PEFT
Safetensors
text-to-sql
lora
sft
reasoning
keshavsharma commited on
Commit
81e59d3
Β·
verified Β·
1 Parent(s): 026dd29

Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +132 -156
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,199 +1,175 @@
1
  ---
2
- library_name: transformers
3
- tags: []
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4
  ---
5
 
6
- # Model Card for Model ID
7
-
8
- <!-- Provide a quick summary of what the model is/does. -->
9
 
 
10
 
 
11
 
12
  ## Model Details
13
 
14
- ### Model Description
15
-
16
- <!-- Provide a longer summary of what this model is. -->
17
-
18
- This is the model card of a πŸ€— transformers model that has been pushed on the Hub. This model card has been automatically generated.
19
-
20
- - **Developed by:** [More Information Needed]
21
- - **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
22
- - **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
23
- - **Model type:** [More Information Needed]
24
- - **Language(s) (NLP):** [More Information Needed]
25
- - **License:** [More Information Needed]
26
- - **Finetuned from model [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
27
-
28
- ### Model Sources [optional]
29
-
30
- <!-- Provide the basic links for the model. -->
31
-
32
- - **Repository:** [More Information Needed]
33
- - **Paper [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
34
- - **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
35
-
36
- ## Uses
37
-
38
- <!-- Address questions around how the model is intended to be used, including the foreseeable users of the model and those affected by the model. -->
39
-
40
- ### Direct Use
41
-
42
- <!-- This section is for the model use without fine-tuning or plugging into a larger ecosystem/app. -->
43
-
44
- [More Information Needed]
45
-
46
- ### Downstream Use [optional]
47
-
48
- <!-- This section is for the model use when fine-tuned for a task, or when plugged into a larger ecosystem/app -->
49
-
50
- [More Information Needed]
51
-
52
- ### Out-of-Scope Use
53
-
54
- <!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the model will not work well for. -->
55
-
56
- [More Information Needed]
57
-
58
- ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
59
-
60
- <!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
61
-
62
- [More Information Needed]
63
-
64
- ### Recommendations
65
-
66
- <!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
67
-
68
- Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations.
69
-
70
- ## How to Get Started with the Model
71
-
72
- Use the code below to get started with the model.
73
-
74
- [More Information Needed]
75
-
76
- ## Training Details
77
-
78
- ### Training Data
79
-
80
- <!-- This should link to a Dataset Card, perhaps with a short stub of information on what the training data is all about as well as documentation related to data pre-processing or additional filtering. -->
81
-
82
- [More Information Needed]
83
-
84
- ### Training Procedure
85
-
86
- <!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
87
-
88
- #### Preprocessing [optional]
89
-
90
- [More Information Needed]
91
-
92
-
93
- #### Training Hyperparameters
94
-
95
- - **Training regime:** [More Information Needed] <!--fp32, fp16 mixed precision, bf16 mixed precision, bf16 non-mixed precision, fp16 non-mixed precision, fp8 mixed precision -->
96
-
97
- #### Speeds, Sizes, Times [optional]
98
-
99
- <!-- This section provides information about throughput, start/end time, checkpoint size if relevant, etc. -->
100
-
101
- [More Information Needed]
102
-
103
- ## Evaluation
104
-
105
- <!-- This section describes the evaluation protocols and provides the results. -->
106
-
107
- ### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
108
-
109
- #### Testing Data
110
-
111
- <!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
112
-
113
- [More Information Needed]
114
-
115
- #### Factors
116
-
117
- <!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
118
-
119
- [More Information Needed]
120
-
121
- #### Metrics
122
-
123
- <!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
124
-
125
- [More Information Needed]
126
-
127
- ### Results
128
 
129
- [More Information Needed]
130
 
131
- #### Summary
 
 
132
 
 
133
 
 
 
 
134
 
135
- ## Model Examination [optional]
 
 
136
 
137
- <!-- Relevant interpretability work for the model goes here -->
138
 
139
- [More Information Needed]
140
 
141
- ## Environmental Impact
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
142
 
143
- <!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
144
 
145
- Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
 
 
 
146
 
147
- - **Hardware Type:** [More Information Needed]
148
- - **Hours used:** [More Information Needed]
149
- - **Cloud Provider:** [More Information Needed]
150
- - **Compute Region:** [More Information Needed]
151
- - **Carbon Emitted:** [More Information Needed]
152
 
153
- ## Technical Specifications [optional]
154
 
155
- ### Model Architecture and Objective
156
 
157
- [More Information Needed]
158
 
159
- ### Compute Infrastructure
160
 
161
- [More Information Needed]
162
 
163
- #### Hardware
 
 
164
 
165
- [More Information Needed]
166
 
167
- #### Software
 
168
 
169
- [More Information Needed]
170
 
171
- ## Citation [optional]
 
