workspace stringclasses 1
value | channel stringclasses 1
value | sentences stringlengths 1 3.93k | ts stringlengths 26 26 | user stringlengths 2 11 | sentence_id stringlengths 44 53 | timestamp float64 1.5B 1.56B | __index_level_0__ int64 0 106k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pythondev | help | not to sure about pep8 but this isnt readable.. as in it has got bigger problems than pep8.. | 2019-01-29T06:51:39.945300 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T06:51:39.945300 | 1,548,744,699.9453 | 4,921 |
pythondev | help | For your use case yes | 2019-01-29T06:55:33.945700 | Valeri | pythondev_help_Valeri_2019-01-29T06:55:33.945700 | 1,548,744,933.9457 | 4,922 |
pythondev | help | <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/#indentation> | 2019-01-29T07:04:13.946000 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T07:04:13.946000 | 1,548,745,453.946 | 4,923 |
pythondev | help | ```not_present_script = inter_freq_internal_freq['Script'].loc[
~(inter_freq_internal_freq['eNodeBName'].isin(sites_file['*eNodeB Name']))]``` | 2019-01-29T07:05:03.946400 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T07:05:03.946400 | 1,548,745,503.9464 | 4,924 |
pythondev | help | i would break from there but the `~(inter_freq_internal_freq['eNodeBName'].isin(sites_file['*eNodeB Name']))` is way long and is pretty much a separate thing | 2019-01-29T07:05:38.947100 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T07:05:38.947100 | 1,548,745,538.9471 | 4,925 |
pythondev | help | so i would assign that to a variable and then use that in the outer bit | 2019-01-29T07:05:54.947700 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T07:05:54.947700 | 1,548,745,554.9477 | 4,926 |
pythondev | help | ```dat_thing = ~(inter_freq_internal_freq['eNodeBName'].isin(sites_file['*eNodeB Name']))
not_present_script = inter_freq_internal_freq['Script'].loc[dat_thing]``` | 2019-01-29T07:06:49.948400 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T07:06:49.948400 | 1,548,745,609.9484 | 4,927 |
pythondev | help | and then break up that thing into something more understandable as well | 2019-01-29T07:08:08.949400 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T07:08:08.949400 | 1,548,745,688.9494 | 4,928 |
pythondev | help | idk, maybe this makes perfect sense in pandas world xD | 2019-01-29T07:08:24.949800 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T07:08:24.949800 | 1,548,745,704.9498 | 4,929 |
pythondev | help | my understanding is that a single line of code should do a single thing, this long line that you posted does like 3 nested lookups. I feel it would be simpler to follow if they were separate lines | 2019-01-29T07:10:47.951200 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T07:10:47.951200 | 1,548,745,847.9512 | 4,930 |
pythondev | help | Hi guys, I need some regex magic to extract the fraction from a string of the form `'123abc456/789' -> ('123abc', 456/789)` | 2019-01-29T07:15:44.952400 | Coleen | pythondev_help_Coleen_2019-01-29T07:15:44.952400 | 1,548,746,144.9524 | 4,931 |
pythondev | help | `re.findall(r'[a-z]+\d+\/\d+', data)` ? | 2019-01-29T07:35:16.953600 | Coleen | pythondev_help_Coleen_2019-01-29T07:35:16.953600 | 1,548,747,316.9536 | 4,932 |
pythondev | help | ah no that matches also the letter | 2019-01-29T07:42:07.954100 | Coleen | pythondev_help_Coleen_2019-01-29T07:42:07.954100 | 1,548,747,727.9541 | 4,933 |
pythondev | help | <https://regex101.com/> is really helpful for this kind of thing | 2019-01-29T07:50:02.956600 | Jonas | pythondev_help_Jonas_2019-01-29T07:50:02.956600 | 1,548,748,202.9566 | 4,934 |
pythondev | help | it's great to visualise the matches | 2019-01-29T07:50:47.958200 | Jonas | pythondev_help_Jonas_2019-01-29T07:50:47.958200 | 1,548,748,247.9582 | 4,935 |
pythondev | help | ```
regex = re.compile(r'(?P<state>\d+[a-z]+)(?P<frac>\d+\/\d+)')
m = regex.search(data)
print(m.group('state'), m.group('frac'))
``` | 2019-01-29T07:55:33.958400 | Coleen | pythondev_help_Coleen_2019-01-29T07:55:33.958400 | 1,548,748,533.9584 | 4,936 |
pythondev | help | I'm not sure how to explain this, but here's me trying; I have built an application that connects to Twitter's API and streams tweets which my application then analyses for sentiment. This is a continuous stream. Tweet volume, sentiment results and such are written to a db each minute. It works - until it doesn't.
Wha... | 2019-01-29T07:55:37.958500 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T07:55:37.958500 | 1,548,748,537.9585 | 4,937 |
pythondev | help | To the more experienced people on here, can you smell where the issue might be? This is a snippet of my try/except | 2019-01-29T07:58:54.959300 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T07:58:54.959300 | 1,548,748,734.9593 | 4,938 |
pythondev | help | do you have any logging output ? | 2019-01-29T07:59:48.959700 | Jimmy | pythondev_help_Jimmy_2019-01-29T07:59:48.959700 | 1,548,748,788.9597 | 4,939 |
pythondev | help | Only whats inside the `try` block, when the initial connection to Twitter happens | 2019-01-29T08:00:41.960900 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:00:41.960900 | 1,548,748,841.9609 | 4,940 |
pythondev | help | does it spam it? | 2019-01-29T08:00:52.961100 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:00:52.961100 | 1,548,748,852.9611 | 4,941 |
pythondev | help | ```2019-01-29 17:13:27,744:INFO:Stream connected
2019-01-29 18:48:21,621:INFO:Stream connected
2019-01-29 18:55:16,013:INFO:Stream connected
``` | 2019-01-29T08:01:07.961600 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:01:07.961600 | 1,548,748,867.9616 | 4,942 |
pythondev | help | It does not <@Leida> | 2019-01-29T08:01:19.961900 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:01:19.961900 | 1,548,748,879.9619 | 4,943 |
pythondev | help | Should I add a `continue` in the end of my `except` blocks? | 2019-01-29T08:01:39.962700 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:01:39.962700 | 1,548,748,899.9627 | 4,944 |
pythondev | help | you have some exception that falls through the current catching | 2019-01-29T08:01:54.963200 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:01:54.963200 | 1,548,748,914.9632 | 4,945 |
pythondev | help | Or am I not catching the errors | 2019-01-29T08:02:05.963600 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:02:05.963600 | 1,548,748,925.9636 | 4,946 |
pythondev | help | Yeah that could be | 2019-01-29T08:02:13.963900 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:02:13.963900 | 1,548,748,933.9639 | 4,947 |
pythondev | help | How can I catch all, for the purpose of finding it? | 2019-01-29T08:02:26.964300 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:02:26.964300 | 1,548,748,946.9643 | 4,948 |
pythondev | help | Would this work? | 2019-01-29T08:05:01.966500 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:05:01.966500 | 1,548,749,101.9665 | 4,949 |
pythondev | help | that would do it | 2019-01-29T08:05:15.966900 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:05:15.966900 | 1,548,749,115.9669 | 4,950 |
pythondev | help | only your while loop keeps on going | 2019-01-29T08:05:23.967200 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:05:23.967200 | 1,548,749,123.9672 | 4,951 |
pythondev | help | stream.disconnect() disconnects but does stream.filter() connect? | 2019-01-29T08:07:21.968100 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:07:21.968100 | 1,548,749,241.9681 | 4,952 |
pythondev | help | I'm pretty sure it does, but can't be 100% due to lack of proper logging in the past | 2019-01-29T08:08:53.968900 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:08:53.968900 | 1,548,749,333.9689 | 4,953 |
pythondev | help | what triggers your db write tho? | 2019-01-29T08:10:06.969700 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:10:06.969700 | 1,548,749,406.9697 | 4,954 |
pythondev | help | an uncaught exception would break the while loop and that bit of code stops, if you have some external db write that does the write without regard to whether it has data or not could explain the 0's | 2019-01-29T08:11:22.971700 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:11:22.971700 | 1,548,749,482.9717 | 4,955 |
pythondev | help | I know this is not best practice but the logic is as follow; I use global variables.
