Papers
arxiv:2610.00812

Video Generation Models: A Survey of Post-Training and Alignment

Published on Sep 30
· Submitted by
Chaoyu Li
on Oct 2
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Video generation has rapidly progressed from short, low-quality clips to high-resolution, long-duration sequences with complex spatiotemporal dynamics. Despite strong generative priors learned through large-scale pretraining, pretrained video models often fail to reliably follow human intent, maintain temporal coherence, or satisfy physical and safety constraints. Compared with image and text generation, alignment in video generation presents unique challenges, including error accumulation over time, motion-appearance coupling, multi-objective trade-offs, and limited supervision for temporal properties. These challenges motivate systematic post-training strategies that adapt pretrained models without retraining them from scratch. In this survey, we present the first comprehensive review of post-training and alignment in video generation models. We frame post-training as a unifying framework and distinguish between implicit alignment and explicit alignment based on how alignment signals are enforced. From this perspective, we organize existing approaches into four broad categories: supervised fine-tuning methods, self-training and distillation methods, preference- and reward-based methods, and inference-time methods. This taxonomy provides a coherent view of how alignment signals shape model behavior across both training and deployment. Beyond methodological advances, we review commonly used datasets, benchmarks, and evaluation practices, and discuss open challenges such as scalable reward design, long-horizon temporal consistency, stability-expressiveness trade-offs, and safety-aware generation. This survey aims to provide a structured conceptual foundation and practical guidance for advancing controllable and reliable video generation models.

Community

Paper submitter

How can we make video generation models more controllable, temporally consistent, and aligned with human intent?

Our survey, published in TMLR, provides a unified guide to post-training and alignment for video generation, covering supervised fine-tuning, distillation, preference optimization, and inference-time methods.

📖 What you’ll find:

  • A unified conceptual framework: understand how different methods enforce alignment signals, connecting implicit and explicit alignment across training and inference.
  • A guide to methods and evaluation: navigate approaches, datasets, and benchmarks relevant to your research.
  • Open research directions: explore challenges in reward design, long-horizon consistency, safety, and the trade-off between stability and expressiveness.

We also maintain a companion repository with a continuously updated collection of papers and resources.

We hope this serves as a useful starting point for entering the field and a reference for developing new methods. Contributions and discussions are welcome!

⭐ Follow the repository for updates, and please consider citing the survey if it helps your research.

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.00812
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.00812 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.00812 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.00812 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.