else\\ifinner\\else \n \\global\\let\\vadjust\\PostponeVadjust \n \\fi\\fi \n} \n \n% (UL) What about math mode? Math display? Warn? (/UL) \n%% %% TODO v4.4+\n% \n% ~\\@tempa~ will now become a two place macro which adds first \n% argument (single token), enclosed by ~\\ifLineNumbers~\\,\\dots\n% ~\\fi~ to the left of second argument. As long as we need it, \n% we can't use the star form of ~\\DeclareRobustCommand~ or \n% the like, because AMS-\\LaTeX\\ uses ~\\@tempa~ for ~\\@ifstar~. \n% (New v4.41) And for the same reason, that ~\\CheckCommand*~ \n% had to be raised! (/New v4.41)\n\n\\CheckCommand*\\@parboxrestore{\\@arrayparboxrestore\\let\\\\\\@normalcr}\n\n\\def\\@tempa#1#2{% \n \\expandafter \\def \\expandafter#2\\expandafter{\\expandafter\n \\ifLineNumbers\\expandafter#1\\expandafter\\fi#2}% \n} \n\n% (UL) This ~\\ifLineNumber~ can be fooled by \n% ~\\linenumbers~ ahead etc. It might be better to place \n% a signal penalty in any case and let the output routine \n% decide what to do. \n%% \n%% And when this has been done, remove warnings about this. \n% (/UL) \n% \n% We use the occasion to switch off linenumbers where they \n% don't work anyway and where we don't want them, \n% especially in footnotes: \n\n\\@tempa\\nolinenumbers\\@arrayparboxrestore \n\n% We hope this suffices $\\dots$ let's check one thing \n% at least: [(New v4.41) see ~\\CheckCommand~ above (/New v4.41)]\n% \n% Now for the main theme of the section. \n% The next lines assume that ~\\vspace~, ~\\pagebreak~, and \n% ~\\nopagebreak~ use ~\\vadjust~ whenever they occur outside \n% vertical mode; moreover, that they don't directly read \n% an argument. Indeed ~\\pagebreak~ and ~\\nopagebreak~ first \n% call something which tests for a left bracket ahead, \n% while ~\\vspace~ first tests for a star. \n\n\\@tempa\\@LN@changevadjust\\vspace \n\\@tempa\\@LN@changevadjust\\pagebreak \n\\@tempa\\@LN@changevadjust\\nopagebreak \n\n% ~\\\\~, however, uses ~\\vadjust~ only in star or optional form. \n% We relax independency of implementation in assuming \n% that ~\\@normalcr~ is the fragile version of ~\\\\~ \n% (and we use ~\\@ifstar~!). \n%%\n%% \\@ifstar reimplemented 1995/10/16, but seems to be much older. \n%% TODO v4.4+: \n%% \\def\\@LN@cr{% \n%% \\@ifnextchar*{\\@LN@changevadjust\\@normalcr}% \n%% {\\@ifnextchar[{\\@LN@changevadjust\\@normalcr}\\@normalcr}% \n%% } \n%% ---same number of tokens, expansion step less. \n%%\n% (Using a copy of ~\\\\~ would be safer, but an ugly repetition \n% of ~\\protect~.) \n%% %% TODO v4.4+ \n\n\\DeclareRobustCommand\\\\{% \n \\ifLineNumbers \n \\expandafter \\@LN@cr \n \\else \n \\expandafter \\@normalcr \n \\fi \n} \n\\def\\@LN@cr{% \n \\@ifstar{\\@LN@changevadjust\\@normalcr*}% \n {\\@ifnextchar[{\\@LN@changevadjust\\@normalcr}\\@normalcr}% \n} \n\n% Moreover we hope that ~\\newline~ never leads to a ~\\vadjust~, \n% although names of some commands invoked by ~\\\\~ contain \n% ~newline~. At last, this seems to have been OK since 1989 or \n% even earlier. \n% \n% \\modulolinenumbers[1]\n% \\firstlinenumber{0} \n% Let's have a few tests.\\vspace*{.5\\baselineskip} \n% Testing ~\\pagebreak~ and ~\\nopagebreak~ would be too expensive \n% here, but---oops!---we have just experienced a successful \n% ~\\vspace*{.5\\baselineskip}~. A \n% ~\\\\*[.5\\baselineskip]~\\\\*[.5\\baselineskip] may look even more \n% drastical, but this time we are happy about it. Note that the \n% line numbers have moved with the lines. Without our changes, \n% one line number\\vadjust{\\kern.5\\baselineskip} would have \n% ``anticipated'' the move of the next line, just as you can \n% observe it now. \n% (/New v4.00) \n% \n% \\switchlinenumbers \n% \n% \\subsection{% \n% Reminder on obsoleteness \n% \\unskip} \n% \n% (New v4.1) We have completed inclusion of the earlier \n% extension packages ~linenox0.sty~, ~linenox1.sty~, and \n% ~lnopatch.sty~. If one of them is loaded, though, \n% we produce an error message before something weird happens. \n% We avoid ~\\newif~ because the switchings occur so rarely. \n\n\\AtBeginDocument{% \n \\let\\if@LN@obsolete\\iffalse \n \\@ifpackageloaded{linenox0}{\\let\\if@LN@obsolete\\iftrue}\\relax \n \\@ifpackageloaded{linenox1}{\\let\\if@LN@obsolete\\iftrue}\\relax \n \\@ifpackageloaded{lnopatch}{\\let\\if@LN@obsolete\\iftrue}\\relax\n \\if@LN@obsolete \n \\PackageError{lineno}{Obsolete extension package(s)}{% \n With lineno.sty version 4.00 or later,\\MessageBreak \n linenox0/linenox1/lnopatch.sty must no longer be loaded.}% \n \\fi \n} \n\n% \n% \\modulolinenumbers[1]\n% \\section{%\n% The final touch\n% \\unskip}\n%\n% There is one deadcycle for each line number.\n\n\\advance\\maxdeadcycles 100\n\n\\endinput\n\n% \n% \\section{%\n% The user commands\n% \\unskip}\\label{s:UserCmds} \n% \n% The user commands to turn on and off line numbering \n% are \n% \\begin{description}\\item\n% [|\\linenumbers] \\ \\par\n% Turn on line numbering in the current mode.\n%\n% \\item \n% [|\\linenumbers*] \\ \\par$\\qquad$\n% and reset the line number to 1.\n% \\def\\NL{<number>]}\\item \n%% %% Boldface italic occurs here, which is evil. (UL) \n% [|\\linenumbers[\\NL] \\ \\par$\\qquad$\n% and start with <number>. \n% \\item\n% [|\\nolinenumbers] \\ \\par\n% Turn off line numbering.\n% \\item\n% [|\\runninglinenumbers*[\\NL] \\ \\par\n% Turn on ~running~ line numbers, with the same optional\n% arguments as ~\\linenumbers~. The numbers are running\n% through the text over pagebreaks. When you turn\n% numbering off and on again, the numbers will continue,\n% except, of cause, if you ask to reset or preset the\n% counter.\n% \\item\n% [|\\pagewiselinenumbers] \\ \\par\n% Turn on ~pagewise~ line numbers. The lines on each\n% page are numbered beginning with one at the first\n% ~pagewise~ numbered line.\n% \\item\n% [|\\resetlinenumber[\\NL] \\ \\par\n% Reset ~[~Set~]~ the line number to 1\n% ~[~<number>~]~.\n% \\item\n% [|\\setrunninglinenumbers] \\ \\par\n% Switch to ~running~ line number mode. Do \\emph{not}\n% turn it on or off.\n% \\item\n% [|\\setpagewiselinenumbers] \\ \\par\n% Switch to ~pagewise~ line number mode. Do \\emph{not}\n% turn it on or off.\n% \\item\n% [|\\switchlinenumbers*] \\ \\par\n% Causes margin switching in pagewise modes. With the\n% star, put the line numbers on the inner margin.\n% \\item\n% [|\\leftlinenumbers*] \\ \\par\n% \\item\n% [|\\rightlinenumbers*] \\ \\par\n% Set the line numbers in the left/right margin. With the\n% star this works for both modes of operation, without\n% the star only for the currently selected mode. \n% \\item\n% [|\\runningpagewiselinenumbers] \\ \\par\n% When using the pagewise line number mode, do not\n% subtract the page offset. This results in running\n% line numbers again, but with the possibility to switch\n% margins. Be careful when doing line number\n% referencing, this mode status must be the same while\n% setting the paragraph and during references.\n% \\item\n% [|\\realpagewiselinenumbers] \\ \\par\n% Reverses the effect of ~\\runningpagewiselinenumbers~.\n% \\item\n% [|\\modulolinenumbers[\\NL] \\ \\par\n% Give a number only to lines which are multiples of\n% ~[~<number>~]~. If <number> is not specified, the\n% current value in the counter ~linenumbermodulo~ is\n% retained. <number>=1 turns this off without changing\n% ~linenumbermodulo~. The counter is initialized to 5.\n%%\n%% %% TODO v4.4+: `counter', he says. Cf._above. \n%%\n%% (New v4.31) \n% \\item\n% [|\\modulolinenumbers*[\\NL] \\ \\par \n% Like ~\\modulolinenumbers~, the only difference being \n% that the first line number after a ~\\linenumbers~ \n% (or ~\\runninglinenumbers~, ~\\pagewiselinenumbers~, \n% ~\\quotelinenumbers~) is printed regardless of the \n% modulo---yet `1' is printed only after (or \\dots) \n% ~\\firstlinenumber{1}~. \n% This also applies to the first line of a \n% ~{linenumbers}~ or respective environment. \n% See subsection_\\ref{ss:Mod} for another explanation. \n% The behaviour may be unsatisfactory with pagewise \n% line-numbering. \n%% (/New v4.31) \n%% (New v4.00)\n% \\item\n% [|\\firstlinenumber] \\ \\par \n% ~\\firstlinenumber{~<filino>~}~ brings about that \n% (after it) line numbers less than <filino> do \n% \\emph{not} appear in the margin. Moreover, with \n% ~\\modulolinenumbers[~<number>~]~, just the line \n% numbers which are <filino> plus a multiple of \n% <number> are printed.---If you had \n% ~\\firstlinenumber{~<pos>~}~ with some $\\mbox{<pos>}>0$ \n% and want to switch to printing multiples of, e.g., \n% 4, you best do ~\\modulolinenumbers[4]~ and \n% ~\\firstlinenumber{0}~. (See subsection_\\ref{ss:Mod} \n% for technical details.) \n%% (/New v4.00) \n% \\item\n% [|\\linenumberdisplaymath] \\ \\par\n% Number the lines of a display math in a ~{linenomath}~\n% environment, but do not in a ~{linenomath*}~\n% environment. This is used by the package option\n% ~[mathlines]~. \n% \\item\n% [|\\nolinenumberdisplaymath] \\ \\par\n% Do not Number the lines of a display math in a\n% ~{linenomath}~ environment, but do in a\n% ~{linenomath*}~ environment. This is the default.\n% \\item\n% [|\\linelabel] \\ \\par\n% Set a ~\\linelabel{~<foo>~}~ to the line number where\n% this commands is in. Refer to it with the \\LaTeX\\\n% referencing commands ~\\ref{~<foo>~}~ and\n% ~\\pageref{~<foo>~}~.\n% \\end{description}\n% The commands can be used globally, locally within groups\n% or as environments. It is important to know that they \n%%\n%% %% TODO: \\linelabel? others? \n%%\n% take action only when the ~\\par~ is executed. The\n%%\n%% %% TODO: sure? ~\\modulo...~, e.g.? well, in a sense ... \n%%\n% ~\\end{~<mode>~linenumbers}~ commands provide a ~\\par~.\n% Examples:\n% \\begin{verse}\n% ~{\\linenumbers~ <text> ~\\par}~ \\\\\n% \\ \\\\\n% ~\\begin{linenumbers}~ \\\\\n% <text> \\\\\n% ~\\end{linenumbers}~ \\\\\n% \\ \\\\\n% <paragraph> ~{\\linenumbers\\par}~ \\\\\n% \\ \\\\\n% ~\\linenumbers~ \\\\\n% <text> ~\\par~ \\\\\n% ~\\nolinenumbers~ \\\\\n% \\ \\\\\n% ~\\linenumbers~ \\\\\n% <paragraph> ~{\\nolinenumbers\\par}~ \\\\\n% \\end{verse}\n% (New v4.00) \n% However, the examples containing <paragraph> show what you \n% should \\emph{not} do, at least if you use ~\\pagebreak~, \n% ~\\nopagebreak~, ~\\vspace~, ~\\\\*~ or \n% ~\\\\[~<space>~]~---cf._section_\\ref{s:MVadj}. \n%\n% The same care should be applied to the ``wizard'' devices \n% ~\\ifLineNumbers~ (subsection_\\ref{ss:OnOff}) and\n% ~\\PostponeVadjust~ (section_\\ref{ss:PVadj}). \n% (/New v4.00) \n% \n% (New v4.11) Oh, and the commands and environments of \n% section_{s:Xt} are missing. Sorry, I am in a hurry now. \n% May be next time.% %% TODO v4.4+ \n% ---And the environments ~{linenomath}~ and ~{linenomath*}~should \n% get an own paragraph. In short, each math display, equation, \n% or ~{eqnarray}~ should be ``wrapped'' in one of ~{linenomath}~ \n% and ~{linenomath*}~. \n% \n% \\subsection{%\n% Customization hooks\n% \\unskip} \n% \n% There are several hooks to customize the appearance of the\n% line numbers, and some low level hooks for special\n% effects. \n% \\begin{description}\\item\n% [|\\thelinenumber] \\ \\par\n% This macro should give the representation of the line\n% number in the \\LaTeX-counter ~linenumber~. The\n% default is provided by \\LaTeX: \\par$\\qquad$\n% ~\\arabic{linenumber}~\n% \\item\n% [|\\makeLineNumberLeft] \\ \\par\n% This macro is used to attach a line number to the left\n% of the text page. This macro should fill an ~\\hbox to 0pt~ \n% which will be placed at the left margin of the\n% page, with the reference point aligned to the line to\n% which it should give a number. Please use the macro\n% ~\\LineNumber~ to refer to the line number. \n%\n% The default definition is \\par$\\qquad$\n% ~\\hss\\linenumberfont\\LineNumber\\hskip\\linenumbersep~\n% \\item\n% [|\\makeLineNumberRight] \\ \\par\n% Like ~\\makeLineNumberLeft~, but for line numbers on\n% the right margin.\n%\n% The default definition is \\par$\\qquad$\n% ~\\linenumberfont\\hskip\\linenumbersep\\hskip\\textwidth~ \\par$\\qquad$\n% ~\\hbox to\\linenumberwidth{\\hss\\LineNumber}\\hss~\n% \\item\n% [|\\linenumberfont] \\ \\par\n% This macro is initialized to \\par$\\qquad$\n% ~\\normalfont\\tiny\\sffamily~\n% \\item\n% [|\\linenumbersep] \\ \\par\n% This dimension register sets the separation of the\n% linenumber to the text. Default value is ~10pt~.\n% \\item\n% [|\\linenumberwidth] \\ \\par\n% This dimension register sets the width of the line\n% number box on the right margin. The distance of the\n% right edge of the text to the right edge of the line\n% number is ~\\linenumbersep~ + ~\\linenumberwidth~. The\n% default value is ~10pt~. \n% \\item\n% [|\\theLineNumber] (for wizards) \\ \\par\n% This macro is called for printing a ~\\newlabel~ entry\n% to the aux-file. Its definition depends on the mode.\n% For running line numbers it's just ~\\thelinenumber~,\n% while in pagewise mode, the page offset subtraction\n% is done in here.\n% \\item\n% [|\\makeLineNumber] (for wizards) \\ \\par\n% This macro produces the line numbers. The definition\n% depends on the mode. In the running line numbers\n% mode it just expands ~\\makeLineNumberLeft~.\n% \\item\n% [|\\LineNumber] (for wizards) \\ \\par\n% This macro is called by ~\\makeLineNumber~ to typeset\n% the line number. This hook is changed by the modulo\n% mechanism \n%% %%%.\n% and by ~\\firstlinenumber~. \n%% %% New v4.00 \n% \\end{description}\n%% \n%% TODO: \\stepLineNumber---another wizard command!? \n%% Not sure, may be retreated. \n% \\end{document}%D\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n %SSTOPP\n%% TODO v4.4+: Check for unwanted comment marks in new comments \n%% (resulting from manual aligning): search `New v4.2' \n%% and/or ` % '! \n%% TODO v4.4+: Check for missing comment marks where a paragraph \n%% should end/start. Also to prevent empty \"code\" lines. \n%% Especially, new comments at section ends must be \n%% followed by comment mark lines. \n%% And prevent ~\\par~s from blank lines in definitions! \n%% See `visual space' above. \n%% For proper appearance in lineno.tex, note that a comment \n%% in a final code line changes behaviour. \n%% TODO v4.4+: Require README for redistribution? \n%% TODO v4.4+: Since discussions of code have increased so much, it \n%% would be appropriate not to give to this file \n%% extension `.sty' (e.g., `dty'!??). ?? Is quickly read though! \n%% A .sty extraction may be possible even if the present \n%% file is neither a .doc nor a .dtx. (!???) \n%% Use awk line below (etc.) for .doc at least; + .ins or so. \n%% ^ must not be caps! To escape awk. \n%% TODO v4.4+: Underfull lines!? (due to long code quotations) \n%% TODO v4.4+: Sometimes paragraph indents may be appropriate. \n%% TODO Swap first line (`\\iffalse...') with corresponding below. \n Or do *not* swap, maybe nawk is more reliable. \n%% TODO v4.4+: Ponder Stephan's mail from 2004/09/02. \n%% TODO v4.4+: \n%% use \\@ET@makeLineNumber. \n%% plus almost all `(UL)' \n%% plus lots of bad boxes messages \n%% change v4.3 TODOs when postponed \n%% remove {old} environments. \n\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n# awk command lines for v4.00, mixed with former ones: \n\necho \"Don't bother about unknown 'iffalse'.\" # SHELL1 \nnawk '/A[W]K/' lineno.sty | nawk -f - lineno.sty >lineno.tex; # SHELL1\nlatex lineno; latex lineno; latex lineno; latex lineno; # SHELL1\n\nBEGIN{DOC=-1; # AWK DOC A W K\n BEGINCODE = \"\\\\begin{code}\\\\begin{verbatim}\"; # AWK\n ENDCODE = \"\\\\end{verbatim}\\n\\\\end{code}\"; } # AWK\n BEGINCODE = \"% \\\\begin{macrocode}\"; # DOC A W K\n ENDCODE = \"% \\\\end{macrocode}\"; } # DOC A W K\n/^[ \\t]*$/ { ECNT++; next; } # AWK DOC A W K\n/\\\\documentclass/{ sub(\"article\",\"ltxdoc\") } # DOC A W K\n/%D$/ { sub(\"^%* *\",\"\"); sub(\"%D$\",\"\"); # DOC A W K\n print > \"lineno.drv\"; next } # DOC A W K\n/^%%/ { next; } # AWK DOC A W K\n/^%/ { if (!DOC) { print ENDCODE; } # AWK DOC A W K\n DOC=1; ECNT=0; # AWK DOC A W K\n sub(\"^% *\",\"\"); # AWK\n sub(\"^% *\",\"% \"); # DOC A W K\n print; next; } # AWK DOC A W K\n/%VERSION/ { sub(\"%VERSION\",\"\"); print; next; } # AWK \n/%SSTOPP/ { exit } # AWK \nDOC<0 { next } # AWK DOC A W K\n/^-+-$/ { if (!DOC) print ENDCODE; exit } # AWK DOC A W K\n{ if (DOC) { ECNT=DOC=0; print BEGINCODE; } # AWK DOC A W K\n while (ECNT>0) { print \" \"; ECNT--; } # AWK DOC A W K\n print $0; } # AWK DOC A W K\n\n# New v4.00, UL: know nothing about awk; found present solution \n# in hours of trial and error. \n\n% Earlier (should be inhibited by %SSTOPP above and otherwise): \necho \"expect errors for unknown commands 'iffalse' and 'fi'\";# SHELL0 SHELL#1 \nawk '/A[W]K/' lineno.sty | awk -f - lineno.sty >lineno.tex; # SHELL0\nlatex lineno; latex lineno; latex lineno; latex lineno; # SHELL0\nnawk '/A[W]K/' lineno4.sty | nawk -f - lineno4.sty >lineno4.tex; # SHELL#1\nlatex lineno4; latex lineno4; latex lineno4; latex lineno4; # SHELL#1\n\nawk '/DOC A [W] K/' lineno.sty | awk -f - lineno.sty >lineno.doc; # DOC SH\n\nBEGIN{DOC=-1; # A#WK DOC A W K\n BEGINCODE = \"\\\\begin{code}\\\\begin{verbatim}\"; # A#WK\n ENDCODE = \"\\\\end{verbatim}\\n\\\\end{code}\"; } # A#WK\n BEGINCODE = \"% \\\\begin{macrocode}\"; # DOC A W K\n ENDCODE = \"% \\\\end{macrocode}\"; } # DOC A W K\n/^[ \\t]*$/ { ECNT++; next; } # A#WK DOC A W K\n/\\\\documentclass/{ sub(\"article\",\"ltxdoc\") } # DOC A W K\n/%D$/ { sub(\"^%* *\",\"\"); sub(\"%D$\",\"\"); # DOC A W K\n print > \"lineno.drv\"; next } # DOC A W K\n/^%%/ { next; } # A#WK DOC A W K\n/^%/ { if (!DOC) { print ENDCODE; } # A#WK DOC A W K\n DOC=1; ECNT=0; # A#WK DOC A W K\n sub(\"^% *\",\"\"); # A#WK\n sub(\"^% *\",\"% \"); # DOC A W K\n print; next; } # A#WK DOC A W K\nDOC<0 { next } # A#WK DOC A W K\n/^-+-$/ { if (!DOC) print ENDCODE; exit } # A#WK DOC A W K\n{ if (DOC) { ECNT=DOC=0; print BEGINCODE; } # A#WK DOC A W K\n while (ECNT>0) { print \" \"; ECNT--; } # A#WK DOC A W K\n print $0; } # A#WK DOC A W K\n\n\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nIf you are looking here because of the two top lines of the file: \n\nA .tex documentation of this macro file can be obtained by \n\n sh lineno.sty \n\nunder UNIX.--You may find this hint little helpful. One \nreason may be that the awk versions to which you have access \ndon't work suitably. Another reason may be that you don't have \naccess to UNIX (in some sense). However, a .tex, .dvi, or .pdf \nversion of such a documentation should be available from CTAN, \nin the same folder as the present file. When we typed this, that \nfolder was /macros/latex/contrib/lineno. If this has changed in \nthe meantime, a CTAN search should lead you to a folder \ncontaining such a documentation. Or you may get help from one of \nthe e-mail addresses above. \n\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: linenoaa.sty\n================================================\n\\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[2003/12/01]\n\\ProvidesPackage{linenoaa}[2023/03/12 v0.02]\n\n\\providecommand{\\addto}[2]{%\n \\ifx#1\\@undefined\n \\def#1{#2}%\n \\else\n \\ifx#1\\relax\n \\def#1{#2}%\n \\else\n {\\toks@\\expandafter{#1#2}%\n \\xdef#1{\\the\\toks@}}%\n \\fi\n \\fi\n}\n\n\\newif\\ifGPL@lineno@desactivate\n\\GPL@lineno@desactivatefalse\n\n\\DeclareOption{desactivate}{\n\t\\providecommand{\\@LN}{\\@gobbletwo}\n\t\\providecommand{\\@LN@col}{\\@gobble}\n\t\\GPL@lineno@desactivatetrue\t\n}\n\\DeclareOption*{\n\t\\PassOptionsToPackage{\\CurrentOption}{lineno}\n}\n\\ProcessOptions\\relax\n\n\\ifGPL@lineno@desactivate\n\t\\endinput\n\\fi\n\n\\RequirePackage{lineno}[2005/11/02 v4.41]\n\n\\addto\\maketitle{\\linenumbers\\relax}\n\n\\def\\linenumberfont{\\normalfont\\scriptsize\\sffamily}\n\n\\modulolinenumbers[10]\n\n\\@namedef{eqnarray*}{\\def\\@eqncr{\\nonumber\\@seqncr}\\linenomath\\eqnarray}\n\\@namedef{endeqnarray*}{\\nonumber\\endeqnarray\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\@ifpackageloaded{amsmath}{%\n\\renewenvironment{multline}{\\linenomathNonumbers\\start@multline\\st@rredfalse}{%\n\t\\iftagsleft@ \\@xp\\lendmultline@ \\else \\@xp\\rendmultline@ \\fi\n\t\\endlinenomath\\ignorespacesafterend}\n\n\\renewenvironment{multline*}{\\linenomath\\start@multline\\st@rredtrue}{\\endmultline\\endlinenomath}\n\n\n\\renewenvironment{gather}{\\linenomathNonumbers\\start@gather\\st@rredfalse}{%\n \\math@cr \\black@\\totwidth@ \\egroup\n $$\\endlinenomath\\ignorespacesafterend}\n\n\\renewenvironment{gather*}{\\linenomath\\start@gather\\st@rredtrue}{\\endgather\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{alignat}{\\linenomathNonumbers\\start@align\\z@\\st@rredfalse}{%\n\\endalign\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{alignat*}{\\linenomath\\start@align\\z@\\st@rredtrue}{\\endalign\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{xalignat}{\\linenomathNonumbers\\start@align\\@ne\\st@rredfalse}{%\n\\endalign\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{xalignat*}{\\linenomath\\start@align\\@ne\\st@rredtrue}{\\endalign\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{xxalignat}{\\linenomath\\start@align\\tw@\\st@rredtrue}{\\endalign\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{align}{\\linenomathNonumbers\\start@align\\@ne\\st@rredfalse\\m@ne}{%\n \\math@cr \\black@\\totwidth@\n \\egroup\n \\ifingather@\n \\restorealignstate@\n \\egroup\n \\nonumber\n \\ifnum0=`{\\fi\\iffalse}\\fi\n \\else\n $$%\n \\fi\n \\endlinenomath\n \\ignorespacesafterend}\n \n\\renewenvironment{align*}{\\linenomath\\start@align\\@ne\\st@rredtrue\\m@ne}{\\endalign\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{flalign}{\\linenomathNonumbers\\start@align\\tw@\\st@rredfalse\\m@ne}{%\n\\endalign\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{flalign*}{\\linenomath\\start@align\\tw@\\st@rredtrue\\m@ne}{\\endalign\\endlinenomath}\n\n\\renewenvironment{equation}{%\n \\linenomathNonumbers\\incr@eqnum\n \\mathdisplay@push\n \\st@rredfalse \\global\\@eqnswtrue\n \\mathdisplay{equation}%\n}{%\n \\endmathdisplay{equation}%\n \\mathdisplay@pop\n \\endlinenomath\n \\ignorespacesafterend}\n \n\\renewenvironment{equation*}{%\n \\linenomath\\mathdisplay@push\n \\st@rredtrue \\global\\@eqnswfalse\n \\mathdisplay{equation*}%\n}{%\n \\endmathdisplay{equation*}%\n \\mathdisplay@pop\n \\endlinenomath\n \\ignorespacesafterend}}{%\n\\def\\equation{\\linenomathNonumbers$$\\refstepcounter{equation}}\n\\def\\endequation{\\eqno \\hbox{\\@eqnnum}$$\\endlinenomath\\@ignoretrue}}\n\n\\@ifpackagewith{amsmath}{fleqn}{%\n\\renewenvironment{eqnarray}{%\n \\stepcounter{equation}%\n \\def\\@currentlabel{\\p@equation\\theequation}%\n \\global\\@eqnswtrue\\m@th\n \\global\\@eqcnt\\z@\n \\tabskip\\mathindent\n \\let\\\\=\\@eqncr\n \\setlength\\abovedisplayskip{\\topsep}%\n \\ifvmode\n \\addtolength\\abovedisplayskip{\\partopsep}%\n \\fi\n \\addtolength\\abovedisplayskip{\\parskip}%\n \\setlength\\belowdisplayskip{\\abovedisplayskip}%\n \\setlength\\belowdisplayshortskip{\\abovedisplayskip}%\n \\setlength\\abovedisplayshortskip{\\abovedisplayskip}%\n \\linenomathNonumbers$$\\everycr{}\\halign to\\linewidth% $$\n \\bgroup\n \\hskip\\@centering\n $\\displaystyle\\tabskip\\z@skip{##}$\\@eqnsel&%\n \\global\\@eqcnt\\@ne \\hskip \\tw@\\arraycolsep \\hfil${##}$\\hfil&%\n \\global\\@eqcnt\\tw@ \\hskip \\tw@\\arraycolsep\n $\\displaystyle{##}$\\hfil \\tabskip\\@centering&%\n \\global\\@eqcnt\\thr@@\n \\hb@xt@\\z@\\bgroup\\hss##\\egroup\\tabskip\\z@skip\\cr}%\n {\\@@eqncr\n \\egroup\n \\global\\advance\\c@equation\\m@ne$$% $$\n \\endlinenomath\n \\@ignoretrue}}{}\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: naddaf.bib\n================================================\n@ARTICLE{joly1987,\n author = {{Joly}, M.},\n title = \"{Formation of low ionization lines in active galactic nuclei.}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Balmer Series, Ionization, Spectral Line Width, Heavy Elements, Low Temperature, Astrophysics},\n year = 1987,\n month = oct,\n volume = {184},\n pages = {33-42},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987A&A...184...33J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@BOOK{krolik_book1999,\n author = {{Krolik}, Julian H.},\n title = \"{Active galactic nuclei : from the central black hole to the galactic environment}\",\n year = 1999,\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999agnc.book.....K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{williams2018,\n author = {{Williams}, James K. and {Gliozzi}, Mario and {Rudzinsky}, Ross V.},\n title = \"{Are narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies highly accreting low-M$_{BH}$ AGNs?}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, X-rays: galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = oct,\n volume = {480},\n number = {1},\n pages = {96-107},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty1868},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480...96W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{marziani2003b,\n author = {{Marziani}, Paola and {Zamanov}, Radoslav K. and {Sulentic}, Jack W. and {Calvani}, Massimo},\n title = \"{Searching for the physical drivers of eigenvector 1: influence of black hole mass and Eddington ratio}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = nov,\n volume = {345},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1133-1144},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07033.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0307367},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.345.1133M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{king2007,\n author = {{King}, A.~R. and {Pringle}, J.~E. and {Livio}, M.},\n title = \"{Accretion disc viscosity: how big is alpha?}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = apr,\n volume = {376},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1740-1746},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11556.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0701803},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.376.1740K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{uttley2011,\n author = {{Uttley}, P. and {Wilkinson}, T. and {Cassatella}, P. and {Wilms}, J. and {Pottschmidt}, K. and {Hanke}, M. and {B{\\\"o}ck}, M.},\n title = \"{The causal connection between disc and power-law variability in hard state black hole X-ray binaries}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, X-rays: binaries, X-rays: individual: GX 339-4, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = jun,\n volume = {414},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L60-L64},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01056.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1104.0634},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.414L..60U},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{watarai2003,\n author = {{Watarai}, Ken-ya and {Mineshige}, Shin},\n title = \"{Model for Relaxation Oscillations of a Luminous Accretion Disk in GRS 1915+105: Variable Inner Edge}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Accretion, Accretion Disks, Black Hole Physics, X-Rays: Binaries, X-Rays: Stars, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = oct,\n volume = {596},\n number = {1},\n pages = {421-428},\n doi = {10.1086/377576},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0306548},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...596..421W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{ss1976,\n author = {{Shakura}, N.~I. and {Sunyaev}, R.~A.},\n title = \"{A theory of the instability of disk accretion on to black holes and the variability of binary X-ray sources, galactic nuclei and quasars.}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Binary Stars, Black Holes (Astronomy), Galactic Nuclei, Quasars, Thermal Instability, X Ray Sources, Asymptotic Methods, Disks (Shapes), Perturbation Theory, Standing Waves, Traveling Waves, Astrophysics},\n year = 1976,\n month = jun,\n volume = {175},\n pages = {613-632},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/175.3.613},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976MNRAS.175..613S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{piran1978,\n author = {{Piran}, T.},\n title = \"{The role of viscosity and cooling mechanisms in the stability of accretion disks.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cooling, Stellar Mass Accretion, Stellar Models, Thermal Stability, Viscosity, Binary Stars, Black Holes (Astronomy), Disks (Shapes), X Ray Stars, Astrophysics, Accretion Disks:Hydrodynamics, Accretion Disks: Stability},\n year = 1978,\n month = apr,\n volume = {221},\n pages = {652-660},\n doi = {10.1086/156069},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ApJ...221..652P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{jiang2013b,\n author = {{Jiang}, Yan-Fei and {Stone}, James M. and {Davis}, Shane W.},\n title = \"{On the Thermal Stability of Radiation-dominated Accretion Disks}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, magnetohydrodynamics: MHD, methods: numerical, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2013,\n month = nov,\n volume = {778},\n number = {1},\n eid = {65},\n pages = {65},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/65},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1309.5646},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...778...65J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{jiang2013a,\n author = {{Jiang}, Yan-Fei and {Stone}, James M. and {Davis}, Shane W.},\n title = \"{Saturation of the Magneto-rotational Instability in Strongly Radiation-dominated Accretion Disks}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {magnetohydrodynamics: MHD, methods: numerical, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2013,\n month = apr,\n volume = {767},\n number = {2},\n eid = {148},\n pages = {148},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/148},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1303.1823},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767..148J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Stella1984,\n author = {{Stella}, L. and {Rosner}, R.},\n title = \"{Magnetic field instabilities in accretion disks}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Accretion Disks, Magnetic Flux, Magnetohydrodynamic Stability, Stellar Mass Accretion, Buoyancy, Gas Pressure, Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability, Radiation Pressure, Rayleigh Waves, Reynolds Stress, Stellar Coronas, Taylor Instability, Astrophysics},\n year = 1984,\n month = feb,\n volume = {277},\n pages = {312-321},\n doi = {10.1086/161697},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984ApJ...277..312S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Sakimoto1981,\n author = {{Sakimoto}, P.~J. and {Coroniti}, F.~V.},\n title = \"{Accretion disk models for QSOs and active galactic nuclei - The role of magnetic viscosity}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Black Holes (Astronomy), Magnetic Properties, Quasars, Stellar Mass Accretion, Viscosity, Black Body Radiation, Gas Pressure, Mass Ratios, Stellar Models, Thermal Instability, X Ray Sources, Astrophysics},\n year = 1981,\n month = jul,\n volume = {247},\n pages = {19-31},\n doi = {10.1086/159005},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ApJ...247...19S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{hirose2009,\n author = {{Hirose}, Shigenobu and {Krolik}, Julian H. and {Blaes}, Omer},\n title = \"{Radiation-Dominated Disks are Thermally Stable}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, instabilities, MHD, radiative transfer, Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = jan,\n volume = {691},\n number = {1},\n pages = {16-31},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/691/1/16},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0809.1708},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...691...16H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{blaes2001,\n author = {{Blaes}, Omer and {Socrates}, Aristotle},\n title = \"{Local Dynamical Instabilities in Magnetized, Radiation Pressure-supported Accretion Disks}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Accretion, Accretion Disks, Black Hole Physics, Instabilities, Magnetohydrodynamics: MHD, Astrophysics},\n year = 2001,\n month = jun,\n volume = {553},\n number = {2},\n pages = {987-998},\n doi = {10.1086/320968},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0011097},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...553..987B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{done2012,\n author = {{Done}, Chris and {Davis}, S.~W. and {Jin}, C. and {Blaes}, O. and {Ward}, M.},\n title = \"{Intrinsic disc emission and the soft X-ray excess in active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, black hole physics, galaxies: active, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = mar,\n volume = {420},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1848-1860},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19779.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1107.5429},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.420.1848D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{lightman1974,\n author = {{Lightman}, Alan P. and {Eardley}, Douglas M.},\n title = \"{Black Holes in Binary Systems: Instability of Disk Accretion}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n year = 1974,\n month = jan,\n volume = {187},\n pages = {L1},\n doi = {10.1086/181377},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...187L...1L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{baskin2014,\n author = {{Baskin}, Alexei and {Laor}, Ari and {Stern}, Jonathan},\n title = \"{Radiation pressure confinement - II. Application to the broad-line region in active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = feb,\n volume = {438},\n number = {1},\n pages = {604-619},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt2230},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1309.7953},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438..604B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{pringle1981,\n author = {{Pringle}, J.~E.},\n title = \"{Accretion discs in astrophysics}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {Astrophysics, Disks (Shapes), Gravitational Effects, Mass Transfer, Radiative Transfer, Stellar Mass Accretion, Angular Momentum, Circular Orbits, Neutron Stars, Orbital Mechanics, Rotating Fluids, Stellar Radiation, Viscosity, Astrophysics},\n year = 1981,\n month = jan,\n volume = {19},\n pages = {137-162},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev.aa.19.090181.001033},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ARA&A..19..137P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{jiang2019,\n author = {{Jiang}, Yan-Fei and {Blaes}, Omer and {Stone}, James M. and {Davis}, Shane W.},\n title = \"{Global Radiation Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of sub-Eddington Accretion Disks around Supermassive Black Holes}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, magnetohydrodynamics: MHD, methods: numerical, quasars: supermassive black holes, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2019,\n month = nov,\n volume = {885},\n number = {2},\n eid = {144},\n pages = {144},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a00},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1904.01674},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...885..144J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{merloni2006,\n author = {{Merloni}, Andrea and {Nayakshin}, Sergei},\n title = \"{On the limit-cycle instability in magnetized accretion discs}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, black hole physics, X-rays: binaries, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = oct,\n volume = {372},\n number = {2},\n pages = {728-734},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10889.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0603159},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.372..728M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{begelman2015,\n author = {{Begelman}, Mitchell C. and {Armitage}, Philip J. and {Reynolds}, Christopher S.},\n title = \"{Accretion Disk Dynamo as the Trigger for X-Ray Binary State Transitions}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, binaries: close, black hole physics, magnetic fields, X-rays: binaries, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2015,\n month = aug,\n volume = {809},\n number = {2},\n eid = {118},\n pages = {118},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/118},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1507.03996},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...809..118B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@BOOK{frank2002,\n author = {{Frank}, Juhan and {King}, Andrew and {Raine}, Derek J.},\n title = \"{Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition}\",\n year = 2002,\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002apa..book.....F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{czerny2004a,\n author = {{Czerny}, B. and {R{\\'o}za{\\'n}ska}, A. and {Kuraszkiewicz}, J.},\n title = \"{Constraints for the accretion disk evaporation rate in AGN from the existence of the Broad Line Region}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, X-rays: galaxies, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = dec,\n volume = {428},\n pages = {39-49},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20040487},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0403507},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...428...39C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{peterson1993,\n author = {{Peterson}, Bradley M.},\n title = \"{Reverberation Mapping of Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\pasp},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Astronomical Maps, Emission Spectra, Reverberation, Astronomical Spectroscopy, Cross Correlation, Luminosity, Spectral Line Width, Transfer Functions, Astrophysics, GALAXIES: ACTIVE, GALAXIES: NUCLEI, METHODS: ANALYTICAL},\n year = 1993,\n month = mar,\n volume = {105},\n pages = {247},\n doi = {10.1086/133140},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993PASP..105..247P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{sulentic2000,\n author = {{Sulentic}, J.~W. and {Marziani}, P. and {Dultzin-Hacyan}, D.},\n title = \"{Phenomenology of Broad Emission Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\araa},\n keywords = {SEYFERT GALAXIES, QUASARS, ACCRETION DISKS, SPECTROSCOPY, EMISSION LINES, LINE FORMATION},\n year = 2000,\n month = jan,\n volume = {38},\n pages = {521-571},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.521},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ARA&A..38..521S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{marinello2020,\n author = {{Marinello}, Murilo and {Rodr{\\'\\i}guez-Ardila}, Alberto and {Marziani}, Paola and {Sigut}, Aaron and {Pradhan}, Anil},\n title = \"{Panchromatic properties of the extreme Fe II emitter PHL 1092}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, techniques: spectroscopic, individual: PHL 1092, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = may,\n volume = {494},\n number = {3},\n pages = {4187-4202},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa934},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2004.01811},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.4187M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{coatman2016,\n author = {{Coatman}, Liam and {Hewett}, Paul C. and {Banerji}, Manda and {Richards}, Gordon T.},\n title = \"{C IV emission-line properties and systematic trends in quasar black hole mass estimates}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = sep,\n volume = {461},\n number = {1},\n pages = {647-665},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw1360},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1606.02726},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461..647C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{coatman2017,\n author = {{Coatman}, Liam and {Hewett}, Paul C. and {Banerji}, Manda and {Richards}, Gordon T. and {Hennawi}, Joseph F. and {Prochaska}, J. Xavier},\n title = \"{Correcting C IV-based virial black hole masses}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = feb,\n volume = {465},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2120-2142},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw2797},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1610.08977},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.2120C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{temple2021,\n author = {{Temple}, Matthew J. and {Ferland}, Gary J. and {Rankine}, Amy L. and {Chatzikos}, Marios and {Hewett}, Paul C.},\n title = \"{High-ionization emission-line ratios from quasar broad-line regions: metallicity or density?}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {line: formation, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = aug,\n volume = {505},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3247-3259},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stab1610},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2106.01379},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.3247T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{mlma2018,\n author = {{Mart{\\'\\i}nez-Aldama}, M.~L. and {del Olmo}, A. and {Marziani}, P. and {Sulentic}, J.~W. and {Negrete}, C.~A. and {Dultzin}, D. and {D'Onofrio}, M. and {Perea}, J.},\n title = \"{Extreme quasars at high redshift}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {quasars: general, quasars: emission lines, quasars: supermassive black holes, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = nov,\n volume = {618},\n eid = {A179},\n pages = {A179},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201833541},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1807.11006},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...618A.179M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{negrete2018,\n author = {{Negrete}, C.~A. and {Dultzin}, D. and {Marziani}, P. and {Esparza}, D. and {Sulentic}, J.~W. and {del Olmo}, A. and {Mart{\\'\\i}nez-Aldama}, M.~L. and {Garc{\\'\\i}a L{\\'o}pez}, A. and {D'Onofrio}, M. and {Bon}, N. and {Bon}, E.},\n title = \"{Highly accreting quasars: The SDSS low-redshift catalog}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {catalogs, galaxies: active, galaxies: distances and redshifts, galaxies: nuclei, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = dec,\n volume = {620},\n eid = {A118},\n pages = {A118},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201833285},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1809.08310},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...620A.118N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{eracleous94,\n author = {{Eracleous}, Michael and {Halpern}, Jules P.},\n title = \"{Double-peaked Emission Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Accretion Disks, Active Galactic Nuclei, Astronomical Models, Demography, Emission Spectra, H Alpha Line, Line Shape, Quasars, Radio Galaxies, Red Shift, Relativistic Effects, Taxonomy, Astronomical Observatories, Calibrating, Charge Coupled Devices, Near Infrared Radiation, Spectral Line Width, Spectroscopic Telescopes, Astrophysics, ACCRETION, ACCRETION DISKS, GALAXIES: ACTIVE, GALAXIES: QUASARS: GENERAL},\n year = 1994,\n month = jan,\n volume = {90},\n pages = {1},\n doi = {10.1086/191856},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJS...90....1E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{field1965,\n author = {{Field}, George B.},\n title = \"{Thermal Instability.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1965,\n month = aug,\n volume = {142},\n pages = {531},\n doi = {10.1086/148317},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1965ApJ...142..531F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{loska2004,\n author = {{Loska}, Z. and {Czerny}, B. and {Szczerba}, R.},\n title = \"{Irradiation of accretion discs in active galactic nuclei due to the presence of a warm absorber}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, radiative transfer, galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, X-rays: galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = dec,\n volume = {355},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1080-1090},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08387.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0409221},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.355.1080L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{qwind3,\n author = {{Quera-Bofarull}, Arnau and {Done}, Chris and {Lacey}, Cedric G. and {Nomura}, Mariko and {Ohsuga}, Ken},\n title = \"{Qwind3: UV line-driven accretion disc wind models for AGN feedback}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = nov,\n eid = {arXiv:2111.02742},\n pages = {arXiv:2111.02742},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2111.02742},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021arXiv211102742Q},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{Giustini2021,\n author = {{Giustini}, Margherita and {Proga}, Daniel},\n title = \"{The role of failed accretion disk winds in active galactic nuclei}\",\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, black hole physics, galaxies: active, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n booktitle = {Nuclear Activity in Galaxies Across Cosmic Time},\n year = 2021,\n editor = {{Povi{\\'c}}, Mirjana and {Marziani}, Paola and {Masegosa}, Josefa and {Netzer}, Hagai and {Negu}, Seblu H. and {Tessema}, Solomon B.},\n volume = {356},\n month = jan,\n pages = {82-86},\n doi = {10.1017/S1743921320002628},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2002.07564},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021IAUS..356...82G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{krolik1981,\n author = {{Krolik}, J.~H. and {McKee}, C.~F. and {Tarter}, C.~B.},\n title = \"{Two-phase models of quasar emission line regions.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Astronomical Models, Emission Spectra, Hydrogen Clouds, Quasars, Two Phase Flow, X Ray Sources, Compton Effect, Gas Temperature, Line Spectra, Phase Diagrams, Photoionization, Spectrum Analysis, Astrophysics},\n year = 1981,\n month = oct,\n volume = {249},\n pages = {422-442},\n doi = {10.1086/159303},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ApJ...249..422K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{dyda2018,\n author = {{Dyda}, Sergei and {Proga}, Daniel},\n title = \"{Non-axisymmetric line-driven disc winds - I. Disc perturbations}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {hydrodynamics, methods: numerical, novae, cataclysmic variables, stars: winds, outflows, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2018,\n month = apr,\n volume = {475},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3786-3796},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty030},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1710.07882},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475.3786D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{begelman1990,\n author = {{Begelman}, Mitchell C. and {McKee}, Christopher F.},\n title = \"{Global Effects of Thermal Conduction on Two-Phase Media}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Interstellar Matter, Lyman Alpha Radiation, Mass Transfer, Nonuniform Plasmas, Quasars, Thermal Conductivity, Absorption Spectra, Active Galactic Nuclei, Compton Effect, Lyman Spectra, Astrophysics, HYDRODYNAMICS, INTERSTELLAR: MATTER, QUASARS},\n year = 1990,\n month = aug,\n volume = {358},\n pages = {375},\n doi = {10.1086/168994},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ApJ...358..375B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{king2010,\n author = {{King}, A.~R.},\n title = \"{Black hole outflows}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, black hole physics, galaxies: active, galaxies: formation, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = mar,\n volume = {402},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1516-1522},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16013.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0911.1639},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.402.1516K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{hernan2016,\n author = {{Hern{\\'a}n-Caballero}, Antonio and {Hatziminaoglou}, Evanthia and {Alonso-Herrero}, Almudena and {Mateos}, Silvia},\n title = \"{The near-to-mid infrared spectrum of quasars}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, infrared: galaxies, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2016,\n month = dec,\n volume = {463},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2064-2078},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw2107},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1605.04867},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.463.2064H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{dexter_GRAVITY2020,\n author = {{Gravity Collaboration} and {Dexter}, J. and {Shangguan}, J. and {H{\\\"o}nig}, S. and {Kishimoto}, M. and {Lutz}, D. and {Netzer}, H. and {Davies}, R. and {Sturm}, E. and {Pfuhl}, O. and {Amorim}, A. and {Baub{\\\"o}ck}, M. and {Brandner}, W. and {Cl{\\'e}net}, Y. and {de Zeeuw}, P.~T. and {Eckart}, A. and {Eisenhauer}, F. and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, N.~M. and {Gao}, F. and {Garcia}, P.~J.~V. and {Genzel}, R. and {Gillessen}, S. and {Gratadour}, D. and {Jim{\\'e}nez-Rosales}, A. and {Lacour}, S. and {Millour}, F. and {Ott}, T. and {Paumard}, T. and {Perraut}, K. and {Perrin}, G. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Petrucci}, P.~O. and {Prieto}, M.~A. and {Rouan}, D. and {Schartmann}, M. and {Shimizu}, T. and {Sternberg}, A. and {Straub}, O. and {Straubmeier}, C. and {Tacconi}, L.~J. and {Tristram}, K. and {Vermot}, P. and {Waisberg}, I. and {Widmann}, F. and {Woillez}, J.},\n title = \"{The resolved size and structure of hot dust in the immediate vicinity of AGN}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: nuclei, techniques: interferometric, galaxies: active, quasars: general, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2020,\n month = mar,\n volume = {635},\n eid = {A92},\n pages = {A92},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201936767},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1910.00593},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...635A..92G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{arav1998,\n author = {{Arav}, Nahum and {Barlow}, Tom A. and {Laor}, Ari and {Sargent}, Wallace L.~W. and {Blandford}, Roger D.},\n title = \"{Are AGN broad emission lines formed by discrete clouds? Analysis of Keck high-resolution spectroscopy of NGC 4151}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: ACTIVE, GALAXIES: INDIVIDUAL: NGC4151, QUASARS: EMISSION LINES, GALAXIES: SEYFERT, Astrophysics},\n year = 1998,\n month = jul,\n volume = {297},\n number = {4},\n pages = {990-998},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.297004990.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9801012},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998MNRAS.297..990A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{waters2021,\n author = {{Waters}, Tim and {Proga}, Daniel and {Dannen}, Randall},\n title = \"{Multiphase AGN Winds from X-Ray-irradiated Disk Atmospheres}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active galactic nuclei, 16, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = jun,\n volume = {914},\n number = {1},\n eid = {62},\n pages = {62},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/abfbe6},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2101.09273},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...914...62W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{rozanska2000,\n author = {{R{\\'o}{\\.z}a{\\'n}ska}, A. and {Czerny}, B.},\n title = \"{Two-phase radiative/conductive equilibrium in active galactic nuclei and galactic black holes}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {ACCRETION, ACCRETION DISCS, BLACK HOLE PHYSICS, BINARIES: GENERAL, GALAXIES: ACTIVE, QUASARS: GENERAL, X-RAYS: STARS, Astrophysics},\n year = 2000,\n month = aug,\n volume = {316},\n number = {3},\n pages = {473-478},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03429.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9906101},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.316..473R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{ganguly2021,\n author = {{Ganguly}, Shalini and {Proga}, Daniel and {Waters}, Tim and {Dannen}, Randall C. and {Dyda}, Sergei and {Giustini}, Margherita and {Kallman}, Timothy and {Raymond}, John and {Miller}, Jon and {Rodriguez Hidalgo}, Paola},\n title = \"{On Synthetic Absorption Line Profiles of Thermally Driven Winds from Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Hydrodynamical simulations, Photoionization, Active galactic nuclei, 767, 2060, 16, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2021,\n month = jun,\n volume = {914},\n number = {2},\n eid = {114},\n pages = {114},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/abf939},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2103.06497},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...914..114G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{adhikari2016,\n author = {{Adhikari}, T.~P. and {R{\\'o}{\\.z}a{\\'n}ska}, A. and {Czerny}, B. and {Hryniewicz}, K. and {Ferland}, G.~J.},\n title = \"{The Intermediate-line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: individual: NLR-BLR, methods: numerical, quasars: emission lines, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = nov,\n volume = {831},\n number = {1},\n eid = {68},\n pages = {68},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/68},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1606.00284},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...831...68A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{schmidt1963,\n author = {{Schmidt}, M.},\n title = \"{3C 273 : A Star-Like Object with Large Red-Shift}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n year = 1963,\n month = mar,\n volume = {197},\n number = {4872},\n pages = {1040},\n doi = {10.1038/1971040a0},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1963Natur.197.1040S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{GRAVITY3C273_2018,\n author = {{Gravity Collaboration} and {Sturm}, E. and {Dexter}, J. and {Pfuhl}, O. and {Stock}, M.~R. and {Davies}, R.~I. and {Lutz}, D. and {Cl{\\'e}net}, Y. and {Eckart}, A. and {Eisenhauer}, F. and {Genzel}, R. and {Gratadour}, D. and {H{\\\"o}nig}, S.~F. and {Kishimoto}, M. and {Lacour}, S. and {Millour}, F. and {Netzer}, H. and {Perrin}, G. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Petrucci}, P.~O. and {Rouan}, D. and {Waisberg}, I. and {Woillez}, J. and {Amorim}, A. and {Brandner}, W. and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, N.~M. and {Garcia}, P.~J.~V. and {Gillessen}, S. and {Ott}, T. and {Paumard}, T. and {Perraut}, K. and {Scheithauer}, S. and {Straubmeier}, C. and {Tacconi}, L.~J. and {Widmann}, F.},\n title = \"{Spatially resolved rotation of the broad-line region of a quasar at sub-parsec scale}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = nov,\n volume = {563},\n number = {7733},\n pages = {657-660},\n doi = {10.1038/s41586-018-0731-9},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1811.11195},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.563..657G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{marziani2003a,\n author = {{Marziani}, P. and {Sulentic}, J.~W. and {Zamanov}, R. and {Calvani}, M. and {Dultzin-Hacyan}, D. and {Bachev}, R. and {Zwitter}, T.},\n title = \"{An Optical Spectroscopic Atlas of Low-Redshift Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Atlases, Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Nuclei, Galaxies: Quasars: Emission Lines, Galaxies: Quasars: General},\n year = 2003,\n month = apr,\n volume = {145},\n number = {2},\n pages = {199-211},\n doi = {10.1086/346025},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJS..145..199M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{wang_shielding2014,\n author = {{Wang}, Jian-Min and {Qiu}, Jie and {Du}, Pu and {Ho}, Luis C.},\n title = \"{Self-shadowing Effects of Slim Accretion Disks in Active Galactic Nuclei: The Diverse Appearance of the Broad-line Region}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2014,\n month = dec,\n volume = {797},\n number = {1},\n eid = {65},\n pages = {65},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/65},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1410.5285},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...797...65W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{popovic2021,\n author = {{Popovi{\\'c}}, Luka {\\v{C}}. and {Shablovinskaya}, Elena and {Savi{\\'c}}, Djordje},\n title = \"{Polarization in broad emission lines of active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {Astronomische Nachrichten},\n keywords = {active galactic nuclei, emission lines, polarization, black holes, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = jan,\n volume = {343},\n number = {1-2},\n eid = {e210089},\n pages = {e210089},\n doi = {10.1002/asna.20210089},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2111.06237},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AN....34310089P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{swayam_cafeIII2021,\n author = {{Panda}, Swayamtrupta},\n title = \"{The CaFe project: Optical Fe II and near-infrared Ca II triplet emission in active galaxies: simulated EWs and the co-dependence of cloud size and metal content}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, radiative transfer, methods: data analysis, galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, galaxies: abundances, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2021,\n month = jun,\n volume = {650},\n eid = {A154},\n pages = {A154},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202140393},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2004.13113},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...650A.154P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{baldwin1997,\n author = {{Baldwin}, J.~A.},\n title = \"{Broad Emission Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n booktitle = {IAU Colloq. 159: Emission Lines in Active Galaxies: New Methods and Techniques},\n year = 1997,\n editor = {{Peterson}, Bradley M. and {Cheng}, Fu-Zhen and {Wilson}, Andrew S.},\n series = {Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series},\n volume = {113},\n month = jan,\n pages = {80},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ASPC..113...80B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Dragana2012,\n author = {{Ili{\\'c}}, D. and {Popovi{\\'c}}, L. {\\v{C}}. and {La Mura}, G. and {Ciroi}, S. and {Rafanelli}, P.},\n title = \"{The analysis of the broad hydrogen Balmer line ratios: Possible implications for the physical properties of the broad line region of AGNs}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, line: formation, plasmas, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = jul,\n volume = {543},\n eid = {A142},\n pages = {A142},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201219299},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1205.3950},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...543A.142I},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{GRAVITYIRAS_2020,\n author = {{Gravity Collaboration} and {Amorim}, A. and {Baub{\\\"o}ck}, M. and {Brandner}, W. and {Cl{\\'e}net}, Y. and {Davies}, R. and {de Zeeuw}, P.~T. and {Dexter}, J. and {Eckart}, A. and {Eisenhauer}, F. and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, N.~M. and {Gao}, F. and {Garcia}, P.~J.~V. and {Genzel}, R. and {Gillessen}, S. and {Gratadour}, D. and {H{\\\"o}nig}, S. and {Kishimoto}, M. and {Lacour}, S. and {Lutz}, D. and {Millour}, F. and {Netzer}, H. and {Ott}, T. and {Paumard}, T. and {Perraut}, K. and {Perrin}, G. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Petrucci}, P.~O. and {Pfuhl}, O. and {Prieto}, M.~A. and {Rouan}, D. and {Shangguan}, J. and {Shimizu}, T. and {Schartmann}, M. and {Stadler}, J. and {Sternberg}, A. and {Straub}, O. and {Straubmeier}, C. and {Sturm}, E. and {Tacconi}, L.~J. and {Tristram}, K.~R.~W. and {Vermot}, P. and {von Fellenberg}, S. and {Waisberg}, I. and {Widmann}, F. and {Woillez}, J.},\n title = \"{The spatially resolved broad line region of IRAS 09149-6206}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, quasars: supermassive black holes, techniques: interferometric, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2020,\n month = nov,\n volume = {643},\n eid = {A154},\n pages = {A154},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202039067},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2009.08463},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A.154G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{GRAVITY3783_2021,\n author = {{Gravity Collaboration} and {Amorim}, A. and {Baub{\\\"o}ck}, M. and {Brandner}, W. and {Bolzer}, M. and {Cl{\\'e}net}, Y. and {Davies}, R. and {de Zeeuw}, P.~T. and {Dexter}, J. and {Drescher}, A. and {Eckart}, A. and {Eisenhauer}, F. and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, N.~M. and {Gao}, F. and {Garcia}, P.~J.~V. and {Genzel}, R. and {Gillessen}, S. and {Gratadour}, D. and {H{\\\"o}nig}, S. and {Kaltenbrunner}, D. and {Kishimoto}, M. and {Lacour}, S. and {Lutz}, D. and {Millour}, F. and {Netzer}, H. and {Ott}, T. and {Paumard}, T. and {Perraut}, K. and {Perrin}, G. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Petrucci}, P.~O. and {Pfuhl}, O. and {Prieto}, M.~A. and {Rouan}, D. and {Sanchez-Bermudez}, J. and {Shangguan}, J. and {Shimizu}, T. and {Schartmann}, M. and {Stadler}, J. and {Sternberg}, A. and {Straub}, O. and {Straubmeier}, C. and {Sturm}, E. and {Tacconi}, L.~J. and {Tristram}, K.~R.~W. and {Vermot}, P. and {von Fellenberg}, S. and {Waisberg}, I. and {Widmann}, F. and {Woillez}, J.},\n title = \"{The central parsec of NGC 3783: a rotating broad emission line region, asymmetric hot dust structure, and compact coronal line region}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, quasars: individual: NGC 3783, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2021,\n month = apr,\n volume = {648},\n eid = {A117},\n pages = {A117},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202040061},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2102.00068},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...648A.117G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{netzer2020,\n author = {{Netzer}, Hagai},\n title = \"{Testing broad-line region models with reverberation mapping}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: actives, quasars: general, galaxies: nuclei, quasars: supermassive black holes, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = may,\n volume = {494},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1611-1621},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa767},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2003.07660},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.1611N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{wandel1999,\n author = {{Wandel}, A. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Malkan}, M.~A.},\n title = \"{Central Masses and Broad-Line Region Sizes of Active Galactic Nuclei. I. Comparing the Photoionization and Reverberation Techniques}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {BLACK HOLE PHYSICS, GALAXIES: ACTIVE, GALAXIES: NUCLEI, GALAXIES: SEYFERT, GALAXIES: QUASARS: EMISSION LINES, GALAXIES: QUASARS: GENERAL, Black Hole Physics, Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Nuclei, Galaxies: Seyfert, Galaxies: Quasars: Emission Lines, Galaxies: Quasars: General, Astrophysics},\n year = 1999,\n month = dec,\n volume = {526},\n number = {2},\n pages = {579-591},\n doi = {10.1086/308017},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9905224},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...526..579W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{netzer2022,\n author = {{Netzer}, Hagai},\n title = \"{Continuum reverberation mapping and a new lag-luminosity relationship for AGN}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = jan,\n volume = {509},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2637-2646},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stab3133},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2110.05512},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.509.2637N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{gnat2012,\n author = {{Gnat}, Orly and {Ferland}, Gary J.},\n title = \"{Ion-by-ion Cooling Efficiencies}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {atomic processes, ISM: general, plasmas, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2012,\n month = mar,\n volume = {199},\n number = {1},\n eid = {20},\n pages = {20},\n doi = {10.1088/0067-0049/199/1/20},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1111.6980},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJS..199...20G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{seyfert1943,\n author = {{Seyfert}, Carl K.},\n title = \"{Nuclear Emission in Spiral Nebulae.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n year = 1943,\n month = jan,\n volume = {97},\n pages = {28},\n doi = {10.1086/144488},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1943ApJ....97...28S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{elvis2000,\n author = {{Elvis}, Martin},\n title = \"{A Structure for Quasars}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Quasars: Absorption Lines, Galaxies: Quasars: General, Astrophysics},\n year = 2000,\n month = dec,\n volume = {545},\n number = {1},\n pages = {63-76},\n doi = {10.1086/317778},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0008064},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...545...63E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{baldwin2004,\n author = {{Baldwin}, J.~A. and {Ferland}, G.~J. and {Korista}, K.~T. and {Hamann}, F. and {LaCluyz{\\'e}}, A.},\n title = \"{The Origin of Fe II Emission in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Quasars: Emission Lines, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = nov,\n volume = {615},\n number = {2},\n pages = {610-624},\n doi = {10.1086/424683},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0407404},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...615..610B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@BOOK{mihalas1978book,\n author = {{Mihalas}, Dimitri},\n title = \"{Stellar atmospheres}\",\n year = 1978,\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978stat.book.....M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System},\n publisher = {2nd ed.; San Francisco, CA.; W. H. Freeman and Co.}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{panda2018,\n author = {{Panda}, Swayamtrupta and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Adhikari}, Tek P. and {Hryniewicz}, Krzysztof and {Wildy}, Conor and {Kuraszkiewicz}, Joanna and {{\\'S}niegowska}, Marzena},\n title = \"{Modeling of the Quasar Main Sequence in the Optical Plane}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2018,\n month = oct,\n volume = {866},\n number = {2},\n eid = {115},\n pages = {115},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aae209},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1806.08571},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...866..115P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{fonseca2020,\n author = {{Fonseca Alvarez}, Gloria and {Trump}, Jonathan R. and {Homayouni}, Y. and\n {Grier}, C.~J. and {Shen}, Yue and {Horne}, Keith and\n {Li}, Jennifer I. -Hsiu and {Brandt}, W.~N. and {Ho}, Luis C. and\n {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Schneider}, D.~P.},\n title = \"{The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: The H{\\ensuremath{\\beta}} Radius-Luminosity Relation}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active galaxies, Galaxy nuclei, Quasars, Supermassive black holes, 17, 609, 1319, 1663, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = aug,\n volume = {899},\n number = {1},\n eid = {73},\n pages = {73},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aba001},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1910.10719},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...899...73F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Semenov2003,\n author = {{Semenov}, D. and {Henning}, Th. and {Helling}, Ch. and {Ilgner}, M. and\n {Sedlmayr}, E.},\n title = \"{Rosseland and Planck mean opacities for protoplanetary discs}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, hydrodynamics, atomic processes, molecular processes, stars: planetary systems: protoplanetary discs, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = nov,\n volume = {410},\n pages = {611-621},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20031279},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0308344},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...410..611S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{rozanska1999,\n author = {{R{\\'o}{\\.z}a{\\'n}ska}, A. and {Czerny}, B. and {{\\.Z}ycki}, P.~T. and\n {Pojma{\\'n}ski}, G.},\n title = \"{Vertical structure of accretion discs with hot coronae in active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {ACCRETION, ACCRETION DISCS, LINE: FORMATION, LINE: PROFILES, GALAXIES: ACTIVE, GALAXIES: NUCLEI, QUASARS: EMISSION LINES, Astrophysics},\n year = 1999,\n month = may,\n volume = {305},\n number = {3},\n pages = {481-491},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02425.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9811380},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.305..481R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{higginbottom2014,\n author = {{Higginbottom}, Nick and {Proga}, Daniel and {Knigge}, Christian and\n {Long}, Knox S. and {Matthews}, James H. and {Sim}, Stuart A.},\n title = \"{Line-driven Disk Winds in Active Galactic Nuclei: The Critical Importance of Ionization and Radiative Transfer}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, methods: numerical, quasars: general, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = jul,\n volume = {789},\n number = {1},\n eid = {19},\n pages = {19},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/19},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1402.1849},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...789...19H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{bentz2013,\n author = {{Bentz}, Misty C. and {Denney}, Kelly D. and {Grier}, Catherine J. and {Barth}, Aaron J. and {Peterson}, Bradley M. and {Vestergaard}, Marianne and {Bennert}, Vardha N. and {Canalizo}, Gabriela and {De Rosa}, Gisella and {Filippenko}, Alexei V. and {Gates}, Elinor L. and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Li}, Weidong and {Malkan}, Matthew A. and {Pogge}, Richard W. and {Stern}, Daniel and {Treu}, Tommaso and {Woo}, Jong-Hak},\n title = \"{The Low-luminosity End of the Radius-Luminosity Relationship for Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: photometry, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = apr,\n volume = {767},\n number = {2},\n eid = {149},\n pages = {149},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/149},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1303.1742},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767..149B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{murray1995,\n author = {{Murray}, N. and {Chiang}, J. and {Grossman}, S.~A. and {Voit}, G.~M.},\n title = \"{Accretion Disk Winds from Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {ACCRETION, ACCRETION DISKS, GALAXIES: NUCLEI, GALAXIES: QUASARS: ABSORPTION LINES},\n year = 1995,\n month = oct,\n volume = {451},\n pages = {498},\n doi = {10.1086/176238},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...451..498M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{campitiello2019,\n author = {{Campitiello}, Samuele and {Celotti}, Annalisa and {Ghisellini}, Gabriele and {Sbarrato}, Tullia},\n title = \"{Black hole mass and spin estimates of the most distant quasars}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, quasars: general, black hole physics, accretion, accretion disks, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2019,\n month = may,\n volume = {625},\n eid = {A23},\n pages = {A23},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201834167},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1809.00010},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...625A..23C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{laor1989,\n author = {{Laor}, Ari and {Netzer}, Hagai},\n title = \"{Massive thin accretion discs. - I. Calculated spectra.}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Accretion Disks, Active Galactic Nuclei, Astronomical Spectroscopy, Computational Astrophysics, Eddington Approximation, Electron Scattering, Optical Thickness, Radiation Pressure, Radiative Transfer, Surface Temperature, Astrophysics},\n year = 1989,\n month = jun,\n volume = {238},\n pages = {897-916},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/238.3.897},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989MNRAS.238..897L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{cracco2016,\n author = {{Cracco}, V. and {Ciroi}, S. and {Berton}, M. and {Di Mille}, F. and {Foschini}, L. and {La Mura}, G. and {Rafanelli}, P.},\n title = \"{A spectroscopic analysis of a sample of narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {line: profiles, techniques: spectroscopic, galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = oct,\n volume = {462},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1256-1280},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw1689},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1607.03438},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.1256C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{veron_cetty2001,\n author = {{V{\\'e}ron-Cetty}, M. -P. and {V{\\'e}ron}, P. and {Gon{\\c{c}}alves}, A.~C.},\n title = \"{A spectrophotometric atlas of Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: SEYFERT, Astrophysics},\n year = 2001,\n month = jun,\n volume = {372},\n pages = {730-754},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20010489},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0104151},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...372..730V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{laor1997,\n author = {{Laor}, Ari and {Jannuzi}, Buell T. and {Green}, Richard F. and {Boroson}, Todd A.},\n title = \"{The Ultraviolet Properties of the Narrow-Line Quasar I Zw 1}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Quasars: Absorption Lines, Galaxies: Quasars: Emission Lines, quasars: individual (I Zwicky 1), Ultraviolet: Galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 1997,\n month = nov,\n volume = {489},\n number = {2},\n pages = {656-671},\n doi = {10.1086/304816},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9706264},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...489..656L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{moran1996,\n author = {{Moran}, Edward C. and {Halpern}, Jules P. and {Helfand}, David J.},\n title = \"{Classification of IRAS-selected X-Ray Galaxies in the ROSAT All-Sky Survey}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: SEYFERT, GALAXIES: ACTIVE, INFRARED: GALAXIES, X-RAYS: GALAXIES},\n year = 1996,\n month = oct,\n volume = {106},\n pages = {341},\n doi = {10.1086/192341},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJS..106..341M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{reissl2018,\n author = {{Reissl}, Stefan and {Klessen}, Ralf S. and {Mac Low}, Mordecai-Mark and\n {Pellegrini}, Eric W.},\n title = \"{Spectral shifting strongly constrains molecular cloud disruption by radiation pressure on dust}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: star clusters: general, ISM: kinematics and dynamics, ISM: clouds, radiation: dynamics, radiative transfer, scattering, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = mar,\n volume = {611},\n eid = {A70},\n pages = {A70},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201731698},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1710.02854},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...611A..70R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Quera2023,\n author = {{Quera-Bofarull}, Arnau and {Done}, Chris and {Lacey}, Cedric G. and {Nomura}, Mariko and {Ohsuga}, Ken},\n title = \"{QWIND3: UV line-driven accretion disc wind models for AGN feedback}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, radiative transfer, galaxies: active, quasars: general, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = jan,\n volume = {518},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2693-2711},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac3171},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2111.02742},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.2693Q},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{GRAVITY_4_objects_2024,\n author = {{GRAVITY Collaboration} and {Amorim}, A. and {Bourdarot}, G. and {Brandner}, W. and {Cao}, Y. and {Cl{\\'e}net}, Y. and {Davies}, R. and {de Zeeuw}, P.~T. and {Dexter}, J. and {Drescher}, A. and {Eckart}, A. and {Eisenhauer}, F. and {Fabricius}, M. and {Feuchtgruber}, H. and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, N.~M. and {Garcia}, P.~J.~V. and {Genzel}, R. and {Gillessen}, S. and {Gratadour}, D. and {H{\\\"o}nig}, S. and {Kishimoto}, M. and {Lacour}, S. and {Lutz}, D. and {Millour}, F. and {Netzer}, H. and {Ott}, T. and {Paumard}, T. and {Perraut}, K. and {Perrin}, G. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Petrucci}, P.~O. and {Pfuhl}, O. and {Prieto}, M.~A. and {Rabien}, S. and {Rouan}, D. and {Santos}, D.~J.~D. and {Shangguan}, J. and {Shimizu}, T. and {Sternberg}, A. and {Straubmeier}, C. and {Sturm}, E. and {Tacconi}, L.~J. and {Tristram}, K.~R.~W. and {Widmann}, F. and {Woillez}, J.},\n title = \"{The size-luminosity relation of local active galactic nuclei from interferometric observations of the broad-line region}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {techniques: interferometric, galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = apr,\n volume = {684},\n eid = {A167},\n pages = {A167},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202348167},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2401.07676},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684A.167G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{CLOUDY2023,\n author = {{Chatzikos}, M. and {Bianchi}, S. and {Camilloni}, F. and {Chakraborty}, P. and {Gunasekera}, C.~M. and {Guzm{\\'a}n}, F. and {Milby}, J.~S. and {Sarkar}, A. and {Shaw}, G. and {van Hoof}, P.~A.~M. and {Ferland}, G.~J.},\n title = \"{The 2023 Release of Cloudy}\",\n journal = {\\rmxaa},\n keywords = {atomic data, galaxies: active, globular clusters: general, molecular data, software: development, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2023,\n month = oct,\n volume = {59},\n pages = {327-343},\n doi = {10.22201/ia.01851101p.2023.59.02.12},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2308.06396},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023RMxAA..59..327C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{naddaf2024,\n author = {{Naddaf}, Mohammad-Hassan and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena},\n title = \"{Covering Factor of the Dust-Driven Broad-Line Region Clouds}\",\n journal = {Universe},\n keywords = {covering factor, broad-line region, active galaxies, dust-driving mechanism, radiation pressure, FRADO model, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jan,\n volume = {10},\n number = {1},\n eid = {29},\n pages = {29},\n doi = {10.3390/universe10010029},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2312.11724},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Univ...10...29N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{li2013,\n author = {{Li}, Yan-Rong and {Wang}, Jian-Min and {Ho}, Luis C. and {Du}, Pu and {Bai}, Jin-Ming},\n title = \"{A Bayesian Approach to Estimate the Size and Structure of the Broad-line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei Using Reverberation Mapping Data}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, methods: data analysis, methods: statistical, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2013,\n month = dec,\n volume = {779},\n number = {2},\n eid = {110},\n pages = {110},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/110},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1310.3907},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...779..110L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{pancoast2011,\n author = {{Pancoast}, Anna and {Brewer}, Brendon J. and {Treu}, Tommaso},\n title = \"{Geometric and Dynamical Models of Reverberation Mapping Data}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, methods: data analysis, methods: statistical, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2011,\n month = apr,\n volume = {730},\n number = {2},\n eid = {139},\n pages = {139},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/139},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1101.4952},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...730..139P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{pancoast2014,\n author = {{Pancoast}, Anna and {Brewer}, Brendon J. and {Treu}, Tommaso and {Park}, Daeseong and {Barth}, Aaron J. and {Bentz}, Misty C. and {Woo}, Jong-Hak},\n title = \"{Modelling reverberation mapping data - II. Dynamical modelling of the Lick AGN Monitoring Project 2008 data set}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = dec,\n volume = {445},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3073-3091},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu1419},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1311.6475},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.3073P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{nicastro2003,\n author = {{Nicastro}, Fabrizio and {Martocchia}, Andrea and {Matt}, Giorgio},\n title = \"{The Lack of Broad-Line Regions in Low Accretion Rate Active Galactic Nuclei as Evidence of Their Origin in the Accretion Disk}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Accretion, Accretion Disks, Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Quasars: Emission Lines, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = may,\n volume = {589},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L13-L16},\n doi = {10.1086/375715},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0304128},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...589L..13N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{liu1999,\n author = {{Liu}, B.~F. and {Yuan}, W. and {Meyer}, F. and {Meyer-Hofmeister}, E. and {Xie}, G.~Z.},\n title = \"{Evaporation of Accretion Disks around Black Holes: The Disk-Corona Transition and the Connection to the Advection-dominated Accretion Flow}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {ACCRETION, ACCRETION DISKS, STARS: BINARIES: GENERAL, BLACK HOLE PHYSICS, GALAXIES: NUCLEI, Accretion, Accretion Disks, Stars: Binaries: General, Black Hole Physics, Galaxies: Nuclei, Astrophysics},\n year = 1999,\n month = dec,\n volume = {527},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L17-L20},\n doi = {10.1086/312383},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9911051},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...527L..17L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{liu2022,\n author = {{Liu}, B.~F. and {Qiao}, Erlin},\n title = \"{Accretion around black holes: The geometry and spectra}\",\n journal = {iScience},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2022,\n month = jan,\n volume = {25},\n number = {1},\n pages = {103544},\n doi = {10.1016/j.isci.2021.103544},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2201.06198},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022iSci...25j3544L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{eracleous2009,\n author = {{Eracleous}, Michael and {Lewis}, Karen T. and {Flohic}, H{\\'e}l{\\`e}ne M.~L.~G.},\n title = \"{Double-peaked emission lines as a probe of the broad-line regions of active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\nar},\n year = 2009,\n month = jul,\n volume = {53},\n number = {7-10},\n pages = {133-139},\n doi = {10.1016/j.newar.2009.07.005},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009NewAR..53..133E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{cao2024,\n author = {{Cao}, Shulei and {Mandal}, Amit Kumar and {Zaja{\\v{c}}ek}, Michal and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Ratra}, Bharat},\n title = \"{Standardizing reverberation-mapped H$\\alpha$ and H$\\beta$ active galactic nuclei using radius--luminosity relations involving monochromatic and broad H$\\alpha$ luminosities}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, High Energy Physics - Theory},\n year = 2024,\n month = dec,\n eid = {arXiv:2412.19665},\n pages = {arXiv:2412.19665},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2412.19665},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2412.19665},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241219665C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{cao2022,\n author = {{Cao}, Shulei and {Zaja{\\v{c}}ek}, Michal and {Panda}, Swayamtrupta and {Mart{\\'\\i}nez-Aldama}, Mary Loli and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Ratra}, Bharat},\n title = \"{Standardizing reverberation-measured C IV time-lag quasars, and using them with standardized Mg II quasars to constrain cosmological parameters}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {quasars: emission lines, cosmological parameters, cosmology: observations, dark energy, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, High Energy Physics - Theory},\n year = 2022,\n month = oct,\n volume = {516},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1721-1740},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac2325},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2205.15552},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.1721C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{khadka2021,\n author = {{Khadka}, Narayan and {Yu}, Zhefu and {Zaja{\\v{c}}ek}, Michal and {Martinez-Aldama}, Mary Loli and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Ratra}, Bharat},\n title = \"{Standardizing reverberation-measured Mg II time-lag quasars, by using the radius-luminosity relation, and constraining cosmological model parameters}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {cosmological parameters, cosmology: observations, dark energy, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, High Energy Physics - Theory},\n year = 2021,\n month = dec,\n volume = {508},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4722-4737},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stab2807},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2106.11136},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508.4722K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{GravityColl2018,\n author = {{Gravity Collaboration} and {Sturm}, E. and {Dexter}, J. and\n {Pfuhl}, O. and {Stock}, M.~R. and {Davies}, R.~I. and {Lutz}, D. and\n {Cl{\\'e}net}, Y. and {Eckart}, A. and {Eisenhauer}, F. and\n {Genzel}, R. and {Gratadour}, D. and {H{\\\"o}nig}, S.~F. and\n {Kishimoto}, M. and {Lacour}, S. and {Millour}, F. and {Netzer}, H. and\n {Perrin}, G. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Petrucci}, P.~O. and\n {Rouan}, D. and {Waisberg}, I. and {Woillez}, J. and {Amorim}, A. and\n {Brandner}, W. and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, N.~M. and\n {Garcia}, P.~J.~V. and {Gillessen}, S. and {Ott}, T. and {Paumard}, T. and\n {Perraut}, K. and {Scheithauer}, S. and {Straubmeier}, C. and\n {Tacconi}, L.~J. and {Widmann}, F.},\n title = \"{Spatially resolved rotation of the broad-line region of a quasar at sub-parsec scale}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = nov,\n volume = {563},\n number = {7733},\n pages = {657-660},\n doi = {10.1038/s41586-018-0731-9},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1811.11195},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.563..657G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{osterbrock1978,\n author = {{Osterbrock}, D.~E.},\n title = \"{Physical state of the emission-line region.}\",\n journal = {\\physscr},\n keywords = {Emission Spectra, Galactic Nuclei, Ionized Gases, Radio Galaxies, Seyfert Galaxies, Abundance, Astronomical Models, Astrophysics, Cosmic Dust, Electron Density (Concentration), Electron Energy, Energy Transfer, Gas Ionization, Line Spectra, Astrophysics, Emission Lines:Radio Galaxies, Emission Lines:Seyfert Galaxies, Interstellar Gas:Seyfert Galaxies},\n year = 1978,\n month = mar,\n volume = {17},\n pages = {285-292},\n doi = {10.1088/0031-8949/17/3/024},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978PhyS...17..285O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{capriotti1980,\n author = {{Capriotti}, E. and {Foltz}, C. and {Byard}, P.},\n title = \"{The dynamics of the broad-line-emitting regions of active galactic nuclei and quasars. I. Broad-line profiles.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Line Spectra, Quasars, Spectral Line Width, Emission Spectra, Seyfert Galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 1980,\n month = nov,\n volume = {241},\n pages = {903-909},\n doi = {10.1086/158404},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ApJ...241..903C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{peterson1998,\n author = {{Peterson}, Bradley M. and {Wanders}, Ignaz and {Horne}, Keith and\n {Collier}, Stefan and {Alexander}, Tal and {Kaspi}, Shai and\n {Maoz}, Dan},\n title = \"{On Uncertainties in Cross-Correlation Lags and the Reality of Wavelength-dependent Continuum Lags in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {PASA},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: ACTIVE, GALAXIES: SEYFERT, METHODS: DATA ANALYSIS, Astrophysics},\n year = \"1998\",\n month = \"Jun\",\n volume = {110},\n number = {748},\n pages = {660-670},\n doi = {10.1086/316177},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9802103},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998PASP..110..660P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{mathis1977,\n author = {{Mathis}, J.~S. and {Rumpl}, W. and {Nordsieck}, K.~H.},\n title = \"{The size distribution of interstellar grains.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Cosmic Dust, Interstellar Extinction, Interstellar Matter, Particle Size Distribution, Enstatite, Graphite, Magnetite, Olivine, Polarization Characteristics, Ultraviolet Astronomy, Astrophysics},\n year = 1977,\n month = oct,\n volume = {217},\n pages = {425-433},\n doi = {10.1086/155591},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ApJ...217..425M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{rollig2013,\n author = {{R{\\\"o}llig}, M. and {Szczerba}, R. and {Ossenkopf}, V. and\n {Gl{\\\"u}ck}, C.},\n title = \"{Full SED fitting with the KOSMA-{\\ensuremath{\\tau}} PDR code. I. Dust modelling}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {astrochemistry, radiative transfer, methods: numerical, photon-dominated region (PDR), ISM: molecules, infrared: ISM, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Galaxy Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = jan,\n volume = {549},\n eid = {A85},\n pages = {A85},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201118190},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1211.3546},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...549A..85R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{hopkins2004,\n author = {{Hopkins}, Philip F. and {Strauss}, Michael A. and {Hall}, Patrick B. and {Richards}, Gordon T. and {Cooper}, Ariana S. and {Schneider}, Donald P. and {Vanden Berk}, Daniel E. and {Jester}, Sebastian and {Brinkmann}, J. and {Szokoly}, Gyula P.},\n title = \"{Dust Reddening in Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasars}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {ISM: Dust, Extinction, Galaxies: Quasars: General, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = sep,\n volume = {128},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1112-1123},\n doi = {10.1086/423291},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0406293},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....128.1112H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@ARTICLE{everett2005,\n author = {{Everett}, John E.},\n title = \"{Radiative Transfer and Acceleration in Magnetocentrifugal Winds}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Jets, Hydrodynamics, Magnetohydrodynamics: MHD, Galaxies: Quasars: General, Radiative Transfer, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = oct,\n volume = {631},\n number = {2},\n pages = {689-706},\n doi = {10.1086/432678},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0506321},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...631..689E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{gallagher2015,\n author = {{Gallagher}, S.~C. and {Everett}, J.~E. and {Abado}, M.~M. and {Keating}, S.~K.},\n title = \"{Investigating the structure of the windy torus in quasars}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {MHD, galaxies: active, quasars: general, galaxies: Seyfert, infrared: galaxies, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = aug,\n volume = {451},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2991-3000},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv1126},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1505.04219},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.2991G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{gallagher2007,\n author = {{Gallagher}, S.~C. and {Everett}, J.~E.},\n title = \"{Stratified Quasar Winds: Integrating X-ray and Infrared Views of Broad Absorption-line Quasars}\",\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n booktitle = {The Central Engine of Active Galactic Nuclei},\n year = 2007,\n editor = {{Ho}, L.~C. and {Wang}, J. -W.},\n series = {Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series},\n volume = {373},\n month = oct,\n pages = {305},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0701076},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ASPC..373..305G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{giang2020,\n author = {{Chau Giang}, Nguyen and {Hoang}, Thiem},\n title = \"{Modelling Grain Alignment, Disruption, Extinction and Polarization of Active Galactic Nuclei by Dust Grains subject to Radiative Torques}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2020,\n month = sep,\n eid = {arXiv:2009.06958},\n pages = {arXiv:2009.06958},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2009.06958},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv200906958C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{gaskell2004,\n author = {{Gaskell}, C. Martin and {Goosmann}, Ren{\\'e} W. and {Antonucci}, Robert R.~J. and {Whysong}, David H.},\n title = \"{The Nuclear Reddening Curve for Active Galactic Nuclei and the Shape of the Infrared to X-Ray Spectral Energy Distribution}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {ISM: Dust, Extinction, Galaxies: Active, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = nov,\n volume = {616},\n number = {1},\n pages = {147-156},\n doi = {10.1086/423885},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0309595},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...616..147G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{richards2003,\n author = {{Richards}, Gordon T. and {Hall}, Patrick B. and {Vanden Berk}, Daniel E. and {Strauss}, Michael A. and {Schneider}, Donald P. and {Weinstein}, Michael A. and {Reichard}, Timothy A. and {York}, Donald G. and {Knapp}, G.~R. and {Fan}, Xiaohui and {Ivezi{\\'c}}, {\\v{Z}}eljko and {Brinkmann}, J. and {Budav{\\'a}ri}, Tam{\\'a}s and {Csabai}, Istv{\\'a}n and {Nichol}, R.~C.},\n title = \"{Red and Reddened Quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Quasars: Absorption Lines, Galaxies: Quasars: Emission Lines, Galaxies: Quasars: General, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = sep,\n volume = {126},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1131-1147},\n doi = {10.1086/377014},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0305305},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AJ....126.1131R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{zafar2015,\n author = {{Zafar}, T. and {M{\\o}ller}, P. and {Watson}, D. and {Fynbo}, J.~P.~U. and {Krogager}, J. -K. and {Zafar}, N. and {Saturni}, F.~G. and {Geier}, S. and {Venemans}, B.~P.},\n title = \"{Extinction curve template for intrinsically reddened quasars}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: high-redshift, quasars: general, dust, extinction, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = dec,\n volume = {584},\n eid = {A100},\n pages = {A100},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201526570},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1510.01708},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...584A.100Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{GRAVITY2021,\n author = {{Gravity Collaboration} and {Amorim}, A. and {Baub{\\\"o}ck}, M. and {Brandner}, W. and {Bolzer}, M. and {Cl{\\'e}net}, Y. and {Davies}, R. and {de Zeeuw}, P.~T. and {Dexter}, J. and {Drescher}, A. and {Eckart}, A. and {Eisenhauer}, F. and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, N.~M. and {Gao}, F. and {Garcia}, P.~J.~V. and {Genzel}, R. and {Gillessen}, S. and {Gratadour}, D. and {H{\\\"o}nig}, S. and {Kaltenbrunner}, D. and {Kishimoto}, M. and {Lacour}, S. and {Lutz}, D. and {Millour}, F. and {Netzer}, H. and {Ott}, T. and {Paumard}, T. and {Perraut}, K. and {Perrin}, G. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Petrucci}, P.~O. and {Pfuhl}, O. and {Prieto}, M.~A. and {Rouan}, D. and {Sanchez-Bermudez}, J. and {Shangguan}, J. and {Shimizu}, T. and {Schartmann}, M. and {Stadler}, J. and {Sternberg}, A. and {Straub}, O. and {Straubmeier}, C. and {Sturm}, E. and {Tacconi}, L.~J. and {Tristram}, K.~R.~W. and {Vermot}, P. and {von Fellenberg}, S. and {Waisberg}, I. and {Widmann}, F. and {Woillez}, J.},\n title = \"{The central parsec of NGC 3783: a rotating broad emission line region, asymmetric hot dust structure, and compact coronal line region}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, quasars: individual: NGC 3783, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2021,\n month = apr,\n volume = {648},\n eid = {A117},\n pages = {A117},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202040061},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2102.00068},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...648A.117G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{muller2022,\n author = {{M{\\\"u}ller}, Ana Laura and {Naddaf}, Mohammad-Hassan and {Zaja{\\v{c}}ek}, Michal and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Araudo}, Anabella and {Karas}, Vladim{\\'\\i}r},\n title = \"{Non-thermal emission from fall-back clouds in the Broad-Line Region of Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = apr,\n eid = {arXiv:2204.05361},\n pages = {arXiv:2204.05361},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2204.05361},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220405361M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{pietrini2019,\n author = {{Pietrini}, P. and {Torricelli-Ciamponi}, G. and {Risaliti}, G.},\n title = \"{X-ray occultations in active galactic nuclei: distribution in size of orbiting clouds and total mass content in the cloud ensemble}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, X-rays: galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = aug,\n volume = {628},\n eid = {A26},\n pages = {A26},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201935632},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...628A..26P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{mccourt2018,\n author = {{McCourt}, Michael and {Oh}, S. Peng and {O'Leary}, Ryan and {Madigan}, Ann-Marie},\n title = \"{A characteristic scale for cold gas}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {MHD, plasmas, ISM: clouds, Galaxy: centre, Galaxy: halo, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = feb,\n volume = {473},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5407-5431},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx2687},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1610.01164},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.5407M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{torricelli2014,\n author = {{Torricelli-Ciamponi}, G. and {Pietrini}, P. and {Risaliti}, G. and {Salvati}, M.},\n title = \"{Search for X-ray occultations in active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, X-rays: galaxies, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2014,\n month = aug,\n volume = {442},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2116-2130},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu969},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1405.4660},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.442.2116T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{risaliti2011,\n author = {{Risaliti}, G. and {Nardini}, E. and {Salvati}, M. and {Elvis}, M. and {Fabbiano}, G. and {Maiolino}, R. and {Pietrini}, P. and {Torricelli-Ciamponi}, G.},\n title = \"{X-ray absorption by broad-line region clouds in Mrk 766}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: individual: Mrk 766, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = jan,\n volume = {410},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1027-1035},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17503.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1008.5067},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.410.1027R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{waters2019,\n author = {{Waters}, Tim and {Proga}, Daniel},\n title = \"{Non-isobaric Thermal Instability}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: halos, galaxies: nuclei, instabilities, ISM: clouds, plasmas, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = apr,\n volume = {875},\n number = {2},\n eid = {158},\n pages = {158},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab10e1},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1810.11500},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...875..158W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{gronke2020,\n author = {{Gronke}, Max and {Oh}, S. Peng},\n title = \"{Is multiphase gas cloudy or misty?}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {hydrodynamics, ISM: clouds, ISM: structure, Galaxy: halo, Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics},\n year = 2020,\n month = may,\n volume = {494},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L27-L31},\n doi = {10.1093/mnrasl/slaa033},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1912.07808},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494L..27G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{muijres2011,\n author = {{Muijres}, L.~E. and {de Koter}, A. and {Vink}, J.~S. and {Krti{\\v{c}}ka}, J. and {Kub{\\'a}t}, J. and {Langer}, N.},\n title = \"{Predictions of the effect of clumping on the wind properties of O-type stars}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {radiative transfer, stars: early-type, stars: massive, stars: mass-loss, stars: winds, outflows},\n year = 2011,\n month = feb,\n volume = {526},\n eid = {A32},\n pages = {A32},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201014290},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...526A..32M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{ventura2012,\n author = {{Ventura}, P. and {di Criscienzo}, M. and {Schneider}, R. and {Carini}, R. and {Valiante}, R. and {D'Antona}, F. and {Gallerani}, S. and {Maiolino}, R. and {Tornamb{\\'e}}, A.},\n title = \"{The transition from carbon dust to silicate production in low-metallicity asymptotic giant branch and super-asymptotic giant branch stars}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {stars: abundances, stars: AGB and post-AGB, ISM: abundances, dust, extinction},\n year = 2012,\n month = feb,\n volume = {420},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1442-1456},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20129.x},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.420.1442V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{Goldman2017,\n author = {{Goldman}, Steven R. and {van Loon}, Jacco Th. and {Zijlstra}, Albert A. and {Green}, James A. and {Wood}, Peter R. and {Nanni}, Ambra and {Imai}, Hiroshi and {Whitelock}, Patricia A. and {Matsuura}, Mikako and {Groenewegen}, Martin A.~T. and {G{\\'o}mez}, Jos{\\'e} F.},\n title = \"{The wind speeds, dust content, and mass-loss rates of evolved AGB and RSG stars at varying metallicity}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {masers, stars: AGB and post-AGB, stars: mass-loss, supergiants, stars: winds, outflows, Magellanic Clouds, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = feb,\n volume = {465},\n number = {1},\n pages = {403-433},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw2708},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1610.05761},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.SR},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465..403G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{elvis2002,\n author = {{Elvis}, Martin and {Marengo}, Massimo and {Karovska}, Margarita},\n title = \"{Smoking Quasars: A New Source for Cosmic Dust}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {ISM: Dust, Extinction, Galaxies: Abundances, Galaxies: Intergalactic Medium, Galaxies: Quasars: General, Astrophysics},\n year = 2002,\n month = mar,\n volume = {567},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L107-L110},\n doi = {10.1086/340006},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0202002},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...567L.107E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{czerny2011,\n author = {{Czerny}, B. and {Hryniewicz}, K.},\n title = \"{The origin of the broad line region in active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = jan,\n volume = {525},\n eid = {L8},\n pages = {L8},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201016025},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1010.6201},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...525L...8C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{netzer2015,\n author = {{Netzer}, Hagai},\n title = \"{Revisiting the Unified Model of Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {ARA\\&A},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = aug,\n volume = {53},\n pages = {365-408},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122302},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1505.00811},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ARA&A..53..365N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{czerny2015,\n author = {{Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Modzelewska}, Justyna and\n {Petrogalli}, Francesco and {Pych}, Wojtek and {Adhikari}, Tek P. and\n {{\\.Z}ycki}, Piotr T. and {Hryniewicz}, Krzysztof and\n {Krupa}, Magdalena and {{\\'S}wie{\\c{t}}o{\\'n}}, Agnieszka and\n {Niko{\\l}ajuk}, Marek},\n title = \"{The dust origin of the Broad Line Region and the model consequences for AGN unification scheme}\",\n journal = {Advances in Space Research},\n keywords = {Quasars, Broad Line Region, Dust, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = \"2015\",\n month = \"Apr\",\n volume = {55},\n number = {7},\n pages = {1806-1815},\n doi = {10.1016/j.asr.2015.01.004},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1409.7312},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AdSpR..55.1806C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{czerny2016,\n author = {{Czerny}, Bozena and {Du}, Pu and {Wang}, Jian-Min and {Karas}, Vladimir},\n title = \"{A Test of the Formation Mechanism of the Broad Line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {galaxies: emission lines, galaxies: active, galaxies: individual:: NLR-BLR, quasars: emission lines, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = \"2016\",\n month = \"Nov\",\n volume = {832},\n number = {1},\n eid = {15},\n pages = {15},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/15},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1610.00420},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...832...15C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{czerny2017,\n author = {{Czerny}, B. and {Li}, Yan-Rong and {Hryniewicz}, K. and {Panda}, S. and\n {Wildy}, C. and {Sniegowska}, M. and {Wang}, J. -M. and\n {Sredzinska}, J. and {Karas}, V.},\n title = \"{Failed Radiatively Accelerated Dusty Outflow Model of the Broad Line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei. I. Analytical Solution}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, line: formation, line: profiles, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = \"2017\",\n month = \"Sep\",\n volume = {846},\n number = {2},\n eid = {154},\n pages = {154},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aa8810},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1706.07958},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...846..154C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{czernyReview2019,\n author = {{Czerny}, Bozena},\n title = \"{Modelling broad emission lines in active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {Open Astronomy},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Emission Lines, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = dec,\n volume = {28},\n number = {1},\n pages = {200-212},\n doi = {10.1515/astro-2019-0018},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1908.00742},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019OAst...28..200C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{brotherton1994,\n author = {{Brotherton}, M.~S. and {Wills}, Beverley J. and {Steidel}, Charles C. and {Sargent}, Wallace L.~W.},\n title = \"{Statistics of QSO Broad Emission-Line Profiles. II. The C IV lambda 1549, C iii] lambda 1909, and MG II lambda 2798 Lines}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Carbon, Emission Spectra, Line Spectra, Magnesium, Quasars, Radio Galaxies, Kinematics, Radio Emission, Red Shift, Spectral Line Width, Astrophysics, LINE: PROFILES, GALAXIES: QUASARS: GENERAL, GALAXIES: QUASARS: EMISSION LINES, RADIO CONTINUUM: GALAXIES},\n year = 1994,\n month = mar,\n volume = {423},\n pages = {131},\n doi = {10.1086/173794},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...423..131B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{horne1991,\n author = {{Horne}, Keith and {Welsh}, William F. and {Peterson}, Bradley M.},\n title = \"{Echo Mapping of Broad H beta Emission in NGC 5548}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Emission Spectra, H Beta Line, Seyfert Galaxies, Astronomical Spectroscopy, Computerized Simulation, Line Spectra, Transfer Functions, Astrophysics, GALAXIES: INDIVIDUAL NGC NUMBER: NGC 5548, GALAXIES: SEYFERT},\n year = 1991,\n month = jan,\n volume = {367},\n pages = {L5},\n doi = {10.1086/185919},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...367L...5H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{krolik1995,\n author = {{Krolik}, Julian H. and {Done}, Christine},\n title = \"{Reverberation Mapping by Regularized Linear Inversion}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Astronomical Maps, Astronomical Models, Mapping, Maximum Entropy Method, Reverberation, Seyfert Galaxies, Ultraviolet Astronomy, Computerized Simulation, Light Curve, Line Spectra, Mathematical Models, Signal To Noise Ratios, Ultraviolet Spectra, Astronomy, GALAXIES: INDIVIDUAL NGC NUMBER: NGC 5548, GALAXIES: SEYFERT, METHODS: NUMERICAL},\n year = 1995,\n month = feb,\n volume = {440},\n pages = {166},\n doi = {10.1086/175258},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...440..166K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{collin2006,\n author = {{Collin}, S. and {Kawaguchi}, T. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Vestergaard}, M.},\n title = \"{Systematic effects in measurement of black hole masses by emission-line reverberation of active galactic nuclei: Eddington ratio and inclination}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: quasars: general, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = sep,\n volume = {456},\n number = {1},\n pages = {75-90},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20064878},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0603460},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...456...75C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{kaspi2000,\n author = {{Kaspi}, Shai and {Smith}, Paul S. and {Netzer}, Hagai and {Maoz}, Dan and {Jannuzi}, Buell T. and {Giveon}, Uriel},\n title = \"{Reverberation Measurements for 17 Quasars and the Size-Mass-Luminosity Relations in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: ACTIVE, GALAXIES: QUASARS: EMISSION LINES, GALAXIES: QUASARS: GENERAL, Astrophysics},\n year = 2000,\n month = apr,\n volume = {533},\n number = {2},\n pages = {631-649},\n doi = {10.1086/308704},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9911476},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...533..631K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{sluse2012,\n author = {{Sluse}, D. and {Hutsem{\\'e}kers}, D. and {Courbin}, F. and {Meylan}, G. and {Wambsganss}, J.},\n title = \"{Microlensing of the broad line region in 17 lensed quasars}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: micro, gravitational lensing: strong, line: formation, quasars: general, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Galaxy Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = aug,\n volume = {544},\n eid = {A62},\n pages = {A62},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201219125},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1206.0731},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...544A..62S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{li2021,\n author = {{Li}, Sha-Sha and {Yang}, Sen and {Yang}, Zi-Xu and {Chen}, Yong-Jie and {Songsheng}, Yu-Yang and {Liu}, He-Zhen and {Du}, Pu and {Luo}, Bin and {Yu}, Zhe and {Hu}, Chen and {Jiang}, Bo-Wei and {Bao}, Dong-Wei and {Guo}, Wei-Jian and {Zhang}, Zhi-Xiang and {Li}, Yan-Rong and {Xiao}, Ming and {Lu}, Kai-Xing and {Ho}, Luis C. and {Bai}, Jin-Ming and {Bian}, Wei-Hao and {Aceituno}, Jes{\\'u}s and {Minezaki}, Takeo and {Horne}, Keith and {Kokubo}, Mitsuru and {Wang}, Jian-Min},\n title = \"{Reverberation Mapping of Two Luminous Quasars: The Broad-line Region Structure and Black Hole Mass}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Supermassive black holes, Reverberation mapping, Quasars, 1663, 2019, 1319, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = oct,\n volume = {920},\n number = {1},\n eid = {9},\n pages = {9},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac116e},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2106.05655},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...920....9L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{lu2021,\n author = {{Lu}, Kai-Xing and {Wang}, Jian-Guo and {Zhang}, Zhi-Xiang and {Huang}, Ying-Ke and {Xu}, Liang and {Xin}, Yu-Xin and {Yu}, Xiao-Guang and {Ding}, Xu and {Wang}, De-Qing and {Feng}, Hai-Cheng},\n title = \"{Reverberation Mapping Measurements of Black Hole Masses and Broad-line Region Kinematics in Mrk 817 and NGC 7469}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Seyfert galaxies, Supermassive black holes, Reverberation mapping, Time domain astronomy, 1447, 1663, 2019, 2109, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = sep,\n volume = {918},\n number = {2},\n eid = {50},\n pages = {50},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac0c78},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2106.10589},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...918...50L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{zhang2019,\n author = {{Zhang}, Zhi-Xiang and {Du}, Pu and {Smith}, Paul S. and {Zhao}, Yulin and {Hu}, Chen and {Xiao}, Ming and {Li}, Yan-Rong and {Huang}, Ying-Ke and {Wang}, Kai and {Bai}, Jin-Ming and {Ho}, Luis C. and {Wang}, Jian-Min},\n title = \"{Kinematics of the Broad-line Region of 3C 273 from a 10 yr Reverberation Mapping Campaign}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: individual: 3C 273, galaxies: nuclei, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = may,\n volume = {876},\n number = {1},\n eid = {49},\n pages = {49},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab1099},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1811.03812},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876...49Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{guerras2013,\n author = {{Guerras}, E. and {Mediavilla}, E. and {Jimenez-Vicente}, J. and {Kochanek}, C.~S. and {Mu{\\~n}oz}, J.~A. and {Falco}, E. and {Motta}, V.},\n title = \"{Microlensing of Quasar Broad Emission Lines: Constraints on Broad Line Region Size}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: micro, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = feb,\n volume = {764},\n number = {2},\n eid = {160},\n pages = {160},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/160},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1207.2042},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764..160G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{pancoast2012,\n author = {{Pancoast}, Anna and {Brewer}, Brendon J. and {Treu}, Tommaso and {Barth}, Aaron J. and {Bennert}, Vardha N. and {Canalizo}, Gabriela and {Filippenko}, Alexei V. and {Gates}, Elinor L. and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Li}, Weidong and {Malkan}, Matthew A. and {Sand}, David J. and {Stern}, Daniel and {Woo}, Jong-Hak and {Assef}, Roberto J. and {Bae}, Hyun-Jin and {Buehler}, Tabitha and {Cenko}, S. Bradley and {Clubb}, Kelsey I. and {Cooper}, Michael C. and {Diamond-Stanic}, Aleksandar M. and {Hiner}, Kyle D. and {H{\\\"o}nig}, Sebastian F. and {Joner}, Michael D. and {Kandrashoff}, Michael T. and {Laney}, C. David and {Lazarova}, Mariana S. and {Nierenberg}, A.~M. and {Park}, Dawoo and {Silverman}, Jeffrey M. and {Son}, Donghoon and {Sonnenfeld}, Alessandro and {Thorman}, Shawn J. and {Tollerud}, Erik J. and {Walsh}, Jonelle L. and {Walters}, Richard},\n title = \"{The Lick AGN Monitoring Project 2011: Dynamical Modeling of the Broad-line Region in Mrk 50}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: individual: Mrk 50, galaxies: nuclei, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2012,\n month = jul,\n volume = {754},\n number = {1},\n eid = {49},\n pages = {49},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/754/1/49},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1205.3789},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...754...49P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{martinez2020,\n author = {{Mart{\\'\\i}nez-Aldama}, Mary Loli and {Zaja{\\v{c}}ek}, Michal and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Panda}, Swayamtrupta},\n title = \"{Scatter Analysis along the Multidimensional Radius-Luminosity Relations for Reverberation-mapped Mg II Sources}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active galaxies, Supermassive black holes, 17, 1663, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = nov,\n volume = {903},\n number = {2},\n eid = {86},\n pages = {86},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/abb6f8},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2007.09955},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...903...86M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{CzernyTimedelay2019,\n author = {{Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Olejak}, Aleksandra and\n {Ra{\\l}owski}, Mateusz and {Koz{\\l}owski}, Szymon and\n {Loli Martinez Aldama}, Mary and {Zajacek}, Michal and {Pych}, Wojtek and\n {Hryniewicz}, Krzysztof and {Pietrzy{\\'n}ski}, Grzegorz and\n {Sobrino Figaredo}, Catalina and {Haas}, Martin and\n {{\\'S}redzi{\\'n}ska}, Justyna and {Krupa}, Magdalena and\n {Kurcz}, Agnieszka and {Udalski}, Andrzej and {Gorski}, Marek and\n {Karas}, Vladimir and {Panda}, Swayamtrupta and {Sniegowska}, Marzena and\n {Naddaf}, Mohammad-Hassan and {Bilicki}, Maciej and {Sarna}, Marek},\n title = \"{Time Delay Measurement of Mg II Line in CTS C30.10 with SALT}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = jul,\n volume = {880},\n number = {1},\n eid = {46},\n pages = {46},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab2913},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1901.09757},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...880...46C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{grzedzielski2017,\n author = {{Grzedzielski}, Miko{\\l}aj and {Janiuk}, Agnieszka and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Wu}, Qingwen},\n title = \"{Modified viscosity in accretion disks. Application to Galactic black hole binaries, intermediate mass black holes, and active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {black hole physics, X-rays: binaries, X-rays: galaxies, accretion, accretion disks, hydrodynamics, instabilities, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2017,\n month = jul,\n volume = {603},\n eid = {A110},\n pages = {A110},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201629672},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1609.09322},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...603A.110G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{dong2008,\n author = {{Dong}, Xiaobo and {Wang}, Tinggui and {Wang}, Jianguo and\n {Yuan}, Weimin and {Zhou}, Hongyan and {Dai}, Haifeng and {Zhang}, Kai},\n title = \"{Broad-line Balmer decrements in blue active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {MNRAS},\n keywords = {quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, Astrophysics},\n year = \"2008\",\n month = \"Jan\",\n volume = {383},\n number = {2},\n pages = {581-592},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12560.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0710.1458},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.383..581D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{pancoast2014,\n author = {{Pancoast}, Anna and {Brewer}, Brendon J. and {Treu}, Tommaso},\n title = \"{Modelling reverberation mapping data - I. Improved geometric and dynamical models and comparison with cross-correlation results}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: statistical, galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2014,\n month = dec,\n volume = {445},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3055-3072},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu1809},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1407.2941},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.3055P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{tek2016,\n author = {{Adhikari}, T.~P. and {R{\\'o}{\\.z}a{\\'n}ska}, A. and {Czerny}, B. and {Hryniewicz}, K. and {Ferland}, G.~J.},\n title = \"{The Intermediate-line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: individual: NLR-BLR, methods: numerical, quasars: emission lines, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = nov,\n volume = {831},\n number = {1},\n eid = {68},\n pages = {68},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/68},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1606.00284},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...831...68A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{tazaki2020,\n author = {{Tazaki}, Ryo and {Ichikawa}, Kohei and {Kokubo}, Mitsuru},\n title = \"{Dust Destruction by Charging: A Possible Origin of Gray Extinction Curves of Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {16, 99, 1738},\n year = 2020,\n month = apr,\n volume = {892},\n number = {2},\n eid = {84},\n pages = {84},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab7822},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...892...84T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{barvainis1987,\n author = {{Barvainis}, Richard},\n title = \"{Hot Dust and the Near-Infrared Bump in the Continuum Spectra of Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Cosmic Dust, Infrared Spectra, Near Infrared Radiation, Quasars, Thermal Radiation, Black Body Radiation, Continuous Spectra, Graphite, Ultraviolet Radiation, Astrophysics, GALAXIES: NUCLEI, INTERSTELLAR: GRAINS, QUASARS, RADIATION MECHANISMS, SPECTROPHOTOMETRY},\n year = 1987,\n month = sep,\n volume = {320},\n pages = {537},\n doi = {10.1086/165571},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...320..537B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{li2007,\n author = {{Li}, A.},\n title = \"{Dust in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n booktitle = {The Central Engine of Active Galactic Nuclei},\n year = 2007,\n editor = {{Ho}, L.~C. and {Wang}, J. -W.},\n series = {Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series},\n volume = {373},\n month = oct,\n pages = {561},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ASPC..373..561L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{szczerba1997,\n author = {{Szczerba}, R. and {Omont}, A. and {Volk}, K. and {Cox}, P. and\n {Kwok}, S.},\n title = \"{IRAS 22272+5435 - a source with 30 and 21{\\ensuremath{\\mu}}m features.}\",\n journal = {A\\&A},\n keywords = {STARS: AGB, POST-AGB, CIRCUMSTELLAR MATTER, STARS: INDIVIDUAL: IRAS 22272+5435, INFRARED: STARS},\n year = \"1997\",\n month = \"Feb\",\n volume = {317},\n pages = {859-870},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A&A...317..859S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{BlandfordPayne1982,\n author = {{Blandford}, R.~D. and {Payne}, D.~G.},\n title = \"{Hydromagnetic flows from accretion disks and the production of radio jets.}\",\n journal = {MNRAS},\n keywords = {Astrophysics, Energy Transfer, Magnetohydrodynamic Flow, Momentum Transfer, Radio Jets (Astronomy), Stellar Mass Accretion, Angular Momentum, Black Holes (Astronomy), Critical Point, Disks (Shapes), Solar Corona, Astrophysics, Accretion Disks:Magnetohydrodynamics, Accretion Disks:Radio Jets, Radio Galaxies:Radio Jets},\n year = \"1982\",\n month = \"Jun\",\n volume = {199},\n pages = {883-903},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/199.4.883},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982MNRAS.199..883B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{risaliti2010,\n author = {{Risaliti}, G. and {Elvis}, M.},\n title = \"{A non-hydrodynamical model for acceleration of line-driven winds in active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {A\\&A},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, quasars: general, acceleration of particules, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = \"2010\",\n month = \"Jun\",\n volume = {516},\n eid = {A89},\n pages = {A89},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/200912579},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0911.0958},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...516A..89R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{panda2019a,\n author = {{Panda}, Swayamtrupta and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Done}, Chris and {Kubota}, Aya},\n title = \"{CLOUDY View of the Warm Corona}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = apr,\n volume = {875},\n number = {2},\n eid = {133},\n pages = {133},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab11cb},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1901.02962},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...875..133P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{panda2019b,\n author = {{Panda}, Swayamtrupta and {Marziani}, Paola and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena},\n title = \"{The Quasar Main Sequence Explained by the Combination of Eddington Ratio, Metallicity, and Orientation}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = sep,\n volume = {882},\n number = {2},\n eid = {79},\n pages = {79},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab3292},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1905.01729},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...882...79P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{panda2020,\n author = {{Panda}, Swayamtrupta},\n title = \"{Optical Fe II and Near-Infrared Ca II triplet emission in active galaxies: (II) radial sizes from photoionization modelling}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = apr,\n eid = {arXiv:2004.13113},\n pages = {arXiv:2004.13113},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2004.13113},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv200413113P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{panda2020a,\n author = {{Panda}, Swayamtrupta and {Mart{\\'\\i}nez-Aldama}, Mary Loli and {Marinello}, Murilo and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Marziani}, Paola and {Dultzin}, Deborah},\n title = \"{The CaFe Project: Optical Fe II and Near-infrared Ca II Triplet Emission in Active Galaxies. I. Photoionization Modeling}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active galaxies, Quasars, Active galactic nuclei, Supermassive black holes, Accretion, Radiative transfer, Scaling relations, 17, 1319, 16, 1663, 14, 1335, 2031, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = oct,\n volume = {902},\n number = {1},\n eid = {76},\n pages = {76},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/abb5b8},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2004.05201},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...902...76P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{panda2020b,\n author = {{Panda}, S. and {Marziani}, P. and {Czerny}, B.},\n title = \"{Main trends of the quasar main sequence - effect of viewing angle}\",\n journal = {Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso},\n keywords = {Physical data and processes, Accretion, accretion disks, Line: formation, Radiative transfer, Turbulence, Galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = jan,\n volume = {50},\n number = {1},\n pages = {293-308},\n doi = {10.31577/caosp.2020.50.1.293},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1908.07972},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020CoSka..50..293P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{done1996,\n author = {{Done}, Christine and {Krolik}, Julian H.},\n title = \"{Kinematics of the Broad Emission Line Region in NGC 5548}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: INDIVIDUAL NGC NUMBER: NGC 5548, GALAXIES: KINEMATICS AND DYNAMICS, GALAXIES: NUCLEI, GALAXIES: SEYFERT, Astrophysics},\n year = 1996,\n month = may,\n volume = {463},\n pages = {144},\n doi = {10.1086/177230},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9510100},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...463..144D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{honig2019,\n author = {{H{\\\"o}nig}, Sebastian F.},\n title = \"{Redefining the Torus: A Unifying View of AGNs in the Infrared and Submillimeter}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active galaxies, Quasars, Active galactic nuclei, Infrared astronomy, Submillimeter astronomy, Optical interferometry, 17, 1319, 16, 786, 1647, 1168, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = oct,\n volume = {884},\n number = {2},\n eid = {171},\n pages = {171},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab4591},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1909.08639},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...884..171H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{borguet2013,\n author = {{Borguet}, Benoit C.~J. and {Arav}, Nahum and {Edmonds}, Doug and {Chamberlain}, Carter and {Benn}, Chris},\n title = \"{Major Contributor to AGN Feedback: VLT X-shooter Observations of S IV BALQSO Outflows}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: individual: SDSS J1106+1939 SDSS J1512+1119, quasars: absorption lines, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = jan,\n volume = {762},\n number = {1},\n eid = {49},\n pages = {49},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/762/1/49},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1211.6250},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...762...49B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{SS1973,\n author = {{Shakura}, N.~I. and {Sunyaev}, R.~A.},\n title = \"{Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance.}\",\n journal = {A\\&A},\n year = \"1973\",\n month = \"Jun\",\n volume = {500},\n pages = {33-51},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973A&A....24..337S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Hu2008,\n author = {{Hu}, Chen and {Wang}, Jian-Min and {Ho}, Luis C. and {Chen}, Yan-Mei and\n {Zhang}, Hao-Tong and {Bian}, Wei-Hao and {Xue}, Sui-Jian},\n title = \"{A Systematic Analysis of Fe II Emission in Quasars: Evidence for Inflow to the Central Black Hole}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {galaxies: nuclei, line: profiles, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics},\n year = \"2008\",\n month = \"Nov\",\n volume = {687},\n number = {1},\n pages = {78-96},\n doi = {10.1086/591838},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0807.2059},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...687...78H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Wang2017,\n author = {{Wang}, Jian-Min and {Du}, Pu and {Brotherton}, Michael S. and\n {Hu}, Chen and {Songsheng}, Yu-Yang and {Li}, Yan-Rong and {Shi}, Yong and\n {Zhang}, Zhi-Xiang},\n title = \"{Tidally disrupted dusty clumps as the origin of broad emission lines in active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {Nature Astronomy},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = \"2017\",\n month = \"Oct\",\n volume = {1},\n pages = {775-783},\n doi = {10.1038/s41550-017-0264-4},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1710.03419},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017NatAs...1..775W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{collin1999,\n author = {{Collin}, Suzy and {Zahn}, Jean-Paul},\n title = \"{Star formation and evolution in accretion disks around massive black holes.}\",\n journal = {A\\&A},\n keywords = {ACCRETION, ACCRETION DISKS, BLACK HOLE PHYSICS, STARS: SUPERNOVAE: GENERAL, GALAXIES: ACTIVE, GALAXIES: NUCLEI, GALAXIES: QUASARS: GENERAL},\n year = \"1999\",\n month = \"Apr\",\n volume = {344},\n pages = {433-449},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&A...344..433C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{collin2008,\n author = {{Collin}, S. and {Zahn}, J. -P.},\n title = \"{Star formation in accretion discs: from the Galactic center to active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {A\\&A},\n keywords = {galaxies: quasars: general, Galaxy: center, accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics},\n year = \"2008\",\n month = \"Jan\",\n volume = {477},\n number = {2},\n pages = {419-435},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20078191},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0709.3772},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...477..419C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{wang2011,\n author = {{Wang}, Jian-Min and {Ge}, Jun-Qiang and {Hu}, Chen and\n {Baldwin}, Jack A. and {Li}, Yan-Rong and {Ferland}, Gary J. and\n {Xiang}, Fei and {Yan}, Chang-Shuo and {Zhang}, Shu},\n title = \"{Star Formation in Self-gravitating Disks in Active Galactic Nuclei. I. Metallicity Gradients in Broad-line Regions}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {black hole physics, galaxies: evolution, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = \"2011\",\n month = \"Sep\",\n volume = {739},\n number = {1},\n eid = {3},\n pages = {3},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/739/1/3},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1107.3620},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...739....3W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{wang2012a,\n author = {{Wang}, Jian-Min and {Du}, Pu and {Baldwin}, Jack A. and\n {Ge}, Jun-Qiang and {Hu}, Chen and {Ferland}, Gary J.},\n title = \"{Star Formation in Self-gravitating Disks in Active Galactic Nuclei. II. Episodic Formation of Broad-line Regions}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {black hole physics, galaxies: evolution, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = \"2012\",\n month = \"Feb\",\n volume = {746},\n number = {2},\n eid = {137},\n pages = {137},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/137},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1202.0062},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...746..137W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{begelman1983,\n author = {{Begelman}, M.~C. and {McKee}, C.~F. and {Shields}, G.~A.},\n title = \"{Compton heated winds and coronae above accretion disks. I. Dynamics.}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {Accretion Disks, Stellar Coronas, Stellar Mass Accretion, Stellar Winds, X Ray Astronomy, Active Galactic Nuclei, Binary Stars, Hydrodynamic Equations, Quasars, Stellar Mass Ejection, X Ray Binaries, X Ray Sources, Astrophysics},\n year = \"1983\",\n month = \"Aug\",\n volume = {271},\n pages = {70-88},\n doi = {10.1086/161178},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...271...70B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{czernyKing1989,\n author = {{Czerny}, M. and {King}, A.~R.},\n title = \"{Accretion disc winds and coronae}\",\n journal = {MNRAS},\n keywords = {Accretion Disks, Stellar Coronas, Stellar Winds, Black Holes (Astronomy), Compton Effect, Energy Dissipation, Heating, Neutron Stars, Surface Temperature, Temperature Distribution, X Ray Binaries, Astrophysics},\n year = \"1989\",\n month = \"Feb\",\n volume = {236},\n pages = {843-850},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/236.4.843},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989MNRAS.236..843C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{witt1997,\n author = {{Witt}, Hans J. and {Czerny}, Bozena and {Zycki}, Piotr T.},\n title = \"{Accretion discs with accreting coronae in active galactic nuclei - II. The nuclear wind}\",\n journal = {MNRAS},\n keywords = {ACCRETION, ACCRETION DISCS, GALAXIES: ACTIVE, GALAXIES: SEYFERT, X-RAYS: GALAXIES, Astrophysics},\n year = \"1997\",\n month = \"Apr\",\n volume = {286},\n number = {4},\n pages = {848-864},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/286.4.848},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9509085},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997MNRAS.286..848W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{BlandfordBegelman1999,\n author = {{Blandford}, Roger D. and {Begelman}, Mitchell C.},\n title = \"{On the fate of gas accreting at a low rate on to a black hole}\",\n journal = {MNRAS},\n keywords = {ACCRETION, ACCRETION DISCS, BLACK HOLE PHYSICS, HYDRODYNAMICS, Astrophysics},\n year = \"1999\",\n month = \"Feb\",\n volume = {303},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L1-L5},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02358.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9809083},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.303L...1B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{naddaf2020,\n author = {{Naddaf}, Mohammad-Hassan and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Szczerba}, Ryszard},\n title = \"{BLR size in Realistic FRADO Model}\",\n journal = {Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences},\n keywords = {Broad line region, active galaxies, FRADO model, accretion disk, Dust opacity, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = apr,\n volume = {7},\n eid = {15},\n pages = {15},\n doi = {10.3389/fspas.2020.00015},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1912.00278},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020FrASS...7...15N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{baskin2018,\n author = {{Baskin}, Alexei and {Laor}, Ari},\n title = \"{Dust inflated accretion disc as the origin of the broad line region in active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {MNRAS},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = \"2018\",\n month = \"Feb\",\n volume = {474},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1970-1994},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx2850},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1711.00025},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474.1970B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{shangguan2018,\n author = {{Shangguan}, Jinyi and {Ho}, Luis C. and {Xie}, Yanxia},\n title = \"{On the Gas Content and Efficiency of AGN Feedback in Low-redshift Quasars}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: ISM, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, infrared: ISM, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2018,\n month = feb,\n volume = {854},\n number = {2},\n eid = {158},\n pages = {158},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aaa9be},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1802.08364},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...854..158S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{peterson2011,\n author = {{Peterson}, Bradley M.},\n title = \"{Masses of Black Holes in Active Galactic Nuclei: Implications for NLS1s}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = sep,\n eid = {arXiv:1109.4181},\n pages = {arXiv:1109.4181},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.1109.4181},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1109.4181},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011arXiv1109.4181P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{paliya2024,\n author = {{Paliya}, Vaidehi S. and {Stalin}, C.~S. and {Dom{\\'\\i}nguez}, Alberto and {Saikia}, D.~J.},\n title = \"{Narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies in Sloan Digital Sky Survey: a new optical spectroscopic catalogue}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {techniques: spectroscopic, galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2024,\n month = jan,\n volume = {527},\n number = {3},\n pages = {7055-7069},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad3650},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2311.13818},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.7055P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{zamfir2010,\n author = {{Zamfir}, S. and {Sulentic}, J.~W. and {Marziani}, P. and {Dultzin}, D.},\n title = \"{Detailed characterization of H{\\ensuremath{\\beta}} emission line profile in low-z SDSS quasars}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = apr,\n volume = {403},\n number = {4},\n pages = {1759-1786},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16236.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0912.4306},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.403.1759Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{shen_ho_2014,\n author = {{Shen}, Yue and {Ho}, Luis C.},\n title = \"{The diversity of quasars unified by accretion and orientation}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = sep,\n volume = {513},\n number = {7517},\n pages = {210-213},\n doi = {10.1038/nature13712},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1409.2887},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Natur.513..210S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{shen2011,\n author = {{Shen}, Yue and {Richards}, Gordon T. and {Strauss}, Michael A. and\n {Hall}, Patrick B. and {Schneider}, Donald P. and {Snedden}, Stephanie and\n {Bizyaev}, Dmitry and {Brewington}, Howard and {Malanushenko}, Viktor and\n {Malanushenko}, Elena and {Oravetz}, Dan and {Pan}, Kaike and\n {Simmons}, Audrey},\n title = \"{A Catalog of Quasar Properties from Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7}\",\n journal = {ApJs},\n keywords = {black hole physics, galaxies: active, quasars: general, surveys, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = jun,\n volume = {194},\n number = {2},\n eid = {45},\n pages = {45},\n doi = {10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/45},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1006.5178},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..194...45S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{compositespectra2001,\n author = {{Vanden Berk}, Daniel E. and {Richards}, Gordon T. and {Bauer}, Amanda and {Strauss}, Michael A. and {Schneider}, Donald P. and {Heckman}, Timothy M. and {York}, Donald G. and {Hall}, Patrick B. and {Fan}, Xiaohui and {Knapp}, G.~R. and {Anderson}, Scott F. and {Annis}, James and {Bahcall}, Neta A. and {Bernardi}, Mariangela and {Briggs}, John W. and {Brinkmann}, J. and {Brunner}, Robert and {Burles}, Scott and {Carey}, Larry and {Castander}, Francisco J. and {Connolly}, A.~J. and {Crocker}, J.~H. and {Csabai}, Istv{\\'a}n and {Doi}, Mamoru and {Finkbeiner}, Douglas and {Friedman}, Scott and {Frieman}, Joshua A. and {Fukugita}, Masataka and {Gunn}, James E. and {Hennessy}, G.~S. and {Ivezi{\\'c}}, {\\v{Z}}eljko and {Kent}, Stephen and {Kunszt}, Peter Z. and {Lamb}, D.~Q. and {Leger}, R. French and {Long}, Daniel C. and {Loveday}, Jon and {Lupton}, Robert H. and {Meiksin}, Avery and {Merelli}, Aronne and {Munn}, Jeffrey A. and {Newberg}, Heidi Jo and {Newcomb}, Matt and {Nichol}, R.~C. and {Owen}, Russell and {Pier}, Jeffrey R. and {Pope}, Adrian and {Rockosi}, Constance M. and {Schlegel}, David J. and {Siegmund}, Walter A. and {Smee}, Stephen and {Snir}, Yehuda and {Stoughton}, Chris and {Stubbs}, Christopher and {SubbaRao}, Mark and {Szalay}, Alexander S. and {Szokoly}, Gyula P. and {Tremonti}, Christy and {Uomoto}, Alan and {Waddell}, Patrick and {Yanny}, Brian and {Zheng}, Wei},\n title = \"{Composite Quasar Spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Quasars: Emission Lines, Galaxies: Quasars: General, Astrophysics},\n year = 2001,\n month = aug,\n volume = {122},\n number = {2},\n pages = {549-564},\n doi = {10.1086/321167},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0105231},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122..549V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{czerny2004b,\n author = {{Czerny}, B. and {Li}, J. and {Loska}, Z. and {Szczerba}, R.},\n title = \"{Extinction due to amorphous carbon grains in red quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey}\",\n journal = {MNRAS},\n keywords = {dust, extinction, galaxies: active, quasars: general, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = mar,\n volume = {348},\n number = {3},\n pages = {L54-L57},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07590.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0401158},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.348L..54C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{czerny2003,\n author = {{Czerny}, B. and {Niko{\\l}ajuk}, M. and {R{\\'o}{\\.z}a{\\'n}ska}, Agata and\n {Dumont}, A. -M. and {Loska}, Z. and {Zycki}, P.~T.},\n title = \"{Universal spectral shape of high accretion rate AGN}\",\n journal = {A\\&A},\n keywords = {radiative transfer, accretion disks, galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, X-ray, Astrophysics},\n year = \"2003\",\n month = \"Dec\",\n volume = {412},\n pages = {317-329},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20031441},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0309242},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...412..317C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{balbusHawley1991,\n author = {{Balbus}, Steven A. and {Hawley}, John F.},\n title = \"{A Powerful Local Shear Instability in Weakly Magnetized Disks. I. Linear Analysis}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Accretion Disks, Magnetohydrodynamic Stability, Stellar Magnetic Fields, Stellar Mass Accretion, Boussinesq Approximation, Computational Astrophysics, Linear Systems, Astrophysics, ACCRETION, HYDRODYNAMICS, HYDROMAGNETICS, INSTABILITIES},\n year = 1991,\n month = jul,\n volume = {376},\n pages = {214},\n doi = {10.1086/170270},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...376..214B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{hawley1995,\n author = {{Hawley}, John F. and {Gammie}, Charles F. and {Balbus}, Steven A.},\n title = \"{Local Three-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Accretion Disks}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {ACCRETION, ACCRETION DISKS, INSTABILITIES, MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS: MHD},\n year = 1995,\n month = feb,\n volume = {440},\n pages = {742},\n doi = {10.1086/175311},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...440..742H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{shlosman1985,\n author = {{Shlosman}, I. and {Vitello}, P.