Papers
arxiv:2608.18093

Abliteration Mitigation via Refusal Aliases

Published on Jun 7
Authors:

Abstract

Abliteration, the removal of refusal capabilities from large language models by projecting weight matrices orthogonal to an extracted refusal direction, has emerged as a prominent safety concern through its ability to bypass post-training alignment using only a small set of contrastive prompts. We find that existing defenses commonly overlook the cause of abliteration; that is, how easily the refusal direction can be extracted. To hinder this process, we introduce a weight-editing method that obscures the refusal signal by applying rank-k updates to residual stream writer matrices while replacing refusal-inducing activations with random aliases and correcting downstream reader matrices to preserve the model's original behavior. On Llama-3-8B, AMRA improves post-abliteration refusal scores by 2.16 points over the undefended baseline with less than 0.5 percentage points of MMLU degradation. On Gemma-2-9B, it improves the post-abliteration refusal by 14.70 points over the baseline while keeping harmful output rates similar to the baseline, albeit at a greater utility cost.

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2608.18093
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 1

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.18093 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.18093 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.