Papers
arxiv:2610.21459

Can Visual Generation Expand What Unified Multimodal Models Know?

Published on Oct 15
· Submitted by
liwenkai
on Oct 19
Authors:
,
,

Abstract

Visual image-generation training can expand pretrained multimodal models' knowledge, with alignment techniques improving text-based access to that visually acquired information.

Unified multimodal models (UMMs) receive image-generation supervision that exposes them to visual information not fully documented in text. Can learning to generate images expand what pretrained models know? We introduce Knowledge Transfer Probing (KTP), a controlled protocol that supplies new knowledge through image-generation training and tests its accessibility through text-only question answering. Across seven knowledge categories and three UMMs, we observe direct but uneven transfer from visual supervision to language. Motivated by these observations, we successively introduce Textual Alignment and Interleaved Image--Text Alignment, which connect generation and answering through shared knowledge and interleaved responses, respectively. Guidance on selected entities can improve knowledge access on other entities without QA supervision, with additional gains from interleaved alignment. Further analysis shows that knowledge correctly reproduced in images is often more accessible through text, although substantial gaps remain between the two forms of access. These findings support visual generation as a source of knowledge beyond textual supervision, and motivate joint investigation of training data design and model architecture to make this knowledge more broadly accessible.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

We introduce Knowledge Transfer Probing (KTP) to test whether new facts supplied only through images during generation training become accessible through text-only question answering.

Across three unified multimodal models and seven knowledge categories, we find partial but uneven transfer: models often reproduce facts in generated images yet struggle to express them in words.

Interleaved image–text alignment improves average QA accuracy even on entities without QA supervision, outperforming text-only alignment and making visually acquired knowledge more accessible.

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.21459
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.21459 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.21459 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 1

Collections including this paper 1