~A. and {Shaviv}, G.},\n title = \"{Active galactic nuclei - Internal dynamics and formation of emission clouds}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Accretion Disks, Active Galactic Nuclei, Black Holes (Astronomy), Cosmic Plasma, Clouds, Emission Spectra, Galactic Structure, Luminosity, Lyman Alpha Radiation, Opacity, Optical Thickness, Photosphere, Steady State, Ultraviolet Spectra, Astrophysics},\n year = 1985,\n month = jul,\n volume = {294},\n pages = {96-105},\n doi = {10.1086/163278},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...294...96S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{elitzur2006,\n author = {{Elitzur}, Moshe and {Shlosman}, Isaac},\n title = \"{The AGN-obscuring Torus: The End of the ``Doughnut'' Paradigm?}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Nuclei, Galaxies: Seyfert, Infrared: Galaxies, Galaxies: Quasars: General, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = sep,\n volume = {648},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L101-L104},\n doi = {10.1086/508158},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0605686},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...648L.101E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{fukumura2015,\n author = {{Fukumura}, Keigo and {Tombesi}, Francesco and {Kazanas}, Demosthenes and\n {Shrader}, Chris and {Behar}, Ehud and {Contopoulos}, Ioannis},\n title = \"{Magnetically Driven Accretion Disk Winds and Ultra-fast Outflows in PG 1211+143}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: individual: PG1211+143, galaxies: Seyfert, methods: numerical, X-rays: galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2015,\n month = may,\n volume = {805},\n number = {1},\n eid = {17},\n pages = {17},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/17},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1503.04074},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...805...17F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{zheng1990,\n author = {{Zheng}, Wei and {Binette}, Luc and {Sulentic}, Jack W.},\n title = \"{A Double-Stream Model for Line Profiles}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galactic Nuclei, H Beta Line, Line Shape, Line Spectra, Seyfert Galaxies, Emission Spectra, Forbidden Transitions, Oxygen Spectra, Spectrum Analysis, Astrophysics, GALAXIES: NUCLEI, GALAXIES: SEYFERT, LINE PROFILES},\n year = \"1990\",\n month = \"Dec\",\n volume = {365},\n pages = {115},\n doi = {10.1086/169462},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ApJ...365..115Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{kura2004,\n author = {{Czerny}, B. and {R{\\'o}za{\\'n}ska}, A. and {Kuraszkiewicz}, J.},\n title = \"{Constraints for the accretion disk evaporation rate in AGN from the existence of the Broad Line Region}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, X-rays: galaxies, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = dec,\n volume = {428},\n pages = {39-49},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20040487},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0403507},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...428...39C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{bon2018,\n author = {{Bon}, E. and {Marziani}, P. and {Berton}, M. and {Bon}, N. and\n {Antonucci}, R. and {Gaskell}, M. and {Ferland}, G.},\n title = \"{Fe II velocity shifts in optical spectra of type 1 AGN}\",\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n booktitle = {Revisiting narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies and their place in the Universe. 9-13 April 2018. Padova Botanical Garden},\n year = \"2018\",\n month = \"Apr\",\n eid = {7},\n pages = {7},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1812.05828},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018rnls.confE...7B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{elvis2017,\n author = {{Elvis}, Martin},\n title = \"{Quasar Rain: The Broad Emission Line Region as Condensations in the Warm Accretion Disk Wind}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, instabilities, line: formation, quasars: general, shock waves, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = \"2017\",\n month = \"Sep\",\n volume = {847},\n number = {1},\n eid = {56},\n pages = {56},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aa82b6},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1703.02956},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...847...56E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{barai2012,\n author = {{Barai}, Paramita and {Proga}, Daniel and {Nagamine}, Kentaro},\n title = \"{Multiphase, non-spherical gas accretion on to a black hole}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, hydrodynamics, radiation mechanisms: general, methods: numerical, galaxies: nuclei, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = \"2012\",\n month = \"Jul\",\n volume = {424},\n number = {1},\n pages = {728-746},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21260.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1112.5483},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.424..728B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{grier2012,\n author = {{Grier}, C.~J. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Pogge}, R.~W. and\n {Denney}, K.~D. and {Bentz}, M.~C. and {Martini}, Paul and\n {Sergeev}, S.~G. and {Kaspi}, S. and {Minezaki}, T. and {Zu}, Y.},\n title = \"{Reverberation Mapping Results for Five Seyfert 1 Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = \"2012\",\n month = \"Aug\",\n volume = {755},\n number = {1},\n eid = {60},\n pages = {60},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/755/1/60},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1206.6523},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...755...60G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{mocassin2003,\n author = {{Ercolano}, B. and {Barlow}, M.~J. and {Storey}, P.~J. and {Liu}, X.-W.\n\t},\n title = \"{MOCASSIN: a fully three-dimensional Monte Carlo photoionization code}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0209378},\n keywords = {atomic processes, ISM: abundances, H II regions, planetary nebulae: general},\n year = 2003,\n month = apr,\n volume = 340,\n pages = {1136-1152},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06371.x},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.340.1136E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{ferland2000,\n author = {{Bottorff}, M.~C. and {Ferland}, G.~J.},\n title = \"{Magnetic confinement, magnetohydrodynamic waves and smooth line profiles in active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0001532},\n keywords = {LINE: PROFILES, MAGNETIC FIELDS, MHD, GALAXIES: ACTIVE, GALAXIES: NUCLEI},\n year = 2000,\n month = jul,\n volume = 316,\n pages = {103-106},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03465.x},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.316..103B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{rees1987,\n author = {{Rees}, M.~J.},\n title = \"{Magnetic confinement of broad-line clouds in active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Interstellar Magnetic Fields, Interstellar Matter, Plasma Clouds, Confinement, Field Strength, Line Spectra},\n year = 1987,\n month = oct,\n volume = 228,\n pages = {47P-50P},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/228.1.47P},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987MNRAS.228P..47R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{krolik2009,\n author = {{Schnittman}, Jeremy D. and {Krolik}, Julian H.},\n title = \"{X-ray Polarization from Accreting Black Holes: The Thermal State}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {black hole physics, polarization, radiative transfer, X-rays: binaries, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = \"2009\",\n month = \"Aug\",\n volume = {701},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1175-1187},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/1175},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0902.3982},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...701.1175S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{peterson2004,\n author = {{Peterson}, B.~M. and {Ferrarese}, L. and {Gilbert}, K.~M. and\n {Kaspi}, S. and {Malkan}, M.~A. and {Maoz}, D. and {Merritt}, D. and\n {Netzer}, H. and {Onken}, C.~A. and {Pogge}, R.~W. and\n {Vestergaard}, M. and {Wandel}, A.},\n title = \"{Central Masses and Broad-Line Region Sizes of Active Galactic Nuclei. II. A Homogeneous Analysis of a Large Reverberation-Mapping Database}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Nuclei, Galaxies: Seyfert, Galaxies: Quasars: Emission Lines, Astrophysics},\n year = \"2004\",\n month = \"Oct\",\n volume = {613},\n number = {2},\n pages = {682-699},\n doi = {10.1086/423269},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0407299},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...613..682P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{peterson2004b,\n author = {{Peterson}, B.~M. and {Horne}, K.},\n title = \"{Echo mapping of active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {Astronomische Nachrichten},\n keywords = {methods: data analysis, galaxies: active, galaxies: black holes, Astrophysics},\n year = \"2004\",\n month = \"Mar\",\n volume = {325},\n number = {3},\n pages = {248-251},\n doi = {10.1002/asna.200310207},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0407538},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AN....325..248P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{peterson2000,\n author = {{Peterson}, B.~M. and {Wandel}, A.},\n title = \"{Evidence for Supermassive Black Holes in Active Galactic Nuclei from Emission-Line Reverberation}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0007147},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Seyfert, Galaxies: Quasars: Emission Lines},\n year = 2000,\n month = sep,\n volume = 540,\n pages = {L13-L16},\n doi = {10.1086/312862},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...540L..13P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{netzer1983,\n author = {{Netzer}, H. and {Wills}, B.~J.},\n title = \"{Broad emission features in QSOs and active galactic nuclei. I - New calculations of Fe II line strengths}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Astronomical Spectroscopy, Iron, Line Spectra, Quasars, Stellar Spectra, Absorption Spectra, Fluorescence, Late Stars, Seyfert Galaxies},\n year = 1983,\n month = dec,\n volume = 275,\n pages = {445-460},\n doi = {10.1086/161545},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...275..445N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{baldwin1995,\n author = {{Baldwin}, J. and {Ferland}, G. and {Korista}, K. and {Verner}, D.\n\t},\n title = \"{Locally Optimally Emitting Clouds and the Origin of Quasar Emission Lines}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9510080},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: QUASARS: EMISSION LINES},\n year = 1995,\n month = dec,\n volume = 455,\n pages = {L119},\n doi = {10.1086/309827},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...455L.119B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{kallman2001,\n author = {{Kallman}, T. and {Bautista}, M.},\n title = \"{Photoionization and High-Density Gas}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Atomic Processes, Radiation Mechanisms: Thermal, Radiative Transfer, Ultraviolet: General, X-Rays: General},\n year = 2001,\n month = mar,\n volume = 133,\n pages = {221-253},\n doi = {10.1086/319184},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJS..133..221K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@MISC{sutherland2018,\n author = {{Sutherland}, R. and {Dopita}, M. and {Binette}, L. and {Groves}, B.\n\t},\n title = \"{MAPPINGS V: Astrophysical plasma modeling code}\",\n keywords = {Software },\nhowpublished = {Astrophysics Source Code Library},\n year = 2018,\n month = jul,\narchivePrefix = \"ascl\",\n eprint = {1807.005},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ascl.soft07005S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{dumont2006,\n author = {{Goncalves}, A.~C. and {Collin}, S. and {Dumont}, A.~M.},\n title = \"{TITAN: a transfer-photoionisation code for hot, thick media}\",\nbooktitle = {SF2A-2006: Semaine de l'Astrophysique Francaise},\n year = 2006,\n editor = {{Barret}, D. and {Casoli}, F. and {Lagache}, G. and {Lecavelier}, A. and \n\t{Pagani}, L.},\n month = jun,\n pages = {157},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006sf2a.conf..157G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{robitaille2011,\n author = {{Robitaille}, T.~P.},\n title = \"{HYPERION: an open-source parallelized three-dimensional dust continuum radiative transfer code}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, radiative transfer, scattering, polarization, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Galaxy Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics},\n year = \"2011\",\n month = \"Dec\",\n volume = {536},\n eid = {A79},\n pages = {A79},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201117150},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1112.1071},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...536A..79R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{netzer1996,\n author = {{Netzer}, H.},\n title = \"{X-Ray Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei and Photoionized Gases}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: ACTIVE, GALAXIES: ISM, GALAXIES: NUCLEI, LINE: FORMATION, X-RAYS: GALAXIES},\n year = 1996,\n month = dec,\n volume = 473,\n pages = {781},\n doi = {10.1086/178190},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...473..781N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{morisset2005,\n author = {{Morisset}, C. and {Stasi{\\'n}ska}, G. and {Pe{\\~n}a}, M.},\n title = \"{Modelling of aspherical nebulae - I. A quick pseudo-3D photoionization code}\",\n journal = {MNRAS},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0503082},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, ISM: abundances, HII regions, planetary nebulae: general},\n year = 2005,\n month = jun,\n volume = 360,\n pages = {499-508},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09049.x},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.360..499M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{henney2005,\n author = {{Henney}, W.~J. and {Arthur}, S.~J. and {Williams}, R.~J.~R. and \n\t{Ferland}, G.~J.},\n title = \"{Self-Consistent Dynamic Models of Steady Ionization Fronts. I. Weak-D and Weak-R Fronts}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0501034},\n keywords = {ISM: H II Regions, Hydrodynamics, Methods: Numerical, Shock Waves},\n year = 2005,\n month = mar,\n volume = 621,\n pages = {328-347},\n doi = {10.1086/427491},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...621..328H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{verner1999,\n author = {{Verner}, E.~M. and {Verner}, D.~A. and {Korista}, K.~T. and \n\t{Ferguson}, J.~W. and {Hamann}, F. and {Ferland}, G.~J.},\n title = \"{Numerical Simulations of Fe II Emission Spectra}\",\n journal = {ApJS},\n keywords = {SUBJECT HEADINGS: ATOMIC PROCESSES, ISM: ATOMS, LINE: FORMATION, METHODS: NUMERICAL, Subject headings: Atomic Processes, ISM: Atoms, Line: Formation, Methods: Numerical},\n year = 1999,\n month = jan,\n volume = 120,\n pages = {101-112},\n doi = {10.1086/313171},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..120..101V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{lin1996,\n author = {{Lin}, D.~N.~C. and {Papaloizou}, J.~C.~B.},\n title = \"{Theory of Accretion Disks II: Application to Observed Systems}\",\n journal = {ARA\\&A},\n year = 1996,\n volume = 34,\n pages = {703-748},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.703},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ARA\\%26A..34..703L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{sadowski2016b,\n author = {{Sadowski}, Aleksander},\n title = \"{Magnetic flux stabilizing thin accretion discs}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, black hole physics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2016,\n month = oct,\n volume = {462},\n number = {1},\n pages = {960-965},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw1852},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1606.09566},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462..960S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{sadowski2016a,\n author = {{Sadowski}, Aleksander},\n title = \"{Thin accretion discs are stabilized by a strong magnetic field}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, black hole physics, relativistic processes, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2016,\n month = jul,\n volume = {459},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4397-4407},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw913},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1601.06785},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.459.4397S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{begelman2007,\n author = {{Begelman}, M.~C. and {Pringle}, J.~E.},\n title = \"{Accretion discs with strong toroidal magnetic fields}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, MHD, novae, cataclysmic variables, galaxies: active, X-rays: binaries, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = mar,\n volume = {375},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1070-1076},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11372.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0612300},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.375.1070B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Begelman2017,\n author = {{Begelman}, Mitchell C. and {Silk}, Joseph},\n title = \"{Magnetically elevated accretion discs in active galactic nuclei: broad emission-line regions and associated star formation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, black hole physics, Galaxy: nucleus, galaxies: active, quasars: general, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = jan,\n volume = {464},\n number = {2},\n pages = {2311-2317},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw2533},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1609.09456},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.464.2311B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{jiang2016,\ndoi = {10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/10},\nyear = {2016},\nmonth = {aug},\npublisher = {The American Astronomical Society},\nvolume = {827},\nnumber = {1},\npages = {10},\nauthor = {Jiang, Yan-Fei and Davis, Shane W. and Stone, James M.},\ntitle = {IRON OPACITY BUMP CHANGES THE STABILITY AND STRUCTURE OF ACCRETION DISKS IN ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI},\njournal = {The Astrophysical Journal}\n}\n\n@article{blaes2025,\n author={Blaes, Omer and Jiang, Yan-Fei and Lasota, Jean-Pierre and Lipunova, Galina},\n title={Non-Stationary Discs and Instabilities},\n journal={Space Science Reviews},\n doi={10.1007/s11214-025-01245-8},\n year={2025},\n month=nov,\n publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC},\n volume={221},\n number={8},\n ISSN={1572-9672},\n}\n\n@article{Narayan_1994,\n title={Advection-dominated accretion: A self-similar solution},\n volume={428},\n ISSN={1538-4357},\n DOI={10.1086/187381},\n journal={The Astrophysical Journal},\n publisher={American Astronomical Society},\n author={Narayan, Ramesh and Yi, Insu},\n year={1994},\n month=june, pages={L13} }\n\n@article{Narayan_1995,\n title={Advection-dominated Accretion: Underfed Black Holes and Neutron Stars},\n volume={452},\n ISSN={1538-4357},\n DOI={10.1086/176343},\n journal={The Astrophysical Journal},\n publisher={American Astronomical Society},\n author={Narayan, Ramesh and Yi, Insu},\n year={1995},\n month=oct, pages={710} }\n\n@ARTICLE{blandford2019,\n author = {{Blandford}, R.},\n title = \"{Black Holes as Cosmic Dynamos}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\narchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n eprint = {1901.05164},\n primaryClass = \"astro-ph.HE\",\n keywords = {Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2019,\n month = jan,\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190105164B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{grier2013,\n author = {{Grier}, C.~J. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Horne}, K. and {Bentz}, M.~C. and \n\t{Pogge}, R.~W. and {Denney}, K.~D. and {De Rosa}, G. and {Martini}, P. and \n\t{Kochanek}, C.~S. and {Zu}, Y. and {Shappee}, B. and {Siverd}, R. and \n\t{Beatty}, T.~G. and {Sergeev}, S.~G. and {Kaspi}, S. and {Araya Salvo}, C. and \n\t{Bird}, J.~C. and {Bord}, D.~J. and {Borman}, G.~A. and {Che}, X. and \n\t{Chen}, C. and {Cohen}, S.~A. and {Dietrich}, M. and {Doroshenko}, V.~T. and \n\t{Efimov}, Y.~S. and {Free}, N. and {Ginsburg}, I. and {Henderson}, C.~B. and \n\t{King}, A.~L. and {Mogren}, K. and {Molina}, M. and {Mosquera}, A.~M. and \n\t{Nazarov}, S.~V. and {Okhmat}, D.~N. and {Pejcha}, O. and {Rafter}, S. and \n\t{Shields}, J.~C. and {Skowron}, J. and {Szczygiel}, D.~M. and \n\t{Valluri}, M. and {van Saders}, J.~L.},\n title = \"{The Structure of the Broad-line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei. I. Reconstructed Velocity-delay Maps}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\narchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n eprint = {1210.2397},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert},\n year = 2013,\n month = feb,\n volume = 764,\n eid = {47},\n pages = {47},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/47},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764...47G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{CollinSouffrin1988,\n author = {{Collin-Souffrin}, S. and {Dyson}, J.~E. and {McDowell}, J.~C. and \n\t{Perry}, J.~J.},\n title = \"{The environment of active galactic nuclei. I - A two-component broad emission line model}\",\n journal = {MNRAS},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Emission Spectra, Interstellar Matter, Line Spectra, Star Clusters, Stellar Mass Ejection, Compton Effect, Shock Waves, Thermodynamic Equilibrium, X Ray Scattering},\n year = 1988,\n month = jun,\n volume = 232,\n pages = {539-550},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/232.3.539},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988MNRAS.232..539C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Khajenabi2016,\n author = {{Khajenabi}, Fazeleh},\n title = \"{Effect of the Drag Force on the Orbital Motion of the Broad-line Region Clouds}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = sep,\n volume = {828},\n number = {1},\n eid = {9},\n pages = {9},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/9},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1605.09144},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...828....9K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{NetzerMarziani2010,\n author = {{Netzer}, Hagai and {Marziani}, Paola},\n title = \"{The Effect of Radiation Pressure on Emission-line Profiles and Black Hole Mass Determination in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = \"2010\",\n month = \"Nov\",\n volume = {724},\n pages = {318-328},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/318},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1006.3553},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\\#abs/2010ApJ...724..318N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{plewa2013,\n author = {{Plewa}, P.~M. and {Schartmann}, M. and {Burkert}, A.},\n title = \"{Dynamics of gas and dust clouds in active galactic nuclei.}\",\n journal = {MNRAS},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: nuclei, Astrophysics - Galaxy Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = \"2013\",\n month = \"Apr\",\n volume = {431},\n pages = {L127-L130},\n doi = {10.1093/mnrasl/slt025},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1302.4287},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\\#abs/2013MNRAS.431L.127P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{marconi2008,\n author = {{Marconi}, Alessandro and {Axon}, David J. and {Maiolino}, Roberto and\n {Nagao}, Tohru and {Pastorini}, Guia and {Pietrini}, Paola and\n {Robinson}, Andrew and {Torricelli}, Guidetta},\n title = \"{The Effect of Radiation Pressure on Virial Black Hole Mass Estimates and the Case of Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, quasars: emission lines, radiation mechanisms: general, Astrophysics},\n year = \"2008\",\n month = \"May\",\n volume = {678},\n pages = {693-700},\n doi = {10.1086/529360},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0802.2021},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\\#abs/2008ApJ...678..693M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{liu2011,\n author = {{Liu}, Yuan and {Zhang}, Shuang Nan},\n title = \"{Dusty Torus Formation by Anisotropic Radiative Pressure Feedback of Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, X-rays: galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = \"2011\",\n month = \"Feb\",\n volume = {728},\n eid = {L44},\n pages = {L44},\n doi = {10.1088/2041-8205/728/2/L44},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1101.2364},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\\#abs/2011ApJ...728L..44L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{pounds1995,\n author = {{Pounds}, K.~A. and {Done}, C. and {Osborne}, J.~P.},\n title = \"{RE 1034+39: a high-state Seyfert galaxy?}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {ACCRETION, ACCRETION DISCS, GALAXIES: ACTIVE, GALAXIES: INDIVIDUAL: RE 1034+39, GALAXIES: SEYFERT, X-RAYS: GALAXIES},\n year = 1995,\n month = nov,\n volume = {277},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L5-L10},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/277.1.L5},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995MNRAS.277L...5P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{krause2011,\n author = {{Krause}, Martin and {Burkert}, Andreas and {Schartmann}, Marc},\n title = \"{Stability of cloud orbits in the broad-line region of active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {MNRAS},\n keywords = {methods: analytical, galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = \"2011\",\n month = \"Feb\",\n volume = {411},\n pages = {550-556},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17698.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1007.0112},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\\#abs/2011MNRAS.411..550K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{saslaw1978,\n author = {{Saslaw}, W.~C.},\n title = \"{Motion around a source whose luminosity changes.}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {Luminous Intensity, Orbit Calculation, Radiation Effects, Stellar Luminosity, Perturbation Theory, Poynting-Robertson Effect, Stochastic Processes, Astronomy, Stellar Dynamics},\n year = \"1978\",\n month = \"Nov\",\n volume = {226},\n pages = {240-252},\n doi = {10.1086/156603},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\\#abs/1978ApJ...226..240S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n@BOOK{netzer2013,\n author = {{Netzer}, Hagai},\n title = \"{The Physics and Evolution of Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n year = 2013,\n publisher = {Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013peag.book.....N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{naddaf2021,\n author = {{Naddaf}, Mohammad-Hassan and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Szczerba}, Ryszard},\n title = \"{The Picture of BLR in 2.5D FRADO: Dynamics and Geometry}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxy accretion disks, Radiative processes, Broad-absorption line quasar, Quasars, Astrophysical dust processes, Gas-to-dust ratio, Active galactic nuclei, Active galaxies, Reverberation mapping, Supermassive black holes, Galaxy winds, Dust continuum emission, 562, 2055, 183, 1319, 99, 638, 16, 17, 2019, 1663, 626, 412, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2021,\n month = oct,\n volume = {920},\n number = {1},\n eid = {30},\n pages = {30},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ac139d},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2102.00336},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...920...30N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{hoenig2019,\n author = {{H{\\\"o}nig}, Sebastian F.},\n title = \"{Redefining the Torus: A Unifying View of AGNs in the Infrared and Submillimeter}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active galaxies, Quasars, Active galactic nuclei, Infrared astronomy, Submillimeter astronomy, Optical interferometry, 17, 1319, 16, 786, 1647, 1168, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = oct,\n volume = {884},\n number = {2},\n eid = {171},\n pages = {171},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab4591},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1909.08639},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...884..171H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{rozanska2006,\n author = {{R{\\'o}{\\.z}a{\\'n}ska}, A. and {Goosmann}, R. and {Dumont}, A. -M. and {Czerny}, B.},\n title = \"{Modeling the warm absorber in active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {radiative transfer, line: identification, galaxies: Seyfert, X-rays:, galaxies, galaxies: active},\n year = 2006,\n month = jun,\n volume = {452},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1-13},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20052723},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...452....1R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{li2016,\n author = {{Li}, Yan-Rong and {Wang}, Jian-Min and {Bai}, Jin-Ming},\n title = \"{A Non-parametric Approach to Constrain the Transfer Function in Reverberation Mapping}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, quasars: general, methods: data analysis, methods: statistical, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = nov,\n volume = {831},\n number = {2},\n eid = {206},\n pages = {206},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/206},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1608.03741},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.IM},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...831..206L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{mioc1992,\n author = {{Mioc}, Vasile and {Radu}, Eugenia},\n title = \"{Orbits in an anisotropic radiation field}\",\n journal = {Astronomische Nachrichten},\n keywords = {Celestial Mechanics, Luminosity, Orbit Perturbation, Orbital Elements, Anisotropy, Newton Theory, Periodic Variations, Astrophysics},\n year = \"1992\",\n month = \"Nov\",\n volume = {313},\n pages = {353-357},\n doi = {10.1002/asna.2113130608},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\\#abs/1992AN....313..353M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{vinkovi2021,\n author = {{Vinkovi{\\'c}}, Dejan and {{\\v{C}}emelji{\\'c}}, Miljenko},\n title = \"{Inner dusty regions of protoplanetary discs - II. Dust dynamics driven by radiation pressure and disc winds}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {magnetic fields, MHD, stars: pre-main-sequence, Astrophysics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics},\n year = 2021,\n month = jan,\n volume = {500},\n number = {1},\n pages = {506-519},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa3272},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2010.09384},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.EP},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500..506V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{wang2012b,\n author = {{Wang}, Jian-Min and {Cheng}, Cheng and {Li}, Yan-Rong},\n title = \"{Clumpy Accretion onto Black Holes. I. Clumpy-advection-dominated Accretion Flow Structure and Radiation}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, black hole physics, hydrodynamics, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = \"2012\",\n month = \"Apr\",\n volume = {748},\n eid = {147},\n pages = {147},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/748/2/147},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1202.0059},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\\#abs/2012ApJ...748..147W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{gaskell2009,\n author = {{Gaskell}, C.~M.},\n title = \"{What broad emission lines tell us about how active galactic nuclei work}\",\n journal = {\\nar},\narchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n eprint = {0908.0386},\n year = 2009,\n month = \"jul\",\n volume = 53,\n pages = {140-148},\n doi = {10.1016/j.newar.2009.09.006},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009NewAR..53..140G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{shapovalova2010,\n author = {{Shapovalova}, A.~I. and {Popovi{\\'c}}, L. {\\v{C}}. and\n {Burenkov}, A.~N. and {Chavushyan}, V.~H. and {Ili{\\'c}}, D. and\n {Kova{\\v{c}}evi{\\'c}}, A. and {Bochkarev}, N.~G. and\n {Le{\\'o}n-Tavares}, J.},\n title = \"{Long-term variability of the optical spectra of NGC 4151. II. Evolution of the broad H{\\ensuremath{\\alpha}} and H{\\ensuremath{\\beta}} emission-line profiles}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: individual: NGC 4151, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = \"2010\",\n month = \"Jan\",\n volume = {509},\n eid = {A106},\n pages = {A106},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/200912311},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0910.2980},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...509A.106S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{wada2012,\n author = {{Wada}, Keiichi},\n title = \"{Radiation-driven Fountain and Origin of Torus around Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: Seyfert, galaxies: starburst, ISM: structure, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = \"2012\",\n month = \"Oct\",\n volume = {758},\n number = {1},\n eid = {66},\n pages = {66},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/758/1/66},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1208.5272},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...758...66W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{blandford1982,\n author = {{Blandford}, R.~D. and {McKee}, C.~F.},\n title = \"{Reverberation mapping of the emission line regions of Seyfert galaxies and quasars.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Astronomical Spectroscopy, Emission Spectra, Quasars, Seyfert Galaxies, Spectral Line Width, Radial Velocity, Radiative Transfer, Spatial Distribution, Stellar Mass Accretion, Transfer Functions, Velocity Distribution, Astrophysics},\n year = 1982,\n month = apr,\n volume = {255},\n pages = {419-439},\n doi = {10.1086/159843},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...255..419B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{croton2006,\n author = {{Croton}, Darren J. and {Springel}, Volker and {White}, Simon D.~M. and\n {De Lucia}, G. and {Frenk}, C.~S. and {Gao}, L. and {Jenkins}, A. and\n {Kauffmann}, G. and {Navarro}, J.~F. and {Yoshida}, N.},\n title = \"{The many lives of active galactic nuclei: cooling flows, black holes and the luminosities and colours of galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {black hole physics, galaxies: active, cooling flows, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = jan,\n volume = {365},\n number = {1},\n pages = {11-28},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09675.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0508046},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.365...11C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{WG2001b,\n author = {{Weingartner}, Joseph C. and {Draine}, B.~T.},\n title = \"{Dust Grain-Size Distributions and Extinction in the Milky Way, Large Magellanic Cloud, and Small Magellanic Cloud}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {ISM: Dust, Extinction, ISM: Clouds, Astrophysics},\n year = 2001,\n month = feb,\n volume = {548},\n number = {1},\n pages = {296-309},\n doi = {10.1086/318651},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0008146},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...548..296W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{loska1993,\n author = {{Loska}, Z. and {Szczerba}, R. and {Czerny}, B.},\n title = \"{Dust radiation in active galactic nuclei - I. Spherical distribution.}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Computational Astrophysics, Cosmic Dust, Graphite, Spatial Distribution, Accretion Disks, Astronomical Models, Infrared Spectra, Interstellar Extinction, Ultraviolet Spectra, Astrophysics},\n year = 1993,\n month = mar,\n volume = {261},\n pages = {63-73},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/261.1.63},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993MNRAS.261...63L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{bianchi2012,\n author = {{Bianchi}, Stefano and {Maiolino}, Roberto and {Risaliti}, Guido},\n title = \"{AGN Obscuration and the Unified Model}\",\n journal = {Advances in Astronomy},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2012,\n month = jan,\n volume = {2012},\n eid = {782030},\n pages = {782030},\n doi = {10.1155/2012/782030},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1201.2119},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AdAst2012E..17B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{jun2020,\n author = {{Jun}, Hyunsung D. and {Assef}, Roberto J. and {Carroll}, Christopher M. and {Hickox}, Ryan C. and {Kim}, Yonghwi and {Lee}, Jaehyun and {Ricci}, Claudio and {Stern}, Daniel},\n title = \"{The Dust-to-Gas Ratio and the Role of Radiation Pressure in Luminous Obscured Quasars}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2020,\n month = oct,\n eid = {arXiv:2010.15460},\n pages = {arXiv:2010.15460},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2010.15460},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv201015460J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{temple2020,\n author = {{Temple}, Matthew J. and {Banerji}, Manda and {Hewett}, Paul C. and {Rankine}, Amy L. and {Richards}, Gordon T.},\n title = \"{Exploring the link between C IV outflow kinematics and sublimation-temperature dust in quasars}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, quasars: general, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = dec,\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa3842},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2012.01425},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.tmp.3621T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{ishibashi2015,\n author = {{Ishibashi}, W. and {Fabian}, A.~C.},\n title = \"{AGN feedback: galactic-scale outflows driven by radiation pressure on dust}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {black hole physics, radiation: dynamics, galaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2015,\n month = jul,\n volume = {451},\n number = {1},\n pages = {93-102},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv944},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1504.07393},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451...93I},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{harrison2014,\n author = {{Harrison}, C.~M. and {Alexander}, D.~M. and {Mullaney}, J.~R. and {Swinbank}, A.~M.},\n title = \"{Kiloparsec-scale outflows are prevalent among luminous AGN: outflows and feedback in the context of the overall AGN population}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2014,\n month = jul,\n volume = {441},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3306-3347},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu515},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1403.3086},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.441.3306H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{thompson2015,\n author = {{Thompson}, Todd A. and {Fabian}, Andrew C. and {Quataert}, Eliot and {Murray}, Norman},\n title = \"{Dynamics of dusty radiation-pressure-driven shells and clouds: fast outflows from galaxies, star clusters, massive stars, and AGN}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: starburst, galaxies: star clusters: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = may,\n volume = {449},\n number = {1},\n pages = {147-161},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv246},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1406.5206},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449..147T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{ishibashi2017,\n author = {{Ishibashi}, W. and {Banerji}, M. and {Fabian}, A.~C.},\n title = \"{AGN radiative feedback in dusty quasar populations}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {black hole physics, radiation: dynamics, galaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2017,\n month = aug,\n volume = {469},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1496-1501},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx921},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1704.03712},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469.1496I},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{hopkins2010,\n author = {{Hopkins}, Philip F. and {Elvis}, Martin},\n title = \"{Quasar feedback: more bang for your buck}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, quasars: general, cosmology: theory, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2010,\n month = jan,\n volume = {401},\n number = {1},\n pages = {7-14},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15643.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0904.0649},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.401....7H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{rees1969,\n author = {{Rees}, M.~J. and {Silk}, J.~I. and {Werner}, M.~W. and {Wickramasinghe}, N.~C.},\n title = \"{Infrared Radiation from Dust in Seyfert Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n year = 1969,\n month = aug,\n volume = {223},\n number = {5208},\n pages = {788-791},\n doi = {10.1038/223788a0},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969Natur.223..788R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{rieke1978,\n author = {{Rieke}, G.~H.},\n title = \"{The infrared emission of Seyfert galaxies.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galactic Radiation, Infrared Astronomy, Infrared Spectra, Seyfert Galaxies, Balmer Series, Continuous Spectra, Correlation Coefficients, Galactic Nuclei, Infrared Radiation, Interstellar Extinction, Spectral Energy Distribution, Tables (Data), Astronomy, Dust:Seyfert Galaxies, Infrared Radiation:Seyfert Galaxies},\n year = 1978,\n month = dec,\n volume = {226},\n pages = {550-558},\n doi = {10.1086/156639},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ApJ...226..550R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{antonucci1985,\n author = {{Antonucci}, R.~R.~J. and {Miller}, J.~S.},\n title = \"{Spectropolarimetry and the nature of NGC 1068.}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galactic Nuclei, Polarimetry, Seyfert Galaxies, Balmer Series, Circular Polarization, Emission Spectra, Iron, Line Spectra, Oxygen, Astrophysics},\n year = 1985,\n month = oct,\n volume = {297},\n pages = {621-632},\n doi = {10.1086/163559},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...297..621A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{kishimoto2009,\n author = {{Kishimoto}, M. and {H{\\\"o}nig}, S.~F. and {Antonucci}, R. and {Kotani}, T. and {Barvainis}, R. and {Tristram}, K.~R.~W. and {Weigelt}, G.},\n title = \"{Exploring the inner region of type 1 AGNs with the Keck interferometer}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, infrared: galaxies, techniques: interferometric, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = dec,\n volume = {507},\n number = {3},\n pages = {L57-L60},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/200913512},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0911.0666},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...507L..57K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{kishimoto2011,\n author = {{Kishimoto}, M. and {H{\\\"o}nig}, S.~F. and {Antonucci}, R. and {Barvainis}, R. and {Kotani}, T. and {Tristram}, K.~R.~W. and {Weigelt}, G. and {Levin}, K.},\n title = \"{The innermost dusty structure in active galactic nuclei as probed by the Keck interferometer}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, infrared: galaxies, techniques: interferometric, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = mar,\n volume = {527},\n eid = {A121},\n pages = {A121},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201016054},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1012.5359},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...527A.121K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{swain2003,\n author = {{Swain}, M. and {Vasisht}, G. and {Akeson}, R. and {Monnier}, J. and {Millan-Gabet}, R. and {Serabyn}, E. and {Creech-Eakman}, M. and {van Belle}, G. and {Beletic}, J. and {Beichman}, C. and {Boden}, A. and {Booth}, A. and {Colavita}, M. and {Gathright}, J. and {Hrynevych}, M. and {Koresko}, C. and {Le Mignant}, D. and {Ligon}, R. and {Mennesson}, B. and {Neyman}, C. and {Sargent}, A. and {Shao}, M. and {Thompson}, R. and {Unwin}, S. and {Wizinowich}, P.},\n title = \"{Interferometer Observations of Subparsec-Scale Infrared Emission in the Nucleus of NGC 4151}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 4151, Galaxies: Seyfert, Instrumentation: Interferometers, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = oct,\n volume = {596},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L163-L166},\n doi = {10.1086/379235},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0308513},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...596L.163S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{schnulle2015,\n author = {{Schn{\\\"u}lle}, K. and {Pott}, J. -U. and {Rix}, H. -W. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {De Rosa}, G. and {Shappee}, B.},\n title = \"{Monitoring the temperature and reverberation delay of the circumnuclear hot dust in NGC 4151}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, galaxies: individual: NGC 4151, infrared: galaxies, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = jun,\n volume = {578},\n eid = {A57},\n pages = {A57},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201525733},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1504.07286},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...578A..57S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Gravity2020,\n author = {{Gravity Collaboration} and {Dexter}, J. and {Shangguan}, J. and {H{\\\"o}nig}, S. and {Kishimoto}, M. and {Lutz}, D. and {Netzer}, H. and {Davies}, R. and {Sturm}, E. and {Pfuhl}, O. and {Amorim}, A. and {Baub{\\\"o}ck}, M. and {Brandner}, W. and {Cl{\\'e}net}, Y. and {de Zeeuw}, P.~T. and {Eckart}, A. and {Eisenhauer}, F. and {F{\\\"o}rster Schreiber}, N.~M. and {Gao}, F. and {Garcia}, P.~J.~V. and {Genzel}, R. and {Gillessen}, S. and {Gratadour}, D. and {Jim{\\'e}nez-Rosales}, A. and {Lacour}, S. and {Millour}, F. and {Ott}, T. and {Paumard}, T. and {Perraut}, K. and {Perrin}, G. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Petrucci}, P.~O. and {Prieto}, M.~A. and {Rouan}, D. and {Schartmann}, M. and {Shimizu}, T. and {Sternberg}, A. and {Straub}, O. and {Straubmeier}, C. and {Tacconi}, L.~J. and {Tristram}, K. and {Vermot}, P. and {Waisberg}, I. and {Widmann}, F. and {Woillez}, J.},\n title = \"{The resolved size and structure of hot dust in the immediate vicinity of AGN}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: nuclei, techniques: interferometric, galaxies: active, quasars: general, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2020,\n month = mar,\n volume = {635},\n eid = {A92},\n pages = {A92},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201936767},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1910.00593},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...635A..92G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{lawrence2010,\n author = {{Lawrence}, Andy and {Elvis}, Martin},\n title = \"{Misaligned Disks as Obscurers in Active Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, quasars: general},\n year = 2010,\n month = may,\n volume = {714},\n number = {1},\n pages = {561-570},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/714/1/561},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...714..561L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{koshida2014,\n author = {{Koshida}, Shintaro and {Minezaki}, Takeo and {Yoshii}, Yuzuru and {Kobayashi}, Yukiyasu and {Sakata}, Yu and {Sugawara}, Shota and {Enya}, Keigo and {Suganuma}, Masahiro and {Tomita}, Hiroyuki and {Aoki}, Tsutomu and {Peterson}, Bruce A.},\n title = \"{Reverberation Measurements of the Inner Radius of the Dust Torus in 17 Seyfert Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {dust, extinction, galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, infrared: galaxies, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2014,\n month = jun,\n volume = {788},\n number = {2},\n eid = {159},\n pages = {159},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/159},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1406.2078},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...788..159K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{pott2010,\n author = {{Pott}, Jorg-Uwe and {Malkan}, Matt A. and {Elitzur}, Moshe and {Ghez}, Andrea M. and {Herbst}, Tom M. and {Sch{\\\"o}del}, Rainer and {Woillez}, Julien},\n title = \"{Luminosity-variation Independent Location of the Circum-nuclear, Hot Dust in NGC 4151}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: individual: NGC 4151, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, techniques: interferometric, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = jun,\n volume = {715},\n number = {2},\n pages = {736-742},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/715/2/736},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1003.4757},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...715..736P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{minezaki2019,\n author = {{Minezaki}, Takeo and {Yoshii}, Yuzuru and {Kobayashi}, Yukiyasu and {Sugawara}, Shota and {Sakata}, Yu and {Enya}, Keigo and {Koshida}, Shintaro and {Tomita}, Hiroyuki and {Suganuma}, Masahiro and {Aoki}, Tsutomu and {Peterson}, Bruce A.},\n title = \"{Reverberation Measurements of the Inner Radii of the Dust Tori in Quasars}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active galactic nuclei, Quasars, Dust continuum emission, Cosmological parameters, 16, 1319, 412, 339, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2019,\n month = dec,\n volume = {886},\n number = {2},\n eid = {150},\n pages = {150},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab4f7b},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1910.08722},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886..150M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{suganuma2006,\n author = {{Suganuma}, Masahiro and {Yoshii}, Yuzuru and {Kobayashi}, Yukiyasu and {Minezaki}, Takeo and {Enya}, Keigo and {Tomita}, Hiroyuki and {Aoki}, Tsutomu and {Koshida}, Shintaro and {Peterson}, Bruce A.},\n title = \"{Reverberation Measurements of the Inner Radius of the Dust Torus in Nearby Seyfert 1 Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {ISM: Dust, Extinction, Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 3227, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 4051, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 5548, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 7469, Galaxies: Seyfert, Infrared: Galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = mar,\n volume = {639},\n number = {1},\n pages = {46-63},\n doi = {10.1086/499326},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0511697},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...639...46S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{goad2012,\n author = {{Goad}, M.~R. and {Korista}, K.~T. and {Ruff}, A.~J.},\n title = \"{The broad emission-line region: the confluence of the outer accretion disc with the inner edge of the dusty torus}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {line: profiles, methods: numerical, galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2012,\n month = nov,\n volume = {426},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3086-3111},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21808.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1207.6339},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.426.3086G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{kawaguchi2010,\n author = {{Kawaguchi}, Toshihiro and {Mori}, Masao},\n title = \"{Orientation Effects on the Inner Region of Dusty Torus of Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, dust, extinction, galaxies: active, galaxies: structure, infrared: galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = dec,\n volume = {724},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L183-L187},\n doi = {10.1088/2041-8205/724/2/L183},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1010.5799},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...724L.183K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{kawaguchi2011,\n author = {{Kawaguchi}, Toshihiro and {Mori}, Masao},\n title = \"{Near-infrared Reverberation by Dusty Clumpy Tori in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, dust, extinction, galaxies: active, galaxies: structure, infrared: galaxies, infrared: ISM, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = aug,\n volume = {737},\n number = {2},\n eid = {105},\n pages = {105},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/105},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1107.0678},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...737..105K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{oknyansky2015,\n author = {{Oknyansky}, V.~L. and {Gaskell}, C.~M. and {Shimanovskaya}, E.~V.},\n title = \"{The Relative Wavelength Independence of IR Lags in Active Galactic Nuclei: Implications for the Distribution of the Hot Dust}\",\n journal = {Odessa Astronomical Publications},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, infrared: galaxies, galaxies: WPVS48, PGC 50427, Ark 120, Mrk 509, MCG-6-30-15; optical and IR variability, time delay, data analysis, dust torus, cosmology., Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = jan,\n volume = {28},\n pages = {175},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1511.02170},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015OAP....28..175O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{figaredo2020,\n author = {{Figaredo}, Catalina Sobrino and {Haas}, Martin and {Ramolla}, Michael and {Chini}, Rolf and {Blex}, Julia and {Hodapp}, Klaus Werner and {Murphy}, Miguel and {Kollatschny}, Wolfram and {Chelouche}, Doron and {Kaspi}, Shai},\n title = \"{Dust Reverberation of 3C 273: Torus Structure and Lag-Luminosity Relation}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Reverberation mapping, Active galactic nuclei, Photometry, Quasars, 2019, 16, 1234, 1319, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = jun,\n volume = {159},\n number = {6},\n eid = {259},\n pages = {259},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-3881/ab89b1},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2004.10244},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....159..259S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{lawrence1997,\n author = {{Lawrence}, A. and {Elvis}, M. and {Wilkes}, B.~J. and {McHardy}, I. and {Brandt}, N.},\n title = \"{X-ray and optical continua of active galactic nuclei with extreme Fe II emission}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: ACTIVE, GALAXIES: NUCLEI, QUASARS: EMISSION LINES, X-RAYS: GALAXIES},\n year = 1997,\n month = mar,\n volume = {285},\n number = {4},\n pages = {879-890},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/285.4.879},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997MNRAS.285..879L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{boroson1992,\n author = {{Boroson}, Todd A. and {Green}, Richard F.},\n title = \"{The Emission-Line Properties of Low-Redshift Quasi-stellar Objects}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Emission Spectra, Line Spectra, Quasars, Seyfert Galaxies, Astronomical Spectroscopy, Computational Astrophysics, Principal Components Analysis, Red Shift, Sky Surveys (Astronomy), Astrophysics, GALAXIES: SEYFERT, GALAXIES: QUASARS: GENERAL, SURVEYS},\n year = 1992,\n month = may,\n volume = {80},\n pages = {109},\n doi = {10.1086/191661},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJS...80..109B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{reeves2000,\n author = {{Reeves}, J.~N. and {Turner}, M.~J.~L.},\n title = \"{X-ray spectra of a large sample of quasars with ASCA}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {SURVEYS, GALAXIES: ACTIVE, QUASARS: GENERAL, X-RAYS: GENERAL, Astrophysics},\n year = 2000,\n month = aug,\n volume = {316},\n number = {2},\n pages = {234-248},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03510.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0003080},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.316..234R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{le2019,\n author = {{Le}, Huynh Anh N. and {Woo}, Jong-Hak},\n title = \"{Comparison of the UV and Optical Fe II Emission in Type 1 AGNs}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active galaxies, AGN host galaxies, Quasars, Emission line galaxies, 17, 2017, 1319, 459, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = dec,\n volume = {887},\n number = {2},\n eid = {236},\n pages = {236},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab5714},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1911.03877},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...887..236L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{raimundo2020,\n author = {{Raimundo}, S.~I. and {Vestergaard}, M. and {Goad}, M.~R. and {Grier}, C.~J. and {Williams}, P.~R. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Treu}, T.},\n title = \"{Modelling the AGN broad-line region using single-epoch spectra - II. Nearby AGNs}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2020,\n month = mar,\n volume = {493},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1227-1248},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa285},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1909.01395},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.1227R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{wang2013,\n author = {{Wang}, Huiyuan and {Xing}, Feijun and {Zhang}, Kai and {Wang}, Tinggui and {Zhou}, Hongyan and {Zhang}, Shaohua},\n title = \"{Outflow and Hot Dust Emission in High-redshift Quasars}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {dust, extinction, galaxies: nuclei, infrared: galaxies, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = oct,\n volume = {776},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L15},\n pages = {L15},\n doi = {10.1088/2041-8205/776/1/L15},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1309.4465},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...776L..15W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{costa2018,\n author = {{Costa}, Tiago and {Rosdahl}, Joakim and {Sijacki}, Debora and {Haehnelt}, Martin G.},\n title = \"{Driving gas shells with radiation pressure on dust in radiation-hydrodynamic simulations}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {radiative transfer, methods: numerical, galaxies: evolution, supermassive black holes, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = jan,\n volume = {473},\n number = {3},\n pages = {4197-4219},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx2598},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1703.05766},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.4197C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{costa2020,\n author = {{Costa}, Tiago and {Pakmor}, R{\\\"u}diger and {Springel}, Volker},\n title = \"{Powering galactic superwinds with small-scale AGN winds}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {hydrodynamics, shock waves, methods: numerical, galaxies: evolution, quasars: supermassive black holes, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = aug,\n volume = {497},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5229-5255},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa2321},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2006.05997},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.497.5229C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{ward2014,\n author = {{Ward}, Rachel L. and {Wadsley}, James and {Sills}, Alison},\n title = \"{Evolving molecular cloud structure and the column density probability distribution function}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {stars: formation, ISM: clouds, ISM: evolution, ISM: kinematics and dynamics, ISM: structure, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2014,\n month = dec,\n volume = {445},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1575-1583},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu1868},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1409.2540},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.1575W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{blandford1990,\n author = {{Blandford}, R.~D. and {Netzer}, H. and {Woltjer}, L. and {Courvoisier}, T.~J.~-L. and {Mayor}, M.},\n title = \"{Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n keywords = {ASTRONOMIE, ASTRONOMY, ASTROPHYSICS, ASTROPHYSIK, Astronomy-Astrophysics; Geophysics-Geodesy, GALACTIC NUCLEI: CONGRESSES, ACTIVE GALAXIES: CONGRESSES},\n booktitle = {Active Galactic Nuclei},\n year = 1990,\n month = jan,\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990agn..conf.....B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{tek2018,\n author = {{Adhikari}, T.~P. and {Hryniewicz}, K. and {R{\\'o}{\\.z}a{\\'n}ska}, A. and {Czerny}, B. and {Ferland}, G.~J.},\n title = \"{Intermediate-line Emission in AGNs: The Effect of Prescription of the Gas Density}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, methods: numerical, quasars: emission lines, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = mar,\n volume = {856},\n number = {1},\n eid = {78},\n pages = {78},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aab350},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1803.00090},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856...78A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{netzer1993,\n author = {{Netzer}, Hagai and {Laor}, Ari},\n title = \"{Dust in the Narrow-Line Region of Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Cosmic Dust, Emission Spectra, Spectral Line Width, Lyman Alpha Radiation, Quasars, Astrophysics, GALAXIES: ACTIVE, GALAXIES: SEYFERT, GALAXIES: QUASARS: EMISSION LINES},\n year = 1993,\n month = feb,\n volume = {404},\n pages = {L51},\n doi = {10.1086/186741},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...404L..51N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{gezari2007,\n author = {{gezari}, S. and {Halpern}, J.~P. and {Eracleous}, M.},\n title = \"{Long-Term Profile Variability of Double-peaked Emission Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0702594},\n keywords = {Accretion, Accretion Disks, Galaxies: Active, Line: Profiles},\n year = 2007,\n month = apr,\n volume = 169,\n pages = {167-212},\n doi = {10.1086/511032},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..169..167G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{quataert2004,\n author = {{quataert}, E.},\n title = \"{A Dynamical Model for Hot Gas in the Galactic Center}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0310446},\n keywords = {Accretion, Accretion Disks, Galaxy: Center},\n year = 2004,\n month = sep,\n volume = 613,\n pages = {322-325},\n doi = {10.1086/422973},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...613..322Q},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{antonucci1993,\n author = {{Antonucci}, R.},\n title = \"{Unified models for active galactic nuclei and quasars}\",\n journal = {ARA\\&A},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Astronomical Polarimetry, Quasars, Radio Galaxies, Astronomical Spectroscopy, Bl Lacertae Objects, Blazars},\n year = 1993,\n volume = 31,\n pages = {473-521},\n doi = {10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002353},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ARA26A..31..473A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@INPROCEEDINGS{netzer1990,\n author = {{Netzer}, H.},\n title = \"{AGN emission lines.}\",\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei: Emission Lines, Active Galactic Nuclei: Line Formation, Active Galactic Nuclei: Photoionization},\nbooktitle = {Active Galactic Nuclei},\n year = 1990,\n editor = {{Blandford}, R.~D. and {Netzer}, H. and {Woltjer}, L. and {Courvoisier}, T.~J.-L. and \n\t{Mayor}, M.},\n pages = {57-160},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990agn..conf...57N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@BOOK{netzer2013book,\n author = {{Netzer}, H.},\n title = \"{The Physics and Evolution of Active Galactic Nuclei (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press)}\",\nbooktitle = {The Physics and Evolution of Active Galactic Nuclei, by Hagai Netzer, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013},\n year = 2013,\n month = nov,\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013peag.book.....N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{osterbrock1977,\n author = {{Osterbrock}, D.~E.},\n title = \"{Spectrophotometry of Seyfert 1 galaxies}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {Emission Spectra, H Lines, Radio Galaxies, Seyfert Galaxies, Spectral Line Width, Spectrophotometry, Abundance, Astronomical Photometry, Astronomical Spectroscopy, H Alpha Line, H Beta Line, Helium, Radio Spectra, Tables (Data)},\n year = 1977,\n month = aug,\n volume = 215,\n pages = {733-745},\n doi = {10.1086/155407},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ApJ...215..733O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{bentz2009,\n author = {{Bentz}, M.~C. and {Walsh}, J.~L. and {Barth}, A.~J. and {Baliber}, N. and \n\t{Bennert}, V.~N. and {Canalizo}, G. and {Filippenko}, A.~V. and \n\t{Ganeshalingam}, M. and {Gates}, E.~L. and {Greene}, J.~E. and \n\t{Hidas}, M.~G. and {Hiner}, K.~D. and {Lee}, N. and {Li}, W. and \n\t{Malkan}, M.~A. and {Minezaki}, T. and {Sakata}, Y. and {Serduke}, F.~J.~D. and \n\t{Silverman}, J.~M. and {Steele}, T.~N. and {Stern}, D. and {Street}, R.~A. and \n\t{Thornton}, C.~E. and {Treu}, T. and {Wang}, X. and {Woo}, J.-H. and \n\t{Yoshii}, Y.},\n title = \"{The Lick AGN Monitoring Project: Broad-line Region Radii and Black Hole Masses from Reverberation Mapping of H{$\\beta$}}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\narchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n eprint = {0908.0003},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert},\n year = 2009,\n month = nov,\n volume = 705,\n pages = {199-217},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/199},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...705..199B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{osterbrock1981,\n author = {{Osterbrock}, D.~E.},\n title = \"{Seyfert galaxies with weak broad H alpha emission lines}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {Emission Spectra, H Alpha Line, H Beta Line, Seyfert Galaxies, Spectrophotometry, Astronomical Photometry, Forbidden Bands, Ionization, Radio Galaxies, Spectrum Analysis, Tables (Data)},\n year = 1981,\n month = oct,\n volume = 249,\n pages = {462-470},\n doi = {10.1086/159306},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981ApJ...249..462O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{winkler1992,\n author = {{Winkler}, H.},\n title = \"{Variability studies of Seyfert galaxies. II - Spectroscopy}\",\n journal = {MNRAS},\n keywords = {Astronomical Spectroscopy, Balmer Series, Galactic Radiation, Seyfert Galaxies, Variability, Emission Spectra, Peculiar Stars, Spectral Line Width, Stellar Luminosity},\n year = 1992,\n month = aug,\n volume = 257,\n pages = {677-688},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/257.4.677},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.257..677W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{bennert2006,\n author = {{Bennert}, N. and {Jungwiert}, B. and {Komossa}, S. and {Haas}, M. and {Chini}, R.},\n title = \"{Size and properties of the narrow-line region in Seyfert-1 galaxies from spatially-resolved optical spectroscopy}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = nov,\n volume = {459},\n number = {1},\n pages = {55-69},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20065477},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0606367},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...459...55B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{ferland2009,\n author = {{Ferland}, G.~J. and {Hu}, C. and {Wang}, J.-M. and {Baldwin}, J.~A. and \n\t{Porter}, R.~L. and {van Hoof}, P.~A.~M. and {Williams}, R.~J.~R.\n\t},\n title = \"{Implications of Infalling Fe II-Emitting Clouds in Active Galactic Nuclei: Anisotropic Properties}\",\n journal = {ApJL},\narchivePrefix = \"arXiv\",\n eprint = {0911.1173},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, atomic processes, galaxies: active, line: formation, quasars: emission lines},\n year = 2009,\n month = Dec,\n volume = 707,\n pages = {L82-L86},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/L82},\n adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...707L..82F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{elitzur2014,\n author = {{Elitzur}, Moshe and {Ho}, Luis C. and {Trump}, Jonathan R.},\n title = \"{Evolution of broad-line emission from active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {MNRAS},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = \"2014\",\n month = \"Mar\",\n volume = {438},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3340-3351},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt2445},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1312.4922},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438.3340E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{DuPu2016,\n author = {{Du}, Pu and {Lu}, Kai-Xing and {Zhang}, Zhi-Xiang and {Huang}, Ying-Ke and\n {Wang}, Kai and {Hu}, Chen and {Qiu}, Jie and {Li}, Yan-Rong and\n {Fan}, Xu-Liang and {Fang}, Xiang-Er and {Bai}, Jin-Ming and\n {Bian}, Wei-Hao and {Yuan}, Ye-Fei and {Ho}, Luis C. and\n {Wang}, Jian-Min and {SEAMBH Collaboration}},\n title = \"{Supermassive Black Holes with High Accretion Rates in Active Galactic Nuclei. V. A New Size-Luminosity Scaling Relation for the Broad-line Region}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = \"2016\",\n month = \"Jul\",\n volume = {825},\n number = {2},\n eid = {126},\n pages = {126},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/126},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1604.06218},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825..126D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{DuPu2018,\n author = {{Du}, Pu and {Zhang}, Zhi-Xiang and {Wang}, Kai and {Huang}, Ying-Ke and\n {Zhang}, Yue and {Lu}, Kai-Xing and {Hu}, Chen and {Li}, Yan-Rong and\n {Bai}, Jin-Ming and {Bian}, Wei-Hao and {Yuan}, Ye-Fei and\n {Ho}, Luis C. and {Wang}, Jian-Min and {SEAMBH Collaboration}},\n title = \"{Supermassive Black Holes with High Accretion Rates in Active Galactic Nuclei. IX. 10 New Observations of Reverberation Mapping and Shortened H{\\ensuremath{\\beta}} Lags}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, quasars: supermassive black holes, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = \"2018\",\n month = \"Mar\",\n volume = {856},\n number = {1},\n eid = {6},\n pages = {6},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aaae6b},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1802.03022},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856....6D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Dupu2019,\n author = {{Du}, Pu and {Wang}, Jian-Min},\n title = \"{The Radius-Luminosity Relationship Depends on Optical Spectra in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active galactic nuclei, Active galaxies, Reverberation mapping, Supermassive black holes, Quasars, 16, 17, 2019, 1663, 1319, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = nov,\n volume = {886},\n number = {1},\n eid = {42},\n pages = {42},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab4908},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1909.06735},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886...42D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{grier2017,\n author = {{Grier}, C.~J. and {Trump}, J.~R. and {Shen}, Yue and {Horne}, Keith and\n {Kinemuchi}, Karen and {McGreer}, Ian D. and {Starkey}, D.~A. and {Brand\n t}, W.~N. and {Hall}, P.~B. and {Kochanek}, C.~S. and {Chen}, Yuguang and\n {Denney}, K.~D. and {Greene}, Jenny E. and {Ho}, L.~C. and\n {Homayouni}, Y. and {I-Hsiu Li}, Jennifer and {Pei}, Liuyi and\n {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Petitjean}, P. and {Schneider}, D.~P. and\n {Sun}, Mouyuan and {AlSayyad}, Yusura and {Bizyaev}, Dmitry and\n {Brinkmann}, Jonathan and {Brownstein}, Joel R. and {Bundy}, Kevin and\n {Dawson}, K.~S. and {Eftekharzadeh}, Sarah and {Fernand\n ez-Trincado}, J.~G. and {Gao}, Yang and {Hutchinson}, Timothy A. and\n {Jia}, Siyao and {Jiang}, Linhua and {Oravetz}, Daniel and\n {Pan}, Kaike and {Paris}, Isabelle and {Ponder}, Kara A. and\n {Peters}, Christina and {Rogerson}, Jesse and {Simmons}, Audrey and\n {Smith}, Robyn and {Wang}, Ran},\n title = \"{The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: H{\\ensuremath{\\alpha}} and H{\\ensuremath{\\beta}} Reverberation Measurements from First-year Spectroscopy and Photometry}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = \"2017\",\n month = \"Dec\",\n volume = {851},\n number = {1},\n eid = {21},\n pages = {21},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aa98dc},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1711.03114},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...851...21G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{martinez2019,\n author = {{Mart{\\'\\i}nez-Aldama}, Mary Loli and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and\n {Kawka}, Damian and {Karas}, Vladimir and {Panda}, Swayamtrupta and\n {Zaja{\\v{c}}ek}, Michal and {{\\.Z}ycki}, Piotr T.},\n title = \"{Can Reverberation-measured Quasars Be Used for Cosmology?}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {Reverberation mapping, Cosmology, Active galaxies, Quasars, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = \"2019\",\n month = \"Oct\",\n volume = {883},\n number = {2},\n eid = {170},\n pages = {170},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab3728},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1903.09687},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...883..170M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{rakshit2019,\n author = {{Rakshit}, Suvendu and {Woo}, Jong-Hak and {Gallo}, Elena and\n {Hodges-Kluck}, Edmund and {Shin}, Jaejin and {Jeon}, Yiseul and\n {Bae}, Hyun-Jin and {Baldassare}, Vivienne and {Cho}, Hojin and\n {Cho}, Wanjin and {Foord}, Adi and {Kang}, Daeun and {Kang}, Wonseok and\n {Karouzos}, Marios and {Kim}, Minjin and {Kim}, Taewoo and\n {Le}, Huynh Anh N. and {Park}, Daeseong and {Park}, Songyoun and\n {Son}, Donghoon and {Sung}, Hyun-il and {Bennert}, Vardha N. and\n {Malkan}, Matthew A.},\n title = \"{The Seoul National University AGN Monitoring Project. II. BLR Size and Black Hole Mass of Two AGNs}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = \"2019\",\n month = \"Dec\",\n volume = {886},\n number = {2},\n eid = {93},\n pages = {93},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab49fd},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1910.02412},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886...93R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{panda2019FrASS,\n author = {{Panda}, Swayamtrupta and {Mart{\\'\\i}nez-Aldama}, Mary Loli and\n {Zaja{\\v{c}}ek}, Michal},\n title = \"{Current and future applications of Reverberation-mapped quasars in Cosmology}\",\n journal = {Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences},\n keywords = {quasars: reverberation mapping, time-delay measurements, cosmology, instrument: LSST, Photometry, spectroscopy, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = dec,\n volume = {6},\n eid = {75},\n pages = {75},\n doi = {10.3389/fspas.2019.00075},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1909.05572},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019FrASS...6...75P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{mizumoto2019,\n author = {{Mizumoto}, Misaki and {Done}, Chris and {Tomaru}, Ryota and\n {Edwards}, Isaac},\n title = \"{Thermally driven wind as the origin of warm absorbers in AGN}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: nuclei, quasars: general, X-rays: galaxies, X-rays: ISM, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2019,\n month = oct,\n volume = {489},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1152-1160},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz2225},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1907.01447},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.1152M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{waters2016,\n author = {{Waters}, Tim and {Kashi}, Amit and {Proga}, Daniel and {Eracleous}, Michael and {Barth}, Aaron J. and {Greene}, Jenny},\n title = \"{Reverberation Mapping of the Broad Line Region: Application to a Hydrodynamical Line-driven Disk Wind Solution}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, line: profiles, quasars: emission lines, hydrodynamics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = aug,\n volume = {827},\n number = {1},\n eid = {53},\n pages = {53},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/53},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1601.05181},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827...53W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{WatersProga2016,\n author = {{Waters}, Tim and {Proga}, Daniel},\n title = \"{On the efficient acceleration of clouds in active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {hydrodynamics, instabilities, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2016,\n month = jul,\n volume = {460},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L79-L83},\n doi = {10.1093/mnrasl/slw056},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1603.01915},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460L..79W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{icke1980,\n author = {{Icke}, V.},\n title = \"{Gas flow above an alpha disk}\",\n journal = {\\aj},\n keywords = {Gas Flow, Gravitational Effects, Stellar Atmospheres, Stellar Mass Accretion, Acceleration (Physics), Disks (Shapes), Flow Distribution, Flow Equations, Numerical Flow Visualization, Stellar Luminosity, Astrophysics},\n year = 1980,\n month = mar,\n volume = {85},\n pages = {329-347},\n doi = {10.1086/112678},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980AJ.....85..329I},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{zajacek2021,\n author = {{Zaja{\\v{c}}ek}, Michal and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Martinez-Aldama}, Mary Loli and {Ra{\\l}owski}, Mateusz and {Olejak}, Aleksandra and {Przy{\\l}uski}, Robert and {Panda}, Swayamtrupta and {Hryniewicz}, Krzysztof and {{\\'S}niegowska}, Marzena and {Naddaf}, Mohammad-Hassan and {Prince}, Raj and {Pych}, Wojtek and {Pietrzy{\\'n}ski}, Grzegorz and {Sobrino Figaredo}, Catalina and {Haas}, Martin and {{\\'S}redzi{\\'n}ska}, Justyna and {Krupa}, Magdalena and {Kurcz}, Agnieszka and {Udalski}, Andrzej and {Karas}, Vladim{\\'\\i}r and {Sarna}, Marek and {Worters}, Hannah L. and {Sefako}, Ramotholo R. and {Genade}, Anja},\n title = \"{Time Delay of Mg II Emission Response for the Luminous Quasar HE 0435-4312: toward Application of the High-accretor Radius-Luminosity Relation in Cosmology}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Accretion, Galaxy accretion disks, Active galactic nuclei, Quasars, Emission line galaxies, Reverberation mapping, Galaxy spectroscopy, Galaxy photometry, 14, 562, 16, 1319, 459, 2019, 2171, 611, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = may,\n volume = {912},\n number = {1},\n eid = {10},\n pages = {10},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/abe9b2},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2012.12409},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...912...10Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{zajacek2020,\n author = {{Zaja{\\v{c}}ek}, Michal and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Martinez-Aldama}, Mary Loli and {Ra{\\l}owski}, Mateusz and {Olejak}, Aleksandra and {Panda}, Swayamtrupta and {Hryniewicz}, Krzysztof and {{\\'S}niegowska}, Marzena and {Naddaf}, Mohammad-Hassan and {Pych}, Wojtek and {Pietrzy{\\'n}ski}, Grzegorz and {Sobrino Figaredo}, C. and {Haas}, Martin and {{\\'S}redzi{\\'n}ska}, Justyna and {Krupa}, Magdalena and {Kurcz}, Agnieszka and {Udalski}, Andrzej and {Gorski}, Marek and {Sarna}, Marek},\n title = \"{Time-delay Measurement of Mg II Broad-line Response for the Highly Accreting Quasar HE 0413-4031: Implications for the Mg II-based Radius-Luminosity Relation}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Radio-loud quasars, 14, 17, 1319, 1349, 1663, 1558, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology},\n year = 2020,\n month = jun,\n volume = {896},\n number = {2},\n eid = {146},\n pages = {146},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab94ae},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2005.09071},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...896..146Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@BOOK{adhikari2019book,\n author = {{Adhikari}, Tek Prasad},\n title = \"{Photoionization Modelling as a Density Diagnostic of Line Emitting/Absorbing Regions in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n year = \"2019\",\n Publisher = {Springer International Publishing},\n doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-22737-1},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019pmdd.book.....A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{markowitz2014,\n author = {{Markowitz}, A.~G. and {Krumpe}, M. and {Nikutta}, R.},\n title = \"{First X-ray-based statistical tests for clumpy-torus models: eclipse events from 230 years of monitoring of Seyfert AGN}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, X-rays: galaxies, Astrophysics - Galaxy Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2014,\n month = apr,\n volume = {439},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1403-1458},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt2492},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1402.2779},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.439.1403M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{peisker2020,\n author = {{Pei{\\ss}ker}, Florian and {Eckart}, Andreas and {Sabha}, Nadeen B. and {Zaja{\\v{c}}ek}, Michal and {Bhat}, Harshitha},\n title = \"{Near- and Mid-infrared Observations in the Inner Tenth of a Parsec of the Galactic Center Detection of Proper Motion of a Filament Very Close to Sgr A*}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {565, 833, 834, 837, 836, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = jul,\n volume = {897},\n number = {1},\n eid = {28},\n pages = {28},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab9826},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2006.03648},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...897...28P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{shin2008,\n author = {{Shin}, Min-Su and {Stone}, James M. and {Snyder}, Gregory F.},\n title = \"{The Magnetohydrodynamics of Shock-Cloud Interaction in Three Dimensions}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {ISM: clouds, ISM: kinematics and dynamics, magnetic fields, MHD, shock waves, supernova remnants, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = jun,\n volume = {680},\n number = {1},\n pages = {336-348},\n doi = {10.1086/587775},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0802.2708},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...680..336S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{mccourt2015,\n author = {{McCourt}, Michael and {O'Leary}, Ryan M. and {Madigan}, Ann-Marie and {Quataert}, Eliot},\n title = \"{Magnetized gas clouds can survive acceleration by a hot wind}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {MHD, plasmas, ISM: clouds, Galaxy: centre, Galaxy: halo, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = may,\n volume = {449},\n number = {1},\n pages = {2-7},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv355},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1409.6719},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449....2M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{clavel1989,\n author = {{Clavel}, J. and {Wamsteker}, W. and {Glass}, I.~S.},\n title = \"{Hot Dust on the Outskirts of the Broad-Line Region in Fairall 9}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Cosmic Dust, Infrared Sources (Astronomy), Seyfert Galaxies, Spectral Energy Distribution, Ultraviolet Spectra, Continuous Spectra, Light Curve, Line Spectra, Near Infrared Radiation, Astrophysics, GALAXIES: INDIVIDUAL NAME: FAIRALL 9, GALAXIES: SEYFERT, INFRARED: SOURCES, ULTRAVIOLET: SPECTRA},\n year = 1989,\n month = feb,\n volume = {337},\n pages = {236},\n doi = {10.1086/167100},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...337..236C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{netzer2007,\n author = {{Netzer}, Hagai and {Lutz}, Dieter and {Schweitzer}, Mario and {Contursi}, Alessandra and {Sturm}, Eckhard and {Tacconi}, Linda J. and {Veilleux}, Sylvain and {Kim}, D. -C. and {Rupke}, David and {Baker}, Andrew J. and {Dasyra}, Kalliopi and {Mazzarella}, Joseph and {Lord}, Steven},\n title = \"{Spitzer Quasar and ULIRG Evolution Study (QUEST). II. The Spectral Energy Distributions of Palomar-Green Quasars}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Starburst, Infrared: Galaxies, Galaxies: Quasars: Emission Lines, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = sep,\n volume = {666},\n number = {2},\n pages = {806-816},\n doi = {10.1086/520716},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0706.0818},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...666..806N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{proga2000,\n author = {{Proga}, Daniel and {Stone}, James M. and {Kallman}, Timothy R.},\n title = \"{Dynamics of Line-driven Disk Winds in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Accretion, Accretion Disks, Galaxies: Active, Hydrodynamics, Instabilities, Methods: Numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 2000,\n month = nov,\n volume = {543},\n number = {2},\n pages = {686-696},\n doi = {10.1086/317154},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0005315},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...543..686P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{proga2004,\n author = {{Proga}, Daniel and {Kallman}, Timothy R.},\n title = \"{Dynamics of Line-driven Disk Winds in Active Galactic Nuclei. II. Effects of Disk Radiation}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Accretion, Accretion Disks, Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Nuclei, Methods: Numerical, Galaxies: Quasars: General, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = dec,\n volume = {616},\n number = {2},\n pages = {688-695},\n doi = {10.1086/425117},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0408293},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...616..688P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{proga2007,\n author = {{Proga}, Daniel},\n title = \"{Dynamics of Accretion Flows Irradiated by a Quasar}\",\n journal = {ApJ},\n keywords = {Accretion, Accretion Disks, Methods: Numerical, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = jun,\n volume = {661},\n number = {2},\n pages = {693-702},\n doi = {10.1086/515389},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0702582},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...661..693P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Proga2015,\n author = {{Proga}, Daniel and {Waters}, Tim},\n title = \"{Cloud Formation and Acceleration in a Radiative Environment}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {hydrodynamics, instabilities, methods: numerical, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2015,\n month = may,\n volume = {804},\n number = {2},\n eid = {137},\n pages = {137},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/137},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1502.03106},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...804..137P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{MurrayChiang1995,\n author = {{Murray}, N. and {Chiang}, J.},\n title = \"{Active Galactic Nuclei Disk Winds, Absorption Lines, and Warm Absorbers}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: SEYFERT, GALAXIES: QUASARS: ABSORPTION LINES},\n year = 1995,\n month = dec,\n volume = {454},\n pages = {L105},\n doi = {10.1086/309775},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...454L.105M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{higginbottom2013,\n author = {{Higginbottom}, N. and {Knigge}, C. and {Long}, K.~S. and {Sim}, S.~A. and {Matthews}, J.~H.},\n title = \"{A simple disc wind model for broad absorption line quasars}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {radiative transfer, methods: numerical, galaxies: active, quasars: absorption lines, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = dec,\n volume = {436},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1390-1407},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt1658},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1308.5973},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436.1390H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{voit1992,\n author = {{Voit}, G.~M.},\n title = \"{Destruction and survival of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in active galaxies.}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Aromatic Compounds, Hydrocarbons, Infrared Spectra, Interstellar Matter, Starburst Galaxies, Active Galaxies, Cyclic Compounds, Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation, Photodissociation, X Ray Sources, Astrophysics},\n year = 1992,\n month = oct,\n volume = {258},\n pages = {841},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/258.4.841},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.258..841V},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{pereyra1997,\n author = {{Pereyra}, Nicolas Antonio and {Kallman}, Timothy R. and {Blondin}, John M.},\n title = \"{Hydrodynamical Models of Line-driven Accretion Disk Winds}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Accretion, Accretion Disks, Hydrodynamics, Stars: Novae, Cataclysmic Variables, Stars: Mass Loss},\n year = 1997,\n month = mar,\n volume = {477},\n number = {1},\n pages = {368-378},\n doi = {10.1086/303671},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...477..368P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{proga1998,\n author = {{Proga}, Daniel and {Stone}, James M. and {Drew}, Janet E.},\n title = \"{Radiation-driven winds from luminous accretion discs}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {Accretion Disks, Stellar Winds, Hydrodynamics, Radiation Pressure, Time Dependence, Cataclysmic Variables, Astrophysics, ACCRETION, ACCRETION DISCS, HYDRODYNAMICS, INSTABILITIES, METHODS: NUMERICAL, STARS: MASS-LOSS, NOVAE, CATACLYSMIC VARIABLES, Astrophysics},\n year = 1998,\n month = apr,\n volume = {295},\n number = {3},\n pages = {595-617},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01337.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9710305},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998MNRAS.295..595P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{proga1999,\n author = {{Proga}, Daniel and {Stone}, James M. and {Drew}, Janet E.},\n title = \"{Line-driven disc wind models with an improved line force}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {ACCRETION, ACCRETION DISCS, HYDRODYNAMICS, METHODS: NUMERICAL, STARS: EARLY-TYPE, STARS: MASS-LOSS, GALAXIES: NUCLEI, Astrophysics},\n year = 1999,\n month = dec,\n volume = {310},\n number = {2},\n pages = {476-482},\n doi = {10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02935.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9907177},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.310..476P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{ohsuga2009,\n author = {{Ohsuga}, Ken and {Mineshige}, Shin and {Mori}, Masao and {Kato}, Yoshiaki},\n title = \"{Global Radiation-Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Black-Hole Accretion Flow and Outflow: Unified Model of Three States}\",\n journal = {\\pasj},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2009,\n month = jun,\n volume = {61},\n number = {3},\n pages = {L7-L11},\n doi = {10.1093/pasj/61.3.L7},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0903.5364},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009PASJ...61L...7O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{watarai1999,\n author = {{Watarai}, Ken-ya and {Fukue}, Jun},\n title = \"{Radiative Disk Winds from a Self-Similar Slim Disk}\",\n journal = {\\pasj},\n keywords = {ACCRETION DISKS, BLACK HOLES, RADIATION MECHANISMS, STARS: WINDS},\n year = 1999,\n month = oct,\n volume = {51},\n pages = {725},\n doi = {10.1093/pasj/51.5.725},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999PASJ...51..725W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{hirai2001,\n author = {{Hirai}, Yasuo and {Fukue}, Jun},\n title = \"{Radiatively-Driven Relativistic Accretion Disk Winds}\",\n journal = {\\pasj},\n keywords = {ACCRETION, ACCRETION DISKS, ACCRETION-DISK WINDS, BLACK HOLE PHYSICS, RADIATION DRAG-- X-RAYS: STARS},\n year = 2001,\n month = apr,\n volume = {53},\n number = {2},\n pages = {285-292},\n doi = {10.1093/pasj/53.2.285},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001PASJ...53..285H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{konigl1994,\n author = {{Konigl}, Arieh and {Kartje}, John F.},\n title = \"{Disk-driven Hydromagnetic Winds as a Key Ingredient of Active Galactic Nuclei Unification Schemes}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Accretion Disks, Active Galactic Nuclei, Astronomical Models, Bl Lacertae Objects, Computerized Simulation, Jet Flow, Magnetohydrodynamic Flow, Quasars, Seyfert Galaxies, Stellar Winds, Cosmic Dust, Infrared Spectra, Photoionization, Radiative Transfer, Radio Emission, Ultraviolet Spectra, X Ray Spectra, Astrophysics, ACCRETION, ACCRETION DISKS, GALAXIES: ACTIVE, GALAXIES: JETS, GALAXIES: NUCLEI, GALAXIES: SEYFERT, MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS: MHD},\n year = 1994,\n month = oct,\n volume = {434},\n pages = {446},\n doi = {10.1086/174746},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...434..446K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{mizumoto2021,\n author = {{Mizumoto}, Misaki and {Nomura}, Mariko and {Done}, Chris and {Ohsuga}, Ken and {Odaka}, Hirokazu},\n title = \"{UV line-driven disc wind as the origin of UltraFast Outflows in AGN}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: individual: PG 1211+143, galaxies: Seyfert, X-rays: galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2021,\n month = may,\n volume = {503},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1442-1458},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa3282},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2003.01137},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503.1442M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{kartje1999,\n author = {{Kartje}, John F. and {K{\\\"o}nigl}, Arieh and {Elitzur}, Moshe},\n title = \"{Megamaser Disks in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: INDIVIDUAL: NGC NUMBER: NGC 1068, GALAXIES: INDIVIDUAL: NGC NUMBER: NGC 4258, GALAXIES: NUCLEI, GALAXIES: SEYFERT, MASERS, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 1068, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 4258, Galaxies: Nuclei, Galaxies: Seyfert, Masers, Astrophysics},\n year = 1999,\n month = mar,\n volume = {513},\n number = {1},\n pages = {180-196},\n doi = {10.1086/306824},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9810195},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...513..180K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{donea2002,\n author = {{Donea}, Alina-C. and {Protheroe}, Raymond J.},\n title = \"{Radiation Fields in Blazars - a Possible Extension of the Small Scale Symbiosis (Disk/Jet) into a Large Scale (Dust/Dust) Symbiosis}\",\n journal = {\\pasa},\n keywords = {proton blazar model, accretion disks, dust torus, broad line region, jet},\n year = 2002,\n month = jan,\n volume = {19},\n number = {1},\n pages = {39-42},\n doi = {10.1071/AS01098},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002PASA...19...39D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{hagino2015,\n author = {{Hagino}, Kouichi and {Odaka}, Hirokazu and {Done}, Chris and {Gandhi}, Poshak and {Watanabe}, Shin and {Sako}, Masao and {Takahashi}, Tadayuki},\n title = \"{The origin of ultrafast outflows in AGN: Monte Carlo simulations of the wind in PDS 456}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {black hole physics, radiative transfer, galaxies: active, galaxies: individual: PDS 456, X-rays: galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2015,\n month = jan,\n volume = {446},\n number = {1},\n pages = {663-676},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu2095},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1410.1640},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.446..663H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{miniutti2013,\n author = {{Miniutti}, G. and {Saxton}, R.~D. and {Rodr{\\'\\i}guez-Pascual}, P.~M. and {Read}, A.~M. and {Esquej}, P. and {Colless}, M. and {Dobbie}, P. and {Spolaor}, M.},\n title = \"{A high Eddington-ratio, true Seyfert 2 galaxy candidate: implications for broad-line region models}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, X-rays: galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2013,\n month = aug,\n volume = {433},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1764-1777},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt850},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1305.3284},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.1764M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{nomura2013,\n author = {{Nomura}, Mariko and {Ohsuga}, Ken and {Wada}, Keiichi and {Susa}, Hajime and {Misawa}, Toru},\n title = \"{Modeling Line-Driven Disk Wind for Broad Absorption Lines of Quasars}\",\n journal = {\\pasj},\n keywords = {accretion: accretion disks, galaxies: active, methods: numerical, quasars: absorption lines, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = apr,\n volume = {65},\n eid = {40},\n pages = {40},\n doi = {10.1093/pasj/65.2.40},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1212.3075},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASJ...65...40N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{sim2010,\n author = {{Sim}, S.~A. and {Proga}, D. and {Miller}, L. and {Long}, K.~S. and {Turner}, T.~J.},\n title = \"{Multidimensional modelling of X-ray spectra for AGN accretion disc outflows - III. Application to a hydrodynamical simulation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {radiative transfer, methods: numerical, galaxies: active, X-rays: galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2010,\n month = nov,\n volume = {408},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1396-1408},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17215.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1006.3449},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408.1396S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{nomura2020,\n author = {{Nomura}, Mariko and {Ohsuga}, Ken and {Done}, Chris},\n title = \"{Line-driven disc wind in near-Eddington active galactic nuclei: decrease of mass accretion rate due to powerful outflow}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, methods: numerical, galaxies: active, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2020,\n month = may,\n volume = {494},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3616-3626},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa948},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1811.01966},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.3616N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{huang2020,\n author = {{Huang}, Xiaoshan and {Davis}, Shane W. and {Zhang}, Dong},\n title = \"{Dusty Cloud Acceleration with Multiband Radiation}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {572, 2009, 1967, 767, 848, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = apr,\n volume = {893},\n number = {1},\n eid = {50},\n pages = {50},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab811b},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1908.01775},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...893...50H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{ribas2019b,\n author = {{Mas-Ribas}, Llu{\\'\\i}s and {Mauland}, Renate},\n title = \"{The Ubiquitous Imprint of Radiative Acceleration in the Mean Absorption Spectrum of Quasar Outflows}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active galactic nuclei, AGN host galaxies, Galaxy formation, Interstellar scattering, Quasar absorption line spectroscopy, Broad-absorption line quasar, 1317, 2017, 595, 854, 183, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = dec,\n volume = {886},\n number = {2},\n eid = {151},\n pages = {151},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab4efd},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1902.04085},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886..151M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{ribas2019a,\n author = {{Mas-Ribas}, Llu{\\'\\i}s},\n title = \"{Radiation-pressure Waves and Multiphase Quasar Outflows}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: nuclei, ISM: jets and outflows, ISM: structure, quasars: absorption lines, quasars: supermassive black holes, waves, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = nov,\n volume = {885},\n number = {1},\n eid = {95},\n pages = {95},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab4181},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1903.08170},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...885...95M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{zhang2021,\n author = {{Zhang}, Xiaer and {He}, Zhicheng and {Wang}, Tinggui and {Guo}, Hengxiao},\n title = \"{The Deviation of the Broad-line Region Size Between Reverberation Mapping and Spectroastrometry}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2021,\n month = apr,\n eid = {arXiv:2104.11417},\n pages = {arXiv:2104.11417},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2104.11417},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021arXiv210411417Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{matthews2020,\n author = {{Matthews}, James H. and {Knigge}, Christian and {Higginbottom}, Nick and {Long}, Knox S. and {Sim}, Stuart A. and {Mangham}, Samuel W. and {Parkinson}, Edward J. and {Hewitt}, Henrietta A.},\n title = \"{Stratified disc wind models for the AGN broad-line region: ultraviolet, optical, and X-ray properties}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, line: formation, radiative transfer, galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = mar,\n volume = {492},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5540-5560},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa136},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2001.03625},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.5540M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{davis2014,\n author = {{Davis}, Shane W. and {Jiang}, Yan-Fei and {Stone}, James M. and {Murray}, Norman},\n title = \"{Radiation Feedback in ULIRGs: Are Photons Movers and Shakers?}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: ISM, hydrodynamics, ISM: jets and outflows, methods: numerical, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2014,\n month = dec,\n volume = {796},\n number = {2},\n eid = {107},\n pages = {107},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/107},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1403.1874},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...796..107D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{tsang2015,\n author = {{Tsang}, Benny T. -H. and {Milosavljevi{\\'c}}, Milo{\\v{s}}},\n title = \"{Radiation pressure driving of a dusty atmosphere}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {hydrodynamics, radiative transfer, methods: numerical, stars: formation, ISM: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: star formation, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = oct,\n volume = {453},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1108-1120},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv1707},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1506.05121},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453.1108T},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{zhang2017,\n author = {{Zhang}, Dong and {Davis}, Shane W.},\n title = \"{Radiation Hydrodynamic Simulations of Dust-driven Winds}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: ISM, hydrodynamics, ISM: jets and outflows, methods: numerical, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = apr,\n volume = {839},\n number = {1},\n eid = {54},\n pages = {54},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aa6935},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1612.00022},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...839...54Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{zhang2018,\n author = {{Zhang}, Dong and {Davis}, Shane W. and {Jiang}, Yan-Fei and {Stone}, James M.},\n title = \"{Dusty Cloud Acceleration by Radiation Pressure in Rapidly Star-forming Galaxies}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: ISM, hydrodynamics, ISM: jets and outflows, methods: numerical, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = feb,\n volume = {854},\n number = {2},\n eid = {110},\n pages = {110},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aaa8e4},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1708.02946},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...854..110Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{dorodnitsyn2012,\n author = {{Dorodnitsyn}, A. and {Kallman}, T. and {Bisnovatyi-Kogan}, G.~S.},\n title = \"{AGN Obscuration through Dusty, Infrared-dominated Flows. II. Multidimensional, Radiation-hydrodynamics Modeling}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {acceleration of particles, galaxies: active, hydrodynamics, methods: numerical, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2012,\n month = mar,\n volume = {747},\n number = {1},\n eid = {8},\n pages = {8},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/8},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1111.2103},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...747....8D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{chan2016,\n author = {{Chan}, Chi-Ho and {Krolik}, Julian H.},\n title = \"{Radiation-driven Outflows from and Radiative Support in Dusty Tori of Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, hydrodynamics, methods: numerical, quasars: general, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = jul,\n volume = {825},\n number = {1},\n eid = {67},\n pages = {67},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/67},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1511.00333},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825...67C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{chan2017,\n author = {{Chan}, Chi-Ho and {Krolik}, Julian H.},\n title = \"{Geometrically Thick Obscuration by Radiation-driven Outflow from Magnetized Tori of Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, magnetohydrodynamics: MHD, methods: numerical, quasars: general, radiative transfer, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = jul,\n volume = {843},\n number = {1},\n eid = {58},\n pages = {58},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aa76e4},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1706.00240},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843...58C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{williamson2019,\n author = {{Williamson}, David and {H{\\\"o}nig}, Sebastian and {Venanzi}, Marta},\n title = \"{3D Radiation Hydrodynamics of a Dynamical Torus}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, infrared: galaxies, radiation: dynamics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = may,\n volume = {876},\n number = {2},\n eid = {137},\n pages = {137},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab17d5},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1812.07448},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876..137W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{leftley2019,\n author = {{Leftley}, James H. and {H{\\\"o}nig}, Sebastian F. and {Asmus}, Daniel and {Tristram}, Konrad R.~W. and {Gandhi}, Poshak and {Kishimoto}, Makoto and {Venanzi}, Marta and {Williamson}, David J.},\n title = \"{Parsec-scale Dusty Winds in Active Galactic Nuclei: Evidence for Radiation Pressure Driving}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active galactic nuclei, Long baseline interferometry, Interferometry, Dust continuum emission, 16, 932, 808, 412, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = nov,\n volume = {886},\n number = {1},\n eid = {55},\n pages = {55},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a0b},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1910.00600},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886...55L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{artymowicz1993a,\n author = {{Artymowicz}, Pawel and {Lin}, D.~N.~C. and {Wampler}, E.~J.},\n title = \"{Star Trapping and Metallicity Enrichment in Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Interstellar Gas, Metallicity, Quasars, Stellar Motions, Trapping, Accretion Disks, Red Shift, Supernova Remnants, Astrophysics, GALAXIES: ABUNDANCES, GALAXIES: ACTIVE, GALAXIES: QUASARS: GENERAL, GALAXIES: STELLAR CONTENT, ISM: SUPERNOVA REMNANTS},\n year = 1993,\n month = jun,\n volume = {409},\n pages = {592},\n doi = {10.1086/172690},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...409..592A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{artymowicz1993b,\n author = {{Artymowicz}, Pawel},\n title = \"{Metallicity in Quasar/AGN Environment: A Consequence of Usual or Unusual Star Formation?}\",\n journal = {\\pasp},\n keywords = {Active Galactic Nuclei, Heavy Elements, Quasars, Red Shift, Star Formation, Abundance, Massive Stars, Metallicity, Astrophysics, GALAXIES: ACTIVE, QUASARS: GENERAL, STARS: FORMATION},\n year = 1993,\n month = sep,\n volume = {105},\n pages = {1032},\n doi = {10.1086/133278},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993PASP..105.1032A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{hamann1992,\n author = {{Hamann}, Fred and {Ferland}, Gary},\n title = \"{The Age and Chemical Evolution of High-Redshift QSOs}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Chemical Evolution, Galactic Evolution, Interstellar Chemistry, Quasars, Abundance, Astronomical Models, Astronomical Spectroscopy, Carbon, Nitrogen, Red Shift, Astrophysics, COSMOLOGY: OBSERVATIONS, GALAXIES: ABUNDANCES, GALAXIES: QUASARS: EMISSION LINES, ISM: ABUNDANCES, LINE: FORMATION, STARS: EVOLUTION},\n year = 1992,\n month = jun,\n volume = {391},\n pages = {L53},\n doi = {10.1086/186397},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...391L..53H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{sniegowska2020,\n author = {{{\\'S}niegowska}, Marzena and {Marziani}, Paola and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Panda}, Swayamtrupta and {Mart{\\'\\i}nez-Aldama}, Mary Loli and {del Olmo}, Ascensi{\\'o}n and {D'Onofrio}, Mauro},\n title = \"{High Metal Content of Highly Accreting Quasars}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Quasars, Active galactic nuclei, Radio quiet quasars, 1319, 16, 1354, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = apr,\n volume = {910},\n number = {2},\n eid = {115},\n pages = {115},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/abe1c8},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2009.14177},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...910..115S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n@ARTICLE{xu2018,\n author = {{Xu}, Fei and {Bian}, Fuyan and {Shen}, Yue and {Zuo}, Wenwen and {Fan}, Xiaohui and {Zhu}, Zonghong},\n title = \"{The evolution of chemical abundance in quasar broad line region}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: abundances, galaxies: active, galaxies: high redshift, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = oct,\n volume = {480},\n number = {1},\n pages = {345-357},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty1763},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1807.01978},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480..345X},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{castro2017,\n author = {{Castro}, C.~S. and {Dors}, O.~L. and {Cardaci}, M.~V. and {H{\\\"a}gele}, G.~F.},\n title = \"{New metallicity calibration for Seyfert 2 galaxies based on the N2O2 index}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: abundances, galaxies: evolution, galaxies: formation, galaxies: general, galaxies: ISM, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = may,\n volume = {467},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1507-1514},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stx150},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1701.04997},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.1507C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{DuPu2014,\n author = {{Du}, Pu and {Wang}, Jian-Min and {Hu}, Chen and {Valls-Gabaud}, David and {Baldwin}, Jack A. and {Ge}, Jun-Qiang and {Xue}, Sui-Jian},\n title = \"{Outflows from active galactic nuclei: the BLR-NLR metallicity correlation}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, black hole physics, ISM: jets and outflows, galaxies: abundances, galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2014,\n month = mar,\n volume = {438},\n number = {4},\n pages = {2828-2838},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt2386},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1312.3212},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438.2828D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{dietrich2003,\n author = {{Dietrich}, M. and {Hamann}, F. and {Shields}, J.~C. and {Constantin}, A. and {Heidt}, J. and {J{\\\"a}ger}, K. and {Vestergaard}, M. and {Wagner}, S.~J.},\n title = \"{Quasar Elemental Abundances at High Redshifts}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Abundances, Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Evolution- Galaxies: High-Redshift, Galaxies: Quasars: General, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = jun,\n volume = {589},\n number = {2},\n pages = {722-732},\n doi = {10.1086/374662},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0302494},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...589..722D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{warner2002,\n author = {{Warner}, Craig and {Hamann}, Fred and {Shields}, Joseph C. and {Constantin}, Anca and {Foltz}, Craig B. and {Chaffee}, Frederic H.},\n title = \"{The Metallicity of the Redshift 4.16 Quasar BR 2248-1242}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Formation, Galaxies: Quasars: Emission Lines, Galaxies: Quasars: Individual: Alphanumeric: BR 2248-1242, Astrophysics},\n year = 2002,\n month = mar,\n volume = {567},\n number = {1},\n pages = {68-72},\n doi = {10.1086/338575},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0111002},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...567...68W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{hamann1997,\n author = {{Hamann}, Fred},\n title = \"{Metal Abundances and Ionization in Quasar Intrinsic Absorbers}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: ABUNDANCES, GALAXY: EVOLUTION, GALAXIES: QUASARS: ABSORPTION LINES, GALAXIES: GENERAL, Galaxies: Abundances, galaxy: evolution, Galaxies: Quasars: Absorption Lines, Galaxies: Quasars: General, Astrophysics},\n year = 1997,\n month = jan,\n volume = {109},\n number = {2},\n pages = {279-305},\n doi = {10.1086/312980},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9704249},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJS..109..279H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{ferland1996,\n author = {{Ferland}, Gary J. and {Baldwin}, Jack A. and {Korista}, Kirk T. and {Hamann}, Fred and {Carswell}, R.~F. and {Phillips}, Mark and {Wilkes}, Belinda and {Williams}, Robert E.},\n title = \"{High Metal Enrichments in Luminous Quasars}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: ABUNDANCES, GALAXIES: QUASARS: INDIVIDUAL ALPHANUMERIC: Q0207-398, GALAXIES: QUASARS: EMISSION LINES},\n year = 1996,\n month = apr,\n volume = {461},\n pages = {683},\n doi = {10.1086/177094},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...461..683F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{matteucci1993,\n author = {{Matteucci}, Francesca and {Padovani}, Paolo},\n title = \"{Chemical Evolution of Galaxies and Quasar Metallicities}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: ABUNDANCES, GALAXIES: ELLIPTICAL AND LENTICULAR, CD, GALAXIES: EVOLUTION, GALAXIES: QUASARS: GENERAL},\n year = 1993,\n month = dec,\n volume = {419},\n pages = {485},\n doi = {10.1086/173502},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...419..485M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@BOOK{Rybicki1986,\n author = {{Rybicki}, George B. and {Lightman}, Alan P.},\n title = \"{Radiative Processes in Astrophysics}\",\n year = 1986,\n Publisher = {Wiley-VCH},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986rpa..book.....R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n} \n\n@ARTICLE{smith2005,\n author = {{Smith}, J.~E. and {Robinson}, A. and {Young}, S. and {Axon}, D.~J. and {Corbett}, Elizabeth A.},\n title = \"{Equatorial scattering and the structure of the broad-line region in Seyfert nuclei: evidence for a rotating disc}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {polarization, scattering, galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics},\n year = 2005,\n month = may,\n volume = {359},\n number = {3},\n pages = {846-864},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08895.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0501640},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.359..846S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{smith2004,\n author = {{Smith}, J.~E. and {Robinson}, A. and {Alexander}, D.~M. and {Young}, S. and {Axon}, D.~J. and {Corbett}, Elizabeth A.},\n title = \"{Seyferts on the edge: polar scattering and orientation-dependent polarization in Seyfert 1 nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {polarization, scattering, galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = may,\n volume = {350},\n number = {1},\n pages = {140-160},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07610.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0401496},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.350..140S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{lira2020,\n author = {{Lira}, P. and {Goosmann}, R.~W. and {Kishimoto}, M. and {Cartier}, R.},\n title = \"{The polarized signal from broad emission lines in AGNs}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {polarization, methods: numerical, galaxies: active, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2020,\n month = jan,\n volume = {491},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1-12},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz2774},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1906.08718},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491....1L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{capetti2021,\n author = {{Capetti}, Alessandro and {Laor}, Ari and {Baldi}, Ranieri D. and {Robinson}, Andrew and {Marconi}, Alessandro},\n title = \"{Spectropolarimetry of low redshift quasars: origin of the polarization and implications for black hole mass estimates}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, quasars: supermassive black holes, polarization, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = apr,\n volume = {502},\n number = {4},\n pages = {5086-5103},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stab279},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2102.05935},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.502.5086C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{almeida2017,\n author = {{Ramos Almeida}, Cristina and {Ricci}, Claudio},\n title = \"{Nuclear obscuration in active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {Nature Astronomy},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2017,\n month = oct,\n volume = {1},\n pages = {679-689},\n doi = {10.1038/s41550-017-0232-z},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1709.00019},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017NatAs...1..679R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{arredondo2021,\n author = {{Esparza-Arredondo}, D. and {Gonzalez-Mart{\\'\\i}n}, O. and {Dultzin}, D. and {Masegosa}, J. and {Ramos-Almeida}, C. and {Garc{\\'\\i}a-Bernete}, I. and {Fritz}, J. and {Osorio-Clavijo}, N.},\n title = \"{The dust-gas AGN torus as constrained from X-ray and mid-infrared observations}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, X-rays: galaxies, infrared: galaxies, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = jul,\n volume = {651},\n eid = {A91},\n pages = {A91},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202040043},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2104.11263},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...651A..91E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{kovacevic2015,\n author = {{Kova{\\v{c}}evi{\\'c}-Doj{\\v{c}}inovi{\\'c}}, Jelena and {Popovi{\\'c}}, Luka {\\v{C}}.},\n title = \"{The Connections Between the UV and Optical Fe ii Emission Lines in Type 1 AGNs}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = dec,\n volume = {221},\n number = {2},\n eid = {35},\n pages = {35},\n doi = {10.1088/0067-0049/221/2/35},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1509.03679},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..221...35K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{popovic2019,\n author = {{Popovi{\\'c}}, Luka {\\v{C}}. and {Kova{\\v{c}}evi{\\'c}-Doj{\\v{c}}inovi{\\'c}}, Jelena and {Mar{\\v{c}}eta-Mandi{\\'c}}, Sladjana},\n title = \"{The structure of the Mg II broad line emitting region in Type 1 AGNs}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = apr,\n volume = {484},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3180-3197},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stz157},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1901.03681},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.3180P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{naddaf2022,\n author = {{Naddaf}, M.~H. and {Czerny}, B.},\n title = \"{Radiation pressure on dust explaining the low ionized broad emission lines in active galactic nuclei. Dust as an important driver of line shape}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, radiation: dynamics, line: profiles, radiative transfer, galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2022,\n month = jul,\n volume = {663},\n eid = {A77},\n pages = {A77},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202142806},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2111.14963},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...663A..77N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{czerny2013,\n author = {{Czerny}, B. and {Hryniewicz}, K. and {Maity}, I. and {Schwarzenberg-Czerny}, A. and {{\\.Z}ycki}, P.~T. and {Bilicki}, M.},\n title = \"{Towards equation of state of dark energy from quasar monitoring: Reverberation strategy}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {quasars: emission lines, cosmological parameters, dark energy, accretion, accretion disks, black hole physics, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2013,\n month = aug,\n volume = {556},\n eid = {A97},\n pages = {A97},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201220832},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1212.0472},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...556A..97C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{watson2011,\n author = {{Watson}, D. and {Denney}, K.~D. and {Vestergaard}, M. and {Davis}, T.~M.},\n title = \"{A New Cosmological Distance Measure Using Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {cosmological parameters, cosmology: observations, distance scale, galaxies: Seyfert, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2011,\n month = oct,\n volume = {740},\n number = {2},\n eid = {L49},\n pages = {L49},\n doi = {10.1088/2041-8205/740/2/L49},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1109.4632},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...740L..49W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{bianchi2019,\n author = {{Bianchi}, Stefano and {Antonucci}, Robert and {Capetti}, Alessandro and {Chiaberge}, Marco and {Laor}, Ari and {Bassani}, Loredana and {Carrera}, Francisco J. and {La Franca}, Fabio and {Marinucci}, Andrea and {Matt}, Giorgio and {Middei}, Riccardo and {Panessa}, Francesca},\n title = \"{HST unveils a compact mildly relativistic broad-line region in the candidate true type 2 NGC 3147}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: individual: NGC3147, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = sep,\n volume = {488},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L1-L5},\n doi = {10.1093/mnrasl/slz080},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1905.09627},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488L...1B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{elitzur2009,\n author = {{Elitzur}, Moshe and {Ho}, Luis C.},\n title = \"{On the Disappearance of the Broad-Line Region in Low-Luminosity Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2009,\n month = aug,\n volume = {701},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L91-L94},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/L91},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0907.3752},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...701L..91E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{zajacek2018,\n author = {{Zaja{\\v{c}}ek}, Michal and {Tursunov}, Arman and {Eckart}, Andreas and {Britzen}, Silke},\n title = \"{On the charge of the Galactic centre black hole}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {black hole physics, radiation mechanisms: general, Galaxy: centre, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology},\n year = 2018,\n month = nov,\n volume = {480},\n number = {4},\n pages = {4408-4423},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sty2182},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1808.07327},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.4408Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{sabra2003,\n author = {{Sabra}, Bassem M. and {Shields}, Joseph C. and {Ho}, Luis C. and {Barth}, Aaron J. and {Filippenko}, Alexei V.},\n title = \"{Emission and Absorption in the M87 LINER}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Individual: Messier Number: M87, Galaxies: Nuclei, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = feb,\n volume = {584},\n number = {1},\n pages = {164-175},\n doi = {10.1086/345664},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0210391},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...584..164S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{eckart2017,\n author = {{Eckart}, Andreas and {H{\\\"u}ttemann}, Andreas and {Kiefer}, Claus and {Britzen}, Silke and {Zaja{\\v{c}}ek}, Michal and {L{\\\"a}mmerzahl}, Claus and {St{\\\"o}ckler}, Manfred and {Valencia-S}, Monica and {Karas}, Vladimir and {Garc{\\'\\i}a-Mar{\\'\\i}n}, Macarena},\n title = \"{The Milky Way's Supermassive Black Hole: How Good a Case Is It?}\",\n journal = {Foundations of Physics},\n keywords = {Black holes: mass, spin, charge, Sources: Sagittarus A*, Galaxies: active, Philosophy of science: (anti)realism, underdetermination, causality, Causality, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2017,\n month = may,\n volume = {47},\n number = {5},\n pages = {553-624},\n doi = {10.1007/s10701-017-0079-2},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1703.09118},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017FoPh...47..553E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{genzel2010,\n author = {{Genzel}, Reinhard and {Eisenhauer}, Frank and {Gillessen}, Stefan},\n title = \"{The Galactic Center massive black hole and nuclear star cluster}\",\n journal = {Reviews of Modern Physics},\n keywords = {98.35.Jk, Galactic center bar circumnuclear matter and bulge, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2010,\n month = oct,\n volume = {82},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3121-3195},\n doi = {10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3121},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1006.0064},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010RvMP...82.3121G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{naddaf2023,\n author = {{Naddaf}, M.~H. and {Martinez-Aldama}, M.~L. and {Marziani}, P. and {Panda}, S. and {Sniegowska}, M. and {Czerny}, B.},\n title = \"{Dust-driven wind as a model of broad absorption line quasars}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, quasars: absorption lines, galaxies: active, methods: data analysis, radiation: dynamics, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = jul,\n volume = {675},\n eid = {A43},\n pages = {A43},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202245698},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2212.08222},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...675A..43N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{popovic2020,\n author = {{Popovi{\\'c}}, Luka {\\v{C}}.},\n title = \"{Broad spectral lines in AGNs and supermassive black hole mass measurements}\",\n journal = {Open Astronomy},\n keywords = {acitve galactic nuclei, black holes, methods, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2020,\n month = may,\n volume = {29},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1-14},\n doi = {10.1515/astro-2020-0003},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1912.10502},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020OAst...29....1P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{mejia2018,\n author = {{Mej{\\'\\i}a-Restrepo}, J.~E. and {Lira}, P. and {Netzer}, H. and {Trakhtenbrot}, B. and {Capellupo}, D.~M.},\n title = \"{The effect of nuclear gas distribution on the mass determination of supermassive black holes}\",\n journal = {Nature Astronomy},\n keywords = {Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2018,\n month = nov,\n volume = {2},\n pages = {63-68},\n doi = {10.1038/s41550-017-0305-z},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1709.05345},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018NatAs...2...63M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{kollatschny2003,\n author = {{Kollatschny}, W.},\n title = \"{Accretion disk wind in the AGN broad-line region: Spectroscopically resolved line profile variations in Mrk 110}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, line: profiles, galaxies: Seyfert, galaxies: individual: Mrk 110, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = aug,\n volume = {407},\n pages = {461-472},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361:20030928},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0306389},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...407..461K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{hicks2008,\n author = {{Hicks}, Erin K.~S. and {Malkan}, Matthew A.},\n title = \"{Circumnuclear Gas in Seyfert 1 Galaxies: Morphology, Kinematics, and Direct Measurement of Black Hole Masses}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, infrared: galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 2008,\n month = jan,\n volume = {174},\n number = {1},\n pages = {31-73},\n doi = {10.1086/521650},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0707.0611},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJS..174...31H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{davies2006,\n author = {{Davies}, R.~I. and {Thomas}, J. and {Genzel}, R. and {M{\\\"u}ller S{\\'a}nchez}, F. and {Tacconi}, L.~J. and {Sternberg}, A. and {Eisenhauer}, F. and {Abuter}, R. and {Saglia}, R. and {Bender}, R.},\n title = \"{The Star-forming Torus and Stellar Dynamical Black Hole Mass in the Seyfert 1 Nucleus of NGC 3227}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 3227, Galaxies: Nuclei, Galaxies: Seyfert, Galaxies: Starburst, Infrared: Galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = aug,\n volume = {646},\n number = {2},\n pages = {754-773},\n doi = {10.1086/504963},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0604125},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...646..754D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{onken2007,\n author = {{Onken}, Christopher A. and {Valluri}, Monica and {Peterson}, Bradley M. and {Pogge}, Richard W. and {Bentz}, Misty C. and {Ferrarese}, Laura and {Vestergaard}, Marianne and {Crenshaw}, D. Michael and {Sergeev}, Sergey G. and {McHardy}, Ian M. and {Merritt}, David and {Bower}, Gary A. and {Heckman}, Timothy M. and {Wandel}, Amri},\n title = \"{The Black Hole Mass of NGC 4151: Comparison of Reverberation Mapping and Stellar Dynamical Measurements}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Black Hole Physics, Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Nuclei, Galaxies: Structure, Stellar Dynamics, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = nov,\n volume = {670},\n number = {1},\n pages = {105-115},\n doi = {10.1086/522220},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0708.1196},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...670..105O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{peterson2014,\n author = {{Peterson}, Bradley M.},\n title = \"{Measuring the Masses of Supermassive Black Holes}\",\n journal = {\\ssr},\n keywords = {Active galactic nuclei, Black hole, Reverberation mapping},\n year = 2014,\n month = sep,\n volume = {183},\n number = {1-4},\n pages = {253-275},\n doi = {10.1007/s11214-013-9987-4},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014SSRv..183..253P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{du2015,\n author = {{Du}, Pu and {Hu}, Chen and {Lu}, Kai-Xing and {Huang}, Ying-Ke and {Cheng}, Cheng and {Qiu}, Jie and {Li}, Yan-Rong and {Zhang}, Yang-Wei and {Fan}, Xu-Liang and {Bai}, Jin-Ming and {Bian}, Wei-Hao and {Yuan}, Ye-Fei and {Kaspi}, Shai and {Ho}, Luis C. and {Netzer}, Hagai and {Wang}, Jian-Min and {SEAMBH Collaboration}},\n title = \"{Supermassive Black Holes with High Accretion Rates in Active Galactic Nuclei. IV. H{\\ensuremath{\\beta}} Time Lags and Implications for Super-Eddington Accretion}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, black hole physics, galaxies: active, quasars: supermassive black holes, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2015,\n month = jun,\n volume = {806},\n number = {1},\n eid = {22},\n pages = {22},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/22},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1504.01844},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806...22D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{nikolajuk2006,\n author = {{Niko{\\l}ajuk}, M. and {Czerny}, B. and {Zi{\\'o}{\\l}kowski}, J. and {Gierli{\\'n}ski}, M.},\n title = \"{Consistency of the black hole mass determination in AGN from the reverberation and the X-ray excess variance method}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active: galaxies: Seyfert: X-rays: galaxies, galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, X-rays: galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = aug,\n volume = {370},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1534-1540},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10576.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0606621},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.370.1534N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{onken2004,\n author = {{Onken}, Christopher A. and {Ferrarese}, Laura and {Merritt}, David and {Peterson}, Bradley M. and {Pogge}, Richard W. and {Vestergaard}, Marianne and {Wandel}, Amri},\n title = \"{Supermassive Black Holes in Active Galactic Nuclei. II. Calibration of the Black Hole Mass-Velocity Dispersion Relationship for Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Black Hole Physics, Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Nuclei, Galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = nov,\n volume = {615},\n number = {2},\n pages = {645-651},\n doi = {10.1086/424655},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0407297},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...615..645O},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{Hutsemekers2024b,\n author = {{Hutsem{\\'e}kers}, Damien and {Sluse}, Dominique and {Savi{\\'c}}, {\\DJ}or{\\dj}e},\n title = \"{Size and kinematics of the low-ionization broad emission line region from microlensing-induced line profile distortions in gravitationally lensed quasars}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: micro, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = nov,\n volume = {691},\n eid = {A292},\n pages = {A292},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202452240},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2410.16018},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...691A.292H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Hutsemekers2024a,\n author = {{Hutsem{\\'e}kers}, Damien and {Sluse}, Dominique and {Savi{\\'c}}, {\\DJ}or{\\dj}e},\n title = \"{Size and kinematics of the C IV broad emission line region from microlensing-induced line profile distortions in two gravitationally lensed quasars}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: micro, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, quasars: individual: SDSS J133907.13+131039.6, quasars: individual: SDSS J113803.73+031457.7, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jul,\n volume = {687},\n eid = {A153},\n pages = {A153},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202450258},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2405.09476},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...687A.153H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Savic2024,\n author = {{Savi{\\'c}}, {\\DJ}. V. and {Hutsem{\\'e}kers}, D. and {Sluse}, D.},\n title = \"{Probing the broad line region geometry and size of the gravitationally lensed quasar Q2237+0305 with microlensing time series}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {gravitation, gravitational lensing: micro, galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, quasars: individual: Q2237+0305, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = jul,\n volume = {687},\n eid = {A114},\n pages = {A114},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202347953},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2405.09303},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...687A.114S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Hutsemekers2023,\n author = {{Hutsem{\\'e}kers}, Damien and {Sluse}, Dominique and {Savi{\\'c}}, {\\DJ}or{\\dj}e and {Richards}, Gordon T.},\n title = \"{Microlensing of the broad emission line region in the lensed quasar J1004+4112}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: micro, quasars: general, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = apr,\n volume = {672},\n eid = {A45},\n pages = {A45},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202245490},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2302.11930},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...672A..45H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Hutsemekers2021,\n author = {{Hutsem{\\'e}kers}, D. and {Sluse}, D.},\n title = \"{Geometry and kinematics of the broad emission line region in the lensed quasar Q2237+0305}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {quasars: general, quasars: emission lines, gravitational lensing: micro, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2021,\n month = oct,\n volume = {654},\n eid = {A155},\n pages = {A155},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202141820},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2108.08696},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...654A.155H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{pandey2023,\n author = {{Pandey}, Ashwani and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Panda}, Swayamtrupta and {Prince}, Raj and {Jaiswal}, Vikram Kumar and {Martinez-Aldama}, Mary Loli and {Zaja{\\v{c}}ek}, Michal and {{\\'S}niegowska}, Marzena},\n title = \"{Broad-line region in active galactic nuclei: Dusty or dustless?}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2023,\n month = dec,\n volume = {680},\n eid = {A102},\n pages = {A102},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202347819},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2310.05089},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...680A.102P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{moloney2014,\n author = {{Moloney}, Joshua and {Shull}, J. Michael},\n title = \"{Constraining UV Continuum Slopes of Active Galactic Nuclei with CLOUDY Models of Broad-line Region Extreme-ultraviolet Emission Lines}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, line: profiles, quasars: emission lines, ultraviolet: galaxies, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2014,\n month = oct,\n volume = {793},\n number = {2},\n eid = {100},\n pages = {100},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/100},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1408.4397},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...793..100M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{kriss2019,\n author = {{Kriss}, G.~A. and {De Rosa}, G. and {Ely}, J. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Kaastra}, J. and {Mehdipour}, M. and {Ferland}, G.~J. and {Dehghanian}, M. and {Mathur}, S. and {Edelson}, R. and {Korista}, K.~T. and {Arav}, N. and {Barth}, A.~J. and {Bentz}, M.~C. and {Brandt}, W.~N. and {Crenshaw}, D.~M. and {Dalla Bont{\\`a}}, E. and {Denney}, K.~D. and {Done}, C. and {Eracleous}, M. and {Fausnaugh}, M.~M. and {Gardner}, E. and {Goad}, M.~R. and {Grier}, C.~J. and {Horne}, Keith and {Kochanek}, C.~S. and {McHardy}, I.~M. and {Netzer}, H. and {Pancoast}, A. and {Pei}, L. and {Pogge}, R.~W. and {Proga}, D. and {Silva}, C. and {Tejos}, N. and {Vestergaard}, M. and {Adams}, S.~M. and {Anderson}, M.~D. and {Ar{\\'e}valo}, P. and {Beatty}, T.~G. and {Behar}, E. and {Bennert}, V.~N. and {Bianchi}, S. and {Bigley}, A. and {Bisogni}, S. and {Boissay-Malaquin}, R. and {Borman}, G.~A. and {Bottorff}, M.~C. and {Breeveld}, A.~A. and {Brotherton}, M. and {Brown}, J.~E. and {Brown}, J.~S. and {Cackett}, E.~M. and {Canalizo}, G. and {Cappi}, M. and {Carini}, M.~T. and {Clubb}, K.~I. and {Comerford}, J.~M. and {Coker}, C.~T. and {Corsini}, E.~M. and {Costantini}, E. and {Croft}, S. and {Croxall}, K.~V. and {Deason}, A.~J. and {De Lorenzo-C{\\'a}ceres}, A. and {De Marco}, B. and {Dietrich}, M. and {Di Gesu}, L. and {Ebrero}, J. and {Evans}, P.~A. and {Filippenko}, A.~V. and {Flatland}, K. and {Gates}, E.~L. and {Gehrels}, N. and {Geier}, S. and {Gelbord}, J.~M. and {Gonzalez}, L. and {Gorjian}, V. and {Grupe}, D. and {Gupta}, A. and {Hall}, P.~B. and {Henderson}, C.~B. and {Hicks}, S. and {Holmbeck}, E. and {Holoien}, T.~W. -S. and {Hutchison}, T.~A. and {Im}, M. and {Jensen}, J.~J. and {Johnson}, C.~A. and {Joner}, M.~D. and {Kaspi}, S. and {Kelly}, B.~C. and {Kelly}, P.~L. and {Kennea}, J.~A. and {Kim}, M. and {Kim}, S.~C. and {Kim}, S.~Y. and {King}, A. and {Klimanov}, S.~A. and {Krongold}, Y. and {Lau}, M.~W. and {Lee}, J.~C. and {Leonard}, D.~C. and {Li}, Miao and {Lira}, P. and {Lochhaas}, C. and {Ma}, Zhiyuan and {MacInnis}, F. and {Malkan}, M.~A. and {Manne-Nicholas}, E.~R. and {Matt}, G. and {Mauerhan}, J.~C. and {McGurk}, R. and {Montuori}, C. and {Morelli}, L. and {Mosquera}, A. and {Mudd}, D. and {M{\\\"u}ller-S{\\'a}nchez}, F. and {Nazarov}, S.~V. and {Norris}, R.~P. and {Nousek}, J.~A. and {Nguyen}, M.~L. and {Ochner}, P. and {Okhmat}, D.~N. and {Paltani}, S. and {Parks}, J.~R. and {Pinto}, C. and {Pizzella}, A. and {Poleski}, R. and {Ponti}, G. and {Pott}, J. -U. and {Rafter}, S.~E. and {Rix}, H. -W. and {Runnoe}, J. and {Saylor}, D.~A. and {Schimoia}, J.~S. and {Schn{\\\"u}lle}, K. and {Scott}, B. and {Sergeev}, S.~G. and {Shappee}, B.~J. and {Shivvers}, I. and {Siegel}, M. and {Simonian}, G.~V. and {Siviero}, A. and {Skielboe}, A. and {Somers}, G. and {Spencer}, M. and {Starkey}, D. and {Stevens}, D.~J. and {Sung}, H. -I. and {Tayar}, J. and {Teems}, K.~G. and {Treu}, T. and {Turner}, C.~S. and {Uttley}, P. and {. Van Saders}, J. and {Vican}, L. and {Villforth}, C. and {Villanueva}, Jr., S. and {Walton}, D.~J. and {Waters}, T. and {Weiss}, Y. and {Woo}, J. -H. and {Yan}, H. and {Yuk}, H. and {Zheng}, W. and {Zhu}, W. and {Zu}, Y.},\n title = \"{Space Telescope and Optical Reverberation Mapping Project. VIII. Time Variability of Emission and Absorption in NGC 5548 Based on Modeling the Ultraviolet Spectrum}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: individual: NGC 5548, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = aug,\n volume = {881},\n number = {2},\n eid = {153},\n pages = {153},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab3049},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1907.03874},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...881..153K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n@ARTICLE{gilbert2003,\n author = {{Gilbert}, Karoline M. and {Peterson}, Bradley M.},\n title = \"{An Intrinsic Baldwin Effect in the H{\\ensuremath{\\beta}} Broad Emission Line in the Spectrum of NGC 5548}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Individual: NGC Number: NGC 5548, Galaxies: Nuclei, Galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = apr,\n volume = {587},\n number = {1},\n pages = {123-127},\n doi = {10.1086/368112},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0212379},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...587..123G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{korista2004,\n author = {{Korista}, Kirk T. and {Goad}, Michael R.},\n title = \"{What the Optical Recombination Lines Can Tell Us about the Broad-Line Regions of Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Active, Galaxies: Nuclei, Galaxies: Seyfert, Line: Formation, Line: Profiles, Galaxies: Quasars: Emission Lines, Astrophysics},\n year = 2004,\n month = may,\n volume = {606},\n number = {2},\n pages = {749-762},\n doi = {10.1086/383193},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0402506},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...606..749K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{goad2014,\n author = {{Goad}, M.~R. and {Korista}, K.~T.},\n title = \"{Interpreting broad emission-line variations - I. Factors influencing the emission-line response}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {line: profiles, methods: numerical, galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, quasars: emission lines, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2014,\n month = oct,\n volume = {444},\n number = {1},\n pages = {43-61},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stu1456},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1407.5004},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.444...43G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{goad2015,\n author = {{Goad}, M.~R. and {Korista}, K.~T.},\n title = \"{Interpreting broad emission-line variations - II. Tensions between luminosity, characteristic size, and responsivity}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {methods: numerical, galaxies: active, quasars: emission lines, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2015,\n month = nov,\n volume = {453},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3662-3684},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stv1861},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1508.02528},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453.3662G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{netzer2010,\n author = {{Netzer}, Hagai and {Marziani}, Paola},\n title = \"{The Effect of Radiation Pressure on Emission-line Profiles and Black Hole Mass Determination in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = nov,\n volume = {724},\n number = {1},\n pages = {318-328},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/318},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1006.3553},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...724..318N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{czerny2019,\n author = {{Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Olejak}, Aleksandra and {Ra{\\l}owski}, Mateusz and {Koz{\\l}owski}, Szymon and {Martinez Aldama}, Mary Loli and {Zajacek}, Michal and {Pych}, Wojtek and {Hryniewicz}, Krzysztof and {Pietrzy{\\'n}ski}, Grzegorz and {Sobrino Figaredo}, Catalina and {Haas}, Martin and {{\\'S}redzi{\\'n}ska}, Justyna and {Krupa}, Magdalena and {Kurcz}, Agnieszka and {Udalski}, Andrzej and {Gorski}, Marek and {Karas}, Vladimir and {Panda}, Swayamtrupta and {Sniegowska}, Marzena and {Naddaf}, Mohammad-Hassan and {Bilicki}, Maciej and {Sarna}, Marek},\n title = \"{Time Delay Measurement of Mg II Line in CTS C30.10 with SALT}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, galaxies: Seyfert, quasars: emission lines, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = jul,\n volume = {880},\n number = {1},\n eid = {46},\n pages = {46},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab2913},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1901.09757},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...880...46C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{aitken2000,\n author = {{Aitken}, D.~K. and {Greaves}, J. and {Chrysostomou}, Antonio and {Jenness}, T. and {Holland}, W. and {Hough}, J.~H. and {Pierce-Price}, D. and {Richer}, J.},\n title = \"{Detection of Polarized Millimeter and Submillimeter Emission from Sagittarius A*}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {GALAXIES: INDIVIDUAL (SAGITTARIUS A*), GALAXY: CENTER, POLARIZATION},\n year = 2000,\n month = may,\n volume = {534},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L173-L176},\n doi = {10.1086/312685},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...534L.173A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{bower2003,\n author = {{Bower}, Geoffrey C. and {Wright}, Melvyn C.~H. and {Falcke}, Heino and {Backer}, Donald C.},\n title = \"{Interferometric Detection of Linear Polarization from Sagittarius A* at 230 GHz}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Galaxies: Active, Galaxy: Center, Polarization, Radiation Mechanisms: Nonthermal, Scattering, Astrophysics},\n year = 2003,\n month = may,\n volume = {588},\n number = {1},\n pages = {331-337},\n doi = {10.1086/373989},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0302227},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...588..331B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{marrone2007,\n author = {{Marrone}, Daniel P. and {Moran}, James M. and {Zhao}, Jun-Hui and {Rao}, Ramprasad},\n title = \"{An Unambiguous Detection of Faraday Rotation in Sagittarius A*}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Black Hole Physics, Galaxy: Center, Polarization, Submillimeter, Techniques: Interferometric, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = jan,\n volume = {654},\n number = {1},\n pages = {L57-L60},\n doi = {10.1086/510850},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0611791},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...654L..57M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{yoon2020,\n author = {{Yoon}, D. and {Chatterjee}, K. and {Markoff}, S.~B. and {van Eijnatten}, D. and {Younsi}, Z. and {Liska}, M. and {Tchekhovskoy}, A.},\n title = \"{Spectral and imaging properties of Sgr A* from high-resolution 3D GRMHD simulations with radiative cooling}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, black hole physics, MHD, methods: numerical, stars: jets, galaxies: individual: (SgrA*), Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2020,\n month = dec,\n volume = {499},\n number = {3},\n pages = {3178-3192},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/staa3031},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2009.14227},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.3178Y},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{rosborough2024,\n author = {{Rosborough}, Sara A. and {Robinson}, Andrew and {Almeyda}, Triana and {Noll}, Madison},\n title = \"{Modeling the Reverberation Response of the Broad-line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Reverberation mapping, Astronomy data modeling, Supermassive black holes, Active galactic nuclei, 2019, 1859, 1663, 16, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = apr,\n volume = {965},\n number = {1},\n eid = {35},\n pages = {35},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad26f3},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2311.03590},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...965...35R},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{woo2024,\n author = {{Woo}, Jong-Hak and {Wang}, Shu and {Rakshit}, Suvendu and {Cho}, Hojin and {Son}, Donghoon and {Bennert}, Vardha N. and {Gallo}, Elena and {Hodges-Kluck}, Edmund and {Treu}, Tommaso and {Barth}, Aaron J. and {Cho}, Wanjin and {Foord}, Adi and {Geum}, Jaehyuk and {Guo}, Hengxiao and {Jadhav}, Yashashree and {Jeon}, Yiseul and {Kabasares}, Kyle M. and {Kang}, Won-Suk and {Kim}, Changseok and {Kim}, Minjin and {Kim}, Tae-Woo and {Le}, Huynh Anh N. and {Malkan}, Matthew A. and {Mandal}, Amit Kumar and {Park}, Daeseong and {Spencer}, Chance and {Shin}, Jaejin and {Sung}, Hyun-il and {U}, Vivian and {Williams}, Peter R. and {Yee}, Nick},\n title = \"{The Seoul National University AGN Monitoring Project. III. H{\\ensuremath{\\beta}} Lag Measurements of 32 Luminous Active Galactic Nuclei and the High-luminosity End of the Size{\\textendash}Luminosity Relation}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active galactic nuclei, Black holes, Reverberation mapping, 16, 162, 2019, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = feb,\n volume = {962},\n number = {1},\n eid = {67},\n pages = {67},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ad132f},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2311.15518},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...962...67W},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{panda_marzena2024,\n author = {{Panda}, Swayamtrupta and {{\\'S}niegowska}, Marzena},\n title = \"{Changing-look Active Galactic Nuclei. I. Tracking the Transition on the Main Sequence of Quasars}\",\n journal = {\\apjs},\n keywords = {Quasars, Active galactic nuclei, Spectroscopy, Catalogs, Supermassive black holes, 1319, 16, 1558, 205, 1663, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = may,\n volume = {272},\n number = {1},\n eid = {13},\n pages = {13},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4365/ad344f},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2206.10056},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJS..272...13P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{du_wang2019,\n author = {{Du}, Pu and {Wang}, Jian-Min},\n title = \"{The Radius-Luminosity Relationship Depends on Optical Spectra in Active Galactic Nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Active galactic nuclei, Active galaxies, Reverberation mapping, Supermassive black holes, Quasars, 16, 17, 2019, 1663, 1319, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2019,\n month = nov,\n volume = {886},\n number = {1},\n eid = {42},\n pages = {42},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab4908},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1909.06735},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886...42D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{naddaf2024Univ,\n author = {{Naddaf}, Mohammad Hassan},\n title = \"{The Effect of Outflow Launching Radial Efficiency of Accretion Disk on the Shape of Emission-Line Profiles}\",\n journal = {Universe},\n keywords = {broad line region, outflow rate, active galaxies, radiation pressure, emission-line profiles, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2024,\n month = dec,\n volume = {11},\n number = {1},\n eid = {8},\n pages = {8},\n doi = {10.3390/universe11010008},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2412.18772},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Univ...11....8N},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{zheng2011,\n author = {{Zheng}, Sheng-Ming and {Yuan}, Feng and {Gu}, Wei-Min and {Lu}, Ju-Fu},\n title = \"{Revisiting the Thermal Stability of Radiation-dominated Thin Disks}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, black hole physics, instabilities, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2011,\n month = may,\n volume = {732},\n number = {1},\n eid = {52},\n pages = {52},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/732/1/52},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1103.0347},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...732...52Z},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{abramowicz1988,\n author = {{Abramowicz}, M.~A. and {Czerny}, B. and {Lasota}, J.~P. and {Szuszkiewicz}, E.},\n title = \"{Slim Accretion Disks}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Accretion Disks, Astronomical Models, Black Holes (Astronomy), Stellar Mass Accretion, Computational Astrophysics, Eddington Approximation, Navier-Stokes Equation, Roche Limit, Astrophysics, BLACK HOLES, STARS: ACCRETION},\n year = 1988,\n month = sep,\n volume = {332},\n pages = {646},\n doi = {10.1086/166683},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...332..646A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@article{fabian2017,\n title={Future of X‐ray reverberation from <scp>AGN</scp>},\n volume={338},\n ISSN={1521-3994},\n DOI={10.1002/asna.201713341},\n number={2–3},\n journal={Astronomische Nachrichten},\n publisher={Wiley},\n author={Fabian, A. C. and Alston, W. N. and Cackett, E. M. and Kara, E. and Uttley, P. and Wilkins, D. R.},\n year={2017},\n month=mar, pages={269–273} }\n\n@article{abramowicz1995,\n title={Thermal equilibria of accretion disks},\n volume={438},\n ISSN={1538-4357},\n DOI={10.1086/187709},\n journal={The Astrophysical Journal},\n publisher={American Astronomical Society},\n author={Abramowicz, Marek A. and Chen, Xingming and Kato, Shoji and Lasota, Jean-Pierre and Regev, Oded},\n year={1995},\n month=jan, pages={L37} }\n\n@ARTICLE{Ghanbarnejad2025,\n author = {{Ghanbarnejad}, Hanifeh and {Ghasemnezhad}, Maryam},\n title = \"{Magnetized Protoplanetary Disks around Young Stars in the Presence of Realistic Cooling}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Protoplanetary disks, Protostars, Magnetic fields, 1300, 1302, 994},\n year = 2025,\n month = feb,\n volume = {980},\n number = {2},\n eid = {166},\n pages = {166},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ada93f},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...980..166G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{habibi2019,\n author = {{Habibi}, Asiyeh and {Abbassi}, Shahram},\n title = \"{Thermal Instability of Thin Accretion Disks in the Presence of Wind and a Toroidal Magnetic Field}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {Stellar accretion disks, Magnetic fields, Stellar winds, 1579, 994, 1636, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2019,\n month = dec,\n volume = {887},\n number = {2},\n eid = {256},\n pages = {256},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/ab5793},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1911.06645},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...887..256H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Poutanen2007,\n author = {{Poutanen}, Juri and {Lipunova}, Galina and {Fabrika}, Sergei and {Butkevich}, Alexey G. and {Abolmasov}, Pavel},\n title = \"{Supercritically accreting stellar mass black holes as ultraluminous X-ray sources}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, black hole physics, X-rays: binaries, X-rays: galaxies, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = may,\n volume = {377},\n number = {3},\n pages = {1187-1194},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11668.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0609274},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.377.1187P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Chen1995,\n author = {{Chen}, Xingming and {Abramowicz}, Marek A. and {Lasota}, Jean-Pierre and {Narayan}, Ramesh and {Yi}, Insu},\n title = \"{Unified Description of Accretion Flows around Black Holes}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {Accretion Disks, Advection, Black Holes (Astronomy), Optical Thickness, Radiative Transfer, Stellar Mass Accretion, Thermodynamic Equilibrium, Eddington Approximation, Steady State, Topology, Variability, Astrophysics, ACCRETION, ACCRETION DISKS, INSTABILITIES, Astrophysics},\n year = 1995,\n month = apr,\n volume = {443},\n pages = {L61},\n doi = {10.1086/187836},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9502015},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...443L..61C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Laor2014,\n author = {{Laor}, Ari and {Davis}, Shane W.},\n title = \"{Line-driven winds and the UV turnover in AGN accretion discs}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, black hole physics, galaxies: active, quasars: general, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2014,\n month = mar,\n volume = {438},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3024-3038},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt2408},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1312.3556},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438.3024L},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Morgan2010,\n author = {{Morgan}, Christopher W. and {Kochanek}, C.~S. and {Morgan}, Nicholas D. and {Falco}, Emilio E.},\n title = \"{The Quasar Accretion Disk Size-Black Hole Mass Relation}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, dark matter, gravitational lensing: micro, gravitational lensing: strong, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = apr,\n volume = {712},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1129-1136},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/1129},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1002.4160},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...712.1129M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Dexter2011,\n author = {{Dexter}, Jason and {Agol}, Eric},\n title = \"{Quasar Accretion Disks are Strongly Inhomogeneous}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, black hole physics, galaxies: active, gravitational lensing: micro, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2011,\n month = jan,\n volume = {727},\n number = {1},\n eid = {L24},\n pages = {L24},\n doi = {10.1088/2041-8205/727/1/L24},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1012.3169},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...727L..24D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Edelson2015,\n author = {{Edelson}, R. and {Gelbord}, J.~M. and {Horne}, K. and {McHardy}, I.~M. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Ar{\\'e}valo}, P. and {Breeveld}, A.~A. and {De Rosa}, G. and {Evans}, P.~A. and {Goad}, M.~R. and {Kriss}, G.~A. and {Brandt}, W.~N. and {Gehrels}, N. and {Grupe}, D. and {Kennea}, J.~A. and {Kochanek}, C.~S. and {Nousek}, J.~A. and {Papadakis}, I. and {Siegel}, M. and {Starkey}, D. and {Uttley}, P. and {Vaughan}, S. and {Young}, S. and {Barth}, A.~J. and {Bentz}, M.~C. and {Brewer}, B.~J. and {Crenshaw}, D.~M. and {Dalla Bont{\\`a}}, E. and {De Lorenzo-C{\\'a}ceres}, A. and {Denney}, K.~D. and {Dietrich}, M. and {Ely}, J. and {Fausnaugh}, M.~M. and {Grier}, C.~J. and {Hall}, P.~B. and {Kaastra}, J. and {Kelly}, B.~C. and {Korista}, K.~T. and {Lira}, P. and {Mathur}, S. and {Netzer}, H. and {Pancoast}, A. and {Pei}, L. and {Pogge}, R.~W. and {Schimoia}, J.~S. and {Treu}, T. and {Vestergaard}, M. and {Villforth}, C. and {Yan}, H. and {Zu}, Y.},\n title = \"{Space Telescope and Optical Reverberation Mapping Project. II. Swift and HST Reverberation Mapping of the Accretion Disk of NGC 5548}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: individual: NGC 5548, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2015,\n month = jun,\n volume = {806},\n number = {1},\n eid = {129},\n pages = {129},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/129},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1501.05951},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806..129E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Edelson2019,\n author = {{Edelson}, R. and {Gelbord}, J. and {Cackett}, E. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Horne}, K. and {Barth}, A.~J. and {Starkey}, D.~A. and {Bentz}, M. and {Brandt}, W.~N. and {Goad}, M. and {Joner}, M. and {Korista}, K. and {Netzer}, H. and {Page}, K. and {Uttley}, P. and {Vaughan}, S. and {Breeveld}, A. and {Cenko}, S.~B. and {Done}, C. and {Evans}, P. and {Fausnaugh}, M. and {Ferland}, G. and {Gonzalez-Buitrago}, D. and {Gropp}, J. and {Grupe}, D. and {Kaastra}, J. and {Kennea}, J. and {Kriss}, G. and {Mathur}, S. and {Mehdipour}, M. and {Mudd}, D. and {Nousek}, J. and {Schmidt}, T. and {Vestergaard}, M. and {Villforth}, C.},\n title = \"{The First Swift Intensive AGN Accretion Disk Reverberation Mapping Survey}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2019,\n month = jan,\n volume = {870},\n number = {2},\n eid = {123},\n pages = {123},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3b4},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1811.07956},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...870..123E},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Fausnaugh2016,\n author = {{Fausnaugh}, M.~M. and {Denney}, K.~D. and {Barth}, A.~J. and {Bentz}, M.~C. and {Bottorff}, M.~C. and {Carini}, M.~T. and {Croxall}, K.~V. and {De Rosa}, G. and {Goad}, M.~R. and {Horne}, Keith and {Joner}, M.~D. and {Kaspi}, S. and {Kim}, M. and {Klimanov}, S.~A. and {Kochanek}, C.~S. and {Leonard}, D.~C. and {Netzer}, H. and {Peterson}, B.~M. and {Schn{\\\"u}lle}, K. and {Sergeev}, S.~G. and {Vestergaard}, M. and {Zheng}, W.-K. and {Zu}, Y. and {Anderson}, M.~D. and {Ar{\\'e}valo}, P. and {Bazhaw}, C. and {Borman}, G.~A. and {Boroson}, T.~A. and {Brandt}, W.~N. and {Breeveld}, A.~A. and {Brewer}, B.~J. and {Cackett}, E.~M. and {Crenshaw}, D.~M. and {Dalla Bont{\\`a}}, E. and {De Lorenzo-C{\\'a}ceres}, A. and {Dietrich}, M. and {Edelson}, R. and {Efimova}, N.~V. and {Ely}, J. and {Evans}, P.~A. and {Filippenko}, A.~V. and {Flatland}, K. and {Gehrels}, N. and {Geier}, S. and {Gelbord}, J.~M. and {Gonzalez}, L. and {Gorjian}, V. and {Grier}, C.~J. and {Grupe}, D. and {Hall}, P.~B. and {Hicks}, S. and {Horenstein}, D. and {Hutchison}, T. and {Im}, M. and {Jensen}, J.~J. and {Jones}, J. and {Kaastra}, J. and {Kelly}, B.~C. and {Kennea}, J.~A. and {Kim}, S.~C. and {Korista}, K.~T. and {Kriss}, G.~A. and {Lee}, J.~C. and {Lira}, P. and {MacInnis}, F. and {Manne-Nicholas}, E.~R. and {Mathur}, S. and {McHardy}, I.~M. and {Montouri}, C. and {Musso}, R. and {Nazarov}, S.~V. and {Norris}, R.~P. and {Nousek}, J.~A. and {Okhmat}, D.~N. and {Pancoast}, A. and {Papadakis}, I. and {Parks}, J.~R. and {Pei}, L. and {Pogge}, R.~W. and {Pott}, J.-U. and {Rafter}, S.~E. and {Rix}, H.-W. and {Saylor}, D.~A. and {Schimoia}, J.~S. and {Siegel}, M. and {Spencer}, M. and {Starkey}, D. and {Sung}, H.-I. and {Teems}, K.~G. and {Treu}, T. and {Turner}, C.~S. and {Uttley}, P. and {Villforth}, C. and {Weiss}, Y. and {Woo}, J.-H. and {Yan}, H. and {Young}, S.},\n title = \"{Space Telescope and Optical Reverberation Mapping Project. III. Optical Continuum Emission and Broadband Time Delays in NGC 5548}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: individual: NGC 5548, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2016,\n month = apr,\n volume = {821},\n number = {1},\n eid = {56},\n pages = {56},\n doi = {10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/56},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1510.05648},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821...56F},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Cackett2018,\n author = {{Cackett}, Edward M. and {Chiang}, Chia-Ying and {McHardy}, Ian and {Edelson}, Rick and {Goad}, Michael R. and {Horne}, Keith and {Korista}, Kirk T.},\n title = \"{Accretion Disk Reverberation with Hubble Space Telescope Observations of NGC 4593: Evidence for Diffuse Continuum Lags}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: individual: NGC 4593, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2018,\n month = apr,\n volume = {857},\n number = {1},\n eid = {53},\n pages = {53},\n doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aab4f7},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1712.04025},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...857...53C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{McHardy2006,\n author = {{McHardy}, I.~M. and {Koerding}, E. and {Knigge}, C. and {Uttley}, P. and {Fender}, R.~P.},\n title = \"{Active galactic nuclei as scaled-up Galactic black holes}\",\n journal = {\\nat},\n keywords = {Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = dec,\n volume = {444},\n number = {7120},\n pages = {730-732},\n doi = {10.1038/nature05389},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0612273},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006Natur.444..730M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Kelly2009,\n author = {{Kelly}, Brandon C. and {Bechtold}, Jill and {Siemiginowska}, Aneta},\n title = \"{Are the Variations in Quasar Optical Flux Driven by Thermal Fluctuations?}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, galaxies: active, methods: data analysis, quasars: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2009,\n month = jun,\n volume = {698},\n number = {1},\n pages = {895-910},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/895},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0903.5315},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...698..895K},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Arevalo2006,\n author = {{Ar{\\'e}valo}, P. and {Uttley}, P.},\n title = \"{Investigating a fluctuating-accretion model for the spectral-timing properties of accreting black hole systems}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, galaxies: active, Astrophysics},\n year = 2006,\n month = apr,\n volume = {367},\n number = {2},\n pages = {801-814},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.09989.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/0512394},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.367..801A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@misc{Leung2026,\n title={Discovery of Quasar Variability and Early Accretion Disk Signatures at Cosmic Dawn}, \n author={Gene C. K. Leung and Anna-Christina Eilers and Christos Panagiotou and Julien Wolf and Kishalay De and Luke Weisenbach and Minghao Yue and Xiaohui Fan and Yuzo Ishikawa and Erin Kara and Mirko Krumpe and Andrea Merloni and Robert A. Simcoe and Feige Wang and Jinyi Yang},\n year={2026},\n eprint={2605.00978},\n archivePrefix={arXiv},\n primaryClass={astro-ph.GA},\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Hutsemekers2025,\n author = {{Hutsem{\\'e}kers}, Damien and {Sluse}, Dominique},\n title = \"{Evidence of a diffuse, extended continuum source in quasars from the relative sizes of the broad line region and the UV-optical continuum source measured with microlensing}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {gravitational lensing: micro, quasars: emission lines, quasars: general, quasars: supermassive black holes, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2025,\n month = mar,\n volume = {695},\n eid = {A10},\n pages = {A10},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202453457},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2502.08313},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...695A..10H},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{czerny2019Univ,\n author = {{Czerny}, Bozena},\n title = \"{Slim Accretion Disks: Theory and Observational Consequences}\",\n journal = {Universe},\n keywords = {black hole, accretion disks, slim disks, accretion disk stability, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2019,\n month = may,\n volume = {5},\n number = {5},\n eid = {131},\n pages = {131},\n doi = {10.3390/universe5050131},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1905.00120},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Univ....5..131C},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Belloni1997,\n author = {{Belloni}, T. and {M{\\'e}ndez}, M. and {King}, A.~R. and {van der Klis}, M. and {van Paradijs}, J.},\n title = \"{An Unstable Central Disk in the Superluminal Black Hole X-Ray Binary GRS 1915+105}\",\n journal = {\\apjl},\n keywords = {ACCRETION, ACCRETION DISKS, STARS: BINARIES: CLOSE, BLACK HOLE PHYSICS, INSTABILITIES, X-RAYS: STARS, STARS: INDIVIDUAL ALPHANUMERIC: GRS 1915+105, Accretion, Accretion Disks, Stars: Binaries: Close, Black Hole Physics --Instabilities, Stars: Individual: Alphanumeric: GRS 1915+105, X-Rays: Stars, Astrophysics},\n year = 1997,\n month = apr,\n volume = {479},\n number = {2},\n pages = {L145-L148},\n doi = {10.1086/310595},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {astro-ph/9702048},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...479L.145B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Janiuk2011,\n author = {{Janiuk}, Agnieszka and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena},\n title = \"{On different types of instabilities in black hole accretion discs: implications for X-ray binaries and active galactic nuclei}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {galaxies: active, galaxies: evolution, X-rays: binaries, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2011,\n month = jul,\n volume = {414},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2186-2194},\n doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18544.x},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1102.3257},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.414.2186J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Sniegowska2023,\n author = {{{\\'S}niegowska}, Marzena and {Grz{\\c{e}}dzielski}, Miko{\\l}aj and {Czerny}, Bo{\\.z}ena and {Janiuk}, Agnieszka},\n title = \"{Modified models of radiation pressure instability applied to 10, {}10$^{5}$, and {}10$^{7}$ M$_{☉}$ accreting black holes}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion disks, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = apr,\n volume = {672},\n eid = {A19},\n pages = {A19},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202243828},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2204.10067},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...672A..19S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Done2007,\n author = {{Done}, Chris and {Gierli{\\'n}ski}, Marek and {Kubota}, Aya},\n title = \"{Modelling the behaviour of accretion flows in X-ray binaries. Everything you always wanted to know about accretion but were afraid to ask}\",\n journal = {\\aapr},\n keywords = {Accretion, accretion discs, Black hole physics, X-rays: binaries, Astrophysics},\n year = 2007,\n month = dec,\n volume = {15},\n number = {1},\n pages = {1-66},\n doi = {10.1007/s00159-007-0006-1},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {0708.0148},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&ARv..15....1D},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{MacLeod2010,\n author = {{MacLeod}, C.~L. and {Ivezi{\\'c}}, {\\v{Z}}. and {Kochanek}, C.~S. and {Koz{\\l}owski}, S. and {Kelly}, B. and {Bullock}, E. and {Kimball}, A. and {Sesar}, B. and {Westman}, D. and {Brooks}, K. and {Gibson}, R. and {Becker}, A.~C. and {de Vries}, W.~H.},\n title = \"{Modeling the Time Variability of SDSS Stripe 82 Quasars as a Damped Random Walk}\",\n journal = {\\apj},\n keywords = {quasars: general, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics},\n year = 2010,\n month = oct,\n volume = {721},\n number = {2},\n pages = {1014-1033},\n doi = {10.1088/0004-637X/721/2/1014},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1004.0276},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.CO},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...721.1014M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Burke2021,\n author = {{Burke}, Colin J. and {Shen}, Yue and {Blaes}, Omer and {Gammie}, Charles F. and {Horne}, Keith and {Jiang}, Yan-Fei and {Liu}, Xin and {McHardy}, Ian M. and {Morgan}, Christopher W. and {Scaringi}, Simone and {Yang}, Qian},\n title = \"{A characteristic optical variability time scale in astrophysical accretion disks}\",\n journal = {Science},\n keywords = {ASTRONOMY, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2021,\n month = aug,\n volume = {373},\n number = {6556},\n pages = {789-792},\n doi = {10.1126/science.abg9933},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2108.05389},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Sci...373..789B},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Giustini2023,\n author = {{Giustini}, M. and {Rodr{\\'\\i}guez Hidalgo}, P. and {Reeves}, J.~N. and {Matzeu}, G. and {Braito}, V. and {Eracleous}, M. and {Chartas}, G. and {Schartel}, N. and {Vignali}, C. and {Hall}, P.~B. and {Waters}, T. and {Ponti}, G. and {Proga}, D. and {Dadina}, M. and {Cappi}, M. and {Miniutti}, G. and {de Vries}, L.},\n title = \"{Coordinated X-ray and UV absorption within the accretion disk wind of the active galactic nucleus PG 1126-041}\",\n journal = {\\aap},\n keywords = {techniques: spectroscopic, methods: observational, galaxies: active, galaxies: individual: PG 1126-041, X-rays: galaxies, quasars: supermassive black holes, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = nov,\n volume = {679},\n eid = {A73},\n pages = {A73},\n doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202244270},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2306.05469},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...679A..73G},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Jha2022,\n author = {{Jha}, Vivek Kumar and {Joshi}, Ravi and {Chand}, Hum and {Wu}, Xue-Bing and {Ho}, Luis C. and {Rastogi}, Shantanu and {Ma}, Qinchun},\n title = \"{Accretion disc sizes from continuum reverberation mapping of AGN selected from the ZTF survey}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert, quasars: supermassive black holes, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = apr,\n volume = {511},\n number = {2},\n pages = {3005-3016},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac109},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2109.05036},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.511.3005J},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Arevalo2023,\n author = {{Ar{\\'e}valo}, P. and {Lira}, P. and {S{\\'a}nchez-S{\\'a}ez}, P. and {Patel}, P. and {L{\\'o}pez-Navas}, E. and {Churazov}, E. and {Hern{\\'a}ndez-Garc{\\'\\i}a}, L.},\n title = \"{Optical variability in quasars: scalings with black hole mass and Eddington ratio depend on the observed time-scales}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, galaxies: active, quasars: general, quasars: supermassive black holes, galaxies: Seyfert, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2023,\n month = dec,\n volume = {526},\n number = {4},\n pages = {6078-6087},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stad3186},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2304.14228},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526.6078A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Stone2022,\n author = {{Stone}, Zachary and {Shen}, Yue and {Burke}, Colin J. and {Chen}, Yu-Ching and {Yang}, Qian and {Liu}, Xin and {Gruendl}, R.~A. and {Adam{\\'o}w}, M. and {Andrade-Oliveira}, F. and {Annis}, J. and {Bacon}, D. and {Bertin}, E. and {Bocquet}, S. and {Brooks}, D. and {Burke}, D.~L. and {Carnero Rosell}, A. and {Carrasco Kind}, M. and {Carretero}, J. and {da Costa}, L.~N. and {Pereira}, M.~E.~S. and {De Vicente}, J. and {Desai}, S. and {Diehl}, H.~T. and {Doel}, P. and {Ferrero}, I. and {Friedel}, D.~N. and {Frieman}, J. and {Garc{\\'\\i}a-Bellido}, J. and {Gaztanaga}, E. and {Gruen}, D. and {Gutierrez}, G. and {Hinton}, S.~R. and {Hollowood}, D.~L. and {Honscheid}, K. and {James}, D.~J. and {Kuehn}, K. and {Kuropatkin}, N. and {Lidman}, C. and {Maia}, M.~A.~G. and {Menanteau}, F. and {Miquel}, R. and {Morgan}, R. and {Paz-Chinch{\\'o}n}, F. and {Pieres}, A. and {Plazas Malag{\\'o}n}, A.~A. and {Rodriguez-Monroy}, M. and {Sanchez}, E. and {Scarpine}, V. and {Serrano}, S. and {Sevilla-Noarbe}, I. and {Smith}, M. and {Suchyta}, E. and {Swanson}, M.~E.~C. and {Tarl{\\'e}}, G. and {To}, C. and {DES Collaboration}},\n title = \"{Optical variability of quasars with 20-yr photometric light curves}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {surveys, quasars: general, quasars: supermassive black holes, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies},\n year = 2022,\n month = jul,\n volume = {514},\n number = {1},\n pages = {164-184},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stac1259},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2201.02762},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.GA},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514..164S},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Mosallanezhad2014,\n author = {{Mosallanezhad}, A. and {Abbassi}, S. and {Beiranvand}, N.},\n title = \"{Structure of advection-dominated accretion discs with outflows: the role of toroidal magnetic fields}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, black hole physics, MHD, stars: winds, outflows, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2014,\n month = feb,\n volume = {437},\n number = {4},\n pages = {3112-3123},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/stt2048},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1310.6318},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.437.3112M},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Penna2013,\n author = {{Penna}, Robert F. and {S{\\k{a}}dowski}, Aleksander and {Kulkarni}, Akshay K. and {Narayan}, Ramesh},\n title = \"{The Shakura-Sunyaev viscosity prescription with variable {\\ensuremath{\\alpha}} (r)}\",\n journal = {\\mnras},\n keywords = {accretion, accretion discs, black hole physics, gravitation, hydrodynamics, MHD, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2013,\n month = jan,\n volume = {428},\n number = {3},\n pages = {2255-2274},\n doi = {10.1093/mnras/sts185},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {1211.0526},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.428.2255P},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n@ARTICLE{Abramowicz2026,\n author = {{Abramowicz}, Marek A. and {Brandenburg}, Axel and {Hor{\\'a}k}, Ji{\\v{r}}{\\'\\i} and {Lan{\\v{c}}ov{\\'a}}, Debora and {Miller}, John C. and {Szuszkiewicz}, Ewa and {Wielgus}, Maciek},\n title = \"{Universal behaviour of $α$-viscosity in black hole accretion discs}\",\n journal = {arXiv e-prints},\n keywords = {High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena},\n year = 2026,\n month = mar,\n eid = {arXiv:2603.10997},\n pages = {arXiv:2603.10997},\n doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2603.10997},\narchivePrefix = {arXiv},\n eprint = {2603.10997},\n primaryClass = {astro-ph.HE},\n adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260310997A},\n adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}\n}\n\n\n\n================================================\nFILE: naddaf_AAL.tex\n================================================\n% aa.dem\n% AA vers. 9.1, LaTeX class for Astronomy & Astrophysics\n% demonstration file\n% (c) EDP Sciences\n%-----------------------------------------------------------------------\n%\n%\\documentclass[referee]{aa} % for a referee version\n%\\documentclass[onecolumn]{aa} % for a paper on 1 column \n%\\documentclass[longauth]{aa} % for the long lists of affiliations \n%\\documentclass[letter]{aa} % for the letters \n%\\documentclass[bibyear]{aa} % if the references are not structured \n% according to the author-year natbib style\n\n%\n\\documentclass[letter]{aa}\n\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{natbib}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\\usepackage{mathrsfs}\n\\usepackage{xcolor}\n\\usepackage{txfonts}\n\\usepackage[colorlinks=true]{hyperref}\n\\hypersetup{linkcolor=blue,citecolor=blue,filecolor=blue,urlcolor=blue}\n\\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}\n\n\\newcommand{\\naddaf}[1]{\\textcolor{magenta}{#1}}\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\begin{document} \n\n\\title{Radiation-pressure instability is an artifact of constant-$\\alpha$ closure}\n\\subtitle{Implications for AGN disk tensions}\n\n\\titlerunning{stable disk $\\alpha$-prescription}\n\n\\author{M. H. Naddaf \\inst{1}\n\\and M. Ghasemnezhad \\inst{2}\n\\and H. Ghanbarnejad \\inst{2}\n\\and D. Hutsem\\'ekers \\inst{1}\n\\and B. Czerny \\inst{3}}\n\n\\institute{\nInstitut d'Astrophysique et de Géophysique, Université de Liège, Allée du six août 19c, B-4000 Liège (Sart-Tilman), Belgium \\and\nDepartment of Interdisciplinary Physics and Technology, Faculty of Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran \\and\nCenter for Theoretical Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Al. Lotnik\\'ow 32/46, 02-668 Warsaw, Poland}\n \n%\\date{Submitted: 2026}\n \n\\abstract\n% context heading (optional)\n{}\n% aims heading (mandatory)\n{The standard $\\alpha$-disk formalism parametrizes turbulent angular momentum transport through a dimensionless coefficient $\\alpha$, assumed to be spatially and thermodynamically invariant. While analytically convenient, this assumption leads to the well-known thermal and viscous instabilities in radiation-pressure dominated (RPD) regions. We show that this instability is not the consequence of radiation pressure, but is due to enforcing a constant $\\alpha$ across distinct thermodynamic regimes.}\n% methods heading (mandatory)\n{Requiring the steady thin-disk (TD) to remain thermally stable and single-valued in the $\\dot{M}$--$\\Sigma$ plane yields a necessary condition on the stress response, expressed as $\\eta_{\\rm x} \\equiv d\\ln\\alpha_{\\rm x}\\,/\\,d\\ln X > 4/7$, where $X \\equiv P_{\\rm gas}/P_{\\rm rad}$. The resulting viscosity law $\\alpha_{\\rm x} \\equiv \\alpha(X)$ emerges directly from the internal consistency of TD equations, without modifying the stress law or invoking any additional physics.}\n% results heading (mandatory)\n{$\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ removes the RPD unstable branch. The disk structure becomes smooth and globally single-valued, with higher $\\Sigma$ and $\\tau$ in the inner RPD disk, while preserving the standard effective-temperature profile. This increases thermal and inflow timescales, offering a natural route to accretion-state dependent variability without large-amplitude radiation-pressure limit cycles. It also motivates revisiting AGN disk tensions, including microlensing sizes and continuum reverberation lags with improved radiative-transfer modeling. The results show that the RPD instability, and possibly some associated AGN disk tensions, reflect an inconsistent viscosity closure.}\n% conclusions heading (optional)\n{}\n\n\\keywords{accretion, accretion disks -- instabilities -- black hole physics -- radiation mechanisms: general -- methods: analytical}\n\n\\maketitle\n\\nolinenumbers\n\n%------------------------------------------------------\n\\section{Introduction}\\label{intro}\n\nThe standard TD model of \\citet{SS1973} remains the canonical framework for describing radiatively efficient accretion onto compact objects and underlies much of the standard interpretation of active galactic nuclei and black hole growth \\citep{netzer2013}. Its central simplification is the replacement of the unknown transport physics by a local closure, in which the turbulent stress is set as a fraction of the local pressure via the dimensionless parameter $\\alpha$. This prescription yields the familiar analytic structure equations and has underpinned much of modern accretion theory. Yet, it leaves unresolved the basic physical question of why the effective stress should remain independent of the local thermodynamic regime \\citep{pringle1981}. The RPD regions being thermally and viscously unstable when the stress scales with total pressure, is the classical \\citet{lightman1974} instability, later developed by \\citet{ss1976} and generalized by \\citet{piran1978}; The $\\dot{M}$--$\\Sigma$ equilibrium curve then develops a negative-slope segment, producing the familiar unstable branch and motivating long-standing discussions of large-amplitude disk variability and limit-cycle behavior. The physical origin of this instability however remained uncertain, as constant $\\alpha$ is not a prediction of disk microphysics.\n\nIn sufficiently ionized disks, angular momentum transport is expected to arise from MHD turbulence driven by magnetorotational instability (MRI), rather than from a universal hydrodynamic viscosity \\citep{balbusHawley1991, hawley1995}. Thus, $\\alpha$ should be regarded as an effective closure parameter describing the nonlinear saturation of MRI, which may depend on the disk thermodynamic state. There is thus no {\\it a priori} reason for $\\alpha$ to remain invariant across the transition from gas-pressure dominated (GPD) to RPD regimes. Early magnetic-viscosity arguments already suggested that the inner RPD disk need not follow the naive total-pressure stress law \\citep{Sakimoto1981}. GRMHD simulations likewise indicate that $\\alpha$ need not be spatially constant \\citet{Penna2013, Abramowicz2026}.\n\nThis is reinforced by empirical, observational, and theoretical studies of thin, fully ionized disks showing that $\\alpha$ is not universal. Typical values are of order $\\alpha\\sim0.1$, while viable observational and numerical ones span $10^{-4} \\lesssim \\alpha \\lesssim 0.3$ \\citep{king2007,hirose2009}. More importantly, radiation-MHD simulations show that the RPD regime can deviate from constant-$\\alpha$ models (hereafter SS models). Stratified shearing-box calculations by \\citet{hirose2009} found no catastrophic thermal runaway showing that stress fluctuations can precede pressure fluctuations, challenging the interpretation of stress as a local function of total pressure. Larger-box simulations recover runaway behavior, but with heating, cooling, and vertical energy transport largely different from the SS expectations \\citep[see e.g.,][]{jiang2013b, jiang2019}. The central issue is thus whether a rigid SS closure is internally consistent for RPD MRI \\citep{blaes2025}.\n\nProposed remedies include gas- or mixed-pressure scaling in the stress law \\citep{Sakimoto1981, Stella1984, merloni2006}; introducing magnetically elevated or supported disks that alter the vertical structure and pressure balance \\citep{begelman2007, sadowski2016a}; incorporating wind-driven mass-loss that changes the local $\\dot{M}$ and $\\Sigma$ structure \\citep{Poutanen2007, Laor2014, habibi2019}; or adopting slim-disk solutions in which advective cooling becomes important \\citep{abramowicz1988, Chen1995}. These approaches, although valuable \\citep[e.g.,][]{lightman1974, zheng2011}, weaken the heating response in RPD regions by construction. In practice, they modify the stress law phenomenologically, invoke additional physics, or leave the standard TD branch.\n\nOur approach here is minimal. We retain the standard TD equations and ask what dependence of $\\alpha$ on the local thermodynamic state is required for a steady, self-consistent, and globally stable solution, without introducing additional physics. Unlike other prescriptions, the present form is not guessed, assumed, or imposed independently, but derived as a necessary condition required by TD equations. Defining $X \\equiv P_{\\rm gas}/P_{\\rm rad}$, we derive $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ by requiring both thermal stability of the local equilibrium solution and a single-valued $\\dot{M}$--$\\Sigma$ relation. The viscosity law thus emerges from the internal structure of standard TD framework.\n\nThis Letter shows that the SS closure is internally inconsistent in the RPD TD. Consistency imposes a lower bound on the logarithmic response of $\\alpha$ to the $X$. Once this bound is satisfied, the classical unstable branch disappears while the analytic TD structure is preserved. Thus, the RPD instability is not the consequence of radiation support, but is an artifact of enforcing an inconsistent closure across distinct thermodynamic regimes.\n\nThe paper is organized as follows. In Section~\\ref{sec:prescription} we introduce the consistent $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ closure derived from both the local thermal stability criterion and the structure of the $\\dot{M}$--$\\Sigma$ equilibrium curve. In Section~\\ref{sec:results} we show how it removes the classical unstable branch and modifies the disk structure. It is followed by discussion in Section~\\ref{sec:discussion}. We summarize the implications in Section~\\ref{sec:conclusion}.\n\n\\section{Self-consistent $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ prescription}\n\\label{sec:prescription}\n\nWe next examine how $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ affects the TD structure. We use the classical height-integrated, steady-state \\citet{SS1973} framework, adopting Newtonian gravity for simplicity. The only new element is that $\\alpha$ is no longer constant, but depends on the local pressure partition $X$, as\n\\begin{equation}\n\\alpha_{\\rm x} \\equiv \\alpha(X),\n\\qquad \\qquad {\\rm where} \\qquad \\qquad X \\equiv {P_{\\rm gas}}/{P_{\\rm rad}}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nA regime-dependent $\\alpha$ is a physically natural expectation rather than a new hypothesis. The novelty here is to examine this previously unexplored dependence explicitly and determine the behavior required for a globally thermally stable TD solution.\n\nA simple sufficient form that satisfies the stability condition (see the Appendix~\\ref{apnx:derivation} for derivations) is a power-law\n\\begin{equation}\n\\alpha_{\\rm x}=\\alpha_0\\,X_{\\rm x}^{p}, \n\\qquad \\qquad {\\rm with} \\qquad p > 4/7\n\\label{eq:power}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\alpha_0$ is a normalization factor.\n\nThe required response is derived from the condition that the equilibrium branch remain stable and single-valued. The result is not an ad hoc modification, but a constraint on the effective closure itself: any proposed stress prescription must have an effective $\\eta_{\\rm x}>4/7$ to avoid the classical RPD unstable branch.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{stability.png}\n \\vspace{-5pt}\n \\caption{The disk thermal--viscous stability with regime-dependent $\\alpha$, for $M_{\\bullet}=10^8$ at $r=20$. Multi-panel view of steady-state TD solutions (in cgs units) computed with $\\alpha_{\\rm x}=\\alpha_0\\,X^{p}$ (with arbitrarily $\\alpha_0=0.1$). Colors denote different indices $p$ as labeled; SS model ($p=0$) is labeled as $\\alpha_{\\rm ss}=0.1$. The equilibrium S-curves in the $\\Sigma$--$\\dot{M}$ plane (expressed in Eddington unit as $\\dot{m}=\\dot{M}/\\dot{M}_{\\rm Edd}$) is shown in \\textit{top middle} panel; the characteristic middle (unstable) branch present for $\\alpha_{\\rm ss}$ flattens with increasing $p$ and disappears for $p \\gtrsim 4/7$. $\\Delta$ is the thermal stability diagnostic shown in \\textit{bottom left} panel; the unstable regime ($\\Delta>0$) progressively shrinks as $p$ increases and vanishes for $p \\gtrsim 4/7$. \\textit{Bottom middle} panel shows that the multi-valued structure of temperature solutions collapses to a single monotonic branch as the disk becomes globally stable. \\textit{Bottom right} panel shows a monotonically increasing trend with $\\dot{m}$ for stabilized disk, with significant enhancement of optical thickness (and thus $\\Sigma$) in the inner disk, compared to standard SS model.}\n \\label{fig:stability}\n\\end{figure}\n\n\\section{Results}\\label{sec:results}\n\nFigure~\\ref{fig:stability} shows how $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ determines whether the classical unstable branch exists. It summarizes the behavior of disk solutions as a function of the slope $p$ in the emergent viscosity law $\\alpha_{\\rm x}\\propto X^{p}$, for $M_{\\bullet}=10^8$ at $r=20$, where $M_{\\bullet}= M_{\\rm bh}/M_{\\odot}$ is the black hole mass in solar unit, and $r=R/R_g$ is the dimensionless radius with $R_g=GM_{\\rm bh}/c^2$ the gravitational radius.\n\nThe top-left panel shows the effective $\\alpha$ versus $\\Sigma$. The larger the $p$ is, the more rapidly $\\alpha$ declines, suppressing viscosity in RPD regimes. The global effect is shown in the top-middle panel. For small $p$, the classical S-shaped $\\dot{M}$--$\\Sigma$ relation of RPD TD is recovered \\citep{SS1973, lightman1974}. As $p$ increases, the unstable middle branch shrinks, disappears for $p>4/7$, the sequence becomes monotonic, removing the thermal-viscous instability. This agrees with earlier expectations that a strong decline in $\\alpha$ in RPD regime suppresses the heating-cooling runaway \\citep[e.g.,][]{Stella1984}, but here follows directly from TD equations. The top-right panel shows $\\alpha$ versus viscous heating, revealing the weakened heating response that stabilizes the RPD branch. $\\alpha$ falls steeply at low $Q_{\\rm vis}$, then shows an inflection and flattens at high $Q_{\\rm vis}$, reflecting changes in the dominant opacity and cooling mechanisms.\nThe bottom-middle panel shows the corresponding temperature profiles. For low $p$, the turning point of the unstable branch remains visible, whereas for larger $p$ the profiles become smooth and single-valued. Thus, the disappearance of the S-curve reflects a continuous thermodynamic structure rather than a jump between branches.\nThe bottom-left panel shows the thermal stability parameter $\\Delta$. For small $p$, $\\Delta$ becomes positive over a finite range of $\\dot{M}$, recovering the classical instability criterion. As $p$ increases, the peak of $\\Delta$ drops and eventually remains negative for all $\\dot{M}$, demonstrating global thermal stability. The critical value $p=4/7$ thus emerges as the lower bound for marginal stability.\nThe bottom-right panel shows $\\tau$ versus $\\dot{m}$. For stabilized disks, $p > 4/7$, the optical depth increases monotonically with $\\dot{m}$. At fixed $\\dot{m}$ above $\\sim -2~\\rm dex$, larger $p$ gives systematically higher $\\tau$, reflecting the stronger temperature and density dependence of the opacity. The curves also steepen at high $\\dot{m}$ as the disk enters the RPD regime and the opacity approaches electron scattering.\n\nTaken together, the figure shows that $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ is not arbitrary: thermal equilibrium and stability require a regime-dependent stress response that recovers the classical unstable behavior for shallow slopes, but removes it above the critical slope. This provides a physically motivated route to stabilizing RPD disks without strong magnetic support or ad hoc stress prescriptions \\citep[e.g.,][]{jiang2013a, jiang2013b, sadowski2016a, sadowski2016b}, emphasizing the role of pressure partition, $X$, in regulating angular momentum transport.\n\n\\section{Discussion}\\label{sec:discussion}\n\n\\subsection{Implications for accretion studies}\n\nThe main result is that the classical radiation-pressure instability need not be intrinsic to radiation-supported accretion flows. Requiring the TD equations to remain thermally stable and single-valued in $\\dot{M}$--$\\Sigma$ plane forces the viscosity to respond to the local $X$. The instability is thus removed not by adding new physics, but by enforcing internal consistency in the standard TD framework.\n\nThis places our result within the classical stability problem. The original instability was derived within the SS framework \\citep{lightman1974, ss1976}, while \\citet{piran1978} emphasized that stability depends on the adopted heating and cooling closure. Our derivation sharpens this point by showing that the closure itself is constrained by the requirement that the equilibrium branch remain physically admissible.\n\nThis differs from earlier stabilization strategies. Gas-pressure or mixed-pressure prescriptions, including magnetically motivated variants, soften the stress response through assumed stress laws \\citep{Sakimoto1981, merloni2006, grzedzielski2017}; slim disks move to an advective branch \\citep{abramowicz1988}; and magnetically supported disks alter vertical support and stress balance \\citep{begelman2007, sadowski2016a}. By contrast, we show that even within the standard SS equations, the $\\alpha_{\\rm ss}$ closure is not self-consistent once radiation pressure becomes dynamically important.\n\nThe MRI context makes such a conclusion natural. Since angular momentum transport is MRI-driven \\citep{balbusHawley1991, hawley1995}, $\\alpha$ should describe the saturated turbulence rather than act as a a fundamental constant. It may thus depend on whether the disk is GPD or RPD, and on radiative diffusion, buoyancy, and vertical energy transport \\citep{blaes2001}. Without MRI saturation modeling, we identified the effective closure required for TD consistency.\n\nThis interpretation is broadly consistent with radiation-MHD simulations \\citep{hirose2009, jiang2013a, jiang2019}, showing that an total-pressure closure is incomplete. More generally, radiation-MHD stresses are time-dependent, spatially variable, and not instantaneous functions of local pressure. Our result suggests that instability persists only when the effective stress responds too weakly to changes in the local pressure partition.\n\nFuture work should connect this framework to advective, quasi-spherical, outflowing, and magnetically influenced accretion regimes \\citep{Narayan_1994, abramowicz1995, king2007, Mosallanezhad2014}. AGN extensions should include opacity effects, especially the iron-opacity bump, time-dependent evolution with $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ across RPD and unstable zones, and direct comparisons with 3D radiation-MHD simulations \\citep[e.g.,][]{jiang2016, jiang2019}.\n\n\\subsection{Implications for AGNs}\n\nObserved AGN disks already show tensions with the simplest TD predictions, but the main implication of the present closure is more basic: an RPD disk need not become low-column, thermally unstable, advective, or geometrically inflated. If the stress follows the local thermodynamic regime, the disk can remain RPD, optically thick, and thermally stable. The closure does not remove radiation pressure; it changes the disk response to it.\n\nThe structural reason is direct. In RPD regions, where $X$ is small, $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ is reduced. At fixed $\\dot{m}$, it is thus compensated by raising $\\Sigma$, rather than moving onto the low-column RPD branch. This removes the unstable low-$\\Sigma$ solution and enhances the inner disk optical thickness. Analytically, the deviation is controlled by $S\\propto \\dot{m}^{8}M_\\bullet{\\cal J}^{8}(r)r^{-21/2}$, and thus grows with both $M_\\bullet$ and, more strongly, $\\dot{m}$ (see the Appendix \\ref{sec:structure}).\n\nBecause $\\alpha_{\\rm x}\\propto X^p$ and $X$ varies with radius, the closure also produces a self-consistent radial viscosity profile, as an analytic analog of empirical or simulation-calibrated $\\alpha(r)$ models \\citep[see e.g.,][]{Penna2013, Abramowicz2026}.\n\nThis weakens the need for an early transition to a slim-disk at moderate to high $\\dot{m}$. Stability can be obtained while remaining close to a TD-like branch, which is relevant for quasars, NLS1s, SEAMBHs, and high-redshift luminous sources whose optical/UV continua are often interpreted with TD-like scalings even at high inferred accretion rates \\citep{Done2007, wang_shielding2014, DuPu2018, czerny2019Univ}. A suggestive example is the variable spectrum of a $z=6.51$ quasar accreting at $\\lambda_{\\rm Edd}\\sim0.6$, consistent with $\\lambda F_\\lambda\\propto\\lambda^{-4/3}$ \\citep{Leung2026}. Unlike slim disks, which stabilize high-accretion flows through advection in a geometrically thicker configuration \\citep{abramowicz1988}, the present closure stabilizes the RPD branch through the stress response while preserving a thin, smooth $H/R$ structure.\n\nA related implication concerns variability. The classical RPD instability predicts large-amplitude burst--quench cycles, yet such cycles are rare in luminous AGNs, although they remain relevant for some extreme Galactic accretors such as GRS~1915+105 \\citep{Belloni1997, Janiuk2011, Sniegowska2023}. Since $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ reduces the heating response to the RPD state and raises $\\Sigma$ and $\\tau$, the expected phenomenology is thus an optically thick, slowly evolving inner disk, rather than a violently intermittent one. This is qualitatively consistent with optical quasar variability studies, where damping times, variance, and power spectra depend on $M_\\bullet$, wavelength, $\\lambda_{\\rm Edd}$, and the probed timescale \\citep{McHardy2006, Arevalo2006, Kelly2009, Stone2022}. The observed suppression of optical variance with increasing $M_\\bullet$ and $\\lambda_{\\rm Edd}$ provides an empirical benchmark for the predicted increase of thermal and inflow timescales in RPD disks \\citep{Arevalo2023}. If the optical damping time traces the local thermal response, then $t_{\\rm th}/t_{\\rm dyn}\\sim\\alpha_{\\rm x}^{-1}$. For $M_\\bullet=10^9M_\\odot$ at $r=20$, $t_{\\rm dyn}\\sim5$ days, so a characteristic timescale $\\sim300$ days implies $\\alpha_{\\rm x}\\sim0.017$, as shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:variability}.\n\nThe geometric implications are also important. The fraction of coronal radiation intercepted by the disk, BLR illumination, self-shadowing, and wind shielding all depend on $H/R$. Slim-disk self-shadowing models predict strong anisotropy and multiple BLR zones with different lags and line widths \\citep{wang_shielding2014, DuPu2018}, while line-driven wind and obscurer models depend sensitively on geometry through X-ray shielding and UV illumination \\citep{Murray1995, Proga2000, Giustini2023}. In the present model, radiation pressure does not by itself force the inner disk into a puffed-up funnel. A smoother, thinner $H/R$ profile thus implies less extreme irradiation and shielding geometry than in strongly inflated slim disks \\citep{wang_shielding2014, DuPu2018}, while remaining closer to the thin branch than magnetically elevated or toroidally supported disks \\citep{begelman2007, Begelman2017}.\n\n\\begin{figure*}[ht]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=1.6\\columnwidth]{variability.png}\n \\caption{Radial behavior of $X$, and $\\alpha^{-1}_{\\rm x}$ for $M_{\\bullet}= 10^9$. The magenta dash-dotted line mark the long-timescale variability of $300$ days at $20~r_{\\rm g}$. The black horizontal dotted lines as annotated indicate different values of $\\alpha_{\\rm ss}$, with the physical saturation threshold of viscosity parameter at the bottom. Also, the opacity is treated as $\\kappa=\\kappa_{\\rm es}+\\kappa_{\\rm ff}$, where $\\kappa_{\\rm ff}=\\kappa_0\\, \\rho\\,T^{-7/2}$, with $\\kappa_0= 5\\times10^{24}~~{\\rm cm^5\\, g^{-2}\\, K^{7/2}}$ adopted here.}\n \\label{fig:variability}\n\\end{figure*}\n\nThe same structural changes may affect continuum-emitting regions. Microlensing and continuum-lag studies often infer optical sizes larger than predicted by the simplest TD model, while retaining wavelength dependences broadly consistent with disk-like reprocessing \\citep{Morgan2010, Jha2022, Hutsemekers2025}. Since the present height-integrated model essentially preserves the effective-temperature profile, it does not by itself solve the blackbody size discrepancy. Its robust implication is instead structural: larger $\\Sigma$ and $\\tau$ modify the vertical column in which the continuum is thermalized, potentially affecting color corrections, surface-brightness weighting, atmospheric thermalization depths, and lag normalization. Quantifying these effects requires disk-atmosphere and radiative-transfer calculations beyond the present treatment.\n\nOverall, the AGN implication of the $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ closure is that RPD disks can remain optically thick, stable, and TD-like while developing larger surface densities, longer response times, smoother thickness profiles, and modified illumination conditions. These changes affect precisely the inner-disk regime where variability, irradiation, winds, and continuum-size measurements are most sensitive to disk structure.\n\n\\section{Conclusions}\\label{sec:conclusion}\n\nWe have shown that internal consistency of the TD equations requires a pressure-dependent viscosity law. This preserves the analytic simplicity of the SS framework while removing the RPD instability: the unstable branch is not intrinsic to RPD disks, but due to imposing a thermodynamically invariant closure across distinct regimes. No new transport physics is introduced; the effective viscosity is simply allowed to respond to the local pressure partition, softening the heating response and restoring a single-valued TD solution.\n\nMoreover, the $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ closure smooths the scale-height response of the inner disk while raising its surface density, suggesting that moderate-to-high $\\dot{m}$ AGN disks can remain geometrically thin, optically even thicker without immediately turning slim. By lengthening both thermal and inflow timescales, it provides a natural route to accretion-state dependent variability without invoking large-amplitude radiation-pressure instability cycles. These structural changes may further affect irradiation geometry, BLR illumination, and wind launching, offering a coherent framework for luminous AGNs that remain stable despite classical SS expectations.\n\n\\begin{acknowledgements}\nThis work was supported by the F.R.S. FNRS under the research grant IISN 4.4503.19. DH is F.R.S.-FNRS Research Director.\n\\end{acknowledgements}\n\n\\bibliographystyle{aa}\n\\bibliography{naddaf}\n\n\\begin{appendix}\n\n\n\\section{TD stability condition}\\label{apnx:derivation}\n\nIn the present framework, $\\alpha$ is no longer constant, but\n\\begin{equation}\n\\alpha=\\alpha_{\\rm x},\n\\end{equation}\nand it depends locally on the thermodynamic state via\n\\begin{equation}\nX \\equiv {P_{\\rm gas}}\\,/\\,{P_{\\rm rad}}.\n\\end{equation}\nAny change in $X$ is thus reflected in value of $\\alpha$, i.e.\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:deltalnalpha}\n\\delta \\ln \\alpha = \\eta_{\\rm x}\\,\\delta \\ln X,\n\\end{equation}\nor, equivalently,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\eta_{\\rm x} = {d\\ln\\alpha}\\,/\\,{d\\ln X}.\n\\end{equation}\n\n\\subsection{Basic equations}\n\nThe following fundamental equations describe a steady, Keplerian, optically thick structure.\n\n(a) Vertical hydrostatic equilibrium:\n\\begin{equation}\nP_{\\rm tot} = \\Omega_K^2 \\Sigma H\\, /2,\n\\label{eq:hydrostatic}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\Omega_K = (GM/R^3)^{1/2}$ is the Keplerian angular velocity, and $\\Sigma = 2\\rho H$ is the surface density, where $\\rho$ is the midplane density, and $H$ is the pressure scale height.\n\\begin{equation}\nP_{\\rm tot} = P_{\\rm gas} + P_{\\rm rad},\n\\end{equation}\nis the total midplane pressure consisting of gas pressure and radiation pressure, where\n\\begin{equation}\nP_{\\rm gas} = (k_{\\rm B}/m_{\\rm H})~\\Sigma\\, T_c\\, H^{-1},\n\\label{eq:Pgas}\n\\end{equation}\n\\begin{equation}\nP_{\\rm rad} = a~T_c^4\\, / 3,\n\\label{eq:Prad}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $a$ is the radiation constant, $k_{\\rm B}$ the Boltzmann constant, and $m_{\\rm H}$ is the hydrogen mass.\n\n(b) Angular momentum transport\n\\begin{equation}\n3\\pi\\, \\nu \\Sigma = \\dot{M} \\mathcal{J}(R),\n\\label{eq:angmom}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\dot{M}$ is the accretion rate, $\\nu = \\alpha c_s H$ is the kinematic viscosity, $c_s=\\Omega_K H$ is the sound speed, and $\\mathcal{J}=1 - \\sqrt{R_{\\rm in}/{R}\\,}$ is the inner boundary correction.\n\n(c) Energy balance\n\\begin{equation}\nQ_{\\rm vis} = Q_{\\rm rad} + Q_{\\rm adv},\n\\end{equation}\ni.e. viscous dissipation balances cooling though radiation and advection, where\n\\begin{equation}\nQ_{\\rm vis} = 3\\,\\Omega_KH \\alpha\\, P_{\\rm tot}\\, /2,\n\\label{eq:visQ}\n\\end{equation}\n\\begin{equation}\n Q_{\\rm rad} = \\frac{32 \\sigma T_c^4}{3 \\tau},\n\\label{eq:radQ}\n\\end{equation}\n\\begin{equation}\nQ_{\\rm adv} = \\frac{\\mu \\dot{M} \\Omega_K^2 H^2}{2 \\pi R^2},\n\\label{eq:advQ}\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $T_c$ is the midplane temperature, and $\\tau=\\kappa \\Sigma/2$ is the vertical optical depth, with $\\kappa$ for the opacity.\n\n\\subsection{Thermal stability analysis with $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$}\n\nFor an infinitesimal temperature perturbation while \\(\\Sigma\\) is taken to be constant, thermal stability requires\n\\begin{equation}\n\\left({\\partial}\n\\left[Q_{\\rm vis}-Q_{\\rm rad}-Q_{\\rm adv}\\right]/{\\partial T}\\right)_{\\Sigma} < 0,\n\\end{equation}\nor, since $T>0$, simply\n\\begin{equation}\n\\delta Q_{\\rm vis}-\\delta Q_{\\rm rad}-\\delta Q_{\\rm adv}<0.\n\\end{equation}\nDefining\n\\begin{equation}\nf_{\\rm a}\\equiv {Q_{\\rm adv}}/{Q_{\\rm vis}},\n~~\nf_{\\rm r}\\equiv {Q_{\\rm rad}}/{Q_{\\rm vis}},\n~~\nf_{\\rm r}+f_{\\rm a}=1,\n\\end{equation}\n\nThen\n\\begin{equation}\nQ_{\\rm vis}\\left[\\delta\\ln Q_{\\rm vis}\n-f_{\\rm r}\\,\\delta\\ln Q_{\\rm rad}\n-f_{\\rm a}\\,\\delta\\ln Q_{\\rm adv}\\right]<0\n\\end{equation}\n\nSince $Q_{\\rm vis}>0$, the sign is set only by the bracket.\n\nThe dissipative heating, diffusive radiative cooling, the advective cooling terms \n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:deltaenergies}\n\\begin{split}\n&\\delta \\ln Q_{\\rm vis} = \\delta \\ln \\alpha+\\delta \\ln P_{\\rm tot}+\\delta \\ln H,\\\\\n&\\delta \\ln Q_{\\rm rad} = 4\\,\\delta \\ln T,\\\\\n&\\delta \\ln Q_{\\rm adv} = \\delta \\ln \\dot M+2\\,\\delta \\ln H.\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\n\nIn order to proceed, we define\n\\begin{equation}\n\\beta_{\\rm r}\\equiv {P_{\\rm rad}}/{P_{\\rm tot}},\n~~\\beta_{\\rm g}\\equiv {P_{\\rm gas}}/{P_{\\rm tot}},\n~~\\beta_{\\rm r}+\\beta_{\\rm g}=1.\n\\end{equation}\n\nTherefore, at a given radius for a fixed $\\Sigma$,\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:deltapressures}\n\\begin{split}\n&\\delta \\ln P_{\\rm tot}=\\delta \\ln H,\\\\\n&\\delta \\ln P_{\\rm tot}=\\beta_{\\rm r}\\,\\delta \\ln P_{\\rm rad}\n+\\beta_{\\rm g}\\,\\delta \\ln P_{\\rm gas},\\\\\n&\\delta \\ln P_{\\rm gas}=\\delta \\ln T-\\delta \\ln H,\\\\\n&\\delta \\ln P_{\\rm rad}=4\\,\\delta \\ln T,\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\nso\n\\begin{equation}\\label{eq:deltalnH}\n\\delta \\ln H= A\\,\\delta \\ln T\\,/D,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere\n\\begin{equation}\nA \\equiv 4-3\\beta_{\\rm g},\n\\qquad\nD \\equiv 1+\\beta_{\\rm g},\n\\end{equation}\n\nUsing $X \\equiv P_{\\rm gas}/P_{\\rm rad}$, we have\n\\begin{equation}\n\\delta \\ln X = \\delta \\ln P_{\\rm gas} - \\delta \\ln P_{\\rm rad},\n\\end{equation}\nwhich, combined with Eqs. \\ref{eq:deltalnalpha}, \\ref{eq:deltapressures}, and \\ref{eq:deltalnH}, yields\n\\begin{equation}\n\\delta \\ln \\alpha= -7\\, \\eta_{\\rm x}~\\delta \\ln T\\,/D\n\\end{equation}\n\nUsing the angular-momentum equation \n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{split}\n&\\delta \\ln \\dot M= \\delta \\ln \\alpha + \\delta \\ln P_{\\rm tot}+ \\delta \\ln H,\\\\\n&\\delta \\ln \\dot M= (2A-7\\eta_{\\rm x})\\,\\delta \\ln T\\,/D\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\n\nNow substituting into Eq.~(\\ref{eq:deltaenergies}):\n\\begin{equation}\n\\begin{split}\n&\\delta \\ln Q_{\\rm vis}= (2A-7\\eta_{\\rm x})\\,\\delta \\ln T\\,/D,\\\\\n&\\delta \\ln Q_{\\rm adv}= (4A-7\\eta_{\\rm x})\\,\\delta \\ln T\\,/D.\n\\end{split}\n\\end{equation}\n\nThen\n\\begin{equation}\n\\left[\\frac{2A-7\\eta_{\\rm x}}D-4f_{\\rm r}-f_{\\rm a}\\frac{4A-7\\eta_{\\rm x}}D\\right]\\delta \\ln T<0.\n\\end{equation}\n\nFor a positive temperature perturbation, \\(\\delta\\ln T>0\\), and as $D$ is always positive, stability condition reads as\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Delta=2A-4D+4f_a(D-A)-7(1-f_{\\rm a})\\eta_{\\rm x}<0,\n\\end{equation}\nThe most unstable regime corresponds to\n\\begin{equation}\n\\beta_{\\rm g} \\to 0, \n\\qquad \nf_{\\rm a} \\to 0,\n\\end{equation}\nthus, stability requires\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Delta = 4-7 \\eta_{\\rm x} < 0,\n\\end{equation}\n\\begin{equation}\n\\eta_{\\rm x} > {4}/{7} \\approx 0.571.\n\\end{equation}\n\n\\subsection{Constraining $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ from the $\\dot{M}$--$\\Sigma$ relation}\n\nWe now specialize to the RPD, radiatively cooled regime,\n\\begin{equation}\nP_{\\rm rad} \\gg P_{\\rm gas}, \\qquad Q_{\\rm adv} \\ll Q_{\\rm rad},\n\\end{equation}\nin which the classical thermal–viscous instability arises. We derive a general constraint on the functional form of the viscosity $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ from the structure of the $\\dot{M}$--$\\Sigma$ equilibrium curve, without assuming a specific parametric form. At fixed radius, the unstable branch lies in this regime, allowing the following scalings.\n\nFrom vertical hydrostatic equilibrium,\n\\begin{equation}\nP_{\\rm tot} \\propto \\Sigma H,\n\\end{equation}\nand in the RPD limit,\n\\begin{equation}\nP_{\\rm tot} \\approx P_{\\rm rad} \\propto T^4,\n\\end{equation}\nwhich gives\n\\begin{equation}\nH \\propto {T^4}\\,{\\Sigma}^{-1}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nThe gas pressure scales as\n\\begin{equation}\nP_{\\rm gas} \\propto \\rho T \\propto {\\Sigma\\, T}\\, {H}^{-1},\n\\end{equation}\nand therefore\n\\begin{equation}\nP_{\\rm gas} \\propto {\\Sigma^2}{T^{-3}}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nCombining these expressions, we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\nX \\equiv {P_{\\rm gas}}/{P_{\\rm rad}} \\propto {\\Sigma^2}\\,{T^{-7}}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nThe viscous heating rate scales as\n\\begin{equation}\nQ_{\\rm vis} \\propto \\alpha P_{\\rm tot} H\n\\propto \\alpha {T^8}{\\Sigma}^{-1},\n\\end{equation}\nwhile radiative cooling gives\n\\begin{equation}\nQ_{\\rm rad} \\propto {T^4}{\\Sigma}^{-1}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nThermal equilibrium $Q_{\\rm vis} = Q_{\\rm rad}$ then implies\n$\\alpha\\,T^4 = \\mathrm{const}.$, hence, $T^4 \\propto \\alpha^{-1}$.\nSubstituting into the expression for $X$ yields\n\\begin{equation}\nX \\propto \\Sigma^2\\,\\alpha^{7/4},\n\\end{equation}\nwhich determines $X(\\Sigma)$ along the equilibrium branch\n\nTaking the logarithm of the constraint equation,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\ln X - \\frac{7}{4} \\ln \\alpha_{\\rm x} = 2 \\ln \\Sigma + \\mathrm{const},\n\\end{equation}\nand differentiating with respect to $\\ln \\Sigma$, we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\n{d\\ln X}/{d\\ln \\Sigma} ={8}/{(4 - 7\\eta_{\\rm x})}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nFrom angular momentum transport,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\dot{M} \\propto \\alpha P_{\\rm tot} H \\propto \\alpha {T^8}{\\Sigma}^{-1}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nUsing the thermal equilibrium condition, we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\n\\dot{M} \\propto {\\alpha_{\\rm x}^{-1}}{\\Sigma}^{-1}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nThus, the full $\\dot{M}(\\Sigma)$ relation is determined by the implicit\ndependence $X(\\Sigma)$.\n\nDifferentiating $\\ln \\dot{M}$ gives\n\\begin{equation}\n{d\\ln \\dot{M}}/{d\\ln \\Sigma}\n= -1 - \\eta_{\\rm x}~ {d\\ln X}/{d\\ln \\Sigma}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nSubstituting, we find\n\\begin{equation}\n{d\\ln \\dot{M}}/{d\\ln \\Sigma}\n= ({\\eta_{\\rm x} + 4})/({7\\eta_{\\rm x}-4}).\n\\end{equation}\n\nThis equation gives the general slope of the $\\dot{M}$–$\\Sigma$ equilibrium curve for an arbitrary $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$. The classical instability corresponds to the denominator changing sign, producing a negative-slope segment. Requiring ${d\\ln \\dot{M}}/{d\\ln \\Sigma} > 0$, yields a necessary condition for the absence of the unstable branch. For $\\eta_{\\rm x} > 0$, this implies\n\\begin{equation}\n\\eta_{\\rm x} > {4}/{7} \\approx 0.571.\n\\end{equation}\n\n\\subsection{Implications for $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$}\n\nA simple sufficient prescription satisfying the stability condition derived above is a power-law form\n\\begin{equation}\n\\alpha_{\\rm x}=\\alpha_0\\,X^{p}, \\qquad p > 4/7\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\alpha_0$ is a normalization constant setting the overall amplitude of the effective viscosity.\n\nHence, the requirement of a single-valued thermally stable equilibrium solution directly implies that viscosity must increase sufficiently steeply with $X$. The functional form of $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ is thus not arbitrary, but imposed by internal consistency of TD equations.