1) These are updated as data is processed
2) Then a while loop read those globals and writes to the db
3) globals are reset
4) while loop sleeps for x seconds
5) repeat | 2019-01-29T08:13:32.973500 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:13:32.973500 | 1,548,749,612.9735 | 4,956 |
pythondev | help | None | 2019-01-29T08:15:16.974000 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:15:16.974000 | 1,548,749,716.974 | 4,957 |
pythondev | help | and you have some threading so that you can have two blocking while loops going? | 2019-01-29T08:17:11.975600 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:17:11.975600 | 1,548,749,831.9756 | 4,958 |
pythondev | help | Well, no | 2019-01-29T08:17:59.976500 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:17:59.976500 | 1,548,749,879.9765 | 4,959 |
pythondev | help | I sort of started writing this app two weeks after I starting my programming journey | 2019-01-29T08:19:23.978400 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:19:23.978400 | 1,548,749,963.9784 | 4,960 |
pythondev | help | anyway the main point is that an uncaught exception jumps out of your reading while loop and no new data goes into your globals | 2019-01-29T08:19:44.979000 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:19:44.979000 | 1,548,749,984.979 | 4,961 |
pythondev | help | Full of bad practice and not knowing exactly what I'm doing | 2019-01-29T08:19:52.979300 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:19:52.979300 | 1,548,749,992.9793 | 4,962 |
pythondev | help | Exactly | 2019-01-29T08:19:59.979700 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:19:59.979700 | 1,548,749,999.9797 | 4,963 |
pythondev | help | catch the exception that does this and fix the problem | 2019-01-29T08:21:05.980600 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:21:05.980600 | 1,548,750,065.9806 | 4,964 |
pythondev | help | On it | 2019-01-29T08:21:26.981300 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:21:26.981300 | 1,548,750,086.9813 | 4,965 |
pythondev | help | try not to keep a catch-all in your code, would add to the list of bad ideas ^^ | 2019-01-29T08:21:41.981900 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:21:41.981900 | 1,548,750,101.9819 | 4,966 |
pythondev | help | Absolutely, only using it now for testing so I can find the ninja exception so I can add it to the small list of specific exceptions | 2019-01-29T08:22:44.983200 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:22:44.983200 | 1,548,750,164.9832 | 4,967 |
pythondev | help | Could you shed some light on threading and why not having it is a bad idea when using two while loops? | 2019-01-29T08:23:01.983600 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:23:01.983600 | 1,548,750,181.9836 | 4,968 |
pythondev | help | threading is not a good idea for you right now, so not having it is good :smile: | 2019-01-29T08:23:34.984300 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:23:34.984300 | 1,548,750,214.9843 | 4,969 |
pythondev | help | i just cant tell how you can have two blocking while loops going, unless they are nested ^^ | 2019-01-29T08:24:13.985100 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:24:13.985100 | 1,548,750,253.9851 | 4,970 |
pythondev | help | One while loop is inside a function. The second is not. If that answers your Q | 2019-01-29T08:26:13.986500 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:26:13.986500 | 1,548,750,373.9865 | 4,971 |
pythondev | help | None | 2019-01-29T08:27:34.986600 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:27:34.986600 | 1,548,750,454.9866 | 4,972 |
pythondev | help | now im confused how it enters any data besides the first time atall :smile: | 2019-01-29T08:29:21.987600 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:29:21.987600 | 1,548,750,561.9876 | 4,973 |
pythondev | help | `There's a way to force conda to download packages only from pypi?`
this was the question maybe you missed it out | 2019-01-29T08:29:29.987800 | Alicia | pythondev_help_Alicia_2019-01-29T08:29:29.987800 | 1,548,750,569.9878 | 4,974 |
pythondev | help | you run the script, definitions are loaded and then the code hits if __name__ line which calls main() | 2019-01-29T08:29:57.988600 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:29:57.988600 | 1,548,750,597.9886 | 4,975 |
pythondev | help | the main contains an endless loop that wont stop unless some error that you are not catching break it | 2019-01-29T08:30:23.989200 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:30:23.989200 | 1,548,750,623.9892 | 4,976 |
pythondev | help | and only then should the writing to database loop start | 2019-01-29T08:30:38.989600 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:30:38.989600 | 1,548,750,638.9896 | 4,977 |
