SkillSpec: Intent-Masked Specification Reasoning for Agent Skill Correctness
Abstract
SkillSpec uses specification reasoning over a unified skill graph to detect semantic defects in autonomous agent skills by balancing contextual views and sandbox validation.
Autonomous agent systems increasingly depend on reusable skill abstractions for consolidating experiential knowledge and domain expertise. These artifacts typically bundle free-form instructions with heterogeneous resources. However, ensuring their correctness remains challenging. Their failure modes transcend conventional code defects to subtle semantic inconsistencies such as intent conflicts, which manifest as silent failures masked by the underlying model. Moreover, skill correctness must be grounded in intended task boundaries and generalizability. We propose SkillSpec, a Hoare-style framework that formulates skill correctness as a specification reasoning problem. It transforms a heterogeneous skill repository into a unified graph representation that aligns descriptions, instructions and code artifacts. For each node, SkillSpec derives an ExpectSpec from the surrounding declared intent, and infers FactSpecs from encoded behavior under partially disclosed intent. An intent mask regulates access to holistic, lineage, neighborhood, and local views to balance the bias introduced by excessive context against unsupported inference caused by insufficient context. SkillSpec jointly reasons over these views to flag candidate defects, and automatically validates them in an isolated sandbox. On 515 real-world skills from SkillsBench and widely downloaded repositories, SkillSpec identified 763 manually confirmed defects across 239 skills, achieving 61.2% precision. The node-level analysis across multiple model families shows that specification reasoning is consistently reliable for code nodes, whereas plain-text nodes remain a major bottleneck. Most defects arise at the boundaries between declared intent and implementation, demonstrating that explicit specifications provide a practical foundation for skill quality assurance in real-world agent ecosystems.
Community
Hi everyone! I'm one of the authors of SkillSpec.
Autonomous agent systems increasingly depend on reusable skill abstractions for consolidating experiential knowledge and domain expertise. These artifacts typically bundle free-form instructions with heterogeneous resources. However, ensuring their correctness remains challenging. Their failure modes transcend conventional code defects to subtle semantic inconsistencies such as intent conflicts, which manifest as silent failures masked by the underlying model. Moreover, skill correctness must be grounded in intended task boundaries and generalizability.
We propose SkillSpec, a Hoare-style framework that formulates skill correctness as a specification reasoning problem. It transforms a heterogeneous skill repository into a unified graph representation that aligns descriptions, instructions and code artifacts. For each node, SkillSpec derives an ExpectSpec from the surrounding declared intent, and infers FactSpecs from encoded behavior under partially disclosed intent. An intent mask regulates access to holistic, lineage, neighborhood, and local views to balance the bias introduced by excessive context against unsupported inference caused by insufficient context. SkillSpec jointly reasons over these views to flag candidate defects, and automatically validates them in an isolated sandbox.
On 515 real-world skills from SkillsBench and widely downloaded repositories, SkillSpec identified 763 manually confirmed defects across 239 skills, achieving 61.2% precision. The node-level analysis across multiple model families shows that specification reasoning is consistently reliable for code nodes, whereas plain-text nodes remain a major bottleneck. Most defects arise at the boundaries between declared intent and implementation, demonstrating that explicit specifications provide a practical foundation for skill quality assurance in real-world agent ecosystems.
Code and the defect dataset are publicly available:
- Code: https://github.com/IainZhang/SkillSpec
- Dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/IainZhang/SkillSpec
We welcome feedback and discussion from researchers and developers building reusable agent skills!
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- SkillZip: Contract-Preserving Graph Compression for Scalable Agent Skill Libraries (2026)
- Evidence-Calibrated Runtime Reconstruction for Agent Skills Across Heterogeneous Coding Agents (2026)
- FACET: Preserving Source Intent and Executable State in Terminal Task Synthesis (2026)
- SIGIL: Compiling Agent Skills into Typed Harnesses (2026)
- TRUSS: Towards Task-Reliable and User-Safe Automated Agent Skill Generation (2026)
- SkillConsist: Detecting Inconsistencies in Agent Skills via Bidirectional Graph Alignment (2026)
- What Keeps Agent Skills from Being Reusable? Evidence from 138K SKILL.md Files (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2609.06052 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 1
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper