CURIO: Curiosity-Driven Test-Time Learning for Open-Ended Discovery
Abstract
CURIO enhances open-ended discovery by combining reinforcement learning with an intrinsic curiosity world model that rewards exploration beyond high-reward paths, improving mathematical and biological task performance across model scales.
Open-ended discovery requires learning from repeated attempts while continuing to explore directions whose value is not yet apparent. Search with a frozen large language model (LLM) can reuse previous solutions in context, but cannot update the model from its successes and failures on the test problem. Reinforcement learning (RL) enables such adaptation; however, strongly favoring high-reward trajectories may suppress low-reward yet potentially promising directions too early. We introduce CURIO, a curiosity-driven test-time learning framework that complements task feedback with an Intrinsic Curiosity World Model (ICWM). The ICWM learns transitions in the policy's hidden-state representation and supplies prediction-error bonuses at sampled tokens outside the policy's top-k choices. Epoch normalization and an annealed weight regulate their contribution to the policy update. On six mathematical discovery tasks and single-cell denoising with Qwen3 backbones from 8B to 235B, three-run means improve over a matched task-only RL control on five mathematical objectives, match the best reported performance on Circle Packing, and improve denoising Score and mean squared error (MSE) on both held-out corpora at every tested scale. Relative gains reach 18.3% on Hadamard and 10.8% on denoising Score. Code-diversity measurements show greater structural variation among generated programs, supporting curiosity as a complementary exploration signal for learning in open-ended discovery.
Community
CURIO: Curiosity-Driven Test-Time Learning for Open-Ended Discovery
Test-time RL lets an LLM actually learn from its own attempts on a discovery problem, but reward-only updates tend to collapse onto early high-reward trajectories and kill off directions that look bad now but could pay off later.
CURIO adds a curiosity signal to test-time RL:
- 🧠 Intrinsic Curiosity World Model (ICWM): learns transitions in the policy’s own hidden-state space and gives prediction-error bonuses to sampled tokens outside the policy’s top-k, rewarding genuinely novel reasoning instead of random noise.
- ⚖️ Stable integration: epoch-wise normalization and an annealed curiosity weight keep the bonus as a complement to task reward, so it doesn’t override it.
Results (Qwen3-8B to 235B):
- 📐 Beats a matched task-only RL baseline on 5 of 6 math discovery objectives, and matches the best reported result on Circle Packing
- 🧬 Improves single-cell denoising Score and MSE on both held-out corpora at every scale tested
- 📈 Up to +18.3% on Hadamard and +10.8% on denoising Score
- 🌱 Generated programs are measurably more structurally diverse
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- From Search to Signal: Online Post-Training in Automatic Heuristic Design (2026)
- Improving Math Reasoning through Value-guided Informative Search (2026)
- Evolving in Thought Space: Training a Small Model at Test Time Unlocks Better Discoveries (2026)
- Allspark: Weak to Strong Transfer via Alternating Chain of Thought (2026)
- Unlocking the Critic: Reward-Free Policy Optimization for LLM Post-Training (2026)
- OPSRD: On-Policy Self-Role Distillation (2026)
- Learning Beyond What You Sample: Off-Policy-Aware Cross-Model Trajectory Exchange for RLVR (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.04851 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper