vnmoorthy commited on
Commit
fc85c35
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 96e1582

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +30 -22
README.md CHANGED
@@ -23,71 +23,79 @@ pretty_name: PAVO-Bench
23
  size_categories:
24
  - 10K<n<100K
25
  ---
26
-
27
  # PAVO-Bench: 50K-Turn Benchmark for ASR-LLM-TTS Pipeline Routing
28
-
29
  **Authors:** NarasingaMoorthy VeiluKanthaPerumal (University of Pennsylvania); Mohammed Imthathullah (Google)
30
-
31
  > **Note on the dataset viewer:** PAVO-Bench is distributed as a set of JSON
32
  > result files with heterogeneous schemas (tier-level statistics, coupling
33
  > matrices, ablation tables, etc.), so the HF auto-viewer is disabled. Download
34
  > the individual files directly via `huggingface_hub` (see Usage below).
35
-
36
  ## Description
37
-
38
  PAVO-Bench is a comprehensive benchmark suite for evaluating **ASR-LLM-TTS voice pipeline routing** decisions. It provides 50,000 turns of benchmark data designed to measure how well different pipeline configurations balance **latency**, **quality**, **cost**, and **energy consumption** when routing spoken-language queries through cascaded Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), Large Language Model (LLM), and Text-to-Speech (TTS) components.
39
-
40
  The benchmark is organized into three tiers of increasing scale and complexity, plus component-level ablation studies. All results were produced on GPU hardware.
41
-
42
  ## Dataset Files
43
-
44
  ### Tier 1 -- Unit-Level Validation
45
-
46
  | File | Description |
47
  |------|-------------|
48
  | `tier1_statistical_results.json` | Statistical reproducibility results across 5 trials of 1,000 turns each (seeds 42, 123, 456, 789, 1024). Reports mean, std, and 95% confidence intervals for PAVO latency, quality, cost, and energy metrics. |
49
  | `tier1_coupling_results.json` | Coupling constraint validation measuring LLM quality degradation as a function of ASR word-error rate (WER 0--20%) using llama3.1:8b. |
50
  | `tier1_llm_latency_results.json` | LLM latency profiling for llama3.1:8b across short (50 token), medium (200 token), and long (500 token) generation contexts. Reports total latency, time-to-first-token, and tokens/second. |
51
-
52
  ### Tier 2 -- Integration-Level Evaluation
53
-
54
  | File | Description |
55
  |------|-------------|
56
  | `tier2_e2e_results.json` | End-to-end pipeline measurements for cloud_premium (whisper-large-v3 + llama3.1:8b) and edge_fast (whisper-tiny + gemma2:2b) configurations on 200 LibriSpeech samples. Includes per-stage latency breakdowns, sample ASR outputs, and sample LLM responses. |
57
  | `tier2_cross_dataset_results.json` | Cross-dataset ASR evaluation on LibriSpeech and FLEURS for whisper-large-v3 and whisper-tiny models (200 samples each). Reports WER and latency statistics. |
58
  | `tier2_noise_robustness_results.json` | ASR robustness under white noise at SNR levels 5--30 dB, plus clean baseline. Reports WER degradation across noise conditions. |
59
-
60
  ### Tier 3 -- Scale Evaluation
61
-
62
  | File | Description |
63
  |------|-------------|
64
  | `tier3_50k_summary.json` | Summary statistics for the full 50,000-turn PAVO-Bench dataset: 40K train / 10K test split, complexity distribution (levels 1--5), generation time, and error rate. |
65
  | `tier3_scaling_results.json` | LLM scaling benchmarks across multiple models (gemma2:2b, llama3.1:8b, etc.) with simple, medium, and complex query types. Reports latency, throughput, and real-time suitability. |
66
-
67
  ### Component Analysis
68
-
69
  | File | Description |
70
  |------|-------------|
71
  | `component_ablation_results.json` | Ablation study comparing PAVO-Full, PAVO-NoCoupling, and other ablated configurations. Reports latency, quality, cost, energy, coupling violations, and infeasible percentages. |
72
  | `supervised_baseline_results.json` | Supervised vs. RL routing comparison on 100K synthetic state vectors with oracle routing labels. Reports accuracy, top-3 accuracy, cost gap vs. oracle, decision latency, and training time for Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, MLP (cross-entropy), and MLP (PPO). |
73
-
74
  ## Usage
75
-
76
  ### Load individual JSON files directly
77
-
78
  ```python
79
  import json
80
  from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
81
-
82
  # Download a specific results file
83
  path = hf_hub_download(
84
  repo_id="vnmoorthy/pavo-bench",
85
  filename="tier3_50k_summary.json",
86
  repo_type="dataset",
87
  )
88
-
89
  with open(path) as f:
90
  data = json.load(f)
91
-
92
  print(f"Total samples: {data['total_samples']}")
93
- print(f"Train/Test split: {data['train_samples']}/{data['test_samples']}")
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
23
  size_categories:
24
  - 10K<n<100K
25
  ---
 
26
  # PAVO-Bench: 50K-Turn Benchmark for ASR-LLM-TTS Pipeline Routing
 
27
  **Authors:** NarasingaMoorthy VeiluKanthaPerumal (University of Pennsylvania); Mohammed Imthathullah (Google)
 
28
  > **Note on the dataset viewer:** PAVO-Bench is distributed as a set of JSON
29
  > result files with heterogeneous schemas (tier-level statistics, coupling
30
  > matrices, ablation tables, etc.), so the HF auto-viewer is disabled. Download
31
  > the individual files directly via `huggingface_hub` (see Usage below).
 
32
  ## Description
 
33
  PAVO-Bench is a comprehensive benchmark suite for evaluating **ASR-LLM-TTS voice pipeline routing** decisions. It provides 50,000 turns of benchmark data designed to measure how well different pipeline configurations balance **latency**, **quality**, **cost**, and **energy consumption** when routing spoken-language queries through cascaded Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), Large Language Model (LLM), and Text-to-Speech (TTS) components.
 
34
  The benchmark is organized into three tiers of increasing scale and complexity, plus component-level ablation studies. All results were produced on GPU hardware.
 
35
  ## Dataset Files
 
36
  ### Tier 1 -- Unit-Level Validation
 
37
  | File | Description |
38
  |------|-------------|
39
  | `tier1_statistical_results.json` | Statistical reproducibility results across 5 trials of 1,000 turns each (seeds 42, 123, 456, 789, 1024). Reports mean, std, and 95% confidence intervals for PAVO latency, quality, cost, and energy metrics. |
40
  | `tier1_coupling_results.json` | Coupling constraint validation measuring LLM quality degradation as a function of ASR word-error rate (WER 0--20%) using llama3.1:8b. |
41
  | `tier1_llm_latency_results.json` | LLM latency profiling for llama3.1:8b across short (50 token), medium (200 token), and long (500 token) generation contexts. Reports total latency, time-to-first-token, and tokens/second. |
 
42
  ### Tier 2 -- Integration-Level Evaluation
 
43
  | File | Description |
44
  |------|-------------|
45
  | `tier2_e2e_results.json` | End-to-end pipeline measurements for cloud_premium (whisper-large-v3 + llama3.1:8b) and edge_fast (whisper-tiny + gemma2:2b) configurations on 200 LibriSpeech samples. Includes per-stage latency breakdowns, sample ASR outputs, and sample LLM responses. |
46
  | `tier2_cross_dataset_results.json` | Cross-dataset ASR evaluation on LibriSpeech and FLEURS for whisper-large-v3 and whisper-tiny models (200 samples each). Reports WER and latency statistics. |
47
  | `tier2_noise_robustness_results.json` | ASR robustness under white noise at SNR levels 5--30 dB, plus clean baseline. Reports WER degradation across noise conditions. |
 
48
  ### Tier 3 -- Scale Evaluation
 
49
  | File | Description |
50
  |------|-------------|
51
  | `tier3_50k_summary.json` | Summary statistics for the full 50,000-turn PAVO-Bench dataset: 40K train / 10K test split, complexity distribution (levels 1--5), generation time, and error rate. |
52
  | `tier3_scaling_results.json` | LLM scaling benchmarks across multiple models (gemma2:2b, llama3.1:8b, etc.) with simple, medium, and complex query types. Reports latency, throughput, and real-time suitability. |
 
53
  ### Component Analysis
 
54
  | File | Description |
55
  |------|-------------|
56
  | `component_ablation_results.json` | Ablation study comparing PAVO-Full, PAVO-NoCoupling, and other ablated configurations. Reports latency, quality, cost, energy, coupling violations, and infeasible percentages. |
57
  | `supervised_baseline_results.json` | Supervised vs. RL routing comparison on 100K synthetic state vectors with oracle routing labels. Reports accuracy, top-3 accuracy, cost gap vs. oracle, decision latency, and training time for Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, MLP (cross-entropy), and MLP (PPO). |
 
58
  ## Usage
 
59
  ### Load individual JSON files directly
 
60
  ```python
61
  import json
62
  from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
 
