ltuncay commited on
Commit
58910d4
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): e20d946

Document 2M X-ARES and HEAR results and link the BEST-RQ-2 paper

Browse files
Files changed (2) hide show
  1. README.md +45 -10
  2. export_manifest.json +1 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -9,10 +9,13 @@ tags:
9
  - audio-embeddings
10
  - best-rq-2
11
  - audioset
 
12
  ---
13
  # BEST-RQ-ViT
14
 
15
- > **Recommended: [BEST-RQ-2.2-base](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.2-base)** has the strongest reported X-ARES results in this comparison.
 
 
16
 
17
  BEST-RQ-ViT is a self-supervised audio encoder trained on AudioSet for
18
  **200,000 optimizer steps**. It produces **768-dimensional** clip and frame
@@ -29,29 +32,61 @@ repository is needed.
29
  ## X-ARES results
30
 
31
  Scores on [X-ARES](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16369) (0–100, higher is better).
32
- Audio-JEPA, BEST-RQ (Conformer), BEST-RQ (ViT),
33
- and all BEST-RQ-2 variants reported below are trained on the **same AudioSet
34
- split for 200,000 steps**. The pretrained baselines are shown for comparison.
 
35
 
36
  | Model | Speech | Music | Environment | Global Mean | Mean of Means | Hugging Face model |
37
  | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- |
38
- | data2vec | 50.62 | 23.24 | 15.41 | 37.83 | 29.76 | [facebook/data2vec-audio-base](https://huggingface.co/facebook/data2vec-audio-base) |
39
- | wav2vec 2.0 | 41.79 | 34.94 | 29.52 | 37.84 | 35.42 | [facebook/wav2vec2-large-100k-voxpopuli](https://huggingface.co/facebook/wav2vec2-large-100k-voxpopuli) |
40
- | Whisper | 49.19 | 38.67 | 28.61 | 42.75 | 38.82 | [openai/whisper-base](https://huggingface.co/openai/whisper-base) |
41
  | Audio-JEPA | 29.64 | 44.27 | 25.61 | 31.18 | 33.17 | [Audio-JEPA-base](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/Audio-JEPA-base) |
42
- | BEST-RQ (Conformer) | 40.43 | 35.58 | 30.81 | 37.43 | 35.60 | Separate codebase |
43
  | BEST-RQ (ViT) | 32.87 | 41.62 | 34.50 | 34.88 | 36.33 | [BEST-RQ-ViT](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-ViT) |
44
  | BEST-RQ-2 (Interspeech 2026) | 38.49 | 54.40 | 46.39 | 43.21 | 46.43 | [BEST-RQ-2](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2) |
45
  | BEST-RQ-2.1 | 52.60 | 62.23 | 53.38 | 54.59 | 56.07 | [BEST-RQ-2.1-base](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.1-base) |
46
- | BEST-RQ-2.2 | **53.78** | **63.90** | **55.71** | **56.11** | **57.80** | [BEST-RQ-2.2-base](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.2-base) |
 
 
47
 
48
  Global Mean averages all benchmark task scores. Mean of Means gives equal
49
  weight to the Speech, Music, and Environment category means.
50
 
51
- Audio-JEPA scores were supplied by the author for [run `jp6l70l6`](https://wandb.ai/tuncay-ludovic/audio%20embeddings/runs/jp6l70l6). The remaining scores are reported in the [project README](https://github.com/LudovicTuncay/audio-embeddings/blob/bb88bf790b1dcf8251c6b38e7a4766534adf33d3/README.md). These are reported research results, not a new benchmark run of the Transformers exports.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
52
 
53
  The Audio-JEPA row refers to the newer **16 kHz, 200,000-step** run, not the original ICME model (**32 kHz, 100,000 steps**). The author reports better results for this newer checkpoint.
54
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
55
  ## Model and training
56
 
57
  | Property | Value |
 
9
  - audio-embeddings
10
  - best-rq-2
11
  - audioset
12
+ - arxiv:2606.30700
13
  ---
14
  # BEST-RQ-ViT
15
 
