Papers
arxiv:2609.27593

Hidden not Deleted: How Networks Suppress Entangled Features

Published on Sep 23
Authors:
,
,

Abstract

Concept erasure methods that operate via linear projection assume that features occupy separable subspaces. We show this assumption fails under dense superposition: when two features are forced into an antipodal pair sharing a single subspace, state-of-the-art linear erasure destroys both, not just the target. Networks trained with gradient descent instead solve this problem non-linearly, but not uniformly: they converge to one of two distinct circuit-level solutions depending on initialization, which we call mirror and shadow solutions. We map this bifurcation as a function of feature entanglement, show it reflects a stable attractor structure rather than an artifact of our setup, and use targeted causal interventions to demonstrate that both solutions leave a substantial, measurable trace of the erased feature's representation intact, recoverable through a single scalar patch rather than requiring any further training. This mirrors a failure mode recently observed empirically in LLM unlearning, where suppression rather than deletion allows forgotten knowledge to resurface; our results offer a mechanistic, causally-validated account of why that failure mode occurs.

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2609.27593
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.27593 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.27593 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.27593 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.