\n\nThe power-law form should be interpreted as the local response of the effective viscosity to the pressure partition, rather than a global prescription for its absolute value. In practice, $\\alpha$ remains bounded, since $X$ is finite across disk regimes, and the normalization $\\alpha_0$ can be chosen to keep $\\alpha$ within the empirically expected range. We adopt $X \\equiv P_{\\rm gas}/P_{\\rm rad}$, so that RPD regions correspond to $X \\ll 1$. This choice is arbitrary up to inversion: defining instead $P_{\\rm rad}/P_{\\rm gas}$ would lead to an equivalent constraint with reversed sign, without affecting the physical conclusion.\n\n\\subsection{Structural changes with $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$}\n\\label{sec:structure}\n\nThe total pressure can be written as\n\\begin{equation}\nP_{\\rm tot}=P_{\\rm rad}+P_{\\rm gas}=P_{\\rm rad}(1+X)\\propto T^4(1+X).\n\\end{equation}\n\nFrom vertical hydrostatic balance,\n\\begin{equation}\n T^4\\propto\\, \\Omega_K^{2} \\, \\Sigma H(1+X)^{-1},\n\\end{equation}\nand from angular momentum transport,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Sigma \\propto \\dot{M}\n\\mathcal{J}\\, \\alpha^{-1} \\Omega_K^{-1} H^{-2}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nNow using $X\\propto {\\Sigma}{H^{-1}T^{-3}}$, one obtains\n\\begin{align}\nH^9 &\\propto \\dot{M} \\mathcal{J}\\, \\Omega_K^{-7} \\alpha^{-1} X^{-4} (1+X)^3,\\\\\nT_c^9 &\\propto \\dot{M}^{2} \\mathcal{J}^{2}\\, \\Omega_K^{4} \\alpha^{-2} X (1+X)^{-3},\\\\\n\\Sigma^9 &\\propto \\dot{M}^{7} \\mathcal{J}^{7}\\, \\Omega_K^{5}\\, \\alpha^{-7} X^{8} (1+X)^{-6}.\n\\end{align}\n\nMoreover, the energy balance ($Q_{\\rm vis}=Q_{\\rm rad}+Q_{\\rm adv}$) leads to a quadratic equation for $H$,\n\\begin{equation}\nH^2 + \\frac{8\\pi c R^2}{\\kappa \\mu \\dot{M} (1+X)} H - \\frac{\\mathcal{J} R^2}{2\\mu }=0,\n\\end{equation}\nyielding, to leading order,\n\\begin{equation}\nH \\propto \\kappa\\, \\dot{M} \\mathcal{J}(1+X),\n\\end{equation}\nthus,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{eq:scalingX}\n X^{4} (1+X)^{6} \\propto \\kappa^{-9}\\,\\dot{M}^{-8} \\mathcal{J}^{-8}\\, \\alpha^{-1} \\Omega_K^{-7}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nAt given $R$, $M$, and $\\dot M$, the\nlogarithmic differences between the solutions are\n\\begin{align}\n\\label{eq:Del_H1}\n&\\delta\\ln H =\\delta\\ln \\kappa + \\delta \\ln (1+X),\\\\\n9\\, &\\delta \\ln H=\n-4\\, \\delta\\ln X\n+3\\, \\delta \\ln (1+X)\n- \\delta\\ln\\alpha,\\\\\n9\\, &\\delta\\ln T=\n\\delta\\ln X\n-3\\, \\delta \\ln (1+X)\n-2\\, \\delta\\ln\\alpha,\\\\\n9\\, &\\delta\\ln\\Sigma=\n8\\, \\delta\\ln X\n-6\\, \\delta \\ln (1+X)\n-7\\,\\delta\\ln\\alpha,\\\\\n\\label{eq:Del_X}\n4\\,&\\delta \\ln X\n+6\\,\\delta \\ln (1+X)\n=-9\\, \\delta\\ln \\kappa -\\delta \\ln \\alpha.\n\\end{align}\n\nWe compare the TD structures obtained with $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ to those of the SS model using the differential logarithmic relations we just found (Eqs.~\\ref{eq:Del_H1}--\\ref{eq:Del_X}), focusing on the inner regions dominated by electron-scattering opacity, $\\kappa=\\kappa_{\\rm es}$,\n\\begin{align}\n6\\, &\\delta \\log H=\n~\\, \\mathcal{A}\n-4\\, \\delta\\log X,\\\\\n6\\, &\\delta\\log T=\n~\\, \\mathcal{A}\n+2\\, \\delta\\log X,\\\\\n3\\, &\\delta\\log\\Sigma=\n2\\, \\mathcal{A}\n+4\\, \\delta\\log X,\\\\\n4\\, &\\delta \\log X\n+6\\,\\delta \\log (1+X)\n=\\mathcal{A},\n\\end{align}\nwhere\n\\begin{equation}\n\\mathcal{A}=\n-\\delta \\log \\alpha =\n\\log \\alpha_{\\rm ss}\n-\\log \\alpha_{\\rm 0}\n-p \\log X_{\\rm x}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nThis yields\n\\begin{equation}\n(4+p)\\delta \\log X\n+6\\delta \\log (1+X)\n=\\log (\\alpha_{\\rm ss}/\\alpha_{\\rm 0})\n-p \\log X_{\\rm ss}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nFrom Eq.~\\ref{eq:scalingX}, we have\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{eq:pressure_partition}\nX^{4} \\, (1+X)^{6} = C\\, S^{-1}\\, \\alpha^{-1},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere\n$C_0 \\simeq 10^{-23}\n\\left({\\eta}/{0.1}\\right)^8\n\\left({\\kappa}/{0.34}\\right)^{-9}\n\\left({\\mu_m}/{0.615}\\right)^{-4}$,\ncollects physical constants, and dimensionless parameter $S$ is given by\n\\begin{equation}\nS={\\dot{m}^{8}\\,M_{\\bullet}\\,\n\\mathcal{J}^{8}(r)}\\,{r^{-21/2}}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nThis gives,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\log X_{\\rm ss}= \\left(\\log C - \\log S - \\log \\alpha_{\\rm ss}\\right)\\,/q,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $q=4$ and $q=10$, in RPD ($X \\ll 1$) and GPD ($X \\gg 1$) regions, respectively.\n\nFrom Eq.~\\ref{eq:Del_H1}, we further note that in the RPD regime $\\delta\\log H \\simeq 0$, but in the GPD regime $\\delta\\log H \\simeq \\delta\\log X$. This shows that the $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ prescription largely preserves the geometrically thin structure of the disk.\n\nThe structural scalings then reduce to\n\\begin{align}\n&\\delta \\log \\Sigma =\n4\\, \\delta\\log T=\n4\\, \\delta\\log X=\n\\mathcal{A}_{\\rm rad},\\\\\n&\\delta \\log \\Sigma =\n4\\, \\delta\\log T =\n8\\, \\delta\\log H =\n8\\, \\delta\\log X=\n0.8\\, \\mathcal{A}_{\\rm gas},\n\\end{align}\nwhere the regime-dependent $\\mathcal{A}$ is\n\\begin{equation}\n\\mathcal{A}= \\frac{p \\log S\n+(p+q) \\log \\alpha_{\\rm ss}\n-q \\log \\alpha_0\n+23\\, p}{(p+q)}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nFor $\\alpha_{\\rm ss}=0.1$, this becomes\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{eq:deviation}\n\\mathcal{A}=\n\\frac{p}{(p+q)}\\left( \\log S + 22\\right)\n-\\frac{q}{(p+q)} \\left(\\log \\alpha_0+1\\right).\n\\end{equation}\n\nThe resulting $\\mathcal{A}$, the logarithmic deviation from SS model, provides an accurate description for $\\log \\dot{m} \\gtrsim -1$, where the optically thick radiative cooling assumption holds, and for $\\log M_{\\bullet} \\gtrsim 4$, where the quadratic solution for $H$ remains valid.\n\n\\begin{figure}[t]\n \\centering\n \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{comparison.png}\n \\caption{Radial behavior of the logarithmic deviation parameter $\\mathcal{A}$ for $M_\\bullet = 10^6$ and $\\dot{m}=0.1$, with $\\kappa=\\kappa_{\\rm es}$. Solid curves correspond to the RPD scaling ($\\mathcal{A}_{\\rm rad}$ with $q=4$), while dashed curves represent the GPD regime ($\\mathcal{A}_{\\rm gas}$ with $q=10$). The right panel extends the left panel. Different colors indicate the slope $p$ of the viscosity law, with $\\alpha_0=0.01$. The horizontal dotted line marks $\\mathcal{A}=0$, corresponding to no deviation from the standard SS solution.}\n \\label{fig:comparison}\n\\end{figure}\n\nFigure~\\ref{fig:comparison} shows how the deviation parameter $\\mathcal{A}$ (Sec.~\\ref{sec:structure}), which measures the logarithmic differences between the $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ and $\\alpha_{\\rm ss}$ solutions, varies with radius for representative $p$. It follows the analytic scaling in Eq.~\\ref{eq:deviation}, depending on both $S$ and $p$, with $q$ weighting the two pressure regimes. In the RPD regime, the solid curves show $\\mathcal{A}>0$ over a broad radial range, implying higher temperatures and surface densities than in the SS model. The deviation grows in magnitude and radial extent with $p$, reflecting the stronger sensitivity of viscosity to pressure partition. In the GPD regime, the dashed curves decline with radius, eventually crossing zero and becoming negative, indicating lower structural quantities than in the SS solutions. Since $X$ increases outward (Eq.~\\ref{eq:pressure_partition}), the RPD and GPD regimes correspond to the inner and outer disk, respectively. The figure also shows that the radial profiles steepen with increasing $p$. For the marginally stable case, $p=4/7$, the deviations are mild and extend over a broad radial range, whereas larger $p$ produces stronger and more localized deviations, yielding a sharper RPD-GPD transition as $\\mathcal{A}$ declines rapidly toward the outer disk.\n\nSince $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ reduces the sensitivity of heating to the RPD state and increases $\\Sigma$ and $\\tau$, it should produce a more slowly evolving inner flow. In the present model,\n\\begin{equation}\n\\delta\\log t_{\\rm thermal} =\n\\delta\\log t_{\\rm inflow} =\n- \\delta\\log \\alpha =\n\\mathcal{A}_{\\rm rad},\n\\end{equation}\nwhich is positive over a broad range of inner disk radii, as shown in Fig.~\\ref{fig:comparison}. \n\nOverall, the $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ prescription preserves the geometrically thin disk structure while introducing controlled, regime-dependent changes in the thermodynamic variables. These changes remain continuous across the RPD-GPD transition, reflecting the removal of the multi-valued unstable branch.\n\n\\subsection{Asymptotic structural scaling solutions with $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$}\n\nWe now examine how the $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ prescription modifies the asymptotic TD scalings.\nThe effective viscosity varies with the local pressure partition. This changes the response of disk structure to the system global parameters (Eq.~\\ref{eq:scalingX}), as\n\\begin{equation}\nX \\propto\n\\left(\\alpha_0\\, \\kappa^{9}\\, \\dot{M}^{8}\\mathcal{J}^{8}\\,\\Omega_K^{7}\n\\right)^{-1/(q+p)},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $q=4$ and $q=10$, in RPD ($X \\ll 1$) and GPD ($X \\gg 1$) regions, respectively.\n\nThus, compared with the $\\alpha_{\\rm ss}$ case, the dependence of $X$ power on the system global parameters is weakened from $q^{-1}$ to $(q+p)^{-1}$.\n\nThe disk thickness in RPD regime, follows from substituting the asymptotic solution for $X$, yielding\n\\begin{equation}\nH_{\\rm rad} \\propto \\kappa\\,\\dot{M}\\,\\mathcal{J}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nTherefore, in this limit, the explicit dependence on $\\alpha_0$ and $p$ cancels from the leading-order thickness scaling. The main structural changes instead appear in the mid-plane temperature, and surface density, as\n\\begin{align}\nT_{\\rm rad} &\\propto\n\\left(\\kappa^{2p-1}\\,\\dot{M}^{2p}\\mathcal{J}^{2p}\\,\\Omega_K^{2p+1}\n\\alpha_0^{-1}\\right)^{1/(4+p)},\\\\\n\\Sigma_{\\rm rad} &\\propto\n\\left(\\kappa^{7p-8}\\,\\dot{M}^{7p-4}\\mathcal{J}^{7p-4}\\,\\Omega_K^{6p-4}\n\\alpha_0^{-4}\\right)^{1/(4+p)}.\n\\end{align}\n\nThus, in the RPD branch, the $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ prescription mainly redistributes the classical dependence of $T_c$ and $\\Sigma$ on the disk system global parameters and on the viscosity normalization $\\alpha_0$. Since $X\\ll 1$, a positive $p$ implies $\\alpha_{\\rm x}=\\alpha_0X^p < \\alpha_0$, leading to a reduced effective viscosity in the RPD part of the disk.\n\nIn the opposite, GPD limit, we end up with\n\\begin{align} \nH_{\\rm rad} &\\propto \\left(\\kappa^{p+1}\\,\\dot{M}^{p+2}\\,\\mathcal{J}^{p+2}\\,\\Omega_K^{-7}\n\\alpha_0^{-1}\\right)^{1/(10+p)},\\\\\nT_{\\rm rad} &\\propto\n\\left(\\kappa^{2p+2}\\dot{M}^{2p+4}\\mathcal{J}^{2p+4}\\,\\Omega_K^{2p+6}\n\\alpha_0^{-2}\\right)^{1/(10+p)},\\\\\n\\Sigma_{\\rm rad} &\\propto\n\\left(\\kappa^{7p-2}\\,\\dot{M}^{7p+6}\\mathcal{J}^{7p+6}\\,\\Omega_K^{6p+4}\n\\alpha_0^{-8}\\right)^{1/(10+p)}.\n\\end{align}\n\nThese asymptotic relations show explicitly where the new closure departs from the classical $\\alpha_{\\rm ss}$ solution. The modification does not simply rescale the SS disk by a constant factor; rather, it changes the local power-law response of the disk structure through the pressure ratio.\n\nThe dimensionless form of asymptotic scaling relations derived under the $\\alpha_{\\rm x}$ prescription, separated into three main regimes analogous to the standard SS-disk regions, are presented in the following\n\n\\subsubsection{Region A: RPD ($X\\ll1$), with $\\kappa_{\\rm es}$}\n\\vspace{-6pt}\n\n\\begin{alignat}{9}\nH~ &\\propto ~~\\dot{m}\\, \\mathcal{J}\\, M_{\\bullet}\\\\\n{\\scriptstyle{H/R}} &\\propto ~~\\dot{m}\\, \\mathcal{J}\\, r^{-1}\\\\\nT_c ~&\\propto \\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{-1} &&(~\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J}~)^{2p}~~~~~ &&r^{-3p-3/2}~~ &&\\alpha_0^{-1}~\\big)^w\\\\\n\\Sigma ~&\\propto \\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{p} &&(~\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J}~)^{7p-4} &&r^{-9p+6} &&\\alpha_0^{-4}~\\big)^w\\\\\n\\rho ~&\\propto \\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{-4} &&(~\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J}~)^{6p-8} &&r^{-9p+6} &&\\alpha_0^{-4}~\\big)^w\\\\\nP ~&\\propto \\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{-1} &&(~\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J}~)^{2p} &&r^{-3p-3/2} &&\\alpha_0^{-1}~\\big)^{4w}\\\\\nX ~&\\propto \\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{-1} &&(~\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J}~)^{-8} &&r^{21/2} \n&&\\alpha_0^{-1}~\\big)^{w}\n\\end{alignat}\nwith $w=1/(4+p)$.\n\n\\subsubsection{Region B: GPD ($X\\gg1$), with $\\kappa_{\\rm es}$}\n\\vspace{-9pt}\n\\begin{alignat}{9}\nH~ &\\propto \\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{p+9}~~~ &&(~\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J}~)^{p+2}~~~~&&r^{21/2}~~~~~~~~ &&\\alpha_0^{-1}~\\big)^w\\\\\n{\\scriptstyle{H/R}} &\\propto \\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{-1} &&(~\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J}~)^{p+2}&&r^{1/2-p} &&\\alpha_0^{-1}~\\big)^w\\\\\nT_c ~&\\propto \\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{-2} &&(~\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J}~)^{2p+4}&&r^{-3p-9} &&\\alpha_0^{-2}~\\big)^w\\\\\n\\Sigma ~&\\propto \\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{p+2} &&(~\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J}~)^{7p+6}&&r^{-9p-6} &&\\alpha_0^{-8}~\\big)^w\\\\\n\\rho ~&\\propto \\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{-7} &&(~\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J}~)^{6p+4}&&r^{33/2-9p} &&\\alpha_0^{-7}~\\big)^w\\\\\nP ~&\\propto \\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{-9} &&(~\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J}~)^{8p+8}&&r^{15/2-12p} &&\\alpha_0^{-9}~\\big)^w\\\\\nX ~&\\propto \\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{-1} &&(~\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J}~)^{-8} &&r^{21/2} \n&&\\alpha_0^{-1}~\\big)^{w}\n\\end{alignat}\nwith $w=1/(10+p)$.\n\n\\subsubsection{Region C: GPD ($X\\gg1$), with $\\kappa_{\\rm ff}$}\nIn this region, the opacity is dominated by bound-free/free-free absorption (Kramers opacity) which has the form $\\kappa_{\\rm ff}\\propto \\rho\\,T^{-7/2}$.\n\\begin{alignat}{12}\nH~ &\\propto &&\\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{p+9}~ &&(\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J})^{(p+3)/2}~~ &&r^{3(p+15)/4}~~~~ &&\\alpha_0^{-1}~\\big)^w\\\\\n{\\scriptstyle{H/R}} &\\propto &&\\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{-1} &&(\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J})^{p+2}&&r^{-(p-5)/4} &&\\alpha_0^{-1}~\\big)^w\\\\\nT_c ~&\\propto &&\\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{-2} &&(\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J})^{p+3}&&r^{-3(p+5)/2} &&\\alpha_0^{-2}~\\big)^w\\\\\n\\Sigma ~&\\propto &&\\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{p+2} &&(\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J})^{7(p+2)/2}&&r^{-15(p+2)/4} &&\\alpha_0^{-8}~\\big)^w\\\\\n\\rho ~&\\propto &&\\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{-7} &&(\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J})^{3p+11/2}&&r^{(-18p-75)/4} &&\\alpha_0^{-7}~\\big)^w\\\\\nP ~&\\propto &&\\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{-9} &&(\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J})^{4p+17/2}&&r^{-6p-105/4} &&\\alpha_0^{-9}~\\big)^w\\\\\nX ~&\\propto &&\\big(~M_{\\bullet}^{-1} &&(~\\dot{m}\\mathcal{J}~)^{-7/2} &&r^{15/4} \n&&\\alpha_0^{-1}~\\big)^{w}\n\\end{alignat}\nwith $w=1/(10+p)$.\n\nThe classic SS asymptotic behavior is recovered for $p=0$, and the TD become globally stable for $p>4/7$.\n\nIt also reduces to the prescription of \\citet{Sakimoto1981} for $p=1$, because in the RPD regime, $P_{\\rm rad}\\gg P_{\\rm gas}$, so $P_{\\rm tot}\\simeq P_{\\rm rad}$, and therefore $T_{r\\phi}\\propto \\alpha_0 P_{\\rm gas}.$\nThe key point, however, is that unlike \\citet{Sakimoto1981}, who directly imposed gas-pressure scaling, the present closure, $\\alpha_{\\rm x}=\\alpha_0 X^p$, emerges from the TD consistency requirement and recovers a gas-pressure-like stress only as the $p=1$ RPD-limit case.\n\n\\end{appendix}\n\n\\end{document}\n\n"}}},{"rowIdx":3091199,"cells":{"id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31999"},"yymm_id":{"kind":"string","value":"2606.31999"},"submitter":{"kind":"string","value":"Konstantin Osetrin"},"authors":{"kind":"string","value":"Vladimir Epp and Konstantin Osetrin and Taya But"},"title":{"kind":"string","value":"Electromagnetic radiation from a point-like charge in a weak gravitational wave: a Shapiro-delay-motivated approach"},"comments":{"kind":"string","value":"19 pages, 10 figures"},"journal-ref":{"kind":"null"},"doi":{"kind":"null"},"report-no":{"kind":"null"},"categories":{"kind":"string","value":"gr-qc hep-th math-ph math.MP"},"license":{"kind":"string","value":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/"},"abstract":{"kind":"string","value":"We investigate the field of a point-like electric charge freely falling in a gravitational wave. In the presence of a gravitational wave, the initially static Coulomb field of the charge becomes time-dependent and generates corresponding radiation. The gravitational wave is treated as a weak perturbation of the Minkowski metric. The electromagnetic four-potential of the charge is sought as a solution to Maxwell's equations in the gravitational wave metric, to first order in perturbation theory. The potentials of the point charge are found in quadratures throughout the space. To regularize the potentials, an approach motivated by the Shapiro effect for the time delay of radiation in a gravitational field is used. The potentials of the charge in the far zone are calculated explicitly for a monochromatic, arbitrarily polarized gravitational wave. The angular distribution of the electromagnetic radiation induced by the gravitational wave is obtained."},"versions":{"kind":"list like","value":[{"version":"v1","created":"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:33:25 GMT"}],"string":"[\n {\n \"version\": \"v1\",\n \"created\": \"Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:33:25 GMT\"\n }\n]","isConversational":false},"update_date":{"kind":"string","value":"2026-07-01"},"authors_parsed":{"kind":"list like","value":[["Epp","Vladimir",""],["Osetrin","Konstantin",""],["But","Taya",""]],"string":"[\n [\n \"Epp\",\n \"Vladimir\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"Osetrin\",\n \"Konstantin\",\n \"\"\n ],\n [\n \"But\",\n \"Taya\",\n \"\"\n ]\n]","isConversational":false},"latex":{"kind":"string","value":"================================================\nFILE: ENG_Preprint_Epp_PRD_Time_delay_v_05_List.tex\n================================================\n%% ****** Start of file apstemplate.tex ****** %\n%%\n%%\n%% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4.2 distribution.\n%% Version 4.2a of REVTeX, January, 2015\n%%\n%%\n%% Copyright (c) 2015 The American Physical Society.\n%%\n%% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.\n%%\n%\n% This is a template for producing manuscripts for use with REVTEX 4.2\n% Copy this file to another name and then work on that file.\n% That way, you always have this original template file to use.\n%\n% Group addresses by affiliation; use superscriptaddress for long\n% author lists, or if there are many overlapping affiliations.\n% For Phys. Rev. appearance, change preprint to twocolumn.\n% Choose pra, prb, prc, prd, pre, prl, prstab, prstper, or rmp for journal\n% Add 'draft' option to mark overfull boxes with black boxes\n% Add 'showkeys' option to make keywords appear\n%\\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,groupedaddress]{revtex4-2}\n\\documentclass[aps,prd,preprint,superscriptaddress]{revtex4-2}\n%\\usepackage{hyperref}\n%\\documentclass[aps,prl,reprint,groupedaddress]{revtex4-2}\n%\\usepackage{hyperref}\n% You should use BibTeX and apsrev.bst for references\n% Choosing a journal automatically selects the correct APS\n% BibTeX style file (bst file), so only uncomment the line\n% below if necessary.\n%\\bibliographystyle{apsrev4-2}\n\\bibliographystyle{apsrev4-2}\n\\usepackage{hyperref}\n\\usepackage{graphicx}\n\\usepackage{epstopdf}\n\\usepackage{latexsym,amssymb}\n\\usepackage{amsmath}\n\n\\newcommand{\\boldfontmath}[1]{\\mbox{\\boldmath$#1$}}\n\n\\begin{document}\n\n% Use the \\preprint command to place your local institutional report\n% number in the upper righthand corner of the title page in preprint mode.\n% Multiple \\preprint commands are allowed.\n% Use the 'preprintnumbers' class option to override journal defaults\n% to display numbers if necessary\n%\\preprint{}\n\n%Title of paper\n\n\\title{Electromagnetic radiation from a point-like charge in a weak gravitational wave: a Shapiro-delay-motivated approach}\n\t\n% repeat the \\author .. \\affiliation etc. as needed\n% \\email, \\thanks, \\homepage, \\altaffiliation all apply to the current\n% author. Explanatory text should go in the []'s, actual e-mail\n% address or url should go in the {}'s for \\email and \\homepage.\n% Please use the appropriate macro foreach each type of information\n\n% \\affiliation command applies to all authors since the last\n% \\affiliation command. The \\affiliation command should follow the\n% other information\n% \\affiliation can be followed by \\email, \\homepage, \\thanks as well.\n\n%\\author{Konstantin E. Osetrin}\n%\\email[]{Your e-mail address}\n%\\homepage[]{Your web page}\n%\\thanks{}\n%\\altaffiliation{}\n%\\affiliation{Center for Mathematical and Computer Physics of Tomsk State Pedagogical University}\n%\\affiliation{National Research Tomsk State University}\n\n\\author{Vladimir \\surname{Epp}}\n\\email[]{epp@tspu.ru}\n%\\homepage[]{\\url{https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4739-2788}}\n\\homepage[]{https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4868-2683}\n%\\thanks{}\n%\\altaffiliation{}\n\\affiliation{Tomsk State Pedagogical University\n\\\\634061, Tomsk, Kievskaya str.60, Russia}\n\n\\author{Konstantin \\surname{Osetrin}}\n\\email[]{osetrin@tspu.ru}\n%\\homepage[]{\\url{https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4739-2788}}\n\\homepage[]{https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4739-2788}\n%\\thanks{}\n%\\altaffiliation{}\n\\affiliation{Tomsk State Pedagogical University\n\\\\634061, Tomsk, Kievskaya str.60, Russia}\n\\affiliation{Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics\n\\\\634050, Tomsk, Lenin str.40, Russia}\n\n\\author{Taya \\surname{But}}\n\\email[]{buttv@tspu.ru}\n%\\homepage[]{\\url{https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4739-2788}}\n%\\homepage[]{}\n%\\thanks{}\n%\\altaffiliation{}\n\\affiliation{Tomsk State Pedagogical University\n\\\\634061, Tomsk, Kievskaya str.60, Russia}\n\n%\\author{Evgeny K. \\surname{Osetrin}}\n%\\email[]{evgeny.osetrin@tspu.edu.ru}\n%\\homepage[]{\\url{https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5998-2238}}\n%\\thanks{}\n%\\altaffiliation{}\n%\\affiliation{Center for Mathematical and Computer Physics of Tomsk State Pedagogical University}\n%\\author{Elena I. \\surname{Osetrina}}\n%\\email[]{elena.osetrina@tspu.edu.ru}\n%\\homepage[]{\\url{https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5676-4614}}\n%\\thanks{}\n%\\altaffiliation{}\n%\\affiliation{Center for Mathematical and Computer Physics of Tomsk State Pedagogical University}\n\n%Collaboration name if desired (requires use of superscriptaddress\n%option in \\documentclass). \\noaffiliation is required (may also be\n%used with the \\author command).\n%\\collaboration can be followed by \\email, \\homepage, \\thanks as well.\n%\\collaboration{}\n%\\noaffiliation\n\n\\date{\\today}\n\n\\begin{abstract}\n% insert abstract here\nWe investigate the field of a point-like electric charge freely falling in a gravitational wave. In the presence of a gravitational wave, the initially static Coulomb field of the charge becomes time-dependent and generates corresponding radiation. The gravitational wave is treated as a weak perturbation of the Minkowski metric. The electromagnetic four-potential of the charge is sought as a solution to Maxwell's equations in the gravitational wave metric, to first order in perturbation theory. \nThe potentials of the point charge are found in quadratures throughout the space. \nTo regularize the potentials, an approach motivated by the Shapiro effect for the time delay of radiation in a gravitational field is used.\nThe potentials of the charge in the far zone are calculated explicitly for a monochromatic, arbitrarily polarized gravitational wave. The angular distribution of the electromagnetic radiation induced by the gravitational wave is obtained.\n\\end{abstract}\n\n% insert suggested keywords - APS authors don't need to do this\n%\\keywords{gravitation,cosmology,gravitational waves,Snapovalov spaces,geodesic deviation}\n\n\\keywords{gravitation,cosmology,strong gravitational waves, perturbative gravitational waves}\n\n%\\maketitle must follow title, authors, abstract, and keywords\n\\maketitle\n\n% body of paper here - Use proper section commands\n% References should be done using the \\cite, \\ref, and \\label commands\n%\\section{}\n% Put \\label in argument of \\section for cross-referencing\n%\\section{\\label{}}\n%\\subsection{}\n%\\subsubsection{}\n\n% If in two-column mode, this environment will change to single-column\n% format so that long equations can be displayed. Use\n% sparingly.\n%\\begin{widetext}\n% put long equation here\n%\\end{widetext}\n\n% figures should be put into the text as floats.\n% Use the graphics or graphicx packages (distributed with LaTeX2e)\n% and the \\includegraphics macro defined in those packages.\n% See the LaTeX Graphics Companion by Michel Goosens, Sebastian Rahtz,\n% and Frank Mittelbach for instance.\n%\n% Here is an example of the general form of a figure:\n% Fill in the caption in the braces of the \\caption{} command. Put the label\n% that you will use with \\ref{} command in the braces of the \\label{} command.\n% Use the figure* environment if the figure should span across the\n% entire page. There is no need to do explicit centering.\n\n% \\begin{figure}\n% \\includegraphics{}%\n% \\caption{\\label{}}\n% \\end{figure}\n\n% Surround figure environment with turnpage environment for landscape\n% figure\n% \\begin{turnpage}\n% \\begin{figure}\n% \\includegraphics{}%\n% \\caption{\\label{}}\n% \\end{figure}\n% \\end{turnpage}\n\n% tables should appear as floats within the text\n%\n% Here is an example of the general form of a table:\n% Fill in the caption in the braces of the \\caption{} command. Put the label\n% that you will use with \\ref{} command in the braces of the \\label{} command.\n% Insert the column specifiers (l, r, c, d, etc.) in the empty braces of the\n% \\begin{tabular}{} command.\n% The ruledtabular enviroment adds doubled rules to table and sets a\n% reasonable default table settings.\n% Use the table* environment to get a full-width table in two-column\n% Add \\usepackage{longtable} and the longtable (or longtable*}\n% environment for nicely formatted long tables. Or use the the [H]\n% placement option to break a long table (with less control than \n% in longtable).\n% \\begin{table}%[H] add [H] placement to break table across pages\n% \\caption{\\label{}}\n% \\begin{ruledtabular}\n% \\begin{tabular}{}\n% Lines of table here ending with \\\\\n% \\end{tabular}\n% \\end{ruledtabular}\n% \\end{table}\n\n% Surround table environment with turnpage environment for landscape\n% table\n% \\begin{turnpage}\n% \\begin{table}\n% \\caption{\\label{}}\n% \\begin{ruledtabular}\n% \\begin{tabular}{}\n% \\end{tabular}\n% \\end{ruledtabular}\n% \\end{table}\n% \\end{turnpage}\n\n\\section{Introduction}\n\\label{sec1}\n\nA gravitational wave incident on a region containing stationary charges and currents causes the electromagnetic field of these charges and currents to vary with time. As a result, the vicinity of the stationary system of charges and currents generates electromagnetic radiation. This effect can be used as an alternative method for detecting gravitational waves. \nThe idea of \nusing \nthe generation \nof electromagnetic waves \nduring the interaction of a gravitational wave with a static electromagnetic field \nto detect gravitational waves was discussed long before the direct detection \nof gravitational waves in 2015. \nFor example, Papadopoulos and Esposito \\cite{Papadopoulos_1981} investigated the influence of a gravitational wave on the motion of a charged particle in a uniform magnetic field. Assuming a weak gravitational field, they found corresponding first-order corrections to the synchrotron radiation. \nMarklund at al~\\cite{Marklund_2000} propose a method for detecting gravitational waves based on their interaction with thin cosmic plasma.\n\nThe electromagnetic field of a charged particle in curved space has been intensively studied since the second half of the last century.\nThe problem of radiation from a freely falling charge and the related problem of radiation reaction have attracted particular attention. The interaction of a point charge with its own electromagnetic field has been the subject of numerous papers, beginning with Dirac's famous work \\cite{10.1098/rspa.1938.0124}.\nA review of these papers can be found in \\cite{Poisson_2011}.\nIn the now-classic works \\cite{DeWitt_1960, Hobbs_1968}, the Green's function for the wave equation in curved space was found.\nThis made it possible to obtain the Liénard-Wiechert potentials of a point charge in a generally covariant form.\nIt was shown that the electromagnetic field of a charge in curved space requires integrating the Green's function not only over the surface of the light cone past relative to the observer, but also over the whole past history of the charged particle. According to the authors, the curvature of space creates \"tails\" of the electromagnetic field within the observer's light cone.\n\n\nSome authors have investigated the field of a freely falling point charge in a weak gravitational wave. Corrections to Maxwell's equations in the gravitational wave metric were obtained in \\cite{Cabral2017GW,Cabral2017Astro,Cabral2017Found}. \nThe solution to Maxwell's equations for the field of a point charge is found either by the perturbation method \\cite{Sasaki_1978} or by expanding the electromagnetic field in spherical harmonics \\cite{Boughn_1975}. It was shown that a charge or dipole freely falling in a gravitational wave \\cite{Boughn_1975}, as well as a uniformly moving charge \\cite{Sasaki_1978}, generate electromagnetic radiation. An unpleasant surprise was that if the gravitational wave is unlimited in space and time, the electromagnetic radiation of a point charge has an infinitely large intensity \\cite{Boughn_1975, Sasaki_1978}. To avoid this, Sasaki and Sato \\cite{Sasaki_1978} limited the gravitational wave in the transverse direction to a normal Gaussian distribution, and in time to a cutoff factor of the type $\\text{exp}\\,(- \\epsilon |t|)$, where $\\epsilon$ is some constant, $t$ is time.\nThe divergence is avoided also if the charge is screened at some distance \\cite{Boughn_1975}.\n\nIn this paper, we consider the electromagnetic field of a point charge freely falling in the field of a gravitational wave.\nTo avoid divergence of the integrals and the infinite energy of the induced electromagnetic field, we assumed that the coordinate speed of light in the gravitational wave field is less than the speed of light in a vacuum (an effect similar to the Shapiro time delay \\cite{1964ShapiroPhRvL.13.789S}).\n%\nThe Shapiro effect refers to the coordinate speed of light, which for a distant observer turns out to be less than the speed of light in a vacuum due to gravitational time dilation.\n%\nThis assumption proved sufficient for the integrals of the Green's function to converge and the radiation intensity to be finite.\n\nThe paper is organized as follows. In Section \\ref{sec2}, Maxwell's equations for the field of a point charge freely falling in the field of a plane gravitational wave are solved using the perturbation method. The solutions are written as a volume integral of the effective current induced by the gravitational wave. In Section \\ref{sec3}, we considered the far-field field and found the angular distribution of the electromagnetic radiation induced by the gravitational wave. A discussion of the obtained results is presented in Section \\ref{secDiscussion}.\n\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n\\section{Maxwell's equations in a weak gravitational wave}\n\\label{sec2}\n\nWe seek the electromagnetic field potential of a point charge in a gravitational wave as a solution to Maxwell's equations. We assume the electromagnetic field is weak, so that it does not contribute to the stress-energy tensor. Then, from Einstein's equations, it follows that the Ricci tensor of a free gravitational wave is zero. Maxwell's equations for the potential $A^\\alpha$ in this case have the form\n\\begin{equation}\nA^{\\alpha ;\\beta}_{\\phantom{\\alpha ;};\\beta}=\\frac{4\\pi}{c}j^\\alpha,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $j^\\alpha$ is the current density, $c$ is the speed of light and semicolon denotes the covariant derivative.\nThe metric tensor of a weak gravitational wave can be represented as $g_{\\mu\\nu}= \\eta_{\\mu\\nu}+h_{\\mu\\nu}$, where $\\eta_{\\mu\\nu}=\\text{diag}\\, (1,-1,-1,-1)$ is the metric tensor of the Minkowski space. For a plane gravitational wave propagating along the coordinate axis $x^1$, the metric tensor is \\cite{Landau_II}\n\\begin{equation}\\label{gmunu}\ng_{\\mu\\nu}=\\left(\n\\begin{array}{cccc}\n1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n0 & 0 & h_{22}-1 & h_{23} \\\\\n0 & 0 & h_{32} & h_{33}-1 \\\\\n\\end{array}\n\\right),\n\\end{equation}\nwhere the perturbation of the metric depends only on the wave variable $x^0-x^1$\n\\[\nh_{\\mu\\nu}=h_{\\mu\\nu}(x^0-x^1)\\ll 1.\n\\]\nIn the transverse-traceless gauge (TT-gage) $h_{23}=h_{32},\\, h_{33}=-h_{22}$.\n\nWe assume that the electric charge is at rest with respect to the chosen coordinate system. The observer is also in the field of the gravitational wave, and, as we show in Appendix \\ref{Appen1}, it can also be at rest relative to the same coordinate system. In the sense that their spatial coordinates are independent of time. Though, the physical distance between the charge and the observer can obviously change in accordance with the metric of gravitational wave . \n\nThe Christoffel symbols, up to first order of small $h_{\\mu\\nu}$, are equal to\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Gamma^0_{\\sigma\\mu}=\\Gamma^1_{\\sigma\\mu}=-\\frac 12\n\\left(\\begin{array}{@{}c|c@{}}\n \\mbox{\\normalfont\\Large 0}\n & \\mbox{\\normalfont\\Large 0} \\\\\n\\hline\n \\mbox{\\normalfont\\Large 0} &\n \\begin{matrix}\n\\dot{h}_{22} & \\dot{h}_{23} \\\\\n%\\dot{h}_{22} & \\dot{h}_{23} \\\\\n\\dot{h}_{32} & \\dot{h}_{33} \n\\end{matrix}\n\\end{array}\\right),\n\\end{equation}\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Gamma^2_{\\sigma\\mu}=\\frac 12\n\\left(\\begin{array}{@{}c|c@{}}\n \\mbox{\\normalfont\\Large 0}\n & \\begin{matrix}\n -\\dot{h}_{22} & -\\dot{h}_{23} \\\\\n \\dot{h}_{22} & \\dot{h}_{23}\n \\end{matrix} \\\\\n\\hline\n \\begin{matrix}\n -\\dot{h}_{22} & \\dot{h}_{22} \\\\\n - \\dot{h}_{23} & \\dot{h}_{23}\n \\end{matrix} & \\mbox{\\normalfont\\Large 0}\n\\end{array}\\right),\n\\end{equation}\n%\n\\begin{equation}\n\\Gamma^3_{\\sigma\\mu}=\\frac 12\n\\left(\\begin{array}{@{}c|c@{}}\n \\mbox{\\normalfont\\Large 0}\n & \\begin{matrix}\n -\\dot{h}_{32} & -\\dot{h}_{33} \\\\\n \\dot{h}_{32} & \\dot{h}_{33}\n \\end{matrix} \\\\\n\\hline\n \\begin{matrix}\n -\\dot{h}_{32} & \\dot{h}_{32} \\\\\n - \\dot{h}_{33} & \\dot{h}_{33}\n \\end{matrix} & \\mbox{\\normalfont\\Large 0}\n\\end{array}\\right).\n\\end{equation}\n\n%The Christoffel symbols, up to first order of smallness in $h_{\\mu\\nu}$, are equal to\n%\\begin{equation}\n%\\Gamma^0_{\\sigma\\mu}=\\Gamma^1_{\\sigma\\mu}=-\\frac 12\n%\\begin{pmatrix}\n%\\begin{array}{@{}c|c@{}}\n% \\mbox{\\normalfont\\Large 0}\n% & \\mbox{\\normalfont\\Large 0} \\\\\n%\\hline\n% \\mbox{\\normalfont\\Large 0} &\n%\\begin{matrix}\n%\\dot{h}_{22} & \\dot{h}_{23} \\\\\n%\\dot{h}_{32} & \\dot{h}_{33} \n%\\end{matrix}\n%\\end{array}\n%\\end{pmatrix}\n%\\end{equation}\n%%\n%\\begin{equation}\n%\\Gamma^2_{\\sigma\\mu}=\\frac 12\n%\\begin{pmatrix}\n%\\begin{array}{@{}c|c@{}}\n% \\mbox{\\normalfont\\Large 0}\n% & \\begin{matrix}\n% -\\dot{h}_{22} & -\\dot{h}_{23} \\\\\n% \\dot{h}_{22} & \\dot{h}_{23}\n% \\end{matrix} \\\\\n%\\hline\n% \\begin{matrix}\n% -\\dot{h}_{22} & \\dot{h}_{22} \\\\\n% -\\dot{h}_{23} & \\dot{h}_{23}\n% \\end{matrix} & \\mbox{\\normalfont\\Large 0}\n%\\end{array}\n%\\end{pmatrix}\n%\\end{equation}\n%%\n%\\begin{equation}\n%\\Gamma^3_{\\sigma\\mu}=\\frac 12\n%\\begin{pmatrix}\n%\\begin{array}{@{}c|c@{}}\n% \\mbox{\\normalfont\\Large 0}\n% & \\begin{matrix}\n% -\\dot{h}_{32} & -\\dot{h}_{33} \\\\\n% \\dot{h}_{32} & \\dot{h}_{33}\n% \\end{matrix} \\\\\n%\\hline\n% \\begin{matrix}\n% -\\dot{h}_{32} & \\dot{h}_{32} \\\\\n% -\\dot{h}_{33} & \\dot{h}_{33}\n% \\end{matrix} & \\mbox{\\normalfont\\Large 0}\n%\\end{array}\n%\\end{pmatrix}\n%\\end{equation}\n\nThe dot denotes the derivative with respect to the wave variable $x^0-x^1$.\nLet us express the covariant derivative of $A^\\mu$ in terms of ordinary derivatives\n\\begin{equation}\nA^{\\alpha ;\\beta}_{\\phantom{\\alpha ;};\\beta}=A^{\\alpha ,\\beta}_{\\phantom{\\alpha ,},\\beta}+\\eta^{\\beta\\sigma}\\left(\\Gamma^\\alpha_{\\mu\\sigma,\\beta} A^\\mu -\\Gamma^\\nu_{\\sigma\\beta}A^\\alpha_{,\\nu}+2\\Gamma^\\alpha_{\\mu\\beta}A^\\mu_{,\\sigma}\\right).\n\\end{equation}\nThe second and third terms on the right-hand side vanish in the TT-gauge.\nTherefore, Maxwell's equations in ordinary derivatives are of the form\n\\begin{equation}\nA^{\\alpha ,\\beta}_{\\phantom{\\alpha ,},\\beta}+2\\eta^{\\beta\\sigma} \\Gamma^\\alpha_{\\mu\\beta}A^\\mu_{,\\sigma}=\\frac{4\\pi}{c}j^\\alpha.\n\\end{equation}\nThe solution of the geodesic equations for a particle in a gravitational wave (\\ref{gmunu}) shows that a freely falling charge remains at rest if it was at rest initially \\cite{Carroll_2004, Hobson_2006}. Therefore, the current density for a charge at rest at the origin is equal to\n\\begin{equation}\nj^0=\\frac{ec}{\\sqrt{-g}}\\delta(\\mbox{\\bf r}),\\quad j^k=0, \\quad k=1,2,3,\n\\end{equation}\n$e$ is the charge of the particle, $g$ is the determinant of the metric tensor, $\\delta(\\mbox{\\bf r})=\\delta(x^1)\\delta(x^2)\\delta(x^3)$. In the TT-gauge $\\sqrt{-g}=1$ up to the first-order in $h_{\\mu\\nu}$. Maxwell's equations in this approximation have the form\n\\begin{equation}\\label{max}\nA^{\\alpha ,\\beta}_{\\phantom{\\alpha ,},\\beta}+2\\eta^{\\beta\\sigma} \\Gamma^\\alpha_{\\mu\\beta}A^\\mu_{,\\sigma}=4\\pi e\\delta(\\boldfontmath r)\\delta_0^\\alpha\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\delta_0^\\alpha$ is the Kronecker delta.\n\nLet us represent the potential $A^\\alpha$ as a sum\n\\begin{equation}\\label{sum}\nA^\\alpha={\\bar A^\\alpha}+\\tilde A^\\alpha,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere the potential $\\bar A^\\alpha$ is the solution of Maxwell's equations in flat space\n\\[\n\\eta^{\\beta\\gamma}\\bar A^\\alpha_{,\\beta\\gamma}=4\\pi e\\delta(\\boldfontmath r)\\delta_0^\\alpha.\n\\]\nand is equal to the potential of a point-like charge\n\\begin{equation}\\label{barA}\n\\bar A^\\alpha=\\frac{e}{r}\\delta^\\alpha_0, \\quad r=\\sqrt{-x^i x_i}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nThe potential $\\tilde A^\\alpha$ describes the disturbance of the electromagnetic field caused by a gravitational wave and it is of order $h_{\\mu\\nu}$ relative to $\\bar A^\\alpha$.\nSubstituting (\\ref{sum}) into (\\ref{max}) and retaining only first-order terms, we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\\label{max1}\n\\tilde A^{\\alpha ,\\beta}_{\\phantom{\\alpha ,},\\beta}-h^{\\beta\\gamma}\\bar A^\\alpha_{,\\beta\\gamma}+2\\eta^{\\beta\\sigma} \\Gamma^\\alpha_{\\mu\\beta}\\bar A^\\mu_{,\\sigma}=0.\n\\end{equation}\nNext we introduce a fictitious current density\n\\begin{equation}\\label{J}\nJ^\\alpha=\\frac{c}{4\\pi} \\left(h^{\\beta\\gamma}\\bar A^\\alpha_{,\\beta\\gamma} -2\\eta^{\\beta\\sigma}\\Gamma^\\alpha_{\\mu\\beta}\\bar A^\\mu_{,\\sigma}\\right).\n\\end{equation}\nThen equation (\\ref{max1}) takes the form\n\\begin{equation}\\label{tilA}\n\\tilde A^{\\alpha ,\\beta}_{\\phantom{\\alpha ,},\\beta}=\\frac{4\\pi}{c}J^\\alpha.\n\\end{equation}\n\nEquation (\\ref{tilA}) defines the perturbation of the field $\\tilde A^\\alpha$ at an arbitrary point in spacetime $x^\\nu$. The source of the perturbation field is the current $J^\\alpha$, distributed in space. The perturbation arises because the constant Coulomb field of the charge becomes variable under the influence of the gravitational field. As a result, each point in space becomes a source of a secondary field $\\tilde A^\\alpha$.\nThe current density (\\ref{J}) is a known function of coordinates and time.\n\nThe solution to equation (\\ref{tilA}) can be expressed in terms of the retarded Green's function. The potential $\\tilde A^\\alpha$ at point $\\boldfontmath r$ at time $t$ is equal to\n\\begin{equation}\\label{tilA1}\n\\boldfontmath{\\tilde A^\\alpha} (\\boldfontmath r, t)=\\frac 1c \\int\\frac{J^\\alpha(t', \\boldfontmath r')}{R}{\\rm d}^3\\boldfontmath{r'},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $t'$ is the retarded time, $\\boldfontmath R=\\boldfontmath r-\\boldfontmath{ r'}$.\n\nEquation (\\ref{tilA}), obtained to first-order accuracy in $h_{ik}$, tells us that $ct'=ct-R$. But, strictly speaking, $t-t'$ must be calculated as the time it takes for light to travel along the null geodesic between points with coordinates $\\boldfontmath r$ and $\\boldfontmath r'$ \\cite{Osetrin_2024}. This time can be found, for example, by integrating the equation\n\\[\ng_{\\mu\\nu}{\\rm d}x^\\mu{\\rm d}x^\\nu=0.\n\\]\nOr\n\\[\n{\\rm d}{x^0}^2 ={\\rm d}l^2-h_{22}\\left({\\rm d}{x^2}^2-{\\rm d}{x^3}^2\\right)-2h_{23}{\\rm d}x^2{\\rm d}x^3,\n\\]\nwhere ${\\rm d}l^2={\\rm d}{x^1}^2+{\\rm d}{x^2}^2+{\\rm d}{x^3}^2$. Let $\\boldfontmath n$ denote the three-dimensional unit vector tangent to the desired geodesic. Then the last equation, up to first order in $h_{ik}$, can be written as\n\\begin{equation}\nc{\\rm d}t= [1-\\frac 12 h_{22}(n_y^2-n_z^2)-h_{23}n_yn_z]{\\rm d}l.\n\\end{equation}\nHere, the vector $\\boldfontmath n$ can be considered constant in the same approximation. Hence\n\\begin{equation}\nc(t-t')=R-\\frac 12\\int\\limits_{\\boldfontmath r' }^{\\boldfontmath r}[ h_{22}(n_y^2-n_z^2)+2h_{23}n_yn_z]{\\rm d}l.\n\\end{equation}\nLet us define the average coordinate velocity of propagation of an electromagnetic wave as $v$, equal to\n\\[\nv=\\frac{R}{t-t'}\\approx c\\left(1+\\frac{1}{2R}\\int\\limits_{\\boldfontmath r' }^{\\boldfontmath r}[ h_{22}(n_y^2-n_z^2)+2h_{23}n_yn_z]{\\rm d}l \\right).\n\\]\nHere $h_{ik}$ are periodic alternating functions, so the last integral has a magnitude of the order of $h_{ik}$. It does not contribute to $v$, since radiation is understood as a field that remains in the limit $R\\to \\infty$.\nTherefore, in the linear approximation, $v\\approx c$.\n\nHowever, in second-order perturbation theory, the integrand would contain functions of the type $h_{ik}^2$, which would introduce a linearly increasing terms into the integration result, i.e. terms proportional to $R$. Then, the difference $v$ from $c$ as $R\\to \\infty$ will be finite and proportional to $h_{ik}^2$.\nThus, the average coordinate velocity of light $v$ in a gravitational wave field differs from $c$ by corrections of the second (or higher) order in $h_{ik}$.\n\\begin{equation}\nv=c-\\mathcal{O}(h^2).\n\\end{equation}\n\nThe parameter $v$ is related to the delay of the electromagnetic signal in a gravitational field, known as the Shapiro time delay.\nThe difference between $v$ and $c$ is critical. If $v=c$, then the gravitational wave carries with it the electromagnetic field it generates.\nAs a result, the density of electromagnetic field energy on a fixed phase surface of a gravitational wave can increase as the wave propagates,\nwhich, as we will see below, can lead to an infinite density of electromagnetic field energy.\n\nMeanwhile, as early as 1923, Hadamard demonstrated \\cite{Hadamard_1923} that the sharp peak of electromagnetic radiation gradually spreads out as the radiation propagates in a gravitational field.\nWe also refer to the paper \\cite{balakin2001}, which shows that when an electromagnetic field propagates in the field of a gravitational wave, an effect similar to Cherenkov radiation occurs.\n\nBased on these physical considerations, we will henceforth assume that $v\\neq c$, setting $v=c$ where this is not critical. Nothing prevents us from setting $v=c$ everywhere in the obtained results at any time.\n\nLet's find the explicit form of the current density $J^\\alpha$. Substituting the Christoffel symbols into (\\ref{J}), we obtain for the current density\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{Jful}\nJ^\\alpha=-\\frac{c}{4\\pi}\\left(\n\\begin{array}{c}\nh_{22}({\\bar A}^0_{,33}-{\\bar A}^0_{,22})-2h_{23}{\\bar A}^0_{,23}\\\\\n0\\\\\n\\dot{h}_{22}{\\bar{A}}^0_{,2}+ \\dot{h}_{23}\\bar A^0_{,3} \\\\\n\\dot{h}_{32}{\\bar A}^0_{,2}+ \\dot{h}_{33}{\\bar A}^0_{,3}\n\\end{array}\n\\right),\n\\end{equation}\n\nWe place the origin of coordinates at the point where the charge is located, as shown in Fig. \\ref{sc12}.\n\\begin{figure}[ht]\\center\n\\includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{Coordinate-2-1.eps}\n\\caption{Charge $e$ is at the origin of the coordinate system. Vector $\\boldfontmath r$ indicates the point at which the field is calculated. Integration is performed over coordinates $\\boldfontmath r'$.}\n\\label{sc12}\n\\end{figure}\nWe calculate the potential $\\tilde A^\\alpha$ at the point with radius vector $\\boldfontmath r$; the integration variables over the volume are coordinates $\\boldfontmath r'=(x',y',z')$.\nSubstituting the derivatives of the potential $\\bar{\\boldfontmath A}$ (\\ref{barA}) into (\\ref{Jful}) and taking into account that $h_{23}= h_{32}$, $h_{33}=- h_{22}$, we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\n\\label{Jful-1}\nJ^\\alpha(t,\\boldfontmath r')=\\frac{ce}{4\\pi {r'}^5}\\left(\n\\begin{array}{c}\n3h_{22}({y'}^2-{z'}^2)+6h_{23} {y'}z'\\\\\n0\\\\\n{r'}^2(y'\\,\\dot{h}_{22}+ z'\\,\\dot{h}_{23}) \\\\\n{r'}^2(y' \\,\\dot{h}_{23}- z'\\,\\dot{h}_{22})\n\\end{array}\n\\right).\n\\end{equation}\nIt is easy to verify that this vector satisfies the continuity equation\n\\[\n\\partial_\\alpha J^\\alpha=0.\n\\]\nThus, the potential $\\tilde A^\\alpha$ is determined by the integrals\n\\begin{align}\n\\label{Aff0}\n\\tilde A^0 (\\boldfontmath r, t)=&\\frac{e}{4\\pi}\\int\\frac{3h_{22}({y'}^2-{z'}^2)+6h_{23} {y'}z}{Rr'^5}{\\rm d}^3\\boldfontmath{r'} ,\\\\\n\\tilde A^1 (\\boldfontmath r, t)=&0 ,\\\\\n\\tilde A^2 (\\boldfontmath r, t)=&\\frac{e}{4\\pi}\\int\\frac{y'\\,\\dot{h}_{22}+ z'\\,\\dot{h}_{23}}{Rr'^3}{\\rm d}^3\\boldfontmath{r'},\\\\\n\\tilde A^3 (\\boldfontmath r, t)=&\\frac{e}{4\\pi}\\int\\frac{y' \\,\\dot{h}_{23}- z'\\,\\dot{h}_{22}}{Rr'^3}{\\rm d}^3\\boldfontmath{r'}.\n\\label{Aff3}\n\\end{align}\nWhere\n\\begin{align}\nh_{ik}=&h_{ik}(ct-R/\\beta-x') ,\\quad \\beta=v/c, \\nonumber \\\\\nr'=&\\sqrt{{x'}^2+{y'}^2+{z'}^2},\\nonumber \\\\\nR=&\\sqrt{(x-x')^2+(y-y')^2+(z-z')^2}.\\nonumber \n\\end{align}\nThis is solution in quadratures to Maxwell's equation for the field of a point-like charge in the metric of weak gravitational wave.\n\n\\section{Far-field approximation}\n\\label{sec3}\n\nLet's find the potential $\\tilde A^\\alpha$ far from the charge.\nObviously, far from the charge there is an electromagnetic field that decreases as $1/r$ and represents the radiation induced by the gravitational wave.\n\nThe current (\\ref{Jful-1}) decreases as $1/{r'}^2$ with distance from the charge, so the main contribution to the integrals (\\ref{Aff0}) -- (\\ref{Aff3}) comes from the current in the vicinity of the charge. We set $r\\gg r'$ and expand $R$ in powers of $r'/r$.\n\\begin{equation}\nR\\approx r-\\boldfontmath n\\boldfontmath{r'}, \\quad \\boldfontmath n=\\boldfontmath r/r.\n\\end{equation}\nThe small term $\\boldfontmath n\\boldfontmath{r'}$ must be included in the retarded time, while in the denominator of equations (\\ref{Aff0}) -- (\\ref{Aff3}) we can set $R=r$ and factor $r$ outside the integral sign.\nIn the linearized theory of gravity, an arbitrary plane gravitational wave can be represented as a superposition of monochromatic waves. Let us calculate the integrals (\\ref{Aff0}) -- (\\ref{Aff3}) for a monochromatic plane wave of arbitrary polarization\n\\begin{equation}\\label{wave}\nh_{ij}(\\boldfontmath r',t')=\\left(\n\\begin{array}{cc}\n-a \\cos k(ct' - x') & b\\sin k(ct' - x') \\\\\nb\\sin k(ct' - x')&a\\cos k(ct' - x') \\\\\n\\end{array}\n\\right) , \\quad i,j=2,3,\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $a,b\\ll 1$ and $k$ are some constants,\n\\begin{equation}\nct'-x'=ct-\\frac{ r-\\boldfontmath n\\boldfontmath{r'}}{\\beta}-x'.\n\\end{equation}\n\nFigure \\ref{vecJab} shows the spatial distribution of the vector $\\boldfontmath J=(0,J_y,J_z)$ and its change with time for a circularly polarized gravitational wave $a=b$.\n\\begin{figure}[ht]\\center\n\\includegraphics[width=5.1cm]{J_a=b_t=0.eps}\\,\n\\includegraphics[width=5.1cm]{J_a=b_t=pi4.eps}\\,\n\\includegraphics[width=5.1cm]{J_a=b_t=pi2.eps}\n\\caption{The field of the vector $\\boldfontmath J=(J_y,J_z)$ in a gravitational wave with circular polarization $a=b$. From left to right, $k(ct' - x')$ is equal to $0,\\,\\pi/4,\\,\\pi/2$. At each point, the vector $\\boldfontmath J$ rotates with angular velocity $\\omega$ without changing its magnitude.}\n\\label{vecJab}\n\\end{figure}\n\nThe dependence of the vector $\\boldfontmath J$ on time for linearly polarized gravitational waves is shown in Fig. \\ref{vecJb}. The vector $\\boldfontmath J$ vanishes every quarter period.\n\\begin{figure}[ht]\\center\n\\includegraphics[width=5.1cm]{J_a=0_t=0.eps}\\,\n\\includegraphics[width=5.1cm]{J_a=0_t=pi4.eps}\\,\n\\includegraphics[width=5.1cm]{J_a=0_t=pi2.eps}\n\\caption{The field of the vector $\\boldfontmath J=(J_y,J_z)$ for linear polarization of the gravitational wave $a=0$. From left to right, $k(ct' - x')$ is $0,\\,\\pi/4,\\,\\pi/2$. The vector $\\boldfontmath J$ oscillates without changing its direction.}\n\\label{vecJb}\n\\end{figure}\n\nWe write the result of integration (\\ref{Aff0}) -- (\\ref{Aff3}) in the spherical coordinate system $r,\\theta,\\phi$. The polar angle $\\theta$ is measured from the $x$-axis, and the azimuthal angle $\\phi$ is measured from the $y$-axis, so the radius vector of the observation point is $\\boldfontmath r=(x,y,z)=r(\\cos\\theta,\\sin\\theta\\cos\\phi, \\sin\\theta\\sin\\phi)$.\nDetails of the calculations are given in the Appendix \\ref{Appen2}. As a result of integration, we obtain the vector potential of the perturbation field\n\\begin{align}\\label{K4}\n\\tilde A^0 (\\boldfontmath r, t)=&\\frac{e\\sin^2\\theta}{r kQ} [a\\cos 2\\phi\\cos kct_1-b \\sin 2\\phi\\sin kct_1],\\\\\n\\tilde A^1 (\\boldfontmath r, t)=&0,\\\\\n\\tilde A^2 (\\boldfontmath r, t)=&\\frac{e\\beta\\sin\\theta}{rkQ} [a\\cos\\phi\\cos kct_1-b \\sin\\phi\\sin kct_1],\\\\\n\\tilde A^3 (\\boldfontmath r, t)=&-\\frac{e\\beta\\sin\\theta}{rk Q} [a \\sin\\phi\\cos kct_1+b\\cos\\phi\\sin kct_1].\n\\end{align}\nHere\n\\begin{equation}\nQ=1-2\\beta\\cos\\theta+\\beta^2, \\quad t_1=t-r/v.\n\\end{equation}\nThis potential satisfies the Lorentz gauge\n\\begin{equation}\n\\partial_\\nu \\tilde A^\\nu =0.\n\\end{equation}\n\nUsing the electromagnetic field tensor $F_{\\mu\\nu}=\\partial_\\mu A_\\nu-\\partial_\\nu A_\\mu$, we find the three-dimensional vectors of the electric $\\boldfontmath E$ and magnetic $\\boldfontmath B$ fields\n\\begin{equation}\nE^i=-F^{0i},\\quad B^i=-\\frac 12\\epsilon^{ijk}F_{jk},\n\\end{equation}\nwhere $\\epsilon^{ijk}$ is the completely antisymmetric unit tensor. We write the result in a spherical coordinate system\n\\begin{align}\nE_r=&-\\frac{e\\sin^2\\theta}{rQ\\beta}(1-\\beta^2)(a\\sin kct_1\\cos 2\\phi+b\\cos kct_1\\sin 2\\phi) ,\\\\\nE_\\theta=& \\frac{e\\beta\\sin\\theta\\cos\\theta}{rQ} (a\\sin kct_1\\cos 2\\phi+b\\cos kct_1\\sin 2\\phi) ,\\\\\nE_\\phi=&\\frac{e\\beta\\sin\\theta}{rQ}(-a\\sin kct_1\\sin 2\\phi+b\\cos kct_1\\cos 2\\phi),\\\\\nB_r=&0,\\\\\nB_\\theta=&\\frac{e\\sin\\theta}{rQ}(a\\sin kct_1\\sin 2\\phi-b\\cos kct_1\\cos 2\\phi), \\\\\nB_\\phi=&\\frac{e\\sin\\theta\\cos\\theta}{rQ} (a\\sin kct_1\\cos 2\\phi+b\\cos kct_1\\sin 2\\phi).\n\\end{align}\nWe have neglected the terms decreasing as $1/r^2$.\n\nThis field coincides with the electromagnetic field of a plane wave in a dielectric medium with a refractive index of $n$:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\boldfontmath B=n(\\boldfontmath{\\hat r}\\times \\boldfontmath E), \\quad \\boldfontmath{\\hat r}=\\boldfontmath r/r.\n\\end{equation}\nThe refractive index here is represented by $n=1/\\beta$. This is a direct consequence of our adoption of the coordinate velocity of propagation of an electromagnetic wave in a gravitational field as $v=c\\beta$. This result is consistent with the fact that Maxwell's equations in a gravitational field can be represented as equations for the electromagnetic field in a dielectric medium~\\cite{Landau_II}. This analogy, first noted by V. Gordon in 1923 \\cite{gordon1923}, allows us to formally reduce the problem of light propagation in curved spacetime to the problem of wave propagation in a flat space filled with a medium with variable permittivity and magnetic permeability \\cite{erkul2026}. The interpretation of the gravitational field as an optical medium in flat spacetime has been further developed and has found wide application \\cite{ehlers1993, plebanski1960, chen2008, chen2009, Ruggiero_2025}.\n\nThe difference between $\\beta$ and unity is significant only in the expression for $Q$. In other parts of the equations for $\\boldfontmath E$, we can set $\\beta=1$. Then $\\boldfontmath E$ and $\\boldfontmath B$ are mutually orthogonal and orthogonal to the direction of radiation. The radiation frequency coincides with the gravitational wave frequency. The radiation is elliptically polarized.\n\nThe radiation intensity per unit solid angle $\\Omega$ is determined by the expression\n\\begin{equation}\n\\frac{{\\rm d}I}{{\\rm d}\\Omega}=\\frac{cr^2}{4\\pi}E^2.\n\\end{equation}\nKeeping polarization in mind, we represent the vector $\\boldfontmath E$ through its $y$- and $z$-components. The angular distribution of the $y$- and $z$-polarization components averaged over time has the form\n\\begin{align}\\label{anglov1}\n\\frac{dI_y}{d\\Omega}=&\\frac{ce^2\\sin^2\\theta}{8\\pi Q^2}[a^2\\sin^2\\phi(1+\\sin^2\\theta\\cos 2\\phi)^2+\nb^2\\cos^2\\phi(\\cos^2\\theta +\\sin^2\\theta\\cos 2\\phi)^2] ,\\\\\n\\label{anglov2}\n\\frac{dI_z}{d\\Omega}=&\\frac{ce^2\\sin^2\\theta}{8\\pi Q^2}[a^2\\cos^2\\phi(1-\\sin^2\\theta\\cos 2\\phi)^2+\nb^2\\sin^2\\phi(\\cos^2\\theta -\\sin^2\\theta\\cos 2\\phi)^2].\n\\end{align}\nOne can see that the angular distribution of the $y$- and $z$-polarization components differs from each other by rotation by an angle of $\\pi/2$ around the $x$-axis.\n\nThe total radiation intensity is equal to\n\\begin{equation}\\label{Fful}\n\\frac{dI}{d\\Omega}=\\frac{ce^2\\sin^2\\theta}{8\\pi Q^2}\\big[a^2(1-\\sin^2\\theta\\cos^2 2\\phi)+b^2(1-\\sin^2\\theta\\sin^2 2\\phi)\\big].\n\\end{equation}\n%The proximity of $\\beta$ to unity in the formula $Q=1-2\\beta\\cos\\theta+\\beta^2$ leads to the fact that the main part of the radiation is concentrated in a narrow cone with an angular aperture of the order of $\\Delta\\theta\\sim 1-\\beta$.\nSince $\\beta\\approx 1$, the $Q$ factor in the denominator of equations (\\ref{anglov1})-(\\ref{Fful}) causes the radiation to be concentrated in a narrow cone with an angular aperture of order of $\\Delta\\theta\\sim 1-\\beta$.\nThe radiation pattern of the $y$-polarization component for different values of the amplitudes $a$ and $b$ of the gravitational wave is shown in Fig. \\ref{sc1}.\n\\begin{figure}[ht]\\center\n\\includegraphics[width=5cm]{b=1_a=1.eps}\n\\includegraphics[width=5cm]{b=1_a=0.eps}\n\\includegraphics[width=5cm]{b=0_a=1.eps}\n\\caption{Angular distribution of the $y$-component of radiation. Left: $a=b$, center: $a=0$, right: $b=0$.}\n\\label{sc1}\n\\end{figure}\n\nSince $\\beta$ is close to unity, it makes sense to expand the angular distribution of the radiation into small quantities $\\epsilon=1-\\beta$ and $\\theta$.\nIntroducing the reduced angles\n\\[\n\\psi=\\theta/\\epsilon, \\quad \\psi_y=\\psi\\cos\\phi, \\quad \\psi_z=\\psi\\sin\\phi,\n\\]\nwe rewrite the radiation intensity of the polarization components in the form\n\\begin{align}\n\\frac{dI_y}{d\\Omega}=&\\frac{ce^2}{8\\pi\\epsilon^2(1+\\psi^2)^2}(a^2\\psi_z^2+b^2\\psi_y^2) ,\\\\\n\\frac{dI_z}{d\\Omega}=&\\frac{ce^2}{8\\pi\\epsilon^2(1+\\psi^2)^2}(a^2\\psi_y^2+b^2\\psi_z^2).\n\\end{align}\nNow the shape of the angular distribution is completely independent of $\\beta$.\nThe value of $\\beta$ only affects the scale factor $\\epsilon$ in the denominator.\n\nThe angular distribution (\\ref{Fful}) resembles the corresponding angular distribution of electromagnetic radiation in \\cite{Sasaki_1978}. The difference is due to the fact that the gravitational wave in \\cite{Sasaki_1978} is limited in space and time by appropriate cutoff factors, which eliminate the divergence at $\\theta=\\pi$.\n\n \n\\section{Discussion}\n\\label{secDiscussion}\nOne of the main problems the authors encounter when studying the interaction of gravitational waves with the electromagnetic field of a point charge is that the energy density of electromagnetic radiation diverges in the direction of propagation of the gravitational wave \\cite{Sasaki_1978, Boughn_1975}. Two possible reasons for this divergence can be identified.\n\nOne is related to the traditional problem: the field of a point-like charged particle diverges at the position of the particle. The induced electromagnetic radiation field is proportional to the originally stationary electromagnetic field (${\\bar A}^0$ in our notation). This could lead to infinitely large energy of radiation. To eliminate this divergence, one can somehow isolate the field’s singular part, or this divergence can be removed by mass renormalization. A review of such procedures can be found in \\cite{Poisson_2011}.\n\nAnother reason for the infinite energy density of electromagnetic radiation \n%in the direction of gravitational wave propagation\n may lie in the assumption that the coordinate velocity of electromagnetic radiation in a gravitational wave coincides with the speed of light in a vacuum. In this case, the energy of electromagnetic radiation excited by a gravitational wave is transported along with the gravitational wave, accumulating over time on a specific phase surface of the gravitational wave.\nMore precisely, this applies only to electromagnetic radiation propagating in the same direction as the gravitational wave. Electromagnetic radiation propagating in other directions gradually lags behind the phase surface of the gravitational wave on which it originated.\n\nTo avoid these divergences, Sasaki and Sato \\cite{Sasaki_1978} constrained the gravitational wave in the transverse direction to a Gaussian distribution and multiplied the vector potential of the induced electromagnetic field by a specially designed regularization factor. Boughn \\cite{Boughn_1975} also concludes that an infinitely extended gravitational wave, interacting with the field of a point charge, generates electromagnetic radiation of infinite power. The author claims that this divergence is avoided if either the charge is screened at some distance or the gravitational wave is in the form of a wave packet of finite dimension.\n\nWe propose what we believe is a more natural way to avoid divergences in calculating the electromagnetic field induced by the interaction of a gravitational wave with the field of a point charge. Based on physical considerations detailed in the text between equations (\\ref{tilA1}) and (\\ref{Jful}), we assume that the average coordinate velocity of light propagation in a gravitational wave (denoted above by $v$) is less than the speed of light in a vacuum. \nIt turns out, that this is sufficient to obtain finite expressions for the induced field and the intensity of the induced radiation. However, within the first-order perturbation theory used in this article, we cannot find a difference between $v$ and the speed of light in a vacuum. Thus, $v$ is an external parameter that must be calculated using more accurate methods. %Alternatively, remaining within the first-order perturbation theory, we must set v = c.\n\n\n\n\\section{Conclusion}\n\\label{secConclusion}\nWe have found the electromagnetic field of a point charge at rest in a gravitational wave. The motivation for this work lies primarily in purely academic interest and, secondly, in exploring the possibility of detecting gravitational waves using the electromagnetic radiation they induce. We have shown that the assumption that the coordinate speed of light in gravitational wave is less than the speed of light in vacuum is sufficient to avoid divergences in calculating the potential of induced electromagnetic field.\n\nAs a result, we obtained the angular distribution and polarization of electromagnetic radiation induced by a weak gravitational wave incident on a charged particle. This information will enable targeted searches and detection of gravitational waves.\n%\\begin{itemize}\n%\n%\\item Relevance (brief): We studied [problem] to solve [problem].\n%\n%\\item Results: As a result, we obtained: a) ..., b) ..., c) ....\n%\n%\\item Significance: This is important because it allows [application].\n%\n%\\item Limitations: Our findings are valid subject to [limitation].\n%\n%\\item Future: In future work, we plan to expand [something] and apply it to [something].\n%\n%\\item Conclusion: Thus, this work contributes to [field] and opens new possibilities for [development].\n%\n%\\end{itemize}\n%In conclusion, we briefly discuss the possibility of using gravitational wave-induced electromagnetic radiation to detect gravitational waves.\nEarly studies in this area \\cite{Sasaki_1978, Boughn_1975} were very pessimistic about the possibility of using secondary electromagnetic waves in gravitational wave astronomy. However, more optimistic estimates have emerged in recent papers. For example, the authors of \\cite{Marklund_2000, Cabral2017GW} believe that gravitational wave-induced electromagnetic radiation in the radio range can be detected by modern very-long-baseline radio interferometers.\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\n\n% Specify following sections are appendices. Use \\appendix* if there\n% only one appendix.\n%\\appendix\n%\\section{}\n\\appendix\n\\section{Can two particles be at rest in a gravitational wave?}\\label{Appen1}\n%%\n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\nShort answer is: yes, if they are initially at rest relative to each other in the chosen coordinate system. We will show this below.\n\nThe geodesic equation for a nonrelativistic particle in coordinate time \\(t\\) reads:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\frac{d^2 x^i}{dt^2} + \\Gamma^{i}_{jk} \\frac{dx^j}{dt} \\frac{dx^k}{dt} = 0. \\label{eq:geodesic}\n\\end{equation}\n%\\subsection{The Role of Initial Velocity}\n%Let's consider a single particle.\n Let the coordinates and velocities of a particle at the moment $t=0$ be \n\\begin{equation}\nx^i(0) = X^i, \\qquad v^i(0) = \\frac{dx^i}{dt}\\bigg|_{t=0} = V^i.\n\\end{equation}\nSubstituting this into equation (\\ref{eq:geodesic}) at $t=0$, we have:\n\\begin{equation}\n\\left.\\frac{d^2 x^i}{dt^2}\\right|_{t=0} = - \\Gamma^{i}_{jk}\\big|_{t=0} \\cdot V^j V^k.\n\\end{equation}\n%\\textbf{Key observation:}\nIf \\(V^i = 0\\) (the particle is initially at rest), then \\(\\ddot{x}^i(0)=0\\).\nMoreover, taking derivative of the equation\n (\\ref{eq:geodesic}) with respect to time and substituting\nzero velocity, we can show that all derivatives of the velocity vanish.\nTherefore:\n\\begin{equation}\nV^i = 0 \\quad\\Rightarrow\\quad \\frac{dx^i}{dt}(t) \\equiv 0 \\quad\\Rightarrow\\quad x^i(t) \\equiv X^i = \\text{const}.\n\\end{equation}\n\nIf \\(V^i \\neq 0\\), then in general \\(\\ddot{x}^i(0) \\neq 0\\) \n%(unless \\(\\Gamma^{i}_{jk} V^j V^k = 0\\) — which is unlikely for an arbitrary wave),\nand the particle coordinates will change.\n%\\subsection{Two Different Particles}\n\nNow let there be two particles \\(A\\) and \\(B\\) with the initial conditions:\n\\begin{align}\nx_A^i(0) &= X_A^i, \\quad v_A^i(0) = V_A^i,\\\\\nx_B^i(0) &= X_B^i, \\quad v_B^i(0) = V_B^i.\n\\end{align}\nFor both particles to have constant coordinates, it is necessary and sufficient that:\n\\begin{equation}\nV_A^i = 0 \\quad \\text{and}\\quad V_B^i = 0.\n\\end{equation}\nIf \\(V_A^i = 0\\), but \\(V_B^i \\neq 0\\), then:\n\\begin{itemize}\n\\item The coordinates of particle \\(A\\) are constant.\n\\item The coordinates of particle \\(B\\) will change.\n\\end{itemize}\nNo coordinates transformation can simultaneously make the coordinates\nof both particles constant if their initial velocities in the original coordinate frame are different,\nbecause this would require the two different world lines to be coordinately fixed, which is impossible with non-zero relative motion.\n\n\\section{Calculating the Vector Potential}\\label{Appen2}\nLet's calculate the integral (\\ref{Aff0}). We define the vector $\\boldfontmath r'$ in the cylindrical coordinate system $(\\rho',\\phi', x')$, and we define the direction of the vector $\\boldfontmath n$ by the angles of the spherical coordinate system $\\theta,\\, \\phi$.\n\\[\n{y'}^2+{z'}^2=\\rho^2,\\quad y'=\\rho'\\cos\\phi', \\quad z'=\\rho'\\sin\\phi'.\n\\]\n\\[\n{\\rm d}^3r'=\\rho'{\\rm d}\\rho'{\\rm d}\\phi'{\\rm d}x', \\quad \\boldfontmath n=(\\cos\\theta,\\, \\sin\\theta\\cos\\phi, \\, \\sin\\theta\\sin\\phi) .\n\\]\nLet's find the potential $\\tilde A^0 (\\boldfontmath r, t)$\n\\begin{equation}\\label{K2}\n\\tilde A^0 (\\boldfontmath r, t)=\\frac{3e}{4\\pi rk} \\iint \\frac{{\\rho'}^3{\\rm d}\\rho'{\\rm d}x'}{{r'}^5}\\int [-a\\cos 2\\phi'\\cos(k\\tau) + b\\sin 2\\phi'\\sin(k\\tau)]{\\rm d}\\phi',\n\\end{equation}\nWhere\n\\begin{equation}\n\\tau = ct_1 + \\frac{1}{\\beta}[\\rho'\\sin\\theta\\cos(\\phi' - \\phi) + x'(\\cos\\theta- \\beta)], \\quad t_1=t-r/v.\n\\end{equation}\nAs a result of integration over $\\phi'$, we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\\label{K2}\n\\tilde A^0 (\\boldfontmath r, t)=\\frac{3e}{2 rk} \\iint \\frac{{\\rho'}^3{\\rm d}\\rho'{\\rm d}x'}{{r'}^5}[a\\cos 2\\phi \\cos F-b\\sin 2\\phi\\sin F]J_2(\\kappa\\rho').\n\\end{equation}\nHere\n\\begin{equation}\nF = kct_1 + \\frac{k}{\\beta}x'(\\cos\\theta - \\beta), \\quad \\kappa=\\frac{k\\sin\\theta}{\\beta} ,\n\\end{equation}\n$J_2(\\kappa\\rho')$ is the Bessel function of the first kind. When integrating over $\\rho'$, we use the integral\n\\begin{equation}\\label{IKK}\n\\int\\limits _0^\\infty J_2(\\kappa\\rho')\\frac{{\\rho'}^3{\\rm d}\\rho'}{({x'}^2+{\\rho'}^2)^{5/2}}=\\frac{\\kappa}{3}e^{-\\kappa |x'|},\n\\end{equation}\nAs a result, we obtain\n\\begin{equation}\\label{K22}\n\\tilde A^0 (\\boldfontmath r, t)=\\frac{e\\kappa}{2 rk} \\int\\limits_{-\\infty}^\\infty e^{-\\kappa |x'|}[a\\cos 2\\phi \\cos F-b\\sin 2\\phi\\sin F]{\\rm d}x'.\n\\end{equation}\nFinally, integrating over $x'$, we obtain the result\n\\begin{equation}\\label{K4}\n\\tilde A^0 (\\boldfontmath r, t)=\\frac{e\\sin^2\\theta}{r k(1-2\\beta\\cos\\theta+\\beta^2)} [a\\cos 2\\phi\\cos kct_1-b \\sin 2\\phi\\sin kct_1].\n\\end{equation}\n$\\tilde A^2$ and $\\tilde A^3$ are calculated similarly.\n\n%\\begin{widetext}\n%\\appendix\n\n%\\newpage\n\n%\\section{Tidal accelerations of a gravitational wave in a privileged coordinate system \n%}\n%\\label{AppendixA}\n\n%\\end{widetext}\n\n%\\newpage\n\n%\\begin{acknowledgments}\n%\n%The authors thank Gary~W.~Gibbons and Ilya~L.~Shapiro for helpful discussions on topics related to this~work.\n%\n%The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, \n% grant {No.~22-21-00265},\n%\\url{https://rscf.ru/en/project/22-21-00265/}\n%\n%\\end{acknowledgments}\n\n% If you have acknowledgments, this puts in the proper section head.\n%\\begin{acknowledgments}\n% put your acknowledgments here.\n%\\end{acknowledgments}\n\n\n% Create the reference section using BibTeX:\n%\\bibliography{basename of .bib file}\n\n%\\bibliography{OsetrinListOfCitedPublications-12-10-2022}\n\n%\\bibliography{OsetrinListOfCitedPublications-22-02-2022,OsetrinListOfCitedPublications-03-10-2025}\n\n%\\bibliography{eppbibfile}\n\n%\\bibliography{eppbibfile27June2026}\n\n%apsrev4-2.bst 2019-01-14 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrev4-1.bst\n%Control: key (0)\n%Control: author (72) initials jnrlst\n%Control: editor formatted (1) identically to author\n%Control: production of article title (-1) disabled\n%Control: page (0) single\n%Control: year (1) truncated\n%Control: production of eprint (0) enabled\n\\begin{thebibliography}{25}%\n\t\\makeatletter\n\t\\providecommand \\@ifxundefined [1]{%\n\t\t\\@ifx{#1\\undefined}\n\t}%\n\t\\providecommand \\@ifnum [1]{%\n\t\t\\ifnum #1\\expandafter \\@firstoftwo\n\t\t\\else \\expandafter \\@secondoftwo\n\t\t\\fi\n\t}%\n\t\\providecommand \\@ifx [1]{%\n\t\t\\ifx #1\\expandafter \\@firstoftwo\n\t\t\\else \\expandafter \\@secondoftwo\n\t\t\\fi\n\t}%\n\t\\providecommand \\natexlab [1]{#1}%\n\t\\providecommand \\enquote [1]{``#1''}%\n\t\\providecommand \\bibnamefont [1]{#1}%\n\t\\providecommand \\bibfnamefont [1]{#1}%\n\t\\providecommand \\citenamefont [1]{#1}%\n\t\\providecommand \\href@noop [0]{\\@secondoftwo}%\n\t\\providecommand \\href [0]{\\begingroup \\@sanitize@url \\@href}%\n\t\\providecommand \\@href[1]{\\@@startlink{#1}\\@@href}%\n\t\\providecommand \\@@href[1]{\\endgroup#1\\@@endlink}%\n\t\\providecommand \\@sanitize@url [0]{\\catcode `\\\\12\\catcode `\\$12\\catcode\n\t\t`\\&12\\catcode `\\#12\\catcode `\\^12\\catcode `\\_12\\catcode `\\%12\\relax}%\n\t\\providecommand \\@@startlink[1]{}%\n\t\\providecommand \\@@endlink[0]{}%\n\t\\providecommand \\url [0]{\\begingroup\\@sanitize@url \\@url }%\n\t\\providecommand \\@url [1]{\\endgroup\\@href {#1}{\\urlprefix }}%\n\t\\providecommand \\urlprefix [0]{URL }%\n\t\\providecommand \\Eprint [0]{\\href }%\n\t\\providecommand \\doibase [0]{https://doi.org/}%\n\t\\providecommand \\selectlanguage [0]{\\@gobble}%\n\t\\providecommand \\bibinfo [0]{\\@secondoftwo}%\n\t\\providecommand \\bibfield [0]{\\@secondoftwo}%\n\t\\providecommand \\translation [1]{[#1]}%\n\t\\providecommand \\BibitemOpen [0]{}%\n\t\\providecommand \\bibitemStop [0]{}%\n\t\\providecommand \\bibitemNoStop [0]{.\\EOS\\space}%\n\t\\providecommand \\EOS [0]{\\spacefactor3000\\relax}%\n\t\\providecommand \\BibitemShut [1]{\\csname bibitem#1\\endcsname}%\n\t\\let\\auto@bib@innerbib\\@empty\n\t%</preamble>\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Papadopoulos}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n\t\t{Esposito}(1981)}]{Papadopoulos_1981}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {D.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Papadopoulos}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.~P.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Esposito}},\\ }\\href {https://doi.org/10.1086/159202} {\\bibfield {journal}\n\t\t{\\bibinfo {journal} {Astrophysical Journal}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume}\n\t\t\t{248}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {783} (\\bibinfo {year} {1981})}\\BibitemShut\n\t{NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Marklund}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2000)\\citenamefont\n\t\t{Marklund}, \\citenamefont {Brodin},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n\t\t{Dunsby}}]{Marklund_2000}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Marklund}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.}~\\bibnamefont {Brodin}},\\\n\t\tand\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.}~\\bibnamefont {Dunsby}},\\ }\\href\n\t{https://doi.org/10.1086/308957} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal}\n\t\t\t{Astrophys. J.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {536}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {875}\n\t\t(\\bibinfo {year} {2000})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Dirac}(1938)}]{10.1098/rspa.1938.0124}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {P.~A.~M.}\\\n\t\t\t\\bibnamefont {Dirac}},\\ }\\href {https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1938.0124}\n\t{\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Proceedings of the Royal Society\n\t\t\t\tof London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n\t\t\t{volume} {167}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {148} (\\bibinfo {year} {1938})},\\ \\Eprint\n\t{https://arxiv.org/abs/https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rspa/article-pdf/167/929/148/35258/rspa.1938.0124.pdf}\n\t{https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rspa/article-pdf/167/929/148/35258/rspa.1938.0124.pdf}\n\t\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Poisson}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2011)\\citenamefont\n\t\t{Poisson}, \\citenamefont {Pound},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Vega}}]{Poisson_2011}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Poisson}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.}~\\bibnamefont {Pound}},\\\n\t\tand\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {I.}~\\bibnamefont {Vega}},\\ }\\bibfield\n\t{journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Living Rev. Relativ.}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n\t\t{volume} {14}},\\ \\href {https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2011-7}\n\t{10.12942/lrr-2011-7} (\\bibinfo {year} {2011})\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {DeWitt}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n\t\t{Brehme}(1960)}]{DeWitt_1960}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{DeWitt}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.~W.