16
+ [![BEST-RQ-2 paper: arXiv 2606.30700](https://img.shields.io/badge/arXiv-2606.30700-b31b1b.svg)](https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30700)
17
+
18
+ > **Recommended: [BEST-RQ-2.2-base-2M](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.2-base-2M)** has the highest reported overall X-ARES scores in this comparison (2M training steps, `overlap50` evaluation).
19
 
20
  BEST-RQ-ViT is a self-supervised audio encoder trained on AudioSet for
21
  **200,000 optimizer steps**. It produces **768-dimensional** clip and frame
 
32
  ## X-ARES results
33
 
34
  Scores on [X-ARES](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16369) (0–100, higher is better).
35
+ Audio-JEPA, BEST-RQ (Conformer), BEST-RQ (ViT), and the original BEST-RQ-2
36
+ variants below use the **same AudioSet split for 200,000 steps**.
37
+ **BEST-RQ-2.2 (2M)** uses **2,000,000 steps**, with batch size 128 per GPU
38
+ on two GPUs (effective batch 256). The pretrained baselines are shown for comparison.
39
 
40
  | Model | Speech | Music | Environment | Global Mean | Mean of Means | Hugging Face model |
41
  | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- |
42
+ | data2vec | 50.62 | 23.24 | 15.41 | 37.83 | 29.76 | [data2vec-audio-base](https://huggingface.co/facebook/data2vec-audio-base) |
43
+ | wav2vec 2.0 | 41.79 | 34.94 | 29.52 | 37.84 | 35.42 | [wav2vec2-large-100k-voxpopuli](https://huggingface.co/facebook/wav2vec2-large-100k-voxpopuli) |
44
+ | Whisper | 49.19 | 38.67 | 28.61 | 42.75 | 38.82 | [whisper-base](https://huggingface.co/openai/whisper-base) |
45
  | Audio-JEPA | 29.64 | 44.27 | 25.61 | 31.18 | 33.17 | [Audio-JEPA-base](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/Audio-JEPA-base) |
46
+ | BEST-RQ (Conformer) | 40.43 | 35.58 | 30.81 | 37.43 | 35.60 | Separate codebase (recipe unavailable) |
47
  | BEST-RQ (ViT) | 32.87 | 41.62 | 34.50 | 34.88 | 36.33 | [BEST-RQ-ViT](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-ViT) |
48
  | BEST-RQ-2 (Interspeech 2026) | 38.49 | 54.40 | 46.39 | 43.21 | 46.43 | [BEST-RQ-2](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2) |
49
  | BEST-RQ-2.1 | 52.60 | 62.23 | 53.38 | 54.59 | 56.07 | [BEST-RQ-2.1-base](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.1-base) |
50
+ | BEST-RQ-2.2 | 53.78 | 63.90 | 55.71 | 56.11 | 57.80 | [BEST-RQ-2.2-base](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.2-base) |
51
+ | BEST-RQ-2.2 (2M) | 58.62 | 65.74 | 61.80 | 58.77 | 62.05 | [BEST-RQ-2.2-base-2M](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.2-base-2M) |
52
+ | BEST-RQ-2.2 (2M, overlap50) | **60.87** | **65.78** | **65.90** | **61.13** | **64.18** | [BEST-RQ-2.2-base-2M](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.2-base-2M) |
53
 
54
  Global Mean averages all benchmark task scores. Mean of Means gives equal
55
  weight to the Speech, Music, and Environment category means.
56
 
57
+ The two 2M rows report the same training checkpoint with different extraction
58
+ settings: [original evaluation](https://wandb.ai/tuncay-ludovic/X-ARES/runs/cw0rrt7o)
59
+ and [50% overlapping windows](https://wandb.ai/tuncay-ludovic/X-ARES/runs/a7a3fy9z).
60
+ Their scores use the logged **Combined** metric: equal weight for the linear-probe
61
+ and k-NN aggregates, excluding unavailable tasks separately for each method.
62
+ The earlier rows retain previously reported scores. Extraction and evaluation
63
+ settings differ across runs, so this is not a controlled training-duration ablation.
64
+
65
+ Audio-JEPA scores were supplied by the author for [run `jp6l70l6`](https://wandb.ai/tuncay-ludovic/audio%20embeddings/runs/jp6l70l6). The other 200k-model and pretrained-baseline scores are reported in the [project README](https://github.com/LudovicTuncay/audio-embeddings/blob/bb88bf790b1dcf8251c6b38e7a4766534adf33d3/README.md). These are reported research results, not a new benchmark run of the Transformers exports.
66
 
