Say what a score means, so a user can tell whether theirs is good
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -126,6 +126,24 @@ needs the repository as well.
|
|
| 126 |
The weight column sums to the full split size by construction. That is the property the dataset
|
| 127 |
exists for, and it is asserted at build time and again on every load.
|
| 128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 129 |
## Quickstart
|
| 130 |
|
| 131 |
```python
|
|
|
|
| 126 |
The weight column sums to the full split size by construction. That is the property the dataset
|
| 127 |
exists for, and it is asserted at build time and again on every load.
|
| 128 |
|
| 129 |
+
## What a score means here
|
| 130 |
+
|
| 131 |
+
So you can tell whether your number is any good. All HT-weighted, so all describing the full
|
| 132 |
+
split rather than these few thousand rows.
|
| 133 |
+
|
| 134 |
+
| | HI-Small | LI-Small |
|
| 135 |
+
|---|---:|---:|
|
| 136 |
+
| Supervised ensemble, detection F1 | 70.9 | 29.6 |
|
| 137 |
+
| Seven open-weight LLMs | 40.7 to 50.7 | 40.6 to 50.7 |
|
| 138 |
+
| Their typology macro-F1 | 5.6 to 18.4 | 2.5 to 13.0 |
|
| 139 |
+
| Best ML and LLM hybrid | 87.4 | 84.9 |
|
| 140 |
+
|
| 141 |
+
The LLM band is the finding, not a weak result to beat: under the 1:2 design ratio a
|
| 142 |
+
predict-all-illicit guess scores about 50, so every model in that band is at the floor. Recall
|
| 143 |
+
reaches 100% and precision sits near a third. Per-model tables, the prompting variants and the
|
| 144 |
+
hybrid's construction are in the
|
| 145 |
+
[repository](https://github.com/nat-nischw/AMLCompact#what-you-are-up-against).
|
| 146 |
+
|
| 147 |
## Quickstart
|
| 148 |
|
| 149 |
```python
|