Papers
arxiv:2609.38680

ReGain: Restoring Subject Fidelity in Personalization on Synthetic Images

Published on Sep 30
· Submitted by
Shubhang Bhatnagar
on Oct 8
Authors:
,
,
,

Abstract

Text-to-image diffusion models are personalized to a subject by DreamBooth fine-tuning on a handful of its images. Increasingly, these images come from a diffusion model rather than a camera. We show that fine-tuning on such synthetic images degrades subject fidelity, producing oversaturated color and excess high-frequency detail. To isolate the cause, we fine-tune two models from the same base model with the same DreamBooth recipe, one on real photos of a subject and one on synthetic images of that subject generated by the first. We trace the degradation to classifier-free guidance (CFG). For the model personalized on synthetic images, the angle between the conditional and unconditional noise predictions, and with it the norm of their difference, is much larger than for the model personalized on real photos. This inflation grows toward high frequencies and also appears at other prompts semantically close to the subject, such as its class noun, but not at unrelated ones. We propose ReGain, a training-free correction applied at sampling time that measures how much each frequency band of the guidance is inflated relative to the base model and scales that band down accordingly. ReGain needs no real photos. On Stable Diffusion v1.5, ReGain closes 51-64% of the subject-fidelity gap to the model personalized on real photos, as measured by DINO, DINOv2 and CLIP-I. It also improves subject fidelity on SDXL and SD 3.5 and preserves text alignment on all three backbones.

Community

Paper submitter

Hi everyone, first author here! Personalizing diffusion models on synthetic images can produce oversaturated colors and excessive texture. We trace this to inflated classifier-free guidance, especially at high frequencies.

ReGain corrects guidance across frequency bands and denoising steps, with no retraining or real photos needed. It recovers 51–64% of lost subject fidelity on SD1.5 while preserving text alignment, with improvements on SDXL and SD3.5 too.

Visual comparisons and analysis: https://shubhangb97.github.io/regain/

Happy to discuss the findings and hear your feedback!

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2609.38680
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.38680 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.38680 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.38680 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.