natnitaract commited on
Commit
efb70fa
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 8164054

Uses / Direct Use / Out-of-Scope Use, per the card template

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +6 -2
README.md CHANGED
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ the block above mirrors it, kept here so the card stands alone.
222
  population it stands for. Under the 1:2 design ratio a predict-all-illicit guess scores about
223
  50% F1 unweighted and 0.25% weighted, which is the whole distance between the two frames.
224
 
225
- ## Contents
226
 
227
  `load_dataset` pulls only `data/`, which is 31.7 MiB. A `git clone` pulls everything,
228
  which is 1.11 GiB, almost all of it supervised model weights. Six file families were missing
@@ -341,11 +341,15 @@ weight that maps a metric computed here onto the full split.
341
 
342
  ## Uses
343
 
344
- **Direct use.** Scoring a detector on a transaction-graph AML benchmark whose weighted
 
 
345
  metrics stand in for a million-edge split; measuring where a prompt change acts, using the
346
  four-step rubric rather than a single F1 number; and building selective ML-and-LLM routers
347
  against a fixed evaluation design. It is a research benchmark and a measurement instrument.
348
 
 
 
349
  **Not for deployment, and the paper's own numbers are the argument.** Restoring the native
350
  prevalence by Horvitz-Thompson weighting puts every one of the fourteen evaluated LLM cells on
351
  the trivial predict-all baseline: F1 between 0.23 and 0.25 on HI-Small against a floor of 0.25,
 
222
  population it stands for. Under the 1:2 design ratio a predict-all-illicit guess scores about
223
  50% F1 unweighted and 0.25% weighted, which is the whole distance between the two frames.
224
 
225
+ ## Files and licences
226
 
227
  `load_dataset` pulls only `data/`, which is 31.7 MiB. A `git clone` pulls everything,
228
  which is 1.11 GiB, almost all of it supervised model weights. Six file families were missing
 
341
 
342
  ## Uses
343
 
344
+ ### Direct Use
345
+
346
+ Scoring a detector on a transaction-graph AML benchmark whose weighted
347
  metrics stand in for a million-edge split; measuring where a prompt change acts, using the
348
  four-step rubric rather than a single F1 number; and building selective ML-and-LLM routers
349
  against a fixed evaluation design. It is a research benchmark and a measurement instrument.
350
 
351
+ ### Out-of-Scope Use
352
+
353
  **Not for deployment, and the paper's own numbers are the argument.** Restoring the native
354
  prevalence by Horvitz-Thompson weighting puts every one of the fourteen evaluated LLM cells on
355
  the trivial predict-all baseline: F1 between 0.23 and 0.25 on HI-Small against a floor of 0.25,