workspace stringclasses 1
value | channel stringclasses 1
value | sentences stringlengths 1 3.93k | ts stringlengths 26 26 | user stringlengths 2 11 | sentence_id stringlengths 44 53 | timestamp float64 1.5B 1.56B | __index_level_0__ int64 0 106k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pythondev | help | maybe someone had read the book <https://pragprog.com/book/bopytest/python-testing-with-pytest> ? | 2017-11-08T08:14:12.000357 | Bella | pythondev_help_Bella_2017-11-08T08:14:12.000357 | 1,510,128,852.000357 | 99,803 |
pythondev | help | <https://pythondev.slack.com/archives/C07F1KB2Q/p1510160730000266> | 2017-11-08T12:07:20.000852 | Collette | pythondev_help_Collette_2017-11-08T12:07:20.000852 | 1,510,142,840.000852 | 99,804 |
pythondev | help | OK, I've been working on something and can't seem to get all the pieces together correctly. The goal: Take a list of list of strings (results of a query from a SQL database), (hopefully) compress it, and ship it to an Azure blob storage as .tsv files. All in memory. The azure-storage library has a create_blob_from_s... | 2017-11-08T12:54:08.000409 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T12:54:08.000409 | 1,510,145,648.000409 | 99,805 |
pythondev | help | Trying to keep it as lightweight as possible since it's going to be running on an RPi (hence the trying to avoid writing to disk aspect) | 2017-11-08T12:55:07.000415 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T12:55:07.000415 | 1,510,145,707.000415 | 99,806 |
pythondev | help | The compression might be optional if the overhead of compressing isn't worth doing it (to lower the bandwidth), I was going to test doing it with/without and see if it was worth the tradeoff in time spent sending it to blob uncompressed vs compressed). I can't imagine the overhead is a lot but I honestly have no clue ... | 2017-11-08T12:58:23.000280 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T12:58:23.000280 | 1,510,145,903.00028 | 99,807 |
pythondev | help | so I guess my first question would be, does this work without compression? | 2017-11-08T12:59:32.000695 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-08T12:59:32.000695 | 1,510,145,972.000695 | 99,808 |
pythondev | help | Yes. It feels super hacky, and I'm not sure BytesIO is what I ultimately want to be using, but it works. | 2017-11-08T13:00:49.000431 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T13:00:49.000431 | 1,510,146,049.000431 | 99,809 |
pythondev | help | Everything I'm reading makes it seem like I should be using StringIO, but then I get a 'bytes' related error (after removing all the obvious byte things I'm doing in that snippet) | 2017-11-08T13:03:11.000130 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T13:03:11.000130 | 1,510,146,191.00013 | 99,810 |
pythondev | help | Or maybe TextIOWrapper? That seems more like for loading from a file on disk rather than a stream | 2017-11-08T13:04:19.000242 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T13:04:19.000242 | 1,510,146,259.000242 | 99,811 |
pythondev | help | you could look into temporary files | 2017-11-08T13:09:30.000371 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-08T13:09:30.000371 | 1,510,146,570.000371 | 99,812 |
pythondev | help | <https://docs.python.org/3/library/tempfile.html> | 2017-11-08T13:09:45.000335 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-08T13:09:45.000335 | 1,510,146,585.000335 | 99,813 |
pythondev | help | Doesn't that create temporary files on the disk potentially? | 2017-11-08T13:19:59.000499 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T13:19:59.000499 | 1,510,147,199.000499 | 99,814 |
pythondev | help | and is cleaned up after you close | 2017-11-08T13:21:50.000625 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-08T13:21:50.000625 | 1,510,147,310.000625 | 99,815 |
pythondev | help | so if you create it within a context manager, eg `with open(temp_file)`, it cleans up when the block finishes | 2017-11-08T13:22:18.000331 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-08T13:22:18.000331 | 1,510,147,338.000331 | 99,816 |
pythondev | help | Is a potential option, except we don't want to write anything to disk at all unless we really have to. Mostly because with RPi's will burn out the SD card with constant read/writes which normally isn't a problem with most applications | 2017-11-08T13:23:34.000478 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T13:23:34.000478 | 1,510,147,414.000478 | 99,817 |
pythondev | help | have you seen this? | 2017-11-08T13:25:41.000328 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-08T13:25:41.000328 | 1,510,147,541.000328 | 99,818 |
pythondev | help | <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32794837/pass-io-bytesio-object-to-gzip-gzipfile-and-write-to-gzipfile> | 2017-11-08T13:25:42.000310 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-08T13:25:42.000310 | 1,510,147,542.00031 | 99,819 |
pythondev | help | I haven't, but i'm reading now | 2017-11-08T13:28:22.000729 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T13:28:22.000729 | 1,510,147,702.000729 | 99,820 |
pythondev | help | I think one of the things that I'm not sure how to handle is when you open a GzipFile and write things to it, how can you get read access to that GzipFile to do things like send it elsewhere? | 2017-11-08T13:34:32.000124 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T13:34:32.000124 | 1,510,148,072.000124 | 99,821 |
pythondev | help | Or maybe I have the whole process a little switched up. Maybe I need to do something like open a stream `f`, with `gzip.GzipFile(fileobj=f, 'w')` add the relevant row elements to that Gzip, which maybe puts that compressed stuff into the stream f? | 2017-11-08T13:36:16.000159 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T13:36:16.000159 | 1,510,148,176.000159 | 99,822 |
pythondev | help | Right now I think I'm adding things to the stream, then somehow trying to zip it up after the fact | 2017-11-08T13:36:30.000216 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T13:36:30.000216 | 1,510,148,190.000216 | 99,823 |
pythondev | help | Ahahaha, that was it! | 2017-11-08T13:48:47.000083 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T13:48:47.000083 | 1,510,148,927.000083 | 99,824 |
pythondev | help | Something just clicked about streams | 2017-11-08T13:48:53.000336 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T13:48:53.000336 | 1,510,148,933.000336 | 99,825 |
pythondev | help | Hi everyone, I'm using sqlite3 and I have a column I want to be unique. I've set the unique constraint on it so now I get an sqlite3.IntegrityError thrown when I try and add a duplicate item, which is what I want.
Now I'm making a webscraper, and as I find new things to add to my db, I want to make sure they're not a... | 2017-11-08T14:02:08.000232 | Alysia | pythondev_help_Alysia_2017-11-08T14:02:08.000232 | 1,510,149,728.000232 | 99,826 |
pythondev | help | I mean I can loop through the table or whatever and check like that, but it feels like that's going to be slower than the exception way | 2017-11-08T14:02:54.000038 | Alysia | pythondev_help_Alysia_2017-11-08T14:02:54.000038 | 1,510,149,774.000038 | 99,827 |
pythondev | help | python philosophy is ask for forgiveness; A try/except is :thumbsup: | 2017-11-08T14:16:14.000488 | Ciera | pythondev_help_Ciera_2017-11-08T14:16:14.000488 | 1,510,150,574.000488 | 99,828 |
pythondev | help | cool, thanks | 2017-11-08T14:24:28.000103 | Alysia | pythondev_help_Alysia_2017-11-08T14:24:28.000103 | 1,510,151,068.000103 | 99,829 |
pythondev | help | Hi guys, somebody have already did iterations about the values that are in the keys of redis ? | 2017-11-08T14:31:11.000063 | Estell | pythondev_help_Estell_2017-11-08T14:31:11.000063 | 1,510,151,471.000063 | 99,830 |
pythondev | help | I've some messy values that need to cleanup | 2017-11-08T14:32:09.000457 | Estell | pythondev_help_Estell_2017-11-08T14:32:09.000457 | 1,510,151,529.000457 | 99,831 |
pythondev | help | As a followup to my earlier confusion about streams like `io.BytesIO`, when does this stream "empty" out? I found myself reusing the same stream object over many iterations of a loop, but wasn't finding any issues even when using `seek(0)` about data being duplicated. I'd rather be safe than sorry, but I'd like to un... | 2017-11-08T14:39:32.000095 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T14:39:32.000095 | 1,510,151,972.000095 | 99,832 |
pythondev | help | as I understand it, when you do `seek(0)`, it moves the pointer to the 0th byte of the stream. so when any writes happen, the bytes before that get overwritten | 2017-11-08T14:41:45.000002 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-08T14:41:45.000002 | 1,510,152,105.000002 | 99,833 |
pythondev | help | but conversely, it also means the bytes after still exist | 2017-11-08T14:42:07.000049 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-08T14:42:07.000049 | 1,510,152,127.000049 | 99,834 |
pythondev | help | So what i'm doing currently is: write to stream, seek(0), then send that stream somewhere else (like azure blob in my case), then repeat for the next thing in my list using the same stream. I'm not currently getting any duplicate data, but it feels wrong. I think I'm going to switch it so it's using a fresh `BytesIO`... | 2017-11-08T14:52:48.000217 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T14:52:48.000217 | 1,510,152,768.000217 | 99,835 |
pythondev | help | makes sense | 2017-11-08T14:53:23.000511 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-08T14:53:23.000511 | 1,510,152,803.000511 | 99,836 |
pythondev | help | Mostly it feels wrong because the next time I did seek(0) I would expect to see duplicate data (the stuff from the first iteration of the loop, plus the stuff for the current loop) | 2017-11-08T14:53:26.000231 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T14:53:26.000231 | 1,510,152,806.000231 | 99,837 |
pythondev | help | because the old stream will be garbage collected when all references don’t exist | 2017-11-08T14:53:42.000260 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-08T14:53:42.000260 | 1,510,152,822.00026 | 99,838 |
pythondev | help | But I don't see anything from the old iterations so I assumed it was getting cleared or something at some point | 2017-11-08T14:53:44.000648 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T14:53:44.000648 | 1,510,152,824.000648 | 99,839 |
pythondev | help | This is the most likely explanation I think | 2017-11-08T14:54:40.000486 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T14:54:40.000486 | 1,510,152,880.000486 | 99,840 |
pythondev | help | thanks for the help <@Meg> :slightly_smiling_face: | 2017-11-08T14:55:00.000231 | Richelle | pythondev_help_Richelle_2017-11-08T14:55:00.000231 | 1,510,152,900.000231 | 99,841 |
pythondev | help | How do I check if a beautifulSoup item has any children? | 2017-11-08T20:58:46.000044 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T20:58:46.000044 | 1,510,174,726.000044 | 99,842 |
pythondev | help | `findAll(tag_name)` returns a list | 2017-11-08T21:01:42.000077 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-08T21:01:42.000077 | 1,510,174,902.000077 | 99,843 |
pythondev | help | <https://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/bs4/doc/#find-all> | 2017-11-08T21:02:46.000035 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-08T21:02:46.000035 | 1,510,174,966.000035 | 99,844 |
pythondev | help | I have data where there are `<p>` tags will be present sometimes with children and some times without children. | 2017-11-08T21:04:23.000158 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T21:04:23.000158 | 1,510,175,063.000158 | 99,845 |
pythondev | help | If there are children I want to get them else get the original tag | 2017-11-08T21:04:40.000096 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T21:04:40.000096 | 1,510,175,080.000096 | 99,846 |
