Papers
arxiv:2610.21261

Behavioral Compositionality of Sparse Autoencoder Representations

Published on Oct 15
· Submitted by
Haotian Ma
on Oct 16
Authors:
,

Abstract

Sparse autoencoder features are partially compositional but require interaction terms for accurate behavioral predictions and steering.

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) represent model activations with sparse, linearly decoded features, but the downstream effects of those features need not compose additively. We introduce SAE Additivity Residuals (SAR), which measure the behavioral variation left unexplained above a chosen interaction order. Under independent feature subset sampling, population SAR is exactly the normalized energy of interactions above that order and bounds coalition ordering error for the optimal low order approximation. To distinguish compositionality associated with the SAE representation from that induced by downstream computation, we compare learned SAE coordinates with sum preserving random rotations of the same selected subspace and find lower first order residuals for the learned coordinates across all 18 model and behavior settings. The coordinates are nevertheless not fully additive: pairwise terms improve held out coalition ordering in every setting and outperform parameter matched models using randomly selected third order terms. In a combined steering experiment, pairwise modeling raises rank fidelity from 0.5874 to 0.7790 and reduces ordering error from 0.1444 to 0.0606. Together, these results show that SAE coordinates support comparatively compositional behavioral descriptions while faithful joint explanations and interventions still require interactions beyond individual feature effects. Code is available at https://github.com/OpenSAE/SAE-Behavioral-Compositionality.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

Can sparse autoencoder features explain model behavior one feature at a time?

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) decode activations linearly, but their downstream behavioral effects need not be additive. We introduce SAE Additivity Residuals (SAR) to measure the behavioral variation that individual features and low-order interactions cannot explain.

Our theory connects SAR exactly to higher-order interaction energy and provides bounds on coalition ordering error. Across 18 model and behavior settings, learned SAE coordinates are more behaviorally additive than matched random rotations, but important interactions remain.

Modeling pairwise interactions improves held-out coalition rank fidelity from 0.9782 to 0.9959. In a steering experiment, it improves rank fidelity from 0.5874 to 0.7790.

These results suggest that SAE features provide useful coordinates for understanding model behavior, while faithful joint explanations and interventions still require accounting for interactions between features.

We have released the code and a visual 5-minute tutorial through OpenSAE. Feedback and discussion are welcome!

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.21261
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.21261 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.21261 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.21261 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.