workspace stringclasses 1
value | channel stringclasses 1
value | sentences stringlengths 1 3.93k | ts stringlengths 26 26 | user stringlengths 2 11 | sentence_id stringlengths 44 53 | timestamp float64 1.5B 1.56B | __index_level_0__ int64 0 106k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pythondev | help | <@Garrett> the zip is much cleaner, i like it | 2018-01-05T14:46:33.000204 | Sheldon | pythondev_help_Sheldon_2018-01-05T14:46:33.000204 | 1,515,163,593.000204 | 27,824 |
pythondev | help | oh nice I dind't know that zip trick inside a list comp | 2018-01-05T14:46:34.000253 | Majorie | pythondev_help_Majorie_2018-01-05T14:46:34.000253 | 1,515,163,594.000253 | 27,825 |
pythondev | help | that said, that's a slightly awkward to read listcomp so i'd probably do it in a normal `for` loop | 2018-01-05T14:47:12.000451 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T14:47:12.000451 | 1,515,163,632.000451 | 27,826 |
pythondev | help | Yea...you're probably right. | 2018-01-05T14:47:45.000029 | Majorie | pythondev_help_Majorie_2018-01-05T14:47:45.000029 | 1,515,163,665.000029 | 27,827 |
pythondev | help | ```
test_var = zip(x,y)
string_var = ""
for z in test_var:
if z[0] is 0:
string_var += f"{z[1]}"
elif z[0] > 1:
string_var += f"{z[1]}(+{z[0]}),"
``` | 2018-01-05T14:47:46.000520 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T14:47:46.000520 | 1,515,163,666.00052 | 27,828 |
pythondev | help | Might need to add some more logic to get rid of that ending comma though | 2018-01-05T14:48:32.000438 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T14:48:32.000438 | 1,515,163,712.000438 | 27,829 |
pythondev | help | naw, you can do it simpler than that | 2018-01-05T14:50:29.000040 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T14:50:29.000040 | 1,515,163,829.00004 | 27,830 |
pythondev | help | unfortunately I'm stuck on 3.5 atm | 2018-01-05T14:52:32.000360 | Majorie | pythondev_help_Majorie_2018-01-05T14:52:32.000360 | 1,515,163,952.00036 | 27,831 |
pythondev | help | obv that `output` could be your `return` statement or whatever | 2018-01-05T14:52:33.000342 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T14:52:33.000342 | 1,515,163,953.000342 | 27,832 |
pythondev | help | lol. fixed that for you, then | 2018-01-05T14:52:58.000255 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T14:52:58.000255 | 1,515,163,978.000255 | 27,833 |
pythondev | help | zip() is doing something odd in my console when I save it to a var. I can output it once but when I do it again it outputs nothing | 2018-01-05T14:53:49.000559 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T14:53:49.000559 | 1,515,164,029.000559 | 27,834 |
pythondev | help | yep. `zip()` is a generator | 2018-01-05T14:53:59.000054 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T14:53:59.000054 | 1,515,164,039.000054 | 27,835 |
pythondev | help | LIke it loses itself after it gets used once | 2018-01-05T14:53:59.000642 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T14:53:59.000642 | 1,515,164,039.000642 | 27,836 |
pythondev | help | you can only run through it once | 2018-01-05T14:54:03.000308 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T14:54:03.000308 | 1,515,164,043.000308 | 27,837 |
pythondev | help | ahh | 2018-01-05T14:54:05.000270 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T14:54:05.000270 | 1,515,164,045.00027 | 27,838 |
pythondev | help | ok | 2018-01-05T14:54:06.000153 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T14:54:06.000153 | 1,515,164,046.000153 | 27,839 |
pythondev | help | in the shell, though, just recreate it by running `foo = zip(bar, baz)` again | 2018-01-05T14:54:37.000252 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T14:54:37.000252 | 1,515,164,077.000252 | 27,840 |
pythondev | help | a vast chunk of python 3 is generators. :heart: | 2018-01-05T14:54:48.000052 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T14:54:48.000052 | 1,515,164,088.000052 | 27,841 |
pythondev | help | That's what I was doing :slightly_smiling_face: | 2018-01-05T14:54:48.000373 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T14:54:48.000373 | 1,515,164,088.000373 | 27,842 |
pythondev | help | generators are wonderful but that's definitely a bit of a gotcha | 2018-01-05T14:56:21.000312 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T14:56:21.000312 | 1,515,164,181.000312 | 27,843 |
pythondev | help | That's the `yield` command in a function right? | 2018-01-05T14:57:51.000006 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T14:57:51.000006 | 1,515,164,271.000006 | 27,844 |
pythondev | help | yep | 2018-01-05T14:58:03.000052 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T14:58:03.000052 | 1,515,164,283.000052 | 27,845 |
pythondev | help | or `(x for x in y)` <- generator expression | 2018-01-05T14:58:17.000284 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T14:58:17.000284 | 1,515,164,297.000284 | 27,846 |
pythondev | help | like a list comp but doesn't produce a list in memory. you can't do a tuple comp since tuples are immutable | 2018-01-05T14:58:43.000336 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T14:58:43.000336 | 1,515,164,323.000336 | 27,847 |
pythondev | help | best thing about generators in modern python is that you can yield from them | 2018-01-05T15:00:45.000384 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:00:45.000384 | 1,515,164,445.000384 | 27,848 |
pythondev | help | Yeah, still trying to get my head around it and when to use it. Does it make processing time faster as well? | 2018-01-05T15:03:56.000123 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:03:56.000123 | 1,515,164,636.000123 | 27,849 |
pythondev | help | possibly. mostly it's a memory-concern | 2018-01-05T15:04:46.000343 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:04:46.000343 | 1,515,164,686.000343 | 27,850 |
pythondev | help | So, I have a program that uses MS Graph to pull unread emails out of an inbox and parses them. It parses them via a for loop right now. Would it make more sense to try using a generator so I don't have to interate through them like that? | 2018-01-05T15:08:15.000361 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:08:15.000361 | 1,515,164,895.000361 | 27,851 |
pythondev | help | So each indv email isn't kept in memory? | 2018-01-05T15:08:43.000352 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:08:43.000352 | 1,515,164,923.000352 | 27,852 |
pythondev | help | if you can make it so you yield each email as it comes out, yeah, i'd say that would be an improvement | 2018-01-05T15:09:03.000568 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:09:03.000568 | 1,515,164,943.000568 | 27,853 |
pythondev | help | Perhaps in the API call function I made then? | 2018-01-05T15:10:27.000010 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:10:27.000010 | 1,515,165,027.00001 | 27,854 |
pythondev | help | yeah, probably | 2018-01-05T15:10:57.000333 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:10:57.000333 | 1,515,165,057.000333 | 27,855 |
pythondev | help | yeah, that line 20 could probably be `yield api_json_data` | 2018-01-05T15:11:24.000543 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:11:24.000543 | 1,515,165,084.000543 | 27,856 |
pythondev | help | eh, no | 2018-01-05T15:11:30.000272 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:11:30.000272 | 1,515,165,090.000272 | 27,857 |
pythondev | help | walk us through what that's doing? you don't have any comments and it's _really_ generic code | 2018-01-05T15:11:59.000146 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:11:59.000146 | 1,515,165,119.000146 | 27,858 |
pythondev | help | like what is `api_response.json()`? | 2018-01-05T15:12:37.000383 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:12:37.000383 | 1,515,165,157.000383 | 27,859 |
pythondev | help | Basically turns the api_response into a dictionary | 2018-01-05T15:13:02.000185 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:13:02.000185 | 1,515,165,182.000185 | 27,860 |
pythondev | help | lol, yes, i know what the `.json()` _does_. but what's in there? | 2018-01-05T15:13:18.000529 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:13:18.000529 | 1,515,165,198.000529 | 27,861 |
pythondev | help | is the api response the full inbox? | 2018-01-05T15:13:25.000293 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:13:25.000293 | 1,515,165,205.000293 | 27,862 |
pythondev | help | also, don't do `if continue_code is True:`. just do `if continue_code:` | 2018-01-05T15:13:50.000094 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:13:50.000094 | 1,515,165,230.000094 | 27,863 |
pythondev | help | `is` comparisons are 99.999% a code smell | 2018-01-05T15:14:02.000250 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:14:02.000250 | 1,515,165,242.00025 | 27,864 |
pythondev | help | ```email_json_data = api_caller(
graph_api_endpoint,
(f'/users/{username}/mailFolders/{inbox_mail_folder_id}/messages?$top=200'),
"get",
headers
)
``` | 2018-01-05T15:14:02.000584 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:14:02.000584 | 1,515,165,242.000584 | 27,865 |
pythondev | help | Here is an example of a call I make that gets the top 200 items from the inbox | 2018-01-05T15:14:18.000305 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:14:18.000305 | 1,515,165,258.000305 | 27,866 |
pythondev | help | and that ends up with `email_json_data` being a list of dicts? | 2018-01-05T15:15:49.000352 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:15:49.000352 | 1,515,165,349.000352 | 27,867 |
pythondev | help | Yep | 2018-01-05T15:16:09.000620 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:16:09.000620 | 1,515,165,369.00062 | 27,868 |
pythondev | help | so, yeah, you could do `yield from api_json_data` (assuming `api_json_data` is an iterable) | 2018-01-05T15:16:41.000620 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:16:41.000620 | 1,515,165,401.00062 | 27,869 |
pythondev | help | I'll give it a shot | 2018-01-05T15:17:57.000032 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:17:57.000032 | 1,515,165,477.000032 | 27,870 |
pythondev | help | TypeError: 'generator' object is not subscriptable | 2018-01-05T15:19:11.000168 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:19:11.000168 | 1,515,165,551.000168 | 27,871 |
pythondev | help | True | 2018-01-05T15:19:26.000138 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:19:26.000138 | 1,515,165,566.000138 | 27,872 |
pythondev | help | you're trying to get an index from the generator. can't do that | 2018-01-05T15:19:42.000463 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:19:42.000463 | 1,515,165,582.000463 | 27,873 |
pythondev | help | 'cause you only ever have a single item at a time from the generator | 2018-01-05T15:19:52.000161 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:19:52.000161 | 1,515,165,592.000161 | 27,874 |
pythondev | help | So how would I cycle through all the results? | 2018-01-05T15:21:08.000322 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:21:08.000322 | 1,515,165,668.000322 | 27,875 |
pythondev | help | `for result in results:` | 2018-01-05T15:21:31.000012 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:21:31.000012 | 1,515,165,691.000012 | 27,876 |
pythondev | help | how else would you do it? | 2018-01-05T15:21:35.000354 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:21:35.000354 | 1,515,165,695.000354 | 27,877 |
pythondev | help | Oh, I see what I see what's going on. | 2018-01-05T15:22:24.000178 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:22:24.000178 | 1,515,165,744.000178 | 27,878 |
pythondev | help | So the previous code was returning one single object that had a ['value'] property in the dictionary that had a list inside of it that I was interating through | 2018-01-05T15:23:14.000209 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:23:14.000209 | 1,515,165,794.000209 | 27,879 |
pythondev | help | Now the results are showing @odata stuff and 'value' as a string | 2018-01-05T15:24:15.000402 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:24:15.000402 | 1,515,165,855.000402 | 27,880 |
pythondev | help | None of the extra data underneath value. | 2018-01-05T15:24:48.000580 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:24:48.000580 | 1,515,165,888.00058 | 27,881 |
pythondev | help | ah, yeah, if `api_json_data` was a dict, not a list of dicts, then you'd be yielding the keys | 2018-01-05T15:25:30.000277 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:25:30.000277 | 1,515,165,930.000277 | 27,882 |
pythondev | help | bbiab, meeting | 2018-01-05T15:26:47.000109 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:26:47.000109 | 1,515,166,007.000109 | 27,883 |