pythondev | help | unfortunately, there’s no `has_child` method in BS | 2017-11-08T21:04:50.000061 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-08T21:04:50.000061 | 1,510,175,090.000061 | 99,847 |
pythondev | help | Will findall work even if I have no children | 2017-11-08T21:04:56.000162 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T21:04:56.000162 | 1,510,175,096.000162 | 99,848 |
pythondev | help | you’ll have to test for it | 2017-11-08T21:04:56.000250 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-08T21:04:56.000250 | 1,510,175,096.00025 | 99,849 |
pythondev | help | Ok | 2017-11-08T21:05:46.000117 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T21:05:46.000117 | 1,510,175,146.000117 | 99,850 |
pythondev | help | `soup.find_all()>1` seems to work | 2017-11-08T21:53:58.000007 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T21:53:58.000007 | 1,510,178,038.000007 | 99,851 |
pythondev | help | I want to find the immediate children of `<body>`. I don't want to find the sub-children of elements in `<body>`, but `soup.findall()` is finding everything and creating duplicates | 2017-11-08T22:11:20.000048 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T22:11:20.000048 | 1,510,179,080.000048 | 99,852 |
pythondev | help | I guess I could do `sound.find()` and get the siblings | 2017-11-08T22:12:06.000043 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T22:12:06.000043 | 1,510,179,126.000043 | 99,853 |
pythondev | help | But I'm having difficulty in finding a way to loop through all siblings | 2017-11-08T22:15:24.000105 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T22:15:24.000105 | 1,510,179,324.000105 | 99,854 |
pythondev | help | NVM .nextSibling is not working | 2017-11-08T22:25:20.000147 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T22:25:20.000147 | 1,510,179,920.000147 | 99,855 |
pythondev | help | how about
```
for c in soup.body.children:
has_child = True
break
else:
has_child = False
``` | 2017-11-08T22:36:58.000144 | Gisele | pythondev_help_Gisele_2017-11-08T22:36:58.000144 | 1,510,180,618.000144 | 99,856 |
pythondev | help | NVM did
```
s_first = soup.find()
soup_list.append(s_first)
soup_list.append(s_first.fetchNextSiblings())
for s_next in s_first.fetchNextSiblings():
print("________________________----------------------------------_________________________________")
print s_next
``` | 2017-11-08T22:39:52.000191 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T22:39:52.000191 | 1,510,180,792.000191 | 99,857 |
pythondev | help | Wouldn't that give the lowest elements and not the immediate children as I would want? | 2017-11-08T22:40:19.000064 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T22:40:19.000064 | 1,510,180,819.000064 | 99,858 |
pythondev | help | <@Gisele> | 2017-11-08T22:40:26.000075 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T22:40:26.000075 | 1,510,180,826.000075 | 99,859 |
pythondev | help | Had to remove head body and the extra div though. lol | 2017-11-08T22:41:02.000026 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T22:41:02.000026 | 1,510,180,862.000026 | 99,860 |
pythondev | help | I think soup.body.children give you immediate children of body | 2017-11-08T22:45:09.000044 | Gisele | pythondev_help_Gisele_2017-11-08T22:45:09.000044 | 1,510,181,109.000044 | 99,861 |
pythondev | help | Thanks. It is `soup.body.div.children` for me | 2017-11-08T22:48:33.000191 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T22:48:33.000191 | 1,510,181,313.000191 | 99,862 |
pythondev | help | I'm getting navigable string error | 2017-11-08T23:12:46.000228 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T23:12:46.000228 | 1,510,182,766.000228 | 99,863 |
pythondev | help | My original code however works | 2017-11-08T23:12:56.000013 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T23:12:56.000013 | 1,510,182,776.000013 | 99,864 |
pythondev | help | ```
s_first = soup.body.div.find()
soup_list.append(s_first)
soup_list.extend(s_first.fetchNextSiblings())
for s_next in s_first.fetchNextSiblings():
