model card: what this is, and what it deliberately does not contain
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: other
|
| 3 |
+
tags:
|
| 4 |
+
- research-artifacts
|
| 5 |
+
- sampling
|
| 6 |
+
- boltzmann
|
| 7 |
+
library_name: pytorch
|
| 8 |
+
---
|
| 9 |
+
|
| 10 |
+
# drift-sampler artifacts
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
Recorded training checkpoints for an ongoing research project on **one-step
|
| 13 |
+
samplers for unnormalized Boltzmann targets** `p(x) ∝ exp(-E(x))`.
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
**68 files, 3.2 GB.** This repository is a storage backend, not a released
|
| 16 |
+
model. On its own it does very little: the weights are only meaningful together
|
| 17 |
+
with the training/inference code, which is not public.
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
## What this is
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
Checkpoints from three eras of the project, laid out exactly as the code repo
|
| 22 |
+
expects them:
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
| prefix | count | what |
|
| 25 |
+
|---|---|---|
|
| 26 |
+
| `checkpoints/blessed/` | 34 | 2026-06, RTX 5090 workstation |
|
| 27 |
+
| `checkpoints/hpc_2026-07/` | 30 | 2026-07-29 → 08-01, NUS Hopper H200 benchmark suite |
|
| 28 |
+
| `checkpoints/aldp/` | 4 | 2026-07-31 alanine-dipeptide pipeline run-through |
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
They are kept because they are **not reproducible**: the trainer never set
|
| 31 |
+
`deterministic=True`, and these runs degrade late, so the best weights exist
|
| 32 |
+
only in an intermediate checkpoint that re-running does not recover.
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
## What this is NOT
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
- **No code.** No model definition, no drift kernel, no training loop.
|
| 37 |
+
- **No method configuration.** The checkpoints carry no `hyper_parameters`
|
| 38 |
+
block — none of the kernel scales, drift coefficients, or objective weights
|
| 39 |
+
that define the method are present. Only tensors, optimizer state, and
|
| 40 |
+
PyTorch-Lightning bookkeeping.
|
| 41 |
+
- **No datasets.** These are target-density benchmarks; there is no training
|
| 42 |
+
data. The energy function is the only access to the target.
|
| 43 |
+
- **No paper.** The method is unpublished.
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
Consequently a `state_dict` here tells you tensor shapes and little else.
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
## Usage
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
Fetched by the (private) code repository's own tooling, which verifies every
|
| 50 |
+
file against a sha256 index:
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
```bash
|
| 53 |
+
python scripts/artifacts.py pull
|
| 54 |
+
python scripts/artifacts.py verify
|
| 55 |
+
```
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
Direct download works too, but the paths are only meaningful inside that repo.
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
## Provenance and contact
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
Produced on the NUS Hopper cluster (PBS, H200) and an RTX 5090 workstation.
|
| 62 |
+
Per-file provenance — which run produced which weight, and which reported
|
| 63 |
+
number it corresponds to — lives in the code repository, not here.
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
This is research work in progress. If you want to use or cite any of it, please
|
| 66 |
+
get in touch first.
|