172
 
173
- <!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the model, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
174
 
175
- **BibTeX:**
 
 
176
 
177
- [More Information Needed]
178
 
179
- **APA:**
 
 
 
 
180
 
181
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
 
182
 
183
- ## Glossary [optional]
 
 
 
 
 
184
 
185
- <!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the model or model card. -->
 
 
 
 
 
186
 
187
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
188
 
189
- ## More Information [optional]
 
 
 
190
 
191
- [More Information Needed]
192
 
193
- ## Model Card Authors [optional]
194
 
195
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
196
 
197
- ## Model Card Contact
198
 
199
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
1
  ---
2
+ license: apache-2.0
3
+ base_model: TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0
4
+ library_name: peft
5
+ tags:
6
+ - text-to-sql
7
+ - lora
8
+ - peft
9
+ - sft
10
+ - reasoning
11
+ datasets:
12
+ - gretelai/synthetic_text_to_sql
13
  ---
14
 
15
+ # TinyLlama-1.1B Text-to-SQL β€” LoRA SFT with Reasoning
 
 
16
 
17
+ A parameter-efficient fine-tuned adapter for `TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0` that converts natural-language questions and SQL database schemas into SQL queries, trained to produce an explicit reasoning trace before the final answer.
18
 
19
+ This is a second-generation adapter in the same series as [keshavsharma/qwen2.5-3b-sql-lora-sft](https://huggingface.co/keshavsharma/qwen2.5-3b-sql-lora-sft) and an earlier plain-SQL TinyLlama adapter. Two changes from the earlier TinyLlama attempt drove a large jump in output quality: switching the training set from `b-mc2/sql-create-context` to `gretelai/synthetic_text_to_sql` (broader task-type and complexity coverage, including joins and analytics-style questions), and training the model to reason step-by-step inside `<reasoning>` tags before committing to a final `<answer>`.
20
 
21
  ## Model Details
22
 
23
+ | Property | Value |
24
+ |---|---|
25
+ | Base model | TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0 |
26
+ | Fine-tuning method | LoRA / PEFT |
27
+ | Task | Text-to-SQL, with reasoning trace |
28
+ | Dataset | gretelai/synthetic_text_to_sql |
29
+ | LoRA rank | 32 |
30
+ | LoRA alpha | 64 |
31
+ | LoRA dropout | 0.1 |
32
+ | Target modules | q_proj, k_proj, v_proj, o_proj, gate_proj, up_proj, down_proj |
33
+ | Maximum sequence length | 768 tokens |
34
+ | Training epochs | 2 |
35
+ | Learning rate | 2e-4 |
36
+ | LR scheduler | Cosine |
37
+ | Warmup ratio | 0.03 |
38
+ | Weight decay | 0.01 |
39
+ | Precision | BF16 |
40
+ | Optimizer | AdamW fused |
41
+ | Train/eval split | 90% / 10% |
42
+ | Split seed | 42 |
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
43
 
44
+ ## Intended Use
45
 
46
+ The model takes:
47
+ - A database schema, as CREATE TABLE statements (`SQL Context`).
48
+ - A natural-language question about the database.
49
 
50
+ It generates a short reasoning trace identifying the relevant tables/columns and query shape, followed by the final SQL query.
51
 
52
+ ## Output Format
53
+
54
+ Unlike a plain text-to-SQL model, this adapter is trained to always respond with a reasoning block followed by an answer block:
55
 
56
+ ```
57
+ <reasoning>...step-by-step derivation of the query...</reasoning><answer>...final SQL query...</answer>
58
+ ```
59
 
60
+ **Downstream code must parse the `<answer>...</answer>` span out of the generation before treating it as executable SQL** β€” do not execute the raw model output directly.
61
 
62
+ ## Example
63
 
64
+ Schema:
65
+ ```sql
66
+ CREATE TABLE employees (
67
+ employee_id INTEGER,
68
+ name TEXT,
69
+ salary REAL,
70
+ department TEXT
71
+ );
72
+ ```
73
 
74
+ Question: `What is the average salary of employees in the engineering department?`
75
 
76
+ Generated output:
77
+ ```
78
+ <reasoning>This query calculates the average salary of employees in the engineering department by using the AVG function on the salary column, and filtering the employees table for rows where the department is 'Engineering'.</reasoning><answer>SELECT AVG(salary) FROM employees WHERE department = 'Engineering';</answer>
79
+ ```
80
 
81
+ ## Training Method
 
 
 
 
82
 
83
+ Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with LoRA. Instead of updating all parameters of the base model, LoRA adds trainable low-rank matrices to selected transformer layers while keeping the original weights frozen.
84
 
