| { |
| "model": "gpt-5.6-terra", |
| "pool_size": 388, |
| "seeds": [ |
| 20260821, |
| 20260822, |
| 20260823 |
| ], |
| "sizes": [ |
| 4, |
| 3 |
| ], |
| "draws": { |
| "20260821": { |
| "picked": [ |
| "10. Lottery with x=$16.00:$0", |
| "4. Lottery:$1.50", |
| "2. Efficient", |
| "4. Lottery with x=$10.00:$0", |
| "6. I never settle for second best.", |
| "2. Lottery:$1.00", |
| "2. $10.00 in 2 weeks:$6.00 now" |
| ], |
| "channels": [ |
| { |
| "channel_id": "mixed_lottery_efficiency", |
| "definition": "A mixed set of hypothetical lottery choices with varying payoff amounts plus an item labeled \"Efficient\"; the wording does not establish a single coherent construct beyond possible sensitivity to monetary trade-offs, risk, or efficiency framing.", |
| "candidate_transformation": "Depending on responses, this channel could be associated with shifts in preference between a purchase option and alternatives when offers differ in payoff uncertainty, monetary value, or perceived efficiency, without implying a fixed direction.", |
| "scope": "Hypothetical monetary-choice settings and purchase contexts involving uncertain rewards, promotions, or efficiency-related comparisons.", |
| "anchors": [ |
| "10. Lottery with x=$16.00:$0", |
| "4. Lottery:$1.50", |
| "2. Efficient", |
| "4. Lottery with x=$10.00:$0" |
| ] |
| }, |
| { |
| "channel_id": "mixed_aspiration_risk_delay", |
| "definition": "A mixed set covering reluctance to accept second best, a lottery item, and a choice between money now versus a larger amount later; it does not cleanly measure one construct, though it may reflect a combination of aspiration, uncertainty tolerance, and timing preferences.", |
| "candidate_transformation": "Depending on responses, this channel might shift purchase decisions when products involve quality trade-offs, uncertain outcomes, immediate costs, or delayed benefits; the likely direction cannot be determined from the question wording alone.", |
| "scope": "Purchase decisions involving product quality comparisons, probabilistic incentives, financing, waiting, or delayed rewards.", |
| "anchors": [ |
| "6. I never settle for second best.", |
| "2. Lottery:$1.00", |
| "2. $10.00 in 2 weeks:$6.00 now" |
| ] |
| } |
| ], |
| "compiled": { |
| "routing_policy": [ |
| { |
| "channel_id": "mixed_lottery_efficiency", |
| "rule": "When the purchase decision makes uncertainty, promotional payoff variation, monetary trade-offs, or relative efficiency salient, use response patterns in this channel as a soft directional cue: patterns favoring higher expected value, greater tolerance of uncertain payoffs, or efficiency-oriented options may lower the threshold for the purchase option when it is comparatively value- or efficiency-advantaged, and may raise that threshold when alternatives hold that advantage. If the purchase context does not expose such a comparison, or the evidence is missing or conflicting, apply no shift." |
| }, |
| { |
| "channel_id": "mixed_aspiration_risk_delay", |
| "rule": "When the purchase decision involves a quality-versus-compromise choice, uncertain outcomes, an immediate cost versus delayed benefit, financing, or waiting, use response patterns in this channel as a soft directional cue: patterns indicating preference for higher quality, greater uncertainty tolerance, or willingness to wait for larger later value may lower the threshold for a purchase that better matches those features and raise it when an alternative better matches them. If those features are absent, or the evidence is missing or conflicting, apply no shift." |
| } |
| ], |
| "additive_control": "Apply each channel independently as a separate, soft prior on the purchase threshold and add only the applicable directional shifts. Do not require channels or their conditions to co-occur, do not create any joint trigger or joint penalty, do not multiply channel effects, and do not require all conditions to be present; missing or conflicting evidence for any channel is neutral for that channel." |
| }, |
| "validation_errors": [], |
| "normalization": "schema description echoed in the value; JSON extracted after the colon" |
| }, |
| "20260822": { |
| "picked": [ |
| "5. When I think about the kind of person I have been in the past, I'm not sure what I was really like.", |
