sileod commited on
Commit
6ec3f6b
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 19593b6

Clarify typed-decision coverage and provenance

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +80 -176
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
1
  ---
2
- pretty_name: tasksource-jev
3
  language:
4
  - multilingual
5
  license: other
@@ -14,194 +14,98 @@ tags:
14
  - runtime-defined-decisions
15
  - decision-models
16
  - multiple-choice
17
- size_categories:
18
- - 100K<n<1M
19
  ---
20
 
21
- # tasksource-jev
22
-
23
- `tasksource-jev` recasts Tasksource classification, multiple-choice, and selected
24
- token-classification datasets
25
- as runtime-defined decisions. Each example supplies its state and candidate
26
- criteria at inference time. The dataset is intended for training and evaluating
27
- bounded decision models; it is not tied to one Jev implementation.
28
-
29
- This is an independent data transformation. It is not an official TypeSafe Jev
30
- dataset and is not produced by or affiliated with TypeSafe or OpenJev.
31
-
32
- The current release is capped at 500,000 decisions across English and
33
- multilingual tasks. Build reports identify completed and failed source tasks.
34
-
35
- ## Schema
36
-
37
- | field | type | meaning |
38
- |---|---|---|
39
- | `id` | string | Stable identifier derived from task, split, and row index. |
40
- | `group_id` | string | Identifies decisions derived from the same source row. |
41
- | `question_id` | string | Identifies a question within that group. |
42
- | `kind` | string | System One primitive: `choice`, `noul`, or `score`. |
43
- | `options` | list of strings | Candidate labels or answers supplied at runtime. Order is significant. |
44
- | `target` | list of floats | One-hot target distribution aligned with `options`. |
45
- | `state` | string | Text or question on which the decision is based. Token decisions include the sentence, marked target, and target index. |
46
- | `question` | string | The decision requested from the model. |
47
- | `source` | string | Tasksource task identifier used to load the source data. |
48
- | `variant` | string | Direct decision or a named deterministic subrecast. |
49
- | `split` | string | Source split normalized to `train`, `dev`, or `test`. |
50
-
51
- Classification criteria are the source task's label names. Multiple-choice
52
- criteria are the answer choices. Every source row is retained as a direct
53
- `choice` for classification and multiple choice. For selected token tasks, at
54
- most two token questions are sampled deterministically from each source
55
- sequence; one non-`O` token is preferred when available. BIO/BILOU boundaries
56
- and compact POS or dependency labels are expanded into readable criteria.
57
- Only `Sequence(ClassLabel)` or equivalent `List(ClassLabel)` ontologies with
58
- 2–32 readable labels qualify. This release includes CoNLL-2003 NER and WNUT-17
59
- token decisions from checked data-only mirrors; see
60
- [token-source-status.md](token-source-status.md) for the source audit and backlog.
61
- The `group_id` lets several questions share one source row without a costly
62
- global grouping pass. A deterministic augmentation pass adds label-verification `noul`
63
- questions to about 5% of rows. Ordered-rubric `score` augmentation is available
64
- for genuinely ordinal sources but is disabled by default. Native regression and
65
- ordinal recasting will be used for score examples rather than imposing an order
66
- on nominal classification labels.
67
-
68
- In the canonical Tasksource recast, related token rows also carry
69
- `shared_state`, `source_row`, and distinct `question_id` values. Pass rows from
70
- one `source_row` to `render_systemone_group(rows)` to obtain a single Jev
71
- request with several questions over the same sentence. The Parquet view keeps
72
- one decision per row so it can be shuffled, sampled, or streamed normally.
73
-
74
- ### Graded sources
75
-
76
- Sources labelled with ratings, annotator fractions, or vote distributions are
77
- recast natively rather than dropped (sources `graded/<family>`, defined in
78
- `src/tasksource/jev/graded.py`). Ordinal ratings become `score` questions
79
- with stated levels (HelpSteer, essay grading, app stars, JOCI plausibility),
80
- bounded quantities become `noul` rescaled to [0, 1] (STS similarity, SICK
81
- relatedness, acceptability, OASST and Civil Comments annotator rates), and
82
- ChaosNLI's 100 votes become a soft `choice` target. Sibling annotations of one
83
- input share a state: a HelpSteer response carries five `score` questions, an
84
- OASST reply thirteen `noul` questions, a Civil Comments comment seven.
85
-
86
- ### Procedural sources
87
-
88
- About 10% of each split comes from
89
- [`tasksource/procedural-jev`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/tasksource/procedural-jev)
90
- (sources `procedural-jev/<config>`): generated JSON states with two or three
91
- native questions each, mixing `choice`, `noul` (including exact posterior
92
- probabilities), and `score` over ordered rubrics. Every question over a state
93
- shares its `group_id`, and the cap keeps groups whole. These rows are never
94
- augmented, so their wording is exactly as generated.
95
-
96
- ### Deterministic subrecasts
97
-
98
- The release adds conservative, low-frequency variants while retaining every
99
- direct row:
100
-
101
- | variant | default rate | purpose |
102
- |---|---:|---|
103
- | `label_verification` | 5% | A `noul` judgement asking whether a deterministically proposed label is correct. Correct and incorrect proposals are balanced. |
104
- | `criteria_permutation` | 5% | The same `choice` decision with options and targets permuted together, reducing option-position shortcuts. |
105
- | `instruction_paraphrase` | 5% | The same decision with a manually vetted equivalent instruction. Common NLI and sentiment label groups receive specific wording; other tasks use conservative generic alternatives. |
106
- | `paired_text_format` | 5% of paired rows | Neutral alternatives to repeated `text_A`/`text_B` field labels, without assuming a task-specific relation between the texts. |
107
-
108
- All transformations are derived exactly from the source target and introduce no
109
- teacher-generated claims. Candidate-subset decisions are a possible later
110
- addition. Synthetic uncertainty, abstention, and nominal-to-ordinal conversions
111
- are intentionally excluded because one-hot classification labels do not justify
112
- them.
113
- For `noul`, `target` contains the scalar truth probability and `options` is empty;
114
- for `choice` and `score`, `target` is aligned with `options`. The direct answer
115
- and criteria are unchanged; lower-frequency variants are identified by
116
- `variant`. In the published view, paired-text field names also use
117
- deterministic, hand-written alternatives (`First text` / `Second text`,
118
- `Passage A` / `Passage B`, or `A` / `B`) to reduce repeated `text_A` / `text_B`
119
- boilerplate. Common direct question wording is likewise chosen from vetted
120
- equivalents without adding rows. The canonical recast remains fixed.
121
 
122
  ```python
123
  from datasets import load_dataset
124
 
125
- dataset = load_dataset("tasksource/tasksource-jev")
126
- row = dataset["train"][0]
127
- answer = row["options"][max(range(len(row["target"])), key=row["target"].__getitem__)]
128
  ```
129
 
130
- With Tasksource installed, the same representation can be produced directly:
131
-
132
- ```python
133
- from tasksource import load_task, render_systemone
134
-
135
- dataset = load_task("glue/rte", recast="jev")
136
- request = render_systemone(dataset["train"][0], model="openjev")
137
- ```
138
-
139
- ## Construction
140
-
141
- Tasksource standardizes heterogeneous datasets into common classification and
142
- multiple-choice templates. This release applies `recast_jev` to compatible
143
- English and multilingual tasks, retains the standard train/validation/test splits, and records the
144
- Tasksource identifier in every row. Tasks that fail to download or preprocess
145
- are recorded by the build report rather than silently represented as complete.
146
- To keep very large sources balanced, the build caps each task at 30,000
147
- training rows and 3,000 validation or test rows using Tasksource's deterministic
148
- sampling (seed 0). The published release is capped at 500,000 rows using a
149
- source-balanced 90/5/5 train/dev/test allocation. It samples complete
150
- source-row groups, so related token and augmentation questions remain together,
151
- and preserves relative row order.
152
-
153
- For a useful Dataset Viewer preview, only the first 1,000 training rows are
154
- ordered round-robin by `source`, with a deterministic mix of direct,
155
- instruction, and paired-format variants where available. This changes display
156
- order, not membership. After that prefix, remaining examples retain their
157
- relative order.
158
-
159
- BIG-bench, MMLU, and BLiMP are excluded from this release. Original split
160
- identity is preserved in `split`, with `validation` normalized to `dev`.
161
-
162
- The repository includes `failed-tasks.json` and `outdated-datasets.json`.
163
- The latter specifically tracks upstream datasets that still depend on loading
164
- scripts no longer supported by current Hugging Face Datasets, so they can be
165
- migrated to data-only Parquet repositories and incorporated in a later build.
166
-
167
- The build is resumable from the Tasksource repository; the
168
- [Jev build runbook](https://github.com/sileod/tasksource/blob/main/docs/jev/README.md)
169
- documents validation, publication, and the limits of exact reproducibility:
170
-
171
- ```bash
172
- PYTHONPATH=.:src python scripts/build_jev_dataset.py --output build/tasksource-jev --finalize
173
- ```
174
-
175
- ## Licensing and provenance
176
-
177
- Tasksource is a preprocessing framework and catalog, not the original publisher
178
- of the constituent datasets. Copyright, license, and usage restrictions remain
179
- those of each upstream dataset. Users should consult the upstream dataset card
180
- identified by `source` before redistributing or using a subset. The aggregate is
181
- therefore marked `license: other`; no single license is asserted over all rows.
182
 
183
  ## Citation
184
 
185
- If this recast is useful, cite Tasksource, which provides the task collection and
186
- harmonization framework:
187
 
188
  ```bibtex
189
  @inproceedings{sileo-2024-tasksource,
190
- title = "tasksource: A Large Collection of {NLP} tasks with a Structured Dataset Preprocessing Framework",
191
- author = "Sileo, Damien",
192
- editor = "Calzolari, Nicoletta and
193
- Kan, Min-Yen and
194
- Hoste, Veronique and
195
- Lenci, Alessandro and
196
- Sakti, Sakriani and
197
- Xue, Nianwen",
198
- booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024)",
199
- month = may,
200
- year = "2024",
201
- address = "Torino, Italia",
202
- publisher = "ELRA and ICCL",
203
- url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.1361/",
204
- pages = "15655--15684",
205
- abstract = "The HuggingFace Datasets Hub hosts thousands of datasets, offering exciting opportunities for language model training and evaluation. However, datasets for a specific task type often have different structures, making harmonization challenging which prevents the interchangeable use of comparable datasets. As a result, multi-task training or evaluation necessitates manual work to fit data into task templates. Several initiatives independently tackle this issue by releasing harmonized datasets or providing harmonization codes to preprocess datasets into a consistent format. We identify patterns in such preprocessings, such as column renaming, or more complex patterns. We then propose an annotation framework that enables concise, readable, and reusable preprocessing annotations. tasksource annotates more than 600 task preprocessings and provides a backend to automate dataset alignment. We fine-tune a multi-task text encoder on all tasksource tasks, outperforming every publicly available text encoder of comparable parameter count according to an external evaluation."
206
  }
207
  ```
 
1
  ---
2
+ pretty_name: tasksource-jev-typed-decisions
3
  language:
4
  - multilingual
5
  license: other
 