67
  The Audio-JEPA row refers to the newer **16 kHz, 200,000-step** run, not the original ICME model (**32 kHz, 100,000 steps**). The author reports better results for this newer checkpoint.
68
 
69
+ ## HEAR results
70
+
71
+ Scores on [HEAR](https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.03022) (0–100, higher is better),
72
+ using `overlap50_two_phase` extraction. All five project models cover all 19 tasks.
73
+ BEST-RQ-2.2 (2M) was trained for 2,000,000 steps; the other rows use 200,000 steps.
74
+
75
+ | Model | Speech | Music | Environment | Global Mean | Mean of Means | Coverage |
76
+ | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- |
77
+ | Audio-JEPA | 36.53 | 74.20 | 51.85 | 56.42 | 54.19 | 19/19 |
78
+ | BEST-RQ-2 | 50.74 | 79.46 | 69.21 | 67.69 | 66.47 | 19/19 |
79
+ | BEST-RQ-2.1 | 64.74 | 86.47 | 70.83 | 75.50 | 74.02 | 19/19 |
80
+ | BEST-RQ-2.2 | 65.76 | 85.13 | 76.19 | 76.66 | 75.69 | 19/19 |
81
+ | BEST-RQ-2.2 (2M) | 70.18 | 85.38 | 81.82 | 79.64 | 79.13 | 19/19 |
82
+
83
+ The 2M scores come from [this W&B evaluation](https://wandb.ai/tuncay-ludovic/HEAR/runs/hear-v2-aa56c55deb6099f6); its checkpoint hash
84
+ matches the released 2M checkpoint. The earlier rows retain the reported
85
+ 2026-09-19 W&B comparison. [Score sources and task-level 2M results](https://github.com/LudovicTuncay/audio-embeddings/blob/master/docs/data/best_rq_2_2_2m_results.json).
86
+ These are arithmetic means of primary task scores, with equal task weighting for
87
+ Global Mean and equal domain weighting for Mean of Means; they are not the
88
+ challenge's standardized ranking. These evaluations precede the Transformers export.
89
+
90
  ## Model and training
91
 
92
  | Property | Value |
export_manifest.json CHANGED
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
29
  },
30
  "files": {
31
  "CODE_LICENSE": "8fe9e8b749cd4abedabcb3100df445db899e72192394d14cc2dbf24a40811af6",
32
- "README.md": "662fd0b97f7dff054d662b4a0ff9b117b87c8a411275d4b715a4c19fdbd389a7",
33
  "adapters.py": "ca0f26826763c0e48b7508da732242bb83adfeb4814e389ed3fde93ad648c728",
34
  "config.json": "fe8227548617416bd879efe1be3e9e3fc04270709250f09f01806780fe548789",
35
  "configuration_audio.py": "59f3a0b8db0df5af85e677ac33a4431595e9b2eff6d34c1e6a1778dd75a4568d",
 
29
  },
30
  "files": {
31
  "CODE_LICENSE": "8fe9e8b749cd4abedabcb3100df445db899e72192394d14cc2dbf24a40811af6",
32
+ "README.md": "2493c16efc81e7e72381349fdb3a9dd46b99b49fee3a279b3b47c638c5246f3d",
33
  "adapters.py": "ca0f26826763c0e48b7508da732242bb83adfeb4814e389ed3fde93ad648c728",
34
  "config.json": "fe8227548617416bd879efe1be3e9e3fc04270709250f09f01806780fe548789",
35
  "configuration_audio.py": "59f3a0b8db0df5af85e677ac33a4431595e9b2eff6d34c1e6a1778dd75a4568d",