Papers
arxiv:2610.09454

RobotAPO: Adversarial Physics Preference Optimization for Robotic Manipulation Video Generation

Published on Oct 7
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

AgiBot-PhysPref and RobotAPO use adversarial preference optimization in flow-matching space to correct localized physics violations in robotic manipulation videos, improving real-robot execution success.

Robotic manipulation videos are increasingly used as visual plans for embodied agents, but optimizing purely for visual plausibility often fails to capture the fragile physical manifold of real-world interactions. Even minor physics-violating errors at the interaction boundary, such as interpenetration or premature object motion, can completely invalidate the inferred timing and pose needed for downstream execution. Because standard supervised fine-tuning lacks the direct pressure to penalize these localized failures, we introduce AgiBot-PhysPref. This rigorously curated 10,000-sample preference dataset isolates condition-matched physics violations, turning the generator's own failure distribution into a foundational signal for physical consistency. Building upon this, we propose RobotAPO, an adversarial physics preference optimization framework operating in the continuous flow-matching denoising space. To prevent the policy from merely memorizing static curated failures, RobotAPO employs a lightweight adversarial counterfactual proposer that learns a condition-dependent, physical-failure-biased direction in denoising space. This encourages the model to explore and better respect the physical interaction boundary, all while maintaining a pure prompt-and-reference inference interface without requiring external structural conditioning. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that explicitly correcting these localized physics violations improves downstream robot execution from generated videos. On held-out AgiBot conditions, RobotAPO outperforms the strongest controlled internal baseline in physical consistency by 6.8% hard score and 10.0% soft score. Crucially, in real-robot replay, it translates these physical-consistency gains into a 37.4% relative improvement in task success over the strongest controlled internal baseline.

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.09454
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.09454 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.09454 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.09454 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.