| "11. I often become sad when watching sad things on TV or in films.", |
| "11. There have been times when I was quite jealous of the good fortune of others", |
| "6. Lottery:$2.00", |
| "9. I am mindful of what I own", |
| "12. Learning new ways to think doesn't excite me very much", |
| "12. It is often hard for me to make up my mind about things because I don't really know what I want." |
| ], |
| "channels": [ |
| { |
| "channel_id": "mixed_self_affect_lottery", |
| "definition": "No single coherent construct is apparent: the items span uncertainty about past identity, emotional response to sad media, jealousy of others' fortune, and a stated lottery amount.", |
| "candidate_transformation": "This mixed set may weakly relate to how a person reacts to emotionally salient, socially comparative, or chance-based purchase cues, but the direction and size of any purchase shift are not determined by the questions alone.", |
| "scope": "Potentially applies to emotionally framed, socially comparative, or gambling/lottery-related purchase contexts; otherwise unclear.", |
| "anchors": [ |
| "5. When I think about the kind of person I have been in the past, I'm not sure what I was really like.", |
| "11. I often become sad when watching sad things on TV or in films.", |
| "11. There have been times when I was quite jealous of the good fortune of others", |
| "6. Lottery:$2.00" |
| ] |
| }, |
| { |
| "channel_id": "ownership_novelty_decision_uncertainty", |
| "definition": "Appears to measure a combination of mindfulness about possessions, limited excitement about new ways of thinking, and uncertainty about one's own preferences when making decisions.", |
| "candidate_transformation": "May influence willingness to engage with novel options and confidence in choosing among products; depending on the offer and decision context, it could shift reliance on familiar possessions, simple choice aids, or deliberation.", |
| "scope": "Consumer decisions involving new or unfamiliar products, choices among alternatives, and ownership- or possession-related contexts.", |
| "anchors": [ |
| "9. I am mindful of what I own", |
| "12. Learning new ways to think doesn't excite me very much", |
| "12. It is often hard for me to make up my mind about things because I don't really know what I want." |
| ] |
| } |
| ], |
| "compiled": { |
| "routing_policy": [ |
| { |
| "channel_id": "mixed_self_affect_lottery", |
| "rule": "Apply only when the purchase context contains emotionally salient, social-comparison, or lottery/chance-based cues and the respondent’s observed responses consistently indicate engagement with the corresponding cue. In such a context, modestly lower the purchase threshold when the offer makes participation, emotional relevance, comparative standing, or chance-based value salient. If the cues are absent, the relevant responses are missing or conflicting, or the lottery response has no interpretable comparison basis, apply no shift." |
| }, |
| { |
| "channel_id": "ownership_novelty_decision_uncertainty", |
| "rule": "Apply to novel or unfamiliar products, multi-option choices, or possession-related decisions. When the respondent shows limited enthusiasm for new ways of thinking and uncertainty about preferences, raise the purchase threshold for unfamiliar or complex offers, especially when no clear choice aid is provided. When an offer clearly supports maintaining, organizing, or making deliberate use of valued possessions, and mindful ownership is the consistent relevant signal, modestly lower the purchase threshold. If these signals conflict, are missing, or the context is outside this scope, apply no shift." |
| } |
| ], |
| "additive_control": "Apply each channel independently as a separate, soft prior on the purchase threshold. Sum only the applicable directional shifts; do not require channels or conditions to co-occur, do not create any joint trigger or joint penalty, do not multiply effects, and do not treat the presence or absence of all conditions together as necessary for any shift. Missing, ambiguous, or conflicting evidence is neutral for the affected channel." |
| }, |
| "validation_errors": [], |
| "normalization": "schema description echoed in the value; JSON extracted after the colon" |
| }, |