63
  # Download a specific results file
64
  path = hf_hub_download(
65
  repo_id="vnmoorthy/pavo-bench",
66
  filename="tier3_50k_summary.json",
67
  repo_type="dataset",
68
  )
 
69
  with open(path) as f:
70
  data = json.load(f)
 
71
  print(f"Total samples: {data['total_samples']}")
72
+ print(f"Train/Test split: {data['train_samples']}/{data['test_samples']}")
73
+ ```
74
+ ### Download all files
75
+ ```python
76
+ from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
77
+ snapshot_download(
78
+ repo_id="vnmoorthy/pavo-bench",
79
+ repo_type="dataset",
80
+ local_dir="./pavo-bench-data",
81
+ )
82
+ ```
83
+ ## Benchmark Metrics
84
+ - **Latency** (ms): End-to-end and per-component response time
85
+ - **Quality** (0--1): Composite score incorporating ASR accuracy and LLM response quality
86
+ - **Cost** (USD): Per-turn inference cost
87
+ - **Energy** (mJ): Per-turn energy consumption
88
+ - **Coupling violations**: Cases where ASR errors propagate and degrade LLM quality
89
+ ## Citation
90
+ If you use PAVO-Bench in your research, please cite:
91
+ ```bibtex
92
+ @misc{pavo-bench-2026,
93
+ author = {VeiluKanthaPerumal, NarasingaMoorthy and Imthathullah, Mohammed},
94
+ title = {PAVO-Bench: A 50K-Turn Benchmark for ASR-LLM-TTS Pipeline Routing},
95
+ year = {2026},
96
+ institution = {University of Pennsylvania},
97
+ url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/vnmoorthy/pavo-bench}
98
+ }
99
+ ```
100
+ ## License
101
+ This dataset is released under the [Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) license. The accompanying code on GitHub is released separately under the MIT License.