Uses / Direct Use / Out-of-Scope Use, per the card template
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ the block above mirrors it, kept here so the card stands alone.
|
|
| 222 |
population it stands for. Under the 1:2 design ratio a predict-all-illicit guess scores about
|
| 223 |
50% F1 unweighted and 0.25% weighted, which is the whole distance between the two frames.
|
| 224 |
|
| 225 |
-
##
|
| 226 |
|
| 227 |
`load_dataset` pulls only `data/`, which is 31.7 MiB. A `git clone` pulls everything,
|
| 228 |
which is 1.11 GiB, almost all of it supervised model weights. Six file families were missing
|
|
@@ -341,11 +341,15 @@ weight that maps a metric computed here onto the full split.
|
|
| 341 |
|
| 342 |
## Uses
|
| 343 |
|
| 344 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 345 |
metrics stand in for a million-edge split; measuring where a prompt change acts, using the
|
| 346 |
four-step rubric rather than a single F1 number; and building selective ML-and-LLM routers
|
| 347 |
against a fixed evaluation design. It is a research benchmark and a measurement instrument.
|
| 348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 349 |
**Not for deployment, and the paper's own numbers are the argument.** Restoring the native
|
| 350 |
prevalence by Horvitz-Thompson weighting puts every one of the fourteen evaluated LLM cells on
|
| 351 |
the trivial predict-all baseline: F1 between 0.23 and 0.25 on HI-Small against a floor of 0.25,
|
|
|
|
| 222 |
population it stands for. Under the 1:2 design ratio a predict-all-illicit guess scores about
|
| 223 |
50% F1 unweighted and 0.25% weighted, which is the whole distance between the two frames.
|
| 224 |
|
| 225 |
+
## Files and licences
|
| 226 |
|
| 227 |
`load_dataset` pulls only `data/`, which is 31.7 MiB. A `git clone` pulls everything,
|
| 228 |
which is 1.11 GiB, almost all of it supervised model weights. Six file families were missing
|
|
|
|
| 341 |
|
| 342 |
## Uses
|
| 343 |
|
| 344 |
+
### Direct Use
|
| 345 |
+
|
| 346 |
+
Scoring a detector on a transaction-graph AML benchmark whose weighted
|
| 347 |
metrics stand in for a million-edge split; measuring where a prompt change acts, using the
|
| 348 |
four-step rubric rather than a single F1 number; and building selective ML-and-LLM routers
|
| 349 |
against a fixed evaluation design. It is a research benchmark and a measurement instrument.
|
| 350 |
|
| 351 |
+
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 352 |
+
|
| 353 |
**Not for deployment, and the paper's own numbers are the argument.** Restoring the native
|
| 354 |
prevalence by Horvitz-Thompson weighting puts every one of the fourteen evaluated LLM cells on
|
| 355 |
the trivial predict-all baseline: F1 between 0.23 and 0.25 on HI-Small against a floor of 0.25,
|