The value of information and the emergence of communication in evolved e-puck robots
Abstract
We study when communication emerges between autonomous agents and what role an innate action selection architecture plays. Two e-puck robots, reconstructed in PyBullet from their Webots model and validated against it, must find a feeding zone that can only be detected when a robot passes over it. Each robot can emit a one-bit signal whose direction is detected by the receiver. Control is provided by a GRU recurrent network with a residual path, either operating alone or as a channel within an Embedded Action Selection Architecture (EASA). Fitness measures only the time the robots spend over the food. When the robots receive a compass pointing to the food, use of the signal disappears completely. Without a compass, in a small arena, three independent runs achieved similar performance using different strategies: a referential signal, a permanent beacon, or no use of the signal. As the arena expands, the strategy based on a referential signal generalizes best. In contrast, evolving directly in the large arena does not increase the frequency of communication, but it does separate the strategies, and the referential signal clearly outperforms solitary searching. Within EASA, innate reflexes constrain the network and reduce performance. As its priorities evolve, evolution consistently weakens those reflexes. The results suggest that communication emerges in proportion to the value of the information it transmits, and that an innate scaffolding designed for isolated agents can be an impediment in a social task.
Community
This paper investigates when communication emerges in evolutionary robotics and how its emergence depends on the value of information available to autonomous agents. Using evolved e-puck robots reconstructed in PyBullet and validated against Webots, we show that referential communication naturally appears when it provides a measurable advantage and tends to disappear when equivalent information is directly available. The study also examines how innate action-selection mechanisms influence the evolution of communication, providing evidence that some forms of built-in behavioral scaffolding can hinder performance in social tasks.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Behavioral Persistence and Incomplete Functional Transfer of Co-evolved Communication in Evolutionary Robotics (2026)
- Evaluating the Transfer of Co-Evolved Communication from 2D to 3D Simulation (2026)
- The rise and evolution of a referential code in populations of bee-like agents (2026)
- Latent Telepathy: Multi-Robot Communication with Self-Supervised Perceptual Latents (2026)
- Emergence, Not Bandwidth: Physical Coupling and the Limits of Learned Multi-Agent Communication (2026)
- Scale and Selection: What Makes Automatic Harness Evolution Work for Visual-Interface Robot Agents (2026)
- Coding Agents with Harness for Safe Robot Control (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 1
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper