File size: 18,999 Bytes
853d8c9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3688d57
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
853d8c9
 
 
 
 
3688d57
853d8c9
d8ba40e
 
3688d57
853d8c9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7bd0abb
 
 
853d8c9
 
 
 
 
 
3688d57
 
 
853d8c9
 
 
d8ba40e
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
853d8c9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3688d57
 
 
7bd0abb
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
853d8c9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
d8ba40e
3688d57
 
d8ba40e
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3688d57
d8ba40e
 
 
 
3688d57
 
d8ba40e
 
853d8c9
3688d57
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
853d8c9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3688d57
 
 
 
853d8c9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
d8ba40e
 
 
3688d57
d8ba40e
853d8c9
d8ba40e
 
853d8c9
d8ba40e
 
3688d57
 
 
d8ba40e
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
853d8c9
d8ba40e
853d8c9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
d8ba40e
 
3688d57
 
 
 
d8ba40e
 
 
 
 
 
853d8c9
 
 
d8ba40e
 
 
 
 
853d8c9
 
 
 
3688d57
 
 
 
 
853d8c9
 
 
 
3688d57
 
 
 
853d8c9
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
---
name: detection-bootstrap
description: Bootstrap an object-detection dataset and a small trained detector from images that have NO labels — zero-shot label with Falcon-Perception, validate, convert, then fine-tune a compact Apache-licensed model, all on Hugging Face Jobs. Runs fully autonomously or with human review checkpoints. Use when you have an image collection and want a detector but no annotations exist.
---

# Bootstrap a detector from unlabeled images

The loop: **zero-shot teacher labels → validate → convert → train a small student → evaluate → publish.**
Every step is a self-contained UV script from
[`uv-scripts/object-detection`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/object-detection) on the
Hugging Face Hub, or a `hf jobs` command. `--help` works on every script.

## Pick your path

Five decisions cover most runs; each routes into the numbered steps below.

1. **Where are the images?** Dataset repo → `falcon-perception.py`. Bucket → `falcon-perception-bucket.py`
   (reads `.jpg`/`.jpeg`/`.png` only — convert JPEG 2000 / TIFF first).
2. **Transport to the trainer**: build canonical `train.parquet` / `validation.parquet` with
   `embed-bucket-images.py` (images embedded, gold excluded and asserted). Trainers that take HF
   datasets read the parquet directly — including straight off a bucket; trainers that want a COCO
   directory tree get one **generated in-job** with `materialize-coco.py` — onto a bucket mount if
   more than one job will train on it (a complete tree is reused, not rebuilt). Never hand-assemble
   or upload directory trees: a tree generated from the parquet cannot have missing-image
   mismatches. Run `smoke-test.py` first (free, local, ~30 s): it proves these plumbing scripts
   still produce correct output before a paid job depends on them.
3. **Boxes or masks?** Boxes → the D-FINE default in step 5. Masks → an RF-DETR-Seg-style trainer via
   `materialize-coco.py` (RLE masks carried through and resized from the teacher's inference frame to the
   image frame).
4. **Human available?** Show step-1 previews and do the step-6 gold slice. Headless → numeric proxies
   and say **unreviewed**.
5. **After the first student**: run the step-6 loop — student over the teacher-empty pages at a low
   threshold, VLM pre-triage, retrain on the corrections.

## Check if a human in the loop

You can use the approach outlined in this skill with or without a human in the loop.

- **With a human in the loop** (better models): show them the step-1 previews — "is the teacher boxing
  the right things?" is the highest-value question, and its fix is the cheapest (a better query and a re-run of the teacher). Then train on a small slice first (500–1k images) and show 20 rendered
  predictions before spending on the full corpus. If corrections are worth collecting at volume, run a
  review pass with `review-detections.py` (keyboard accept/reject in the browser — quick mode for
  whole-image verdicts in random order with quotable rates, boxes mode for per-box rejects; pushes a
  `review` column), fold corrections in and retrain. Diff the corrected set against the first pass (`diff-hf-datasets.py`) to measure how
  good the zero-shot pass actually was.
- **Autonomously** (headless): don't pause for review — use the numeric proxies, and say **unreviewed**
  in the final report and model card.

## 1. Sense-check the class name before spending GPU money (free)

Falcon-Perception queries are **class names, not instructions** ("photograph" works; "the photographs,
excluding captions" returns nothing), and **one class per run** (combined queries collapse — run per
class and merge on `image_id`). Model details: `hf models card tiiuae/Falcon-Perception`.

Check cheaply on 3 images before any full pass. The teacher (Falcon-Perception) is a **0.6B model,
1.3 GB download** — it runs on a CUDA GPU (fast), Apple Silicon (MLX backend auto-selected, about 6 s/image),
or plain CPU (slow, but fine for 3 images). Run the check wherever is practical for you:

```
# locally, if your machine can:
uv run https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/object-detection/raw/main/falcon-perception.py \
  --dataset <USER>/<IMAGES> --limit 3 --query photograph --preview

# or the same check as a small job (previews don't persist on Jobs — push a tiny dataset instead).
# l4x1 is the cheapest flavor that fits the engine (see step 2's flavor rule):
hf jobs uv run --flavor l4x1 --secrets HF_TOKEN \
  https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/object-detection/raw/main/falcon-perception.py \
  --dataset <USER>/<IMAGES> --limit 3 --query photograph --out <USER>/<NAME>-check --private
```

Judge the result before scaling up:
- **If you can view images**, look at the rendered previews (or the pushed check dataset) — are the
  right things boxed? `render-detections.py` renders any dataset in this schema and **pixel-verifies
  its own output** (a page with instances whose render equals the source exits nonzero — silent
  blank-overlay bugs are real and have been shown to humans as "done").
- **If you can't**, compare instance counts across candidate queries (`stats-hf-dataset.py` below works
  on a pushed check dataset): near-zero instances/image means the class name is wrong for this material —
  try a synonym (`photograph` / `illustration` / `figure` / `cartoon`). Suspiciously many (more than about 10/image)
  *can* mean the query is matching layout blocks — but dense plates genuinely carry 10–20 figures,
  so counts are a fallback signal only; previews are the judge.
- Measured on real material, previews judged:

  | material | worked | partial | dud |
  |---|---|---|---|
  | historic newspaper pages (b/w scans) | `photograph`, `illustration` | | |
  | book / encyclopaedia plates | `illustration` (incl. dense multi-figure plates) | `caption` (good on true plates, grabs whole text columns on text-heavy pages) | `figure` (0 hits on the same pages) |
- **No vision at all?** A vision-capable subagent can judge the previews if you can spawn one;
  otherwise tell the user the check ran unviewed.

(Falcon-Perception has a custom architecture, so it can't be served as an OpenAI-compatible endpoint —
iterate via the batch script. If you swap in a teacher that vLLM can serve, a temporary hot server on
Jobs is the faster way to iterate on queries: see
[Serve Models on Jobs](https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/jobs-serving).)

## 2. Teacher pass on Jobs

```
hf jobs uv run --flavor a10g-large --secrets HF_TOKEN --timeout 2h \
  https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/object-detection/raw/main/falcon-perception.py \
  --dataset <USER>/<IMAGES> --query photograph --out <USER>/<NAME>-photograph --private
```

- Sizing: expect a few images per second, not tens — the pass is decode-bound, so a bigger GPU
  changes little; to go faster, shard the file list across several jobs writing to the same output
  bucket. `--limit` on either script caps a run.
- Flavor rule (all three failures measured): the engine needs a **24 GB-VRAM GPU** (16 GB T4s
  CUDA-OOM during prefill) and **more than 15 GB host RAM** (the engine sizes itself from the GPU
  and ignores host RAM, so `t4-small` and `a10g-small` are OOMKilled before the first image).
  `hf jobs hardware --json` lists every flavor's `ram`, accelerator and price — `l4x1` is the
  cheapest fit (fine for the step-1 check); `a10g-large` is faster for a corpus pass.
- One job per class (step 1's rule). Every run labels its boxes `category` 0 in a single-name
  `ClassLabel`, so a naive concat collapses the classes — renumber each run to its index in a
  combined `ClassLabel` when merging. Rows align on `image_id` (every run contains every image):

  ```python
  from datasets import ClassLabel, Sequence, load_dataset

  names = ["illustration", "map"]
  parts = [load_dataset(f"<USER>/<NAME>-{n}", split="train") for n in names]
  extra = [dict(zip(ds["image_id"], ds["objects"])) for ds in parts[1:]]

  def merge(row):
      o = {k: list(v) for k, v in row["objects"].items()}
      for i, run in enumerate(extra, start=1):
          r = run[row["image_id"]]
          o["bbox"] += r["bbox"]; o["area"] += r["area"]
          o["rectangularity"] += r["rectangularity"]
          o["category"] += [i] * len(r["bbox"])
      return {"objects": o, "n_instances": len(o["bbox"])}

  feats = parts[0].features.copy()
  feats["objects"]["category"] = Sequence(ClassLabel(names=names))
  merged = parts[0].map(merge, features=feats)
  ```

  (`masks_rle` concatenates the same way if you need the masks.)
- Output schema: `objects.bbox` in **YOLO format** (normalized center x, y, w, h), `objects.category`
  (a `ClassLabel` named after the query), `objects.area`, `objects.rectangularity`, plus `image`,
  `image_id`, `width`, `height`.
- There are **no confidence scores** (the model has none). `rectangularity` (mask area ÷ box area) is the
  triage proxy: values near 0 are usually junk, 0.785 is a circle, 1.0 a full rectangle.
- Submit with `--detach` (returns the job id immediately), then block on completion with
  `hf jobs wait <id> [<id> ...] --timeout 2h` — it exits 0 only if every job succeeded, so it
  chains cleanly into the next step. `hf jobs logs <id>` / `hf jobs inspect <id>` for progress and errors.
- A job can sit in SCHEDULING while the flavor queue drains — that is a queue, not a failure.
  **Don't resubmit**: a second copy racing to the same `--out` just doubles the bill. If you do
  switch (`hf jobs hardware` for alternatives), cancel the queued copy first (`hf jobs cancel <id>`).
- For images in a [storage bucket](https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/storage-buckets) instead of a
  dataset, use `falcon-perception-bucket.py` — it writes resumable parquet parts back to a bucket
  (kill and re-run the same command; done keys are skipped). It reads `.jpg` / `.jpeg` / `.png` only —
  convert JPEG 2000 or TIFF scans first, or it will silently find zero images:

  ```
  hf jobs uv run --flavor a10g-large --secrets HF_TOKEN --timeout 2h --detach \
    https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/object-detection/raw/main/falcon-perception-bucket.py \
    --src <namespace>/<bucket> --prefix <path/under/bucket> \
    --out <namespace>/<out-bucket> --query illustration
  ```

  Publish once at the end so the parts feed the rest of this loop (parquet stores `category` as
  bare ints; the cast attaches the class name):

  ```python
  from datasets import ClassLabel, Image, Sequence, load_dataset
  ds = load_dataset("parquet", data_files="hf://buckets/<namespace>/<out-bucket>/part-*.parquet",
                    split="train")
  feats = ds.features.copy()
  feats["objects"]["category"] = Sequence(ClassLabel(names=[ds[0]["query"]]))
  if "image" in feats:  # parts written with --embed-images: make the bytes a decodable Image column
      feats["image"] = Image()
  ds.cast(feats).push_to_hub("<namespace>/<dataset>")
  ```

  The bucket path's output is **annotations-only** by default — there is no `image` column, and the
  step-5 trainer and `review-detections.py` both need embedded images. `embed-bucket-images.py` (same
  repo) joins the bytes back in, drops the teacher's error rows, excludes and asserts the gold slice,
  splits train/validation, and writes the final schema exactly once — to a dataset repo, or as `train.parquet`/`validation.parquet`
  in a bucket. (`--embed-images` on the teacher pass writes the bytes into the parts instead — storage
  is cheap, and the join step then skips its re-fetch; the cost is a copy of the corpus in the output
  bucket.) Trainers that want a COCO directory tree get one generated from that parquet by
  `materialize-coco.py` — once, onto a bucket mount if several jobs will train on it — never
  hand-assemble or upload directory trees.

## 3. Validate the labels (free, local)

```
uv run https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/object-detection/raw/main/validate-hf-dataset.py \
  <USER>/<NAME>-photograph --bbox-format yolo
uv run https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/object-detection/raw/main/stats-hf-dataset.py \
  <USER>/<NAME>-photograph --bbox-format yolo
```

Expect **VALID** with 0 out-of-bounds and 0 zero-area boxes. `W001` warnings on empty images are normal
and worth keeping as training signal — but treat them as **unverified negatives**: zero-shot teachers
miss real instances on a meaningful fraction of "empty" pages (a third, on one measured corpus). The
step-6 loop is how you find and flip them.
Drop obvious junk before training: degenerate slivers (extreme aspect ratio + tiny area) and near-duplicate
boxes (IoU > 0.9 within one image).

## 4. Convert YOLO → COCO for training (free, local)

Trainers expect COCO `xywh` pixels; the teacher emits YOLO normalized. One command:

```
uv run https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/object-detection/raw/main/convert-hf-dataset.py \
  <USER>/<NAME>-photograph <USER>/<NAME>-coco --from yolo --to coco_xywh
```

## 5. Train a small detector

A known-good default: fine-tune
[`ustc-community/dfine-small-coco`](https://huggingface.co/ustc-community/dfine-small-coco)
(D-FINE small, 10.4M params, Apache-2.0, in `transformers`) on the step-4 COCO dataset —
800 images, 30 epochs, `t4-medium`, about 48 minutes (`hf jobs hardware` shows current prices). Training needs only a T4:
step 2's 24 GB-VRAM rule is the teacher's engine, not the student's.

