Papers
arxiv:2610.01939

Fewer Tokens, Better Action: GPT-6 Astra Robot Agents with 14% Higher Success Rate but 65% Fewer Tokens

Published on Oct 1
· Submitted by
RuiyangSi
on Oct 2
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Vision language model (VLM) agents can control robots through visual feedback and action primitives, but repeated model invocations and redundant observations incur substantial token overhead. We introduce PyRUA-Lean, an interactive code-execution framework that couples feedback-driven primitive composition with selective observation: the agent composes classical robot primitives and learned vision-language-action (VLA) policies into Python cells that perform conditional checks and local retries, returning only explicitly requested images and state feedback for replanning. Across 700 simulated task instances from LIBERO-PRO, RoboTwin 2.0, and RoboCasa365, we compare PyRUA-Lean with a tool-calling baseline using the same GPT-6 Astra planner and underlying robot primitives. Under equal LLM-call budgets, PyRUA-Lean increases overall success from 63.1% to 71.7%. On instances solved by both agents, it uses 49% fewer LLM calls and 65% fewer input tokens.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

Vision language model (VLM) agents can control robots through visual feedback and action primitives, but repeated model invocations and redundant observations incur substantial token overhead. We introduce PyRUA-Lean, an interactive code-execution framework that couples feedback-driven primitive composition with selective observation: the agent composes classical robot primitives and learned vision-language-action (VLA) policies into Python cells that perform conditional checks and local retries, returning only explicitly requested images and state feedback for replanning. Across 700 simulated task instances from LIBERO-PRO, RoboTwin 2.0, and RoboCasa365, we compare PyRUA-Lean with a tool-calling baseline using the same GPT-6 Astra planner and underlying robot primitives. Under equal LLM-call budgets, PyRUA-Lean increases overall success from 63.1% to 71.7%. On instances solved by both agents, it uses 49% fewer LLM calls and 65% fewer input tokens.

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.01939
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.01939 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.01939 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.01939 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.