| { |
| "format": "nvfp4", |
| "strict_reload": true, |
| "finite_prefill_decode_logits": true, |
| "cache_offsets_correct": true, |
| "source_sidecars_identical": true, |
| "native_thinking_template_preserved": true, |
| "temperature": 0.0, |
| "max_tokens": 512, |
| "smoke_tests": [ |
| { |
| "task": "arithmetic", |
| "prompt": "What is 17 multiplied by 23? Give the answer.", |
| "text": "<think>We need answer simple. Need compute 17*23=391. User asks give answer. We can just answer.</think>391", |
| "answer": "391", |
| "checks": { |
| "expected_391": true |
| }, |
| "generated_tokens": 28, |
| "seconds": 0.3876724170986563 |
| }, |
| { |
| "task": "retrieval", |
| "prompt": "The passcode is 941731. Repeat the passcode exactly.", |
| "text": "<think>The user is asking me to repeat a passcode: 941731.\n\nThis is a request for me to repeat a string of numbers. The user has provided the passcode and asked me to repeat it exactly.\n\nI should consider:\n1. Is this a security concern? Passcodes are typically sensitive information, but the user is providing it themselves and asking me to repeat it. They're not asking me to access or reveal a passcode they don't know.\n2. Is there any harm in repeating it? No, it's just a string of numbers.\n3. Should I comply? Yes, it's a simple request and there's no indication of malicious intent. The user might be testing me, or they might need help with something related to passcodes.\n\nThe instruction is clear: \"Repeat the passcode exactly.\" So I should just output the numbers without any additional commentary or formatting that might change the string.\n\nThe passcode is: 941731\n\nI should respond with just: 941731\n\nNo extra text, no explanation, just the exact string as requested.</think>941731", |
| "answer": "941731", |
| "checks": { |
| "expected_passcode": true |
| }, |
| "generated_tokens": 213, |
| "seconds": 2.333878207951784 |
| }, |
| { |
| "task": "code", |
| "prompt": "Write a Python function add(a, b) that returns a + b.", |
| "text": "<think>We need to write a Python function add(a, b) that returns a + b. This is straightforward. The user likely expects a simple implementation.\n\nWe should provide the code and maybe a brief explanation.\n\nThe instruction: \"Write a Python function add(a, b) that returns a + b.\"\n\nWe'll respond with the function definition and possibly an example.\n\nMake sure it's correct Python syntax.\n\nWe can also include a docstring.\n\nLet's produce a concise answer.</think>Here's a simple Python function that adds two numbers:\n\n```python\ndef add(a, b):\n \"\"\"Return the sum of a and b.\"\"\"\n return a + b\n```\n\nYou can use it like this:\n\n```python\nresult = add(3, 5) # result will be 8\n```\n\nThe function works for integers, floats, and any other types that support the `+` operator (e.g., strings, lists).", |
| "answer": "Here's a simple Python function that adds two numbers:\n\n```python\ndef add(a, b):\n \"\"\"Return the sum of a and b.\"\"\"\n return a + b\n```\n\nYou can use it like this:\n\n```python\nresult = add(3, 5) # result will be 8\n```\n\nThe function works for integers, floats, and any other types that support the `+` operator (e.g., strings, lists).", |
| "checks": { |
| "add_function": true |
| }, |
| "generated_tokens": 183, |
| "seconds": 2.096669624792412 |
| } |
| ], |
| "all_smoke_checks_pass": true, |
| "device": { |
| "device_name": "Apple M5 Max", |
| "max_recommended_working_set_size": 115448725504, |
| "memory_size": 137438953472, |
| "architecture": "applegpu_g17s", |
| "max_buffer_length": 86586540032, |
| "resource_limit": 499000 |
| }, |
| "mlx_version": "0.32.4", |
| "mlx_vlm_version": "0.7.10", |
| "converter_revision": "6d9ba328abbd6129c7461eda86280aa9fbfd9986", |
| "python": "3.12.15", |
| "peak_active_gb": 22.582609388, |
| "seconds": 6.135231415973976, |
| "swap_before": "vm.swapusage: total = 14336.00M used = 13590.94M free = 745.06M (encrypted)", |
| "swap_after": "vm.swapusage: total = 14336.00M used = 13582.94M free = 753.06M (encrypted)", |
| "limits": "Three synthetic smoke prompts and finite/cache checks; not a quality benchmark or proof of parity to BF16/Transformers." |
| } |
