al1729 commited on
Commit
91b83a2
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): b777e8b

Add dataset card

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +78 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,4 +1,16 @@
1
  ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2
  dataset_info:
3
  features:
4
  - name: value
@@ -19,3 +31,69 @@ configs:
19
  - split: train
20
  path: data/train-*
21
  ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
  ---
2
+ license: cc-by-4.0
3
+ language:
4
+ - en
5
+ pretty_name: ValueMap-Olmo-32B
6
+ size_categories:
7
+ - n<1K
8
+ tags:
9
+ - values
10
+ - alignment
11
+ - persona-vectors
12
+ - interpretability
13
+ - taxonomy
14
  dataset_info:
15
  features:
16
  - name: value
 
31
  - split: train
32
  path: data/train-*
33
  ---
34
+
35
+ # ValueMap-Olmo-32B
36
+
37
+ A functional taxonomy of 266 AI-assistant values, from the paper *Predicting Alignment
38
+ Generalization with Value Representations*. The 266 values are the level-1 sub-clusters
39
+ of [Values in the Wild](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Anthropic/values-in-the-wild).
40
+ They are grouped into four clusters by how the values are **represented inside a model**
41
+ (OLMo-3.1-32B-Instruct-SFT), not by what the values are about.
42
+
43
+ Code: https://github.com/andyjliu/value-generalization
44
+
45
+ ## Schema
46
+
47
+ One row per value:
48
+
49
+ | column | description |
50
+ |---|---|
51
+ | `value` | short name, a slug of the Values in the Wild L1 cluster name |
52
+ | `cluster` | one of `Attunement`, `Rigor`, `Integrity`, `Stewardship` |
53
+ | `description` | the one-sentence value description the persona vectors were extracted from |
54
+
55
+ ```python
56
+ from datasets import load_dataset
57
+ ds = load_dataset("value-generalization/ValueMap-Olmo-32B", split="train")
58
+ ```
59
+
60
+ ## Clusters
61
+
62
+ Each cluster is named after its medoid value.
63
+
64
+ | cluster | medoid | # values |
65
+ |---|---|---|
66
+ | Attunement | `personal_growth` | 70 |
67
+ | Rigor | `structured_and_methodical_reasoning` | 55 |
68
+ | Integrity | `professional_ethics_and_integrity` | 52 |
69
+ | Stewardship | `risk_management` | 89 |
70
+
71
+ ## How it was built
72
+
73
+ 1. **Value descriptions.** Each Values in the Wild L1 sub-cluster comes with a
74
+ description written by Anthropic. An LLM compressed each one into a one-sentence,
75
+ present-tense statement of how an assistant behaves when it holds the value (e.g.
76
+ `accessibility`: "using inclusive communication and representation to enable equal
77
+ participation and acceptance…"). The keys are slugs of the original L1 names. One
78
+ name appears under two L2 parents, so the second copy has its L2 parent's slug
79
+ added as a suffix.
80
+ 2. **Persona vectors.** One persona vector per value, extracted from
81
+ OLMo-3.1-32B-Instruct-SFT with the
82
+ [persona vectors](https://github.com/safety-research/persona_vectors) recipe:
83
+ take the difference of mean response-token activations between responses that
84
+ express the value and responses that do not (`response_avg_diff` pooling), at
85
+ layer 32.
86
+ 3. **Clustering.** We computed the 266×266 cosine-similarity grid of these vectors
87
+ and partitioned it with k-medoids at k=4.
88
+
89
+ In the paper, this partition predicts which values move together when a model is
90
+ DPO-trained toward one of them, and it does so better than chance. The Values in the Wild
91
+ L3 categories do not reach significance on the same test. A Qwen3-8B extraction of
92
+ the same 266 values gives a highly similar grid (Spearman ρ = 0.82 over off-diagonal
93
+ cells).
94
+
95
+ ## Citation
96
+
97
+ If you use this dataset, please cite the paper *Predicting Alignment Generalization
98
+ with Value Representations*, and Values in the Wild (Huang et al., 2025), which the
99
+ value list is derived from.