85
+ ### Loss Masking
86
 
87
+ Loss is computed only on the reasoning + answer tokens (`<reasoning>...</reasoning><answer>...</answer>`). System prompt, schema, and question tokens are masked with `-100` in the labels, so the model is trained to produce the reasoning-and-answer continuation rather than being penalized for reproducing the input prompt.
88
 
89
+ ### Prompt Format
90
 
91
+ Uses TinyLlama's chat template. The system instruction used during training:
92
 
93
+ ```
94
+ You are a text-to-SQL assistant. Given a database schema (CREATE TABLE statements) and a question, write the SQL query that answers the question. Respond with only the SQL query. Reason with <reasoning></reasoning> blocks. Answer with <answer></answer> blocks.
95
+ ```
96
 
97
+ The user turn follows the format:
98
 
99
+ ```
100
+ SQL Context: {schema}
101
 
102
+ Question: {question}
103
 
104
+ Write the SQL query that answers the question.
105
+ ```
106
 
107
+ ## Installation
108
 
109
+ ```bash
110
+ pip install torch transformers datasets accelerate peft
111
+ ```
112
 
113
+ ## Inference
114
 
115
+ ```python
116
+ import re
117
+ import torch
118
+ from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
119
+ from peft import PeftModel
120
 
121
+ BASE_MODEL = "TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0"
122
+ ADAPTER = "keshavsharma/tinyllama-1.1b-sql-reasoning"
123
+
124
+ tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(BASE_MODEL)
125
+ if tokenizer.pad_token is None:
126
+ tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token
127
 
128
+ base_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
129
+ BASE_MODEL, torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16, device_map="auto"
130
+ )
131
+ model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(base_model, ADAPTER)
132
+ model.eval()
133
+ model.config.use_cache = True
134
 
135
+ SYSTEM_PROMPT = (
136
+ "You are a text-to-SQL assistant. Given a database schema (CREATE TABLE "
137
+ "statements) and a question, write the SQL query that answers the question. "
138
+ "Respond with only the SQL query. Reason with <reasoning></reasoning> blocks. "
139
+ "Answer with <answer></answer> blocks."
140
+ )
141
 
142
+ def generate_sql(schema, question):
143
+ messages = [
144
+ {"role": "system", "content": SYSTEM_PROMPT},
145
+ {"role": "user", "content": f"SQL Context: {schema}\n\nQuestion: {question}\n\nWrite the SQL query that answers the question."},
146
+ ]
147
+ prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
148
+ inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
149
+ with torch.no_grad():
150
+ outputs = model.generate(
151
+ **inputs, max_new_tokens=768, do_sample=False, pad_token_id=tokenizer.eos_token_id
152
+ )
153
+ raw = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True).strip()
154
 
155
+ match = re.search(r"<answer>(.*?)</answer>", raw, re.DOTALL)
156
+ sql = match.group(1).strip() if match else None
157
+ return {"raw": raw, "sql": sql}
158
+ ```
159
 
160
+ Note the reference implementation used during training generated with `do_sample=False` for evaluation, but the training-time sanity-check cell in this repo's notebook used sampling (`top_p=0.95`, `temperature=0.9`) with `do_sample=False` set simultaneously β€” those sampling parameters are ignored when `do_sample=False`, so generation was effectively greedy/deterministic throughout. Keep `do_sample=False` for reproducible evaluation; only enable sampling deliberately if you want varied reasoning traces.
161
 
162
+ ## Limitations
163
 
164
+ - Generated SQL should be validated β€” and ideally checked that every referenced table/column actually exists in the given schema β€” before execution. Spot testing showed occasional hallucinated column names on harder correlated-subquery questions (e.g. inventing a column that doesn't appear in the schema).
165
+ - Correlated aggregate arithmetic inside `HAVING` (e.g. comparing an average against a per-row-derived threshold computed from another aggregate) remains a weak spot; treat multi-step nested-aggregate questions with extra caution.
166
+ - As a 1.1B-parameter base model, this adapter has materially less headroom than larger Text-to-SQL fine-tunes (e.g. the Qwen2.5-3B version in the same series) on harder multi-table, multi-condition questions, even with reasoning traces.
167
+ - The reasoning trace reflects the model's stated derivation, not a verified execution trace β€” it can be fluent and plausible while the final SQL is still wrong. Don't treat the presence of correct-sounding reasoning as confirmation the SQL is correct.
168
+ - No claim of production-level Text-to-SQL reliability is made. Outputs should be reviewed or executed against a real schema before use in any automated pipeline.
169
 
170
+ ## Citation / References
171
 
172
+ - TinyLlama β€” [TinyLlama: An Open-Source Small Language Model](https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.02385)
173
+ - LoRA β€” Hu et al., *LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models*
174
+ - PEFT β€” Hugging Face Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning
175
+ - Synthetic Text-to-SQL dataset β€” gretelai/synthetic_text_to_sql