print("________________________----------------------------------_________________________________")
print s_next
for s in soup_list:
try:
s.tex... | 2017-11-08T23:13:02.000171 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T23:13:02.000171 | 1,510,182,782.000171 | 99,865 |
pythondev | help | ```
for sc in soup.body.div.children:
print("___________________________________________________________")
try:
print(sc.text)
except:
pass
``` | 2017-11-08T23:35:30.000076 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T23:35:30.000076 | 1,510,184,130.000076 | 99,866 |
pythondev | help | Works too | 2017-11-08T23:35:32.000229 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T23:35:32.000229 | 1,510,184,132.000229 | 99,867 |
pythondev | help | It seems BS4 was auto converting some empty elements into navigable strings | 2017-11-08T23:42:41.000091 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T23:42:41.000091 | 1,510,184,561.000091 | 99,868 |
pythondev | help | Which were raising exceptions on printing | 2017-11-08T23:43:04.000117 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-08T23:43:04.000117 | 1,510,184,584.000117 | 99,869 |
pythondev | help | Has anyone here worked with tweepy? The tweets I'm trying to print keep getting cut off | 2017-11-08T23:58:30.000035 | Aida | pythondev_help_Aida_2017-11-08T23:58:30.000035 | 1,510,185,510.000035 | 99,870 |
pythondev | help | Nevermind. I got it figured out. I need to use tweet_mode = "extended" parameter | 2017-11-09T00:16:05.000137 | Aida | pythondev_help_Aida_2017-11-09T00:16:05.000137 | 1,510,186,565.000137 | 99,871 |
pythondev | help | Will ```If re.findall(r"Q\d+", sqa.text):``` be true only if there is a match? | 2017-11-09T00:51:47.000138 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-09T00:51:47.000138 | 1,510,188,707.000138 | 99,872 |
pythondev | help | Looks it is so | 2017-11-09T00:54:19.000026 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-09T00:54:19.000026 | 1,510,188,859.000026 | 99,873 |
pythondev | help | Since it is an empty list | 2017-11-09T00:54:28.000010 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-09T00:54:28.000010 | 1,510,188,868.00001 | 99,874 |
pythondev | help | I have the following code. It's not appending anything to the end list | 2017-11-09T01:55:07.000164 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-09T01:55:07.000164 | 1,510,192,507.000164 | 99,875 |
pythondev | help | I don't know why, but the list is empty | 2017-11-09T01:55:27.000222 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-09T01:55:27.000222 | 1,510,192,527.000222 | 99,876 |
pythondev | help | Seems the answer finding regex is wrong | 2017-11-09T02:07:53.000171 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-09T02:07:53.000171 | 1,510,193,273.000171 | 99,877 |
pythondev | help | I want to train a trained model on additional data without losing previously trained information on sklearn? any ideas? | 2017-11-09T02:11:05.000007 | Malorie | pythondev_help_Malorie_2017-11-09T02:11:05.000007 | 1,510,193,465.000007 | 99,878 |
pythondev | help | Works now. Changed the function order | 2017-11-09T02:20:56.000131 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-09T02:20:56.000131 | 1,510,194,056.000131 | 99,879 |
pythondev | help | Seems the `answer_found` `elif` was never called | 2017-11-09T02:21:18.000175 | Jazmine | pythondev_help_Jazmine_2017-11-09T02:21:18.000175 | 1,510,194,078.000175 | 99,880 |
pythondev | help | Does time.sleep block workers in celery? | 2017-11-09T06:13:00.000216 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-09T06:13:00.000216 | 1,510,207,980.000216 | 99,881 |
pythondev | help | I know it doesn't block threads | 2017-11-09T06:13:08.000181 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-09T06:13:08.000181 | 1,510,207,988.000181 | 99,882 |
pythondev | help | but workers? | 2017-11-09T06:13:09.000279 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-09T06:13:09.000279 | 1,510,207,989.000279 | 99,883 |