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Brehme}},\\ }\\href\n\t{https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(60)90030-0} {\\bibfield\n\t\t{journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Annals of Physics}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n\t\t\t{volume} {9}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {220} (\\bibinfo {year} {1960})}\\BibitemShut\n\t{NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Hobbs}(1968)}]{Hobbs_1968}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Hobbs}},\\ }\\href\n\t{https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(68)90231-5} {\\bibfield\n\t\t{journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Annals of Physics}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n\t\t\t{volume} {47}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {141} (\\bibinfo {year} {1968})}\\BibitemShut\n\t{NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Cabral}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n\t\t{Lobo}(2017{\\natexlab{a}})}]{Cabral2017GW}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Cabral}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.~S.~N.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Lobo}},\\ }\\href {https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4791-z} {\\bibfield\n\t\t{journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {European Physical Journal C}\\ }\\textbf\n\t\t{\\bibinfo {volume} {77}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {237} (\\bibinfo {year}\n\t\t{2017}{\\natexlab{a}})},\\ \\Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.08157}\n\t{arXiv:1603.08157 [gr-qc]} \\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Cabral}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n\t\t{Lobo}(2017{\\natexlab{b}})}]{Cabral2017Astro}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Cabral}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.~S.~N.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Lobo}},\\ }\\href {https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2017-11618-2} {\\bibfield\n\t\t{journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {European Physical Journal Plus}\\ }\\textbf\n\t\t{\\bibinfo {volume} {132}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {304} (\\bibinfo {year}\n\t\t{2017}{\\natexlab{b}})},\\ \\Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.08180}\n\t{arXiv:1603.08180 [gr-qc]} \\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Cabral}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n\t\t{Lobo}(2017{\\natexlab{c}})}]{Cabral2017Found}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Cabral}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {F.~S.~N.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Lobo}},\\ }\\href {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-016-0051-6} {\\bibfield\n\t\t{journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Foundations of Physics}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n\t\t\t{volume} {47}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {208} (\\bibinfo {year}\n\t\t{2017}{\\natexlab{c}})},\\ \\Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.01492}\n\t{arXiv:1602.01492 [gr-qc]} \\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Sasaki}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n\t\t{Sato}(1978)}]{Sasaki_1978}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Sasaki}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {H.}~\\bibnamefont {Sato}},\\\n\t}\\href {https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.60.148} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo\n\t\t\t{journal} {Progress of Theoretical Physics}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume}\n\t\t\t{60}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {148} (\\bibinfo {year} {1978})}\\BibitemShut\n\t{NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Boughn}(1975)}]{Boughn_1975}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Boughn}},\\ }\\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.11.248} {\\bibfield\n\t\t{journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Phys. Rev. D}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume}\n\t\t\t{11}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {248} (\\bibinfo {year} {1975})}\\BibitemShut\n\t{NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {{Shapiro}}(1964)}]{1964ShapiroPhRvL.13.789S}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {I.~I.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{{Shapiro}}},\\ }\\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.789} {\\bibfield\n\t\t{journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physical Review Letters}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n\t\t\t{volume} {13}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {789} (\\bibinfo {year} {1964})}\\BibitemShut\n\t{NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Landau}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n\t\t{Lifshitz}(1975)}]{Landau_II}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {L.~D.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Landau}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.~M.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Lifshitz}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {title} {The Classical Theory\n\t\t\t\tof Fields}}},\\ \\bibinfo {edition} {4th}\\ ed.,\\ \\bibinfo {series} {Course of\n\t\tTheoretical Physics}, Vol.~\\bibinfo {volume} {2}\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher}\n\t{Butterworth Heinemann},\\ \\bibinfo {year} {1975})\\ p.\\ \\bibinfo {pages}\n\t{425}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Carroll}(2004)}]{Carroll_2004}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Carroll}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {title} {Spacetime and Geometry:\n\t\t\t\tAn Introduction to General Relativity}}}\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {Addison\n\t\tWesley},\\ \\bibinfo {year} {2004})\\ p.\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {513}\\BibitemShut\n\t{NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Hobson}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2006)\\citenamefont {Hobson},\n\t\t\\citenamefont {Efstathiou},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont {Lasenby}}]{Hobson_2006}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.~P.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Hobson}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {G.~P.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Efstathiou}},\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~N.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Lasenby}},\\ }\\href@noop {} {\\emph {\\bibinfo {title} {General Relativity: An\n\t\t\t\tIntroduction for Physicists}}}\\ (\\bibinfo {publisher} {Cambridge University\n\t\tPress},\\ \\bibinfo {address} {Cambridge},\\ \\bibinfo {year} {2006})\\ p.\\\n\t\\bibinfo {pages} {572}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Osetrin}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2024)\\citenamefont\n\t\t{Osetrin}, \\citenamefont {Epp},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n\t\t{Chervon}}]{Osetrin_2024}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {K.~E.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Osetrin}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {V.}~\\bibnamefont {Epp}},\\ and\\\n\t\t\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {S.~V.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Chervon}},\\ }\\href\n\t{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2024.169619} {\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo\n\t\t\t{journal} {Annals of Physics}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo {volume} {462}},\\ \\bibinfo\n\t\t{pages} {169619} (\\bibinfo {year} {2024})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Hadamard}(1923)}]{Hadamard_1923}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Hadamard}},\\ }\\href {https://books.google.ru/books?id=vn5xmgEACAAJ} {\\emph\n\t\t{\\bibinfo {title} {Lectures on Cauchy's Problem in Linear Partial\n\t\t\t\tDifferential Equations}}},\\ Mrs.~Hepsa Ely Silliman memorial lectures\\\n\t(\\bibinfo {publisher} {Yale University Press},\\ \\bibinfo {year}\n\t{1923})\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Balakin}\\ \\emph {et~al.}(2001)\\citenamefont\n\t\t{Balakin}, \\citenamefont {Kerner},\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n\t\t{Lemos}}]{balakin2001}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {A.~B.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Balakin}}, \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.}~\\bibnamefont {Kerner}},\\\n\t\tand\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.~P.~S.}\\ \\bibnamefont {Lemos}},\\\n\t}\\href {https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/18/11/315} {\\bibfield {journal}\n\t\t{\\bibinfo {journal} {Classical and Quantum Gravity}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n\t\t\t{volume} {18}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {2217} (\\bibinfo {year} {2001})},\\ \\Eprint\n\t{https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0012101} {arXiv:gr-qc/0012101 [gr-qc]}\n\t\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Gordon}(1923)}]{gordon1923}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {W.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Gordon}},\\ }\\href {https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19233772202} {\\bibfield\n\t\t{journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Annalen der Physik}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n\t\t\t{volume} {377}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {421} (\\bibinfo {year}\n\t\t{1923})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Erkul}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n\t\t{Leonhardt}(2026)}]{erkul2026}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {E.~E.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Erkul}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {U.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Leonhardt}},\\ }\\href {https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/ae58cf} {\\bibfield\n\t\t{journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {EPL (Europhysics Letters)}\\ }\\textbf\n\t\t{\\bibinfo {volume} {154}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {16003} (\\bibinfo {year}\n\t\t{2026})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Ehlers}(1993)}]{ehlers1993}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Ehlers}},\\ }\\href {https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00759031} {\\bibfield {journal}\n\t\t{\\bibinfo {journal} {General Relativity and Gravitation}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n\t\t\t{volume} {25}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1225} (\\bibinfo {year} {1993})},\\ \\bibinfo\n\t{note} {translation of the 1961 German original, which appeared in\n\t\tAbhandlungen der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse, Akademie der\n\t\tWissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz, Nr. 11, pp. 792-837}\\BibitemShut\n\t{NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Pleba\\'nski}(1960)}]{plebanski1960}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {J.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Pleba\\'nski}},\\ }\\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.118.1396} {\\bibfield\n\t\t{journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physical Review}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n\t\t\t{volume} {118}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {1396} (\\bibinfo {year}\n\t\t{1960})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Chen}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n\t\t{Kantowski}(2008)}]{chen2008}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Chen}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Kantowski}},\\ }\\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.044040} {\\bibfield\n\t\t{journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physical Review D}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n\t\t\t{volume} {78}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {044040} (\\bibinfo {year}\n\t\t{2008})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Chen}\\ and\\ \\citenamefont\n\t\t{Kantowski}(2009)}]{chen2009}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {B.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Chen}}\\ and\\ \\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {R.}~\\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Kantowski}},\\ }\\href {https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.104007} {\\bibfield\n\t\t{journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Physical Review D}\\ }\\textbf {\\bibinfo\n\t\t\t{volume} {79}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {104007} (\\bibinfo {year} {2009})},\\\n\t\\Eprint {https://arxiv.org/abs/0903.1677} {arXiv:0903.1677 [astro-ph.CO]}\n\t\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\t\\bibitem [{\\citenamefont {Ruggiero}(2025)}]{Ruggiero_2025}%\n\t\\BibitemOpen\n\t\\bibfield {author} {\\bibinfo {author} {\\bibfnamefont {M.~L.}\\ \\bibnamefont\n\t\t\t{Ruggiero}},\\ }\\href {https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13962-z}\n\t{\\bibfield {journal} {\\bibinfo {journal} {Eur. Phys. J. C}\\ }\\textbf\n\t\t{\\bibinfo {volume} {85}},\\ \\bibinfo {pages} {240} (\\bibinfo {year}\n\t\t{2025})}\\BibitemShut {NoStop}%\n\\end{thebibliography}%\n\n\n\\end{document}\n%\n% ****** End of file apstemplate.tex ******\n\n\n\n"}}}],"truncated":false,"partial":false},"paginationData":{"pageIndex":30911,"numItemsPerPage":100,"numTotalItems":3091241,"offset":3091100,"length":100}},"jwt":"eyJhbGciOiJFZERTQSIsImtpZCI6IjVHZDBvd0g5MTM2eDZjc1FvbE1zcktNWUZoRVFoUm5PVVVybEpjOUhaUEEifQ.eyJyZWFkIjp0cnVlLCJwZXJtaXNzaW9ucyI6eyJyZXBvLmNvbnRlbnQucmVhZCI6dHJ1ZX0sImlhdCI6MTc4NTA3ODgyMSwianRpIjoiMjNmMDkyNTAtMWJkMC00MDZkLWIzNzktYjZkOTA2ZTUzZTMxIiwic3ViIjoiL2RhdGFzZXRzL3NjaG9sYXJ3ZWF2ZS9hcnhpdi1sYXRleCIsImV4cCI6MTc4NTA4MjQyMSwiaXNzIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9odWdnaW5nZmFjZS5jbyJ9.JREyldYp59ak5GvwP94M-tHHKqIX-riPCAKrQYiOkOLLO0eaB25MVUoVSnYhPQ8GhowJUmoyropHNie8EU7YAw","displayUrls":true,"splitSizeSummaries":[{"config":"default","split":"train","numRows":3091241,"numBytesParquet":287413671924}]},"discussionsStats":{"closed":1,"open":5,"total":6},"fullWidth":true,"hasGatedAccess":true,"hasFullAccess":true,"isEmbedded":false,"savedQueries":{"community":[],"user":[]}}">
id stringlengths 10 16 | yymm_id stringlengths 8 8 | submitter stringlengths 1 50 ⌀ | authors stringlengths 4 5.17k ⌀ | title stringlengths 2 299 ⌀ | comments stringlengths 1 680 ⌀ | journal-ref stringlengths 6 545 ⌀ | doi stringlengths 9 138 ⌀ | report-no stringlengths 1 281 ⌀ | categories stringlengths 5 120 ⌀ | license stringclasses 9
values | abstract stringlengths 21 2.93k ⌀ | versions listlengths 0 57 | update_date stringdate 2007-05-23 00:00:00 2026-06-12 00:00:00 ⌀ | authors_parsed listlengths 0 413 | latex stringlengths 132 46.8M ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2606.31900 | 2606.31900 | Nikolaos Marmaridis | Nikolaos Marmaridis | Galois Extensions via Finiteness of Orbits | 15 pages | null | null | null | math.NT | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | We present an orbit--theoretic reformulation of Galois theory based on the natural action of automorphism groups on fields. Given a field $\mathbf{E}$ and a subgroup $H$ of the automorphism group $\mathrm{Aut}(\mathbf{E})$, we show that algebraic properties of the extension $\mathbf{E}/\mathbf{E}^H$, where $\mathbf{E}^... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:07:26 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Marmaridis",
"Nikolaos",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: arxiv-orbit-fin.tex
================================================
%!TEX TS-program = xelatex
\documentclass[12pt]{amsart}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\theoremstyle{plain}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{p... |
2606.31901 | 2606.31901 | Sangheon Yun | Sangheon Yun | Exact Planar Black Hole in AdS-Einstein-Scalar Gravity with IR Emergent Nearly Conformal Fluid | 20 pages | null | null | null | hep-th gr-qc | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | We study an exact analytic solution describing a static plane-symmetric hairy black brane in four-dimensional Einstein gravity minimally coupled to a neutral scalar, arising as a consistent truncation of the type IIA supergravity whose low-energy limit captures the strongly coupled thermal dynamics of the ABJM theory. ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:07:36 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Yun",
"Sangheon",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: PHBHv1.tex
================================================
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{epsfig}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
\newcom... |
2606.31902 | 2606.31902 | Max Huisman Mr. | Max Huisman, Ali Azadbakht, Patrick B. Warren, Daniela J. Kraft | Self-Generated Electric Fields in Polyelectrolyte Gradients Increase Microparticle Transport | 7 pages, 3 figures | null | null | null | cond-mat.soft | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | There are many situations in nature and industry where small particles are exposed to gradients of charged polymers, such as enzymes in biological gradients of DNA or RNA, virus particles in respiratory droplets, and colloidal particles in stratifying paint layers. Here, we study the phoretic propulsion of charged micr... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:07:39 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Huisman",
"Max",
""
],
[
"Azadbakht",
"Ali",
""
],
[
"Warren",
"Patrick B.",
""
],
[
"Kraft",
"Daniela J.",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: SI.tex
================================================
% ****** Start of file apssamp.tex ******
%
% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4.2 distribution.
% Version 4.2a of REVTeX, December 2014
%
% Copyright (c) 2014 The American Physical Socie... |
2606.31903 | 2606.31903 | Zhaoyang Luo | Zhaoyang Luo, Runmin Dong, Miao Yang, Fan Wei, Yushan Lai, Bin Luo, Haohuan Fu | Attend, Transform, or Silence: Operator-Level Visual Skipping for Efficient Multimodal LLM Inference | null | null | null | null | cs.CV cs.AI | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) increasingly process long visual-token sequences, increasing the overall inference computation. Existing acceleration methods usually remove visual tokens or skip visual-token updates in entire layers, but these coarse strategies may discard fine-grained evidence or suppress use... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:08:29 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Luo",
"Zhaoyang",
""
],
[
"Dong",
"Runmin",
""
],
[
"Yang",
"Miao",
""
],
[
"Wei",
"Fan",
""
],
[
"Lai",
"Yushan",
""
],
[
"Luo",
"Bin",
""
],
[
"Fu",
"Haohuan",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: acl.sty
================================================
% This is the LaTex style file for *ACL.
% The official sources can be found at
%
% https://github.com/acl-org/acl-style-files/
%
% This package is activated by adding
%
% \usepackage{acl}
%
% to your ... |
2606.31904 | 2606.31904 | Yazid Attabi | Mohamed Gueye, Yazid Attabi, Manuel Morales, and Maxime Dumas | Sequential RC-TGAN: Generating Relational Time Series with Spectral Envelope Loss | null | null | null | null | cs.LG | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | The generation of synthetic relational databases often involves modeling complex temporal dynamics, such as transaction logs or event sequences. A significant challenge in this domain is the handling of categorical time series (e.g., status codes), where standard encoding methods like one-hot encoding fail to capture i... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:09:10 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Gueye",
"Mohamed",
""
],
[
"Attabi",
"Yazid",
""
],
[
"Morales",
"Manuel",
""
],
[
"Dumas",
"Maxime",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: IEEEtran.cls
================================================
%%
%% IEEEtran.cls 2015/08/26 version V1.8b
%%
%% This is the IEEEtran LaTeX class for authors of the Institute of
%% Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Transactions journals and
%% conference... |
2606.31905 | 2606.31905 | Zihui Liu | Zihui Liu, Junhua Zhou, Tianrui Chen, Michael Penny, Sara Mosca, Mengyuan Cui, Vandana Tiwari, R. J. Dwayne Miller, Fulu Zheng, Ajay Jha, and Hong-Guang Duan | Conical Intersections Enable Ultrafast Molecular Spin Control in a Chromium Complex | null | null | null | null | physics.chem-ph | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Molecular spintronics seeks to control spin states in single molecules for ultrafast switching and efficient information processing. Transition metal complexes are promising candidates for such applications due to their modular ligand fields, diverse spin configurations, and potential for spin-vibronic coupling that fa... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:09:11 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Liu",
"Zihui",
""
],
[
"Zhou",
"Junhua",
""
],
[
"Chen",
"Tianrui",
""
],
[
"Penny",
"Michael",
""
],
[
"Mosca",
"Sara",
""
],
[
"Cui",
"Mengyuan",
""
],
[
"Tiwari",
"Vandana",
""
],
[
"Miller",
... | ================================================
FILE: ms_final.tex
================================================
\documentclass{nature}
%% make sure you have the nature.cls and naturemag.bst files where
%% LaTeX can find them
%% bequ {equation} beqn {eqnarray} beqm {mequation} beam {meqnarray}
\usepackage{amsmath... |
2606.31906 | 2606.31906 | EPTCS | Mauro Ferrari (Dep. of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, Universit\`a degli Studi dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy), Camillo Fiorentini (Dep. of Computer Science, Universit\`a degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy), Paolo Giardini (Dep. of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, Universit\`a degli Studi dell'Insubria, Varese, Ita... | A G\"odel Modal Logic Over Witnessed Models | In Proceedings AiML 2026, arXiv:2606.29444 | EPTCS 447, 2026, pp. 355-373 | 10.4204/EPTCS.447.20 | null | cs.LO | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | We introduce GW, a G\"odel modal logic based on Kripke models in which the value of each modal formula is witnessed by an accessible world. This witnessed semantics eliminates the limit-based phenomena that preclude the finite model property in the usual Kripke semantics for G\"odel modal logics, thereby yielding a mor... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:09:43 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Ferrari",
"Mauro",
"",
"Dep. of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, Università degli Studi dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy"
],
[
"Fiorentini",
"Camillo",
"",
"Dep. of Computer Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy"
],
[
"Giardini",
"Paolo",
"",
... | ================================================
FILE: aiml26.sty
================================================
%%%%
%%%% Additional style file for AiML 2026
%%%%
%%%% Please make sure to include this file in your document, with the command:
%%%% \usepackage{aiml26macro}
%%%%
%%%%
%%%% Do NOT modify the file eptc... |
2606.31907 | 2606.31907 | Hyung-Chan An | Jongseo Lee, Jaehyeok Kwak, Hyung-Chan An | Improved Algorithms for Bounded-Degree (Subset) Traveling Salesman Problems | 21 pages, 1 figure | null | null | null | cs.DS | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | We present improved algorithms for several bounded-degree traveling salesman problems. In the bounded-degree traveling salesman path problem (BDTSPP), given a weighted graph G=(V,E), two endpoints s and t, and degree bounds b_v for all v, the goal is to find a minimum-cost subgraph of G that admits an Eulerian s-t path... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:10:19 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Lee",
"Jongseo",
""
],
[
"Kwak",
"Jaehyeok",
""
],
[
"An",
"Hyung-Chan",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: appendixA.tex
================================================
\section{Deferred from Section~\ref{sec:tsp}: Bounded-Degree Traveling Salesman Problems}
\subsection{Analysis of Our \texorpdfstring{$(5/3, +4)$}{(5/3, +4)}-Approximation Algorithm for BDTSPP}\label{... |
2606.31908 | 2606.31908 | T. Kyle Petersen | Tejo Madhavarapu, T. Kyle Petersen, and Peter Winkler | Is There An Ideal Color Wheel? | 7 pages, 5 figures, comments welcome | null | null | null | math.CO math.PR | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | The familiar color wheel is a disk divided into six sectors, colored red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and purple, in circular order. Three of the colors can be obtained by blending the colors in the two neighboring sectors.
One might wonder: is there a color wheel in which all six of the sections have this property,... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:11:40 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Madhavarapu",
"Tejo",
""
],
[
"Petersen",
"T. Kyle",
""
],
[
"Winkler",
"Peter",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: ColorWheel.tex
================================================
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{latexsym}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{verbatim}
\usepackage{tikz}
\u... |
2606.31909 | 2606.31909 | Bowen Jiang | Bowen Jiang, William Painter Reger, Roberto Martin-Martin | CoDex: Learning Compositional Dexterous Functional Manipulation without Demonstrations | IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2026. Project page: https://robin-lab.cs.utexas.edu/CoDex/ | null | null | null | cs.RO | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | In this work, we study Compositional Dexterous Functional Object Manipulation (CD-FOM): tasks such as aiming and actuating a spray bottle on a plant or a glue gun on wood, which require both actuating an object's internal mechanism and controlling its pose to apply the object's function to the environment. These tasks ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:12:30 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Jiang",
"Bowen",
""
],
[
"Reger",
"William Painter",
""
],
[
"Martin-Martin",
"Roberto",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: 0_abstract.tex
================================================
\begin{abstract}
In this work, we study \textit{Compositional Dexterous Functional Object Manipulation} (CD-FOM): tasks such as aiming and actuating a spray bottle on a plant or a glue g... |
2606.31910 | 2606.31910 | Morten Hjorth-Jensen | Maria Elena Perruzza, Niyaz R. Beysengulov, Stian D. Bilek, Antoine Y. M. C. Camper, Jonas B. Flaten, Morten Hjorth-Jensen, Gunnar F. Lange, Oskar Leinonen, Jan Malamant, Francesco P. Massel, Johannes Pollanen, Heidi Sandaker, Zachary J. Stewart, Viktor Svensson, and Jared D. Weidman | Electrons on Helium and Entangled Quantum Sensors for Particle Physics | 17 pages, 7 figures | null | null | null | quant-ph | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Quantum sensors that harness quantum coherence and entanglement are emerging as powerful tools in many fields, including particle physics, promising unprecedented sensitivity beyond classical detection methods. At the same time, electrons trapped on the surface of liquid helium have emerged as a promising quantum compu... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:13:30 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Perruzza",
"Maria Elena",
""
],
[
"Beysengulov",
"Niyaz R.",
""
],
[
"Bilek",
"Stian D.",
""
],
[
"Camper",
"Antoine Y. M. C.",
""
],
[
"Flaten",
"Jonas B.",
""
],
[
"Hjorth-Jensen",
"Morten",
""
],
[
"Lange",
... | ================================================
FILE: paperarxiv.tex
================================================
\documentclass[amsmath,amssymb,aps,superscriptaddress,nofootinbib,floatfix]{revtex4-2}
%\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{amsfonts,amssymb,stmaryrd,latexsym,amsmath,brak... |
2606.31911 | 2606.31911 | Juan Vidal Alegr\'ia | Juan Vidal Alegr\'ia, Joao Vieira, Ove Edfors | Trade-Offs in Decentralized Gigantic MIMO with Hard-Boundary Constraints | 5 pages, 3 figures. This work has been submitted to an IEEE journal for possible publication | null | null | null | eess.SP cs.IT math.IT | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | To maintain the antenna apertures offered by 5G massive MIMO systems operating at the sub-6GHz band, known as FR1, 6G base stations (BSs) using the upper-mid band, FR3, should increase the number of antennas by a factor 4-8, giving rise to gigantic MIMO. This poses challenges in terms of processing complexity and inter... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:14:11 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Alegría",
"Juan Vidal",
""
],
[
"Vieira",
"Joao",
""
],
[
"Edfors",
"Ove",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: IEEEabrv.bib
================================================
IEEEabrv.bib
V1.13 (2008/09/30)
Copyright (c) 2002-2008 by Michael Shell
See: http://www.michaelshell.org/
for current contact information.
BibTeX bibliography string definitions of the ABBREVIATED tit... |
2606.31912 | 2606.31912 | Jiale Fan | Jiale Fan, Connor Flynn, Tianao Xu, Junzhe He, Andrei Cramariuc, Marco Hutter, Robert Baines | Learning Locomotion on Discrete Terrain via Minimal Proximity Sensing | Accepted to IROS 2026 | null | null | null | cs.RO | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Learning-based control has revolutionized dynamic locomotion, yet navigating unstructured terrain remains limited by a robot's incomplete awareness of imminent ground contact. While global perception systems such as LiDARs and depth cameras provide environmental context, they are frequently plagued by latencies, occlus... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:16:37 GMT"
},
{
"version": "v2",
"created": "Thu, 02 Jul 2026 12:23:51 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-03 | [
[
"Fan",
"Jiale",
""
],
[
"Flynn",
"Connor",
""
],
[
"Xu",
"Tianao",
""
],
[
"He",
"Junzhe",
""
],
[
"Cramariuc",
"Andrei",
""
],
[
"Hutter",
"Marco",
""
],
[
"Baines",
"Robert",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: IEEEabrv.bib
================================================
%%
%% IEEEabrv.bib
%%
%% BibTeX bibliography string definitions of the ABBREVIATED titles of
%% IEEE journals and magazines
%%
%% NOTE: This text file uses MS Windows line feed conventions. When (human)... |
2606.31913 | 2606.31913 | Mariana Navarro Asan-Srain | Mariana Navarro, Leonardo Zambrano | Certifying quantum states without independence assumptions | 9 pages, 3 figures | null | null | null | quant-ph | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Standard quantum verification and certification protocols often assume that experimental sources emit independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) states. In realistic scenarios, however, temporal drift, memory effects, feedback, and correlated noise can violate this assumption, causing standard analyses to underes... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:16:38 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Navarro",
"Mariana",
""
],
[
"Zambrano",
"Leonardo",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: biblio.bib
================================================
@article{brunner2014bell,
title = {Bell nonlocality},
author = {Brunner, Nicolas and Cavalcanti, Daniel and Pironio, Stefano and Scarani, Valerio and Wehner, Stephanie},
journal = {Rev. Mod. Phys.},
... |
2606.31914 | 2606.31914 | Andrey Kuznetsov | Andrey A. Kuznetsov, Vittoria Sposini, Sofia S. Kantorovich, Aleksei V. Chechkin | Drift-diffusion interplay in active Brownian particles under orienting field | null | null | null | null | cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Magnetic active particles offer a versatile route to externally controlled microscale transport by combining self-propulsion with field-tunable orientation, as realized in both synthetic and living magnetic microswimmers. Here, we develop a theoretical framework for three-dimensional active Brownian motion in a uniform... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:17:38 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Kuznetsov",
"Andrey A.",
""
],
[
"Sposini",
"Vittoria",
""
],
[
"Kantorovich",
"Sofia S.",
""
],
[
"Chechkin",
"Aleksei V.",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: preprint.bbl
================================================
%apsrev4-2.bst 2019-01-14 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrev4-1.bst
%Control: key (0)
%Control: author (8) initials jnrlst
%Control: editor formatted (1) identically to author
%Control: production of art... |
2606.31915 | 2606.31915 | Jiachen Cong | Jiachen Cong and Jingbo Liu | Accelerating Conformal Prediction via Approximate Leave-One-Out | null | null | null | null | stat.ML cs.LG | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | While conformal prediction provides a general framework for uncertainty quantification in predictive inference, its application is often limited by computational cost. Recent methods, including Jackknife+ and Jackknife-minmax, achieve faster computation by trading a slight loss of efficiency relative to full conformal ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:21:48 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Cong",
"Jiachen",
""
],
[
"Liu",
"Jingbo",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: fancyhdr.sty
================================================
% fancyhdr.sty version 3.2
% Fancy headers and footers for LaTeX.
% Piet van Oostrum,
% Dept of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Utrecht,
% Padualaan 14, P.O. Box 80.089, 3508 TB Utrecht... |
2606.31916 | 2606.31916 | Ben Slater | Ben Slater, Matteo G. Mecattaf, Lucy G. Cheke, John Burden, Winnie Street | Theory of Mind and Persuasion Beyond Conversation: Assessing the Capacity of LLMs to Induce Belief States via Planning and Action | 29 pages, 12 figures | null | null | null | cs.CL | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Theory of Mind (ToM) benchmarks for Large Language Models (LLMs) typically rely on passive question-answering formats, but the deployment of LLMs in increasingly agentic and autonomous forms demands new evaluations. In this paper we evaluate an agent's ability to induce specific belief states in other agents by taking ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:22:12 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Slater",
"Ben",
""
],
[
"Mecattaf",
"Matteo G.",
""
],
[
"Cheke",
"Lucy G.",
""
],
[
"Burden",
"John",
""
],
[
"Street",
"Winnie",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: bibliography.bib
================================================
// LLM ToM
@article{bubeck2023paper,
title={Paper Review:'Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4'},
author={Bubeck, S{\'e}bastien and Chandrasekaran, Varun and E... |
2606.31917 | 2606.31917 | Susanna Bisogni | Susanna Bisogni, Giustina Vietri, Enrico Piconcelli, Federica Ricci, Andrea Travascio, Paolo Franzetti, Adriana Gargiulo and Chiara Mancini | Unveiling the Cosmic Dawn with SHARP: Probing extended Lyman-$\alpha$ nebulae in a Universe less than 600 Myr old | 9 pages, 1 figure, accepted for publication in New Astronomy as part of the SHARP Science Book | null | null | null | astro-ph.GA astro-ph.IM | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | The existence of luminous quasars just a few hundred million years after the Big Bang challenges our understanding of both black hole growth and galaxy formation and evolution. These objects harbour supermassive black holes exceeding a billion solar masses (M$_{BH} > 10^{9} M_{\odot}$) by redshift $z\sim 6.5$-$7.5$, po... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:22:33 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Bisogni",
"Susanna",
""
],
[
"Vietri",
"Giustina",
""
],
[
"Piconcelli",
"Enrico",
""
],
[
"Ricci",
"Federica",
""
],
[
"Travascio",
"Andrea",
""
],
[
"Franzetti",
"Paolo",
""
],
[
"Gargiulo",
"Adriana",
"... | ================================================
FILE: bib.bib
================================================
@ARTICLE{Kormendy2013,
author = {{Kormendy}, John and {Ho}, Luis C.},
title = "{Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies}",
journal = {\araa},
keywords = {A... |
2606.31918 | 2606.31918 | Junzhe Jiang | Junzhe Jiang and Zipei Ma and Zijie Pan and Li Zhang | DriveWeaver: Point-Conditioned Video Inpainting for Controllable Vehicle Insertion in Autonomous Driving Simulation | Accepted at ECCV 2026, Project Page: https://github.com/LogosRoboticsGroup/DriveWeaver | null | null | null | cs.CV | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | A pivotal step in autonomous driving simulation involves inserting foreground vehicles with predefined trajectories into simulated scenes. This process enhances scene diversity and facilitates the creation of various corner cases for testing and improving autonomous driving models. However, existing methods often rely ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:23:32 GMT"
},
{
"version": "v2",
"created": "Thu, 02 Jul 2026 07:50:25 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-03 | [
[
"Jiang",
"Junzhe",
""
],
[
"Ma",
"Zipei",
""
],
[
"Pan",
"Zijie",
""
],
[
"Zhang",
"Li",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: eccv.sty
================================================
% ---------------------------------------------------------------
%
% Formatting Package for ECCV Submissions
%
% initially created for ECCV 2024
% by Stefan Roth
%
% based on previous ECCV templates:
% u... |
2606.31919 | 2606.31919 | Wenyuan Xie | Wenyuan Xie, Shaokai Wu, Yijin Zhou, Yanbiao Ji, Guodong Zhang, Bayram Bayramli, Qiuchang Li, Xunchu Zhou, Yue Ding, Hongtao Lu | MVP-Nav: Multi-layer Value Map Planner Navigator | null | null | null | null | cs.RO cs.AI cs.CV | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Zero-shot Object Goal Navigation (ZSON) with RGB-only perception poses a fundamental challenge for embodied agents, as the absence of explicit depth information introduces severe physical uncertainty and semantic-physical misalignment. Existing approaches either rely on high-level semantic reasoning without geometric g... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:25:47 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Xie",
"Wenyuan",
""
],
[
"Wu",
"Shaokai",
""
],
[
"Zhou",
"Yijin",
""
],
[
"Ji",
"Yanbiao",
""
],
[
"Zhang",
"Guodong",
""
],
[
"Bayramli",
"Bayram",
""
],
[
"Li",
"Qiuchang",
""
],
[
"Zhou",
"... | ================================================
FILE: IEEEtran.cls
================================================
%%
%% IEEEtran.cls 2007/03/05 version V1.7a
%%
%%
%% This is the official IEEE LaTeX class for authors of the Institute of
%% Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Transactions journals and
%% c... |
2606.31920 | 2606.31920 | EPTCS | Simon Santschi, Niels C. Vooijs | Logics Containing wK4: Selection \`a la Fine | In Proceedings AiML 2026, arXiv:2606.29444 | EPTCS 447, 2026, pp. 674-690 | 10.4204/EPTCS.447.38 | null | cs.LO | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | We generalize Fine's Iterative Selection Method to the weakly transitive setting. In particular, this provides a transparent frame-theoretic proof of the finite model property for (strongly) cofinal subframe logics extending wK4, which was previously established using algebraic methods. Using the same construction, we ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:26:57 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Santschi",
"Simon",
""
],
[
"Vooijs",
"Niels C.",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: eptcs.cls
================================================
\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1995/12/01]
\ProvidesClass{eptcs}[2022/05/20 v1.7]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%% options ... |
2606.31921 | 2606.31921 | Zhangyong Liang | Zhangyong Liang, Huanhuan Gao | Interface-Aware Neural Newton Preconditioning for Robust Cohesive Zone Model Simulations | null | null | null | null | cs.LG cs.NA math.NA | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Cohesive Zone Models (CZMs) are widely used to simulate interface fracture, delamination, adhesive failure, and fiber--matrix debonding in aerospace composite structures. In implicit quasi-static finite element analyses, cohesive softening may introduce negative interface tangents, solution jumps, and Newton-basin mism... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:30:15 GMT"
},
{
"version": "v2",
"created": "Wed, 01 Jul 2026 03:57:52 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-02 | [
[
"Liang",
"Zhangyong",
""
],
[
"Gao",
"Huanhuan",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: main.tex
================================================
% Template-aligned Elsevier CRC journal article format
\pdfminorversion=7
\documentclass[3p,times]{elsarticle}
\makeatletter
\nopreprintlinefalse
\def\ps@pprintTitle{%
\let\@oddhead\@empty
\let\@evenhe... |
2606.31922 | 2606.31922 | Vitali Vougalter | Vitali Vougalter | Solvability in the sense of sequences for certain non-Fredholm operators with a drift and Laplace and bi-Laplace operators | null | null | null | null | math.AP | http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | We study the solvability of some linear nonhomogeneous elliptic problems and establish that under certain technical assumptions the convergence in $L^2$ of their right-hand sides yields the existence and the convergence in $H^4$ of the solutions. The equations contain fourth order differential operators with or without... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:31:06 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Vougalter",
"Vitali",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: seqdrnbif.tex
================================================
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\documentclass[11pt]{amsart}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
%\usepackage[initia... |
2606.31923 | 2606.31923 | Susanne Siebentritt | Francesco Lodola, Zhuangyi Zhou, Boaz Koren, Saeed Bayat, Alessandro Magon, Yucheng Hu, Adrian-Marie Philippe, Michele Melchiorre, Hasan Arif Yetkin, Gunnar Kusch, Nathalie Valle, Rachel A. Oliver and Susanne Siebentritt | What enables GaOx as hole transport layer for a 16 percent 1.0 eV CuInSe2 Bottom Cells with VOC above 550 mV? | null | null | null | null | cond-mat.mtrl-sci | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Among the highly efficient photovoltaic technologies, that do not rely on epitaxy, only chalcopyrites have a bandgap tunable down to 1.00 eV, the ideal for tandem applications. This is obtained with a pure CuInSe2 absorber without Ga. GaOx has been shown to be an efficient hole transport layer that prevents recombinati... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:31:20 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Lodola",
"Francesco",
""
],
[
"Zhou",
"Zhuangyi",
""
],
[
"Koren",
"Boaz",
""
],
[
"Bayat",
"Saeed",
""
],
[
"Magon",
"Alessandro",
""
],
[
"Hu",
"Yucheng",
""
],
[
"Philippe",
"Adrian-Marie",
""
],
[
... | null |
2606.31924 | 2606.31924 | Xiaoyu Liu | Xiaoyu Liu, Huan Wang, Fan Li, Zhixin Wang, Jiaqi Xu, Ming Liu, and Wangmeng Zuo | InstanceControl: Controllable Complex Image Generation without Instance Labeling | null | null | null | null | cs.CV | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Controllable image generation methods, such as ControlNet, have demonstrated a remarkable capacity to introduce visual conditions(e.g., depth maps) to guide image generation. However, these methods often struggle with complex multi-instance scenes, frequently leading to attribute confusion among instances. While recent... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:33:03 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Liu",
"Xiaoyu",
""
],
[
"Wang",
"Huan",
""
],
[
"Li",
"Fan",
""
],
[
"Wang",
"Zhixin",
""
],
[
"Xu",
"Jiaqi",
""
],
[
"Liu",
"Ming",
""
],
[
"Zuo",
"Wangmeng",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: eccv.sty
================================================
% ---------------------------------------------------------------
%
% Formatting Package for ECCV Submissions
%
% initially created for ECCV 2024
% by Stefan Roth
%
% based on previous ECCV templates:
% u... |
2606.31925 | 2606.31925 | Si-Nong Liu | Sumit R. Das, Shaun D. Hampton, Sinong Liu, Gautam Mandal | Fate of "Space-like singularities" in $c=1$ Matrix Model | 32 pages, 14 figures | null | null | null | hep-th cond-mat.stat-mech gr-qc | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | A class of time dependent backgrounds in two dimensional String Theory leads to superluminal Liouville walls on the worldsheet. In the dual double scaled $c=1$ matrix model these backgrounds involve eigenvalues leaking out to infinity, and the collective field fluctuations become strongly coupled along space-like regio... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:33:16 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Das",
"Sumit R.",
""
],
[
"Hampton",
"Shaun D.",
""
],
[
"Liu",
"Sinong",
""
],
[
"Mandal",
"Gautam",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: fate-of-singularity.tex
================================================
%\documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{article}
\documentclass[letterpaper,11pt]{article}
\pdfoutput=1 % if your are submitting a pdflatex (i.e. if you have
% images in pdf, png or jpg for... |
2606.31926 | 2606.31926 | Prajna Nair | Prajna Nair, Christos Panagiotou, Megan Masterson, Kishalay De, Erin Kara, Eleanor Winkler, M. Subhi Abo Rdan | A Suppressed Volumetric Rate of High-Luminosity Mid-Infrared Selected Tidal Disruption Events | 11 pages, 4 figures (+ 4 pages, 4 figures in appendix); Accepted for publication in ApJ | null | null | null | astro-ph.HE | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Tidal Disruption Events (TDEs) serve as direct probes of the population of supermassive black holes in the center of galaxies and are nowadays regularly detected in optical wide-field time-domain sky surveys. Recent studies have demonstrated that a large fraction of TDEs can be uniquely identified in the infrared (IR) ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:33:29 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Nair",
"Prajna",
""
],
[
"Panagiotou",
"Christos",
""
],
[
"Masterson",
"Megan",
""
],
[
"De",
"Kishalay",
""
],
[
"Kara",
"Erin",
""
],
[
"Winkler",
"Eleanor",
""
],
[
"Rdan",
"M. Subhi Abo",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: aastex631.cls
================================================
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% AASTEX631.cls %%
%% Jan 29f, 2021 %%
%% ... |
2606.31927 | 2606.31927 | EPTCS | Marco Lewis (Universit\'e Paris-Saclay, CNRS, CentraleSup\'elec, ENS Paris-Saclay, Inria, Laboratoire M\'ethodes Formelles), Nesta van der Schaaf (Universit\'e Paris-Saclay, CNRS, CentraleSup\'elec, ENS Paris-Saclay, Inria, Laboratoire M\'ethodes Formelles) | Some Results on Causal Modalities in General Spacetimes | In Proceedings AiML 2026, arXiv:2606.29444. AiML 2026 proceedings version of arXiv.2601.14029 | EPTCS 447, 2026, pp. 584-602 | 10.4204/EPTCS.447.33 | EPTCS 447-33 | cs.LO | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Causality is one of the fundamental structures of spacetimes, determining the possible behaviour and propagation of physical information. Causal structure can be analysed through the various modal logics it induces. The modal logics for the chronological and causal relations of the archetypal Minkowski spacetime have b... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:35:43 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Lewis",
"Marco",
"",
"Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, CentraleSupélec, ENS Paris-Saclay, Inria, Laboratoire Méthodes Formelles"
],
[
"van der Schaaf",
"Nesta",
"",
"Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, CentraleSupélec, ENS Paris-Saclay, Inria, Laboratoire Méthodes Formelles"
]
] | ================================================
FILE: Images/chronnotcntvspacetime.tex
================================================
\scalebox{.8}{
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node[cylinder, draw, shape border rotate = 90, aspect=3, minimum height = 6cm, minimum width=2cm] (A) {};
% \draw[dashed] (M.after bottom) ... |
2606.31928 | 2606.31928 | Miklas Sch\"utte | Miklas Sch\"utte, Stephen Hocker, Hansj\"org Lipp, Johannes Roth, Stefanos Fasoulas, and Marcel Pfeiffer | Conditional Normalizing Flow for Gas-Surface Scattering from Thermal to Hypersonic Velocities | null | null | null | null | physics.comp-ph | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | Accurate aerodynamic modeling of satellites in very low Earth orbit (VLEO) requires gas-surface interaction (GSI) models that capture the full velocity spectrum from thermal to orbital speeds. Atmospheric particles initially strike spacecraft surfaces at hypersonic velocities of 6 000 - 10 000 m/s. Due to surface rough... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:36:33 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Schütte",
"Miklas",
""
],
[
"Hocker",
"Stephen",
""
],
[
"Lipp",
"Hansjörg",
""
],
[
"Roth",
"Johannes",
""
],
[
"Fasoulas",
"Stefanos",
""
],
[
"Pfeiffer",
"Marcel",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: acronyms.tex
================================================
\newacronym{md}{MD}{molecular dynamics}
\newacronym{gsi}{GSI}{gas-surface interaction}
\newacronym{dsmc}{DSMC}{direct simulation Monte Carlo}
\newacronym{cvae}{cVAE}{conditional Variational Autoencoder}
... |
2606.31929 | 2606.31929 | Adriana Fern\'andez Quero | Adriana Fern\'andez Quero, Adrian Ioana, Hui Tan | A class of II$_1$ factors without non-trivial crossed product decompositions | null | null | null | null | math.OA math.FA | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | We introduce a class of separable II$_1$ factors $M$ admitting no non-trivial crossed product decompositions: $M\not\cong B\rtimes_\sigma G$, for any trace preserving action $G\curvearrowright^\sigma (B,\tau)$ of an infinite countable group $G$ on a tracial von Neumann algebra $(B,\tau)$. These provide the first exampl... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:36:56 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Quero",
"Adriana Fernández",
""
],
[
"Ioana",
"Adrian",
""
],
[
"Tan",
"Hui",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: final_cleaned.tex
================================================
\documentclass[a4paper,11pt]{amsart}
\usepackage{amsmath,amsthm,amssymb}
\usepackage[mathscr]{eucal}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\usepackage[bookmarks,bookmarksnumbered]{hyperref}
\usepackage{enumerat... |
2606.31930 | 2606.31930 | Thomas Glinnan | Desmond Fairall, Thomas Glinnan | Quasi-Bayesian Hierarchical Models | null | null | null | null | econ.EM | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | We develop the Quasi-Bayesian Hierarchical Model (QBHM) for grouped GMM settings. The framework combines Bayesian hierarchical modelling with Laplace-type estimation: it preserves each group-specific objective function, while introducing a pooling term for economically comparable parameters. When the number of studies ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:36:58 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Fairall",
"Desmond",
""
],
[
"Glinnan",
"Thomas",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: difuse_prior_performance_table.tex
================================================
% Requires \usepackage{booktabs}
\begin{table}[htbp]
\centering
\scriptsize
\caption{Model performance under very diffuse priors for varying instrument strength, group size, and poo... |
2606.31931 | 2606.31931 | Kailiang Wu | Manting Peng, Kailiang Wu | Hidden Accuracy and Superconvergence Analysis of Central Discontinuous Galerkin Methods on Overlapping Meshes | null | null | null | null | math.NA cs.NA | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | This paper establishes the first rigorous superconvergence theory for semidiscrete and fully discrete central discontinuous Galerkin (CDG) methods for linear hyperbolic equations on overlapping meshes. While the optimal $L^2$ convergence of $\mathbb{Q}^k$ CDG schemes was established on uniform Cartesian meshes by Liu, ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:37:50 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Peng",
"Manting",
""
],
[
"Wu",
"Kailiang",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: CDG_super.bbl
================================================
\begin{thebibliography}{10}
\bibitem{adjerid_flaherty_krivodonova_2002}
{\sc S.~Adjerid, K.~D. Devine, J.~E. Flaherty, and L.~Krivodonova}, {\em A
posteriori error estimation for discontinuous {Galer... |
2606.31932 | 2606.31932 | Marit Fiechter | Marit R. Fiechter and Jeremy O. Richardson | Resonant and collective modification of London dispersion interactions under vibrational strong coupling | null | null | null | null | physics.chem-ph quant-ph | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Experiments have shown that, by tuning a microcavity to resonance with a vibrational mode of the molecules contained within it, one can modify chemical properties, such as reaction rates. This gives rise to the exciting prospect of steering chemical reactivity, just by placing a pair of carefully spaced mirrors around ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:38:31 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Fiechter",
"Marit R.",
""
],
[
"Richardson",
"Jeremy O.",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: main.bbl
================================================
%apsrev4-2.bst 2019-01-14 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrev4-1.bst
%Control: key (0)
%Control: author (8) initials jnrlst
%Control: editor formatted (1) identically to author
%Control: production of article... |
2606.31933 | 2606.31933 | Haojian Huang | Haojian Huang, Harold Haodong Chen, Meng Luo, Junjia Du, Shanqing Xu, Ziheng Chen, Yanxiang Huang, Yinchuan Li, Ying-Cong Chen | No Place to Hide: Benchmarking Video Hallucination with Background-Controlled Pairs | ECCV 2026 | null | null | null | cs.CV | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | We introduce VidPair-Halluc, a new benchmark for evaluating video hallucination in large video models (LVMs) under rigorous and controlled conditions. Unlike previous benchmarks that primarily rely on text-based perturbations or adversarial questions while neglecting the consistency of visual backgrounds, VidPair-Hallu... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:38:41 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Huang",
"Haojian",
""
],
[
"Chen",
"Harold Haodong",
""
],
[
"Luo",
"Meng",
""
],
[
"Du",
"Junjia",
""
],
[
"Xu",
"Shanqing",
""
],
[
"Chen",
"Ziheng",
""
],
[
"Huang",
"Yanxiang",
""
],
[
"Li",
... | ================================================
FILE: eccv.sty
================================================
% ---------------------------------------------------------------
%
% Formatting Package for ECCV Submissions
%
% initially created for ECCV 2024
% by Stefan Roth
%
% based on previous ECCV templates:
% u... |
2606.31934 | 2606.31934 | Tatiana Latychevskaia | Pankaj Kumar and Michel Bosman and Nikolai Lavrentev and He Zheng and Ding Peng and Kostya S. Novoselov and Tatiana Latychevskaia | Untangling 3D atomic reconstruction in twisted bilayer 2D crystals via dark field transmission electron microscopy | null | Nano Letters, Volume 26, Issue 21, 6965-6971, 2026 | 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6c00944 | null | cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Reconstruction of the atomic crystal structure in twisted 2D materials has been demonstrated to be responsible for multiple exciting phenomena in van der Waals heterostructures, from the appearance of flat bands in twisted bilayer graphene to Wigner crystallization in transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs). However, t... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:38:51 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Kumar",
"Pankaj",
""
],
[
"Bosman",
"Michel",
""
],
[
"Lavrentev",
"Nikolai",
""
],
[
"Zheng",
"He",
""
],
[
"Peng",
"Ding",
""
],
[
"Novoselov",
"Kostya S.",
""
],
[
"Latychevskaia",
"Tatiana",
""
]
] | null |
2606.31935 | 2606.31935 | Yukun Zhang | Yukun Zhang, Kemu Xu | Delegation Rights: Property, Agency, and Investment Incentives in the Age of AI Agents | null | null | null | null | econ.EM | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | AI agents increasingly operate inside digital accounts by exercising privileges that users already hold, raising a new control question: whether an existing account entitlement must be exercised manually or may be exercised through a user-authorized automated proxy. We define \emph{delegation rights} as the revocable, ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:39:04 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Zhang",
"Yukun",
""
],
[
"Xu",
"Kemu",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: duandli.bib
================================================
@inproceedings{du_legal_2025,
location = {Singapore},
title = {Legal Regulation of Knowledge Distillation: From a Trade Secret Perspective},
isbn = {978-981-96-7071-0},
abstract = {With the rapid dev... |
2606.31936 | 2606.31936 | Demian Pouzo | Mengsi Gao and Demian Pouzo | Coupling and Maximal Inequalities for Graph-Dependent Empirical Processes | null | null | null | null | math.PR econ.EM math.ST stat.TH | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | We develop maximal inequalities for empirical processes indexed by graph-dependent observations. Our bounds separate the complexity of the indexing class from two features specific to graph dependence: the geometry of the underlying graph and the cost of coupling graph-separated blocks to independent copies. The coupli... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:42:30 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Gao",
"Mengsi",
""
],
[
"Pouzo",
"Demian",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: CoupleNetworks.bib
================================================
@article{DudleyPhilipp1983,
author = {Dudley, Richard M. and Philipp, Walter},
title = {Invariance Principles for Sums of {B}anach Space Valued Random Elements and Empirical Processes},
journ... |
2606.31937 | 2606.31937 | Wen Yin | Daiki Aburatani, Wakutaka Nakano and Wen Yin | PBHs and GWs from Scaling Monopoles | 34pages, 10figures, 1table, comments are welcome | null | null | null | hep-ph astro-ph.CO gr-qc | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Monopoles with sufficiently weak gauge couplings, or from global symmetries, can form scaling networks in the early Universe whose average energy density tracks the cosmological background. In this work, we find, by performing classical lattice simulations to estimate the overdensities, that primordial black holes (PBH... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:42:59 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Aburatani",
"Daiki",
""
],
[
"Nakano",
"Wakutaka",
""
],
[
"Yin",
"Wen",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: monopolePBH1.bbl
================================================
%merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked
%Control: key (0)
%Control: author (8) initials jnrlst
%Control: editor formatted (1) identically to author
%Control: production of ar... |
2606.31938 | 2606.31938 | Jos\'e Cano | Hubert Dymarkowski, Xingjian Fu, Rappy Saha, Jude Haris, Jos\'e Cano | FlexViT: A Flexible FPGA-based Accelerator for Edge Vision Transformers | Accepted to 36th International Conference on Field-Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL) 2026 | null | null | null | cs.AR cs.CV cs.DC cs.LG | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | Deploying Vision Transformer (ViT) models on edge platforms remains challenging due to their high computational demands and the architectural heterogeneity of modern hybrid ViT models, which incorporate both fully connected and convolutional layers. This heterogeneity leads to significant variation in tensor shapes, re... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:43:02 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Dymarkowski",
"Hubert",
""
],
[
"Fu",
"Xingjian",
""
],
[
"Saha",
"Rappy",
""
],
[
"Haris",
"Jude",
""
],
[
"Cano",
"José",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: 0_Main.tex
================================================
\documentclass[conference]{IEEEtran}
%% Packages
%% Added amsmath, amssymb, and amsfonts as IEEEtran does not auto-load them
\usepackage{amsmath, amssymb, amsfonts}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{makece... |
2606.31939 | 2606.31939 | Alex Drlica-Wagner | Alex Drlica-Wagner, Alessio Taranto, Gabriele Rodeghiero, Joshua E. Meyers, John Andrew, Douglas R. Neill, Christian Aguilar, Brian Stalder, Robert H. Lupton, Aashay Pai, Lee S. Kelvin, Aaron E. Watkins, Luca Rosignoli, Hannah M. M. Pollek, Anastasia Alexov | Investigation and Mitigation of a Prominent Off-Axis Stray Light Path in Rubin Observatory Commissioning | 10 pages, 7 figures, 2 tables; Proc. SPIE | null | null | FERMILAB-CONF-26-0417-PPD | astro-ph.IM astro-ph.CO | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | The "scratched tape" stray light feature is the most prominent and prevalent stray light artifact identified during the commissioning of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory. The scratched tape feature originates when light from large off-axis angles (~20 deg) passes between the mid-level and center-section light baffles, ref... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:44:38 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Drlica-Wagner",
"Alex",
""
],
[
"Taranto",
"Alessio",
""
],
[
"Rodeghiero",
"Gabriele",
""
],
[
"Meyers",
"Joshua E.",
""
],
[
"Andrew",
"John",
""
],
[
"Neill",
"Douglas R.",
""
],
[
"Aguilar",
"Christian",
... | ================================================
FILE: aas_macros.sty
================================================
%
% These Macros are taken from the AAS TeX macro package version 5.2
% and are compatible with the macros in the A&A document class
% version 7.0
% Include this file in your LaTeX source only if y... |
2606.31940 | 2606.31940 | Joseph Muller | Joseph Muller | EKOR and BT stratifications for basic unramified $\mathrm{GU}(1,n-1)$ Rapoport-Zink spaces | 73 pages | null | null | null | math.NT | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | In this paper, we establish the relation between the Ekedahl-Kottwitz-Oort-Rapoport stratification and the Bruhat-Tits stratification on the unramified $\mathrm{GU}(1,n-1)$ Rapoport-Zink space with arbitrary parahoric level. More precisely, we prove that every basic EKOR stratum is a disjoint union of copies of a fine ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:45:00 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Muller",
"Joseph",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: arbitraryparahoric.tex
================================================
\documentclass[12pt]{amsart}
%useful packages-----------------------------------------
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{mathdots}
\usepackage{... |
2606.31941 | 2606.31941 | Felipe Tommaselli | Felipe Tommaselli, Francisco Affonso, Arthur Pompeu, Gianluca Capezzuto, Arun Narenthiran Sivakumar, Girish Chowdhary, Marcelo Becker | LeCropFollow: Latent Space Planning for Navigation in Unstructured Crop Fields | 8 pages, 7 figures, 3 tables. Github Repo: https://github.com/Felipe-Tommaselli/lecropfollow | IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2026 | null | null | cs.RO cs.AI | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Unstructured navigational features, such as irregular planting or discontinuities, remain the primary failure mode for under-canopy agricultural robots. Existing geometric approaches often fail in these scenarios because they compress high-dimensional visual data into deterministic spatial references, effectively disca... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:47:08 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Tommaselli",
"Felipe",
""
],
[
"Affonso",
"Francisco",
""
],
[
"Pompeu",
"Arthur",
""
],
[
"Capezzuto",
"Gianluca",
""
],
[
"Sivakumar",
"Arun Narenthiran",
""
],
[
"Chowdhary",
"Girish",
""
],
[
"Becker",
"Ma... | ================================================
FILE: IEEEtran.cls
================================================
%%
%% IEEEtran.cls 2015/08/26 version V1.8b
%%
%% This is the IEEEtran LaTeX class for authors of the Institute of
%% Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Transactions journals and
%% conference... |
2606.31942 | 2606.31942 | Ulysse Marquis | Ulysse Marquis | Invasion with size-dependent dispersion range | 8 pages, 6 figures | null | null | null | q-bio.PE cond-mat.stat-mech | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | The coalescing colony model provides a minimal framework for biological invasions with long-range dispersion. In its standard formulation, the dispersion range is assumed independent of the size of the invading population. Here, we relax this assumption and consider size-dependent dispersal: a main colony of linear siz... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:48:02 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Marquis",
"Ulysse",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: biblio_ulysse.bib
================================================
@misc{marquis2026dynamicscalingrareevents,
title={Beyond dynamic scaling: rare events break universality},
author={Ulysse Marquis and Riccardo Gallotti and Marc Barthelemy},
y... |
2606.31943 | 2606.31943 | Max Whitton | Max Whitton, Zecheng Wang, Puchen Liu, Quang Tuan Truong, Shengao Wang, Manaswi Yadamreddy, Oktay Ozel, Visista Jayanti, Saniya Sekhon, Hanna Samuel Tadesse, Lawrence Miao, Junjie Wang, Jiasen Lu, Chen Yu, Boqing Gong | Making Sense of Touch from the Child's View for Contrastive Learning | null | null | null | null | cs.LG | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Is the sense of touch a mechanism for human babies' learning of visual concepts? If so, can we quantify its importance, and to what extent do babies rely on their sense of touch for visual learning? To approach these questions in a principled way, we propose a structured coding system for baby-centric touch events, yie... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:50:53 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Whitton",
"Max",
""
],
[
"Wang",
"Zecheng",
""
],
[
"Liu",
"Puchen",
""
],
[
"Truong",
"Quang Tuan",
""
],
[
"Wang",
"Shengao",
""
],
[
"Yadamreddy",
"Manaswi",
""
],
[
"Ozel",
"Oktay",
""
],
[
"Ja... | ================================================
FILE: abstract.tex
================================================
\begin{abstract}
Is the sense of touch a mechanism for human babies' learning of visual concepts? If so, can we quantify its importance, and to what extent do babies rely on their sense of touch for visu... |
2606.31944 | 2606.31944 | Jacob Zavatone-Veth | Jacob A. Zavatone-Veth | Stationary covariance spectra of discrete-time non-normal random recurrent dynamics | 12 pages, 3 figures | null | null | null | q-bio.NC cond-mat.dis-nn | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Principal component analysis is widely used to characterize structure in the dynamics of recurrent neural networks. For stationary noise-driven dynamics, the distribution of variance among the principal components is determined by the spectrum of the stationary covariance matrix. While the spectral properties of this m... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:51:36 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Zavatone-Veth",
"Jacob A.",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: main.tex
================================================
\documentclass[aps,pre,reprint,twocolumn,groupedaddress,nofootinbib]{revtex4-2}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{bm}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\use... |
2606.31945 | 2606.31945 | Gabriele Rodeghiero Dr | Gabriele Rodeghiero, Alex Drlica-Wagner, Alessio Taranto, Luca Rosignoli, Hannah Pollek, Aashay Pai, Lynne Jones, Erin Howard, Sean MacBride, John Andrew, Douglas Neill, Travis Lange, Andrew Rasmussen, Aaron Roodman, Brian Johnson, Elana Urbach, Parker Fragelius, Eli Rykoff, Tomislav Vucina, Christopher Stubbs, Robert ... | An overview of stray light findings and interpretation during on-sky commissioning of LSSTCam | null | null | null | null | astro-ph.IM | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Wide-field telescopes are intrinsically difficult to shield from unwanted stray and scattered light, while the search to identify sources of contaminating light is frequently a challenging task. The Vera C.~Rubin Observatory, which achieved its first photon with the LSST Camera (LSSTCam) on April 15, 2025, will initiat... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:52:41 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Rodeghiero",
"Gabriele",
""
],
[
"Drlica-Wagner",
"Alex",
""
],
[
"Taranto",
"Alessio",
""
],
[
"Rosignoli",
"Luca",
""
],
[
"Pollek",
"Hannah",
""
],
[
"Pai",
"Aashay",
""
],
[
"Jones",
"Lynne",
""
],
... | ================================================
FILE: main.tex
================================================
\documentclass[]{spie} %>>> use for US letter paper
%\documentclass[a4paper]{spie} %>>> use this instead for A4 paper
%\documentclass[nocompress]{spie} %>>> to avoid compression of citations
\renewcomman... |
2606.31946 | 2606.31946 | Ye Chen | Ye Chen, Xuanhong Chen, Yupeng Zhu, Liming Tan, Zhewen Wan, Yuxuan Xiong, Tielong Wang, Jinfan Liu, Wuze Zhang, Xiongzhen Zhang, Feifei Li, Xianglin Luo, Zhehan Zhao, Zhifan Zhang, Laisheng Kou, Zhujing Liang, Yugang Chen, Muchun Chen, Xu Miao, Yijing Zhang, Xiaojie Sheng, Qiang Hu, Jialiang Chen, Weimin Zhang, Wenjun ... | World Narrative Model for Highly Controllable Video Generation: A Paradigm Shift from Pixel Sampling to Physical World Orchestration | null | null | null | null | cs.CV | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | The fundamental obstacle to industrial grade video generation is the lack of controllability: existing models treat video as a pixel distribution sampling problem, bypassing the explicit, instance level $4D$ $(3D + T)$ physical world. Consequently, content creators cannot specify geometry, motion, camera parameters, or... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:52:53 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Chen",
"Ye",
""
],
[
"Chen",
"Xuanhong",
""
],
[
"Zhu",
"Yupeng",
""
],
[
"Tan",
"Liming",
""
],
[
"Wan",
"Zhewen",
""
],
[
"Xiong",
"Yuxuan",
""
],
[
"Wang",
"Tielong",
""
],
[
"Liu",
"Jinfan"... | ================================================
FILE: IEEEtran.cls
================================================
%%
%% IEEEtran.cls 2015/08/26 version V1.8b
%%
%% This is the IEEEtran LaTeX class for authors of the Institute of
%% Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Transactions journals and
%% conference... |
2606.31947 | 2606.31947 | Nina Hosseini-Kivanani | Nina Hosseini-Kivanani and Sandipana Dowerah | LuxEmo: Expressive Text-to-Speech Corpus for Luxembourgish | 7 pages, 4 figures, under review | null | null | null | cs.CL | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | State-of-the-art speech datasets predominantly focus on widely spoken languages, often overlooking low-resource languages such as Luxembourgish, which remain underrepresented in speech technology research. In this work, we introduce LuxEmo, a 21-hour conversational expressive speech corpus for Luxembourgish with 4 emot... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:53:15 GMT"
},
{
"version": "v2",
"created": "Thu, 02 Jul 2026 16:10:55 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-03 | [
[
"Hosseini-Kivanani",
"Nina",
""
],
[
"Dowerah",
"Sandipana",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: IEEEtran.cls
================================================
%%
%% IEEEtran.cls 2015/08/26 version V1.8b
%%
%% This is the IEEEtran LaTeX class for authors of the Institute of
%% Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Transactions journals and
%% conference... |
2606.31948 | 2606.31948 | Louis Petit | Louis Petit, Alexis Lussier Desbiens | RRT-Rope: A deterministic shortening approach for fast near-optimal path planning in large-scale uncluttered 3D environments | 8 pages, accepted at the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Melbourne, Australia | 2021 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Melbourne, Australia, 2021, pp. 1111-1118 | 10.1109/SMC52423.2021.9659071 | null | cs.RO | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Many path planning algorithms have been introduced so far, but most are costly, in path cost and in processing time, in large-scale uncluttered 3D environments such as underground mining stopes explored by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Rapidly-exploring Random Tree (RRT) algorithms are popular because of their prob... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:54:00 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Petit",
"Louis",
""
],
[
"Desbiens",
"Alexis Lussier",
""
]
] | null |
2606.31949 | 2606.31949 | Joana Cirici | Joana Cirici and Geoffroy Horel | On the l-adic homotopy type of configuration spaces | null | null | null | null | math.AT | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | We give algebraic models for the tame homotopy type of the configuration spaces of certain algebraic varieties of Tate type. Such tame models carry information on the l-adic homotopy type. Our method uses the theory of weights in \'etale cohomology, and also produces models for more general arrangement complements, bot... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:54:23 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Cirici",
"Joana",
""
],
[
"Horel",
"Geoffroy",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: Tame_etale5.bbl
================================================
\providecommand{\bysame}{\leavevmode\hbox to3em{\hrulefill}\thinspace}
\providecommand{\MR}{\relax\ifhmode\unskip\space\fi MR }
% \MRhref is called by the amsart/book/proc definition of \MR.
\providec... |
2606.31950 | 2606.31950 | Neil Matson | Aruna Jayarajan, N. Cameron Matson, Karthikeyan Sundaresan | LEO Satellite Network Orchestration with Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks | null | null | null | null | cs.NI | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellations are becoming essential for expanding global Internet access, especially in remote and under-served areas. However, their highly dynamic nature, arising from network mobility, introduces complex coordination challenges between the dynamic satellites and the ground nodes (ga... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:55:45 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Jayarajan",
"Aruna",
""
],
[
"Matson",
"N. Cameron",
""
],
[
"Sundaresan",
"Karthikeyan",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: 01_abstract.tex
================================================
\begin{abstract}
Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellations are becoming essential for expanding global Internet access, especially in remote and under-served areas.
However, their highly dynamic... |
2606.31951 | 2606.31951 | Lixin Shen | Lixin Shen and Jiangyu Yu | Explicit Series and a Certified Hybrid Evaluator for the $\ell_p$ Proximity Operator for $0<p<1$ | 1 | null | null | null | math.OC | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | The nonconvex $\ell_p$ quasi-norm with $0<p<1$ is a powerful sparsity surrogate but makes the proximity operator $\mathrm{prox}_{\lambda|\cdot|^p}$ nontrivial to evaluate robustly. We give an explicit characterization of the scalar proximal map for all $0<p<1$, including the threshold structure and conditions ensuring ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:56:17 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Shen",
"Lixin",
""
],
[
"Yu",
"Jiangyu",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: Exact-Lp.tex
================================================
%\documentclass[a4paper,fleqn,longmktitle]{cas-sc}
%\documentclass[a4paper,fleqn]{cas-sc}
\documentclass{amsart}
\usepackage{bbm}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{indentfirst,la... |
2606.31952 | 2606.31952 | Daniel Spencer | Daniel J. Spencer, Kishor Bharti, Alexey V. Gorshkov | An efficient Pauli decomposition algorithm for structured matrices | 27 pages, 3 figures, 1 table | null | null | null | quant-ph | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Decomposing classical matrices into linear combinations of Pauli strings is a major bottleneck for end-to-end implementations of near-term quantum algorithms. In this work, we consider a promise version of this Pauli decomposition problem in which the matrix is guaranteed to have support on only $k = \mathsf{poly}(n)$ ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:57:07 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Spencer",
"Daniel J.",
""
],
[
"Bharti",
"Kishor",
""
],
[
"Gorshkov",
"Alexey V.",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: main.tex
================================================
\documentclass{revtex-stylesheet}
\begin{document}
\title{An efficient Pauli decomposition algorithm for structured matrices}
\author{Daniel J. Spencer}
\email{djspence@umd.edu}
\affiliation{Joint Center f... |
2606.31953 | 2606.31953 | Bruno Le Floch | Bruno Le Floch | Convergence of Nekrasov instanton sum for unitary quivers | 25 pages | null | null | null | hep-th | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | The convergence radius of Nekrasov partition functions (as a function of instanton counting parameters) is shown to be positive for 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ quiver gauge theories with unitary gauge groups in an open dense subset of parameters. For $U(N)$ SQCD this is established if the ratio of equivariant parameters $b^2=\e... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:57:18 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Floch",
"Bruno Le",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: ZinstRadius.bib
================================================
@article{hep-th/9407087,
author = "Seiberg, Nathan and Witten, Edward",
title = "Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in {N=2} supersymmetric {Y}ang-{M}ills theo... |
2606.31954 | 2606.31954 | Jiajun Liu | Jiajun Liu, Ke Zhu, Xiaofei Wang | A Conformal Selection Framework for Individual Treatment Beneficiaries with Auxiliary External Data | null | null | null | null | stat.ME | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Identifying patients who are likely to benefit from a treatment is central to precision medicine and can guide follow-up trials, enrichment designs, and individualized decisions. Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide evidence on efficacy, they are usually powered to estimate average treatment effects rat... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:58:16 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Liu",
"Jiajun",
""
],
[
"Zhu",
"Ke",
""
],
[
"Wang",
"Xiaofei",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: __abstract.tex
================================================
Identifying patients who are likely to benefit from a treatment is an important goal in precision medicine and can help guide follow-up trials, enrichment designs, and individualized treatment decision... |
2606.31955 | 2606.31955 | Daniela Bubboloni | Daniela Bubboloni, Stefano Moretti | Comparison games and ranking of players | null | null | null | null | econ.TH | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | This work addresses the problem of assessing player importance in coalitional settings where the available information concerns the relative strength between pairs of coalitions, rather than the absolute worth of each coalition. We introduce a novel framework that is flexible enough to represent all coalitional pseudo-... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:58:22 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Bubboloni",
"Daniela",
""
],
[
"Moretti",
"Stefano",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: main_130626.tex
================================================
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[a4paper,margin=1in,footskip=0.25in]{geometry}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{graphicx}%
\usepackage{multirow}%
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts}%
\usep... |
2606.31956 | 2606.31956 | Jan Haji\v{c} Jr | Vojt\v{e}ch Dvo\v{r}\'ak, Filip B\'im, Ji\v{r}\'i Mayer, Martina Dvo\v{r}\'akov\'a, Mark\'eta Herzanov\'a Vlkov\'a, Pavel Pecina, Petr \v{Z}abi\v{c}ka, Jan Haji\v{c} jr | DEMUN: Fast and accurate discovery of music notation in very large collections | null | null | null | null | cs.DL cs.CV | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Much of written musical heritage is preserved and digitised at memory institutions: libraries, museums, and archives. Owing to their collection structures, sheet music tends to be concentrated in large subsets that are defined as collections of music, with corresponding metadata that makes the music findable. However, ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:59:09 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Dvořák",
"Vojtěch",
""
],
[
"Bím",
"Filip",
""
],
[
"Mayer",
"Jiří",
""
],
[
"Dvořáková",
"Martina",
""
],
[
"Vlková",
"Markéta Herzanová",
""
],
[
"Pecina",
"Pavel",
""
],
[
"Žabička",
"Petr",
""
],
[... | ================================================
FILE: bibliography.bib
================================================
@inproceedings{baroHandwrittenHistoricalMusic2020,
title = {Handwritten {{Historical Music Recognition}} by {{Sequence-to-Sequence}} with {{Attention Mechanism}}},
booktitle = {2020 17th {{Intern... |
2606.31957 | 2606.31957 | Mikael Kuusela | Thea Sukianto, Mikael Kuusela, Donata Giglio, Anirban Mondal, Pulong Ma, Douglas W. Nychka | Locally stationary Argo ocean heat content estimates: Modeling, validation and uncertainty quantification | 52 pages, 27 figures | null | null | null | stat.AP physics.ao-ph stat.ME | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Argo profiling floats measure seawater temperature and salinity in the upper 2000 meters of the ocean. These floats are uniquely capable of measuring the global Ocean Heat Content (OHC), a quantity that is of central importance for understanding Earth Energy Imbalance. Yet, producing Argo-based OHC estimates with relia... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:59:11 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Sukianto",
"Thea",
""
],
[
"Kuusela",
"Mikael",
""
],
[
"Giglio",
"Donata",
""
],
[
"Mondal",
"Anirban",
""
],
[
"Ma",
"Pulong",
""
],
[
"Nychka",
"Douglas W.",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: OHC_paper.bbl
================================================
\begin{thebibliography}{88}
\providecommand{\natexlab}[1]{#1}
\providecommand{\url}[1]{\texttt{#1}}
\renewcommand{\UrlFont}{\rmfamily}
\providecommand{\urlprefix}{URL }
\expandafter\ifx\csname urlstyle\... |
2606.31958 | 2606.31958 | Jagdeep Singh Bhatia | Jagdeep Singh Bhatia, Andrew Wagenmaker, William Chen, Sergey Levine | Adapting Generalist Robot Policies with Semantic Reinforcement Learning | Website: https://semantic-action-rl.github.io/ | null | null | null | cs.RO | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Generalist robot policies learn a diverse repertoire of behaviors from large-scale pretraining. In principle, this makes them excellent priors for downstream adaptation via reinforcement learning (RL). In practice, however, standard RL methods leveraging this prior optimize directly over robot actions, requiring the ba... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:00:33 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Bhatia",
"Jagdeep Singh",
""
],
[
"Wagenmaker",
"Andrew",
""
],
[
"Chen",
"William",
""
],
[
"Levine",
"Sergey",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: appendix.tex
================================================
\clearpage
\section{Experimental Details}
\label{app:hyperparams}
\subsection{\method: In-practice Optimizations}
We make three optimizations to Algorithm~\ref{alg:main} presented in Section~\ref{subsec... |
2606.31959 | 2606.31959 | Xinyu Hou | Xinyu Hou, Xiaoming Li, Zongsheng Yue, Chen Change Loy | AnyBokeh: Physics-Guided Any-to-Any Bokeh Editing with Optical Fingerprint Transfer | null | null | null | null | cs.CV | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Depth-of-field control is a fundamental tool in photography, yet post-capture bokeh editing from a single image remains challenging. A practical editor should handle images captured under arbitrary focus and aperture settings. Existing methods typically assume an all-in-focus input, or first recover an all-in-focus ima... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:01:28 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Hou",
"Xinyu",
""
],
[
"Li",
"Xiaoming",
""
],
[
"Yue",
"Zongsheng",
""
],
[
"Loy",
"Chen Change",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: main.bbl
================================================
\begin{thebibliography}{44}
\providecommand{\natexlab}[1]{#1}
\providecommand{\url}[1]{\texttt{#1}}
\expandafter\ifx\csname urlstyle\endcsname\relax
\providecommand{\doi}[1]{doi: #1}\else
\providecommand... |
2606.31960 | 2606.31960 | Saili Keshri | Saili Keshri, Sudhanshu Barway, Mousumi Das and Abhishek Paswan | Caught in the act: interaction-driven evolution in the nearby compact galaxy group Roberts Quartet (SCG0018-4854) | 18 pages, 18 figures, accepted for publication in A&A (comments are welcome) | null | null | null | astro-ph.GA | http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | We present a spatially resolved multiwavelength study of the compact galaxy group Roberts Quartet (RQ, SCG0018-4854), aimed at understanding interaction-driven galaxy evolution in a dense environment. RQ comprises of four galaxies (NGC 87, NGC 88, NGC 89, and NGC 92) that span a range of masses and evolutionary states.... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:01:41 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Keshri",
"Saili",
""
],
[
"Barway",
"Sudhanshu",
""
],
[
"Das",
"Mousumi",
""
],
[
"Paswan",
"Abhishek",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: Reference.bib
================================================
@article{Bacon2010,
author = {Bacon, R. and Accardo, M. and Adjali, L. and Anwand, H. and Bauer, S. M. and Biswas, I. and Blaizot, J. and Boudon, D. and Brau-Nogue, S. and Caillier, P. and others},
... |
2606.31961 | 2606.31961 | Haonan Zhang | Paata Ivanisvili, Xinyuan Xie, Haonan Zhang | A Beckmann boundary form of Talagrand's conjecture on the discrete cube | 35 pages, 1 figure | null | null | null | math.CA math.FA math.PR | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | We introduce the Beckmann boundary of a Boolean function \[
\mathsf{B}(f)=\inf_{\operatorname{div} V=Lf}\mathbb E\|V(x)\|_2. \] Here \[
L=\sum_iD_i,\qquad D_i f(x)=\frac{f(x)-f(x^{\oplus i})}{2}, \] and $\operatorname{div} V(x)=\sum_i (V_{i}(x)-V_{i}(x^{\oplus i}))$. This nonlocal quantity is no larger than the usu... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:02:21 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Ivanisvili",
"Paata",
""
],
[
"Xie",
"Xinyuan",
""
],
[
"Zhang",
"Haonan",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: beckmann_arxiv_v1.tex
================================================
\documentclass[11pt]{amsart}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm,mathtools}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\usepackage{microtype}
\usepackage{graphicx... |
2606.31962 | 2606.31962 | Ziqi Ye | Ziqi Ye, Yinghui He, Weiwei Chen, Guanding Yu, Rui Zhang | Toward Efficient Sensing in Multi-Device ISCC by Removing Frequency Domain Redundancy | 6 pages, 9 figures | null | null | null | eess.SP | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Integrated sensing, communication, and computation (ISCC) is envisioned as a key enabler for intelligent services in future wireless networks. However, in multi-device ISCC systems, directly offloading full orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) sensing data to the edge may incur excessive overhead, thereby ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:02:32 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Ye",
"Ziqi",
""
],
[
"He",
"Yinghui",
""
],
[
"Chen",
"Weiwei",
""
],
[
"Yu",
"Guanding",
""
],
[
"Zhang",
"Rui",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: IEEEtran.cls
================================================
%%
%% IEEEtran.cls 2015/08/26 version V1.8b
%%
%% This is the IEEEtran LaTeX class for authors of the Institute of
%% Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Transactions journals and
%% conference... |
2606.31963 | 2606.31963 | John Sweeney | John Sweeney | Signed-Permutation Coordinate Transport for RMSNorm Transformers | 31 pages, 2 figures, 26 tables | null | null | null | cs.LG cs.CL stat.ML | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Modern LLM workflows move coordinate-indexed objects across checkpoints: steering vectors, sparse autoencoders, top-$k$ neuron sets, attribution lists, and merge alignments. This is only well posed after fixing the model's residual-stream gauge, which we show is architecture-dependent: LayerNorm residual charts have pe... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:02:33 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Sweeney",
"John",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: main.tex
================================================
\documentclass{article}
% Official NeurIPS 2026 style. Use preprint for arXiv/non-anonymous public drafts.
\usepackage[preprint]{neurips_2026}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepack... |
2606.31964 | 2606.31964 | Zewei Kong | Zewei Kong, Paul A. Parker, Scott H. Holan | Scalable Joint Modeling of Dependent Multi-Type Survey Data for Small Area Estimation | 27 pages, 3 figures | null | null | null | stat.ME stat.AP | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | We develop a Bayesian area-level small area estimation framework that jointly models binomial and Gaussian survey responses through shared spatial random effects. This work is motivated by the American Community Survey (ACS), which provides useful information that contributes to federal funding and policy making decisi... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:03:34 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Kong",
"Zewei",
""
],
[
"Parker",
"Paul A.",
""
],
[
"Holan",
"Scott H.",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: bghm.bib
================================================
@article{chen2014use,
title={The use of sampling weights in Bayesian hierarchical models for small area estimation},
author={Chen, Cici and Wakefield, Jon and Lumely, Thomas},
journal={Spatial and spat... |
2606.31965 | 2606.31965 | Colin Alstad | Colin Alstad, Timothy Duff, Mordechai Katzman | Segre-Determinantal Loci and the Image Variety for Three Flatland Cameras | 16 pages | null | null | null | math.AG math.AC | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Motivated by applications of algebraic geometry to reconstruction problems in computer vision, we initiate a study of the equations of degeneracy loci associated with linearly dependent points on Segre varieties. When these points are constrained to lie on a common hyperplane, we prove that the vanishing ideals of thes... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:05:55 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Alstad",
"Colin",
""
],
[
"Duff",
"Timothy",
""
],
[
"Katzman",
"Mordechai",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: conm-p-l.cls
================================================
%%
%% This is file `conm-p-l.cls',
%% generated with the docstrip utility.
%%
%% The original source files were:
%%
%% e-proc.dtx (with options: `cls,conmCls')
%% This is a generated file.
%%
%% Copyri... |
2606.31966 | 2606.31966 | Qingyun Liu | Qingyun Liu, Jiwen Zhang, Jingyi Hu, Siyuan Wang, Zhongyu Wei | MECoBench: A Systematic Study of Multimodal Agent Collaboration in Embodied Environments | Project website: https://q-i-n-g.github.io/MECoBench-Website/ | null | null | null | cs.MA cs.AI cs.CL cs.CV | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have strong potential as embodied agents, but their ability to collaborate in visually grounded environments remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce MECoBench, a multimodal embodied cooperation benchmark with an evaluation platform spanning diverse real-w... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:07:53 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Liu",
"Qingyun",
""
],
[
"Zhang",
"Jiwen",
""
],
[
"Hu",
"Jingyi",
""
],
[
"Wang",
"Siyuan",
""
],
[
"Wei",
"Zhongyu",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: acl.sty
================================================
% This is the LaTex style file for *ACL.
% The official sources can be found at
%
% https://github.com/acl-org/acl-style-files/
%
% This package is activated by adding
%
% \usepackage{acl}
%
% to your ... |
2606.31967 | 2606.31967 | Tianhen Wang | Jie Ma, Tianhen Wang and Tianming Zhu | On clique-to-clique densities | 14 pages, 1 figure | null | null | null | math.CO | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Let $k_r(G)$ denote the number of $r$-cliques in a graph $G$ and let $F_r(\cdot)$ be the Lov\'asz--Simonovits $r$-clique density function. For any integers $2\le s<t$, we determine the asymptotically sharp lower bound on $k_t(G)$ in an $n$-vertex graph $G$ with a prescribed number $k_s(G)$, by showing that \[ \frac{k_t... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:10:55 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Ma",
"Jie",
""
],
[
"Wang",
"Tianhen",
""
],
[
"Zhu",
"Tianming",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: main.tex
================================================
\documentclass[a4paper,10pt]{article}
\pdfoutput=1 %for arxiv
\oddsidemargin 0pt
\evensidemargin 0pt
\marginparwidth 40pt
\topmargin 0pt
\tolerance=1000
\usepackage{geometry}
\geometry{a4paper, left=2cm, ... |
2606.31968 | 2606.31968 | Aman Patel | Aman Patel, Mohmedmunavvar Mubarak Bapu, and Mrinmay Biswas | Approximate Controllability of the generalized Burgers-Huxley equation in one dimension | 48 pages, Comments Welcome! | null | null | null | math.OC math.AP | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | The generalized Burgers-Huxley (GBH) equation is a prototype model that describes the interplay among reaction, convection, and diffusion. In this article, we explore the controllability of this model by means of an interior control supported in an arbitrary non-empty open subset of the domain. We establish that the GB... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:11:08 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Patel",
"Aman",
""
],
[
"Bapu",
"Mohmedmunavvar Mubarak",
""
],
[
"Biswas",
"Mrinmay",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: V_8_28_06_26.tex
================================================
\documentclass[11pt]{amsart}
\usepackage{amsthm, amsfonts, amsmath, amssymb}
\usepackage{dsfont}
\allowdisplaybreaks
\usepackage[all,cmtip]{xy}
\usepackage{tkz-euclide}
\usepackage{tikz-cd}
%\usepac... |
2606.31969 | 2606.31969 | Marco Merkli | Alain Joye and Marco Merkli | The contact temperature of arbitrary quantum states | null | null | null | null | quant-ph math-ph math.MP | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | An intuitive scheme to assign a temperature to an arbitrary state of a quantum system is to investigate the heat flow resulting from the coupling to a thermometer. We introduce a simple model of a universal thermometer with the following property. When it is prepared in a Gibbs equilibrium state at inverse temperature ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:11:32 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Joye",
"Alain",
""
],
[
"Merkli",
"Marco",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: ThermoPaper-ArXiv-Version1.tex
================================================
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\setlength{\textwidth}{16cm}
\usepackage[margin=0.9in]{geometry}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{bm}
\usepackage{bbm}
\usepackage{stmaryrd}
\usepac... |
2606.31970 | 2606.31970 | Martin Bladt | Martin Bladt and Marcus Christiansen | Payment Process Estimation in Aggregated Insurance Models | null | null | null | null | stat.ME math.PR math.ST stat.TH | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Insurance payments may depend on latent micro states although only macro states and realized payments are observed. We study a sojourn-payment model for such aggregated multi-state systems under left-truncation and right-censoring. Starting from a micro-to-macro projection, we establish strong consistency and weak conv... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:11:55 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Bladt",
"Martin",
""
],
[
"Christiansen",
"Marcus",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: final.bbl
================================================
\begin{thebibliography}{}
\bibitem[Ahmad and Bladt, 2023]{AhmadBladt2023}
Ahmad, J. and Bladt, M. (2023).
\newblock Aggregate markov models in life insurance: estimation via the em
algorithm.
\bibitem[A... |
2606.31971 | 2606.31971 | Alessandro Botta | Alessandro Botta, Shiven Garisa, Jaya Vardhini Akurathi, Ahsanul Ameen Sabit, Trey Woodlief, Soneya Binta Hossain | CoCoMUT: A Tool for Code-Context Mining and Automated Dataset Generation | 5 pages, 1 figure. Submitted to ISSTA 2026 Tool Track | null | null | null | cs.SE | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Software-engineering assistants often need method-level context beyond an isolated body, including enclosing-class information, documentation, callers, callees, type hierarchy, and structural characteristics. Manually collecting this context is time-consuming, inconsistent, and difficult to reproduce across large Java ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:12:44 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Botta",
"Alessandro",
""
],
[
"Garisa",
"Shiven",
""
],
[
"Akurathi",
"Jaya Vardhini",
""
],
[
"Sabit",
"Ahsanul Ameen",
""
],
[
"Woodlief",
"Trey",
""
],
[
"Hossain",
"Soneya Binta",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: CoCoMUT.tex
================================================
\documentclass[sigconf]{acmart}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{listings}
\usepackage{xspace}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{balance}
\usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta,positioning,fit,ca... |
2606.31972 | 2606.31972 | Changming Huang | Changming Huang, Yan Wang, Pengcheng Liu, Qidong Fu, Liangwei Dong | Dissipative surface solitons in two-dimensional truncated lattices with linear gain and loss | 19 pages, 10 figures, to appear in Chaos,Solitons & Fractals | null | null | null | nlin.PS physics.optics | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Dissipative solitons constitute a robust class of self-localized nonlinear states sustained by the dynamic balance between nonlinearity and gain-loss, possessing an intrinsic stability that stems from their fundamental attractor nature. When combined with lattice truncation, this balance gives rise to dissipative surfa... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:12:50 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Huang",
"Changming",
""
],
[
"Wang",
"Yan",
""
],
[
"Liu",
"Pengcheng",
""
],
[
"Fu",
"Qidong",
""
],
[
"Dong",
"Liangwei",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: Surface_CSF_SI_v2.tex
================================================
\documentclass[10pt,superscriptaddress,onecolumn]{revtex4-2}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{bm}
\usepackage{changes}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
\usepackage{soul}
%\usepackage{xcolor}
% ... |
2606.31973 | 2606.31973 | Tugba Erpek | Yalin E. Sagduyu, Tugba Erpek, Aylin Yener, Sennur Ulukus | Semantic Leakage and Privacy Preservation in Relay-Assisted Semantic Communications | null | null | null | null | cs.NI cs.CR cs.IT cs.LG eess.SP math.IT | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Semantic communication (SemCom) has emerged as a promising paradigm in which the transmission of task-relevant information is prioritized over raw data, enabling efficient and robust communication under resource and channel constraints. In this paper, the privacy implications of relay-assisted SemCom systems are studie... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:15:23 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Sagduyu",
"Yalin E.",
""
],
[
"Erpek",
"Tugba",
""
],
[
"Yener",
"Aylin",
""
],
[
"Ulukus",
"Sennur",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: arxiv.tex
================================================
\documentclass[journal]{IEEEtran}
\bstctlcite{IEEEexample:BSTcontrol}
\usepackage{epsfig,rotating,setspace,latexsym,amsmath,epsf,amssymb,amsfonts,bm,theorem,cite,authblk, bbm,color, hyperref, multirow, ca... |
2606.31974 | 2606.31974 | Taylor J. Smith | Taylor J. Smith | Complexity of Universality and Related Decision Problems for Unary Two-Dimensional Automata | null | null | null | null | cs.FL cs.CC | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | A two-dimensional automaton is able to move its input head through its input word in four directions: upward, downward, leftward, and rightward. If we prevent the input head from moving upward, then we obtain a three-way two-dimensional automaton; preventing both upward and leftward movements results in a two-way two-d... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:15:26 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Smith",
"Taylor J.",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: References.bib
================================================
@inproceedings{
BlumHewitt19672DAutomata,
author = "Blum, Manuel and Hewitt, Carl",
title = "Automata on a 2-dimensional tape",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 8th Annual Symposium on Switching and... |
2606.31975 | 2606.31975 | Sarunas Verner | Ignatios Antoniadis, John Ellis, Dimitri V. Nanopoulos, Keith A. Olive, Sarunas Verner | Reheating in No-Scale Models of Inflation | 34 pages, 1 figure | null | null | UMN-TH-4533/26, FTPI-MINN-26/13, KCL-PH-TH/2026-19, CERN-TH-2026-154 | hep-ph astro-ph.CO hep-th | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Analogously to the suppression of inflaton decays into conformally-coupled scalar fields in the original Starobinsky $R + R^2$ model of inflation, inflaton decays to Standard Model fields are also suppressed in minimal no-scale models of inflation with field space curvature $\mathcal{R} = 2/3$. We study how this suppre... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:16:41 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Antoniadis",
"Ignatios",
""
],
[
"Ellis",
"John",
""
],
[
"Nanopoulos",
"Dimitri V.",
""
],
[
"Olive",
"Keith A.",
""
],
[
"Verner",
"Sarunas",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: jcappub.sty
================================================
%% jcappub.sty
%% Copyright 2015 SISSA Medialab
%
% This work may be distributed and/or modified under the
% conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3
% of this license or (at you... |
2606.31976 | 2606.31976 | Huiqi Wang | Shiyi Chen, Nicholas Saban, Collin Hargreaves, Huiqi Wang | TreeAgent: A Generalizable Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Bias Labeling in Forestry via Compiled Expert Rules and Vision-Language Models | 9 pages, 2 figures | null | null | null | cs.AI cs.MA | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Human-labeled data are widely used as reference annotations in ML, despite known variability across annotators in many expert-driven domains. In addition, expert annotation is slow, inconsistent, and remains a major bottleneck for scaling tasks like tree height bias classification in forestry remote sensing. We propose... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:16:59 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Chen",
"Shiyi",
""
],
[
"Saban",
"Nicholas",
""
],
[
"Hargreaves",
"Collin",
""
],
[
"Wang",
"Huiqi",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: algorithm.sty
================================================
% ALGORITHM STYLE -- Released 8 April 1996
% for LaTeX-2e
% Copyright -- 1994 Peter Williams
% E-mail Peter.Williams@dsto.defence.gov.au
\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
\ProvidesPackage{algorithm}
\typeout{... |
2606.31977 | 2606.31977 | Neel Shah | Neel Shah, Kazuya Koyama, Johannes Noller, Lanyang Yi | Constraining dark energy with complementary probes of large-scale structure | 19 pages + appendices and references, 14 figures | null | null | null | astro-ph.CO gr-qc | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | To observationally pin down the nature of dark energy, it is essential to consistently model cosmological perturbations in the presence of dark energy alongside the background expansion and constrain this joint theory space with a large array of complementary probes. Here, we achieve this by constraining a model in the... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:17:50 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-02 | [
[
"Shah",
"Neel",
""
],
[
"Koyama",
"Kazuya",
""
],
[
"Noller",
"Johannes",
""
],
[
"Yi",
"Lanyang",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: DESI_RSD_EFT.bib
================================================
@article{Stolzner:2017ged,
author = {St\"olzner, Benjamin and Cuoco, Alessandro and Lesgourgues, Julien and Bilicki, Maciej},
title = "{Updated tomographic analysis of the integrated Sachs-Wo... |
2606.31978 | 2606.31978 | Louise Paquereau | Louise Paquereau, Clotilde Laigle, Henry Joy McCracken, Olivier Ilbert, Hollis B. Akins, Rafael C. Arango-Togo, Nguyen Binh, Caitlin M. Casey, Yohan Dubois, Maximilien Franco, Ghassem Gozaliasl, Santosh Harish, Michaela Hirschmann, Baptiste Jego, Aidan Kaminsky, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Anton Koekemoer, Damien Le Borgne, ... | COSMOS-Web: does halo mass alone shape the clustering of star-forming and quiescent galaxies? | 12 pages, 8 figures. Submitted to A&A | null | null | null | astro-ph.GA | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | While stellar mass correlates strongly with halo mass, it remains unclear whether halo mass alone governs galaxy star-formation activity, or whether secondary halo properties and environment also play a role. We investigate these effects beyond halo mass by measuring the auto- and cross-correlations of star-forming and... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:18:25 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Paquereau",
"Louise",
""
],
[
"Laigle",
"Clotilde",
""
],
[
"McCracken",
"Henry Joy",
""
],
[
"Ilbert",
"Olivier",
""
],
[
"Akins",
"Hollis B.",
""
],
[
"Arango-Togo",
"Rafael C.",
""
],
[
"Binh",
"Nguyen",
... | ================================================
FILE: aa.cls
================================================
%%
%% This is file `aa.cls',
%% generated with the docstrip utility.
%%
%% The original source files were:
%%
%% aa.dtx (with options: `aa')
%%
%% aa.dtx
%% Copyright EDP Sciences (2024), J.-C. Charpentier (... |
2606.31979 | 2606.31979 | Gabi Pragier | Gabi Pragier, Matan Karklinsky, David Ungarish, Avi Ben-Cohen | Planar-SfM: Camera Pose Estimation via Homography Graph Embeddings | Accepted at ICPR 2026 | null | null | null | cs.CV | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Structure from Motion (SfM) systems traditionally struggle with planar scenes, where standard epipolar geometry-based methods become degenerate. Rather than viewing planar surfaces as a limitation, we propose a unified framework that leverages them as a source of geometric constraints. Our key insight is that each plan... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:18:27 GMT"
},
{
"version": "v2",
"created": "Wed, 01 Jul 2026 07:10:37 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-02 | [
[
"Pragier",
"Gabi",
""
],
[
"Karklinsky",
"Matan",
""
],
[
"Ungarish",
"David",
""
],
[
"Ben-Cohen",
"Avi",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: llncs.cls
================================================
% LLNCS DOCUMENT CLASS -- version 2.22 (05-Sep-2022)
% Springer Verlag LaTeX2e support for Lecture Notes in Computer Science
%
%%
%% \CharacterTable
%% {Upper-case \A\B\C\D\E\F\G\H\I\J\K\L\M\N\O\P\Q\R\S... |
2606.31980 | 2606.31980 | Meng Chen | Meng Chen, Anya Ji, Tsung-Han Wu, Tobias Maringgele, David M. Chan, Alane Suhr, Amy Pavel | DigitalCoach: Communication and Grounding Gaps in Human and Agentic Computer Use Coaching | null | null | null | null | cs.CL cs.AI cs.HC | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Agents are increasingly capable of automating software tasks, but can they teach humans how to use software themselves? We introduce DigitalCoach, a multimodal dataset of 72 human expert-novice computer use coaching sessions consisting of 22,752 dialogue turns grounded in 28.1 hours of screen and input event recordings... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:18:47 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-02 | [
[
"Chen",
"Meng",
""
],
[
"Ji",
"Anya",
""
],
[
"Wu",
"Tsung-Han",
""
],
[
"Maringgele",
"Tobias",
""
],
[
"Chan",
"David M.",
""
],
[
"Suhr",
"Alane",
""
],
[
"Pavel",
"Amy",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: acl.sty
================================================
% This is the LaTex style file for *ACL.
% The official sources can be found at
%
% https://github.com/acl-org/acl-style-files/
%
% This package is activated by adding
%
% \usepackage{acl}
%
% to your ... |
2606.31981 | 2606.31981 | Peng Li | Peng Li, Rawal Khirodkar, Junxuan Li, Yuan Dong, Chen Cao, Yuan Liu, Wenhan Luo, Yike Guo, Shunsuke Saito | LUNA: Learning Universal 3D Human Animation Beyond Skinning | ECCV 2026, Project page: https://penghtyx.github.io/LUNA/ | null | null | null | cs.CV cs.AI | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Creating photorealistic, animatable 3D human avatars from monocular images still largely depends on Linear Blend Skinning (LBS) and parametric body models, which constrain expressivity and often introduce artifacts due to imperfect fitting. We propose LUNA, an LBS-free universal neural animation model that directly map... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:19:55 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Li",
"Peng",
""
],
[
"Khirodkar",
"Rawal",
""
],
[
"Li",
"Junxuan",
""
],
[
"Dong",
"Yuan",
""
],
[
"Cao",
"Chen",
""
],
[
"Liu",
"Yuan",
""
],
[
"Luo",
"Wenhan",
""
],
[
"Guo",
"Yike",
""
... | ================================================
FILE: eccv.sty
================================================
% ---------------------------------------------------------------
%
% Formatting Package for ECCV Submissions
%
% initially created for ECCV 2024
% by Stefan Roth
%
% based on previous ECCV templates:
% u... |
2606.31982 | 2606.31982 | Haiwen Diao | Yuhao Wang, Mu Qiao, Haiwen Diao, Yunzhi Zhuge, Pingping Zhang, Xindong Zhang, Lei Zhang, Huchuan Lu | ERA: Entropy-Guided Visual Token Pruning with Rectified Attention for Efficient MLLMs | 17 pages, 7 figures | null | null | null | cs.CV | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) incur prohibitive inference costs due to long visual token sequences. Training-free visual token reduction provides an efficient solution. However, existing methods distort attention distributions, giving rise to a phenomenon we term Attention Logit Collapse. To address this iss... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:20:29 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Wang",
"Yuhao",
""
],
[
"Qiao",
"Mu",
""
],
[
"Diao",
"Haiwen",
""
],
[
"Zhuge",
"Yunzhi",
""
],
[
"Zhang",
"Pingping",
""
],
[
"Zhang",
"Xindong",
""
],
[
"Zhang",
"Lei",
""
],
[
"Lu",
"Huchua... | ================================================
FILE: IEEEtran.cls
================================================
%%
%% IEEEtran.cls 2015/08/26 version V1.8b
%%
%% This is the IEEEtran LaTeX class for authors of the Institute of
%% Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Transactions journals and
%% conference... |
2606.31983 | 2606.31983 | Fatemeh Ahmadi | Fatemeh Ahmadi, Tobias Bernhard, Mohamed Abdelmaksoud, Luca Zecchini, Tilmann Rabl, Ziawasch Abedjan | Clean Me If You Can: A Large Collection of Real-World Addresses for Data Cleaning Benchmarking | null | null | null | null | cs.DB | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | There has been extensive research on automating and scaling data cleaning, i.e., the detection and correction of erroneous values in tabular data. Yet, existing approaches often perform well only within controlled environments. One of the major bottlenecks in data cleaning research is the lack of real-world datasets. I... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:21:48 GMT"
},
{
"version": "v2",
"created": "Wed, 01 Jul 2026 07:13:51 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-02 | [
[
"Ahmadi",
"Fatemeh",
""
],
[
"Bernhard",
"Tobias",
""
],
[
"Abdelmaksoud",
"Mohamed",
""
],
[
"Zecchini",
"Luca",
""
],
[
"Rabl",
"Tilmann",
""
],
[
"Abedjan",
"Ziawasch",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: abbreviations.bib
================================================
% This file was created with JabRef 2.9.2.
% Encoding: Cp1252
@PREAMBLE{ {\providecommand{\noopsort}[1]{}} }
@STRING{AAAI = {Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence
(AAA... |
2606.31984 | 2606.31984 | Yufei Li | Yufei Li, Zaiwei Zhang, Mingfu Liang, Kavosh Asadi, Jay Xu, Jimmy Kim, Chongyang Bai, Jieyi Zhang, Hongye Xie, Prachi Agrawal, Dian Yu, Tianyi Chen, Jean-Pascal Billaud, Garret Buell, YK (Yongkang) Zhu, Sachin Patil, Brooke Bian, Zhou Fang, Kevin Huang, Shiva Sudanagunta, Yuzhen Huang, Emma Lu, Chris O'Brien, Yang Song... | GR2 Technical Report | 18 pages, 10 figures | null | null | null | cs.IR cs.AI | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | Industrial recommendation systems serve billions of users through a multi-stage funnel -- retrieval, early-stage ranking, and re-ranking -- where the final re-ranking step disproportionately shapes user engagement and downstream performance, particularly for carousel and grid display formats. Despite growing enthusiasm... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:22:22 GMT"
},
{
"version": "v2",
"created": "Wed, 01 Jul 2026 23:39:37 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-03 | [
[
"Li",
"Yufei",
"",
"Yongkang"
],
[
"Zhang",
"Zaiwei",
"",
"Yongkang"
],
[
"Liang",
"Mingfu",
"",
"Yongkang"
],
[
"Asadi",
"Kavosh",
"",
"Yongkang"
],
[
"Xu",
"Jay",
"",
"Yongkang"
],
[
"Kim",
"Jimmy",
"... | ================================================
FILE: fairmeta.cls
================================================
% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% A new style for FAIR pre-prints
% Author: dlp@meta.com
% Version: 1.1
% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%... |
2606.31985 | 2606.31985 | Zohar Nussinov | Giorgi Tsereteli and Zohar Nussinov | Non-Maxwellian Velocity Statistics in Supercooled Liquids and Their Possible Relation to Super-Arrhenius Viscosity | 29 pages, 18 figures | null | null | null | cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.soft | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | For particles of fixed mass, classical equilibrium statistical mechanics dictates a Maxwellian velocity distribution determined solely by the temperature, regardless of the interactions, density, or structure. Supercooled glass forming liquids realize long lived metastable states that evade equilibrium crystallization ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:22:36 GMT"
},
{
"version": "v2",
"created": "Wed, 01 Jul 2026 16:22:03 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-02 | [
[
"Tsereteli",
"Giorgi",
""
],
[
"Nussinov",
"Zohar",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: main6.bbl
================================================
%merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked
%Control: key (0)
%Control: author (72) initials jnrlst
%Control: editor formatted (1) identically to author
%Control: production of article ... |
2606.31986 | 2606.31986 | Lianyu Hu | Lianyu Hu, Shengqian Qin, Zeqin Liao, Qing Guo, Liang Wan, Wei Feng, Yang Liu | CoLT: Teaching Multi-Modal Models to Think with Chain of Latent Thoughts | Accepted by ECCV2026. Code is available at https://github.com/hulianyuyy/CoLT | null | null | null | cs.CV | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has enabled multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) to tackle complex visual reasoning tasks by generating explicit intermediate reasoning steps in natural language. However, this text-based reasoning paradigm is inherently slow at inference time with even thousands of tokens and fund... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:24:40 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Hu",
"Lianyu",
""
],
[
"Qin",
"Shengqian",
""
],
[
"Liao",
"Zeqin",
""
],
[
"Guo",
"Qing",
""
],
[
"Wan",
"Liang",
""
],
[
"Feng",
"Wei",
""
],
[
"Liu",
"Yang",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: eccv.sty
================================================
% ---------------------------------------------------------------
%
% Formatting Package for ECCV Submissions
%
% initially created for ECCV 2024
% by Stefan Roth
%
% based on previous ECCV templates:
% u... |
2606.31987 | 2606.31987 | Alejandro Ruiperez | Alejandro Ruip\'erez | BMPV black hole at first order in $\alpha'$ | 24 pages | null | null | null | hep-th | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | We consider the low-energy effective action of the heterotic string and derive an analytic solution describing the first-order $\alpha'$ corrections to the supersymmetric and extremal BMPV black hole with three unequal charges. The solution interpolates between an asymptotically-flat region and the near-horizon geometr... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:25:31 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Ruipérez",
"Alejandro",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: main.tex
================================================
\documentclass[a4paper, 11 pt]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{braket}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\... |
2606.31988 | 2606.31988 | Benjamin Remy | Benjamin Remy, Chihway Chang, Rebecca Willett | Joint inference of weak lensing convergence map and cosmology with diffusion models | 12 pages, 6 figures | null | null | null | astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IM | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | We present a method for joint inference of cosmological parameters and convergence maps from weak lensing observations, targeting the full posterior conditioned on the observed shear field. Our approach uses implicit inference with diffusion models, learning the joint distribution from simulations, without the need to ... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:25:45 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Remy",
"Benjamin",
""
],
[
"Chang",
"Chihway",
""
],
[
"Willett",
"Rebecca",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: main_mnras.tex
================================================
% mnras_template.tex
%
% LaTeX template for creating an MNRAS paper
%
% v3.2 released 20 July 2023
% (version numbers match those of mnras.cls)
%
% Copyright (C) Royal Astronomical Society 2015
% Auth... |
2606.31989 | 2606.31989 | Moupriya Das | Vipul Rai and Moupriya Das | Exploring the entropic asymmetry on logical stochastic resonance with energetically equivalent intrinsic outputs | 12 pages, 9 figures | null | null | null | cond-mat.stat-mech | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Small-scale systems are inherently subject to environmental noise that can be harnessed constructively to realize reliable logic operations -- a phenomenon known as logical stochastic resonance (LSR), where a bistable system produces correct logical outputs within an optimal window of noise intensity. The Brownian dyna... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:26:45 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Rai",
"Vipul",
""
],
[
"Das",
"Moupriya",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: manuscript.tex
================================================
%\documentclass[10pts,aps,prx,twocolumn,showpacs,notitlepage,floatfix,superscriptaddress]{revtex4-2}
\documentclass[10pt,aps,prx,twocolumn,showpacs,notitlepage,floatfix,superscriptaddress,longbibliogra... |
2606.31990 | 2606.31990 | Lukas Kammerer | Lukas Kammerer, Gabriel Kronberger, Deaglan J. Bartlett, Harry Desmond, Pedro G. Ferreira, Stephan Winkler | Evaluation of Population Initialization Methods for Genetic Programming-based Symbolic Regression | 15 pages. Accepted for publication at EUROCAST 2026: 20th International Conference on Computer Aided Systems Theory | null | null | null | cs.NE cs.LG | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | We analyze the effect of optimizing the initial population of genetic programming (GP) for symbolic regression (SR) on the accuracy and complexity of solutions. We compare three well-established random initialization methods as well as initialization with small optimized solutions from exhaustive symbolic regression (E... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:28:37 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Kammerer",
"Lukas",
""
],
[
"Kronberger",
"Gabriel",
""
],
[
"Bartlett",
"Deaglan J.",
""
],
[
"Desmond",
"Harry",
""
],
[
"Ferreira",
"Pedro G.",
""
],
[
"Winkler",
"Stephan",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: main.bbl
================================================
\begin{thebibliography}{10}
\providecommand{\url}[1]{\texttt{#1}}
\providecommand{\urlprefix}{URL }
\providecommand{\doi}[1]{https://doi.org/#1}
\bibitem{ahmad2018comparison}
Ahmad, H., Helmuth, T.: A compa... |
2606.31991 | 2606.31991 | Wojciech {\L}apacz | Wojciech {\L}apacz, Stanis{\l}aw Pawlak | Amplifying Membership Signal Through Chained Regeneration | null | null | null | null | cs.LG cs.AI | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | The tendency of large generative models to memorize training data makes sample verification critical for privacy auditing and copyright enforcement. Current membership (MIA) and dataset inference (DI) attacks often rely on one-shot generations, which yield weak signals and limited sensitivity across modalities. Inspire... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:29:04 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Łapacz",
"Wojciech",
""
],
[
"Pawlak",
"Stanisław",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: content/00_abstract.tex
================================================
\begin{abstract}
% The tendency of large generative models to memorize training data has established sample verification as a critical necessity for privacy auditing and copyright enforcemen... |
2606.31992 | 2606.31992 | Kailiang Wu | Linfeng Xu, Shengrong Ding, Kailiang Wu | GQL-Based Physical-Constraint-Preserving High-Order Finite Difference Schemes for Special Relativistic Hydrodynamics in Arbitrary Dimensions | null | null | null | null | math.NA astro-ph.IM cs.NA physics.comp-ph physics.flu-dyn | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | High-order accurate simulations of special relativistic hydrodynamics (RHD) are prone to numerical breakdown if intrinsic physical constraints (positive rest-mass density/pressure and subluminal velocity) are violated near strong discontinuities. In this work, we develop a robust and efficient physical-constraint-prese... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:29:34 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Xu",
"Linfeng",
""
],
[
"Ding",
"Shengrong",
""
],
[
"Wu",
"Kailiang",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: elsarticle.cls
================================================
%%
%% This is file `elsarticle.cls',
%% generated with the docstrip utility.
%%
%% The original source files were:
%%
%% elsarticle.dtx (with options: `class')
%%
%% Copyright 2007-2013 Elsevier Ltd
... |
2606.31993 | 2606.31993 | Arpit Bahety | Arnav Balaji, Arpit Bahety, Sriniket Ambatipudi, Daniel Lam, Junhong Xu, Roberto Mart\'in-Mart\'in | OopsieVerse: A Safety Benchmark with Damage-Aware Simulation for Robot Manipulation | Project website: https://robin-lab.cs.utexas.edu/oopsieverse/. The first two authors contributed equally; order decided by dice roll. Accepted to Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS 2026) | null | null | null | cs.RO | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | While robotic manipulation capabilities have advanced rapidly, physical safety remains a major barrier to deploying household robots: task success is insufficient if the robot damages itself or its surroundings. Simulation offers a harm-free alternative to costly and dangerous real-world training and evaluation, yet ex... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:30:05 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Balaji",
"Arnav",
""
],
[
"Bahety",
"Arpit",
""
],
[
"Ambatipudi",
"Sriniket",
""
],
[
"Lam",
"Daniel",
""
],
[
"Xu",
"Junhong",
""
],
[
"Martín-Martín",
"Roberto",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: 00-abstract.tex
================================================
\begin{abstract}
While robotic manipulation capabilities have advanced rapidly, physical safety remains a major barrier to deploying household robots: task success is insufficient if the robot damages... |
2606.31994 | 2606.31994 | Antonela Matija\v{s}i\'c | Antonela Matija\v{s}i\'c | The geometric bookkeeping guide for $\varepsilon$-factorised differential equations | 8 pages, 1 figure; talk presented at Loops and Legs in Quantum Field Theory 2026 | null | null | null | hep-th hep-ph | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | Precision predictions for high-energy experiments rely on accurately evaluating multi-loop, multi-scale Feynman integrals in dimensional regularisation. The method of differential equations is by now the standard tool for this task, but its full power is only realised when the system can be brought into an $\varepsilon... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:30:36 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Matijašić",
"Antonela",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: pos.sty
================================================
%% pos.sty
%% Copyright 2021 SISSA Medialab
%
% This work may be distributed and/or modified under the
% conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3
% of this license or (at your option... |
2606.31995 | 2606.31995 | Alexandre Boucaud | Alexandre Boucaud, Pierre Antilogus, \'Eric Aubourg, Antoine Bernard, Johan Bregeon, Patrick Breugnon, Julien Cordian, Herv\'e Croizet, Guillaume Daubard, Kevin Fanning, Fabrice Gallo, Anthony S. Johnson, Claire Juramy-Gilles, Pierre Karst, Mile Kusulja, Eric Lagorio, Travis Lange, Didier Laporte, Juan-Carlos Lazarte, ... | The filter exchange system of the LSSTCam at the Vera C. Rubin Observatory | 14 pages, 5 figures, proceeding of the SPIE conference | null | null | null | astro-ph.IM | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | The Filter Exchange System of the LSSTCam at the Vera C. Rubin Observatory is a critical subsystem enabling the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) by performing rapid, repeatable exchanges among five large-format filters within a highly constrained in-camera volume. Since the start of on-sky operations in April 202... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:31:02 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Boucaud",
"Alexandre",
""
],
[
"Antilogus",
"Pierre",
""
],
[
"Aubourg",
"Éric",
""
],
[
"Bernard",
"Antoine",
""
],
[
"Bregeon",
"Johan",
""
],
[
"Breugnon",
"Patrick",
""
],
[
"Cordian",
"Julien",
""
]... | ================================================
FILE: main.tex
================================================
\documentclass[]{spie} %>>> use for US letter paper
% \documentclass[a4paper]{spie} %>>> use this instead for A4 paper
%\documentclass[nocompress]{spie} %>>> to avoid compression of citations
\renewcomma... |
2606.31996 | 2606.31996 | Ritam Kundu | Khushboo Dixit, Ritam Kundu, Papia Panda, Soebur Razzaque, Ramita Sarkar | Quantum Information as a New Lens for Precision Neutrino Physics | 31 pages, 7 figures, 3 tables. Comments are welcome | null | null | IP/BBSR/2026-09 | hep-ph hep-ex quant-ph | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | We present a quantum-information-theoretic study of three-flavor neutrino oscillations in long-baseline experiments by mapping flavor states to qubit-like representations and quantifying quantum correlations through total concurrence. The local minima of this entanglement measure identify energy regions where the flavo... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:31:47 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Dixit",
"Khushboo",
""
],
[
"Kundu",
"Ritam",
""
],
[
"Panda",
"Papia",
""
],
[
"Razzaque",
"Soebur",
""
],
[
"Sarkar",
"Ramita",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: jheppub.sty
================================================
%% jheppub.sty
%% Copyright 2013 SISSA Medialab
%
% This work may be distributed and/or modified under the
% conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3
% of this license or (at you... |
2606.31997 | 2606.31997 | Seong-Gyu Yang | Seong-Gyu Yang, Lucas Hedstr\"om, Jan Smrek, Ludvig Lizana | Multifractal Scaling in Hi-C Maps | 12 pages and 6 figures in main text, 13 pages and 9 figures in supporting information | null | null | null | cond-mat.stat-mech physics.bio-ph | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | The three-dimensional organization of the genome exhibits rich, scale-dependent structure, as revealed by both chromosome contact maps (e.g., Hi-C maps) and chromatin density measured by microscopy. Recent studies have reported multifractal scaling in these data. Yet, the origin of this scaling behavior remains unclear... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:31:58 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Yang",
"Seong-Gyu",
""
],
[
"Hedström",
"Lucas",
""
],
[
"Smrek",
"Jan",
""
],
[
"Lizana",
"Ludvig",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: SI.tex
================================================
\documentclass[aps,prl,reprint,superscriptaddress,amsmath,amssymb,longbibliography,onecolumn]{revtex4-2}
%---------------------------------------------
\usepackage{graphicx} % Include figure files
\usepackage... |
2606.31998 | 2606.31998 | Mohammad-Hassan Naddaf | M. H. Naddaf, M. Ghasemnezhad, H. Ghanbarnejad, D. Hutsem\'ekers, and B. Czerny | Radiation-pressure instability is an artifact of constant-$\alpha$ closure | 4 pages + appendix (4 pages), 2 figures, A&A Letters | null | null | null | astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IM | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ | The standard $\alpha$-disk formalism parametrizes turbulent angular momentum transport through a dimensionless coefficient $\alpha$, assumed to be spatially and thermodynamically invariant. While analytically convenient, this assumption leads to the well-known thermal and viscous instabilities in radiation-pressure dom... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:33:19 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Naddaf",
"M. H.",
""
],
[
"Ghasemnezhad",
"M.",
""
],
[
"Ghanbarnejad",
"H.",
""
],
[
"Hutsemékers",
"D.",
""
],
[
"Czerny",
"B.",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: aa.cls
================================================
%%
%% This is file `aa.cls',
%% generated with the docstrip utility.
%%
%% The original source files were:
%%
%% aa.dtx (with options: `aa')
%%
%% aa.dtx
%% Copyright EDP Sciences (2025), J.-C. Charpentier (... |
2606.31999 | 2606.31999 | Konstantin Osetrin | Vladimir Epp and Konstantin Osetrin and Taya But | Electromagnetic radiation from a point-like charge in a weak gravitational wave: a Shapiro-delay-motivated approach | 19 pages, 10 figures | null | null | null | gr-qc hep-th math-ph math.MP | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | We investigate the field of a point-like electric charge freely falling in a gravitational wave. In the presence of a gravitational wave, the initially static Coulomb field of the charge becomes time-dependent and generates corresponding radiation. The gravitational wave is treated as a weak perturbation of the Minkows... | [
{
"version": "v1",
"created": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:33:25 GMT"
}
] | 2026-07-01 | [
[
"Epp",
"Vladimir",
""
],
[
"Osetrin",
"Konstantin",
""
],
[
"But",
"Taya",
""
]
] | ================================================
FILE: ENG_Preprint_Epp_PRD_Time_delay_v_05_List.tex
================================================
%% ****** Start of file apstemplate.tex ****** %
%%
%%
%% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4.2 distribution.
%% Version 4.2a of REVTeX, January, 2015
... |