pythondev | help | <@Pandora> is that an editor? | 2018-01-05T15:28:41.000187 | Majorie | pythondev_help_Majorie_2018-01-05T15:28:41.000187 | 1,515,166,121.000187 | 27,884 |
pythondev | help | vscode's debugger | 2018-01-05T15:28:53.000336 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:28:53.000336 | 1,515,166,133.000336 | 27,885 |
pythondev | help | <@Pandora> see the `items()` in your first screenshot? it's a dict | 2018-01-05T15:28:54.000462 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:28:54.000462 | 1,515,166,134.000462 | 27,886 |
pythondev | help | oh that looks nice | 2018-01-05T15:29:11.000384 | Majorie | pythondev_help_Majorie_2018-01-05T15:29:11.000384 | 1,515,166,151.000384 | 27,887 |
pythondev | help | Aye | 2018-01-05T15:29:13.000283 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:29:13.000283 | 1,515,166,153.000283 | 27,888 |
pythondev | help | <@Majorie> I'm really liking VSCode for Python. The debugger is really nice (not that I have much experience with other editors) | 2018-01-05T15:30:06.000429 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:30:06.000429 | 1,515,166,206.000429 | 27,889 |
pythondev | help | but it works for me | 2018-01-05T15:30:12.000337 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:30:12.000337 | 1,515,166,212.000337 | 27,890 |
pythondev | help | Yea, I looked into it a little while back and I was pretty impressed. Just using sublime/command line for now | 2018-01-05T15:32:54.000232 | Majorie | pythondev_help_Majorie_2018-01-05T15:32:54.000232 | 1,515,166,374.000232 | 27,891 |
pythondev | help | Microsoft just recently hired the developer who makes the Python extension in VSCode so I imagine the whole experience will get better as it goes | 2018-01-05T15:34:55.000125 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:34:55.000125 | 1,515,166,495.000125 | 27,892 |
pythondev | help | The debugging has improved since I've started using Python a few months ago | 2018-01-05T15:35:07.000274 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:35:07.000274 | 1,515,166,507.000274 | 27,893 |
pythondev | help | one of the nicer things about python is its one of the few free intellij IDEs, so there’s that too | 2018-01-05T15:35:15.000241 | Brande | pythondev_help_Brande_2018-01-05T15:35:15.000241 | 1,515,166,515.000241 | 27,894 |
pythondev | help | (not saying anything bad about vscode - im a big proponent of use what you like :slightly_smiling_face: ) | 2018-01-05T15:35:36.000611 | Brande | pythondev_help_Brande_2018-01-05T15:35:36.000611 | 1,515,166,536.000611 | 27,895 |
pythondev | help | most of the intellij ides have a free version? | 2018-01-05T15:36:38.000219 | Floy | pythondev_help_Floy_2018-01-05T15:36:38.000219 | 1,515,166,598.000219 | 27,896 |
pythondev | help | or am I wrong? | 2018-01-05T15:36:42.000507 | Floy | pythondev_help_Floy_2018-01-05T15:36:42.000507 | 1,515,166,602.000507 | 27,897 |
pythondev | help | nope, there are like 2? | 2018-01-05T15:36:49.000076 | Brande | pythondev_help_Brande_2018-01-05T15:36:49.000076 | 1,515,166,609.000076 | 27,898 |
pythondev | help | hence the “one of the few free” | 2018-01-05T15:36:56.000528 | Brande | pythondev_help_Brande_2018-01-05T15:36:56.000528 | 1,515,166,616.000528 | 27,899 |
pythondev | help | i think the only other free one is IDEA, and _maybe_ the go one but thats because its beta iirc | 2018-01-05T15:37:03.000395 | Brande | pythondev_help_Brande_2018-01-05T15:37:03.000395 | 1,515,166,623.000395 | 27,900 |
pythondev | help | ah, yeah. webstorm was a 30 day trial | 2018-01-05T15:37:28.000136 | Floy | pythondev_help_Floy_2018-01-05T15:37:28.000136 | 1,515,166,648.000136 | 27,901 |
pythondev | help | or on people’s .edu accounts :smile: | 2018-01-05T15:37:56.000552 | Brande | pythondev_help_Brande_2018-01-05T15:37:56.000552 | 1,515,166,676.000552 | 27,902 |
pythondev | help | ’-) | 2018-01-05T15:38:17.000343 | Floy | pythondev_help_Floy_2018-01-05T15:38:17.000343 | 1,515,166,697.000343 | 27,903 |
pythondev | help | Hrmm...so I figured out how to use the generator properly and get the value I wanted but it broke my len() usage. | 2018-01-05T15:38:36.000427 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:38:36.000427 | 1,515,166,716.000427 | 27,904 |
pythondev | help | who would do that... :sweat_smile: | 2018-01-05T15:38:38.000101 | Leanora | pythondev_help_Leanora_2018-01-05T15:38:38.000101 | 1,515,166,718.000101 | 27,905 |
pythondev | help | lol | 2018-01-05T15:39:09.000379 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:39:09.000379 | 1,515,166,749.000379 | 27,906 |
pythondev | help | <@Pandora> `len()` usage of what? | 2018-01-05T15:39:34.000199 | Brande | pythondev_help_Brande_2018-01-05T15:39:34.000199 | 1,515,166,774.000199 | 27,907 |
pythondev | help | A generator object | 2018-01-05T15:39:46.000125 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:39:46.000125 | 1,515,166,786.000125 | 27,908 |
pythondev | help | I’d also like to help, not just derail this | 2018-01-05T15:39:48.000009 | Brande | pythondev_help_Brande_2018-01-05T15:39:48.000009 | 1,515,166,788.000009 | 27,909 |
pythondev | help | there’s no way to get the length of a generator unless you want to consume it at the same time | 2018-01-05T15:40:30.000474 | Brande | pythondev_help_Brande_2018-01-05T15:40:30.000474 | 1,515,166,830.000474 | 27,910 |
pythondev | help | Looks as if there might be a `sum()` function | 2018-01-05T15:41:47.000246 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:41:47.000246 | 1,515,166,907.000246 | 27,911 |
pythondev | help | but you won’t know the length until it’s fully exhausted | 2018-01-05T15:41:53.000521 | Brande | pythondev_help_Brande_2018-01-05T15:41:53.000521 | 1,515,166,913.000521 | 27,912 |
pythondev | help | why do you need the length? | 2018-01-05T15:42:12.000494 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:42:12.000494 | 1,515,166,932.000494 | 27,913 |
pythondev | help | So I have a subscription reference object in a user model and I wanna check for the existence of this object as well as check that it is valid (it has a method that returns a Boolean)
`return self.oop_subscription and not self.oop_subscription.valid()`
This is how I'm doing this right now. Is there a better way to do... | 2018-01-05T15:42:29.000462 | Hank | pythondev_help_Hank_2018-01-05T15:42:29.000462 | 1,515,166,949.000462 | 27,914 |
pythondev | help | <@Garrett> I use one for simple text changes. If == 1 the text reads `email` if > 1 it reads `emailS` | 2018-01-05T15:43:22.000206 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:43:22.000206 | 1,515,167,002.000206 | 27,915 |
pythondev | help | `email(s)` | 2018-01-05T15:43:39.000716 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:43:39.000716 | 1,515,167,019.000716 | 27,916 |
pythondev | help | :wink: | 2018-01-05T15:43:41.000228 | Garrett | pythondev_help_Garrett_2018-01-05T15:43:41.000228 | 1,515,167,021.000228 | 27,917 |
pythondev | help | but I do have an instance that counts the number of attachments | 2018-01-05T15:43:46.000191 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:43:46.000191 | 1,515,167,026.000191 | 27,918 |
pythondev | help | <@Hank> you can set a value of `oop_subscription` in the `__init__` of the class, that way there is a default and you don’t have to check that it exists, only the `valid()` call | 2018-01-05T15:43:53.000385 | Brande | pythondev_help_Brande_2018-01-05T15:43:53.000385 | 1,515,167,033.000385 | 27,919 |
pythondev | help | Business logic is dependent on it not existing, actually. | 2018-01-05T15:44:44.000288 | Hank | pythondev_help_Hank_2018-01-05T15:44:44.000288 | 1,515,167,084.000288 | 27,920 |
pythondev | help | if the number of attachments is greater than 0 it continues the logic to extract them but if not it says no attachment founds and writes it to the log file | 2018-01-05T15:45:05.000411 | Pandora | pythondev_help_Pandora_2018-01-05T15:45:05.000411 | 1,515,167,105.000411 | 27,921 |
pythondev | help | okay, another option would be making `valid` a function you pass `self.oop_subscription` to, but you’ll still be checking for the existence there | 2018-01-05T15:45:47.000061 | Brande | pythondev_help_Brande_2018-01-05T15:45:47.000061 | 1,515,167,147.000061 | 27,922 |
pythondev | help | generally, though (moving forward), it is better to have business logic based on truthy/falsey values, not just existence. it makes for messy code sometimes | 2018-01-05T15:46:37.000293 | Brande | pythondev_help_Brande_2018-01-05T15:46:37.000293 | 1,515,167,197.000293 | 27,923 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.