The [**`huggingface-vision-trainer`**](https://github.com/huggingface/skills/tree/main/skills/huggingface-vision-trainer)
skill runs the training end to end (dataset validation,
augmentation, mAP eval, Hub persistence) — install it with `hf skills add huggingface-vision-trainer`
if you don't have it, and follow its object-detection path with the `<USER>/<NAME>-coco` dataset and
the settings above. Hold out the validation split — and the step-6 gold slice — BEFORE training,
and never train on either. Write checkpoints **continuously to the synced `/data` mount**, not `/tmp`
or a local output dir: Jobs can be SIGTERM'd at any time (node reclaim, requeue), anything outside the
mount dies with the job, and durable checkpoints are also what make stopping at a plateau safe.

Other trainers work — the dataset is plain COCO. [RT-DETRv2](https://huggingface.co/PekingU/rtdetr_v2_r18vd)
is a comparable compact Apache-2.0 pick; [RF-DETR](https://github.com/roboflow/rf-detr) (Apache-2.0,
DINOv2 backbone) is a good starter, and its Seg variant can learn from the teacher's `masks_rle`
masks. Check the license fits the use — `hf models card <id>` shows it; flag restrictive licenses
(e.g. ultralytics/YOLO is AGPL) to the user rather than deciding for them. Explore further:
[transformers object-detection models](https://huggingface.co/models?pipeline_tag=object-detection&library=transformers&sort=trending) ·
[ultralytics-library models](https://huggingface.co/models?library=ultralytics).

Decode `masks_rle` like this — each RLE lives in its own frame, which never matches the
recorded width/height:

```python
import json, numpy as np
from PIL import Image
from pycocotools import mask as mask_utils

for rle in json.loads(row["masks_rle"]):
    seg = mask_utils.decode({**rle, "counts": rle["counts"].encode()})  # frame = rle["size"]
    if seg.shape != (row["height"], row["width"]):
        seg = np.asarray(Image.fromarray(seg).resize((row["width"], row["height"]), Image.NEAREST))
```

## 6. Evaluate honestly

- Report mAP on the held-out slice. Be clear about what it measures: **agreement with the teacher**,
  not accuracy against human truth — no human labels exist in this loop unless you make some (next
  bullet).
- **Gold slice** (with a human in the loop): hold out about 100 random images BEFORE training — keyed
  on a **stable image id** that is identical in every dataset you build (path prefixes from different
  runs silently break the match) — and **assert the exclusion** before submitting any training job:
  train count = total − gold, overlap = 0. Then have
  the human verify every box on them with `review-detections.py --mode boxes --order random`, then
  correct any misses (the tool flags them with M; drawing the missing boxes is manual for now).
  Then report TWO numbers: mAP vs teacher labels AND mAP vs the human gold. They
  differ, and the gap is the finding — in the validation run of this skill: 0.84 vs teacher labels
  but 0.44 vs human gold, both mAP@50 on held-out pages. That gap is the teacher's systematic
  divergence from human annotators, which teacher-agreement alone cannot see.
- The student can at best match its teacher (measured on a comparable loop: student 97.4% vs teacher
  95.0% human-acceptable on the same sample). The point of distilling is **throughput and cost**
  (10–100× cheaper per image than the teacher), not accuracy gains.
- Evaluate with the model card's decode contract, and write that contract INTO the card (input
  padding, score handling — with one class use the raw logit/sigmoid, never softmax). This is
  load-bearing: a standard decode against a padded-square model measured 0.03 mAP where the
  documented decode measured 10× higher. (Evaluating locally on Apple Silicon: pass the trainer's
  eval a CPU device — the COCO eval path uses float64, which MPS lacks.)
- Spot-check 20 or so predictions visually before calling it done — or, if running without a human and you
  cannot view images, state prominently in the report that the model is **unreviewed**.
- It can make sense to run this process in a loop: predict → review (a human, or a vision-capable
  agent, via `review-detections.py`) → retrain on the corrections → review again, until the acceptance
  rate stops improving. Two things make the loop cheap: point the student at the **teacher-empty pages
  at a low threshold** first (that is where the teacher's false negatives concentrate, and flipping
  them from negative to positive is the biggest training-signal win), and **pre-triage candidates with
  a VLM judge** (one crop per instance, mask highlighted) so the human only reviews the uncertain
  residue rather than every candidate.

## 7. Publish with honest provenance

Push the model and dataset — ask the user whether public or private; if you can't ask, default to
private and say so. Build each dataset's **final schema in memory and push once** — never stage an
intermediate push to the repo you will publish. A second push with different columns leaves the repo's
stored features stale and `load_dataset` fails with a cast error; if the schema must change, push to a
new repo id. The cards must state: labels are **zero-shot weak labels** from Falcon-Perception
(name the script + date), which filters ran, and that **recall is unmeasured** unless you measured it
against an independent source. Say what the model is for and what it was trained on. A model trained
this way is a first pass. The review loop above is how it gets better.