Papers
arxiv:2609.29123

Accent Analogy Guidance: More Speaker Similarity at Equal Accent in Cross-Lingual Voice Cloning

Published on Sep 24
· Submitted by
Yoomee Cho
on Oct 7
Authors:

Abstract

In cross-lingual zero-shot text-to-speech, the accent of the reference leaks into the target speech. We propose accent analogy guidance (AAG), a training-free sampler term that subtracts an accent direction estimated from the model's own predictions for one synthetic voice rendered in both languages, so the voice cancels and only the accent remains. By a blind LLM accent judge on real dubbing data, reweighting classifier-free guidance between reference and text, and its variants, stay near one identity-accent trade-off curve; we score a method by its speaker similarity above that curve at equal accent (ΔSIM). Across four open TTS models AAG lies above the curve: on OmniVoice ΔSIM is +0.11 to +0.27 on three test sets (accent 3.51 to 4.28 on a 1-5 scale at speaker similarity 0.29, where reweighting keeps 0.02); MaskGCT and CosyVoice 2 also lie above their curves, and on F5-TTS it is more native than any reweighting setting. An LLM-free language-ID measure and a twelve-listener panel agree. A premise test and the reach of a model's own curve indicate in advance whether and roughly how much AAG can gain, predicting the one model where it gains nothing (X-Voice).

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

In cross-lingual zero-shot TTS, the accent of the reference speaker leaks into the target language. Accent Analogy Guidance (AAG) is a training-free sampler term: it subtracts an accent direction estimated from the model's own predictions for one synthetic voice rendered in both languages, so the voice cancels and only the accent remains.

Reweighting classifier-free guidance between reference and text, and its variants, stay near one identity–accent trade-off curve; we score a method by its speaker similarity above that curve at equal accent (ΔSIM). Across four open TTS models AAG lies above the curve: on OmniVoice ΔSIM is +0.11 to +0.27 on three test sets (accent 3.51 to 4.28 on a 1–5 scale at speaker similarity 0.29, where reweighting keeps 0.02); MaskGCT and CosyVoice 2 also lie above their curves, and on F5-TTS it is more native than any reweighting setting. An LLM-free language-ID measure and a twelve-listener panel agree. A premise test and the reach of a model's own curve indicate in advance whether and roughly how much AAG can gain, including the one model where it gains nothing (X-Voice).

Samples: https://yoomee-cho.github.io/accent-analogy-guidance/

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2609.29123
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.29123 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.29123 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.29123 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.