pythondev | help | in the while run: bit do you call main() again somewhere? | 2019-01-29T08:31:46.990900 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:31:46.990900 | 1,548,750,706.9909 | 4,978 |
pythondev | help | No | 2019-01-29T08:32:11.991100 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:32:11.991100 | 1,548,750,731.9911 | 4,979 |
pythondev | help | That while loop that starts off at line 32 runs every 60 second | 2019-01-29T08:33:00.991400 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:33:00.991400 | 1,548,750,780.9914 | 4,980 |
pythondev | help | Since the variable `run` is always True, and to the best of my knowledge can't turn False: the while loop will never stop. And in the first line of the while loop it has a sleep statement | 2019-01-29T08:34:45.992700 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:34:45.992700 | 1,548,750,885.9927 | 4,981 |
pythondev | help | That sleep statement has a variable which is set to 60 seconds | 2019-01-29T08:35:10.993100 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:35:10.993100 | 1,548,750,910.9931 | 4,982 |
pythondev | help | Does that make sense or am I missing some core concepts here? | 2019-01-29T08:36:25.994000 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:36:25.994000 | 1,548,750,985.994 | 4,983 |
pythondev | help | the sleep() blocks the thread, this should not enable the other loop to run any further | 2019-01-29T08:36:27.994100 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:36:27.994100 | 1,548,750,987.9941 | 4,984 |
pythondev | help | interesting. Well it does run for quite some time. Sometimes days, sometimes hours | 2019-01-29T08:37:06.994900 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:37:06.994900 | 1,548,751,026.9949 | 4,985 |
pythondev | help | hmmm | 2019-01-29T08:37:56.995900 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:37:56.995900 | 1,548,751,076.9959 | 4,986 |
pythondev | help | my initial guess was that your second loop calls main again and that an error that causes it to stop would enable a write to the database, but i dont see that anywhere | 2019-01-29T08:37:58.996000 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:37:58.996000 | 1,548,751,078.996 | 4,987 |
pythondev | help | do you call the script itself in a loop somewhere? | 2019-01-29T08:38:07.996300 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:38:07.996300 | 1,548,751,087.9963 | 4,988 |
pythondev | help | I do not | 2019-01-29T08:39:00.996600 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:39:00.996600 | 1,548,751,140.9966 | 4,989 |
pythondev | help | The last loop in this script is a for loop which is inside of a class I have, but that deals with sentiment analysis (textblob) and does not call this script | 2019-01-29T08:39:59.997500 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:39:59.997500 | 1,548,751,199.9975 | 4,990 |
pythondev | help | Yeah I got that | 2019-01-29T08:41:17.997700 | Valeri | pythondev_help_Valeri_2019-01-29T08:41:17.997700 | 1,548,751,277.9977 | 4,991 |
pythondev | help | I was wondering what lead you into doing this | 2019-01-29T08:41:27.997900 | Valeri | pythondev_help_Valeri_2019-01-29T08:41:27.997900 | 1,548,751,287.9979 | 4,992 |
pythondev | help | Maybe if you shared that we could have a better simpler solution? | 2019-01-29T08:41:54.998400 | Valeri | pythondev_help_Valeri_2019-01-29T08:41:54.998400 | 1,548,751,314.9984 | 4,993 |
pythondev | help | did the last paste of code contain code from multiple sources? | 2019-01-29T08:41:56.998600 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:41:56.998600 | 1,548,751,316.9986 | 4,994 |
pythondev | help | No | 2019-01-29T08:43:35.998800 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:43:35.998800 | 1,548,751,415.9988 | 4,995 |
pythondev | help | All the snippets have been from the same script | 2019-01-29T08:43:46.999100 | Conchita | pythondev_help_Conchita_2019-01-29T08:43:46.999100 | 1,548,751,426.9991 | 4,996 |
pythondev | help | there is some magic going on that i dont see from the pastes but basically in the `start_stream()` there is an uncaught exception so that the while loop breaks and the global state does not get updated. Since there is a break statement in the successful running of `stream.filter()` means that something needs to call th... | 2019-01-29T08:48:49.001200 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:48:49.001200 | 1,548,751,729.0012 | 4,997 |
pythondev | help | what ever the exception is calling `stream.filter()` does not fix it | 2019-01-29T08:49:06.001700 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:49:06.001700 | 1,548,751,746.0017 | 4,998 |
pythondev | help | so i would assume the problem is with the authentication becoming invalid | 2019-01-29T08:49:23.002100 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:49:23.002100 | 1,548,751,763.0021 | 4,999 |
pythondev | help | <@Conchita> Why don't you allow your code to break and then figure out what went wrong? | 2019-01-29T08:53:23.004700 | Valeri | pythondev_help_Valeri_2019-01-29T08:53:23.004700 | 1,548,752,003.0047 | 5,000 |
pythondev | help | Basically get rid of all the exceptions and see why your code broke | 2019-01-29T08:54:09.005500 | Valeri | pythondev_help_Valeri_2019-01-29T08:54:09.005500 | 1,548,752,049.0055 | 5,001 |
pythondev | help | Also, relying on a exceptions to perform tasks is a bad idea imo | 2019-01-29T08:54:41.006500 | Valeri | pythondev_help_Valeri_2019-01-29T08:54:41.006500 | 1,548,752,081.0065 | 5,002 |
pythondev | help | You're probably just being rate limited maybe? | 2019-01-29T08:55:17.007500 | Valeri | pythondev_help_Valeri_2019-01-29T08:55:17.007500 | 1,548,752,117.0075 | 5,003 |
pythondev | help | there is mention of async in the code so that some part may well die while the rest keeps on running | 2019-01-29T08:55:28.007600 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T08:55:28.007600 | 1,548,752,128.0076 | 5,004 |
pythondev | help | Yeah | 2019-01-29T08:56:27.008100 | Valeri | pythondev_help_Valeri_2019-01-29T08:56:27.008100 | 1,548,752,187.0081 | 5,005 |
pythondev | help | Also, why don't you verify your data before writing to the database? | 2019-01-29T08:57:11.009200 | Valeri | pythondev_help_Valeri_2019-01-29T08:57:11.009200 | 1,548,752,231.0092 | 5,006 |
pythondev | help | As in they're non-zero entries | 2019-01-29T08:57:33.009900 | Valeri | pythondev_help_Valeri_2019-01-29T08:57:33.009900 | 1,548,752,253.0099 | 5,007 |
pythondev | help | <http://docs.tweepy.org/en/v3.4.0/streaming_how_to.html#a-few-more-pointers> | 2019-01-29T08:57:47.010100 | Hiroko | pythondev_help_Hiroko_2019-01-29T08:57:47.010100 | 1,548,752,267.0101 | 5,008 |
pythondev | help | suggests you’re using the wrong kwarg for streaming | 2019-01-29T08:57:59.010500 | Hiroko | pythondev_help_Hiroko_2019-01-29T08:57:59.010500 | 1,548,752,279.0105 | 5,009 |
pythondev | help | you have `is_async`, the filter takes in an `async` kwarg | 2019-01-29T08:58:16.011000 | Hiroko | pythondev_help_Hiroko_2019-01-29T08:58:16.011000 | 1,548,752,296.011 | 5,010 |
pythondev | help | the documentation may be wrong tho, github on master has `is_async` | 2019-01-29T09:04:40.011500 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T09:04:40.011500 | 1,548,752,680.0115 | 5,011 |
pythondev | help | or the package is installed straight from git | 2019-01-29T09:07:26.012000 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T09:07:26.012000 | 1,548,752,846.012 | 5,012 |
pythondev | help | :facepalm: | 2019-01-29T09:08:09.012200 | Hiroko | pythondev_help_Hiroko_2019-01-29T09:08:09.012200 | 1,548,752,889.0122 | 5,013 |
pythondev | help | hey someone else might have mentioned this (I'm just scrolling through) but there is `logging.exception` which will automatically print the stack trace for you. So you can do something like:
```
except Exception:
logging.exception('An Error Occurred')
``` | 2019-01-29T09:08:16.012300 | Karoline | pythondev_help_Karoline_2019-01-29T09:08:16.012300 | 1,548,752,896.0123 | 5,014 |
pythondev | help | or just wrong version :smile: | 2019-01-29T09:08:49.012600 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T09:08:49.012600 | 1,548,752,929.0126 | 5,015 |
pythondev | help | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | 2019-01-29T09:08:52.012900 | Valeri | pythondev_help_Valeri_2019-01-29T09:08:52.012900 | 1,548,752,932.0129 | 5,016 |
pythondev | help | 3.4 does indeed have `async` 3.6 has `is_async` | 2019-01-29T09:09:07.013200 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T09:09:07.013200 | 1,548,752,947.0132 | 5,017 |
pythondev | help | cool thanks! | 2019-01-29T09:12:21.013300 | Arturo | pythondev_help_Arturo_2019-01-29T09:12:21.013300 | 1,548,753,141.0133 | 5,018 |
pythondev | help | ok so actually there is no exception to catch in `start_stream()` since it probably succeeds first time it is run and since `is_async` is `True` the `stream.filter()` is run on a separate thread | 2019-01-29T09:17:28.015100 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T09:17:28.015100 | 1,548,753,448.0151 | 5,019 |
pythondev | help | the library handles passing of data between threads internally | 2019-01-29T09:19:08.016600 | Leida | pythondev_help_Leida_2019-01-29T09:19:08.016600 | 1,548,753,548.0166 | 5,020 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.