Papers
arxiv:2610.00574

Make Sparse Rewards Count: Density-Aware Reward Aggregation for Multi-Reward RL

Published on Sep 30
· Submitted by
zhaihaotian
on Oct 2
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Multi-reward reinforcement learning trains large language models to satisfy multiple behavioral objectives simultaneously. Reward-wise normalization, as used in GDPO, preserves reward-specific relative information within rollout groups, but different objectives can still exhibit uneven learning progress. We study this behavior through advantage energy, the sum of a reward's squared advantages over a batch. Under idealized GDPO normalization, we show that this energy is proportional to active-group density: the fraction of rollout groups in which the reward provides nonzero relative advantages. This reveals a residual batch-level signal imbalance and provides a basis for calibrating reward contributions. Based on this relation, we propose Density-Aware Reward Aggregation (DARA). We derive an inverse-square-root density correction that gives greater weight to signals from less frequently active rewards. DARA computes its weights from each rollout batch, adapting to changes in reward activity throughout training without modifying the underlying policy optimization objective. Experiments on tool calling and mathematical reasoning show that DARA learns the targeted behaviors faster than GDPO, reaching high format compliance in up to 26% fewer training steps on tool calling and near-saturated length compliance in up to 65% fewer steps on mathematical reasoning, while remaining competitive in final performance. Our code is available at https://github.com/zhaihaotian/DARA.

Community

Paper submitter

Why do some rewards get learned much more slowly in multi-reward RL, even with GDPO? We show the root cause is advantage energy: under GDPO, a reward's energy scales with how often it is active in a batch, so sparse rewards are drowned out. DARA fixes this with a density-based weight that, in theory, gives every reward equal energy. It is recomputed from each batch and needs no tuning. It reaches the target behavior in up to 26% fewer steps on tool calling and 65% fewer steps on math, with competitive final performance.

Code: github.com/zhaihaotian/DARA

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.00574
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.00574 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.00574 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.00574 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.