| "20260823": { |
| "picked": [ |
| "8. $6.00 in 1 week:$6.00 now", |
| "5. I get caught up in other people’s feelings easily.", |
| "12. I feel good when I cooperate with others", |
| "2. I sometimes feel resentful when I don't get my way", |
| "10. $8.00 in 1 week:$9.00 now", |
| "2. Lottery:-$7.00", |
| "7. Lottery:-$3.75" |
| ], |
| "channels": [ |
| { |
| "channel_id": "mixed_affect_intertemporal", |
| "definition": "No single coherent construct is evident: the group combines an immediate-versus-delayed monetary tradeoff with items on emotional contagion, cooperation-related positive affect, and resentment when thwarted.", |
| "candidate_transformation": "Responses may weakly indicate that purchase choices are shaped by a combination of short-term timing preferences and interpersonal-affective tendencies, potentially altering the relative appeal of immediate costs or benefits in socially salient contexts.", |
| "scope": "Potentially applicable to purchase decisions involving delayed versus immediate payment or benefit, especially where social interaction or emotional reactions are salient.", |
| "anchors": [ |
| "8. $6.00 in 1 week:$6.00 now", |
| "5. I get caught up in other people’s feelings easily.", |
| "12. I feel good when I cooperate with others", |
| "2. I sometimes feel resentful when I don't get my way" |
| ] |
| }, |
| { |
| "channel_id": "monetary_risk_delay_tradeoffs", |
| "definition": "The group appears to measure monetary decision preferences under delay and uncertain losses, including willingness to trade present versus delayed amounts and sensitivity to lottery-based negative outcomes.", |
| "candidate_transformation": "Responses may indicate how a person weights immediate versus delayed monetary outcomes and certain versus probabilistic losses, which could shift preference among payment timing, guarantees, insurance-like options, or risky purchase alternatives.", |
| "scope": "Applicable to purchase decisions with installment or delayed-payment options, uncertain financial consequences, warranties or insurance, and risky versus more predictable alternatives.", |
| "anchors": [ |
| "10. $8.00 in 1 week:$9.00 now", |
| "2. Lottery:-$7.00", |
| "7. Lottery:-$3.75" |
| ] |
| } |
| ], |
| "compiled": { |
| "routing_policy": [ |
| { |
| "channel_id": "mixed_affect_intertemporal", |
| "rule": "When the purchase decision makes immediate versus delayed costs or benefits salient and also contains a meaningful social or emotional context, responses indicating stronger preference for immediate monetary outcomes or stronger affective reactivity may softly shift the decision toward options with more immediate perceived benefits or away from options with delayed, socially uncomfortable, or emotionally aversive consequences. Responses indicating weaker such tendencies may softly shift in the opposite direction. If timing, social-emotional relevance, or response direction is missing or conflicting, apply no shift." |
| }, |
| { |
| "channel_id": "monetary_risk_delay_tradeoffs", |
| "rule": "When the purchase decision involves payment timing, uncertain monetary consequences, guarantees, warranties, insurance-like protection, or a choice between risky and predictable alternatives, responses indicating greater weighting of immediate outcomes, certain losses, or protection from uncertain losses may softly shift the decision toward immediate, more predictable, or protected options; responses indicating greater tolerance for delayed outcomes or uncertain losses may softly shift toward delayed, less protected, or riskier options. If the relevant decision features or response direction are missing or conflicting, apply no shift." |
| } |
| ], |
| "additive_control": "Apply each channel independently as a separate soft prior on the purchase decision threshold. Sum only the applicable directional shifts, without requiring any channels or conditions to occur together. Do not create a joint trigger or joint penalty, do not multiply channel effects, and do not infer an effect from the absence of another channel; missing, inapplicable, or conflicting evidence for any channel is neutral." |
| }, |
| "validation_errors": [], |
| "normalization": "schema description echoed in the value; JSON extracted after the colon" |
| } |
| } |
| } |