pythondev | help | yes, it does | 2017-11-09T06:13:22.000139 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-09T06:13:22.000139 | 1,510,208,002.000139 | 99,884 |
pythondev | help | at least in my experience | 2017-11-09T06:13:48.000085 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-09T06:13:48.000085 | 1,510,208,028.000085 | 99,885 |
pythondev | help | so, I have a group of tasks executing from a broadcast task of sorts | 2017-11-09T06:14:09.000138 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-09T06:14:09.000138 | 1,510,208,049.000138 | 99,886 |
pythondev | help | and once that group finishes, I need to run a cleanup task | 2017-11-09T06:14:22.000020 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-09T06:14:22.000020 | 1,510,208,062.00002 | 99,887 |
pythondev | help | ```
aws_keys = AbstractIndexTask._get_keys(cl_id)
task = SinglePageIndexTask()
key_count = len(aws_keys)
tasks = []
<http://self.logger.info|self.logger.info>('[{}] keys to index for catalog [{}]'.format(key_count, cl_id))
for idx, key in enumerate(aws_keys):
... | 2017-11-09T06:16:37.000291 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-09T06:16:37.000291 | 1,510,208,197.000291 | 99,888 |
pythondev | help | that `sleep` in the `while` loop is blocking, so the controller task stays active until all the child tasks are complete | 2017-11-09T06:18:11.000121 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-09T06:18:11.000121 | 1,510,208,291.000121 | 99,889 |
pythondev | help | Hmmmm | 2017-11-09T06:19:24.000094 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-09T06:19:24.000094 | 1,510,208,364.000094 | 99,890 |
pythondev | help | hello everyone
how
>>> a = '[1,2,3,4]'
to do
>>> a = [1,2,3,4]
? | 2017-11-09T06:22:02.000371 | Georgeann | pythondev_help_Georgeann_2017-11-09T06:22:02.000371 | 1,510,208,522.000371 | 99,891 |
pythondev | help | huh? I think you better restructure your question because it makes no sense | 2017-11-09T06:23:31.000414 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-09T06:23:31.000414 | 1,510,208,611.000414 | 99,892 |
pythondev | help | `a = eval(a)` | 2017-11-09T06:23:37.000147 | Fabiola | pythondev_help_Fabiola_2017-11-09T06:23:37.000147 | 1,510,208,617.000147 | 99,893 |
pythondev | help | Not advised | 2017-11-09T06:23:45.000055 | Fabiola | pythondev_help_Fabiola_2017-11-09T06:23:45.000055 | 1,510,208,625.000055 | 99,894 |
pythondev | help | But is that what you want? | 2017-11-09T06:23:56.000030 | Fabiola | pythondev_help_Fabiola_2017-11-09T06:23:56.000030 | 1,510,208,636.00003 | 99,895 |
pythondev | help | I mean, you can do that, but highly not advised, as <@Fabiola> said | 2017-11-09T06:23:58.000018 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-09T06:23:58.000018 | 1,510,208,638.000018 | 99,896 |
pythondev | help | in other words, avoid at all costs :smile: | 2017-11-09T06:24:10.000050 | Meg | pythondev_help_Meg_2017-11-09T06:24:10.000050 | 1,510,208,650.00005 | 99,897 |
pythondev | help | Why do you have these variables are what is your objective, <@Georgeann>? | 2017-11-09T06:24:49.000365 | Fabiola | pythondev_help_Fabiola_2017-11-09T06:24:49.000365 | 1,510,208,689.000365 | 99,898 |
pythondev | help | alternative solution which does not use `eval` | 2017-11-09T06:27:55.000060 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-09T06:27:55.000060 | 1,510,208,875.00006 | 99,899 |
pythondev | help | `json.loads(a)` | 2017-11-09T06:28:02.000012 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-09T06:28:02.000012 | 1,510,208,882.000012 | 99,900 |
pythondev | help | I got something data from csv.
think how to get keys from json. | 2017-11-09T06:28:05.000237 | Georgeann | pythondev_help_Georgeann_2017-11-09T06:28:05.000237 | 1,510,208,885.000237 | 99,901 |
pythondev | help | <@Georgeann> are you using pythons in built csv library? | 2017-11-09T06:28:28.000041 | Vada | pythondev_help_Vada_2017-11-09T06:28:28.000041 | 1,510,208,908.000041 | 99,902 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.