text
stringlengths
7
369
[1416.02 --> 1418.56] if they made a version
[1418.56 --> 1419.28] that fit
[1419.28 --> 1421.82] four 3.5-inch hard drives,
[1422.30 --> 1423.60] this would pretty much be
[1423.60 --> 1425.62] the perfect
[1425.62 --> 1426.76] low-power
[1426.76 --> 1427.90] energy prices
[1427.90 --> 1428.36] are going through
[1428.36 --> 1429.22] the roof home now,
[1429.30 --> 1429.60] wouldn't it?
[1430.28 --> 1430.78] Yeah,
[1430.82 --> 1432.02] the only downside is,
[1432.26 --> 1434.48] and I do appreciate
[1434.48 --> 1435.30] the build
[1435.30 --> 1436.76] of materials here
[1436.76 --> 1437.98] is more expensive
[1437.98 --> 1439.06] than your average bear,
[1439.76 --> 1440.06] but
[1440.06 --> 1441.56] the dang thing's like
[1441.56 --> 1442.90] on the low end,
[1443.56 --> 1444.44] $730
[1444.44 --> 1446.06] without the Raspberry Pi.
[1446.26 --> 1447.30] That's the only gotcha,
[1447.30 --> 1447.56] right,
[1447.62 --> 1448.64] is you take something
[1448.64 --> 1449.56] that is such a beautiful
[1449.56 --> 1450.46] budget machine
[1450.46 --> 1452.68] and after you add Pi
[1452.68 --> 1453.44] and drives,
[1453.54 --> 1454.06] you're like sitting
[1454.06 --> 1454.70] at $1,500
[1454.70 --> 1455.66] all in.
[1456.38 --> 1456.64] Okay,
[1456.96 --> 1458.88] that's a bit
[1458.88 --> 1459.30] of an
[1459.30 --> 1462.04] unclearable obstacle.
[1462.48 --> 1462.80] Jesus,
[1462.80 --> 1464.04] $730,
[1464.36 --> 1465.00] I didn't see that.
[1465.38 --> 1466.00] Then again,
[1466.14 --> 1467.28] if you're shopping
[1467.28 --> 1468.20] for low power,
[1469.08 --> 1469.28] you know,
[1469.32 --> 1469.88] if you put
[1469.88 --> 1470.82] solid states
[1470.82 --> 1471.62] in this thing,
[1472.62 --> 1473.48] it would be
[1473.48 --> 1474.80] a pretty low-power NAS,
[1474.94 --> 1475.98] and so that initial
[1475.98 --> 1476.92] upfront cost
[1476.92 --> 1477.66] these days
[1477.66 --> 1479.84] may be justifiable
[1479.84 --> 1480.12] if,
[1480.58 --> 1480.74] you know,
[1480.76 --> 1481.80] over a five-year period
[1481.80 --> 1482.68] the power draws
[1482.68 --> 1484.74] 80% less
[1484.74 --> 1485.70] than an equivalent
[1485.70 --> 1486.36] PC NAS.
[1486.48 --> 1486.90] Maybe,
[1487.08 --> 1488.00] but you have to keep it
[1488.00 --> 1488.66] for five years.
[1488.72 --> 1489.48] You can't get bored
[1489.48 --> 1490.02] after two
[1490.02 --> 1490.56] and then buy
[1490.56 --> 1491.24] something else.
[1493.46 --> 1493.86] Yeah,
[1493.94 --> 1494.12] you know,
[1494.16 --> 1494.88] the Pi 5 is just
[1494.88 --> 1495.62] around the corner too
[1495.62 --> 1496.02] and you're probably
[1496.02 --> 1496.32] going to have to
[1496.32 --> 1496.96] throw out the whole
[1496.96 --> 1497.96] bottom end of this thing.
[1498.38 --> 1498.78] Exactly.
[1499.52 --> 1500.34] This is actually
[1500.34 --> 1501.20] what the compute module
[1501.20 --> 1502.08] is perfect for.
[1502.50 --> 1503.30] And I think
[1503.30 --> 1505.42] the compute module
[1505.42 --> 1506.28] for me,
[1506.40 --> 1507.36] the Raspberry Pi 4
[1507.36 --> 1508.14] compute module,
[1508.38 --> 1508.76] the CM,
[1508.94 --> 1509.56] as they call it,
[1509.94 --> 1510.82] takes it to the
[1510.82 --> 1511.88] whole next level,
[1512.06 --> 1512.30] right?
[1512.38 --> 1513.36] Because you get
[1513.36 --> 1514.70] much more connectivity
[1514.70 --> 1516.06] with these carrier boards.
[1516.34 --> 1517.82] You get PCI slots
[1517.82 --> 1518.38] potentially,
[1518.66 --> 1518.96] you can get
[1518.96 --> 1519.50] SATA ports
[1519.50 --> 1520.10] potentially.
[1521.72 --> 1522.62] This one that I've
[1522.62 --> 1523.16] been experimenting
[1523.16 --> 1523.56] with,
[1523.60 --> 1524.26] it has dual