14
  - runtime-defined-decisions
15
  - decision-models
16
  - multiple-choice
 
 
17
  ---
18
 
19
+ # tasksource-jev-typed-decisions
20
+
21
+ Hundreds of source tasks, one typed-decision format. This dataset recasts
22
+ Tasksource's broad collection of NLP datasets as decisions whose criteria are
23
+ supplied with each example, rather than fixed in a model head. Much of that
24
+ breadth comes from human-written or human-annotated English and multilingual
25
+ data: classification, question answering, and selected token tasks. The
26
+ source catalog now also includes newly sourced
27
+ [IT support tickets](https://huggingface.co/datasets/tasksource/it-support-tickets)
28
+ with seven categories assigned by support professionals. A separate procedural
29
+ slice adds multi-question states and calibrated targets; it is identified by its
30
+ `procedural-jev/` source prefix, not presented as human-authored data.
31
+
32
+ This is useful when training a decision model to handle *new label sets at
33
+ runtime*: the same columns cover sentiment, inference, intent, entity tags,
34
+ ticket routing, graded judgments, and more. Tasksource supplies the breadth;
35
+ the Jev recast supplies a consistent `state + question + criteria → target`
36
+ interface. The project is independent of TypeSafe and OpenJev.
37
+
38
+ ## Data at a glance
39
+
40
+ | column | meaning |
41
+ |---|---|
42
+ | `state` | Text or structured input to judge. |
43
+ | `question` | What to decide about that state. |
44
+ | `kind` | `choice`, `noul` (truth probability), or `score` (ordered levels). |
45
+ | `options` | Runtime criteria for `choice`/`score`; empty for `noul`. |
46
+ | `target` | Distribution aligned with `options`, or one probability for `noul`. |
47
+ | `source`, `split`, `variant` | Provenance, original train/dev/test identity, and transformation. |
48
+ | `id`, `group_id`, `question_id` | Decision identity and questions sharing a source example. |
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
49
 
50
  ```python
51
  from datasets import load_dataset
52
 
53
+ ds = load_dataset("tasksource/tasksource-jev-typed-decisions")
54
+ row = ds["train"][0]
55
+ print(row["state"], row["question"], row["options"], row["target"])
56
  ```
57
 
58
+ Most Tasksource classification targets are one-hot. Native graded sources add
59
+ soft distributions or ordinal scores where the original annotation supports
60
+ them; no uncertainty is invented from a hard label. Selected CoNLL-2003 and
61
+ WNUT-17 token tasks ask at most two readable BIO-tag questions per sentence.
62
+ Several questions can share a `group_id`; Parquet keeps one decision per row
63
+ for easy streaming and shuffling. The
64
+ [procedural source](https://huggingface.co/datasets/tasksource/procedural-jev)
65
+ contributes `choice`, `noul`, and `score` questions over shared states.
66
+
67
+ Deterministic, low-frequency variants include label verification, criterion
68
+ permutation, vetted instruction paraphrases, and paired-text field wording.
69
+ The `variant` column identifies them. The source's direct decision remains in
70
+ the data. The first 1,000 training rows are interleaved for a more useful
71
+ Dataset Viewer preview; this changes order, not membership.
72
+
73
+ The release builder targets up to one million rows with a 90/5/5
74
+ train/dev/test allocation. It balances source *families* while sampling their
75
+ configs, keeps multi-question groups intact, and excludes BIG-bench, MMLU,
76
+ and BLiMP. Consult the Hub split counts for the currently published size.
77
+
78
+ ## Provenance and limits
79
+
80
+ Tasksource harmonizes the source datasets; it does not own their content.
81
+ Human-authored, crowd-annotated, and procedural rows should not be treated as
82
+ interchangeable evidence. Use `source` to inspect the original dataset and
83
+ its license before reuse. The aggregate has `license: other` because no single
84
+ upstream license covers every row. The ticket source, for example, is the
85
+ [Benitez Pereira collection](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7648117), not
86
+ synthetic ticket text.
87
+
88
+ Some upstream tasks fail to load or preprocess; the build records those
89
+ failures instead of implying complete coverage. The builder writes
90
+ `failed-tasks.json`, `fixed-source-audit.json`, `build-manifest.json`, and
91
+ `release-audit.json`. The
92
+ [build runbook](https://github.com/sileod/tasksource/blob/main/docs/jev/README.md)
93
+ documents the resumable Parquet pipeline, validation, and reproducibility
94
+ boundary. For an uncapped canonical recast, use
95
+ `load_task("glue/rte", recast="jev")` in Tasksource.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
96
 
97
  ## Citation
98
 
99
+ If this recast is useful, cite the Tasksource collection and preprocessing
100
+ framework:
101
 
102
  ```bibtex
103
  @inproceedings{sileo-2024-tasksource,
104
+ title = {tasksource: A Large Collection of {NLP} tasks with a Structured Dataset Preprocessing Framework},
105
+ author = {Sileo, Damien},
106
+ booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024)},
107
+ year = {2024},
108
+ pages = {15655--15684},
109
+ url = {https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.1361/}
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
110
  }
111
  ```